Registered No. PY/44/2018-20 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410
WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2018-20
Dated : 9-10-2018
Price : ` 27-00
La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry
➢➢ Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ` 27-00 Prix : ` 27-00 Price : ` 27-00 ▪ ➢ 2018 } | 9 {
No. 41 Poudouchéry Mardi 9 Octobre 2018 (17 Asvina 1940)
No. Puducherry Tuesday 9th October 2018
➢ SOMMAIRES C ON TE NTS
Page Page
➢ .. 1298 Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 1298 Award of the Labour Court .. 1298
de Tribunal.
• .. 1307 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 1307 Government Notifications .. 1307 .. 1316 Avis d'Adjudications .. 1316 Tender Notices .. 1316 .. 1322 Etablissements Dangereux .. 1322 Dangerous Establishments .. 1322 .. 1326 Annonces .. 1326 Announcements .. 1326 .. 13 34 Corrigendum .. 13 34 Corrigendum .. 13 34
[ 1297 ]9 October 2018] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 1307 Ex.R6 — Copy of Acknowledgment Card for service of charge memo, dated 27-02-2013 to the petitioner.
Ex.R7 — 27-02-2013 Copy of the charge memo issued by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R8 — 30-03-2013 Copy of the warning memo given by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R9 — 13-03-2013 Copy of the discharge summary given by the respondent Hospital to the petitioner.
Ex.R10—27-04-2013 Copy of the charge memo issued by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R11—29-04-2013 Copy of the explanation letter given by the petitioner to the respondent for the charge memo, dated 27-04-2013.
Ex.R12—15-05-2013 Copy of the order passed by the respondent for the charge memo, dated 27-04-2013.
Ex.R13—21-09-2013 Copy of the charge memo issued by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R20—02-01-2014 Copy of the enquiry proceedings given by the Enquiry Officer.
Ex.R21—03-01-2014 Copy of the second show cause notice given by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R22 03-01-2014 Copy of the findings of the enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer.
Ex.R23 03-01-2014 Copy of the explanation letter given by the petitioner to the respondent.
Ex.R24 04-06-2014 Copy of the explanation letter given by the petitioner to the respondent.
Ex.R25 — Copy of the service rules of the respondent's institution.
Ex.R26 28-01-2014 Copy of the dismissal order passed by respondent to the petitioner with RPAD slip and Acknowledgement Card.
G. THANENDRAN, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
Ex.R14—23-09-2013 Copy of the explanation letter given by the petitioner to the respondent to the charge memo, dated 21-09-2013.
(G.O. Rt. No. 124/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)
Ex.R15—01-10-2013 Copy of the order passed by the respondent for the charge memo, dated 21-09-2013.
Ex.R16—17-12-2013 Copy of the charge memo issued by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R17—23-12-2013 Copy of the explanation letter given by the petitioner to the respondent.
Ex.R18—27-12-2013 Copy of the enquiry notice sent by the respondent to the petitioner.
Ex.R19 — Copy of Acknowledgment Card for service of charge memo, dated 27-12-2013 to the petitioner.
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry and the union workmen represented by United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, over providing safety in supply of food to the workers in the working place/canteen in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of1308 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [9 October 2018 section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union workmen represented by United Labour Fedaration, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai against the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry, over providing safety in supply of food to the workers in the working place/canteen are justified or not? If justified, what relief the union workmen are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed ?
(By order)
S. MOUTTOULINGAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether there exists any employer-employee relationship between the management of M/s. ICICI Bank Limited, Needarajayapar Street, Puducherry and M/s. IRIS Facility Management Global Services LLP, Hyderabad, Telangana and Tmt. S. Hema, Veerampattinam, Puducherry? If so, to give appropriate directions?
(b) Whether the dispute raised by Tmt., S. Hema, Veerampattinam, Puducherry against the management of M/s. ICICI Bank Limited, Needarajapar Street, Puducherry and M/s. IRIS facility Management Global S e r v i c e s L L P, H y d er a b a d , Te l a n g a n a , o v e r non-employment is justified or not? If justified, what relief she is entitled to?
(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed ?
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(By order)
(G.O. Rt. No. 125/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)
NOTIFICATION
S. MOUTTOULINGAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 126/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. ICICI Bank Limited, Needarajayapar Street, Puducherry and M/s. IRIS Facility Management Global Services LLP, Hyderabad, Telangana and Tmt. S. Hema, Veerampattinam, Puducherry, over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry and the union workmen represented by9 October 2018] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 1309 United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, over confirmation of the employees listed in Annexure-I and to fix the working hours in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
8. N. Siddharthan
9. M. Prathaap
10. R. Pratheep Raj
11 P. Rajagopal
12. R. Rajesh
13. P. Harikrishnan
14. J. Jayaseelan
15. A. Manikandan
16. K. Aravindh
17. V. Senthil Kumar
18. S. Michael Raj
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 127/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union workmen, represented by United Labour Fedaration, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai against the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry, over confirmation of the employees listed in Annexture-I and to fix the working hours are justified or not? If justified, what relief they are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed ?
(By order)
S. MOUTTOULINGAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
ANNEXURE-I
1. P. Vinoth Kumar
2. V. Arun Rozariyo Amiral
3. M. Sathish Kumar
4. I. Vimalraj
5. S. Rajavarma
6. M. Suresh Kumar
7. S. Sanjeevi
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited and Shasun Chemical Staff Union, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry, over grant of financial reward of ` 1,00,000 each to the retired employees as listed in Annexure-I on account of transfer of undertaking of the management of M/s. Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited to M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
1310 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [9 October 2018ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Shasun Chemical Staff Union, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry against the management of M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited, Puducherry, over grant of financial reward of `1,00,000 each to the retired employees as listed in Annexure-I on account of transfer of undertaking of the management of M/s. Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited to M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited is justified or not?
If justified, what relief they are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed ?
ANNEXURE-I
1. R. Krishnamoorthy
2. V. Achuthan
3. M. Mohan
4. P. Veeraraghavan
5. G. Veerapathiran
6. D. Devadoss
7. A. Muthusamy
8. P. Ramachandiran
9. A. Mohammed Symella
10. N. Poomalai
11. A. Udhuman Ali
12. V. Pandian
13. Y. Johns Arthur
(By order)
over promotion of Thiru P. Chandramohan as Junior Operator with effect from 23-11-2009 and to grant him subsequent promotion to the post of Senior Operator with all monetary and service benefits in respect of the matter mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Indiya Thozhirsanga Maiyam (CITU), Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, against the management of M/s. Puducherry Distilleries Limit ed , P ud ucher ry, o ver p ro mo tio n o f T hir u
S. MOUTTOULINGAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY P. Chandramohan as Junior Operator with effect from 23-11-2009 and to grant him subsequent promotion to the post of Senior Operator with all monetary and service benefits is justified or not?
LABOUR DEPARTM ENT
(b) If justified, what relief Thiru P. Chandramohan is entitled to?
(G.O. Rt. No. 129/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 30th August 2018)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between Puducherry Distilleries Limited, Puducherry and Indiya (c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
S. MOUTTOULINGAM,
Thozhirsanga Maiyam (CITU), Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
9 October 2018] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 1311GOVERNMENT OF P UDUCHERRY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTM ENT
LABOUR DEPARTM ENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 130/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 5th September 2018)
(G.O. Rt. No. 131/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 5th September 2018)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between Puducherry Distilleries Limited, Puducherry and Puducherry Distilleries Limited Workers Union, over grant of promotion to Thiru V. Kannan for the post of Electrician Grade-III, with retrospective effect with all monetary and service benefits, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from t he d a te o f i ss ue o f r ef er en ce a s s ti p u la t ed u nd er sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with r ule 1 0 -B o f t h e I n d u s tr ia l D is p u te s ( C en tr al ) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Puducherry Distilleries Limited Workers Union, Ariyapalayam, Villianur, Puducherry, against the management of M/s. Puducherry Distilleries Limited, Villianur, Puducherry, over grant of promotion to Thiru V. Kannan for the post of Electrician Grade-III with retrospective effect with all monetary and service benefits is justified or not? If justified, what relief Thiru V. Kannan is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
S. MOUTTOULINGAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry and the union workmen represented by the United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, over (i) impugned transfer of 5 employees as listed in Annexure-I; (ii) impugned suspension of Thiru P. Kalaiselvan; (iii) non-employment of 17 employees as listed in Annexure-II; (iv) to grant Grade and fix the wages based on seniority to the union workmen as listed in Annexure-III and (v) impugned labour practice in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from t he d a te o f i ss ue o f r ef er en ce a s s ti p u la t ed u nd er sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with r ule 1 0 -B o f t h e I n d u s tr ia l D is p u te s ( C en tr al ) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union workmen represented by United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, against the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry, over (i) impugned transfer of 5 employees as listed in Annexure-I; (ii) impugned suspension of Thiru P. Kalaiselvan; (iii) non-employment1312 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [9 October 2018
7. R. Pradeep Raj
8. S. Rajvarma
9. V. Senthil Kumar
10. J. Jayaseelan
of 17 employees as listed in Annexure-II and (iv) to grant Grade and fix the wages based on seniority to the union workmen as listed in Annexure-III all justified or not? If justified, what relief the said workmen are entitled to?
11. P. Harikrishnan
12. S. Sanjeevi
13. A. Manikandan
14. I. Vimalraj
15. M. Suresh Kumar
(b) Whether the dispute raised by the union workmen represented by United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, against the management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour, Puducherry, over impugned labour practice is justified or not? If justified, what relief the union workmen are entitled to?
16. K. Aravind
17. M. Arun Rozariyo Amiral
(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
ANNEXURE-III
1. R. Malayan
2. P. Kalaiselvan
S. MOUTTOULINGAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
3. K. Sakthivel
4. M. Anandha Kumar
ANNEXURE-I
5. S. Veerachandran
6. A. Baskaran
Sl. Name of the Date of Place of No. employee and transfer transfer place of work
7. S. Dharmaraj
(1) (2) (3) (4) 1 R. Malayan 28-01-2017 Pallikaranai (LM 1051), Branch. Puducherry.
8. P. Murali
9. V. Vijay
10. S. Murugan
11. M. Prakash
12. T. Sisubalan
13. A. Sathish Kumar
2 J. Amaresan 28-01-2017 Koyembedu (LM 1250), Branch. Puducherry.
3 V. Vijay 14-02-2017 Thiruvannamalai (LM 2588), Branch. Puducherry.
14. J. Amareson
15. P. Kunnan
16. S. Sakthivel
17. A. Tamilvanan
18. S. Tamilselvan
19. M. Silambarasan
4 P. Kunnan 14-02-2017 Neelankarai (LM 1177), Branch. Puducherry.
20. P. Vinoth Kumar
5 A. Baskaran 14-02-2017 Chettipedu (LM 2396), Branch. Puducherry.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT
ANNEXURE-II
1. P. Rajagopal
(G.O. Rt. No. 132/AIL/Lab./T/2018,
Puducherry, dated 5th September 2018)
2. M. Sathish Kumar
3. M. Pradeep
4. S. Michael Raj
5. N. Siddharthan
6. R. Rajesh
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Ajantha Cycle Parts Industry, Industrial Estate, Thattanchavady, Puducherry and the union workmen9 October 2018] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 1313 represented by Cycle Parts Jananayaga Thozhilalar Sangam, Bharathi Street, Puducherry, over granting annnual increment to Thiru K. Sekar from the year 2006 onwards, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the I nd ustr ial Disp utes Act, 1 9 4 7 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union workmen represented by Cycle Parts Jananayaga Thozhilalar Sangam, Bharathi street, Puducherry against the management of M/s. Ajantha Cycle Parts Industry, Industrial Estate, Thattanchavady, Puducherry, over granting annual increment to Thiru K. Sekar from the year 2006 onwards is justified or not?
(b) If justified, what relief Thiru K. Sekar is entitled to?
(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed ?
(By order)
S. MOUTTOULINGAM, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
NO. 680-683/DSE/HSW/EC/C/2018.
Puducherry, dated the 25th August 2018.
NOTIFICATION
I t is her eb y info r med that the fo llo wing cand id ate s have lo st their o r iginal Higher Secondary Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, any one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.
Sl. Name and address of the Register No., Sl. No. of the School in which No. applicant session and mark studied last
year certificate
(1) (2)
(3) (4)
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
(5)
1 Rajesh S 572712, March 2015 — Anbalaya Higher Secondary School, Shanthi Nagar, Puducherry.
2 Saijanani R 544106, March 2013 7979393 Vivekananda Higher Secondary School, Sellaperumalpet, Puducherry.
3 Diderot Emil D 559734, March 2014 9106409 Anbalaya Higher Secondary Schoo l, Shanthi Nagar, Puducherry.
4 Jayasri G 559889, March 2014 9093175 Sri N.K.C. Government (Girls) Higher Secondary School, Kurusukuppam, Puducherry.
M. KUPP USAM Y, Joint Director.
1314 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [9 October 2018GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY ➢
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)
(G. O. Ms. No. 31, Puducherry, dated 6th September 2018)
NOTIFICATION
O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Thiru M. Vaitianadin, Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Puducherry [on deputation to Project Implementation Agency (PIA), Puducherry], is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 30-9-2018.
(By order)
CHAURE RATNAGHOSH KISHOR, Under Secretary to Government (Works).
————
• → (i) ➢ • • ➢
(ii) ➢ ➢ •
(iii) ➢ ➢
(iv) ➢ ➢➢
•▪
}➢|{
• ➢ • ▪ [ ▪ ➢ ] ▪ (v) ➢ ➢
▪ ➢ ▪ ▪ ➢ ➢
➢➢ ➢ ▪
• ➢
————
• → •▪ }➢|{ ▪ ➢ ➢ ➢↔↔ ➢ • ➢ ➢
• S.K. ➢ ➢ ▪A-22012/1/2012/DPAR/SSI(2)
➢↔↔ ➢ ➢➢• 9 October 2018] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 1315 ➢
•➢
➢
•▪ @ •
S.K. ➢ • ➢▪ ➢ • ➢ ➢
▪ ➢ • A. ↔ ➢ ➢
A. ↔ ➢ ➢➢ •
• ➢
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
NO. 801/JD-IEC/2018.
Puducherry, the 20th September 2018.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby notified that the following candidates have lost their original S.S.L.C. Mark Certificates and beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, any one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.
Sl. Name of the Register No., Sl. No. of School in which No. applicant session and the mark studied last
year certificate
(1) (2)
(3) Thiruvalargal:
(4)
(5)
1 D. Ganesan 508524, March 2007 — Government Higher Secondary School,
551092, July 2007 Sedarapet and Private study.
2 S. Sarath Kumar 2163959, April 2012 — Private study.
M. KUPPUSAMY, Joint Director of School Education.
1316 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [9 October 2018GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY G O V E R N M E N T O F P U D U C H E R RY OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF OFFICE OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS SCHOOL EDUCATION
Puducherry, the 18th September 2018.
No. 802/JD-IEC/2018,
T E ND E R -CUM-AUCTION N O T I C E Puducherry, the 25th September 2018.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet bearing Register Number 1749634, of April 2012 in respect of Jayasri G, an ex-pupil of Sacret Heart of Public are hereby informed that the unserviceable articles of this office as listed in the Annexure will be disposed off in as-is-where-is condition by tender-cum- auction sale on 25-10-2018 at 11.30 a.m.
Terms and Conditions
Jesus High School, Puducherry, is reported to have been lost beyond the scope of recovery and is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate. If, the original certificate is to be found by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of Government Examinations, Chennai-600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.
1. The sealed tenders should be addressed to the "Senior Accounts Officer, Office of the Council of Ministers, Puducherry" duly superscribing on the envelope as "Tender for purchase of unserviceable/ unserviceable Electronic items" and should reach this office on or before 25-10-2018 at 10.30 a.m. The tenders will be opened at 11.00 a.m. on the same day
M. KUPP USAM Y,
Joint Director of School Education.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY in the presence of the tenderers present if any, in the chamber of the undersigned at Office of the Council of Ministers, Puducherry.
2. The tender will be awarded to the highest tenderer on the spot.
LABOUR DEPARTM ENT
3. If, the highest tender amount offered by the (G.O. Rt. No. 137/AIL/Lab./T/2018, tenderer is found to be not acceptable by the Puducherry, dated 28th September 2018) NOTIFICATION
On the recommendations of the High Court of Judicature at Madras and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to appoint Thiru C. Kumarsaravanan, District Judge, functioning as Judge, Family Court, Puducherry, as the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Puducherry for the whole of the Union territory of Puducherry for the purposes of the said Act.
2. The notification shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from 28th day of June, 2018 forenoon.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor) undersigned, then the public auction will be conducted on the spot keeping the highest tender amount as the minimum upset price for bid of auction.
4. The intending tenderers should deposit an earnest money of ` 1,000 (Rupees one thousand only) along with sealed tenders. The earnest money deposit of the unsuccessful tenderers will be refunded on the same day soon after completion of the tender/auction sale.
5. The successful tenderer/bidder should pay the entire amount soon after the completion of the tender/ auction sale and should clear the sold materials at his own arrangements/cost before 5.00 p.m. on the same day, failing which the office will not be held responsible either for the safe custody or for loss or damage of articles once the tender/auction sale is over.
6. GST will be charged extra as per the sale applicable at the time of tender/auction sale.
S. MOUTTOULINGAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
7. No claim on the quantity or quality of the articles will be admitted once the tender/auction sale is over.