Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

click here for IIIF manifest

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/12-14 Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2012

KERALA GAZETTE

കേരള ഗസററ്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

2012 ഫെബ്രുവരി 28

No.

Vol. LVII

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

നമ്പർ തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ

വാല്യം 57 } } ²⁸th February ²⁰¹²

9th Phalguna 1933 1933 ഫാൽഗുനം 9

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 76/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri N. Chandrasekharan Nair,

Licensee, Toddy Shop No. 45, Muttappally,

Mukkoottuthara P. O., Erumeli, Kottayam and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Mundakayam Madya Vyavasaya

Thozhilali Union, AITUC, Mundakayam, Kottayam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Sri K. J. Jose, Salesman, Toddy Shop No. 45, Muttappally, Mukkoottuthara P. O., Erumeli, Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 77/2012/LBR.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to the workman Sri Renjith by the Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 80/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan, Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Pradeepkumar, Chettikunnel House, Meenadam P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to the workman Sri Pradeepkumar by the Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(3)

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan, Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. S. Rajesh, Mulavanakunnel, Meenadam P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to the workman Sri M. S. Rajesh by the Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 81/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

G . O. (Rt.) No. 79/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan, Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Renjith, Amala Bhavan, Arumanoor P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan, Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. S. Prasad, Kannattuprambil House, Kurichi P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to the workman Sri K. S. Prasad by the Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 82/2012/LBR.

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to the workman Sri Anoop by the Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 100/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan, Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Jijimon, Punnamoottil House, Vakathanam P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to the workman Sri Jijimon by the Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 83/2012/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The Headmaster, Government L. P. School, Thalanadu, Kottayam, 2. The President, PTA Committee, Government L. P. School, Thalanadu, Kottayam and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt. Aswathi Thankachan, Kunnumpurathu, Thalanadu, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

1. Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Aswathy Thankachan, Cook, Government L. P. School, Thalanadu, Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan, Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Anoop, Manikkattu House, S. H. Mount P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;