Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Panaji, 10th February, 2022 (Magha 21, 1943) SERIES II No. 46 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
Note:- There are four Extraordinary issues to the Official Gazette, Series II No. 45 dated
03-02-2022 as follows:—
(1) Extraordinary dated 3-2-2022 from pages 1249 to 1250 regarding Order from Department of Home.
(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 6-2-2022 from pages 1251 to 1252 regarding Notification from Department
of General Administration.
(3) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 8-2-2022 from pages 1253-1254 regarding Notification from Department of General Administration and Orders from Department of Home and Department of Housing.
(4) Extraordinary (No. 4) dated 9-2-2022 from pages 1255 to 1258 regarding Notifications and Circular from
Department of Finance.
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Corporation of the City of Panaji
Administrative Section __
10. Shri Avelino De Souza — Socio Econo-
mically Disadvantage
Representative.
Agnelo A. J. Fernandes, Commissioner.
Order
Ref. No. 131/2022/CCP/Admn/Child Com/ /2022-23/47
Panaji, 28th January, 2022.
V. No. AP-983/2022.
———uuu———
Department of Education, Art & Culture Directorate of Higher Education
__
Certificate
The Child Committee is constituted consisting of the following members as per Notification No. 2-137-2006/OW & CD from Directorate of Women & Child Development, Government of Goa:
1. Miss Aditi Chopdekar — Councillor, CCP.
2. Smt. Regina M. Vaz — Superintendent,
CCP.
3. Mast Lyndon Varghese — Boy Child.
4. Miss Sace Sachin Bhandari — Girl Child.
5. Smt. Geeta Mayenkar — Health Staff,
UHC.
6. Smt. Sunita Lopes — Teacher.
7. Smt. Sharaya Waradkar — Anganwadi
Teacher.
8. Miss Divya Raphael — NGO.
9. Shri Yogesh Kankonkar — Legal
Representative.
No. ACAD III/GC/Filling of Post-Regular/98/ /2021/6679
Read: Order No. ACAD III/GC/Filling of Post-
Regular/98/2021/5271 dated 02-12-2021.
Certified that the character and antecedents of Ms. Sayali K. Gaunkar appointed to the post of Assistant Professor in Sociology (Group 'A' Gazetted) at Government College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Quepem under Directorate of Higher Education vide above referred Order has been verified by the Addl. District Magistrate, South Goa, Margao-Goa and nothing adverse has been reported against her at Police Stations in Goa.
H. B. Khedekar, Under Secretary (Higher Education).
Porvorim, 1st February, 2022.
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected] 1259OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022
Certificate
No. ACAD III/GC/Filling of Post-Regular/98/2021/6680
Read: Order No. ACAD III/GC/Filling of Post-Regular/98/2021/5689 dated 22-12-2021.
Certified that the character and antecedents of Ms. Anupama A. Gaonkar appointed to the post of Assistant Professor in Commerce (Group 'A' Gazetted) at Government College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Quepem under Directorate of Higher Education vide above referred Order has been verified by the Addl. District Magistrate, South Goa, Margao-Goa and nothing adverse has been reported against her at Police Stations in Goa.
H. B. Khedekar, Under Secretary (Higher Education).
Porvorim, 1st February, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Environment & Climate Change
___
Order
No. 7/4/98/STE/DIR/Part I/1191
In pursuance of the sub-rule (3) of Rule 5 of the Noise Pollution (Regulation & Control) Rules, 2000, the Government of Goa is pleased to direct the "authority" specified in the Government Notification No. 7/4/98/STE/DIR/Part I/922 dated 04-12-2007, published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 37 dated 13-12-2007, Notification No. 7/4/98/STE/DIR/Part I/1545 dated 15-01-2010, Notification No. 7/4/98/STE/DIR/ /Part I/104 dated 23-04-2015 and Notification No. 7/4/98/STE/DIR/Part II/480 dated 12-09-2019, to permit the use of loudspeakers or public address system during night hours from 10.00 p.m. to 06.00 a.m. during the year 2022, on the days specified in the Schedule hereto, throughout the State of Goa.
"Terms and conditions for issue of permission.
1. The permission shall be granted only on a case-to-case basis, in response to a specific application made by the concerned Village Panchayat, Municipal Corporation/Municipal Council or an individual.
2. The provisions of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 shall be strictly complied with.
3. The 'authority' concerned shall monitor the noise levels during the permitted festive occasion and take prompt remedial action in the event of any violation of the same and of above conditions."
SCHEDULE
Cultural/Religious Date
Sr. No.
Festive occasion
27th February, 2022. 18th March, 2022. 17th April, 2022. 18th April, 2022.
10. Kojagiri Poornima 11. Diwali Eve 12. Diwali 13. Tripurari/Kartiki Pornima 14. Christmas Eve
1. Carnival (Last day of Carnival) 2. Holi 3. Easter Eve 4. Easter Day 5. Ganesh Chaturthi (2nd day of idol immersion) 01st September, 2022. 6. Ganesh Chaturthi (5th day of idol immersion) 05th September, 2022. 09th September, 2022. 7. Anant Chaturdashi 26th September, 2022. 8. Navaratri (1st day of Navaratri) 05th October, 2022. 9. Navaratri (last day of Navaratri) 09th October, 2022. 23rd October, 2022. 24th October, 2022. 07th November, 2022. 24th December, 2022.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 20221
2
15. Christmas 16. New Year's Eve 17. New Year Day
3
25th December, 2022. 31st December, 2022. 1st January, 2023.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dasharath M. Redkar, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary (Env. & Climate Change).
Panaji, 7th February, 2022.
———uuu———
Goa Human Rights Commission
Office of the Goa Human Rights Commission
Before the Goa Human Rights Commission Panaji-Goa
Proceeding No. 181/2019
Vidhya Shetkar, F-6, Mandavi Residency, Housing Board Colony, Alto Porvorim, Goa-403521 … Complainant.
V/s
1) The Chairman,
Shri Damodar Education Society, Gudi-Paroda, Quepem-Goa.
2) The Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Porvorim-Goa.
3) The Dy. Director of Education,
South Educational Zone, Margao-Goa … Respondents.
Inquiry Report/Order
(07th October, 2021)
The Complaint dated 11-07-2019 was received
from the Complainant, Smt. Vidya Shetkar, seeking settlement of final withdrawal of her Provident Fund.
It is the case of the Complainant that she was working as Asstt. Teacher at in Damodar English High School at Gudi, Paroda and she opted for voluntary retirement in the year 2015 and submitted her application dated 25-11-2016 for final withdrawal of GPF which is not settled and her human rights have been violated.
2. on perusing the complaint, by Order dated 16-07-2019, the Commission called for the report from the Respondent No. 1, i.e. the Chairman, Shree Damodar Education Society, Gudi-Paroda.
3. The Respondent No. 1 filed their report dated 31-08-2019 stating that the Complainant had voluntarily resigned on 16-06-2015. In the year 2014, there were complaints regarding her bogus B. A. Degree Certificate. She opted for voluntary retirement from 16-06-2015 and was relieved from her duties.
The Respondent No. 1 stated that, in the month of June, the forgery case was registered in the Quepem Police Station and the police took her service book and personal file for investigation. After receiving both the documents, they forwarded the pension papers to the South Educational Zone, Margao who refused her final GPF payment and requested to forward the papers after getting the report from the Vigilance Department.
4. The Complainant, then filed her Rejoinder dated 20-03-2020. She stated that she had opted for voluntary resignation. By subsequent letters, she requested the Respondent No. 1 to consider her voluntary resignation as "voluntary retirement". She also stated that the forgery case has been disposed by the Sessions Court. She stated that she had refunded the excess payment which she received after her promotion for the period from 28-12-2010 to 16-06-2015 being an amount of Rs. 45,690/-. She also stated that there is no vigilance case pending at present and to direct the Respondent No. 1 and Director of Education to settle her GPF withdrawal and pension case.
5. Subsequently, the Complainant filed her second, Rejoinder dated 20-08-2020 that she had complied with the information demanded by the Respondent No. 1, for finalizing her GPF
and pension case.
6. The Commission, by Order dated 20-08-2020 called for the report from the Director of Education, Porvorim, who was added as Respondent No. 2.
7. On 10-12-2020, the Commission added Dy. Director of Education, South Educational Zone, Margao as Respondent No. 3 and called for their report.
8. The Respondent No. 3 filed their report dated 13-01-2021 stating that their office has received OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022
the pension case of the Complainant on 13. The Respondent No. 3 has stated that the
06-04-2016 and it was returned back to the papers of the Complainant were re-submitted
School seeking details. The Respondent No. 3 by the School by letter dated 05-12-2018 for
stated that the case was re-submitted by the considering her case as voluntary retirement.
School and was again returned seeking The Respondent No. 3 had then asked the
clarification. School for the letter of the Complainant to
consider her voluntary retirement in place of
9. The Respondent No. 3 have further stated that
voluntary resignation and the Order from the
the pension papers were returned and
competent Authority accepting the voluntary
re-submitted seven times by the Respondent
retirement.
No.1 and lastly, on 24-11-2020, the same has
14. The Respondent No. 3 had stated that the
been forwarded to the Directorate of Accounts,
pension papers were again re-submitted along
Panaji.
with the Court Orders and the School letter
10. At the stage of final arguments, Shri Rohidas dated 07-01-2019 by the Respondent No. 1 and
Shetkar, husband of the Complainant was subsequently, by letter dated 24-11-2020 and
heard and Respondent No. 1 was absent. Shri the same was forwarded to the Directorate of
D. Chawdikar, Dy. Director of Education (Legal) Accounts.
was heard on behalf of the Respondents No. 2
15. The letter dated 12-02-2021 of the Respondent
& 3. The Complainant has relied on the
No. 1 addressed to the Respondent No.3
Judgment of Supreme Court in support of his
indicates that the Respondent No. 1 had
arguments.
entered the words "Voluntary Retirement" in
11. In Sudip Chandra Sarkar vs Tata Iron & Steel her service book as advised by the Director of
Co. Ltd., AR 1994 SC 1064, the Hon'ble Education, Porvorim.
Supreme Court was considering a case where 16. Section 18(a) of The Protection of Human
the plaintiff had rendered continuous service Rights Act, 1993 reads as under:-
for 20 years and 8 months and he had
"(a) where the inquiry discloses the
submitted the letter of resignation which was
commission of violation of human rights or
accepted by the Respondent. On these facts,
negligence in the prevention of violation of
the Apex Court held as under:
human rights or abetment thereof by a public
"The termination of service was thus on servant, it may recommend to the concerned
account of resignation of the plaintiff being Government or authority—
accepted by the Respondent. The plaintiff has, (i) to make payment of compensation or
within the meaning of the expression, thus damages to the complainant or to the victim
retired from service of the Respondent and he or the members of his family as the Commission
is qualified for payment of gratuity in terms of may consider necessary;
Rule 6". (ii) to initiate proceedings for prosecution or
This authority was referred to in the such other suitable action as the Commission
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the may deem fit against the concerned person or
case of Sheelkumar Jain vs New India persons;
Assurance Co. Ltd., decided by the Division (iii) to take such further action as it may think
Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on fit".
28-07-2011.
17. Under Section 18(a) of the Protection of Human
it was held therein that the Court will have Rights Act, 1993, the Commission recommends
to construe the statutory provisions in each that, the Respondents No. 2 & 3 consider that
case to find out whether the termination of the Complainant had "voluntarily retired" on
service of an employee was a termination by 16-06-2015 and ensure that the Complainant
way of resignation or a termination by way of receives her pension and GPF amount in
voluntary retirement. accordance with law.
12. The husband of the Complainant had argued 18. Under Section 18(e) of the Protection of Human
that though the Complainant had given a letter Rights Act, 1993, the Commission shall send a
for resignation, the same has to be treated as copy of the Inquiry Report together with its
voluntary retirement and her pensionary recommendations to the Respondent and the
benefits have to be released. Respondent shall within a period of one month
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 46
10TH FEBRUARY, 2022
or such further time as the Commission may allow, forward its comments on the report, including the action taken or proposed to be taken thereon to the Commission.
19. Copy of the Inquiry Report be sent to the Respondents No. 2 & 3, calling for their comments, including the action taken or proposed to be taken within a period of one month or on or before 29-10-2021, in terms of Section 18(e) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Date: 07-10-2021.
Place: Panaji-Goa.
Sd/-
Sd/- Sd/-
Justice U. V. Bakre, Desmond D'Costa,
Pramod V. Kamat Chairperson, Member, Member, Goa Human Goa Human Goa Human Rights Rights Rights Commission. Commission. Commission.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022Before the Goa Human Rights Commission Panaji-Goa
Proceeding No. 181/2019
Mrs. Vidhya R. Shetkar, F-6, Mandavi Residency, Housing Board Colony, Alto Porvorim, Goa-403521 ..… Appellant.
V/s
1) The Chairman,
Shri Damodar Education Society, Gudi-Paroda, Goa .. Respondent No. 1.
2) The Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Porvorim-Goa ...Respondent No. 2.
3) The Dy. Director of Education,
South Educational Zone, Margao-Goa ...Respondent No. 3.
Dated: 26-11-2021.
Rejoinder to Report
With reference to the Proceeding No. 181/2019/ /967 dated 19-10-2021, I am to submit here the comments/action taken report in respect of settlement of final withdrawal of Provident Fund & Pension of Mrs. Vidhya R. Shetkar.
It is brought to the notice that the papers of GPF final withdrawal forwarded to the Jt. Director of Accounts, Directorate of Education, Porvorim-Goa, for sanction order. The papers were returned with observation by Directorate of Education, Porvorim vide Letter No. DE/ACCTS/X/1/GPF.A.CPF./2020/ /1967 dated 30-03-2021 (Annexure-I) to this office and subsequently it was forwarded to the School for Compliance vide this office letter No. SEZ/ /Acctts/GPF/2020/158 dated 07-04-2021.
The School complied with the observations raised and submitted the GPF papers to this office, vide letter No. DEHS/GPF-125/2020-21/2106 dated 03-06-2021 (Annexure-II) but was returned back to school with few observation vide letter No. SEZ/ /Acctts/GPF/2020/1433 dated 21-06-2021 for compliance, GPF case is not yet received to this office after compliance.
In respect of Pension case of Mrs. Vidhya R. Shetkar, Graduate Teacher is re-submitted by Damodar English High School, Gudi-Paroda, vide their office letter No. DEHS/PEN-185/2021-22/2208 dated 27-10-2021. Accordingly this office have forwarded the pension case to Directorate of Accounts, Panaji vide this office letter No. SEZ/Accts/Aided/Pens/ /21/5598 dated 01-11-2021.
Dr. Uday C. Gaunker,
Dy. Director of Education &
Respondent No. 3.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022––––––––
Office of the Goa Human Rights Commission
Proceeding No. 57/2013
Inquiry Report
The Complainant was working as secondary teacher at St. Anthony's High School, Monte de Guirim since September, 1976 and retired on 31-08-2012 on superannuation. The Complainant has approached this Commission with a grievance that although she retired on 31-08-2012, she has not been paid her monthly pension and also other terminal benefits even though seven months had lapsed after her retirement. She has further stated that all her efforts and meetings with various officials of Education Department and Headmaster of the School have gone in vain. She has also stated that in case the lumpsum amount of terminal benefits was paid to her and invested in the Bank, she would have earned some amount of interest for delayed payment from October, 2012. She has also claimed interest on such amount for the period of delay.
2. On the basis of the complaint, this Commission initially issued notices to the Respondents No. 1 and 2 i.e. the Director of Education and Director of Accounts, Panaji–Goa respectively. However, during the course of inquiry, the Headmaster, St. Anthony's High School and the Chairman, School Managing Committee, St. Anthony's School were added as Respondents No. 3 and 4 respectively and notices were issued to them. All the Respondents have filed their respective replies.
3. Thereafter, the Respondent No. 2/Director of Accounts filed an application dated 21-10-2013 stating therein that the claim of the GPF has been settled in the month of September, 2013 and the pension case of the Complainant had been disposed OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022 of on 11-10-2013. The Respondent No. 1/Director of Education filed status Report on 16-01-2014 confirming the statement made by Respondent No. 2. The Complainant did not dispute that her claim of GPF as well as her pension claim were settled. However, the Complainant made a statement that there was a delay in settlement of her claim for pension and claimed interest. The matter was therefore posted for hearing on 10-03-2014 on the limited question as to whether the Complainant can claim interest before this Commission on which date the Complainant filed an Affidavit along with several documents in support of her claim for interest. The Respondent No.1 filed reply opposing the Affidavit filed by the Complainant.
4. The Complainant in her Affidavit has stated amongst other things that there was a delay of thirteen months in paying her retirement benefits without delay on her part. She has further stated that only after filling the present complaint, she was given benefits as indicated below:
a) Rs.15,40,000/- towards GPF was paid on
05-10-2013.
b) Rs.7,52,350/- towards gratuity was paid on
30-10-2013.
c) Rs. 5,21,336/- towards commutation was paid
on 30-10-2013.
d) Rs. 3,09,827/- towards pension arrears was
paid on 30-10-2013.
e) Rs.1,67,189/- towards Leave Encashment was
paid on 20-12-2013.
5. We have perused the records of this case. We
have also heard the Parties.
6. Admittedly, there is a delay of 12 months and 5 days in payment of GPF amount. Similarly, there is a delay of 13 months in payment of gratuity amount, commutation of pension and arrears of pension. There is also delay of 12 months and 20 days in payment of Leave Encashment. The limited question for consideration is whether the Respondents have justified this delay in payment of terminal benefits to the Complainant.
the same and illegally deducted the contribution of the Complainant sent to the Directorate of Education (North Education Zone). It is further stated that the School Authority was requested to submit month-wise details of the account deposited to the GPF account of the Complainant for the period from July, 2007 to April, 2008 along with the contribution of the Management for the same period in order to consider the request of the Complainant for switch over from CPF to GPF (Pensionary Scheme). It is further stated that since the information sought for was not received by North Education Zone, Mapusa, reminder was sent to the Headmaster of the School to comply with the letter dated 12-05-2008. Once again the Assistant Accounts Officer, North Education Zone, Mapusa sent reminder to the Headmaster asking him to comply with the letter dated 12-05-2008. Again on 05-08-2009 a second reminder was sent to the Headmaster to deposit the Management share for the period from July, 2007 to April, 2008 to the CPF account of Mrs. Uma Umakant Chodankar and asked to submit proposal for switch over from CPF to GPF. The Respondent No. 1 reminded the School Authorities time and again to send the particulars and more particularly to pay the contribution towards the Management share to be credited to CPF account which was not paid by the School Authorities. The Joint Director of Accounts of the Respondent No. 1 wrote a letter dated 15-01-2013 to the School and requested for immediate compliance of the observation made by the Directorate of Accounts. On 09-05-2013 the Joint Director of Accounts, Directorate of Education informed the Headmaster of the School to deposit the amount of Management share of CPF in respect of the Complainant at the first instant in the Government Treasury and claim reimbursement if admissible and requested to settle the case at early date. By letter dated 13-08-2013, the Dy. Director of Education sent a reminder to the Headmaster and directed to submit Pension Case and GPF final payment case duly completed to the North Education Zone urgently. Again, the Director of Education vide letter dated 23-08-2013 and 26-08-2013 informed the Headmaster that the School has failed to submit GPF final payment and Pension case and warned to take serious action against the School and directed to submit the case for finalisation within five days from the issue of the letter failing which stern action as deemed fit as per law will be taken. According to Respondent No.1, the Headmaster of the School and School Management are responsible for delay in settlement of pensionary benefits to the Complainant.
7. The root cause for delay in payment of terminal benefits to the Complainant is on account of the fact that the Option Form to switch over CPF to GPF (Pensionary Scheme) of the Complainant was not properly forwarded by the Respondent No. 3. In para-5 of the reply, the Respondent No.1 has stated that the Respondent No. 3 made an error by sending the switch over Option Form on their own without there being Government approval for OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022 8. It is apparent from the records of this case that the Respondent No. 1 was repeatedly requesting the Respondent No. 3 to settle the pension case of the Complainant. In our view the delay in settlement of GPF claim and pension claim of the Complainant is on account of the lethargic attitude of the Respondent No. 3 and Respondent No. 4.
9.As far as GPF claim is concerned, the Complainant is entitled for interest on delayed payment as there was no fault on the part of the Complainant. As per Rule-11(4) of General Provident Fund (Central Services Rules, 1960) and C&A.G.'s decisions, the interest is to be allowed in case delay has occasioned by circumstances beyond the control of the subscriber and purely due to administrative reasons.
10. In so far as other terminal benefits are concerned, there is no specific provision for payment of interest on delayed payment. But then, the Authorities cannot be a silent spectator to such delay for which the Pensioner is not at fault. Non- payment of terminal benefits to the Complainant in time has a tendency of infringement of fundamental rights of the Complainant as envisaged under Article-21 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, human rights of the Complainant stand violated on account of unjustified delay in payment of terminal benefits to the Complainant in time. The principles of natural justice demand that the Complainant who is the victim for delay in payment of her legitimate dues should be compensated by awarding a reasonable compensation to be paid by the defaulting authorities. The amount of other terminal benefits, other than GPF amount works out to Rs. 17,50,702.00 (Rupees seventeen lakhs, fifty thousand seven hundred two only). In case the Complainant was paid the said amount in time and had the Complainant invested the amount in fixed deposit in any bank for a period of thirteen months, the Complainant would have earned interest more than Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) at the prevailing interest rates. We therefore feel that the compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) shall be appropriate and would meet the ends of justice.
11. For reasons mentioned above, we make the
following recommendations:
i) The Respondent No. 1 shall pay interest on the delayed payment of GPF within a period of one month as admissible under the Rules.
ii) Respondent No. 1 shall pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) to the Complainant on account of delay in payment of terminal benefits within a period of one month.
iii) Since the Government is not at fault for the delay in payment of other terminal benefits, such compensation shall be deducted from the grant in aid of the School and appropriated to the Government.
Date: 15-09-2014.
Place: Panaji-Goa.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
Justice P. K. Misra, A. D. Salkar, J. A. Keny, Chairperson, Member, Member, Goa Human Goa Human Goa Human Rights Rights Rights Commission. Commission. Commission.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022Goa State Mental Health Authority
Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behaviour
–– Notification
No. GSMHA/Review Board/01/2021-2022/3492 The composition of Review Board shall be in force with immediate effect from the date of Notification in the Official Gazette.
Sd/- Chairperson, Goa State Mental Health
Authority.
Bambolim, 8th February, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Personnel
__
Order
In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 73 read with Section 75(2) of Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (Central Act 10 of 2017) and Rule 18(3) of Mental Healthcare (Central Mental Health Authority and Mental Health Review Boards) Rules, 2018, the Government hereby constitute one Mental Health Review Board, for both the Districts (North & South) for the State of Goa, consisting the Chairperson and the following members:-
1. Mr. Ashley L. C. Noronha, — Chairperson.
Ex-District Judge
2. Dy. Collector & DRO, — Member.
Representative of the Collector, North Goa
3. Dr. Mukul M. S. Mahatme, — Member.
Medical Practitioner
4. Dr. Akshada Amonkar, — Member.
Psychiatrist
5. Smt. Sanjiwani M. Dessai, — Member.
Care-givers/NGO
6. Smt. Ketki Gadekar, NGO — Member.
The Chairperson and the members of the Board are entitled for honorarium and other allowances payable to, other terms and conditions of service of the Chairperson and the members of the Board shall be as per Mental Healthcare (Central Mental Health Authority and Mental Health Review Boards) Rules, 2018.
No. 6/2/2022-PER/268
Ref: Order No. 6/11/2010-PER(part)/2165 dated
30-08-2021.
Dr. Snehal P. Naik Goltekar, Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes-II, stands relieved with immediate effect to enable him to join on full time basis in the office of Chief Electoral Officer with immediate effect till completion of entire process pertaining to General Elections to Goa State Legislative Assembly, 2022 i.e. upto 12-03-2022 (Saturday).
Smt. Sarita Gadgil, Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes-I shall hold the charge of the post of Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes-II in addition to her own duties during the election process till Dr. Naik Goltekar resumes the duty.
Dr. Snehal P. Naik Goltekar shall continue to draw the salary from the post held by him prior to his appointment as Nodal Officer.
Vishal C. Kundaikar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 03rd February, 2022.
______
Order
No. 5/2/2017-PER/270
On the recommendation of the Goa Services Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order transfer
of the following Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with immediate effect:-
Sr. Name of the officer
No. & present post
1 2
1. Smt. Ashweta Redkar
Posted as
3
Assistant Chief
Deputy Director (Admn.), Technical Education Electoral Officer.
Shri Girish Sawant, Under Secretary, Home-II shall hold the charge of Deputy Director (Admn.), Technical
Education in addition to his own duties.
The officers shall complete handing over and taking over process with immediate effect and submit
compliance.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 46 10TH FEBRUARY, 2022This is issued with the approval of the Election Commission of India vide letter No. 154/Goa/2022-P.
Admn. dated 17-01-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Vishal C. Kundaikar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 3rd February, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Public Health
––
Certificate
No. 38/4/2016-I/PHD/224
Read: Government Order No. 38/4/2016-I/PHD/2519 dated 23-11-2021.
Certified that the character and antecedents of Dr. Von Richard Mascarenhas, Medical Officer (Group 'A' Gazetted), under Directorate of Health Services has been verified by the District Magistrate, South Goa, Margao vide letter No. 36/05/2019/MAG/243/15831 dated 29-12-2021, it is revealed that there is nothing adverse reported against him.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 7th February, 2022.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery, Government Printing Press, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 12.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—363/150—2/2022.