Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2009

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 KERALA GAZETTE കേരള ഗസററ്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

No.

Vol. LIV

2009 നവംബർ 17

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

നമ്പർ

തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ

വാല്യം 54 } } ¹⁷th November ²⁰⁰⁹

26th Karthika 1931 1931 കാർത്തികം 26

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

{{^{{FOOTNOTE (1)}}}}

G. O. (Rt.) No.1506/2009/LBR.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2009.

1. Whether the denial of employment as Cashier to Smt. C. P. Omana by the management of M/s A. V. Vacco & Company Hollywood Shoes, Ernakulam is justifiable ?

2. If not what relief the employee is entitled to get ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1507/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Shri P. A. Shamsudheen, Managing Director, M/s A. V. Vacco & Company Hollywood Shoes, M. G. Road, Kochi-35 and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. C. P. Omana w/o Joby, P. D., Parambathusseri, Neerikkode P. O., Alangad-683 511 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Divakaran Nair (Licensee, Sandhya Bar), Hotel Maharani, Changanacherry And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; Gaz. No. 45/2009/DTP (Part I). 146 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I

and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri Joy Thomas, Madikkoo, Joe Villa, Karakkad P. O., Chengannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to Shri Joy Thomas, Kitchen Supervisor in Hotel Maharani, Changanacherry by the management is justifiable?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1508/2009/LBR.

3. Smt. Mano Jacob, Puthiyamadom Veedu, Vellappalli Medoz, Puthanangadi, Kottayam-686 001 (Managing Partner) and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri K. J. Joseph, Kureekkattil Veedu, Pallam P. O., Kottayam-686 007 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri K. J. Joseph, Employee, by the management of Apollo Sindhoori Capital Investment Limited, Adam Tower, Star Junction, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2009.

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1549/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th October 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nyamakkad Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki District - 685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necesssary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Muniasamy, P. F. No. 1969 of East Division of Nyamakkad Estate by the management is justifiable or not ?

2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No.1509/2009/LBR.

Read:—1. G. O. (Rt.) No. 738/2009/LBR, dated 2-6-2009.

2. Representation dated 24-6-2009 from the General Secretary, Elite Breads Employees Association (INTUC).

3. Letter No. I (4) 16344/09 dated 1-8-2009 from the Labour Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram.

1. An Industrial Dispute arose between the management of M/s Elite Breads Private Limited, Thrissur and its workmen over the issues of transfer of employees was referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad under the section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 as per the Government Order read as 1st paper above.

2. The General Secretary, Elite Breads Employees Association as per representation read as 2nd paper, requested Government to amend the issue for reference as per the Government Order read above, as the place of transfer is given as Hosdurg instead of Hossur.

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between 1. Shri Rajan Itty Cheria, Arakkapadikkal Veedu, Pakkil P. O., Kottayam-686 012 (Managing Partner), 2. Shri Suku Ninan, Mullappallil, Mariathuruth P. O., Kottayam-686 017 (Managing Partner), 3. Government have examined the matter in detail with reference to the section 10 (5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and are pleased to amend the issue of reference as follows:

1. Whether the transfer of 1. Shri P. S. Shaji, 2. N. S. Jugal Das, 3. Rakesh Chandran, 4. C. G. Ratheesh from Thrissur to Hossur, Tamilnadu is justifiable ? If not, what relief allowable to them ?

17th NOV. 2009] KERALA GAZETTE 147

2. Whether the denial of employment of the above four workmen by the management is justifiable or not ? If not what relief allowable to them ?

4. The Government Order read as 1st paper above stands modified to the above extent.

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1573/2009/LBR.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct . .

. that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Shri K. Rajendran, Salesman by the Proprietor of Thiruvananthapuram, 9th October 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Mattupetty Estate, Munnar, Idukki and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Workers Congress (INTCI), Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters Krishna Stores, Kattakada without giving compensation is justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1653/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th October 2009.

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Alagamuniandy, Worker (PF No. 3998), of Kuttiar Division of Mattupetty Estate by the management is justifiable on not ?

2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1614/2009/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. Shri A. J. Tharakan, Chairman, Accelerated Freeze Drying Company Limited (AFDC), Ezhupunna, Cherthala, Alappuzha, 2. Shri K. E. Krishnakumar, Senior Manager (P and A), Accelerated Freeze Drying Company Limited, Ezhupunna, Cherthala and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri Jesus John, Jese House, Vayalar East P. O., Cherthala, Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

Thiruvananthapuram, 20th October 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri K. Soman, Proprietor, Krishna Stores, Kattakada and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri K. Rajendran, Anjuthenginmoodu, Ushus, Kattakada, Kulathummal Village in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Shri Jesus John, Machine Operator Grade-B1, Accelerated Freeze Drying Company Limited, Ezhupunna by the management is justifiable or not ? If not, what are the benefits he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is G. SIVAPRASAD, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; Under Secretary to Government.