Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

click here for IIIF manifest

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/12-14 Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2012

KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

2012 ജനുവരി 17

No.

Vol. LVII

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

നമ്പർ തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ

വാല്യം 57 } } ¹⁷th January ²⁰¹²

27th Pousha 1933 1933 പൌഷം 27

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDER

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1861/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 20th December 2011.

ANNEXURE

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President, Kundara

Ksheera Vyavasaya Co-operative Society Limited No. Q 88,

Kundara P. O., Kollam-691 501 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri J. Pradeep Kumar,

Whether the denial of employment of Sri J. Pradeep Kumar (Driver) by the management, i.e., President, Kundara Ksheera Vyavasaya Co-operative Society Limited No. Q 88 is justifiable or not? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get?

Rosh Bhavan, Nanthirakkal, Vellimon P. O., Perinad,

Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

By order of the Governor,And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is R. SASIKUMAR, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Under Secretary to Government. adjudication; ORDER ANNEXURE G . O. (Rt.) No. 1880/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whether there is any denial of employment to Sri M. N. Jayaraman, Pooja Assistant, Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited, Edayar, Aluva by the management ? If so, what are the reliefs the workman is entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1882/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. P. Subhash, Mundekudiyil Veedu, Ayirapuram P. O., Keezhillam-683 551 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the alleged denial of employment to Sri M. P. Subhash by the management of M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam is justifiable or not?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RACHEL VARGHESE, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri R. Murukan, Chairman, Mary Matha College of Engineering and Technology, Paliyode, Dalummukham P. O., Neyyattinkara, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. I. Ajin Mosses, Sabu Sadanam, Kuttikkad, Elluvila P. O.-695 504 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

Under Secretary to Government.

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1881/2011/LBR.

Whether the denial of employment to Sri M. I. Ajin Mosses, Library Assistant by the management is justifiable ? If not what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1883/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited (CMRL), Edayar and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. N. Jayaraman, Pishari Kovil Variam, Eroor West, Thrippunithura in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Chairman, Mahatma Gandhi International Charities (Gandhi Bhavan), Pathanapuram, Kollam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri S. Raju, Ravi Vilasam Veedu, Padam P. O., Kalathoor via, Pathanamthitta in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. ANNEXURE that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

Whether the denial of employment to Sri S. Raju by the management i.e. Chairman, Mahatma Gandhi International Charities is justifiable or not? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1884/2011/LBR.

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the alleged denial of employment to Sri C. R. Mohanadasan Nair by the management of M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam is Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, M.R.F. Limited, PB No. 2, Vadavathoor, Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Thomas Chacko, Malippurath House, Mangottuchira, Pandangari P. O., Edathua, Alappuzha-689 721 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

justifiable or not?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1925/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th December 2011.

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Sri Thomas Chacko, Worker, MRF Limited, Vadavathoor, Kottayam by the management is justifiable?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitiled to?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1899/2011/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Autocast Limited, S.N. Puram P. O., Cherthala-688 582 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala Silk Employees Union (AITUC), S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala-688 582, Reg. No. 03-24/1988, Autocast Unit in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri C. R. Mohanadasan Nair, Chennattu Veedu, Ayirapuram P. O. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of promotion of non ITI Workers to the post of Supervisor (Assistant Engineer) by the management of M/s. Autocast Limited, S. N. Puram, Cherthala is justifiable ? If not, what relief they are entitled to?

By order of the Governor,R. SASIKUMAR, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct Under Secretary to Government.