©
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/12-14 Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ 2012
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
7th February 2012 2012 ഫെബ്രുവരി 7 No.
Vol. LVII
ThiruvananThapuram, Tues-
6
day
നമ്പർ
18th Magha 1933 1933 മാഘം 18
വാല്യം 57 }
PARt I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERs
(1)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 30/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that
an industrial dispute exists between sri M. A. Habeeb,
Managing Partner, silverstream Plastics and Chemicals
Limited, Ponjassery, Ernakulam and the workmen of the
above referred establishment represented by the secretary,
silvertsream Plastics and Chemicals Employees Union
(sPCEU), Ponjassery P.O., Ernakulam-683 547 in respect
of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
24 KERALA GAzETTE [Part IAnd whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
(3)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 35/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
1. Whether the Charter of Demands dated 15-5-2010 submitted by the Union regarding wage revision etc. of the Employees of silverstream Plastics and Chemicals Limited is justifiable?
2. Whether the lock out with effect from 30-10-2010 and closure with effect from 1-12-2010 by the management during the discussion before the District Labour Officer is justifiable ?
3. Whether any unfair labour practices have been committed by the management against union workers?
4. What are the relief the workers are entitled to?
(2)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 34/2012/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General secretary, Workers Congress, Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
Whether smt. Mallika, Temporary Worker of Kallar Factory Division, Nallathanni Estate is eligible to get permanency in the Estate? 2. If yes, what relief she is entitled to?
(4)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 36/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The Director, Tyford Tea Limited, Penta Tower, 6th Floor, Kaloor, Kochi, 2. The Senior Manager, Tyford Estate, Fairfield P.O., Ealappara, Idukki District and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Regional secretary, Estate staff Union of south India, Peermade in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
Whether the change in conditions of service of sri sanalkumar, Pharmacist by the management of Tyford Estate is justifiable ? 2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing Director, M.M.J. Plantations, Manarkadu Buildings, Pala, Kottayam, 2. The Manager, M.M.J. Plantations, Kottamala Estate, Kottamala P. O., Peermade, Idukki District and the workman of the above referred establishment sri Rajan, Check Roll No. 1270, I Division, Kottamala, Vagamon, Idukki-685 503 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
1. Whether the denial of employment to shri Rajan, CR. No. 1270, Kottamala Estate, Vagamon by the management of the Estate is justifiable ? 2. If not what reliefs the workman is entitled to ?
25 KERALA GAzETTE [Part I(5)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 37/2012/LBR.
Court, will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.
Whether the denial of termination from service to smt. Leela, Worker on the ground of her disability by the management of sastha Enterprises, Onambalam is justifiable? If not what relief she is entitled to?
(7)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 43/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) The secretary, Marthoma Medical Mission, Marthoma sabha Office, Thiruvalla-689 101, (2) The Administrator, Fellowship Mission Hospital, Kumbanad, Pathanamthitta-689 547 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) The General secretary, Pathanamthitta District Private Hospital Employees Union (CITU), Pathanamthitta, (2) sri A. T. Thomas, secretary, Pathanamthitta District Private Hospital Employees Union (CITU), Fellowship Mission Hospital Unit, Kumbanad, Pathanamthitta-689 547 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
Whether the decision of the management of Fellowship Mission Hospital, Kumbanad to effect changes in the existing service condition including leave with wages, age of retirement/ superannuation of employees in the establishment is justifiable?
(6)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 41/2012/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Publisher, Madhyamam Daily, silver Hills, Kozhikode-673 012 and the workman of the above referred establishment sri A. M. Ahmed shah, Ahammediya Manzil, Naranganam North P. O., Pathanamthitta District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
Whether the termination of service of sri A. M. Ahmed shah, Reporter/sub Editor with effect from 1-9-2010 by the management of Madhyamam Daily, Kozhikode is justifiable ? If not what relief the worker is entitled to get?
Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2012.
(8)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 75/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) sri Najeem Mussaliyar, Proprietor, Najeem Cashew Industries, Onambalam (2) sri N. Nandakumar, Managing Partner, sastha Enterprises, Onambalam, H.O. No. XXV/2000, Ayathil P. O., Kollam-691 021 and the worker of the above referred establishment smt. Leela, Raju Mandiram, Koduvila P. O., East Kallada, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Autokast Limited, Cherthala and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General secretary, Construction Workers Union (CITU), Autokast Union, Reg. No. 1-3/2001, s. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred26 KERALA GAzETTE [Part I by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
annexure
Whether the demand for permanency of five contract workers namely, sri Muraleedharan Nair, C., sri Krishnakumar, G., sri Bhagavat singh, P., sri Anirudhan, s. and sri Vijayakumar, N. in M/s. Autokast Limited, Cherthala is justifiable?
If not, for what relief they are entitled to?
(9)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 78/2012/LBR.
Mazdoor sangham, Fort, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
Annexure
Whether the demands for enhancements of wages, other service benefits and denial of Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The President, PTA, Government Model Higher secondary school for Girls, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram, 2. The Headmistress, Government Model Higher secondary school for Girls, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General secretary, Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Motor and Engineers employment to the bus drivers, 1. K. Kripas, 2. P. Thankappan Nair, 3. R. Gopinathan Nair, 4. C. sreekandan Nair and the bus conductors, 1. sajeev Kumar, 2. s. Devarajan, 3. s. soman, 4. K. Thankappan Asari are justifiable or not? If not what are the reliefs entitled to?
By order of the Governor,