GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 55/AIL/Lab./J/2011, dated 9th March 2011)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Award in I.D. No. 7/2009, dated 2-12-2010 of the Labour Court, Puducherry in respect of the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. EID Parry (India) Limited (New Horizon Sugar Mills) and Thiru G. Bharath Bahadur and 12 others over non- employment has been received;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read with the notification issued in Labour Department's G.O. Ms. No.20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said Award shall be published in the official gazette, Puducherry.
(By order)
G. MALAR KANNAN, Joint Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Thiru D. Soundararajan, counsel for petitioner and M/s. T.S. Gopaland & Co. and Thiru L. Swaminathan, counsel for respondent and upon perusing the case records, this court made the following:
ORDER
This industrial dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government under section 10(1)(e) of the Industrial Disputes Act in G. O. Rt. No. 68/Lab./2009/AIL/J, dated 8-5-2009, the Government made the following reference:
(1) Whethere t h e d i s p u t e r a i s e d b y 1 . G. B h a r a t h B a h a d u r, 2 . T. N e e l a k a n d a n 3. B. Krishna Bahadur, 4. D. Jalak Raj, 5. A. Bal Bahadur 6. M. Ram Bahadur, 7. P. Bharat Bahadur, 8. Gana Prasad Sharma, 9. T. Karna Bahadur, 10. Arjun K.C., 11 . P u s p a B a h a d u r, 1 2 . N a n d a P r a s a d Te w a r i , 13. Chandra Bahadur, Puducherry against the management of M/s. E.I.D. Parry (India) Limited (New Horizon Sugar Mills), Ariyur, Puducherry over non- employment is justified or not?
(2) If justified, to what relief, the workmen are entitled to?
BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PONDICHERRY
Present : Thiru T. MOHANDASS, M.A., M.L., Presiding Officer, II Additional District Judge, Pondicherry.
(3) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed ?
Dated, the 2nd day of December 2010
I.D. No. 7/09
Today petition was called. Counsel for petitioners and counsel for management present. Endorsement m a d e b y t h e co u n s e l f o r p e t i t i o n e r s a s "The petitioners received their settlement hence this industrial dispute may be closed as against this petitioners". Hence the reference is closed.
Written and pronounced by me in the open court on the 2nd day of December 2010.
T. MOHANDASS, Presiding Officer, II Additional District Judge, Pondicherry.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY HOME DEPARTMENT
1. G. Bharath Bahadur 2. T. Neelakandan 3. B. Krishna Bahadur 4. D. Jalak Raj 5. A. Bal Bahadur 6. M. Ram Bahadur 7. P. Bharat Bahadur 8. Gana Prasad Sharma 9. T. Karna Bahadur 10. Arjun K.C 11. Puspa Bahadur 12. Nanda Prasad Tewari 13. Chandra Bahadur . . Petitioners (G.O. M. No. 16, dated 23rd February 2011)
Versus
The Managing Director, M/s. E.I.D. Parry (India) Limited (New Horizon Sugar Mills), Ariyur, Villanur Commune, Kandamangalam Post, Puducherry - 605 102 . . Respondent
ORDER