©
Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14 2013
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
No.
Vol. II
10th December 2013 2013 ഡിസംബർ 10
49 തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ
നമ്പർ വാല്യം 2
} }
19th Agrahayana 1935 1935 അഗ്രഹായനം 19
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1804/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd October 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Group Manager, Thankamala Estate, Vandiperiyar P. O., Peerumade, Idukki District and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the Sri. Swamidas, C. R. No. 2714, Supervisor, Line No. 453 (Old), 372 (New), Thankamala Estate, Vandiperiyar, P. O., Peerumade, Idukki District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct adjudication;
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peerumade). The
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 three months.
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication ANNEXURE
to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peerumade). The Whether the alleged denial of employment to Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
Sri Swamidas, C. R. No. 2714, Supervisor, Thankamala Estate, Vandiperiyar by the management from 7-3-2011 is justifiable or not?
ANNEXURE
If not, what relief the worker is entitled to?
(2)
The Whether the alleged denial of employment to
Smt. Mercy, C. R. No. 2786, worker G. O. (Rt.) No. 1805/2013/LBR.
of Thankamala E s t a t e , Va n d i p e r i y a r Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd October 2013.
bythemanagement from January 2013
justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the
worker is entitled to ?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Group Manager, Thankamala Estate, Vandiperiyar P. O., Peerumade, Idukki District. and the workman of the above referred
establishment Smt. Mercy, (C. R. No. 2786), Line No. 452
By order of the Governor, (Old), 371 (New), Thankamala Estate, Vandiperiyar P. O.,
Peerumade, Idukki District in respect of matters mentioned
in the annexure to this order;
RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,