Puducherry Gazette, No. 16, 18 April 2017

Registered No. SSP/PY/44/2015-17 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410

WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2015-17

Dated : 18-4-2017

Price : ` 15-00

   La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry

➢➢ Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority   ` 15-00 Prix : ` 15-00 Price : ` 15-00 ▪  ➢ 2017 }  | 18 {

No. 16 Poudouchéry Mardi 18 Avril 2017 (28 Chaitra 1939)

No. Puducherry Tuesday 18th April 2017

➢ S OM M A I R E S C O N T E N T S

Page  Page

➢ .. 3 1 2 Sentence arbitral du travail .. 3 1 2 Award of the Labour Court .. 3 1 2

de tribunal.

• .. 3 1 4 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 3 1 4 Government Notifications .. 3 1 4  .. 327 Etablissements dangereux .. 327 Dangerous Establishments .. 327

.. 3 2 8 Announcements .. 3 2 8  .. 3 2 8 Annonces

[ 311 ]31 4 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017 against 2nd respondent and that the petitioner is willfully and wantonly stated that respondents appointed him the 2nd respondent Marg Karaikal Port on 1-2-2010 as a workman on a monthly salary Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 24th day of February, 2017.

G. THANENDRAN,

of ` 5,982 and that he was regularized on permanent basis in the year 2010, so as to harvest illegal gain from 2nd respondent and that the petitioner is illegally and unauthorizedly running a shop at the Port land outside the Port entrance gate without any legal sanction from any of the Government authority and that necessary steps are being taken by 2nd respondent and that the petitioner is gainfully employed by running a shop at the port land till date and that the petitioner in his claim statement with illegal and hidden motive has mentioned at all

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

 •

→ •▪ }| { places as "respondents" by not specifying the name of the respondent with whom he avers and alleges and that the petitioner concealed all the material and relevant facts and made false and vexatious allegations against the 2nd respondent and that the 2nd respondent had not been involved in any sort of unfair labour practice at any point of time.

5. In the course of enquiry, no oral or documentary evidence has been let in by either sides. Both sides arguments heard.

6. Records perused. This reference has been made by the Government to decide the dispute raised by the petitioner over reinstatement with backwages against the management of the respondents private limited company is justified or not and for other reliefs.

However, today the memo has been filed by the petitioner stating that there was a settlement reached between the petitioner and the respondents under section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on 6-2-2017 and the copy of the settlement arrived between the parties is also enclosed with the memo.

and that therefore, the petitioner has also stated in the memo that he is not pressing the claim. In view of the memo filed by the petitioner stating that the matter was settled between the parties herein out of Court and that not pressing the claim, the Tribunal is of the considered view that the reference is to be closed and accordingly the same is closed.

7. In the result, the reference is closed in view of the memo filed by the petitioner stating that the matter is settled out of Court and not pressing the case.



➢ ➢ •▪ •  

      ➢     ➢

 ▪            ➢  ➢        ➢ ➢  ➢

        ➢   ➢  ➢ •        

  •➢18 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 315 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND

COMMERCE (SECRETARIAT WING)

NO. 111/DSE/JBB/2017.

(G. O. Ms. No. 13/Ind.&Com./A6/2017,

Puducherry, dated 3rd April 2017)

Puducherry, the 31st March 2017.

MEMORANDUM

Thiru M. Venkataramanan, Bal Bhavan Instructor in Creative Art, Jawahar Bal Bhavan, Puducherry is absconding from duty unauthorizedly since 13-3-2012.

He has not responded to the communication sent to him by the Department on 28-3-2012, 25-6-2012, 8-8-2012, 29-8-2016 and 9-9-2016 nor has he reported for duty till date.

2. As per rule 12(2) of the CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972, a Government servant who remains absent from duty for a continuous period exceeding five years other than on foreign service, with or without leave, shall be deemed to have resigned from the Government service provided that a reasonable opportunity to explain the reasons for such absence shall be given to that Government servant before provisions of sub-rule (2) are invoked.

3. A c c o r d i n g l y, T h i r u M . Ve n k a t a r a m a n a n , Bal Bhavan Instructor in Creative Art, Jawahar Bal Bhavan, Puducherry is hereby given an opportunity to explain as to why the abovesaid rule 12 (2) of the CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972 shall not be invoked against him as he remains absent from duty for a continuous period exceeding five years without any communication from him.

4. The required explanation shall reach the undersigned with in 10 days from the date of publication/issue of this Memorandum failing which he

NOTIFICATION

Constitution of the "High Level Committee" to decide upon the special incentives/concessions to be extended to the industrial projects in the Union territory of Puducherry has been approved as hereunder.

1. Hon'ble Chief Minister . . Chairman 2. Hon'ble Minister for Industries . . Member 3. Chief Secretary to Government . . Member 4. Development Commissioner/ . . Member Secretary (Finance)

5. Secretary to Government (Industries . . Member and Commerce)

6. Director of Industries and Commerce. . Member-

Secretary.

The above Committee shall decide the quantum of special incentives/concessions to the industrial projects over and above the concessions/incentives as provided in the New Industrial Policy 2016 so as to attract new investments and to retain the existing industrial establishments as well as to encourage them to enhance their production capacity and turnover mainly taking into account the investment to be made by them and employment to be provided in this Union territory of Puducherry.

The Committee will meet as and when the necessity arises.

(By order)

G. MALAR KANNAN, Additional Secretary to Government (Industries and Commerce).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS) shall be deemed to have resigned from the Government service with immediate effect, without any further (G.O. Ms. No. 17, Puducherry, dated 4th April 2017) notice.

NOTIFICATION

L. KUMAR,

Director of School Education.

To,

Thiru M. Venkataramanan,

Bal Bhavan Instructor,

No. 19, II Cross,

Tagore Nagar, Lawspet,

Puducherry-605 008.

On attaining the age o f super annuatio n, Thiru P. Arunagiri, Assistant Engineer, B & R Circle-I, Public Works Department, Puducherry is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 30-4-2017.

(By order)

V. THENRALI, Deputy Secretary to Government (Works).

31 6 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTM ENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 05/AIL/Lab./G/2017,

Puducherry, dated 4th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the proposal for fixation of minimum rates of wages payable to the employees employed in Leather Goods Manufactory in the Union territory of Puducherry wa s p u b l i s h e d a s r e q u i r e d u n d e r c l a u s e ( b ) o f sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Central Act 11 of 1948) in the Labour D e p a r t me n t ' s n o t i f i c a t i o n i s s u e d v i d e G. O . M s . No . 3/AIL/Lab./G/2016, dated 5th July, 2016 published in the Official Gazette No. 29, d ated 1 9 th J uly, 20 1 6 , inviting objections and suggestions from all persons likely to be a f f e c t e d t h e r e b y, w i t h i n s i x t y d a y s f r o m t h e date of publication of the said notification in the Official Gazette of Puducherry;

2. And whereas, the said Gazette notification was notified for information of the general public on 19th July, 2016;

3. And whereas, pursuant to the said notification no objections or suggestions have been received within the abovesaid stipulated time limit;

4. And whereas, a meeting was convened on 29-9-2016 with the employers and employees representatives under the Chairmanship of Secretary to Government (Labour), Puducherry for the purpose of examining the minimum rates of wages to the employees employed in Leather Goods Manufactory 6. And whereas, the objection received from the management of M/s.Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry was considered and found that the Government of Puducherry adopted the second method by notification in the Official Gazette, publish its proposals for the information of persons likely to be affected thereby and specify a date, not less than two months from the date of the notification, on which the proposals will be taken into consideration;

7. And whereas, objection raised under para 5 (ii) is not tenable in as much as the minimum rates of wages in this proposal is fixed taking into consideration of the Consumer Price Index Numbers (General) for Industrial workers of Puducherry as notified by the Labour Bureau, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India.

8. And whereas, since, the Government followed the procedure as enshrined under section 5 of the Act and other relevant provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, it was decided to fix the minimum rates of wages to the employees employed in Leather Goods Manufactory in the Union territory of Puducherry;

9. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 read with sub-section (2) of section 5 and sub-section (1) of section 13 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Central Act 11 of 1948), the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is hereby pleased to fix the minimum rates of wages payable to each category of employees employed in Leather Goods Manufactory in the Union territory of Puducherry, as specified in the Schedule:-

SCHEDULE

Employment in leather goods manufactory

in the Union territory of Puducherry;

5. And whereas, the management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry has submitted their objection vide letter, dated 7-10-2016, on the following grounds:

(i) Government of Puducherry has not opted to fix Minimum Rates of Wages in the scheduled employment of Leather Goods Manufactory through Committee method under section 5 (a) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

Sl. Classes of employees Minimum No.

rates of wages per month (8 hours work per day) (1)

(2)

(3)

` I. Administrative Staff

(ii) The Minimum Rates of Wages proposed by the Government of Puducherry is higher than rates fixed by the Government of Tamil Nadu.

1 Manager 7,923.00 2 Accountant 7,496.0018 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 317 (1)

(2)

(3) GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

` 3 Superintendent/Storekeeper 7,210.00 (G.O. Rt. No. 31/AIL/Lab./T/2017, Puducherry, dated 4th April 2017) 4 Typist/Timekeeper/Computer 6,925.00 Operator/Cashier.

5 Driver/Mechanic/Electrician 6,925.00 6 Cleaner/Attender/Gardener 6,355.00

NOTIFICATION

II. Technical Staff

1 Unskilled 6,355.00 2 Semi-skilled 6,640.00 3 Skilled

6,925.00 Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Sri Bharathi Motor Service, Sholinghur, Vellore District having its branch office at Muthialpet, Puducherry and its workman Thiru V. Vivekananthan over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Explanations

(1) Dearness allowance:— In addition to the minimum rates of basic wages fixed above, the employees shall be paid dearness allowance as indicated below:-

(i) The dearness allowance is linked to the Puducherry City Consumer Price Index for the month of December, 2014 i.e., 262 points (with base year 2001=100) and for every raise of one point over and above 262 points an increase of ` 24.25 (Rupees twenty-four and paise twenty-five only) per point per month shall be paid as dearness allowance.

(ii) The dearness allowance shall be calculated every month, based on the availability of latest Consumer Price Index Points.

(2) Where the nature of work is the same, no discrimination in the payment of wages shall be made between men and women employees.

(3) To arrive at the daily wages, the monthly wages shall be divided by 26.

(4) Wherever the existing wages are higher than the minimum wages fixed herein, the same higher wages shall be continued to be paid.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor) Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner Thiru V. Vivekananthan, Nettapakkam, Puducherry against the management of M/s. Sri Bharathi Motor Service, Sholinghur, Vellore District having its branch office at Muthialpet, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified or not? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN,

Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

31 8 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017

 •

    

▪



[(iii)- ]

➢             

 ➢➢    ▪  ▪  ▪ 









H. A. Ca.

 –   

 • D     ➢↔

 ➢•

  D    A ➢➢

 ➢

 –   

 ▪

F     ➢➢

 

F     ➢

↔ ➢

 – ➢  

  G     ➢•

  ➢         ▪➢▪➢➢➢ ➢➢➢ 

➢➢    ▪   ▪       ➢

}|{,

   18 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 319 • →            

•▪

}|{



• ➢•▪       

         

       • ➢   ➢  •➢ 



  •➢

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECRETARIAT WING)

 ▪           ➢• ➢ ➢    •  

(G. O. Ms. No. 02, Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)



 

   ➢ ▪• ➢➢ • 

 ▪    ➢▪  ➢ • 

 ➢

  ➢

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Thiru R. Mahalingam, Vice-Principal, Bharathi Government Higher Secondary School, Bahour, Puducherry is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 30-4-2017.

(By order)

V. JAISANKAR, Under Secretary to Government (School Education).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTM ENT

➢• ▪➢ • 

(G.O. Rt. No. 32/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

 

  ➢ ➢ ▪➢ • 

     ➢↔ ▪  

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries, P uducherr y and T hiruvalargal M. Kanniyapp an, A. Munisamy and R. Periyasamy, Puducherry over reinstatement with backwages and other statutory benefits in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

32 0 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from t he d a te o f i s s u e o f r e f e r e n c e a s s t i p u l a t e d u n d e r sub- section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with r u le 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioners Thiruvalargal (i) M. Kanniyappan, (ii) A. Munisamy and (iii) R. Periyasamy against the management of M/s. SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries, Puducherry over reinstatement with backwages and other statutory benefits is justified? If justified, what relief they are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitiner Selvi M. Kalaivani, Karaikal against the management of M/s. The Karaikal Women Co-operative Printing Society Limited, Karaikal over refusal of employment is justified or not? If justified, what relief she is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 33/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

(G.O. Rt. No. 34/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. The Karaikal Women Co-operative Printing Society Limited, Karaikal and Selvi M. Kalaivani, Karaikal over refusal of employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. R.K. Guest House, Sellur, Karaikal and Thiru G. Ravi, Karaikal over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

18 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 321

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner Thiru G. Ravi, Karaikal against the management of M/s. R.K. Guest House, Sellur, Thirunallar, Karaikal over non-employment is justified or not? If justified, what relief the petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Hotel De L' Orient Oozhiyargal Sangam, Puducherry against the management of M/s. Hotel De L' Orient, Puducherry over non-payment of 20% bonus and ` 5,000 as ex gratia for the year 2014-2015 is justified or not? If justified, what relief the union workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

LABOUR DEPARTM ENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 35/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

(G.O. Rt. No. 36/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hotel De L' Orient, Puducherry and the union workmen represented by Hotel De L' Orient Oozhiyargal Sangam, Puducherry over non-payment of 20% bonus and ` 5,000 as ex gratia for the year 2014-2015 in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, Karaikal and Thiru G. Anandaraman and 12 others listed in the Annexure-I, over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

32 2 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

(1) (2)

7. S. Suresh, 8. J. Beemarao, 9. S. Murugavel,

10. S. Yudhi Francis, 11. P. Aravamutham, 12. P. Selvamani, 13. K. Thennarasu.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTM ENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 37/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from t he d a te o f i ss ue o f r ef er en ce a s s ti p u la t ed u nd er sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with r ule 1 0 -B o f t h e I n d u s tr ia l D is p u te s ( C en tr al ) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner Thiru G. Anandaraman and 12 others listed in the Annexure-I, against the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, Karaikal over non- employment is justified or not? If justified, what relief the petitioners are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

ANNEXURE-I

Sl. Name No.

(1) (2)

1. G. Anandaraman, 2. S. Vasudevan, 3. R. Sakthivel, 4. V.R. Ganesan, 5. P. Darmadoure, 6. S. Saminathan,

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries, Puducherry and Thiruvalargal K. Raji and V. Krishnamoorthy, Puducherry over reinstatement with backwages and other statutory benefits in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from t he d a te o f i s s u e o f r e f e r e n c e a s s t i p u l a t e d u n d e r sub- section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with r u le 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioners Thiruvalargal K. Raji and V. Krishnamoorthy, Puducherry against the management of M/s.SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries, Puducherry18 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 323 o ve r reinstatement with backwages and other statutory benefits is justified? If justified, what relief they are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union workmen represented by Indiya Thozhirsanga Maiyam (CITU), Puducherry against the management of M/s. Dr. Miltons Laboratories Private Limited, Puducherry over illegal closure and non-employment of S. Arulvizhi and 26 others as listed in Annexure-I are justified or not? If justified, what relief the employees listed in Annexure-I are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

E. VALLAVAN, Commissioner of Labour-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

(G. O. Rt. No. 38/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Dr. Miltons Laboratories Private Limited, Puducherry and the union workmen represented by Indiya Thozhirsanga Maiyam (CITU), Puducherry o v e r illegal closure and non-employment of S. Arulvizhi and 26 others as listed in the Annexure-I in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE-I

Sl. Name No.

(1) (2)

1 S. Arulvizhi 2 S. Boomadevi 3 J. Revathi 4 G. Nalini 5 H. Shanmugapriya 6 M. Katheravi 7 L. Banumathi 8 M. Rajeswari 9 A. Thamizharasi

1 0 I. Deivakanni 11 E. Shanthi 1 2 S. Lakshmi 1 3 R. Kavitha 1 4 S. Meenabai 1 5 A. Vimala 1 6 D. Valli 1 7 G. Mahalakshmi 1 8 P. Suseela @ Usha 1 9 V. Veerammal @ Pushpa 2 0 S. Muniammal @ Jamuna 2 1 I. Saraswathy 2 2 M. Kannagi 2 3 S. Lakshmi 2 4 S. Amsaveni @ Guna 2 5 M. Maidhili 2 6 P. Deivanai 2 7 K. Valli32 4 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

NO. 3818/CEO/KKL/E3(Exam)/2017/646.

Karaikal, the 5th April 2017.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary Course Examination Mark Certificate/S.S.L.C. Mark Certificates and beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, any one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations ( Sec), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl. Name of the Examination Register No. Serial No. School in which No. applicant

session and of the mark studied last

year certificate

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Thiru/Tmt./Selvi :

(6)

1 Aravindkumar, R. HSC 540014, 5125741 Thanthai Periyar Government

March 2010 Higher Secondary School,

Kovilpathu, Karaikal.

2 Sarojadevi, M. SSLC 3980240, A302388 Mur ugathalachi Go ver nment

March 1996 Girls' High School, Karaikal.

3 Priya @ Karupayee, N. SSLC 477118, 578857 Annai Theresa Government Girls' GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

March 2003 Higher Secondary School,

Karaikal.

S. ILANGOVANE, Chief Educational Officer.

————

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 42/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru L. Stalin, over reinstatement and subsistence allowance in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru L. Stalin, against the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal18 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 325 over his reinstatement and subsistence allowance is justified or not? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 44/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)

(G.O. Rt. No. 43/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru M. Dhanasegaran, over reinstatement and backwages in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute r aised by T h i r u M . D ha na s eg a r a n , ag a in s t th e ma na g emen t o f M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal over reinstatement and backwages is justified or not? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru T. Suresh, over reinstatement in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru T. Suresh, against the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal over reinstatement is justified or not? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

32 6 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [18 April 2017

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 46/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)

(G.O. Rt. No. 45/AIL/Lab./T/2017,

Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru U. Shanmuganathan, over reinstatement in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) W h et h e r t h e d i s p ut e r ai s e d b y T hi r u U.Shanmuganathan, against the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal over reinstatement is justified or not? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru G. Subash, over reinstatement, subsistence allowance and backwages in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru G. Subash, a ga in st th e ma na ge me nt o f M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal over his reinstatement, subsistence allowance and backwages is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

18 April 2017] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 327

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

(By order)

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G. O. Ms. No. 17, Puducherry, dated 10th April 2017)

E. VALLAVAN, Labour Commissioner-cum- Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).

———— GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, the HOME DEPARTMENT

following Pondicherry Civil Service (Selection Grade) Officers shall retire from service on the afternoon of (G.O. Ms. No. 16, Puducherry, dated 7th April 2017)

ORDER

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for redesignation of the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police/Stenographer (Male) as Head Constable/ Stenographer (Male) in India Reserve Battalion, Puducherry, with immediate effect, as detailed below:

Sl. Old Redesignated Pay No. Designation as Matrix (Level) (1) (2)

(3) (4) 1. Assistant Sub-Inspector Head Constable/ Level-4 of Police/Stenographer Stenographer (Male). (Male).

(By order)

30-4-2017.

Sl. Name and Designation

No.

(1)

(2)

1 Thiru S. Abel Rozario,

Deputy Collector (Excise),

Puducherry.

2 Thiru S. Kanakaraj,

Private Secretary to Public Works Minister, Puducherry.

(By order)

M. KANN AN,

B. PRABAGARAN, Deputy Secretary to Government.

Under Secretary to Government.

 

 



▪➢➢ 

      ▪ ➢    ▪  

 ➢

    B.  M/s. →     ➢  ▪➢ ▪G▪  ➢ ▪  ▪,  ▪➢

➢