©
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2010 KERALA GAZETTE കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
No.
Vol. LV
2010 ഫെബ്രുവരി 16
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
7
നമ്പർ തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ
വാല്യം 55 } } 16th February 2010
27th Magha 1931 1931 മാഘം 27
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of ORDERS
1 9 4 7
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby (1)
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for G. O. (Rt.) No. 1917/2009/LBR.
adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Thiruvananthapuram, 5th December 2009.
Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Wallardie Estate, Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Vandiperiyar P. O. and the workmen of the above referred establishment
represented by (1) The Secretary, Highrange
1. Whether the stoppage of work on 16-1-2008 and Plantation Employees Union (INTUC), Vandiperiyar,
23-1-2008 in the Wallardie Estate, Harrisons I d u k k i ,
Malayalam Limited is justifiable ?
(2) The Secretary, Peermadu Thottam Thozhilai Union
2. If not what are the relief the workers are (CITU), Peermadu P. O. in respect of matters mentioned
entitled for ?
in the annexure to this order ;
adjudication ;
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1918/2009/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th December 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Autokast Limited, S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala-688 582 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala Independent Silk Employees Union, S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1 9 4 7 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of promotion to the following 31 workers (List enclosed) from unskilled to skilled category and 20 workmen from workers category to
supervisors' category by the Management of Autokast Limited, S. N. Puram, Cherthala is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief they are entitled to get ?
പരാതിക്കാരായ തൊഴിലാളികളുടെ പേരുവിവിരം ക്രമ ടോക്കൺ പേര്
നമ്പർ നമ്പർ
(1) (2) (3)
വർക്കർ കാറ്റഗറിയിൽനിന്ന് സൂപ്പർവൈസർ കാറ്റഗറിയി ലേക്കുള്ള പ്രമോഷനിൽ സീനിയോറിട്ടി നഷ്ടപ്പെട്ടവരുടെ ലിസ്റ്റ്
1 541 ജി. ബാലചന്ദ്ര ഷേണായ് 2 561 കെ. എസ്. രാധാകൃഷ്ണൻ 3 574 ജി. മോഹനൻ
4 577 തിരുനാവക്ക് അരശ്, ആർ.
5 601 എ. എൻ. രാജപ്പൻ പിള്ള 9 525 ഗോപി, റ്റി. പി.
10 575 മാത്യു അഗസ്റ്റിൻ
11 576 എൻ. ആർ. പ്രകാശൻ
12 623 അലക്സാ≠ർ, എ. ജെ.
13 621 രഘുപതി, റ്റി.
14 631 ജോൺ, കെ. ജെ.
15 662 കെ. സി. കുര്യാക്കോസ് 16 666 കെ. ദാസൻ
17 678 ശശിധരൻ, സി. കെ.
18 685 പൂർണ്ണദാസ്, ഇ.
19 701 ഭുവനേന്ദ്രൻ, കെ. പി.
20 682 സിയാവുള്ള, എം. ഡി.
അൺസ്കിൽഡിൽനിന്നും സ്കിൽഡിലേക്കുള്ള പ്രമോഷനിൽ സീനിയോറിട്ടി നഷ്ടപ്പെട്ടവരുടെ ലിസ്റ്റ് 1 644 രാമചന്ദ്ര ചെട്ടിയാർ
2 721 വിജയൻ, എൻ.
3 731 ചന്ദ്രപ്പൻ, എം.
4 736 ശശികുമാർ
5 737 രാജാദാസ്
6 742 മനോഹരൻ, സി.
7 774 ചന്ദ്രൻ, കെ.
8 800 ഹബീബ് മുഹമ്മദ്
9 801 തമ്പിക്കുറുപ്പ്
10 802 ചന്ദ്രൻ, കെ. കെ.
11 807 പുഷ്പരാജ്
12 810 മോഹനൻ, എ.
13 811 സജീവൻ, എസ്.
14 812 ശശി, വി. പി.
15 813 സാമുവൽ ജേക്ക∫്
16 816 ഗോപാലകൃഷ്ണൻ നായർ 17 879 വിജയൻ, എൻ. എൻ.
18 882 മോഹനൻ, എസ്.
19 883 ശശിധരൻ, പി.
20 884 ശശിധരൻ
21 885 തങ്കച്ചൻ, വി.
22 886 ശങ്കരൻ കുട്ടി, വി.
23 888 അച്ചുതൻ
24 892 സേവ്യർ
25 893 സിൽവസ്റ്റർ
26 895 ഉദയപ്പൻ, കെ. പി.
27 899 ഷാജി, പി. ഡി.
(3)
to Shri Mosess (PF No. 4783) of Nettimadu G. O. (Rt.) No. 1961/2009/LBR.
division of Madupetty Estate by the management is Thiruvananthapuram, 14th December 2009.
justifiable or not ?
2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to?
(5)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1964/2009/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 14th December 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri M. Thomas Mathew, Managing Director, Catholic Reformation Literature Society, Hosanna Mount, Edamattom P. O.-686 588 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri N. A. Aliyar Khani, Nagarmattom, Kattappana P. O., Idukki-685 508 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Manager, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Madupetty Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612
and the workmen of the above referred establishment
represented by the Secretary, The Estates Staff Union of
South India, High Range Branch, Munnar, Idukki-685 612
in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this
order;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is ANNEXURE
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri N. A. Aliyar Khani, Nagarmattom, Kattappana P. O., Idukki, working as Cook in Catholic Reformation Literature Society by the management is justifiable or not ?
by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 2. If not what relief the workman is entitled to?
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government
hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred (4)
for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The G. O. (Rt.) No. 1963/2009/LBR.
Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of Thiruvananthapuram, 14th December 2009. three months.
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Madupetty Estate,
Munnar P. O., Idukki District and the workmen of the above
1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Rajaram, Lathe Operator of Chokkanadu Factory of Madupetty Estate by the management is justifiable or not ?
referred establishment represented by the General Secretary,
Workers Congress (INTUC-I),
2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to?
Munnar P. O., Idukki in respect of matters mentioned in the
(6)
annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
G . O. (Rt.) No.1965/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 14th December 2009.
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that
the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the
Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the
award within a period of three months.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri P. Ramakrishna Pillai, Managing Partner, Padmasree Cashew Company,. Kudikkodu, Vakkanadu P. O. and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kerala Cashew Staff Centre (CITU), CITU Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of confirmation as permanent worker
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kashuvandi Thozhilali Centre (All India UTUC) No. 19, Parappattu Building, Kollam-1 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Whether the refusal of the demand of the Union by the management for category change of Shri R. Rajappan Pillai, Worker in Roasting section to Shelling Mastry or Watcher in the Padmasree Cashew Factory on account of his health is justifiable?
(7)
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
G. O. (Rt.) No.1966/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 14th December 2009.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to Smt. L. Latha, grading section worker of Sherin Cashew Factory, Puthuchira, Mylapur P. O., by the management is justifiable ?
2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to get ?
(9)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 2018/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The President, Athirampuzha General Marketing Co-operative Society Limited No. K-945, Athirampuzha P. O., Kottayam. 2. The Secretary, Athirampuzha General Marketing Co-operative Society Limited No. K-945, Athirampuzha P.O., Kottayam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Industrial Estate General Workers Union (AITUC), CPI Office, Peroor Junction, Ettumanoor P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki and the workmen of the And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Workers Congress (INTUC), Munnar in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
1. Whether the denial of employment to Shri M. D. Abraham, employee in Athirampuzha General Marketing Co-operative Society Limited No. K-945, Athirampuzha P.O., Kottayam, by the management is justifiable ?
ANNEXURE
2. If not what relief the workman entitled to?
(8)
G. O. (Rt.) No.1968/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 14th December 2009.
1. Whether the termination of employment of Shri Ramesh Kannan, Lathe Operator, Nallathanni Estate, Munnar by the management is justifiable or not?
2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
G. O. (Rt.) No. 2019/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December
2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni
Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki and the workmen of the
above referred establishment represented by the General
Secretary, Workers Congress (INTUC), Munnar in respect
of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The
Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Vijayakumar (8725)
of Nallathanni Estate by the management is
justifiable or not ?
2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
By order of the Governor,
G. SIVAPRASAD,