©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2013
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
No.
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ Vol. I I വാല്യം 2
22
നമ്പർ
2013 മേയ് 28 7th Jyaishta 1935 1935 ജ്യേഷ്ഠം 7
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Labour and Rehabilitation Department Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
{{^{{FOOTNOTE (1)}}}}
G .O. (Rt.) No. 770/2013/LBR.
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager , Glenmary Estate, Peermade and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Arpputham, C. R. No. 2154, Glenmary Estate, Peermade represented by the General Secretary, Kerala S tate Estate Workers Union (INTUC), Peermade in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
ANNEXURE
Whether the action of the management in superannuating Sri Arpputham, C. R. No. 2154 of Glenmary Estate, Peermade with effect from 21-9-2011 instead of 22-3-2013 (date of birth as per school records) is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
(2)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 771/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director ,28th M AY 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 84 (4)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 788/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 29th April 2013.
Rehabilitation Plantations Limited, Tholikkodu P . O., Punalur and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary , Kollam District, Plantation Workers Union, C.I.T .U., Punalur, in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Damodaran, Reg. No. 1477, Tapping W orker of Ayiranalloor Estate Rehabilitation Plantations Limited, Punalur is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?
(3)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 772/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between S ri Roy, Veliyath House, Veliyath Plantation, Pynkulam P .O., Cheruthuruthy, Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri T. K. Sasi s/o Kuttappan, Thattamparambil House, Purappuzha P.O., Idukki in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of the employment to Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.
Sri Sasi s/o Kuttappan, Thattamparambil House, Purappuzha P.O., Idukki by employer Sri Roy , Veliyath House, Veliyath Plantation P.O., Pynkulam, Cheruthuruthy is justifiable ? If not, what are the relief he is entitled to get ?
(5)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 789/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 29th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director , Private Eye Security Services, 80 Feet Road, Indira Nagar , Bangalore and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by (1) Kerala State Security S taff Association (CITU) , CITU District Committee Of fice, Chirakkulam, G .. P. O., (2) All Kerala Security Service Employees Association (INTUC), Govt. Quarters No. B6, Nethaji Nagar , Vikas Bhavan P . O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the demand for 20% Bonus to the Security employees of Private Eye Security Services, Indira Nagar , Bangalore is Justifiable?
If yes, what releif they are entitled to?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between S ri Roy, Veliyath House, Veliyath Plantation, Pynkulam P .O., Cheruthuruthy, Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Jomon, K. P . s/o K. J. Philip, Kanjiramalayil House, Puthuveli P . O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
28th M AY 2013] KERALA GAZETTE 85ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of the employment to Whether the denial of employment to
Sri K. P . Jomon s/o K. J. Philip, Kanjiramalayil
House, P . O. Puthuveli, Kottayam by employer
Sri Roy , Veliyath House, Veliyath Plantation,
Sri Madhavan s/o Sankunni, Kattil House, Veliyath Plantation P. O., Pynkulam, Cheruthuruthy is justifiable ? If not, what are the relief he is entitled to get ?
Pynkulam P. O., Cheruthuruthy is justifiable ? If
By order of the Governor , not, what other relief he is entitled to get ?
RAMANKUTTY, C., (6)
Under Secretary to Government.
G .O. (Rt.) No. 790/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 29th April 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between S ri Roy, Veliyath House,
Veliyath Plantation, Pynkulam P .O., Cheruthuruthy, Thrissur
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri Madhavan, K. S. s/o Sankunni, Kattil House,
Killimangalam P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal
will pass the award within a period of three months.