© കേരള സർക്കാർ
Government of Kerala 2014
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
കേരള ഗസററ്
KERALA GAZETTE
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
2014 ജനുവരി 14
വാല്യം 3
തിരുവനന്തപുരം,
ചൊവ്വ
Vol. III
}
Thiruvananthapuram,
Tuesday
നമ്പർ 14th January 2014 1189 മകരം 1
No. 2
} 1st Makaram 1 189 1935 പൌഷം 24
24th Pousha 1935
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1890/2013/LBR.
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Thiruvananthapuram, 15th November 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the P resident Karuvarakundu Service Co-operative Bank, Tharish Karuvarakundu, Malappuram District and the workmen of the above referred establishment (1) Sri P. Ahammed Kutty , Pattanathu H o u s e , P a n d i k k a d , P. O . , M a l a p p u r a m - 6 7 6 5 2 1 (2) Smt. M. Ayishumma, Kalapparambil House, Kallamoola, Mambattumoola P .O., Malappuram and the workman represented by the District Secretary Kerala Co-operative Employees Front Nannambra Service (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to S mt. Ayishumma, Secretary and Sri P . Ahammed Kutty , Chief Accountant by the management of K aruvarakundu Service Co-operative Bank Limited is justifiable ? If 14th J AN. 2014] KERALA GAZETTE 6 (2)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1943/2013/LBR.
ANNEXURE
Whether the demands raised by the General Secretary , Thiruvananthapuram, 28th November 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Sajan Philip, Cheruthuruthy Plantations, Varikkanakkuzhy Veedu, Vettikkattiri, Cheruthuruthy-679 531 (2) Samuval Philip, Cheruthuruthy Plantations, Varikkanakkuzhy Veedu, Vettikkattiri, Cheruthuruthy-679 531 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Harikumar alias Sunny , Eluvinkil House, Vettikkattiri P.O., Panjal-679 531 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Bharatheeya Chits and Masdoor Sangam (BMS) regarding Pay S tructure, Transfer, Promotion, Increment, Arrears of wages of the employees of Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Company Corporate Office, "Sree Gokulam Towers", No. 66, Arcoat Road, Chennai-600 024 are Justifiable or not ? If yes, what are the reliefs they are entitled to ?
(4)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1956/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd December 2013.
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Sri Harikumar alias Sunny , Worker Cheruthuruthy Plantations, Cheruthuruthy , Thrissur by the management is justifiable ? If not what relief he is entitled to ?
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1955/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager C.H. Muhammed Koya Memorial Higher Secondary School, Vadakumbad, P.O. Vadakumbad, Ramanthali, Payyannur , Kannur and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri P .V. Premarajan, s/o C. Damodharan Nambiar, 'Athira', Aduthila, P.O. Pazhayangadi, Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur . The Labour Court will pass Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd December 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director , Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Company (P) Limited, Sree Gokulam Towers, No. 66, Arcoat Road, Chennai-600 024 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary , Bharatheeya Chits and Masdoor Sangam (BMS), BMS Office, Kallai Road, Kozhikode-673 002 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of the employment to Sri P. V. Premarajan who was a Non-teaching staf f by the Management of C.H. Mohammed Koya Memorial Higher Secondary School is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?
(5)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1986/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 6th December 2013.
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Group Manager , Poabs Enterprises (Pvt.) Limited, Thengakal Estate, Vandiperiyar P.O. and the workman of the above referred establishment 14th J AN. 2014] KERALA GAZETTE 7 And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
(7)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1988/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 6th December 2013.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peerumade). The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Smt. Sukeshni, Junior Assistant, Thengakal Estate, Vandiperiyar with effect from 16-3-2012 is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?
(6)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1987/2013/LBR.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director , Pothys Textiles, Ayurveda College Junction, Thiruvananthapuram-1 and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. C. Saranya, Pooja Veedu, TC. 27/1493, Chettikulangara, Vanchiyoor P .O., Thiruvananthapuram-35 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Thiruvananthapuram, 6th December 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Hindusthan Latex Employees Welfare Society , Hindusthan Latex Limited., Post Box No. 2, P eeroorkada, Thiruvananthapuram-5 and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri V. Muraleedharan Pillai, "Nilavu", Arampunna, Elabmal P . O., Punaloor , Kollam District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of service of
Smt. C. Saranya, S ales Girl of Pothys Textiles, M.G. Road, Thiruvananthapuram by forcing her to resign with threat by the Management is justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?
(8)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1995/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 9th December 2013.
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of service of
Sri V. Muraleedharan Pillai, Driver of Hindusthan Latex Welfare Society by the Management is justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) Smt. B. Sathi, Managing Partner, Hotel Sudharsan, Parameshwer Nagar , Hospital Road, Kollam-1, (2) Sri Chandramohan (Power of Attorney Holder), Manager , Hotel Sudharsan, Kollam-1 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by Sri Jayaprakash, General Secretary , Quilon Hotel and Tea Shop Workers Union (INTUC), Kollam-691 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
14th J AN. 2014] KERALA GAZETTE 8Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
കൊല്ലം ഹോട്ടൽ സുദർശനിൽ ക്വയിലോൺ ഹോട്ടൽ ആന്റ ് റ്റീഷോപ്പ് വർക്കേഴ്സ് യൂണിയൻ (എെ. എൻ. റ്റി. യു. സി.) എന്ന ട്രേഡ് യൂണിയന്റെ നേതൃത്വ ത്തിൽ ജീവനക്കാർ നടത്തിവരുന്ന പണിമുടക്ക് സമരം നിയമവിധേയവും ന്യായീകരിക്കത്തക്കതു മാണോ? ആണെങ്കിൽ ജീവനക്കാർക്ക് മാനേജ്മെന്റിൽ നിന്നും ലഭിക്കേ≠ അവകാശ ആനുകൂല്യങ്ങൾ എന്തെല്ലാം ?
By order of the Governor ,
RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,