Puducherry Gazette, No. 21, 24 May 2022

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ ÿkπX| Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\ 2022 } º\ | 24 {

No. 21 Poudouchéry Mardi 24 Mai 2022 (3 Jyaistha 1944)

No. Puducherry Tuesday 24th May 2022

ÿ✓VÚ·¶¬ÔD SOMMAIRES CONTENTS

Page ✓¬ÔD Page

∂டு∑ ∂ுsறுை''^ .. 376 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 376 Government Notifications .. 376 ரீ✓ழ்>க்ஷில் கீஞூளீல்∫'^ .. 388 Etablissements dangereux .. 388 Dangerous Establishments .. 388

.. 389 Announcements .. 389 ங்க்ஷிu≈ுறுை''^ .. 389 Annonces

[375]376 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [24 May 2022

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE SUB-COLLECTOR (REVENUE) SOUTH, VILLIANUR

No. 2978/SCRS/LR/C1/2008-09/1393.

Puducherry, the 28th April 2022.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER (LAND REFORMS)

Present : Rishita Gupta, I.A.S.,

Sub-Collector (Revenue) South-cum-Authorised Officer (Land Reforms).

Read : 1. Publication of Notification under section 17(1) in the Extraordinary Gazette No. 9, dated 12-01-1976.

2. L.T.C.M.A Order, dated 10-03-1976 in the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Pondicherry.

3. Proclamation Order, dated 22-09-2009 of the Authorised Officer (Land Reforms).

4. Order, dated 26-08-2021 in W.P.No. 8020 of 2021 in the High Court of Judicature at Madras.

5. Legal Opinion, dated 17-12-2021 of the Additional Government Pleader for Puducherry, High Court, Chennai.

6. Letter, dated 19-01-2022 of the Government Pleader for Puducherry, High Court, Chennai.

7. Opinion of the Law Department, Puducherry vide I.D.Note, dated 10-02-2022.

ORDER

Whereas, Land Reforms proceedings had been initiated to acquire surplus holdings of Tmt. Pauline Xavery, w/o. Raymond Xavery of Thirukanchi Revenue Village under the Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973.

2. The brief history of the course of Land Reforms proceedings is detailed below:

On Scrutiny of the Revenue Records, it was found that Tmt. Pauline Xavery, w/o. Raymond Xavery of Thirukanji Revenue Village is holding land in excess of ceiling limit and the Authorised Officer issued summon to the Assessee Tmt. Pauline Xavery on 22-04-1975 to file a return in respect of her holdings in the Union territory of Puducherry on and from the appointed day i.e., 24-0l-1971 with all the required particulars under the section 8 (1) of the Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973. In response to the summon served, the assessee had filed the return in Form-2 declaring her family land holding to an extent of 09-95-95 Ha. at Thirukanji Revenue Village. But, the scrutiny of the revenue records highlighted that the land stands registered in the name of Tmt. Pauline Xavery, w/o. Raymond Xavery, her son Thiru George Emile Xavery, s/o. Raymond Xavery and her daughter Josaline Xavery, d/o. Raymond Xavery. Hence, the assessee Tmt. Pauline Xavery was summoned for enquiry by the Authorised Officer to assess surplus holdings as per the extent and rules therein.

During the enquiry, Tmt. Pauline Xavery had stated that the entire property had been inherited from her father Thiru Rayappan Xavery and partition was effected on 23-12-1968 among the family members i.e., between herself, her son Thiru George Emile Xavery and her daughter Josaline Xavery. Further, the assessee stated that her son was major on the date of partition itself, hence, his share may be excluded and her daughter being unmarried as on the appointed day i.e., 24-0l-1971, her share may be included in calculating the total extent of land held by the family.

Accordingly, on perusal of the documents and on consideration of the request, the Authorized Officer had declared that the total extent of land held by the family Tmt. Pauline Xavery as on appointed day is 6.5475 Std. Hectares and thus family headed by Tmt. Pauline Xavery is having the land in excess of the ceiling area prescribed under the Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973.

3. Subsequently, the Authorised Officer had published draft statement under section 9 (5) notifying that the land to an extent 12-96-55 Ha. which is equivalent to 6.00 Std. Hectares in Thirukanchi Revenue Village to be declared as retention portion of the assessee within the ceiling limit and the land to an extent 1-64-25 Ha. equivalent to 0.5475 Std. Hectares in Thirukanchi Revenue Village to be declared as surplus portion, vide Extraordinary Gazette No. 170, dated 01-10-1975.

4. Whereas, after receipt of the Gazette copy of the draft statement notified under section 9 (5) of the Act, the Assessee filed an objection statement before the Authorised Officer on 03-11-1975 stating that under section 4 (4) of the Act it is provided that "in calculating the extent held by any person, any land which was transferred by sale, gift or otherwise or partitioned by that person after the appointed day, but, before the commencement of this act, shall be taken into account as if, such land had not been transferred or partitioned as the case may be" and as such the properties were partitioned before the appointed day and before the commencement of the act, her daughter's share shall be excluded from the total holding, if it is so, there will not be any surplus portion as per the act. 5. Whereas, after conducting due enquiry under section 9(6) of the Act, the Authorised Officer had overruled the objection raised by the assessee on the ground that her daughter Tmt. Jospine Xavery was unmarried as on 24-01-1971 and as per section 2(10), read with section 4(2) of the Act, "Family means, the person, the wife or husband as the case may be and his or her minor sons and unmarried daughters and all the lands held individually by the member of a family or jointly by some or all the members of such family shall be deemed to be held by the family." Hence, the Authorised Officer stated that the property standing in the name of her unmarried daughter Jospine Xavery had been rightly included in the holdings of the family as per the Act.

6. Whereas, the Government vide G.O. Ms. No. 1, dated 01-01-1976 had approved to notify the final statement under section 17(1) of the Act in Form-13 and the Authorised had effected publication in the Extraordinary Gazette No. 9, dated 12-01-1976 notifying that the surplus land specified in the below Schedule is required for a public purpose and accordingly, the notification was served to the assessee and also published in the notice-board of Villianur Commune Panchayat and Villianur Sub-Taluk Office as a information to the public that the surplus land is required for public purpose.

THE SCHEDULE

1. Serial Number

: 1

2. Name and address of the Holder of the Surplus land : Tmt. Pauline Xavery, w/o. Raymond Xavery,

No.73-A, Nidarajapayar Street, Puducherry.

3. Region

: Puducherry

4. Taluk

: Villianur Sub-Taluk

5. Village

: Thirukanchi

7. And whereas, Aggrieved by the order of the Authorized Officer, the assessee had preferred appeal before the Land Tribunal in LTCMA 3 of 1976. The Land Tribunal in it's order, dated 10-03-1976 allowed the appeal and ordered as follows:

"The lands held by Josseline Marie Savary, daughter of Pauline Savary and wife of Jean Mare Rene Ambou as contained in Part-III of the Partition Deed, dated 23-12-1968 are ordered to be excluded from the lands of Mrs. Pauline Savary".

8. And whereas, the Authorized Officer against the LTCMA order, preferred Civil Revision Petition before the Hon'ble High Court, Chennai vide SR. No. 41210 of 1976.

9. And whereas, the Authorised Officer issued proclamation under Rule 22 of the Pondicherry Land Reforms (fixation of ceiling on land and disposal of surplus lands) Rules, 1975 that the surplus lands acquired to an extent of 1-64-25 Ha., equivalent to 0.5475 Standard Hectares in Survey Number 219-bis 1/2 pt. (Correlating to R.S. No. 99/2A/1) of Thirukanchi Revenue Village are declared as surplus and it is required for public purpose and deemed to be vested with the Government free from all encumbrances vide order, dated 22-09-2009 of the Authorised Officer (Land Reforms).

10. And whereas, aggrieved by the proclamation order of the Authorized Officer, a Writ Petition in W.P.No. 8080 of 2012 has been filed by the purchaser of the surplus land Thiru P.A. Vasudevan, challenging the proclamation order proceedings of the Authorised Officer, dated 22-09-2009. Wherein, the Hon'ble Madras High Court has ordered as follows in its judgment, dated 26-08-2021.

"Accordingly the order, dated 22-09-2009 passed by the third respondent in proceedings No. 2978/SCRS/ LR/C1/2008-09 is hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to restore the revenue records in favour of the petitioner herein within a period of two weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this Order".

11. And whereas, the Additional Government Pleader for Puducherry, High Court, Chennai, has given the legal opinion as follows:

"It is not a fit case for filing Writ Appeal. However, in the event of successfully tracing the status of Civil Revision petition and found pending with the Hon'ble High Court, writ appeal or review can be filed against the order, dated 26-08-2021 passed in W.P No. 8080 of 2012".

12. And whereas, the status of civil revision petition couldn't be traced in this office and in the office of the Government Pleader for Puducherry, High Court, Chennai, and also unlikely to trace it in the registry as the case is a very old one almost 4½ decades old.

13. And whereas, Law Department, Government of Puducherry, has opined as follows:

"it is pertinent to state that due to non-preference of appeal in the said Land Reforms case, the order of the Land Tribunal has attained finality and continue to prevail as on date and binding on the respondents. Hence, this Department is of the view that there is no scope for filing an appeal against the order of the Hon'ble Single Judge in the abovesaid Writ Petition. In view of the above, the order of the Single Judge, Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras may be compiled with by restoring the revenue records in favour of the petitioner." 14. Now, therefore, in compliance with the LTCMA order, dated 10-03-1976 and order, dated 26-08-2021 of the Hon'ble Madras High Court and in view of the facts stated above, I, Rishita Gupta, I.A.S., Sub-Collector (Revenue) South-cum-Authorised Officer (Land Reforms), hereby order that the Land Reforms proceedings initiated against Tmt. Pauline Xavery, w/o. Raymond Xavery of Thirukanchi Revenue Village under the Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973, shall be treated as withdrawn.

RISHITA GUPTA, I.A.S., Authorised Officer (Land Reforms).

————

கினீflமுங்த் ∂டு∑ ÷Õm ƒ\B WÆk™∫Ô^ \uÆD k¬‡A mÁ≈

2. மு\ரிஞி, ரீணூஙிழ்று> ஸ்ரீங்ஞிறு\ஙிக்ஷி' கீரூளீ˛க்ஷ்ைஞி ஸ்ரீ✓க்ஷிறூக்| முளீஞூ {ரூ கி]ஙி ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிஞி ∂று\ழ்னீ கீரூளீ˛©✓னீ ள[ுஙிறு\ஙிக்ஷி>னீ டி[ஞூ ∂டுங்க்ஷி_ 'றூ>©✓|˛≈னீ.

(∂´∑ gÁð ✓ÈkÁÔ ®ı 23/÷ƒW./ºÔV.4/2022/94, Amflºƒˆ, ÂV^ 2022 } º\ | 04 {)

ரீறுப

3. டில்முளீ, 1972ஊரீஞி ரீı|, கினீflமுங்த் ள'னீ ங்\ஙி கீஞூளீல்∫'^ ங்க்துஞி 4(1)ஊரீஞி ∏த்s[ˇணு ளீஷ்∫'©✓க்|^· ∂]'க்ஷிடு∫'று·fl ஸ்ரீங்ரிழ்], கி னீ fl மு ங் த் , ஜ்ழ்னீ\க்ஷித்ஙிஞி\[ மு'க்ஷிறீ_ ஜி], ∂றூ^tக்ஷ் ஜ்ழ்னீ\க்ஷித்ஙிஞி\[ மு>ளீநு>க்ஷில்ழ்]uக்ஷ், ∏[ளீறூஞி ஸீ'னீ னு✓ரூ'று· ை ஸ்ரீ'க்ஷிıது {ரூ ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிழ்று> ∂டு∑ நீதுல்Ωஙிக்ஷி' ∂று\˛ை≈னீ:ஊ

கினீflமுங்த், ஜ்ழ்னீ\க்ஷித்ஙிஞி\[ மு'க்ஷிறீ_ ஜி], ∂றூ^tக்ஷ் ஜ்ழ்னீ\க்ஷித்ஙிஞி\[ மு>ளீநு>க்ஷில்ழ்]uக்ஷ், ∂டு∑ ரீறுப ✓ணூளீறு' டிı 14/ளங்கீ./மு'க்ஷி.4/2016, னுக்ஷி^ 02ஊ09ஊ2016ஊ[ யிணூஞி {ரூ ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிஞி ∂று\'ை©✓க்துனீ. ளளுளீ≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிழ்][ ✓>s'ைக்ஷிணூஞி ஜ்Ωளீறுது'னீsக்துனீ.

(1) ]றூ. மு'க்ஷி>ıது✓க்ஷிநூ, . . >றுணூளீரூ >/ஸ்ரீ✓. ஜ்–ங்க்ஷிt, டிı 72, ∂'ைக்ஷிங்க்ஷிt \துஞி ஜி], ளீ.நீ.ணி. னு'ரூ, ஜ்ழ்]ஙிக்ஷி_மு✓க்றுது, கினீflமுங்த்.

(2) ]றூ\] 'றுணூளீக்ஷிநூ, . . னீறுபழ் '/ஸ்ரீ✓. நீ>ஙிக்ஷ்\க்ஷிரூ, >றுணூளீரூ டிı 11, 2ஊளீனீ க்ஷ்ஞூக்ஷ்ை ஸ்ரீ>றூ, ∂©✓க்ஷிகு னு'ரூ, ளீக்ஷிறுஷ்க்ஷ்ை·ஞி, கினீflமுங்த்.

(3) ]றூ. ∑முடுவீ,

. . ஸ்ரீங்ஙிணூக்ஷி·ரூ >/ஸ்ரீ✓. டுக்ஷி˝, டிı 49, ஸ்ரீங்க்Ω ஸ்ரீ>றூ, கினீflமுங்த்.

6. ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிழ்][ ✓>s'ைக்ஷிணூஞி ளளுளீடுங்க்ஷிறுப ∏≈©∏'ை©✓க்து மு>]றீஷீறூ'னீ யி[ஞூ ரீı|'^ ரீக்ஷ்ஞி. ள>u˛றுதுறீ_ ∂டு∑ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிழ்று> ழு˛ைல்க்ஷி_ >sடு ∂_ணூனீ >க்ஷ்] ளஷ்'ைfl ஸ்ரீங்தி>க்ஷி_ >sடு ∂_ணூனீ ளீக்ஷித்ஙி நீஞூ©∏ல்ரூ'^ >∫'·னீ ✓>s'று· ளடுக்ஷிர்ல்க்ஷி\க்ஷி ஸ்ரீங்தி•∫'க்ஷி_ ∂ளீரூ'π[ ளடுக்ஷிர்ல்க்ஷி\க்ஷிறுளீ ∂டு∑ ∞uஞூஸ்ரீை'க்ஷிıதுக்ஷி_ >sடு, ளீக்ஷித்ஙிஞி/ ளீக்ஷித்ஙி நீஞூ©∏ல்ரூ'^ ✓>sறீ_ ளறூ©✓>க்ஷி' ை 'றூ>©✓|ஞி.

(னீறுபகீறுணூ ரீ"னுத்[ ரீறுப©✓Ω)

∂ .∂ .∂ .∂ .∂ . ணிணிணிணிணி ளீளீளீளீளீ ங் ∫ங் ∫ங் ∫ங் ∫ங் ∫ ''''' டு [டு [டு [டு [டு [ ,,,,, ∂´∑ ƒVÏAfl ÿƒBÈÏ (ºÔVl_Ô^).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DEPARTMENT OF HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND WAKF

(4) ]றூ. ∂ஷ்க்ஷ்∏^று· (டி) டுக்ஷிமுிவீ, . . ஸ்ரீ✓க்ஷிறூ·க்ஷி·ரூ (G.O. Ms. No. 24/CHRI/T.2/2022/88, Puducherry, dated 4th May 2022) >/ஸ்ரீ✓. ∑'>டுயிரூழ்], டிı 100, ஸ்ரீ✓றூ\க்ஷி^ மு'க்ஷிs_ ஜி], கினீflமுங்த்.

(5) ]றூ. ங்'க்ஷிஙினுக்ஷி>[ ✓க்ஷிநுமு', . . நீஞூ©∏ல்ரூ >/ஸ்ரீ✓. ✓க்ஷிநுமு' ங்க்ஷிஞி✓ணிளீஞி, டிı 67, மு\க்| ஸ்ரீ>றூ, க்ஷ்றூ∑க்ஷ்ை©✓ஞி, கினீflமுங்த்.

4. கி]ஙி ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிஞி நீதுல்Ωஙிக்ஷி' ]றூமுை'க்ஷிறீ_ கீறூளீக்ஷி'ழ்று> ∂>[ ∂றுங்•ஞி, ∂றுங்ஙிக்ஷிfl ஸ்ரீங்க்ஷிழ்னீ'ை^ \uஞூஞி ள > டு ரீ ளீ ப ∫ ' " து [ ✓ > s s ணூ க்ஷ் ஞி ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிழ்]துtறூ'னீ ∞uஞூஸ்ரீை'க்ஷி^"\க்ஷிஞூ ∂ுகுஞூழ்>©✓|˛≈னீ.

5. 1972ஊரீஞி ரீı|, கினீflமுங்த், ள'னீ ங்\ஙி கீஞூளீல்∫'^ ங்க்துஞி \uஞூஞி ∂>[ˇணு ளஙிu≈©✓க்து s]'"க்ஷ்ைக்✓க்|, ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிஞி ]றூமுை'க்ஷிறீறுணூ கீரூளீ˛'ைை 'துறு\©✓க்துனீ ரீக்ஷ்ஞி. மு\ரிஞி, கீரூளீக்ஷி'ழ்]ல்ரூ 'றுது∏Ω'ை முளீıΩஙி ணிணூ ஜ்˛ைஙி ✓நூ'^ ˇமுஷ் ஸ்ரீ'க்ஷி|'ை©✓க்|^·ல்.

(i) மு'க்ஷிறீரிக்ஷ்ைfl ஸ்ரீங்க்ஷி'>\க்ஷில் 'க்ஷிஷீ \றுல்'^, மு'க்ஷிறீறுணூ ∑uு•^· ளது∫'^ \uஞூஞி மு'க்ஷிறீ_ க்ஷ்·∫'று· #ரூளீக்ஷிறூ>_/∑ழ்>ஞி ஸ்ரீங்தி>_ ளறுளீ'று· நீ^·து˛ைஙி {ரூ ரீıதுுறுை'றீறுல் ங்\ரூ©∏ழ்>_ முளீı|ஞி.

(ii) னு[ஸ்ரீ'க்ஷிறுதுஙிக்ஷி·ரூ'·க்ஷி_ மு\uஸ்ரீ'க்ஷி^·©✓|ஞி ✓நூ'று· கீறு≈முளீu≈ ஜ்ற யிfl∑து[ ~|✓|>_ முளீı|ஞி.

(iii) ய்ளுஸ்ரீளீக்ஷிறூ ளீறூதுழ்]uக்ஷ்\க்ஷில் நீழ்மு>ங் ளீடுகு, ஸ்ரீங்ணூகு 'பக்ஷ்ை'^ \க்ஷிரூfl \க்ஷி> 'க்ஷிணூழ்]uக்ஷ்^ ங்\ரூ©∏ழ்>_ முளீı|ஞி.

(iv) மு'க்ஷிறீ_ ளீடுகு, ஸ்ரீங்ணூகு 'பக்ஷ்ை'று· ஜ்று≈ஙிக்ஷி' ✓டுக்ஷி\த்ழ்>_ \uஞூஞி ∂'ைப˛ைறுல் ரீı|க்ஷ்ை ய்றூஜ்று≈ 'பக்ஷ்ை \uஞூஞி 'றூ∆ணூ'ழ் னீறு≈ யிணூஞி >நூறுை' ஸ்ரீங்தி>றுணூ நீஞூ] ஸ்ரீங்திஙிமுளீı|ஞி.

(v) ∂≈∫'க்ஷிளீணூரூ ளீக்ஷித்ஙிஞி >ல்னீ ' து று \ ' று · • ஞி , ஸ்ரீ✓க்ஷிஞூ©கி'று·•ஞி ள'னீ ங்\ஙி ரீணூஙி s]'^, 1975ஊ[ ∏த்கு 5-ள[ ✓Ω ஸ்ரீங்ளுளீமுல் கீறு≈முளீuஞூ>_ முளீı|ஞி.

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, Sri Venkateswara Devasthanam, Group of Temple, Yanam, was administered by Thiru Shivaraj Meena, then Regional Administrator, Yanam vide Order No. 1221/Secretary (TCP, HSG and HRI)/2020 dated, 24-08-2020 of the Secretary, Hindu Religious Institutions, Puducherry.

2. And whereas, it is necessitated for the constitution of a new Board of Trustees to administer the affairs of the said Devasthanam effectively.

3. Now therefore, in exercise of the power conferred under sub-section (1) & (1A) of section 4 of the Puducherry Hindu Religious Institution Act, 1972, the Government hereby constitute immediately the Boards of Trustees to Sri Venkateswara Devasthanam, Group of Temple, Yanam, as follows:-

(1) Thiru Kapaganti Uma Shankar, . . President S/o. Kapaganti Pullaiah, No. 1-534, Radha Nagar, Yanam-533 464.

(2) Thiru Yalla Meerayya, . . Vice- S/o. Yalla Venkata Reddy, President D. No. 2-3-005, Ambedkar Nagar, Yanam-533 464.

(3) Thiru Akula Nageswara Rao, . . Secretary S/o. Narayana, No. 2/7, 008, Golagabathulavari Street, Yanam-533 644.

(4) Thiru Kada Venkateswara Rao, . . Treasurer S/o. K. Vadapatti, D. No. 4-558, Kakivari Street, Yanam-533 464.

(5) Tmt. Gandham Mahalakshmi, . . Member GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECRETARIAT WING)

W/o. Gandham Sankara Rao, 4-7-018, Sitarama Street, Yanam-533 464.

(G.O. Ms. No. 02, Puducherry, dated 09th May 2022)

5. The Board shall administer the said Devasthanam as envisaged in the provisions of the Puducherry Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1972, and the rules framed thereunder. Further some important duties and responsibilities of Trustees are given below:

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation the following Vice-Principals are admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 31-05-2022.

Sl. Name of the Name of the

No. Vice-Principal Institution

(i) Submission of Annual Report by the Trustees for maintenance of the temples as mandated under rule 13 including vacant areas adjacent a n d belonging to the temple and desilting/cleaning of temple ponds.

(1) (2)

(3)

Thiru/Tmt.:

(ii) Make efforts to undertake works under Shramdaan as per rule 13 (9).

(iii) Timely submission of annual budget as per section 13 of the Act.

(iv) Maintenance of accounts and carrying out of audit, as contained in sections 14 to 17 of the Act. (v) Shall render such duties as may be entrusted and contained in rule 5.

6. The trustees of the abovesaid Board shall hold office for a term of three years from the date of issue of this order unless they are removed or disqualified or their resignations are accepted of otherwise they cease to be the Members of the Board.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

A. SIVASANKARAN, Under Secretary to Government (Temples).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY 1 M. Rajasekaran Theerar Sathiamurthy Government Higher Secondary School, Murungapakkam, Puducherry.

2 S. Satyavathi M.O.H. Farook Maraicar G o v e r n m e n t G i r l s ' H i g h e r Secondary School, Kalapet, Puducherry.

3 B. Bhanumathi Kannagi G o v e r n m e n t G i r l s ' H i g h e r Secondary School, Villianur, Puducherry.

4 R. Parthiban Indira Gandhi G o v e r n m e n t H i g h e r Secondary School, Indira Nagar, Puducherry.

(By order)

V. SOUMYA, Under Secretary to Government (School Education).

DEPARTMENT OF HINDU RELIGIOUS

INSTITUTIONS AND WAQF

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (G.O. Ms. No. 26/US(Waqf)/T.10/2022/95, Puducherry, dated 09th May 2022) LABOUR DEPARTMENT

ORDER

(G.O. Rt. No. 70/Lab./AIL/T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 10th May 2022)

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 2 of the Kazis Act, 1880 (Central Act XII of 1880), the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, hereby appoints Shri. P. Mohamed Sultan Maricar, son of Packir Shaib Maricar, residing at No. 65, Duplex Street, Karaikal, to be another Kazi for Karaikal of the Union territory of Puducherry until further orders.

2. The Kazi shall ensure that all records shall properly be maintained.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

A. SIVASANKARAN, Under Secretary to Government (Waqf).

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Larsen & Toubro Private Limited, (Timber Shop Unit) Karasur, Puducherry and L&T Jananayaga Thozhilalargal Sangam, over illegal retrenchment of 129 workers at L&T (Timber Shop Unit), Karasur, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether any employer - employee relationship exists between the 129 retrenched workmen (Annexure-A) and the management of M/s. Larsen & Toubro Private Limited (Timber Shop Unit), Karasur, Puducherry?

(b) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner's Union L&T Jananayaga Thozhilalargal Sangam (Affiliated with AICCTU), over retrenchment of 129 workers (as mentioned in the Annexure) during the year 2018 by the management of M/s. Larsen & Toubro Private Limited (Timber Shop Unit), Karasur, Puducherry, is legal and justified? If, justified, give appropriate directions?

(c) To what relief the 129 retrenched workmen, represented by the L&T Jananayaga Thozhilalargal Sangam (Affiliated with AICCTU), are entitled to?

(d) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

ANNEXURE

3 I. Kalaivanan

4 S. Baskar

5 D. Murugan

6 C. Ayyanar

7 J. Dipankar Manna

8 M. Kishor Kumar Sety

9 B. Tapas Bera

10 Goutham

11 Iyappan

12 R. Rakesh Chandra Sethi

13 Manikandan

14 D. Sunil Kumar Doss

15 P. Krishna Sharma

16 A. Swapan Nayak

17 Rajendrakumar

18 S. Ponnidoss

19 P. Iyyappan

20 Venketesan

21 Arumugam

22 D. Palanivel

23 V. Senthil

24 R. Surajith Bera

25 L. Jakesh Kumar

26 L. Ramesh Sing

27 N. Goutam Pahari

28 Suny Kumar

29 Arul Kumar

30 R. Rinku Baral

31 Murugavel

32 K. Ranjithkumar

33 T. Sanmugarajan

34 Bijayakumar Mallik (Shesadeb Sethy) 35 R. Raja Baral

36 R. Perumal

37 M. Ramakrishnan

List of 129 Retrenched Workmen

Sl. No. Name of the Contract Workmen (1)

(2)

1 S. Sridhar

2 I. Anandhan

38 R. Yuvaraj

39 V. Velu

40 A. Gangachalam

41 M. Ramar

42 S. Dhineshkumar382 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [24 May 2022 (1) (2) (1) (2) 43 C. Veeramuthu

82 A. Dipakumar Nayak

44 R. Kaliyamoorthy

83 Prasanjit Bhuniya

45 S. Giridarikumar Bhara

84 Ramkumar Sundar

46 P. Gajindra Gadatya

47 R. Srimata Maity

85 R. Suresh

86 S. Ranjan Kumar

48 Ramasamy

87 B. Sunakar Swain

49 Ilayaraj

88 R. Rakesh Lenke

50 N. Biswanath Das

89 K. Manikkannan

51 R. Rajkishor Nayak (Raju Naik) 90 S. Dhivyanathan 52 Seenuvasan

53 Gugan

54 Arun

55 Thiilai Govindan

56 K. Anbarasan

57 A. Peeterpandyaraj

58 P. Iyyanar

59 D. Karthikeyan

60 R. Kartik Chandra Das

91 P. Govindhan

92 K. Prabakaran

93 S. Sakthivel

94 Abhimanu Das

95 Bakiya Raj

96 Senthil

97 Narayanasamy

98 Senthil

99 V. Gopalakrishnan

61 P. Sukdevmirdha

100 G. Upendra Mohanthy

62 K. Arabinda Maity

63 B. Ratan Mirdha

101 S. Ilayaraja

102 P. Chandrakumar

64 Gurai Bera

103 A. Sukadevmirdha

65 Kamal Kurla

66 S. Murugaiyan

67 D. Deventhiran

68 Lenin

104 P. Suni Suter

105 A. Arjun Luha

106 Sasidharan

107 Sundaran Krishnan

69 Sudhakar

70 G. Natarajan

71 I. Munusamy

72 Balamurugan (Neelamegam) 73 D. Moorthy

74 R. Suresh

75 K. Jeyakumar

76 K. Sundharajan

77 S. Raja

78 S. Rajakumar

79 E. Gnanaprakasam

80 P. Kumar

108 Subash

109 Balaji

110 Surya

111 K. Tamizharasan

112 A. Elumalai

113 Pradap

114 P. Babu

115 P. Anilsutar

116 T. Tapas Kapat

117 Mohan Raj

118 Sathish

119 D. Arul (Arumugam)

81 A. Shivkumar

120 M. Jagathesan24 May 2022] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 383 (1) (2) ANNEXURE 121 K. Vijayakumar

122 N. Velmurugan

123 P. Dhanajeyan

124 Ashok

125 Ulaganathan

126 Jayakumar

127 A. Sudhakar

128 S. Sathish

129 N. Elayaraja

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (a) Whether any employer - employee relationship exists between 57 workmen affected due to closure (as mentioned in the Annexure) and the management of M/s. Larsen & Toubro Private Limited Timber Shop Unit, Karasur, Puducherry?

(b) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner's Union L&T Jananayaga Thozhilalargal Sangam, over closure of Larsen & Toubro Private Limited, Timber Shop Unit at Karasur Village, Puducherry, with effect from 10-02-2021 is legal and justified? If justified, to give appropriate directions?

(c) To what relief the 57 workmen affected due to closure of the Timber Shop Unit represented by the L&T Jananayaga Thozhilalargal Sangam (Affiliated with AICCTU) are entitled to?

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(d) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(G.O. Rt. No. 71/Lab./AIL/T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 10th May 2022)

NOTIFICATION

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

ANNEXURE

List of 57 Workmen Affected due to Closure

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Larsen & Toubro Private Limited, Karasur, Puducherry and L&T Jananayaga Thozhilalargal Sangam (Affiliated with AICCTU), over closure of Timber Shop Unit at Karasur in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

Sl. No. Name of the Workmen

(1)

(2)

1 P. Selvam

2 V. Thiagarajan

3 D. Karunamoorthi

4 S. Gurumoorthy

5 R. Pattabi

6 S. Mohan Dass

7 S. Pachamuthu

8 R. Elumalai

9 A. Muthaiyan

10 R. Ayyanar, S/o. Ramachandran

11 P. Somasuntharam

12 T. Mohan Doss

13 V. Veerappan

14 A. Pilvendiran

15 E. Palani

16 G. Prabagaran

17 R. Ayyanar, S/o. Rajalingam384 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [24 May 2022 (1) (2) 18 K. Gnanapragasam GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G.O. Ms. No. 51, Puducherry, dated 11th May 2022)

19 G. Dhanasekaran 20 G. Sakthivel

21 H. Sankar

22 M. Suresh

23 V. Azhagammal 24 M. Ganga

25 D. Banumathi

26 T. Valarmathi

27 M. Mangavartha 28 R. Kullapattu

29 J. Pachaiyammal 30 E. Kullammal

31 N. Meena

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, Thiru V. Chitrarasu, Assistant Engineer, holding the current duty charge of the post of Executive Engineer and deputed to Puducherry Slum Clearance Board, Puducherry, is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 31-05-2022.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE, Under Secretary to Government (Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND ANIMAL WELFARE

32 K. Sithammal

No. 2504/DAH & AW/Estt./A1/RTI/2022/425.

33 K. Navammal

Puducherry, dated 11th May 2022.

34 M. Chandira

35 G. Porselvi

36 K. Anjalachi

37 M. Kala

38 P. Neela

39 R. Kanniyammal 40 S. Rukmani

41 K. Chanthira

42 K. Jayabharathi

NOTIFICATION

In supersession of the earlier orders, the Competent Authority, in pursuance of the provision contained in section 5(1) and 5(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, has redesignated the following Officers as Public Information Officers and First Appellate Authority in respect of the regions mentioned against them:

Sl. Designation of the Region No. Public Information

Officer/First Appellate

Authority

43 A. Valli

44 M. Thamarai Selvi (1) (2)

(3) Public Information Officers

45 S. Anandhi

46 A. Sumathi

47 A. Saroja

48 A. Mani

49 Mani

50 Pondiayan

51 Kumar

52 Sadhasivam

1 Joint Director, Puducherry region (Livestock Health).

2 Joint Director, Karaikal. Karaikal region 3 Veterinary Assistant Mahe region Surgeon, Mahe.

4 Veterinary Assistant Yanam region Surgeon, Yanam.

First Appellate Authority

53 Dhayalan

54 Moovendhan

55 Krishnamoorthi 56 lyyanar

57 Panneerselvam Director Puducherry, Karaikal, M a h e a n d Ya n a m regions.

(By order)

DIRECTOR.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

(G.O. Rt. No. 72/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 13th May 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt. No. 82/AIL/Lab./T/2021, dated 14-12-2021 referred an in d u s t r i a l di s p u t e b e t w e e n t h e m a n a g e m e n t o f M/s. Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited, Sedarapet, Puducherry and its Union Workmen represented by Hindusthan National Glass Employees Welfare Union – INTUC, Puducherry and the HNG Industries Thozilalar Nala Sangam, affiliated with CITU, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, over matters concerning strike, lockout, wage revision and alterations of service conditions;

And whereas, vide Proceedings No. 333/JUD/IT- CUM-LC/PDY/2021, dated 23-12-2021, the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Judicial Department, Puducherry, stated that the reliefs prayed for in the Industrial Disputes raised between management of M/s. Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited, Sedarapet, Puducherry and the Union Workmen represented by Hindusthan National Glass Employees Welfare Union – INTUC, Puducherry and the HNG Industries Thozhilalar Nala Sangam, affiliated with CITU, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, are clubbed together as a single dispute in the above notification and directed to issue separate notification in respect of the dispute raised to the concerned Tribunal/Court;

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the management of M/s. Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited, Sedarapet, Puducherry, against the Union Workmen represented by (i) Hindusthan National Glass Employees Welfare Union – INTUC, Puducherry and (ii) HNG Industries Thozhilalar Nala Sangam, – (CITU), Puducherry, over strike is justified or not? If justified, what relief the management is entitled to?

(ii) Whether declaring lock out to all permanent workmen under section 24 (3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and thereafter functioning of the factory with staff/contract labourers is justified or not? If justified, what relief the permanent workmen are entitled to?

(iii) Whether alteration of service conditions of 47 workmen during the pendency of conciliation proceedings which is in violation of section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is justified or not? If justified, what relief the 47 workmen are entitled to?

(iv) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 73/Lab./AIL/T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 13th May 2022)

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms .No. 20/9/Lab./L., dated 23-05-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), and in supersession of the G.O. Rt. No. 82/AIL/ Lab./T/2021, dated 14-12-2021, save as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the dispute mentioned below in the annexure, be referred to the Honorable Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Honorable Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Swadeshi Panchalai Thozhilalar Urimai Padukappu Sangam and Sri Bharathi Mills Thozhilalar Urimai Padukappu Sangam filed Writ Petition Nos. 5360 and 5365 of 2021 before the Honorable High Court Judicature at Madras, over closure of the two Mills, viz., Swadeshi Cotton Mill and M/s. Sri Bharathi Mills;

2. And whereas, the Honorable High Court vide order, dated 31-12-2021 allowed the Writ Petitions and both the impugned notice, dated 29-09-2020 were set aside with the direction that amount already received386 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [24 May 2022 (b) Whether the list of 42 employees identified by the management of M/s. Swadeshee – Bharathee Textile Mills Limited, may be treated as the employees who have protested the closure of the two mills; and (c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

under protest shall be adjusted and the remaining amount shall be paid within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and that in the meanwhile, it is open to the employer to make afresh application for closure of the Undertaking in terms of the provisions of the Act, if so advised, after complying with the mandatory statutory provisions and after the waiting period, if any, provided under the Act, the matter may be taken up by the Authority concerned and that the Court, is of the view that Corporation is a part of the Government of Puducherry and in case any closure application is filed, it can be scrutinized by the concerned authority and the matter can be straight away referred to a Tribunal, so that, instead of two adjudications, namely, one before the Authority and the other one before the Tribunal, a comprehensive decision can be taken;

(G.O. Rt. No. 74/AIL/Lab.,/T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 13th May 2022)

3. And whereas, the management of M/s. Swadeshee – Bharathee Textile Mills Limited vide Letter No. SBTML/ WP 5360 & 5365 of 2021/2203, dated 01-04-2022, filled Form – "Q" under section 25FFA of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 towards the Closure of M/s. Swadeshee – Bharathee Textile Mills Limited, Puducherry;

4. And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L., dated 23-05-1991, of the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the notice of closure given by the management of M/s. Swadeshee – Bharathee Textile Mills Limited, in respect of 42 employees is justified or not? If justified, what relief/remedies they are entitled to?

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt. No. 82/AIL/Lab./T /2021, dated 14-12-2021 referred an in d u s t r i a l di s p u t e b e t w e e n t h e m a n a g e m e n t o f M/s. Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited, Sedarapet, Puducherry and its Union Workmen represented by Hindusthan National Glass Employees Welfare Union – INTUC, Puducherry and the HNG Industries Thozilalar Nala Sangam, affiliated with CITU, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, over matters concerning strike, lockout, wage revision and alterations of service conditions;

And whereas, vide Proceedings No. 333/JUD/IT- CUM-LC/PDY/2021, dated 23-12-2021, the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Judicial Department, Puducherry, stated that the reliefs prayed for in the industrial disputes raised between management of M/s. Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited, Sedarapet, Puducherry and Union Workmen represented by Hindusthan National Glass Employees Welfare Union – INTUC, Puducherry and the HNG Industries Thozhilalar Nala Sangam, affiliated with CITU, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, are clubbed together as a single dispute in the above notification and directed to issue separate notification in respect of the dispute raised to the concerned Tribunal/Court.

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L., dated 23-05-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), and in supersession of the G.O. Rt. No. 82/AIL/ Lab./T/2021, dated 14-12-2021, save as respects things24 May 2022] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 387 done or omitted to be done before such supersession, it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the dispute mentioned below in the Annexure, be referred to the Honorable Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Honorable Industrial Tribunal shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses, with the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Union Workmen represented by (i) Hindusthan National Glass Employees Welfare Union – INTUC, Puducherry and (ii) HNG Industries Thozhilalar Nala Sangam, Puduchery – CITU against the management of M/s. Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited, Sedarapet, Puducherry, over charter of demands/wage revision is justified or not? If justified, what relief the Union Workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

And whereas, the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, has by Notification in G.O. Ms. No. 9/95/Lab., dated 07-04-1995 under sub-section (1) of section 52 of the Pondicherry Shops and Establishments Act, 1964, authorized the Secretary to Government, Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers of the Government under section 6 of the said Act, relating to exemption;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the said Act, the Secretary to Government, Labour Department, Puducherry, hereby exempts M/s. Shanmuga Cinemas, M/s. JR Cinemas, M/s. Ashok Theatre A/C, M/s. The Cinema Providence, M/s. Raja Talkies and M/s. Rathnaa Talkees, Puducherry, from the provisions of sections 16(1), 17(1), 17(2) and 18 of the Pondicherry Shops and Establishments Act, 1964, for conducting special morning shows as per Table below:

TABLE

Sl. Name of the Name of the Date and time No. theatre movie of screening (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 M/s. Shanmuga Don 13-05-2022 to Cinemas, 15-05-2022 @ Screen-1 and 2, 5.30 a.m. and Puducherry. 8.30 a.m.

(4 shows).

D. MOHAN KUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY 2 M/s. JR Cinemas, Don 13-05-2022 @ Screen-1 and 2, 5.00 a.m and Puducherry. 8.00 a.m.

14-05-2022 and 15-05-2022 @ 8.00 a.m.

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

3 M/s. Ashok Theatre A/C, Don 13-05-2022 @ (G.O. Rt. No. 75/Lab./G/2022, Puducherry, dated 13th May 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the managements of M/s. Shanmuga Cinemas, M/s. JR Cinemas, M/s. Ashok Theatre A/C, M/s. The Cinema Providence, M/s. Raja Talkies and M/s. Rathnaa Talkees, Puducherry, have applied for grant of exemption from certain provisions of the Puducherry Shops and Establishments Act, 1964, to conduct special morning shows on account of screening new films;

Villianur, 5.00 a.m. Puducherry. 13-05-2022 to 15-05-2022 @ 9.00 a.m. 4 M/s. The Cinema Doctor 13-05-2022 to Providence, Strange 15-05-2022 @ (Screen – 1, 2, 3, and 7.30 a.m. 4 and 5) Don Puducherry.

5 M/s. Raja Talkies A/C, Don 13-05-2022 @ Pududcherry. 5.00 a.m. and

9.00 a.m.

(1) (2) (3) (4) GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

6 M/s. Rathnaa Talkees, Don 13-05-2022 @ Pududcherry. 5.00 a.m. and (G.O. Ms. No. 09, Puducherry, dated 16th May 2022)

8.00 a.m. 14-05-2022 and 15-05-2022 @ 8.00 a.m. The conduct of the special shows shall be subject to the following conditions:

1. Every person employed shall be paid overtime wages for the period of work done by him in excess of 8 hours in a week.

2. The persons employed shall be given rest interval of atleast half-an-hour for every four hours of work.

3. The management should obtain permission from the authorities concerned wherever necessary.

4. In case, the said screening of the new film does not take place, this notification shall have no effect.

5. The SOPs issued in respect of COVID-19 like wearing of mask and other conditions issued by the Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Puducherry, shall be strictly adhered to.

(By order)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation the following, Associate Professors are admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 31-05-2022.

Sl. Names of the Name of the No. Associate Institution Professors

(1) (2)

(3)

1 Thiru D. John Sudhakar Bharathidasan Government

C o l l e g e f o r Wo m e n ,

Puducherry.

2 Dr. M. Mari Bhat M a h a t m a G a n d h i

Government Arts College,

Mahe.

(By order)

M.V. HIRAN,

D. MOHAN KUMAR, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

Under Secretary to Government

(Higher and Techncial Education).

∂ˆBV∫z©✓D∂ˆBV∫z©✓D∂ˆBV∫z©✓D∂ˆBV∫z©✓D∂ˆBV∫z©✓D ÿÔVDR[ÿÔVDR[ÿÔVDR[ÿÔVDR[ÿÔVDR[ ✓fiƒVB›m✓fiƒVB›m✓fiƒVB›m✓fiƒVB›m✓fiƒVB›m, AmflºƒˆAmflºƒˆAmflºƒˆAmflºƒˆAmflºƒˆ

g✓›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^g✓›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^g✓›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^g✓›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^g✓›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂ுs©கி

ˇணுக்ஷ்ைு©∏து©✓க்|^· னு✓ரூ ∂த்ஙிக்ஷி∫க்ஷ்©✓ஞி ஸ்ரீ'க்ஷிஞிஸி[ ✓fiங்க்ஷிஙிழ்னீ டி_றுணூக்ஷ்ை^ ∏[ளீறூஞி ஸ்ரீ>க்ஷிணீ_ கீஞூளீல்ழ்று> ∂று\ழ்னீஸ்ரீை'க்ஷி^· ளஸ்ரீை'க்ஷிஞிஸி[ ✓fiங்க்ஷிஙிழ்][ ∂–\] முளீı|˛≈க்ஷிரூ.

ளீத்றுங் sıப©✓>க்ஷிடுத்[ கீஞூளீல்ஞி ∂று\ஙி நீ^· நீழ்மு>ணி'ை©✓க்|^· மு>றுளீஙிக்ஷில் ரீக்'π[ டிı ஸ்ரீ✓ஙிரூ \uஞூஞி ஜ்'ளீத் ளதுழ்][ ஜ்'ளீத் கீஞூளீல்ழ் >ஙிக்ஷித்©கி/ t[ ]≈[ டிıநூறுை' (1) (2)

(3) ஸ்ரீங்திஜ்று≈

(4) (5) (6) 1 ]றூ\] நீ\க்ஷி\மு'நுளீத், M/s. நீ\க்ஷி\மு'நுளீத் ∏·ளீரூ t_, \க்ஷிகு ∂≈றுளீபூைதுஞி 20.00 H.P. 3 '/ஸ்ரீ✓. ஸ்ரீ>[ல்டு∑, \ஞூ ∂·றுளீ டிı 95/5, \பஸ்ரீளீπ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞி, \பஸ்ரீளீπ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞி, {றுதுஸ்ரீளீπ ஜி], {றுதுஸ்ரீளீπ ஜி], (]ஸ்ரீடு·✓]ஙிஞி\[ மு'க்ஷிறீ_ ஜி]), (]ஸ்ரீடு·✓]ஙிஞி\[ மு'க்ஷிறீ_ ஜி]), \பஸ்ரீளீπ, கினீflமுங்த், \பஸ்ரீளீπ, கினீflமுங்த்,

(✓நூ ஜ்று≈ ய்[ஞூ \க்|ஞி).