Puducherry Gazette, No. 16, 16 April 2024

Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under No. 10410 Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ✓u≈ ÿkπX| Publiée par Autorité Published by Authority ®ı Amflºƒˆ ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\ 2024 } ∞©´_ | 16 {

No. 16 Poudouchéry Mardi 16 Avril 2024 (27 Chaitra 1946)

No. Puducherry Tuesday 16th April 2024

ÿ✓VÚ·¶¬ÔD SOMMAIRES CONTENTS

Page ✓¬ÔD Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ .. 298 Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 298 Award of the Labour Court .. 298

de Tribunal

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 303 Notifications du Gouvernement .. 303 Government Notifications .. 303

.. 309 Announcements .. 309 ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^ .. 309 Annonces

[297]298 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 April 2024 GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 31/AIL/Lab./T/2024,

Puducherry, dated 12th March 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D. (L) No. 28/2015, dated 20-12-2023 of the Labour Court, Puducherry, in respect of the dispute between the management of M/s. Poorvika Mobile World Limited, Puducherry and its workman Thiru N. Narayanasamy over non-employment and disablement compensation has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with the Notification issued in Labour Department's G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said Award shall be published in the Official Gazette, Puducherry.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

for the Petitioner and Thiruvalargal R. Rajaprakash and V. Veeraragavan, Counsel for the Respondent, upon hearing both sides, upon perusing the case records, after having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court passed the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference made by the Government of Puducherry, vide G.O. Rt. No. 52/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18-06-2015 of the Labour Department, Puducherry to resolve the following dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz. (a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner N. Narayanasamy against the Management of M/s. Poorvika Mobile World, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief petitioner is entitled to?

(b) Whether the claim of the petitioner for the reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him for his treatment at PIMS, since he met with an accident during the course of employment and his claim of disablement compensation as per Act is justified? If justified, what relief the petitioner is entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms of money if, it can be so computed?

2. The averments set forth in the claim petition is

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

as follows:

Present : Tmt. G.T. AMBIKA, M.L., PGDCLCF., Presiding Officer.

Wednesday, the 20th day of December, 2023

I.D. (L) No. 28/2015

CNR. No. PYPY06-000075-2015

Narayanasamy, S/o. Nagappan, No.10, Murugal Koil 2nd Street, Pudhu Nagar, Katterikuppam and Post, Mannadipet Commune, Puducherry.

. . Petitioner (i) The petitioner was working from 24-07-2010 under the respondent management, i.e., Poorvika Mobiles World Limited, at No. 181, Anna Salai, Puducherry. As per the instructions of the respondent management to have advertisement work at marakanam he along with another employee attended the company work at marakanam and after completing the work, while returning to Puducherry at Annumanthai he met with an road traffic accident during the course of employment on 16-06-2013 at about 2.00 p.m. and sustained serious spinal injury.

Versus

The Managing Director, M/s. Poorvika Mobile World Limited, No. 181, Anna Salai, Puducherry.

. . Respondent This Industrial Dispute coming on 15-11-2023 b e f o r e m e f o r f i n a l h e a r i n g i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f Thiruvalargal L. Rajendiran and R.T. Shankar, Counsel (ii) The petitioner family contacted the respondent/management and they assured to extend medical benefits and to provide employment to the petitioner and also for reimbursement of the medical expenses as there was no insurance coverage under E.S.I. Act and the petitioner was admitted at PIMS hospital for treatment. The petitioner undergone surgery as inpatient for more than 15 days and after surgery he was bedridden and took treatment as outpatient for nearly four months.

(iii) The petitioner approached the management to provide employment after the medical checkup and as t h e D o c t o r c e r t i f i e d h i m f i t t o p e r f o r m h i s d u t y. The management did not allow him to enter the mobile shop and also refused to provide employment and to refund the medical expenses. The accident occurred only during office hours and the management registered in E.S.I. only in the month of February 2014 and only in the month of February the petitioner submitted his family photo and the E.S.I. temporary identity certificate provided only on 21-03-2014.

(iv) As there was no ESI coverage at the time of accident, the petitioner had no right to claim benefit under ESI Act for medical treatment. The petitioner sustained injury only at the time of advertisement work at Marakanam. Therefore, the petitioner requested to provide employment with all legal benefits and also provide medical expenses incurred by his family members at PIMS hospital and also disabled compensation as applicable under the Act. (v) The management even though assured to provide the employment during hospitalization of the petitioner, but, refused to provide employment when he approached for employment and compensation. Therefore, he raised an Industrial Disputes before the Labour Officer conciliation, Puducherry vide representation, dated 13-03-2014 and 11-07-2014. During the course of conciliation, there is no representation from the management of Poorvika Mobiles Limited, at Puducherry. As there is no cooperation on the part of the management, the conciliation proceedings ended in failure and referred the matter to this Court.

(ii) The petitioner approached the ESI corporation with a claim of refund of expenditures, who in turn refused to entertain such claim citing that he has not approached the ESI Hospital at first instance, but, has taken complete treatment at PIMS Hospital without getting approval from ESIC. The petitioner is not in a position to file any claim petition under Motor Vehicles Act as there is no FIR. Petitioner devised a plan and opted to file such frivolous petition against the respondent.

(iii) The petitioner is employed by respondent as sales executive and it is true that he was assigned an advertisement work at Marakanam on 16-06-2013 along with two other employees namely, Thiruvalargal R. Thulasiraman and P. Vasanthakumar with a clear and categorical instruction to go by bus to Marakanam, but, the petitioner breached the very condition imposed and went in two wheeler that too in triples without wearing helmet and therefore, the petitioner himself is liable for injuries sustained to him and hence, the respondent is not liable to pay any compensation.

3. The averments set forth in the counter is as

follows:

(i) The present Industrial Dispute as well as the claim petition filed by petitioner is not maintainable under Law. From the bare perusal of claim petition, it is alleged that the respondent has not paid the ESI contribution, therefore, the petitioner was not beneffited under ESI Act. If, such the actual grievance of petitioner, he ought to have approached the ESI Corporation, Puducherry, for the alleged non-payment of contribution by respondent. On the other hand, the petitioner is also claiming compensation and disablement compensation for the alleged employment injuries sustained by him during the course of employment. If, such is the actual facts and grievance, the petitioner ought to have approached the authority appointed under ESI Act. Therefore, the present ID is not maintainable and further, this Court may conduct the preliminary enquiry on the above contentions before conducting the full trial in the above Industrial Dispute.

(iv) The petitioner is covered under the ESI Act. The ESI number was provided to him as early as from 27-04-2011, which is mentioned even in his monthly salary slip. The truth of the matter is immediately after the accident the petitioner was taken to PIMS hospital. The other two employees intimated the respondent about the accident and the Branch Manager visited the petitioner at PIMS Hospital and given a sum of ` 10,000 towards advance. The respondent is not only paying ESI contribution to its employees but also taking private insurance with New India Assurance Co. Limited. The petitioner submitted a claim of ` 15,588 to the respondent, who in turn processed his claim form with its insurance company and settled a sum of ` 8,391 from the insurance and the respondent settled ` 6,265 to the petitioner. But, with ulterior motives to extract and extort money from respondent, the petitioner now filed the present petition.

(v) The petitioner informed the respondent that he could not immediately report to duty and he requested the respondent to grant leave which was accepted and paid monthly salary to petitioner till December, 2013. The petitioner approached the respondent with a request of employment who in turn employed the petitioner on the same role which was continued for 5 days by petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner himself has claimed that he could not stand for long hours therefore, he is given up his employment with respondent. Hence, it is very clear that the respondent has not terminated the petitioner,300 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 April 2024 but, it was the petitioner who informed the respondent that he is moving from the respondent because of the reason that he could not stand f o r l o n g . T h e r e s p o n d e n t i s s t i l l w i l l i n g t o provide employment to petitioner by application of principle of "No Work No Pay". The petitioner is now working in a private company at NRS mobile, Villianur as Lava Promoters. Hence, the claim of petitioner is liable to be dismissed.

4. Points for determination:

1. Whether the accident has occurred during the course of employment and the injury sustained by the petitioner is an employment injury?

petitioner had admitted the petitioner as inpatient in the PIMS Hospital as there was no insurance coverage under ESI Act and had spent several lakhs amount for the treatment of the petitioner and later when the petitioner recovered from the accidental injuries and approached the respondent for work the respondent has refused to provide job to the petitioner and also refused to provide medical expense and further, the respondent management got registered with ESI only in the month of February, 2014 and provided ESI temporary Identity Card to the petitioner on 21-03-2014 and therefore, the respondent is liable to pay medical expense and compensation and employment to the petitioner as the respondent management had not paid the ESI subscription properly and there was no ESI coverage during the time of accident.

2. Whether the petitioner is entitled for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by the petitioner?

3. Whether the petitioner is entitled for disablement

compensation as claimed by the petitioner?

4. Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief of reinstatement with full back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits?

5. Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

over his non-employment is justified or not?

6. To what other relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

5. On the side of Petitioner, the Petitioner himself was examined as P.W.1 and Exs.P1 to P10 was marked. On the respondent side Mr. L. Ezhilarasan Branch Manager of Respondent Management was examined as R.W.1 and through him Exs.R1 to R8 were marked. Mr. Dr. G. Parabakaran was examined as RW2 and Ex.C1 was marked through him.

6. On points 1 to 6:

7. Whereas, the contention of the respondent is that it is true that the respondent had assigned an advertisement work at Marakanam on 16-06-2013 to the petitioner and other two of its employees namely, Thiruvalargal R. Thulasiraman and P. Vasanthakumar with clear instructions to go by bus, but, the petitioner had breached the said conditions and traveled in a two wheeler with the said two employees without wearing helmet and thereby the petitioner himself is liable for the injuries sustained by him and hence, the respondent is not liable to pay any compensation to the petitioner. The further contention of the respondent is that the petitioner is covered under ESI Act because the respondent is not only paying ESI subscription, but, also has taken private insurance to its employees and thereby the petitioner ought to have taken treatment at ESI hospital, but, has taken treatment at PIMS Hospital at his own risk for which the respondent is not liable to pay any medical expenses and further the respondent has paid an advance amount of ` 10,000 at PIMS Hospital and that apart when the petitioner has raised claim for ` 15,588 the insurance company has settled a sum of ` 8,391 and the respondent had paid ` 6,265 directly to the petitioner. It is the further contention of the respondent that as the petitioner could not immediately report to the duty the respondent on humanitarian ground has paid monthly salary to the petitioner till December, 2013 and later when, the petitioner approached the respondent for work the respondent had provided work to the petitioner but it was the petitioner who himself has left the job stating that he could not stand in the shop for hours, but, however still the respondent is willing to provide employment to the petitioner on the principle of "No Work No Pay".

8. In this case, the respondent admits that the respondent management has instructed the petitioner to do advertisement work at Marakanam on 16-06-2013 The contention of the petitioner is that when the petitioner was working in the respondent shop, the respondent management had instructed the petitioner to do advertisement work on 16-6-2013 in a place called Marakanam along with two other employees and thereby, the petitioner went to Marakanam along with two employees and after completion of advertisement work when the petitioner was returning to Puducherry, the petitioner had met with road accident and thereby sustained serious spinal injury and the said accident had taken place during the course of employment and when the family members of the petitioner had immediately contacted the respondent management it was assured by the respondent to extend medical benefits to the petitioner and to reimburse the medical expenses and provide employment to the petitioner. Further, the contention of the petitioner is that the father of the16 April 2024] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 301 along with its two employees, but, contends that it was the specific instruction of the respondent to the petitioner that the petitioner had to commute by bus, but, the petitioner violated the said instruction and had travelled in a two wheeler along with the two other employees without wearing helmet and thereby, it cannot be said that the petitioner has sustained employment injury. When, it is the specific contention of the respondent that the respondent had instructed the petitioner and two of its employees to commute by bus then it is for the respondent to prove the same. The respondent in this case has not examined either the other two employees who traveled with the petitioner or the concerned official who gave instruction to the petitioner. That apart the R.W.1 during his cross- e x a m i n a t i o n h a s d e p o s e d t h a t t h e r e s p o n d e n t had conducted enquiry as to why the other two employees namely, Thiruvalargal R. Thulasiraman and P. Vasanthakumar had travelled with the petitioner in a two wheeler and further, deposed that the enquiry was not conducted by issuing written notice regarding the same.

9. This Court finds that had it been true that the petitioner and other two employees were directed to commute by bus to Marakanam and the employees have breached such condition then the respondent at the earliest point of time ought to have initiated enquiry or call for explanation from the other two employees for such conduct, but, in this case no such documents has been produced to substantiate that the respondent has taken action against the employees for alleged breach of instructions. Therefore, in the said context this Court finds that the contention of the respondent that the respondent had instructed the petitioner and other two employees to commute for advertisement work at Marakanam by bus is found to be an after thought and evasive one and stands unproved.

10. As the accident has occurred during the course of employment and the injuries sustained by the petitioner is also out of and in the course of his employment this Court holds that the injury sustained by the petitioner is employment injury. Now, the next question that arises for consideration is whether the petitioner ought to have taken treatment at ESI hospital and not in a private hospital. The contention of the respondent is that the respondent had been paying ESI contribution and therefore, the petitioner ought to have taken treatment at ESI Hospital. Whereas, the contention of the petitioner is that the respondent has not paid the ESI contribution regularly and further, only in the month February, 2014 the respondent has registered with ESI Corporation and thereafter has issued ESI temporary Identity Certificate only on 21-03-2014.

11. The petitioner to substantiate the same has produced Ex.P5 ESI temporary Identity Certificate and on perusal of the same it is found that it is dated 31-03-2014. When, it is the contention of the respondent that as stated in Ex.P5 the date of registration of respondent concern with ESI Corporation was on 27-04-2011 and thereafter onwards the ESI contribution was regularly paid to ESI Corporation and as on date of accident there was the ESI benefits coverage then it is for the respondent to substantiate the same. The respondent during the cross-examination of P.W.1 has suggested that in the salary receipt issued by the respondent the ESI number details are available, the P.W.1 by way of reply has deposed that the P.W.1 was not given any salary receipt at any point of time and he was given only Ex.P5 ESI temporary Identity Certificate after completion of all treatments.

12. Thus, from the evidence of P.W.1 and Ex.P5 ESI temporary Identity Certificate it could be inferred that the case of the petitioner is that at the time of accident he was not issued any ESI Identity Card and there was no any ESI benefit coverage and further, the respondent has not issued any salary receipt with ESI details to the petitioner at any point of time. Whereas, the contention of the respondent by way of cross-examination of P.W.1 is that in the salary receipt issued to the petitioner the ESI details will be available. The respondent to substantiate that in the salary slip issued by the respondent the ESI details are available has produced Exs.R2 to R7. On perusal of Exs.R2 to R7 it is found that they are Salary receipt for the Month of May 2013 to August 2013 and, November and December 2013 and further, in the said salary receipt the ESI number is also mentioned.

13. However, this Court finds that R.W.1 during his cross-examination has deposed that the respondent while disbursing salary used to affix stamp and obtain the signature of the concerned employees in the Salary receipt but on perusal of Exs.R2 to R7 it is found that in the salary receipt there is either such stamps have been affixed or signature of the petitioner is available. The R.W1 during his cross-examination has admitted the same and has deposed that Exs.R2 to R7 were downloaded documents. This Court finds that when it is the specific contention of the respondent that the respondent used to affix stamps and obtain signature of its employees in the salary receipt then in such case the same ought to have been produced before this Court, but, the respondent on other hand has produced salary receipts which are stated to be downloaded one and thereby this Court concludes that the genuineness of Exs.R2 to R7 are doubtful and cannot be relied by this Court.

14. Therefore, this Court holds that the respondent has failed to prove that ESI contribution was regularly paid by the respondent and further, during the period of accident ESI benefits coverage was available to the petitioner. Hence, in the said context, this Court holds that the respondent cannot contend that the petitioner ought to have taken treatment at ESI Hospital and not at PIMS Hospital. Hence, as the injury sustained by the petitioner was of employment injury this Court holds that the respondent is liable to pay the medical expense and loss of income to the petitioner. The petitioner has produced Ex.P8 bills issued by PIMS. On perusal of Ex.P8 it is found that the total medical bills amount comes to ` 22,926. The R.W.1 during his re-examination has deposed that apart from ` 10,000 the respondent has reimbursed 80% of Medical bills to the petitioner through Medi Assist Company. This Court on perusal of evidence of R.W.1 finds that the petitioner has not disputed the same by way of further examination of R.W.1. Further, more the petitioner has produced Ex.P10 letter issued by PIMS Hospital to Medi Assist India certifying that at the time of accident the petitioner was not under the influence of Alcohol and to do the needful. Thus, from the evidence of P.W.1 and R.W.1 and Ex.P10 it could be inferred that the medical claim of petitioner is found to have been settled through Medi Assist India. Therefore, out of medical bills amount of ` 22,926 the respondent is found to have settled 80% of bill amount that is ` 18,340 and hence, the respondent is liable to pay balance medical bills amount of ` 4,586 to the petitioner.

15. As per Ex.P3 Discharge Summary, there is no any finding that the petitioner when brought to hospital was under the influence of alcohol and further, in Ex.P10 it is clearly stated by the PIMS Hospital that the petitioner was not under the influence of alcohol at the time of admission. Therefore, the contention of the respondent that at the time of accident the petitioner was under the influence of alcohol is found to be an after thought defence taken by the respondent. Similarly, the contention of the respondent that the petitioner had travelled in the two wheeler in triples and without wearing helmet also stands unproved by the respondent.

16. The yet another contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for loss of income from the respondent. As per the evidence of P.W.1 during cross-examination it is deposed that the respondent has paid 50% of salary to the petitioner till December, 2013. However, it is found that the petitioner has neither deposed the quantum of monthly salary nor produced any document to substantiate his monthly salary. Therefore, in the said context this Court is unable to compute and conclude any loss of income for the period from July, 2013 to December, 2013. As per Ex.C1 the percentage of disability is shown as 10%. Therefore, this Court finds that it would be appropriate to direct the respondent to pay a consolidated amount of ` 50,000 towards disability.

17. It is the case of petitioner that when he approached the respondent in the month of February, 2014, the respondent refused to give employment to the petitioner and whereas, it is the contention of the respondent that it was the petitioner who had abandoned the work stating that he was unable to stand in the shop for hours and further, the respondent is willing to provide employment to the petitioner at any time on the basis of "No work No pay" but, the respondent has not produced any document to substantiate the same. The R.W.1 also admitted that the respondent has not issued any notice to the petitioner as to why the petitioner has not reported to duty. Hence, in the said circumstances the contention of the respondent that the petitioner himself has abandoned the work stands unproved. Therefore, this Court holds that the petitioner is entitled for the relief of reinstatement with back wages.

18. Now, coming to the aspects of back wages and other attendant benefits is concerned, this Court finds that in this case the respondent has not proved that the Petitioner was gainfully employed anywhere else and earning income. However, it is found that the Petitioner was sustaining his day to day life even in this situation and the same could not be done without any income. Hence, this Court on considering the circumstances, deems fit that the Petitioner is entitled for 30% back wages with continuity of service and other attendant benefits. Thus, the points are answered accordingly.

In the result this petition is allowed by holding that the industrial dispute raised by the Petitioner as against the Respondent Management over his non-employment is justified and the Respondent Management is directed to reinstate the Petitioner into service within two months from the date of this Award and further, directed to pay 30% of back wages from January, 2014 to till the date of reinstatement with continuity of service and other attendant benefits and further, directed to pay the balance medical expense of ` 4,586 and compensation of ` 50,000 towards temporary disablement. There is no order as to costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 20th day of December, 2023.

G.T. AMBIKA, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner's witness :

PW1 — 26-04-2018 Thiru Narayanasamy

(Petitioner herein).

Ex.R5 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip of the petitioner for the month of August 2013.

List of petitioner's exhibits :

Ex.P1 — 05-12-2014 Photocopy of the Conciliation

Failure Report.

Ex.P2 — 18-06-2015 Reference of the Labour

Department, Puducherry.

Ex.P3 — 24-06-2013 Photocopy of the Discharge Summary issued by the PIMS Hospital.

Ex.P4 — 04-01-2014 Payment Voucher issued by Ex.R6 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip of the petitioner for the month of November 2013.

Ex.R7 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip of the petitioner for the month of December 2013.

Ex.R8 — 27-04-2011 Photocopy of the ESIC Employees details of the petitioner.

List of court's exhibits :

the Respondent.

Ex.P5 — 31-03-2014 Photocopy of the ESI Temporary

Identity Certificate.

Ex.P6 — 23-07-2010 Photocopy of the Appointment Letter issued by the Respondent.

Ex.P7 — — Photocopy of the PIMS

Hospital Medical Records.

Ex.P8 — — Photocopy of the PIMS

Hospital Medical Records.

Ex.P9 — — Photocopy of the Identity Card issued by the Respondent.

Ex.C1 — 11-08-2022 Disability Certificate issued by the Medical Board, I.G.G.G.H. and P.G.I., Puducherry.

G.T. AMBIKA, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY LABOUR DEPARTMENT

Ex.P10 — 21-06-2013 Photocopy of the No drunk letter issued by PIMS Hospital, Puducherry.

(G.O. Rt. No. 38/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 21st March 2024)

List of respondent's witnesses :

RW1 — 10-10-2019 Mr. Ezhilarasan, Branch Manager of the Respondent Management.

RW2 — 19-07-2023 Mr. Dr. Prabakaran, H.O.D.,

I.G.P.G.I, Puducherry.

NOTIFICATION

List of respondent's exhibits :

Ex.R1 — 10-10-2019 Photocopy of the

Authorization letter.

Ex.R2 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip of the petitioner for the month of May 2013.

Ex.R3 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip of the petitioner for the month of June 2013.

Ex.R4 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip of the petitioner for the month of July 2013.

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute has arisen between the management of M/s. Indian Red Cross Society, Health Department, Puducherry and the Mission Director, Puducherry State Health Mission, Puducherry, against the Puducherry, Karaikal and Yanam Health Departments, 108 Ambulance Service Drivers Association, Puducherry, over Regularization in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991 of the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the304 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 April 2024 Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the industrial dispute raised by the petitioners Association namely, the Puducherry, Karaikal and Yanam Health Departments, 108 Ambulance Service Driver Association, Puducherry,

————

against the management namely, Indian Red Cross Society, Health Department, Puducherry and the Mission Director, Puducherry State Health Mission, Puducherry, over Regularization of Petitioners as Drivers as detailed below:-

1. R. Prosper Roland, s/o. Roland Felix 2. S. Kannan, s/o. Seetharaman

3. R.Sivaprakasam, s/o. Renganathan 4. R.Sivakumar, s/o. Ramakrishnan

5. Muthukumaran, s/o. Chinnaiyan

are justified or not? If justified, what reliefs the Petitioners, as mentioned above, are entitled to?

(ii) To what other relief the Petitioners, as mentioned above, are entitled to?

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN, Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 439-442/DSE/HSW/EC/SSLC/2024.

Puducherry, dated 1st April 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original S.S.L.C Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec), College Road, Chennai – 600 006, for cancellation as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl. Name of the Register No., Sl. No. of School in which studied last No. applicant session and the Mark year Certificate

(1) (2)

(3) (4)

Thiru/Tmt./Selvi :

(5)

1 Mohanraj N 2951024 March 2021 20918462 Thillaiyadi Valliammai Government High School, Kathirkamam, Puducherry.

2 Sanjeevdharan B 5009157 March 2015 5305422 Kavingar Barathidasan Government High School, Kuruvinatham, Puducherry.

3 Soniya M 549501 March 2008 5813946 Immaculate Heart of Mary Girls' Higher Secondary School, Mission Street, Puducherry.

4 Divya M 3012186 March 2014 3877202 St. Joseph Government Aided High School, Muthialpet, Puducherry.

Dr. V.G. SIVAGAMI, Joint Director of School Education.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT (Magistrate Courts)

No. 433/JUD/CJM/PDY/2024.

Puducherry, dated 02nd April 2024.

NOTIFICATION

5 STC 148/2009 6 STC 156/2009 7 STC 196/2009 8 STC 175/2009 9 STC 176/2009 10 STC 182/2009 11 STC 195/2009 12 STC 153/2009

Year-2011

1 STC 134/2011 2 STC 289/2011

Year-2014

It is hereby informed that the case records mentioned in the Annexure will be destroyed after one month from the date of publication of this Notification. Hence, parties to those cases, who are willing to get any of the documents or certified copies thereof, may approach the Court within one month from the date of this publication.

K. MOHAN, Chief Judicial Magistrate.

————

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT PUDUCHERRY

List of Cases for Destruction

Sl. No. Case No.

Sl. No. Case No.

Year-1989

1 STC 37/1989

Year-2003

1 STC 15/2003 2 STC 257/2003

10 STC 83/2006 11 STC 84/2006 12 STC 85/2006 13 STC 86/2006 14 STC 87/2006 15 STC 88/2006 16 STC 90/2006

Year-2004

Year-2007

1 STC 267/2004

Year-2005

1 STC 43/2007 2 STC 82/2007 3 STC 90/2007 4 STC 178/2007

Year-2008

1 STC 53/2005 2 STC 138/2005 3 STC 206/2005 4 STC 241/2005 5 STC 265/2005 6 STC 295/2005

Year-2006

1 STC 55/2008 2 STC 66/2008 3 STC 296/2008 4 STC 117/2008 5 STC 123/2008 6 STC 179/2008 7 STC 195/2008

Year-2009

1 STC 28/2009 2 STC 92/2009 3 STC 116/2009 4 STC 138/2009

1 STC 70/2006 2 STC 72/2006 3 STC 75/2006 4 STC 76/2006 5 STC 77/2006 6 STC 79/2006 7 STC 80/2006 8 STC 81/2006 9 STC 82/2006

1 STC 1/2014 2 STC 2/2014 3 STC 3/2014 4 STC 4/2014 5 STC 5/2014 6 STC 6/2014 7 STC 7/2014 8 STC 8/2014 9 STC 9/2014 10 STC 10/2014 11 STC 11/2014 12 STC 12/2014 13 STC 14/2014 14 STC 15/2014 15 STC 17/2014 16 STC 18/2014 17 STC 19/2014 18 STC 20/2014 19 STC 21/2014 20 STC 22/2014 21 STC 23/2014 22 STC 24/2014 23 STC 25/2014 24 STC 26/2014 25 STC 27/2014 26 STC 28/2014 27 STC 29/2014 28 STC 30/2014 29 STC 31/2014 30 STC 32/2014 31 STC 33/2014 32 STC 34/2014 33 STC 35/2014 34 STC 36/2014 35 STC 37/2014 36 STC 38/2014 37 STC 39/2014 38 STC 40/2014

39 STC 41/2014 40 STC 42/2014 41 STC 43/2014 42 STC 44/2014 43 STC 45/2014 44 STC 46/2014 45 STC 47/2014 46 STC 48/2014 47 STC 49/2014 48 STC 50/2014 49 STC 51/2014 50 STC 52/2014 51 STC 53/2014 52 STC 54/2014 53 STC 55/2014 54 STC 56/2014 55 STC 57/2014 56 STC 58/2014 57 STC 59/2014 58 STC 60/2014 59 STC 61/2014 60 STC 62/2014 61 STC 64/2014 62 STC 65/2014 63 STC 66/2014 64 STC 67/2014 65 STC 68/2014 66 STC 69/2014 67 STC 70/2014 68 STC 71/2014 69 STC 73/2014 70 STC 74/2014 71 STC 75/2014 72 STC 76/2014 73 STC 77/2014 74 STC 78/2014 75 STC 79/2014 76 STC 80/2014 77 STC 81/2014 78 STC 83/2014 79 STC 84/2014 80 STC 87/2014 81 STC 88/2014 82 STC 89/2014 83 STC 90/2014 84 STC 91/2014 85 STC 92/2014 86 STC 93/2014 87 STC 94/2014 88 STC 95/2014306 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 April 2024 Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No.

Year-2015

1 STC 1/2015 2 STC 2/2015 3 STC 3/2015 4 STC 4/2015 5 STC 5/2015 6 STC 6/2015 7 STC 7/2015 8 STC 8/2015 9 STC 11/2015 10 STC 12/2015 11 STC 13/2015 12 STC 14/2015 13 STC 15/2015 14 STC 16/2015 15 STC 17/2015 16 STC 18/2015 17 STC 19/2015 18 STC 20/2015 19 STC 21/2015 20 STC 22/2015 21 STC 23/2015 22 STC 24/2015 23 STC 25/2015 24 STC 26/2015 25 STC 27/2015 26 STC 28/2015 27 STC 29/2015 28 STC 30/2015 29 STC 31/2015 30 STC 32/2015 31 STC 33/2015 32 STC 35/2015 33 STC 36/2015 34 STC 37/2015 35 STC 38/2015 36 STC 39/2015 37 STC 40/2015 38 STC 41/2015 39 STC 42/2015 40 STC 43/2015 41 STC 44/2015 42 STC 45/2015 43 STC 46/2015 44 STC 47/2015 45 STC 48/2015 46 STC 49/2015 47 STC 50/2015 48 STC 52/2015 49 STC 53/2015 50 STC 54/2015

102 STC 109/2015 103 STC 110/2015 104 STC 111/2015 105 STC 112/2015 106 STC 113/2015 107 STC 147/2015 108 STC 114/2015 109 STC 115/2015 110 STC 118/2015 111 STC 119/2015 112 STC 120/2015 113 STC 121/2015 114 STC 122/2015 115 STC 123/2015 116 STC 124/2015 117 STC 126/2015 118 STC 127/2015 119 STC 128/2015 120 STC 129/2015 121 STC 130/2015 122 STC 131/2015 123 STC 132/2015 124 STC 134/2015 125 STG 135/2015 126 STC 136/2015 127 STC 137/2015 128 STC 139/2015 129 STC 140/2015 130 STC 141/2015 131 STC 142/2015 132 STC 143/2015 133 STC 144/2015 134 STC 145/2015 135 STC 116/2015 136 STC 146/2015 137 STC 148/2015 138 STC 133/2015 139 STC 149/2015 140 STC 150/2015 141 STC 151/2015 142 STC 152/2015 143 STC 153/2015 144 STC 154/2015 145 STC 155/2015 146 STC 157/2015 147 STC 158/2015 148 STC 159/2015 149 STC 160/2015 150 STC 161/2015 151 STC 162/2015 152 STC 163/2015 89 STC 96/2014 90 STC 97/2014 91 STC 98/2014 92 STC 99/2014 93 STC 100/2014 94 STC 101/2014 95 STC 102/2014 96 STC 103/2014 97 STC 104/2014 98 STC 105/2014 99 STC 106/2014 100 STC 107/2014 101 STC 108/2014 102 STC 109/2014 103 STC 110/2014 104 STC 111/2014 105 STC 112/2014 106 STC 113/2014 107 STC 114/2014 108 STC 115/2014 109 STC 116/2014 110 STC 117/2014 111 STC 118/2014 112 STC 119/2014 113 STC 120/2014 114 STC 121/2014 115 STC 122/2014 116 STC 123/2014 117 STC 124/2014 118 STC 125/2014 119 STC 126/2014 120 STC 127/2014 121 STC 128/2014 122 STC 129/2014 123 STC 130/2014 124 STC 131/2014 125 STC 132/2014 126 STC 133/2014 127 STC 134/2014 128 STC 135/2014 129 STC 136/2014 130 STC 137/2014 131 STC 138/2014 132 STC 139/2014 133 STC 140/2014 134 STC 141/2014 135 STC 142/2014 136 STC 143/2014 137 STC 144/2014 138 STC 145/2014 139 STC 146/2014

51 STC 55/2015 52 STC 57/2015 53 STC 58/2015 54 STC 59/2015 55 STC 60/2015 56 STC 61/2015 57 STC 62/2015 58 STC 63/2015 59 STC 64/2015 60 STC 65/2015 61 STC 66/2015 62 STC 67/2015 63 STC 69/2015 64 STC 70/2015 65 STC 71/2015 66 STC 72/2015 67 STC 73/2015 68 STC 74/2015 69 STC 75/2015 70 STC 76/2015 71 STC 77/2015 72 STC 78/2015 73 STC 79/2015 74 STC 80/2015 75 STC 81/2015 76 STC 82/2015 77 STC 83/2015 78 STC 84/2015 79 STC 85/2015 80 STC 86/2015 81 STC 87/2015 82 STC 88/2015 83 STC 89/2015 84 STC 90/2015 85 STC 91/2015 86 STC 92/2015 87 STC 93/2015 88 STC 94/2015 89 STC 95/2015 90 STC 96/2015 91 STC 97/2015 92 STC 98/2015 93 STC 99/2015 94 STC 100/2015 95 STC 102/2015 96 STC 103/2015 97 STC 104/2015 98 STC 105/2015 99 STC 106/2015 100 STC 107/2015 101 STC 108/201516 April 2024] LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT 307 Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No.

Year-2016

52 STC 56/2016 53 STC 57/2016 54 STC 58/2016 55 STC 59/2016 56 STC 60/2016 57 STC 61/2016 58 STC 62/2016 59 STC 63/2016 60 STC 64/2016 61 STC 65/2016 62 STC 66/2016 63 STC 67/2016 64 STC 68/2016 65 STC 69/2016 66 STC 70/2016 67 STC 71/2016 68 STC 72/2016 69 STC 73/2016 70 STC 74/2016 71 STC 75/2016 72 STC 76/2016 73 STC 77/2016 74 STC 78/2016 75 STC 79/2016 76 STC 80/2016 77 STC 81/2016 78 STC 82/2016 79 STC 83/2016 80 STC 84/2016 81 STC 85/2016 82 STC 86/2016 83 STC 87/2016 84 STC 88/2016 85 STC 89/2016 86 STC 90/2016 87 STC 91/2016 88 STC 92/2016 89 STC 94/2016

Year-2017

65 STC 70/2017 66 STC 71/2017 67 STC 72/2017 68 STC 73/2017 69 STC 74/2017 70 STC 75/2017 71 STC 76/2017 72 STC 78/2017 73 STC 80/2017 74 STC 81/2017 75 STC 82/2017 76 STC 83/2017 77 STC 86/2017 78 STC 87/2017 79 STC 88/2017 80 STC 89/2017 81 STC 90/2017 82 STC 91/2017 83 STC 92/2017 84 STC 93/2017 85 STC 94/2017 86 STC 95/2017 87 STC 96/2017 88 STC 97/2017 89 STC 98/2017 90 STC 99/2017 91 STC 100/2017 92 STC 101/2017 93 STC 102/2017 94 STC 103/2017 95 STC 104/2017 96 STC 105/2017 97 STC 106/2017 98 STC 107/2017 99 STC 108/2017 100 STC 109/2017 101 STC 110/2017 102 STC 111/2017 103 STC 112/2017 104 STC 113/2017 105 STC 114/2017 106 STC 115/2017 107 STC 116/2017 108 STC 117/2017 109 STC 118/2017

Year-2018

1 STC 1/2017 2 STC 2/2017 3 STC 3/2017 4 STC 6/2017 5 STC 7/2017 6 STC 8/2017 7 STC 9/2017 8 STC 10/2017 9 STC 11/2017 10 STC 12/2017 11 STC 13/2017 12 STC 14/2017

13 STC 15/2017 14 STC 16/2017 15 STC 17/2017 16 STC 18/2017 17 STC 21/2017 18 STC 22/2017 19 STC 23/2017 20 STC 24/2017 21 STC 25/2017 22 STC 26/2017 23 STC 27/2017 24 STC 28/2017 25 STC 29/2017 26 STC 30/2017 27 STC 32/2017 28 STC 33/2017 29 STC 34/2017 30 STC 35/2017 31 STC 36/2017 32 STC 37/2017 33 STC 38/2017 34 STC 39/2017 35 STC 40/2017 36 STC 41/2017 37 STC 42/2017 38 STC 43/2017 39 STC 44/2017 40 STC 45/2017 41 STC 46/2017 42 STC 47/2017 43 STC 48/2017 44 STC 49/2017 45 STC 50/2017 46 STC 51/2017 47 STC 52/2017 48 STC 53/2017 49 STC 54/2017 50 STC 55/2017 51 STC 56/2017 52 STC 57/2017 53 STC 58/2017 54 STC 59/2017 55 STC 60/2017 56 STC 61/2017 57 STC 62/2017 58 STC 63/2017 59 STC 64/2017 60 STC 65/2017 61 STC 67/2017 62 STC 66/2017 63 STC 68/2017 64 STC 69/2017

1 STC 3/2018 2 STC 8/2018 3 STC 9/2018 4 STC 10/2018 5 STC 11/2018 1 STC 1/2016 2 STC 2/2016 3 STC 3/2016 4 STC 4/2016 5 STC 5/2016 6 STC 6/2016 7 STC 7/2016 8 STC 8/2016 9 STC 9/2016 10 STC 11/2016 11 STC 12/2016 12 STC 13/2016 13 STC 14/2016 14 STC 15/2016 15 STC 18/2016 16 STC 19/2016 17 STC 20/2016 18 STC 21/2016 19 STC 22/2016 20 STC 23/2016 21 STC 24/2016 22 STC 25/2016 23 STC 26/2016 24 STC 27/2016 25 STC 29/2016 26 STC 30/2016 27 STC 31/2016 28 STC 32/2016 29 STC 33/2016 30 STC 34/2016 31 STC 35/2016 32 STC 36/2016 33 STC 37/2016 34 STC 38/2016 35 STC 39/2016 36 STC 40/2016 37 STC 41/2016 38 STC 42/2016 39 STC 43/2016 40 STC 44/2016 41 STC 45/2016 42 STC 46/2016 43 STC 47/2016 44 STC 48/2016 45 STC 49/2016 46 STC 50/2016 47 STC 51/2016 48 STC 52/2016 49 STC 53/2016 50 STC 54/2016 51 STC 55/2016308 LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT [16 April 2024 Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No. Sl. No. Case No.

97 STC 124/2018 98 STC 125/2018 99 STC 127/2018 100 STC 128/2018 101 STC 129/2018 102 STC 130/2018 103 STC 132/2018 104 STC 133/2018 105 STC 135/2018 106 STC 136/2018 107 STC 137/2018 108 STC 138/2018 109 STC 141/2018 110 STC 143/2018 111 STC 144/2018 112 STC 145/2018 113 STC 146/2018 114 STC 147/2018 115 STC 148/2018 116 STC 149/2018 117 STC 150/2018 118 STC 151/2018 119 STC 152/2018 120 STC 153/2018 121 STC 154/2018 122 STC 156/2018 123 STC 157/2018 124 STC 30/2018 125 STC 42/2018 126 STC 49/2018

67 STC 88/2018 68 STC 89/2018 69 STC 90/2018 70 STC 91/2018 71 STC 92/2018 72 STC 93/2018 73 STC 98/2018 74 STC 96/2018 75 STC 99/2018 76 STC 100/2018 77 STC 101/2018 78 STC 102/2018 79 STC 103/2018 80 STC 104/2018 81 STC 105/2018 82 STC 106/2018 83 STC 107/2018 84 STC 108/2018 85 STC 109/2018 86 STC 110/2018 87 STC 111/2018 88 STC 113/2018 89 STC 114/2018 90 STC 115/2018 91 STC 116/2018 92 STC 119/2018 93 STC 120/2018 94 STC 121/2018 95 STC 122/2018 96 STC 123/2018

6 STC 12/2018 7 STC 13/2018 8 STC 15/2018 9 STC 14/2018 10 STC 16/2018 11 STC 17/2018 12 STC 18/2018 13 STC 19/2018 14 STC 20/2018 15 STC 21/2018 16 STC 22/2018 17 STC 23/2018 18 STC 24/2018 19 STC 25/2018 20 STC 26/2018 21 STC 27/2018 22 STC 28/2018 23 STC 29/2018 24 STC 32/2018 25 STC 33/2018 26 STC 34/2018 27 STC 35/2018 28 STC 36/2018 29 STC 37/2018 30 STC 39/2018 31 STC 40/2018 32 STC 41/2018 33 STC 43/2018 34 STC 45/2018 35 STC 47/2018 36 STC 48/2018

37 STC 50/2018 38 STC 51/2018 39 STC 52/2018 40 STC 53/2018 41 STC 54/2018 42 STC 55/2018 43 STC 56/2018 44 STC 57/2018 45 STC 59/2018 46 STC 60/2018 47 STC 64/2018 48 STC 66/2018 49 STC 67/2018 50 STC 68/2018 51 STC 69/2018 52 STC 70/2018 53 STC 72/2018 54 STC 73/2018 55 STC 75/2018 56 STC 76/2018 57 STC 77/2018 58 STC 78/2018 59 STC 80/2018 60 STC 81/2018 61 STC 82/2018 62 STC 83/2018 63 STC 84/2018 64 STC 85/2018 65 STC 86/2018 66 STC 87/2018

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 935-939/DSE/HSW/EC/HSC/2024.

Puducherry, dated 03rd April 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary Course Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Hr.Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006, for cancellation as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl. Name of the Register No., Sl. No. of School in which No. applicant session and the mark studied last

year certificate

(1) (2)

(3) (4)

(5)

1 Ms. Soniya M 544353 March 2010 5137624 Immaculate Heart of Mary Girls' Higher Secondary School, Mission Street, Puducherry.

(1) (2)

(3) (4)

Tmt./Selvi/Thiru :

(5)

2 Divya M 568544 March 2016 11255423 Thiruvalluvar Government Girls' Higher Secondary School, Puducherry.

3 Sharli M 5838861 May 2022 32678430 Vivekanandha Higher Secondary School, Sellaperumalpet, Puducherry.

4 Priyadharsini V 1576387 March 2018 13549635 Seventh Day Adventist Higher Secondary School, Shanmugapuram, Puducherry.

5 Bhuvaneswari J 542458 March 2013 7985856 Immaculate Heart of Mary Girls' Higher Secondary School, Mission Street, Puducherry.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY CHIEF SECRETARIAT (STATIONERY AND PRINTING)

Dr. V.G. SIVAGAMI, Joint Director of School Education.

AFFIDAVIT

(G.O. Ms. No. 19/S&P/2024,

Puducherry, dated 04th April 2024)

NOTIFICATION

The Notice of voluntary retirement given under rule 48 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 by Thiru V. Govindarajan, Private Secretary, Department of Stationery and Printing, Puducherry is accepted.

2. Accordingly, he is admitted into voluntary retirement with effect from the forenoon of 01/05/2024.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

T. S UDHAKAR, Under Secretary to Government, (Stationery and Printing).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY I, Arounadevi Soureka, daughter of Sundararajan, Hindu, aged about 31 years and residing at No.8, Fourth Cross Street, V.O.C Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry- 605 003, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well known aware of the facts of my deposition.

1. That m y name has been given in my Birth Certificate Registration No. C/1993/00033, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry as 'Arounadevi @ Soureka'.

2. That my name has been given in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 1108, issued by Unique Identification Authority of India as 'Arounadevi Soureka (∂ÚðVº>s ∑º´¬ÔV)'.

3. That my name has been recorded in the Family Ration Card bearing No. 057717, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry as '∂ÚðVº>s (®) ∑º´¬ÔV'.

PLANNING AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 01/PRD/2024,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2024)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n , Thiru N. Nagalingame Periane, Deputy Director (Planning), Central Office, Public Works Department, Puducherry is admitted into retirement from service with effect from the afternoon of 31-07-2023.

(By order)

R. SHEELA, Under Secretary to Government (Planning).

4. That in my Elector 's Photo Identity Card bearing No. IVT0030932, issued by Election Commission of India, my name is mentioned as 'Arounadevi @ Soureka (∂ÚðVº>s @ ƒº´¬ÔV)'.

5. That my name has been given in my PAN Card bearing No. BMSPA8308L, issued by Income-tax Department, Government of India as 'Arounadevi Soureka'.

6 . T h a t my name h a s b e e n r e g i s t e r e d i n my College Consolidated Grade Report vide Register No. 10T00756, issued by the Pondicherry University, Puducherry as 'Arouna Devi @ Soureka S'.

Hence, all the abovesaid names such as 'Arounadevi @ Soureka', 'Arounadevi Soureka (∂ÚðVº>s ∑º´¬ÔV)', '∂ÚðVº>s (®) ∑º´¬ÔV', 'Arounadevi @ Soureka' and 'Arouna Devi @ Soureka S' are referring one and the same person i.e., myself only.

I furnish this affirmation towards my names identity/proof and that all the names are belonging and referring one and the same person of myself only.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 27th day of March 2024.

562722 S. AROUNADEVI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Pradeepan P. son of Anandan, aged about 52 years, residing at No. XII/405, Parambath House, Koyyottutheru, Near Scholers School, Post Naluthara, Mahe, holder of Aadhaar Card No. xxxx xxxx 1398, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. That I am swearing this affidavit for and on behalf of my son P. Alan Pradeep, who is minor, aged 13 years. I am the lawful guardian of 'P. Alan Pradeep'.

2. I swear and state that my son is the holder of Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9028, his name is entered as 'P Alan Pradeep'.

3. I swear and state that in my son's Birth Certificate, issued by the Sub- Registrar of Births and Deaths, Kozhikode Corporation, Government of Kerala vide Registration No. 23837/2010, dated 19-08-2010, his name is entered as 'P. Alan Pradeep'.

4. I swear and state that my son is the holder of Bona fied Certificate, issued by the Headmaster, Kasthurba Gandhi Government High School, Palloor, Mahe, on 27/11/2023, my minor son's name is entered as 'P Alan Pradeep'.

5. I swear and state that in my Family Ration Card vide No. 6546, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Mahe, my son's name is entered as 'P. Alan Pradeep' (in Malayalam).

6. I swear and state that I intent to change my son's name as 'Alan Pradeep' Therefore, I swear this affidavit, for the knowledge of my relatives, friends, officials concerned and others that hereinafter, my son will be known only as 'Alan Pradeep' in all purposes.

All this is true.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Mahe, on this 26th day of March 2024.

562723 PRADEEPAN .P

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Iyyamperumal,son of Kaliyaperumal, Hindu, aged about 38 years, residing at No. 32, Main Road, Vizhidiur, Karaikal, Puducherry - 609 607, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. O/1985/68 and in my Electoral Identity Card vide No. CHD0173484, my name has been mentioned as 'Iyyamperumal (∂FBDÿ✓Ú\V^)'.

I state that in my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1206, my name has been mentioned as 'Iyyamperuamal K (nFBDÿ✓Ú\V^ Ô)'.

I state that in my PAN Card vide No. IDFPK2530H, my name has been mentioned as 'Iyyamperumal K'.

I state that in the Family Ration Card under No. 442527, my name has been mentioned as 'Iyyamperumal nBD ÿ✓Ú\V^'.

I state that in my College Transfer Certificate u n d e r No. 520/2004-05, my name has been mentioned as 'Iyyam Perumal K'.

I state that in my Secondary School Leaving Certificate (SSLC) Mark Sheet vide Certificates No. SEC. 2295904 and in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate (HSC) Mark Sheet v i d e Certificate No. HSG.0876221, my name has been mentioned as 'Iyyamperumal K'.

I submit that the names described in the above records, i.e., 'Iyyamperumal (∂FBDÿ✓Ú\V^)', 'Iyyamperuamal K (nFBD ÿ✓Ú\V^ Ô)', 'Iyyam Perumal K' and 'nFBD ÿ✓Ú\V^' are referring one and same person i.e., myself only.

Further, I state that now, I have changed my name as 'S.K.Arul (∂Ú^)' instead of 'Iyyamperumal (nBDÿ✓Ú\V^)' for numerological and sentimental reasons.

Therefore, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be called, known and distinguished only by the name 'S.K.Arul' for all my official and private purposes.

I state that what are all stated above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information and there is no suppression or misrepresentation of the facts.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 20th day of March 2024.

562724 K. IYYAMPERUMAL.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Victor Vimal Raj, son of Charles Durai Raj, Indian inhabitant, aged 34 years and residing at 2nd Main Road, J.V.R. Nagar, Kumarapalayam, Thethampakkam, Puducherry-605 502, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was born as a Christian, as such in my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under Certificate S.No. SEC. 1494291, in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate under Certificate S.No. HSG 2228200 and in my M.Phil. Computer Science College Transfer Certificate under Admission No. A15MPCS15, my name has been mentioned as 'Victor Vimal Raj .C'.

In my Community Certificate under C. No. 378/2003, my name has been mentioned as 's¬¶Ï s\_´VÎ' In my Marriage Register Certificate under Marriage No. 24/2016, my name has been mentioned as 'C. Victor Vimalraj'.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 8167, my name has been mentioned as 'Victor Vimal Raj (s¬¶Ï s\_ ´VÎ)'.íí

I n m y E l e c t o r 's P h o t o I d e n t i t y C a r d u n d e r No. TVC0122986, my name has been mentioned as 'Victorvimalraj (s¬¶Ïs\_´VÎ)'.

In my Family Ration Card under No. 212781, my name has been mentioned as 's¬¶Ï s\_ ´VÎ'.

Further, I state that through a ceremony conducted by Thirukailaya Parambarai, Srikandha Parambarai Vamadeva Sri Sivakkirayogigal Thirumadam/ Aadhinam, Thiruvidaimarudur Taluk, I have renounced Christian religion and embrased Hindu religion, as such in the Certificate, dated 20-03-2024, my said Christian name has been mentioned as 'C. Victor Vimal Raj (C. s¬¶Ïs\_´VÎ)' and my Hindu name has been mentioned as 'C. Vimalan (C. s\È[)' respectively.

Hence, I declare that hereafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'C Vimalan (C. s\È[)' only for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 05th day of April 2024.

562725 VICTOR VIMAL RAJ.

————

cÆ]ÿ\Va© ✓›]´DcÆ]ÿ\Va© ✓›]´DcÆ]ÿ\Va© ✓›]´DcÆ]ÿ\Va© ✓›]´DcÆ]ÿ\Va© ✓›]´D

2024ágD gı| ∞©´_ \V>D 08ágD º>] (08á04á2024), Amflºƒˆ - 605 007, >k·¬z©✓D, Èo>V ÂÔÏ, ∏·V' ®ı 37 ÿÔVı¶ ÷_È›]_ kE¬zD ƒ´kð[ ∂kÏÔπ[ \Ô[ z©AƒVt g˛B ÂV[ ®ø]¬ÿÔV|¬zD cÆ]ÿ\Va© ✓›]´D BVÿ>M_:

®[–Á¶B \ÔM[ ÿ✓B´V™m, ®™m z|D✓ cð°© ✓∫˛'| ∂'Á¶ ®ı 474279-_ 'z º>¤V' ®[ÆD, ∂kÚÁ¶B ∏≈©Afl ƒV[§>µ ✓]° ®ı PM/ P/2011/497-_ 'Dheja' ®[ÆD, ∂kÚÁ¶B g>VÏ ∂Á¶BV· ∂'Á¶ ®ı: X X X X X X X X 7074-_ 'ºÔ º>¤V' \uÆD ∂kÚÁ¶B ✓^π Study Certificate-_ 'K.Dheja' ®[ÆD z§©∏¶©✓'|^·m. º\uÔı¶ ÿ✓BÏÔ^ ∂Á™›mD ®[–Á¶B \ÔM[ ÿ✓BÏÔ^>V[ ®[ÆD, ÿkÀºkÆ Â✓ÏÔπ[ ÿ✓BÏÔ^ ÷_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÷>[ JÈD cÆ]Bπ¬˛º≈[. ÷MkÚD ÔVÈ∫Ôπ_ ®™m \Ô[ 'z.º>¤[ (K.Dhejan)' ®[º≈ ∂Áw¬Ô©✓|kVÏ.

º\u✓Ω, ÂV[ ∂π›> cÆ]ÿ\Va ƒD✓Õ>\VÔ ∞º>–D E¬Ô_Ô^ ∞u✓'¶V_ ®™m ÿƒVÕ> ÿƒÈs_ yÏ›m¬ÿÔV^ºk[ ®[ÆD, ∂´∑ ®|¬zD ƒ'¶›]'¶∫Ô"¬z¬ Ô'|©✓|ºk[ ®[ÆD ÷>[ JÈD cÆ]Bπ¬˛[º≈[.

Amflºƒˆ ƒV[ÆÁ´QÏ x[MÁÈl_ 2024ágD gı| ∞©´_ \V>D÷ 08ágD º>] ÁÔÿBV©✓t¶©✓'¶m.

562726 ƒ.z©AƒVtƒ.z©AƒVtƒ.z©AƒVtƒ.z©AƒVtƒ.z©AƒVt.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory, wife of M J Thomas, residing at No. 46, Fourth Cross Street, Annai Theresa Nagar, Moolakulam, Puducherry - 605 010, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of my deposition.

I n m y B i r t h C e r t i f i c a t e v i d e R e g i s t r a t i o n No. PM/R/1957/000365, dated 30-10-1957, issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as 'Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory'.

In my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 2560, issued by Unique Identification Authority of India, my name is mentioned as 'Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory'.

Further, I declare that in my Marriage Certificate vide Sl. No. 6260, issued by the Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as 'Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory'.

I also declare that in our Family Ration Card vide No. 131462, my name is mentioned as 'ÿ\VM¬\ˆ kÈV›][ >™∑Õ>ˆ AºÈVˆ'.

I hereby state that my husband M J Thomas's Pension Payment Order Pensioner's Portion vide No. 24033, issued by the Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as 'Monique Marie Valatine'.

I hereby declare that according to my PAN Card vide No. AGOPF9111H, issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of India, my name is mentioned as 'Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory'.

Hence, all the abovesaid names viz., 'Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory, 'ÿ\VM¬\ˆ kÈV›][ >™∑Õ>ˆ AºÈVˆ' and 'Monique Marie Valatine' are denoting one and the same person, they referring myself only.

Hearinafter, I shall be known and called by my correct name 'Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory' only for my future needs.

Whatever stated in the above affidavit is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material is concealed herein.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of April 2024.

562727 MONIQUE MARIE.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Manickam Vivekananthan, son of K. Manickam, Service No. 14568220 F, Rank Havildar, aged 60 years, residing at No. 27, Kannadasan Street, Vivek Bharathi Illam, Periyakalapet, Puducherry - 605 014, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that m y name is entered as 'Manickam Vivekananthan' in my Pension Payment Order, issued by the Cheif Office of the C.D.A. (Pensions) Allahabad, New Delhi, bearing Pension Payment Order No. S/055647/2000 (Army).

I state that my name is entered as 'Manickam Vivekananthan' in my Discharge Certificate Book, issued by Indian Army.

I state that my name is entered as 'M Vivekananthan' in my ECHS Card, issued by the ECHS Bhawan, New Delhi bearing No. CN0037763.

I state that my name is entered as 'M. Vivekananthan' in my School Transfer Certificate, issued by the Headmaster, Government Boys' Higher Secondary School, Valavanur, Tamil Nadu bearing Certificate S.No. A 078390, dated 07-06-1983.

I state that my name is entered as 'M Vivekananthan' in my Aadhaar Card, issued by Unique Identification Authority of India bearing No. XXXX XXXX 3010.

I state that my name is entered as 'Vivekananthan M' in my Joint Account Bank Passbook, State Bank of India, Main Branch, Puducherry bearing Account No. XXXXXXX979.

I state that my name is entered as 'sºkÔV™Õ>[' in my Family Ration Card, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry bearing No. 024502.

I state that my name is entered as 'M Vivekananthan' in my PAN Card, issued by Income-tax Department, Government of India bearing No. ALPPV3687E.

I state that my name is entered as 'Vivekananthan M' in my Driving Licence, issued by the India Driving Licence, Puducherry bearing DL No. AP1120000010294, dated 15-11-2000.

I state that my name is entered as ' Vivekananthan' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card, issued by Election Commission of India bearing No. GKY0597328.

I state that my name is entered as 'M Vivekananthan' in my Marriage Certificate, issued by the Marriage Officer, Oulgaret, Puducherry bearing No. 179 of 1996 dated 31-12-1996.

I state that my name is entered as 'M. Vivekananthan' in my (PONCARS) Society for the Care of the aged, Pondicherry, issued by the Government of Puducherry bearing M.No. 9100.

I submit that the names described in the abovesaid records as 'Manickam Vivekananthan', 'M Vivekananthan', 'sºkÔV™Õ>[', 'Vivekananthan M' and 'Vivekananthan' are referring one and the same person i.e., myself only.

F i n a l l y, I d e c l a r e t h a t m y c o r r e c t n a m e i s 'M Vivekananthan' only.

The statements in the abovesaid paragraphs are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 09th day of April 2024.

562728 MANICKAM VIVEKANANTHAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, E Malathi, wife of S Elango, aged 59 years (Date of birth 27-07-1964), and residing at No. 38, 3rd Cross, Vasantha Nagar, Thengaithittu Road, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as '\VÈ]' in the Family Ration Card No. 029327, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as '÷. \VÈ]' in my Sale Deed Document No. 943/94, registered with Sub-Registrar Office, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as 'E. \VÈ]' in my Sale Deed Document No. 897/2013, registered with Sub-Registrar Office, Kuttalam, Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as 'E. \VÈ]' in my Sale Deed Document No. 5658/2010, registered with Sub-Registrar Office, Vanur, Tamil Nadu.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that these names, i . e . , ' Malathi' , ' Malathi Elango' , 'E Malathi', 'Malathi E', 'B. Malathi', '÷. \VÈ]', 'E. \VÈ]' and '\VÈ]' are referring one and same person, they denoting myself only.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by the name 'B Malathi' for all purposes.

That the above particulars are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 10th day of April 2024.

562731

That my name is mentioned as 'Malathi Elango' in my husband's Pension Payment Order No. 601199302139, issued by Office of the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Prayagraj.

That my name is mentioned as 'Malathi E' in my husband's Pension Payment Order No. 31306 of Directorate of Account and Treasuries, Puducherry, of and date of birth as 27-07-1964.

Th a t m y n a m e is mentioned a s 'B Malathi' in my PAN Card No. AGNPM8033C and date of birth is 27-07-1964.

That my name is mentioned as 'B Malathi' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7544 and date of birth is 27-07-1964.

That my name is mentioned as 'E Malathi' in my ECHS Card No. CH 0000 0325 3847 and date of birth 27-07-1964, issued by ECHS Bhawan, New Delhi.

That my name is mentioned as 'B Malathi' in my Passbook Joint Account No. XXXXX9473 of Indian Bank (Defence Pension Account of my husband).

That my name is mentioned as 'B Malathi' in my Department of School Education, Government of Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as 'Malathi' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card No. IBI0167262.

✓V. \VÈ]✓V. \VÈ]✓V. \VÈ]✓V. \VÈ]✓V. \VÈ].

————

AFFIDAVIT

I , Swaminathan Elango, son o f Swaminathan, Service No. 660691 A Sergeant, aged 64 years (date of birth 06-10-1959), and residing at No. 38, 3rd Cross, Vasantha Nagar, Thengaithittu Road, Puducherry- 605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware of the facts of my deposition.

That m y name is mentioned as 'S Elango' in my Discharge Book of Indian Air Force.

That my name is mentioned as 'Swaminathan Elango' in my Pension Payment Order No. 601199302139, issued by Office of the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions), Prayagraj.

That my name is mentioned as 'S. Elango' in my Pensioner's Identity Card, issued by Directorate of Accounts And Treasuries, Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as 'S Elango' in my PAN Card No. AADPE6945K.

That my name is mentioned as 'S Elango' in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 2173.

That my name is mentioned as 'Elango S' in my ECHS Card No. CH 0000 0325 3771, issued by ECHS Bhawan, New Delhi.

That my name is mentioned as 'S Elango' in my Passbook Joint Account No. XXXXX9473 of Indian Bank (Defence Pension Account).

That my name is mentioned as 'Elango' in my Elector's Photo Identity Card No. IBI0167064.

That my name is mentioned as '÷·∫ºÔV' in my Family Ration Card No. 029327, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

Therefore, I hereby declare that these names, i.e., 'S Elango' , 'Swaminathan Elango', 'Elango S', 'Elango' and '÷·∫ºÔV' are referring one and same person and they denoting myself only.

Hereinafter, I state that I shall be known and identified only by the name 'S Elango' for all purposes.

That the above particulars are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 10th day of April 2024.

3. In my Aadhaar Card, issued by Unique Identification Authority of India in Card No. XXXX XXXX 7386, my name has been entered as 'Packiasamy Pierre'.

4. In my Pension Payment Order, issued by Office of the C.D.A (Pensions), Allahabad, my name has been entered as 'A S Pierre Packiasamy Pierre'.

5. In my Identity Card of Ex- Serviceman, my name has been entered as 'A Packiasamy Pierre'.

6. In my Savings Bank Passbook, of the State Bank of India in Account No. XXX XXX 3928, my name has been entered as 'A Packiasamy Pierre'.

7. In my Elector's Photo Identity Card, issued by t h e E l e c t i o n C o m m i s s i o n o f I n d i a i n C a r d No. TNV0201137, my name has been entered as 'Packiasamy Pierre'.

8. In my Certificate of Service with No. 1890, issued by Signal Record, Jabalpure, Madhya Pradesh, my name has been entered as 'A Packiasamy Pierre'.

9. In my Family Ration Card, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Karaikal with No. 198327, my name has been entered as '✓V¬˛BƒVt ∏ºBÏ'.

562732

S..... ÷·∫ºÔV÷·∫ºÔV÷·∫ºÔV÷·∫ºÔV÷·∫ºÔV.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Packiasamy Pierre, son of Anthonysamy Pierre, Indian, aged 72 years, residing at First Cross, Mass Nagar Extension, Near Government Stadium, V.O.C Salai, Karaikal Town and District Munsifi, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. In my Birth Certificate registered with the Karaikal Municipality, Karaikal with Registration No. K/1952, dated 03-01-1952, my name has been entered as 'Paquiassamy Pierre'.

2. In my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department with Card No. APYPP7570H, my name has been entered as 'Packiasamy Pierre'.

10. Hence, I do hereby declare that the above- mentioned names in the abovesaid documents are refering one and same person i.e., myself only.

11. To avoid confusion towards my name's, I have decided to renounce my other name's and I assumed the name 'Packiasamy Pierre''. Hence, I will be called and identified only by the name 'Packiasamy Pierre'.

12. Therefore, I do hereby renounce and relinquish the abovesaid names viz., 'Paquiassamy Pierre', 'A S Pierre Packiasamy Pierre', 'A Packiasamy Pierre' and '✓V¬˛BƒVt ∏ºBÏ' and do hereby declare that I shall be identified and called only by the name 'Packiasamy Pierre' for all my future correspondence.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at Karaikal, on this 29th day of March 2024.

Ack No. 035 PACKIASAMY PIERRE.

N o l e g a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i s a c c e p t e d f o r t h e p u b l i c a t i o n o f a d v e r t i s e m e n t r e g a r d i n g c h a n g e o f n a m e s a n d o t h e r p r i v a t e n o t i f i c a t i o n s i n t h e G a z e t t e . P e r s o n s n o t i f y i n g t h e s a m e w i l l r e m a i n s o l e l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e l e g a l c o n s e q u e n c e s a n d also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

online publication at "https://styandptg.py.gov.in" Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.