Registered No. PY/44/2021-23 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry
∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ ÿkπX| Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\ 2023 } ∞©´_ | 25 {
No. 17 Poudouchéry Mardi 25 Avril 2023 (5 Vaisakha 1945)
No. Puducherry Tuesday 25th April 2023
ÿ✓VÚ·¶¬ÔD SOMMAIRES CONTENTS
Page ✓¬ÔD Page
ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ .. 346 Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 346 Award of the Labour Court .. 346
de Tribunal.
∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 352 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 352 Government Notifications .. 352
.. 355 Announcements .. 355 ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 355 Annonces
[345]352 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [25 April 2023 Ex.P8 — 22-12-2016 Photocopy of the reply of the p e t i t i o n er on the Respondent's r e p l y b e f o r e t h e L a b o u r O f f i c e r (Conciliation), G o v e r n m e n t o f Puducherry.
Ex.P9 — 13- 09- 2 0 1 7 P h o t o c o p y o f t h e Conciliation Failure Report.
and the Union workman Thiru R. Johnson Raj Ramesh, represented by the Union for all Staff in Vinayaka Mission's Medical College and Hospital, Karaikal, over pay anomaly, in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
List of Respondent's witness:
RW.1 —07-07-2022 Thiru S. Sasikumar, General Manager-Manufacturing Respondent Management.
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 List of Respondent's exhibits:
EX.R1 — 2 9 - 0 6 - 2 0 1 5 P h o t o c o p y o f t h e Probation Order issued to the P e t i t i o n e r b y t h e R e s p o n d e n t Management.
Ex.R2— 06-01-2016 Photocopy of the show cause notice issued t o t h e P e t i t i o n e r b y t h e R e s p o n d e n t Management.
Ex.R3— 1 2- 0 3 - 2 0 1 6 P h o t o c o p y to t h e memorandum issued to the Petitioner b y t h e R e s p o n d e n t Management.
Ex.R4— 1 5- 0 3 - 2 0 1 6 P h o t o c o p y o f t h e Termination Order issued to the P e t i t i o n e r b y t h e R e s p o n d e n t Management.
Ex.R5— 24-05-2016 Photocopy of the letter sent by the Respondent to the Petitioner intimating the credit of legal dues into the Petitioner's Bank Account.
Ex.R6— 09-04-2016 Photocopy of the file by the Respondent Management to the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Government of Puducherry.
V. SOFANA DEVI, Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.
The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(i) Whether the industrial dispute raised by the Union workman represented by Union for all Staff in Vinayaka Mission's Medical College and Hospital, Karaikal, against the Management of M/s. Vinayaka Mission's Medical College, Kottucherry (PO), Kavaikal, over pay anomaly of Thiru R. Johnson Raj Ramesh and to refix his salary on par with his juniors Thiru M.K. Dharmaraj and S. Mohan with arrears is justified or not? If justified, what relief Thiru Johnson Raj Ramesh is entitled to?
(ii) If justified, what relief Thiru R. Johnson Raj LABOUR DEPARTMENT
Ramesh is entitled to?
(iii) To compute the relief in terms of money if, (G.O. Rt. No. 46/Lab./AIL/T/2023, Puducherry, dated 28th March 2023)
NOTIFICATION
it can be so computed.
(By order) 25 April 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 353 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 49/Lab./AIL/T/2023,
Puducherry, dated 30th March 2023)
(G.O. Rt. No. 48/Lab./AIL/T/2023,
Puducherry, dated 30th March 2023)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Bahadour Security Force, Puducherry and Thiruvalargal M. Sengeni and K. Durai, over payment of pending wage increase, bonus and other benefits, in respect of the matter mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(i) Whether the dispute raised by the All India United Trade Union Centre against the management of M/s. Bahadour Security Force, Puducherry, over payment of pending wage increase, bonus and other benefits to Thiruvalargal M. Sengeni and K. Durai from the year 01-01-2006 to 21-03-2018 (12 years of service) and 01-01-2006 to 02-03-2019 (13 years of service) amounting to ` 1,20,000 and ` 1,30,000 respectively, totaling ` 2,50,000 along with 12% interest is legal and justified? If justified, give appropriate direction?
(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.
(By order)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited and Chremcrown Exports and Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited Thozhilalargal Sangam, over Charter of demands with regard to wage revision and other allied welfare measures for the period from 2019-2022 in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioners' Union Chremcrown Exports and Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited, the management of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited, Puducherry, over charter of demands with regard to wage revision and other allied welfare measures for a period of 3 years (2019-2022) to the Union members Thiruvalargal A. Subramanian and 119 others (as mentioned in the Annexure) is justified or not? If justified, to give appropriate direction?
(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed.
(By order) 354 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [25 April 2023 ANNEXURE (1) (2) Sl. No. Names (1) (2)
1 A. Subramanian 38 M. Raju
39 V. Selvamani
40 C. Vinoth
41 C. Murugan
42 S. Gandhinesan
2 E. Selvam
43 S. Sathiyamoorthy
3 S. Ramesh
44 S. Ramanadhan
4 R. Murugan
5 K. Elumalai
6 K. Kaliyamoorthy 45 M. Saranraj
46 S. Surendar
47 B. Udhayakumar
7 S. Makesh
48 K. Pachaiyappan
8 P. Sekar
9 T. Seenuvasan
10 A. Arumaiselvam 49 J. Jayakumar
50 S. Subbu
51 R. Manickaraj
11 K. Satchudhanandam 12 T. Stalin
13 V. Jayamoorthy 52 D. Vignesh
53 T. Deva
54 G. Balamurugan
14 R. Sakkaramoorthy 55 D. Tamilarasan 15 S.K. Manikandan 16 D. Pachamuthu 56 R. Jaganraj
57 A. Arumugam
17 S. Radhakrishnan 18 E. Arumugam
19 P. Jayamoorthy 20 J. Ramkumar
58 G. Pazhaniraj
59 S. Natarajan
60 K. Honestraj
61 V. Thamizhmani
21 D. Balasundaram 22 A. Rajendran
23 S. Siva
24 K. Murugan
62 S. Kavitha
63 K. Geetha
64 V. Sathiya
65 M. Mahadevi
25 K. Muthu
26 N. Murali
27 S. Santhaseelan 28 D. Dhanasekar
29 E. Manikandan
66 M. Geetha
67 D. Ramila
68 S. Geetha
69 G. Sridaran
70 B. Arulmurugan
30 V. Sakthivel
71 T.K. Manikandan
31 S. Ilango
72 A. Parasuraman
32 S. Prabhu
73 P.M. Pushpavel
33 B.S. Ramesh
74 S. Kamalakannan
34 A. Mohan
75 M. Mathanraj
35 K. Pugazhendi
76 M. Poovarasan
36 R. Iyyappandas 37 M.V. Vatchiravel 77 C. Sasikumar25 April 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 355 AFFIDAVIT (1) (2) 78 P. Veerachandarn 79 S. Boobalan
80 P. Muthu
81 M. Mathiyazhagan 82 E. Murugan
83 E. Saranraj
84 M. Purushothaman 85 A. Thamizharasan 86 K. Arulkumar
87 R. Murugan
88 M. Arun
89 K. Kalaiyarasan 90 V. Sathiyamoorthy 91 E. Ravikumar
92 S. Raghunath 93 T. Magesh
94 K. Poiyadhu
95 G. Dhanusu
96 S. Aravindh
97 A. Alexandar
98 K. Silambarasan 99 M. Ramarajan 100 A. Ayyanar
101 V. Patrick
102 A. Paramasivam 103 V. Vijayan
104 R. Saranraj
105 V. Vijayakumar 106 K. Selvakumar 107 T. Suresh
108 N. Ponnusamy 109 V. Vetrivendan 110 M. Selvakumar 111 S. Sampathraj 112 S. Murugan
113 V. Sureshkumar 114 T. Sudharsan
115 P. Balakrishnan 116 T. Govindhan 117 M. Ajithkumar 118 V. Kasinathan 119 M. Boobalan
120 M. Sekar
I, Dhatchanamoorthi, son of Egarajan (late), aged about 28 years, residing at No. 20, Third Main Road, Gokulam Nagar, Madagadipet Post, Villianur Commune, Puducherry-605 107, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:
That I am the deponent herein and well known the facts of the affidavit.
I hereby state that according to my Birth Certificate, bearing No. M/1995/01652, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name is mentioned a s 'Dhatchanamoorthi'.
Further, I state that in my SSLC Mark List, bearing Register No. 602862, issued by State Board of School Examinations (Sec), Tamil Nadu, in my HSC Mark List, bearing Register No. 609207 issued by State Board of School Examinations (Hr. Sec.), Tamil Nadu, in my Provisional Certificate, bearing Serial No. 0501668, Consolidated Mark Sheet bearing Register No. 13213365, issued by Board of Examinations, Tamil Nadu and in my Transfer Certificate, bearing Register No. 13213365, issued by Motilal Nehru Government Polytechnic College, P u d u c h e r r y, m y n a m e i s m e n t i o n e d a s 'Dhatchanamoorthi E'.
Further, I state that in my Elector's Photo Identity C a r d No. ZFD0064899, my name is mentioned as 'Dhatchanamoorthi'.
Further, I state that in my Aadhaar Card, bearing No. xxxx xxxx 1894 issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, my name is mentioned as 'Dhatchanamoorthi'.
Further, I state that in my PAN Card No. CQXPD4016Q, issued by Income-tax Department, Government of India, my name is mentioned as 'Dhatchanamoorthi'.
Further, I state that in my Driving Licence, bearing No. PY01 20130012857 issued by Licensing Authority, Transport Department, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as 'Dhatchanamoorthi. E'.
Whereas, in my Family Ration Card vide Serial No. 348906, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as '>'EðVJÏ›]'.
Further, I state that in my Partition Deed, registered in the District Registrar Office, Puducherry vide Document No. 4998/2011, my name is mentioned as '>'EðVJÏ›]'.