©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2009
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 KERALA GAZETTE കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
No.
Vol. LIV
2009 നവംബർ 24
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ 46
നമ്പർ
വാല്യം 54 } } 24th November 2009
3rd Agrahayana 1931 1931 അഗ്രഹായനം 3
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
ANNEXURE
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No.1334/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 28th August 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri M. S. Mathew (Owner, Trichur Auto Centre), Mannummel Veedu, Kandassamkadavu P. O., Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri Kochappan, S/o. Rappayi, Nellankara Veedu, Marathakkara P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Whether the denial of employment to Shri Kochappan, Cashier by the employer Shri M.S. Mathew (Owner, Trichur Auto Centre), Mannummel Veedu, Kandassamkadavu P. O., Thrissur is Justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1504/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Letchmy Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
150 KERALA GAZETTE [PART III (5) ANNEXUREWhether the dismissal of Shri Krishnan, Worker, New Munnar Division, Letchmy Estate by the management is Justifiable or not? 2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to?
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No.1569/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 9th October 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Guderale Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District, Pin-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki District Pin-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Arokiadas, Worker (PF No. 5322), Aruvikkad Central Division of Guderale Estate by the management is Justifiable or not?
2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to?
(4)
G.O. (Rt.) No.1570/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 9th October 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Letchumi Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District, Pin-685 612 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Employees Union (CITU), Munnar P. O., Idukki District Pin-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
G. O. (Rt.) No.1571/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 9th October 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Chenduvarai Estate, Sethuparvathipuram, Idukki District and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union, Munnar P. O., Idukki District, Pin-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Vijayakumar, Worker, (P. F. No. 10578), K. K. Division, Elapettry, Chenduvarai Estate by the management is Justifiable or not ?
2. "If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?"
(6)
G. O. (Rt.) No.1572/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 9th October 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District, Pin-685 612 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Muniyasamy, Worker, (P. F. No. 6950), Kallar Factory Division of Nallathanni Estate by the management is Justifiable or not ?
2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?