Registered No. PY/44/2021-23 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry
PART - I
E≈©A ÿkπX| EXTRAORDINAIRE EXTRAORDINARY
Published by ∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ Publiée par ÿkπX| Autorité Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿk^π¬˛wÁ\ 2022 } ∏©´kˆ | 18 {
No. 28 Poudouchéry Vendredi 18 Février 2022 (29 Magha 1943)
No. Puducherry Friday 18th February 2022
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 388/2021 of I.R. No. 80/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./241
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), S/o. Mohan,
No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. . Counter Petitioner
[ 113]LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 114 114 This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), S/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 80/2021, under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 18-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities and thereby causes disturbance to the public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality, being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Sl. Crime No. and Section Name of the State of the No.
Police Station case (1)
(2)
(3) (4) 1 253/08, under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 06-11-2008. Muthialpet Conviction 2 02/09, under sections 324, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-01-2009. Muthialpet Acquittal 3 185/09, under sections 294, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 27-03-2009. Grand Bazaar Acquittal 4 297/09, under section 34 E(i) of PP Act, dated 06-09-2009. Muthialpet Conviction 5 238/10, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-11-2010. Muthialpet Acquittal 6 189/11, under sections 147, 148, 302, r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011. Muthailpet Acquittal 7 282/11, under sections 34 EI and 34 B IX of PP Act, dated 06-11-2011. Muthialpet conviction 8 311/11, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 07-12-2011. Muthialpet Acquitted 9 33/12, under sections 147, 427, 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-02-2012. Muthialpet Acquittal 10 85/12, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 27-04-2013. Muthialpet Acquitted 11 I.R. No. 50/12, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 06-06-2012. Muthialpet Closed 12 I.R. No. 65/12, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 15-08-2012. Muthialpet Closed 13 199/12, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act. Muthialpet Acquitted 14 221/12, under section 34 B IX and 34 E1 of PP Act, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC. Muthialpet Acquitted 15 41/13, under section 25 (1-A) of Arms Act, dated 18-03-2013. Mudaliarpet Acquittal 16 125/13, under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 30-08-2013. Muthialpet Acquitted 17 22/14, under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 21-02-2014. Muthialpet Acquittal 18 I.R. No. 86/2014, under section 144 Cr.P.C., dated 18-06-2014. Muthialpet Closed 19 I.R. No. 31/2016, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 05-06-2016. Muthialpet Closed 20 I.R. No. 129/2016, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 09-11-2016. Muthialpet Closed 21 I.R. No. 06/2018, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 21-02-2018. Muthialpet ClosedPART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 115 (1)
(2)
(3) (4) 22 I.R. No. 17/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 11-03-2019. Muthialpet Closed 23 I.R. No. 59/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 07-10-2019. Muthialpet Closed 24 Cr. No. 95/2020, under sections 120(B), 147, 148, 341, 302, 109 IPC r/w Muthialpet Pending Trial 149 IPC, dated 07-09-2020.
4. It is also stated in the additional information filed by the Station House Officer, dated 23-12-2021 that the Counter Petitioner and his brother were roaming in the locality along with his associates and disturbing the business people and extorting money from them by threatening. Also, it is reported that the Counter Petitioner threatened the witnesses of one Ganesan murder case. It is further stated that the Counter Petitioner was recently released from the Central Prison, Kalapet in connection with detention under Goondas Act and his presence is likely to affect normalcy and public peace of the locality.
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding person and therefore, his criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security proceedings under the Cr.P.C. 6. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing on 21-12-2021 and further hearings on 23-12-2021 and 30-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Pazhaniyammal. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 30-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru. G. Kalaiarasan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan was present and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
9. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the Petitioner. In the Police information report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in various crimes such as assault, murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 24 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counsel for the Counter Petitioner. The learned Counsel for Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
10. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 116 11610. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 30th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 389/2021 of I.R. No. 81/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./240
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Vengadesan (33), S/o. Mohan, No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. . Counter Petitioner This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Vengadesan (33), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 81/2021, under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 18-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities and thereby causes disturbance to the public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality, being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
PART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 117Sl. Crime No. and Section Name of the State of the No.
Police Station case (1)
(2)
(3) (4) 1 Cr. No. 113/2007, under sections 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 06-05-2007 Muthialpet Acquitted 2 Cr. No. 177/2007, under sections 448, 427, 323, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, Muthialpet Acquitted dated 12-07-2007.
3 Cr. No. 189/2007, under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 27-07-2007 Muthialpet Convicted 4 Cr. No. 48/08, under sections 341, 324, 307 IPC and 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC @ 341, Muthialpet Acquitted 326, 307, 201 IPC and 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 24-03-2008.
5 Cr. No. 185/09, under sections 294, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 27-03-2009 Grand Bazaar Acquitted 6 Cr. No. 02/2009, under sections 324, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-01-2009 Muthialpet Acquitted 7 Cr. No. 351/2009, under section 27 Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, Muthialpet Acquitted dated 08-11-2009
8 Cr. No. 33/2010, under section 27 Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, Muthialpet Acquitted dated 12-02-2010.
9 Cr. No. 156/2010, under section 302 IPC @ 147, 148, 302 IPC and 3 of Muthialpet Pending Trial Explosive Substances Act r/w 149 IPC, dated 09-07-2010.
10 Cr. No. 238/2010, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-11-2010 Muthialpet Pending Trial 11 Cr. No. 113/2011, under section 188 IPC, dated 04-05-2011 Muthialpet Acquitted 12 Cr. No. 189/11, under sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011 Muthialpet Pending Trial 13 Cr. No. 104/2012, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B IX of PP Act, Muthialpet Acquitted dated 01-06-12.
14 I.R. No. 62/12, under section 151 Cr.P.C. @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 08-08-2012 Muthialpet Closed 15 Cr. No. 222/12, under section 34 B IX and 34 E1 of PP Act, 506(ii) IPC Muthialpet Acquitted r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-12-2012.
16 I.R. No. 18/13, under section 151 Cr.P.C. @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 12-08-2013 Muthialpet Closed 17 I.R. No. 47/13, under section 144 Cr.P.C., dated 07-11-2013 Muthialpet Closed 18 Cr. No. 02/14, under section 188 IPC and 27(1) of Arms Act 1959, dated 05-01-2014 Muthialpet Acquitted 19 I.R. No. 30/2016, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 04-06-2016 Muthialpet Closed 20 I.R. No. 08/2018, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 26-02-2018 Muthialpet Closed 21 I.R. No. 23/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 13-03-2019 Muthialpet Closed 22 I.R. No. 60/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 07-10-2019 Muthialpet Closed 23 Cr. No. 95/2020, under section 120(B), 147, 148, 341, 302, 109 IPC r/w 149 IPC, Muthialpet Pending Trial dated 07-09-2020.
4. It is also stated in the additional information filed by the Station House Officer, dated 23-12-2021, that the Counter Petitioner and his brother were roaming in the locality along with his associates and disturbing the business people and extorting money from them by threatening. Also, it is reported that the Counter Petitioner threatened the witnesses of one Ganesan murder case. It is further stated that the Counter Petitioner was recently released from the Central Prison, Kalapet in connection with detention under Goondas Act and his presence is likely to affect normalcy and public peace of the locality.
LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 118 1185. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding person and therefore, his criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security proceedings under the Cr.P.C. 6. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing on 21-12-2021 and further hearings on 23-12-2021 and 30-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Pazhaniyammal. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 30-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru G. Kalaiarasan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan was present and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
9. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the Petitioner. In the Police information report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He has involved in various crimes such as assault, murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 23 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counsel for the Counter Petitioner. The learned Counsel for Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
10. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Vengadesan (33), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 30th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
PART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 119IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 390/2021, I.R.No. 102/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./239
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Ponnusamy @ Nagaraj (24), S/o. Ezhumalai, No. 65, 4th Cross, Annai Indira Ninaivu Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry.
. . Counter Petitioner This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Ponnusamy @ Nagaraj (24), son of Ezhumalai, a resident of No. 65, 4th Cross, Annai Indira Ninaivu Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R. No. 102/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 29-10-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion. As a result the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence against him in the cases where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Section Name of the Sl. Crime No. No.
Police Station (1) (2)
(3)
(4) 1 Cr. No. 145/2014 452, 427, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-06-2014 Orleanpet 2 Cr. No. 88/2015 324, 323, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-04-2015 Orleanpet 3 I.R. No. 59/2015 Under section 107 Cr.P.C
Orleanpet 4 Cr. No. 246/2015 Under sections 294 (b), 324, 323, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 22-10-2015 Orleanpet 5 Cr. No. 01/2019 Under section 34 B IX of PP Act, dated 02-01-2019 Orleanpet 6 Cr. No. 88/2019 Under section 307 IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 03-07-2019 Orleanpet 7 Cr. No. 127/2021 Under section 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 30-08-2021 OrleanpetLA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 120 120 4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray, criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 7 criminal case was registered against him. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counter Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Ponnusamy @ Nagaraj (24), son of Ezhumalai, a resident of No. 65, 4th Cross, Annai Indira Ninaivu Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
PART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 121IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 391/2021, I.R.No. 108/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./237
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Stephanraj (21), S/o. Sagayaraj, No. 10, 1st Cross, Karunagarapillai Street, Kosapalayam, Puducherry.
. . Counter Petitioner This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Stephanraj (21), son of Sagayaraj, a resident of No. 10, 1st Cross, Karunagarapillai Street, Kosapalayam, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R. No. 108/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 02-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as attempt to murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence against him in the case where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal case was registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 124/2019, under sections 148, 120 (b), 302 IPC r/w 149 IPC of Reddiyarpalayam Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray, criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions underLA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 122 122 section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There is one criminal case was registered against him in Reddiyarpalayam Police Station. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counter Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Stephanraj (21), son of Sagayaraj, a resident of No. 10, 1st Cross, Karunagarapillai Street, Kosapalayam, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY, Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 392/2021, I.R.No. 109/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./236
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
VsPART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 123 Thiru Bharathi @ Bharathikumar (19), S/o. Mischeal, No. 08, 8th Cross, Murugan Koil Backside, Periyar Nagar, Puducherry.
. . Counter Petitioner This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Bharathi @ Bharathikumar (19), son of Mischeal, a resident of No. 08, 8th Cross, Murugan Koil Backside, Periyar Nagar, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R. No. 109/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 05-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as attempt to murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence against him in the cases where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 150/2020, under sections 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr.No. 167/2021, under section 3 (2) (a) of PD PP Act of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
3. Cr.No. 185/2021, under section 34 D of PP Act of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Under Investigation.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray, criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Rajaveni. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 124 1247. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The Counter Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
8. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available records placed before me. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 3 criminal case were registered against him in Orleanpet Police Station
9. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the recommendation of the Superintendent of Police (East), I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Bharathi @ Bharathikumar (19), son of Mischeal, a resident of No. 08, 8th Cross, Murugan Koil Backside, Periyar Nagar, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY, Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 393/2021, I.R.No. 110/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./238
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Manikandan (23), S/o. Umapathy, No. 33, 3rd Cross, Periyar Nagar, Nellithope, Puducherry.
. . Counter PetitionerPART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 125 This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Manikandan (23), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 33, 3rd Cross, Periyar Nagar, Nellithope, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R. No. 110/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 06-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as attempt to murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence against him in the cases where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 254/2020, under section 307 IPC r/w 34 IPC of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr.No. 167/2021, under section 3 (2) (a) of PD PP Act of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Under Investigation.
3. Cr.No. 184/2021, under sections 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Under Investigation.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray, criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 126 1268. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 3 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counter Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Manikandan (23), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 33, 3rd Cross, Periyar Nagar, Nellithope, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 01/2022, I.R.No. 02/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./234
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20), S/o. Vengadesan @ Iyyappan, No. 06, 3rd Cross, Ambedkar Nagar, Attupatti, Puducherry.
. . Counter PetitionerPART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 127 This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20) to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20), son of Vengadesan @ Iyyappan, a resident of No. 06, 3rd Cross, Ambedkar Nagar, Attupatti, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R. No. 02/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 09-01-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as hurt, body harm cases and disturbance to the public tranquility and order. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr. No. 124/2019, under sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 10-09-2019 of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr. No. 202/2020, under sections 341, 302 IPC r/w 34 IPC @ 147, 148, 341, 302 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 04-10-2020 of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
3. Cr.No. 41/2021, under sections 294(b), 506(ii), 116 IPC 27(1) of Arms Act r/w 34 IPC, dated 21-04-2021 – Under Investigation.
4. Cr.No. 153/2021, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC and 3 of Explosive Substances Act, r/w 149 IPC, dated 04-07-2021 of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Under Investigation.
5. I.R. No. 46/2021, under section 107 Cr.P.C.
4. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is a dangerous person habitually involved in body offences by using deadly weapons for committing the crime and he is a notorious gangster and has a number of associates in and around of Puducherry region. The Counter Petitioner is having close contact with local rowdies and intentionally engaged persons by hiring them by providing liquors and insisting them to create problems with their opposite groups. But, the activities of the Counter Petitioner would provoke enmity between the groups as earlier.
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner along with his friends under drunken mood and designed to commit some cognizable offence at Attupatti.
On seeing the Police, the Counter Petitioner along with his colleagues was found escaped from the spot. On enquiry it revealed that the Counter Petitioner along with his friends were frequently visiting there under the influence of alcohol and threatening the general public. Also revealed that the Counter Petitioner is young and energetic and shows his muscle power by picking up quarrels with others for petty reasons. It is further stated in the I.R. that he is very active and may commit any cognizable offence in connection with the prevailing law and order situation in that area. He is bad character and he may disturb the public peace and tranquility, which may cause damages to the public and private properties in the Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits.
6. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like hurt, criminal intimidation, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 128 1287. The proceedings was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 10-01-2022 to appear for the hearing on 11-01-2022. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. V. Geetha. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 11-01-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Murugesan, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
9. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available records placed before me. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20) is in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as murder, explosive substances case, assault and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 5 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations.
10. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the recommendation of the Superintendent of Police (East), I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
11. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20), son of Vengadesan @ Iyyappan, a resident of No. 06, 3rd Cross, Ambedkar Nagar, Attupatti, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 11th day of January, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY, Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 02/2022, I.R.No. 03/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./235
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
VsPART-I ] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 129 Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29),
S/o. Umapathy,
No. 87, Angunayakkar Thoppu,
Roadiarpet, Puducherry.
. . Counter Petitioner This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29) to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 87, Angunayakkar Thoppu, Roadiarpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R. No. 03/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 09-01-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as hurt, body harm cases and disturbance to the public tranquility and order. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr. No. 134/2016 , under sections 143, 341, 186 r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-06-2016 of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr. No. 159/2016 , under sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 29-06-2016 of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Conviction.
3. Cr.No. 107/2019 , under sections 147, 148, 302 IPC and 3 of Explosive Substances Act r/w 149 IPC, dated 03-09-2019 of Mudaliarpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
4. I.R. No. 02/2021 , under sections 151 @ 107 Cr.P.C., dated 05-01-2021.
4. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is a dangerous person habitually involved in body offences by using deadly weapons for committing the crime and he is a notorious gangster and has a number of associates in and around of Puducherry region. The Counter Petitioner is having close contact with local rowdies and intentionally engaged persons by hiring them by providing liquors and insisting them to create problems with their opposite groups. But, the activities of the Counter Petitioner would provoke enmity between the groups as earlier.
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter Petitioner along with his friends under drunken mood and designed to commit some cognizable offence at Roadiarpet.
On seeing the Police, the Counter Petitioner along with his colleagues was found escaped from the spot. On enquiry it revealed that the Counter Petitioner along with his friends were frequently visiting there under the influence of alcohol and threatening the general public. Also revealed that the Counter Petitioner is young and energetic and shows his muscle power by picking up quarrels with others for petty reasons. It is further stated in the I.R. that he is very active and may commit any cognizable offence in connection with the prevailing law and order situation in that area. He is bad character and he may disturb the public peace and tranquility, which may cause damages to the public and private properties in the Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits.
6. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like hurt, criminal intimidation, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer,LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [ PART-I 130 130 Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 10-01-2022 to appear for the hearing on 11-01-2022. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 11-01-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Murugesan, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
9. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available records placed before me. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29) is in such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as murder, explosive substances case, assault and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 4 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations.
10. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the recommendation of the Superintendent of Police (East), I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
11. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 87, Angunayakkar Thoppu, Roadiarpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 11th day of January, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
online publication at "https://styandptg.py.gov.in" Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.