GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (b) If justified, to what relief, the petitioner is entitled to?
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(c) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms (G.O. Rt. No. 59/Lab./AIL/J/2013, dated 29th A p r i l 2013) NOTIFICATION
Whereas, an Award in I.D. No. 86/2012, dated 23-11-2012 of the Labour Court, Puducherry in respect of the industrial dispute between the Managing Director, M/s. Superfil Products Limited, Puducherry and one Thiru P. Alagappan, over non-employment has been received;
of money, if it can be so computed.
2. Today this petition was called. Petitioner called absent. Respondent counsel present. Memo. filed by the respondent as settled under section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and recorded. Hence this reference is closed.
Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this 23rd day of November, 2012.
T. MOHANDASS, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Puducherry.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read with the n o t i f i c a t i o n i s s u e d i n L a b o u r D e p a r t m e n t ' s G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said award shall be published in the official gazette, Puducherry.
(G.O. Rt. No. 60/Lab./AIL/J/2013, dated 29th April 2013)
(By order)
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
NOTIFICATION
BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru T. MOHANDASS, M.A. M.L., Presiding Officer, Puducherry.
Whereas, an Award in I.D. No. 12/2011, dated 24-8-2012 of the Labour Court, Puducherry in respect of the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Abirami Soap Works, Puducherry and one Thiru J. Murugadoss, over non-employment has been received;
Dated, the 23rd day of November 2012
I.D. No. 86/2012
P. Alagappan . . Petitioner
Versus
The Managing Director, M/s. Superfil Products Limited, Mangalam, Puducherry. . . Respondent Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read with the notification issued in Labour Department's G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said award shall be published in the official gazette, Puducherry.
(By order)
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY
This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Thiru R. Ilancheliyan and Tmt. R. Thilagavathy, Advocates for the respondent and petitioner called absent and upon perusing the case records, this court made the following :
ORDER
Present : Thiru T. MOHANDASS, M.A. M.L.,
Presiding Officer.
Dated, the 24th day of August 2012
I.D. No. 12/2011
This industrial dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government under section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act in G.O. Rt. No. 176/AIL/Lab./ J/2012, dated 9-10-2012. The Government made the following references:
J. Murugadoss . . Petitioner
Versus
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner Thiru P. Alagappan against the management of M/s. Superfil Products Limited, Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified?
The Management, M/s. Abirami Soap Works, Sembiapalayam, Puducherry. . . Respondent14 May 2013] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 471 BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Thiru I. Ilankumar, Advocate for the petitioner and Thiru R. Ilancheliyan, Advocate for the respondent and upon perusing the case records, Present : Thiru T. MOHANDASS, M.A., M.L., Presiding Officer.
Dated, the 26th day of December 2012.
this court made the following :
I.D. No. 7/2012
ORDER
This industrial dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government under section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act in G.O. Rt. No. 97/AIL/Lab./J/2011, dated 10-5-2011.
2. Today this petition was called. Petitioner called The President,
NTS Paper Mill Desia Thozhil Sangam,
No. 28, Saint Therease Street,
Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Versus
absent. Joint memo. of compromise already filed by respondent counsel. Petition is dismissed for default.
No costs.
Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 24th day of August 2012.
The Managing Director, M/s. Enteeyes Paper and Board Mill Private Limited, No. 211, Chetty Street, Puducherry.
. . Respondent
T. MOHANDASS,
Presiding Officer, Labour Court,
Puducherry.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Thiru S. Sridhar, Advocate for the petitioner and Thiru K. Parthiban, Advocate for the respondent and upon persuing the case records, this court made the following :
ORDER
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 62/Lab./AIL/J/2013, dated 6th May 2013)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, an award in I. D. No. 7/2012, dated 26-12-2012 of the Labour Court, Puducherry in respect of the industrial dispute between the Managing Director, Enteeyes Paper and Board Mill Private Limited, Puducherry and the President NTS Paper Mill Desia Thozhil Sangam, Puducherry, over full and final settlement of dues has been received;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read This industrial dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government under section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act in G.O. Rt. No. 21/AIL/ Lab./J/2012, dated 29-2-2012.
2. Today this petition was called. Claim statement not filed. Petitioner called absent. Respondent present. Hence this reference is closed. No costs.
Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 26th day of December 2012.
T. MOHANDASS, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Puducherry.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
with the notification issued in Labour Department's (G.O. Rt. No. 63/Lab./AIL/J/2013, dated 6th May 2013) G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said award shall be published in the official gazette, Puducherry.
(By order)
NOTIFICATION
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
Whereas, an award in I. D. No. 87/2012, dated 23-11-2012 of the Labour Court, Puducherry in respect of the industrial dispute between the Managing Director, M/s. Abirami MRI Scan Center, Arumparthapuram, P u d u c h e r r y a n d o n e T mt. V. Janaki, o v e r non- employment has been received;
472 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [14 May 2013 BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRYI.D. No.(L) 87/2012
V. Janaki
. . Petitioner
Versus
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read with the notification issued in Labour Department's G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour ) that the said award shall be published in the official gazette, Puducherry.
(By order)
The Managing Director,
M/s. Abirami MRI Scan Center,
Arumparthapuram. . . Respondent COMPROMISE MEMO FILLED BY THE PETITIONER
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
I am the petitioner herein and I state that I have filed above numbered petition for non-employment and other benefits.
I herewith submit that I had approached the BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY Present : Thiru T. MOHANDASS, M.A., M.L., Presiding Officer.
respondent for settlement and herewith state that we have arrived at a compromise and I agree to receive a sum of rupees ninety-five thousand only (` 95,000).
Dated, the 23rd day of November, 2012
I.D. No. 87/2012
V. Janaki
. . Petitioner I state that I have received a demand draft for an amount of ` 95,000 (Rupees ninety-five thousand only) vide Demand Draft No. 6657522, dated 22-11-2012 drawn at Indian Overseas Bank, Manjakuppam Branch,
Versus
The Managing Director, M/s. Abirami MRI Scan Center, Arumparthapuram,
. . Respondent This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Thiru G.S. Prabagaran, Advocate for the petitioner and Thiru C.T. Ramesh, Advocate for the respondent and upon perusing the case records, this court made the following :
ORDER
This industrial dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government under section 10 (1) (e) of the Industrial Disputes Act in G.O. Rt. No. 180/AIL/Lab./J/2012, dated 16-10-2012.
2. Today this petition was called. Petitioner present. Petitioner counsel and respondent counsel present. Compromise memo. filed as the matter is settled out of court by receiving ` 95,000 through demand draft by the petitioner from respondent counsel. Reference is closed as the matter is compromised and settled amicably. No costs. Compromise memo. will form part of orders.
Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this 23rd of November 2012.
Cuddalore in my favour.
I herewith pray that this Honourable Court may record my full satisfaction and I undertake that I will not raise any claims in this regard in the future.
Hence I pray that this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass necessary order in the interest of justice as the matter has been settled.
Sd.
Sd.
Respondent PETTITIONER.
Abirami MRI
3-A. Villianur Main Road
Arumparthapuram
Puducherry-605 110
Amflºƒˆ ∂´∑ ÷Õm ƒ\B WÆk™∫Ô^ \uÆD k¬‡A mÁ≈ (∂´∑ gÁð ✓ÈkÁÔ ®ı 11/÷ƒW/ºÔV.3/2013/312. ÂV^ 2013 } ∞©´_ | 9 {.)
gÁð
T. MOHANDASS,
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Puducherry.
Amflºƒˆ \VWÈD, ÿÂ'¶©✓V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[, Ô_\ı¶✓D, ∂Ú^tz x›m\VˆBD\[, ∂Ú^tz sÂVBÔÏ º>k¸>V™D ÷ À k K k È Ô ∂ ´ ∑ g Áð ✓ È k Á Ô ®ı 44/÷ƒW./ ºÔV.3/2003, ÂV^ 21á8á2003á[ JÈD WBt¬Ô©✓'¶ E≈©A ∂]ÔVˆBV_ WÏk˛¬Ô©✓'| kÚ˛≈m.