This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं डी. एल-33001/ 99

REGISTERED NO. D. L -33001 /.99 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

सं० 2 ]

नई दिल्ली, शनिबार , जनवरी 11, 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

NEW DELHI , SATURDAY , JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

No. 2 ]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- Section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा आरी किए गए सांविधिक आवेश और अधिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2003

का.आ. 6.6.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम ,1946 ( 1946 का अधिनयम संः 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं . एचडी -173 पीसीआर 2002 दिनांक 30-9-2002 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहर्मात से सर्वश्री बी . एम . नाटिकर , दूरसंचार तकनीकी सहायक, मुड्डेबिहाल और ए . के . मक्तेदार, वरिष्ठ तकनीकी पर्यवेक्षक (ओ ) , मुड्डेबिहाल , बंगलोर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 की धारा 120-बी सपठित धारा 420 और भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 की धारा 13 089-1/2002-1 ( 1 ) ( डी ) के अधीन अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उ‌द्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधि कारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है।।

[सं. 228/82/ 2002-ए वी डी-II (1) ]

भाष्कर खुल्दै , निदेशक MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training ) New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2003

S.O. 66. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1.) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1940 (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 173 PCR 2002 dated 30-9-2002 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi. Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for

(149) 150 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

investigation of offences against S/ Shri B. M. Natikar Tele- com Technical Assistant , Muddebihal and A. K. Maktedar Senior Technical Supervisor ( O ) , Muddebihal and any other public servants or persons under Section 120- B read with . 420 of the Indian Penal code, 1850 and Section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228 / 82 / 2002 -AVD - II ( i ) ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2003

का . आ . 67.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य मरकार की अधिसूचना सं . एचडी 181 पीसीग्रार 2002 दिनांक 7-11-2002 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहर्गात से श्री आर . शंकरप्पा , संब डिविजनल इंजीनियर , केवल कन्सट्रक्शन, वीएसएनएल, मल्लेश्वरम , बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सर्पाटत धारा 13 ( 1) ( ई ) के अधीन अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक में संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों में उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधीं के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं. 228/ 82/ 2002-एवीडी- II ( ii ) ]

[PART 11 - SEC . 3 (ii) ] राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं . एचडी 182 पीसीआर 2002 दिनांक 7-11-2002 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री पी . मल्लिकार्जुन, टेलीफोन मैकेनिक, केबल कन्सट्रक्शन, बीएसएनएल , मल्लेश्वरम, बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 की धारा 13 ( 2) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1. ) ( ई ) के अधीन अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधि- कारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं. 228/ 82/2002-एवीडी-II ( iii ) ]

भाष्कर खुल्बे , निदेशक New Delhi , the 2nd January , 2003

S.O. 68. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 182 PCR 2002 dated 7-11-2002 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences against Shri P. Mallikarajuna , Tole phone Mechanic Cable Construction , B.S.N.L. , Malleswaram . Barngalore and any other public servants or persons under Section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( e ) of Prevention of Corrup- tion Act , 1988 and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228/82/2002 -AVD - II ( iii ) ]

BHASKAR KHULBE, Director नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2003

भाष्कर खुल्बे , निदेशक

New Delhi . the 2nd Jannary , 2003

S.O. 67. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 181 PCR 2002 dated 7-11-2002 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the inembers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences against Shri R. Shankarappa . Sub Divisional Engineer Cable Construction , B.S.N.L. , Malles- waram, Bangalore and any other public servants or persons under Section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( e ) of Prevention of Cerreption Act, 1988 and attempts , abetments and conspi- racies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence effences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts . or

[No. 228 /82 / 2002 - AVD - II ( ii ) ]

BHASKAR KHULBE , Director

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ . 68. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं . 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदक्त शक्तियों का प्रक्षोग करते हुए कर्नाटक का. ग्रा . 69.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं . एचडी 226 पीसीआर 2002 दिनांक 24 दिसम्बर , 2002 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री एस . एस . स्वामी, एक्जी- क्यूटिव, एचएमटी लि., बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( ई) के अधीन अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक मे संबंधित अथबा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षड- यंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भुत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं.

151

भारत का राजपत्र जनवरी 11, 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[भाग II-खड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 2nd January , 2003

S.O. 69. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 226 . PCR 2002 dated 24th December , 2002, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whoc of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences against Shri S. S. Swamy, Exe- cutive, HMT Ltd. , Bangalore and any other public servants or persons punishable under Section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( e ) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 and attempts , abet- ments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228 /83 / 2002 -AVD - 11 ] BHASKAR KHULBE , Director वित्त एवं कम्पनी कार्य मंत्रालय (राजस्व विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 70--केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा राजस्व विभाग के अधीन केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय को, जिसके कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है:--

केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क उप आयुक्त का कार्यालय, आर-2/1 नेहरू कालोनी, देहरादून

[फा.सं. 11011/3/ 2002- हिन्दी-2] प्रशांत मेहता, संयुक्त सचिव (राजस्व) MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND COMPANY AFFAIRS (Department of Revenue ) New Delhi , the 8th January , 2003

S.O. 70. In pursuance of sub - rule ( 4) of rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purposes of the Union ) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the Board of Central Excise & Customs , Department of Revenue the Staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi .

Office of the Dy . Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs , R-2/ 1 Nehru Colony , Dehradun .

[F. No. 11011 /3 /2002 -Hindi - 2] PRASHANT MEHTA , Jt. Secy . ( Revenue ) स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ( स्वास्थ्य विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2002- का. आ. 71.-- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियर, 1956 ( 1956 का. 102) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में और बिहार सरकार से परामर्श करके डा . एस . के. सिन्हा को 17 दिसम्बर , 2002 से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया गया है । अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 को उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसनण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 को अधिसूचना सं . का . आ . 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-- उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अधीन मनोनोत" शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या 13 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रति- स्थापित की जाएंगी अर्थात्:---

" 13. डा. एस . के. सिन्हा, बिहार सरकार " क्वार्टर नं . बी/ 2 , सेक्टर डी/ 1 , कंकड़बाग, पटना-800020 ( बिहार ) [स. वी 11013/1/ 2002 -एम ई ( नोति- Ⅰ ) ] पो . जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health)

New Delhi , the 16th December , 2002 S. O. 71. Whereas the Central Government , in pursuance of clause (a) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of setion 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and in consultation with the Government of Bihar have nominated Dr. S. K. Sinha to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from 17th December, 2002.

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of Sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government, hereby makes the follow- ing further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S. O. 138 , dated the 9th January , 1960, namely;

In the said notification , under the heading , 'Nominated under clause ( a) of Sub - section (1) of section 3 ' , for serial number 13 and the entries 152

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

thereto , the following serial number and entries shall be substituted , namely :-

" 13. Dr. S. K. Sinha, Govt . of Bihar " House No. B / 2 , Sector D/ 1 , Kankarbagh, Patna - 800020 ( Bihar)

[No. V- 11013 / 1 / 2002 - ME ( Policy- 1 ) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2002 का. ग्रा. 72.-- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (क ) के अनुसरण में और अरुणा- चल प्रदेश सरकार से परामर्श करके डा . जी. योमचाई , निदेशक , स्वास्थ्य सेवाएं, अरूणाचल प्रदेश सरकार को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया गया है ।

अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना सं . का . आ . में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करतो है, अर्थात्:-- 138 उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अधीन मनोनीत" शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत निम्न- लिखित क्रम संख्या 24 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रति- स्थापित की जाएंगी अर्थात्:

" 44. डा . जो. योमचाई ,

अरुणाचल प्रदेश सरकार" क्वार्टर नं . 30 , टाइप 5 , डी सेक्टर, नाहरलागुन-791110 , अम्णाचल प्रदेश

[संख्याबी.-11013 /1/ 2002-एम ई (नीति-1 ) ] पो. जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th December , 2002 S. O. 72.-Whereas the Central Goverment , in pursuance of clause ( a) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and in consul- tation with the Government of Arunachal Pradesh have nominated Dr. G. Yomchai , Director of Health Services , Govt . of Arunachal Pradesh to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue notification . of this Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of Sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S. O. 138 , dated the 9th January , 1960, namely ;

In the said notification , under the heading , 'Nominated under clause ( a) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 ' , for serial number 24 and the entries relating thereto , the following serial number and entries shall be substituted , namely : -

Government of Arunachal Pradesh " "24. Dr. G. Yomchai , Qtr . No. 30, Type V ,

'D' Sector , Naharlagun - 791110

Arunachal Pradesh

[No. V- 11013/ 1/ 2002 - ME ( Policy - I ) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ . 73--: भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1,956 ( 1956का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में डा . गजेन्द्र किशोर ठाकुर , सह प्रोफेसर, एस . के . मेडिकल कालेज , बाबासाहेब भीम राव अम्बेडकर बिहार विश्वविद्यालय, मुजफ्फरपुर को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से बाबा साहेब भीम राव अम्बेडकर बिहार विश्वविद्यालय के सीनट द्वारा भारतीय आयुबिज्ञान परिषद् का सदस्य निर्वाचित किया गया है । अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) के उपबन्ध के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना सं . का . आ . 138 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में "धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अधीन निर्वार्वाचत " शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत क्रम संख्या 22 तथा उससे संबद्ध प्रविष्टयों के स्थान पर निम्न- लिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी अर्थात:--

बाबा साहेब भीम राव अम्बेडकर बिहार विश्व- विद्यालय"

" 22 डा . गजेन्द्र किशोर ठाकुर , शिव एक्स-रे, महेश बाबूचौक, पो.आ. एम.आई.टी. , मुजफ्फरपुर -842003

[फा. संख्या वी-11013/ 2/ 2002-एम. ई . (नीति- Ⅰ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण, अबर सचिव पाद टिप्पण: मुख्य अधिसूचना भारत के राजपत्त्र का . आ. सं 138 में दिनांक 9-1-1960 को प्रकाशित की गई थी ।

র [भाग II-खड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th December , 2002 S. O. 73.- Whereas in pursuance of clause (b) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Dr. Gajendra Kishore Thakur , Associate Pro- fessor , S. K. Medical College , Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University , Muzaffarpur has been elected by the Senate of the Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of Sub -section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S. O. 138 , dated the 9th January , 1960 , namely :-

153

भारत का राजपत्न: जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

In the said Notification , under the heading, 'Elected under clause ( b) of Sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 , for serial number 22 and the entries relating thereto the following entries shall be substituted , namely :-

"22. Dr. Gajendra Kishore Thakur Babasaheb Shiva X-Ray, Mahesh Babu Chowk . P.O. MIT, Muzaffarpur -842003 Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University" [No. V - 11013 / 2/ 2002 - ME ( Policy- I ) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy .

Footnote : The Principal notification was publ- lished in the Gazette of India , vide S. O. 138 dated 9-1-1960 .

नई दिल्ली , 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ. 74.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् के परामर्श के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनयम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:

उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " हिमाचल प्रदेश विश्वविद्यालय " के पश्चात " विश्वविद्यालय या आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान" के शीर्षक के अधीन और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के " मान्यताप्राप्त आयुविज्ञान अर्हता " और " संक्षिप्ताक्षर" शीर्षक के अधीन को क्रमशः निम्न प्रकार से रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्:

विश्वविद्यालय या आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान मान्यता प्राप्त आयुविज्ञान अर्हता

"एच.एन.बी. गढ़वाल विश्वविद्यालय बैचलर ऑफ मेडिसन एंड बैचलर ऑफ सर्जरी (यह अर्हता तभी मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हता होगी जब हिमालयन इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइंसेज, देहरादून में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों को मार्च, 2001 में या उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो । ) "

संक्षिप्ताक्षर

एम.बी.बी.एस.

[संवी. - 11015/ 7/ 2002- एम. ई. ( नीति-Ⅰ) ]

पी.जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S. O. 74.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 2) of Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) , the Central Government after consultation with the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

In the said Firstt Schedule, after " Himachal Pradesh University " under the heading " University or Medical Institution " and the entries relating thereto under the headings " Recognised Medical Qualifications ' [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 154 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924 and "Abbreviation " the following shall respectively be inserted , namely :-

Abbreviation

Recognised Medical Qualification

M.B.B.S.

University or Medical Institution "H.N.B. Garhwal University

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery .

(This quatification shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted in or after March , 2002 in respect of students being trained at Himalyan Institute of Medical Sciences , Dehradun)".

[ No. V. 11015/ 7 / 2002 - ME ( Policy- I ) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. या . 75.-दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 को उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:

उक्त अनुमूवो के भाग-1 में पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय , पांडिचेरी की क्रम संख्या 44 और उसते संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के सामने निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी, अर्थात्:--

दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात

44. पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय , पांडिचेरी

(i) एम डी एस (प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स ) पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय , पांडिचेरी ।

( ii) एम डी एस ( मुख विकृति विज्ञान) पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय , पांडिचेरी । महात्मा गांधी डेंटल कालेज एवं अस्पताल , पांडिचेरी के एमडीएस छात्रों के संबंध में निम्न- लिखित दन्त चिकित्सा अर्हता सभी एक मान्यता- प्राप्त अर्हता होगी जब यह 15 जुलाई, 2002 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो:--

(i) एम डी एस ( प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स)

(iii) एम डी एस ( ओरल और मैक्सिलोफे- सियल सर्जरी ) पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय, पांडिचेरी ।

(ii) एमडी एस ( मुख विकृति विज्ञान)

(iii) एम डी एस ( ओरल और मैक्सिलोफेसियल

सर्जरी

[सं. वी-12018/ 27/ 2002-पी एम एस] एस . के. राव, निदेशक ( एमई)

New Delhi, the 30th December , 2002

S. O. 75 .-- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India hereby makes the following amendments in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-

In Part- 1 of the Schedule against Serial Number 44 of the Pondicherry University , Pondichery and the entries relating thereto , the following entries shall be added, namely:---

Master of Dental Surgery

44. Pondicherry University , Pondicherry

( i) MDS (Prosthodontics) Pondicherry University , Pondicherry .

(ii) MDS ( Oral Pathology ) Pondicherry University , Pondicherry .

The following dental quali- cations shall be recognized qualifications in respect of MDS students of Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital , Pondicherry if granted on or after 15th July, 2002 .: (i ) MDS ( Prosthodontics)

(iii ) MDS ( Oral & Maxillo-

facial Surgery )

Pondicherry University , Pondicherry.

(ii ) MDS (Oral Pathology) ( iii) MDS ( Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery)

[No. V. - 12018 / 27/ 2002 - PMS ] S. K. RAO , Director (ME) 155

भारत का राजपत्त्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पोष 21, 1924

[भाग II--खड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ . 76.--दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनयम की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में निलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:---

उक्त अनुसूची के भाग-1 में राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विविद्यालय , बेंगलूर की क्रम संख्या 47 और उससे संबंधित प्रर्वािष्टयों के सामने निम्नलिखित विष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी, अर्थात्:--

एम डी एस (पेडोडोंटिक्स )

47. राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विविद्यालय , बेंगलूर ।

राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बेंगलूर ।

दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात येनेपोया डेंटल कालेज, मंगलौर के एमडीएस छात्रों के संबंध में निम्नलिखित दन्त चिकित्सा अर्हता तभी एक मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हता होगी जब यह 22/ 23-3-2002 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो:--

एम डी एस (पेडोडोंटिक्स )

[संख्याबी-12018/14/ 2002-पी एम एस]

एस. के . राव, निदेशक ( एमई) New Delhi , the 30th December , 2002

S.O. 76. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :

In Part- 1 of the Schedule against Serial Number 47 of Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , Bangalore and the entries relating thereto , the following entries shall be added, namely : --

MDS ( Pedodontics)

47. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore.

Rajiv Gandhi University Health Sciences , Bangalore . of

Master of Dental Surgery The following dental quali- fications sha !! be recognized qualifications in respect of MDS students of Yenepoya Dental College , Mangalore if granted on or after 22/ 23-3-2002 : MDS (Pedodontics)

[No. V. - 2018/ 14/2002- PMS]

S. K. RAO, Director (ME)

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ . 77 .-- दन्त चिकित्सक अर्धानयम, 1948 (1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा उक्त अर्धािनयम कीअनुसूची के भाग-1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्-- 156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11. 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( 1 ) ]

उक्त अनुसूची के भाग-1 में राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बेंगलूर की क्रम संख्या 47 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के सामने निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी, अर्थात्:-

दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात 47. राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बेंगलूर

एचकेईएस श्री निर्जालगप्पा डेंटल विज्ञान एवं अनु- संधान संस्थान , गलबर्गा के एमडीएस छात्रों के संबंध में निम्नलिखित दन्त चिकित्सा अर्हता तभी एक मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हता होगी जब यह 29 जलाई , 2002 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो:--

एम डी एस (प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स) एम डी एस (प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स)

राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बेंगलुर ।

[संख्यावी-12018/ 28/2002-पी एम एस] एस . के . राव , निदेशक ( एमई )

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2002

S. O. 77. -In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely

In Part - I of the Schedule against Serial Number 47 of Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , Bangalore and the entries relating thereto, the following entries shall be added , namely :---

Master of Dental Surgery

47. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore .

The following dental qualifications

shall be recognized qualifications in respect of MDS students of HKES' Sri Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Secinces and Research , Gulbarga if granted on or after

29th July , 2002 :

MDS ( Prosthodontics) Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences , Bangalore.

MDS ( Prosthodontics)

शहरी विकास और गरीबी उपशमन मंत्रालय

( शहरी विकास विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ . 78.- यह एतद्वारा अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि श्री गुलाम नबी आजाद को राज्य सभा द्वारा 30-11-2002 मे सदस्य के रूप में पुनः चुने जाने के पश्चात् उन्हें राजघाट समाधि समिति अधिनियम, 1951 ( 1951 का 41) की धारा ( 4) की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( घ ) के अनुसार राजघाट समाधि समिति के सदस्य के रूप में भी पुनः चुन लिया गया है ।

[सं. 25011/ 7/ 95- डब्ल्यू 2]

एस. मुखर्जी, अवर सचिव

[No. V. - 12018 / 28 / 2002 - PMS ] S. K. RAO , Director ( ME) MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION

(Department of Urban Development) New Delhi , the 30th December , 2002 S.O. 78. It is hereby notified that Shri Ghulam Nabi Azad, after his re- election as member by the Rajya Sabha w.e.f. 30-11-2002. has also been re - elected as member of the Raj- ghat Samadhi Committee in accordance with the Clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Rajghat Samadhi Committee Act, 1951 (41 of 1951) .

[No. 25011 / 7 / 95 - W2] S. MUKHERJEE , Under Secy.

157 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कोयला और खान मंत्रालय

(कोयला विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 79.-- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है, कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारकं क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( i ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. सी- 1 ( ई ) III / जेजेएमआर/ 695-0502 , तारीख 27 मई , 2002 का निरीक्षण वेस्टर्न कोलफीड्स लिमिटेड (राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर 440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कलेक्टर, चंद्रपुर (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा (7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिन के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी /विभागाध्यक्ष (राजस्व) वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर 440 001 (महाराष्ट्र) को भेज सकेंगे ।

अनुसूची

जूना कुनाडा ओ/ सी खंड

माजरी क्षेत्र

जिला चंद्रपुर (महाराष्ट्र)

(रेखांक सं.सी - 1 ( ई) III /जेजेएमआर/ 695-0502 तारीख 27 मई, 2002)

ग्राम का नाम

तहसील जिला

टिप्पणी

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में

क्रम सं.

पटवारी सर्किल संख्या

भाग

210.00

चंद्रपुर

भद्रावती

कुनाडा

कुल क्षेत्रः- 210.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग)

या

518.91 एकड़ (लगभग)

3889G1/2002-2

F [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

सीमा वर्णनः

क्र खः रेखा बिन्दु ' क' से आरम्भ होती है और ग्राम कुनाडा से होती हुए वर्धा नदी के उत्तरी एवं पूर्वी किनारों के साथ - साथ होती हुए जाती है और बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग-घ-ड.: रेखा ग्राम कुनाडा से होते हुए जाती है और बिन्दु 'ड. ' पर मिलती है।

ड.-च-छः रेखा ग्राम कुनाडा से होते हुए जाती है और बिन्दु ' छ' पर मिलती है । छ कः रेखा ग्राम कुनाडा से होते हुए जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं.- 43015/8/2002- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू]

संजय बहादुर, उप सचिव

Ministry of Coal andMines

(Department of Coal)

NewDelhi, the 3rd January, 2003

S. O. 79.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the schedule hereto annexed ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

The plan bearing No. C- 1 (E ) III/ JJMR/ 695-0502 dated the 27th May, 2002 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department ) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 (Maharashtra) or in the office of the Collector, Chandrapur (Maharashtra) or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata .

All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification may deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub - section (7) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer- in- Charge/Head of the Department (Revenue) , Western Coalfields Limited, Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur 440 001 (Maharashtra) within ninety days from the date of publication ofthis notification.

159 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोष 21 , 1924

[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Schedule

Juna Kunada O/C Block

MajriAren

District Chandrapur (Maharashtra)

( Plan No. C- 1 (E) III/ JJMR/ 695-0502 dated the 27th May, 2002).

Remarks

District

Tahsil

Area in hectares

Name of village

Serial Number

Patwari circle number

Part

210: 00

Bhadrawati Chandrapur

Kunada

210: 00 hectares

Total area:

(approximately)

ог

518.97 acres (approximately) Boundary description : -

A - B : Line starts from point ' A' and passes through village Kunada along the Northern and Eastern Bank of Wardha River and meets at point "B".

B-C-D-E: Line passes through village Kunada and meets at point 'E'.

E-F -G :

Line passes through village Kunada and meets at point "G

G- A : Line passes through village Kunada and meets at starting point "A".

[No: -40015/8/2002-PRIW] SANJAY BAHADUR, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2009

का. आ. 80.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है, कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और बिकास) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 4 की उपधारा (i) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. सी- 1 (ई) मा /जेजेएमआर/ 696-0502, तारीख 27 मई, 2002 का निरीक्षण वेस्टर्न कोलफीड्स लिमिटेड (राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर 440001 ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कलेक्टर, चंद्रपुर (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कौयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;

160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा (7) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिन के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी /विभागाध्यक्ष (राजस्व) वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर 440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) परिदत्त कर सकेंगे ।

अनुसूची

एकोणा ओ/ सी खंड

माजरी क्षेत्र

जिला चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र)

(रेखांक सं.सी - 1 (ई) III /जेजेएमआर/696-0502 तारीख 27 मई, 2002)

ग्राम का नाम

तहसील जिला

टिप्पणी

क्रम सं.

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में

पटवारी सर्किल संख्या

वरोरा

एकोणा

भाग

चंद्रपुर 472.500

2. मार्डा

13 वरोरा

भाग

708.750

चंद्रपुर

3. वनोजा

11 वरोरा

813.750 भाग

चंद्रपुर

वरोरा

15 वरोरा

भाग

197.750

चंद्रपुर

5. खांजी

16 वरोरा चंद्रपुर 217.000 भाग

वरोरा

मोहबाला

भाग

189.060

चंद्रपुर

वरोरा

नगारा (रीठ)

चंद्रपुर 198.790 सम्पूर्ण

8. नायदेव

10 वरोरा

भाग

119.000

चंद्रपुर

10 वरोरा

183.400 भाग

चरूर (खटी)

चंद्रपुर

कुल क्षेत्रः- 3100.00 हेक्टर (लगभग )

या

7660.10 एकड़ (लगभग)

सीमा वर्णनः

क -खः रेखा बिन्दु ' क ' से आरम्भ होती है और ग्राम मार्डा, वनोजा और वरोरा से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग : रेखां ग्राम वरोरा से होती हुई जाती है फिर ग्राम खांजी और मोहबाला से होती हुई आगे बढ़ती है और बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

ग - घः रेखा ग्राम मोहबाला से होती हुई जाती है फिर ग्राम नायदेव, चरूर( खटी) से होती हुई आगे बढ़ती है और बिन्दु 'घ ' पर मिलती है । 161

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोप 21 , 1924

[ भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

घ - ड. रेखा ग्राम चरूर (खटी) से होती हुई जाती है फिर ग्राम एकोणा से होती हुई आगे बढ़ती है और बिन्दु 'ड' पर मिलती है ।

ड.- कः रेखा ग्राम एकोणा से होती हुए जाती है और वर्धा नदी के पूर्वी तट के साथ- साथ जाती है फिर ग्राम मार्डा से होकर आगे बढ़ती है तथा वर्धा नदी के पूर्वी तट के साथ- साथ जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु 'कं पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. -43015/11/2002- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू]

संजय बहादुर, उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd January , 2003

S: O. 80.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the schedule hereto annexed ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein ;

The plan bearing No. C- 1 (E ) II/JJMR/ 696-0502 dated the 27th May , 2002 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department ) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 (Maharashtra ) or in the office of the Collector, Chandrapur ( Maharashtra) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata.

All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub- section (7) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer- in -Charge/Head of the Department ( Revenue ) , Western Coalfields Limited, Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 ( Maharashtra) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

Schedule

Yekona O /C Block ,

MajriArea

District Chandrapur ( Maharashtra)

( Plan No. C - 1 ( E ) III / JJMR/ 696-0502 dated the 27th May, 2002) .

Tahsil

Remarks District

Serial Number

Name of village

Patwari circle number 1

11 Yekona

Area in hectares

Part

472,500

Warora Chandrapur

13 2 Marda

Part

708.750

Warora Chandrapur

Part

813.750

Warora Chandrapur

Wanoja

15 Warora

197.750

Part

Warora Chandrapur

217.000

Part

Warora Chandrapur

Khanji

17 6

189.060

Part

Warora Chandrapur

Mohbala

10 7

Full

198.790

Warora Chandrapur

Nagara (Reeth )

Part

119.000

Warora Chandrapur

Naideo

10 9

Part

183.400

Warora Chandrapur

Charur (Khati )

Boundary description : -

A- B :

3100.000 hectares

Total area :

(approximately)

ог

7660.10 acres ( approximately )

Line starts from point ' A ' and passes through villages Marda, Wanoja and Warora and meets at point ' B' .

B - C : Line passes through village Warora , then proceeds through villages Khanji and Mohbala and meets at point ' C' .

C-D : Line passes through village Mohbala , then proceeds through villages Naideo , Charur (Khati ) and meets at point 'D' .

D - E : Line passes through village Charur (Khati ) , then proceeds through village Yekona and meets at point ' E' .

E -A

Line passes through village Yekona and passes along the eastern bank of Wardha River, then proceeds through village Marda and passes along the eastern bank o Wardha River and meets at starting point 'A'.

[No.43015 11.2002 - PRIW |

SANJAY BAHADUR . Dy . Seey .

163

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 81. - केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में नीचे अनुसूची के स्तंभ 1 में उल्लिखित प्राधिकारी को उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 3 की तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में उल्लिखित क्षेत्र के भीतर उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

अनुसूची

राज्य क्षेत्रीय अधिकारित्ता

पता

व्यक्तिका नाम

(3)

(2)

(1)

संपूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य। श्री एस.एस. पट्टन शेट्टी , विशेष उपायुक्त

गैस अथॉरिटी ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड फ़्लैट सं. 101 , लाईट हाउस , मोतीशाम कॉम्पलैक्स , कांडोमिनियम, एल.एच.एच. रोड, मंगलौर - 575 001 ( कर्नाटक)

[फा. सं. एल.- 14014/48/2002- जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 1st January , 2003

S. O.81.- In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby authorize the authority mentioned in column - 1 of the Schedule below to perform the functions of Competent Authority under the said act within the area mentioned in the corresponding entry in the column 3 of the saidschedule.

Schedule

Address

Name of the persons

Territorial Jurisdiction Shri S.S. Pattanashetti ,

The whole state of Karnataka.

Special Deputy Commissioner

Gas Authority of India Ltd. , Flat No. 101 , Light House, Motisham Complex , Condominium LHH Road , Mangalore- 575 001 (Karnataka).

[No. L- 14014/48/2002-G.P.J SWAMY SINGH , Director PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | 164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 82.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन ( सी.ओ.टी.) से पंजाब राज्य में भटिण्डा तक मुन्द्रा - भटिंडा पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , भारत के राजपत्र भाग -2 , खंड 3 ,उपखंड ( ii) तारीख 23 फरवरी , 2002 मे प्रकाशित भारत सरकार की पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं . का आ. 572 तारीख 22 फरवरी, 2002 द्वारा कतिपय भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण की थी;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में बर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा वी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में, श्री ए. आर . चौधरी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन, पंजाब रिफाइनरी परियोजना , गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी) , एल.पी.जी. बॉटलिंग संयन्त्र, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, भगत की कोठी, जोधपुर 342005 को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । (भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोप 21 , 1924

165

अनुसूची

बहसील: खींवस्सार

जिला: नागौर

राज्य : राजस्थान गाँव कर नाम मला नं.

हिस्सा क्रमांक

ROU क्षेत्रफल सं.

बाधा

स्वा 1

काटियों

345 मीन

11 286

01 2

जगसमपुरा

04 3 बेनीवालो की दाणी 1053

[फा. स. आर -31015/46/01- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 6th January, 2003

S. O. 82. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab, through Mundra - Bathinda pipeline, a pipeline should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);

Andwhereas the Central Government has declared its intention to acquire the right of user in certain lands by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 572 dated the 22 February, 2002, published in Part II , Section 3, Sub-section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 23rd February ,2002:

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU ) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri A.R.CHAUDHARY, Competent Authority, Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline , Punjab Refinery Project, Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleurn Corporation Limited) . L.P.G. Bottling Plant, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bhagat Ki Kothi , Jodhpur -342005 .

3889 G1/2002-3 PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

166

SCHEDULE

State : Rajasthan

District: Nagaur

ROU -Area Tehsil : Khinwsar

PartIfAny

Khasra No.

Biswa Name of Village

Biga

11 1

Min

345

Kantiya

286

Jagrampura

1053

Beniwalon Ki Dhani

[No. R-31015/46/01 -O.R. -II]

HARISH KUMAR. Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 83.- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मन्त्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 572 तारीख 22 फरवरी 2002. जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग -2, खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 23 फरवरी , 2002 के पृष्ठ 1941 से पृष्ठ 1951 पर प्रकाशित की गई थी , में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में:-

पृष्ठ 1942 पर, स्तंभ 1 में "गाँव "बेनीवालों की ढाणी"

(क)

(i ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1025" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल '4-07", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "4-09" , रखा जाएगा ;

(ii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1048", के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "3-01 ", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "3-02" , रखा जाएगा ;

(iii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1051 " , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल ' 1-01 ", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-02", रखा जाएगा ;

(iv) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1093" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-02 " , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 0-10", रखा जाएगा ; पृष्ठ 1943 पर. स्तंभ 1 में "गाँव "बेनीवालों की ढाणी"

(v) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1091 " , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 0-16" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-01 ", रखा जाएगा ;-

(vi) ت स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1107", के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल 0-02". के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-09" , रखा जाएगा ;

(vii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1111 " , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "111 ", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-12" , रखा जाएगा ;

(viii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1077 ", के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल 0-09" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-18 " , रखा जाएगा ;

(ix) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1179" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-03 ", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-07", रखा जाएगा ;

(x) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1178" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "2-01 ", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "2-18", रखा जाएगा ;

(xi) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 1268 " , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-16", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "2-02", रखा जाएगा ;

पृष्ठ 1943 पर, स्तंभ 1 में " गाँव " मधाणियां की ढाणी"

(ख)

(i) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 2592 " , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-15", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "4-09" , रखा जाएगा ;

(ii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "2594" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "6-10" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "6-16", रखा जाएगा ;

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पोप 21 , 1924

167 (ग) पृष्ठ 1945 पर, रतंग 1 में गॉव " कॉटिया"

(i ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "284", के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "2-11", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "2-13", रखा जाएगा (ii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "290" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-18 " , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-00 " , रखा जाएगा (iii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "293" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-07 " , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-12" , रखा जाएगा , ( iv) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या"295" ,के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-12", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "1-14" , रखा जाएगा:

(v) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "296" ,के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-10", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-11 " , रखा जाएगा ;

(vi ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या."384" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 0-14" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-15" , रखा जाएंगा (vii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या"387 " ,के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "3-14" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 3-16", रखा जाएगा:

(घ) पृष्ठ 1946 पर, स्तंभ 1 में गाँव " जगरामपुरा"

(i ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या"22" ,के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-15" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-16" , रखा जाएगा (ii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "23" ,के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-08", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-09 ", रखा जाएंगा ;

(iii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या. "24" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-17" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-18" , रखा जाएगा ( iv ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "27", के सागने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-11 " , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-12", रखा जाऐगा । (v) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या. "31 ", के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "2-07" ,के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "2-12" , रखा जाएंगा ;

पृष्ठ 1948 पर, स्तंभ 1 में गॉव " गाडपुरा" (3)

(i )स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या." 1320" ,के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-11 ", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 1-13" , रखा जाएगा;

(च) पृष्ठ 1948 पर, स्तंभ 1 में गाँव " शिवपुरा"

(i ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या" 1295",के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "3-00" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 3-04", रखा जारंगा (ii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या." 1308" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-13", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 2-01 " , रखा जाएगा (छ) पृष्ठ 1949 पर, स्तंभ 1 में गाँव "अणदोलाव"

(i ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या "525" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "0-13" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "0-16", रखा जाएगा (ii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या " 590" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल " 1-01 " , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "2-10", रखा जाएगां (ज) पृष्ठ 1949 पर, रतंभ 1 में गाँव " सुखोलाव"

(i ) रत्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या."407", के सामने रतंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "3-14", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "4-11 ", रखा जाएगा ;

(ii ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या." 406" , के सामने स्तंभ में क्षेत्रफल "0-04", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल " 0-05", रखा जाएगा:

168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SBC . 3 (H)] (झ) पृष्ठ 1950 पर, स्तभ 1 4 गाँव " चारणीसरा'

(i ) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या" 235",के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "2-00", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "2-04", रखा जाएगा;

(ण) पृष्ठ 1951 पर, स्तंभ 1 में गॉव " खड़काली "

(i) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या."841" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "4-02" , के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "4-04", रखा जागा;

(ii) स्तंभ 2 के सर्वेक्षण संख्या."843" , के सामने स्तंभ 4 में क्षेत्रफल "5-04", के स्थान पर क्षेत्रफल "5-06" , रखा जान्देगा

[फा. सं. आर-31015/46/01-ओ.आर- II ] हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th January, 2003

S. O. 83. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962, (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , number S.O. 572 , dated 22nd February, 2002, published at pages 1951 to 1960 , in Part II , section 3, sub - section ( ii ) , of the Gazette of India, dated the 23rd February, 2002 , namely: -

In Schedule to the said notification -

(A) at page 1952 , against village " Beniwalon Ki Dhani " , In column 1 ,

(i ) in Survey no . " 1025 " , in column 2 , for the areas " 4-07 " , in column 4 , the nrea "4-09 ", shall be substituted;

( ii) in Survey no . "1048", in column 2 , for the areas " 3-01 " , In column 4, the area "3-02 " , shall be substituted;

(ii )in Survey no. " 1051 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-01 " , in column 4, the area " 1-02 " , shall be substituted;

(iv) in Survey no ." 1093 " , in column 2 , for the areas " 0-02 " , in column 4 , the area " 0-10 ", shall be substituled, ( v) in Survey no . " 1091 " , in column 2 , for the areas " 0-16 ", in column 4, the area " 1-01 ", shall be substituted;

at page 1953 , against village " Beniwalon Ki Dhani" , in column 1 ,

( B)

( vi ) in Survey no. " 1107 " , in column 2 , for the areas " 0-02 " , in column 4, the area "0-09 " , shall be substituted, (vii)in Survey no . " 1111 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-11 " , in column 4, the area " 1-12 " , shall be substituted (viii)in Survey no . " 1077 " , in column 2, for the areas " 0-09 " , in column 4, the area "0-18 " , shall be substituted, (ix)in Survey no. " 1179 " , in column 2, for the areas " 0-03 ", in column 4, the area " 0-07 " , shall be substituted, (x)in Survey no . " 1178 " , in column 2, for the areas " 2-01 ", in column 4 , the area " 2-18 " , shall be substituted;

(xi) in Survey по. " 1268" , in column 2, for the areas " 1-16 " , in column 4, the area " 2-02 " , shall be substituted;

(C)

at page 1953 , against village " Madhaniya Ki Dhani" , in column 1 ,

(i) in Survey no . "2592 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-15" , in column 4 , the area " 4-09 " , shall be substituted;

(ii) in Survey no . " 2594", in column 2 , for the areas "6-10 " , in column 4, the area " 6-16 " , shall be substituted, [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पोष 21 , 1924

169 at page 1954, against village " Kantiya " , in column 1 ,

(α)

(i) in Survey no. "284 " , in column 2, for the areas " 2-11 ", in column 4 , the area " 2-13 " , shall be substituted;

(E) at page 1955, against village " Kantiya ", in column 1,

(ii) in Survey no. "290" , in column2 , for the areas "0-18 " , in column 4, the area " 1-00 ", shall be substituted;

(iii) în Survey no. " 293 ", in column2 , for the areas "0-07 ", in column 4 , the area " 0-12 " , shall be substituted, (iv) in Survey no . "295 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-12 ", in column 4, the area " 1-14 ", shall be substituted, (v) in Survey no. "296 " , in column 2, for the areas " 0-10 " , in column 4, the area " 0-11 " , shall be substituted, ( vi ) in Survey no. "384 " , in column 2 , for the areas " 0-14 " , in column 4 , the area " 0-15 " , shall be substituted;

(vii ) în Survey no . " 387 " , in column 2, for the areas " 3-14 " , in column 4, the area " 3-16 ", shall be substituted;

(F) at page 1956, against village " Jagrampura " , in column 1 ,

( i) in Survey no. "22 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-15 " , in column 4, the area " 1-16 " , shall be substituted;

(ii) in Survey no . "23 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-08 " , in column 4 , the area " 1-09 ", shall be substituted;

( iii) In Survey no. "24 " , in column 2, for the areas "0-17 " , in column 4, the area " 0-18 " , shall be substituted, ( iv) in Survey no . " 27 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-11 " , in column 4, the area " 1-12 " , shall be substituted;

(v) in Survey no. "31 ", in column 2, for the areas " 2-07 " , in column 4, the area " 2-12 " , shall be substituted, (G) at page 1957 , against village "Madpura " , in column 1 ,

(i) In Survey no . " 1320 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-11 " , in column 4, the area " 1-13 " , shall be substituted;

(H) at page 1958 , against village " Shivpura" , in column 1 ,

(i) in Survey no . " 1295 " , in column 2, for the areas "3-00 " , in column 4 , the area " 3-04 " , shall be substituted, ( ii ) in Survey no . " 1308 " , in column2, for the areas " 1-13 " , in column 4, the area " 2-01 ", shall be substituted;

(1) at page 1959 , against village " Andolav" , in column 1 ,

(i) in Survey no. "525", in column 2, for the areas " 0-13 ", in column 4 , the area " 0-16" , shall be substituted;

(ii ) in Survey no . "590 " , in column 2, for the areas " 1-01 ", in column 4, the area " 2-10 " , shall be substituted;

(上)

at page 1959 , against village " Sukholav " , in column 1 ,

(i) în Survey no . " 407 " , in column 2, for the areas " 3-14 " , in column 4, the area " 4-11 " , shall be substituted, (ii) in Survey no. " 406 " , in column 2, for the areas " 0-04 " , in column 4 , the area " 0-05 ", shall be substituted;

170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] at page 1960, against village " Charnisara " , in column 1 ,

( i ) in Survey no . "235 " , in column 2 , for the areas " 2-00 " , in column 4 , the area " 2-04 " , shall be substituted;

at page 1960 , against village " Kharkali " , in column 1 ,

( i) in Survey no. "841 " , in column 2, for the areas " 4-02 " , in column 4, the area "4-04 ", shall be substituted;

(ii)in Survey no . "843" , in column 2, for the areas "5-04" , in column 4, the area " 5-06" , shall be substituted.

[No.R-31015/46/01 -O.R. -II] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 84. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक जामनगर- भोपाल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के क्रियान्वयन करने के लिए पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियिम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. 80 तारीख 09 जनवरी 2002 और का. आ. 2285 तारीख 04 जुलाई , 2002 द्वारा जो क्रमशः राजपत्र, भाग 2, खंड 3 , उपखंड (ii ) तारीख 12 जनवरी, 2002 और 13 जुलाई , 2002 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन करने की अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

i अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के संबंध में श्री एन . एस. कनेश, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, जी० टी० आई० सी० एल० पाइपलाइन परियोजना, भू- तल, 24ए, चन्द्रनगर, ए० बी० रोड़, इन्दौर-452008 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 171 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पोप 21 , 1924

अनुसूची

राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश

जिला: इंदौर

तहसील : देपालपुर

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

गांव का नाम

आरे सेन्टीयर

हेक्टेयर

1. खजराया

73/4

2. मुरखेडा

[फा. सं. एल.- 14014/32 /2001- जी.पी. ( भाग -1 ) ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 84.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of regassified liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar- Bhopal pipeline project ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification:

And whereas the Central Government has for the said purpose declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land vide notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas numbers S.O.80 , dated the 9th January, 2002 and S.O 2285 dated the 4th July , 2002 published in Part II , Section 3 , sub -section (ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 12th January , 2002 and 13th July, 2002 respectively;

Now, therefore. in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) . the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Any person. interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty- one davs from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - section 1 of 7 (3 ) of the said Act , are inade available to the general public, object in writing to `ng of the pipeline under the land to Shri N.S.Kanesh . Competent Authority, eline Project , Ground floor , 24 -A Chandra Nagar, A. B. Road, Indore 452008.

PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21. 1924

172

SCHEDULE

District : Indore

Tehsil : Depalpur

State: Madhya Pradesh 19

AREA

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Are C-Are

Hectare

1) Khajraya

73/4

2)Murkheda

[No. L -14014/32/2 ( X) 1 -G.P. (Part -1 ) | SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 85.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2, खण्ड 3, उपखण्ड (ii) तारीख 12 जनवरी 2002 में पृष्ठ सं. 333 से 364 पर प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 80 तारीख 9 जनवरी 2002 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थातः- उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में-

(क) पृष्ठ 338 पर, स्तंभ 1 में " खजराया" गांव के सामने, स्तंभ 2 की सर्वे सं. "42/1/2 " के सामने स्तंभ 3 , 4 और 5 के " 00-02-20 " क्षेत्र के स्थान पर " 00-27-40" क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. एल. - 14014/32/2001-जी.पी. ( भाग-1 ) ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 85. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O 80, dated the 9th January 2002, published at pages 349 to 364 in Part II, section 3 , sub- section ( ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 12th January, 2002 namely;

In the Schedule to the said notification-

(a) at page 354, against Village "Khajraya" in column No.1 , in Survey No. " 42/1/2 " in column 2, for the area " 00-02-20 "

in column 3,4 and 5, the area " 00-27-40 " shall be substituted;

[No. L- 14014/32/2 (001- SWAMY SIN 173 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पोष 21, 1924

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2003

का. आर . 86. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीतहोता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित्तः प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपन आशय की घोषणा भारत सरकार के राजपत्र भाग 2, खंड 3 , उप्रखंड (ii ) तारीख 12 जनवरी 2002 और 31 अगस्त 2002 भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियिम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का० आ0 79 तारीख 9 जनवरी, 2002 और काळ आ० 2756 तारीख 23 अगस्त 2002 , द्वारा प्रकाशित की थी;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथाप्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री एम. सी. रेजा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लाट नं0 7, क्वालिटी बिजनेस सेन्टर , एम. पी. नगर, जोन-2, भोपाल, (मध्यप्रदेश) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला:सीहोर

राज्यः मध्य प्रदेश तहसीलः आष्टा गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

हेक्टर

सि-आरे

क्षेत्रफल आरे

5 296/4

1. खड़ी

02 298

प.ह.नं.30

44 76

40 2. शेखूखेडा

प.ह.नं .12

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/30/2001-जी.पी. ( भाग-1 ) ] 3889 GI /2002-4

स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक [PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii )| 174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 86.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the pubuc interest that for the transportation of the regassified liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar -Bhopal pipeline project;

And whereas the Central Government has declared its intention to acquire the Right of User vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.79 dated the 9th January, 2002 and S.O.2756 dated the 23rd of August, 2002, published in Para I Section 3 , sub- section ( ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 12th of January, 2002 and 31 ofAugust , 2002;

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline, is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land)Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.C.Reja, Competent Authority , GTICL Pipeline Project, Plot No.7, Quality Business Center, M.P.Nagar , Zone- II , Bhopal .

SCHEDULE

District: Sehore

State: Madhya Pradesh

AREA

Tehsil : Aastha Name of the Village

C-Are

Hectare

Are

Survey No

02 1. KHADI

296/4

298

P.C.NO - 30

[No. L- 14014/30/2001 -G.P. (Part -1 ) ] SWAMY SINGH, Director 175 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोषं 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 87.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii ) में क्रमशः तारीख 12 जनवरी, 2002 के पृष्ठ 294 से 314 तक और तारीख 1 जून , 2002 के पृष्ठ 5155 पर प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मन्त्रालय की क्रमशः अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 79 तारीख 9 जनवरी, 2002 और का० आ0 1799 तारीख 27 मई, 2002 में निम्नलिखित संशोध्न करती है, अर्थात:-

(i) * उक्त अधिसूचना का. आ. 79 की अनुसूची में, पृष्ठ 313 पर स्तंभ 1 में , गांव "खडी" के सामने, स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे नं0 296/3 " में,स्तंभ 3 , 4 और 5 में, क्षेत्रफल 0-33-10 के स्थान पर, क्षेत्रफल "0-35-83" रखा जाएगा ;

(ii) उक्त अधिसूचना का. आ. 1799 की अनुसूची में, पृष्ठ 5155 पर, स्तंभ में, ' गांव "खडी" के सामने, स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे नं0 "299/1/1 " में, स्तंभ 3 , 4 और 5 में, क्षेत्रफल 0-54-60 के स्थान पर , क्षेत्रफल " 0-60-00 " रखा जाएगा ;

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/30/2001- जी.पी . ( भाग-1 ) ] स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 8th January, 2003

S. O. 87. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number. S.O 79, dated the 9th January, 2002 published at pages 314 to 333 and S.O.1799, dated the 27th May 2002 published at page 5155 in part II , section 3 , sub- section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 12th January, 2002 and 1 June , 2002 respectively namely: -

(i) Inthe Schedule to the said notification -S.O. 79 , at page 332, against village " Khadi " in column 1 , in survey No. " 296/3 " in column 2, for the areas " 0-33-10 " in columns 3,4 and 5 the areas " 0-35-83 , shall be substituted;

(ii) In the Schedule to the said notification -S.O. 1799 , at page 5155. against village " Khadi " in column 1 , in survey No. : " 299/1/1 " In column 2, for the areas 0-54-60 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the areas "0-60-00 " shall be substituted.

[No. L-14014/30/2001 -G.P. ( Part -1 ) } SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 88.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा जामनगर- भोपाल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के क्रियान्वयन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी -चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21. 1924

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2, खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii) तारीख क्रमशः 2 फरवरी, 2002 और 25 मई, 2002 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियिम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का० आ० 301 तारीख 1 फरवरी, 2002 और का० आ0 1722 तारीख 21 मई, 2002 द्वारा उक्त परियोजना के लिए उस भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के संबंध में श्री ए . के. संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लाट नं0 304, एटलांटा टावर, तीसरी मंजिल , इंकलाब सोसाएटी के सामने, गुलबाइ टेकरा के नजदीक, आंबावाडी, अहमदाबाद- 380015 , को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : दाहोद

तालुका:लीमखेख

राज्य : गुजरात

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर

गाव का नाम:

2 1

1. नवा वाडीया

स्केर मी.

हेक्टर

क्षेत्रफल आरे

5 3

00 0

(सर्वे नं. 8 और 52 के बीच में)

स्ट्रीम

नदी

40 0

(सर्वे नं. 8 और 52 के पास में)

(गौचर)

2. वनजारिया

77/पैकी

62/पैकी

3. लुखावाडा

00 0

10 0

जिला : दाहोद

तालुका: झालोद

राज्य : गुजरात क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर

गाव का नाम

2 1

177

1. आंबा

आरे

स्केरमी.

हेक्टर

5 3

60 0

जिला : दाहोद

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर

तालुका देवगढबारीया गाव का नाम

2 1

स्केरमी.

राज्य : गुजरात क्षेत्रफल आरे

हेक्टर

5 3

00 0

(सर्वे नं. 285 में)

कार्ट ट्रेक

1. भारी

13 स्ट्रीम

80 0

(सर्वे नंबर 14 और 16 के बीजमें )

58/2+4

2. गुना

40 0

[ फा. सं. एल.- 14014/14/2002- जी.पी . ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 177 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोप 21 , 1924

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi : the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 88.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessaqry in the public interest that for the transportation of regassified liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar- Bhopal pipeline project ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

And whereas the Central Government has for the said purpose declared its intention to acquire the right of user under the land vide notfiication of the Government of India the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 301 , dated the1st February, 2002 and S.O 1722 , dated the 21 May,2002, published in Part II , Section 3 , sub -section (ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 2nd February, 2002 , and the 25th May,2002 respectively;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - section 1 of section ( 3 ) of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K. , Sanghavi , Competent Authority, GTICL pipeline Project , 304, Atlanta Tower, 3rd Floor , Opp . Inqulab Society, Gulbai Tekra, Ambawadi , Ahmedabad- 380 015 .

SCHEDULE

State: Gujarat

District : DAHOD

Taluka : LIMKHEDA

Survey No./Block No.

Name of the Village

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.Mtr

1. NAVAVDIA

Stream (BetweenSurvey No. 8 & 52)

River

49 7

(Near Survey No. 8)

(Gauchar)

77/ Paiki

2. VANJARIA

77/Paiki

62/ Paiki

3. LUKHAWADA

State: Gujarat

District : DAHOD

Taluka : JHALOD

Area

Survey No./Block No.

Name of the Village

Hectare

Are Sq.Mtr.

177

1. Aamba 178

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924 .

District : DAHOD

Taluka : DEVGADBARIA

State: Gujarat

Survey No./Block No.

Name of the Village

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.Mtr.

CartTrack

1. REBARI

(In Survey No.285)

Stream (Between Survey No. 14 & 16)

58/2+4

2. GUNA

[No. L- 14014/14/2002-G.P .] SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 89.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2, खंड 3, उपखंड (ii) तारीख 2 फरवरी 2002 में पृष्ठ सं. 1082 से 1114 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 301 तारीख 01 फरवरी 2002 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात:-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में -

(क) (i) पृष्ठ 1093 पर स्तंभ 1 में "रेबारी" गांव के सामने सर्वे सं. "282/1 से 282/6 " के सामने स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 के '00-55-70" क्षेत्र के स्थान पर "00-80-00" क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा,;

(ii) पृष्ठ 1093 पर स्तंभ 1 में "रेबारी" गांव के सामने स्तंभ 2 की सर्वे सं. " 285" के सामने स्तंभ 3,4और 5 के " 00-17-90° क्षेत्र के स्थान पर "00-22-00" क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा ;

(iii) पृष्ठ 1093 पर स्तंभ 1 में "रेबारी" गांव के सामने, स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे क्रमांक " 284/p. 284/p. 284/2" के सामने स्तंभ 3, 4 और 5 के 00-19-90 क्षेत्र के स्थान पर 00-31-70° क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा,, और सर्वे सं. "284/2" के सामने, स्तंभ 2, 3 के बीच केवल " (सरकारी जमीन)" शब्दों का लोप किया जाएगा ;

(ख) पृष्ठ 1095 पर स्तंभ 1 में ' असायडी" गांव के सामने, स्तंभ 2 की सर्वे सं. "225" के सामने स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 के "00-44-10 " क्षेत्र के स्थान पर "00-44-70 ° क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा, ;

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/14/2002-जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक

New Delhi, the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 89. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O 301 , dated the 1 February , 2002, published at pages 1097 to 1114 in Part II , Section 3 , Sub -section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 2nd February 2002 , namely ;

In the Schedule to the said notification-

(a) at page 1110, against Village " Rebari " in column No.1 , (i) in Survey No. " 282/1 to 282/6 " in column 2, for the area "00-55-70 " in column 3,4 and 5, the area " 00-80-00 " shall be substituted;

179 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पोप 21, 1924

{ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(ii) in Survey No. " 285 " in column2 , for the area " 00-17-90 " in column 3,4 and 5, the area " 00-22-00 " shall be substituted;

(iii) in Survey No. " 284/P , 284/P, 284/2 " in column 2, for the area "00-19-90" in column 3,4 and 5, the area " 00-31-70 " shall be substituted; and words "(Government Land ) " between column 2,3 against the Survey N0 . "284/2 " only be deleted;

(b) at page 1113 , against Village " Asaidi " in column 1 , Survey No. "225 " in column 2 , for the area "00-44-10" in column 3,4 and 5 , the area "00-44-70" shall be substituted .

[No. L - 14014/ 14/2002 -G.P. ] SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 90.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक जामनगर- भोपाल पाइपलाइन परियोजना को कार्यान्वित करने के लिए पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियिम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का० आ० 369 तारीख 01 फरवरी, 2002, और का० आ 0 1654 तारीख 13 मई, 2002 द्वारा जो क्रमशः भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2 , खण्ड 3 , उप खण्ड (ii ) तारीख 9 फरवरी, 2002, और 18 मई, 2002 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने की अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री ए. के. संघवी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन परियोजना, 304, एटलांन्टा टावर, तीसरी मंजिल, गुलबाइ टेकरा के नजदीक, इंकलाब सोसाइटी के सामने, आंबावाडी, अहमदाबाद- 380015, को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii )

अनुसूची

तालुका : दाहोद

जिला : दाहोद

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर / ब्लोक नंबर

हेक्टर

आरे स्केरमी.

5 1. खरेडी

401/पी

50 2. खरोड

401/पी रोड

(सर्वे नंबर 301/40और 196 के बीचमें )

90 रोड

(सर्वे नंबर 196 के दक्षिणमें)

60 1

60 13

40 14

(सरकारीजमीन)

301/42

30 15

70 9/बी

[फा. सं. एल.- 14014/13/2002-जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

New Delhi . the 8th January . 2003

S. O. 90.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of regassified liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar - Bhopal pipeline project;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

And whereas the Central Government has , for the said purpose , declared its intention to acquire the right of user under the land vide notifications of the Government of India in theMinistry of Petroleum and Natural Gas numbers S.O.369, dated the 1ª February, 2002 and the S.O. 1654 , dated the 13th May,2002 , published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 9th February , 2002 and the 18th May,2002 respectively;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of usertherein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri A.K. Sanghavi ,, Competent Authority , GTICL pipeline Project , 304, Atlanta Tower , 3rd Floor, Opp. Inqulab Societyt, Gulbai Tekra , Ambawadi , Ahmedabad- 380 015 .

181 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोप. 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State:Gujarat.

District: DAHOD

Taluka : DAHOD

Name of the Village

Survey No./BlockNo.

Area Are Sq.Mtr.

Hectare

1. KHAREDI

401/P

Road

2. KHAROD

(Between Sur. No.301 /40 & 196)

Road

(Southof Survey No. 196

301/42

(Govt. Land)

9/B

[No. L- 14014/13/2002-G.P. ] SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 91.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए जो भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 369 तारीख 1 जनवरी 2002, भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2, खंड 3 , उपखंड (ii) तारीख 9 फरवरी 2002 में पृष्ठ क्रमांक 1417 से 1430 पर प्रकाशित की गई थी में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात:-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में

(क) (i) पृष्ठ 1420 पर स्तंभ 1 में " खरेड़ी" गांव के सामने, स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे क्रमांक 401/3 " के सामने स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 के " 00-01-9 " क्षेत्र के स्थान पर "00-34-00" क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा. ;

(ii) पृष्ठ 1420 पर स्तंभ 1 में " खरेड़ी" गांव के सामने, स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे क्रमांक "401 / 2 /p " के सामने स्तंभ 3,4और 5 के "00-01-60" क्षेत्र के स्थान पर " 00-15-60 " क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा,;

(ख) (i) पृष्ठ 1423 पर स्तंभ 1 में "खरोड" गांव के सामने, स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे क्रमांक " 301/40 " के सामने स्तंभ 3,4 और 5 के "00-18-00 " क्षेत्र के स्थान पर "00-21-10 " क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा, ;

(ii) पृष्ठ 1423 पर स्तंभ 1 में "खरोड" गांव के सामने स्तंभ 2 के सर्वे क्रमांक " 196" के सामने स्तंभ 3.4 और 5 के 00-11-01 क्षेत्र के स्थान पर "00-13-80 " क्षेत्र रखा जाएगा. :

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/13/2002 - जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 3889 GI/ 2002-5 182

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 91. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 5 (50 bf61962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum.and Natural Gas muhamber S.0-369, dated the 1st January, 2002, published at pages 1431 to 1442 in Part II, Section 3 , Sub- Section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 9th February 2002, namely;

In the Schedule to the said notification:

(a) at page 1433 , against Village "Kharedi" in column.1 , - (i) in Survey No. " 401/3 " in column 2, for the area "00-01-90 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "00-34-00" shall be substituted;

(ii) in Survey No. " 401 /2/P " in column2, for the area "00-01-60 " in columns 3,4 and 5, the area "00-15-60" shall be substituted;

(b) at page 1436, against Village "" "Kharod" in column 1 , - (i) In Survey No. "301/40" in column 2, for the area "00-18-00 " in columns 3,4 and 5 , the area "00-21-10 " shall be substituted;

(ii) in Survey No. " 196 in column 2, for the area " 00-11-00 " in columns 3,4 and 5 , the area "00-13-80 " shall be substituted;

[No. L - 14014/13/2002-G.P. ] SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2003

शुद्धिपत्र

का. आ . 9.2.- भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2979 तारीख 19 सितम्बर, 2002 , जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii) तारीख 21 सितम्बर, 2002 के पृष्ठ संख्या 9137 पर प्रकाशित की गई थी, के हिन्दी पाठ में पृष्ठ 9136 पर पंक्ति 36 में शीर्ष गांव के नाम के नीचे स्तंभ 1 में 13 छापरी" में शीर्ष गांव के नाम के नीचे स्तंभ 1 में " प.ह.नं. 37" पढ़ा जाए ;

[फा. सं. एल. -14014/30/2001- जी.पी . ( भाग -1 ) ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 183 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोष 21, 1924

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2003

का. आ. 93.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में भोपालगलक पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा जामनगर-भोपाल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के क्रियान्वयन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2, खंड 3, उपखंड ) तारीख क्रमशः 26 जुलाई, 2002 और 27 जुलाई , 2002 में प्रकाशित भारल सरकारको पेट्रोलियिम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का० आ0 209 तारीख 22 जनवरी 2002 और का० आ० 2426 तारीख 22 जुलाई , 2002 द्वारा उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की श्रीराधा की उपध्याय (स) द्वारा - प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिग्रधिकाश अर्जमर्जकारके के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णितंतूमिभूमि हितबिंब है, ऐसउतारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा () ()ोधीजवीजारीनकी गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जातीही इंक्व्हीस सिनकि सीतसी भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के संबंध में श्री एन. एस. कनेश, सक्षमध्क्षमाधिकारीक जी० टी० आई० सी० एल ० पाइपलाइन परियोजना, भू- सल, 2424 चन्द्रमसगरए० ए०बी० बी०रोड़, इन्दौर-452008 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेमागेगा।

अनुसूची

राज्यावमध्य

जिला:घास्त्र

तहसील बदनावर

क्षेत्रफलफ

सर्वे नंबर

गांव का नाम

हेक्टेयाटेकर आरे अरे सेन्टीयर

3 3

255/1

1. रंगाराखेडी

255/2

[फा. संकाएल.- 14014/33/2001-जी.पी. ( भाग -1)]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 184.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | New Delhi, the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 93. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of regassified liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar -Bhopal pipeline project ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU ) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

And whereas the Central Government has for the said purpose declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.209 , dated the 22nd January2002 and S.O 2426, dated the 22nd July 2002, published in Part II Section 3 , sub-section ( ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 26th January, 2002 and 27th July, 2002 respectively ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land)Act , 1962 (50 of 962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section ( 3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri N.S.Kanesh, Competent Authority, GTICL pipeline Project , Ground floor, 24-A Chandra Nagar, A.B.Road, Indore-452008 .

SCHEDULE

District : Dhar

State: Madhya Pradesh Tehsil : Badnawar

AREA

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

C-Are

Hectare Are

255/1

1) Rangarakhedi

255/2

[No. L - 14014/33/2001 -G.P. (Part -1 ) ]

SWAMY SINGH , Director 185 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पोप 21 , 1924

[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 94.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में जामनगर से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में भोपाल तक जामनगर- भोपाल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के क्रियान्वयन के लिए पुनः गैसीकृत द्रवित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2 , खंड 3, उपखंड (ii) तारीख 12 जनवरी , 2002 और 1 जून, 2002 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 76 तारीख 9 जनवरी , 2002 और का0 आ० 1797 तारीख 27 मई, 2002 द्वारा उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए , यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के संबंध में श्री एन. एस. कनेश, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , जी०टी ०आई० सी० एल ० पाइपलाइन परियोजना, भू- तल, 24ए, चन्द्रनगर, ए० बी० रोड, इन्दौर-452008 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

`अनुसूची

राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश

जिला : इंदौर

तहसील: सांवेर

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

गांव का नाम

आरे सेन्टीयर

हेक्टेयर

1. लसूडिया परमार

[फा. सं. एल. - 14014/27/2001- जी.पी. ( भाग -1 ) ]

स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक 186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21. 1924

[ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 8th January , 2003

S. O. 94.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the regassified liquefied natural gas from Jamnagar in the State of Gujarat to Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited for implementing Jamnagar- Bhopal pipeline project ;

And whereas the Central Government has declared its intention to acquire the right of use vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.76 dated the 9th January2002 and S.O 1797 dated the 27th May 2002 , published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub-Section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 2nd January, 2002 and the 1 June, 2002 ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU ) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now , therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri N.S.Kanesh , Competent Authority, GTICL pipeline Project , Ground floor , 24-A Chandra Nagar , A. B.Road , Indore - 452008 .

SCHEDULE

State: Madhya Pradesh District : Indore

Tehsil : Sanwer

AREA

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village....

Are C -Are

Hectare

1) Lasudiya Parmar

No. L- 14014/27/2001 - G.P. ( Part -1 )| SWAMY SINGH , Director 187 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पोप 21 , 1924

भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2003

का. आ. 95.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रासट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रर्वतक कम्पनी मेसर्स रेलाएंस इण्डस्टीज के गोवा राज्य के उत्तरी /दक्षिणी. अपतट में खोज बलाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश में संरचना से वास्कोडिगामा से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य के मेदक जिले में विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रासट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिएः

केन्द्रीय सरकार ने भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज गैस मन्त्रालय का . आ . 212 तारीख 22 जनवरी 2002 और का. आ. 2822 तारीख 3 सितम्बर 2002 द्वारा की थी जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खंड 3, उपखंड ( ii) में क्रमशः तारीख 26 जनवरी 2002 और 7 सितम्बर 2002 को प्रकाशित की गई थीः

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबब्ल अनुसूचि में वर्णित हैं, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाएः

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैंः

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री पी . बुच्चा रेड्डी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन परियोजना, गावं पेद्धापुर, सर्वे नंबर 683 और-684, राष्ट्रीय मार्ग 9 पर, सदाशिवपेठ मण्डल, मेदक जिला, आन्ध्रप्रदेश 502306 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

ऐरिया

सि-ऐर

ऐर

हेक्टेर

सर्वे नंबर

सब-डिविजन नंबर

गांव का नाम

राष्ट्र : आन्ध्रप्रदेश

जिला: मेदक

मण्डल: जहीराबाद

45 00

224

1. होथी (बुजत्रुग)

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/3/2002- जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, नि 188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th January , 2003

S. O. 95.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore of Goa and structure in Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of District Medak in the State of Andhra Pradesh, a pipeline should be laid by M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas the Central Government have declared its intention to acquire the right of user vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas under S.O. 212 dated 22nd January , 2002 and S.O. 2822 dated the 3rd September , 2002, published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- Section (ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 26th January, 2002 and 7th September , 2002 respectively;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user of land under which the said pipeline isproposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land )Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri P.Butcha Reddy, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Pipeline Project , Village Peddapur (Survey No.683 and 684) , On National Highway No.9 , Sadashivpet Mandal , Medak district Andhra Pradesh . Pin: 502306.

SCHEDULE

AREA

Are C-Are

Hectare

Sub-Division No

SurveyNo

Nameof the Village

State:Andhra Pradesh

District: Medak

Mandal : Zahirabad

224

1.Hothi (Bujrug)

[No. L - 14014/3/2002-G.P . ]

SWAMY SINGH , Director भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग 11- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामलेविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 96.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा नीदर लैंड्स मीटइन्स्टीट्यूट ( एन एम आई ) नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी माडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक और उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वार। प्रदत्त शंक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इंडरेस हौसर ( इंडिया ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, एक्सकाम हाउस, ग्राउंड फ्लोर ( साउथ इंड ) , 7 साकी विहार रोड, अंधेरी ( पू), मुंबई-400072 द्वारा विनिर्मित किसी परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के मैसर्स इंडरे हौसर हापस्ट्रेसी, 1 , डी-79689 मालबर्ग जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित और भारत में विक्रीत एफ एम आर 530 , एफ एम आर 531 , एफ एम आर-532 और एफ एम आर 533 श्रृंखला, एम और एफ 590 , आर टीयू81 30 एंड फ्यूल मैनेजर से समाविष्ट " माइक्रोपाइलट एस " ब्रांड नाम के राडार लेवल गॉज भापमान प्रणाली के माडल है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13/ 2002/ 31 समनुदेशित किया गया है , और प्रकाशित करती है ।

प्रणाली में निम्नलिखित समाविष्ट है;

( i ) " माइक्रो पाइलट एस " व्यवसाय नाम का राडार लेवल गॉज एफ एम आर 530, एफ एम आर 531 , एफ एम आर 532 और एफ एम आर 533 श्रृंखलाओं से समाविष्ट का भंडारण टैंकों में द्रव स्तर के माप के लिए किया जाता है राडार लेवल गाज माइक्रोपाइल एस जो टैंक पर लगे हुए हैं । यह शिखर पर प्रदर्श है जिसका उपयोग संरूपण प्रयोधानों के लिए किया जा सकता है । यह टैंक की ओर (एम एम आई टी 5754 पुनरीक्षण 1 ) पर अवस्थित टैंक साइड मानीटर को संसूचित करता है ;

RT!!

Remote Terminal Unit RTU 8130

Micropilot S Radar Gauge FMR 53 ) Tank Side Monitor NRF590

( ii ) टैंक साइड मानीटर ; एन आर डी 590 यह टैंक की ओर अवस्थित है और एच ए आर टभ् से होकर राडार को संसूचित करता है यह राडार गाज को 24 वीडी सी भी प्रदाय करता है । इसके पास ब्लैक लिट प्रदर्श हैं । एन एम आई परीक्षण रिपोर्ट सी श्री एम/200959/ 01 है ।

( iii ) संचार इंटर फेस यूनिट आर टी यू नियंत्रण कदन में अवस्थित है और विभिन्न प्रोटोकालों पर फील्ड उपस्करों से संसूचित करता है । यह पी सी ( एन एम आई टी सी 3436 ) के साथ सीरियल लिंक पर संसूचित करता है , और

(iv ) टैंक इनवेंटरी मनेजमेंट एस सी ए डी ए साफ्टवेयर: फ्यूल मैनेजर किसी पी सी पर लोड किया गया एस सी ए डी ए साफ्टवेयर पर आधारित विंडो है । यह आर टी यूं से डाटा प्राप्त करता है और ए एस डी एम/ ए पी आई सारणियों के अनुसार शुद्ध संपरिवर्तित करता है । यह विभिन्न ग्राफिक पर डाटा भी संप्रदर्श करता है । यह डी सी एस होस्ट विंडोलिंक को एन एम आई टी सा 3436/डी सी एस होस्ट को संसूचित करता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 (48 ) 388961/02-6

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 20th December , 2002

S.O. 96. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , along with the model approval certificate issued by the Netherlands Meetinstituut ( NMI ) , Netherlands , and satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to Sub - section (3 ) and sub - Section (7 ) and Sub - section ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the Radar Level Gauge measuring System with brand name " Micropilot S" comprising of FMR 530 , FMR 531 , FMR 532 and FMR 533 Series . NRF 590 , RTU 8130 and Fuels Manager, manufacturedby M/ s Endress + Hauser . Hauptstrasse 1 , D - 79689 Maulberg . Germany and sold in India without any alteration or additions by M/ s Endress + Hauser. ( India ) Pvt. Ltd. , Excom House . Ground Floor ( South ing ) , 7. Saki Vihar road , Andheri (E ) , Mumbai- 400 072 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 / 2002/ 31 ;

Fuels Manager

RT!!

Remote Terminal Unit

RTU-8130

Micropilot S Radar Gauge FMR 53 ) Tank Side Monitor NRF590

The system comprises the following :-

( i ) Radar Level Gauge of trade name "Micropilot S " comprising of FMR 530 , FMR 531. FMR 532 and FMR 533 Series . The radar level gauge Micropilot S mounted on tank to is used to measure liquid level in a storage tanks . It has a display at the top . which can be used for configuration purposes . It communicates to Tank Side Monitor located at the Tank side ( NMI - T. 5754 Revision 1 ) .

( in) Tank Side Monitor : NRD 590. It is located at tank side and communicates to the Radar Gauge via HART. It also supplies 24 VDC supply to Radar Gauge . It has backlit display ( NMI Test report CVN /200959 /01 ) . ( iii) Conmmunication Interface Unit : RTU 8130. RTU is located in Control Room and communicates with Field Instruments on various protocols . it also communicates on serial link with PC ( NMI TC 3436 ) ; and ( iv ) Tank Inventory Management SCADA Software : Fuels Manager is Window based SCADA software loaded on to a PC. It receives data from RTU and converts it into gross / net volume as per ASTM/API tables . It also displays data on different graphics and generates various reports. IT also communicates to DCS /HOST on various links (NMI TC 3436 ) .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (48 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY . Director , Legal Metrology 191 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पोप 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 97.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलेक्ट्रो इंडिया, सी एस सम. 2766, राजेश टेलर के पास , पंचशिलानगर, सांगली -416416 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ई आई टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अल्ट्रा हाई प्रसीलन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001 / 266 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है,

उक्तमाडल एक अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही आयताकार खण्ड है, जिसकी भुजाएं 300 x 200 मि.मी. प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 110210 गैरहिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 158 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 97. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - Section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the Certificate of approval of model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) of " EIT " series with brand name "ULTRA HIGH PRECISION" ( hereinafter referred to as model ) , manufactured by M/s Electro India , C.S. No. 2766. Near Rajesh Tailor, Panchashilanagar , Sangali - 416416 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2001/266;

The said model is load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ). The maximum capacity is 20kg and minimum capacity 100g . The value of verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The load receptor is of rectangular section of side 300 x 200mm . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 volts, 50 Hz alternate current power supply .

ELECTRO - INDIA

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- Section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Centraa Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with the maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale Interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10.000 for ` e` value of 100 ing to 2g and with the number of verification scale interna (n) in the range 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer is accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model had been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 158 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 193 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 98.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलेक्ट्रो इंडिया, सी एस सं . 2766, राजेश टेलर के पास , पंचशिलानगर, सांगली -416416 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ई आई पी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अल्ट्रा हाई प्रसीलन" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2001 / 267 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमाडल एक अस्वचालित ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही आयताकार खण्ड है, जिसकी भुजाएं 300 × 200 मि. मी. प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

(

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा . से अधिक और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 और 5 × 10 के है जिस्में के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 158 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 98. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed au thority , is satisfied that the models described in the said report ( the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the Certificate of approval of model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (accuracy class - III) of "EIT " series with brand name "UL- TRA HIGH PRECISION " ( hereinafter referred to as model ) , manufactured by M/ s Electro India , C.S. No. 2766 , Near Rajesh Tailor . Panchashilanagar , Sangali - 416416 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2001/267;

The said model is load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Plat form type ) . The maximum capacity is 100kg and minimum capacity of 400g . The value of verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect. The load receptor is of rectangular section of side 300 × 200mm . The Light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts , 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make. accuracy and performance of same series with having maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with make of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which the approved model l 3 been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 158 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology 195 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 99.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स विनिल् प्रोसेस कंट्रोल प्रा. लि. दुकान नं. बी. 6 , भूतल , एस टी सी कोआपरेटिव हाउसिंग सोसाइटी प्रा. एन.एस. फडन्द मार्ग, अंधेरी ( ई ) मुंबई-400069 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) " वी पी सी- डब्ल्यू एस सी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण संपरिवर्तन प्लेट फार्म प्रकार के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विनिल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/01 / 282 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति नीचे दी गई है ) लोड सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का अंकक सूचन सहित संपरिवर्तन प्लेट फार्म प्रकार तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमानअन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

0000

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के, उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 टन तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के लिए के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (3 )/99.

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii )]

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 99.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed au- thority. is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7 ) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the Certificate of approval of model of non-automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit for platform Type ) with digital indication ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) belonging to Medium accuracy class ( accuracy class III ) . VPC - WSC series with brand name VINIL' , manufactured by M/ s Vinil Process Controls Pvt. Ltd.. Shop no . B -6,Ground Floor, S.T.C. Co- op . Hsg . Society , Prof. N. S. Phadke Marg , Andheri ( E) , Mumbai -400 069 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/01/09/282 ;

The said model ( the figure given below) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit for platform type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 1000 kg . minimum capacity 4 kg and belonging to Me- dium accuracy class (accuracy class III ) . The value of verification scale interval (e) is 200g . The display unit is of light emitting diode. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

0000

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 5 tonne and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range 500 to 10,000 for ` e` value of 5 g or more and with 'e ' value to 1 × 100k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole mumber or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 3 )/99 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

197 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 100.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानव (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स विनिल प्रोसेस कंट्रोल प्रा. लि. दुकान नं. बी. 6 , भूतल, एस टी सी कोआपरेटिव हाउसिंग सोसाइटी प्रा. एन. एस. फडके मार्ग , अंधेरी ( ई ) मुंबई -400069 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) " वि पी सी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण , उपकरण/मशीन ( दुग्ध तोलन प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विनिल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/01 /09/ 283 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमाडल ( आकृति नीचे दी गई है ) लोड सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का अंकक सूचन सहित ( दुग्ध तोलक प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा . तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल् का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के लिए के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 3 ) /99 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3889611027 198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) )

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 100. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the Certificate of approval of model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Milk Weigher Type) with digital indication ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) belonging to Medium accuracy class (accu- racy class III ) . VPC - MBES series with brand name ' VINIL' , manufactured by M/s Vinil Process Controls Pvt . Ltd. , Shop No. B -6 . Ground Floor . S.T.C. Co - op . Hsg . Socicty , Prof. N. S. Phadke Marg , Andheri (E) , Mumbai -400069 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/01 /09/283 :

The said model ( the figure given below ) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( milk weigher type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 300 kg . minimum capacity 4 kg and belonging to Medium accuracy class ( accuracy class III ) . The value of verification scale interval ( e ) is 200g. The display unit is of light emitting diode . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 500 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value to 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials which the approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 3 )/ 99 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

199 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 101.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स विनिल प्रोसेस कंट्रोल प्रा. लि. दुकान नं. बी. 6, भूतल , एस टी सी कोआपरेटिव हाउसिंग सोसाइटी प्रा. एन. एस . फडके मार्ग , अंधेरी ( ई ) मुंबई- 400069 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) " वि पी सी II " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विनिल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एनडी/09/

/281 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त माडल ( आकृति नीचे दी गई है ) लोड सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का अंकक सूचन सहित टेबल टॉप प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है;

0000

い

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है वि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनक अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिसस् अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन भापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 10 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के. या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 3 )/99 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 200

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) )

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 101. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority . is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the Certificate of approval of model of non - automatic weighing instruinent ( table top type ) with digital indication ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) belonging to Mediuin accuracy class ( accuracy class III ). VPC - II series with brand name ' VINIL ' , manufactured by M/s Vinil Process Controls Pvt . Ltd. , Shop No. B -6, Ground Floor. S.T.C. Co - op. Hsg . Society . Prof. N. S. Phadke Marg . Andheri ( E ) , Mumbai - 400069 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/01 / 09/ 281 ;

The said model ( the figure given below ) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 6 kg . minimum capacity 20 g and belonging to Medium accuracy class (accuracy class III ) . The value of verification scale interval ( e ) is 1 g. The display unit is of light emitting diode. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act . the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and perfomance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scal interval ( n) in the range 100 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value to 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 3)/ 99)

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 201 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 102.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सूर्या स्केल्स, 3121 , 19 वां क्रास, बनशंकरी II स्टेज, के. आर. रोड, बंगलौर-560070 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई पी- सी" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सूर्या " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001/303 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है । यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमत 120 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत वयवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही वर्ग खंड है , जिसकी भुजाएं 430 मि.मि. x 430 मि.मि. हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SURYASCALES

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 308 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 102. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provi- sions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non- automatic weighing instrument (Plat- form type) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy class III ) , of ' EP -C ' series with brand name "SURYA " (herein referred to as the model ) manufactured by M/S Surya Scales , # 3121 , 19th Cross , Banashankari Ii stage . K. R. Road. Bangalore - 560070 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2001/303 ;

The said model (the figure given ) is a load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( platform type) . The maximum capacity is 120kg and minimum capacity 400g . The value of verification scale interval ( c) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The load receptor is of square section of side 430 mm × 430 mm. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result the instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;

SURYASCALES

Further . in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) ofsection 36 of the said Act , the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 300 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value to 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (308 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

203 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 103.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेवल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 100 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही वर्ग खंड है, जिसकी भुजाएं 180 × 180 मि.मि. हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Gold

Scales

S SURYASCALES

MODE!

GRAMMEWEIGHT

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में हैं और 100 मि.ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) 5000 से 50,000 तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 308 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 103. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provi- sions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the inodel of the non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication belonging to High accuracy (Accuracy class II ) of ' EP -P ' series with brand nam "SURYA" ( herein referred to as the model ) manufacturedby M/ S Surya Scales , # 3121 , 19th Cross , Banashankari Il stage. K. R. Road, Bangalore - 560070 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2001 / 301 ;

The said model (the figure given ) is a load cell based non - autoinatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) . The maximum capacity is 2kg and minimum capacity 5g. The value of verification scale interval ( e ) is 100mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The load receptor is of square section of side 180mm × 180 mm. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz. alternate current power supply ;

SCALES

GRAMMEWEIGHT

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (308)/2001

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 205 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर,

का.आ. 104.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधि‌कारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सूर्या स्केल्स, 3/21 , 19 वां क्रास , बनशंकरी 11 स्टेज, के. आर. रोड, बंगलौर-560070 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई टी- सी" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सूर्या " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2001 / 302 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही आयताकार खंड है, जिसकी भुजाएं 340 मि.मि. x 260 मि.मि. हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपर्दार्शत करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 308 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

New Delhi . the 23rd December , 2002

388961102-8 206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] S.O. 104. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provi- sions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instru- ment ( table top type ) with digital indication belonging to Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) of ' ET - C ' series with brand name " SURYA " (herein referred to as the model ) manufactured by M/s . Surya Scales , 3121 , 19th Cross, Banashankari II stage . K. R. Road , Bangalore - 560070 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/2001 /302 ;

The said model ( the figure given) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) . The maximum capacity is 10 kg and minimum capacity 40 g . The value of verification scale interval ( e) is 2 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The load receptor is of rectangular section of side 340mm > 260mm. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result the instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply:

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verifica- tion scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (308)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director . Legal Metrology [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

207 भारत का जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 24

मई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 105.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इस्सर पेंटागन सिस्टम्स, 9 , पाधे हनुमंथा अटयर स्ट्रीट, काम राजर सलाय , मदुरै-635009 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई पी एस- टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पेंटागन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001/199 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारितं आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

PENTAGON

ESSAR PENTAGON SYSTEMS

EPS 10T

Max.: 10K6

Min. 205 19

Dreams made real

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में है और 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फ़ा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 130) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्ण मूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

208

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 105. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non - automatic, (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EPS - T " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class III ) and with brand name " PENTAGON " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Essar Pentagon Systems 9. Padhe Hanumantha lyer Streeı , Kamarajar Salai , Madurai -635 009 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09. 2001/199;

The said model ( see the figure ) is a load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximun capacity of 10 kg and minimum capacity 20 g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrumen operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;

TARE

ESSAR PENTADON SYSTEMS

PENTAGON EPS INT

Max.: 10KG

Min. :203 0:19

Dreams made real

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' c' value of 100 mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k , 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciple, design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 130 ) /2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology 209 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 106.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इस्सर पेंटागन सिस्टम्स, १ , पाधे हनुमंथी अय्यर स्ट्रीट, कामराजर सलाय , मदुरै -635009 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई पी एस- पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पेंटागन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001 / 200 समनुदेशित किया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 130) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 106. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating , non - automatic , (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EPS -P " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy Class III ) and with brand name " PENTAGON " ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Essar Pentagon Systems , 9. Padhe Hanumantha Iyer Street , Kamarajar Salai , Madurai -635 009 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/200;

The said Model ( see the figure ) is a load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100 kg and minimum capacity of 200g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instru- ment operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 300 kg and with number of verification scak interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 130)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 211 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21, 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 107.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलेक्ट्रो इंडिया, चारू भाई शाह फैसलिटी , प्लाट सं. 106 , वसंतदादा इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, सांगली -416416 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " ई आई एच पी-2 के" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नास " इलेक्ट्रो इंडिया " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002/ 11 समनुदेशित किय गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक लोड सेल आधारितअस्व चालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6000 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मानं 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । भार सेल विकृत गेज प्रकार का है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा . तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदितं मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 के रेंज में है 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में है 100 मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 * है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 309 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) )

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 107. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the models described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) and sub - section (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication belonging to high accuracy ( accuracy Class - II ) of " EI - HP - 2K " series with brand name " ELECTRO INDIA " ( hereinafter referred to as model ) , manufactured by M/s . Electro India, Charubha. Shah Facility, Plot No. 106 , Vasantdata Industrial Estate , Sangali -416416 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2002/11 ;

The said model is a load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) . The maximum capacity is 6000g and minimum capacity of 25g . The value of verification scale interval (e) is 0.5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply . The load cell is of strain gauge type .

ELECTRO - DA

Further, in exercise of the power conferredby sub- section ( 12 ) of the Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with the number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k , 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 309)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 213 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 108.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इलेक्ट्रो इंडिया , चारू भाई शाह फैसलिटी , प्लाट सं. 106 वसंतदादा इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, सांगली-416416 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थत ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ई आई- पी बी के " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, इलेक्ट्रॉनिक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलेक्ट्रो इंडिया " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /2002 / 12 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( संपरिवर्तन किट ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । भार सेल विकृत गेज प्रकार का है ।

TRO INDIA

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 टन तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 और 5 × 10 के है जिसमें केधनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (309 )/2001.1

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 388991/02-9 214

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2002

S.O. 108. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the models described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) and sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hercby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kit for platform ) with digital indication belonging to high accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) of " El- PCK™ series with brand name " ELECTRO INDIA" ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/s . Electro India . Charubhai Shah Facility , Plot No. 106 , Vasantdada Industrial Estate , Sangali -416416 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/ 2002 / 12:

The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (conversion kit ) . The maximum capacity is 300 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The value of verification scale interval ( c ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230V. 50Hz alternate current power supply . The load cell is of strain gauge type .

ELECTRO INDIA

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with having maximum capacity up to 5,000 kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5.000 to 50,000 for ' c ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 % , 5 × 10 . kbeing a positive or negative whole mumber or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

IF . No. WM - 21 ( 309 )/20011

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director . Legal Metrology 215 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग 11 - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 109.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( मीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स प्रामिज वेज ( इंडिया ) , नैनीताल रोड, रुद्रपुर, जिला- ऊधमसिंह नगर-263153 ( उ.प्र. ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तुला चौकी स्टील यार्ड प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रामिज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडेल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002 / 09 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे आकृति दी गई है ) 50 टन की अधिकतम क्षमता और 100 कि. ग्रा. की न्यूनतम क्षमता वाले यांत्रिकी तुला चौकी (स्टील यार्ड प्रकार ) का मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसमें सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है;

MEDBY: PROMISE MEIGH (INDIA)

RUDRAPUR UP

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनक विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 टन से अधिक हो जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के और 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 (57 )/97 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 23rd December, 2002

S.O. 109. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instru- ment , mechanical weigh -bridge , steel yard type, PWI series with the brand name " PROMISE " (hereinafter referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) , manufacturedby M/s . Promise Weigh ( India), Nainital Road. Rudrapur , Dist .: Udham Singh Nagar- 263 153 (UP ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2002/ 09:

The said model ( the figure given below ) is a non - automatic weighing instrument of mechanical weigh -bridge (steel yard type ) of maximum capacity 50 tonne minimum capacity 100 kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class III ) . The value of verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg .

MFOBY: PROMISE NEICH ( INDIA)

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Centra Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value equal to or more than 5 kg and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% . 2 × 10% or 5 × 10 * , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same mana- facturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (57 )/97 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 217 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 110.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 (1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधियों में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सेलेक्ट पैकेजिंग मशीनरी लिमिटेड, सी-1/बी-886/ 3 , जी आई डी सी, मकरपुरा , बड़ौदा-390010 द्वारा विनिर्मित " ईको " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( द्रव/श्यान की बाबत ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सेलेक्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2002/22 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है।..

SELECT

उक्तमॉडल एक स्वचालित ( द्रव/श्यान ) भरण मशीन है । मशीन को 5 मि.ली. से 5000 मि.ली. के बीच के किसी भी रेंज को परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित किया जा सकता है । मशीन द्रव/ श्यान को भरने के लिए अभिकल्पित है । प्रदर्श ईकाई प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रकार का है।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 288 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 110. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the models described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model in respect of automatic filling machine ( liquid/viscous ) of ' ECO ' series with brand name " Select " ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Select Packaging Machinery Ltd. ,C- 1/B - 886/3 ,G.I.D.C. , Makarpura , Baroda - 390 010 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2002/22;

SELECT

The model is an automatic filling machine ( liquid/viscous ) . The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 5ml to 5000ml . The machine is designed to fill liquid/viscous . It operates on 230 volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply . The display is of Light Emitting Diode type.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 288 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 219 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 111.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधियों में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सेलेक्ट पैकेजिंग मशीनरी लिमिटेड, सी -1/बी-886/3 , जी आई डी सी, मकरपुरा , बड़ौदा -390010 द्वारा विनिर्मित " ईको " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( द्रव/ श्यान की बाबत ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सेलेक्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002/ 21 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन है । मशीन को 1 ग्रा. से 5 कि.ग्रा . के बीच के किसी भी रेंज को परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित किया जा सकता है । संभरण प्रणाली ऑगर फिलर या कप फिलर है । यह मशीन चूर्ण , मसाले, कणिकों आदि जैसे अमुक्त प्रवाही उत्पादों को भरने के लिए अभिक्रल्पित है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 288 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11, 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

220

New Delhi , the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 111. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribea authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provi- sions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now. therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model in respect of automatic filling machine of ECO series with brand name " Select " ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Select Packaging Machinery Ltd .. C - 1/B - 886 /3 , G.I.D.C .. Makarpura. Baroda - 390 010 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2002/21:

The model is an automatic filling machine. The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 1g . to 5kg. The feeding system can be Auger filler or cup filler. The machine is designed to fill non- free flowing products such as powder , spiccs , granules etc. It operates on 230 volts . 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 288 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director . Legal Metrology.

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2002

का.आ. 112.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया हैकि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साईसन् इंजीनियर्स, एम-92/ 1 , एम आई डी सी एरिया वाल जी, औरंगाबाद -431136 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " टाप " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " साईसन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001/231 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मायमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

saison

saisun

ENGINEERS

TOP 10 K.G

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया आता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में है और 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " माम 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10,5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 157)/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक प 388961/ 02-10 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

222

New Delhi , the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 112. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Models described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (7 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating, non - automatic , (Table top type) weighing instrument of " TOP" series of medium accuracy (accuracy class III ) and with brand name " SAISUN" (herein- after referred to as the model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Saisun Engineers , M-92 / 1 , MIDC Area Walji , Aurangabad -431 136 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/ 2001/231 ;

The said model is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimun capacity 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

saisun

TOP 1G

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g'and with the number of verification scale interval (n) in the range 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 157 )/ 2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 223 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 113.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साईसन इंजीनियर्स, एम-92/ 1 , एम आई डी सी एरिया वाल जी, औरंगाबाद -431136 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " पाल " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " साईसन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001 / 232 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा. है। सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी मिनिमाता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के "ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 10,2 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है। के

['मा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.-21 ( 157 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक मा। विज्ञान 224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 113. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Models described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating , non - automatic , (Platform type) weighing instrument of "PAL " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class III) and with brand name " SAISUN" ( herein- after referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Saisun Engineers , M -92 / 1 , MIDC Area Walji , Aurangabad-431 136 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2001 /232;

The said model is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg . and minimum capacity 1kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Heriz alternate current power supply ;

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 300 kg, with verification scak interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 157 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 225 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 114.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट माप और मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फाइन डिजिटल सिस्टम, बी/15-16, अनमोल काम्पलेक्स, भरत पार्टी प्लाट के समीप, एन.एच. 8 , राबड़ी कालोनी, अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एफ एन पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फाइन " है. ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2001/312 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचलित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फ़ार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित्त मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका "" ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के* हैहै जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (49)/2001

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 226

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) 1 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2002

S.O. 114. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic , weighing instrument (Plat form type) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy Class III ) of 'FNP' series with brand name "FINE" ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Fine Digital System , B/15-16, Anmol Complex , Near Bharat Party Plote , N.H. No. 8 , Rabari Colony, Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /2001 /312;

The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) . The maximum capacity is 30kg and minimum capacity 100g . The value of verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The in- strument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 300kg and with number of verifi- cation scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accor- dance with the same principle , design and with the same materials wi . ' which the approved model has been manufo- tured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 49)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director, Legal Metrology 227 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पौष 21 , 1924

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 115.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फाइन डिजिटल सिस्टम, बी/15-16, अनमोल काम्पलेक्स, भरत पार्टी प्लाट के समीप, एन.एच. 8 , राबड़ी कालोनी, अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " एफ एन जे " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फाइन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001 /310 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचलित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 11 कि.ग्रा. औ न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।।

FINE

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्राम से 50 मि. ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा 100 मि.ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (49 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2002

S.O. 115. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic , weighing instrument (tabk top type) belonging to High accuracy (Accuracy Class II ) of ' FNJ ' series with brand name " FINE " ( herein referred to as the model ) manufacturedby M/s . Fine Digital System , B/ 15-16, Anmol Complex, Near Bharat Party Plote, N.H. No. 8, Rabari Colony , Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001 /310;

The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type). The maximum capacity is 11kg and minimum capacity 50g . The value of verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

FINE

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of 36 Section said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with numbers of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50.000 for ' e ' value Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale internal (n) in the range 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (49)/2001

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग 11- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

229 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौप 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 116.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधानं हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फाइन डिजिटल सिस्टम , बी/15-16, अनमोल काम्पलेक्स, भरत पार्टी प्लाट के समीप, एन.एच. 8 , राबड़ी कोलोनी, अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एफ एन जे " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फाइन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001/311 संमनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचलित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. औ. न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की 100 मि.ग्राम से 2 ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मूल्य के लिए 500 से 10,000 मूल्य की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 (49 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 388961/02-11 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) , THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924 :

230

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2002

S.O. 116. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( sce the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the inodel of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type ) belonging to Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy Class III ) with digital display of ' FNT' series with brand name "FINE " ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Fine Digital System , B/ 15-16 , Anmol Complex , Near Bharat Party Plote , N.H. No. 8. Rabari Colony , Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/311:

The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument . The maximum capacity is 20kg . and minimum capacity of 40g. The value of verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range 500 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k . k being positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (49 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 231 [ भाग 11- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 117.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित्त प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रो-वे , बी 1/1 , राम गिरधर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट विट्ठलवाड़ी स्टेशन रोड, विट्ठलवाड़ी जिला थाणे-421003 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एम डब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रो -वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001 / 256 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमाडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 20 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम श्रमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मांडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मूल्य के लिए 500 मि.ग्रा. 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 218 )/2001 ;

पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक मापने 232

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 117. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitled to it by the prescribed authority . is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods οι sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non - automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MWP " series of Medium accuracy ( Accuracy class III) and with brand name " MICRO - WEIGH " ( hereinafter refcrred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s . Micro- Weigh , B1 / 1 / 1 Ram Gridhar Industrial Estate , Vithalwadi Station Road, Vithalwadi , Dist . Thane- 421003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/256 ;

The said model ( figure given) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120kg and minimunt capacity of 400g. The verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and frequency 50 Hertz alternate current power supply:

And further . in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 300kg and with number of verifi- cation scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 % or 5410. k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (218 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग ।। - खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

233

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 118.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रो-वे, बी 1/1 , राम गिरधर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट विट्ठलवाड़ी स्टेशन रोड, विट्ठलवाड़ी द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एम डब्ल्यू डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रोवेट" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2001 / 255 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा 5 ग्राम या अधिक के " ई " मूल्य के लिए 500 से 10,000 मूल्य की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. संः डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 218 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

234

New Delhi , the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 118. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that ( he Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act. 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Centra. Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self - indicating, non -automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MWW" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name "MICRO - WEIGH " ( hercin referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Micro - Weigh , B1 / 1 , Ram Gridhar Industrial Estate . Vithalwadi Station Road, Vithalwadi , Dist . Thane -421003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2001 / 255 ;

The said model ( figure given ) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 12kg and minimum capacity of 40g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and frequency 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of the section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instru- ment of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zéro , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which the approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 218 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

235

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 119.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में, वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टूल टेक, प्लाट संख्या 21 , सी आई ई, गांधी नगर, बाला नगर, हैदराबाद-500037 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एल पी-1000 " श्रृंखला की स्वतःभरण मशीन ( अश्यान द्रव फिलर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टूल टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2001 /313 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल स्वतः भरण मशीन ( अश्यान द्रव फिलर ) है । इसको 2 मिली लीटर से 1000 मिली लीटर या इसके समतुल्य भार के किर्स, भी रेंज में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित किया जा सकता है । यह प्रति मिनट 15-20 पाऊच ( अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन को खनिज जल, दुग्ध, बटर मिल्क, अरक जैसे अश्यान द्रवों को भरे जाने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । यह 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 114 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

236

New Delhi . the 24th December, 2002

S.O. 119. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report subinitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model in respect of automatic filling machine ( non -viscous liquid filler ) of ' LP- 1000 ' serics with brand name "" Tool Tech " ( herein referred to as the model) , manufactured by M/s Tool Tech. Plot No. 21. CIE , Gandhi Nagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad- 500037 and which i assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /2001/313:

DOLTECH

The model is automatic filling machine ( non -viscous liquid fitler ). The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 2ml to 1000ml or in equivalent weight. It can filt 15-20 pouches per minute (maximum ) . The machine is designed to fill non -viscous liquids like mineral water, milk, butter milk . arrack , etc. It operates on 230 volt, 5t) Hertz alternate current power supply.

F. No. WM -21 ( 114 )/2001 ]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director . Legal Metrology [ भाग 11- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

237 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 120.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स टूल टेक, प्लाट संख्या 21 , सी आई ई, गांधी नगर, बाला मगर, हैदराबाद-500037 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एल पी-500 " श्रृंखला की स्वतः भरण मशीन (अश्यान द्रव फिलर ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टूल टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001/314 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

TOOL TECH

उक्त माडल स्वतः भरण मशीन ( अश्यान द्रव फिलर ) है । इसको 2 मि.ली. से 500 मि.ली. में समतुल्य भार में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित किया जा सकता है । यह प्रति मिनट 15-20 पाऊच ( अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन को खनिज जल , दुग्ध, बटर मिल्क, अरक जैसे अश्यान द्रवों को भरे जाने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । यह 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 114 ) / 2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

تو

388961 /02-12 238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi . the 24th December , 2002

S.O. 120. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model in respect of automatic filling machine ( non - viscous liquid filler ) of ' LP- 500 ' series with brand name " Tool Tech " ( herein referred to as the model ) . manufactured by M/s . Tool Tech , Plot No. 21. CIE , Gandhi Nagar , Balanagar , Hyderabad - 500037 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2001 /314;

FOOL TECH

The model is automatic filling machine ( non -viscous liquid filler ) . The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 2ml to 500ml or in equivalent weight. It can fill 15-20 pouches per minute ( maximum ) . The machine is designed to fill non - viscous liquids like mineral water, milk, butter milk , arrack, etc. It operates on 230 volt. 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 114)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

239

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 121.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा मांप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधियों में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ऑटो वेट ट्रांस इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स कार्पोरेशन , प्लाट सं. 13/3515/ ए आई ए/ बी, गणेश कालोनी , विद्यानंगर, हुबली-580021 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ए पी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " आटो वेट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2001 / 320 समनुदेशित किया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

यह माडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है. जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही वर्ग खंड है, जिसकी भुजाएं 600 × 600 मि.मि. हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जकं डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहै ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 293 )/ 2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

240

New Delhi . the 24th December, 2002

S.O. 121. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act. 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Plat form type) with digital indication belonging to Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) of ' APW ' series with brand name "AUTOWEIGHT" ( herein referred to as the model ) manufactured by M/s. Auto-weight Transelectronics Corporation. Plot No. 13/ 3515 /A1A/B . Ganesh Colony , Vidyanagar , Hubli - 580021 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2001/320 ;

The said model ( the figure given ) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) . The maximum capacity is 120kg and minimum capacity 400g . The value of verificațion scale interval ( e ) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The load receptor is of square section of side 600 mm ×600 mm . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply :

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act. the Central Gov- ernment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 300kg and with number of verification seale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10.2 × 10 or 5 × 10k. k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the saine manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

IF. No. WM - 21 (293 ) /2001

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पौष 21 , 1924

241

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 122.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ऑटो वेट ट्रांस "" इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स कार्पोरेशन , प्लाट सं. 13/ 3515 /ए आई ए/ बी, गणेश कालोनी, विद्यानगर, हुबली -580021 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ए के डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, इलेक्ट्रानिक अंकंक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " आटो वेट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2001/319 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । भारग्राही वर्ग खंड है, जिसकी भुजाएं 240 × 240 मि.मि. हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 की रेंज में और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 10,000 कीरेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 293 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

242

New Delhi, the 24th December, 2002

S.O. 122.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non- automatic weighing instrument (table top type) with digital indication belonging to Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) of ' AKW' series with brand name "AUTOWEIGHT " ( herein referred to as the model ) manufactured by M/ s . Autoweight Transelectronics Corporation , Plot No. 13 /3515 /AIA/B , Ganesh Colony , Vidyanagar , Hubli - 580021 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2001/319:

The said model ( the figure given ) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type). The maximum capacity is 12kg and minimum capacity 40g. The value of verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The load receptor is of square section of side 240 mm× 240 mm. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . and with number of verifi- cation scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has bees . manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (293 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003 /पौष 21 , 1924

243

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 123. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कम्पनी लि. , 3-23-14 हिमाशी आई के बुकुरो , तोशिमान्कु टोक्यो 170 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और इन्डलैब इम्पेक्स, पी पी 107 , मोर्य इन्कलेव , पीतमपुरा, दिल्ली -110034 द्वारा भारत में विक्रीत उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 23 ) वाले " ई के जी" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एंड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2002/ 02 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

यह मॉडल अंकक सूचन सहित टेबल टाप प्रकार की अस्वचालित तोलन मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है और जो उच्च ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) की है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि.ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श यूनिट द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 के रेंज में है और 100 मि. ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 10,2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 46) /97 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 27th December, 2002

S.O. 123. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type) with digital indication of " EK - G " series belonging to high accuracy class (accuracy class II ) and witl brand name " AND " ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . A & D Company Ltd. , 3-23-14 Higashi- Ikebukuro. Toshima - ku , Tokyo 170 Japan and marketed in India by M/s Indlab Impex, PP - 107 , Maurya Enclave , Pitampura, Delhi - 110 034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /02/02;

The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing machine of table top type with digital indication of maximum capacity 200g, minimum capacity 200 mg and belonging to high accuracy class (accuracy class II ) . The value ofverification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. The display unit is of Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) type. The instrument operates on 220 V , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verifica- tion scale interval ( n ) in the range 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value to 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (46)/97 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 15 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 124.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है वि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सी ए एस वेइंग इंडिया प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, 568, उद्योग विहार, फेज-5 , गुडगांव-122016 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सी ए एस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002 / 83 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) विकृति मसवी भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान (ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित माडल ६.! विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 के रेंज में है तथा 100 मि. ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है । *

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 151 )/2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 388961/02-13 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21. 1924

246

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 124. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority. is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non- automatic. (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SW" series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name " CAS " manufactured by M/ s . CAS Weighing India Private limited , 568 , Udyog Vihar , Phase V, Gurgaon - 122 016. Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2002/83 ;

The said Model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based weighing instrument with a maxi mum capacity of 10kg and minimunı capacity of 50g. The verification scale interval value (e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply ;

CAS

ZERO

TARE

HOLD

Max 5 Kg Min 10 gm end 5g 7-3

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ` e` value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the saine manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 151 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 247 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 125.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधियों में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ट्रांस डयूसर्ज इण्डिया, बी- III , मायापुरी इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस -1 , दिल्ली-110064 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एल टी एस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लिनियर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001/323 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप ) प्रकार को तोलन उपकरण है और जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) काहै । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

८

LINEAR

ELECTRONIC WEIGHING MACHINE

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की डपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10.000 के रेंज में है और 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान × 10,2 × 105 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (69 ) /98 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञा 248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 125.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sus tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, t... Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic , weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the model ) belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class III ) and of LTS series with brand name ' LINEAR' , manufactured by M/s Transducers India, B - III , Mayapuri Industrial Area . Phase - I , Delhi - 110 064 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/01/323 ;

The said model is a non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 30 kg . minimum capacity 100 g and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class III) . The value of verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . The display unit is of light emitting diode. The instrument operates on 220 V, 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply;

LINEAR

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) ofsection 36 of the said Act , the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval( n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e' value to 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive o negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 69 )/98]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

249

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 126.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और 8 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ट्रांस ड्यूसर्ज इण्डिया , बी- III , मायापुरी इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , फेस -1 , दिल्ली-110064 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एल पी एस" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लिनियर " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2001 /324 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचलित ( प्लेट फार्म ) प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है और जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) का है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श यूनिट का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10. , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 69 )/98 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II-- SLC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 126. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now . therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non- automatic weighing instru- ment (Platform Type ) with digital indication ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (Accuracy Class III ) and of LPS series with brand name ' LINEAR' , manufactured by M/ s Transducers India , B - 1II . Mayapuri Industrial Area , Phase - 1 , Delhi - 110 064 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 01/324 :

The said model is a non - automatic weighing instrument ( platform type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 200 kg . minimum capacity 400g and belonging to medium accuracy elass (accuracy class III ) . The value of verification scale interval ( e) is 20g. The display unit is of light emitting diode. The instrument operates on 230 V , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments o similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 300kg and with number on verification scale interval (n ) in the range 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value to 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k οι 5 × 10 % , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accor- dance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufac- hured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 69 )/ 98 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director . Legal Metrology 251 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 127.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओसा इंडस्ट्रियल प्राडक्टस प्रा. लि. पो बा नं. 42, ओसा काप्लेक्स, जगाधरी रोड, अम्बाला केन्ट-133001 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " आई एंड डी टी" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इन्डोसा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002/ 75 समनुदेशित किया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचलित तोलन उपकरण है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 0.1 ग्राम है । इसमें एक अधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1000 से कम ( एन ≤ 1000 ) तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 % या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 49 ) /2000]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 252

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 127. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instru- ment with digital display (Table Top ) belonging to medium accuracy (accuracy class III ) of ' IND -T ' sereis with brand name "INDOSAW" ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Osaw Industrial Products Pvt . Ltd. , P.O. Box No. 42. Osaw Complex , Jagdhri Road, Ambala Cantt - 133001 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2002/75 ;

The said nodel is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument. The maximum capacity is 1000g and minumum capacity of 2g . The value of verification scale interval (e ) is 0.1g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrumen operates on 230 volts . 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with having maximum capacity up to 50 kg with number of verification scale interval ( n) upto 10,000 ( n≤ 10,000 ) and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k. k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (49 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 253 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

[भाग II-- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 128.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओसा इंडस्ट्रियल प्राडक्टस प्रा. लि. पो. बा. नं. 42 , ओसा काप्लेक्स , जगाधरी रोड़ , अम्बाला केन्ट-133001 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " आई एन डी टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इन्डोसा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2002/76 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक अधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. सी. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल क. इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन थाले ऐसे पोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिमांता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 10000 से कम ( एनं ≤ 10000 ) तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 10 के, 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 49 ) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 388961 /02- 254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 128. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurcs ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument with digital display ( Platform Type) belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy Class III ) of ' IND -P ' sereis with brand name " INDOSAW" ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s . Osaw Industrial Products Pvt . , Ltd. , P.O. Box No. 42. Osaw Complex, Jagadhri Road , Ambala Cantt- 133001 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2002/ 76;

The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument . The maximum capacity is 50kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The value of verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with having maximum capacity upto 300kg with number o verification scale (n) upto 10,000 ( n≤ 10,000 ) and with ' e' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (49)/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology 255 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 129.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मात्रक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मांडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रो टेक सिस्टम्स, दुर्गा होटल के पीछे- पुणे- बंगलौर रोड, कराड ( मल्कापुर ) जिला सतरा ( महाराष्ट्र ) , द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थत वर्ग 2 ) वाले " एम जे डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित इलेक्ट्रानिक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रो टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002/91 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमाडल ( आकृति देखें ) विकृति मापी भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि.ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान (ई ) का मान 12 कि.ग्रा. तक 1 ग्रा. और 12 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक तथा 22 कि.ग्रा. तक के रेंज में 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 के रेंज में है और 100 मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 137 ) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

256

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 129. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic . ( Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MJW " series of High accuracy ( Accuracy class 11) and with brand name " MICO - TECH " manufacturedby M/s Micro - ech Systems , Behind Durga Hotel Pune- Bangalore Road. Karad ( Malkapur District ) . Satra. ( Maharashtra) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2002/91:

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based dual range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 22 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval value (c ) is 1g upto 12kg and 2g in the range above 12kg and upto 22kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply :

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Governmeat hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for'e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' c' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle. design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM-21 ( 137 ) /2000]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY . Director . Legal Metrology 257 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौप 21 , 1924

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2002

का.आ. 130.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रो टेक सिस्टम्स, दुर्गा होटल के पीछे- पुणे- बंगलौर रोड, कराड ( मल्कापुर ) जिला सतारा ( महाराष्ट्र ) , द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एम टी टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रो टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2002/ 9% समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) विकृति मापी भारं सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि माडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, इसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 के रेंज में है और 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 1010 ,के, 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 137 )/2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 258

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi, the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 130. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic. ( Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MTT " series of Medium accuracy (accuracy class III ) and with brand name " MICRO - TECH " manufactured by M/s. Micro -tech Systems , Behind Durga Hotel , Pune- Bangalore Road. Karad (Malkapur) District, Satara (Maharashtra ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2002/92;

The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ' e ' value is Ig . It has a tart device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighin result . The instrument operates on 230 volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for'e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 fore ' e ' value of 5mg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 137 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

259 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 131.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रो टेक सिस्टम्स, दुर्गा होटल के पीछे- पुणे- बंगलौर रोड, कराड़ ( मल्कापुर ) जिला सतारा ( महाराष्ट्र ) , द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एम पी टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित इलेक्ट्रनिक अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रो टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002/93 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) विकृति मापी भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 137 )/2000 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21. 1924

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ії) )

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 131. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36. ofthe said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non- automatic . (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MPT series ofMediun accuracy ( accuracy class III ) and with brand name " MICRO - TECH " manufactured by M/s Micro- Tech Systems , Behind Durga Hotel . Pune-Bangalore Road . Karad (Malkapur ) District . Satara . ( Maharashtra ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2002/93 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based dual range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval value ( e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weigh- ing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts , 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply :

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 300kg . and with mumber of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for'c ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 % . 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10 , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved model have been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 137)/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY . Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

261

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2002

का.आ. 132.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गय। है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स परफेक्ट इन्डस्ट्रीज सी बी-210 नरायणा , रिंग रोड, नई दिल्ली -110028 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " पी ई टी पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " परफेक्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2002/73 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदिर मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. मे 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50000 के रेंज में और 100 मि. ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 146 )/2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप नि 388961/02-15 [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

262

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 132. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Mcasures ( Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non automatic. (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PETP " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class 11) and with brand name "PERFECT " manufactured by M/ s Perfect Industries , CB- 210 , Naraina , Ring Road. New Delhi - 110028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2002/73:

The said Model (the figure given below ) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maxi- mum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 250g . The verification scale interval value (c) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts , 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of said Section. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50.000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 146 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director, Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपुत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

263

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2002

का.आ. 133.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स परफेक्ट इन्डस्ट्रीज , सी बी-210, नरायणां रिंग रोड, नई दिल्ली-110028 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " पी एफ पी एफ" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " परफेक्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2002/74 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) भार सेल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिसंसे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 10,2 10 * या 5 × 10 है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 146 )/2000]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ) 264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 133. Whcreas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non- automatic. ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PFPF " series of medium accuracy (Accu- racy class III ) and with brand name "PERFACT " manufacturedby M/s . Perfact Industries, CB - 210 , Naraina, Ring Road . New Delhi - 1100028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /2002/ 74;

The said model ( figure given below) is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100kg and minimum capacity of 200g. The verification scale interval value ( e) is 10g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts, and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply :

Perfock

Further . in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of said section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 300 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 146 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology 265 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौय 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2002

का.आ. 134.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पृथ्वी अम्को डिजिटल निकट, चापसानी स्कूल, प्लाट नं. 50 , जवाहर नगर, जोधपुर-342003 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " पी एस टी" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पृथ्वी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /2002/78 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमाडल ( आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन् प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल क. विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 है जिसमें ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[फा. स. डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 209 )/2000 ]

: पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART I- SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

266

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 134. Whereas the Central Government . after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate serviec under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non- automatic . (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PST " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " PRATHVI " manufactured by M/ s Prathvi Amco Digitals , Near . Chopsani School , Plot No. 50. Jawahar Nagar. Jodhpur - 342003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2002 / 78 ;

The said model ( figure given below ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 50kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval value (e ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts. 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . accuracy and performance of sante series with maximum capacity upto 300kg and with number of verification seale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 110,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , ' k' being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which the approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 209 )/ 2000) ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director , Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

267 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 135.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधियों में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पृथ्वी अम्कोडिजिटल , निकट चापसानी स्कूल, प्लाट नं. 50, जवाहर नगर, जोधपुर-342003 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2.) वाले " पी एस टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पृथ्वी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2002/77 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 11 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय परकार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50000 के रेंज में और 100 मि. ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 के 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 209) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 135. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of. sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non - automatic , (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PST " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name " PRATHVI " manufactured by M/ s . Prathvi Amco Digitals , Near Chopsan School . Plot No. 5t) , Jawahar Nagar , Jodhpur - 342003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2002/77;

The said model ( the figure given below) is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 11kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval value ( e) is 1 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts , 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that his certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accu- racy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the sarne materials with which the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (209 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology भाग 1-3 ( 1 )

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11, 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

269

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 136. केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत की गई रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि प्रवत रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दो गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल अथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः अव केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मेसनं फैलट्रान स्कल्स. ए १ , जगत नगर, सोसाइटी दिनेश चैम्बर के लापन, आन खोदीयार कंगन स्टोर तोलंका, बापू नगर, अहमदाबाद-380024, गुजगन द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वांनेि और सी ई श्रृंखला के अस्वत्चालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कैल्ट्रान स्काल्स " है जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/ 09 / 2001 /201 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

यह माहल ( आकृति देखें ) अंकक सूचन सहित टेवल टाप प्रकार का अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है और यह मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थतत वर्ग 3 ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है प्रदर्ग उकाई प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के उसे अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता २० कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल वा विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एम ) की अधिकतम संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 में 10,000 के रेंज में और 5 ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 10 और 5 10 है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक यः शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

['फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (143 )/99 ] पी. ए. कृष्णमूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3889 GL702-16 [ PART 11--SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi . the 27th December , 2002

S.O. 136. Whereas the Central Government . after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed amhority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures tApproval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sastamed use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 7 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with dignal indication ( herein referred to as the model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class ifi ) of Cf. series with brand name CALTRON SCALEX' , manufactured by M/s Caltron Scalex , A- 1 . Jagatnagar Soci- 21. Opposite Dinesh Chamber . On Khodiyar Kangan Store , Tolnaka. Bapunagar . Ahmedabad- 380024, Gujarat , and wiich is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 01/201 :

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type) with deztual indication of maximum capacity 30 kg . minimum capacity 100g and belonging to Medium accuracy class ( accu razy class 111) The value of verification scale interval ( e ) is 5 g. The display mit is of light emitting diode . The instru- tment operates on 230 volts . 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply:

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of the said of section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , acentres and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale intersalon the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value 100mg to 2g and with number of ver'fication scale interval (n) in the range 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value to 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10 % , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero. manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the sante materials which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 143 )/99 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director . Legal Metrology [भाग 1 ]--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ . 137.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण आसनसोल (संदर्भ संख्या122/ 1999) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 27/ 99-आई . आर. ( सी-II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002

17 S. O. 137. In pursuance of Section of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 122/1999) of the Central Govern- ment Industrial Tribunal - Cum - Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-2002 .

[No. L- 22012/27/ 99 - IR ( C - II )] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL GOVERNMENT TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Shri Ramjee Pandey , Presiding Officer .

REFERENCE NO. 122 OF 1999 .

PARTIES : Agent , Sripur Colliery, ECL Management Vrs .

Sh . Sirajul Haque & four others Workmen .

REPRESENTATION :

For the management Shri B. Chowdhury , Advocate .

For the workmen ( union) : Shri S. K. Pandey, Chief General Secretary, Koyala Mazdoor Congress .

Industry : Coal State West Bengal .

Dated , the 29th October , 2002.

3889 GI /2002-17.

271

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003//पोप 21 , 1924

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , Govt . of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 22012/ 27/ 99 / IR ( CM - II) dated 30-07-99 /3-8-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of sripur Colliery in not converting Sh . Sirajul Haque and four others (Viz Sh . Anup Sutra dhar , Sh . Ranjit Bouri , Babloo Mia , Md . Firoj Alam) ih T. R. Job is justified ? If not , to what relief are the workmen concerned entitled ? "

After receiving the reference summons were sent to both the parties in response to which both the parties appeared through their respective representatives Shri B. Chowdhury , advocate appeared for the management and Shri S. Κ. Pandey, Cheif General Secretary of Koyala Mazdoor Congress appeared for the workmen . Both the parties prayed for time for filing written statement and time was allowed . When the case was pending for filing written statement by the parties both the parties filed a joint petition for settlement . The petition for settlement is duly signed by both the parties . Shri S. K. Pandey Chief General Secretary of Koyala Mazdoor Congress has signed on behalf of the union and the Agent of the Colliery and Shri B. Chowdhury , Advocate , have signed on behalf of the management . Since both the parties have settled the dispute amicably the reference is answered and the award is passed in terms of settlement . The petition for settlement will form part of the award .

RAMJEE PANDEY , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर , 2002

काःग्र . 138.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियन, 1947 (1947 का 14) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी. आई . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बोच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/1997) को प्रकाशित करतो है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 95/ 96-आई . आर . ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी 272 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924 PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ) New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002

ment S. O. 138.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 57/1997 ) ) of the Central Govern- Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FC1 and their workman. which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-2002 .

[No. L- 22012/ 95 / 96- JR ( C - II ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD .

In the matter of a reference under sec . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947,

Reference No. 57 of 1997

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the Management of Food Corporation of India .

AND

Their Workmen .

PRESENT : Shri S. H. Kazmi , Presiding Officer .

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers Shri M. A. Raza , District Manager .

For the Workman Shri V. Kumar,

Authorised Representative .

State Patna .

Industry : Food .

Dated , the 25th November , 2002 .

AWARD

workman at Food Storage Depot , Air Strip Panchananpur , Gaya w.e.f. September , 1977 and he is still working. It has been said that w.ef February , 1984 the concerned workman had been retrenched from the service in violation of Sec. 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 against which he raised a dispute before the A.L.C. ( C) . Hazaribagh which was later transferred to R.L.C. (C), Patna, During the conciliation proceeding there, it is said , a settlement was arrived at and the concerned workman accordingly was reinstated in the job without back wages with a further condition that all other benefits shall be given to him after reinstatement as are being available by the workman employed during 1977. It has been said that other workmen who were working since 1977 and who were employed even in the year 1986 have already been regularised as watch- man in Class - IV post in terms of Headquarter's circular dated 6-5-1987 , in the year 1988-89 but the concerned workmen was not regularised and he is still working as Class - IV workmen at District Office , FCI , Gaya. Further , the case is that the concerned workinen is performing the job of Messenger , Watchman and Sweeper, but he is being kept as . casual workmen inspite of vacancy of Class - IV post , to deprive him from regulari- sation so that the management may take more work from him by paying meagre amount as wages . No other benefits are being extended to him. It is also the case that the concerned workman was performing 8 to 10 hours job daily in anticipation of his regularisation and also in apprehension of his retrenchment and further he is doing identical job of regualr watchman and messenger but he is being paid Rs . 500 to Rs . 600 per month though regular Class - IV work- man is getting more than Rs . 4000/- per month besides other benefits like leave , medical, lunch , LTC conveyance etc. , but the , concerned workman is not being given those benefits . Lastly , it is said, that the action of the management is not justified and the concerned workman is entitled to get seniority , regularisation and all other benefits since 1977 and also the payment of wages and other benefits equal to regular Class - IV workman.

By Order No. L - 22012/ 95/ 96 - I . R. (C - II ) dated 19-12-97 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India , Patna in not regularising the services of Sh . Jamuna Thakur is legal and justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

2. Precisely , the case of the concerned work- man is that he was employed in tially as casual

3. The management's case , on the other hand, as disclosed in its written statement is that the concerned workman was working as casual labour in the year 1984 and when the Food Storage Depot , Gaya got closed the service of the concerned workman was dispensed with in the month of February, 1984. The workman raised an industrial dispute which was amicably settled in course of conciliation proceeding and a settle- ment dated 6-11-1989 was entered into between 273 [भाग II-- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्त्र . जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

gations made in the written statement and reit erated its stand that the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief whatsoever in view of settlement , circular etc.

4. It is apparent from the stands taken on behalf of respective sides , precisely given above , that the main issue or question involved tha requires consideration is whether having worked as casual workman discharging the duties of a Class - IV workman continuously for a consider- able long period or for years together , the work- man deserves to be regularised in the service of the management or not.

5. In support of their respective stands both the sides have led their oral as well as documen- tary evidence , the relevancy and significance of which would be considered in course of the discussions made hereinafter :

6. As the position stands , it is not denied that the concerned workman had been working in Gaya office of the management as a casual workman since prior to 1984 and in the year 1984 when he was dis- engaged or was stopped from his work , he raised industrial dispute and during the pendency of the conciliation proceed- ing before the R.L.C. ( C ) , Patna a Tri - partite settlement was arrived at on the basis of which in the year 1989 the workman was reinstated but without back wages and since then he has been working but still as a casual workman without having been regularised.

Now as per the management the concerned workman cannot be regularised mainly due to the reason that on the strength of settlement the workman had been reinstated as a casual workman and not as a regular employee and so after that statement which was full and final , it is no more available to the workman to claim regularisation . Further , according to the manage- ment there is ban on recruitment and as far as the said circular of 1987 is concerned , since the workman was not on the roll of the management on 2-5-86- the benefit arises out of the same could not have been extended to him. It is also the stand of the management that the workman cannot be absorbed as a regular workman and there is no vacancy available .

the parties in presence of the Conciliation Officer . Further , the case is that as per the terms of the said settlement the concerned work- man was to be provided employment as casual labour and his condition of service in furture was to be the same as was existing before while working as casual labour . It has been said that the said settlement is binding , legal and valid and during the subsistence of the said settlement no reference can be made modifying its terms and conditions and further the said settle- ment continued to govern the conditions of service and no clause has been incorporated in the se lement for regularisation of his service in future as Class - III or Class - IV employee . Further , it has been said that the Government of India has passed the order dated 21-8-95 under clause 6 (2) of Food Corporation , Act , 1964 issuing directions to the managment of F.C.I. not to create any post and not to fill up any vacancy and so there is complete ban on providing employment to any workman on regular basis for filting any permanent vacancy or to create any new post . So there is no scope for regularisation of any casual workman who himself had accepted the conditions of service in a statutory settlement with the approval of the Central Government . It has also been said that the concerned workman was not on the roll of the management on 6-5-1987 and he was not working as casual employee against any permanent vacant post and as such there is no scope of regularisation in pursuance of the circular dated 6-5-1987 and moreover that circular was issued for temporary purpose with clear stipulation that in future no casual employee/labour should be employed in the establishment . It is said that the concerned workman after his engagement in pursuance of the settlement performed the duties of fetching water in buckets and storing the same in the pitchers to be used as drinking water and he also does some sweeping and cleaning job in the office , tables and all the jobs performed by him takes 2 to 3 hours a day. He is engaged in daily rated basis and he is paid wages as per provisions of Minimum Wages Act. It is also said that the management is having Class - IV or Class - III post like Watchman and others and such posts are sanctioned by , the competent authority and recruitment to such posts are to be made by following Employment Exchange procedure and Government circulars and casual workers cannot be regularised on such post .

In its rejoinder to the workman's written statement also the management has parawise denied or controverted the averinents or alle-

All the aforesaid contentions have been em- phatically challenged on behalf of the workman and it has been contended that the management most unfairly has been interpreting settlement , circular etc. in its own way and for its own advantage solely in order to deny the claim of the workman . It is also submitted that several work- man who were similarly situated have already [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) 274 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

been regularised either eariler or even recently and there is still lot of vacancies available in Class - IV with the management .

contains the stipulation that in pursuance of his reinstatement the concerned workman would the getting or would be provided all the benefits or facilities as are being availed by the workman employed during 1977 or extended to those who were working since 1977. True it is that it is not mentioned specifically that reinstatement would be as regular employee but at the same time it is not mentioned anywhere that consequent upon his reinstatement as a casual workman the workman would never claim is regularisation or would remain as a casual workman for all time to come even after the lapse of more than adecade or uptil his retirement . The document also speaks about the claim of back wages and conferring benefits upon the workman which are being extended to other employees working since 1977 and this shows that upon reinstatement the workman was to be treated not like ordinarily casual Class - IV workman , rather more or less like a regular workman , in terms of benefits . Though the management is interpreting the said document in its own way but interestingly nothing has come out on its behalf even during the argument as to how and in what manner it interprets the contents of para 3 of the said document (Ext . M - 1 ) and conferring benefit means what and further why even after such stipulation the workman is getting the same wages without any additional benefits and further there is no suggestion as to why " benefits " cannot be taken to include the benefits of conferring the status of perma- nency also . In short , the management's aforesaid stand can only be noticed to be rejected and the said document of settlement cannot be construed in the manner as suggested by the management . It is unjust and unreasonable to suggest that what was stipulated under the said settlement was that the workman would remain a casual workman for all times to come and he would not be claiming his regularisation during the passage of time .

7. As it is noticed above , it is an admitted.fact that earlier when the concerned workman was re- trenched ordis - engaged from his service in the year 1984 he had challenged the said action of the manage- ment by raising industrial dispute and during the pendecy of the conciliation proceeding before the R.L.C. ( C ) a settlement was arrived at in terms of which the concerned workınan was reinstated in the year 1989 without back wages . The copy of the said settlement has been filed in the instant case on behalf of both the sides and they are marked subsequently as Ext . M - 1 and Ext . W- 1 . Accordingto the management after such settlement it is no more available for the workman to raise the claim for making him permanent . The management's witness (MW- 1) in his evidence has said that as per the sele- ment there is no stipulation that the management would regularise the workman as Class - IV employee and further has said that as per the settlement there is no scope of re - opening the matter . MW -2 has claimed to have signed the Tri - partite settlement dated 6-11-89 before the R.L.C. ( C) , Patna on behalf of the F.C.1 . management regarding the concerned workman . Further , as regards the said settlement he has simply stated that the terms of settlement have been complied with by the F.C.I. management MW-3 though during his examination - in- chief has not stated anything about the settlement but in course of his cross - examination he has said that he knows that as per settlement dated 6-11-89 the concerned workman was to get all the benefits from the year 1977 except back wages . It is indicated here that para 3 of the said settlement specifically contained the aforesaid stipulation . MW-4 , the last witness of the management , has said that there was a settle- ment with respect to the concerned workman prior to the present disputes and as per that settlement the management has complied with its obligation. In the aforesaid regard the workman himself, on the other hand , in course of his evidence as WW- 1 has a said that according to the said settlement he was reinstated in the job without back wages but other benefits were to be given to him according to that settlement . Apart from the fact that he has not been regularise he does not get other benefits , like , leave , lunch , LTC etc. He has further said that according to the said settle inent he should have been regularised as regular Class - IV employee from 1989 and he should have been paid salary which a regular Class - IV employee is entitled to .

8. As far as circular dated 6-5-87 ( Ext . M- 2) or (Ext . W- 3 ) is concerned both the sides have put forward their respective stands emphatically as mentioned above . The management's stand is that the concerned workman was not on the roll either on 2-5-86 or 6-5-87 and as such there was no scope for his regularisation in pursuance of that circular . The workman's stand on the other hand upon the said circular is that the same does not contemplate and it is nothing provided thereunder that for exten- ding the benefit of the said circular a workman must be on the roll of the management on 2-5-86 and simply the requirement as per the said circular was to ensure as to whether a workman has already completed three months working on or before 2-5-86 or not.

The said document of the settlement (Ext . M- 1 ) or ( Ext.W- 1 ) clearly speaks about reinstatement without back wages and further para 3 of the same 275

भारत का राजपत्त्र जनवरी 11, 2003/ पौष 21, 1924

[भःग 11--खंड 3 ( ii) ]

was issued for temporary purpose and for a shor period with clear stipulation that in future no casual labour / employee should be employed in any estab- lishment and thereafter there was a ban in existence . This contention does not have much force . It appears from circular No. 38/96 dated 9-9-96 which was regarding appointment of casual /daily rated workers to entry level Category - III or IV posts , that the same contains the mention of con- fidential letter dated 24-8-92 which was in respect. of considering the genuine left over cases who could not be considered earlier for consideration in terms ofBoard's decision dated 24-2-1987.. Instruction was made therein to regularise the services of all casual / daily rated workers who have continuously worked for more than three months on the cut- off date of 2-5-86 and are fulfilling the conditions prescribed in confidential letter dated 6-5-87. So it is evident that by circular of 1992 the benefit of circular of 1987 was extended to some left over cases also . Therefore , if not earlier , then it shows that at least in terms of that circular of 1992 the benefit could have been extended to the workman as he had completed much more than 90 days of working as casual workmen on or before 2-5-86 specially when several other workmen were regularised either on the basis of settlement of the award. The management's witness (MW- 2 ) has clearly stated that even in 1996 several workmen were regularised .

In para 4 of the said circular it is provided that the benefit of the said circular is to be availed by those who have completed three months period of service as on 2-5-86 and possessed the requisite qualification etc. Quite apparently , as such , there is no mention that one must be on the roll of the management on 2-5-86 for being considered , as suggested from the side of the management . Rather the management's own witness (MW- 1 ) has stated in his evidence after going through the said circular that there is no mention in the same that the workman must be on the roll on 2-5-86. But according to him , it interprets like this . No such interpretation can reasonably be given and the said circular cannot be narrowly construed so as to confine it to something which is not specifically provided therein . Furthermore , in course of the argument copies of several awards of this Tribunal as well as other Tribunals have been produced on behalf of the workman to show that even those workmen were regularised who were not on the roll on 2-5-86 and earlier to that date either they had been retrenched ordis - engaged. Some of such awards are the awards dated 17-9-96 passed by C.G.I.T. No. 2, Dhanbad in Reference No. 94/95 , award dated 6-5-97 passed by C.G.I.T. No. 1 , Dhanbad in Reference No. 122/96 , award dated 9-10-96 passed by C.G.I.T. No. 1 , Dhanbad in Reference No. 29/92 and award dated 6-10-97 passed by C.G.I.T. , Calcutta in Reference No. 31/94 . In all those awards cited before this Tribunal , in appears , that the said circular was also considered for granting relief to the workman .

During the argument from the side of the manage- ment also the copies of the two awards of C.G.I.T. No. 2 , Dhanbad were produced but quite evidently those are quite distinguishable on facts and in no way the same help the management as far as its aforesaid contentions are concerned in regard to the inter- pretation of the aforesaid circular .

In the instant case the workman had aleady comple- ted several years of continuous working till 1984 when he was retrenched or dis - engaged and thereafter at the time when the said circular came into existence he was pursuing the dispute raised by him in respect of the said action of the management and ultimately on the basis of the settlement arrived at in course of the conciliation proceedings he was reinstated though without back wages but with clear stipulation that he would be availing all the benefits which were being extended to the workmen who were working since 1977. Moreover , the claim of the workman is not solely based upon the aforesaid circular , rather the same has been show as one of the circumstances in his favour .

9. Though the attempt has been made on behalf of the management to show through its witnesses that the concerned workman worked as waterboy or water carrier and only for 2 to 3 hours each day , but those witnesses in course of their own evidence have failed to establish , the same, rather their state- ments support the workman's stand on the aforesaid aspect . As far as MW - 1 and MW -2 are concerned they have not stated anything on the said aspect . MW-3 in his evidence has said that the concerned workman is doing the job of water carrier and also bringing stationery and other articles from section to section . According to him , he is also being engaged for bringing tea and doing other miscellaneous work also . Further , according to him , he has got no full day's work . In course of his evidence also he has mentioned about the works of carrying of files and stationery from one place to another place etc. In cross- examination he has accepted that the concerned workman is getting wages much less compared to regular Class - IV like messenger , sweeper etc. and has further admitted that no other benefits given to regular employee is allowed to the workman . So it is clear from his evidence that the workman was not only discharging the work of water carrier rather at the same time he had been performing the jobs of messenger and cleaner also apart from other Further stand of the management in respect of the said circular as noticed above , is that the said circular [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 276 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

to be in existence on 31-8-2002 was that in Bihar Region as on the said date there was 145 vacancies in Class - IV under the management. During the arguments from the side of the management also by showing a document or chart , attempt was made to show existing position of vacancy but the same does not appear to be of much significance as the same appears to have been prepared on All India basis and that does not confine to the Bihar Region with which we are concerned . Secondly in the chart appened to the said document the latest Category - IV staff position has been mentioned , but the samedoes not contain as to what is the existing position of the vacancy or whether vacancy in Class- IV post existed or not . As such , in view of the aforesaid the management has failed to convince that there is no vacancy on which the concerned workman can be absorbed..

ment. miscellaneous job . MW-4 during his examination- in-chief has simply said that the concerned workman used to bring drinking water for the employees of F.C.I. and then in his cross - examination he has said that the concerned workman does not remain in the office from 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. Accordingto him , he supplies water and cleans the tables etc. Thereafter he has said that although he works 2 to 3 hours per day but he is paid full day's wages as per the settle- Butwhen another question was put to him in that regard he replied that he does not remember if his attendance is for whole day or 2 to 3 hours . He also appears to have stated that it is not a fact that the concerned workman only supplies drinking water rather he opens lock of the office , cleans the office and at the time of closing of the office he locks the door of the office . It is evident from the state- ment of this witness also that though initially he has stated that the concerned workman used to bring drinking water only but later he mentioned about.. the other jobs being done also by the concerned workman. Further at one place he has stated about duties of 2 to 3 hours only per day . But thereafter he candidly accepted that he does not remember if the workman's attendance is for whole day or 2 to 3 hours only. The workman , on the other hand , in his evidence has clearly stated that his duty in the office is rightfrom the opening of the office till closure and he has been performing the job of messenger and cleaner and also the job of watchman in the night in the absence of watchman.

As such from the aforesaid nature of evidence it can only be gathered that the workman has been working for the whole day and discharging the duties of sweeper , messenger etc. and is also performing the other miscellaneous job which are considered to be the job of Class - IV employees .

11. Out of few other documents filed on behalf of the workman. Ext. W- 2 is a letter addressed to the Senior Regional Manager , F.C.I. Region Office Patna and sent by District Manager . By way of the said letter the District Manger sought permission to enter into a settlement before the A.L.C. ( C) Patna on 23-12-94 for regularisation of services of the concerned workman as regular Class - IV employec with immediate effect without any back wages . Ext.W - 8 is a letter dated:15-10-93 again sent by the District Manager to Sr. Regional Manager , FCI . In the said letter request was made that the case of the concerned workman may be considered for regularisation and necessary decision be conveyed . Ext. W-9 is yet another letter dated 3-2-95 addressed to the Zonal Manager , East F.C.I. , Calcutta . By way of the said letter recommendation was made to examine case of the concerned workman at Zonal level and to issue necessary guideline in the matter . Ext.W-7 is the letter dated 11-11-90 addressed to the District Manager , Gaya and sent from the side of the Senior Regional Manager. By way of the said letter retrenchment of the concerned workman was not advised in view of the facts and prevailing circum- stances . All the aforesaiddocuments were proved in course of evidence by none other than the manage- ment's witness himself, namely, MW- 2 . It is men- tioned therein that retrenchment of Jamuna Thakur , the concerned workman may not be held bonafide . It emerges out of those documents that even as per higher authorities of the management also the work- man's claim for regularisation was genuine and accordingly they made recommendation for regulari- sation of the concerned workman and also songht permission for entering into settlement before the Conciliation . Officer and further they were of the view that it would not be proper to retrench the concerned workman . Inspite of all those develop- ments , it seems that the management remained 10. It is also the contention of the management that there is no vacancy available in Class - IV and as such it is not possible to absorb the concerned workman as a permanent workman in that colliery . Exts . W- 5 , W - 5/1 , W - 5/ 2 and W-5 / 3 are the documents putforward on behalf of the workman to show the Staff position as on 30-11-88 , 31-12-94, 31-10-95 and 31-1-97 . All those documents bear the signature and seal of the Asstt. Manager (Personnel) , F.C.1 . Regional Office , Patna (Bihar ) . Out of the same it is evident that as on the aforesaid dates sufficient number of vacancies in Class - IV were in existence in Bihar Region. In course of arguments also from the side of the workman one such document has been filed containing the statement showing sufficient existing vacancy position of Bihar Region as on 31-8-2002. This document also bears the signature of the aforesaid authority of the management . It is clear from the said document that the position as found [भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11, 2003/ पौष 21 , 192.1

277

and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-2002 .

[No. L- 22025/ 1 /2002 - IR(C- II) N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer rigid and adament in its approach and was not at all inclined to take up the case of the concerned work- man for favourable consideration and tried to justify its action by putting forward the interpretation as per its own liking of several documents , such as , settlement , circular etc:

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT , VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT : Sri Y. Dhilleswara Rao , B.A. , LL.B.

Chairman and Presiding Officer Dated: 31st Day of October , 2002 I.T.I.D. (C) 54/2001

BETWEEN :

12. In view of all the aforesaid considerations and discussions based on the materials on record it can well be concluded that the concerned workman who is still working as casual workman under the management since more than a decade , deserves to be regularised as Class- IV workman. from the date of the order of the reference i.e. w.eaf: 19-2-97 and further he deserves to get all the benefits and privi- leges which are being enjoyed by or are admissible to a regular Class - IV employee.

13. The award is , thus , rendered as hereunder:

K. Abraham . S/ o. Philip , D. No. 14-332 , Lakshminagar , Gopalapatnam. Visakhapatnam -27.

..Petitioner/Workman

AND

Ferro Scrap Nigam Limited (A Govt . of India .Undertaking) Inside Visakhapatnam Stoel Plant , Visakhapatnam 530 031 Rep . by the Dy. General Manager .

Respondent/Management The action of the management of Food Corporation of India , Patna , in not regularising the services of the concerned workman , Jamuna Thakur , is not legal and justified and the concerned workman deserves to be regularised as Class- IV employee in the services of the management . Consequently the management is hereby directed to regularise the services of the concerned workman w.e.f. 19-2-1997 within 60 days from the date of publication of the award. The concerned workman would also be required to be provided all the consequential benefits as admissible to a Class - IV employee .

However , there would be no order as to cost . S. H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर , 2002

This is an application by the petitioner/workmanu under Sec . 2A(2 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, to declare action of the management removing the workman from servico , is illegal and consequently pass an award directing reinstatement of the peti- tioner with continuity of service and back wages .

This dispute coming on for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri D. V. S. N. Murthy , Advo- cate for workman and of M/ s . Saibaba & Srinivas , Advocates for management , upon hearing the argu- ments of both sides and, on porusing the entire material on record , the court passed the following :

का. आ. 139.--श्रौद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय एफ. एस . एन.. एल . प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण विशाखापटनम ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.टो. आई . डो . (सी) 5.4/ 2001) को प्रकाशित करतो है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

AWARD

[सं . एल 22025/1/ 2002-म्राई. आर . (सी-II) ] एन. ी . केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002

S.O. 1:39 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1.T.I.D. (C ) 54/2001 ) of the Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Visakhapatnam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FSNL

1. In brief the petitioner's claim is that he joined respondent company as Dumper Load Operator in December , 1990. On 25-5-98 Sri B. B. Prasad , Manager , (Opation) lodged first infomation report with the police , alleging one P. Trinadharao , who is President of the Union, demanded for withdrawal of transfer orders issued by the managementto 4 cmp- loyees of the management . In the said first infor- mation report , name of the petitioner was also impli cated though the petitioner was not actually present at the time of alleged incident . Sri B. B. Prasad , 278

[PART I- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THU GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

Manager (Operation) who is also disciplinary autho- rity, suspended the petitioner on 7-5-1998 . Subse quently, charge sheet was issued to the petitioner on 2-6-98 allegeing that ( 1 ) the petitioner assaulted or used abused language or intimidated officers of the management company, within the company premises , (2) that he wrongfully restrained managerial personnel with a viewto pressurise to concede to the demand and (3) that he attempted to commit acts of mis- conduct as alleged in charges 1 and 2. The petitioner submitted his explanationto the charge sheet. That enquiry officer gave his findings holding the petitioner was not present at the time of the incident but the enquiry officer held the petitioner was associated with the group concerned with the incident from the evening of that day. Findings of the said enquiry officer are biased and more in the form of surmises and conjectures . That the criminal case No. 317/98 wherein the petitioner was shown as accused, ended in acquittal. The enquiry officer committed error in relying on the statements of Sri B. B. Prasad and that of the Sub -Inspector of police . The petitioner submitted his explanation after receipt of the enquiry report but the same was not considered by the manage- ment . Management issued proceedings on 27-10-2000 removing the petitioner from service with effect from 27-10-2000 , besides treating the period of suspension as absent .

2. On 25-5-98 the petitioner was in the " B " shift commencing from 14.00 hrs . But the management believed that the petitioner was present at the time of alleged incident on 25-5-98 . The petitioner was falsely implicated and the punishment awarded is shockingly disproportionate and unjust . The last drawn salary of the petitioner was Rs . 5,291 /- per month.

3. Management filed counter denying all the alle- gations specifically . It was contended that the peti- tion is not maintainable without exhausting the remedies provided under the Standing Orders . That there is a constant complaint to the effect the work- man was terrorising the officers . That on 25-5-98 at 11.30 A.M. , employees of the management com- pany along with outsiders assaulted officers including Sri B. B. Prasad and wrongly restrained managerial personnel with a view to pressurize them to yield on the demand of the workman. The workman directly or indirectly abetted or attempted to commit the said acts of misconduct . Enquiry officer found the work- man was indirectly associated with the entire incident dated 25-5-98 and found him guilty. The disciplinary authority after giving opportunity to the workman and following the procedure involved , found the work- man associated with the incident dated 25-5-98 and after considering the entire material on record , re- moved him from service .

4. The management company always tries to maintain good relations with the union so that pro- duction is not hampered and also maintains strict discipline for purpose of administration and growth of the company. Acquittal of the petitioner in the criminal case has no bearing in the departmental action . That the punishment of removal is apt and just. That any permissiveness of indiscipline would only create an epidemic which would jeopardise the entire organization including interest of the honest and disciplined employees . The management consi- dered retention of the workman in service would jeopardise interest of the com any. The workman lost faith of the management and relationship of master and servant seized . It is prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. For the petitioner /workman no witnesses are examined and no documents are marked . For the management , no witnesses are examined but Exs . M-1 to M-33 are marked.

6. Heard both sides .

7. The point that arises for consideration is :

"Whether the removal of workman under Ex. M-33 dated 27-10-2000 is liable to be set aside and the petitioner is entitled for reinstate- ment with contianity of service and back wages ?

8. Before dealing with the point , it is necessary to see whether the workman was given opportunity in the domestic enquiry and natural justice was done . As seen, before appointing regular enquiry officer , the workman was required to submit his explanation . There was a presenting officer for the management and workman was given opportunity to take assis- tance of a co- workman in the domestic enquiry . Accordingly, one Ramesh and one K Eswara Rao assisted the workman in the domestic enquiry. The workman examined on his bhalf 3 witnesses namely (1 ) P. V. R. A. S. N. Raju , (2) G.G. Reddy and (3) B. Shankar. Thus , it is found the domestic enquiry was valid. The workman also filed a memo on 7-3-2001 not disputing validity of domestic enquiry.

9. Coming to the validity of finding of the enquiry officer and consequat conclusion of the disciplinary authority to award the highest punishment it is necessary to appreise what is the material placed before the enquiry officer . The management exa- mined 5 witnesses namely ( 1 ) Anitab Chetarji , (2) B. S.S. Srinivas , (3 ) A. Samanth , (4) B. B. Prasad, and (5) K. Satyanarayana Rao . Among hose 5 witnesses , the most competent persons are Serial Nos . 1 to 4 but they deposed in clear terms that they [भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11, 2003/ पोप 21, 1924

279 have not seen the workman at the time of the alleged incident . Basing on the said version of witnesses in Serial Nos . 1 to 4, the enquiry officer observed in his enquiry report , which is marked as Ex. M-29 .

"it is found that Sri Abraham was not present during the incident between 11.30 A.M. to 12.30 P.M." .

participation is not always essential . Common object does not require prior concert and a common meeting of mines before the attack. To substantiate this position he relied on a decision reported in AIR 2002 Supreme Court at page 1836 between Chandra Bihari Gowtam and Others- appellants and State of Bihar respondents . Considering Sections 149 and 300 of IPC in a criminal appeal, His Lordship oserved,

But the enquiry officer observed,

"the workman was definitely associated in- directly in creation of this disturbance ."

" an unlawful object can develop after the accused assembled . Existence of the common object of unlawful assembly has to be ascertained in the facts and circumstances of each case ." The above observation was so made basing on the evidence of MW-4 and MW-5 . MW -4 stated thet he went to Sector 5 STD booth at 4.00 P.M. for appraising the latest development to the AGM (P& A) . There he found the workman along with Sri M. Trinath and others . Again MW-4 found the workman along with others outside the police station in the evening . Admittedly, MW-4 did not see the workman at the place or incident but MW -4 says that the workman himself stated that he was present between 11.30 A.M. to 12.30 noon .

In my opinion, this decision has no application to the facts of the case . In the case on hand , there is no evidence that the workman was present at the time of the incident . There is also no evidence that the workman had any conspiracy with the other assailants . Therefore , firstly there is no evidence of participation of the workman and secondly there is no evidence that there was any common object on the part of the workman . Therefore, the argument advanced by learned counsel for management does not apply to the circumstances of this case .

10. MW- 5 is the Sub Inspector of Police . Accor- ding to him all the asccused persons including the workman , confessed the guilt. It is this piece of evidence of MW- 5 that was accepted by the enquiry officer and he came to the conclusion that.

"the workman was definitely associated in- directly in creation of this disturbances ."

12. The material on record does not establish any of the charges framed against the workman . The Icarned enquiry officer and the disciplinary authority have erroneously arrived at the conclusion that the charges are proved . In the circumstances , the punishment of removal is not only disproportionate bat unwarranted . Accordingly , the order of removal is set aside and award is passed directing the manage- ment to reinstate the workman into service with back wages and continuity of service . Each party is directed to bear its own costs .

Dictated to steno transcribed by her given under my hand and seal of the court this the 31st day of October , 2002.

Itis to be appreciated that when MWs - 1 to 4 have categorically stated that the workman was not found at the place of incident , why should the workman admit before MW- 5 that he was present at the time of incident ? It is relevant to peruse Ex. M- 22 which is ' mandatory question - answer session ' : The question put by the enquiry officer is ,

Y. DHILLESWARA RAO , Presiding Officer "you were at the police station when the FIR was lodged . You told the police officer that you are present during the disturbances in the morning . What you have to state ? "

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE ITID(C) No. 54/2001 WITNESSES EXAMINED :

The answer is ,

For Workman : None For Management : None DOCUMENTS MARKED :

For Workman : NIL .

For Management :

"it is not a fact that I have informed the police officer that I was present during the distur- bances in the morning . "

Charge sheet

02-06-1998

Ex . M1

Ex. M2

Explanationto charge sheet

26-06-1998

The workman gave his explanation under what circumstances he was present at the police station . The confession alleged to have been made by the workman before MW- 5 cannot be accepted for the above reason .

Ex. M3 30-07-1998 Order of management direc- ting workman to appear before E.O.

11. Learned counsel for management submitted, physical presence of the workman showing actual 3889 G1 / 2002-18 .

[PART 11 -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

Ex . M4 30-07-1998 Letter reg . Appointment of enquiry officer

Ex . M5 28-09-1998 Letter to workman by management intimating enquiry date

10-10-1998

Ex . M6

Request letter of workman reg. adjournment the case Ex . M7 15-10-1998 Letter of management reg . Intimation of adjournment date of enquiry

Ex . M8 23-10-1998 Letter of workman reg . Payment of TA & DA Ex. M9 03-11-1998 Letter of management reg . Intimation of adjournment date .

02-01-1999

Ex. M10

Letter of management reg . Intimation adjournment date

12-02-1999

Ex. MI!

Letter of management reg . intimation of adjournment date

Ex . M12 05-04-1999 Letter of management reg . intimation of adjournment date

Ex . M13

Departmental enquiry 21-04-1999

Ex. M14 27-11-1998 Enquiry deposition of Amitabh Chatterjee Ex . M15 28-01-1999 Enquiry deposition of B. S. Srinivas

E. M16 10-03-1999 Enquiry deposition A. Samanta of Ex . M17 01-03-1999 Enquiry deposition ofB. B. Prasad

Ex . M18 19-04-1999 Enquiry report of K. Satyanarayana Rao Ex . M19 20-04-1999 Enquiry deposition of P. V. R. A. S. N. Raju 20-04-1999

Ex . M20

Enquiry deposition of G. G.Reddy

21-04-1999

Ex. M21

Enquiry deposition of B. Bhaskar Rac

Ex. M22 21-04-1999 Proceedings of departmental enquiry

25-05-1998

Ex. M23

Letter to AGM by Exe- cutive P&A Reg. the inci-. dent dt. 25-05-98 .

Ex . M24

Letter to AGM / FSNL by Manager (M)

First information report Ex . M25

27-05-1998

Ex. M26

Report of B. B. Prasad , Manager (OPN )

04-05-1999

Ex . M27

Written brief of enquiry by presenting officer

11-05-1998

Ex. M28

Written brief of enquiry by defenee assistant

Enquiry report

Ex. M29

25-10-1999

Ex. M30

Letter to workman by exe- cutive (P&A)

09-11-1999

Ex. M31

Submission of representa- tion subsequent to the receipt of enquiry report by workman

Removal order

27-10-2000

Ex . M32

Removal order

27-10-2000

Ex . M33

नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.ग्रा . 140. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट श्रौद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सी.आई.डो. 74/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22025/1/ 2002-आई . आर . ( सी-II) ] एन.पो. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002 S.O. 140. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. L.C.I.D. 74/2001 ) of the Central Government Indus- trial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Governinent on 11-12-2002.

[ No. L-22025/ 1 /2002 - IR ( C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present Shri . E. ISMAIL

Presiding Office:

Dated : 31st day of October , 2002 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. L. C.I.D. 74/2001 281

भारत का राजपत्त्र: जनवरी 11,2003/पौष 21,1924

[भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Between :

Sri Chapala Venkaty ,

C/o M. V. Divakar , Plot No. 2 ,

-Petitioner II floor , Aravinda nagar, Domalguda , Hyderabad .

AND

The Chief General Manager ( Projects ) , M/ s Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , Yellandu Area, Yellandu . Khammam District .

-Respondent Appearances :

For the Petitioner : M/ s M. V. Divakar & M. Aparna , Advocates For the Respondent M/ s . J. Parthasarathy &

A. Chandrasekhaı , Advocates

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec. 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri . U. Chinnappa and M/ s. Cotton Corporation of India and two others and numbered in this Court as L. C.I.D. No. 74/2002 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. Inspite of several adjournments given from 28-11-2001 for proceedings in the case for twenty two adjournments including 31-10-2002 the petitioner has not turned - out . Inspite of number ofadjournments the petitioner has failed to pro- duce any evidence in support of his claim . There is nothing on records to support his claim. Therefore , it is ordered against the petitioner and it is held that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

Accordingly a ' Nil ' Award is passed , Transmit .

Dictated to Kum . K. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pro- nounced by me on this the 31st day of October , 2002.

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for Petitioner

the Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner.

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 12 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ . 141.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.जो. डब्ल्यू. बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बोच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या एल.सो. आई . डो. 243/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करतो है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22025/1/ 2002- ग्राई . आर . ( सी-II ) ] एन.पो. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002 S. O. 141. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. L. C.I.D 243/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as showa in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CGWB and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-2002 .

[ No. L- 22025 / 1 / 2002 - IR ( C- II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present Shri E. ISMAIL Presiding Officer

Dated : 1st October , 2002 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. L.C.I.D. 243/2001 (Old I. D. No. 24/99 transferred from Labour Court , I. Hyderabad)

Between :

Sri T. Devender Babu , H. No. 2-4-1040 , Kachiguda , Nimboli Adda ,

-Petitioner Hyderabad .

AND

The Regional Director ,. The Central Ground Water Board , Southern Region , 3-6-291 , Hyderguda ,

-Responde..

Hyderabad-29.

282 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

Appearances :

For the Petitioner M/ s A. K Jaya Prakash Rao and K. S. Rao , Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s . N. Harinath Reddy , M. Venkat Ratnam and S. Rajashekhar Rao , Advocates

AWARD

This case I. D. No. 24/99 is transferred from Labour Court - I , Hyderabad in view of the Government of India , Ministry of Labour's order No. H - 11026/ 1 /2001 - IR ( C - II ) dated 18-10-2001 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.I.d. No. 243/2001 . This is a case taken under Sec. 2A(2 ) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 , between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

2. Inspite of I.A. allowed for Petitioner's evidence , petitioner called absent and Counsel for the Petitioner reports no instructions from the Petitioner . There is nothing on record to support the case of the Petitioner . Hence , a ' Nil' Award is passed and it is held that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief .

Accordingly a ' Nil' Award is passed , Transmit .

Dictated to Kum . K. Phahi Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronou- nced by me on this the Ist day of October , 2002 .

E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for Petitioner the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ. 142.-- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इलाहाबाद बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, नवाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/79 ) को प्रकाशित करती जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/68 / 77-डो . II ( ए) ] सो. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002 S. O. 142. In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 93/79 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court , No. 2 , Dhanbad as shown in the annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Allahabad Bank and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-2002.

[No. L- 12012/68/ 77 - D II (A) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas,

Presiding Officer.

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 REFERENCE NO. 93 OF 1979 PARTIES : Employers in relation to the manage- ment of Allahabad Bank, Patna and their workman .

APPEARANCES

On behalf of the workman : None .

On behalf of the employers : None .

State : Jharkhand Industry Banking Dated , Dhanbad , the 26th November, 2002 .

ORDER

The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) (d) of the L.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 12012 / 68 / 77 - D . IIA dated , the 30th June , 1979 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Allahabad Bank in dismissing Shri G. D. Tandon from service w.e.f. 31-1-76 is justified ? If not , to what relief, the workman is entitled ? " 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor the management appeared inspite of issuance of registered notices . As such at this stage there is no scope to ascertain what is the fate of the criminal appeal which is pending before the Additional Sessions Judge . It is curious to note that the parties are not at all eager to apprise the Court about that appeal [भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11,2003/ पौष 21,1924

matter which was pending in the Court mentioned above. This case is ponding for disposal since 1979 i.e. more than 22 years . As the parties are not interested and cooperating in the matter of disposal of this reference case I do not find any reason to drag on this case in such manner . Considering all these aspects I hold that it will be better to close the case at present and to reopen the same for its final disposal if the parties appears in future .

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ . 143.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियन, 1947 (1947 का 14) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिडीकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं . 2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/81 ऑफ 2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/70/ 2000-आई . आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002 S. O. 143.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/81 of 2000) of the Contral Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , No. 2, Mumbai as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-2002 .

[No. L- 12012/ 70 /2000 - IR (B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . II , MUMBAI PRESENT :

S. N. Saundankar

Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT- 2/ 81 of 2000

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGE- MENT OF SYNDICATE BANK

Syndicate Bank , The Deputy Gen. Manager , SB, Zonal Office, Maker Tower, No.E. , 2nd Floor , Plot No. 85, Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005.

283 AND

THEIR WORKMEN Smt . Savitri N. Shenoy, 10, Hind Nivas , Society Road, Jogeshwari (E) , Mumbai-400 060 . APPEARANCES : For the Employer : For the Workmen

Mr. S. R. Kadam, Advocate. Mr. R. D. Bhat, Advocate .

Mumbai , dated 12th November, 2002 AWARD-PART II

By the Interim Award dtd. 3-1-02 this Tribunal held that the inquiry conducted against the workman. was not as per the Principles of Natural Justice and that the findings recorded by the inquiry officer are perverse. Consequently the management was direc- ted to lead evidence to justify its action , in the light of the issues framed at Serial Nos. 3 & 4 ( Exhibit 13) .

2. The facts of the case in short are as ünder : Workman Shenoy while working as Special Assis- tant at Jogeshwari Branch of Syndicate Bank com- mitted irregularity. It is pleased workman on 12-3-94 arranged/ released the lean of Rs . 13 lakhs in the name of Mr. Maradia S. J. on the security of F.C.N.R. deposit Account No. 1/94 for USD 58,104,44/- stan- ding in the name of Mr. Vinod V. Seth , USA, without obtaining duly discharged F.C.N.R. deposit receipts as security. It is contended that the sig- nature of the NRI depositor was not appearing in the L.D. ledger folio suggesting that the depositor was not present at the Branch while arranging/ releasing the loan nor any request letter from the NRI depositor to arrange /release the loan in his absence was there. It is therefore pleaded that the workman failed to discharge her duties honestly as . per the guidelines laid down and acted in a manner unbecoming of a bank employee violating bank rules and thereby committed serious irregularity, detrimental to the interest of the bank. It is con- tended for the above said allegation workman was issued chargesheet dtd. 4-4-97 and that inquiry was held in that context in which the inquiry officer held her guilty and on the basis of the inquiry report management imposed punishment of dismissal w.e.f. 10-3-99 . According to workman at the instance of then Branch Manager B. V. Pai , she acted bonafidely and further contended that the other employces working in the bank though committed grave mis- conduct were reinstated and in that light, punish- ment imposed by the management of her dismissal is harsh and disproportionate .

3. Management Bank opposed the claim of work- man contending that workınan a Special Assistant being responsible was required to take care and [PART U- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 284 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 , PAUSA 21 , 1924

caution while arranging /releasing loans to NRI but failed thereby committed misconduct for which she has been given adequate punishment of removal from service which shall not be a disqualification for future employment. It is contended considering the nature of work in the banking industry the same was not at all disproportionate . Consequently prayed to dismiss the claim of workman .

4. To prove the charge levelled against the work- man vide chargesheet dtd. 4-4-97 bank filed affidavit in lieu of Examination- in - Chief of Ex - Officer Mr. Vasudevan Shenoy ( Exhibit 56) and closed oral evidence vide purshis ( Exhibit 57) and in rebutal , workman filed affidavit in lieu of Examination- in- Chief (Exhibit 58 ) and closed oral evidence vide purshis (Exhibit 59) .

5. Management Gled written submissions ( Exhi- bit 60) and the workman at (Exhibit 61 ) . On going through the record as a whole , the written submissions and hearing the counsels , I record my findings on the remaining two issues 3 & 4 for the reasons mentioned below :

CBI had filed cases against him . He further admits that during the material period eight incidents had occured out of that in seven incidents one Ms. Kusuma Bhatt had arranged the loan however, she was reinstated. Admissions of the adversary is the best evidence . In cross -examination para 8 Mr. Shenoy candidly admits that relevant loan documents were not available at the time of investigation there- fore he cannot point out whether any error was committed by the workman. Management to prove the action mainly relies on this witness who is unable to throw light on the error if any committed by the workman . Mr. Shenoy admits that Manager has to ensure that all documents and requisite securities are taken. In view of this hardly can be said that workman committed any irregularity while arranging the loan . So far loss is concerned, Mr. Shenoy admits because of loan A/ c . 111/94 bank had not suffered any loss and that workman has nothing to do with the subsequent loan which was arranged . Therefore it is manifest that bank has not sufferred any loss and that when Manager did all the things , no fault lies with the workman . In this view of the matter, action of the management on dismissal of the workman is totally unjustified and improper .

Issues

Findings

No

3. Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank indismissing Smt . Savitri N. Shenoy is legal and proper ?

As per order below.

4. What relief the workman is entitled to ?

7. Workman has stated that since the dismissal she is not gainfully employed anywhere which has not been seriously challenged . Since the dismissal is improper and the workman was not gainfully employed management will have to be directed to reinstate her in service with full back wages . Conse- quently issues are answered accordingly and hence the crder :-

REASONS

ORDER

The action of the management of Syndicate Bank in dismissing Smt. Savitri N. Shenoy is neither justi- fied nor proper. Management Bank is directed to reinstate the workman in service with full back wages and continuity in service.

S. 'N. SAUNDANKAR , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ . 144.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंव के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदिट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 164/99) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/217/ 98-आई . आर ( बी-II ) ] सो. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 6. As stated above since domestic inquiry con- ductedby the management Bank held vitiated , relying on the decision in Neeta Kapilish Vs. Presiding Officer Labour Court, management to prove its action of dismissal of workman from the service led evidence of its Ex - Officer Mr. V. Shenoy who disclosed that workinan as Special Assistant was supervising arranging and releasing loans while working in Jogeshwari Branch and added that she failed to follow the guidelines laid down pertaining to arrangements of LD A/c 113/94 dtd. 12-3-94 while supervising the loan referred to above and that she did not point out knowing genuine signature of the depositor on the LD forms and thereby facili- tated arranging of fradulent loans for deposit of huge amounts which did not belong to the borrower of this loan and that was a serious irregularity and under the banking regulation the punishment of dismissal is very much adequate and proportionate. Mr. Shenoy admits that Mr. B. V. Pai was Branch Manager during the material period and on investi- gation it was transpired that Mr. Pai had sanctioned The lean to which he was responsible and therefore [भाग II-- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

285

भारत का राजपत: जनवरी 11,2003 पौष 21,1924

New Delhi , the 12th December , 2002 S.O. 144. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 164/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 2 , Dhanbad as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-12-02.

[ No. L- 12012 / 217/ 98 - IR ( B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas .

Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Aet. , 1947.

REFERENCE NO . 164 OF 1999

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the manage- ment of Bank of India , Ranchi Region and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

Shri G.C. Sinha , authorised representative .

Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate

On behalf of the workman On behalf of the employers

Industry : Banking

State : Jharkhand

Dhanbad , Dated , the 26th November , 2002

AWARD

The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour , in exer- cise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the fol- lowing dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12012/217/98 / IR ( B - II ) dated , the 23rd March , 1999 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the union to regularise Sh . Bala Krishna Sharma Sepoy by the manage- ment of Bank of India is justified & Proper ? If yes , what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2. In this reference both the parties appeared but did not file their respective W.S. Subsequently when the case was fixed the representative of the workman submitted before me to pass a ' No dispute' Award in this reference as the concerned workman involved in this dispute has already been expired. Learned Advocate for the management raised no objection if the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of ' No dispute' Award . Under circumstances , a ' No dispute' Award is rendered and the reference , is disposed of on the basis of ' No dispute ' Award presuming non-existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ . 145:-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक ग्रधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 65/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-12012/142/ 2001 -ग्राई . आर.(बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th December , 2002 S.O. 145. In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 65/2001 ) of the Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-12-02 .

[No. L- 12012/ 142/2001 - IR ( B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR ' COURT " SHRAM SADAN "

III Main , III Cross , II Phase , Tumkur Road , Yeshwanthpur , Bangalore

Dated : 27th November , 2002 PRESENT

HON'BLE SHRI V.N. KULKARNI , B.Com.LLB Presiding Officer

CGIT- CUM - LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE 256

[PART 11 -SEC . 2 ( ii ) !

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

C.R. No. 65/2001

II PARTY

I PARTY

K. S. Sobitha

Wio Shri R.S. Sadanand ,

No. 703 , Ist E Cross 3rd Stage, 4th Block , Near Water Tank ,

the Management M / s . Syndicate Bank . Representedby its General Manager ( P) , Head Office . Manipal,

Basaveshwaranagar ,

KARNATAKA STATE BANGALORE - 560 079

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by cluase (d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order F.No. L- 12012/ 142/2001 - IR( B - II ) dated 11th September 2001 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Applicajon under Section 10 of the ID Act for reference of the Industrial Disputeto CGIT- Cum - LC , Bangalore-Misc Order No. 21/1999 dated 4-6-2001 Mise. Order No. 1/2001 dated 4-6-2001 and Misc. Order No. 2:2001 dated 4-6-2001 .

ORDER

in view of the fact that the Govt . of India Ministry of Labour has referred this dispute , which is registeredas CR No. 58/2002, this application under Sub section 4A of Section 10 of the ID Act has filed by the workman directly before this Tribunal is closed.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signedby me on 27th November , 2002) .

V.N. KULKARNI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर , 2002 का.ग्रा . 146.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 1.4) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय मरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रवन्धतत्त्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केबीच अनुबन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रोद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदमं संबध 729/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [मं.एस.-12012/178/ 99-आई. अ.र. ( बी.-II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th December , 2002 S.O. 146. in Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 729:2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-12-02 .

[No. L- 12012/178 / 99- IR (B - II )] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy . ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI Monday the 18th November, 2002 Present : K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ΝΟ . 729/2001 (Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court CGID No. 379/99)

In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - sectionn 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Workman Sri S. Dhasaiya and the management of Canara Bank ) . BETWEEN

Sri S. Dhasaiya

I Party/ Workman AND

II Party/ Management The General Manager , Canara Bank , H.O.I.R. Section , Bangalore APPEARANCE : For the Claimant

For the Management

M/ s . R. Amizhdhu & S. Parimala Advocates Sri T. R. Sathiya Mohan , Advocate

The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour in exer- cise of powers conferred by dclause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , have referred the concerned industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L- 12012 / 178/ 99 / IR ( B - II ) dated 11-11-1999 .

This reference has been made earlier to the Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai , where the same was taken on file as CGID No. 379/99 . When the matter was pending enquiry in that Principal Labour Court , the Government of India , Ministry ofLabour was pleased to order transfer of this case also from the file of Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court to this Tribunal for adjudication . On receipt of records from that Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court, this case has been taken on file as I.D. No. 729/2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on either side , informing them about the transfer of this case to this Tribunal, with a direction to appear before this Tribunal on 19-10-2001 and to prosecute this case further . Accordingly, the learned counsel on either side along with their respective parties have appeared and prosecuted this case further .

[भाग 11 - खंड 3 ( ii) ]

287

भारत का राजपत्त्र: जनवरी 11 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

When the matter was taken up for enquiry finally , no one has been examined on either side as a witness . No document has been marked as an exhibit on either side. In spite of the case has been adjourned to very many hearings , neither parties to this dispute has come forward to prose- cute this case . Hence , orders were reserved to decide this industrial dispute on merits with the available materials on record.

Upon perusing the Claim Statement, Counter Statement , the other material papers on record , this matter having stood over till this date for consi- deration , this Tribunal has passed , on merits , the following-

AWARD The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above order of reference by the Central Govt. for adjudication by this Tribunal is as follows

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank , Chennai in terminating the services of the workman Sri S. Dhasaiya w.e.f. 30-11-96 is justified ? If not, to what relief , he is entitled to ?"

2. The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the I Party/Workman Sri S. Dhasaiya (here- inafter refers to as Petitioner) are briefly follows : as

from 11-3-96 to 25-03-96. But the Bank refused to grant the leave on medical grounds . Even without informing the Petitioner the bank counted the leave as leave on loss of pay . Because of his family situation and continuing ill health he has to shift the place of residence and the same was duly intimated to the office by letter dated 27-07- 96. Since the Petitioner had a service of 14 years he was eligible for 39 days of privilege leave as well as 45 days of sick leave on half pay basis as on 22-11-95 . During his leave period , he was transferred to Sirumugai branch and the Petitioner had joined duty as per the order of the manage- ment and then because of his health condition he continued the medical leave . On 18-1-97 the Petitioner went to Circle Office at Madurai to report for duty . But at that time only, he came to know that he was terminated from service on the ground that he voulntarily retired/aban- doned from service w.e.f. 30-11-96 . Strangely with out adhering to any of the rules and regulations the management hastily terminated the Petitioner from service without giving any notice as con- templated under the rules and Bipartite Settle- ment. The proceedings dated 4-12-96 of the General Manager was not communicated to the Petitioner at all but only a xerox copy was handed over to the Petitioner while he approached the Circle Office to rejoint duty with alf necessary documents of medical certificates and fitness certificate . The impunged order of terminating the Petitioner was passed behind his back without giving any opportunity for him to controvert the same. The management without any reason construed that the Petitioner was unauthorieedly absent even though the Petitioner diligently sent the leave letter as well as the change of address to the management concerned on 23-7-96 . The attitude of terminating the services of the Peti- tioner without giving hím an opportunity or notice is against the principles of natural justice and which is violative of the Industrial Disputes Act. Without having any other remedy alternative immediately, he gave a representation to the General Manager , Head Office , Canara Bank , Bangalore through the Deputy General Manager , Canara Bank, East Veli Street, Staff Section , Circle Office , Madurai explaining the situation but that did not yield any result , but a reply was sent that there was no provision to consider the request of the Petitioner . Once again the Peti- tioner sent an appeal to the Executive Director on 9-4-97 and the same was replied on 30-04-97 that there was no provision for appeal against the order impungned . The Petitioner filed a conciliation petition before the Regional Labour Commissioner , Central , Chennai and the same was referred to Assistant Labour Commissioner , C- II The Petitioner was selected by the Banking Service Recruitment Board, Madras in 1982 for the post of Clerk- cum- Cashier and he was allotted to the Canara Bank. Initially the Petitioner was appointed at Nerkundram , Madras Branch by the Canara Bank Circle Office at Madras . He joined duty on 18-8-82 . The Petitioner was transfered to Gandhipuram , Coimbatore Branch during May , 1985. Till 1991 he worked at Gandhi- puram, Branch , Coimbatore and afterwards he was transferred to Sarkar Samakulam Rural Branch in Coimbatore Regional Office . He worked in all the branches sincerely and heonstly and dis- charged his duties to the utmost satisfaction of the superiors . He has got a unblemished record and during his tenure he did not face any enquiry not even he received any memo from the manage- ment . He was regular to work aitd has got a good record in doing works entrusted to him. During 20-11-95 because of some ill health he was forced to take leave on medical grounds . Even though , he had intimated about his illness to the officer concerned , due to some reason or other the management forced the Petitioner to give a letter treating the leave as leave on loss of pay . Actually the Petitioner had given medical leave for the period from 20-11-95 to 8-3-96 and once again 3889 GI/ 2002-19 .

[PART I - SEC . 3 ( i ) ] 288 THE GAZUTIE OF INDIA JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

Chennai . On failure of conciliation , this indus- trial dispute has been raised by the Petitioner for adjudication by this Tribunal , which has been duly referred by the Central Govt . by reference . The Petitioner has not reccived any single com- munication from the management and the addresses to which the managment is said to have issued the communication are not at all concerned with this Petitioner . On 23-7-96 the Petitioner had already sent a communication to the manage ment about his change of address . The management did not take care to record the same , had committed an error in sending the communication to the addresses which are not at all connected to the Petitioner . On the basis of the letters which are purported to have been sent to the last kne wn address cannot be construed as a valid service and the management has not service as per the procedure . The management has not followed the rules of serving the com- munication to the Petitioner . On the basis of these proceedings , the management cannot main- tain the order of termination against the Petitioner . The order of the termination was signed by an officer, who is not competent to pass an erder of only the order was signed termination . Net by an incompetent person but also the same was net served to the Petitioner in accordance with rules and practice and agreement. The Petitioner is entitled to subsequent benefits given to the workers of the management and in fact, he appeared for the promotional test and com- pleted the same successfully for the three conse- cutive years , but because of the careless attitude of the management, he was n't called for inter- view for the promotional post in spite of his securing highest marks in the test . Since the termination is illegal , which is passed behind his back and without following the natural justice it has to be set aside and the Petitioner is entitled to he reinstated with all back wages and other service benests . Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased tu pass an order diresting the Respondent/Management to reinstate the Petitioner in service with all back wages and other attendant service benefits . completed the

3. The averments in the Counter Statement filed by the II Party/ Management Canara Bank (hereinafter referds to as Respondent ) are briefly as follows :

pay by their letter dated 28-3-96 in was in the Sirumugai branch , had absented himself from duty from 20-11-95 without intimation and only on 19-3-96 he had applied for leave by his letter dated 9-3-96 requesting leave on loss of pay from 20-11-95 to 8-3-96. The reason for requesting for such leave was given by him as due to some personal problems in his family. Again by a letter dated 11-3-96 , the Petitioner requested the bank to grant him privilege leave from 11-3-96 to 25-3-96 the reason being de- pression . According to the existing leave rules of the bank, an employee who is desirous of availing privilege leave , shall inform the bank. one month prior to the date of his actual avail- ing of privilege leave . Therefore, the bank treated the periods covered under the above two letters as absence without leave and hence on loss of accordance with the proceedings of the General Manager dated 21-3-96 . The said letters were addressed to Sirumugai branch , where the Petitioner working at that time. The Petitioner had sent his leave letters for his period of absentce from 26-3-96 to 31-7-96 on medical grounds . However , the same was not supported by any medical certificate and hence , the said period of 124 days from 26-3-96 to 31-7-96 was treated as absence without leave and on loss of pay vide proceedings of the Respondent dated 5-8-96 and communicated to the Sirumugai Branch where the Petitioner was working at that time by a letter dated 7-8-96 . Subsequent to the said period namely after 31-7-96 , there was absolutely no intimation whatsoerve , including any leave application from the Petitioner nor did he report for duty . Since the Petitioner had been continuously absenting himself from. duty from 20-11-95 onwards , without due authori- sation , the bank issued a letter by Registered Post to the Petitioner at the address which was recorded in the service records , instructing the Petitioner to join duty on or before 11-5-96. The said letto: was returned with an endorsement as ' left' . The bank by a letter dated 31-5-96 sent by RPAD addressed to Sri S. Dhasaiyan , Clerk, Canara Bank, No. 4, Seethammal Street , Vadapalani , Madras - 76 instructed the Petitioner to join duty on or before 12-6-96. The same was returned with the endorsement as intimation on 6-6-95 . Again the bank by a letter dated 6-7-96 sent by RPAD addressed to the Mettu- palayam address instructed the Petitioner to join duty on or before 17-7-96 failing which appro- priate disciplinary action would be taken against him. The same returned with endorsement as 'left' . Thereafter , the Respondent /Bank by their letters instructed the Petitioner to report back for duty one dated 5-9-96 sent by RPAD which was returned unserved as ' party left ' and the The Petitioner joined the Respondent/Bank on 18-08-82 at their Nerkandram branch as pro- bationary clerk . the was confirmed in the services of the bank w.ef. 18-2-83 . His performance of duties has not been from belmish and has been quite u satisfactory . The Petitioner while werking 289

भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पौष 21 , 1924

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

said termination, the Petitioner raised the abov industrial dispute . There were various instances of cautioning /warning the Potitioner for misconducts and also for dishonour of cheques . Further the Peti- tioner was chargeshected on 10-9-96 for committing of a serious misconduct under Canara Bank Service Code by misappropriating the jewel given by the customer and issuing a fictitious gold loan ticket. The disciplinary action could not be proceeded with consequent to his voluntary cossation/ 2bandonment of service . The Petitioner was not absolved of the charges contained in the said charge sheet issued to him and the same is still pending enquiry . A plain reading of the Petitioner's letter dated 9-3-96 to Respondent/Bank would clearly show that only to suit his convenience . the Pitioner has put forward the said allegation and due to the same reasons the management forced him to give a letter to that offect Having balance of leave at his eredit will not confer any right upon the Petitioner to avail leave unles duly applied for in accordance with the existing leave rules and the same is sanctioned by the appropriate authority . La this case , the Positioner has n either duly applied for privilege leave and sick have on half pay nor the same was sanctioned by the competent authority. The Petitioner had remained absent for a long time and was not reporting for duty in spite of repeated reminders . The repeated absence of employee will adversely affbet the smooth functioning of the bank . Hence , the Positioner was terminated as having voluntarily retired/abandoned from the service , as he has failed to report for duty despite enough opportunity given to him . Apparently , th Petitioner has deliberatly evaded service of the communication sent to him by the bank and in a desperate attempt to cover up his such acts only , he now claims as if his address has been changed and he has intimated the said change by a letter dated 27-3-96 and the sam is specifically denied by Respondent as the said statement is nothing but a blatant lie . Sufficient opportunity was provided to the Petitioner to join duty or show cause for not reporting for duty in accordance with the provisions of Bipartite Settlement and other relevant rules and regulations . The Respondent/Bank strictly and scrupulously followed the Bipartite Settlement / Canara Bank Service Code for the purpose of service of notice on the Petitioner . Thus , the order of termi- nation is fully justified and legal . The order dated 4-12-96 was issued by the Competent Authority to communicate such orders as per the practice in vogue in the bank. In the event of this . Hon'ble Court holding that sufficient opportunity has not been pro- vided to the Petitioner prior to the order of termi- nation, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to provide an opportunity to the Respondent/ Bank to substantiate their case before this Hon'ble anothe : letter dated 11-10-96 sent by RPAD addre- ssed to Mettupalayam and Chennai addresses and the same was also displayed at the Sirumugai branch . The cover addressed to Chennai returned with endorsement ' party out of station ' and the cover addressed to Mettupalayam returned with endorsement ' intimated ' 16-10-96. The petitioner failed to report for duty in spite of specific ins- tructions from the bank . The above mentioned address to which the letters referred to above were sent , were given by the Petitioner himself at the time of his joining duty . The said addres- ses are the only addresses that are found in the service records of the Petitioner and no other address has been provided by the Petitioner for the purpose of issuance of correspondence from the bank . In these circumstances , in the absence of any change of address given by the Petitioner, the question of issuing the correspondence/ communication by the bank to any other address does not at all arise . Thereafter , a notice under clause 7 of the V Bipartite Settlement dated 31-10-96 addressed to Chennai and Mettupalayam addresses of the Petitioner was issued by RPAD , whereby the Petitioner was instructed to report for duty within 30 days from the date of notice failing which it will be presumed that he dees not have any intention of rejoining duties and that he will be deemed to be voluntarily retired from the services of the bank on expiry of the said period . The same was also displayed at Sirumugai branch office notice board . The letter addressed to Mettupalayam got returned with endorsement as ' intimated on 4-11-96 ' and again intimated on 5-11-96. Another copy of the same notice addressed to Chennai address also got returned as ' left ' . Since the Petitioner failed to report for duty as instructed, the Respondent/ Bank in terms of clause 17 of Bipartite Settlement vide proceedings of the General Manager dated 4-12-96 terminated the services of the Petitioner on the ground that he voluntarily retired/ aban- doned the services of the bank w.e.f. 30-11-96 and that the period of absence from 28-7-96 to 30-11-96 be treated as absence without leave and hence , on loss of pay. The above proceedings was communicated to the petitioner by RPAD and by a certificate of posting to his last known address at Chennai and Mettupalayam and a copy of the same was duly displayed at the Sirumugai branch , where the Petitioner was lastly working . The said RPAD cover sent to Chennai address got returned with postal authorities remarks 'No such name in this address ' and the RPAD cover sent to Mettu- palayam address returned with postal authorities remarks on 5-12-96 intimated and 6-12-96 again intimated. It is only on being aggrieved against the 290

[ PART I - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

Court. Hence, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the claim of the Potitioner in this industrial dispute as there are no marit .

4. The Pointfor my consideration is :

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank , Chennai in terminating the services of the workman Sri S. Dhasaiya w.c.f. 30-11-96 is justified ? If not , to what relief, he is entitled ? "

Point:

a request for leave on loss of pay. In that letter he has stated that due to his personal problems in his family, he has not attended the office from 20-11-95 to 8-3-96 and hence he requested for sanction of leave for those days on loss of pay . Sending of one such letter by the Petitioner has been burked by the Petitioner in his Claim Statement . That the Peti- tioner would allege in his Claim Statement that due to some reason or other , the Respondent/Manage- ment forced him to give a letter treating the leave as leave on loss of pay, though he had given medical leave for the period 25-11-95 to 8-3-96. In support of his contention that he has been forced to give one such, letter , there is no acceptable supportive oral or documentary evidence in this case .It is his admission that he has been absent for duty from 11-3-96 to 25-3-96 and the bank refused to grant him leave on medical grounds and without infor- ming him , the bank counted the leave as leave on loss of pay. It is not his contention that he has submitted leave applications for those two periods of his absence for duty mentioning that he requires medical leave and for which he had also submitted medical certificates in proof therefore . On the other hand , the Respondent/Management has filed the xerox copy of the letter dated 11-3-96 given by the Petitioner to the Respondent/ Management . In that document, the Petitioner has stated that due to depression , he was not able to work in the bank and hence , he requested for sanction of leave for 15 days from 11-3-96 to 25-3-96 . Both these letters sent by the Petitioner from Sirumugai branch to the Respon- dent/Management belie the version of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement that he had applied for medical leave for both two periods of his absence for duty. On the other hand , the version of the Respondent /Management in their Counter State- ment are consistent to these two documents . Further as mentioned in the Counter Statement , the procee- dings of the General Manager dated 21-3-96 for the absence of the Petitioner for duty was taken on 21-3-96 and the period of the absence of the Peti- tioner for duty had been treated as unauthorised absence and it was treated absence without leave and hence on loss of pay and the xerox copy of that proceedings has also been filed as a document on the side of the Respondent /Bank. Then on the leave application dated 9-3-96 of the Petitioner , the proceedings was drawn by the General Manager of the Respondent /Bank Circle Office , Madurai on 28-3-96, wherein it was said that his period of absence has been treated as absence without leave and hence on loss of pay. The xerox copy of that proceedings dated 28-3-96 also has been filed by the Respondent/ Management into Court . It is also contended that these proceedings have been sent to the Petitioner at This industrial dispute has been raised by the 1 Party/Workman the Petitioner Sri S. Dhasaiya challenging the action of the II Party/Management Canara Bank, Chennai in terminating the services of the Petitioner w.o.f. 30-11-96 as unjustified. It is admitted that the Petitioner has joined the Respon- dent Bank on 18-8-82 at the Nerkundram branch as probationary clerk and his services was confirmed w.e.f. 18-2-83 . It is also admitted that when the Petitioner was working in Sirumugai branch of the Respondent /Bank absented for duty from 20-11-1995 . It is the contention of the Respondent/Management that he was absent for duty without any intimation and only on 9-3-96 the Petitioner had applied for leave by his letter dated 9-3-96 requesting leave on loss of pay from 20-11-95 to 8-3-96 giving the reasons for such leave as due to some personal problems in his family and that again by a letter dated 11-3-96, the Petitioner requested the bank to grant him pri- vilege leave from 11-3-96 to 25-3-96, due to depres- sion and that the bank treated the said periods covered under those two letters as absence without leave and on loss of pay and the proceedings of the General Manager dated 21-3-96 to that effect was informed through a letter dated 28-3-96to the Peti- tioner to Sirumugai branch, where he was working at that time . But , it is the contention of the Peti- tioner in his Claim Statement that during 20-11-95 because of some ill health, he was forced to take leave on medical ground and even though he inti- mated about his illness to the officer concerned due to some reason or other , the Respondent/Manage- ment forced the Petitioner to give a letter treating the leave as leave on loss of pay and that though the Petitioner had given medical leave for the period from 20-11-95 to 8-3-96 and from 11-3-96 to 25-3-96 , the bank refused to grant the leave on medical grounds and even without informing the Petitioner, the bank counted the leave as leave on loss of pay . On the side of the Respondent /Management Xerox copies of thedocuments have been filed , after furni- shing , the copies of the same to the Petitioner. The first document is a xerox copy of the letter dated 9-3-96 sent by the Petitioner to the Deputy General Manager Circle Office , Madurai , through the Senior Manager , Canara Bank, Sirumugai stating that it is [भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11,2003 /पौष 21,1924

his Sirumugai bank branch address . These aver- ments of the Respondent /Management in the Counter Statement have not been denied . It is the further contention of the Petitioner that because of his family situation and continued ill health , he had shifted his place of residence , and has intimated the same to the office by his letter dated 23-7-96 . Не would further contended in his Claim Statement that since he has been transferred during the leave period to Sirumugai branch , he had joined duty as per the order of the Respondent / Management and then because of his ill health he continued the medical leave . He had not stated as to when he joined duty in Sirumugai branch and from what date he conti- nued to be on medical leave and upto what period . But in the Counter Statement the Respondent has stated that the Petitioner has sent his leave letters for his period of absence from 26-3-96 to 31-7-96 on medical grounds and that the same was not supported by any medical certificate and hence, the said period of 124 days from 26-3-96 to 31-7-96 was treated as absence without leave and on loss of pay vide proceedings of the General Manager , Personnel Wing , Head Office dated 5-8-96 and the same was communicated to the Petitioner who was working at Sirumugai branch at that time by a letter dated 7-8-96 . In support of this contention, the Xerox copies of the proceedings of the General Manager , Madurai dated 5-8-96 and the Xerox copy of the letter dated 7-8-96 also had been filed by the Respondent /Bank . The Respondent /Management has also filed a xerox copies of the returned postal covers with the postal endorsement as ' left ' . All those postal covers had been sent to the address given by the Petitioner to the bank. Some with postal endorsement as ' party out of station ' and 'not claimed . All these documents filed on the side of the Respondent /Bank show that the Peti- tioner remained absent for duty unauthorisedly and his period of absence for duty has been treated as leave on loss of pay , since the leave applications he has sent requesting leave on medical grounds have not been supported with medical certificates , for which the concerned authorities had drawn proce- edings and the same had been duly intimated to the Petitioner then and there to his given address . But , they have not been served on the Petitioner in his given address due to his non - availability and as well as his instruction to postal authorities as ' not claimed' . That Respondent has clearly averred in the Counter Statement that subsequent to 31-7-96 also there was absolutely no intimation whatsoever from the Peti- tioner for his absence for duty and since the Peti- tioner had been continuously absenting himself from duty from 20-11-95 onwards without due authori- sation , the bank issued a letter by registered post to

291 the Petitioner's to his given address and instructed him to join for duty on or before 11-5-96. But the said letter was returned unserved with the postal endorsement as ' left' and that by another letter dated 31-5-96 the Respondent /Bank instructed the Petitioner to join duty on or before 12-6-96 . The said letter sent by registered post was also reuturned unserved . Again the bank sent another letter dated 6-7-96 by registered post to his Mettupalayam address and Instructed him to join duty on or before 17-7-96 and that was also returned unserved with the postal endorsement as ' left ' In support of these conten- tions the Xerox copies of those letters of instruction and the returned postal covers with the postal.en- dorsements have been filed by Respondent/Manage- ment . It is also the contention of the Respondent/ Management that a notice under section Clause 17 of 5th Bipartite Settlement dated 31-10-96 was sent to the Petitioner to both his Chennai as well at Mettupalayam addresses by RPAD , whereby the Petitioner was instructed to report for duty within thirty days from the date of notice , failing which it will be presumed that he does not have any inten- tion of rejoining for duty and that he will be deemed to be voluntarily retired from the services of the bank on the expiry of the said period and a similar notice has been displayed at Sirumugai branch office notice board . It is their further averment that the letter addressed to Mettupalayam returned unserved with postal endorsement ' as intimated on 4-11-96 and again intimated on 5-11-96 ' and that the another copy of the same notice addressed to Chennai address returned unserved with the postal endorsement as ' left' So, the Respondent / Bank Management having found that the Petitioner failed to report for duty took proceedings as per clause 17 of 5th Bipartit Settlement and the General Manager by an order dated 4-12-96 terminated the services of the Peti- tioner on the ground that he voluntarily retired / abandoned the services of the bank w.e.f. 30-11-96 . On the other hand , the Petitioner has contended in his Claim Statement that on 18-1-97 when he went to Circle Office at Madurai to report for duty he came to know that he was terminated from service on the ground that he voluntarily retired/ abandoned from service w.e.f. 30-11-96 . It is his contention that without adhering to any of the rules and regu- lations , the Respondent/Management hastily termi- nated the Petitioner from service , without giving him any opportunity to controvert the same and the said action of the Respondent /Management is against the principles of natural Justice and that he has not received any single communication from the Respon- dent /Management and the addresses to which the Respondent /Management said to have issued com- munications are not all concerned with the Petitioner and the termination order was signed by an Officer , [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

5. In the result , an Award is passed holding that the concerned workman Sri S. Dhasaiya is not en titled for any relief. No Cost .

(Dictated to the Stenographer , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 18th November , 2002) .

K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer

None

Witnesses Examined : On either side

Nil

Documents Exhibited : On either side

नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ . 147.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कॉरपोरेशन बैंक के प्रबन्धतत्व के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुवन्ध में निर्दिष्ट ग्रौद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/90 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं.एल. - 12012/ 211/ 90-आई. आर . (बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th December , 2002

S.O.147; In pursuance of Section 17 of the Irndustrial Dispute Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/90 ) of the Central Government Indus- trial Tribunal- cam - Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Corporation Bank and their workman , which was received by the Cintral Government on 12-12-02 .

[No. L - 12012/211 / 90 - IR (B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IN- DUSTRIAL, TRIBUNAL, CUM LABOUR COURT " SHRAM SADAN "

III MAIN , III CROSS , II PHASE , TUMKUR ROAD , YESHWANTHPUR , BANGALORE. Dated : 29th November , 2002 PRESENT

Hon'ble Shri V.N. Kulkarni , B.Com . L.L.B. Presiding Officer CGIT- Cum - Labour Court, Bangalore C.R. No. 58/90

who is not competent to pass an order of termi- nation . All these contentions of the Petitioner are shown to be incorrectby the Xerox copies of the documents filed on the side of the Respondent/ Management in this case . From those documents , it is evidently clear that the Respondent/Management has taken all diligent steps to inform the Petitioner with a direction to report for duty within the specified period and only the Petitioner have turned a deaf ear to all the directions of the Respondent/Manage- ment to report for duty in time . The endorsements made by postal authorities on the retarned postal covers go to show that the Petitioner was duly infor- med about those postal articles sent by the Respon- dent /Management and for the reasons best known to him, they were returned by the Petitioner himself. So, all these things belie the contention of the Peti- tioner that he was not given notice as contemplated under Bipartite Settlement before termination . As contended by the Respondent /Management the repeated absence of the employee adversely affected the smooth functioning of the bank. From the available materials, it is seen that the Petitioner had voluntarily abandoned the service and failed to report for duty despite enough opportunity was given to him . From the available records , it is seen that the Petitioner has deliberately evaded the service of the communication sent to him by the bank and only to cover of his mistake , he now claims as if his addres has been changed and his intimated the change of address by his letter dated 27-3-96 . Even to prove that fact, the Petitioner has not chosen to let in any acceptable evidence . So , as it is contended by the Respondent /Management , it is only a defence that has been though of by the Petitioner now, to wriggle out from the situation . For his contention , the Petitioner has not proved with acceptable evidence that the order has been passed by an officer other than the competent authority. Nothing has been mentioned in the Claim Statement as on what ground he says that the officer passed the order of termination is not the competent authority and who is the person as a competent authority to pass one such order , when especially, the Respondent has asserts their stand that the said order dated 4-12-96 has been issued by the competent authority. Further , it is represented that the Petitioner is now a practicing lawyer enrolled himself as an advocate in the year 1997 and is gainfuily employed at present . This has not been denied by the Petitioner . Under such circumstances , on the basis of the materials available in this case , it can be easily concluded that the action of the management Canara Bank , Chennai in termi- nating the services of Sri S. Dhasaiya w.e.f. 30-11-1996 is justified . Hence , the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief. Thus , the point is answered accordingly.

[भाग II-- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

II Party

I Party

Shri B. Umesh Rao , C/ o . Shri Shambu

Namboodiri

The Chairman , Corporation Bank , Head Office, Mangalore-575001 Advocate ,

Sullia-574 239

D. K. District .

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/ - 211 /90/ IR - B ( II ) dated 16th October, 1990 for adjudi- cation on the following schedule;

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Corporation Bank interminating the services of Shri B. Umesh Rao , Janata Deposit Collector w.e.f. 28-4-1988 is justified ? If not to what relief the said workman is entitled to " ?

2. The first party was working with the manage- ment as janata DepositCo llector and his services were terminated therefore , Industrial Dispute is raised.

3. Parties appeared and filed Claim Statement and Counter respectively .

4. It is the case of the first party workman that he was appointed as Janata Deposit Collcetor by an order dated 27-11-1972 . He was discharging his duties faithfully and honestly . He executed an argee- ment after he was appointed as Janata Deposit Collector . The Higher Officers have also given him appreciation. letter. He was getting an average commission of Rs . 3300/- monthly income as his salary. He worked for 15 years continuously . The Incharge Manager adopted unfair labour practice and issued show cause notice . He also rejected the request of the workman to accept currency notes collected from Janatha Deposit holders . There was no charge sheet against him . No enquiry was con- ducted against him and therefore , the termination is illegal . Workman for these reasons and for some ther reasons has prayed to pass award in his favour .

5. As against this the case of the management is as under :--

6. The main contention of the management is that the first party is not a Workman at all . He is

293

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11,2003 पौष 21,1924

not an employ of the Bank . He is only an agent of Collection of Janatha Deposit on commission basis and he was paid certain percentage . He was not the member of staff .

7. It is the further case of the management that he was not subject to the normal working hours of the bank . He was not paid any salary or wages . There was no age restriction for appointment of Janata Deposit Collectors . All the allegations made by the workman are not correct . The dispute itself is not maintainable . He was not getting monthly commission of Rs . 3300 as his salary . The question of issue of charge sheet does not arise and there is no need of conducting enquiry because he is not an employee of the bank . He was terminated as per the agreement . He has not put in continuous service of 15 years . He was not depositing the connected money in time. Management for these reasons and for some other reasons has prayed to reject the reference .

8. On behalf of the management MW1 is exa- mined . His evidence is that he was working at Sullia Branch from 1987 to 1990. Workman was the Janatha Deposity Collector . His duties were to collect amount from the depositors and deposit the amount on the next day. Notice was issued to him as per Ex.M3 . Regional Manager made enquiries and he has given detailed Report . MW1 states in his cross examination that the Regional Manager conducted enquiry against him . He also admits that in the earlier part the Regional Manager have given appreciation lettor . When Ex. M3 was given he was in charge Manager. It is also in the cross examination of MWI that the workman has given reply at Ex. W2 saying that he has not committed any misconduwt . He admits in his cross examination that no regular enquiry " was conducted by issuing charge sheet. He admits that Ex.M4 is not against the first party.

9. Against this , the workman has given evidence and stated that he has not committed any mistake and he has not instigated the customers to give com- plaint against the officers of the Bank. He has given detailed evidence in support of his claim .

10. I have heard te learned counsels appeariig for the parties.

11. I have carefully perused the decision relied by the Management in AIR 1973 SC 1227. I have also read the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision reported in 2001 AIR SCW 749. In view of the judgement of the Hon'ble. Supreme Court of India referred carlier , the first party is a Workman . The contention of the management that the first party is not an employee of the bank is not correct . He is an employee of the second party management .

294

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

to 12. Once it is held that the first party is a workman , remove himfrom service mandatory provisions of ID Act have to be complica with but all that is not done . The so- called enquiry done by the manage- ment through the Regional Manager is not sufficient . No charge sheet was given to the Workman and no enquiry was conducted in his presence . Therefore , the evidence of MWI and the documents relied by the management is not sufficient to say that the en- quiry is properly conducted against the workman before he was terminated .

13. Of course when he was terminated according to the management he was not a workman at all. But now in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India the first party is a Workman and therefore the management has to hold regular enquiry by issuing notice of enquiry and charge sheet to the workman . All that is not done .

14. I have read the decision relied in AIR 1973 SC 1.227 . It is clear from he said decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India that the management independently can prove the misconduct against the workman.

15. In the instant case the evidence of MWI and the documents relied by the management are not sufficient to say that the management has provecd masconduct against the workman . The management has not examined any independent witnesses to prove that there was complaint against the workman regarding his work .

16. In view of these facts and the principles held in the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India 1 am of the opinion that this is a fit case to allow the reference . Accordingly I proceed to pass the following Order;

OREER

The reference is allowed . The Management is directed to regularize the services of the first party keeping in mind the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the decision reported in 2001 AIR SCW749.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 29th November , 2002)

V. N. KULKARNI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 दिसम्बर , 2002

का . आ . 148 - आँद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय- सरकार यूनियन बैंक श्रॉफ इडिया के प्रबन्धतत्त्र के संबद्ध नियो- जकों और उनके धार्म कारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्यो- गिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक श्रधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/88 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[स.एल.-12012/ 327/ 87-डी.-II (ए .) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव Now Delhi , the 13th December , 2002 S.O. 148. In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government horoby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/88) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Contral Government on 12-12-2002.

[No L- 12012/327/ 87 - DII (A) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT " SHRAM SADAN "

III Main , III Cross , II Phase , Tumkur Road , Yeshwanthpur , Bangalore.

Dated : 29th November 2002 PRESENT

HON'BLE SHRI V.N. KULKARNI , B Com LLB . Presiding Officer CGIT-Cum - Labour Court , Bangalore C.R. NO 15/88

I PARTY

II PARTY

The Regional Manager , Union Bank of India , Raviwar Pet ,

Shri Babu Mahadevappa Andani , H. No. 1514 , Ambiger Galli , Gokak, Dist . BELGAUM

BELGAUM ( Karnataka) AWARD

1. The Central Government by excrcising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of Sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputos Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/327 / 87- D.II (A) dated 22nd March 1988 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in di . missing from service Shri Babu Mahadevappa Andan iis justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?" [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii )

2. The first party was working with the manage- ment . He was dismissed from service and therefore, Industrial Dispute is raised .

3. Parties appeared artd filed Claim statement and Come respectively.

4. The case of the workman in brief is as follows :

5. The fist party joined the services of the then Belgaum Bank as Peon and he was working from 1967-68 to 1974 in its Gokak Branch and thereafter he was transferred to Belgaum Bank, Hebbal . Managemci gave charge sheet alleging that the workman has misappropriated the amount of the customers of the Bank with one Pigmy Agent Shri Subhash Bhimappa . Charge sheet was issued and enquiry was conducted.

6. The main contention of the workman is that confession statement was obtained by the manage- ment by threat of removal from the service and also got deposited the alleged misappropriated amount under coercion and threat and made a farce of enquiry into the alleged misappropriation against the work- man. The Enquiry Officer has also made a farce of enquiry and submitted report against the first party holding him guilty of the alleged charges leveled by the management. It is said the same is not correct . The report of the Enquiry Officer is per- verse . The management has filed false case against him to save others . The workman has not mis- appropriated any amount . The Management has not taken care before passing the payment . There are latches on the part of the official . Enquiry is very bad and not fair .

7. It is the further case of the workman that the second party bank filed a recovery suit at OS.No. 105/1981 in the court of the Principal Munsiff against the first party and others. The said suit was dis- missed. The order of dismissal is illegal. He has not committed any misconduct . The punishment based on the so called confessions and admissions is unfair and unjust . The admission of the first party is not voluntary . Workman for these reasons and for some other reasons has prayed to pass award in his favour .

8. The case of the Management in brief is as follows:

9. The main contention of the management is that the first party has committed fraud in collusion with one Shri Subhash Bhimappa Hidaduggi , who was Mini Deposit Collector Agent in the Hebbal Branch .

10. The next contention of the management is that the first party has confessed that he has com- mitted fraud and gave confession letter in writing , He has admitted that fraudulently he has withdrawn 3889 GI/2002-20.

295

भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11,2003/पौष 21,19:24

the amount and the amount was used for purchasing a car .

11. In spite of the confession statement charge- sheet was issued and Enquiry was conducted. It is said the same is fair and proper and full opportunity was given to the workman . The contention of the workman that the confession statement was given at threat is not correct . The confession letter was given voluntarily by the first party . It is said that the Civil Suit was dismissed and the bank has filed an appeal and the same is pending before Civil Judge , Chikkodi . Management for these reasons and for soiffe other reasons has prayed to reject the reference .

12. Management examined witnesses and closed the case for preliminary issue , Workman also got examined himself and closed the case . This tribunal by its order dated 13th May 1994 has held that the DE held against the first party is illegal and the DE is set aside .

13. It is seen from the records that after the DE was set aside . Management examined two witnesses , MW4 and MW5. MW4 has given evidence that he inspected in Hebbal Branch as Vigilance Officer and he was asked to investigate the irregularities . He questioned all the staff and the first party .

14. It is further disposed by him that the first party orally confessed that he has withdrawn amount of SB Account. Ex.MW12 and M13 are marked in his evidence. Ex.M14 and M15 are also investi- gated by him and marked in his evidence. According to Ex.M15 the amount was repaid by the workman . he has given report .

15. Before I proceed further I would like to say that this witness MW4 has stated that his investigation report is not filed in this case . There is no proper explanation from the management for not filing the report of MW4. That is the best piece of evidence , but it is not filed . This is fatal to the management .

16. He further said that there was no pressure on the first party to give confession statement . MW4 says in his cross examination that he has given order in writing to investigate the case . Again he says that letter is not produced . He says he cannot say the contents of that letter. He says he cannot give date. It must be 1987 .

17. He further says in his cross examination that he made only oral enquiry . He has not recorded any statement of enquiries . He says he cannot say to whom he examined . He does not know anything about Civil Suit to recover amount of this case . He says cheques are written and signed by the con- cerned persons . He does not know how many pigmy depositors in the bank. He admits in his [PART I- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 296 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

cross examination that the amount was paid vide Ex.M14 & M15. He further says that Ex . M14 & Ex.M15 were not written . Specimen signatures of the first party are not filed. He says it is very difficult to recollect things now . He cannot say whother he has read four letters . He cannot say whether the cheques were directly passed or aftor the officer signed by them . He has not examined bank officers and cashiers . On going through the evidence of MW4, I am of the opinion that his evi- dence is not clear and cogent to prove that the work- man has misappropriated any amount .

18. According to the case of the management its if the workman has misappropriated certain amount in coliusion with the Mini Deposit Collector. Further civil suit is filed against the first party and others . In other words according to the manage- ment itself the first party workman is not the only person who has committed misconduct and alleged misappropriation . Evidence of MW4 does throw any light and his evidence itself is not sufficient to prove the all god forgery as per the charge sheet . not 19. In the instant case the evidence adduced by the management is not sufficient to prove forgery and fraud. Charge sheet is very vague . Charge sheet mustbe specific but it is not shown in this case . According to the charge sheet the first party work- man in collusion with the mini deposit collecting agent perpetrated fraud in SB account of customers by forging the signatures of the account holders . Surprisingly no names of the customers on whose account the amount is withdrawn is not given . There is no evidence that exactly how much amount was withdrawn from the SB Account. Cheques have been passed after verification by the officials of the bank . In view of these facts 1 am of the opinion that the evidence of MW4 is not help directly to prove fraud and forgery and misappropriation.

20. Admittedly when the DE is set aside the management has to adduce clear and cogent evidence to prove the misappropriation .

21. MW5 is examined . He was in Hebbal Branch in the year 1978 to 1980. He says that there was investigation against first party for misappro- priation of the amount in the bank . He says that general investigation was made and all the employees were examined. He further says that first party told that he has done something and gave in writing.

22. Before I proceed further I would like Comment here that this MW5 has not stated in clear terms as to what confession the first party gave in writing. He only says that no pressure was put on the first party to give confession statement . MW5 further says that first party signed Ex.M12 & Ex.M13 and he has identified the signature of the first party. He further says that during investigation first party said that certain amount he has withdrawn and he will repay the amount . He gave details of withdrawal 23. According to MW4 no written statements of the witnesses were recorded . In view of this it is difficult to belive the evidence of MW5 to prove anything against the workman. Ex.M14 and M15 are signed by the first party himself .

24. In his cross examination MW5 says that he was working as Cashier . He admits that he paid cash of all the cheques . With this cross examination it is clear that the cashier has passed the cheque and there is no direct evidence against the workman to establish that he has withdrawn the amounnt from the SB Account of the Customer ,

25. MW5 says in his cross cxamination that some of the cheques are not passed by him because scroll entry was done by the Manager and not the Cashier . He admits in his cross examination that after observing all the formalities he has passed the cheques . He says he cannot sayto whom the amount was paid . With this cross examination it is again clear that the management has not proved fraud and misappropriation of amount from SB Account. MW5 admits in his cross examination where Ex . M14 and Ex . M15 are written . With this cross examination it is very clear that Ex.M14 & M15 are not sufficient to help the first party workman responsible for having committed fraud and mis- appropriation. When the responsible Cashier , MW5 says that he does not know where Ex . M14 and Ex.M15 are written . Therefore , by placing reliance ofEx.M14 & M15 we cannot hold that the workman has committed fraud , forgery and misappropriation . These two documents are doubtful MW5 again admits in his cross examination that he was asked to sign Ex.M14 & M15 and he has sigued at the instance of Bank Manager. He categorically states in his cross examination that he might have reads them but he says he does not know what is written in them. He further says he has not read the letters . He further says that he does not know whether enquiry was held against Subash and was asked to pay the amount . With this cross examination of MW5 it is very difficult to placę reliance of Ex.M. 14 & M15. This is all the evidence after setting the DE .

26. The main contention of the management is that the workman has given confession letter and that confession letter is sufficient to hold him responsible for fraud, forgery and misappropriation and there- fore the action of the management is correct. In my opinion and in view of the evidence discussed there is no merit in this contention .

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

27. In view of the evidence of MW4 and MW5 which are discussed in detail , it is very difficult to believe the so called confession statement to hold first party workman alone guilty of misappropriation , fraud , forgery. Withdrawal slips filed by the manage- ment are not directly connect the workman for having withdrawal the amount. Some list of the customers are marked which are at Ex . P42 , 43 , 44 &45. According to Ex . P42 it is written that one Subash has withdrawn the amount from his account .

28. In view of these circumstances it is not safe to rely the so- called confession statement of the workman .

29. After settling aside the DE workman again got examined himself as WWI. He has stated in his evidence that he has not committed any fraud and he is not responsible for that. He categorically stated in his evidence that the management has forced him to sign Ex.M14 & M15 before the ins- pecting staff . He also says that all the documents were passed by the Manager . He has not known who has encaslied the cheque . He says he has not given amount . According to the material before me the workman was only a Peon . Of course he admits his signature in Ex.M14 and M15 .

30. WWI says in his cross - examination that he has not complained higher authority and police that the Manager has forced him to sign Ex.M12 to M15 and repaid the amount . Of course this cross examination would go to show that the workman has not complained to the higher authorities about the threat, but that itself is not sufficient to prove fraud and misappropriation . After all the work- man was working as a Peon and that in the given circumstances he might have not reported to the higher authorities .

31. The so -called Ex . M14 & M15 are the docu- ments relied by the management and the management has made much of these documents , but they are not sufficient.

32. I have read the written arguments given by the management and the workman in detail. Even according to the written Argument submitted by the management it is repeatedly states that the con- fession statement is sufficient to prove fraud , forgery and misapplication , but there is no merit in this arguments .

33. I have considered the decisions relied by the Management . Even according the Ex.14 & 15 it is not clearly made out by the management that the workman has/ misappropriated the amount because from whose account the amount is withdrawn is not given . Particulars and the amount of each SB account are not proved by the management.

297

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21, 1924

34 Taking all this into consideration it cannot be said that it is a clear admission of farud and forgery.

35. I have given my best consideration to the material before me and I am of the opinion that after the DE is set aside the management has not clearly established the alleged misappropriation, fraud and forgery. In other words the workman has given two letters and according to them the management has said that they are confessional statements .

36. Considering the circumstances I am of the opinion that the punishment of dimissal is too harsh. I have already said that the cross examination ofMW5 also throws doubt to believe Ex.M14 15 . In view of these facts I feel some lenient view can be taken by exercising powers of Section 11A of Industrial Dispute Act.

37. Accordingly 1 proceed to pass to the following Order:

ORDER

The reference is partly allowed. The order of dismissal is set aside and the management ' is directed to reinstate the workman with continuity of service . No back wages in the given circumstances are awarded . Accordingly reference is disposed off.

[Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 29th November 2002] .

V. N. KULKARNI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. था . 149. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रत न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 64/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-12-02 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल .-12012/142/ 2001-आई. आर . ( बी . II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचित्र New Delhi , the 16th December, 2002 S.O. 149- In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 64/2001 ) of the Central Govern- ment Industrial Triburial- cum -Labou Court , Bangalore as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-12-2002 .

[No. L- 12012/ 142 /2001 - IR (B - 11 )] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

298 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT

SHRAM SADAN " ,

III MAIN , III CROSS , II PHASE , TUMKUR ROAD , YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE .

Dated 27th November , 2002

PRESENT

HON'BLE SHRI V. N. KULKARNI, B. COM, LLB, PRESIDING OFFICER CGIT - CUM - LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE .

C. R. No. 64/2001

I PARTY

11 PARTY

S. S. Deshpande ,

K. K. Building ,

The Management , M/ s . Syndicate Bank, Represented by its General Manager ( P) , Head Office ,

So Shyamarao Deshpande Nagashetty Koppa , Near Shandilya Ashram , HUBLI - 580 023

Manipal , KARNATAKA STATE

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, has referred this dispute vide Order F. No. L-12012 /142/2001 - IR (B - II ) dated 11th September 2001 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Application under Section 10 of the ID Act for reference of the Industrial Dispute to CGIT. Cum LC . Bangalorc - Misc . Order No. 21/1999 dated 4-6-2001 , Misc . Order No. 1/2001 dated 4-6-2001 and Misc . Order No. 2/2001 dated 4-6-2001 .

ORDER

In view of the fact that the Govt . of India Ministry of Labour has referred this dispute , which is registered as CR NO . 46/2002, this application under Sub section 4A of Section 10 of the ID Act has filed by the workman direcily before this Tribunal is closed .

[Dictated to PA transerbied by her corrected and signed by me] .

V. N. KULKARNI , Presiding Officer

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर, 2002 का. आ . 150.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबंद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के र्बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 95/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-02 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-12012/155/ 98-आई. आर .(बी. II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th December , 2002

17 Court S. O. 150.-In Pursuance of Section of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 95/2002) of the Central Govern- ment Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Nagpur as shown in the annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in realtion to the management of Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002 .

[No. L- 12012/155/98-1R (B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL CENTRAL GOVERNMEN T TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR PRESENT SHRI B. G. SAXENA PRESIDING OFFICER

REFERENCE NO . CGIT : 95/2002 BANK OF INDIA

AND

SHRI KAILASH BHAUDAS BORKAR

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub Section ( 1) and Sub Sec- tion 2 ( A) of Soction 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 has roferred this dispute for adjudi- cation vide order No. L- 12042 / 155/ 98 /IR (B - II ) dt . 08-03-99 on the following schedule .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of management of Bank of India through Its Branch Manager , Amgaon Branch Distt . Bhandara and , Divisional Manager , [भाग II-खड 3 ( ii ) ]

Nagpur Zone , Bank of India Building , 3rd Floor , S. V. Patel Road , Nagpur , in terminating the services of Shri Kailash S/ o Bhaudas Borkar R/ o Amgaon , Distt . Bhandara (Maharashtra) w.e.f. 6-9-97 , is justified ? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled ? "

The Ministry of Labour, New Delhi had sent the aforesaid roference to C.G.I.T. , Jabalpur on 8-3-99 . The case was fixed there on 18-3-99 and both the parties were directed to submit evidence and documents on 18-3-99 . The case was thereafter adjourned to 12-11-99 and 14-2-2000 . The workman or his union representative did not submit Statement of Claim .

The file was received in this Court i.e. C.G. I.T. , Nagpur on 27-8-2002 . The notices were again issued to the parties for appearance on 26-9-2002.

On 26-9-02 the representative of the manage- ment appeared . On this date neither the work- man Kailash B Borkar appeared to file State- mont of Claim nor any representative of the union turned up to file Statement of Claim. ' The case was again adjourned to 2-12-2002 . Neither the workman turned up to file Statement of Claim nor any union representative submitted Statement of Claim for the workman . The case was then fixed up on 3-12-2002 . for orders .

any As the workman has not submitted Statement of Claim himself or through his union , relief can be granted . no

ORDER

The workman Kailash Bhaudas Borkar did not turn up to contest the case . He has not submitted any Statement of Claim . As the work- man did not file any Statement of Claim himself or through his union and documents have been filed by him , no relief can be granted to the workman . no

Workman Kailash B. Borkar has not submit- ted Statement of Claim , hence the reference is disposed of for want of prosecution .

B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ. 151. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल . आई . सी. ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुवन्ध में

299

भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/फौष 21 , 1924

निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि- करण/ श्रम न्यायालय नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 323/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 17011/10/ 97 -आई . आर . ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th December , 2002 S. O. 151. In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 323/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the managment of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002.

[No. L- 17011 / 10/97- IR ( B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR PRESENT : Shri B. G. Saxena , Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT : 323/2000 L.I.C. OF INDIA AND Shri M. J. Patil & S. D. Paunikar

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide order No. L- 17011 / 10/ 97/ IR ( B - II) dt . 28/ 31-8-1998 following schedule : on

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of LIC of India , Nagpur in not calling for interview to Shri M. J. Patil and Shri S. D. Paunikar for promotion to the grade of Assistant is elegal and justified ? If not , to what relief the said workmen are entitled ? " The Statement of Claim has been filed by General Secretary , T. K. Chakroborty for workmen , M. J. Patil, Record Clerk and S. D. Paunikar , Record Clerk . It is mentioned in the Statement of Claim that M. J. Patil was promoted as Record Clerk on 300 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21 , 1924

03-04-84 and S. D. Paunikar was promoted as Record Clerk on 02-05-85 . They had appeared in S.S.C. examination in November , 1979 and the result of the examination was declared on 23-01-80 .

Shri R. G. Bramhane had filed a Writ Petition bearing No. 1012/94 in Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court which was decided on 12-08-96. In the above Writ it was held that those who have gone through examination before the end of 1979 and were declared successful have to be read as pass in S.S.C. examination if qualified , before 1979. R. G. Bramhane was promoted as Assistant w.e.f. 1991 . M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar claimed that they should also be promoted from 1991 .

In the claim it is mentioned that the action of the management for not calling for interview to M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar from promotion to the grade of Assistant is not legal and justified.

The management contested the case on the ground that Life Lasurance Corporation has it's own rules for promotion and the method of selection for pro- motion to the employees of Class- IV . Only those are more meritorious are selected for promotion . The above workmen had appeared in S.S.C. exami- nation in November , 1979 and result was declared in January, 1980. Only those Record Clerks who had five years service as Record Clerk and have passed S.S.C. examination before 1979 were consi- ddered for promotion . The Corporation has stated that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Others versus Chandra Shekhar & Others reported in 1997 ( 4 ) Supreme Court Page No. 18 has interpreted the eligibility conditions for promo- tion and in view of this judgement M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar were not qualified for promotion as they have not passed S.S.C. examination upto December . 1979 .

It is further mentioned that both these workmen were considered for promotion after the judgement of Bramhane's case in the year 1996. M. J. Patil had been enlisted in the Contingency List (SC) for pramotion to the post of Assistant . S. D. Peunikar has not been found suitable and meritorious for promotion and as such not selected either .

These workmen had opted for promotion in the year 1996. They did not claim exemption for appea- rance for the departmental /promotional/ apptitude test. Both these workmen werc called for and appea- red for written test but failed thercin. Therefore , they were not called for Personal Interview. They have availed of the opportunity of Written Testby their own choice in seeking promotion and they are deemed to have waived their right to claim exemp- tion from Written Test. As they failed in the Written Test they can not claim the promotion .

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Both the parties produced oral and documentary evidence . They have also submitted their Written Arguments . Both the parties also argued the case orally.

I have considered the entire oral and documentary evidence on record .

The counsel for the management did not cross- examine the witnesses M. J. Patil. and S. D. Paunjkar.

From Shri Ramesh A. Godbole filed affidavit and he was cross -examined on 06-02-02 . He stated in cross- examination that who passed S.S.C. Examination after 1979 were not exempted for departmental test . R. G. Bramhane did not pass the Written Test . the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court 1997 (4) Supreme Court Cases , Page 18 it is evident that the criterio for eligibility for any post has been settled . In Ashok Kumar Sharma & Others versus Shri Chandra Shekhar & Others the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held :

"Where applications are called for prescribing a particular date to the last date for filing the appli- cations , the eligibility of the candidates shall have to be judged with reference to that date and that date alone . A person who acquires the prescribed qualification subsequent to such prescribed date cannot be considered at all . An advertisement or notification issued /published calling for applications constitutes a representation to the public and the authority issuing it is bound by such representation . It cannot act contrary to it . The reasoning in the majority opinion that by allowing the 33 respondents to appear for the interview, the recruiting authority was able to get the best talent available and that such course was in furtherance of public interest is , an impermissible justification . The minority opinion in the 1993 decision in Ashok Kumar Sharma case that the 33 respondents , who were not qualified on the date of submission of the application but had acquired the requisite qualification before the date of interview, could not have been allowed to appear for interview, was right . "

The view of the above ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1997 is clear . This judgement has been passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court after the decision of the judgment of Nagpur High Court in Bramhane's case in August , 1996, The R. G. Bramhane's case was decided by High Court on 12-08-96 . The Hon'ble Supreme Court had decided Ashok Kumar Sharma's case on 10-03-97 . Thus the ruling of the Supreme Court is latest on this point. In view of the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar are not entitled for their promotion in Assistant Grade from 1991 .

[भाग II-बड 3 (fi)]

301 भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21 , 1924

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday , the 26th November , 2002 Present : K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 638/2001

(Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court CGID No. 19/98) It is also clear that M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar had opted for their promotion in Assistant Grade and had moved their applications on 5-8-96 and 1-3-96. Both of them had appeared for Written Test . M. J. Patil and . S. D. Paunikar failed in the Written Test so they were not called for interview for selection to the post of Assistant . In the above circumstances it is evident that these workmen have still opportunity to qualify the departmental test for their promotion to the post of Assistant . In the above circumstances the action of the management of L.I.C. of India , Nagpur in not calling for inter- view to Shri M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar for promotion to the grade of Assistant is legal and justified.

ORDER

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the General Secretary, Indian Bank Employees Association on behalf of the workman Sri K. Thirulokachander and the Management of Indian Bank , Chennai ] .

BETWEEN

I Party/Claimant The action of the management of L.I.C. of India , Nagpur in not calling for interview to Shri M. J. Patil and S. D. Paunikar for promotion to the grade of Assistant is legal and justified . The workmen are not entitled to the relief claimed by them .

The General Secretary . Indian Bank Employees Association.

The reference is answered accordingly .

AND

Dated : 28-11-2002 .

B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer

The Deputy General Manager , II Party/ Management Indian Bank , Zonal Office , Chennai.

नई दिल्ली, 18 दिसम्बर, 2002

Appearance :

For the Claimant

M/ s . Rengaramanujam , Advocates:

M/ s . Aiyar & Dolia &

For the Management

N. Krishnakumar ,

Advocates .

का.आ. 152. औद्योगिक बिवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक वित्राद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 638/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-12-20022-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour in exer- cise of powers conferred by clause ( d) ' of sub - section. (1) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial. Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , have referred the concerned industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L- 12012/298 /97 / IR ( B - 11) dated 20-7-1998.

[सं. एल.-12012/ 298 / 97 -आई.अ.र. ( बी.- II ) ] सी.. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिवः

New Delhi , the 18th December , 2002

S.O. 152. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 638/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17-12-2002 .

[ No. L-12012 /298 / 97- IR ( B- 11 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

This reference has been made earlier to the Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai , where the same was taken on file as CGID No. 19/98 . When the matter was pending enquiry in that Principal Labour Court , the Government of India , Ministry of Labour was pleased to order transfer of this case also from the file of Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court to this Tribunal for adjudication . On receipt of records from that Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court, this case has been taken on file as I.D. No. 638/2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on record on either side , informing them about the transfer of this case to this Tribunal , with a direc- tion to appear before this Tribunal on 17-10-2001 with their respective parties and to prosecute this [PART If SEC. 3 ( il ) ) 302 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

case further. Accordingly , the learned counsel on either side along with their respective parties have appeared and prosecuted this case further The Claim Statement and Counter Statement of either side were filed earlier before the Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai , when the matter was pending there for adjudication.

Upon perusing the Claim Statement , Counter Statement , the documentary evidence let in on the side of the II Party/ Management alone , the other material papers on record , after hearing the argu- ments advanced by the learned counsel for the II Party/Management alone , and this matter having stood over till this date for consideration , this Tribunal has passed the following :

AWARD

The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above order of reference by the Central Govt . for adjudi- cation by this Tribunal is as follows :

"Whether the action of the manageinent of Indian Bank in not regularising the services of the workman is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The averments in the Claim Statement of the I Party/ Claimant Indian Bank Employees Association , Chennai (hereinafter refers to as Petitioner) are briefly as follows :

engaged at all . Hence , the Petitioner Union raised an industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) Chennai . As the concilia- tion ended in a failure , on submission of his failure of conciliation report to Government of India , the Govt . was pleased to refer this dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication. The concerned workman Thirulokachander has registered his name in Employ- ment Exchange. He has passed X standard and also holding heavy vehicle driving licence issued by the Institute of Road Transoort , Gummidipoondi . Thus the workman Thirulokachander Is fully qualified to hold the post of peon -cum-driver or peon or as driver under the Respondent /Manage- ment . The very fact that the concerned workman was in continuous employment for 650 days within a period of 27 months amply proves that there was continuous need for employment of the workman under the Respondent /Management . Though the employment of the workman is said to be a temporary one, in reality it is not so . He had been tempo- rarily engaged in a permanent vacancy caused due to the sudden demise of Sri Vanchinathan , a permanent driver. Yet the management had not taken any action to regularise the services of the concerned workmen Sri Thirulokachander or to grant him temporary status and to absorb him in a permanent vacancy that may arise in future. It is an unfair labou" practice followed by the Respondent taking advantage of the economical condition of the work- man and after extracting work from him and just throw him out of his employment without any notice The old colonial policy of hire and fire and had been ruthlessly followed by the Respondent Management being a public sector organisation . The bankman of this country are covered by Bipartite Settlement and Awards . The Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966 denne temporary employees in Chapter XX ( iii ) clause 20.7 and 20.8 and 20.12 and Clause 20.16 specifically deals with the engagement of temporary drivers . Therefore , the Petitione: Union submits that it is a permanent vacancy caused due to the death of a permanent driver and in his place the concerned workman was appointed . Though it . is said to be temporarily appointed on daily wages as and when required , the continuous engagement of the workinen amply proves the conti- nuous need of the workman . Moreover , since it is a sensitive post involving transmitting of cash, clearing of stationery , it cannot be entrusted to private drivers . Therefore, Clause 20.16 clearly states that for doing such bank work the existing private driver if he was already doing the bank work shall be given preference for appointment as a poon- cum-driver . Therefore , die to the exigencies of service , the Branch Manager Red Hills engaged the workman Sri Thirulokachander continuously for The Petitioner Union has raised this industrial dispute regarding the non - employment of the work- man Sri Thirulogachander , driver working under the control of the Branch Manager , Red Hill branch of the II Party/ Management Indian Bank at Chennai . The said workman Sri K. Thirulokachander was engaged as poon - cum- Driver by the Branch Manager from 18-6-94 in the vacancy caused due to sudden demise of Sri Vanchirathan, a permanent driver of the above branch . He had been engaged conti- nuously from the date of his appointment i.e. 18-6-94 to 20-9-96 with some breaks . During the period from 18-6-94 to 17-6-95 he had completed 295 days of sevrice and from 18-6-95 to 18-6-96 he had com- pleted 282 days . Thus , the workman Sri K. Thiruloka- chander had completed 240 days of se . vice in a ycar and also completed! 480 days within a period os 24 calendar months and thus attracting the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Confer- ment of Temporary Status to Worknmen ) Act, 1981 . Therefore, the Petitioner Union representing the workman represented the Respondent /Management to regularise his services . But the management with mala fide intention orally terminated the services of the workman Sri K. Thirulokachander from 20-9-96 onwards . Thereafter , the workman had not been 303

भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11,2003/ पोप 21,1924

[भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

650 days within the pod of 27 months . Th concerned workman was orally terminated from his service and he was not engaged since the Union represented to the Respondent /Management to regularise his services . The abrupt stoppage of the workmon from 20-9-96 without any notice and without following the procedure laid down under section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is wholly unjustified , illegal and arbitrary . Neither notice nor notice pay in lieu of notice was not paid to the workman as contemplated in Section 25F of the Industriel Disputes Act, 1947. As per clause 20.12 the temporary workman will be given prefernce while filling up permanent vacancy. Since it comes under class IV category . Employment Exchange Compulsory Notification Act will not be applicable to the concerned workmaan . Since the workman was engaged by the Branch Manager as per clause 20.16 of the Bipartite Settlement in the permanent vacancy for more than 240 days in a year and 480 days within a period of 24 months . The concerned workman Thirulokachander is having preferential treatment and is having vested right over the existing vacancy of Driver under the Respondent/ Manage- ment . There are several vacancies to absorb the workman into service , yet the management is refusing to re-engage the concerned workman and to regularise his services . In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above , the Petitioner Union prays that this Hon'ble Tribunal may direct the Respondent to absorb the workman into service in the exsiting vacancy and to regulrise the scrvice of the workman .

3. The averments in the Counter Statement filed by the II Party/ Management Indian Bank , Chennai (hereinafter refers to as Respondent) are briefly as follows :

regularisation or absorption into the services of the bank. Sri Thirulokachander's engagement itself was unauthorised as it was in violation of the directives of the Government of India regarding engagement of personnel on temporary basis and also was not in accordance with the settlement entered into between the bank management and its recognised unions . The concerned workman engage- ment was unauthorisedly done at the branch level without the approval and sanction of the compe- tent authority viz . Zonal Manager , Chennai . Such unauthorised engagements not even brought to the notice of the said competent authority. It is the fact the Sri Thirulokachander was never engaged on any permanent basis but he was engaged only on day to day basis . Hence , the question of the termi- nation of service does not arise . Mere engagement of a person on ad -hoc/ temporary /casual basis does not confer any right for regular absorption . Mere registration of Sri Thirulokachander name in the Employment Exchange done at his instance does not confer upon him and right for regular absorption . It is a fact that his candidature was sponsored by Employment Exchange as there has been no occasion for the Respondent /Bank to request the Employment Exchange to sponsor candidates . The real fact that the concerned workman was unauthorisedly engaged purely on casual basis does not mean the vacancy, if any , has to be filled up by absorbing him . The Respondent/Bank is a Government of India Under- taking and is bound by the guidelines and policies issued by the Government of India from time to time . All the policies regarding recruitment and placement of personnel are based on the guidelines and policies of the Government of India and also the settlement entered into with the recognised unions . There is no unfair labour practice as falsely alleged in the Claim Statement. The provisions of Bipartite Settlement referred to in the Claim Statement has no appli- cation to the case of Sri Thirulokachander . These clauses apply only to such of those persons who had been engaged as temporary employees from the panel made by the bank in accordance with the settlements entered into by the bank with the recognised union and with the candi- dates sponsored by Employment Exchange . Sri Thirulokachander was and is not in the panel of temporary sub - staff nor has been sponsored by Employment Exchange . Therefore , the question of giving preference to him in the matter of filling permanent vacancies , if any , does not arise . Sri Thirulokachander has no right to make any claim for absorption . The terms of reference do not relate to the termination of engagement of Sri Thiruloka- chander, but it is for regularisation of service . As his engagement was on day to day basis and on daily wages the reference to Section 25F of Indus-

was The concerned workman though styled as a tempo- rary workman by the Petitioner Union , he working only on casual basis . The Respondent , Bank has been having a system of maintaining a panel of temporary sub - staff to work in the leave vacancies of permanent sub - staff going on leave in branch attached to zonal offices . The engagement of empanelled sub - staff has been on day to day basis and such casual employees are paid daily wages . The terms of reference do not relate to termination of the engagement of Sri Thirulokachander. On the other hand , it relates to claim for regularisation. The reference made to Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981 is misplaced and it has no application to nationalised banks including the Respondent / Bank . Being a casual employee engaged on day to day basis the allegation that he had worked for 240 days in 1994-95 and 1995-96 has no relevance and the same does not confer any right on him to claim

3889 GI /2002-21 .

30.1

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

vant . trial Disputes Act , 1947 is not applicable and rele- Therefore the question of other things being equal provided for under para 20.12 of the Bipartite Settlement does not arise and therefore , giving pre- ference in the matter of giving employment to him does not arise . It is not in accordance with para 20.16 of the Bipartite Settlement as he was engaged on day to day basis . For invoking the said clause he should have been in the temporary panel of sub- staff or he should have been brought into the bank through Employment Exchange. The fact that the settlements if any were entered into in the past does not mean necessarily that they are applicable to the case of Sri Thirulokachander . Exigencies do not warrant absorption of Sri Thirulokachander , when the management by virtue of its managerial powers to control and regulate placement of its employees by an internal transfer , post a driver at Red Hills branch before doing away with casual engagement ef Thirulokachander . The circumstances in which the settlements entered would be different and have no precedents for the union to claim party and preference in stating the claim for absorption of Sri Thirulokachander . The concerned workman does not fall within the eligibility criteria and the vacancy at the branch has been already filled up . Therefore, there is no substance in the allega- tions made in the claim statement . For all the reasons mentioned above , the Respondent/Bank prays that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to reject the claim of the Petitioner Union .

4. When the matter was taken up for enquiry finally, no one has been examined on either side as a witness . No documentary evidence has been let in on the side of the I Party/ Claimant . Documents filed on the side of the II Party/ Management were marked by consent as Ex. MI and M3 . The argu- ment advanced by the learned counsel for the II Party/Management alone was heard .

5. The Point for my consideration is :

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank in not regularising the services of the workman is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

Point :

In the schedule of reference, the name of the workman concerned in this dispute has not been mentioned . It is the consistent plea on either side that the concerned workman in this industrial dis- pute , whese cause is espoused by the Petitioner Union is Mr. K. Thirulokachauder . The Petitioner Union who raised this industrial dispute on behalf of the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander

claiming a direction to the Respondent by this Tri- bunal to absorb the workman Sri Thirulokachander into service in the existing vacancy and to regularise his service has not chosen to let in any oral or docu- mentary edence in support of the averments made for the relief sought for under this petition. The concerned workman also has not chosen to examine himself to speak about his employment with the Respondent /Management and also about his period▾ of service . No document also has been filed before thìs Tribunal în support of the contention of the Petitioner Union about the period of service of the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander and for the alleged continuous engagement of the concerned work- man , as Peon cüm Driver by the Branch Manager ef Red Hills of the Respondent /Bank . The Respondent Management in their Counter Statement has clearly stated that the Petitioner was working only on casual basis and that being the casual employee engaged on day to day basis . No right has been conferred on hìm tô claim regularisation or absorption into the services of the bank. So , under such circumstances , the burden of proof that the concerned workman had worked continuously for the period of 295 days from 18-6-92 to 17-6-95 and 282 days froin 18-6-95 to 18-6-96 is on the I Party/ Claimant Union . It is not the case of the Petitioner Union that he has been duly appointed as per the provisions of recruitment or his name has been included in the panel temporary staff maintained by the Respondent/Bank . It is the specific contention of the Respondent/ Bank that the engagement of the einpanelled sub - staff has been ou day to day basis and such casual employees are paid daily wages , when they were engaged temporarily in the vacancies of the permanent sub- staff going on leave. It is not disputed that the concerned work- man was engaged only on daily wages by the Branch Manager of the Red Hill branch , Chennai , without observing the proper procedure in vogue in the Respondent/Management for recruitment . It is specifically averred in the counter itself that the concerned workman was never engaged on any permanent basis and the engagement of Sri Thiru- lokachander by the branch was unauthorised as it was a violation of the directives of Government of India regarding engagement of personnel on tempo- rary basis and also was not in accordance with the Settlement entered into between the bank manage- ment and its recognised union . It is the further allegation of the Respondent /Management in their Counter Statement that the said unauthorised engage- ment was done at the branch level without th:: approval and sanction of the competent authority i, e . the Zonal Manager , Chennai and such engagement was not even brought to the notice of the said com- petent authority. To dispute this specific averment of the Respondant in their Counter Statement, the 305 भारत का राजपत्न: जनवरी 11 , 2003/पौष 21,1924

[भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

pondent bank branch . Hence , under such circums- tances , it can be said that the claim of the Petitioner Union on behalf of the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander that the Respondent/ Management has to re - engage the concerned workman and to regularise his service is not correct and the contention of the Petitioner Union that Sri Thirulokachander is having preferential treatment and is having vested right over the existing vacancy of driver under the Respondent /Management is also not correct . Even for invoking a clause mentioned in para 20-16 of Bipartite Settlement , the concerned workman ought to have been in the temporary panel of sub - staff or he should have been brought into the panel through Employment Exchange . So, in the absence of this , the claim of the 1 Party/ Union on behalf of the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander that he must be given preference for appointment as a peon- cum-driver cannot be accepted as correct . So , under such circumstances , as the said workman Sri Thirulokachander does not fall within the eligibility criteria, and when the said vacancy has already said to have been filled upby the Respondent/ Manage- ment as it is contended by the Respondent/Manage- ment , there is no substance in the averments made by the Petitioner Union in their Claim Statement that the Respondent/Management is refusing to re-engage the concerned workman and to regularise his service . So on the basis of the available materials in this case , it can be concluded that the non - engage- ment of the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander by the Respondent/ Indian Bank Management and not regularising his service as a workman is justified and legal . Hence , the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief . Thus , the point is answered accordingly.

6. In the result, an Award is passed holding that the concerned workman Sri K. Thirulokachander is not entitled for any relief. No cost .

(Dictated to the Stenographer , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 26th November , 2002. )

K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer

Witneses Examined: ---

None

Description

On either Side Documents Exhibited :- For the I Party/ Claimant :- For the II Party/ Manageinent :- Date Nil

Ex.

No.

M1 30-09-78 Xerox copy of the Government of . India Notification regarding re- cruitment of sub - staff through Employment Exchange .

Peti ioner Union has not filed any reply statement nor let in any acceptable oral or documentary evi- dence. It is further contended in the Counter State- ment of the Respondent that as the engagement was o.ly on day to day basis and on daily wages , and he was /is not in the panel of temporary sub - staff nor has he been sponsored by Employment Exchange , the question of giving preference to him in the matter of filling permanent vacancies , if any , does not arise and hence, the question of giving notice or notice pay under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not arise . It is the specific plea in the Claim Statement itself that the services of the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander was orally terminated from 20-9-96 onwards . It is not the case of the Petitioner Union that for the alleged temporary engagement of the concerned workman when a permanent vacancy caused by the demise of Sri Vanchinathan was by way of any appointment order . So under such circumstances , the burden is lying upon the Fetitioner Union to prove their claim that the concerned workman Sri Thirulokachander had worked continuously for more than 240 days and his services were terminated without paying retrench- ment compensation, when it has been specifically denied by the Respondent/ Management in their Counter Statement. The claimant Union ought to have let evidence to show that the concerned work- man had worked for 240 days in preceding year by producing receipt of salary or wages or letter of appointment. Mere making a statement in the Claim Statement is not sufficient evidence , as it is its own statement . The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a case reported as 2002 I LLJ 1053 Range Forest Officer Vs. S. T. Hadimoni is squarely applicable to the facts of this case . In the absence of proof to establish the plea that the concer- ned workman had worked for 240 days to claim the benefits under Section 25F of the Act , it cannot be said that the Respondent/ Bank Management had violated the procedure laid down under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is notdis- puted that there are Government of India notifica- tions and instructions by way of circulars issued by the bank management to all the branches as norms for engagement of sub - staff and there are settlements entered into with the recognised unions in respect of deploying persons who have been empanelled to engage in the leave vacancies in the sub - staff cadre . The Xerox copies of those Government of India notifications dated 30-9-78 and norms for engage- ment of sub - staff as instructions issued by the Res- pondent/Bank management dated 4-3-83 and the settlement entered with the recognised union dated 6-7-92 have been marked with the consent of the counsel for the Petitioner as Ex . MI to M3 . On the basis of these documents , admittedly , the con- cerned workman has not béen engaged by the Res- 306 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

M2 04-03-83 Xerox copy of the circular issued by Head Office of Indian Bank to all branches regarding norms for engaging temporary sub - staff.

M3 06-07-92 Xerox copy of the memorandum of settlement u/s 12(3 ) between the management of Indian Bank and Federation of Indian Bank Employees Unions in the matter of persons engaged in leave vacancies of sub - staff .

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2002 का. आ . 153:-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार रिजर्व बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियो- जकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी. आर. 52/93) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13/12/02 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-12012/132/ 93-आई . आर. ( बी. -1) ] एल.-12012/135 , 137, 138 व 139/ 93-आई . आर . (बी-1)

[एल.-12012/ 246/ 93- आई. आर. ( बी.-I ) ] अजय कुमार , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th December , 2002 S.O. 153. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( C.R. No. 52/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Reserve Bank of India and after workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-12-2002.

[No. L - 12012 / 132 / 93 - IR ( B - I ) , L-12012/135/93- IR( B -1 ) ,

L-12012 /137/ 93 - IR ( B - I ) ,

L- 12012/ 138 & 139/ 93 - IR( B - I ) , L-12012/ 246/ 93 - IR ( B - I ) ]

AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE Dated: 29th November , 2002

PRESENT :

Hon'ble Shri V. N. Kulkarni , B.Com .. LLB , Presiding Officer ,

CGIT- cum- Labour-Court, BANGALORE .

COMMON AWARD C.R. No. 52/93

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

I PARTY

Shri S. Ramalingam , No. 1 , Webster Road , Cox Town, Bangalore - 560005.

II PARTY

The Manager ,

Reserve Bank of India , Nrupathunga Road ,

Bangalore- 560009.

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers con- ferred by clause ( d) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012 / 132/93 - IR ( B - I ) dated 10th September, 1993 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Reserve Bank of India is justified in dismissing Shri S. Ramalingam , a Mazdoor from service ? If not , to what relief he is entitled to ? "

C.R. No. 53/93

I PARTY

Shri M. Devadas ,

No. 47 , 9th Cross ,

Someswaranagar ,

Jayanagar I Block ,

Bangalore - 560011 .

II PARTY

The Manager ,

Reserve Bank of India,

Nrupathunga Road ,

Bangalore-560009.

The Central Government by exercising the powers con- ferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/ 135/ 93-1R ( B - 1 ) dated 10th Sep- tember , 1993 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action taken by the management of Reserve Bank of India , Bangalore in dismissing Shri M. Devadas , Mazdoor, from service is justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled to ? "

C.R. No. 54/93

I PARTY

Shri Puttanna,

No. 425, 1 Main Road,

7th Block,

Koramangala Lay out, Bangalore- 560035 .

II PARTY

The Manager,

Reserve Bank of India , Nrupathunga Road ,

Bangalore- 560009 .

The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/ 137 /93 - IR ( B- 1 ) dated 10th Sep- tember , 1993 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Reserve Bank of India is justified in dismissing Shri Puttanna , General Mazdoor from service ? If not , to what relief he is entitled to ?" 307

भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11,2003 / पौष 21,1924

[भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

C.R. No. 55/93

I PARTY

Shri K. Narayanaswamy ,

55 , Kadiranapalya , Indiranagar, Bangalore-560038.

II PARTY

The Manager ,

Reserve Bank of India , Nrupathunga Road , Bangalore -560009.

The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub -section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012 / 138 /93 - IR (B - 1 ) dated 10th September, 1993 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action taken by the management of Reserve Bank of India is justified in dismissing Shri Narayanaswamy from service is justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled to ? "

C.R. No. 56/93

I PARTY

Shri B. Jayaraj ,

No. 77 . JohnBull Street, Viveknagar , Post , Bangalore -560047 .

II PARTY

The Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Nrupathunga Road , Bangalore- 560009.

The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/ 139 /93-1R(B - 1 ) dated 10th September , 1993 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action taken by the management of Reserve Bank of India in dismissing Shri B. Jayaraj . Mazdoor from service is justifiable ? If not, to what relief he is catitled to ?"

C.R. No. 38/94

I PARTY

Shri Kuchelan ,

No. B-8 ,

Reserve Bank of India , Staff Quarters , Osborne Road , Bangalore- 560042.

IF PARTY

The Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Nrupathunga Road , Bangalore - 560002 .

The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012 /246/ 93-1R ( B - 1 ) dated 28th March , 1994 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Reserve Bank of India is justified in dismissing Shri R. Kuchelan , Coin Note Examiner from service ? If not , to what relief he is entitled to ?"

2. These six disputes are clubbed together and a Common Award is passed in C.R. No. 52/93 with a direction to keep a copy of this award in C.R. No. 53/93 , 54/93 , 55/93 , 56/93 and in C.R. No. 38/94 .

3. Some of the workmen were working as Peon and others as Clerks / Coin Note Examiners with the Reserve Bank of India . The Claim Statement of all the workmen is similar. The misconduct alleged against the workmen is that they have caused monetary loss to the bank by substituting the non defaced notes in the packets which were received earlier and examined and thereby misappropriated the amounts in thousands and given charge sheets to all these workmen in pursuance of Regulation 47 of the Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations 1948. The claim statements are common in nature except following facts connected to quantum of amount and the methods employed of other things are in common.

4. Regarding Domestic Enquiry the contention of the workmen is that the charges are vague and lacks material particulars and the charge memo does not contain the list of documents and the list of witnesses through whom a charge were sought to be sustained .

5. It is seen from the records that criminal proceedings was also filed in the year 1981 before the first Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Bangalore and during the pen- dency of the criminal case departmental enquiry is held .It is contented by the workmen and the DE is not proper . The enquiry was commenced immediately after the issue of charge sheet and the witnesses Jayavelu and EPS Subra- maniam were not tendered for cross examination . The assis- tance of a lawyer to defend the case was not given . Work- men for these reasons and for some other reasons has prayed to pass an award in their favour.

6. In all these cases similar Counter Statement is filed by the Management.

7. Regarding DE it is contented by the management that the charge sheet was not vague . A lengthy investigation was conducted before initiating the domestic enquiry . Copies of documents and list of witnesses were made available to the workmen . All the allegations made by the workmen are not correct . K. M. Mathew who was examined for all these cases was tendered for cross examination individually .

8. The enquiry was conducted by Shri Vinay Nayak who was working as Assistant Manager at the relevant point of time. C.R. No. 52/93 is the first case and the Enquiry Officer was examined . Management for these reasons and for some other reasons has prayedto reject the reference .

9. It is seen from the records that my learned predecessor by his order dated 1st October, 1999 has held in all these cases by passing the common order that the Domestic Enquiry is fair and proper and preliminary issue in all these cases was answered in the Affirmative . Thereafter the case was posted for arguments on merits .

10. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the workmen. I have also heard the learned counsel appearing for the management. I have carefully perused the Written Arguments given by the parties . I have also read the relevant decisions.

11. It is submitted by the counsels appearing for the parties that Criminal Case is still pending .

12. Now that the DE is held as fair and proper we will have to see whether the finding given by the Enquiry Officer in all these cases is correct or the same is perverse . Fact remains that there is some delay in initiating the departmental enquiry by the management because the alleged incident occurred in the year 1977 and the charge sheet was issued in April . 1985. According to the workmen Shri K. M. Mathew is not examined hefore this Tribunal and when he gave evidence during the DE . was not tendered for cross examination, 308

[PART ' I -SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

13. Now that the enquiry is held as fair and proper, the workmen at this stage cannot submit that the enquiry is not fair and proper and no opportunity was given to the work- men to defend themselves during the enquiry . My learned predecessor has given Affirmative finding on the Preliminary issue holding that the DE is Fair and Proper . In other words the procedure followedby the Enquiry Officer is fair and proper when the enquiry was conducted.

14. I have gone through the entire enquiry proceedings of all these cases and I have also read the finding given by the Enquiry Officer : In my opinion the finding given by the Enquiry Officer is correct and there is no perversity in it because full opportunity was given to the workman to defend himself during the enquiry .

15. The Enquiry Officer has relied upon the evidence of Mr. D. P. G. Subramanian who had explained the manner to which sorting of issuable and non issuable netes is done . The learned counsel appearing for the workmen could not convince me as to how the finding is perverse .

16. It was submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the workmen that some of the workmen have already ex- pired and some of them are shortly retiring and the fact that since very long time these workmen are before this tribuna! challenging the dismissal order and all of them have become very old and it is a fit case to invoke the provisions of Section 11A of the I.D. Act and order of dis- missa! be set aside and they may be made compulsory retired so that they will get same retirement benefits .

17. It was also argued that one of the workmen has expired long back and his LR may be given monetary benefits .

18. Against this it is only contented by the Second Party management that the misconduct is serious and the order of dismissal is proper and this is not a fit case to invoke the provisions of Section 11A of the I.D. Act .

19. Considering the entire material before me I am of the opinion that this is a fit case to invoke the provisions of Section 11A of the 1.D. Act and accordingly I proceed to pass the following Order :

ORDER

The reference is partly allowed and the order of dismissal is converted to Compu'sery Retirement . The LRs of the dead workmen , the workmen who have retired and the work- men who are about to retire may be given retirement benefit as per rules . Accordingly these six cases are disposed off.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 29th November , 2002. )

V. N. KULKARNI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर , 2002

का. आ. 154 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध सरकार नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी० जी० आई० टी० 04/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/305/ 2001-आई . आर . (बी-1) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 17th December , 2002 S.O. 154. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( CGIT - 04/ 2002 ) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal , Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and ineir workman , which was receivedby the Central Govern- 2eat on 16-12-2002.

[No. L-12012/ 305 /2001 - IR ( B . 1 ) ) AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR

PRESENT:

Shri B. G. Saxena , Presiding Officer . Reference No. CGIT 04/2002

State Bank of India.

AND The Asstt . Gen. Secretary , S.B.I.

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by excrcising the powers conferred by Clause ( d) of Sub- Section ( 1 ) and Sub- Section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Indus- trial Dispute Act , 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudi- cation vide order No. L - 12012 / 303 / 2001 -JR ( B - I ) dated 26-11-2001 on foliowing schedule .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India , Zonal Office , Nagpur in awarding punish- ment of discharge from the Bank's service to Shri M. M. Thakre , Ex -Messenger w.e.f. 22-11-1999 is justified ? If not , what relief the said workman is en: itled ?"

This reference was received in March , 2002. Notices were issued to the parties , 02-04-02 , 23-04-02 , 11-06-02 , 30-07-02 were fixed for tiling Statement of Claimby the workman but neither the workman turned up nor any union representative of the workinan turned up to file Statement of Claim .

The case was adjourned to 27-08-02 . On this date a letter was received from Asstt . General Secretary of the State Bank of lodia Staff Union that S. D. Lapalikar , Asstt . Secretary of The union has been authorised to represent workman M. M. Thakre in this case . The union wants one month time to submit Statement of Claim . The case was therefore adjour- ned to 17-10-02 for filing Statement of Clim hy the work " man.

On 17-10-02 also neither the union represenetative turned up to represent the workman nor the workman appeared in the Court to submit the Statement of Claim . The case was again adjourned to 22-11-02 for filing Statement of Claim by the workman . Today also no Statement of Claim has been filed by the workman M. M. Thakre or his union representative S. D. Lapalikar .

As no Statement of Claim has been filed by the workmen and be is repeatedly avoided appearence in Court to con- test his case, no relief can be granied to him . The reference is therefore disposed of for want of prosecution.

ORDER

The workman M. M. Thakre has not turned up before this Tribunal to contest the case and no Statement of Claim has been filed by him inspite of providing him sufficient opportu- nity to file Statement of Claim , the reference is disposed of for want of prosecution .

Date: 22-11-02.

B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer भाग 11 -व४ 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर , 2002 का. ग्रा . 155-ग्रौद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पश्चिमी रेलवे, कोटा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बोत्र , अनुबन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अंधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी.- 62/ 2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 41011/34/ 86-डी. -II बी. ग्राई . आर . ( बी. - 1 ) ] अजय कुमार डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 17th December , 2002 S.O. 155. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. No. 62/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Western Railway , Kota and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002 .

[No. L- 41011 / 34 / 86-D . II B / IR ( B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL . GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , LUCKNOW PRESENT :

Rudresh Kumar , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 62/2002 (Delhi No. 2/89 ) Ref. No. L- 41011 / 34/ 86 - D . II( B) dated nil

BETWEEN

The Divisional Secretary , Pashchim Railway Karmchari Parishad ,

Kota.

AND

The Divisional Railway Manager , Western Railway , Kota , Jn . -324002 .

AWARD

By order No. L- 41011 /34/86 - D . II ( B ) dated nil, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , in exercise of powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and Section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the I.D. Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between the Divisional Secretary, Pashchim Railway Karmachari Parishad , Kota (espousing cause of Smt . Pato Bai and Ratanla ! ) and the Divisional Railway Mangaer, Western Railway , Kota for adjudication to the CGIT- cum - Labour Court , New Delhi . Later. vide order No. 7-20025 / 54 /2001 - CLS - II dated 19-4-2002 . this case was transferred to this tribunal for adiudication.

The reference under adjudication is as under :

"Whether the demand . of P.R.K.P. for promotion of Pato Bai , waiting room bearer and Ratanlal Swami , telegraph peon under SS . Kota with effect from 1-8-1982 is justified ? If so , to what relief are the workman entitled to ?"

2. The representative union , raised a common industrial dispute in respect of Smt. Pato Bai , Waiting Room Bearer . and Ratanlal Swami , Telegraph Peon , working under the

309

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11,2003/पौष 21,1924

Station Supdt. Western Railway , Kota. In the course of the proceedings, Simt. Pato Bai died . His daughter- in - law Smt. Sumitra filed application stating that her mother- in - law died on 9-11-92 and on her place , his only son Ramjilal was given compassionate appointment . He also died in the year 1993 , and after his death she was given compassionate appointment in the Western Railway at Kota, where she is working at present. She did not desire to pursue the case of her mother- in-law and further. By order dated 10-10-2002 , this Tribunal passed a 'No Claim Award' in relation to claim of Pato Bai deceased. Thus , a part of the reference has already been answered in shape of ' No Claim Award".

The other part of the reference: relates to Rattan Lal Swami, allegedly , engaged as substitute w.e.f. 14-10-50 under the Divl . Railway Manager , Western Railway , Kota. He was regularised in Class IV on 22-3-53 . and put to work as Bishti under Station Master Sawaimadhopur. He was transferred and posted as Plateform Porter under Station Master Ram- ganj Mandi . In November , 1953 and later transferred to Idgah in December, 1954. He was promoted as Pionts Man in the scale of Rs . 35-50 ( P ) and posted Under Station Master Bayana in 1957. Later , he was promoted as Seniors Points Man and continued in the scale of Rs . 80-110 ( A) up to 1973. He was selected as Block Signal Man in the grade of Rs . 120-155 (A) in 1965 and was deputed for train- ing to Zonal Training Institute , Udaipur, and passed his training successfully but was deprived of his legitimate chance of betterment. He was put to work as Points Jamadar in the scale of Rs . 80-110 (A) under Station Master Kota since 1973. This scale was later revised to Rs . 210-270 w.e.f. 1-1-73 and he continued in the said scale upto 1975. He was medi- cally decategorised on 14-10-75 and recommended for hearing aid. After decategorisation , he was posted as Telegraph Peon on 30-11-75 in the lower scale of Rs . 196-232 ( R ) and his pay fixed at maximum of the scale i.e. Rs . 232 although, he was drawing Rs . 238 r.m. in his substantive scale Rs . 210-270 ( R) . The workman raised industrial dispute to challenge lowering of his scale and also forfeiting his pay by fixing him at lower sum than he used to draw at the time of decategorisation. He was also denied upgradation from the year 1980 .

4. The management admitted that the workman had passed. Block Signal Man examination from Zonal Training Insti- tute , Udaipur, but justified his non promotion as he was undergoing various punishments under the Disciplinary and Anreal Rules . While working as Points Jamadar in the scale of Rs . 80-110 ( A ) which was revised to Rs . 210-270 ( R ) , he was medically decategorised and declared medically unfit in the category A/2 . He was found fit in category C/ 1 vide medical certificate No. 81/1 dated 31-10-75 . Consequently. he was absorbed as Telegraph Peon in the scale of Rs . 196-232 ( R ) at Kota, fixing his pay at the maximum. This alternative job was provided to him on compassionate ground otherwise his services could have dispensed with on medica! ground . The management further pleads that on upgradation of nost . Mr. Prava Singh a senior to workman was promoted in the higher scale . The management denies any discrimination . The management has further stated that the workman had given his option on 17-11-75 to work on the post of Telegranh Peon and so , he was put on the said nost by offering him alternative employment by order dated 28-11-75 . At this distance of time, after surerannuation , he has no locus standi to aritate his posting as Telegraph Peon .

5. The workman has not denied giving option on 17-11-75 for alternate appointment as Telegraph Peon , in a lower scale . He was medically decategorised and was not entitled to be retained on the post of Points Jamadar . There appears no illegality in the action of the management to retain him in alternate inh carrying lesser pay scale . particularly , on his antion. His pay was fixed at maximum of scale i.e. Rs. 232 p.m. The workman has since retired and is not entitled to any posting . His claim is not sustainable , as far as his posting as Telegraph Peon is concerned. However, the workman , at the time of decateporisation was drawing Rs. 238 m. and as consequence of his posting, his nav wos fixed at Rs . 232 only which was maximum of the srale, Acparent'v . the workman was put to pecuniary disadvantage of Rs. 6 nm . The management should have allowed this amount as a personal nav. By not nermitting to draw Rs r.m. as personal nav. the management forfeited his rav which is not permissible in law.

310 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA. 21 , 1924

6. The workman was also entitled to Rs . 6 p.m. with DA admissible thereon from the date of his fixation of pay at Rs . 232 till the date of his retirement . This will be very difficult for the workman to seek computation hence it is expedient to fix a lump sum amount towards full and final settlement . Taking into consideration loss of Rs . 6 p.m. and other allowances thereon , a sum of Rs . 5000 ( Five Thousand) only seems to be just and proper relief in favour of the workman againt the management .

7. Accordingly , the award is partly in favour of the work- man . He is entitled to Rs . 5000 ( Five Thousand ) only to- wards full and final settlement of his claim .

Lucknow :

11-12-2002

RUDRESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर, 2002

का.आ. 156:-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे बम्बई, वी.टी. के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार श्रम न्याया- लय नं . I मुम्वई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्याएल. सी. बी. -142/ 1995) को प्रकाशित्त करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था

[सं.एल.-41024/ 2/ 2002-आई . आर. (बी. - 1 ) ] अजय कुमार डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 17th December , 2002 S.O. 156. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCB - 142 of 1995) of the Cen- tral Government Labour Court , No. - I Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the em- ployers in relation to the management of Central Railway , Bombay V.T. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002.

[No. L-41024 / 2 / 2002- IR ( B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT NO . 1 MUMBAI

PRESENT :

Shri Justice S. C. Pandey , Presiding Officer . Misc. Application No. 142 of 1995 PARTIES :

Shri S. Y. Balel : Applicant . Vis .

The Chief Commercial Manager

: Opponent .

Central Rly . Bombay V. T.

APPEARANCES :

For the applicant Shri Anchan , Adv .

for the Opponent Ms. Fernandes .

Mumbai , dated the 4th day of December, 2002

JUDGEMENT

Today, when the matter was taken up for cross - examina- tion, the learned counsel for the applicant Shri M. B. Anchan ,

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( 0 ) ] Advocate filed an application stating that the applicant does not want to contest the application . In view of the application filed by the learned counsel for the applicant , this matter is dismissed as not pressed .

S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 18 दिसम्बर , 2002

का.आ. 1.57 :-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत ओवरसीज बैंक लि . के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 61/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल .12012/ 38/ 98-आई. आर . (बी.-I) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th December, 2002 S.O. 157. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( 61/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Governemnt on 17-12-2002 .

[No. L- 12012 /38 / 98 -IR ( B . 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT , CHENNΑΙ Wednesday, the 11th December , 2002 PRESENT :

K. Karthikeyan , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ΝΟ . 61/2001 (Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 72/1999) [In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Workman Sri E. K. Ravi and the Manage- ment of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. , Chennai.l

BETWEEN

Sri E. K. Ravi .

I Party/ Workman AND

The Chairman- cum- Managing Director, Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd., Chennai . II Patry/ Management APPEARANCE :

For the Workman : M/ s . Balan Haridas R. Kamatchi Sundaresan , Advocates .

For the Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co. , Advocates.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) cf sub - section ( 1 ) and [भाग II--खंड 3 ( 11 ) ]

Quo - section . 2 ( A) of Section 10 , of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , have referred the concerned industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L- 12012 / 38 /98 - IR (B -I) dated 28-08-1998 .

This reference has been made earlier to the CGIT-Cum- Labour Court, Bangalore , where the same was taken on file as C.R. No. 80/98 and as per the orders of the Ministry of Labour , Government of India dated 5-3-99 , this case has been transferred to Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal Chennai , where this case was taken on file as I.D. No. 72/99 . When the inatter was pending enquiry in that Tribunal, Government of India , Ministry of Labour was pleased to order transfer of this case also from the file of Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal to this Tribunal for adjudication . On receipt of reocrds from that Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal, this case has been taken on file as I.D. No. 61/2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on record on either side, informing them about the transfer of this case to this Tribunal , with a direction to appear before this Tribunal on 29-01-2001 with their respective parties and to prosecute. this case further . Accordingly , the Icarned counsel on either side along with their respective parties have appeared and prosecuted this case further . The Claim Statement of the Party /Workman and the Counter Statement of the II Party / Management, and the reply statement of the I Party /Work- man were filed before the Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal itself, when this case was pending adjudication there in the file of that Tribunal .

Upon perusing the Claim Statement , Counter Statement . and the reply statement of either parties , the oral and docu- mentary evidence let in on either side , the other material papers on record , after hearing the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the II Party/ Management alone and this matter having stood over till this date for consideration , this Tribunal has passed the following :---

AWARD

The Industrial Disptue referred to in the above mentioned order of reference by the Central Government for adjudica- tion by this Tribunal is as follows:-

"Whether the action of the management in o'smissing Sri E. K. Ravi from service is justified If not , the workman is entitled to what relief ? " 2. The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the I Party /Workman Sri E. K., Ravi ( hereinafter refers to as Petitioner ) are briefly as follows :-

The Petitioner joined the service of the Il Party/ Manage- ment Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd.. Chennai ( hereinafter refers to as Respondent ) as sub- staff on 1st Julv, 1983. He had put in 13 vears of blemishless record of service . While so . he had fell ill and he was on medical leave w.e.f. 24-6-96 . He had also sent leave letter which has been acknowledged by the bank . The bank has not reiected the Petitioner's Leave . The Respondent /Bank has served on the Petitioner a show canse notice dated 17-7-96 asking the Petitioner to give his explanation for participating in the strike. This again proves the contention of the Petitioner that his leave has been sanctioned . The Respondent /Bank without issuing a charge- sheet or conducting an enquiry, dismissed the Petitioner from service hy an order dated 31-10-96 on the ground that since he has been unauthorisedly absent for more than 90 davs . he had voluntarily retired from the bank's service . The Pespordent/Bank relied upon para 17 ( a ) of Bipartite Settle- ment dated 10-4-89 to deny employment to the Petitinner. Such a cause in matters relating to emplovment is held to be illegal and arbitrary . Hence , the termination of the service of the Petitioner relving upon such a clause without issuing chargesheet and conducting enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice . The Petitioner had completed 240 days of continuous service in one calendar vear. The Respondent /Bank cannnt deny him employment without following the mandatory provisions of Section 25F of Industria Disputes Act . 1947. Hence , the order of term nation dated 31-10-96 is void ab initio. The Respondent bas terminated the services of the Petitioner for the alleged absence . The Respondent / Bank has not taken note of sincere and efficient services rendered by Petitioner for 13 years before terminating his service. Even if, the absence for the period alleged to misconduct, the punishment of termination 3889 GI/2002-22 .

311

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11,2003/ पौष 21,1924

from service is harsh and disproportionate to the alleged. misconduct of absence . It is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to interfere in the order of punishment awarded under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with regard to the quantum of punishment . Hence , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award holding that the order of termination dated 31-10-96 is iiiegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice contrary to Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently direct the Respondent Manage ment to reinstate the Petitioner with full back wages , conti nuity of service and all other attendant benefits and with costs .

3. The averments in the Counter Statement filed by the II Party /Managemeent Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. ( here- inafter refers to as Respondent ) are briefly as follows :

The wages and other service conditions of the employees of the Respondent/ Bank in clerical and subordinate cadre who are under the category of workmen under Secction 2( s ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are governed by Awards and Settlements governing the banking industry made under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act from time to time . One such settlement was made on 10-4-89 and it is binding on the Petitioner also . Para 17 (a ) of the Bipartite Settlement dt . 10-4-89 reads as follows:-

"When, an employee absents himself from work for a period of 90 days or more consecutive days , with- out submitting any application for leave or for its extension or without any leave to his credit or beyond the period of leave sanctioned originally / subsequently or when there is satisfactory evi- dence that he has taken up employinenet in India or when the management is reasonably satisfied that he has no intention of joining duties , the management may at any time , thereafter give a notice to the employce at his last known address calling upon him to report for duty within thirty days of the date of notice stating inter - afia , the grounds for coming to the conclusion that the em- ployee has no intention of forming duties and fur- nishing necessary evidence where available . Unless the employee reports for duty within 30 days of the notice, or gives an explanation for his absence within the said period of 30 days satisfying the management that he has not taken up another em- plovment or avocation and that he has no intention of joining duties , the employee will be deemed to have voluntarily retired from bank service on the expiry of the said notice . In the event of the em- plovee submitting a satisfactory reply, he shall be permitted to report for duty thereafter within 30 days from the date of the expiry of the aforesaid notice without prejudice to the bank's right to take any action under the law or rules of service . ' On 7-3-84 the Petitioner was appointed as a sub - staff ou probation for the period of six months and he joined service on 12-3-94 . He was confirmed in service w.e.f. 12-9-94 . He was a chronic absentee and he was habitually absenting from duty without leave . He was issued several memos for his unauthorised prolonged frequent absenteeism . During the period from 1-1-96 to 19-9-96 he had absented for 68 days without leave . He again absented from 24-6-96 and this absence continued beyond 90 days . As such, in terms of para 17 (a ) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 the notice dated 25-9-96 was issued to the Petitioner calling upon him to report for duty within 30 days on receipt of the notice and also offer his explanation for his absence . Though the said notice dated 25-9-96 was served on him on 30-9-96 , the Petitioner neither reported for duty nor sent any reply . On the expiry of the notice period on 30-10-96 th Petitioner was deemed to have voluntarily retired from the bank's service in terms of Para 17 ( a ) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89. Accordingly, by a notice dated 31-10-96 the Respondent informed the Petitioner that he was treated as vountarily left the services of the bank . It was in these circumstances , the Petitioner ceased to be in the employment of the Respondent/ Bank . The cessation of employment would not amount to termination of employment by the Respondent . As such , the Petitioner cannot maintain the dispute under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore , the dispute is not maintainable in law and the. Petitioner cannot be con- sidered for any relief . The Respondent /Bank has not received [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 312 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

from the Petitioner any leave letter dated 24-6-96 seeking medical leave from 24-6-96 . The award staff clerical and subordiante staff of the Respondent / Bank , went on a strike from 15-7-96 to 1-9-96. A stereo typed show cause notice dated 17-7-96 was issued to all the striking workmen of the Respondent/Bank and as a matter of routine, the said notice was also issued to the Petitioner, though the Petitioner was not on strike during that period . The Petitioner was not on strike from 15-7-96 because he was already absenting from duties without leave from 24-6-96 . Therefore , the reference to the Respondent's letter dated 17-7-96 would not advance the case of the Petitioner. Any cessation of employment brought about by operation of clause 17 ( a) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 would not amount to termination of employment by the bank. Therefore, there was no ques- tion of issuing charge sheet and conducting an enquiry . Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to make an award rejecting the claim of the Petitioner.

4. The averments in the Reply Statement filed by the I Party/Workman are briefly as follows : -

filed a petition I.A. No. 56/2001 for production of leave letters said to have been submitted by the Petitioner to Respondent/Bank which have been acknowledged by the bank through the postal acknowledgement cards marked earlier as Ex. W2 series . Prior to the filing of that petition by the Petitioner , the Respondent sent a notice to the counsel for the Petitioner for production of the leave letter and acknow- ledgement of the bank for the same. Subsequently , the Respondent has sent yet another notice to the counsel for Petitioner to produce the postal receipts pertaining to the two acknowledgement cards as well as the copies of the letters . At this stage, the Petitioner had filed this application under I.A. No. 56/2001 calling upon the Respondent to produce leave letters purported to have been sent under acknowledge- ment cards marked as Ex . W2 . In the counter filed by the Respondent / Management , they have stated that no leave letter was received from the Petitioner in respect of his absence from 24-6-96 and the application is lacking in bona fide and it is only an attempt to create a basis for the unfounded allegation made by the Petitioner that he had sent leave application in respect of his absence from 24-6-96 . An order has been passed by this Tribunal by dismissing that petition on merits, holding that from the materials available in this case, it cannot be conclusively concluded that Ex. W2 the two postal acknowledgement cards are the evidence for the Petitioner having sent his two medical leave letters to the Respondent /Management as alleged by him. Subsequently , after it was represeneted to the Tribunal that there was no oral evidence , the matter was posted for the arguments of the counsel on either side . Then after three hearings , as the counsel for the Petitioner has not turned up for advancing his arguments , the learned counsel for the II Party/Management has advanced his arguments and orders were reserved for deciding the dispute on merits, with the available materials on record . Subse- quently, the Petitioner had come forwarded with a petition I.A. No. 44/2002 to reoren that case to let in oral evidence , as the Resocadent/Management counse ! had ne objection for the same, it was allowed and the case was re - opened permitting the I Party /Petitioner to let in oral evidence . The Petitioner has examined himself as WW ! and in the cross examination three more documenets on the side of Respon- dent/Management had been marked as Ex . M7 to 19. Thẹn one witness on the side of the management was, examined as MWI and two more documents have been marked as Ex. M10 and M11 . Then on the representation of the learned counsel for the II Party /Management, the evidence was closed and the case was posted for arguments subsequently at the request of the counsel on either side . Then in the subsequent hearing, the counsel for the I Party/ Workroon filed a memo requesting this Tribunal to refer this matter to Lok Adalat for conci'iation and further course of action . As it was strongly opposed on the side of the Respondent . Manage- ment and the Tribunal having come to the conclusion that there is no prima fecie satisfaction for the Tribunal to conclude that every possibility of the matter heing settled between the parties, if referred to Lok Adalat , has closed the memo and posted the case for arguments of the counsel on either side . On the day , when it was taken un for hearing the arguments of the counsel on either side in this dispute as last charce , as the counsel on either side have not come forward to advance their respective arguments , orders was reserved to decide the matter on merits with the availab'e oral and documentary evidence and records available ca either side with the permission to counsel on either side to file their written aronments if any. within a week Subre cuently the learned conneel for the II Party / Management alore bos filed the written arguments.

6. The Point for my consideration is-

"Whether the action of the management in dismissing Sri E. K. Ravi from service is iustified ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

Point :-

He The Respondent prior to issuing notice dated 25-9-96 had issued a charge sheet dated 10-9-96 alleging that the Peti- tioner had been absenting from 24-6-96 and that the same would amount to misconduct under clause 19.5 ( p ) of the Bimartite Settlement . After issuing the charge sheet dated 16-96, the Respondent did not conduct any enquiry or proceed any further on it. The Respondent chose not to proceed on the charge sheet dated 10-9-96 since there was no ground to substantiate the charges levelled against him because the Petitioner for his absence bad applied for leave and the same was not rejected. Only thereafter , to circumve.a . the enquiry by clear afterthought the Respondent had issued the show cause notice dated 25-9-96 . Thus , the very show cause notice dated 25-9-96 purporting to be issued under para 17 ( a) of Bipartite Sett'ement is without jurisdiction. From 15-7-96 to 1-9-96 all the employees of the bank were striking . Most of the employees did not work during this period . Therefore, treating even the period when most of the em- ployees . were on strike as unauthorised absence is not correct . The Petitioner had sent the leave letter for his absence and the same was not rejected . Hence , the absence cannot be termed as unauthorised . Therefore , the purported action in- voking clause 17 ( a ) of Bipartite Settlement is totally mis- conceived . The Petitioner had availed leave which were at his credit after duly informing the Respondent . The a'legation as if, in the notice dated 25-9-96 , the Petitioner was asked to explain the reasons for his absence is not correct . applied for medical leave due to severe back pain and he was advised to take absolute bed rest . Ouly in this background, he could not send any reply to notice dated 25-9-96. In any event, the Respondent cannot arbitrarily terminate the ser- vices of an employee who had been working without any blemish for more than 12 years . Clause 17 ( a) of Bipartite Settlement re'ied upon to terminate the services of the Peti- tioner is illegal and arbitrary. In fact , such an identical provision had been declared as illegal by Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hence , action taken pursuant to such an illegal clause is non est and uniust . The a'legationas if show cause notice dated 17: 7-96 for illegal strike was sent in a stereo typed manner to all the employees is not correct . Only because the Petitioner's leave was sanctioned. the Resnondent in a mis- taken impression that he had also participated in the strike issued the show cause notice dated 17-7-96 to the Petitioner . As if there is no termination and that the petition under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 is not main- tainable is totally misconceived and vexatious . Anv termina- tion in whatsoever manner done is retrenchment in the eve of law. The Respondent after terminating the services of the Petitioner summari'v and in a most arbitrary fashion is taking such obiections in a most unfair manner. The allega- tion as if the Petitioner had voluntarily retired from service is a pure imagination of the Respondent . Bv no stretch of imagination an emplovee who had validiv anplied for leave and which had not been reiected by the Respondent can be termed as unauthorised absence . While so, the Respondent had terminated the services of the Petitioner without any basis. Hence. it is praved that the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award as prayed for with cost.

The Petitioner /Workman has raised this industrial dispute against the Respondent /Bank management cha'lenging the action of the Respondent/ Bank management in dismissing him from service . It is admitted that the Petitioner was appointed as a sub - staff on 7-3-84 on probation for the period of six months and he joined the services of the bank on 12-3-84 and he was confirmed in service w.e.f. 12-9-84 .

5. When the matter was taken up for enquiry first with the consent of the counsel on either side , documents fi'ed on either side have been marked as Ex . W1 to W6 and M1 to M6 respectively. Subsequently, the I Party/ Petitioner has 313 [ भाग II-खड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्त्र: जनवरी 11, 2003/ पौष 21,1924

the contention of the Petitioner that his leave has been sanctioned. But , as WW1 the Petitioner has not deprised so . It is his evidence that he had taken medical leave from 2-6-96 and for that he sent two leave letters nne on 17-7-96 and the another on 23-7-96 and he sent both the leave letters by registered post. But he has not mentioned so either in Claim Statement or in reply statement . He has also not filed copy of the leave letters alleged to have sent on 17-7-96 and 23-7-96. In the cross examination, he would say that he had sent only leave letters twice and he had mentioned in both the leave letters about his back pain as his ailment and that in the first leave letter he sent on 17-7-96 , he asked for one week medical leave and he don't remember the number of days he asked for as medical leave in his 2nd leave letter. These things , he had not pleaded either in his Claim Statement or in his reply statement . It is his further evidence in cross examination that by a letter dated 22-6-92 , he applied for leave and the xerox copy of the same is Ex.. M8 and along with that letter he had enciosed medical certificate and the xerox copy of the same is Ex . M9 . It is his further evidence in the cross examination, like that he applied for medical leave on several nccasions and during that period , he was residing at Tirutani. It is his further admission in cross examination that he don't remember whether he sent medical leave application by registered post prior to July, 1996 and he don't remember to have sent any other leave applications by registered post and it is his further admission as WW1 that he had not gone for work from 24-6-96 and he first sent his leave letter only on 17-7-96 and he had not sent his leave application in the format of the bank and he has not sent any reply for Ex. W4 the charge memo dated 10-9-96 and Ex . W5 notice dated 25-9-96. In Ex. W4 charge memo itself it is stated that if he fails to submit written statement of defence within seven days from the date of receipt of that letter, the Respondent /Management shall be constrained to take such action as they may deem fit and necessary and under Ex . W5 notice , the Petitioner was called upon to report for duty within 30 days from the date of receipt of that notice and failure to report for duty withir the said period he would be deemed to have voluntarily retired from the bank's service on the expiry of the notice period in terms of para 17 ( a ) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89. So from these admissions of the Petitioner as WW1 . it is clear that he has not complied with the diretcion of the Respondent /Management under Ex . W4 and W5 . So, the Respondent/Management had to pass an order under Ex. W6 that the Petitioner is deemed to have voluntarily retired from bank service in terms of para 17 ( a ) of Bipartite Settle- ment . It cannot he disputed that the Petitioner, as the bank employée under the Respondent/Bank, who was working as subordinate staff category as a workman , is governed by the settlements between the bank employees and the bank management . It is clearly averred in the Counter Statement of the Respondent that the wages and other service conditions of the workmen of the Respondent/Bank are governed by Awards and Settlements governing the banking industry made under provisions of Industria! Disputes Act from time to time and one such settlement was made on 10-4-89 and the said settlement is binding on the Petitioner also . It is not the case of the Petitioner that the said settlement is not binding on him. On the other hand , it is contended in the Claim Statement that the termination of the services of the Petitioner relving upon such a clause in the Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 without issuing charge sheet and conducting an en- quiry is illegal , arbitrary and in violation of princin'es of natural justice and that he is advised to state that such a c'ause in matters relating to employment is held to be illegal and arbitrary. For this contention , there is no accentable evidence has been placed before this Tribunal hy the Peti- tioner . On the other hand , the validity of clause under nera 17(a ) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 cannot be challenged by the Petitioner under this industrial dispute .

7. It is not disputed that the Petitioner was ahsented for duty from 24-6-96 . But he would sav that he sent leave annlication requesting grant of medical leave due to his il health. Though an attempt has been made by Petitioner . while giving oral evidence , to prove that he was absented for duty only after applying for medical leave he has not succeeded in his attemet cinca he has not proved his conten- tion to that effent with accentable lopal evidence. It is his admission that under Ex. M3 notice 25-0-04 which is Ex : Ws he was called upon to report for duty within 30 davs on receint of novice Admitted'y, he has rotont reply nor reported for duty within 30 dave of that notice. την It is the specific contention of the Respondent /Management in their Counter Statement that the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and he was habitually absenting from duty without leave for which he was issued several memns for his un- authorised prolonged frequent absenteeism and that during the period from 1-1-96 to 19-9-96 he had absented for 68 days without leave and again he absented for duty from 24-6-96 and for that a notice dated 25-9-96 was issued to the Petitioner calling upon him to report for duty within 30 days on receipt of the notice and also to offer his explanation for his absence and that the said notice dated 25-9-96 was served on the Petitioner on 30-9-96. It is further contended by the Respondent in their Counter Statement that though the notice dated 25-9-96 was served on the Petitioner on 30-9-96 , he neither reported for duty nor sent any reply. So , on the expiry of the notice period on 30-10-96 , the Petitioner was deemed to have voluntarily retired from the bank's service in terms of para 17 ( a ) of Bipartite Settlement dated 30-4-89 and accordingly , by the notice dated 31-10-96 the Respondent informed the Potitfoner that he was treated as voluntarily left the services of the bank and thus , the Petitinner ceased to be in the employment of the Respondent/ Bank and that cessation of employment would not amount to termination of employment by the Respondent . For this , the Petitioner has filed a reply statement stating that prior to the issuing of notice dated 25-9-96, the Respondent have issued charge sheet dated 10-9-96 alleging that the Petitioner had been absenting from 24-6-96 and the same would amount to mis- conduct under clause 19.5 ( p ) of Bipartite Settlement and that after issuing the charge sheet, the Respondent did not conduct any enquiry or proceed any further on it. It is further contended in the reply statement that since there was no ground to substantiate the charges leveiled in the charge sheet dated 10-9-96 , as the Petitioner had applied for leave for his absence and the same was not rejected by the Respondent and that only to circumvent the enquiry , the Respondent on an afterthought had issued show cause notice dated 25-9-96 purported to have been issued under 17 (a ) of Bipartite Settlement and it is without jurisdiction. Ex. W4 is the charge sheet dated 10-9-96 issued by the Respondent/ Management to the Petitioner , whercin it is alleged that the Petitioner had already been charge sheeted vide charge sheet dated 19-4-96 for his unauthorised absence for the period exceeding 30 days from 4-3-96 and in respect of which en- quiry proceedings were pending before the Enquiry Officer and that he had been again absenting for duty from 24-6-96 onwards without intimation and had not reported for duty till date and his absence for the period exceeding 30 days is a gross misconduct under clause 19.5 ( p ) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-66 and that he was advised to submit written statement of defence within seven days from the date of receint of that letter. Ex . W5 is the letter sent by the Respondent /Management to the Petitioner by registered post with acknowledgement. In that notice , the Petitioner was in- formed that he has been unauthorisedly absenting from duty from 24-6-96 onwards without applying for leave and his period of unauthorised absence exceeded 90 days and he has been called upon to report for duty within 30 days from the date of receipt of that notice and failure to comply with that direction will be deemed to have the Petitioner volun- tarily retired from the bank's service on the expiry of the notice period in terms of para 17 ( a) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 . Ex . W6 is the communication dated 31-10-96 sent by Respondent /Management to Petitioner informing him that as he had not reported for duty till date and the notice period of 30 days has expired on 30-10-96 he was deemed to have voluntarily retired from bank service in terms of para 17 ( a) of Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 . Ex . W1 is the xerox copy of the show cause notice dated 17-7-96 issued by the II Party/ Management Disciplinary Authority to the Petitioner on the subject of participation in illegal strike . It is the evidence of MWI that the staff of the bank were on strike between 15-7-96 to 31-8-96 and Ex . W1 is the letter sent to all the staff irrespective of whether he is on strike or not. It is his further admission in evidence that Ex . W3 is the circular issued by the Respondent /Managementto the striking employees of all the branches which has been cir- culated hy the concerned Branch Managers to all of their staff members in their respective branches. So , from Ex . W1 and W3 , it is seen that those documents have been issued by Respondent/ Managementto all the members of the staff of the Respondent /Bank during the period they have observed strike . By issuing one such notice under Ex . W1 dated 17-7-96 by the Respondent /Management to the Petitioner, it is con- tended on the side of the I Party/Workman that it proves [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 314 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

unauthorised absence. for, duty, of the Petitioner, for more thah . 90 days. contiguously , the Respondent Management has issued an order under. Ex . W6 . treating his absence as volun- tary céssation of service . That being the case, it, does not amount to termination of employment of the . Petitioner by the Respondent Management . So, as there was no termina tion the dispute under section 2A is not maintainable . From the materials, available , in, this case , it can be clearly conclu- ded hat, cessation of employment, was,brought about by the Petitioner himself . The learned counsel for the Responden Management had , advanced an argument that the decisions of . Supreme Court, reported as 2001 I LIJ pg . 174. and 2000 ( 1 ) LLJ pg . 1630 are squarely applicable to the facts of this case. In the case , reported as 2001 I LLJ 174 bet- ween PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND OTHERS Vs. SAKATTAR SINGH , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that, " for the unauthorised absence from duty by a bank employee and his default in not offering explanation for unauthorised; absence from duty nor placed any material to prove that he reported for duty , withiin 30 days of the notice as required in terms of Bipartite Settlement, the action taken by the bank management as per the agreement between the parties cannot said to be an illegal action of the bank management , In, a case reported as 2000 ( 1) LLJ . 1630 between , SYNDICATE BANK AND GENERAL SECRE- TARY SYNDICATE BANK STAFF ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that "the action of the bank management following the clause in the Bipartite Settlement, for the absent of bank employee for a period of 90 or more consecutive days and issuing a notice on him calling upon him to report for duty within 30 days of the notice and on his failure to report for duty, the bank coming to the conclusion that the workman had no intention to join duty and passed an order that he had volun- tarily retired from the services of the bank cannot be held to be incorrect or against the principles of natural justice . " This observation of the Supreme Court in that case is squarely applicable to the facts of this case also . Under such circum- stances, on the basis of the materials available in this case. it can be easily concluded that the action of the Respondent Management in passing an order that the concerned work- man's continued absence to duty animounts to voluntary cessation of work as per the clause of the Bipartite Settlement is correct and justified. Hence, the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief. Thus , the point is answered accordingly .

8. In the result , an. Award is passed holding that the con- cerned workman Sri Ė . K. Ravi is not entitled for any relief. No Cost .

(Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed and typèd by bim, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 11th December , 2002. )

K. KARTHIKEYAN, Presiding Officer .

Witnesses Examined :-

For the I. Party Workman ; WW1 Sri E. K. Ravı .

For the II: Party/Management : MW1 Sri S. Kesavaraman .

Documents Exhibited :--

For the I Party| Workman :

Ex. No. Date

Description

W1 17-7-96-Xerox copy of the show, cause notice issued by Respondent Management to Fetitioner .

W2 17-7-96 and 23-7-96 - Postal acknowledgement cards for having sent letters to Chief Personnel Manager.

W3 10-8-96 Xerox copy of the circular issued by Respondent to all striking employees .

W4 10-9-96-Xerox copy of the charge, sheet issued to Petitioner,

W5 25-9-96- Хегох сopy of the notice . îssüed by Respondent to Petitioner for his unauthorised absence.

under Ex. W5 . It is a fact that he had, absented, for duty from 24-6-96 , Ex. WS . was served on him . He has also not produced the postal receipts for having sent those two leave letters by registered post to the . Respondent/ Manage- ment . He wants to rely upon Ex . W2 postal acknowledge- ment cards as his evidence for having sent his leave appli- cations under registered post which were received by the Respondent Management under those two postal acknowledge- ments . So, from this evidence , it cannot be said that he has proved that for his absence from duty he has already sent leave applications on medical grounds and the same. had been received by Respondent Management under Ex. W2 postal acknowledgements . It is his further admission , in cross examination that he became all right from his illness in November , 1996 and he had not obtained any medical fitness certificate . Though he has stated in cross examina- tion that he sent a reply to Ex . W5 letter dated 25-9-96 he has admitted that he has not stated anywhere that he had replied. to that letter under Ex W5. He has also filed xerox copy of the 2A petition filed by him earlier before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) Chennai for conciliation of the dispute . The xerox copy of the same is Ex. W7 . In that petiton also it was not stated that he had sent two leave letters requesting medical leave for his absence . for duty and has got postal acknowledgements for those two leave letters havinig recei- "ed by the Respondent Management . In that petition also, he has not stated for how long he applied for leave on medical grounds on two occasions . It is the definite evidence. ofMW1 for the charge sheet under Ex, W4 , there was no response from the charged official and since they received no reply to the charge sheet under Ex . W4 and after the 90 days absence for work has crossed ,, they issued Ex . W5 letter to the Petitioner and for that also there was no reply and then they issued letter dated 31-10-96 under Ex . W6 and they have not received any leave application from the Petitioner between 24-6-96 and 31-10-96. Itis his further assertive evidence in the Chief Examination itself that they have not received any letter in respect of Ex . W2 postal acknowledge- ments . Nothiing has been elicited in the cross examination of MWI to discredit his evidence in Chief. MW1 has categorically stated in the cross examination also that the absence of the Petitioner for duty exceeded 90 days , it amounts to cessation of employment under Bipartite Settle- ment and hence , the question of giving him conmpensation does not arise . Though it is the plea of the Petitioner that he applied for medical leave from 24-6-96 he has not stated.. clearly cither in the Claim Statement or in his reply, state- ment or even in his evidence as WW1 as to how many days he had applied for medical, leave and what was the period for which he applied for médical leave . Further there is no plea in the Claim Statement or the reply statement of the Petitioner that he ever repored for duty at any time after he recovered from his illness . There is no reason available with the Petitioner as to why he has not replied for Ex. WS notice which is also Ex . M3 . No acceptable reason has been given by Petitioner what prevented him in giving reply to Ex . W5 notice . So , on the basis of the materials avail- able in this case in the absence of production of copies of leave letters and the postal receipts for the allegedly sent the leave letters by registered post go to show that the con- tention of the Petitioner on this aspect cannot be accepted and if he was really sick from 24-6-96 why he should wait till 17-7-96 to post his leave application has not been ex- plaincd. Further , it is his evidence that in the 2nd leave letter he has asked for leave for indefinite period , it is highly improbable . When he was cautious enough to send those leave leters by registered post, it is strange to note that as to why he has not kept copies for the same or the postal receipts for having sent them by registered post. It is not his plea or evidence that he sent medical certificate also along with those leave applications , he said to have sent on the ground of his ill health . He has also not stated that subsequent to his recovery from his ill health he obtained physical fitness certificate from the competent medical officer and he reported for duty with that certificate . There is no plea to that effect available either in his Claim State- ment or in his Reply Statement . There is no reason for the bank to deny receipt of the leave letter and to take fur- ther action under Ex . W5 and W6 . As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the Respondent Management all these facts available in this case squarely attract the clause under 17 ( a ) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-89 which is admitedly binding on the Petitioner . Applying that clause under 17 (a) of the Bipartite Settement dated 10-4-89 for the .

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

315

भारतका राजपत्र : जनवरी

11, 2003 /पौष 21 , 1924

W6 31-10-96-Хегox copy of the order of termina- tion issued to Petitioner.

For the II Party Management : -

Date

Ex . No.

Description

M1 07-03-84- Xerox copy of the order of appoint- ment issued to the Petitioner .

M2 23-08-84-Xerox copy of the order of confirma- tion issued to Petitioner .

M3 25-9-96-Xerox copy of the notice issued by Respondent to Petitioner .

M4 30-09-96-Xerox eopy of the postal acknowledge- ment card for having sent letter notice by the Res- pondent bank to Petitioner .

M5 31-10-96-Xerox copy of the order of termination issued to Petitioner.

M6 07-11-96--Xerox copy of the postal acknowledge- ment card for having sent letter/ notice by the Respondent to Petitioner .

24-11-87-Xerox copy of the circular issued by Head Office of Respondent bank regarding staff leave rules.

18 22-06-92 --Хегos copy of the letter sent by Peti- tioner to Personnel Manager requesting for medical leave enclosing medical certificate .

8:9 21-06-92- Xerox copy of the medical certificate produced by the Petitioner for the period 2-5-92 to 20-6-92.

110 July , 96-Xerox copy of the attendance register of all the departments of Head Office of Respondent bank .

M11 Nil--Xerox copy of specimen signature book le ! of officers of Respondent Bank .

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2002

का . आ . 158. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी. जी. आई.टी.: 105/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 40012/115 / 96-आई . आर . ( विविध ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, प्रवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th December , 2002 S.O. 158 .--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. CGIT : 105/2002 ) of the Central Govern- ment Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Post and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002 .

[No. L - 40012 115 96 - IR ( DU ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .

3889 GI/ 2002--23 .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR PRESENT :

Shri B. G. Saxena , Presiding Officer . Reference No. CGIT : 105/2002 Post Office . AND Shri SadanandG. Gundge.

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L-40012 11596 - IR ( DU ) dated 12-3-98 on follow- ing schedule.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Sr. Supdt . of Post Offices , Nagpur Mufusal Division , Nagpur- 12, the Asstt . Supdt,of Post Offices , Nortlı Sub . Divn , Bhandara and the Post Master , Bhandara Town , Bhandara in terminating the services of Shri Sadanand Gundge , an EDMC - cum -ED Packer w.e.f. 10-11-95 is legal and justified ? If not , what relief he workman is entitled to ?"

This reference was sentto C.G.I.T. , Jabalpur on 12-3-98 . The file was received in Court at C.G.I.T. , Nagpur by transfer in September , 2002. The notices were issued to both the parties and the case was fix- ed for 4-10-2002 for filing Statement of Claim by the workman . On this date the workman did turn up. The counsel for the management represent . ed that the workman Sadanand Gundge has died . The case was adjourned to 3-12-2002 . not The case was called out today. The representative of the management of Senior Superintendent of Post Office , Nagpur submitted application today i.e. 3-12-2002 that Sadanand G. Gundge has died on 21-9-96 . He also submitted photocopy Death Certificate of Nagar Parishad , Bhandara . of the In this case neither the workman's representative or the union representative submitted any Statement of Claim in the Court of CGIT, Jabalpur in March , 1998 nor any legal heir or the union representative of the workman Sadanand Gundge turned up to con- test the case of the workman in this Court , hence the proceedings are dropped .

ORDER

The workman Sadanand G. Gundge has died on 21-9-96 . Nobody appeared in this Court for the deceased to contest the case , hence the proceedings are dropped .

The reference is decided accordingly . Date : 3-12-2002 .

B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer 316

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2002

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute. vide Order No. L -42012 789-D - II ( B ) IR ( DU ) dated 2nd August . 1989 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 159.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुशरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार तुंगभद्रा बोर्ड के प्रबन्धतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुवन्ध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण बैंगलोर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 54/89 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एन.12012/7/ 89-डी.- II (बी.)/ आई . आर. ( डी.यू.) ] वी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December , 2002

"Whether the action of the Tungabhadra Board , T.B. Dam , Bellary District in retrenching S Shri Mookanna, G. Ravi K. Venkappa Setty, Κ. Vonnappa , V. G. Yerrappa , D. Nagabhushanam , T. Mallikarjuna , Smt . Laxmi , SiShri Eranna , Suryababu , Faki- rappa , M. Rajesekar , Veerashan Ismail . Nallanna , Ramalinga , G. Gangappa and Narasimhulu is justified ? If not to what relief are the workmen entitled to ? "

2. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour referred this dispute by Order No. L - 42012/ 7/ 89 - D- II ( B ) IR (DU ) dated 2nd August , 1989 .

3. Parties appeared and filed Claim and Counter respectively. Staternent S.O. 159.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Ladustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 54/89 ) of the Central Government Indus- trial Tribunal Labour Court Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between.. the employers in relation to the management of Tungabhadra Board and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002.

[ No 1-42012 7 89 - D.11 ( B ) IR ( DU ) ]

B. M. DAVID . Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

4. This Tribunal by its order dated 29th June . 2001 has disposed off this dispute and the reference is rejected. Thereafter the workmen filed Writ Peti- tion No. 37972-988 2001 ( L - TER ) and the matter is remanded by allowing the above Writ Petition

5. After the remand counsels appeared once and thereafter counsels did not appear .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT " SHRAM SADAN " , III MAIN, III CROSS , II PHASE . TUMKUR ROAD , YESHWANT PUR . BANGALORE

Dated 28th November , 2002

PRESENT :

6. The workman after remand has filed affidavit . The affidavits of G. Ravi , T. Mallikarjuna , D. Naga- bhushana , P. Gadinngappa, Madanna , Y. Suribabu , Mahananda , Mookanna, Chandrashekara , D. B. Narasimholu . H. Veeresh , Ismail , Gangappa , Rama- lingappa , and K. Venkappa Shetty are filed.

Hon'ble Shri V. N. Kulkarni , B.Com.LLB . , Presiding Officer , CGIT-Cum- Labour Court, Bangalore .

7. I have considered these affidavit carefully . This is a typed affidavit and columns are filled . It is stated in the affidavit that the workmen have worked for more than 240 days .

C. R. No. 54.89

I PARTY :

S'Shri Mookanna and 21 Others

Firstly the workmen remained absent . Secondly these affidavits are not sufficient to establish that the workmen have worked for more than 240 days . The workmen have miserably failed to prove their case even after remand and they did not attend the court and tendered themselves for cross - examination .

9. In view of these facts I pass the following Order :

The General Secretary Tungabhadra Board Factory Workers and Civil Employees Union , T.B. Dam - 583 225 Bellary District.

ORDER

U PARTY:

The reference is rejected .

1 The Secretary .

(Dietated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 28th November , 2002 ) .

Tungabhadra Board , T.B. Dam- 583 225 Bellary District .

V. N. KULKARNI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2002 2. The Executive Engineer, Low Leve : Canal Division, Cantonment , Bellary-583104

का. आ . 160.--ग्रौद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार फॉरेस्ट रिसर्च इंस्टिट्यूट् एण्ड कोलिजेस [भाग II--खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संस्यः 77/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करता है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42012/61/ 89 आई . ग्रार . ( विविध ) ] बा . एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th December , 2002 S.O. 160. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 77: 2002 ) of the Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal Lbour Cout , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Forest Research Institute and Colleges and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2002 .

[No. L - 4201261| 89 - JR ( DU ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secу .

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT :

Rudresh Kumar , Presiding Officer .

I.D. No. 77 2002 ( DELHI No. 33:90 ) Ref . No. 4201261,89 IR ( DU ) dated 29-3-90

BETWEEN

Pradeep Kumar So Sri Balak Ram , C- 26 , P& T Colony , Chukkhuwala , Dehradun- 248 001 .

AND

The President , Forest Research Institute and Colleges , P.O. New Forest , Dehradun- 248 001 .

AWARD

dated By Order No. L-420126189 IR ( DU) 29-3-90, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , in exercise of powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A ) of Section 10 of the I.D. Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between Pradeep Kumar So Balak Ram , C -26 , P & T Colony , Chukkhuwala , Dehradun and the President , Forest Research Institute and Colleges , P.O. New Forest , Dehradun , for adjudica- tion to the CGIT- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi . Later , vide Order No. Z- 20025-54 2001 - CLS - 11 dated 19-4-2002, this case was transferred to this tribunal for adjudication. 7-20025.54

The reference under adjudication is as under :

317

भारत का राजपत्त्र : जनवरी 11 , 2003 / पीष 21 , 1924

"भया फ़ॉरेस्ट रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट व कालेज, देहरादून के प्रबंधन द्वारा श्री प्रदीप कमार पुत्र श्रो को दिनांक 5-5-86 से सेवा से निष्कासित करना उचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का अधिकारी है ? " बालक राम

2. Admittedly, the workman , Pradeep Kumar , was appointed by the management of Forest Rescarch Institute and Colleges ( FRI ) and worked in its diffe- rent branches w.e.f. 22-8-78 to 5-5-86 . Para 2 of the claim statement provides details of his working period , as below :

22-8-78 to 27-3-79 ( a) Systematic Botany Branch,

1-6-79 to 31-10-79 27-6-80 to 16-10-80

13-4-81 to 9-7-81 (b) Indo -Danish Project

19-4-82 to 30-6-82 7-7-82 to 4-9-82 1-1-83 to 2-7-84

12-2-85 to 14-4-85 (d) Indo- Danish Project

4-10-85 to 4-12-85 (c) Forest Genetic Branch

11-2-86 to 5-5-86 (f) Forest Pathology Branch

3. He was working since 22-8-78 and fulfilled all criterias to be included in the list of casual daily labourers ( CDLs ) drawn in the FRI circulated vide circular No. 3-1-86 - Estt . III dated 27-10-87 , and sub- sequently finalised on 30-10-87. He was even senior most person to those shown at Sl . No. 1 and 2, en- gaged subsequently on 9-3-79 , but was denied in- clusion in the said list . Later , this list was used for absorption and regularisation . It is also alleged that the management of FRI did not follow statutory pro- visions contained in section 25-G and 25- H of the I.D. Act , and also , Rules 77 and 73 of Industrial Dispute (Central ) Rules , 1957. His claim was ignored and new hands were appointed , time and again, from outside . Despite offering of his ser- vices , he was denied continuity in service . He had completed more than 240 days in two years and was ctherwise qualified, but the management adopting un- fair labour practice , terminated his services on 27-3-79 , 31-3-79 , 16-10-81 , 30-6-82, 4-9-82 , 2-7-84, 14-4-85 , 4-12-85 and finally on 5-5-86 to show artificial breaks with a view to deny his claim . The nature of work on which he was working was perennial . The workman claims his absorption and regularisation as per direction of the Supreme Court inW.P. 1357 of 1987 and 886 of 1988 .

4. The management on the other hand , has not disputed engagements of the workman as stated in the statement of claim , however , it has raised a prc- liminary objection that the FRI and Colleges , Dehra- dun, is a research institute and is not an industrial establishment and so , the provision of the 1.D. Act , are not applicable . It further has stated that in res- pect of such workmen who continued on long-term and continuous basis and were on employment as on 31-12-86 , were absorbed as per the decision of the Supreme Court . The Hon'ble Supreme Court had given clear direction that only such continuing work- man or their seniors who continued to be in engage- 318

[PART II-- SEC . 3 ( ⅱ ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003/ PAUSA 21, 1924

It on his own es was required by circular letter No. 3-3-85 - Est , 11 ( il ) dated 12-9-85 , MW- 1 P.M. Manghani , Regisuar of the FRi adantted that there are ne notings that he left the job on his own . appears that the management had a device to give break in service to ensure that no worker could chém absorption . All those who were qualified to be regularised for having worked for more than 240 days as mentioned in the circular , till 31-12-1986 should have been included . The workman qualified as he had worked for about 8 years which included continuous service for more than 240 days in the year 1978-79 and 1983-84 . In case broken period taken into consideration he served for longer period . is

re- ment with the FRI as CDLs, their services sneuld be regularised . The workman had no continuous engagement with the FRI , was not covered by the Supreme Court judgment and so, his claim for gularisation was not in order and ignored . Further- more , the management states that averment of the workman that certain persons were appointed later ofter him and continued in service is not correct . The fact of the matter is that various workers were employed in various types of works in various trades by the branch officers who were given discretion to engage and disengage daily wage labourers depending upon their requirements . The workers obviously could not be kept engaged when there was no re- quirements for them . In that back drop , the princi- ple of 'last come first go' has no relevance . management denies unfair labour practice by giving periodical breaks etc. The

5. Thus , exclusion of the name of the workman in the list of CDLs was not justified . According to Office Memorandums and circulars quoted above , he was entitled to be absorbed and regularised . He was much senior to those who entered into service after 20-3-79.

5. Before adverting to discuss facts and circum- stances to judge merit of claim , it seems expedient to have glance over the policy followed in the Insti- tute by way of Office Memorandum and O.M. No. 49014 4 77 Estt . (C ) dated 21-3-79 circulated vide this office endorsement No. 2279 and O.M. No. 490143 83 - Estt . (C ) dated 5th January , 1984 , circu- lated by FRI by No. 2279- Estt . - III dt . 30-4-84.

roll 9. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Writ Petition 1351 1987 and 886'88 directed FRI and other respondents to absorb the petitioners and all those semers or similarly situated . The workman was soner as well similarly situated . The order of the Supreme Court has no reference that only those 31-12-86 should be absorbed and regularised. The workman should have been ab- sorbed and regularised , but the management inter- preted the order to suit its own convenience , to dep rive, the workman of his legitimate claim. Appoint ment of new hands preference the workman was also unfair labour prac- tice. The plea of the management that different branches were free to appoint casual workers as per need ennot change the status of the workman . The appointment and condition of ser- vices of the CDLs were regulated by Central office orders and not by branches by their own norms , FRI has to be taken as single unit . in to 6. The Office Memorandum dated 21-3-79 referr- ed to AROM. No. 14011 2: 76 - Estt . ( D ) dt . 2-4-6-76 which permitted appointment of casual employees to the post of peons borne on the regular establishment subject to condition of his being engaged through Employment Exchange , and having minimum of two years continuous service as casual labour in the office establishment . This Office Memorandum per- mitted those who worked for 240 days during each of the two years ( including broken period of service) cligible for regularisation. This was further clarified that broken periods of service rendered as casual employce shall be taken into account for purposes of regularisation in regular establishment provided that one stretch of service is for more than six months . This bener was extended to workers engaged af'er 20-3-79 by Office Memorandum dated 5-1-1984. even

10. No materials placed to show that FRI is en- gaged only in research work. It involved in various activities in nature of commercial activities with motive of profit or not . Research products and expertise ete . are charged , hence FRI industry and the provision of I.D. Act , 1947 applicable. is an are

11. Thus, in the totality of the facts and circum- stances , the action of the management in terminating the services of the workman was not justified . The workman is entitled to reinstatement . He must have worked for his subsistence hence is entitled to 50 per cent back wages . He is also entitled to regularisa- tion from the date his junior at Serial No. 1 of list of Casual Daily Labourers was regularised .

12. Award as above . LUCKNOW,

Date : 9-12-2002 .

7. On scrutiny of working periods as given in the para 9 of written statement , the workman had served fo : 279 days from 22-8-78 to 21-8-79 and 370 days from 1-1-83 to 5-1-84 to cover his case for regulari- sation. Ifbroken period is taken into consideration , the care of the workman will be strengthened further . Further , vide Order No. 3-1-86 - Estt , III dt . 27-10-87 , a list of casual daily labourers ( CDLs ) was drawn in respect of those who have been engaged till 31-12-86. The workman had been regularly engag- ed and so , his name should have been included be- fore the workman shown at Sl . No. 1. The plea of the management that those at roll on 31-12-86 were to be enlisted, is factually incorrect . The caption of the letter is not in consonance with the content of the letter . The letter mentions "who have been engag- ed till . 31-12-86 " which does not mean those work- ing on 31-12-86 . The workman was disengaged on 5-5-86 and was not working on 31-12-86 , but was working on the date of, circular which requiredto prepare list of Casual Daily Labourers i.e. in the year 1984. There no evidence to warrant inference of his leaving job on his own . The management did not inform the central office of his leaving the job

RUDRESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer [भाग II-वड 3 ( ii ) ]

319

भारत का राजपत्न : जनवरी 11,2003/पौष 21,1924

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2002

का. आ. 161.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार फॉरेस्ट रिसर्च इंस्टिट्यूट एण्ड कॉलेजेस् के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों ओर उनके कर्मकारों के बांच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट श्रौद्योगिक विदाद में केन्द्रीय मरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42012/62/ 89-आई . आर . ( विविध ) ] वा. एम. डेविड , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th December, 2002

as S.O. 161. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 81 2002 ) of the Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal Labour Court Lucknow now shewn in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Forest Research Institute and Colleges and their workman, which was received by the Central Gov- ernment on 16-12-2002 .

[No. L- 420126289 - IR ( DU ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT , LUCKNOW

PRESENT :

Rudresh Kumar , Presiding Officer . I.D. No. 81/2002 (Delhi No. 3290 ) Ref. No. L -42012 62 89 IR ( DU) dated 256-3-90

BETWEEN

Jagmohan So Sri Balak Rain G -26 , P&T Colony, Chukkhuwala , Dehradun-248001 .

AND

and The President , Forest Research Institute Colleges P.O. New Forest -Dehradun-- 248001.

AWARD

dated By Order No. L -42012 | 62| 89 IR ( DU ) 29-3-90 , the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and section 2(A) of section 10 of the I.D. Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between Jagmohan So Balak Ram G - 26, P & T Colony, Chukkhuwała , Dehradun and the President, Forest Research Institute & Colleges , New Forest , Dehradun , for adjudication to CGIT- cum-Labour Court , New Delhi . Later, vide Order No. Z -20025,54 2001 - CLS - 11 dated 19-4-2002 , this case was transferred to this tribunal for adjudication .

The reference under adjudication is as under "क्या फांरेस्ट रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट व कालेज के प्रबंधन द्वारा श्री जगमोहन सिंह पुत्र श्री बालक राम को दिनांक 25-09-87 से सेवा से निष्कासित करना उचित है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का अधिकारी है ? "

2. it is averred in the statement of claim that Jagmohan Singh , the workman , was appointed subs- tantively on the post of Group ' D ' employee in the Forest Research institute & Colleges , in short FRI , Genetics branch , w.e.f. 11-7-84 . He was designat- ed as casual daily labour ( CDL) and worked follows : as 11-7-84 to 9-8-84 ;

13-8-84 to 11-9-84 ;

4-10-85 to 4-12-85 ;

25-12-85 to 24-1-86;

2-6-86 to 11-2-87;

25-1-86 to 13-3-86 ; and in Genetics branch and from 26-8-87 to 5-9-87 in Economics branch ,

3. His name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange. The managementgement was used to provide artificial breaks with a view to defeat claim of the workers , though the workman and similarly situated other workmen worked uninterruptedly . The action of the management was in clear violation of the statutory provisions contained under sections 25 -G and 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and Central Rules framed there under .

4. Later, the management of FRI prepared a seniority-wise list of CDLs and circulated by letter No. 3-1-86 - Estt , III dated 27-10-87 , which subse- quently was finalised on 30-10-87 . The workman's name was at Sl . No. 236 of the said list . There were many juniors in this list, out of which 137 juniors CDLs are still in the employment under the manage- ment and 70 CDLs belong to the same category whilst65 are were better qualified academically He was made victim of gross discrimination on his , being a Scheduled Caste . His services were terminated giving short term appointment though work always exist- ed . His juniors were retained . The management , during the said period appointed sufficient hands frem out side and did not make any offer to the workman. In fact, the workman remained in con- tinuous employment of the FRI but cessation of work was shown deliberately in malafide manner , so as to deny benefit of Section 25 - B read with Section - 25- F of the J.D. Act, 1947. Even during the period of his broken employment , he had completed 240 days in block of 12 calendar months i.e. 263 days in bet- ween 4-10-85 to 3-10-86 and 285 days from 12-2-86 to 11-2-87 . He was in the Genetic branch till 11-2-87 when his services were terminated . Again , he worked for about 285 days from 25-1-86 24-2-87 . The nature of work taken from him was of perennial nature . He was given artificial breaks to defeat his cause . to [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 320 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 /PAUSA 21 , 1924

of the writ statement it has been submitted that the workman was not a petitioner in the Writ Peti- tious filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court , and so, the decisions did not guide his fate. His case is also not covered under section 25 -G or other provisions of the I.D. Act , 1947 .

5. The workman also complained of less payment , in comparison to regular workers but this issue is beyond the scope of reference which seeks adjudica- tion only on the legality of termination . The work- man further claims regularisation of his services w.e.f. date his counter parts , the next junior to him , was regularised with all consequential bene- fits in view of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court decisions in Writ Petition Nos . 1351 of 1987 and 886 of 1988 .

10. Both parties relied on documentary as weli oral evidence . Jagmohan Singh examined himself as solitary oral evidence and the management also filed affidavit of P.M. Manghani , Registrar , FRI as MW- 1.

6. Thus , the central issue , is , to determine status of the workman , prior to dispensation of his services from the FRI . The direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Couri , in Civil Writ Petition No. 1351 of 1987, Rajesh Kumar Soni Vs. Ministry of Enviror- ment and Ferest and Wild Life and others and in Wait Petition No. 886 of 1988 under article 32 of the Constitution in between Hemant Kumar Gupta and 19 others Vs. Ministry of Environment & Forest and Wild Life and others , including the Director , FRI , Dehradun as respondent No. 2, has also to be considered.

The 11. The preliminary issued raised by the manage- ment , is , that Genetics branch is not an ' industry ' for treating FRI an ' industry' . A particular branch cannot be taken as guide . The activities of the institute as a whole have to be considered . Institute carries systematic activities with organized co-operation between employces and employer . There may not be motive of prent making , but evidence is Jacking that it carries purely research works . Nothing shown that the research products , including intellectual properties are not soid to gov- ernmental or some others. The FRI is an industry' on the test laid down by the Apex Court in the several pronouncements .

7. The management of FRI , in it's written state- ment has denied claim of the workman . A prelimi- nary objection is also raised that the Genetics branch of the FRI , Dehradun , is not an ' industry ' and as such, the claim ennot be adjudicated taking aid of the 1.D. Act, 1947. The plea of the workman , of his having worked for 240 days and his continuance in employment as CDL in 1984, 1985 and 1987 as also denied . It is contended that the workman was not retrenched but he left the job on his own 11-2-87 and so , is not entitled to benefit of section 25-F of the I.D. Act . Also , the provisions of sec- tion 25- H and 25 -G are not applicable in his case . 017

8. The management , however, has admitted case of the workman to the extent that he had been en- gaged as casual daily labour in its Genetics branch from 11-7-84 till 11-2-87 with breaks , and that his name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange from time to time . The workman was used to be engaged for specific work i.e. cleaning of fields and taking of seeds for planting and did not work con- tinuously . He left the job as CDL on 11-2-87 on his own. Later , he joined as CDL in Fores : Econo- mics branch w.e.f. 26-8-87 and continued till 25-9-87. In para 2 of the written stttement , the management has given details of his employment as casual daily labour , which are almost the same shown in state- ment of claim . It is not denied that the name of the workman figured at Serial No. 235 of the seniority- wise list of CDLs , and further ; that juniors are still working . It is significant to note that no justification was given to deny absorption of the workman , compliance to the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Ccurt . No materials have been placed to show that the decisions directions renderedby the Hon'hle Supreme Court was not applicable in the case of the workman. in

the as 12. The management has admitted list of the CDLs , and inclusion of workman's name therein at Sl . No. 236. A copy of the list is filed by the work- man which is not disputed by the inanagement. This list contained 373 names , and is dated 30-10-87 . It is not denied that the workman was a daily wager and his wages were fixed by the President of FR! and Colleges . By letter No. 33'85 - Esit , III ( 11) the Government of India , in FRI and Colleges , New Forest, Dehradun by its order dated 12-9-85 rationa- lised absorption and regularisation of casual daily labourers of the Institute and issued instructions . In the said letter , it is mentioned that the central office will be responsible only to maintain a seniority list ofCDLs for the purposes of their regularisation and when vacancy in group 'D' post available . The branch officer will keep the central citice ( SD.III section ) informed of all the position of new entrance as well as information relation to CDLs whose ser- vices terminated or left the job at their own . The management has pleaded that the workman left the job on his own . However, in compliance of the aforesaid instructions , the Branch Officer did never inform the central office which rebuts plea of the inanagement that the workman left the job on his own. MW- 1 admitted that the workman , left the job on his own , is not recorded in the documents. The case of the management plea stands falsified also , as the workman was engaged later in the Economic branch . Had he left the job on his own , there was no occasion for him to join in other branch . It ap- pears that the management had evolved a device to defeat possible claim of the workman and all such workinen who were being given breaks , despite avail- ability of works . No cvidence is given denying engagement of fresh labourers during the said period, as claimed by the workman which proves availability of works .

13. MW- 1 admitted that official appointment letters were not issued to the workman at the time of join- ing as CDL. nor termination letters was issued 10 9. The management has admitted drawing of a list of all CDLs engaged till 31-12-86 , but has clari- fied that inclusion of name did not confer any right of regularisation in group ' D' post. He was engag- ed in Forest Economics branch for one month i.c. 26-8-87 to 25-9-87 and during this period the list was finalized . His name figured therein but this list is not relevant for his regularisation . In para 7 [भाग 11-खड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 11 , 2003/ पोप 21,1924

Ex- him. Annexures 5 to 15 are not appointment letters but requisition letters from the Employment change . These papers were never shown to the workman at any point of time. Perhapes , these letters was drawn for office records . In view of the statement of the Registrar before this tribunal , non- issuing of appointment letters , the appointments of the workman were not for specified terms . As stated earlier the names of the workman were used to be sponsored by the Employment Exchange . His registration ne , also finds reference in the list of CDLs.

14. The copies of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in two Writ Petitions , viz . Civil W.P. 1351'87 and 886 88 are on record . The extract of direction in W.P. 1351 87 reads :

" It is not disputed that the petitioner have been working the establishment for more than 4-5 years . This gives us the impression that there is regular need for this employ- ment. Though this is the position , peti- tioners are being continuing as daily rates employees . We do not think this should be permitted particularly when the wages of daily rates employees is about 12 of regu- lar employees . We direct the opposite party respondent to absorb the petitioners on regular basis . If there be any other similarly situated employees senior to them they should be given the same bentfit . This should be done within 3 months hence . " they

15. The relevant direction contained in W.P. 886 88 Hemant Kumar Gupta and 19 others Vs. Minis- try of Environment and Forest and Wild Life , is as follow:

the " In this case the Hon'ble Supreme Court re- affirmed above direction and directed that it is stated that the number of vacancies is sufficient to absorb not only the petitioners but also their seniors who have been the beneficiaries of various orders of this court as well as the Tribunal . We direct department to consider the filing up of those vacancies immediately. The peti- tioners who are absorbed as group ' D' posts should be considered as against group ' C' post in strict order of seniority as quickly as possible. "

at 16. From the above directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is evident that the beneficiaries of these orders were not only the petitioners , but all those similarly situated and particularly , those who were senior to them . The name of the workman was at Sl . No. 236. If we go by the list , some of the petitioners were juniors to the workman i.e. H. K. Gupta at Sl . No. 262 , Km . Mukta Chakarborty Sl . No. 245 , Lal Bahadur at 246 Km . Afsan Jaidi 247 , Narender Singh Bisht 248 , Kum , Geeta Punnial 277, Naresh Kumar 278 , Km , Roohi Devi Barthwal 280, B. M. Unyial 290 and Anil Sachdeva 287. These petitioners were juniors but were absorbed and their services regularised as per direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court . The workman was shown senior to these petitioners , so , as per direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court , his services should also have been regularised and he should have been absorbed from

321 the date his next junior was absorbed . The workman's has stated that as many as 137 juniors were absorbed and regularised as per direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court but he was discriminated being a schedule caste . The plea of the management is that the workman was not a petitioner and so, his case was not considered . This statement is not , in con- formity with the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court , which speaks specifically about absorption of the seniors , irrespective of the facts they were not petitioners . The statement of claim clearly speaks that 68 persons junior to him and similarly situated were absorbed . These averments remained undeni- ed.

The 17. Thus , from above discussions , it is clear that the workman was wronged deliberately by action of the inanagement which ignored directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in his case . He had worked for sufficiently long period. He was not retrenched as per law nor punished for any misconduct . contention of the management that he left the job on his own is factually incorrect as discussed above . He is entitled to same treatment , this juniors accorded . Also his tenure is sufficient to cover his case under section 25 - B read with section 25 - F of the I.D. Act, 1947 . were 18. Accordingly , the award is :

(i) that the action of the management in termi- nating services of the workman is void-ab- initio and the workman is entitled to rein- statement;

( ii) that as per the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in W.P. 1351 of 1987 and 886 of 1988 he is entitled to be regularised from the date his next junior in the list of CDLs was absorhed , with all service bene- fits; and

(iii ) that the is also entitled to 50 per cent of back wages from the date of his termina- tion till notification of the award .

19. Award as above .

LUCKNOW

Dated 10-12-2002.

RUDRESH KUMAR , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 18 दिसम्बर , 2002

का . आ. 162:--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बोच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सोजोश्रारटो 101/ 2002) को प्रकाशित करतो है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-12-2002 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-42012/ 95/ 95आई . आर . ( विविध ) ] बो. एभः डेविड, अवर सचिव 322 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 11 , 2003 / PAUSA 21 , 1924

New Delhi , the 18th December , 2002 S.O. 162. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT 101/2002 ) of the Central Gov- einment Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dis- pute between the employers in relation to the mana- gement of Telecom . Deptt . and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-12-2002 .

[No. L - 40012/ 95 95 - IR (DU ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR PRESENT :

Shri B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer. Reference No. CGIT 101/2002 The D.F.O. Telecom . AND Smt . Mandabai N. Kakde . AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Dethi by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1) and Sub - section 2 (A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide Order Ne . L140012 /95 / 95 - IR( DU ) , dated 30-5-96 on following schedule .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Sub-Divisional Officer Telecom . , Nagpur in terminating the services of Smt. Manda- bai a part time Sweeper- cum- Watermanis legal , just and fair ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, New Delhi - 110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054, 2002

[PART II -- SEC . 3 (1 ) 1 In this case the reference was pending befor C.G.I.T. , Jabalpur . Notices were issued to both the parties on 10-9-2002 .

On 1-10-2002 the workman appeared with his counsel but the management representative did not turn up to file Written Statement . The workman Mandabai N. Kakde had submitted Statement of claim at C.G.I.T. , Jabalpur on 22-9-97 . She mentioned in the claim that she was working from 1988 to March , 1992 and was being paid Rs . 22 per month . She was terminated in March , 1992. She claimed re- insttement. The workman did not submit any docu- ment in support of her claim .

The management also did not file any Written Statement though the case was adjourned to 20-11-2002 and 27-11-2002 .

On 20-11-2002 both the parties absented. On 27-11-2002 also neither the workman turned up nor any representative of the management turned up to contest the case .

The workman Mandabai N. Kakde has not sub- unisted any document to show that she was appoint- 2d as sweeper in Telecom Department in the year 1988 No document has been filed to show that she work- ed upto March , 1992 or she received any regular salary from Telecom Department . In view of the above fact there is no evidence on record to support the claim of the workman . The reference is dis- posed of for want of prosecution as both the parties are avoiding appearance and have been absented timemselves .

ORDER

The reference is disposed of for want of prosecu- tion.

Date : 27-11-2002 .

B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer