Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

©

Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2010

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

No.

Vol. LV

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ 2010 നവംബർ 9

44

നമ്പർ വാല്യം 55 } } ⁹th November ²⁰¹⁰

18th Karthika 1932 1932 കാർത്തിക 18

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1642/2010/LBR.

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd September 2010.

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri P. O. Jose, Worker by the management of Athirappilly Estate of Kalady Plantation is legal and justifiable ?

2. If not what relief he is entitled to ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1641/2010/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 24th September 2010.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Plantation Corporation, Athirappilly Estate, Kalady Plantation P. O., Kalady, Ernakulam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by 1. Shri P. O. Jose, Puthankudi Veedu, Athirappilly Estate, Kalady Plantation P. O., Ernakulam, 2. The General Secretary, Kalady Plantation Workers Union (CITU), Athirappilly, Kalady Plantation P. O., Ernakulam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri P. Raju, M/s. J.P.R. Construction Company, A-35, Koyickal, 4/1552, Pandit Colony, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram-695 003 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri B. Dayanandan, Cherusseri Puthen Veedu, South Maingappally, Maingappally, Karunagappally, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Shri B. Dayanandan, Workman by the management of M/s. J.P.R. Construction Company, A-35, Koyickal, 4/1552, Pandit Colony, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram-695 003 is justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1643/2010/LBR.

O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 004 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri V. Jayan, Thundukalavila House, Edakkode P. O., Malakkode, Kanyakumari District-629 152 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 24th September 2010.

Whether the termination of service of Shri Jayan, Junior Officer from Southern Refineries Limited is justifiable ? If not what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1667/2010/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th September 2010.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Pobs Estate Private Limited, Seethargundu P. O., Nelliyampathy, Palakkad and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Palakkad District Plantation and General Workers Union (HMS), Padagiri P. O., Nelliyampathy, Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Lalithamany, Worker of Pobs Estate, Nelliyampathy by the management is justifiable ? If not what relief she is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1666/2010/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The President, India Coffee Board Workers Co-operative Society Limited, No. 4227, Thrissur, 2. The Secretary, India Coffee Board Workers Co-operative Society Limited, No. 4227, Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri K. K. Rajesh, Kadalikattil House, Avittathoor P. O., Irinjalakuda, Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th September 2010.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Southern Refineries Limited, TC 3/1557(4), Ist Floor, Kesavadasapuram, M. G. College Hostel Road, Pattom P. 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri K. K. Rajesh, Kadalikattil House, Avittathoor P. O., Irinjalakuda, Thrissur, General Worker in Indian Coffee House, Pala Branch, Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1672/2010/LBR.

Kanimangalathukaran House, Chovoor P. O., Thrissur District and the workmen of the above referred establish- ment represented by the General Secretary, Kerala Thiruvananthapuram, 30th September 2010.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Partner, Sangi & Company, Kalyani Complex, Ballard Road, Kannur-1 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri C. P. Ashok Kumar, S/o C. H. Kumaran, Munden House, Kakkad P. O., Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to Shri C. P. Ashok Kumar by the management of M/s. Sangi & Company, Kannur is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1673/2010/LBR.

Marappani Thozhilali Union (TUCI), TUCI Area Committee Office, Chirakkadiyil Building, Thayamkulangara, Cherppu P. O., Thrissur District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to Shri C. R. Biju, Polishing Worker by the management of K. R. Francis & Furniture Company, Chovoor is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

Thiruvananthapuram, 30th September 2010.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri K. R. Francis, Managing Partner, K. R. Francis & Furniture Company,

By order of the Governor,

RACHEL VARGHESE,

Under Secretary to Government.