©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
2013
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
No.
Vol. II
തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ വാല്യം 2
}
19th November 2013 2013 നവംബർ 19
46
നമ്പർ
} 28th Karthika 1935 1935 കാർത്തികം 28
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1554/2013/LBR.
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Paul Wilson, Regional Manager, Regional Office, Kosamattom Finance Ulloor, Pongummoodu, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. Manoharan, Sarvasree, Karichal, Kazhuvoor P. O. Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri M. Manoharan, Manager, Kosamattom Finance Limited, Balaramapuram Branch by the management is justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs he is (2)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1555/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Proprietor, Krishna Traders, Balaramapuram, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri D. N. Jayakumar, D. N. Nivas, Moovalloorkonam, Naruvamoodu P. O.,
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of service of Smt. R. Rajitha by the management of Elasto Tapes, Kochuveli, Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ? If not, what are the relief she is entitled to ?
(4)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1625/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2013.
Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri D. N. Jayakumar by the management of Krishna Traders, Balaramapuram, Thiruvanantha- puram district is justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?
(3)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1613/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri A. V. Varu, Proprietor, Fashion Offset Printers, Pallikkulam Road, Thrissur-1 and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt. Radha, P., W/o. Vellalath Sunil Kumar, Anakkad, Kanjani P. O., Thrissur-680 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Thiruvananthapuram, 11th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Elasto Tapes Kochuveli, Thiruvananthapuram and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt. Rajitha, R., Kattil Veedu, Thekkumbhagam, Kadakkavoor P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of Smt. Radha, P. by the employer (Fashion Offset Printers, Pallikkulam Road, Thrissur-1) is justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to get?
(5)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1706/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th October 2013.
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri M. K. Murali, S/o Kannan, Maruthoor House, Vadavanoor, Chittur, Palakkad (2) Sri M. A. Titto, S/o Antony, Muyalan House, Varantharapilli P. O. Mukundapuram Taluk, Thrissur (3) Sri A. U. Abdul Hakim, Perutheni Street, Puthunagaram, Palakkad and the workmen the award within a period of three months.
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
(7)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1752/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 11th October 2013.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to (1) Sri M. Manikandan, Driver, (2) Sri R. Sajeev, Conductor, KL-09/P-3045 Bus, Murali Bus Service by the management is justifiable or not, If not, what relief they are entitled to?
(6)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1751/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Hospital Complex & Centre for Advanced Medical Services, Pariyaram, Kannur and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri C. M. Rajesh s/o P. Raghavan, Kaara P. O., Peravoor, Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
Thiruvananthapuram, 11th October 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the President, Kannur Co-operative Urban Bank Limited No. 1534, Kannur-2 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala Co-operative Employees Front, Kannur Taluk Committee, Kannur-2 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri C. M. Rajesh, Nursing Assistant by the management of Kerala State Co-operative Hospital Complex & Centre for Advanced Medical Services, Pariyaram with effect from 20-1-2008 is justifiable or not? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to?
By order of the Governor,
RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,
Under Secretary to Government.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether Sri Suneesh, working as appraiser in Kannur Co-operative Urban Bank is eligible to get the Pay Scale of Junior Clerk with effect from 1-1-2006 ?
2. If he is eligible what is the quantum of monetary benefits he may deserve from the management ?