(cid:18)बहार(cid:18)बहार(cid:18)बहार(cid:18)बहार गजटगजटगजटगजट
असाधारण अंकअसाधारण अंकअसाधारण अंकअसाधारण अंक (cid:18)बहार सरकार (cid:26)ारा ूकािशत(cid:18)बहार सरकार (cid:26)ारा ूकािशत(cid:18)बहार सरकार (cid:26)ारा ूकािशत(cid:18)बहार सरकार (cid:26)ारा ूकािशत 7 7 7 7 आषाढआषाढआषाढआषाढ+ 1933193319331933 ((((शशशश0000))))
((((संसंसंसं0000 पपपपटना टना टना टना 301301301301) ) ) ) पपपपटनाटनाटनाटना,,,, मंगलमंगलमंगलमंगलवारवारवारवार,,,, 28282828 जून जून जून जून 2011201120112011 fuokZpu foHkkx
———
vf/klwpuk
13 twu 2011
सं॰ डी1-0021/2011-35353535— भारत निर्वाचन आयोग, नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना संख्या 82/बिहार/(1/2006)/2011 दिनांक 2 मई 2011 की अंग्र्रेजी व हिन्दी प्रति एवं निर्वाचन अर्जी संख्या 01/2006 में दिनांक 5 जनवरी 2011 को माननीय उच्च न्यायालय, पटना द्वारा पारित आदेष/निर्णय को सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए प्रकाषित किया जाता है।
बिहार-राज्यपाल के आदेष से, आर0 के0 प्रसाद, विषेश कार्य पदाधिकारी
-सह-उप मुख्य निर्वाचन पदाधिकारी, बिहार
-सह-सरकार के उप-सचिव।(cid:18)बहार गजट (असाधारण), 28 जून 2011 2 भारत निर्वाचन आयोग ——— अधिसूचना निर्वाचन सदन, अषोक रोड, नई दिल्ली-110001, तारीख 2 मई, 2011/12 वैषाख, 1933 (षक) सं0 82/बिहार/(1/2006)/2011—लोक प्रतिनिधित्व अधिनियम, 1951 (1951 का 43) की धारा 106 के अनुसरण में, निर्वाचन आयोग एतद्द्वारा निर्वाचन अर्जी सं0 1/2006 में दिये गये उच्च न्यायालय, पटना के तारीख 5 जनवरी, 2011 के आदेष को प्रकाषित करता है।
आदेष से, के0 अजय कुमार, सचिव, भारत निर्वाचन आयोग ।
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA ——— NOTIFICATION Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001, Dated 2nd May 2011/12 Vaisakha, 1933(Saka) No.82/BR(1/2006)/2011—In pursuance of Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission hereby published Order dated the 5th January, 2011 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Election Petition No. 1 of 2006.
By Order, K. AJAY KUMAR, Secretary, Election Commission of India.
——— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA E.P. No. 1 of 2006 VIJAY KUMAR SINHA Versus FULENA SINGH & ORS.
129/ 05/01/2011
The allegations in this election petition related to double voting only questioning the winning of the respondent on that factual ground. The election petition did not raise any allegations of corrupt practice. Whether double voting took place or not was primarily a question of pure fact. Now that the fresh election to the Assembly have been held, the issue becomes academic and the election petition infructuous. It may only be noticed that both the parties to the election petition contested the recent Assembly Elections. The fact that the petitioner may have won the recent Assembly Elections and the respondent may have lost, shall not enthuse fresh life to the present election petition. The Courts do not decide academic issues unless they raise far more important and general questions of law which may keep re-surfacing in cases frequently, more than one. It has already been noticed that the controversy here was purely factual between the two parties. The Assembly having been dissolved and fresh constitution having been done, the election petition is held to be infructuous. It is accordingly disposed off.
NAVIN SINHA, J.
————
अधी.क, सिचवालय मुिणालय,