©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2013
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
2013 മേയ് 21
No.
Vol. II
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ വാല്യം 2
21
നമ്പർ
31st Vaisakha 1935 1935 വൈശാഖം 31
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
{{^{{FOOTNOTE (1)}}}}
G . O. (Rt.) No. 603/2013/LBR.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Octovia Kuries Private Limited, Perinjanam P. O.-680 686, Thrissur District and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri P. N. Radhakrishnan S/o Poyyara Narayanan Master (Late,) Mathilakam P. O., Whether the termination of Sri. P. N. Radhakrishnan from the services of Octovia Kuries (P) Ltd., Perinjanam is justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to get?
{{^{{FOOTNOTE (2)}}}}
G . O. (Rt.) No. 604/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.
Pin-680 685, Thrissur District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) the Manager, Kerala State Beverages Corporation Limited, Ware House, S.H. Mount P.O., Kottayam (2) Old Contractor Smt. Jagadamma, K. P., Convenor, Aiswarya Mahila Samajam,21st MAY 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 78 (4)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 606/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.
Areeparambu P.O., Kottayam (3) New Contractor: Smt. Salikkutty, Convenor, Aiswarya Kudumbasree Unit, Kerala State Beverages Corporation, Ware House, S.H. Mount P.O., Kottayam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala State Videsa Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union (C.I.T.U.), Kottayam District Committee, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Santhamma, N., Smt. Radhamani Prasannan, Smt. Pushpakumari, Smt. Usha Ravindran Workers, Kerala State Beverages Corporation Ltd., Ware House, S. H. Mount P. O., Kottayam by the management is justifiable ? If not what relief the workmen is entitled to ?
(3)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 605/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri K. R. Suresh Chandran, Dairy Manager, Milma, Kollam Dairy and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. Sasidharan, Krishnavilasom, Kattanam, Pallickkal P. O., Kayamkulam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Sasidharan by the Management of Milma Kollam Dairy is justifiable ? If not what relief the worker is entitled to ?
(5)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 678/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 17th April 2013.
Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) The Head Master, Govt. UPS, Vamanapuram-695 606 (2) The President (PTA), Govt. UPS, Vamanapuram-695 606 and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. B. Ambika, Thekkazhikom, Vamanapuram P. O., Thiruvananthapuram- 695 606 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Holy Family Convent English Medium High School, Aravila, Kavanad (P.O.), Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Quilon District Motor & Mechanical Workers Union, C.I.T.U. Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE 21st MAY 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 79 (6)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 679/2013/LBR.
(8)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 761/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Thiruvananthapuram, 17th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, M/s Travancore Rubber and Tea Company, Pattom (P. O.), Thiruvananthapuram-4 and the workmen of the above reffered establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kizhakkan Mekhala Plantation Workers Union, I.N.T.U.C. Thenmala Valley Unit, Kazhuthuruttty in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Sri Ganapathy by the Management is Justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get ?
(7)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 759/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Rehabilitation Plantations Limited, Punalur-691 305, Kollam District and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Government Rubber Plantation Thozhilali Union A.I.T.U.C. (H. O.), Punalur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of Sri Selvaraj Reg. No. 5402, Permanent worker by the management of Rehabilitation Plantation Limited, Punalur is justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
(9)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 762/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Manu, Managing Director, Quilon Foods Private Limited, QEE Cashew Company, Modeenmukku, Kureeppally, Kollam and the workmen of the above reffered establishment represented by Sri D. John, Secretary, Kerala Cashew Staff Centre CITU, CITU Bhavan, Kollam-691 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri R. Mohanachandran Nair, Proprietor, K1-24 B 3332 S/C, Prathibha, Neeleswaram P. O., Kottarakkara and the workmen of the above reffered establishment represented by the General Secretary, Quilon District Motor & Mechanical Workers Union, C.I.T.U. Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE 21st MAY 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 80 (10)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 763/2013/LBR.
ANNEXURE
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Varuna Aqua Products Private Limited, Plot No. 43, Kinfra Park, St. Xaviers College P.O., Thumba, Thiruvananthapuram-695 586 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri S. Sreekumar, Sankaravilasom, Chanthavila, Kattayikkonam P.O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 584 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Whether the demand for wages, revision etc. by the employees represented by Rado Tyres Employees Association, is justifiable or not ? The legal validity of the bi-partite settlement signed by the management & various trade unions on 3-9-2011 ? Whether the bi-partite settlement is binding upon to the employees representing Rado Tyres Employees Association (INTUC-I) ? If not, what are the reliefs the employees are entitled to ?
(12)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 765/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of Sri S. Sreekumar, from the service of Varuna Aqua Products Private Limited by the management is justifiable ? If so, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?
(11)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 764/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Hantex Weavery Unit, Oottukuzhi, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by Sri Kosalaramadas, President, All Kerala Textiles Workers Staff Federation (Reg. No. 423/83), Hantex Weavery Unit, Oottukuzhi, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the demand for parity of DA exists in the weavery unit to that exists in the garment unit is justifiable ? If so, what are the reliefs they are entitled to ?
(13)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 766/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Rado Tyres Limited, A. M. Road, Nellikuzhi P. O., Kothamangalam-686 691 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) the Secretary, Rado Tyres Employees Association (I.N.T.U.C.) C/o Rado Tyres Limited, Nellikuzhi, Kothamangalam, (2) the General Secretary, Rado Tyres Employees Union (C.I.T.U.), A.K.G. Bhavan, Kothamangalam, (3) the Secretary Ernakulam District Industrial Estate, Mazdoor Sangham (B.M.S), C/o Rado Tyres Limited, Nellikuzhi, Kothamangalam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Mangalam Publications, S.H. Mount P.O., Kottayam and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kottayam District Shop & Other Establishments Mazdoor Sangh, B.M.S. Office, T.B. Junction, M. L. Road, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
21st MAY 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 81(15)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 768/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the transfer of Smt. Manju Joseph, Subeditor from Kottayam to Kozhikode by the Management of Mangalam Publications is justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to ?
(14)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 767/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Director, Insight Security Services & Facilities Private Limited Punnakkamoodu, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) Kerala State Security Staff Association (CITU), CITU District Committee Office, Chirakkulam, G.P.O. (2) All Kerala Security Service Employees Association (INTUC), Govt. Quarters No. B6 Nethaji Nagar, Vikas Bhavan P.O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Chekmat Security Services, Karakkamandapam, Thiruvananthapuram-27 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) Kerala State Security Staff Association (CITU), CITU District Committee Office, Chirakkulam, G.P.O. (2) All Kerala Security Service Employees Association (INTUC), Govt. Quarters No. B6 Nethaji Nagar, Vikas Bhavan P.O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the Security employees of Insight Security Services & Facilities Private Limited are eligible to get 20% Bonus ? If yes, what relief they are entitled to ?
By order of the Governor,
RAMANKUTTY, C.,
Under Secretary to Government.
Whether the demand for 20% Bonus to the Security employees of Chekmat Security Services, Karakkamandapam, Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ? If yes, what relief they are entitled to ?