Puducherry Gazette, No. 11, 14 March 2023

click here for IIIF manifest

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ ÿkπX| Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\ 2023 } \VÏfl | 14 {

No. 11 Poudouchéry Mardi 14 Mars 2023 (23 Phalguna 1944)

No. Puducherry Tuesday 14th March 2023

ÿ✓VÚ·¶¬ÔD SOMMAIRES CONTENTS

Page ✓¬ÔD Page

\க்ஷிளீக்து ழு]✓]ஙிக்ஷி_ டி|'ை©✓|ஞி .. 238 Procédure du Magistrate de District .. 238 Procedings of the District .. 238

Magistrate

மு\_னுதுளீΩறுை''^

ஸ்ரீ>க்ஷிணீ_ ழு]\[≈ழ் ஹ்ரூ©கி'^ .. 244 Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 244 Award of the Labour Court .. 244

de Tribunal.

∂டு∑ ∂ுsறுை''^ .. 249 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 249 Government Notifications .. 249 ரீ✓ழ்>க்ஷில் கீஞூளீல்∫'^ .. 251 Etablissements dangereux .. 251 Dangerous Establishments .. 251

.. 251 Announcements .. 251 ங்க்ஷிu≈ுறுை''^ .. 251 Annonces

[237]238 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [14 March 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

No. 333/DRDM/C3/PAWN/2020.

Puducherry, the 23rd February 2023.

ORDER

Sub. : DRDM – The Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966 – Public Auction – Sale of unredeemed and time barred jewels – Permission Order – Issued – Reg.

Ref. : 1. Application of Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker (L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry, dated 15-09-2022.

2. Consent letter of Thiru B. Karthikeyan, 39A/32, Srinivasan Street, Thirupathiripuliyur, Cuddalore Taluk – Authorized Auctioneer, dated 15-09-2022.

3. Report of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry vide Letter No. 6597/DC(R)N/ A5/2022/317, dated 07-02-2022.

Whereas, an application, dated 15-09-2022 was received from Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker (L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry, a licensed Pawn Broker requesting permission of the District Magistrate to sell unredeemed and time barred articles in public auction;

2. And whereas, the list of unredeemed and time barred articles submitted by the Pawn Broker was forwarded to the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, for causing physical verification of the articles and ascertain that they remain unredeemed after the time allowed for redemption;

3. And whereas, the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, has furnished the report vide reference (3) cited, stating that the Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Puducherry, had conducted physical verification of the articles that are unredeemed and time barred pledged with Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker (L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry and reported that the articles mentioned in the application remained unredeemed past the time allowed and the articles are kept in the licensed premises itself except the eighteen items vide Catalogue Nos. 28, 91, 100, 103, 136, 139, 158, 159, 176, 180, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 196, 199 and 200 of the list, which were redeemed subsequently, after the application of the Pawn Broker cited at reference (1); 4. And whereas, the rule 12 of the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Rules, 1966 prescribes detailed procedure on auctioning of pledges;

5. Now, therefore, Thiru B. Karthikeyan, Thirupathiripuliyur, Authorised Auctioneer, is permitted to conduct within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order, the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles, as shown in the list enclosed and available with the Pawn Broker, Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker (L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry, in public auction in the licensed premises of the Pawn Broker at the above address, as per the list approved and sent to the Pawn Broker and the Auctioneer, except the eighteen items vide Catalogue Nos. 28, 91, 100, 103, 136, 139, 158, 159, 176, 180, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 196, 199 and 200 of the list, which were redeemed. The Pawn Broker and Auctioneer shall observe the above formalities detailed as required under the rules framed under the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966, before conducting the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles in the public auction:

DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

Present : Tmt. V. Sofana Devi, M.L.

(G.O. Rt. No. 04/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Presiding Officer.

Puducherry, dated 05th January 2023)

Monday, the 28th day of November, 2022.

NOTIFICATION

I.D. (L) No. 30/2017

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000037-2017

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 30/2017, dated 28-11-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Puducherry, the in respect of the Dispute between the M a n a g e m e n t o f M / s PA S I C , P u d u c h e r r y a n d Thiru M. Anandan, Puducherry, over reinstatement with back wages.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with the notification issued in Labour Department's G.O.Ms.No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said Award shall be published in the Official Gazette, Puducherry.

(By order)

Thiru M. Anandan, No. 13, Illupai Thoppu Street, Veema Nagar, Thilaspet, Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director, M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation LImited (PASIC), Agro House, Thattanchavady, Puducherry.

. . Respondent

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

This Industrial dispute coming on 09-11-2022 before me for final hearing in the presence of Thiru. P. Sankaran, Counsel, for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal B. Mohandoss, P. Manivannan, Indrajith, K. Velmurugan, K. Sundarajan, P. Kalirathinam, S. Vijayasanthi, T. Vijayashanthi and K. Manopriya, Counsels, for the Respondent, and after hearing the both sides and perusing the case records, this Court delivered the following:

A W A R D

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt. No.74/AIL/LAB/T/2017, dated 02-05-2017 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner Thiru M. Anandan against the Management of M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation Limited (a Government of Puducherry undertaking), Puducherry, over reinstatement with back wages is justified or not? If justified, what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

(iii) The question of unauthorized absence does not arise since the Petitioner had informed his superior over phone about his ill-health and leave and only because he was not allowed to join duty.

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

The Petitioner had joined in service of the Respondent Corporation (PASIC) on 03-08-2007 as voucher paid and subsequently as daily rated labour from 01-07-2009 and was without any remark till he was disengaged from service on 10-05-2014 after nearly 7 years. The Petitioner was indisposed on 09-04-2014 due to fracture and was unable to move anywhere as the Doctor had advised him rest for 30 days from 09-04-2014 and issued fitness from 09-05-2014. The Petitioner has informed his superior Mr. Krishnamoorthy, Farm Supervisor, over phone about his fracture and inability to attend duty. Further, the Petitioner could not join duty as the pain continued even though fitness was given by the Doctor and he had to extend leave up to 22-05-2014.

(iv) That there was no willful unauthorized absence by the Petitioner and it happened by the circumstances beyond his control. There was Medical Certificate also for the proof of condition for the period from 09-04-2014 to 09-05-2014 and so his absence could not be treated as unauthorized absence. The Respondent failed to issue any show cause notice asking for explanation for his absence or intimation about the disengagement from service to the Petitioner except the letter consequent to the representation made the Hon'ble Prime Minister's Grievances Cell rendering the disengagement arbitrary and illegal. The Petitioner w a s f o r c e d to a p p r o a c h t h e L a b o u r O f f i c e r (Conciliation) where the Respondent has alleged other issues like nature of job, status of job and staff service rules, 1988 for which the Petitioner is in no way answerable since the only question to be considered is whether the Petitioner committed unauthorized absence or not.

(v) Respondent is supposed to conduct Domestic Enquiry under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 failure of which amounts to unfair, unjust, biased, arbitrary, unlawful against natural justice rendering the disengagement of the Petitioner to be set aside and the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement with continuity of service, back wages and all attendant benefits. The Petitioner was working nearly for the past 7 years without any remark and he is the only bread winner of his family with no other source of income for his livelihood as there is no availability of suitable alternative employment also for his survival. Therefore, the petitioner prays to direct the respondent for the reinstatement of the Petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits. Hence the Petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent as follows:

(ii) The Petitioner has sent the leave letter along with the Medical Certificate by Registered post to the Respondent Management and reported for duty on 23-05-2014. But, the Petitioner was not allowed to join duty and he was made to wait and approach different authorities including the Respondent Management. Despite his repeated approach and requests over a long period of time, he was constrained to sent representation to the Grievances Cell of the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India, New Delhi, upon which it seems that the same has been transmitted to the Respondent who in turn gave a written reply to the petitioner vide letter No. 6/1/5/4/Pasic/Esst./FTCC/ 2015-2016/8822 dated 05-02-2016 stating that the Petitioner has been disengaged from service with effect from 10-05-2014 due to unauthorized absence and then the Petitioner had been informed by the Officials of the Respondent Corporation accordingly.

The Petitioner was initially engaged as Voucher Paid with effect from 03-08-2007 and was made daily rated labour with effect from 01-07-2009. However, there was no termination of his services by the Respondent Management.

(ii) The Petitioner was only Daily Rated Casual Employee and he was engaged on day-to-day basis depending upon exigencies of work prevailing in the organization. His employment was need based one without any assurance for continuance of employment. The above casual labour were not recruited in a formal246 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [14 March 2023

4. Rejoinder petition filed by the Petitioner

against the Counter Statement:

manner in accordance with Rules and Regulations relating to appointment. Such person employed does not have right to hold the post in PASIC. His conditions of service cannot be equated to regular employees as well as permanent employees appointed in accordance with Recruitment Rules. Under such circumstances, he cannot have any grievance for his non-employment.

(iii) The Petitioner did not report to duty from 09-04-2018 onwards till 09-05-2014 without submitting leave letter or any information regarding his absence. Later, only on 21-05-2014, the Petitioner submitted leave letter on medical grounds for the above period of absence. As the non-employment of Mr. Anandan was by his own absence and as there was not termination of his services, he cannot have any grievance. The question of reinstatement does not arise since he was engaged only to do casual work on account of exigencies of work and as per PASIC Staff Service Rules, 1988 'Employee' means, a person who is in the whole time employment of the Corporation, but, does not include persons employed on daily wages.

(iv) The Petitioner has to prove the allegations in the claim petition that his absence was on medical grounds. He is also obliged to state the reason why he has not communicated to the Management for long for nearly 11/2 months up to 22-05-2014, when he states that he sustained fracture as early as on 09-04-2014 and he got fitness Certificate as early as on 09-05-2014. There is nothing on record to prove that the Petitioner has sought permission for his absent so as to make it authorized one.

The burden of proof lies on the Respondent to define the meaning of refusal of employment or non-employment or disengagement from service or abandonment of service or removal of name of the Petitioner from attendance register for anauthorized absence.

(ii) The Petitioner was only daily rated casual employee and he was engaged on day-to-day basis depending upon exigencies of work whereas, he contradict the same in which he admits the continuous engagement of the Petitioner as daily rated casual for years together which is illegal and cannot come under the definition of casual labour.

(iii) The Respondent does not disclose in what way the petitioner was disengaged or under whatever mode removed from service. In fact, the Petitioner applied for Medical leave with proper Medical Certificate, dated 21-05-2014 for which the Respondent never replied for the same and also that only after the petitioner had sent a representation to the Prime Minister's Grievances Cell vide Letter, dated 20-06-2015 received on 29-06-2015 by the PMO Grievances Cell, the Respondent has given reply, dated 05-02-2016 that is after nearly 2 years which clearly proves the Respondents attitude of ignoring law as a responsible Chief Executive of a Public Undertaking like PASIC. Hence, the Petitioner prayed to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner with back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits and costs.

5. Point for determination:

(v) The daily rated casual employees cannot claim treatment on par with regular employees. Continuous engagement of daily-rated casuals for years together cannot confer on them right to regularization so as to make them included in their cadre strength. They do not have right to hold the post and hence, cannot claim protection when their services are disengaged by their employer.

(vi) The Petitioner has stated the provisions of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 regarding conducting of Domestic Enquiry. The Respondent has not framed any charge of misconduct against the Petitioner and only for taking disciplinary action against the workmen for misconduct Domestic Enquiry is needed for imposing punishment on the charged official. That there was no punishment imposed by way of termination by the Respondent. As the non-employment of the Petitioner is not by way of termination by the Respondent by continuous absence by the petitioner, there is no question of reinstatement. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for an order of reinstatement with back wages and other reliefs as claimed in the claim petition?

5A. On Point:

Petitioner himself examined as PW1 and Ex.P1 to Ex.P9 were marked. On Respondent side, Thiru Sivashanmugam, the Managing Director of the Respondent Management, was examined as RW1 and Ex.R1 marked.

6. On the point:

This present industrial dispute is for reinstatement of the claim Petitioner Mr. M. Anandan, who was disengaged on 10-05-2014. According to the claim Petitioner, he suffered from a bone fracture on 09-04-2014 and he was under medical treatment from 09-04-2014 till 09-05-2014. He informed about his i n a b i l i t y t o a t t e n d t h e w o r k t o h i s s u p e r i o r14 March 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 247 Mr. Krishnamoorthy, Farm Supervisor. He also produced Fitness Certificate on 09-05-2014. Since, he suffered pain, he extended his leave further till 22-05-2014. He joined duty on 23-05-2014 with the Medical Leave Certificate. But the Management did not allow him to join. By way of reply to grievance petition addressed to the Hon'ble Prime Minister, Management gave a reply dated 05-02-2016 that he was disengaged from the service for the reason of his unauthorized absence. The claim Petitioner urged that it was not an unauthorized absence. He duly informed about his inability to work to his Superior. Further, it was contended that no show cause notice issued to him by the Management before his disengagement from services. No domestic enquiry under provisions of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1948 conducted. So, he approached the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Government of Puducherry. The matter failed and the failure report dated 19-02-2016 filed by the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Government of Puducherry.

7. In order to substantiate the averments contained in the claim petition, PW1 the Claim Petitioner himself deposed before this Court and Ex.P1 to Ex.P9 marked. The learned Counsel for Petitioner relied on the case law reported in CDJ 2000 SC 541. On the other hand, the R e s p o n d e n t M a n a g e m e n t h a s c o n t e n d e d t h a t disengagement of the claim Petitioner done only because of his own absence. Since, the claim Petitioner engaged by the Respondent Management only as a daily rated labour for doing causal work, no question of terminating him from the services of the Respondent Management. Consequently, there is no question of reinstatement as claimed. On the side of the Respondent Management it is strongly contended that the claim Petitioner did not inform anybody about his absence orally or in writing. Further, he submitted his leave only on 21-05-2014 on Medical grounds for his absence from 09-04-2014 to 09-05-2014. Thus, he did not intimate the Respondent Management about his leave for 1 and 1/2 months. Thus, he concluded that since he was engaged for doing casual work as daily rated labour and his initial engagement was as voucher paid worker, there is no question of Termination, conducting of Domestic Enquiry, and issuance of Show Cause notices to the petitioner for his unauthorized absence. The learned Counsel for the Respondent Management referred and relied upon the following case-laws during arguments: (i) (2016) 1 SCC (L & S) 186 Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University Vs. Akhilesh Kumar; (ii) (2019) 2 SCC(L &S) 37; (iii)(2019) 2 SCC(L &S) 98 and iv) (2011) 1 SCC(L&S) 659.

8. Heard both. On perusal of case records it could be seen from Ex.P1 that Medical Certificate, dated 09-04-2014 as well as Medical Fitness Certificate, dated 09-05-2014 issued to the Claim Petitioner are found in a single sheet. But, Medical Certificate for the leave is dated 09-04-2014 whereas, the Fitness issued by the Doctor is dated 09-05-2014. Except Ex.P1 there is no records pertaining to Medical Treatment produced by the Claim Petitioner to prove the genuinity of the reasons stated for his absence during such period. Ex.P2 is a similar Medical Certificate and Fitness Certificate in a single sheet both bear the same date 20-05- 2014. As stated above no medical records shown in this regard to support Ex.P1 and Ex.P2. Ex.P3, dated 21-05-2014, the copy of the leave letter seeking leave from 10-05-2014 to 22-05-2014. Ex.P4 is the photocopy of the acknowledgment card to prove the service of Ex.P3 on Respondent Management. Ex.P5 is the reply given by the Respondent Management to the Claim Petitioner stating the reason for his disengagement. In said Ex.P5 it is clearly mentioned that Petitioner has submitted the leave letter on Medical grounds for the period of his unauthorized absence from 09-04-2014 to 09-05-2014, only on 21-05-2014 (Ex.P3) that is after he has been disengaged from service due to unauthorized absence for a continuous period of nearly one month and due to which the works suffered due to his negligence and dereliction of duty.

9. Ex.P6, the representation given by the claim Petitioner to the Labour Officer (Conciliation), dated 19-02-2016. Ex.P7 is the reply statement dated 09-06-2016 given by the Respondent Management for Ex.P6. Ex.P8 is the Failure Report, dated 22-02-2017. Ex.P9 is the Notification of Failure report. Except this no other oral witnesses or documentary evidences filed to substantiate that the claim petitioner suffered injury and was in need of Medical rest for such period. Further, no proof produced on the side of the Claim Petitioner to show that he duly informed the Respondent Management about his absence in time. Further, there is no reason found any where in the claim petition or in the oral evidence adduced by him about the delay in producing Medical Certificate. In absence of this above evidences or proof, I find that the claim Petitioner was remained absent for a long period that is more than one month without any satisfactory reason for his absence that to without any intimation to his employer about his inability to attend the work, which amounts to unauthorized absence.

10. In Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 the Certificates said to have been issued for the period his absence, the Claim Petitioner's designation is mentioned as DRL that is Daily Rated Labour. It is also the case of the Respondent Management that he was only engaged as daily rated labourer for the day to day work basis depending upon exigencies of work prevailing in the Respondent Management. Therefore, the argument made on the side of the Respondent Management as well as RW1 evidence248 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [14 March 2023 that issuance of Show Cause notice, initiating Domestic Enquiry and issuance of Termination Order not at all required for the daily rated labourer for disengagement for his unauthorized absence, holds good and sustainable.

11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in RBI vs. S. Mani reported in (2005) 5 SCC 100 held that in law 240 days of continuous service by itself does not give right to claim permanence. Further, it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthy vs. State of Bihar reported in 1997 IV ADSC 196 that admittedly they were not appointed to the posts in accordance with the rules, but, were engaged on the basis of need of the work. They are temporary employees working on daily wages. Under these circumstances, their disengagement from service cannot be construed to be a retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act. The concept of 'retrenchment' therefore, cannot be stretched to such an extent as to cover these employees. Although by way of definition of workman u/s.2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act 'daily wage' worker also falls within the definition of workman it cannot be said that daily wages have all the rights and duties which are available to the regular employee of the Respondent Management. casual workman under Industrial Disputes Act and as such it does not create right to claim for reengagement as claimed in the petition.

14. From the above discussions that no oral witnesses p r o d u c e d n o r d o c u m e n t a r y e v i d e n c e s f i l e d t o substantiate that the claim petitioner suffered injury and was in need of Medical rest for such period. Further, no proof produced on the side of the Claim Petitioner to show that he duly informed the Respondent Management about his absence in time. Further, there is no reason found in the claim petition or in the oral evidence adduced by him about the delay in producing Medical Certificate. In absence of these above evidences or proof, I find that the claim Petitioner was remained absent for a long period that is more than one month without any satisfactory reason for his absence that to without any intimation to his employer about his inability to attend the work, which amounts to un-authorised absence. On the whole, I don't find any justification in the reference made before this Court. Thus, the point for the determination is decided as against the Claim Petitioner.

15. In the result, the reference is decided as unjustified and Industrial Dispute is dismissed. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 28th day of November, 2022.

V. SOFANA DEVI, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner's witness:

PW1 — 06-02-2019 Thiru Anandan

List of petitioner's exhibits:

12. The same view has been taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana vs. Jasmer Singh reported in (2015) 4 SCC 458 that persons who were employed on daily wages cannot be treated as on a par with persons in regular service holding similar posts. Daily rated workers are not required to possess the qualification prescribed for regular workers, nor do they have to fulfill the requirement relating to age at the time of recruitment. They are not selected in the manner in which the regular employees are selected. In other words the requirement for selection are not as rigorous. There are also provisions relating to regular service such as the liability of a member of the service to be transferred, and this being subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the authorities as prescribed, which the daily rated workmen are not subjected to. They cannot, therefore, be equated with regular workmen for the purpose for their wages. Nor can they claim the minimum of regular Pay Scale of the regularly employed.

13. In view of the decision in Magarasem vs. State of UP and others reported in 2002 (2) AWC 1712 the daily wagers engaged without any written appointment order could be terminated without any written order. Therefore, daily and casual workers who are engaged in disregard of all rules cannot be allowed to continue when there is no work and their engagement is not required. Daily wagers are deployed on temporary assignment only and not on sanctioned posts and even if, completion of 240 days work by daily wager cannot attribute status of Ex.P1 — 09-04-2014 Photocopy of the Medical & Leave Certificate and 09-05-2014 Medical Fitness Certificate of the Petitioner issued by the I.G.M.C and Research Institute, Puducherry.

Ex.P2 — 20-05-2014 Photocopy of the Medical L e a v e C e r t i f i c a t e a n d Medical Fitness Certificate of the Petitioner issued by the Rani Hospital, Puducherry.

Ex.P3 — 20-05-2014 Photocopy of the Leave

Letter of the Petitioner.

Ex.P4 — 21-05-2014 Photocopy of the Postal

Acknowledgment Card.

Ex.P5 — 05-02-2016 Photocopy of the letter given by the Respondent Management to the Petitioner.

Ex.P6 — 19-02-2016 Photocopy of the reply letter given by the Petitioner to the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P7 — 09-06-2016 Photocopy of the reply letter given by the Respondent to the Labour O f f i c e r (Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P8 — 22-02-2017 Photocopy of the Failure Report given by the Labour O f f i c e r ( C o n c i l i a t i o n ) , Puducherry.

Ex.P9 — 02-05-2017 Photocopy of the Notification of the Labour Department, Puducherry.

for effective implementation of distribution of fortified rice and scaling up of fortification of rice under Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)/Mid-Day Meals (MDM)/Public Distribution System (PDS).

1. Chief Secretary to Government . . Chairman 2. Secretary to Government (Finance) . . Member 3. Secretary to Government . . Member (Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs)

4. Secretary to Government . . Member (Health and Family Welfare)

5. Secretary to Government . . Member (School Education)

6. Secretary to Government . . Member (Women and Child Development)

7. Representative of Food Corporation . . Member List of respondent's witnesses:

RW1 — 05-07-2022 Thiru K. Sivashanmugam, Managing Director, PASIC, Puducherry.

of India (FCI) to be nominated by CMD, FCI.

The terms of reference of the Committee shall be

as under:–

List of Respondents's Exhibits:

Ex.R1 — -- Photocopy of the PASIC

(Staff Service) Rules, 1988.

V. SOFANA DEVI, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (i) To ensure coordination/monitoring with the Line Departments for effective implementation of distribution of fortified rice under ICDS/MDM/PDS.

(ii) To periodically review the progress and provide inputs/suggestions on resolving the challenges/issues that may emerge during the process of implementation of the distribution of fortified rice under ICDS/MDM/PDS.

WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

SECRETARIAT

(iii) To help in scaling up of fortification of rice under ICDS/MDM/PDS across the Union territory of Puducherry through the concerned Departments.

[G.O. Ms. No. 05/2023-WCD(SW-IV)/342,

Puducherry, dated 24th February 2023]

NOTIFICATION

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

P. MUTHU MEENA,

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to constitute a Steering Committee in the Union territory of Puducherry, comprising the following Officers,

————

Under Secretary to Government, (Women and Child Development).

கினீflமுங்த் ∂டு∑

mÁð \Vk'¶ g'EBÏ (kÚkVF) ∂KkÈÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

®ı 8809/\VƒVg/ÔVÁ´/Ê3/2023.

∂ுsறுை' [கினீflமுங்த் கீணூ \க்ஷிவிஙி s] 1975, s] 60(iii)-[ ˇணு]

கினீflமுங்த் ∂டுங்க்ஷி_ >∫'"க்ஷ்ை ய்©✓றுது ஸ்ரீங்திஙி©✓க்து ˇணு'ைக்ஷிதீஞி கீணூsளீடு∫'"றுதுஙி ளதுழ்]_ >க்ஷி∫'^ ஜி| 'க்துக்ஷி\முணூக்ஷி ∂ _ ணூ னீ க்ஷ் Ω றீ றூ ை ' க்ஷி \ மு ணூ க்ஷி ள றூ © ✓ > [ யி ணூ ஞி > ∫ ' " ை க்ஷ் ளீ ஷ் ∫ ' © ✓ க் து கீ ணூ ய் © ✓ று து ரீ றுப றீ _ ' க்ஷிப © ✓ | ஞி கீ✓'>றுல் (2)ஊஸீ >க்ஷி∫'^ 'றுது∏Ω'ைக்ஷி>று> ∂ுஙிகுஞி.

ளீத்றுங் ய்©✓றுது ஸ்ரீ✓u≈ளீத்[ ஸ்ரீ✓ஙிரூ னு'டு/\ஞூ கீணூழ்][ கீணூ ய்©✓றுது டிı \uஞூஞி ஜ்'ளீத் ∂·றுளீ டிı ✓டு©✓·கு ரீறுப டிı (1)

(2)

டிı 19, sணீ]ஸிரூ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞிடிı 19, sணீ]ஸிரூ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞிடிı 19, sணீ]ஸிரூ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞிடிı 19, sணீ]ஸிரூ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞிடிı 19, sணீ]ஸிரூ ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி ˛டுக்ஷி\ஞி

(3)

(4)

(5) ஸ்ரீ.ே ரீ. ங்க்ஷி.

1 ]றூ\] ∏டுக்ஷிபக்ஷிஞி✓க்ஷி^, 68/17 0 01 49 42/91 '/ஸ்ரீ✓. ளடுக்ஷி\flங்']டு[,

ரீ>ணூக்ஷி_, ளளுளீுs©கி ˛றுது'ை©ஸ்ரீ✓u≈ 15 னுக்ஷிக்'"க்ஷ்ை^ >∫'"க்ஷ்ை ளீஷ்∫'©✓க்து ளதுழ்]றுல் ∞[ ∂டுமுங் ]றூஞி✓ டி|ழ்னீஸ்ரீை'க்ஷி^·பூைதுக்ஷினீ டி[✓>u'க்ஷில் 'க்ஷிடுப∫'று· ளளுளீரிளீணூ'ழ்]uக்ஷ்ழ் ஸ்ரீ>த்sக்ஷ்ைஞி✓Ω மு'க்|ஸ்ரீை'க்ஷி^·©✓|˛≈னீ, ளனீ ஸ்ரீ>க்ஷிதுரூ✓க்ஷி' >க்ஷி∫'^ 'றூழ்னீ ∞மு>–ஞி ஸ்ரீ>த்s'ை sறூஞி∏ல்க்ஷி_ மு\uக்ஷ்ு©∏க்து 'க்ஷிணூஸ்ரீை'|suக்ஷ்^ ˇணுறுை'ஸ்ரீஙிக்ஷி©✓tக்|^· ∂]'க்ஷித்றீதுஞி ஜ்று≈றீதுணூக்ஷிஞி.

க்ஷ்ு©∏க்து 'க்ஷிணூஸ்ரீை'|suக்ஷ்^ >க்ஷி∫'^ முனுத்முணூக்ஷி ∂_ணூனீ 'Ω>ஞி ளீக்ஷிறீணூக்ஷி'முளீக்ஷி >∫'·னீ 'றூழ்று>ழ் ஸ்ரீ>த்s'ைக்ஷிsΩ_, >∫'πதுஞி 'றூழ்னீபூை≈ ∞னீஞி ள_றுணூ டில் ை 'றூ>©✓க்| ள>uக்ஷ் மு\_ டி'> ∂ுs©கிt[ு >∫'"க்ஷ்ை ளீஷ்∫'©✓க்து கீணூ ய்©✓றுது ரீறுப டுழ்னீ ஸ்ரீங்திஙி©✓|ஞி.

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, 2023 } ∏©´kˆ | 27 {,

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

∑. ✓க்ஷிநு'டு[,∑. ✓க்ஷிநு'டு[,∑. ✓க்ஷிநு'டு[,∑. ✓க்ஷிநு'டு[,∑. ✓க்ஷிநு'டு[, னீறுப ரீக்ணிஙிரூ (ளீறூளீக்ஷிதி).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY HEALTH SECRETARIAT

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 09, Puducherry, dated 02nd March 2023)

(G.O. Ms. No. 15, Puducherry, dated 06th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n of 65 years, Dr. T. Kamini, Senior Chief Medical Officer, Government General Hospital, Mahe, is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 28-02-2023.

(By order)

A. PUNITHAMARY, Under Secretary to Government (Health).

————'

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to appoint Selvi. Sangi Pateriya, who has been allotted to the Pondicherry Civil Service by Department of Personnal and Training, Government of India on the basis of the results of Civil Services Examination, 2021, to the Grade-II of Pondicherry Civil Service, with effect from the forenoon of 23-02-2023, subject to the conditions mentioned in the Offer of Appointment letter HEALTH SECRETARIAT

No. A.19011/20/2022/DPAR/SS-I(2), dated 21-12-2022 of this Department.

(G.O. Ms. No. 10, Puducherry, dated 02nd March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, Thiru A. Rajendhran, Manufacturing Chemist, Department of Food and Drugs Testing, Puducherry, is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 28-02-2023.

(By order)

A. PUNITHAMARY, Under Secretary to Government (Health).

2. The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is also pleased to order that Selvi. Sangi Pateriya will be a probationer in the Pondicherry Civil Service (PCS) for a period of two years from the forenoon of 23-02-2023.

3. Selvi. Sangi Pateriya, PCS Probationer, shall take the Oath of Allegiance before the Deputy Secretary to Government (Establishment), Chief Secretariat, Puducherry and furnish Surety Bond in the prescribed proforma within ten days from the date of this Notification.

4. Selvi. Sangi Pateriya, PCS Probationer, is directed to report before the District Collector-cum-District Election Officer, Puducherry, for field training in Revenue Department. She shall undergo Foundation training Course in the Directorate of Training, Union Territory Civil Service (UTCS), Delhi, as and when the next batch commences for a period as may be prescribed by Union Territory Civil Service (UTCS). She shall also pass 'Tamil Course for Non-Tamil PCS Officers' conducted by the Puducherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture, Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

V. JAISANKAR, Under Secretary to Government.

YANAM MUNICIPALITY, YANAM

Yanam, the 6th March 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested for permission to enhance the power to the following industry within the Yanam Municipal limits, as detailed below.

Sl. Name and address Address of the Power No. of the applicant

(1) (2)

factory site requirement (3)

(4)

1 Sri Vatshavai Lakshmi Narasayamma, M/s. Sri Sai Srinivasa Polymers, 1642.05 H.P. D. No. 1-13-026, D. No. 5-1-066/A, 1st Cross Street, Seetharama Nagar, Gopal Nagar, Yanam. Adivipolam, Yanam.

In conformity with the rule 8 of the Puducherry Municipalities (Grant of Licences and Permissions) Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973, objections, if any, for change of power requirement of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Yanam Municipality, within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by the Yanam Municipality.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Valli, daughter of Raju and wife of Vengadesan, Indian inhabitant, aged 32 years and residing at the house bearing Door No. 169, S.S Nagar, Villianur, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. M/1990/ 00343, in the Birth Certificate of my twin daughters, by name K a r i s h k a a n d K a n i s h k a , u n d e r Registration Nos. PM/P/2010/8643 and PM/P/2010/ 8644, respectively, and in the Savings Acount Passbook of State Bank of India, Villianur Branch, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as 'Valli'.

KHANDAVILLY RAMA KRISHNA, Commissioner. In my Electoral Identity Card, under No.YIQ0025544, my name has been mentioned as 'Valli (ளீ^π)'.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 5791, my name has been mentioned as 'Valli. V (ளீ^π. ஸ்ரீளீ)'.

In my PAN Card, under No. CENPV4997N, my name has been mentioned as 'Valli.V'.

In the particulars of family members in the Family Ration Card, under No. 327676, my name has been mentioned as 'கிவீ✓ளீ^π'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereainfter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Valli (ளீ^π)' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of February 2023.

562254 V. VALLI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Gopinath, son of Govindan, Indian inhabitant, aged 32 years and residing at the house bearing Door No. B C 4, Telecom Staff Quarters, Jaya Nagar, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. 14747, my name has been mentioned as 'G. Gopinath'.

In my School Transfer Certificate under Admission No. 1140/2006-2008, my name has been mentioned as 'Gopinath. G'.

In my Elector's Photo Identity Card under No. UEB0012682 and in my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 8400, my name has been mentioned as 'Gopinath (மு'க்ஷி∏னுக்ஷிழ்)'.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 001843, my name has been mentioned as 'மு'க்ஷி∏னுக்ஷிழ்'.

I state that I have renounced Hindu religion and embraced Muslim religion, as such, in the Certificate, dated 14-08-2020, under C.No. 15/2020, my Hindu name has been mentioned as 'Gopinath' and my assumed Muslim name has been mentioned as 'Mohammed Aadil'.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 24th day of February 2023.

562255 G. GOPINATH.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Muthukumaran, son of Sagadevan, residing at No. ll, Nehru Nagar, Kumarapalayam, Vazhudavur, Puducherry-605 502, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as 'Muthukumaran (ஜ்ழ்னீக்ஷ்ை\டு[)' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 6381, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Aarimuthu @ Muthukumaran (ரீத்ஜ்ழ்னீ @ ஜ்ழ்னீக்ஷ்ை\டு[) in my Elector's Photo Identity Card No. DGL0256131, issued by the Election Commission of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'ஜ்ழ்னீக்ஷ்ை\டு[' in my Family Ration Card bearing No. 441382, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 'ரீத்ஜ்ழ்னீ' in my 8th Standard School Transfer Certificate No. 68/05, issued by the Department of School Education, Government of Tamil Nadu.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is 'ரீத்ஜ்ழ்னீ'.

That the above particulars are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of February 2023.

S. AARIMUTHU.

562256

In my Nikkah (Marriage) Certificate, dated 21-08-2020, my name has been mentioned as 'Gopinath @ Mohammed Aadil'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Mohammed Aadil (ஜ்'\னீ ரீ]_)' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mahendiran, presently third gender, previously son of Jaganathan and Vijaya, residing at No. 27 A, Five Quarters, Kann Doctor Thottam, Priyadharshini Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as '\மு'']டு[' in my Family Ration Card No. 468265, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 'Gracye (˛முடுணி)' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9012 issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Crazy (˛முடுலி)' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card No. TMC0170183, issued by the Election Commission of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Mahendiran' in my Birth Certificate, under Registration No. M/2000/15174, dated 22-11-2000, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as 'Gracye' in my PAN Card under No. DUNPG8747Q, issued by Government of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Gracye' in my Savings Account Passbook No. XXXXXX6097 of the Indian Bank, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry.

Further, I state that I transformed myself into third gender through proper surgery and assumed a feminine name 'Gracye (˛முடுணி)' as such in the Discharge Summary issued by the Kumaran's Multi- Speciality Hospital, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as 'Gracye'

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that henceforth, I shall be known and identified only by the female gender name 'Gracye (˛முடுணி)' in all my future correspondence and records etc.

That the above particulars are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of March 2023.

562258 GRACYE.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Gnanasekar, presently transgender, previously son of Dhandapani and Valarmathi, at present residing at the house bearing Door No. 103/32, Othavaadai Street, Ariyapalayam, Villianur Commune, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was born as a male, as such in my Certificate of Birth, under Registration No. PM/M/1994/002964, registered with Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry and in my Provisional National Trade Certificate, issued by Labour Department, Puducherry with Roll No. 2153/P, my name has been mentioned as 'Gnanasekar'.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under Certificate S.No. SEC 7003585, Transfer Certificate under Admission No. 7192 and in my Academic Transcript, issued by the Open University, Malaysia, under Registration No. PYI140530, my name has been mentioned as 'Gnanasekar. D'.

In my National Trade Certificate, under No. 794580, my name has been mentioned as 'D. Gnanasekar'.

In my Electoral Identity Card under No. IKU0598854, my name has been mentioned as 'Gnanasekar (னிக்ஷில்முங்'ரூ)'.

In my Passport, under No. M1063822, my surname has been mentioned as 'Dhandapani' and my given name has been mentioned as 'Gnanasekar'.

Further, I state that later, I have transformed myself into third gender through proper surgery and became a transgender, as such in the Treatment Certificate, dated 18-12-2020, issued by the Kannan Hospital, Cuddalore, my name has been mentioned as 'Ranjani'.

Accordingly, in my Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX XXXX 3478, my name has been mentioned as 'Ranjani (டுfiங்வி)'.

In the Family Ration Card, under No. 468260, my name has been mentioned as 'டுfiங்வி'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein. I state that henceforth, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Ranjani (டுfiங்வி)' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above p a r a g r a p h s i s t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h e b e s t o f my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of March 2023.

562259 D. GNANASEKAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Arul Mozhi, daughter of Durairaj and wife of Dhayalan, Indian inhabitant, aged 65 years and residing at the house bearing door No. 2, Third Cross Street, Gnanapragasam Nagar, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my previous Passport under No. R0242139, my given name has been mentioned with spelling as 'Arulmozy'.

In my present Passport under No.W9443688, my given name has been mentioned with spelling and a space in between the names as 'Arul Mozhi'.

Similarly, in the Passport of my husband by name Dhayalan under No. W0108531, my name has been mentioned with spelling and a space in between the names as 'Arul Mozhi'.

I n m y E l e c t o r 's P h o t o I d e n t i t y C a r d u n d e r No. TN/11/063/0267614 and in my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 6735, my name has been mentioned as 'Arulmozhi (∂றூ^ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ)'.

In the particulars of members in the Family Ration Card under No. 165476, my name has been mentioned as '∂றூ^ ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name with spelling and with a space in between the names as 'Arul Mozhi (∂றூ^ ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ)' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above p a r a g r a p h s i s t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h e b e s t o f my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of March 2023.

562260 D. ∂றூ^ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ∂றூ^ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ∂றூ^ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ∂றூ^ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ∂றூ^ஸ்ரீ\க்ஷிணீ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Francis Xavier Pinto son of Pinto Fernando, aged 39 years, residing at No. 25, Sivasakthi Nagar, Amaithi Nagar Extension, Thattanchavady, Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I know all the facts of my deposition well.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned as 'Francis Xavier' in my Birth Certificate, issued by the Thoothukudi Municipality vide Registration No. 911, dated 13-09-1983, in my Elector's Photo Identity Card issued by the Election Commission of India, vide No. YSW0221473 and in my Marriage Registration Certificate, issued by the Tuticorin Registration Department vide Serial No. 2883/2012/M.No.2126/2011.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned as 'Francis Xavier P' in my Marriage Extract received from St. Jude's Shrine, Tuticorin Diocese, dated 15-08-2012 and in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate, issued by Board of Higher Secondary Examination, Tamil Nadu vide Certificate S.No. HSG 00193510 and Register No. 722030, and in my Higher Secondary Course Transfer issued by the Petit Seminaire Higher Secondary School vide Serial No. 71/ 2000, Admission No. 107/98, and in my B.Tech Engineering Degree Consolidated Mark List issued by t h e P o n d i c h e r r y U n i v e r s i t y, P u d u c h e r r y v i d e No. 0004532 and in my India Driving Licence issued by the Transport Department, Puducherry vide DL No.PY-01 20040004691.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned as 'P.Francis Xavier' in my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India vide No. XXXX XXXX 1252.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned as 'Francis Xavier Pinto' in my PAN Card issued by Income-tax Department vide No. AAKPF8059L.

Further, I submit to state that my given name is mentioned as 'Francis Xavier' and surname is mentioned as 'Pinto' in my Indian Passport, issued by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai vide Passport No. V8252175.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned as '∏டுக்ஷி[ணிநு முங்sஙிரூ' in my Family Ration Card issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry, vide No. 016786.

Hence, finally, I declare that the names viz., 'Francis Xavier' 'Francis Xavier P', 'P.Francis Xavier', 'Francis Xavier Pinto' given name 'Francis Xavier' and surname 'Pinto' and '∏டுக்ஷி[ணிநு முங்sஙிரூ' are denoting one and the same, they representing myself only. My correct name is 'Francis Xavier Pinto' only.

Henceforth, I would be called, signed and known only as Francis Xavier Pinto.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of March 2023.

562261 FRANCIS XAVIER PINTO.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, D Pascalraj, son of Durai, residing at No. 8, First Cross Street, Gnanathiyagu Nagar, Thattanchavady, Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as 'Pascalraj (✓க்ஷிநு'_டுக்ஷியூ)' in my Family Ration Card under No. 304307, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

T h a t m y n a m e i s m e n t i o n e d a s ' D P a s c a l r a j ( னீ ✓ க்ஷி நு ' _ டு க்ஷி யூ ) ' i n m y A a d h a a r C a r d u n d e r No. XXXX XXXX 8853, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Baskalraj (✓க்ஷிநு'_டுக்ஷியூ)' in my Electoral Identity Card No. JTP0399634, issued by the Election Commission of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Pascalraj' in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. OM/O/ 1983/1639, dated 01-08-1983, issued by Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 'D Pascalraj' in my PAN Card No. GBCPD4590M, issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of India.

That my name is mentioned as 'Baskalraj' in my Savings Account Passbook No. XXXXXXXXXX6494 issued by the AXIS Bank, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 'D. Pascal Raj' in my School Transfer Certificate S.No.1388, Admn. No. 6039, Mark Certificate No.1443092, issued by St. Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Thirupathiripuliyur, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu-607 002.

That my name is mentioned as 'Pascal Raj D' in my 10th Standard Mark Sheet, S.No.1443092, Register No. 459215, TMR Code No. A433393, dated 18-06-2001, issued by the Department of Government Examinations, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as 'Pascalraj' in my Marriage Certificate, S.M.No.210521406, dated 06-10-2021, issued by the Sub-Registrar Office, Oulgaret, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 'D Pascalraj' in Court Order, C.M.P.No.176/2022, dated 19-01-2023, Judicial Department, Government of Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

Finally, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be called only by the name 'D Pascalraj (னீ ✓க்ஷிநு'_டுக்ஷியூ)' in all correspondence and records, etc., in future.

That the above particulars are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of March 2023.

562262 D PASCALRAJ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Kamalavalli, daughter of Perumal and wife of M. Prabhu, Indian inhabitant, aged 19 years and residing at the house bearing Door No. 64, M.G.R. Street, Raman Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. 352/04, my name has been mentioned as 'ஸ்ரீ✓. '\ணூளீ^π'.

In my High School Transfer Certificate under Admission No. 781, in my Diploma in Computer Engineering, Transfer Certificate under No. 516 and in the Residence Certificate, dated 15-07-2021, my name has been mentioned as 'Kamalavalli.P'.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 5128, issued by Unique Identification Authority of India, my name has been mentioned as 'Kamalavalli ('\ணூளீ^π)'.

In the Legal Heirship Certificate under No. 3297- 2014-∂7, my name has been mentioned with a space in between my name's spelling as ''\ணூ ளீ^π'.

In the particulars of famaly members in the family in the Family Ration Card under No. 223337, my name has been mentioned as ''\ணூளீ^π'.

In the Sale Deed, registered as Document No. 6958 of the year 2006, my name has been mentioned as ''\முணூநுளீத்'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Kamalavalli ('\ணூளீ^π)' for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 3rd day of March 2023.

562263 P. KAMALAVALLI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, S. Shyamsundar, son of Subramani, aged 42 years, residing at No. 0l, School Street, Madukkarai, Puducherry-605 105, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that my name is 'S. Shyamsundar' entered in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 1496, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

I state that my name 'Syam Sudar.S' is entered in my School Transfer Certificate, issued by K.G.H.S.S., Nettapakkam, Puducherry, my name 'Siamsudar' is entered in my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. NC/M/1981/17, issued by Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat, Government of Puducherry and my name 'ணிஙிக்ஷிஞி ∑>க்ஷி'ரூ' is entered in my Family Ration Card No.177385, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

I s t a t e t h a t a l l t h e a b o v e s a i d n a m e s v i z . , 'S. Shyamsundar', 'Syam Sudar.S', 'Siamsudar' and 'ணிஙிக்ஷிஞி ∑>க்ஷி'ரூ' are referring one and the same person i.e., myself only.

H e n c e f o r t h , I w i l l b e k n o w n o n l y a s 'S. Shyamsundar'.

The above deposition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed therein.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of March 2023.

562267 S. SHYAMSUNDAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mourougammalle Mars, daughter of Mourougassamy alias Rattinavelou Mars and wife of Ramasamy (late), aged about 74 years, Hindu, residing at No. 243, Kaveri Street, Ashok Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that my deceased husband's name 'டுக்ஷி\ங்க்ஷிt©∏^று·' is mentioned in his Birth Certificate issued by Vanur Sub-Registrar Office, Villupuram District, Government of Tamil Nadu vide No.145/04.

I state that my husband's name is mentioned as 'டுக்ஷி\ங்க்ஷிt ∏^று·' in his Burial Permission Slip issued by Station House Officer, Lawspet Police Station, Puducherry and in his Brought Death Certificate, his name is mentioned as 'Ramasamy' and in our Family Ration Card, my husband's name is mentioned as 'டுக்ஷி\ங்க்ஷிt'.

Further, I state that my husband's name 'Ramassamy Poulle (டுக்ஷி\ங்க்ஷிt ∏^று·)' is mentioned in his Elector's Photo Identity Card and also in my Elector's Photo Identity Card vide No. IPD 0174599.

Further, I state that my husband's name is mentioned as 'M Ramassamy Poulle (\க்ஷி டுக்ஷி\ங்க்ஷிt©∏^று·)' in his Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 6802 and in his Bank Account Passbook of UCO Bank vide Account No. XXXXXXXXXX4577, his name is mentioned as 'Ramaswamy M'.

Further, I state that is my husband's Pension Payment Order, his name is mentioned as 'M Ramasamy' vide No. 16660, issued by Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries, Puducherry.

Further, I state that in our Marriage Certificate, my husband's name is mentioned as 'Ramassamypoulle' vide No. 100/1969.

Further, I state that my sons' Birth Certificates namely, Velavane alias Batmanabane, Subramaniyan alias Rajagopalan and Rajendran, and in my daughter Calaivany's Birth Certificate, my husbands name is mentioned as 'Ramassamy Poulle'. Hence, I state and declare that the names mentioned in the abovesaid records and testimonials are referring, denoting and identifying one and the same person, that is my husband only. I state that hereafter, I shall use my husband's name only as 'M. Ramasamy'.

Further, I state that my name is mentioned as 'Mourougammalle Mars' in my Birth Certificate issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry vide Registration No. PM/P/1948/000511, Voter's Identity vide No. IPD0174722, Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 5492.

Whereas, in my Pension Book vide PPO No. 15107 issued by Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries, Puducherry, my name has been entered as 'Mourougammalle', in my Family Ration Card No. 100295, my name is mentioned as 'ஜ்றூ'ஞி\க்ஷி^' issued by Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

I do hereby declare that the abovesaid my names entered in the above records are referring, denoting and identifying one and the same person, i.e., myself only. I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'Mourougammalle'.

Also declare that the above particulars are true and correct, and nothing material has been false.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of March 2023.

562270 MOUROUGAMMALLE MARS.

N o l e g a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i s a c c e p t e d f o r t h e p u b l i c a t i o n o f a d v e r t i s e m e n t r e g a r d i n g c h a n g e o f n a m e s a n d o t h e r p r i v a t e n o t i f i c a t i o n s i n t h e G a z e t t e . P e r s o n s n o t i f y i n g t h e s a m e w i l l r e m a i n s o l e l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e l e g a l c o n s e q u e n c e s a n d also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

online publication at "https://styandptg.py.gov.in" Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.