Puducherry Gazette, No. 20, 16 May 2023

click here for IIIF manifest

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23 Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ ÿkπX| Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\ 2023 } º\ | 16 {

No. 20 Poudouchéry Mardi 16 Mai 2023 (26 Vaisakha 1945)

No. Puducherry Tuesday 16th May 2023

ÿ✓VÚ·¶¬ÔD SOMMAIRES CONTENTS

Page ✓¬ÔD Page

\ஏம'¶ ¿ஸ✓ஸடீஏ_ ®|¬Ô©✓|னு .. 404 Procédure du Magistrate de District .. 404 Procedings of the District .. 404

Magistrate

º\_¶மΩ¬ÁÔÔ^

ÿ,ஏய_ ¿ஸ\ஜ≈› லÏ©யுÔ^ .. 407 Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 407 Award of the Labour Court .. 407

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§ள¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 412 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 412 Government Notifications .. 412 ∂´∑ ∂§ள©யுÔ^ .. 415 Notices du Gouvernement .. 415 Government Notices .. 415

.. 416 Announcements .. 416 ƒஏர≈§¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 416 Annonces

[403]404 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 May 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

No. 4582/DRDM/C3/PAWN/2015/3238.

Puducherry, dated 18th April 2023.

ORDER

Present : E. Vallavan, I.A.S.,

District Collector-cum-District Magistrate.

Sub. : DRDM – The Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966 – Public Auction – Sale of unredeemed and time barred jewels – Permission Order – Issued – Reg.

Ref. : 1. Application of Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440), No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry-605 001, dated 18-01-2023.

2. Consent letter of Thiru B. Karthikeyan, 39A/32, Srinivasan Street, Thirupathiripuliyur, Cuddalore Taluk – Authorized Auctioneer, dated 18-01-2023.

3. Report of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry vide Letter No. 6636/DC(R)N/ A7/PB/2022/764, dated 23-03-2023.

Whereas, an application, dated 18-01-2023 was received from Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440), No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry, a licensed Pawn Broker requesting permission of the District Magistrate to sell unredeemed and time barred articles in public auction;

2. And whereas, the list of unredeemed time barred articles submitted by the Pawn Broker was forwarded to the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, for causing physical verification of the articles and ascertain that they remain unredeemed after the time allowed for redemption;

3. And whereas, the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, has furnished the report vide reference (3) cited, stating that the Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Puducherry, had conducted physical verification of the articles that are unredeemed and time barred pledged with Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440), No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry and reported that the articles mentioned in the application remained unredeemed past the time allowed and the articles are kept in the licensed premises itself except the twelve items vide Catalogue Nos. 8, 15, 17, 30, 32, 34, 61, 78, 84, 86, 102 and 106 of the list, which were redeemed subsequently, after the application of the Pawn Broker cited at reference (1);

4. And whereas, the rule 12 of the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Rules, 1966 prescribes detailed procedure on auctioning of pledges;

5. Now, therefore, Thiru B. Karthikeyan, Thirupathiripuliyur, Authorised Auctioneer, is permitted to conduct within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order, the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles, as shown in the list enclosed and available with the Pawn Broker, Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440), No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry, in public auction in the licensed premises of the Pawn Broker at the above address, as per the list approved and sent to the Pawn Broker and the Auctioneer, except the twelve items vide Catalogue Nos. 8, 15, 17, 30, 32, 34, 61, 78, 84, 86, 102 and 106 of the list, which were redeemed. The Pawn Broker and Auctioneer shall observe the above formalities detailed as required under the rules framed under the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966, before conducting the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles in the public auction:

E. VALLAVAN, I.A.S., District Collector-cum-District Magistrate.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred LABOUR DEPARTMENT

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with the notification issued in Labour Department's G.O. Ms.

(G.O. Rt. No. 53/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 25th April 2023)

NOTIFICATION

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 14/2018, dated 09-03-2023 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, P u d u c h e r r y, i n r e s p e c t o f i n d u s t r i a l d i s p u t e

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

b e t w e e n M/s. Deccan Enterprises, Puducherry and Thiru S.A. Rahamadullah, Villupuram, over non-payment of legal dues has been received;

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present : Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L., Presiding Officer.

appreciated by the Respondent Company and consequently he was promoted to the post of Final Checker and in the year 2014, he was once again promoted as Finishing In-charge.

Thursday, the 9th day of March 2023.

I.D. (T) No. 14/2018

CNR. No. PYPY06-000052-2018

S.A. Rahamadullah, No. 36/205, Singara Thoppu, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director, M/s. Deccan Enterprises, Vazhudavour Road, Kurumbapet, Puducherry.

. . Respondent This industrial dispute coming on 07-03-2023 b e f o r e m e f o r f i n a l h e a r i n g i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f Thiru T.H. Nizamudeen, Counsel for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal George K. Rajan, R. Balaji and S. Bagavathi, Counsels for the Respondent and after hearing the both sides and perusing the case records, this Court delivered the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt. No. 63/AIL/Lab./T/2018, dated 11-04-2018 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz., (a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner Thiru S.A. Rahamadullah, Villupuram against the Management of M/s. Deccan Enterprises, Puducherry, over non-payment of legal dues is justified or not? If justified, what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money, if, it can be so computed?

(ii) Though the Petitioner was promoted to the higher post, the Petitioner was not paid more salary for the works he carried on in the Respondent's company. He was paid minimum wages of ` 2,363 in the beginning and finally ` 6,183 for the post of Finishing In-charge. Inspite of his repeated demands and requests made with the Respondent Company, his request was not considered by the Respondent Company. The Petitioner has to travel in the bus from Villupuram to the Respondent Company for the work, so, he incurred ` 1,500 per month for travel expenses. Whereas, the Respondent advised the petitioner to resign himself and to rejoin in the Respondent's Company and as such the Petitioner resigned his job on 17-06-2014 believing the false assurance that was given by the Respondent Management.

(iii) Further, the Petitioner was refused to induct in his job which he was doing in the Respondent Management, whereas, the Respondent Management did not accept his demand and came forward to pay any more wages along with the perks and incentives and the Petitioner faces more loss of gratuity, balance of wages for layoff period to him after resigning his job and even the Respondent company remitted the ESI Contribution for him as assured by the Respondent Management. The Petitioner was forced to approach the Conciliation Authority to intervene in this matter and to take appropriate action against the Management of the Respondent Management so as to enable him to get gratuity amount, balance amount of layoff period, ESI benefits and all other perks which the Petitioner legally entitled to.

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

(iv) The Conciliation enquiry held on various dates and negotiations were held for an amicable solution and settlement in this matter but, there was no response on the Respondent Management. Hence, the Petitioner prays to direct the Respondent to pay the gratuity, balance of wages for layoff period to him after resignation, ESI benefits and all other legal dues and work to the Petitioner. Hence, the petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondents are as follows:

The Petitioner had joined in the Respondent's company as a Tailor in the readymade dress manufacturing Unit which is an Export Company registered before the Registrar of Companies under Factories Act. The Petitioner was appointed in the Respondent's company on 19-02-2007 as "Line Supervisor" vide his Identity Card No. 986 and the petitioner worked in the Respondent's company very sincerely and out of his hard work, the Petitioner was The Respondent Company is an export garment manufacturer. Due to global recession in the garment industry and consequently no further orders the Respondent was forced to downsize the factory and16 May 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 409 doing job work orders. The Respondent denies that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondent Company as Line Supervisor and he was joined in the factory as a Tailor and later given the post of Finishing In-charge. The Petitioner's last drawn (basic) wages was ` 3,615 and allowance (conveyance) ` 2,025 per month.

(ii) The Petitioner was in service for the period of 7 years as per the Respondent's records. Petitioner resigned his job on 16-06-2014 by submitting his resignation letter, dated 16-06-2014 voluntarily and left his work on his own volition. The Petitioner never approached the management nor submitted his present address and Bank details for settling his legal dues. Instead of approaching the Respondent Management for his legal dues, approached the Labour Officer and filed a false representation against the Respondent Management. The Petitioner was never advised to resign his job nor rejoin the work and no such assurances given by the Respondent Management. Further, the Respondent Management gives annual increments to workers based on performance and not by any assurance to worker. The Respondent Management requested the Labour Officer (Conciliation) to advice the Petitioner to accept the legal dues offered by the Respondent Management which was not accepted by the Petitioner, since the Petitioner demanded ` 50,000 and not willing to accept the legal settlement the Conciliation ends with failure and the amicable settlement could not be reached. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.

6. On the point:

The first and foremost defence taken by the Respondent Management is that the Petitioner herein was working as Finishing In-charge at the time, he was resigning his job from the Respondent Management i.e., 17-06-2014. Therefore, Petitioner who was holding the post of Finishing In-charge, which is Supervisory in nature, does not come under definition of workmen under section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947. Therefore, this industrial dispute at the threshold to be rejected on this Count.

7. On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing for Petitioner would contend that initially the Petitioner was appointed as Line Supervisor on 19-02-2007 and thereafter, got promoted to the post of Finishing In-charge with the salary of ` 6,183 per month. To substantiate his last drawn salary, the Petitioner relied upon Ex.P5 Pay details for the month May 2014. He resigned in June 2014. Further, he would rely upon details of Pay for the month of February 2011 (Ex.P3) wherein, it is mentioned as the Petitioner as Tailor; Pay details for November 2013 (Ex.P4) wherein, the Petitioner was shown as Line Supervisor. Further, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner would also rely upon Ex.P2 the Identity card issued to the Petitioner by the Respondent Management, wherein, date of his joining mentioned as 19-02-2007.

4. Additional Counter statement filed by the

Respondent Management as follows:

The Petitioner was holding the post of Finishing In-charge, which is supervisory in nature and the Petitioner has no scope to file this petition as he does not come under the scope of workman under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, prays for dismissal of this petition.

4. Point for determination:

Whether the Petitioner Employee is entitled for the reliefs as claimed in the claim petition?

5. On Point:

Petitioner, himself was examined as PW1 and Ex.P1 to P11 were marked. On Respondent side Mr. K.S. Madhusudhana Rao, Manager of the Respondent Management was examined as RW1. No exhibits were marked on the side Respondent. No written arguments were filed on either side.

8. As the category of the Petitioner is disputed, it is necessary to decide first the issue before going into the other issues. Whether the employee concerned in the proceeding is covered under the ambit of "Workman" as per provisions of I.D. Act? As per section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 when the category of the work is Supervisory in nature and the salary for the said Supervisory work is above ` 10,000 then the said person cannot be categorized under the "workmen" under the Industrial Disputes Act. Further, it is settled proposition that the nature of work should be decide whether he is placed out of the definition under section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act. The designation of an employee is not of much importance and what is important is a nature of duties being performed by the employee the determinative factor is the main duties of the employee concern and not some works incidentally done. In other words, what is, in substance, the work which employee does or what in substance, he is employed to do. Viewed from this angle, if, the main work is of manual, clerical or of technical nature, the mere fact that some supervisory or other work is also done by the employee incidentally or only a small fraction of working time is devoted to some supervisory work, the employee will come within410 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 May 2023 the purview of "workmen" as defined in section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act. Furthermore, his salary is undisputedly below ` 10,000, i.e., ` 6,183 per month. Though, the Respondent Management raised a plea that he is not a workmen as defined under section 2(s) of the Act 1947, no piece of evidence either oral or documentary in nature placed to rebutt the evidence adduced on the side of the Petitioner in this regard. It is also pertinent to mention here that Respondent Management had not raised such plea of "not a workman" initially in its counter as well as in the conciliation proceedings held. This abovesaid point of defence has been raised before this Court for the very first time by way of an additional counter.

9. On consideration of evidence placed before this Court, I find that, Management has failed to show that Finishing In-charge is work of supervisory nature. Be that as it may, the salary of the Petitioner at that time of resigning was only ` 6,183. Therefore, from all angles, I do not have any hesitation to decide this issue in favour of the Petitioner to the effect that he comes under the category of workmen as defined under section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act.

10. Next limb of the arguments placed before this Court is about layoff compensation. The case of the Respondent Management is that the Petitioner himself resigned his work from the Respondent Management on 17-03-2014 on his own volition. Resigning himself from the service does not amount to layoff by the Respondent Management. When there is no layoff, the claim of compensation for layoff also does not arise. Hence, the Respondent Management submitted that it is no way liable to pay any compensation. So, the Petitioner is not entitled for any layoff compensation as claimed in his claim petition.

11. By way reply, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner would say that only on believing the false assurances of better job offer given by the Respondent Management the Petitioner resigned his job. It is totally false to state that the Petitioner has resigned on his own volition. Therefore, it should be treated as layoff and the Petitioner is entitled for the layoff compensation as provided under section 25(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

12. Layoff refers to the removal of employees by the employer for reasons other than the employee's fault. A layoff is temporary in nature and it indicates the incapability of an employer to continue the employment of the workers for a short period. Section 2 (kkk) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 defines the term "layoff" as the inability, failure, or refusal of the employer to provide employment to a workman whose name is mentioned in the muster roll of his Industrial Establishment and who is not retrenched due to the lack of power, coal, raw materials, accumulation of stocks, break down of machinery or natural calamity for any other relevant reason.

13. As per section 25 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, the compensation accrued from the layoff provisions mentioned in the said Act shall not apply with workman himself resigned his services from the Management. Here, in the present case, the Petitioner workman himself resigned his service and the same has been admitted categorically by the workmen in various occasions. It is the bounden duty of the person to prove what he alleges/pleads before the Court. The workman, who pleads that only on the assurance given by the Respondent Management of better job, he resigned his service, has to prove the same before this Court. But, the Petitioner workman failed to prove that it was done by the Petitioner on assurance/compulsion inflicted upon by the Respondent Management. Therefore, this Court holds that once he resigned from service, the workman cannot ask for any compensation much less than lay off compensation as it did not amount to layoff.

14. The third contention made on the side of the Respondent Management is that amount of ` 23,412 towards the gratuity lying in the hands of the Respondent Management and it is ready to pay the said amount to the Petitioner workman. The said fact has been fairly conceded even during the Conciliation proceeding and the same has been mentioned and found placed in the Failure Report. For the non-disbursement of said gratuity amount till date, the reasons stated by the Respondent Management is that "the petitioner having resigned his job never approached the Management nor submitted his present address and Bank details for settling his legal dues. The Petitioner instead of approaching the Management for his legal dues, approached the Labour Office and filed a false representation against the Respondent Management".

15. Gratuity is payable to an employee on the termination of his employment after he has rendered continuous service under the conditions mentioned in section 4(1) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The term "continuous service" has been defined in section 2(c) to mean uninterrupted service and includes service which is interrupted, among others, by leave or cessation of work not due to any fault of the employee concerned. Explanation-I to this section provides that an employee, who is not in uninterrupted service for one year, shall be deemed to be in continuous service, if, he has been actually employed by an employer during16 May 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 411 the twelve months immediately preceding the year for not less than 240 days except when he is employed in a seasonal establishment. Explanation-II provides that an employee of a seasonal establishment shall be deemed to be in continuous service if, he has actually worked for not less than 75% of the number of days on which the establishment was in operation during that year.

and any other legal dues if, any lying with the Respondent Management to the Petitioner Workman by the Respondent Management with the interest at the rate of 12% from the date of due till the date of this Award and thereafter 6% from the date of Award till the date of realization. As the point with regard to layoff is decided as against the Petitioner Workmen, no layoff compensation is ordered. Thus, the point for determination is answered accordingly.

18. In the result, reference is justified and the Industrial Dispute is partly allowed to the effect that the Respondent Management is liable to pay the legal dues of ` 23,412 (Rupees twenty three thousand four hundred and twelve only) (gratuity amount) and any other legal dues if any lying with the Respondent Management to the Petitioner Workman with the interest at the rate of 12% from the date of his resignation till the date of this Award and thereafter 6% from the date of the Award till the date of realization by the Petitioner Workman. Though, no compensation is ordered as Layoff compensation, ` 5,000 is ordered to be paid by the Respondent Management to the Petitioner Workmen for the inconvenience caused due to the delay in making the arrears payment. With regard to other reliefs the Industrial Dispute is dismissed. With costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this 9th day of March, 2023.

V. SOFANA DEVI, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner's witness:

PW.1 — 06-10-2021 Thiru S.A. Rahamathullah

List of petitioner's exhibits:

Ex.P1 — 27-05-2013 Photocopy of the Aadhaar

Card of the Petitioner.

Ex.P2 — 19-02-2007 Photocopy of the Identity Card of the Petitioner issued by the Deccan Enterprises.

Ex.P3 — February Pay Bill of the Petitioner.

2011

Ex.P4 — November Pay Bill of the Petitioner.

16. On close and careful perusal of documents available in this Court, I find that the Respondent Management offered before the Labour Officer (Conciliation) to pay ` 23,412 to the Petitioner workman being payment of gratuity and other legal dues. During cross-examination PW1, the Petitioner Workman herein has admitted that he had received other dues. The Failure Report has been marked as Ex.P10. Ex.P2 is the Photocopy of Identity Card of Petitioner workman issued by the Respondent Management. In Ex.P2, the Residential address of the Petitioner Workman has been mentioned as "No. 36/25, Singarathoppu, Villupuram". From the claim statement it could be seen that the Petitioner still resides in the same address. Therefore, the contention of the Respondent Management that the address of the Petitioner Workman was not available and thus, it could not able to settle the legal dues of the Petitioner Workman is totally untenable. No steps have been shown to be taken on the side of the Respondent Management for disbursing the amount due to the Petitioner. It is contended that Management has tendered cheque to the Petitioner workman during the conciliation proceeding held before the Labour Officer (Conciliation). But, there is no such mention about the cheque in the failure report. During cross-examination also, PW1 has categorically denied the questions put by the Respondent Management Counsel in this regard. Hence, the factum that the Respondent was ready to pay the arrears amount due to the Petitioner workman remains unproved. Mere pleadings that the Management is ready to pay the arrears due to the Petitioner does not help in any way to decide in its favour. Management could have adopted any mode of payment of arrears due to the petitioner Employee such as Bank Transfer, Demand Draft or Cheque through Post. But, the Respondent Management did not avail any such mode for making payments for the reason best known to it. Withholding the arrear amount due for more than 4 years, cannot be brush aside as such. The inconvenience caused due to the non-payment of such arrear due should be compensated in terms of money.

2013

Ex.P5 — May 2014 Pay Bill of the Petitioner.

17. Admittedly, the Petitioner Workman resigned his service on 16-06-2014. Till date, his legal dues have not been paid by the Respondent Management. Considering the length of time, this Court finds that it is just and necessary to order for payment of gratuity of ` 23,412

Ex.P6 — 18-08-2015 Complaint given by the Petitioner to Labour Department.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 08/FD/F2/A2/2023-24,

Ex.P7 — 23-01-2016 Notice of Remarks to the Respondent by Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.

Puducherry, dated 28th April 2023)

Ex.P8 — 02-03-2016 Notice of Enquiry/ Conciliation sent by the Labour Officer to the Petitioner.

Ex.P9 — 17-10-2016 Notice of Enquiry/ Conciliation sent by the Labour Officer to the Petitioner.

Ex.P10 — 31-01-2018 Conciliation Failure Report by Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P11 — 11-04-2018 G.O. Rt. No. 63/AIL/Lab./T/ 2018, Gazette Notification by Labour Department, Puducherry.

NOTIFICATION

On acceptance of the notice of voluntary retirement given under rule 48 (1) (a) of Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 by Tmt. N. Vasanthi, Junior Accounts Officer, Rajiv Gandhi Government Women and Children Hospital, Puducherry, she is admitted into voluntary retirement from service with effect from the afternoon of 30-04-2023.

(By order)

RATNAGHOSH KISHOR CHAURE, Deputy Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LAW DEPARTMENT

List of respondent's witness:

(G.O. Ms. No. 14/2023-LD,

Puducherry, dated 28th April 2023)

RW1 — 20-01-2023 Thiru K.S. Madhusudhana Rao, Manager of the Respondent Management.

NOTIFICATION

List of respondent's exhibits: Nil

V. SOFANA DEVI, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to appoint the below mentioned Advocate(s) for appearance on behalf of the Government of Puducherry, before the Courts Subordinate to the Hon'ble High Court, Madras, with effect from the date of assumption of charge, temporarily until afresh selection is made. However, in respect of Thiru N. Vinayagam, his tenure shall be as per G.O. Ms. No. 27 /2022-LD, dated 14-12-2022 of the Law Department, Government of Puducherry.

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

Sl. Name of the Designation and name of the No. Advocates Court allotted (G.O. Ms. No. 127/F2/2022-23, Puducherry, dated 31st March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Tmt. R. Chitra, Joint Director of Economics and Statistics, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Puducherry, is atmitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 31-03-2023 on attaining the age of superannuation.

(By order)

K. GOVINDARAJAN, Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

(1) (2)

(3)

1 Thiru K. Ranganathan Additional Public

Prosecutor (III ADJ).

2 Thiru N. Vinayagam Additional Public Prosecutor (II ADJ)-cum-Special Public Prosecutor – NDPS Act, 1985 (III ADJ).

3 Thiru P. Kumarasan Special Public Prosecutor – POC Act, 1988 (PDJ) and SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 (II ADJ).

(1) (2)

4 Thiru A. Raju Additional Public Prosecutor

f o r A s s i s t a n t S e s s i o n s

Courts (CJM, PSJ & ASJ)-

(3) 2. The terms and conditions for the abovesaid Law Officers shall be as set out in the Puducherry Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021 notified in G.O. Ms. No. 22/2021-LD, Puducherry, dated 11th June 2021 of the Law Department, Government of Puducherry.

c u m - S p e c i a l P u b l i c

Prosecutor – Food Safety

and Standards Act, 2006

(CJM).

————

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

N. MURUGAVEL, Under Secretary to Government (Law).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), KARAIKAL

NO. 0205/DDSE/KKL/E3(Exam)/2023/01.

Karaikal, dated 02nd May 2023.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidate has lost his original HSC II Year Mark Certificate beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificate. If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate, it may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

Sl. Name of the Register No., Sl. No. of School in which No. applicant session and the Mark studied last

year Certificate

(1) (2)

(3) (4)

(5)

1 Thiru Thamizhselvan S 565377, March 2016 HSG 11266173 Government Higher Secondary School,

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY T.R.Pattinam, Karaikal.

M. RADJESVARY, Deputy Director (Secondary Education).

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (AGRICULTURE)

(G.O. Ms. No. 04/Ag, Puducherry, dated 03rd May 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause 28A of the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985, read with section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Act. No. 10 of 1955) and in pursuance of Order No S.O. 623(E), dated 08-02-2023 of the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi and notified in the Gazette No. 594, dated 08-02-2023 of the Government of India, the Lieutenant-Governor of Puducherry hereby notifies the Joint Director of Agriculture (Chemistry) as Authority for keeping the Fertilizer samples in his/her custody as drawn by Fertilizer Inspectors notified under the G.O Ms. No. 6/Ag/ 2019, dated 15th July 2019 of the Chief Secretariate (Agriculture), Puducherry and sending for second part for analysis to National Test House and Referral laboratory at Central Fertilizer Quality Control and Training Institute, Faridabad and keep the third sample for referee analysis as prescribed under this order.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

SUNDARARAJAN. P, Deputy Secretary to Government (Agriculture).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KARAIKAL

NO. 0405/CEO/KKL/E3(Exam)/2023/866.

Karaikal, dated 04th May 2023.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidate has lost his original SSLC Mark Certificate beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificate. If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate, it may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

Sl. Name of the Register No., Sl. No. of School in which studied last No. applicant session and the Mark year Certificate

(1) (2)

(3) (4)

(5)

1 Thiru Esvararaj R 522693, March 2007 4681114 Jawaharlal Nehru Government Higher Secondary

————

School, Nedungadu, Karaikal.

K. RAJASEKARAN, Chief Educational Officer.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS) GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION) (G.O. Ms. No. 16, Puducherry, dated 08th May 2023) (G.O. Ms. No. 18, Puducherry, dated 08th May 2023) NOTIFICATION

On a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , the following Associate/Assistant Professors shall retire on the afternoon of 31-05-2023.

Sl. Name, Designation No. and Institution

(1)

(2)

1. Thiru A. Balachandran,

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, Thiru S. Mahalingam, Superintending Engineer, presently holding the post of Chief Town Planner, Town and Country Planning Department (on transfer on deputation basis) is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of 31-05-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Associate Professor in Economics, Tagore Government Arts and Science College, Puducherry.

2. Dr. A. Salila,

Associate Professor in French, Tagore Government Arts and Science College, Puducherry.

3. Dr. M. Natarajan,

Under Secertary to Government (Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 26, Puducherry, dated 08th May 2023)

Assistant Professor in Sociology, Tagore Government Arts and Science College, Puducherry.

(By order)

V. SOUMYA, Under Secertary to Government (Higher and Technical Education).

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation of 65 years, Dr. K. Suseela, Senior Chief Medical Officer, Rajiv Gandhi Government Women and Children Hospital,16 May 2023] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 415 Puducherry, is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon of 30-04-2023.

(By order)

ƒஒ,ஏடீ› ,ஏ¬Ô¬ ÔË©யு ம_முÂÏ ணø ∂§¬ÁÔÁடீ "karaikal.gov.in" ®ஜ≈ மÁÈ,·›ஸமுனு ÔஏðÈஏனு.

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, ÂV^ 2023 }, º\ | 4 {.

K. CANDANE @ SIVARADJANE,

Under Secertary to Government

(Health).

Q ஏ .Q ஏ .Q ஏ .Q ஏ .Q ஏ . ¤ ஏ ஜ ƒ ஜ இ¤ ஏ ஜ ƒ ஜ இ¤ ஏ ஜ ƒ ஜ இ¤ ஏ ஜ ƒ ஜ இ¤ ஏ ஜ ƒ ஜ இ அÁð \ஏம'¶ ப'நுடீÏ(மÚமஏகு) \ரÆனு றுÈ பϘ, ∂ஸÔஏˆ.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (REVENUE) -CUM- LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

யுஅflºƒˆ ∂´∑ mÁð \Vk'¶ g'EBÏ (kÚkVF) \ரÆனு WÈ gϘ> ∂]ÔVˆ ∂KkÈÔD, ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_

KARAIKAL

No. 3974/DCR/LA/B1/2021

Karaikal, dated 4th May 2023.

®ı. 3974/அ\ஏப/றுப/2021.

∂§ள©யு

÷,™ஏ_ ÿ,ˆள©✓அ ®ஜ™ÿமஜ≈ஏ_இ 2013-பனு பı|இ றுÈனு ÁÔடீÔ©✓|›அ,_இ \Æமஏµமπ©யு \ரÆனு \ÆணΩடீ\Ïள_ ºÂˆடீ ƒˆஓ| \ரÆனு ÿமπ©✓Á¶›,ஜÁ\ உˆÁ\fl ƒ'¶னுஇ உ'∏ˆ°Ô^ (1) \ரÆனு(2) ∏ˆ° 7áஜ ✓Ωஇ யுஅflºƒˆ ∂´ƒஏ_இ ÷Õஸடீ ®ˆமஏ• பÁðடீ›ஸரÔஏ™ ∂முமÈÔனு \ரÆனு ∏´ஏÕஸடீ ®ˆமஏ• º\ÈஏıÁ\ Á\டீனு Ô'|©✓ஏ'| ∂Á≈ Ô'|ம,ரண ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_ \ஏம'¶›ஸ_ ºÔஏள_✓›அ மÚமஏகு ˛´ஏ\›ஸ_ றுÈனு ÁÔடீÔ©✓|›அம,ரÔஏÔஇ ƒஒ,ஏடீ ,ஏ¬Ô¬ ÔË©யு ணøள™´ஏ_ ƒ\Ï©∏¬Ô©✓'¶இ ,™அ ƒஒ,ஏடீ ,ஏ¬Ô¬ ÔË©யு ∂§¬ÁÔÁடீ \ஸ©¨| ÿƒகு•னு ÿ✓ஏÚ'|இ ŒÚ ∑,Õஸ´\ஏ™ ✓_மÁÔ அÁ≈ட™ˆஜ ம_முÂÏ ணø ŒஜÆ ∂Á\¬Ô©✓'¶அ.

÷Õ, ம_முÂÏ ணøஇ ƒஒ,ஏடீ ,ஏ¬Ô¬ ÔË©யு ∂§¬ÁÔடஜ *அ^· ,™அ ∂§¬ÁÔÔ^ \ரÆனு ✓ˆÕஅÁ´ÔÁ· ÷ÀமமுமÈÔ›ஸ_ ƒ\Ï©∏›அ^·™Ï. ∂Àம§¬ÁÔÔ^ \ரÆனு ✓ˆÕஅÁ´Ô^ ˇµ¬Ôı¶ ∂முமÈÔ∫Ôπ_ ÿ✓ஏஅ \¬Ô^ \ரÆனு றுÈ உˆÁ\டீஏ·ÏÔ^ ✓ஏÏÁம¬ÔஏÔ Áம¬Ô©✓'|^·அ. ÷Õ, ∂§ள©யு ÿமπட'¶ º,ஸடழÚÕஅ 7 Âஏ'Ô"¬ண^ ÿ ✓ ஏ அ \ ¬ Ô ^ \ ர Æ னு று È உ ˆ Á \ டீ ஏ · Ï Ô ^ ∂ÀமமுமÈÔ∫Ôπ_ ºமÁÈ Âஏ'Ôπ_ ✓ஏÏÁமட'| மÚÁÔÁடீ ✓ஸ° ÿƒகுஅÿÔஏ^·Èஏனு.

1. \ஏம'¶ ப'நுடீÏ ∂முமÈÔனுஇ

®ı 1இ ˘©·¬¸ ÿ,Úஇ ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_.

2. அÁð \ஏம'¶ ப'நுடீÏ (மÚமஏகு) ∂முமÈÔனுஇ ®ı 2இ ˘©·¬¸ ÿ,Úஇ ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_.

3. ம'¶ஏ'நுடீÏ ∂முமÈÔனுஇ ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_.

4. ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_ ÂÔ´ஏ'நு ∂முமÈÔனுஇ ÔஏÁ´¬Ôஏ_.

NOTICE

It is informed that the Government of Puducherry has constituted the independent Multi-disciplinary "Expert Group" under sub-section (1) and (2) of section 7 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Resettlement Act, 2013, to evaluate the Social Impact Assessment Report submitted by the Social Impact Assessment Team in respect of Acquisition of Land at Kovilpathu Revenue Village for "Construction of GAIL Office Building-cum-Regional Gas Management Centre (RGMC) Control Room for GAIL, Karaikal".

The Expert Group has submitted their Reports/ Recommendations on the Social Impact Assessment Report. The said Reports/Recommendations are placed in the following offices for public view for 7 days from the date of this Notice. The public in general and landowners in specific may view the reports on any working day in the below mentioned offices:

1. Office of the District Collector,

No. l, Duplex Street, Karaikal.

2. Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue), No. 2, Duplex Street, Karaikal.

3. Taluk Office, Karaikal.

4. Office of the Karaikal Municipality, Karaikal.

The Expert Group's Report is also available in the website "karaikal.gov.in".

G. JOHNSON, Deputy Collector (Revenue)-cum- Land Acquisition Officer.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Thalinjin, son of Palanisamy, Indian, aged 54 years, residing at No. 03, Veeramamunivar Street, Dr. Radhakrishanan Nagar, Kathirkamam, Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I hereby state that according to my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. P/1968/0539, dated 12-12-1968 issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name has been entered as 'Talindja'.

I hereby state that according to my Secondary Leaving Certificate vide Register No 35 of 1986-1987, dated 23-09-1986, my name has been entered as 'Mudaliar Thalinjan Palanisamy'.

Further, I submit to state that in the Job Profile Record of the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, my name has been entered as 'Mudaliar Thalinjan Palanisamy'.

I hereby state that according to my Elector's Photo Identity Card issued by Election Commission of India vide No. JTP0349191, dated 18-05-2017, my name has been entered as 'Thalinjan'.

Further, I submit to state that in the Passport issued by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai, Republic of India vide No. Z4558675, dated 25-07-2018, my name has been entered as 'Thalinjan'.

Further, I submit to state that in the PAN Card issued by the Income-tax Department, my name has been entered as 'Thalinjan'.

Whereas, in my Family Ration Card issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, bearing Card No. 340000 107578, my name has been entered as 'Thalinjin' (',πfiƒஏஜ').

Whereas, in my Aadhaar Card issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, vide Card No. XXXX XXXX 4991, dated 24-09-2011, my name has been entered as 'P. Thalinjan'.

Whereas, in my Driving Licence issued by the Government of Puducherry vide No PY01 19970002216, dated 08-05-1997, my name has been entered as 'Mudaliarthalinjan'.

Whereas, in my Annual Statement of General Provident Fund Account Statement (Account No. 1819) my name has been entered as 'T P Mudaliar'.

Hence, I hereby declare that all the abovesaid names viz., 'Talindja', 'Mudaliar Thalinjan Palanisamy', 'Thalinjan', 'P. Thalinjan' (',πfiƒஏஜ'), 'Mudaliarthalinjan' and 'T P Mudaliar' are denoting one and the same person, they referring myself only.

Hereinafter, I will be called and referred only as 'Thalinjan' and I will use for my signature as by this name only that is 'Thalinjan' for all purposes in future.

The above facts are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 29th day of April 2023.

562326 THALINJAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Tangapregassam, son of Ranganadin, aged 53 years, residing at No. 19, Dr. Rozha Street, Vanarapet, Puducherry-605 001, India, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that my name is entered as 'Thangaprakash' in my Aadhaar Card bearing No. XXXX XXXX 6290, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

I state that my name is entered as 'Thangapragasam' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card, issued by the Election Commission of India, bearing No. IGW0114900.

I state that my name is entered as 'Tangapregassam' in my Birth Certificate, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, bearing Registration No. PM/P/1969/000265.

I state that my name is entered as 'Tangapregassam' in my Indian Passport, issued by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai, Republic of India, bearing No. A8168860.

I submit that the names described in the above records as 'Thangaprakash', 'Thangapragasam' and 'Tangapregassam' are referring one and the same person that is myself only.

The statements in the abovesaid paragraphs are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 02nd day of May 2023.

562327 TANGAPREGASSAM.

AFFIDAVIT

I, K Vijaya Gandhi, son of Krishnasamy, residing at No. 11, 1st Cross Street, East Gate Nagar, Nainarmandapam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

(a) That my name has been spelled in all my official records are stated here as follows:

(i) In my Birth Certificate as K Vidjeagandy vide Registration No. P/1966/00714, dated 01-10-2012, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

(ii) In my Eelctoral Identity Card as 'Vijayagandhi' vide No. CMS0317644, dated 29-05-2005, issued by the Electoral Registration Officer, Puducherry.

(iii) In my Passport as 'Vijaya Gandhi' vide Passport No. P9176510, dated 19-04-2017, issued by the Passport Office, Chennai.

(iv) In my Driving Licence as 'Vijay Gandhi K' vide DL No. PY01 20050011268, dated 19-10-2005, issued by the Transport Department, Puducherry.

( v ) I n m y PA N C a r d N o . B C R P V 1 0 1 5 J as 'K Vijaya Gandhi'.

(vi) In my Aadhaar Card as 'K Vijaya Gandhi' vide No. XXXX XXXX 4783, dated 19-03-2013.

(vii) In my Family Ration Card as '˛. ள¤குÔஏÕஸ' vide No. 340000072538.

(b) That I am producing this Affidavit for the purpose of evidence for my name.

(c) That all the names mentioned above are referring one and the same person that is myself only.

(d) That I shall at all times hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings dealings and transactions, private as well as under all occasions whatsoever be known only as 'K Vijaya Gandhi'.

(e) That what is stated above is true and correct to best of my knowledge, information and belief, and nothing material has been concealed thereon.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 04th day of May 2023.

562328 K VIJAYA GANDHI.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Rekha, wife of Kamban, aged about 40 years and residing at Door No. ASl, Janani Subiksham Apartment, Sri Sathiya Sai Nagar, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein, as a natural g u a r d i a n I s u b m i t t h e a f f i d a v i t o n b e h a l f o f my 17 years old minor daughter 'Saathvekha'.

I submit that in my minor daughter's Birth Certificate No. 468/2005/03, her name is mentioned as 'Saathvekha', dated 19-10-2005, issued by the Commissioner, Cuddalore Municipality, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu.

Further, I submit that in my minor daughter's Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 8575, her name is mentioned as 'K.R. Saathvekha', issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

Further, I submit that in my minor daughter's Passport No. P1887051, her name is mentioned as 'Saathvekha', issued by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai.

Further, I submit that in my minor daughter's Secondary School Examination 2021 Marks Statement- cum-Certificate vide Registration No. M121/56804/ 0143, dated 03-08-2021, her name is mentioned as 'K.R. Saathvekha', issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi.

Further, I submit that in my Family Ration Card No. 190543, my minor daughter's name is mentioned as 'ƒஏ›ளÔஏ', issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

Thus, all the names viz., 'Saathvekha', 'K.R. Saathvekha' and 'ƒஏ›ளÔஏ' are referring one and the same person i.e., my minor daughter only.

I hereby declare that she shall at all times hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings, dealings and transactions, private as well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign my minor daughter's name 'K.R. Saathvekha' in place and in substitution of my minor daughter's former names.

I hereby verify and confirm that what has been stated above is true to the best of my knowledge and correct and nothing material facts have concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of May 2023.

562329 H. REKHA.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Raja, son of Dandapaani, aged 40 years and residing at No.18, Pavanar Nagar, Boomianpettai, Puduherry-605 005, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that my name is entered as 'Raja' in my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, bearing No. XXXX XXXX 8324.

I state that my name is entered as 'Raja' in my Electoral Identity Card, issued by the Election Commission of India, bearing No. UEB0029710.

I state that my name is entered as 'D. ண©✓ஜ (®) ´ஏ¤ஏ' in my Marriage Invitation, dated 11-02-2008.

I state that my name is entered as 'Raja' in my daughter Supriya's Birth Certificate, issued by the Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, bearing Registration No. M2008/ 17461, dated 22-12-2008.

I state that my name is entered as 'Raja' in my daughter Podhanai Selvi's Birth Certificate, issued by the Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry, bearing Registration No. E/2014/00574, dated 05-02-2014.

I state that my name is entered as 'Kuppan' in my Birth Certificate, issued by the Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, bearing Registration No. M/1982/04466, dated 17-07-1982.

I state that my name is entered as 'Raja' in my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department, bearing No. DBSPR1213J.

I state that my name is entered as '´ஏ¤ஏ' in my Family Ration Card, bearing No. 455660, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

Hence, I submit that the names described in the above records as 'Raja', 'Kuppan', 'D. ண©✓ஜ (®) ´ஏ¤ஏ' and '´ஏ¤ஏ' are referring one and the same person i.e., they denoting myself only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is 'Raja'.

The above statements in the abovesaid paragraphs are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of May 2023.

AFFIDAVIT

I , K . M e n a k a , d a u g h t e r o f K a r m e g a m , w i f e o f R. Babu, Hindu, aged about 41 years and residing at Plot No. 9, Kamarajar Street, Pappanchavady, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'K Menaka' in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate, bearing Register No. 687116, issued by Board of Higher Secondary Examination, Tamil Nadu.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'Menaka K in my M.B. ,B.S. Degree Certificate bearing Registration No. 52001369, issued by Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'K. Menaka' in my Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) bearing Roll No. 250513, issued by Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'Menaka, Karmegam' in my Medical Registration Certificate bearing Registration No. 78658, issued by Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Chennai.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'Karmegam Menaka' in my Admission Certificate bearing Roll No. 000840, issued by Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'Karmegam Menaka' in the recommendation Letter, No. F. No. 1/ 90(31)/2006-R.I/SPC-II/R. No. 840, issued by Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi.

I submit that my name is mentioned as 'Karmegam Menaka' in the Office Memorandum, dated 28-03-2008, issued by Health Secretariat, Government of Puducherry, in the Memorandum, dated 03-04-2008. No. A. 19015/DHFWS/A2/2008/378, issued by Directorate of Health and Family Welfare Service, Government of Puducherry, in the Office Order, dated 02-01-2018, No. 9869/ RGGWCH/Estt./El/2018 issued by Rajiv Gandhi Government Women and Children Hospital, Government of Puducherry, in the Memorandum, dated 03-11 -2017, No. A. 19015/DHFWS/Estt./A2/2006/F.32/ 875, issued by Directorate of Health and Family Welfare Services, Government of Puducherry,

RAJA.

562330

Thus, all the names viz., 'K Menaka' and 'Menaka K', 'K. Menaka', 'Menaka, Karmegam' and 'Karmegam Menaka' are denoting one and the same person that is myself and no one else.

The abovesaid facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief, and information and nothing has been concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of May, 2023.

562331 K. MENAKA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, T. B h a ra t s a t y a k ri s h n a , s o n o f I . T h a n g a r a j , a g e d 1 9 y e a r s and residing at No. 12, Anna Street, D r. R a d h a k r i s h n a n N a g a r, K a d i r k a m a m P o s t , Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well know and aware of the facts of the deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as 'T. Bharat Satya Krishna' in my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. COC/2003/05/066/000726/1, issued by the Department of Public Health, Corporation of Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

I state that my name is entered as 'T. Bharatsatyakrishna' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9053, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India, in my PAN Card No. FVBPB8398P, issued by the Incom-tax Department, Government of India.

I state that my name is mentioned as 'Bharat Satya Krishna' in my Secondary School Examination Marks Statement vide Roll No.310001192005, issued by the National Institute of Open Schooling, Noida, Government of India and in my Diploma in Chemical Engg. (Sandwich) 3rd Semester Mark Statement vide Enter Registration No.21700346, issued by the Directorate of Technical Education, Government of Tamil Nadu.

I state that my name is entered as '✓ஏ´› ƒ›டீ ˛Úðைஏ' in our Family Ration Card No.114319, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names, i.e., 'T. Bharat Satya Krishna', 'T. Bharatsatyakrishna', 'Bharat Satya Krishna' and '✓ஏ´› ƒ›டீ ˛Úðைஏ' are referred, identified and relate to one and same person that is myself only. Hereinafter, I shall be k n o w n a n d i d e n t i f i e d o n l y b y t h e n a m e 'T. Bharatsatyakrishna' for all purposes.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings, dealings and transactions private as well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign my name as 'T. Bharatsatyakrishna' in place and in substitution of my former name. I hereby verify and confirm that what has been stated above is true to the best of my knowledge and correct, and nothing material facts have been concealed thereon.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of May 2023.

562332 T. BHARATSATYAKRISHNA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Manikandan, son of Velin and Vijaya, aged 27 years and residing at the house bearing Door No. 20, Velayutham Pillai Street, Muthialpet, Puducherry -605 003, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate, under Registration No. PM/M/ 1996/ 003858, In the Driving Licence of mine under No. PY01 20180003776 and in my PAN Card, under No. FBDPM5911B, my father's name has been mentioned as 'Velin'

In my Transfer Certificate, under No. 130514, my said father's name has been mentioned as 'Velan'.

In my Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX XXXX 8821, m y f a t h e r 's n a m e h a s b e e n m e n t i o n e d a s 'Velin (ºமழஜ)'.

In the Birth Certificate of my father, under Registration No. P/1962/03555, his name has been mentioned as 'Velin'.

In my father's, PAN Card under No. BRZPV1935Q, his name has been mentioned as 'Velin.R'.

In the Family Ration Card, under No. 003236, my said father's name has been mentioned as 'ºமÈஜ'.

In the Passport of mine under No. S2860280, my surname and my said father's name has been mentioned respectively, as 'Velan'.

Therefore, I do hereby state that the abovesaid names viz., 'Velin', 'ºமழஜ', 'ºமÈஜ', 'Velin.R' and 'Velan', are referred, identified and relates to one and the same person that is my father's only.

I state that what are all stated in the above p a r a g r a p h s i s t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h e b e s t o f my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of May 2023.

In my Community-cum-Residence Certificate, under Certificate No. 695, similarly, in the Residence Certificate of my daughter, by name Selvapriya, under Certificate No. P21RS58900, issued by the Taluk Office, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned with spelling as 'Iyyappan'.

MANIKANDAN.V

562334

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ayappane, son of Sinouvasane, Indian inhabitant, aged 46 years and residing at the house bearing Door No. 10, Bajanai Madam Street, Manjini Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry-605 003, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate, under Registration No. P/1977/00112, my name has been mentioned as 'Ayappane'.

I n m y E l e c t o r 's P h o t o I d e n t i t y C a r d u n d e r No. HKD0251942, my name has been mentioned as 'Ayappane (∂குடீ©✓ஜ)'.

In the particulars of members in the Family Ration Card under No. 39269, my name has been mentioned as 'குெடீ©✓ஜ'.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate to one and the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name with spelling as 'Iyyappan (குெடீ©✓ஜ)', for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above p a r a g r a p h s i s t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h e b e s t o f my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of May 2023.

562335

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 6755, m y n a m e h a s b e e n m e n t i o n e d a s ' S Ay y a p p a n (Ê டீெ©✓ஜ)'.

S. டீெ©✓ஜடீெ©✓ஜடீெ©✓ஜடீெ©✓ஜடீெ©✓ஜ.

N o l e g a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i s a c c e p t e d f o r t h e p u b l i c a t i o n o f a d v e r t i s e m e n t r e g a r d i n g c h a n g e o f n a m e s a n d o t h e r p r i v a t e n o t i f i c a t i o n s i n t h e G a z e t t e . P e r s o n s n o t i f y i n g t h e s a m e w i l l r e m a i n s o l e l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e l e g a l c o n s e q u e n c e s a n d also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

online publication at "https://styandptg.py.gov.in" Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.