This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल०-33001/99

सत्यमेव जयते

REGD. NO. D: L. -33001/99 भारत का राजपन्न The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

सं. 14 ]

No. 14]

नई दिल्ली, शनिवार , अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925 NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, APRIL 5, 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3 -उप- खण्ड (ii) PART II Section 3 Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notification Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

मंत्रिमंडल सचिवालय नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1068.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 129 पीसीआरं, 97 दिनांक 10-06-1997 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से कर्नाटक, बंगलौर में सहकारी सोसायटियों के रजिस्ट्रार द्वारा रिपोर्ट सं. बी ओ सं. सीआरडीकेएमसी 38 , 96-97 दिनांक 11-11-1996 के जरिए बंगलौर डिस्ट्रिक्ट और बंगलौर रूरल डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंट्रल कॉपरेटिव बैंक लि. , पीबी सं. 1813 लक्ष्मी सदन, 5वां मेन रोड, चामराजपेट, बंगलौर-18 में बताई गई अनियमितताओं में संलिप्त व्यक्तियों विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 और किसी अन्य विधि के अधीन मामलों एवं उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए उन्हीं तथ्यों से उदभूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के पंजीकरण और अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं. 228/ 20/2003 - डी.एस.पी.ई. ]

शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव 824 GI/2003-1

(2739)

CABINET SECRETARIAT NewDelhi , the 26th March, 2003

S.O. 1068.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5, read with Section 6 ofDelhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946) , the Central Government, with the consent of the State Government of Karnataka vide Notification No. HD 199 PCR, 97 dated 10-6-1997 hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State ofKarnataka for registration and investigation of the cases against those personswho are involved in the irregulanities in Bangalore District and Bangalore Rural District Central Co- operative Bank Ltd. , P.B. No. 1813 , Lakshmi Sadan, 5th MainRoad, Chamarajpet , Bangalore - 18 as pointed out by the Registrar ofCo -operative Societies in Karnataka, Bangalore vide Report No. BO No. CRDKMC 38, 96-97 dated 11-11-96under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and any other law and also attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or inconnection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of same transaction ,arising out of the same facts.

[No. 228/20/2003-DSPE] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy .

2740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

वित्त एवं कम्पनी कार्य मंत्रालय (राजस्वविभाग) केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड

नई दिल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2003

का.आ. 1069.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङके साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 10 (23- छ ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2002-2003 , 2003-2004 और 2004-2005 के लिए नीचे पैरा 3 में उल्लिखित उद्यमों/औद्योगिक उपक्रम को अनुमोदित करती है ।

2. यह अनुमोदन इस शर्त के अधीन है कि: - ( 1 ) उद्यम/औद्योगिक उपक्रम आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 10 ( 23 - छ ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप होगा और उनका अनुपालन करेगा,

( II ) केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि उद्यम :-

(क) अवसंरचनात्मक सुविधा को जारी रखना बंद कर देता है; और

( ख ) खाता बहियों का रख - रखाव नहीं करता है तथा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप नियम ( 7 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित किसी लेखाकार द्वारा ऐसे खातों कीलेखा परीक्षा नहीं कराता है ; अथवा (ग) आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप नियम ( 7 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहींकरता है ।

3. अनुमोदित उद्यम/ औद्योगिक उपक्रम है : - भारत सरकार के दूरसंचार विभाग के साथ मैसर्स भारती टेलिसोनिक लि., एच -5/ 12 , महरौली रोड़, नई दिल्ली-110030 को लाइसेंस करारों संख्या 10-25/2001- बी एस-1 ( 01 ) और 10-07/2002 - बी एस-1 ( आई एल डी-02 ) क्रमशः दिनांक 29-11-2001 और 14-3-2002 के अनुसार भारत में घरेलू लम्बी दूरी की दूरभाष सेवा के लिए उनकी परियोजना और अन्तरराष्ट्रीय लम्बी दूरी की दूरभाष सेवा हेतु । (फा. सं. 205/30/2002- आयकर नि.- II )

[अधिसूचना सं. 52/2003/फा. सं. 205/30/2002- आयकरनि. - 11 ]

संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि. - 11 ) MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND COMPANY AFFAIRS (Department of Revenue) CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES New Delhi , the 13th March , 2003

S.O. 1069. It is notified for general information that enterprise/ industrial undertaking , listed at para ( 3 ) below has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of section 10 (23G) of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ,

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] read with rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 , for the assessment years 2002-2003 , 2003-2004 and 2004-2005.

2. The approval is subject to the condition that :----

(i ) the enterprise/ industrial undertaking will conform to and comply with the provisions of section 10(23G) of the Income- tax Act , 1961 , read with rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962;

(ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval if the enterprise/ industrial undertaking:-

(a) ceases to carry on infrastructure facility ; or (b) fails to maintain books of account and get such accounts audited by an accountant asrequired by sub - rule ( 7) of rule 2E of the Income -taxRules , 1962 ; or

is:- 3. The enterprise /industrial undertaking approved M/s. Bharati Telesonic Ltd. , H - 5/ 12 , Mehrauli Road. New Delhi - 110030 for their project of Domestic Long Distance Telephony Service in India and International Long Distance Telephony Service as per Licence Agrcements bearing numbers 10-25 / 2001 - BS- 1 ( 01 ) and 10-07/2002-BS- I (ILD-02) and dated 29-11-2001 and 14-3-2002 respectively with the Department of Telecommunications , Government of India , (F. No. 205 /30 /2002 - ITA -II ) .

Notification No. 52/2003/F . No. 205/30 /2002 /ITA.II ] SANGEETA GUPTA. Di tor ( ITA.II ) ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिग प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 21 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1070.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970 के खण्ड १ के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) एवं ( 2 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा १ की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा अखिल भारतीय देना बैंक अधिकारी संघ के महासचिव एवं एमएमजी स्केल -11 में प्रबंधक के रूप में तैनात श्री बी.टी. रामचन्द्र रेड्डी को अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से 30- 4-2005 अर्थात्अधिवार्पिता की तिथि तक अथवा देना बैंक के अधिकारी नहीं रहने पर अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, देना बैंक के बोर्ड में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है । यह नामांकन बैंक आफ महाराष्ट्र अधिकारी संघ द्वारा मुम्बई उच्च न्यायालय में दायर वर्ष 2001 की रिट याचिका सं. 5394 के निर्णय के अध्यधीन होगा ।

[फा. सं. 9/ 15/2001- बीओ -1 ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव 2741

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(Department ofEconomic Affairs)

(Banking Division)

New Delhi , the 21st March, 2003

Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central Government on the recommendation of Reserve Bank of India , hereby declares that the provisions of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 15 of the Banking Regulation Act , 1949 shall not apply to the South Indian Bank in so far as treatment of the expenditure related to the Voluntary Retirement Scheme being treated as Deferred Revenue Expenditure , for the financial years 2002-2003 to 2006-2007.

[F. No. 13/3/2003 -BOA]

D. CHOUDHURY, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1072.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में , संलग्न अनुलग्नक में निम्नलिखित बैंकों के सूचीबद्ध कार्यालयों/शाखाओं को, जिनके 80 से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है :-

कार्यालयों/शाखाओं S.O. 1070.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( f) of Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970 , read with sub - clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970 , the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri B.T. Ramachandra Reddy, General Secretary, All India Dena Bank Officers ' Federation and posted as Manager in MMG Scale II as Officer Employee Director on the Board of Dena Bank from the date of notification and upto 30-04-2005 , i.e. upto the date of his superannuation or until he ceases to be an officer ofDena Bank. or until further orders , whichever is earlier . The nomination will be subject to the decision of the Mumbai High Court in writ petition No. 5394 of2001 filed by Bank ofMaharashtra Officers Association .

कीसंख्या

क्रम बैंक का नाम सं.

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर

[F. No. 9/ 15/2001-Β.Ο.Ι . ] RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy..

218

2. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक

28 नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च, 2003

3. बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

4. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

183

5. विजया बैंक

6. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक

7. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर

149

8. सिंडिकेट बैंक

9. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

10. आन्ध्रा बैंक

11. भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक

का. आ. 1071.- भारत सरकार, वित्त एवं कंपनी कार्य मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ( बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) के दिनांक 6 फरवरी , 2003 की अधिसूचना सं. एफ 13 /3/ 2003- बीओ ए के अधिक्रमण में बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 की धारा 15 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध उस सीमा तक द साऊथ इंडियन बैंक पर लागू नहीं होंगे, जहां तक उसका संबंध स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृत्ति योजना से संबंधित व्यय को वित्तीय वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2006-2007 तक के लिए आस्थगित राजस्व व्यय माने जाने से है ।

12. कारपोरेशन बैंक

192

13. इंडियन बैंक

[सं. 13/3/2003- बीओए ] डी. चौधरी, अवर सचिव

14. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

36 New Delhi , the 25th March, 2003

1021

15. ओरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स कुल

[फा. सं. 11016/1/2003

रमेशकाबू अणियेरी, उपनिदेशक ( राजभा S.O. 1071.- In supersession of Goverment of India , Ministry of Finance and Company Affairs , Department of Economic Affairs (Banking Division ) notification number F. 13/3/2003 -BOA dated the 6th February , 2003 , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking 2742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

अनुलग्नक

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर

प्रधान कार्यालय

केपेगौडामार्ग

पी.बी.सं. : 9727

बेंगलूर -560 009 कर्नाटक

भारतीय स्टेट बैंक

मुजफ्फरपुरजिला शाखा का नाम

1. आंचलिक कार्यालय, पोस्ट- रमना, पिन-842002 2. मुजफ्फरपुर शाखा , पिन-842001

3. कृषि विकास शाखा मुजफ्फरपुर, पिन-842001 4. ए. एम. वाई. अहियापुर, पिन-842001

5. कृषि विकास शाखा, सरैया, पिन-843126

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 30. किशनपुर, पिन-848301

31. मंगलगढ, जिला-समस्तीपुर

32. मथुरापुर ए. एम.वाई, पिन-848101

33. मुसरीघरारी , पिन-848101

34. पटोरी, पिन-848504

35. रोसड़ा, पिन-848210

36. समस्तीपुर, पिन-848101

37. समस्तीपुर बाजार, पिन-848101

38. सिंधिया, पिन-848209

39. ताजपुर मोरवा, पिन-848121

40. उजियारपुर, जिला- समस्तीपुर, पिन-848132

41. विद्यापति नगर, जिला- समस्तीपुर

पूर्वी चम्पारणजिला

6. औराई, पिन-843312

7. बेला इन्डस्ट्रीयल स्टेट, पिन -842002

8. बिहार यूनिवर्सिटी कैम्पस, पिन-842002

9. चन्दवारा , पिन-842002

10. क्लब रोड, पिन -842002

11. गोला रोड, पिन -842002

12. जैतपुर, पिन-843123

13. कल्याणी मार्केट, पिन-842001

14. कांटा ( एस.ए.बी. ) पोस्ट-पिरौन्छा

15. कांटी , पिन-843109

16. कांटी थरमल पावर स्टेशन, पिन-843100

17. एम.आई.टी. मुजफ्फरपुर , पिन-842003

18. सुतापट्टी, पिन-842001

19. रूपौली, जिला- मुजफ्फरपुर

20. मिठनपुरा. पिन-842002

समस्तीपुरजिला

21. कृषि विकास शाखा, दलसिंह सराय, पिन-848205 22. कृषि विकास शाखा. हसनपुर रोड, पिन-848205 23. कृषि विकास शाखा, समस्तीपुर, पिन-848101 24. विभूतिपुर, जिला- समस्तीपुर, पिन-848211

25. अंगारघाट, पिन-838212

26. बिथान , भाया हसनपुररोड, जिला- समस्तीपुर 27. कृषि विकास शाखा मथुरापुर, जिला- समस्तीपुर , पिन-848101

28. हसनपुर रोड, पिन-848205

29. कल्याणपुर, जिला- समस्तीपुर

42. कृषि विकास शाखा मोतिहारी, पिन-845401

43. कृषि विकास शाखा, रामगढ़वा

44. अरेराज, पूर्वी चम्पारण

45. बाराचकिया, पिन-845412

46. चिरैया, पिन-845415

47. हरसिधी, पिन-845422

48. कल्याणपुर, जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण

49. केशरिया, पिन-845424

50. मधुबन, पिन-845104

51. मलहि बाजार, पिन-845425

52. मेहसी, पिन-845428

53. पहाड़पुर, जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण

54. पकड़ीदयाल, पिन -845428

55. पताही, पिन-845457

56. पिपरा, पो. दमोदरपुर, जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण

57. रक्सौल, पिन-845305

58. तुरकौलिया, पूर्वी चम्पारण

59. बोकानेकला ( एस.ए.बी. ) भाया पताही, पूर्वी चम्पारण 60. चिन्तामनपुर ( एस.ए.बी. ) पूर्वी चम्पारण

61. दूधियावा सरैया ( एस.ए.बी. ) पूर्वी चम्पारण

62. मोतिहारी, पिन -845401

63. मोतिहारी बाजार, पिन-845401

64. नरकटिया जिला-पूर्वी चम्पारण

65. एकदारी , पोस्ट- चौड़दाना , पिन-845302

66. कटहां ( एस.ए.बी. ) पिन- पूर्वी चम्पारण

67. महुआवा ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

68. पूरनहिया, जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण

2743

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

100. सुतीहार , जिला-सारण

69. रूपहारा ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण 101. ताजपुर, पोस्ट-फुलवरिया

70. सलेमपुर, पूर्वी चम्पारण

71. सपही, पूर्वी चम्पारण

72. सीतलपुर, पिन-845412

73. दरमाहा ( एस.ए.बी. ) पूर्वी चम्पारण

जिला-सिवान

102. कृषि विकास शाखा मैरवा , पिन-841229

103. कृषि विकास शाखा सिवान, पिन -841226

104. गोपालपुर, पोस्ट बाकरगंज, पिन-841286

105. महाराजगंज, पिन-841223

74. निमुईया ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला-पूर्वी चम्पारण 106. मैरवा, पिन -841229

75. सरैया पिपरा ( एस.ए.बी. ) , जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण 107. पावर, जिला- सिवान

76. ढाका, जिला पूर्वी चम्पारण

108. रघुलाथपुर, पिन-841504

77. फुलवरिया औझा ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण 109. सिवान, पिन-841226

78. इब्राहिमपुर ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण 110. सिवान बाजार, पिन-841226

79. बैरियाडीह ( एस.ए.बी. ) , जिला- पूर्वी चम्पारण 111. जीरादेई, पिन -841245

80. श्यामपुर बाजार क्षेत्र , पूर्वी चम्पारण

सारणजिला

81. कृषि विकास शाखा छपरा , पिन-841401 वैशालीजिला

112. कृषि विकास शाखा, हाजीपुर, पिन-844101

113. दभैच ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- वैशाली

114. देसारी , पिन-844504

82. कृषि विकास शाखा, परसा, पिन-841219 115. गौरौल , पिन -844118

83. कृषि विकास शाखा, वरैया

116. हाजीपुर, पिन-844101

84. कृषि बाजार प्रांगण, सरहा

85. अंजनी, पोस्ट- फुलबरिया

117. हरौजी ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- वैशाली

118. लालगंज, पिन -844121

86. आमनौर, पिन-841401

119. महनार, पिन-844101

87. चैनपुर, पोस्ट- मसरक, पिन-841401

120. मालपुर, जिला वैशाली

88. छपरा, पिन-841301

89. छपरा बाजार, पिन-841301

90. एकमा, पिन-841208

91. मढौरा, पिन-841518

92. गोढग्गदपुर, पिन-841223

93. नगरा, पिन-841442

121. सुमेरगंज, पोस्ट सलमेपुर, डुमरिया, पिन -844122 जिला वैशाली

दरभंगाजिला

122. कृषि विकास शाखा, बेनीपुर, पिन-847103

123. बन्धौली ( एस.ए.वी. ) पोस्ट- जाले पिन-847302 124. बेनीपुर, पिन-847103

94. नयागांव , पिन-841217

125. दरभंगा , पिन-846001

126. दरभंगा सिटी, पिन-846304

95. परमानन्दपुर, जिला- सारण

96. राजेन्द्र कालेज कैम्पस , छपरा , पिन-841301 97. सहाजीतपुर, जिला- सारण

127. डी.एम.सी. कैम्पस, पिन -846003

128. घनश्यामपुर, भाया कुरसो नदियामी, पिन-847405 129. हांटी, जिला-दरभंगा

98. शमलीरिया , जिला- सारण

130. कादिराबाद, जिला- दरभंगा

99. शीतलपुर-841221 2744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] गोपाल गंज जिला

131. के. एस.डी.एस.यू. कैम्पस , पिन-846004 132. कमतौल , पोस्ट कमतौल , पिन-847301 133. कुमरौली ( एस.ए.बी. ) पोस्ट-कमतौल, जिला-दरभंगा

134. लहेरियासराय , पिन-846001

135. मनीगाछी , जिला- दरभंगा

136. सहसराम ( एस.ए.बी. ) जिला- दरभंगा 137. सकरी, पिन -847239

138. कृषि बाजार प्रागण , शिवधारा , जिला- दरभंगा 139. सुपौल बाजार , जिला- दरभंगा

मधुवनीजिला

140. कृषि विकास शाखा बासोपट्टी, पिन-847225 141. कृषि विकास शाखा, मधुबनी

165. कृषि विकास शाखा, गोपालगंज, पिन-841428 165. दहीभाव , जिला-गोपालगंज

167. गोपालगंज, पिन-841428

168. हथुआ, पिन-841436

169. कटेया, पिन-841437

170. कोयलनदेव, जिला-गोपालगंज

171. मजीरवांकला, पोस्ट- राधागंज बाजार

172. मीरगंज, पिन-841438

173. सासामुखा, जिला-गोपालगंज

174. सिधवालिया, पिन-841423

175. नरनिया, पिन-841438

पश्चिमी चम्पारण

142. अनरेर, जिला- मधुबनी

143. भगवतीपुर , जिला- जिला मधुबनी

144. जयनगर , पिन-843226

145. झंझारपुर, पिन-847404

146. कलुआही , पिन-847229

147. खजौली, पिन-847228

148. लौकहा , पिन-847421

149. मधुबनी , पिन-847211

150. रहिका, जिला-मधुबनी

151. सकरी बाजार, पोस्ट सकरी , जिला- मधुबनी सीमामढ़ीजिला

152. कृषि विकास शाखा , परिहार

153. कृषि विकास शाखा , सीमामढ़ी, पिन-843301 154. बैरगनिया, पिन-843313

155. बेलखंड, पिन-843516

156. चकौवी, जिला-सीतामढ़ी

157. दोस्तीया, जिला-सीतामढ़ी

158. हरारी दुलारपुर, वाया- सुरसंड, पिन-843337 176. कृषि विकास शाखा, बेविया, पिन-845438

177. कृषि विकास शाखा, रामनगर, पिन-845106

178. कृषि बाजार प्रांगण शिकारपुर, नरकटियागंज

179. कृषि बाजार प्रांगण , टिकुलिया, चनपटिया

180. बगहा, पिन -845101

181. बगहा बाजार, पिन-845101

182. बेतिया, पिन-845438

183. भवाल, पश्चिमी चम्पारण

184. चनपटिया, पिन-845449

185. महिरी ( एस.ए.बी. ) , जिला- पश्चिमी चम्पारण 186. गौनाहा , पिन-845102

187. हरिनगर, पिन-845103

188. लौरिया, पिन-845438

189. मैनाटांड, जिला- पश्चिमी चम्पारण

190. नरकटियागंज, जिला- पश्चिमी चम्पारण

191. पारसपकरी , पोस्ट-चनायबा

192. सहादतपुर ( एस.ए.बी. ), जिला- पश्चिमी चम्पारण भारतीय स्टेट बैंक

159. जगधर, पिन-844324

160. जनकपुर रोड, पिन-843320

161. मधुबन बसाहा, पोस्ट मदुरापुर

162. कृषि बाजार प्रांगण मेहसोल, सीमामढ़ी 163. सीतामढ़ी, पिन-843202

164. सीतामढ़ी बाजार, पिन-843301

193. सिकटा बाजार, पिन -835307

194. टोला मलाही, पोस्ट- बालो रामपुर, पिन-845438 195. बाल्मीकीनगर, पिन -835107

196. मधुबनी, जिला- पश्चिमी चम्पारण

197. फुलवरिया , जिला- पश्चिमी चम्पारण 2745

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारतीय स्टेट बैंक

कारपोरेट केद्र,

मुंबई

राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित कीजाने वाली शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची

आंचलिक कार्यालय

198.

स्टेट बैंक भवन, महात्मा गांधी रोड,

पणजी, गोवा-403 001

कोतवाली बाजार शाखा

199.

कोतवाली बाजार, जिला-कांगड़ा,

धर्मशाला-176 215 ( हिमाचल प्रदेश )

200. मंडी शाखा

मंडी-175 001 , हिमाचल प्रदेश

201. वाणिज्यिक शाखा

23- नजफगढ़ रोड़, नई दिल्ली

प्रशांत विहार शाखा

202.

6/7, टी ब्लॉक, सेंट्रल मार्केट,

प्रशांत विहार, दिल्ली-110 085

203 . होडल शाखा

2675- हसनपुर रोड, होडल, जिला

फरीदाबाद, फरीदाबाद -6

204. राजघाट शाखा

राजघाट पावर हाउस , रिंग रोड, नई

दिल्ली-110 002

205. सेवा शाखा

1 - कान्वेन्ट रोड, देहरादून

वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा

206.

वसंत विहार, देहरादून

207. करौली शाखा

सत्यवती विहार, करौली

वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा

208.

104/4 , मध्यम मार्ग , मानसरोवर,

जयपुर

वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा

209.

वैशाली नगर, जयपुर

चांदपोल शाखा

210 .

उनियारों का रास्ता, चांदपोल बाजार,

जयपुर-1

211. आई.टी.सी. सहारनपुर शाखा

सरदार पटेल मार्ग , सहारनपुर -1

वैयक्तिक बैकिंग शाखा

212.

नोएडा, सी-23 , सैक्टर-26 , नोयडा-1

न्यूशाहगंज शाखा

213.

जिला- आगरा, पिन-282 010

(उत्तर प्रदेश)

डबराई शाखा

214.

कलक्ट्रेट कम्पाउंड, जिला-फिरोजाबाद,

डबरई, उत्तर प्रदेश

कमलानगर शाखा

215.

कमलानगर, आगरा , उत्तर प्रदेश

216. 509 आर्मीबेस वर्कशॉप शाखा

509- आर्मीबेस , आगरा , उत्तर प्रदेश

217. वाणिज्यिक शाखा

वर्धमान ट्रेड सेंटर, नेहरू प्लेस ,

नईदिल्ली -110 019

218. स्टाफ प्रशिक्षण केंद्र

भारतीय स्टेट बैंक

हरविलास मार्ग

सिविल लाइंस

अजमेर 305001 ( राजस्थान )

" ख" क्षेत्र

पुणेशहर क्षेत्र

भुसारी कालोनी, पुंणे शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

प्लाट क्र. 5/1 , सर्वे नं . 94/4

भुसारी कालोनी, पौड रोड ,

कोथरुड, पुणे 411 029 ( महाराष्ट्र)

2. लुल्लानगर पुणे शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

शॉप नं. १ /बी, अलाईड हाईट्स

17/2, लुल्लानगर, कोंढवा खुर्द,

पुणे 411 048 ( महाराष्ट्र )

3. कल्याणीनगर पुणे शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

फ्लोरिना इस्टेट,

16/1 कल्याणीनगर,

पुणे 411 014 ( महाराष्ट्र )

अकोला क्षेत्र

4. शिवाजी कॉलेज अकोला शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

शिवाजी आर्ट्स, कॉमर्स, सायन्स कॉलेज , अकोला-444001 ( महाराष्ट्र) 2746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

रत्नागिरी क्षेत्र

5. कुवरबाव शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र 516 , मातृछाया , कुवरबाव, जि. रत्नागिरी 415 639 ( महराष्ट्र) 6. वाटद खंडाला शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र पवार भवन,

वाटद खंडाला 415 613 ( रत्नागिरी ) ( महाराष्ट्र) ठाणे क्षेत्र

7. ठाणे महानगरपालिका शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र ठाणे महानगर पालिका बिल्डिग तल मंजिल, पंचपाखडी, ठाणे 400 602 ( महाराष्ट्र)

8. भायंदर शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र ओंकार टावर्स, प्रथम तल, बी.पी. रोड, भायंदर ( पूर्व ) जि. ठाणे 401 105 ( महाराष्ट्र)

जलगांव क्षेत्र

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] कांगडा मित्र मंडल सहकारी सोसायटी लि.

231 , डॉ.ए.बी. रोड, वरली

मुंबई 400 025 ( महाराष्ट्र)

औरंगाबाद क्षेत्र

14. सेवा शाखा, औरंगाबाद

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

5655 , अंजली काम्प्लेक्स, प्रथम मंजिल खडकेश्वर औरंगाबाद 431 001 ( महाराष्ट्र)

15. जवाहरलाल नेहरू इंजी. कॉलेज औरंगाबाद शाखा बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

एमएएम कैंपस,. नं. 5 सिडको औरंगाबाद 431 003 ( महाराष्ट्र)

लातूर क्षेत्र

16. सराफा होली शाखा बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

मकान क्र. 4-1-292 , अहेर बिल्डिंग

रेणुका माता मंदिर के सामने सराफा होली, एम. जी रोड, नांदेड 431 602 ( महाराष्ट्र)

अहमदनगर क्षेत्र

9 . गणपतिनगर शाखा जलगांव

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

शामा काम्प्लेक्स, शामलाल मिलवाणी मार्ग गणपतिनगर, जलगांव 425 002 ( महाराष्ट्र) कोल्हापुरक्षेत्र

10. ताराराणी विद्यापीठ कोल्हापुर शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

17. दशमेशनगर श्रीरामपुर शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र बिस्मिल्ला मंजिल, धर्मवीर चौक सीडी जैन कॉलेज रोड, दशमेशनगर श्रीरामपुर 413 709 ( महाराष्ट्र)

सोलापुर क्षेत्र

प्रथम गली, राजारामपुरी, ई वार्ड, कोल्हापुर 416 008 ( महाराष्ट्र)

मुंबई उपनगर क्षेत्र

18 . सिविल अस्पताल सोलापुर शाखा बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र सिविल अस्पताल कंपाउंड, सोलापुर 413 003 (महाराष्ट्र)

अहमदाबाद क्षेत्र

11. ओशिवारा मुंबई शाखा बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र मैसर्स ओवेराय चैबर्स. ऑफ न्यूलिंक रोड, ओशिवारा , अंधेरी ( प) मुंबई 400 053 ( महाराष्ट्र)

12. कन्नगवारग्राम मुंबई शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र विकास हाईस्कूल, कन्नमवारग्राम, विक्रोली ( पूर्व ) मुंबई 400 083 (महाराष्ट्र)

मुंबई शहर क्षेत्र

13. वैयक्तिक बैकिंग शाखा, मुंबई

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

19. जूनागढ़ शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र प्रथम मंजिल, गिफ्ट पैलेस अपार्टमेंट, राणावाव चौक, जूनागढ 362 001 ( गुजरात )

दिल्ली क्षेत्र

20. पटियाला शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

6, लीला भवन मार्केट, पटियाला 137 001 ( पंजाब ) 2747

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

बैंकऑफ महाराष्ट्र

(के. का. लोकमंगल, 1501 , शिवाजीनगर, पुणे 411 005 ) " क" क्षेत्र

दिल्लीक्षेत्र

21. हिसार शाखा बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र 196 , ग्रीन स्क्वेअर मार्केट हिसार 120 001 ( हरियाणा )

22. नोएडा शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र ए 307, सेक्टर-19 नोएडा 201 301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश )

23. अजमेरशाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र 12, राम भरोसे भवन, जीपीओ के सामने, पृथ्वीराज मार्ग अजमेर 305 001 ( राजस्थान )

24. शिमला शाखा

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

भारद्वाज निवास, कम्यूनिटी सेंटर के सामने, सेक्टर 11 , लेन -1 शिमला 171 009 ( हिमाचल प्रदेश ) इंदौर क्षेत्र

स्कीम 54 विजयनगर शाखा

25.

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र

51 , विजयनगर स्कीम नं. 54 आगरा - मुंबई महामार्ग इंदौर 452 008 ( मध्य प्रदेश )

भोपाल क्षेत्र

26. अरेरा कालोनी शाखा बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र ई-2/17 , अरेरा काम्प्लेक्स, हबीबगज रेलवे स्टेशन भोपाल 462 016 ( मध्य प्रदेश )

27. सिटी सेंटर शाखा, ग्वालियर

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र बी-11 , पटेल नगर, सिटी सेंटर, ग्वालियर 474 011 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) कोलकाता क्षेत्र

रांचीशाखा

28.

बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र दुकान नं. 115/ 116एं, रांची क्लब कॉम्प्लेक्स मैन रोड, रांची 834 001 ( बिहार ) 824 G1 /03-2

यूनियन बैंकऑफ इंडिया

राजभाषा विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , मुंबई राजभाषा नियम 10 ( 4 ) में अधिसूचना संस्तुत शाखाएं/

कार्यालय

शाखा का नाम

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय

एवं पता

का नाम

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, भुवनेश्वर

1. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया बालेश्वर शाखा विवेकानंद मार्ग बालेश्वर -756 001 उड़ीसा

2. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया पंचुगोछियाशाखा मु. पंचुगोछिया पोस्ट- मुगुपुर वाया-फकीरपुर जिला-क्योंढर-754 142 उड़ीसा

3. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

तालपदर शाखा पोस्ट- तालपदर वाया घेस जिला- बरगड़-768034 उड़ीसा

1. चामराजनगर, मैसूर ( 1043 )

विज़या बैंक पो.बॉ.सं. 1 गिरीश कॉम्पलेक्स अग्रहारास्ट्रीट चामराजनगर मैसूर जिला-571 313

2. हासन ( 1079 )

विजया बैंक पो.बॉ.सं. 46 रोमन कैथोलिक चर्च कंपाउंड होलेनरसीपुर रोड हासन-573 201

3. हुग्णसूर ( 1091 )

विजया बैंक

बहूसार निलया कमरा सं . 1463 एस जे रोड, हुणसूर मैसूर जिला-571 105 2748

4. इंडस्ट्रियल सबर्ब मैसूर ( 1092) विजया बैंक

55 /ए, । स्टेज इंडस्ट्रियल सवर्ब विश्वेश्वर नगर मैसूर-560008

5. कोल्लेगाल ( 1123)

विजया बैंक

पो. बॉ. सं. 11

1/324- एच, पीस पार्क रोड कोल्लेगाल मैसूर जिला-571 440

6. के आर पेट ( 1128 )

विजया बैंक

अरुणा कॉम्पलेक्स मेन रोड, कृष्णराजपेट मंड्या जिला-571 426

7. महूर ( 1134)

विजया बैंक

पोस्ट बॉ.सं. 6 होटल गजानन बिल्डिग प्रथम तल, मेन रोड महूर मंड्या जिला-571 428

8 . मलवल्ली ( 1138 )

विजयाबैंक

पो. बॉ.सं. 10 मैसूर रोड मलवल्ली

मंड्या जिला-571 430

9 . मंड्या ( 1141)

विजया बैंक

पो.बॉ. सं . 18

1119, एस सी रोड

मंड्या-571 401

10. मंडीमोहल्ला, मैसूर ( 1142) विजया बैंक

शालीमार हाउस

मंडी मोहल्ला, तिलकनगर मैसूर -570015

11. नंजनगूड ( 1158)

विजया बैंक पो.बॉ.सं. 8 कमरा सं . 1140/1173 बाजारस्ट्रीट नंजनगूड

मैसूर जिला-571 301

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

12. संतेमेट, मैसूर ( 1191)

विजया बैंक

पो.बॉ. सं. 31

देवराज अर्स रोड

संतपेट, मैसूर -570 001

13. एन एस पुरम, मैसूर ( 1296 )

विजया बैंक

756, न्यूकांतराज अर्स रोड

कुवेपु नगर

मैसूर-570 009

14. गोकुलम एक्सटेंशन मैसूर ( 1314 )

विजया बैंक

415, कांटोररोड गोकुलम, 3 स्टेज मैसूर-570002

15. सैय्याजीराव रोड मैसूर ( 1334 )

विजया बैंक

होटल श्रीराम बिल्डिग सैय्याजीराव रोड

मैसूर-570 021

16. रवींद्रनगर ( 1339 )

विजया बैंक

पो. बॉ. सं. 60

श्री आदी चुंचनगिरि कमर्शियल

बिल्डिंग

रवींद्रनगर

हासन-573 201

17. गुंड्लुपेट ( 1344)

विजया बैंक

ओल्ड अस्पताल रोड

गुंडलपेट

मैसूर जिला-571 111

18 . कृष्णराजनगर ( 1345)

विजया बैंक

4-8, 7 क्रॉस

कृष्णराजनगर

मैसूर जिला-571 602

19. नज़रबाद ( 1354)

विजया बैंक

73, प्रथम तल

माधवेशा शॉपिंग कॉम्पलेक्स

नज़रबाद मेन रोड

मैसूर-570010 2749

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ] .

20. मूडा( 1385)

विजया बैंक

मैसूर शहरीय विकास प्राधिकरण (मूडा) जे एल बी रोड मैसूर-570 005

21. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , मैसूर ( 9115) विजया बैंक क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय 1, शालिवाहना रोड अर्स बोर्डिंग स्कूल के सामने नज़रबाद

मैसूर-570 010

22. प्रभागीय लेखा कार्यालय , मैसूर ( 9210) विजया बैंक 45, डी. देवराज अर्स रोड के. आर. सर्कल के पास संतेपेट

मैसूर-570001

23. करेंसी चस्ट, मैसूर ( 9612) विजया बैंक करेंसी चेस्ट सं. 568 , न्यूकातराज अर्स रोड कुवेंपु नगर

मैसूर -570 023

24. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , कोची (9127 ) विजया बैंक प्रथम तल, जोस अनेक्स जोस जंक्शन, एम. जी. रोड कोची

एर्नाकुलम -682016

आडुगोडी ( 1001 )

25.

विजया बैंक 29, होसूर मेन रोड पो. बॉ. सं . 8227 आडुगोडी बेंगलूर-560 030

बनशंकरी ( 1020 )

26.

विजया बैंक

39011 , 40क्रॉस बनशंकरी 8 ब्लॉक, जयनगर बेंगलूर-560 082

ब्रिगेड रोड ( 1038 )

27.

विजया बैंक प्रथम तल, नीलगिरी बिल्डिंग ब्रिगेड रोड बेंगलूर-560 001

28. ब्याटरायनपुरा ( 1040)

कृषि ऋण को- ऑपरेटिव सोसाईटी बिल्डिंग , बेंगलूर - बेल्लारी रोड, ब्याटरायनपुर,

बेंगलूर-560 092

29. चेन्नपट्टणा ( 1044)

विजया बैंक

छाया मार्केट एम. जी. रोड चेन्नपट्टणा

बेंगलूर जिला-571 501

30. दाबसपेट ( 1049 ) विजया बैंक दाबसपेट नेलमंगला तालुक

बेंगलूर जिला- 562 111

31. दासरहल्ली ( 1054)

विजया बैंक उप्पल टावर्स तुमकूर रोड दासरहल्ली

बेंगलूर-560 057

32. दोड्डबल्लापुर ( 1060 )

विजया बैंक

प्रथम तल ' लक्ष्मी कॉम्पलेक्स ' मेन रोड दौड्डबल्लापुर

बेंगलूर जिला-561 203

दोमलूर ( 1061 )

33.

विजया बैंक

301,7 क्रॉस , दोमलूर ले आडट

बेंगलूर-560 071

गंगानगर ( 1065 )

34.

विजया बैंक

19/10 , प्रथम मेन रोड गंगानगर ले आउट बेंगलूर-560 032

संजय नगर ( 1066)

35.

विजया बैंक

राजमहल विलास एक्सटेंशन 11 स्टेज, संजय नगर

बेंगलूर -560 04 2750

36. हनुमंत नगर (1076) विजया बैंक

'अलोका' 25, 3 मेनरोड हनुमंत नगर बेंगलूर -560 019

37. इंफेंट्री रोड ( 1093 ) विजया बैंक 23/24, इंफेंट्री रोड बेंगलूर-560 001

38. जय नगर ( 1096 )

विजया बैंक पो.बा.सं. 1124 18, 11 मेन , 27 क्रास 3 ब्लॉक ( पूर्व ) , जय नगर बेंगलूर-560 011

39. कॉक्स टाउन ( 1097) विजया बैंक 35 , प्रथम तल तम्बूचेट्टी रोड कॉक्स टाउन बेंगलूर-560 005

40. जे.सी. रोड ( 1100) विजया बैंक पो.बा.सं. 6697 14, जे.सी. रोड बेंगलूर-560 002

41. कनकपुरा ( 1107) विजया बैंक 11/10 , आर ई एस कॉम्पलेक्स प्रथम तल , एम जी रोड. कनकपुरा बेंगलूर-562 117

42. के.जी. रोड ( 1118)

विजया बैंक पो.बा.सं. 9934 , 34 प्रथम तल, हरि राम कॉम्प्लेक्स, के.जी. रोड, बेंगलूर -560 009

43. कोलार ( 1121 ) विजया बैंक पो.बॉ. सं. 19, एम बी रोड पल्लवी टाकीज़ के पास कोलार -563 101

44. मागडी ( 1135 ) विजया बैंक 735/663 व 842/1147 रामराजा अर्स रोड मागडी बेंगलूर ग्रामीण जिला-562 120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 45. मल्लेश्वरम ( 1139 ) विजया बैंक पो.बा. सं . 310 352, संपिगे रोड, बेंगलूर -560 003

4. 46. मेयो हॉल ( 1146 ) विजया बैंक पो.बा. सं. 5118 पब्लिक यूटिलिटी बिल्डिग मेयो हॉल, एम.जी. रोड बेंगलूर-560 001

47. मैसूर रोड ( 1153 ) विजया बैंक सं. 153, II मेन 7 क्रॉस, चामराजपेट बेंगलूर-560 018

48. नागप्पा ब्लॉक ( 1155 ) विजया बैंक 1613 , के बी जी एक्सटेंशन नागप्पाब्लॉक, श्रीरामपुरम बेंगलूर -560 021

49. नरसापुर ( 1159) विजया बैंक नरसापुर कोलार जिला-563 133

50. नेलमंगला ( 1161 ) विजया बैंक " द्वारका प्लाज़ा " 124, बी एच रोड नेलमंगला बेंगलूर -562 123

51. पीण्या ( 1173 )

विजया बैंक

3/1, ए, श्री मुनेश्वर एस्टेट

तुमकूर रोड पीण्या

बेंगलूर -560 058

52. आर. सी. रोड ( 1178 ) विजया बैंक

पो. बा. सं. 5099 भारतीय विद्या भवन बिल्डिंग रेस कोर्स रोड बेंगलूर-560 001 2751

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

53. राजाजी नगर ( 1179 ) विजया बैंक पो.बा. सं. 1022 367 , V ब्लॉक क्रॉस राजाजी नगर बेंगलूर -560 010

54. रामनगरम ( 1180 )

विजया बैंक पो.बॉ. सं . 12 कोर्ट रोड, एम जी रोड रामनगरम बेंगलूर जिला-571 511

55. रेसिडेंसी रोड ( 1184 ) विजया बैंक पो.बॉ. सं. 2555 2- ए, रेसिडेंसी रोड बेंगलूर -560 025

56. सैंकी रोड ( 1189)

विजया बैंक 19, सैंकी रोड बेंगलूर-560 020

57. शंतिनगर ( 1193 )

विजया बैंक पो.बॉ. सं . 2 29 , के.एच. रोड, शंतिनगर बेंगलूर-560 027

58. वेस्ट ऑफ कॉर्ड रोड ( 1201 ) विजया बैंक

12, 1 मेन रोड, II स्टेज, वेस्ट ऑफ कॉर्ड रोड, महालक्ष्मीपुरम बेंगलूर -560 086

59 . साउथ एंड रोड ( 1202 )

विजया बैंक साउथ एंड रोड बसवनगुडी बेंगलूर -560 004

तुमकूर ( 1209 )

60.

विजया बैंक बीएच रोड तुमकूर-572101

अलसूर ( 1216)

61.

विजया बैंक 151/2 , औल्ड मद्रास रोड अलसूर बेंगलूर-560 008

वाणि विलास रोड ( 1217 )

62 .

विजया बैंक पो.बॉ. सं. 431 सं. 2 , वाणि विलास रोड बसबनगुडी बेंगलूर -560 004

63. विद्यानगर ( 1218 )

विजया बैंक विद्यानगर बेंगलूर उत्तर तालुक बेंगलूर, जिला-562157

64. विजय नगर ( 1220 ) विजया बैंक 1019 -ए III मेन रोड विजय नगर बेंगलूर -560 040

65. यशवंतपुर (1228 ) विजया बैंक सुबेदारपाल्यम रोड यशवंतपुर बेंगलूर-560 022

66. देवरायसमुद्र ( 1233) विजया बैंक देवरायसमुद्र मुलबागिल तालुक कोलार जिला-563 127

67. बन्नेरघट्टा ( 1245)

विजया बैंक बन्नेरघट्टा बेंगलूर-560 083

68 . सिटि मार्केट ( 1248 ) विजया बैंक पो.बा. सं. 6692 72, गुंडोपंत स्ट्रीट बेंगलूर -560 002

69. वेंकटपुर ( 1260 ) विजया बैंक

वूल वीवर को- ऑपरेटीव सोसाइटी बिल्डिंग हिन्दूपूर रोड, वेंकटपुर पावगडा तालुक तुमकूर जिला- 561 216

70. गांधी बाज़ार (1261 ) विजयां बैंक

पो.बा. सं . 433 106, गांधी बाज़ार मेन रोड बसवनगुडी बेंगलूर -560 004 2752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

71. हलेवूर ( 1267) विजया बैंक अमृतूर मेन रोड हुलियूरदुर्गा हलेबूर कुणिगल तालुक तुमकूर जिला-572 123

72. चिक्कबल्लारपुर ( 1276) विजया बैंक पो.बॉ. सं. 12 बाजार रोड, चिक्कबल्लापुर कोलार जिला-562 101

73. तेकल ( 1279) विजया बैंक रेलवे स्टेशन के पास तेकल, मालूर तालुक कोलार जिला-563 137

74. एन आर गेड़ ( 1285) 1, [ ] [ नाज काम्प्लेक्स नरमिम्हराज रोड चेंगलूर-560 002

75. पैलेस ऑचंड्स ( 1286 ) विजया बैंक 344/8, अप्पर पैलस ऑरर्ड्स बेंगलूर 560 080

76. मिदृगंगा मठ ( 1289 ) विजया बैंक रेलवे गेट मेन रोड के पास सिद्दगंगा मठ नूनकर जिला-572 104

77. वाइटफील्ड ( 1292 ) विजया बैंक 105, मेन रोड वाइटफील्ड बेंगलूर-560066

78. निरुर्माण ( 1295 ) विजया बैंक बस स्टैंड के पास तिरुर्माण पात्रगड़ा तालुक तुमकुर जिला-572 172

79 इंदिरानगर ( 1301 )

विजया बैंक 325, चिन्मया मिशन हॉस्पीटल रोड इंदिरानगर बेंगलूर - 560038

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ) 80. सारकी ( 1304 ) विजया बैंक 147, 4क्रॉस शिवबालयोगी आश्रम के पास जे.पी. नगर (सारक्की ) III स्टेज बेंगलूर-560 078

81. गुंजूर ( 1305) विजया बैंक

गुजूर वर्तुर द्वारा बेंगलूर दक्षिण तालुक बेंगलूर जिला-560087

82. तिपटूर ( 1324) विजया बैंक जयदेव कॉम्प्लेक्स प्रथम तल रेलवे स्टेशन रोड तिपटूर तुमकूर जिला-572 201

83. कृष्णराजपुरम (1326) विजया बैंक ओल्ड मद्रास रोड कृष्णराजपुरम बेंगलूर -560 036

84. ट्रिनिटी सर्कल ( 1331 ) विजया बैंक 41/2, एम.जी. रोड ट्रिनिटी सर्कल बेंगलूर-560 001

85. चिकपेट( 1332) विजया बैंक रजत कॉम्प्लेक्स II तल, ओ.टी.सी. रोड चिकपेट बेंगलूर-560 053

86 . मूडलुपाल्या ( 1333 ) विजया बैंक प्रदीप कांप्लेक्स 42, नागरभावी रोड मूडलुपाल्या बेंगलूर-560 072 2753

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

87 . जालहल्ली ( 1337)

विजया बैंक जयशंकर विलास एम ई एस रोड जालहल्ली

बेंगलूर -560 013

88. मधुगिरि ( 1341 )

विजया बैंक

502 , बस स्टैण्ड के पास मधुगिरि तुमकूर जिला -572 132

89. गौरीबिदनूर ( 1342)

विजया बैंक

इस्तूरी कॉम्पलेक्स रेलवे स्टेशन रोड, गौरीबिदनूर

कोलार जिला-561 208

१०. एच ए एल III स्टेज ( 1348 ) विजया बैंक

424, न्यूतिप्पसंद्रा रोड एच ए एल III स्टेज

बेंगलूर-560 008

91. उज्जानी ( 1352)

विजया बैंक

कार स्ट्रीट, उज्जानी

हुलियूरदुर्गा होबली, कुणिगल तालुक तुमकूर जिला-752 123

92. बुगुडनहल्ली ( 1355)

विजया बैंक

बुगुडनहल्ली तुमकूर तालुक तुमकूर जिला-572 102

93. गोणी तुमकूर ( 1356)

विजया बैंक

गोणी तुमकूर तुरुवेकेरे तालुक तुमकूर जिला-572 227

होसूर ( 1359 )

94.

विजया बैंक

होसूर शनिवारा संते द्वारा येसलूर होब्ली, सकलेशपुर तालुक हासन जिला-571 235

95. तिरुमले ( 1360 )

विजया बैंक

बेंगलूर -56 5, टेंपल रोड तिरुमले, मागडी तालुक

बेंगलूर ग्रामीण जिला -563 230

96. मुद्देनहल्ली ( 1367 )

विजया बैंक मुद्देनहल्ली चिकबल्लापुर तालुक कोलार जिला-562 101

97. चिक्ककुंतूर ( 1371 ) विजया बैंक

चिक्ककुंतूर मालूर तालुक कोलार जिला-563 130

98. यलहंका ( 1380 )

विजया बैंक

प्रथम तल, के.एच.बी. शॉपिंग कॉम्प्लेक्स 3 , मेन रोड न्यू टाउनशिप , यलहंका बेंगलूर -560 064

99 . होसकोटे ( 1384)

विजया बैंक

साइट सं. 2241

जे सी सर्कल , होसकोटे बेंगलूर ग्रामीण जिला-562 114

100. आस्ति वसूली प्रबंध शाखा ( 1387 ) विजया बैंक

2- ए, रेसिडेंसी रोड बेंगलूर -560 025

विक्टोरिया रोड ( 1388 )

101.

विजया बैंक 25 , विक्टोरिया रोड बेंगलूर-560 047

पूंजी बाजार सेवा शाखा ( 1389 )

102.

विजया बैंक 35, के.जी. रोड बेंगलूर-560 009 2754

103. लघु उद्योग ( 1392 ) विजया बैंक

2- ए, रेसिडेंसी रोड

बेंगलूर-560 025

104. कोरमंगला ( 1394)

विजया बैंक

24 , 1 तल, V क्रास 5 ब्लॉक , कोरमंगला

बेंगलूर-560 095

105. कापेरिट बैकिंग शाखा ( 1398 ) विजया बैंक

एम -2 , 41/2 , एम.जी. रोड ट्रिनिटी सर्कल

बेंगलूर -560 001

106. एच बी आर लेआउट ( 1440 ) विजया बैंक

805, 11 क्रास

एच बी आर लेआउट । ब्लॉक, कल्याण नगर

बेंगलूर-560 043

107. प्रभागीय लेखा कार्यालय ( 9201 ) विजया बैंक

34, हरीराम कॉम्पलेक्स के जी रोड

बेंगलूर -560 009

108. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ( 9124) विजया बैंक

श्रुताकॉम्पलेक्स

19, प्रिमरोज़ रोड

एम.जी. रोड के पास

बेंगलूर-560 025

समुद्रपारीय शाखा , बेंगलूर ( 1401 ) 109.

विजया बैंक

श्रुताकॉम्पलेक्स

19 , प्रिमरोज़ रोड

एम.जी. रोड के पास

बेंगलूर-560 025

110. मुद्रा पेटिका (9601)

विजया बैंक

मुद्रा पेटिका

ट्रिनिटी सर्कल, 41/2 , एम.जी. रोड बेंगलूर -560 001

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] विजया बैंक

प्रधान कार्यालय, बेंगलूर

'ग' क्षेत्र

111. अरंतोडु-1254

मंगलूर - मडिकेरी रोड

अरंतोड, सुल्या ताल्लुक द. क. कर्नाटक

पिन कोड 574239

112. आर्डी -1007

सोमेश्वर - कोटेश्वर रोड

आर्डी, कुंदापुर ताल्लुक

उडुपि जिला

कर्नाटक पिनकोड-576212

113. अकुंठा 1269

परंगीपेट, बंटवाल ताल्लुक कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574143

114. अवाडी- 1011

मेइन रोड

आश्राडी, उड्डुपि जिला

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-576123

115. बी. सी. रोड-1012

मार्डन टाइल्स के सामने

पास्ट- जोडुमार्गा , बी. सी. रोड

बंटवाल ताल्लुक

द. क. कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-574219

116. वडनिडियूर -1016

सत्य दीप बिल्डिंग

बडनिडियूर, उडुपि ताल्लुक

उडुपि जिला

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-576115

117. बेल्लारे -1026

बेल्लारे , मुल्या ताल्लुक

द. क. जिला- कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-574212

118. बेल्मण्णु-1028

इंद्रभवन बिल्डिंग

बेल्मण्णु, काकंठा ताल्लुक

द. क. जिला- कनाटक

पिन कोड-576111 2755

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

119. बेलंगडी -1029

पो. बा. सं. 2 गुरु नारायण स्वामी बिल्डिंग वेलंगडी, द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574214

बेंदूर -1030

120.

वासमहल बिल्डिंग

बेंदूर शाखा, मंगलूर

द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-575002

121 बेट्टपाडी-1231

शिव क्षेत्र , बेट्टपाडी

पुत्तूर ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574259

ब्रावर-1037

122.

पी. बी. सं . 21 , ब्रह्मावर उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-576213

123. दर्बे - पुत्तूर-1053

पी. बी. सं . 204 कोंकण ट्रेड सेंटर, दर्बे पुत्तूर पुत्तूर ताल्लूक कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574202

धर्मस्थला-1057

124.

धर्मस्थला, बेल्तंगडी ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-576216

दोड्डतोटा-1249

125.

दोड्डतोटा, सुलूया ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574248

126. दोंडेरंगडी-1257

दोंडेरंगडी, पोस्ट-कुक्कुजे कार्कला ताल्लुक

उडुपिजिला

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574108

गुल्वाडी-1241

127.

कुंदापुर ताल्लुक

824 G1/03-3

उड्डुपिजिला

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-576283

128. हालडी -1073

पंचायत बिल्डिग हालडी, कुंदापुर ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक पिन कोड-576250

129. हेब्री-1080 कुचूर रोड हेब्री, कार्कला ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-576112

हिरियड्‌का-1085

130.

उडुपि- कार्कला रोड हिरियड्‌का, उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-576113

ईश्वरमंगला-1235

131.

पोस्ट- नेट्टनिगे पुत्तूर ताल्लुक द. क. जिला कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574313

जक्रिबेटटु -1094

132.

त्यागराज रोड, जक्रिबेटदु बंट्वाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574211

कलत्तूर -1104

133.

कापूद्वारा, उड्डुपि जिला कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574135

134. कल्लडूका -1105 श्रीराम बिल्डिंग

कल्लडूका, बंटवाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-574222

135. कंबदकोणे-1106 कुंदापुर ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला

कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-576219 2756

136. कंड्लूर-1108 ब्रिड्ज के पास कंड्लूर, उड्डुपि जिला द. क. , कर्नाटक पिन कोड-576240 137. कणियूर-1309 बी. के. कांप्लेक्स. पोस्ट-कनियूर पुत्तूर तालुका द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574328 138. कार्कला -1111 बस अड्‌डाके सामने कार्कला, उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574104 139. कासरकोड-1113 हीरेमठ-पोस्ट कासरकोड शाखा होन्नावर ताल्लुक उ. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-581342 140. कापु-1116 मेइन रोड, कापु उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574106 141. कावु -1117 किशन बिल्डिंग काबु, पुत्तूर ताल्लुक द. का. , कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574223 142. कोडिंबाला-1236 पोस्ट- कडबा पुत्तूर ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-574221 143. कोल्लमोगरू-1311

सुल्या ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 144. कोरंग्रपाडी-1127 उद्यावर द्वारा उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574118

145. कुक्किकट्टे -1237 थियेटर कांप्लेक्स, कुक्किकट्टे उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक पिन कोड-576101

146. कुक्कुजड्का-1291 बस अड्‌डा के पास कुक्कुजड्का सुल्याताल्लुक कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574212

147. कुक्कुंदूर-1129 कार्कला ताल्लुक उडुपि.जिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-576117

148. कुंब्रा-1242 हर्षा बिल्डिंग, कुंब्रा पुत्तूर ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574258

149. कुंदापुर-1048 पी.बी.सं. 21 न्यूबृंदावन बिल्डिंग , कुंदापुर उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक पिन कोड- 576201

150. मचिना-1133 पोस्ट- बल्लमंजा मचिना शाखा बेल्तंगडी ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-574295

151. मंदर्थी -1140

कार स्ट्रीट, मंदर्थी

उडुपिजिला

कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-576223 2757

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

माणि-1143

152.

राजलक्ष्मी बिल्डिग

माणि, बंट्वाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574253

मूडबेट्टु-1148

153.

ज़ोहर बिल्डिंग

मूडबेट्दु, पोस्ट- कटपाडी उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक

पिन कोड- 574105

मुंडाजे-1152

154.

सोमंथड्‌का, मुंडाजे

बेल्तंगडी ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574228

नाडा-1154

155.

एस.एस. शेट्टी बिल्डिंग नाडा, कुंदापुर ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-576222

नेट्टणा-1162

156.

अलंकार बिल्डिंग

नेट्टणा, पुत्तूर ताल्लुक

द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574230

नीरेबैलूर -1165

157.

पोस्ट- बैलूर, कार्कला ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-574102

निंट्टे -1166

158.

पोस्ट ऑफिस के पास

निट्टे, कार्कला ताल्लुक

द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574110

पहुबिद्रि-1167

159.

महादेवी बिल्डिंग

मेइन रोड, पडुबिद्रि

उडुपिजिला,

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड- 574111 पक्षिकेरे -1168

160.

पोस्ट-केम्ाल, हलेयंगडी द्वारा द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574146

161. पांगला-1172 मेइन रोड पांगला उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-576122

162. पेडूर-1174 अलंकार हेगडे बिल्डिंग कार स्ट्रीट, पेडूर उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-576124

163. पोलली-1175 बी. सी. रोड द्वारा बंटूवाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574284

164. पुत्तूर - मेइन-1177 पो. बा. सं . 2 के. पी . कांप्लेक्स, पुत्तूर, द. क. जिला , कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574201

165. साइबरकट्टे -1185 उडुपिताल्लुक उडुपिजिला,

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-576266

166.

कलावर ग्राम, कुंदापुर ताल्लुक

सल्वाडि-1187 उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-576222

साणूर-1190

167.

कार्कला ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574114

सरपाडी-1310

168.

बंट्वाल ताल्लुक

द. क. जिला,

कर्नाटक

पिन कोड-574264 2758

169. शिर्वा-1197

मेइन रोड, शिर्वा शाखा उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड- 574113 170. शिशिला-1307 बेल्तंगडी ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड- 574198 171. सिद्दकट्टे -1198 बंट्वाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड- 574237 172. सूडा-1308 सूडा, कार्कला ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-576127 173. सुल्या-1378 पी कार्ड बैंक बिल्डिंग , सुल्या, पुत्तूर ताल्लुक कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574239 174. थल्लूर-1243 कुंदापुर ताल्लुक उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड-576230 175. तोट्टम -1206 चर्च के सामने थोट्टम शाखा, उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-576143 176. तुंबे -1207

मेइन रोड, तुंबे बंट्वाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिन कोड- 574170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] 177.

उडुपि ताल्लुक

उचिला-1210 उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक

पिनकोड-574117

178. उदने -1239

पोस्ट-शिराडी

पुत्तूर ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574229

179. उडुपि मेइन-1211 सुरेखा बिल्डिंग , उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड- 576101

180. उडुपि- पुत्तूर-1212 संतेकट्टे, कल्याणपुर उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड- 574125

181. उजिरे -1213

कॉलेज रोड, उजिरें बेल्थंगडीताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574240

182. विट्टला-1222

विट्टला पुत्तूर रोड, विट्टल

बंट्वाल ताल्लुक द. क. जिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574243

183. एल्लूर -1227

पडुबिद्रि- शिर्वा रोड पोस्टपिलर, एल्लूर उडुपिजिला, कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574113 2759

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

बर्धमान क्षेत्र द्वारा अनुशंसित शाखाएँ:

1. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. भातुरिया, चाक बामुनगरिया, जिला-बर्धमान, पिन-713 512.

2. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. बी. सी. रोड, 75 , विजय चन्द रोड, पो. जिला: बर्धमान, पिन-713 101 .

3. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. जी. टी. रोड, 109; जी. टी. रोड, जिला: बर्धमान, पिन-713 101 .

4. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. हरिपुर केन्दा, पो. : हरिपुर, भाया: बहुला, जिला: बर्धमान, पिन-713 342.

5. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. खतियार, पो.: कालानपुर, जिला: बर्धमान, पिन-713 128.

6. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. अम्बिकानगर, गाँव पो.: अम्बिकानगर, जिला: बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 140.

7. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. गोपीनाथपुर, गाँव+पो.: गोपीनाथपुर, जिला: बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 101 .

8. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शा. का. हेतिया, भाया-जायपुर, गाँव+पो.: हेतिया, जिला बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 138.

9. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. इन्दास , गाँव+पो. : इन्दास , जिला : बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 205 .

10. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का.- मसियारा , गाँव+पो.: मसियारा, जिला बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 101.

11. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का.-मोयनापुर, गाँव+पो.: मोयनापुर, जिला : बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 138 .

12 . पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. राधा नगर , पो. : बोन राधानगर, जिला: बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722157.

13. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. सन्तोर, गाँव+पो.: बलियारा , जिला : बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 101 .

14. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. श्यामनगर ( जायपुर ) , गाँव+पो. : श्यामनगर, जिला बॉकुड़ा, पिन-722 138 .

15. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. बैबनन बाजार, पो. : बैबनन बाजार, जिला: हुगली, पिन-712305.

16. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का.- बामुनरी, दिल्ली रोड, पो.: रिषड़ा, जिला: हुगली, पिन-712248 .

17. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. भण्डारहाटी, गाँव+पो.: भण्डारहाटी, जिला: हुगली, पिन-712301.

18. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का.- नालीकुल , पो.: नालीकुल, जिला: हुगली, पिन-712407.

19. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. नीमडंगी , भाया : भाटीपारा, पो. : नीमडंगी , जिला: हुगली, पिन-712414.

20. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शा. का. राजबलहाट, पो. : राजबलहाट, जिला हुगली, पिन-712408 .

21. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शा. का. श्यामपुर बाजार, पो.: पार श्यामपुर, जिला: हुगली, पिन-712401 .

22. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का.- मल्लारपुर, गाँव+पो.: मल्लारपुर ( दक्षिणग्राम ) , जिला बीरभूम, पिन-731 245.

23. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. सुकना, पो.: सुकमा ( छावनी ) , जिला: दार्जिलींग , पिन-734 225.

2760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

24. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शा. का.-विधान नगर, पो. : बाटाबारी, भाया : चालसा, जिला: जलपाईगुडी, पिन-735 206.

25. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. कुम्भीरा, गाँव+पो.: जैनपुर, भाया : कालियाचौक, जिला : मालदा, पिन-732201 .

26. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. बेवा, गाँव: पलासी, पो.: फराक्का, जिला: मुर्शिदाबाद, पिन-742212.

27. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. रायगंज, पो. : रायगंज, हजारीलाल मार्किट कॉम्प्लेक्स, जिला उ. दिनाजपुर, पिन-733 134.

28. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शा. का. रामपारा चांचरा, पो. चांचरा, जिला: दि. दिनाजपुर, पिन-733 124.

29. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शा. का. गंगटोक, 31 ए- राष्ट्रीय राजपथ,

पो.: देवराली, गंगटोक , सिक्कम, पिन-737 102.

राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के नियम 10( 4) के अन्तर्गत अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों की सूची-अंचल कार्यालय, चेन्नई

30. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 26-27 , रहेजा टावर्स, महात्मा गांधी रोड,

बेंगलूर-560 001 .

31. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शाखा कार्यालय : श्रीनिवास सरडगी,

तालुक व जिला गुलबरगा,

श्रीनिवास सरडगी-585 286.

32. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : कोल्लम बिग बाजार, बिग बाजार,

कोलम-691 001.

33. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शाखा कार्यालय: एरनाक्युलम, एम जी रोड, 35/2240 -ए, एम. जी. रोड, रविपुरम ,

एरनाक्युलक्म-682 016 .

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 34. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शाखा कार्यालय: तिरुवनंतपुरम स्टेच्यू जंक्शन, 1945, स्टेच्यूजंक्शन,

तिरुवनंतपुरम-695 001 .

35. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक,

शाखा कार्यालय: तिरुवनंतपुरम ओवरब्रिज जंक्शन, ओवरब्रिज जंक्शन, एम. जी. रोड, तिरुवनंतपुरम -695 001 .

36. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय: मेमनगर, सुभाष चौक, मेमनगर, अहमदाबाद-380 052 . जिला अहमदाबाद

37. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक,

पूर्वी अंचल कार्यालय, ए. पी. जे. हाऊस, चौथी मंजिल, 15, पार्कस्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700 016 .

कार्यालयों को राजभाषा अधिनियम 10( 4 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिसूचितकरना

उपर्युक्त नियम के अन्तर्गत अधिसूचित करवाने हेतु शाखाओं की सूची अंग्रेजी एवं हिंदी में अलग - अलग पृष्ठों पर 3-3 प्रतियों में संलग्न कर रहे हैं ।

38. प्रबंधक,

पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, ब्रजराजनगर, लम्टीबहल, ब्रजराजनगर-768 230 .

39. प्रबंधक,

पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, मानेश्र्वर,

संबलपुर-768 120.

40. प्रबंधक,

पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, लईकेरा ,

झारयुगुडा-768 215 .

41. प्रबंधक, पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, किसननगर,

कटक-754131 .

42. प्रबंधक, पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, बन्थ,

भद्रक-756 120 .

43. प्रबंधक,

पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, दर्पण, चंडीखोल,

जाजपुर-755 044.

2761

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

विशाखापतनम

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, प्लाट सं. 44, पांडुरंगपुरम, विशाखापतनम-530 003.

2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, सरिता विहार शाखा, नईदिल्ली

राजस्थान

3. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, सेवा शाखा, उदयपुर

सिंडिकेट बैंक

1. सिंडिकेट बैंक अग्रणी जिला कार्यालय, श्रीनीवास नगर डा. पे . स. 35 अनंतपुर-515 001 ( आं. प्र. ) 2. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोनकोंड्लाशाखा, दरवाजा नं . 1/102, कोनकोंड्ला, बज्रकरूर मण्डल, अनंतपुर-515 842 (आं. प्र. ) 3. सिंडिकेट बैंक, हिन्दूपुर शाखा, ईडिंग रामय्या बिल्डिंग, बालाजी टॉकिस सर्कल, रेलवे स्टेशन रोड, हिन्दुपुर-515 201 अनंतपुर जिला ( आं. प्र. ) 4. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बैलकुप्पेशाखा, बेंगलूर - मंगलूर रोड, बैलकुप्पे , पिरियापट्ना तालुक, जिला मैसूर, कर्नाटक, पिन-571 104

5. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गुंड्लुपेट शाखा, बेंगलूर - नीलगिरी रोड, डा. पे. सं. 2 , गुंड्लुपेट,, जिला चामराजनगर, कर्नाटक पिन -571 111 .

6. सिंडिकेट बैंक, नंजनगूडशाखा, रेलवे गेट के पास, ब्राडवे रोड, नंजनगूड, जिला मैसूर, कर्नाटक, पिन-571 301 .

7. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सोमनहल्ली शाखा, बेंगलूर - मैसूर रोड, सोमनहल्ली, जिला मण्डया , कर्नाटक, पिन-571 429.

8. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मदूर शाखा, बेंगलूर रोड, मदूर, जिला मण्डया, कर्नाटक, पिन-571 428 .

9. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अहमदाबाद पत्थरकुआ शाखा, बिजनेस सेन्टर, अंबिका सेन्टर के पास, रिलीफरोड- पत्थरकुआ अहमदाबाद-380 001 .

10. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अहमदाबाद- आश्रम रोड शाखा, नेप्चुन टावर्स, नेहरू ब्रिज के सामने, आश्रम रोड, अहमदाबाद -380 009 .

11. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अहमदाबाद - रिलीफ रोड शाखा, 4611 , सदाकेत बिल्डिंग- रिलीफ रोड, झाकरिया मस्जिदके पास , अहमदाबाद -380 001 .

12. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अहमदाबाद- नवरंगपुरा शाखा, मणिक्य एपार्टमेन्ट, सरदार पटेल नगर, होटल क्लसीक गोल्ड के सामने- नवरंगपुरा, अहमदाबाद-380 006 .

13. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अहमदाबाद नवावाडंज शाखा , सत्यम शोपिंग सेन्टर, प्रथम तल, भीमाजीपुरा , चार रास्ता, नवावाडज, अहमदाबाद-380 013 .

14. सिंडिकेट बैंक , अहमदाबाद माणेक चौक शाखा, जैनवाडी, अहमदाबाद-380 001 .

15. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अहमदाबाद खाडिया रायपुा शाखा, रायपुर चकला, चकलेश्रर महादेय मंदिर के पास- खाडिया रायपुर एरिया, अहमदाबाद-380 001 .

2762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

16. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सुरेन्द्र नगर शाखा, जवाहर रोड, पुरानी कन्याशाला के सामने, सुरेन्द्रनगर-363 001 .

17. सिंडिकेट बैंक, भुज शाखा, 4 बैंकर्स कॉलोनी, मांडवी रोड, भुज ( कच्छ) -370 001

18. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सेगवा शाखा, ग्रा. पो. सेगवा, ता. कामरेज, जिला सूरत ( गुजरात ) , सेगवा-394 320.

19. सिंडिकेट बैंक, वलसाड शाखा , रामकृपा, नानी खत्रीवाड, एम. जी. रोड, वलसाड ( गुजरात ) -396 001.

20. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

मोरबी शाखा, सवसर प्लोट, दोशी टावर्स, प्रथम तल , मोरबी, जि. राजकोट ( गुजरात ) , पिन-363 641.

21. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मोटी खावडीशाखा, आर. पी. एल . साइट के पास , द्वारका रोड, पो. दिग्विजय ग्राम , जि. जामनगर ( गुजरात ) , मोटी खावडी-361 140.

22. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बगुमरा शाखा, ता. पलसाणा, जि. सूरत ( गुजरात ) , बगुमरा-394605.

23. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कडोदरा शाखा, शक्तिसदन, एन. एच. सं. 8, ग्रा. पो . कडोदरा, ता. पलसाणा, जि. सूरत (गुजरात ) , कडोदरा -394 327.

24. सिंडिकेट बैंक, दासज शाखा, अक्षर पुरूषोतम स्वामी नारायण मंदिर, दासज , ता. ऊंझा, जि. मेहसाणा ( गुजरात ) , कडोदरा-384 170.

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 25. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

बडोदरा ( बडौदा ) रावपुरा शाखा, सत्येन चेम्बर्स, उषाकिरण बिल्डिग के पीछे, प्रताप रोड, रावपुरा , बडोदरा ( बडौदा ) -390 001 .

26. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गांधीनगर शाखा, ' समृद्धि' जी एच-4 , सेक्टर 16, गांधी नगर ( गुजरात ) -382 016.

27. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पोरबंदर शाखा, केदारेश्वर रोड, पोरबंदर ( गुजरात ) -360 575 .

28. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गांधीधाम शाखा, प्लाट नं. 240, सेक्टर 12बी, नाहटा चेम्बर्स, गांधीधाम, जि. कच्छ गुजरात , पिन-370 201.

29. सिंडिकेट बैंक, हजिरा शाखा, श्रीकृष्ण बिल्डिंग, सूरत - हिजरा रोड, ता. चोर्यासी, जि. सूरत , हजिरा-394 270 .

30. सिंडिकेट बैंक, राजकोट शाखा, 3 , मोदी बिल्डिंग , धरमेन्द्ररोड, राजकोट ( गुजरात ) -360 001 .

31. सिंडिकेट बैंक, ऐथोर शाखा, ऐथोर प्रगति मंडल बिल्डिंग , जि. मेहसाणा ( गुजरात ) , पिन-384 175.

1 32. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मक्तुपुर शाखा, श्री नीलकंठ विद्यालय बिल्डिंग, ता. ऊँझा, जि. पाटण ( गुजरात ) , मक्तुपुर-384 170.

33. सिंडिकेट बैंक, एरथान शाखा, ताकरमा पाटिया, ता. ओलपाड, जिला सूरत ( गुजरात ) , एरथान-394 540 .

34. सिंडिकेट बैंक, वडोदरा ( मांडवी ) मुख्य शाखा, घायबर शोपिंग सेन्टर, गेंडिगेट-मांडवी रोड, वडोदरा-390 017 ( गुजरात ) 2763

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii )]

35. सिंडिकेट बैंक, जामनगर शाखा, अंजारियां चैम्बर्स, प्रथम तल, ए और बी ब्लॉक, के. वी. रोड, जामनगर-360 001 गुजरात

36. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मुंबई खार शाखा, कुकीविला, 4, मंजिल खार पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 052.

37. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मुंबई सुन्दर नगर (मालाड पश्चिम ) शाखा मदीना मंजील, एस.वी.रोड गोरेगांव पश्चिम मुंबई-400 062.

38. सिंडिकेट बैंक , मांडवी शाखा 93-93ए-95 सुन्दर हाऊस काजी सेठ स्ट्रीट मांडवी मुंबई-400 003.

39. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मरोल शाखा, बी-59 गिरीराज इंडस्ट्रीज इस्टेट महाकली केवज रोड, मरोल मुंबई-400 093.

40. सिंडिकेट बैंक , मुलुंड शाखा 543सागर निवास एन. एस. रोड, मुलुंड पश्चिम मुंबई-400 080.

41. सिंडिकेट बैंक, माहीम शाखा 206 रामेश्वर, सिटी लाईट सिनेमाके सामने लेडीजमशेटजी रोड, माहिम मुंबई-400 016.

42. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

मलबार हिल शाखा श्रीपाल नगर, 12 जे एम मेहता रोड मलबारहिल मुंबई-400 006.

43. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अंधेरी पश्चिम शाखा 210/सी विमल अपार्टमेन्ट सी जी बर्फीवाला मार्ग, जुहू लेन अंधेरी पश्चिम मुंबई-400 058.

824G1/03-4

44. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गोडदेव शाखा निकीशा आर्केड गोडदेव फाटक रोड भायंदर पूर्व -401105

45. सिंडिकेट बैंक, भिवंडी शाखा 404, विशिन अपार्टमेंट, बी विंग 1 मंजील, गोकुल नगर भिवंडी-421302

46. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कामन शाखा गोविन्दपाटील बिल्डिंग बस स्टैंड कामन महाराष्ट्र-401202

47. सिंडिकेट बैंक, इचलकरेंजी शाखा 10/286, बंगालो मार्ग स्टेडियम के सामने, पोस्ट बैग सं . 89 इचलकरेंजी-416115 (महाराष्ट्र राज्य)

48. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पुणे आवास वित्त शाखा भारती विद्यापीठ भवन तीसरी मंजिल , लाल बहादुर शास्त्रीमार्ग पुणे-411030 (महाराष्ट्र)

49. सिंडिकेट बैंक, शिरडीशाखा द पिलग्रिम्स इन. एम टी डी सी कोपरगांव तहसील शिरडी-423109 जिला अहमदनगर ( महाराष्ट्र राज्य)

50. सिंडिकेट बैंक, शेंदरेशाखा शाहु नगर, शेंदरे-415001 जिला सातारा (महाराष्ट्र राज्य ) 51. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

कल्याणपुर शाखा मेन रोड, कल्याणपुर. उडुपि तालुक, जिला उडुपि कर्नाटक राज्य पिन-576114

52. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मणिपाल शाखा डा. पे. सं. 13 ठहुपि जिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-576119 2764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15, 1925

53. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कापुशाखा मेनरोड, कापु उड्डुपि जिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-574106

54. सिंडिकेट बैंक, उड्डुपि न्यूमार्केट यार्ड शाखा पहली मंजिल, बैदश्री बिल्डिंग न्यूमार्केटयार्ड डाक अंदलपाडी, उड्डुपि जिला कर्नाटक-576103

55. सिंडिकेट बैंक, श्रृंगेरी शाखा भारती स्ट्रीट, श्रृंगेरी चिकमगलूर जिला कर्नाटक पिन कोड -577139

सिंडिकेट बैंक, मंगलूर आवास वित्त शाखा सिंडिकेट बिल्डिंग , तल मंजिल हम्पनकट्टा, मंगलूर, दक्षिण कन्नड जिला कर्नाटक पिनकोड-575001

57. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मंगलूर मिशनस्ट्रीट शाखा मिशनस्ट्रीट दक्षिण कन्नड जिला कर्नाटक 575001

58. सिंडिकेट बैंक, निंबगल शाखा उरवकोंडा तालुक जिला अनंतपुर आन्ध्र प्रदेश -515824

59. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गुंतकल शाखा 16/86, ओल्ड बस स्टैंड मेन रोड, गुंतकल जिला अनंतपुर आन्ध्रप्रदेश -515801

60. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कल्याणदुर्ग शांखा 8/931, हिन्दूपुर रोड घंटा बिल्डिंग , कल्याणदुर्ग जिला अनंतपुर आन्ध्र प्रदेश -515761

61. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सिद्धार्थ मेडिकल कॉलेज शाखा एनटीआर यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] हेल्थसाइन्सेस , रिंग रोड विजयवाडा आन्ध्र प्रदेश -520008

62. सिंडिकेट बैंक, दांडीशाही शाखा ग्राम एवं डाकघर दांडीशाही जिला केन्द्रपाडा उडीसा-754240

63. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पोडाडिहा शाखा डाकघर पोडाडिहा वाया नुढडिहा जिला मयूरभंज उडीसा-757079

64. सिंडिकेट बैंक, टंगुटूरु शाखा द्वार सं. 13-21 ग्रैंड ट्रंक रोड टंगुटूरु -523274 ओंगोल मंडल, प्रकाशम जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)

65. सिंडिकेट बैंक, दोर्नाला शाखा के.जी. रोड दोर्नाला-523331 मार्कापुर मंडल प्रकाशम जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)

66. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मारेल्लाशाखा मारेल्ला-523201 द्वारा अद्दकि प्रकाशंम जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)

67. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पोथलपाडु शाखा पोथलपाडु-523315 गज्जलकोन्डा एस.ओ. तलुपाडु मंडल प्रकाशम जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)

68. सिंडिकेट बैंक, नागुलवरम शाखा नागुलवरम-523333 द्वारा कंबम प्रकाशम जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश) 2765

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

69. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अंबवरम शाखा अंबवरम-523112 रामालयम नज़दीक सी. एम. पुरम मंडल प्रकाशम जिला (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)

70. सिंडिकेट बैंक , मुंबई आंचलिक कार्यालय मेकरटावर सं. ई दूसरी मंजिल प्लॉट सं. 85, कफ परेड कोलाबा, मुंबई 400005 71. सिंडिकेट बैंक, शिखरपुर शाखा ग्राम एवं डाकघर शिखरपुर वाया सरणकुल, जिला नयागड उडीसा, पिन-752080 72. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पाट्टपुर शाखा पाट्टपुर, दिगपहांडी तहसील जिला गंजाम उडीसा, पिन-761013 73. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बारिपदा शाखा डाक पेटी सं . 5 , बडा बाजार बारिपदा, जिला मयूरभंज उड़ीसा, पिन-757001 74. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बड़पडाशाखा ग्राम एवं डाकघर- बडपडा जिला केन्द्रपाडा उडीसा, पिन-754245 75. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पराहाटशोखा ग्राम एवं डाकघर पराहाट जिला जगतसिंहपुर, उडीसा, पिन-754108 76. सिंडिकेट बैंक , रायगड शाखा रायगड, वाया परलेखमुंडी जिला गजपति उडीसा, पिन-761213 77. सिंडिकेट बैंक , सिरला शाखा

सिटी थाना रोड सिरसा हरियाणा, पिन-125055

78. सिंडिकेट बैंक, हिण्डन एयर फोर्स स्टेशन शाखा हिण्डन

जिला गाजियाबाद उत्तर प्रदेश, पिन-201004

79. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बुलन्दशहर डी.ए.वी. कॉलेज शाखा रेलवे रोड बुलन्दशहर जिला बुलन्दशहर उत्तर प्रदेश, पिन-203001

80. सिंडिकेट बैंक, हापुड एस.एस.वी. कॉलेज शाखा

दिल्लीरोड हापुड़ जिला गाजियाबाद उत्तर प्रदेश, पिन-245101

81. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

चंडीगढ़ शाखा

एस सी ओ 66-67 सेक्टर 17बी बैंकस्क्वेयर डा. पे. सं. 107 चंडीगढ़ -160 017

82. सिंडिकेट बैंक, लखीमपुरशाखा 362- नई बस्ती बस स्टेशन रोड, लखीमपुर-खीरी

उत्तर प्रदेश -262 701

83. सिंडिकेट बैंक, रायचूर स्टेशन रोड शाखा स्टेशन रोड : रायचूर कर्नाटक-584 101

84. सिंडिकेट बैंक, होसपेट लघु उद्योग शाखा डाक पेटी सं . 5

स्टेशन रोड, होसपेट जिला बल्लारी

कर्नाटक-583 201

85. सिंडिकेट बैंक, हगरी शाखा मेसर्स पाण्ट सिमेन्ट व 2766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

मिनरल इंडस्ट्रीज लि.

फैक्टरी क्षेत्र , हगरी

जिला बल्लारी

कर्नाटक-583 138

86. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मैसूर सेंट फिलोमिना कॉलेज कैंपस शाखा मैसूर- बेंगलूर रोड मैसूर

कर्नाटक-570 015

87. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

कुवेम्पुनगर शाखा 834, कांति कांप्लेक्स नया कांतराज अरस रोड

कुवेम्पुनगर, मैसूर कर्नाटक-570 023

88. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मैसूर एनआईई शाखा मानंदवाडि रोड मैसूर

कर्नाटक-570 008

89. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मैसूर चामुंडीपुरम शाखा 904/3, झाँसी लक्ष्मी बाई रोड चामुंडीपुरम

मैसूर कर्नाटक -570 003

90. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मैसूर जे.पी. नगर शाखा महावीर काँप्लेक्स डीब्लॉक, जे.पी. नगर मैसूर

कर्नाटक-570 008

91. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बेंगलूर जयनगर 4 टी ब्लॉक शाखा 4 टीब्लॉक, 16 मेन रोड जयनगर बेंगलूर कर्नाटक-560 041

92. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बेंगलूर विजया कॉलेज कैंपस शाखा आर.वी. रोड

बसवनगुडी बेंगलूर कर्नाटक-560004

93. सिंडिकेट बैंक, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय षयनीर टवर्स , प्रथम तल

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] षण्मुखमरोड

डा. पे. सं . 2616 एरणाकुलम कोच्चि केरल-682031

94. सिंडिकेट बैंक, एरणाकुलम एम.जी. रोड शाखा मुत्सूट टवर्स, प्रथम तल द्वार सं . XL/6893 डा. पे. सं. 3629 एम. जी. रोड, एरणाकुलम

कोच्ची केरल-682 035

95. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोच्चिकोट्‌टुकुलम रोड ( मुख्य ) शाखा VI/600 , कोट्टुकुलम रोड डा. पे. सं. 153 मट्टनचेरी , कोच्चि केरल-682 002

96. सिंडिकेट बैंक , कोच्चि पेरुमानूर शाखा डा. पे. सं. 1652 पेरुमानूर कोच्चि केरल-682015

97. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोच्चिशेयर बाजार शाखा वीक्षणम रोड एरणाकुलम केरल-682 035

98. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोच्चिचेर्लाई शाखा कोकणी भाषा भवन चेर्लाई रोड, कोच्चि केरल-682 002

99. सिंडिकेट बैंक, एरणाकुलम आवास वित्त शाखा मुत्तूट टवर्स, प्रथम मंजिल द्वार सं . XL/6893 एम. जी. रोड, एरणाकुलम केरल-682 035

100. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोलिकोड चेरुट्टी रोड ( मुख्य ) शाखा डा. पे. सं . 61

चेरुट्टी रोड कोलिकोड केरल-673 001

101. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोलिकोड कुडुपुरम्बा शाखा द्वार सं . 38/1610 ( वार्ड 36 & 37) 2767

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कुण्डुपरम्बा, डाक एडक्काड कोलिकोड

केरल-673 005

102. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पालक्काड मेलामुरी शाखा प्रथम तल, के.टी. के. आर्केड मेलापुरी जंक्शन डाक पल्लिपुरम पालक्काड केरल -678 006

103. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कलमश्शेरी शाखा वुडलैण्डसअनेक्स एलूर रोड, कलमश्शेरी केरल-683104

104. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अंगमाली शाखा 20/148 , जनता बिल्डिंग प्रथम तल, चर्च जंक्शन अंगमाली, केरल-683 572

105. सिंडिकेट बैंक, वडकरा शाखा 20/408ए, मौर्या आर्केड डा. पे. सं. 4 , वडकरा केरल -673 101

106. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोईलाण्डीशाखा

डा. पे. सं. 1 , तालुक ऑफीस के सामने मेन रोड, कोइलाण्डी

केरल -680 020

107. सिंडिकेट बैंक, त्रिश्शूर शाखा डा. पे . सं. 511 पैलेस रोड, त्रिश्शूर केरल-680 020

108. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मट्टत्तूर शाखा 10/528 , कोडाली, डाक पाडी तालुक मुकुंदमुरम जिला त्रिश्शूर केरल-680 699

109. सिंडिकेट बैंक, त्रिक्कूरशाखा मुख्यरोड, 1/383 त्रिक्कूर-ओल्लूर केरल-680314

110. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गुरवायुर शाखा कृष्णांजली शॉपिंग कॉम्पलेक्स ईस्ट नडा, गुरुवायूर केरल-680 101

111. सिंडिकेट बैंक , तिरुरशाखा, डा. पे. सं. 36 , सी के एल बिल्डिंग्स , तालेपालम जंक्शन, तिरुर, जिला मल्लुपुरम, केरल-676 101

112. सिंडिकेट बैंक, तोडुपुलाशाखा, डा. पे. सं. 7, प्रकाश बिल्डिंग्स, तोडुपुल्ला, जिला इडुक्कि, केरल-685584

113. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोच्चिमुद्रातिजोरी, कोट्टुकुलम रोड, डा. पे. सं. 153, कोच्चि, केरल-682 002

114. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोच्चिवडुतला शाखा, वक्कच्चन टवर्स, चित्तूर रोड, वडुतला, एरणाकुलम, कोच्चि, केरल-682 002

115. सिंडिकेट बैंक, एरणाकुलम बेनर्जी रोड शाखा , XLI 768 , प्रथम तल, डा. पे . सं. 1902, बेनर्जी रोड, एरणाकुलम, केरल-682018

116. सिंडिकेट बैंक, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, हुबली, 2/4, मानवी बिल्डिंग, 144, नीलिजिन रोड, डा. पे. सं. 557 , हुबली-580 029 कर्नाटक राज्य

117. सिंडिकेट बैंक , हुबली सूपर मार्केट शाखा, दाजिबानपेट, सूपर मार्केट, डा. पे. सं. 707,

हुबली- 580 028 कर्नाटक राज्य

118. सिंडिकेट बैंक, धारवाड़ के.यू.सी. शाखा, कर्नाटक यूनिवर्सिटी कैम्पस ,

छोटा महाबलेश्वर, धारवाड -580 003

कर्नाटक राज्य 2768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

119. सिंडिकेट बैंक, करजगी शाखा, मुख्य बाजार, करजगी-581 112 कर्नाटक राज्य

120. सिंडिकेट बैंक, धारवाड़ विद्यागिरि शाखा, जे.एस.एस. कॉलेज कैम्पस , पी.बी. रोड, धारवाड-580 004 कर्नाटक राज्य

121. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

धारवाड़ कर्नाटक ए एंड एस कॉलेज शाखा, कर्नाटक कॉलेज कैम्पस, कॉलेज रोड, धारवाड-580 001 कर्नाटक राज्य

122. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बेलगांव शाहपुर शाखा, लक्ष्मीनारायण भवन, महात्मा फुले रोड, डा. पे. सं . 12 , शाहपुर, बलेगाँव-590 003 कर्नाटक राज्य

123. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सत्ती शाखा, वार्ड सं. 2 , बस स्टैंड के पास, सत्ती- 591 240 अथनी तालुक, बेनगांव जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

124. सिंडिकेट बैंक ,

देशनूर शाखा, 535 बी, शांति निवास , देशनूर-591 147 बैलहोंगल तालुक, जिला बेलगांव, कर्नाटक राज्य

125. सिंडिकेट बैंक , अज्जिानड्‌का शाखा , परियालत‌ङ्का, पोस्ट पुणचा, अज्जिनङ्का-574 281 बटवाल तालुक, दक्षिण कन्नड़ जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

126. सिंडिकेट बैंक,

मैन रोड, गुत्तिगांर- 574 218, गुत्तिगार शाखा, अभिलाषा, सुल्या तालुक, दक्षिण कन्नड़ जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 127. सिंडिकेट बैंक , मंगलूर कंकनाडीशाखा, डॉ. एल. पी. फर्नांडिस मेमोरियल बिल्डिंग , फादर मुल्लर्स सर्कल, केकनाडी, डा. पे . सं. 530 , मंगलूर- 575 002 कर्नाटक राज्य

128. सिंडिकेट बैंक ,

मंगलूर केन्द्रीय लेखा कार्यालय, डा. पे. सं. 205 , दूसरी मंजिल , रामनाथ कृपा , पोर्ट रोड, बन्दर, मंगलूर -575 001 कर्नाटक राज्य

129. सिंडिकेट बैंक, विट्टल शाखा, बस स्टैंड के पास , कैम्पको बिल्डिंग , विट्टल -574 243 बंटवाल तालुक, दक्षिण कन्नड़ जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

130. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सुल्याशाखा, एस.वी.एम. बिल्डिंग, मेन रोड, सुल्या-547 239 , दक्षिण कन्नड जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

131. सिंडिकेट बैंक , एलेमडलु शाखा, बालेहोन्नूर- जयपुर रोड, पोस्ट दुर्गदबेट्टा , एलेमडलु-574' 239 , कोप्पा तालुक चिकमगलूर जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

132. सिंडिकेट बैंक, गुरुवायनकेरे शाखा, नागरिक सेवा समिति बिल्डिंग , पहली मंजिल, मेन रोड, गुरुवायनकेरे-574 217, बेल्तगडी तालुक दक्षिण कन्नड जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

133. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मंगलूर मुद्रा तिजोरी, ' पंजमी' कॉम्प्लेक्स, के.एस.आर.टी.सी. बस स्टैंड के सामने, कावूर क्रॉस, बिजै , मंगलूर-575 004 दक्षिण कन्नड जिला कर्नाटक राज्य

134. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बाकूरशाखा, कारस्ट्रीट, डा. पे. सं. 1 , बाकूर-576 210 उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक राज्य [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

135. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बसरूर शाखा, पोस्ट ऑफीस रोड, बसरूर -576 211 कुन्दापुर तालुक, उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक राज्य

136. सिंडिकेट बैंक, उडुपि केथोलिक सेन्टर शाखा, सिंडिकेट टावर्स , केथोलिक सेन्टर , डा. पे. सं. 38, उडुपि-576 101 कर्नाटक राज्य

137. सिंडिकेट बैंक, एणगुड्डे शाखा , पहली मंजिल, रविराम बिल्डिंग, एणगुड्‌डे-574 105, डाक घर कटपाडी, उडुपि जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

सिंडिकेट बैंक,

138.

नक्रे शाखा, मरिया कृपा बिल्डिंग , मेन रोड, कुक्किकट्टे कुक्कुदूर पोस्ट नक्रे -576 117 , कार्कल तालुक उडुपि जिला, कर्नाटक राज्य

सिंडिकेट बैंक ,

139.

उडुपि कुंजिबेट्टु शाखा, एम.जी.एम. कॉलेज कैम्पस , ' नलंदा' कुंजिबेट्टु, उडुपि-576 101 कर्नाटक राज्य

140. सिंडिकेट बैंक, शिरुर शाखा, बैंदूर - भटकल मेन रोड, शिरुर-576 228 कुन्दापुर तालुक, उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक राज्य

141. सिंडिकेट बैंक, कोल्लूरु शाखा, 1-2, मेन रोड, कोल्लूरु -576 220 कुन्दापुर तालुक, उडुपि जिला कर्नाटक राज्य

142. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अनंतपुर मुख्य शाखा, स्टेशन रोड, डा. पे. सं. 20, अनंतपुर-515 004 आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

2769

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

143. सिंडिकेट बैंक, आत्मकूर शाखा, 7/71, पहली मंजिल, मेन रोड, आत्मकूर-515 751 अनंतपुर जिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

144. सिंडिकेट बैंक , अनंतपुर ओल्ड टाउन शाखा, मं. सं. 28/195/113 , पहली मंजिल, मेन रोड, पयनीर प्लाजा, गांधी बाजार, ओल्ड टाउन, अनंतपुर-515 002, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

145. सिंडिकेट बैंक, होन्नुरुशाखा, मकान सं. 5-61 , मेन रोड, विडपनकल द्वारा होन्नूरु-515 870 अनतपुर जिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

146. सिंडिकेट बैंक, पेनकचर्ला शाखा, पेनकचर्ला डैम, गरलदिन्नि मंडल, पेनकचर्ला 515 736 अनंतपुरजिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

147 . सिंडिकेट बैंक, सानेवारिपल्लिशाखा, एनुमुलवारिपल्लि पोस्ट सानेवारिपल्लि-515 501 अनंतपुर जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

148. सिंडिकेट बैंक, सिंगनमला शाखा, मकान सं. 4/57 , सिंगनमला-515 435 अनंतपुर जिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य

149. सिंडिकेट बैंक, ताडिपन्नि शाखा, डोर सं. 12/43 , बस स्टैंड के पास पहली मंजिल, ओगेटि शाप बिल्डिंग , ताडिपत्रि-515 411 अनंतपुर जिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य 2770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम आंचलिक कार्यालय , मुजफ्फरपुर

पता:-" पावापुरी विहार " भगवानपुर चौक के बगल में, राष्ट्रीय उच्च पथ संख्या-28 , मुजफ्फरपुर-842001 , बिहार डाकघर:- भगवानपुर

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-मोतीहारी

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम - क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, मोतिहारी पता:- बलुआटाल

जिला:- पूर्वी चम्पारण मोतीहारी

डाक सूचकांक:- 845401

राज्य:-बिहार

जिला:- मुजफ्फरपुर

डाक सूचकांक: -842001

राज्य :-बिहार

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र: - मुजफ्फरपुर 2. सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम - मुख्य आंतरिक लेखा परीक्षक कार्यालय , मुजफ्फरपुर-अंचल

पता:- कलमबाग रोड

डाकघर :- कलमबाग रोड

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम: अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय, मुजफ्फरपुर

पता:- क्षे ० कार्यालय मुजफ्फरपुर

जिला:- मुजफ्फरपुर

डाक सूचकांक:-842001

राज्य:-बिहार

जिला:- मुजफ्फरपुर

डाक सूचकांक : -842001

राज्य: -बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा कार्यालय का नाम:- क्षे ० का ० मुजफ्फरपुर पता:-स्पीकर चौक

अंचल:-मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय, वैशाली (हाजीपुर)

पता:-सिनेमा रोड, हाजीपुर

जिला:-वैशाली

डाकघर:- भाया:-

जिला: - मुजफ्फरपुर

डाक सूचकांक: -84401

राज्य :-बिहार

डाक सूचकांक:-842001

राज्य : -बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम - क्षे ० का० सिवान

पता:- नया बाजार सिवान

डाकघर:- नया बाजार सिवान

अंचल:-मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम सीतामढ़ी, अग्रणी बैंक सीतामढ़ी

पता:- नेशनल मार्केट, मेन रोड, सीतामढ़ी

जिला:-सीतामढ़ी

जिला:-सीवान

डाक सूचकांक: - 841226

डाक सूचकांक:-843302

राज्य:-बिहार

राज्य :-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र :- दरभंगा सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, दरभंगा पता:-अललपट्टी

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

10.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम: सीवान अग्रणी बैंक कार्या० पता:- नया बाजार, सीवान

जिला:-सीवान

जिला:- दरभंगा

डाक सूचकांक: -846003

राज्य:-बिहार

डाक सूचकांक: -841226

राज्य:-बिहार

2771

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

क्षेत्र:- सीवान

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 11.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम सारण अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय,

(छपरा)

पता:-न्यूमार्केट, छपरा

डाकघर : -छपरा भाया: -

जिला:-छपरा

डाक सूचकांक:- 841301

राज्य:-बिहार

क्षेत्र:-सीवान

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 12.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम - अग्रणी बैंक कार्या० गोपालगंज पता:-गोपालगंज

भाया:-

डाकघर:-गोपालगंज

जिला:-गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक:-841428

राज्य :-बिहार

क्षेत्र - दरभंगा

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 13.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम - दरभंगा, अग्रणी बैंक कार्या० पता:- क्षे० का० दरभंगा, अललापट्टी

डाकघर: दरभंगा

जिला: - दरभंगा

डाक सूचकांक: -846003

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- दरभंगा

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 14.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-मधुबनी, अग्रणी बैंक कार्या० पता:-डा० रामगोपाल मिश्र के मकान में, टाउन क्लब मैदान के पश्चिम , स्टेशन रोड, मधुबनी

जिला: -मधुबनी

डाक सूचकांक :-849211

राज्य :-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- दरभंगा

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 15.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय,

समस्तीपुर

पता:-आर्य समाज रोड

डाकघर:-समस्तीपुर

जिला:-समस्तीपुर

डाक सूचकांक: - 848101

राज्य:-बिहार

824G1/03-5

क्षेत्र:-मोतीहारी

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

16.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय, पूर्वी चम्पारण (मोतीहारी )

पता:-मोतिहारी बलुआटाल

डाकघर:-भाया :-

जिला:- पूर्वी चम्पारण (मोतीहारी )

डाक सूचकांक:-845401

राज्य:-बिहार

क्षेत्र:-मोतीहारी

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

17.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय , पश्चिमी

चम्पारण ( बेतिया)

पता:-लाल बाजार, बेतिया

जिला:-पश्चिमी चम्पारण ( बेतिया)

डाक सूचकांक:- 845438

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- पहाड़पुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 18.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- पहाड़पुर

पता:-पहाड़पुर, भगवानपुर

डाकघर:- गरजौल भाया:- भगवानपुर

जिला:- वैशाली ( हाजीपुर )

डाक सूचकांक:-844114

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 19.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- रुस्तमपुर

पता:-रुस्तमपुर

डाकघर: - रुस्तमपुर भाया:-राघोपुर

जिला:- वैशाली (हाजीपुर)

डाक सूचकांक: -844508

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 20.

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- तेरसिया

पता:-तेरसिया

डाकघर:- हाजीपुर भाया:- राघोपुर

जिला:- वैशाली ( हाजीपुर )

डाक सूचकांक:-844101

राज्य:-बिहार 2772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

अंचल:-मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-मुजफ्फरपुर

21.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- हरपुर हरदास

पता :- हरपुर हरदास

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

26.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-पोहयार

पता:-पोहयार

डाकघर:-खोखसा आाया:- देसरी

जिला:- वैशाली ( हाजीपुर )

डाक सूचकांक :-843104

राज्य:-बिहार

डाकघर:-पोहयार

जिला:-वैशाली ( हाजीपुर)

डाक सूचकांक: -844507

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

22.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- रहसा

पता:- रहसा

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

27.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- परसौना

पता:-परसौना

डाकघर:-भगवानपुर

डाकघर:- परसौना

जिला:- वैशाली ( हाजीपुर)

डाक सूचकांक: -844114

राज्य:-बिहार

जिला:- सारण ( छपरा )

डाक सूचकांक:-841219

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

23.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-अमनौर

पता:-अमनौर

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- सीवान

28 .

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- पटेरी

पता:-मीर्जापुर

डाकघर: -ब्लैक गरहा चौक अमनौर, बोचहाँ ब्लौक डाकघर:-मीर्जापुर

जिला:- मुजफ्फरपुर

डाक सूचकांक:- 843111

राज्य:-बिहार

जिला:- सारण ( छपरा )

डाक सूचकांक :- 841419

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

24.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-मेहसौल

पता:-मेहसौल

डाकघर:-मेहसौल

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

29.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-अपहर

पता, ग्राम:-अपहर, ब्लौक अमनौर

डाकघर:-अपहर

भाया:- रुन्नीसैदपुर

जिला:-सीतामढ़ी

डाक सूचकांक :-843328

राज्य :-बिहार

जिला:- सारण ( छपरा )

डाक सूचकांक:- 841402

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:-मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- मुजफ्फरपुर

25.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा कार्यालय का नाम:- माधोपुर चतुरी

पता:-माधो पुर चतुरी

अंचल:-मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

30.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- मस्तीचक

पता, ग्राम:- परसा

डाकघर:-सौरा भाया :-नानपुर

डाकघर:- मस्तीचक

जिला:-सीतामढ़ी

जिला:-सारण

डाक सूचकांक:-843333

राज्य:-बिहार

डाक सूचकांक: -841219

राज्य:-बिहार

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

31.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम : - बड़हरिया

पता:-ब्लौक बड़हरिया

डाकघर:-ब्लौक बड़हरिया

जिला:-सीवान

डाक सूचकांक : -841226

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

32.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- मुशहरी बाजार

पताग्राम :-जामो बाजार

डाकघर :-जामो बाजार

जिला:-सीवान

डाक सूचकांक: -841413

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

33.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-खजुराहा

पता:- भोरे, ब्लौक-मोरे

डाकघर :-भोरे, ब्लौक-मोरे

जिला:-गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक: -841426

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

34.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-मोहम्मदपुर

पता, ग्राम:-मोहम्मदपुर

डाकघर :- सिंघवनिया

जिला:-गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक :- 841423

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

35.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- मुगल विरैचा

पता:- मुगल विरैचा

2773 डाकघर:- मुगल विरैचा

जिला:-गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक:-84140

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:-मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

36.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-जगदीशपुर

पता, ग्राम:-जगदीशपुर

डाकघर:-जगदीशपुर

भाया:-विजयपुर जिला:- गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक:-841508

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

37.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-मझौलिया

पता:- मझौलिया बाजार

डाकघर:-मझौलिया बाजार भाया-मारे

जिला:-गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक : - 841426

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

38.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- मुबारकपुर

पता, ग्रामः-मुबारकपुर

डाकघर:- मुबारकपुर भाया:-ताजपुर फुलवरिया जिला:-सारण ( छपरा )

डाक सूचकांक :-841209

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-सीवान

39.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम - सिंघवनिया बाजार

पता, ग्राम :-भतुआ बाजार

डाकघर:-बगाहीं बाजार

जिला:-गोपालगंज

डाक सूचकांक :-841425

राज्य:-बिहार 2774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- दरभंगा

40.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-दिनमानपुर

पता:-दिनमानपुर

डाकघर:-दिनमानपुर

भाया :-अलमासनगर जिला:- समस्तीपुर

डाक सूचकांक: -848117

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र -दरभंगा

41.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- देकुली चट्टी

पता, ग्राम:- देकुली चट्टी

डाकघर:-सोनकी

भाया:-लक्ष्मीसागर जिला:-समस्तीपुर

डाक सूचकांक: -846004

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-दरभंगा

42.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- धरमपुर

पता:- धरमपुर

डाकघर:- कुशेश्वर स्थान

जिला :-दरभंगा

डाक सूचकांक :-848213

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र: - दरभंगा

43.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखाकार्यालय का नाम :- सुदई रतौली

पता:- सुदई रतौली

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ) जिला:-मधुबनी

डाक सूचकांक : -847235

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- दरभंगा

45.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- रहुआ संग्राम

पता:-माधेपुर

डाकघर:-माधेपुर भाया:-

जिला:- मधुबनी

डाक सूचकांक :-847408

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र - दरभंगा

46.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा कार्यालय का नाम :- मलमल

पता: -माकटेब स्कूल मेन रोड

डाकघर:-मलमल

जिला:- मधुबनी

डाक सूचकांक: -847229

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:- दरभंगा

47.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा कार्यालय का नाम :- पटपारा

पता:- पटपारा

डाकघर:- पटपारा

भाया :-राजनगर

जिला:-मधुबनी

डाक सूचकांक :-

1 राज्य:-बिहार

जिला:- मधुबनी

डाक सूचकांक :-847402

राज्य:-बिहार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र -दरभंगा

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-दरभंगा

48.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-हटनी

पता:- हटनी

44.

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया डाकघर :- हटनी

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:- चिचरी बुजुर्ग

भाया:- घोघरडीहा

जिला:-मधुबनी

पता:-पो. राजनगर, हाई स्कूल चिचरी रोड के पास डाकघर:-राजनगर भाया: -

डाक सूचकांक:-847402

राज्य:-बिहार

2775 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

डाकघर :- रमगढ़वा

क्षेत्र:-मोतीहारी

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

जिला:- पूर्वी चम्पारण (मोतिहारी)

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

49.

डाक सूचकांक:-845433

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- बरबल

पता, ग्राम :-बरबल, नारायणपुर

राज्य:- बिहार

भाया :-

डाकघर :- बरबल

क्षेत्र: -मोतिहारी

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

जिला: -प. चम्पारण ( बेतिया)

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

54.

डाक सूचकांक:-845105

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- देवापुर

राज्य:-बिहार

पता:-खोरीपाकर

भाया :-पाछा पाकरी

डाकघर:-खोरीपाकर

क्षेत्र:- मोतीहारी

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर

जिला: - पूर्वी चम्पारण ( मोतिहारी )

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

50 .

डाक सूचकांक:-845427

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-तौलाहाँ

पता:- हरिनगर

राज्य:-बिहार

भाया :-रामनगर

डाकघर:-तौलाहाँ

क्षेत्र:-मोतिहारी

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर

जिला:- प. चम्पारण (बेतिया)

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

55.

डाक सूचकांक :-845455

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-दलपत विशुनपुर राज्य:-बिहार

पता:- विशुनपुर ब्लॉक ढ़ाका

डाकघर:-विशुनपुर ब्लॉक ढ़ाका

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-मोवीहारी

जिला:- पूर्वी चम्पारण ( मोतिहारी )

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

51.

डाक सूचकांक :- 845427

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :-कंधवलिया

पता, ग्राम:-रामनगर

राज्य:- बिहार

डाकघर:-बगाही

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-मोतिहारी जिला:- पश्चिम चम्पारण ( बेतिया )

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

56.

डाक सूचकांक : -845106

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-केहुनियाँ

राज्य:-बिहार

पता:-केहुनियाँ

डाकघर:-केहुनियाँ

अंचल: - मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र: -मोतीहारी

जिला:- प. चम्पारण ( बेतिया )

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

52.

डाक सूचकांक :-845453

-शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम :- श्रीनगर

पता: -डुमरी बाजार

राज्य:-बिहार

डाकघर :- डुमरी बाजार

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-मोतीहारी जिला:- पश्चिम चम्पारण ( बेतिया )

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

57.

डाक सूचकांक :-845452

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-गोरा

राज्य:-बिहार

पता:- परसा फैक्ट्री

भाया:- लौरिया

डाकघर:- परसा फैक्ट्री

अंचल:- मुजफ्फरपुर क्षेत्र:-मोतिहारी

जिला: -प. चम्पारण ( बेतिया )

सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

53.

डाक सूचकांक :- 845453

शाखा/कार्यालय का नाम:-पटनी

राज्य:-बिहार

पता, ग्राम:-मंगलपुर पटनी 2776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

58. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, छत्तीसगढ़ कॉलेज, रायपुर सिविल लाइंस, ब्रायोन बाजार,

जिला: रायपुर-492 001

अंचल: रायपुर

क्षेत्र: रायपुर

59. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, मीरा रोड शाखा, साई रिद्धिकॉम्पलेक्स, मीरा रोड स्टेशन के पास मीरा रोड ( पूर्व) जिला ठाणे -401 107

अंचल: मुंबई महानगर क्षेत्र, ठाणे 60. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया,

टैगोर पब्लिकस्कूल, जयपुर (राजस्थान) वैशाली नगर, आम्रपाली सर्कल के नजदीक जिला: जयपुर-302 021

क्षेत्र: जयपुर

अंचल: दिल्ली

61. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, गीतांजली पब्लिक स्कूल, जोधपुर ( राजस्थान) , मंडोर रोड, महामंदिर जिला: जोधपुर-342 006

क्षेत्र: जोधपुर

अंचलः दिल्ली

62. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, देहरादून एस्लेहॉल, देहरादून -248 001 उत्तरांचल आंचलिक कार्यालय, आगरा

63. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, (क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय) जी.एस. रोड, भांगागढ़, शक्तिगढ़ पथ, गुवाहाटी-781 005 असम

64. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, शाखा अगरतला, पोस्टबाक्स न० 22, 66- ए, सेन्ट्रल रोड, डाकखाना : अगरतला, जिला: पश्चिम त्रिपुरा -799 001 त्रिपुरा

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 65. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, बापूजी पथ शाखा, सुआलकुची, कालेज रोड, सुआलकुची, जिला: कामरुप-781 403 असम

66. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया बरपेटा शाखा टाऊन, बी.के. रोड, बरपेटा जिला: बरपेटा-781 301 असम

67. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, बरकतलिया शाखा, गांव लीचू बागान, डाकघर : कुंजावन कठाल बागान, जिला: पश्चिम त्रिपुरा -799 006 त्रिपुरा

68. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, चारगोला शाखा, गांव व पोस्ट चारगोला बाजार, जिला: करीमगंज-788 708 असम

69. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, शाखा एच.जी.बी. रोड, अगरतला, डाकखाना : अगरतला , जिला: पश्चिम त्रिपुरा -799 001 त्रिपुरा

70. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, कोकराझार शाखा, डिपोट रोड कोकराझार, जिला: कोकराझार-783 370 असम

71. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, लैतुंगखनोऊशाखा, डाकघर: मंतरीपुखरी, जिला: इम्फाल, मनीपुर-795 002 मनीपुर

72. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया मिरजीशाखा, गुवाहाटी गोवालपारा रोड, डाकघर: मिरजा, जिलाः कामरुप-781 125 असम

73. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, महारीपारा शाखा, डाकघर: महारीपारा, जिला: कामरुप-781 366 असम भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

74. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया नगरबेरा शाखा,

डाकघर : नगरबेरा,

जिला: कामरुप -781 127

असम

75. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया नाथकुची शाखा, 111 नं० 1 , नाथकुची डाकघर : नाथकुची, वाया टीहू, जिला: नलबारी-781 371

असम

76. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया नया बसती शाखा, गांव व डाकघर दमदमा, जिला: नलबारी-781 349 असम

77. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया पलंगबरी शाखा, गांव पलंगबरी, डाकघर : पतीलादाहा जिला: बगाइगांव-783 391

असम

78. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया चैकोन बाजार शाखा, चस्साद एवेन्यू, न्यूचैकोन बाजार,

डाकघर : इम्फाल , जिला: सेन्ट्रल मनीपुर-795 001 मनीपुर

79. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया पांचग्राम शाखा,

डाकघर: पांचग्राम , जिला: हैलाकंडी-788 802 असम सादर, (कृ.मो.मिश्र. ) मुख्य अधिकारी ( राजभाषा )

आन्ध्रा बैंक ANDHRA BANK (भारत सरकार का उपक्रम ) (AGovt . of India Undertaking)

2777 2. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पालम विहार शाखा हेच ब्लाक सैनी प्लाजा, पालम विहार गुड़गांव-122017 हरियाणा

3. आन्ध्रा बैंक, गुड़गांव शाखा एससीओओफ 19 व 20 सेक्टर 31-32ए, गुड़गांव-122 001 हरियाणा

4. आन्ध्रा बैंक , करनाल शाखा

xix - 379 बस स्टैंड के सामने गगन बिल्डिंग डजी टी रोड, करनाल ( हरियाणा )

5. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पानीपत शाखा एसएफसी 48 सेक्टर पार्ट 1 हुड्‌डा कांप्लेक्स, पानीपत-132 103 हरियाणा

6. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पटियाला शाखा

9 भूींद्र रोड फाटक सं. 22 के पास, पटियाला ( पंजाब)

7. आन्ध्रा बैंक , रोहतक शाखा एससीएफ 15 एवं 15ए हुड्‌डा कमर्शियल कांप्लेक्स रोहतक-124 001 हरियाणा

8. आन्ध्रा बैंक, सैंट आन्स स्कूल शाखा बुच्चे राजूपालेम विशाखापट्टणम -530 027 विशाखापट्टणम जिला

9. आन्ध्रा बैंक, आमवालपलस मेइन रोड श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 185

10. आन्ध्रा बैंक,

मांडवकुर्ति

वया पोंदरु

राजभाषा अनुभाग RAJBHASHA ANUBHAG प्रधान कार्यालय Head Office: हैदराहाद Hyderabad (पत्र शाखा 666/32/65/138 , दिनांक 17/07/2002 का संलग्नक) 1. आन्ध्रा बैंक, द्वारका शाखा प्लाट नं० 15,101-107 कमर्शियल कांप्लेक्स सेक्टर 10 , द्वारका नई दिल्ली-110045

श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 168

11. आन्ध्रा बैंक, उमन्स शाखा चन्द्र महल के आगे श्रीकाकुलम श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 001 2778

12. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पालकोण्डा मेइन रोड श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 440 13. आन्ध्रा बैंक, राजाम मेइन रोड श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 127 14. आन्ध्रा बैंक, रणस्थलम श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532407 15. आन्ध्रा बैंक, श्रीकूर्मम श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532404 16. आन्ध्रा बैंक, भैरिसिंगुपुरम श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 185 17. आन्ध्रा बैंक, कस्पास्ट्रीट वीरघट्टम श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 460 18. आन्ध्रा बैंक , अक्कुपल्ली वीकोत्तुरू श्रीकाकुलम जिला -532 219 19. आन्ध्रा बैंक,

अडपाका वया मुर्रपाका रणस्थलम तालूक श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 440 20. आन्ध्रा बैंक,

संचाम नागरपालेम संचाम पंचायत वया पैडि भीमवरम देउनिपालवलस श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 409 21. आन्ध्रा बैंक, देउनि अल्ताडा वया टेक्कलि वज्रपुकोत्तुरू मंडल श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 211 22. आन्ध्रा बैंक,

पेदतामरापल्ली नंदिगामा मंडल श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)) 23. आन्ध्रा बैंक, रेगिडि पालकोण्डातालुक श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 440

24. आन्ध्रा बैंक, राजापुरम वया कविलि श्रीकाकुलम जिला -532 322

25. आन्ध्रा बैंक, जाडुपल्ली मेल्लीकुट्टी मंडल चापरा पोस्ट श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 216

26. आन्ध्रा बैंक, चीडिपूडि बुडितिपोस्ट सरवकोट मंडल श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 427

27. आन्ध्रा बैंक, सीतमपेट पालकोण्डातालुक श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 443

28. आन्ध्रा बैंक, सिरिपुरम वयापोंदूरु श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 168

29. आन्ध्रा बैंक, लोलुग् वयापोन्नरु श्रीकाकुलम जिला-532 168

30. आन्ध्रा बैंक, सत्यनारायणपुरम नागेश्वरराव पंतुल रोड सत्यनारायणपुरम विजयवाड़ा-520011 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

31. आन्ध्रा बैंक, कोनकंची पेनुगंचिप्रोल मंडल कृष्णा जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश -521 197

32. आन्ध्रा बैंक, तिरुवूर मेइन रोड कृष्णा जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश-521 235 2779

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

33. आन्ध्रा बैंक, आटो नगर 100 फीट रोड, जवहर आटो नगर कृष्णाजिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-520 007

34. आन्ध्रा बैंक, जग्गय्यपेट कृष्णाजिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश-521 125

35. आन्ध्रा बैंक , इब्रहीमपट्टणम सेक्यूरिटी कालनी के सामने वीटी पी एस मेइन रोड

इब्रहीमपट्टणम कृष्णा जिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-521 456

36. आन्ध्रा बैंक,

वेंकटेश्वर टॉकीस के सामने वुय्यूरु मेइन रोड, वुय्यरु

कृष्णाजिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश -521 165

आन्ध्रा बैंक,

37.

हिन्दुकॉलेज कैम्पस

बच्खुपेट, मचिलीपट्टणम

कृष्णाजिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश -521 001

38.

विजयवाडाशाखा

रंगय्यप्पारावुस्ट्रीट

आन्ध्रा बैंक, पी.बी. नं. 22 आन्ध्रा बैंक बिल्डिग्स विजयवाड़ा.

आन्ध्र प्रदेश -520 001

39. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पेनमलूरु 5/33मेइन रोड पेनमलूरु कृष्णाजिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-521 139

40. आन्ध्रा बैंक ,

गवर्नरपेट,

23-6-853 , बीसेन्ट रोड गवर्नरपेट, विजयवाड़ा कृष्णाजिला

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-520 001

824G1/03-6

41. आन्ध्रा बैंक, अहमदाबाद ( गुजरात ) आवास वित्त शाखा विशेष आवास वित्त शाखा, प्लाट सं. 149 , दुकान सं. 42, रुद्रा स्कोयर, भूतल, जज बंगला के पास, बोडकदेव,

अहमदाबाद

42. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पुना आवास वित्त शाखा

सीटीएस सं. 1329 + 1349 , 108, प्रथम तल, ओम चेम्बर्स जंगली महाराज रोड, शिवाजी नगर, पुणे-411 005

43. आन्ध्रा बैंक, आनंद ( गुजरात ) शाखा, सेन्ट्रल बैंक के पीछे , मई फेयर रोड, आनंद, गुजरात -388 001

44. आन्ध्रा बैंक, पिंपरी चिंचवाड शाखा, मा कालिका चेम्बर, प्लॉट नं . 206 पास उमेद भवन ,

पिंपरी स्टेशन रोड, पुणे,

महाराष्ट्र-411 018

45. आन्ध्रा बैंक , शिरडीशाखा,

पिंपले वाडी रोड, तलाठी ऑफिस

शिरडी, अहमद नगर जिला, महाराष्ट्र-423 109

46. आन्ध्रा बैंक, नरिमन पाइंट ( मुंबई, महाराष्ट्र)

कार्पोरेट फाइनेंस शाखा,

33 , अठ्लांटा,

नरिमन पाइंट मुंबई-400 021

47. आन्ध्रा बैंक, वास्को(गोआ ) शाखा लापाज गार्डस,

स्वतंत्र पथ,

वास्कोड गामा,

गोआ ( राज्य ) पिन-८03 80 2780

48. आन्ध्रा बैंक, म्हापसा शाखा, दुकान नं. 1-3 , एम्ब्रोसियो सेंटर, सेंट जेरोम रोड, म्हापसा-403 507

49. आन्ध्रा बैंक, रिंग रोड, ( गुजरात ) शाखा, सूरत, रिंग रोड सूरत, गुजरात-315 001

50. आन्ध्रा बैंक, अकोटा ( गुजरात ) शाखा , जी 12 , सिल्वर काइन , श्री शंकेश्वर परशुराम मार्ग , बीपीसी रोड के सामने , अकोटा, बड़ोदरा -390 020

51. आन्ध्रा बैंक , नासिक शाखा, सुयोजित संकुल, जी 7, ऊपरी भू-तल राजीव गांधी भवन (एन एम सी ) के पास, सारन्पूर रोड, नासिक -422 002

1. भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक कामर्स हाऊस, प्रथम तल, 7, रेसकोर्स रोड, न्यूपलासिया, इन्दौर-452001

दूरभाष: ( 0731 ) -435 337, 430 084 2. भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक 5-9-89/1 &2, तीसरी मंजिल , चैपल रोड, पो. बॉ. सं. 130 हैदराबाद -500 001

दूरभाष: (040 ) 23234454/23230903 3. भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक 480 , अण्णा सालै , नंदनम्, चेन्नै-600 035

दूरभाष: (040)433 0964-0286 1. कार्पोरेशन बैंक रोहिणी शाखा सी-5/6 , संजय मार्किट मंगोलपुर कलाँ सैक्टर -2, रोहिणी नईदिल्ली-110085

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2. कार्पोरेशन बैंक मुंडका शाखा प्लॉट नं. 657, मेन रोहतकरोड, मुंडका, नई दिल्ली-1100 41

3. कार्पोरेशन बैंक औद्योगिक वित्त शाखा 10वीं मंजिल, हिन्दुस्तान टाइम्सहाउस, कस्तूरबा गाँधी मार्ग नईदिल्ली-110001

ل 4. कार्पोरेशन बैंक महिपालपुर शाखा ई-52व 53 , माता चौक, महिपालपुर, नई दिल्ली-110037

5. कार्पोरेशन बैंक जनकपुरी शाखा, सी-5 , सीब्लॉक जनकपुरी, पंखा रोड, नई दिल्ली -110058

6. कार्पोरेशन बैंक मुद्रातिजोरी शाखा डब्लुजैड- जी 4/1 व जी- ए (नया नं. सैक्टर-4/65/ए) मेन नजफगढ़ रोड, महावीर नगर , नई दिल्ली-110018

7. कार्पोरेशन बैंक कैप्स शाखा एफ-14, फ्लैट नं. 210 व 211 , दुसरी मंजिल, कंपीटेंट हाउस, कनॉट सर्कस , नई दिल्ली-110001

8. कार्पोरेशन बैंक लक्ष्मी नगर शाखा 19 सागर प्लाजा जिलाकेन्द्र, लक्ष्मी नगर , नई दिल्ली-110092

9. कार्पोरेशन बैंक फ्रैंडस कालोनी शाखा 48, कम्यूनिटी सेंटर, फ्रैंडस कालोनी, नईदिल्ली-110065 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नियम 10( 4 ) के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र में अधिसूचित कराई जाने वाली इंडियन बैंक की शाखाओं/

कार्यालयों की सूची

इंडियन बैंक राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र -महाराष्ट्र 01. इंडियन बैंक डेक्कन जिमखाना 759/62 प्रभात रोड पुणे 411 004

02. इंडियन बैंक

कम्बाला हिल्स, 56, गोपाल राव देशमुख मार्ग, कम्बाला हिल, मुम्बई-400 026

03. इंडियन बैंक काम्पटीकोलीयरीज़ जिला नागपुर 441 404

04. इंडियन बैंक

कोल्हापुर 1561 सी वार्ड शिवाजी मार्ग , कोल्हापुर 416 002

05. इंडियन बैंक

नासिक शहर पो बॉ सं. 122 स्वामी आर पी रोड नासिक 422 002

06. इंडियन बैंक पिंपलगांव पिंपल गाँव डुकरा तालुका ईगतपुरी जिला नासिक 422 401

07. इंडियन बैंक पोंभुर्णा जिला चन्द्रपूर महाराष्ट्र 442506

08. इंडियन बैंक

पुणे शहर, 495मंत्री हाइट्स, शनिवार पेठ, पुणे 411 030

2781

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

09. इंडियन बैंक

सदाशिव पेठ, 1025, बीसीडी सदाशिव पेठ, पुणे411030

10. इंडियन बैंक

सांगली,

43/4 हाई स्कूल रोड, वखार भाग, सांगली 416 416

11. इंडियन बैंक

सातारा , गंगासागर, 219 प्रतापगंजपेठ, सातारा 415 002

12. इंडियन बैंक

नानापेठ,

612बी, पारसी अगियारी,

नानापेठ,

पुणे411 002

13. इंडियन बैंक

नागपुर, गोट मारे मार्केट, लक्ष्मी भवन स्क्वायर, धर्म पेठ,

नागपुर 440 010

14. इंडियन बैंक

इचलकरंजी, पोबॉ सं. 144 10/167 मुख्य मार्ग इचलकरंजी, 416 115 जिलाकोल्हापुर

15. इंडियन बैंक मंडल कार्यालय, पो बॉ सं. 938 , प्रॉग्रेस हाउस तृतीय तल , 54 वेलेजली रोड, शिवाजी

नगर, पुणे 411 005

16. इंडियन बैंक

प्रभादेवी,

386 , ब्लॉक सं. 1 ,

वीरसावरकर मार्ग, प्रभादेवी, मुंबई 400 025 2782

17. इंडियन बैंक अंधेरी, 11/21 , माधव नगर, एस. वी. रोड, अंधेरी (पश्चिम) मुम्बई-400 058 18. इंडियन बैंक

बांद्रा, शिवसदन, 288 , एस. वी. रोड, बांद्रा ( पश्चिम) मुम्बई -400 050 19. इंडियन बैंक भयन्दर, संजय प्लेस, स्टेशन रोड, भयन्दर ( पश्चिम ) जिला-थाणे , 401 101 20. इंडियन बैंक

सिद्धार्थ नगर, विवेक विद्यालय , सिद्धार्थ नगर मार्ग 2, गोरेगॉव ( पश्चिम) मुंबई-400 062

21. इंडियन बैंक

चेम्बूर, 71 सी, सुन्दर गोवन्डीरोड, चेम्बूर, मुंबई-400 071

22. इंडियन बैंक

धोन्सा, ग्राम धोन्सा तालुका वणी, जिला यवतमाल 445 314

23. इंडियन बैंक

डॉ. अम्बेडकर रोड, 601 ई, पई हाउस , डॉ. अम्बेडकर रोड, माटुंगा, मुम्बई -400 019

24. इंडियन बैंक

खार दांडा, देवी ठाकुर कृपा, 369, लिंकिंग रोड, खार ( पश्चिम) मुंबई-400 052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 25. इंडियन बैंक कल्याण जोजवालाशॉपिंग सेन्टर, रामदेव होटल के ऊपर, ए विंग, प्रथम तल, आगरा रोड, कल्याण ( पश्चिम ) 421 301

26. इंडियन बैंक जुहूविलेपार्ले विकास योजना, 12 ए, सागरविला, जुहूविलेपार्ले विकास योजना, मुम्बई-400 049

27. इंडियन बैंक किंग्स सर्किल, षणमुखानन्द हॉल भवन, 292, जयशंकर याज्ञिक मार्ग, किंग्स सर्किल, मुम्बई 400 022

28. इंडियन बैंक माहिम, 482, गार्डेन व्यू, एमएमछोटानी मार्ग, माहिम, मुम्बई-400 016

29. इंडियन बैंक मालाड, रेले स्मृति, 679 एस वी रोड, बाबूलाइन के निकट, मुम्बई-400 064

30. इंडियन बैंक माटुंगा बाज़ार पो. बॉ. सं. 6310, 356 , भण्डारकर रोड , माटुंगा, मुम्बई-400 019

31. इंडियन बैंक वडाला 205- बी, पारूथी निवास रक रोड , वडाला, मुंबई-400 031

32. इंडियन बैंक प्रार्थना समाज, विजय चैम्बर्स, त्रिभुवन मार्ग, ड्रीमलैंड सिनेमा के सामने, मुंबई-400 004 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

33. इंडियन बैंक एनआरआईशाखा, लक्ष्मी भवन सर पी एम रोड, फोर्ट मुंबई-400 001 34. इंडियन बैंक सीबीडी बेलापुर 30सेक्टर 11 , सीबीडी बेलापुर, नवी मुम्बई-400 614 35. इंडियन बैंक उल्हास नगर, संगम मैरेजहाल शिवाजी चौक, उल्हास नगर, जिला थाणे-421 003 36. इंडियन बैंक भिवन्डी, 51 , मुक्ता कुटीर, नवी चॉल, भिवन्डी-421 302 जिला-थाणे

37. इंडियन बैंक बसई रोड, दत्तात्रेय शॉपिंग सेन्टर, स्टेशन रोड, नवघर, वसई रोड ( पश्चिम ) जिला थाणे-401 202 38. इंडियन बैंक

दादर, राधाकृष्ण निवास, 11-12 , लाइब्रेरी लाइन, एनसी केलकर रोड, दादर (पश्चिम) मुंबई-400 028

39. इंडियन बैंक

गोरेगाँव, एविंग अशोक सुपर मार्केट, एस वी रोड, आरेरोड जंक्शन, गोरेगाँव ( पश्चिम) मुंबई-400 062

40. इंडियन बैंक

मुलुंड, त्रिवेदी टॉवर, प्रथम तल, जवाहरलाल नेहरू रोड, मुलुंड (पश्चिम) मुंबई-400 080

2783

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

41. इंडियन बैंक लखमापुर तालुकादिनदोरी जिला नासिक 422 202

42. इंडियन बैंक मार्डी जिला अमरावती-444 903

43. इंडियन बैंक सोलापुर 11, नवीपेठ सोलापुर-413 007

44. इंडियन बैंक शेगांव जिला चन्द्रपुर-442 906 राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-गुजरात

45. इंडियन बैंक अहमदाबाद मुख्य पो. बॉ सं. 257 मिशन रोड, भद्र, अहमदाबाद-380 001

46. इंडियन बैंक

दक्षिणी सोसायटी दीक्षित बंगला मणिनगर अहमदाबाद-380 008

47. इंडियन बैंक नड़ियाद सन्तराम रोड, फ़व्वारे के सामने, नड़ियाद, ज़िला खेड़ा, -387 001

48. इंडियन बैंक आश्रम रोड मारूति हाउस आश्रम रोड अहमदाबाद-380 009

49. इंडियन बैंक गोधरा, एम एन्ड एम मेहता हाई स्कूल के निकट, बाहरपुरा, गोधरा , जिला पंचमहल-389 001

50. इंडियन बैंक

अलकापुरी 5, सुधानगर जेतलपुर रोड अलकापुरी जिला-बड़ौदा-390 005 2784

51. इंडियन बैंक

पानोली

एल/913/7 , जीआईडीसी पानोली अंकलेश्वर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट

जिला भरूच-394 116 52. इंडियन बैंक

सूरत पो बा सं. 376 रिंग रोड

बेल्जियम टावर

सूरत-395 003

53. इंडियन बैंक

जूनागढ़

मंगनाथ रोड

पंच हाटड़ीचौक

जूनागढ़-362 001 54. इंडियन बैंक

भुज

पोबॉ सं. 33

स्टेशन रोड, भुज

जिला कच्छ-370 001 55. इंडियन बैंक

वेरावल

405/406 जीआईडीसी वेरावल,

जिला जूनागढ़-362 269 56. इंडियन बैंक

भरूच

बी- 10-3

स्टेशन रोड

भरूच-392 001

57. इंडियन बैंक

फतेहगंज

मेन रोड

फतेहगंज

बडौदा-390 002

58. इंडियन बैंक

सुरासामल

पटेलस्ट्रीट

सुरासामल

जिला खेड़ा-387 115 59. इंडियन बैंक

अंजेसर

तालुका साविल

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] जिला बड़ौदा-391 775

60. इंडियन बैंक आठवा लाइन्स

23-28 कॉर्नर प्वाइंट कॉम्पलेक्स, सिटी लाइट, आठवालाइन्स, सूरत 395 007

61. इंडियन बैंक

मंडल कार्यालय, " नवरंग ", स्वस्तिकचार रास्ता, गुजरात विश्वविद्यालय मार्ग, नवरंगपुरा, अहमदाबाद -380 009

62. इंडियन बैंक

पालड़ी, मुखी कॉर्नर, पी टी कालेज क्रॉस रोड, नारायण नगर रोड, पालड़ी

अहमदाबाद-380 007

63. इंडियन बैंक

नवरंगपुरा, टेलिफोन एक्सचेंज के सामने , सी. जी. रोड, नवरंगपुरा, अहमदाबाद-380 009

64. इंडियन बैंक

महेसाणा, जनता सुपर मार्केट राजमहल रोड महेसाणा 384 001

65. इंडियन बैंक

नवसारी, 231, एम जी रोड, नवसारी, जिला वलसाड-396 445

66. इंडियन बैंक

भावनगर, काँटावाला डेला, ऊँदीवखार, भावनगर-364 001

67. इंडियन बैंक

मस्कती मार्केट,

1552श्रीपाल भवन, खाड़िया चार रास्ता, गाँधी रोड,

अहमदाबाद -380 001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

68. इंडियन बैंक

नाराणपुरा , 5 नरसिंह पार्क सोसाइटी विजयनगर चार रास्ता नारायणपुरा अहमदाबाद-380 013 69. इंडियन बैंक

दावड़ा, जिला खेड़ा-387 350 70. इंडियन बैंक

पांचोट, जिला मेहसाणा-384 205 71. इंडियन बैंक

वलसाड, हालार रोड, वलसाड -396 001

72. इंडियन बैंक

पिपलग,

जिला खेड़ा-387 355 73. इंडियन बैंक

मोरबी, 7/1/27 , जेलरोड, मोरवी, 363 641 - जिला राजकोट 74. इंडियन बैंक

जामनगर, काशी विश्व नाथ रोड, जामनगर-361 001

75. इंडियन बैंक

राजकोट,

"तोराल", सुभाष रोड, राजकोट-360 001

76. इंडियन बैंक

कंजोड़ा, जिला खेड़ा-387 115 77. इंडियन बैंक

बड़ौदा,

प्रोफेसर माणिक राव रोड, रावपुरा, बड़ौदा-390 001

78. इंडियन बैंक

सचिन,

श्रीमहालक्ष्मी कॉम्पलेक्स, स्टेशन रोड, जिला सूरत -395 230

2785

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

79. इंडियन बैंक

वापी,

सी-5/47-70 जीआईडीसी,

सेलवास रोड, वापी, जिला वलसाड -396 195

80. इंडियन बैंक

पोरबंदर, कस्तूरबा गाँधी मार्ग,

माणिक चौक

पोरबन्दर, जिला जूनागढ़-360 575

81. इंडियन बैंक

आणंद,

5/8/14, स्टेशन रोड, आणंद, जिला खेड़ा-388 001

82. इंडियन बैंक

गाँधीनगर, ब्लॉक 316 , सेक्टर 16 , गाँधीनगर, अहमदाबाद-382 016

83. इंडियन बैंक सेवा शाखा,

19/20, नेशनल चैम्बर्स, आश्रम रोड,

अहमदाबाद-380 009

इंडियन बैंक

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-आंध्र प्रदेश

84. इंडियन बैंक हिलस्ट्रीट, 4-3-76/1-5 व 6 , हिलस्ट्रीट, रानीकुंज, सिकन्दराबाद-500 003

85. इंडियन बैंक

हिमायत नगर,

पो बॉ सं. 1010, 3-6-150, हिमायतनगर, हैदराबाद-500 029

86. इंडियन बैंक

उसमान गंज,

5-2-993/1 प्रथम तले,

निज़ाम शाही मार्ग , उस्मान गंज , हैदराबाद-500 195

87. इंडियन बैंक

लश्कर बाजार,

पे बॉ सं. 110 , 6-1-38 , लश्कर बाजार-506 001 वारंगल जिला 2786

88. इंडियन बैंक

दारूल शफा, 22-1-956, सुल्तानपुरा, सहीफा दारूल शफा, हैदराबाद-500 024

89. इंडियन बैंक

फलकनुमा,

19-3-1076 , शमशीर गंज, फलकनुमा, हैदराबाद-500 253

90. इंडियन बैंक

सेवा शाखा,

1-2-597/2 प्रथम तल, लोवर टैंक बंद रोड, दोमल गुड़ा,

हैदराबाद-500 029

91. इंडियन बैंक

मल्लापुरम, 4-42-3 ईएसआई अस्पताल के निकट, नचारम मेन रोड,

मल्लापुरम-501 507

92. इंडियन बैंक

बेगम बाजार, 15-6-211/4 बेगम बाजार, हैदराबाद-500 012

93. इंडियन बैंक

ब्राह्मणकोटकुर,

मेन रोड, ब्राह्मण कोटकुर, जिला करनूल-518432

94. इंडियन बैंक

नान्द्रद्याल, 428/2

श्रीनिवासनगर, नान्द्रद्याल, 518 501- जिला करनूल

95. इंडियन बैंक

काकतीय नगर, 9-4-84/11 काकतीय नगर, हैदराबाद-500 008

96. इंडियन बैंक

प्राथकोटा, जिला करनूल 518 412

97. इंडियन बैंक

खम्मम,

2-3-235 सुंदर टॉकीज रोड, खम्मम -507 003

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 98. इंडियन बैंक बरकतपुरा, 3-4-854, बरकतपुरा, हैदराबाद-500 027

99. इंडियन बैंक

श्रीनगर कॉलोनी, 127 श्रीनगर कॉलोनी रोड, हैदराबाद-500 073

100. इंडियन बैंक दिलसुख नगर, द्वार सं . 17/109 कमला नगर मेन रोड, दिलसुख नगर, हैदराबाद-500 066

101. इंडियन बैंक निजामाबाद, पोबॉ सं. 124, 7-1-62 गोडाउन रोड, निजामाबाद-503 001

102. इंडियन बैंक बेगमपेट,

6-3-852 रेड कॉर्टीज अमीरपेट, बेगमपेट,

हैदराबाद-500 016

103. इंडियन बैंक

नारायणंगुडा, 3-6-943/2ए, प्रथम तल नारायणगुंड़ा, हैदराबाद-500 029

104. इंडियन बैंक आसिफ नगर मेन रोड, आसिफ नगर, जिला करीमनगर 505 401

105. इंडियन बैंक

मोलंगूर,

शंकरपटनम मंडल,

जिला करीमनगर 505 470

106. इंडियन बैंक

सिर्नपल्ली,

जिला निजामाबाद -503 164

107. इंडियन बैंक पैड़िमाडुगु,

वाया रायकल, जिला करीमनगर -505 460 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

108. इंडियन बैंक

न्यूनल्लकुंटा, 2-2-1130-24/1 /ए/1 , शिवम रोड प्रशान्त नगर न्यूनल्लकुंटा, हैदराबाद-500 044 109. इंडियन बैंक

सिकन्दराबाद, पो बॉ सं. 1619 , 201 करन सेंटर, सरोजिनी देवी मार्ग, सिकंदराबाद, हैदराबाद-500 003

110. इंडियन बैंक

महबूबनगर, पो बॉ सं . 25, 2-2-123/18 , घण्टाघरमार्ग, महबूबनगर-509 001

111. इंडियन बैंक

हैदराबाद मुख्य, 5-1-679, सुरभि आर्केड, बैंकस्ट्रीट, हैदराबाद-500 001

112. इंडियन बैंक

करीमनगर, 3-5-404 गाँधी रोड, करीम नगर -505 001

113. इंडियन बैंक शिवमपेट, वाया तूपरन, जिला मेडक -502 334 राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-पंजाब

114. इंडियन बैंक

अमृतसर 42, चौक फ़रीद, कटरा शेर सिंह, अमृतसर-143 001

इंडियन बैंक

115.

आर्य समाज रोड, आर्य समाज भवन, आर्य समाज रोड, होशियारपुर-146 001

116. इंडियन बैंक

उधोवाल,

मुख्य बस स्टैंड, ग्राम एवं डाकघर उधोवाल, जिला- जालंधर -141 315 824 G1/03-7

2787

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

117. इंडियन बैंक एनआरआई गढ़शंकर रेलवे रोड, गढ़शंकर-144 527 जिला-होशियारपुर

118. इंडियन बैंक जालंधर, 922, जीटी रोड, जनरल बस स्टैंड के निकट, जालंधर-144 001

119. इंडियन बैंक जगराओं, रायकोट रोड, जगराओं -142 026 जिला-लुधियाना

120. इंडियन बैंक डुगरी, डाक घर- मॉडेल टाउन जिला-लुधियाना-141 002

121. इंडियन बैंक

कपूरथला, दिमाल, कपूरथला-146 601

इंडियन बैंक

122.

नूरपूर, ग्राम एवं डाक घर नूरपुर, तहसील नकोदर-141 310 जिला-जालंधर

123. इंडियन बैंक

भौरा , चौक जालंधर बाई पास, जीटी रोड, भौरा -141 005 जिला लुधियाना

124. इंडियन बैंक

फगवाड़ा,

जी टी रोड, फगवाड़ा-144 401 जिला-कपूरथला

125. इंडियन बैंक

पटियाला,

एसी बाज़ार के निकट, अदालत बाज़ार, पटियाला-147 001 2788

126. इंडियन बैंक

खन्ना, जीटी रोड ( पुराने बस स्टैंड के निकट ) , खन्ना-141 401 जिला-लुधियाना

127. इंडियन बैंक,

कालसीनगर,

1601, कालसीनगर, मुख्य जीटीरोड, धोलेवाल, लुधियाना-141 003

128. इंडियन बैंक

एनआरआई बांगा , संतबाबा सेवा सिंह चौक के निकट, चण्डीगढ़ मार्ग, बांगा-144505 जिला जालंधर

129. इंडियन बैंक

एन आर आई माहिलपुर नेशनलक्लॉथ हाउस , मुख्य चौक, बस अड्डा, माहिलपुर 146 105

130. इंडियन बैंक

तलवाड़ा, एससीएफ 10 - बी, सेक्टर-2 , तलवाड़ाटाउनशिप, 144 216 जिला-होशियारपुर

131. इंडियन बैंक नकोदर, 1941 , रेलवे रोड, नकोदर -141 310 जिला-जालंधर

132. इंडियन बैंक

नवांशहर दोआबा, रेलवे रोड, नवांशहर- दोआबा-144 514 जिला-जालंधर

133. इंडियन बैंक

नाभा, सिनेमा रोड, नाभा-147 201 जिला पटियाला

134. इंडियन बैंक

भटिंडा, गुरू काशी मार्ग, बस स्टैंड के निकट, भटिंडा-151 001

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 135. इंडियन बैंक

होशियारपुर,

एमसीएच 336 रोशनारा रोड, होशियारपुर-146 001

136. इंडियन बैंक मल्लियांखुर्द, तलवंडी सालेम, तहसील नकोदर-144 623 जिला जालंधर

137. इंडियन बैंक

रूपनगर, कलगीधर गुरूद्वारा के निकट, रूप नगर -141 001

138. इंडियन बैंक, मालड़ी ग्राम एवं डाक घर मालड़ी तहसील नकोदर-144 040 जिला जालंधर

139. इंडियन बैंक,

मोगा ढिल्लों भवन, जैदिका सर्विस , स्टेशन के सामने , जीटी रोड, मोगा-142 001

140. इंडियन बैंक, लुधियाना चौक, घण्टा घर, लुधियाना-141 008

141. इंडियन बैंक,

संगरूर धुरी गेट के बाहर, नैना देवी मन्दिर के सामने , संगरूर -148 001

142. इंडियन बैंक,

* मोहाली सेमी कंडक्टरकॉम्प्लेक्स, फेज 8 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मोहाली-160 059 जिला रोपड़

143. इंडियन बैंक,

मॉडल टाऊन गुरू नानक खालसा महिला कॉलेज, मॉडल टाऊन, गूजरखान कॉम्पलेक्स लुधियाना-141 002 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-दिल्ली

144. इंडियन बैंक, सेवाशाखा, 50-51 , रीगल भवन, संसदमार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110 001

145. इंडियन बैंक, राजौरी गार्डन, एफ-142, मेन मार्केट, राजौरी गार्डन , नई दिल्ली-110027

146. इंडियन बैंक, साकेत, 264बी/ 1 , हौज़रानी मार्केट, साकेत, नई दिल्ली-110 017

147. इंडियन बैंक, वेस्टपटेल नगर, 3/1 , वेस्ट पटेल नगर, नई दिल्ली-110 008

148. इंडियन बैंक, पदम सिंह रोड, 6/92, पदम सिंह रोड, करोलबाग , नई दिल्ली-110 005

149. इंडियन बैंक, मंडल कार्यालय , ऊपरी भूतल , वर्ल्ड ट्रेड सेन्टर , बाबर रोड, नई दिल्ली-110 001

150. इंडियन बैंक सेटफ्रांसिसडीसेल्स स्कूल , ए-3 ब्लॉक, लोकल शॉपिंग सेन्टर , जनकपुरी, नई दिल्ली-110 058

151. इंडियन बैंक , नई दिल्ली मुख्य, पी-45/90, कनॉट प्लेस , नई दिल्ली-110 001

152. इंडियन बैंक, ग्रेटर कैलाश, 13 , सामुदायिक केन्द्र, जमरुदपुर, ग्रेटर कैलाश- I , नई दिल्ली-110 048

2789

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15 , 1925

153. इंडियन बैंक, तिलक नगर, 31, ओल्डमार्केट, तिलक नगर, नई दिल्ली 110 018

154. इंडियन बैंक, सफदरजंग एन्क्लेव , एबी-20, सफदरजंग एनक्लेव , नई दिल्ली-110 029

155. इंडियन बैंक , डिफेन्सकॉलोनी, ए-261 , डिफेन्स कॉलोनी, नई दिल्ली-110 024

156. इंडियन बैंक, हौजखास, 106 व 107, अरविन्द प्लेस, डीडीए कमर्शियल कॉम्पलेक्स, नई दिल्ली-110 016

157. इंडियन बैंक, मयूर विहार, 33, प्रताप नगर , मयूरविहार, फेज़-1 , पटपड़गंज, नई दिल्ली-110 092

158. इंडियन बैंक , विकासपुरी, जी-27, डीडीए कमर्शियल सेन्टर, सोनिया सिनेमा के निकट, विकासपुरी, नई दिल्ली-110 018

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-बिहार

159. इंडियन बैंक , गरौल, ग्राम गरौल, डाकघर गरौल , 847 423 , बा रास्ता पुतई जिला दरभंगा

160. इंडियन बैंक , कुसैया, डाकघर कुसैया, बारास्ता किशनपुर, जिला समस्तीपुर-848 301

161. इंडियन बैंक, गया, गोलपाथर ठाकुर बाड़ी, बाड़ी, टेकरीमार्ग , गया-823 011 2790

162. इंडियन बैंक, नरवारा , डाकघर नरवारा-843 128, बारास्तामीनापुर, जिला सीतामढ़ी

163. इंडियन बैंक,

न्यूपाटलिपुत्र, अल्पना मार्केट, पटन-800 013

164. इंडियन बैंक, मुज़फ्फरपुर, पो. बॉ.सं. 71 , न्यूरोड, मोती झील , मुज़फ्फरपुर-842 001 165. इंडियन बैंक, मंडल कार्यालय, प्रथम तल, गोविन्द भवन, न्यूडाक बंगला रोड, पटना-800 001

166. इंडियन बैंक, बेली रोड, पन्त भवन, बेली रोड, पटना-800 008

167. इंडियन बैंक, बलुआ, डाकघर बलुआ, बलुआ हाई स्कूल, बारास्ता बलबनिया, ज़िला भोजपुर -802151 168. इंडियन बैंक, जिनोरिया, डाकघर खैरादीप , बारास्ता दाऊदनगर, जिला औरंगाबाद-824 114 राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-चंडीगढ़ 169. इंडियन बैंक, एनआरआई शाखा, एससीओ 48-49 , सेक्टर १ डी, मध्यमार्ग , चण्डीगढ़ -160 017

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 170. इंडियन बैंक, चंडीगढ़ मुख्य, एससीओ 38-39 , सेक्टर 7 सी, मध्यमार्ग, चण्डीगढ़ -160 019

मनीमाजरा, एससीओ 824 , एनएसी, शिवालिक एनक्लेव, 171. इंडियन बैंक, मनीमाजरा , चण्डीगढ़ -160 101

172. इंडियन बैंक, मंडल कार्यालय, पो. बॉ. सं. 739, एससीओ 189-192, सेक्टर 7 सी, चण्डीगढ़ -160 019

173. इंडियन बैंक, सेक्टर 34, एससीओ 132-133, सेक्टर 34ए, चण्डीगढ़ 160 017

174. इंडियन बैंक, सेक्टर 40, एससीओ 72-73 , सेक्टर 40 सी, चण्डीगढ़ -160 036

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-मध्य प्रदेश

175. इंडियन बैंक, देवास, 1बी, प्रथम तल, मोती बंगला, मेनरोड, देवास-455 001

176. इंडियन बैंक, रतलाम , पॉवर हाउस मार्ग, सैलाना बस स्टैंड के निकट, रतलाम -457 001

177. इंडियन बैंक,

बागेर, ब्लॉक-आष्टा, जिला सीहोर-446 116 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

178. इंडियन बैंक, उज्जैन, 137, नई सड़क, उज्जैन-456 001

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-हरियाणा 179. इंडियन बैंक , सिरसा, सेठ नानक चन्द तुले राम, झुंथरा ट्रस्ट भवन, हिसार रोड, सिरसा-125 055

180. इंडियन बैंक, पिंटो लाइन्स, वायु सेवा स्टेशन, जवाहरलाल नेहरू मार्ग , अम्बाला छावनी-133 001 181. इंडियन बैंक,

सेक्टर-22, मकान सं . 540, सेक्टर 22, फरीदाबाद-121 005

182. इंडियन बैंक, हिसार, एस सी एफ 20 , रेड स्क्वायर मार्केट, हिसार-125 001

183. इंडियन बैंक, पंचकूला, एस्टेट ऑफिस, सेक्टर-6 , पंचकूला-134 109

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-झारखंड 184. इंडियन बैंक,

सिलाडोल, ग्राम-रेवा, डाक घर- बिरहू-835 210 थाना-खूंटी, जिला-रांची

185. इंडियन बैंक,

जमशेदपुर, पो.बॉ. सं. 63, मेन रोड, बिस्तूपुर, एल आई सी भवन, जमशेदपुर-851 001

2791

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

186. इंडियन बैंक, रांची, सैनिक भवन, मेन रोड, रांची-834 001

187. इंडियन बैंक,

बोकारो स्टील सिटी, सी-27, सिटी सेन्टर, सेक्टर- IV, बोकारो स्टील सिटी, बोकारो-827 004

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-छत्तीसगढ़

188. इंडियन बैंक , भिलाई, प्लॉट सं . 6, " बी " मार्केट सेक्टर-6 , भिलाई, जिला-दुर्ग -490006

189. इंडियन बैंक, केदुवां, सरायपाली, केदुवां, जिला रायपुर, पिन-493 558

190. इंडियन बैंक, पेन्ड्रावन, पंचायती भवन पेन्ड्रावन , डाकघर सरसीवा, तहसील बिलाईगढ जिला रायपुर -493559

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-असम

191. इंडियन बैंक, हातीपुखुरी, जिला नागांव-782 125

राज्य/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र-राजस्थान

192. इंडियन बैंक,

भीलवाड़ा, जिनेन्द्र, 31 ए, मेन सेक्टर, शास्त्रीनगर, भीलवाड़ा-311 001 2792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10( 4 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित करवाने के लिए शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची

क्षेत्र-ग

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, अनकापल्ली शाखा, अनकापल्ली, जिला-विशाखापट्टणम, पिन-531 002

2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, वाडचिपुरूपल्ली शाखा, वाड़चिपुरूपल्ली, जिला-विशाखपट्टणम पिन-531 021

3. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, सालिग्रामपुरम शाखा, विशाखपट्टणम, जिला-विशाखपट‌णम , पिन-530024

4. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, सागरनगर शाखा, विशाखपट्टणम, जिला- विशाखपटणम, पिन-530043

5. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, श्रीहरिपुरम शाखा, विशाखपट्टणम, जिला-विशाखपट्टणम, पिन-530 011

6. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, भुबनेश्वर मुख्य शाखा, शहीदनगर, भुबनेश्वर पिन-751 007

7. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, श्रीकाकुलम शाखा, श्रीकाकुलम, जिला-श्रीकाकुलम, पिन-532001

8. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, अरण्डलपेट शाखा, गुंटूर,

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] जिला-गुंटूर, पिन-522 002

9. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, कोत्तपेट शाखा, गुंटूर जिला गुंटूर पिन-522 001

10. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, तेनालीशाखा, तेनाली, जिला-गुंटूर, पिन-522001

11. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, मेडिकोंडुरूशाखा, मेडिकोंडुरू, जिला-गुंटूर पिन-522438

12. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, सत्तेनापल्ली शाखा, सत्तेनपल्ली, जिला-गुंटूर पिन-522403

13. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, ए टी अग्रहारम शाखा, गुंटूर जिला-गुंटूर, पिन-522004

14. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, ताड़ेपल्लीगुड़ेम शाखा, ताड़ेपल्लीगुड़ेम, जिला- पश्चिम गोदावरी, पिन-534102

15: स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, लालागुडा शाखा, तारनाका हाई रोड, सिकंदराबाद-500 017

16. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, तारनाका शाखा, हुडा कांप्लेक्स, सिकंदराबाद-500 017

17. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, पी.जी. रोड शाखा, सिकंदराबाद -500 003 2793

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

18. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, विक्रमपुरी शाखा, सिकंदराबाद -500 009

19. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, माचा बोलारम शाखा, सिकंदराबाद-500 010

क्षेत्र-ख

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, रोजाबाग शाखा, मौलाना आजाद कालेज परिसर, नजदीक होटल ताज रेजिडेंसी, हसूल रोड, औरंगाबाद-431 003 महाराष्ट्र

2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , एम आई डी सी वालुज शाखा, प्लॉट नं. -139 , स्टर्लिंग इन्डस्ट्रीज के सामने वालुज, जिला औरंगाबाद, पिन-431 136 , महाराष्ट्र

3. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, कोल्हापुर शाखा, पूर्णिमा अपार्टमेंट, सी-वार्ड/सीएस -1429/ 4जी , लक्ष्मी पुरी , संभाजी ब्रिज रोड, कोल्हापुर -416 002

4. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, धनेगांव, सिडको शाखा,

नांदेड-431 160

भारत के राजपत्र में अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं की

सूची

ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स

दिल्लीक्षेत्र

1. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, 29/2, विजय एन्क्लेव, मेन पालम डाबड़ी रोड, द्वारका,

दिल्ली-110045

2. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, 3399 , महिन्द्रा पार्क चौक , रानी बाग ,

दिल्ली-110034

भटिण्डाक्षेत्र

3. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, अग्रणी बैंक कार्यालय , बगदादी गेट के बाहर, फिरोजपुर शहर -152002

4. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, शाखा कोट फतेह, ग्राम एवं डाकघर कोट फतेह , (जिला भठिण्डा) पिन-151 001

करनाल क्षेत्र

5. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, एम.एल.एन. कालेज, यमुनानगर, पिन-135001

6. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, 66 अनाज मंडी, कलायत, (जिला: कैथल) पिन-136 117

7. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, मेन बाजार, रादौर, (जिला यमुनानगर) , पिन-132 133

8. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , विस्तार पटल, लाल मैटरनिटी एण्ड जनरल हास्पिटल, आई.टी.आई. रोड, यमुनानगर

9. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , विस्तार पटल, ए.एस. सीनियर सेकण्डरी स्कूल, आर्य समाज चौक, अम्बाला शहर -133001

10. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, विस्तार पटल, हुडाकॉम्प्लेक्स, एस.सी.ओ. 63 , सेक्टर -8 , पंचकुला 2794

11. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , विस्तार पटल, पत्राचार पाठ्यक्रम निदेशालय , कुरूक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय , (जिला कुरूक्षेत्र ) पिन -136 119

12. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, विस्तार पटल , इंदर भान ( एल ) , भरतरी एजूकेशनल सोसायटी, जी.टी. रोड, पानीपत

देहरादून क्षेत्र

13. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, शाखा चन्दनकोली, (जिला सहारनपुर ) तहसील देवबन्द, पिन-247 554

14. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, 17, सकलानी मेंशन, राजपुर रोड देहरादून-248001

15. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, नेशनल इन्टर कालेज, ग्राम एवं डाकघर धनौरी , जिला हरिद्वार, पिन-249 401

16. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम व डाकघर गढ़ी अब्दुल्ला खां, जिला मुजफ्फरनगर, पिन-247 343

17. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम व डाकघर हलालपुर, जिला सहारनपुर, पिन-247 001

18. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफकॉमर्स, डाकघर : कनखल, जगजीतपुर, जिला हरिद्वार, पिन-249408

19. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, मर्दाना अस्पताल के सामने, जानसठ, जिला मुजफ्फरनगर पिन-249408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 20. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, डाकघर: मिश्रपुर ( कनखल) , हरिद्वार- लक्सर रोड जियापोता जिला हरिद्वार पिन-249408

21. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम व डाकघर काकड़ा जिला मुजफ्फरनगर पिन-251 318

22. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, जी.टी. रोड, खतौली जिला मुजफ्फरनगर पिन-251 201

23. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम व डाकघर : लिलौन शामली के पास जिला मुजफ्फर नगर पिन -247 776

24. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम व डाकघर : नगला कबीर तहसील: जानसठ जिला: मुजफ्फरनगर

25. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफकॉमर्स, मेन मार्किट न्यूटिहरी जिला टिहरी गढ़वाल पिन-249148

26. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम रामपुर, रामपुररोड डाकघर : रुड़की जिला हरिद्वार पिन-247667

27. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, लांघारोड ग्राम व डाकघर रुद्रपुर जिला देहरादून पिन-248197

28. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, हनुमान रोड शामली जिला मुजफ्फरनगर पिन-247776 2795

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

in the attached annexure , more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :-

Name of the Banks

29. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , पेपर मिल रोड शेखपुरा कदीम जिला सहारनपुर पिन-247001

Number of Offices/ Branches

SI . No.

1. State Bank ofMysore

2. State Bank of India 218 30. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम शेरपुर खानाजादपुर डाकघर छुटमलपुर जिला सहारनपुर पिन-247662

3. Bank of Maharastra 28

4. Union Bank of India 03

5. VijayaBank 183

6. Panjab National Bank 43 31. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, कुमारटावर बी.एच.ई.एल. रोड रानीपुरमोड़ डाकघर ज्वालापुर हरिद्वार-249407

7 . State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur 03

8. Syndicate Bank 149

9. Central Bank of India 79

10 . Andhra Bank

32. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , चिलकाना मोड़ अम्बाला रोड, सरसावा जिला सहारनपुर पिन-247232

11. Small Industry Development Bank of India

12. Corporation Bank 09 33. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, कोर्ट रोड उत्तरकाशी ( जिला उत्तरकाशी ) पिन-249193

13. Indian Bank 192

14. State Bank of Hyderabad

15. Oriental Bank of Commerce 36 34. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, कोटा गांव देवबन्द रोड, जिला सहारनपुर पिन-247551

1021

Total

[F.No.11016/1/2003 -Hindi ] 35. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, छोटी शरीफगंज जिला मुजफ्फरपुर बिहार-842001

REMESH BABU ANIYERY , Dy . Director (OL)

STATE BANK OF MYSORE 36. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, वर्मा सेन्टर पहली मंजिल बोरिंग रोड पटना-800001

HeadOffice

New Delhi , the 26th March, 2003.

Kempegowda Road , P.B.No.9727

S.O. 1072. In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use ofOfficial Purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government , hereby , notifies the listed offices /branches of the following banks

Bangalore- 560009 . Karnataka 824G1/03-8 2796

MUZAFFARPUR DIST NAME OF BRANCHES

State Bank of India

1. Zonal Office

P. O. Ramna

Pin-842002

2. Muzaffarpur Branch

Pin-842001

3. ADB Muzaffarpur

Pin-842001

4. AMY Ahiyapur

Pin-842001

5. AD.B

Saraiya

Pin-843126

6. Aurai

Pin-843312

7. Bela Industrial Estate Pin-842002

8. Bihar University Campus Pin-842002

9. Chandwara

Pin-842002

10. Club Road

Pin-842002

11. Gola Road

Pin-842001

12. Jainthpur

Pin-843123

13. Kalyani Market

Pin-842001

14. Kanta

P.O.Piraunchha

15. Kanti

Pin-843109

16. Kanti Thermal Power Station Muzaffarpur 843109

17. M.I.T Muzaffarpur

Pin-842003

18. Sutapatti Pin-842001

19. Rupauli

Dist.-Muzaffarpur

20. Mithanpura

Pin-842002

SAMASTIPUR DISTT .

21. A.D.B.

Dalsincsarai

Pin-848205

22. A.D.B.

Hasanpur Road

Pin-848205

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 23. A.D.B. Samastipur

Pin-848101

24. Bibhutipur Dist- Samastipur

Pin-848211

25. Angarhat Pin-838212

26. Bithan Via-Hasanpur Road

Dist- Samastipur

27. A. M. Y. Mathurapur

Dist-Samastipur

Pin-848101

28. Hasanpur Road

Pin-848206

29. Kalyanpur Dist- Samastipur

30. Kishanpur

Pin-848301

31. Mangalgarh

Dist- Samastipur

32. A.M.Y. Mathurapur

Pin-848101

33. Mushrigharari

Pin-848101

34. Patori

Pin-848504

35. Rosera

Pin-848210

36. Samastipur Pin-848101

37. Samastipur Bazar

Pin-848101

38. Singhia Pin-848209

39. Tajpur Morwa Pin-848121

40. Ujiarpur Dist- Samastipur

Pin-848132

41. Vidyapathinagar Dist- Samastipur

EAST-CHAMPARAN

42. A.D.B. Motihari Pin-845401

43. A.D.B. Ramcarhwa

44. Areraj Dist-Champaran East

45. Barachakia Pin-845412

46. Chiraiya Pin-845415 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

47. Harsdhi

Pin-845422

48. Kalyanpur

Dist-Champaran -East 49. Kesaria

Pin-845424

50. Madhuban

Pin-845104

51. Malahi Bazar

Pin-845425

52. Mehsi

Pin-845428

53. Paharpur

Dist-Champaran-East 54. Pakridayal

Pin-845428

55. Patahi

Pin-845457

56. Pipra

P.O. Damodarpur Dist-Champaran-East 57. Raxaul

Pin-845305

58. Turkauilia

Dist-Champaran -East 59. Bokanakalan

VIA-Patahi

Champaran -East

60. Chintamanpur (S. A. B ) Champaran- East 61. Dudhiawa sareya Dist-Champaran-East 62. Motihari

Pin-845401

63. Motihari Bazar

Pin-845401

64. Narkatia

Dist-Champaran-East 65. Ekdari

P.O. Chaurdana

Pin-845302

66. Kathan

Dist-Champaran-East 67. Mahuawa

Dist-Champaran -East 68. Purnahia

Dist-Champaran-East 69. Ruphara

Dist-Champaran -East 70. Salaempur

Champaran-East

2797

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

71. Sapahi

Champaran-East

72. Sitalpur

Pin-845412

73. Darmaha

Dist-Champaran-East

74. Nimueya

Dist-Champaran -East

75. Saraiya Pipra ( S.A.B)

Dist-Champaran-East

76. Dhaka

Dist-Champaran-East

77. Phulwaria ojha

Dist-Champaran-East

78. Ibrahimpur

Dist-Champaran -East

79. Bariadih

Dist-Champaran -East

80. Shyampur Bazar (AREA)

Dist-Champaran-East

SARAN DISTRICT

81. A. D. B Chapra

Pin-841401

82. A. D. B. Parsa

Pin-841219

83, A. D. B.

Taraiya

84. Α.Μ.Υ.

Sarha

85. Anjani

P. O. Fulwaria

86. Amnaur

Pin-841401

87. Chainpur

P. O. Mashrak

Pin-841401

88. Chapra

Pin-841301

89. Chapra Bazar

Pin-841301

90. Ekma

Pin-841208

91. Marhowrah

Pin-841518

92. Mohammadpur

Pin-841223

93. Nagra

Pin-841442

94. Nayagaon

Pin-841217

95. Parmanandpur

Dist-Saran 2798

96. Rajendra College Campus Chapra-Pin-841301

97. Sahajupur Dist-Saran

98.

Dist- Saran Shamkauriya

99. Sitalpur Pin-841221

100. Sutihar Dist-Saran

101. Tajpur

P. O. Fulwaria

Dist- Saran

SIWAN - DISTRICT 102. A.D.B. Mairwa Pin-841229

103. A.D.B.Siwan Pin-841226

104. Gopai Pur P.O. Bakargang

Pin-841286

105. Mahrajgang

Pin-841223

106. Mairwa

Pin-841229

107. Patar

Dist- Siwan

108. Raghunathpur

Pin841506

109. Siwan

Pin-841226

110. Siwan Bar

Pin-84125

111. Ziradei

Pin-841245

VAISHALF- DISTRICT 112. A.D.B.Hajipur

Pin-844101

113. Dabhaich

Dist-Vaishali

114. Desari

Pin-844504

115. Goroul

Pin-844118

116. Hajipur Pin-844101

117. Harauli ( S.A.B) Dist- Vaishali

118. Lalgang Pin-844121

119. Mahnar

Pin-844101

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 120. Malpur DistVaishali

121. Sumergang P.O.Salempur Dumaria Pin-844122

DistVaishali DARBHANGA- DISTT.

122. A.D.Bhfnipur Pin-847103

123. Bandhauli

P.O.Jalley

Pin-847302

124. Benipur Pin-847103

125. Darbhanga Pin-846001

126. Darbhanga City Pin-846304

127. Darbhanga Medical College Campus-846003

128. Ghanshyampur VIA Kurso Nadiami

Pin-847405

129. Hanti Dist-Darbhanga

130. Kadirabad Dist-Darbhanga

131. K.S.D.S.U. Campus

Pin846004

132. Kamtaul P.O.Kamtaul Pin-847034

133. Kumrauli

P.O.Kamtaul Dist-Darbhanga

134. Laheria Sarai Pin-846001

135. Manigachi Dist-Darbhanga

136. Sahasram ( S.A.B.) Dist-Darbhanga

137. Sakri Pin-847239

138. A. M. Y. Shivdhara

Dist-Darbhanga

139. Supaul Bazar Dist-Darbhanga MADHUBANI DISTRICT

140. A. D. B. Basopatti Pin-847225

141. A.D.B.

Madhubani [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

142. Anrer Dist-Madhubani 143. Bhagwatipur Dist-Madhubani 144. Jaynagar Pin-843226

145. Jhanjharpur Pin-847404

Kaluahi

146.

Pin-847229

147.. Khajauli Pin-847228

148. Loukaha Pin-047421

Madhubani

149.

Pin-847211

150. Rahika

Dist-Madhubani Sakri Bazar

151.

P.O. Sakri

Dist-Madhubani SITAMARHI DistRICT 152. A.D.B. Parihar

A.D.B. Sitamarhi 153.

Pin-843301

154. Bairgania Pin-843313

155. Belsand Pin-843516

Chakauti

156.

Dist-Sitamarhi

Dostia

157.

Dist-Sitamarhi 158. Harari Dularpur Via-Sursand

Pin-843337

Jagdhar

159.

Pin-844324

Janakpur Road 160.

Pin-843320

Madhuban Basaha 161.

P.O. Madurapur Α.Μ.Υ. Mehsol 162.

Sitamarhi

163. Sitamarhi

Pin-843202

164. Sitamarhi

Pin-843301

GOPALGANJ DistRICT A.D.B. Gopalgang 165.

Pin-841428

2799

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15 , 1925

166. Dahibhat Dist-Gopalgang

167. Gopalgang Pin-841428

168. Hathua Pin-841436

169. Kateya

Pin-841437

170. Koelandeva Dist-Gopalgang

171. Majirwankala

P.O. Radhaganj Bazar

172. Mirgang Pin-841834

173. Sagamusa

Dist-Gopalganj

174. Sidhwalia

Pin-841423

175. Naraniya Pin-841438

CHAMPARAN- WEST

A.D.B. Bettiah

176.

Pin-845438

A.D.B.

177.

Ramnagar

Pin-845106

A.M.Y.Shikarpur

178.

Narkatiacanc

179. Α.Μ.Υ. Tiklia, (Chanpatia)

180. Bagaha Pin-845101

181. Bagaha Bazar Pin-845101

182. Bettiah Pin-845438

183. Bhawal Dist- Champaranwest

184. Chanpaha Pin-845449

185. Gahiri Dist-Champaran-West

186. Gaunaha Pin-845102

187. Harinagar Pin-845103

188. Lauria Pin-845438

Maina Tand

189.

WEST CAMPARAN

Dist

190. Narkatiaganj Dist-West Champaran 2800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

191. Paraspakri P.O. Chanayanba

192. Sahadatpur (S.A.B) Dist-West Champaran

193. SiktaBazar Pin-835307

194. Tola Malahi P.O.Balo Rampur

Pin-845438

195. Valmikinagar Pin-835107

196. Madhubani DistWest Champaran

197. Phulwaria Dist-West Champaran

State Bank of India Corporate Centre Mumbai

List of Branches/Offices to be notified under Rule 10 (4) of the Official Language Rules 1976 198. State Bank of India

Zonal Office

State Bank Bhavan, Mahatma ; Gandhi Road, Panaji , Goa-403 001

199. State Bank of India

Kotwali Bazar Branch, Kotwali Bazar Dist. Kangra, Dharamshala- 176215 (Himachal Pradesh)

200. State Bank of India

Mandi Bmach Mandi - 175001 (Himachal Pradesh)

201. State Bank of India Commercial Branch 23 , Najafgarh Road, New Delhi

202 State Bank of India

Prashant Vihar 67, T Block, Central Market, Prashant Vihar, Delhi - 110085

203. State Bank of India

HodalBranch

2675, Hasanpur Road, Hodal, Dist Faridabad, Faridabad-6

204. State Bank of India

Rajghat Branch Rajghat Power House, Ring Road, New Delhi 110 002

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] 205. State Bank of India Service Branch 1, Convent Road , Deharudun

206. State Bank of India Personal Banking Branch Vasant Vihar, Deharadun

207. State Bank of India

Karauli Branch Satyavati Vihar Karauli

208. State Bank of India

Personal Banking Branch 104/4, Madhyam Marg Mansarover , Jaipur

209. State Bank of India Personal Banking Branch Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur

210. State Bank of India

Chandpol Branch 1190/1191 , Uniaron Ka Rasta Chandpol Bazar , Jaipur- 302001

211. State Bank of India

ITC Saharanpur Branch SardarPatel Marg ,

Saharanpur- 1

212. State Bank of India

Personal Banking Branch C-23 , Sector - 26, Noida - 1 Uttar Pradesh

213. State Bank of India New Shahganj Branch New Shaganj , Dist .Agra -282 010, Uttar Pradesh

214. State Bank of India Dabrai Branch Collectorate Compound Dabrai , Dist . Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh

215. State Bank of India Kamla Nagar Branch Kamla Nagar , Agra, Uttar Pradesh

216. State Bank of India 509, Army base Workshop Br . 509, Army Base, Agra, UttarPradesh

217. State Bank of India Commercial Branch Vardhaman Trade Centre, Nehru Place, New Delhi - 110019

218. Staff Training Centre State Bank of India Harvilas Marg, Civil Lines Ajmer 305001 (Rajasthan) 2801

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA "B" Region

Pune City Region

Bank of Maharashtra

1. Bhusari Colony Pune Branch Bank ofMaharashtra Plot No. 5/1 , Survey No.94/4 Bhusari Colony, Paud Road Kothrud, Pune 411029 ( Maharashtra) 2. Lullanagar Pune Branch

Bank ofMaharashtra

Shop No.9/B , Alied Heights 17/2 Lullanagar , Kondhwe Khurd Pune 411 048 (Maharashtra)

3. Kalyaninagar Pune Branch

Bank of Maharashtra Florina Estate 16/1 , Kalyaninagar Pune 411014 (Maharashtra)

Akola Region

4. Shivaji College Akola Branch Bank of Maharashtra

Shivaji Arts, Commerce , Science College Akola 444001 (Maharashtra)

Ratnagiri Region

5. Kuvarbav Branch

Bank of Maharashtra

516 , Matruchhaya , Kuvarbav Distt. Ratnagiri 415 639 (Maharashtra) 6. Vatad Khandala Branch

Bank of Maharashtra PawarBhavan

Vatad Khandala 415 613 (Maharashtra) ThaneRegion

7. Thane Municipal Corp. Branch Bank of Maharashtra

Thane Municipal Corp. Building Ground Floor, Panchpakhadi Thane 400 602 (Maharashtra) 8. Bhayandar Branch

Bank of Maharashtra Onkar Towers , First Floor B.P.Road Bhayandar (East) Distt. Thane 401 105 (Maharashtra) Jalgaon Region

9. Ganpatinagar Jalgaon Branch Bank of Maharashtra

Shama Complex, S. Milwani Road Ganpatinagar, Jalgaon 425002 (Maharashtra) KolhapurRegion

10. Tararani Vidyapeeth Kolhapur Branch

Bank of Maharashtra First Lane, Rajarampuri , EWard Kolhapur 416 008 (Maharashtra)

Mumbai Suburb Region

も

11. Oshiwara Mumbai Branch

Bank of Maharashtra

M/s . Oberoi Chambers , Off New Link Rd. Oshiwara, Andheri (West ) Mumbai 400 053 (Maharashtra)

12. Kannamwargram Mumbai Branch

Bank ofMaharashtra Vikas High School Kannamwargram, Vikroli (East ) Mumbai 400 083 (Maharashtra)

Mumbai City Region

13. Personal Banking Br . Mumbai

Bank ofMaharashtra Kangara Mitra Mandal Coop. Society Ltd. 231 , Dr. A. B. Road, Worli Mumbai 400 025 (Maharashtra)

Aurangabad Region

14. Service Branch Aurangabad

Bank ofMaharashtra 5655, Anjali Complex, First Floor, Khadkeshwar Aurangabad 431 001 (Maharashtra)

15. Jawaharlal Nehru Eng . College Aurangabad Bank ofMaharashtra MAM Campus , No. 5 SIDCO Aurangabad 431 003 (Maharashtra)

LaturRegion

16. Sarafa Holi Branch Bank ofMaharashtra House No. 4-1-292 , Aher Building Opp.Renuka MataMandir Sarafa Holi , M. G. Road Nanded 431 602 (Maharashtra)

Ahmednagar Region

17. Dashmeshnagar Shrirampur Branch Bank of Maharashtra Bismilla Manzil, Dharmweer Chouk CD Jain College Rd . Dashmeshnagar Shrirampur 413 709 (Maharashtra )

Solapur Region

18. Civil Hospital Solapur Branch Bank ofMaharashtra CivilHospital Compound Solapur 413 003 (Maharashtra) 2802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

Ahmedabad Region

19. Junagad Branch Bank of Maharashtra FirstFloor, Gift Palace Apartment Ranavav Chouk Junagad 362 001 (Gujrat)

Delhi Region

20. Patiala Branch

Bank of Maharashtra 6. Leela Bhawan Market Patiala 137 001 (Punjab)

Bank of Maharashtra

(C.O. Lokmangal , 1501 , Shivajinagar, Pune -5) "A" Region

Delhi Region

21. Hisar Branch

Bank of Maharashtra 106 , Green Square Market Hisar 125 001 (Haryana)

22. Noida Branch

Bank of Maharashtra A 307 , Sector- 19 Noida 201 301 (U. P.)

23. Ajmer Branch

Bank ofMaharashtra 12, Ram Bharose Bhavan Opp . GPO, Prithviraj Road Ajmer 305 001 (Rajsthan)

24. Simla Branch

Bank of Maharashtra Bharadwaj Niwas Opp. Community Center Sector 11 , Lane - 1 Simla 171 009 (Himachal Pradesh )

Indore Region

25. Scheme 54 Vijaynagar Branch Bank of Maharashtra 51. Vijaynagar Scheme No. 54 Agra -Mumbai Road , Indore 452 008 (Madhya Pradesh)

Bhopal Region

26. Arera Colony Branch Bank of Maharashtra E-2/ 17 . Arera Complex Habibganj Railway Station Bhopal 462016 ( Madhya Pradesh)

27. City Center Branch Gwalior

Bank of Maharashtra B- 11 , Patel Nagar, City Center Gwalior 474 011 (Madhya Pradesh)

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] KolkataRegion

28. Ranchi Branch

Bank of Maharastra

Shop No. 115/116 Ranchi Club Complex MainRoad, Ranchi 834001 (Bihar)

UNION BANK OF INDIA

Official Language Department , Central Office , Mumbai Branches/Offices recommended for notification under Official Language Rule 10(4) Name of the Regional Office-Regional Office, Bhuvneshwar

Name & Address of the Branch

1. Union Bank of India

Balasore Branch Vivekanand Marg Balasore - 756001 Orissa

2. Union Bank of India

Panchugochhia Branch At. Panchugochhia Post-Mugupur Via - Fakirpur Distt. Keonjhar- 754 142 Orissa.

3. Union Bank of India

TalpadarBranch Post-Talpadar via Ghess Distt. Bargarh -768 034 Orissa.

1. Chamrajnagar , Mysore (1043) Vijaya Bank, P. B. No. 1 GirishComplex Agrahara Street Chamrajnagar , Mysore Dist . 571313

2. Hassan ( 1079) VijayaBank P. B. No. 46 Roman Catholic Church Compound Holenarsapur Road Hassan573 201

3. Hunsur ( 1091 ) VijayaBank BahusarNilaya DoorNo. 1463 S. J. Road , Hunsur Mysore Dist . 571 105

4. Industrial Suburb

Mysore ( 1092) VijayaBank 55 /A IST Stage Industrial Suburb Vishveshwar Nagar Mysore 570 008 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2803

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

14. Gokulam Mysore (1314)

5. Kollegal (1123 )

VijayaBank

415, Cantour Road

Gokulam, 3rd Stage

Mysore 570 002

P. B. No. 11 I/324 H, Peace Park Road Kollegal Mysore Dist . 571 440

15. S. R. Road, Mysore (1334)

6. K. R. Pet ( 1128)

VijayaBank

Hotel Sriram Bldg.

Sayaji Rao Road

Mysore 570 021

VijayaBank Aruna Complex Main Road , K. R. Pet Mandya Dist . 571 426

16. Ravindranagar ( 1339 )

VijayaBank

7. Maddur (1134) VijayaBank P. B. No. 6 HotelGajanan Bldg. Ist Floor, Main Road Maddur Mandya Dist . 571 428

P. B. No. 60 Sri Adi Chunchangiri Commercial Centre Bldg. Ravindranagar Hassan 573 201

17. Gundlupet ( 1344)

8. Malavalli ( 1138)

VijayaBank

OldHospital Road

Gundlupet

Mysore Dist . 571 111

VijayaBank P. B. No. 10 MysoreRoad Malavalli Mandya Dist . 571 430

18. K. R. Nagar ( 1345 )

9. Mandya( 1141)

VijayaBank

4-8, 7th Cross

Krishnarajnagar

Mysore Dist . 571 602

VijayaBank P. B. No. 18 1119 M. C. Road Mandya 571401

19. Nazarbad ( 1354 )

10. Mandi Mohalla , Mysore (1142) VijayaBank, Shalimar House Mandi Mohalla, Tilaknagar Mysore 570 015

11. Nanjangud ( 1158) VijayaBank

P. B. No. 8 Door No. 1140/1173 Bazaar Street Nanjangud Mysore Dist . 571 301

VijayaBank No. 73 , Ist Floor Madhvesha Shopping Complex Nazarbad Main Road Mysore570 010

20. Muda ( 1385)

VijayaBank, Mysore Urban Dev . Authority J.L.B. Road Mysore 570 005

21. Vijaya Bank

Regional Office (9115) P. B. No. 11 NearKR Circle Santhepet Mysore 570 001

22. Divisional Accounts Office,

Mysore(9210)

12. Santhepet, Mysore ( 1191), VijayaBank, P. B. No. 31 . Devaraj URS Road Santhepet, Mysore 570 001

13. N. S. Puram , Mysore ( 1296) VijayaBank,

756, New Kantharaja, URS Rd. Kuvempu Nagar Mysore 570 009

824G1/03-9

VijayaBank No.45, D. Devaraj URS Road Near K. R. Circle Santhepet Mysore 570 001 2804

23. Vijaya Bank

Currency Chesh ( 9612) 415, Contour IMain Road, Gokulam III Stage Mysore570002

24. Regional Office, Kochi (9127) VijayaBank, IstFloor, Jose Annexe Jose Junction M. G. Road Kochi , Ernakulam 682 016 25. Adugodi ( 1001) VijayaBank No. 29 , Hosur Main Road P. B. No. 8227 Adugodi , Bangalore 560 030

26. Banashankari ( 1020) VijayaBank No. 39011 , 40th Cross Banashankari 8thBlock Jayanagar Bangalore 560 082

27. Brigade Road (1038 ) VijayaBank Ist Floor , Nilgiri's Bldg . BrigadeRoad Bangalore 560 001

28. Byatarayanapura ( 1040) VijayaBank Agricultural Credit Co-Op. Society Bldg . B'lore-Bellary Road Byatarayanapura Bangalore 560 092

29. Channapatna ( 1044) VijayaBank ChayaMarket M. G. Road Channapatana Bangalore Dist . 571 501 30. Dabaspet ( 1049) VijayaBank Dabaspet Nelamangala Taluk Bangalore Dist . 562 111 31. Dasarahalli ( 1054) VijayaBank UppalTowers Tumkur Road Dasarahalli Bangalore 560 057

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 32. Doddaballapur ( 1060 )

VijayaBank IstFloor Lakshmi Comlplex MainRoad Doddaballalpur Bangalore Dist . 561 203

33. Domlur( 1061)

VijayaBank

No. 301 , 7th Cross DomlurLayout Bangalore 560 071

34. Ganganagar (1065)

1 VijayaBank No. 19/10, Ist Main Road Ganganagar Layout Bangalore 560 032

35. Geddalhalli ( 1066) VijayaBank Rajmahal Vilas Extn. II Stage , Sanjaynagar Bangalore 560 094

36. Hanumanthnagar ( 1076)

VijayaBank

'Aloka' No. 25, III Main Road Hanumanthnagar Bangalore 560 019

37. Infantry Road ( 1093 )

VijayaBank 23/24, Infantry Road Bangalore 560 001

38. Jayanagar ( 1096) Vijaya Bank P. B. No. 1124, No. 18, 11th Main 27th Cross, 3rd Block ( East ) Jayanagar Bangalore 560 011

39. Cox Town (1097)

VijayaBank 35, Ist Floor Tambu Chetty Road CoxTown Bangalore 560 005

40. J. C. Road ( 1100 )

VijayaBank

P. B. No. 6697 No. 14 , J. C. Road Bangalore 560 002 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

41. Kanakapura ( 1107) VijayaBank 11/10, R. E. S. Complex IstFloor M. G. Road Kanakapura Bangalore 562 117

42. K. G. Road ( 1118) VijayaBank P. B. No. 9934 No. 34 , Ist Floor HariramComplex K. G. Road Bangalore 560 009

43. Kolar ( 1121 ) VijayaBank P. B. No. 19 M. B. Road Near Pallavi Talkies Kolar563 101

44. Magadi (1135) VijayaBank No. 735/663 & 842/1147 Ramaraja URS Road Magadi B'lore Rural Dist. 562 120 45. Malleshwaram ( 1139) VijayaBank P. B. No. 310 352. Sampige Road Malleshwaram Bangalore 560 003

46. Mayo Hall (1146) Vijaya Bank P. B. No. 5118 Public Utility Bldg. Mayo Hall , M.G. Road Bangalore 560 001

47. Mysore Road ( 1153 ) VijayaBank No. 95/1 , Mysore Road Bangalore 560 018 48. Nagappa Block ( 1155) VijayaBank No. 1613/31 , K.B.G. Extn. NagappaBlock Srirampuram Bangalore 560 021 49. Narasapur ( 1159) VijayaBank Narasapur Kolar Dist . 563 133

2805

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15 , 1925

50. Nelamangala (1161) VijayaBank 'Dwaraka Plaza ' No. 124, B.H. Road Nelamangala Bangalore Dist 562 123

51. Peenya ( 1173) VijayaBank 3/1 A, Sri Munishwara Estate Tumkur Road Peenya Bangalore 560 058

52. R. C. Road ( 1178) VijayaBank P. B. No. 5099 Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan Bldg . Race Course Road Bangalore 560 001

53. Rajajinagar ( 1179) VijayaBank P. B. No. 1022 No. 367 , V Block, 65th Cross Rajajinagar Bangalore 560 0 10

54. Ramnagaram ( 1180) VijayaBank P. B. No. 12 Court Road, M.G. Road Ramnagaram Bangalore Dist 571 511

55. Residency Road ( 1184) VijayaBank P. B. No. 2555 2-A, Residency Road Bangalore 560 025

56. Sankey Road (1189) VijayaBank 19, Sankey Road Bangalore 560 020

57. Shanthinagar ( 1193 ) VijayaBank P. B. No. 2 No. 29 , K. H. Road Shanthinagar Bangalore 560 027

58. West of Chord Road ( 1201 ) VijayaBank No. 12 , Ist Main Road II Stage, West of Chord Rd . Mahalaxmipuram Bangalore 560 086 2806

59. South End Road( 1202) VijayaBank South End Road Basavanagudi Bangalore 560 004

60. Tumkur (1209) VijayaBank B. H. Road Tumkur 572 101

61. Ulsoor ( 1216) VijayaBank 151/2 , Old Madras Road Ulsoor Bangalore 560 008

62. Vani Vilsa Road ( 1217) VijayaBank P. B. No. 431 No. 2 , Vani Vilas Road Basavanagudi Bangalore 560 004

63. Vidyanagar( 1218 ) VijayaBank Vidyanagar Bangalore North Taluk Bangalore Dist 562 157 64. Vijayanagar ( 1220 )

VijayaBank 1019 -A, III Main Road Vijayanagar Bangalore 560 040

65. Yeshwanthpur ( 1228 ) ^ VijayaBank Subedarpalyam Road Yeshwanthpur Bangalore 560 022

66. Devarayasamudra ( 1233) VijayaBank Devarayasamudra Mulbagal Taluk Kolar Dist. 563 127

67. Bannerghatta ( 1245) VijayaBank Bannerghatta Bangalore 560 083

68. City Market ( 1248) VijayaBank P. B. No. 6692 No. 72, Gundopanth Street Bangalore 560 002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 69. Venkatapura ( 1260)

VijayaBank WoolWeaverCo -Op . SocietyBuilding HindupurRoad Venkatapura Pavagada Taluk Tumkur Dist. 561 216

70. Gandhi Bazaar ( 1261) VijayaBank P. B. No. 433 106, Gandhi Bazaar Main Rd. Basavanagudi Bangalore 560 004

71. Halevoor ( 1267) VijayaBank Amruthoor Main Road Huliyurdurga, Halevoor Kunigal Taluk Tumkur Dist 572 123

72. Chikkaballapur ( 1276)

VijayaBank P. B. No. 12 BazaarRoad Chikkaballapur KolarDist 562 101

73. Tekkal ( 1279) VijayaBańk NearRailway Station Tekkal Malur Taluk Kolar Dist. 563 137

74. N. R. Road ( 1285 )

No. 1 , III Cross , Naz Complex

VijayaBank Narasimharaja Road Bangalore 560 002

75. Palace Orchards ( 1286)

VijayaBank 344/8 , Upper palace Orchards Bangalore 560 080

76. Siddaganga Mutt ( 1289) VijayaBank No. 50 , Prafulla Bhavan Silver Jubilee Building Siddaganga Mutt Tumkur Dist . 572 104

77. Whitefield ( 1292)

VijayaBank 105 , Main Road Whitefield Bangalore 560 066 [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

78. Tirumani (1295)

VijayaBank Near Bus Stand Tirumani PavagadaTaluk Tumkur Dist 572 172

79. Indiranagar ( 1301) VijayaBank 325, Chinmaya Mission HospitalRoad, Indiranagar Bangalore 560 038

80. Sarakki ( 1304)

VijayaBank 147, 4th Cross Near Shivbalayogi Ashram J. P. Nagar (Sarakki) III Phase Bangalore 560 078

81. Gunjur ( 1305)

VijayaBank

ViaVarthur Bangalore South Tq . Bangalore Dist . 560 087 82. Tiptur ( 1324)

VijayaBank Jayadeva Complex FirstFloor Railway Station Road Tiptur Tumkur Dist . 572 201 83. Krishnarajpuram (1326) VijayaBank

OldMadras Road Krishnarajpuram Bangalore 560 036

84. Trinity Circle ( 1331 ) Vijaya Bank Shrutha Complex No. 19 , Primrose Road OffM.G. Road Bangalore 560 025

85. Chickpet (1332)

Vijaya Bank

RajathaComplex II Floor , OTC Road Chickpet Bangalore 560 053

86. Moodlupalya ( 1333) VijayaBank

Pradeep Complex 42, Nagarbhavi Road Moodlupałya Bangalore 560 072

2807

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

87. Jalahalli (1337)

VijayaBank

Jayashanker Vilas MES Road

Jalahalli

Bangalore 560013

88. Madhugiri (1341 )

VijayaBank

502, Near Bus Stand Madhugiri Tumkur Dist . 572 132

89. Gauribidnur ( 1342)

VijayaBank

Esturi Complex

Railway Station Road Gauribidnur

KolarDist 561 208

90. H. A. L. III Stage ( 1348)

VijayaBank

No. 424, New Thippasandra Road

H. A. L. III Stage

Bangalore 560 008

91. Ujjani (1352)

VijayaBank

CarStreet, Ujjani Huliyurdurga Hobli Kunigal Taluk Tumkur Dist. 572 123

92. Bugudanhalli ( 1355 )

VijayaBank

Bugudanhalli

Tumkur Taluk

Tumkur Dist. 572 102

93. Goni Tumkur (1356)

VijayaBank

Goni Tumkur

Turuvekere Taluk

Tumkur Dist . 572 227

94. Hosur (1359 )

VijayaBank

Hosur

Via Shanivara Santhe Yeslur Hobli, Sakleshpur Taluk Hassan Dist . 571235

95. Tirumale (1360)

VijayaBank

.5, TempleRoad

Tirumale

Magadi Taluk Bangalore Rural Dist . 563 230 2808

6. Muddenhalli ( 1367)

VijayaBank

Muddenhalli

Chickballapur Taluk

KolarDist 562 101

97. Chikkakunthur ( 1371 )

VijayaBank

Chikkakunthur

MalurTaluk

Kolar Dist. 563 130

98. Yelhanka( 1380)

VijayaBank

FirstFloor

K. H. B. Shopping Complex No. 3 , Main Road

New Township,

Yelhanka

Bangalore 560 064

99. Hoskote ( 1384)

VijayaBank

Site No. 2241

J. C. Circle

Hoskote

BangaloreRural

Dist . 562 114

100. A. R. M. B. ( 1387)

VijayaBank

2-A, ResidencyRoad

Bangalore 560 025

101. Victoria Road ( 1388 )

VijayaBank

No. 25 , Victoria Road

Bangalore 560 047

102. C. M. S. B. ( 1389)

VijayaBank

Capital Market ServiceBr. 35, K. G. Road

Bangalore 560 009

103 S. S. I. ( 1392)

VijayaBank

No. 2-A, ResidencyRoad Bangalore 560 025

104. Koramangala ( 1394)

VijayaBank

No. 24 , 1 Floor

VCross, 5Block, Koramangala

Bangalore 560 095

105. Corporate Banking

Branch(1398)

VijayaBank

FirstFloor

Bharatiya Vidya BhavanBldg.

Race Course Road

Bangalore560 001

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 106. HBR Layout (1440)

VijayaBank

No. 805 , II Cross

HBR Layout

IBlock , Kalyannagar

Bangalore 560 043

107. Vijaya Bank

Divisional Accounts Office (9201 )

34,Hariram Complex

K. G. Road Bangalore 560 009

2 108. R. O. Bangalore (9124)

VijayaBank

RegionalOffice

Shrutha Complex

19 , Primrose Road

OffM. G. Road

Bangalore 560 025

109. Overseas Branch

VijayaBank

Shrutha Complex

No. 19, Primrose Road

OffM.G. Road

Bangalore 560 025

110. Currency Chest (9601)

VijayaBank

CurrencyChest

TrinityCircle

41/2, M. G. Road Bangalore560 001

VIJAYA BANK

HEAD OFFICE

BANGALORE

' C' REGION

111. Aranthodu - 1254

Mangalore-Madikeri Road

Aranthodu

Sullia Taluk

D. K. District

Kamataka

Pincode-574239

112. Ardi - 1007

Someswar-Koteswar Road

Ardi

Kundapur Taluk

Udupi District

Karnataka

Pincode-576212

113. Arkula- 1269

Parangipet

Bantwal Taluk

Karnataka

Pincode-574143 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

114. Athradi - 1011

MainRoad Athradi Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode- 576123

B. C. Road- 1012

115.

Opp .Modern Tiles Post-Jodumarga B. C. Road Bantwal Taluk Karnataka

Pincode-574219

116. Badanidiyoor - 1016 Satya Deep Bldg. Badanidiyoor Udupi Taluk Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode-576115

117. Bellare- 1026

Bellare SulliaTaluk D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-574212

Belmannu- 1028

118.

Indrabhavan Bldg.

Belmannu Karkala Taluk D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-576111

119. Belthangadi - 1029

P. B. No. 2 Guru Narayana Swamy Bldg . Belthangadi D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574214

120. Bendoor- 1030

Vasmahal Building Bendoor Branch Mangalore D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-575002

121. Bettampady - 1231

Shiva Kshetra Bettamkpady

Puttur Taluk D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-574259

2809

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

Brahmavar- 1037

122.

P. B. No. 21

Brahmavar

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

Pincode-576213

123. Darbe-Puttur- 1053 P. B. No. 204 Konkan Trade Centre Darbe Puttur Puttur Taluk

Karnataka

Pincode-574202

124. Dharmasthala - 1057

Dharmasthala Belthangadi Taluk D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode- 574216

125. Doddathota- 1249

Doddathota Sullia Taluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574248

126. Donderangadi - 1257

Donderangadi

Post-Kukkuje KarkalaTaluk

Udupi District

Karnataka

Pincode-574108

127. Gulwadi- 1241

Kundapura Taluk

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

Pincode-576283

128. Halady- 1073

Panchayat Bldg.

Halady

Kundapur Taluk

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

Pincode- 576250

Hebri- 1080

129.

Kachoor Road

Hebri

Karkala Taluk Udupi District

Karnataka

Pincode-576112 2810

130. Hiriadka- 1085

Udupi District

Udupi -KarkalaRd. Hiriadka Karnataka

Pincode- 576113

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 139. Kasarakod- 1113 Hiremath -Post Kasarkod Branch Honnavar Taluk U. D. District Karnataka

Pincode-581342

131. Ishwaramangila - 1235 Post-Nettanige D. K. District

PutturTaluk Karnataka

Pincode-574313

140.

Kaup- 1116

MainRoad

Kaup

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

132.

Pincode-574106

Jakribettu - 1094 Thyagaraj Road Jakribettu Bantwal Taluk Karnataka

Pincode- 574211

133.

141. Kavu - 1117 KishanBldg . Kavu PutturTaluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574223

Kodimbala- 1236

Kalathur - 1104 Via-Kaup Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode- 574135

142. Post-Kadaba

PutturTaluk

D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-574221

134. Kalladka - 1105 SriramBldg. Kalladka Bantwal Taluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode -574222

143. Kollamogaru - 1311

Sullia Taluk

D. K. District

Karnataka

135.

Pincode-574218

144.

Korangrapady- 1127

Kambadakone - 1106 Kundapur Taluk Udupi District Karnataka

Via-Udyavar

Pincode- 576219

Udupi District

136. Kandlur- 1108 NearBridge Kandlur KundapurTaluk Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode- 576240

Karnataka

Pincode-574118

145.

Kukkikatte- 1237

Theatre Complex

Kukkikatte

Udupi District

Karnataka

1.37. Kaniyoor - 1309

Pincode -576101

B. K. Complex Post-Kaniyoor PutturTaluk D. K. District

Karnataka

146.

Kukkujadka - 1291

Near Bus Stand

Kukkujadka

Sullia Taluk

Karnataka

Pincode-574328

138. Karkala - 1111

Pincode- 574212

147. Kukkundoor- 1129

Opp. Bus Stand Karkala

Udupi District

Karnataka

Karkala Taluk

Udupi District

Karnataka

Pincode - 574104

Pincode -576117 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

Kumbra-1242

148.

HarshaBuilding Kumbra Puttur Taluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574258

Kundapur-1048

149.

P. B. No. 21

New Brindavan Bldg. Kundapur UdupiDistrict Karnataka

Pincode-576201

150. Machina- 1133

Post-Ballamanja Machina Branch Belthangadi Taluk D.K. District

Karnataka

Pincode- 574295

151. Mandarthi - 1140 CarStreet Mandarthi Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode-576223

Mani - 1143

152.

RajalaxmiBldg. Mani Bantwal Taluk D.K. District Karnataka

Pincode- 574253

153. Moodabettu - 1148 ZoharBuilding Moodabettu Post-Katapady UdupiDistrict Karnataka

Pincode-574105

Mundaje- 1152

154.

Somanthadka Mundaje Belthangadi Taluk D.K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574228 155. Nada- 1154

S. S. Shetty Building Nada

Kundapur Taluk

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

Pincode-574622 824G1 /03-10

2811

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

Nettana- 1162

156.

AlankarBuilding

Nettana

PutturTaluk D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-574230

157. Nirebailur- 1165

Post-Bailur

Karkala Taluk

Udupi District

Karnataka

Pincode-574102

158. Nitte- 1166

NearPost Office

Nitte

Karkala Taluk

Karnataka

Pincode- 574110

159. Padubidri - 1167

Mahadevi Building

MainRoad Padubidri Udupi District

Karnataka

Pincode-574111

Pakshikere- 1168

160.

Post-Kemral

Via-Haleangadi

D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574146

Pangala- 1172

161.

MainRoad

Pangala

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

Pincode-576122

Perdoor- 1174

162.

AlangarHegde Bldg .

CarStreet Perdoor Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode-576124

Polali-1175

163.

Via-B .C.Road

BantwalTaluk

D.K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-574284 2812

164. Puttur-Main - 1177

P. B. No. 2

K.P. Complex Puttur D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574201 165. Saibarkatta - 1185 Udupi Taluk Udupi District Karmataka

Pincode- 576266 166. Salvady- 1187

KalavarVillage Kundapur Taluk Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode- 576222 167. Sanoor - 1190 Karkala Taluk Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode-574114 168. Sarapady- 1310 Bantwal Taluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-576264 169. Shirva- 1197

MainRoad Shirva Branch Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode - 574411

170. Shishila - 1307

Belthangady Taluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode- 574198

171. Siddakatte- 1198

Bantwal Talluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode- 574237

172. Sooda- 1308

Sooda Karkala Taluk UdupiDistrict Karnataka

Pincode-574127

173. Sullia- 1378

PcardBankBldg. Sullia Puttur Taluk Karnataka

Pincode-574239

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] 174. Thallur - 1243

Kundapur Taluk

UdupiDistrict

Karnataka

Pincode- 576230

175. Thottam- 1206

Opp. Church

Thottam Branch Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode-576143

176. Thumbe- 1207

MainRoad Thumbe Bantwal Taluk D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574170

177. Yellur- 1227

Padubidri -Shirva Road

Post-Pilar Yellur UdupiDistrict Kamataka

Pincode-574113

178. Uchila- 1210

Udupi Taluk Udupi District Karnataka

Pincode-574117

179. Udane- 1239

Puttur Taluk

Post-Shiradi D. K. District Karnataka

Pincode-574229

180. Udupi Main - 1211

SurekhaBuilding

K. M. Marg

Udupi

Karnataka

Pincode-576101

181. Udupi-Puttur- 1212

Santhekatte Kalyanpur UdupiDistrict Karnataka

Pincode-576125

182. Ujire- 1213

CollegeRoad

Ujire

Belthangady Taluk

D. K. District

Karnataka

Pincode-576240 2813

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

183. Vittal - 1222

Vittal-Puttur Road

Vittal

D. K. District

Bantwal Taluk Karnataka

Pincode- 576243

Branches Recommended by Burdwan Region for notification under O. L. Rules

1. Punjab National Bank B. O.: Bhaturia, P. O. Chak Bamungaria, Dist. Burdwan, Pin : 713 513

2. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Burdwan (B. C. Road), 75, Bijay Chand Road, PO + Dist . Burdwan , Pin 713 101

3. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Burdwan (G. T. Road) , P. O. 109 , G. T. Road, Dist. Burdwan , Pin 713 101

4. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Haripur Kenda, PO: Haripur , Via : Bahula, Dist: Burdwan, Pin: 713 342

5. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Khatiar, Vill: Khatiar, P.O.: Kalanpur, Dist: Burdwan, Pin : 713 128

6. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Ambika Nagar , Vill+ PO : Ambika Nagar, Dist :Bankura, Pin : 722 140

7. Punjab National Bank

B. O.:Gopinathpur, Vill + P.O.: Gopinathpur , Dist: Bankura, Pin : 722 101

8. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Hetia, Via : Joypur, Vill+ PO: Hetia, Dist:Bankura, Pin : 722 138

Banki tàu , í 9. Punjab National

205SAN B. O .: Indas , Vill+ P.O.: Indus , Dist: Bankura, Pin : 722

10. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Masiara, Vill+ P.O.: Masiara, Dist: Bankura, Pin : 722 101

11. Punjab National Bank'

B. O.: Moynapur, Vill+ P . O.: Moynapur, Dist: Bankura , Pin : 722 138

12. Punjab National Bankeniuses B. O.: Radha Nagar, Vill+ P. O:: Bon Radha Nagar, Dist:Bankura, Pin : 722 157

13. Punjab National Bank B. O.: Santore, Vill+ P . O.: Baliara, Dist: Bankura, Pin : 722 101

14. Punjab National Bank B. O.: Shyam Nagar ( Joypur ) , Vill+ P. O.: Shyam Nagar, Dist: Bankura, Pin : 722 138

15. Punjab National Bank B. O .: Babnan Bazar, P. O.: Babnan Bazar, Dist: Hooghly, Pin : 712305

16. Punjab National Bank B. O.: Bamuneri , Delhi Road, P. O.: Rishra, Dist:Hooghly, Pin: 712248

17. Punjab National Bank B. O.: Bhandarhati , Vill+ P . O: Bhandarhati , Dist: Hooghly, Pin : 712301

18. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Nalikul, P. O.: Nalikul, Dist:Hooghly, Pin : 712407

19. Punjab National Bank B.O.: Nimdangi , P. O.: Nimdangi , Via:Bhatipara, Dist: Hooghly, Pin: 712414

20. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Rajbalhat, P. O.: Rajbalhat, Dist: Hooghly, Pin: 712408

21. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Shyampur Bazar, P. O.: Par Shyampur, Dist : Hooghly, Pin: 712.401

22. Punjab National Bank

B. O.:Mallarpur, Vill+ P.O.: Mallarpur (Dakshingram ) , Dist: Birbhum, Pin : 731 245

23. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Sumna, P. O.: Sumna (At Cantonment ) , Dist: Darjeeling, Pin: 734225

24. Punjab National Bank- B. O.: Bidhan Nagar , P. O.: Batabari (Via Chalsa) , Dist: Jalpaiguri, Pin : 735 206 2814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

25. Punjab National Bank

B. O .: Kumbhira ,

Vill + P. O.: Joyenpur, Via: Kaliachowk, Dist:Malda, Pin 732 101

26. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Bewa, Vill : Palasi ,

P.O .: Farakka,

Dist: Murshidabad, Pin 742 212

27. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Raiganj ,

Hazarilal Market Compl ,

P. O.: Raiganj ,

Dist : N. Dinajpur, Pin : 733 134

28. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Rampara Chanchra,

P. O. Chauchra,

Dist : S. Dinajpur , Pin : 733 124

29. Punjab National Bank

B. O.: Gangtok , 31 A National Highway,

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 36. Punjab National Bank Branch Office

Memnagar Subhash Chowk , Memnagar Ahmedabad -380052

Dist. Ahmedabad

37. Punjab National Bank

Eastern Zonal Office,

Apeejay House ,

↓ 4thFloor, 15Park Street, Kolkata-700016

38. Punjab National Bank

Brajarajnagar LamtiBahal Brajarajnagar-768230

39. Punjab National Bank

Maneswar

P. O.: Deorali , Gangtok, Sikkim, Pin: 737 102

List of Offices to be notified under Rule 10(4) of

Official Language Rules Chennai Zone :

30. Punjab National Bank Regional:Office

26-27 Raheja Towers, M. G. Road Bangalore 560 001

31. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office

Srinivasa Sardagi:

Taluka & District Gulbarga

Srinivasa Saradagi 585286

32. Punjab National Bank Branch Office KollamBig Bazar Big Bazar Kollam 691001

33. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office Ernakulam, M.G. Road 35/2240 - A, M.G. Road Ravipuram Ernakulam -628016

34. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office Thruvananthapuram Statue Junction Thruvananthapuram - 695001

35. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office

Sambalpur -768120

40. Punjab National Bank Laikera

Jharsuguda-768215

41. Punjab National Bank Kissennagar

Cuttack -754131

42. Punjab National Bank Banth

Bhadrak- 756120

43. Punjab National Bank

Darpan, Chandikhole Jaipur-755044

State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur HeadOffice

Jaipur

Branch to be notified in the Official Gazette under Rule 10(4) of Official Languages Rules , 1976

1. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur

Plot No. 44, Pandurangpuram Vishakhapatnam- 530003

2. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Sarita Vihar Branch, New Delhi

Rajasthan State

Thruvananthapuram, Erbridge Junction M. G. Road Thruvananthapuram - 695001

3. StateBank of Bikaner & Jaipur ServiceBranch ,

Udaipur 2815

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SyndicateBank

1. SYNDICATEBANK

LeadDistrict Office

SrinivasaNagar

P.B. No. 35

Anantapur - 515001 (AP)

2. SYNDICATE BANK

Konakondla Branch

Door No. 1/102, Konakondla

Vijrakarur Mandal

Anantapur- 515842 (AP)

3. SYNDICATE BANK

HindupurBranch

Ediga Ramaih Building

Balaj Talkies Circle , Railway StationRoad Hindupur-515201

Anantapur Dt. (AP)

4. SYNDICATE BANK

Bylakuppe Branch

Bangalore-Mangalore Road

Bylakuppe , Periapatna Taluk

MysoreDistrict, Karnataka

PIN-571104

5. SYNDICATE BANK

Gundlupet Branch

Bangalore Niligiri Road

P.B. No. 2, Gundlupet,

Chamarajnagar District

Karnataka PIN -571111

6. SYNDICATE BANK

Nanjangud Branch

Near Railway Gate Broadway Road, Nanjangud, Mysore

District, Karnataka

PIN- 571301

7. SYNDICATE BANK

Somanahalli Branch

Bangalore-Mysore Road

Somanahalli , Mandya District

Karnataka PIN 571429

8. SYNDICATEBANK

Maddur Branch

Bangalore Road

Maddur, Mandya District

Karnataka PIN 571428

9. SYNDICATE BANK

Ahmedabad Patherkuva Branch Business Centre

Near Ambica Centre

ReliefRoad, Patherkuva

Ahmedabad- 380001

10. SYNDICATEBANK

Ahmedabad Ashram Road Branch

Neptune Towers

Opp. Nehru Bridge

Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009

11. SYNDICATEBANK

Ahmedabad Relief Road Branch

4611 Sadaket Building

ReliefRoad, Near Zakaria Masjid

Ahmadabad - 380001

12. SYNDICATE BANK

Ahmedabad Navarangapura Branch

Manickyan Apartments

Sardar Patel Nagar

Opp.Hotal Classic Gold

Navarangpura, Ahmedabad 380 006

13. SYNDICATEBANK

Ahmedabad Navavadaj Br.

Satyam Shopping Centre

1stFloor, Bhimjpura,

Char Rasta, Navavadaj Ahmedabad - 380013

14. SYNDICATE BANK

Ahmedabad Manek

Chowk Branch, Jain Wadi

Ahmedabad - 380001

15. SYNDICATEBANK

Ahmedabad Khadia -

RaipurBranch

Raipur Chakala

Near Chakaleshwar Mahadev

Temple, Khadla -Ralpur Area

Ahmedabad - 380001

16. SYNDICATE BANK

Surendarnagar Branch

Jawahar Road

Opp. Old Kanya Shala

Surenderanagar - 363001

17. SYNDICATE BANK

BhujBranch

4, Bankers Colony

Mandvi Road BHUJ ( KACHCHH) 370001

18. SYNDICATEBANK

SegavaBranch

AT & PO Segava Ta, Kamrej Dist . Surat Gujarat

Segava - 394 320

19. SYNDICATEBANK

Valsad (Bulsar) Branch

Ramkripa, Nani Khatrivad

M.G. Road

Valsad (Bulsar) 396 001

Gujarat 2816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

20 SYNDICATEBANK

Morvi Branch

Savsar Plot , Doshi Towers 1st Floor, Morvi Dist, Rajkot (Gujarat) Pin363 641

21. SYNDICATE BANK

Motikhavadi Branch

Near RPL Site , Dwarka Road

Digvijay Gram P.Ο. Dist, Jamnagar (Gujarat) Motikhavadi -361 140

22. SYNDICATEBANK

Bagumara Branch

Tal . PalsanaDist. Surat(Gujarat)

Bagumara - 394605

23. SYNDICATE BANK

Kadodara Branch

Shakti Sadan , N.H.No. 8 AT & PO: Kadodara Tal. Palsana Dist . Surat (Gujarat) Kadodara - 394 327

24. SYNDICATE BANK

Dasaj Branch

Akshar Purushottam Swamy Narayan Mandir, Dasaj , Ta. Uniha Dist. Metsana (Gujarat )

Dasaj - 384 170

25. SYNDICATEBANK

Vadodara (Baroda)

Raopura Branch

Satyen Chambers Behind UshakiranBldg. Pratap Road , Raopura Vadodara (Baroda) 390001

26. SYNDICATE BANK

Gandhinagar Branch

' Samrudhi ' GH -4 Sector 16 , Gandhinagar (Gujarat) 382016

27. SYNDICATE BANK

PorbandarBranch

Kedareshwar Road Porbandar(Gujarat) 360575

28. SYNDICATE BANK

Gandhidham Branch

PlotNo. 240, Sector 12B

Nahata Chambers Gandhidham, Dist . Kachchh Gujarat PIN 370201

29. SYNDICATEBANK

HajiraBranch

Sri Krishna Bldg, Surat-Hajra Road, Ta. Choryasi Dist . Surat HAJIRA - 394270

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] 30. SYNDICATEBANK

RajkotBranch

3-ModiBuilding Dharmendra Road Rajkot (Gujarat) 360001

31. SYNDICATE BANK

Aithor Branch

Aithor Pragati MandalBldg Dist. Mehasana AITHOR(Gujarat)

PIN 384175

32. SYNDICATEBANK

Maktupur Brnach

Sri Nilkanth VidyalayaBuilding Ta. Unjha, Dist. Patan (Gujarat)

MAKTUPUR- 384170

33. SYNDICATEBANK

Erthan Branch

TakımaPatia

Ta . Olpad Dist . Surat (Gujarat)

ERTHAN - 394540

34. SYNDICATEBANK

Vadodara Mandvi Main Branch

Dhybar Shopping Centre Gendigate-Mandvi Road Vadodara-390017 (Gujarat)

35. SYNDICATE BANK

JamnagarBranch

Anjaral Chambers

1st Floor , A& B Block, K.V. Road Jamnagar-360001 (Gujarat)

36. SYNDICATE BANK

Mumbai KharBranch

KukyVilla, 5th Floor KharWest Mumbai-400052

37. SYNDICATE BANK

Sundernagar

(Malad West) Branch Madina Manzil , S. V. Road GoregaonWest Mumbai -400082

38. SYNDICATE BANK

Mandvi Branch 93-93A- 95

SugarHouse , Kazi Syed Street, Mandi Mumbai 400003

39. SYNDICATEBANKA

MarolBranch

B-50, Girija Indl Estate. Mahakali Caves Road Marol, Mumbai 400003 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

40. SYNDICATE BANK

Mumbai Mulund Branch

543 Sagar Niwas N.S. Road, Mumbai West Mumbai -400080

41. SYNDICATE BANK

Mumbai Mahim Branch

206, Ramesh Opp . City Light Cinema Lady Jamshedji Road. Mahim, Mumbai -400016

42. SYNDICATE BANK

Mumbai Malbar Hill Branch

ShreepalNagar 12 JM Mehta Road MalbarHill Mumbai -400006

43. SYNDICATE BANK

Mumbai Andheri West Branch 210/C Vimal Apartment C.D. Barfiwala Marg Juhu Lane , Andheri West Mumbai -400058

44. SYNDICATEBANK

Goddev Branch

Nikisha Arcade Goddev Phatak Road Bhayander East -401105

45. SYNDICATEBANK

Bhiwandi Branch

404 Vishin Apartment

B Wing, 1st Floor, Gokul Nagar Bhiwandi -421302 (Maharashtra) 46. SYNDICATEBANK

Mumbai Kaman Branch

Govind Patil Building Bus Stand Kaman Maharashtra

47. SYNDICATEBANK

Ichalkaranj Branch

10/286, Bangalow Marg Opp. Stadium, P.O. Box No. 89 Ichalkaranj -416115 (Maharashtra State)

48. SYNDICATEBANK

Pune Housing Finance Branch Bharati Vidyapeeth Bhawan IlIrd Floor LalBahadur Shastri Marga Pune-411030 (Maharashtra State) 49. SYNDICATEBANK

Shirdi Branch

The Pilgrim's Inn, MTDC Tal .Kopargaon, Shirdi -423109 Dist.Ahmednagar (Maharashtra)

2817

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925.

50. SYNDICATE BANK

Shendre Branch

ShahuNagar SHENDRE-415001 Distt. Satara (Maharashtra State)

51. SYNDICATE BANK

Kallianpur Branch

MainRoad, Kallianpur

Udupi Taluk, Dist . Udupi Karntaka State PIN 576114

52. SYNDICATEBANK

Manipal Branch

P.B. No. 13

UdupiDist

Karnataka PIN 576119

53. SYNDICATE BANK

KaupBranch

Main Road, Kaup UdupiDistrict Karnataka

PinCode-574106

54. SYNDICATE BANK

UdupiNew Market yard Br.

1stFloor, Baidshree Building

NewMarket Yard Post Ambalpady , Udupi Dist ...

Karnataka PIN 576103

55. SYNDICATEBANK

Sringeri Branch Bharathi Street Sringeri Chickmangalur Dist.

Karnataka - 577139

56. SYNDICATEBANK

Mangalore Housing Finance Branch

Syndicate Building , Ground Floor

Hampankatta, Managalore

Dakshina Kannada Dist

Karnataka-575001

57. SYNDICATEBANK

Mangalore Mission Street Branch

Mission Street

Mangalore Dakshina Kannada Dist

Karnataka- 575001

58. SYNDICATEBANK

Nimbagal Branch

Uravakonda Taluk

Dist. Anantpur Andhra Pradesh - 515824 2818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

59. SYNDICATE BANK

Guntakal Branch

16/86 , Old Bus Stand MainRoad, Guntakal Dist. Ananthapur Andhra Pradesh - 515801

60. SYNDICATE BANK

Kalyandurg Branch 8/931, Hindupur Road Ghanta Buildings , Kalyandurg Dist. Anantapur Andhra Pradesh-515761

61. SYNDICATEBANK

SiddharthaMedical College Branch N.T.R. University of Health Sciences Ring Road, Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh-520008

62. SYNDICATEBANK

Dandhisahi Branch VPO Dandisahi Dist.Kendrapara Orissa-754240

63. SYNDICATEBANK

Podadiha Branch

R.O. Podadiha via Nidhadha, Dist . Mayurbhanj Orissa-757079

64. SYNDICATEBANK

TanguturBranch

DoorNo. 13-21 Grand Trunk Road TANGUTUR-523274 OngoleMandal Prakasam district (Andhra Pradesh)

65. SYNDICATE BANK

Dornala Branch K.G. Road DORNALA - 523331 Markapur Mandal Prakasam District (Andhra Pradesh)

66. SYNDICATEBANK

Marella Branch MARELLA - 523201 Via-Addanki Prakasam District (Andhra Pradesh )

67. SYNDICATEBANK

PothalapaduBranch

POTHALAPADU - 523315 Gajjalakonda S.O. Thariupadų, Mandal Prakasam District (Andhra Pradesh)

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 68. SYNDICATEBANK

NagulavaramBranch NAGULAVARAM- 523333 Via-Cumbum Prakasam District (Andhra Pradesh)

69. SYNDICATE BANK

Ambavaram Branch AMBAVARAM -523 112 NearRamalayam C.S. Puram Mandal Prakasam District (Andhra Pradesh)

70. SYNDICATEBANK

Mumbai Zonal Office

Maker Tower

E, II Floor PlotNo. 85, Cuffe Parade Colaba, Mumbai -400005

71. SYNDICATE BANK

SikharpurBranch

At/PO Sikharpur ViaSarankul Dist . Nayagarh Orissa, Pin- 752080

72. SYNDICATE BANK

PattapurBranch

Pattapur Digpahandy Tehsil Dist.Ganjam Orissa, Pin-761013

73. SYNDICATE BANK

BaripadaBranch

P.B. No. 5, Barabazar

Badepada Dist .MayurBhanj Orissa Pin-757001

74. SYNDICATEBANK Badapada Branch At & PO Badapada Dist. Kendrapara Orissa, Pin- 754245

75. SYNDICATEBANK

Parahat Branch At& PO Parahat Dist . Jagatsinghpur Orissa, Pin-754108

76. SYNDICATE BANK RayagadaBranch Raygada Via Parlakhemundi Dist.Gajapathi Orissa, Pin-761213 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

77. SYNDICATE BANK

Sirsa Branch

City Thana Road

Sirsa

Haryana Pin - 125055

78. SYNDICATE BANK

Hindan Air Force Station Branch Hindan

Dist. Ghaziabad

UttarPradesh , Pin -201004 79. SYNDICATE BANK

Bulandshar DAV College Branch RailwayRoad

Bulandshahar

Dist. Bulandshahar

UttarPradesh, Pin - 20300 I 80. SYNDICATE BANK

Hapur SSV College Branch Delhi Road

Hapur

Dist. Ghaziabad

Uttar Pradesh, Pin -245101 81. SYNDICATE BANK

Chandigarh Branch

SCO66-67

Sector 17 B Bank Square

PostBox No. 107

Chandigarh - 160017

82. SYNDICATE BANK

Lakhimpur Branch

362-Nai Basti

Bus Station Road

Lakhimpur -khiri

Uttar Pradesh , Pin -262701 83. SYNDICATE BANK

Raichur Station Road Branch StationRoad

Raichur

Karnataka - 584101

84. SYNDICATE BANK

Hospet SSI Branch

PostBox No. 5

Station Road,

Hospet, Bellary District

Karnataka

85. SYNDICATE BANK

Hageri Branch

Ms. Panyam Cement &

Minerals Industries Ltd. FactoryArea

Hageri , Bellary District

Karnataka - 583138

824G1/03-11

2819

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

86. SYNDICATE BANK

Mysore St. Philomena's

CollegeBranch

Mysore-Bangalore Road, Mysore

Karnataka- 570015

87. SYNDICATE BANK

Kuvempunagar Branch

834, Kanthi Complex

New Kantraj Urs Road

Kuvempunagar

MYSORE-570023

88. SYNDICATE BANK

MYSORE NIE Branch

Mananthawady Road

Mysore

Karnataka-570008

89. SYNDICATE BANK

MysoreChamumdipuram Branch

904/3 , Jhansi Laxmi Bai Road Chamundipuram, Mysore

Karnataka - 570003

90. SYNDICATE BANK

Mysore J. P. Nagar Branch

Mahaveer Complex, D Block

J.P. Nagar , Mysore

Karnataka -570008

91. SYNDICATE BANK

Bangalore Jayanagar

4th TBlock Branch

16th Main Road

Jayanagar , Bangalore

Karnataka- 560041

92. SYNDICATE BANK

Bangalore Vijaya College

CampusBranch

R.V. Road,

Basavanagudi

Bangalore Karnataka - 560004

93. SYNDICATE BANK

RegionalOffice

Pioneer Towers , I Floor

Shanmugham Road,

P.B. No. 2616 , Emakulam

Kochi, Kerala-682031

94. SYNDICATE BANK

Ernakulam M.G. Road Branch

Muthoot Towers , I Floor

Door No. XL/6893

P.B. No. 3629 , M.G. Road,

Ernakulam Kochi

Kerala-682035 2820

95. SYNDICATE BANK

Kochi Kottukulam Road

(Main) Branch

VI/ 1600 , Kottukulam Road, P.B. No. 153 , Mattanchery Kochi , Kerala -682002

96. SYNDICATEBANK

Kochi Perumanoor Branch

P.B. No. 1652 Perumanoor Kochi Kerala-682015

97. SYNDICATEBANK

Kochi Stock Exchange Branch Veekshanam Road Eranakulam Kerala -682035

98. SYNDICATE BANK

Kochi Cherlai Branch

Kokani Bhasha Bhavan Cherlai Road , Kochi Kerala-682002

99. SYNDICATE BANK

Ernakulam Housing Finance Branch Muthoot Towers , 1 Floor Door No. XL/ 6893 M.G. Road, Ernakulam Kerala -682035

100. SYNDICATE BANK

Kozhikode Cherooty Road

(Main) Branch P.B. No. 61 , Cherooty Road Khozikhode Kerala-673001

101. SYNDICATE BANK

Khozhikode Kunduparamba Branch Door No. 38/1610 , (Ward No. 36 & 37), Kunduparamba, Post Edkkad Kozhikode , Kerala -673005

102. SYNDICATEBANK

Palakkad Melamuri Branch

I Floor , Κ.Τ.Κ. Arcade Melamurai Junction PostPallipuram , Palakkad Kerala-678006

103. SYNDICATE BANK

Kalamassery Branch

Woodlands Annexe Eloor Road, Kalamassery Kerala-683104

104. SYNDICATE BANK

Angamaly Branch

20/148 , Janata Building I Floor , Church Junction, Angama Kerala-683572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 105. SYNDICATE BANK

VadakaraBranch

20/408A, Maurya Arcade P.B. No. 4, Vadakara Kerala-673101

106. SYNDICATEBANK

Koyilandy Branch

P.B. No. 1 , Opp . Taluk Office

Main Road , Koyilandy Kerala-673305

107. SYNDICATE BANK

Thrissur Branch P.B. No. 511 Palace Road , Thrissur Kerala-680020

108. SYNDICATEBANK

Mattathur Branch

10/528 , Kodaly , Post Pady TalukMukundapuram District Thrissur Kerala-680699

109. SYNDICATE BANK

Trikkur Branch

Main Road 1/383 Trikkur-Ollur Kerala-680314

110. SYNDICATE BANK

GuruvayurBranch Krishnanjali Shopping Complex East Nada, Guruvayur Kerala-680101

111. SYNDICATE BANK

TirurBranch

P.B. No. 36 , C.K.L. Buildings

Thazepalam Junction Tirur, Dist. Mallapuram Kerala-676101

112. SYNDICATE BANK

Thodupuzha Branch

P.B. No. 7 , Prakash Buildings Thodupuzha, District Idukki Kerala-685584

113. SYNDICATEBANK

Kochi Currency Chest Kottukulam Road P.B. No. 153 , Kochi Kerala-682002

114. SYNDICATE BANK

Kochi Vadhuthala Branch

Vakkachan Towers Chittor Road, Vaduthala Ernakulam Kochi Kerala-682023 2821

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

115. SYNDICATEBANK

Ernakulam Banerjee Road Branch

XLI 768, I Floor

P.B. No. 1902, Banerjee Road, Ernakulam, Kerala-682018

116. SYNDICATEBANK

RegionalOffice

2/4, Manvi Building

144, Neelgin Road, P.B. No. 557, Hubli -580029

Karnakala State

117. SYNDICATE BANK

Hubli Super Market Branch

Dajbanpet , Super Market

P.B. No. 707,

Hubli -580028

Karnataka State

118. SYNDICATE BANK

Dharwad K.U.C. Branch

Karnataka University Campus

Chhota Mahabaleshwar

Dharward-580003

Karnataka State

119. SYNDICATE BANK

Karajgi Branch

MainBazar

Karajgi -581112

Karnatala State

120. SYNDICATE BANK

Dharwad Vidyagiri Branch

J.S.S. College Campus

P.B. Road, Dharwad- 580004

Karnataka State

121. SYNDICATEBANK

Dharwad Karnataka A & S College Branch Karnataka College Campus

CollegeRoad, Dharwad-580001

Karnataka State

122. SYNDICATE BANK

Belgaum Shahpur Branch

Laxminarayan Bhavan

Mahatma Phule Road, P.B. No. 12 Shahpur, Belgaum- 590003

Karnataka State

123. SYNDICATE BANK

Satti Branch

Ward No. 2 , Near Bus Stand

Satti - 591240 , Athani Taluk

Belgaum District

Karnataka State

124. SYNDICATE BANK

Deshnur Branch

535 B , Shanti Nivas

Deshnur - 591147

Bailhongal Taluk, Belgaum District Karnataka State

125. SYNDICATE BANK

Aijnadka

Pariathadka, Post Punacha

Aijnadka- 574281 , Bantwal Taluk

D.K. District

Karnataka State

126. SYNDICATE BANK

Guttigar Branch, Abhilasha

MainRoad, Guttigar- 574218

Sullia Taluk, D.K. District

Karnataka State

127. SYNDICATE BANK

Mangalore Kankanady Branch

Dr. L.P. Fernandes Memorial Bldg .

FatherMullers Circle

Mangalore-575002

Karnataka State

128. SYNDICATE BANK

Mangalore Central Accounts Office

P.B. No. 205 , II Floor

RamnathKripa

PortRoad, Bunder,

Mangalore-575001

Karnataka State

129. SYNDICATE BANK

Vittal Branch

Near Bus Stand, Campco Bldg .

Vittal-574243, Bantwal Taluk

Dakshina Kannada District

Karnataka State

130. SYNDICATE BANK

SulliaBranch

SVM Building, Main Road

Sullia- 574239

Dakshina Kannada District

Karnataka State

131. SYNDICATE BANK

Yelemadalu Branch

Balehonnur -Jayapura Road

Post Durgadabetta

Yelemadalu -574239

Koppa Taluk , ChikmaglurDist.

Karnataka State

132. SYNDICATE BANK

Guruvayakere Branch

Nagarika Seva Samiti Building

Ist Floor, Main Roa

Guruvayakere-574217

Belthangady Taluk, D.K. District

Karnataka State 2822

133. SYNDICATE BANK

Mangalore Currency Chest " Panchami " Complex

Opp . KSTRC Bus Stand

Kavoor Cross , Bejai

Mangalore- 575004 , D.K. District Karnataka State

134. SYNDICATE BANK

BarkurBranch

CarStreet, P.B. No. 1 Barkur - 576210 Udupi District Karnataka State

135. SYNDICATEBANK

Basrur Branch

PostOffice Road Basrur- 576211 Kundapur Taluk, Udupi District Karnataka State

136. SYNDICATE BANK

Udupi Catholic Centre Branch Syndicate Towers Catholic Centre , P.B. No. 38 Udupi- 576101 Karnataka State

137. SYNDICATEBANK

Yenagudde Branch

1stFloor , Raviram Building Yenagudde-574105 P.O. Katapadi , Udupi District Karnataka State

138. SYNDICATEBANK

Nakre Branch , Maria KripaBldg.

Main Road, Kukkikatte Kukkundur Post Nakre-576117 Karkala Taluk, Udupi District Karnataka State

139. SYNDICATE BANK

Udupi Kunjbettu Branch

M.G.M. College Campus

"Nalanda " Kunjbettu Udupi-576 101 Karnataka State

140. SYNDICATE BANK

Shiruru Branch

Byndoor-Bhatkal Main Road Shiruru - 576228 Kundapur Taluk , Udupi District Karnataka State

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 141. SYNDICATE BANK

Kolluru Branch

1-2, Main Road Kolluru -576220 , Kundapura Taluk UdupiDistrict Karnataka

142. SYNDICATEBANK

Ananthapur Main Branch

Station Road, P.B. No. 20 Ananthapur-515004 Andhra Pradesh State

143. SYNDICATEBANK

Atmakur Branch

7/71 , I Floor , Main Road Atmakur - 515751 Ananthapur District Andhra Pradesh State

144. SYNDICATE BANK

AnanthpurOldTown Branch

Door No. 28/195/113 , I Floor

MainRoad, Pioneer Plaza, Gandhi Nagar, Old Town, Ananthapur - 515002 Andhra Pradesh State

145. SYNDICATE BANK

Honnuru Branch

Door No. 5-61 , Main Road ViaVidupanakal Honnuru -515870

Ananthapur, Dist Andhra Pradesh State

146. SYNDICATE BANK

Penakachela Branch

Penakacherla Dam

Garadinni Mandal Penakacherla - 515736

Ananthapur Dist. Andhra Pradesh State

147. SYNDICATE BANK

Sanevaripalli Branch

Enumulavaripalli Post

Sanevaripalli - 515501

AnanthapurDist. Andhra Pradesh State

148. SYNDICATE BANK

Singanamala Branch

Door No. 4/57 Singanamala - 515435 AnanthapurDist . Andhra Pradesh State 2823

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Region: Motihari

Zone:Muzaffarpur

149. SYNDICATE BANK

6. Central Bank of India

Tadipatri Branch

Door No. 12/43 , Near Bus Stand

Name of the Branch/Office : Regional Office, Motihari 1 Floor, Ogeti Shop Building

Tadipatri-515411

Baluatal

Address:

Ananthapur Dist .

District:

East Champaran (Motihari) Andhra Pradesh State

845401

Pin:

57. Branches

BIHAR

State:

Region: Muzaffarpur

Zone: Muzaffarpur

Region: Muzaffarpur

Zone: Muzaffarpur

1. Central Bank of India

7. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office:-Zonal Office,

Name of the Branch/Office:-Lead Bank Office, Muzaffarpur

Muzaffarpur Address :

*Address:

Region Office, Muzaffarpur

District:

Muzaffarpur

"Pawapuri Vihar " Near Bhawaripur Chowk, NH -28 Muzaffarpur- 842001 , Bihar

842001

Pin:

Bhagwanpur

PostOffice:

BIHAR

State:

District:

Muzaffarpur

842001

Region:Muzaffarpur

Zone: Muzaffarpur

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

8. Central Bank of India

Region: Muzaffarpur

Name of theBranch/Office :-Lead Bank Office , Zone: Muzaffarpur

Vaishali (Hajipur ) 2. Central Bank of India

Cinema Road, Hajipur

Address :

Name of the Branch/Office :-Chief Internal

AuditorOffice

Vaishali

District:

844101

Muzaffarpur

Pin:

BIHAR

Zone

State:

KalambaghRoad

Region:Muzaffarpur Address :

Zone:Muzaffarpur

Kalambagh Road

PostOffice:

9. Central Bank of India

District:

Muzaffarpur

Name of the Branch/Office:-Sitamadhi, Lead Bank 842001

Pin:

Sitamadhi BIHAR

State:

Address:

National Market, Main Road, Region: Muzaffarpur

Zone:Muzaffarpur

Sitamadhi

3. Central Bank of India

Sitamadhi

District:

843302

Name of the Branch/Office :-Regional Office:

Pin:

Muzaffarpur

BIHAR

State:

Address :

Speakar Chowk

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

District:

Muzaffarpur

10. Central Bank of India

842001

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Name of the Branch/Office :-Siwan, Lead Bank Office Region:Muzaffarpur

Zone: Muzaffarpur

Naya Bazar, Siwan

Address :

4. Central Bank of India

Siwan

District:

Name ofthe Branch/Office:-Reginal Office: Siwan

841226

Pin:

NayaBazar, Siwan

Address:

BIHAR

State:

PostOffice:

Siwan

District:

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

841226

Pin:

11. Central Bank of India

BIHAR

State:

Region : Darbhanga

Zone:Muzaffarpur

5. Central Bank ofIndia

Name of the Branch/Office :-Saran Lead Bank Office (Chhapra) NewMarket, Chhapra

Address:

Via:

Name of the Branch Office:-Regional Office: Darbhanga

PostOffice: Chhapra

Chhapra

District:

Alalpatti

Address :

843101

Darbhanga

District:

Pin:

846003

BIHAR

Pin:

State:

BIHAR

State:

2824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region: Siwan

12. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/ Office:-Lead Bank Office , Gopalganj Address :

Gopalganj

Via:

Post Office : Gopalganj

District:

Gopalganj

Pin:

841428

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region: Darbhanga 13. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Darbhanga , Lead BankOffice Address:

Regional Office Darbhanga,

Alalpatti

PostOffice :

Darbhanga

District:

Darbhanga

Pin:

846003

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region : Darbhanga 14. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Madhubani , Lead Bank Office Address:

Dr. Ramgopal Mishra, Town Club , Station Road, Madhubani

District:

Madhubani

Pin:

849211

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region : Darbhanga 15. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office: Lead Bank Office , Samastipur Address:

Arya Samaj Road, PostOffice:

Samastipur

District:

Samastipur

Pin:

848101

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region: Darbhanga 16. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office:-Lead Bank Office, East Champaran (Motihari) Address:

Motihari Baluaatal

Via:-

PostOffice:

District:

East Champaran (Motihari) Pin:

845401

State:

BIHAR

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] Zone:Muzaffarpur Region:Motihari

17. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office:-Lead BankOffice, West-Champaran (Bettiah)

Address:

LalBazar, Bettiah

District:

West Champaran (Bettiah) Pin:

845438

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region: Paharpur

18. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Paharpur

Address :

Paharpur, Bhagwanpur PostOffice:Garjaul Via: Bhagwanpur

District:

Vaishali (Hajipur)

Pin:

844114

State:

BIHAR

Zone: Muzaffarpur Region:Muzaffarpur 19. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/ Office :-Rustampur Address:

Rustampur

PostOffice: Rustampur Via: Raghopur District:

Vaishali (Hajipur)

Pin:

844508

State:

BIHAR

Zone: Muzaffarpur Region:Muzaffarpur 20. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/ Office :-Terashiya

Address :

Terashiya

PostOffice : Hajipur Via: Raghopur

District:

Vaishali (Hajipur)

Pin:

844101

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region :Muzaffarpur 21. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office :-Harpur Hardash Address:

HarpurHardash

PostOffice:Khokhsha Via : Deshri

District:

Vaishali (Hajipur)

Pin:

-843104

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region:Muzaffarpur 22. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office:-Rahsha

Rahsha

Address:

PostOffice:

Bhagwanpur

District:

Vaishali (Hajipur)

Pin:

844114

State:

BIHAR 2825

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Region: Muzaffarpur Zone: Muzaffarpur

23. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office :-Amnour

Amnour

Address:

Postoffice:

Black garha chowk, Bochahan

Block

District:

Muzaffarpur

843111

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region : Muzaffarpur Zone: Muzaffarpur

24. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Mehshaul

Mehshaul

Address :

Via : Mehshaul

Post office:Mehshaul

Sitamadhri

District:

843228

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Muzaffarpur Zone:Muzaffarpur

25. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office:-Madhopur Chaturi Address :

Madhopur Chaturi P/office: Shaura Via:Nanpur

Sitamadhri

District:

843333

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Muzaffarpur Zone:Muzaffarpur

26. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Pohyar

Address:

Pohyar

P/office:

Pohyar

District:

Vaishali (Hajipur)

844507

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zonc :Muzaffarpur

27. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Parsauna

Parsauna

Address :

Parsauna

P/office:

District:

Saran( Chhapra )

841219

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone: Muzaffarpur

28. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Pateri

Mirzapur

Address:

P/office:

Mirzapur

Saran(Chhapra) District:

841419

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone: Muzaffarpur

29. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Aphar

Address:

ApharBlock Amnaur P/office:

Aphar

District:

Saran(Chhapra)

841402

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone: Muzaffarpur

30. Central Bank of India

Name of theBranch/Office:-Mastichak

Parsa

Address:

Mastichak

P/office:

Saran.

District:

841219

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

31. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office:-Barhariya

BlockBarhariya

Address :

P/office:

BlockBarhariya

Siwan

District:

841226

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone: Muzaffarpur

32. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Mushari Bazar

Zamo Bazar

Address:

Zamo Bazar

P/office:

Siwan

District:

841413

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

33. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office -Khajuraha Address :

Bhore, Block-Bhore

Bhore ,Block-Bhore P/office:

District:

Gopalganj

841426

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

34. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Mohmadpur

Mohmadpur

Address:

Singhwaniya

P/office:

District:

Gopalganj

841423

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

2826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

Zone :Muzaffarpur Region: Siwan

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Zone: Muzaffarpur

35. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office : Mugal Biraicha Address :

MugalBiraicha

P/office:

Mugal Biraicha

District:

Gopalganj

Pin:

84140

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur

Region:Darbhanga 41. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/ Office :-Dekuli Chatti

Dekuli Chatti

Address vill.:

Postoffice: Sonki Via: Lakshmisagar

District:

Samastipur

Pin:

846004

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur

Region : Siwan

36. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office:-Jagdishpur Address:

Jagdishpur

P/office : Jagdishpur Via: Vijaypur

District:

Gopalganj

Pin:

841508

State:

BIHAR

Region: Darbhanga 42. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office:-Dharampur Address:

Dharampur

Postoffice:

Kusheshwar Sthan District:

Darbhanga

Pin:

848213

State:

BIHAR

Zone: Muzaffarpur

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

37. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office: Majhauliya Address :

MajhauliyaBazar

Via: Mare P/office: Majhauliya Bazar

District:

Gopalganj

841426

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Darbhanga 43. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Sudai Ratauli Address :

Sudai Ratauli

District:

Madhubani

Pin:

847402

BIHAR

State:

Zone:Muzaffarpur

Region: Siwan

Zone:Muzaffarpur

38. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Mubarakpur Address :

Mubarakpur

P/office:MubarakpurVia : Tajpur Phulwariya District:

Saran(Chhapra)

841209

Pin:

State:

BIHAR

Region: Darbhanga 44. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office: Chichi Buzurg Address:

Rajnagar , Hingh School

Chichri Road

Postoffice:

Rajnagar

District:

Madhubani

Pin:

847235

State:

BIHAR

Zone: Muzaffarpur

Zone:Muzaffarpur Region: Siwan

39. Central Bank of India

Nameof theBranch/Office:-Sindhwaniya Bazar Address vill .:

Bhatua Bazar

Postoffice:

BagahiBazar

District:

Gopalganj

Pin:

841425

BIHAR

State:

Region:Darbhanga 45. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/ Office :-Rahua Sangram Address :

Madhopur

Postoffice:

Madhopur

District:

Madhubani

Pin:

847408

State:

BIHAR

Zone:Muzaffarpur

Region: Darbhanga Zone: Muzaffarpur

40. Central Bank of India

Name of theBranch/ Office : --Dinmanpur Address :

Dinmanpur

Postoffice: Dinmanpur Via : Almashnagar District:

Samastipur

Pin:

848117

State:

BIHAR

Region:Darbhanga 46. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Malmal

Address: Makteb School Main Road Postoffice:

Malmal

District:

Madhubani

Pin:

847229

State:

BIHAR 2827

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Region: Darbhanga Zone:Muzaffarpur

47. Central Bank of India

Patpara

Name ofthe Branch/Office:

Address :

Patpara

Postoffice : Patpara Via : Rajnagar

District:

Madhubani

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Darbhanga Zone: Muzaffarpur

48. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Hatni

Hatni

Address:

Via: Ghoghardiha Post office: Hatni

Madhubani

District:

847402

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Motihari Zone: Muzaffarpur

49. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office: Barbal

AddressVill:

Barbal Narayanpur

Barbal

Postoffice:

District:

West Champaran (Bettiah)

845105

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Motihari Zone: Muzaffarpur

50, Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Taulaha Address :

Harinagar

Via : Ramnagar

Postoffice: Taulaha

District:

West Champaran (Bettiah)

845455

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Motihari Zone: Muzaffarpur

51. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Kandhwalia Address :

Ramnagar

Postoffice:

Bagahi

District:

West Champaran (Bettiah)

845106

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region: Motihari Zone: Muzaffarpur

52. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office : Shri Nagar

Dumri Bazar

Address :

Dumri Bazar

Postoffice:

District:

West Champaran (Bettiah) Pin:

845452

BIHAR

State:

824 GI/03-12

Region:Motihari

Zone:Muzaffarpur

53. Cetitral Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Patni

Address:

Mangalpur Patni

Pestoffice:

Ramgadhwa

District:

East Champaran (Bettiah)

845433

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Motihari

Zone:Muzaffarpur

54. Central Bank of India

Naftte oftheBranch/Office:-Devapur

Address:

Khoripakar

Via : Pacha Pakri

Postoffice:Khoripakar

District:

West Champaran (Motihari )

845427

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Motihari

Zone:Muzaffarpur

55. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office :-Dalpat Bishunpur Address:

BishunpurBlock Dhaka

BishunpurBlock Dhaka Postoffice:

District:

East Champaran (Motihari)

845427

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Motihari

Zone: Muzaffarpur

56. Central Bank of India

Name of the Branch/Office :-Kehuniya

Kehuniya

Address :

Postoffice:

Kehuniya

District:

West Champaran (Bettiah)

845453

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

Region:Motihari

Zone:Muzaffarpur

57. Central Bank of India

Name ofthe Branch/Office: Gora

Address:

ParsaFactory

Postoffice: Parsa Factory Via: Lauriya District:

West Champaran (Bettiah)

845453

Pin:

BIHAR

State:

58. Central Bank of India

Chhatisgarh College ,

Raipur Civil Lines , Byron Bazar,

District:

Raipur

Zone:

Raipur

Region:

(कृ. मो. मिश्र)

मुख्य अधिकारी ( राजभाषा ) 2828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

59. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, Mira Road Branch ,

SaiRidhi Complex,

NearMira Road Station , Mira Road ( East ),

Dist. Thane

Pin. 401107

Zone . MMZO, Region . Thane (61) . CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Tagore Public School .

Jaipur (Rajasthan)

Vaishali Nagar

Near Amrapali Circle,

Dist: Jaipur- 302 021

Zone: Delhi

61. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Geetanjali Public School .

Jodhpur ( Rajasthan)

Maudor Road,

MahaMandir,

Dist: Jodhpur-342006 Region: Jaipur

Zone:Delhi .

62. Central Bank of India Regional Office Dehradun AsleHali Dehradun 248 001 Uttaranchal

Zone Office Agra

63. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA (RegionalOffice)

G.S. Road , Bhangagarh, Shaktigarh Path ,

Guwahati : 781 005 Assam 64. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA BranchAgartala

Post Box . No. 22 ,

66 A , Central Road , Post. Office Agartala Distt. West Tripura

Pin: 799 001 , Tripura .

65. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA .

Branch Bapuji path ,

College Road, Sualkuchi Distt. Kamrup,

Pin: 781 403 Assam

66. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA .

Branch Barpeta Town, D.K. Road, Barpeta, Distt . Barpeta ,

Pin: 781 301 Assam

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 67. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA:

Branch Barkatalia,

Village Lichu Bagan,

P.O. Kunjaban Kathal Bagan,

Distt. West Tripura,

Pin:799 006 Tripura

68. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA .

Branch Chargola Bazar, V& P.O. Chargola Bazar ,

Distt. Karimganj ,

Pin: 788 708 Assam

69. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA .

Branch H.G.B. Road, Agartala, P.O. Agartala, Distt, West Tripura

Pin: 799001 Tripura

70. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA.

Branch Kokrajhar ,

Depot Road Kokrajhar

Distt.Kokrajhar,

Pin: 783 370 Assam .

71. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA.

Branch Loitungkhnou , P.O. Mantripukhuri , Distt. Inphal Manipur, Pin: 795 002 Manipur,

72. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA. Branch Mirza, Guwahati Goalpara Road, P.O. Mirza, Distt.Kamrup , Pin: 781 125 Assam

73. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA . Branch Maharipara , P.O.Maharipara, Distt. Kamrup, Pin: 781 366 Assam

74. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA .

Branch Nagarbera ,

P.O. Nagarbera, Distt. Kamrup , Pin: 781 127 Assam

75. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA .

Branch Nathkuchi

111 No. 1 Nathkuchi , P.O. Nathkuchi Via. Tihu,

Distt. Nalbari Pin781 371 Assam

76. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA.

Branch Naya Basti ,

Vand P.O. Damdama Distt. Nalbari , Pin: 781 349 Assam 2829

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

77. Central Bank of India

Branch Palenbari

VillagePalengbari

P.O. Patiładaha

Distt. Begaigaon

Pin: 783 391 Assam

78. Central Bank of India

Branch Chekon Bazar

Chassad Avenue

New Chekon Bazar

P.O. Imphal

Distt . Central Manipur

Pin:795 001 Manipur

79. Central Bank of India

Branch Panchgram

P.O. Panchgram

Distt . Hailakandi

Pin: 788 802 Assam

Andhra Bank

1. Andhra Bank

Dwaraka Branch

Plot No. 15, 101-107, Commercial Complex Sector 10, Dwaraka New Delhi 110045

2. Andhra Bank

Palem Vihar Branch

HBlock, Saini Plaza Palemvihar, Gurgaon-122017 Haryana

Andhra Bank ,

GurgaonBranch

3. SCOF 19 & 20 Sector 31-32 A Gurgaon-122001 Haryana

4. Andhra Bank

KarnalBranch

XIX-379Opp: Bus stand

GaganBuilding, GT Road Kamal (Haryana)

5. AndhraBank

PanipatBranch

SFC 48 sector 11-12 Part-1, HUDA Complex Panipat-132103 Haryana

6. Andhra Bank

PatialaBranch

9, Bhoopindra Road Near Phatak No. 22

Patiala (Punjab)

7. Andhra Bank

Rohtak Branch

SCF 15 & 15A HUDA Commercial Complex Rohtak 124 001

Haryana

8. Andhra Bank

St. Ann's School Branch

Butchi Rahi Palemonke

Vishakhapatnam-530027

Vishakhapatnam Dist .

9. Andhra Bank

Amadalavalasa

MainRoad

Srikakulam Dist. -532185

10. Andhra Bank

Mandavakurhi

Via Ponduru Srikakulam Dist. - 532168

11. Andhra Bank

Women's Branch Opposite Chandra Mahal

Srikakulam Dist . 532001

12. Andhra Bank

Palakonda MainRoad

Srikakulam Dist. -532 440

13. Andhra Bank

Rajam

MainRoad Srikakulam Dist. - 532127

14. Andhra Bank Ranasthalam

Srikakulam Dist. -532.407 علية

15. Andhra Bank

Srikurmam

Srikakulam Dist. - 532 404

16. Andhra Bank

Bhairi Singupuram Srikakulam Dist. -532185

17. Andhra Bank Kaspa Street

Veeraghattam

Srikakulam Dist. -532460

18. Andhra Bank Akkupalli

V. Kothuru Mandal

Srikakulam Dist. -532219

19. Andhra Bank Adapaka

ViaMurrapaka Ranasthalam Taluk

Srikakulam Distt. -532 304 2830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

20. Andhra Bank

Sancham Nagarapalem Sancham Panchayat ViaPydi Bheemavaram Devunipalavalasa Srikakulam Dist. 532409

21. Andhra Bank Devuni Altada ViaTekkali Vajrapu Kothuru Mandal Srikakulam Dist . 532211

22. Andhra Bank Pedatamarapalli NandigamaMadal Srikakulam Dist . 532202

23. Andhra Bank Regidi Palakonda Tq . Srikakulam Dist . 532440

24. Andhra Bank

Rajapuram ViaKavili

Srikakulam Dist. - 532 322 25. Andhra Bank

Jadupalli Mellikutti Mandal Srikakulam Dist. -532216 26. Andhra Bank

Cheedipudi Budithi Post Saravakota Mandal Srikakulam Dist . -532-427 27. Andhra Bank

Seethampeta PalakondaTq. Srikakulam Dist. -532 443 28. Andhra Bank

Siripuram Via Ponduru Srikakulam Dist . -532 168 29. Andhra Bank

Lolugu Via Ponduru Srikakulam Dist. - 532 168

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] 30. Andhra Bank Satyanarayanapuram Nageswararao pantulu Road Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada-520011 Andhra Pradesh

31. Andhra Bank Konakanchi Penuganchiprolu Mandal Krishna District Andhra Pradesh- 521 197

32. Andhra Bank Tiruvur MainRoad Krishna District Andhra Pradesh -521 235

33. Andhra Bank

AutoNagar 100 feet Road , Jawahar Auto Nagar Vijayawada Krishna District Andhra Pradesh -520 007

34. Andhra Bank

Jaggayyapet Krishna District Andhra Pradesh -521 125

35. Andhra Bank

Ibrahimpatnam Opp . Security Colony VTPS Main Road Ibrahimpatnam Krishna District Andhra Pradesh - 521 456

36. Andhra Bank

Vuyyuru MainRoad, Opp. Venkateswara Talkies Vuyyuru Krishna District Andhra Pradesh - 521 165

37. Andhra Bank

Hindi College Campus Batchupet, Machilipatnam Krishna District Andhra Pradesh -521 001

38. Andhra Bank Rangayyapparao Street P.B. No. 22 Andhra Bank Buildings Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh - 520 001 2831

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

39. Andhra Bank

5/33Main Road

Penemaluru Krishna District Andhra Pradesh - 521 139

40. Andhra Bank

Governorpet

23-6-853 , Besent Road Governorpet Vijayawada

Krishna Dist. Andhra Pradesh - 520001

41. Andhra Bank

Ahmedabad (Gujarat ) Housing Finance Specialised Housing Finance Branch, PlotNo. 149, Shop No. 42 Rudra Square, Ground Floor Near Judges Bungalows Bodakdev

Ahemedabad

42. Andhra Bank

Pune Housing Finance Branch CTS No. 1329+ 1349 108, First Floor, Om Chambers , Jungli Maharaj Road, Shivajinagar Pune- 411005.

43. Andhra Bank

Anand (Gujarat) Branch

Behind Central Bank, May Fair Road Ananad, Gujarat - 388001

44. Andhra Bank

Pimpri ChinchwadBranch

Ma Kalika Chamber, Plot No. 206 Near Umed Bhavan Pimpri Station Road, Pune Maharashtra - 411018

45. Andhra Bank

Shirdi Branch PimpleWadi Road, Opp. Talathi Office Shirdi , Ahmednagar District Maharashtra - 423 109

46. Andhra Bank

Nariman Point (Mumbai, Maharashtra) Corporate Finance Branch 33 , Atlanta NarimanPoint

Mumbai 400 021.

47. Andhra Bank

Vasko (Goa)Branch

LapazGardens Swntantrapath, Vasco-da-gama

Goa(State) Pin 403 802

48. Andhra Bank

MapusaBranch

Shop No. 13 , Ambrosio Centre

St. Jerome Road Mapusa-403507

49. Andhra Bank

RingRoad (Gujarat)Branch Surat, Ring Road Surat, Gujarat - 315001

50. Andhra Bank

Akota(Gujarat) Branch

G12, Silver Coin

Shri Shankeshwar Parashuram Marg (Opp.)BPC Road Akota, Baroda - 390020

51. Andhra Bank

NasikBranch

Suyojit Sankul

G-7 UpperGround Floor, Adjacent to Rajiv GandhiBhavan (NMC) Saranpur Road, Nasik-422 002

1 Small Industries Development Bank of India Commerce House , 1st Floor 7, Race Course Road New Palasia Indore - 452001

2 Small Industries Development Bank of India 5-9 89/1 & 2, 3rd Floor ChapelRoadPost Box No. 130 Hyderabad - 500 001

3. Small Industries Development Bank of India 480, Anna Salai , Nandanam Chennai - 600 035

1. Corporation Bank

Rohini Branch

C-5/6 , Sanjay Market Mangolpur Kalan Sector- 2 Rohini New Delhi - 110085

2. Corporation Bank

MundkaBranch

Plot No. 657 , Main Rohtak Road Mundka, New Delhi - 110041

3. Corporation Bank

Industrial Finance Branch

10thFloor, Hindustan Times House Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi -110001 2832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

4. Corporation Bank

Mahipalpur Branch E-52 & 53 , Mata Chowk Mahipalpur, New Delhi - 110037 5. Corporation Bank

Janakpuri Branch

C-5, C Block

Janakpuri

Pankha Road, New Delhi - 110058 6. Corporation Bank

Currency Chest Branch

WZ - G4/ 1 &G - A (NewNumber- Sector - 4/65 /A) Main Najafgarh Road Mahabir Nagar , New Delhi - 110018 7: Corporation Bank

CAPS Branch

F - 14, Flat No.- 210 & 211 , II Floor, Competent House Connaught Circus , New Delhi - 110001 8. Corporation Bank

Laxmi Nagar Branch

19 Sagar Plaza

District Centre Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi - 110092 9. CorporationBank

Friends Colony Branch

48, Community Centre Friends Colony NewDelhi - 110065

State/Union Territory - MAHARASHTRA 1. Indian Bank

Deccan Gymkhana

759/62 Parbhat Road Pune411004

2. Indian Bank

Cumbala Hills

56Gopalrao Deshmukh Marg CumbalaHill Mumbai 400 026

3. Indian Bank

Kamptee Collieries

NagpurDistt.

441404

4. Indian Bank

Kolhapur

1561 C Ward ShivajiRoad Kolhapur416002

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 5. Indian Bank

Nasik City

P. B No, 122 Swami RP Road Nasik422002

6. Indian Bank

Pimpalgaon PimpalgaonDukra Igatpuri Taluk Nasik Distt. 422 401

7. Indian Bank

Pombhurna ChandrapurDist . Maharashtra 442506

8. Indian Bank

PuneCity, 495 Mantri Heights Shaniwar Peth

Pune 411030

9. Indian Bank

Sadashivpeth

1025,BCD Sadashivpeth Pune411030

10. IndianBank

Sangli

43/4 High School

Road, Vakhar Bhag...... Sangli 416416

11. Indian Bank

Satara Gangasagar

219.Partapganj peth

Satara 415 002

12. Indian Bank

Nanapeth 612 B parsi.Agiary Nanapeth Pune411002

13. Indian Bank

Nagpur.

Gotmare Market

LaxmiBhavan Square, Dharampeth.

Napar440010

14. IndianBank : Ichalkaranji

PB No. 144 10/167 Main Road Ichalkaranji 416 115 KolhapurDist.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

15. Indian Bank

CircleOffice,

PBNo. 938 , ProgressHouse, III Floor, 54, Wellesley Road, Shivaji Nagar , Pune-411005

16. Indian Bank

PrabhaDevi

386, Block No. 1, Veer Savarkar Marg, Prabhadevi Mumbai -400025

17. Indian Bank

Andheri

11/21 , Madhav Nagar, S. V. Road, Andheri (West) Mumbai -400058

18. Indian Bank

Bandra

Shiv Sadan , 288, S. V. Road, Bandra (West) Mumbai -400050

19. Indian Bank

Bhayandar

SanjayPlace,

StationRoad, Bhayandar (W) , Distt. Thane-401 101

20. Indian Bank

SiddharthNagar,

VivekVidhyalaya, Siddarthnagar, Road 2, Goregaon (w) Mumbai-400062

21. Indian Bank

Chembur

71C, Sunder Govandi Road, Chembur, Mumbai -400071

22. Indian Bank

Ghonsa,

Ghonsa Village, Wani Taluk, Yeotmal Distt. 445314

23. Indian Bank

Dr. AmbedkarRoad, 601 E, PaiHouse, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Matunga, Mumbai -400019

2833

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

IndianBank

24.

KharDanda

Devi Takur Krupa, 369, LinkingRoad, Khar (West), Mumbai -400 052

25. IndianBank

Kalyan

Zojwala Shopping

Centre, Above Ramdev Hotel, AWing, I Floor, AgraRoad, Kalyan (W)-421 301 ::

26. IndianBank

JhuVile Parle Development Scheme, 12A Sagar Villa,

Jhu Vile Parle Development Scheme, Mumbai -400049

27. Indian Bank

King'sCircle

Shanmukhananda

HallBuilding, 292, Jayshankar YagnikMarg, King'sCircle, Mumbai -400022

28. Indian Bank

Mahim

482,Gardenview, MM Chotani Road, Mahim, Mumbai -400 016

29. Indian Bank

Malad

ReleSmruti,

679, S.V. Road, NearBabuline Mumbai -400064

30. Indian Bank

MatungaBazar

P. B. No. 6310 , 356, Bhandarkar Road Matunga, Mumbai -400019

31. Indian Bank

Wadala

205B, Paruthi Niwas, RuckRoad Wadala, Mumbai -400031 2834

32. Indian Bank

Prathana Samaj

Vijay Chambers , Tribhuvan Road, Opp.Dreamland Cinema, Mumbai -400004 33. Indian Bank

NRI Branch, Laxmi Building, SirP. M. Road, Fort Mimbai -400 001

34. Indian Bank

CBDBelapur, 30 , Sector 11 , CBDBelapur, Navi Mumbai -400 614 35. Indian Bank

Ulhas Nagar , Sangam Marriage, Hall, Shivaji Chowk, Ulhas Nagar -421003 Dist. Thane

36. Indian Bank

Bhiwandi

51,Mukta Kutir, Navi Chawl, Bhiwandi -421 302 Thane Dist.

37. Indian Bank

Vasai Road,

Dattareya Shopping, Centre , Station Road, Navghar, Vasai Road (W) , Dist . Thane-401 202 38. Indian Bank

Dadar

Radhakrishna Nivas , 11-12, Library Line, N.C. Kelkar Road, Dadar(W) Mumbai -400 028

39. Indian Bank

Goregaon,

A Wing, Ashoka Super Market, S. V. Road Aarey Road Jn , Goregaon (W) , Mumbai -400062

40. Indian Bank

Mulund, Trivedi Tower, IstFloor , Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Mulund (West), Mumbai -400 080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 41. Indian Bank

Lakhmapur,

Dindori Taluk, NasikDist. -422 202

42. Indian Bank

Mardi ,

Amaravati Dist .

444903

43. IndianBank

Sholapur,

11, Navipeth, Sholapur-413 007

44. Indian Bank

Shegaon,

ChandrapurDist.

422906

State/Union Territory - GUJARAT

45. Indian Bank

AhmedabadMain ,

P.B. No. 257, Mission Road, Bhadra, Ahmedabad- 380001

46. Indian Bank

Daxini Society

DixitBunglow, Mani Nagar, Ahmedabad-380 008

47. Indian Bank

Nadiad,

Santram Road,

Opp. fountain, Nadiad, Khera Distt. -387001

48. Indian Bank

Ashram Road ,

Maruthi House, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380 009

49. Indian Bank

Godhra,

Near M and M Mehta , High School , Baharpura , Godhra, Panchmahals Dist . - 389 001

50. IndianBank

Alkapuri

5, Sudhanagar , JetalpurRoad , Alkapuri , Baroda Dist.-390005 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2835

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

51. Indian Bank

Panoli,

L/913/7 , GIDC Panoli , Ankleshwar, Industrial Estate Bharuch Dist. -394 116 52. IndianBank

Surat

P.B. No. 376, RingRoad, BelgiumTower, Surat-395003

53. Indian Bank

Junagadh Mangath Road,

Panch Hatdi Chowk , Junagadh - 362001 54. Indian Bank

Bhuj

P.B. No. 33 , Station Road, Bhuj Kutch Dist. -370001 55. Indian Bank

Veraval

405/406, GIDC Veraval, Junagadh Dist. - 362 269 56. IndianBank

Bharuch

B- 10-3 , Station Road, Broach -392001

57. Indian Bank

Fatehgunj

MainRoad, Fatehgunj , Baroda-390002

58. IndianBank

Surasamal Patel Street, Surasamal ,

Khera Dist . -387 115 59. Indian Bank

Anjesar

Savil Taluka, Baroda Dist . -391 775 60. IndianBank

Athwa Lines

23-28 , Comer Point Complex, City Light, Athwa Lines , Surat-395007

824G1/03-13

61. IndianBank

CircleOffice

Navrang, Swastik

CharRasta, Gujarat University Road, Navarangpua, Ahmedabad-380009

62. Indian Bank

Paldi

Mukhi Corner,

PT college Cross

Road,Narayan NagarRoad, Paldi Ahmedabad- 380007

63. Indian Bank

Navrangpura

opp. Telephone

Exchange, CG Road, Navrangpura, Alimedabad-380 009

64. IndianBank

Mehsana

Janatha Super

Market, RajMahal Road, Mehsana-384001

65. IndianBank

Navsari

231-MG Road, Navsari, Valsad Dist . -396445

66. Indian Bank

Bhavnagar

Kantawala Dela, Undivakhar, Bhavnagar -364001

67. Indian Bank

Maskati Market

1552, Shripal Building,Khadia CharRasta, Gandhi Road, Ahmedabad-380001

68. IndianBank

Naranpura

5, Narsinh Park Society, Vijay Nagar CharRasta, Naranpura, Ahmedabad-380 013

69. Indian Bank

Davda Khera Dist. -387 350 2836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

70. Indian Bank

Panchot

Mehsana Dist . -384 205 71. Indian Bank

Valsad HalarRoad, Valsad-396001

72. Indian Bank

Piplag

Khera Dist. -387355 73. Indian Bank

Morvi

7/1/27 Jail Road, Morvi -363 641 RajkotDist.

74. Indian Bank

Jamnagar,

Kashi Vishwanath Road, Jamnagar -361001

75. IndianBank

Rajkot

" Toral " , Subhash Road , Rajkot-360001

Indian Bank

76.

Kanjoda

Kaira Dist . - 387 115 77. Indian Bank

Baroda

Prof. Manekrao Road , Raopura,

Baroda-390001

78. Indian Bank

Sachin

Sri Mahalakshmi

Complex, Station

Road , Surat Dist . -395 230 79. Indian Bank

Vapi,

C-5/47-70, GIDC

Selvas Road, Vapi, Valsad Dist . -396 195 80. Indian Bank

Porbandar,

Kastruba Gandhi

Marg , Manek Chowk , Porbandar, Junagadh Dist . - 360 575 81. Indian Bank

Anand

5/8/14, Station Road, Anand, Khera Dist . -388 001

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 82. Indian Bank

Gandhinagar

Block316, Sector 16, Gandhi Nagar, Ahmedabad- 382 016

83. Indian Bank

ServiceBranch

19/20,National Chambers , Ashram Road, Ahmedabad- 380 009

IndianBank

State/Union Territory

AndhraPradesh

84. Indian Bank

Hill Street

4-3-76/ 1-5 and 6 Hill

Street, Ranikung Secunderabad-500 003

85. Indian Bank

HimayatNagar,

P.B. No. 10103-6-150 ,

HimyatNagar,

Hyderabad-500 029

86. Indian Bank

Osmangunj ,

5-2-993/ 1 , First

Floor, Nizamshahi

Road, Osmanagunj ,

Hyderabad-500 195

87. Indian Bank

LashkarBazaar,

P. B. No. 110 ,

6-1-38,

LashkarBazaar-506 001

WarangalDist.

88. IndianBank

Darulshafa,

22-1-956 , Sultanpura, Sahifa , Darul Shafa ,

Hyderabad -500 024

89. Indian Bank

Falaknuma, 19-3-1076,

Shamsheergunj ,

Kalaknuma, Hyderabad-500 253

90. Indian Bank

Service Branch ,

1-2-597/ 2, First Floor,

Lower Tank Bund Road, Domal Guda, Hyderabad-500 029 2837

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Mallapuram

91. Indian Bank 4-42-3 Near ESI Hospital Nacharam MainRoad

Mallapuram 501 507 92. Indian Bank

BegumBazaar 15-6-211/4 Begum Bazaar Hyderabad 500 012 93. Indian Bank

Brahmankotkur

MainRoad

Brahmankotkur -518432 94. Indian Bank

Nandyal

428/2 Srinivasa Nagar, Nandyal- 518501

KurnoolDist .

95. Indian Bank

KakatiaNagar

9-4-84/ 11 Kakatiya Nagar,

Hyderabad 500008 96. Indian Bank

Prathkota

Kurnool Dist . 518 412 97. Indian Bank

Khammam

2-3-235 Sundar

Talkies Road, Khammam 507003

Indian Bank

98.

Barkathpura

3-4-854, Barkathpura Hyderabad 500 027 99. Indian Bank

Srinagar Colony

127 Srinagar Colony Road Hyderabad 500 073 100. Indian Bank Dilsukh Nagar

D. No. 17/109

Kamala Nagar Main Road, Dilshukh Nagar Hyderabad 500066

IndianBank

101.

Nizamabad

P.B. No. 124 7-1-62 Godown Road Nizamabad, 503001 Indian Bank

102.

Begumpet

6-3-852, Red

Cortege, Ameerpet Begumpet, 500016

103. Indian Bank

Narayanguda

3-6-943/2A, I Floor Narayanguda, Hyderabad 500 029

104. Indian Bank AsifNagar Main Road , Asif Nagar Karim Nagar Dist. 505 401

Indian Bank

105.

Molangur

Shankarapatnam

Mandal , Karimnagar Dist. 505470

106. IndianBank

Simapalli Nazamabad Dist . 503 164

107. Indian Bank

Paidimadugu via, Raikal, Karim Nagar, Dist 505460

108. Indian Bank

New Nallaunta

2-2-1130-24/1/A/ 1

Shivam Road Prasanth Nagar , New Nallakunta

Hyderabad 500 044

109. Indian Bank

Secundrabad

P. B. No. 1619 201 Karan Center

Sarojini Devi Road Secundrabad 500 003

110. Indian Bank

Mahboob Nagar P.B. No. 25, 2-2-123/ 18 , Clock Tower Road

Mahaboob Nagar-509 001

111. Indian Bank

HyderabadMain

5-1-679 Surabhi Arcade, Bank Street

Hyderabad-500 001 2838

112. Indian Bank

KarimNagar 3-5-404, Gandhi Road Karim Nagar , 505001 113. IndianBank

Shivampet(via) Toopran,Medak

Dist. 502 334

State/Union Territory-PUNJAB II4 . Indian Bank

Amritsar

42, Chowk Farid, Katra Sher Singh , Amritsar 143 001

115. Indian Bank

Arya Samaj Building Arya Samaj Road, Hoshiarpur 146 00 1

116. Indian Bank

Udhowal

MainBus Stand

VPO Udhowal 141315 JalandharDist .

117. Indian Bank

NRI Garshankar

RailwayRoad Garshankar 144 527 HoshiarpurDist .

118. Indian Bank

Jalandhar

922G. T. Road, Near General Bus Stand

Jalandhar 144 001

119. IndianBank

Jagraon

RajkotRoad Jagraon 142 026 Ludhiana Dist .

120. Indian Bank

Dugri

P.O. Model Town

Ludhiana Dist . 141002 121. Indian Bank

Kapurthala

TheMall Kapurthala 146 601

122. Indian Bank

Nurpur V.P.O.

Nurpur Teh. Nakodar 141 310 JalandharDist.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 123. Indian Bank

Bhoura Chowk,

Jalandhar By -Pass, G.T. Road

Bhoura, 141005 Ludhiana Dist .

124. Indian Bank

Phagwara

G.T. Road, Phagwara 144 401 KapurthalaDist .

125. Indian Bank

PatialaNear

AC Market

Adalat Bazaar

Patiala 147 001

126. Indian Bank

Khanna

G. T. Road (NearOld Bus Stand)

Khanna 141 401 Ludhiana Dist.

127. Indian Bank

Kalsinagar

1601, Kalsinagar G.T. Road Main Dholewal, Ludhiana 141003

128. Indian Bank

NRI Banga

Near Sant Baba Sewa

Singh Chowk Chandigarh Road

Banga 144 505

Jalandhar Dist.

129. Indian Bank

NRI Mahilpur

National Cloth House

Main Chowk , Bus Adda

Mahilpur146 105 HoshiarpurDist .

130. Indian Bank

Talwara SCF 10 -B Sector 2 , Talwara Township 144 216

HoshiarpurDist.

131. Indian Bank

Nakodar,

1941 Railway Road Nakodar, 141 310 JalandharDist .

2839

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

132. Indian Bank

Nawanshahar Doaba, Railway Road, Nawanshahar Doaba 144 514 Jalandhar Dist .

133. Indian Bank Nabha Cinema Road Nabha 147 201 PatialaDist.

134. Indian Bank

Bhatinda

Guri Kashi Marg Near Bus Stand

Bhatinda 151 001

135. Indian Bank

Hoshiarpur MCH 336 Roshnan Road Hoshiarpur 146 001

136. Indian Bank

Mallian Khurd

Talwandi Salem

Teh. Nakodar 144 623 JalandharDist .

137. Indian Bank

RupnagarNear

Kalgidhar Gurdwara

Rupnagar 141001

IndianBank

138.

Malri

VPO Malri 144040

Teh. Nakodar Jalandhar Dist .

139. Indian Bank

Moga, DhillonBuilding,

Opp. Jaidika Service Station, G.T. Road, Moga 142 001 140. Indian Bank

Ludhiana Chowk

ClockTower,

Ludhiana 141008

Indian Bank

141.

Sangrur Outside Dhuri Gate Opp. Naina Devi Mandir Sangrur 148 001

142. Indian Bank

Mohali Semi Conductor Complex, Phase 8 Industrial Area Mohali 160059 Ropar Dist.

143. Indian Bank Model Town Guru Nanak Khalsa, College for Women, ModelTown, Gujarkhan Complex Ludhiana 141 002

State/Union Territory-DELHI

144. Indian Bank

ServiceBranch 50-51 , Regal Building Parliament Street New Delhi 110001

145. Indian Bank

Rajouri Garden, F- 142Main Market Rajouri Garden New Delhi 110027

146. Indian Bank

Saket 264B/ 1 , Hauz Rani Market, Saket New Delhi 110 017

IndianBank

147.

West Patel Nagar

3/1 West Patel Nagar , New Delhi 110008

148. IndianBank

Padam Singh Road

6/92, Padam Singh Road, Karol Bagh New Delhi 110 005

149. IndianBank

CircleOffice

UpperGround Floor World Trade Centre BabarRoad New Delhi 110001

Indian Bank

150.

ST, Frances De Sales

School , A-3 , Block LocalShopping

Centre, JanakPuri NewDelhi 110058

151. Indian Bank

New Delhi Main, P45/90 Connaught Place

New Delhi 110001

Indian Bank

152.

Greater Kailash

13 Community Centre, Zamrudpur GreaterKailash I New Delhi 110 048 2840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

153. IndianBank

TilakNagar, 31Old Market TilakNagar New Delhi 110018

154. Indian Bank

Safdarjung Enclave

AB 20 Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110 029

155. Indian Bank

Defence Colony

A 261 , Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024

156. Indian Bank

HauzKhas

106 & 107 Aurobindo Place, DDA Commercial Complex New Delhi 110016

157. Indian Bank

MayurVihar

33 PratapNagar Mayur Vihar , Phase I Patparganj New Delhi 110 092

158. Indian Bank

Vikaspuri , G 27 DDA

Commercial Centre Near Sonia Cinema Vikaspuri NewDelhi 110018

State/Union Territory-BIHAR 159. Indian Bank

Garoul

GaroulVillage P.O. Garoul -847423 Via Putai DarbhangaDist.

160. Indian Bank

Kussaiya

P.O. Kussaiya

ViaKishanpur

Samastipur Dist . 848 301 161. Indian Bank

Gaya Goipathar Thakur

Bari, Tekari Road

Gaya823 001

162, Indian Bank

Narwara P. O. Narwara 843 128 ViaMinapur Sitamarhi Dist.

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] 163: Indian Bank

NewPatliputra

AlpanaMarket

Patna 800 013

164. Indian Bank

Muzzafarpur

P.B. No. 71

New Road, Moti Jheel Muzzafarpur-842001

165. Indian Bank

CircleOffice First Floor, Govind Bhavan, New Dak BunglowRoad Patna800 001

166. Indian Bank

BaileyRoad, PantBhavan BaileyRoad, Patna 800 008

167. Balua

BaluaP.O. BaluaHigh School ViaBalvania

Bhojpur Dist. -802 151

168. IndianBank

Jinoriya

P.O. Khairadeep

ViaDaudnagar

AurangabadDist. 824 114

State/Union Territory-CHANDIGARH 169. Indian Bank

NRI Branch

SCO 48-49 , Sector 9D, Madhya Marg Chandigarh 160 017

170. Indian Bank

Chandigarh Main

SCO 38-39 , Madhya

Marg , Sector 7C Chandigarh 160 019.

171. Indian Bank

Manimajra SCO 824 , NAC Shivalik Enclave Manimajra Chandigarh 160 101

172. Indian Bank CircleOffice P. B. No. 739 SCO 189-192 Sector7C

Chandigarh 160019

173. Indian Bank Sector 34 SCO 132-133 Sector 34A Chandigarh 160017 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Indian Bank

174.

Sector40

SCO72-73 , Sector40C,

Chandigarh 160 036

INDIAN BANK

State/Union Territory

Madhya Pradesh

Indian Bank

175.

Dewas

1B, First Floor, Moti

Bunglow , Main Road

Dewas 455 001

176. Indian Bank

Ratlam

PowerHouse Road

Near Saliana Bus

Stand, Ratlam 457001

IndianBank

177.

Bager

Block-Ashta

SehoreDist.

446116

IndianBank

178.

Ujjain

137 Nai Sarak

Ujjain456 001

IndianBank State/ Union Territory - HARYANA 179. Indian Bank

Sirsa

Seth Nabak Chand

Tule Ram Jhunthra

TrustBldg

HissarRoad

Sirsa 125 055

Indian Bank

180.

PintoLines

Air Force Station

Jawaharlal Nehru Marg

Ambala Cantt. 133 001

Indian Bank

181.

Sector 22

ΗNo. 540

Sector22

Faridabad 121 005

IndianBank

182.

Hissar

SCF 20

Red Square Market

Hissar 125 001

Indian Bank

183.

Panchkula

Estate Office

Sector 6

Panchkula 134 109

2841

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

IndianBank State/Union Territory

Jharkhand

Indian Bank

184.

Siladon

Village Rewa

Birhu Post 835 210

Thane Khunti

Ranchi Dist.

185. Indian Bank

Jamsedpur

PB No. 63

MainRoad, Bisupur

LICBuilding

Jamsehdpur 851 001

Indian Bank

186.

Ranchi

Sainik Bhawan

MainRoad

Ranchi 834001

Indian Bank

187.

Bokaro Steel , City

C27 City Centre

Sector IV, Bokaro

Steel City, Bokara 827 004

Indian Bank State/Union Territory

CHHATTISGARH

Indian Bank

188.

Bhilai

Plot No. 6

"B" Matket

Sector 6

Bhilai

DurgDist 490 006

Indian Bank

189.

Keduwan

Saraipali

Keduwan

Raipur Dist. Pin 493 558

Indian Bank

190.

Pendrawan

panchayti Bhawan

Pendrawan

Sarsiwa P O

Bilai Garh Tahsil

RaipurDist. 493 559

IndianBank State/Union Territory

ASSAM

Indian Bank

191.

Hatipukhuri

Nagaon Dist. 782 125

Indian Bank State/Union Territory

RAJASTHAN

Indian Bank

192.

Bhilwara

Jinendra

31-A Main Sector

Shastri nagar

Bhilwara 311001 2842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

Region-C

1. State Bank of Hyderabad, AnakapallyBranch , Anakapally, Distt-Visakhapatnam , Pin-531 002 .

2. State Bank of Hyderabad, Wadachipurupally Branch, Wadachipurupally , Distt-Visakhapatnam, Pin-530 021 .

3. State Bank of Hyderabad, Saligrampuram Branch, Visakhapatnam, Distt -Visakhapatnam , Pin-530 024 .

4. State Bank of Hyderabad, Sagarnagar Branch , Visakhapatnam, Distt-Visakhapatnam, Pin-530 043 .

5. State Bank of Hyderabad, Sriharipuram Branch , Visakhapatnam, Distt-Visakhapatnam, Pin-530 011 .

6. State Bank of Hyderabad, Bhubaneshwar Branch , Shahidnagar ,, Bhubaneshwar , Pin-751 007 .

7. State Bank of Hyderabad , Srikakulam Branch , Srikakulam, Distt- Srikakulam , Pin- 532 001 .

8. State Bank of Hyderabad , Arandalpet Branch , Guntur, Distt-Guntur , Pin-522 002 .

9. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kathpet Branch , Guntur, Distt-Guntur, Pin-522 001 ,

10. State Bank of Hyderabad, Tenali Branch, Tenali , Distt-Guntur, Pin-522 001 .

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] 11. State Bank ofHyderabad , Medikonduru Branch , Medikanduru , Distt-Guntur, Pin-522 438 .

12. State Bank ofHyderabad , Sattenapally Branch, Sattenapally, Distt-Guntur, Pin-522 403 .

13. State Bank of Hyderabad, A. T. Agraharam Branch, Guntur, Distt-Guntur , Pin-522 004.

14. State Bank of Hyderabad, Tadepallygudem Branch , Tadepallygumdem , Distt-West Godavari , Pin-534 102 .

15. State Bank of Hyderabad , Lallaguda Branch , Tarnaka High Road, Secunderabad-500017.

16. State Bank of Hyderabad, Taranaka Branch , Huda Complex, Secunderabad-500017.

17. State Bank of Hyderabad, P. G. Road Branch, Secunderabad-500 003 .

18. State Bank of Hyderabad, Vikrampuri Branch, Secunderabad-500 009.

19. State Bank of Hyderabad , Macha Bolaram Branch, Secunderabad-500010.

Region-B

20. State Bank of Hyderabad , Rauja Bagh Branch, Moulana Ajad College Campus , Near:Hotel Taj Residency, Harsool Road, Aurangabad, Pin-431 003 , Maharashtra.

21. State Bank of Hyderabad , Kolhapur Branch , Poornima Apartments , C/Ward/CS - 1429/4G Laxmi Puri , Sambhaji Bridge Road, Kolhapur -416002 .

2843

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

22. State Bank of Hyderabad , MIDC Waluj Branch , Plot No. X - 139 , Opposite Sterling Industries , Waluj , Distt . Aurangabad, Pin-431 136 , Maharashtra .

23. State Bank of Hyderabad, Dhanegaon , CIDCO Branch, Nanded-431 160 .

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Delhi Region

1. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 29/2, Vijay Enclave, MainPalam-Dabri Road, Dwarka, Delhi - 110 045 .

2. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 3399, Mahendra Park Chowk, Rani Bagh , Delhi- 110 034.

Bathinda Region

3. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Lead Bank Office, Outside Bagdadi Gate , Ferozepur City - 152002.

4. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Branch Kot Fateh , Vill. & P.O. Kok Fateh, (Distt.Bathinda) Pin- 151 001 .

Karnal Region

5. Oriental Bank of Commerce, M.L.N. College , Yamuna Nagar- 135001 .

6. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 66,Anaj Mandi , Kalayat, Distt . Kaithal , Pin-136 117.

7 Oriental Bank of Commerce, MainBazar , Radaur, Distt. Yamuna Nagar, Pin-132 133.

8. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Extn. Counter, Lall Maternity & General Hospital , ITI Road, YamunaNagar.

824 G1 /03-14

Oriental Bank of Commerce

Extn. Counter, A.S. Sr. Secondary School , Arya Samaj Chowk, Ambala City- 133 001.

10. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Extn. Counter, HUDA-Complex, S.C.O. -63 , Sector 8, Panchkula.

11. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Extn. Counter, Directorate of Correspondence Courses Kurukshetra University Distt. Kurukshetra, Pin- 136 119 .

12. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Extn. Counter, Inder Bhan (L) , Bharatari Education Society, G.T. Road, Panipat.

Dehradun Region

13. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Branch Chandan Koli , Teh: Deobank, Distt.: Saharanpur, Pin-247 554.

14. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 17, Saklani Mansion , RajpurRoad, Dehradun , Pin-248001.

15. Oriental Bank of Commerce, National Inter College, Vill. & P.O. Dhanauri , (Distt. Hardwar, ) Pin-249401.

16. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Vill. & P.O. Garhi Abdulla Khan, (Distt. Muzaffar Nagar, ) Pin-247343.

17. Oriental Bank ofCommerce , Vill. & P.O. Halalpur, Distt. Saharanpur, Pin-247001.

18. Oriental Bank of Commerce, P.O. Kankhal, Jagjitpur, (Distt. Hardwar, ) Pin-249408 2844

19. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Opp .Male Hospital, Jansath, (Distt. Muzaffarnagar) Pin-249408 .

20. Oriental Bank of Commerce, P.O. Mishrpur (Kankhal ), Hardwar- LaksarRoad, Jiapota, Distt. Hardwar, Pin-249408 .

21. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Vill. & P.O. Kakra, Distt .Muzaffarnagar, Pin-251318.

22. Oriental Bank of Commerce , G.T.Road, Khatauli, Distt . Muzaffarnagar, Pin-251 201 .

23. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Vill. & P.O. Lilon, Near Shamli , Distt. Muzaffarnagar, Pin-247776.

24. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Vill. & P.O. NaglaKabir, Teh . Jansath , Distt . Muzaffarnagar .

25. Oriental Bank of Commerce, MainMarket , New Tehri , Distt. Tehri Garhwal, Pin-249 148 .

26. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Vill .Rampur, RampurRoad, P.O. Roorkee, Distt. Hardwar, Pin-247667.

27. Oriental Bank of Commerce, LanghaRoad, Vill . & P.O. Rudrapur, Distt . Dehradun, Pin-248 197,

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 28. Oriental Bank of Commerce, HanumanRoad , Shamli, Distt Muzaffarnagar , Pin-247776.

29. Oriental Bank of Commerce , PaperMill Road, Sheikhpura Kadim, Distt Saharanpur , Pin-247 001 .

30. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Vill . Sherpur Khanajadpur, P.O. Chhutmalpur , Distt. Saharanpur, Pin-247662 .

31. Oriental Bank of Commerce, KumarTower, BHELRoad, RanipurMore, P.O. Jawalapur, Hardwar, Pin-249407.

32. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Chilkana More, Ambala Road, Sarsawa, Distt. Saharanpur, Pin-247232 .

33. Oriental Bank of Commerce , CourtRoad, Uttar Kashi , Pin-249 193 .

34. Oriental Bank of Commerce, KotaVillage, Deoband Road , Distt. Saharanpur , Pin-247551 .

35. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Chhoti Saraifaganj , Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar , Pin -842001 .

36. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Varma Centre, 1stFloor, Boring Road, Patna, Pin - 800001.

2845

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

सांख्यिकी और कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयन मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 26 मार्च, 2003

का. आ 1073.-लोक परिसर ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोक्ता की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) , की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम 1 में उल्लिखित अधिकारियों को राजपत्रित अधिकारी होने के नाते उक्तअधिनियम के लिए संपदा अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है, जो उक्त सारणी के कालम 2 में तदनुरूपी प्रविष्टि में विनिर्दिष्ट लोक परिसरों के बारे में उक्त अधिनियम के अंतर्गत या उसके द्वारा संपदा अधिकारियों को दिए गए कार्यों को पूरा करेंगे और प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे ।

सारणी

क्षेत्राधिकार की लोक परिसर स्थानीय सीमा की श्रेणियां अधिकारियों का पदनाम

(2)

(1)

भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान, कोलकाता की समस्त अर्जित तथा पट्टे पर ली गई सम्पत्ति।

भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान, बंगलौर की समस्त अर्जित और पट्टे पर ली गई सम्पत्ति ।

उपनिदेशक ( प्रशासन ) , सांख्यिकी और कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयन मंत्रालय, राष्ट्रीय प्रतिदर्श सर्वेक्षण संगठन, सर्वेक्षण अभिकल्प और अनुसंधान प्रभाग , महालनोबिस भवन , 164, जी. एल. टी. रोड, कोलकाता-700035 . उप निदेशक ( प्रशासन ) ,. राष्ट्रीय प्रतिदर्श सर्वेक्षण संगठन ( क्षेत्र संकार्य प्रभाग ) , क्षेत्र संकार्य प्रभाग , आंचलिक कार्यालय दूसरा तल, बी-विंग , केन्द्रीय सदन, (केन्द्रीय सरकार कार्यालय परिसर) , 17, मुख्य द्वितीय ब्लाक, कोरामोंगला, बंगलौर-560034.

अवर सचिव ( भारतीय सांख्यिकी संस्थान, कोलकाता का प्रभारी ) , भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान , दिल्ली की समस्त अर्जित और पट्टे पर ली गई सम्पति ।

सांख्यिकी और कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयन मंत्रालय, सरदार पटेल भवन, नई दिल्ली

[सं. एम -17011/6/2001- ब. और वि. ]

एन. आर. दास, निदेशक ( वित्त ) MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION

New Delhi , the 26th March, 2003

S.O. 1073.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants ) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column 1 of the Table below, being the Gazetted Officers to be estate officers for the purposes of the said Act , who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on estate officers by or under the said Act in respect of the public premises specified in the corresponding entry in column 2 of the said Table .

TABLE

Categories ofPublic Premises local limits ofjurisdiction Designation of Officers

(2)

(1)

Deputy Director (Administration)

All acquired and leased properties of Indian Statistical Institute , Kolkatta.

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation , National Sample Survey Organisation, Survey Design & Research Division , Mahalonobis Bhawan , 164, G.L.T. Road, Kolkata -700035.

2846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

(1)

Deputy Director (Administration) , National Sample Survey Organisation (Field Operations Division) , Field Operations

Division, Zonal Office , Ind Floor , B -Wirtg, Kendriya Sadhan (Central Government Office Complex), 17, Main IInd Block, Koramongla, Bangalore-560034.

UnderSecretary ,

( Incharge of Indian Statistical Institute , Kolkata) , Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, S. P. Bhawan , New Delhi .

विदेश मंत्रालय (सी. पी. वी. प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1074.- राजनयिक कोंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम 1948 ( 1948 का 41 ) की धारा 2 के अंक ( क) केअनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास, कुवेत में श्रीमति वीणा अग्रवाल सहायक को 06 मार्च , 2003 से सहासक कोंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं . टी.-4330/01/2003 ]

उपेन्द्र सिंह रावत, अवर सचिव ( कौन्सुलर) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. Division)

New Delhi , the 6th March , 2003

S.O. 1074.- In pursuance of the clause (a ) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officer ( Oaths and Fees) Act , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Smt . Veena Aggarwal , Assistant in the Embassy of India, Kuwait to perform the duties ofAssistant Consular Officer with effect from 06-03-2003 .

[No. T-4330/01/2003 ]

U. S. RAWAT, Under Secy . (Cons . ) स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 17 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1075.-केन्द्र सरकार ने भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में और राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र, दिल्ली सरकार से परामर्श करके डा. एस. एन. मिश्रा को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से तथा 26 जुलाई, 2004 तक भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद्के एक सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया है ।

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] (2)

All acquired and leased properties of Indian Statistical Institute , Bangalore.

All acquired and leased properties of Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi .

[No. M- 17011/6/2001 -B &F] N. R. DASH, Director (Finance) अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंधके अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्यमंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: - उक्त अधिसूचना में ' धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क) के अधीन मनोनीत ' शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत क्रम संख्या 25 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्:

राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र,

दिल्ली सरकार "

" 25. डा. एस. एन. मिश्रा, सी-140, प्रीत विहार, दिल्ली-110092.

[सं.वी -11013/1/2003- एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth) New Delhi , the 17th March, 2003

S.O. 1075. Whereas the Central Government , in pursuance of clause ( a) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the IndianMedical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) and in consultation with the Government of NCT of Delhi have nominated Dr. S.N. Misra to be a member of the Medical Council of India for the period with effect from the date of issue of this notification and upto 26th July, 2004.

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry ofHealth number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960, namely:

In the said notification , under the heading , 'Nominated under clause (a) of Sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 3' , for serial number 25 and the entries relating thereto , the 2847

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Ministry ofHealth number S.O. 138 , dated the 9th January, 1960, namely:-

following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely:-

Government ofNCT of Delhi"

"25. Dr. S.N. Misra , C-140. Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092

Inthe said Notification, under the heading, ' Elected under clause (b ) of Sub -section ( 1) of section 3 ' , for serial number 15 and the entry relating thereto the following serial number and entry shall be substituted, namely :-

[No. V- 11013//2003 -ME(Policy-1)] P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

Gauhati University" नई दिल्ली, 17 मार्च , 2003

" 15. Dr. K. N. Barua, Principal, Gauhati Medical College , Guwahati -781032 (Assam)

का. आ. 1076.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद्अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में डा. के. एन बरूआ, प्राचार्य, गौहाटी मेडिकल कालेज, गुवाहाटी को गौहाटी विश्वविद्यालय की अधिसभा द्वारा इस अधिसूचना केजारी होने की तिथि से 6-1-2004 तक भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् का सदस्य निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

[No. V- 11013/2/2003 -ME(Policy- 1) ] P.G: KALADHARAN, Under Secy. FootNote: ThePrincipal notification was published inthe Gazette of India, vide S.O. 138 dated 9-1-1960.

नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च, 2003

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या सं. का. आ. 138 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अंतर्गत निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत क्रम संख्या 15 तथा उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या तथा प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्:

गौहाटी विश्वविद्यालय "

का. आ. 1077.- दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप धारा (4 ) खण्ड (ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एत‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग- III में आगे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -

" 15. डा. के. एन . बरूआ, प्राचार्य, गौहाटी मेडिकल कालेज, गुवाहाटी-781032 (असम)

उक्त अनुसूची के भाग- III में में क्रम संख्या 81 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के बाद निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएगी, अर्थात्ः-

[सं. वी-11013/2/2003 - एम . ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव

डी.एम.डी.डिग्री * सीमेलवीयस यूनिवर्सिटी, बुडापेस्ट ।

भारत के नागरिकों के संबंध में डी. एम.डी. डिगी तभी

पाद टिप्पण: मूल अधिसूचना भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 9-1-1960 की का. आ. संख्या 138 के तहत प्रकाशित हुई थी ।

डी.एम.डी. डिग्री * यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ डेबरीशन, डेबरीशन

82. सीमेलवीयस यूनिवर्सिटी, बुडापेस्ट 83. यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ डेबरीशन, डेबरीशन

New Delh, the 17th March, 2003

एक मान्यताप्राप्त दन्त अर्हता होगी यदि यह 25 जून, 2002 अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो।

*डी.एम.डी. डिग्री भारतीय विश्वविद्यालय की बी.डी.एस. डिग्री के समतुल्य है । इस डिग्री की मान्यता 31 अगस्त, 2007 तक जारी रहेगी और संबंधित विश्वविद्यालय से अनुरोध प्राप्त होने पर उक्तकी समीक्षा की जाऐगी ।

S.O. 1076.-Whereas in pursuance of clause (b) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956 ) Dr. K. N. Barua, Principal, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, has been elected by the Court of the Gauhati University to be a member of the Medical Council of India for the period from the date of issue of thisnotification and up to 6-1-2004.

[सं. वी. 12018/2/2002- पी.एम.एस. ]

एस. के. राव , निदेशक Now, therefore, in pursuance ofthe provision of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the then 2848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 26th March, 2003

S.O. 1077. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b ) sub - section (4 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ), the Central Government , after consulting the Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendment in Part - III of the Schedule to be said Act , namely :-

InPart - III ofthe said Schedule after Serial Number 81 and the entries relating thereto , the following Serial Number and entries will be added namely:-

82. Semmelweis University, Budapest

D.M.D. Degree* Semmelweis University, Budapest

The D.M.D. degree will be a recognized dental qualification if granted on or after 25th June

83. University of Debrecen, Debrecen

2002 to the citizens of the India.

D.M. D. Degree* University ofDebrecen , Debrecen

* The D.M.D. degree is equivalent to BDS Degree of Indian University . The recognition of this degree will hold good upto 31st August 2007 and the same shall be reviewed on receipt of a request from the concerned University .

[No. V. 12018/2/2002- PMS] S. K. RAO, Director (ME)

भारी उद्योग और लोक उद्यम मंत्रालय (भारी उद्योगविभाग ) नईदिल्ली, 20 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1078.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम -4 के अनुसरण में , निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक, कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है : -

भारत हैवी इलैक्ट्रिकल्स लिमिटेड, पावर सेक्टर ( मुख्यालय ) कृभको भवन, द्वितीय तल, ए ० बी०-10, सेक्टर -1 , नोएडा-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश )

[सं. ई-11012/1/2001-हिन्दी]

आर० के ० सिंह , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRY AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES

(Department of Heavy Industry) New Delhi , the 20th March, 2003

S.O: 1078. In pursuance of Sub -rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purposes of the union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office whereof more than 80 % of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. , PowerSector (Hqrs . ) , Kribhco Bhawan, 2nd Floor , AB - 10 , Sector- 1 NODIA - 201301 (U.P)

[No E. 11012/1/2001 -Hindi ]

R.K. SINGH , Under Secy.

2849

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1079.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम, 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं: -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

2002-10-31

आई० एस० 384: 1979

1. आई० एस० 384: 2002- रंग रोगन और वार्निश के लिए सपाट बुश- विशिष्ट ( पाँचवां पुनरीक्षण)

2002-10-31

आई ० एस० 1342: 1988

2. आई०एस० 1342: 2002- तेल दाब स्टोव-विशिष्ट (छठा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 1363 ( भाग 1 ) : 2002

3. आई०एस० 1363 ( भाग 1 ) : 1967- उत्पाद ग्रेड " सी " के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियां भाग 1 षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले (साइज रेंज एम 5 से एम 64 तक) ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 1363 ( भाग 2): 1992

4. आई ० एस ० 1363 ( भाग 2 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड " सी " के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियाँ भाग 2 षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले पेंच (साइज रेंज एम 5 से एम 64 तक ) (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 1363 ( भाग 3) : 1992

5. आई ० एस ० 1363 (भाग 3 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड " सी " के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियाँ भाग 3 षटकोणीय ढिबरियाँ (साइज रेंज एम 5 से एम 64 तक) (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई० एस० 1364 ( भाग 1 ) : 1992

6. आई ० एस ० 1364 ( भाग 1 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए और बी के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियाँ भाग 1 षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले (साइज रेंज एम 1.6 से एम 64 तक) (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई० एस ० 1364 (भाग 2) : 1992

7. आई०एस ० 1364 ( भाग 2 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए और बी के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियाँ भाग 2 षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले पेंच (साइज रेंज एम 1.6 से एम 64 तक) ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण) 2850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आई ० एस० 1364 ( भाग 3 ) : 1992 2002-12-31 8. आई ०एस० 1364 ( भाग 3 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए और बी के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियाँ भाग 3 शैली 1 की षटकोणीय ढिबरियों (साइज रेंज एम 1.6 से एम 64 तक) (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

आई० एस० 1364 ( भाग 5) : 1992 2002-12-31 आई ० एस ० 1364 ( भाग 5 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए और बी के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियां भाग 5 षटकोणीय पतली ढिबरियाँ (शेम्फर न किए गये ) ( साइज रेंज एम 1.6 से एम 64 तक) (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

आई ० एस०/आई ०० प०ओ 4033: 1979 2002-12-30 10. आई ०एस ० 1364 ( भाग 6 ) : 2002- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए और बी के लिए षटकोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले, पेंच और ढिबरियां भाग 6 शैली 2 की षटकोणीय ढिबरियां

आई० एस० 1366: 1982

2002-12-31 11. आई ०एस ० 1366 : 2002- खांचित चीज शीर्ष पेंच- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

12. आई० एस० 1367 ( भाग 1 ) : 2002-

आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 1 ) : 1980 2002-12-31 इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधको की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें भाग 1 काबले , पेंच, स्टड्स और ढिबरियों कीसामान्य अपेक्षाएं

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

13.

आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 2 ) : 1979 2002-12-31 आई ० एस ० 1367 ( भाग 2 ) : 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधको की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें भाग 2 बंधकों के लिए छूटें- काबले, पेंच, स्टड्स और ढिबरियां- उत्पाद ग्रेड ए, बी और सी (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 3 ): 1991 2002-12-31 14. आई ० एस ० 1367 ( भाग 3 ) : 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें

भाग 3 कार्बन स्टील एवं एलॉय स्टील के बने बंधकों के यांत्रिक गुण धर्म- काबले , पेंच एवं स्टड्स (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 5 ) : 1980 2002-11-30 15. आई ० एस ० 1367 ( भाग 5 ) : 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्तिशर्तें

भाग 5 कार्बन इस्पात एवं मिश्र धातु इस्पात के बने 2851

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

बंधकोंके यांत्रिक गुण धर्म- सेट पेंच एवं समान चूड़ीदार कंधक जो तनाव प्रतिबल में नहीं (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 1367 ( भाग 8 ) : 1980

16. आई०. एस ० 1367 ( भाग 8 ) : 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्तिशर्तें भाग 8 प्रचलित बल आघूर्ण किस्म के इस्पात की षटकोणी ढिबरियों के लिए यांत्रिक और कार्यकारिता गुण धर्म

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 1367 ( भाग 10 ) : 1979

17. आई० एस ० 1367 ( भाग 8 ) : 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें भाग 10 सतही विच्छिन्नताएँ-ढिबरियाँ

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई ० एस ० 1367 ( भाग 11 ) : 1996

18. आई ० एस ० 1367 (भाग 11 ) : 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्तिशर्तें भाग 11 विद्युत निक्षेपित लेपन (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31 19. आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 14/अनु० 1 ): 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें

भाग 14 संक्षरण-प्रतिरोधी स्टेनलैस- इस्पात बंधकों के यांत्रिक गुण धर्म अनुभाग 1 काबले, पेंच औरस्टड्स

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31 20. आई० एस० 1367 ( भाग 14/अनु० 2): 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें भाग 14 संक्षरण- प्रतिरोधी स्टेनलैस- इस्पात

बंधकों के यांत्रिक गुण धर्म अनुभाग 2 ढिबरियाँ (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31 21. आई० एस ० 1367 ( भाग 14/अनु० 3): 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्तिशर्तें

भाग 14 संक्षरण- प्रतिरोधी स्टेनलैस - इस्पात बंधकों के यांत्रिक गुण धर्म अनुभाग 3 सेट पेंच एवं समान बंधक जो तनाव प्रतिबल में नहीं (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 16 ) : 1979 22. आई ० एस० 1367 ( भाग 16): 2002- इस्पात के चूड़ीदार बंधकों की तकनीकी पूर्ति शर्तें

भाग 16 बंधकों की अभिनाम प्रणाली (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

824 GI/03-15 2852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

(1)

(2)

23. आई ० एस ० 1501 : 2002- धातुओं की विकर्स कठोरता परीक्षण करने की पद्धति (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

24. आई ० एस० 1987 : 2002- फाउणिड्रयों में प्रयुक्त होने वाले उच्च सिलिका बालू- विशिष्टि

( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

25. आई ० एस ० 2063 ( भाग 1 ) : 2002- मशीन औजारों की परीक्षण संहिता भाग 1 रीति- भार रहित अथवा फिनिशिंग स्थितियों के अन्तर्गत प्रचालन करने वाली मशीनों की ज्यामितीय परिशुद्धता ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

26 . आई ० एस ० 2113 : 2002- चाँदी एवं चाँदी मिश्र धातुओं में चाँदी की परख - पद्धतियाँ

( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

27 . आई ० एस ० 2200 ( भाग 2 ) : 2002- परिवर्ती ऊँचाई की सारिणी सहित मिलिंग मशीनों की परीक्षण स्थितियाँ- परिशुद्धता परीक्षण

भाग 2 क्षैतिज तुर्क वाली मशीनें

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

28. आई ० एस ० 2200 ( भाग 3 ) : 2002- परिवर्ती ऊँचाई की सारिणी सहित मिलिंग मशीनों की परीक्षण स्थितियाँ- परिशुद्धता परीक्षण भाग 2 उर्ध्वाधर तुर्क वाली मशीनें

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

29. आई ० एस० 2269 : 2002- पटकोणी सॉकेट शीर्ष टोपी वाले पेंच (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

30. आई ० एस० 2673 : 2002- पिटवाँ एल्युमीनियम एवं एल्युमीनियम मिश्र धातुओं से बनी एक्सटूडेड गाोल नालियों के आयाम-विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

31. आई ० एस० 3470: 2002- हेक्सेन , खाद्य श्रेणी-विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

आई ० एस ० 3756 : 2002- 32. गियर संशोधन की पद्धति- बाहरी बेलनाकार गियरों में समानान्तर अक्ष सहित परिशिष्ठ परिवर्तन ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] (3)

(4)

2002-10-31 आई ० एस ० 1501 ( भाग 1 ) : 1984,

आई ० एस ० 1501 ( भाग 2 ) : 1984,

आई ० एस ० 1501 ( भाग 3 ) : 1987,

आई ० एस० 10927 ( भाग 1 ) : 1984,

आई० एस० 10927 ( भाग 2) : 1984,

और आई ० एस ० 10927 ( भाग 3 ) : 1991

आई ० एस ० 1987 : 1974

2002-12-31

2002-12-31 आई ० एस० 2113 : 1972

2002-11-30

2002-11-30 आई ० एस० 2201 : 1994

आई ० एस० 2269 : 1995

2002-12-31

2002-09-30 आई० एस० 2673 : 1979

2002-12-31 आई० एस ० 3470: 1966

2002-10-31 आई ० एस ० 3756: 1966 2853

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

2002-12-31

आई ० एस० 3810 ( भाग 1 ) : 1977

33 . आई० एस ० 3810 ( भाग 1 ) : 2002- ठोस खनित ईंधन-पारिभाषिक शब्दावली भाग 1 कोयला बनाने सम्बन्धी शब्द

( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31 34. आई० एस ० 4296 ( भाग 1 ): 2002- दाबन के औजार भाग 160 ° शंक्वाकार शीर्ष और सीधे रैंक वाले गोल पंच

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31 35. आई० एस ० 4296 ( भाग 2 ): 2002-

दाबन के औजार

भाग 2 बेलनाकार शीर्ष तथा लघुतर रैंक वाले गोल पंच

2002-12-31 36. आई० एस ० 4296 ( भाग 3 ): 2002-

दाबन के औजार

भाग 3 बेलनाकार शीर्ष तथा सीधे रैंक वाले गोल पंच

2002-11-30 .

आई ० एस० 4296 ( भाग 4) : 1967

37. आई ० एस० 4296 ( भाग 4 ): 2002- दाबन के औजार भाग 4 60 ° शंक्वाकार शीर्ष वाले सीधे रैंक वाले

गोल पंच

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30 38 . आई० एस० 4584: 2002- बालों के लिए बुश- विशिष्टि

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 4592: 1968

39 . आई ० एस० 4592: 2002- ओपन फ्रंट अभियांत्रिक पावर प्रेसों की स्वीकार्यता शर्तें- परिशुद्धता का परीक्षण

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई ० एस ० 4760: 1992

40. आई ० एस० 4760: 2002- द्रवीकृत पैट्रोलियम गैस के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू कुकिंग रेन्ज-विशिष्टि

(तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई ० एस ० 4762: 1984

41. आई ० एस ० 4762: 2002- बंधन सामग्री - सामान्य कार्यों के लिए वर्म ड्राइव हौज क्लैम्प- विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई० एस० 4948: 1974

42. आई० एस० 4948: 2002- सामान्य उपयोग के लिए वेल्डित इस्पात तार फैब्रिक- विशिष्टि

(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई० एस० 5131 : 1986

43. आई० एस० 5131: 2002- अग्नि शमन के लिए विभाजक बीचवाहिनी, नियन्त्रण सहित विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण) 2854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

(1)

(2)

44. आई ० एस० 5209: 2002- कोयला तैयार करने का संयंत्र फलोशीट के सिद्धांत और परिपाटी

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

45. आई ० एस० 5477 ( भाग 3 ) : 2002- जलाशयों की क्षमता निश्चित करना पद्धतियां भाग 3 सक्रिय संचयन

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

46. आई ० एस ० 5600 : 2002-

पम्प-मल जल और अपशिष्ट निकास विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

47. आई ० एस० 5780: 2002- विस्फोटी गैस पायुमंडलों के लिए विद्युत उपकरण आन्तरिक सुरक्षा "; " विशिष्टि

(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

48. आई ० एस० 5933: 2002- रोलिंग बेयरिंग - प्रणोद बेयरिंग - छूटें

(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

49 . आई० एस० 7112: 2002- बलुआ मिट्टी में अस्तर रहित नहरों की उनुप्रस्थ काट के डिजाइन का मापदण्ड

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

50. आई ० एस० 7160: 2003- पाठ्य पुस्तकों के लिए मुद्रण- क्षेत्र, हाशिए और टाइप साइज की संदर्शिका

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

51. आई ० एस० 7178 : 2002-

उष्मा उपचारित इस्पात टेपिंग पेंच - यात्रिक गुणधर्म (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )

52. आई० एस० 8034 : 2002-

निमज्जनीय पम्पसेट विशिष्टि

( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

53. आई० एस० 9079 : 2002- कृषि और जलपूर्ति के लिये साफ और ठंडे पानी के बिजली के मानोसेट पम्प विशिष्टि

(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (3)

(4) आई० एस० 5209: 1968

2002-12-31 आई ० एस ० 5477 : 1969

2002-12-31 आई ० एस ० 5600 : 1970

2002-09-30 आई ० एस० 5780 : 1980

2002-11-30

2002-10-31 आई० एस० 5933 : 1993

2002-11-30 आई० एस० 7112: 1973

2003-01-31 आई ० एस० 7160:

आई० एस० 7178 : 1990

2002-12-31 आई० एस० 8034 : 1989

2002-11-30 आई० एस० 9079 : 1989

2002-12-31 2855

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

2002-12-31

आई ० एस० 9127 ( भाग 2 ) : 1979

54. आई ० एस ० 9127 ( भाग 2 ) : 2002- बिटुमन ओर एन्थ्रासाइट कोयले के पेट्रोग्राफिक विश्लेषण की पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 कोयले के नमूने तैयार करने की पद्धति

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई ० एस० 9127 ( भाग 3 ) : 1992

55. आई ० एस० 9127 ( भाग 3 ) : 2002- बिटुमन ओर एन्थ्रासाइट कोयले के पेट्रोग्राफिक विश्लेषण की पद्धतियां भाग 3 मसिरल समूह संघटन ज्ञान करने की पद्धति

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-11-30

आई० एस० 9473 : 1980

56. आई० एस० 9473: 2002- श्वसन संरक्षी युक्तियां - कण सुरक्षा के लिए फिल्टिरिंग हॉफ मास्क विशिष्टि

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-12-31

आई० एस० 9551 ( भाग 3 ) : 1979

57 . आई ० एस० 9551 ( भाग 3 ) : 2002- उच्च तद्रुपता वाले श्रष्य उपस्कर एवं तंत्र न्यूनतम कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं भाग 3 लाउडस्पीकर

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2002-09-30

आई ० एस० 9920 ( भाग 1 ) : 1981

58. आई ० एस० 9920 ( भाग 1 ) : 2002- उच्च वोल्टेज के स्विच भाग 11 कि. वो. से ऊपर की तथा 52 कि.वो. से कम की रेटित वोल्टेज के स्विच

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-11002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सी. एम. डी.-1/13 : 2 ]

पी. दक्षिणामूर्ति, अपर महानिदेशक MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 25th March , 2003

S.O. 1079.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

2856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

SCHEDULE

SI. No

No. & Year of the Indian Standards established

No.& year of Indian Standards , Date of Establishment ifany, superseded by the New Indian Standards

(1)

(3)

(4)

1. IS 384 : 2002-

IS 384: 1979

2002-10-31 Brushes , paints and varnishes , flat - specification

(FifthRevision)

IS 1342: 1988

2002-10-31 2. IS 1342 : 2002 - Oil pressure stoves Specification

(Sixth Revision)

3. IS 1363 (PtI): 2002-

IS 1363 (Pt 1 ) : 1967

2002-12-31 Hexagon head bolts, screws and nuts of product grade ' C' Part 1: Hexagon head bolts ( size rangeM 5 to M 64

(FourthRevision)

4. IS 1363 (Pt 2) : 2002-

IS 1362(Pt 2) : 1992

2002-12-31 Hexagon head bolts, screws and nuts of product grade ' C' Part 2 : Hexagon head screws (size range M 5 toM 64

(Fourth Revision)

5. IS 1363 (Pt3) : 2002 -

IS 1363 (Pt3) : 1992

2002-12-31 Hexagon head bolts , screws and nuts of product grade ' C' Part 3 : Hexagon nuts (size range M 5 to M 64

(Fourth Revision)

6. IS 1364(Pt I) : 2002 -

IS 1364 (Pt 1 ) : 1992

2002-11-30 Hexagon head bolts , screws and nuts of product grade A and B Part 1 : Hexagon head bolts (size range M 1.6 to M64)

(Fourth Revision)

7. IS 1364 (Pt2 ) .:2002 -

IS 1364 (Pt 2) : 1992

2002-12-31 Hexagon head bolts , screws and nuts ofproduct grades A and B Part 2 : Hexagon head screws (size range M 1.6 to M 64)

(Fourth Revision)

8. IS 1364 (Pt 3 ) : 2002-

2002-08-31

IS 1364 (Pt 3 ) : 1992

Hexagon head bolts ; screws and nuts of product gradeA and B Part 3: Hexagon nuts , style 1 (size range M 1.6 to M 64)

(Fourth Revision) 2857 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

2002-12-31

IS 1364 (Pt 5) : 1992

9. IS 1364 (Pt 5) : 2002-

Hexagon head bolts . screws and nuts of product grade A and B Part 5: Hexagon thin nuts - product grade B

(Unchamfered) (size range (M 1.6 to M 10)

(Fourth Revision)

2002-11-30 10. IS 1364 (Pt6): 2002-

Hexagon head bolts , screws and nuts of product grade Aand B Part 6: Hexagon nuts, style 2

2002-12-31

IS.1366: 1982

11. IS 1366 : 2002-

Slotted cheese head screws - product gradeA

(Third Revision)

2002-12-31

IS 1367 (Pt. 1) : 1980

12. IS 1367 (Pt 1 ) : 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 1 : General requirements for bolts, screws and studs

(Third Revision)

2002-12-31

IS 1367 (Pt2): 1979

13. IS 1367 (Pt 2) : 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 2: Tolerances for fasteners bolts , screws studs and nuts

product grades A, B and C (Third Revision)

2002-12-31

IS 1367(Pt3 ) : 1991

14. IS 1367 (Pt3): 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 3 : Mechanical properties of fasteners made of carbon steel and alloy steel - bolts , screws and studs

(FourthRevision )

2002-11-30

IS 1367 (Pt 5) : 1980

15. IS 1367 (Pt5) : 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 5: Mechanical properties of fasteners made of carbon steel and alloy steel - set screws and similar threaded fasteners not under tensile stresses

(Third Revision)

2002-12-31

IS 1367 (Pt8) : 1992

16. IS 1367 (Pt8): 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 8: Prevailing torque type steel hexagon nuts - mechanical and per- formance properties

(Third Revision)

2002-12-31

IS1367(Pt 10) : 1979

17. IS 1367 (Pt 10) : .2002 -

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel 2858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

(1)

fasteners Part 10 : Surface discontinuities - nuts (Third Revision)

18. IS 1367 (Pt 11) : 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 11 : Electroplated coatings (Third Revision)

19. IS 1367 (Pt 14/Sec 1 ): 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 14 : Mechanical properties of corrosion - resistant stainless- steel fasteners Section 1 : Bolts , screws and studs

(ThirdRevision)

20. IS 1367 (Pt 14/Sec 2) : 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 14 : Mechanical properties of corrosion -resistant stainless -steel fasterners Section 2 :Nuts

(Third Revision)

21. IS 1367 (Pt 14/Sec 3 ) : 2002-

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 14 : Mechanical properties of corrosion - resistant stainless -steel fasteners Section 3 : Set screws and similar fasteners not under tensile stress

(Third Revision)

22. IS 1367 (Pt 16): 2002 -

Technical supply conditions for threaded steel fasteners Part 16 : Designation system for fasteners

(Third Revision)

23. IS 1501 : 2002-

Method for vickers hardness test for metallic materials

(ThirdRevision)

24. IS 1987 :2002-

High silica sand for use in foundries - Specification (Second Revision)

25. IS 2063 (Pt. I): 2002-

Test code for machine Tools Part 1 : Geometric accuracy ofmachines operating under No -load orfinishing conditions (Second Revision) 26. IS2113 : 2002-

Assaying silver in silver and silver allyos - methods (Second Revision)

27.. IS 2200 (Part 2) : 2002-

Test conditions for milling machines with table of variable height-Testing of accuracy Part 2: Machines with horizontal spindle (Third Revision) 28. IS 2200 (Part 3 ) : 2002-

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (3)

(4)

IS 1367 (Pt 11 ) : 1996

2002-12-31

2002-11-30 IS 1367 (Pt 16): 1979

2002-10-31 IS 1501 (Pt 1) : 1984,

IS 1501 (Pt 2): 1984, IS 1501 (Pt 3 ) : 1987 , IS10927 (Pt 1 ) : 1984, IS 10927 (Pt 2) : 1984& IS10927 (Pt3) : 1991 IS1987 : 1974

2002-12-31

2002-12-31 IS2113 : 1972

2002-12-31

2002-11-30 IS2201 : 1994

2002-11-30 2859

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1)

Test conditions for milling machines with table ofvariable height- Testing of accuracy Part 3 :Machines with vertical spindle

2002-12-31

IS 2269 : 1995

29. IS 2269 : 2002-

Hexagon socket head cap screws (FourthRevision )

2002-09-30

IS2673: 1979

30. IS 2673 : 2002-

Dimensions for wrought aluminium and aluminium alloys extruded round Tube- specifications ( Second Revision )

2002-12-31

IS3470: 1966

31. IS3470 : 2002-

Hexane, food grade-specification (First Revision)

2002-10-31

IS3756: 1966

32. IS3756: 2002-

Method for gear correction - addendum modifica- tion for external cylindrical gears with parallel axes (FirstRevision)

2002-12-31

IS 3810 (Pt 1 ) 1977

33. IS 3810 (Pt. 1): 2002-

Solid mineral fuels vocabulary Part 1 : Terms relating to coal preparation (Second Revision)

2002-12-31 34. IS 4296 (Pt. 1): 2002-

Tools for pressing Part 1: Round punches with 60° conical head and straight shank (FirstRevision)

2002-12-31 35. IS 4296 (Pt . 1): 2002-

Tools for pressing Part 2 : Round punches with reduced cylindrical head and shank

2002-12-31 36. IS 4296 (Pt. 3): 2002-

Tools for pressing Part 3 : Round punches with cylindrical head and straight shank

2002-11-30 37. 4296 (Pt4) 2002-

Tools for pressing Part 4: Round punches with 60° conical head and reduced shank (FirstRevision)

2002-11-30

IS4584: 1968

38. IS4584 : 2002-

Brushes , hair - specification

2002-12-31

IS4592: 1968

39. IS4592 : 2002-

Acceptance conditions of open front mechanical power presses - testing of accuracy (First Revision)

2002-11-30

IS4760: 1992

40. IS4760: 2002-

Domestic cooking ranges including grillers for use with liquefied petroleum gasses - specification (ThirdRevision)

2002-12-31

IS4762: 1984

41. IS4762:2002-

Fasteners - worm drive hose clamps for general purposes specification ( Second Revision)

2002-11-30

IS4948: 1974

42. IS 4948 : 2002-

Welded steel wire fabrics for general use-speci- fication (Second Revision)

200211-30

IS5131 : 1986

43. IS5131: 2002-

Dividing breeching with control for fire brigade use-specification (Second Revision)

2002-12-31

IS 5209 : 1968

44. IS 5209: 2002-

824 G1/03-16 2860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (1)

(3)

(4)

Coal preparation plant - principles and conven- tions for flowsheets (First Revision )

IS 5477 : 1969

2002-12-31 45. IS 5477 (Pt3): 2002- Fixing the capacities of reservoirs-methods Part 3: Live storage (First Revision)

46. IS 5600 : 2002-

IS5600: 1970

2000-09-30 Pumps- sewage and drainage-specification (FirstRevision)

47. IS 5780 : 2002-

IS5780 : 1980

2002-11-30 Electrical apparatus for explosive gas atmos- pheres- intrinsic safety " i " -specification (Second Revision)

48. IS 5933 : 2002-

IS5933 : 1993

2002-10-31 Rolling bearings-Thrust bearings-tolerances (Second Revision )

49. IS7112: 2002-

IS7112 : 1973

2002-11-30 Criteria for design of cross - section for unlined canals in alluvial soil (First Revision)

2002-01-31 50. IS7160: 2003- Guide for print area, Margins and type sizes for textbooks (First Revision)

51. IS 7178 : 2002-

IS7178 : 1990

2002-12-31 Heat-treated steel tapping screws-mechanical properties (Third Revision)

IS8034: 1989

2002-11-30 52. IS 8034 : 2002- Submersible pumpsets- specification (Second Revision)

53. IS 9079: 2002-

IS9079 : 1989

2002-12-31 Electric monoset pumps for clear , cold water for agricultural and water supply purposes-speci- fication ( Second Revision)

54. IS 9127 : (Pt2) : 2002-

IS 9127 (Pt 2) : 1979

2002-12-31 Methods for the petrographic analysis of bitu- minous coal and anthracite Part 2 : Methods of preparing coal samples (First Second)

55. IS 9127 (Pt 3): 2002

2002-12-31

IS9127 (Pt3 ) : 1992

Methods for the petrographic analysis of bitu- minious coal and anthracite Part 3 : Method of determining maceral group composition (Firstrevision)

IS 9473 : 1980

200211-30 56. IS 9473 : 2002- Respiratory protective devices-filtering- half masks to protect against

particles-spccification (First Revision)

2002-12-31

IS 9551 (Pt3) : 1979

57. IS 9551 : (Pt3 ) : 2002- High fidelity audio equipment and systems: ninimum performance requirements Part 3: Loud- spcakers ( First Revision)

58. IS 9920 (Pt 1): 2202-

IS 9920 (Pt 1) : 1981

2002-09-30 High voltage switches Part 1 : Switches for rated voltages abovc 1 kV and less than 52 kV

Copy of these standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Calcutta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Alumedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CMD -1/13: 2 ]

P. DAKSHINAMURTY, Addl. Director General 2861

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

पंट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 28 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1080.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा फ्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा पाइप लाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए गुरू गोबिंद सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी) द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और,केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइप लाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है , कोई ब्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से. जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी इस अधिसूचना की प्रतीत साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री राम करण शर्मा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइप लाइन, पंजाब रिफाइनरीज परियोजना , गुरू गोबिंद सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पंट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन की समनुषंगी) , 450, एम.सी. कालोनी , हिसार रोड, सिरसा 125055 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील डबवाली

जिला सिरसा

राज्य हरियाणा गांव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल हदबस्त नम्बर

खसरा नम्बर

कनाल मरला

हिस्सा (यदि कोई है)

5 औद्य

204

127/14

0-1 221

घुकांवाली

231

0-3

247

1-9

865

0-7 जगमालवाली

309

292

0-2 311

93/8

हस्यू

1-0

93/8

1-2

93/9

0-13

386

0-2

[फा. सं. आर-31015/6/2002- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 2862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/ CHAITRA 15, 1925

Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th March , 2003

S.O. S. O. 1080. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab , through Mundra Bathinda pipeline , a pipeline should be laid by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU ) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Karan Sharma , Competent Authority, Mundra- Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline , Punjab Refinery Project . Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited). 450 , M.C. Colony , Hissar Road , Sirsa - 125055 (Haryana)

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Dabwali

District :Sirsa

Hadbast

Khasra

No.

No. Name of village

204

Odhan

127/14 Ghukanwali

221-

231

247

865

309

292 Jagmalwali

Hassu

311

93/8

93/9

386 State: Haryana

Extent Kanal-Maria

Part/ Hissa No (ifany)

0-1

0-3

1-9

0-7

0-2

1-0

1-2

0-13

0-2

[No. R- 31015/6/2002-O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secу.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2863 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003 /चैत्र 15 , 1925

नईदिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल, 2003

का. आ. 1081.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसुचना सं.का.आ. 3400 तारीख 18 अक्तूबर 2002 , जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खंड 3 , उपखंड (ii) तारीख 19 अक्तूबर, 2002 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उन अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मैसर्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्राष्ट्रक्वर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा मैसर्स रिलांयस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, जो मैसर्स गैस ट्रान्सपोटेशन एंड इन्फ्राष्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड की संप्रर्वतक कंपनी है, के गोवा के उत्तरी/ दक्षिणी अपतट के खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्र प्रदेश में संरचनाओं से आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पूर्वी गोदावरी जिले के विभिन्न उपभोगताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और, उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 24 नवम्बर 2002 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना के संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन और इन्फ्राष्ट्रक्चर कंपनी में निहित होगा । 2864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

अनुसूची मण्डल: रायवरम

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

जिला : ईस्ट गोदावरि

गंव का नाम

स्वें नंबर

राष्ट्र : आन्ध्रप्रदेश ऐरिया

हेक्टेर

सब-डिविजन नंबर

1 1. नेडूरुबाडा

121

122

124

125

126

128

129

130

133

196

199

200

215

216

218

219

220

221

5 कल

ऐर सि-ऐर 4

80 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii )]

3 1

299

2. वेदूरुपाका

301

301.

318A

319

320

321

322

324

325

437

438

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

515

516

2865 4

45 11

10 0

05 0

85 0

60 0

45 0

30 0

0 2866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

516

2. वेदूरुपाका (निरंतर)

516

519

519A

531

532

536

537

538

540

541

542

543

कुल

3. लोल्ला

146

147

148

157

159

160

161

170

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

0°

10 [ भाग II- खण्ड.3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

171

3. लोल्ला(निरंतर)

176

177

180

181

182

187

मण्डल: अनपर्ति

जिला: ईस्ट गोदावरि

283

1. महेन्द्रवाडा

287

288

296

297

298

299

301

302

334

336

337

340

341

342

369

370

371

कुल

1 2. रामवरम

136

824G1/ 03-17

2867- 4

राष्ट्र : आन्ध्रप्रदेश 0

40 2868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

136

2 2. रामवरम (निरंतर)

137

145

146

156

157

192

193

198

199

200

3. पोलमारु

101

104

105

108

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 4

85 2869

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

108

3. पोलमारु (निरंतर)

109

110

133

136

137

139

140

142

कुल

मण्डल: मन्डपेट

जिला: ईस्ट गोदावरि

3 1. आर्तमारु

12342 2

75'

राष्ट्र : आन्ध्रप्रदेश 0

65 2870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

3 1. आर्तमारु (निरंतर)

107

116

130

131

132

133

134

कुल

[PART II- SEC . 3(ii) ] 4

75 2871

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

341

2. तापेस्वरम

341

342

352

3. इप्पेनपाडू

-43202222

123

131

133

कुल

4. पालटोडू

25 00

85 0

75 0

85 0

75 0

70 0

0 2872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

1 4.पालटोडू(निरंतर)

5 कुल

5. वेलगटोडू

5B 0505671212310 5C 5F

कुल

6. केसवरम

425

426

427

428

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 4

40 0

20 0

05 0

40 0

80 0

70 0

90 2873

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

429

6. केसवरम (निरंतर)

429

430

438

439

440

441

474

475

476

480

482

484

236

484

485

487

528

529

531

532

06 2874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

532

4 6. केसवरम (निरंतर)

533

534

536

कुल

मण्डल: सामलकोट

जिला: ईस्ट गोदावरि 1. मादवपटनम

144

145

146

155

156

160

164

165

166

कुल

2. बोयनपूडि

4C 346403425245 4A 4B

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

65 0

10 0

95 0

45 0

45 5

राष्ट्र : आन्ध्रप्रदेश 0

40 2875

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2. बोयनपूडि (निरंतर)

102

104

कुल

3. मामिल्लदोडिड

-12-12323-25

2/4

4A 124

824G1/03-18

10 0

35 0

90 0

55 0

50 0

95 0

50 0

3 2876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

4. वि.के. रायपूरम

191

192

कुल

5. जग्गम्मगारिपेटा

196

197

199

200

202

229

232

235

236

239

240

241

1 कुल

6. भीमवरम

249

253

254

255

256

258

259

260

266

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

05 0

55 0

10.

20 2877

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

269.

6. भीमवरम (निरंतर)

269

271

1B1

271

1B2

271

277

309

312

313

355

533

121

7. वल्लूारु

121

122

148

151

156

157

158

159

160

कुल

9. पनसपाडू

80 0

08 2878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15, 1925

33 9. पनसपाडू(निरंतर)

233845 3B

328910,

113

114

117

119

121

132

133

कल

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 4

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/47/02- जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक 2879

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 3rd April , 2003

S. O. 1081.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of 'Petroleum and Natural Gas, number S.O.3400 dated the 18th October, 2002 published in Part II , section 3 , sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 26th October , 2002, issued under sub- section ( 1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of the natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore of Goa and Structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of East Godavari District in the State of Andhra Pradesh, a Pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 24th day of November, 2002;

Andwhereas ,the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And further whereas ,the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying pipeline and has decided to acquire the right ofuser in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired, for laying the pipeline.;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4)of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on this date of publication of this declaration, in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited , free from all encumbrances .

2880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

SCHEDULE

Mandal: Rayavaram

District: EastGodavari

Name of the Village

SurveyNo

State : Andhra Pradesh AREA

Sub- Division No

3 1. Nadurubada

121

122

124

125

126

128

129

130

133

196

199

200

215

216

218

219

220

221

5 Total

Hectare Are C-Are 4

80 2881

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

299

2.Vedurupaka

301

318A

319

320

321

322

324

325

437

438

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

515

516

20 2882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

516

4 2. Vedurupaka ( Contd.)

516

519

519A

531

532

536

537

538

540

541

542

543

2 Total

3. Lolla

146

147

148

157

159

160

161.

161

170

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

09 2883

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

171

3. Lolla(Contd. )

176

177

180

181

182

187

Total

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: East Godavari

Mandal : Anaparthi

283

1. Mahendravada

287

288

296

297

298

299

301

302

334

336

337

340

341

342

369

370

371

Total

2. Ramavaram

136

1 824G1/03-19.

15 0

65 0

30 0

35 0

75 0

65 0

90 0

05 0

45 0

50 0

60 0

70 0

95 0

45 4

00 0

25 0

40 0 2884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

136

2 2. Ramavaram(Contd. )

137

145

146

156

157

192

193

198

199

200

1 Total

3.Polamaru

101

104

105

108

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

07.

85 2885

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

108

3.Polamaru(Contd.)

109

110

133

136

137

139

140

142

Total

District : East Godavari Mandal : Mandapeta

3 1. Artamuru

01 '

State: Andhra Pradesh

.05

0 2886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

3 1. Artamuru (Contd.)

107

116

130

131

132

133

134

1 Total

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

99 2887

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

341

2.Tapeswaram

341

342

352

Total

3. Ippenapadu

6---

123

43022235--6.

131

133

Total

4.Palatodu

85 0

90 0

60 0

40 0

70 0

30 2

40 0

75 0

60 0

55 0

35 0

0 2888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15, 1925

4. Palatodu (Contd.)

5 Total

5.Velagatodu

34-

1 Total

6.Kesavaram

425

426

427

428

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4

90 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

429

6. Kesavaram (Contd.)

429

430

438

439

440

441

474

475

476

480

482

484

485

6791423-23645

485

487

528

529

531

532

2889

80 0

55 0

60 0

25 0

90 0

35 0

75 0

35 0

40 0

65 0

40 2890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

532

4 6. Kesavaram (Contd . )

533

534

536

Total

Mandal : Samal Kot

District: East Godavari

144

1. Madhavapatnam

144

145

146

155

156

160

164

165

166

Total

2.Boyanapudi

4C 3440 4B

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

State: Andhra Pradesh 0

40 2891

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2.Boyanapudi (Contd.)

102

104

Total

3.Mamiliadoddi

2/3

2/4

-124

Total

824 G1/03-20

85 0

25 0

90 0

00 0

3 2892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5,2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

1 4. V. K. Rayapuram

191

192

Total

196

5.Jaggammagaripeta

197

199

200

202

229

1 10

229

232

1 0!

232

2 SS

232

235

236

239

240

241

Total

6. Bhimavaram

249

253

254

255

256

256-

256

608

258

345623 3 4 5 20

258

{

259

260.

266

1er

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 4

20 2893

THE

भारतको राजपत्र अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (il) ]

269€ 6.Bhimavaram (Contd.)

269

271

271 €

271

277 13

309

3128

3130

355

533 20

533A

5338 号

533

()

292 Total

121 8. Valluru

121 €

121

1218

121

1220

148 65

148-

1518

151

في

1510

156 5

في

156

157

158

1588

159

160-

160 as

219號 Total

21 9.Panasapadus

62 4

1 sa

hoa35

Como 13

85 0

1A 85

50 0

1B1

1B2

75 25

1.7

80 0

418

00 2

80 3 TB

4 та

1 82

283

00 387

55 50

80 308

413

70 528

4APC

65 2A

30 2C

60 2

101

210

5SET

1601

108T

55 308

95 4

65 5

60 14

40 6

90 7

80 1 2894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

3 9. Panasapadu (Contd . )

2333345 3B

113

114

-8910-1

114

117

119

121

37-5 5

121

132

133

Total

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

[No. L-14014/47/02-G.P. ] SWAMY SINGH , Director 2895

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल, 2003

का. आ. 1082- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड है, के गोवा के दक्षिणी अपतट (ऑफसोर) में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओं से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में, कोल्हापुर जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइझ बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि मे, जिसके भीतर रक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में र्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा (3) की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनत को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री एस. डी. भिसे, सक्षम प्राधेकारी, गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एण्ड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड, प्लॉट नं0 314, सोसायटी नं. आर. के. नगर, कोल्हापुर-416013 , महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा। 2896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15, 1925

अनुसूची तालुकाहातकणंगले

जिल्हा:कोल्हापूर अनु क्रमांक गांव का नाम

गट नं . / सर्व्हे नं.

उपविभाग क्रमांक

4 1 चंदूर

1266

1223

1186

1185

अ

1185

ब

1180

1179

1.178

1177

1176

1110

1112

ब

1116

2 हुपरी

1709

अ

182.4

351

392

394

228

545+546

478

3 इचलकरंजी

359

3क

358

351

अ

351

ब

346

331

23/1

295

286

1अ

286

1ब (2अ)

255

244

238

239

231

210

179

3व

143

137

4ब

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] राज्य:महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्र

हे

आर

स्क्वेअर मीटर

029 : 47

60 0

201 0

0.0%

85 2897 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1240

4 पट्टणकोडोली

1215

1210

444

5 तळंदगे

राज्य महाराष्ट्र

जिल्हा कोल्हापूर

तालुकाःशिखेळ

460

घालवाड

628

448

446

444

414

rak

413

27'2

270

27.1

667

2कुरूदवाड

767

774

1038

1118

1119

20101128

1262

Persentat

071

1562

1555

1551

0880

1691

1689

1295

नांदणी

1305

331

4शिरटी

333

349

2012

2848

5शिरोळ

2847

2849

2917

2916.

2750

0913

2702

ब

2544

019 !

2544

ड

2544

2314

2351 2898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 2

57 6 शिरढोण

1614

1658

389

99 7 टाकवडे

792

774

771

716

515

514

513

441

289

288

[फा. सं . एल.-14014/37/02-जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 3rd April , 2003

S. O. 1082.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of District Kolhapur in the State of Maharashtra, a pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure CompanyLimited

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri S.D.Bhise , Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited Plot No.314 , Society No.2 , R.K.Nagar , Kolhapur in Maharashtra State . Pin -416013 .

2899 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE 3 ( 1 )

State: Maharashtra

Dist: Kolhapur

Taluka: Hatkangale

Area

Sr.No. Village Name

Sqmt.

Are

Sub Division Hectare

GatNo./Survey No.

1266

1 Chandur

1223

1186

1185

1180

1179

1178

1177

1176

1110

1112

1116

1709

2Hupari

1824

351

392

394

228

545+546

478

359

3 Ichalkaranji

358

351

346

2A/1

331

295

286

1B(2A)

255

244

238

239

231

210

179

143

137

1240

4Pattankodoli

1215

1210

444

5Talandage

0 2900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

4 Taluka: Shirol

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 5

State: Maharashtra

Dist: Kolhapur

Ghalwad

460

628

448

446

444

414

413

272

270

271

2Kurundwad

667

767

774

1038

1118

1119

1120

1126

1262

1562

1555

1551

1691

1689

3 Nandani

1295

1305

4 Shirati

331

333

349

A+B 5 Shiroi

2848

2847

2849

2917

2916

2750

2702

2544

2314

2351

6Shirdhon

1614

1658

389

7 Takawade

792

774

771

716

515

80 2901

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

514

Takawade ( Contd. )

513

441

289

288

[No. L-14014/37/02-G.P. ] SWAMY SINGH , Director

नई दिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल, 2003

का. आ. 1083.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मन्त्रालय की अधिसूचना सं ० का० आ ० 2294 तारीख 11 जुलाई, 2002 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खण्ड 3, उपखण्ड (ii ) तारीख 11 जुलाई, 2002 में पृष्ठ 6869 से पृष्ठ 6898 तक पर प्रकाशित की गई थी , में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में:

"हुपरी" ग्राम शीर्षक के अधीन पृष्ठ 6872 पर 1.

(i) गाट सं० " 1706" के सामने, स्तंभ 3 के अधीन " अ " अक्षर के स्थान पर , " ब " अक्षर रखा जाएगा ;

(ii) गाट सं० " 1707" के सामने, स्तंभ 3 के अधीन " 1 " अंक के स्थान पर, "2" अंक रखा जाएगा ;

(iii ) पृष्ठ 6873 पर, गाट सं ० " 329 " के सामने , स्तंभ 4.5.6 के अधीन "00-35-04" क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर , "00-73-53 " क्षेत्रफल रखा जाएगा ;

पृष्ठ 6875 पर, " इचलकरजी" ग्राम शीर्षक के अधीन

(i) क्र सं० "299" के सामने, स्तंभ 3 में " 1 " अंक के स्थान पर, " 4 " अंक रखा जाएगा ;

2902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

पृष्ठ 6877 पर , क्र० सं० " 187 " स्तंभ 2 और स्तंभ 4,5 और 6 में "0-44-36" क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर, निम्नलिखित रखा जाएगा, अर्थात :-- (ii)

सर्वे सं०

सब डिवीजन 187

3 187

4 187

5 187

6 187

7 187

8 187

9 187

10 187

11 187

12 187

13 187

14 187

15 187

16 उपभोग के अधिकार का क्षेत्रफल

हे०

आर०

वर्ग मी०

(j) पृष्ठ 6879 पर , स्तंभ 2 क० सं ० " 116 " और स्तंभ 4, 5 और 6 में "0-52-12" क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर, निम्नलिखित रखा जाएगा, अर्थात : -

सर्वे सं०

सब डिवीजन 116

116

1 116

3 116

4 3

उपभोग के अधिकार का क्षेत्रफल

हे०

आर०

वर्ग मी०

पृष्ठ 6883 पर, "करूदवाड" ग्राम शीर्षक के अधीन

( 1) गाट सं० " 1117 " के सामने , स्तंभ 4,5 और 6 के अधीन " 0-07-20 " क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर, "0-02-25 " क्षेत्रफल रखा जाएगा ;

-2003

भारत कां राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

पृष्ठ 6888 पर , "शिरोल " ग्राम शीर्षक के अधीन-

7 .

(i) गाट सं ० " 2708 " के सामने, स्तंभ 4,5 और 6 के अधीन " 0-00-51 " क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर, "0-00-89 " क्षेत्रफल रखा जाएगा ;

(ii) गाट सं० " 2709 " के सामने, स्तंभ 4,5 और 6 के अधीन " 0-00-64" क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर, " 0-00-89 " क्षेत्रफल रखा जाएगा ;

( iii) गाट सं ० " 2710 " के सामने, स्तंभ 4,5 और 6 के अधीन "0-00-40" क्षेत्रफल के स्थान पर, "0-00-89" क्षेत्रफल रखा जाएगा ;

[फा. सं . एल.-14014/37/02- जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 3rd April , 2003

S.O S. O. 1083.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O 2294 , dated the 11th July 2002 published at pages 6898 to 6921 in Part II , section 3 , sub- section ( ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 13 July 2002 namely: - In the Schedule to the said notification: -

atpage 6900, under the heading village "HUPARI"

(i) against Gat No. " 1706" ,. under column 3 , for the word " A " the word "B " shall be substituted;

(ii) against Gat No. " 1707" ,. under column 3 , for the figure " 1 " , the figure " 2" shall be substituted;

(iii) at page 6901 , against Gat No. " 329 " , under columns 4,5 and 6 , for the area " 0-35-04 " , the area "0-73-53 " shall be substituted;

2: at page 6903 , under the heading village " ICHALKARANJI "

(i) against S.No. "299 " , under column 3. , for the figure " 1 ", the figure "4" shall be substituted;

(ii) at page 6905 , for the S. No. " 187 " , under column 2 and the area " 0-44- 36" in columns 4,5 and 6 the following shall be substituted namely: - 2904

Survey No. Sub division 187

187

(iii)

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Area of ROU

Hect

Are

Sq.mt

07.

at page 6906 , for the S. No. " 116 " , in column 2 and the area " 0-52- 12" in columns 4,5 and 6 the following shall be substituted namely: -

Sub division Survey No.

116

3 .

Area ofROU

Hect

Are

Sq.mt

at page 6910, under the heading village "KURUNDWAD "

(i) against Gat No. " 1117" , under columns 4,5 and 6 , for the area "0-07- 20 " the area " 0-02-25 " shall be substituted

at page 6913 , under the heading village " SHIROL "

(i) against Gat No. "2708 " ,. under columns 4,5 and 6. , for the area " 0-00-51 " the area " 0-00-89 " shall be substituted;

(ii) against Gat No. " 2709 " ,. under columns 4,5 and 6. , for the area " 0-00-64 " the area " 0-00-89 " shall be substituted;

( iii) against Gat No. " 2710 ", under columns 4,5 and 6. , for the area " 0-00-40 " the area " 0-00-89 " shall be substituted;

[No. L -14014/37/02 -G.P. ]

SWAMY SINGH , Director 2905

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल, 2003

का. आ. 1084. – केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962, ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में तारीख 20 अक्तूबर 2001 को भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम ओर प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ .2840 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थातः

उक्त अधिसूचना में , अनुसूची के स्तंभ । में " श्री रतनपाल सिंह , जिला राजस्व अधिकारी - सह - भूमि अर्जन अधिकारी , फरीदाबाद, " शब्दों के स्थान पर "श्री एम.एस.मान , जिला राजस्व अधिकारी - सह - भूमि अर्जन कलक्टर , फरीदाबाद " शब्द रखे जाएंगे ।

[फा. सं. आर-25011/22/2001- ओ.आर-1 ] रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th April , 2003

S. O. 1084. In pursuance of clause (a ) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2840 published in the Gazette of India on the 20th October , 2001 , namely :

In the said notification , in the schedule , in column 1 , for the words " Shri Rattan Pal Singh , District Revenue Officer- cum- Land Acquisition Officer , Faridabad " , the words " Shri M.S. Mann , District Revenue Officer- cum - Land Acquisition Collector , Faridabad " , shall be substituted .

[ No. R- 25011 /22/2001 - O.R. - I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

2906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]

APPEARANCSE :

श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2003

Kalyani Nayak, Advocate :For the 1st Party- Management .

Shri Harekrushna Mirdha . : For Himself- 2nd Party- Workman.

AWARD

का. आ. 1085.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . मित्रा एस.के. ( प्रा. ) लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 352/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

TheGovernment of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise of Powers conferredby Clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1) and Sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No L- 29012/ 121 / 1999/IR(M) , dated 19-05-2000:

[सं. एल-29012/ 121/99- आई. आर. ( विविध) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 5th March , 2003

"Whether the dismissal of Shri H.K. Mirdha by the Management of M/ s . Mitra S.K. (P) Ltd. , is just and proper? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

S.O. 1085. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 352/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/ s . Mitra S.K. (P. ) Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on05-03-2003.

2. The 2nd Party in his Claim Statement has pleaded his dismissal as illegal and that , the domestic enquiry conducted against him was not fare and proper , as he was not allowed to lead evidence. Moreover the punishment imposed on him is shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct committed by him, even ifit is accepted for the argument sake that he is found guilty.

[No. L-29012/ 121 /99 - IR(M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

3. The 1st Party- Management had filed their Written Statement. The 1st Party -Management has pleaded in their Written Statement that the domestic enquiry was conducted against the delinquent 2nd Party. He was found guilty and after observing all the formalities the order of dismissal was passed against him .

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Present :

4. On the above pleading of the parties, the following Issues have been setteled .

1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?

Shri S.K. Dhal , OSJS , ( Sr. Branch) , Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T. -cum- Labour Court , Bhubaneswar.

2. Whether the domestic enquiry held against the 2nd Party, delinquent was fare and proper ?

Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 352/2001

Date of conclusion of hearing 19th Feb. 2003 Date of Passing Award- 19th Feb. 2003

3. Whether the order of dismissal of Shri Harekrushna Mirdha, the 2nd Party passed by the Management isjust and proper?

BETWEEN :

4. What relief the workman is entitled to ?

TheManagement of the Director, M/s . Mitra S.K. (P) Ltd. , CITRoad, Calcutta -700014 .

: 1st Party-Management.

AND

5. When the case was posted for hearing , both the parties have filed the Memorandum of Settlement and have prayedto pass Award as per the terms of the Memorandum of Settlement . Memorandum of Settlement filed by the parties is placed which is read over and explained to both the parties. They have agreed to be true .

Their Workman

6. Reference is answered accordingly and the Award is passed as per the terms of the Memorandum of Settlement , which would form the party of the Award.

Dictated & Corrected by me .

: 2nd Party - Workman.

Shri Harekrushna Mirdha , Khurant , Balitut , Korakontabalari , P.O. Khunjkoti , Jagatsinghpur.

S.K. DHAL , Presiding Officer 2907

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Memorandum of Settlement

Form-H

(See Rule 58)

Representing Workman

Representing Management

1. Sri Hrudananda Sahu Accounts Executive , M/s. Mitra S.K. (P) Ltd. SisirikaBuilding

Madhusudan Nagar ,

1. Sri Harekrushna Mirdha S/o Murari Mirdha Vill.:Khuranta, Balitutha, P.S. Ersama, Dist. Jagatsinghpur.

Tulasipur, Cuttack -8

Short recital of the case

Adispute regarding dismissal of the workman was referred to the Court of the Hon'ble Presiding Officer, Central Government, Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar for adjudication to resolve the dispute between the management, M/ s Mitra SK (P) Ltd. and their workman Sri Harekrushna Mirdha .

Andwhereas during the pendency of the proceeding, the Management following its principle maintaining a healthy relationship with the workers & for their betterment, being approached by the workman conveyed their willingness for an amicable settlement in the I.D. Case No. 352/2001 .

Now in consideration of above, both the parties agreed to settle their disputes amongst them , out of Court, inpresence oftheir well wishers, in the manner laid down below.

Terms of Settlement

1. That Mr. Harekrushna Mirdha , the workman shall withdraw the I.D. Case instituted by him in the Court of the Presiding Officer , Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal Cum -Labour- Court , Bhubaneswar numbered asI.D. Case No. 352 of2001 against the Management and further undertakes not to raise any dispute whatsoever.

2. That the Management offers employment to Mr. Subhash Chandra Mirdha, the son ofthe workman , as Sampler in the company M/ s . Mitra S.K. (P) Ltd. , as per the provisions of the Companies Rules & regulation . The offer of appointment is annexed at Annexure-I .

3. That besides the employment of Subash Chandra Mirdha, an amount of Rs . 8,203/- , 2,146/-and Rs . 48,301/ vide D.D. No. 370863 dated 8-02-2003 , 508718 dated 08-02-2003 & 843105 dated 08-02-2003 drawn on State Bank of India are paid to Sri Harekrushna Mirdha towards Graduity & Provident Fund . The receipt of which is acknowledged by Sri Harekrushna Mirdha, the 2nd part separately.

4. That , it is further agreed that both the parties , shall filea Joint petition before the Presiding Officer , Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum Labour Court , Bhubaneswar , for withdrawal of the case in view of 824 G1/03-22

the present amicable settlement & further agreed that both the Parties will not raise any dispute in respect of the present dispute in any forum, this being the final settlement in respect of the above claim/case .

SriHrudananda Sahu, representing the management & Sri H.K. Mirdha the workman , reading the contents of the aforesaid settlement , under tanding their propriety, set their hands today i.e. 14th Day ofFebruary 2003 , in presence ofthe followingwithesses in their free will & mind without any coercion & pressure . Signature of the parties 1. 1.

Sd/-

Representing the Workman

Representingthe Management

Witness:

1. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

Mitra S. K. Private Ltd.

Surveyors , Cargo Inspectors & Analytical Chemists Sisirika Building, Tulsipur , Cuttack-753008

Gram : Mitralab Head Office :

Phone: 22439 (PDP) 300677, 300137 (CIC. )

Fax: (0671 ) 300677 R- 11 , C.I.T. Road, Kolkata - 14 Gram:Mitralab Assayers Phone: 244-5485,244-1339, Fax: 244-7482

Telex; 021-5587 Mitra in CK/12/2002-2003/613

10th February, 2003 Sri Subhash Chandra Mirdha

Reference to your application and subsequent interview you had with us, the management is pleased to appoint you as Sampler on compassionate ground with effect from 11-02-03. The terms and conditions of your appointment are as follows :-

1. You shall be on probation for one year from the date of appointment.

2. You shallbe paid salary and other allowances as per the rules of the company applicable to your category of employees during the probationary period.

3. On successful completion of your probationary period your service shall be confirmed by specifically writing to that effect.

4. At present you shall be posted at Paradip.

5. Your service is liable to be transferred to any ofthe other branches/locations of the Company or its associates.

2908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

6. During your tenure of service with us you shall notbe allowed to accept any other full time or part time employment/ engagement with any other Organisation .

7. Your service is terminable at a month's notice or notice pay in lieu thereof from either side .

You are advised to sign the duplicate copy of this letter as a token of acceptance of this appointment . ForMitra S.K. Private Limited.

Sd/- Manager

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1086.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट ऑथोरिटी ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुम्बई नं. 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11011/3/2000-आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 5th March , 2003

S.O. 1086. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 52/2000 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Mumbai No. 1 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 05-03-2003 .

[No. L - 11011/3/2000 - IR(M) ] B.M. DAVID, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1

Present :

MUMBAI Shri Justice S. C. Pandey Presiding Officer,

REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 52/2000

RTIES :

loyers in relation to the management of Addl . General Manager

Airport Authority of India V's.

Regional President , Airport Authority Kamgar

APPEARANCES :

For the Management

For the Union

: Shri Patil, Advocate : Absent

State

: Maharashtra

Mumbai , dated the 21st day of February, 2003

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

AWARD

1. This is a reference made to this tribunal by the Central Govt . in exercise of its power under sub- section 1(d) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Section 2A thereof. The terms of the reference are as follows:

"Whether the action of the management of Airports Authority of India, International Airports Division , Mumbai Airport, Mumbai in making different working hours i.e. five days pattern in Delhi Airport MT Workshop and six days pattern in Mumbai Airport MT workshop is justified or not ? If not what relief the union , Airports Authority Kamgar Union , Mumbai is entitled ? "

2. No one has appeared for the union from 17-7-2002. Thereafter , the case was fixed for hearings on 8-8-2002,4-9-2002, 16-10-2002, 28-11-2002 , 18-12-2002, 22-1-2003 and 1-2-2003 . The last notice was served on 3-1-2003 and acknowledgement has been received . No body appeared for Regional President Airport Authority Kamgar Union . No statement of claim is filed . In view of the above situation , it is concluded that no answer can be given in this reference as there is no longer any dispute .

S.C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1087.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के 'बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद नं. 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-43012/12/97- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 11th March , 2003

S.O. 1087. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 14/1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 1 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-03-2003 .

[No. L -43012/ 12/ 97-1R(M)] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 DHANBAD In the matter of a reference under Sec . 10( 1 ) ( d) ( 2A ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 Reference No. 14 of 1998 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2909

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd.

AND

Their Workman

PRESENT :

Shri S.H. Kazmi , Presiding Officer

his control and with full intimation to the management's authority, but even then not only the concerned workman was proceeded against departmentally, rather, by over- looking all those letters and communications sent from time to time, he was dismissed from his service also on the basis of wrong and perfuctory enquiry report . Lastly, it has been said that the action of the management is perfectly unjustified and the concerned workman is entitled for being reinstated with full back wages and other consequential benefits.

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers

: Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate.

For the Workman

: Shri M. Haque ,

Concerned Workman

himself.

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Copper

Dated , the 28th February, 2003

AWARD

By Order No. L- 43012 / 12 / 97 /IR(M) dated 1-4-1998 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute foradjudication to this Tirbunal:

"Whether the action of the management of HCL/ ICC Mosaboni Mines in dismissing the workman Sh . Moidul Haque vide Letter No. 27-9-95 is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled?"

2. Precisely, the case of the concerned workman is that he was permanent employees of the company HCL / ICC Mosaboni group of mines working since 25-5-1977 and all along during his service career he rendered unblemished service to the satisfaction of the management . It has been said that the concerned workman had taken earned leave from 24-7-95 to 29-7-95 but before he could have joined his duty, he was taken into custody on 29-7-95 by Mosaboni P.S. in connection with a criminal case filed against him on 27-7-95. As regards that, further it is said that the father of the concerned workman informed the management on the same day and the concerned workman also prayed for extension of leave but the same was not considered. It has also been said that not only the brother ofthe concerned workman repeatedly sent the letter to the management or the Enquiry Officer as regards judicial custody of the concerned workman , rather the concerned workman himself also informed the management through jail authority vide application dated 19-8-95 and 27-7-95 but having ignored all those communications made the Enquiry Officer proceeded with the domestic enquiry ex- parte behind the back of the concerned workman and submitted his report on the basis of which the order of dismissal was passed by the concerned authority . Further, itis said that the concerned workman remained absent and could not join his duty due to the circumstances beyond

3. The management's case , on the other hand , in short , is that the concerned workman was a technical assistant in quality control cell of the management and as such was holding an important post . It has been said that the concerned workman applied for leave from 24-7-95 to 29-7-95 and leave was granted to him . After expiry of the leave he was required to report for his duty on 31-7-95 as 30-7-95 was holiday, but he failed to attend his duty and remained absent without any sufficient leave or permission . Further it has been said that the management issued an explanation -sheet or chargesheet on 17-8-95 when he remained absent for more than ten days continuously without information or permission or sanctioned leave , but the concerned workman did not submit any reply to the said chargsheet within a reasonable time and after several reminders he submitted his reply on 18-9-95 . However, the said reply was not found to be satisfactory and the enquiry was ordered to be held but althrough the enquiry proceeding the concerned workman did not appear nor any step was taken on his behalf and ultimately the enquiry was fixed ex -parte against him . During the enquiry was fixed ex -parte against his . During the enquiry oral as well as documentary evidence was led on behalf of the management and finally the Enquiry Officer submited his report holding the concerned workman guilty of the charges levelled against him. Again a notice was issued to the concerned workman on the enquiry report calling representation from him and then after considering all materials on record the management took the decision to dismiss the concerned workman from his service . Further, it has been said that it is apparent from the materials on record that the concerned workman was afforded full opportunity but as neither the concerned workman himself nor anyone on his behalf appeared during the enquiry proceeding having full knowledge about the same and furhter as no cogent material was produced during the enquiry proceeding in proof of the fact that the concerned workman was injudicial custody during the relevant period there was no option for the Enquiry Officer but to proceed with the matter and submit his report. It has also been said that as per the provisions of the Certified Standings ofthe management continuous absence for more than ten days without permission is a serious misconduct and the Displinary Authority has been empowered to dismiss a workman for commission of such misconduct . In the instant case, lastly it is said , the action of the management was 2910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] fully justified as quite apparently there was a serious misconduct on the part of the concerned workman .

4. Before proceeding ahead it is significant to point out at the very outset that during the pendency of the present reference the issue relating to fairness of domestic equirywas taken up as preliminary issue. Both sides were allowed to adduce evidences on the said aspect then arguments were heard and ultimately vide order dated 21-12-2001 the domestic enquiry was held to be fair and proper. Therefore, in view of such development now the only question left to be considered for the purpose of disposal of the present case is whether on the basis of materials collected in course of the enquiry the conclusion ofthe finding arrived at by the EnquiryOfficer with respect to guilt ofthe concerned workman and then the dismissal ofthe concerned workman on the basis of the said report canbe held to be proper and justified or not.

by the brother of the concerned workman enclosing the photo copy of explanation sheet written by the concerned workman(marked Ext. M -3 during enquiry) , it was mentioned that the concerned workman was in judicial custody for serious charge and was unable to attend the duty. However, no any certificate etc. granted by the jail authority or any other document whatsoever was sent alongwith the said letter in proof of the said fact . Further it appears that no any letter was received by the management sent by the concerned workman through jail authority as claimed and it is only during the pendency of the present proceeding one letter has been filed on behalf of the workman which is marked Ext . W-4 and which appears to have been sent to General Manager (Mines ) , H.C. L. Through jail authority bywhich an information was given that upon getting bail hewas going to be released on 6-2-96. Even if authenticity ofthis letter is accepted, it is apparent that it was sent to the management much after the submission of the enquiry report and the dismissal of the concerned workman from hisservice . The enquiry report (Ext . M -6) was submitted on 19-9-95 and the letter of dismissal (Ext . M - 11 / I ) is dated 27-9-95.

5.Onbehalf of the management few documents have been produced and those are either enquiry notice , explanation- sheet , reply to the explanation , documents relating to enquiry proceeding , enquiry report or dismissal letter etc. which are marked Exts . M- 1 to M- 13 . Likewise few documents , were filed on behalf of the workman also , such as, charge -sheet filed in the criminal case few letters sent by the brother of the concerned workman to the management , letters sent by the concerned workmen to the management through jail custody etc. and those are marked Ext. W- 1 to W.7 / 1 . Having gone through the materials produced it is evident that the concerned workman applied for leave from 24-7-95 to 29-7-95 and the leave was accordingly granted to him . After expiry of leave he was required to report for his duty on 31-7-95 but he failed to attend and remained absent whereafter the management issued on explanation - sheet or charge - sheet on 17-8-95 under order 9 (viii ) of the Company's Certified Standing Orders for absence without leave for more than ten consecutive days .

Though from the side of the workman, as noticed above , the contention has been made that several communications were sent by the father of the concerned workman, brother of the concerned workman and even by the concerned workman himself from jail custodyto the management giving the circumstances under which the concerned workman could not attend the duty after the period of expiry of his leave but having gone through the enquiry proceeding ( Ext . M- 5 ) it appears that only two letters were received during the enquiry proceeding sent by the brother of the concerned workman, one was dated 30-8-95 and another was dated 11-9-95 . In one letter which was marked Ext . M- 2 during enquiry it was mentioned that due to some family feud the concerned workman was unable to attend his duty but now would be attending duties very soon. But in another letter dated 11-9-95 sent

Itisfurther significant to indicate that the reply to charge- sheet has been marked Ext . M - 3 which is said to have been sent by the concerned workman in his own handwriting and signature . Despite the fact that the concerned workman mentioned there in that he was in jail custody, his signature on the said explanation -sheet has not been attested by the jail authority as required. The concernedworkman who got himself examined as WW- I during evidence on preliminary issue has not said anywhere that he ever sent reply to the chargesheet . It appears that having considered the aforesaid communications and also taking into account the fact that in support of the assertion as regards jail custody no any document has been produced the Enquiry Officer held the enquiry ex -parte . During the enquiry one witness was examined on behalf of the management who happens to be the Asstt . Administrative Officer (Time office) and who was supposed to look after the attendance of the workman employed in the Engineering Department and other departments on surface. He stated clearly that the concerned workman was absenting from duty w. e. f. 30-7-95 and he had not been granted leave. He further stated that sometimes the management was given the information that due to family dispute he is keeping away from Mosaboni and sometime the information was givento the effect that he is in jail custody. Accordingto him, the relative of the concerned workman was asked to submit the proofofjudicial custody but they did not submit anydocument in that regard . He proved certain documents also, such as , chargesheet , explanation etc. Lastly, he has stated that due to such long absence of the concerned workman the work of the department is badly suffering because his job is technical which cannot be done by everybody. The Enquiry Officer appears to have considered 2911

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

all those relevant aspects borne out of the materials collected during the enquiry proceeding.

6. It can well be noticed that despite having knowledge about initiation of the departmental enquiry against the concerned workman no any document was produced to establish the fact about judicial custody of the concerned workman nor at any stage of the enquiry anyone appeared physically and tried to establish the said fact. Though the workman has claimed that he had sent letter through jail custody but there is no proof of the receipt of any such letter by the management. Even in the present case nothing has been filed to show that any letter was sent to the management through jail authority prior to the enquiry or during the pendency of the enquiry or any certificate was produced granted by the jail authority concerning the judicial custody. Simply a photo copy of the order of the concerned court has been produced which shows that on the basis of compromise the said criminal case relating to the demand of dowry was allowed to be finally disposed of and the concerned workman was discharged from criminal liability.

sufficient force in the aforesaid submission. It is true that nothing was produced during the enquiry to substantiate the stand taken on behalf of the workman and since the report was to be submitted on the basis of the materials on record the same was submitted accordingly holding the concerned workman guilty of the said misconduct but at the same time it is also evident from the materials produced before this tribunal specially one letter (Ext . W -4) which was sent by the concerned workman to the management through jail authority informing about the bail granted to him in connection with criminal case that the concerned workman remained in jail custody during the relevant period. Further at this stage there is no denial from the side ofthe management to the said effect. Quite understandably because in the instant reference the concerned workman has now come up with the aforesaid document (Ext. W-4) which bears the signature and seal ofthe jail authority also dated 9-2-96 and further one another document which is a copy of the order of the court regarding the discharge of theconcernedworkman from the liability ofthe said criminal case. It is also not the case of the management that during his service career he had committed same misconduct or any other nature of misconduct earlier also for which he was dealt with departmentally.

Significantly even during the pendency of the present proceeding nothing has been produced to show that the concerned workman soon after the expiry of the period ofhis leave or within a reasonable period after his detention by the police applied before the management or sent any application for extension of leave or for any purpose whatsoever. Even if he was taken into custodybe could have very well sent an application in the said regard through jail authority to the management . There is no explanation forthcoming in this connection.

Thus , in view of the circumstances as indicated above, the punishment of dismissal of the concerned workman from his service can certainly be not held tobe proportionate to the gravity of charge levelled against him. Forthe ends ofjustice the same , as such , needs appropriate modification. Considering the totality of the circumstances , in my view, interest of justice would be served if the punishment as awarded is modified to the extent of denial of back wages to the concerned workman upon his reinstatement in the services of the management.

Therefore, in view of all the aforesaid it is finally concluded that the dismissal of the concerned workman from his service is not justified and he , as such , deserves reinstatement but of course without back wages .

8. The award is , thus , rendered as hereunder: -

The action of the management of HCL /ICC Mosaboni Mines in dismissing the concerned workman, Moidul Haque , is not justified and the concerned workman deserves to be reinstated in the service ofthe management but without back wages . Consequently, the management ishereby directed to reinstate the concerned workman without back wages within 30 days from the date of publication of the award.

As out of the two letters sent by the brother of the concerned workman in one the reason for the absence was given as family fued and in another judicial custody in connection with a criminal case and as nothing was produced to establish the jail custody of the concerned workman and further as the sanctioned period lapsed in the meantime and the work of department was suffering due to continuous absence of the concerned workman whose work was technical , if the Enquiry Officer firstly decided to proceed with the matter ex -parte and then subsequentiy found the concerned workman guilty of the alleged misconduct on the basis of the material collected during the enquiry then there was nothing wrong done by him and conclusion arrived at by him certainly does not warrant any inter erence . He was required to proceed and submit his report confining himself to the materials produced before him. He arrears to have done the same and so his report does not suffer from any infirmity.

In the circumstances of the case , however, there would be no order as to cost .

S.H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer.

7. It has been urged on behalf of the workman that the extreme punishment of dismissal as awarded to the concerned workman is not only harsh , rather quite disproportionate to the gravity of the charge levelled against him. As far as this aspect is concerned I find 2912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2003

further proceedings in this Court started and the evidence wasrecorded.

का. आ. 1088.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नागपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या 154/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-3-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/194/94- आई- आर( सी- II ) ]

Inthe Statement of Claim filed by the workman Sheikh Sahid S/o Sheikh Farid, it is mentioned that the workman was appointed at Durgapur O/C Mine . In 1990 hewas transferred to Hindustan Lalpeth Colliery of WCL. He moved serveral applications for his transfer to Durgapur. It is further mentioned that the workman was in loss in his wages and this harrasment affected upon his health due to which he fell ill.

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th March, 2003

S.O. 1088.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 154/2000 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal , cum-Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of W.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 05-03-2003.

[No. L - 22012/ 194/94 - IR (C - II ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

From December , 1990 to March, 1991 he took treatment from the hospital of Colliery. After that he took treatment from Dr. G.V. Wasalwar. He recovered from illness . After one or two months he again fell ill and was under the treatment of Dr. M.S. Jaiswal . Chargesheet was issued to him on 01-12-91 for his unauthorised absence . He remained absent from 29-06-91 . The workman further stated that enquiry has started against him and four to five dates were given to him for his appearance . On 03-12-92 he sent a Registered Letter that he was under the treatment ofDr. D.K. Kadasne at Nagpur due to light mental effect from 20-06-92 to 19-05-93 i.e. for 1 (one ) year . After getting Fitness Certificate , he met with the Manager of Hindustan Lalpeth Colliery but he was not heard.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR

Departmental enquiry was completed exparte and he was dismissed from service from 24-05-93 . The workman stated that his dismissal was not justified. He claimed reinstatement with backwages from 24-05-93.

PRESENT : SHRI B.G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer

REFERENCE No. CGIT : 154/2000 THE SUB AREA MANAGER, W.C.L. AND SHRI SHEIKH SAHID S / O SHEIKH FARID AWARD

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1 ) and Sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial dispute Act, 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide order No. L - 22012 ( 194 )/94 - IR (C-II ) dt . 28-09-94 on following schedule .

SCHEDULE

The management contested the case and mentioned in the Written Statement that Sheikh Sahid was working as EPGH ( Excavation Plant Greaser cum Helper at Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast Mine of WCL) . He was working at the Heavy Earth Moving Machinery Section in the maintenance and repair of Heavy Earth Moving Machinery such as Dozers , Dumpers , Drills and Excavators etc. his job was important and specialised, directly connected with the production of coal from the Open Cast Mine . At the workman has come on transfer from Durgapur , he was indiferrent in his work and started remaining unauthorisely absent quite often without obtaining any sanction of leave and permission from Controlling Officer. He was in the habit of remaining absent authorisely . From 29-06-91 he remained absent and chargesheet was issued to him dt . 06-10-91 / 01-12-91 . He submitted his reply on 17-12-92 stating therein that he was sick. Now he has become fully fitto resume his duty but he did not report for his duty.

"Whether the action of management of Project Officer, Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast Mine of WCL , Chandrapur vide letter No. WCL /CHA/ HLOC /PO/ 1493 of 22-05-93 in dismissing the service of Sh . Sheikh Sahid S/ o Sheikh Farid is justified or not ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled for ? "

This reference was sent to CGIT Court No - I at Bombay by Ministry of Labour , New Delhi in September, 1994. This file was received by transfer at CGIT, Nagpur in June , 2000 and notices were issued to the parties on 29-06-2000 to appear in the Court on 31-07-2000 . The

On 16-06-92 Sheikh Sahid reported for duty and worked for half a day only . He again absented himself. He didnot turn upbefore the Enquiry Officer . On 12-10-92 he represented his inability to attend enquiry. Again on 03-11-92 and 28-11-92 he did not turn up . The enquiry was again adjourned to 13-02-93 but he did not turn up. On 15-02-93 the evidence of management was recorded.

2913

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

therefore avoided to depose in this Court that Sheikh Sahid wasunder his treatment for one year i.e. from 20-06-92 to 19-05-93 .

On 09-05-93 Enquiry Officer submited his report and Sheikh Sahid was dismissed from his service ofWCL w.e.f. 24-05-93 vide order of dismissal No. WCL/CHA/ HLOC/PO/ 1493 dt. 22/23-05-93 . The workman himself absented from duty and did not submit original Medical Certificate of illness & before the Enquiry Officer due to which he was dismissed .

The management witness Y. Ganapathi has stated that he had informed several times, about the dates fixed in the enquiry to the workman Sheikh Sahid but he did not appear in the enquiry proceedings. The workman also did not submit the original Medical Certificate dt . 01-12-92 before him during the enquiry proceedings .

Both the parties submitted Oral and Documentary evidence in this Court . Sheikh Sahid workman submitted his affidavit on 05-11-96 . He was cross examined on 03-03-97 by the counsel of WCL. The workman also submitted the affidavit of Dr. D.K. Kadasne on 10-01-01 but he did not produce the witness for cross examination. Management submitted affidavit of Y. Ganapathy, Enquiry Officer. He was cross examined by the advocate of the workman on 14-03-2002 . Both the parties also submitted their Written Arguments . Their advocates also argued the case orally .

I have considered the entire oral and documentary evidence on record and the arguments submitted by the parties.

The above evidence on record therefore shows that the workman Sheikh Sahid did not himself participate in the enquiry.He did not submit any reliable evidence before the Enquiry Officer regarding his illness during the enquiry proceedings or from the date of his unauthorised absence mentioned in the chargesheet. The counsel for the management has argued that in the certificate dt. 01-12-92 the doctor has not mentioned, the duration for which Sheikh Sahid remained in his treatment . The original certificatedt. 01-12-92 was not produced by the workman before the Enquiry Officer. In the above circumstances the workman himself failed to produce reliable evidence regarding his illness , for the period mentioned in the chargesheetdt . 01-12-91 . In the above circumstances the enquiry was conducted fairly and properly by the Enquiry Officer. The findings of the Enquiry Officer are based on the evidence produced before him . The action of the management for dismissing the workman from 24-05-93 istherefore justified.

ORDER

The workman Sheikh Sahid admitted in cross examination that he has received chargesheet for absence from duty from 01-05-90 to June . 91. He had submitted also reply of the chargesheet, dated 1-12-91 . He had also received letter dt . 12-04-92 from the management . The Enquiry Officer had also issued him letter No. 587 dt . 28-09-92 for fixing the hearing of enquiry on 12-10-92 . He had also received letterdt. 21-10-92 for hearing in the enquiry on 03-11-92 . He does not know whether he had sent any Medical Certificate to the Enquiry Officer when he wrote a letter to him for adjourning the hearing on 03- 11-92.He did not appear in the enquiry proceedings before the Enquiry Officer .

The action of the management of Project Officer , Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast Mine of WCL, Chandrapur vide order dt. 22/23-05-93 in dismissing the service of Sheikh Sahid S/ o Sheikh Farid w.e.f. 24-05-93 is legal, proper and justified . the workman is not entitled to any relief claimed by him .

The reference is answered accordingly. Date : 20-2-03 B.G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1089.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नागपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या 133/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/306/ 98- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th March , 2003 He further says that he did not receive any treatment from any Mental Hospital. He does not know whether he received the letter of the management bearing No. 205 dt. 1/2-02-93 . He also does not know when he became medically fit to resume his duty. He says that he had obtained Fitness Certificate from Dr. D.K. Kadasne on 20-05-93 . He did not inform the Enquiry Officer that he is fit to resume duty upto the date of his dismissal . He did not file any appeal before the higher authority against the order of his dismissal . From the above statement of the witness. It is evident that he remained continuously absent from 17-6-92 and did not inform the Officers of the management that he had recovered from illness during the enquiry proceedings . He obtained the Fitness Certificate on 20-05-93 after the conclusion of the enquiry by the Enquiry Officer . He was dismissed from service on 24-05-93 . It is thereforc clear that the workman himself avoided to participate in the enquiry .

S.O. 1089. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 133/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Dr. D.K. Kadasnc also did not appear in the Court to stand Cross examination and prove the Medical Certificate of the workman Sheikh Sahid . The Doctor 2914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

26.1: Theft , fraud or dishonesty in connection with the employers business or property.

26.5: Wilful neglect of work .

Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 05-03-2003 .

[No. L - 22012/306/ 98 - IR ( C - II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR

PRESENT :

Shri B. G. Saxena , Presiding Officer

The workman mentioned in the claim that his explanation was not called and he was suspended from 10-05-96. The Enquiry Officer did not conduct the enquiry against him properly. He was not responsible for issuing extra coal . No loss was caused to the management of WCL because the amount of the excess coal lifted by the parties has been recovered by the management . S.N. Mannala , Assistant Loading Supervisor and Shrirang were responsible for issuing excess coal to the parties . He claimed reinstatement and backwages from the date ofhis dismissal i.e. 14-08-97 .

REFERENCE No. CGIT : 133/2000 THE SUB AREA MANAGER, W.C.L. AND

Shri P.S. Ghate

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d ) of Sub -section ( 1 ) and Sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial dispute Act, 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide order No. L - 22012 /206/98 - IR(CM - II ) dt. 29-12-1998 on following schedule .

SCHEDULE

In the Written Statement, the mangement ofWCL contested the case. The workman had submitted the reply of the chargesheet on 11-05-96 . His reply was not satisfactory, hence enquiry was conducted against him. Shri M.N. Ali , Deputy Personal Manager was appointed Enquiry Officer . During enquiry the workman had taken the help of Suresh Deshmukh , his coworker . The copies ofthe documents produced during enquiry Ex- 1 to 27 were given to the workman . The management examined witnesses and they were cross examined at length by the workman and his coworker . The workman was also provided opportunity to lead evidence in defence . The workman examined himself and closed the evidence .

"Whether the action of management namely Sub Area Manager , Dhoptala Sub Area of WCL, Distt . Chandrapur in dismissing w.e.f. 14-08-97 of Sh . P.S. Ghate , Ex -Clerk , Dhoptala is legal , proper and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ? What other directions are necessary in the matter? "

The Enquiry Officer submitted his report dt. 12-7-97 . The workman was also issued show cause notice No. 45-B/930 dt . 2/ 5-08-97 along with the copy of the enquiry report . The workman submitted his reply on 13-8-97 .

This reference was sent to CGIT Court No - II Mumbai in December , 1998 by Ministry of Labour, New Delhi.

This file was received by transfer in CGIT, Nagpur in June, 2000.

Asthe charges were proved against the workman P.S. Ghate , the disciplinary authority decided to impose the punishment of dismissal from service . The order of dismissal was passed against workman P.S.Ghate on 14-08-97 . The workman is not entitled to any relief.

Boththe parties submitted oral and documentary evidence in this court . They have also submitted their written arguments . Both the parties are represented by their advocates .

The workman P.S. Ghate has submitted his Statement of Claim on 01-03-99 . He has mentioned in the Claim that he was working as Clerk in Sub Area, Dhoptala of WCL, Distt. Chandrapur since 1989. On 09-05-96 chargesheet was issued to him. He was working as Weigh Bridge Clerk . It was alleged that in April , 1996, he had issued excess quantity of coal against the following Release Orders:

Ihave considered the entire oral and documentary evidence on record and the arguments submitted by the advocates of the parties.

R/o No.

Quantity of excess coal issued

70623

24.120 MT

69412

75.200 MT

70638

01.170 MT

70620

63.370 MT

70969

26,000 MT

He was charged for committing the following act of misconduct under the Standing Orders of Western Coal MinesLtd.:

The workman Purushottam S/ o Shankar Ghate submitted his affidavit on 06-11-99 . He was cross examinedby the advocate of WCL on 09-10-2000. In cross examination the workman admitted that he had received the chargesheet in which the charges ' were mentioned against him . This chargesheet was receivedby him on 09-05-96. He had submitted his reply to the charges on 11-05-96.This document in Ex - M2 . He also got opportunity to defend himself. Suresh Deshmukh coworker was authorisedby him to defend him . He [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

attended the enquiry proceedings and had examined himself in his defence . He had also received show cause notice and the copy of the enquiry report . He did not submit appeal before the appellate authority . He is educated upto Class -XII ,

From the side of the management the affidavits of M.N. Ali and Ranjit Singh witnesses were filed. The advocate of the workman cross examined M.N. Ali on 18-06-01 . Ranjit Singh was cross examined on 23-10-01 . Both these witnesses were cross examined at length by the advocate of the workman . M.N. Ali , the Enquiry Officer has stated that the workman was given full opportunityto defend himselfduring the enquiry proceedings . The copies ofdocuments on which the management relied upon, were givento the workman . The workman attended the enquiry proceedings with his coworker Suresh Deshmukh . On the enquiry proceedings the signatures of the workman were obtained. The workman did not raise any objection against the conducting of enquiry by him . Ranjit Singh the management representative was not subordinate to him . Ranjit Singh had given his written Statement to him on 22-05-97 . He was cross examined by the workman. The chargesheet was issued to S.N. Mannala and Shrirang also. Shrirang has died. The witness denied the suggestion that the copies ofdocuments were not supplied to the workman. He has stated that the copies of documents were given to the workman during the enquiry. The copies of the Gate passes bearing No. 1935 , 1936 , 1937 , 1962, 1963 were also given to the workman. Considering the evidence he had submitted his enquiry report and found workman P.S. Ghate guilty of the charges . He had issued excess quantity of coal against Release order mentioned below:-

70620 15.330 MT

70623 24.120 MT

70969 16.340 MT

69412 75.200 MT

70638 1.170 MT

Total 132.160 MT

The Enquiry Officer has mentioned in his affidavit submitted in the Court , that the workman P.S. Ghate did not check the balance before issuing Gate Passes due to which excess coal was issued by him to the parties against abovenoted Release Orders .

In the enquiry report dt. 12-07-97 he has mentioned that the workman P.S. Ghate had issued 132.160 MT coal in excess quantity against the Release Orders 70620, 70623, 70969, 69412, 70638. It is also mentioned by him "Had Shri P.S. Ghate checked the balance before issuing Gate Passes , the excess coal could not have been issued . " From the findings of the Enquiry Officer it is clear thatthe workman was negligent in his work and as a Weigh BridgeClerk it was his duty to check the balance of the coal which was to be supplied to the parties on the Gate Passes issued by him.

824 G1 / 03-23

2915

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

The other witness of the management Ranjit Singh was also examined during enquiry proceedings before the Enquiry Officer . He had submitted affidavit in this Court on 05-02-01 . He was cross examined by the counsel for the workman . In his cross examination he has stated that P.S. Ghate was working as Weigh Bridge Clerk inApril , 1996. He had supplied excess quantity of coal against the Release Orders bearing number 70623 , 69412 , 70683 , 70620, 70969. The duty of P.S.Ghate was to check the entries of the truck and to do entry in Account Book (Ledger) properly. It was also his duty to check the balance quantity of coal which was to be supplied to the parties. He could stop issuing Gate Passes in any Release Order, ifhe had any doubt of irregularity regarding the balance of the quantity of coal . The Standing Order contains the description of the duty of Weigh Bridge Clerk . The Weigh Bridge Clerk checks the quantity of coal which is to be supplied and sends the truck for loading . When the truck ofthe coal comes on the gate for going out, it is also his duty to check that the excess quantity of coal is not loaded in the truck . the workman P.S. Ghate did not perform his dutyproperly and supplied excess coal to the parties against the above 5 ( five ) Release Orders . He therefore caused loss to the management . He acted dishonestly and it amounted to misconduct in the performance of his duty. The workman in his claim has also admitted that the excess coal was supplied to the parties and the recovery of the amount of excess coal has been recovered from the parties to whom the coal was supplied.

From the above oral and documentary evidence on record the charges levelled against the workman P.S. Ghate have been proved .

The workman was provided full opportunity by the Enquiry Officer to defend himself. The Enquiry Officer was not anyway prejudiced with the workman . The enquiry was conductedby the Enquiry Officer , M.N. Ali according to the prescribed procedure . Hence the enquiry can not be considered unfair . It was conducted according to the principle of natural justice .

Itis argued by the counsel for the workman that the chargeswere vague . The document Ex -MI clearly shows the Release Orders against which the excess supply of coal was made. The charges were quite clear in the chargesheet dt. 09-05-96. In his replydt. 11-05-96 the workman had denied the charges . In Ex- M2 the workman did not say anywhere that the charges are vague or he is unable to understand the charges against him . In the cross examination in this Court on 09-10-2000 , the workman did not say anywhere that the charges were vague or he was unable to understand the charges against him . Thus the argument of the counsel for the workman that the charges were vague , is absolutely baseless .

The argument of counsel for workman that P. S. Ghate is not responsible for excess supply ofcoal to parties is also baseless . On the alleged time i.e. April , 1996 the 2916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर ( संदर्भ संख्या 153/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-22012/424/93- आई आर( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th March , 2003

workman P. S. Ghate was working as Weigh Bridge Clerk . While releasing the coal on the Gate Passes against the Release Orders , it was his dutyto check that how much quantity of coal is to be supplied to various parties for whom the Release Orders were issued . He did not check the balance of the coal which was to be supplied while preparing Gate Passes. The Enquiry officer has clearly mentioned in his enquiry report that the workman was responsible for issuing 132.160 MT excess quantity of coal .

The argument of the counsel for the workman is therefore baseless .

On the basis of evidence discussed above the issues framed on 07-10-99 are decided as under : -

ISSUE NO . 1 :

S.O. 1090.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 153/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum Labour -Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 05-03-2003 ,

The domestic enquiry was conducted against the workman P. S. Ghate as per the principles of natural justice. The workman was provided full opportunity to defend himself during the departmental enquiry by the Enquiry officer.

ISSUE NO . 2 :

[No. L - 22012/424/93 - IR ( C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR

The Findings of the Enquiry Officer are based on the oral and documentary evidence produced before him. The findings of the Enquiry Officer therefore can not be considered perverse . The enquiry was conducted fairly and properly.

ISSUE NO . 3 :

PRESENT : SHRI B. G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer REFERENCE No. CGIT : 153/2000 THE SUB AREA MANAGER, W.C.L. AND

SHRI DEORAO KUDE

AWARD

The action of management in dismissing P. S. Ghate , Ex -Clerk , Dhoptala is legal , proper and justified. The workman was dismissed from service as the charges levelled against him had been fully proved . The punishment awarded to the workman was also justified.

ISSUE NO . 4 :

The workman is not entitled for reinstatement in service or any other relief claimed by him .

TheCentral Government, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by Clause ( d) ofSub - section ( 1 ) and Sub Section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial dispute Act , 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide order No. L - 22012/424/ 93 - IR(C - II ) dt . 16-03-94 on following schedule.

SCHEDULE

In view of the above findings I hold that the action of the management namely Sub Area Manager , Dhoptala Sub Area of WCL , Distt . Chandrapur in dismissing P.S. Ghate , Ex - Clerk w.e.f. 14-08-97 is legal , proper and justified.

ORDER

"Whether the action of management of the Sub Area Manager , Chanda Rayatwari Colliery of W. C. Ltd. , Distt. Chandrapur , in dismissing the service of Shri Deorao Kude, Ex. Shot Carrier, without enquiry is justified or not ? If not, to what relief the workman isentitled for ? "

The action of the management namely Sub Area Manager , Dhoptala Sub Area of WCL , Distt . Chandrapur indismissing P.S. Ghate , Ex- Clerk w.e.f. 14-08-97 is legal , proper and justified. The workman is not entitled to any releif claimed by him.

This reference was sent to CGIT Court No - I at Mumbai on 16-03-94 by the Ministry of Labour , New Delhi . This file was received by transfer at CGIT , Nagpur in June, 2000 and the parties produced evidence .

The reference is answered accordingly.

Date : 6-2-03

B.G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2003

The Statement of Claim filed by the workman Deorao Kude on 18-07-94 at CGI Tribunal No. I at Mumbai . The workman mentioned in his Statement of Claim that he was working as Ex. Shot Carrier in Sub Area, Chanda Rayatwari Colliery ofDistt. Chandrapur. He had been continuously absenting from 13-07-91 from duty. The chargesheet was issued to him on 09-10-91 .

का. आ. 1090.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

The workman has claimed that from 30-06-91 to 12-7-91he was taking treatment from the colliery dispensary . He was declared fit from 13-07-91 but he was unable to do his duty so his mother took him to her village for consulting private doctor for treatment. The chagesheet was issued to him on 09-10-91 for his absence from duty from 13-07-91 . He submitted his reply on 22- 10-91 . He went to join his duty on 22-10-91 but he was not allowed to join duty. The enquiry was conducted against him and he was terminated from service from 30- 03-92 . He claimed feinstatement with backwages .

The management contested the case and stated in Written Statementdt . 10-01-95 that the workman was working as Ex . Shot Carrier . He had absented himself from 13-07-91 without any intimation to the management . Chargesheet was issued to him on 09-10-91 . The workman submitted his explanation on 22-10-91 which was not found satisfactory . 29-02-92 , 02-03-92 were fixed for enquiry. The workman did not turn up. Shri N. K. Seth was appointed Enquiry Officer and he also fixed enquiry on 22-03-92 and 24-03-92 . Registered Notice was sent to theworkman on his permanent address . In the news paper "Chandrapur Samachar " the notice was published on 17-03-92 in which it was mentioned that if the workman will not turn up to defend himself in the enquiry proceedings on 24-03-92 the enquiry shall proceed exparte. The Enquiry Officer completed enquiry on 24- 03-92 after recording evidence of management . The workman did not attend the enquiry . Enquiry Officer N. K. Seth submitted his enquiry report on 25-03-92 to Superintendent (M)/Manager, Chanda Rayatwari Colliery. The Enquiry Officer found the workman guilty of misconduct under provisions of Standing Order 13B(4) , 13B(34) and ID for being habitually absent from duty without permission from competent authorities. The workman was absent from duty unauthorisedly w.e.f. 13- 07-91 . On the basis of this report of the Enquiry Officer the workman was dismissed from service from 30-03-92 vide order No. WCL/ CHA/ SOM/DRC 3773 dt . 29-03- 92 of Superintendent (M)/Manager , Chanda Rayatwari Colliery . The management mentioned in Written Statement that the workman was absent from duty from 1986 to 1992 , several times . The details of his attendance in duty was as under :-

DAYS

YEAR

1986

2917

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

Both the parties have produced oral and documentary evidence in support of their claim: They have also submitted Written Arguments.

I have considered the entire oral and documentary evidence on record.

The management had suhmitted affidavit of Shri D. S. Rawat, Deputy CME on 12-04-01 . Shri Rawat died and so the manager could not produce him for cross examination . The management submitted affidavit of another witness J. Ravindranath, Superintendent (M)/ Management who was working as Under Manager in the year 1992 at Chanda Rayatwari Colliery. This witness was cross examined on 13-03-02 by the representative of the union of the workman Shri S. R. Pendre .

On 27-12-01 the management represented that N.K. Seth, Enquriy Officer has also died.

Shri S. R. Pendre had submitted his affidavit on 29-10-96 . He represented that he does not want to stand as witness for the workman.

The workman Deorao Kude also submitted his affidavit on 14-11-96. He was cross examined by Shri K. R. Achariya, Personal Manager , WCL on 12-12-2000 .

168 days

1987

107 days

Nil

1988

1989

73 days

Nil

1990

1991

The workman Deorao Kude in his cross examination admitted that he remained absent from duty from 13-07-91 . Prior to this date also he was on sick leave but the doctor had declared him medically fit on 13-07- 91 anddirected him to join duty. He did not join duty on 14-07-91 . He again fell ill on 15-07-91 and did not join duty. He did not inform Sub Area Manager or any other officer ofthe colliery on 15-07-91 or after this date , about hisabsence from duty. Thus the workman has admitted that after 13-07-91 he remained absent from duty and did not inform any officer of the colliery that is unable to attend duty for any reason. He is educated upto Class -X . Hedid not inform his superior officers regarding his illness . He says that his office was at a good distance from his house so he did not send any information to any officer of the colliery explaining any reason for his absence . The witness further admitted that he had received chargesheet and had submitted the reply of the chargesheet. He did not attend the enquiry proceedings. The workman in cross examination did not explain for what reasons he absented himself from enquiry proceedings . He does not know whether any notice regarding the enquiry proceedings was published in any news paper or not . The workman has further admitted that after 13-07-91 he did not go to any dispensary of WCL for taking any treatment .

83 days

1992

Nil (upto the date of his dismissal) .

The Sub Area Manager in his Written Statement mentioned that the workman is not entitled to any relief claimed by him.

Thus from the statement of the workman Deorao Kude it is clear that he was aware of enquiry proceedings but he himself avoided to participate in the enquiry proceedings before Enquiry Officer .

The statement of management witness J.Ravindranath shows that Silvano Rodrix was appointed 2918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 6 मार्च , 2003

Enquiry Officer by D.S. Rawat . After that N. K. Seth was appointed Enquiry Officer . N. K. Seth completed the enquiry and submitted enquiry report.

का. आ. 1091.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी.आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, बैंगलोर ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/550/99- आई . आर. ( सी- II ) ]

एम. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th March, 2003

It is argued by the representative of the workman that management has no right to change the Enquiry Officer. This argument is baseless . The representative of the management has argued that N. K. Seth was not anyway prejudiced withthe workman . The workman did not raise any objection on the appointment of N. K. Seth as Enquiry Officer during the enquiry proceedings . As the workman did not raise any objection on the appointment of N. K. Seth as Enquiry Officer even before the appellate authority after termination of his service , he has no right to take this plea at this stage of proceedings in this Court in the year 2002 i.e. after 10 years of his termination . The argument ofmanagement representative is satisfactory in the above circumstances .

S.O. 1091. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 57/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman, which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 05-03-2000.

[No. L -22012 /550/99 - IR (C- II ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

As I discussed above the workman has himself admitted that after 13-07-91 he did not send any information to the management about the reasons of his absence from duty . He also did not submit any medical report of his illness to the management after 13-7-91. The workman also did not prefer to participate in the enquiry proceedings after receiving chargesheet and submitting his reply to the chargesheet on 22-10-91 . Thus the enquiry proceedings can not be considered unfair .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: 4th February, 2003

Present : Hon'ble Shri V.N. Kulkarni , B. Com . L. L.B. Preisding Officer , C.G.I.T. -cum-Labour Court , Bangalore C.R. NO . 57/2000

The workman was found guilty of misconduct on the basis of enquiry report dt. 25-03-92 submitted by Shri N. K. Seth, Enquiry Officer . In the above circumstances the dismissal of the workman from service by the management is justified . The Written Statement submitted by the management also shows that the workman did not work in the year 1988 , 1990 and 1992 even for a single day and his attendance was nil during all the above 3 years . In 1989 he worked for 73 days and in 1991 he worked for 83 days only. The workman has not disputed these facts mentioned in the Written Statement .

IstParty: Smt Laxmi F. Pujar, D/o Fakirappa Pujar , Srivamula Bhandari , Block No. 3 KMC Class IV Quarters, Hubli - 580021

IIParty:

Considering the entire oral and documentary evidence on record , I therefore hold that the enquiry was conducted fairly and properly . The workman was in the habit of remaining absent . The action of the management of WCL therefore for dismissing him from the service can not be considered unfair or unjustified.

ORDER

TheDistrict Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Sumangla Complex, Hubli .

AWARD

The action of the management of Sub - Area manager , Chanda Rayatwari Colliery of WCL , Distt. Chandrapur in dismissing the service of Shri Deorao Kude w.e.f. 30-03-92 is legal and justified . The workman is not entitled to any relief claimed by him.

The reference is answered accordingly.

Date: 5-2-03

The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred the dispute vide Order No L- 22012/ 550 /99 /IR CM - II dated 1st August, 2000 for adjudication on the following schedule :

B.G. SAXENA , Presiding officer 2919

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Smt . Laxmi F. Pujar is justified ? If not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled? "

that it is true that she was working with them continuously buton account of circular of the Higher Authorities work was refused to her. With this it is clear that for a long period she was working with the management and she has worked continuously. She has worked for more than 13 years.

2. The first Party was working with the management. Her services were terminated and therefore , Industrial Dispute is raised.

3. Parties appeared and filed Claim Statement and Counter respectively.

12. The only contention of the management is that she could not be regularised because of the circular . Admittedly no notice was given and no enquiry was conducted. No compensation was paid to her before she was refused work.

4. The case of workman in brief is as follows:

5. The first party was working as Sweeper. Shejoined the services in the year 1986. She was discharging her duties honestly and diligently. She was working for 8 hours . She was paid initial Rs. 5/- per day and then Rs. 10/- and then Rs. 30/- , Rs . 40/- and lastly Rs . 55/- per day.

13. Workman gave evidence as WWI and she deposed in support of her case . Documents are marked in herevidence. Ex. WI is the statement showing the wages paid to her year - wise . Ex . W2 is the circular of the Higher Authority regarding recruitment of casual daily rated employees.

6. She was doing duties regularly and continuously without any break . She has worked nearly 13 hours continuously. The order of termination is illegal . No enquiry was conducted and no compensation was paid. Workman for these reasons and for some other reasons has prayed to pass award in her favour.

7. As against this case of the management is as follows:

14. According to Ex . W3 workers who were engaged as on 2-5-1986 and fulfilled the conditions prescribed for any entry level Category- III & IV posts and whose particulars were placed before the Board be regularised vide office letter No. EP. 1 (4 ) /85 /Vol. II dated 6th May 1987. It is also mentioned that those who do not fulfill the conditions for regular appointment, their services should be discontinued . Cut off date is given as 2-5-1986. Ex. W4 is the document to show that some of the officials have been regularised .

15. Fact remains that on the cut off date she was working with the management . She has also worked for a period of nearly 13 years with the management .

16. Taking all this into consideration and the admission of MW1 that she has worked continuously with the management, management has to regularize her services. Considering all this I proceed to pass the following order:

ORDER

8. Food Corporation of India is established under Food Corporation of India Act of 1964. In Para 3 , it is stated that the first party was working on daily wages and she was engaged to attend the miscellaneous work like sweeping, watering and cleaning purposes at the District Office, FCI, Hubli and she was paid daily wages . She was paid once in a week or once in a fortnight . Government of India who control the appointments and regularization of services and therefore , the Corporation had no occasion to consider the regularization of service of first party. Therefore, the first party continued to work as daily wages worker. She could not be regularised.

The Reference is partly allowed and the management is directed to regularize her services if she fulfills all the conditions. No other benefits are awarded.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 4th February 2003).

V.N. KULKARNI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च , 2003

9. It is the further case of the management that the first party has never worked continuously for more than 3 months including holidays and therefore, she was not regularised. She is not entitled for any benefits. In view of the directions issued by the Head Office, the first party was asked not to attend her work w.e.f. 26-3-1999 . Management for these reasons and for some other reasons has prayed to reject the reference.

10. Management examined Mr. Srinivasan as MW1. According to his evidence workman was engaged on daily wages for sweeping and cleaningetc. and they were paying her weekly. She was not a regular employee and she was engaged whenever there was work. She was not worked continuously.

का. आ. 1092.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय , डब्ल्यू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर (संदर्भ संख्या 258/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/56/2000-आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी 11. MW 1 in his cross examination says that the workman started working since 1986. The working hours are also given by him. MW1 admits in his cross examination 2920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 6th March, 2003

12-02-97 the Ministry of Labour refused to refer his case for adjudication to CGIT. Later on vide order No. L - 22012 / 56/ 2000/ IR ( CM - II )dt . 29-08-2000 this reference was sent by Ministry of Labour to CGIT, Nagpur for adjudication . The workman claimed his reinstatement as Surface Worker .

S.O. 1092. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.258 /2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 05-03-2003 .

[No. L - 22012/56/2000-IR(C- II) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BIDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , NAGPUR

Present : Shri B. G. Saxena, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT : 258/2000

The management of WCL submitted Written Statement on 22-02-01 " and mentioned therein that Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide order No. L- 22012/357 /26 - IR ( C - II ) dated 12-02-97 had refused to refer this dispute for adjudication due to lapse of about 18 years in raising the dispute . The management also mentioned that the workman was appointed for casual nature of work under minimum wages Act . The workman Venugopal D. Dukka had not worked for 240 days . He was not appointed on any regular post . The workman himself left the employment and his where abouts were not known to the management. He raised the dispute after 18 years . He is not entitled to any retrenchment compensation . He is also not entitled for reinstatement .

THE SUB AREA MANAGER, W.C.L. AND SHRI VENUGOPAL DURGAIYYA DUKKA AWARD

Both the parties submitted oral and documentary evidence . They have also submitted their Written Arguments through their advocates .

I have considered the entire oral and documentary evidence on record .

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by Clause ( d) of Sub Section ( 1 ) and Sub Section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide order No. L - 22012 /56/ 2000/ IR( CM - II ) dated 29-08-2000 on following schedule.

SCHEDULE

" Whether the action of the management namely Sub Area Manager, Dhoptala Sub Area of WCL, PO : Sasti , Tah. , Rajura, Distt . Chandrapur in not reinstating Sh. Venugopal Durgaiyya Dukka , Ex - Surface Worker, Sasti Colliery of WCL is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date? What other directions are necessary in the matter?"

Venugopal D. Dukka, workman submitted his affida- vit on 26-04-2001 . He was cross examined on 29-08-2001 by the advocate of WCL . The workman stated in cross examination that he was appointed as Surface Worker in 1976. He does not know whether his appointment was temporary . He does not know whether he was told that he will be made permanant or not. He says that he was forcibly removed from service byAssistant Manager. He does not know after how many years he raised the dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner. He says that he had moved an application in 1994 to the management for his removal from his service . He denied the suggestion that he had himself abandoned the service.

The workman Venugopal Durgaiyya Dukka has submitted Statement of Claim on 09-11-2000 in this Court . He has mentioned that he was appointed on 13-04-1976 as Surface Worker in Sasti Colliery, Ballarpur of WCL. His service was terminated on 24-04-78 all of a sudden . Some other persons were also terminated with him and they have been reinstated through the help of union leader of INTUC . He received information about their re -employment and wrote a letter on 30-12-93 to the management of WCL for his reinstatement . He again wrote letter on 15-03-94, 29-03-94, 31-03-94 but the management did not consider his case as there was delay or lapse of 18 years period . He raised the dispute in January 1995 before Assistant Labour Commissioner , Chandrapur. The ALC submitted failure of conciliation report to the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi but on

From the side of management the statement of I.M. Chandok , Personal Manager was recorded . He stated in cross examination that no record is available with the management to show that how many days the workman Venugopal Dukka worked in 1976. Neither the workman nor the management have submitted any document in this Court to show that Venugopal Dukka had worked for more than 240 days in any calendar year . The application of workman for re - employment was not considered because he had moved application after the gap of 18 years. No document has been filed by the workman or by the management to show that on which date the workman was appointed. He does not know whether other persons who were terminated in 1978 2921

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

औद्योगिक अधिकरण I धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को06-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/548/97- आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 7th March , 2003 have been re - employed or not . The workman has submitted the photostat copy of applicationdt . 30-12-93 that he along with other workman were stopped from working by the management of Sasti Colliery in the year 1978. He had left his place of living long ago and had left the station place as he had gone out for bread earning . So he did not move any application from 1978 to 1993. The above document therefore shows that the workınan did not move any application for providing work to him by WCL management for about 15 years i.e. upto December, 1993. His subsequent application also do not reveal as to why he did not raise the dispute for re- employment upto 15 years .

S.O. 1093. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.41 / 98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-03-2003 .

[No. L-20012/548/97 -IR( C-I) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

There is no record on the file of this Court to show that the workman Venugopal Dukka had worked for more than 240 days in any calendar year from 1976 to 1978. There is also no document to show that he was a regular employee of WCL . No document regarding the date of appointment or date of termination has been filed by the workman or by the management .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL NO.1 , DHANBAD.

In view of the above facts there is no document to show that the workman was retrenched from the service by the management ofWCL .

In the matter of a reference under Sec . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 41 of 1998 .

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Bhagabandh Colliery of BCCL .

AND

The management has taken a plea that the workman himself abandoned the service. In the above circumstances the workman has also not mentioned any reason as to why he kept silence for 18 years and did not raise the dispute before ALC, Chandrapur.

Their Workmen.

The raising of dispute after 18 years had no justifica-

tion.

Present: Shri S.H. Kazmi , PresidingOfficer.

Appearances:

In the above circumstances and evidence on record the workman is not entitled to any relief claimed by him .

ORDER

For the Employers : Shri B.M. Prasad, Advocate . For the Workman Shri S. Bose , Treasurer, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry: Coal.

Dated, the 25th Februray, 2003 .

AWARD

The action of the management namely Sub Area Manager, Dhoptala sub Area of WCL , PO : Sasti . Tah . Rajura , Distt . Chandrapur in not reinstating Venugopal Durgaiyya Dukka Ex - Surface Worker , Sasti Colliery of WCL is legal and justified . The workman is not entitled to any relief claimed by him. There is no explanation from the workman for the 16 years delay in raising the dispute . The workman is not entitled to any retrenchment compensation or reinstatement in service .

The rcference is disposed of accordingly.

Dated 4-2-2003

By Order No.L-20012/ 548/97 - IR ( C - I) dated the 13th August, 1998 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - sec. ( 1 ) and Sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

B.G. SAXENA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

"Whether the action of the management of Bhagabandh Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in dismissing Smt . Chhepia Kanin, Wagon Loader from the services of the company w.e.f. 13-10-93 on the ground of unauthorised absence from duty since May, 1992 is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

का. आ. 1093.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भ० को० को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार 2922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

circumstances the management had to issue a chargesheet dated 26-5-93 to her after awaiting for such a long period. Later she submitted a reply to the said chargestheet and having found the same to be not satisfactory a domestic enquiry was ordered to be held and during the said domestic enquiry the concerned workmar fully participated alongwith her co - worker and availed full opportunity to defend her case. It is said that after holding such enquiry and recording the evidence etc. the Enquiry Officer submitted his report with his finding and then upon the basis of the said report she was dismissed from serviceby letter dated 13-10-93 . She was dismissed from service by the competent authority by a letter dated 13-10-93 . It is said that the concerned workman was habitual absentee and was not at all sincere about the work of the company as her actual attendance during the last three years before her dismissal from service of the company was very poor. In the year 1990 she worked for 55 days only, in 1991 for 29 days only and in 1992 for 15 daysonly. Further it has been said that considering the facts that absenteeism has become a serious problem in the colliery and it is adversely effecting the performance of the colliery, the action of the management was fully justified. It has also been said that in the event of the employees falling sick the management has an elaborated setup for providing free medical aid to the workmen as well as their family members and for that purpose competent Medical Officers and other staff with a good stock of medicine are always available. This apart, the management has Regional and Central Hospital also for the said purpose and as such there is absolutely no reason for a workman to go to a private Doctor or a private hospital for getting treatment .

In its rejoinder also the management has denied or controverted several statements made in the written statement of the workman and reiterated its stand already taken in its written statement. It was specifically denied that the concerned workman reported for duty on 7-9-93 or any intimation was given by her regarding her illness or any letter was sent by her for review of the order of dismissal.

Likewise in the workman's rejoinder to the management's written statement also several statements made in the written statement were denied or controverted and by challenging the action of the management once again it was asserted that the workman had informed the management about her illness which resulted in her absence from duty.

2. The case of the sponsoring union, in short, is that the concerned workman, Smt . Chhepia Kamin, was a permanent employee of Bhagaband Colliery of M/s . BCCL and she was working as Wagon Loader . Since she was not provided accommodation in the colliery quarter, she was staying with her family in the village home at a distance from the colliery. It has been said that w.e.f. 11-5-92 the concerned workman became seriously indisposed at her village and remained under medical treatment till 6-9-93 . It is also said that the information in that regard was also sent to the management through co- worker working in the same colliery. Further, it has been said that uponbeing declared fit by the Physician she reported for duty at the colliery on 7-9-93 but she was not allowed todo the same, rather was handed over a chargesheet dated 26-5-1993to which she submitted her explanation. Thereafter, it is said that the management by a letter dated 13-10-1993 dismissed the concerned workman from service without further intimation in regard to the submission of explanation by the workman. It is said that the workman herself as well as the union both represented before the management for reviewing the order of dismissal and for allowing her to resume duty but no any response was made from the side of the management and ultimately by a petition dated 20-1-1994, the union raised the dispute before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad. The conciliation proceeding , however , ended in failure due to adamant attitude of the management's representative and then ultimately the dispute was referred to this Tribunal for adjudication . Further , the case is that the concerned workman was absent from duty due to serious illness and having been not provided with accommodation at the colliery she was staying with her family in the village home at a distance from the colliery for which the concerned workman did inform the management through her co -worker. It has also been said that the management did not issue any notice to the concerned workman for her absence from duty till she reported for duty on 7-9-93 at the colliery. The charge- sheet dated 26-5-93 was supplied to her on 9-7-93 and in a hot haste management issued letter of dismissal on 13- 10-93. Lastly it is said that the action of the management in dismissing a female worker in a most arbitrary and illegal manner exhibits the intention of the management to do away with the services of the female workers in the colliery. The relief, as such , has been sought for reinstatement of the concerned workman with full back wages w.e.f. 7-9-93 treating the earlier period as leave without pay and to treat the entire length as continuity of service for all purposes .

4. It is significant to point out at the very outset that during the pendency of this reference the issue relating to fairness of the domestic enquiry was taken up as preliminary issue and the management apart from producing original documents relating to the enquiry proceeding also examined one witness on the said aspect but when the case was fixed for evidence on behalf of 3. The management's case , on the other hand, as disclosed in the written statement, in short , is that the concerned workman absented from duty since May, 1992 without permission and without satisfactory cause for over a year and so . She also failed to send the intimation to the management in that regard and so under such 2923

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

the workman the workman's representative conceded the fairness of the domestic enquiry and so in that view the domestic enquiry was held to be fair and proper and the case was fixed for argument on merit . In view of these developments , as such, the only question which is now left to be considered is whether on the basis of the materials on record the finding arrived at with respect to the guilt of the concerned workman and the subsequent action of the management in dismissing the concerned workman from her service can be taken to be just , proper and sustainable or not .

anything about the nature of her illness and the total period during which she remained confined to bed due to illness. In reply to the chargesheet no statement was made regarding any information sent in that regard to the management . During enquiry, however, for the first time she stated that she had sent information by post but during her cross- examination upon being asked categorically she stated that the information was not sent in writing . In that regard further she stated that she had sent the information through her sister , Rathi Kamin, who works in the same colliery. An obvious contradiction, as such, is there on the aforesaid aspect. Furthermore , the said sister whose name was taken was not examined during the enquiry in support of the aforesaid statement . During the cross-examination of second witness of the management he was asked whether he had received any registered letter dated 10-7-93 or not containing the information regarding the illness of the concerned workman to which he replied 'No ' . In this context when the question was put to the concerned workman during her cross -examination as to how and why her explanation to the chargesheet was submitted on 10-7-93 and on the same day the information regarding illness was also sent , she failed to give any satisfactory reply. Though the management's witness denied the receipt of any such letter but even if it is accepted for the moment that such information was sent by post then also there is no explanation at all why it was sent so belatedly when she was absenting from May, 1992 itself and for which the chargesheet had already been issued against her on 26-5-93 .

5. As it is evident from the enquiry proceeding papers (Ext.M - 1 ) and enquiry report ( Ext.M -2 ), when the concerned workman was found to be absenting from her duty for a long time i.e. w.e.f. 11-5-92 without any leave , permission or even information, a chargesheet dated 26-5-93 was issued against her under clause 26.1.1 of Certified Standing Orders of the Company to which she replied and took the ground of her illness. The explanation as furnished , however , was not found satisfactory by the management and it ordered an enquiry in the matter . Accordingly, the enquiry was held and the workman alongwith her co- worker appeared and participated in the said enquiry. Two witnesses were examined on behalf of the management and likewise three witnesses were produced from the side of the workman . Few documents were also marked exhibits . Thereafter, upon the completion of enquiry the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the workman guilty of the misconduct as alleged and then on the basis of the said report the concerned workman was ordered to be dismissed from her service and the same was communicated to her vide letter dated 13-10-93 (Ext.M-5 ) .

Out of the two witnesses examined during the enquiry on behalf of the management , one was a Bill Clerk and another was a Leave Clerk . First one clearly stated that the workman remained absent from 11-5-92 and no salary was paid to her since then . The workman's side declined to cross - examine him . Likewise , the second witness also stated that after May, 1992 the concerned workman had not taken any leave and has also not sent any information to the office in that regard. Upon question being asked during cross -examination he denied to have received any registered letter dated 10-7-93 by which information was sent regarding the illness of the concerned workman .

Upon the closure of the evidence of the management when the concerned workman was called upon to make statement she stated that she has nothing more to say than what has already been stated in her reply or explanation to the chargesheet . She thereafter stated that she had already sent the information to the management by post regarding her illness .

Neither in her explanation nor in her statement during the enquiry the concerned workman stated

Besides the above during her cross -examination the concerned workman produced one medical certificate granted by a medical practitioner wherein it was mentioned that the workman was under treatment from 11-5-92 to 6-9-93 . It is mentioned in the deposition that she wanted to file the said document also after getting the same photo copied from the original but it does not appear from anywhere whether the same was filed at all or not. Anyway, by the said certificate effort was made to explain the entire period of absence but it is significant to note that in this regard in her explanation furnished the statement was made that due to lack of money she could not get herself treated by a medical practitioner and got treated by " Jaributi " . In her statement during cross-examination , however, she stated that initially she got treatment under a Doctor but due to shortage of money later she was treated by " Jaributi " . One witness ofthe workman, namely, Manik Bouri , during his cross- examination has also stated the same. But if these statements are believed then why the certificate of the doctor covers the whole period i.e. 11-5-92 to 6-9-93 . There is no explanation whatsoever. No medical prescription etc. was produced . There is no explanation why the concerned workman did not choose to get treatment at the colliery dispensary itself or at the Central 824G1/03-24 2924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Hospital where easily she could have been treated free of cosi , specially when as per her own statement she had no money for being treated medically or by a medical practitioner.

management neither any witness produced on behlalf of the management stated anything about that nor any document was filed in support of the aforesaid statement or to show the total attendance of the concerned workman in those three years prior to her dismissal from service . The union in its rejoinder to the management's written statement has specifically denied the statement made in the aforesaid regard by the management. Therefore , as nothing has been put forward in support of the aforesaid stand being taken it is not possible to come to a conclusion that the concerned workman , in fact , was habitual absentee . It has not been urged on behalf of the management that if at all the workman's conduct was as such a then earlier chargesheet was issued against her or she was dealt with departmentally.

As far as the workman's witnesses are concerned , DW- 1 , and DW-2 have not stated anything about the nature of illness or about the fact as to for how long the concerned workman remained ill . DW-3 has said that there was a fracture in the right hand of the concerned workman since about last one year. Firstly there is no such statement even by the concerned workman and secondly, even if it is accepted then it becomes clear that she was not bed ridden as she was simply having a fracture in her hand and so in such circumstances she could have herself appeared physically before the management's authority for making any request for grant of leave or for any other purpose whatsoever. There is no explanation forth coming in this regard. Further, it is difficult to conceive that a person would be physically in capable or handicapped due to fracture for such a long time or for more than one year and would go on getting the treatment for the same . Unless the case is very much complicated hardly not more than 2 or 3 months are taken in recovering fully from bone fracture .

In my view, even if the concerned lady failed to put forward satisfactory explanation and as such was rightly held guilty for her unauthorised absence she certainly did not deserve the ultimate punishment of dismissal . Instead of inflicting such harsh punishment taking lenient view in the matter as also considering the fact that she was an illiterate and rustic lady it would have been just and proper to award any other appropriate punishment . Consequently, in the ends of justice the punishment as awarded needs modifications Thus , in my view, considering the totality of facts and circumstances the interest ofjustice would be served if the punishment is modified to the extent of denial of back wages to the concerned workman in the event of her reinstatement in the services of the management . The concerned workman, as such, deserves to be reinstated , but she would not have any claim for her back wages.

Inshort, it is difficult to observe that the concerned workman remained absent during the relevant period due to sufficient cause and with information to the management . As such , considering the facts and circumstances borne out of the materials on record rightly she was held guilty of the said misconduct by the Enquiry Officer and the findings arrived at in that regard need no interference at all .

7. The award is , thus , rendered as hereunder :

6. It has been contended on behalf of the workman that the extreme punishment of dismissal of the concerned workman from her service , as awarded, is quite disproportionate to the gravity of the charge as levelled against the concerned workman and while inflicting such punishment the concerned authority ought to have considered this aspect also that besides being a female and illiterate the concerned lady also belonged to a backward and suppressed class.

The action of the management of Bhagabandh Colliery ofM/s. B.C.C. Ltd. in dismissing the concerned lady, Chhopia Kamin , Wagon Loader, from the service of the company w.e.f. 13-10-1993 on the ground of her unathorised absence from duty since May, 1992 is not justified and the concerned workman , as such , deserves to be reinstated but without back wages . Consequently, the management is hereby directed to reinstate the concerned workman without back wages within thirty days from the date of publication of this award.

In the circumstances of the case , however, there would be no order as to cost .

S. H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

So far the aforesaid submission being made on the quantum of punishment as awarded is concerned , I find sufficient force in that . The argument from the side of the management on the aforesaid regard is that the punishment cannot be taken to be disproportionate as the concerned lady was , in fact, a habitual absentee and for the last three years prior to her dismissal she had put in the attendance of only few days in each year and her attendance as such earlier also had been found very much unsatisfactory.

का. आ. 1094.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 'का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण I , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/129/2002- आई . आर. ( सी-1 ) ] Though very emphatically the aforesaid submission has been made and there is statement also in that regard in the written statement of the management but during the enquiry there is no mention at all about past conduct of the concerned workman . From the side of the

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th March, 2003

S.O. 1094. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 91/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - 1 Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-03-2003 .

[No. L- 20012/ 129/2002- IR(C-I) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I, DHANBAD In the matter ofa reference under sec . 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act; 1947.

Reference No. 91 of 2002

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of North Tisra Colliery of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. AND Their Workmen .

PRESENT : Shri S.H. Kazmi , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

: Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate .

Forthe Employers

For the Workman

:Shri S.C. Gour, Advocate . :

State : Jharkhand .

:Industry: Coal .

Dated, the 26th February, 2003

AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012/ 129 /2002 - I.R. (C- 1 ) dated 26-7-2002 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of Sub-section ( 1 ) and Sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Kya Koyala Ispat Mazdoor Panchayat Ki B.C.C.L. North Tisra Colliery Ke Prabandhan Se Maang Ki Karmakaar Sri Mahendra Saw Ke Dinnank 6-10-98 Se November, 2001 Ki Awadhi Ke Liye , Under Ground Bhatta Diya Jaye, Uchit Avm Nyava Sangat Hai ? Yadi Haan To Karmakar Kis Raahat Ke Patra Hain ?" 2. By filing one petition today (26-2-2003 ) Sri Gour submits that the parties have settled the dispute outside the Court amicably and now there is no dispute in existence . He submits that in view of such circumstances this reference be finally disposed of. Mr Verma appearing on behalf of the management has got no objection and accepts the aforesaid developinent, which is stated to have taken place inthe meantime.

Considering the aforesaid submissions being made this reference stands finally disposed of.

S. H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer

2925

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1095. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण I धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-20012/609/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 7thMarch, 2003

S.O. 1095. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 76/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-03-2003 .

[No. L-20012/609/2000- IR(C-I) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . L, DHANBAD In the matter of a reference under sec. 10 ( 1 ) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 76 of 2001

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Swang Colliery of M/s . C.C. Ltd. AND Their Workmen .

Present : Shri S. H. Kazmi ,

Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Employers

Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate .

Forthe Workmen

Shri S. C. Gour, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand .

Industry:Coal .

Dated, the 24th February, 2003 AWARD

By order No. L -20012/ 609 /2000/IR ( C - I ) dated the 16thMarch, 2001 the Central Government in the Ministry / of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause(d) of sub - sec . ( 1 ) and sub- sec . ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal : ?

"Whether the action of the management of Swang Colliery of M/ s . C. C. Ltd. in terminating the 2926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] service of Shri Mohan Munda, Ex - PRW on the ground of unauthorised absence is justified ? If not , to what releif is the workman concerned entitled ?"

cause notice and also supplied the copy of the enquiry proceeding etc. to the workman concerned and thereafter the service of the concerned workman was terminated vide letter dated 5/6-8-96 . It has been said that such action of the management was legal and justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief whatsover .

In its rejoinder also while controverting or denying several statements made in the written statement of the workman the management reiterated its stand taken in its written statement and further specifically denied the fact regarding any information by the concerned workman about his illness or for reporting for duty at any point of time during the period of his absence.

Likewise in the rejoinder filed on behalf of the workman also several statements made in the written statement of the management were denied or controverted and itwas asserted once again that the concerned workm..n remained absent under compelling circumstances .

4. It is significant to indicate at the very outset that during the pendency of this reference the issue relating to faimess of domestic enquiry was taken up as preliminary issue but when the case was pending for evidence of the management on that aspect the union or the workman's representative conceded the fairness of the domestic enquiry and prayed for fixing the case for arguments on merit . The domestic enquiry, as such, was declared fair and proper and the case was fixed for arguments on merit. In view of such developments , therefore, the only question now left to be considered is whether the dismissal of the concerned workman from his service on the basis of the materials collected in course of the domestic enquiry or on the basis ofenquiry report can be held to be justified or not .

2. Precisely, the case of the sponsoring union is that the concerned workman , Mohan Munda , was a sincere , honest and hard working workman working in Swang Colliery of M/ s . C.C. Ltd. as piece- rated worker (coal cutter). It has been said that the concerned workman after returning from duty on 10-12-1994 developed very high fever which later on resulted in loss of senses etc. and subsequently due to mental imbalances he was shifted by his family members and co- workers to Kanke Mental Hospital for treatment under psychiatrist where treatment continued from 11-12-1994 to 6-6-1995 . Further, it has been said that after getting fully cured the concerned workman reported for his duty to the management of Swang Collierytogether with medical certificate on 22-6-96 which included the period ofbed rest as advised by the psychiatrist . It is said that the concerned workman was under treatment for a total period of5 months and 25 days , only which was beyond his control and absence was due to compelling circumstances . Further, the case is that a charge- sheet was issued by the management on the alleged ground of unauthorised absence but the same was neither sent to him nor delivered and consequent to that a perfunctory domestic enquiry was held in which neither chance was given to the concerned workman to have assistance of a co - worker nor full opportunity was given to give proper evidence and further during enquiry the evidence was recorded in English and recorded matter was not explained to the concerned workman in Hindi . It has also been said that the workman wasdismissed from his service w.e.f. 6-8-96 wrongly and illegally. Lastly, the relief has been sought for reinstatement ofthe concerned workman with full back wages.

3. The management's stand, on the other hand, as disclosed in its written statement is that the concerned workman started absenting from 12-6-95 without prior information and sanction of leave and since such act on his part was a misconduct as per certified standing order of the company a charge - sheet dated 11-10-95 was issued against him. The workman concerned submitted his reply but the same was found not satisfactory and thereafter domestic enquiry was ordered in the matter. It has been said that the Enquiry Officer accordingly conducted the domestic enquiry in accordance with the principles of naturaljustice and the concerned workman was given full opportunity to defend his case . He participated in the domestic enquiry and put forward the materials also in order to justify his stand . It has also been said that after conducting the enquiry fairly and properly the Enquiry Officer submitted his report wherein he found the concerned workman guilty of the said misconduct . Subsequent to that the management issued second show-

5. From the papers of enquiry proceeding (Ext . M-3 ) as also from the enquiry report (Ext . M-4) it is evident that when the concerned workman was found to be absent from his duty from 12-6-95 a chargesheet dated 11-10-95 was issued against him under the relevant certified standing orders of the company for his unauthorised absence from duty with effect from the aforesaid date. The workman replied to the said chargesheet where in he took the ground of his illness but the same was not found satisfactory by the management and so it ordered an enquiry in the matter which was accordingly conducted by the Enquiry Officer who was appointed for that purpose . It is also evident that on the first day ofthe enquiry it self the concerned workman was also present and the charge levelled against him was read over and explained to him and he was asked by the Enquiry Officer whether he accepts the said charge or not . At that the concerned workman accepted the charge . Subsequent to that he gave his statement also as defence witness . He stated during his evidence that as a matter of fact he was down with mental disturbance as such he could not attend his duty fron 12-6-95 . Further, he said that when 2927

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

was declared fit for duty and reported for his duty on 26-6-95 alongwith medical certificate of a Doctor he was not allowed to join his duty. He made the request for allowing him to join duty in order to save his family from starvation. At that stage , subsequent to the statement of the concerned workman he was asked whether he wanted to produce his co -worker or not to defend his case to which he replied that he has no any co -worker who can defend him and requested to proceed further. The management's representative thereafter cross -examined the workman . He was asked whether he had informed the management of Swang colliery about his unauthorised absence from duty or not to which he replied in affirmative but then said that he has got no paper in support of the said fact . The management's representative was thereafter asked to produce the evidence or regards if any, upon which he produced the Bonus Register of the years 1994 and 1995 in which the attendance of the concerned workman in the ycar 1994 was shown as 169 days and for the year 1995 the same was shown to be ' nil' . No further evidence was adduced on behalf of the management and then the workman was asked to produce his evidence, if any . The workman upon that produced three items of documents namely sick certificate joining report of June , 1995 and application to Dy. Personnel Manager for joining the duty. As none of the sides wanted to adduce further evidence the enquiry was concluded and subsequently the enquiry report was submitted against the concerned workman and it was clearly indicated therein that the concerned workman participated and accepted the charge framed against him on the ground of unauthorised absence from duty. The workman's previous attendance in the year 1995 was also noticed . Subsequent to the submission of the report by way ofOffice Order dated 5/6-8-96 (Ext . M-6 ) the service of the concrned workman was terminated w.e.f. 6-8-96 .

So far the ground taken regarding his illness is concerned , as mentioned above , during the enquiry the statement of the concerned workman was that he could not attend his duty from 12-6-95 due to his mental disturbances and when he was declared fit for duty he reported for duty on 26-6-95 but he was not allowed to join.

as per the written statement the concerned workman reported for duty on 22-6-96 but as per the own statement ofthe concerned workman during enquiry he reported for duty on 26-6-95 . There is an obvious contradiction , as such, upon the aforesaid aspect which cannot be ignored. From the medical certificate which was produced during the enquiry and which has been marked on behalf of the concerned workman in the instant case also as Ex. W - 1 it appears that the concerned doctor has certified that the concerned workman was suffering from mental illness and wasunder his treatment from 11-12-94 to 6-6-95 . He further mentioned therein that he finally examined him on 6-6-95 and now he is quite fit to resume his duty. It is thus apparent from the medical certificate also that the concerned workman was under treatment from 11-12-94 to 6-6-95 and therafter hewas found fit to resume his duty and there is no mention that after 12-6-95 also the concerned workinan became ill due to mental illness or any other illness . There is no material at all produced either during the enquiry or during the pendency ofthe instant case to show that after 12-6-95 the concernedworkman had fallen ill and was being treated for the same. There is also no any authentic document produced to show that during the period of his absence the concerned workman ever informed the management and after recovering from illness be ever reported for joining. Interestingly though the chargesheet speaks about the absence of the concerned workman from 12-6-95 but as perthe own case of the workman he remained absent from 11-12-94 itself due to his illness and recovered only after 6-6-95, and this stand of the workman is supported by the medical certificate also produced by him . Anyway, as we are concerned about the absence of the concerned workmanonly from 12-6-95 as mentioned in the chargesheet the requirment is just to see whether the absence of the concerned workman from 12-6-95 upto the issuance of chargesheet on 11-10-95 can be taken to be unauthorised or not and whether at all there is any explanation furnished from the side of the workman supported by materials in order to show that he was absenting during the said period under compelling circumstance or could not attend duty dueto sufficient and acceptable cause . In this context it is reiterated that nothing has been put forward on behalf of the workman to show that he was down with illness after 12-6-95 . If at all he was ill then as per his own document (Ext. W- 1 ) he was ill and was getting treatment from 11-10-94 to 6-6-95 . In such circumstances the concerned workman seems to have rightly accepted his guilt or the charge levelled against him at the very inception of the enquiry proceeding when the charge as levelled was explained to him by the Enquiry Officer.

Thus , in view of all the aforesaid there does not seem to be any difficulty in arriving to the finding that the concerned workman was rightly held to be guilty for the said charge of misconduct and as such the finding in that regård is not required to be interfered with.

Evidently he has not stated about any development inrespect ofhim prior to 12-6-95 . But in the written statement filed in the instant case on behalf of the workman in. paragraph 4 to 6 the statements have been made that the concerned workman fell ill on 10-12-94 and due to his mental imbalance later he was shifted to Kanke Mental Hospital for treatment where treatment continued from 11-12-94 to 6-6-95 and thereafter upon getting fully cured he reported for his duty alongwith medical certificate on 22-6-96 which included the period of bed rest also as advised by the doctor. As such , there is no statement in the written statement regarding illness of the concerned workman after 12-6-95 , rather the specific statement is there in regard to continuance of treatment from 11-12-94 to 6-6-95 . Further 2928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

6. As far as awarding punishment ofdismissal the concerned workman is concerned it has been strenuously urged on his behalf that the same is not only too harsh , rather is also quite disproportionate to the gravity of charge aslevelled against him . It has been contended that even if the allegation levelled against the concerned workman by the management is taken on its face value the so - called unauthorised absence of the concerned workman was only for a period of4 months or a little above and so taking into account such short period of absence inflicting punishment or disrhissal is too much and too severe .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 7th March, 2003

S.O. 1096.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 113/99) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-03-2003 .

[No. L-20012/476/98 - IR(C- 1 ) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I, DHANBAD.

Inthe matter of a reference under sec. 10( 1 )( d ) ( 2A) of theIndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 . Reference No. 113 of 1999

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of PutkeeBalihari Project of M/s.B.C.C .Ltd. And

Their Workmen

PRESENT : Shri S. H. Kazmi,

PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES :

FortheEmployers

Shri B.M. Prasad, Advocate

For the Workman

None

State : Jharkhand

I find sufficient force in the aforesaid submission being made . It is true that there was unauthorised absence on the part ofthe concerned workman for the said period which he farcly admitted also during the enquiry, but as the absence was only for 4 or 5 months and further since it had not come from the side ofthe management that earlier also for the same nature of misconduct the concerned workman was dealt with departmentally or any action whatsoever was taken against him, the awarding punishment of dismissal from service was certainlytoo harsh and quite disproportionate . In the ends of justice I am of the firm view that so far as the punishment awarded to the concerned workman is concerned the same noeds modification and only that much punishment is required tobe inflicted which can be taken to bejust and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Taking into account the totality of circumstances borne out ofthe materials on record, thus , I am of the view that the interest ofjustice would be served if punishment is modified to the extent of denial of back wages to the concerned workman upon his reinstatement in the service of the management subject to being found medically fit.

7. The award is , thus , made as hereunder :

The action of the management of Swang Collicry of M/s. C.C. Ltd. in terminating the service of the concerned workman, Mohan Munda , on the ground of unauthorised absence is not justified and the concerned workman, as such, deserves reinstatement, but without back wages . Consequently the management is hereby directed to reinstate the concerned workman without back wages within thirty days from the date ofpublication ofthis award.

In the circumstances of the case , however, there would be no order as to cost . S. H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1096 . औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण -1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 113/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-20012/476/98- आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ] एन. पी . केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

Industry: Coal Dated, the 24th February, 2003 AWARD

By order No. L - 20012 /476/ 98 - IR ( C - I ) dated the 4th June, 1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause( d) of Sub- sec. ( 1) and sub - sec . (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the demand of the union from the management of M/ s . BCCL for regularisation of Sri Balaram Modak as Stowing Fitter in Cat. IV w.e.f. 28-4-89 and Fixation of Basic wages @ Rs. 43.50 and next increment Rs . 1.32 per year and accordingly claiming difference of wages from 28-4-89 to 3-12-90 against the regularisation of Sri Balram Modak as Stowing Fitter in Cat . IV and fixation ofBasic Wages Rs . 43.50 w.e.f. 4-12-90 and next date of increment w.e.f. December, 1991 isjustified? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

2. It appears from the record that this case is pending since long for filing of the rejoinder and documents on behalf of the workman. Adjournment after adjournment has been granted for the said purpose , but neither anyone appeared at any point of time nor the steps as required have been taken so far after 19-8-2002 . It is thus obvious 2929

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 188/ 98 IR (CM- I) , dated the 27th Janurary, 1999 .

SCHEDULE

that the workman or the sponsoring union is least interested in pursuing this case any further. As such, it would be needless to keep this case pending any longer .

Thus , this reference case is accordingly disposed of.

S. H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

"Whether the action of the management of P.B. Project of M/ s . B. C. C. L. in dismissing Sh . Fatik Chandra Roy , Clerk vide dismissal Order No. PBP/Per/Dismissal/94/ 71 /545-51 dt . 10-2-1994 under clause 28 of the certified standing order of the company w.e.f. 10-2-94 from the service of the company is justified ? If not, to what relief is the said workman entitled?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to the W.S. submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf isas follows:-

का. आ. 1097.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 66/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/188/98- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 7th March , 2003

S.O. 1097.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/99 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - 11 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-03-2003 .

[No. L- 20012/188 /98 - IR (C -I) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . II , AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI B. BISWAS ,

Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under sec . 10 ( 1 ) (d ) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 . Reference No. 66 of 1999

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Dy. CME/Agent of M/ s. BCCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman was a permanent workman at P.B. Project since long with unblemished record of service . They submitted that in course of his service under the managementhent hewas implicated in a false criminal case by some interested persons and over that issue CBI had lodged a criminal case against him for allegedly accepting bribe for issuing L.P.C. to Shri Hemant Bauri . They submitted that as the concerned workman failed to represent his case properly before the Criminal Court he was convicted but against the order of conviction he preferred an appeal challenging the illegal and unjustified order of conviction . They alleged that the management by order dt. 10-2-94 dismissed the concerned workman from service as per provision ofclause 28 of the Certified S.O. without giving any scope to defend his case . Accordingly they submitted that the said order of dismissal of the concerned workman was illegal , arbitrary and it violated the principles of natural justice. They further submitted that invoking of clause 28 itself is void abinitio as clause 28 is ultra virus of the Constitution is exital delegation of power. They submitted that inspite of submitting representation to the management for reinstatement of the concerned workman to his service recalling the said order of dismissal as the management refused consider the same they raised an industrial dispute before the ALC ( C) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal . The Sponsoring Union accordingly submitted prayer before this Tribunal to pass an Award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman to his service with full back wages.

Onbehalfofthe workman Shri D. Mukherjee ,

Secretary, B.C.K.U.

Onbehalf of the emyloyers: Shri B.M. Prasad , Advocate

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad , the 19th February, 2003 AWARD

3 The management on the contrary after filing the W.S-cum-rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the sponsoring union asserted in the W.S. on behalf ofthe concerned workman. The management submitted that the concerned workman was convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude under Section 161 I.P.C. and Section 5 (2) ofthe prevention of Corruption Act and was sentenced to undergo R. I. for 2 years under Section 161 of the I.P.C. and 2 years under Section 5(2 ) of the Prevention of Corruption Act besides a fine of Rs . 100/- . The said order of conviction was passed by the learned special The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the 1.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to 2930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Judge, CBI , Dhanbad in case No. RC. 8/84 . They submitted that after receipt of the copy of the judgement and order passed by the Learned CBI Court Dhanbad in the aforesaid case No. RC. 8/84 they floated a Notesheet for taking disciplinary action against him by way of removal from his service under clause 28 of the Certified S.O. and put up note sheet before the C.M.D. of the Company who was the competent authority to take decision for dismissal /discharge of workman from his service dispensing with the provision of clause 26 or 27 of the Certified Standing Order. The C.M.D. of the Company passed the order of dismissal of the concerned workman from his service on the basis of his conviction in the aforesaid case as the offence coininitted by him was in the course ofperformance of his duties . They further submitted thatthe said order dt. 10-2-94 for dismissal of the concerned workman from his service under clause 28 of the S. O. was issued for commission of serious misconduct arising out ofconviction for an offence committed by him in course of his employment . Accordingly the management submitted that by passing the order of dismissal of the concerned workman from his service , they did not commit any illegality or took and arbitrary decision . They also denied the fact that they violated the principles of natural justice in dismissing the concerned workman from his service on the ground mentioned above. The management accordingly submitted their prayer to pass an Award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman .

4. The points to be decided in this reference are:--

Section 5 (2) ofthe Prevention of Corruption Act by Special Judge , CBI , Dhanbad ..It is the contention of the management that after receipt of thejudgement and order passed by the learned Special Judge , CBI in the aforesaid criminal case No. RC . 8/84 notesheet was initiated for conducting disciplinary action against the concerned workman by way of removal from his sevice under clause 28of the Certified . S.O. and the said notesheet was placed before the C.M.D. of the Company as C.M.D was the competent authority to take to such decision of discharge ofaworkman from his service dispensed with the provision ofClause 26 or 27 of the Certified S.O. and they further submitted that in dismissing the concerned workman from his sevice under the said provision of law they neither committed any illegality nor took any arbitrary decision. There was also no question of violating the principles of natural justice . The representative of the concerned workman in course ofhearing submitted that the concerned workman was convicted by the learned special Judge , CBI , asthe concerned workman could not properly defend his case in course of trial . However against that order of conviction they preferred an appeal before the higher forum. No incriminating material is forth coming before this Tribunal in course of hearing to show that what was the fate of the appeal in question . The concerned workman in course of hearing has failed to submit any order to the effect that the said order of conviction was stayed by the Hon'ble Appellate Court. As such accordingly to the materials available in the record there is sufficient scope to say that the concerned workman was dismissed from his service in view of order of conviction passed by the learned Special Judge , CBI , Dhanbad in connection with case No. R.C.8/84 .

"Whether the action of the management of P.B. Project of M/ s . B.C.C.L. in dismissing Sh . Fatik Chandra Roy, Clerk vide dismissal order No. PBP/Per/Dismissal/ 94 /71 /545-51 dt . 18-2-1994 under clause 28 of the certified standing order of the company w.e.f. 10-2-94 from the service of the company is justified ? If not, to what relief is the said work man entitled?"

6. It is the contention of the representative of the concerned workman that provision invoked in Section 28 has been declared ultra vires as it infringed the provision ofthe constitution of India and in support of such claim they relied on the decisions reported in 2002 (3 ) JLJ R 2000. Inthe decision reported in 2002 (3 ) JLJR 2000. Their Lord- ships observed that :

5. It is admitted fact that the concerned workman was an employee under the management . It is also admitted fact that the CBI had lodged a criminal case against the concerned workman for allegedly accepting bribe/gratification for issuing L.P.C. to Shri Hemant Bauri . It is also admitted fact that chargesheet against the concerned workman was submitted before the learned Special Judge , C.B.I. , Dhanbad against the accused person under Section 161 I.P.C. and Section 5 ( 2 ) of the prevention of Corruption Act. It is also admitted fact that trial of the concerned workman was conducted by the learned Special Judge, CBI , Dhanbad after framing charge against him under Section referred to above . Considering the submission of both sides there is no dispute to hold that the concerned workman was found guilty and sentenced to R.I. for 2 years for committing offence under Section 161 1.P.C. and fine Rs . 100/- and further sentenced to R.I. for 2 years under

"A bare reading of Para 28 suggests that a workman may be removed or discharge from service without following the procedure laid down inpara 27 relating to enquiry etc. after the Chairman cum-managing Director of the Company is satisfied , by reasons to be recorded in writing thatit is in expedient to hold such inquiry or that it is against the interest of security to continue to employ a workman . The expression " inexpedient " hasdirect relation with the holding of the inquiry. There is no recording or finding that the competent authority ever thought that the holding of the inquiry was inexpedient . Similarly, it has not been recordedby the competent authority that it would be against the interest of security to continue the [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

employment of the workman . Mere ipso dixit or bald assertion cannot be a substitute for the mandatory requirement of law, especially when the resultant consequence is as harsh as removal ofa person from service .

5. On the basis of the aforesaid observations , therefore, we are convinced that the impunged termination order suffers from the clear vice of arbitrariness and total improper exercise of jurisdiction and authority because of invocation ofParagraph 28 and by doing away with the requirement of holding inquiry in terms of Para 27 .

6. The judgement of the learned Single Judge passed in C. W.J.C. No. 1268 of 2001 is, accordingly, set aside . The impunged order dt . 14-5-1997 is also set aside and quashed. The setting aside of the impunged order, however, as is evidently clear being based on the wrong invocation of Para 28 of the certified standing orders would not come in the way of the respondents , if they think so, to proceed against the appellant writ petitioner de novo in accordance with law on the basis of the observations made hercin above . "

Clause 28 of the certified standing order speaks clearly "where a workman has been convicted for a criminal offence in a Court of law or where the Chairman/Managing Director ofthe Company is satisfied for reasons to be recorded in writingthat it is inexpedient or aganist the interest of security to continue to employ the workman , the workman may be removed or discharged from services without following the procedure laid down in Standing Order No. 27. This clause has two distinct parts . The first part is that , where a workman has been convicted for a criminal offence in a Court of law and the second part is where the Chairman/ Managing Director of the company is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded in writing , that it is in expedient or against the interest of security to continue to employ the workman, the workman may be removed or discharged from service without following the procedure laid down in standing order No. 27 , " the judgment which the representative of the concerned workman relied on and which has been discussed above relates to the order of dismissal of workman in connection with second part of clause 28 of the certified S. O. It is the contention of the concerned workman that the management committed illegality without holding any enquiry against the concerned workman and also without giving any opportunity to defend him in the said enquiry. It is seen that the criminal case was alleged by CBI against the concerned workman for his involvement of taking bribe/gratification for issuing L.P.C. to Shri HemantaBauri , After investigation CBI submitted chargesheet against the concerned workman before the Special Judge , CBI , Dhanbad . The charge accordingly was framed against the concerned workman under Section 161 I.P.C. read with 824 G1/03-25

2931

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Thereafter trial of the concerned workman was held by the learned judge in his presence where he got ample opportunity to defend his case . It is seen that the concerned workman was found guilty and convicted by learned Judge to the charge brought against him. No evidence is forthcoming to show that the said order of conviction passed against the concerned workman was seat aside by the appellate authority. Therefore it should be taken into consideration that the said order of conviction remained effective and the concerned workman had to undergo imprisonment in view of order ofconviction passed against him . Ifthe first part and clause 28 is taken in relation to the decision referred to above there is sufficient scope to say that in case of any conviction and sentence there is no scope to make further enquiry against the concerned workman as the said conviction amounts to serious misconduct which empowers theManaging Director to take immediate action against him. The picture , I consider, would have been different if it was established that the said order of conviction was set aside by the Hon'ble Appellate Court. As no such order is forthcoming I consider that the management did not commit any illegality or took any arbitrary decision violating the principles of natural justice in dismissing the concerned workman from service without holding fresh enquity. In the result, the following Award is rendered:

"The action of the management ofP. B. Project of M/s. B.C.C.L. in dismissing Sh . Fatik Chandra Roy, Clerk vide dismissal Order No. PBP/Per/Dismissal/ 94/71/545-51 dt. 18-2-1994 under clause 28 of the certified standing order of the company w.e.f. 18-2-94 from the service of the company is justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च , 2003

का. आ. 1098.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 128/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/419/94- आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 7th March , 2003

S.O. 1098. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 128/95 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of 2932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Governnient on6-3-2003 .

[No. L -20012/419/94- IR(C- I) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. II AT DHANBAD.

PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer.

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Sec . 10(1 ) ( d) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947

Reference No. 128 of 1995

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Sijua Arcas of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and their workmen .

APPEARANCES :

None

Onbehalf ofthe workman Onbehalf of the emyloyers Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate.

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 19th February, 2003

AWARD

3. The management on the contrary after filing W.S.- cum -rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the concerned workman asserted in their W.S. submitted on behalf of the concerned workman. They submitted that the concerned workman committed misconduct oftheft of copper wire and piece of woods and he was caught red handed and for which chargesheet was issued against him on the ground of misconduct on 12-1-91. The concerned workman replied to the chargesheet and denied the allegation levelled against him . But as his reply was not satisfactory the enquiry proceeding was started against him by order of the management . They submitted that the E.O. conducted the enquiry in presence of the concerned workman and he gave full opportunity was given to him to defend his case . After completion of enquiry the enquiry officer submitted his report holding the concerned workman guilty as the charge levelled against the concerned workman was established . As the allegation in question was serious in nature the disciplinary authority considering all aspects carefully dismissed him from his service. The management accordingly denied the fact that they dismissed the concerned workman illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principles of natural justice . Accordingly they submitted their prayer to pass an Award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman.

4. The points to be decided in this reference are :-- The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/419/94 - IR ( Coal - 1 ) , dated the 10th October, 1995.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Kankanee Colliery under Sijua Area No. V. of M/s . BCCL in dismissing Sri Rajmuni Bhuia from service w.e.f. 22-5-92 is justified? If not, to what relief Shri Bhuia is entitled?"

FINDINGS WITH REASONS

"Whether the action of the management of Kankance Colliery under Sijua Arca No. V of M/s . B. C. C. L. in dismissing Sh. Rajmuni Bhuia from service w.e.f 22-5-92 is justified? If not , to what relief Shri Bhuia is entitled?"

2. The case of the concerned workman aecording to the W. S. submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf in brief is as follows:

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman Rajmuni Bhuia was a permanent Miner Loader of Kankanee Collicry under the management. They submitted that the management issued a Chargesheet on 12-1-91 for alleged misconduct involving theft , fraud and dishonesty. They alleged that the said charge brought against the concerned workman by the management is false fabricated and motivated. They submitted that the contents of the chargesheet and the evidence are at variance as to whether the articles were alleged to have been contained in gunny bag or a cane basket or not. Accordingly they submitted that the finding of the E.O. was perverse and not supported by any valid evidence. They further alleged that on the basis of perverse report the management dismissed the concerned workman from service illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principles of natural justice. Accordingly the sponsoring union submitted their prayer to pass an Award directing the managementto reinstate the concerned workman in service with all consequential relief and back wages .

5. It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing of the instant case on merit , preliminary hearing was made to decide whether the domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principles of natural justice . In course of hearing on preliminary point learned Advocate for the concerned workman submitted categorically that he would not like to raise any question about the legality, propriety and fairness of the domestic enquiry. After careful consideration of the submission of the learned Advocate for the concerned workman as well as of the management and also after careful consideration of all papers in the record relating to preliminary enquiry it transpired that the enquiry officer conducted the domestic enquiry against the concerned workman fairly properly and maintaining the principles of natural justice, and accordingly vide Order No. 42 dt . 31-1-2002 I observed that the domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principles of natural justice . Accordingly at this stage I do not find any sufficient ground to reopen this issue for further discussion . Here the point for consideration is whether the charge which was brought against the concerned workman has been substantiated or 2933 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

not and also ifthe punishment inflicted upon the concerned workman deserve to be altered or not.

cross-examine the management's witnesses for the purpose his defence . Considering the cross -examination of the witnesses I have failed to find out any material relying on which it can be said that the concerned workman was falsely implicated in the instant case. Inspite of getting ample scope the concerned workman also did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence with a view to substantiate the claim ofhis innocence. Accordingly after careful considration ofall the facts and circumstances I find no cogent ground to hold that the management issued any false chargesheet against the concerned workman . On the contrary I am satisfied that the management has been able to substantiate with the charge brought against the concerned workman for committing misconduct as per clause 26( i) ( ii ) of the Certified S.O.

7. It is seen that on the basis of the enquiry report submittedby the E.O. marked as Ext . M- 3 series the disciplinary authority re -assessed the case and upheld the report in question and issued order of dismissal against the concerned workman vide letterdt . 21 /22-5-92 . Here the point for consideration is if there is any scope to reconsider the order ofdismissal issued against the concerned worman passed by thedisciplinary authority under Section 11A ofthe I.D. Act . It is seen that the concerned workman was caught red handed whilehewas trying to escape from the mine with an armoured copperwire measuring 6 feet worth ofRs. 600/-.After recovery the concerned workman failed to give any satisfactory explanation, how he got possession of the said wire . The said wirewas the property of the management and there is sufficient reason to believe that the concerned workman for the purpose of his own gain tried to take the said wire out of the mine causing loss to the property of the management. It is true that the value of the property is not so high but for that reason there is no scope to nunimise the offence committed by him. The concerned workman after stealing the property in question intended to go out of the mine when he was caught red handed. The act committed on his part appears to be serious in nature and in any way he cannot be said to be faithful worker of the management. Therefore, such worker whose attitude to drain out the property of the management cannot be trusted at all and, therefore , the management did not commit any mistake to issue chargesheet against him . I further hold that the management considering the gravity of the offence did not commit any mistake to dismiss the concerned workman from his service . Considering the gravity ofthe offence committed by the concerned workman I do not find any justification to alter the order of dismissal passed against the concerned workman invoking the provision of Section 11A of the I.D. Act .

Inthe result, the following Award is rendered:-

"The action of the management of Kankanee Colliery under Sijua Area No. V. of M/s . BCCL in dismissing Sri Rajmuni Bhuia from service w.e.f. 22-5-92 is justified . Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 6. It is seen that a chargesheet was issued against the concerned workman for committing misconduct under Clause 26/27 of the Certified S.O. The Chargesheet in course ofpreliminary hearing was marked as Ext. M- 1 . It transpires from the chargesheet that on 30-11-90 while the concerned workman came out from the mine with a basket he was searched and from inside the said basket one armoured copper cable 6 feet in length was found inside the said basket . It was kept beneath some rejected woods . The concernedworkman was searched by Ram Prasad Nonia in presence of C.M. Sarkar, Electrician and B.K. Singh Fitter. Thereafter the concerned workman was handed over to the CISF personnel for taking necessary legal action . Accordingly the concerned workman was arrested and produced before the Court. It is the contention of the management that while the concerned workman was caught red handed with the article he failed to give any satisfactory explanation relating to its possession . In course of enquiry proceeding the E.O. examined and recorded the statement ofwitnesses namely Ram Prasad Nonia , C.M..Sarkar, A.K. Sukla . The E.O. also recorded the statement of the concerned workman. Considering the statement of Ram Prasad Nonia it transpires that while the concerned workman wascoming out from the mine he was searched by him and inpresence of C.M. Sarkar and B.K. Singh and from inside the basket an armoured copper wire measuring 6 feet was recovered . He was taken to A.C.M and thereafter he was handed over to the CISF for taking legal action against him . C.M. Sarkar and A.K. Sukla also corroborated the statement given Ram Prasad Nonia. From the statement of the concerned workman I find that he was caught hold by the witness Ram Prasad Nonia and he disclosed that he was at that time carrying some pieces ofwood in the basket but he denied the fact of recovery of armoured copper wire from his possession. Considering the statement of the concerned workman it further transpires that he was forwarded to the local P.S. by the CISF along with the seized articles namely picces of woods , armoured copper wire. The concerned workman admitted that thereafter he was produced before the Court and was taken into Judicial custody and remained in Judicial custody for more than one month. Now considering the statement of the witnesses aswell as of the concerned workman I find no dispute to hold that an armoured copper wire was recovered from his possession along with some pieces of wood while he was coming from the Mine. It is the specific claim of the management that the said copper wire was the property of the management and the concerned workman was trying to take the same away unauthorisedly and thereby he committed misconduct as per clause 26( i) ( ii ) of the Certified Standing Order. No incriminating evidence is forthcoming on the part of the concerned workman how he got possession of the said armoured copper wire valued of Rs . 600 / - . The concerned workman got ample scope to 2934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च , 2003

Colliery under 9.4.2 of NCWA declaring him badli workers is justified ? If not , to what releif the workman is entitled to ?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to W.S. submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is as follows :-

का. आ. 1099.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण 11 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 128/98) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/149/97- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन . पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 7th March , 2003

S.O. 1099- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 128/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 06-03-2003 .

[No. L-20012/ 149/97 - IR(C- 1 ) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

3. The sponsoring Union submitted that Darogi Bhuian was a permanent wagon loader at Godhar Colliery since 1973. They disclosed that he died on 6-6-94 while he was in employment . As there is provision for employment to one dependent if any workman died in course of his employment according to the provision as laid down in NCWA- III the widow of the deceased i.e. Suhagi Bhuian applied for her employment in place of her husband but the management regretted to consider her prayer taking the pleathat such provision of N.C.W.A. III is not applicable to the dependent of any badli or casual worker . They submitted that the service of the deceased was regularised as permanent wagon loader of the Agent of the colliery vide office orderdt . 20-10-82 . Accordingly , management illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principles of natural justice have refused to provide employment to his widow. They submitted that thereafter , son of the deceased applied for employment under the said provision of law but that too was regretted by the management without assigning any reason . Accordingly , the sponsoring Union raised an industrial dispute which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for award .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) , AT DHANBAD.

Present: Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer.

In the matter of an Industrial Disputes under Section 10(1)( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO . 128 OF 1998

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management ofM/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman ,

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman :

None.

Shri D.K. Verma,

Onbehalf of the employers:

3. The management on the contrary after filing W.S. cum -rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the sponsoring union asserted in their W.S. They submitted that no right exists for employment of dependents in a Public Sector undertaking and no provision is contained in any agreement or rules relating to refusal of employment of dependent becomes illegal and void. They further disclosed that provisions contained in NCWAs are meant for guideline for consideration of employment of the dependents purely on compassionate ground and such provision cannot be considered as conferring any right on the workman to get their dependents employed.

Advocate.

State : Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal.

Dated , the 18th February,2003

AWARD

TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them uneder Section 10(1)( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/149/ 97-1R Coal - 1 , dated the 22nd April , 1998 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of denying employment to the dependent of Late Darogi Bhuian , Ex . Wagon loader of Godhar

4. It has been submitted by them that one Darogi Bhuian was a casual wagon loader at Industry colliery and he was brought on regular rolls by orderdt. 20-10-82 as he completed 240 days attendance as casual worker during previous year . They disclosed that the said workman left his employment from 1-11-83 without any permission or giving any information and became traceless . Considering that situation the management deleted his name from the list ofworkers of the company as he did not turn up for his work. They disclosed that according to the sponsoring union concerned workman died on 6-6-84 and for which they claimed initially for employment of his widow and thereafter his son after a lapsc of long period and for which such claim could not be considered and by refusing so 2935 [ भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 5 , 2003 /चैत्र 15, 1925

they did neither commit any illegality nor violated the principle of natural justice .Accordingly they has submitted their prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the sponsoring union.

5. The points to be decided in this reference are :---

"Whether the action of the management in denying employment to the dependent of Late Darogi Bhuian , Ex . Wagon loader of Godhar Colliery under 9.4.2 of NCWA declaring him badli workers is justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

6. DECISION WITH REASONS

lapse of long period and for which it is barred by the law of limitation but also it is fact that the said worker was no longer in service as on the ground of absentism his name was struck down from workers roll and for which there is no scope to entertain such claim . Therefore , considering the facts and circumstances it requires to be looked into if the concerned workman remained himself untraced since 1-11-83 and if his name was actually deleted from the workers roll or not . It is also to be taken into consideration ifthe concerned workman died on 6-6-84 when he was very much in service . Apart from these facts it is also to be looked into ifsuch claim for employment came after a lapse ofunreasonable delay, which led the management to regret the claim of the concerned workman . I have considered the record meticulously but from the record I have failed to find out any death certificate to show that Darogi Bhuian died on 6-6-84. No evidence is also forthcoming before the Tribunal to show that the concerned workman was actually in service while he died . There is also no evidence to show that immediately after his death such claim for employment was placed before the management . It is fact that provisions of N.C.W.A. has no statutory force . Such provision has been laid down to consider that in case of death of a workman his family does not face any serious economic hardship . Accordingly instead of statutory force , obligation comes in absolutely on compassionate ground and this aspect the management cannot avoid . It is the claim ofthe management that such claim came after a lapse of long period and for which it was barred by the law of limitation . Onus under these circumstances rest on the workman to establish that Darogi Bhuian was very much in service as wagon loader while he died and the claim for employment ofhis dependent was placed within reasonable period . The sponsoring union inspite of getting ample opportunities have misused to substantiate the claim in question . Accordingly, at this stage there is little scope to ignore the claim of the management . There is also no scope to say in view of my discussion above that management committed any illegality or violated the principle ofnatural jsutice in regretting employment in question .

In the result, the following award is rendered :-

Itisseen from the record that neither the sponsoring union adduced any evidence inspite of getting sufficient opportunities in order to substantiate the claim in question nor the management did so. Accordingly relying on the facts disclosed in the W. Statement - cum- rejoinder of respective parties let me consider ifthe concerned workman is entitled to get any relief or not . Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings there in no dispute to hold that Darogi Bhuian was initially a casual wagon loader at Godhar Colliery. The claim of the sponsoring union is that the concerned workman was regularised as permanent wagon loader by order of the Agent of the collierydt. 20-10-82 . They disclosed that said Darogi Bhuian died on 6-6-84 while he was very much in employment and accordingly the widow of the deceased submitted application for her employment which was regretted. Subsequently his son applied for his employment but that too was regretted . It has been alleged by the sponsoring union that inspite of specific provision as per clause 9.4.2 of N. C. W.A. to provide employment to the department the management has ignored the same illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice . On the contrary from the submission ofthe management I find a different picture . They disclosed that the service of Daroga Bhuian was brought on regular roll by order dt . 20-10-82 as he completed 240 days of attendance as a casual worker during previous year . They disclosed that thereafter the said worker left his service on 1-11-83 without prior permission or giving any intimation to them and for which his name was taken to badli list and thereafter his name was deleted from the list of workers as he did not report to his duty . According to the management he was no longer their workman as his name was deleted from the workers list.

" The action of the managementhent in denying employment to the dependent of Late Darogi Bhuian, Ex. Wagon loader of Godhar Colliery under 9.4.2 of NCWA declaring him badli workers is justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief."

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer .

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1100.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक 7. It is the contention of the sponsoring union that said Darogi Bhuia died on 6-6-84 and for which as per clause 9.4.2 of NCWA III his dependent is entitled to get employment on compassionate ground. The management on the contrary submitted that such provision of N.C.W.A. has got no statutory force and for which infringing the constitutional provision the sponsoring union as of right cannot claim such employment. The management submitted that the claim in question not only came forward after a 2936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 234/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/82/98- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 7th March , 2003

S.O. 1100.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.234/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-03-2003 .

[No. L-20012/ 82/98 - IR(C- 1 ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2), AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer.

In the matter of an Industrial Disputes under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947.

REFERENCE NO. 234 OF 1998

2. The case of the concerned workman according to W.S. submitted by the sponsoring Union on their behalf in brief is as follows . The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman were the permanent piece rated workman designated as M.C.L. posted at Bararee Colliery regulated under piece rated group of wages under group VA as per N.C.W.A- V . They disclosed that thereafter the management by order of 3 / 6-1-96 regularised the services ofthese workmen in Jobs under time rated nomenclature and fixed their scale of pay under NCWA - V and fitted him in the initial stage of scale of pay of respective categories . They disclosed that prior to the conversion of their wages in time rated categorieis/ scales of pay from piece rated group wages , the workmen used to enjoy the pay packet considering basic wages in piece rated group wages as per Group VA plus S.P.R.A. earned by an individual on the merit of the seniority as per NCWA . They submitted that the management while converted piece rated wages to time rated scale of pay they ignored the S.P.R.A. They earned as on date and simply fixed the basic pay on the initial stage one's category and for which the workman have sustained financial loss considering not only in the shape of basic pay and but also in other pay heads viz . S.D.A. , V.D.A. , Qly Bonus etc. They alleged that the action on the part of the management is ignoring S.P.R.A. arbitrarily amounts to denial to the seniority of a piece rated individual and causing disturbance to the pay packet is unjustified and illegal.

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management ofBararee Colliery of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and theirworkman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workmen :

None.

3. They submitted that to remove such ugly discrepancy they submitted representation to the management but as the management did not consider necessary to pay any importance to their prayer they raised an industial dispute before the ALC ( C ) Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for award .

On behalf of the:

Shri H. Nath,.

Employers

Advocate .

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal

Dated , Dhanbad, the 18th February, 2003

AWARD

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 82 / 98 - IR(C- 1 ) dated the 8th December, 1998 .

SCHEDULE

4. Management on the contrary after filing W.S.- cum -rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in their W.S. They submitted that initially the concerned workmen were appointed as piece rated Miner /Loader at Bararee Colliery . Thereafter , on their request as the job of piece rated Miner/Loaders are hazardous they were offered with time ratedjobs . They disclosed that after working for three years when there workmen approached them for regularisation in time rated jobs in the category and designation in which they were working their request was considered and accordingly their basic pay was fixed from 15-1-96 which was duly accepted by them .

"Whether the action ofthe management ofBararee. Colliery ofM/s . BCCL in not protecting the Group wages and S.P.R.A. of S / Sri Ramnath Yadav and 18 others , while fixing their pay at the time oftheir conversion from piece- rated jobs to time rated categories is justified ? If not, to what releif the workman are entitled ? "

5. They submitted that in all 74 loaders were regularised in different time rated designation and categories. Out of them only these workmen have raised the dispute without any justification . They submitted further that if any one is not willing to accept time rated scale in respective category, option is open to him to revert back to his original position as piece rated worker. They 2937 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

initially was piece rated workmen. On their request they were first allowed to work on time rated basis and thereafter their services were regularised as time rated worker in the category and designation in which they were working and accordingly, their basic pay was fixed from 15-1-96 which wasduly accepted by them . They further submitted that in all 74 loaders were regularised in different time rated designation and categories and out of them these 19 workmen have raised this dispute without any justification.

disclosed that some of the workmen have already opted for previous job of Miner/ Loader and they have already been reverted back . The concerned workmen have not exercised their option to go back as Miner /Loader on piece rated basic . Accordingly they submitted that the claim of the sponsoring Union is baseless . They denied the fact that they committed any illegality or took any arbitrary decision in not considering their claim . The management in view of their submission have submitted their prayer to pass an Award rejecting the claim ofthe workmen .

6. The points to be decided in this reference are :--

"Whether the action of the management of Bararee Colliery of M/ s BCCL in not protecting the Group Wage and S.P.R.A of S /Shri Ramnath Yadav and 18 others while fixing their pay at the time of their conversion from piece rated jobs to time- rated categories is justified ? If not, what reliefthe workmen are entitled ? "

7. FINDINGS WITH REASONS

As no oral evidence has been adduced by any of the side in order to substantiate their respective claim 1 have to rely on the papers available in the record in order to arrive into conclusion if the claim of the concerned workmen stands on any cogent footing and if they are entitled to get award in view oftheir prayer .

8. It is the contention of the management that the option heats with the workman if he is willingto work on time rated basis or piece rated basis and as that option is very much prevailing some workmen who opted to regularise their services as time rated worker have been reverted back to piece rated worker . It has been further submitted that the concerned workmen did not give any option and for which there was no scope to consider their claim. To rebut such claim of the management no cogent evidence is forthcoming on the part of the sponsoring union . The wages which a piece rated worker gets is according to the quantity of work performed by him . There isminimum yard stick of work which a piece rated worker shall perform to get the minimum wages but thereafter his wages varies according to the out put given by him . On the contrary the service condition of a time rated worker is quite different . A time rated worker when is placed in the category he is offered with the initial stage of the scale as per provision ofN.C.W.A. Therefore , the nature as well as service condition of the two categories of workers are quite different . No evidence is forthcoming to show that a worker is eligible to get pay protetion of the wages , when he is switched over to time rated worker. Accordingly, until and unless it is established that as per provision of NCWA they are entitled to get pay protection there is no scope to say that the management comitted any illegality to fix their pay in the initial stage of the category where they were fitted. Management clearly submitted that there is option for the workman to revert back to his original designation as piece rated workers . No explanation on the part of the sponsoring Union is forthcoming before this Tribunal if the concerned workman submitted any option to revert backto piece rated worker when they found that they have been sustained financial loss due to regularisation of their services as time rated workers . Every industry have to maintain norms in the matter of fixation of scale as per category of work within the ambit of N.C. W.A. As such onus rested on the sponsoring union to show that the management comitted illegality in fixation of the wages of the concerned workmen while their services were regularised as time rated worker from piece rated workers . Record will show clearly that inspite of giving sufficient opportunities the sponsoring union did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence to show that the management committed illegality in fixation of the wages Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workmen were miner / loader on piece rated basis at Bararee Colliery. It is the contention of the sponsoring Union that the service condition of those workmen were switched over to time rated as per direction of the managernent without regularising their service . Thereafter , when they took up the matter with the management they vide office order dt . 3/6-1-96 regularised their services in time rated categories as per N.C.W.A. - V and fitted them on the initial stage of scale of pay of respective categories . They disclosed that prior to conversion of their wages in time rated categories from piece rated group wages the workmen used to enjoy the pay packets considering basic wages in piece rated group wages plus S.P.R.A. eamed by an individual on the merit of the seniority . They alleged that when the services of the concerned workmen were converted to time rated the management simply fixed the basic pay on the initial stage ignoring the S.P.R.A which they enjoyed when they were piece rated workers and for which they have sustained financial loss . On the contrary it is the contention of the management that system ofpayment of wages are different to each categories . They disclosed that for piece rated workers there is no fixed scale of pay like that of time rated worker and for which when piece rated workman's service condition is switched over to time rated working condition their fitment is made in the initial stage of the category as per N.C.W.A. They submitted that the concerned workmen 2938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

Reference No. 19 of1996

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Moonidih Area of M/ s . BCCL .

AND

of the concerned workmen . While their services were regularised as Time rated workers . Accordingly, just relying onthe facts disclosed in the written statement I find difficult to uphold the contention of the sponsoring union . I find no hesitation to say that the workmen have lamentably failed to establish their claim and for which they are not entitled to get any relief.

Their Workmen .

Inthe result, the following Award is rendered:-

PRESENT : Shri S.H. Kazmi , PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers

None

FortheWorkman

None

"The action of the management of Bararee Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL in not protecting the Group wages and S.P.R.A. ofS /Sri Ramnath Yadav and 18 others , while fixing their pay at the time of their conversion from piece- rated jobs to time rated categories isjustified. Consequently , the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief."

State: Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

Dated, the 25th February, 2003 .

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2003

AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012 / 37 /95-1.R . (Coal - I ) dated 16-2-1996 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- sec . (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

का. आ. 1101.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 19/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/37/95- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the demand of the Union for placement of Shri M.P. Singh , Electrician Cat . IV to Cat . V with retrospective effect along with others who are junior to him isjustified ? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? " New Delhi , the 7th March , 2003

S.O. 1101. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.19/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 06-03-2003 .

[No. L-20012/37/95 - IR(C - 1 ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

2. It appears from the record that this reference was registered on 5-3-1996 and a date was fixed for appearance and for filingwritten statement by the workman or the union. Notices were also issued to the parties for that purpose, butthereafter at no point of time any appearance was made from the side of the workman nor the written statement was ever filed . Simply adjournment after adjournment was granted to enable the workman or the union to appear and filewritten statement . During the pendency of this reference ón several occasions notices were also sent even under registered cover . Even then no significant development could take place and till date the position reinains the same. It is thus evident that the concerned workman or the union is least interested inpursuing the dispute or the case any further. Since there does not appear to be any dispute left for being adjudicated it is needless to allow this case remain pending any further.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO.1 ), DHANBAD

Thisreference, as such , stands finally disposed of.

In the matter of a reference under sec . 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

S.H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer 2939

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

APPEARANCE :

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2003

For the Workman

: Sri V.V. Karthikeyan & M. Subramaniam , Advocates

For the Management : Sri M. Rajamanickam , Advocate का. आ. 1102.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 754/2001 ) की प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012 / 189/3801 - आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of1947), have referred the concerned Industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L- 12012 / 169 /2001 /IR(B - II ) dated 29-11-2001 .

New Delhi , the 10th March , 2003

S.O. 1102. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.754/2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Dena Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 7-03-2003.

On receipt of the order of reference from the Government of India Ministry of Labour , this case has been taken on file as I.D. No. 754/2001 and notices were sent to theparties tothe dispute by registered post, with a direction to appear before this Tribunal on 03-01-2002 to file their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement and to prosecute this case further . Accordingly, learned counsel on record on either side have filed their respective claim Statement and counter statement and prosecuted this case further.

[No. L - 12012/ 169/2001 - IR(B - II )]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

Upon perusing the Clafti Statement, Counter Statement, the rejoinder filed by the the 1 Party/Workman , documentary evidence let in on the side of the I Party/ Workman alone, the other material papers on record, after hearing the arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side and this matter having stood over till this date for consideration , this Tribunal has passed the following:-

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 26th February, 2003

AWARD

PRESENT : K. KARTHIKEYΑΝ , PresidingOfficer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 754/2001

The Industrial Dispüte referred to in the above mentioned order of reference by the Central Govt . for adjudication by this Tribunal is as follows :--

"Whether the action of the management of Dena Bank, Chennal fin imposing the punishment of dismissal from services on Shri S. Asoak , Cashier- cum-Clerk isjustified and legal ? If not what relief is he entitled to ? "

[Inthe matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofSub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), between the Workman Sri S.Asoak and the Management of Dena Bank].

BETWEEN

2. The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the I party./Workman Sir S. Asoak (hereinafter refers to as petitioner) are briefly as following:-

: 1 Party/Workman

Sri S. Asoak

AND

11 Party /Management

Thepetitioner was working in the II Party/Dena Bank atChennai- as a Cashier - cum - Clerk from 3-7-81 . His service was terminatedw.e.f. 9-6-99. The Petitioner was last working in Salem branch of the Respondent Dena Bank . Ever since The Regional Manager , Dena Bank , Chennai .

824G1/03-26 2940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

proper intimation given to Branch Manager . Accordingto Bipartite Settlement an appeal shall be disposed of within two months from the date of receipt of the appeal , but the Petitioner's appeal was considered only after six months by theAppellate Authority of the bank . The Petitioner has taken leave only for genuine reasons and in proper way . Thepetitioner has produced medical certificates according to Bipartite Settlement . The medical certificates produced by the Petitioner have been issued by qualified Doctors and hence they are acceptable as genuine and the same has been accepted by the medical board also . Hence , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass anAward against the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner with back wages and resultant benefits with continuity of service.

3. The II Party/ Dena Bank , Chennai has filed a . Counter Statement. The averments in the Counter Statement are briefly as follows :-

The 11 Party/Dena Bank management (hereinafter refers to as Respondent) has terminated the services of the Petitioner from the bank after conducting a departmental enquiry for the misconduct in terms of various provisions ofBipartite Settlement dated 19-10-66 . The averment ofthe Petitioner that he had been discharging his duties sincerely and efficiently without any blemish is incorrect and contrary to the fact as he had been arrested and let out on bail in respect of fraudulent payment of demand drafts resulting in loss likely loss of about Rs . 43.75 lakhs to the Responded/ Bank and the investigation is still in progress . The Petitioner was unauthorisedly absent without prior permission/ leave since 24-4-97 to 1-8-97 and again from 3-8-97 to 22-12-99 without any leave to his credit and without any prior permission. The Respondent issued a show cause notice dated 6-6-97to the Petitioner for his unauthorised absence from duty . The Petitioner has reported for duty from 1-8-97 and informed that he was sick and produced a certificate from the Assistant Surgeon , Siddique consultants . Further , the petitioner in his reply to show cause notice has assured to be regular in future. However , the Petitioner has breached the promise and chosen to remain absent again from 3-8-97 without obtaining sanction . The Respondent advised the Petitioner to appear before medical board of Govt. General Hospital and produce medical certificate from the Doctor not below the rank of Civil Surgeon ofGovernment General Hospital in respect of his health condition . However , the petitioner hasfailedto present before the medical board . Therefore , the Respondent issued a show cause notice again to the petitioner by his letter dated 17-11-97 . As the Petitioner has not submitted any reply to show cause notice , a show cause notice dated 7-1-98 was issued charging him to have committed the acts of misconduct in terms of Clause 19.5(e) and( b) and 19.7(a) and 19.7 (b) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966 modified from time to time with latest the date of his entry into service , the petitioner has been discharging his duties sincerely and efficiently and without any blemish whatsoever . He was suffering with bronchities (Asthma, ulcer and back pain complaints ) and he used to getwheezing and abdominal problems for which he used to take medical leave which were accepted by all the Branch Managers of Salem branch except Mr. Mony who is responsible for the charges of this case . The Petitioner was having asthmatic and gastricit problems and he had to take leave w.e.f. 24-4-97 to 1-8-97 and thereafter from 3-8-97 to 22-12-97. For all these absence , the petitioner has produced medical certificate from the Doctors who gave him treatment . The leave was taken for genuine reasons. Unfortunately, the Branch Manager Mr. C. Mony did not accept the medical certificates and the Petitioner was considered by him as absenting from work without leave and arranged to issue a charge sheet dated 7-1-98 to the Petitioner mentioning his absence as misconduct under different clauses of the Standing Orders of the bank. For the said charges the Petitioner gave reply dated 15-1-98 explaining in detail to the Disciplinary Authority and stated that he could not attend the office as he was on medical laeve and also due to genuine domestic reasons . Regarding the charges levelled against the petitioner , Charge Nos . 2, 3 and 5 are vague , The 4th Charge that the petitioner has taken leave without sufficient ground is not correct . The instructions of the Branch Manager that the Petitioner must produce medical certificate obtaining from a Civil Surgeon is unreasonable and impossible for any patient . Hence , the first charge levelled against the Petitioner is unlawful , unsustainable in law and unjustifiable . Because of the bias attitude of the Branch Manager Mr. Mony , the sick leave taken by the petitioner became a serious matter . As the Petitioner was sick during the enquiry period , he was unable to attend the enquiry in the month of September, 1998 , so he requested the Enquiry Officer to postpone the enquiry . The Petitioner also produced a medical certificate for the same for which the Bank/Management decided to refer him to the medical board . So they informed the Petitioner through their letter dated 5-9-98 sent by registered post to appear before the medical board . The Petitioner appeared before the medical board and the medical board as directed by the Respondent after testing recommended the Petitioner's leave and also accepted the Petitioner's medical certificate obtained from the Assistant Civil Surgeon as genuine . The domestic enquiry was conducted as a pre- determined one . The bias attitude of the authorities are all against natural justice . The findings ofthe Enquiry Officer is one sided , partial and biased . In their letter dated 26-7-2000 , the Assistant General Manager Dena Bank , Chennai has mentioned that the Petitioner was removed from service for the reason unauthorised absence . The punishment of dismissal of the petitioner from service for the sick leave taken by him is harsh , excessive and. disproportionate as per section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The Petitioner has taken leave with 2941

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7th Bipartite Settlement dated 14-2-1995 . The Petitioner into account .Hence the punishment order as referred to is self- explanatory and hence, no separate communication was warranted. As they have conducted the detailed enquiry with all available opportunity provided to the charge sheeted employee , the Respondent need not reply to each and every letters written by the Petitioner after his termination from service , based on the proceedings adopted as per the Standing Orders in force . The findings ofthe enquiry authority is self- explanatory and needs no further explanation . The bank has filed a FIR with the police authorities in respect of fraudulent payment of demand drafts involving loss ofaround Rs . 40,00,000/- to the bank. After preliminary investigation , the police authorities have arrested the Petitioner on 23-12-1997 and he was remanded topolice custody for 15 days from the said date . Thereafter , the Petitioner was released on conditional bail up to 19-1-1998 . The punishment awarded to the Petitioner by the Respondent is not harsh , excessive and disproportionate . It is true that the appeal was not disposed of within the time stipulated due to administrative exigencies and that alone can absolve the Petitioner from the clutches of law . Hence , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dismiss the petition withcost.

4. The Petitioner has filed a rejoinder . The averments in the rejoinder are briefly as follows:-

No charge sheet has been issued to the Petitioner for the alleged fraudulent act and it is a different criminal case pending in Salem Court . No staff or employee is barred from taking medical leave in the event of genuine situation ofsickness . It has not been proper in the domestic enquiry nor in charge sheet specifically mentioned as to how the work was affected due to sick leave taken by the Petitioner . Before punishing an employee any management is bound to give 2nd show cause notice which in this case , the management has given as a memo dated 6-3-99 but has failed to mention specifically about the past records of the Petitioner.

5. When the matter was taken up for enquiry finally , no one has been examined as a witness on either side . 33documents filed on the side of the I Party /Workman alone have been marked by consent as Ex Wl to W33 . No document has been marked as an exhibit on the side of the II Party/Management . Arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side were heard .

6.The point for my consideration is-

"Whether the action of the management of Dena Bank , Chennai in imposing the punishment of dismissal from services on Shri S. Asoak , Cashier- cum-Clerk is justified and legal ? If not what relief is he entitled to ?"

gave a reply on 15-1-1998 and it was found unsatisfactory, so the Respondent decided to proceed with the enquiry . The Petitioner did not explain in his statement as to why he could not appear before the Medical Board constituted for the purpose by the Govt . General Hospital at the request of the Respondent. It is prerogative to insist for a certificate from the Govt . Doctor not below the rank of Civil Surgeon when it was reasons to believe that the certificate given by the employee concerned may not be genuine on account of the Petitioner has not kept the branch officials informed immediately on falling sick on all occasions and has not bothered to inform about his sickness to the branch through anybody within the reasonable time . The reluctance of the Petitioner to appear before the Medical Board of General Hospital constituted for the purpose at the request of the Respondent clearly establishes that the statement the Petitioner was sick was not true. Further the reasoning of the Petitioner that such instructions could not be complied with on the ground of suffering from ailment which require immediate treatment is not tenable for the reason neither the ailment nor the period of ailment not justifies it. Because of the unauthorised absence of the Petitioner , the customer services was dislocated which in turn caused prejudice to the interest of the Respondent/Bank and likely to affect the Respondent/Bank's business . The Respondent is in service industry and the service to the customer is most important and can be provided only with adequate staff manning in the counters . Hence , it is in this context a charge has been levelled against the Petitioner and held correct. The fact that the absence of Petitioner from 3-8-1997 to till date of issuance of charge sheet i.e. 7-1-1998 itself establishes that the Petitioner was absent for a period in excess of 30 days without any sanctioned leave . Further , the Petitioner has confirmed that he was absenting without submitting the medical certificate . The Petitioner was irregular in attending the office as evidenced by the muster roll . It is true that during the departmental enquiry, he did not initially attend. The Petitioner after attending the hearing of the departmental proceedings has informed his inability to continue the proceedings on the plea of sickness and sought adjournment . Thereafter , the Petitioner was referred to Medical Board which the Petitioner attended. The Respondent on finding that the Petitioner was medically unfit did not hesitate to regularise his absence for such period of rest advised by the Medical Board. The enquiry authority also adjourned the enquiry proceedings as requested. Thus , the management has acted without any bias towards the Petitioner. All the principles ofnatural justice were followed and the Petitioner was given all the opportunities . In the punishment order dated 6-3-97 , it has been clearly mentioned that his past record has been taken into account , while imposing the punishment upon him and does not necessary as per the Bipartite Settlement to elaborate the details of the past service taken 2942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL, 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Point:-

The Petitioner/Workman Sri S. Asoak has raised this industrial dispute stating that the action of the management of Dena Bank, Chennai in imposing the punishment of dismissal from the bank service as illegal . The Petitioner was working as a Clerk in the Respondent/ Bank .It is not disputed that the Petitioner had been arrested and let out on bail in respect of fraudulent payment of demand drafts to the tune of about Rs . 43.75 lakhs and the investigation of criminal case is still in progress . It is also admitted that the Petitioner had not attended the office from 24-4-97 10 1-8-97 and again from 3-8-97 to 22-12-97 .It is the contention of the Petitioner that for all these absence due to his illness , he had produced medical certificates from the Doctors who gave him treatment and had taken leave for genuine reasons and the Branch Manager did not accept the medical certificates and considered that the Petitioner was absenting for work without leave. It is the contention of the Respondent/ Bank management that the Petitioner was unauthorisedly absent without prior permission/leave during the said period and he was not having any leave to his credit for thatperiod . It is admitted that the Respondent/Bank has issued a charge sheet dated 7-1-98 mentioning that he was unauthorisedly absent for duty which amounts to a misconduct as per clauses 19.5(a) , 19.5 (j ) , 19.5 (p ), 19.7(a) and 19.7 (b ) of the Standing Order of the bank . The said charge sheet is Ex . W3 . It is further contended by the Respondent/Bank that a show cause notice dated 6-6-97 was issued to the Petitioner for his unauthorised absence from duty and the Petitioner had reported for duty on 1-8-97 informing the Respondent/Management that he was sick and had produced a certificate from the Assistant Surgeon and that in the reply submitted by the Petitioner to the show cause notice he had assured to be regular in future, but however , he has breached his promise and chosen to remain absent for duty again from 3-8-97 without obtaining any sanction . In the rejoinder filed by the Petitioner he has averred that it is true that he has assured to be regular in future in explanation submitted to the show cause notice dated 6-6-97 . But he has not denied that averment in the Counter Statement that he continued to remain absent from duty from 3-8-97 without obtaining sanction and he failed to present before the medical board in spite of the Respondent/Management advised him to appear before the medical board of the Govt . General hospital and to produce medical certificate from the Doctor not below the rank of Civil Surgeon of the Govt. General hospital in respect of his health condition and that he was issued a show cause notice again vide office letter dated 17-11-97 and as the Petitioner has not submitted any reply to the show cause notice , charge sheet dated 7-1-98 had been issued to him , which is Ex . W3 . In this Ex . M3 itself, it is mentioned that a show cause notice dated 17-11-97 was issued to him for which he had failed

to submit his explanation , even after a lapse of more than a month . The said show cause notice dated 17-11-97 has been filedbythe Petitioner himself as Ex . WI . Ex. W2 is the xerox copy ofthe letter dated 26-11-97 sent by the Petitioner to the Branch Manager of the Respondent/Bank at Salem , requesting him to give one month's time to submit his reply to the show cause notice dated 17-11-97 . It is not his contention that subsequent to his letter dated 26-11-97 under Ex. W2 , he has submitted any explanation to the show cause notice under Ex . WI . In Ex.W3 charge sheet itself, it is clearly averred that he had failed to submit his explanation even after a lapse of more than a month. It is not disputed as incorrect . As the Petitioner has not submitted his reply to the show cause notice under Ex .WI , a charge sheet under Ex.W3 has been issued to the Petitioner . The said contention of the Respondent in their Counter Statement has not denied as incorrect . The Petitioner was asked to submit his explanation under Ex. W3 . It is admitted that the Petitioner has submitted his reply on 15-1-98 . The Respondent/Management having notsatisfied with the reply of the Petitioner has conducted an enquiry . The xerox copy of that enquiry proceedings is Ex.W7 . It is also admitted that pending enquiry the Petitioner has informed the Enquiry Officer about his inability to attend the enquiry on the plea of sickness and sought adjournment and thereafter , the Petitioner was referred to Medical Board and the Medical Board after examining the Petitioner had advised rest for the Petitioner for some period and the Respondent/Management had regularised the absence of the Petitioner for such period of rest as advised by the Medical Board and had also adjourned the enquiry proceedings as per request . As it is contended by the Respondent/ Management in their Counter Statement , the management has acted without any bias towards the Petitioner . After having conducted letailed enquiry by providing sufficient opportunity to the charge sheeted employee , the Enquiry Officer has submittedhis report with his findings . The xerox copy of the Enquiry Officer's report containing his findings has been sent to the Petitioner with the covering letter dated 5-1-99 . It is Ex . W8 . The Enquiry Officer has given his finding in his report stating that the charges levelled against the charge sheeted employee were proved beyond doubt . Then a memo dated 6-3-99 was issued to the Petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority as a 2nd show cause notice proposing the punishment to be imposed on him for the proved misconduct of the Petitioner as per the findings of the Enquiry Officer . The said memo is Ex. W9 . Inthat memo itself, the Petitioner was advised to be present for personal hearing and to make his submission regarding the proposed punishment . In spite of an opportunity was given by the Disciplinary Authority for the personal hearing to the Petitioner and to put forth his submission in respect of the proposed punishment, the Petitioner has not attended the personal hearing, though at his request 2943

भारत. का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

the order passed by the High Court in W. P. No. 12443/98 filed by the Petitioner . The said order has been passed by theHigh Court in respect of the Petitioner's representation for non -payment of subsistence allowance during the period of his suspension . The Petitioner has sent a letter dated 1-9-98 to the Branch Manager , Dena Bank along with the order copy of the High Court in Writ Petition requesting him to pay the subsistence allowance . The copy of that typed written letter dated 1-9-98 is Ex .W32 . Ex. W33 is the letter dated 7-10-98 sent by the Assistant General Manager to the Petitioner in respect of his representation for the payment of subsistence allowance .

7. The contention of the Respondent/Management that the Petitioner when absenting himself for work on the ground of illness , has not obtained prior sanction of leave and only after a month's time , he gave leave letter requesting medical leave and that was on 25-6-1997 . This has not been denied by the Petitioner . Further, it is alleged by the Respondent/ Management that the Petitioner has produced certificates given by different Doctors , when he was advised to produce a medical certificate from a Civil Surgeon . He has not produced the same. Ex . W5 is the letter given to the Petitioner by the Branch Manager , Salem , informing him that the Petitioner has been advised time and again to produce medical certificate not below the rank ofCivil Surgeon whenever he goes on leave on medical grounds . But he has submitted medical certificates obtained from one Assistant Surgeon/ Siddha Consultants which cannot be accepted by them . It is not disputed that the Petitioner has attended office on 1-8-97 and promised to be regular from 2-8-97 but , he remained absent from 3-8-97 without prior intimation or obtaining prior permission for getting sanction as a leave for his absence . It is also not disputed that the Petitioner remained absent for duty from 3-8-97 till the issuance of charge sheet dated 7-1-98 without getting any sanction or leave for the period ofhis absence . It is also not disputed by the Petitioner that he remained absent for that period without submitting any medical certificate . It is also seen from the records , when the departmental enquiry has been conducted , he expressed his inability to attend the enquiry on medical grounds and hence he was referred to Medical Board and theMedical Board on examination , gave a report advising to treat his absence as medical leave and accordingly the management has regularised his absence for the period advised by the Medical Board and has adjourned the enquiry proceedings also as per the request of the Petitioner . It cannot be disputed that in spite of instructions thatthe Petitioner has not obtained certificate from a civil surgeon and submitted the same to the Respondent/ Management to be treated his absence as medical leave . So , this amounts to a wilful insubordination or disobedience of lawful and reasonable order of the management or of the superior as per clause 19.5 ( e ) of Bipartite Settlement dated 14-2-95 . It is also not disputed it has been adjourned to various dates . Then the Disciplinary Authority has passed a final order dated 9-6-99 after considering the entire materials inclusive of the Enquiry Officer's report, the gravity of the proved misconduct of the Petitioner and the past records . The xerox copy of the same is Ex. W10 . Thus , the Disciplinary Authority has passed an order against the Petitioner under Ex .WI0 by dismissing him from the Bank's service without any notice . Then the Petitioner has preferred an appeal to theAppellateAuthority for which the Appellate Authority sent a letter dated 21-2-2000 to the Petitioner directing him to appear for personal hearing with his representative . The said letter is Ex .Wll . The Appellate Authority after considering the plea of the Petitioner in his appeal and also entire materials in respect of the domestic enquiry conducted against the Petitioner passed an order dated 23-3-2000 stating that he find no reason to interfere with the order of punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority against the Petitioner. The xerox copy of the Appellate Authority's order was sent to the Petitioner by the ChiefManager with a covering letter dated 24-3-2000. The same is Ex . W12 . Ex . W24 is the carbon copy of the appeal petition presented by the Petitioner to the Appellate Authority. For the letter dated 27-1-2000 of the Appellate Authority, the Petitioner had sent a letter dated 19-2-2000 to the Branch Manager of Dena Bank at Salem. The copy of the same is Ex.W25 . In that letter , he requested the Branch Manager to send him Rs . 1000/- by money order to meet the expenses to go to Bombay to attend the personal hearing before the Appellate Authority . Ex. W 26 is the carbon copy ofthe letter dated 15-2-2000 sent by the Petitioner to Appellate Authority, Bombay requesting him to permit him to engage a lawyer as defence representative in the personal hearing to be conducted in Chennai on 26-2-2000. Ex .W27 is the copy ofthe minutes of personal hearing against the Petitioner conducted by the Appellate Authority, which is enclosed with the written submissions made by the Petitioner to the Appellate Authority . Ex .W28 is the xerox copy of the letter dated 5-9-98 sent by the Branch Manager of Dena Bank, Salem to the Petitioner . It was sent pending enquiry against the Petitioner for the charge sheet issued to him under Ex .W3 . In that letter, the Petitioner was advised to appear before the Medical Board of Govt . Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical Hospital , Salem on 15-9-98 . Ex. W29 is the xerox copy of the report of the Regional Medical Board , giving by the Board after examining the Petitioner . It is stated in that report that the medical certificate issued to the Petitioner for the period from 5-9-98 to 20-9-98 by the qualified Medical Officer may be regularised as leave on medical grounds and that he was found not recovered from his illness , he was recommended leave for 18 days from 21-9-98 . It is not denied that a case has been registered asD.K. Crime No. 17/97 in the District Crime Branch Police station at Salem against one Mr. Ravi Kumar. The certified copy of that FIR is Ex . W30 . Ex . W31 is the xerox copy of 2944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

T that on the basis of the recommendation by the Medical Board the period of absence of the Petitioner for duty has been regularised as loss of pay since there is no leave at his credit . It is not the plea of the Petitioner that he was bedridden during that period of alleged sickness . No proof in support of his inability to attend the work on the ground that he was bed ridden due to illness has been produced by the Petitioner. It is also not his case that he has no people to inform his inability to attend work due to his sickness . Admittedly he has not taken any effort to inform the bank management through his people by submitting a leave letter seeking medical leave on the ground of his sickness . A perusal of the Appellate Authority's order also shows that the past record of the Petitioner has been considered by the Appellate Authority . The entire proceedings ofthe Enquiry Officer filed as Ex . W7 shows that the Petitioner as a charge sheeted employee was given a fair chance to submit his defence effectively in the enquiry. On the basis of the available materials both oral and documentary the Enquiry Officer has given a finding in his report that all the charges levelled against the Petitioner have been proved . It cannot be said that the Enquiry Officer has given a perverse finding without any substance or evidence as basis . The proceedings of the Disciplinary Authority as well as the Appellate Authority also disclose that sufficient opportunity had been given to the Petitioner and he has availed the same and has represented his grievance before the Disciplinary Authority as well as the Appellate Authority in the personal hearing accorded to him . So, under such circumstances , as it is decided by the Supreme Court in a case reported 1998 I LLJ 629 SC SECRETARY TO GOVT. HOME DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS VS. SRI VAIGUNDANATHAN, " this Tribunal cannot interfere with the findings of the Enquiry Officer unless the findings are perverse and not supported by any evidence" .

imposing the punishment on him . The Appellate Authority also in his order dated 23-3-2000 stated that the punishment imposed on him by the Disciplinary Authority as dismissal from bank service without notice is proportionate to the gravity of his misconduct and he did not find any reason to interfere with the same . The admission of the Petitioner thathe was absent for duty due to ailment from 24-4-97 to 1-8-97 and from 4-8-97 to 10-8-97 due to his father's ailment and again from 10-8-97 to 25-8-97 due to his father's ailment and from 26-8-97 for six weeks and 13 days from 8-10-97 and 15 days from 20-10-97 and from 3-11-97 for one and halfmonths till 17-12-97 due to his ailment and on 18-12-97 without attending office he applied for five days medical leave. All these things go to show that he was very irregular in attending office and had unauthorisedly absent for work without prior intimation or sanction of leave. It is also his admission that he was arrested by police on 23-12-97 on a criminal complaint and he came out on bail on 6-1-98 . So all these things go to show that he had committed misconduct as per the provisions of the Bipartite Settlement mentioned in the charge memo under Ex.W3 and the same has been proved to be the misconduct committedby him in the domestic enquiry conducted against him and the punishment awarded by the Disciplinary Authority for the proved misconduct is not disproportionate to the gravity of the proved misconduct ofthe Petitioner . It cannot be said that the punishment awarded by the Disciplinary Authority for the proved misconduct of the Petitioner is harsh , excessive and disproportionate . It is admitted that the Petitioner could not justify his absence for duty with acceptable evidence . Therefore , the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority on the Petitioner for his proved misconduct cannot be held to be a disproportionate one . So, there is no scope for this Tribunal to interfere with the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority on the Petitioner by exercising its power under section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Under such circumstances , it can be held that the action of the management of Dena Bank , Chennai, in imposing the punishment of dismissal from services on Sri S. Asoak , Cashier - cum- Clerk is justified and legal . Hence , the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief. Thus , the point is answered accordingly .

9. In the result , an Award is passed holding that the concerned workman Sri S.Asoak is not entitled for any relief. No Cost .

(Dictated to the Stenographer , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 26th February , 2003. )

K. KARTHIKEYAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :-

Oneither side

: None

8. It is proved in the domestic enquiry with sufficient and acceptable evidence let in by the management before the Enquiry Officer that the Petitioner has remained unauthorisedly absent without intimation continuously for the period exceeding 30 days , it constitute as a gross misconduct in terms of Clause 19.5( p ) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 14-2-95 . There is also evidence to that effect that the Petitioner had absented for duty without leave which is defined as misconduct under clause 19.7 ( a ) of the Bipartite Settlement . A perusal of the Enquiry Officer's report Ex -W8 clearly shows that the Enquiry Officer has come to the conclusion that the charges levelled against the Petitioner under Ex. W3 have been proved after duly analysing the evidence let in by the management both oral and documentary against the Petitioner . In the punishment order dated 6-3-99, it has been clearly mentioned that the past record of the Petitioner has been considered by the Disciplinary Authority while [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2945

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15 , 1925

Documents Exhibited :-

For the Iparty/ Workman :

Date

Ex. No.

Description

W1 17-11-97 Show cause notice issued to Petitioner .

W2 26-11-97 Reply given by Petitioner to show cause notice .

W3 07-01-98 Charge sheet issued to Petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority.

W4 15-01-98 Xerox copy of the reply given by Petitioner to charge sheet .

W5 25-06-97 Xerox copy of the reply given by Respondent/Bank to Petitioner requesting grant of leave.

W6 18-12-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Bank to Petitioner .

W7 06-05-98 Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings .

W8 05-01-99 Xerox copy of the letter from Disciplinary Authority to Petitioner enclosing the findings and report of the Enquiry Officer.

W9 06-03-99 Xerox copy of the dismissal order issued by Disciplinary Authority to Petitioner.

W10 09-06-99 Xerox copy of the memo issued by Respondent/Bank to Petitioner .

W11 21-02-2000 Letter from Appellate Authority to Petitioner with regard to engagement oflawyer by the Petitioner .

W12 24-03-2000 Letter from Chief Manager of Respondent/Bank to Petitioner enclosing speaking order dated 23-2-2000.

W13 26-07-2000 Xerox copy of the comments submitted by Respondent Bankto Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ).

W14 02-05-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner toBranch Manager.

W15 08-06-98 Letter from the Petitioner to Enquiry Officer.

W16 05-06-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Branch Manager to Petitioner .

W17 16-06-98 Xerox copy of theletter from Petitioner to Branch Manager .

W18 08-07-98 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to Enquiry Officer.

W19 06-07-98 Xerox copy of the medical certificate submitted by Petitioner .

W20 14-12-98 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to EnquiryOfficer.

W21 31-03-99 Letter from the Petitioner to Disciplinary Authority.

W22 . 15-05-99 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to Disciplinary Authority .

W23 05-06-99 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner toDisciplinary Authority.

W24 23-07-99 Xerox copy ofthe appeal preferred by the Petitioner to Appellate Authority.

W25 19-02-2000 Letter from Petitioner to Branch Manager.

W26 15-02-2000 Letter from Petitioner to Appellate Authority requesting to permit him to engage a lawyer .

W27 26-02-2000 Minutes of personal hearing in the appeal of Petitioner before the Appellate Authority .

W28 05-09-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Branch Manager to Petitioner.

W29 17-03-97 Xerox copy ofthe medical report issued by Regional Medical Board .

W30 17-03-97 FIR filed in Salem Police Station against Ravikumar .

W31 19-08-98 Certified copy of the order of High Court in W.P. No. 12443 of 1998 & WMP No. 18913/98 .

W32 01-09-98 Typed copy of letter from Petitioner to Branch Manager with regard to subsistence allowance .

W33 07-10-98 Letter from the Respondent/Bank to the Petitioner with regard to subsistence allowance .

For the Il Party/ Management :-Nil .

2946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

AND

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2003

: II Party/Management The Assistant General Manager ( TN II) .

Bank of Baroda, Coimbatore .

Appearance

For the Claimant :

M/s . Aiyar & Dolia, & Mr. C.R.Chandrasekaran , Advocates

का. आ. 1103 -औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ोदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 646/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-3-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Forthe Management : Sri . K.S.V. Prasad & P. Bhaskaran , Advocates [सं. एल-12013/67/ 98- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th March , 2003

The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause ( d) of Sub section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2( A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , have referred the concerned industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No.L - 12013 /67 /98 /IR( B - II ) dated 22-01-1999 .

S.O. 1103.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.646/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen, which was received by the Central Govemment on 11-3-2003 .

[No. L- 12013/67 / 98 - IR( B - II )] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT. CHENNAI

Thursday, the 27th February , 2003

PRESENT :

K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 646/2001

(Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court CGID No. 1 14/99)

This reference has been made earlier to the Tarnil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai , where the same was taken on file as CGID No. 114/99 . When the matter was pending enquiry in that Principal Labour Court , the Government of India. Ministry of Labour was pleased to order transfer of this case also from the file of Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court to this Tribunal for adjudication . Onreceipt ofrecords from that Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court, this case has been taken on file as I.D. No.646 /2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on record on either side informing them about the transfer of this case to this Tribunal, with a direction to appear before this Tribunal on 19-10-2001 with their respective parties and to prosecute thiscase further. Accordingly , the learned counsel on either side along with their respective parties have appeared and prosecuted this case further . The Claim Statement of the I Party/Claimant was filed earlier before the Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court , Chennai , when the matter was pending there for adjudication and the Counter Statement ofthe II Party /Management was filed before this Tribunal after the case has been transferred from the Principal Labour Court to this Tribunal for adjudication .

In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the workmen and the Management of Bank of Baroda. Coimbatore .

Upon perusing the Claim Statement , Counter Statement , the additional Counter Statements , the documentary evidence let in on either side , the other material papers on record, the written arguments filed by the learned counsel on either side and this matter having stood over tillthis date for consideration , this Tribunal has passed the following:

BETWEEN

AWARD

I Party/Claimant

The General Secretary Bank ofBaroda Employees Association, Coimbatore. :

The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above order of reference by the Central Govt . for adjudication by this Tribunal is as follows :-

2947 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

2. The General Secretary Bank of Baroda Employees Association , Coimbatore has raised this industrial dispute espousing the cause of the workman Sri P.Subramanian challenging the action of the II Party/ Management Bank of Baroda in withholding his promotion for three years as unjustified.

3.The facts of the case are briefly as follows :-

condition contained therein i.e. the foundation course is equivalent to matriculation/ SSC and the recognition of the sameby the Government as of 15-09-1983 and that in case ifthe said course is not recognised by the Government the appearance in the written test would be treated as void . This material fact was suppressed by the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian. Even by April , 1984 pre- foundation course was not so recognised by the Tamil Nadu Government and hence the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian was not called for interview along with other eligible candidates . The Govt. recognised the pass in the second year of foundation course as equivalent to XII or HSC or pre - university course only by Government order dated 18-05-1985 . However, after coming to know that the recognition order dated 18-5-95 , the management took a sympathetic view and promoted the concerned workman Sri P.Subramaniam from sub - staff to clerical cadre w.e.f. 19-2-86 without asking him to go through the process again from the beginning . Mr. P.Subramanian has accepted the offer of promotion issued by the bank vide letter dated 14-3-86 without reserving any right to raise any dispute and that the dispute was raised after a lapse of nearly nine years and that the dispute was hit by laches . This was raised as a preliminary objection before, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) . The concerned workman was assigned the duties of Head Cashier category on 19-06-1998 and it was not accepted by him on 22-6-98 . He was assigned those duties at Pethappampatti branch w.e.f. 22-6-98 and now he is working as Head Cashier C at Pethappampatti branch . Hence , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dismiss the claim in this industrial dispute raised by the I Party/Union .

4.When the matter was taken up for enquiry, no one has been examined on either side as a witness . With the consent of the learned counsel on either side , documents filed on either side have been marked as Ex . Wl to W6 and Ml to M6 respectively . Learned counsel on either side has filed their respective written arguments.

5.The point for my consideration is - The concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian was a subordinate staff attached to Pollachi branch of the Respondent/Bank . He has passed 2nd year examination conducted by the Madurai Kamaraj University's open university foundation Course in May , 1983 which is equivalent to a pass in XI and XII standards of Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Schools . A certificate was issued to that effect by Controller of Examinations in reply to the letter from the DEO . A certificate dated 25-08-83 was issued by Controller of Examinations , Madurai Kamaraj University . Acall letter for written test on 23-10-1983 was issued to the concerned workman by the Respondent/ Management. He appeared for written test and passed as per the Respondent's letter dated 21-11-1983 . Though the interview was conducted on 04-04-1984 for all those who have passed the test , the concerned workman was not called for interview . Hence , he made several representations . The Respondent/Management wrote a letter dated 25-01-1986 calling for interview . The Respondent/Management advised the concerned workman vide its letter dated 14.3.86 that he was promoted to clerical cadre and posted at Pethappampatti branch on promotion . The concerned workman's request to advance his date ofpromotion to the date on which the others who have passed the written test held on 23-10-1983 and were promoted was not acceded to . The Petitioner Union raised the dispute on 31-12-1994 alleging that it amounts to withholding of promotion for three years .

"Whether the action of the management in withholding the promotion of Shri P.Subramanian for 3 years when similarly situated employee has been promoted isjustified or not ? If not justified , to what relief Sh P.Subramanian is entitled?" The Respondent/Management in its Counter Statement as well as two Additional Counter Statements has stated denying the averments of the Petitioner Union in their Counter Statement and they are briefly as follows: ---

Point: -

This industrial dispute has been raised by the General Secretary Bank of Baroda Employees Association , challenging the action of the Respondent/Bank of Baroda management in withholding the promotion of Sri P.Subramanian for three years as unjustified . The concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian was working as a subordinate staff at Pollachi branch of Respondent/Bank The certificate issued by the Controller of Examinations , Madurai Kamaraj University has no relevance asthe second year of foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University was recognised only on 18-05-85by Tamil Nadu Government as an equivalent to a pass in matriculation examination or PUC examination . The concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian was issued call letter dated 12-10-1983 to appear for written test on 23-10-1983 , it was subject to a

824 G1 /03-27 2948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART 11--SEC. 3( ii ) ]

copy of the same is Ex.M1 . In that call letter itself, a condition has been mentioned as follows:

"since you have claimed eligibility for the promotion onhaving passed foundation course , you are allowed to appear for written test on 23-2-83 subject to verification as to whether the course is equivalent to Matriculation/ SSC and recognition ofthe same by the Govt. as of 15-9-1983. In case, the said course is not equivalent to Matriculation/SCC and not recognised by the Gort, please note that the appearance in the written test will be treated as void."

Accepting this condition the said Sri P. Subramanian attended the written test, and he passed the test and become eligible for interview as he was advised by the RespondentA Managernentby their letter dated 21-12-83 under Ex .WI . It is the contention of the Petitioner Union that this condition in any event is not applicable to the concerned workman, since the workınan has passed the 2nd year foundation course ofwhich this condition does not speak and that the concerned workman has chosen to clarify and produced Ex. W4 a certificate dated 25-8-83 issued hy Controller of Examinations informing that a pass in the first and second year of the foundation course examination is equivalent to pass in XI and XII standards examination of Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Schools . It is the contention of the learned counsel for the I Party/Union that these Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary School standards are the required qualification for promotion from sub- staff cadre to clerical cadre according to Ex.M3 bank policy of promotion to clerical cadre, but Ex . M3 does not in any event or in régard to any qualification'say that such a qualification shouldbe recognisedby the Govt . But it is the contention of the learned counsel for Respondent/Management that the management learnt that the said course was not so recognised and no doubt that the concerned workman has completed the course and got the course certificate dated 27-1-1984 from Madurai Kainaraj University under Ex .W5 . Buthe would further contend that in the certificate Ex. W4 issued by Controller of Examinations, there is nothing to show that the Govt . had so recognised the said course and the management learnt on such recognition by the Govt . by a G.O. dated 18-5-1985 and the xerox copy of the same is Ex.M2 and only after that the Respondent/ Management decided to call the concerned workman for interview and the said call letter dated 25-1-1986 is Ex . W2 . In that call letter also, it is stated that it is in consequent upon the recognition of the foundation and pre - foundation course ofMadurai Kamaraj University and the concerned workman wasgiven a letter dated 14.3.86 under Ex . W3 informing him about his promotion to clerical cadre with effect from 19-2-86 . It is the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent that the management has done so out of sympathetic consideration and the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian has accepted the promotion on 14-3-86 inthe year 1983. A call letter for the written test on 23.10.83 was issuedto the concerned workman for promotion to the clerical cadre. The concerned workman has passed the 2nd year exam conducted by the Madurai Kamaraj University in May, 1983. It is the contention ofthe Petitioner Union that the concerned workman has passed 2nd year exam conducted by Madurai Kamaraj University in May , 1983 and a pass in that exam is equivalent to a pass in XI and XII standards of Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Schools and a certificate dated 23-8-83 to that effect was issued by the Controller of Examination in reply to a letter from D , F.O. The concerned workman has appeared for the written test and had passed the same . The Respondent/ Management has also issued a letter dated 21-11-1983 to that effect. Then an, interview was conducted on 4.4.1984 for all those who passed the test except the concerned workman. The concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian was not called for interview. But it is the contention of the Respondent / bank management that the certificate issued byController ofExaminations , Madurai Kamaraj University had no relevance as 2nd year foundation course ofMadurai Kamaraj University was recognised only on 18-5-1985 by theGovt. as equivalent to a pass in matriculation on clause 12 of Higher Secondary or PUC.It is their further contention that a call letter was issued to Sri P. Subramanian dated 12-10-1983 to appear for written test on 23-10-1983 . Itwas subjected to a condition contained therein that his claim that foundation course was equivalent to matriculation/SSC and recognition of the same by the Govt . as of 15-9-83 and that in case , the said course was not recognisedby Govt, the appearance in the written test would be treated as void. However , after coming to know about the recognition by the Govt . w.e.f. 18-5-1985 though the appearance was void as per the condition in the call letter , the management took a sympathetic view and promoted the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian without requiring him to participate in the exercise of promotion as per the letter dated 14.3.1986 . Though the concerned workman accepted the promotion without reserving any right to raise any dispute , this dispute was raised after a lapse of nine years . The Petitioner Union has raised this dispute alleging that the withholding of promotion of the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian for three years when similarly situated employees have been promoted is an unjustified action by the management . Ex. W1 is the xerox copy of the letter dated 21-12-83 sentby the. Respondent/ Bank management to the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian , wherein the concerned workman was informed that he has been successful in his written test held on , 23-10-83 and as such he has become eligible for appearing at the interview and he will be advised the date , time and venue of the interview in due course . It is admitted that the concerned workman appeared for the test for promotion in response to call letter dated 12-10-83 . The xerox 2949

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

itself without reserving any right to question any alleged withholding. In the xerox copy of the 14.3.86 communication under Ex.M6 , the concerned workman has made an endorsement in his own hand stating that he accepts the offer and he is prepared to abide the conditions mentioned therein . It is not the case of the Petitioner Union that the concerned workman has accepted the promotion under Ex.M6 by reserving any right for questioning that promotion as a belated promotion and by reserving his right to demand a promotion from an earlier date . It is seen from records that the concerned workman was advised of his eligibility for interview under Ex . WI letter dated 21-12-83 but he was actually promoted under the letter advice dated 14-3-1986 under Ex. W3 . It is also Ex.M6 . While accepting that promotion under Ex . M6 the concerned workman luas not stated anything in writing to the Respondent/Management that he reserves his right to question the delay in giving promotion or considered him as an action of the Respondent/Management of withholding his promotion . It is further contended by the learned counsel for the Respondent/Managenient that the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian had accepted the promotion without raising any objection with the date of promotion and without asking for promotion from any date anterior in point of time and without calling it as withholding of promotion for three years and therefore, there is no withholding of promotion atall . He would further contend that the Union has raised this dispute by letter dated 31-12-1994 under Ex.M4 to Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) and the management has filed their reply under Ex .MS . Though it is alleged in the Clain: Statement by the Petitioner Union that the concerned workman has made several representations after interview on 4-4-1984, no such representation is filed before this Court to prove it . The concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian had not made any representation for having understood that his appearancerance in the test was void and yet the management out of sympathy gave him the promotion . This contention of the learned counsel for Respondent/Management is acceptable as valid on the basis of the materials available in this case .

6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner Union would contendthat inEx.M1 the bank management has imposed a condition stating that since the workman has claimed eligibility for the promotion exercise on having passed foundation course , he was allowed to appear for the written test on 23-10-1983 subject to verification as to whetter the said course was equivalent to matriculation/SSC and recognition of the same by the Govt. as of 15-9-1983 and this condition in any event is not applicable to the workman. It relates to passed pre -foundation course equivalent to X standard/SSLC or failed foundation course which in effect is equivalent to same X standard/ SSLC . But the workman concerned has passed 2nd year foundation course of which the condition does not speak and the concerned workman has clarified the same by producing Ex. W4 to that effect

that the first and second year of foundation course examination is equivalent to XI and XII standard examinations . He would further contend that according to Ex.M3 bank policy for promotion to clerical cadre , the required qualification for promotion from sub - staff cadre to clerical cadre is a pass in SSC /Matriculation or equivalent exantination and as per the eligibility mentioned under Ex.M3 it does not in any event or in regard to any qualificatión said that such qualification shouldbe recognised by the Govt . This contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner Union cannot be accepted as correct because when the call letter under Ex. M1 containing the condition therein was issued to the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian , he has not appeared for the written test stating that he is appearing for the test subject to his objection to the said condition about his foundation course has been recognised by the Govi, It is not disputed that. the Respondent/Bank is a nationalised bank . It is under the control ofthe Govt. It is not a private bank . Ex M2 G.O.. issuedby the Govt . of Tamil Nadu in reply to the letters of request made hythe Registrar , Madurai Kamaraj University, Registrar, University of Madras , the Director of School Education and the Secretary , Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission respectively. In this G.O. it is stated that the Government of Tamil Nadu after careful consideration direct thatpre-foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University Open University be recognised as equivalent to the X years SSLC of the Tamil Nadu Govt . for purpose of entry into public services in the State. The Govt . also direct that the two years foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University Open Universitybe recognised as equivalent to Higher Secondary Course of Tamil Nadu Govt . for purpose of entry into public services in this State . This G.O. has been issued on 18.5.85 only in reply to the letter of request of the Registrar of Madurai Kamaraj University dated 3-3-81 for recognition of the Govt. , the Govt . was pleased to recognise the same as equivalent to pre- university course / 12 year Higher Secondary Examination for the purpose of employment in public services in this State. So from this it is evidently clear that the Madurai Kamaraj University itself has requested the Tamil Nadu Govt. for recognition ofthat course as requested . So , under such circumstances , the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner Union that such qualification as foundation course of the Madurai Kamaraj University- Open University does not require any recognition by the Govt . to treat this as equivalent to X1 and XII standards . The Respondent/Bank management has given promotion to the concerned workman in the clerical cadre subsequent to the G.O. issued under Ex.M2 . Since the concerned workman'squalification of 2nd year foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University has been recognised by the Govt. itself as equivalent to X1 and XII standard examination, the concemed workman hias been immediately givenpromotion to clerical cadre, till such time , though he has passed the written test , he was not given promotion in 2950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

as vindictive action of the Respondent/Management against the concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian in withholding his promotion when similarly situated employees have been promoted . This argument of the learned counsel for the Respondent/Management can be considered as valid and correct and it can be acceptable. Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Respondent/Bank management had acted in a prejudicial manner to the concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian in withholding his promotion for three years when similarly situated employees had been promoted. So , it can be held that the Respondent/Bank management has not committed any unjustified action in giving promotion to the concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian . Hence , the concerned workman is not entitled to the relief prayed for by the Petitioner Union in the Claim Statement . Thus , the point is answered accordingly.

view ofthe condition imposed under the call letter under Ex. MI . Therefore , it cannot be said that the condition imposed in call letter Ex . MI will not bind the concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian and he ought to have been given promotion soon after he found eligible in the written test conducted by the Respondent/ Management for the promotion to clerical cadre . As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the Respondent/ Management , the eligibility condition has to be fulfilled in order to be eligible for being considered for promotion, when qualification for appointment to a post in particular cadre are prescribed, the same has to be satisfied before a person can be considered for appointment . The person must be eligible for promotion before he can be considered for promotion . In this case, the concerned workman Sri P.Subramanian's pass was not recognised by the Govt . and so he was not eligible for promotion . This argument of the learned counsel for the Respondent/Management can be accepted as correct on the face of the facts available in this case .

8. In the result, an Award is passed holding that the concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian is not entitled for any relief. No Cost .

(Dictated to the Stenographer , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on thisday the 27th February , 2003. )

K. KARTHIKEYAN, Presiding Officer

Witness Examined :-

Oneither side :

None

Documents Exhibited :-

For the 1Party/Claimant :--

Ex. No. Date

Description

21-12-83

WI Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/ Bank to concerned workman with regard to this eligibility for interview .

25-01-86

W2 Xerox copy of the call letter from Respondent for interview of the concerned workman .

14-03-86

W3 Xerox copy of the promotion advice issued to concerned workman.

W4.

25-08-83 Original memo issued by Controller of Examinations to concerned workman.

W5 .

27-01-94 Original course certificate issued byMadurai Kamaraj Universityto Sri. P. Subramanian ,

7. It is contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner Union that it came to know only in 1994 that one Mr. Asokan withpre- foundation course was promoted to clerical cadre in 1982 and hence, it raised the dispute for promoting the workman from the date when his co - workman who were successful in the written test on 23-10-83 and hence there is no question of any delay or laches arise as averred in the additional counter filed by the Respondent . He would further contend that it is a discrimination against the workman to delay his promotion by three years . But the learned counsel for the Respondent/ Management would contendthat the said Asokan was allowed to appear in the promotion exercise of written test in the year 1982 and was promoted to clerical cadre giving date of effect from 1-4-1982 and at that time the Management was not aware that the pre- foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University was not equivalent to SSLC and so the bank did notwithhold the result in the case of Mr. Asokan and it is not the case of a similarly situated employee because the call letter for written test under Ex.MI was issued to the concerned workman Sri P. Subramanian on 12-10-83 whereas Mr. Asokan participated in the promotion exercise of the year 1982 and he did not participate along with Sri P. Subramanian and the call letters issued to those who participated in the promotion exercise in the year 1983 along with Sri P. Subramanian contained the condition that the result of the test was subject to the course being recognised by the Govt. and they are bound by it and the said condition has not been questioned by the persons who participated in the promotion exercise in the year 1983 along with Sri P. Subramanian but they have accepted it and took for in the exercise and only at the time of interview of Sri P. Subramanian the bank came to know that the said course was not recognised by Govt . of Tamil Nadu or India and hence process of promotion exercise in respect of Sri P. Subramanian was stopped. Hence , it cannot be considered 2951

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Nil

Original Application & Prospectus ofMadurai Kamaraj University for open university system .

For the II Party/Management:

Date

Ex.No.

Description

12-10-83 Xerox copy ofthe call letter issued by Respondent to Sri P. Subramanian.

18-05-85 Xerox copy of the Govt . Notification for recognition of two years foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University.

Nil

Xerox copy ofthe promotion policy adopted by Respondent to clerical cadre.

31-12-94 Xerox copy of the letter from Claimant Union to Assistant Labour commissioner ( Central ) raising Industrial Dispute. 13-06-97

Xerox copy of the reply submitted by Respondent to Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) Chennai.

14-03-86 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Bank to Sri . P. Subramanian regarding his promotion with his endorsement . नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2003

का. आ . 1104.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सादर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में लेबर कोर्ट, कोजाईकोडे, केरल स्टेट के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. ( सी ) नं. 6/96 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 07-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-41012/61/95- आई. आर. ( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th March , 2003

S.O. 1104. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ 1.D. (C) No. 6/96] of the Labour Court , Kozhikode , Kerala State now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 07-03-2003 .

[No. L-41012/ 61 /95 - IR (B - 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE , KERALA STATE

Dated , this the 28th day of January , 2003 PRESENT:

Shri E. D. Thankachan B.A. , B.L. , Presiding Officer 1. D. (C) No. 6/96

BETWEEN :-

Management The Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Palghat-678001

AND.-

Worker.

Smt . K. Devaki, D/o . Sankaran , C/o . General Secretary, D.R.C.L.U. , Edappally North , Kochi. 24 .

REPRESENTATIONS :-

Sri T. R. Rajagopal, Advocate, Palakkad .

ForManagement .

Sri C.P. Menon, General Secretary, D.R.C.L.U. , Edappally North ,

ForWorker.

Kochi . 24.

AWARD

TheGovernment of India vide Order No. L-41012/61/ 95- IR(B- 1 ) dated 22-7-1996 referred under Section 10 (1 ) (d) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , the present dispute between the Southern Railway and their worker Smt . K. Devaki for adjudication and passing an award . The issue referred is:

"Whether the action of Divisional Personnel Officer , Southern Railway, Palghat Division in terminating Smt . K. Devaki , Casual Labour, LTI No. 189 , PWI/ Koyilandy from service w.e.f. 20-3-1980 is justified or not ? If not, to what relief she is entitled ?" 2. Pursuant to the notice issued from this court , intimating the date of the posting of the case, both sides appeared and filed their respective statements . The statement ofthe worker can briefly be stated as follows :

The worker who was a casual labour under P.W. Inspector , Koyilandy from 21-6-1973 , was terminated with effect from 20-3-1980 without any notice or notice pay or resorting to recourse of any procedure . Although the worker knocked on the doors of the managements for re- engagement, her crys fell in deaf ears . It was unfortunate that the worker was not given the service card by the management during the course of her employment . Many ofthe fellow labourers , who were once terminated along with the worker herein , moved the appropriate Tribunal Court with the help of their union and got reinstatement . Award in l.D. 140/89 and 202/90 ofAlappuzha are instances . Since the worker herein was an illiterate and was not aware ofall legal remedies , she did not move the dispute resolving machinery . The worker raised the industrial dispute on the basis of a certificate issued by the Chief Permanent Way 2952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5. Based on the rival contentions placed from both sides, the points that arise for consideration are :

( 1 ) Whether the action of terminating the worker hereinwith effect from 20-3-1980 isjustified or not ?

Inspector , Koyilandy which inter -alia states that the worker wasworking against LT1 20/189 as given in the LTI Register maintained in the office . Since the primary evidence to show that the worker was working , is produced , it is for the management disprove it. It is prayed that an award may be passed in favour of the worker .

(2) The relief if any the worker is entitled to?

6. Point No. 1 :--The evidence consists of the oral testimonies of WWI and MWI and the documents Exts . WI to W3. WWI is the worker herself. It is deposed by her that she had worked under the P.W. Inspector , Koyilandy from 21-6-1973 to 20-3-1980 and that her service was terminated on 20-3-1980 , without serving any notice or giving notice pay or any compensation . According to her she is eligible for CPC Scale . She proves Ext . WI , a certificate said to have been issued from the office , Ext. W2, the copy of the application , she has sent to the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Ext . W3 , a letter issued by Divisional Personnel Officer to the Assistant Labour Commissioner . Although she would depose in the cross- examination, that the order given by the Railway at the time when she was engaged in service is under her custody, no explanation is forth- coming as to why she has not produced the same before court . According to her she was not given casual labour card inspite of the facts that she served about seven years under the Railway. The explanations offered byher for the inordinate delay to initiate the dispute is that it is because of her financial inability . Nothing is therein her evidence to hold conclusively that she had worked the required mumher of days fur getting the benefits , sought for, byher.

7. MWI is the Section Engineer attached to the P. W. Inspector , Koyilandy. According to him it cannot be said that Ext . Wi has been issued from the Koyilandy office . The witness swears that the casual labour register relating, to 1980 is not at present available in the office . Ife adds that the authoritative record for casual labourers is the Casual Labour Service Card issued to them . It is also deposed by him that the register pertaining to the casual labourers will not preserved in the office for more than 10 years . According to him , Permanent Way Inspectors and Engineers are not competent persons to issue certified copies of suchdocuments . In the examination in cross , the witness would swear that the seal seen affixed on Ext . WI isnot available at Koyilandy office . The evidence of MWI clearly reveals that the service particulars of casuallabourers canbe ascertained only from the C.L.R. Card which is issued to and retained by the casual labours .

3. In the written statement filed by the management the following contentions are raised:--It is seen from the statement ofthe worker before the conciliation officer that the alleged termination of her service occurred in the year 1980. Nevertheless , the worker approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner for conciliation only in the year 1993 . No satisfactory reason was put forth for the inordinate delay of 13 years . Hence the dispute is badly hit by limitation and is liable to be dismissed in limini . No documentary proof is there in support of the claim ofthe petitioner . A party raising an Industrial Dispute is bound to produce necessary documents in support of the claim . Mere statement that the worker was retrenched from service is not sufficient ground to raise a dispute . Even though all casual labourers are issued with Casual Labour Service Cards, the worker herein has not produced such a card which would reveal the service details, such as date of engagement , number of days worked, date of retrenchment if any, compenpssation paid etc. The resondent need not preserve any records in the case of daily rated casual labourers ..Instead of producing documents in support of the claim , the worker herein had made a strange allegation without any basis that ito Casual Lahour Card was issued to her. Casual labourers aro engaged to supplement regular Railway servant in the exigencies of work and to carry out special works and project works. There is no fixity of service for casual labourers . Their services are liable to be terminated either on completion of the work for which they were engaged or on the expiry of the sanction thereof. Their services are also stopped on account of their unauthorised absence , Such stoppag would not attract the application of the term ' retrenchment' . In the present case, even the term retrenchment has not been established . Notice or notice pay and retrenchment compensation are admissible only if the worker had completed one year continous services within the meaning of Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act . So long as it is not established , it has to be held that the service of the worker hereln was not Continuous .It is true that some retrenched casual labourers were again engaged as a result of the proceedings in I: D. 140/ 89 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal , Alleppey. But it has not been proved that there is any similarity as far as the case of the worker herein in concerned. On the other hand, the circumstances of the case in I.D.140/ 89 are on different footing when compared to the case at hand . The managements pray that accepting the contentions raised in the written statement, an award be passed against the worker.

8. The contention of the worker, it appears is that although she had worked under the P.W. Inspector, Koyilandy for about seven years as casual labourer , she was not served with a Casual Labour Card , the reason of which is unknow . If in fact she had worked for such a long span of years , it is difficult to belleve , In the absence of anything to the contrary , that she was not given such a 4. A rejoinder was filed by the worker reiterating the contentions and pleadings raised in the statement , and disputing the contentions in the written statement .

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

2953

240days in a year . Their Lordships ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court held in that case as follows:

"In our opinion the Tribunal was not right in placing the onus on the mangement without first determining on the basis of cogent evidence that the respondent hadworked for more than 240 days in the year preceding thistermination . It was the case of the claimant that he had so worked but this clain was denied by the appellant . It was then for the claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination . Filing of an affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that cannot be regarded as sufficient evidence for any Court or Tribunal to come to the conclusion that a workman had, in fact , worked for 240 days in a year . No proofof receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record of appointment or engagement for this perind was produced by the workman . On this ground alone .. the award is liable to be set aside ."

Inthe case at hand also , the required registers or any scrap of paper has been produced by the worker to convince the Court that she had worked under the management for the period claimed by her in her statement . In the absence of anything of that sort , I am unable to believe the claim made by the worker . If itbe so it cannot be said that her termination front service can be said to be unjustified. Point No. 1 is found accordingly.

9. Point No. 2 :-in the result , an award is passed holding that the action of the Divisional Personnel Officer . Southern Railway , Palakkad Division in terminating the worker herein is justified and that therefore she is not entitledto any relief.

Dictatedto the Confidential Assistant , transcribed by him, revised, corrected and passed by me on the 28th day of January , 2003 .

E. D. THANKACHAN , Presiding Officer

APPENDIX:

Witness examined on the side of the worker : --

Devaki .

WWI .

Witness examined on the side of the Management:

MWI E. Chandran .

Documents marked on the side of the Worker :---

Ext. WI . Copy of Certificate issued to the worker from the office ofManagement.

Ext. W2 . Copy of letter sent to Asst . Labour Commissionerdt . 20-8-1993 .

Ext.W3 . Copy of letter dt . 29-7-1994 sent to Asst . Labour Commissioner by the Divisional Personnel Officer .

Documents marked on the side of the Management :---- NIL.

card . It is significant to note that no reason what - so- éver isstated or alleged by the worker for not issuing a card to her. In her deposition as WWI she had stated that the order issued bythe Railway at the time when she was first engaged , is there in her custody. No explanation is forth- coming as to why she did not bring the same to light . That apart , on considering the totality of evidence in the case at band it can be seen that she has not convincingly proved that she had worked in the Railway for the required period for claiming the benefits . Ext. WI would at the most reveal that she was working as a C. L. R. women Mazdoor on 27-2-1980 . It does not say that she was working , as such, previously also Ext . W2 is a representation submitted by the worker to the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Ernakulam requesting to initiate conciliation talk . It is true that in Ext . W2 she had stated that she was working from 21-6-1973 to 20-3-1980 . But as I said already , nothing is there to substantiate such a claim . Ext . W3 is a letter addressed from the Divisional Office , Personnel Branch , Palakkad to the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Cochin . It is specifically stated in the letter that the worker has not produced any documentary evidence or proof to establish that she was engaged for a specific period from 21-6-1973 to 20-3-1980 and that the termination of her service was bad .At the time ofargument the learned counsel appearing for the worker, has submitted that eventhough the worker has filed an application requiring the managements to produce certain registers which may reveal service particulars of the worker herein , the managements have not produced the same and had not given satisfactory explanation for the non production of the same. It is pertinent to note that the management has offerred an affidavit stating that the records sought to be produced would not be preserved in the office for more than 10 years and that hence they are not available and could notbe produced. The records sought are aged more than 29 years . In the light ofthe affidavit filed , I hold that the explanaton offerred is satisfactory and that therefore the non -production of the same cannot be said to be a ground to hold an adverse inference . On the other hand I hold that since the worker has not established sufficiently , that she was working for the span of a particular period, the non - production of the documents sought for cannot be said to be a ground to believe the claim of the worker . The learned counsel appearing for the managements has drawn the attention of this court to the decision in the Range Forest Officer & Another-Appellant v. S.T. Hadimani- Respondent (2002 AISL Journal 116 ) . In that case the respondent contended that he had worked for 240 days and his service had been terminated without paying any retrenchment compensation which was disputedby the Appellant . The Labour Court in the Award upheld the plea of the respondent and said that the burden was on the management to show that there was justification in termination of the service and that the affidavit of the workman was sufficient to prove that he had worked for 2954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART 11 -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च , 2003

Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , the dispute between the North Malabar Gramin Bank, Kannur (for short the management) and their workmen for adjudication and passing an award . Five issues as follows are referred :-

का. आ. 1105.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नोर्थ मालाबार ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में लेबर कोर्ट, कोजाईकोडे, केरल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. ( सी.) नं. 18/97 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 07-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-12011/11/94- आई. आर. ( बी -1 ) ]

" 1. Whether the demand of the Union for refixation of pay taking into account stipendary training period prior to 31-8-1987 as part of service is justified ? If so , to what benefit are the workman is entitled to ?

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th March , 2003

2. Whether the demand of the Union for not postponing the date of increment of the employees on account loss of pay leave on medical ground is justified ? If so , to what relief are the workmen entitled to ?

3. Whether demand of the Union for extention of scale rate of wages of Class IV to the messengers is justified ? If so , to what relief the workmen are entitled ?

S.O. 1105. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ I.D. ( C) No. 18/97 ] of the Labour Court , Kozhikode , Kerala State now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of North Malabar Gramin Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-3-2003 .

[No. L- 12011 / 11 / 94 - IR (B. 1) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

4. Whether the demand of the Union for 20 days C.L. as per admissible to State Government Employees is justified ? If so, from which date .

ANNEXURE IN THE LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE, KERALA STATE Dated this on 30th day of January , 2003

5. Whether the demand of the Union for half pay leave on par with State Govt . Employees to the RRB Employees for the period prior to 1-9-1987 is justified ? If so , to what relief are the workmen entitled ? "

Present :

IssueNos . 3 and 5 are not pressed by the Union and therefore the remaining three issues are to be adjucated .

SHRI E.D. THANKACHAN , B.A. , B.L. , Presiding Officer, I. D. (C) No. 18/97

BETWEEN :

2. On receipt of notice from this court intimating the date of posting of the case both sides appeared and filed their respective statements . The averments in the claim statement filed by the union in brief are as follows :-

The Chairman, North Malabar Gramin Bank . Head Office , P.B. No. 59 ,

Bank Road , Cannanore - 670001 Kerala Management

AND

The General Secretary , North Malabar Gramin Bank Employees Union , T.V. 197, Labba Street , Fort Road ,

Union

Cannanore -670001 ( Kerala)

Representations :

Sri M. Asokan , Advocate Calicut ForManagement

Sri P.S. Murali , Advocate , Calicut ForUnion

AWARD

The Government of India vide Order No. L12011 / 11 /94 - IR (B1 ) dated 12-3-1997 , referred to this court under

North Malabar Gramin Bank was formed in 1976 with its Head Office at Kannur . The bank is sponsored by the Syndicate Bank . The present union is a major recognised union in the management- bank. In the year 1991 , the union placed certain demands before the management . After discussion many of the demands were settled. Therefore, the present issues are raised and referred for adjudication. Prior to 1985 all the employees appointed were treated as trainees for a period ranging from 4 to 6 months . Only after the said period was over , the workers were treated as probationers .During training period they were given a lump sum, calling it a stipend . Since 1985 , however this system has been discontinued and workers were appointed on probation and on completion of satisfactory probation they were absorbed. The work performed by the so called trainees was that of full fledged employees . Therefore , the union contended that the alleged period of training should be treated for all purposes as the date of appointment and thiswas accepted by the management in general and from 1985 onwards the appointment of trainees was 2955

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

probationer in the ..........cadre at any branch of theBank provided there are suitable vacancies .

2. Those who do not come upto our standards will not be taken into service .

discontinued. As the date of appointment as trainee is deemed to be the date on which they joined the establishment,' it is prayed that the period of stipendary training should be taken for the purpose of computing the date of appointment of the employees . Therefore the first issued is raised .

Thistraining is imparted without any obligation or commitment on the part of the Bank to provide you employment "..

From the above it is clear that at the time of offering' opportunity for training there was no intention on the part of the bank to absorb, the trainees as employees ; but the intention was to absorb only those who have successfully completed training and subject to availability of vacancies. Those training was not treated as period of regular employment. The benefits of regular employees become due only from the date of appointment as probationary staff. While issuing direction on implementation of NIT Award, the NABARD has instructed as follows :

3. The present system prevailing in the management is that in case an employee enters on leave on loss of pay with or without medical certificate his date of increment is postponed to that extent . There may be genuine cases wherein an employee , on medical ground is unable to work and he is not itt a position to prove that he is entering on leave. In such cases the management does not permit him todraw the increment on the date on which it fallen due. In other words, in such cases the increment is postponed . The union, therefore , contended that where a worker is genuinely sick and is unable to attend the work because of his illness he cannot be denied his legal rights to get the increment on the due date . At the most, the managerment can insist that the worker should prove that he was on leave because of his illness . In such case his increment shouldnot be stopped. The second issue is relating to this contention.

4. The next claim ofthe union is that the workers are entitled for 20days Casual Leave as admissible to the State Government Employees . The union prays that an award may be passed in their favour .

The following contentions are raised by the management in the written objection filed

" In some ofthe RRBs prior to 26 December, 1984, staffwere recruited and given training for periods ranging between 3-6 months during which consolidated amount by way of stipend was paid: However, the staff appointed thereafter were given regular pay scales first and then imparted training . The issue , therefore , was whether in respect of the staff in some of the RRBs who were appointed prior to26December, 1984, the training period undergone bythem should be taken into account for the purpose of calculation of the number ofyears of service. The situation mentioned above pertains to period much before the appointed date and hence such cases need not be re- opened" .

The management bank is bound by the directions/ instructions, Issued by the Government of India and NABARD, as per which the period of training prior to induction into service cannot be treated as service.

6. Pay scale , allowances etc. of the employees are computed from the date of appointment as probationary staff. An attempt of the union is to suppress the circulars. issued by the NABARD and to claim that there is disparity of service to the persons appointed prior to and after 1985 and that all should be equally treated by opening the old. cases. There is absolutely no basis for the claim made by the union .

7. The provision contained in Staff Service Regulation is as follows :-

"No pay and allowances are admissible during the period of extra ordinary leave and the period spent on such leave shall not count for increment " .

All the allegation and averments in the claim statement filed by the union are denied except those are expressly admitted. The claim made by the union have no basis at all . The North Malabar Gramin Bank is a Régional Rural Bank as por the R.R.B. Act, 1976. The bank has to function as per the guidelines issued by the Government of India , NABARD is authorised to interpret and communicate the guidelines and to supervise the activities ofthe bank . During initial stage the staffs were deputed from the sponsored bank Syndicate Bank. Later on the management bank started recruiting its own staff. It was done by adopting the practice of offering training opportunities to qualified candidates, from Kannur , Kasargode and Wynad districts, where the bank operate . On successful completion of the training, if found suitable they were absorbed in the service of the bank as probationary staff . This procedure was in practice upto 1984 and the system of recruitment oftrainees was thereafter. dispensodwith, on the basis of various guidelines issued. by the Government of India and NABARD The system, existing from 1985 is that the candidates were directly posted as probatiboaryataff. In the case ofthe persons who were selected as trainces , there ware specific condition in the appointment orders tothe following effect:-

After availing leave, on the above conditions the employees are not entitled to turn round and say that they are entitled for leave ; but not bound by the condition . This interpretation is absolutely wrong . Therefore the claim of the union in that line cannot be granted. The demand for 20 days Casual Leave as admissible in the case of State "1. On successful completion of your training youou may be offered an appointment as a

824G1/03-28 2956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] Government Employees prior to the period of 1-9-1987 is absolutely incorrect . As per Regulation No. 45 of the Staff Service Regulation an employee shall be eligible only for a casual leave in full emoluments for 12 working days in a year provided that not more than 4 days casual leave may be availed of at a time. As the Staff Service Regulations are binding on the employees, they are not entitled to claim anything more than what is stipulated in the Staff Service Regulation. The management, therefore, prays to pass an award rejecting the contentions of the union .

8. The union filed a rejoinder controverting all the contentions ofthe management and reiterating the claims made in their statement . It is further contended that as the State Governments are granting increment on due date inspite of the employees entering in loss ofpay leave or on medical leave and as the State Government Employees are getting 20 days Casual Leave the employees of the management bank also are entitled to the same and that the Staff Service Regulations are not binding on the workmen .

words , the union would demand that the stipendary training periodwhich prevailed prior to 31-8-1987 has to be taken into account in considering the services period of the employees .According to the management prior to 31-8-1987 there was a system of recruiting trainees who had to undergo training for a period ranging from 4 to 6 months and only if they have successfully completed the training and sufficient vacancy exists, they would be given appointment as probationary clerks. In other words , prior to 31-8-1987 undergoing training and successful completion of the same were condition precedents for appointment as an employee in the NMG Bank. As a result ofvarious objections and accordingly various discussions thissystem was abolished and the system now prevailing is to recruit as probationary and then sending them for training. However, the demand is that those who have undergo training prior to 26 December, 1984 should be given the benefits of the training period in calculating and fixing their pay. Para 15 in Ext . M2 specifically would mention regarding the first issue . It reads as follows :-

9. Based on the rival contentions placed from both sides the points that arise for consideration are :-

( 1 ) Whether the period of stipendary training prior to 31-8-1987 can be taken into account as part ofservice ?

(2) Whether the postponement of the date of increment of the employees on account of loss of pay leave on medical ground is justified ?

(3) Whether the workmen are entitled for 20 days Casual Leave as admissible to State Government Employees ?

(4) The relief if any the workmen are entitled to ?

" In some of the RRBs prior to 26 December, 1984, staff were recruited and given training for periods ranging between 3-6 months during which consolidated amount by way of stipend was paid. However the staff appointed thereafter were given regular pay scales first , and then imparted training. The issue , therefore, was whether in respect of the staffin some of the RRBs who were appointed prior to26December , 1984, the training period undergone bythem should be taken into account for the purpose of calculation ofthe number of years of service . The situation mentioned above pertains to period much before the appointed date and hence such cases need not be re -opened . "

It can thus be seen that the curtain with regard to this aspect has permanently been put down , by deciding that such cases need not be re - opened. It follows that there is no scope for considering the first issue . Point No. 1 is decided accordingly.

10. Point No. 1 :-No oral evidence has been adduced from either side . The management produced and marked Exts . M ! to M 14. Ext . WI and W2'were marked from the side of the union . Ext . WI is the circular issued from the Head Office of the North Malabar Gramin Bank wherein the Govemment of India Circular No. 11-3/90RRB( 1 ) dated 2-2-1991 ( which is incorporated in Ext . M8) is coinmunicated to all branch offices of the N.M.G. Banks . Ext . W2 is the NIT Award . Ext. M1 is the Staff Service Regulations to NMG Bank in which particulars regarding the leave ofthe employees are specified . Ext . M2 is a letter with regardto implementation ofNIT Award . Para 15 ofExt. M2 says regarding the training details which prevailed in the NMG Bank prior to December 26 , 1984. Ext . M3 is a letter addressed by. NABARD to the Chairmen of the R.R. Banks wherein it is stated that the system of training prior to appointment was abolished and that past cases are not to be re- opened. Ext. M 4 to M 14 are communications regarding recruiting and appointment of employees .

11. It is pertinent to note that the first demand put forward by the union which is raised as Issue No. 1 herein is that refixation of pay taking into account stipendary training period prior to 31-8-1987 should be made. In other

12. Point No. 2:-Ext. M1 is the Service Regulation ofthe bank. There can be no doubt that it is applicable to the employees of the Bank . Chapter 6 of Ext . M1 deals with leave and joining time . It says regarding various leave.. Regulation No. 40 says about five types of leave such as (a) Casual Leave ( b) Privilege Leave (C) Sick Leave (d) Extra Ordinary Leave and (e) Maternity Leave . A reading ofRegulations 40 to 54 which deals with different types of leave would go to show that in Regulation 52( 3 ) only it is stipulated that " no pay and allowances are admissible during the period of extra ordinary leave and the period spent on such leave, shall not count for increment ' ' . It can be seen that extra ordinary leave may be granted when no ordinary leave is due to an employee . The provision says that in such condition the period spent on such leave ( extra ordinary leave ) shall not count for increment . It is not stated any where in the provision that increment date will be 2957

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003 /चैत्र15 , 1925

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Ext. M4.. Training Orders issued to Madhavan dtd. 15-5-1981 by the Management-Bank . (Photo copy) .

Ext. M5 .. Orderofappointment dtd. 1-10-1981 issued to Sri Madhavan by the Management-- Bank. (Photo copy) .

Ext. M6 .. Photo copy of order dtd. 17-5-1985 issued to Sri Ravindran by the Management- Bank.

Ext.M7 .. -do- Reply letter dtd . 12-2-1985 issued by NABARD to the Chairman , of Sri Saraswathi Gramin Bank .

Ext. M8 ..

postponed on account of any other leave such as Casual Leave, privilege leave, sick leave and Maternity leave . Only in the case of extra - ordinary leave the postponing ofdate of increment is mentioned. It appears to me that this is quitejustifiable . In the result I hold that the second demand for not postponing the date of increment of the employee on account of loss of pay leave , cannot be accepted. At thisjuncture , it may be noted that loss of leave is only with regard to extra ordinary leave and not in any other categories of leave. Therefore I find no justification in the demand of the union. So I hold that the postponing the date of increment ofthe employees on account of loss of pay leave fullyjustified. Issue No. 2 is hence found against the union .

-do- Letter dtd . 22-2-1991 issued by the Ministry of Finance , Department of Economic Affairs to the Management-- Bank.

Ext. M9 .. Relieving Order dtd . 10-10-1977 issued to Sri C.M. Gopalakrishna , Junior Clerk Trainee, by the Syndicate Bank, Trikaripur .

Ext. M10 .. Confidential Report dtd . 27-9-1977 in respect ofSri C.M. Gopalakrishnan submitted by the Manager , Syndicate Bank, South Trikaripur.

Ext. M11 .. Appointment Order dtd. 12-9-1977 issued to C.M. Balakrishnan from the Management-Bank.

Ext. M12 .. Letter dtd . 2-8-1977 issued to C.M. Gopalakrishnan , Junior Clerk Trainee from Syndicate Bank South Trikaripur.

Ext.M13 ..

13. Point No. 3 :-Regulation 45 in Chapter 6 would specifically say that an officer or employee shall be eligible for casual leave on full emoluments for 12 working days in ayear provided that not more than 4 days casual leave may be availed of at any one time . From this Regulation there can be no ambiguity at all with regard to the casual leave that can be availed by the employees . May be it true that the State Government Employees are granted 20 casual leaves by the Government . As long as Ext . M1 is binding on the employees of the NMG Banks and direction can be issued only by NABARD and in the circumstances that nothing contrary to Regulation 53 of Ext. M1 is brought forth, 1 hold that the demand of the union that the employees should be granted 20 days casual leaves as in the case of State Government Employees , cannot be accepted . It follows that issue No. 3 has to be decided against the Union .

Joining report dtd. 3-6-1977 submitted by C.M. Gopalakrishnan .

Ext. M14 .. Order dtd. 3-5-1977 isued to C.M. Gopalakrishnan to undergo training at SyndicateBank.

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च , 2003 14. Point No. 4 :-In the result , an Award is passed holding that the union is not entitled to get any of the demands made in the three issues raised and adjudicated. Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by him, revised , corrected and passed by me on the 30th day of January , 2003 .

E.D. THANKACHAN , Presiding Officer

APPENDIX :

Witnesses examined on either side :-

का. आ. 1106.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या नं . 292/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । NIL .

Documents marked on the side of the Union :-

[सं. एल-40012/207/99- आई. आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th March, 2003 Ext. W1 .. Circular issued from the Head Office ofthe North Malabar Gramin Bank dt. 21-3-1991 . (Copy).

Ext. W2 .. Award of the National Industrial Tribunal dtd. 30-4-1990 .

Documents marked on the side of the Management :-

Ext.Ml .. Staff Service Regulations of North Malabar GraminBank .

S.O.1106. In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial DisputeAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 292/2001 ) of the Central. Govemment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt. ofPost and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-3-2003 .

Ext. M2 .. Photo copy ofCircular dtd. 20-3-1993 issued by the NABARD to the management Bank .

Ext. M3 .. -do- dt. 16-8-1984 -do-

[No. L-40012/207/99 - IR (DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer 2958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 5, 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] ANNEXURE

AWARD

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 19th February, 2003

Present :

The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above mentioned order of reference by the Central Govt. for adjudication by this Tribunal is as follows :-

K. KARTHIKEYAN, '

Presiding Officer,

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 292/2001

(Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 315/99 ).

"Whether the action of the management of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division in terminating the services of Shri P. Masanam S/o . Sri Perumal , ex- packer is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman isentitled?"

2. The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the 1 Party/Workman Sri P. Masanam (hereinafter refers to as Petitioner) are briefly as follows: -

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the workman Sri P. Masanam and the Management of the Superintendent of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division , Virudhunagar) .

BETWEEN :

Sri P. Masanam

IParty/Workman AND

The Sr. Superintendent : 11 Party/Management

of Post Offices ,

Virudhunagar Division,

Virudhunagar .

Appearance :

For the Workman

M/ s. S. Jothivani & R. Balagurusamy, Advocates

For the Management

Sri D. Nandakumar, ACGSC

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , have referred the concemed industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L-40012 /207/99/ IR(DU) dated 19-11-1999.

This reference has been made earlier to the Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal, Chennai , where the same was taken on file as I.D. No. 315/99. When the matter was pending enquiry in that Tribunal , Government of India, Ministry of Labour was pleased to order transfer of this case alsofrom the file of Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal to this Tribunal for adjudication . On receipt of records from that Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal , this case has been taken on file as I.D. No. 292/2001 and notices were sent to the counsel on record on either side , informing them about the transfer of this case to this Tribunal, with a direction to appear before this Tribunal 13-02-2001 with their respective parties and to prosecute this case further . Accordingly , the learned counsel on either side along with their respective parties have appeared and prosecuted this case further.

The Petitioner was working as Extra Departmental Packer at Sathur West Sub Office and he was rendering his duties to the entire satisfaction of his superiors without any blemish . The Petitioner was placed under put off du'y on 16-12-89 by a memo dated 16-12-89 by the Sub Divisional Inspector , Sivagasi . At the time of placing the Petitioner under put off duty, the Petitioner was not let known the reasons for his put off duty . The Petitioner was issued a memo dated 20-7-90 alleging that when the Petitioner was working as E. D. Packer Sathur West SO during the period from 9-9-89 to 16-9-89 acted as an unauthorised agent of Sri T. Ganesan of Satur who booked parcels at Satur West Post Office under the benami name ofS. S. Swamy , P. K. Street , Sathur and that Petitioner brought the parcels from the residence of Sri T.Ganesan to Sathur Post Office and got them booked by the Sub Postmaster, Satur West. During the above period, the Petitioner also unauthorisedly performed the duties of the sub Postmaster , Sathur Westby himself preparing the parcel list dated 13-9-89 and labels of parcel bag dated 9-9-89, 12-9-89 , 13-9-89 and 16-9-89 and himselfclosing the direct parcel bags dated 9-9-89 , 12-9-89 , 13-9-89 and 16-9-89 destined to Calcutta GPO in the presence of the Sub Postmaster . The parcels enclosed in the above direct parcel bags were detected to have borne deficit of postage at the office of destination i.e. Calcutta GPO on opening of the parcel . bags and thus , the Petitioner is also responsible for the shortage of stamps in those parcels . by his unauthorised performance of duties and charged the Petitioner with having overstepped his official duties by unauthorisedly acting as an agent of a benami person and by unauthorisedly performing the duties of the Sub Postmaster , Sathur West and thereby failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty as required by Rule 17 of P & T E. D. Agents (Conduct & Service ) Rules, 1964. The Petitioner denied the charges in his letter dated 30-7-90 . The Sub Divisional Inspector ( P) Sivagasi Sub Division appointed Sri N.Veluchami , Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Sub Division asEnquiry Officer by memo dated 22-8-90 and appointed Upon perusing the Claim statement, Counter Statement, the documentary evidence let in on either side , the other material papers on record, and this matter having stood over till this date for consideration, this Tribunal has passed on merits , the following:-

2959

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3. The averments in the Counter Statement filed by the II Party /Management Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Virudhunagar (hereinafter refers to as Respondent) are briefly as follows:-

The Petitioner as E.D. Packer is required to give assistance to the Sub Postmaster only. But the Petitioner has taken the Sub Postmaster's duties and misused the department articles without Sub Postmaster's permission and he directly sent the bags to Calcutta GPO . Then after received the said bags by destination Post Office at Calcutta they foundunderpaid and immediately informed the Respondent Postal Authority. On receipt of message from the GPO, the Respondent Postal Authority immediately taken action against the Petitioner and removed him from service . The Petitioner admitted before the Sub. Postmaster that he misused the department articles without the knowledge of Sub Postmaster. The Petitioner preferred an appeal against the order of dismissal before the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division , who after careful scrutiny of the appeal of the Petitioner, rejected the same confirming the punishment awarded to him . Then the Petitioner filed a review petition before the Director of Postal Services , Southern Region, Madurai and the same was also rejected by the Revisional Authority.The Petitioner has admitted that having preparedthe parcel list himself and tag labels ofparcel bags . The rules on the subject do not permit the Petitioner to performtheduties of Sub Postmaster. Though the ED Agent can render assistance that assistance cannot render itself be an act of performing the actual duties of a full fledged departmental official whose responsibilities are totally different. Thus, the Petitioner had access to handle the parcels right from the stage they were booked till despatched. In fact, the Petitioner is the person who closed the parcel bags . The Petitioner himself admits that Sub Postmaster was a senior TBOP official and generally such officials would not commit such act ofpilferage as the one for which the Petitioner stands charges . The charges was proved beyond doubt in the report ofthe Enquiry Officer as a result of evidence adduced in the enquiry.The Petitioner was awarded with the punishment of removal from service and the Appellate Authority upheld thepenalty imposed on the Petitioner. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dismiss the petitionwith cost.

4.When the matter was taken up for enquiry finally, no one has been examined as a witness on either side . With the consent of the learned counsel on either side , documents filed on either side have been marked as Ex . Wl to W3 and Ml and M5 respectively. In spite of the matter has been adjourned to various dates for the counsel on . either side to advance their respective arguments , they have not chosen to advance their respective arguments . Hence , orders were reserved to decide the matter on merits , with the available materials and records .

Sri M.Sivanpillai , Sub Divisional Inspector ( P) Aruppukottai Sub Division as Presenting Officer . The Petitioner in the first instance nominated Sri Pandiyan , Assistant Postmaster , Madurai , HO as defence assistant, subsequently he nominated Sri Ramachandran, retired Postal Assistant as his defence assistant and the same waspermitted by Enquiry Officer. During the enquiry , some of the documents mentioned in the annexure to the Memo of charges were not produced in original and xerox copies of the same were produced . The Petitioner called for additional documents to prove his innocence. But, eventhough some- of the documents were produced, some ofthe documents were not produced on the reason that they are not available. In view of the denial of access to the documents called for by him , the Petitioner was denied a reasonable opportunity to defend his case which is in violationofprinciples of naturaljustice . The report ofthe Enquiry Officer was given to the Petitioner and he was asked to submit his defence within 15 days . The Petitioner also submitted his representation on the Enquiry Officer's report on 20-8-91 . The Sub Divisional Inspector ( P) Sivagasi issued an order dated 19-9-91 to the Petitioner for removing him from the service . The Petitioner preferred an appeal to the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division and the same was rejected by him and the punishment of removal of the Petitioner from service was confirmed . The Petitioner preferred a review petition to the Director of Postal Services , Madurai for which the Petitioner has not received any reply so far . The Petitioner has only assisted the Sub Postmaster in her duties without any extra remuneration and just to help her superior and to carry out the direction of his superiors . He only rendered additional duties apart from his normal duties , since the duties earmarked for the Petitioner as an E.D. Packer was that exchange of mails , clearance of LBs only and the preparation of parcel list and tag labels are not the duties of the Petitioner . Moreover , the parcel list was authenticated by Sub Postmaster herself and even tag labels were available with the names of destinations printed on them . The Petitioner is not responsible for the performance of the duties as alleged in the charge memo . The Sub Divisional Inspector (P) Sivagasi Sub Division had exceeded his jurisdiction in deciding the case and imposed the major punishment of removal from service which is an illegal , arbitrary and colourable exercise of the power without any jurisdiction. Therefore , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award holding the removal of the Petitioner from service by Sub Divisional Inspector (P) Sivagasi Sub Division as null and void and direct the Respondent/Management to reinstate the Petitioner in service as E. D. Packer at Sathur West Sub Office with all concomitant and monetary benefits .

2964)

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5. The Point for my consideration is-

"Whether the action of the management of PostOffices , Virudhunagar Division in terminating the services of Shri P. Masanam

S/o. Sri Perumal, ex -packer is legal andjustified?

If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

Point:-

The xerox copy ofthat covering letter is Ex. W2. Ex . W3 is the xerox copy of the defence brief submitted by the Petitioner to the Enquiry Officer. Ex. M3 is the xerox copy ofthe proceedings of Sub Divisional Inspector, Postal, Sivakasi Sub Division for the removal of the Petitioner from service. Ex. M4 is the xerox copy of the proceedings of the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division, Virudhunagar , for rejecting the appeal preferred by the Petitioner against the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority for removing him from service . Ex . M5 is the xerox copy of the order passed by the Post Master General , Southern Region , Madurai dated 1-10-93 rejecting the revision filed by the Petitioner, after This industrial dispute has been raised by the I Party/ Workman Sri P. Masanam challenging the action of the management of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division in teri ninating his services as Ex - Packer as unjustified. It is adinitted that the Petitioner was working as Extra Departmental Packer at Sattur West SO from 9-9-89. He was placed under put off duty on 16-12-89 by the Sub Divisional Inspector , Sivakasi for an alleged misconduct of misused the department articles without Sub Postmaster's permission by taking the duties of Sub Postmaster and directly sent the bags to Calcutta GPO as under- paid . Ex. Ml is the xerox copy of a communication diated 25-9-89 sent by Calcutta GPO to the Postmaster, Sattur West, wherein it is stated that five parcel bags Have been received with shortage of postage of Rs.60 /- , H.s.16/- , Rs.60/- , Rs.40/- and Rs.40/-respectively and the due to be recoverable from the addressee . Ex.M2 is the xerox copy of the charge sheet dated 20-7-90 issued to the Petitioner alleging that the Petitioner while working 1is E.D. Packer , Sattur West SO during the period from 19-9-89 to 16-9-89 acted as an unauthorised agent of Sri T. Ganesan who booked parcels at Sattur West Post Office under the benami name of S.S.Swamy and that the Petitioner brought the parcels from the residence of T. Ganesan to Sattur West Post Office and got them booked by the Sub Postmaster , Sattur West by unauthorisedly performing the duties of Sub Postmaster, Sattur Westby himself for preparing the parcel list dated 13-9-89 and tag labels for parcel bags dated 9-9-89 , 12-9-89, 13-9-89 and 16-9-89 and that he himself closed the direct parcel bags destined to Calcutta GPO which were detected to have borne deficiency of postage by the office of the destination i.e. Calcutta GPO and thus the Petitioner is responsible for the shortage of stamps in those parcels by his unauthorised performance of duties and thereby he failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty as required by Rule 17 of P & TE.D. Agents(Conduct & Service) Rules, 1964. In pursuance of the charge memo under Ex . Ml issued to the Petitioner , a domestic enquiry was conducted. Ex. WI series are the daily order sheet maintained by the Enquiry Officer . On conclusion of the enquiry , the Enquiry Officer has submitted his report dated 31-7-91 . The xerox copy ofthat report is Ex . W2 . The same was forwarded to the Petitioner with a covering letter dated 6-8-91 with a direction to submit his representation for the Enquiry Officer's report .

his appeal has been rejected by the Appellate Authority. 6. It is the contention of the Petitioner that he only assisted the Sub Postmaster in her duties with a view to help his superior and to carry out the direction of the superior , he had rendered additional duties apart from his normal duties and that the parcel list was authenticated by Sub Postmaster herself and even tag labels were available with the names of destinations printed in them and that even though he is not responsible for performance of the duties as alleged in the charge memo . TheDisciplinary Authority has removed him from service as though he is responsible for the deficiency of postage stamp. It is further alleged that imposing of major punishment of removal from service is illegal and arbitrary. It is not the case of the Petitioner that the enquiry conducted by the Respondent department for the charge memo issued to the Petitioner is vitiated or not proper . He has not questioned the validity of domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondent/Department. Ex . W1 the daily order sheets maintained by the Enquiry Officer for the enquiry conducted clearly shows that the Petitioner as charge sheeted employee has taken part all through the enquiry along with his defence representative and has cross examined the witnesses in detail . It is also not his case that the Enquiry Officer has given his finding in his report that the Petitioner is guilty of the charges mentioned in the charge memo without any basis or evidence . On the other hand, the perusal of Ex . W2 the report of the Enquiry Officer clearly shows that after analysing the oral evidence of six witnesses as well as documentary evidence 14 in Nos . filed by the management, the Enquiry Officer after giving reasons for accepting the evidence and for coming to the conclusion has given his finding that the articles of charge framed against the Petitioner is proved beyond doubt. It is seen from the Enquiry Officer's report that the delinquent employee the Petitioner herein , himself has admitted in the enquiry, the facts mentioned in the statements he has given before the A.S.P. Virudhunagar Division and Sub Divisional Inspector Sivakasi Sub Division , those statements have 2961

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

power under section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act . Hence , it can be concluded that the action of the management of Post Offices , Virudhunagar Division in terminating the services of Sri P. Masanam Ex -Packer is legal and justified . So , the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief. Thus , the point is answered accordingly. :

7. In the result, an Award is passed holding that the I Party/Workman Sri P.Masanam is not entitled for any relief. No Cost.

(Dictated to the Stenographer , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 19th February.2003.)

K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer

:None

Witnesses Examined: -

Oneither side

Documents Exhibited: -

For the 1 Party/Workman: -

Description

Ex.No. Date

WI Series (13) 19.03.91 to

06.08.91

Xerox copy of the daily order sheet maintained during enquiry proceedings . }

W231.07.91

Xeroxcopy ofthe report ofthe Enquiry Officer with covering Letter

W3 00.07.91

Xerox copy ofthe Letter from Petitioner to Enquiry Officer

For the II Party/Management: -

Description

Ex. No. Date

MI 25.09.89

Xerox copy ofthe Letter from Calcutta GPO to Satur Post

Master regarding shortage of postage

M220.07.90

Xerox copy of the charge sheet issued to Petitioner

M3 19.09.91

Xerox copy ofthe order ofSub Divisional Inspector

Sivakasi , removing the Petitioner from service .

M4 10.04.92

Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority

M5 01.10.93

Xerox copy of the order of the Postmaster General , Madurai .

PresidingOfficer been marked as management exhibits No. 27 and 28. It is also his admission before the Enquiry Officer that he had pasted the postage stamp to the parcels and have noted the weight of the parcel on the cloth of each parcel . But he could add that he has done so at the request of the Sub Postmaster . The Sub Postmaster who has been examined as MW3 had deposed before the Enquiry Officer that the Petitioner himself has weighed the parcels , noted the weight on the wrapper, purchased. postage stamps and pasted them on the parcels and that has not been disputedby the Petitioner . It is proved by satisfactory evidence before Enquiry Officer that the Petitioner has acted as an unauthorised agent of the sender of the parcels and the Petitioner is responsible for the shortage of postage stamps on those parcels and he had overstepped his official duties by unauthorisedly performing the duties of Sub Postmaster and thereby he had violated the provisions of Rule 17 of P & TE.D. Agents (Conduct & Service ) Rules , 1964. So , under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Enquiry Officer has given a perverse finding without any legal evidence . The evidence let in before the Enquiry Officer as seen from the Enquiry Officer's daily order sheet shows that the Petitioner had access to handle the parcels right from the stage they were booked till despatched and he is the person who closed the parcel bags . He has also admitted that the Sub Postmaster , a senior TBOP official could not commit such act of pilferage . For the proved misconduct of the Petitioner as an E. D. Agent, the Disciplinary Authority has awarded the punishment of removing him from service , which cannot be said to be a disproportionate punishment for the proved misconduct of the Petitioner, which is very serious in nature . As contended by the Respondent/Management , the Petitioner by his proved misconduct has failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty as required by Rule 17 of P & T E.D. Agents (Conduct & Service ) Rules , 1964. As pointed out by the Disciplinary Authority in Ex ..M3 order , the Petitioner has tarnished the image of the department and the acts of Petitioner warrants deterrent action and the Petitioner is not a fit person to be retained in the department. This decision of the Disciplinary Authority was accepted by the Appellate Authority as well as Revisional Authority . So under such circumstances , there is no reason to interfere with the findings of the Enquiry Officer by this Tribunal . Further, for the proved serious misconduct of the Petitioner as an E.D. Packer , the Disciplinary Authority has awarded him a punishment which is not disproportionate to the act of proved misconduct of the Petitioner . Hence , this Tribunal cannot interfere with the punishment of removal from service awarded by the Disciplinary Authority for the Petitioner for his proved misconduct by exercising its discretionary 2962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5, 2003/CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च , 2003

N.C.C. Directorate Canteen

(TN & P & AN) .

Chennai .

APPEARANCE

Forthe Workman : M/s . S. Ayyathurai , Advocates

FortheManagement Sri T. Ravikumar , ASGC .

का. आ. 1107.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एन ० सी ० सी० डायरेक्टोरेट कैण्टीन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 568/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-03-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -14011/54/2000- आई. आर. ( डी०यू० ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (14 of 1947), have referred the concerned industrial dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L - 14011 /54/2000/ IR(DU) dated 26-03-2001 .

New Delhi , the 11th March , 2003

S.O. 1107.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 568/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of N.C.C. Directorate Canteen and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-03-2003 .

On receipt of the order of reference from the Government of India, Ministry of Labour , this case has beentaken on file as I. D. No. 568/2001 and notices were sent to the parties to the dispute by registered post, with a direction to appear before this Tribunal on 02-05-2001 to file their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement and to prosecute this case further . Accordingly, learned counsel on record on either side have filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement and prosecuted this case further .

[No. L- 14011/54/2000- IR(D.U .) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Upon perusing the Claim Statement , Counter Statement, reply statement filed by I Party /Workman , oral and documentary evidence let in on either side, the other material papers on record, after hearing the arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side and this matter having stood over till this date for consideration , this Tribunal has passed the following :-

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

AWARD

Tuesday the 4th March , 2003

Present:

The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above mentioned order of reference by the Central Govt . for adjudication by this Tribunal is as follows :-

K. KARTHIKEYAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 568/2001

"Whether the claim of Sh . M. Rajkumar for reinstatement with continuity of services with back wages from the management of N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) , Chennai is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Workman Sri M. Rajkumar and the Management of Canteen Officer , N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN )]

BETWEEN

2. The averments in the Claim Statement filed by theI Party/Workman Sri M. Rajkumar (hereinafter refers to as Petitioner ) are briefly as follows :-

SriM. Rajkumar : I Party/Workman

AND

The Petitionerjoined the II Party /N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) at Chennai as a helper on 8-12-95 . He was paid monthly salary of Rs . 1200. He was discharging his duties diligently to the satisfaction of The Canteen Officer : II Party /Management 2963

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

employment and he has no other source of income . The allegations levelled against him are false and the falsity ofthe allegations can be seen from the fact that no further proceedings have been initiated after the receipt of his explanation . The Petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any misconduct . He has not been paid his wages so far, which comes to Rs . 13,200/-from August , 1999 to 30-06-2000 . No charge memo was issued and no enquiry was held . Whenever he was called he went to office , he was not allowed inside and he had to return simply. Since the Respondent could not prove the charges levelled against the Petitioner , the Respondent did not conduct any enquiry . The Respondent is not justified in not furnishing the Tamil version of the correspondence with the Petitioner . The Petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any misconduct and has not avoided any enquiry. His alleged unauthorised absence was due to his stomach ailment of which he informed the Manager . His absence was not unauthorised. Hisservices were terminated by the Respondent in violation ofprinciples of natural justice and in violation of provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act. The Petitioner has been suffering without employment and his efforts to get employment elsewhere were of no avail . Hence, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award holding that the non- employment of the Petitioner brought about by the Respondent/Management is not justified and directing the Respondent/Manageinent to reinstate the Petitioner with continuity of service and back wages and attendant benefits and award costs .

3. The averments in the Counter Statement filed by the II Party/ Canteen Officer , N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) are briefly as follows :-

None of the averment made in the Claim Statement filed by the Petitioner is admitted except those that are specifically admitted. The proper forum for the Petitioner to raise the claim would be to file a petition under Tamil Nadu Shops & Establishments Act . The Canteen ofN.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) is a private undertaking of the N.C.C. Directorate which is run through non Governmental funds i.e. to say that the funds of Central Govt are not used and the persons employed inthe Canteen are under the terms & conditions which are mutually agreed and settled between the Canteen Management and servants and therefore , their service conditions are not par with the Govt . establishment and the private canteen is not an industry . This position has been clarified by the Government of India , Ministry of Defence's letter dated 27-10-77 . The canteen is funding only to cater for few service and ex- servicemen of the armed forces . It is run out of private funds not charging to the consolidating funds of the Union Government . The canteen enjoys certain concessions extended to it like hissuperiors . On 18-8-99 while the Petitioner was on duty, he developed stomach pain and around 4.00 pm he left for home after getting permission from the Manager Mr. Thirugnanasambandham . As his stomach problem continued to diarrhoea , the Petitioner took leave by informing the Manager about his condition over phone. After recovery from his illness , he reported for work on 22-8-99 . The Manager told him that the Canteen Officer wanted to see him . When the Petitioner met the Canteen Officer, he asked him about his stomach problem . The Petitioner told him that he informed the Manager over phone about his stomach problem . The Canteen Officer told him to produce a medical certificate . On 24-8-99 the Petitioner produced a medical certificate from the Doctor , who treated him . But the Canteen Officer , threw it him saying that he was not prepared to believe the certificate and told him not to report for work . The Petitioner went to office several times and requested the Canteen Officer to permit him to work . But he rejected his request . Therefore , he sent a letter dated 1-12-99 to the Canteen Officer requesting for permission to report for work . There- after , the Petitioner received a show cause notice dated 15-12-99 levelling certain charges and asking him to submit his explanation. Since the show cause notice containing charges in English , the Petitioner sent a letter on 20-12-99 to the II Party /N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) Manager requesting him to provide him with Tamil version of the charges levelled against him. The Petitioner received a letter dated 23-12-99 directing him to come to office to collect Tamil version of show cause notice . On 3-1-2000 when he went to office and he was given two papers , one in English and the another in Tamil and he was asked to sign when the Petitioner told him that he would sign it after going through the same , he took back the papers and told him to go and therefore , he came back . Thereafter the Petitioner received English and Tamil version of show cause notice dated 4-1-2000 to which he submitted his explanation on 6-1-2000 . Thereafter , the Petitioner sent a letter dated 16-2-2000 requesting for permission to report for work . But the Petitioner received a letter dated 7-3-2000 along with a show cause notice dated 10-9-99 levelling certain allegations and asking for his explanation on 21-3-2000 . The Petitioner submitted his explanation and requested for reinstatement . So far he has not received any reply . Therefore , he approached the Hon'ble High Court of Madras for relief and the High Court has rejected his request on the ground that he could seek relief before the forum under Industrial Disputes Act . Accordingly , the Petitfoner filed a petition before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ), Chennai raising a dispute relating to his non- employment . The Respondent filed Counter Statement. As the conciliation officer could not bring about a settlement , he sent failure of conciliation report to Govt . , whereupon the Govt. have referred the issue for adjudication to this Hon'ble Court . The Petitioner has been suffering without

824 G1/03-29 2964

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Disputes Act. Hence , it is prayed that the Respondent may be directed to reinstate the Petitioner in service with continuity of service , back wages and all other attendant benefits .

5. When the matter was taken up for enquiry finally, theI Party/Petitioner has examined himself as WW1 and ten documents have been marked as Ex . Wl to W10 on the sideofthe I Party/Workman. On the side of the II Party/ Management a common witness for I.D. Nos . 568 & 569/2001 as MWI has been examined and five documents have been marked as Ex. Ml to M5 . Arguments advanced bythe learned counsel on either side were heard .

6.The point for my consideration is :--

"Whether the claim of Shri M.Rajkumar for reinstatement with continuity of services with back wages from the management of N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN), Chennai is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled?"

Point:-

salestax, Excise Duty which are not collected by Govt . and theprofitmade are utilised for cadets welfare, war widows, ex - servicemen welfare etc. This stand has been brought out in the rejoinder filed before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Chennai for reconciliation . The averments of the Petitioner that he is a permanent worker under the terms of Section 3 ( 1 ) ofTamil Nadu Industrial Establishment & Confirmatory ofPermanent Status of Workmen Act, 1981 is not correct, since only 9workmen are employed on any day preceding ofthe 12 months as laid down under Section 1 (3 ) and as such the present case has no relevance to Section 2 (00) 2(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is not attracted. While stock taking was done during July, 1999, it revealed that there were deficiency/discrepancies amounting to Rs . 80,409/ - and accountability vested withNCC in- charge, billers , helpers issuing the stores and allthe persons were shifted to anotherjob and the Petitioner absented himself from work . The Petitioner did not turn up for investigation conducted . A notice was issued to Petitioner's home address asking him to attend the investigation . The said letter was returned by the postal department with an endorsement ' refused' . The Petitioner was not proper and sincere in his work and he was warned twice for dereliction of duties and on disciplinary grounds . Furthermore, the Petitioner abandoned the work and left . No injustice has been caused to the Petitioner and as such , the claim is liable to be rejected . Hence, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dismiss this industrial dispute with cost .

4. The averments in the reply statement filed by the Petitioner are briefly as follows:-

ThePetitioner/Workman Sri M. Rajkumar has been engaged as a helper in the Canteen of Respondent/ Management of N. C. C. Directorate (TN & P & AN ) Chennai . It is the plea and evidence of the Petitioner as WW1 that he joined the services of the Respondent Canteen as a helper on 8-12-1995 . It is not denied either in the Counter Statement or in the evidence of MW 1 . A suggestion has been put to WW1 in the cross examination that no appointment order was given to the Petitioner by the Respondent N. C. C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) to join in the post of helper in the Canteen on 8-12-95. It is admitted by the Petitioner . Anyhow, it is mentioned in Ex. M4 that the Petitioner has been given an appointment in writing and that the Petitioner is in agreement with terms and conditions and signed for the same while taking initial employment . Butneither of the parties has chosen to file that documents into Court to ascertain the nature of the employment of the Petitioner in the Respondent/N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) as a helper . But in his plea and the evidence that when he joined the service in the canteen in December , 1995 his salary was Rs . 600/- per month and his last drawn salary was Rs.1200/- p.m. and that in August, 1999 when he reported for duty with the medical certificate , the Canteen Officer told him orally that he need not come for work . This has not been denied by the Respondent/Management either in the Counter Statement or in the evidence given by MW1 . In the cross examination MW1 says that he does not know whether the Respondent/ Management alone has orally terminated the services of the Petitioner and the management has not permitted the Petitioner to report for 2965 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

duty. It is the specific plea of the Petitioner both in his Claim Statement as well as in his evidence that on 18-8-99 when he was on duty he developed stomach problem and hence , he left for home around 4.00 pm after getting permission from the Manager and after recovery from his illness , when he reported for duty , the Canteen Manager asked him to go and meet the Canteen Officer and when the Petitioner met the Canteen Officer , he asked the Petitioner to produce medical certificate in proof ofhis illness and on 24-8-99 when he produced the medical certificate to the Canteen Officer , the Canteen Officer after seeing the medical certificate threw it away stating that he was not prepared to believe it and told him orally not to come for work . This specific plea and evidence of the Petitioner has not been denied by the Respondent in the Counter Statement and in the oral evidence given by MWI . It is the evidence of the Petitioner as WWI that after he was informed by the Canteen Officer that no work can be given to him and not to come to Canteen for work, he sent a letter dated 1-12-99 to the Canteen Officer requesting him to permit him to work in the canteen and the carbon copy of the typed letter dated 1-12-99 is Ex . W7 and the postal acknowledgement of the Canteen Officer for receiving the letter Ex . W7 is Ex. W8 . In Ex . W 7 itself, the Petitioner has stated about the illness he has developed in the evening of 18-8-99 and left for home after informing the Canteen Manager and when he returned for work on 23-8-99 he was asked to produce nedical certificate and when he produced the medical certificate on 24-8-99 after seeing the same, the Canteen Officer has threw it away and had informed him orally not to come for work . So from this it is seen that what he has stated in his petition as well as in his evidence are not the averments made by him as an afterthought for the purpose of this case . But he has stated the same even in his letter dated 1-12-99 under Ex . W7 . Nothing has been elicited in the cross examination of WWI stating that the Respondent Canteen Officer has not received one such letter , the original of Ex. W7 under the postal acknowledgement of Ex . W8 . The MWI has also not stated in his Chief Examination that the then Canteen Officer has not received the original of Ex . W7 under the postal acknowledgement ofEx .W8 . So it cannot be said that the Petitioner remained absent for duty from the evening of 18-8-99 without any valid reason and without informing the Respondent/ Management .

to him informing him to come to the office on 3rd January , 2000 to obtain the Tamil version of letter under Ex . W1 . That letter dated 23-12-99 he received from the Canteen Officer is Ex . W3 . It is his further evidence that he went to office on 3-1-2000 and the Canteen Officer asked him to sign few papers in which something were written in Tamil and when he told him that he can sign the papers after going through the same , the Canteen Officer refused for the same and asked him to go , so he returned the papers without signing the same and that on 5-1-2000 , he received a letter dated 4-1-2000 in English enclosing a Tamil version of the show cause notice under Ex . W1 . That letter is Ex. W4. He has sent a reply dated 6-1-2000 to the Canteen Officer and the xerox copy of the same is Ex . W9 . It is also his evidence that as he has not received any reply for his letter under Ex . W9 he sent another letter dated 16-2-2000 to the Canteen Officer and the carbon copy of that letter dated 16-2-2000 is Ex . WI0 . It is also his evidence that again the Canteen Officer sent a letter dated 7-3-2000 enclosing a Tamil version of a letter dated 10-9-99 , the same is Ex . W5 and he has sent a reply dated 21-3-2000 for the same and the carbon copy of that letter dated 21-3-2000 is Ex . W6 . It is his further evidence that subsequent to that he had not receivedd not received any communication from the Canteen Officer , informing him to report for work and no enquiry was conducted for the show cause notice dated 10-9-99 . This evidence of WW1 is in accordance with the averment he has made in his Claim Statement . It is hisadmission in the cross examination that he had not given any leave letter for the days he had not reported for duty from 18-8-99 to 22-8-99. He has further admitted that he was given a warning letter on 31-7-99 for coming late for work and his absence for work and for the show cause notice dated 24-8-99 he received at his house address , he has not given any reply and another show cause notice dated 10-9-99 was sent to his house address and the xerox copy of the same is Ex . M3 . He would further admit that the show cause notice dated 13-10-99 is about an act of misappropriation and Ex . M4 is the xerox copy of the letter sent by the Respondent/Management to expedite his reply for the show cause notice . He would further admitthat Ex . M5 is the xerox copy of the show cause notice dated 15-12-99 issued by the Canteen Officer to him by post. In the re - examination he has stated that even though he was given a letter dated 31-7-99 under Ex . MI , and the show cause notice under Ex . M2 , he did not know the contents of those two documents since they were in English and he came to know the contents of those documents only through his advocate . In Ex . M2 it is clearly mentioned that the presence of the Petitioner is essential during the period 19-8-99 to 21-8-99 and in spite ofthe fact he was informed previously that he had wilfully absented himself without prior permission and the Petitioner was asked to explain as to why his services should not be terminated on disciplinary grounds for his unauthorised absence for duty. All the things have not been disputed by 7. It is admittedby WW1 , the Petitioner that he received a letter dated 15-12-99 by registered post and it is Ex . Wl . It is his further evidence that since that letter is in English he sent a letter dated 20-12-99 to the Canteen Officer requesting him to send the Tamil version of the letter dated 15-12-99 . The carbon copy of the typed letter dated 20-12-99 is Ex .W2 . It is also his evidence that in response to his letter under Ex. W2 , a letter dated 23-12-99 was sent 2966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL. 5, 2003 / CHAITRA 15, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

That appointment order copy has not been filed by the Respondent/Management to show that he was engaged only as a Casual Labourer . It is seen from the material available in this case , that the Petitioner has been engaged asa helper in the Respondent/N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) from December, 1995 to August , 1999. As contended by the Petitioner , the Respondent/Management has not conducted any enquiry subsequent to the submission of reply by the Petitioner to the show cause notice and no reply has been given by the management to the Petitioner . As mentioned in Ex . M5 / W1 , the Respondent/Management has not given the Petitioner in writing that his services are no more required . It is the contention of the Respondent/ Management that the Petitioner has only stopped coming for work and the Respondent/Management has not terminated the Petitioner from service even orally . But it is the contention of the Petitioner that even though he has reported for duty after the recovery from his illness and produced medical certificate, the Canteen Officer has only not permitted him to join duty . MW1 has not denied it as false . But he has given evidence to that effect that the Petitioner has not turned up for work voluntarily and they have left the work on their fearing of enquiry on the basis of show cause notice issued to them and they have not been terminated from service by the N.C.C. Directorate Canteen ( TN & P & AN) . This evidence has been given by MW1 , who is functioning as the Canteen Officer from August, 2000 only . So he may not have the personal knowledge of what had happen in August, 1999. Though it is his evidence that he givesevidence on the basis of the records available in his office pertaining to these disputes , it is not his evidence thatthere is record to show by way of any remarks have been made by the then Canteen Officer that the Petitioner himself has abandoned the job and has never reported for dutysubsequent to his absence till 21-8-99 . So the plea of theRespondent/Management , that the Petitioner has alone abandoned the work and left ,has not been satisfactorily established by the Respondent/Management .

the Petitioner . The Petitioner as WWI has admitted in the cross examination that he has received the warning letter under Ex. M1 in respect of his habitually coming late and absenting from duties without prior permission and he has received the show cause notice under Ex . M2 dated 24-8-99 sent to his house address and he has further admitted that he had not given any reply for that show cause notice: It is also his admission that another show cause notice dated 10-9-99 was sent to his house address . The xerox copy of the same is Ex. M9. The letter dated 13-10-99 under Ex . M4 sent by the Canteen Officer to the Petitioner stating that the Petitioner's reply is awaited and he must expedite the reply is also admitted by WW1 in the cross examination . He has further admitted that Ex . M5 is the xerox copy of the show cause notice dated 15-12-99 issued to him . In Ex . M5 itself it is clearly stated that the canteen had given the Petitioner appointment in writing and so they will give him in writing when his services are no more required and at no stage the canteen had ever prevented him . The same has been filed by the Petitioner as Ex . WI . Only for this the Petitioner has asked for Tamil version under Ex. W2 . As per his request under letter Ex . W3 the Petitioner was directed to go over to office to get the Tamil translation of the show cause notice . Then under Ex. W3 letter , the Tamil version of show cause notice has been sent to the Petitioner. For that show cause notice, the Petitioner has sent a reply under Ex . W9 . In that he has stated that the Respondent only has stopped him from service orally and it is not correct to state that the Petitioner himselfhad stopped coming for work . Again the Petitioner has sent Ex. W10 dated 16-2-2000 stating that no reply has been received from the Respondent / Management subsequent to his reply to the show cause notice under letter dated 6-1-2000 and he requested the management to give him work again . MWI has also spoken about these exhibits in his evidence in the Chief Examination itself and has stated that subsequent to the Petitioner left the office in August , 1999 , he has not turned up for work. So the canteen management was forced to employ some other workman in his place and that the Petitioner has left the job on his own accord and the Respondent/Management has not terminated the Petitioner from service . It is not the evidence of MWI or the plea of the Respondent/ Management that the Petitioner was informed by the letter to his house address to report for duty immediately , MWI says that he has to check the record as to whether the management has sent any such letter to the Petitioner to report for duty . So from all these evidences , it is seen that the Petitioner was obliged to be absent for duty due to his illness and when he reported back for duty with the medical certificate, the Canteen Officer was not willing to accept thatmedical certificate and had not permitted the Petitioner to work in the canteen subsequently as a helper . As it is seen from Ex . M5 / W1 , the Petitioner has been given an appointment order in writing by the N.C.C. Directorate Canteen ( TN & P & AN) to serve as a helper in the canteen .

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

04-01-2000

Typed copy of show cause letter from Respondent to Petitioner enclosing Tamil version.

07-03-2000

Typed copy of show cause letter from Respondent to Petitioner enclosing Tamil version.

21-03-2000

Typed copy of the reply submitted by the Petitioner to Respondent Department .

01-12-1999

absence of positive evidence on either side about the nature of the employment of the Petitioner in the Respondent Canteen and on the basis of the materials available in this case that the Petitioner had continuously worked as a helper in the Respondent Canteen for nearly four years and in the absence of any acceptable evidence that the Petitioner had abandoned the work of his own , it can be said that the Petitioner has got to be given compensation for his non - employment. Considering all these things , this Tribunal is of the view that a direction to the Respondent/Management to pay compensation ofRs . 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five Thousand only ) to the Petitioner in view of his non-employment will be a reasonable one , in lieu of his claim for reinstatement in service . Thus , the point is answered accordingly .

Typed copy of the letter from the Petitioner to Respondent Department.

Nil

Postal acknowledgement card forhaving receipt of Letter by the Respondent from the Petitioner.

06-01-2000

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Canteen Officer.

9. In the result, an Award is passed holding that thePetitioner/Workman Sri M. Rajkumar is not entitled for reinstatement in service , but the Respondent/Management N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) , Chennai , is directedto pay the Petitioner Sri M. Rajkumar, a monetary compensation of Rs . 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) within two months , failing which the amounts shall be paid with 12% interest per annum from thisdate.

16-02-2000

W10

Typed copy of the letter from Petitioner to Canteen Officeг.

No. Cost .

For the II Party/Management:-

Description (Dictated to the Stenographer , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 4th March, 2003 ).

Ex. No. Date

K. KARTHIKEYAN, Presiding Officer

31-07-99

Xerox copy ofthe letter from Respondent to Petitioner.

Witnesses Examined :-

24-08-99

For the I Party/Workman : WW1 Sri M. Rajkumar

Forthe II Party /Management : MW1 Lt. Col. P.S. Jasrotia

Xerox copy of the show cause letter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence .

Documents Exhibited :-

10-09-99

For the I Party/Workman

Xerox copy ofthe show cause letter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence .

Description

Ex. No. Date

13-10-99

15-12-99

Typed copy of the show cause letter issued by Respondent Department to the Petitioner.

Xerox copy of the show cause letter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence .

20-12-99

15-12-99

Typed copy of the letter from the Petitioner to Respondent Department.

Xerox copy ofthe show cause letter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence. 23-12-99

Typed copy of the letter from the Respondent to Petitioner.

824 G1/03-30 2968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2003

for adjudication vide Order No. L- 14011 / 53/2000/IR(DU) dated26-03-2001 .

का. आ. 1108.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एन.सी.सी. डायरेक्टरेट कैण्टीन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 269/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-3-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

On receipt of the order of reference from the Government of India, Ministry of Labour , this case has been taken on file as I.D. No. 569/2001 and notices were sent to the parties to the dispute by registered post, with a direction to appear before this Tribunal on 2-5-2001 to file their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement and to prosecute this case further . Accordingly, learned counsel on record on either side have filed their respective claim statement and counter statement and prosecuted this case further.

[सं. एल-14011/53/2000- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th March, 2003

Upon perusing the Claim Statement, Counter Statement, reply statement filed by the I Party/Workman, oral and documentary evidence let in on either side , the othermaterial papers on record, after hearing the arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side and this matter having stood over till this date for consideration, this Tribunal has passed the following:-

AWARD

S.O. 1108.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.269/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of N.C.C. Directorate Canteen and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-3-2003

The Industrial Dispute referred to in the above mentioned order of reference by the Central Govt . for adjudication by this Tribunal is as follows:-

[No. L- 14011/53/2000- IR(DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

"Whether the claim of Shri A. Stephen for reinstatement with continuity of services with back wages from the management of N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) , Chennai is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

Tuesday the 4th March, 2003

Present: K. KARTHIKEYAN, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 569/2001

2 The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the 1 Party /Workman Sri A. Stephen (hereinafter refers to as Petitioner) are briefly as follows:-

[In the matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Workman Sri A. Stephen and the Management ofCanteen Officer , N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN& P&AN)]

BETWEEN

SriA. Stephen

:I Party/Workman

AND

The Canteen Officer ,

: 11 Party/Management

N.C.C. Directorate Canteen ( TN & P & AN ) ,

Chennai .

د. APPEARANCE : For the Workman:

M/s. S. Ayyathurai,

FortheManagement:

Advocates Sri. T. Ravikumar,

ASGC

TheGovt . of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), have referred the concerned industrial dispute

The Petitioner joined the 11 Party/N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) at Chennai as a helper on 8-12-95. He was paid monthly salary of Rs . 1200/- . He was discharging his duties diligently to the satisfaction of his superiors . On 17-8-99 while the Petitioner was on duty, he was called by the Canteen Officer and told to go along with S/Sri T. Gopal and T.Murugan to Ponneri to put concrete fencingpillar for the plot owned by the Additional Director General. In obedience to the direction of Canteen Officer the Petitioner went to Ponneri along with the persons who were also working with him and did the job . On the evening of 17-8-99, the Petitioner developed stomach upset and therefore, he didnot report for work on 18-8-99 and informed the same to the Manager over phone and took leave . On 19-8-99 when he reported for work, he suffered from diarrhoea and therefore, he took leave from 20-8-99 onwards for one weak after informing the Manager . On 26-8-99 he received a memo from the Respondent by post. As the memo was in English he went to the office and requested the Respondent about what it contains in the memo. The Respondent refused to permit the Petitioner to report for work saying that his sickness was false . Again on 28-8-99 the Petitioner went to the office with the certificate of the 2969

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

Respondent could not prove the charges levelled against the Petitioner, the Respondent did not conduct any enquiry. The Respondent is not justified in not furnishing the Tamil version of the correspondence with the Petitioner. The Petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any misconduct and has not avoided any enquiry. His alleged unauthorised absence was due to his stomach ailment of which he informed the Manager. His absence was not unauthorised . His services were terminated by the Respondent in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act. The Petitioner has been suffering without employment and his efforts to get employment elsewhere wereofno avail. Hence , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award holding that the non- employment of the Petitioner brought about by the Respondent/Management is not justified and directing the Respondent/Management to reinstate the Petitioner with continuity ofservice and back wages and attendant benefits and award costs .

3. The averments in the Counter Statement filed by the II Party/Canteen Officer , N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P& AN) are briefly as follows :-

Noneof the averment made in the Claim Statement filed by the Petitioner is admitted except those that are specifically admitted. The proper forum for the Petitioner to raise the claim would be to file a petition under Tamil Nadu Shops & Establishments Act . The Canteen ofN.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) is a private undertaking of the N.C.C. Directorate which is run through Non- Governmental funds i.e. to say that the funds of Central Govt . are not used and the persons employed in the canteen areunder the terms & conditions which are mutually agreed and settled between the Canteen Management and servants and therefore , their service conditions are not par withthe Govt . establishment and the private canteen is not an industry . This position has been clarified by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence's letter dated 27-10-77. The canteen is funding only to cater for few service and ex - servicemen of the armed forces . It is run out of private funds not charging to the consolidating funds of the Union Government. The canteen enjoys certain concessions extended to is like sales tax , Excise Duty which are not collected by Govt . and the profit made are utilised for cadets welfare, war widows , ex - servicemen welfare etc. This stand has been brought out in the rejoinder filed before theAssistantLabour Commissioner (Central ), Chennai for reconciliation. The averments of the Petitioner that he is a permanent orker under the terms of Section 3 ( 1 ) of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment and Confirmatory of Permanent Status ofWorkmen Act, 1981 is not correct, since only9workmen are employed on any day preceding ofthe 12 months as laid down under Section 1 (3 ) and as such the present case has no relevance to Section 2 (oo) 2(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is not attracted. While stock taking was done during July , 1999, itrevealed Doctor who treated him. But the Respondent refused to received the same and told him to go. On 31-8-99 when the Petitioner went to the office and requested the Manager to pay him the salary for the month ofAugust he was toldto meet the Canteen Officer . Accordingly, the Petitioner met the Canteen Officer and requested for salary. The Canteen Officer refused to pay him the salary and told him to go Then the Petitioner sent a letter dated 2-9-99 to the Canteen Officer requesting for permission to report for work . As there was no reply he again sent a letter dated 9-10-99 to the Respondent to which there was no reply. Thereafter , the Petitioner received show cause notice dated 15-12-99 levelling certain charges and asking him to submit his explanation . Since the show cause notice was in English , he sent a letter on 17-12-99 to the Respondent requesting a Tamil version of the charges levelled against him. By a letter dated 23-12-99 , the Respondent has asked the Petitioner to come to the office to collect the Tamil version of the show cause notice . When the Petitioner went to the office on 3-1-2000 , he was given two papers one in English and the another in Tamil and the Petitioner was asked to sign . The Petitioner told the Respondent that he would sign after going through the same. But , the Respondent took back the papers and told the Petitioner to go away. Therefore , the Petitioner came back. Then the Petitioner sent a letter on 4-1-2000 . Thereafter he received the English and Tamil version of the show cause notice dated 4-1-2000 . He submitted his explanation on 6.1.2000 . Thereafter , he sent a letter dated 15-2-2000 requesting for permission to report for work . But the Petitioner received a letter dated 7-3-2000 along with a show cause notice dated 10-9-99 levelling certain allegations and asking for his explanation . The Petitioner submitted his explanation and requested for reinstatement . No reply was received by the Petitioner from the Respondent. Therefore , he approached the Hon'ble High Court of Madras for relief and the High Court was pleased to reject his request on the ground that he could seek relief before the forum under Industrial Disputes Act . Accordingly, the Petitioner filed a petition before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ), Chennai raising adispute relating to his non -employment . The Respondent filed Counter Statement . As the conciliation officer could not bring about a settlement , he sent failure of conciliation report to Govt. , whereupon the Govt. have referred the dispute for adjudication to this Hon'ble Court . The Petitioner has been suffering without employment and he has no other source of income . The allegations levelled against him are false and the falsity of the allegations can be seen from the fact that no further proceedings have been initiated after the receipt of his explanation. The Petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any misconduct . He has not been paid his wages so far , which comes to Rs . 13,200/- from August, 1999 to 30-6-2000 . No charge memo was issued and no enquiry was held. Whenever he was called he went to office , he was not allowed inside and he had to return simply . Since the 2970

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003/ CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

side of the II Party/Management a common witness for I.D.Nos . 568 and 569/2001 as MW1 has been examined and five documents have been marked as Ex.MI to M7 . Arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side wereheard.

6. The point for my consideration is

Point:--

that there were deficiency /discrepancies amounting to Rs.80, 409/- and accountability vested with NCC in - charge , billers , helpers issuing the stores and all the persons were shifted to another job and the Petitioner absented himself from work . The Petitioner did not turn up for investigation conducted . A notice was issued to Petitioner's home address asking him to attend the investigation . The said letter was returned by the postal department with an endorsement ' refused' . The Petitioner was not proper and sincere in his work and he was warned twice for dereliction of duties and on disciplinary grounds . Further more, the Petitioner abandoned the work and left. No injustice has been caused to the Petitioner and as such , the claim is liable to be rejected. Hence , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dismiss this industrial dispute withcost.

4. The averments in the reply statement filed by the Petitioner are briefly as follows:--

The Petitioner was working under the Respondent continuously from the date of joining and that the job he was doing was of permanent nature . The allegation of the Respondent that the Petitioner was a Casual Labour and his service was extended from time to time is false and baseless and the Respondent is put to strict proof of the same . The Petitioner had taken leave on 19-8-99 due to stomach problem and as the problem continued he extended his leave and he informed the Manager about the same . After the expiry of leave , the Petitioner reported for work on 28-8-99 with a Doctor's certificate but the Respondent refused to receive the same and told him to go . On 31-8-99 he went to the office and requested the Manager to pay him the salary for the month of August, 1999: The Manager told the Petitioner to meet the Canteen Officer . So the Petitioner met the Canteen Officer and requested for salary but the Petitioner was denied payment of salary . The Petitioner sent two letters dated 2-9-99 and 9.10.99 to the Respondent requesting for permission to report for work . But no reply was received . Thus , the services of the Petitioner were terminated by the Respondent . The Petitioner has nothing to do with the stock deficiency as he was not the in - charge of stocks . No charge memő was issued and ho enquiry was held . Whenever he was called he went to the office but he was not allowed inside and he had to return simply. Since the Respondent could not prove the charges now levelled against the Petitioner , the Respondent did not conduct any enquiry. The absence of the Petitioner was not unauthorised . His services were terminated by the Respondent in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act . The contention raised by the Respondent that their establishment is coverd by Shops and Establishment Act is untenable and unsustainable . Hence, it is prayed that the Respondentmay be directedto reinstate the Petitioner in service with continuity ofservice , back wages and all other attendant benefits .

5. When the matter was taken up for enquiry finally, the I Party /Petitioner has examined himself as WWI and ten documents have been marked as Ex . WI to W10 . On the

The Petitioner/Workman Sri A. Stephen has been engaged as a helper, the Canteen of Respondent/ Management of N.C.C. Directorate ( TN & P & AN ) Chennai . Itisthe plea and evidence of the Petitioner as WW1 that he joined the services of the Respondent Canteen as a helper on 8-12-1995 . It is not denied either in the Counter Statement or in the evidence of MWI . A suggestion has been put to WWI in the cross examination that no appointment order was given to the Petitioner by the Respondent N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) to join in the post of helper in the Canteen on 8-12-95 . It is admitted by the Petitioner . Anyhow , it is mentioned in Ex. M4 that the Petitioner has been given an appointment in writing and that the Petitioner is in agreement with terms and conditions and signed for the same while taking initial employment. But neither of the parties has chosen to file that documents into Court to ascertain the nature of the employment of the Petitioner in the Respondent/N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) as a helper . But it his plea and the evidence that when he joined the service in the canteen in December , 1995 his salary was Rs . 600 /- per month and his last drawn salary was Rs. 1200/- p.m. and that in August, 1999 when he reported for duty with the medical certificate, the Canteen Officer told him orally that he need not come for work . This has not been denied by the Respondent/Management either in the Counter Statement or in the evidence given by MW1 . In the cross examination MWI says that he does not know whether the Respondent/Management alone has orally terminated the services of the Petitioner and the management has not permitted the Petitioner to report for duty. It is the specific plea ofthe Petitioner both in his Claim Statement as well as inhis evidence that he fell ill on 19-8-99 and therefore, he took leave from 20-8-99 onwards for one week after informing the Manager . After recovery from his illness , when he reported for duty, the Canteen Manager asked him to go and meet the Canteen Officer and when the Petitioner met the Canteen Officer, he asked the Petitioner to produce medical certificate in proof of his illness and when he produced the medical certificate to the Canteen Officer subsequently , the Canteen Officer after seeing the medical certificate threw it away stating that he was not prepared to believe it and told him orally not to come for work.

2971

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5 , 2003/चैत्र 15, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

This specific plea and evidence of the Petitioner has not been denied by the Respondent in the Counter Statement and in the oral evidence given by MWI . It is the evidence ofthe Petitioner as WW1 that after he was informed by the Canteen Officer that no work can be given to him and not to come to Canteen for work , he sent a letter dated 02-09-99 to the Canteen Officer by registered post requesting him to perınit him to work in the canteen and the carbon copy of the typed letter dated 02-09-99 is Ex.M3 . In Ex . M3 itself, the Petitioner has stated about the illness he has developed in the evening of 19-8-99 and left for home after informing the Canteen Manager and when he retumed for work on 27.8.99, he was asked to produce medical certificate and when he produced the medical certificate to the Canteen Officer on seeing the same , he had informed him that it is a false certificate and the Petitioner has no work in the canteen and he can quite the place . So from this it is seen that what he has stated in his petition as well as in his evidence are not the averments made by him as an afterthought for the purpose of this case . But he has stated the same even in his letter dated 2-9-99 under Ex.M3 . Nothing has been elicited in the cross examination ofWWI stating that the Respondent Canteen Officer has not received one such letter , the original of Ex . M3 by post . The MWI has also not stated in his Chief Examination that the then Canteen Officer has not received the original of Ex . M3 by post . So it cannotbe said that the Petitioner remained absent for duty from the evening of 19-8-99 without any valid reason and without informing the Respondent/Management.

M6. It is also his evidence that as he has not received any reply for his letter under Ex . M6 he sent another letter dated 15-2-2000 to the Canteen Officer and the carbon copy of that letter dated 15-2-2000 is Ex.W7 and the postal acknowledgement for the same is Ex . W8 . It is also his evidence that again the Canteen Officer sent a letter dated 7-3-2000 enclosing a Tamil version of a letter dated 10-9-99, the same is Ex. W6 and he has sent a reply dated 21.3.2000 for the same and the Xerox copy of that letter dated 21-.3-2000 is Ex. W9 and the postal receipt ofthe same is Ex . W10. It is his further evidence that subsequent to that he had not received any communication from the Canteen Officer, informing him to report for work and no enquiry was conducted for the show cause notice dated 10-9-99 . This evidence ofWWI is in accordance with the averment he has made in his Claim Statement . It is his admission in the cross examination that he had not given any leave letter for the days he had not reported for duty from 19-8-99 to 27-8-99 . He has further admitted that he was given a warning letter on 31-7-99 for coming late for work and his absence for work . The xerox copy of the same is Ex . MI . A show cause notice dated 24-8-99 was given to the Petitioner by the Respondent/Management that in spite of he was informedthat his presence was essential during 19-8-99 to 21-8-99 he had wilfully absented himself without prior permission and which is defiance of instructions and breach of contract and the xerox copy of the same is Ex . M2 . He would further admit that the show cause notice dated 15-12-99 was sent to his residential address at Chindadripet and the xerox copy of the same is Ex.M4 and he came to know from that show cause notice that the management has stated that he absented himself for duty for his personal benefits, and he has received the original of Ex . M5 a show cause notice dated 4-1-2000 issued by the Canteen Officer to him by post. It is his further evidence that as mentioned in that letter Ex.M5 he had been to the office on 3-1-2000 and when he asked for perusal of Tamil version of the show cause notice dated 15-12-99 he was not permitted then alongwith Ex.M5 show cause notice he received Tamil version of the earlier show cause notice dated 15-12-99 as an enclosure. It is his further admission that in July , 1999 a warning letter was given to him and the xerox copy of the same is Ex . M1 and he has denied the suggestion that he voluntarily deserted the employment and hence he is not entitled for the relief claimed in the Claim Statement . It, is the evidence of MW1 that another show- cause notice dated 10.9.99 was sent to the Petitioner's house address . The xerox copy ofthe same is Ex.M7 . In Ex.M4 itself it is clearly stated that the canteen had given the Petitioner appointment in writing and so they will give him in writing whenhis services are no more required and at no stage the canteen had ever prevented him . Only for this the Petitioner has asked for Tamil version under Ex . W3 . As per his request under letter Ex. W3 the Petitioner was directed to go over to office to get the Tamil translation of the show- cause notice . Then under Ex . W4 letter , the Tamil version of show- cause 7. Itisadmittedby WWI , the Petitioner that he received a letter dated 15-12-99 by registered post and it is Ex. M4 . It ishis further evidence that since that letter was in English he sent a letter dated 17-12-99 to the Canteen Officer requesting him to send the Tamil version ofthe letter dated 15-12-99 . The Xerox copy of the typed letter dated 17-12-99 is Ex . W3 . It is also his evidence that in response to his letter under Ex . W3 , a letter dated 23-12-99 was sent to him informing him to come to the office on 3rd January , 2000 to obtain the Tamil version of letter under Ex . M3 . That letter dated 23-12-99 he received from the Canteen Officer is Ex . W4 . It is his further evidence that he went to office on 3-1-2000 and the Canteen Officer asked him to sign few papers in which some thing were written in Tamil and when he told him that he can sign the papers after going through the same , the Canteen Officer refused for the same and asked him to go , so he returned the papers without signing the same and that on 5-1-2000 , he received a letter dated 4-1-2000 in English enclosing a Tamil version ofthe show cause notice under Ex.W5 . They are Ex. M5 and M6 respectively . The Petitioner has sent a letter dated 4-1-2000 to Canteen Officer stating what had happened on 3-1-2000 when he went to office for getting the Tamil version ofthe show cause notice . The carbon copy of typed letter dated 4-1-2000 is Ex.W5 . He has sent a reply dated 6-1-2000 to the Canteen Officer and the xerox copy of the same is Ex.

2972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

N.C.C. Directorate Canteen ( TN & P & AN) . This evidence has been given by MWI , who is functioning as the Canteen Officer from August, 2000 only . So he may not have the personal knowledge of what had happened in August, 1999 . Though it is his evidence that he gives evidence on the basis of the records available in his office pertaining to thesedisputes , it is not his evidence that there is record to show by way of any remarks have been made by the then Canteen Officer that the Petitioner himself has abandoned the job and has never reported for duty subsequent to his absence till 27.8.99. So the plea of the Respondent / Management, that the Petitioner has alone abandoned the work and left , has not been satisfactorily established by the Respondent/Management .

8. The learned counsel for the Respondent has argued that under the present circumstances, the Respondent/ Management cannot reinstate these people for service but instead of reinstatement awarding monetary compensation maybe considered by this Tribunal on the ground that the Petitioner cannot have a right to claim the post or to hold the post as he has been engaged as a Casual Labour . The Petitioner also has not let in any evidence to show what areall the conditions under which he has been engaged as a helper in the Respondent/ N.C.C . Directorate Canteen ( TN & P & AN) . From the materials available in this case, it is seen that though the Petitioner has continuously employed as a helper in the Respondent Canteen for nearly four years , no compensation has been given , while the Petitioner has been disengaged or non - employed by the Respondent' Management . In the absence of positive evidence on either side about the nature of the employment of the Petitioner in the Respondent Canteen and on the basis of the materials available in this case that the Petitioner had continuously worked as a helper in the Respondent Canteen for nearly four years and in the absence of any acceptable evidence that the Petitioner had abandoned the work of his own , it can be said that the Petitioner has got to be given compensation for his non -employment . Considering all these things , this Tribunal is of the view that a direction to the Respondent/Management to pay compensation of Rs.25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the Petitioner in view of his non-employment will be a reasonable one , in lieu of his claim for reinstatement in service . Thus , the point is answered accordingly .

9. In the result, an Award is passed holding that the Petitioner/Workman Sri A.Stephen is not entitled for reinstatement in service , but the Respondent/Management N.C.C. Directorate Canteen ( TN & P & AN ), Chennai , is directed to pay the Petitioner Sri A.Stephen , a monetary compensation of Rs.25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only)within two months, failing which the amounts shall be paidwith 12% interest per annum from this date . No Cost. (Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 4th March . 2003.)

notice has been sent to the Petitioner . For that show- cause notice , the Petitioner has sent a reply under Ex.M6 . In that he has stated that the Respondent only has stopped him from service orally and it is not correct to state that the Petitioner himself had stopped coming for work . Again the Petitioner has - sent Ex . W7 dated 15.2.2000 stating that no reply has been received from the Respondent/Management subsequent to his reply to the show cause notice under letter dated 6.1.2000 and he requested the management to give him work again . MWI has also spoken about these exhibits in his evidence in the Chief Examination itself and has stated that subsequent to the Petitioner left the office in August , 1999, he has not turned up for work . So the canteen management was forced to employ some other workman in his place and that the Petitioner has left thejob on his own accord and the Respondent/Management has not terminated the Petitioner from service . It is not the evidence of MWI or the plea of the Respondent/ Management that the Petitioner was informed by the letter to his house address to report for duty immediately , MW1 says that he has to check the record as to whether the management has sent any such letter to the Petitioner to report for duty . So from all these evidences , it is seen that the Petitioner was obliged to be absent for duty due to his illness and when he reported back for duty with the medical certificate , the Canteen Officer was not willing to accept that in edical certificate and had not permitted the Petitioner to work in the canteen subsequently as a helper. As it is seen from Ex.M4 , the Petitioner has been given an appointment order in writing by the N.C.C. Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN ) to serve as a helper in the canteen . Thatappointment order copy has not been filed by the Respondent/ Management to show that he was engaged only as a Casual Labourer . It is seen from the material available in this case , that the Petitioner has been engaged as a helper in the Respondent / N.C.C . Directorate Canteen (TN & P & AN) from December, 1995 to August , 1999. As contended bythe Petitioner, the Respondent/ Management has not conducted any enquiry subsequent to the submission of reply by the Petitioner to the show- cause notice and no reply has been given by the management to the Petitioner. As mentioned in Ex.M4 , the Respondent/ Management has not given the Petitioner in writing that his services are no more required . It is the contention of the Respondent/Management that the Petitioner has only stopped coming for work and the Respondent/ Management has not terminated the Petitioner from service even orally. But it is the contention of the Petitioner that even though he has reported for duty after the recovery from his illness and produced medical certificate, the Canteen Officer has only not permitted him to join duty . MWI has not denied it as false . But he has given evidence to that effect that the Petitioner has not turned up for work voluntarily and they have left the work on their fearing of enquiry on the basis of show- cause notice issued to them and they have not been terminated from service by the

K. KARTHIKEYAN, Presiding Officer 2973

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 5, 2003/चैत्र15, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2003

Witnesses Examined :--

: WW1 Sri A.Stephen

Forthe I Party/Workman

For the II Party/Management : MW1Lt. Col. P.S.Jasrotia

Documents Exhibited: -

For the I Party/Workman:

का. आ. 1109.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि सिक्युरिटी पेपर मिल , होशंगाबाद में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 21 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है, उक्तअधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए । Date.

Ex.No.

Description

24.08.99

Typed copy of the show - cause letter issued by Respondent Department to the Petitioner

W2 13.10.99

अतः अब , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

Typed copy of the letter from the Respondent to Petitioner

17.12.99

Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to Canteen Officer

[सं. एस-11017/16/97- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] श्रीमती बी.आर. विज़, अवर सचिव 23.12.99

New Delhi , the 10th March , 2003 Typed copy ofshow - cause letter from Respondent to Petitioner enclosing Tamil version

W5 04.01.2000 Typed copy of letter from Petitioner to Canteen Officer

W6 07.03.2000 Typed copy ofshow - cause letter from CanteenOfficer to Petitioner

S.O. 1109.-Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services inthe Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad which is covered by item 21 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , shouldbe declare to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .

W7 15.02.2000 Typed copy of the letter from the Petitioner to Canteen Officer .

Nil

Postal acknowledgement card for having receipt of Letter by the Respondent from the Petitioner

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -clause (vi ) ofclause (n ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1974 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act for a period ofsix months.

W9 20.03.2000 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to CanteenOfficer

[No. S- 11017/ 16/97 - IR(PL) ] Smt . B.R. VIJ , Under Secy.

W10 21.03.2000 Original speed post receipt addressed to Canteen Officer

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2003

For the II Party /Management : -

Date

Ex. No.

Description

MI 31.07.99 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent to Petitioner

24.08.99

Xerox copy ofthe show - cause tetter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence

का. आ. 1110.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एअर इण्डिया लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण -1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सस्कार को 10-3-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

02.09.99

Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to Respondent

15.12.99

[सं. एल -11012/11/97- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव Xerox copy of the show - cause letter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence

New Delhi , the 11th March , 2003 M5 04.01.2000 Xerox copy of the show - cause letter from Respondent to Petitioner

M6 06.01.2000 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Canteen Officer .

10.09.99

Xerox copy of the show - cause letter issued by Respondent to Petitioner for unauthorised absence

S.O. 1110-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 10/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- 1 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of :

2974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL, 5 , 2003 /CHAITRA 15 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Air India Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-03-2003 .

between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-3-2003 .

[No. L - 11012/ 11 /97 - IR (C- 1 ) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

[No. L -20025/03 /2003 - IR( C- 1 ) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , AT MUMBAI

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , DHANBAD Present : Shri Justice S. C. Pandey, Presiding Officer .

REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 10 OF 1998

Inthe matter of Complaint under Sec . 33A of I.D. Act . Complaint No. 1 of2001 .

(Arising out of Reference No. 54 of 1999) Parties: Employers in relation to the management of M/s . Air India Ltd. AND

PARTIES :

Their workman , Shri Jagdish Gursahani .

RapiritPrasad,

APPEARANCES :

Organisation Secretary, Central Committee

For the Management Shri L. D'Souza

RashtriyaColliery Mazdoor Sangh ,

Rajendra Path , Luby Circular Road,

For the Workman : Workman present in person Mumbai , dated the 10th day of February , 2003

Dhanbad.

Complainant .

AWARD

Vs.

The ChiefGeneral Manager ,

Employer in relation to the Management of

Nichitpur Colliery Under Area -V,

1. This is a reference , under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) read with Section 10 (2 ) ( d) with Section 10 (2 )A of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, regarding the legality and propriety of dismissal of the workman , Shri Jagdish Gursahani .

SijuaArea of M/s . B.C.C.L. ,

P.O. Bansjora, District Dhanbad .

Opp. Party

PRESENT : Shri S.H. Kazmi , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For the Complainant Shri J.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate .

Forthe Opp . Party : Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate .

Dated, the 10th February, 2003

AWARD

2. By order dated 20-12-2002 , the review application filed by the workman has against the judgment dated 23-7-1999 in Approval Application No. NTB- 14 of 1996 passed by this Tribunal has been allowed. The judgment has been modified. The approval application No. 14 of 1996 stands dismissed as a result of the order passed today. Consequent by the workman shall be treated as deemed to in service from 6-12-1995.

Thiscomplaint arises out of Reference No. 54 of 1999 for contravention of the provision of Sec . 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , by the Opp . Party.

3. For the aforesaid reason , the reference has become infructuous . It may be revived in case the order passed on 20-12-2002 is set aside by a Superior Court .

S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2003

का. आ. 1111.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 54/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-3-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20025/03/2003- आई. आर. ( सी -1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th March , 2003

2. By pressing the petition dated 27-12-2002 it has been submitted on behalf of the complainant that the present case was filed as the Opp. Party arbitrarily contravened the relevant provisions of the Act by changing the service condition of the complainant but during the pendency of thepresent case it realised its mistake , cancelled the order of transfer and has agreed to maintain the status - quo till the final disposal of reference case . One copy of the said office order of the Opp . Party has also been filed in support ofsuch statement . It has further been submitted that in view of the aforesaid developments , taken place during the pendency of the present case necessary order be passed regarding final disposal of the case. Mr. Verma , appearing for the Opp . Party accepted the aforesaid developments and the order passed by the Opp . Party in that connection .

3. Thus , in view of all the above , this case stands dismissed as withdrawn .

S.O. 1111. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 54/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute

S.H. KAZMI , Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .