Notifications or Orders of interest to a section of the public issued by Secretariat Departments.

©

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU 2021

[Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2012-14.

[R. Dis. No. 197/2009.

[Price: Rs.4.00 Paise.

No. 24] CHENNAI, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16, 2021 Aani 2, Pilava, Thiruvalluvar Aandu–2052

Part II—Section 2

Notifications or Orders of interest to a section of the public

issued by Secretariat Departments.

NOTIFICATIONS BY GOVERNMENT

CONTENTS

Pages.

Pages.

HOME DEPARTMENT

LABOUR WELFARE AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Family Courts Act.—Appointment on Transfer of Certain District Judges Posted as Judges and Principal Judges of the Family Courts in Certain Districts .. .. 220-221

Industrial Disputes Act.—Dispute for arbitration of the agreement entered between the Management of Renault Nissan Automotive India Private Limited and Renault Nissan India Thozhilalar Sangam 221-227 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.—Appointment on Transfer of Presiding Offi cer as II Additional Special Court for exclusive Trial of cases Chennai Act etc. 221

PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL INITIATIVES DEPARTMENT

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

Acquisition of Lands

The Tamil Nadu Trade Unions Regulations,1927

Amendment to Notifi cation .. .. 227-228 Trade Unions Act, 1926 .. .. 221

[219]

D.T.P.—II-2 (24)—1220 TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE [Part II—Sec. 2

NOTIFICATIONS BY GOVERNMENT

HOME DEPARTMENT

2 S. Bhuvaneswari

Notifications under the Family Courts Act.

Judge, Family Court, Cuddalore in the existing vacancy.

III Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai

3 M. Vetricheivi,

Appointment on Transfer of Certain District Judges

Posted as Judges and Principal Judges of the Family

Courts in certain Districts under the Act.

[G.O. Rt. No. 269, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021, வைகாசி 13, பிலவ, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு-2052.] No.II(2)/HO/328/2021.—In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (i) of section 4 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (Central Act 66 of 1984), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, with the concurrence of the High Court, Chennai hereby makes the following appointment on transfer.

I Additional Distict Judge, Vellore

J u d g e , F a m i l y C o u r t , Chengalpattu vice Tmt. K.Geetha Rani, to be transferred.

4 V. Thangamariappan, Rgeistrar (District Judiciary) High Court of Madras, Chennai

I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai Vice Tmt. J. Shanthi, to be transferred.

Judge, Family Court, Krishnagiri in the existing vacancy.

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

Sl. No (1)

5 M. Selvam, Sessions Judge, Special Court, for exclusive trial of cases under POCSO Act, Vellore

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

Judge, Family Court, Tiruppur in the existing vacancy.

1 Dr. S.T. Lakshmi Ramesh, Sub Judge, Arakkonam, Ordered to be promoted and posted as Chairman, Permanent Lok Adalat, Tiruppur

Judge, Family Court, Nagercoil in the existing vacancy.

2 R Joseph Joy, Deputy Director, Regional Centre of Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy, Madurai Ordered to be promoted and posted as Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Nagercoil

Judge,Family Court,Dindigul vice Thiru. K.Singaraj, to be transferred.

3 V.P. Suganthi, Special Judge, Special Court for trail of cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Salem (Promotee District Judge)

[G.O. D. No. 573, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021, வைகாசி 13, பிலவ, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு-2052.] No.II(2)/HO/329/2021.—In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (i) of Section 4 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (Central Act 66 of 1984), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, with the concurrence of the High Court, Chennai hereby makes the following appointment on transfer.

6 K. Singaraj, Judge, Family Court, Dindigul

Judge, Family Court, Srivilliputhur in the existing vacancy.

7 K. Arivoli, Chairman, Permanent Lok Adalat, Krishnagiri

Principal Judge, Family Court, Coimbatorei, in the existing vacancy.

II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, in the existing vacancy.

8 P.Chenthoorpandi, Sessions Judge, Sessions Court for Exclusive trial of Bomb Blast Cases, Chennai

9 M . J e e v a n a n d a m , Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri

Judge, Family Court, Tiruvallur, vice Tmt. Mavis Deepika Sundaravadhana to be transferred.

Judge, Family Court, Villupuram, vice Tmt. G. Subathira Devi to be transferred.

10 V. Thenmozhe, Judge, II Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases under N.D.P.S. Act, Chennai

11 K.S. Jayamangalam, III Additional District Judge, Kallakurichi

III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, Vice Thiru D. Kingsly Christopher to be transferred.

12 A . M u r a l e e t h a r a n , Presiding Offi cer, Principal Labour Court, Vellore

Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Coimbatorei vice Thiru P. Srikumar to be transferred.

IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, Vice Tmt. A. Packia Jothi, to be transferred.

13 K. Balasubramanian, Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Vellore

Judge, Family Court, Thoothukudi in the existing vacancy.

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

Sl. No (1)

14 P. S w a m i n a t h a n , Registrar (IT cum Statistics) High Court of Madras, Chennai

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

1 M.D. Sumathi Principal District Judge, Ariyalur

Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, in the existing vacancy.

V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, Vice Thiru S. Ravi to be transferred.

15 A. Packia Jothi, IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, ChennaiJune. 16, 2021] TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE 221 VI Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, Vice Tmt J.Sridevi to be transferred.

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT Amendment to the Tamil Nadu Trade Unions Regulations,1927 under the Trade Unions Act, 1926.

16 M.A. Kabeer VII Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

17 S. Ezhi Velan,

VII Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, Vice Thiru M.A. Kabeer to be transferred.

Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of case under POCSO Act, Nagercoil.

[G.O. Ms. No. 70 Labour and Employment (K2), 10th May 2021, சித்திரை 27, பிலவ திருவள்ளுவர்

ஆண்டு-2052.]

Notifications under the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act.

No.II(2)/LE/332/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred by Section 29 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926

(Central Act, XVI of 1926), the Governor of Tamil Nadu

hereby makes the following amendment to the Tamil Nadu

Trade Unions Regulations, 1927, the draft of the same

having been previously published, as required under sub-

section (1) of Section 30 of the said Act.

A(cid:3477)(cid:3469)(cid:3478)(cid:3468)(cid:3477)(cid:3469)(cid:3478)(cid:3484)(cid:3483)

In the said Regulations after regulation 3, the following

Appointment on Transfer of Presiding Officer as

Judge II Additional Special Court for exclusive Trial

of Cases Chennai under the Act.

regulation shall be inserted, namely:-

[G.O. (Rt). No. 272, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021, வைகாசி 13, பிலவ, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு-2052.] "3-A. The Registrar of Trade Unions, if he is satisfi ed that the application for registration complies with all requirements laid down in the Act and these regulations relating to registration, shall register the Trade Union and issue a certifi cate of registration, within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of such application''.

No.II(2)/HO/330/2021.—In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of Section 36 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Central Act 61 of 1985), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, with the concurrence of the High Court, Chennai hereby makes the following appointment on transfer.

Md. NASIMUDDIN, Additional Chief Secretary to Government.

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

Sl. No (1)

LABOUR WELFARE AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

1 Thiru G. Narayanan,

Dispute for arbitration of the agreement entered between

the Management of Renault Nissan Automotive India

Private Limited and Renault Nissan India Thozhilalar

Sangam under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Presiding Offi cer, III Additional Labour Court, Chennai.

Judge, II Additional Special Court for exclusive trial of cases N.D.P.S. Act, Chennai vice Tmt. V. Thenmozhe to be transferred.

[G.O. (D) No. 227 Labour Welfare and Skill Development (A2) 9th June 2021, வைகாசி 26 பிலவ, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு-2052.] Appointment on Transfer of District Judges as Judge Special Court for exclusive Trial of Cases Villupuram under the Act.

[G.O. D. No. 574, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021, வைகாசி 13 பிலவ, திருவள்ளுவர் ஆண்டு-2052.] No.II(2)/HO/331/2021.—In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of section 36 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (Central Act 61 of 1985), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, with the concurrence of the High Court, Chennai hereby makes the following appointment on transfer.

No.II(2)/LWSD/333/2021.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Governor of Tamil Nadu hereby refer the Industrial Dispute raised between the Management of Renault Nissan Automotive India Private Limited and Renault Nissan India Thozhilalar Sangam for Arbitration and hereby publish the following terms of reference agreed in the Joint Memorandum dated 29.03.2021 in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette.

J(cid:3479)(cid:3473)(cid:3478)(cid:3484) M(cid:3469)(cid:3477)(cid:3479)(cid:3482)(cid:3465)(cid:3478)(cid:3468)(cid:3485)(cid:3477)

The Parties, the Management of Renault Nissan Automotive India Private Limited and Renault Nissan India Thozhilalar Sangam submit the following :-

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

Sl. No (1)

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under N.D.P.S. Act, Villupuram in the existing vacancy.

1 M. Suba Anbumani, District Judge of Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service, now functioning on deputation in the Puducherry Judicial Service as IInd Additional District Judge, Puducherry

S.K. PRABAKAR, Additional Chief Secretary to Government. 1. The Parties agreed that the issue relating to the charter of demands of the workmen as well as the Management, as well as certain other related issues as specifi ed in the terms of reference in the Joint Memo be referred for arbitration before a Sole Arbitrator under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act. For this purpose, the parties agree that the Sole Arbitrator would be Hon'ble Justice Mr. P. Jyothimani, Retd Judge, Hon'ble High Court.

a. The fees for arbitration would be borne by the Management in its entirety with no fi nancial commitment whatsoever in this regard on the part of the Respondent Union/Workmen.

b. The arbitrator's remuneration has been accepted by the Management at Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) per sitting and that the Management would pay the same in advance for each block of 5 sittings.

c. The venue/location for arbitration proceedings would be at a place mutually convenient to the parties and to the convenience of the Learned Arbitrator. The arrangements for arbitration would be made by the Management.

d. Both parties agree that the arbitrator is entitled to visit the plant for the purpose of adjudication/ arbitration of the issues referred herein.

e. The parties hereby undertake to furnish all such evidence directed by the Learned Arbitrator to so produce which is within their capacity to produce. This would be apart from such other evidence the parties may wish to bring on record in support of their pleadings. Both parties agree that it is open to the Learned Arbitrator to hear such other parties as he may fi nd necessary for complete adjudication/arbitration of the referred disputes herein.

2) The parties agree to co-operate in speedy conclusion of the arbitration proceedings, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the reference by the Government or such extended period as the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide.

a) To enable such early conclusion, the parties will exchange pleadings and copies of evidence including proof affi davits and be ready for trial from the date of fi rst sitting by the Ld. Arbitrator. In view of the prevailing pandemic, both parties agree that for the purpose of decision of interim relief payable to the workers pending the dispute as well as the issue relating to non-employment of Mr. Balaji (Employee No_RNT02814) will be done through virtual mode on the link to be provided by the Ld. Arbitrator.

by the management. However, as to whether the Technicians who are on the rolls of the employment on the date of publication of the Arbitration Award are entitled to bonus over and above the statutory bonus for the respective years viz., 2018-19 and 2019-20 would also be referred for arbitration as referred in the terms of reference.

5) It is agreed that the parties would request the Hon'ble Arbitrator to take up the issue relating to interim relief as well as the termination of Mr.Balaji specifi ed in item Nos.35 and 36 of the terms of reference and decide the same in the fi rst instance within 15 days of the reference for arbitration or such extended period as the arbitrator may decide, before deciding the other issues under the arbitration.

6) It is open to the Hon'ble Arbitrator to pass such interim awards / award as deemed appropriate, on any of the terms of reference during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings, as deemed fi t.

7) During the pendency of the dispute before the Hon'ble Arbitrator and / or a settlement being arrived at, the parties shall ensure smooth functioning of the factory operations and not act in any manner that may cause disruption in the operations. The Union will not commence any strike or direct action with regard to the issues set out herein for the purpose of arbitration. In other words, during the pendency of arbitration, the Respondent Union will not commence any strike or direct action in pursuit of its demands referred for arbitration.

8) The venue of the arbitration would be as mutually agreed by the parties and the convenience of the Hon'ble Arabitrator.

TERMS OF REFERENCE TO THE HON'BLE ARBITRATOR

No.

Demands

b) It is also agreed by the Management that they would bear the clerical expenditure for such assistance as the Ld. Arbitrator may need for the completion of the arbitration.

3) It is agreed by the Management that the suspension pending enquiry of M/s.Parthasarathy and Logeswaran will be lifted forthwith, viz., from the date of the order of the Writ Petition. Both the employees will agree to co-operate with the speedy completion of the enquiry proceedings, viz., within four months. If, upon completion of the enquiry proceedings, the employees are found guilty of the charges leveled, then, such appropriate punishment other than termination / dismissal from service would be imposed.

4) As regards bonus for years 2018-19 and 2019- 20, the Management has not paid bonus to such of those technicians who do not qualify for bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The Management agrees to extend the minimum statutory bonus of 8.33%, as calculated under the payment of Bonus Act, 1965 as a onetime gesture, even to those persons who did not qualify for receiving this bonus and who were not paid such minimum bonus for the respective years. Such payment will be made to those technicians who have not received the payment within the period of one month from the date of the order of the Hon'ble High Court. The Union disputes the claim that those persons who have not been paid bonus are disentitled or disqualifi ed, as claimed 1) Demand No.1 – Basic Wages:- Presently, the basic wage of technicians is between 8499 and 18139. The basic pay fi xation has not been done in a rational manner. In that, the technicians who have longer experience draw less basic pay. Everybody's basic pay should be level at Rs.18,000/- per month and a further amount of Rs.5000/- to be paid so that the basic pay is Rs.23,000/- per month and a pay scale fi xed on that basis for all technicians.

2) DEMAND No.2 – FIXED DEARNESS ALLOWANCE:- Presently technicians are paid Variable Fixed Dearness Allowance at the rate of 10% of the basic pay for the year and therefore there is a disparity in the matter of Fixed Dearness Allowance. Technicians receive variable fixed dearness allowance ranging from Rs.2,833/- to Rs.6,046/-. This has to be changed to Rs.6,000/- as Fixed Dearness Allowance for all technicians and they should be given an increase of another Rs.6,000/- as Fixed Dearness Allowance so that the technicians will receive Rs.12,000/- as Fixed Dearness Allowance.

No.

Demands

No.

Demands

3) DEMAND No.3 – VARIABLE DEARNESS A L L O WA N C E : - P r e s e n t l y t h e r e i s n o Variable Dearness Allowance paid to the technicians. The technicians should be paid Variable Dearness Allowance on the cost-of-living index Chennai 2001 series at the rate of Rs.25 per point above 100 points. For example, for the month of December 2018, the cost-of-living index Chennai 2001 series is 274. After reducing 100 points the remaining is 174 points for which at the rate of Rs.25 per point the amount comes as Rs.4,350/-.

4) DEMAND No.4 – ANNUAL INCREMENT:-Whether the demand of the Union for payment of annual increment of Rs.500/- per year is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

5) DEMAND No.5 – HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the union for payment of House Rent Allowance uniformly for all Technicians, a sum of Rs.18,000/- per month as against the existing practice of differential House Rent Allowance between Rs.6,798 to Rs.14,511/- is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

6) DEMAND No.6 – EDUCATION ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union that the Technicians should be paid Rs.2,000/- per month as education allowance is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

7) DEMAND No.7- WASHING ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union for grant of increase in washing allowance from the existing sum of Rs.100/- per month to Rs.1,500/- per month is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

8) DEMAND No.8 – SHIFT ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in shift allowance for Technicians from Rs.30/- to Rs.100/- For B Shift i.e., from 15:30 hours – 00:00 hours and for increase from Rs.83/- to Rs.150/- for C Shift i.e., from 00:00 hours – 07:00 hours is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

9) DEMAND No.9 – SUNDAY ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in Sunday Allowance for Technicians working on Sundays from existing Rs.200/- to Rs.400/- is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

10) DEMAND No.10 – HEAT ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in Heat allowance for Technicians from Rs.100/- per month to Rs.200/- per month is justifi ed ? Whether the demand of the Union for Rs.500/- per month for Technicians working in Body Shop, Casting Shop and Heat Treatment Division over and above the Heat Allowance of Rs.200/- given to all the Technicians thereby totaling Rs.700/- per month is justifi ed? If so, to pass suitable orders.

11) DEMAND No.11 – CHEMICAL ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union for payment of Rs.500/- per month as chemical allowance for technicians working Paint Shop is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

12) DEMAND No.12 – LEAVE TRAVEL ALLOWANCE:- Whether the demand of the Union for payment of one month's gross salary as Leave Travel Allowance, as against the existing one month's basic pay and Dearness Allowance is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

13) DEMAND No.13 – PRODUCTION INCENTIVE:- Whether the demand of the Union for payment of Production incentive at 1% of the sale profi t to be divided equally to the Technicians including contract workers directly engaged in production process and the payment to be made on 7th of May every year is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

14) DEMAND No.14.1(a) – INSURANCE FACILITIES:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the medical insurance scheme for technicians and family members from the existing Rs.2,00,000/- to Rs.6,00,000/- is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

Demand No.14.1(b) – Whether the demand of the union for increase in the Outpatient treatment for the Technician and family members from the existing Rs.250/- per month (viz., Rs.3,000/- per annum) to Rs.500/- per month (viz., Rs.6,000/- per annum) is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders 14.2 – GROUP TERM LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in Group Term Life Insurance Coverage for death due to natural causes or accident, from the existing Rs.15,00,000/- or twice the annual CTC, to Rs.25,00,000/- or thrice the annual CTC, whichever is higher, is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

14.3 –GROUP PERSONAL ACCIDENT:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the Group Personal Accident Insurance for Technicians from Rs.5,00,000/- to Rs.10,00,000/- is justifi ed? If so, to pass suitable orders.

14.4 – Mediclaim:- Whether the Demand of the Union for increase in the mediclaim insurance to ensure the following is justifi ed ?

a) Room rent covered by insurance should be raised to Rs.3,500/- per day.

b) Network Hospitals covered under insurance should be increased.

No.

Demands

No.

Demands

c) The buffer insurance amount should be increased twice as that of the present insurance coverage considering the fatality of disease or the nature of the accident and the medical expenditure spent exceeding the present insurance coverage.

d) Six of the technician's family members (including Father-In-Law and Mother-In-Law) besides the technician himself should be covered by the general medical insurance.

15) DEMAND No.15 – UNIFORM& SAFETY SHOES: Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the uniforms from the existing pre-stitched 2 T-Shirts, 2 Shirts and 3 pants to 3 readymade T-Shirts and unstitched material for 3 shirts and 4 pants together with a sum of Rs.3,500/- towards stitching charges is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

Whether the demand of the Union for providing one pair of safety shoes as every year as the previous policy, as against the existing practice of a pair of safety shoe for every two years is justifi ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

16) DEMAND No.16 – RAINCOAT:–Whether the demand of the Union for providing a rain-jacket cum wind-cheater every year during rainy and winter seasons is justifi ed ? if so to pass suitable orders.

17) DEMAND No.17 – COCONUT OIL & HORLICKS:– Whether the demand of the Union for increase of coconut oil from half liter to one liter and from half kg Boost to one Kg Horlicks is justifi ed ? if so to pass suitable orders.

18) DEMAND No.18 – WORKLOAD: Whether the demand of the Union for fi xing the workload at 390 minutes for a 8 hour shift and appointment of one reliever for ten technicians for the purpose of attending calls of nature is justifi ed ? if so to pass suitable orders.

19) DEMAND No.19 – LEAVE:

1. Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the casual leave and sick leave of seven days each and earned leave of 21 days annually, to casual leave and sick leave of ten days each and thirty days of earned leave is justifi ed ?

2. Whether the demand of the Union for encashment of surrender of earned leave from the existing practice of basic pay, to gross salary is justifi ed? 3. Whether the demand of the Union for permission with prior sanction upto four hours in a month without deductions of salary is justifi ed ?

4. Whether the demand of the Union for increase of leave of one day for death of family member to three days is justifi ed?

5. Whether the demand of the union for increase in the paternity leave from three days to six days is justifi ed?

6. Whether the demand of the Union for grant of special leave of three days for the marriage of technician, besides regular casual leave, sick leave and earned leave is justifi ed?

7. Whether the demand of the Union for payment of additional sum of Rs.100/- per additional wage day for working more than six days in a week is justifi ed?

8. Whether the demand of the Union for reimbursement of 20% of the leave in case of accident and serious illness and where the employee exhausts his leave arising out of the same, is justifi ed?

9. Whether the demand of the Union for transfer of leave at credit from one technician to another in case of any accident or serious illness of such technician and arising out of which he does not have enough leave to avail, is justifi ed? 10. Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the maternity leave from six months to 12 months is justifi ed ?

11. Whether the demand of the Union for grant of leave as recommended under statute, in case of the technician undergoing birth control surgery, is justifi ed ?

20) DEMAND No.20 – AYUDHA PUJA GIFT: Whether the demand of the Union for Ayudha Pooja gift coupons worth Rs.10,000/- or 4 grams of gold coins every year, is justifi ed ?

21) DEMAND No.21 – SPECIAL CAR SCHEME: Whether the demand of the Union for providing discount of 30% for car manufactured by the company, as against the existing 4% is justifi ed? Whether the demand of the Union for sale of used car at discounted price of 50% to the technicians on seniority basis is justifi ed ?

22) DEMAND No.22 – FUNERAL EXPENSES:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the funeral expenses to family members of Technicians from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.50,000/- is justifi ed ?

23) DEMAND No.23–Death Relief & Compassionate appointment :- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the deduction of contribution towards death relief from Rs.200 per month to Rs.300 per month is justifi ed ?

Whether the demand of the Union for providing employment to the family member of the Technician on compassionate grounds by treating the position as vacant, as against the existing practice of considering the appointments based on vacancies during recruitment process, is justifi ed?

No.

Demands

No.

Demands

30) DEMAND No.30 – DISASTER MANAGEMENT

24) DEMAND No.24–Taste and Quality of the Food

& Canteen:-

a. Whether the demand of the Union for improvement in the quality and taste of foodstuff and the expenditure for the same to be increased twice is justifi ed?

b. Whether the demand of the Union for providing air-conditioned dining halls is justifi ed? c. Whether the demand of the Union for providing a separate fund for improving the kitchen and quality of food, is justifi ed?

RELIEF:- Whether the demand of the Union for a refundable relief of Rs.50,000/-, when the technician or his family members or his assets are affected by natural disaster without any interest, to be recovered in ten monthly instalments and additionally, a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards non- refundable relief, is justifi ed ?

31) DEMAND No.31 – Whether the demand of the Union for not deploying 13 robots in body shop and 15 robots in paint shop, which poses potential threat to employment of technicians, is justifi ed?

32) DEMAND No.32 – Leave Procedure:-

d. Whether the demand of the Union for providing eggs along with the food on all days and increasing the non-vegetarian food from three days to four days, besides Sundays and for avoiding the same kind of non-vegetarian food and to provide varieties in the food, is justifi ed ?

25) DEMAND No.25–Soap and Washing Powder Whether the demand of the Union for providing 2 Hamam Soaps, ½ Kg of Surf Excel, and 3 washing soaps to Technicians, is justifi ed ?.

26) DEMAND No.26–Women Technicians:- Whether the demand of the union for providing lesser workload to women technicians and also for allotment of work only during the fi rst shift hours viz., from 7:00 hours and 15:30 hours or in the general shift, is justifi ed ?.

(A) As the present procedures of the leave system are improper, the management should revert to the old policy of giving acknowledgement in hand after submission of the leave application.

(B) In an unforeseen circumstance where a technician takes leave without giving prior notice, he should be allowed to give notice within 24 hours of resuming his employment.

27) DEMAND No.27–Transport Facilities:-

a. Whether the demand of the Union for maintenance of the bus provided for transportation for Technicians be improved and that the buses should be changed once in 4-5 years is justifi ed ?

(C) When a leave application is submitted 3 days in advance for the purpose of attending a family function, the application should be disposed of expeditiously without any unreasonable delay. In case of a rejection, the management should give in writing the reason for such rejection.

(D) If the reason for the rejection of the l e a v e i s f o u n d t o b e n o t g e n u i n e , t h e n t h e t e c h n i c i a n s h o u l d b e p a i d 3 days of wages for that day.

33) DEMAND No.33 – SOME OF THE BENEFITS

UNDER SETTLEMENT DATED 20.02.2017 YET

TO BE IMPLEMENTED, NOT IN DEROGATION

OF CERTAIN OTHER BENEFITS YET TO BE

IMPLEMENTED:-

b. Whether the demand of the Union that the drivers of the buses be provided proper breaks and time for rest as well as provide a room to take rest and to avail food in the dining hall, is justifi ed ?

c. Whether the demand of the Union that qualifi ed drivers be appointed, is justifi ed?

d. Whether the demand of the Union for providing air-conditioned buses for commutation is justifi ed? 28) DEMAND No.28 – PRODUCTION PLAN:- Whether the demand of the Union for providing the monthly production plan 7 days in advance, is justifi ed ?

29) DEMAND No.29 – LONG TERM AWARD:- Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the long term award as per clause 4(1) of the 12(3) Settlement dated 20/02/17 from Rs.10,000/- to Rs.15,000/- and also providing additionally, 4 grams Gold Coin is justified ? Whether the demand of the Union for providing a long term award of Rs.25,000/- and 6 Grams of gold for those Technicians completing 15 years of service, is justifi ed ?

(A) Back wages pending to the technicians should be paid immediately as under clause 8(c) of the 12 (3) settlement dated 20. 02. 2017.

(B) The pending construction of the gym should be resumed immediately.

(C) The co-operative store should be started immediately.

(D) The stone bed should be constructed immediately as per Clause 5.2 of the 12(3)-settlement dated 20.02.2017.

(E) As per Clause 5.5 of the 12(3) settlement dated 20/02/17 the team building activity did not take place as mentioned in the settlement. Therefore, every technician s h o u l d b e p a i d R s . 6 0 0 / - o n c e e v e r y 6 months and the same should be raised to Rs.1000/- in the future.

No.

Demands

No.

Demands

DEMANDS OF THE MANAGEMENT

34) DEMAND No.34–Interim Relief:- Whether the demand of the Union for grant of interim relief of Rs.20,000/- pending the hearing and resolution of the industrial dispute, is justifi ed ?

35) DEMAND No.35–Termination of Balaji (Employee No_RNT02814):- Whether the Management is justifi ed in terminating the services of Mr.Balaji for certain acts of misconduct vide order dated 16.12.2019. If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?

39) DEMAND No.39–Wage Increase:- Whether the demand of the Management that in view of the current business scenario and COVID-19 pandemic situation, there would not be any increase in wages till the date of the award that may be passed by the Arbitrator and as such, any increase will only be prospective from the date of the Award, is justifi ed?

40) DEMAND No.40–Key Performance Indicator for

grant of increase in basic / DA / Increment, etc.,

36) DEMAND No.36–Bonus for the years 2018-19 and 2019-20:- Whether the demand of the Union for payment of bonus over and above the statutory minimum of 8.33% for the years 2018-19 and 2019-20 is justifi ed ?

37) DEMAND No.37–Sunday Working:-

1) Whether the cessation of payment of twice of wages for working on Sundays from December 2019 by the Management is an alteration of condition of service and whether such alteration is void for violation of Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act? To what relief the workers are entitled to ?

2) Whether the demand of the Union for restoring the earlier practice of providing twice the wages for those workmen who are called for work on Sundays, together with one alternate holiday, is justifi ed?

38) DEMAND No.38–Appointment of Enquiry Officer:- Whether the demand of the Union for fi xing a panel of Enquiry Officers by the Hon'ble Arbitrator for conducting any domestic enquiry and any domestic enquiry into the allegations of the workmen be conducted by any one such Enquiry Offi cer from and among the panel of Enquiry Offi cers as decided by the Arbitrator, is justifi ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management for fi xing Key Performance Indicators, comprising safety, discipline, attendance, productivity, quality and delivery volume as parameters, in the following manner is justifi ed ?

· Key Performance Indicators is fi xed for the proposed wage increase for Technicians and establish the linkage between wage increase and performance.

· Any wage increase will be subject to the achievement of above mentioned KPIs.

· Technicians will get full wage increase after achievement of 100% of the KPI's. The wage increase will be paid on prorate basis based upon the actual achievement numbers in case the achievement is lower than 100%.

· At the beginning of every fi nancial year, the Key Performance Indictors will be communicated to the Technicians through notice boards.

No.

Demands

No.

Demands

41) DEMAND No.41–Leave benefits:- Whether the demand of the Management to reduce the present accumulation of earned leave from 180 days to a maximum of 30 days and providing encashment of the leave beyond the said maximum days on the existing practice of basic wages, is justifi ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management for reduction of national and festival holidays from the existing 12 days to 9 days, as provided in the statute, is justifi ed ?

42) DEMAND No.42–Annual Master Health Check- up:-Whether the demand of the Management to amend the current periodicity for annual master health check-up for Technicians as once in three years up to 40 years and once in 2 years for above 40 years is justifi ed?

43) DEMAND No.43–Dependents medical insurance coverage:- While the Management is bearing the entire cost of insurance premium for the technician, spouse and two children, the Management has demanded 50% insurance premium for the parents / in-laws subject to a maximum of six persons (Technician + 5 persons) ? whether such a demand of the Management is justifi ed ?

49) DEMAND No.49–Lockdown Wages:-Whether the demand of the Management for adjustment of wages paid for COVID 19 pandemic lockdown days is justifi ed?

50) DEMAND No.50–Flexibility in working:-Due to volatility in business situation, the company will take a decision based to market situation. Sunday working (Comp off) and Over Timework will be announced. All technicians should co-operate fully without any demand.

51) DEMAND No.51–Cost to the Company:-Whether the demand of the Management that any increase that may be granted under the Award of the Hon'ble Arbitrator would be based on cost to company basis, viz., a consolidated increase will be arrived and which would be split into various components apart from Shift allowance / Sunday Allowance.

52) DEMAND No.52–Bonus Payment:-Whether the demand of the Management that any bonus so payable would be only in accordance with the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, without any demand thereafter.

53) DEMAND No.53–Automation & Technology

Advancement:-

44) DEMAND No.44–Treatment of shutdown holidays:- Whether the demand of the Management to treat all maintenance shutdown days declared by management as holidays and adjust the leave on the earned / casual leave at credit is justifi ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management to only pay normal wages for such technicians who are called for duty during such shutdown days is justifi ed ?

45) DEMAND No.45–Treatment of Non-Production days (NPD):-Whether the demand of the Management to treat non-production days (other than maintenance shut down days) as holidays with 50% wages for the Technicians is justifi ed ?

46) DEMAND No.46–Canteen Facility:- Whether the demand of the Management for having the canteen expenses on a cost sharing basis at 50-50 is justifi ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management that the Technicians should co-operate with all new technological changes including such changes that will improve productivity and also co-operate by actively participating in such trainings / programmes that will improve the productivity / quality, is justifi ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management that the technicians should extend their full co-operation in all the internal compliances training, Global Engagement Survey, Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH)., etc as planned from time to time, is justifi ed ?

R. KIRLOSH KUMAR, Secretary to Government. PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL INITIATIVES DEPARTMENT

Acquisition of Lands

Amendment to Notification

[Letter No. 3708/PD&SI (SI)/2020, Dated: 21.05.2021]

47) DEMAND No.47–Transportation:-Whether the demand of the Management for having the transportation facility on a cost sharing basis of 50-50 is justifi ed ?

48) DEMAND No.48–Staggered Weekly Off:- Whether the demand of the Management for introduction of staggered weekly off for all departments as and when the Management i n t r o d u c e s a c o n t i n u o u s w o r k i n g , i s justifi ed ?

The following amendment to the Notifi cations No.II(2)/ PDSI/182/2021 under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land or Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) approved in G.O.Ms.No.104, Planning, Development and Special Initiative (S.I) Department, dated 23.02.2021 Published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No.10 in Part II-Section 2 dated 10.3.2021 for the acquisition of lands in Chennai District, Egmore Taluk,Nungambakkam Village is issued:-

M.A. SIDDIQUE,

Principal Secretary to Government.

PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF STATIONERY AND PRINTING, CHENNAI ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU