रजिस्ट्रीसं०डी० एल०-33001/99
REGD . NO . D. L. -33001/99 भारतक राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 25 ] No. 25]
नई दिल्ली, जून 15 जून 21 , 2003 शनिवार /ज्येष्ठ 25-ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925 NEW DELHI , JUNE 15 JUNE 21 , 2003 SATURDAY/ JYAISTHA 25-JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3- उप- खण्ड (ii) PART II-Section 3 Sub- section ( ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
मंत्रिमंडल सचिवालय नईदिल्ली, 10 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1674.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग-3 के आदेश सं. 5432( 2)पी/6- पी-3-2002-15 ( 6 ) पी/2002 लखनऊ दिनांक अक्तूबर, 2002 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से पुलिस स्टेशन, पुरकाजी, जिला मुजफ्फरनगर में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 147 , 302 और 506 के अधीन दर्ज मामला अपराध सं. 24/2001 और उपर्युक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त एक अथवा अधिक अपराध तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध और अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं. 228/68/ 2002- डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव CABINET SECRETARIAT New Delhi , the 10th June 2003 S.O. 1674.-In exercise of the powers conferredby. Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the 1590 GI/ 2003
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act . 1946 (Act . No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Uttar Pradesh , Home ( Police ) Section-3 vide Order No. 5432 (2 ) P/6 - P- 3-21002-15 ( 6) P/2002 Lucknow dated October, 2002, hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Spacial Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of Crime case No. 24/2001 registered at Police Station Purkazi , District Muzaffarnagar under Sections 147 , 302 , and 506 of Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 25 of 1860) and in relation or in connection to one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/68/2002-DSPE] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 10 जून , 2003 का.आ. 1675.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग-3 की अधिसूचना सं . 517पी/6- पी-3-2003-15/पी/2003 लखनऊ दिनांक फरवरी , 2003 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से तथा आपराधिक रिट याचिका सं. 6330/2002 में इलाहबाद उच्च न्यायालय
(4271) 4272
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
द्वारा पारित दिनांक 23-10-2002 के आदेश के अनुपालन में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 420, 467 और 468 के अधीन जनपद कानपुर नगर के थाना कोतवाली पर पंजीकृत अपराध सं. 346/2001 और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं . 228/17/2003 -डी.एस.पी.ई. ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th June , 2003 S.O. 1675. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Aet. No. 25 of1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent ofthe State Government of Uttar Pradesh , Home (Police ) Section - III vide Notification No. 517P/6 -P-3-2003-15 /P/2003, Lucknow dated February, 2003 , and also in compliance with the order dated 23-10-2002 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Writ Petition No. 6330 of 2002 , hereby extends the powers and jürisdiction ofthe members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of Crime No. 346/2001 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Kanpur Nagar, under Sections 420 , 467 and 468 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and attempts, abetment and conspiracy in relation or in connection with the offences mentioned above and any other offence and offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/17/2003 -DSPE]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
वित्त तथा कंपनी कार्य मंत्रालय
(राजस्वविभाग )
केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क पुणे III के आयुक्त का कार्यालय
पुणे , 30 मई, 2003
अधिसूचना संख्या4/2003 केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क ( नॉन टैरिफ ) का.आ. 1676.- भारत सरकार, वित्त तथा कंपनी मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग . नई दिल्ली, द्वारा दिनांक 1-7-94 को जारी की गयी अधिसूचना, संख्या 33/94 सीमा शुल्क ( नॉन टैरिफ ) के अधीन मुझे प्रदत्त अधिकारों को कार्यान्वित करते हुए, मैं , ए. एस. आर. नायर, आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क पुणे III आयुक्तालय, पूर्ण एतद्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य के जिला- पुणे , तालुका- खेड के चिंबली गांव को, सीमा शुल्कअधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा 9 के अधीन 100% निर्यातलक्षी यूनीट स्थापना हेतु, वेअरहाऊसिंग स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित करता हूँ ।
[फा. सं. बी जी एन ( 30) 159 /टीए/03 ] ए. एस.आर. नायर, आयुक्त केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF FINANCE & COMPANY AFFAIRS (Departmentof Revenue)
Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune- III Commissionerate
Pune, the 30th May, 2003
Notification No. 4/2003 C.Ε. (NT)
S.O. 1676. In exercise of the powers conferred on me by the Notification No. 33/ 94 - Cus ( NT ) , dtd . 1-7-1994 , of the Government of India , Ministry of Finance &Company Affairs , Department of Revenue , I , A.S.R. Nair, the Commissioner of Central Excise , Pune - III , Commissionerate, Pune, hereby declare , Village: Chimbli , Taluka-Khed, District-Pune in the State of Maharashtra to be warehousing station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 (52 of 1962 ) , for setting up 100% E.O.Us.
[F. No. VGN(30 ) 159/TA/03 ] A. S. R. NAIR, Commissioner of Central Excise वित्त मंत्रालय
(राजस्वविभाग )
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 30 मई , 2003
स्टाम्प
का.आ. 1677.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 की 2 ) की धारा 9 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा मै . अप्पूहोटल लिमिटेड, चेन्नई को मात्र चौदह लाख तीन हजार दो सौ पचास रुपए का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है , जो उक्त कम्पनी द्वारा जारी किए जाने वाले मात्र अठारह करोड़ इकहत्तर लाख रुपए के समग्र मूल्य के प्रत्येक सौ - सौ रुपए के एस ओ सी डी 000001 से एस ओ सीडी 1870999 तक की विशिष्ट संख्या वाले सुरक्षित ऐच्छिकपरिवर्तनीय ऋण पत्रों पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है । [सं. 25/ 2003 - स्टाम्प/फा. सं . 33/26/ 2003- बि.क. ] आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) ORDER
New Delhi , the 30th May, 2003 STAMPS
S.O. 1677.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b ) of sub- section ( 1) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899), the Central Government hereby permits M/s . Appu Hotels Limited, Chennai to pay Consolidated stamp duty of rupees fourteen lakh three thousand two hundred fifty only on account of the stamp duty on Secured Optionally Convertible Debentures bearing distinctive numbers from SOCD -000001 to SOCD- 1870999 of rupees one hundred each aggregating to rupees eighteen crore seventy one lakh only, to be issued by the saidCompany.
[No. 25 /2003 - STAMP/F . No. 33/26/2003 - ST] R. G. CHHABRA , Under Secy.
4273 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
12-10-2005 i.e. when she will attain the age of 62 years or until further orders .
आर्थिक कार्य विभाग (बैंकिंग प्रभाग )
[F. No. 7/2/2003 -B.O. -I] SHEKHAR AGARWAL, Jt . Secy.
विदेश मंत्रालय (सी.पी.वी. प्रभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 2 जून, 2003
का.आ. 80.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वाँ ) की धारा 2 के अंक (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का शाखा सचिवालय, विदेश मंत्रालय, कोलकत्ता में श्री अरूप कुमार साहा , सहायक को 2-6-2003 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून , 2003 का.आ. 1678.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा वित्त मंत्रालय, आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , बैंकिंग प्रभाग , नई दिल्ली में संयुक्त सचिव श्री जी.सी. चतुर्वेदी को श्री अजीत एम . सरन के स्थान पर तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगला आदेश होने तक अथवा वित्त मंत्रालय में उनके अधिकारी न रहने पर, जो भी पहले हो, केनरा बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करतीहै ।
[सं. टी.- 4330/01/2003 ]
उपेन्द्र सिंह रावत, अवर सचिव (कौन्सुलर ) [फा. सं. 9 /3/2002- बीओ -1 ] सुदेश कुमार, निदेशक
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(C.P.V. Division)
New Delhi , the 2nd June , 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS (Banking Division) New Delhi , the 6th June , 2003
S.O. 1680. -In pursuance of the clause (a ) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby authorise Shri Arup Kumar Saha, Assistant in the Branch Secretariat of the Ministry of External Affairs to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 2-6-2003 .
[No. T. -4330/01/2003 ] U. S. RAWAT, Under Secy. (Cons . )
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 9 जून, 2003
S.O. 1678.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of Sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the nationalized Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970 , the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri G.C. Chaturvedi , Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Banking Division , New Delhi as a director on the Board of Directors of Canara Bank wirh immediate effect and until further orders or until he ceases to be an officer ofMinistry ofFinance , whichever is earlier vice Shri Ajit M. Saran .
[F. No. 9/3/2002-Β.Ο. -1 ]
SUDESH KUMAR, Director
नई दिल्ली, 10 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1681.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में काण्डला- जामनगर-लोनी (आईओसीएल सांगानेर स्परलाइन ) पाइपलाइन परियोजना से होकर द्रवीकृत पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए का.आ. 1679.- भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक अधिनियम, 1934 की धारा 8 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) के साथ पठित उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्रीमती के. जे. उदेशी, वर्तमान कार्यपालक निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 12-10-2005 तक, अर्थात् उनकी आयु 62 वर्ष हो जाने तक या अगला आदेश होने तक भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के उप- गवर्नर के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं .7/2/2003- बीओ -1 ]
शेखर अग्रवाल, संयुक्त सचिव
New Delhi , the 10th June , 2003
अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( १ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के S.O. 1679. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) read with Sub - section (4) ofSection 8 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 , the Central Government, hereby appoints Smt . K. J. Udeshi , presently Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India as Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India with effect from the date of her taking charge of the post and upto 4274
[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003/JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to the notification;
भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सी-23 , लाल कोठी शॉपिंग सैन्टर, नजदीक लक्ष्मी मन्दिर सिनेमा, जयपुर, राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला तहसील गांव सर्वे नं. अवाप्तियोग्य
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
भूमि का क्षेत्रफल हैक्टयर में
4
5
1
2
3
458/932 0.1188
माचवा
जयपुर जयपुर
458/1008 0.0792
0.1980
कुल
1083 0.4989
सिवाड
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( I ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object, in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, C-23 , Lal Kothi Shopping Centre, Near Laxmi Mandir Cinema, Jaipur, Rajasthan .
0.4989
कुल
SCHEDULE
1980 0.0950
सांगानेर मुहाना
0.0950
Tehsil Village
District
कुल
Survey No.
0,0040
केलवाड 874
पाली सोजत
876
0.1500
Land to be Acquired ForR.O.U. inHect.
0.1320
878
2
4
5
1
3
0,0400
879
0.1188
Machawa
0,0040
863
Jaipur Jaipur
458/932 458/1008 0.0792
0.0800
881
Total 0.1980
0.1300
861
0.4989
Sinwar
1083
0.1540
855
856
0,0800
0.4989
Total
0.3840
853
1980 0.0950
Sanganer Muhana
0.2200
850
0.0950
Total
0.1440
847
874 0.0040
Pali
Kelwad
Sojat
0.1800
848
876 0.1500
878 0.1320
1.7020
कुल
879 0.0400 अजमेर नसीराबाद राजगढ
863 0,0040 उर्फ चाट
881 0,0800
0.0277
1131
सरदारपुरा
861 0.1300
855 0.1540
0.0277
कुल
856 0.0800 [क्रमांक एल-14014/1/03/जी.पी. ]
853 0.3840
850 0.2200
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक
847 0.1440, NUSTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
848 0.1800 New Delhi , the 9th June , 2003
Total 1.7020
Ajmer Nasirabad Rajgarh Urf
0.0277
Chatsardar Pura
1131
0.0277
Total 5.0. 1681.--Whereas it appears to the Central Goverr.ment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transporation of Liquid Petroleum Gas through Kandla -Jamnagar - Loni (IOCL Sanganer Spurline ) Pipeline Project in the State of Rajasthan , a pipelinc should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
[No. L- 14014/1/03/G.P. ] Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is
SWAMI SINGH , Director 4275 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
5
4
3
2
1
नई दिल्ली, 9 जून , 2003
0-06
122
3ए
के. आर. नगर
बेट्टहल्लि
0-04
3बी
122
0-07
6
121
0-07
1
121
का. आ. 1682.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि कर्नाटक राज्य में मंगलूर से बेंगलूर तक एलपीजी गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
0-07
बैलगाडी रास्ता
0-14
2
75
0-27
1
75
001
5
75
0-25
1
63
0-19 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
2
63
0-07
4
64
0-01
3
64
0-04
5
64
0-03
14
64
0-01
8
64
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
0-09
2
61
0-01
4
61
0-04
3
61
0-04
5
61
0-11
6
61
001
7
61
0-16
36
0-14
52
1 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सं. 21 , पैलेस रोड़ , बेंगलूर -560052 (कर्नाटक)
0-10
2
52
अनुसूची
0-14
1
53
0-03
जिला: मैसूर
53
राज्य : कर्नाटक
क्षेत्र फल
54
001
4 सर्वे सं ० भाग /हिस्सा सं ०
53
ग्राम का नाम
तालुकानाम
ऐकड- गुन्टा
( यदिकोई हो )
0-06
रास्ता
4
5
3
2
0-01
2
53
0-31
101
0-06
3 बेट्टहल्लि
के. आर. नगर
53
0-07
0-16 रास्ता
1
54
0-10
0-19
2 146
54
0-33
4
0-04 145
55
0-35
0-11
1 143
57
0-01
0-06 139
57
1ए
2ए
0-13
2
139
0-08
2बी
57
0-13
1
115
0-06
3
57
0-09
2
115
0-08
1
156
मलुगनहल्लि
0-08
115
3ए
0-05
2सी
156
0-15
3बी
115
0-05
156 2बी
0-09
1सी
116
0-04
156
2ए
0-02
0-19 116
1ए
3
156
0-02
2
116
0-03
155
0-06
0-05 नाला
बैलगाडी रास्ता
0-06
0-01
1
5
147
124
0-02
0-13
12
2
147
124
0-14
0-03
6
3
147
124
0-12
0-05
4
148
124
0-12
1
0-07
143
4बी
122
0-16
2
143
0-03
122 4ए 4276
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] .
2
1
3
4
1
5
2
3
4
5 के. आर. नगर
143
6 0-16
मलुगनहल्लि
131
4 0-01
के. आर. नगर घड़दहल्लि
143
7 0-01
130
4 0-08 141
5 0-28
130
1 0-17 141
6 0-01
130
2 0-10
7
141
0-01
130
3 0-07 141
0-20
8
132
0-11 138
5 0-01
133
2 0-16 126
0-20
122
0-02 78
बक्रेहल्लद कावल
0-09
133
0-11
3
1
0-17
134
0-09
1
0-32
3
1 0-06
135
4
0-34
नाला
0-08 10
1 0-06
135
2 0-04
0-19
2
10
120
1 0-01
0-21
9
136
0-07
1 8
1 0-04
0-03
136 2ए 8
2 0-27
136
0-04
2बी
0-11
12
117
0-20 13
0-27
0-04
118
1 रास्ता
0-04
3
118
0-04 16
0-03
2बी
118
0-05 नाला
0-04
118
6 0-03 212
0-26
112
मुंडूर
2 0-07 211
0-01
112
0-17
1 204
0-25
110
0-08 203
0-09
113
1 001 202
0-06
0-05
109
206
3 0-04
108
0-30 206
6 0-09
68
0-01
यलादहल्लि
201
0-22
67
0-04 199
1 0-17
66
0-10 199
2 0-23
65
1 0-01 192
पी 0-14
65
0-02
2
1-32
65
3 0-02 187
करपूरवल्लि
4
65
186
0-05
0-03
1
63
188
0-01
1 0-37
1
188
2 0-09
0-05
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
181
3 0-01
1
59
0-09
0-16
3
188
59
2 0-09
4 0-24
181
59
3 0-19 180
1 0-01
58
0-11 180
6 0-25
57
0-11 180
5 0-17
0-04
रास्ता
12
0-26 धडदहल्लि
0-05
50
126
0-18
नाला
0-03
0-12
रास्ता
48
1005 127
0-27
48
2 0-04 128
0-01
48
0-04
5 129
1 0-01
48
8 0-04
4 0-19
48
129
6 0-03 129
3 0-13
48
7 0-05 4277 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
3
4
2
4
5
1
3
1
2
0-04
105
0-15
1
बल्लूर-जारी
47
के. आर. नगर
यलादहल्लि-जारी
के. आर. नगर
3 0-02
102
4 0-10
47
1 001
106
46
0-12
0-29
106
3 45
0-05
1ए
0-11
4
106
0-12
45 2ए2
6-03
रास्ता
0-04
45 2ए1
0-21
111
2बी 0-04
45
1
113
45 3ए 0-05
0-09
2
113
0-05
3बी
45
0-09
0-09
3
113
0-17
52
0-09
4
113
0-02
नाला
1 0-05
114
0-04
44
0-08
2
114
0-04
1
119
होन्नेनहल्लि
0-08
1
115
0-02
नाला
0-04
115 2ए
0-13
2
119
0-05
2बी
115
0-09
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-07
1
119
0-24
4
0-12
2
119
0-04
नाला
005
3
119
0-10
8
1
4 001
119
0-08
8
2
0-14
120
1ए
0-07
3
8
0-05
120
1बी
0-07
4
8
0-17
2
120
0-16
9
0-07
3
120
0-10
10
0-14
1
121
0-07
1
11
0-28
2
121
2 0-08
11
001
143
5
0-13
3
11
0-03
6
143
0-04
24
1
0-31
7
143
2 0-03
24
0-04
नाला
001
7
24
0-17
1
144
8 0-02
24
0-03
2
144
0-01
3
24
0-04
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
9 0-03
24
0-10
1
142
0-03
10
24
0-11
2
142
0-03
11
24
005
नाला
0-03
12
24
0-08
3
142
0-05
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-04
रास्ता
0-23
1
22
0-04
1
330
0-10
3
22
0-19
2
330
0-01
23
0-06
3
330
0-22
2
22
7 0-04
330
0-02
4
22
0-01
2
329
1 0-26
21
329
3ए 0-03
0-02
20
1
0-06
1
331
2 0-24
20
0-14
2
331
0-21
2
103
बल्लूर
0-23
2
332
0-13
3
103
0-01
334
0-01
4
103
0-03
1
333
001
2
104
0-07
333
12
0-30
3
104 4278
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
2
1
3
4
5 के. आर. नगर
323
1 0-06
5
296
के. आर. नगर
बल्लूर-जारी
0-03
बल्लूर-जारी
323
2 0-04
296
6 0-05
3 0-04
323
0-05
7
296
322
1 0-07
296
8 0-08 322
2 0-07
नाला
0-13
1 0-10
321
0-01
291
3 321
2
4
0-04
0-11
291
5 0-05
321
290
0-12 321
6 0-05
289
0-04
1
7
321
0-05
289
0-05
2 334
0-05
8
289
3 0-04 321
9 0-05
289
4 0-05
0-02
289
0-05
5 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
317
1
009
288
0-02
1ए 317
2
288
0-03
0-04
1बी
288
2 317
3 0-04
0-08
287
4
1 0-01 317
0-02
3 0-11
287
2 0-01 315
3 0-02 314
0-06
287
3बी
4 0-02
0-04
287
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-05
2
286
381
0-13
0-03
285
381
1 0-19
0-04
1
284
1
382
-18
0-02
0-11
284
2
4
382
0-06
283
383
0-05
1ए
0-04
282
383
0-11
1बी
0-09
281
0-06
384
1
0-08
1
2 0-03
280
384
2 0-10
0-05
3
280
384
3
280
0-04 384
4 0-03
0-23
1 0-13
कावेरिनदी
312
0-14
1
168
2
चिक्कनायकन-
0-18
312
हल्लि
0-05
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
2 0-07
168
0-26
305
0-19
3
168
2
306
0-02
0-33
4
168
3 0-15
306
0-24
9
0-04
बैलापुर
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-05
नाला
2
303
0-14
0-15
नदी
1 0-10
302
होसूर
0-06
47
1 302
3 0-08
47
0-11
2
1 0-16
299
47
4 0-11
0-24
298
47
8 0-03 297
3 0-02
0-02
47
13
0-04
2
297
47
14 0-05 297
10 0-06
47
16 0-05
9 0-05
297
0-02
47
17 296
1 0-04
0-05
47
23 296
2 0-03
0-05
47
24 296
3 0-06
47
7 0-12
4 0-04
296 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4279 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 के. आर. नगर
47
21 0-06
होसूर-जारी
97
12 0-01
के. आर. नगर
होसूर- जारी
0-03
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
100
1 0-03 68
1 0-01
100
2 0-03 68
0-10
2
100
3 0-04 68
3ए 0-01
100
4 0-04 67
1 0-07
166
5 0-05 67
2 0-07
166
1 0-04 67
5 0-03
166
2 0-02 67
4 0-01
125
6 0-03 65
1 0-05
125
7 0-01 65
3 0-05
125
5 0-06 66
4 0-02
125
2 0-01 66
5 0-01
125
3 0-02 63
1 0-03
125
4 0-04 63
2 0-02
165
0-04
1 62
1 0-04
164
0-01 62
2 0-04
नाला
0-10 62
3 0-03
156
0-04 61
0-11
6 0-04
116
60
0-02
1
116 7ए 0-07 60
2 0-03
116 7बी 0-06 60
3 0-03
116
8 0-01 60
4 0-04
116
0-05
11ए
0-02
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
116
0-05
11बी 58
1 0-10
118
2 0-09 58 2बी 0-04
0-06
रास्ता
3 0-01
58
213
1 0-01
हलियूर
0-01
84
250
3 0-13 59
1 0-02
नाला
0-03 59
0-05
2
249
1-13
1ए 83
0-05
1बी
249
0-09
1बी 83
0-06
1ए
249
2 0-07 83
2 0-09
248
0-01 80
3 0-02
247
0-20 80
0-12
2
0-04
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
80
1 0-04
246
0-02
1ए 88
0-04
246
1बी 0-01 79
7 0-01
246
2 0-20 नाला
0-05
246
0-01
3ए 97
1 0-20
245
2 0-29 97
5 0-01
231
1 0-10
6 0-05
97
231
2 0-17 97
7 0-05
231
97
8
3ए 0-09
0-03
231 3बी 0-04 97
9 0-03
233
7 97
10 0-08
0-08 97
233
11 0-04
10ए 0-01 99
4 0-01
233
6 0-11
0-01
233 5बी 0-01 99 5सी
234
4 0-04 99
5ए 0-02
234
3 0-06 99 5बी 0-02
1590 G1 /2003-2 4280
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/JYAISTHA31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 के. आर. नगर
234
5
हलियूर-जारी
0-08
161
के. आर. नगर कैस्तूर
0-03
0-08
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
6
159
0-08 235
009
159
7 0-01
0-04
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
159 10 0-02 रास्ता
0-07
0-02
159 11 436
0-39
0-02
159 12 435
159
13 001
0-04
439
155
0-32
0-11 106
154
2 श्रीरामपूर
0-04
0-12
3 107
154
0-01
1 0-18
32
154
0-06 107
2 0-12
154
12 0-01 107
3 0-06
13
154
0-01
50
1 0-02
154
14 0-04
50
0-01
5
15 0-03
154
51
1 0-04
154
16 0-02
51
5 0-06
17
154
0-03
51
4 0-05
154
0-03
18
51
2 0-01
154
20 0-03
53
010
21
154
0-01 नाला
0-03
154
19 0-02
54
0-22
154
0-02
23
55
3 001
154
22 0-02
55
4 009
27 0-02
154
55
6 0-04
154
25 0-01
56
1 0-05
26
154
0-04
56
2 0-01
154
30 0-04
56
3 0-03
150 5बी 0-01
56
4 0-18
150 504 0-01
57
3 0-01
149
0-01
14ए
59
2 0-11
0-10
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
रास्ता
0-02
138
1 0-29
59
1 0-01
138
2 0-01 181
केस्तूर
0-23
356
1 0-22 178
1-21
356
2 0-02 173
0-01
368
2 0-01 177
0-23 .
367
1 0-04 नाला
0-05
2 0-02
367
175
0-23
367
0-07
3 नाला
0-22
16
367
0-10 164
1 0-01
367
17 0-12 164
2 0-13
367
18 0-03 163
0-14
367
0-21
20 162
1ए 0-17
0-06
रास्ता
162
0-12
1बी
4
385
0-01 162
2 0-04
386
0-04
1 162
3 0-02
386
20-01 162
4 0-03
386
4 0-11 162
5 0-04
386
0-03
5 162
6 0-08
387
0-02 162
9 0-03
0-07
नाला [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 के. आर. नगर
389
2
केस्तूर
0-18
4281 2
3
4
5
के. आर. नगर
नाला
0-02
नाला
0-02
तालाब
0-02
388
0-01
403
1 0-11
398
3 0-07
398
2 0-10
401
1 0-02
401
2 0-04
401
3 0-04
401
4 0-03
421
0-09
1 ए
421
1बी 0-15
2
421
0-02
422
1 0-07
422
2 0-02
423 7ए 0-02
423 7सी 0-01
423
25 0-16
423
26 0-10
4
423
0-06
423
28 0-03
426
1 0-08
426
2 0-11
0-05
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
439
1-03
440
0-09
441
1 0-26
441
2 0-06
रास्ता
0-03 कंचगारन
45
1 0-02 कोप्पलु
44
1 0-08
44
2 0-12
नाला
0-08
42
1 0-01
42
2 0-05
42
3 0-06
42
4 0-05
42
5 0-05
47
2 0-24
48
3 0-03
48
2 0-17
48
5 0-01
49
0-09
41
0-03 सिद्धापूर
नाला
0-05
40
1 0-24
नाला
0-04
40
2
सिद्धापूर
0-31
46
0-06
34
0-17
1
34
2 0-10
34
3 0-11
34
4 0-10
36
0-17
1 ए
36
1बी 0-17
रास्ता
0-01
नाला
0-02
36
1सी 0-04
36
0-04
2ए
37
5 0-15
37
4 0-04 मललि
रास्ता
0-03
40
3 0-26
40
2 0-01
41
2 0-31
नाला
0-04
44
2 0-27
43
1-01 गैडेनहल्लि
39
0-39
40
0-14
41
0-25
42
1 0-28
42
2 0-11
197
ब्याडरहल्लि
0-05
196
0-12
195
1 0-20
195
2 0-23 अडगनहल्लि
121
3-00
122
0-16
133
1-03
132
2 (0-13
132
0-05
1
131
2 0-20
130
1 (-14
130
2 0-06
नाला
0-03
नाला
001
नाला
0-02
137
0-12
1
नाला
0-02
137
5 (009
नाला
0-04
138
1 0-07
2
138
0-06
139
2 (0-12
139
4 006
0-06 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता 4282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31, 1925
1
2
4
3
5
1 के. आर. नगर
103
अडगनहल्लि
हुणसूरु
102
0-26
नाला
0-03
97
12 0-01
13 0-26
97
97
15 0-07
97
0-04
16
रास्ता
0-03
0-12
94
2
95
5 0-16
95
0-11
6ए
95
7 0-09
0-21
91
5
87
0-11
90
1 0-08
90
2 0-12
90
4 0-03
नाला
0-02 जाबगेरे
0-04
रास्ता
हुणसूरु
20
0-06
3
20
0-15
2
20
8 0-06
20
9 0-01
20
7 0-02
20
4 0-02
20
5 0-07
21
1 0-15
21
5 001
21
6 0-17
0-04
बैलगाडी रास्ता
21
2 0-02
4
61
0-02
61
1 0-08
61
5 0-02
60
0-06
6
60
7 0-13
45
2 0-02
45
0-03
5
45
6 0-11
59
0-14
0-02
नाला
58
0-04
46
1 0-12
46
0-06
2
46
3 0-08
46
4 0-01
47
1 0-05
3
47
0-13
47
6 0-17
55
1A 0-19
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 जाबगेरे
55
2 0-12
53
0-05
54
0-11
13
चिक्कडिगनहल्लि
0-18
नाला
0-04
14
2 0-25
1
60
0-10
0-05-
रास्ता
61
0-01 बैलगाडी रास्ता
0-05
59
0-15
39
1 0-07
39
2.0-05
39
3 0-06
4
39
0-06
39
5 0-05
40
0-26
41
0-22
43
0-35
2
3 0-04
43
2
21
0-11 केरेयूरु
21
3 0-10
21
0-11
1
नाला
0-03
20
1 0-01
0-09
19
1
0-12
2
19
0-18
19
3
0-07
19
5
45
0-34
43
0-05
46
1 0-10
46
2 0-14
46
0-13
3
नाला
0-05
3 0-28
41
40
001
39
1-09
41
1 0-02 मंचबोयनहल्लि
41
0-30
2
0-06
रास्ता
40
0-07
11
0-01 हुल्लेयालु
20
1. 0-17 मुल्लूरु
20
2 0-34
20
3 0-12
25 1बी 0-25
25 1ए 0-17
25
2ए 0-05
25
0-21
4 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
30
हुणसुरू
मुल्लूरु
0-21
हुणसुरू
29
5 0-13
29
3 0-09
29
6 0-14
35
2 0-12
35
5 0-14
रास्ता
0-03
55
0-13
1
55
3 0-12
55
4 0-28
55
5 0-13
52
0-05
51
1 001
51
2ए 0-11
50
0-21
43
0-17
48
0-16
47
0-01
46
0-34
नाला
0-03
0-15
45
73
0-13
74
0-08
75
1 0-04
75
2 0-05
76
0-17
77
1 0-07
2 007
77
3 0-04
77
4 0-04
77
5 0-06
78
0-14
रास्ता
0-01
79 1ए 0-16
79
0-02
1बी
रास्ता
0-05
80
0-20
150
अत्तिगुप्पे
5 0-01
150
6 0-01
149
1 0-08
149
2 0-16
148
1 0-13
148
2 0-05
133
1 0-26
120
0-13
119
0-13
104
1 0-04
104
2 0-33
100
1 0-02
100
2 0-05
4283 2
3
4
5
94
अन्तिगुप्पे
1-16
93
1 0-25
93
0-08
2बी1
93 2बी2 0-01
93 2ए 1 0-20
230
शिरियूरु
0-09
219
0-10
229
1 0-10
229
2 0-14
नाला
0-02
228
0-03
2
221
0-01
227 2बी 0-11
227
0-20
2ए
227
1 0-04
207
3 0-08
207
1 0-06
200
1 0-20
201
0-12
202
0-04
198
1 0-06
198
2 0-11
192
3 0-04
192
5 0-06
193
0-05
191
3 0-01
108
1 0-19
108
2 0-10
109
0-20
110
0-01
113
0-21
112
0-02
114
0-20
115
0-28
नाला
0-13
90
0-08
89
0-07
88
2 0-05
88
1 0-07
87
0-17
0-04 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
84
0-03
86
0-10
85
0-15
नाला
0-08
182
1
शिरियूर नाला
0-04
181
1 0-15
181
2 0-03
नदी
0-10
नदी
0-08 हुसेनपुरा नाला 4284
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , DIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
3
4
5 2
291
1 0-07 हुसेनपूरा नाला
हूणसूरु
हूणसूर
2 0-03
291
0-15
291 3ए
0-06
291 3बी
1 0-07
295
295
2 0-01
0-17
296
1
296
0-01
2
3
296
0-04
296
4 0-13
297
0-18
0-10
298
1
नाला
0-04
3
3 0-05 लक्कूर
41
1 0-16
42
0-27
1
0-18
42
2
3
42
0-08
43
0-10
0-25
44
0-01
29
1 ए
2 0-32
29
26
0-03
1बी
0-02
रास्ता
2
26
0-01
26
0-25
1ए
16
1-20
21
0-01
1
0-03
17
18
1 1-14
0-10
111
बोलनहल्लि
110
0-28
1
2
110
0-17
109
0-01
ए
108
0-05
105
0-21
रास्ता
0-02
0-04
88
8
0-04 रंगय्यन केप्पलु
0-12
109
मल्लिनाथपुरा
0-16
113
0-11
114
0-17
117
74
0-01
0-02
116
118
0-15
0-19
122
0-11
123
107
1-34
0-02
नाला
82
0-21
0-18
83
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
3
1
2
4
5
84
0-18 मल्लिनाथपुरा
85
0-17
90
0-12
86
0-29
रास्ता
0-06
0-07
97
1
96
0-09
0-09
96
2
0-09
96
3
96
4 0-24
2 0-05
98
99
0-11
0-08
100 1बी
100
2 0-39
4
100
0-09
3 0-02
100
101
1-04
1
102
0-09
102
4 0-02
2
103
0-24
103
3 0-13
38
8 0-06
38
10 0-03
39
1 0-17
2 0-06
39
39
3 0-03
39
0-10
4
1
41
0-07
41
2 0-11
3 0-08
41
4 0-12
41
40
0-21
222
0-09
44
2 0-03 बिलिकेरे
158
0-12
1 0-15
155
2 0-02
155
6
155
0-14
154
1 0-03
156
0-29
147
3 0-10
4
147
0-09
147
0-02
5
6
147
0-07
0-10
7
147
रास्ता
0-04
2 0-01
133
0-04
रास्ता
3 0-03
133
0-08
133
4
132
1-15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
129
बिलिकेरे
हूणसूरु
5 0-02
129
6 0-07
129
7 0-10
130
1 0-05
109
1-10
123
0-10
110
0-10
2
111
0-02
3
98
0-01
4 0-09
98
96
1 0-10
96
2 0-02
95
5 0-15
95
6 0-10
28
2 0-27 जीनहल्लि
54
2 0-12
रास्ता
0-02
55
0-10
1
0-10
55
2
56 2बी 0-09
56
3 0-12
58
1 0-12
58
2 0-12
59
1 0-07 बिलिकेरे कावल
1-00
1
रास्ता
0-04
15
0-05 दल्लालू
30
0-15
29
0-25
1
27
0-13
27
2 0-03
27
3 0-11
4
27
0-11
27
5 0-03
27
6 0-09
24
0-01
25
0-16
26
0-09 मैसूर
80
0-22
79
1 0-14
2
79
0-19
81
2 0-04
76
0-10
75
0-39
73
3 0-13
4
73
0-01
73
5 0-02
73
9 0-01
73
10 0-16
73
11 0-01
72
1 0-08
72
3 0-24
4285 2
3
4
5
0-13 हंदनहल्लि बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
122
0-01
121
1 0-01
121
2 0-01
112
5 0-19
112
4 0-30
112
3 0-09
0-04 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
113
2 0-09
114
0-14
1
117
1 0-10
108
1 0-10
108
2 0-10
107
2 0-14
106
7 0-16
104
0-09
106
1 0-10
81
0-11
79
0-13
82
0-02
1
0-07 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
78
0-10
77
0-07
नाला
0-03
133
0-26
76
2 0-03
134
0-26
75
1-16
74
0-17
73
1 0-29
72
3 0-02
72
2 0-25
72
0-17
1
71
2-02
91
1-27
पी 5-06
317
दोड्डुमारगौडन- हल्लि
4
321
0-01
326
1 0-11
326
2 0-08
328
2 0-30
नाला
0-16
12
0-08
नाला
0-06
13
3 0-08
13
0-10
4
26
6 0-08
26
4 0-10
27
0-04
28
पी 0-18 4286
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
5
3
4
1
0-26 दोड्डमारगोडनहल्लि 32
मैसूर
मैसूर
33
0-04
0-05
31
1
0-10
34
पी
0-05
35
0-16
36
0-06
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-15
2
38
1 0-07
38
37
2 0-02
37
009
1बी
0-28
37
1ए
0-24
1
83
0-04
83
2
84
0-02
57
0-04 कमरवल्लि
1
57
2 0-33
0-08
55
54
0-15
60
0-06
0-39
1
49
49
2 0-29
0-02
रास्ता
48
4 0-30
37
0-16
1
37
2 0-10
37
3 0-24
4 0-13
37
2 0-02
36
0-01
31
32
0-30
0-29
32
1
नुग्गिहल्लि
31
1 0-04
27
0-20
1
2 0-08
27
0-13
3
27
0-02
26
25
0-05
1
0-07
25
2
24
3 0-14
0-14
1
22
2
22
0-05
0-07
23
7
10 0-11
23
9 0-01
23
0-04
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
4
0-06
4
3
4
0-02
3
1 0-17
7 0-01
3
3
2 0-15
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
5
4
2
3
0-15
3
3
नुग्गिहल्लि
0-02 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
008
ग्रामठाणा
2 0-03
72
72
3 0-08
4 001
72
0-03
72
5
6 0-01
72
8 0-08
72
2 0-03
71
0-08 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
73
1 0-06
0-07
1
68
2 0-05
141
शेट्टिनायकनहल्लि
0-04
1
141
6 0-02
141
0-05
142
3
0-17
128
001
143
1
0-15
1
127
126
1 009
127
2 0-03
004
नाला
0-13
1
120
0-10
121
3
0-05
121
1
0-01
125
00-13
2
121
0-13
3
124
0-12
123
122
001
0-05
रास्ता
10
मादहल्लि
1 0-01
2 0-13
10
0-01
11
0-13
12
0-02
15
1ए
0-29
14
4 0-06
15
0-24
13.
0-16
16
0-03
17
96
1 0-05 जवनहल्लि
2 0-16
0-06
%
3
0-04
95
0-19
1
94
2 0-01
94
0-04 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
91
001
0-16
93
0-03 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
5
4
1
19
जवनहल्लि
मैसूर
4287 2
3
5
223
0-14
0-19 मैसूर
18 1बी 0-06
18
2 0-12
16
1 0-09
16
2 0-12
28
0-08
27
0-30
बैलगाडीरास्ता
0-02
26
0-02
29
1 0-01
32
0-01
30
1 0-22
30
2 0-10
31
1 0-11
31
2 0-12
42
0-07
43
0-20
44
0-22
35
0-11 मल्लहल्लि
152
अणगहल्लि
0-22
8
1 0-01
8
2 0-11
8
3 0-16
155
3 0-18
155
2 0-01
155
4 0-10
155
5 0-14
6
0-09
1
6
2 0-07
1 0-16
5
2
5
0-09
4
2 0-01
1
19
0-14
2 0-17
19
18
0-03
बैलगाडी रास्ता
0-03
20
1 0-11
0-12
21
22
5 0-25
22
6 0-14
7 0-10
22
23
0-01
0-26
209
मुल्लूरु
0-01
रास्ता
0-17
215
1
215
2 0-04
0-09
219
216
1 0-19
218
1 0-25
221
2 0-02
0-24
3
221
222
0-30 1590 Gl/2003-3
मुल्लूरु
224
1 0-06
3
3
0-19
2
3
3
4
पी 0-18
119
2 0-11
0-14
119
1
1
111
0-03
118
1 0-27
121
1बी 0-13
2 0-13
121
123
0-11
124
0-22
रास्ता
0-05
0-29
131
139
2 0-22
140
0-02
141
0-14
नाला
0-03
143
0-07
1
142 1ए 0-21
142 1बी
142 2ए 0-21
142 2बी
154
1 0-05
158
1 0-23
157
0-28
156
1 0-05
158
5 0-16
0-26
1
161
161
2 0-15
30
0-19 देवगनहल्लि
268
धनगहल्लि
0-35
269
0-13
1
269
2 0-32
263
1-03
242
1-09
रास्ता
0-04
240
1 0-06
240
0-15
2ए
239
0-30
238
0-03
237
1 0-19
237
2 0-01
रास्ता
0-05
21
1 0-01 दारिपुर
22
1 1-05
22
2 0-08 4288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
23
0-27 मैसूर
दारिपुर
मैसूर
24
10-29
24
2
27
0-13
28
1 0-07
2
28
0-26
29
0-11 राज्य राजमार्ग -170
0-11
30
1 1-08
49
1 0-31
49
3 0-02
5
49
0-04
49
0-20
4बी
48
0-06
46
1-00
35
10-09
35
2
36
1 0-18
37
0-20
38
0-16
39
1 0-14
39
4 0-14
49
0-14 जयपुर
50
1 0-02
50
0-04
2
केल्लहल्लि
130
1 0-02
128
0-32
109
0-37
110
0-09
2बी
106
0-31
112
1 0-27
112
2 0-01
रास्ता
0-11
102 4ए 0-02
100
1 0-09
100
2 0-15
101
0-23
90
2 0-04
89
1 0-01
90
3 0-29
1
91
0-06
81
1 0-13
81
2 0-09
81
3 0-01
92
0-12
73
1 0-12
73
5 0-07
80
0-14
79
1 0-08
79
2 0-16
79
3 0-22
[PART II SEC . 3(ii) ] 2
3
4
5
0-01 बैलगाडी रास्ता
केल्लहल्लि
78
11 0-01
2 0-07
Π
3 0-14
32
2 0-13 तोरेनकाटुर
46
2 0-12
0-17
47
1
48
1 0-07
48
0-19
2
49
0-04
रास्ता
0-03
50
5 0-12
0-15
50
4
54
1 0-01
0-01 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
53
1 0-11
53
5 0-11
67
1 0-06
67
2 0-09
66
0-08
1
66
2 0-05
0-04
नाला
66
0-14
3ए
0-10
65
0-04
82
107
1 0-01
2 0-14
83
3 0-13
83
84
1 0-01
85
1 0-09
85
2 0-07
85
3 0-05
86
0-02
0-03
रास्ता
0-37
87
0-05
88
0-08
नाला
0-20
134
मुरुडगल्लि
132
1-01
0-39
1
131
118
3 0-06
118 2बी 0-16
1 0-17
118
0-11
109
0-16
2
110
1 0-02
110
रास्ता
0-03
108
3 0-15
108
4 0-14
108
5 0-02
2
106
0-28 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2
3
5 1
4
1
2 0-11
243
मैसूर
दोड्डुकाटूर
मैसूर
243 3बी 0-04
243
3ए 0-10
243 उसी 0-05
0-08
244
0-20
247
4
246
0-20
246
0-01
3
0-14
246
2
0-01
रास्ता
246
0-01
1
250
0-23
0-17
251
2
1 0-21
251
1
213
0-01
212
0-33
215
0-06
0-27
209
6 0-01
183
0-02
207
0-17
206
4 0-11
205
0-21
204
203
0-03
0-05
नाला
2 0-08
184
1 0-16
187
2 0-15
187
3 0-01
177
4 0-15
177
0-12
176
3
1 0-29
166
0-20
167
0-02
नाला
0-26
168
0-21
169
35
3 0-30 चिक्ककाटूर
रास्ता
0-04
1
34
0-12
0-01
33
I
1 0-20
31
0-01
30
1 0-01
29
0-36
28
0-03
138
0-07
17
0-02
111
0-36
16
0-05
14
0-10
13
0-21
70
4289
3
4
2
5
71
0-39 चिक्ककाटूर
0-05 बैलगाडीरास्ता
1 0-12
73
0-20
2
73
0-04
नाला
0-35
85
84
0-01
86
2 0-01
3 0-18
88
0-10
87
0-15
81
2
0-06
81
1बी
0-13
81 1सी
81
1डी 0-01
109
0-03
3
0-15
4
109
2 0-16
37
कमरवल्लि
38 2ए 0-05
0-03
4
30
30
8 0-01
3 0-10
30
0-06
30
2
0-07
30
6
0-10
7
30
बैलगाडी रास्ता
0-02
0-01
29
1
0-12
2
1
माणिक्यपुरा
0-11
3
0-13
4
1
0-09
नाला
0-27
7 3बी
0-15
12
0-04
नाला
0-05
24
0-21
14
0-01
22
2
0-03
22
1
0-03
21
1
0-28
15
1 0-04
19
117
पी 1-39 बोम्मेनहल्लि
117
1पी
117 3पी
117 4पी
5पी
117
6पी
117
117 7पी
117 12पी
117 14पी
117 16पी 4290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
4
5 2
1
3
1
117 17पी
बोमनहल्लि
मैसूर
मैसूर
117 18पी
20पी
117
21पी
117
117 22पी
117 23पी
24पी
117
117 25पी
26पी
117
117 27पी
28पी
117
117 29पी
117 30पी
31पी
117
0-04
रास्ता
0-02
225
0-23
224
0-23
206
0-06
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-12
220
0-24
218
0-12
98
0-22
83
0-04
84 2बी
0-12
3
84
001
1
84
0-02
रास्ता
1 0-09
85
2 0-08
85
89
10 0-01
89
11 0-06
7 0-06
89
0-12
8
89
0-06
88
89
15 0-10
89
19 0-01
0-11
89
17
89
16 0-01
0-06
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-05
58
1
0-11
12
57
0-11
57
11
6 0-01
57
7 0-02
57
0-03
57
8
9 005
57
57
10 0-09
0-10
3
56
0-08
56
1
0-02
39
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
3
2
4
5
47
2 0-01 बोमनहल्लि
46
1 0-15
009
45
3
5
45
0-03
0-12
45
1
2
45
0-01
0-03 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
1-03
43
2 0-16
42
41
1 0-06
33
3 0-13
33
20-11
33
1 009
32
2 009
32
0-10
1
31
0-12
0-21
30
248
0-04 हुयिलाल
247
0-21
1
0-10
247
4
3 0-04
247
2 0-09
246
007
1
246
0-20
245
001
266
1
266
2 0-09
1-04
271
0-25
273
0-08
नाला
0-10
5
274
0-35
275
0-18
12
0-15
14
0-22
13
3 0-18
18
0-20
1
47
005
47
2
3 0-06
47
4 0-12
47
0-06
48
1
52
0-11
0-25
51
0-27
50
56
0-01
0-02
93
1
0-16
90
1
2 001
90
0-21
91
310
0-13
0-28
89
1 0-29
81 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
3
4
5
1 2
81
2
मैसूर
मैसूर हुयिलाल
0-09
0-03
रास्ता
2 0-07
82
82
1 0-14
75
2 0-07
276
0-21 बेलवाडि
0-07
नाला
280
1-18
1-01
285
279
0-01
1
1
153
इलवाल
153
0-07
23
3
153
प्ता
0-06
0-14
1
0-06
2
0-06
0-20
158
2
0-06
3
151
161
1
0-31
2
161
162
0-10
164
0-11
1
0-21
165
2ए
3 0-05
165
0-15
166
167
0-21
122
0-18
123
0-15
114
2
4291
5
3
4
2
202
0-14 कुगल्लि
0-26
201
200
0-25
0-19
198
0-08
113
0-04
नाला
0-27
1
114
0-12
124
2
3 0-17
124
0-03 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
117
0-18
3
2 0-08
117
0-09
नाला
156
0-15
0-23
155
154
0-07
0-21
151
0-17
149
0-24
148
146
1 0-13
145
0-14
0-25
142
0-05
नाला
1 0-19
141
2 0-11
141
नाला
0-03
433
0-08 हेब्बाल
0-26
1
434
3
0-02
2ए
3
1 0-02
0-02
390
मरलूर
0-14 नंजनगूड
114
0-28
1
115
0-02
0-03
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-18
106
0-08
107
2 0-16
108
1 0-15
108
49
0-13 मैदनहल्लि
नाला
0-02
0-14
196
1 0-13
44
43
2 0-07
0-01
रास्ता
43
1 0-15
208
1 0-13 कूर्गल्लि
208
2 0-17
0-02
3
208
0-27
207
0-39
96 पी
0-17
392
238
0-34
0-24
403
244
244
0-34
244
243
0-02
0-22
434
433
0-06
0-03
रास्ता
271
1 0-01
0--08 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
270
0-01
1बी
0-14
270
1ए
2 0-14
270
0-04
नाला
1
268
0-19
2 0-14
268
267
0-02
1 4292
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
5
4
1
2
3
1
0-25
267
2
नंजनगूड नंजनगूड
मरलूर
1 0-09
303
नाला
0-08
0-18
305
0-29
306
0-05
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-32
315
0-06
311
313
0-27
0-19
312
नाला
0-07
35
0-03
34
0-07
2
33
0-18
0-15
32
0-13
नदी
0-15
कपिला नदी
देबूर
429
0-01
0-18
438
0-06
440
0-28
439
436
0-23
435 10-01
435 25
431
0-08
1ए
431 2ए 0-07
नाला
0-09
0-05
रास्ता
2-00
411' पी
400
0-15
0-06
401 2बी
401 2ए 0-13
402
1
2
402
0-10
3
402
4
402
0-12
403
1 0-13
404
404
2 0-11
0-06
रास्ता
405
0-02
0-14
385
383 2बी 0-03
383
0-18
2ए
383 3ए 0-06
2
384
0-08
381
1ए 0-08
381 1बी 0-08
381
1सी 0-08
381
2 0-12
0-04
रास्ता
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
5
3
4
2
0-03
1
379
देबूर
2 0-06
379
2 0-08
378
0-13
378
1
376
0-10
2 0-09
373
3 0-01
373
0-04
374
1
0-12
2
374
1 0-10
371
2
371
0-11
369
3ए 0-09
369 3बी 0-09
369
2 001
368
2 0-03
368
1 0-08
364
1
20-24
364
3
364
363
3ए 0-07
0-06
363
2
363
0-10
1
0-06
357
3
357
4 0-02
0-02
355
2
0-14
नाला
303
1 0-05
2 0-09
303
303
3 0-09
304
0-18
0-02
नाला
308
0-11
308 25
2
307
0-03
3 0-14
307
4 0-04
307
0-17
2
309
310
0-01
0-08
312
0-05
311
1ए
0-09
311
2
311
0-05
3ए
0-06
311 3बी1
314
1 0-06
2 0-12
314
315
0-24
1बी
001
315
1ए
0-17
112
कर्लपुर
0-04
नाला
111
1 0-15
110
1 0-26
110 20-01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
5
4
1
114 2ए1 0-05 नंजनगूड कर्लपुर
नंजनगूड
121
1 0-27
0-04
रास्ता
122
0-12
0-04
नाला
175
001
174
1-06
173
1 0-23
173
2 005
नाला
0-04
0-03
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
190
1 0-19
190
2 0-17
191
0-14
192
0-11
2बी
192
0-13 .
2ए
0-19
216
214
1 0-08
214
2 001
001
209
1ए
209
001
1बी
209
2 0-03
209
3 009
रास्ता
0-02
0-22
नाला
212
4 0-12
212
0-17
5
6
212
001
211
0-21 कलले
91
0-18
641
0-06
89
0-10
90
0-18
008
92
93
0-06
0-03
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-10
102
3
101
007
4 0-10
101
101
2 0-19
0-06
101 1बी
2 007
107
0-22
106
129
0-17
130
0-02
132
001
131
0-14
2
2 0-06
134
2 0-33
151
1 0-06
4293 2
3
4
5
0-07 कलले राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग-21
0-26
152
0-23
159
160
1 002
160
2ए 0-07
160
0-08
2बी
158
1 0-31
157
0-17
165
1ए 0-07
165
2 0-20
0-27
167
2
168
0-02
नाला
0-03
222
0-15
1सी3
221 2ए1 0-01
222
3ए 0-03
220
1ए1 002
220 2ए1 0-02
219 2ए। 0-05
0-04
219 1ए।
219 12 001
218
1इ 0-06
218 1डी 0-02
218
1ए 0-11
218
2 0-06
210
0-26
रास्ता
0-03
0-02
211 1बी1
211 2ए। 005
211 2बी 0-13
212
1ए 0-04
212
1बी 005
212
2 0-18
284
1 0-04
284
2 0-14
3 005
284
208
0-01
171
1 0-02 उप्पेनहल्लि
172
1 0-18
172 2बी 0-14
172 2सी 0-05
173
1ए 0-11
173
0-10
2ए
0-02
नाला
0-19
156
1
0-10
155 2ए1
155 2बी1 0-15
003 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
130
1 0-06 4294
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
3
2
4
5
1
नाला
उप्पेनहल्लि
0-02 नंजनगूड
नंजनगूड
131
2 0-13
131
0-03
1 ए
131
0-11
1बी
0-03
132
1ए
132
0-11
1बी
132 1सी1 0-12
132 1सी2 0-09
127
0-02
1ए5
135
2 0-01
135
1 0-24
136
0-04
1
रास्ता
0-03
नाला
0-02
106
0-05
3
105
0-17
104
1 0-07
104
2 0-10
2
103
001
103
1 0-13
0-03
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
95
0-15 सिंदुवल्लि
0-05
नाला
105
1-23
213
0-09
212
1 0-13
212
2 0-04
211
6 001
7
211
0-04
8
211
0-08
209 3ए 0-09
209
2 0-12
0-05
नाला
201
2 0-09
201
1 0-17
207
0-09
205
0-14
नाला
0-08
0-20
206
204
0-05
2
रास्ता
0-03
275
1 0-08
275
2 0-22
275
4 0-03
284
0-23
285
1 0-03
283
1 0-18
283 2ए 0-17
283 2बी 0-05
286
0-19
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
287
1 0-17 सिंदुवल्लि
294
1-02
0-02 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
289
1-02
472
0-02
2
461
1 0-15
292
2 0-14
475
0-16
नाला
0-04 हेडतले
556
0-07
554
0-21
536
009
1
536
2 0-07
536
3 0-09
0-03 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
532
0-14
1
532
3 0-21
2 0-11
532
531
1 001
223
0-10 कुंबरहल्लि
224
0-24
0-04 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
226
0-08
1ए
2
226
001
226
1बी 0-10
226
3 0-02
226
0-03
4
226
5 005
227
0-21
2
228
1 0-09
228
0-12
2
238
2 0-17
0-03
238
1
239
1 0-09
239
2 0-06
239
3 0-12
240
2 0-03
240
3 0-10
240
4 0-15
रास्ता
003
241
0-26
0-02 बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
5
1 0-27
5
0-05
2ए
5
0-07
2बी
0-07
12
1
11
0-12
10
0-26
1
41
0-32
40
4 003 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
3
2
4
5
1
0-06 कुंबरहल्लि बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
नंजनगूड
नंजनगूड
26
3 0-03
26
4 0-08
26
5 0-10
1
33
0-01
1 0-10
32
2
32
0-08
6
32
0-11
34
2 0-13
35
0-23
58
2 0-07
59
0-05
1
60
1 0-11
57
2 0-02
57
3 0-06
0-04
नाला
3 0-16 हेम्मरगाल
184
185
0-02
0-02
रास्ता
0-06
183
0-01
71
7ए
71
0-03
7बी
8
71
0-14
71
0-03
9
0-01
73
1
2
73
0-27
79
0-16
1
0-08
79
3
0-02
79
2ए
78
0-05
1ए2
81
1 0-13
81
3 0-06
4
81
0-10
0-07
82
1 0-09
83
0-26
84
0-03
रास्ता
62
0-28
0-16
61
92
0-04 हंपापुर
रास्ता
0-02
0-12
91
1
2 0-01
91
0-06
90
1
2 0-04
90
3 0-03
90
4 0-11
90
2 0-01
89
0-13
13
1
13
0-14
3
0-03
रास्ता
1590 GI /2003-4
4295
5 2
3
4
250
0-09 हलेपुर
1
248
0-02
248
2 0-03
248
3 0-03
4
248
0-04
247
0-03
1बी
0-03
247
1ए
247
0-02
1सी
247
2 0-01
0-05
247
3
246
0-04
1
246
2 0-04
246
3 0-07
245
0-04
1
0-02
245
2
0-03
245
3
4 0-02
245
245
5 0-01
255
0-04
0-19
256
1
0-04
256
2
0-15
257
0-05
1
258
2 0-06
258
259
1 0-02
0-05
2
259
0-01
259
3
260
0-14
261
0-11
0-06
266
0-17
267
0-01
268
1
0-03
नाला
417
0-05 नेरले
2ए
417 2बी 0-04
417 2सी 0-12
415
1 0-10
415
2 0-08
415
3 0-14
0-07
414
413
0-06
0-14
2बी
411
411 2ए2 0-01
411 2ए1 0-05
411 1ए1 0-12
408
2 0-11
408
3 0-07
0-15
1
407
0-11
407
3
0-10
406
1
0-22
394 4296
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 नेरले-जारी
नंजनगूड
नाला
0-19
259
नंजनगूड
0-22
गट्टिवाडि-जारी
395
0-31
रास्ता
0-04 396
0-15
258
2 0-18 398
0-02
256
2 0-05 नाला
0-07
257
1 0-01 310
0-01
256
3 0-15 309
0-16
नाला
0-02 307
0-15
255
0-31 306
1 0-04
254
1 0-03 305
252
पी 0-16
0-01 289
0-01
253
1 0-08 290
0-29
253
2 0-07 292
253
1 0-05
3 0-07 292
3 0-01
0-03
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-06
251
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
0-05
1बी 291
0-12
251
1ए 009 232
4 0-15
249
1 0-21 232
5 0-02
.0-22
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
रास्ता
0-02
249
0-05
2ए 229
1 0-07
249 2बी 0-03 229
3 0-01
249
3 001 कोडि
0-13
214
1 0-01 229
2 0-03
214
227
0-10
1
214
20:09 2बी 228
2 0-01
215
0-27 227
2 0-13
216
2 001 228
1 0-15
217
1ए रास्ता
0-02
217
1बी 219
0-17
0-18
217
2ए 220
0-16
217 2बी 41
गट्टिवाडि
1-04
218
2 0-08
0-03
बैलगाड़ीरास्ता
219
1ए
2
22
0-25
219 1बी 29
0-11
219
0-15
2ए 28
0-17
219 2बी1 27
2 0-05
219 2बी2 27
3 0-30
220
2 0-01 नाला
0-04
220
1 0-22 26
0-32
291
0-12
[फा० सं ० एल-14014/11/03-जी ० पी० ( भाग-1 ) ] रास्ता
0-07
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 290
0-14
New Delhi , the 9th June , 2003
0-03
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
270
270
2
} 0-16
रास्ता
0-05
268
S.O. 1682.-Whereas it appears to the Central Gov- ernment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of LPG from Mangalore to Bangalore pipeline project in the State of Karnataka, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;
0-31
0-03
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
267
2 0-04
265
2 0-29
And whereas it appears to the Central Govern- ment that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid 4297 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5
2
3
1
and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
3 0-01
Contd. 64
Bettahalli
K.R. Nagar
64
5 0-04
14 0-03
64
64
8 0-01
0-09
2
61
4
61
0-01 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
3
61
0-04
61
5 0-04
6
61
0-11
7 0-01
61
36
0-16
52
1 0-14
0-10
52
2
0-14
1
53
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited , No. 21 , Palace Road, Bangalore- 560052 (Karnataka) .
5 0-03
53
SCHEDULE
0-01
4
53
State: Karnataka
District: Mysore
0-06
Road
2
53
Sy.No.
0-01
3 0-06
Hissa No.
Extent A-G
53
Name of the Taluk
Name of theVillage
4
3
5
1 0-16 2
54
1
0-31
0-19
54
2 101
Bettahalli
K.R. Nagar
0-07
4 0-04
55
Road
0-10
57
1 0-11 146
57
0-33
145
2A 0-06
57
2B 0-08
0-35
143
0-01
0-06
57
3
1A
139
0-08
1
2 0-13
139
156
Maluganahalli
0-13
2C 0-05
156
1
115
156
2 0-09
2B 0-05 115
0-04
0-08
2A
156
3A
115
0-19
3
0-15
156
3B
115
0-03 116
IC 0-09
155
0-05
0-02
116
Cart Track
1A
0-06
2 0-02
147
5 116
0-02
0-06
147
12 Nala
147
6 0-03 124
0-01
1
0-12
0-13
2
124
148
0-14
3
0-12
143
1 124
0-16
4 0-05
143
2 124
0-16
143
6
4B 0-07
122
7
143
4A 0-03
0-01 122
5 0-28 122 3A 0-06
141
6 0-01 122
3B 0-04
141
6 0-07
0-01
7 121
141
8 0-20
0-07
121
1
141
0-01
0-07
5
138
CartTrack
0-14
0-20
2
126
75
0-09
78
1 0-27
75
Bakkareballada
Kaval
75
5 0-01
0-17 63
1
1 0-25
0-32
3
0-19
2
63
0-34
4
0-07
4
64 4298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
4
3
5
1
2
3
4
5 10
1
Bakkarehallada
120
1 0-01 K.R. Nagar
K.R. Nagar Dhadadahalli
0-06
---Contd.
10
2 0-19
-Contd.
136
0-07
1
9
0-21
136 2A 0-03
8
0-04
1
136
2B 0-04
8
2 0-27
117
0-20 12
0-11
118
1 0-04
0-27
13
118
3 0-04 Road
0-04
118
2B 0-05 16
6 0-03
0-03
118
112
Canal
0-04
2 0-07
112
1 Munduru
212
0-26
0-17
0-08
110
211
0-01
113
1 0-01 204
0-25
109
0-05 203
0-09
0-30
108
202
0-06
68
0-01
Yaladahalli
206
3 0-04
67
0-04 206
0-09
6
66
0-10 201
0-22
65
1 0-01
1
199
0-17
0-02
65
2
2
199
0-23
3 0-02
65
192
P 0-14
0-03
4
65
187
1-32
Karpuravalli
63
0-37
1 186
1 0-05
0-05
CartTrack
188
1 0-01
0-09
59
1 188
2 0-09
59
0-09
2 181
3 0-01
59
3 0-19
3
188
0-16
0-11
58
4 0-24
181
57
0-11 180
1 0-01
0-04
Road
0-25
6
180
0-26
50
(0-17
180
5
0-03
Canal
12
0-05
Dhadadahalli
0-05
48
1 126
0-18
2 0-04
48
0-12
Road
48
5 0-04 127
0-27
0-04
8
48
0-01
128
48
6 0-03
1
129
0-01
7
48
0-05
4
129
0-19
0-15
1
47
3
129
0-13
47
4 0-10 131
4 0-01
46
0-12
4
130
0-08
45
0-05
IA
1 0-17
130
45
0-12
2A2
0-10
130
2
45 2A1 0-04
3
130
0-07
45
2B 0-04 132
0-11
45
3A 0-05 133
0-16
2
45
3B 0-05 122
0-02
0-17
52
3
133
0-11
0-02
Canal
134
1 0-09
44
0-04
1 0-06
135
Honnenahalli
119
0-04
1
0-08
Canal
0-02
Canal
135
0-04
2
2
119
0-13 4299 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5
3
2
1
4
5
2
3
1
0-12
119
2
Ballur-Contd.
K.R. Nagar
Honnenahalli Cart Track
K.R. Nagar
0-09
3 0-05
119
0-24
4
-Contd.
4
119
0-01
0-04
Canal
120
1A 0-14
0-10
8
1
1B 0-05
120
0-08
8
2
0-17
120
2
0-07
8
3
0-07
3
120
4 0-07
8
0-14
1
121
0-16
9
0-28
2
121
0-10
10
0-01
143
5
1 0-07
11
0-03
6
143
0-08
2
11
7 0-31
143
0-13
3
11
0-04
Canal
0-04
24
1
0-17
1
144
0-03
2
24
0-03
2
144
7 0-01
24
0-04
CartTrack
8 0-02
24
0-10
1
142
0-01
3
24
2 0-11
142
0-03
9
24
0-05
Canal
0-03
10
24
0-08
3
142
0-03
11
24
0-04
Road
0-03
12
24
0-04
330
1
0-05
0-19
2 CartTrack
330
0-23
1
0-06 22
3
330
0-10
3
0-04 22
7
330
0-01
0-01 23
2
329
0-22
2
0-03
329
22
3A
0-02
0-06
4
22
1
331
0-14
0-26
1
2 21
331
0-23
0-02
2 20
1
332
0-01
0-24
2
20
334
0-03
2 0-21
333
1 103
Ballur
0-07
0-13
3
333
12 103
0-06
1
0-01
4
103
323
0-04
2
0-01
323
2
104
3 0-04
0-30
323
3
104
0-07
322
1
0-04
105
0-07
2
0-02
322
3
102
0-10
1
0-01
321
1
106
0-04
2
321
0-29
3
106
0-05
5
321
0-11
4
106
0-05
6
321
0-03
Road
7 0-05
321
0-21
111
0-05
8
321
0-09
113
1
0-05
9
321
2
113
0-09
0-02
CartTrack
3
113
0-09
0-02
317
1
4
113
0-09
0-03
317
2
0-05
114
1
0-04
3
317
0-08
2
114
0-02
4
317
0-08
1
115
0-11
3
315
115 2A 0-04
0-06
3B
314
0-05
2B
115
0-04
CartTrack
0-07
1
119 4300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 381
Ballur-Contd .
K.R. Nagar
2 0-13
284
1 0-04
K.R. Nagar
Ballur-Contd.
381
1 0-19
2 0-02
284
382
1 0-18
283
0-06 382
4 0-11
282
0-04 383
1A 0-05
281
0-09 383
1B 0-11
280
1 0-08 384
0-06
1
280
2 0-10 384
2 0-03
280
3 0-04 384
3 0-05
Kaveri River
0-23
4 0-03
0-14 384
168
1
Chikkanaya-
kanahalli
312
1 0-13
168
2 0-07 312
2 0-18
168
3 0-19 Cart Track
0-05
4
168
0-33 305
0-26
9
0-24 306
2
Bylapura
0-02
Canal
0-05 306
3 0-15
Hosur
River
0-15 Cart Track
0-04
47
1 0-06 303
2 0-14
47
2 0-11
1
302
0-10
47
4 0-11
0-08
302
3
47
8 0-03 299
1 0-16
47
13 0-02 298
0-24
14 0-05
47
297
3 0-02
47
0-05
16 297
2 0-04
47
17 0-02
10 0-06
297
47
23 0-05 297
9 0-05
24 0-05
47
296
1 0-04
47
7 0-12 296
2 0-03
47
21 0-06
0-06
296
3
0-03
CartTrack
296
4 0-04
68
1 0-01 296
5 0-03
68
2 0-10 296
6 0-05
68
3A 0-01 296
7 0-05
67
1 0-07 296
8 0-08
0-07
67
2 Nala
0-13
67
5 0-03
0-01
291
3
67
4 0-01 291
4 0-11
65
1 0-05 290
0-12
65
3 0-05 289
1 0-04
66
4 0-02 289
2 0-05
66
5 0-01 289
3 0-04
1 0-03
63
289
4 0-05
63
2 0-02 289
5 0-05
62
1 0-04 288
1A 0-09
0-04
62
2
0-04
288
1B
62
3 0-03 288
2 0-08
61
0-11 287
1 0-01
60
1 0-02 287
2 0-01
60
2 0-03 287
3 0-02
60
3 0-03
4
287
0-02
60
4 0-04 286
0-05
CartTrack
0-02 285
0-03
58
1 0-10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
I
58
2B
Hosur-Contd .
0-04
4301 2
4
3
5
213
1 0-01
K.R. Nagar
K.R. Nagar
58
3 001
84
001
59
1 0-02
2
59
0-05
83
1B 0-05
83
1A 0-06
83
2 0-09
80
3 0-02
80
2 0-12
80
1 0-04
88
0-04
79
7 0-01
Canal
0-05
97
0-20
1
97
5 001
97
6 0-05
7 0-05
97
8
97
0-03
9
97
0-03
97
10 0-08
97
0-04
11
4
99
0-01
99
5C 0-01
99
5A 0-02
99
5B 0-02
0-01
97
12
0-03
100
1
2 0-03
100
100
3 0-04
100
4 0-04
5
166
0-05
166
1 0-04
166
2 0-02
125
6 0-03
7
125
001
125
5 0-06
125
2 001
125
3 0-02
125
4 0-04
165
1 0-04
164
0-01
0-10
Canal
156
0-04
116
6 0-04
116 7A 0-07
116
7B 0-06
116
8 0-01
116 11A 0-05
0-05
116 11B
2 0-09
118
0-06
Road
Haliyur
Haliyur-Contd.
250
3 0-13
Canal
0-03
249
1A 1-13
249
IB 0-09
249
2 0-07
248
0-01
0-20
247
CartTrack
0-04
246
0-02
1A
246
IB 0-01
246
2 0-20
246
001
3A
245
0-29
2
1 0-10
231
2 0-17
231
231
3A 0-09
0-04
3B
231
7
233
0-08
233
001
10A
233
6 0-11
233
001
5B
234
4 0-04
234
3 0-06
5
234
0-08 CartTrack
0-08
235
0-09 CartTrack
0-04
0-07
Road
436
0-39
435
0-04
439
0-32
106
0-12 Srirampura
107
1 0-18
2
107
0-12
107
3 0-06
50
1 0-02
50
5 0-01
0-04
51
1
5
51
0-06
005
51
4
51
2 0-01
53
0-10
Canal
0-03
54
0-22
55
3 0-01
55
4 0-09
55
6 0-04
56
0-05
1
56
2 001
56
0-03
3
56
4 0-18
57
3 001 4302
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
5
4
1
2
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5 Kestur-Contd. 138
1 0-29
K.R. Nagar
0-11 K.R. Nagar Srirampura Contd. 59
0-02
Road
59
1 0-01 Kestur
181
0-23
178
1-21
173
0-01
177
0-23
Canal
0-05
175
0-23
Nala
0-22
0-01
164
1
164
2 0-13
163
0-14
0-17
162 1A
162
IB 0-12
162
2 0-04
3
162
0-02
4
162
0-03
162
5 0-04
6
162
0-08
162
9 0-03
161
0-03
159
0-08
6
159
7 0-01
159
10 0-02
159
11 0-02
159
12 0-02
159
13 0-01
155
0-11
154
2 0-04
0-01
154
3
154
32 0-06
0-01
154
12
154
13 0-01
154
14 0-04
154
15 0-03
154
16 0-02
154
17 0-03
154
18 0-03
154
20 0-03
154
21 0-01
154
19 0-02
23 0-02
154
154
22 0-02
154
27 0-02
154
25 0-01
154
26 0-04
154
30 0-04
150
5B 0-01
150 5A4 0-01
149 14A 0-01
0-10
CartTrack
138
2 0-01
356
1 0-22
2
356
0-02
368
2 0-01
367
1 0-04
2 0-02
367
0-07
367
3
367
0-10
16
367
17 0-12
367
0-03
18
367
20 0-21
0-06
Road
385
4 0-01
386
1 0-04
386
2 0-01
4
386
0-11
386
5 0-03
387
0-02
Canal
0-07
389
2 0-18
0-02
Nala
Canal
0-02
0-02
Pond
388
0-01
403
0-11
1
398
3 0-07
398
2 0-10
401
1 0-02
0-04
401
2
3
401
0-04
0-03
401
4
0-09
421
1A
0-15
421
IB
421
0-02
2
1 0-07
422
422
2 0-02
7A 0-02
423
423
7C 0-01
25
423
0-16
423
26 0-10
4
423
0-06
423
0-03
28
426
0-08
1
426
2 0-11
0-05 CartTrack
439
1-03
0-09
440
441
0-26
1
441
2 0-06
0-03
Road
45
0-02
1
Kanchagana
Koppal
44
1 0-08 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4303 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
2 0-12
K.R. Nagar Kanchagana Koppal 44
130
1 0-14
K.R. Nagar
Adaganahalli
Canal
0-08
130
2 0-06 42
1 0-01
Canal
0-03 42
2 0-05
Canal
001 42
3
Canal
0-02
0-06
42
4 0-05
137
1 0-12 42
5 0-05
Canal
0-02 47
2 0-24
137
6 0-09 48
3 0-03
Canal
0-04 48
2 0-17
138
1 0-07 48
0-01
5
138
2 0-06 49
139
2
0-09
0-12 41
4
139
0-06
0-03
Siddapura
Canal
CartTrack
0-06
0-05
40
103
0-24
1
102
0-26 Canal
0-04
40
Canal
2
0-03
0-31
97
46
12 0-01
0-06
97
13 0-26 34
1 017
97
15 0-07 34
2 0-10
16
97
0-04 34
3 0-11
Road
0-03 34
4 0-10
94
2 0-12 36
1A 0-17
95
5 0-16 36
IB 0-17
95
6A 0-11 Road
001
7
95
0-09 Canal
0-02
91
0-21 36
IC 0-04
87
5 0-11 36
2A 0-04
90
1 0-08 37
0-15
5
90
2 0-12 37
4 0-04
90
4 0-03 Road
0-03
Canal
0-02 Malali
40
3 0-26
Hunsur
Road
0-04
Jabagere
40
2 0-01
20
0-06
3 41
2 0-31
20
2 0-15 Canal
0-04
20
8 0-06 44
2 0-27
20
9 0-01 43
1-01
20
7 0-02 Gowdenahalli
39
0-39
20
4 0-02 40
0-14
20
5 0-07 41
0-25
21
1 0-15 42.
1 0-28
21
5 0-01 42
2 0-11
21
0-17
6 Byadarahalli
197
0-05
0-04
CartTrack
196
0-12
2
21
0-02 195
1 0-20
61
4 0-02 195
2 0-23
61
1 0-08 121
3-00
Adaganahalli
61
5 0-02 122
0-16
6
60
0-06 133
1-03
60
7 0-13 132
2 0-13
45
2 0-02 132
1 0-05
45
5 0-03 131
2 0-20
45
6 0-11 1590 GI /2003-5 4304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31, 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 Hunsur
59
Jabagere
0-14
Canal
0-02
58
0-04
46
1 0-12
46
2 0-06
46
3 0-08
46
4 0-01
47
1 0-05
47
3 0-13
47
6 0-17
55
1A 0-19
55
2 0-12
53
0-05
54
0-11
13
Chikkadiganahalli
0-18
Nala
0-04
14
2 0-25
60
1 0-10
Road
0-05
61
0-01
CartTrack
0-05
59
0-15
39
1 0-07
39
2 0-05
39
3 0-06
39
4 0-06
39
5 0-05
40
0-26
41
0-22
43
2 0-35
43
3 0-04
21
2
Keriyuru
0-11
21
3 0-10
21
1 0-11
Nala
0-03
20
1 0-01
19
1 0-09
19
2 0-12
19
3 0-18
19
5 0-07
45
0-34
43
0-05
46
1 0-10
46
2 0-14
46
3 0-13
Nala
0-05
41
3 0-28
40
0-01
39
009
1
Manchabaya- 41
0-02
nahalli
41
2 0-30
Road
0-06
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2
3
4
5
40
0-07
11
Hulleyalu
0-01 Mullur
20
1 0-17
20
2 0-34
20
3 0-12
25
IB 0-25
25
1A 0-17
25
2A 0-05
25
4 0-21
30
0-21
29
5 0-13
29
3 009
29
6 0-14
35
2 0-12
35
5 0-14
Road
0-03
55
1 0-13
55
3 0-12
55
4 0-28
55
5 0-13
52
0-05
51
1 0-01
51
2A 0-11
50
0-21
43
0-17
48
0-16
47
0-01
46
0-34
Canal
0-03
45
0-15
73
0-13
74
0-08
75
0-04
1
75
2 0-05
76
0-17
77
1 0-07
77
2 0-07
77
3 0-04
77
4 0-04
77
5 0-06
78
0-14
Road
0-01
79
1A 0-16
79
IB 0-02
Road
0-05
80
0-20
150
5
Atthiguppe
0-01
6
150
0-01
149
1 0-08
149
2 0-16
148
1 0-13
148
2 0-05
133
1 0-26 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
1 2
3
1
120
0-13 Hunsur Atthiguppe
0-13
119
0-04
104
1
1-33
2
104
0-02
1
100
0-05
2
100
1-16
94
93
1 0-25
0-08
93 2B1
0-01
2B2
93
0-20
93 2A1
009
230
Siriyur
0-10
219
0-10
1
229
0-14
2
229
0-02
Canal
0-03
228
221
2 001
2B 0-11
227
0-20
2A
227
0-04
1
227
0-08
207
3
0-06
207
1
1
200
0-20
0-12
201
0-04
202
0-06
1
198
0-11
2
198
3 0-04
192
0-06
5
192
0-05
193
001
3
191
0-19
108
1
0-10
2
108
0-20
109
001
110
0-21
113
0-02
112
0-20
114
0-28
115
0-13
Nala
0-08
90
0-07
89
0-05
2
88
0-07
1
88
87
0-17
0-04
CartTrack
0-03
84
0-10
86
0-15
85
0-08
Canal
0-04
1
182
SiriyurNala
0-15
1
181
4305
5
3
4
2
0-03
181
2
SiriyurNala
0-10
River
0-08
River
Hussainpura
Nalal
0-07
1
291
0-03
2
291
0-15
3A
291
3B 0-06
291
295
1 0-07
2 001
295
296
1 0-17
2 0-01
296
3 0-04
296
4 0-13
296
0-18
297
0-10
298
1
0-04
Nala
005
3
3
Lakkur
0-16
41
1
0-27
42
1
0-18
2
42
0-08
3
42
0-10
43
0-25
44
001
29 1A
0-32
2
29
0-03
26
IB
0-02
Road
001
26
2
0-25
26
1A
1-20
16
1 0-01
21
0-03
17
1--14
1
18
0-10
111
Bolanahalli
0-28
1
110
0-17
2
110
0-01
A
109
1-05
108
105
0-21
0-02
Road
0-04
88
0-04
8
Rangayana
Koppal
0-12 Mallinathapura 109
0-16
113
0-11
114
0-17
117
0-01
74
0-02
116
0-15
118
0-19
122
0-11
123 4306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 Hunsur
1-34 Mallinathapura 107
Nala
0-02
82
0-21
0-18
83
84
0-18
85
0-17
90
0-12
86
0-29
Road
0-06
97
0-07
96
1 0-09
96
2 0-09
96
3 0-09
96
4 0-24
98
2 0-05
99
0-11
100
IB 0-08
100
2 0-39
100
4 0-09
100
3 0-02
101
1-04
0-09
102
1
102
4 0-02
103
2 0-24
103
0-13
3
38
8 0-06
38
0-03
10
39
1 0-17
39
2 0-06
39
3 0-03
39
4 0-10
41
1 0-07
2
41
0-11
41
3 0-08
4
41
0-12
40
0-21
222
0-09
44
2 0-03
158
Bilikere
0-12
1
155
0-15
155
0-02
2
155
0-14
6
154
1 0-03
156
0-29
147
3 0-10
147
4 0-09
147
5 0-02
147
6 0-07
147
7 0-10
Road
0-04
133
2 0-01
Road
0-04
3
133
0-03
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 Bilikere
4
133
0-08
132
1-15
129
5 0-02
129
6 0-07
129
7 0-10
130
1 0-05
109
1-10
123
0-10
110
0-10
111
2 0-02
98
3 0-01
98
4 0-09
96
1 0-10
96
2 0-02
95
5 0-15
95
6 0-10 Jeenahalli
28
2 0-27
54
2 0-12
Road
0-02
0-10
55
1
55
2 0-10
56
2B 0-09
56
3 0-12
58
1 0-12
58
2 0-12
59
1 0-07 Bilikere Kaval
1
1-00
Road
0-04 Dallalu
15
0-05
30
0-15
29
0-25
27
0-13
1
27
0-03
2
27
3 0-11
4 0-11
27
27
5 0-03
27
6 009
24
0-01
25
0-16
26
0-09
80
0-22
79
1 0-14
79
2 0-19
81
2 0-04
76
0-10
75.
0-39
73
3 0-13
73
4 0-01
5
73
0-02
9
73
0-01
73
0-16
10
73
11 0-01
72
1 0-08 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
72
Dallalur
3 0-24 Hunsur
Cart Track
0-13 Handana-
122
0-01 halli
121
0-01
1
2 0-01
121
0-19
5
112
0-30
112
4
0-09
3
112
CartTrack
0-04
009
2
113
1 0-14
114
0-10
117
1
0-10
108
1
0-10
2
108
2 0-14
107
7 0-16
106
104
0-09
106
0-10
1
0-11
81
79
0-13
82
1 0-02
0-07
CartTrack
0-10
78
0-07
77
0-03
Nala
0-26
133
2
76
0-03
0-26
134
75
1-16
74
0-17
0-29
73
1
72
3 0-02
2 0-25
72
72
1 0-17
71
2-02
1-27
91
317
P 5-06 Doddamaragn-
Mysore
0-01
4
321
danahalli
326
1 0-11
2
326
0-08
2 0-30
328
0-16
Nala
12
0-08
Nala
0-06
13
3 0-08
13
4 0-10
6
26
0-08
4
26
0-10
0-04
27
P 0-18
28
32
0-26
33
0-04
4307
3
2
4
5
31
1 0-05 Doddamaragn-
34
P 0-10 danahalli
35
0-05
0-16
36
CartTrack
0-06
38
2 0-15
0-07
38
1
37
2 0-02
37
IB 009
37
0-28
1A
1 0-24
83
83
2 0-04
0-02
84
57
1
Kammaravalli
0-04
2 0-33
57
1-08
55
54
0-15
0-06
60
49
1 0-39
0-29
2
49
Road
0-02
48
0-30
4
37
1 0-16
0-10
2
37
37
3 0-24
4
37
0-13
36
2 0-02
0-01
31
0-30
32
32
1 0-29 Nuggihalli
31
1 0-04
0-20
27
1
2
27
0-08
3
27
0-13
0-02
26
25
1 0-05
2 0-07
25
24
3 0-14
1 0-14
22
22
2 0-05
7 0-07
23
23
10 0-11
9
23
0-01
0-04 CartTrack
0-06
4
4
4
3 0-02
3
1 0-17
3
0-01
7
2 0-15
3
0-15
3
3
0-02 CartTrack
0-08 Village Site
2 0-03
72 4308
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
3 0-08 Mysore Nuggihalli Contd . 72
72
4 0-01
72
5 0-03
72
6 0-01
72
8 0-08
71
2 0-03
CartTrack
0-08
73
1 0-06
68
1 0-07
2
Shettinaikanhailli 141
0-05
141
1 0-04
141
6 0-02
142
0-05
3
128
0-17
143
1 0-01
1
127
0-15
126
1 0-09
127
0-03
2
Nala
0-04
120
0-13
1
121
3 0-10
121
1 0-05
125
0-01
121
0-13
2
124
3 0-13
123
0-12
0-01
122
Road
0-05 Madahalli
10
0-01
1
10
2 0-13
11
0-01
12
0-13
15
1A 0-02
14
0-29
4
15
0-06
13
0-24
16
0-16
17
0-03
0-05 Javanahalli
96
1
96
2 0-16
96
3 0-06
95
0-04
94
1 0-19
94
2 0-01
CartTrack
0-04
91
0-01
93
0-16
CartTrack
0-03
19
0-19
18
IB 0-06
18
2 0-12
16
1 0-09
16
2 0-12
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2
3
4
5
28
0-08
27
0-30 CartTrack
0-02
26
0-02
29
0-01
1
32
0-01
30
1 0-22
30
2 0-10
31
1 0-11
31
2 0-12
42
0-07
0-20
43
44
0-22
35
Mallahalli
0-11
152
0-22 Anagahalli
8
1 0-01
8
2 0-11
3
8
0-16
155
3 0-18
155
2 001
155
0-10
4
155
5 0-14
6
1 0-09
6
0-07
2
5
1 0-16
2
5
0-09
4
2 0-01
19
1 0-14
19
0-17
2
18
0-03
Road
0-03
20
1 0-11
21
0-12
22
5 0-25
22
6 0-14
22
7 0-10
23
0-01
209
Mulluru
0-26
Road
0-01
215
1 0-17
215
2 0-04
219
0-09
216
1 0-19
218
1 0-25
221
2 0-02
221
3 0-24
222
0-30
223
0-14
224
1 0-06
1
3
3
0-19
2
3
3
}
4
P 0-18 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
3
4
2
5
1
119
Mysore
2
Mulluru
0-11 Mysore
119
1 0-14
111
1 0-03
118
1 0-27
121
IB 0-13
121
2 0-13
123
0-11
124
0-22
Road
0-05 Mulluru
131
0-29
139
2 0-22
140
0-02
141
0-14
Nala
0-03
143
1 0-07
142 1A0-21
142
142 2A0-21
142 2B J
154
1 0-05
158
1 0-23
157
0-28
156
1 0-05
5
158
0-16
161
1 0-26
161
2 0-15
0-19
Devaganahalli 30
268
0-35
Dhanagahalli
1 0-13
269
269
2 0-32
263
1-03
242
1-09
Road
0-04
240
1 0-06
240
2A 0-15
239
0-30
238
0-03
237
1 0-19
237
2 0-01
Road
0-05
21
1 0-01
Daripura
22
1 1-05
22
2 0-08
23
0-27
24
10-29
24
Mysore
2
27
0-13
28
1 0-07
28
2 0-26
29
0-11
SH-170
0-11
30
1 1-08
49
1 0-31
4309 2
4
3
5
49
3 0-02 Daripura
49
5 0-04
49
4B 0-20
48
0-06
46
1-00
35
1
35
2009
36
1 0-18
37
0-20
38
0-16
39
1 0-14
39
4 0-14
49
0-14 Jayapura
50
0-02
1
50
2 0-04 Keillahailli
130
1 0-02
128
0-32
109
0-37
110
2B 0-09
106
0-31
112
0-27
1
112
2 001
Road
0-11
102 4A 0-02
100
1 0-09
0-15
100
2
101
0-23
90
2 0-04
89
1 0-01
90
3 0-29
91
1 0-06
81
1 0-13
81
2 0-09
3
81
0-01
92
0-12
73
1 0-12
73
5 0-07
80
0-14
79
1 0-08
79
2 0-16
79
3 0-22 CartTrack
0-01
78
11 0-01
77
2 0-07
3 0-14 Torenakatur
32
2 0-13
46
2 0-12
47
1 0-17
48
1 0-07
48
2 0-19
49
0-04
Road
0-03
50
5 0-12 4310
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31, 1925
1
2
3
5
4
1 Torenakatur
Mysore
50
4 0-15
54
1 0-01
CartTrack
0-01
53
1 0-11
53
5 0-11
67
1 0-06
67
2 0-09
66
1 0-08
66
2 0-05
Canal
0-04
66
3A 0-14
65
0-10
82
0-04
107
1 0-01
83
2 0-14
83
3 0-13
84
1 0-01
85
1 0-09
85
2 0-07
3
85
0-05
86
0-02
Road
0-03
87
0-37
88
0-05
Nala
0-08
134
0-20 Muradagali
132
1-01
131
1 0-39
118
3 0-06
118
0-16
2B
118
1 0-17
109
0-11
110
2 0-16
110
0-02
1
Road
0-03
108
3 0-15
108
4 0-14
5
108
0-02
106
2 0-28 Doddakatur
243
0-11
2
243
3B 0-04
243
3A 0-10
243
3C 0-05
244
0-08
247
0-20
246
4 0-20
246
3 0-01
246
2 0-14
Road
0-01
246
1 0-01
250
0-23
251
2 0-17
251
1 0-21
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2
3
4
5
213
0-01
1
212
0-33
215
0-06
209
0-27
183
6 0-01
207
0-02
206
0-17
205
4 0-11
204
0-21
203
0-03
Canal
0-05
184
2 0-08
187
1 0-16
187
2 0-15
177
3 0-01
177
4 0-15
176
3 0-12
166
1 0-29
167
0-20
Canal
0-02
168
0-26
169
0-21 Chikkakatur
35
3 0-30
Road
0-04
34
0-12
1
33
1 0-01
1 0-20
30
1-01
0-01
1
28
0-36
ཤཊཋསི*
138
0-03
17
0-07
111
0-02
16
0-36
14
0-05
13
0-10
70
0-21
71
0-39
0-05 CartTrack
73
0-12
1
73
2 0-20
Canal
0-04
85
0-35
84
0-01
86
2 1-01
88
3 0-18
87
0-10
81
2 0-15
81
IB 0-06
81
IC 0-13
81
ID 0-01
109
3 0-03
109
4 0-15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4311 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Kamaravalli
Mysore
37
2 0-16 Mysore Bommenahalli Cart Track
0-06 38
2A 0-05
220
0-12 30
4 0-03
218
0-24 30
8 0-01
98
0-12 30
3 0-10
83
0-22 30
2 0-06
84
2B 0-04 30
6 0-07
84
3 0-12 30
7 0-10
84
1 0-01 Cart Track
0-02
Road
0-02 29
0-01
85
1
1
0-09 2
Manikyapura
1 0-12
85
2 0-08 3
0-11
89
10 0-01 4
1 0-13
89
11 0-06 Nala
0-09
89
7 0-06 7
3B 0-27
8
89
0-12 12
0-15
88
0-06 Nala
0-04
89
15 0-10 24
0-05
89
19 001 14
0-21
89
17 0-11 22
2 0-01
89
16 0-01 22
1 0-03
CartTrack
0-06 21
1 0-03
58
1 0-05 15
0-28
57
12 0-11 19
1
57
0-04
11 0-11 117
Bommenahalli
.P 1-39
57
6 0-01 117
IP
57
7 0-02 117
3P
8
57
0-03 117
4P
9
57
0-05 117
5P
57
0-09
10 117
6P
56
3 0-10 117
56
7P
1 0-08 117
12P
39
0-02 117
14P
47
0-01
2 117
16P
46
1 0-15 117
17P
45
3 0-09 117 18P
5
45
0-03 117 20P
45
1 0-12 117 21P
45
2 001 117 22P
CartTrack
0-03 117 23P
43
1-03 117
24P
42
2 0-16
25P
117
41
1 0-06 117 26P
33
3 0-13 117
27P
33
2 0-11 117 28P
33
1 009 117 29P
32
2 0-09 117 30P
32
1 0-10 117 31P
31
0-12 Road
0-04
30
0-21 225
Huilala
0-02
248
0-04 224
0-23
247
1 0-21 206
0-23
247
4 0-10 1590 GI/2003-6 4312
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 Huilala
247
3
Mysore
Mysore
0-04
246
2 0-09
246
1 0-07
245
0-20
266
1 0-01
266
2 0-09
271
1-04
273
0-25
Nala
0-08
274
5 0-10
275
0-35
12
0-18
14
0-15
13
0-22
18
3 0-18
47
1 0-20
47
2 0-05
47
3 0-06
4
47
0-12
48
1 0-06
52
0-11
51
0-25
50
0-27
56
0-01
93
1 0-02
90
1 0-16
90
2 0-01
91
0-21
310
0-13
89
0-28
81
1 0-29
81
2 0-09
Road
0-03
82
2 0-07
82
0-14
1
75
2 0-07
Belawadi
276
0-21
Nala
0-07
280
1-18
285
1-01
279
1 0-01
Elawala
153
153
0-07
153
1 23 3 }}
Road
0-06
157
1 0-14
157
2 0-06
Road
0-06
158
0-20
2
151
3 0-06
161
161
20-31
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ) 2
3
4
5 Elawala
162
0-10
1 0-11
164
165
0-21
2A
3
165
0-05
166
0-15
167
0-21
122
0-18
123
0-15
114
2 0-14
114
1 0-28
0-02
115
CartTrack
0-03
106
0-18
107
0-08
2
108
0-16
1
108
9-15 Maidanahalli
0-13
49
Nala
0-02
196
0-14
44
1 0-13
43
2 0-07
Road
0--01
43
1 0-15
208
1 0-13 Kuragahalli
208
0-17
2
208
3 0-02
207
0-27
96
P 0-39
202
0-14
201
0-26
200
0-25
198
0-19
113
0-08
Nala
0-04
114
1 0-27
124
2 0-12
124
3 0-17 CartTrack
0-03
117
3 0-18
117
2 0-08
Nala
0-09
156
0-15
155
0-23
154
0-07
151
0-21
149
0-17
148
0-24
146
1 0-13
145
0-14
0-25
142
Nala
005
141
1 0-19 4313 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
2
3
4
1
5
2
3
4
1
5
Canal
0-09 141
2 0-11 Nanjangud Debur
Kuragahalli
Mysore
0-05
Road
0-03
Nala
2-00
P
411
0-08
433
Hebbalu
400
0-15
0-26
1
434
0-06
2B
401
2A 0-02
3
401
2A 0-13 3
1 0-02
402
Maraluru
390
0-02
Nanjangud
170-10
402
392
0-17
402
238
0-34
34 } 3
402
403
0-24
403
0-12 244
404
1 0-13 244
0-34
404
0-11
Pl P2 }
2 244
P3
0-06
Road
243
0-02
405
0-02
0-22
434
385
0-14 433
0-06
383
2B 0-03 Road
0-03
0-18
383
2A 271
1 0-01
0-06
383
3A
0-08
CartTrack
2 0-08
384
270
0-01
IB
0-08
381
1A 270
0-14
IA
0-08
381
IB 270
2 0-14
IC 0-08
381
0-04
Canal
2 0-12
381
268
1 0-19
0-04
Road
2
268
0-14
0-03
379
1 267
1 0-02
0-06
379
2 267
2 0-25
378
2 0-08 303
1 0-09
378
0-13
1 Nala
0-08
376
0-10 305
0-18
373
2 0-09 306
(0-29
373
3 0-01
005
Cart Track
374
0-04
1
0-32
315
0-12
374
2
0-06
311
0-10
371
1
0-27
313
0-11
371
2
(0-19
312
369
3A 0-09
0-07
Canal
369
009
3B 35
0-03
369
2 0-01 34
0-07
0-03
368
2 33
2 (0-18
368
0-08
1
(-15
32
364
0-24
1
0-13
River
2
364
(0-15
Debur Kapila River
3
364
429
001
3A 0-07
0-18
438
0-06
363
2
0-06
440
0-10
363
1 439
00-28
357
3 436
0-23
0-06
357
4 0-02 435
355
2 0-02 435
1001 2 J
0-14
Nala
431
0-08
IA
303
1 0-05 431
2A 0-07 4314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Debur
303
2
212
6 001 Nanjangud
009
Karlapura
Nanjangud
3
303
211
009
0-21
Kalale
91
304
0-18
0-18
641
Canal
0-02
0-06
89
308
1
0-10 308
90
20-11
0-18 307
92
2
0-08
0-03
93
0-06 307
3 0-14
307
4
CartTrack
0-03
0-04
102
0-10 309
2 0-17
101
3 310
0-07
001
101
312
4 0-10
0-08
101
2 311
0-19
1A 0-05
101
2
IB 0-06 311
009
107
0-07
2 311
3A 005
0-22
106
311
0-06
3B1
129
0-17 314
1 0-06
130
0-02 314
2 0-12
132
315
001
IB 0-24
131
0-14 315
001
1A
2
2 0-06 112
0-17
Karlapura
134
2 0-33 Canal
0-04
0-06
151
1 111
1 0-15
0-07 110
1 0-26
Road (NH-21 )
152
0-26
2
110
0-01
159
0-23 114 2A1 0-05
160
1 0-02 121
1 0-27
160
2A 0-07 Road
0-04
160
2B 0-08 122
0-12
158
0-31
1 Nala
0-04
0-17
157
175
0-01
0-07
165
IA 174
1-06
165
2 173
0-20
1 0-23
167
0-27 173
2 0-05
168
2 0-02 Canal
0-04
Nala
0-03 CartTrack
0-03
222 1C3 0-15 190
1 0-19
001
221 2A1
2
190
0-17
222
191
3A 0-03
0-14
220
192 2B
1A1 0-02
0-11
220
192 2A
2A1 0-02
0-13
219
216
2A1 005
0-19
219
214
1A1 0-04
0-08
1
219 1A2 001 214
2 001
218
IE 0-06
001
209 1A
218
ID 0-02 209
1B 0-01
209
218
1A 0-11
0-03
2
218
209
3
2 0-06
0-09
0-26 Road
210
0-02
Road
Nala
0-03
0-22
211
212
4
IB1 0-02
0-12
211
212
5 0-17
2A1 0-05 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
211
2B
Kalale-Contd.
0-13 Nanjangud
4315 2
3
4
5
Canal
0-05
Nanjangud
212
1A 0-04
212
IB 0-05
212
2 0-18
284
1 0-04
2
284
0-14
284
3 0-05
208
0-01
171
1 0-02 Uppenahalli
172
1 0-18
172
2B 0-14
172
2C 0-05
173
1A 0-11
173
2A 0-10
Canal
0-02
156
1 0-19
155
0-10
2A1
155 2B1 0-15
Cart Track
0-03
130
1 0-06
Canal
0-02
131
2 0-13
131
1A 0-03
131
1B 0-11
132 1A 0-03
132
IB 0-11
132 1C1 0-12
132 1C2 009
127 1A5 0-02
135
2 0-01
135
1 0-24
136
1 0-04
Road
0-03
Canal
0-02
3 0-05
106
105
0-17
104
1 0-07
104
2 0-10
103
2 0-01
103
1 0-13
Cart Track
0-03
95
Shinduvalli
2-15
Canal
0-05
105
1-23
213
0-09
212
1 0-13
212
2 0-04
211
6 0-01
211
7 0-04
211
8 0-08
209 3A 0-09
209
2 0-12 Shinduvalli
-Contd.
201
0-09
2
0-17
201
1
207
0-09
205
0-14
Canal
0-08
206
0-20
204
2 0-05
Road
0-03
275
1 0-08
275
2 0-22
275
4 0-03
284
0-23
285
0-03
1
283
1 0-18
2A 0-17
283
283
2B 0-05
286
0-19
287
1 0-17
294
1-02 CartTrack
0-02
289
1-02
472
2 0-02
461
1 0-15
2 0-14
292
475
0-16
Nala
0-04
556
Hedatale
0-07
554
0-21
536
1 0-09
536
2 0-07
536
3 009 Cart Track
0-03
532
1 0-14
532
3 0-21
532
2 0-11
1
531
0-01
223
Kummarahalli
0-10
224
0-24
0-04 CartTrack
226
1A 0-08
226
2 0-01
226
1B 0-10
226
3 0-02
226
4 0-03
226
5 0-05
227
2 0-21
0-09
228
1
0-12
228
2
238
2 0-17
238
1 0-03
239
1 0-09 4316
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
3
4
2
5
2
4
5
1
3
0-03
Road
239
0-06
2
Nanjangud
Hemmaragala
Nanjangud Kummarahalli
62
0-28 -Contd.
239
3 0-12
61
0-16 240
2 0-03
92
0-04
Hampapura
240
3 0-10
0-02
Road
4 0-15
240
91
1 0-12 Road
0-03
2
91
0-01
0-26
241
1 0-06
90
CartTrack
0-02
90
2 0-04
0-27
5
1
3 0-03
90
5
2A 0-05
4
90
0-11 5
2B 0-07
0-01
89
2
0-07
12
1
0-13
13
1 11
0-12
3 0-14
13
0-26
1
10
0-03
Road
41
0--32
0-09
250
0-03
40
4
0-02
248
1
0-06
Cart Track
0-03
248
2 26
0-03
3
248
3 0-03 26
4 0-08
4 0-04
248
5 0-10
247
0-03
IB 33
1 0-01
247
1A 0-03 32
0-10
1
0-02
IC
247
2 0-08
32
0-01
247
2 32
6 0-11
0-05
247
3
2
34
0-13
246
1 0-04 35
0-23
246
2 0-04 58
0-07
2
246
0-07
3 59
0-05
1
1 0-04
245
60
0-11
1
0-02
245
2
2 0-02
57
245
3 0-03 57
3 0-06
4 0-02
245
0-04
Nala
5
245
001
0-16
184
3
Hemmaragala
255
0-04 185
0-02
256
1 (-19 Road
0-02
256
2 0-04 183
0-06
(-15
257
71
0-01
7A
258
0-05
1 71
7B 0-03
258
2 71
8 0-14
0-06
259
1 0-02
9
71
0-03
259
2 0-05 73
1 0-01
259
3 0-01 73
0-27
2
260
(-14 79
1 0-16
261
()-11 79
0-08
3
266
79
2A 0-02
0-06
267
()-17 78
0-05
1A2
268
1 81
1 0-13
0-01
0-03
Nala
81
3 0-06
Nerle
417
2A 0-05 81
4 0-10
417
2B 0-04 82
0-07
417
()-12
2C 83
1 0-09
415
1 (0-10 84
0-26 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4317
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
415
2 0-08 Nanjangud Nerle
2
3
5
4
26
0-32 Gattevadi
Nanjangud
415
3 0-14
414
0-07
413
0-06
411
2B 0-14
411 2A2 0-01
411 2A1 0-05
411 1A1 0-12
408
2 0-11
408
0-07
3
407
1 0-15
407
3 0-11
406
0-10
1
394
0-22
Nala
0-19
395
0-31
396
0-15
398
0-02
Nala
0-07
310
0-01
309
0-16
307
0-15
306
1 0-04
305
P 0-16
289
0-01
290
0-29
292
1 0-05
292
3 0-01
CartTrack
0-06
291
0-12
232
4 0-15
232
5 0-02
Road
0-02
229
1 0-07
229
3 0-01
Kodi
0-13
229
0-03
2
227
1 0-10
228
2 0-01
227
2 0-13
228
1 0-15
Road
0-02
219
0-18
220
0-16
41
Gattevadi
1-04
CartTrack
0-03
22
0-25
2
29
0-11
28
0-17
27
2 0-05
27
3 0-30
Nala
0-04
291
0-12
Road
0-07
290
0-14 CartTrack
0-03
270
170-16
270
25
0-05
Road
268
0-31 Cart Track
0-03
267
2 0-04
265
0-29
2
259
0-22
Road
0-04
258
2 0-18
256
2 0-05
257
1 0-01
256
3 0-15
Nala
255
0-31
254
1 0-03
252
0-01
253
1 0-08
253
2 0-07
253
3 0-07 CartTrack
0-03
251
IB 0-05
251
0-09
1A
249
1 0-21 CartTrack
0-22
249
2A 0-05
249
2B 0-03
249
3 0-01
214
1 0-01
214 2A10-09
214 2B J
215
0-27
216
2 0-01
217
1A 0-17
217
IB
217
2A
217
2B
218
2 0-08
219
1A 0-15
219
IB
219
2A
219 2B1
219
2B1
220
2 0-01
220
1 0-22 [F. No. L - 14014/ 11 /03 -G.P. (Part -1 ) ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 4318
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)]
1
नई दिल्ली , 9 जून, 2003
3 4
5
श्रीरंगपट्टण बस्तिपुरा
2-00
64 रास्ता
0-07 का.आ. 1683.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि कर्नाटक राज्य में मंगलूर से बेंगलूर तक एलपीजी गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
6
0-14
7
0-05
33
0-01
39
कुप्पेदड पुरा
0-11
1
1 0-08
1
2 0-15 और , केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
2
P 0-25
42
P 0-29
36
1 0-34
43
0-01
34
0-22 अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
नाला
0-06
अणगहल्लि
0-08
0-35
P1 P2
नाला 20 20 22
0-21
रास्ता
0-04
23
0-24
P1
23
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उसतारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाये जाने के सम्बन्ध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सं. 21 , पैलेस रोड, बेंगलूर -560 052 ( कर्नाटक ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
P2
23
अनुसूची
30
0-12 राज्य: कर्नाटक
जिला: मंड्य
29
P1 0-26 ग्राम का नाम
तालुक नाम
सर्वे सं.
क्षेत्रफल
29
P2
29
P3 भाग/हिस्सा सं. एकड़- गुन्टा
(यदि कोई हो)
24
2ए 0-01 1
2
3
4
5
27
2 0-14
27
श्रीरंगपट्टण
0-15 नाला
1बी बस्तिपुरा
0-18
98
19
0-18
3 0-04
96
1 20
0-05
8 0-03
94
P1 1-05 19 2बी 0-05
94
P2 19
0-04
2ए
नाला
0-17 19
IP1 0-14
50
0-15 19
1P2
91
1 0-14 12
2 0-01
2
91
0-01 18
001
90
P1 0-35 12
1 0-16
90
P2 13
PI) 0-14
P3
90
13
P2
13
P3
[फा. सं. एल-14014/ 11/03/जी. पी. ( भाग-1 ) ] 11
3 0-18
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 10
PI (0-27
New Delhi , the 9th June , 2003
10
P
10
P2
9
0-10
S.O. 1683. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of LPG from Mangalore to Bangalore [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1 pipeline project in the State of Karnataka , a pipeline should be laidby the GAIL ( India) Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification .
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Goverriment hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, No. 21 , Palace Road , Bangalore -560 052 (Karnataka).
SCHEDULE
State : KARNATAKA
District: MANDYA
Sy. No. Hissa ' Extent Name of the Taluk
No. A-G Name of theVillage
1
4
3
5 2
Nala
0-18 Srirangapatna Bastipura
19
3 0-04
20
8 0-03
19
2B 0-05
19
2A 0-04
19
0-14
1P1)
19 1P2
12
2 0-01
18
0-01
1 0-16
12
13
P1) 0-14
13
P2
13
P3
11
3 0-18
10
Pl 0-27
10
P
P2
10
9
0-10
64
2-00
Road
0-07
6
0-14
0-05
7
33
0-01 Kuppedada
39
Pura
0-11
1
1 0-08 1590 GI/2003-7
4319 2
3
4
5
2
1
0-15
Srirangapatna Bastipura
2
P 0-25
42
P 0-29
36
1 0-34
43
0-01
34
0-22
Nala
0-06
Nala
0-08 Anagahalli
20
0-35
Pl
20 P2
22
0-21
Road
0-04
23
P1 0-24
23
P2
23
P3
30
0-12
29
P1 0-26
29
P2
29 P3
24 2A 0-01
27
0-14
2
27
IB 0-15
98
0-18
96
1 0-05
94
1-05
P1
94
P2
Nala
0-17
50
0-15
1
91
0-14
91
2 0-01
90
P10-35
90
P2
90
P3
[File No. L- 14014/ 11 /03 -G.P. (Part - 1) ]
SWAMI SINGH , Director नईदिल्ली, 9 जून, 2003
का. आ. 1684.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होताहै कि कर्नाटक राज्य में मंगलूर से बेंगलूर तक एलपीजी गैस के परिवहनके लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
जाए; और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और स्खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिधि , 1962 ( 1962 4320
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
चामराजनगर का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के सम्बन्ध में , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, सं. 21 , पैलेस रोड़, बेंगलूर -560052( कर्नाटक ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य: कर्नाटक
जिला: चामराजनगर
तालूका का नाम ग्राम का नाम सर्वे सं. भाग/ हिस्सा क्षेत्रफल
सं.
एकड़- गुन्टा
(यदि कोई हो)
1
2
3
4 5
चामराजनगर
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-03
भुजगनपुर
89
2 0-10
89
1 0-23
90
4 0-10
90
3 0-08
90
2 0-09
90
1बि 0-04
90
0-10
1ए
91
1 0-15
2
91
0-03
0-14
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
74
1बि 0-01
74
1सि 0-04
72
0-17
69
P 1-10
100
0-20
67
1-00
68
0-20
54
0-10
233
केरेहल्लि
1 0-13
233
2 0-01
65
2 0-36
64
0-01
1
66
4 0-04
35
P 0-26
66
2 0-08
66
1 0-01
60 4 0-10
68
0-01
60
3 0-10
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2
3
4
5 केरेहल्लि
60
2ए 0-04
60 2बि 0-06
60
1ए 0-09
60 1बि 0-01
222
2 0-13
222
3 0-19
69
0-20
नाला
0-03
रास्ता
0-05
71
0-18
72
0-22 बेंडरवाडि
285
0-25
284
0-13
नाला
0-02
283
1 0-17
282
2 0-04
282
1 0-03
283
2 0-10
283
3 0-05
263
2 0-01
263
3 0-06
263
4 0-03
263
5 0-01
264
1 0-03
264
2ए 0-12
264 2बि 0-01
265
2 0-01
265
1 0-04
260
0-06
नाला
0-06
245
3 0-15
244 2बि 0-08
246
3 0-01
244
1 0-18 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-06
129
0-06
130
2 0-27
130
1बि 0-10
130
1ए 0-05
रास्ता
0-05
131
3 0-08
137
0-07
136
1 0-08
136 2बि 0-19
136
2ए 0-02 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
3
4
5
2
1
0-25
चामराजनगर
135
बेंडरवाडि
चामराजनगर
142
0-08
224
1-03
001
143
0-12
323
0-03
नाला
324
001
81
नंजहल्लि
0-25
78
45
0-20
46
0-09
98
0-15
97
0-02
0-06
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
0-02
93
7
0-14
6
0-13
0-20
4
0-06
9
0-18
10
0-17
13
0-04
बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
2 005
72
0-24
72
1
70
2 0-02
0-04
71
70
0-21
1
009
69
0-02
59
1
0-24
60
1 001
61
2
61
0-14
3 0-18
61
005
रास्ता
मुत्तिगे
0-21
271
2 0-08
274
1
273
0-11
0-11
273
2
2-05
256
0-34
231
0-12
235
2
0-21
2
237
0-13
1
237
1 0-10
238
2 0-09
238
0-12
1
468
4321
4
2
5
3
468
2 0-12 मुत्तिगे
468
3 0-15
468
4 0-02
001
469
2
0-10
नाला
497
0-28
0-02
470
003
239
P
0-11
474
475
0-23
0-30
240
1
0-07
403
गोविन्दवाडि
P 1-36
404
0-25
501
1
502
0-24
1 0-16
401
001
401
3ए
0-25
501
0-24
502
1
1 0-16
401
001
401
3ए
401 3बि 0-04
520
0-02
0-10
521
001
397
2-08 बंजर भूमि
0-10
538
539
0-02
0-17
3
495
2
445
0-35
1 0-05
446
2 001
444
0-09
444
3
4 0-15
444
442
3ए 0-09
007
1
442
2
442
0-15
1 0-11
441
0-16
2
441
0-17
440
0-01
407
0-09
438
0-18
0-16
435
436
0-02
429
1ए 0-01 4322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 चामराजनगर
428
गोविन्दवाडि
1 0-16
चामराजनगर जारी
428
2ए 0-09
428 2बि 0-13
427
3 0-01
रास्ता
0-03
39
1 001
1
41
0-18
2 0-03
41
40
1 0-11
40
2 0-18
45
0-22
46
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5
9
1 001 सोमनपुर
0-12 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
112
1 0-01
112
2 0-10
112
3 0-10
113
0-18
2ए
113
0-07
1
115
2 0-04
115
1 0-35
116
1 0-10
0-08 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
1बि 0-14
0-01
46
1 ए
47
0-17
48
0-12
90
0-16
कालनहुंडि
88
0-03
87
0-16
1ए2
0-13
87 1ए 1
87
0-04
1बि
86
0-10
1
रास्ता
0-05
2
86
0-22
85
0-16
83
1 0-15
83
001
2
79
1 0-22
79
2 0-05
80
0-26
74
2 0-12
75
0-19
76
1 0-24
2
76
0-18
54
0-02
53
1 0-25
52
0-20
0-04
सोमनपुर बैलगाड़ी रास्ता.
17
0-21
13
0-22
0-01
157
12
0-30
11
0-06
2ए
11
0-08
2बि
11
0-14
1
10
0-14
97
1 0-03
97
0-10
2ए
97 2बि 0-12
0-18
118
95
0-01
94
0-36
93
0-16
0-03 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
20
0-05 वीरनपुर
1ए
22
2 0-27
22
1 0-03
21
1 0-03
21
0-12
2ए
21
0-22
2बि1
0-30
11
10
पी 0-29
9
0-02
2बि
0-02 बैलगाड़ी रास्ता
3
0-26
4
0-24
2
43
0-16
44
0-11
रास्ता
0-02
51
0-32
2 0-10
53
53
1 0-07
0-04
नाला
49
0-16
225
0-09
226
0-30
290
0-14
80
0-35
291
0-03
रास्ता
0-07 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
3
4
5
I 2
1
2
232
0-03 चामराजनगर ( जारी ) वीरनपुर (जारी )
4323
4
2
3
5
0-25
43
सोमसमुद्र मजरे
चामराजनगर (जारी )
2
230
0-05
0-30
2
231
1 0-02
231
233
1 0-31
2 0-04
233
235
1 0-22
0-23
235
2
0-22
281
87
2-03
4-19
101
शिवपुर
0-20
2
146
0-27
237
पी 3-17
51
बडगलपुर
99
1-04
0-18
103
0-21
52
2
0-24
2
53
0-18
सरकारी भूमि
0-03
रास्ता
0-28
92
0-05
38
2
0-23
37
36
0-34
0-05
नाला
0-29
43
0-04
रास्ता
2
44
0-13
0-12
1
44
0-15
45
0-06
46
47
1-32 सोमसमुद्र
मजरे
0-16
31
साणेगल
0-04
29
0-18
नाला
0-34
32
0-02
2
33
0-18
34
1 0-01
33
39
1 0-13
0-20
39
2
1-04
46
पी
001
रास्ता
42
0-18
0-20
44
साणेगल (जारी )
001
नाला
0-06 अमचवाडि
नाला
5-24
445
0-16
455
0-28
454
2 0-03
453
0-16
3
453
2 0-13
446
1 0-11
446
1 0-08
447
0-25
1
448
0-23
2
448
0-01
430
0-02
449
1-04
429
0-10
428
पी
0-07
427
2-28
78
होनहल्लि
0-17
125
1 001
139
0-14
138
1
2 0-22
138
124
1 009
0-04
145
1ए
0-05
145
2
1-07
150
0-18
151
0-19
136
0-20
3
123
0-05
रास्ता
0-14
77
1
76
1 0-23
001
2
76
0-13
75
1
2 0-13
75
74
0-09
3-30
17
यलचगेरे
0-05
नाला
0-02
128
2ए
वड्ङ्गलपुर
0-22
129
1
0-30
213
0-21
212
5-38
166
180
1 0-02 4324
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
2
180
0-26
वङ्गलपुर
IC 0-04
74
179
0-12
2ए2
Chamarajanagar (Contd.)
72
0-17
Bhujaganapura (Contd.)
179
69
2ए1 0-12
P 1-10 179
1 0-03
100
0-20 260
001
67
1-00
68
0-20 [फा. सं . एल -14014/11/03 /जी. पी. ( भाग -1 ) ]
54
0-10
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
Kerehalli
233
1 0-13 New Delhi, the 9th June , 2003
233
2 0-01
65
2 0-36
64
1 0-01
66
4 0-04 S.O. 1684.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of LPG from Mangalore to Bangalore pipeline project in the State of Karnataka, a pipeline should be laid by GAIL (India) Limited.
35
P 0-26
66
2 0-08
66
1 0-01
4
60
0-10
68
0-01 And whereas , it appears, to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
60
3 0-10
2A
60
0-04
60
2B 0-06
60
1A 0-09 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
60
IB 0-01
222
2 0-13
222
3 0-19
69
0-20
Canal
0-03
Road
0-05
71
0-18 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority , GAIL ( India) Limited, No. 21 , Palace Road , Bangalore - 560 052 (Karnataka) .
72
0-22 SCHEDULE
Bendaravadi 285
0-25 State: KARNATAKA District : CHAMARAJANAGAR
284
0-13 Sy. No.
Extent
Nala
0-02 Name of the Taluk
Hissa No.
Name of the Village
A-G
283
1 0-17 1
2
3 4
5
282
2 0-04
0-03
282
Chamarajanagar Bhujaganapura Cart Track
1 0-03 89
2 0-10
283
2 0-10 89
1 0-23
283
3 0-05 90
4 0-10
263
2 001 90
3 0-08
263
3 0-06 90
2 0-09
263
4 0-03 90
1B 0-04
263
5 0-01 90 IA 0-10
264
1 0-03 91
1 0-15
264 2A 0-12 91
2 0-03
264
2B 0-01 Cart Track
0-14
265
2 0-01 74
IB 0-01
265
1 0-04 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4325 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 260
0-06
61
1 001 Nala
Chamarajanagar (Contd.)
Bendaravadi (Contd.)
61
2 0-14
Chamarajanagar
(Contd.)
Nanjahalli (Contd.)
0-06
245
3 0-15
61
3 0-18 244
2B 0-08
0-05
Road
Muthige
246
3 0-01
271
0-21 244
0-18
1
274
0-08
2 CartTrack
0-06
273
1 0-11 129
0-06
273
2 0-11 130
2 0-27
256
2-05 130
IB 0-10
231
0-34 130
1A 005
235
2 0-12 Road
005
237
2 0-21 131
3 0-08
237
1 0-13 137
0-07
238
1 0-10 136
1 0-08
238
2 0-09 136
2B 0-19
468
1 0-12 136 2A 0-02
468
0-12
2 135
0-25
468
3 0-15 142
0-08
468
4 0-02 224
1-03
469
2 001 143
001
Nala
0-10 323
0-12
497
0-28
0-03
Nala
470
0-02 324
239
0-03
P 81
474
0-01
0-11 Nanjahalli
78
0-25
475
0-23 45
0-20
240
0-30
1 46
0-09
Govindavadi 403
0-07
0-15
404
98
1-36
P 97
0-02
501
0-25
0-06
CartTrack
502
0-24
1
0-02
93
1 0-16
401
0-14
7
401
001
3A 6
0-13
501
0-25 4
0-20
502
1 0-24 9
0-06
401
1 0-16 10
0-18
401
3A 001 13
0-17
401
3B 0-04 CartTrack
0-04
520
0-02 72
2 0-05
521
0-10 72
0-24
1
397
001 70
2 0-02
Barren Land
2-08 71
0-04
538
0-10 70
0-21
539
1
0-02 69
0-09
495
3 0-17
445
0-02
59
1
2 0-35 60
0-24
446
1 0-05 4326
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
4
3
5
1
2
3
4
5 444
2 0-01
Chamarajanagar Govindavadi
76
2 0-18
Chamarajanagar Kalanahundi
444
3 0-09
(Contd.)
54
(Contd.)
0-02 444
4 0-15
53
1 0-25 442
3A 0-09
52
0-20 442
1 0-07
0-04
Somanapura Cart Track
442
2 0-15
17
0-21 441
1 0-11
13
0-22 441
2 0-16
157
0-01 440
0-17
12
0-30 407
0-01
11
2A 0-06 Nala
0-09
11
2B 0-08 438
0-18
11
1 0-14.
435
0-16
10
0-14 436
0-02
9
1 001 429
1A 0-01
CartTrack
0-12 428
1 0-16
112
1 0-01 428
2A 0-09
112
2 0-10 428
2B 0-13
112
3 0-10 427
3 0-01
113 2A 0-18 Road
0-03
113
1 0-07 39
1 0-01
115
2 0-04 41
1 0-18
1
115
0-35 41
2 0-03
116
1 0-10 40
1 0-11
CartTrack
0-08
2 0-18
97
40
1 0-03 45
0-22
97
2A 0-10
IB 0-14
97
2B 0-12 46
IA 0-01
118
46
0-18 47
0-17
95
0--01 48
0-12
94
0-36 Kalanahundi
90
0-16
93
0-16 88
0-03
CartTrack
0-03 87
1A2 0-16
0-05
IA
Veeranapura 20
87 1A1 0-13
22
2 0-27 87
IB 0-04
22
1 0-03 86
1 0-10
21
1 0-03 Road
0-05
21
2A 0-12 86
2 0-22
21 2B1 0-22 85
0-16
11
0-30 83
0-15
1
P
10
0-29 83
2 0-01
9
2B 0-02 79
1 0-22
CartTrack
0-02 79
2 0-05
3
0-26
0-26
80
4
0-24 74
2 0-12
43
2 0-16 75
0-19
44
0-11 76
0-24
1
Road
0-02 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4
3
5 2
1 1
0-32
51
4327
3
4
5 2
0-18
Nala
Chamarajanagar
Chamarajanagar Veeranapura
53
2 0-10 (Contd.)
53
1 0-07
0-04
Nala
49
0-16
225
0-09
226
0-30
290
0-14
80
0-35
291
0-03
0-07
Road
0-03
232
2
0-05
2
230
231
2 0-30
231
1 0-02
1 0-31
233
0-04
233-
2
1
235
0-22
235
0-23
2
0-22
281
87
2-03
4-19
101
Shivapura
2 0-20
146
237
0-27
P 3-17 Badagalapura 51
99
1-04
103
0-18
52
2 0-21
2 0-24
53
0-18
Govt. land
0-03
Road
92
0-28
38
2 0-05
37
0-23
36
0-34
0-05
Nala
43
0-29
Road
0-04
44
0-13
2
1 0-12
44
45
0-15
46
0-06
47
1-32 Somasamudra
Majare
0-16
31
Sanigal
0-04
29
1590 GI /2003-8
32
0-34
0-02
33
2
Somasamudra MajareSanigal (Contd.)
0-18
34
33
0-01
1
39
0-13
1
0-20
2
39
1-04
46.
P
Road
0-01
0-18
42
0-25
43
44
0-20
0-01
Nala
0-06
Nala
Amachavady
445
5-24
0-16
455
0-28
454
453
2 0-03
3 0-16
453
446
2 0-13
446
0-11
1
1 0-08
447
0-25
448
1
0-23
448
2
0-01
430
0-02
449
429
1-04
0-10
428
P
0-07
427
78
2-28 Honnahalli
0-17
125
0-01
139
1
138
1 0-14
0-22
2
138
0-09
1
124
145
0-04
1A
0-05
2
145
1-07
150
0-18
151
0-19
136
0-20
3
123
0-05
Road
1. 0-14
0-23
76
1
76
0-01
2
0-13
1
75
75
2 0-13
0-09
74 4328
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 17
3-30
Chamarajanagar Yalachagere
कृष्णा मन्डवल्लि
487 भाग
पेरिकेगूडेम
0.1640 Nala
0-05
488 भाग 0.1480 128
2A
Vadgalpura
0-02
591-बी भाग 0.0560 129
1 0-22
213
596 भाग
0-30
0.0480 212
0-21
0.6640
कुल 166
5-38
[फा. सं. एल-14014/21/2003/जी. पी. ] 180
1 0-02
180
2 0-26
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 179 2A2 0-12
New Delhi , the 9th June , 2003
179 2A1 0-12
179
1 0-03
260
0-01
[F. No. L- 14014/11/2003 - G.P. (Part -1 ) ]
SWAMI SINGH , Director
नई दिल्ली, 9 जून , 2003
S.O. 1685. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from M/s. Vennar Ceramics to M/s . Vijaya Durga Industries located at Perikegudem village of Mandavalli Mandal of Krishna District in Andhra Pradesh State , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
And, whereas , it appears , to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
का. आ. 1685.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में कृष्णा जिले के मंडवल्ली मण्डल के ग्राम पेरिकेगुडेम अब स्थित मैसर्स वेन्नार सेरामिक्स से मैसर्स विजया दुर्गा इन्डस्ट्रीज तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा ; एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है; '
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority , GAIL ( India ) Limited, K. G. Basin Project , Jetty Avenue , Danavaipeta , Rajahmundry - 533103 , Andhra Pradesh.
SCHEDULE
District Mandal
Area
Village
Survey No.
1
2
3
4
5
445 Part
Krishna Mandavalli Perikigudem
0.0200
0.0720
446 Part कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाये जाने के सम्बन्ध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, के. जी. बेसिन परियोजना, जेट्टी एवेन्यू, दानावैपेटा, राजामुन्द्री 533103 , आन्ध्र प्रदेश को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
447 Part 0.1560
487 Part 0.1640 अनुसूची
488 Part 0.1480 जिला
मण्डल
गाँव
सर्वे नं. क्षेत्रफल
591-B Part 0.0560 1
2
3
4
5
596 Part 0.0480 मन्डवल्लि
कृष्णा
0.0200
पेरिकेगूडेम 445 भाग
Total 0.6640 446भाग 0.0720
[F. No. L - 14014/21/ 2003 -G.P. ] 447 भाग 0.1560
SWAMI SINGH, Director 4329
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
2
3
1
नई दिल्ली, 9 जून , 2003
00-05-70
322/1
बडौदा 3धनोरा
बडौदा
00-27-15
322/10/1
00-17-65
276
00-15-05
275/2
का०आ० 1686.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में, गेल ( आईपीसीएल टर्मिनल ) से गेल अन्डेरा ) तक पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल (इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
00-10-95
274
00-09-30
272
00-20-75
271
00-01-20
कारट्रेक
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
00-23-30
242/1
00-14-40
249/पैकी
00-06-40
250
00-02-05
मेटलरोड
00-20-60
210
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमिमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
00-09-10
210/2
00-14-70
211/1
00-15-65
209
00-00-15
कारट्रेक
00-11-50
208
00-09-80
193
00-16-80
129
00-15-40 कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे. पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, आर.सी. दत्त रोड, अल्कापुरी , वडोदरा -390005 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
130
00-14-40
125
अनुसूची
कारट्रेक
सर्वे नंबर
गाँव
तहसील
जिला
00-24-85
121
123/पैकी
00-03-75
120
उ.का.अ. के लिएअर्जितकी जाने वाली भूमि (हेक्टेयरमें)
00-01-20
कारट्रेक
5
4
3
2
1
00-16-15
118
00-01-42
बडौदा (1) करचीया 356/2
बडौदा
03-47-95
कुल
355/1
00-04-35
1079/2
कोयली
रोड
00-03-35
1079/3
363
00-17-50
1080
00-02-09
कुल
00-25-20
कुल
00-00-92
913 /पैकी/ 1
(2) रनोली
[फा. सं. एल-14014/19/03- जी.पी. ]
00-00-62
912
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
00-00-38
911
New Delhi , the 9th June , 2003
00-00-74
910
00-00-13
मेटल-रोड
00-02-32
मेटल-रोड
00-00-43
रेलवे
S.O. 1686.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum gas from GAIL ( IPCL Terminal ) to GAIL Undera) in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline shouldbe laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
663
00-00-86
661
00-08-40
वीबीएम- रोड
जीआईडीसी
00-15-26
" ओ"रोड
Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposedto be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to the notification; 728/6 पैकी 2
01-55-40
बीबत्ता के
01-85-76
कुल
00-15-40
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein. 332/8
(3) धनोरा 4330
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3
4
5
Dhanora 208
00-11-50
193
00-09-80
129
00-16-80
130
00-15-40
125
00-14-40 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one day from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - sec. tion ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India ) Limited, R.C. Dutt Road, Alkapuri , Vadodara - 390 005 (Gujarat ) .
Cart-Track 00-00-60 SCHEDULE
121
00-24-85 Dist. Tehsil
123/p
Village
120
00-03-75 Survey No. BlockNo.
Cart-Track 00-01-20
118
Land to be acquiredfor R.O.U. in Hectares
00-16-15 1
2
Total
03-47-95 3
4
5
1079/2
00-04-35
Koyli
356/2
00-01-42
Vadodara Vadodara (1 )
1079/3
00-03-35 Karachiya
1080
00-17-50 355/1
Total
00-25-20 Road
363
[F. No. L- 14014/ 19/03 - G.P. ] Total
00-02-09
SWAMI SINGH, Director
00-00-92
(2)Ranoli 913/p/ 1
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
912
00-00-62
911
00-00-38
910
00-00-74
Mattel-Road 00-00-13
का०आ ० 1687.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में , दहेज- वेमार-विजयपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
Mattel-Road 00-02-32
00-00-43
Railway
663
661
00-00-86
WBM -Road 00-08-40
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
GIDC'O'
Road
00-15-26
728/6(B+K)
01-55-40
p/2
Total
01-85-76
332/8
(3)
00 15-40
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग केअधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
Dhanora 322/1
00-05-70
322/10/1 00-27-15
276
00-17-65
275/2
00-15-05
274
00-10-95
272
00-09-30
271
00-20-75
Cart-Track 00-01-20
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारतके राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्धकरा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपत्नाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, गेल , कॉम्पलैक्स, जिला- गुना, विजयपुर -473 112 को लिखित रूप्र में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
242/1
00-23-30
अनुसूची
00-14-40
249/p
जिला तहसील गांव सर्वे नंबर
250
अर्जितक्षेत्रफल
00-06-40
(हेक्टेयर में) Mattel -Road 00-02-05
210
1
2
00-20-60
3
4
5 210/2
00-09-10
उज्जैन तराना सामानेरा 336
0.06 211/1
00-14-70
503
0.03 209
00-15-65
504
0.18 Cart-Track 00-00-15
506
0.15 4331
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0.01
611
हरनावदा
बडनगर
उज्जैन
0.19
0.02 508
606
सामानेरा
तराना
उज्जैन
0.02
0.01
555
509
0.02
0.15
554
512
0.02
0.07 852
कुल
0.79
0.06 कुल
212
जियाजीगढ़
नागदा
0.27
0.06
001
197
चूनाखेड़ी
0.33
0.23
018
कुल
0.17
021
0.03
520
सुरजाखेड़ी
0.06
022
0.02
521
0.04
0.01 030
522
0.10
0.06 032
कुल
0.04
060
0.04
411
घटिया गुढ़ा
0.70
0.48 कुल
412
0.01
0.03 001
413
डाबड़ा
0.55
0.03
002
कुल
राजपूत
0.05
003
[फा. सं. एल-14014/19/02- जी.पी. ( भाग- II ) ]
0.09
कुल
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
0.02
लालाखेड़ी 311
New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
0.02
312
0.01
313
0.05
कुल
0.04
बडनगर मुरारखेड़ी 001
S.O. 1687. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej -Vemar- Vijaipur pipeline project in the State ofMadhya Pradesh, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
0.04
046
0.05
045
0.17
048
0.12
050
0.07
052
0.09
And,whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
054
0.58
कुल
0.04
001
खेड़ा नारायण
0.03
086
0.12
088
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
0.03
089
0.22
कुल
0.17
640
दुनालजा
0.04
641
0.27
638
0.01
621
0.49
कुल
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one- days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land tothe Competent Authority, GAIL ( India ) Limited , GAIL, Complex, Distt. Guna, Vijaipur-473 112 .
0.04
511
SCHEDULE
उड़सिंगा
0.02
512
Survey No.
Tehsil Village
District
0.05
515
0.04
516
Arca Acquired (InHect.)
0.01
5 517
4
3
2
1
0.01
471
0.06
Samanera 336
Tarana
Ujjain
0.04
290
0.03
503
0.21
0.18
504
कुल 4332
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003/JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Tarana
Ujjain
Samanera 506
0.15
555
Ujjain Badnagar Harna-
0.02 508
0.19
wada 554
0.02 509
0.01
Total
512
0.07
0.15
852
0.02
Nagda Jiyaji-
212
0.06
garh
Total
0.79
197
0.27 Chuna-
khedi 001
0.06
Total
0.33 018
0.23
0.03
520
Surjakheri
021
0.17
521
0.02 022
0.06
522
0.01 030
0.04
Total
0.06 032
0.10
Ghatia Guda 411
060
0.04
0.04
412
0.48 Total
0.70
413
0.03 Dabada 001
0.01
Rajput 002
Total
0.03
0.55 003
0.05
[F. No. L- 14014/19/02 -G.P. (Part - II) ] Total
0.09
SWAMI SINGH , Director Lalakhedi
311
0.02
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून, 2003
312
0.02
313
0.01
Total
0.05
Bad- Murari
khedi
nagar
001
0.04
का.आ. 1688.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में दहेज- वेमार-विजयपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
046
0.04
045
0.05
048
0.17
050
0.12
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
052
0.07
054
0.09
Total
0.58
Khera
0.04
001
Narayan
086
0.03
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोगके अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
088
0.12
089
0.03
Total
0.22
0.17
640
Dunalja
641
0.04
638
0.27
621
0.01
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्व है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारतके राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, गेल, काम्पलैक्स, जिला- गुना, विजयपुर-473 112 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
Total
0.49
0.04
Ursinga 511
अनुसूची
512
0.02
जिला तहसील गांव सर्वे नं.
515
0.05
516
0.04
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयरमें) 517
0.01
राजगढ़ सारंगपुर
0.17
खजूरिया 001
471
0.01
घाटा
290
0.04
008
0.07 Total
0.21
कुल
0.24 Harna-
wada 611
0.01
[फ.सं. एल-14014/19/02- जी.पी. ( भाग- II ) ] 606
0.02
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 4333 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
काम्पलैक्स, जिला- गुना, विजयपुर-473 112 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
सर्वेनं.
तहसील गांव
जिला
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) S.O. 1688. Whereas it appears to the Central Gov ernment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej -Vemar- Vijaipur pipeline project in the State of Madhya Pradesh a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
0.02
अरोलिया 043
मोहन
शाजापुर
0.02
061
बड़ोदिया
0.04
कुल
0.02
216
आगर सूतड़ा
And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is neces- sary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
0.06
217
0.08
219
0.04
220
0.08
223
0.08
224
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
0.02
236
0.08
339
0.46
कुल
[फाइल सं . एल-14014/19/02- जी.पी. ( भाग- II ) ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
Any person, interested in the land deseribed in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one-days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India ) Limited, GAIL , Complex Distt . Guna, Vijaipur-473112.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil
Distt.
Survey No.
Village
S.O. 1689. Whereas it appears to the CentralGov- ernment that it is necessary in the public interest that for thetransportation of natural gas through Dahej -Vemar- Vijaipur pipeline project in the State of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
Area Aquired (InHect.)
0.17
Sanrang- Khajuria
Rajgarh
0.07
(001 008
Ghata
pur
0,24
Total
And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is neces- sary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described inthe Schedule annexed to this notification ;
[F. No. L- 14014/ 19/02- G.P. (Part - II )]
SWAMI SINGH , Director
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून, 2003
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
का०आ० 1689.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में , दहेज- वेमार- विजयपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one-days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published inthe Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying ofthe pipeline under the land tothe Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited , GAIL, Complex Distt . Guna, Vijaipur-473 112.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil
Distt.
Survey No.
Village
Area Aquired (InHect.) अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
5
4
3
2
1
0.02
Aroliya 043
Mohan
Shajapur
Barodia
0.02
061
0.04
Total
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्व है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, गेल, 4334
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
Sutada 216
Shajapur Agar
0.02
217
0.06
219
0.08
220
0.04
223
0.08
224
0.08
1
236
0.02
339
0.08
Total
0.46
[F. No. L- 14014/19/02 -G.P. (Part - II) ]
SWAMI SINGH , Director नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
का०आ० 1690.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का०आ० 1958 तारीख, 13 मई, 2002, का ०आ० 110 ( अ ) तारीख, 07 फरवरी, 2000 , का ० आ० 735( अ ) तारीख 07 अगस्त, 2000 और का० आ० 3848 तारीख 03 दिसम्बर, 2002 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा राजस्थान राज्य में सिवर- रामचन्दपुरा स्परलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय कीघोषणा की थी;
और उक्त अधिसूचनाओं की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को क्रमशः तारीख 01 जून, 2002 , 28 फरवरी, 2000, 30 अगस्त, 2000 और 21 दिसम्बर, 2002 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उस धारा की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड मेंनिहित होगा ।
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] अनुसूची
जिला तहसील ग्राम
खसरा नं. उपयोग का अधिकारके लिएअर्जित भूमिहेक्टेयर में
2
3
4
5
सांगानेर
जयपुर
2136
मुहाना
0.0180
1978
0.0150
1979
0.0750
1974
0.0100
1455
0.0560
1971
0.1800
1962
0.0120
1957
0.0160
2038
0.0440
2107/3
0,0080
2194
0.0280
2104
0.0555
2103
0.0400
2105
0.0120
1954
0.0120
1955
0.2680
1454
0.3360
1984
0.0440
1973
0.0240
1972
0.1350
1961
0.1620
1921
0.0200
2036
0.0880
2108/3/1 0.0160
2109
0.2480
2106
0.0100
2124
0.0020
2108/3/2 0.0040
2196/2
0.1000
2220
0.0880
योग
0.9410
0.0060 फिरोजपुर 261/458
उर्फ इन्दपुरी 282/468 0.0020
271
0,0300
328
0.0020
282/469
0.0240
योग
0.0640 भांकरोटा कलां 1167 0.0540
1167/2720 0.0280
1148
0.0020
1165
0.1320
1164
0.1320
1163/2835 0.0080
1163
0.1200
1163/2817 0.0120 4335
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5
2
3
1
5
4
3
1
2
0.0600
225
बडीका बास
भांकरोटा कलां
0.0920
1160
भांकरोटा कलां
0.0720
136
0,0160
1159
0.0240
135
0.0240
1178
0.1280
134
0.0160
1179
0.1920
133
0.0240
1180
0.1280
270
0.0080
1289
0.1240
273
0.1160
0.0080
272
1288
0.0180
292
0.0280
1287
0.1040
318
0.0320
1291
0.0440
319
0.0880
1323
0.1080
322
0.0720
1329
0.1720
434
0.2080
1328
0,3760
432
0.1400
1343
0.0400
431
0.0280
1343/2810
0.0480
426/483
0.0400
1342
2.6140
योग
0.0960
1344
0.0240
श्रीराम की 488
0.0120
917
नांगल
0.1180
1166
0.1600
493
0,1400
1162
0.1080
492
0.1100
1155
0.1640
516
0,0560
0.0240 1286
512
0.0040
0,1200
898
1300
0.0360
901
0,1580
1302
0.0360
834
0,0100
1304
0.0880
464
0.0360
1303
0,0680
932
0.2600
1305
0.0800
933
0.1120
1322
0.7920
0.0520
योग
1321
0.0400
0.0930
232/830
1332
सायपुरा
0.0360
0.0160 1333
689/887
0.0040
1331
0.0560
योग
0.0310
1330
0.7600
566
मोहनपुरा
2.7560
योग
0.7600
योग
0.0560
बडी का बास 241
0.0190
792/1003
गोबिन्दपुरा
0.0560
242
बास बम्बाला
0.0400
243
0.0080
0.0190 244
योग
0.0080
229
0.0240
238/562
नृरसिंहपुरा
0.0120
274
0.0240
योग
0.0300
277
0.0160
0.1000
291
हसमपुराबास 147
0.1280
323
भांकरोटा
0,0080
324
0.0160
योग
0.0320
331
0.0120
0,0040
426
54/328
जगन्नाथपुरा
0.0200
0.0040
239
280/365
0,0200
234
0.0320
योग
0.0780
233
0.0040
श्रीरामपुराबास 14
0.0800
232
भांकरोटा
0.0760
230
0.0200
231
0.0040
योग
0,1000
226
0.0120
241/1142
शिकारपुरा
1590 GI/03-9 4336
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
939
0.0130
0.0150
Distt. Tehsil
शिकारपुरा 940/1188
Village Survey No.
योग
0.0400
3307
अजमेर अजमेर तबीजी
0.0832
Land to be Acquired for ROU in Hect.
3180
0.3356
1
2
3
4
5 3181
0.0010
0.0180 2681
2136
Jaipur Sanganer Muhana
0.2731
1978
0.0150 योग
0.6929
1979
0.0750 ककलाना 655
0.0162
1974
0.0100 योग
0.0162
1455
0,0560 पाली सोजत
877
केलवाद
0.0020
1971
0.1800 852
0,0100
1962
0.0120 849
0.0800
0.0160
1957
843
0.0240
2038
0.0440
2107/3
0.0080 योग
0.01160
2194
0.0280 [फा. सं० एल-14014/27/02- जी ०पी० ]
2104
0.0555
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
2103
0.0400 New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
2105
0.0120
1954
0.0120
1955
0.02680
1454
0.3360
0.0440
1984
1973
0.0240
1972
0.1350
1961
0.1620
1921
0.0200
2036
0.0880
2108/3/1 0.0160
2109
0.2480
2106
0.0100 S.O. 1690.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1958 , dated the 13th May, 2002, S.O. 110 (E) , dated the 7th February, 2000 , S.O. 735 (E) , dated the 7th August , 2000 and S.O. 3848, dated the 3rd December, 2000 issued under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) (hereinafter referredto as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to those notification for the purpose oflaying pipeline for the transport of liquefied petroleum gas through Siwar-Ramchandpura Spurline Project in the State of Rajasthan by the GAIL ( India) Limited ;
2124
0.0020
0.0040
2108/3/2
2196/2
0.1000
2220
0.0880 And, whcreas, copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public on the day of the Ist June 2002 , 28th day of February , 2000, 30th August , 2000 and 21st day of December , 2002 respectively ;
0.9410
Total
0,0060
FirojpurUrf 261/458
0.0020 And, whereas , the Competent Authority has under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government ;
Inder puri 282/468
271
0.0300
328
0.0020
282/469
0.0240 And, whereas , the Central Government has , after considering the said report , decided to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification;
TOTAL 0.0640
Bhankrota 1167
0,0540
Kalan
1167/2720 0.0280
0.0020
1148
1165
0.1320 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
1164
0,1320
1163/2835 10,0080
1163
0.1200
1163/2817 0.00120 And , further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 4 ) of that section, the Central Government directs that the right of user in the land shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of the publication of this declaration in the GAIL (India ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
2
3
4
5 1
1
0.0920
1160
Bhankrota
Kalan
1159
0.0160
1178
0.0240
1179
0.0160
0.0240
1180
1289
0.0080
0.0080
1288
1287
0.0280
1291
0.0320
1323
0.0880
1329
0.0720
1328
0.2080
1343
0,1400
0.0280
1343/2810
1342
0.0400
0.0960
1344
917
0.0120
1166
0.1180
0.1400
1162
1155
0.1100
0.0560
1286
0.1200
1300
1302
0.1580
1304
0.0100
1303
0.0360
0.2600
1305
0.1120
1322
0.0520
1321
1332
0.0930
0.0360
1333
0.0040
1331
1330
0.0310
TOTAL 2.7560
0.0560
BariKa Was 241
242
0.0560
243
0.0400
0,0080
244
229
0.0080
0.0120
274
277
0.0300
291
0.1000
323
0.1280
324
0.0080
331
0.0320
426
0.0040
239
0.0040
234
0,0200
233
0.0780
232
0.0800
0.0760
230
231
0,0200
4337 3
2
4
5
0.1000 Bari Ka Was 226
225
0,0600
136
0.0720
135
0.0240
134
0.1280
133
0.1920
270
0.1280
273
0.1240
272
0.1160
0.0180
292
318
0.1040
319
0.0440
322
0.1080
434
0.1720
432
0.3760
431
0,0400
426/483
0.0480
TOTAL
2.6140 ShriramKi 488
0.240 Nagal
493
0,1600
0.1080
492
0.1640
516
512
0.0240
0.0040
898
0.0360
901
0.0360
834
0.0880
464
0.0680
932
933
0.0800
TOTAL
0.7920
232/830
0.0400 Saipura
689/887 0.0160
0.0560
TOTAL
566
0.7600 Mohan-
pura
TOTAL
0.7600
0,0190 Govindpura 792/1003
BasBambala
TOTAL 0.0190
0.0240
238/562
Narsinghpura
TOTAL 0.0240
0.0160 Hasampura 147
BasBhankrota
TOTAL 0.0160
0.0120
54/328
Jagannath-
280/365 0,0200 pura
TOTAL 0.0320 4338
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
2
3
4
5
1
अनुसूची
क्षेत्रफल
मण्डल
गाँव
सर्वे नं.
जिला
0.0040
Shriram- 14
4
5
1
2
3
puraba
667/2 भाग 0.2240
चल्लपल्लि
0.0040
TOTAL
Bhankrota
पूर्वगोदावरी उप्पलगुप्तम
0.0200
717 भाग
0.0120
241/1142
Shikarpura
0.0880
710/1 भाग
0.0130
939
0.3360
709भाग 940/1188 0.0150
0.0200
694भाग TOTAL 0.0400
0.1120
693 भाग
0.0832
3307
Ajmer Ajmer Tabiji
0.0200
692भाग
0.3356
3180
0.1240
678/1/1 भाग 3181
0,0010
0.2000
678/1/2 भाग
0.2731
2681
0.0160
681 भाग TOTAL 0.6929
678/2 भाग 0.1640
0.0162
655
Kakalana
0.2880
679भाग
0.2520 TOTAL 0.0162
680 भाग
0.0020
0.0520
619 भाग 877
Pali Sojat Kelwad
0.0100
852
0.1800
617/2ए भाग
0.0800
849
0.1440
616/ 1ए भाग
0.0240
843
0.0560
616/2भाग
0.0080
616/1बी भाग
0.1160
TOTAL
615 भाग 0.3400 [F. No. L- 14014/27/02-G.P. ]
0.0360
614 भाग SWAMI SINGH, Director
0.0880
611/1 भाग नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
0.0520
611/2भाग
0.0120
611/3 भाग
613 भाग 0.0480
कुल 2.8800
[फा. सं. एल-14014/22/03- जी.पी. ] का०आ ० 1691.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है किओ.एन.जी.सी. गोपवरम से आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य में पूर्वी गोदावरी जिले के उप्पलगुप्तम मंडल के ग्राम चल्लपल्लि में स्थित गेल टेप- इन- पॉइन्ट तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , the 12th June, 2003 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
S.O. 1691. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Natural gas from ONGC Gopavaram to GAIL Tap - in - point located at Challapalli village ofUppalaguptham Mandal ofEast Godavari District inAndhra Pradesh State , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
Andwhereas, it appears , to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Anyperson intinterested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date ऐसा कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) केअधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, के. जी. बेसिन परियोजना, जैट्टी एवेन्यू, दानावैपेटा, राजामुन्द्री 533103 , आंध्र प्रदेश को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4339 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, K.G. Basin Project, Jetty Avenue , Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry- 533103 , Andhra Pradesh.
SCHEDULE
Area
District Mandal
Village Survey No.
3
4
5
2
1
East
0.2240
667/2 Part
Uppalaguptham Challapalli
ऐसाकोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्व है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 और 36, सैक्टर-1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
0.0200
717 Part
Godawari
0,0880
710/1 Part
अनुसूची
0.3360
709 Part
खसरा नं. अर्जित
परगना गाँव
तहसील
जिला
0.0200
694 Part
क्षेत्रफल
0.1120
693 Part
(हेक्टेयर
692 Part 0,0200
में)
0.1240
678/1/ 1Part
6
5
4
2
3
1
678/1/2 Part 0.2000
35 0.0216
मुहम्मदाबाद मुहम्मदाबाद टण्डवा
गाजीपुर
681 Part 0.0160
36 0.1300
0.1640
678/2 Part
37 0.2400
0.2880
679Part
38 0.1920
39 0.1560
0.2520
680 Part
40 0.0060
0.0520
619 Part
41 0.0300
0.1800
617/ 2A Part
34 0.0120
0.1440
616/1APart
योग 0.787.6
0.0560
616/2Part
239 0.1760
पीथापुर
0.0080
616/1B Part
गाजीपुर गाजीपुर
238 0.0040
615 Part 0.3400
241 0.0120
0.0360
614 Part
243 0.0660
0.0880
611/1 Part
245 0.0528
244 0.1512
0.0520
611/2 Part
247 0.0020
0.0120
611/3 Part
258 0.0050
613 Part 0.0480
265 0.2040
266 0.1440
Total 2.8800
267 0.1140
275 0.1040 [F. No. L- 14014/22/03-G.P. ]
284 0.0160 SWAMI SINGH , Director
चकरोड़ 0.0030 नई दिल्ली, 12 जून, 2003
योग 1.0540
62 0.4800
शादियाबाद पंडरी
सैदपुर
63 0.0120
90 0.1080
89 0.3320
87 0.0176
88 0.0540
86 0.0144 का०आ ० 1692.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन पश्चिम बंगाल- झारखंण्ड- बिहार उत्तर प्रदेश पाइपलाइन सैक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
48 0.0120
योग 1.0300
56 0.0680
कैथवली
57 0.0160
59 0.0768
60 0.1680 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
4340
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
4
1
5
6
कैथवली
61 0.2744 Gazipur
62 0.1156
63 0.0224
51 0.0210
73 0.0210
78 0.0504
74 0.1788
83 0.1200
82 0.0240
84 0.1320
86 0.0120
85 0.0080
93 0.0168
94 0.2174
95 0.0120
96 0.0240
55 0.0144
77 0.0064
योग 1.5994
[फा. सं. एल -14014/13/03-जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
S.O. 1692.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthe transportation of Natural gas through West Bengal- Jharkhand-Bihar- Uttar Pradesh Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Uttar Pradesh, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
Andwhereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying ofthe pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, B -35 and 36 , Sector- 1 , Noida- 201301 .
SCHEDULE
Tehsil
District
Survey Area Pargana Village
No. Acquired
(In Hect .) 3
1
2
4
5
6 Moham- Tandava 35 0.0216 Gazipur Moham-
madabad madabad
36 0.1300
37 0.2400
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 2
3
4
5
6 Moham- Tandava 38 0.1920 Moham-
madabad madabad
39 0.1560
40 0.0060
41 0.0300
34 0.0120
Total 0.7876 Gazipur Gazipur Peethapur 239 0.1760
238 0.0040
241 0.0120
243 0.0660
245 0.0528
244 0.1512
247 0.0020
258 0.0050
265 0.2040
266 0.1440
267 0.1140
275 0.1040
284 0.0160
Chakroad 0.0030
Total 1.0540
62 0.4800 Saidpur Shadiyabad Pandari
63 0.0120
90 0.1080
89 0.3320
87 0.0176
88 0.0540
86 0.0144
48 0.0120
Total 1.0300
Kaithvali 56 0.0680
57 0.0160
59 0.0768
60 0.1680
61 0.2744
62 0.1156
63 0.0224
51 0.0210
73 0.0210
78 0.0504
74 0.1788
83 0.1200
82 0.0240
84 0.1320
86 0.0120
85 0.0080
93 0.0168
94 0.2174
95 0.0120
96 0.0240
55 0.0144
77 0.0064
Total 1.5994
[F. No. L- 14014/13/03 -G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1 नईदिल्ली, 12 जून, 2003
रायगढ़ का.आ. 1693.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांकका. आ. 697 , तारीख , 11 फरवरी, 2002, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, महाराष्ट्र राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन दहेज - हजीरा-उरान- धाबोल पाइपलाइन सैक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और, उक्त, अधिसूचना की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30अक्तूबर , 2002 से 17 दिसम्बर, 2002 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
और , उक्त, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अनुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उस भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से सलंग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम, की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
गाँव
जिला तहसील
खसरा नं० अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में )
4
2
3
5
1
खाड़ी
पनवेल
रायगढ़
पलस्पे
30/1पी
00-11-00
00-12-00
30/2एपी
4341 2
3
4
5
00-12-00 पनवेल
30/2 बी पी
पलस्पे
22/1 पी
00-29-00
22/2पी
22/3 पी
18/1 पी
00-23-00
18/2पी
18/3पी
18/4पी
17/1 पी
15/4पी
15/5पी
15/6पी
00-13-00
7/3+4एपी
हाइवे
00-39-00
93/एपी
93/बीपी
54 पी
डेरवली
47/1पी
47/2
00-14-00
52पी
40/1
33/1पी
00-16-00
35/ए 1 पी
35/2पी
00-16-00 नेरे रोड
34पी
00-13-00
खाड़ी
55/1 पी
00-27-50
32पी
00-32-00
43पी
पॉवरलाइन
00-01-50
51पी
रीवर
00-15-00
161/0पी
00-39-00
104पी
रोड
कार्ट ट्रैक
50/1पी
49पी
00-14-00
98 पी
00-37-50
143 पी
00-04-50
18पी
00-18-00 4342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
4
1
3
5
1 2
163पी
नेरे
पनवेल
00-48-00 रायगढ़ रायगढ़
00-49-50
98पी
00-13-50
180पी
00-33-00
93पी
खानव
91/1पी
91/5पी
91/6पी
00-17-00
91/7 पी
91/8पी
00-18-00
90पी
96पी
83पी
78पी
77पी
00-11-00
79/4पी
75पी
00-14-00
72पी
00-42-00
67पी
00-68-00
69पी
65पी
00-17-00
64पी
00-23-00
62पी
58पी
57पी
54पी
55पी
00-16-00
56पी
01-09-50
51पी
00-05-3
कैनाल
कोन
18/1पी
17/5पी
00-12-00
17/6 पी
17/7पी
00-14-00
17/8पी
73/सी 1 पी
73/डीपी
मोहो 139/2पी
00-15-00
139/3पी
15/1पी
00-14-00
15/3पी
00-17-00
15/5 पी
18/1पी
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
4
2
3
5 मोटो 136पी
पनवेल
136/6पी
00-41-00
कार्ट ट्रैक
00-12-00
39/1पी
39/5पी
61 पी
66/6पी
66/4पी
66/1 पी
00-12-00
75/5 पी
86/2पी
63पी
00-67-00
30पी
01-29-00 बावन्जे 44 पी
00-57-00
14पी
00-14-00 वाकडी 16पी
00-35-00
150 पी
149पी
00-33-00
148 पी
134/4पी
00-14-00
134/5पी
134/7 पी
153/3पी
रोड
130/1पी
00-15-00
120पी
127पी
00-57-00
131पी
00-14-3
10पी
00-16-00 महालुन्गी 76 पी
रोड
62पी
00-23-00
00-37-00
8/4पी
53पी
00-32-00
22पी
25पी
00-15-00
24पी
26पी
27पी
00-11-00
29पी
00-11-00
सरकारी भूमि
30पी
00-35-00 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
5
4
3
1
2
00-14-00 रायगढ़ पनवेल
31 पी
महालुन्गी
रायगढ़
00-01-05
23पी
38पी
00-19-00
00-96-00
14पी
80पी
00-26-00
126 पी
00-24-00
निताले
135/1 पी
135/2पी
00-15-00
135/3 पी
00-24-00
135/4पी
00-24-00
91 पी
92पी
00-14-00
89/1पी
89/2पी
88पी
01-28-00
138पी
132पी
129पी
133/1से3 पी
00-17-00
6पी
5पी
10पी
00-87-00
136पी
00-35-00
174पी
महोदर
163पी
131पी
00-17-00
164पी
144पी
00-11-00
145पी
सरकारी भूमि
00-11-00
132पी
00-54-00
133 पी
126पी
127पी
125पी
00-11-00
124/1पी
00-18-00
124/2पी
48पी
00-21-00
49पी
00-39-00
67पी
65/1पी
65/2पी
00-15-00 1590 G1/03-10
4343
4
5 2
3
00-33-00
76 पी
महोदर
पनवेल
30 पी
विहिघर
00-44-00
36पी
37/2पी
00-12-00
33/6 पी
00-11-00
33/7 पी
54पी
00-24-00
55/1पी
00-12-00
60पी
00-24-00
61 पी
63पी
64पी
72पी
00-41-00
00-66-00
33 पी
चिखले
00-43-00
26/1पी
26/2पी
46/1पी
00-14-00
46/2पी
46/3पी
00-11-00
46/4पी
00-25-00
47पी
48/5 बी पी
00-18-00
48/5सी पी
50/1पी
00-19-00
50/2पी
50/5 पी
49/1पी
49/6 पी
54/1 पी
54/4पी
54/5 पी
54/7 पी
55/5 पी
00-11-00
55/1पी
55/2पी
55/3पी
55/4पी
00-12-00
74/5 पी
74/4पी
75/4 बीपी
75/4एपी
00-22-00
76/6पी 4344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
पनवेल
रायगढ़
चिखले 91/पी
Andwhereas the objection received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority;
92/1पी
93/1पी
00-22-00
93/2पी
And whereas the competent authority has , under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;
93/3पी
107/7 पी
107/8 पी
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein.
94 पी
00-11-00
कार्ट ट्रैक
रोड़
चिंध्रण
00-12-00
25पी
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred bySub -section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline; 28/1पी 00-26-00
28/2पी
29/2पी
29/3पी
29/4पी
29/6पी
00-11-00
31पी
00-35-00
00-12-00
कोल्खे खाड़ी
And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section(4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on the date of the publication of the declaration , in the GAIL ( India) Limited, proposing to lay the pepeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall , subject to the terms and conditions so imposed, vest in the GAIL ( India) , free from all encumbrances.
6पी
00-48-00
SCHEDULE
95पी
00-12-00
District Tehsil Village
14पी
Survey
00-02-03
No.
Area Acquired (InHect) 15पी
00-12-00
1
2
3
4
5 [फाइल सं ० एल-14014/24/01-जी०पी० ]
Panvel
Raigad
Palaspe Khadi
30/ 1P
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
00-11-00
30/2AP
00-12-00 New Delhi , the 12th June, 2003
30/2BP
00-12-00
22/ 1P
00-29-00
22 /2P
22/3P
18/1P
00-23-00
18/2P
18/3P
18/4P
17/1P
15/4P
15/ 5P
15/6P
7/3+4AP 00-13-00
Highway
93 /AP
S.O. 1693.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 697, dated the 11th February, 2002, issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notificaiton for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of natural gas through Dehej -Hazira - Uran- Dhabol Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Maharashtra, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
00-39-00
93/BP
54 P
Deravali
47/ 1P
Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public from 30th October, 2002 to 17th December, 2002;
47/2
00-14-00 4345 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
3
4
5 4
2
1
2
3
5
52P
Panvel Khanav 56 P
01-09-50 Panvel Deravali
Raigad
Raigad
00-05-03 40/1 P
51 P
33/1 P
Kon Canal
Panvel
Raigad
35/A1 P
00-16-00
18/1P
00-16-00
35/2 P
17/5 P
00-12-00 Road
17/6 P
34P
00-14-00
17/7 P
Khadi
00-13-00
17/8 P
00-27-50
55/1 P
73 /C1P
32P
00-32-00
73/D P
43 P
00-15-00
139/2 P
Moho
Power line
139/3 P
00-01-50
51 P
15/1 P
00-14-00 River
00-15-00
Nere
00-17-00
15/3 P
161/0P
15/5 P
104P
00-39-00
18/1 P
Road
136 P
Cart Track
136/6 P
00-41-00 50/1P
CartTrack 49P
00-14-00
39/1 P
00-12-00
00-37-50
98 P
39/5 P
143P
00-04-50
61P
00-18-00
19 P
66/6P
00-48-00
163 P
66/4P
00-49-50
98 P
66/1P
180P
00-13-50
00-12-00
75/5 P
00-33-00
Khanay 93 P
86/2P
91/1 P
00-67-00
63 P
91/5 P
01-29-00
Wavanje 30 P
91/6 P
00-17-00
44P
91/7 P
00-57-00
14 P
00-18-00
91/8 P
00-14-00
Vakadi 16 P
90P
150P
00-35-00 96 P
00-33-00
149 P
83 P
148 P
78 P
00-14-00
134/4P
77 P
79/4 P
00-11-00
134/5 P
75P
00-14-00
134/7 P
00-42-00
72P
00-01-50
153/3 P
67P
00-68-00
Road
69P
00-15-00
130/1 P
65 P
00-17-00
120 P
00-23-00
64P
127P
00-05-40 62P
00-57-00
131 P
58P
00-14-03
10 P
57P
00-16-00
Mahabunge 76 P
54P
Road*
55P
00-16-00
62P
00-23-00 4346
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 Panvel
8/4 P
Maha-
00-37-00 Raigad
Raigad
00-32-00 lunge 53 P
22P
25 P
00-15-00
24P
26P
27 P
00-11-00
29 P
Govt. Land 00-11-00
30 P
00-35-00
31P
00-14-00
23P
00-01-05
38P
00-19-00
14P
00-96-00
80P
00-26-00 Nitale 126 P
00-24-00
135/1 P
135/2P
135/3 P
00-15-00
135/4P
00-24-00
91P
00-24-00
92P
89/1P
00-14-00
89/2P
88 P
01-28-00
138P
132P
129P
133/1 to 3 P
6P
00-17-00
5P
10P
136P
00-87-00
174 P
Mahodar
00-35-00
163 P
131 P
164-P
00-17-00
144P
00-11-00
145 P
Govt . Land
132P
00-11-00
133 P
00-54-00
126P
127 P
125 P
00-11-00
124/1 P
124/2P
00-18-00
48 P
00-21-00
49P
67 P
00-39-00
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
4
3
5
65/1 P
Panvel Mahodar
65/2P
00-15-00
76P
00-33-00
30P
Vihighar
36P
00-44-00
37/2P
00-12-00
33/6 P
00-11-00
33/7 P
54P
55/1 P
00-24-00
60P
00-12-00
61P
00-24-00
63P
64P
72P
00-41-00 Chikhale 33 P
00-66-00
26/1 P
00-43-00
26/2P
46/1P
46/2P
00-14-00
46/3 P
00-11-00
46/4P
47P
00-25-00
48/5BP
48/5CP
00-18-00
50/1P
00-19-00
50/2P
50/5P
49/1 P
49/6 P
54/1 P
54/4P
54/5 P
54/7 P
55/5P
55/ 1P
00-11-00
55/2P
55/3 P
55/4 P
74/5 P
00-12-00
74/4 P
75/4BP
00-06-03
75/4A P
76/6 P
00-22-00
91 P
92/1P
93/1 P
00-22-00
93/2P
93/3 P
107/7P
107/8 P 4347 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
2
3
1
00-11-00
Chikhale 94 P
Panvel
Raigad
CartTrack
00-12-00
Chindran Road
25 P
00-26-00
28/1 P
28/2P
29/2 P
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तोंके अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
29/3 P
अनुसूची
29/4 P
29/6 P
00-11-00
सर्वेसं०
ग्राम
तहसील
जिला
क्षेत्रफल
00-35-00
31 P
00-15-26
वासणा- 1319
महेमदाबाद
खेड़ा
Khadi
00-12-00
Kolkhe
केनाल
00-02-24
मारगीया
00-48-00
6P
00-12-00
95 P
00-13-57
महीज 161
00-02-03
14P
00-01-85
रोड
15 P
00-12-00
00-32-92
कुल
[FileNo. L- 14014/24/01 -G.P. ]
SWAMI SINGH, Director
[फा.सं. - एल-14014/4/03- जी० पी० ] नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003 का०आ ० 1694.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (196250 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का ० आ० 714 , तारीख 01 मार्च , 2003 , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में जीजीएस वासना से मंगलम एलॉयज पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के परियोजना के लिए, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
S.O. 1694. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 714 , dated the 1st March , 2003 , issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transport of petroleum gas from GGS Vasna to Manglam Alloys pipeline project in the State of Gujarat by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 23 मार्च , 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 23rd March, 2003;
और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा साधारण जनता से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुए हैं;
And whereas no objection have been received by the competent authority from the public to the laying of the pipeline;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उस भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है;
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein .
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
4348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
आरसीएफ प्रियदर्शिनी बिल्डिंग मुम्बई-400022 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला
गाँव सर्वेनं०
तालुक
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में )
1
2
3
4
5
26/1
मानगॉव तालेगॉव
रायगढ़
0.0100
26/2
139
0.6000 And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest, on the date of the publication of the declaration , in the GAIL ( India) Limited , proposing to lay the pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall , subject to the terms and conditions so imposed, vest in the GAIL (India ) , free from all encumbrances .
27/1
SCHEDULE
27/2
0.1300 Tehsil
District
Village
25/1 सौ
0.0200 Survey No.
Area In (Hect.)
28/1
Kheda
00-15-26
1319
Mahmeda- Vasna
28/2
0.4800 bad
00-02-24
28/3
Margiya/ Canal
00-13-57
36/1
Mahij 161
36/2
0.0600 Road
00-01-85
36/3
00-32-92
35/3
0.4100
35/4
0.2400 [File No. L- 14014/4/ 203 -G.P.J SWAMI SINGH , Director
43/3
0.0400 नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
43/4
0.1400
43/5
0.1400
43/6
0.1400
41
0.0200
40/1
40/2
0.5800 का० आ ० 1695.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन दहेज- हजीरा उरान - धाबोल पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
40/3
140/1
140/2ए
140/2बी
140/2सी
0.6000 और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
140/2 डी
140/2 ई
140/2एफ
140/2जी
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 )की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
66/1
66/2
66/3 ए-1
0.0300
66/3ए-2
66/3बी -1
66/3बी-2
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाये जाने के सम्बन्ध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, 7वाँ तल, वी- विंग , भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
4
5
3
2
1
रायगढ़ मानगाँव तालेगाँव 67/1ए
रायगढ़
67/1बी
67/1सी
67/1डी
67/2
67/3
67/4ए-1
0.2800
67/4ए-2
67/4बी
67/4सी
67/5
67/6 ए
67/6बी
67/7
67/8 ए
67/8बी
68/1 ए
68/1बी
0.2200
68/2ए-1
68/2ए-2
68/2ए-3
68/2बी
76/1
76/2
76/3
0.5200
76/4ए
76/4बी
76/4सी
0.3200
131
0.0400
नाला
0.0500
कैनाल
5.0700
कुल
लेखपाले 599
0.1000
0,1000
600
0.0100
592
0.0300
591
0.2200
589
585
0.2000
0.0100
584
0.0400
407
0.0300
408
410
0.0100
4349
4
5 2
3
0,0500 लेखपाले 413
मानगाँव
0.0200 -जारी 415
0,0300
414
0.0100
411
0.0800
412
0.0100
416
0.0200
417
0.1300
324
0.0500
326
0.0200
325
330
0,0100
0.0400
329
328
0.0100
331
0.1400
0.0400
नाला
0.0900
271
0.0800
317
0.0500
272
274
0.1100
0.0800
275
0.0100
279
0.0300
276
0.0200
277
0.0900
257
0.0100
256
0.0200
255
0.0200
258
0.0200
251
0.0200
254
253
0.0700
0.0200
173
0.0400
174
0.0100
139
0,0500
172
0.0100
175
174
0.0100
140
0.1200
0.0300
170
141
0.0500
0.0500
142
0.1700
108 (1)
143
0.1500 4350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
5
1 मानगाँव
रायगढ़
0.6900
108 (2)
लेखपाले
रायगढ़
107
-जारी
0.1400
106
0.0100
79
0.0200
78
0.0200
77
0.0100
76
0.0100
कुल
3,7400
488
गंगावली
0.0200
487सी
0.0300
490
0.1100
491
0.0800
487 वी
0.0900
493
0.1000
496
0.1800
494बी
0.1100
494सी
}}
495
0.0500
369वी
0.2800
369सी
371
0.0300
372
0.0500
370
0.2800
362
0.0200
365
0.1200
364
0.2000
363
0.1500
352वी
0.1200
352सी
}}
355
0.0400
356
0.1800
354
0.1400
389
0.1200
390
0.1200
387
0.0200
392
0.0100
384
0.0200
393 वी
0.6600
382
0.0200
394
0.3200
395
0.1500
408
0.0100
409
0.0500
563
0.0100
410
0.0100
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 2
3
4
5 मानगाँव
373
गंगावली
0,0700
357
-जारी
0.0100
3.9700
कुल
कोस्ते
0.3200
116/7ए
0.0400
116/8
बुडरूख
116/9
0.0200
116/10ए
0.0400
116/ 10वी
116/6 ए
116/6 बी
0.0400
116/6 सी
114/4 ए
114/4बी
0.5900
114/4सी
118/6 ए
0,0100
118/6 बी
118/7
0.1000
118/2ए
118/2बी
0.0400
118/2सी
118/3 सी
0.1900
118/3 डी
0.0400
118/5
0,0100
119/4
0.0100
0.5100
119/2 बी +3
119/2 ए (2)
120/1
0.0600
120
0.0400
120/3
120/4
0.0900
120/5
0.0880
34/1
34/2
34/3
34/4
34/5
0,3500
34/6
34/7
34/8
34/9
121
0.2200
40
0.2000 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5 मानगाँव कोस्ते 164
रायगढ़
0.0300 (जारी) (जारी)
0.2500
बुडरूख 41
165
0.0700
116
0.0300
119
0.0100
120
0.0600
3.3980
कुल
0.2500
99/1 ए
देवाली
99/1 बी
99/2
0.0700
99/3
0.0500
99/4
0.0200
97/1
0.6700
97/2
96/1
96/2
96/3
96/4
96/5
96/6
96/7
0.0400
96/8
96/9
96/10
96/11
96/12
96/13
96/14
96/15
91/3
0.0300
1
0.0700
91/5 ए
91/5बी ।
91/10
0.0200
91/11
0.2000
0.0300
91/12 ए
91/12बी
नाला
0.0300
155
0.1500
154
0.0200
132
0,0800
98
0,1900
रीवर
0.2500
2.1700
कुल
[फाइल सं . एल-14014/12/03 -जी.पी ]
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक 1590 G1/03-11
4351 New Delhi , the 12th June , 2003
S.O. 1695.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej -Hazira- Uran -Dhabol Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Maharashtra , a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;
Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one-days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, 7th Floor, B -Wing, RCF Priyadarshini Building, Mumbai- 400 022 (Maharashtra) .
SCHEDULE
Taluk
District
Village Survey No.
Area Acquired (InHect) 2 3
4
5
Raigad Mangaon
26/1
Talegaon
0.0100
26/2
139
0.6000
27/1
0.1300
27/2
25/1 सी
0.0200
28/1
28/2
0.4800
28/3
36/1
36/2
0.0600
36/3
35/3
0.4100
35/4
0.2400 4352
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
3
5 4
1
2
5
2
3
1
0.0400
Mangaon Talegaon 68/1 A
43/3
0.1400
(Contd. ) ( Contd. ) 68/1 B
Raigad Mangaon Talegaon (Contd. ) (Contd. ) (Contd.) 43/4
Raigad (Contd.)
0.1400
43/5
68/2 A- 1
43/6
0.1400
0,2200
68/2 A- 2
0.0200
41
68/2 A-3
} 40/1
68/2B
40/2
0.5800
76/1
40/3
76/2
140/1
0.5200
76/3
140/2 A
76/4A
76/4B
140/2B
76/4 C
140/2C
0.6000
0.3200 140/2D
131
0.0400
NALA
140/2E
0.0500
Canal
140/2F
TOTAL
5.0700 140/2G
0.1000 66/1
Lakhpale 599
0.1000 66/2
600
0.0100 66/3 A- 1
0.0300
592
0.0300
591
66/3 A-2
0.2200
589
66/3B - 1 .
585
0.2000 66/3B-2
0.0100
584
67/1 A
0.0400
407
67/1 B
0.0300
408
67/1 C
0.0100 67/1 D
410
67/2
413
0,0500 67/3
0.0200
415
67/4A-1
0.0300
414
0.2800
67/4A-2
0.0100
411
0.0800 67/4B
412
67/4 C
416
0.0100 67/5
0.0200
417
67/6 A
0.1300
324
67/6B
326
0.0500
0.0200
325
67/7
0.0100
330
67/8A
329
0.0400 67/8B 4353
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0.0100
0.0200
488
328
Gangavli
Raigad Mangaon Talegaon
0.0300
487 C
0.1400
331
(Contd.) (Contd. ) (Contd. )
0.1100
0.0400
Mangaon Gangavli 490
Raigad
NALA
Raigad Mangaon Lakhpale
0,0800
491
0.0900
271
0,0900
487V
0,0800
317
0.1000
493
0.0500
272
496
0.1800
0.1100
274
494V
0.1100
0.0800
275
494C
0.0100
279
0.0500
495
0.0300
276
369V
0,2800
369C
0.0200
277
0.0300
371
0.0900
257
0.0500
372
0.0100
256
0.2800
370
0.0200
255
0.0200
362
0.0200
258
0.1200
365
0.0200
251
0.2000
364
0.0200
254
0,1500
363
0.0700
253
0.1200
352V
352C
0.0200
173
0.0400
355
0.0400
174
0,1800
356
0.0100
139
0.1400
354
0.0500
172
0.1200
389
0.0100
175
0.1200
390
0.0200
0.0100
387
174
0,0100
392
0.1200
140
0,0200
384
0.0300
170
0,6600
393 V
0,0500
141
0.0200
382
0,3200
394
0.0500
142
0.1500
395
0.1700
108 (1)
0.0100
408
0.1500
143
0.0500
409
0.6900
0.0100
563
108(2)
0.0100
410
0.1400
107
0.0700
373
0.0100
106
0.0100
357
0.0200
79
3.9700
TOTAL
0.0200
78
0.3200
Koste 116/7A
0.0100
0.0400
116/8
Budrukh
0.0100
76
0.0200
116/9
116/10 A Al
3.7400
TOTAL
0.040
116/10B 4354
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Raigad
Koste
Mangaon
116/6 A
0.2500
Raigad Mangaon Devali A
99/1
Budrukh 116/6 B
0.0400
99/1B } 116/6 C
99/2
0.0700 114/4 A
99/3
0.0500 114/4 B
0.5900
99/4
0.0200 114/4 C
97/1
0.6700 118/6 A
0,0100
97/2
118/6B
96/1
118/7
0.1000
96/2
118/2A
96/3
118/2 B
0.0400
96/4
118/2C
96/5
0.1900
118/3 C
96/6
118/3 DJ
0.0400
96/7
0.0400 118/5
0.0100
96/8
119/4
0,0100
96/9
119/2 B+ 3 B+3 0.5100
96/10
119/2 A(2)
96/11
120/1
0.0600
96/12
120
96/13
120/3
0.0400
96/14
120/4
0,0900
96/15
120/5
0.0880
91/3
0.0300 34/1
91/5 A
0.0700 34/2
S
91/ 5B
34/3
91/10
0.0200 34/4
91/11
0.2000 34/5
0.3500
0.0300
91/12A
34/6
91 /12B
34/7
NALA
0.0300 34/8
155
0.1500 34/9
154
0.0200 121
0.2200
132
0.0800 40
0.2000
98
0.150 164
0.0300
River
0.2500 41
0.2500
TOTAL
2.1700 165
0.0700
116
0.0300
[F. No. L- 14014/ 12/ 2003 -G.P. ] 119
0.0100
SWAMI SINGH, Director 120
0,0600
TOTAL
3,3980 4355 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
2
1
3
4
5 नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
पनवेल
पलस्पे
00-45-00
8/02
रायगढ़
8/03
8/01
नेरे
50/2
160
00-15-00
डेरवली 53
का. आ. 1696 .-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन दहेज- हजीरा उरान - धाबोल पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
महोदर 165/3
165/5
165/10
65/5
00-31-00
66
विहिघर 29
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
चिखले 10
कोन 22/4
कोल्खे 11
12
00-16-00
31
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
0-11-00
खानाव 59
निटाले 93/2
00-18-00
महालुन्गी 13
[फा. सं. एल-14014/12/03/जी. पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
NewDelhi , the 12th June , 2003 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी गरत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाये जाने के सम्बन्ध में, सैक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड , 7वाँ तल , बी-विंग , आरसीएफ प्रियादर्शिनी बिल्डिंग, मुम्बई -400 022 ( महराष्ट्र ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
गाँव
जिला
खसरा नं.
तहसील
S.O. 1696. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej -Hazira- Uran -Dhabol pipeline Sector under National Grid Project in the State of Maharashatra, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laidby the GAIL (India) Limited;
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में )
1
2
3
4
5
38/5
पनवेल
मोहो
रायगढ़
Andwhereas , it appears , to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification; 31/0
65/3
00-22-00
65/5
65/6
65/8
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
वाकडी 14/1
00-13-00
00-15-00
14/3
146
00-19-05
00-01-50
151/3
पलस्पे 135
10
131
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object inwriting to the laying of the pipeline under the land tothe Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, 7th Floor, B-Wing, RCF Priyadarshani Building, Mumbai -400 022 (Maharashtra).
4356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] SCHEDULE
District Tehsil Village Survey Area No.
से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
Acquired
(inHect.)
1
4
2
3
5
Panvel Moho 38/5
Raigad
31/0
65/3
00-22-00
65/5
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
65/6
65/8
Wakdi 14/1
00-13-00
00-15-00
14/3
146
00-19-05
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50)की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
151/3
00-01-50
Palaspe 135
10
131
8/02
00-45-00
8/03
8/01
Nere
50/2
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के सम्बन्ध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, 7 वाँ तल , बी-विंग , आरसीएफ प्रियादर्शिनी बिल्डिंग , मुम्बई -400 022 ( महराष्ट्र ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
160
00-15-00
Deravali 53
अनुसूची
Mahodar 165/3
165/5
जिला
गाँव सर्वे नं.
तालुक
165/10
.00-08-00
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में ) 65/5
00-31-00
1
2
3
4
5 66
रत्नागिरी दपोली
दभोल
0.0938
163
Vihighar 29
164
1.4196 Chikhale 10
48
4.7700 Kon
22/4
134
0.0762 Kolkhe 11
50
0.1147 12
00-16-00
165
0.2264 31
43
2.7325
0-11-00
Khanav 59
169
1.0263 Nitale 93/2
00-18-00
1.3545
168
Mahalunge 13
170
1.3055 [F. No. L- 14014/ 12/03-G.P. ]
171
3.2028 SWAMI SINGH, Director
8.9348
182ए
वशिष्टीरीवर
3.4588 नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
28.7159
कुल
[फा. सं . एल.-14014/12/03/जी. पी. ] का. आ. 1697.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन दहेज-हजीरा उरान धाबोल पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 4357 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
New Delhi, the 12th June , 2003
S.O. 1697.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej - Hazira- Uran-Dhabol pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Maharashtra , a pipe line with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
Andwhereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of User in the land under which the saidpipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
का. आ. 1698.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962(1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 2967 तारीख 16 सितम्बर, 2002 , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में काण्डला/जामगनर- लोनी एलपीजी पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से द्रवीकृत पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 21 सितम्बर, 2002 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, 7th Floor, B - Wing , RCF Priyadarshini Building , Mumbai -400022 (Maharashtra).
SCHEDULE
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने केलिए अपेक्षित है , उस भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है;
Taluk
District
Village Survey No.
Area Acquired (inHect.)
0.0938
Dabhol 163
Dapoli
Ratnagiri
1.4196
164
4.7700
48
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
0.0762
134
0.1147
50
0.2264
165
2.7325
43
1.0263
169
1.3545
168
और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरांत, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
1.3055
170
अनुसूची
3.2028
171
गाँव सर्वे सं०
तहसील
8.9348 जिला
182A
क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में )
3.4588
Vashisti River
5
4
2
3
1
28.7159
TOTAL
815/पैकी
कीडियानगर
रापर
कच्छ
0-14-80 [File No. L- 14014/12/2003 -G.P. ]
815/पैकी
छोटापार पेरापुस
SWAMI SINGH, Director 4358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 ; 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 कच्छ
रापर
छोटापर 815/पैकी
0-13-40
कच्छ
822/2
पेटापुरा
0-00-75
815/पैकी
0-03-40
804/पैकी
0-19-80
807
0-17-20
808/1
0-20-70
0-27-00
808/2
744/1
0-10-80
745/1
0-24-30
746/2
0-23-40
1318
0-18-00
743/पैकी
0-01-23
742/1
0-25-24
747/2
0-11-80
27
बदलपुर
0-20-52
680/3
पेटापुरा
697
0-20-60
698/2
0-26-10
699
698/1
25
0-19-40
703/1
0-20-80
1223/2
1223/1
0-07-60
1222
0-24-00
89/पैकी
0-10-20
89/पैकी
0-08-60
89/पैकी
0-10-40
93
0-25-20
1228/1
0-59-40
1228/2
993/2
0-19-00
994
0-18-00
1318/पैकी
0-28-60
967/पैकी
0-29-40
967/पैकी
0-27-60
967/पैकी
0-23-00
967/पैकी
0-11-60
967/पैकी
0-05-60
969
0-39-20
949
0-41-20
944
0-24-40
943
0-14-32
817/2
0-11-00
817/1
0-25-75
815
0-07-80
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2 3
4
5 रापर
702/1
कीडियानगर
0-19-00
583/3
बदलपुर
0-12-40
583/1
0-18-74 पेटापुरा
582/1-पैकी
0-12-90
586/पैकी
586/पैकी
0-19-80
586/पैकी
0-20-20
589/1
0-18-00
589/3
0-12-00
590/2
0-07-32
590/3
0-18-00
591/6
0-19-12
591/1-पैकी
0-08-40
591/1-पैकी
0-22-80
592/1
0-16-70
567/3
0-11-40
567/4
0-27-40
567/2
0-33-20
570
0-21-20
कुल
11-70-39 [फा० सं ० एल-14014/42/2002- जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह,निदेशक New Delhi , the 12th, June , 2003
S.O. 1698. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2967 dated the 16th September, 2002 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referredto as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transport of liquefied petroleum gas through Kandla/Jamnagar - Loni LPG Pipeline Project in the State ofGujarat by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public from 21st September, 2002;
Andwhereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the competent authority ;
And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right ofuser therein.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4359
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21, 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
Kutch Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest, on the date of the publication of the declaration , in the GAIL (India ) Limited, proposing to laythe pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall, subject to the terms and conditions so imposed, vest in the GAIL( India), free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
Distt.
Tehsil Village Survey No./ BlockNo.
2
3
4
5
0-10-20
89/P
Rapar Chotapar
0-08-60 Patapura 89 /P
89/P
0-10-40
93
0-25-20
1228/1
0-59-40
1228/2
993/2
0-19-00
994
0-18-00
1318/P
0-28-60
967/P
0-29-40
0-27-60
967/P
967/P
0-23-00
967/P
0-11-60
967 /P
0-05-60
Area in
Hectares
2
3
4
1
5
Kutch
0-07-80 Rapar Kidiyanagar 815
(Chhotapar 815/ P
0-14-80
815/P
Patapura)
815/P
0-13-40
822/2
0-00-75
815/P
0-03-40
804/P
0-19-80
807
0-17-20
808/1
0-20-70
808/2
0-27-00
744/1
0-10-80
745/1
0-24-30
746/2
0-23-40
1318
0-18-00
743/P
0-01-23
0-25-24
742/1
747/2
0-11-80
0-20-52 Patapura 27
(Badalpur)
680/3
697
0-20-60
698/2
0-26-10
699
698/1
25
0-19-40
703/1
0-20-80
1223/2
1223/1
0-07-60
1222
0-24-00 1590 GI/03-12
969
0-39-20
949
0-41-20
944
0-24-40
943
0-14-32
817/2
0-11-00 Badal Pura 817/1
0-25-75
0-19-00
702/1
Patapura
583/3
0-12-40
583/1
0-18-74
0-12-90
582/ 1 -P
586/P
586/P
0-19-80
586/P
0-20-20
589/1
0-18-00
0-12-00
589/3
590/2
0-07-32
590/3
0-18-00
591/6
0-19-12
591 / 1 -P
0-08-40
591/ 1-P
0-22-80
592/1
0-16-70
567/3
0-11-40
567/4
0-27-40
567/2
0-33-20
570
0-21-20
Total
11-70-39
[F. No. L- 14014/42/2002-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH, Director 4360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
1
2
3
4
5 नईदिल्ली, 12 जून, 2003
नवसारी जलालपोर (1 ) नडीद
0-10-37
236
218
0-39-17
216
0-23-04
214
0-31-10
212
0-34-56
रोड
0-02-30
196
0-06-91
197
0-27-65
198
0-11-52
204/पैकी
का. आ. 1699.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 1962 तारीख , 03 जून, 2002 , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में हजीरा उरान पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी;
0-17-28
खाडी
0-16-13
203
0-06-91 और उक्त, अधिसूचना की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 02 अगस्त, 2002 से 19 अगस्त, 2002 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
202
0-63-36
131
0-11-52
132
0-40-32 और, उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा सम्यक् रूप से विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है ;
134
0-22-40
135
0-08-06 और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
रोड
0-05-76
109
0-11-52
केनाल
0-17-28 और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
110
0-03-45
111
0-57-60
112
0-29-95
116
0-34-56
117
0-32-26
237
0-08-06 अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
06-20-01
कुलः
रीवर
(2) जलालपोर
01-01-38
110/1
110/2/1
110/2/2
0-58-75
110/3,4,5
111/1,2
111/3-1
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित किए गए निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।
111/3-2
अनुसूची
111/3-3-1
111/3-3-2
0-07-49 जिला तहसील गाँव सर्वे नंबर
109/1, 2, 3 ,
लिए अर्जित की
4,5,6
0-51-84
107/1-अ-ब
उ. का. अ. के जाने वाली भूमि (हेक्टेयर में )
107/2,4,5
1
2
3
4
107/3-1
5
107-3-2
0-50-69 नवसारी जलालपोर ( 1 ) नडोद
0-07-80
108/1,2,3
232 235
0-39-17
0-05-18
4,5,6 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4361 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 नवसारी जलालपोर ( 2 ) जलालपोर 106/ 1-1
नवसारी
0-18-43
जलालपोर ( 2) जलालपोर 426/1,2,3
106/1-2
425/1,2
0-33-99
0-34-56
106/2,3,4,5
396
81-1-1
396/पैकी
0-06-34 81/ 1-2
81/2-3
395/1, 3 , 4, 5
0-38-02
395/1-पैकी
82/1,2,3 ,
0-26-50
4,5,6,7,8
395/2-1-पैकी 82/6-अ
395/2-2-पैकी 79/1-1-1-1
395/2-2 -पैकी 79/1-1-1-2
395/2-1
0-42-62 79/ 1-1-2
394/1-पैकी
79/1-1-3
394/2
79/1-1-4
394/3
79/1-1-4
394/4
0-20-74 79/1-2
कारट्रेक
0-01-05 79/2-3-4
0-04-03
389/1
78/1, 2, 3 , 4,
389/2
0-53-50 5,6,7
0-48-38
0-40-90
365/ 1,2,3
77/1,2,3,4
366/1-2
0-06-34 5,6,7,8
0-35-71
ड्रेइन
0-04-61
10-95-51
कुल
468/1-1
(3) भुतसाड 218
0-14-26 468/1-2
रोड
0-05-94 468/2
0-21-89
182
0-96-23 466/1-1
466/1-2
185
0-19-58 466/2
0-26-50
187
0-14-98 465
0-15-68
188
0-14-98 462/1, 2, 3 ,
118
0-51-84 4,5
0-14-98
145
0-24-22 463
0-25-34
146
0-19-06 460/1 , 2, 3,
133
0-01-71 4,5,6
0-43-20
रोड
0-10-41
0-26-50
458/1,2
93
0-40-32 457/1-अ-ब
62
0-29-22 457/2-3
0-32-26
61
0-27-32 456/1
58
456/2
0-32-08 456/2
0-47-23
खाडी
0-06-91
0-16-00
455/1, 2, 3, 4
59
0-14-40 451/1
60
0-14-40 451/2
कुल
04-37-86 451/2
451/3-अ-ब
806
0-33-41
(4)मंदिर
0-24-95
805
4501/1,2 ,
0-17-86 3,4
0-41-47
रोड
0-06-91 448/1,2,3
0-28-80
821
0-03-07 427
0-31-10
830
0-20-73 4362
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
5
2
1
3
4
5 829
0-23-04
नवसारी जलालपोर (4) मंदिर
0-09-60
नवसारी जलालपोर
अब्रामा (जारी ) 2295
0-02-88
828
2296
0-20-01
0-22-60
0-11-52
2341
केनाल
2297
0-03-84 828/पैकी
0-08-06
2337
0-03-07 827
0-33-28
2338
826
0-04-60
2336
0-09-58 केनाल
0-14-98
2335
0-23-35 849
0-05-94
2334
0-01-80 879
0-03-46
2376
0-17-86 878
0-21-89
2375
0-23-75 877
0-08-06
2400
0-14-50 876
0-20-74
2399
0-07-68 868
0-02-88
2403
0-14-80 875
0-06-91
2398
0-01-25 869
0-27-32
2397
0-01-30 870
0-01-73
2404
0-28-04 871
0-03-46
2405
0-14-72 863
0-40-08
2407
0-04-80 862
0-09-22
2408
0-28-90 रोड
0-09-21
0-03-46
रोड
934
0-38-71
2510
0-14-30
0-05-76
935
2514
0-37-60 939
0-09-50
2508/1
0-07-68 937
0-14-98
रोड
0-11-52 रोड
0-06-91
2508/2
0-10-37 859
0-35-64
2501/2
0-02-88 950
0-10-36
2500
0-23-04 966
0-05-76
2499/1
0-22-84 965
0-16-13
2491/2
0-21-95 964
0-14-97
2484/2
0-05-76 963
0-12-67
रोड
0-06-91 953
0-03-84
2484/1
0-40-90 962
0-04-75
2479
0-04-80 954
0-10-69
2480
0-00-15 955
0-52-27
0-31-90
2478
956
0-21-62
रोड
0-05-76 957
0-13-25
309
0-00-38
0-22-16
खाड़ी
319
0-18-20
06-32-77
कुल
318
0-00-57
317
0-09-60
0-42-30
खाड़ी
(5) अब्रामा
316
0-18-43 2293/2
0-01-15
2293/1
0-12-09
रोड
0-15-00 2294
0-14-98
314
0-19-30 2343
0-10-75
327
0-26-50 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4363 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
2
3
4
5 नवसारी जलालपोर
0-14-40
(5) अब्रामा 326 .
नवसारी समाप्त
686
0-31-50
(6) वेडछा
0-43-78
(जारी) 334/1
0-22-50
(जारी) 687
335
0-11-52
रोड
0-04-50 338
0-09-60
646
0-61-08 339/1
0-15-94
641
0-28-50 341
0-29-76
625
0-18-00 342/1
0-01-35
0-14-13
केनाल
08-29-87
कुल:
626
0-24-00 1036
0-02-50
(6) वेडछा
601
0-15-00 1035
0-32-00
08-05-47
कुल:
1038
0-04-80
188
01-11-67
गणदेवी (7) कोलवा
1039
0-34-20
191
0-15-49 1040
0-27-00
190
0-57-02 1041
0-05-25
204
0-42-77 1029
0-12-75
256
0-11-88 1028
0-01-50
205
0-21-41 डी-केनाल
255
0-38-02 1027
0-12-00
कारट्रेक
0-07-13 1042
0-22-50
254
0-01-83 1026
0-07-50
223
0-45-14 1009
0-13-50
253
0-23-76 1043
224
0-64-15 1008
0-37-06
221
0-07-96 रेलवे
0-03-31
225
0-28-51 975
0-13-50
226
0-07-08 969
0-24-00
227
0-19-01 974
0-46-06
232
रोड
0-04-50
231
0-09-50 809
0-12-00
230
0-23-76 810
0-18-00
228
0-01-28 811
0-26-00
233
0-03-42 802
0-05-50
217/अ
0-99-79 800
215
0-76-03 799
0-24-00
कारट्रेक
0-07-13 791
0-25-65
326
0-99-79 792
0-05-50
793
08-23-62
कुल:
794
0-04-75
केनाल
(8) सालेज
781
0-37-50
119
0-09-61 683
0-16-65
120
0-32-07 680
0-08-45
कारट्रेक
0-02-38 682
0-15-40
123
0-15-44 केनाल
0-05-56
125
0-73-66 684
0-43-50
131
0-29-70 685
0-24-00
134
0-03-56 4364
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
रोड
नवसारी गणदेवी ( 8 ) सालेज
0-02-38 नवसारी
132
(जारी)
0-02-19
रोड
0-04-75
253
0-05-05
252
0-39-91
258
0-10-69
259
0-05-94
260
0-08-32
261
0-19-01
0-04-75
245
243
0-09-50
242
0-14-26
241
0-09-50
239
0-19-01
237/अ
0-15-44
237/ब
0-15-44
236
0-07-13
03-63-44
कुल
0-18-41 (9) इच्छापुर 321
320
0-00-59
322
0-10-69
317
0-17-82
316
0-08-91
281
0-21-38
280
0-05-94
279
0-24-35
278
0-15-44
277
0-25-54
276
0-08-91
275
0-05-94
274
0-09-50
271
0-48-68
कारट्रेक
0-09-47
266
0-38-01
265
0-01-33
263
0-19-00
264
0-01-44
178
0-16-03
254
0-29-10
180
0-09-31
201
0-35-64
216
0-54-64
217
0-18-41
220
0-32-07
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 2
3
4
5
0-06-36
रोड
गणदेवी (9 ) इच्छापुर
(जारी) 584
0-26-75
608
0-20-96
607
0-11-28
587
0-06-04
588
0-20-79
0-05-02
ड्रेइन
589
0-11-88
590
0-08-91
605
0-03-56
592
0-32-08
594
0-01-13
593
0-02-08
रीवर
0-49-17
06-92-56
कुल
रीवर
0-50-69 (10) माणेकपुर
49
0-23-04
51
0-04-50
88
0-14-40
90
0-25-34
95
0-17-28
127/पैकी
0-16-50
रोड
89
0-04-03
127
0-12-00
128
0-00-75
01-71-53
कुल
103
0-31-50 (11) गडत
102
0-08-25
केनाल
0-32-06
104
0-06-75
100
0-05-25
98
0-06-75
97
0-04-50
108
0-02-25
96
0-19-58
109
0-24-00
113
0-09-75
112
0-04-50
114
0-02-25
रोड
0-10-49
115
0-00-75
160
0-08-50
158
0-17-28 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4365 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 157
( 11 ) गडत
नवसारी गणदेवी
0-53-76
805
( 12 ) घनोरी
नवसारी गणदेवी
0-29-10 156
(जारी)
0-29-95
803
(जारी)
0-05-96 147
0-34-50
766
0-31-86 146
801
01-51-32 रोड
802
0-67-22 134
0-25-51
799
01-86-24 135
0-20-55
800
0-17-46 कारट्रेक
0-04-50
कुल
08-14-98 कुल
03-72-19
0-23-04
(13) खेरगाम 23
378
(12) घनोरी
0-13-21
24
0-24-77 379
0-33-94
रोड
0-10-36 374
0-06-98
25
0-49-54 321
0-07-64
31
0-29-05 केनाल
0-04-90
33
0-92-16 373
0-43-17
कारट्रेक
0-09-59 372
0-00-25
34
0-02-69 रोड
0-08-21
35
0-24-58 325
0-49-60
0-33-41
वेगनीया-रीवर ड्रेइन
0-08-21
02-99-19
कुल
326
0-15-16
(14) देसाड वेगनीया-रीवर 327
0-51-10
98
01-16-35 328
0-07-03
0-01-92
कारट्रेक
कारट्रेक
0-04-94
80
0-33-30 265
0-03-35
81
0-07-33 63
0-04-91
केनाल
0-08-73 264
0-44-53
81/पैकी
0-05-76 रोड
0-03-77
रेलवे
0-01-15 63/पैकी
0-11-79
82
0-16-50 96/1
0-62-72
रोड
98
0-34-22
0-08-78
243
केनाल
0-00-75
0-04-98
239
0-20-25 101
0-38-36
240
110
0-45-00
0-05-63
242
108
0-12-00
0-26-89
109
0-48-76
0-03-05
कारट्रेक
ड्रेइन
241
0-04-50
0-37-98 120
249
0-01-53
0-20-96 121
0-13-87
ड्रेइन
0-27-96
0-02-76
ड्रेइन
कुल
03-97-77 ड्रेइन
02-56-08
नवसारी
( 15) नांदरखा 774
गणदेवी
0-03-77 809
0-23-45
773/1
0-21-23 877
0-02-76
766/1
0-06-12 रोड
0-07-08
765/1
0-00-38 804
0-43-68 4366
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
2
3
1
4
5 नवसारी गणदेवी ( 15) नांदरखा
0-13-50
केनाल
0-02-99
( 16 ) उड़ाच 1836
नवसारी गणदेवी
766/2
0-04-61
(जारी)
0-01-50
(वीएफ) केनाल
765/2
0-07-19
1811
(जारी)
0-11-98 764/2
0-02-75
1810
0-14-97 767
0-27-31
1809
0-02-25 768
0-03-41
1807
0-07-48 748
0-01-60
1733
0-04-49 747
0-17-00
1734
0-05-24 740
0-45-04
1732
0-06-49 1315
0-38-68
1735
0-23-95 1314
0-17-15
1729
678
0-34-35
1728
0-02-25 676
0-06-80
1701
0-08-98 677
0-01-86
1702
0-04-59 673
1704
0-06-59 कारट्रेक
0-10-50
1703
0-05-99 668
0-25-82
1698
0-12-87 666
0-17-29
1692
0-03-59 619
0-10-13
1691
0-01-20 618
0-01-66
1690
0-03-37 617
0-03-28
0-17-96
1675
616
0-02-89
0-01-50
कारट्रेक
रोड
0-03-50
1682
0-16-96 615/2
0-00-58
1676
0-06-99 595/2
0-04-50
1680
0-04-49
0-03-46
कारट्रेक
1681
0-23-95 604/1
0-04-61
0-05-99
कारट्रेक
607
0-49-54
1601
0-18-81 606
0-01-01
1600
0-32-08 605
0-04-87
1594
0-13-47 601
0-13-36
1627
0-45-16 595/1
0-07-23
1626
0-00-75 602
0-01-73
1625
600
0-01-04
1588
0-10-98 599
0-10-77
1587.
0-03-99 कुल
04-30-60
1585
0-01-25
1584
0-12-32 (16) उडाच
1583
0-04-39
0-10-48
खाड़ी
(वीएफ)
1579
0-20-21 1825
0-04-99
1580
0-17-96 1823
0-19-26
1822
0-23-65
04-64-21
कुल:
1834
0-06-24
[फाइल सं . एल-14014/5/03-जी. पी. ] 1835
0-05-74
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 4367 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5
3
2
1
New Delhi , the 12th, June , 2003
0-39-17
Jalalpur
218
( 1 ) Nadod
Navsari
0-23-04
216
0-31-10
214
0-34-56
212
0-02-30
Road
0-06-91
196
0-27-65
197
0-11-52
198
0-17-28
204/p
0-16-13 S.O. 1699. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.1962 dated the 3rd June , 2002, issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of natural gas through Hazira-Uran Pipeline Project in the State of Gujarat by the GAIL (India) Limited;
Khadi
203
0-06-91
0-63-36
202
And, whereas, copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public from 2nd August, 2002 to 19th August, 2002;
0-11-52
131
0-40-32
132
0-22-40
134
And, whereas , the objections received from the public for laying of the pipeline have been duly considered and disallowed by the competent authority;
0-08-06
135
0-05-76
Road
0-11-52
109
And, whereas , the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report to the Central Government;
0-17-28
Canal
0-03-45
110
0-57-60
111
0-29-95
112
And , whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein .
0-34-56
116
0-32-26
117
0-08-06
237
06-20-01
Total:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
01-01-38
River
(2) Jalalpur
110/1
110/2/1
110/2/2
0-58-75
110/3 , 4, 5
111/1,2
111/3-1
111/3-2
111/3-3-1
And, further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead ofvesting in the Central Government, vest, on the date of the publication ofthe declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, proposing to lay the pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall , subject to the terms and conditions so imposed, vest in the GAIL ( India ) , free from all encumbrances .
0-07-49
111/3-3-2
SCHEDULE
0-51-84
109/1, 2, 3 , 4,5,6
Landto
Distt. Tehsil
Survey No./
Village
107/1-A-B
be acquired
Block No.
107/2-4-5
forR.O.U.
107/3-1
inHectares
0-50-69
107-3-2
4
5
3
2
1
108/1,2,3
0-05-18
4,5,6
0-07-80
Jalalpur (1) Nadod 232
Navsar:
106/1-1
235
0-39-17
106/1-2
236
0-10-37
1590 G1/03-13 4368
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II SEC . 3(ii )] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
0-34-56
Navsari Jalalpur (2) Jalalpur
0-33-99 106/2 , 3, 4, 5
425 / 1,2
Navsari Jalalpur (2) Jalalpur
81-1-1
396
81/ 1-2
0-06-34
396/p
81/2-3
0-38-02
395/1, 3 , 4, 5 82/1, 2, 3,
395/1-p
0-26-50
4,5,6,7,8
395/2-1 -p 82/6-A
395/2-2 -p
395/2-2 -p 79/1-1-1-1
395/2-1
0-42-62 79/1-1-1-2
79/ 1-1-2
394/1 -p
394/2
79/1-1-3
79/1-1-4
394/3
79/1-1-4
394/4
0-20-74 79/1-2
0-01-05
Cart-track 79/2-3-4
0-04-03
389/1
78/1, 2, 3, 4,
389/2
0-53-50
0-48-38
5,6,7
0-40-90
365/1 , 2 , 3 77/1,2,3,4
366/1-2
0-06-34
0-35-71
5,6,7,8
10-95-51
Total:
Drain
0-04-61
0-14-26 468/1-1
(3) Bhutsad 218
468/1-2
Road
0-05-94 468/2
0-21-89
182
0-96-23 466/1-1
185
0-19-58 466/1-2
187
0-14-98 466/2
0-26-50
188
0-14-98 465
0-15-68
118
0-51-84 462/1, 2, 3,
145
4,5
0-24-22
0-14-98
463
146
0-19-06
0-25-34
133
0-01-71 460/1 , 2, 3,
0-43-20
4,5,6
Road
0-10-41 458/1,2
0-26-50
93
0-40-32 457/ 1 -A-B
62
0-29-22
0-32-26
457/2,3
61
0-27-32 456/1
58
0-32-08 456/2
Khadi
0-06-91 456/2
0-47-23
59
0-14-40 455/1
60
0-14-40
0-16-00
455/2,3,4
451/1
Total
04-37-86 451/2
0-24-95
(4)Mandir 806
451/2
805
0-17-86 451/3 -A-B
0-33-41
Road
0-06-91 451/ 1,2 ,
3,4
0-41-47
821
0-03-07
0-28-80
448/1,2,3
830
0-20-73 427
0-31-10
829
0-23-04
0-18-43
426/ 1,2,3
828
0-02-88 .4369 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0-22-60
0-11-52
2341
Navsari Jalalpur ( 5) Abrama
Canal
Navsari Jalalpur (4) Mandir
0-03-84
2297
0-08-06
828/p
0-03-07
2337
0-33-28
827
2338
0-04-60
826
0-09-58
2336
0-14-98
Canal
0-23-35
2335
0-05-94
849
0-01-80
2334
0-03-46
879
0-17-86
0-21-89
878
2376
0-23-75
0-08-06
877
2375
0-20-74
876
0-14-50
2400
0-02-88
868
0-07-68
2399
0-06-91
875
0-14-80
2403
0-27-32
869
0-01-25
2398
0-01-73
870
0-01-30
2397
0-03-46
871
0-28-04
2404
0-40-08
863
0-14-72
2405
0-09-22
862
0-04-80
2407
0-09-21
Road
0-28-90
2408
0-38-71
934
0-03-46
Road
0-05-76
935
0-14-30
2510
0-09-50
939
0-37-60
2514
0-14-98
937
0-07-68
2508/1
0-06-91
Road
0-11-52
Road
859
0-35-64
0-10-37
2508/2
0-10-36
950
0-02-88
2501/2
0-05-76
966
0-23-04
2500
0-16-13
965
0-22-84
2499/1
964
0-14-97
0-21-95
2491/2
0-12-67
963
0-05-76
2884/2
0-03-84
953
0-06-91
Road
0-04-75
962
0-40-90
0-10-69
2484/1
954
0-04-80
0-52-27
2479
955
0-21-62
0-00-15 956
2480
0-13-25
957
0-31-90
2478
0-22-16
Khadi
0-05-76
Road
0-00-38
309
06-32-77
Total:
0-18-20
319
0-42-30
(5) Abrama Khadi
0-00-57
318
0-01-15
2293/2
0-09-60
317
0-12-09
2293/1
316
0-14-98
0-18-43 2294
0-15-00
Road
0-10-75
2343
0-19-30
0-09-60
314
2295
0-26-50
0-20-01
327
2296 4370
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
0-14-40
Navsari Jalalpur (5) Abrama 326
0-24-00
685
Navsari Jalalpur ( 6) Vedchha
334/1
0-43-78
(Contd.)
0-31-50
(Contd.) 686
335
0-11-52
687
0-22-50 338
0-09-60
Road
0-04-50 339/1
0-15-94
646
0-61-08 341
0-29-76
641
0-28-50 342/1
0-01-35
625
0-18-00
Canal
0-14-13 Total:
08-29-87
626
0-24-00
0-02-50
(6) Vedchha 1036
601
0-15-00 1035
0-32-00
1038
0-04-80
Total:
08-05-47 1039
0-34-20
188
01-11-67
Gandevi (7) Kolva
1040
0-27-00
191
0-15-49 1041
0-05-25
190
0-57-02 1029
0-12-75
204
0-42-77 1028
0-01-50
256
0-11-88 D-Canal
205
0-21-41 1027
0-12-00
255
0-38-02 1042
0-22-50
Cart-track
0-07-13 1026
0-07-50
254
0-01-83 1009
0-13-50
223
0-45-14 1043
253
0-23-76 1008
0-37-06
224
0-64-15
0-03-31
Rly
221
0-07-96 975
0-13-50
225
0-28-51 969
0-24-00
226
0-07-08 974
0-46-06
227
0-19-01 Road
0-04-50
232
809
0-12-00
231
0-09-50 810
0-18-00
230
0-23-76 811
0-26-00
228
0-01-28 802
0-05-50
233
0-03-42 800
0-99-79
217/A
799
0-24-00
215
0-76-03 791
0-25-65
326
0-99-79 792
0-05-50
Cart-track
0-07-13 793
Total:
08-23-62 794
Canal
0-04-75 781
(8) Salej
0-37-50
119
0-09-61 683
0-16-65
120
0-32-07 680
0-08-45
682
Cart-track
0-02-38
0-15-40
123
Canal
0-15-44
0-05-56
125
684
0-73-66
0-43-50 4371 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4
5
2
3
5
1
2
4
3
1
0-18-41 131
0-29-70
Gandevi (9) Ichhapur 217
Navsari
Gandevi (8) Salej
Navsari
*
0-32-07
0-03-56
134
(Contd.) 220
(Contd.)
0-06-36
Road
0-02-38
Road
0-26-75
584
0-02-19
132
0-20-96
608
0-04-75
Road
0-11-28
607
253
0-05-05
0-06-04
587
252
0-39-91
0-20-79
588
258
0-10-69
0-05-02
Drain
259
0-05-94
0-11-88
589
0-08-32
260
0-08-91
590
261
0-19-01
0-03-56
605
0-04-75
245
0-32-08
592
0-09-50
243
0-01-13
594
0-14-26
242
0-02-08
593
241
0-09-50
0-49-17
River
0-19-01
239
0-15-44
06-92-56 237/A
Total:
0-15-44
237/B
(10)Manek-
0-50-69 236
0-07-13
River
pur
0-23-04
49
03-63-44
Total:
0-04-50
51
0-18-41
(9) Ichhapur 321
88
0-14-40 320
0-00-59
0-25-34
90
0-10-69
322
95
0-17-28 317
0-17-82
0-16-50
127/p
316
0-08-91
Road
0-21-38
281
0-04-03
89
0-05-94
280
0-12-00
127
0-24-35
279
0-00-75
128
0-15-44
278
01-71-53
Total:
0-25-54
277
0-31-50
0-08-91
276
103
(11)Gadat
0-08-25
102
0-05-94
275
0-32-06
Canal
0-09-50
274
0-06-75
104
0-48-68
271
0-05-25
100
0-09-47
Cart-track
0-06-75
98
0-38-01
266
0-04-50
97
0-01-33
265
0-02-25
108
263
0-19-00
0-19-58
96
0-01-44
264
0-24-00
109
0-16-03
178
0-09-75
113
0-29-10
254
0-04-50
112
0-09-31
180
0-02-25
114
0-35-64
201
Road
0-10-49
0-54-64
216 4372
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
0-00-75
115
Navsari Gandevi ( 11 ) Gadat
0-02-76
Navsari Gandevi ( 12) Dhanori 877
160
(Contd.)
0-08-50
Road
0-07-08
(Contd.)
0-17-28
158.
804
0-43-68 157
0-53-76
805
0-29-10 156
0-29-95
803
0-05-96 147
0-34-50
766
0-31-86 146
801
01-51-32 Road
802
02-67-72 134
0-25-51
799
01-86-24 135
0-20-55
800
0-17-46 Cart-track
0-04-50
Total:
08-14-98 Total:
03-72-19
23
0-23-04
(13)Khergam
( 12) Dhanori 378
0-13-21
24
0-24-77 379
0-33-94
Road
0-10-36 374
0-06-98
25
0-49-54 321
0-07-64
31
0-29-05 Canal
0-04-90
33
0-92-16 373
0-43-17
Cart-track
0-09-59 372
0-00-25
34
0-02-69 Road
0-08-21
35
0-24-58 325
0-49-60
Drain
0-08-21
Vegniya-
River
0-33-41 326
0-15-16
327
Total:
02-99-19
0-51-10
328
0-07-03
( 14) Desad Vegniya-
Cart-track
River
0-04-94
265
0-03-35
98
01-16-35 63
0-04-91
Cart-track
0-01-92 264
0-44-53
80
0-33-30 Road
0-03-77
81
0-07-33
0-11-79
63/p
Canal
0-08-73 96/1
0-62-72
0-05-76
81/p
98
0-34-22
0-01-15
Rly
Canal
0-04-98
82
0-16-50 101
0-38-36
Road
0-08-78 110
0-05-63
243
0-00-75 108
0-26-89
239
0-20-25 109
0-48-76
240
0-45-00 Drain
0-04-50
242
0-12-00 120
0-01-53
Car-track
0-03-05 121
0-13-87
241
0-37-98 Drain
0-02-76
249
0-20-96 Drain
02-56-08
Drain
0-27-96 809
0-23-45
Total:
03-97-77 4373 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
1
2
0-06-24
Gandevi (16) Undach 1834
Navsari
Gandevi ( 15) Nan-
Navsari
0-05-74
0-03-77
darkha 774
(VF) (Contd. ) 1835
0-02-99
1836
0-21-23
773/1
0-01-50
Canal
0-06-12
766/1
0-11-98
1811
0-00-38
765/1
0-14-97
0-13-50
1810
Canal
0-02-25 766/2
1809
0-04-61
0-07-48
0-07-19
765/2
1807
0-04-49
0-02-75
764/2
1733
0-05-24 767
0-27-31
1734
0-06-49
0-03-41
1732
768
0-23-95
0-01-60
748
1735
0-17-00
747
1729
0-02-25
0-45-04
740
1728
0-38-68
0-08-98 1315
1701
0-04-49
0-17-15
1314
1702
0-34-35
0-06-59 678
1704
0-06-80
0-05-99 676
1703
0-01-86
0-12-87 677
1698
0-03-59 673
1692
0-01-20
0-10-50
Cart-Track
1691
0-25-82
0-03-37 668
1690
0-17-29
0-17-96 666
1675
0-10-13
0-01-50 619
Cart-track
0-01-66
618
0-16-96
1682
0-03-28
617
0-06-99
1676
0-02-89
616
0-04-49
1680
0-03-50
0-23-95 Road
1681
0-00-58
0-05-99 615/2
Cart-track
0-04-50
595/2
0-18-81
1601
0-03-46
Cart-Track
0-32-08
1600
0-04-61
604/1
0-13-47
1594
0-49-54
607
0-45-16
1627
0-01-01
606
0-00-75
1626
0-04-87
605
1625
0-13-36
601
0-10-98
1588
0-07-23
595/1
0-03-99
1587
0-01-73
602
0-01-25
1585
600
0-01-04
0-12-32
1584
0-10-77
599
0-04-39
1583
0-20-21
1579
04-30-60
Total:
0-17-96
1580
(16)Undach
0-10-48
Khadi
04-64-21 (VF)
Total:
0-04-99
1825
[F. No. L- 14014/5/2003 -G.P. ]
0-19-26
1823
0-23-65
1822
SWAMI SINGH, Director 4374
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1700.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1963 तारीख , 03 जून, 2002 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में हजीरा- उरान पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 16 अगस्त, 2002 से 12 सितम्बर, 2002 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;
और उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा सम्यक् रूप से विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित किए गए निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इंडिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला
सर्वे नं.
तहसील गॉव
उ.का.अ. के लिए
अर्जित की जाने
वाली भूमि
(हेक्टेयर में) 1
2
3
4
5 बलसाड
17 वागल
बलसाड
0-42-17 धारा
0-01-39
0-06-34
637 636 खाड़ी
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1
3
2
4
5
रोड
बलसाड बलसाड वागल-
0-07-12
601
धारा-जारी
0-21-74
600
0-02-53
रीवर
0-32-08
365
0-43-74
366
372
0-03-56
364
0-29-41
371
377
0-07-60
363
0-13-78
कारट्रेक 0-02-97
380
0-21-50
379
0-02-50
428
0-14-73
381
0-08-55
407
0-06-73
383
0-24-95
406
0-19-01
390
0-23-88
404
0-00-59
403
0-02-85
391
0-22-44
केनाल 0-07-12
129
0-05-15
130
0-16-23
128/पैकी
0-28-51
कारट्रेक 10-03-56
127
121
0-25-89
122
0-36-83
124
0-21-38
कुल
05-15-83 18 : गोरगाम
910
0-09-12
911
0-10-74
912
0-59-78
923
0-07-63
919
0-19-58
918
0-16-13
917
0-42-62
949
0-39-17
950
0-08-56
951
0-14-98
952
0-11-85 4375 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
5
2
3
5
1
4
2
3
1
0-06-52
19: सोनवाडा 151
बलसाड पारडी
0-04-03
953
18 गोरगाम-जारी
बलसाड
0-05-14
152
-जारी
0-09-22
954
0-11-28
253/1,2,3,4
0-03-75
955
0-20-19
254
0-03-46
रोड
0-14-25
257/ 1,2,3
0-30-19
883
258/1,2,3 0-07-12
0-02-30
कारट्रेक
262/1,2,3 0-07-12
0-51-33
882
0-07-75
261
0-34-92
881
0-10-09
267/1,2
0-04-61
कारट्रेक
0-21-38
265/1,2
0-43-78
217
0-11-48
274/1.2,3
215
0-10-69
275/1,2,3
केनाल 0-02-30
4,5,6
0-20-74
236
0-09-90
273/4,5,6
0-25-34
237
0-02-37
276
0-03-46
केनाल
0-09-50
277
0-27-50
158
0-11-88
278
247
0-19-00
279/1
0-29-95
150
कारट्रेक
0-26-50
151
0-09-70
389
0-11-52
152
0-06-33
388
0-05-76
कारट्रेक
0-01-58
390
0-12-67
103
0-16-63
396/1,2.
0-19-50
116
0-13-86
397/1,2
0-63-36
105
0-12-48
387
119
387/पैकी 0-12-48
0-08-50
120
0-19-60
402
0-69-12
121
0-24-94
403
0-05-50
123/पैकी
0-34-24
405/2-अ
0-04-61
केनाल
0-40-60
406
07-98-87
कुल
0-33-26
407
0-38-60
414
0-21-38
19 : खाडी
पारडी
बलसाड
0-31-77
415
0-08-50
सोनवाडा 140/1-2
0-52-86
416/5-अ
0-19-00
141
463
0-13-06
142
0-40-39
463/पैकी
0-35-04
163
0-16-90
462/1
0-24-94
162
0-10-69
462/2,3
0-26-96
144/1,2,34 ,
0-20-63
खाडी
0-02-40 5,6,7,8
461
0-00-79
159/1,2
09-04-64
कुल
0-00-61
158
0-26-73
259
20: लवाछा
0-21-71
145
0-44-55
258
0-08-80
146/1
0-21-03
260:1-2
0-17-22
147/1-2
256
49-06
10-45
255
0-21-97
155/1,2,3
0-37-07
201
0-43-75
150
04-50
केनाल
0-15-29
केनाल
1590 G1/03-14 4376
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3
2
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 वलसाड पारडी 20 लवाछा 231
0-70-89
0-30-88
वलसाड पारडी 21 : नानीतंबाडी269/5
जारी
0-30-89
-जारी 270
229/1,2
230/1
270
0-27-56 230/2-3 -पैकी0-14-26
0-12-83
271
228
0-01-58
248/1-पैकी
227
0-21-38
248/2
226
0-18-77
248/1 वत्ता 2- पैकी 225
0-02-61
248/1 वत्ता2- पैकी 268
0-27-32
0-07-13
248/1 वत्ता2- पैकी 291
0-03-56
रोड
0-04-75 290
0-12-66
289
0-50-29
247/पैकी
रोड
0-05-94
247/पैकी
0-35-64 298
0-15-08
244/1
299/1,2,3 0-16-77
244/2
297/पैकी
244/3
297/1-पैकी
244/4
297/2-पैकी
244/5-1
297/3 0-03-17
244/5-2
0-24-56 304
0-19-44
276/1-पैकी
301/1,2,3 0-04-63
303
0-38-02
276/1-पैकी
305
0-33-26
276/1-पैकी
308/1,2
276/1-3-पैकी
308/3/2
276/1-3-पैकी
308/3-5 0-10-93
309
0-71-28
276/1-4-पैकी
रीवर
0-19-01
276/4-2
276/4-3
321
0-06-40
316
276/5
0-17-80
311
276/6
0-11-08
0-14-28
315
0-41-58
240/1-पैकी
240/1-पैकी
(17-65-20
कुल
240/1-पैकी
21: नानीतंबाडी रीवर
0-19-00
240/2
263/1-पैकी
0-99-79
240/3
263/1-पैकी
0-09-50
रोड
263/2-3-4-5
0-63-20
315
0-23-76 264/पैकी
318
0-28-51 264/पैकी
317
0-30-89 264/पैकी
0-09-50
328
264/पैकी
0-05-70
329/पैकी
272
0-11-88
269/1-1
329/पैकी
269/1-2-पैकी
329/पैकी
269/1-3-पैकी
329
269/1-4-पैकी
329
0-35-64 269/1-5-पैकी
330/पैकी
269/2
269/3
330/पैकी
0-09-50 269/4
रोड
0-07-13 4377 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
1
2
3
4
5
3
1
2
वलसाड पारडी 21 : नानीतंबाडी 372/5
0-19-01
331/ 1,2,3
वलसाड पारडी 21 : नानीतंबाडी
372/6
332/1,2,3
4,5,6,7,
372/
8,9,10,
7372/8/पैकी
0-17-82
11, 12, 13
0-68-90
372/8
333/पैकी
371/1
333/पैकी
371/1
371/2
333/पैकी
371/3
0-24-95
333/पैकी
371/4
334/1
0-13-31
371/5
334/2
0-04-75
ड्रेइन
334/3-1
363/1
0-07-13
334/3-2
363/2-1
335/1 , 2, 3 ,
363/2-2
335/4-1
363/4-3
335/4-2
363/3
335/4-3
363/5
335/4-4
363/6/1
335/4-5
363/6/2
0-12-33
335/4-6
0-11-88
363/7
0-19-01
ड्रेइन
0-16-62
362
338/1
34/पैकी
338/2
0-43-21
34/पैकी
338/3-1
33/पैकी
338/3-2
0-14-97
0-16-06
33/पैकी
337/1
35
0-12-00 337/2-1
37/1-पैका
337/2-2
37/2
337/2-3
0-23-76
57/1-पैकी
337/3/1
337/3/2
08-98-30
कुल
0-05-25
22: खोरलाव 51
50
337/4
50/पैकी
337/5-2
50/पैकी
337/5-1
0-23-76
50/पैकी
337/7-1
0-00-75
46
0-35-64
337/7,8,9
0-01-78
44
0-04-75
रकेड
0-03-56
रोड
0-23-76
368
43/2
372/1 -अ
43/2
372/1 -ब
43/1-ब
372/ 1-क
43/1-अ
372/2
0-43-96
43/1-अ-पैकी 372/3
42
372/4 4378
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] 1
4
2
3
5
1
2
4
3
5 बलसाड पारडी ( 22 ) खोरलाद 42/पैकी
0-11-88
0-14-26
बलसाड
पारडी
(23 ) अंबाच 3,4
-जारी
41
-जारी
0-32-08
776/1,2,3,4 41/पैकी
0-11-88
गवर्मेन्ट-लेन्ड 0-15-44 40
778/1
40/पैकी
0-15-44
778/2
36
788/2-पैकी
36/पैकी
778/2-पैकी
36/पैकी
778/2
36/पैकी
0-14-26
778/3,4,
0-21-00
5,6
35/
772
35/पैकी
0-29-70
779/पैकी
27
0-03-56
28
779/पैकी
0-20-89 28/पैकी
रोड
0-04-50 28/पैकी
770
0-49-90
769
02-15-68
कुल
769/पैकी
गाडी
(23)
769/पैकी
अंबाच
769/पैकी
869/1- पैकी
769/पैकी
869/2- पैकी
769/पैकी
0-51-00 869/2
869/1
0-37-50
763/पैकी-1-2 870/1-पैकी
763/2-क
870/2-पैकी
763/2 -व
870/1-पैकी 0-15-00
763/2-अ
872/पैकी
763/4
763/3
872/पैकी
763/2-5
872
0-15-01
0-59-40
740/1
873
0-13-07
740/1-पैकी
879
0-24-00
740/1-पैकी
878
0-04-75
740/1-पैकी
877/1 , 2 ,
3.4
0-33-00
740/2
876/1,2 ,
740/2-पैकी
3,4
0-07-50
740/2- पैकी
796/पैकी
740/3-पैकी
796/पैकी
740/3
796/पैकी
740/3 -मैकी
795/1,2,3 ,
740/3-पैकी 0-09-35 4,5,6,7 ,
741/पैकी
0-21-57 8,9,10
743/3
795/8-पैकी 0-10-69
743/ 1,2,
775/1,2,
4.5.6
0-02-25 4379 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
बलसाड
(23 ) अंबाच 748/पैकी
पारडी
बलसाड
742/5
(23 ) अंबाच
पारडी
0-04-49
748/पैकी
-जारी
742/3/5 वत्ता
-जारी
714/1
4/1
714/2-1
742/1/2 वत्ता
714/2/2-ब
2/1
0-52-50
714/2/2-अ
742/1 -अ
567/पैकी
742/1 -ब
567/पैकी
742/7/पैकी
567/पैकी
742/1/1/अ
0-45-00
567/पैकी
742/3/2-अ
566/3 -ब
742/3/2/अ
566/3 -ब
742/3/2 -ब
566/2
742/3/4 वत्ता
0-16-45
566/1
4/2
0-04-15
568
742/3/4 वत्ता
571/3
4/2
571/2-2-ब
742/7/पैकी
571/1-2-1
742/7-पैकी
0-02-87
571/1
0-82-92
742/6
0-55-50
569
744/1
549/पैकी
744/2/1
549/3
744/3
549/2-अ
744/4
549/1
744/5
0-09-50
744/6
0-11-40
549/2-ब
749/2
कारट्रेक
0-08-32
749/1
546/पैकी
750/1-ब
546/पैकी
750/1-पैकी
546/पैकी
750/1-अ
0-09-74
546/पैकी
750/2-ब
548/1
750/2-अ
548/1 -पैकी
750/3 -अ
548/2
750/4
548/3-अ
750/4
0-63-75
548/3 -ब
750/5
547/2
750/11
547/1-पैकी
750/8,9
547/1-पैकी
750/7
0-38-02
कोलक रीवर 750/12, 13 , 14
750/15, 16, 17
515/1
750/18, 19
515/2,3,4
0-13-50 750/3 -ब
515/3
514/1
750/3-अ
0-19-48
514/2
0-45-00
750/6 4380
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
पारडी
बलसाड
(23) अंबाच कार्ट- ट्रैक
513
0-21-38
the declaration, in the GAIL ( India) Limited , proposing to lay the pipeline and thereupon the right of such user in the land shall , subject to the terms and conditions so imposed, vest in the GAIL ( India) , free from all encumbrances .
0-14-26
528/1,2,4
SCHEDULE
527
0-11-62
0-23-76
529/1,2,3
Dist. Tehsil Village
530/पैकी
Survey No./ Block No.
530/पैकी
0-40-39
Land to be acquired for R.O.U. in Hectares.
510
510/2-1
1
2
3
4
5 510/2-2
0-22-62
Valsad Valsad ( 17)
0-42-17
11-09-88
कुल
Vagaldhara 637
636
0-01-39 [फा. सं. एल-14014/5/03-जी. पी. ]
Khadi
0-06-34
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक
Road
0-07-12 New Delhi , the 12th June, 2003
601
0-21-74
600
0-02-53
River
0-32-08
365
0-43-74
366
372
0-03-56
364
0-29-41
371
377
0-07-60
363
0-13-78 S.O. 1700 .-- Whereasby notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1963 dated the 03rd June , 2002, issued under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of natural gas through Hazira -Uran Pipeline Project in the State of Gujaratby the GAIL ( India ) Limited;
Cart-track 0-02-97
380
0-21-50
379
0-02-50 And, whereas , copies of the said Gazette notifications were made available to the public from 16th August, 2002 to 12th September, 2002;
428
0-14-73
381
0-08-55
407
0-06-73 And, whereas , the objections received from the public for laying of the pipeline have been duly considered and disallowed by the competent authority;
383
0-24-95
406
0-19-01
390
0-23-88 And, whereas , the competent authority has , under Sub- section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government ;
404
0-00-59
403
0-02-85
391
0-22-44
Canal
0-07-12 And, whereas, the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the sand land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein .
129
0-05-15
130
0-16-23
0-28-51
128/p
Cart -track 0-03-56
127
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
121
0-25-89
122
0-36-83
124
0-21-38
Total
05-15-83 And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest, on the date of the publication of 4381 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
3
1
2
5
4
1
3
2
Pardi
144/1,2,3 0-26-96 Valsad Valsad ( 18 )
Valsad
(19)
0-09-42
910
4,5,6,7,8
Sonwada
Gorgam
0-10-74
0-00-79 911
159/1-2
*158
0-59-78
0-00-61 912
0-21-71
145
0-07-63
923
0-08-80
146/1
0-19-58
919
0-17-22
147/1-2
0-16-13
918
1-21-97
155/1,2,3
0-42-62
917
0-43-75
150
0-39-17
949
0-15-29
Canal
0-08-56
950
0-06-52
151
0-14-98
951
0-05-14
152
0-11-85
952
0-11-28
253/1,2,3,4 953
0-04-03
0-20-19
254
954
0-09-22
0-14-25
257/1,2,3
0-03-75
955
0-07-12
258/1,2,3
0-03-46
Road
0-07-12
262/1 , 2 , 3
883
0-30-19
0-07-75
261
0-02-30
Cart-track
0-10-09
267/1,2
0-51-33
0-21-38 882
265/1,2
0-11-48
0-34-92
881
274/1 , 2 , 3
0-10-69
0-04-61
275/1 , 2 , 3 ,
Cart -track
4,5,6
0-43-78
217
0-09-90
273/4,5,6
215
0-02-37
276
0-02-30
Canal
0-09-50
277
0-20-74
236
0-11-88
278
0-25-34
237
0-19-00
279/1
0-03-46
Canal
0-00-02
Cart -track
0-27-50
158
0-09-70
389
247
0-06-33
388
0-29-95
150
0-01-58
390
0-26-50
151
0-16-63
396/1,2
0-11-52
152
0-13-86
397/ 1,2
0-05-76
Cart-track
0-12-48
387
0-12-67
103
0-12-48
387/P
0-19-50
116
0-19-60
402
-63-36
105
0-24-94
403
119
0-34-24
405/2 -A
0-08-50
120
0-40-60
406
0-69-12
121
0-33-26
407
0-05-50
0-38-60
414
123/p
0-04-61
Canal
0-31-77
415
0-52-86
416/5-A
07-98-87
Total
463
0-21-38
Khadi
Pardi (19)
0-40-39
463/P
0-08-50
140/1-2
Sonwada
0-16-90
462/1
0-10-69
0-19-00
141
462/2,3
0-20-63
0-13-06
142
Khadi
0-02-40
461
0-35-04
163
0-24-94
09-04-64
Total
162 4382
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Pardi
Valsad
(20) Lawa-
Valsad Pardi
269/1/4/p
(21 ) Nani-
259
chha
0-26-73
trambadi- 269/ 1 / 5 /p
258
0-44-55
269/2
(Contd.)
0-21-03
260/ 1,2
269/3
256
0-49-06
269/4
255
0-10-45
269/5
0-30-88 261
0-37-07
270
Canal
0-04-50
270
0-27-56 231
0-70-89
271
0-12-83 229/ 1,2 0-30-89
248/1/p
230/1
248/2
230/2/3/p 0-14-26
248/1+2/p
228
0-01-58
248/1+2/p
227
0-21-38
226
0-18-77
248/1+2/p 0-07-13
Road
0-04-75 225
0-02-61
247/p
268
0-27-32
0-35-64
247/p
291
0-03-56
244/1
290
0-12-66
244/2
289
0-50-29
244/3
Road
0-05-94
244/4
298
0-15-08
244/5/1
299/1,2,3 , 0-16-77
244/5/2 0-24-56 297/p
276/1/p
297/1 /p
276/1/p
297/2/p
276/1 /p
297/3
0-03-17
276/1/3 /p
304
0-19-44
276/1/3/p
301/1,2,3 , 0-04-63
276/1/4/p
303
0-38-02
276/4/2
305
0-33-26
276/4/3
308/1,2
276/5
308/3/2
276/6
0-11-08
0-10-93
308/3-5
240/1/p
309
0-71-28
240/1/p
0-19-01
River
240/1/p
321
0-06-40
240/2
316
0-17-80
240/3
0-99-79 311
0-14-28
Road
0-09-50 315
0-41-58
315
0-23-76
07-65-20
Total
318
0-28-51 Pardi (21) Nani-
317
0-30-89 River
Trambadi
0-19-00
328
0-09-50 263/1/p
329/p
263/1/p
264/2,3,4,5 0-63-20
329/p
264/p
329/p
264/p
329
264/p
329
0-35-64
0-05-70
264/p
330/p
272
0-11-88
0-09-50
330/p
269/1/1
Road
0-07-13 269/1/2/p
269/1/3/p
331/1,2,3 0-19-01 4383 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
2
3
1
4
5
2
3
1
Pardi
Valsad
372/7
0-19-01
Valsad Pardi
332/1,2,3 ,
(21) Nani-
(21 ) Nani-
372/8/P
4,5,6,7 ,
trambadi
trambadi
8, 9 , 10,
(Contd. )
0-68-90
372/8
(Contd.)
0-17-82
11 , 12, 13
371/1
333/p
371/1
333/p
371/2
371/3
333/p
371/4
0-24-95
333/p
0-13-31
371/5
334/1
0-04-75
Drain
334/2
363/1
334/3-1
363/2/1
0-07-13
334/3-2
363/2/2
335/1 , 2, 3 ,
363/4/3
335/4/1
363/3
335/4/2
363/5
335/4/3
363/6/1
335/4/4
363/6/2
335/4/5
0-11-88
0-12-33
363/7
335/4/6
0-16-63
362
0-19-01
Drain
34/p
338/1
0-43-21 338/2
34/p
338/3/1
333/p
0-14-97
0-16-06 338/3/2
33/p
337/1
0-12-00
35
337/2/1
37/1 /p
337/2/2
37/2
337/2/3
0-23-76
37/1 /p
337/3/1
08-98-30
Total
337/3/2
Valsad Pardi (22)
0-05-25
Khcrlav 51
50
337/4
50/p
337/5-2
50/p
337/5-1
0-23-76
50/p
337/7-1
0-00-75
46
0-35-64
337/7,8,9
0-01-78
44
0-04-75
Road
0-03-56
Road
0-23-76
368
43/2
372/ 1 - A
43/2
372/ 1 -B
43/1-B
372/ 1 -K
43/ 1 -A
372/2
0-43-96
43/ 1 -A- p
372/3
42
372/4
0-11-88
42/ p
372/5
41
372/6
1590 G1 /03-15 4384
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 1
2
4
3
5
1
2
3
4
5 Valsad Pardi
0-11-88
41/p
(22) Kherlav
Valsad Pardi
(23) Ambach 778/2
40
(Contd.)
(Contd.) 778/3,4,5,6 0-21-00
0-15-44
40/p
772
36
779/p
36/p
0-20-89
779/p
36/p
0-14-26
Road
36/p
0-04-50 27
0-03-56
770
35
769
0-29-70
35/p
769/p
28
769/p
28/p
769/p
0-49-90
28/p
769/p
Total
02-15-68
0-51-00
769/p
Khadi
(23)
763/p/1-2
869/1 /p
Ambach
763/2 -K
869/1 /p
869/2
763/2-B
869/1
0-37-50
763/2 -A
870/1 /p
763/4
870/2/p
763/3
763/2/D 0-15-01
0-15-00
870/1 /p
740/1
872/p
740/1/p
872/p
872
740/1 /p
0-59-40
873
740/1 /p
0-13-07
740/2
879
0-24-00
878
0-04-75
740/2/p
877/1,2
740/2/p
3,4
0-33-00
740/3/p
876/1,2,
740/3
3,4
0-07-50
740/3 /p
796/p
740/3/p
796/p
0-21-57
741/p
796/p
743/3
795/1, 2, 3 ,
743/1,2,
4,5,6,7,
0-02-25
4,5,6
8,9,10
742/5
0-10-69
795/8/p
742/3/5+4/1
775/1,2,3,4 0-14-26
742/1/2+2/ 1
0-32-08
776/1,2,3,4
742/1 /A
Govt. land 0-15-44
742/1/B
778/1
742/7/p
778/2
742/1 / 1 /A
778/2/p
742/3/2/A
778/2/p 4385 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1
2
4
5
3
1
2
3
4
5
Valsad Pardi (23) Ambach 566/2
Valsad Pardi (23 ) Ambach 742/3 /2/A
566/1
0-16-45
(Contd.)
742/3/2/B
(Contd.)
568
0-04-15 742/3/4+4/2
571/3
742/3/4+4/2
571/2/2/B
742/7/p
571/1/2/1
742/7/ p
571/1
0-02-87 742/6
0-82-92
569
0-55-50 744/1
549/p
744/2/1
549/3
744/3
549/2/A
744/4
549/1
744/5
744/6
549/2/B 0-11-40
0-09-50
749/2
Cart -trach 0-06-00 749/1
0-08-32
546/ p
750/1-B
546/p
750/A/P
546/p
750/1 /A
0-09-74
546/p
750/2/B
548/1
750/2 /A
548/ 1 /P
750/3 /A
548/2
750/4
548/2/P
750/4
548/3 /A
750/5
548/3/B 0-63-75 750/11
547/2
750/8,9
547/1 /P
750/7
547/1/P
750/12, 13 , 14,
Kolak -River 0-38-02 750/15 , 16 , 17,
515/1
750/18 , 19
515/2,3,4
750/3/B
515/13
0-13-50 750/3/A
514/1
0-45-00
750/6
0-19-48
514/2
748/p
Cart-track 0-09-00
0-04-49
748/p
513
0-21-38 714/1
0-14-26
528/1,2,4
714/2/1
527
0-11-62 714/2/ 2/B
0-23-76
529/1,2,3
714/ 2/2/A 0-52-50
530/p
0-40-39 567/ p
530/p
510
567/p
510/2/1
567/p
510/2/2
0-22-62
0-45-00
567/p
Total
11-09-88 566/3/B
[File No. L - 14014/5/03 -G.P. ] 566/3/B
SWAMI SINGH , Director [PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31, 1925
4386
New Delhi , the 11th June , 2003 नई दिल्ली, 11 जून, 2003
S.O. 1701. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , published in the Gazette of India vide number S. O. 371 dated the 29th January, 2003 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act . 1962 (50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Saharanpur to Najibabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
का.आ. 1701. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय कीअधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 371 तारीख , 29 जनवरी , 2003 द्वारा , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में सहारनपुर से नजीबाबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए उस अधिसूचना सेसंलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
Andwhereas , copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the public on 21-02-2003;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की राजपत्रित प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 21 फरवरी , 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
Andwhereas , the competent authority in pursuance of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report to the Central Government; और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( I ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification isacquired;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
And, further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right ofuser in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
SCHEDULE
अनुसूची
State: Uttar Pradesh
District : Bijnor
Tehsil : Najibabad
राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश
जिला: बिजनौर
तहसील: नजीबाबाद
Area
KhasraNo.
Village
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा संख्या
गांद
Hectare Are Centiare
आर सेंटीआर
हेक्टयर
3
4
2
1
5
3
4
2
1
44
16
0
88
Nagla Sembal
16
44
0
88
नगला संग्बल
99
32
0
13
Rahukheri Kaura
0
99
13
32
राह बेड़ाकौरा
09
23
0
36
0
23
09
36
00
04
0
37
00
0
04
37
00 40
0
104
00
0
40
104
[No. R- 25011/ 1 /2003 -OR -IJ [संख्या आर-25011/1/2003- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव 4387 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
NewDelhi , the 11th June, 2003 नई दिल्ली, 11 जून, 2003
S.O. 1702. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 372 dated the 29-1-2003 , issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act . 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Saharanpur to Najibabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
का. आ. 1702.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 372 तारीख , 29-01-2003 द्वारा , इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में सहारनपुर से नजीबाबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को तारीख 21 फरवरी , 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
Andwhereas, copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the public from the 21st February, 2003;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
Andwhereas , the competent authority in pursuance ofsub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , has submitted his report to the Central Government ;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification isacquired;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
And, further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right ofuser in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
अनुसूची
SCHEDULE
राज्य: उत्तर प्रदेश
जिला: सहारनपुर
तहसील :सहारनपुर
State: Uttar Pradesh
Tehsil: Saharanpur District: Saharanpur
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा संख्या
गांव
Area
KhasraNo.
Village
आर सेंटीआर
हेक्टेयर
Are Centiare
Hectare
4
5
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0
10
39
286
गागल हेड़ी एहतमाल
39
286
0
10
Gagalheri Athmal
15
92
0
55
92
15 नांगल
0
55
Nangal
00
00
72
0
72
96
0
96
Chauradev
चौरादेव
00
0
67
67
00
0
842
842
00
25
0
843
25
0
00
843
20
37
0
849
20
0
37
849
09
0
16
851
09
16
0
851
[No.R-25011/4/2003 -OR- I] [संख्या आर-25011/4/2003- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव 4388
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC.3 ( ii ) ] नईदिल्ली, 13 जून, 2003
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2003
S.O. 1703. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 82 dated the 6th January, 2003 issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification , for the purpose of laying pipelines for transport of petroleum products from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra-Bathinda crude oil pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (asubsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) ;
का. आ. 1703.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 82 तारीख, 6-01-2003 द्वारा , इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमिमें गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के, माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण की थी;
And,whereas, copies of the said Gazette notification weremade available to the public on the 1st February, 2003;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को तारीख 1 फरवरी, 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
And, whereas , the competent authority has , under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government ;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
And, whereas, the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्और यहसमाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline .
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन कीतारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest , on the date of publication of the declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited), free from all encumbrances .
अनुसूची
SCHEDULE
तहसील: खीवंसर जिला: नागौर राज्य : राजस्थान
Tehsil: Khinwsar District :Nagaur State: Rajasthan क्रम गाँव का नाम खसरा नं.
S. No. Name of Khasra No. Party ROU - Area सं.
हिस्सा क्रमांक ROU क्षेत्रफल बीघा बिस्वा
Village
if any Bigha Biswa 1 2
4
3
5
1 2
3
4
5 1. कांटियाँ
345 मिन
2
11
286
0
01
345 Min
2
1. Kantiya
11 2.
286
26
0
0
04
जगरामपुरा
01
26
2. Jagrampura
3.
04
0
बेनीवालों की ढाणी 1053
01
3 . Beniwalon Ki Dhani 1053
0
01 [फा० सं० आर-31015/46/2001- ओ.आर.- II ]
[F. No. R-31015/46/2001 -O.R. -IIJ हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नईदिल्ली, 17 जून , 2003
का.आ. 1704.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 8 फरवरी 2003 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 469 तारीख 3 फरवरी , 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विर्निदष्ट भूमि में गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( जो हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी है ) द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल टर्मिनल से पंजाब राज्य में भटिण्डा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 11 मार्च 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि वह भूमि, जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट है, में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाना चाहिए ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड कीसमनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
तहसील: ओसियॉ
जिला जोधपुर राज्य: राजस्थान क्रम गाँव का नाम खसरा नं. हिस्सा क्रमांक
सं.
ROU क्षेत्रफल बीघा बिस्वा
4
5 1
2
3
0 1
168
07 उम्मेद नगर
2
331
1
18 जुड
0 3
15 केलावा कला 72/1
02 72/2
1
0 4
01 बासनी डॉवरा 1923/1
0 5 नांदिया कल्ला 181/1
08
0 6
249
17 चिन्दड़ी
[फा. सं. आर-31015/45/2001- ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
4389
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
New Delhi , the 17th June , 20003
S.O. 1704.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , number S.O.469 , dated the 3rd February, 2003 issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated 8th February 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transport of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra -Bathinda crudeoil pipeline , by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (asubsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);
Andwhereas , copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 11th March, 2003;
Andwhereas , the competent authority in pursuance of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report to the Central Government ;
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1) of the Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right ofuser in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land, shall , instead ofvesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: Osiyan
State:
District : Jodhpur
Rajashthan
Khasra No.
S. Name of Village No.
Party if Any
ROU -Area Biga Biswa 1
2
3
4 5 1
168
0 07 Umednagar
2
Jud
331
1 18 3 KelawaKalan
72/1
0 15
72/2
I 02 4 Basni Danwara 1923/1
0 01
181/1
0 08 5 NandiyaKalan
6
Chindri
249
0 17
[F. No. R-3 1015/45/2001 -OR- II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.
4390
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल , 2003
का०आ० 1705.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा दिनांक 11 जनवरी , 2000 को भारत के राजपत्र , असाधारण, भाग II , खण्ड 3 ( ii ) में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की दिनांक 04 जनवरी , 2000 की अधिसूचना सं ० का० आ० 32 ( अ ) में निम्नांकित संशोधन करती है :
उक्त अधिसूचना में " इस प्रयोजन हेतु केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा मान्यता प्रदत्त चिकित्सकों के संगठनों के परामर्श से धारा 4 के खण्ड (ज ) के अंतर्गत केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा नियुक्त " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत, क्रमांक 49 के सामने दी गयी प्रविष्टि के लिए निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टि प्रतिस्थापित की जाएगी , अर्थात्: -
डॉ० केतन धीरजलाल देसाई, 4/ए वशिष्ट अपार्टमेन्ट, एल. कालोनी पोलिटैक्निक के सामने , अहमदाबाद-380015 गुजरात
[संख्या यू-16012/1/98 - एस.एस. - 1 ] संयुक्ता राय, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 21st April , 2003
S.O. 1705. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Govern- ment of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O.32 ( E) dated the 4th January, 2000 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part - II , Section 3 ( ii ) dated the 11th January, 2000,
In the said notification under the heading " Appointed by the Central Government under clause (h ) of Section 4 in consultation with the organizations of medical practitio- ners recognised by the Central Government for the pur- pose" , for the entry against S.O. No. 49 , the following entries shall be substituted namely : -
Dr. Ketan Dhirajlal Desai , 4/A Vashista Apartment , Opp . L. Colony Poli Tech, Ahmedabad - 380015, Gujarat.
[No. U- 16012/ 1/ 98 - S.S. - I. ] SANJUKTA RAY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2003
का० आ० 1706. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दामोदर मंगलजी एण्ड कं० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई File No. 1590-11
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-05-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 29011 /25/2000-आई.आर (विविध ) ]
बी० एम० डैविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st May, 2003
S.O. 1706. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govern- ment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 87/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- labour Court , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment ofDamodar Mangalji & Co. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-05-03 .
[No. L -29011 /25/2000-1R( M) } B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 , AT MUMBAI Present Shri S. N. Saundankar PresidingOfficer
REFERENCE No. CGIT - 2/ 87 of 2000 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/ S . DAMODAR MANGALJI & CO . LTD . M/S. DAMODAR MANGALJI MINING CO . PVT. LTD. 1. The Managing Director
M/s. Damodar Mangalji & Co. Ltd, Damodar Niwas , M.G.Road , P.B.No. 32 Panjim , Goa-403001.
2. The Managing Director ,
M/s. Damodar Mangalji Mining Co. Pvt. Ltd. Damodar Niwas, M.G. Road, P.B. No. 32 Panjim, Goa 403001.
AND THEIR WORKMEN
I. The General Secretary GoaMine Workers Union , P.B.No.90 Vasco-da-Gama, Goa-403802.
2. The General Secretary, Damodar Mangalji Mine Workers ' Union Reg. Office Deulem PissuriemMine , Pissurlem Sattari -Goa.
3. The General Secretary, United Mine Workers Union Shetye Sankul , 3rd floor, Tisk Ponda , Goa.
4391 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
APPEARANCES :
:Mr.M.S. Bandodkar Advocate
For the Employers
:Mr. V.A. Pai , Advocate
For UnionNo. 1
The parties to the above reference have settled the subject matter of the dispute by Paying Bonus @ 8.33% and Ex-gratia , totalling to 20 % and signed a settlement on 23-03-2003 . The copy of the said settlement is enclosed.
:Mr. V.A. Pai , Advocate
For Union No.2
:Mr. P. Gaonkar,
For Union No.3
It istherefore respectfully prayed that the reference may disposed off in terms of the said settlement .
Representative
forworkmen
foremployer
Mumbai , dated 9th April , 2003 .
Advt . for employer
Advt . for employer
AWARD
Place: Mumbai
Date 9-4-2003
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L -29011 / 25 / 2000/ IR (M) dated 29-08-2000 , in ex- ercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-sec- tion ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2( A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , have referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication :
Memorandum of settlement signed between the man- agement of M/ s . Damodar Mangalgi and Company Lim- itedGoa and M/s . Damodar Mangali Mining CompanyGoa and their Workers Working at Pissurlem Mine and Navelim PlotRepresented by Damodar Mangali Mine Workers Union Under Section 2 (p) read with section 18 ( 1 ) of Indus- trial Dispute Act, 1947
SHORT RECIATAL OF THE CASE
" Whether the action of the management ofM/s . Damodar Mangalji & Co. Ltd. Goa and M/s . Damodar Mangalji Mining Co. Pvt. Ltd. , Goa in not paying 20% Bonus to their workmen working atPissurlem Mines and Navelim Plot for the year ending 31st March, 1999 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled for ?"
This Memorandum of settlement is signed on 25th day of March 2003 between the management of M/s Damodar Mangalji & Company Limited Goa and M/s . Damodar Mangalji Mining Company Goa (herein atfer referred to as the " Management " and their workers work- ing at Pissurlem Mine and Navelim Plot , represented by Damodar Mangalji Mine Workers Union ( hereinafter re- ferred to as the " UNION" ) .
Whereas the workers employed at Pissurlem Mine and Navelim Plot by the management of M/s . Damodar Mangalji and Company Limited Goa and M/ s . Damodar Mangalji Mining Company Private Limited Goa by their letter dated 04-12-99 demanded 20% bonus for the account- ingyear 1998-99 i.e. for the year ending 31-3-1999 .
Afterreceipt ofthe demand, since there was no ami- cable settlement, the union raised the dispute before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner /Conciliation Officer (Central), Vasco da Gama, Goa .
2. By Claim Statement Exhibit - 10 Goa Mine Workers Union pleaded that the management Company M/ s . Damodar Mangalji Co. Ltd. Goa and Damodar Mangalji Mining Co. Pvt . Ltd. Goa did not pay 20 % bonus to the workers working at Pissurlem Mines and Navelim Plot for the year ending 31-5-1999 which is illegal and unjustified therefore , Companies referred to above be directed to pay 20% Bonus as per the practice prevailing for more than a decade. Record shows Damodar Mangalji Mine Workers Union and United Mine Workers Union were impleaded vide Exhibit -26 & 31 and that the , Union adopted the claim of Mine Workers Union . Management Companies vide Written Statement Exhibit - 23 resisted the claim contending the demands were illegal. When the matter was fixed for evidence , parties concerned vide purshis Exhibit - 34 pointed out that they have settled the dispute amicably and conse- quently reference be disposed of. Hence the order:-
ORDER
Reference stands disposed of as settled vide purshis Ex-34.
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer
During the discussion before the conciliation Of- ficer also there could not be any settlement , therefore the conciliationOfficer submitted a failure report to the Central Government and the Central Government by its order dated 29-8-2000 referred the following dispute before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - 2 , Mumbai for adjudication.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI
Ref. No. CG IT - 2/87 , of 2000
EMPLOYER in relation to the management of M/s Damodar Mangalji & Company Ltd and M/sDamodar Mangalji Mining Company
AND
Their Workmen
"Whether the action of the management ofM/s . Damodar Mangalji & company Limited Goa and M/s . Damodar Mangalji Minig Company Private Limited Goa in not paying 20 % bonus to their workmen working at Pissurlem Mines and Navelim Plot for the year ending 31st March , 1999 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled for ?"
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR
1590 G1 /03-16 4392
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
The said reference is known as Ref. No. CGIT - 2/87/ 2000.
Subsequent to the reference before the Industrial Tribunal the workmen employed at Pissurlem mine and Navelim Plot change the allegiance from CI TU to Damodar Mangalji Mine Workers Union.
Subsequentto the changing the allegiance with Damodar Mangalji Mine Workers Union , the management started discussion with the said union for amicable settle- ment of the dispute .
During the discussion it was informed by the man- agement to the union that , it has already paid an advance to all the workers pending the demand of bonus by the workers for the year 1998-99 .
It was however submitted by the workers /union that the company only paid an advances and not as bonus , and workers are agreeable for the said advance to be adjusted against their entitlement of the bonus for the year 1998-99 .
Arising out of the suggestion of the union further discussion / negotiations continued between the parties and the following settlement arrived at between the parties with the intent that it shall be binding upon them under Section 2( p) read with Section 18 ( 1 ) of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947.
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
1. It is agreed by the workers/ union that the manage- ment shall entitled to adjust whatever advances paid to the workers in the ycar 1999 for the entitlement of bonus to the workers for the accounting year 1998-99 .
2. It is agreed by the workers/ union that the manage- ament is entitled to adjust the amount paid to the workers as advances towards the bonus for the year 1998-99 i.e. for the ycar ending 31st March, 1999. All eligible workmen not paid advance shall be paid @ 20% ( Bonus & Ex - gratia ) as per above understanding.
3. It is therefore further agreed by the workers that whatever advances paid by the management arising out of the demand ofbonus shall be adjusted without precedent against the bonus as per Bonus Act and/ or ex - gratia for the year 1998-99 amount not exceeding @ 20 % in actual basic earnings of the workmen and their entire demand including the demand covered under the reference stand fully satisfied and they will have no further claim ofwhat- soever nature against the management as and by way of bonus and/ or ex - gratia for the year 1998-99.
4. It is agreed between the parties that a joint applica- tion shall be made before CGIT -2 in reference No. CGIT-2/87/ 2000 for disposal of reference in terms of advance settlement .
5. It is hereby agreed between the parties that the excess amount paid over an above 20 % ( i.e. 8.33% Bonus & ex -gratia ) shall be recovered from the respective work- men,
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] SIGNATURE OF THE PARTIES
FOR MANAGEMENT FOR WORKERS /UNION 1. Mr. Manoj D. Rajani Director.
1. Shri Milind Parab President, DamodarMangalji Mine Workers Union.
2. Shri Naval Singh Officer-Personnel- Admn.
2. Shri Praksh Naik General Secretary, Damodar Mangalji Mine Workers Union
3. Shri Balchandra Gawde Treasurer, DamodarMangalji Mine Workers Union .
नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2003
का० आ० 1707.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार शलुम - बर्गर आईसा सर्विसेज लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, मुंबई नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-05-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 31011/ 10/2002- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ] बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st May, 2003
S.O. 1707. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govern- ment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 84/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on 19-05-03 .
[No. L -31011/ 10/2002-IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 , AT MUMBAI
Present Shri S. N. SAUNDANKAR
PresidingOfficer
REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 2/84 of 2002 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD .
The Assistant Personnel Manager Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. New StandardEngg . Estate, Western Express Highway Mumbai -400063 .
4393
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
AND THEIR WORKMEN
The General Secretary
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Darabshaw B. Cursetji's and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-05-03.
[No. L- 31012/ 2/2002- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.
Bhartiya Kamgar Sena , Shivsena Bhavan Gadkari Chowk, Dadar Mumbai 400 028
ANNEXURE
APPEARANCES :
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL FOR THE EMPLOYER :Mr. Ashish Patro Representa-
tive
TRIBUNAL NO. 2, AT MUMBAI
Present
FOR THE WORKMEN :No appearance .
Shri S. N. SAUNDANKAR Mumbai , dated 28th April, 2003
AWARD
PresidingOfficer
REFERENCE No. CGIT - 2/ 75 of 2002
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OFM/ S . DARABSHAW B. CURSETJI'S SONS BOMBAY PVT. LTD .
TheManaging Director
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L - 31011/ 10/2002/IR (M) dated 1st November, 2002, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
M/sDBC & Sons (B) Pvt . Ltd.
Darabshaw House , Ballard Estate, Mumbai 400038 .
AND
Their Workman
Mr. Abdul Kadar
" Whether the action of the management ofM/s . Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. , Mumbai is legal and justified in demanding an unconditional undertaking from the members of Bhartiya Kamgar Sena before reporting on duty with effect from 21.1.2002 ? If not , what relief the workmen con- cerned are entitled to ?"
Room No. 3 , Bharati Nagar
Tilak Nagar , Chembur
Mumbai 400089 .
APPEARANCES :
: Mr. B. K. Ashok , Advocate
Forthe Employer
:
For the Workmen
Inperson
Mumbai , dated 10th April , 2003
AWARD
2. Record shows that on 19-2-2003 Union though served vide acknowledgement Ex -4 , none appeared on their behalf, though Representative of management Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. , was present. After giv- ing long date for filing Claim Statement also today none appeared on behalf of Union nor filed Claim Statement which indicates union is not interested in prosecuting the case and hence the order:---
ORDER
Reference stands disposed of for non -prosecution .
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 21 मई, 2003
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L - 31012/2 /2002 - IR (M) , dated 11-10-2002, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub- section ( I ) and sub - section 2 (A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Darabshaw B. Cursetji's Sons (Bombay ) Pvt. Ltd. , Mumbai in terminating the services of Shri Abdul Kadar, Carpenter w.e.f. 3-9-99 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, what relief the workmen is entitled to ? " का० आ० 1708. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दारबशॉ बी करसेट जी संस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक, विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , मुंबई नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-05-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. - 31012/2/2002-आई.आर ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 21st May , 2003
2. Vide Purshis Ex-6 Workman Shri Abdul Kadar con- tended that the point in issue under this reference is the Schedule order in Ref. CGIT -2-9-02 received to this Tribu- nal which matter is now fixed for framing of issues and inspite that the Government by Orderdt . 11-10-2002 by mistake again referred the same point in issue as dispute to this. Tribunal for adjudication, therefore , this reference be treated as non -est . Counsel for the management Company has no objection to this , consequently this reference will have to be filed and hence the order :
S.O. 1708. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 75/2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the 4394
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
ORDER
Reference stanas filed as the point in issue has already been shown as Schedule in earlier Ref. CGIT - 2/ 9 of 2002.
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2003
का० आ० 1709.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार उड़ीसा माईनिंग कार्पो. लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.-29012/48/2000-आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st May, 2003
S.O. 1709. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 78/2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- labour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Orissa Mining Corpn . Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-05-2003 .
[No. L -29012/48/ 2000 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL- TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR PRESENT:
Shri S. K. Dhal , OSJS ( Sr. Branch ) .
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T. -Cum - Labour-Court, Bhubaneswar
Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No. 78/2001 Date of Conclusion of the hearing-16th April , 2003 Date of passing Award-2nd May, 2003 BETWEEN :
The Management of the General Manager ,
OrissaMining Corporation Ltd. ,
P.O. Barbil , Keonjhar-769 035.
1stParty-Management .
AND
Their Workman , Shri Baidu Mahakud,
Ex-Blasting Helper, At/Po. Guruda,
Via. Joda , Keonjhar . 2nd Party-Workman.
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] APPEARANCES:
M/ s. Saday Laxmi Patnaik, Advocate Forthelst Party- Management.
Forthe 2nd M/s. N.C. Mohanty,
Advocate.
Party-Union
AWARD
The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour , in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (d ) of Sub -sec- tion ( 1 ) andSub -section 2(a) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L -29012/48/ 2000/ IR(M) , dated 06-07-2000:
"Whether the action ofthe Management of S.G.B.K. Manganese Mines of Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. insuperannuating Shri Baidu Mahakud, Ex-Blast- ingHelper from 30-6-1999 without considering the school leaving certificate and the examination of Chief District MedicalOfficer, Keonjhar isjustified? If not, towhat relief the workman is entitled?"
2. The case of the 2nd Party as per his Claim State- ment runs thus :-
He originally joined in the year 1967 as a Blasting Helper, under M/s . Sirajuddin & Co. At the time of his joining in the mines , his name along with all particulars in respect of his bio -data was entered in the registers of the company duly authenticatedby him. The said entries were made supportedby authenticated documents i.e. school leaving certificate wherein his date of birth was reflected. In the year 1982, by the order of the Government ofOrissa, the said mine was taken over by the present Management . So, he was transferred from the rolls of M/s . Sirajuddin & Co. to the roll of the present Management . After the mine was taken over by the Management, a new form -B register was prepared and he was asked to put his signature and he accordingly did it without knowing the contents of the same. The contents of the register was not read over and explained to him. He was given the impression that a new Form-B Register has been prepared after obtaining all the informations/ materials from the old Registers , which was being maintained by M/s . Sirajuddin & Co. So , he had signed in a good faith. He also had shown the original school leaving certificate to the official at the time ofentries in the Form-B register as the proof of his correct date of birth. He had no knowledge that when he came to the roll ofthe present Management he was shown as 43 years in the year 1982 when the present management took charge from the previous owner. On 23-1-1999 he was served with anoffice order that he was going to be retired on 30-6-1999 after attaining the age of superannuation. He made a representation on 24-2-1999 along with the xerox copy of the school leaving certificate . He had requested the 1st Party -Management to withdraw the office order on the ground that his date of birth as mentioned in the school leaving certificate was on 9-3-1946 . Therefore he should be retired on 30-3-2006 but not on 30-6-99 and his representation was not considered and he did not receive any reply from the 1st Party- Management . As per his 4395 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4. On the above pleadings of the parties , the follow- ing Issues have been settled.
ISSUES
1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?
2. Whether the action of the Management in superannuating Shri Baidu Mahakud from 30-6-1999 without considering the school leaving certificate and the examination ofthe Chief District Medical Officer, Keonjhar isjustified ?
3. If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?
5. The 2nd Party has examined himself as one of the witness and has exhibited five documents in support ofhis case. On the other hand, the 1st Party-Management has examined two witnesses and has exhibited two documents insupport of their stand .
FINDINGS
request he was examined by a board as per the instruction ofthe C.D.M.O. , Keonjhar for determination of his age and cerfificate was accordingly issued stating that the age of the 2nd party would be 53 years as on 19-2-1999 . After obtaining the said certificate he has produced the same before the Ist Party- Management for consideration of his representation and to correct his date of birth. He also submitted his school leaving certificate but no step was taken by the 1st Party - Management to consider his representation and his date ofbirth was not corrected . So, he raised a dispute on 19-7-1999 the conciliation proceeding failed, the report was submitted to the Government of India, thereafter the present reference has been made. The 2nd Party has prayed to pass an award in his favour by directing the 1st Party-Management to reinstate him in service with all service benefits after making correction in respect of his age in the service register and he may be allowed to continue into service till he attains the age of superannuation i.e. 30-3-2006 .
ISSUE NO . I
6. Admittedly, the 1st Party- Management comes under the definition of the Industry and the 2nd Party is a workman. He has challenged about his superannuation on the ground that the order has been passed for his premature retirement, which is illegal . So , he has raised a dispute and after failure of conciliation the Government of India has made a reference to the Tribunal . This is being an Industrial Dispute , the reference is maintainable and this Tribunal has got jurisdiction to answer the reference . Hence , this Issue is answered accordingly.
ISSUE NO. II
7. Placing reliance in the case of Shreenath Lineman - Versus- Executive Engineer , U.P. S.E.B. , reported in 1991 FLR 54 All H.C. , in the case of Dr. (Miss ) Binapani Devi - Versus- State of Orissa, reported in SCLJ 447 ( 452 ) SC , in the case of M.D. O.T.M. and others -Versus M. Nayak, reported in 1996 LLR 215 SC and in the case of Nityananda Gupta -Versus- SAIL reported in 1994 ( 68 ) FLR 828 Cal . H.C. It has been argued on behalf ofthe 2nd Party that the principle of natural justice has been violated when the order of retirement is passed based on the date of birth which is challenged by the 2nd Party, without considering the representation of the 2nd Party for its correction . Accordingto the 2nd Party when order of retirement was issued to him he made a representation intimating that his date of birth recorded in the service record is not correct and the 1st Party - Management without considering the said representation passed order for retrenchment , which is , illegal. So , according to the 2nd Party the date of birth recorded in his school leaving certificate is to be accepted and he may be reinstated because he has got a long period ofservice. On the other hand, the Ist Party- management has invited the attention of this Tribunal in the case of G.M. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. , West Bengal,-Versus- Shib KumarDushad & Others reported in 2000 (7 ) SC 380 and in thecase ofUnion of India , -Versus - Harnam Singh reported in AIR 1993 SC 1367, it is submitted that, the date ofbirth recorded in the service record if not challenged earlier the same can not be corrected at the fag end of the retirement .
3. The 1st Party -Management has filed their Written Statement. They have pleaded that , in the year 1982, 1000 workers including the supervisory staff of M/ s . Sirajuddin &Co.were transferred to the roll of the present Management and as per order of the Government of Orissa they took over the charge from M/ s . Sirajuddin & Co. It is admitted by the IstParty-Management that, as per Mines Act, it is statutory obligation on the part ofManagement to record all the details of the workman like age , permanent address , designation and father or husband's name including vocational training of the workman with passport size photograph . In that register , the Manager of the Mines and the workman are required to sign in each page i.e. called 'B ' Register and the said register is subject to verification by different statutory authorities like GGM, Labour Enforcement Department of the Government of India from time to time . When the 1st Party -Management took charge of the mines they wanted the original ' B' register from the old employer who refused to hand over the same on the ground that decision of the Government has been challenged by him but suggested the present Management to copy out the information from the 'B ' Register mainained by him . While it was copied the signature of the other workman including the present 2nd Party was also taken on that register in token of authentication . The 2nd party had admitted that , he had workedwith M/s . Sirajuddin & Co. from the year 1967. It has beendenied that, the 2nd Party had signed the B-Register in good faith without knowing the contents of it. After the retirement notice was issued on 23-1-1999 , submission of representation by the 2nd Party has been admitted by 1st Party-Management. It has been pleaded that the same has been rejected, as there was no merit in his case . As regards submissions of school leaving certificate or medical certificate ithas been pleaded that , when the 1st Party -Management has not asked the 2nd Party to bring those certificates the 2nd party has produced the certificate and if those certificates are examined carefully much doubt will arise as regards his date of birth recorded in his school leaving certificate . The 1st Party-Management has taken the stand thatthis is not a premature retirement and at the fag end of his service career the date of birth of a person cannot be corrected. So, they have prayed to pass award in their favour.
4396
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 8. The copy of the Form -B Register has been marked in made a representation enclosing the certificate issued by the C.D.M.O. Keonjhar in the year 1995 making claim that the age recorded in the Form-B is not correct . The 2nd Party has failed to avail the first opportunity for making representation for correction of his date of birth . No materials have been placed before this Tribunal that the 1st Party -Management with an ulterior motive has wrongly recorded his age when the Form - B Register was prepared . Ordinarily the date ofbirth recorded in the school admission register is accepted as correct date ofbirth . The Ext. -1 is not the original certificate because there are some over writings inrespect of serial number of the certificate. Correction has beenmade after 38 years of date of issue and no explanation has been offered by the 2nd Party under what circumstances the correction was made . So, the genuinness ofthe Ext - 1 appears to be doubtful . Even if it is accepted for the argument sake that, the date of birth as recorded in the school leaving certificate is correct the 2nd Party should have made representation in the year 1995 when an order was issued that his age has been recorded as 43 years as on1982 but he did not do that, but four months prior to his retirement he made a representation . So , I am inclined to accept the submission made on behalf of the 1st Party- Management that no direction can be given for correction of his date of birth if it is represented at the fag end of retirement . The 2nd Party has admitted in his cross examination that before three months of retirement he applied for correction of his date of birth . So , in that case, it can not be said that the 1st Party- Management has committed illegality by not considering the representation ofthe disputants for correction of his date of birth . The order of superannuation passed by the 1st Party- Management in favour of the 2nd party, in my opinion , in the above circumstances , is justified. Hence , this issue is answered accordingly.
Issue No. III
9. In view of my findings given in respect of Issue No. II the 2nd Party -Workman is not entitled for any relief. 10. Reference is answered accordingly. Dictated & Corrected by me .
S.K. DHAL, Presiding Officer BEFORE THE C.G.I.T. -CUM-LABOUR COURT: BHUBANESWAR Tr. LD . Case No. 78/2001 List of the Witnesses Examined on behalf of the 2nd Party-Workman
W.W. No. I Shri Baidu Mahakud (2nd party -himself) List of the Witnesses Examined on behalf of the 1st Party- Management.
M.W. No. 1. Shri Prafulla Kumar Behera.
M.W. No. 2. Shri Subash Chandra Panda .
List ofDocuments exhibeted on behalf of the 2nd Party- workmen
Ext -1 . Original School Leaving Cetificate, dated 1-10-1960.
Ext -2. Representation to the Manager (Admn . ) O.М.С. Limited dated 24-2-99 .
this case as Ext. -B on behalf of the 1st Party- Management. The 4th column of the said register indicates the age and sex. Their it has been written that the age of the disputant is 43 years as on 18-6-1982, when the present Management took the charge of the mines from the previous Management and the signature of the disputant also is found their. The date ofbirth has not been mentioned in the Form -B Register. In the year 1995 an office order has been issued intimating the disputant that he was aged about 43 years as on 18-6-1982 and that would be consider for all purposes . The copy of the said office order was sent to the disputant . But admittedly, he has not made any representation in the year 1995 intimating the 1st Party -Management that , the age recorded in the Form-B register is 43 years as on 18-6-1982 is not correct. But he made a representation when the order of retirement was issued to him in the year 1999 i.e. on 24-2-1999, which is four months prior to his retirement . The 2nd Party has also relied on Ext. -1 and Ext . -3 . Ext. - 1 is the original certificate issued in favour of the 2nd Party from the school where he last studied and Ext . -3 is the certificate given by the Chief Dist . Medical Officer , Keonjhar. Accordingto the 2nd Party his date of birth is 9th March 1946 as recorded in the school register and this tallies with the certificate given by the C.D.M.O. , Keonjhar that he was about 53 years as on 19-2-1999 . The 2nd Party has taken the stand that he had shown the school leaving certificate when he has entered into service . After hearing of both the parties and after perusing the evidence adduced, I find that the submission made by the 2nd Party that he has shown his school leaving certificate at the time of his first engagement can not be accepted. Ext . - 1 is dated 1-10-1960 . The column 5 is meant to mention the date ofbirth in words and infigures . It is seen that , in words the date ofbirth was mentioned as Nineth March Sixty Four, though in the blank column the date of birth is recorded 9-3-46 . Subsequently, the word sixty four has been corrected on 2-2-1995 . If the date ofbirth of the disputant is accepted as 9-3-1946 for the argument sake, he joined in the service in the year 1968 because in his evidence he has admitted that by the time he first joins he was about 22 years . By the year 1968 this certificate does not appear to have been corrected and his date of birth was recorded in words column as 1964. The 2nd Party has failed to explain under what circumstances thishas been corrected. He has not taken step to call for the original admission register of the concerned school to prove his date of birth as 9th March , 1946. It is true that, his date ofbirth should or can not be 1964 because the date of issue of this certificate is in the year 1960. The 1st Party- Management has issued a letter in the year 1995 intimating that he would retire in the year 1999 as his age has been recorded as 43 years as on 1982. The correction , which has been made in the Ext . - 1 , has been done prior to this intimation . So, it is not the case that when he got the intimation he noticed the defects and got it corrected. Even if it is accepted for the argument sake that the certificate wascorrected in the year 1995 it is not known as to why he remained silent for four years without making any representation to the 1st Party - Management that the age recorded in the Form -B Register is not correct and it should be corrected in view of the school leaving certificate which was in his possession. But that has not been done. In the year 1999 , just prior to four months of his retirement, he
Ext -3 . Certificate dated 19-2-1999 issued by the C.D.M.O. Keonjhar.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Ext-4. Copy of the letter regarding taking over and hand- ing over the charge of mines letter dated 7-6-1982 .
Ext-5. Copy of O.M.C. Rule .
List of the Documents exhibited on behalf of the 1st Party- Management
Ext.-A. Notice indicating the date ofbirth of Shri Baidu Mahakud.
Ext.-B. B. Register in which the date of birth of Shri Baidu Mahakud , alongwith his name finds place.
Ext. -B/ 1 . Entry of name of the 2nd party at Sl . No. 208 of B.Register .
Ext. -B/2. Signature of the 2nd Party. नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2003
का. आ. 1710.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . फोर्बस गोकक लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , मुंबई न. 2, के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 72/2001 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-39012/5/2001- आई. आर. ( विविध) ] बी.एम. डैविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st May, 2003
S.O. 1710. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 72/2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum -Labour Court, Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/s . Forbes Gokak Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-05-2003
[No. L- 39012/5 /2001 - IR (M)] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . II , MUMBAI
PRESENT:
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO , CGIT- 2/ 72 of 2001.
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
M/ s . FORBES GOKAK LTD. ,
M/s. ForbesGokak Ltd. ,
TheVice-President (HR) , Patvolk Division , 19 , J.N. Heredia Marg, Ballard Estate , Mumbai MUMBAI -400001
AND
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4397 THEIR WORKMEN
Mr. S. Ramanathan 13 , Yamuna, 3rd Floor, Mulund Sandesh Co -op.Hsg . Society, Nahur Road , Mulund (West) Mumbai .
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER:
Mr. L.L. D'Souza Representative .
FOR THE WORKMEN:
Mr. B.K. Ashok Advocate .
Mumbai , Dated 1st April, 2003
AWARD
TheGovernment of India Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L -39012/5/2001 /IR (M) dtd. 14-05-2001 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management in terminating the services of Sh. S. Ramanathan w.e.f. 25-5-2000 without following principle of natural justice is legal and justified ? If not , what relief the workman Sh . S. Ramanathan is entitled to ? " 2. Workman Ramanathan was employed with the management company at Mumbai as Confidential Secretary. According to him management company terminated him illegally w.e.f. 25-5-2000 and therefore company be directed to reinstate him in service with full back wages . Management company resisted the claim of workman by filing Written Statement (Exhibit - 10) contending that for valid reasons the action was taken against the workman and therefore he is not entitled to the wages . On the basis the of the pleadings issues were framed at Exhibit - 12 and when the matter was fixed for evidence both the parties vide purshis (Exhibit - 18) pointed out that they have settled the dispute amicably and hence the order :-
ORDER
Reference, stands disposed of as settled vide purshis (Exhibit- 18) .
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT AT CGIT Ref. CGIT No. 2/72/01
S. Ramanathana
V/s.
Forbes Gokak Ltd.
May It please the Hon'ble Adalat Both the parties abovenamed state as under :
The parties abovenamed settle this dispute for a sum of Rs. 80000/- ( Eighty thousand only) in full & final settlement including claim towards reinstatement , backwages , leave wages , bonus , LIA , etc.
[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
The workman confirms that he has no further claims ofwhatsoever nature , monetary or otherwise , against the company inview of the aforesaid settlement .
Mumbai
17-3-2003
Uday Bagade
Sd/-
Sr. Manager (HR )
PanelMembers
Illegible
V.P. Patil
In person
Sd/-
P.N. Subramaniam
Illegible
नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2003
श्रमिक को नोटिस जरिये रजि. एडी जारी किये गये । जिस पर यह रिपोर्ट आई कि प्रार्थी का पता सही अंकित नहीं है । इस पर इस न्यायालय के द्वारा दि. 6-8-2001 को व 19-1-2002 को श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार को प्रार्थी का पूर्ण पता भिजवाने के लिये लिखा गया लेकिन आज दिनांक तक प्रार्थी का पता उन्होंने नहीं भिजवाया है जबकि केन्द्र सरकार श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली ने एक पत्र दिनांकित 27-3-2002 को क्षेत्रीय श्रम आयुक्त ( केन्द्रीय ) अजमेर को लिखा और उसकी एक प्रति इस न्यायालय को पृष्ठांकित की कि श्रम न्यायालय अजमेर को उपरोक्त प्रकरण में प्रार्थी का पूर्ण पता भिजवाई जावे लेकिन उसके बाद भी आज दिनांक तक क्षेत्रीय श्रम आयुक्त ( केन्द्रीय ) अजमेर के द्वारा इस कार्यालय/न्यायालय को उसका कोई जवाब नहीं दिया गया । इस बीच इस श्रम न्यायालय ने क्षेत्रीय श्रम आयुक्त ( केन्द्रीय ) अजमेर को भी पत्र लिखकर प्रार्थी के सही पते की मांग की गई थी लेकिन उसका भी कोई जवाब प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है इस रेफरेंस को प्राप्त हुए करीब दो वर्ष का समय हो चुका है । अतः ऐसी स्थिति में प्रकरण की परिस्थितियों में ' कोई विवाद नहीं' अवार्ड पारित किया जाता है ।
का० आ० 1711.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार राज० स्टेट मिनरल्स डेवलपमेंट कार्यों० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय अजमेर के पंचाटको प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 29025/ 1 /2000- आई.आर. ( एम ) ]
अवार्ड आज दिनांक 16-4-2003 को खुले न्यायालय में लिखवाया जाकर सुनाया गया ।
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव
अतुल कुमार जैन, न्यायाधीश New Delhi , the 21st May, 2003
नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2003
S.O. 1711. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal Ajmer as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ' Rajasthan State Mineral Development Corpn . and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-05-2003.
का० आ० 1712.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै ० चोऊगुले एंड कं० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुम्बई नं . 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकर को 19-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[No. L- 29025/ 1/2000 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
[सं. एल.- 29012/56/2000- आई.आर ( विविध ) ] अनुबन्ध
बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव न्यायालय श्रम न्यायालय एंव औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण, अजमेर
New Delhi , the 21st May, 2003 सीआई टी आर नं ०7/2001
रेफरेंस नम्बर एल-29025/1/2000- आई आर
(मिसलेनियस ) दि० 30-6-2000
श्री छगनाराम निवासी धरोही तहसील, शिव तहसील,
जिला अजमेर
प्राथी- श्रमिक
बनाम
S.O. 1712.-In pursuancersuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 91/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Chowgule & Co. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-05-2003.
मुख्य प्रबंध निदेशक, राजस्थान स्टेट मिनरल्स डेवलेपमेंट कारपोरेशन, कानजी भवन, सी स्कीम, तिलक मार्ग , जयपुर
नियोजक- अप्राथी
[No. L- 29012/56/2000 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
समक्ष श्री अतुल कुमार जैन , आर एच जे एस
प्रार्थी की ओर से कोई उपस्थित नहीं ।
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 11 , MUMBAI अवार्ड
PRESENT :
दिनांक 16-4-2003
S. N. SAUNDANKAR
यह रेफरेंस इस न्यायालय को वास्ते न्यायनिर्णयन दिनांक 7-09-2000 को प्राप्त हुआ था जिस पर इस न्यायालय के द्वारा प्रार्थी
Presiding Officer भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
REFERENCE NO.CGIT - 2/91 of 2000 .
Employers in Relation to the Management of M/s. Chowgule & Company Ltd. ,
M/s . Chowgule & Company Ltd. ,
The Managing Director,
Chowgule House , Mormugao Harbour,
Goa-403803
and their Workmen
Chowgule Employees Union ,
The General Secretary,
P.O. Box.90,
Vasco-da-gama
Goa
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER :Mr. R.N. Shah , Advocate. FOR THE WORKMEN :Mr. V.A. Pai , Advocate .
Mumbai , dated the 20th February, 2003 AWARD-PART- 1
The Government of India Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 29012 /56/ 2000/IR (M) dtd. 20-9-2000 in exer- cise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1 ) and Sub - section (2) (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication .
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Chowgule & Co. Ltd, Goa in dismissing Shri Joseph Antony, Operator working at their Pale Mines w.e.f. 14-8-1997 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
2.Workman Shri Joseph Antony was in the employment of the company as operator. It is contended workman participated in the strike in the year 1995 and therefore company started harassing him and in that process he was asked to operate the machine Wheel Loader which he declined since he was not required to do any other job other than Hitachi / Poclain, and that the Wheel Loader is required to be operated bytrained workers and that he was not given training to that effect and that consequently he was chargesheeted on 11-6-96 alleging he refused to operate the Wheel Loader machine on 31-3-96, 2-5-96, 10-5-96 amounting to misconduct. It is averred thatto victimise the workman company appointed Advocate Shri Gaikwad an outsider to hold inquiry against him and that the said inquiry officer to find him guilty recorded the findings proved and based on that he was dismissed by theDisciplinary Authority w.e.f. 14-8-97. It is pleaded that as perclause-21 ofthe Standing orders inquiry is to be conducted bythe officer ofthe company however inquiry was conducted not by an officer but by an outsider contrary to the rules and therefore the inquiry vitiates . It is pleaded that the findings not based on the evidence and therefore perverse.
1590 G1 /03-17
4399 3. Management Company resisted the claim of workmanby filing Written Statement (Exhibit - 12) contenting that the inquiry was fair and proper and the findings are perverse. It is pleaded that considering the serious and grave misconduct on the part of the workman on disregard and disobedience of orders was chargeheeted wide letter dtd . 11-6-96 and that the inquiry officer found him guilty by his report and based on the report , since workman committed misconduct he was dismissed from 14-8-97 . It is contended inquiry does not vitiate and therefore the claim ofthe workman be dismissed with costs .
4. On the basis of pleadings preliminary issues were framed at Exhibit - 16 and in that context Workman Joseph Antony filed affidavit in lieu of Examination in Chief (Exhibit - 22) and closed oral evidence vide purshis (Ex- 23) In rebutal , inquiry officer Mr. Gaikwad filed affidavit (Exhibit - 24) and the management relying on the oral evidence of Sinha recorded (in CGIT- 2/45/ 99 Exhibit- 27) closed oral evidence vide purshis (Exhibit-25/26).
5. Workman filed written submissions (Exhibit - 27) and the management (Exhibit - 28 ). On perusing the record as a whole and hearing the Learned Counsel for both sides , I record my findings on the following issues for the rea- sons mentioned below :-
Issues
Findings
Yes
1: Whether the domestic inquiry
wasconducted against the workman as per the Principles of Natural Justice ? '
No
2. Whether the findings of the inquiry officer are perverse ?
REASONS
6. At the threshold the Learned Counsel Shri Pai for the workman urged that the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was admittedly conducted by Advocate Shri Gaikwad an outsider and it is in contravention to the provisions of the Model Standing Orders applicable to the company and its employees , therefore the inquiry vitiates . On the other hand , the Learned Counsel for the management company Mr. Shah submitted that the Certified Standing Orders do not specifically require that the inquiry officer should only be an employee of the company as the object of conducting the domestic inquiry is to enable the inquiry officer to give its findings on the charges levelled against the workman and that the right of the employer to conduct the inquiry is not restricted by the Standing Orders only to the Industrial Establishment.
7. Workman Antony in his cross examination para 15 admitted that inquiry was conducted in accordance with the standing orders and that the standing orders do not mention that outsider cannot be the inquiry officer. He further admitted that he did not object in the appointment ofAdvocate Mr. Gaikwad as inquiry officer. Admittedly one Mr. M.C, Pereira was Defence Representative of the workman of his choice . When admittedly workman who wasrepresented by Defence Representative did not object 4400
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
Advocate Mr. Gaikwad an outsider, as inquiry officer and when the standing orders do not prohibit in appointing an outsider as inquiry officer, submission as above ofMr. Pai finds no force. His Lordships of Rajasthan High Court in Capstan Meters (I ) Ltd. Vs. Judge , L. C. Jaipur & Ors . 1991 II LLJ p. 290 and the Andhra Pradesh High Court in G. Chandrakanth Vs. Guntur Distt . Milk Producers Union Ltd. rep.by its General Manager , Sangan Dairy 1994 II CLR 270 no doubt, ruled that " employer appointing outsider (advo- cate) as enquiry officer , he being incompetent and unauthorised person invalidates domestic inquiry. Their Lordships of Supreme Court in Saran Motors (Pvt . ) Ltd. , New Delhi Vs. Vishwanath ( Supra) in DD Cement Ltd. Vs. Murarilal ( 197C - 1 -LLJ -416) in Shiv Sakthi Bus Service Vs. P. Gopal(AIR) 1971 Mad. 434 ruled:
"Domestic inquiry conducted by Advocates to be not illegal " His Lordships of Bombay High Court in Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. Maruti Mahipati Jagadale & Anr. 2002 II CLR 1018 ruled "considering that the object of conducting a domestic inquiry is to enable the inquiry officer to give his findings unbiased i.e. without favouring to any of the parties , cannot said to be incontravention to the standing orders . " In Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. Devishanker Kumar Shukla 2000 - I -LL3 53J . Their Lordships of Supreme Court observed that requirement to appoint an inquiry officer an outsider is to eliminate the likelihood of any bias and such a provision can be construed to mean that a person who is not even an employee being an outsider having no interest in the outcome of the domestic inquiry is to be excluded. Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court and the Bombay High Court the submission of Mr. Pai that inquiry vitiates as it wasconducted by an Advocate , an outsider finds no substance .
8. So far the domestic inquiry is concerned , Their Lordships ofApex Court in Sur Enamel and Stamping Works Vs. TheirWorkmen 1963 II LLJ SC p. 367 ruled that enquiry cannot be said to have been properly held unless:
(1) the employce proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges levelled against him;
(2) the witnesses are examined -ordinarily in the pres- ence of the employee in respect of the charges ;
(3 ) the employee is given a fair opportunity to cross - examine witnesses ;
(4) he is given a fair opportunity to examine wit- nesses including himself in his defence ifhe so wishes on any relevant matter, and
(5) the inquiry officer records his findings with rea- sons for the same in his report .
WorkmanAntony in his cross - examination clearly admitted that he had participated fully in the inquiry in connection with the chargesheet dtd . 11-6-96 and that the inquiry proceedings ( Exhibit- 17 ) , bear his signatures. Workman admittedly had received copy of inquiry report
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] and that according to him on the basis of the documents/ evidence findings were recorded. He nowhere whispered that he had not understood the charges and that he was not given opportunity. Therefore if looked the evidence and the inquiry proceedings in view of the tests laid down in the decision supra, the inquiry can safely said to be fair and proper. Since according to workman findings are based on record and evidence cannot said to be biased therefore looking to the matter from any point of view it is clear tha. the inquiry was conducted as per the Principles ofNatural Justice and the findings not perverse . Issues are therefore answered accordingly and hence the order :-
ORDER
The domestic inquiry conducted against the work- manwas as per the principles of Natural Justice .
The findings of the inquiry officer are not perverse . S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2003
का०आ० 1713.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टाटा आयरन एण्ड स्टील कं. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 29012/111/2000- आई.आर (विविध ) ]
बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003
S.O. 1713.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 81/2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. TISCO and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 22-05-03 .
[No. L-29012/ 111 /2000- IR(M)]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR Present:
Shri S.K. Dhal, OSJS ( Sr. Branch) ,
Presiding Officer , C.G.I.T. -cum-Labour Court , Bhubaneswar.
Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 81/2001 Date ofConclusion of the hearing- 17th April , 2003 Date ofPassing Award- 13th May, 2003 BETWEEN:
TheManagement of the General Manager ( OMQ) , T.I.S. Co. Ltd. P.O. Noamundi , Singhbhum - 833217 1stParty- Management.
4401 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
AND
Theirworkman , Shri Bhubaneswar
Thakur, Qr . No. FR- 2/3 , New Camp , TISCO Ltd. , At/P.O . Joda ,
Distt. Keonjhar , Orissa -758001 .
2ndParty- Workman.
APPEARANCES:
Shri M.Z.M Ansari
Forthe 1st Party Management .
Shri Bhubaneswar Thakur
ForHimself 2nd Party-Workman.
AWARD
TheGovernment of India in the Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 29012 /111/ 2000/IR (M) , dated 17-10-2000:
again on 17-9-1998 he was declared as unfit for a period of sixmonths by the Company Mieaical Board on Psychiatric ground. It alleged that the board had no specialists in Psychiatric branch . He has further alleged that on 17-9-1998 he did not appear before the Medical Board and appeared before Dr. A. Gupta who declared him fit for his left hand fracture , but he was declared as unfit by the MedicalBoard for a period of six months on depression ground . After the said period of six months the disputant appeared before the special Medical Board at Tata Main Hospital who further declared him unfit for a period of six months . It is alleged that during that period no medicine was prescribed. His case was not referred to for higher treatment and at last on 2-9-1999 the Medical Board declared him unfit and suggested that he should take retirement on medical ground . It is further pleaded that , on the date of admission in TISCO Hospital, Joda i.e. on 30-7-1998 he was allowed Injury On Work and till now he has not been declared fit by the company Doctors . So, the Injury On Work once allowed can not be discontinued till he is declared fit . According to him the salary for the period should have been given to him , but without paying the salary he has been compelled to take retirement by Medical Separation Scheme, which is illegal and arbitrary . He has prayed to pass award directing the 1st Party - Management topay the salary from 30-7-1998 till the date and to reinstate him in his duty with all back wages .
"Whether the demand of Shri Bhubaneswar Thakur , Ex-Driver-cum-Havildar for payment of salary /wages for the period i.e. Injury on work from 4-8-1998 to till the date ofhis retirement from the Management of Joda IronMines of TISCO Ltd. , Joda, is justified? If so , what relief the workman is entitled to ?"
2. The case ofthe 2nd Party as per his Claim Statement may be stated in brief.
3. The 1st Party -Management has filed their Written Statement . They have pleaded that the disputant who was Ex-Driver- cum -Havildar was assaulted by some miscreant on 30-7-1998 while he was on duty and accordingly the FIR was ledged . The disputant was provided medical aid at the Company'sHospital and admitted in the said Hospital in the night hour of 30-7-1998 . He was discharged after providing medical aid on 01-8-1998 with an advice of thre days rest and he was declared unfit for duty for these three days only and he was supposed to be made fit for his duty from 4-8-1998 . But on 3-8-1998 the disputant fell down in the bath room of his quarters and sustained with a fresh injury on his left elbow. He reported to Joda West Hospital and after providing medical aid his case was referred to TataMainHospital , Jamshedpur for treatment and he was under the treatment there from 4-8-1998 to 20-8-1998 . Не returned to Joda and remained unfit for his duty due to his personal injury. The disputant requested to extend Injury OnWorkbenefit for his personal injury caused on his left elbow which was not acceded by the 1st Party- Management on the ground that the injury caused on elbow was not linked with the injury which he had received while he was discharging his duty. The disputant after his discharge from the TataMain Hospital on 20-8-1998 has been reported to JodaWest Hospital from time to time for his treatment and on 12-9-1998 he was referred to Tata Main Hospital for assessment of his fitness . On 14-9-1998 he was again admitted at Tata Main Hospital and a fresh of mental problem was developed with him for which treatment has been provided to him as Manic Depressive Psychosis the case of Hypomania . On this ground the disputant was declared as unfit for his duty continuously for a long period Finally a Medical Board held on 2-9-1999 after due He was on duty on 29 /30-7-1998 from 10 P.M. to 6A.M. On the same night at about 3 A.M. some miscreant attacked him near pillar No. 15. He sustained pain and injury on his head. Awritten report was given before the Officer- in- Charge, Joda Police Station . He was admitted into the TISCO Hospital, Joda on 30-7-1998 and was discharged on 1-8-1998 by Dr. A.K. Das and was advised for rest of 3 days . That, period of treatment was declared as Injury on Work by the 1st Party - Management . The further case of thedisputant is that during the unfit period he fell down in his bath room due to high blood pressure and sustained fracture in his left arm on 3-8-1998 and again admitted in TISCO Hospital , Joda and Dr. A.K. Das declared unfit for sixweeks i.e. starting from 4-8-1998 though he was on Injury onWork till 4-8-1998 . Thereafter he was referred to TISCO Hospital, Jamshedpur and admitted there on 4-8-1998 to 21-8-1998 for treatment of his broken elbow. During his stay at TataMain Hospital on 15-8-1998 he made complaints before the Personal Assistant of the Managing Director against some medical practitioners . An enquiry was conducted on 16-8-1998 by the Vigilance Officer of the Company and his complaint was supported by other patients . The grievance of the disputant is that, the enquiry conducted against the medical practitioner particularly Dr. A. Gupta as a result of which Dr. A. Gupta referred him to Dr. A.K. Gupta, Psychiatrist . He was examined and declared abnormal and was made unfit on mental problem. Thereafter Mr. A.K. Das , called the disputant and referred him to Tata Main Hospital to obtain the fitness certificate . So, the disputant went there but he was admitted there and 4402
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
consideration declared his case as the case of Manic Depressive Psychosis and have recommended to settle his case on medical ground . Accordingly, the disputant had opted for Medical Separation Scheme and offered himself for settling his case under that Scheme . This was approved by the 1st Party Management and the disputant was allowed to go under Medical Separation Scheme and all the dues were paid to him. The 1st Party - Management has further pleaded that, the disputant raised the dispute before the Asst. Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Rourkela without any justification and as he has taken retirement on medical ground all the dues were settled and there was no cause of action for him , but surprisingly a reference was made by the Government of India. According to the 1st Party -Management, the claim of the disputant has got no foundation at all .
4. On the above pleadings of the parties , the following Issues have been settled.
ISSUES
1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?
2. Whether the workman was in duty and sustained injury on work on 4-8-1998 ?
3. Whether the workman is entitled for payment of salary/wages from 4-8-1998 till 6-11-1999 ?
4. Whether the voluntary retirement under the Medical Separation Scheme is applicable to the workman?
5. Whether the workman is entitled for re- instatement with back wages ?
6. To what relief the workman is entitled?
5. The 2nd Party- Workman has examined himself as Workman Witness No. 1 , Dr. Gopal Chandra Kar as Workman Witness No. 2 and he has exhibited two documents in support of his case . On the other hand , the 1st Party - Management has examined two witnesses and has exhibited 22 documents in support of their stand.
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO . I
6. Admittedly, the disputant is a Workman under the 1st Party -Management . He has challenged the order of the 1st Party - Management retiring him on medical ground and declaring him as unfit till date . So , there exists a dispute and rightly the reference has been made by the Government of India to the Tribunal for adjudication . No materials have been placed on behalf of the 1st Party - Management to satisfy the Tribunal that the reference is not maintainable . In other words, I am of the opinion , the present reference is maintainable. Hence , this Issue is answered accordingly.
ISSUE NO . IV & V
7. 1 have taken these two issues for convenient sake . These two issues relate to the voluntary retirement under the Medical Separation Scheme and for reinstatement of the 2nd Party - Workman with payment of back wages . A regards these two issues it has been submitted on behalf of the 1st Party- Management that, those two issues are not related to the terms of the reference and so , the Tribunal
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )] can not express any findings . On the other hand , it is submitted by the disputant who is conducting his case in person that those issues are ancillary matters of the main reference. So, this Tribunal has got jurisdiction to answer those two issues . After hearing of both the parties and after going through the terms of the reference , I am not inclined to accept the submission made on behalf of the 2nd Party -Workman this Tribunal has been asked to answer whether the demand of the 2nd Party for payment of salary/ wages for the period i.e. on Injury On Work from4-8-1998 till date of his retirement is illegal or unjustified . This Tribunal has not been asked to answer whether the retirement of the disputant was on by force or voluntary. In my opinion these facts are not ancillary matters to the main terms of the reference . So, in that case, I agree with the submission made on behalf of the 1st Party- Management that no findings can be given in respect of those two issues by the Tribunal because the Tribunal can not go beyond the terms of the reference . Hence , these two issues are answered accordingly.
ISSUE NO . П
8.As regards this issue the workman has pleaded in his Claim Statement and has stated before this Tribunal that he was attacked on 29/30-7-1998 night while he was on duty and he got some injuries for which he was admitted in the hospital belonging to the 1st Party - Management on 30-7-1998 and was discharged on 1-8-1998 by Dr. A.K. Das and he was advised for rest for three days . He was allowed Injury On Work up to 4-8-1998 . This fact has not been disputed by the 1st Party - Management. In Para-4 of the Written Statement , the 1st Party - Management has pleaded that the disputant was admitted in the hospital on 30-7-1998 and he was discharged after providing medical aid on 1-8-1998 with an advise for three days rest and he was declared unfit for duty for those three days only and hewas supposed to be made fit in his duties from 4-8-1998. So that would suggest that the workman has got injury on 29/30-7-1998 and was advised to take rest . That means he was entitled for Injury On Work up to 4-8-1998. This Issue isanswered accordingly.
ISSUE NO . III
9. This issue is the main and important issue for adjudication . The 2nd Party - Workman has accepted the retirement on Medical Separation Scheme on 6-11-1999 . According to the 2nd Party he got elbow injury due to the injury caused to him while he was on duty and thereafter withoutdeclaring him fit the Medical Board declaring him unfit on the ground of psychiatric patient though actually he was not suffering from that diseases. On the other hand, the 1st Party- Management has resisted the claim of the 2nd Party -Workman on the ground that , the injury caused to the 2nd Party - Workman by fall in the bath room is not connected with the injury he had received while he was on duty. Both the parties have filed documents in support of their case . It is admitted that , the 2nd Party - Workman got injury while he was on duty and he was treated by the company doctor and was advised to take rest for three days. This fact would suggest that , the workman was not fit for three days because he was advised to take rest . The 2nd Party has stated that while he was advised to take rest [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4403
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
workman and diseases from which he was suffering are inter- related to each other and not separate . So , in that case he should have been allowed Injury On Work till he submitted application for his retirement on Medical Separation Scheme . In view of the above findings the workman is entitled for payment ofsalary/ wages from 4-8- 1998 till 6-11-1999 . Hence , this Issue is answered accordingly.
ISSUE NO . VI
10. Inview of my findings given in respect of Issue No. II , the workman is entitled for Injury On Work from 30-7-1998 to 6-11-1999 and that he is entitled for payment ofsalary/wages from 4-8-1998 to 6-11-1999.
11. Reference is answered accordingly
Dictated & Corrected by me.
S. K. DHAL, Presiding Officer
BEFORE THE C.G.I.T. -CUM-LABOUR COURT: BHUBANESWAR
Tr. L.D. Case No. 81/2001
List of the Witnesses Examined on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman.
W.W. No. 1 . Shri Bhubaneswar Thakur ( 2nd Party- himself).
W.W. No. 2. Dr. Gopal Chandra Kar..
List of the Witnesses Examined on behalf of the 1st Party- Management.
M.W. No. 1. Shri Nirakar Panda .
M. W. No. 2. Dr. Angil Kr. Gupta.
List of Documents exhibited on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman.
Ext. -1 .
Xerox copy ofFIR .
Ext. -2.
Copy of the Award passed in terms of the settlement which do form part of the award in I.D. Case No. 14/95(C) .
Ext-3.
Copy ofdischarge certificate , Joda Hospital along with fitness unfitness certificate from 4-8-98 , copy of T.M.H. discharge certificate from 4-8-98 to 21-8-98 and copy ofT.M.H. discharge certificate from 14-9-98 to 16-9-98 .
Ext.-4.
Original outdoor ticket .
Ext-4/ 1 . Signature of Prof. Dr. Gopal Ch . Kar in the outdoor ticket.
Ext-5.
Original medical history report of Shri Bhubaneswar Thakur.
Ext-6.
The original reference made by Surgical Specialist , Central Hospital , Joda.
List of Documents exhihited on behalf of the 1st Party- Management.
Ext.-A.
due to high blood pressure he fell down in the bath room and sustained fracture in his left elbow on 3-8-1998 and so he was admitted in the hospital and Dr. A.K. Das declared him unfit for six weeks i.e. from 4-4-1998 . This fact has not been disputed by the 1st Party- Management . The only controversy is that the 2nd Party -Workman can not be declared Injury On Work from 4-8-1998 because the injury caused to him due to fracture in his left elbow is not connected for the injury he had received while he was in duty. Subsequently, though the 2nd Party- Workman was declared fit for elbow injury he was declared unfit on the ground that he is a psychiatric patient . No materials have been placed before the Tribunal that the injury caused to the 2nd Party while he was on duty can not cause the injury he sustained when he fell down in his bath room . It is quite natural that , the workman like the 2nd Party must be in a tense mood when he had received injuries while discharging his duties. It is quite natural that , that may lead for high blood pressure . No body intentionally can not fall down to get injuries or fracture . It is not the case that, the 2nd Party- Workman intentionally to avail the Injury On Work fell down in the bath room and sustained fracture in his left elbow. So , in that case I am of the opinion that when he got injuries on his elbow sustained fracture during the period of his rest as advised by the Medical Officer he is entitled to avail the Injury On Work from 4-9-1998 for six months as advised by Dr. A.K. Das . Coming to the next period the 2nd Party has submitted that , once Injury On Work was allowed to him it can not be discontinued till he is declared fit . Accordingto him without any basis and without any foundation he was declared unfit on the ground that he is a psychiatric patient . No doubt in this case one of the Doctor of the company has been examined on behalf of the 1st Party - Managementto support their stand . On the other hand, the 2nd Party- Workman has examined one doctor who is the Professor of Psychiatric Department of S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital , Cuttack. Accordingto him the 2nd Party appeared before him in the out door on 10-4-1999 and his name was registered being referred by the Surgery Specialist, Central Hospital , Joda. His further evidence is that , the 2nd Party wanted a certificate as to whether he was suffering from any mental abnormality. He was advised by him to come again on 12-4-1999 . On examination , the 2nd Party was found by the Professor and his associates to be fit for duty. So , this fact was recorded in his out door ticket . I do not find any reason to dis- believe the evidence of the Doctor who has been examined onbehalf of the 2nd Party -Workman because he is no way related to the 2nd Party. The 1st Party -Management has tried to support his case through their witness No. 2 and relying on Ext -P and Q. The Ext -P appears to be a report of the medical settlement board held on 4-3-1999 . It reads that, the workman was declared as unfit on the ground that he is suffering from manic depressive psychosis . No details are found on which ground this information was recorded. Similarly in the case of Ext.-Q. After hearing of both the parties and perusing the relevant documents filed byboth the parties, I am of the opinion, that the workman is entitled for Injury On Work from 30-7-1998 to till his date of his retirement i.e. 6-11-1999 because the injuries caused to the
Copy ofthe letter dated 2-11-1999 of G.M. OreMines& Quarry.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4404
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
Ext.-B.
which was received by the Central Government on 22-05-2003 .
Application dated 15-9-99 ofMr. B. Thakur for retirement under M.S.S.
Ext.-C.
Copy of the retirement scheme dated 14-1-1998 under medical ground.
[No. L-43012/31/2000 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
Ext.-D.
ANNEXURE
Copy of letter, dated 20-9-2000 of Shri B. Thakur to the Accounts Section asking the details of the payment made .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD .
Ext.-E.
Copy of letter, dated 20-9-2000 of TISCO Management to Shri . B. Thakur.
PRESENT
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer Ext -F. Copy of letter, dated 6-11-99 of Shri B. Thakurto the G.M. (OMQ) Tata Steel Mines Division, Noamundi .
Inthe matter of an Industrail Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) ofthe I.D. Act. , 1947.
Ext.-G.
Reference No. 44 of 2001
Copy of letter of Shri B. Thakur to drop the proceeding.
PARTIES:
Ext.-H.
Recommendation of the Medical Board .
Ext.-J.
Employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workman.
Copy of application submitted by the Disputant for Medical Separation Scheme.
APPEARANCES :
Ext-K.
Copy of standing order.
Onbehalf ofthe workman : Shri K. Chakravorty, Advocate. Ext-M-M/8 Copy of medical attendance slips in respect ofthe disputant .
Onbehalf of the employers : Shri D. K. Verma , Advocate. Ext.-N.
Copies of the acquaintance of the disputant starting from July 1998 to Oct. 1999.
State : Jharkhand
Industry Copper Mines
Ext.-P.
Copy ofthe opinion of the Medical Board.
Dated, Dhanbad, the 5th May, 2003 .
Ext.-Q.
AWARD
Copy of the opinion of the 2nd Medical Board.
Mark-X. The signature dtd. 6-11-99 appearing in the application to the Management to withdraw all the cases filed against the Management .
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2003
TheGovt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) . (d) of the I. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-43012/ 31/2000/IR(M) dated, the 13th February, 2001 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Management ofHindustan CopperLtd./ICC in terminating the services of Shri A. S. Paul is justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"
का०आ ० 1714.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद न. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 44/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 43012/31/2000-आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव
NewDelhi , the 23rd May, 2003
2. In course of hearing of the instant reference Mr. K. Chakravorty, Advocate for the workman by filling a petition submitted that as the concerned workman involved inthe dispute is dead, they do not like to proceed with the hearing of this case and accordingly necessary order may be passed to dismiss the case for non -prosecution . Mr. D.K. Verma, learned Advocate for the management raised no objection . Perused the petition and heared the learned Advocates on both sides . In view of the facts and circumstances , stated above I consider that there is no scope to proceed with the hearing of this case . Hence the instant reference case is dismissed on the ground of the death of the concerned workman as no positive award could be passed.
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer .
S.O.1714. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 44/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workman, 4405
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
For the Workmen
: No Appearance .
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2003
Mumbai , the 2nd May 2003
AWARD
का.आ. 1715.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. रोशन खान एण्ड संस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुंबई नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 19/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The Government of India Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L -31011 /2/2000/IR (M) dated 24-1-2000 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
[सं. एल-31011/2/2000- आई.आर. ( विविध ) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003
"Whether the action of M/ s . Roshan Khan & Sons Contractor of M/ s . United Liner Agencies of India , (P.) Ltd. in not providing jobs to eight numbers of workmen(as per list) w.e.f. 23-8-1999 is justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"
ANNEXURE
Listof Watchmen of M/ s . Roshan Khan & Sons .
Jawahar Khan 1.
2. Nazir Khan
3. Shamiullah Khan
4. Shabir Khan
S.O 1715. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 19/2000 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Roshan Khan & Sons and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 22-5-2003 .
5. Ram Sajivan Patel
6. Srinivas Vishwakarma
[No. L- 31011/2/2000 - IR (M)] B.M. DAVID, Under Secy.
7. K.N. Mohan
ANNEXURE
8. Tukaram D. Misal
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . II , MUMBAI
PRESENT;
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 2/19 OF 2000 ,
Employers in Relation to the Management of
M/s. United Liner Agencies of India (P) Ltd. , M/ s . Roshan Khan & Sons .
M/s. United Liner Agencies of India (P) Ltd.
The Managing Director SaptBuilding, 1st Floor, 18, J.N. Heredia Marg, Ballard Estate , Mumbai -400 039 .
2. Vide Statement of Claim (Exhibit - 10 ) Bombay Transport and Dock Workers Union pleaded that 8 workers as above named in the enclosed list are in the continuous employment of M/s . Roshan Khan & Sons . However, since 23-8-99 the employer stopped giving them work which is illegal therefore the union contended to direct the employer to provide them work regularly with monetery benefits .Management resisted the claim of union by filing Written Statement (Exhibit - 11 ) contending that Shri P.K. Sharma has no locus standi to raise an industrial dispute on behalf of the workman under the provisions of the Trade Unions Act and further contended that the concerned workers have not been terminated and they are reporting to work . Consequently reference being devoid of substance be dismissed in with costs in limine.
M/s . Roshan Khan & Sons ,
The Proprietor,
15, Goa Street , 1st Floor, Amin House , Room No. 28-35 , Ballard Estate, Mumbai -400 038 .
AND THEIR WORKMEN
3. On the basis of the pleadings issues were framed at (Exhibit- 14) on 20-3-2002. Consequently matter was fixed for filing affidavit by the union in lieu of Examination in Chief on 10-6-2002, 10-7-2002, 5-9-2002, 29-10-2002, 11-12-2002, 31-12-2002, 17-2-2003 , 1-4-2003 and as last chance today on 2-5-2003. However, record shows that inspite of giving sufficient time nonc appeared on behalf of the union nor filed affidavit which indicate that the union is not interested in prosecuting the reference . Therefore the reference deserves to be disposed of for want of evidence and hence the order:-
The Bombay Transport and Dock Workers Union The President , Room No. 12 , 1st Floor, Carnac Bunder,
ORDER
Mumbai.
APPEARANCES :
Mr. B.K. Hegde , Advocate .
Reference stand disposed of for want of evidence .. S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer For the Employer Nos . : 1and 2 4406
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2003
का.आ. 1716.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भवान्थपुर लाईम स्टोन माईन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-29012/70/97- आई. आर. ( विविध) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003
S.O. 1716. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/1998 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bhawanthpur Lime Stone Mine and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 22-5-2003
[No. L -29012/ 70/97 - IR (M)] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2 ) AT DHANBAD.
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer .
In the matter of an Industrial dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947.
REFERENCE NO . 3 OF 1998
Parties:
Employers in relation to the management ofBhawanthpur Limestone Mines and theirworkman.
Appearances:
Onbehalf of the workman
None.
None.
Onbehalf of the employers
State: Jharkhand
Industry:Mine
Dated, Dhanbad , the 5th May, 2003.
ORDER
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, the management side though appeared on one occassion and filed authorisation did not submit any W. statement on their part. It is seen from the record that the instant reference wasreceived by this Tribunal on 19-1-98 and since then it ispending for disposal . Registered notices and show cause notices were issued to the workman as well as the management but inspite of the issuance of notices they failed to turn up . In terms of Rule 10B of the I.D. Central Rules , 1957 submission of W.S. by the concerned workman within 15 days is a mandatory one . The concerned workman not only violated the said provision of the Rules butalso did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate ofthe reference made by the Ministry for its disposal. The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests withthe concerned workman/union and the management to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94 ) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both the parties remain absent. There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents. There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S. such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance for the workman and the management inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman personally excepting under provision of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiving notices did not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice untill and unless the attitude of the union is changed , I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation ofboth sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result. This attitude shows clearly that the workmanside is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-29012/ 70/97 - IR ( Misc . ) , dated the 30th December, 1997 .
SCHEDULE
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is to scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer "Whether the action of the management of Bhawanthpur Limestone Mines in discriminating and victimising Shri B.S. Singh by demoting him from L- 5 to L -4 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?" .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4407 नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2003
not perverse. Consequently point crops on as to whether the action of the management Corporation in imposiną, the punishment ofdismissal upon workman isjustified cr not in so far as issue Nos . 3 &4 are concerned vide (Ex - 14 ) as mentioned below:-
Issues
Findings Yes का.आ. 1717.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पो. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, मुंबई नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 151/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2003 ) को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30012/20/99- आई. आर. ( विविध) ] बी.एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
3. Whether the action of the management is dismissing the services of Narayan Dabholkar w.e.f. 14/5/97 is justified ?
New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003
4. Ifnot , to what relief the work- man is entitled to ?
As per orderbelow.
REASONS
S.O. 1717 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 151/99) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Mumbai No. 2 as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on22-5-2003
2. On persual of the record it is seen interim Award was published on 20-11-2002 (Exhibit - 29) . Matter was fixed for ! cading evidence on the quantum of punishment on 23-1-03, 27-2-03 , 27-3-03 , 17-4-03 and 2-5-03 . Workman did not turn up nor lead evidence. Consequently management vide purshis (Exhibit-30) contended to decide the reference without affidavit of workman .
[No. L - 30012/20/ 99 - IR (M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT MUMBAI
3. It is well settled position that penalty imposed must be commensurate with the gravity of the offence charged and that the discretion conferred by Section 11 -A on the tribunal is to be exercised considering the case as a whole . In Syndicate Bank Ltd. V/s . Its workmen 1996 ILLJ pg . 440 Their Lordship observed :-
Present :
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer . Reference No. CGIT- 2/ 151 OF 1999
Industrial adjudicators should be very careful before it interferes with the orders made by the management in discharge of their Managerial functions. " EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
The Manager ( IR) , The Manager ( IR),
Bharat Petroleum Corpn . Ltd. BharatPetroleum Corpn . Ltd. Mahul Refinery, Chambur Mumbai 400 074
AND Their Workmen
BharatPetroleum Corpn. ( Refinery) Emp.Union, The General Secretary, InFront of Bori Chawl , Shantilal Compound , Jawahar Nagar, Khar, (E) Mumbai
The charge proved against the workman is that he had committed theft of company's articles . The employee is required to maintain good conduct and discipline. Indiscipline cannot be condoned on the spacious ground that it was not actuated by ulterior motives or by extraneous considerations . Service Regulations require every employee to take possible steps to protect the interests of the industry and to discharge the duties with utmost integrity and honesty, breach of which is a misconduct. Considering the proved charge which amounts to grave misconduct the only punishment of dismissal imposed upon the workman is proportionate . In this view of the matter the action of the management is totally justified. Consequently workman is not entitled to any relief. Issues are answered accordingly and hence the order :-
ORDER
Appearances: For the Employer
Mr. R. S. Pai , Advocate
For the Workmen
No Appearance
The action of the management of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Refinery) ,Mahul , Mumbai in dismissing the services of Mr. Narayan D. Dabholkar w.c.f. 14-5-97 is justGed
Mumbai , Dated 2nd May , 2003
AWARD- PART - II
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्न्नी, 23 मई, 2003
का० आ०1718. श्रद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का १५ ) की भाग 17 क अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार में ० गंगाराम कालूराम ( लाईम रन्टीन माईन ओनर ) के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों By the interim Award did 16th October 2002 this Tribunal held that the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman Dabholkar was as per the Primcipais of Natural Justice and the findings of the inquiry officer are
1590 Gi/03-18 4408
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय कोटा के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-29012/39/96- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ] बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003 S.O.1718 .- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal Kota as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/s . Gangaram Kaluram, Lime StoneMine owner and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 22-5-03 .
[No. L -29012/39/96 -IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy:
अनुबंध
न्यायाधीश, औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण/केन्द्रीय/ कोटा राजस्थान/ पीठासीन अधिकारी- श्रीमणि शंकर व्यास आर० एच ०जे०एस० निदेश प्रकरण क्रमांक औ ० न्या०/केन्द्रीय/-1/97 दिनांक स्थापित 3-1-97
प्रसंग : भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के आदेश सं. एल. 29012/39/96- आई आर. /विविध दिनांक 14-10- निर्देश अन्तर्गत धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( घ)
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947
मध्य
प्रतापचन्द पुत्र श्री सुन्दरलाल यादव निवासी सातखेड़ी जिला कोटा
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] करने की कार्यवाही वैध एवं उचित है , यदि नहीं तो कर्मचारी किस अनुतोष का अधिकारी है "
2. निर्देश/विवाद, न्यायाधिकरण से प्राप्त होने पर पंजीबद्ध उपरान्त पक्षकारों को सूचना विधिवत रूप में जारी की गयी । 3. प्रार्थी श्रमिक प्रतापचन्द्र की ओर से क्लेम स्टेटमेन्ट प्रस्तुत कर संक्षेप में यह अभिकथित किया गया है कि प्रार्थी, अप्रार्थीगण फर्म में नवम्बर, 1994 से नियोजित था । अप्रार्थी के यहां दि. 29-6-95 केखान फाड़ने के बाद खान में वर्षाकाल के लिए काम बन्द हो गया और बाद से सितम्बर माह में काम प्रारम्भ हुआ, किन्तु अप्रार्थी द्वारा उसे काम पर नहींलिया गया और 30-6-95 से बिना कोई नोटिस अथवा नोटिस वेतन व छंटनी मुआवजे के व बोनस, अवकाश, ग्रेच्युटी आदि की राशि अदा किया बिना सेवा से अनुचित एवं अवैध तरीके से पृथक् कर दिया । प्रार्थी ने 15-11-95 को व तदुपरान्त 5-12-95 को पत्र भेजकर ड्यूटी पर लेने का निवेदन दिया किन्तु उसे न तो ड्यूटी पर लिया गया एवं न ही प्रत्युत्तर दिया गया । अन्त में प्रार्थना की गयी है कि उसे अप्रार्थी द्वारा उक्त प्रकार से सेवा से पृथक्किया जाना अनुचित एवं अवैध घोषित करते हुए पिछले सम्पूर्ण वेतन व समस्त सेवा लाभों सहित सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित किये जाने का अनुतोष प्रदान किया जावे ।
--प्रार्थी श्रमिक
एवं
मैसर्स गंगाराम, कालूराम लाईम स्टोन खान मालिक, सातखेड़ी तहसील रामभजमण्डी, जिला कोटा
उपस्थित
4. अप्रार्थी नियोजक की ओर से क्लेम को अस्वीकार करते हुए प्रतिवाद स्वरूप यह अभिकथित किया गया है कि प्रार्थी की सेवायें अप्रार्थी द्वारा अभी समाप्त नहीं की गयी, बल्किउसने दि. 29-6-95 को स्वेच्छा से अन्य दूसरे स्थान पर अधिक वेतन मिलने के कारण कार्य छोड़ा था । प्रार्थी ने दि. 11-9-95 को उपस्थित होकर इस आशय का प्रार्थन- पत्र पेश किया कि उसे अब अप्रार्थी के यहां काम नहीं करना है और उसने स्वेच्छा से काम बन्द कर दिया है , उसे ग्रेच्युटी का भुगतान कर दिया जावे जिस पर उसे दि. 28-10-95 को ग्रेच्युटी का भुगतान भी कर दिया गया। चूंकि प्रार्थी द्वारा स्वयं स्वेच्छा से कार्य छोड़ा गया है इसलिए पक्षकारों के मध्य किसी प्रकार का कोई विवाद शेष नहीं रहने से क्लेम विवाद गोपनीय नहीं है और प्रार्थी किसी प्रकार का कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है, अतः क्लेम प्रार्थी अस्वीकार कर निरस्तकिया जावे ।
--अप्रार्थी नियोजक
प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि:
श्रीडी. आर. द्विवेदी
अप्रार्थी नियोजक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि:
5. साक्ष्य में प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने स्वयं का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है, जबकि अप्रार्थी नियोजक की ओर से गंगाराम को परीक्षित करवाया गया है । उभयपक्ष की आरे से प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य भी प्रस्तुत की गयी है जिसका यथासमय उल्लेख किया जावेगा ।
श्री डी. सी. जैन
अधिनिर्णय दिनांक: 22-4-2003
अधिनिर्णय
भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली द्वारा अपनी उक्त प्रासंगिक आदेश दिनांक14-10- द्वारा निम्न निर्देश/ विवाद, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( जिसे तदुपरान्त " अधिनियम " से सम्बोधित किया जावेगा ) की धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( घ ) के अन्तर्गत इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णयार्थ सम्प्रेषित किया गया है : -
" क्या प्रबन्धक, मैसर्स गंगाराम कालूराम , लाईम स्टोन खान मालिक सातखेड़ी तहसील रामभजमंड़ी जिला कोटा द्वारा उनके कर्मकार श्री प्रतापचन्द्र पुत्र शंकरलाल यादव को रि. 30-6-95 से सेवा से पृथक 6. उभयपक्षके विद्वान प्रतिनिधिगण की बहस सुनी गयी , पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध सामग्री व साक्ष्य का ध्यानपूर्वक परिशीलन किया गया । 7. विद्वान प्रतिनिधि प्रार्थी का कथन है कि अप्राथी ने प्रार्थी को नवम्बर, 1994 में नियुक्त किया था । दि. 29-6-95 को खान फाड़ने के पश्चात्अप्रार्थी की खान में वर्षाकाल में काम बन्द हो गया था, बाद में काम शुरू हुआ, परन्तु अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को काम पर नहीं लिया गया और उसकी सेवायें दि. 30-6-95 से समाप्त कर दी गयी । प्रार्थी की सेवायें समाप्त किये जाने से पूर्व कोई नोटिस अथवा नोटिस वेतन व छंटनी मुआवजा आदि न तो दिया एवं न ही प्रस्तावित किया । यह भी तर्क दिया कि जब वह 29-6-95 के बाद अप्रार्थी के यहां गया तो उसे धमकी दी गयी कि तुम्हारा हिसाब ले जाओ जिस पर वह अपना हिसाब 4409 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
लेने को तैयार हो गया और उसी समय उससे खाली वाऊचर पर रसीदी टिकिट लगवाकर हस्ताक्षर करवा लिये गये । अन्त में यह कथन किया गया है कि प्रार्थी को उक्त प्रकार से सेवा से हटाया जाना अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ के आज्ञापक प्रावधानों के विपरीत है और सेवा पृथक्करण आदेश अवैध व प्रभावशून्य है । खण्डन में विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का कथन है कि प्रार्थी दि. 29-6-95 को अपनी स्वेच्छा से कार्य छोड़कर चला गया था जो उसके प्रार्थना - पत्रों से प्रमाणित है क्योंकि उसे दूसरे स्थान पर अधिक वेतन मिल रहा था । तत्पश्चात् प्रार्थी 11-9-95 को उपस्थितहुआ और उसने इस आशय का प्रार्थना- पत्र पेश किया किमैंने स्वेच्छा से आपका काम बन्द कर दिया गया है , अतः ग्रेच्युटी का भुगतान किया जावे जिस पर उसे दि. 28-10-95 को ग्रेच्युटी का भुगतान कर दिया गया । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी द्वारा स्वेच्छा से कार्य छोड़ने के कारण अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ के आज्ञापक प्रावधानों की पालना किया जाना आवश्यक नहीं था । प्रार्थी ने स्वयं प्रतिपरीक्षा में , प्रदर्श डब्ल्यू. 1 जिसमेंकि स्वेच्छा से कार्य छोड़ने का विवरण है, अपने हाथ से लिखकर देनास्वीकार किया है और यह भी आगे अंकित किया है कि उसने बिना किसी दबाव के अपनी मरजी से स्वेच्छा से लिखकर दिया था । फिर आगे यह भी कहा है कि उस पर दबाव डालकर लिखवाया गया था । आगे उनसे यह भी कहा है कि ग्रेच्युटी व बोनस का विवाद न्यायालय में है , नौकरी से सम्बन्धित विवाद नहीं है, इससे प्रकट है कि प्रार्थी ने स्वेच्छा से ही नौकरी छोड़ी थी ।
9. उभयपक्ष के तकों के सम्बन्ध में अब हम अभिलेख पर आयी हुई साक्ष्य पर विचार करेंगे । प्रार्थी ने अपने बयानों में प्रेमचन्द्र पुत्र रामचन्द्र के पिट के पास एक खेत में खान फाड़ने की बात अंकित की है एवं यह भी कहा है कि ऐसा नहीं करने पर गंगाराम द्वारा उसे जान से मारने की धमकी दी गयी थी। उसका यह कथन , उसके अभिवचनों के विपरीत है और ऐसी साक्ष्य पर विधिनुसार अवलम्ब नहीं किया जा सकता । प्रार्थी ने अपनी प्रतिपरीक्षा में स्वेच्छा से स्वीकार किया है कि उसने त्याग - पत्र अपने हाथ से लिखकर प्रदर्श डब्ल्यू. 1 दिया था और आगे यह भी कहा है कि ग्रेच्युटी व बोनस का विवाद न्यायालय में है , नौकरी से सम्बन्धित कोई विवाद नहीं है । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी स्वयं मानता है कि नौकरी के सम्बन्ध में कोई विवाद नहीं है , जबकि मौजूदा यह निर्देश/विवाद, दि. 30-6-95 से उसे सेवा से पृथक् करने की वैधता एवं उचितता के सम्बन्ध में इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णयार्थ प्राप्त हुआ है । प्रार्थी की स्वीकारोक्तिअनुसार इस बाबत इसके व अप्रार्थी के मध्य कोईविवाद ही नहीं है तो ऐसी स्थिति में अप्रार्थी का यह कथन स्वीकार्य हो जाता है कि प्रार्थी ने अपना नियोजन स्वेच्छा से समाप्त मानते हुए प्रार्थना- पत्र देकर ग्रेच्युटी की राशि प्राप्त की थी व ग्रेच्युटी की राशि प्राप्त करने से ए से बी हस्ताक्षर रेवेन्यूटिकिट रसीद पर भी दि. 28-10-95 को उसी के हैं । इस प्रकार उसने मार्च , 1989 से जून , 1995 तक की ग्रेच्युटी का भुगतान कुल 5850 रु. अप्रार्थी पक्ष से प्राप्त कर लिया था और स्वेच्छा से अपना नियोजन समाप्त कर लिया था । ऐसी स्थिति में प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी द्वारा दि. 30-6-95 से सेवा से पृथक् करने का कोई प्रश्न ही उत्पन्न नहीं होता। परिणामतः प्रार्थी द्वारा स्वेच्छा से आना नियोजन समाप्त करने के कारण अधिनियमान्तर्गत कोई संरक्षण प्राप्त नहीं होने से वह किसी प्रकार का कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है।
परिणामतः भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली द्वारा सम्प्रेषित निर्देश/विवाद को अधिनिर्णित कर इस प्रकार उत्तरित किया जाता है कि स्वयं प्रार्थी श्रमिक' प्रतापचन्द्र पुत्र शंकरलाल यादव ने अप्रार्थी नियोजक' मैं. गंगाराम , कालूराम, लाईमस्टोन खान मालिक, सातलखेड़ी तहसील रामगज मण्डी, जिला कोटा के यहां से स्वेच्छा से अपनी सेवाओं का परित्याग किया है इसलिए उसे अप्रार्थी द्वारा दि. 30-6-95 को सेवा से पृथक् किये जाने का कोई प्रश्न ही उत्पन्न नहीं होता, अतः प्रार्थी द्वारा स्वयं अपना नियोजन समाप्त करने व अधिनियमान्तर्गत कोई संरक्षण प्राप्त नहीं होने के कारण अप्रार्थी पक्ष से किसी प्रकार का कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।
इस अधिनिर्णय को समुचित सरकार को नियमानुसार प्रकाशनार्थ भिजवाया जावे ।
मणिशंकर व्यास , न्यायाधीश
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2003
का० आ०1719.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केबीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नई दिल्ली, के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 145/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-12012/188/91 - आईआर ( बी. II ) ] 8. उभयपक्ष के तर्कों के सन्दर्भ में अब हम अभिलेख पर पायी हुई साक्ष्य पर विवेचन करेंगे । प्रार्थी ने अपने शपथ- पत्र में, स्टेटमेन्ट ऑफ क्लेम के तथ्यों की पुष्टि की है व अन्य तथ्य यह भी बताया है कि प्रेमचन्द्र पुत्र रामचन्द्र के पिट में खान फाड़ने के लिए मुझे जून , 1995 में श्री गंगाराम ने कहा था, इस पिट पर लीज श्री गंगाराम जी की थी । मुझे गंगाराम जी ने यह भी कहा था कि इस पिट के साथ - साथ पास वाले खेत में भी खान फाड़ देना , मैंने खेत होने व खेत मालिक चन्द्राजी के आपत्ति करने के कारण खेत में खान फाड़ने से मना कर दिया, इस पर दि. 10-6-95 को गंगाराम ने मुझे धमकी दी कि यदि पास वाला खेत नहीं फाड़ा तो फिर खान पर काम पर मत आना नहीं तो जान से मार दूंगा । मैंने प्रेमचन्द्र पुत्र रामचन्द्र के पिट पर खान 29-6-95 को फाड़ दी, किन्तु पास के खेत को रहने दिया । इस बात का पता लगने पर 30-6-95 को तथा 2-7-95 को उसे गंगाराम ने फिर धमकी दी जिस बाबत उसने रिपोर्ट प्रदर्श डब्ल्यू. 1 दर्ज पुलिस थाने में करवायी । इसके बाद उसे काम पर नहीं लिया गया । आगे कथन किया है कि मैं हिसाब लेने को तैयार हो गया तो खाली वाउचर पर रसीदी टिकिट लगवाकर हस्ताक्षर करवा लिये और बाद में 5000 रु. देना चाहा जो काफी कम थे । मझे ग्रेच्युटी , रिट्रेचर्मेन्ट कम्पनशेसन, नोटिस पे, बोनस व अवकाश आदि की राशि लगभग 50-55 मिलनी चाहिए थी । उसने उक्त 5000 लेने से मना कर दिया। प्रतिपरीक्षा में इस गवाह ने प्रदर्श डब्ल्यू. 1 उसके द्वारा हाथ से लिखकर देने को कहा है और यह भी कहा है कि बोनस व ग्रेच्युटी का विवाद न्यायालय में है, नौकरी के सम्बन्ध में कोई विवाद नहीं है । खण्डन में अप्रार्थी गवाह गंगाराम ने अपने शपथ - पत्र में जबाव के तथ्यों की पुष्टि की है और मुख्य रूप से यह कहा है कि प्रार्थी स्वेच्छा से नौकरी छोड़कर चला गया था, उसे नौकरी से निकाला नहीं गया था। इस सम्बन्धमें पत्र प्रदर्श एम. 1 व एम. 2 से इस तथ्य की पुष्टि होती है ।
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 4410
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003
S.O.1719- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 145/91 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-5-03.
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] of the Disciplinary Authority the enquiry was being reopened to enable the workman to produce his wit- nesses . But according to workman this belated oppor- tunity was of no avail , as the two witnesses whom the workman wanted to examine in the earlier were not will- ing to appear as witnesses due to pressure and fear of the management being employees of the bank. The re- opened enquiry was closed on 24.4.89 .
[No. L- 12012/188/91 -IR (B- II) ]
C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI Presiding Officer: Shri B.N. Pandey
I.D. No. 145/91
Shri O.P. Singh ,
R/ o. L - 1/ 132 , Shaheed Gunj ,
Workman
Agra.
Versus
The Regional Manager,
Central Bank of India,
Regional Office,
1271 , Bhairon Bazar,
Belangunj , Agra .
... Respondent/Management.
AWARD
The following industrial dispute has been referred to this Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court for its adjudica- tion, vide Order No. L- 12012/ 188/91 - IR (B - II ) dated 26.9.91 of theMinistry of Labour, Govt . of India:-
"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in dismissing Shri O.P. Singh , Clerk from the services of the Bank is justified? If not , to whatrelief is the workman concerned entitled ?" 2. The brief facts as alleged in the pleadings of the par- ties are that Shri O.P. Singh , the workman , was appointed in the services of the bank w.e.f. 5.5.80 as clerk and while work- ing at Belangunj Agra Branch , he was placed under suspen- sion vide memo dated 31.5.88 and explanation was called for vide memo dated 20.6.88 . The workman submitted his letter dated 9.7.88 requesting for inspection of documents referred in the Memo to enable him to give his explanation . He was issued a charge sheet dated 8.8.88 by the Regional Manager and by the very charge sheet the departmental enquiry was instituted without giving any opportunity to submit reply to the charge sheet dated 8.8.88. The Enquiry Officer Shri R.P. Gautam commenced the enquiry on 13.9.88 and concluded it on 4.1.89 . The Bank examined 5 witnesses in all, the Enquiry Officer concluded the proceedings with directions to submit the written arguments of the parties .
3. However, the workman received a notice dated 25.3.89 from the Enquiry Officer informing that under the instructions 4.Afterlapse of five months from the closure of reopened enquiry on 24.4.89 , the workman received the findings dated 29.6.89 of the Enquiry Officer on 25.9.89 alongwith show-cause dated 22.9.89 proposing pun- ishment of dismissal . By this very show -cause dated 22.9.89, the workman was also asked to appear before Disciplinary Authority on 26.9.89 for personal hearing .
5. It is alleged that time to reply to show -cause was sought by workman . But this request was rejected by the Disciplinary Authority vide letter dated 26.6 80 The personal hearing was closed on 30.9.89 and pro- posed punishment of dismissal was confirmed.
6. Theworkman filed appeal dated 24.11.89 which was according to workman's version without consider- ing the grounds of appeal particularly the request for referring the signatures/initials on the questioned elec- tricity bills to handwriting expert for identification was dismiss by the Appellate Authority by non - speaking and unreasoned order dated 17.5.90 .
7. The Management filed Affidavit of Shri R.K Verma, Regional Manager Agra Regional office in its evidence before this Tribunal on 20.3.1993 . Thereafter theManagement moved an application dated 12.7.1993 for replacing the Affidavit of Shri Verma by Affidavit of Shri H.C. Desai , Disciplinary Authority and Shri R.P. Gautam, Enquiry Officer. The ground for replacing the Affidavit ofShri R.K. Verma as stated in the Application that Shri R.K. Verma had no personal and direct knowl- edgeof the case. But the Management has not filed any Affidavit as sought in the Application. However Shri R.K. Verma was produced for examination in evidence before this Tribunal on 24.1.94 . The workman filed his ownAffidavit and gave his own evidence on 2.1.1995 . Inthese backgrounds I am to decide the action of the management in dismissing the workman from service.
8. The gist of charges as per the charge sheet dated8.8.88 is that the workman received payments from parties for electricity bills , but not accounted them.
9. On the question of validity of enquiry the sub- missions made by the workman's representative are :-
Bythe very charge sheet dated 8.8.88 the enquiry was instituted without giving any opportunity to reply to the charge sheet . Appointing Enquiry Officer without giving opportunity to submit re- ply to the charge sheet is in violation of clause 19.1 ofBipartite Settlement. The workman had also raised objection in this regard in the Enquiry on 13.9.88. But this objection was ignored . It is rel- evant to extract clause 19.1 of the First Bipartite settlement hereunder :
4411 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
(2002 I LLJ 270 Madras) . The relevant portion of thejudge- ment is extracted hereunder :
" 19.1-In suppression of paragraph 18.20, 18.24 and 18.28 ofthe Desai Award, a person against whom disci- plinary action is proposed or likely to be taken shall, in the first instance be informed of the particulars of the charge against him and he shall have a proper opportu- nity to give his explanations to such particulars."
10. The object of giving opportunity to submit reply to the charge sheet is that the Disciplinary Authority would be able to decide after considering the reply/explanation of the delinquent whether still an enquiry is necessary or not . Seeking of reply/ explanation to charge sheet is to enable the Disciplinary Authority to apply his mind and to take a decision either to put end or for further proceedings of the enquiry Clause 19.1 of the First Bipartite settlement also envisages the above object . The workman representative also relied on the judgment of Bhaskar Patra Vs. Chairman- Managing Director, Punjab & Sind Bank (2000 I LLJ 802) . The Hon'ble High Court ofOrissa has held:
" The learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe writ petitioner citing the judgement delivered by the Orissa High Court in Bhagirathi Sahu University ofAgriculture and Technology wherein it is held that in disciplinary proceedings , the enquiry officer cannot be appointed at the time of framing and service of charges on delinquent without an opportunity to show cause , which would only show the preconceived mind and exhort that this proposition squarely applies to the case in hand . There is no denying of the fact that an opportunity afforded to the delinquent to explain the charges will not only preliminarily reflect the true state of affairs but also lot of informations regarding either the truthfulness or the falsity of the charges or some of the charges atleast, would be revealed and at this stage itself the disciplinary authority, on receipt of the explanation offered on the part of the delinquent , wouldbe able to tlecide whether really the enquiry has to be carried on against the delinquent on all the charges as framed or delete one or two charges from out of the whole charges framed , so as to make the enquiry a fruitful and purposeful one without allowing the situation for vagueness to prevail at large. In such an exercise, the possibility of the disciplinary authority to arrive at the preliminary satisfaction whether the enquiry same or at least to do away with some of the charges if the enquiry is held . In the case in hand , we are able to see that the Enquiry Officer has been appointed inthe very charge sheet itself thereby denying not only the opportunity for the delinquent to explain the charges but also the a disciplinary authority declining itself to arrive at the preliminary satisfaction whether the enquiry should reallybe held and if it is decided to be whether on all the charges framed or regarding some ofthe same based on the explanation submitted by the delinquent staff. Therefore , in these circumstances , this Court isinperfect agreement the sentiments expressed bytheOrissa High Court in its judgment reported in 1989 Labour and Industrial cases (NOC) 15 thereby holding that in Disciplinary proceedings the enquiry officer cannot be appointed at the time of framing and serving the charges on the delinquent without an opportunity to show -cau which would only show the preconceived mind and ill- intention of the Management and that the act ofthe Management in appointing the Enquiry Officer in the very charge memo , itself is nothing short ofan act ofdenial of opportunity for the writ petitionerto preliminarily explain the charges framed resulting in violation of the high principles of natural justice ."
"On a reading of the aforesaid provision , it is clear that clause 19.1 requires that a person against whom disciplinary action is proposed or likely to be taken , shall in the first instance be informed of all the particulars of the charges against him and he shall have an appropriate opportunity to give his explanation as to such particulars. Final orders shall be passed after due `onsideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances. Undisputedly, the management has not asked the petitioner to submit his explanation for consideration regarding initiation ofa disciplinary proceeding, but the charges were framed on the basis of vigilance enquiry. Enquiring Officer was appointed and the petitioner was asked to submit his explanation to the Enquiring Officer directly. The plea of the management that no explanation was called for before appointing the enquiring Officer , as there was no necessity to do so in view of the Vigilance report, does not appeal to reasons. If a specific procedure is laid down for initiating a disciplinary enquiry , the same has to be scrupulously followed unless there are sufficient reasons to by pass the procedure . Even otherwise , the purpose of initially asking for an explanation is to avoid enquiry, in case the explanation submitted is found satisfactory. The management on consideration of the explanation may decide not to proceed with the process of a disciplinary proceedings if it is satisfied with such explanation of the employee concerned . The eagerness of the opposite parties to expedite the enquiry is not borne out from record and eagerness cannot give sufficient protection or cannot give a right to the opposite parties to obviate and avoid the procedure laid down under theRules or the bipartite agreement "
12.Hence the very initiation of the Disciplinary Pro- ceeding is illegal and invalid being result ofpredetermined mind.
11. Reliance is also placed on in the case of Ballah David A. Vs. Regional Manager Central Bank of India 4412
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
13. The pre -determination of mind of the Disciplin- aryAuthority is also evident from the language used. The language used in the charge sheet is conclusive in nature . The languages concluded that the workman was guilty of the charges levelled against him in the charge sheet. Hence the subsequent enquiry, findings and order based thereon were recluse to mere formality to implement pre- determined to punish the workman. " The case of Surendra Chandra DasVs. State ofWest Bengal ( 1982 Lab . IC . 574) is relied. It has been held in that case:
" It is true that the charges levelled against ade- linquent officer must be clear and unambiguous , but at the same time , the charge- sheet should not be issued with a biased and closed mind. The real purpose of initiating a disciplinary proceeding is to enquiry asto whether the facts , primafacie, ascertained against a delinquent officer are cor- rect or not . Iftherefore from the attending circumstances and also , from the language of the charge- sheet , it appears that the disciplinary au- thority has really drawn a positive conclusion against a delinquent officer and thereafter started a disciplinary proceeding by issuing a charge- shçct only to afford him an opportunity to dispel the conclusion drawn against him , then suchdis- ciplinary proceeding must be held to be bad be- ing vitiatedby bias and a closed mind and having been in all intent and purposes , started to com- pletea formality in law."
14. Ithas been alleged in the charge - shect that there were three complaints dated 29.3.88 , 24.5.88 and 9.6.88 of Shri S.N. Goyal , Shri Rajiv Mehra and Shri Sugan Chand respectively. Shri S.N. Goyal had complained that he had sent his peon to deposit the electricity bill on 14.12.1987. But the MW -3 has stated in his report (M - 19) dated 15.6.88 that the bill was deposited by Shri S. N. Goyal . The Branch Manager who appeared as MW - 1 has stated that nobody made any complaint against Shri O.P. Singh . Shri L.C. Sharma who investigated the matter stated that the com- pounder deposited the bill . Evident from the enquiry that the name of workman was not mentioned in the complaint of29.3.88 of Shri S.N. Goyal . Shri S.N. Goyal the complain- ant did not appear in the enquiry, even MW - 1 did not recognize the signature of the complainant in the so called complaint. It is still strange why the purported complaint was made on 29.3.88 when the alleged incident took place on 14.12.87 . No explanation is forthcoming. MW- 1 the Branch Manager of the Bank particularily stated before the Enquiry Officer, in the enquiry proceedings dated 27.10.88, that" the letter dated 29.3.88 has been addressed to Agent , Central Bank of India , Belangunj Agra regarding non - inti- mation of payment of Rs. 451-50 ofelectricity bill , AESUU Agra by Shri Surendra Nath Goyal , the Ex-Principal Maha- raja Agrasen Inter- College, Agra as printed on his letter head . The signatures are not known to me. " . " This let- ter was not received by me " . " This letter was not handed over to me in particular by the outgoing Branch Manager. " "No person approached me to complain against Shri O.P. Singh".
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 15. The MW-2 has stated in his cross -examination asunder:-
"Q. Who had deposited these bills at the counter ?
A. I deputed one of my staff from the shop to de- positthe said bills to the bank.
Q. Did your man show you duly receipted bills or simply and orally told you that the bills were deposited by him ?
A. My man gave me the receipted bills and told that they have been deposited with the bank.
Q.. Is the person who had deposited these bills with the bank still in service with you ?
A. No, presently he is not serving with us .
Q. Did you not pay attention to the fact that the seal of the bank was undated?
A. No , I never gave my attention to this aspect.
Q. In reply to question No. 4, you have stated that a man from your shop came to the bank and deposited the money at the counter but in your letter dated 24.5.88 i.e. M. Ext- 13 you have written that you deposited the bill which is correct ?
A. My staff whom I deputed to the bank , deposited thebills.
Q. Does it not mean then that you had written wrongly in this letter M. Ex. 13 ?
A. Yes I agree with your contention.
Q. Have you got the original bills of the three bills which you have reportedly deposited with the bank ?
A. I do not have the original receipted bills with me .
Q. Did you ever meet the Branch Manager in this connection ?
A. I never met with the Branch Manager in this con- nection ?"
16. In his cross-examination, MW- 5 , Shri Chaturvedi has stated as following:-
"Q. Do you mean to say that you did not work as ChiefCashierfrom December, 87 to March, 88 ?
A. Yes , as per memory I have not worked as Chief Cashier at Belanganj Agra Branch from Dec, 87 to March , 88.However, I am not recollecting the date by which I have worked as a Currency Chest Officer in the month ofMarch, 1988.
Q. In a report to the bank you have mentioned that you verified the record in connection with working of Mr. O.P. Singh and dates for depositing the Electricity Bills in question, is it correct?
A Before submitting my report to the Bank I have verified the pertaining records of the Electricity Bills .
Q. Was your verification a thorough and deep or you had made a simple verification?
A. I have gone through the records of the bank thor- oughly pertaining to the particular dates for the purpose .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
Q. Then you can tell where Mr. O.P.Singh was work- ing on 21-12-87 ?
A. Mr. O.P. Singh was working on 21-12-87 at the counter of Cash receipt of the Belanganj Agra Branch.
Q. Which cash receipt counter ?
A. I do not know.
Q. You do not know, or you did not check it to find out where or in which counter Mr. O.P. Singh was working on 21-12-87 ?
A. I did not check any record for the working of Mr. O.P. Singh on 21.12.87
Q. Then how did you say that you verified the records indepth?
A. I have only gone through the records of the elec- tricity bills thoroughly.
Q. Please tell where Mr. O.P. Singh was working from 10th March, 88 to 15th March 88 ?
A. I do not know. "
17. Mr. Chaturvadi further stated that " As I am not familiar with the hand writing of Sh . O.P. Singh, I enquired from some of the staff members at the time of my investiga- tion" . In his cross -examination he further stated as under :-
"Q. Please tell us about me conduct and integrity of Shri O.P.Singh during your tenure ?
A. As I am concerned his conduct is good and the integrity is beyond doubt".
18.As regards the complaint of Shri Rajiv Mehra of M/ s . Kedar Nath & Sons that money was deposited on 21-12-87, for payment of electricity bill , who appeared as MW -2 and stated that he had deposited three bills but in his cross -examination he has stated that his staff depos- ited the bills but could not give the name of his staff. The version in the complaint dated 24-5-88 of Shri Rajiv Mehra was that he himself deposited the bills . Further, Shri R.B. Mehrotra who was the Chief Cashier, was present on 21-12-87 in the Branch who was entrusted with thejob of receiving electricity bills . There was no office order as- signing the duty of receiving electricity bills with O.P. Singh for 21-12-87 , which was the practice , in the Order Register ofBelanganj Branch . Moreover the total number of bills received on 21-12-87 were only 37. therefore the workload also did not warrant separate counter for receipt of elec- tricity bills . Therefore the allegation that the workman re- ceivedpayment of electricity bills on 21-12-87 is not proved.
19. Similarly there is no evidence proving the allega- tions contained in the complaint dated 9-6-88 (M- 14) of Shri Sugan Chand. First of all Shri Sugan Chand was not produced in the enquiry as witness . It was alleged in the complaint that Shri Sugan Chand himself came to deposit the electricity bill . But MW-3 , Investigating Officer, has stated that the bill of Shri Sugan Chand was deposited by Satya Typewriter Institute.
20. The Enquiry Officer was pressurized by the higher authorities of the bank which is evident from the enquiry
भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4413 proceedingdated 5-10-88 , 26-10-88 , 16-11-88 , 5-12-88 and 5-1-89. In all these proceedings the enquiry officer has stated that his higher authorities were pressurizing him for early conclusion and they were so anxious to see the con- clusion of the enquiry. This clearly indicates that the en- quiry officer was under pressure form the higher officials ofthe bank management and not acted independently and impartially.
21. The documents such as Exhibits M. Ex -9,12 and 14 were relied on by the enquiry officer without proof of the same. The letter ofExecutive Engineer, UPSEB (Ex-M. Ex.9), complaint of Satish Gupta (M. Ex. 14) and complaint of Surender Nath Goyal (M.Ex. 12) were not proved and in any event cannot be said to have been proved, as the authors of these documents were never produced in the enquiry. Even though these persons were named as wit- nesses in the list of witnesses by the management, they were never produced in the enquiry to prove these docu- ments. But the enquiry officer has rendered findings by relying on these documents also. Hence the findings of the enquiry officer is vitiated on this ground also .
22. The plea of the workman through out was that he never received the payments . He denied the handwriting on the documents . He has been insisting that opinion of the Handwriting Experts be obtained as the documents relied on by the management in the enquiry are not bearing his handwriting and signatures . Even the Appellate Au- thoritydid not consider this material issue . The factum of having deposited the money in respect of the alleged bills in the charge sheet has not been proved . The Manage- ment also failed to prove that the workman was entrusted with the duties of receipt of electricity bills and also that he received the payments . The totality of the evidence do not prove at all the charges levelled in the charge sheet dated 8-8-88 against the workman. Hence I hold that the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer dated 29-6-1989 are perverse . The findings being perverse the punishment order dated 30-9-1989 as well as the order of the Appellate Authority dated 17-5-1990 are also illegal and invalid.
23. The Show-Cause notice dated 23-9-89 was a cryp- tic andunreasoned one. No reasonings have been given in the show cause notice in drawing the conclusion and pro- posing the punishment of dismissal . The very object . of show cause is to give opportunity to the delinquent em- ployee to canvass against the view of the disciplinary au- thority. Since no reasonings were there in the show cause, the workman was deprived of reasonable opportunity to show cause and thereby the principles of natural justice was violated. Merely because giving reasonings in the Finalorder dated 30-9-89 would not cure the fatal infirmity in the show cause notice. Hence the disciplinary proceed- ings is vitiated on this count also.
24. There is no plea in the Written statement of the management seeking permission to lead evidence to prove the charges Under Section 11 -A of I.D. Act . Hence the question giving any opportunity to lead evidence to the management would not arise at all in view of the Judge- . ment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Karnataka 4414
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
AWARD
State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lakshmidevamma , 2001 II LLJ 199 SC
1. Central Government, Ministry of Labour, vide its notification No. L- 12011/73 /2000 IR (B - II) dated 17-7-2000 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal-
25.The next question is the relief. Since the order of punishment of dismissal dated 30-9-1989 and order ofAp- pellate Authority dated 17-5-90 are illegal and invalid, as held above , the workman is entitled to the relief of rein- statement with all consequential benefits with full backwages. The reference is answered accordingly.
Dated: 21-5-03
"Whether the action of Bank of Baroda in transferring Sri R. K. Shukla from Tanda to Bhaskhari is justified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled?
BADRI NIWAS PANDEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई , 2003
का ० आ ० 1720. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ोदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुरके पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
2. In the present case on 5-5-03 when the case was taken up for hearing, and application on behalf of the management has been moved with the prayer that since the grievance of the workman has amicably been settled hence the dispute may be decided accordingly. The management has also filed alongwith its application dated 5-5-03 original letter of the concerned workman writtento hisGeneral Secretary of the Union to which he is a member and which has espoused the present industrial dispute , also indicates that the grievances for which dispute has beenraised stands settled amicably.
[सं ० एल-12011/73/2000- आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ] सी० गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 23rd May, 2003
3. In view of above facts and circumstances of the case it stands clear that there remains no dispute between the parties and the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief in pursuance of the present reference order. Reference is answered accordingly.
SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding Officer नईदिल्ली, 27 मई , 2003
S.O. 1720- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Kanpur (U.P. ) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23-5-03.
[No. L - 12011 /73 /2000-IR (B -II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
का० आ०1721 .- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा ० को० को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण I , धनबाद के पंचाट सदर्भ संख्या 116/1996 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
ANNEXURE
[सं ० एल -20012/392/ 95 - आई० आर० ( सी -1 ) ]
एस० एस ० गुप्ता, अवर सचिव BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT SARVODAYA
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003 NAGAR , KANPUR, 208005
Industrial dispute No. 69 of 2000
In the matter of dispute between-
Bank of Baroda Staff Association UP
S.O.1721 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref No. 116/1996) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
The General secretary BOBSA Madhav Bhawan 15/ 222 -A Civil Lines Kanpur, ( in relation to its workman SriRK Shukla. )
[No. L -20012/392/ 95 - IR (C - 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
AND
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , DHANBAD Bank of Baroda , Regional Manager BOB Regional Office Deokali Road, Reedganj , Lucknow.
Inthe matter of a reference U/S . 10 ( 1 ) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
Reference No. 116 of 1996
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Sudamdih Area of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd.
AND
TheirWorkmen
Present : Shri S.H. Kazmi , PresidingOfficer
APPEARANCES:
For the Employers
4415
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31, 1925
the case that late Bhatu Kole remained absent from work without leave and sufficient cause from 11-12-89 in an unauthorised manner and continued to remain absent .
Shri R. N. Ganguly,
Advocate
:
For the Workmen
Shri S.C. Gour, Advocate. State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated, the 5th May, 2003
AWARD
By Order No. L-20012/392/95 - IR( Coal -I) dated the 22/26th November, 1996 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub - section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
"Whether the demand for employment of Smt . Aghani Devi under clause 9.4.2 of NCWA in place of her husband Late Bhatu Kole by the union is legal and justified? If so, to what relief is Smt. Aghani Devi entitled? "
2. Precisely, the case of the sponsoring union is that Bhatu Kole, who was a permanent workman of Sudamdih Shaft Mine , died on 2-11-92 while in service whereafter his wife , Aghani Devi filed all the papers for self -employment to the management on 18-4-94 in terms of the provisions of NCWA regarding employment to the dependant of a deceased workman . It has been said that the dependant wife of the deceased requested the management time and again for employment but the management adopted dilly dallying tactice and finally by letter dated 9-11-94 the employment was regretted on the ground of socalled dismissal of the deceased workman from service w.e.f. 10/ 13-1-94 . Further it has been said that the concerned workman died on 2-11-92 and as per the management's version he was dismissed from service in the month of January, 1994 and as such denying employment on the ground of dismissal is baseless , false and motivated. It has also been said that being a Tribal lady, the widow of late Bhatu Kole could not get death certificate from the concerned department soon , but she informed the management about the death of her husband just after death in 1992 and again confirmed on 6-1-1994 inwriting. Prayer has been made for an award holding the demand for employment of Aghani Devi under 9.4.2 of NCWA in place of her deceased husband legal and justified and also for passing necessary direction in that regard.
3. The management in its written statement a part from raising certain grounds with respect to the maintainability of the instant reference has come out with 1590 G1/03-19
It has been said that after waiting for him for more than two years a chargesheet for long absenteeism was issued to him vide chargesheet dated 27-1-92 but no reply was received from him. Further it has been said that one Aghani Devi claiming herself to be the wife of Bhatu Kole informed vide her letter dated 21-3-92 that her husband Bhatu Kole was absenting since last three years from home as he was suffering frus mental disease . Since the said letter of Aghani Devi was not supplied by any proof or certificate the management vide its letter dated 8-6-92 informed her about the unauthorised absence of Bhatu Kole leading to issue of the chargesheet and she was asked to submit necessary proof in support of her contention but no reply was received from her. Further the case is that notices of enquiry were sent on the home address ofBhatu Kole but he did not attend the domestic enquiry, and hence ex - parte hearing had to be conducted observing the principle of natural justice and in that enquiry finally Bhatu Kole was found guilty of the charges and thereafter on the basis ofthe report submitted he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 10-1-94. the dismissal letter dated 10/ 13-1-94 was sent on his home address by registered post . It has been said that subsequently after the dismissal of Bhatu Kole . Aghani Devi informed the management that her husband died on 2-11-92 and produced death certificate dated 20-1-94 in support of the said fact . However, the said certificate was not considered genuine on the face of it as the certificate was obtained on 20-1-94 i.e. after Bhatu Kole was dismissed from service. Moreover, nothing prevented Aghani Devi from informing the management immediately after 2-11-92 . It is said that the date of registration has been mentioned as 7-1-93 on the purported certificate . This , according to the management, clearly shows that the aforesaid paper hasbeen manufactured and fabricated with ulterior motive tograb employment illegally. It is also said that Bhatu Kole did not die while in service as he had left employment on his own on 11-12-89 and hence clause 9.4.2 of NCWA is not attracted .
In its rejoinder the management has denied or controverted several statements made in the workman's written statement and reiterated its stand already taken in itswritten statement.
Inthe rejoinder filed on behalf of the workman also several demands made in the management's written statement has been denied and it has been emphatically asserted once again that Bhatu Kole died while in service so her wife is fully entitled for employment as per the provisions contained in NCWA .
4. In view of the stands taken on behalf of the respective sides , as noticed above , it has to be seen as to how far the management was justified in denying the claim of the dependant wife of the deceased workman for her employment .
4416
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
involved , for which there is no explanation , cannot be ignored.
5. In support of their respective stands both sides have adduced oral as well as documentary evidence which would be looked into and considered in course of discussions made hereinafter.
The management's firm stand on the basis of several ocuments filed on its behalf (Exts. M- 2 to M-4) is that whenthe workman started absenting from 1989 a charge- sheet dated 27-1-92 was issued to him but no reply was made. However , in the meantime a letter was received from his wife that her husband who was suffering from mental illness was traceless since long. She was asked to submit documents in support of the said fact but she failed to act accordingly. Further , as per the management the enquiry was held ex -parte against the workman and upon completion ofthe same the report was submitted and then on the basis of that report the concerned workman was dismissed from service vide letter dated 10/ 13-1-94 (Ext.M-4). The argument of the management is that after the dismissal of the the workman from service no question arises ofproviding employment to the concerned lady under clause 9.4.2 of NCWA and the workman cannot be taken tohave died during his service tenure if at all he was dead.
Argument onbehalf of the workman is that no enquiry was held and the documents of enquiry are forged, fabricated and manufactured . It is true that photo copies of the documents relating to the enquiry proceeding have been filed and not the originals but in view of the circumstances involved and also in view of the fact that themanagement's witness has stated about the said fact in details, it is difficult to accept the contentions advanced on behalf of the workman that, infact, no domestic enquiry was ever held and all thosedocuments have just been manufactured for the purpose of the present case , it is hard tobelieve or conceive that despite absenting from duty for years together or from the year 1989 itself the management would have sat tight over the matter and would not have taken any action in the shape of issuance of chargesheet or the initiation of the departmental proceeding.
7. Despite all the above , there is yet another glaring aspect that requires consideration before coming to the final conclusion with respectto the demand raised in the instant case .
Admittedllythe concerned lady sent a letter on 5-1-94 (Ext. W- 3) to the management in which she furnished information regarding the death of her husband. Till then, admittedly there was no order passed regarding dismissal ofthe deceased workman from service and the same was passed only on 10-1-94. Letter dated 10/ 13-1-94 issued in that regard is marked Ext. M-4 that means at the time of passing of the said order the management was well informed about the death of the workman. It is not the case of the management that the said letter of the lady was received only after the passing of the order of dismissal or after issuance of the letter in that regard . If the fact regarding the death of the deceased workman was correct then the management was going to pass an order against a dead person. The question is why it was not considered necessary by the managementto ascertain about the death of the deceased workman and asking his wife who had 6. As per the case of the management the concerned workman, Bhatu Kole, was absenting from duty since 11-12-89 . The wife of the deceased ( WW- 2) has admitted the said fact during her evidence . It is also admitted fact that vide her letter dated 21-3-92 Aghani Devi , wife ofthe deceased workman informed the management for the first time that her husband , who had been suffering from mental illness , had left the house and was traceless since last three years . After the receipt of such letter which was not supported by any document in proof of the said fact, according to the management , it had sent a letter dated 8-6-92 (Ext . M- 1 ) to the said lady for submitting necessary proof in support of her contention but no reply was received from her . The fact as regards the receipt of any such letter has not been denied either in the rejoinder filed to the written statement of the management or during evidence . It has also not been stated anywhere as to why no reply was made or no action was taken as per the requirements indicated in the said letter. It is also significant to indicate that neither there is any statement to the effect as to why the said information was sent for the first time only in the year 1992 when her husband was absenting from duty from the year 1989 itself and why after sending the said letter in 1992 no effort was made till 1994 for ascertaining about the developments from the management in respect of the concerned workman and further if the workman died in the year 1992 itselfthen why no information was sent immediately to the management and why the wife of the deceased waited for sending a letter in that regard and that too without any supporting papers , such as, death certificate. Certain other curious aspects are also there for which there is absolutely no explanation comingforth . For instance, from death certificate (Ext. W- 1 ) it appears that death was registered on 7-1-93 but the date of obtaining or issuance of such certificate is mentioned as 20-1-94 . If the death was registered in the month of January, 1993 itself then why the certificate was obtained so belatedly and why the same was not considered necessary to be produced in the year 1993 itself, there is no reply to the said effect. Further, in the application dated 5-1-94 (Ext . W-3) there is no mention about any step being taken for obtaining death certificate whereas as per the death certificate the step was taken in the year 1993 itself and in the same year the death was registered also . Again there is no explanation to this effect. The argument on behalf of the workman is that being a rustic and illiterate the concerned lady could not take the steps in time and was not knowing about the consequences . Thisdoes not appear to be convencing . The lady who can send the letters to the management in the year 1992 and also a letter in the year 1994 and who can also apply for death certificate of her husband cannot be taken to have been completely ignorant about the steps required to be taken by her . So , mere on the pretext of her illiteracy all those curious aspects [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4417
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
award . In case upon enquiry, the fact regarding the death or genuineness of the death certificate stands established then in that event the management would be required to provide employment to the said lady, subject to her suitability and physical fitness , within a reasonable period.
However, there would be no order as to cost . S. H. KAZMI , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
का. आ. 1722.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयर इंडिया लि. , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II मुम्बई के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 15/2000 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/63/99- आई. आर. ( सी -1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th May , 2003 furnished information in that regard to submit documents inproof of the said fact . Why the management was in such a hurry and why it had chosen to proceed in the matter hurriedly, there is no explanation worthmentioning to that effect .Even after the passing of the dismissal order, when the death certificate was produced by the lady alongwith her application for employment the management could have held the enquiry at its own level to ascertain the genuineness of the same and to find out as to how far the fact regarding death of the deceased workman was correct. After the enquiry the management could have proceeded accordingly and either on the basis of findings it could have rejected the claim of the lady or could have provided employment to her as per her request in terms ofthe relevant provisions of NCWA . No one was suggesting that the management should concede the demand even if it is found that the workman died not on the date as alleged and not during his service tenure . As such, the manner in which the management proceeded after the receipt of the letter from the concerned lady in the year 1994 regarding the death of her husband, atleast cannot be justified and certainly it did not serve the ends of justice . The requirement from the management was just to go into the truth and then to do justice in the matter leaving aside all the aforesaid developments and keeping in view this fact also that the claimant was a poor, rustic and illiterate lady.
S.O.1722 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-5-2003.
[No. L- 11012/63/99 - IR (C- 1 )] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
I am of the considered view that the rejection of the claimby the management without ascertaining or verifying the fact regarding the death of the deceased workman or about the genuineness of the death certificate produced , cannotbe held to be just , proper and valid on its part and in that view the concerned lady certainly deserves some appropriate relief. I am also of the view that the demand raised by the union cannot streightaway be held to be justified in the circumstances ofthis case without granting opportunity to the management to hold enquiry to the aforesaid effect .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. II MUMBAI
PRESENT S. N. SAUNDANKAR PRESIDING OFFIDER
REFERENCE NO . CGIT -2/ 15 OF 2000
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
Ends of justifice would be met if the management, for its own satisfaction and also in view of certain curious aspects, as noticed above , holds an enquiry at its own level to ascertain the genuineness of the death certificate and about the death of the deceased workman on the date as alleged . In the event of finding the said fact to be true it wouldbe in the fitness of things and would be appropriate for the management to provide employment to the said lady in place of her deceased husband of course subject to her suitability for employment and physical fitness.
8. The award is, thus , made as hereunder:
M/s . AIR INDIA LIMITED TheManaging Director, AirIndia Limited, AirIndia Building, NarimanPoint, Mumbai -400021 . AND
TheirWorkmen
Mrs. Sanjana Singh , 7 A/133 , CGS Quarters, AntopHill, Mumbai -400037,
In the circumstances of this case the demand raised by the union for employment of Aghani Devi under clause 9.4.2 of NCWA can be taken to be justified only upon the ascertainment and verification of the fact by the management regarding the death ofthe concerned workman as alleged and genuineness of the death certificate produced. Consequently, the management is hereby directed to hold the enquiry at its own level to the said effect within sixty days from the date of publication of this [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
4418
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई , 2003
APPEARANCES:
Forthe Employer
: Mr. L. L. D'Souza, Representative
For the workman
:Mr. Mohan Bir Singh, Advocate
Mumbai , dated 1st May, 2003
AWARD PART-II
का. आ. 1723.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा ० को० को० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 167/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/94/96- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May , 2003 By the Interim Award dated. 5th December, 2002 this Tribunal held that the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman Ms. Sanjana Singh was not as per the Principles of Natural Justice and the findings of the inquiry committee are perverse . Consequently management was directed to Icad evidence to justify its action of dismissal ofsaid workman
S.O.1723 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref No. 167/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-5-2003.
2. When the matter was fixed for leading evidence by the management the workman vide purshis (Exhibit -64) pointed out that she has been reinstated in service from 28-4-2003 therefore she does not wish to prosecute the reference which was not objected by the management . Hence the order : --
[No. L - 20012/94/ 96 - IR (C - 1 ) ] ORDER
S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
Reference stands disposed of for non -prosecution vide purshis (Exhibit -64) .
S. N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. II , AT DHANBAD EXNO . 64
PRESENT:
SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURTNO.2
In the matter of a reference Industrial Dispute under on Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
IN THE MATTER OF REFERENCE NO . L.C. 2/15 OF 2000
REFERENCE NO. 167 OF 1998 Workman
Sanjana Jaikaran Singh
V/s
PARTIES:Employers in relation to the management of Maheshpur Colliery of M/ s . B, C.C . Ltd. and theirWorkmen.
Air India Limited
Employer
APPEARANCES :
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR
Onbehalf ofthe workman : Shri K. Chakravorty, Advocate .
The workman abovenamed begs to submit as follows:
Onbehalfof the employers : Shri B.M. Prasad, Advocate
Industry: Coal
State: Jharkhand
Dated, Dhanbad, the 9th May, 2003
AWARD
The Governemnt of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L. 20012/94/96- IR ( Coal - I) , dated the 29th June , 1998 .
SCHEDULE
1. That pursuant to the directions of the Hon'ble High Court ofBombay, the departmental appeal. filed by the workman was heard by the Managing Director of Air India Ltd. and he has passed an order dated 1/5 April , 2003 reinstating the workman in the service as an airhostess on the condition that the pending litigation be withdrawn/concluded on that basis. The petitioner has resumed services with effect from 28-4-2003 and as such is not interested in pursuing the matter any further before this Hon'ble court . The workman accordingly prays that the present reference may be disposed of as not pressed further .
Dated this 30th day of April , 2003 .
"Whether the action of the management of Maheshpur Colliery of M/s . BCCL in superannuating ShriMantu Gope is justified ? If not, what relief is the workman entitled ?"
Sd/- Workman
Sd/- Advocate for the Workman 4419 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2. The case of the concerned workman according to W.S. submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is as follows:-
notice of superannuation issued to him vide order of 25/ 26-2-94. They submitted that as per provision of the certified standing his age recorded in the Form B Register becomes conclusive evidence for deciding the time of superannuation and accordingly the concerned workman was legally superannuated from his service with effect from 29-7-94 on attaining his age of 60 years . They submitted that it was the responsibility of the concerned workman to producedocumentary evidence or any other record in proof ofhis age .As he failed to produce any evidence indicating his date of birth as per the company's procedure , his age was assessed by the Special Medical Board and the same was entered in the Form B Register . They submitted that there was no ground for the concerned workman to raise dispute on the issue of his superannuation from his service. Accordingly, they submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman.
4. The Points to be decided in this reference are :-
"Whether the action of the management of Maheshpur Colliery of M/s. BCCL in superannuating Shri Mantu Gope is justified? If not, what relief is the workman entitled?"
FINDING WITH REASONS
5. It transpires from the record that the concerned workman in order to substantiate his claim neither adduced anyevidence nor relied on any documents . The management also declined to adduce any evidence . Therefore , relying on the facts disclosed in the pleading of respective side let me consider how far the claim of the concerned workman stands oncogent footing and if the claim of the concerned workman stands on cogent footing whether he deserves to get any award in support ofhis claim or not .
The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was a permanent night guard at Maheshpur Colliery since 28-1-73 they submitted that due to inadvertance mistake correct age ofthe concerned workman was not recorded and for which he submitted representation before the management for determination of his age by Medical Board by conducting ossification test as per medical jurisprudence . they alleged that the company's medical board determined the age of the concerned workman illegally and arbitrarily and in utter violation of the medical jurisprudence . They alleged that the Medical Board assessed his age as 54 years as on 29-7-88 without conducting any ossification test and for which he raised his strong objection . They alleged that as a result of assessment of the age of the concerned workman by the MedicalBoard without ossification test the difference of age between him and his father was only for four years . They disclosed that Sri Panchanan Gope the father of the concerned workman was a permanent workman of Bhagaband Colliery who retired from his service on 28-4-90 at the age of 60 years by order of 29-10-89 . They submitted that when this matter was brought to the notice ofthe management they issued an orderdt . 29-4-91 directing himto appear before Apex Medical Board and in compliance to that direction when he appeared before Apex Medical Board for the medical test in the matter of determination of his age the said board curiously did not determine his age for the reasons best known to them. On the contrary management superannuated him from his service prematurely. As a result they raised an industrial dispute before ALC ( C) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The sponsoring union on behalf of the concerned workman submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman to his service with full back wages either recording his age as 44 years as on 29-7-94 or to determine his age through Medical Board by conducting ossification test and test prescribed under medical jurisprudence.
6. Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings ofboth sides I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workmanwas a permanent employee under the management since 28-1-73 . It is also admitted fact that at the time of his entry in the service his age/date ofbirth was not recorded in the statutory Form B register. The contention of the concerned workman is that on 29-7-88 under direction of the management the Medical Board assessed his age as 54 years without holding any ossification test and accordingly he raised protest and the management appreciating his protest issued an order dt . 29-4-91 directing him to appear before Apex Medical Board at Koyala Bhawan for his re- medical examination. He submitted that in response to that order he appeared before the Apex Medical Board but the said Board did not determine his age . He alleged that on the basis of illegal and arbitrary decision of the Special Medical Board his age was recorded as 54 years as on 29-7-88 in the Form B register and on the basis of wrong and arbitarary assessment of age the management superannuated him from service with effect from 29-7-94 . Hesubmitted that on 29-7-94 his actual age was 44 years . He further disclosed that his father Panchanan Gope was a permanent workman of Bhagaband colliery under the management who retired from his service on 28-4-90 at the age of 60 years as on that date by order of the management 3. The management on the contrary after filing W.S. cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in their W.S. They submitted that date ofbirth of the concerned workman had not been recorded in the statutory Form B Register as he could not declare his age and also could not produce any documentary evidence in support ofhis age. Accordingly, he was sent to Special Medical Board for assessment of his age and as per the age assessed by the Special Medical Board on 29-7-88 his age was recorded as 54 years in the FormB Register. They submitted that at that time when age of the concerned workman was assessed by the Special Medical Board as 54 years as on 29-7-88, he did not raise any objection. Even he did not raise any dispute till he was superannuated with effect from 29-7-94 on the basis of 4420
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
dt . 29-10-89 . Disclosing this fact he submitted that if the decision of the Special Medical Board in relation to dctermination of his age is taken into consideration in that case it should presumed that the difference of age between him and his father will be only four years .
7. Management on the contrary submitted that at the time of his entry in the service as the concerned workman failed to disclose his age and also as he failed to submit any documentary evidence in support of his date of birth his age column of the Form B register left blank . Thereafter on 29-7-88 the concerned workman was sent before Special Medical Board for determination ofhis age and as per the age assessed by the Special Medical Board his age was recorded as 54 years as on 29-7-88 , and the said age was duly recorded in the Form B Register . Management further submitted that the concerned workman did not raise any protest in the matter of assessment of his age till he was superannuated from service with effect from 29-7-94 on the basis of notice of superannuation dt . 25/26-2-94 . They also categorically denied the fact that Panchanan Gope was the father ofthe concerned workman and the difference of age between him and his father was only four years . They also denied the fact that in view of protest lodged by the concerned workman he was asked to appear before the Apex Medical Board for redetermination of his age by office order dt. 29-4-91 . The specific claim of the management is that the concemed workman with a view to harrass them has raised this frivolous dispute after he was superannuated from his service.
8. It is seen that the concerned workman in course ofhearing has failed to produce any authentic evidence to show that he raised his protest in the manner and way his age was determined by the Special Medical Board . Considering the reference in question I find no dispute to hold that the instant Industrial dispute was raised by the concerned workman after he was superannuated from his service on 29-7-94 , as his age was determined by the Special Medical Board in the year 1988. He was superannuated from his service on 29-7-94 . The concerned workman had enough scope to establish that he not only raised protest but also submitted representation in the matter of determination of his age by the Special Medical Board. The concerned workman also has failed to produce the office orderdt . 29-4-91 through which the management asked hirn to appear before Apex Medical Board for redetermination of his age . He disclosed that one Panchanan Gope was his father who was a permanent employee at Bhagaband Colliery and who retired from his service on 28-4-90 at the age of 60 years. He submitted that difference of age between him and his father was only 4 ycars . Management categorically denied the fact that Panchanan Gope was the father of the concerned workman. When such protest was raised on the part of the manageinent . Onus rested on the workman to establish that Panchanan Gope was his father. It is seen that inspite ofgetting ample opportunites the concerned workman did
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] not consider necessary to produce a single scrap of paper to establish this fact . Even he had the scope to examine Panchanan Gope as witness to substantiate the claim in question but he did not consider necessary to do so.
9. The concerned workman in his W.S. categorically submitted that he was only 44 years old as on 29-7-94 but to substantiate this claim he did not consider necessary to produce a single scrap of paper .
10. The dispute relating to his age assessed by the Special Medical Board has been raised by the concerned workman. Accordingly onus on him to establish that the Special Medical Board has illegally and arbitrarily assessed his age . If any such dispute crops up protest should be raised at the initial stage to get redress of the same . I have already discussed above that the concerned workman has failed to produce any cogent evidence to establish that he raised his protest immediately after determination of his age illegally and arbitrarily by the Special Medical Board . No satisfactory explanation is forthcoming why he raised this industrial dispute after his superannuation from his service. He had the scope to raise Industrial dispute immediatly after arbitrary assessment of his age but he did not do so. It is mandatory provision of law that at the time ofentry in the service age of the workman is to be recorded in the statutory Form B register on the basis of relevant certificate of ages to be produced by the workman . When no such document in proof of age has been produced by the workman he is sent to the Medical Board for assessment ofhis age and the age which is determined by the board is recorded in the statutory register . It is seen that as the concerned workman had failed to produce any document inproof of his age he was sent to Special Medical Board fordetermination of his age and the said board assessed the age as 54 years as on 29-7-88 . It is seen that the concerned workman has failed to substantiate his claim that he raised this dispute immediately thereafter. Facts disclosed in the pleading cannot be considered as substantive piece of evidence until and unless it is substantiated by cogent evidence . It is seen that the workman in spite of getting ample opportunities has failed to produce any cogent evidence to substantiate his claim in question . Accordingly, at this belated stage after his superannuation from his service such dispute cannot be sustainable and for which he is not entitled to get any relief. In the result, the following award is rendered: - " The action of the management of Maheshpur Colliery ofM/s . BCCL in superannuating Shri Mantu Gope is justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
का० आ० 1724.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4421
in service at Gopinathpur Colliery under para 9.3.2 of NCWA - U is justified ? It not to what relief is the concerned workman is entitled ? " निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. 20012/55/98- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1724. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 82/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
[No. L-20012/55/98 - IR(C - 1)]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I. D. Act . , 1947
REFERENCE No. 82 of 1999
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of M/ s. ECL and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
: None
Onbehalf of the workman
Onbehalf of the employers : None
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal.
Dated, Dhanbad, the 9th May, 2003
ORDER
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . The management also did not apear in this reference. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 12-2-99 and since then it is pending for disposal . Registered notices were also issued to the workman as well as to the management but none of them turned up. In terms of Rule 10B of the I. D. Central Rules , 1957 submission of W.S. by the concerned workman within 15 days is a mandatory one . The concerned workman not only violated the said provision of the Rules but also did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . ,Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002(94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute, Award when both the parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit inabsence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the parties in spite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting anyjustice . Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation on both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the parties but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/55/98 - IR (C- I) , dated, the 29th January, 1999 .
SCHEDULE
In view of the facts and circumstances , I do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to disposeof the ref in question on merit, the same is closed.
"Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Colliery under Mugma Area of ECL in denying employment to Smt . Abala Modian , dependentwife of late Aklu Modi , who diedwhile
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 4422
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
"Whether the action of the management of Jitpur Colliery of IISCO in dismissing Sri Sufal Bauri and Shri Kaushal Kishor Singh, from the services of the company on the ground of long unauthorised absence is justified? It not to what relief the workman is entitled ? "
का० आ ० 1725.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्कोके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 198/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-20012/673/97-आई-आर-( सी-1 ) ]
1 एस ० एस ० गुप्ता , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1725. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 198/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IISCO and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003.
[No. L- 20012/ 673/97- IR( C- 1 )]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section
10(1)(d) of the I. D. Act . , 1947
REFERENCE No. 198 of 2001
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of JitpurColliery of M/ s . IISCO . Ltd. and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
None
Onbehalf ofthe workman :
Onbehalf of the employers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal .
Dhanbad, the 9th May, 2003
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, the management side though appeared before this Tribunal did not file authorisation and W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 8-8-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workmen failed to appear registered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of the issuance ofnotices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issue by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/ union. Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002(94 ) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass 'No dispute ' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference onmerit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice. Until and unlesss the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation ofboth sides. Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/ union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing ofthe case for disposal on merit .
ORDER
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers confcrred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/673/ 97 - IR( C- I ) , dated, the 25th July, 2001.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4423
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
Maksood Mian, Ramadhar, Anil Kr. Mandal and Ram Janam in time rated job is justified? If not, to what relief are the concerned workmen entitled? "
का० आ०1726.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 35/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/16/96- आई.आर. ( सी -1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1726. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Govern- ment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 35/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Cen- tral Government on 23-05-2003.
[No. L-20012/16/96- IR( C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I. D. Act . , 1997
REFERENCE No. 35 of 1997
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/ s . BCCL and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
: None
Onbehalf ofthe workman
Onbehalf of the employers : Shri D. K: Verma, Advocate .
State: Jharkhand
Industry:Coal.
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However , the managc- ment side though appeared before this Tribunal did not file W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 9-4-97 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed te appear, registered notices and show cause notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of the issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issue by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/ union . Naturally respon- sibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit. In view ofthe decision reported in 2002 ( 94 ) FLR 624 it will not bejust and proper to pass ' No dispute' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not con- sider even to file W.S/documents such expectation to dis- pose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their work- men. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Untill and unless the attitude ofthe union is changed 1 consider that this uncalled for situation will persist. Defi- nitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportu- nities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result. This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Dhanbad, the 2ndMay, 2003 ORDER
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period . Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their No. L- 20012/16/96- IR (C-I) , dated, the 1st April , 1997.
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई , 2003
SCHEDULE
"Whether be action of the management of M/ s . Charat Coking Coal Linated in denial to regularise S/Sh. Ali Mohammad, Shiv Nandan Yadav, Ramadhar Mahato ,
का० आ० 1727.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में 1590 G1 /03-20 4424
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
dependent son of late Lobin Manjhi , Ex - Miner/Loader of Tetulmari ofM/s . B. C. C. L is entitled? "
निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती हैं, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/244-A/96- आई.आर. (सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1727. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 78/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - II Dhanbad. now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
[No.L-20012/244-A/ 96- IR(C - 1 ) ]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) , AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
ShriB. Biswas, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section
10( 1) (d) of the 1. D. Act . , 1997
REFERENCE No. 78 of 1998
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Tetulmari Colliery of M/s . BCCL and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Shri H. Nath ,
Onbehalf of the employers :
Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal .
Dated, Dhanbad, the 2nd May, 2003
ORDER
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, the manage- ment side appeared and filed their W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tri- bunal on 7-4-98 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear , registered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tri- bunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basisof dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned work- man/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass 'No dispute' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute tohold that when any reference is made it is expected tobe disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S/documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of regis- tered notices, As per I.D. Act the workman excepting un- der provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen . These unions inspite of receiv- ing notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman. and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Untill and unless the atti- tude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist. Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides. Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/ union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit.
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 200 12/244- A/96- IR( C - I ) , dated, the 18th March, 1998.
SCHEDULE
B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer .
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
का० आ० 1728.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रदीप हार्ड कोक इंडस्ट्रीज के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक "Whether the action of the Management of Tetulmari Colliery of M/s . Bharat Coking Coal Limited in not provid- ing the employment to Sh . Ravan Manjhi , the dependent son oflate Lobin Manjhi , Ex-M/Loader of Tetulmari Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL under the provision of 9.4.2 of N. C. W. A.- IV only on the account/ground of delayed one is not seems to bejustified ? If not, to what relief Sh. Ravan Manjhi , the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4425 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
अधिकरण- II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 241/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकर को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/22/99- आई.आर ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1728. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 241/99) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Pradip Hard Coke Industries and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
[No. L-20012 /22/99 - IR(C - 1 ) ]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) ofthe I. D. Act. , 1997
REFERENCE No. 241 of 1999
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Pradip Hard Coke Industries and their workman.
APPEARANCES:
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the employers : None
State : Jharkhand
Industry: HardCoke.
Dated, Dhanbad, the 2nd May, 2003
ORDER
to the workman as well as to the management but none of them turned up . In terms of Rule 10B of the I.D. Central Rules , 1957 submission of W.S. by the concerned workman within 15 days is a mandatory one . The concerned workman not only violated the said provision of the Rules but also did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman /union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass 'No dispute' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S. such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the parties inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred fron raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are main raised by the union for their workmen . These unions i spite of receiving notices do not care to appear before th Court for the interest of the workman and as a result the havebeen deprived of getting any justice. Untill and unle the attitude of the union is changed I consider that th uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the du of the Courtto dispose of the reference on merit but :: depends on the cooperation on both sides . Here reco: will clearly expose that sufficient opportunitics had been given to the parties but yielded no result. This attitud shows clearly that the Parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Inview of the facts and circumstances , 1 do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
TheGovt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d ) of , the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide Ministry's Order No. L-20012/22/99 - IR(C -I) , dated, the 4th June, 1999 .
B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer.
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
" KYA PRADIP COKE AND STEEL KEY PRAVANDTANTRA DWARA DINAK 30-3-97
का० आ० 1729.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 SEY SMATI JYOTI KI BARKHASTGI BIDHIBAT EVAM NYAYOCHIT HAI ? YADI NAHI TO KARMKAR KIS RAHAT KEY PATRA HAI ? "
का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकर को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.-20012/276/99- आई. आर. ( सी -1 ) ] 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . The nagement also did not appear in this Reference . It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 22-8-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . Registered notices were also issued
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव 4426
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1729. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofBCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
1 [No. L- 20012/276/ 99 - IR( C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section
10(1)(d) ofthe I. D. Act, 1997
REFERENCE No. 12 of2000
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Moonidih Area of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
On behalf of the employers : Shri R. N. Ganguly, Advocate .
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal.
Dhanbad, the 2nd May, 2003
the notices issues by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned work- man/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the con- cerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit. In view of the decision reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not bejust and proper to pass ' No dispute' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the partiesdo not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S/documents such expectation to dispose of the refer- ence on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo motu to the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the work- man excepting under provisions of Section 2 A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen. These unions in spite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Until and un- less the attitude of the union is changed I consider that thisuncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the dutyofthe Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/ union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
ORDER
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period.Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.
The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/276/99 ( C- I ) , dated, the 21st January, 2000.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
SCHEDULE
का० आ० 1730.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 "Whether the action of the Management of B. C. C. L. Moonidih Project in denying employment to Manju Devi wife oflate Rishi Nath Mahato, workmen, who died while in employment isjustified? If not , to what relief is Smt . Manju Devi entitled? "
का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकर को23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/489/95- आई.आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However , the manage- ment side though appeared filed only authorisation. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was re- ceived by this Tribunal on 31-1-2000 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear , registered notices were issued to the workman side but in spite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to
S.O. 1730. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Gov- ernment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II Dhanbad now 4427 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employer in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Cen- tral Government on 23-05-2003 .
[No. L-20012/489/95 -IR(C- 1 ) ]
S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer
In the matter of an Industrial dispute under Section
10(1) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE No. 11 of 1997
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Koyla Bhawan of M/s . BCC Ltd. and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the employers : Shri D.K. Verma,
Advocate.
to pass ' No dispute' Award when both parties remain ab- sent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S/documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo motu with the expectations for appearance of the work- man inspite of issuance of registered notices , As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute per- sonally. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen . These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice. Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situa- tion will persist . Definitely is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/ union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit.
Dated, Dhanbad, the 5th May, 2003
ORDER
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an in- definite period . Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
TheGovt . of India, Minsistry ofLabour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( I ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 200 12/489/95 - IR(C - I ) , dated, the 10th January, 1997.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of B.C.C.Ltd. in removing Shri S.L. Sharma from the services is legal and justified? It not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
का० आ० 1731.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा . को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 115/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकर को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल . 20012/517/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1731.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 115/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment ofBCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
[No. L-20012/517/2000 - IR(C - 1 ) ] 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, the manage- ment side though appeared before this Tribunal and filed authorisation did not file W.S. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 31-1-1997 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear , registered no- tices and show cause notices were issued to the con- cerned workman but inspite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise is what will be the fate of the refer- ence made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/ union to assist the Court to dispose ofthe reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision reported in 2002 ( 94 ) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper
S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy 4428
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section
10( 1) ( d) of the I. D. Act , 1947
REFERENCE No. 115 of 2001
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of M/ s. B.C.CL. and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
None
Onbehalf of the workman :
On behalf of the management : Authorised Representa tive
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal.
Dated, Dhanbad , the 5th May, 2003
ORDER
to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit. In view of the decision reported in 2002 (94 ) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute' Award whenboth the parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on marit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of onmerit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the parties inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen . These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting anyjustice . Untill and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist. Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation on both sides . Here record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the parties but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Inview of the facts and circumstances , I do not find any sufficient reason to drage on the case for an indefinite period . Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
The Govt. of India , Minsistry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide there Order No. L -20012/517/ 2000- ( C - I) , dated, the 29th March , 2001.
SCHEDULE
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
"Whether the action of the Management of M/s . B. C. C.L. in denyirıg promotion as Dumper Operator (Excavation Grade ' E ' w.e.f. 18-1-97 and Grade ' B' w.c.f. 15-4-2000) to the workmen Sri Jagdish Nonia presently working as Dumper Op- crator in Grade ' C ' in Ghanoodih Collieryjusti- fied, legal and proper ? It not, to what relief is the workman entitled? "
का० आ ० 1732.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कृष्णा हार्ड कोक इंडस्ट्रीज के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकर को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. 20012/343/95- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
(
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1732. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 4/97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Krishna Hard Coke Industries and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . The management side appeared and filed there W.S. in this case. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 23-4-2001 and since then it is pending for disposal . Registered notices were also issued to the workman but they failed to appear before this Tribunal . In terms ofRule 10B ofthe 1.D. Central Rules , 1957 submission of W.S. by the concerned workman within 15 days is a mandatory one . The concerned workman not only violated the said provision of the Rules but also did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate of the refcrence made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis ofdispute raised by the concerned workman/ union . Natu- rally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/ union
[No. L -20012/343/ 95 - IR( C- I )] S. K. GUPTA , Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under section 10(1)( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE No.4 of 1997
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Krishnan Hard Coke Industries , and their work- man .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the employers : None
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal .
Dated, Dhanbad, the 5th May, 2003
ORDER
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/343/ 95 - IR ( C- I ) , dated, the 3rd January, 1997 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of SriKrishnan Hard Coke Industries in terminating Sh . Bodi Lal Majhi from service w.e.f. 1-1-92 is justified? It not to what relief the concerned work- man is entitled?" .
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . However , the management side though appeared on one occasion failed to appear subsequently inspite of issuance of notices . It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 31-1-1997 and since then it is pending for disposal . Registered notices and show cause notices were issued to the workman but inspite of issuance ofnotices they failed to turn up. In terms of Rule 10B of the I.D. Central Rules , 1957 submission ofW.S. by the concerned workmanwithin 15 days is a mandatory one . The concerned workman not only violated the said provision of the Rules but also did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is inade on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the conce: med workman/union and the management to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit . In
4429
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
view ofthe decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002(94) FLR 624 it will not bejust and proper to pass 'No dispute' Award when both the parties remain absent . There isalso no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected tobe disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S. such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance for the workman and the management inspite of issuance ofregistered notices. As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen . These unions inspite of receiving notices did not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting anyjustice . Untill and unless the attitude ofthe union is changed. I consider that this uncalled for situationwill persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Courtto dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperationofboth sides. Here the record will clearly expose thatsufficient opportunities had been given to the workman of the union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit , the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
का० आ० 1733.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्धनियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मेंकेन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 66/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-05-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. 20012/21/97- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1733.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of TISCO and their workman , which was received by the Cen- tralGovernment on 23-05-2003.
[No. L-20012/21/97 - IR(C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
4430
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. Biswas ,
PresidingOfficer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under section
10(1)(d) of the 1. D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE No. 66 of 1998
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . TISCO and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
None
Onbehalf of the workman :
Sri D.K. Verma,
Onbehalf of the employers :
Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal.
Dated , Dhanbad, the 5th May, 2003
ORDER
absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available docu- ments . There is no dispute to hold that when any refer- ence is made it is expected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S./documents such expectation to dis- pose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the Court will persue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices , As per I.D. Act the workman personally excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainly raised by the union for their workmen. These unions inspite of receiv- ing notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice . Untill and unless the attitude of the union is changed . I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Courtto dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not inter- ested to proceed with the hearing of the case for dis- posal onmerit.
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an in- definite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dis- pose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/21 /97 - IR ( C- I) , dated, the 12 March, 1998 .
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer.
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . TISCO in reverting back Shri Wakil Paswal , Heavy Tyndal as Miner is justified? It not to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? "
का. आ. 1734.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/428/96- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1734. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-05-2003 .
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However , the management side though appeared before this Tribunal did not file written statement but filed only authorisation. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 23-3-98 and since then it is pending for disposal . As the concerned workman failed to appear registered notices were issued to the work- man but inspite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal. They also did not even re- spond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its dis- posal . The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/union . Naturaily responsibility rests with the concerned workman/union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94 ) FLR624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both parties remain
[No. L-20012/428/96- IR( C - 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4431 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas : Presiding Officer.
In the matter of the Industrial Disputes under Section 10(1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947.
Reference No. 45 of 1998
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Barraree Colliery of M/ s . BCCL and their workman.
Appearances:
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the employers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate
expectation for appearance of the workman inspite of issuance of registered notices . As per I.D. Act the work man excepting under provisions of section 2A is debarrc.. from raising any industrial dispute personally. The dis-- putes are mainly raised by the Union for their workmen . These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appearbefore the court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice. Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Defi- nitely it is the duty of the court to dispose of the reference on merit but depends on the cooperation of both sides . Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportu- nities had been given to the workman/Union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit .
Dated, Dhanbad the 5th May, 2003
ORDER
Under the facts and circumstances , I also do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.
B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer
नई दिल्ली, 27 मई, 2003
TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/428- 96- IR(Coal-I ) dated , the 20th February, 1998 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management in dismiss- ing Smt . Bara Laxmi Bourin , OBR Barraree Colliery from services w.e.f. 1994 is legal &justified . If not to what relief the concerned workman entitled ?"
का. आ. 1735.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण न. II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/12/2000- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th May, 2003
S.O. 1735. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref No. 84/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , No. II Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23/05/2003 .
[No. L-20012/ 12/2000- IR ( C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS TRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri B. Biswas PresidingOfficer.
In the matter ofthe Industrial Disputes ...der Section 10(1) ( d) of the i Act, 194
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . However, the manage- ment side though appeared before this Tribunal did not file W.S and filed only authorisation. It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 16-3-1998 and since then it is pending for disposal . Regis- tered notices were issued to the workman side but inspite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal. In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate of the reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The reference is made on the basis ofdispute raised by the concerned work- man/union . Naturally responsibility rests with the con- cerned workman union to assist the court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit. In view of the decision reported in 2002 ( 94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass 'No dispute' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is ex- pected to be disposed of on merit but when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S/ documents such expectation to dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is not expected that for years together the court wil pursue the matter suo moto with the
1590 G1/03-21 432
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
Reference No. 84 of 2000
Parties : Management of M/ s . BCCL and their workman Appearances :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the employers : None
State : Jharkhand Industry : Coal
Dated , Dhanbad, the 6th May, 2003
ORDER
TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D Act 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/12/ 2000 (C-I ) , dated, the 24th July , 2000.
SCHEDULE
"KYA BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED KEY KUSTORE KSHETRA KEY BURAGARH COLLIERY PRAVANDHAN DWARA KARMCHARI SHRI KARTIK YADAV, BHUTPURBA MINER, LOADER KO PRATIRUP ( IMPERSONATION) KEY ADHAR PAR SEVA MUKTA KARNA NAYA EVAM BIDHI KI DRISTI SEY SAHI UCHIT EVAM THIK HAI ? YADI NAHI TO KARMAKAR KIN LAVO KA HAKDAR HOGA?"
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . The management also did not appear in this Reference . It is seen from the record that the instant reference was re ceived on 12-9-2000 by this Tribunal and since then it is pending for disposal . Registered notices were also issued to the workman as well as to the management but none of them turned up . In terms of Rule 10B of the I.D Central Rules , 1957 submission of W.S. by the concerned work- man within 15 days is a mandatory one . The concerned workman not only violated the said provision of the Rules but also did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question which will arise is what will be the fate ofthe reference made by the Ministry for its disposal . The refer- ence is made on the basis of dispute raised by the con- cerned workman/ union . Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/ union to assist the court to dis- pose of the reference in issue on merit . In view of the deci- sion of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not be just and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both the parties remains absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit in absence of any W.S. and available documents. There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be dis- osed of on merit but when the parties do not take any tep or do not consider even to file W.S. Such expectation › dispose of the reference on merit comes to an end . It is ot expected that for years together the court will persue ne matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance the parties inspite of issuance of registered notices . As
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any Industrial dispute . The disputes are mainly ralsed by the union for their work- men. These unions inspite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived of getting any justice. Until and unless the attitude of the union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Defi- nitely it is the duty of the court to dispose of the reference onmeritbut it depends on the cooperation on both sides. Here record will elearly expose that sufficient opportuni- ties had been given to the parties but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for dis- posal onmerit.
In view of the facts and circumstances , I do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period. Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the feference in question on merit, the same is closed.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 मई , 2003
का. आ. 1736.- उत्प्रवास अधिनियम , 1983 ( 1983 का 31 )की धारा 3 उप धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार के संयुक्त सचिव और उत्प्रवास महासंरक्षी श्री डी. एस. पूनिया के समय- समय पर छुट्टी, प्रशिक्षण और दौरे पर होने के कारण उनकी अनुपस्थिति के दौरान श्री जे.पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव , श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार को उत्प्रवास महासंरक्षी का कार्य देखने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[संख्या एस -13011 / 1 /2003 - उत्प्रवास ] एम ० सी० मित्तल, उप सचिव New Delhi , the 28th May, 2003
S.O. 1736. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 , Sub -Section ( 1 ) of the Emigration Act, 1983 (31 of 1983 ), the Central Government hereby authorises Shri J.P. Pati , Joint Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour to look after the work of the Protector General ofEmigrants during the absence of Shri D.S. Poonia, JointSecretary to the Government of India in the Ministry ofLabour and the Prorector General of Emigrants on leave , training and tour from time to time.
[No.S- 13011/ 1 /2003 -Emig. ] M.C. MITTAL , Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 28 मई, 2003
का. आ. 1737.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 268/2001 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-40011/2/99- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
4433 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
New Delhi , the 28th May, 2003
( annexure) working since last 9 to 10 years without interruption is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled ?"
2. The case of the 2nd Party may be stated in brief:
S.O. 1737. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 268/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt. of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-05-2003 .
[No. L -40011/ 2/99 -IR (DU) ]
KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri S.K. Dhal , OSJS , ( Sr. Branch) , Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T-cum -Labour Court , Bhubanewar.
The Department of Telecommunication of the Government of India in the Ministry of Communication now called as Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited runs the Microwave system of telecommunication , which exists throughout the country. The Telecommunication system hasgot three parts namely Project , Maintenance and Circle. Thedepartmental activities have been devided into different regions i.e. Assam , Bihar and West Bengal . For each Department there is a head as Chief General Manager (Project) , Chief General Manager (Maintenance ) and Chief General Manager ( Circle ) for each reason . A person can work either in Project or in Maintenance or in the Circle and are inter transferable . If a workman is transferred from one Department to other , there is continuity in service . The State of Orissa is called as the sub - region under Eastern Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 268/2001
Date of conclusion of hearing-- 21st April 2003
Date of Passing Award - 19th May, 2003
Between:
The Management of the Director, Microwave (Maintenance ) , ETR, Microwave Campus , Unit -VIII , Bhubaneswar- 751012
1stParty-Management .
AND
Their Workmen represented through the President, Orissa Telecom Microwave Mazdoor Sangha, At , Raguripara , P.O. Dist . Bolangir - 767001 .
2nd Party- Union
Appearances:
M/ sJ.K. Nayak & Associates , Advocate
... For the 1st Party Management
M/sS.B. Nanda & Associates , Advocate
For the 2nd Party Union
AWARD
The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by Clause ( d ) of sub -section ( 1) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L -40011/2/99/ IR(DU) , dated 19-21-07-1999:
Telecom Region . In the Orissa Sub- Region three activities are under taken. Those are Project , Maintenance and Circle. All the above three Departments are dependable on each other for completion of a work and is called as entire telecom activity. For Maintenance of Orissa Sub-Region , there was aDirector, which has been renamed as Dy. General Manager. For the Project there are two Dy. General Managers , which was earlier named was Director. For Circle , there is a Chief General Manager for Orissa Sub- Region . The activity of the Telecom starts from Project . The Project work covers optical fiber cable line , tower orientation , power plant installation of generation system Radio Relay Bay and others . The manual work like digging of earth, construction ofmicrowave building, base of the tower are being done by the contractor . The works of the contractor are being supervised by the disputant of this reference . The works are in technical in nature and ordinary people can not perform the said type of work. After project work is over it is handed over to the Maintenance Section . During the project work the materials like equipments , charger machine , generator, Pole for towers are received by the disputants and after receipt of the same it is issued to the contractors . Oncompletion of the Project either in part or in full such completed work is officially taken over by the Maintenance for administrative convenience . The workers working in the Project are continued in the employment under the Maintenance. The services of the workers working under the Project are not terminated after cor pletion ofthe Project. According to the 2nd Party about 85% of the project workers are in an average taken over by the Maintenance and the rest persons are mostly retained for being deployed in the uncompleted work of the saia projector for other projects as per need . The whole work is done oy one and the same department of the Government, though in different administrative wings for convenience sake. The disputants continued for the Maintenance requirements of the microwave system besides other project requirements. They are taken in on regular basis with all Government service "Whether the action of the Management ofDirector, Microwave (Maintenance) Division , ETR, Deptt . of Telecommunications by not giving temporary status and not regularizing the services of the 168 workmen 4434
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
designations and grades for their regularization since 1996 with all consequential benefits from such dates .
3. The Ist Party-Management has filed their Written Statement. They have pleaded that, the disputants are not their employees . They were working in M/s . Oriental Security Service and on the basis of contract with M/ s . Oriental Security Service they being deployed and are working with the 1st Party -Management. The said M/s. Oriental Security Service is a contractor who used to provide security services on need basis as per the terms and conditions of the contract . They have further pleaded that, the disputants are not the workmen of the 1st party- Management . It has been further pleaded that , the project division under takes the construction work of microwave towers and stations etc. in different Telecom Divisions and the control of the Divisions vests with the Chief General Manager, Microwave Project , Calcutta. After closure of the project the work of the stations with the other equipments and machineries are handed over to the Microwave Maintenance Division under the Chief General Manager, E.T.R. , Calcutta. According to the 1st Party- Management , the Project and Maintenance divisions are two separate and distinct wings ofthe Telecom Department being controlled by two different Chief General Managers. The Project Division looks to work departmentally or through Contractors . During the continuance of the project work some casual workers are used to be engaged on need basis for other miscellaneous work since the work of the Project are not of perennial in nature . So, there is no necessary to engage casual workers continuously. After the closure ofthe Project work for the systems and Stations the respective Maintenance Divisions used to maintain the same by taking staff from different Telecom Circles on deputation. The disputants have never worked under the Maintenance . The casual labourers are engaged in the project only for the manual work and the technical works are done by the qualified persons of the Department. The natures ofjob performed by the casual labourers in the Project are not at all the essential requirement of the Maintenance division . The casual labourers engaged in one project division can not be engaged in another Maintenance division simultaneously and they were never takenby the Maintenance even after closure of the Project except on few occassion . The disputants are the workers of the contractor namely M/ s . Oriental Security Service since 1996 in different projects and under the Maintenance division they worked as security guards being deployed by the contractor. Their payment is made by the contractor but not by the 1st Party - Management . So , there is no employer and employee relationship between the 1st Party- Management and the disputants . So , they have prayed that the question of giving temporary status or regularization of the disputants does not arise .
4. In the rejoinder, the disputants have further pleaded that, specific recommendation for the regularization of Shri Aliva Sagar, Jogiram Khamari , Ramesh Prohit , Ramesh conditions unlike the above stated project workers belongings to the workmen categories . Initially the Union represented for 168 disputants for which the reference was made . But out of 168 disputants, 10 disputants have raised individual disputes for which separate reference has been made and one of the disputants namely Adesh Lal Srivastav is dead . The disputants were working through the State and they were discharging their duties as per the chart enclosed to their Statement of Claim . Their further case is that they are not and can not be treated as casual labourers because the jobs were in casual in nature and the nature of jobs performed by them was an essential requirement of the Project and the Maintenance as the case may be . They were in the Project and then in the Maintenance more or less since the dates shown against them in the chart appended to the reference. The rates of payment made to them was less than the minimum wages notified by the Central Government from time to time and they were shown as un - skilled Mazdoors . No extra payment ofwages for work performed on holidays or any over time was made . So, in the year 1997 , the Union namely, the Orissa Telecom Microwave Mazdoor Sangha came into existence and took up the case of the disputants against the 1st Party - Management . The Union took up the grievance of the disputants but the bureaucratic way of dealing with the grievances with its red tape formalities particularly in a situation where the Director for the Project and the Director for the Maintenance , Eastern Telecom Region for this State are two different functionaries and they largely depend upon the Regional Office at Calcutta with the Chief General Manager as the head and on the Secretary, Telecommunication, Central Government , New Delhi , the grievance of the disputants have been pushed to rusting. It has been further pleaded that the Project job and the Maintenance requirement are inseparable and must co-exist and run concurrently. But the artificial division created by the Departmentto show such workers throughout as project workers has been invidious and deceptive. The contractor brought to the record is a sham transaction because the department to escape direct liabilities with regard to the employment and service conditions of the disputants. The disputants took the matter with the Central Government with the Central Labour Directorate at New Delhi and the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central) and Asst . Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Bhubaneswar , but the case of the Central Government was directly involved and there is delay for Hakimg : eferice But when the grievance of the disputants e fulfilled they raised a dispute and subsoy chis , the present reference has been made . In their Claim Statement, prayer has been made to pass award declaring the disputants as temporary workers from their respective periods ofwork in the Project work and to declare them as regular workers since such dotes as applicable to the respective cases and to declare that the disputants are entitled to get all the benefits of temporary employees and of regular employees as per their respective dates of temporary status and regular status with appropriate 4435 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
1भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Chandra Bhoi , Biswajit Behera, Santosh Sethi , Andand Seth, Ananda Bag , Pitabas Saha , Mahavir Bag , Dasu Majhi , Biranchi Narayan Pradhan and others who had earlier been working in the Project and subsequently without break were continued in employment for the Maintenance work was made for their regularization .
5. On the above pleading of the parties the following Issues have been settled .
ISSUES
thecasual labourers working in the Department . This letter isdated 30-3-2001 . The letter contains the list showing the number of casual labourers for having temporary status as on 1-8-1998 , the number of casual labourers without temporary status who have completed 240 days in a preceeding year and in service as on 1-8-1998 and the number of casual labourers without temporary status work jobs of regular nature as on 1-8-1998 and the number of casual labourers without temporary status the work on jobs of casual/seasonal in nature. For the first three categories the number is 162 and the names of the disputants finds place in this list . So , that would suggest that the disputants are the casual workers who have completed 240 days and they were not given temporary status .
1. Whether the action of the 1st Party- Management ofDirector, Microwave (Maintenance) Division , ETR Deptt. of Telecommunications by not giving temporary status and not regularizing the services ofthe 168 workmen ( annexure ) working since last 9 to 10 years without interruption is legal and justified?
2. Ifnot, to what relief the workmen are entitled ?
6. On behalf of the 2nd Party two witnesses have been examined and41 documents have been exhibited in support oftheir case. On the other hand, the 1st Party-Management has examined four witnesses including the Managing Partner of M/s . Oriental Security Service . They have exhibited 13 documents in support of their stand .
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO. I
8. Coming to the stand of the Ist Party -Management all the disputants working under M/s . Oriental Security Service who has deputed them to the 1st Party - Management. It is submitted on behalf of the 2nd Party that , this arrangement is a sham and is only to avoid the claim of all the disputants. According to the 2nd Party they were not the workers of M/s . Oriental Security Service and they were working under the 1st Party -Management directly but the papers , which have been prepared to show that they are the workers of M/ s. Oriental Security Service , are the manufactured documents . In this case , one of the Managing Partners of M/s . Oriental Security Service has been examined and he is the witness No. 4 of the 1st Party - Management. In the cross examination this witness has deposed that prior to 1997 he had no acquaintance with the disputants . His evidence reveals that, after formation of M/s . Oriental Security Service no advertisement was made for calling for application from the persons to work under them and none of the disputants had submitted any application . He has furtherstated that, after they took over the contract work they took the same disputants as they had experience in the same place and in the same post as usual. This evidence would suggest that, the disputants were working under the Ist Party-Management directly prior to the functioning ofM/s. Oriental Security Service . It does not appears to be probable that, without calling for application M/s. Oriental Security Service took all the disputants who were working under the 1st Party - Management prior to its functioning . So, I find strength on the submission made on behalf of the 2nd Party that , the stand taken by the 1st Party- Management that , the disputants are the labourers ofM/s . Oriental Security Services is a sham transaction .
7. According to the evidence of the witness No. 1 examined on behalf of the 2nd Party in Orissa sub - reason three activities i.e. Project , Maintenance and Circle are under taken and all the above three departments are dependable to each other for completion of the work and is called as entire telecom activity. The 1st Party-Management has tried to convince the Tribunal that the Maintenance section and Project section are separate. After going through the evidence ofthe parties and documents ; I am of the opinion that the stand taken by the Ist Party- Management that the Maintenance and Project are different does not appear to be correct because the three parts i.e. the Maintenance , Project and Circle are under one department i.e. Telecommunication Department . So, it can not be said that the Maintenance and Project division are separate from each other. The attention of this Tribunal has been invited by Shri S.B. Nanda , the learned Counsel appearing on behalfof the 2nd Party to the documents exhibited on their behalf. Those are Ext . - 5 , 6 , 11 , 14 , 20, 22 & 32 and it has been submitted that the engagement of the disputants by the 1st Party -Management as casual labourers can not be disputed because correspondence has been made by the 1st Party-Management with their higher authorities to grant temporary status to the disputants . I find force on the submission made on behalf of the 2nd Party. It is sufficient ifreference can be made to Ext . - 14. This is the copy of the letter written by the Deputy General Manager , Maintenance ETR, Bhubaneswar to the Asst. General Manager (Admn. ) , Calcutta with a proposal for grant of temporary status to
9. After perusal of the evidence both oral and documentary placed on record and after hearing of both the parties , I am of the opinion that there is a relationship of employer and employee between the 1st Party- , Management and the 2nd Party-disputants and the disputants have completed 240 days and that the work of the 1st Party -Management is of permanent and perennial in nature and they are entitled for regularization by giving temporary status. Hence , this issue is answered accordingly.
4436
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 /JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
ISSUE NO . II
Ext - 10. Letter/Order dated 20-12-99 of the Director (Maintenance) , ETR, Bhubaneswar, addressed to Oriental Security Services along with Annexure .
Ext. -11. Letter dated 17-2-2000 ofthe AGM, Telecom ( SA) addressed to the Asst . Director General ( STN) New Delhi along with enclosures regarding information pertaining to Orissa Telecom Circle.
10. No materials have been placed before ,this Tribunal that the posts against which the disputants are claiming lying vacant . This Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to pass any order for creation of post for regularization of all the disputants, but this Tribunal can pass order that the disputants can be given temporary status as prayed for . As regards regularization the 1st Party -Management is directed to consider their case if posts are created/ sanctioned in future .
Ext. -12 . Circular dated 29-9-2000 of the Asst . Director General (STN), New Delhi regarding regularization of the casual labourers along with enclosures .
11. Reference is answered accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me
Ext. - 13. Letter No. DE/OFC (M) , BGR/DRM/Dt . 16-6-95 of Shri R.D. Yadava, DET, OFC (Mtce) Bolangir to all SDEs of theDivision ,
S. K. DHAL , PresidingOfficer
BEFORE THE C.G.I.T. -CUM-LABOUR COURT:
BHUBANESWAR
Tr. I.D. Case No. 268/2001
List of the Witnesses Examined on behalf of the 2nd
Ext. - 14. Series No. ETR/DM -BN /E -O/ 00-01 Dt. 30-3-2001 of Shri S.C. Mahapatra, Dy. G.M. MTCE ETR, Bhubneswar to Shri K.K. Chatopadhyay , AGM (ADM.) Offoce of the CGM, ETR, Calcutta.
Party-Workman :
W.W. No. 1 . Shri Prakash Chandra Patel
W.W. No. 2 .
Ext. -15 . Letter dtd . 15-10-92 of Shri K. Deheri , A.E. Microwave (Mtce. ) , Sambalpur to the T.D.E. , Bolangir.
Shri Yudhisthir Patel
Ext. - 16. Letter dtd. 24-5-93 of Shri B.K. Deheri , Sr. A.E.M. , (Mtce) . Sambalpur to the TDE , Bolangir.
List of the Witnesses Examined on behalf of the 1st Party-Management
M. W. No. 1 . Shri Bijaya Kumar Singh
M.W. No. 2 . Shri Bira Chandra Malick
M. W. No. 3 . Shri Dinabandhu Rout
M.W. No. 4. Shri Pratap Chandra Samantaray
Ext. -17 . Letter No. DE/OFC/ ( 11 )BGR/Casual Labour dated 16-10-1996 of Shri K.C. Hansda, DET, OFC Mice. , Bolangir to the Director Maintenance , ETR, OMS, Unit-8, Bhubaneswar-Discussion with LEO(C ), Titilagarh.
List of Documents exhibited on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman,
Ext. - 18. Minutes of discussion held on 1-1-1997 in the chamber of DET/OFC (M) Bolangir with the representative of Telecom M/W Mazdoor Sangha.
Ext - 19 . Sample copy of the Salary receipt with regard to the disputant.
Ext - 1. Letter, dtd. 30-6-97 to LEO(C), Titilagarh addressed to the Director (Maintenance ) ETR, Bhubaneswar, regarding payment of wages to the casual labourers .
Ext -2. Tripartite settlement/decision dated 5-9-97 between the Management and Union in presence of the ALC( C) .
Ext. -20. Letter No. 108 , dated 1-9-98 of the Director, Telecom Microwave Project, BBSR, addressed to the DET ( Admn . ) Kolkata regarding temporary status of the casual labourers along with enclosures. (Annexure - 1 and Annexure - II ) .
Ext -3. Strike notice dated 20-1-1998 of the Union along with 8 point charter of demands .
Ext. -4 . DOT Orders .
Ext. - 21 . Letter , dated 3-2-99 of the Director, (Maintenance) ETR, Bhubaneswar to all DEs of the sub - region along with enclosures.
Ext-5 . Circular dated 12-2-99 ofthe Asst . Director General ( STN) regarding creation ofpost for regularization of casual labourers/grant of temporary status.
Ext. -22. Letter dated 21-5-99 of the Director MW(P) addressed to the Divisional Engineer (Admn . ) regarding grant of temporary status to 102 casual labourers .
Ext -6 . Letter dated 23-7-1999 of the Director, MTCE , ETR, Bhubaneswar along with enclosures .
Ext. -23. Letter dated 30-9-1999 ofthe Dy. General Manager, (ETR), Kolkata addressed to the Director (STN) , New Delhi regarding grant of temporary status to the casual labourers .
Ext- 7. Letter dated 18-10-1999 of the ALC ( C ) , Bhubaneswar , addressed to the Director (Maintenance) ETR, Bhubaneswar, regarding implementation of recommendation of 5th Central Pay Commission .
Ext-8 . Sample copy ofbill dated 25-11-1999 of Oriental Security Services.
Ext. -24.. Letter dated 6-3-2000 of the Divisional Engineer (Admn.) Kolkata addressed to the Chief General Manager, Telecom , Orissa Telecom Circle , Bhubaneswar, regarding regularization/ grant temporary status to casual labourers .
Ext. -9. Letter dated 15-12-1999 of the Director (Maintenance) ETR, Bhubaneswar , addressed to the ALC ( C) ( II ) , coupled Bhubaneswar regarding strike notice with Charter of Demands along with enclosures .
Ext -25 . Letter dated 6-3-2000 of the DGM, ETR, Kolkata addressed to the Director (STN), New Delhi reg . Sanction of post for regularization of casual mazdoors [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
4437 Ext -26. Letter dated 28-4-2000 of Director, MP, 82 , Sahidnagar , Bhubaneshwar addressed to the TDM, Dhenkanal , regarding regularization of 20 casual labourers .
and (3 ) Workmen representedby the General Secretary , Orissa Telecom Microwave Mazdoor Sangha in the presence of A.L.C. (C) , Bhubaneswar .
Ext -B. Original agreement executed between the Oriental Security Service and D.G.M. , ETR, Bhubaneswar, Dated 1-1-1997 .
Ext -27 . Letter dated 4-7-2000 of the Director (Mtn . ) ETR, Bhubaneshwar addressed to the AGM ( Admn. ) Kolkata regarding sanction of post for regularization of casual labourers .
Ext-B/ 1 . Signature of Mr. Mohapatra .
Ext -28 . Enclosures on Ext. -25 .
Ext-B/2. -do -
Ext -B/3. Signature of Mr. Samantaray.
Ext-B/4. -do -
Ext-29 . Letter dated 19-7-2000 addressed to the C.G.M. , Orissa Telecom Circle , Bhubaneshwar regarding regularization/grant of temporary status to the casual labourers .
Ext-C Original agreement dated 30-7-2001 executed between the Oriental Security Service and DGM, Mtce , ETR, Bhubaneswar.
Ext -30. Letter dated 21-8-2000 of the Director (Staff- I) addressed to the CGM, ETR, Kolkata regarding regularization of the casual labourers .
Ext-D. Copy of COR No. R- II/ 1/97 dtd. 24-1-1997 issued by ALC( C) -cum -R.O. , Bhubaneshwar .
Ext -31 . Letter dtd. 30-8-2000 ofthe AGM (Admn. ) Kolkata addressed to the Asstt . Director General (STN) New Delhi , along with enclosures.
Ext-E. Letter No. 46 ( 5) 97 dated 27-2-1997 of ALC( C ) Bhubaneshwar with copy of the scheme No. L - II/ 05/97 dtd. 26-2-97 and L- II/24/2000 dated 3-5-2000.
Original licence issued by ALC( C) , valid up to May2003. Ext-F.
Ext -32. Letter dtd . 26-9-2000 of the AGM (HRD) Orissa , BBSR addressed to the CGM Telecom Project, Kolkata regarding regularization/ grant of temporary status to the casual labourers .
Ext-G. Copies of the subscribers Annual Statement of Accounts of Employees Provident Fund.
Ext -33 . Letter No. DSK. E-5 (II)/ 118 , dtd. 18-10-2000 ofthe Divisional Engineers , Telecom , Keonjhar.
Ext -H. Original receipts showing the payment of wages to the workers by Oriental Security Services .
Ext -34. Office Order dated 29-9-2000 regarding conferment oftemporary status to the casual labourers .
Ext -J. Form-31 in which application is required to be made for taking advance from Provident Fund.
Ext -35. Office order dated 14-2-2001 regarding regularization of casual labourers as regular mazdoor.
नई दिल्ली, 28 मई, 2003
Ext -36. Office order dated 14-2-2001 regarding regularization of temporary status mazdoor as regular mazdoor.
Ext -37. Letter dated 18-4-2001 of the G.M. (Maintenance ) , BSNL , Kolkata addressed to the DDG (P) BSNL, CorporateOffice , New Delhi to consider the case ofdisputant workmen.
का. आ. 1738.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-5-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Ext -38. Sample copies ofthe ACG- 17 forms .
[सं. एल-17011 /21/99-आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव Ext -39. Letter dtd . 27-2-1999 of the DE , OFC, Koraput regarding certificate of working as DRM, Bolangir Division.
New Delhi , the 28th May, 2003 Ext-40. Copy of letter ofthe Divisional Engineer, Telecom, Microwave Project , Sambalpur addressed to the Director,Microwave Project, Bhubaneswar.
Ext -41 . Copy of letter dated 26-9-94 of J.T.O. , VHF station, Titilagarh addressed to AEN, MCM, Bolangir .
List of documents exhibited on behalf of the 1st Party- Management:
S.O. 1738. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref No. 48/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Life Insurance Corporaton of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-5-2003 .
[No. L- 17011 /21/99 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
Ext.-A. Copy of minutes of Tripartite meeting dated 14-8-1997 between ( 1 ) The Director (Mtce . ), ETR, BBSR, Dy.G.M. , Mtce . ETR. , Kolkata , C.A.O. , Kolkata , (2 ) M/ s . Oriental Security Services 4438
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003/ JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT :
SHRIKANT SHUKLA
Presiding Officer
1.D. No.48/2000
Ref. No. L - 17011 / 21 /99 /IR (B - 11 ) dated 25-5-2000
BETWEEN
General Secretary, Central Zone National Life Insurance Employees Association , 70 D , Shyam Nagar, Kanpur (U.P. ) ( Espousing cause of Sri Prashant Nigam)
And
The Divisional Manager ,.Life Insurance Corporation of India . LIC of India , M.G. Marg, Kanpur -208001
AWARD
Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L - 17011 / 21 / 99 / IR (B - II ) dated 25-5-2000 referred the dispute Prashant Nigam for adjudication on following issues:
"Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India , Kanpur in terminating the services of Shri Parshant Nigam and Shri Prem Chand w.c.f. 27-7-99 is justified? If not to what relief is the concerned workman are entitled for ? "
Central Zone National Life Insurance Employces Association. 70 D, Shyam Nagar, Kanpur through its President Shyam Lal Shukla has filed the claim with allegation that Prem Chand and Prashant Nigam had been daily rated Peon from 15-9-90 to 26-7-99 and 31-8-96 to 26-8-2000 respectively. The services of the workman Prem Chand and Prashant Nigam were terminated from 27-7-99 and 10-7-99 respectively. While Prashant Nigam was re- employed on daily rated basis from 2-8-99 but the services ofPrem Chand has been terminated from 27-7-99 illegally. Both the workers completed more than 240 days in a year. The workman have been forced to work in other fictitious names by the LIC management and they were having no other choice to accept such directives of LIC for their livelihood . Since the services of the workmen terminated illegally therefore the workmen are entitled to be reinstated with full back wages from the date of illegal termination alongwith the seniority and continuity of service of all consequential benefits .
The case of the opposite party is that LIC is governed by Statutory Rules and Regulations in so far as recruitment of staff is concerned the staffs are governed by LIC of India Recruitment ( Class III and Class IV staff) Instructions 1993. The said instructions are statutory and binding upon the Corporation . Recruitment of regular employees can only be as per criteria and procedures laid down in the said instructions . The claimants Prashant Nigam and Prem Chand were casually engaged as casual labour on daily work basis . There is no question of termination as they
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] being engaged as daily wage basis , their services automatically come to an end at the closing of office hours . The employment of workmen as regular employee without following the procedures would be per se illegal and liable to be struck down. The Corporation established under Section 3 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act . 1956. It was subsequently amended in . 1981 direct consequence ofthe Amendment Act , was :
(a) The power of the Central Government under section 48 to make rules was extended to include the power to frame rules relating to the terms and conditions of service of employees of the Corporation, including those who became its employees on the appointed day under the Act .
(b) The power to make rules terms and conditions of the employees of the Corporation including those who became its employees under Section 11 ( 1 ) of the Act shall include the power to give retrospective effect to such rules and amend , by way of additions , variation or repeal , the regulations and other provisions referred to in Sub-section 2A, with retrospective effect from the date not earlier than 20th June 1979 .
The Corporation in exercise of power conferred by 48, the Central Government has amended various provisions ofthe Staff Regulations , besides inserting on provisions by way of rules in the said Regulations . By virtue ofthe provision of Section 48 of the Act , as amended in the year 1981 and also exercise of powers conferredby itby the Central Government from time to time, ' with reference to the provisions of the (Staff) Regulations, the (Staff) Regulations are statutory rules and shall have effect notwithstanding anything contained , among others , the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 or in any other law or in any agreement , scttlement , award or other instrument for the time being in force . The opposite party has contended the provision of the Industrial Disputes Act, or any other law Regulation 8 ofthe ( Staff) Regulations provides that notwithstanding anything contained in those regulations , a Managing Director, Executive Director (Personnel ) , a Zonal Manager or a Divisional Manager may employ staff in Class III and Class IV on the temporary basis subject to such general or special directions as may be issued from time to time. It is also provided that no person appointed as above shall only by reason of such appointment be entitled to absorption in the service of the Corporation or claim preference for recruitment to any post . The recruitment of Class III and Class IV staff in the Corporation are being made as per the provision of the LIC Recruitment ( of Class III and Class IV staff) Instructions , 1993 effective from 25th Feb. 1993 and which are a set of comprehensive and codified instructions laying down the detailed procedure . These instructions superseded the Recruitment Instructions , 1979 , which are statutory in character. The Recruitment Rules envisaged that recruitment of Class III and Class IV Staff shall be [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4439 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003 /ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
Onthe pleadings above the issue referred to Tribunal for adjudication is very important which is as follows ;
"Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India , Kanpur in terminating the services of Shri Parshant Nigam and Shri Prem Chand w.e.f. 27-7-99 is justified? If not to what relief is the concerned workman are entitled for ? "
The issue referred to the Tribunal is not for regularisation nor for pay parity etc. It has to see whether the action of the management of LIC Kanpur in terminating the services of Prashant Nigam and Prem Chand w.c.f. 27-7-99 is justified.
Admittedly Prem Chand is alleged that he has been terminated on 27-7-99 and Prashant Nigam was terminated on 10-7-99 , the allegation as contained in the page 2 para 3 of the claim statement is reproduced below :
That the services of the workmen Prem Chand and Prashant Nigam were terminated from 27-7-99 and 10-7-99 respectively. However, Prashant Nigam was re-employed on daily rated basis from 2-8-99 but the services of Prem Chand has been terminated from 27-7-99 illegally violating all rules and regulations ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 .
According to own allegation of the Central Zone National Life Insurance Employees Association ( INTUC) . Kanpur that Prashant Nigam was not terminated on 27-7-99 therefore his case is not covered under reference sent to the Tribunal for adjudication . It is also mentioned here that Prashant Nigam was re -employed .
Prashant Nigam has filed his affidavit paper no.5/ 7 to 5/9 wherein para two of the affidavit he has stated that he was terminated on 27-7-99 but in cross examination he has stated that he was terminated on 26-7-99 and he has affirmed in cross examination that he in employment now the days.
Therefore it is not proved that Prashant Nigam was terminated on 27-7-99 and therefore in respect of issue referred to this Tribunal to adjudicate whether the termination ofPrashant Nigam dated 27-7-99 isjustified. can not be replied. As in fact he was not terminated as referred .
Now the question Prashant Nigam was terminated on 27-7-99 and whether he has put up 240 days work . According to section 25 B the provisions are as follows; SECTION 25 B
done onDivision basis . These rules envisage the normal mode of recruitment as inviting applications through advertisement in the local newspapers and through Employment Exchange , except where number of vacancies is very small when recruitment shall be by inviting applications through Employment Exchange . These rules laid down that candidates shall make an application on plain paper with biodata of the candidate and send alongwith self addressed envelop and regular application form shall be issued for recruitment on the basis of the data furnished in application . This also provides that there shall be a pre - recruitment test of selection . The candidate who comes out successful in the test wherever prescribed are interviewed by a Committee for determining their merit and suitability for appointment on the basis of total marks awarded in pre - recruitment test and interview. Those found suitable for appointment after undergoing the process referred above are required to undergo a medical examination and are offered appointment only in the event of their being found medically fit . The process usually takes about 12 months for recruitment. But in order that the day to day administration is not handicapped . The Corporation will have necessarily to recruit some persons on temporary basis . Since these appointments are made in the exigencies of situation on many occasion , the incumbent may not be up to the requisite standard of suitability for appointment on regular basis and in some cases they do not satisfied the minimum eligibility conditions . This eventuality will occur, if persons are engaged on temporary basis without following the procedure in this regard. The Corporation has denied that Prashant Nigam and Prem Chand had ever been the workmen of the Corporation within the meaning of section 2 ( s) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 as they were not appointed by the Corporation as per the procedure laid down. The names of such casual workers working for two or three days were never kept on muster rolls and not their attendance were required . Consequently the relationship of employer and employee never existed between the Corporation and the two persons concerned . The opposite party has denied the number ofdays mentioned by claimant in their petition . These persons have also not been appointed temporary employees or otherwise. The management has alleged these two daily rates workers had never completed 240 days working in a year. Since both persons worked as casual on daily rate basis there was no question of their being ever completed 240 days in a year. It has been submitted that the present case is not for the regularisation of the workmen and since the two claimants were never employee of the Corporation and not entitled any privilege leave , casual leave and any other benefits etc. to which the temporary employees are entitled. As daily rated casual worker their engagement terminates at the end of every day and may commence whenever work is available for him and therefore there is no question of termination of the workmen in absence of any appointment letter does notarise .
( 1 ) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period ifhe is, for that perid, in uninterrupted service , including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an accident or as strike which is not illegal , or a lock out of a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;
1590 GI/03-22 1440
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 21 , 2003 / JYAISTHA 31 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
that he was paid on voucher. About payment of wages are concerned he has stated that sometime he was paid after a week sometime he paid 10 days or fortnight according to the convenient .
(2) where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause ( 1 ) for a period of one year or six months , he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer :
The management allegation is that he was a tea vendor and used to sell tea .
He has stated that he was paid in different names.
( a) for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made , has actually worked under the employer for not less than: ---
The photo copy of list have been filed in respect of working days but the same has not proved by Prem Chand and their A/R.
(i ) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and
On perusing the list paper 4/21 to 4/26 the working dayswork out in the particular month are as follow:
( ii ) two hundred and forty day, in any other case:
1. Calendar year 1990 work done 15 days
2. Calendar year 1991 wrok done 1 day
3. Calendar year 1992 work done 75 days (b) for a period of six months , if the workman during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made , has actually worked under the employer for not less than:
4. Calendar year 1993 work done 28 days
5. Calendar year 1994 work done Nowork (1) ninety five days , in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine ; and
(ii) one hundred and twenty days , in any other case.
6. Calendar year 1995 work done 27 days 146 days Explanation: For the purposes of clause (2 ) , the nuntber of days on which workman has actually worked ander an employer shall include the days on which:
Allegations of the claimant is that on the other days he worked but he was paid on fictitious of Rakesh , Dharmendra Kumar, Umesh , Satish, Sunil , Ajay , Ashok, Tarun ,Udai .
(i) he has been laid off under an agreement or as permittedby standing order made under the Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders ) Act, 1946 ( 20 of 1946 ) , or under the Act or under any other law applicable to the industrial establishment ;
Prem Chand has filed affidavit paper no . 5/2 to 5/5 but he has not stated in his affidavit that the persons named above are fictitious persons . No independent evidence has been produced on behalf of the workman Prem Chand that he worked in the names of other persons .
(ii) he has been on leave with full wages , earned in the previous year;
( iii) he has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; and
Onbehalf of the opposite Party Rajender Kumar, Asstt . Administrative Officer of LIC has filed his affidavit who was stated in his affidavit that Prem Chand was engaged in the branch office when emergency arose as casual labour and worked for few days . Asstt. Administrative Officer has denied that he has been selected as a employee . He has also stated that Prem Chand was a temporarily employce .
( iv) in the case of a female, she has been on maternity leave ; so , however, that the total period of such maternity leave does not exceed twelve weeks .
Asstt . Administrative Officer has denied that Prem Chand worked for 240 days in a calendar year. Whenever any emergent work arose and in case Prem Chand was available he was engaged as daily labour and was paid accordingly and in case he was not available he was not engaged . He has also stated in affidavit that no attendance register is being maintained for such labours.
Asstt . Administrative Officer has stated on oath in affidavit that Prem Chand runs a shop and he supplies tca. candle, refill , pen etc. In support of his affidavit he has filed three documents annexure 1 , 1A & 1B .
Admitedly the Prem Chand is not in continuous servicetherefore section 25 B ( 2) shall apply i.e. to say VALO m from Chand has to prove that he worked 240 dass aurira tea period of 12 calendar month preceding dafathers the calculation is to be made . Prem Chand has hizo lus affidavit paper no.2 / 5 to 2/6 who has stated in the cross examination that he was employed on daily wages he has also admitted that no vacancy was advertised . He has also stated that there was no written test or interview . He has also admitted that he has not been given any appointment letter in respect of the service .
Annexure 1 is for the payment of Rs. 373 which contains their description (शाखाबंदी में जलपान एवं चाय में व्य Prem Chand has also stated in the cross examination that he was not marked present or absent and has admitted [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
The next voucher is also for breakfast and tea amounting to Rs . 118 third is for the same purpose Rs.248.50. Payments made to Prem Chand is on 16-4-98, 30-5-98 and 4-6-98.
Asstt . Administrative Officer in his affidavit has denied Prem Chand has worked in the name of Rajesh , Dharmendra , Satishetc. The management witness said that Prem Chand has not worked in the name of other persons instead he wants get the service in LIC and therefore he under same conspiracy alleges that he worked in the name of other person which is not true .
Going through the evidence I come to the conclusion thatPrem Chand was not compelled by the officers of the opposite party to work in the name of other persons . In case Prem Chand has personated like other persons to induce others to take work from him and to pay in return , amounts to cheating . In the above circumstances Prem Chand can not take the benefit , if he has worked in the name of other persons so as to receive labour charges .
According to the statement of claim para 3 it is alleged that Prem Chand worked upto 26-7-99 and was terminated on 27-7-99 . It is not true according to annexure filed by him . It appears that Prem Chand wants to take benefit of the working of other persons . Employees Association has not proved that Prem Chand worked for 240 days in the calendar year preceding 27-7-99 . Therefore association can not succeed on this ground .
It is noteworthy that LIC has Recruitment Rules in class III and class IV cadre of the employees and the rules provide inviting of applications , submissions of names through Employment Exchange competitive test , interview, and medical etc. keeping in view the government policy of reservation . Admittedly Prashant Nigam and Prem Chand never passed through that procedure . Therefore they can not be treated as regular employee of the LIC.
Much has been stated in the claim statement about benefits to the temporarily employees and their entitlement about casual leaves etc , bonus, but the matter referred for adjudication is only to the extent that whether the management of LIC in terminating the services of Prashant Nigam and Prem Chand w.e.f. 27-7-99 is justified. The Tribunal can not go beyond this reference . According to Section 10 Sub section 4 it is provided that where a order referring a Industrial Dispute to ( a labour court , tribunal or national tribunal ) under this Section or in subsequent order the appropriate government has specified the points ofdispute for adjuication (the labour court or tribunal or national tribunal ) as the case may be shall confined its adjudication to those points and matter incidental thereto.
In the above circumstances I come to conclusion that both the workers Prashant Nigam and Prem Chand were not terminated on 27-7-99 and the issue is therefore the matter to hold the termination justified or unjustified does not arise . The matter referred to CGIT - cum-Labour
4441
भारत का राजपत्र : जून 21 , 2003/ज्येष्ठ 31 , 1925
Court , Lucknow is accordingly disposed of and the workman is not entitled to any relief.
LUCKNOW: 2-5-2003
SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नईदिल्ली, 6 जून, 2003
का.आ. 1739.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( VI ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 3995 दिनांक 8-12-2002 द्वारा भारतीय खाद्य निगम, जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्ट 6 में शामिल है, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिएदिनांक 10-12-2002 से छः मास की कलावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;
औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है ;
अतः अब , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्तअधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 10-6-2003 से छः मास कीकालावधिके लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है । [फा. संख्या एस -11017/5/91 - आई . आर. (पी . एल ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 6th June , 2003
S.O. 1739. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of the clause (n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O. 3995 dated 8-12-2002 the services in the Food Corporation of India which is covered by item 6 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period ofsix months from the 10th December, 2002 .
And whereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period bya further period of six months .
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub -clause (vi ) of clause (n) of Section 2 oftheIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be public utility service for the purposes of the said Act for a period of six months from the 10th June , 2003.
[No. S - 11017 /5/91 -IR(PL) ]
J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy.
Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .