Puducherry Gazette, No. 26, 30 June 2015

30 June 2015] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 461

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 15, dated 15th June 2015)

ORDER

The G.O. Ms. No. 152, dated 24-11-2005 of the Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Puducherry empowers the District Magistrate to cancel the Caste/Community Certificates (SC, OBC and MBC) in consultation with the members of the District Committee.

2. The residents of the Union territory of Puducherry who have migrated from other States/Union Territories and settled down in this Union Territory are issued Caste Certificates by the Revenue authorities based on the previous certificates issued by the authorities of the States/Union Territories from which they have migrated. Any certificate issued based on false representation or any certificate issued by oversight needs to be cancelled when it is learnt that the certificate has been erroneously issued.

3. But, the words "(SC, OBC and MBC)" in para 10 of the said Government Order restrains the District Magistrate from cancelling a Scheduled Tribe Certificate which has been issued based on a certificate obtained fraudulently. The Hon'ble High Court while allowing the Order, dated 19-1-2015 in W.P. No. 30955/2014 of the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras had observed that 'the respondents are at liberty to deal with the subject of cancellation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates if any such power is conferred on the competent authority to act, in accordance with law'.

giving reasonable opportunity to the affected applicant/parent/guardian. Any authority lower than the rank of District Magistrate is not competent to cancel the certificate. For the purpose of cancellation of the certificate, the District Committee is constituted with the following composition:-

1. District Magistrate, Puducherry/ . . Chairman Karaikal.

2. Director, Adi-Dravidar Welfare . . Member Department, Puducherry. (in respect of SC/ST Certificates). Director, Social Welfare Department, Puducherry. ( i n r e s p e c t o f a l l o t h e r C a s t e / Community Certificates other than SC/ST Certificate.)

3. Superintendent of Police (Vigilance) . . Member 4. H ea d o f D ep ar t me nt o r an y . . Member P r o f e s s o r o f A n t h r o p o l o g y Department, Pondicherry University, Puducherry.

5. Any two non-official members . . Member selected by the existing members.

6. Special Officer, Office of the Special/ . . Member- Additional Secretary (Revenue), Secretary. Puducherry in respect of Puducherry District comprising of Puducherry, Mahe and Yanam regions/Deputy Collector (Revenue), Kar aikal in respect of Karaikal District.

6. All other procedures/instructions contained in the G.O. Ms. No. 152, dated 24-11-2005 of the Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Puducherry remain the same.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

Dr. V. CANDAVELOU, I.A.S., Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Revenue).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER 4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its order, dated 9-8-1996 in the case of Indian Bank Vs. Satyam Fibres India Private Limited held that, the administrative authorities have inherent powers to recall or revoke their own orders if such order was obtained by playing fraud on such public authority. As a necessary corollary if something is do ne b y p ub lic autho rity at the behest of a person who played fraud, the same public authority can nullify that was done as vitiated by fraud. Under section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897 (Central Act No. X of 1897), an authority who has power to issue, inter alia, orders has also power to rescind such order.

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2014-15.

Puducherry, the 15th June 2015.

5. Therefore, para 10 of G.O. Ms. No. 152, dated 24-11-2005 cited above is amended as hereunder:

"10. Regarding the cancellation of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe and all other Caste/ Community Certificates, the District Magistrate shall cancel the Caste/Community Certificate in consultation with the Members of District Committee and also by

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark Certificate, under Register Number 328763 of March 1996, in respect of A. Anandakumar an ex-pupil of Thamizh Thendral Thiru Vika Government High School, Puducherry462 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [30 June 2015 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 47/AIL/Lab./J/2014, dated 16th June 2015)

is reported to have been lost and beyond the scope of recovery, it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate. If the original certificate is to be found by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of Government Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

N. RAMALINGAM, Chief Educational Officer.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Private Limited, Puducherry over transfer of employee M/s. P.S. Mary in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2014-15.

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Puducherry, the 15th June 2015.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark Certificate, under Register Number 369310 of March 1999, in respect of B. Vanaja, an ex-pupil of Government Girls' Higher Secondary School, Kadirkamam is reported to have been lost and beyond the scope of recovery, it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate. If the original certificate is to be found by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of Gover nment Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

N. RAMALINGAM, Chief Educational Officer.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2014-15.

ANNEXURE

Puducherry, the 15th June 2015.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark Certificate, under Register Number 488481of March 2005, in respect of N. Manivannan, an ex-pupil of Bharathi Government Higher Secondary School, Bahour is reported to have been lost and beyond the scope of recovery, it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate. If the original certificate is to be found by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of Government Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union against the management of M/s. Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Private Limited, Puducherry over transfer of employee M/s. P.S. Mary from Puducherry to Coporate Office Chennai by an act of motivation and victimisation is justified or not?

If justified what relief she is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)A. RAJARATHINAM, N. RAMALINGAM, Chief Educational Officer. Under Secretary to Government (Labour). 30 June 2015] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 463 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 48/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 16th June 2015)

(G.O. Rt. No. 49/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 16th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division), Puducherry and its workman Thiru R. Muthumanickam over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether t h e d i s p u t e r a i s e d b y Thiru R. Muthumanickam against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division), Puducherry and its workman Thiru S. Prabakaran, over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru S. Prabakaran, against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)A. RAJARATHINAM, A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour). Under Secretary to Government (Labour). 464 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [30 June 2015 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 50/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 17th June 2015)

(G.O. Ms. No. 11/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division), Puducherry and its workman Thiru K. Iyyanar, S/o. Krishnamoorthy over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Thiru D. Satchinathan, Senior Accounts Officer, Office of the Council of Ministers, Puducherry is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab/1., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT FINANCE DEPARTMENT

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to (G.O. Ms. No. 12/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015) Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Thiru S. Srinivasaraghavan, Junior Accounts Officer, Department of Art and Culture, Puducherry is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru K. Iyyanar, (G.O. Ms. No. 13/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015) S/o. Krishnamoorthy against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Tmt. M. Sudharma, Junior Accounts Officer, Division-I Electricity Department, Puducherry is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU, A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Finance). Under Secretary to Government (Labour). 30 June 2015] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 465 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

ANNEXURE

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 14/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Thiru A. Sounthirarajan, Junior Accounts Officer, Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries, Branch Office, Karaikal is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)

(a) Whether t h e d i s p u t e r a i s e d b y Thiru N. Narayanasamy, against the management of M/s. Poorvika Mobile World, Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) Whether the claim of the petitioner for the reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him for his treatment at PIMS, since he met with an accident during the course of employment and his claim of disablement compensation as per Act is justified? If justified,what relief he is entitled to?

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

————

(G.O. Rt. No. 52/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

(G.O. Rt. No. 53/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the managemant of M/s. Poorvika Mobile World, Puducherry and its workman Thiru N. Narayanasamy, over non-employment and disablement compensation in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the S&S Power Switchgear Limited Employees Union against the management of M/s. Sri Ram Charitable Trust, Puducherry and its workman Thiru D. Vadivelu, over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of466 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [30 June 2015 reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru D. Vadivelu, against the management of M/s. Sri Ram Charitable Trust, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru P. Jothilingam against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited, (Detergent Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

(G.O. Rt. No. 55/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

NOTIFICATION

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 54/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Factory), Puducherry and its workman Thiru P. Jothilingam over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited, Puducherry and its workman Thiru P. Atchudan over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with r u le 1 0 - B o f t he I nd u s tr i a l D i sp u t es ( Ce n t r a l ) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru P. Atchudan against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

30 June 2015] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 467

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY Enterprise situated at No. 72, Pettaiyan Chatram, Puducherry over charter of demands and refusal of employment to 12 employees while pending of the conciliation proceedings is justified ? If justified, what relief they are entitled ?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

(G.O. Rt. No. 56/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 57/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Shri Raamsuratkumar Enterprise, Puducherry and workers' representative Tmt. K. Kasiammal and 11 others over charter of demands and refusal of employment to 12 employees in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the workers' representatives namely Thiruvalargal (1) K. Kasiammal, (2) M. Saroja, (3) V. Thamizselvi, (4) M. Rani, (5) R. Sumathi, (6) S. Vijaya Lakshmi, (7) P. Lakshmi (8) D. Suganthi, (9) E. Valli, (10) I. Savitha, (11) K. Porkalai and (12) K. Chamundeswari against the management of M/s. Shri Raamsuratkumar

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Dinamalar Newspaper, Puducherry and its workman Thiru V.S. Murugan over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru V.S. Murugan against the management of M/s. Dinamalar Newspaper, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

468 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [30 June 2015

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 58/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. UCAL Fuel Systems Limited, Puducherry over non-employment of Thiru N. Govindarajulu in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether t h e d i s p u t e r a i s e d b y Thiru N. Govindarajulu against the management of M/s. UCAL Fuel Systems Limited, No. A-98, Mettupalayam Estate, Puducherry over his non- employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

BUIL DING S AND ROAD S DIVISION

Karaikal, the 15th June 2015.

e-TENDER NOTICE

On b ehal f o f the P r e sid ent o f I nd ia, e-tend er s ar e invite d fr o m the el igib le co ntr acto r s of Public Works Department Puducherry b y the Executive Engineer, Buildings and Roads Division, Public Works Department, Karaikal for the following works.

Sl. Tender Name of work Approximate Earnest Eligibility Time Cost of estimated cost money of allowed tender No. No.

(1) (2)

(3)

deposit contractors schedule (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) ` `

` 1 08-1/ Construction of reading hall over 15,89,737 31,795 Class IV 3 (Three) 500 + BRK/ the existing ground floor including 2015-16 staircase to the Branch Library at Kottucherry in Karaikal.

and months VAT @

above. 5%.