Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

click here for IIIF manifest

Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2012

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N) /12/12-14

KERALA GAZETTE

കേരള ഗസററ്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

No.

Vol. I

തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ വാല്യം 1

2012 സെപ്റ്റംബർ 18

നമ്പർ

} 18th September 2012

} 27th Bhadra 1934 1934 ഭാദ്രം 27

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 1190/2012/LBR.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, Pullikkanam Estate, Cochin Malabar Estates and Industries Ltd., Pullikkanam P. O., Vagamon (Via), Idukki District, Pin-685 503 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the President, High Range Plantation Employees Union (INTUC), Peermade, Pin-685 531 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of 1519 Sivaraman, employee of Pullikkanam Estate owned by Cochin Malabar Estates and Industries Ltd., Pullikkanam P. O., Vagamon by the management of the Estate is justifiable.?

2. If not, what reliefs the workman are entitled to ?

{{^{{FOOTNOTE (2)}}}}

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1192/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th August 2012. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Packeting Centre, Pallivasal, Munnar P. O., 685 612 and theii workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Workers Congress, Munnar P. O., 685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1205/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th August 2012.

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Smt. Sugumary, P. F. 5639 Packeting Centre, Pallivasal is justifiable?

2. If not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1193/2012/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between M/s Mica Sales Corporation, Asialiai Trust Building, T. D. Road, (Southern End), Ernakulam-682 011 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Sreekanth G. Pai, S/o A. V. Gopalakrishna Pai, Tachappally Parambil House, Kuthappady Road, Thammanam P. O., Ernakulam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to Thiruvananthapuram, 4th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri N. P. Varghese, Niravath, Kuthukuzhi P. O., Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. T. Baby, Mannartharayil Veed, Nellimattomkara, Kothamangalam in respect of matters mentioned in the Sri Sreekanth G. Pai by the management of M/s Mica Sales Corporation is justifiable?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1256/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 14th August 2012.

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment of Sri M. T. Baby, Conductor from 2-1-2011 onwards by the employer Sri N. P. Varghese, Registered owner of Stage Carriage No. KL-7 AK-2237, is justifiable?

2. If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Home Nursing Service Society, Nagambadam, Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. Meera Soman, Mathathil Veedu, Kooroppada P. O., Kottayam-686 533 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

iii

ANNEXURE

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

1. Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Meera Soman, Pharmacist, Homoeopathy Super Speciality Hospital, Kottayam by the management is justifiable?

ANNEXURE

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1282/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.

Whether the dismissal of Sri S. Vinod (No. 1381) Collection Assistant from service of Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance (Private Ltd.), Bishop Jerome Nagar, Kollam with effect from 3-11-2010 by the management is justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to?

By order of the Governor,

T. R. SOMASUNDARAN, Under Secretary to Government. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, T. T. K. Health Care Ltd., Heart Valve Division, Kinfra Apparel Park, St. Xaviours College P. O., Thumba, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. Sureshkumar, Prabhakara Vilasam Veedu, Kunnanad, Puzhanad P. O., Ottasekharamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram-695 125 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri Sureshkumar from the service of T. T. K. Health Care Ltd., Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1283/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director, Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Company (Private Ltd.), Sree Gokulam Towers, No. 66, Arkot Road, Chennai-24, (2) the Branch Manager, Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance (Private Ltd.), Bishop Jerome Nagar, Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Vanijya Vyavasaya Masdoor Sangh, Masdoor Bhavan, Thamarakulam, Kollam-691 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by