Puducherry Gazette, No. 8, 21 February 2023

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ ÿkπX| Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\ 2023 } ∏©´kˆ | 21 {

No. 8 Poudouchéry Mardi 21 Février 2023 (2 Phalguna 1944)

No. Puducherry Tuesday 21st February 2023

ÿ✓VÚ·¶¬ÔD SOMMAIRES CONTENTS

Page ✓¬ÔD Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ .. 172 Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 172 Award of the Labour Court .. 172

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s©AÔ^ .. 179 Notices du Gouvernement .. 179 Government Notices .. 179 ∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 183 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 183 Government Notifications .. 183 g✓›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^ .. 187 Etablissements dangereux .. 187 Dangerous Establishments .. 187

.. 187 Announcements .. 187 ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 187 Annonces

[171]172 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [21 February 2023 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 190/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 28th December 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D. (L) No. 25/2017, dated 28-11-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Puducherry, in respect of Dispute between the Management of M/s. PASIC, Limited, Puducherry and P A S I C Wo r k e r s U n i o n o v e r r e i n s t a t e m e n t T h i r u P. Annadassane and Thiru D. Tillegovindane with back wages.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with the notification issued in Labour Department's G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said Award shall be published in the Official Gazette, Puducherry.

K . S u n d a r a j a n , P. K a l i r a t h i n a m , S . Vi j a y a s a n t h i , T. Vijayashanthi and K. Manopriya, Counsels for the Respondent and after hearing the both sides and perusing the case records, this Court delivered the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government of Puducherry, vide G.O. Rt. No. 63/AIL/Lab./T/2017 dated 27-04-2017 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to resolve the following dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz., (a) Whether the dispute raised by the PASIC Wo r k e r s U n i o n a g a i n s t t h e M a n a g e m e n t o f M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited (PASIC), Puducherry over reinstatement of Thiruvalargal P. Annadassane and D. Tillegovindane with back wages is justified or not? If justified, what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms of money, if it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred in

(By order)

the claim petition:

P. RAGINI, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present : Tmt. V. Sofana Devi, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 28th day of November, 2022.

I.D. (L) No. 25/2017

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000102-2017

The President, PASIC Workers Union, No. 7-8, Moovendar Street, Mullai Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director, M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited (PASIC), Agro House, Thattanchavady, Puducherry.

. . Respondent This Industrial Dispute coming on 09-11-2022 before m e f o r f i n a l h e a r i n g i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f T h i r u P. Sankaran, Counsel for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal B. Mohandoss, P. Manivannan, Indrajith, K. Velmurugan, Thiru P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane are the President and Secretary of the Petitioner Union called PASIC Workers Union. D. Tille Govindane joined in service on 01-01-2003 and P. Annadassane on 11-10-2004 respectively under the Respondent as workman. Both of them were issued with Identity Cards and Employee's data sheets were secured from them in the year 2012. EPF deductions were made from their salary from the year 2005 as per the practice followed by the Respondent. Mr. P. Annadassane was in service till 16-07-2014 and D. Tille Govindane till 19-07-2014 respectively without any remark to the satisfaction of their superiors whatsoever till they were refused employment orally by the Respondent.

(ii) All of a sudden both were refused employment and disengaged from 16-07-2014 and 19-07-2014 respectively without any reason except that they formed an Union and extended moral support to the fraternal Unions functioning in PASIC which clearly amounts to victimization and unfair labour practice for which the PASIC Workers Union objected and sent a letter dated 11-08-2014 to the Respondent and pleaded for restoration of both the workmen with back wages and continuity of service etc., followed by the Government Employees Associations letter, dated 23-09-2014 in which the PASIC Workers Union is affiliated.

(iii) When the Union Office bearers and the Confederation Office bearers met the Respondent, he said that the disengagement was done as per the orders of the Chairman. But the Chairman refused to meet them informing that the Respondent only would decide the matter. That when the same leaders met the Secretary to Government he assured that the matter would be decided in the governing body and they would be reinstated with the approval of the governing body. But finally, the Respondent replied to the workman D. Tille Govindane through letter dated 05-08-2015 that the question of reinstatement does not arise and so on when there are about 250 workmen recruited along with them and continued in service. Both P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane were working for more than 10 years without any remark and so the Respondent cannot say that both of them are not workmen or disengage them calling by some designation or the other which is against law and justice and also the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The R e s p o n d e n t 's d i s e n g a g e m e n t a n d r e f u s a l o f employment to the workmen is clearly biased, arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal even without giving an opportunity of enquiry, terminal benefits etc., after completion of 10 years of service which is against law and natural justice.

(iv) The Respondent also admits the averments of the Petitioner Union's averments regarding the recruitment of service of both P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane in the counter filed before Labour Officer (Conciliation) but gives many meaningless and untenable averments regarding the status and nature of their job etc., which are not genuine, reasonable and lawful for a public sector undertaking like PASIC which is not any man's personal property.

(vii) If at all the Respondent is genuine and appointed the said two workmen as per the Service Rules 1988, under rule 7 classification of posts he should have issued appointment order at least under category D with a scale of the maximum of which is less than ` 1,150 per month to both of them with effect from their respective dates of appointment and they cannot be made the scapegoats for the commissions and omissions of the Respondent.

(viii) As per the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 the said workmen P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane could not have been appointed as casual labour since definition of casual labour under the Act is not applicable to them as they were working throughout the year without any break continuously and also for more than 10 years which confer them status of permanency of employment. That as per the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 also since they have completed more than 240 days of continuous service they are entitled to be treated as permanent for all purposes.

(ix) The Petitioner Union made several representations to various Authorities and since there was no solution or remedy raised an Industrial disputes before the Labour Officer (Conciliation), vide letter dated 11-02-2016 for which the Respondent filed a reply dated 09-06-2016 and Petitioner Union filed a rejoined to it on 04-07-2016 for which the Respondent filed reply dated 22-08-2016 and 12-09-2016 and since there was no amicable settlement the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry made failure recommending for adjudication by this Court by report dated 17-02-2017. Both the Petitioners have worked for more than 10 years without any remark to the satisfaction of their superiors and there is no opportunity for alternative employment and source of income for their livelihood and their dependent parents, wife and children would be put to many hardships and handicaps and their future is dark and gloomy. Hence the Petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent as follows:

(v) Once they were appointed they are governed by law and entitled for benefits under the Industrial laws and the Respondent is also bound by such laws. They worked for more than 10 years continuous service in public sector undertaking like PASIC and the Respondent is restrained from disengaging them especially, when more than 200 similar workmen are allowed to continue in service saying that the question of reinstatement does not arise.

(vi) In PASIC Staff Service Rules, 1988 as there is no educational and other qualifications prescribed for any post under chapter III rule 7 classifications of posts where there are grades from A, B, C and D with only some difference in the quantum of salary between them. There are no classifications like daily wages, voucher-paid or casual labourers with rules of recruitment, wages or allowance, leave rules, etc., the workmen P. Annadassane and D. Thille Govindane cannot be disengaged.

Mr. D. Tille Govindane and Mr. P. Annadassane joined the service of the Respondent as workmen on 01-01-2003 and 11-10-2004 respectively. But, the Petitioner Union has conveniently omitted to state that they were initially engaged as voucher paid workmen from the above stated days and they were made daily rated labour with effect from 17-11-2005 and 01-10-2005 respectively. It is also admitted fact that deduction towards EPF have been effected from the year 2005 onwards till they were disengaged with effect from 19-07-2014 and 16-07-2014 respectively.

Petitioner Union has stated that workmen P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane are entitled to be treated as permanent as they have completed more than 240 days of continuous service. The petitioner is not justified in reading between the lines to suit its convenience by wrong interpretation of law. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.

4. Rejoinder petition Filed by the Petitioner

against the Counter Statement:

(ii) The Thiruvalargal P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane were only daily rated casual employees and they were engaged on day-to-day basis depending upon exigencies of work prevailing in the organization. Their employment was need based one without any assurance for continuance of employment. The above casual labour were not recruited in a formal manner in accordance with rules and regulations relating to appointment. Such persons employed not have right to hold the post in PASIC. The conditions of service cannot be equated to regular employees as well as permanent employees appointed in accordance with Recruitment Rules. Under such circumstances, they cannot have any grievance for their disengagement. Moreover, their disengagement was without any motive or malafide intention as alleged by the Petitioner Union.

(iii) As pointed out in the letter, dated 05-08-2015 addressed to Thiru Tille Govindane, the question of reinstatement does not arise since he was engaged only to do casual work on account of exigencies of work and as per PASIC Staff Service Rules 1988 "Employee" meant a person who is in the whole time employment of the Corporation but does not include persons employed on daily wages. The same status only can be accorded to Thiru Annadassane and so he cannot claim reinstatement. The dispute has been raised by PASIC Workers Union, RTU/1709/2012 on behalf of Annadassane and Tille Govindane, stating that they are the President and Secretary of the said Trade Union. As such it becomes necessary to find out whether such Union is on the live registers of the Registrar of Trade Unions, Puducherry and whether that Union has got locus standi to raise dispute on behalf of Thiruvalargal P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane. As such the issue relating to locus standi of the Petitioner Union to raise the dispute be decided in the first instance before giving a finding on other issues involved in the claim petition.

The burden of proof lies on the Respondent to define the meaning of refusal of employment or non-employment or disengagement from service or abandonment of service or removal of name of the Petitioner from attendance register for unauthorized absence, etc., if no termination of service as mentioned in para 3 of the counter statement filed by the Respondent Management.

(ii) The Petitioner was only daily rated casual employee and he was engaged on day-to-day basis depending upon exigencies of work whereas he contradict the same in which he admits the continuous engagement of the Petitioner as daily rated casual for years together which is illegal and cannot come under the definition of casual labour. If the disengagement was without any motive or malafide, then whatever reason for disengagement of the President and Secretary of the Petitioner Union when all other about 250 workmen were continuously engaged who were recruited along with them which remains a million dollar question till date.

(iii) When the Respondent utterly failed to issue any letter till 05-08-2015 after disengagement with effect from 16-07-2014 and 19-07-2014 for nearly one year and it was issued only after they made grievance petition to the Central Home Ministry as mentioned in the reference which exposes the fact that the Respondent was least bothered about the law and practice to be followed by an Authority in Public Sector undertaking in dealing with the life and death problems of employers. Hence the Prayer.

5. Point for determination:

(iv) The daily rated casual employees cannot claim treatment on par with regular employees. Continuous engagement of daily-rated casuals for years together cannot confer on them right to regularization so as to make them included in their cadre strength. They do not have right to hold the post and hence cannot claim protection when their services are disengaged by their employer. The above rule is applicable to all the employees, irrespective of the fact whether they are engaged in Trade Union work or not.

(v) The Petitioner Union has quoted several statutory provisions out of context and without understanding their legal significance. For example the Whether the claim Petitioners Thiruv a la rg a l P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane are entitled for an order of reinstatement with back wages and other relies as claimed in the claim petition?

5A. On Point:

Thiru. Annadassane himself examined as PW1 and Ex.Pl to Ex.P15 were marked. On Respondent side, Thiru. Sivashanmugam, the Managing Director of the Respondent Management was examined as RW1 and Ex.R1 marked.

6. On the point:

This Industrial Dispute has been referred by the Government of Puducherry over reinstatement of Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane with back wages. The admitted facts are both were initially engaged as voucher paid employees with effect from 01-01-2003 and 11-10-2004 respectively under the Respondent Management. It is also an admitted fact that deduction toward EPF have been deducted and effected from the year 2005 till they were disengaged. From the exhibits it could be seen that, the Respondent Management also issued Identity Cards (Ex.Pl & P2) to the claim Petitioners Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane. The Respondent Management had also issued employer data sheet for Mr. Tille G o v i n d h a n ( E x . P l ) o n 1 5 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 2 a n d f o r Mr. Annadassane (Ex.P2) on 16-03-2012. It is also an admitted position between the parties to this dispute that both Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane were orally informed about their disengagement.

7. The point of dispute arises is that according to the Petitioner Union all of a sudden without prior notice and reasons, the Respondent Management refused employment to Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane orally which amounts to clear case of victimization.

8. Whereas, on the side of the Respondent Management, it is contended that Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane were only daily rated casual labours and they were engaged on day to day basis depending upon exigencies of work prevailing in the Organization. Their employment was need based one without any assurance for continuance of employment. They are casual labourers and not recruited in a formal manner in accordance to Rules and Regulations relating to appointments. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Management would also refer the cross examination of PW1 and submitted that while deposing before this Court he has admitted the same.

9. The relevant portion is produced hereunder for better appreciation ÂV–D ]_ÁȺÔVsÕ>–D 11-10-2004 º>]l_ g´D✓ WÁÈl_ Voucher paid workmen ®[≈ WÁÈl_ ✓Ël_ ∂\Ï›>©✓'º¶VD ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ∏[ÂVπ_ ]™¬Ìo ªaBÏÔ·VÔ 01-10-2005 \uÆD 17-11-2005 x>_ ✓ˬz ∂\Ï›>©✓'º¶VD. 2005-D gı| x>_ PF ∏Ω›>D ÿƒFB©✓'¶m ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ∂ÀkVº≈ 16-07-2014 x > K D 1 9 - 0 7 - 2 0 1 4 x > K D ® ™ ¬ z D ]Ú. ]_ÁȺÔVsÕ>–¬zD ®]Ï\–>V´Ï WÏkVÔ›>V_, ✓Ë \Æ©A ÿƒFB©✓'¶m ®[≈VKD ƒˆ>V[. ]™¬Ìo ªaBÏÔ^ ∂[≈V¶D º>Ák¬ºÔu✓, ∂Àk©º✓Vm WBt¬Ô©✓|kVÏÔ^ ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. WÏkVÔ›][ º>Ák¬ºÔu✓ WBt¬Ô©✓'¶>V_, ]™ƒˆ ✓Ë kw∫Ô©✓|D ®[≈ cÆ]l_ÈV\_ WBt¬Ô©✓'º¶VD ®[≈V_ ƒˆB_È. ÂV∫Ô^ º>Ák¬ºÔu✓ ]™ƒˆ ªaBÏÔ·VÔ WBt¬Ô©✓'¶ WÁÈl_ Staff Service Rule 1988á[✓Ω WBt¬Ô©✓¶s_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È. ✓Ël_ ºƒÏ©✓>uz x[✓VÔ ºÂÏÔVð_ ¶›>©✓'¶m ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È. x>ÈÁ\flƒˆ[ ✓ˆÕmÁ´l[º✓ˆ_ ÂV–D, ]_ÁȺÔVsÕ>[ ®[✓kÏ ∂Á\flƒÏ ]Ú. Â\flEkVBD ∂kÏÔπ[ ✓ˆÕmÁ´l[º✓ˆ_ WBt¬Ô©✓'º¶VD. Staff Service Ruleá[✓Ω ÂV∫Ô^ WBt¬Ô©✓¶s_ÁÈ ®[≈VKD ∂>™V_ ✓Ël_ ¿Ω©✓>uÔV™ cˆÁ\ ºÔVÚD ∂ÚÔÁ>l_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È. ºkÁÈ kVF©A ∂KkÈÔD JÈ\VÔ°D ÂV∫Ô^ ✓Ë WB\™D ÿƒFB©✓¶s_ÁÈ ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[.

10. Further PW1 deposed that, ®[Á™•D ]_ÁȺÔVsÕ>Á™•D 16-07-2014 \uÆD 19-07-2014 º>]Ôπ_ ✓Ë \Æ©A ÿƒF>VÏÔ^ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆ>V[. ∂Õ> ✓Ë \Æ©A¬z ®]´VÔ ÂV∫Ô^ ®Õ> cˆÁ\•D ºÔV´ >z]l_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È. WÏkVÔ ∂]ÔVˆÔ"¬zD ®∫Ô"¬zD ÷Á¶ºB ®Õ>s> ÔÚ›m ºkÆ✓V|D, sº´V>xD ÷_ÁÈ. 2012áD gı| PASIC Workmens Union ®[≈ ÿ✓Bˆ_ ÿ>Vauƒ∫ÔD ÿ>V¶∫˛º™VD. ∂]_ ÂV[ >ÁÈk´VÔ°D. ]_ÁȺÔVsÕ>[ ÿƒBÈV·´VÔ°D ÷ÚÕº>VD. ÿ>Vauƒ∫ÔD g´D∏¬Ô©✓'¶ ÂV^ x>_ ®∫Ô"¬z 2014áD gı| ✓Ë \Æ©A ÿƒF> ÂV'Ô^ kÁ´ WÏkVÔ›]uz ®∫Ô^ *m ®Õ> zu≈flƒV'|D ˛Á¶BVm. ∂>™V_ WÏkVÔD ®∫ÔÁ· ✓a kV∫zD ∂kEBt_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È.

11. PW1 further deposed before this court as, ®∫Ô^ WÏkVÔ›][ WB\™ s]Ôπ[ ˇµ ÿ>VaÈVπ ®[≈ kÁ´BÁ´ xø ºÂ´ ✓ËBV·Ú¬z \'|D>V[ ÿ✓VÚÕmD, ]™¬Ìo ªaBÏÔ"¬z ÿ✓VÚÕ>Vm ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ®∫Ô·V_ g´D∏¬Ô©✓'¶ PASIC ÿ>Vauƒ∫ÔD ÷[ÆÂV^ kÁ´¬zD ÷B∫˛¬ÿÔVıΩÚ¬˛≈m. ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô ✓]kV·Ï, ®∫Ô^ ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô›]uz ∂∫ˇÔV´D kw∫˛•^·VÏ. ®∫Ô·m >M©✓'¶ ✓Ë \Æ©A ƒD✓Õ>\VÔ. >VkV ÿ>V¶∫zk>uz ®∫Ô^ ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô›][ ƒVÏ✓VÔ yÏ\V™D WÁ≈ºku≈©✓'¶m. WÁ≈ºku≈©✓'¶ yÏ\V™D, ®[Æ WÁ≈ºku≈©✓'¶m ®[Æ WÁ™s_ÁÈ ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ®∫Ô^ ÷Úkˆ[ >M©✓'¶ ∏´flƒÁ™ ƒD✓Õ>\VÔ kw¬z ÿ>V¶∫zk>uz yÏ\V™D WÁ≈ºku≈©✓¶V> WÁÈl_, ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô›]uz kw¬z ÿ>V¶∫zk>uz ∂ÚÔÁ>l_ÁÈ ®[≈V_ ƒˆB_È.

12. Further, it is a case of the Respondent Management that as per PASIC Staffs Service Rules, 1988 an employee means a person who is in the whole time employment of the Corporation but does not176 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [21 February 2023 include persons employed on daily wages. The same status only can be accorded to both Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane and so they cannot claim reinstatement. Further, the learned counsel for the Respondent Management stressed upon that continuous engagement of daily rated casuals for years together cannot confer on them a right to regularization so as to make them included in their cadre strength. They don't have right to hold the post and hence cannot claim protection when their services are disengaged by their employer.

Identity Card it can be seen that he was engaged as DRL that is Daily Rated Labourer. Along with the Identity Card, his Employees Provident Fund Scheme receipt also enclosed showing that EPF has been paid for him for the Financial Year 2008-2009. Therefore, from their own exhibits namely Ex.Pl and P2 admittedly without any doubt they both were engaged by the Respondent Management from their initial induction till their disengagement as voucher paid employees, contract and as daily rated labourers. It is also not disputed on either side.

13. Therefore, the learned counsel for the Respondent Management has concluded his arguments that persons like casual labourers who were not recruited in accordance with Rules and Regulations don't have any right to hold the posts in PASIC. The conditions of service cannot be equated to regular employees as well as Permanent employees appointed in accordance with the Recruitment Rules. The learned counsel for the Respondent Management referred and relied upon the following case-laws during arguments: (i) (2016) 1 SCC (L & S) 186 Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University vs. Akhilesh Kumar; (ii) (2019) 2 SCC(L &S) 37; (iii) (2019) 2 SCC (L &S) 98 and (iv) (2011) 1 SCC (L&S) 659.

14. Heard both. Perused the records.

17. Ex.P3 is the representation of the Petitioner Union to Chairman/Managing Director of the Respondent Management (PASIC) requesting for reengagement of Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane into the service of Respondent Management, Ex.P6, Ex.P8 are the representations given by the Petitioner Union before the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Government of Puducherry. Ex.P4 and Ex.P9 are the representations given by the Petitioner Union to the Secretary (Agriculture), Government of Puducherry. All these representations given by the Petitioner Union for the same claim which was made and referred before this Court. In all these representations that is Ex.P3, Ex.P4, Ex.P6, P8 and P9, Petitioner Union has raised the same plea that Respondent Management was abruptly disengaged Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane who were casual labourers without any valid reasons and requested to restore them in the job. In addition, the Petitioner Union has produced Ex.P14 and Ex.P15 regarding unpaid wages for 18 months for the period from 2011 to 2014 to be paid to Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhan and Annadassane respectively by the Respondent Management. From the calculation made by the Petitioner Union vide Ex.P14 and P15, the arrears of wage for the said 18 months is ` 1,36,272.00 for each Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhan and Annadassane. This fact of wage arrears in Ex.P14 and P15 has not been disputed by the Respondent Management anywhere in this case.

15. On Petitioner Union side Ex.Pl to P15 were exhibited to substantiate their case. Ex.Pl and P2 are Employees Date sheet issued to both Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane. On perusal, it can be seen that Tille Govindhane's initial date of engagement is 01-03-2003 as voucher paid employee till 17-11-2005. Thereafter, he was engaged as daily rated labourer from 17-11-2005 till his date of disengagement. In Ex.Pl his Identity Card copy issued by the Respondent Management also found place. From his Identity Card it can be seen that he was engaged as DRL that is Daily Rated Labourer. Along with the Identity Card, his Employees Provident Fund Scheme receipt also enclosed showing that EPF has been paid for him for the Financial Year 2006-2007 and 2005-2006.

18. During arguments the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner Union submitted that having deducted the EPF, they have to be considered as full time workmen, illegal denial of employment is violative of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. The above said argument seems to be incorrect for the reason that EPF is a Social Security benefit such Provident Fund must be provided to all employees/workers who are engaged on contract/casual/daily wages basis 16. On perusal of Ex.P2, it can be seen that Mr. Annadassane's initial date of engagement is 11-10-2004 as contract employee till 30-09-2005. Thereafter, he was engaged as daily rated labourer from 01-10-2005 till his date of disengagement. In Ex.P2 his Identity Card copy issued by the Respondent Management also found place. From his21 February 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 177 since there is no distinction between a person employed on permanent, temporary, contractual or casual basis under section 2(f) of the EPF Act. Therefore, having EPF account and deductions effected thereon, they should be considered as Permanent Employee is not an acceptable argument. Thus rejected.

19. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in RBI vs. S. Mani reported in (2005) 5 SCC 100 held that in law 240 days of continuous service by itself does not give right to claim permanence. Further, it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthy vs. State of Bihar reported in 1997 IV ADSC 196 that admittedly they were not appointed to the posts in accordance with the rules but were engaged on the basis of need of the work. They are temporary employees working on daily wages. Under these circumstances, their disengagement from service cannot be construed to be a retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act. The concept of 'retrenchment' therefore, cannot be stretched to such an extent as to cover these employees. Although by way of definition of workman under section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act 'daily wage' worker also falls within the definition of workman it cannot be said that daily wages have all the rights and duties which are available to the regular employee of the Respondent Management.

20. The same view has been taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana vs. Jasmer Singh reported in (2015) 4 SCC 458 that persons who were employed on daily wages cannot be treated as on a par with persons in regular service holding similar posts. Daily rated workers are not required to possess the qualification prescribed for regular workers, nor do they have to fulfill the requirement relating to age at the time of recruitment. They are not selected in the manner in which the regular employees are selected. In other words the requirement for selection are not as rigorous. There are also provisions relating to regular service such as the liability of a member of the service to be transferred, and this being subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the authorities as prescribed, which the daily rated workmen are not subjected to. They cannot, therefore, be equated with regular workmen for the purpose for their wages. Nor can they claim the minimum of regular pay scale of the regularly employed.

21. Undisputedly, in the present case both the claim Petitioners Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane were daily wage labourers. Hence, they have no right to the posts because the appointment of daily wages are made by not complying or observing the procedural formalities in consonance to any rules, regulations or by observing the procedures prescribed for the recruitment. Engagement of the daily wager commences and ends every day. There is a contractual deployment for every day. It is up to the Employer/Respondent Management to allow to continue the employment or disengage the daily wager at any time in absence of work.

22. In view of the decision in Magarasem vs. State of UP and others reported in 2002 (2) AWC 1712 the daily wagers engaged without any written appointment order could be terminated without any written Order. Therefore, daily and casual workers who are engaged in disregard of all rules cannot be allowed to continue when there is no work and their engagement is not required. Daily wagers are deployed on temporary assignment only and not on sanctioned posts and even if completion of 240 days work by daily wager cannot attribute status of casual workman under Industrial Disputes Act and as such it does not create right to claim for reengagement as claimed in the petition.

23. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India upheld in various cases that compelling the Management employer to observe or to engage continuously the persons who were engaged by the Respondent Management as casual workers/daily rated labours for a long period on the ground that such a practice is violative of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution would itself offend another aspect of Article 14 that is by choosing initially such persons without any rational procedure recognized by the Rules and Regulations or by law but to continue them in engagement of services without any need or exigencies would definitely deprive eligible candidates who were similarly situated to compete for such employment.

24. In view of the above ratios held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in various occasions it could be seen that it is again and again reiterated that daily wager cannot have a right to hold the claim for reengagement. Hence, this Court is of the considered view that the claim for seeking an order directing reinstatement of service as daily rated employees, with continuity of service and back wages cannot be sustained.

25. In the result, the Reference is decided as Unjustified and the Industrial Dispute is dismissed. No Costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 28th day of November, 2022.

V. SOFANA DEVI, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

Ex.P9 — 18-07-2016 Photocopy of the letter petition by the Confederation

of Puducherry Government

Employees' Association to

the Secretary to Government

(Agriculture), Puducherry.

Ex.P10 — 22-08-2016 Photocopy of the reply (to the Rejoinder) of the List of petitioner's witness:

PW1 — 06-02-2019 Annadasane

Respondent Management

to the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

List of petitioner's exhibits:

Ex.Pl — 05-03-2012 Photocopy of the Employee Data Sheet, Employee Identity Card and EPF Slip of the Tillegovindane.

Ex.P2 — 06-03-2012 Photocopy of the Employee Data Sheet, Employee Identity Card and EPF Slip of the Annadassane.

Ex.P3 — 11-08-2014 Photocopy of the letter given by the Petitioner Union to the Respondent Management.

Ex.P4 — 23-09-2014 Photocopy of the letter given by the Confederation of Puducherry Government Employees' Association to the Respondent Management.

Ex.P5 — 05-08.2015 Photocopy of the letter given by the Respondent Management to the Petitioner Tillegovindane.

Ex.P11 — 12-09-2016 Photocopy of the letter given by the Respondent

Management to the Labour

Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry stating the

non-appearance in the

Conciliation Proceedings.

Ex.P12 — 17-02-2017 Photocopy of the Failure Report given by the Labour

Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P13 — 27-04-2017 Photocopy of the Notification of the Labour

Department, Puducherry.

Ex.P14 — July 2011 to Photocopy of the Pending March 2014 Salary Arrear detail of

Annadassane.

Ex.P15 — July 2011 to Photocopy of the Pending March 2014 Salary Arrear detail of Tille

Govindane.

List of respondent's witness:

Ex.P6 — 11-02-2016 Photocopy of the representation submitted by the Petitioner Union before the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.

RW10 — 05-07-2022 K. Sivashanmugam, Managing Director, PASIC, Puducherry.

List of respondents's exhibits:

Ex.P7 — 09-06-2016 Photocopy of the reply l e t t e r g i v e n b y t h e Respondent to the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.

EX.R1 — — Photocopy of the PASIC

(Staff Service) Rules, 1988.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Ex.P8 — 04-07-2016 Photocopy of the Rejoinder given by the Petitioner Union to the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (WOMEN), FRENCH SECTION

Puducherry, dated 30th January 2023.

NOTICE

FRENCH PUBLIC EXAMINATION – MARCH 2023

The various French Public Examinations will be held on the dates and places indicated in the following statements:

Sl. Name of the Date of Place of Centre Place in which Date and time No. examination registration registration examinations in which the

are to be held examination

will begin (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 1 Brevet Elémentaire 01-02-2023 Office of the Deputy Puducherry St. Louis de 15-03-2023 to D i r e c t o r ( Women), Gonzague 9.00 a.m.

15-02-2023 French Education, Government Aided

Puducherry. High School,

Puducherry.

Do. Do. Office of the Chief Karaikal College Do.

Educational Officer, d'Enseignement

Karaikal. Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do. Do. Office of the Chief Mahe Ecole Centrale et Do.

Educational Officer, Cours

Mahe. Complementaries,

Mahe.

2 Certificat d'Etudes 16-02-2023 Office of the Deputy Puducherry Pensionnat de 03 - 04 - 2023 Primaires Elémentaire to Director (Women), Jeunes Filles, 9.00 a.m. de Français 28-02-2023 French Education, Mission Street,

Puducherry. Puducherry.

Do. Do. Office of the Chief Karaikal College Do.

Educational Officer, d'Enseignement

Karaikal. Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do.

Do. Office of the Chief Mahe Ecole Centrale et Do.

Educational Officer, Cours

Mahe. Complementaries,

Mahe.

N.B. :— Private candidates for "Brevet Elémentaire" and "Certificat d'Etudes Primaires Elémentaire de Français" must obtain their Hall tickets from the Headmaster of the respective Institutions at which they are to be examined during the four days before the commencement of the examination by producing a certificate of identity.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (WOMEN), FRENCH SECTION

NOTICE

FRENCH PUBLIC EXAMINATION – JUNE 2023

The French Public Examinations will be held on the dates and places indicated in the following statement:

Sl. Name of the Date of Place of Centre Place in which Date and time No. examination registration registration examinations in which the are to be held examination

will begin (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 1 Brevet Elémentaire 03-04-2023 Office of the Deputy Puducherry D. Simon Cardinal 05-06-2023 to Director (Women), Lourdusamy 9.00 a.m.

15-04-2023 French Education, Government Girls'

Puducherry. High School,

Puducherry.

Do. Do. Office of the Karaikal College Do.

Chief Educational d'Enseignement Officer, Karaikal. Secondaire, Karaikal.

Do.

Do. Office of the Chief Mahe Ecole Centrale et Cours Do.

Educational Officer, Complementaries, Mahe. Mahe.

N.B. :— Private candidates for "Brevet Elémentaire" must obtain their Hall tickets from the Headmaster of the respective Institutions (Centre of examination) at which they are to be examined during the four days before the commencement of the examination by producing a certificate of identity.

*Only candidates who have secured the minimum marks (33.33%) of the aggregate are permitted to appear for the session of June 2023 (II Session) and the Examinatiion Centres are subject to change considering the number of candidates.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD, Director of School Education.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (WOMEN), FRENCH SECTION

Puducherry, dated 30th January 2023.

NOTICE

FRENCH PUBLIC EXAMINATION – MARCH 2023

The various French Public Examinations will be held on the dates and places indicated in the following statement:

Sl. Name of the Date of Place of Centre Place in which Date and time No. examination registration registration examinations in which the are to be held examination

will begin (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 1 Brevet Elémentaire 01-02-2023 Office of the Deputy Puducherry St. Louis de 15-03-2023 to D i r e c t o r ( Women), Gonzague 9.00 a.m. 15-02-2023 French Education, Government Aided

Puducherry. High School,

Puducherry.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Do. Do. Office of the Chief Karaikal College Do.

Educational Officer, d'Enseignement Karaikal. Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do. Do. Office of the Chief Mahe Ecole Centrale et Do.

Educational Officer, Cours Mahe. Complementaries,

Mahe.

2 Certificat d'Etudes 16-02-2023 Office of the Deputy Puducherry Pensionnat de 03 - 04 - 2023 Primaires Elémentaire to Director (Women), Jeunes Filles, 9.00 a.m. de Français 28-02-2023 French Education, Mission Street,

Puducherry. Puducherry.

Do. Do. Office of the Chief Karaikal College Do.

Educational Officer, d'Enseignement Karaikal. Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do.

Do. Office of the Chief Mahe Ecole Centrale et Do.

Educational Officer, Cours Mahe. Complementaries,

Mahe.

N.B. :— Private candidates for "Brevet Elémentaire" and "Certificat d'Etudes Primaires Elémentaire de Français" must obtain their Hall tickets from the Headmaster of the respective Institutions at which they are to be examined during the four days before the commencement of the examination by producing a certificate of identity.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD, Director of School Education.

————

ETAT DE POUDOUCHÉRY

SERVICE DE L'ENSEIGNEMENT

No. (Exam.)8-49/Edn./DD/FE/EC/2023.

Poudouchéry, le 30-1-2023.

EXAMEN DU BREVET ELEMENTAIRE SESSION DE MARS 2023 CALENDRIER DES EPREUVES

Date Matiere Heures (1)

(2)

(3) Mercredi, le 15 Mars 2023 Composition Française 9h00 – 11h00 Jeudi, le 16 Mars 2023 Anglais

9h00 – 11h00 Vendredi, le 17 Mars 2023 Sciences

9h00 – 11h00 Lundi, le 20 Mars 2023 Mathématiques

9h00 – 11h00 Mardi, le 21 Mars 2023 Histoire et Géographie 9h00 – 11h00 Mercredi, le 22 Mars 2023 Orthographe

9h00 (45 minutes pour relire la dictée et répondre aux questions) Cet ordre ne doit en aucun cas être modifié.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD, Director of School Education.

ETAT DE POUDOUCHÉRY

SERVICE DE L'ENSEIGNEMENT

No. (Exam.)8-49/Edn./DD/FE/EC/2023.

Poudouchéry, le 30-1-2023.

EXAMEN DU CERTIFICAT D'ETUDES PRIMAIRES ELEMENTAIRES DE FRANÇAIS

SESSION D' AVRIL 2023

CALENDRIER DES EPREUVES

Date Matiere Heures (1)

(2)

(3) Lundi, le 3 Avril 2023 (Matinée) Composition Française 9h00

(Durée : 50 minutes)

Orthographe Française 10h00

(40 minutes pour relire la dictée et répondre aux questions)

Calcul

11h00 (Durée : 50 minutes) Lundi, le 3 Avril 2023 (Soirée) Histoire, Géographie et 14h00

Sciences.

(Durée : 50 minutes)

Anglais

15h00 (Durée : 45 minutes)

Dessin

15h45 (Durée : 30 minutes) Mardi, le 4 Avril 2023 (Matinée) Lecture et Chant

9h00 Cet ordre ne doit en aucun cas être modifié.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD, Director of School Education.

————

ETAT DE POUDOUCHÉRY

SERVICE DE L'ENSEIGNEMENT

No. (Exam.)8-49/Edn./DD/FE/EC/2023.

Poudouchéry, le 30-1-2023.

EXAMEN DU BREVET ELEMENTAIRE SESSION DE JUIN 2023

CALENDRIER DES EPREUVES

Date Matiere Heures (1)

(2)

(3) Lundi, le 5 Juin 2023 Composition Française 9h00 – 11h00 Mardi, le 6 Juin 2023 Anglais

9h00 – 11h00 Mercredi, le 7 Juin 2023 Sciences

9h00 – 11h00 Jeudi, le 8 Juin 2023 Mathématiques

9h00 – 11h00 Vendredi, le 9 Juin 2023 Histoire et Géographie 9h00 – 11h00 Lundi, le 12 Juin 2023 Orthographe

9h00 (45 minutes pour relire la dictée et répondre aux questions) Cet ordre ne doit en aucun cas être modifié.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD, Director of School Education.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION) (G.O. Ms. No. 08, Puducherry, dated 06th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , t h e following Associate Professors, shall retire on the afternoon of 28-02-2023.

Sl. Name and Name of the No. Designation institution (1) (2)

(3)

1 Dr. B. Ramachandra Reddy, Kanchi Mamunivar Associate Professor of Government Institute History.

for Postgraduate Studies and Research, Puducherry.

2 Dr. S. Babu,

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Tribunal Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Tribunal Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal Court, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

–do–

Associate Professor of History.

(By order)

M. V. HIRAN, Under Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (i) Whether the dispute raised by the REIL Electricals India Limited Welfare Union, against the management of M/s. REIL Electricals India Limited, Puducherry, over charter of demands with regard to wages revision and other Allied Welfare measures is justified or not? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) To what other relief the workmen represented by the Union are entitled to?

(iii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (G.O. Rt. No. 11/Lab./AIL/T/2023, Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023) LABOUR DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

(G.O. Rt. No. 12/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. REIL Electricals India Limited, Puducherry and REIL Electricals India Limited, Welfare Union, over charter of demands regarding wages revision and other Allied Welfare measures, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Nithya Packaging Private Limited, Puducherry and Thiru P. Sivaraman, over reinstatement along with attendant benefits, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers184 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [21 February 2023 conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner Thiru P. Sivaraman, against the management of M/s. Nithya Packaging Private Limited, Puducherry, over reinstatement along with attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified, what relief the petitioner is entitled to?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner's Union "Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam", against the Management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private Limited, Puducherry and the Petitioner's Union Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam, over strike by the Union workmen towards transfer of Union President Thiru K. Ezhumalai and Thiru S. Segar, Joint Secretary of the said Union by way of victimization is legal and justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction to what remedies to be entitled in this dispute?

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(ii) Whether the stand taken by the management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private Limited, Puducherry, regarding veracity of the Petitioner's Union duly registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 is legal and justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction.

(iii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms (G.O. Rt. No. 13/Lab./AIL/T/2023, Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private Limited, Puducherry and the Petitioner's Union Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizar Thozhir Sangam, over strike by the Union workmen towards transfer of Union President Thiru K. Ezhumalai and Thiru S. Segar, Joint Secretary, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

(G.O. Rt. No. 14/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry and21 February 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 185 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union, over breach of settlement of wage revision and other allied welfare measures, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

(G.O. Rt. No. 15/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union, over breach of 12(3) settlement over wage revisions and other allied welfare measures has been arrived on 07-01-2021 before the Labour Officer (Conciliation) by the management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry, is justified or not? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) During the pendency of settlement arrived between the same parties, whether the demand of the Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union for new Charter of demands towards wage revision and other allied welfare measures during subsistence of 12 (3) settlement arrived on 07-01-2021 which would remain in force up to 30-09-2024 is legal and justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(iii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Anandu Brandy Shop, Bharathi Street, Puducherry and Thiru Thamizhselvam, over his non-employment and other attendant benefits, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner Thiru S. Thamizhselvam, against the management of M/s. Anandu Brandy Shop, Bharathi Street, Puducherry, over reinstatement along with attendant benefits or ` 5 Lakhs in lieu of reinstatement is justified or not? If justified, give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

P. RAGINI, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS) LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 06, Puducherry, dated 09th February 2023)

(G.O. Rt. No. 16/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry and Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union, over payment of bonus @ 19.25% for the year 2021-22, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

NOTIFICATION

The Notice of voluntary retirement given under rule 43 (1) and (2) of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021 by Thiru M. Mahadoum, Assistant Engineer, presently holding the post of Executive Engineer on 'Current Duty Charge' basis and deputed/designated as General Manager (Planning) at Puducherry Smart City Development Limited, Puducherry, has been accepted and he is admitted into retirement with effect from the forenoon of 16-02-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Under Secretary to Government (Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING) (G.O. Ms. No. 08, Puducherry, dated 09th February 2023) Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

NOTIFICATION

The Notice of voluntary retirement given under rule 43(1) of Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 2021 by Thiru M. Kasinathan, Pondicherry Civil Service (Entry Grade) Officer ad hoc, Block Development Officer, Ariyankuppam Block, Puducherry, is accepted and he shall retire from service with effect from the forenoon of 01-03-2023.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

V. JAISANKAR, Under Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECRETARIAT WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 45, Puducherry, dated 13th February 2023)

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union, against the management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry, over payment of bonus @ 19.25% for the year 2021-22, is legal and justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Ms. M. Kannagi, Vice-Principal, Dr. Ambedkar Government Higher Secondary School, Kirumampakkam, Puducherry, is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 28-02-2023.

(By order)

F.P. VERBINA JAYARAJ, Under Secretary to Government (School Education).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY Ref. : l. This Department's G.O. Ms. No. 91/FD/F2/ A2/2022-23, dated 20-12-2022 and FINANCE DEPARTMENT

NO. 49416/FD/F2/A2/2023.

Puducherry, dated 14th February 2023.

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub. : Finance – Notification of acceptance of voluntary retirement of Tmt. A. Maria Jacintha, Senior Accounts Officer, Co-operative Department, Puducherry, Cancellation – Orders – Issued.

2. I.D Note No. 79767/Secy/Co-op/PA/23, dated 05-01-2023 of the Chief Secretariat (Cooperation), Puducherry.

The Notification of acceptance of voluntary retirement of Tmt. A. Maria Jacintha, Senior Accounts Officer, Co-operative Department, Puducherry, issued vide reference first cited stands cancelled.

(By order)

K. GOVINDARAJAN, Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

YANAM MUNICIPALITY, YANAM

Yanam, the 7th February 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested for permission to setup a new establishment to the following industry within the Yanam Municipal limits, as detailed below.

Sl. Name and address Address of the Industry Power No. of the applicant

(1)

(2)

industry site proposed requirement (3)

(4) (5) 1 Tmt. Kalla Machara Krishna Bhavani, M/s. Surya Polymers, New establishment 70 H.P. Proprietrix, D. No. 07-01-042, D. No. 05-02-088, Pydikondala Street, Yanam. Adavipolam, Yanam.

In conformity with the rule 8 of the Puducherry Municipalities (Grant of Licences and Permissions) Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973, objections, if any, for setting up of a new establishment of above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Yanam Municipality within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by the Yanam Municipality.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Heera @ Himsudha, w/o. Srihariharan, Hindu, aged about 28 years, residing at No. 211, Chetti Street, Puducherry, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:-

That I am the deponent herein.

In m y B i r t h C e r t i f i c a t e re g i s t e r e d w i t h Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry under Registration No. C/1994/02212, dated 08-09-1994, my name has been mentioned as 'Heera @ Himsudha'.

K. R A M A K R I S H N A , Commissioner. In my Elector's Photo Identity Card under No. IUM0052167, issued by the Election Commission of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Heera @ Himsudha'.

In my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9250, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Heera alias Himsudha'.

In my Bank Passbook of City Union Bank Limited, my name has been mentioned as 'Heera alias Himsudha'.

In my Bank Passbook of UCO Bank, my name has been mentioned as 'Heera alias Himsudha'.

In my PAN Card, under No. AIUPH6295G, issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Heera'.

In my Family Ration Card No. 005188, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as 'Í´V (®) ND∑>V'.

Hence, I do hereby declare that all the above-mentioned names viz., 'Heera @ Himsudha', 'Heera alias Himsudha', 'Heera' and 'Í´V (®) ND∑>V' in the above documents are referred to one and the same person i.e. myself only.

I made this affidavit in lieu proof of my names' identity.

I state that what are all stated above is true to the best of my knowledge, belief and information and nothing material has been concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of January 2023.

issued by State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh and in Master of Business Administration vide Register No. 113306, in my Hindu Marriage Register vide serial No. 323 of 2008, issued by Marriage Registrar, Villianur Sub-Registrar office, Puducherry and in my Bank Account Passbook of HDFC Bank, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as 'T.S.K.M. Prasad'.

Further, I state that in my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1550, issued by Unique Identification of Authority of India, and in my Permanent Account Number (PAN) vide No. CEVPM1629A issued by Income-tax Department, my name is mentioned as 'Thangella Palli Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad'.

Further, I state that in my Regional Passport bearing No. R0916072 issued by Regional Passport Office, Chennai, Republic of India, my surname is mentioned as 'Thangella Palli' and my given name is 'Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad'.

562225 S. HEERA @ HIMSUDHA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, T S K M Prasad son of Jayasuryam, aged about 44 years, residing at No. 39, 2nd Floor, Sundarar Street, Thirukuralar Nagar, Arumparthapuram, Villianur Commune Panchayat, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and well known the facts of the affidavit.

I hereby state that according to my Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate vide No. 155200, issued by Mandal Revenue Officer, Srisailam, Sundipenta, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh my name is mentioned as 'T. Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad'.

Further, I state that in my Secondary School Certificate, vide Registration No. 0337054, issued by Board of Secondary Education, Andhra Pradesh, in my Pass Certificate-cum-memorandum of Marks vide Registration No. 177290, issued by Board of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, in my Diploma Course Certificate vide No. 200304002, Whereas, in my Family Ration Card vide serial No. 214408, issued by the Department Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as '>∫ÔÈ©✓^π pMkVƒ ˛Úið ÿ\"Ï ∏´ƒV›'.

Hence, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid the names viz, 'T. Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad', 'T.S.K.M. Prasad', 'Thangella Palli Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad', surname 'Thangella Palli' given name 'Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad' and '>∫ÔÈ©✓^π pMkVƒ ˛Úið ÿ\"Ï ∏´ƒV›' are denoting one and same person, they referring myself only.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 10th day of February 2023.

562228 T S K M PRASAD.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mahamood Vala Ppakath, son of K.Kader Kutty @ Kallarakal Abdoulkader, aged 63 years, residing at Fadis, Manjakkal, Mahe, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. I state that my name has been entered in the Birth Certificate vide Registration No. M/1959/00309 as 'Valappagatte Poutimpoureil Abdoulla', issued by Registrar of Births and Deaths, Mahe Municipality, Mahe.

2. I state that my name has been entered as 'V.P.Mahamood' in my Family Ration Card No. 001530, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumers Affairs, Mahe, Government of Puducherry.

3. I state that my name has been entered as 'Mahamood Vala Ppakath' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 0193, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as 'Mahamood Vala Ppakath' in my Permanent Account Number (PAN) Card BIMPM8967M, issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of India.

5. I state that the above-mentioned names, viz., 'Valappagatte Poutimpoureil Abdoulla', 'V.P.Mahamood' and 'Mahamood Vala Ppakath' are referring one and same person they denoting me and my correct name is 'Mahamood Vala Ppakath'.

6. I state that to avoid the confusion and difficulties towards my various names mentioned in the above records in my present and future life, I have decided to use my name as 'Mahamood Vala Ppakath' in all my future Correspondents and records.

Therefore, I declare that hereinafter, I will be called, known and identified by the newly assumed name as 'Mahamood Vala Ppakath' only.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Mahe, on this 2nd day of February 2023.

562230 MAHAMOOD VALA PPAKATH.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, G. Jeeva, presently transgender, previously son of Govindaraj and Selvi, at present residing at the house situated at No. 4, 5th Street, Pudhu Nagar, Keezhagraharam, Villianur, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was born as a male, as such in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. PM/M/2003/5425, my name has been mentioned as 'Jeeva'.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under SL. SEC 9275599, in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate under SL.Nos. HSS 15604780, SL.No. HSF 13570582 and in my School Transfer Certificate under Admission No. 3016, my name has been mentioned as 'Jeeva. G (˝kV. ºÔV)'.

In my Permanent Integrated Certificate under No. PY/TOV/47/0032394, my name has been mentioned as 'Jeeva'.

In my Elector 's Photo Identity Card under No. TLS0272781, my name has been mentioned as 'Jeeva (˝kV)'.

In the particulars of family members, in the Family Ration Card under No. 350258, my name has been mentioned as '˝kV'.

Further, I state that later I have transformed myself to third gender and became a transgender, in the Medical Certificate, issued by the Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, dated 24-01- 2022, my name has been mentioned as 'G. Jeeva alias G.Ananya Sri'.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 8206, my name has been mentioned as 'G.Ananya Sri (ºÔV. ∂™[BV ¸Z)'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein. I state that henceforth, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'G. Ananya Sri (ºÔV. ∂™[BV p)', for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of February, 2023.

562231 G. JEEVA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, A r u n K u m a r, s o n o f R a n g a r a j a n , r e s i d i n g a t No. 25, Pajaniraja Oudayar Street, Thillaikannu Amma Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Secondary School Mark Sheet vide S.No. Sec. 3582553, in my Higher Secondary School Mark Sheet vide No. HSG 3692598, in my PAN Card vide No. AXTPA4398P, issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Arun Kumar R'.

In my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1187, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, my name has been mentioned as 'R Arunkumar'.

In my Savings Account Passbook of State Bank of India, Lawspet Branch, Puducherry, vide Account No. XXXXXXX0381, my name has been mentioned as 'Arun Kumar @ Muthukannan R'.

In my Elector 's Photo Identity Card vide No. ATT0024760, issued by the Election Commission of India, in my Indian Passport vide No. V6780641, issued by the Reginal Passport Office, Chennai, my name has been mentioned as 'Arunkumar'.

In my India Driving Licence vide No. PY01 20090002023, issued by the Assistant Licensing Authority, Transport Department, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as 'Arunkumar alias Muthu Kannan R'.

In my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. PM/M/1990/007176, issued by the Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as 'Arunkumar @ Muthukannan'.

In the Family Ration Card vide No. 010256, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as '∂Úız\VÏ (®) x›m Ôıð['.

As I have converted myself from Hindu religion to Muslim religion in the Certificate vide C.C. No. 142:32/2022, dated 27-10-2022, issued by Government Town Kazi Office, my name has been mentioned as 'Abdullah (∂©m_ÈV„)'.

In my Marriage Certificate vide Sl.No. 054, dated 28-12-2022, issued by the Masjid Nooraniya, Muthialpet, Puducherry, vide Sl.No. 054, dated 28-12-2022, my name has been mentioned as '∂Úız\VÏ @ ∂©m_ÈV„'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein. I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Abdullah'.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 13th day of February 2023.

562232 ARUN KUMAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Veerapillai Govindasamy, son of Veerapillai, Service No. JC156258P NB/Sub, aged 73 years, residing at Plot No. 120, 6th Cross Street, Thirumagal Nagar, Velrampet, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this affidavit on behalf of me.

I state that my name is entered as 'Veerapillai Govindasamy' in my Pension Payment Order, issued by the Office of the Principal, C.D.A. (Pensions), Allahabad bearing PPO No. S/028241/88 (ARMY).

I state that my name is entered as 'V Govindasamy' in my Pension Payment Order, issued by the EPF Organization Regional Office, Puducherry bearing PPO No. TBPDY00063026, dated 10-06-2007.

I state that my name is entered as 'V Govindasamy' in my Discharge Certificate Book, issued by the Indian Army.

I state that my name is entered as 'Govindasamy V' in my ECHS Card, issued by ECHS Bhawan, New Delhi bearing No. CH 0000 0506 0517, dated 26-12-2019.

I state that my name is entered as 'Govindasamy' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card, issued by the Election Commission of India bearing No. IP10161703, dated 19-10-2020.

I state that my name is entered as 'Govindasamy V' in my Secondary School Leaving Certificate, issued b y the Board High School, Peralam, Tamil Nadu bearing Sl.No. 019439, dated 22-06-1966.

I state that my name is entered as 'Govindasamy V' in my Bank Passbook, issued by the Indian Overseas Bank, Ambagarathur Branch, Karaikal, Puducherry State bearing Savings Account No. XXXXXXXXXXX1331, dated 05-09-2021.

I state that my name is entered as 'V Govindasamy' in my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India bearing No. XXXX XXXX 9067.

I state that my name is entered as 'V Govindasamy' in my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of India bearing No. AAIPG9448G, dated 15-01-2018.

I state that my name is entered as 'Govindasamy' in my Passport, issued by Regional Passport Office, Chennai, Republic of India, bearing No. U2689292, dated 06-10-2021.

I state that my name is entered as 'ºÔVsÕ>ƒVt' in my Family Ration Card, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry bearing No. 119383, dated 15-07-2005.

Therefore, I declare that the names described in the above records as 'Veerapillai Govindasamy', 'Govindasamy V', 'V Govindasamy', 'Govindasamy' and 'ºÔVsÕ>ƒVt' are referring one and the same person i.e., myself only.

F i n a l l y, I d e c l a r e t h a t m y c o r r e c t n a m e i s 'V Govindasamy' only.

The above statements in the foregoing paragraphs is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562233 VEERAPILLAI GOVINDASAMY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, R.Harini, daughter of Rajasekaran, aged 21 years and residing at No. 14, Middle Street, Kalitheerthalkuppam, Madagadipet, Puducherry-605 107, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of the deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as 'R. Harini' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7241, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, in my PAN Card No. BFPPH8092Q, issued by the Income- tax Department, Government of India.

I state that my name is entered as 'Harini' in my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. J/2001/5452, dated 09-08-2001, issued by Oulgaret Municipality, Government of Puducherry and in my Elector's Photo Identity Card No. ZFD0234658, issued by the Election Commission of India.

I state that my name is entered as '"ˆË' in the Family Ration Card No. 405295, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as 'Harini R.' in my Student Grade Report of Bachelor of Pharmacy vide Registration No. 19180226, issued by Pondicherry University, Puducherry.

I state that as per horoscope, I have changed my name as 'Keerthi R (ˇÏ›]. R)'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names, i.e., 'R.Harini', 'Harini', '"ˆË' and 'Harini R.' are referred, identified and relate to one and same person, that is myself only. Hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Keerthi R' for all purposes.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings, dealings and transactions private as well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign my name as 'Keerthi R' in place and in substitution of my former names.

I hereby verify and confirm that what has been stated above is true to the best of my knowledge and correct, and nothing material facts have been concealed thereon.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562234 R. HARINI. ————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Eugene Arokiaraj Stephens, son of K. Joseph Stephens, residing at No. 8, Vicent De Paul Street, Colas Nagar, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I my Master of Business Administration Certificate, issued by Queensland University of Technology, dated 08-03-1996, in my Joint Account Passbook of Indian Bank vide Account No. XXXXX8813, my name has been mentioned as 'Eugene Arokiaraj Stephens'.

In my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1800, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Eugene Arokiaraj'.

In my Tenth Standard Matriculation Mark Sheet, dated 13-07-1986 issued by Department of Government Examinations, Madras, in my Higher Secondary Course Mark Sheet vide Certificate No. A 828195, issued by Government of Tamil Nadu, in my Provisional Certificate vide Folio No. 2234, issued by University of Calicut, in my Bachelor of Technology in Engineering Certificate vide, dated 03-04-1993, issued by University of Calicut, my name has been mentioned as 'Eugene Arokiaraj. S'.

In my PAN Card vide No. EWNPS4325B, issued by Income-tax Department, Government of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Eugene A.Stephens'.

I n t h e B i r t h C e r t i f i c a t e v i d e R e g i s t r a t i o n No. PM/P/1971/002045, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as 'Eugene Arokiaraj Dinesh'.

In my Family Ration Card vide No. 066327, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as '•˜['.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person, that is myself the deponent herein. I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Eugene Arokiaraj Stephens'.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry vide No. 063704, the name 'Vasugi' and the surname 'krishnasamy' as found in my Passport issued by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai on 15-11-2011, the name 'Vasuki', father's name 'Sambandan' as found in my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department (SYSTEMS) vide No. AHIPV2824Q, the name 'Vasuki' as found in my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India vide No. XXXX XXXX 2941, the name 'Vasuki.K' as found in my Bank Passbook, issued by the City Union Bank Limited and also the name 'Vasuki.S' as found in my B.Sc. D e g r e e C e r t i f i c a t e , i s s u e d b y U n i v e r s i t y o f Madras are referred one and the same person that is myself.

I hereby declare that henceforth, I shall be known, called and referred only as 'Vasuki' and my surname 'krishnasamy' and not by any other name. I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings, dealings and transactions private a well as upon all occasions whatsoever use the name 'Vauki' as my name and 'krishnasamy' as my surname in place and in substitution of my other names.

I hereby declare that all the contents of my affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information, and I have now concealed any material facts or information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562236 K. VASUKI. ————

AFFIDAVIT

562235 EUGENE AROKIARAJ STEPHENS.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, K. Vasuki, wife of Krishnasamy, aged 58 years, residing at No. 66, Kamatchi Amman Koil Street, Rajbhavan, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I was born at Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu on 04-12-1964 and my name 'Vasuki' as found in my Birth Certificate, registered in the Cuddalore Municipality on 24-12-1964 under Registration No. 656/1964/06, the name 'Vasuki' as found in the Family Ration Card, I, J Vincent Gnanasamy Amalraj, son of Jeyaraj, residing at No. 25, First Street, Salavaiyar Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and well aware of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as 'J Vincent Gnanaswamy Amalraj' in my Enrollment Roll No. 818/1987, issued by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as 'Vincent Gnanasamy Amalraj. J' in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate No. A229812, issued by Government of Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as 'J Vincent Gnanaswamy Amalraj' in my Provisional Certificate No. 105, issued by University of Madras, Madras.

That my name is mentioned as 'J Vincent Gnanasamy Amalraj' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7127, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

I state that my name is mentioned as 'Vincent Gna.Amalraj' in my Electoral Identity Card No. PY/ 01/004/015316, issued by Election Commission of India.

That my name in short form is mentioned as 'J.V.G. Amalraj' in my Bank Safety Locker Memorandum of Loan Deposit No. B-63, issued by the Bank of India, Southern Zone, dated 12-12-1994.

That my name is mentioned as 'J.V.G. Amalraj' in my LPG Consumer Book No. 17302771, issued by the Tillai Agencies, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 's[ÿƒ[' QV™ƒVt ∂\_´VÎ' in my Family Ration Card No. 086230, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

Hence, I hereby declare that the abovesaid names viz., 'J Vincent Gnanaswamy Amalraj', 'Vincent Gnanasamy Amalraj. J', 'J Vincent Gnanasamy Amalraj', 'Vincent Gna.Amalraj', 's[ÿƒ[' QV™ƒVt ∂\_´VÎ' and 'J.V.G. Amalraj' are referring one and the same person, they denoting myself only.

Hence, this sworn in affidavit may kindly be accepted to this effect.

I take oath and solemnly declare/affirm that the particulars furnished by me above are correct and that I have not concealed or misrepresented any facts.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

That I am the deponent herein. I am fully aware of the facts of the affidavit.

I state that my name has been mentioned as 'Naseemunisha Begam' (1) in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. 312/1975/3, dated 21-05-1975, issued by the Commissioner, Villupuram Municipality, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply, Government of Tamil Nadu, (2) in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 0574, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, (3) in my Bank Passbook vide Account No. XXXXXX5667, issued by Indian Bank, Kamaraj Salai Branch, Puducherry and (4) in my PAN Card No. CKAPN6450M.

I state that my name has been mentioned as 'Sajitha Begum' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card bearing No. JGW0133793, issued by Election Commission of India.

I state that my name has been mentioned as 'ÂÊxM≠V º✓ÔD' in my Family Ration Card bearing No. 65639, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names, i.e., 'Naseemunisha Begam', 'Sajitha Begum' and 'ÂÊxM≠V º✓ÔD' are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is myself only. Hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Naseemunisha Begam' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 10th day of February 2023.

562238 NASEEMUNISHA BEGAM.

————

AFFIDAVIT

562237 J VINCENT GNANASAMY AMALRAJ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Naseemunisha Begam, wife of Syed Amjath Ali @ Syed Amjath and daughter of Syed Nazeer Ahamed, Muslim, aged about 47 years, residing at No. 16, First Floor, First Cross Street, Thirumal Nagar, Kuyavarpalayam, Puducherry-605 013, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

I, P. Ellappan, son of Poucheppalingame, Indian inhabitant, aged 46 years and residing at the house bearing Door No. 12, Bharathipuram Main Road, Govindasalai, Puducherry-605 011, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Certificate of Birth under Registration No. 1240/76 and in my Marriage Certificate under No. 107, my name has been mentioned as 'Elleappin'.

In my Record Sheet under No. 127652, my name has been mentioned as '®_È©✓['.

I n m y E l e c t o r 's P h o t o I d e n t i t y C a r d u n d e r No. TMC0102665, my name has been mentioned as 'Yellappan (®_È©✓[)'. In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 9466, my name has been mentioned as 'P Ellappan (✓ ®_È©✓[)'.

In my Driving Licence under DL No. PY01 19980004683, my name has been mentioned as 'Ellappan @ Ramesh'.

In my PAN Card under No. AGJPR9342R, my name has been mentioned as 'P.Ramesh'.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 423431, my name has been mentioned as '®_È©✓[á´º\i'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent herein.

I declare that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name with initial and spelling as 'P.Ellappan (A.®_È©✓[)' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 16th day of February 2023.

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate under Registration No.P/1972/03543, my name has been mentioned as 'Maguesh'.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under S.No. A 3197943 and in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate under Certificate S.No. A 2055891, my name has been mentioned as 'Magesh.G'.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificates under S.Nos. A3475474 & A 4281897, my name has been mentioned as 'G. Magesh'.

In my Elector 's Photo Identity Card under No. PY/01/020/030430, my name has been mentioned as 'Magesh (\ºÔi)'.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 7670, my name has been mentioned as 'Magesh (\ºÔi)'.

In my PAN Card under No. AQOPM2949l, my name has been mentioned as 'Magesh'.

In my Passport under No. A6378954, my given name has been mentioned as 'Maguesh'.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 177588, my name has been mentioned as '\ºÔi'.

Therefore, I do hereby state that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relating one and the same person, that is me, the deponent herein.

I d e c l a r e t h a t h e r e a f t e r, I s h a l l b e k n o w n and i d e n t i f i e d o n l y b y t h e n a m e ' G. M a g e s h ' (ºÔV. \ºÔi) for all purposes.

562239

P. ELLAPPAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Magesh, son of Govindan, Indian inhabitant, aged 50 years, at present residing at the house bearing Door No. 5, Paari Street, Mullai Nagar, Packamudaiyanpet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562240 G. MAGESH.

N o l e g a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i s a c c e p t e d f o r t h e p u b l i c a t i o n o f a d v e r t i s e m e n t r e g a r d i n g c h a n g e o f n a m e s a n d o t h e r p r i v a t e n o t i f i c a t i o n s i n t h e G a z e t t e . P e r s o n s n o t i f y i n g t h e s a m e w i l l r e m a i n s o l e l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e l e g a l c o n s e q u e n c e s a n d also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

online publication at "https://styandptg.py.gov.in" Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.