Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

click here for IIIF manifest

© കേരള സർക്കാർ

Government of Kerala 2014

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

കേരള ഗസററ്

KERALA GAZETTE

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

2014 സെപ്റ്റംബർ 23

വാല്യം 3

നമ്പർ

തിരുവനന്തപുരം,

ചൊവ്വ

Thiruvananthapuram, Vol. III

}

Tuesday

37

No.

} 23rd September 2014 1190 കന്നി 7 7th Kanni 1190 1936 ആശ്വിനം 1 1st Aswina 1936

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1064/2014/LBR.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between Sri. S. Loganayagam, General Manager, Visudira Impex Private Limited, No. XI/130-C, K.P. Road, Palakkadavu, Near S.P.M. Auditorium, Kilikolloor, Kollam-691 004 and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt. Prameela Sudheer, Mithun Cottage, Valathungal P.O., Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

Whether the denial of Employment of Smt. Prameela Sudheer, Accountant in M/s. Visudira Impex Private Limited by the management of Visudira Impex Private Limited is justifiable ? If not what relief she is entitled to get ?

(2)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1067/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for adjudication;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wages to Smt. S. Sarojini according to various wage board recommendation is justifiable or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(3)

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wages to Smt. K.K. Thankamma according to various wage board recommendation is justifiable or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(5)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1072/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1068/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Express Publications (Madurai) Limited (The New Indian Express), Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-17 and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt.M.K. Hymavathy, Karathattuparambu Manakkattu Veedu, Chittur Road, Near Semitheri, Kochi-18 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wages to Smt. M.K. Hymavathy according to various wage board recommendation is justifiable or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists betwee The Manager, Su and Park Institutions Private Limited, Near N.S.S. Hospital, Edappally P.O., Kochi-682 024 and the workman of the above referred establishment Kum. P. K. Nadeera, Pallithottam Veettil, Kollamkodi mugal, Thrikkakkara P.O., in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of Employment to Kum. P. K. Nadeera, by the management of Su and Park Institutions Private Limited, Edappally is justifiable or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(6)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1073/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

(4)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1070/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the H.R. Manager, G4S-Secure Solutions (India) Private Limited, House No. 34/259, N.H. Bypass, Jawan Road, Edappally, Ernakulam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the Chief Patron, All Kerala Security Services Employees Association, INTUC, Labour Port Office, Ernakulam North, Kalabhavan Road, Kochin-18 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

ANNEXURE

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period three months.

Whether the denial of employment of Sri Aloysious Gonsalvez, Medicine Supplier, May Fair Pharma, Pulamon, Kottarakkara by the employer is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?

ANNEXURE

By order of the Governor,

RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,

Under Secretary to Government.

Whether the transfer of Sri Joshwa, C.J. by the management of G4S-Secure Solutions (India) Private Limited, House No. 34/259, N.H. Bypass, Jawan Road, Edappally, Ernakulam and subsequently denying employment at Ernakulam is justifiable or not? If not, what are the relief he is entitled to?

(7)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1083/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Sri Sankara Vidyalaya, Kizhakkenada, Vaikom-686 141 and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. Ambika Devi, C., Sivatheertham, Kizhakkenada, Vaikom P.O., Kottayam-686 141 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of Employment to Smt. Ambika Devi, C. Clerk with effect from 13-5-2013 by the management of Sri Sankara Vidyalaya Vaikom is justifiable ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?

(8)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1084/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Thomaskutty, Proprietor, May Fair Pharma, Pharmaceutical Distributors, Plavaramukalil Building, Door No. K.P.3/1506, Pulamon, Kottarakkara, Kollam and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Aloysious Gonsalvez, Bright House, Kripa Nagar-35, Kottarakkara P.O. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;