©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2012
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
2012 നവംബർ 6
No.
Vol. I
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ വാല്യം 1
22
നമ്പർ
} 6th November 2012
} 15th Karthika 1934 1934 കാർത്തികം 15
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1538/2012/LBR.
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Janatha Tiles, Moonniyur P. O., Malappuram District and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) The General Secretary, Tile & Ceramics Workers Union (AITUC), Feroke P. O., (2) The General Secretary, Tile Employees Union (INTUC), Cheruvannur, Feroke P. O., (3) The General Secretary, Janatha Tile Workers Union (CITU), Moonniyur P. O., Malappuram District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the nonpayment of wages for the days attending conciliation conference to the Trade Unions representative, by the management of Janatha Tiles, Moonniyur is justifiable ? If not, what is the remedy ?
(2)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1539/2012/LBR.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Hospital, Complex and Centre for Advanced Medical Services Ltd. No. 4386, Pariyaram P. O., Kannur and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) The General Secretary, Pariyaram Medical College Staff Association (INTUC), Pariyaram P. O., Kannur (2) The Secretary, Kerala State Co-operative Workers Federation (HMS), Reg. No. 13-21/1988, E. P. Smaraka Mandiram, Yogasala Road, Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri David, Supervisor of Savari Motors, Nadakkavu, Kozhikode is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
(4)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1553/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 29th September 2012.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to 22 workers [(1) സനിൽകുമാർ, വി., (2) രൂപേഷ്, കെ., (3) സബിത, പി. വി., (4) കെ. കെ. ശ്രീകല, (5) സുജിത, സി., (6) ദീപ്തി, കെ. പി., (7) സന്ദീപ്കുമാർ, എം., (8) അർച്ചന, എം., (9) സുഭാഷ്, കെ. വി., (10) രാജീവൻ, കെ., (11) റീന, കെ. വി., (12) ഗീത, യു., (13) സപ്ന, ടി., (14) രേഖ, വി., (15) അനിമോൾ, (16) മായ ദാമോദരൻ, (17) ഷൈജു, കെ., (18) മധു, എം. വി., (19) സുരേഷ്കുമാർ, കെ., (20) ശ്രീജേഷ്, പി., (21) സാജു, പി. കെ., (22) സന്തോഷ്, ആർ.] by the management of Kerala State Co-operative Hospital Complex and Centre for Advanced Medical Services, Pariyaram with effect from 30-9-2010 are justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the workers are entitled to ?
(3)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1552/2012/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri K. Abbobaker, Managing Partner, Arabian Gold Jewellery Works, Byepass Road, Kondotty, Malappuram (2) Sri A. Moitheen Kutty, S/o Kunhipokker, Ambalangadan Veedu, Melangadi P. O., Kondotty and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Saidalavi Alungal, S/o Avarankutty, Kinattingal Veedu, Kondotty Airport P. O., Malappuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri. Alungal Saidalavi, Security Staff, Arabian Gold Park, Kondotty by the management is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?
(5)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1593/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2012.
Thiruvananthapuram, 29th September 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri M. P. Abdul Rahman, S/o Chekootty Haji, Murinjampurayil Veedu, Thachampoyil P. O., Thamarassery via, Kozhikode (2) Sri K. P. Ismail, S/o Koyakutty, Kuttiparambil Veedu, Ekarool P. O., Unnikulam, Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri David, S., S/o T. S. John, S. T. Cottage, Near Central School, Karaparamb P. O., Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the President, Tatapuram Co-operative Store, Ltd. No. 269, Tatapuram, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 018 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri T. Y. Shamsu, Thevaruparambil House, Liberty Lane, Asoka Road, Kaloor P. O., Kochi-682 017 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to
Sri T. Y. Shamsu with effect from 24-7-2009 by the
management of Tatapuram Co-operative Store is
justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs he is
entitled to ?
By order of the Governor,
ABDURRAHMAN EAKKADAN,