Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2011 KERALA GAZETTE
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
No.
Vol. LVI
2011 ഡിസംബർ 20
50 തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ
നമ്പർ വാല്യം 56 } } 20th December 2011
29th Agrahayana 1933 1933 അഗ്രഹായനം 29
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1646/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri C. K. Chakochan,
Proprietor, Jeecel Autospares & Electricals, Main Road,
Chavakkad, Thrissur and the workman of the above
referred establishment Sri C. I. Joseph (Sunny), Cherur
House, Pavaratty P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1694/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to Sri C. I. Joseph (Sunny), Salesman by Sri C. K. Chakochan, Proprietor, Jeecel Autospares & Electricals, Chavakkad is justifiable ?
2. If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1693/2011/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, Kancor Ingredients Limited, Kanakkankadavu Road, Angamaly South-683 573 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri James Thomas, Nambi Madom House, Meykkad P.O., Chembannur, Ernakulam represented by the General Secretary, Kancor Flavours Workers Union (INTUC), Angamaly South, Ernakulam, Pin-683 573 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Saravanan, A., Regional Head, Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management Company Limited, Radhika, Opposite to Axis Bank, Rajaji Road, Kochi-682 035 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. Mahadevan, TC 40/872, Sreevaraham East, Manacaud P. O., Thiruvananthapuram, Pin-695 009 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Sri James Thomas, Charge man from the service by the management of M/s. Kancor Ingredients Limited, Angamaly is legal and justifiable ?
2. If not, what relief he is entitled to get?
(4)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1695/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the termination of service of Sri K. Mahadevan by the management is justifiable ?
2. If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Santhosh Kumar, Manager, G. D. S. Security Service, Global Detective Security Service, Opposite to Army Officers Enclave, Pangode, Thirumala P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-6 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by Adv. G. Vijayakumar, Secretary, Kollam Jilla Security Employees Union, Ashtamudi Law Chambers, Thevally, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to Sri Asokan by the management G. D. S. Security Service is justifiable or not?
2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to get?
(5)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1696/2011/LBR.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Sri K. Kuttappan Pillai, Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Milk Tester from the Service of Vettinad Ksheerolpathaka Co-operative Society Ltd. No. T. 220(D), APCOS, Vettinad, Vattappara P. O. by the management is justifiable ?
2. If not what are the reliefs he is entitled to?
(7)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1728/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 14th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Rubber Marketing Federation Limited, PB No. 15, Gandhi Nagar, Kochi-682 020 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kerala State Crumb Rubber Factories Staff Association, INTUC (I), Chenappady P. O., Kanjirappally, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to the permanent staff of the Chenappady Crumb Rubber Factory, Smt.Vijayamma Chandra Mohan, Smt.Leela Kumari, S., Sri Abraham N. T., Sri Nissar, P. P., Sri Sebastian, K. J., Sri Sebastian, A. K. due to the lockout of the factory is justifiable or not?
2. If not what relief they are entitled to?
(6)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1697/2011/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Partner, Hotel Windsor Castle, Kodimatha, Kottayam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kottayam Jilla Shop & Other Establisment Mazdoor Sangh, BMS Office, T. B. Junction, M. L. Road, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Vettinad Ksheerolpathaka Co-operative Society Ltd. No. T. 220(D), APCOS, Vettinad, Vattappara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-28 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. Kuttappan Pillai, Lakshmi Bhavan, Vettinad, Vattappara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
1. Whether the dismissal from service of 1. Regi, T. (Bill Captain), 2. Sri Cheriyan, M. K. (House Keeping), 3. Sri Aneesh, A. (Gardener), 4. Sri Ajeesh, P. S. (House Keeping), 5. Sri Sajeev, D. (Security) and 6. Sri Roy, T. (Project Worker), Workers of Hotel Windsor Castle, Kodimatha, Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?
2. If not, what reliefs the workmen entitled to?
©Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2011
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 KERALA GAZETTE
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
No.
Vol. LVI
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ 2011 ഡിസംബർ 20
50
നമ്പർ
വാല്യം 56 } } 20th December 2011
29th Agrahayana 1933 1933 അഗ്രഹായനം 29
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
{{^{{FOOTNOTE (2)}}}}
G. O. (Rt.) No.1752/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th November 2011.
G. O. (Rt.) No.1740/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 15th November 2011.
Read:—1. G. O. (Rt.) No. 175/2011/LBR dated 1-2-2011.
2. Lr. No. I D 8/2011 dated 7-3-2011 from the Presiding Officer (in-charge), Labour Court, Kozhikode.
3. Lr. No. I (1) 9358/2011 dated 3-9-2011 from the Labour Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram.
In the circumstances reported in the letter read as 2nd and 3rd papers above, Government are pleased to order that the Industrial dispute referred for adjudication to Read:—1. G. O. (Rt.) No. 102/2011/LBR dated 19-1- 2011.
2. Lr. No. I D 7/2011 dated 7-3-2011 from the
Presiding Officer (in-charge), Labour Court, Kozhikode.
3. Lr. No. I (1) 9358/2011 dated 3-9-2011 from the Labour Commissioner,
Thiruvananthapuram.
In the circumstances reported in the letter read as 2. The Government Order read
above stands modified to the above
extent.
By order of the Governor,
L. GEETHA,