Servants of Knowledge
Kerala Gazette · Government of Kerala

Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

Published 29 December 2009

Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A) Department
Part
PART - I Notification and Orders issued by the Government
Identifier
in.gazette.kerala_new.2009-12-29.part1_labour_rehabilitation
Languages
English, Malayalam
Published at
Original source ↗

©

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2009 KERALA GAZETTE കേരള ഗസററ്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

No.

Vol. LIV

2009 ഡിസംബർ 29

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

51

നമ്പർ തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ

വാല്യം 54 } } 29th December 2009

8th Pousha 1931 1931 പൌഷം 8

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said Industrial Dispute for Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

adjudication ;

ORDERS

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred (1)

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 G. O. (Rt.) No. 1725/2009/LBR.

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Thiruvananthapuram, 5th November 2009. that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

will pass the award within a period of three months.

Industrial Dispute exists between The Manager,

ANNEXURE

Nullanthanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

1. Whether the dismissal of Smt. Jayaletchumy,represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate P. F. No. 8446 of Centre Division of Nullanthanni Employees Union (CITU), Munnar P. O., Idukki District, Estate by the management is justifiable or not ? Pin-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure 2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ? to this order ; Gaz. No. 51/2009/DTP (Part I).

160 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1726/2009/LBR.

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1728/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th November 2009.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th November 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial Dispute exists between The Manager, Guderale Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Workers Congress (INTUC-I), Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said Industrial Dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri James, P. F. No. 5237, Aruvikad West Division of Guderale Estate by the management is justifiable or not ?

2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1727/2009/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial Dispute exists between The Manager, Nullanthanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said Industrial Dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the date of superannuation of Shri Palanisamy (903032) is to be decided, treating Thiruvananthapuram, 5th November 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial Dispute exists between The Manager, Nullanthanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Employees Union (CITU), Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

his date of birth as 19-8-1954 instead of 10-3-1952, being the date as per the prevailing records kept in the Estate ? The consequential benefits the workers is eligible to get on this basis ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1731/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th November 2009.

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necesssary to refer the said Industrial Dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial Dispute exists between The Managing Director, Kerala State Rural Women Electronic Industrial Co-operative Federation Limited (RUTRONICS), House No. 157, Thilakam, Swathy Nagar, Peroorkada P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 005 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri S. K. Anil Kumar, Preethas, MRA Nagar-194, Manayilkulangara, Thirumullavaram P. O., Kollam-691 013 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Thankaraj, P. F. No. 8691 of Periavurai Lower Division of Nullanthanni Estate by the management is justifiable or not ? necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for 2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ? adjudication ; 29th DEC. 2009] KERALA GAZETTE 161

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

. Whether the denial of employment to Shri S. K. Anil Kumar, Technician, Kerala State Rural Women Electronic Industrial Co-operative Federation Limited by the management is justifiable ? If not what relief he is entitled to ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1732/2009/LBR.

and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate . . Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki . District-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th November 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Director, Lissy Hospital, P. O. Box No. 3053, Kochi-682 018 and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. K. K. Santha w/o I. V. Rajan, Illipparambil House, Asoka Road, Kaloor, Kochi-17 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Palani, Worker, P. F. No. 2626, East division of Nallathanni Estate by the management is justifiable or not ?

2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to ?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1735/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th November 2009.

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the repeated denial of employment to Smt. K. K. Santha, Sweeper, Lissy Hospital, Ernakulam by the management of Lissy Hospital is justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to get ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1733/2009/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Nullanthanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Employees Union (CITU), Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Thiruvananthapuram, 6th November 2009. that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal industrial dispute exists between The Manager, will pass the award within a period of three months. Nullanthanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 162 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is ANNEXURE

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for 1. Whether the dismissal of Smt. Palaniammal, adjudication ;

P. F. No. 3808 of Kurumalai division of Nullanthanni

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Estate by the management is justifiable or not ?

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to ?

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication (9)

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1736/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th November 2009.

ANNEXURE

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Manager,

Nullanthanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Yuvaraj, P. F. No. 9393 of Periavurai Top division of Nullanthanni Estate by the management is justifiable or not ?

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to ?

represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate

Employees Union (CITU), Munnar P. O., Idukki

By order of the Governor, District-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the

G. SIVAPRASAD, annexure to this order ;

Under Secretary to Government.

Cite this issue. Kerala Gazette, Government of Kerala, 29 December 2009. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.kerala_new.2009-12-29.part1_labour_rehabilitation/. Archive identifier in.gazette.kerala_new.2009-12-29.part1_labour_rehabilitation.