©
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14 2012
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
No.
Vol. I
2012 ഡിസംബർ 11
27 തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ
നമ്പർ വാല്യം 1
} 11th December 2012
}
20th Agrahayana 1934 1934 അഗ്രഹായനം 20
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
adjudication;
ORDERS
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by {{^{{FOOTNOTE (1)}}}}
section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct G .O. (Rt.) No. 1818/2012/LBR.
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd November 2012.
to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal
will pass the award within a period of three months.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Group Manager, Lilly
ANNEXURE
Division, Manalaroo Estate, Padagiri P. O., Nelliampathy,
Palakkad-678 509 and the workman of the above referred
Whether the denial of employment to 11th DEC. 2012] KERALA GAZETTE 98 (2)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1819 /2012/LBR.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd Novemebr 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director, Chest Hospitals, Pavamani Road, Kozhikode (2) the Manager, Chest Hospital, Pavamani Road, Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kozhikode District Private Hospital & Medical Shop Workers' Union (CITU), CITU District Centre, Kozhikode-673 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri Jayanandan Pokkattu, Helper in Bus No. KL-10-J.7475 by the management is justifiable ?
If not, what are the relief he is entitled to ?
(4)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1821/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd Novemebr 2012.
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal from service of Smt. Udayakumari, Nursing Assistant, Chest Hospitals, Pavamani Road, Kozhikode by the management is justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to get ?
(3)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1820/2012/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Jolly, w/o Raju, Vallivila House, Pattikkad P. O., Kallidukku, Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri N. H. Ibrahim, Njavakkattil House, Vaniyambara P. O., Thrissur-680 652 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd Novemebr 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) the PTA President, Markazul Uloom English Senior Secondary School, Areekode Road, Kondotty, Malappuram District (2) Sri Abdul Jaleel, K. N., Principal, Markazul Uloom English Senior Secondary School, Areekode Road, Kondotty, Malappuram District and the workman of the months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri N. H. Ibrahim, Rubber Tapper by the owner of Rubber Estate, owned by Smt. Jolly, w/o Raju, Vallivila House, Pattikkad P. O., Kallidukku, Thrissur is justifiable ? If not, what remedy he is entitled to get ?