©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2013
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
2013 ഏപ്രിൽ 23
No.
Vol. II
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ വാല്യം 2
17
നമ്പർ
3rd Vaisakha 1935 1935 വൈശാഖം 3
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Labour and Rehabilitation Department necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 456/2013/LBR.
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Thiruvananthapuram, 11th March 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Abraham Tharakan, Managing Director, Amalgam Enterprises, Amalgam House, XXIV/1604, Plot No. 9, Bristo Road, Wellingdon Island, Kochi (2) The Manager, West Coast Refrigeration and Food Engineering Private Limited (Amalgam Group), Kuthiathode, Thuravoor P. O., Alappuzha and the workman of the above referred to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the claim for reinstatement after accepting retrenchment compensation of Sri K. X. Jacob, Fabricator in M/s. West Coast Refrigeration 23rd APRIL 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 60 (4) (2) G. O. (Rt.) No. 484/2013/LBR. G. O. (Rt.) No. 457/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.
Thiruvananthapuram, 11th March 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Pa1m Fibre (India) Private Limited, Pathirapally P. O., Alappuzha-688 521 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Alappuzha Coir Factory Workers Union (CITU), Reg. No. 1/67, Our Building, North of District Court, Thathampalli P.O., Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the terminaton of employment to Smt. Aji. V. R., Production Helper in Pa1m Fibre (India) Private Limited, Pathirapally by the management is justifiable? If so, what are the reliefs she is entitled to?
(3)
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, KEL, Mamala P.O., Kochi-682 305 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) General Secretary, KEL Employees Congress (INTUC), Mamala P. O. -682 305 (2) General Secretary, KEL Employees Union (CITU), Mamala P.O.-682 305 (3) General Secretary, KEL Workers Union (HMS), Mamala P.O.-682 305 (4) General Secretary, KEL Employees Organisation (AITUC), Mamala P. O.-682 305 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether there is discrimination in the promotion policy to the workers of KEL , Mamala Unit to that of other units of KEL at Kasargod and Kundara ? If so, what is the relief ?
(5)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 485/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.
G. O. (Rt.) No. 478/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th March 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Secretary, P.T.A., Kendriya Vidyalaya Shift-I, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram-4 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri R. Venu Gopalan Nair, Maniveena, Kurinchilakkode, Mundela P. O., Nedumangad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the terminaton of Sri Venu Gopalan Nair, Conductor, from the Service of opposite party management is justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing Director, Civil Supplies Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram (2) The Assistant Manager, Supplyco Depot, Koduvally, Palakutti and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. Velayudhan, Karimbarukuzhiyil, Kodenchery, Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri M. Velayudhan, Karimbarukuzhiyil (H) Kodenchery, Kozhikode by the management of Supplyco Depot, Koduvally, Kozhikode is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
23rd APRIL 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 61 (6) (8) G. O. (Rt.) No. 487/2013/LBR.G. O. (Rt.) No. 489/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Muhammed Koya, Proprietor, Moopans Hotel, Cheruvannur P. O., Feroke -673 631 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kozhikode District Commercial Employees Union, C.I.T.U., Kozhikode Mekhala Committee, Palayam Road, Kozhikode-1, in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Shri V. Muhammed by the Proprietor, Moopans Hotel, Cheruvannur, Feroke is justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to?
(7)
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Secretary, Keraleeya Ayurveda Samajam Hospital, Shornur, Palakkad District-679 123 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri. Sreeroop K. S., Kalikulangara, Thalassery P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri Sreeroop, K. S., Massager, Keraleeya Ayurveda Samajam Hospital by the Management is justifiable or not? If not, What relief he is entitled to?
(9)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 506/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 20th March 2013.
G. O. (Rt.) No. 488/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Proprietor, Delite Sweet Parlour, Round South, Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. P. Paul, S/o Paulose, Karerakkattil Veedu, Nedupuzha P. O., Thrissur-15 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) The Secretary, Valiya Koonampayikulam Sree Bhagavathy Kshetram Trust, Mulluvila, Vadakkevila P. O., Kollam, (2) The Principal, Valiya Koonampayikulathamma College of Engineering and Technology, Mulluvila, Vadakkevila P. O., Kollam, and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri. Suresh Babu, K., Aswathy, Puthalathazham, Vadakkevila P. O., Kollam, in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court, will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE 23rd APRIL 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 62 (10) the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
G. O. (Rt.) No. 515/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 21st March 2013.
ANNEXURE
Whether there is denial of employment to
Shri Shaji, Thappasseriyil, Kalpetta P. O. by the management of Arrapetta Estate, Harrison Malayalam Limited, Meppadi ? If so, what is the
remedy?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Arrappetta Estate, Meppadi P. O. and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri Shaji Thappasseriyil, Near AKG Bhavan, Kalpetta P. O. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
By order of the Governor,
RAMANKUTTY, C.,
Under Secretary to Government.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that