रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल-33001 /99
सत्यमेव जयते
REGD . NO. D. L. -33001/99 भारत राजपत्र का The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 35]
No. 35]
नई दिल्ली, अगस्त में अगस्त 30, 2003 , शनिवार/ भाद्र 2- भाद्र 8, 1925 NEW DELHI, AUGUST 24-AUGUST 30, 2003, SATURDAY/ BHADRA 2 BHADRA 8, 1925 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकल जा जा सके SeparatePiring is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as aseparate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II- Section 3 Suction (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सतवधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
वित्त मंत्रालय आर्थिककार्य विभाग )
(बैंकिंग प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 14 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ ० . 2426- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970 के खण्ड 3 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) , खण्ड 5 , खण्ड 6 , खण्ड 7 और खण्ड 8 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् श्री एम० वेणुगोपाल इस समय यूनियन बैंक आफ इंडिया में कार्यपालक निदेशक, को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30-4-2005 अर्थात् उस महीने की अंतिम तारीख जिसमें वह 60 वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त करेंगे, उसके अंतिम दिन तक की अवधि के लिए बैंक आफ इंडिया के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबन्ध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[सं० एफ. 9/2/2003- बीओ- I ] रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव 2333GI/2003
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department ofEconomic Affairs)
(BANKING DIVISION)
New Delhi , the 14th August, 2003
S. O. 2426. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (a) ofSub- section (3 ) of Seciton 9 of the Banking, Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 , read with sub - clause ( 1 ) of clause , 3 , clause 5,, clause 6 , clause 7 and sub -clause ( I ) of clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Pro- visions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government, after con- sultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri M. Venugopalan , Executive Director, Union Bank of India as Chairman and Managing Director, Bank of India for the period from the date of his taking charge and upto 30-04-2005 i.e. the last day of the month in which he would attain the age of 60 years .
[F. No. 9/2/2003 -B.O. -I] RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy.
(5877) 5878
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
वस्त्र मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 18 अगस्त, 2003
का० आ ० 2427.-केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 61 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के अनुच्छेद ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्रीमती किरन धींगरा, संयुक्त सचिव, वस्त्र मंत्रालय , उद्योग भवन, नई दिल्ली का नामांकन, उपर्युक्तअधिनियम के उपबंधों के अध्यधीन, 23-2-2003 से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए बढ़ाती है ।
[फा. सं. 25012/56/ 99 -रेशम ] किरन धींगरा, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF TEXTILES New Delhi , the 18th August, 2003
S. O. 2427. In exercise of powers conferred by clause (b) of Sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 4 of the Central SilkBoard Act , 1948 (61 of 1948), the Central Government hereby extends the nomination of Smt . Kiran Dhingra, Joint Secretary (Silk ) , Ministry of Textiles, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi for aperiod of three years w.e.f. 23-2-2003 , to serve asmember of the Central Silk Board subject to the provi- sions of the said Act .
[F. No. 25012/56/99-Silk] KIRAN DHINGRA, Jt . Secy.
विद्युत मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2003
का० आ० 2428. केंद्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में नेशनल हाइड्रोइलैक्ट्रिक पावर कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, फरीदाबाद के नियंत्रणाधीन नेशनल हाइड्रोइलैक्ट्रिक पावर कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , 192/6 , छन्नी हिम्मत, जम्मू-180015 को, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतद्वारा , अधिसूचित करती है ।
[सं० 11017/2/94- हिंदी] अजय शंकर, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF POWER New Delhi , the 13th August, 2003
S. O. 2428.-In pursuance of Sub - rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union ) Rules, 1976 the Central Government, hereby, notifies the National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. , Regional office , 192/6 , Channi Himmat , Jammu - 180015 under the control of National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. , Faridabad , the staff whereof have acquired 80% working knowledge ofHindi .
[No. 11017/2/94 -Hindi ] AJAY SHANKAR , Jt . Secy.
कोयला मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 11 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ० 2429. केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजन के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में, कोयला मंत्रालय के अधीन कोयला खान भविष्य निधिआयुक्त के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों को जिनके 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1. कोयला खान भविष्य निधि, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय आसनसोल- I 2. कोयला खान भविष्य निधि, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय-आसनसोल- II 3. कोयला खान भविष्य निधि, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय-आसनसोल- III 4. कोयला खान भविष्य निधि, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय-आसतसोल- IV
[सं. ई-12019/1 /99 - हिंदी ] * गार्गी मुखर्जी, निदेशक MINISTRY OF COAL NewDelhi, the 11th August, 2003
S. O. 2429. In pursuance of Sub- rule (4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union ) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby, notifies the following Regional Offices of office of the CoalMines Provident Fund Commissioner under the Min- istry of Coal , whereof more than 80% staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .
1. Regional Office of Coal Mines Provident Fund- Asansol -I 2. Regional Office ofCoal Mines Provident Fund- Asansol -II 3. Regional Office ofCoal Mines Provident Fund-Asansol -III 4. Regional Office ofCoal Mines Provident Fund-Asansol - IV
[F. No. E- 12019/1/99-Hindi] GARGIMUKHERJEE, Director रसायन और उर्वरक मंत्रालय (रसायन और पेट्रोरसायन विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2003
का० आ० 2430.- केंद्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजन के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में रसायन और उर्वरक मंत्रालय , रसायन और पेट्रोरसायन विभाग के नियंत्रणाधीन " ख " क्षेत्र में स्थित निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है:-
राष्ट्रीय औषधीय शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान (नाइयर ) सेक्टर 67, एस ए एस नगर ,
मोहाली-160062 ( पंजाब )
[सं० ई-11019/5/ 2003-हिंदी] प्रवीण कुमार तेजयान, निदेशक MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS (Department ofChemicals and Petrochemicals) New Delhi , the 21st August, 2003
S. O. 2430.-In pursuance ofsub - rule(4 ) ofRule 10 ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government , hereby, notify the following office in region'B' under the adminis- trative control ofMinistry of Chemicals and Fertilizers ,De- partment of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, the 80% staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research (NIPER)
Sector 67 , SAS Nagar, Mohali - 160062 (Punjab) [F. No. E- 11019/5/2003-Hindi ]
P.K. TEJYAN, Director 5879
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2431.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप भानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बताए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नीओ वे टिक प्रा०लि० , 39-21-35 विध्यानगर, माधव धरा, विशाखापत्तन -530007 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले'डब्ल्यूटीपी- 1053' श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वे'टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्वात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2002/ 49 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है। यह मॉडल (आकृति देखें ) अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) पर आधारित तनावगेज टाइप भार सेल है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्राम है और जो मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( वर्ग -3 ) का है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्राम है । प्रदर्श इकाई प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रकार की है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्टज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
और केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह योषणा करती है कि महिल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनको अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है औरजिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के ई भान के लिए से 130 से 10000 के रें में है और 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के ई मान के लिए 500 से 10000 के रेंज में है तथा जिमका ई मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 ", या 5 × 10*, है जिसमें के भारतक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 (323) 200 पी. ६. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, निधिक भाग 5880
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEG3(ii)] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003.
S.O. 2431. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of Model of non - automatic weighing instrument Table Top Type (herein referred to as the Model ) of " Wtp - 1053 " Series belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class III ) and with brand name "WEIGHT TECH", manufactured by M/s Neo Weight Tech Pvt. Ltd. , 39-21-35 , Vidhyanagar, Madhavadhara, Visakhapatnam -530007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /02 /49 ;
TheModel (see the figure ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with digital indication of maximum capacity 20 kg, minimum capacity 40g. and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class III ) . The value ofverification scale interval (e) is 2g . The display unit is of light emitting diode type . The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternating current power supply.
Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with number ofvcerification scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accortance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (323)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5881
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2432.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट-14, जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " एम एस " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003/120 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 250 ग्राम औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 10 मि.ग्रा. (इ) का मान है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्टज प्रत्यावर्ती कारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
कीजाए । सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बन्दी
MS Series II CLASS .
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किठिक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक "ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 %, या 5 ×10% हैं जो धनामिक याऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा० सं ० डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 220 ) / 2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप बिज्ञान 5882
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II SEC. 3 (ii )]
New Delhi , the 22nd August , 2003
S.O. 2432. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non- automatic (Table Top Type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MS " series of High accuracy ( Accuracy class II ) and with brand name " ATCO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . ATCOM Technologies Limited. 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14 , G. D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned.the approval mark IND/09/2003 / 120;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 250g and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
CATCO
MS Series III .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2× 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accortance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model have been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (220)/ 2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5883 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त , 2003
का.आ. 2433.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानवा (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटको टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड , 6 ए, लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, 14 , जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ए पी पी टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, प्लेट- पेलेट ट्रक टाइप, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलग उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एवं डी/09/2003/ 121 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज आधारित भार सेल प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापनं मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 500 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धाद्य विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । 1 सील लगाना : स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बन्दी कीजाए ।
PalletTruck Weighing Scale
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के कैसे हीमेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक है और " " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन) की संख्या है और " ई" मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 %, के हैं जो धनात्मका या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा० सं० डब्ल्यूएम-21 (220 )/2001 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5884
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2433. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic, (Platform -Pallet truck type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " APPT " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. ATCO Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14, G. D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003 / 121 ;
The said model ( figure given ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 10 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 500g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening ofthe machine for fraudulent practices.
PalletTruck Weighing Scale
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of the section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 220 )/2001 ]
P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5885 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2434.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक । (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करना करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स भावपान इंडस्ट्रीज, गार्डन बरेली मिल के सामने, अंवाला कैफे के पीछे, डाकघर डोडरा , तहसील पलसाना, जिला- सूरत , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " एम पी" श्रृंखला के स्वतःखूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेगा डिगी " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 122 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 500 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा । विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
!
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया गया है ।
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिसके अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 1 मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. और अधिक के " ई " मागके लिए 5,000 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा ० सं ० डब्ल्यू एम -21 (20 )/2001 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2333 G1/2003-2 5886
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
New Delhi, the 22nd August , 2003
S.O. 2434. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Mudel is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
L Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (7) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non - automatic, (Table type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MP " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name "MEGA DIGI SCALE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured byM/s. Bhavpan Industries , Opp : Garden Vareli Mill , Behind , Ambala Cafe, Post Dodra, Ta. Palsana, District Surat, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2003 / 122;
The said model (figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 5 kg and minimum capacity of 25g . The verification scale interval (e) is 500 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;
Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
1 Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of the said section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (20)/2001]
P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , LegalMetrology 5887 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003 /भांद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2435.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किं उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट माप मानक (माडलीं काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स भावपान इंडस्ट्रीज , गार्डन वरेली मिल के सामने ,' अंबाला कैफे के पीछे, डाकघर डोडरा, तहसील पलसाना, जिला - सूरत, गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एम आई श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहिततोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेगा डिगी ' है ( जिसे इसमें माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003 /123 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज भार सेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हटर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना : स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबम्द भी किया गया है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोयणः करती कि काल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 दिया. से 300 कि.ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिसके अनुमोदित पाकल का विनिर्माण किया गया है और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम संख्या 5 ग्राम और अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 ×10*, या 5 × 10 *, है जिसमें के धमालक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहै ।
[फ. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (20)/200 )
पी.. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप वि 5888
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2435. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure giverr below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby puolishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non -automatic , (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MI " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name "MEGA DIGI SCALE " (herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s . Bhavpan Industries , Opp .: Garden VareliMill , Behind Ambala Cafy, Post Kdodra, Ta . Palsana , District Surat, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/123;
The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximun capacity of60kg and minimum capacity of500g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing in addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity from 50kg upto 300kg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negativewhole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and withthe same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (20 )/2001 ]
P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5889
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2436.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा रोमेनियन ब्यूरो ऑफ लीगल मेट्रोलॉजी, रोमानिया द्वारा जारी किए गए मॉडल केअनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र के साथ , उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधोंके अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा 3 के परन्तुक और उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कालवचा गैस एस. ए. वल्गेरिया स्टेट जागोरा 6000 पी.ओ. बाक्स 113 , बैस प्रापोरट्ज द्वारा विनिर्मित और भारत में मैसर्स डेल्टासिम्पलैक्स एनर्जी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड 93 , बजाज भवन, नारीमन प्वाइंट, मुंबई-400021 द्वारा परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के बिना विक्रीत एल.पी.जी. फ्यूलडिस्पेंसर एल.पी.जी. के 120, 220, 230 के मॉडल का जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 131 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;
मॉडल का ब्यौरा निम्नवत है :
मात्रा न्यूनतम : 5लीटर/मिनट
मात्रा अधिकतम : 50लीटर/मिनट
दाब अधिकतम : 25 बार
न्यूनतम तापमान/ अधिकतम तापमान 40°/+ 80 ° सेल्सियस
[फ. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 193 )/ 2002 ]
पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माम विज्ञान 5890
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
New Delhi , the 22nd August , 2003
S.O. 2436. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority along with the certificate of approval of model issued by the Romanian Bureau of Legal Metrology, Romania, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of model of LPG Fuel Dispenser LPGK 120 , 220 , 230 manufactured by M/s . Kalvacha Gas S.A. Bulgaria Stere Zagora 6000 P.O. Box 113 , Base Pryaporetz and sold in India without alteration or additions by M/ s . Delta Simplex Energy Pvt . Ltd. , 93 , Bajaj Bhavan , Nariman Point , Mumbai -400 021 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 /2003/ 131;
1 The details of the models is as follows :
Qmin : 5 litre/minute
Qmax
50 litre/minute
Pressure Max : 25 bar
tmin/ t max
-40°C/ + 80 ° C
[F. No. WM -21 ( 193)/2002]
P.A: KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5891 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2437.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नेशनल मीटर मैन्युफेक्चरिंग कम्पनी , 369/17, नानापेठ, पुणे -411002 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " आर टी एक्स-2002 " अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सीमीटर के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नेशनल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2002/ 142 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;
Manufactured By
National Meter Mfg. Co. 815. S. No 48 /3.Durrani Comp Kondhwe Khurd
मुद्रांकन प्लेट को स्टाम्प लगाने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उनकी छेड़छाड़ को रोकने के लिए पल्स जनरेटर, केबल संयोजन बिन्दुओं तथा मुख्य किराया मीटर पर मुद्रांकन किया जाएगा ।
उक्त मॉडल एक टैक्सी मीटर है जिसमें दूरी और समय मापक युक्ति सहित अंकक सूचक समाविष्ट है । यह निरंतर योग करता है तथा यात्रा के किसी क्षण में यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार उपदर्शित करता है । कतिपय गति से ऊपर तय की गई दूरी और कतिपय गति से नीचे लगे समय अनुसार संदेय किराया मीटर का कार्य है । मीटर का पठन सात खण्डीय प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड द्वारा उपदर्शित किया जाता है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (72 )/2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5892
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August , 2003
S.O. 2437. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now. therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issued and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a Taxi Meter with digital indication of ' RTX- 2002 ' with brand name " NATIONAL " ( hereinreferred to as the Model ) , manufac- tured by M/ s . National Meter Manufacturing Company, 369/17 , Nana Peth , Pune -411 002 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2002 / 142;
FARE PAISE-
DISTANCE - KM RATE
0- Day Fare
HIRED
Manufactured By
National Meter Mfg.Co.
1.Stopped, 2.Night Fare
OPPED
RTX -2002
ER ON
B15 . S No 48/3 . Durrani Comp. Mithanagar . Kondhwa Khurd. Pune-48
In addition to scaling the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done on the pulse generator , cable connecting points and the main fare meter to prevent their tempering for furaudulent practices.
The said model is a " Taxi Meter " with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring device it totalizes continuously and indicates at any moment of the journey, the charges payable by the passenger. The " fare to pay " is a function of the distance travelled above a certain speed and the length of the time occupied that speed below. The reading of the meter is indicated by seven segment Light Emitting Diode (LED).
[F. No. WM- 21 (73 )/2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5893 भारत का राजपंत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2438.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रीत इंटरप्राइजेज, 184 , स्मृति विहार सोसायटी, स्मृति मंदिर के पीछे, पी.डी. पण्डया, कालेज रोड, गोधसर, अहमदाबाद-382442 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " पी आर टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मास्टर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 112 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज भार सेल आधारित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले प्लेट फार्म प्रकार का अस्वचालित अंकीय उपदर्शन सहित तोलन उपकरण है । जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । प्रदर्शन यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरबन्दी की गई है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी यथार्थता वर्ग और उसी मेक वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्राम तक है के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि.ग्रा. और अधिक " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 , के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
1
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 147 )/2001 ] : पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2333GI/2003-3 5894
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) )
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2438.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instru- ment (Table top type) with " PRT" series belonging to high accuracy class (Accuracy Class II) and with brand name "MASTER " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Preet Enterprises , 184 , Smrutivihar , Society. Behind Smritimandir, P.D. Pandya , College Road , Ghodsar , Ahmedbad- 382442 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2003 /112;
The said Model ( see the figure ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument table top type with digital indication of maximum capacity of 20 kg. , minimum capacity of 100g and belonging to high accuracy class ( Accuracy Class 11 ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e' is 2g. The display unit is of light emitting diode ( LED ) type. The instruments operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power sup- ply. In addition to scaling the stamping plate . scaling done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
MASTE
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of the said section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' c ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' c ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10% , or 5x10 %, k , being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manu- facturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 147)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5895 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003 /भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2439.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रीत इंटरप्राइजेज, 184 , स्मृति विहार सोसायटी स्मृति मंदिर के पीछे , पी.डी. पण्डया, कालेज रोड, गोधसर, अहमदाबाद-382442 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पी आर पी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मास्टर " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003 / 113 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले प्लेट फार्म प्रकार का अस्वचालित अंकीय उपदर्शन सहित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । प्रदर्श यूनिट प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
MAS FIL
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदचत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषष्ण करहैि मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी यर्थाथता वर्ग और उसी मेक वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतः क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन और उसी सामग्री से किया जाता है जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 %, के है जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 147 )/200 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक मापः विश्व 5896
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August , 2003
S.O. 2439.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instru- ment (Table platform type ) with "PRP " series belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name "MASTER " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufacturedby M/s. Preet Enterprises , 184, Smrutivihar Society. Behind Smriimandir , P.D. Pandya , College Road, Ghodsar, Ahmedbad- 382442 and which is assigned the approval mark IND 09/2003/113;
The said Model (see the figure ) is a strain gauge type load cell based on automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 260 kg, minimum capacity 200g and belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) . The value of verification scale interval ' e' is 10g. The display unit is of light emitting diode ( LED) type . The instruments operates on 230V 50 -Hz alternative power supply . In addition to stamping the sealing plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
MASTER
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. and upto 300 kg . and with pember of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' valno 1x16 , 2x10 , or 5x10 , k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 147) /2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5897
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2440.-केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मरकेन्टाइल और इन्डस्ट्रियल डेवलपमेंट कम्पनी लिमिटेड, जैन आश्रम के निकट, वाटव, अहमदाबाद -382445 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एम एम बी- III " श्रृंखला के एक समान प्रकार के वितरक पम्प के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम आई डी सी ओ " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003/243 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) समायोजन के लिए अंशाकन चक्र सहित विस्थापन मीटर वाला एक वितरक पम्प है । इसका सभी प्रकार के पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के मापन के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है । इसकी प्रवाह दर 80 लीटर/ मिनट है । इसमें धन या परिणाम के लिए पूर्व नियत युक्तिहै ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 226 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5898
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2440.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report , is satisfied that the model described in the said report( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied con- ditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of Model of dispenser pump of analoguc type ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , and of MMB - III series and with brand name " MIDCO " manufactured by M/ s. Mercantile and Industrial Development Company Limited, Near Jain Ashram , Vatva, Ahmedabad- 382445 which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/243 ;
1 The said model ( see the figure given above) is a dispensing pump with positive desplacement meter pro- vided with calibration wheel for adjustment . It is used to measure all type of Petroleum products . The flow rate is 80 liter/Minute. It has preset device for money or volume .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 226 ) / 2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5899 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ० 2441.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का,60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अपनी यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मरकेन्टाइल और इन्डस्ट्रियल डेवलपमेंट कम्पनी लिमिटेड, जैन आश्रम के निकट , वाटव, अहमदाबाद-382445 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एम ई बी-- III " श्रृंखला के एक समान प्रकार के वितरक पम्प के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम आई डी सी ओ " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी 09/2003/244 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
PETROL
उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) समायोजन के लिए अंशाकन चक्र सहित विस्थापन मीटर वाला एक वितरक पम्प है । इसका सभी प्रकार के पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के मापन के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है । इसकी प्रवाह दर 85 लीटर/मिनट है । इसमें धन या परिमाण के लिए पूर्व नियत युक्तिहै ।
i
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (226 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5900
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi, the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2441. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed autho - rity, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of dispenser pump of withdigital display (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , and of MEB - III series and with brand name "MIDCO " manufactured by M/ s . Mercantile and Industrial Development Company Limited, Near Jain Ashram, Vatva , Ahmedabad- 382445 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /244 ;
on
PETROL
Indlan
The said Model ( see the figure given above ) is a dispensing pump with positive desplacement meter pro- vided with calibration wheel for adjustment. It is used to measure all type of Petroleum products. The flow rate is 85 liter /Minute.
[F. No. WM- 21 (226)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5901 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2442.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मरकेन्टाइल और इन्डस्ट्रियल डेवलपमेंट कम्पनी लिमिटेड, जैन आश्रम के निकट, वाटव, अहमदाबाद-382445 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एम ई बी- एम आई एक्स " श्रृंखला के एक समान प्रकार के वितरक पम्प के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम आई डी सी ओ " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी 09/2003/245 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) समायोजन के लिए अंशाकन चक्र सहित विस्थापन मीटर वाला एक वितरक पम्प है । इसका सभी प्रकार के पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के मापन के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है । इसकी प्रवाह दर 85 लीटर/ मिनट है । इसमें धन या परिमाण के लिए पूर्व नियत युक्तिहै ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 226 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2333 G1/2003-4 5902
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August , 2003
S.O. 2442. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority. is satisfied that the Model described in the said report is satisfied that the model described in the report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied con- ditions:
Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of dispenser pump ofdigital type (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), and of MEB - MIX series and with brand name " MIDCO " manufactured by M / s . Mercantile and Industrial Development company Limited , Near Jain Ashram , Vatva , Ahmedabad-382445 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003/245;
The Model ( see the figure given above ) is a dispensing pump with positive displacement meter provided with calibration wheel for adjustment. It is used to measure all type of Petroleum products. The flow rate is 85 liter/ Munute The display is of flourscent type . It has preset device for money or volume.
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 226 )/ 2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5903
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड़ 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2443.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपंबधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालवानी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट-14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " सी एस " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, क्रेन टाइप, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 145 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज आधारित भार सेल प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 1 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बन्दी कीजाए।
Remote
और, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इम प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5 टन है और जो 5 ग्रा. या उसमें अधिक के " ई " भाव के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन भापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 % है ' के ' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
(फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 316 ) पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप 5904
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]
New Delhi , the 22th August, 2003
S.C. 2443 Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the pro isions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained se and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicat- ing, non-automatic (crane weighing type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO" , ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufac- turea by M/s ATCOM Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala , Mumbai -400 031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/145;
The said model ( see the figure given ) is a strain gauge type load cell weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3 tonne and minimum capacity of 20kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Remote
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section, 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity from 50 kg . upto 5 tonne and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with' e' value 1x 10% , 2 × 10k, or 5× 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manu- factured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 316 )/2001 ]
PA. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5905
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003 /भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2444.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपंबधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड , 6 ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट -14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यू बी" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , ( बहुभार सेल से युक्त वे ब्रिज टाइप ) अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 146 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) बहुभार सेल से युक्त वे ब्रिज प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
कीजाए । सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरबन्दी
ATCO Truth by weight
Wingning Solano Cоверилу
ELECTRONIC WEIGH BRIDGE
और, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुएँयह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 टन से अधिक और 60 टन तक है और जो 1 किग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * है ' के ' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5906
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22th August , 2003
S.O. 2444. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to incintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicat- ing, non - automatic (Weigh bridge with multi load cell type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EWB " series ofMedium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO" , ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/ s ATCOM Technologies Limited , 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala , Mumbai -400 031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/146;
The said model (see the figure given) is a (Weigh bridge with multi load cell type ) weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
ATCO Truth by
Sulations Company
ELECTRONIC WEIGH BRIDGE
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section, 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weigh- ing instrument of same accouracy class , performance and of same make with maximum capacity from 5 tonne upto 60 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1kg. or more and with ' e ' value 1x 10% , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 316) /2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5907 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2445.- केंद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपंबधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट -14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई-400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यूबी" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , वे ब्रिज टाइप के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्नन आई एन डी/09 /2003/147 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
उक्तमॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) वे ब्रिज टाइप के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट, तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धाख विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरबन्दी कीजाए ।
ATCO Truth by weleht
Digitizer
LoadCell
CONVERSION KIT
और, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 टन से अधिक और 50 टन तक है और जो 1 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 316 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5908
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( іі) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2445.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicat- ing, non - automatic ( conversion kit for Weigh bridge type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "EWB" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO" , ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/s ATCOM Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14 , G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400 031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/ 2003 /147;
The said model ( see the figure given) is a (conversion kit for Weigh bridge ) weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 20 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machinc for fraudulent practices.
ATCO
Truth by
Wingang Solutii Саворвау
Digitizer
LoadCell
CONVERSION KIT
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section, 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the other weighing instrument of same accuracy class , performance and of same make with maximum capacity above 5 tonne upto 50 tonnes and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 1kg. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 316)/ 2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5909 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2446.- केंद्रीय सरकार को, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालवामी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट-14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई-400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , ( टेबल टाप दोहरे रेंज टाइप ) अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन, उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई। एन डी/09/ 2003 / 148 समनुदेशित किया गया है,अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( चीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज आधारित दोहरे रेंज प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. हैं । सत्यापन माषमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 0.5 सा. 3 कि.ग्रा. तक और 1 ग्रा. 3 कि.ग्रा. से और 6 कि.ग्रा. तक है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्वकलमात्वक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श बेलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
कीजाए । सीललगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कषटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरबन्दी और, केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि मॉडल उक्त के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उम्री श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. है और जो 1. मि. ग्रा..से $0 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 1 के है जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम-21 (316)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2333GI/2003-5 5910
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2446.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicat- ing, non-automatic (Table top dual range type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AW" series ofHigh accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name "ATCO", (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufac- tured by M/s ATCOM Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400 031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/148;
The said model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge typed based dual range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 6kg . and minimum capacity of 25g. The verification scale interval (e) is 0.5g. upto 3 kg. and 1g. above 3kg. and upto 6 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ment of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum. capacity from 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e' value 1x 10 , 2× 10k, or 5× 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufac- tured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( it ) ]
5911
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2447.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल अथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट-14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031. द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप दोहरी रेंज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003/149 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित दोहरे रेंज का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 6 कि. ग्रा. तक के लिए 2 ग्रा. और 6 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 15 कि. ग्रा. तक के लिए 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरबन्द की जाए।
AW Series Class III
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. तक है और 100 मि . ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक" ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (316) /2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5912
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2447.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
1 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self-indicating , non - automatic (Table top - dual range type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AW" series ofMedium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO" , ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufac- tured by M/ s ATCOM Techologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14 , G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai- 400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 149 ;
The said model ( see figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based dual range weighing instru- ment with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 40g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. upto 6kg and 5g above 6kg and upto 15kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the ma- chinc for fraudulent practices .
AW Series Class III
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of the Section 36 of the said Act , the Cen- tral Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instru- ment of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg to 2 g . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , or 5x10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5913
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नईदिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2448.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1975 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉयल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट -14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म दोहरी रेंज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 150 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित दोहरे रेंज का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) का मान 15 कि. ग्रा. तक के लिए 5 ग्रा. और 15 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 30 कि. ग्रा. तक के लिए 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरबन्द किया जा सकता है:
A1시 ECONOMY PLATFORM SCALE (Class III)
ATCO
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला केके वैसे ही सेक और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा.या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापसान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक है आ शून्य के समतुल्य है । " :
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (316)/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5914
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2448.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non-automatic ( Platform- dual range type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AW " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO " , ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufac- tured by M/s ATCOM Techologies Limited , 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai- 400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/ 150;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based dual tange weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g upto 15kg and 10g above 15kg and upto 30kg, It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the ma- chine for fraudulent practices.
A1시
ECONOMY PLATFORM SCALE . (Class III)
ATCO
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 300kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1x 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the ap- proved said model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5915
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2449.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा मौप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल' यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालबामी इत्त्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट 14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम। यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) बाले " ए पी एच " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का माम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003/ 15 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना : स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मोहरबन्द किया जा सकता है ।
HERCULES HEAVY DUTY BAR SCALE
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला केवैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5000 कि. ग्रा . तक है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 टम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* था 5 × 10 * के है जो धमात्थक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5916
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2449.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely tò maintain accuracy over periods of sus- tained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non-automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "APH" series of Medium accuracy (Ac- curacy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO " , (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/s ATCOM Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 151 ;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1200kg. and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indiantes the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing may be done to prevent the orening of the ma- chine for fraudulent practices.
HERCULES HEAVY DUTY BAR SCALE
(Class III)
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity from 50kg and upto 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 50g . or more and with ' e' value 1x 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5917 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30. 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2450.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट 14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई-400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " एम एम" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप दोहरी रेंज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटकी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003/ 152 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित दोहरे रेंज का तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का भान 6 कि. ग्रा. तक के लिए 1 ग्रा. और 6 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 12 कि. ग्रा. तक के लिए 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलं बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मोहरबन्द किया जा सकता है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखल के वैसे ही मेक और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की सख्या 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10* के है जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2333G1/2003-6 5918
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2450.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) (s in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain it accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
3 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non -automatic (Table top dual range type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MM" series of high accu- racy ( Accuracy class II) and with brand name " ATCO", (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/sATCOM Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai-400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2003/152;
The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type éell based dual range weighing instru- ment with a maximum capacity of 12kg. and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval (e) is 1g upto 6kg.and 2g above to 6kg. and upto 12kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alter- nate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the ma- chine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instru- ment of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img and with number ofverifi- cation scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for " e " value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10k, 2× 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5919
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
कि का. आ. 2451.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है । उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानकर (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
जतः , अय, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड , 6 ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट -14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग ३ ) वाले " एम एम " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार) केमॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एवं डी/09/2003/153 सम्नुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ण प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बन्द किया जा सकता है ।
ATCO Truth by
SERIES
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेफ और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन भापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एक ) कीसंख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316)/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5920
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2451.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating , non -automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MM" series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO " , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/ s. ATCOM Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road , Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /2003/ 153 ;
The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge typed based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the ma- chine for fraudulent practices .
ATCO Truck by
RIES
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instru- ment of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of veri- fication scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for " e " value of 5g . or more and with' e' value 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k , or 5× 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved said Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5921
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2452.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मौनक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट -14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वाडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित माध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एम पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म दोहरी रेंज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्हआई एन डी/09 /2003/158 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज भार सेल आधारित दोहरी रेंज का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 30 कि. ग्रा. तक 5 ग्रा. और 30 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 60 कि. ग्रा. तक 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बन्द किया जा सकता है ।
ATCO
AP PLATFORM SCALE
(Class II)
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज मेंसत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10* के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316)/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5922
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2452.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
1 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non - automatic ( Platform dual range type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AP" series ofHigh accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name " ATCO" , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/ s. ATCOM Techologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14 , G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 2003/158 ;
The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based dual range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. upto 30 kg . and 10g. above 30kg . and upto 60kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ;
Sealing : In addition to scaling the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the ma- chine for fraudulent practices .
湯
ATCO
AP PLATFORM SCALE (Class II)
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central' Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same scrics with maximum capacity upto 300kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 50,000 for ' c' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' valuę 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5x10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 (316)/2001]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 5923 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
नईदिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2453.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानके ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 - ए लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट 14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्चा यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एन्बी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम, " एंटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एवं डी/09/2003/159 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदनु प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्राम औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिश व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बन्द किया जा सकता है ।
AB Series Class II
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा . से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316) /2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5924
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2453.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rulcs , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic, (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AB " sties of High accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name " ATCO " , ( hereinafter referred to as the model ) manufactured by M/s . ATCOM Techologies Limited, 6A . Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14,G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai - 400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 159;
The said model ( figure given ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 600g . and minimum capacity of 200mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg . It has a tare device withe a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effcct . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
AB Series Class II
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section , 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar makc . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Imgto 50mg and with nunber of verifica- tion scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' c ' valuc of 100mg or more and with 'c ' value 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k, or 5x10 %, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM - 21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Mctrology 5925
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2454.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानके (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 - ए लालवामी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट-14 जी डी अम्बेडकर रोड, वडाला, मुंबई-400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एच एसे " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( विलम्बन प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एम डी/09/2003/160 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
10
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाव गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बम्द किया जा सकता है ।
ATCO
Truth by
HANGING SCALES
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि शक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) संख्याऔर 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल की संख्या सहित 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 * के हैं , जो घनातमक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप बिज्ञान 2333GI/2003-7 5926
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (fi) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2454. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic , (Hanging type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "HS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO " , ( hereinafter referred to as the model ) , manufacturedby M/s . ATCOM Techologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate , 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/160;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60kg and minimum capacity of 400g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50- Hertz alternate éurrent power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
ATCO Truth by
HANGING SCALES
Further, in cxercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section, 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 300kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with 'e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM- 21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2455, केद्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए सैसर्स एटकाम टेक्नालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 - ए, लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट-14 , जी. डी. अम्बेडकर रोड, वडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता बर्ग ( अथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003/ 161 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनत्तम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत्त प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना : स्टास्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहरणन्द किया जा सकता है ।
EP Class III
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि क्षमत मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी भूजला केउसी मेक और कार्यपालन वाले तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल की संख्या सहित्त 30 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 500 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 10* या 5 × 10* के हैं , जो धनातमक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (316)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5928
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2455.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating , non -automatic , (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EP" series of Modium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . ATCOM Technologies Limited , 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai -400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 161 ;
The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
EP Class III
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section , 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 500kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g or more and with' e ' value 1x 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM -21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5929
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2456.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानवा (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम टेकनालाजीज लिमिटेड, 6 - ए, लालवानी इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट -14, जी. डी. अम्बेडकर रोड, वडाला, मुंबई -400031 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एफ पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एनं डी/09/2003/ 162 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) दाब गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सील लगाना: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए मुहर बनंद किया जा सकता है ।
FLAME PROOF SCALE (Class III)
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसीं सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 30 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 500 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 316 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5930
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi, the 22nd August, 2003
S.O. 2456. Whereas the Central Government ; after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the said Model of the self- indicating , non- automatic, (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " FP " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " ATCO" ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . ATCOM said Technologies Limited, 6A, Lalwani Industrial Estate, 14, G.D. Ambedkar Road, Wadala, Mumbai-400031 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 162;
The said Model ( See the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg. and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply;
Sealing: In addition to seating the stamping plate sealing may be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
FLAME PROOF SCALE
(Class III)
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section, 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 500kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 50g or more and with.'e' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (316)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 5931 भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड. 3 (ii) ]
पेट्रोलियम एवं प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
नई दिल्ली, 18 अगस्त, 200
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in the Land)Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
का.आ. 2457.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा सलाया मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम- कोयली खण्ड के कार्यावयन हेतु पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one-days from the date onwhich the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the generalpublic, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or , laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandys, Competemt Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipelines Division ) , P.B. No. 4, P.O. Viramgam, Distt . Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 382150.
SCHEDULE
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग , के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
District : Kheda
Taluka: Nadiad
State: Gujarat
Area
Hectare Are Sq. Mtr .
Survey Sub-
Division
Name of the Village No.
No.
6
5
3
4
1
2
73
00
0
Keravi
99
0
00
860 1040
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर. एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन प्रभाग , पो. बा. सं. 4, डाकघर -विरमगाम , जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात -382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
[F. No. R. -25011/4/2002 -OR - IJ RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
जिला: खेडा
राज्य: गुजरात
तालुक: नडीयाद
r
नई दिल्ली, 18 अगस्त, 2003
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर
गांव का नाम सर्वे संख्या उप खण्ड
संख्या
4
5
6
3
2
1
00
73
0
860
का.आ. 2458.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा सलाया मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम- कोयली खण्ड के कार्यान्वयन हेतु पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
केरीयावी
00
99
0
1040
[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/4/2002- ओ. आर. - 1 ]
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइनें बिछाने, के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए; - रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas New Delhi , the 18th August , 2003
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय कीघोषणा करती है;
S.O. 2457. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum (crude ) from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Viramgam -Koyli Section of Salaya - Mathura Pipeline System;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर. एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary 5932
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 18 अगस्त, 2003
इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन प्रभाग , पो. बा. सं. 4, डाकघर - विरमगाम, जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात -382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
तालुक : महेमदाबाद जिला: खेडा
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
का.आ. 2459.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा सलाया मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम कोयली खण्ड के कार्यान्वयन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
गांव का नाम सर्वे संख्या उप खण्ड हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर
संख्या
1
2
3
4
5
6
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाएं;
3
0
खुमरवाड 495
01
90
[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/4/2001-ओ. आर. - 1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 18th August , 2003
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
S.O. 2458. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum (crude) from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat , pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Viramgam- Koyli Section of Salaya -Mathura Pipeline System;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख सेजिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर. एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन प्रभाग, पो. बा. सं . 4, डाकघर- विरमगाम, जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात- 382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
अनुसूची
तालुक: विरमगाम जिला: अहमदाबाद राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम सर्वे संख्या उप खण्ड हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelincs ( Acquisition of Right of User in the Land) Act . 1962 (5 ) of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
संख्या
1
2
3
4
5
6
664
3
0
03
16
हॉसलपुर
सेरेश्वर
[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/45/2001-ओ. आर. - 1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one-days from the date on which the copics of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, arc made available to the general public , object in writingto the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya. Competemt Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. ( Pipelincs Division) ,P.B. No.4, P.O. Viramgam , Distt. Ahmedabad, Gujarat -382150.
New Delhi, the 18th August , 2003 SCHEDULE
State:Gujarat
Taluka: Mehmed- District: Kheda bad
Arca
Naare of
Sub- Hectare Are Sq .Mtr.
Survey
Division
theVillage No.
S. O. 2459. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum (crude) from Viramgam toKoyli in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Viramgam - Koyli Section of Salaya - Mathura Pipeline System;
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
(0
Khumarvad 495
01
90
And,whereas , it appears to the Central Government thatfor the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
[F. No. R. -25011 /4/2001 -OR - I
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and 5933
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003 /भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying ofthe pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya, Coinpetent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipelines Division ) , P. B. No. 4 , P.O. Viramgam , Distt . Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 382150 .
SCHEDULE
अनुसूची
जिला : अहमदाबाद राज्य : गुजरात तालुक: साणंद
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर
गांव का नाम सर्वे संख्या
एयर वर्ग मीटर
उप खण्ड संख्या
4
5
16
3
2
1
0
03
2
2
57
कलाना
10
0
03 117
03
79
0
2
137
09
04
0
133
0
00 150
72 [फा..सं. आर.- 25011/45/2001-ओ. आर. -1]
State : Gujarat
Taluka:Viramgam District : Ahmedabad
Area
Hectare Are Sq. Mtr .
Survey No.
Name of the Village
Sub- Division No.
5
6
4
3
1
2
16
03
3
0
664
Hansalpur Sereshvar
[F. No. R. -25011 /45/2001 -OR - I]
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 18 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2460.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम ( अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम- कोयली खण्ड के कार्यन्वयन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री आर. एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइललाइन प्रभाग , पो. बा. सं. 4 , डाकघर- विरमगाम , जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात- 382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
2333 G1/ 20038
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th August , 2003 S. O. 2460.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum (crude) from Viramgam toKoyli in the State of Gujarat, pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Viramgam -Koyli Section of Salaya-Mathura Pipeline System;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty - one days from the date onwhich the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipelines Division ), P. B. No. 4, P.O. Viramgam, Distt .Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 382150 .
SCHEDULE
State : Gujarat District: Ahmedabad
Taluka: Sanand
Area
Hectare AreSq. Mtr .
Survey No.
Name of theVillage
Sub- Division No.
6
5
4
3
2
1
03
12
0
2
57
Kalana
03
10
0
117
79
03
0
2
137
09
04
0
133
72
00
0
150
[F. No. R -25011 /45/2001 -QR- 1 ] RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
5934
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
1
ठाणे का. आ. 2461.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन दहेज- हजीरा उरान- धाबोल पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, 7 वां तल, बी- विंग, आरसीएफ प्रियदर्शिनी बिल्डिंग , मुम्बई-400022 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसूची
जिला तहसील गाँव
खसरा नं. अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में) 1
2
3
4
5 ठाणे कल्याण वसंत सेलवली 114/11 पी 00-33-00
114/13/1 पी
114/13/2पी
114/14पी
116/1 पी
116/4पी
116/3पी
116/2पी
00-27-00
खाडी
00-47-( ) )
45/0 पी
00-15-00
53/0पी
54/0पी
00-33-00
51/10पी
00-45-00
57 पी
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5 कल्याण आभिवली 26पी
00-17-00
38पी
41पी
00-65-00 घोटसई
56पी
00-12-0
42/7पी
51/2पी
चिंचवली 19/7पी
19/4पी
19/5पी
18/3पी
3/12पी
17/7पी
15/5पी
42/0पी
भिवंडी
40/0पी
लाप बुद्रुक
00-34-00
41/1पी
00-17-00
41/2पी
00-11-00
31/ए/ 1 पी
31/ए/3 पी 00-19-00
31/ए/6पी
00-16-00
31/ए/7पी
00-11-00
30/ए पी.
00-28-00
20/1 पी
00-16-00
202/पी
00-15-00
20/3 पी
00-13-00
20/4पी
180/5 पी
00-15-00
180/6 पी
00-12-00
180/7 पी
00-11-00
7/3पी
7/4पी
00-15-00
141/पी
00-14-00
142/1 पी
00-29-00
137/1 पी
(X-07-(X)
137/2 पी
00-18-00
133/1 पी
00-18-00
133/2पी
( X0-19-00
127/2 पी
127/1 पी
00-11-00
97/1 पी
00-33-00 5935
भारते का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
1
3
5
2.
97/2पी
ठाणे भिवंडी लापबुद्धक
which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
97/3पी
103/0 पी
103/12 पी 00-17-00
103/13 पी
00-29-00
103/14 पी
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
99/4पी
99/2पी
42/ बी पी
ठाणे भिवंडी लाप बंदूक
183पी
182पी
111/16पी
00-14-00
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one -days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section (1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land tothe Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, 7th Floor, B -Wing, RCF Priyadarshini Building, Mumbai -400 022(Maharashtra) .
150/0 पी
SCHEDULE
00-12-00
160/0पी
99/4पी
District Tehsil Village
Survey No.
Area Acquired (InHect) 99/2पी
00-06-00 .
42/बीपी
Vasat Shelavli 114/ 11P
Thane Kalyan
00-18-00
114/13/1 P देवली
4पी
26/10/1 पी
114/13/2P
00-14-00
26/10/2पी
114/14P
00-21-00
26/12पी
116/1P
26/13 पी
116/4 P
26/14पी
116/3 P
116/2P
00-27-00 26/15पी
38/7पी
जांभिवली
Khadi
00-47-00
00-19-00
साखरोली
नदी
अबरनाथ
00-15-00
45/0P
21/1 पी
00-45-00
वाडी
53/0P
नाला
54/0P
187पी
00-45-00
51/10P
57P
(फा. सं. एल-14014/12/03-जी.पी. ]
00-17-00
26P
Ambhivali
स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक
38P
New Delhi , the 19th August, 2003
00-65-00
41 P
00-12-00
56P
Ghotsai
42/7P
51/2P
19/7 P
Chinchawali
S, O . 2461.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthe transportation of natural gas through Dahej -Hazira- Uran-Dhabol Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Maharashtra, a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
19/4P
19/5 P
18/3 P
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under 5936
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8. 1925
1
2
3
4
5 Thane Kalyan
3/12 P
Chinchawali
17/7 P
15/5 P
42/0P
00-34-00 Thane Bhiwandi Lap Budruk 40/0 P
41/1 P
00-17-00
41/2P
00-11-00
31/A/ 1 P
31/A/3 P
00-19-00
31/A/6 P
00-16-00
31/A/ 7P
00-11-00
30/AP
00-28-00
20/1 P
00-16-00
20/2P
00-15-00
20/3P
00-13-00
20/4P
180/5 P
00-15-00
180/6 P
00-12-00
180/7 P
00-11-00
7/3 P
7/4P
00-15-00
141/ P
00-14-00
142/1 P
00-29-00
137/1 P
137/2 P
00-18-00
133/1 पी
00-18-00
133/2P
00-19-00
127/2P
127/1 P
00-11-00
97/1 P
00-33-00
97/2P
97/3 P
103/0 पी
103/12P
00-17-00
103/13 P
103/14 P
00-29-00
99/4 P
99/2 P
42/ BP
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
1
2
3
4
5
Thane Bhiwandi
183 P
Lap Budruk
182P
111/16 P 00-14-00
150/0P
00-12-00
160/0P
99/4P
99/2P
42/B P
Devali
4P
00-18-00
26/10/ 1P
26/10/2P 00-14-00-
26/12P 00-21-00
26/13P
26/14P
26/15 P
Jambhivali 38/7P
Ambernath Sakharoli River 00-19-00
21/1 P
00-45-00 Wadi
Nala
187 P
[F. No. L- 14014/12/03 -G.P.J
SWAMI SINGH, Director नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2462.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन दहेज- हजीरा उरान धाबोल पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
1 अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जम करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उम् के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिकार की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , सक्षम 5937
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2003 प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, 7 वाँ तल, बी- विंग , आरसीएफ प्रियदर्शिनी बिल्डिंग , मुम्बई -400022 ( महाराष्ट्र) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल
खसरा न.
तहसील गाँव
जिला
(हेक्टेयर में)
S.O. 2462. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Dahej - Hazira- Vran -Dhabol Pipeline Sector under, National Gas Grid Project in the State of Maharashtra , a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India ) Limited;
00-18-00
99पी
रायगढ़ पनवेल नेर
00-13-00
153/12/एपी
92पी
निताले
Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
01-18-00
138पी
103पी
87पी
00-18-00
85पी
00-11-00
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
00-12-00
4पी
00-22-00
2पी
00-14-00
चिखले
75/4एपी
75/4बीपी
00-21-00
75/3पी
00-23-00
75/2पी
00-25-00
60/10पी
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, 7th Floor , B - Wing , RCF Priyadarshini Building , Mumbai -400 022 (Maharashtra)
00-11-00
60/4पी
SCHEDULE
59/3पी
00-11-00
रेलवे
Village
District Tchsil
Servey No.
AreaAcquired (InHect) 61/4पी
5
4
1 2 3
61/15.पी
00-18-00
00-14-00
99P
61/1पी
Nere
Raigad Panvel
00-13-00
153 / 12A P 59/2पी
Nitale
92P
59/4पी
01-18-00
138P
75/3पी
103 P
75/2पी
87P
76/5 पी
00-18-00
85P
57/1 पी
विहिघर
00-11-00
00-15-00
नदी
महोदर
00-12-00
4P
63/2पी
00-22:00
2P
59 पी
00-14-00
75/4A P
Chikhale
29/5पी
चिंधण
75/4B P 27/1 पी
वावंजे
75/3 P
00-21,00 29/5पी
00-23-00
75/2P 262पी
नितलस
00-25-00
60/10 P
00-24-00
260पी.
60/4P
00-01:00
59/3 P [फाइल सं. एल-14014/12/ 03 - जी.पी. ]
00-11-00
Railway
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 5938
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
अनुसूची
Chikhale
61/4P
Raigad Panvel
जिला
गाँव
तालुक
खसरा न.
61/15 P
61/1 P
00-14-00
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयरमें) 59/2P
पॉन्डिचेरी कारैकल 37, वन्जौर 30
0.03.0 जीपी 59/4 P
27/1
0.07.5 75/3P
27/2
0.13.0 75/2 P
59/1
0.02.0 जीपी 76/5 P
59/2भाग 0.11.0 57/1 P
Vihighar
Mohodar
58/1
River
0.00.5 जीपी
00-15-00
63/2P
58/2
0.03.0 59 P
58/3
0.02.0 Chindran
58/4
29/5 P
0.01.5
58/6
0.04.5 27/1 P
Vavanje
58/7
0.03.0 29/5 P
57/2
0.01.5 Nitalas
262P
57/3
0.02.5 260P
00-24-00
57/4
0.05.5 [File No. L - 14014/ 12/03-G.P. ]
56/2
0.03.5 SWAMI SINGH , Director
56/3
0.03.5
56/4
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
0.05.5
55/2ए
55/3
0.03.0
55/4
0.02.0
0.01.5 का.आ. 2463.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पॉन्डिचेरी राज्य में केएससीएल से वेनजौर सिलिकेट गैस पाइपलाइन तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
54/1
0.08.5
54/2
0.03.5
54/3
0.02.0
50/2
0.07.5
50/3
0.01.5 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
50/5
0.06.0
41/2
0.07.0
41/3
0.02.0
41/4
0.08.0
42/3
0.12.0 अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
42/6
0.00.5 जीपी
43/4
0.11.5
43/7
0.01.0 जीपी
44/1
0.13.0
44/3
0.01.5
44/7
0.09.0
2
0.28.0 जीपी कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, कावेरी परियोजना, 19 , पेरूमल पूर्वी गली, नागापट्टिनम -611001 (तमिलनाडु ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
कुल
2.07.0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5939
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
1
2
3
2
4
5
1
3
4
5
0.35.0
पॉन्डिचेरी कारैकल 36 , केजियर 88/2
0.02.0
Pondicherry Karaikal 37 , Vanjoor 58/3
0.03.5
88/3
58/4
0.01.5 89/1
0.03.0
58/6
0.04.5 89/4
0.01.5
58/7
0.03.0 93.4
0.08.5
57/2
0.01.5 93.6
0.08.0
57.3
0.02.5 92/4
0.03.5
57/4
0.05.5 92/5
0.02.0
56/2
0.03.5
56/3
0.65.0
0.03.5 कुल
56/4
0.05.5 [फाइल सं. एल-14014/35/03-जी.पी. ]
0.05.0
55/2ए
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
55/3
0.03.0 New Delhi , the 19th August, 2003
55/4
0.02.0
0.01.5
54/1
0.08.5
54/2
0.03.5
0.02.0
54/3
S.O. 2463. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from KSCL to Vanjore Silicate Gas Pipeline in the State of Pondicherry, a pipeline withprovision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;
50/2
0.07.5
50/3
0.01.5
50/5
0.06.0
3
0.07.0
41/2
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
41/3
0.02.0
41/4
0.08.0
0.12.0
42/3
0.00.5 GP
42/6
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
43/4
0.11.5
43/Π
0.01.0 GP
0.13.0
44/1
0.01.5
44/3
0.09.0
44/7
0.28.0 GP
2
2.07.0
Total
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one-days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, Cauveri Project , 19 , Perumal East Street, Nagapattinam -611001 (Tamilnadu)
0.35.0
36,Kezhiur88/2
SCHEDULE
0.03.5
88/3
Area Acquired
0.03.0
89/1
District Taluk Village
Survey No.
(InHect)
0.01.5
89/4
4
5
2
3
1
0.08.5
39/4
0.03.0 GP
Pondi- Karaikal 37 , Vanjoor 30
93/6
0.08.0 27/1
0.07.5
cherry
0.03.5
92/4
0.13.0
27/2
92/5
0.02.0
0.02.0 GP
59/1
Total
0.65.0
0.11.0
59/2 Pt.
0.00.5 GP
58/1
0.03.0
58/2
[File No. L- 14014/35/03 -G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 5940
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3
4
5 नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
नं. 79
259/3
0-10-92
ईरोड़. पेरून्दुरै
0-39-69
259/4
अनैपालयम्
254/3
0-18-16
254/4
0-25-42
253
0-43-56- का.आ. 2464.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन कोची- कायम्कुलम- बंगलौर पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
252/3
0-04-21
252/2
0-09-28
251/4
0-07-27
268
0-06-25 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजनके लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
266/1
0-18-82
266/2
0-07-21
276/2
0-04-14
290
0-07-29
291/2
0-14-04 अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
291/1
0-36-27
289
0-03-91
288
0-40-69
287/7
0-33-73
287/6
0-07-84
287/5
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, कावेरी बेसिन, 19 , पेरूमल पूर्वी गली, नागापट्टिनम -611 001 ( तमिलनाडु ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
286/1
0-04-02
286/8
0-00-25 अनुसूची
286/7
0-01-40 गाँव
जिला तहसील
खसरा नं.
286/6
0-02-48
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में)
286/5
0-03-67 1
2
3
4
5
286/4
0-07-20 ईरोड़
1. कथनगन्नी 31
0-56-15
कन्कयाम्
286/3
0-13-50 रोड
0-04-47
286/2
0-11-82 29/3
0-21-24
3-83-14
कुल
20
0-46-36
21
0-00-46
नं. 80
110/9
19/2
पल्लावारे- 111
1-09-86
110/12
0-38-76
पालयम्
18
0-04-09
19/1
109/1
0-02-81
0-05-11 48/4
109/3
0-20-09
0-04-34 48/2
0-52-97
109/2
0-01-06 55
0-06-03
108/2
0-13-89 56
0-17-08
108/1
0-41-89
2-41-61
कुल
1-05-75
कुल 5941
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2
1
5
4
3
1
2
0-03-88
67
पेरून्दुरै
ईरोड नं.95
ईरोड़ पेरूम्बुरै
0-12-05
68/1
अग्रहारी
0-40-20
63/1
कथामगम्नी
0-26-13
63/2
0-08-11
64/1
0-00-55
64/2
0-00-86
64/3
0-02-69
27/6
0-24-09
30/12
0-03-15
30/11
0-10-68
30/13
0-05-08
30/14
0-08-16
30/9
0-22-01
30/17
0-06-42
30/3-
0-04-32
30/6
0-14-19
30/4
0-01-75
30/5
0-00-72
29/12
29/13
0-04-63
29/16
0-04-70
29/19
0-03-13
रोड
0-14-81
31/4
0-12-47
31/6
0-27-64
31/7
0-08-30
51/2
0-02-54
51/1
0-14-79
50/4
0-12-64
50/5
0-32-08
50/6
0-07-86
49/9
49/8
3-40-89
कुल
0-18-87
173/2
नं. 161
0-13-02
173/1
इछी-
0-18-42
174/1
पालयम्
0-30-40
175/2
0-11-58
175/1
0-92-29
कुल
2333GI/2003-9
5
4
3
0-20-81. 405/2
नं. 93.
0-67-86 सिरूकलन्ज़ी 422
0-42-20 420/5
0-23-47 420/4
0-10-43 421/2
0-02-38 421/1
0-19-41 419/3
0-03-83 418/1
0-45-86 418/2
0-15-79
418/3
0-10-68
417/4
0-11-71
417/5
0-01-11
429
0-06-20
446
0-00-21
445/8
0-34-56
445/7
0-21-97
445/9
0-01-10
445/5
0-15-35
452/2
0-35-87
452/1
0-23-14
453/2.
0-01-64
451/10
0-00-45
453/1
0-01-74
451/9
0-51-10
455/1
0-02-45
457/3
0-09-28
457/2
0-42-22
456/2
0-10-92
456/1
0-23-35
461/1
0-00-86
461/2
461/3
0-06-79
460
0-44-07
360/2
0-03-24
350/2
0-69-38
350/1
0-00-53
355/4
0-13-76
355/1
0-02-50
351/4
0-37-29
354/4
0-00-89
354/3
0-11-05
354/2
0-03-35
354/1
0-06-86
353
0-77-47
315 5942
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
1
5
23
4
5 नं. 93
292/7
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
0-39-54
नं. 104 128/6
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
0-14-09 सिरुकलन्जी 292/2
0-02-75
128/7
बोईपाड़ी
0-01-21 292/5
128/5
0-21-20
0-13-63
128/2
0-00-93 292/6
0-02-23
128/3
0-08-19 कुल
8-93-38
128/4
0-10-73 नं. 103
82
0-06-30
132/1
0-07-53 रोड
कुथम-
0-05-70
132/2
0-02-30 83/3
पालयम्
0-06-92
128/8
0-03-67 83/1
0-20-69
131/5
0-49-83 79/4
0-01-62
130/1
0-31-81 83/2
130/2
0-10-63 79/5
130/3
0-17-55
0-15-75
147/2
0-00-11 79/11
0-00-31
147/1
0-09-96 79/10
0-00-44
146/6
0-05-90 79/6
0-11-36
146/7
0-11-60 79/9
0-05-85
146/8
0-08-63 79/8
0-07-52
146/9
0-06-08 कार्ट ट्रेक 0-01-85
146/5
0-06-32 84/2
146/4
0-07-19
0-18-30
146/3
0-05-59 84/3
0-00-68
146/2
0-01-77 85/1
0-14-66
143/20
0-04-68 85/2
0-22-94
143/8
0-02-72 77
0-27-83
144
0-03-41 25
0-71-03
143/13
0-00-27 रोड
0-05-88
143/12
0-01-40 75/3
0-37-65
143/10
0-04-39 72
0-00-53
143/9
0-03-16 74
0-42-02
143/7
0-09-45
143/6
0-17-70 कुल
3-27-73
143/4
0-03-05 120/5
0-20-18
143/5
0-05-70 नं. 104 वोईपाडी 120/1
0-00-61
142/1
0-40-45 119/7
0-07-47
141/1
0-08-10 119/6
0-10-66
166/7
0-23-16 119/5
165
0-04-40
0-17-04
164/1
0-26-50 119/4
0-03-94
179/3
0-04-40 119/2
0-02-77
179/9
0-08-18 119/3
0-15-08
164/2
0-06-20 118/2
0-34-54
179/10
0-09-66 127/1
0-09-79
179/12
0-08-61 5943
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
1
2
1
0-02-43
393/12
0-68-21
नं.104-
180/2
नं. 104
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
0-05-37
0-00-57 250/2
बोईपाडी
393/14
वोईपाडी
0-03-67
250/1
0-04-57
393/23
0-19-25
251/1
393/18
0-20-40
251/2
0-00-86
0-03-48
393/19
0-04-93
249
0-03-49
393/20
0-31-34
248
0-07-07
393/21
003-87
210
0-02-60
393/22
0-25-27
211/4
396/16
0-01-35
0-01-04
202
0-10-17
396/19
0-25-00
211/3
0-00-15
396/18
0-12-28
211/2
0-32-04
0-26-32
215/1
392
0-00-35
0-45-65 215/3
388
0-09-01
214/1
0-03-40
389/5
0-19-78
218/1
0-05-68
389/6
0-47-92
244/2
0-10-38
389/12
0-56-65
243
0-04-13
382/5
0-19-65
242/1
0-05-07
382/4
0-20-05
242/2
0-03-03
382/9
0-19-17
241
382/3
0-06-61
238
0-09-86
382/11
0-51-62
0-10-94 281/4
0-01-30
382/10
0-05-96
281/2
0-04-28
382/15
281/3
0-30-88
282/3
0-11-83
382/12
282/1
0-15-41
0-12-48
382/13
0-02-19
282/2
0-09-83
382/14
0-09-48
408/11
0-03488
433
0-00-53
408/12
432
0-10-82
408/10
0-20-60
435/8
0-05-31
408/4
0-02-51
435/7
0-08-42
408/2
0-05-75
435/6
0-03-80
407/19
0-07-53
435/5
408/3
0-07-93
435/4
0-03-31
395
0-07-27
435/3
0-15-03
409
438/1
0-10-31
394/1
0-26-80
0-01-39
0-1501
393/5
438/2
0-03-37
393/6
0-22-76
438/7
0-03-48
394/2
15-31-44
कुल
0-06-35
393/9
0-29-01
52/2
नं. 115
393/8
0-21-46
52/3
0-05-46
मुकासी
393/10
0-01-24
52/1
0-06-21
393/13
पिडरियूर 5944
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
1
2
2
3
3
5
4
4
नं. 115
53/1
0-03-52
नं. 115
13/14
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
0-07-91
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
53/7
15/1
0-23-31 मुकासी
मुकासी
51/9
0-00-41
12
0-00-12 पिडिरियूर
पिडिरिपूर
318
0-00-41 51/10
0-03-96
317
0-05-11 51/12
0-09-40
319/1
0-22-62 51/13
0-12-31
319/3
0-15-27 56
0-74-74
319/5
0-02-54 57
0-01-64
319/2
0-04-51
322/5
43/12
0-09-55
0-05-03
322/4
0-08-54 42/1
0-01-11
322/6
0-05-95 42/4
0-11-57
322/3
0-15-19 42/3
0-03-89
322/2
0-17-18 42/2
322/1
0-03-84 42/6
0-00-74
323/2
0-06-38
323/3
0-02-70 42/5
0-11-45
323/4
0-02-45 41/5
0-01-34
323/5
0-15-11 42/10
0-00-52
323/9
0-08-56 41/16
0-07-66
323/8
0-08-61 41/17
0-09-90
323/7
0-02-61
324/7
0-01-27 41/15
0-10-84
324/6
0-12-50 41/18
0-00-29
324/4
0-05-92 41/11
0-03-35
324/5
0-05-90 41/14
0-06-72
324/3
0-08-63 37/1
0-22-54
324/1
37/2
324/2
0-00-66
0-04-96
327/2
0-01-40 39/3
0-05-48
327/3
39/2
0-01-43
327/1
0-10-26 38
0-00-45
327/10
0-12-34
0-54-51
327/11
0-04-02 13/1
0-02-85
327/14
0-05-96
327/15
0-06-14 13/8
0-00-73
327/16
0-04-93 13/9
328/1
0-12-73 13/7
0-07-69
328/5
0-06-39 13/4
0-00-61
328/6
0-07-40 13/5
0-00-55
328/7
0-09-01
328/13
13/11
0-02-64
0-10-17
328/14
0-02-63 13/12
0-03-84
330
0-03-52 13/18
0-00-72
385
0-02-77 13/17
0-00-36
388/7
0-08-37 13/13
0-05-07
388/6
0-27-20 13/15
388/5
0-00-87 5945
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5
4
3
2
5
1
4
3
2
1
0-09-55
179
नं.117/2
0-19-26
388/9
पेरून्दुरै
ईरोड़
नं.115
ईरोड़ पेरून्दुरै
0-15-80
174/3
चेन्नी-
0-13-93
388/4
इंगूर
0-23-25
175
मलई
0-06-97
387
0-05-82
0-23-39
178
403
0-16-32
402/1
0-29-68
182/1
000-33
405
0-03-22
229
7-90-49
0-20-23 कुल
182/2
0-13-05
228/1 नं.114
0-00-58
668/4
इंगूर
0-03-31
183/1B
0-25-29
668/7
0-13-1
228/8
0-08-43
700
0-11-75
228/15
0-41-24
701
0-05-33
183/4
0-45-78
702
0-67-40
0-13-29
703
183/6
0-08-47
705
0-04-43
184
0-29-12
706/1
0-17-03
224/1
0-42-44
706/3
0-07-86
224/4
0-20-54
707/8
0-16-11
185/2
0-18-07
707/12
0-28-71
0-11-74
708/5
185/3
0-08-15
708/6
0-24-82
223/1
0-04-14
708/4
0-03-73
186/2
0-02-95
708/3
0-04-05
186/5
0-04-07
708/9
0-18-20
186/3
0-03-28
708/11
0-02-86
0-17-46
186/4
1067/1
0-03-39
1067/2
186/9
0-39-12
1067/3
0-29-05
186/8
0-13-23
1068/2
0-05-18
186/10
0-53-28
1068/1
0-08-48
186/11
0-03-81
1056/1
0-05-52
186/12
4-71-98
कुल
186/13
0-05-14
259
नं. 117/2
0-04-07
0-24-16
0-05-66
186/14
258/2
चेन्नी-
0-16-82
258/1
0-05-71 मलई
186/15
0-20-72
257/1
0-05-81
186/16
0-02-34
164
0-08-34
186/17
0-25-31
168/2
0-06-36
189
0-13-06
168/3
0-24-46
0-23-64
117/1
168/1
0-02-87
0-39-32
169/1
117/2
0-32-41
169/2
0-26-06
116
0-29-95
171/5
6-97-75
0-03-61
कुल
175/4
0-28-11
170/1 5946
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 ईरोड़
नं. 1094
पेरून्दुरै
878/3C
0-24-37
नं. 53.
ईरोड़
95
ईरोड़
0-05-03 879/1
वडमुगम्
0-22-05
अवल-
94
0-04-35 879/2
वेल्लौड़
0-02-05
93
पुन्डुरै
0-10-32 880/3
0-55-80
92
0-13-58 886
0-05-56
91
0-29-63 887/1
0-26-76
90
0-37-67 887/2
0-23-42
88
0-06-40 888
0-25-46
75
0-17-89 890/6
0-15-30
87
0-01-19 कुल
2-00-77
76
0-42-52 नं.46
711
ईरोड़ ईरोड़
79
0-25-91
0-06-60 पुडुर
712
0-48-07
80
0-44-51 703
62
0-42-72
0-05-68 702
81
0-43-43
0-01-77 701
59
0-03-89
0-00-58
60
694
0-28-05
0-31-08 693
57
0-00-47
0-43-04
58
696
0-02-95
0-04-21
54
698
0-03-49
0-04-79
56
0-45-08 कुल
2-44-11
55
0-29-90 ईरोड ईरोड
नं.48.
643
0-41-71
42
0-03-57 633
तुय्यम्
0-65-03
43
0-31-62 631
0-04-53
44
0-23-13 634
0-20-20
45
0-31-19 636
0-13-19
25
0-38-08 640
0-03-37
24
0-19-81 638
0-46-80
20
637
0-00-23
201
0-46-91 639
0-46-06
203
0-13-08 619
0-42-22
202
0-43-60 620
0-31-27
224
0-01-02 594
0-62-09
225
0-39-78 595
0-60-45
229
0-03-68 596
0-08-40
229
0-53-91 598
0-50-41
230
0-12-49 601
0-04-09
231
0-18-14 603
0-22-87
232
0-03-33 533
258
0-61-34
0-21-93
245
530
0-17-37
0-37-55
252
0-00-13
6-01-63
कुल
246
0-29-32 :
5947
भारत का राजपत्र अगसः 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
1
2
3
5
1
3
2
532
नं..47
0-20-94 नं.53
247
0-14-01 ईरोड़ ईरोड़
ईरोड़
ईरोड़
0-34-25
241
अवलपुन्डुरै
0-34-75-
मोडवन्डी 534
243
0-00-57
0-02-83
535
सत्यमन्नगलम्
242
0-05-22
239
10-86-47
0-33-61
कुल
9-00-72
कुल
17
0-76-40
नं. 45 नन्जई
0-37-01
16
0-07-31 नं..47. 204
उत्तुकुली
0-28-67
मोडवन्डी 205
0-54-93
19
0-01-26
सत्थमन्गलम् 203
32.
0-32-12 206
0-20-82
31
0-04-67
210
0-04-10 209
0-01-21
0-04-75
30
0-52-86
238
33
0-55-47
0-30-27
237
29
0-00-18
0-09-73
235
0-54-95
234
0-35-00
37
0-21-99
230
0-56-26
36
231
0-32-64
0-18-43
40
0-28-29
226
478
0-04-14
0-03-94
97
477
0-49-55
0-66-97
95
0-14-72
480
0-04-79
94
482
0-31-65
0-32-57 483
0-09-31
85
484
0-46-07
86
0-00-36
492
84
0-37-03 473
0-04-95
0-07-54
0-57-05
494
112
0-62-15
495
0-05-33
113
462
0-14-72
0-02-64
79
461
0-20-68
0-06-46
114
0-14-22
460
0-08-21
459
0-77-12
78
0-12-98
458
0-50-33
76
0-46-36
455
0-71-91
141
0-08-95
446
0-28-06
449
142
0-05-22
448
0-44-62
140
0-30-47
441
0-56-53
155
0-29-73
442
0-54-40
432
0-00-34
154
0-23-90
436
0-05-54
156
0-38-95
435
167
0-00-18
0-03-78
405
0-39-57
404
0-13-17
153
0-20-80
402
0-51-61
152
0-17-52
403
0-05-11
530
8-84-17
कुल 5948
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
4
3
5 नं. 43
ईरोड़ ईरोड़
नमक्कल तिरूचेन्गोड नं . 35
2
सतमंबूर
वरगुरम-
3
0-17-81
119
पट्टी
0-52-01 9
0-07-04
118
0-46-62 8
0-07-90
120
0-01-27 7
0-23-63
117
0-39-39 13
0-16-86
16
112
0-13-16
0-44-26 15
0-25-49
106
0-41-92 14
0-00-35
105
0-00-36 22
0-40-31
107
0-50-62 21
0-30-14
108
0-17-69 25
0-29-21
103
0-09-60 26
0-02-38
109
0-52-30 27
0-09-90
21
0-07-51
2-32-18
कुल
11
0-17-05 नं. 19
नमक्कल तिरूचेन्गोड
12
0-28-26 पाप्पम्-
13
0-38-13 219
0-05-70
पालयम्
8
0-67-50 220
0-73-28
5
0-10-41 226
0-56-28
32
0-33-34
1-35-26
कुल
33
0-66-06 नं. 29
34
0-01-06 थोक्कावडी
35
0-62-65 कवुन्डम्
36
0-34-30 148
0-18-19
पालयम्
37
0-30-54 155
0-85-19
57
0-33-88 154
0-05-80
153
39
0-45-71
0-23-55
कुल
1-32-73
8-32-44
कुल
नं. 30
नं. 31
285
तोकावडी
0-74-41
देवनान-
286
0-30-37
122
0-39-77
कुरीची
288
0-79-97
123
0-31-97 290
0-34-52
129
0-41-29 292
0-52-51
128
0-36-98 303
0-35-44
139
302
0-47-75
0-28-91 297
0-12-88
140
0-59-48 301
0-25-10
144
0-00-49 300
0-62-41
143
0-55-36 182
0-11-02
160
0-45-64 183
0-81-14
162
0-36-77 167
0-20-57
163
168
0-04-73
0-04-95
169
271
0-18-31
0-01-50 170
0-21-39
217
0-08-37
6-12-74
218
कुल
0-48-94 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
5949
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 नं. 31
नमक्कल तिरूचेन्गोड
नमक्कल तिरूचेन्गोड नं. 28
देवनान-
14
ईमपल्ली
0-34-17 216
0-05-03
कुरीची
13
0-33-43 212
0-53-71
15
0-17-23 236
0-03-91
16
0-91-78 211
40
0-05-51 207
0-45-42
41
0-32-02
5-92-71
कुल
4-56-52
कुल
नं. 32.
सेलम सन्कारी नं. 21
करूप्पम-
मोरूर
288
0-56-51 243
0-67-12
पट्टी
287
0-04-75 242
0-27-31
289
0-54-97 241
0-33-67
290
0-73-90
0-02-70
244
291
0-04-81 228
0-47-86
292
0-47-00 227
0-47-88
0-49-35
298
226
0-19-96
299
0-54-29
0-05-62
264
337
0-63-24 224
0-00-72
265
338
0-10-07
0-55-24
266
514
0-43-39
0-41-28
271
0-38-16
513
0-55-54 272
0-37-95
516
0-33-78 207
0-21-85
512
0-07-40 284
0-00-37
511
0-24-15 206
0-73-71
509
0-27-52
0-46-68
203
506
0-60-29 285
0-02-88
448
0-77-97 200
0-49-07
449
0-44-87 286
0-52-43
450
0-16-18 293
0-20-58
457
0-18-71 298
0-61-51
456
0-33-82 299
0-48-99
301
0-41-24
8-62-51
कुल
8-44-78
नं. 22
कुल
1-04-49
कस्तूरीपट्टी 179
नं. 28
182
0-45-22
0-56-65
136
ईमपल्ली
0-87-62
183
0-00-18
135
0-49-39
184
5
0-08-62
118
6
0-38-54
0-28-93
1-29-57
198
0-60-26
9
3
0-13-24
0-22-81
199
10
0-26-17
197
0-19-23
0-48-33
11
200
0-52-74 2333G1/2003-10 5950
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
1
5
2
4
3
5 सेलम सन्कारी नं. 22
सेलम सन्कारी नं. 17
0-05-11
201
कस्तूरीपट्टी
अंवरंग-
97
0-42-65
49
पालेयम्
0-58-62 98
51
0-44-48
0-17-89
48
83
0-01-06
0-29-64
52
0-03-92 82
0-63-15
44
0-44-77 81
0-62-04
8
0-10-13 88
0-48-97
0-37-15 66
0-00-49
22
0-34-68 64
0-20-30
21
0-55-23 65
24
0-33-08
0-16-97
25
56
0-14-76
0-30-17
28
0-73-77 54
0-19-04
27
0-38-05 55
0-41-56
7-07-00
कुल
44
0-29-92
नं. 31
45
0-46-82
490
37
0-54-57
वैकुन्ठ्म्
0-09-38
489
0-34-64 39
0-12-77
485
0-33-70 36
0-93-71
486
0-30-97
11-82-89
कुल
450
0-01-04
449
0-45-23 नं. 18
452
0-52-12 अईवेली 126
0-63-29
454
0-52-04- 137
0-08-71
455
0-79-03 136
0-27-98
456
0-00-17 135
57
0-53-30
0-11-17 138
58
0-99-06
0-08-78
61
134
0-57-94
59
0-17-13 139
0-69-48
82
0-06-89 140
0-00-34
84
0-30-45 83
0-11-86
81
0-31-00 84
0-63-03
85
0-20-30 85
80
0-07-58
0-27-02
86
82
0-21-54
0-03-39
89
0-04-70 81
0-04-50
93
0-28-15 71
0-50-36
94
0-64-26 72
0-41-80
95
0-22-81 68
0-40-32
98
0-54-26 67
97
0-25-50
0-06-52 64
141
0-35-74
0-50-03
140
0-57-23 65
0-59-36
143
0-03-03 56
0-97-95
139
0-32-64 57
0-00-29
138
0-05-76 54
0-19-48
137
0-05-37
7-50-98
कुल
9-82-93
कुल [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
5951 1
3
4
1
2
5
3
4
5 सेलम सत्करी नं. 15
सेलम सन्करी
0-00-97
172
नं. 40 पुडुर
ओलषक-
171
0-52-58 चिन्नाम्नूर 143
0-02-40
168
0-78-60 142
0-12-76
166
0-17-53 141
0-26-22
165
0-06-75 139
0-13-02
161
140
0-03-81
0-15-01
126
163
0-82-05
0-66-70 118
0-42-92
162
0-26-56 119
0-32-98
145
0-48-60 120
0-58-63
146
0-46-75 कुल
3-85-99
148
0-73-73 नं. 37अग्र-
149
0-43-88
0-63-45
हारथालयूर 89
23
0-36-08 91
0-52-92
27
0-40-36 92
0-22-94
24
0-51-26 93
0-26-64
7
0-01-24 कुल
1-65-95
6
0-34-36 नं. 39
1
0-60-07 कन्नदेरी 216
0-54-62
2
0-08-47 217
0-12-76
215
0-77-10
कुल
6-98-30 208
0-41-53
नं. 41
209
0-37-48
218
0-41-12
इगपुरम्
197
0-59-28
236
226
0-06-11
0-24-47 196
0-45-95
219
0-00-28 237
0-56-66
225
0-98-47 238
0-49-35
229
0-63-38 156
0-55-73
230
0-07-30 158
0-80-78
231
157
0-26-01
0-00-43
159
199
0-02-17
0-98-43 125
0-16-58
198
0-40-88 124
0-31-24
197
0-11-90 160
0-42-98
188
0-63-33 114
0-22-47
189
0-08-23 115
0-65-26
133
0-41-36 112
0-49-52
110
0-37-54
134
0-35-79 107
0-05-70
132
0-07-05 99
0-24-47
135
0-51-93 97
0-90-54
1352/131
0-10-48 95
0-45-21
131
0-16-02 94
0-41-21
1312/130
0-04-50
10-52-67
कुल
130
0-25-71 5952
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 सन्करी
0-50-65 सेलम
नं. 41
129
सेलम
128
0-14-89 इगपुरम्
127
0-22-50
0-20-16
69
70
0-41-49
72
0-25-35
75
0-37-74
74
0-54-60
81
0-04-50
83
0-48-99
84
0-66-63
86
0-01-23
87
0-34-75
11-00-12
कुल
नं. 16.
वेटुकडु-
0-33-27 पत्ती
41
42
0-24-26
44
0-32-32
45
0-60-57
46
0-04-13
0-19-47
47
52
0-53-44
2-27-46
कुल
इडपडी नं. 20.
कच्छी-
0-54-89 पतली
120
121
0-17-63
119
0-33-03
0-28-90
118
117
0-19-11
1-53-56
कुल
नं. 13
ओमल्लूर
0-45-38 माराकोटाई 32
31
38
0-62-28
37
0-62-81
36
0-22-74
42
0-42-63
44
0-36-33
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
5 2
3
4
45
0-27-68 ओमल्लूर नं. 13
46
माराकोटाई
0-02-91
47
0-30-19
460
0-02-88
70
0-55-70
0-24-82
71
69
0-07-16
72
0-37-70
74
0-71-87
13
0-38-69
0-40-44
14
16
0-06-99
12
0-38-37
17
0-92-24
7-49-91
कुल
नं. 11
345
0-44-80 गुन्डूक्कल
381
0-00-91
0-74-88
346
348
0-20-57
313
312
0-52-34
315
0-97-14
316
0-06-35
0-28-56
318
317
0-16-88
0-17-12
319
320
0-03-54
321
0-40-43
326
0-37-68
0-71-48
166
0-27-46
165
167
0-15-83
0-27-28
159
160
0-32-49
157
0-67-46
144
0-81-03
0-03-67
0-67-07
141
88
0-52-81
140
0-01-14 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5953
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 नं. 11
0-02-70
नं. 3 दलवाव 571
सेलम ओमल्लूर
0-13-90
धर्मपुरी धर्मपुरी
89
0-27-26
572
हल्ली
0-03-39 गुन्ड्ररक्ल
90
0-79-54
573
0-3992
71
0-60-06
574
0-51-61
1
69
578
0-71-87
0-11-99
579
68
0-52-28
0-23-34
560
0-63-13
98
0-36-06
559
0-13-09
104
0-76-43
557
0-23-78
105
0-19-41
106
0-82-71
4-84-96
कुल
107
0-01-45
563
नं. 1.
0-56-98
119
0-08-32
425
पालवाडी
0-55-96
120
0-09-24
565
0-03-76
568
0-14-06
13-87-41
कुल
424
0-51-88 नं. 14
569
0-38-19 42
0-65-78
मुक्कनूर
570
0-31-88 44
0-52-02
572
0-16-14 43
0-12-24
571
0-73-62 45
0-58-94
408
0-10-01
37
125
0-04-53
32
0-49-24
126
0-24-08
31
0-23-78
127
0-26-19
33
0-16-07
128
0-31-93
7
0-90-47
140
0-23-90
30
0-01-47
130
0-05-24
6
0-45-86
131
0-00-77
9
0-44-27
132
0-25-36
4
0-40-83
133
0-11-59
3
0-74-72
134
0-14-64
0-02-48
2
598
0-00-19
597
0-06-72
5-88-18
कुल
0-30-46
594
नं. 3.
धर्मपुरी धर्मपुरी
593
0-14-81 दलवाव-
589
0-01-68
0-07-35
627
हल्ली
591
0-29-31 623
0-40-56
590
0-18-03
626
0-40-17
585
0-18-01 617
0-31-61
584
0-26-51 615
0-41-38
583
0-06-30
594
0-29-46
6-63-12
कुल
592
0-21-34 5954
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1 नं. 12.
धर्मपुरी धर्मपुरी
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5 नं. 15 569
0-22-44
धर्मपुरी धर्मपुरी
806
नत्तघल्ली
0-58-43
805
0-01-30
807
0-57-56
809
0-14-03
813
0-23-63
814
0-78-11
817
0-78-60
226
0-48-23
834
0-48-15
835
0-65-01
741
0-79-06
829
0-08-23
830
0-32-50
204
0-03-18
203
1-12-23
202
0-16-00
201
0-22-84
198
0-07-01
197
0-46-66
199
0-44-68
178
0-02-28
176
0-02-12
177
0-31-82
0-13-07
174
173
0-09-22
171
0-29-02
170
0-15-05
0-12-37
164
168
10-08-24
165
0-03-17
166
0-04-21
167
0-15-86
828
0-06-31
0-01-87
827
76,140
0-37-31
743
0-76-30
77
0-48-03
84
0-38-03
80
(0-45-21
81
0-31-83
23
0-37-58
21
0-27-36
20
(0-17-09
19
0-04-12
18
0-48-33
14-11-24
कुल
इलगिरी 571
0-15-22
570
0-00-79
573
0-18-37
574
0-11-40
576
0-19-83
577
0-21-24
581
0-22-75
584
0-06-80
583
0-24-29
589
0-26-03
590
150
0-97-31
116
0-24-02
114
0-17-66
109
0-13-74
108
0-03-79
102
0-04-58
106
0-17-89
104
0-15-03
506
0-15-18
508
0-09-75
507
0-25-69
51.1
505
0-41-81
512
(0-45-40
502
0-05-61
496
0-18-24
497
0-06-33
4
0-37-492
3
0-15-47
1
0-10-98
2
0-24-08
477
0-13-14
476
0-30-64
438
0-26-24
437
0-26-88
450
0-00-76
436
0-42-76
347
0-23-45
346
0-50-45
331
0-54-30
411
0-15-10
412
0-25-96
413
0-27-28
403
0-16-07
414
11-404-42
कुल [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
5955 1
2
3
4
1
5
2
3
4
5 नं. 22.
धर्मपुरी धर्मपुरी
761
0-39-25
3/2
धर्मपुरी पेन्नागरम्
0-06-88
नं. 5
बहलाहतली 763
0-04-11
माडेहल्ली 3/1
0-24-19
कुल
0-43-36
2/8
0-14-62 नं. 6
धर्मैपुरी पेन्नगरम्
481
0-10-20
2/7
0-12-98 ओनप्पा- 440/1C
0-17-30
2/6
0-00-44 गेन्डानाहतली: 440/1B
0-17-91
241/1
0-15-89
440/1D
240/4
0-04-10
440/1A
0-03-43
239/1
0-64-49
418/1
0-05-90
238/1
419
0-04-03
0-24-82
241/1
420
0-30-72
0-16-34
410
0-00-28
237/5
0-01-89
422/5
0-11-44
237/4
0-05-65
422/4
0-01-89
236/12
0-09-97
421/1
0-00-51
236/11
0-09-56
433/ 1H
0-02-28
236/9
0-11-09
433/1G
0-04-58
236/7
0-11-73
422/3
0-00-28
236/5
423/6
0-05-66
433/ 1E
0-00-99
236/3
433/ 1D
0-05-16
236/4
0-12-01
433/ 1A
0-03-10
236/1
0-10-26
433/1C
0-01-06
235/13
0-30-39
433/1B
0-07-33
235/12
0-12-77
432/5
235/8
432/6
0-33-62
0-05-06
235/7
432/3
0-09-87
0-02-87
432/2
0-11-90
235/6
0-17-54
432/1
0-08-36
247/9
0-02-73
429/10
0-07-08
247/8
0-13-01
429/9
0-05-05
247/6
0-11-67
425/ 1B
0-00-48
247/5
0-15-16
429/8
0-04-95
247/4
429/7
0-02-05
0-02-54
429/6
247/3
0-01-29
0-04-47
426/2
0-00-99
246/1
0-20-40
429/5
0-01-70
183
0-05-36
429/4
0-00-46
186/2
0-16-21
429/1
0-00-68
184
0-46-20
426/1
0-18-55
179
0-61-69 427/2
0-05-85
178/1
0-14-27 427/1D
0-01-03
427/ 1A
176/6
0-05-95
0-13-91 427/1B
0-08-28
176/5
0-02-01 कुल
2-35-77
176/2
0-15-28 5956
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
1
5
2
3
4
2
1 नं. 5 मादेहतली 176/1
0-16-65
धर्मपुरी पेन्नगरम्
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 3
5
4
03
483/4एन
धर्मपुरी पेन्नगरम्
175/15
175/14
0-04-27
175/11
0-07-97
175/8
0-08-72
0-04-71
175/5
175/4
0-04-66
175/2
0-11-59
175/3
0-05-98
6-68-42
कुल
नं. 04
426/2सी
0-11-15
पापरापट्टी
426/2बी
0-00-49
0-00-97
426/2ए
0-06-09
426/1ए
425/3बी
0-07-93
0-11-20
425/3ए
427
0-00-45
0-05-36
425/2
424
0-07-60
415/9
0-14-17
415/6
0-02-57
415/8
0-05-93
415/7
0-10-70
415/3
0-02-10
0-09-68
415/4
0-12-68
415/1
410/3
0-21-87
0-17-67
410/2
411/5
0-05-58
411/4
0-19-13
0-04-05
411/3
402/4
0-33-31
0-05-45
402/5
402/3सी
0-01-77
0-11-75
402/3बी
0-06-73
402/3ए
0-08-89
402/2
0-03-83
401
403
0-01-26
2-50-36
कुल
0-01-46
483/4जे
0-08-98 पनैिकुलम्
0-07-20
483/4आई
0-07-13
483/4एच
483/4डी
0-08-83
483/4सी 0-08-47
0-07-76
483/4बी
0-09-16
483/4ए
0-11-33
484/5बी
484/6
0-05-76
480/3
0-06-76
480/2
0-32-52
0-07-05
478/13
478/12
0-05-98
478/11
0-05-54
478/10
0-04-33
478/9
0-03-98
478/1
0-04-96
0-00-34
479/5
479/4
0-02-45
0-09-39
479/3
0-11-81
475/13ए
475/12
0-12-27
475/11
0-10-68
0-14-54
475/10ए
0-06-22
474/11
474/10
0-03-88
474/8
0-14-77
474/2
472/5
0-28-67
0-06-74
473
0-02-93
208/2बी
0-15-71
208/2सी
208/2डी 0-00-46
208/1
0-11-41
0-00-13
208/2ए
192/5
0-20-36
193
0-05-19
(0-12-69
192/4
192/3
0-05-67
0-12-44
192/2 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925 1
3
4
2
5
1
2
0-10-31
192/1
नं. 3 पानैकुलम
धर्मपुरी पेन्नगरम् धर्मपुरी पेन्नगरम्
78/2
0-41-66
0-01-19
77/4सी
77/4बी
0-01-68
0-02-89
77/4ए
0-03-56
77/5बी
0-01-45
77/3सी
77/3बी
0-12-93
77/1बी
0-17-77
74/6सी
0-15-18
0-04-11
74/6बी
0-06-80
74/6ए
0-00-65
74/4ए
74/3बी
0-02-77
74/2
0-10-99
0-02-81
74/3ए
74/1
0-07-48
0-03-22
75/3बी
0-10-24
75/3ए
0-13-24
75/2ए
0-03-02
75/1
0-13-44
51/4
0-13-27
51/3
0-01-92
51/2
0-16-32
51/7
0-06-75
51/1
0-00-29
51/6
0-45-81
50/2
0-16-33
50/1
0-14-45
49/3
0-13-17
43
0-25-65
41/2ए
41/1डी
0-12-75
0-08-96
41/1सी
0-13-13
33/9
0-27-15
33/8
0-07-96
33/4
0-01-21
33/7
0-00-46
33/6
0-14-96
33/5
0-10-71
33/1
0-36-46
32/1 ए
0-18-25
29
8-65-30
कुल
2333 Gl/2003-11
5957
4
5 3
58/3सी
041-85 नं. 3
0-03-09 कारैबयनाहतली 58/3बी
58/2
0-30-36
58/1डी
0-01-84
57/1सी
0-01-13
0-06-43
57/1बी
47/5
0-46-16
0-30-06
47/4
47/3
0-11-13
0-10-03
51/3
0-04-57
51/6
48/11
0-11-26
48/7
0-16-66
0-00-55
51/3
0-07-59
48/6
0-05-94
48/5
0-28-63
50/2सी
49/5ई
0-01-43
0-04-89
31/6
0-02-29
49/5डी
0-03-13
49/5सी
0-04-69
49/5बी
0-01-52
31/5
0-02-09
49/5ए
0-20-30
49/4
32/1पी2
0-08-37
0-41-20
32/2
38/1 ई 0-02-46
38/1सी 0-02-06
0-01-33
32/ 1पी1
0-08-97
37/2एच
0-13-50
37/2ई
0-09-38
37/2डी
0-04-29
37/2सी
0-04-46
37/2बी
0-03-50
37/2ए
0-22-92
36/3
0-01-59
35/4डी
0-16-81
35/3
0-00-13
35/4एफ
0-01-52
35/4ए
0-01-52
35/1
4-42-63
कुल 5958
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
1
3
2
4
5 धर्मपुरी पेननगगरम् नं. 7
28
वेलमपट्टी
27
0-30-94
26
0-38-35
20
0-08-68
19
0-44-31
18
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 ofthe said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, Cauveri Basin, 19, Perumal East Street , Nagapattinam-611001 (Tamil Nadu).
SCHEDULE
District Taluk
0-76-84
1-99-22
कुल
78
नोमलहल्ली
धर्मपुरी पालकोड
0-09-14
1
77
0-35-83
76
0-41-79
74
0-34-06
72
0-52-72
73
0-24-53
71
0-25-35
70
0-55-23
68
0-18-52
69
0-54-58
64
0-05-42
63
0-79-13
62
0-04-81
61
0-15-53
4-56-64
कुल
[फा. सं. एल-14014/26/03-जी.पी. ]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक New Delhi , the 19th August , 2003
S.O. 2464. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Kochi- Kayamkulam -Bangalore Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Tamil Nadu , a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act. 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declarcs its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one-days from the date Village
No. Survey Area Hect./ Are./Sq. Metre 2
3
4
5
0-56-15
Erode Kankayam 1. Kathan- 31 ganni
0-04-47
29/3
0-21-24
20
0-46-36
21
0-00-46
19/2
1-09-86
18
0-04-09
19/1
0-02-81
48/4
0-20-09
48/2
0-52-97
55
0-06-03
56
0-17-08
TOTAL
2-41-61
259/3
0-10-92
Erode Perundurai No. 79 . Anaippala- yam
259/4
0-39-69
254/3
0-18-16
0-25-42
254/4
253
0-43-56
252/3
0-04-21
252/2
0-09-28
251/4
0-07-27
268
0-06-25
266/1
0-18-82
266/2
0-07-21
276/2
0-04-14
290
0-07-29
291/2
0-14-04
291/1
0-36-27
289
0-03-91
288
0-40-69
287/7
0-33-73
287/6
0-07-84 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5959
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
1
2
3
4
1
2
5
3
4
5 287/5
No. 95
Erode Perundurai
No. 79 .
Erode Perundurai
Asphallted
0-03-13
0-04-02
Road
Anaippalayam 286/1
Kathanganni
286/8
0-00-25
31/4
0-14-81 286/7
0-01-40
31/6
0-12-47 286/6
0-02-48
31/7
0-27-64 286/5
0-03-67
51/2
0-08-30 286/4
0-07-20
51/1
0-02-54
50/4
286/3
0-13-50
0-14-75
50/5
286/2
0-12-64
0-11-82
50/6
0-32-08 TOTAL
3-83-14
49/4
0-07-86 No.80.
49/8
Pallavara-
TOTAL 110/9
3-40-89 yanpalayam
111
No. 94.
0-38-76
110/2
Itchi-
173/2
0-18-87
palayam
109/1
0-05-11
173/1
0-13-02 109/3
0-04-34
174/1
0-18-42 109/2
0-01-06
175/2
0-30-40 108/2
0-13-89
175/1
0-11-58 108/1
0-41-89
TOTAL
0-92-29 TOTAL
1-05-75
No. 93 .
No.95.
Sirukkalanji 406/pt Agrahara
405/2
0-20-81
0-03-88
Kathanganni 67
422
0-67-86
0-12-05
68/1
420/5
0-42-20 63/1
0-40-20
420/4
0-23-47 63/2
0-26-13
421/2
0-10-43 64/1
0-08-11
421/1
0-02-38 64/2
0-00-55
419/3
0-19-41 64/3
0-00-86
418/1
0-03-83 27/6
0-02-69
418/2
0-45-86
0-24-09
30/12
418/3
0-15-79 30/11
0-03-15
417/4
0-10-68 30/13
0-10-68
417/5
0-11-71
0-05-08
30/14
429
0-01-11
0-08-16
30/9
446
0-06-20 30/7
0-22-01
0-00-21
445/8
0-06-42
30/3
445/7
0-34-56 30/6
0-04-32
445/9
0-21-97 30/4
0-14-19
445/5
0-01-10 30/5
0-01-75
452/2
0-15-35 29/12
0-00-72
452/1
0-35-87 29/13
453/2
0-23-14 29/16
0-04-63
451/10
0-01-64
0-04-70
29/15
453/1
0-00-45 5960
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )] 3
5
2
3
5
4
1
2
4
1
0-14-66
0-01-74
451/9
85/1
Perundurai No. 93.
Erode
Erode Perundurai No. 103
0-22-94
85/2
0-51-10
Kutham-
455/1
Sirukkalanji
77
0-27-83
palayam
457/3
0-02-45
0-71-03
25
0-09-28
457/2
Asphalted
0-42-22
456/2
0-05-88
Road
0-10-92
456/1
0-37-65
75/3
0-23-35
461/1
72
0-00-53
0-00-86
461/2
74
0-42-02 461/3
3-27-73
TOTAL
460
0-06-79
120/5
0-20-18 360/2
0-44-07
No. 104
0-00-61
120/1
Voipady
0-03-24
350/2
119/7
0-07-47 350/1
0-69-38
119/6
0-10-66 355/4
0-00-53
0-17-04
119/5
355/1
0-13-76
0-03-94
119/4
0-02-50
351/4
0-02-77
119/2
354/4
0-37-29
0-15-08
119/3
0-00-89
354/3
0-34-54
118/2
354/2
0-11-05
0-09-79
127/1
0-03-35
354/1
128/6
0-14-09
0-06-86
353
0-01-21
128/7
315
0-77-47
0-21-20
128/5
292/7
0-39-54
128/2
0-00-93 292/2
0-02-75
0-08-19
128/3
292/5
0-13-63
0-10-73
128/4
292/6
0-02-23
0-07-53
132/1
TOTAL
8-93-38
0-02-30
132/2
82
128/8
0-03-67
0-06-30
No. 103
Asphalted
131/5
0-49-83 Road
0-05-70
Kutham- palayam
0-31-81
130/1
83/3
0-06-92
0-10-63
130/2
0-20-69
83/1
0-15-75
130/3
79/4
0-01-62
0-00-11
147/2
83/2
147/1
0-09-96
0-17-55
79/5
146/6
0-05-90
0-00-31
79/11
146/7
0-11-60 79/10
0-00-44
0-08-63
146/8
0-11-36
79/6 .
146/9
0-06-08
0-05-85
19/9
0-06-32
146/5
79/8
0-07-52
0-07-19
146/4
CartTrack 6-01-85
146/3
0-05-59
0-18-30
84/2
146/2
0-01-77
0-00-68
84/3
0-04-68
143/20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
5961 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Erode Perundurai No. 104
Erode Perundurai No. 104 282/3
0-30-88 143/8
0-02-72
Voipady
282/1
0-15-41
Voipady
144
0-03-41
282/2
0-02-19 143/13
0-00-27
408/11
0-09-48 143/12
0-01-40
408/12
0-00-53 143/10
0-04-39
408/10
0-10-82 143/9
0-03-16
408/4
0-05-31 143/7
0-09-45
408/2
0-08-42 143/6
0-17-70
407/19
0-03-80 143/4
0-03-05
408/3
143/5
0-05-70
395
0-03-31 142/1
0-40-45
409
0-15-03 141/1
0-08-10
394/1
0-10-31 166/7
0-23-16
393/5
0-01-39 165
0-04-40
393/6
0-03-37 164/1
0-26-50
394/2
0-03-48 179/3
0-04-40
393/9
0-06-35 179/9
0-08-18
393/8
0-06-20
164/2
393/10
0-05-46 179/10
0-09-66
393/13
0-06-21 179/12
0-08-61
393/12
0-02-43
0-68-21
180/2
393/14
0-00-57 250/2
0-05-37
393/23
0-04-57 250/1
0-03-67
393/18
0-00-86 251/1
0-19-25
393/19
0-03-48 251/2
0-20-40
393/20
0-03-49 249
0-04-93
393/21
0-07-07 248
0-31-34
393/22
0-02-60 210
0-03-87
396/16
0-01-35 211/4
0-25-27
396/19
0-10-17 202
0-01-04
396/18
0-00-15 211/3
0-25-00
392
0-32-04 211/2
0-12-28
388
0-45-65
0-26-32
215/1
389/5
0-03-40
0-00-35
215/3
389/6
0-05-68 214/1 0-09-01
389/12
0-10-38 218/1
0-19-78
382/5
0-04-13
0-47-92
244/2
382/4
0-05-97
0-56-65
243
382/9
0-03-03
0-19-65
242/1
382/3
0-09-86 242/2
0-20-05
382/11
0-10-94 241
0-19-17
382/10
0-01-30 238
0-06-61
382/15
281/4
0-51-62
382/12
0-11-83 281/2
0-05-96
382/13
0-12-48
0-04-28
281/3 5962
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
5
3
4
Erode Perundurai No. 104
9.Erode Perundurai No. 115
382/14
0-09-83
Voi pady
Mukasi
433
39/3
0-03-88
0-05-48
Pidariyur
432
39/2
0-01-43 435/8
0-20-60
38
0-00-45
0-02-51
435/7
0-54-51 435/6
0-05-75
13/1
0-02-85 435/5
0-07-53
13/8
0-00-73
0-07-93
435/4
13/9
0-07-27
435/3
13/7
0-07-69 438/1
0-26-80
13/4
0-00-61 438/2
0-15-01
13/5
0-00-55 438/7
0-22-76
13/11
0-02-64 TOTAL 15-37-14
13/12
0-03-84 9. Erode Perundurai No. 115
13/18
0-00-72 Mukasi
13/17
0-00-36
0-29-01
Pidariyur 52/2
13/13
0-05-07 52/3
0-21-46
13/15
52/1
0-02-24
13/14
0-07-91 53/1
0-03-52
15/1
0-23-31 53/7
12
0-00-12
0-00-41
51/9
318
51/10
0-00-41
0-03-96
51/12
0-09-40
317
0-05-11
0-12-31
51/13
0-22-62
319/1
0-74-74
56
319/3
0-15-27
0-01-64
57
319/5
0-02-54 43/12
0-05-03
0-04-51
319/2
42/1
0-01-11
322/5
0-09-55 42/4
0-11-57
322/4
0-08-54 42/3
0-03-89
322/6
0-05-95 42/2
322/3
0-15-19
0-00-74
42/6
322/2
0-17-18 42/5
0-11-45
322/1
0-03-84 41/5
0-01-34
323/2
0-06-38 42/10
0-00-52
323/3
0-02-70 41/16
0-07-66
323/4
0-02-45 41/17
0-09-90
323/5
0-15-11 41/15
0-10-84
323/9
0-08-56 41/18
0-00-29
323/8
0-08-61 41/11
0-03-35
323/7
0-02-61 41/14
0-06-72
37/1
0-22-54
0-01-27
324/7
0-00-66
37/2
0-12-50
324/6 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
5963 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 9. Erode Perundurai No. 115 Mukasi324/4 0-05-92
0-20-54
10.Erode Perundurai No. 114 Inguri707/8
0-05-90
Pidariyur 324/5
707/12
0-18-07 324/3
0-08-63
708/5
0-11-74 324/1
708/6
0-08-15 324/2
0-04-96
708/4
0-04-14 327/2
0-01-40
708/3
0-02-95 327/3
708/9
0-04-07 327/1
0-10-26
708/11
0-03-28 327/10
0-12-34
1067/1
0-17-46 327/11
0-04-02
1067/2
0-03-39 327/14
0-05-96
1067/3
0-39-12 327/15
0-06-14
1068/2
0-13-23 327/16
0-04-93
1068/1
0-53-28 328/1
0-12-73
1056/1
0-03-81 328/5
0-06-39
TOTAL 4-71-98 328/6
0-07-40
328/7
11Erode Perundurai No. 117/2
0-09-01
Chenni-
328/13
0-10-17
malai
259
0-05-14 328/14
0-02-63
258/2
0-24-16 330
0-03-52
258/1
0-16-82 385
0-02-77
257/1
0-20-72 388/7
0-08-37
164
0-02-34 388/6
0-27-20
168/2
0-25-31 388/5
0-00-87
168/3
0-13-06 388/9
0-19-26
168/1
0-23-64 388/4
0-13-93
169/1
0-02-87 387
0-06-97
169/2
0-32-41 403
0-23-39
171/5
0-29-95 402/1
0-16-32
175/4
0-03-61 405
0-00-33
170/1
0-28-11 TOTAL 7-90-49
179
0-09-55 10 Erode Perundurai No. 114
174/3
0-15-80 668/4
0-00-58
Ingur
175
0-23-25 668/7
0-25-29
178
0-05-82 700
0-08-43
182/1
0-29-68 701
0-41-24
229
0-03-22 702
0-45-78
182/2
0-20-23 703
0-67-40
228/1
0-13-05 705
0-08-47
183 / 1B
0-03-31 706/1
0-29-12
0-13-41
228/8
706/3
0-42-44
228/15
0-11-75 5964
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
4
5
3
5 3
1
2
4
1
2
183/4
0-05-33
No.46
11. Erode Perundurai No. 117/2
13.Erode Erode
Pudur
711
0-25-91
0-13-29
183/6
Cherinimalai
712
0-48-07
0-04-43
184
0-42-72
703
224/1
0-17-03
0-43-43
702
224/4
0-07-86
701
0-03-89
0-16-11
185/2
0-28-05
694
0-28-71
185/3
0-43-04
693
0-24-82
223/1
0-04-21
696
0-03-73
186/2
0-04-79
698
0-04-05
186/5
TOTAL 2-44-11
0-18-20
186/3
186/4
0-02-86
No.48.
14. Erode Erode
Thuyyam
186/9
0-41-71
Poondurai 643
0-29-05
186/8
633
0-65-03
0-05-18
186/10
631
0-04-53
0-08-48
186/11
0-20-20
634
0-05-52
186/12
636
0-13-19
0-04-07
186/13
0-03-37
640
0-05-66
186/14
0-46-80
638
186/15
0-05-71
0-00-23
637
0-05-81
186/16
0-46-06
639
0-08-34
186/17
0-42-22
619
189
0-06-36
0-31-27
620
0-24-46
117/1
0-62-09
594
0-39-32
117/2
0-60-45
595
0-26-06
116
0-08-40
596
6-97-75
TOTAL
0-50-41
598
12. Erode Perundurai No. 109.
0-04-09
601
Vadamugam
0-22-87
603
878/3C
0-24-37
Vellodu
533
0-61-34
0-22-05
879/1
530
0-17-37 879/2
0-02-05
880/3
0-55-80
6-01-63
TOTAL
0-05-56
886
No. 53 .
15. ErodeErode
0-26-76
887/1
Aval
0-05-03
Poondurai 95
0-23-42
887/2
0-04-35
94
0-25-46
888
0-10-32
93
0-15-30
890/6
0-13-58
92
2-00-77
TOTAL 5965
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
1
2
4
3
2
1
16. Erode Erode
0-29-63、
No. 53 Aval 91
0-37-67
90
Poondurai
0-06-40
88
0-17-89
79
0-01-19
87
0-42-52
76
0-06-60
79
0-44-51
80
0-05-68
62
0-01-77
81
0-00-58
59
0-31-08
60
0-00-47
57
0-02-95
58
0-03-49
54
0-45-08
56
0-29-90
55
0-03-57
42
0-31-62
43
0-23-13
44
0-31-19
45
0-38-08
25
0-19-81
24
20
0-46-91
201
0-13-08
203
0-43-60
202
0-01-02
224
0-39-78
225
InBet Svy
Ni. 225&
0-03-68
229
0-53-91
229
0-12-49
230
0-18-14
231
0-03-33
232
0-21-93
258
0-37-55
245
0-00-13
252
0-29-32
246
0-14-01
247
0-34-25
241
0-00-57
243
0-05-22
242
0-33-61
239
9-00-72
TOTAL
2333 GI/2003-12
5
4
3
No. 47
Modavandi
Satyaman-
0-37-01 204
galam
0-28-67 205
0-01-26 203
0-20-82 206
0-04-67
210
0-01-21 209
0-52-86
238
0-30-27 237
0-09-73
235
0-54-95
234
0-21-99
230
0-32-64
231
0-28-29
226
0-04-14
478
0-49-55
477
0-14-72-
480
0-31-65
482
0-09-31
483
0-46-07
484
0-00-36
492
0-04-95
473
0-57-05
494
0-62-15
495
0-14-72
462
0-20-68
461
0-14-22
460
0-08-21
459
0-12-98
458
0-46-36
455
0-08-95
446
0-28-06
449
0-05-22
448
0-30-47
441
0-29-73
442
0-54-40
432
0-23-90
436
0-38-95
435
0-03-78
405
0-39-57
404
0-20-80
402
0-17-52
403
0-05-11
530
0-20-94
532
0-34-75
534
0-02-83
535
10-86-47
TOTAL 5966
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)]
1
4
2
5 1
2
4
5
3
3
No. 19
19.Nama-Tiruche-
17. Erode Erode No. 45 Nanjai
kkal gode
Uthukuli 17
0-76-40
Pappam-
219
0-05-70
palayam
16
0-07-31
19
220
0-73-28
0-54-93
32
0-32-12
226
0-56-28
0-04-10
31
TOTAL 1-35-26 30
0-04-75
33
0-55-47
No. 29
20.Nama-Tiruche-
29
0-00-18
Thokkavadi
kkal gode
37
0-35-00
Kavundam-
36
0-56-26
-0-18-19
148
palaym
40
0-18-43
155
0-85-19 97
0-03-94
0-05-80
154
95
0-66-97
0-23-55
153
0-04-79
94.
0-32-57
85
TOTAL 1-32-73 86
84
0-37-03 21. Nama-Tiruche- No. 29
0-74-41
Thokkavadi 285
kkal gode
112
0-07-54
286
0-30-37
0-05-33
113
0-79-97
288
0-02-64
79
290
0-34-52 114
0-06-46
292
0-77-12
78
0-52-51 76
0-50-33
303
0-35-44
0-71-91
141
302
0-47-75 142
0-12-88
297
140
0-44-62
0-56-53
155
0-25-10
301
0-00-34
154
300
0-62-41 156
0-05-54
0-11-02
182
167
0-00-18
0-81-14
183
153
0-13-17
152
0-20-57
0-51-61
167
0-04-95
8-84-17
TOTAL
168
18. Erode Erode No.43
169
0-18-31 Sathambur 2
0-21-39
170
0-17-81
3
0-07-04
9
6-12-74
TOTAL
8
0-07-90
No. 35
22.Nama- Tiruche-
0-23-63
7
Varagu-
kkal gode
0-16-86
13
119
0-52-01
rampatti
0-13-16
16
0-46-62
118
0-25-49
15
10-01-27
120
0-00-35
14
0-40-31
22
117
0-39-39
0-30-14
21
0-44-26
112
0-29-21
25
041-92
106
26
0-02-38
0-00-36
105
0-09-90
27
0-50-62
107
2-32-18
TOTAL 5967 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड' 3 (ii) ]
5
3
5
4
4
3
2
2
1
0-17-69 24. Nama- Tiruche- No. 32.
No.35Vara- 108
Karuvep-
kkal gode
0-09-60
gurampatti 103
0-67-12
243
pampatti
0-52-30
109
0-27-31
242
21
0-07-51
0-33-67
241
11
0-17-05
0-02-70
244
0-28-26
0-47-86 12
228
0-47-88 13
0-38-13
227
0-19-96
226
8
0-67-50
0-05-62
264
5
0-10-41
0-00-72
224
0-33-34
32
265
0-55-24
0-66-06
33
266
0-41-28
0-01-06
34
0-38-16
271
0-62-65
35
0-37-95
272
0-34-30
36
0-21-85
207
0-30-54
37
0-00-37
284
0-33-88
57
2060-73-71
0-45-71
39
0-46-68
203
0-02-88
285
8-32-44
TOTAL
0-49-07
200
No. 31
23.Nama- Tiruche-
0-52-43
286
Devanan-
kkal gode
0-39-77
122
0-20-58 kurichi
293
0-61-51
298
0-31-97
123
048-99
299
129
0-41-29
0-41-24
301
0-36-98
128
0-28-91
8-44-78 139
TOTAL
0-59-48
140
25. Nama- Tiruche- No. 28
0-56-65
136
0-00-49
Emappalli
144
kkal gode
0-00-18
135
0-55-36
143
5
0-08-62
0-45-64
160
0-28-93
6
0-36-77
162
0-60-26
9
0-04-73
163
3
0-13-24
0-01-50
271
0-26-17
10
0-08-37
217
11
0-48-33
0-48-94
218
0-34-17
14
0-05-03
216
13
0-33-43
0-53-71
212
15
0-17-23
0-03-91
236
16
0-91-78
40
0-05-51 211
41
0-45-42
0-32-02 207
4-56-52
TOTAL
5-92-71
TOTAL 5968
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
4
5
4
2
3
2
3
5
0-46-82
No. 22 Kasturi45
288
0-56-51
26. Salem Sankari No. 21
287
0-04-75
37
0-09-38 Morur
patti
39
0-12-77 289
0-54-97
36
290
0-93-71
0-73-90
291
0-04-81
TOTAL
11-82-89
0-47-00
292
28. Salem Sankari No. 18
298
0-49-35
126
0-63-29
Aiveli
299
0-54-29
137
0-08-71 337
0-63-24
136
0-27-98 338
0-10-07
135
0-53-30 514
0-43-39
138
0-08-78 513
0-55-54
134
0-57-94 516
0-33-78
139
0-69-48 512
0-07-40
140
0-00-34 511
0-24-15
83
0-11-86 509
0-27-52
84
0-63-03 506
0-60-29
85
0-07-58 448
0-77-97
82
0-03-39
0-44-87
449
81
0-04-50 450
0-16-18
71
0-50-36 457
0-18-71
72
0-41-80 456
0-33-82
68
0-40-32 TOTAL 8-62-51
67
0-25-50 179
1-04-49
27. Salem Sankari No. 22
0-35-74
64
0-45-22
Kasturipatti 182
65
0-59-36
0-87-62
183
0-97-95
56
0-49-39
184
57
0-00-29
0-38-54
118
0-19-48
54
1-29-57
198
TOTAL
7-50-98
0-22-81
199
197
0-19-23
No. 17
29. Salem Sankari
200
0-52-74
Avaranga-
49
0-58-62 201
0-05-11
palayam
51
0-17-89
0-42-65
97
48
0-01-06 98
0-44-48
52
0-03-92 83
0-29-64
44
0-44-77
0-63-15
82
8
0-10-13 81
0-62-04
9
0-37-15
0-48-97
88
66
0-00-49
22
0-34-68
0-55-23 64
0-20-30
21
65
0-33-08
0-16-97
24
56
0-30-17
25
0-14-76 54
0-19-04
28
0-73-77
0-41-56
55
0-38-05
27
44
0-29-92
7-07-00
TOTAL 5969
भारत, का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30, 2003 /भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
3
5
2
1
3
2
1
0-82-05
31. Salem Sankari No. 15 Ollakka 126
0-54-57
490
No. 31
30. Salem Sankari
0-34-64
0-42-92
118
chihmanur
Vaikuntam 489
0-32-98
0-33-70
119
485
0-58-63
0-30-97
120
486
0-01-04
450
3-85-99
TOTAL
0-45-23
449
0-63-46
32. Salem Sankari
No. 37 Agra- 89
0-52-12
0-52-92 452
harathalayur 91
0-22-94
0-52-04
454
92
0-79-03
455
93
0-26-64
0-00-17
456
1-65-95
TOTAL
0-11-17
57
0-54-62
216
No. 39
33. SalemSankari
0-99-06
0-12-76 58
Kannanderi 217
0-77-10 61
215
0-17-13
0-41-53
208
59
0-06-89
0-37-48 82
209
0-59-28
0-30-45
84
197
0-06-11
236
0-31-00
81
0-45-95
0-20-30
196
85
0-56-66
0-27-02
237
80
0-49-35
0-21-54
238
86
0-55-73
0-04-70
156
89
0-80-78
0-28-15
158
93.
0-00-43
0-64-26
157
94
0-02-17
0-22-81
159
95
0-16-58
125
0-54-26
98
124
0-31-24
0-06-52
97
0-42-98
0-50-03
160
141
0-22-47
0-57-23
114
140
0-65-26
115
0-03-03
143
0-49-52
0-32-64
112
139
0-37-54
0-05-76
110
138
0-05-70
0-05-37
107
137
0-24-47
99
9-82-93
TOTAL
0-90-54
97
0-02-40
143
No. 15
31. Salem Sankari
0-45-21
0-12-76
95
142
Ollakka-
0-26-22
chinnanur 141
0-41-21
94
0-13-02
139
10-52-67
TOTAL
0-15-01
140 5970
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1
1
2
2
3
4
4
3
5
5
35. Salem Sankari
0-00-97
172
No. 40 Pudur
34. Salem Sankari
No. 41In Bet. Svy.
EgapuramNo . 131 and
171
0-52-58
130
0-04-50 168
0-78-60
130
0-25-71 166
0-17-53
129
0-50-65 165
0-06-75
128
0-14-89 161
0-03-81
127
0-22-50 163
0-66-70
69
0-20-16 162
0-26-56
70
0-41-49 145
0-48-60
72
0-25-35 146
0-46-75
75
0-37-74 148
0-73-73
74
0-54-60 149
0-43-88
81
0-04-50 23
0-36-08
83
0-48-99 27
0-40-36
84
0-66-63 24
0-51-26
86
0-01-23 7
0-01-24
87
0-34-75 6
0-34-36
TOTAL
11-00-12 1
0-60-07
41
36. Salem Sankari
No: 16 .
0-33-27 2
0-08-47
42
Vettuka-
0-24-26
44
0-32-32
dupatti
TOTAL
6-98-30
45
0-60-57 35. Salem Sankari No. 41 218
0-41-12
46
0-04-13
0-24-47
226
Egapuram
47
0-19-47 219
0-00-28
52
0-53-44 225
0-98-47
229
0-63-38
TOTAL
2-27-46 230
0-07-30
120
0-54-89
No. 20 .
37. Salem Edappadi
121
0-17-63 231
ppalli
0-26-01
119
Kachichi-
0-33-03 199
0-98-43
118
0-28-90 198
0-40-88
117
0-19-11 197
0-11-90
TOTAL
1-53-56 188
0-63-33
32
No. 13
38. Salem Omallur
0-45-38 189
0-08-23
Marakkottai 31
133
0-41-36
38
0-62-28 134
0-35-79
37
0-62-81 132
0-07-05
36
0-22-74 135
0-51-93
42
0-42-63 InBet. Svy.
44
0-36-33 No. 135 and
131
45
0-10-48
0-27-68 131
46
0-02-91
0-16-02 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5971
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
1
2
3
4
5
1
4
2
3
5 No. 13 47
0-30-19
38. Salem Omallur
90
0-79-54
39. Salem Omallur No. 11
Gundukka 71
0-60-06 Marakkottai 460
0-02-88
69
0-71-87 70
0-55-70
68
0-23-34 71
0-24-82
98
0-36-06 69
0-07-16
104
0-76-43
0-37-70
72
105
0-19-41
106
0-82-71 74
0-71-87
107
0-01-45 13
0-38-69
119
0-08-32 14
0-40-44
120
0-09-24
0-06-99
16
TOTAL 13-87-41 12
0-38-37
40. Salem Omallur No. 12
17
0-92-24
0-65-78
42
Mukkanur
44
0-52-02 TOTAL 7-49-91
43
0-12-24 39. Salem Omallur No. 11
45
0-58-94
0-44-80
Gundukkal 345
37
0-10-01 381
0-00-91
32
0-49-24 346
0-74-88
31
0-23-78
33
0-16-07 348
7
0-90-47 313
0-20-57
0-01-47
30
0-52-34
312
6
0-45-86 315
0-97-14
9
0-44-27 316
0-06-35
4
0-40-83
3
0-74-72
0-28-56
318
0-02-48
2
317
0-16-88
TOTAL
5-88-18 319
0-17-12
42. Dharma- Dharma- No. 3 .
0-03-54
320
Dalavava-
puri
puri
0-40-43
321
627
halli
0-07-35
0-37-68
326
623
0-40-56
626
0-71-48
0-40-17 166
617
0-31-61
0-27-46
165
615
0-41-38 167
0-15-83
594
0-29-46
0-27-28
159
0-21-34
592
0-32-49
160
571
0-13-90 157
0-67-46
572
0-03-39
573
0-39-92 144
0-81-03
574
0-51-61
0-03-67
578
0-11-99
0-67-07
141
579
0-52-28 88
0-52-81
560
0-63-13
559
140
0-01-14
0-13-09
557
0-23-78
0-02-70
TOTAL
4-84-96
0-27-26
89 5972
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2
1
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 42. Dharma - Dharma- No. 1 .
43. Dharma- Dharma- No . 12 Natta- 834
0-48-15 563
Pálavadi
0-56-98
puri puri
dhalli
835
0-65-01
puri
puri
425
0-55-96
741
0-79-06 565
0-03-76
829
0-08-23 568
0-14-06
830
0-32-50 424
0-51-88
204
0-03-18 569
0-38-19
203
1-12-23 570
0-31-88
572
202
0-16-00
0-16-14
571
0-73-62
201
0-22-84 408
198
0-07-01 125
0-04-53
197
0-46-66 126
0-24-08
199
0-44-68 127
0-26-19
178
0-02-28 128
0-31-93
176
0-02-12 140
0-23-90
177
0-31-82 130
0-05-24
174
0-13-07
0-00-77
131
173
0-09-22 132
0-25-36
171
0-29-02 133
0-11-59
170
0-15-05 134
0-14-64
164
0-12-37 598
0-00-49
168
0-08-24 597
0-06-72
165
0-03-17 594
0-30-46
166
0-04-21 593
0-14-81
167
0-15-86 589
0-01-68
828
591
0-29-31
0-06-31 590
0-18-03
827
0-01-87 585
0-18-01
0-37-31
76and 140 584
0-26-51
743
0-76-30 583
0-06-30
0-48-03 TOTAL
6-63-12
84
0-38-03
80
0-45-21 43. Dharma- Dharma- No. 12 .
0-58-43
puri puri Nattadhalli 806
81
0-31-83 805
0-01-30
23
0-37-58 807
0-57-56
21
0-27-36 809
0-14-03
20
0-17-09 813
0-23-63
19
0-04-12 814
0-78-11
18
0-48-33
0-78-60
817
TOTAL 14-11-24 226
0-48-23 5973
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
5
5 3
3
2
1
2
1
44. Dharma- Dharma- No. 15
45. Dharma- Dharma- No. 22.
0-39-25 569
0-22-44
Bahalahalli 761
puri Elagiri
puri puri
puri
0-15-22
571
763 0-04-11
0-00-79
570
0-43-36
TOTAL
0-18-37
573
No. 6
46.Dharma- Penna-
0-11-40
574
Onnappago-
garam
puri
576
0-19-83
0-10-20
undanahalli 481
0-21-24
577
0-17-30
440/1C
0-22-75
581
0-17-91
440/1B
0-06-80
584
440/1D
0-24-29
583
0-03-43
440/1A
0-26-03
589
0-05-90
418/1
590
0-24-82
419
0-97-31
150
0-16-34
420
0-24-02
116
0-00-28
410
0-17-66
114
0-11-44
422/5
0-13-74
109
0-01-89
422/4
0-03-79
108
0-00-51
421/1
0-04-58
102
0-02-28
433/ 1H
0-17-89
106
0-04-98
433/1G
0-15-03
104
0-00-28
422/3
10-15-18
506
423/6
0-09-75
508
0-00-99
433/1E
0-25-69
507
0-05-16
433/1D
511
0-03-10
433/1A
0-41-81
505
0-01-06
433/1C
045-40
512
0-07-33
433/1B
0-05-61
502
432/5
0-18-24
496
0-05-06
432/6
0-06-33.
497
0-09-87
432/3
0-37-92
4
0-11-90
432/2
0-15-47
3
0-08-36
432/1
0-10-98
1
0-07-08
429/10
0-24-98
2
0-05-05
429/9
0-13-14
477
0-00-48
425/ 1B
0-30-64
476
1
0-04-95
429/8
0-26-24
438
0-02-54
429/7
0-26-88
437
0-01-29
429/6
0-00-76
450
0-00-99
426/2
0-42-76
436
0-01-70
429/5
0-23-45
347
0-00-46
429/4
0-50-45
346
0-00-68
429/1
0-54-30
331
0-18-55
426/1
0-15-10
411
0-05-85
427/2
0-25-96
412
0-01-03
427/ 1D
0-27-28
413
0-05-95
427/ 1A
0-16-07
403
0-08-28
427/1B
0-04-42
414
2-35-77
TOTAL TOTAL
2333 GI/2003-13 5974
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )] 1
2
3
4
5
1 2
4
3
5 No. 5
3/2
47. Dharma - Penna-
0-06-88
No. 5
176/1
0-16-65 3/1
puri
0-24-19
garam Madehalli
Madehalli 175/15
2/8
0-14-62
175/14
0-04-27 27
0-12-98
175/11
0-07-97 2/6
0-00-44
175/8
0-08-72 241/1
0-15-89
175/5
0-04-71 240/4
0-04-10
175/4
0-04-66 239/1
0-64-49
175/2
0-11-59 238/1
0-04-03
175/3
0-05-98 241/1
0-30-72
TOTAL
6-68-42 237/5
0-01-89
No. 04
426/2C
48. Dharma- Penna-
0-11-15 237/4
0-05-65
426/2B
puri
0-00-49
garam Pappara-
426/2A
236/12
0-00-97
patty
0-09-97
426/1A
0-06-09 236/11
0-09-56
425/3B
0-07-93 236/9
0-11-09
425/3A
0-11-20 236/7
0-11-73
427
0-00-45 236/5
0-05-66
425/2
0-05-36 236/3
424
0-07-60 236/4
0-12-01
415/9
0-14-17 236/1
0-10-26
415/6
0-02-57 235/13
0-30-39
415/8
0-05-93 235/12
0-12-77
415/7
0-10-70 235/8
0-33-62
415/3
0-02-10 235/7
0-02-87
415/4
0-09-68 235/6
0-17-54
415/1
0-12-68 247/9
0-02-73
410/3
0-21-87 247/8
0-13-01
410/2
0-17-67 247/6
0-11-67
411/5
0-05-58 247/5
0-15-16
411/4
0-19-13 247/4
0-02-05
0-04-05
411/3
247/3
0-04-47
402/4
0-33-31 246/1
0-20-40
402/5
0-05-45 183
0-05-36
402/3C
0-01-77 186/2
0-16-21
402/3B
0-11-75 184
0-46-20
402/3A
0-06-73 179
0-61-69
402/2
0-08-89 178/1
0-14-27
401
0-03-83 176/6
0-13-91
403
0-01-26 176/5
0-02-01
TOTAL
2-50-36 176/2
0-15-28 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
3
1
2
4
5
1
2
0-10-46
49. Dharma-Penna- No. 03
483/4N
0-08-98
Panaikulam 483/4J
puri garam
483/41
0-07-20
483/4H
0-07-13
483/4D
0-08-83
483/4C
0-08-47
0-07-76
483/4B
483/4A
0-09-16
0-11-33
484/5B
484/6 0-05-76
480/3
0-06-76
0-32-52
480/2
0-07-05
478/13
0-05-98
478/12
0-05-54
478/11
0-04-33
478/10
478/9
0-03-98
478/1
0-04-96
0-00-34
479/5
479/4
0-02-45
479/3
0-09-39
475/13A 0-11-81
475/12
0-12-27
0-10-68
475/11
0-14-54
475/ 10A
474/11
0-06-22
0-03-88
474/10
0-14-77
474/8
474/2
472/5
0-28-67
0-06-74
473
208/28
0-02-93
208/2C
0-15-71
0-00-46
208/2D
0-11-41
208/1
0-00-13
208/2A
0-20-36
192/5
0-05-19
193
192/4
0-12-69
0-05-67
192/3
5975 3
4
5
192/2
0-12-44 No. 3
0-10-31 Panaikulam 192/1
78/2
0-41-66
77/4C
0-01-19
77/4B
0-01-68
77 /4A
0-02-89
77/5B
0-03-56
77/3C
0-01-45
0-12-93
77/3B
77/1B
0-17-77
74/6C
0-15-18
74/6B
0-04-11
74/6A
0-06-80
74/4A
0-00-65
0-02-77
74/3B
74/2
0-10-99
0-02-81
74/3A
74/1
0-07-48
0-03-22
75/3B
0-10-24
75/3A
0-13-24
75/2A
75/1
0-03-02
0-13-44
51/4
0-13-27
51/3
0-01-92
51/2
0-16-32
51/7
0-06-75
51/1
51/6
0-00-29
0-45-81
50/2
0-16-33
50/1
0-14-45
49/3
0-13-17
43
41/2A
0-25-65.
0-12-75
41/1D
41/1C
0-08-96
0-13-13
33/9
33/8
0-27-15
0-07-96
33/4
0-01-21
33/7
0-00-46
33/6
0-14-96
33/5
0-10-71
33/1
0-36-46
32/ 1A
0-18-25
29
8-65-30
TOTAL 5976
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
0-41-85
50. Dharma-Penna-
58/3C
Karibaiyan-
0-04-46
Karibaiya- 37 /2B
puri
0-03-09
58/3B
garam nahalli
37/2A
nnahalli
0-03-50 58/2
0-30-36
36/3
0-22-92 58/ 1D
0-01-84
35/4D
0-01-59 57/1C
0-01-13
35/3
0-16-81 57/1B
0-06-43
35/4F
0-00-13 47/5
0-46-16
35/4A
0-01-52 47/4
0-30-06
35/1
0-01-52 47/3
0-11-13
TOTAL 4-42-63 51/3
0-10-03
28
51. Dharma- Penna- No. 7
51/6
0-04-57
puri
0-30-94
garam Velampatty 27
48/11
0-11-26
26
0-38-35 48/7
0-16-66
20
0-08-68 51/3
0-00-55
19
0-44-31 48/6
0-07-59
18
0-76-84 48/5
0-05-94
TOTAL
1-99-22 50/2C
0-28-63
52.Dharma- Pala-
78
No.44.
0-09-14 49/5E
0-01-43
Tomalahalli 77
0-35-83
puri kodu
31/6
0-04-89
76
0-41-79 49/5D
0-02-29
74
0-34-06 49/5C
0-03-13
72
0-52-72 49/5B
0-04-69
73
0-24-53 31/5
0-01-52
71
0-25-35 49/5A
0-02-09
70
0-55-23
0-20-50
49/4
68
0-18-52 32/ 1P2
0-08-37
69
0-54-58 32/2
0-41-20
64
0-05-42 38/ 1E
0-02-46
63
0-79-13 38/1C
0-02-86
62
0-04-81 32/ 1P1
0-01-33
61
0-15-53 37/2H
0-08-97
4-56-64
TOTAL
37 /2E
0-13-50
37/2D
0-09-38
[File No. L- 14014/26/03 -G.P. ] 37/2C
0-04-29
SWAMI SINGH , Director 5977 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3
5
1
2
4
6 नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
कोईबसूर तिरूपूर 23. मुथनम्
0-07-85
105
पालयम्
100 0-00-70
102/1 0-29-11
101B 0-04-71
0-02-74
101/ 1A
का. आ. 2465.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन कोची-कायम्कुलम बंगलौर पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्था के साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
102/2 0-08-61 .
101/242 0-01-02
101/243 0-15-46
0-03-47
103/Pt
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
101/2B 0-27-48
117/2 0-08-61
0-01-20
104/1
0-03-41
125/2
0-04-23
125/3
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
125/8 0-26-48
0-04-96
125/4
0-07-29
125/6
0-03-56
125/7
0-26-18
124/3
0-30-32
124/2
0-07-66GP
133
0-14-65GP
134/2
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख सेजिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड , कावेरी बेसिन , 19 , पेरूमल पूर्वी गली, नागापट्टिनम -611 001 ( तमिलनाडु ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
0-34-31
134/1D
अनुसूची
0-32-25
157/1B
सर्वे संख्या क्षेत्रफल
तहसील गाँव
क.सं. जिला
0-03-03
157/2B
5
4
6
1
2
3
0-43-87
157/2C
0-34-42
467/1
046-10
158/4
1. कोईबत्तूर तिरूपूर 26. उगधनूर
467/2 0-27-94
0-08-34
158/3
0-24-63
470/1
0-00-43
158/1
470/2 0-35-92
0-00-10
158/2
0-33-99
460/1
0-00-97
159/1
0-00-10
460/2
0-01-01 459/1 0-06-92
159/2
0-23-79
462/4
046-93
159/3
0-00-16
462/3
0-11-93GP
214
0-05-18
463
0-03-91
210
1-93-05
कुल
0-00-36
209/4A
0-16-74GP 2.
209/3
23. मुथनम्
0-51-72
92
पालयम्
0-30-73
209/1A
0-03-25
107/ 1A
0-04-93
209/1B
0-00-57
107/2B
0-04-88
209/ 1C
0-25-27
107/1B
0-18-57
209/2B
0-22-42
106/1
0-09-88
209/5
0-56-97
106/2
0-00-10GP
200/1 5978
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
S
6 कोईबत्तूर तिरूपूर 23. मुथनम्
कोईबत्तूर
475/10 0-00-92
तिरूपूर 19. नल्लूर
200/2
पालयम्
0-33-37
472/1A 0-58-03 200/3 0-10-96
474/2A4 0-00-10 207/Pt 0-00-10
201/2
474/2A5
0-50-64
0-01-75 199 0-31-74
472/1B 0-08-76 202 0-29-50
472/1C 0-00-53 203/1 0-58-95
472/1D 0-13-09 203/2 0-15-64
472/2 0-02-00 GP 194
0-05-02 GP
471 0-50-45 239/1 0-13-30
241
470
0-06-48
0-40-99
243/8 0-62-62
479
0-64-65 243/7
469
0-04-78 GP 243/6 0-00-74
462/1 0-01-06 243/5 0-07-48
462/2 0-45-33 245/2 0-02-31
463/4 0-17-45 245/3A 0-26-70
245/3B 0-37-60
463/5 0-05-34 245/1 0-00-33
463/9 0-03-92 249
0-05-30
461/1 0-62-50 251/8 0-01-63
456/1 0-24-13 250/ 1E 0-00-42
456/2 0-05-64 250/ 1C 0-00-47
460/ 1Pt 0-01-38- 250/1B 0-01-91
251/6 0-06-54
457/4 0-49-97 251/7 0-03-53
454/1A2 0-58-22 250/ 1A 0-28-23
454/1A1 0-04-18 266/3 0-31-61
454/2A2 0-01-30 267/1 0-33-75
454/2A1 0-03-84 268/6 0-54-46
268/4
432/2D 0-03-93
0-08-11
268/5 0-34-75
0-04-79
432/27
270Pt 0-23-91
449/Pt 0-00-15 268/2 0-00-68 GP
433/2A 0-35-05 268/3 0-00-44
433/1 0-07-87 274 0-52-21
433/2B 0-15-59 271/Pt 0-20-04
434
0-22-92 272/2k 0-13-67
0-05-44
272/2j
440/ ID 0-30-75 272/21 0-08-07
440/ 1E 0-01-64 272/2h 0-13-25
440/2E 0-21-58 272/2g 0-12-36
440/2A 0-18-98 .
272/1 0-05-07 GP
441/1 0-08-79
15-16-71
कुल
441/2 0-02-44 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5979
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
S
6 441/3 0-27-92
कोईबसूर तिरूपूर 19. नल्लूर
20. मुडलि-
कोईबत्तूर तिरूपूर
443/1 0-27-59
167 0-00-10
पालयम्
442/1 0-38-02
166/ 1Pt 0-41-84 394/1C 0-03-85
166/ 1Pt 0-03-78 GP 394/1B 0-04-81
139/2Pt 0-29-36-
139/3 0-37-17 394/ 1A 0-12-56
0-21-57
143/3
394/2 0-07-49GP
143/2 0-35-88 392/Pt 0-00-71
143/1 0-02-25 कुल 7-93-23
142/Pt 0-00-68 21. नाध्वी
141/5 0-26-40
0-33-73
110/Pt
141/3
पालयम्
0-09-87 109/1C 0-46-64
141/7 0-47-60
0-01-37
0-13-64 109/1B
141/2
125
109/ 1A 0-02-16
0-46-98
0-38-84
109/2
124/3 0-21-14 108 0-14-68
124/2 0-20-39 107/1 0-01-55
0-01-88
123/2C 107/2 0-35-77
123/2B 0-34-54 106 0-08-53GP
0-27-20
122/2C 105 0-16-04
122/2A 0-23-77
1-99-31
8-38-26 कुल
कुल
कोईबत्तूर तिरूपूर 20. मुडलि-
कोईबत्तूर कोईबत्तूर 47. ओरटुकु-
374/2 0-54-72
पाई
410 0-16-15
(दक्षीण)
पालयम्
381
0-02-86 374/3 0-00-10
371/2 0-25-50 375/2 0-04-43
371/1
373
0-23-36
0-67-98
370/1 0-20-00 368/Pt 0-07-59 GP
365
0-03-82
0-00-10
368/Pt
291/2 0-50-32 367/2 0-57-44
0-45-19
291/1
0-23-45
367/Pt
0-02-27
292
159/2APt 0-03-81 GP
0-12-77
300/ 1A
0-03-62
159/1B
0-18-30
300/1B
0-02-68
159/1B
299/2A 0-21-48
0-23-06
159/ 1A
0-03-24
299/2B 161/2 0-41-29
298/2A 0-01-93 162/1 0-03-48
0-10-66
298/2B 164
0-43-63
0-49-74
309/1
169
0-26-37
0-02-17
309/2
165/2B 0-00-10
308 0-01-13
0-00-23
165/2A
310 0-08-57
0-28-14
165/1 5980
THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
4
S
6
कोईबत्तूर
47. ओरटुकु- पाई
311
0-15-57
कोईबसूर (दक्षीण)
Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein.
0-18-28
324/1
323/1A 0-54-25
313
0-06-40
315 0-25-30
316/1 0-79-45
314 0-25-13
0-05-86
317/2
318/1 0-29-04
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one -days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, Cauveri Basin, 19 , Perumal East Street , Nagapattinam -611001 (Tamilnadu) .
0-24-67
319
SCHEDULE
209/1 0-11-99
209/2 0-02-57
Village
208/2 0-43-88
Sl. District Taluk No.
Survey No.
207/2 0-11-47
Area Acquired (inHect) 207/1 0-02-12
2
1
3
4
5
6
0-00-10
204/2B
206
0-01-29
0-34-42
1. Coimba- Tiruppur 26. Ugayanur 467/1
205/1 0-02-21
tore
467/2 0-27-94 205/2 0-27-54
470/1 0-24-63
470/2 0-35-92 203/3A 0-19-90
460/1 0-33-99 203/4 0-18-03
460/2 0-00-10 203/5 0-08-63
459/1 0-06-92- 202/2 0-25-45
462/4 0-23-79 184 0-06-07
462/3 0-00-16 202/1 0-44-59
463 0-05-18
0-29-25
Total 1-93-05 कुल
[फा. सं. एल-14014/26/03-जी.पी. ] 2. Coimba- Tiruppur 23. Muthan- tore
92 0-51-72
ampalayam
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक
107/ 1A 0-03-25 New Delhi , the 19th August, 2003
107/2B 0-00-57
0-25-27
107/1B
106/1 0-22-42
106/2 0-56-97
105
0-07-85 S.O. 2465.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Kochi- Kayamkulam -Bangalore Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Tamilnadu , a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;
100
102/1 0-29-11
101B 0-04-71
0-02-74
101/ 1A And whereas it appears to the Central Governinent that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
102/2 0-08-61
101/2A2 0-01-02 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and 5981
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
6
2
5
6
1
3
2
4
5
1
3
Coimba- Tiruppur 23. Muthan-
Tiruppur 23. Muthan-
0-58-95
tore
2. Coimba- tore
203/1
ampalayam
0-15-46
101/2A3
ampalayam
0-15-64
203/2
0-03-47
103 /Pt
0-27-48
101/2B
0-05-02GP
194
117/2 0-08-61
239/1 0-13-30
0-01-20
104/1
0-40-99
241
0-03-41
125/2
243/8 0-62-62 125/3 0-04-23
0-00-10
243/7
125/8 0-26-48
0-00-74
243/6
125/4 0-04-96
0-07-48
243/5
125/6 0-07-29
0-02-31
245/2
0-03-56
125/7
0-26-70
245/3A
0-26-18
124/3
0-37-60
245/3B 124/2 0-30-32
0-00-33
245/1
133 0-07-66GP
249 0-05-30
0-14-65 GP
134/2
0-01-63
251/8
0-34-31
134/ID
0-00-42
250/ 1E
0-32-25
157/1B
0-00-47
250/1C 157/2B 0-03-03
0-43-87
0-01-91 157/2C
250/ 1B 158/4 0-46-10
0-06-54
251/6
0-08-34
158/3
0-03-53
251/7
0-00-43
158/1
0-28-23
250/1A 158/2 0-00-10
266/3 159/1 0-00-97
267/1
0-01-01
159/2
268/6
0-46-93
159/3
268/4
0-11-93 GP
214
268/5
0-03-91
210
0-23-91
270/Pt.+
0-00-36
209/4A
E122
0-16-74GP
209/3
0-00-68 GP
268/2
0-30-73
209/1A
268/3
0-04-93
209/1B
274
0-04-88
209/1C
0-20-04
271/Pt
0-18-57
209/28
0-13-67
272/2k
0-09-88
209/5
272/2j
0-00-10GP
200/1
0-08-07
272/21
0-33-37
200/2
0-10-96
0-13-25. 200/3
272/2h
0-00-10
207/Pt
0-12-36
272/2g
0-50-64
201/2
0-05-07GP
272/1
0-31-74
199
15-16-71
Total
0-29-50
202
2333 GI/2003-14 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 5982
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
6
5
4
2
3
1
6
5
4
2 3
1
10-27-59
443/
19. Nallur
Coimba- Tiruppur
0-00-92
0-38-02 475/10
442/1
tore
0-58-03
472/1A
0-03-85
394/1C
0-00-10
474/2A4
0-04-81
394/1B
0-01-75
474/2A5
0-12-56
394/1A
0-08-76
472/1B
0-07-49GP
394/2
0-00-53
472/ 1C
0-00-71
0-13-09
392/Pt
472/ ID
0-02-00GP
472/2
Total 7-93-23
0-50-45
471
21. Nachi
Colmba Tiruppur
470 0-06-48
0-33-73
110/E
tore
0-64-65
palayam
479
122Pt
0-04-78GP
469
0-46-64
109/1C
462/1 0-01-06
0-01-37
109/1B
10-45-33
462/2
0-17-45
0-02-16 463/4
109/ 1A 463/5 0-405-34
0-38-84
109/2
0413-92
463/9
0-14-68
108
0-62-50
461/1
0-01-55
107/1
0-24-13
456/1
0-35-77
107/2
0-05-04
456/2
0-08-53GP
106
0401-38
460/1Pt
0-16-04
105
0-49-97
457/4
(0-58-22
454/1A2
1-99-31
Total
0-04-18
454/ 1A1
0-54-72
374/2
20.Mudalipalayam
0401-30
454/2A2
374/3
454/2A1 0-403-84
0-04-43
375/2
(0-403-93
432/20
0-67-98
373
(0-04-79
432/2F
0-07-59GP
368/Pt
0-00-15
449/Pt
0-00-10
368/M
0-35-05
433/2A
0-57-44
367/2 433/1
0-23-45
367/1Pt
0-407-87
(0-15-59
433/28
0-03-81GP
159/Pt
0-22-92
434
0-03-62
159/ 1B
0-30-75
440/ID
0-02-68
159/ 1B
0-01-64
440/1E
0-23-06
159/ 1A
0-21-58
440/2E
0-41-29
161/2
0-18-98
440/2A
0-03-48
162/1
0-08-79
441/1
0-43-63
164
10-02-44
441/2
0-26-37
169
0-27-92
441/3 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगला 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
5983 1
2
3
6
2
3
4
1
5
6 165/23 0-00-10
20.Mudalipalayam
Coimba- Coimba- 47 , Orattu-
tore tore (South) kuppai 298/2A 0-01-93 165/2A 0-00-23
298/28 0-10-66 165/1 0-28-14
0-00-10
167
0-49-74
309/1
166/ 1Pt 0-41-84
309/2 0-02-17 166/1Pt 0-03-78GP
308 0-01-13 139/2Pt 0-29-36
310 0-08-57 139/3 0-37-17
311 0-15-57 143/3 0-21-57
324/1 0-18-28 143/2 0-35-88
0-54-25
323/ 1A
0-02-25
143/1
313
0-06-40 142/Pt 0-00-68
315 0-25-30 141/5 0-26-40
141/3 0-09-87
316/1 0-79-45
0-47-60
141/7
314 0-25-13
0-13-64
141/2
317/2 0-05-86 125 0-46-98
0-29-04
318/1
124/3 0-21-14
319 0-24-67 124/2 0-20-39
209/1 0-11-99
0-01-88
123/2C
0-02-57
209/2
123/2B 0-34-54
208/2 0-43-88
0-27-20
122/2C
207/2 0-11-47 122/2A 0-23-77
207/1 0-02-12
8-38-26
Total
0-00-10
204/2B Coimba- Coimba- 47. Orattu-
0-16-15
tore
206
0-01-29 kuppai 410
tore (South)
381
0-02-86
0-02-21
205/1
0-25-50
371/2
205/2 0-27-54 371/1 0-23-36
0-19-90
203/3A
0-20-00
370/1
203/4 0-18-03 365 0-03-82
203/5 0-08-63 291/2 0-50-32
0-25-45
202/2
291/1 0-45-19
184
0-02-27
292
0-06-07
0-44-59
202/1
0-12-77
300/ 1A
0-18-30
300/ 1B
0-29-25
Total
0-21-48
299/2A
[F. No. L- 14014/26/03 -GP. ]
0-03-24
299/2B
SWAMI SINGH, Director [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
5984
5
4
3
1
2
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
0-08-93
होसूर 130 - थैयरायानन्दुगम 48
धर्मपुरी
0-16-55
52
0-31-20
53
0-07-30
61
0-09-08
58
का० आ० 2466.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में राष्ट्रीय गैस ग्रिड परियोजना के अधीन कोची- कायम्कुलम - बंगलौर पाइपलाइन सेक्टर के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा अतिरिक्त पाइपलाइनें बिछाने और सहयुक्त सुविधाओं की व्यवस्थाके साथ एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
0-00-46
62
0-00-72
59
0-03-58
56
0-06-50
57
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
0-11-06
55
0-03-70
93
0-35-09
922
0-04-08
921
0-02-59
923
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
0-42-59
919
0-40-53
918
0-26-28
909
0-03-51
910
0-17-42
884
0-07-46
885
0-00-52
887
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, कावेरी बेसिन , 19 पेरूमल पूर्वी गली, नागापट्टिनम -611001 ( तमिलनाडु ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
0-10-03
883
0-31-56
879
अनुसूची
876
0-28-49 गाँव
तहसील
जिला
(0-00-700 नं० खसरा
878
अर्जित क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में )
0-18-64
873
5
4
3
1
2
874
0-23-32
0-58-96
होसूर 130 - थैयरायानन्दुंगम 36
धर्मपुरी
872
0-04-55
32
0-07-96
0-11-50
1053
0-42-85
31
0-11-98
870
0-16-88
33
(0-57-23
869
0-06-07
28
0-29-43
853
0-11-55
29
0-54-50
852
0-05-03
27
0-43-50
26
(0-02-74
831
0-25-18
21
0-14-41
830
0-18-89
17
829
0-08-26
16
0-25-51
826
0-09-71
13
0-01-26
825
0-12-48
12
0-11-53
824
0-21-48
11
0-53-18
822
0-07-59
10
0-41-78
953
47
0-11-86 5985
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3
+
5
1
2
4
5
3
2
1
0-01-02
1071
0-07-81
नं०-132 उडनपल्ली
होसूर
धर्मपुरी
धर्मपुरी होसूर 130 -थैयरायानन्दुगम 956
1073 0-00-36
957
0-00-81
0-30-63
1072
955
0-58-63
997
962
0-05-44
0-25-36
998
0-40-30
980
0-07-06
999
0-30-43
979
0-30-21
995
978
0-07-13
0-06-31
994
0-13-84
987
0-35-79
972
0-34-55
988
0-00-46
960
0-11-30
1018
0-38-85
959
0-25-62
1016
0-41-49
958
0-31-94
1017
957
0-43-05
1026 0-65-51
956
0-02-94
0-03-06
1025
0-33-45-
955
1029 0-25-91
954
0-40-31
0-04-84
1028
0-97-99
1169
1030 0-30-10
252
0-00-13
1024 0-16-30
253
.0-00-40
14-33-36
कुल
0-13-69
271
1143
नं०-132 उडनपल्ली
269
0-03-01
1142 0-16-91
0-06-59
270
0-26-71
1141
0-24-99
272
1138
305
0-46-08
1139 0-19-61
0-07-11
275
0-09-98
1140
0-01-37
304
0-00-12
1134
277
0-05-39
1135 0-27-51
0-32-76
303
0-03-19
1136
0-19-27
302
1133 0-04-43
0-38-63
1159
0-12-34
1132
0-23-81
286
0-17-93
1131
0-13-18
287
1114 0-11-18
0-09-35
158
0-07-24
1113
0-01-17
161
0-05-70
1115
0-24-14
159
0-10-88
1100
0-28-73
160
0-23-99
1099
0-43-24
166
0-04-39
1097
0-20-75
165
0-34-01
1096
0-16-95
172
0-45-54
0-75-27
1079
198
0-07-12
191
1074 0-14-25 5986
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
4
1
2
3
5 2
3
4
5
1
0-04-31
नं० 98 अच्छेटिपल्ली 849
0-56-26
192
नं०-132 उडनपल्ली
होसूर
धर्मपुरी
होसूर
धर्मपुरी
0-31-20
848
0-35-55
193
850
189
0-07-48
678
0-11-51 194
679
0-47-69
188
680
0-25-94
13-43 10
कुल
686
0-12-40
0-31-19
नं ० 98 अच्छेटिपल्ली 539
687
0-36-82
0-01-56
540
688
0-05-73 537
0-08-11
689
0-23-41
0-59-30
535
713
0-13-90 534
0-00-96
0-05-70
691
0-08-94
1012
711
0-21-36
0-14-22
1013
706
0-26-35 1014 0-09-38
705
0-10-57 1015
0-16-43
707
0-04-49
0-15-30
1016
702
0-30-49 1017
0-09-80
701
0-32-45 1018 0-06-38
851
0-00-59
1006
10-20-54
कुल
1005 0-14-44
नं ० 93 नगोन्डपल्ली 622
1004 0-46-66
621
0-50-48 1003
0-17-28
620
0-35-74 1002 0-24-92
616
0-55-40
0-50-93
1001
0-15-08
614
775
0-39-31
613
0-37-49 823
0-52-13
610
0-62-24
0-27-65
822
561
0-15-39 817
0-34-38
558
0-47-99 813
0-03-50
0-18-24
557
0-02-43
814
559
0-24-13 816
0-15-25
3-62-28 815
0-15-79
कुल
0-16-76
819
223
0-27-83
नं० 91 पून्नपल्ली
808
0-05-13
222
807
0-03-07
221
0-58-47 806
0-41-19
863.
0-80-26 842
0-24-14
240
0-01-82 843
0-38-58
256 0-06-07 853
0-22-01
862
0-02-34 852
0-36-21
271
0-17-33 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5987
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
4 1
2
3
12
3
5
4
5
0-11-76
195 होसूर
धर्मपुरी
में ० 91 पूम्नपल्ली InBet Svy. 0-03-34 धर्मपुरी होसूर नं० 91 पून्नपल्ली
No.862&
0-43-72
144
271
0-28-74
154
269
0-29-27
159
0-00-54
272
0-50-64
0-26-56
160
273
0-28-59
161
0-00-13
274
0-21-08
164
0-12-10
275
0-01-65
168
0-16-59
0-01-92
281
0-19-31
167
280
0-45-69
171
295
0-26-87
172
0-17-46
296
0-22-86
119
0-07-28
422
0-05-84
96
0-05-64
394
0-08-48
95
0-00-12
395
0-16-51
0-01-15
97
398
0-18-71
0-40-86
94
399
98
0-08-97
402
0-09-58
0-11-46
93
400
0-31-16
92
0-02-16
401
0-02-07
79
0-46-34
406
0-01-24
80
0-21-77
InBet Svy:0-01-97
78
0-22-09
No. 400&
412
0-42-85
81
413
10-66-15
कुल
412
0-08-97
453
0-22-39
पलकोटु नं० 23 सेट्टीहुल्ली
410
0-05-41
451
0-89-72
411
0-14-81
450
0-15-52
409
0-01-41
0-40-89
448
691
0-28-46
432
0-30-90
213
431
0-19-30
695
0-10-17
430 0-32-55
696
0-09-35
429
0-23-72
698
0-11-75
428
0-33-18
699
0-03-60
425
0-06-66
700
404
0-38-67
703
0-08-02
336
0-39-66
702
0-10-52
337
0-25-78
0-05-31
197
318
0-25-76
704
0-00-41
316
0-39-21
143
0-07-15
315
0-23-99
196
0-00-11 [PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
5988
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
0-23-30
310
पलकोटु नं० 23 सेट्टीहुल्ली
धर्मपुरी
0-23-17
308
0-25-96
306
0-10-11
302
0-17-98
301
0-03-74
300
399
0-32-28
347
0-16-88
299
0-08-07
298
0-04-57
348
0-07-38
In Bet Svy.
No. 348&
60
0-14-93
60
0-32-74
62
0-15-39
63
0-13-72
64
0-53-07
65
0-06-14
66
67
0-11-32
0-26-43
90
68
0-16-36
88
0-25-66
87
0-38-62
86
0-06-96
74
0-10-38
75
35
0-15-31
0-03-91
21
0-20-08
23
0-20-16
22
0-08-47
25
0-00-58
28
0-02-69
26
0-39-86
27
0-17-50
In Bet Svy.
No. 27 &
VB.
10-81-82
कुल
5
4
3
0-23-70
218
धरमपुरी पलकोटु नं० 88 जकासमुद्रम्
0-13-58
219
0-38-98
223
0-21-70
222
0-27-42
234
0-28-35
233
0-13-85
232
0-22-96
231
0-01-80
229
225
0-00-44
245
0-36-34
230
0-48-18
247
0-31-36
274
0-07-82
252
0-29-03
253
0-26-90
271
246
0-23-80
272
0-67-92
273
0-25-14
268
0-00-65
266
0-00-66
65
0-00-62
64
66
0-02-14
0-11-94
267
0-83-25
67
0-45-76
59
0-02-09
60
0-13-41
58
0-59-37
363
0-26-79
364
0-42-93
365
0-54-25
361
360
0-11-25
0-16-07
359
8-60-75
कुल
0-94-59
257
नं० 81 चुडन्नूर
0-27-16
251
0-27-56
255 5989
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
4
1
4
5
3
2
2
3
1
155
0-14-82
252
0-76-63 धर्मपुरी पलकोटु न. 21 संगमबासू
धरमपुरी पलकोटु नं० 81 चुडन्नुर
253
0-09-55
163
0-02-71
बन्तलौ
0-25-20
243
162
0-25-00
244
0-15-39
0-17-35
161
0-43-80
242
0-03-26
176
0-02-67
0-63-12
181
238
0-30-32
476
0-46-28
239
474
0-00-76
237 0-02-46
0-23-46
187
0-03-62
236
0-28-58
188
233
0-64-26
234
189
0-12-34
336
0-17-31
235
0-50-39
0-25-59
335
4-89-66
कुल
0-21-12
334
0-34-23
नं० 83 महेन्द्र मंगलम् 6
0-01-33
327
7
0-01-20
0-59-96
328
0-67-22
5
401
0-02-14
0-46-94
18
329
0-23-31
19
0-53-37
7-38-28
कुल
0-12-72
20
113
21
ढेनकनि नं० 70 करुकनहल्ली
0-28-42
0-55-64
112
कोटई
0-05-76
33
0-13-49
111
0-17-20
34
0-15-37
110
2-67-06
कुल
0-00-28
109
0-25-67
105
नं० 21 संगनबासू
0-59-97
108
0-48-15
116
वन्तलौ
0-87-17
107
0-03-92
102
0-06-95
22
117
0-06-44
0-23-49
21
0-28-63
118
0-23-84
17
119
0-11-68
0-20-73
16
125
0-06-53
0-31-09
18
0-25-76
124
0-40-77
15
0-04-33
126
3-78-89
कुल
0-26-75
123
0-27-03
136
0-06-32
30
नं० 62कुन्डुमराना-
0-07-77
0-38-64
141
25
पल्ली
0-59-08
143
24
0-13-11
0-01-76
0-04-61
23
146
0-01-26
0-08-95
147
39
0-15-77
0-21-00
148
40
0-25-65
0-21-48
21
164
2333 Gi/2003-15 5990
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )]
2
5 1
2
1
3
4
5
3
4
342
0-24-09
7
0-02-71 धर्मपुरी ढेनकनि नं० 62 कुन्डुमराना-
धर्मपुरी ढेनकनि नं० 62 कुन्डुमराना-
328
0-17-88
पल्ली
कोटई
कोटई
पल्ली
8
0-07-36
0-38-14
329
18
0-40-43
0-06-56
330
0-10-09
17
370
0-52-54
15
0-16-43
371
0-27-60
13
0-06-13
10-48-55
14
0-05-55
कुल
267
0-03-86
9
0-36-14
नं० 75गोला हल्ली
0-03-51
10
50
0-00-17
0-63-30
51
13
0-29-61
0-04-61
268
0-00-38
12
269
0-19-97
14
52
0-17-02
1-27-53
कुल
279
0-01-70
0-34-62
318
धर्मपुरी दनकनि नं० 16 कोमरनपल्ली
54
0-02-83
कोटई
319
0-17-71
0-27-37
53
315
0-19-68
280
0-16-36
312
0-14-55
282
0-04-02
297
0-21-07
0-34-42
287
298
0-12-74
286
0-09-07
299
0-14-82
0-06-87
289
0-14-63
300
288 0-47-16
0-04-40
301
296
0-08-57
302
0-18-76
295
0-19-57
280
0-19-57
294
0-17-72
0-28-29
272
293
0-25-19
271
0-53-98
317
0-27-08
270
0-22-45
318
0-09-95
269
0-43-12
319
261
0-20-22
98
0-09-89
262
0-39-00
99
0-46-35
263
0-39-36
101
0-43-05
0-04-67
258
116
0-08-88
0-00-84
255
117
0-63-77
256
0-41-98
118
0-19-58
253
0-28-14
253
0-42-64
5-14-60
254
0-47-89
कुल
255
0-53-31
143
0-32-87
नं० 76 मुथानहल्ली
256
0-33-64
132
0-45-40 344
0-13-85
133
0-26-30
0-26-58
343
127
0-31-39 5991 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
1
2
4
3
2
4
5
5
3
1
सेलम
0-00-61
82
बोमल्लूर नं ० 41 बालबक्की
128
0-28-08
धर्मपुरी दनकनि नं० 76 मुथानहल्ली
81
0-01-87
123
0-32-82
कोटई
0-18-35
78
0-33-53
122
77
0-19-11
121
0-05-13
76
0-21-73
114
0-25-73
67
0-05-33
0-05-35
113
75
0-07-51
0-00-61
111
56
0-30-85
38
0-03-09
55
0-54-99
0-54-17
100
0-43-75
29
41
0-14-25
30
0-23-08
42
0-36-61
45
0-35-97
43
0-71-21
44
89
0-26-17
45
41
0-22-35
0-17-88
48
0-25-28
40
0-53-94
0-39-68
49
3-35-07
कुल
50
0-44-37
0-45-66
488
नं० 23 कज्जनयक्कन
52
0-45-44
0-01-68
487
पट्टी
56
0-10-45
492
0-02-98
0-17-36
60
461
0-29-96
0-45-34
13
460
0-35-24
0-48-41
11
0-42-33
458
10
0-70-52
455
0-50-13
7
0-39-74
0-42-86
412
5
0-00-35
411
0-00-24
4
0-19-39
413
0-76-63
3
0-23-66
407
0-12-05
8
0-54-01
414
0-07-67
1
0-23-59
406
0-39-31
10-47-65
कुल
In Bet Svy No.
0-29-93
19
नं० 74पिललारी
406&418 0-07-57,
0-64-44
18
अग्रहारम्
418
0-52-97
9
0-75-11
419
0-65-12
0-02-36
10
391
0-00-55
7
0-02-72
0-01-08
421
0-04-05
6
422
0-42-33
0-26-67
4
0-12-21
0-24-48
423
3
388
0-06-73
2-17-49
कुल 5992
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[ PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 2
4
3
5
1
2
3
4
5
141
0-08-97
सेलम
सेलम
ओमल्लूर नं ० 71 मुत्लुनयकन
0-55-11
387
ओमल्लूर नं ० 23 कज्जनयक्कान
386
0-35-67
पट्टी
202
0-33-22
पट्टी
0-24-47
0-34-95 385
203
363
0-19-34
204
0-33-09 362
0-28-10
0-17-90
205
365
0-32-45
0-46-81
206
366
0-22-12
0-61-23
208
207
0-54-50
0-45-24
359
209
0-46-75
315
220
0-00-43
0-70-37
311
224
0-07-13
0-15-23
319
223
310
0-67-74
0-52-97
222
0-50-18 309
0-44-87
230
0-02-41 301
0-12-28
In Bet Svy No. 308
0-46-08
230 & 2310-02-32 306
0-77-61
221
261
0-02-13
231
1-08-83 260
0-30-01
0-52-41
233
246
0-46-60
0-55-77
234
247
0-15-29
237
0-09-41 248
0-16-48
236
0-01-02
0-54-60
166
238
0-47-94 167
0-67-83
244
0-50-23 170
0-67-83
248
(0-91-15 171
0-00-45
246
0-20-94 172
0-54-55
0-03-56
247
173
0-37-86
10-87-63
कुल
204
0-35-43
59
0-18-74
तथोयारपट्टी
203
0-15-82
57
0-35-78 175
0-46-14
56
0-93-87 192
0-02-05
0-35-72
55
0-69-61
193
1-84-11
0-00-29
191
कुल
0-23-85
194
0-74-27
227
न. 74कोनगपडी
228
0-53-37
18-23-50
कुल
0-05-63
229
145
0-99-25
नं० 71 मुत्नुनयकन
219
146
0-44-11
पट्टी
0-69-39
218
144
0-08-61
0-59-33
214
0-36-69
143
215
0-05-85 139
0-48-35
0-42-16
0-13-60
158
140 5993 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
1
1
2
3
4
5
2
3
5
4
सेलम
132
0-69-10
0-39-52 ओमल्लूर न. 74 कोनगपडी
ईरोड़ पेरुन्दुरै न. 95 तेनमुगम बेल्लोड़ 544
In Bet Svy No.
0-34-63
543
132 & 133 0-06-27
540
0-37-88
133
0-19-85
0-04-83
541
134
0-01-91
535
135
0-53-04
522
0-40-98
0-07-83
0-83-44
122
523
0-31-78
524
5-15-15
कुल
525
0-60-45
520
0-02-05
नं. 86 ढसविलक्कु
515
0-04-74
583
0-00-22
516
0-77-90
584
0-27-06
478
0-57-28
0-60-89
582
479
0-04-61
475
565
0-49-54
0-35-52
474
0-41-97
0-01-01
564
468
0-85-02
587
0-13-41
467
0-13-47
0-85-62
594
0-31-80
469
595
0-35-95
470
0-59-99
593
0-00-32
421
0-03-22
655
0-73-92
420
0-06-18
654
0-31-19
0-06-20
423
653
0-32-44
0-07-82
422
645
0-48-62
432-
0-49-37
646
0-42-83
10-00-97
कुल
647
0-48-33
9
0-27-33
न. 102 मुक़ासी
637
0-46-03
11
0-37-08
पुलव-पालयम
0-28-67
636
10
0-02-92
635
0-39-97
0-01-33
12
276
0-30-59
0-03-01
14
274
0-18-46
0-09-71
7
6
0-68-48
0-31-15
275
0-02-20
18
268
0-34-51
0-02-71
19
269
0-09-58
0-62-07
20
7-92-56
कुल
21
0-69-31
0-04-93
ईरोड़ पेरुन्दुरै न. 95 तेनमुगम वेल्लोड़ 285
35
0-04-34
288
0-41-59
36
0-94-13
289
0-32-11
0-58-34
39
0-34-93
290
0-08-27
44
296
0-36-24
49
0-36-86
0-04-69
0-24-17
48
295
50
294
0-50-33
5-19-16
545
0-53-06
कुल 5994
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
1
2
4
3
5
1
2
0-40-45
170
नमक्कल तिरुचेन्गोड न. 20 कोक्कारयन-
नमक्कल तिरुचेन्गोड न. 20 कोक्कारयन-
0-20-49
पेटई 170/2A
170/1 0-42-45
161
0-25-63
0-08-89
162/ 1A
162/ 1B3 0-08-02
162/2B 0-07-23
162/3C 0-13-07
162/4 0-05-69
162/3B
163
0-58-10
164/ 1E 0-00-21
164/1D 0-04-33
164/1C 0-03-49
164/1B 0-04-09
164/1A 0-01-78
0-01-52
164/1J
155/4 0-11-71
155/7 0-07-83
155/8A 0-15-62
155/8B 0-01-13
0-00-63
155/2A
155/2B 0-01-42
154
0-06-61
138/Pt 0-86-98
137/1 0-21-64
137/4A2 0-02-08
137/4A3 0-03-47
131/1 0-00-87
130/3 0-30-54
130/2 0-10-73
105/Pt 0-00-30
130/1 0-08-20
106/1 0-50-44
129/Pt 0-00-27
106/2B 0-42-04
0-00-21
106/2A
107
0-04-80
103/3 0-30-12
97/2
0-07-61
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3
4
5
0-76-37
97/1
96/1
पेटई
0-23-15
38/Pt 0-02-95
39/3
0-25-79
39/2
0-37-31
89/ 1A 0-55-29
88/a
0-30-04
41
0-32-35
42/2
0-43-62
42/1
0-11-62
25/2
0-03-21
25/ 1A 0-21-42
25/ 1B1 0-23-33
24
0-04-53
28/Pt 0-06-23
44/Pt 0-04-61
23
0-49-16
22/2H 0-07-49
0-00-21
45/Pt
22/2E 0-31-95
22/2D 0-27-03
22/2C 0-12-26
22/2B 0-02-50
22/1
0-02-88
6
0-22-45
5/3B 0-17-11
7
0-48-58
14/6
0-23-36
14/3
0-08-83
14/4
0-21-90
14/2 0-06-40
14/1
0-03-26
11/ 1B 0-20-68
11 /2A 0-14-84
11 /2B 0-12-14
11/2C 0-13-46
12/ 1A 0-30-10
12/ 1B 0-00-10
13-69-03
कुल
[फा. सं.- एल-14014/26/03-जी.पी.]
स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5995
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
1
2
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2003
3
4
5
0-08-93
48
Hosur 130. Thyara-
Dharam-
52
0-16-55
nadurgam
puri
53
0-31-20
61
0-07-30
58
0-09-08 S.O. 2466. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of natural gas through Kochi- Kayamkulam -Bangalore Pipeline Sector under National Gas Grid Project in the State of Tamilnadu , a pipeline with provision of laying additional pipelines and associated facilities should be laid by the GAIL (India ) Limited;
62 0-00-46
59
0-00-72
56
0-03-58
57
0-06-50 And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
55
0-11-06
93
0-03-70
922
0-35-09
921
0-04-08
923
0-02-59 Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
919
0-42-59
918
0-40-53.
0-26-28
909
910
0-03-51
884
0-17-42
0-07-46
885
887
0-00-52 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited , Cauveri Basin, 19 , Perumal East Street, Nagapattinam -611001 (Tamil Nadu).
883
0-10-03 SCHEDULE
879
0-31-56
Area
Survey No./
Village
876
0-28-49 Sl . District Taluk No.
878
Hect .Area Sq . Mtrs
873
0-18-64 2
1
4
3
5
874
0-23-32
36
0-58-96
Dharampuri Hosur 130. Thyara-
872
0-07-96
0-04-55
nadurgam 32
1053
0-11-50
31
0-42-85
870
0-11-98
33
0-16-88
869
0-57-23
28
0-06-07
853
0-29-43
29
0-11-55
852
0-54-50
27
0-05-03
831
0-02-74
26
0-43-50
830
0-14-41
0-25-18
21.
829
17
0-18-89
826
0-25-51
16
0-08-26
825
0-01-26
13
0-09-71
824
0-11-53
12
0-12-48
822
0-53-18
11
0-21-48
953
0-41-78
10
0-07-59
956
0-07-81
0-11-86
47
957
0-00-81 5996
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3
4
5
5
3
2
4
1
955
0-58-63
0-01-02 Dharam- Hosur 130. Thyara-
Hosur 132 -Uddanapalli 1071
Dharam-
0-00-36
0-05-44
1073
puri
nadurgam 962
puri
1072
0-30-63 980
0-40-30
997
0-30-43
979
0-25-36
998
0-07-13
978
0-07-06
999
0-13-84
987
995
0-30-31 988
0-34-55
0-06-31
994
1018
0-11-30
972
0-35-79 1016
0-25-62
0-00-76
960
1017
0-31-94
0-38-85
959
0-65-51
1026
958
0-41-49
0-03-06
1025
957
0-43-05 1029
0-25-91
956
0-02-94 1028
0-04-84
955
0-33-45
0-30-10
1030
954
0-40-31 1024
0-16-30
1169
0-97-99
252
0-00-13
14-33-36
Total
253
1143
Dharampuri Hosur Uddanapalli
271
0-13-69 1142
0-16-91
269
0-03-01 1141
0-26-71
0-06-59
270
1138
0-24-99
272
1139
0-19-61
305
0-46-08 1140
0-09-98
0-07-11
275
1134
0-00-12
304
0-01-37
0-05-39 1135
277
0-27-51
303
0-32-76 1136
0-03-19
302
0-19-27
0-04-43
1133
0-38-63
1159
0-12-34
1132
286
0-23-81
0-17-93
1131
287
0-13-18
0-11-18
1114
0-09-35
158
0-07-24
1113
161
0-01-17
0-05-70
1115
159
0-24-14 1100
0-10-88
0-28-73
160
1099
0-23-99
166
0-43-24
0-04-39
1097
0-20-75
165
1096
0-34-01
0-16-95
172
0-45-54
1079
198
0-75-27 1074
0-14-25
191
0-07-12 5997
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2
3
4
5
5
3
4
1
1
2
848
0-31-20
0-56-26
98-Achettipalli
192
No. 132Uddahapalli
850
193
0-35-55
678
0-07-48
0-11-51
189
679
194
188
0-47-69
680
0-25-94
686
0-12-40
13-43-10
Total
0-36-82
687
0-31-48
539
98-Achettipalli
688
0-05-73
540
0-01-56
0-23-41
689
0-08-71
537
713
0-13-90
0-59-30
535
0-05-70
0-00-96
691
534
0-21-36
711
0-08-94
1012
706
0-26-35
0-14-22
1013
0-10-57
705
0-09-38
1014
0-04-49
707
0-16-43
1015
1016
0-15-30
0-30-49
702
0-09-80
1017
701
0-32-45
1018
0-06-38
851
0-00-59
1006
Total 10-20-54
0-14-44
1005
Dhara- Hosur No. 93 Nagondapalli622
0-46-66
1004
621
0-50-48
mapuri
0-17-28
1003
620
0-35-74
0-24-92
1002
616
0-55-40
0-50-93
1001
0-15-08
614
775
0-39-31
0-37-49
613
823
0-52-13
0-62-24
610
0-27-65
822
0-15-39
0-34-38
817
561
813
0-47-99
558
0-03-50
0-02-43
814
557
0-18-24
816
0-15-25
0-24-13
559
815
0-15-79
Total
3-62-28
819
0-16-76
0-27-83
223
Hosur 91 Poona-
Dharam-
0-05-13
808
222
palli
apuri
0-03-07
807
0-58-47
221
0-41-19
806
0-80-26
863
842
0-24-14
0-01-82
240
0-38-58
843
0-06-07
256
853
0-22-01
0-02-34
862
852
0-36-21
0-17-33
271
0-04-31
849
2333 GI/2003-16 5998
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
5
2
3
4
5
1
4
1
2
3
0-28-74
Pala
Dharma
0-03-34
InBet
91. Poonapalli 154 91-Poonapalli
SvyNo.
139 0-00-54
puri
0-29-27
269
0-26-56
160
0-50-64
272
0:00-13
161
0-28-59
273
0-12-10
164
274
0-21-08
168 0-16-59
275
0-01-65
167
0-19-31
0-01-92
281
171
280
0-45-69
172
0-17-46
295
0-26-87
119
0-07-28
296
0-22-86
96
0-05-64
422
0-05-84
95
0-00-12
394
0-08-48
0-01-15
97
395
0-16-51
94
0-40-86
398
0-18-71
0-08-97
98
93
0-11-46
399
402
92
0-09-58
0-02-16
0-31-16
79
0-46-34
400
401
0-21-77
0-02-07
80
0-01-24
406
0-22-09
78
0-01-97
InBet.
81
0-42-85 Svy no.
10-66-15
Total
413
0-22-39
Dharma- Pala- No. 23 Settihalli 453
412
0-08-97
Kodu
puri
410
0-05-41
451
0-89-72
411
0-14-81
450
0-15-52
409
0-01-41
448
0-40-89
691
0-28-46
432
0-30-90
0-19-30
213
431
695
430
0-10-17
0-32-55
696
429
0-23-72
0-09-35
0-33-18
698
428
0-11-75
425
0-06-66
699
0-03-60
404
700
0-38-67
336
0-39-66
703
0-08-02
337
702
0-25-78
0-10-52
318
0-25-76
197
0-05-31
316
0-39-21
704
0-00-41
315
0-23-99
143
0-07-15
310
0-23-30
196
0-00-11
308
0-23-17
195
0-11-76
306
0-25-96
144
0-43-72 5999 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
1
2
4
3
5
4
1
2
3
5 302
0-10-11
No. 2 Settihalli
Dharma- Palą
232
0-13 301
0-17-98
231
0-22 puri
kodu
300
0-03-74
229
399
225
347
0-32-28
245
299
0-16-88
230
0-36
0-08-07
298
247
048 348
0-04-57
0-31
274
0-07-38
0-07
252
InBet
SvyNo.
253
0-29
60
0-14-93
0-26
Dharma- Pala- No. 88 Jakkasa- 271
62
0-32-74
246
Kodu mudram
puri
63
0-15-39
272
0-23-80
64
0-13
0-67-92
273
65
0-53
268
0-25-14
66
0-06
0-00-65
266
67
0-11
0-00-66
65
90
0-26
64
0-00-62
68
66
0-02-14
0-16
88
267
0-11-94
87
0-25
67
0-83-25
86
0-38
59
0-45-76
0-06
74
60
0-02-09
75
0-10
58
0-13-41
35
0-15
363
0-59-37
21
0-03
364
0-26-79
0-20
23
0-42-93
365
0-20
22
0-54-25
361
0-08
25
360
0-11-25
28
359
0-16-07
26
0-02
8-60-75
Total
0-39
27
0-94-59
Dharma- Pala- No. 81 Chudanur 257
0-17
InBet
251
0-27-16
Kodu
puri
Svv. No.
0-27-56
255
10-81
Total
0-76-63
252
218
0-23
No. 88Jakka-
0-09-55
253
samudram 219
0-13
0-25-20
243
223
0-38
244
0-15-39 222
0-21
0-43-80
242
234
0-27
0-02-67
238
0-28
233
239
0-46-28 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 6000
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
4
5 4
5
3
3
2
1
2
1
0-02-46
0-30-32 237
Pala-
Dharma-
476
No. 21 Sangan-
0-00-76 236
basuvantalau 474
0-03-62
Kodu
puri
233
0-23-46
187
0-64-26
234
0-28-58
188
0-50-39
235
0-12-34
189
0-17-31
4-89-66
336
Total
0-25-59
335
0-34-23
9. Dhar- Pala-
No. 83 Mahendra - 6
Kodu
mapuri
manglam
0-21-12
334
7
0-01-20
0-01-33
327
5
0-67-22
0-59-96
328
10-46-94
18
0-02-14
401
0-53-37
19
329
0-23-31
0-12-72
20
0-28-42
21
7-38-28
Total
33
0-05-76
No. 70 Karukka- 113
11. Dhar- Denka-
0-17-20
0-55-64
34
112
nahalli
nikotta
mapuri
0-13-49
111
2-67-06
Total
0-15-37
110
0-25-67
Pala-
Dharma-
No. 21 Sangan- 105
0-48-15
Kodu
116
0-00-28 basuvantalau
109
puri
102
0-03-92
0-59-97
108
0-06-44
117
0-87-17
107
0-28-63
118
0-06-95
22
0-11-68
119
0-23-49
21
125
0-06-53
0-23-84
. 17
0-25-76
124
0-20-73
16
0-04-33
126
0-31-09
18
0-26-75
123
0-40-77
15
136
0-27-03
3-78-89
Total
0-38-64
141
0-06-32
Den- No. 62 Kunduma- 30
0-59-08
143
0-07-77
ranapalli 25
kanikotta
12. Dhar mapuri
146
0-01-76
24
0-13-11
0-08-95
147
0-04-61
23
0-21-00
148
0-01-26
39
164
0-21-48
0-15-77
40
155
0-14-82
0-25-65
21
0-02-71
163
7
0-02-71
162
0-25-00
0-07-36
8
161
0-17-35
0-40-43
18
0-03-26
176
0-10-09
17
181
0-63-12 6001
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1
3
4
2
5
4
2
3
5
1
0-36-14
13. Dhar- Den-
No. 75 Gollahalli 9
0-16-43
12. Dhar- Den- No. 62 Kunduma- 15
10
kanikotta
0-03-51
mapuri
0-06-13
nahalli ranapalli 13
mapuri kanikotta
13
0-63-30
0-05-55
14
0-03-86
267
0-04-61
12
0-00-17
50
0-19-97
14
0-29-61
51
Total 1-27-53
0-00-38
268
318
Den-
0-34-62
14. Dhar-
No. 6
269
kani
0-17-71
319
Komaranapalli
mapuri
52
0-17-02
0-19-68
315
kotta
0-01-70
279
0-02-83
54
312
0-14-55
0-27-37
53
0-21-07
297
280
0-16-36
0-12-74
298
0-04-02
282
299
0-14-82
0-34-42
287
300
0-14-63
286
0-09-07
0-04-40
301
0-06-87
289
0-47-16
288
302
0-18-76
296
0-08-57
0-19-57
280
0-19-57
295
0-28-29
272
0-17-72
294
271
0-53-98
293
0-25-19
270
0-22-45
0-27-08
317
0-09-95
318
269
0-43-12
319
261
0-20-22
0-09-89
98
262
0-39-00
0-46-35
99
263
0-39-36
0-43-05
101
258 0-04-67
0-08-88
116
0-63-77
0-00-84
117
255
0-19-58
118
256
0-41-98
253
042-64
253
0-28-14
0-47-89
254
5-14-60
Total
0-53-31
255
143
0-32-87
15. Dhar- Den-
No. 76
256
0-33-64
0-45-40
kani- Muttana Halli 132
0-13-85
344
mapuri
0-26-30
0-26-58
343
kotta
133
0-24-09
342
127
0-31-39
328
0-17-88
128
0-28-08
329
0-38-14
123
0-32-82
0-06-56
330
122
0-33-53
0-52-54
370
121
0-05-13
0-27-60
371
0-25-73
114
Total 10-48-55 6002
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
2
1
3
4
5
1 15. Dharma- Den-
113
No. 76
0-50-35
[PART II SEC. 3( ii )] 3
5 2
4
17. Salem Omalur
kani-
0-00-61
Muttana Halli 111
puri
kotta
38
0-03-09
100
0-54-17
41
0-14-25
42
0-36-61
43
0-71-21
89
0-26-17
45
0-22-35
48
0-25-28
49
0-39-68
50
0-44-37
52
0-45-44
56
0-10-45
60
0-17-36
13
0-45-34
11
0-48-41
0-70-52
10
7
0-39-74
0-00-35
5
4
0-19-39
3
0-23-66
8
0-54-01
0-23-59
1
10-47-65
Total
0-29-93 16. Dhar- Den-
No.74
19
kani-
18
0-64-44
Pillari
mapuri
kotta
0-75-11
Agraharam 9
10
0-02-36
7
0-02-72
6
0-04-05
0-26-67
4
3
0-12-21
Total 2-17-49
41Balbakki 82
0-00-61 17. Salem Omalur
81
0-01-87
0-18-35
78
77
0-19-11
76
0-21-73
67
0-05-33
75
0-07-51
56
41Balbakki
0-30-85
55
0-54-99
29
0-43-75
30
0-23-08
45
0-35-97
44
41
0-17-88
40
0-53-94
3-35-07
Total
0-45-66
488
18. Salem Omalur No. 23 Kanjanyа-
487
0-01-68 akkanpatti
492
0-02-98
461
0-29-96
460
0-35-24
458
0-42-33
455
0-50-13
412
0-42-86
411
0-00-24
0-76-63
413
407
0-12-05
414
0-07-67
406
0-39-31
In Bet Svy No.
0-07-57
406&418
418
0-52-97
0-65-12
419
0-00-55
391
421
0-01-08
422
0-42-33
423
0-24-48
0-06-73
388
387
0-55-11
386
0-35-67
0-24-47
385
363
0-19-34
362
0-28-10
365
0-32-45
366
0-61-23
0-45-24
359
315
0-46-75
311
0-70-37
319
0-15-23 6003
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3
4
5
5
1
2
2
3
1
4
224
0-67-74
0-07-13
No. 71
19. Salem Omalır
18. Salem Omalur No. 23 Kanjanya- 310
0-52-97
0-44-87
223 akkanpatti 309
Muthunaya
301
0-12-28
222
0-50-18
kanpatti
308
0-46-08
0-02-41
230
0-77-61
306
InBet Svy No.
0-02-32
230& 231
0-02-13
261
221
0-30-01
260
231
1-08-83
0-46-60
246
233
0-52-41
247
0-15-29
234
0-55-77
0-16-48
248
237
0-09-41
166
0-54-60
236
167
0-34-40
0-01-02
0-47-94
238
170
0-67-83
244
0-50-23
0-00-45
171
0-91-15
248
0-54-55
172
0-37-86
0-20-94
173
246
204
0-35-43
247
0-03-56
203
0-15-82
10-87-63
Total
175
0-46-14
0-18-74
20. Salem Omalur No. 42 Tattiyanpatti 59
0-02-05
192
57
0-35-78
0-69-61
193
56
0-93-87
0-00-29
191
55
0-35-72
0-23-85
194
Total 1-84-11
18-23-50
Total
0-74-27
0-99-25
145
No. 71
21. Salem Omalur No. 74 Konagapadi 227 19. Salem Omalur
0-53-37
0-44-11
228
146
Muthunaya-
0-08-61
144
0-05-63
229 kanpatti
0-36-69
143
219
139
0-48-35
0-69-39
218
0-42-16
140
214
0-59-33
141
0-08-97
215
0-05-85
202
0-33-22
158
0-13-60
0-34-95
203
132
0-69-10
0-33-09
204
In Bet Svy No. 132& 133
0-06-27
205
0-17-90
33
0-19-85
206
0-46-81
0-01-91
134
0-22-12
208
0-53-04
135
0-54-50
207
0-83-44
122
209
5-15-15
Total
0-00-43
220 6004
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii )] 1
4
2
3
5
1
4
2
3
5 86 Dasavilaku 520
0-02-05
22. Salem Omalur
0-57-28
23.ErodePerun- No . 95 Thenmugam 478
583
0-00-22
0-04-61
Vellode 479
durai
584
0-27-06
475
0-35-52 582
0-60-89
474
0-41-97 565
0-49-54
468
0-85-02 564
0-01-01
467
0-13-47 587
0-13-41
469
0-31-80
0-85-62
594
470
0-59-99
0-35-95
595
i
421
0-03-22 593
0-00-32
420
0-06-18 655
0-73-92
423
0-06-20 654
0-31-19
653
0-07-82
422
0-32-44
0-48-62
645
432
0-49-37 646
0-42-83
10-00-93
Total
647
0-48-33
0-27-23
No. 102 Mukasí 9
637
0-46-03
0-37-08
Pulavapalayam 11
636
0-28-67
10
0-02-92 635
0-39-97
0-01-33
12
0-30-59
276
14
0-03-01 274
0-18-46
7
0-09-71 275
0-31-15
6
0-68-48 268
0-34-51
18
0-02-20 269
0-09-58
19
0-02-71
7-92-56
Total
0-62-07
20
285
23. Erode Perun- No. 95
0-04-93
0-69-31
21
durai
0-41-59
Thenmugam 288
35
0-04-34 289
0-32-11
Vellode
290
36
0-34-93
0-94-13 296
0-36-24
39
0-58-34
0-04-69
295
44
0-08-27
0-50-33
294
0-36-86
49
0-53-06
545
48
0-24-17 544
0-39-52
50
543
0-34-63
Total 5-19-16 540
0-37-88
170
0-40-45
25. Namak- Thiruch- No. 20
541
0-04-83
kal
0-20-49
172/2A
Kokhar
engode
535
170/1
0-42-45
yanpettai
522
0-40-98
161
0-25-63 523
0-07-83
0-08-89
162/ 1A
0-31-78
524
162/ 1B3
0-08-02
0-60-45
525
0-07-23
162/2B
515
0-04-74
162/3C
0-13-07
0-77-90
516 6005 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
3
2
1
5
4
3
1
2
0-55-29
89/ 1A
No. 20
Thiruch
0-05-69 Namak-
162/4
Namak- Thiruch- No. 20 Kokharyan
0-30-04:
kal
88/ a
Kokharyan
162/3B
engode
kal
pettai
engode
0-32-35
41
0-58-10
163
pettai
0-43-62
42/2
0-00-21
164/ 1E
0-11-62
42/1
0-04-33
164/1D
0-03-21
0-03-49
25/2
164/1C
0-21-42
0-04-09
25/ 1A
164/1B
0-01-78
0-23-33
25/1B1
164/1A
0-01-52
0-04-53 164/1J
24
0-11-71
155/4
0-06-23
28/Pt
0-07-83
155/7
0-04-61:
44/Pt
0-15-62
155/BA
0-49-19
23
0-01-13
155/8B
0-07-49
22/2H
0-00-63
155/2A
45/Pt
0-00-21.
0-01-42
155/2B
0-31-95-
22/2E
0-06-61
154
0-27-03
22/2D
0-86-98
138/Pt
22/2C
0-12-26
0-21-64
137/1
22/2B
0-02-50%
0-02-08
137/4A2
0-02-88
22/1
0-03-47
137/4A3
0-22-45
6
0-00-87
131/1
0-17-11
5/3B
0-30-54
130/3
0-48-58
7
130/2
0-10-73
0-23-36
14/6
105/Pt
0-08-83
14/3
0-08-20
130/1
0-21-90
14/4
0-50-44
106/1
0-06-40
14/2
0-00-27
129/Pt
0-03-26
14/1
0-42-04
106/2B
0-20-68
11/1B
0-00-21
106/2A
0-14-84
11/2A
0-04-80
107
0-12-14
11/2B
0-30-12
103/3
0-13-46
11/2C
0-07-61
97/2
0-30-10
12/ 1A
0-76-37
97/1
12/ 1B
0-23-15
96/1
13-69-03
Total
0-02-95
38/Pt
0-25-79
39/3
[FileNo. L- 14014/26/03-G.P. ]
0-37-31-
SWAMI SINGH, Director
39/2
2333GI/2003-17 6006
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)]
1
2
3
4
5 नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2003
5. नटवाडे
0
30
60
34
44/पैकी
0
39
96
(लौकी)
1
46/पैकी 0
22
32
50/2/1
0
80
10
0
51/पैकी
11
16 का.आ. 2467.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पानेवाडी ( मनमाड ) संस्थापन से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
9/2/1
0
11
00
0
9/2/2
11
70
9/1/पैकी 0
24
12
0
30/ब/पैकी
29
70
6. सुले
30/ब/9. पैकी 0 20
42 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके नीचे उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
30/ब/ 11 पैकी 0
34
11
30/ब/ 13 पैकी 0 24
66
30/ब/ 10 पैकी 0
15
48
20पैकी
0
60
50
25पैकी 0 08 44 अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
58/4
0
20
7. हाडाखेड
00
8. सांगवी
25
7/पैकी
0
38
[फा. नं. आर-31015/14/2001 /ओ आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 19thAugust , 2003 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दिये जाने की तारीख से, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री प्रहलाद वी. काचरे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुंबई -मनमाड पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, कार्यालय पहली मंजिल, सेवा कॉम्पलेक्स, गुरुद्वारा के सामने , मुबंई- आगरा मार्ग , धूले 424311 (महाराष्ट्र) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
तहसील: शिरपुर
राज्य: महाराष्ट्र
अनुसूची जिला: धुलिया
S.O. 2467.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport petroleum products from the Panewadi (Manmad) terminal in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline to Manglya (Indore) in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
नाम ग्राम का
गट/सर्वे नंबर
चौरस मी.
क्षेत्र आर
हैक्टर
1
2
3
4
5
1. थालनेर
280/2
0
07
40
408/2
0
28
80
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such extension pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
413/1पैकी 0
02
40
0
393/1पैकी
02
88
16
186
0
74
2. ताजपुरी
0
157/ब/ 1 ब
14
28
0
102
05
17
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
90पैकी
0
04
48
3. गरताड
44/1पैकी 0
05
56
0
4. दहिवद
137
02
16
00
0
282/पैकी
90
08
285/3/4 0
18
373पैकी 0
10
32
385/3/1 पैकी 0 05
22
544/1+2पैकी 0 05
76
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty -one -days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipline under the landto Shri Prahalad V. Kachare , Competent Authority, Mumbai -Manmad Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited at office at 1st Floor, Seva Complex, Opp. Gurudwara, Mumbai - Agra Road, Dhule- 424311 (Maharashtra) .
6007
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
Tahsil : Shirpur District : Dhule State : Maharashtra
उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;..
Hect. Ares Area
Gat/Survey Numbers
Sq.Mts .
Name of Village
4
5
3
1
2
07
0
40
280/2
1. Thalner
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय कीघोषणा करती है;
80
408/2
028
0 02
40
413/1 Pt.
88
0
02
393/1 Pt.
74
0
16
186
2. Tajpuri
()
14
28
157/B/ 1B
(0
17
05
102
04
48
(0
90Pt.
05
56
0.
3. Gartad
44/1 Pt .
16
()
02
137
4. Dahiwad
90
()
00
282/P
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, भारत के राजपत्र में , यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दिये जाने की तारीख से, ( 21 ) इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में, श्री प्रहलाद वी. काचरे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुंबई- मनमाड़ पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, शिबीर कार्यालय , पहली मंजिल, गुलाब बिल्डिंग विजय ममता थिएटर के सामने, नासिक- पुणे रोड, शिवाजी नगर, नासिक-422006 (महाराष्ट्र) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
18
08-
285/A/4 0
10
32
()
373 Pt.
अनुसूची
22
05
385/3/1 Pt. 0
76
05
जिला: नासिक राज्य: महाराष्ट्र
तहसील: मालेगाव
544/ 1+2 Pt ( )
60
30
()
34
5. Natwade
39
()
44/P
(Lauki)
क्षेत्र आर चौरस मी.
हैक्टर
गट/सर्वे नंबर
ग्राम का नाम
32
22
(0
46/P
80
()
10.
50/2/1
5
4
3
2
1
()
16
11
51 /P
38
0
33
00
52भाग
11.
( )
1. चोंढी
9/2/1
70
(0
9/2/2
11
08
05
0
451 भाग
2. जव्ठगाव (निं)
12
24
()
9/ 1 /P
77
0
07
380/2भाग
70
29
(0
30/B/P
6. Sule
00
03
0
35/1 भाग
42
3. कालेवाडी
20
()
30/B/9P
34
0
00
03
11
30/B/ 11P (0
35/2भाग
()
66
24
30 /B/ 13P
20
10
0
25/1 भाग
4. घोडेगाव
15
48
30/B/10P ()
07
87
0
79/1 भाग
50
10
60
20 Pt .
44
08
()
25 PL.
05
60
0
53/1अ भाग
5. मेहुणे
00
(0
20 .
34 58/4
07
55/3.भाग. 0
7 Hadakhed
38
(0
25
7/PL .
64
11 8. Sangvi
56/1/2भाग 0
13
0
16
109भाग
File No. R-31015/ 14/2001 -OR - II] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secу.
0
01
06
193 भाग
6. चंदनपुरी
03
57
0
188/3 भाग
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
40
0
16
119/1 भाग
06
56
0
119/2भाग
56
0
06
119/3 भाग
1
0
50
09
89/1 भाग
49
0
09
89/2भाग
का.आ. 2468.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पानेवाडी ( मनमाड ) संस्थापन से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
50
09
89/3भाग 0
07
70
0
107 भाग
7. मालधे
72
11
106(ब) भाग 0
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से 6008
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 203 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
5
1
2
3
4
0
10
44
४. सवंदगाव
92भाग
0
66
03
109/अ भाग
(Manmad) terminal in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline to Manglya ( Indore ) in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
06
33
194/3 भाग 0
9. सायने बुदुख
0
12
12
168/2भाग
24
0 14
278/2 भाग
10. माल्हणगाव
99
0
13
101/3 भाग
Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such extension pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user ( ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
0
06
20
90/1भाग
07
80
0
90/4भाग
0
43
13
11. चिखलओहोल 483/अ भाग
0
09
00
484/ ब भाग
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - Section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
04
54
401/1 भाग 0
54
01
371/1/2 भाग 0
56
08
12. नाले
175/ 1 ब/ 1 भाग 0
56
08
175/ 1 ब/2 भाग 0
0
10
68
36/1भाग
07
26
36/2/2भाग 0
05
40
39/2भाग 0
40
05
48/1भाग 0
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the plpline under the land to Shri Prahalad V. Kachare , Competent Authority, Mumbai -Manmad Pipeline Extension Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Linuted at Office at Ist Floor, Gulab Building, Opp .Vijay Mamata Theatre , Nashik-Pune Road, Shivaji Nagar , Nashik -422006 (Maharashtra) .
39
04
13. देवरपाडे
197/1 अ भाग 0
SCHEDULE
07
00
197/2भाग 0
Tahsil : Malegaon District : Nashik State : Maharashtra 0
08
62
186/3 भाग
34
04
184/2भाग 0
Gat/Survey Numbers Hect.
Area Ares Sq.Mts .
Name of Village
60
13
184/4 भाग 0
4
5
3
2
1
17
00
0
176
38
33
0
52Pt .
1. Chondi
08
00
14. भिलकोट 45/1अ/1 भाग 0
05
0
08
2. Jalgaon (N)
451 Pt .
00
0
08
92/1 भाग
07
77
0
380/Pt .
0
07
20
123/भाग
0
03
00
3. Kalewadi 35/1 Pt .
09
27
00
0
03 153/2 भाग 0
35/2 Pt .
0
20
10
48
25/1 Pt .
07
4. Ghodegaon
0
303/3भाग
15. गुगलवाड
0
07
87
79/1 Pt.
07
87
309/2भाग 0
60
0
05
53/1A Pt.
5. Mehune
36
17
282/2/3 भाग 0
0
07
34
55/3 Pt .
60
09
243/1 भाग 0
0
11
64
56/1/2Pt.
13
0
16
00
109 Pt.
0
03
16. पलासदरे
93/2भाग
0
06
01
70
0
10
6. Chandanpuri
193 Pt.
104/2भाग
0
03
57
188/3 Pt .
40
07
173/13/1 भाग 0
40
16
0
119/1 Pt .
56
0
06
119/2 Pt .
[फा. सं. आर-31015/10/2001 - ओ आर- II]
0
56
06
119/3 P.
50
0
09
89/1 Pt .
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
0
49
09
89/2Pt .
0
09
50
89/3 Pt .
70
07
0
107 Pt.
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2003
7. Maldhe
0
72
11
106(B)Pt.
10
0
44
8. Savandgaon
92Pt.
66
0 03
109/A Pt .
S.O. 2468. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum products from the Panewadi [ भाम II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6009
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
1
2
4
5
3
0
06
33
194/3Pt .
9. Sayane
0
Budruk
12
12
168/2Pt .
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उस रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाये;
0
14
24
10. Malangaon 278/2 Pt .
0
13
99
101/3 Pt .
0
06
20
90/1 Pt.
0 07
90/4Pt.
80
अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अर्जित किया जाता है ;
0
13
43
11. Chikhal Ohal 483 /A Pt .
0
00
484/B Pt.
09
0
04
54
401/1 Pt.
01
54
0
371/1/2 Pt .
56
08
12.Nale
175/ 1B/ 1 Pt . 0
56
08
175/ 1B /2 Pt . 0
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की बारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 0
10
68
36/1 Pt .
अनुसूची
26
07
36/2/2 Pt . 0
तहसील: मालेगाव जिला: नाशिक राज्य: महाराष्ट्र 0 05
40
39/2Pt.
0
40
05
48/1 Pt .
ग्राम का
04
39
197/ 1A Pt . 0
13. Devarpade
गट/सर्वे नंबर
नाम
चौरसमी.
हैक्टर
क्षेत्र आर 0
07
00
197/2 Pt.
5
4
1
3
2
08
62
186/3 Pt .
00
53
0
04 0
34
04
184/2 Pt.
1.चौढ़ी
00
0
09 ()
13
60
49/1अ
184/4Pt.
00
()
17
101/3/1
176
0
08
46 45/ 1A/ 1 Pt . 0
08
00
0
32 14.Bhilkot
102/2
40
00
08
0
92/1 Pt.
0
01
00
2. जलगाव ( निं ). 485
0
07
20
123/Pt .
0
430/1
17
99 0
27
09
153/2 Pt .
0
435
46
70 0
07
48
303/3 Pt .
15.Gugalwad
0
01
80
183/2
3.कालेवाडी
0
07
87
309/2 Pt .
0
34
13
32
4. कोडेगाव
36
17
282/2B/3 Pt . 0
0
51
01
80:
0
09
60
243/1 Pt.
09
56/2
0
40
5. मेहुणे
00
0
03
93/2 Pt .
16. Palasdare
0
16
01
124/1
70
10
104/2 Pt. 0
0
213/2
12
21
07
40
173/ 1A/ 1 Pt . 0
0
01
52
198पैकी
[File No. R-31015/ 10/2001 -OR - II]
0
16
54
337/2
HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .
0
15
180/1
18 :
6. चंदनपुरी
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
177
06
0
20
0
174/2
17
00
0
136/3
04
80 :
0
136/4
16
83
0
09
134
49
0
121
56
65
0
03
120/4
60
0
10
80
7. मालधे
4/ब/3
0
10
43/4
00
8. सवंदगाँव
0
01
52/ब
10
0
04
12
116
02
0
52
247
का. आ. 2469.- केन्द्रीय सरकार मे पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 1147 तारीख 9 अप्रैल , 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पानेवाडी ( मनमाड ) से मुंबई- मनमाड पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इन्दौर ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषण की थी;
0
21 60
244
0
03
98
160अ-2
9. सामने बुद्रख
0
09
72
10. मालगगाव 30/3/3
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 17 मई 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
30
60
0
30/3/4
0
04
14
298
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 6010
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
SCHEDULE
5
3
4
2
1
Tahsil : Malegoon District : Dhule State :
00
45
0
445/1
11. चिखलओहोल
Maharashtra
0
02
70
11/3/3
12. नाले
Gat/Survey Numbers Hect.
Area Ares Sq.Mts .
Name of Village
0
30
60
163
13. देवरपाडे
4
5
3
2
1
00
04
0
50
0
53
25
14. भिलकोट 45/1अ-3
1.Chondi
00
0
09
49/ 1A
0
54
15
137/1
46
0
08
101/3/1
0
40
32
102/2
0
90
311/1
27
15. गुगलवाड
0 、 01
00
485
00
2. Jalgaon (N)
0
90
311/2
0
17
99
430/1
30
0
303/2
06
46
0
70
435
0
01
80
183/2
3.Kalewadi
जिला: नाशिक
तहसील: नाँदगाँव
राज्य: महाराष्ट्र
0
34
13
32
4. Ghodegaon
80
0
01
51
क्षेत्र
गट/सर्वे
40
09
0
56/2
5. Mehune
चौरस मी.
आर
हैक्टर
ग्राम का नाम
नंबर
0
01
16
124/1B
33
0
195
03
1. नवसरी
0
21
12
213/2
52
01
0
198Pt.
[फा. नंबर आर-31015/ 10/2001- ओ आर- II ]
0
16
54
337/2
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
0
15
18
180/1
6. Chandanpuri
20
06
0
177
0 17- 00
174/2
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2003
0
80
04
136/3
16
0
83
136/4
09
0
49
134
65
56
0
121
60
03
0
120/4
10
0
80
4/B/3
7. Maldhe
00
0
10
43/4
8. Sawandgaon
10
0
01
52/B
04
12
0
116
0
52
247
02
60
21
0
244
98
0
03
160A-2
9. SayaneBk.
09
72
0
30/A/3
10. Malangaon
60
30/A/4
0
30
S.O. 2469. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , Number S.O. 1147 dated the 9th April , 2003 , issued under Sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manmad Pipeline Extension Project from Panewadi (Manmad ) in the State of Maharashtra to Manglya ( Indore ) in the State of Madhya Pradesh by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
0
04
298
14
45
0
-00
445/1
11. Chikhal Ohal
70
02
11/3/3
12.Nale
And, whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 17th May, 2003;
0
30
60
13. Deverpade 163
50
25
45/1A-3 0
14.Bhilkot
54
137/1
0
15
And, whereas , the competent authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;
90
27
0
311/1
15.Gugalwad
0
00
90
311/2
0
30
06
303/2
Tahshil:
State:- Maharashtra
District:- Nashik
Nandgaon
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
Area Ares
Hect.
Sq.Mts .
Gat/ Survey Numbers
Name of Village
5
2
4
3
1
03
0
33
195
1. Navsari
[File No. R-31015/ 10/2001 -OR- II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secу .
And, further , in exercise of the powere conferred by Sub -Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest onthis date of the publication of this declaration , in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003 /भाद्रपद 8 , 1925
6011
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2470.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि केरल राज्य में भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, इरीमपानम, कोचीन के इरीमपानम संस्थापन से मोटर स्प्रिट, उत्कृष्ट किरोसिन तथा उच्च गति डीजल के परिवहन के लिए पेट्रोनेट सी.सी. के. लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अजैन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथाप्रकाशित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के संबंध में श्री के. वादीवेल, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (तामिलनाडू) , कोचीन कोयम्बटूर कैंरूर पाइपलाइन परियोजना प्रथम तम्म " कोवाई टावरस, " सं ० 44 बाला सुन्दरम रोड, कोयम्बटूर 641018 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिल्ला: करूर
राज्य : तमिलनाडु तालुका: करूर
सेत्र
सर्वेक्षण सं
गाँव का नाम
आरे
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेर
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
03
18
0
779-5
आथूर
00
77
0
779-6
00
89
0
779-7
0
32
00
779-9
00
19
0
1102-35
00
06
0
1102-36
05
28
0
1106-A1
00
75
0
1106 -B5 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRAPADA 8 , 1925
6012
जिल्ला: करूर तालुका: अरवकुरूची
सर्वेक्षण सं गाँव का नाम
(2) (1)
740 - A मोन्जानूर ( पश्चिम)
716 - A
738
739
672
686-2 थेत्रीलै (पुर्व)
686-3
686-8
686-9
1384-1
429-2 थेन्नीलै (पश्चिम)
432 - AI
432- A2
633
25 - A4 परमथी
179-3 पुन्नम
179-4
180-4
859 - A2
859 - A3
859 - A7
जिल्ला: ईरोड वलिका: कान्ायम
सर्वेक्षण सं गाँव का नाम
(2)
(1)
686-2 कान्ायम
830-3
920-3
488 वीरनमपालयम
507-1
507-2
516-4
517-1
PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
राज्य: तमिलनाडु
सेत्र
वर्ग मीटर
आरे
हेक्टेर
(5)
(4)
(3)
61
14
(0
02
()
17
01
(0
27
11
()
63
08
0
20
02
(0
50
03
(0
60
01
0
90
01
0
48
02
0
06
93 0
54
04
0
55
00
0
80
06
0
71
02
0
56
00
0
50
00
0
22
03
0
00
61 0
59
00
0
72 (0
(01
राज्य: तमिलनाडु
सेत्र
आरे वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेर
(5)
(4)
(3)
90
00
0
82
01
0
00
05
0
16
02
0
11
01
(0
92
00
0
70
03
0
07
52 0 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्रपद 8 , 1925
[भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(2) (1)
280-7A वीरचोलपुरम
146-2 मेट्टपालयम (पश्चिम)
1016-1
268-5 समबनदमपालयम
जिल्ला: कोयम्बत्तूर तालुका: तिरूपूर
सर्वेक्षण सं गाँव का नाम
(2) (1)
568-1 कन्डीयन कोविल
644-1
644-4
699-18
699 - IC
52-4 अलागुमलै
318-1 अविनाशीपालयम (उत्तर)
322-3D
322-3H
6013
(5 (3)
(4)
95 0
02
02
49 0
()
20
01
55
09
(0
राज्य: तमिलनाडु
सेत्र
वर्ग मीटर
आरे
हेक्टेर
(4)
(5) (3)
81 0
07
(04 0
02
01
(01
(0
-06 0
01
42
01
80
01
()
00
12 0
45
13
0
03
45 0
राज्य: तमिलनाडु
जिल्ला: कोयम्बत्तूर
तालुका: पल्लडम
सेत्र
सर्वेक्षण सं
गाँव का नाम
(2) (1)
337 गनपतिपालयम
354-3
374
378-2
416-3 नारनापुरम
422-1B
434-1
434-2
3-2 ओट्टरपालयम
4-2
75-1B 2333 GI/2003-18
वर्ग मीटर
आरे
हेक्टेर
(5)
(4)
(3)
46
00
0
09
07
0
14
00
0
45
08
0
16
01
0
42
04
0
04
01
0
42
02
0
05 0
00
20
00
0
00
01
0 6014
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRAPAD A8 , 1925
(1)
(2) पट्टनम
47 - IC.
47-20
48-3
90-3C इरूगूर
511 - IA
581 / 2B
584
586/4 तालुका : कोयम्बत्तूर दक्षिण
जिल्ला: कोयम्बत्सूर
गाँव का नाम
सर्वेक्षण सं (1)
(2)
352- IC सर्कार अग्रहार वेल्ललुर
शीरापालयम
554-3 मलुमिच्चमपट्टी
547-3A
581-1A2A
581 - IBI
600-1C1
600 - IC2 मधुक्करै
255-1
578-3A
578-3B
578-3C
598-3 थिरूमलयमपालयम
7-2BIC
104
109-4A2
112-1A
112- IB 、
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(4)
0
01
25 0
00
20 0
03
64 0
01
49 0
00
15 0
03
83 0
10
83 0
16
85
राज्य: तमिलनाडु हेक्टेर
सेत्र आरे वर्ग मीटर (3)
(4)
(5) 0
00
44 0
00
72 0
01 .
41 0
09
96 0
01
34 0
00
90 0
00
60 0
00
19 0
00
77 0
00
84 0
00
30 0
00
08 0
11
37 0
01
52 0
03
28 0
00
92 0
02
31 [फा. सं . आर-31015/3/2001-ओ.आर-1 ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्रपद 8 , 1925
6015
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2003
S. O. 2470. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of motor sprit, superior kerosene oil and high speed diesel from Irimpanam Installation of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Irimpanam, Cochin in the State of Kerala to Karur in the State of Tamil Nadu a pipeline should be laid by Petronet CCK Limited;
And whereas for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the lands described in the Schedule annexed to thisnotification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
Any person interested in the land decribed in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri K. Vadivel, Competent Authority (Tamil Nadu), Cochin-Coimbatore- Karur Pipeline Project, 1* Floor, "KOVAI TOWERS " , No .: 44, Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore- 641018.
SCHEDULE
Taluk : Karur
District: Karur
State: Tamil Nadu
AREA
Name of the Village
Survey Nos .
Hect
Ares
Sq. Mts
(2)
(3)
(1)
(4)
(5)
03
779-5
0
AUTHUR
18.
00
77
0
779-6
0
779-7
00
89
0
00
32
779-9
0
00
1102-35
19:
0
1102-36
00
06
0
05
28
1106 -A1
75
0
00
1106-B5 PART II-SE . 3 ( ii )| THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 20X03 / BHADRAPADA 8 , 1925
6016
State : Tamil Nadu
District: Karur
Taluk : Aravakurichi
Survey Nos .
Name of the Village
(2)
(1)
740 - A MONJANUR ( WEST)
716 - A
738
739
672
686-2 THENNILAI ( EAST )
686-3
686-8
686-9
1384-1
429-2 THENNILAI (WEST )
432 - Al AREA
Sq. Mts Hect
(5)
Ares (4)
(3)
61
14
0
99
02
0
17
01
0
27
0
11
63
08
0
20
02
0
50
03
0
60
01
0
90
0
01
48
02
0
93
06
0
54
04
0
55
00
0
432- A2
633
25 -A4 PARAMATHI
179-3 PUNNAM
179-4
180-4
859 - A2
859 - A3
80
06
0
71
02
0
-
56
00
0
50
00
0
22
03
0
61
00
0
59
00
0
72
01
0
859 - A7
District : Erode Taluk : Kangayam
Name of the Village
SurveyNos .
(2)
(1)
686-2 KANGAYAM
830-3
920-3
488 VEERANAMPALAYAM
507-1
507-2
516-4
517-1 State : Tamil Nadu AREA
Ares
Sq. Mts Hect
(5)
(4)
(3)
00
90
0 .
82
01
0
00
05
0
16
02
0
11 0
01
92 0
00
70
03
0
52
07
0
:
6017
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्रपद 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
(1)
(2 )
280-7A VEERASOZHAPURAM
146-2 METTUPALAYAM (WEST)
1016-1
268-5 SAMBANDAMPALAYAM
(3 )
(5)
(4)
0
02
95
0
02
49
0
01
20
0
09
55
District: Coimbatore
Taluk : Tiruppur
Name of the Village
Survey Nos .
(2)
(1)
568-1 KANDIANKOIL
644-1
644-4 State : Tamil Nadu AREA
Hect
Ares
Sq. Mts (4)
(5)
(3)
0
07
81
02
04
0
01
0
01
06
01
0
699-1B
0
42
01
699 - IC
52-4 ALAGUMALAI
318-1 NORTH AVANASIPALAYAM
0
80
01
0
00
12
45
0
13
322- 3D
03
45
0
322-3H
State : Tamil Nadu
District : Coimbatore
Taluk : Palladam
Survey Nos .
Name of the Village
(2)
(1)
337 GANAPATHIPALAYAM
354-3
374
378-2
416-3 NARANAPURAM
AREA
Ares
Hect
Sq. Mts
(5) (3)
(4)
46
00
0
09
07
0
00
14 0
45 0
08
16 0
01
42
04
0
422-1B
434-1
434-2
04
01
0
42 0
02 6018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRAPADA 8 , 1925
(1)
(2) ODDARPALAYAM
3-2
4-2
75-1B PATTANAM
47-1C
47-2C
48-3
90-3C IRUGUR
511-1A
581 / 2B
584
586/4 Taluk : Coimbatore ( South)
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (3)
(4)
(5)
0
00
05
0
00
20
0
01
00
-
-
0
01
25
0
00
20
0
03
64
0
01
49
0
00
15
0
03
83
0
10
83
0
16
85
District : Coimbatore
Name of the Village
Survey Nos .
(1)
(2) SARCAR AGRAHARA VELLALUR
352-1C
554-3 SEERAPALAYAM
MALUMICHAM PATTI
547-3A
581-1A2A
581-1B1
600-1C1
600-1C2 MADHUKKARAI
255-1
578-3A
578-3B
578-3C
598-3
7-2B1C THIRUMALAYAM- PALAYAM
104
109-4A2
112-1A
112-1B State : TamilNadu AREA
Hect
Ares
Sq. Mts (3)
(4)
(5)
0
00
44
منى
-
0
00
72
0
01
41
0
09
96
0
01
34
0
00
90
0
00
60
0
00
19
0
00
77
0
00
84
0
00
30
0
00
08
-
0
11
37
0
01
52
0
03
28
0
00
92
0
02
31
[No. R-31015/3/2001 - O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्रपद 8 , 1925
6419
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2471.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज़ पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962(1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1612, तारीख 03 जून, 2003 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा मुन्द्रा - भटिण्डा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिण्डा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 17 जून 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उक्त भूमि अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वास प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनैं बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषगी) में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिलासिरसा
राज्य हरियाणा तहसीलसिरसा
गांव का नाम
हदबस्त नम्बर
खसरा नम्बर
क्षेत्रफल
कनाल मरला
भागूहिस्सा न (यदि कौई है)
2
3
4
Б
6 खाइशेरगढ़
222
3
45/12
0-1
126
2
0-3
129
2
0-3 जलालआना
110/18
1
251
01
146/23
2
2-6
188/9
2
3-2 312
देसुमलकाना
280
2
3-5
926
0-4
[फा. सं . आर-31015/ 13/2001- ओ.आर- ॥ ]
हरीश कुमार, अबर सचिव [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRAPADA 8, 1925
6020
New Delhi , the 28th August, 2003
S. O. 2471.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.1612 , dated the 3rd June 2003 , published in the Gazette of India, dated the 7th June 2003 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) ;
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 17th June 2003 ;
And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline:
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- seciton (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
State: Haryana
District :Sirsa
Tehsil: Sirsa
Hadbast
Extent Kanal -Maria
Khasra No.
No.
Name of village
Part/ Hissa No (ifany)
6
6
4
3
2
0-1
3
45/12
222
KhaiShergarh
0-3
2
126
0-3
2
129
0-1
1
110/18
251
Balalana
2-6
2
146/23
3-2
2
188/9
3-5
2
280
312
Desumalkana
0-4
926
[No. R-31015/13/2001 -O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
श्रममंत्रालय
1 "नई दिल्ली, 29 जुलाई, 2003
का०आ० 2472.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-07-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-29012/2/96- आईआर(विविध ) ]
6021
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
30-5-96 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
"Whether the action of the management of Haryana Minerals Ltd. , Faridabad, in the termination ofthe services of Shri Rajender Singh , Security Guard w.e.f. 18-3-1994 is just and legal ? If Not, what relief is the workman entitled to ?"
बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 29th July , 2003 S.O. 2472. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Haryana Minerals Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-07-2003 .
2. The workman has claimed that he was appointed by the Management on 16-6-89 at the post of Security Guard and his last drawn salary was Rs . 900/-P.M.; that his services were terminated on 18-3-94 without any rhyme and reason in gross violation of the provisions of the I.D. Act , 1947 and illegally ; that he approached the management several times for his reinstatement but lastly hewas flatly refused, he has prayed for his reinstatement in service with full back wages and continuity of service withregularity.
[No. L- 29012/2 /96 - IR(M) ]
B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT , NEW DELHI Presiding Officer: Shri B. N. Pandey
L.D. No. 58/96
Shri Rajender Singh S/ o Shri Phool Chand , R/ o Village Shahabad , P.O. Tigaon , Teh. & Distt . Faridabad (Haryana)
Claimant
Versus
M/sHaryana Minerals Limited ,
Arunachal Building , 19 , Barakhamba Road, 703-704, 7th Floor , New Delhi - 110001 .
Management
AWARD
The Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour vide its Order No. L - 29012/ 02/ 96 - IR (Vividh ) dated 2333 GI/2003-19
3. In its written statement the management has inter - alia alleged that the workman was engaged as semi skilled workman on 16-6-89 on a daily wage basit @Rs. 30.21 per day as prescribed by Central Government, that on 18-3-94 during the course of surprise check by flying squad and during inspection of the site and official records he was found involved in large scale pilferage at the site whereafter the then Manager of the Management Company personally lodged F.I.R. No. 25 of 1994 against the workman on 18-3-94 . Thereafter the workman flew from the site and did not report for duty pending enquiry in the matter; that on 7-12-94 the workman sent an application to the senior mining engineer of the management claiming seniority and inclusion of his name in the latest seniority list . Thereafter on 3-1-95 he sent an application stating that he has been working in the company since 16-6-89 but due to his illness he could not report for duty for the past six months and requested that he be allowed to join back on duty as he had recovered . The management has also filed photo copics of the applicaitons dated 7-12-94 and 3-1-95 ; that on 9-1-95 the management served a show cause notice on the workman that due to his unauthorised continuous absence for a long time it was thought that the workman isnot interested in continuing his service and he should show sufficient cause why disciplinary action be not taken against him; that on 10-1-95 the workman instead of replying the show cause notice sent a demand notice under Section 2A of the 1.D. Act to the respondent demanding, reinstatement with full back wages ; that despite service of the show cause notice the workman did not file any reply nor made any further representation , therefore , on 17-1-95 the management issued a termination ordet terminating services of the workman on the ground of 6022
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] continuous unauthorised absence from duty; that being aggrieved from the said termination order the workman raised industrial dispute; that on failure of the conciliation proceedings before the Conciliation Officer this reference has been made ; that there was no retrenchment of the workman in the instant case. Hence question of payment ofretenchment compensation or giving notice pay in view of provisions of Section 25 -F of the I.D. Act does not arise; that in fact the workman himself, without prior permission and sanction of leave by the competent authority absented himself from duty for continuous period of over six months from 19-3-94 and it was only on 3-1-95 that an application was sent by the workman to the respondent company stating that due to some illness the workman could not report for duty and that he should nowbe allowed to join back as he had recovered. It was further alleged that as per rules of the Punjab Civil Services Rules as applicable to the State of Haryana and H.M.L. State owned company , leave connot be claimed as ofright. It has to be sanctioned by the competent authority and it is open to the sanctioning authority to refuse or revoke leave due and applied for . Rest of the contents of the claimant's application have been denied and it has been stated that the claimant of the workman is liable to be dismissed.
4. The workman has filed rejoinder to the written statement of the management - opposite party. In the rejoinder he has denied and refuted contentions of the management and has reiterated his earlier versions.
5. In its evidence management filed affidavit (Ex . MW1 / 1 ) of Shri S. N. Sharma, Senior Mining Engineer who was also cross -examined on behalf of the workman and on the other hand the workman has filed his own affidavit (Ex . WW1 / 1 ) . He was also cross -examined by theManagement.
9. Continuous Working of the workman as Security Guard of the Management w.e.f. 16-6-89 to 18-3-94 is admitted by the Management respondent in its written statement. According to the management he was engaged on daily wage (Muster Roll) basis at the prescribed rate ofRs . 30.21p per day by the Central Government. The Management has also admitted in its written statement that the provisions of Haryana State Indüstrial Development Corporation Employees service bye- laws were applicable also to its employees and as such it was also applicable also in the case of workman. The Management has alleged that the services of the workman were terminated by its management due to unauthorised long absence ofthe workman after giving a show cause notice. It has also been alleged in the last of para 5 of its para wise reply in the written statement that rule 6.1 of Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Employees service Bye - laws provides that " no order of dismissal , removal or reduction shall be passed against a person to whom these bye - laws are applicable unless he has been given a reasonable opportunity of showing catuse against the action proposed to be taken in regard to him. " According to the respondent management , the workman was not retrenched from service but his services were terminated by the management due to unauthorised long absence . It has also been alleged that on 18-3-94 certain F.I.R. was lodged against the workman and few others , for committing theft and doing some illegal act but no copy of any such FIR of Police Station has been filed . Annexure ' A' filed by the management is only a photo copy of a written application for registration of F.I.R. genuineness of which has been denied by the workman. There is also apparent over writing on the figure of month in the application. Moreover , there is nothing in the evidence to show that any action by the police or the management itself in that regard was taken against theworkman . There is also no whisper even in the alleged termination order dated 17-1-95 about it , a copy of which isAnnexure ' E ' to the written statement .
6. The workman filed no document in evidence . Onthe other hand the management has filed photo copies ofcertain documents as Annexure ' A' to Annexure ' F ' to its written statement . The workman admitted genuineness of Annexure ' B ' ' D ' and ' F ' but genuineness ofthe rest of the documents were not admitted by him.
7. Both the parties have also filed their written arguments. However, none appeared for oral arguments on behalf of the management on the date fixed , therefore, I heard arguments of the A.R. of the workman exparte.
8. I have considered the submissions made by and on behalf of the parties and have also gone through the file.
9A. It is well settled that termination order in the ground of any kind of alleged misconduct cannot be treated as a retrenchment simpliciter . Long unauthorised absence from duty comes within the perview of misconduct and termination order passed on the ground of continuous unauthorised absence from duty for a long period is nothing but renal action and punishment and such punishment order cannot legally be sustained in absence of proper disciplinary enquiry . No doubt , if a workman deliberately neglects to carry out his work or perform his duty when required to do so with reasonable carehas tobe held guilty of misconduct or negligence. In the instant case it is allegedby the Management that the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राज़पत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
6023
sustained and it is liable to be quashed . It is accordingly quashed.
workman acted wilfully assisted, participated or co- operated in commission of alleged theft for which alleged FIR is said to have been lodged. But such alleged misconduct must be proved after holding a legal and proper departmental enquiry and proper and full opportunity was to be given to the workman to prove his innocence . In absence of any such departmental disciplinary enquiry no employee/ workman can be terminated by way of punishment. Even in case of a temporary employee or casual labour who has completed more than 240 working days and proper enquiry is must and he cannot be terminated from services by way of punishment summarily.
11. On an order of termination being set aside, the normal rule is reinstatement with full back wages . Though there is discretion to refuse reinstatement or full back wages for special and justifiable reasons . However , he demands that the normal rule be departed from , must plead, set forth and prove the special circumstances justifying the departure from the normal rule . A workman whose services have been illegally terminated either by dismissal , discharge or retrenchment, will be entitled to full back wages except to the extent he was gainfully employed during the enforced idleness . The management has adduced no evidence at all to prove that the workman was in some gainful employment after his termination on the other hand the workman has also not adduced any evidence to show that he was earning nothing or doing no work for gain after his termination . Therefore , I feel it just and proper to order his reinstatement with 50% of hisbackwages from the date of his terminated till he is reinstated in service . He deserves to be paid and reinstate in service by the Management within 30 days after publication of the award in the official gazette failing which the management shall also be liable to pay interest at the rate of 10% per annum . Award is given accordingly . Dated: 23-7-03.
B. N. PANDEY, Presiding Officer . नई दिल्ली, 1 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ० 2473.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैग्नीज और इण्डिया लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 60/87 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-07-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं ० एल-27012/47/ 85- D-(III )B- आईआर ( विविध ) ] बी०एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 1st August , 2003
S.O. 2473. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 60/87) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Manganese Ore India Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 30-07-03.
[No. L- 27012 /47 /85 - D ( III) B - IR( M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
10. In the instant case admittedly no action against the workman was taken by police on the basis of the alleged letter dated 18-3-94 for lodging FIR . No prosecution was launched against the workman . Even in the alleged show cause notice dated 9-1-95 there was no allegation against the workman regarding his alleged criminal act of theft . The alleged show cause notice was issued on 9-1-95 on the ground of his unauthorised continuous absence since 19-3-94 . But the management itself has filed a photo copy of an application dated 7-12-94 i.e. of just before a month of the alleged show cause notice which was given by the workman to the Managing Director of the Management requesting to enlist his name in seniority list . The management has also filed a copy of application dated 3-1-95 given by the workman to theManaging Director alleging that due his illness he could not attend his duty ; that he had also given an application with medical certificate to Manager Mr. Khan requesting to permit him to join the duty but he was not permitted. He also requested the Managing Director in the same application dated 3-1-95 to allow him tojoin his duty. Therefore, it cannot be said that he remained absent without any information for any reasonable excuse. There isanother application annexure ' D ' dated 10-1-95 given by the workman to the Managing Director of the Management praying to reinstate him in service with full back wages and continue in service although no final order was passed till then and according to management the alleged show cause notice was given just one day before i.c. 9-1-95 . It shows that his request , application and representations were not considered by the management and ultimately the management passed the impugned order of termination on 17-1-95 only in hurry without any enquirywhich was just after 7 days from the date of giving show cause notice . It also show that he was not afforded proper and sufficient time to explain and show cause and the management acted arbitrarily, illegally and hurridly in passing the impugned order without holding any enquiry whatsoever . Therefore , I am of the view that the impugned order of termination cannot be legally [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6024
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
CASE NO. CGIT/LC/R/ 60/87
3.Applicant denied all the charges and submitted that he his interested in Union activities . Therefore he was falsely implicated by the management . Sentence passedby the management against him is also very severe. Applicant workman payed that he should be reinstated in service with full back wages and the order of dismissal be declared as void .
PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI R. K. DUBEY
Shri Sevak Ram , Through Working President, Bhartiya Manganese Mazdoor Sangh
Ward No. 14,
Applicant
Distt . Balaghat.
4. Non -applicant submitted that applicant takes active part on the day of incident . He enticed the mob. Therefore after proper Departmental Enquiry , he was dismissed from service . This tribunal on 10th Jan 1996 holds that the enquiry conducted against the workman isjust, proper and legal . Preliminary Issue No. 1 , 2 & 3 is decided in favour of the Non - applicant , Management.
versus
Maganese Ore India Limited,
5. At present, Issue No. 4 remains to be decided which is whether the termination/action taken against the workman is justified on the facts of the case ?
Non-applicant
The chairman cum Managing Director, 3, Mount Road Extension, Nagpur , Maharashtra
AWARD
Passed on this 21st day of July - 2003
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L -27012/47/85 -D.III (B ) dated 1-5-87 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal .
6. Inthis respect, I peruse the DE papers , considered the documents and arguments of both the parties . It is not disputed that on the date of incident, 3 persons died due topolice firing on Bharveli Mines . DE papers , statements of witnesses are also clear on this point that applicant abetted and enticed the mob to attack upon the management and company property. Thus it is clear that theapplicant takes active part in the violent demonstration againstthe management .
"Whether the action of the management of Bharveli Manganese Mine ofManganese Ore India Limited, Nagpur is justified in dismissing Shri Sewakram w.e.f. 7-12-84 ? If not what relief the workman is entitled?"
7. It was argued on behalf of the applicant that he alongwith other workers acquitted by the Sessions Court . Certified copy of the judgement of Ist ASJ Shri B. К. Srivastava is also filed in this case . But the civil law and criminal law are very much different. In criminal law, the guilt ofthe accused must be proved beyond all reasonable doubts but civil law is only on the basis of probabilities . Conclusions of the civil court including service tribunals rests on the probabilities . Therefore the acquittal of the applicant workman by the Sessions Court has no effect in departmental proceedings or in the proceedings under I.D. Act.
8, As I already pointed out it is proved that applicant takes active participation in the violent demonstration against the management . Therefore his dismissal from 'service after holding enquiry is proper and fullyjustified. Dismissal is the proper punishment for such type of workman who participates in violent demonstrations or violent activities against the management . Therefore I hold that the dismissal order by the management of Bharveli Manganese Mines resulting in dismissing applicant Sevak Ram is proper . Hence the statement of claim filedby the applicant is rejected . Both parties should 2. The brief facts of this case are that Shri Kankar Manjare formed Krantikari Mazdoor Sangh at Bharveli Mines. This organisation is not yet organised . A meeting was organised on behalf of this organisation by Shri Kankar Munjare and Kishanlal . Kishanlal was chargesheetedby the Bharveli Mines Management . When the Enquiry Officer on 27-6-82 tried to conduct enquiry, he was opposed by the applicant with several persons . Several labours including some women labourers surrounded the Mines Manager and other officials and gheraoed them . The SM and police also reaches the spot . Labourers misbehaved with the Mines Administration . Situation becomes violent . Administration warns anorders the public to leave the place and after that police fired upon the mob . 3 persons died in the incident due to police firing . Applicant was chargesheeted . He was found guilty and later applicant was dismissed from service.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8,. 1925
bear their costs throughout. Advocate fees is Rs . 1000/- ifcertified.
9. The reference of the Ministry is answered as the action of the management ofBharveli Manganese Mines ofMOIL is justified in dismissing Shri Sevak Ram w.e.f. 7-12-84.
R. K. DUBEY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ० 2474.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार, एन. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./ एल.सी./ आर. /58/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-22012/304/91 - आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ]
एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th August, 2003 S.O. 2474.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 58 / 92 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of NCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 1-8-2003 .
[No. L- 22012/304/91 -IR (C- II ) ]
N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
CASE NO . CGIT/LC/R/58/92
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R.K. DUBEY Shri Budhiram Vishwakarma
Through Secretary ,
Villa Charonil Kalan ,
MP Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Panchayat PostBedhan,
Distt. Sidhi .
Applicant
Versus
The General Manager , Jayant Project of NCL,
PO Jayant Colliery, Distt. Sidhi (MP)
Non -applicant
AWARD
Passed on this 21st day of July, 2003 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide orderNo. L -22012/304/91 - IR C.II dated 21-3-92 as referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the The General Manager, Jayant Project of NCL , PO Jayant Colliery, Distt . Sidhi ( MP ) in dismissing Shri Budhiram Vishwakarma, Turner from company services waf 6-10-87 is legal and justified? If not what relictis the workman entitled to?"
2. The brief facts ofthe case acase are that the applic Shri Budhiram Vishwakarma, worked under the non- applicant as turner, workshop , Jayant Project . on6-3-37, atabout 5AM, Security Officer Nakul Rajwar checked 2 pupil and found that both of them carried the different items of the company. One of them was, the present applicant Shri Budhiram Vishwakarma. Both of the persons who catch red handed were handed over to the local police. Chargeheet was issued against the workman Budhiram . He found guilty and by the order of the competent authority, he was dismissed from the service.
3. It was submitted by the applicant workman that he made several complaints against the Security Officer Nakul Rajwar . Therefore Security Officer falsely implicatedhim in the alleged theft case. Applicant denies whole of the allegations and charges and pleadings of the applicants and prayed that his dismissal order be declared as null and void and applicant be put back into the service with back wages .
:
4.Non-applicant submitted that the applicant caught red handed with stolen property therefore his dismissal from service is proper.
5. On 5-3-2001 , this tribunal holds that the Departmental Enquiry conducted against the workman is properandjustified. Therefore at present the only question remains to be decided is that whether the order of the General Manager , Jayant Project resulting in dismissing applicant is proper or not ? As I already pointed out this tribunal at present has only to consider the extent of sentence . I peruse the departmental enquiry papers evidence lead by both the parties and all the other relevant documents. It seems that the JMFC Baiden convicted the applicant Budhiram Viswakarma under Sec . 379 of PC bout applicant acquitted in appeal by the Sessions Court. I also peruse the Judgement of the appellate Court.
6026
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
6. Industrial Disputes comes under the purview of civil Law. Civil Law is different from criminal law. In criminal law, the guilt must be proved beyond all reasonable doubts but this is not necessary in civil cases. In civil law , case is decided in considering the probabilities . It is not necessary that every point be proved beyond all reasonable doubt . It is also essential to point out the decisions of the criminal court are not binding over the civil court or disciplinary authority . The proceedings and order of the departmental enquiry are different from the proceedings and judgements of the criminal cases . With these observations , I peruse the present case.
[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 179/99) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं ० एल-40012/55/99.- आईआर(डीयू) ]
बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 5th August, 2003
1 S.O. 2475.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 179/99 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Labour Court, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Director Postal (Accounts) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 5-8-2003 .
[No. L -40012/ 55/99 - IR(DU) ]
B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT NEW DELHI
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI B. N. PANDEY
I.D. No .. 179/99
Shri Ashok Kumar
7. It is clear from the evidence led by the management that the applicant was found or caught red- handed with stolen property. It was not in the pleadings of the applicant that he owned such property and if he owned such property then it is not necessary for him to carry such property at 5 AM in the morning near the company mines. Applicant pleaded before the tribunal that he made several complaints against the Security Officer but this fact is not pleaded before the Enquiry Officer. Any suggestion of this fact is also not made by the applicant to the Security Officer at the time of his statement . Clearly this fact is after- thought of applicant and this fact is prepared to justify the defence of the applicant . It is clear from the evidence that the applicant was caught red - handed when any workman cought red- handed with official stolen property then the sentence of dismissal is proper. In my view, dismissal order passed by the company authorities against the workman is fully justified and proper in view of the offence committed by theapplicant.
8. Therefore that the above mentioned observations , I found that the action taken by the company against the workman is justified and proper . Therefore the statement of claim made by the applicant is rejected. In view of the facts of this case , both parties should bear their costs throughout including Rs . 1000/- as Advocate fees if certified.
9. The Labour Ministry's reference is answered that the action taken by the General Manager , Jayant Project of NCL, Jayant Colliery in dismissing Shri Budhiram Viswakarma from company services is legal and justified.
R. K. DUBEY , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ ० 2475.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डायरेक्टर पोस्टल ( एकाउन्ट्स) के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय C/o Shri D.C. Jatrana, Secretary General , All India Postal Accounts Assn . , Bijwasan , New Delhi .
...Workman
Versus
The Director of Accounts (Postal ) Old Secretariat, Delhi- 110054.
AWARD
The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 40012/ 55 /99-1.R. ( DU) dated 30-7-99 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :--
"Whether the action of the management of Director Postal (Accounts) in terminating the services of Shri Ashok Kumar, Casual Labour , is legal and justified? If Not, to what relief is the workman is entitled ?"
2. Reference was received in 22-11-99 . It was registered and notice to parties was issued for 1-2-2000.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
On1-2-2000 claim was filed and for W.S. it was adjourned to 10-4-2000. On 10-4-2000 W.S. filed and for rejoinder adjourned to 4-7-2000 , On 4-7-2000 rejoinder not filed it was adjourned to 29-8-2000 . On 29-8-2000 rejoinderwas filedand case was adjourned to 7-11-2000 for filing parties documents . On 7-11-2000 case was adjourned to 19-12-2000 for filing of W/documents . On 19-12-2000 and again on 13-2-2001 case was adjourned for filing of W/documents , on 10-4-2001 . On 10-4-2001 it was adjourned to 12-6-2001 for filing of M/ Affidavit. On 12-6-2001 for filing of management affidavit case was adjourned to 23-8-2001. On 23-8-2001 one affidavit filed by the management and for cross it was adjourned to 22-1-2002 . On 22-1-2002 it was adjourned to 18-3-2002 for cross -examination of management witness . On 18-3- 2002 for further orders case was adjourned to 1-7-2002. On 1-7-02 and again on 5-7-02 as P.O. was on official tour case was adjourned to 26-11-02 for cross -examination of management witness . On 26-11-2002 due to holding of Lok Adalat case was adjourned to 25-2-2003 for cross of management witness . On 25-2-2003 case was adjourned to6-5-2003 for cross of management witness . On 6-5-03 asthe Ld. Presiding Officer was on leave so the case was adjourned to 30-7-03 for cross - examination of management witness . Today none is present for the workman. It transpires from the order sheet that the workman is not coming for the last several dates. He has also failed to adduce his evidence so for despite repeated opportunity. It appears that he is not interested in prosecuting the case . Hence the case is closed for want of evidence and non -prosecution. No Dispute Award is passed accordingly.
Dated: 30-7-03
B. N. PANDEY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त , 2003
का० आ० 2476.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 112/89 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं ० एल-40012/44/88-डी-2 ( बी]
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 5th August , 2003 S.O. 2476. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central
6027 Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 112/89) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Postal Deptt. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 5-8-2003.
[No. L-40012/44/88-D -2 (B)] B.M. DAVID, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT NEW DELHI Presiding Officer : Shri B. N. Pandey
L.D. No. 112/89
Shri Balbir Singh S/ o Shri Bhim Singh , Safai Karamchari, c/o Delhi Labour Union, Aggarwal Bhawan, G. T. Road, Tis Hazari , Delhi - 110054.
Workman
Versus
TheManagement of M/ s Posts and Telegraph Department through the Superintendent , NorthDivision, Civil Line , Delhi . Management
AWARD
The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-40012/44/88 -D . 2 (B) dated 23-10-89 has referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Balbir Singh Daily Wager Safai Karamchari w.e.f: 13-1-87 by the Sr. Superintendent of Post Office , North Division , Civil Lines , Delhi is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the workman is entitled?"
2. In brief the case of the workman Shri Balbir Singh is that he was taken into the employment as Safai Karamchari on daily rate basis w.e.f. 15-5-85 and was posted at Ashok Vihar Post Office. He was sponsored by the Employment Exchange ; that he worked from 15-5-85 to 3--11-85 when he was transferred on 4-11-85 to Civil Lines Post Office where he worked till 13-1-97. That he was being treated as a daily wager/casual/ muster roll worker and was being paid wages as fixed and revised from time to time under the Minimum Wages 6028
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
statement and reiterating his earlier versions . The workman filed four documents and his own affidavit in evidence to establish his claim . He was also cross- examined by the other side . On the other hand the management filed affidavit of Shri C.L. Prabhakar Superintendent of Post Offices, Delhi . He was cross- examined by the workman side . They, both the parties, also filed their written arguments.
5. The case was earlier decided on 7-2-97 by Shri Ganpati Sharma, the then Presiding Officer of this Court wherein it was found that the respondent - management was not an ' Industry' within meaning of the I.D. Act . Therefore, theworkman could not get the relief claimed. His case could not be decided on merits , hence feeling aggrieved he preferred a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi . The Writ petition was allowed and the order dated 7-2-97 was set aside . Matter was remanded back to this Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute afresh on merits .
6. 1 have heard learned counsel for both the parties, considered their submissions and perused the file .
Act while his counter parts who were doing identical work who were treated as a regular employees were paid their salary in the pay scale of Rs . 196-232 with usual allowances admissible under the rules . They were also allowed to enjoy other benefits leave and holidays etc. which were completely denied to the workman . That the services of the workman were terminated w.e.f. 13-1-87 without assigning any valid reason which was wholly illegal , bad and just and mala fide . That the job against which workman was working is of a regular and permanent nature ; that after completing 240 days continuous employment the workman acquired status of a permanent employee ; that the termination order of the workman was discriminatory because juniors to him were retained in service that no charge sheet , no disciplinary action was initiated or contemplated against the workman; that no notice , no notice pay, no compensation was paid or offered to him before or at the time of termination. That the impugned termination order is violative of Section 25 - F , G and H of the I.D. Act , 1947. That the workman is unemployed since the date of his termination, thatthe terinination order is wholly illegal and unjustified and the workman is entitled to be reinstated in service with continuity and full wages and all consequential benefits ; that the conciliation proceedings failed before the A.L.C./Conciliation Officer Central . Hence this reference . That the workman is also entitled to costs of these procceding.
3. The claim of the workman has been contested by theManagement- respondent by way of filing a written statement wherein it has been alleged that the workman Balbir Singh was engaged w.e.f. 16-5-85 to 2-11-85 against Icave arrangement. That he was engaged as daily wages Safaiwala as a paid substitute w.e.f. 16-5-85 . He was rendered surplus w.e.f. 13-1-87 being junior most daily wager safaiwala. Therefore , consequently his termination was done as a compulsion during service . He was given all the facilities admissible to a daily wages Safaiwala Karamchari ; that he was engaged as a paid substitute only against absentee of the regular safaiwalas ; that mere completion of 240 days employment does not give status of permanent employee automatically; that no article of constitution was violated; that his services were terminated only on account of his being rendered surplus; that he was junior most daily wager Safaiwala and no compensation was paid to a daily wages staff in case he being surplus ; that no violation of any rule was done , that the workman was offered service of paid substitute as and when there in Icave vacancy arise but the workman refused, that the claim of the workman deserves to be rejected.
7. Admittedly the workman was engaged as daily wager in its employment by the Management w.e.f. 16- 5-85 till 13-1-87. It is also not denied by the Management that no notice or notice pay or any amount of compensation was given to him before or at the time of his termination on 13-1-87. There is no dispute that he completed his services as a daily wager for more than 240 days which made him entitled to get rights and protections of the provisions of Section 25 - F of the I. D. Act, 1947. The management's witness MW1 has deposed in his affidavit that the workman was engaged as daily wager and his services were utilized as daily wager against absentee /leave/deputationetc. , that his services were terminated w.e.f. 13-1-87 as there was no absentee at that time and he was rendered surplus being junior most daily wager safaiwala . The workman has stated in . his cross- examination that he was orally told not to come and no written letter was given to him. Thus the alleged termination of the workman amounted to retrenchment which could have been done only after following the mandatory provisions of Section 25 - F of the 1. D. Act, but admittedly those provisions were not followed by the management , therefore , the retrenchment of the workman without giving him prior notice or payment of any amount in lieu of such notice towards wages for the period of the notice cannot be legally sustained and it is liable to be quashed. After quashing the retrenchment/termination order of the workman 1 find that the workman is entitled to reinstatement in his service as earlier .
4. The workman also filed his rejoinder to the reply of the management denying contentions of the written
8. Now after reinstatement of the workman in service question of payment of his back wages arises . In 6029
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government оп 5-8-2003.
[No. L- 13011 /2/98 - IR(DU) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT 117/9 HOTEL KISHOREE BUILDING SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 171 OF 98 this regard I find that the management witness Shri C.L. Prabhakar MW1 has deposed in his affidavit that during the conciliation proceedings before the Assistant Labour Commissioner , New Delhi on 1-4-88 , the department agreed to engage him, (the workman ) for 40 days against leave arrangement and he was also offered that he would be engaged if such arrangement occurs but he refused to accept the same and asked that he would accept the demand ifhe is engaged regularly in future . The workman has also admitted in his cross -examination that he was told before the A.L. C. to resume duty for 20 days but he was told that his services would be dispensed with thereafter. In the written statement it was alleged that the workman was engaged against leave arrangement on daily wages basis . On 13-1-87 he was removed because he became surplus. However, he was offered to work as paid substitute as daily wage safaiwala against leave arrangement but he refused to accept the offer . Section 25E of the I. D. Act , 1947 provides that:
Inthe matter of dispute between-
"No compensation shall be paid to a workman who has been laid off-
General Secretary UP Chawni Board Sikshak Karamchari Sangh C/o Ravi Pratap Narain Singh, 119/525 Darshan Purwa Kanpur.
AND
Executive Officer , Cantonment Board Babina, District Jhansi .
AWARD
(i ) if he refuses to accept any alternative employment in the same establishment from which he has been laid off or in any other establishment belonging to the same employment and such alternative employment does not call for any special skill or previous experience and can be done by the workman . " So it cannot be termed as forced unemployment or idleness from work in the case of present workman .
1. Central Government, Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi , vide its notification No. L- 13011 /2/98/IR (DU) dated 7-9-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .
In this view of the fact I am of the view that the workman is not entitled to get any back wages after his reinstatement . However, he deserved to be reinstated in the service by the Management within 30 days after publication of this award in gazette. The award is given accordingly.
Dated: 31-7-2003
Whether the action of the management of Cantonment Board Babina is legal and justified in not giving promotion to Sri Ganesh Prasad as Tax Collector? If so to what relief the workman is entitled?
B. N. PANDEY, Presiding Officer दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2003
नई का०आ० 2477. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कैन्टोन्मेन्ट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
2. It is unnecessary to give full facts of the case as whenthe case was taken up for hearing on 14-7-03 , the workman moved application praying that he is not interested in prosecuting the present dispute as he has sought retirement voluntarily from the service of the management and that the case be closed.
अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 171/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -13011 / 2/98- आईआर (डीयू) ] बी० एम ० डेविड , अवर सचिव
3. In view of above facts and circumstances of the case the tribunal is left with no other option but to dedide the reference in negative holding that the workman is not entitled to any relief pursuant to the present reference order.
New Delhi , the 5th August, 2003
4. Reference is accordingly answered against the workman.
SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding.Officer S.O. 2477. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 171/98)
2333GI/2003-20 6030
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2003
का० आ० 2478.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्डनैन्स फैक्ट्रीके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर/ 100/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं० एल- 14011/2/93- आईआर ( डीयू) ]
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 5th August , 2003
S. O. 2478. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 100/ 94 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Ordnance Factory and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 5-8-2003 .
[No. L- 14011 /2 /93 - IR(DU) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM -LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
CASE NO . CGIT/LC/ R/100/94
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI R. K. DUBEY, The General Secretary, Ordnance Factory, Khamaria Kamgar Union, 158-Subhash Nagar, Post Khamaria, Jabalpur.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 1. श्री एस० चक्रवर्ती
2. श्री एच० पी० परोहा
3 . श्री टी० के ० हाजरा
4. श्री कमलकान्त गुप्ता
5. श्री बी० बी० प्रधान
6. श्री एच० पी० रजक
7. श्री दीपसिंह प्ररावी
8. श्री जब्बर खान
9. श्री ए० एम० सिन्हा
10. श्री एम० कृष्णन
11 . श्री श्यामलाल यादव
12. श्री किशनलाल सोनी
13. श्री नाशिर अहमद
14. श्री गुलाबसिंह राजपूत
श्री राम सिपाही 15.
16. श्री फैज मोहम्मद
17. श्री ए ० के० तिवारी
18. श्री एस० विश्वास
19. श्री ए० के ० यादव
20. श्री शंकर लाल
21. श्री बी० एल० कटारिया
22. श्री नाथूलाल
23. श्री हरिशंकर पटेल
...
Applicant
Versus
...Non-applicant
The General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Khamaria, Jabalpur.
AWARD
Passed on this 23rd day of July, 2003 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide order No. L - 14011 / 2/ 93 - IR(DU) dated 13-7-94 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:
" क्या प्रबंधतंत्र आर्डनेंस फैक्ट्री, जबलपुर ( म ० प्र ० ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा निम्नलिखित कर्मकारों की तृतीय वेतन आयोग के अनुसार एक्सपर्ट क्लासीफिकेशन कमेटी के द्वारा सिफारिशें किये गये संशोधित वेतनमानों को दिनांक 15-10-81 के स्थान पर 1-1-73 से प्रभावी न किये जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायोचित है । यदि नहीं तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष के हकदार हैं । "
2. The brief facts of the statement of claim filed by the workman are that the applicant workman are permanent employees of non - applicant at Jabalpur and holding posts of turner, machinist , general fitter etc. After the recommendations made by the 3rd Pay Commission in respect of revised pay scale from 1-1-1973 an expert classification committee was set up to study and evaluate the job context of all the industrial and few specifically non - industrial jobs in defence establishments . ECC recommended the revised scales for the existing grade of Mill Wright, General fitter A, B , C, Tool setter and Turner Grade A, B, C Machinist and Grinder special A, B, C. Management accepted the pay scales proposed by the ECC and gave effect to them only from 16-10-81 instead of from the date of 1-1-73 , when the recommendations ofthe 3rd Pay Commission was to be brought into effect . It was submitted by the applicants that other staff belonging to the same management i.e. supervisor A Tech. Sr. Planner, Sr. Rate Fixer, Sr. Estimate etc. whose scale was also revised and enhanced by the ECC . Their pay fixed notionally from 1-1-73 . Applicants applied for the refixation of their pay scales but their prayer is not accepted. It was also submitted by the applicants that if any official is given the benefits of newpayscalefrom the date appointed them the pay scales of other officials considered by the same committee also brought into effect from the same date . Due to the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
6031
April 7,1997 held that the benefit ofthe CAT decision should alsobe given to the applicants of the writ before Supreme Court.
management's action applicants were discriminated and they were not treated equally along with other officials . Management remained adment and irresponsive for denial of the reasonable and rightful rights of the applicants on the basis of equality. Applicants prayed that at revised pay granted by the order of the ECC be granted to them on 1-1-73 instead from 16-10-81 .
7.After considering all the documents and arguments, I do not see any reason for the non-grant of benefits to thatapplicants . One category of the employees received benefitsmuch earlier in comparison to the applicants . Then this is the clear case of discrimination. In my view, the applicants are fully justified to claim their revised pay scales from 1-1-73 instead of 16-10-81 on the same conditions which were the conditions of the officials previously benefited . Order No. 563 of Indian Ordnance and Equipments Factories , OFK, Khamaria dated 23-9-89 and orders No. 7-3-89 are helpful in this respect.
8. Therefore the statement of claim of the workman applicant accepted and it is ordered that the benefits ofthe recommendation of the ECC granted after 3rd pay commission also granted to the applicants from the date of 1-1-73 .
9.Applicants concerned will not be eligible for the payment of arrears of pay and allowances from 1-1-73 to 20-6-1980. All the conditions of the order No. 563 dated 23-9-89 of OFK Khamaria treated as guidelines for the fixation of pay scales and determination of arrears ofthe pay of applicants . Non-applicant also bear the cost of applicant before the tribunal including Advocate fees which is fixed as Rs . 15000/ ifcertified.
3.Non-applicants in their reply admitted that after the recommendations ofthe 3rd pay commission, ECC was formed . It was submitted by the management that the main reasonbehind the formation of ECC is to remove the anoma- lies and amiguities in the recommendations of the 3rd pay commission. On acceptance of the recommendations of the ECC, the pay scales revised were awarded to the appli- cants uniformly w.e.f 16-10-81 . It was also admitted by the non -applicant that some of the officials whose pay is re- vised by the ECC were given the benefits of revised pay scales from 1-1-73 . It was submitted by the Non -applicant that the higher scale granted to the higher scale categories bythe order of the Jabalpur bench of Central Administra- tive tribunal in the case ofD.N. Singh and others, based on compromise formula mutually agreed by both the parties. The management accepted the pay scales recommended by the ECC under similar circumstances. Pay scales ofstaff Supervisor A, Sr. Planner, Sr. Rate Fixer, Sr. Estimator etc. belonging to the Khamaria management were also revised from 1-1-73 . Applicant's case is not similar and they were not highly skilled workers . It was also submitted by the Non-applicant that this application made by only some workers of the OFK, Khamaria but the question concerns with whole of the defence establishment of the ordnance Factories in India. It was prayed by the Non-applicant that the statement of claim be rejected.
10. The question of the Labour Ministry is answered that the action of the management or Ordance Factory, Jabalpur in not granting the revised pay scales recommended by the ECC on the based of 3rd pay commission from the date 1-1-73 is not justified and all the workman entitled the benefits of the ECC from 1-1473 instead of 15-10-81 .
4. The main point for determination in this case is whether the applicants were entitled to the fixation oftheir newpay scales from 1-1-73 instead of 16-10-81 .
R.K. DUDEY, Presiding Officer.
नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2003
का० आ० 2479. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हाई एक्सप्लोसिव फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , पुणे के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । 5. It is clear from the admission of the non-applicant management that after the recommendations of the 3rd pay commission to clear and remove the anomalies and ambiguities and expert classification committee or ECCwere formed. ECC tries to remove the ambiguities and anomolies. It is also clear that due to compromise before that CAT, Jabalpur, some of the officers were granted the benefits of ones pay scale from 1-1-73 instead of 16-10-81 . Although it was argued onbehalf of the management that the ECC has no right to recommend any date and it is also true, that the pay scales adopted w.e.f 16-10-81 by the order of the President of India after the recommendations of the ECC.
[ सं ० एल- 14012/61 /2001- आई आर (डीयू) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 5th August , 2003
S. O. 2479. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal Pune as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management High explosive Factory and their workman , 6.When some categories of officials mentioned by the ECC went before the CAT, Jabalpur and due to compromisebefore the CAT, they received benefits ofthe new pay scale from 1-1-73 , then the same benefits should be granted to all the officials who comes under the purview ofECC. Honorable Supreme Court in M.L. Sharma versus Union of India, and others in SLP ( C) No. 9350 of 1996 , on [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 6032
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
New Delhi , the 6th August, 2003 which was received by the Central Government on 5-8-2003 .
[No. L- 14012/61 /2001 - IR(DU) ] B.M. DAVID, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI . J.L DESHPANDE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT PUNE
S. O. 2480.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 14/96) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Telocom Deptt. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-8-2003.
Reference (IT) No. 5/2002
[No. L-40012/260/94 -IR(DU) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
Between High Implosive Factory, Khadki , Pune.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2) AT DHANBAD.
FirstParty
PRESENT : SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer .
Inthe matter ofan Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) the of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
And Shri , Raffiq Sayyed, 1309 , Bhawani Peth, Pune-411002.
Reference No. 14 of 1996
SecondParty
In the matter of: Termination/ Compulsory Retirement .
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Chief GeneralManager, Telecom Bihar Telecom Circle and their workman
Coram: SHRI. J.L. DESHPANDE, Industrial Tribunal, Pune .
Appearances
Appearances : Shri , Kalbhor, Advocate for the First Party.
Shri R.C. Sinha Advocate .
Onbehalfofthe workman :
Shri . Satpute , Advocate for the Second
Party
D.K. Verma Advocate.
Onbehalfof the Employers :
AWARD
Jharkhand
State
: Post
Industry
Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th July, 2003,
AWARD
This is a reference for Awarded by the Desk Officer Commissioner under clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
2. The Second Party Union has not filed statement of claim . The demands are thus , not substantiated. Hence , the reference is disposed off demands being not substantiated .
TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act. 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-40012/260/ 94/I.Rdated 26-2-96:
3.Award accordingly.
SCHEDULE
Pune .
J.L. DESH PANDE, Industrial Tribunal
Dated: 5th July, 2003 .
नई दिल्ली, 6 अगस्त, 2003
"Whether the action of the management of the ChiefGeneral Manager Telecom, Bihar Telecom Circle interminating the services of Shri Bijendra Kumar Das is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?
का० आ ० 2480.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम; 1947
2.The case ofthe concerned workman according to written statement submitted by him in brief is as follows:-
(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं ० 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/ 96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं ० एल- 40012/ 260/94- आई आर ( डीयू) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
The concerned workman submitted that he was appointed as Motor Pump Operator at 38 Harding Road , Patna at a salary of Rs. 1500/ -P.M . from 2-12-92 by the ChiefGeneral Manager of the management vide letter dt . 1-12-92.He submitted that he was in service as Motor pump- men from 2-12-92 to 15-3-94 . On 16-3-94 management terminated his service vide order No. B & A Ruling/ Cojnt/ 94/12 dt . 16-3-94 without assigning any reason though he 6033
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
worked continuously for more than 240 days in a year during the period of his service arbitrarily, illegally and violating the principle of natural justice . He alleged that after his termination from service management engaged another workman for the said post and at present he is working as motor pumpman . Accordingly he raised industrial dispute before the ALC( C) Patna for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication .
3. Points for decision in this reference are :-
"whether the action of the management of the ChiefGeneral Manager, Telecom, Bihar Telecom Circle in terminating the services of Shri Bijendra Kumar Das is justified and legal ? If not , to what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?"
FINDING WITH REASONS
4. It transpires from the record that neither the management submitted any W.S. - Cum - rejoinder nor they appeared while the case was taken up for final hearing. Accordingly the case was taken up for ex parte hearing. Concerned workman in order to substantiate his claim examined himself as witness . From his evidence it transpires that he got his appointment as motor pump operator on 2-12-92 . On the basis of appointment letter issued by the management . He disclosed that the management without giving any notice and also without assigning any reason terminated him from his service illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice. As per his claim heworked from 2-12-92 to 15-3-94 continuously and more than 240 days in a year. He also disclosed that the job which he performed was permanent in nature and accordingly, there was no justification to terminate him from his service particularly when there was no specific reason behind the same . He further disclosed that after termination the management engaged another workman.in his place who is now performing his duties as motor pumpman. The concerned workman during his evidence relied on the appointment letter marked as Ext. W- 1 on the basis ofwhich he was engaged as motor pumpman .
appointment he discharged his duties continuously till the date of his termination from service. It speaks clearly that heworked continuously for more than 240 days in a year. The reason for termination of the service of the concerned workman was about ban on engagement of any casual worker . The management inspite ofgetting scope has failed to produce any order to show from which period the said order for banning on engagement of casual worker, came into effect. The specific allegation of the workman is that after his termination management engaged another workman who is operating the pump house . Nature ofjob tooperate pump machine in a pump house definitely is to be considered as permanent in nature . It is seen that the chiefG.M. Telecom patna requested for providing another pump operator (Ext. W/3 ) for smooth running ofthe pump house.Operator of pump machine in a pumphouse requires skill and experience and as such there is reason to believe that such work could not be done by a casual worker . The appointment letter marked as Ext . W/5 does not expose anything to show that the concerned workman was engaged as casual worker. On the contrary it speaks clearly that he was engaged as operator on contract basis. In every contract theremust be an agreement and it should be for a specificperiod. No paper on the part of the management is forthcoming to show that on the basis of any agreement the concerned workman was engaged as pump operator. As no time limit of the contract was mentioned in the order there is scope to say that the management taking the helplessness of the poor workman used the term contract onthe letter of appointment so that they can terminate him without showing any reason. Accordingly in absence to hold that the service of the concerned workman as pump operator under the management was either a contractual service or he was engaged as casual worker. It is seen that the concerned workman worked for more than 240 days continuously in one calendar year during the period ofhis service . Their Lordships in the decisions reported in 2001 Lab 1.C 2220 observed clearly that termination of service without complying provision of section 25F is improper and he is entitled for reinstatement if it is found that the concerned workman worked for more than 240 days in a year. Their Lordships ofHon'ble Delhi High Court as well as Gujrat High Court also observed the same view and the decision to that effect were reported in 2001 Lab IC 2243 and 2000 Lab I.C 1546. As such there is sufficient scope to say that the management arbitrarily, illegally and violating the principle of natural justice terminated the services of the concernedworkman and for which he is entitled toget relief in view of his prayer.
In the result , the following Award is rendered:-
5. It is seen from the order that engagement of Pump Operator was on contract basis w.e.f 2-12-92 till further order and his duty hours was from 6.00 A.m. to 10 Α.Μ. and from 16 P.M. to 20 P.M. The concerned workman also in course of his evidence relied on another office order marked as Ext. W- 3 by which the chiefG.M. Telecom, Patna requested for appointment of another motor pump man for smooth operation of the pump house . From office order marked as Ext . W-4 it transpires that the service of the concerned workman was terminated with effect from 16-3-94 with the observation " as the engagement of casual labour is completely banned the DGM( A) desires that the engagement ofcasual labour on contract basis , if any is to be terminated with effect from 16-3-94 . " The certificate issued by the management relating to work done by the concerned workman shows that since the date of his
The action of the management of the ChiefGeneral Manager, telecom , Bihar Telecom Circle in terminating the services of Shri Bijendra Kumar Das is not justified and legal . Consequently the concernedworkman is entitled to get reinstatement in his service without any back wages .
6034
THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
Management is directed to reinstate the concerned workman within three months from the date ofpublication of the award in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above .
B.BISWAS, Presiding Officer .
नई दिल्ली, 6 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2481.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नेहरू सांईस सेंटर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नं० II मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी-2./104 ऑफ 2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं० एल- 42012/177/2000- आई आर (डीयू) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 6th August , 2003
S. O. 2481. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT - 2/ 104 of 2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , No. II , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Nehru Science Centre and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-8-2003.
[No. L-42012 / 177 /2000- IR(DU) ]
B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2 MUMBAI
PRESENT
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT -2/104 of 2000 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF NEHRU SCIENCE CENTRE TheDirector,
Nehru Science Centre , National Council of Science Museums , Dr. E. Moses Road, Worli , Mumbai - 400018 .
V/s Their Workmen
Shri G.K. Maliye , 1/53 , Nagin Nagar, Sitaram Jadhav marg,
LowerParel, Mumbai -400013 .
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] APPEARANCES:-
Forthe Employer : Mr. B. G. Goyal&
Ms. Shilpa Bhatia,
Advocates .
For the Workman : Mr. M.B. Anchan,
Advocate.
Mumbai , dated 22nd May, 2003 . AWARD PART - I
TheGovernment of India , Ministry ofLabour by its order No. L-42012/ 177/ 2000 /IR (DU) dated 31-10-2000 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
Whether the action of the management ofNehru Science Centre in terminating Shri G.K. Maliye from the post of Technician B and on appeal reducing the punishment of compulsory retirement w.e.f 22-2-2000 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief Shri G.K. Maliye is entitled?
2. Workman Maliye was appointed as Painter Technician in Nehru Science Centre , Worli Mumbai , in the year 1982. By Claim Statement (Exhibit -7) workman averred that the management was suspecting him and prejudiced against him when the employees of the Centre started forming the Trade Union in the year 1990, and that consequently, with vindictive attitude due to union activities management had transferred the employees Kelkar and Khandvilkar . It is pleaded that through workman past record was clean and unblemished, due to his union activities he was transferred to Bhopal by the order dated 21-6-1990 and that the same being malafide he did notjoint therefore, the management issued him charge -sheet dated 27-11-1997. It is contended that the inquiry was held on the baseless charges and that charge- sheet was issued to the workman under rule- 14 of the CCS ( CCA) rules , 1965.He was not a Government Servant, and therefore, governed by the provisions of the Model Standing Orders , and therefore, the inquiry under the CCS ( CCA) Rules is invalid. It is contended inquiry was not fair in as much as workman was not given copies of documents listed in the charge- sheet, therefore, he could not prepare his defence statement properly , he was not given opportunity to see the documents and prepare the cross -examination of the management witnesses . It is contended though the charges levelled against the workman were complicated he was not allowed to take assistance of legal practitioner. It is contended workman was not knowing English , and therefore, he had requested for a Marathi version of the charge-sheet , however, that was not given, inquiry was not held in his presence and that his signatures were taken, on the proceedings already recorded , he was not paid subsistence allowance thereby he was handicapped. It is 6035 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
pleaded Inquiry Officer intervened in between and put leading question to the witnesses and that the procedure followed by the Inquiry Officer was erroneous . Consequently, it is pleaded, inquiry was against the principles ofNatural Justice . It is averred that the workman did not participate in the demonstration alleged to be held on 26-7-1990, however, the Inquiry Officer in his findings observed that workman was there in the demonstration. It is contended workman was not relieved, inquiry Officer held that workman by not reporting at Bhopal disobeyed the orders ofthe superiors , therefore, according to workman findings being not based on record and the evidence, are perverse and for all these reasons , it is pleaded, inquiry was conducted against the Principles of Natural Justice and fair play. It is contended based on the erroneous findings of the Inquiry Officer dated 11-10-1999 , the DisciplinaryAuthority removed the workman from service w.e.f. 22-2-2000, however, the Appellate Authority in appeal , bythe orderdated 3-5-2002 modified the order of removal to compulsory retirement.
the Appellate Authority on purely hnmanitarian considerations reduced the punishment to compulsory retirement with pension, gratuity and other retrial benefits w.e.f. 22-2-2000 . Management denied that for Union activities workman was victimised and that he was transferred with malafide intention. It is further denied that workman was not supplied copies of documents and that procedure was not properly followed. Management further denied that findings recorded were not based on evidence and documents on record therefore perverse. According to the management since workman was not suspended question ofgiving any assistance allowance does not arise and as he had not reported for work at Bhopal he was not entitled to any wages . It is pleaded that workman was governed by the provisions of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1965 and Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules 1964 as adopted by NCSM It is contended that proceedings were explained to the workman inMarathi by Mr. S. P. Luman, then Stores and Purchase Officer of the Centre , therefore, accordingto the management , domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as per the Principles ofNatural Justice and fairplay and therefore does not vitiate.
4. By Rejoinder (Exhibit -9 ) workman reiterated the recitals in the Statement of Claim denying the averments in the Written Statement.
5. On the basis of the pleadings following preliminary issues were framed at Exhibit - 10 and in that context workman Maliye filed affidavit in lieu ofExamination- in -Chief (Exhibit -14) and closed oral evidence vide purshis (Exhibit- 20) . In rebuttal, management Nehru Science Centre filed affidavit of AdministrativeOfficer Mr. Das (Exhibit -22) and the management closed its evidence orally on 9-12-02 .
6. Workman filed written submissions (Exhibit - 25 ) and the management Exhibit - 27 with copies of rulings (Exhibit - 28) . On perusing the record as a whole and the written submissions , I record my findings on the issues for the reasons mentioned below :
Issue
Findings
No.
1. Whether the domestic inquiry con- ducted against the workman was as per the Principles of Natural Justice?
2. Whether the findings of the Inquiry
Yes.
Officer are perverse?
REASONS
7. According to the workman Maliye , inquiry conducted against him was not fair in as much as charge- sheet was issued to him under rules- 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules , 1965 , however , he was not a Government Servant and he being an employee of Nehru Science Centre , an autonomous body, was an industrial employee and as no Disciplinary Rules framed for NSC Mumbai , he was 3. Management Nehru Science Centre resisted the claim ofworkman by filing written Statement (Exhibit -8) contending that the reference is bad for non -joinder of necessary party the Appellate Authority i.e. Director General , National Council of Science Museum (NCSM). It is contended that the workman governed under the CCS (Conduct) rules have been adopted by NCSM as the service condition . He was transferable to any of the centres and thatby the order dated 21-6-1990 workman was transferred to Bhopal , however , he did not report there though sufficient time given. It is pleaded workman instead reporting approached the A.L.C. (C ) , State Industrial Tribunal and the Court and that at his instance 100 persons made violent demonstration at the campus of NSC Mumbai on 26-7-1990 and that violent mob forced in to the conference room and manhandled Shri Chakraborti , the then Director, holding out in the open causing in the process physical injuries to him. It is pleaded for non- reporting to Bhopal as per the transfer order dated 21-6-1990 workman committed willful insubordination and that remaining absent , displayed lack of devotion to duty, behaving in a manner unbecoming of a Civil Servant and that by abetting political demonstration by disrupting in the normal functioning of the centre misbehaved and that by providing false information, failed to maintain absolute integrity and thereby violated Rule - 31 of Central Civil Service ( Conduct ) Rules 1964 adopted by the Council and for all these allegations charge - sheet was issued to the workman on 27-11-1997 . It is pleaded that workman replied the said charge- sheet vide letter dated 2-12-1997 which was found unsatisfactory, and therefore , domestic inquiry was instituted. It is contended Inquiry Officer giving sufficient opportunity recorded the findings by the report dated 11-10-1999 and holding the workman guilty based on the report the Disciplinary Authority imposed punishment of removal of workman from service, however, 6036
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
participate in the inquiry and it was ended. Documents filed with list (Exhibit - 12) clearly pointed out on the proceedings and that he had participated in the inquiry, therefore, hardly lie in his mouth that he was not given opportunity to defend his case. About non -payment of subsistence allowance, it is clearly seen from the record that the workman was not suspended pending the inquiry, therefore, question of payment of subsistence allowance does not arise .
governed by the provisions of the Model Standing Orders applicable to the Industrial employees. It is his further contention that he was not given copies of the documents listed in the charge- sheet, therefore , he could not prepare his defence properly. His third contention is that he was not given opportunity to study the documents and prepare for cross- examination . His fourth contention is that though charges were complicated he was not allowed to take assistance of a legal practitioner and fifth is that charge- sheet issued to him was in English, however, he does not know English, he had requested for a Marathi version of the charge- sheet but was not supplied , the sixth ground he had taken is that inquiry was not done in his presence and that proceedings were not recorded properly, the seventh ground is that he was not paid any wages /subsistence allowance thereby he was handicapped, the further ground he had taken is that Inquiry Officer was biased that the entire exercise of the management in holding the inquiry was vindictive he being the union activist. Management denied the same contending that inquiry was fair and proper.
11. The main grievance of the workman is that he does not know English whereas charge - sheet was issued to him in English and that proceedings were recorded in English, therefore , he could not prepare himself. On persual ofthe inquiry proceedings it is seen entire correspondence was in English , Charge -sheet was in English , Statements were recorded in English. So far language is concerned, according to the management , Mr. Mulani was appointed asthe translator but nothing to show he had explained to workman in marathi . It is relevant that the procedure is required to be explained and understood by the delinquent. Ifthe allegations are denied by the delinquent, the burden of proving the truth of those allegations is on the management. Their Lordships in Abujam Amuba Singh V/s . State ofManipur 2000 LAB IC 498 observed:
8. Their Lordships of the Apex Court in Sur Enamel and Stamping Works V/ s . their workmen 1963 II LLJ SCC pg. 367, ruled that enquiry cannot be said to have been properly held unless:
(1) the employee proceeded against has been informed clearly of the charges levelled against him;
(2) the witnesses are examined - ordinarily in the presence of the employee in respect of the charges;
(3) the employee is given a fair opportunity to cross examine the witnesses :
(4) he is given a fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence if he so wishes on any relevant matter; and
(5) the Inquiry Officer records his findings with reasons for the same in his report .
9. So for the charges are concerned according to workman those were baseless therefore inquiry vitiates . On plain reading of the inquiry proceedings filed with list ( Exhibit - 11 ) all the four charges have been clearly depicted and that the same are not vague and unambiguous .
"Further the Supreme Court pointed out that in an enquiry where the department is represented by a Presenting Officer , it would be the duty of the delinquent Officer , more particularly where a Class IV Government Servant whose educational equipment is such as would lead to an inference that he may not be aware of technical rules prescribed for holding inquiry, that he is entitled to be defended by another Government servant ofhis choice . If the Government servant declined to avail of the opportunity the inquiry would be proceed . But if the delinquent officer is not informed of his right and an over - all view of the joint inquiry of the delinquent and his superior officer shows that the deliquent Government Servant was as a comparative disadvantage compared to the disciplinary authority represented by the Presenting Officer and a superior officer, co -deliquent, is also represented by an officer of his choice to defend him , the absence of any one to assist such a Government servant belonging to the lower echelons of service would unless it is shown that he had not suffered any prejudice, vitiate the enquiry. Infact , justice and fairplay demand that where in a disciplinary proceding the department is represented by a Presenting Officer, it would be incumbent upon he disciplinary authority while making appointment of a Presenting Officer to appear on his behalf simultaneously to inform the delinquent of the fact of appointment and the right ofthe delinquent 10. In so far as recording of proceedings is concerned, workman admits that he had participated in the inquiry and that he had refused to sign the inquiry proceedings on 3rd March 1998. On perusal of the inquiry proceedings it is seen , inquiry was fixed on 3rd March 1998 but workman had waked out and that on 25-6-1998 , he had asked 15 days time and that he had refused that day to sign the inquiry proceedings . On 1st July 1998 he had not participated in the inquiry and that on 28-11-1998 he did 6037 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
totake help of another Government Servantbefore the commencement of inquiry. At any rate the Inquiry Officer at least must enquire from the delinquent officer whether he would like to engage anyone from the department to defend him and whenthe delinquent is a Govt . servant belonging to the lower echelons ofservice , he would further tobe informed that he is entitled under the relevant rules to seek assistance of another Government servant belonging to department to represent him. If after this information is conveyed to the delinquent Government servant, he still chooses to proceed with the inquiry without obtaining assistance , one can say there is substantial compliance with the rules . That is what has happened in this particular case . The petitioner herein studied only up to Class VIII and that too also in Manipuri Language and the inquiry was conducted by the authority in English . So , it can be very well seen that the petitioner suffered prejudice on this ground also .
(Conduct) Rules 1964. The Inquiry Officer in his report dated 11-10-1999 held that, that charge has been proved. However on perusal of the documents filed with list (Exhibit- 11 ) it is pertinent to note that transfer order dated 21-6-1990, reply letter of the management in respect ofthe transfer order dated 28-6-1990 , office memorandum dated 4-9-1990, 15-10-1990 and the correspondence in respect of the transfer order of the year 1992 all were actually given and received by the workman on fine afternoon of 5-9-1998 , When workman had received transfer order mentioning therein his reliving on 5-9-1998 hardly lie in the mouth of management that he had not reported to duty as alleged and thereby committed willful insubordination. The Learned Counsel Mr. Anchan for the workman submits that inquiry was initiated to find the workman guilty so as to oust him from employment and from the union activities , therefore, the fact that the workman was given all documents including the order of transfer actually on 5-9-98 the findings are totally perverse . ' Perversity ' is that when the findings are such which no reasonable person would have arrived at on the basis of material before him as pointed out by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Central Bank of India V/s . Prakashchand Jain reported in 1969 II LLJ 877. The findings ofthe InquriyOfficer that workman committed misconduct isthus not based on the evidence on record, and therefore, apparently perverse.
In the light of the observation as above , there is substance in the contention of workman that since he does not know English he did not understand the proceedings and therey prejudice had caused to him. "
12. So far non- supply of documents , workman in his cross -examination para 19 clearly admits that he had received the documents (Exibit - 11 ) however according to him, those were received when inquiry was abruptly completed on 5-9-1998 . Inquiry was admittedly actually commenced from March 1998 on the incident oftransfer of the year 1990 and that the documents were receivedby him on 5-9-1998 i.e. during the inquiry proceedings . Chargé- sheet is dated 27-11-1997 , inquiry was commenced on 27-1-1998 and on perusal of the documents filed with list (Exhibit- 11 ) , it is seen , copies were actually given and received by workman in the month of September 98 , that means , relevant documents were not supplied to the workman along with the charge-sheet thereby prejudice was apparently caused to him.
14. No tailor made system is to be adopted for domestic inquiry and that strict and sophisticated rules of evidence under the Evidence Act may not apply to all materials which are logically probative for a prudent mind are permissible as held in State of Haryana and Anr. V/s . Ratan Singh AIR 1977 SC pg . 151. It must be seen that principles ofnatural justice have been followed. Workman's contention is that he did not understand the questions asked in the inquiry as those were asked in English . The very exercise of inquiry is to bring the facts before the competent authority. The use of English language in a domestic inquiry when the workman does not know English , should have been avoided and discouraged otherwise inquiry would be an empty formality and its validityopen to grave doubt for which reliance can be had to the decision of Bombay High Court in Kumar Ram Nandan V/s . M/s. Fluid Power (P) Ltd. & Ors. 1987 II CLR pg. 269. Thus , apparently prejudice had caused to workman thereby enquiry vitiates.
15. The fact that Inquiry Officer recorded the findings or willful insubordination of orders when the transfer order dated 21-6-90 was actually received by workman on 5-9-98 itself lose the very purpose of inquiry. There is no dispute thatdepartmental inquiry is a quasi judicial one, There is a charge and a denial followed by the inquiry on which evidence is to be led and assessment of the material before conclusion is reached. These fact do make the matter quasi- judicial and attract the principles of Natural justice . The object of the principles of natural justice is to ensure that 13. It is significant to note that inquiry was initiated against the workman mainly on the ground that he did not report to duty at Bhopal as clearly seen from the evidence ofmanagement Administrative Officer Mr. Das , as per the transfer order dated 21-6-1990 thereby he had committed willful insubordination. According to workman he was transferred to Bhopal by the order dated 21-6-1990 which was malafide as he was so transferred, due to his union activities . According to him he was not relieved , therefore, question of reporting at Bhopal does not arise but still alleged against him that by not reporting to transfer place at Bhopal , he had disobeyed the order of superiors and thereby committed willful insubordination unbecoming of aCouncil servant violating Rule -3 of Central Civil Service
2333GI/2003-21 6038
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30 , 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
justice is done . The interest of justice equally demands that the guilty should be punished and that technicalities and irregularities which do not occasion failure ofjustice are not followed to defeat the ends ofjustice. Principles of Natural Justice are but the means to achieve the ends of justice . They cannot be perverted to achieve the very opposite and which would be a counter productive exercise.
16. As stated above , according to administrative officer Mr. Das, since workman did not join at the transfer place charge - sheet was given . It is to be noted that workman was transferred in the year 1990 and his cause was enquired in the year 1997. The Learned Counsel Mr. Anchan at this juncture submits that this itself smells on the intention of the management. The question whether in a given case principles of natural justice are violated or not to be found out on consideration as to whether the procedure adopted by the appropriate authority is in accordance with law and whether the authority has acted in good faith. Whether prejudice is caused to the workman is to be looked at from the angle ofjustice or of natural justice for which reliance can be had to Hon'ble Supreme Court in State Bank of Patiala V/ s . S.K. Sharma 1996 II CLR pg . 29. If looked the record as a whole in the light ofthe decisions supra, hardly can be said that inquiry was conducted as per the principle of natural justice and fair play and that the findings are not perverse . Consequently, inquiry as a whole vitiates .
[PART II-SÉC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 6th August, 2003
S.O. 2482. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT - 1 / 41 of1994) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court, No. I , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of College of Military Engineering and their workman, which was received by the CentralGovernment on 6-8-2003.
[No. L- 14012/43/93 - IR(DU) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , MUMBAI PRESENT
SHRI JUSTICE S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT-41/1994
Parties:
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF COLLEGE OF MILITARY ENGINEERING, DAPODI AND
THEIR WORKMEN
APPEARANCES :-
FortheManagement Mr. B.M. Masurkar, Adv.
For the Workman
17. Since inquiry vitiates , in view of the pleadings in para 2 ( s ) (Exlubit - 8 ) to the effect that in the event inquiry is held vitiated, the management be given opportunity to lead evidence to justify its action , going through the settled legal position I find proper to give opportunity to the management of justify its action.issues Nos . 1 and 2 are , therefore , answered accordingly and hence the order :
ORDER
The domestic inquiry conducted against the workinan is not as per the Principles of Natural Justice .
The findings of the Inquiry Officer are perverse.
Management is allowed to lead evidence to justify its action .
S.N. SAUNDANKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 6 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ ० 2482.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कॉलेज ऑफ मिलिट्री इंजीनियरिंग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं ० ] मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी.-1/41 ऑफ 1994 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं ० एल-14012/43/93- आई आर (डीयू) ] बी० एम ० डेविड , अवर सचिव
Mr. Ranganathan, Adv. State
Maharashtra
Mumbai , dated the 29h day of July, 2003 AWARD
1. This is a reference made by the Central Government under clause (d) of Sub - section 1 and Sub-section 2 -A of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act for short) for adjudicating the industrial dispute between Shankar Kamble ( the workman for short ) and Commandant College ofEngineering (the Employer for short ). The terms of the reference are given in the Schedule are as follows:
Whether the action of employer i.e. Commandant, College ofMilitary Engineering, Dapodi , Pune in terminating the services of Shri Shankar Kamble , Casual labour is proper, legal andjustified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled for ? " 2. The facts of the case are as follows :
Theworkman (since deceased) in his Statement of claim asserted that he was a casual labourer ( re-designated as Unskilled Mazdoor) in the College of Military Engineering, Dapodi , Pune from 01-5-1963 . His pay scale was as applicable to the Government employees. Initial appointmentwas for three months . But he was continued in service till 01-5-1989 . The workman claimed that his 6039
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
was workman within the meaning of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act ?
(ii) Whether Shankar Kamble remained in continuous employment of the College of Military Engineering till 31-5-1985 and his services were illegally terminated ?
(iii) Whether Shankar Kamble was entitled to be regularized in service ?
(iv) To what relief are the legal heirs of Shankar Kamble are entitled to ?
5. Thereafter, the legal representatives of the workman filed two affidavits for contesting the case on merits (i) B. Y. Kadam (ii) T. R. Krishnan. They were cross examined . Thereafter the employer filed affidavit of Lt. Colonel Vijay Kapur.He was cross -examined.
6. Thereafter , case was heard for passing the award.
7. It is necessary to consider issue No. 1. It consists of two parts . The first part is (a) Whether the College of Military Engineering is an industry. (b ) Whether the workman is covered by definition of workman asgiven in section 2(s) of the Act ?
services were terminated on 06-9-1989 w.e.f. 01-5-1989 on false grounds that ( i) he was over age at the time (ii ) He did not come through the Employment Exchange . It was claimed that the reasons given for his dismissal were contrary to the instruction of the Central Government. The Government of India had deemed regularization the workman who were employed as casual labourer without the recommendation of Employment Exchange on 24-12-1973 . There was another order of the Central Government that persons who were over aged should also be regularized. It was stated in the Statement ofclaim , that since the workman did not know his date of Birth, he was required to submit himself for Medical examination, at Sasoon General Hospital . According to Certificate ofthe Medical Doctor his age was 54 years on 06-12-1988 . According to the workman in normal sense he would have retired in the year 1994. i.e. 60 years which was age of retirement for an industrial worker. The workman claimed that be treated in service with effect from 01-6-1989 . He stated that he had raised an industrial dispute before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner . It failed, consequently, the workman stated that he had filed an application before the Administrative Tribunal. The Administrative Tribunal passed order dated 30-5-1994 ( marked Annexure W 21 ). Не claimed that an award be passed for his reinstatement, regularization of service and payment ofpay and allowance from 01-6-1989 till date of reinstatement or superannuation whichever is earlier . The workman expired on 10-3-1994 during the pendency of this reference . His legal representatives (i ) Widow Hazarbare Shankar Kamble (ii ) Son Shivaji Shankar Kamble ( iii ) Married daughter Chhaya Prahlad Bhonsle (iv) Son Mahendra Shankar Kamble were substituted. They have filed a separate Statement ofClaim but the contents ofthe Statement of Claim are not materially different . There are only consequential changes due to death. The substance of the claim has not much changed.
3.In hiswritten statement the employer inter alia pleaded that the College ofMilitary Engineering College was not an industry. It as a category Training Establishment Indian Army. It was stated that workman was employed in the year 1966. He was not workman within the meaning of 2(s) of the Act . The workman submitted his representation after 3½ before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner on 29-1-1993 . It was stated that workman could not be regularized as he was over aged. It was deemed that the instructions issued on 12th Feb. 1975 were applicable to the workman. The workman could not claim benefit ofletters dated 08-4-1991 as hewas not in service. It was stated that the workman's services werenot illegallyterminated. This is not a case ofretrenchment inviolation ofsection 25F ofthe Act . The workman also filed a rejoinder but it is necessary to refer to it.
Verma: The following issues were framed by Justice R.S.
8. The para (a ) of issue No. 1 is now being considered hereinafter. It cannot be disputed that the College ofMilitary Engineering is an ArmyEstablishment . Lieutenant Colonel Vijay Kapoor has stated in his affidavit that it is category Atraining Establishment of Indian Army. The functions ofthis college is given in Exhibit 9 ( referred to annexure K in the affidavit) . A study of that document shall reveal that its trains ( i) Officers (ii ) Junior Commissioned Officers ( iii ) equivalent civilians. It imparts training Corps ofEngineers asgiven inparagraph 36 ( a) to (k) . The Officers aretrained inEngineering subject to attain the standards equivalent to bachelor of Engineering degree and to non -commissioned Officers to the equivalent diploma courses in Engineering.Both officers and N.C.O. are given training in combat Engineering including techniques of camonflage , etc. To selected Officers it is also gives post graduate training. The other officers of armed and services are also given training in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering . They are also given training in courses necessary for warfare . Apart from army the college trainees form the Navy, Airforce, (i) Whether the College of Military Engineering is an industry and employee Shankar Kamble THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
6040
ParaMilitary forces and other establishment . The same training which is given to army personnel like strategic camonflage technique Bomb desposat etc. It also train Officers and ICO/NCOfromfriendly countries . It also carries on certain advisory projects . It is also clear from this document that it is duty of the Commandant to see that the training imparted is in accordance with " the general policy laid down by Army Head quarters and the instructions are based on publication approved by Army Head quarters . '
9. It is apparent that the college of Military Engineering is an establishment of Army. The core aim of the establishment is to impart training to officer and Junior Commissioned Officers of Corps of Engineers and Corps of otherArmed services like signals, Mechanical etc. It also trains selected personnel ofNavy, Airforce, paramilitary force and civilians. The emphasis is on engineering relevant to practical training which is utilized by Army for either for combat purposes or others. It is run by the Army. There is support to affidavit ofLt. Col. Kapoor from Exhibit M 10.
10. In the opinion of this tribunal the employer is right in contending that defence is sovereign function of the State and the College is established for imparting training useful for military purpose. The main beneficiary of the College of Engineering appears to be the Corps ofEngineers which is a wing of Engineering services of the army. However it is clear that theMilitary Engineering College is the college ofthe Army mainly for the Army and it is run by the Army. Such college cannot be dissociated with the sovereign functions of the State. i.e. defence of the realm ? The training imparted is from the point of view ofdefence . Therefore , the considerations regarding "education" while over - ruling the case of University of Delhi is paragraph 89 to paragraph 101 in the case Banglore Water Supply and Sewage Board vs. Rajjappa 1978 SCC (LS ) 15 do not apply. In the opinion of this tribunal , the object of College ofMilitary Training College is mainly to impart training to army personnel . It is not an economic adventure taken up by the Union of India. There is nothing on record to show that there was any servable unit of Industry run by the College ofMilitary Engineering where the workman was
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] employed. In view of this matter this tribunal holds it has not been established in this case that College of Military Engineering is an industry.
11. The conclusion of this tribunal is supported by the decision of this tribunal is supported by the decision Supreme Court in the case of Physical Research Laboratory vs. K.G. Sharma 1997 Lab IC 1912. In that case it was pointed out that although generally speaking the Banglore Water Supply ( supra) case held that research institute run without profit could be heldtobe covered by sections 2 (J) of the Act, the space research would be exempted. The reason was that knowledge acquired from space research was not intended for sale. In the case of P. Jois vs. Director of Central Institute of Fisheries 1986 Lab IC 1564 , a learned single Judge held that Central Institute of Fisheries , Nautical and Engineering was imparting personnel in deep sea fishing and allied operations but not for research . It was not an industry. The learned single Judge appears to have relied on the following observations of Supreme Court in paragraph 142(b) in the case ofBangalore Water Supply and Sewage Board:
"A restricted category of professions , clubs , co-operatives and even gurukulas and little research labs , may qualify for exemption if, in simple ventures , substantially and going by the dominant nature criterion, substantively no employees are entertained but in minimal mattes , marginal employees are hired without destroying the non -employee character of the unit."
12. For all the aforesaid reason, this tribunal holds that the College of Military Engineering is not an industry. It is not necessary to decide if the workman is covered by section 2(S) of the Act . It is obvious that no useful purpose shall be served by deciding Issues No. 2, 3 and4.
13. The reference aforesaid is answered by stating that the College of Military Engineering Dapadi Pune, is not covered by section 2 (J) of the Act . The reference , therefore , is not maintainable as this tribunal cannot decide a dispute which is not covered by the Act. S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer 6041
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
The Government of India by a reference order No. L-12012/144/2000- IR (B -I) dated 30-8-2000 had referred the following issues for adjudication :
का०आ० 2483.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रेवनकोर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण अलापुजा के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. नं. 105/00 ( सी) ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Travancore in relation to their Haripad Branch interminating the services of Sri . K. Anandan, Peonwith effect from 28-11-1998 is justifiable ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ?" [सं. एल-12012/144/2000- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 7th August, 2003
S.O. 2483.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ I.D. No. 105/00 (C)] of the Industrial Tribunal , Alappuzha now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank ofTravancore and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 6-8-2003 .
[No. L- 12012/ 144/2000- IR(B - 1)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL: ALAPPUZHA
(Dated this the 10th day of July, 2003 )
PRESENT:
SHRI K. KANAKACHANADRAN INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
L. D. No. 105/00 (C)
BETWEEN
The Assistant General Manager , State Bank of Travancore , Zonal Office , Panampilly Avenue , Kochi (Kerala) 682 015
AND
Theworkman of the above concern Sri . K. Anandan , S/o Kochukuttan, Puthenkandathil , Thamallakkal , P.O. Haripad, AllappuzhaDist.
REPRESENTATIONS :
ForManagement
Sri Cheriyan Kuruvilla, Advocate , Alappuzha
M/ s . H. B. Shenoy and
Ashok B. Shenoy,
Advocates ,
2. In response to notice from this Tribunal both sides entered appearance and filed their statements . In the claim statement of the workman it is stated that he was employed as a Peon in the Haripad branch ofthe management Bank from February 1983 onwards . During the period from February 1983 to December 1992 he was employed though continuously, some artificial breaks were made to his service. However from January 1993 onwards he was in employment continuously till the date of his alleged termination in the year 1996. According to him no appointment order was issued to him though he was all along working in regular and permanent vacancies of Peons inthe Branch. Although he was appointed against a regular post and was doing all the work of a regular Peon, he was not extended with any of the privileges and benefits to which a permanent Peon is entitled. All along he was treated as a temporary hand. He had made several requests to the management to regularise his service ; but no action was taken. In October, 1992 the management notified 151 vacancies of Peons in the News - papers and invited the application from outsiders . At that time also , the workman made request for his regularisation as a Peon by considering his long past service . Instead of considering his request , the management terminated his service on 28-11-1998. According to him such termination was in violation of Sec. 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act . Moreover, while retrenching him from service, the management had not complied with even the minimum conditions stipulated in paras 522, 523 and 524 of the Sastri Award which is cqually binding to the managment bank also . It is also alleged that while retrenching him from service, the management had retained many of the junior hands working as Peons . Morcover the impugned action on the part of the management is against all the guideline issuedby the Government of India to various Nationalised Banks including the management Bank which mandate regularisation and absorption of temporary workmen employed for 240 days whether or not they worked 12 consecutive months . Therefore his plea is for declaration that the termination affected in his case from 28-11-1998 is illegal and unjust and therefore he is entitled for reinstatement in service under the management and with the benefit of back wages and continuity of service.
ForWorkman
Ernakulam 6042
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8, 1925
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
sending. It was not for his appointment as peon in the Bank . Ext. W4 it is the photo copy of a memorandum sent by MW2 to the headquarters of the management bank on 20-11-1998. In order to keep clean the bank premises it was advisable that somebody should be appointed . Therefore MW2 made recommendation for giving him some kind of appointment . No doubt, in order to engage somebody on casual basis to complete any extra work, no approval from the Head Office is required. That could be purely at the discretion of the Branch Manager . Probably considering the service rendered by the workman in the Branch, the then Branch Manager made some kind of recommendation .
3. The management bank in their written statement had disputed all the contentions raised by the workman by putting an entirely different picture on the nature of service rendered by the workman . According to them they had never employed him as a Peon either on temporary basis or casual basis continuously for a long time from 1983 as alleged by the workman. Since he was not appointed in service , there was no occasion to terminate service also . To the knowledge of the management, he was only engaged by a Staff Welfare Committee to prepare tea to the staff members of the Haripad Branch. In the course of that , some of the staff members had utilized his service for their personal needs . Such services were rendered by the workman by sparing some time after the preparation oftea to the staff members . He was paid for the work done by the StaffWelfare Association . At no occasion he was employed by the Haripad Branch of the management bank and at no occasion he was paid any salary also from the bank . The work done by him was not supervised or controlled by any ofthe officers of the bank. He used to come to the branch at his own convenience and it was not at all compulsory for him to attend the bank every day at a particular time. Any person can claim status of an employee in a Bank only if he is appointed through the approved procedure of appointment . So long as he was not appointed in accordance with the any of the procedures, he could not be treated as an employee at that time. He was not borne on the muster roll and therefore the management has río responsibility to safeguard his interest as stated by him . His contention that Bank Manager had engaged him temporarily as a Peon is of no basis , because , the Branch Managers are not given such powers to appoint Peon or anybody even on temporary basis . Since he was not employed , there is no basis for his contention that his services were terminated with effect from 28-11-1998 . Therefore according to the management , there is no basis for any of the pleas raised by the workman .
5. MWI is the present Manager of the Haripad Branch in which the workman is claimed to have been working for a long time. MW1 has no direct knowledge about the engagement of the workman in the main branch because he had joined there only an year back . He has stated that he could say anything only as per records maintained in the branch. There was nothing to show that the workman was either appointed or engaged as a Peonat any time. According to him if at all the workman worked there, that was only as a helper for the staff in providing tea to them. Through him photo copies of the ledger sheet relating to the workman for about 10 years was marked as Ext. M1 . That photo copies were produced on the basis of apetition filed by the workman to produce all the ledgers relating to him and also vouchers given by him after accepting payment from the branch. Such an application was initially resisted by the management bank stating that considering the voluminous nature of the records , it was not practicable to produce all those documents before the Court. Finally, the management could produce only two documents relating to saving account maintained in the name of the workman in the Haripad Branch. For non- production of records sought by the workman , MW2 has got different explanation . According to him the non- production of the vouchers and other documents is because ofthe reason that normally salary slip and other connected details wouldbe kept only for a duration of five years or till the time of auditing.
۲ 4. Both sides adduced oral and documentary evidence. While tendering evidence , the workman had deposed his chief examination through an affidavit and thatwas fully in terms of the claim statement . In the cross- examination he had admitted that he did not get any appointment order and he never had signed the attendance register . He started work in the bank not on the basis of any appointment procedure . However, he asserted that he had been doing all along all the works ofa Peon and wages were paid to him after obtaining signed vouchers every week - end. The final payment was on the basis of passing of vouchers by the Branch Manager. According to him when a request was made to regularise his service , through Ext. W4 letter the Branch Manager (MW2 ) had made recommendation to accommodate him as Sweeper . Ext . W4 is a recommendation letter sent by MW2 to the headquarters ofthe management . Though MW2 has initially denied its sending of any such recommendation, later he admitted its
6. At the time of hearing the learned counsel for the workman has submitted that in identical situation this Tribunal had granted identical relief sought by the workman herein to two other workmen who were also working as Peon in some other branches in the management . The learned counsel brought to the notice two award passed by this Tribunal in I.D. 22/95 and 26/95. In I.D. 22/95 , it was the case of a workman who had served in different branches for different duration as a Peon . In that case it was admitted that the workman was employed on casual basis as Peon. In that case it was held that on certain period he had continuous service for more than 240 days in an year . Therefore, the termination effected in his case was declared as illegal . In the other case I.D. 22/95 , the workman 6043 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
concerned was engaged initially in the Haripad branch and later in the neighbouring branch also . In that case also management had admitted employment of him as Peon on casual basis . On account of the occurrence of vacancy due to the transfer of Regular incumbent , the concerned workman had occasion to work for a longer period as a Peon. In that situation this Tribunal held that the termination effected was without the compliance of Sec . 25 -F of the I.D, Act. In both the cases, according to the learned counsel, the workmen concerned were later given appointment as regular peons and they are still continuing in service. The learned counsel makes plea for the extension of identical relief to the workman concerned in the present dispute also.
The management could not explain the regular money transaction made by the workman fairly for a long time. For a tea boy such kind of deposit every week is impossible. The withdrawal was also more or less at the same rate of deposit . So long as management was not in a position to explain such kind of transaction , only plausible conclusion is that he was in employment in the Branch, need not necessarily be as a peon. It is a fact that there was definite employer -employee relationship between him and Bank management . In such a situation, the workman is entitled for protection as envisaged in Sec . 25 - F of the I.D. Act whenhis service was terminated. Therefore, the termination effected in his case has to be declared as violative of Sec . 25-F of the I.D. Act . As a result he would deem to be in employment till he is validly terminated by the management.
(Dated this the 10th day of July, 2003) K. KANAKA CHANDRAN , Industrial Tribunal
APPENDIX
7. So far as the present dispute is concerned the factual positions are entirely different . The Management had never admitted that he was engaged as a Peon even on casual or otherwise. But the management version is that he was only a tea making boy employed by the Staff Welfare Committee and the payment was also given to him by the staffcommittee. It is admitted by MW2 that staff committee is headed by the manager of the Bank.
I.D. No. 105/2000 (C)
Witness examined on the side of the management :
MW1 : Radhakrishnan Namboothiri
MW2 : Lekshmanan
Witness examined on the side of the workman :
WW1 : K. Anandan
Exhibits marked on the side of the management :
M1 :Ledger sheets (photo copy) of the S.B. A/ c for the period from 1987 to 1997 maintained by the management.
Exhibits marked on the side of the workman :
WI : Letter dated 9-11-99 sent by the management to the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Trivandrum.
W2 :Letter dated 18-12-99 sent by the workman to the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Trivandrum.
W3 :Copy of failure of conciliation Report sent by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Trivandrum to the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, NewDelhi.
W4 :Copy ofletter dated 29-11-98 sent from theHaripad Branch to the Zonal Office Ernakulam of the Management.
8. While going through the account ledger Ext . M1 Itcanbe seen that there was more or less regular transaction in the account operated by the workman . According to WW1 , the workman he was being paid on weekly basis for the service rendered by him as Peon. Ext . M1 shows that in almost every week an average Rs . 500/- is deposited in the account of the workman and very often there will be withdrawal also. The workman's case is that from 1993 to 1998 he was in continuous employment . The ledger sheets show that the workman had been withdrawing regularly amounts of various denomination from Rs. 350 to Rs. 500 and occasionally Rs . 1,000/- . This withdrawals are substantial while going through the ledger account details. If the workman was only a tea maker, there would be no need for depositing and remitting substantial amount every week. Therefore, such remittance and withdrawal will only lead to the conclusion that the workman was engaged continuously for doing some work in the Branch for certain period of time . In. the absence of any vouchers , it is impossible to arrive at a definite conclusion on the exact nature of transaction between the management and the workman. But one thing is certain . Every week he was getting regular payment coming to Rs . 500/-to Rs. 700/- and probably that was the wages he was getting from the branch. Therefore , only possible conclusion is that the workman was being paid continuously for the service rendered by him. But no positive conclusion is possible in which category he was employed regularly. It can be either as a Peon or as a cleaner or even as a sweeper . Whatever be the probability, he was working almost continuously from 1993 to 1998 and was receiving remuneration and therefore there was every possibility of completing 240 days of service on the alleged dispensation of his service.
6044
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 30, 2003/BHADRA 8 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2484.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011 /198/2001- आईआर ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th August, 2003
S.O. 2484. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 17/2002) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Kanpur ( U.P. ) as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute betweenthe management of Central Bank of India and their workman, received by the Central Government on 5-8-2003 .
[No. L - 12011 / 198/2001 - IR (B- II )]
C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR, U.P.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 17 of 2002 In the matter of dispute between-
Central Bank Staff Association The Asstt . General Secretary Central Bank Staff Association , C/ o BP Saxena , 426/W - 2 , Basant Vihar, Kanpur.
AND The Regional Manager Central Bank of India Regional Office 125 , Civil Lines , Etawah
AWARD
1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , vide its notification No. L- 12011 / 198 /2001 - IR (B- II) dated 11-2-2002 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal-
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] "Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in imposing the punishment of stoppage of two increments permanently on Sri Rohan Singh , Armed Guard vide order dated 23-8-97 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "
2. In the instant case registered notices to the parties were sent to file statement of claim vide notice dated 30-4-2003 fixing 24-4-2002 . On the date fixed when the case was taken up none appeared from the side of the workman nor statement of claim filed in the case . However, another date 6-6-2002 was fixed for the purpose . On 6-6-2002 Sri B. P. Saxena the authorised representative for the workman appeared and filed an application seeking adjournment which was allowed and 24-07-2002 was fixed for filing statement of claim in the case . Against on 24-07-2002 Sri Saxena appeared and made oral request for time which was allowed and case was ordered to be listed on 23-8-2002 whereafter several dates were given in the casebut workman failed to file his statement ofclaim in the case. However again on 25-4-2003 notices were ordered to be sent to the workman fixing 22-05-2003 for filing statement of claim and registered notice was sent in compliance or order dt. 22-5-2003 on 30-4-2003 . Sri Saxena appeared on 22-5-2003 and submitted before the tribunal that despite three reminders to workman he has not appeared to file statement of claim as required. One more opportunity to the workman was granted by the tribunal for filing statement ofclaim. Finally when the case was taken up for hearing on 22-7-2003 Sri Saxena appeared for the workman and informed the tribunal that the workman appears to be not interested as he is not appearing despite information to file claim statement .
3. Therefore , in view of the conduct and action of the concerned workman and also in view of the statement made by the authorised representative for the workman on 22-7-2003 and also in view of the fact that the workman failed to file statement of claim in support ofhis case despite availing of sufficient opportunity, the tribunal is left with no other option but to hold that the workman is not entitled to any relief for want of pleadings , pursuant to present reference order .
4. Accordingly it is held that the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof in support of his case .
5. Reference is answered against the concerned workman.
SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2485.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- कम-लेबर कोर्ट, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ एलसी/आर/ 146 / 93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-8-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-41012/44/92- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 7th August, 2003
S.O. 2485. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Case No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 146/ 93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-8-2003 .
[No. L-41012/44/92 - IR(B- I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
CASE NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 146/93
Presiding officer: Shri R.K. Dubey
Sri .Bihari , S/o Shri Bundha, AtS.D.R. No. 2378 , Bina Line, Nai Basti , Nanak Ward, Bina,Distt. Sagar
.....Applicant Versus
TheDivisional Railway Manager, CentralRailway, Jhansi
.......Non- applicant
AWARD
Passed on this 23rd day of July, 2003 1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L -41012/44 /92/IRDU dated 21-7-93 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of Central Railway, Jhansi in terminating the services of Shri Bihari S/o . Shri Budha Ex. Labourer w.e. f. 25-8-82 is justified. Ifnot what relief he is entitled to ?" 2333 G1/2003-22
6045
भारत का राजपत्र अंगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
2. During the pendency of the case , the workman expired. His Legal Representatives brought on record but today they were not present . Since their absence is not explained to the tribunal , therefore , it seems that the Legal Representatives of the deceased workman are not interested in this case. Therefore , this case is dismissed forwant ofprosecution.
3. As no evidence produced on behalf of the workman, the reference in question sent by the Labour Ministry is answered in favour of the management against theworkmanby holding that the action of the management of Central Railway, Jhansi in terminating the services of Shri Bihari , S/o Shri Budha Ex. Labourer w.e.f 25-8-82 is justandproper.
R. K. DUBEY, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
का. आ. 2486.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निषोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. I, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ 16 /1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-08-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-41011/69/95- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी
:
New Delhf , the 7th August, 2003
S.O. 2486. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central. Government hereby publishes the award (Ref No. CGIT- 16/1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. I , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-08-2003.
[No. L -41011 /69/95 - IR(B - I) AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, MUMBAI
Present:
SHRI JUSTICE S. C. PANDEY: Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO. CGIT - 16/1997
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Western Railway, Mumbai
And [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 6046
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
Their Workmen
APPEARANCES :
For the Management : Ms. Fernandes , Adv.
For the Workman
: Mr. M.B. Anchan, Adv.
: Maharashtra
State
claimed that the workman was not a member of the Union and consequently the workman could not be represented by the Union. On merits it was asserted that there was no restructuring of the grades . The workman was considered for promotion to the post of Chief Clerk. She was found unfit and therefore , her juniors were promoted . The workman had no right to promotion but only a right to be considered.
Mumbai , dated the 23rd day of July, 2003
AWARD
5. On 15-4-1999 Justice C. V. Govardhan appears to havedirected that the only issue in this case shall be in the same language as was given in Terms of Reference . Although the order sheet appears to have recorded only a part ofterm reference . This tribunal assumes that the issue framed was in terms of order ofreference .
Thisreference is made by the Central Govt . in exercise ofits powers vested in it under section 10 (1 ) (d) read with section 10 (2 ) (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 for adjudicating upon the dispute between Smt . N. Η . Masoorwala (the workman for short ) and the Western Railway ( the employer for short ) . The dispute between the parties is in respect of non - grant of promotion to the workman by the employer . The terms of reference are as follows:
6. Thereafter , the Union filed the affidavit of the workman . She was cross examined on behalf of the employer. She closed her case. She filed documents W1 to W6 In support of her case. The Employer, examined Mr. Manoj Kumar Asstt . Personnel Officer (MECH) as its witness. He was cross examined . Thereafter, the employer closed its case. The original file regarding the case of workman was placed for the perusal of this tribunal .
"Whether the action of the management of Western Railway in not granting promotion in favour of Smt . N.J. Masoorwala head clerk is justified or legal . " If not, to what relief should be granted ?
2. The Divisional Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachardi Parishad, Mumbai (the Union for short ) filed the statement of claim on behalf of the workman as it had raised the dispute before the Conciliation Officer.
3. The claim made on behalf of the workman that she was working as a head clerk in the pay scale ofRs . 1400- 2300. The employer restructured certain groups C and D staff with effect from 1-3-1993. As a consequence of restructuring the workman was entitled to be promoted and posted in the scale of Chief Clerk in the pay scale of Rs . 1600-2660 . The workman was not given the benefit of the aforesaid higher scale . Her juniors Mr. D.D. Gautam, Veena Khatri and Mrs. M. Pandit and several others were given that benefit from 1-3-1993 . It was claimed that workman be given same benefit from the date herjuniors were given the promotion.
7. The argument on behalf ofthe employer that the Railway is not an industry is stated to be rejected. On the face of it the function of Railways to carry passengers and goods. There cannot be doubt that huge organization of Indian Railways is an industry run by the State . It is part of the transportation industry. The commercial activity was taken over by the State of India from private companies which were running the Railways . The decision rendered by Supreme Court in the case of General Manager Telecom vs. Srinivas 1998 Lab IC 883 has over -ruled the decision reported in Sub Divisional Post Officer vs. Theyam Joseph 1996 ( 8 ) SCC 489 and Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees Association vs. Prabhadevi Telephone Exchange AIR 1987 SC 97. It was held that in view of Bangalore Water Supply vs. Rajappa 1978 I LLJ 340 al paragraph 143 , it should be held that State was running on Telephone Industry and was not exercising its sovereign functions while doing so . The running of an industry may be awelfare activity but when State enters in to the field of commerce and trade, it cannot say that it is exercising the functions of a sovereign state . We are entitled to draw a line between the Commercial functions and the other cssential functions of state for judging whether the state is running an industry.
4. The employer inter alia stated that this tribunal had no jurisdiction because the Railways performed sovereign functions under the Constitution of India . Itwas also stated that the workman was a civil servant and was not covered by section 2 (s) of the Act . The service conditions of the workman were governed by rules framed under article 309 of the Constitution. The appointment and promotion of the workman was governed by Statutory Rules and consequently the reference was not maintainable. The reference was liable to be rejected on the ground that Union of India was not made a party to the reference . There was inordinate delay in raising the dispute . The affected parties were necessary party to the dispute . It was also
8. However, there is another line of argument which has to be noticed. It is argued that Railways is covered by entryNo. 22 of Schedule 1 of Constitution . The workman is governed by Railway Establishment codć , Railway Services (Conduct ) Rules , 1966. The Railway Servants (Discipline andAppcal ) Rules , 1968 and the Railway Service Pension Rules, 1993. These rules are framed under Article [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
16047
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
309 of the Constitution of India. Therefore , impliedly the jurisdiction of this tribunal is ousted for the reason the workman is governed by a complete code regarding her service conditions. The workman was holding a civil post under the Union of India. She could not be subjected to provisions of the Act . The following observations of the Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Water Supplyvs. Rajjappa (supra) were pressed into service . In that case in paragraph 46 at page 375, Justice Krishna Ayyer, delivering the leading judgement stated as follows :
exercisingManagerial or supervisory power shall be from thedefinition ofthe workman. There is neither any pleading nor any proof that the workman exercised supervisory powers. The Supreme Court has held in the following case that a clerk is not a workman in absence of the exercise of supervisory or managerial powers in the case ofB.S.R.T.C. Corporationvs. State ofBihar, 1970 Lab IC 1040. Here it would not be out of place to point out that High Court of Bombay has held in the case of P.R. Kakil vs. General Manager, 1972 Lab IC 1071 that a teacher employed in the Railway School is a workman.
11. This tribunal is ofthe view that at time the juniors oftheworkmanwere promoted, her case was not considered asis clear from D.C. Staff No. 105dt. 20-7-1975 (W4) . Опе postwas kept vacant . She was not superseded. Therefore, thesepersons were not likely to affected when she raised the industrial dispute on passing of the order dated 2-7-1996 . They were , therefore, not necessaryparties .
" In any case, it is open to Parliament to make Law which governs the state's relations with its employees .Article 309 to 311 of the Constitution of India, the enactments dealing with the Defence Forces and other legislation dealing with employment under statutory bodies may , expressly or by necessary implication, exclude the operation of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That is a question of interpretation and statutory exclusion . "
12. The workman stated that the Railway Board decided to restructure the Group C and D categories of staff with effect from 1-3-1993 . She claimed that as consequence of restructure she was entitled to promoted asa Chief Clerk from the post of Head Clerk w.e.f from 1-3-93 . The first list was issued on30-3-1994 and the second on20-7-1995 . Her name was not included. However, note in second list indicated that her name could not be considered forpromotion because her Confidential file was not ready. Incross-examination she agreed that she claimed promotion togroupbearing pay scale Rs . 1600-2660 (New 6500- 10500) . She said up to 1-3-1993 there were not adverse remarks against her as they were not communicated. In 1994, the workman was given adverse remarks and she could notbe found unfit on the basis of these remarks . She claimed that she was not given promotion which was her due. She relied on the document W1 to W6 .
13. The employer Railways examined Shri . Manoj Kumar stated in his affidavit was considered and was not foundfit in hisaffidavit. In cross -examination this witness stated that witness she was not found fit in the year 1994 . Atthetime of second promotion, her post became Selection post . She was required to appear in examination. She did not do so. So she was not selected. He agreed that on 20-5-1996 the order regarding rejection of her promotion was passed. A post was kept vacant till that date as her A.C.R. file was not available and it was reconstituted . The rejection was on the ground that she was not found fit.
9. It is not in dispute that workman was employed as Head Clerk with the Westerf Railways . Although the order ofappointment has not been filed, it can be presumed that workman was employee of the Railway Administration which is owned by the Central Govt . Assuming that the workman was appointed as per Railway Establishment Code, it is for this tribunal to decide if the workman ceased to covered by Section 2( s) of the Act because he was governed by the rules mentioned in paragraph 8. This tribunal is of the view even if a person is governed byrules framed under article 309 like Railway and Establishment Code, he does not cease to be a workman. There is nothing in the Act to show such ouster. On the other hand proviso (b) to Section 9A of the Act indicates that a workman governed by the rules framed under article 309 of the Constitution mentioned therein and the Indian Railway Establishment Code are not required to be service with notice envisaged in the main part ofthe section for effecting a change in their conditions of service. The legislature itself has treated the persons whose service conditions are governed by Railway Establishment Code as workman in proviso (b) ibid. This tribunal cannot now hold by interpreting Railway Establishment code and the rules mentioned in paragraph of this Award that it was still implied that Act shall not apply. Such an attempt would amount to rewriting Section 9A of the Act and it cannot be done. The Act, therefore, applies and the case of the workman is not barriedby implication.
14. The original file ofthe case is examined by the tribunal . It appears from the file that as a consequence of order of restructuring the regular procedure was given a go by. The copy of the Railway Board letter dated 27-1-1993 addressed to all the General Manager of the Railways inter alia , provided that as a consequence of restructuring normal procedure followed for selection need 10. So far as the definition of the workman is concerned, it is held that Section 2( s) covers her case . It is not in dispute that workman was working as a Head Clerk in the pay scale of Rs . 1400-2300 . It is presumed for the sake ofargument that the workman was drawing more than Rs. 1600. The question is if these facts make a her workman. The definition of Section 2 (s) provides that persons [PART II-SEC. 3 ( if ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
6048
Competent Authority which stated that the entry against the workman is adverse . The order does not indicate the year for which the entry of adverse . Nor does it state anything about the representation of the workman. The matter was submitted again for review. The noting dated 30-10-1996 reads as follows:
not be followed and promotion was to given on the basis ofscrutiny of service record. (Paragraph 4) . It is also clear from paragraph 4.3 that all the vacancies from 2-3-1993 shall be filed following the normal procedure. It is obvious that promotion on account of restructuring was one time exercise restricted to persons eligible for promotion till 1-3-1993 . This letter is also marked as W 1 .
)
"Inrestructuring of cadre, the suitability of Head Clerk for promotion to the post of Chief Clerk was judged based on the CR for the year 1990, 1991 and 1992. Fresh CR's for year ending 31-3-1990, 31-3-1991 and 31-3-1992 of Smt. N.H. Mashruwala was framed and these CR's are average" . Manoj Kumar also stated that CR 1990, 1991 and 1992 were average . If this be position the case of workman was not considered properly on the view that her ACR was adverse. Since the concerned authority appearedto have passed order dated 29-5-1996 on the basis of newly reconstructed ACR it is difficult to hold how it came to conclusion on basis of those document that her ACR is adverse when it was recorded as average. Unfortunately, for the workman the matter was not reviewed on the ground that decision has already been taken.
15. The workman had stated that any adverse remarks for the years 91 , 92 and 93 were not communicated to her. The record placed before the tribunal showed that the original adverse remarks in the confidential reports ofthe workman from the 90-91 , 91-92, 92-93 were misplaced. It also appears from noting on the file that there was an adverse entry against the workman for the period 92-93 . It is noted in the file that the workman had made representation against those adverse remarks for years 92- 93. Thereafter, the workman was communicated that a post was kept vacant as her file regarding confidential remarks for the relevant years was being traced out because was missing . One post for promotion was being kept vacant. The file could not be traced out between 94 to 24-5-1996. Thereafter, on 24-5-1996 it was noted her CRS were received. They appear to be reconstituted ACRs . The file was placed before the competent authority Senior DEN HQ (ADMRT) . Hewrote on file as follows on 29-5-1996 .
" In view of the adverse remarks in the C.R. she is not found fit for promotion . "
Sd/-
29-5-1996.
Purusant to the aforesaid the workman was communicated order dated 2-7-1996 by the D.P.O. BCT. it is this order which is under challenge .
18. This tribunal therefore , concludes that case of the workman was not considered by applying the mind to the facts to case on 29-5-1996 . The inevitable conclusion is that it does not amount to consideration . It is found that the Confidential Report for 31-3-1990, 31-3-1991 and 31-3-1993 were average and not adverse . The workman was therefore, entitled to be promoted to the post ofChief Clerknow bearing new pay scale ofRs . 6500-10,500 with effect from 31-3-93 with all consequential benefits including payand allowances . The employer shall pay the difference inpay and allowance as if she was promoted from 31-3- 1993. She shall also be awarded the seniority due to her as a consequence of this award.
?
19. Since considerable time has elapsed the workman shall also be entitled to be considered for promotion for next post in accordance with rules in case the persons who are junior to her have been promoted to next cadre . The employer is directed to review the case of all those juniors along with that of the workman on each time her juniors were promoted. She shall be promoted the moment she was found fit to be promoted to higher cadre with all consequent benefits including pay and seniority.
16. This tribunal is of the view, if on 24-5-1996 Confidential Reports original or reconstituted whichwere placed before Senior DEN /HQ, as per noting dated 24-5-1996 , then there is no reason those report could be placed on record of the tribunal . The workman had stated that if she had not received any adverse Confidential Report for her work done by her prior to 31-3-1993 . Therefore, it was necessary for employer to rebut her evidence that she had received adverse report for 92-93 . It appears from the notings that workman had made representation against the report of 92-93 . If this be the fact it could be easily proved by proving the service of adverse report to the workman.
20. Accordingly, this reference is answered in terms ofparagraph 16 and 17 of this award. The workman shall have the cost of this reference amounting to Rs . 4,000 .
17. It appears from the notings dated 25-5-96 that reconstituted CR's of the workman were placed before the
S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ० 2487.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे, भोपाल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कम- लेबर कोर्ट, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एल सी/आर 196/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-08-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-41011/24/92- आईआर ( डीयू) ( बी- I ) ]
6049 "Whether the action of the management of Central Railway Bhopal in terminating the services of Shri Sriram, S/o Babulal (2) shri Ramlal , S/o Motilal and (3) Shri ghanshyam, S/o Chaitu Ex Casual Khalasi w.e.f. 12-3-84 is justified? If not, what relief they are entitled to?"
2. There are 3 applicants in this case one of them Shri Ghansham, S/o Chaitu is expired . Dispute ended with his death therefore this reference is to be decided for the remaining 2 workman.
अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 7th August, 2003 S.O. 2487. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Case No. CGIT/LC/R/ 196/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Jabalpur none as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Railwey, Bhopal and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-08-2003.
[No. L-41011/24/92 - IR (DU) (B - I) ]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT JABALPUR
(CASE NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 196/ 93)
PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRIR. K. DUBEY Shri Ghansham, S/o Shri Chaitu (Expired) 2. Shri Sriram , S/O Babulal , Bhagat singh Ward, Near Ram Mandir , Bine, Distt . Sagar.
Shri Ramlal , S /o Motilal , Bhagat Singh Ward, Near Ram Mandir , Bina, Distt. Sagar( MP)
.Applicants
Versus
The General Manager , Central Railway , Bombay
3 .. The brief facts of the statement of claim of workman are that the workman employed under the non- applicant as monthly rated casual employee . They are employed during the period from 3-5-83 to 12-3-84 continuously . When the workman completed 120 days of service , they are medically examined and recommended to be regularised but the workman did not regularised when the workman made the representation to the superior officers . Their services were orally terminated on the alleged ground. They have obtained employment by giving false employment card . It was submitted by the workman that after completing 120 days ofservice, they become a MRCL and are therefore entitled forprotection ofRailway servants and appeal rules. Their services have been terminated without following the procedure laid down in the discipline and appeal rules . It was prayed by the workman that the action of the management of Central Railway Bhopal is unjustified, illegal and bad in law and the workman should bę reinstated with full back wages and all other consequential benefits.
4. Non - applicant in his reply pleaded that the workman produced forged service record to enter into the service of the Railways . After checking , it was found thattheir service card is false therefore their services were terminated. Workman's termination is legal and proper and therefore the statement of claim filed on behalf of the workman be rejected.
5. The following issues are necessary for the just decision of the case;
1.Whether the workman were properly terminated ?
relief? 2. Whether the workman were entitled for any 6. Issue No. 1 ,
Non-applicants
The Assistant Engineer , Central Railway , Bhopal .
AWARD
Passed on this 30th day of July-2003 The Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L- 41011 / 24/ 92/IRDU dated 17-9-93 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal ;
It was submitted by the Non - applicant that the workman produced their service card to enter the services of the non - applicant . Service card was the base for any employce to enter into the service but after checking it was found that service card was not issued by the officials of the railways . The workman in their statement of claim is silent on this point . They made a very waguc reasons of the false employment card in para- 5 of statement ofclaim, it was not specifically picaded by the 6050
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
isjust and proper. Therefore the workman didnot entitled foranyrelief.
12. It is clearfrom the above marshelling and appreciation of evidence that the dismissal of workman were just and proper. Therefore the statement of claim filed by the workman is dismissed . Both parties should bear their cost themselves . Advocate fees is Rs . 1500/- if certified.
)
13. The reference of the Ministry is answered that the action of the management of Central Raiway , Bhopal in terminating the services of Shri Paul and Ramlal is justified.
R. K. DUBEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
workman that they obtained legal employment or service card from the velid and proper legal authority . This card is said to be issued from the Railway Inspector , Narrowguage , Dholpur . Management produced Shri Phoolchand Verma timekeeper , Railway Inspector Office , Narrowguage , C. Railway, Dholpur. Shri Phoolchand Verma produced the record of the Railway Traffic Inspector , Dholpur and also stated on oath that no certificate or card made in the name of Applicant workman by the Railway. He was cross examined at length but the applicant is unable to discredit him. applicant Sriram and Ramlal also produced on behalf of the workman in evidence . Both of them cross examined at the point of service card. Both of them gave vegue answers and told the court that they deposited Rs.2/ - for record and got a receipt of the amount but the receipt if any were not produced before the tribunal .
7. Workman also in his affidavit are silent on the point of service card . Their silence clearly shows that first they obtained or made false service or employment card and after showing the service card , obtained employment in the Railway . Now the question remains that whether they got any right in the service or not.
का०आ० 2488.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में; केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कम- लेबर कोर्ट , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एल सी/आर 54/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-08-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -12012/ 124/98- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 7th August, 2003
S.O. 2488.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Case No. CGIT/LC/R/ 54/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-08-2003 .
8. Any service is a contract between employee and employer . Contract is based on mutual trust , confidence , sincerity and honesty. When one person with an intention to enter the service at any cost produced false certificate or service card, then he breach the contract or trust. It is also settled law that such type of contracts which are based on mis - representation or forgery are null and void in law. When any contract is void-ab- initio , then the guilty party cannot claim any right or privileges from this contract. In my view. if any person enters by producing the false card into the service , then his service is itself void from the beginning, he cannot claim any right after completing 120 or 240 days of service . Therefore the workman didnot got any right from the service which were started on forgeries.
[No. L- 12012/ 124/98 -IR/B -I ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
9. The decision of CAT, Nagpur produced on behalf ofthe workman but the decision of the CAT is not binding on this court. it is also clear that the learned members of the CAT didnot examine the case from legal point ofview. Therefore this case of the fact did not help the workers .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT JABALPUR
(Case No. CGIT/LC/R/ 54/99) PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRIR. K. DUBEY.
10. Thus it is clear from the perusal of the evidence and pleadings of both the parties that the workman obtained their service by producing false card and hence their dismissal is proper, just and legal .
11. Issue No. 2:
.Applicant
Shri Vijay Kumar Bhargav, C/o Anand Kumar Jain, Advocate 34A, Teela Jamalpura , NearGopalMandir, Bhopal.
Versus
As I pointed out in the last para , the workman obtained the service by producing false card therefore no right accrue to them and their diamissal from the service 6051 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
The Zonal Manager ,
StateBank of India,
(संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. नं. 7ए/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-08-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Zonal Office,
[सं० एल -41011 / 1 /2001-आईआर ( बी-I ) ] Region- II,
Bhopal
Non-applicant
अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी AWARD
NewDelhi , the 7th August, 2003 Passed on this 31st day of July, 2003
1. The Government of India , Ministry ofLabour vide Order No. L - 12012/ 124/98/IR. I dated 6-1-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:
S.O. 2489.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (I. D. No. 7 -A/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IRCON International Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-08-03 .
"Whether the action of the management of Zonal Manager, State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Vijay Kumar Bhargav S/o Nand Kishore Bhargav w.e.f. 20-5-97 is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for ? "
[No. L -41011 /1/2001 -IR(B- I) ]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT NEW DELHI
Presiding Officer : Shri B. N. Pandey
I.D.No. 07-A/2001
Shri K. P. Singh
..Workman
S/o Shri D. R. Singh
2. During the pendency of the reference , management filed an application and submitted that the management Bank arrives on settlement with 46 employees . Applicant is also one of the employee. The case is compromised. Therefore , reference becomes infructuous . It was also submitted on behalf of the management Bank that the tribunal passed order accordingly. With the management's application, another application is also filed by the management which was written by the workman . Workman also in his application requested that the management is willing to give the job to the workman therefore he did not want to prosecute the case.
Versus
Ircon International Ltd.
Palika Bhawan ,
Sector XIII ,
R. K. Puram,
New Delhi.
3. It appears that both the parties arrives on settlement . Application filed by both the parties is proper and made without any undue influence therefore both of these applications are accepted. Since both the parties arrives on settlement , therefore No. dispute Award is passed in this case .
Management
AWARD
4. The reference ofthe Ministry is answered that the action of the management in terminating the services of workman Vijay Kumar Bhargav isjustified .
5. Copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules.
1. The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 41011 / 1 /2001 /IR (B - I) dated 16-1-2001 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:--
R. K. DUBEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
"Whether the action of the Joint General Manager, IRCON International Limited, Palika Bhawan, Sector- 13 , R. K. Puram , New Delhi - 110066 was within its right in terminating the services of Sri Gopal Singh and eleven other workmen on the respective dates as per details shown in the Annexure (I ) . And whether the concerned workmen could claim to be permanent employees ofthe IRCON Internati onal Ltd. ? If not fo what benefits and relief the workmen are entitled to? (Enclosure-Annexure -I ). "
का०आ ० 2489.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इरकान इंटरनेशनल लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण - कम - लेबर कोर्ट, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30 , 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
6052
PRESENT :
SHRIK. JAYARAMAN
:Presiding Officer
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO.476/2001 (Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 17/98 ) 2.After filing statement ofclaim by workman written statement by the management , on the basis ofthe objection oftheManagement Shri K. P. Singh one of the workmen of I. D. No. 7/2001 moved an application on 23-4-2002 to withdraw his claim from this court on the ground that his case is different from the case of other workmen. The application of Shri K. P. Singh was allowed and accordingly his case has been separated and he has been permitted to withdraw his case .
(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 between Sri T. Emmanuel Rajasekar and the management of Southern Railway, Chennai. )
BETWEEN :
3. Since the workman Shri K. P. Singh has withdrawn his claim and A/R of the management did not raise any objection to it the reference so far as it relates to Shri K. Ρ. Singh is answered as " the claim of workman K. P. Singh has been withdrawn" .
: I Party/Workman
Sri T. Emmanuel Rajasekar
4. Accordingly, No Dispute Award is passed in respect of the claim of Shri K. P. Singh .
AND
Dated: 28-7-2003
: II Party/Management
TheAddl. Divisional Railway Manager,
B. N. PANDEY, Presiding Officer
Southern Railway
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्त, 2003
APPEARANCE :
For the Workman
: Sri S. Vaidyanathan, Advocate
For the Respondent
: Sri P. Arulmudi & Co. Advocates
का०आ० 2490.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सार्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- कम-लेबर कोर्ट, चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. नं. 476/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-08-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-41012/154/93- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 7th August, 2003
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section (1 ) and sub - section 2( a ) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred this dispute for adjudication vide Order No. L- 41012/ 154/93 /IR-(B -I ) dated 28-03-1995 to the Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal and it was taken on its file as I.D. No. 17/98 . Subsequently, on constitution of this Central Government Industrial Tribunal , the said case was transferred to this Tribunal and it is re - numbered as I.D. No.476/2001 .
S.O. 2490.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I. D. No. 476/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on6-08-2003.
[No. L-41012/ 154/93 - IR (B - I) ]
i AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
2. The industrial dispute referred to by the Government of India in the above order of reference for adjudication is ' whether the action of the Southern Railway, Madras in ordering compulsory retirement of Sri T. Emmaunel Rajasekar , an Ex -cell man, Electrical Department, Car Shed, Tambaram , Madras w.e.f. 24-06-1991 on the alleged charge of misbehaviour and refusal to perform duties is just, proper and legal ? If not, to what relief is entitled' .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
3. The Hon'ble High Court of Madras in W.P. No. 8533 of 1997 dated 20-12-1999 has ordered to substitute the words ' removal from service ' instead of " compulsory retirement " in the above reference .
Friday, the 25th July, 2003 6053
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/भाद्र 8 , 1925
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4. The allegations of the Petitioner/l party in his Claim Statement are as follows :-
5. The Respondent /II Party in their Counter Statement has alleged that the domestic enqurity conducted against the Petitioner was in accordance with the provisions of Rule 9 of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal ) Rules . The Petitioner was permitted toperuse the documents and he was allowed to take extract ofdocuments , but without availing the same , the Petitioner has made complaint about the Respondent . There is no miscarriage ofjustice as alleged by the Petitioner and only after due consideration , the Reviewing Authority has rejected his request for change of Enquiry Officer. Only after due consideration of the entire matter , the Disciplinary Authority has passed a speaking order imposing the penalty of removal of the Petitioner from service . The Appellate Authority has also passed the order afterdue consideration of the facts and circumstances and materials produced before him. The senior Divisional Electrical Engineer is competent to appoint and remove the Petitioner and as such the order passed by him is valid and legal. The Railways is a public transport organisation and therefore , smooth function of the organisation is essential . In that the Petitioner who was working in the workshop of the Respondent has behaved in an indisciplined manner and therefore , the Respondent organisation has taken a departmental action and as such, the legal action taken by the Respondent is fully justified, legal and passed after complying the procedure laid down in Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal ) Rulcs , 1968 . Therefore, the Respondent prays that the petition may be dismissed.
6. For this , the Petitioner has filed a rejoinder statement , wherein he disputed each and every one of the allegations made in the Counter Statement and further stated that the punishment is not at all justified and valid as the charges are flimsy, baseless and falsely made up with vindictive motive .
7. When the matter was taken up for enquiry, both sides counsels have represented before my prede- cessor that the preliminary issue with regard to the validity of the domestic enquiry may be decided at the first instance and they filed their written arguments for thatpurpose.
8. On the basis of these things , my predecessor has framed a preliminary issue namely "whether the domestic enquiry conductedby the Respondent/Management in respect of the charges of misconduct levelled gainst the Petitioner/Workman is fair , proper and following the principles of natural justice " and on consideration of the written arguments submitted by either side and going through the documents filed by the Workman namely Ex. W 1 to W36 , my predecessor has come to a conclusion that the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondent is not fair and proper and it is vitiated and therefore , this The I Party/Petitioner namely Sri T. Emmanuel Rajasekar joined in the Respondent Railways as casual labourer ( ELR) on 01-07-1976 and subsequently, his services were regularised as Khalasi and then he was promoted as cell man on 4-12-1982 , which post has been re-designated as Khalasi Helper . While so , the Assistant Electrical Engineer , Operations , Tambaram of the Respondent Railways on 25-06-90 issued suspension order against the petitioner pending disciplinary proceedings exercising his power conferred under Rule (4) proviso to Rule 5 ( 1 ) of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal ) Rules , 1968. But on 6-7-90 , he had revoked the said order of suspension. Even prior to this date on 3-7-1990, the Divisional Electrical Engineer ofRespondent Railways has issued a charge memo against the Petitioner for the alleged disobedience , refusal to do the assigned work and for arrogance and misbehaviour . The domestic enquiry was also conducted by the Respondent Railways and during that enquiry , the Petitioner requested the Enquiry Officer to provide copies ofcertain documents , but he was not provided the same. Further, the Petitioner's request for change of Enquiry Officer was also rejected by the Respondent Railways . Thus , the Respondent Railways has conducted farce of enquiry with premeditated motive and has issued orders on 24-06-1991 for removal of the Petitioner . The Petitioner's appeal preferred against the said order to the Appellate Authority on 9-8-1991 has also met the same fate. Further , the Appellate Authority has not pronounced the orders till 21-10-1997 and therefore , the Petitioner approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) complained about the failure on the part of the Appellate Authority. But during the pendency of the said appeal before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) the Respondent Railways passed an order rejecting the appeal on 05-01-1993 . After the prolonged conciliation by the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , he has reported to the Ministry about the failure of conciliation proceedings . Hence, the Ministry has referred this dispute to this Tribunal . The Petitioner further states that the removal from service by the Respondent was illegal , unjustified and is against the principles of natural justice. The charges framed against him are false and fabricated. The said enquiry was not fair and proper . The order of removal from the service passed by the officer is invalid as itwas passed by the incompetent authority and the Disciplinary Authority has passed this order without applying his mindto the facts and circumstances of the case. It is not based on any legal or acceptable evidence and therefore, it is perverse and illegal . For all these reasons, the Petitioner I Party prays this Tribunal to pass anAward setting aside the order of removal from service passed againstthe Petitioner and for further relief.
2333G1/2003-23 6054
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tribunal has permitted the Respondent to let in fresh evidence to prove the charges of misconduct levelled against the Petitioner/Workman in the charge sheet dated 03-07-1990.
9. Therefore, the points to be decided in these circumstances are :-
1
alone was allotted to him and he has done the work in that coach and Coach No. 11.103 was not allotted to him and it was allotted to one Mr. Balachandran and only to take revenge against him, the management has falsely irtiplicated him and framed charges against him. Therefore , under such circumstances the burden of proving the fact that both the thyristor controlled motor coaches namely 11.101 and 11.103 were allotted to the Petitioner, and Mr. N. Balachandranjointly is upon the Respondent/Management namely railway administration . For this , the Respondent side relied on Ex. Ml, which is the copy of Work Allotment Register of the railway administration on 23-06-1990 . On behalf ofthe Respondent side , it was argued that the tape changer motor eoaches Nos . 11.003 and 11.038 werejointly ällotted to one Mr. Rengaraja Sekaran and Mr. S.L.Rajendran and similarly the thyristor controlled motor coach Nos. 11.101 and 11.103 were allotted to the Petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran and this is mentioned in Ex. Ml by flower bracket and it was put to indicate that the work was allotted to them jointly and as a combined duty and on behalf of the Respondent it was argued that this fact has been clearly proved beyond any reasonable doubt.
"( i) Whether the Petitioner Sri T. Emmanuel Rajasekar , cell man working under EF/ Inspection/Tambaram while working as such and nominated to check and attend to batteries of Thyristor Controlled Motor Coaches 11101 to 11103 , when instructed to attend the battery crate Nos . 1 and 4 of the Thyristor Controlled Motor Coach No. 11.103 in which connecting cable was found cut a at about 12.15 hours on 23-06-1990 by the duty chargeman , refused to carry out the orders , though the work was indentical to the normal work carried out in the batteries of Tape Changer Motor Coaches , whether he also refused to carry out the instructions given by the EF/ Inspection/Tambaram to attend to the above batteries ?;
( ii) Whether when AEE /Operations/Tambaram asked the said Sr T. Emmanuel Rajasekar to explain his problems for not attending the above work , he replied in an arrogant manner stating that AEE/Operation could do what he liked but he would not attend to work and remained without attending to the work and thus , the Petitioner/ Workman violated the Rule 3 ( 1 ) ( ii ) and 3 ( 1 ) ( iii ) of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal ) Rules ;
( iii ) Whether the action of the Respondent in ordering removal of the Petitioner from service with effect from 24-06-1991 is just, proper and legal ? and
(iv) to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?"
4 10. Point( s ) No. 1 & 2:-
In this case, according to the respondent Railway management that on 23-06-1990 , the Petitioner and one Mr. N. Balachandran, Cell man were jointly nominated and to check the batteries of thyristor controlled motor coaches 11.101 and 11.103 by their superior officers and they were instructed to attend the battery crate Nos . SI to S4 of Coach No. 11.101 and 11.103 in which the connecting cable was found cut by the Chargeman . They refuse to carry out the work and disobeyed the orders of their superiors . On the other hand , it is the clear case of the petitioner/Workman that the Motor Coach No. 11.101
11.But, on the other hand, on behalfof the Petitioner/ Workman, it is argued that even the Respondent's main witness MW1 , namely Mr. A.Perumal has categorically admitted that usually they will nominate one cell man for one motor coach and only the supervisor i.e. the Chargeman Mr. K. Chandrasekaran has allotted this work to the Petitioner and the other cell man and he further admitted that he has not allotted the work to Petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran on the same date because , it is not his work and it is only the work of supervisor namely Mr. K. Chandrasekaran . Therefore , under these circumstances, the bounden duty to prove the fact that the work allotted to the Petitioner/ Workman and Mr. N.Balachandran was a combined duty or work allotted jointly to them is upon the Respondent/ Management side . But , in this case , the Respondent has neither produced any documentary evidence nor produced any acceptable or convincing oral evidence with regard to this fact and the evidence produced on the side of the Respondent is unreliable one . I find some force in the contention of the Petitioner/Workman because when the main witness namely Mr. A. Perumal has categorically admitted that he has not allotted the work to the Petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran on the date and further when he has not stated who has made the flower bracket in the original of Ex . Ml and when the Petitioner has raised doubt over the flower bracket , the duty is passed upon to Respondent to establish this fact independently that the joint work was allotted to the Petitioner and Sr. N. Balachandran and it is the usual practice of the Railways that flower bracket will be made in the Work Allotment Register. But except the document Ex. M.1 , which is the doubtful document , as 6055 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30, 2003/भाद्र 8, 1925
admittedbythe Respondent's witness that at that timei.c . thedateofoccurrence , on 23-6-1990 , there was a dispute with regard to the seniority of the Petitioner, though he has not stated that any representation was made by the Unionwith regard to this fact . Since he has admitted that there was a dispute pending before the railway administration with regard to the seniority of the Petitioner, I presume that the Petitioner's immediate superiors have got some grudge over the Petitioner and therefore, they have foisted this case against the Petitioner.
14. Though it is argued in this case on behalfof the Petitioner that the Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer is not the appointing authority for the Petitioner and therefore, the action of removal from service of the Petitioner is not maintainable as invalid and bad in law, as it was passed by the incompetent authority. Since I find that the Respondent has not established the fact with regard to misconduct committed by the Petitioner on 23-06-1990, I come to the conclusion that there is no relevance in the arguments of the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Further, on behalf of the Respondent it is argued that even the first page of service register of the Petitioner, which is marked as Ex. M3 clearly proved that he Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer alone has signed in the register as an appointing authority and therefore , there is no doubt that Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer is the appointing authority to remove the Petitioner from service.
I have stated already, there is no documentary evidence to prove this fact on the side of the Respondent/ Management . When the Respondent's witness Mr. Perumal has admitted that even prior to 23-6-1990 combined works were allotted to cell men and there was document with the Respondent/Managementto show that the said joint work was allocated to the Petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran, there is nothing to prevent the Respondent's to produce the same. But except the solitary document Ex. M1 , there is nothing to show that it is the usual practice of the Railway management to allot joint work to the cell men. Further , when the Petitioner/ Workman has denied the allocation ofjoint allotment, the Respondent has to establish by clinches evidence that it is the usual practice of the railway management to allot jointwork to the Petitioner . Furthermore , the person who alleged to have allotted joint work to the petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran namely Mr. K. Chandrasekaran is very well available with the Respondent, but they have not examined the said Sri K. Chandrasekaran before this Tribunal for the reason best known to them and top of it, the allottees namely Mr. N. Balachandran and other persons namelyMr. Rengaraja Sekar and Mr. S.L. Rajendran were also not examined to prove these facts . Instead of that, much reliance was placed on the document Ex. Ml which is a doubtful one as I have already stated. Therefore, I am not convinced with the arguments of the learned counsel for the Respondent that joint or combined work was allotted to the Petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran andthe Petitioner has refused to do the work allotted to hini.
12. It is pertinent to note that even in the charge memo Ex. W3 ' dated 3-7-90 , it is not clearly mentioned that this work was allotted to the Petitioner /Workman and Mr. N. Balachandran jointly on that date , on the other hand, it is mentioned as if the work of thyristor motor battery was allotted to the Petitioner alone . Under such circumstances , I find some force in the contention of the Petitioner that on that date namely 23-6-1990 checking of only one coach namely 11.101 was allotted to him and he has checked the coach No. 11.101 and recorded his findings in the bettery maintenance register and the same was countersigned by the duty chargeman namely Mr. K.. Chandrasekaran under the original of Ex. W40.
15. Again on behalf of the Respondent, it is argued that in this case the misconduct of the workman proved before this Court would show that a thyristor controller motor coach had been placed in the inspection bay and that the two cell men including the Petitioner /Workman herein, on duty were unwilling to attend to certain defects inone of the coaches namely coach No. 11.103 and were pretending that they did not have the necessary skills and training to attend defects of this nature on the top changer coach and for this he has made sweeping assertions about the poor conditions of the equipment . But, on the side of the Respondent, it is clearly established that this allocation isonly made by the Petitioner to wriggle out the situation and fronı Ex. M1 , it is clearly proved that the work was jointly allotted to both the workmen namely the Petitioner and Sri N. Balachandran and they both have refused to do the work and in doing so , they took a political stand advocated by their trade union that the defects noticed in coach No. 11.103 could be rectified only on training imparted on them in thyristor technology. But it is clearly established by the Respondent side that the thyristor technology is not different from the tap changer system. The co- allottee namely Mr. N. Balachandran has adraitted his guilt and subsequently tendered his unconditional apology before the railway authorities and these facts 13.At this juncture , on behalf of the Petitioner it is argued that the Petitioner has often written letters and made many representations to the higher- ups of the railway administration with regard to his seniority and promotion and he has also complained about his immediate superiors in these letters . Only to take revenge against this , they have foisted this false case and they made concocted story that joint allotment was given to the Petitioner and Mr. N. Balachandran and the Petitioner has refused to do the work allotted to him. As aforesaid , I find some force in this contention because it is clearly 6056
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8, 1925
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6 clearly proved that only to escape from his liability, the Petitioner has taken this stand and this misconduct of the Petitioner is one of insubordination and even this single act of insubordination is sufficient for taking disciplinary proceedings and therefore , the Petitioner cannot take any shelter under any of the provisions of the Act . For this , the Respondent's side has placed much reliance on 1990 1 LLJ 295 SARABHAI M. CHEMICALS LTD . Vs. M.S. AJMERE AND ANOTHER is which case , it was mentioned even on a single act of indiscipline or insubordination , action can be taken against the person for dismissal of that employee . I find the facts and circumstances mentioned in that case is different and the ratio dissident is not applicable to the facts of this case . Further with regard to the allegation of arrogant behaviour of the Petitioner , there is no substantial or acceptable evidence produced by the Respondent before this Court to prove the same . In this case , since the Respondent ha not proved before this Court that the Petitioner has refused to carry out the orders of his superiors , I find that the two points against the Respondent .
Point No. 3 :-
W7
W8 16. In view of the above findings , I find that the order of removal of the Petitioner from service with effect from 24-06-1991 by the Respondent is not just, proper and legal.
Point No. 4 :-
W9
W10
W11
W12
W13
17. In view of my above said discussion that the order of removal of the Petitioner Sri T. Emmanuel Rajasekar from service is not just , proper and legal , the order of removal of the Petitioner from service is set aside . The Petitioner Sr. T. Emmanuel Rajasekar is ordered to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. However, on cosideration of the entire facts in this case and also on consideration of the circumstances shown before this Court , I find that the Petitioner/Workman Sri . T. Emmanuel Rajasekar will only be entitled for 50% ( fifty per cent ) of the back wages . No costs. The reference is answered accordingly and the same may be informedto the approrpirate authorities .
W14
(Dictatedto the P.A. transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th July , 2003. )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
W15
Witnesses Examined :-
W16
For the I Party/Workman : WWI Sri T. Emmanuel Rajasekar
W17
For the II Party /Management : MW1 Sri A. Perumal MW2 Sri J. Senguttuvan
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
Documents Marked
Ex. No. Date
Description
25-06-90 Xerox copy of the Order placing the Petitioner under Suspension.
6-07-90 Xerox copy of the order revoking suspension of Petitioner.
3-07-90 Xerox copy of the charge memo issued to Petitioner .
25-06-90 Xerox copy ofthe letter from K..Chandrasekaran , ELC ' A ' dutychargeman.
25-06-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Mr. Sanjeevi .
25-06-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Mr. Subash Chand.
25-06-90 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Sri A. Perumal .
18-08-90 Xerox copyof the explanation ofPetitioner to charge Memo. 11-07-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Senior Div . Elect . Engineer ofRespondent. 17-07-90 Xerox copy of the reply of Sr. DEE/RS /Tbm to Petitioner .
18-07-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE/ RS / TBM .
27-07-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Sr. DEE/RS /Tbm to Petitioner. 30-07-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE/ RS / TBM.
31-07-90 Xerox copy of the reply of Sr. DEE / RS / TBM to Petitioner .
2-08-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE/RS/Tbm .
10-08-90 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Sr. DEE /RS / TBM Petitioner. to 14-08-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE/ RS/Tbm .
6057 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 30 , 2003/ भाद्र 8, 1925
[[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
W35
9-08-91
14-09-90
W18
Xerox copy of the appeal preferred by Petitioner to Appellate Authority.
Xerox copy of the order of Sr. DEE / RS / TBM appointing EnquiryOfficer.
5-01-93
W36
W19
1-10-90
Xerox copy of the order of Assistant Personnel Officer/ Electrical to the Petitioner .
Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE/RS/ TBM for nominating defence assistant.
23-06-90
W37
W20
9-10-90
Xerox copy of the EMU periodical Inspection Schedule.
Xerox copy of the letter from Enquiry Officer to Petitioner.
W38
05-07-90
30-11-90
W21
Xerox copy of the letter from EnquiryOfficer to Petitioner .
Letter of the Petitioner Submitted to Office Superintendent Tambaram. (P) 4-12-90
W22
10-07-90
W39
Xerox copy of the letter from Electrical Foreman to Petitioner.
Letter from the Office Superintendent (P) to Petitioner.
8-12-90
W23
23-06-90
W40
Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE /RS / TBM.
Xerox copy of the written report of the Petitioner in battery maintenance register .
13-12-90
W24
30-06-78
W41
Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Sr. DEE/RS/ TBM.
14-12-90
W25
Xerox copy of the letter from Enquiry Officer to Petitioner.
19-12-90
W26
Xerox copy of the order granting temporary status issued by Divisional Superintendent of the Respondent to Petitioner as Substitute Khalasi .
W42
30-06-78
Xerox copy of the petition filed by Petitioner before Enquiry Officer.
19-12-90
W27
Xerox copy of the order of Senior DEE/RS/TBM to EF /I/ TBM.
Xerox copy of the order granting temporary status issued by Divisional Superintendent of the Respondentto Petitioner as Substitute Khalasi .
19-12-90
W28
4-12-82
W43
Xerox copy of the letter from Enquiry Officer to Petitioner .
24-12-90
W29
Xerox copy of the promotion order issued to Petitioner as Semi -skilled .
Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Enquiry Officer .
W44 16/27-08-83
11-02-91
W30
Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Enquiry Officer .
Xerox copy of the office order issued to Petitioner Redesignating his post of Khalasi Helper.
Nil
W31
Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings.
W45 16/27-08-83
26-04-91
W32
Xerox copy of the office order issued to Petitioner Reclassifying as skilled employee .
Xerox copy of the letter from Senior DEE / RS / TBM to Petitioner.
18-04-88
W46
25-04-91
W33
Xerox copy of the report of the Enquiry Officer.
Xerox copy of the application givenby Petitioner for Artisan training.
Nil
W34
26-05-88
W47
Xerox copy of the letter from Divisional Railway Manager's Office to Director , Advanced Training Institute.
Xerox copy of the order of Senior DEE/ RS / TBM imposing Penalty of removal from service against the Petitioner.
6058
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 30, 2003 /BHADRA 8 , 1925
For II Party/Management :-
Ex. No. Date
Description
M1
23-06-90 Xerox copy of the work allocation register for 23-6-90
M2
25-06-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Mr. Perumal to Sr. DEE/RS / TBM.
M3
Nil
Xerox copy of the four pages ofthe Service Register of Sri . T. Emmanuel Rajasekar.
M4
Nil
Original Service Register ofthe Petitioner.
नई दिल्ली , 7 अगस्त, 2003
का०आ ० 2491. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कम - लेबर कोर्ट , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एल सी/आर 113/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-08-03 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-41012/51 /95- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 7th August, 2003 S.O. 2491. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Case No. CGIT/LC/R/ 113 /96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Railwey and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-08-03 .
[No. L -41012/ 51/ 95 - IR(B -1) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT JABALPUR
Case No. CGIT /LC/ R/ 113/96
PRESIDINGOFFICER: SHRIR. K. DUBEY Shri Ganga Prasad ,
S/ o Shri Motilal Pyasi ,
Gram Devgaon,
PostBeohari .
.Applicant Distt . Shahdol (MP).
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
Versus
The Divisional Railway Manager , Central Railway, Manager
...Non- applicants
AWARD
Passed on this 29th day of July, 2003 The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. L - 41012/51 /95 - IR/B - 1 dated 17-4-96 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :
"Whether the action of the management of Central Railway Jabalpur (MP) in terminating the services of Shri Ganga Prasad S/ o Shri Motilal Pyasi , Ex . helper , Khallasi we.f. 3-8-91 is legal ? If not , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?" 2.Applicannt's statement of claim in brief is that the applicant is working under the non - applicant as Khallasi . In 1987 applicant promoted to the post of helper Khallasi . Applicant while in service fell sick of mental illness and remained under sick list and availed treatment from GovernmentMedical College, Jabalpur of Psychatrist from 14-9-90 to 19-9-91 . Management Non - applicant during this period issued a chargesheet against the applicant for unauthorised absence from duty. Without the knowledge ofthe applicant , departmental enquiry conducted against him and he terminated from service . When the applicant reported then the order of termination came to his knowledge . It was prayed by the applicant that the termination order passed against him is illegal . Applicant prayed that he should be reinstated with full back wages .
3.Non-applicant admitted that the applicant worked under him as helper khallasi . Non- applicant pleaded that the applicant is habitual absentee and on several times in the past , he remained absent from duty without taking the prior permission. Due to long absence of applicant, enquiry conducted against him, chargesheet issued , a notice sent to the residence of applicant but it returned back with the endorsement of the postal authorities that the applicant leaves his house from long time . Non- applicant conducted enquiry as per rules principles of natural justice followed in the enquiry. It is also submitted by the Non -applicant that the applicant never intimated them about the mantal sickness or condition . Applicant correctly terminated by the order of the management for his long absence. It was prayed by the Non- applicant that the statement of claim be dismissed.
4.My learned predecessor on 17-8-99 held that the DE conducted against the workman is viciated and null and void.
5.Now the case is to be decided on merits . Necessary [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 30, 2003/ भाद्र 8 , 1925
6059 issue for the just decision of the case is whether the applicant has sufficient cause to remain absent from his duty for long time.
the applicant due to his illness remained absent from 14-9-90 to 19-9-91 . Thus it is proved that the applicant has no sufficient reason to remain absent from his duty for such a long period. Therefore management's order resulting in termination of applicant is justified and legal because the only course or option left open to the Non- applicant to terminate the service of the employee remain absent for a full long year . Therefore the management's order resulting to termination of applicant is perfectly legal and valid. Applicant's statement of claim is rejected. Both parties should bear their own cost . Advocate fees is Rs . 1000/- if certified.
6. Applicant pleaded in his application that he fell mentally sick and treated by the psychatrist in the Government Medical Coillege, Jabalpur . This fact is denied by the management and management witnesses. Applicant was cross examined by the Non -applicant's Advocate in this respect . In para- 13 of the cross examination applicant stated that he went to his village . In his village , he suddenly got mental disease . He was admitted by the family members in Medical College. In para- 14 it was also admittedby the applicant that his family members did not inform the Railway Authorities and concerned Railway Doctor .
10. The reference of the Labour Ministry is answered that the action of the Central Railway Authority, Jabalpur resulting in the termination of applicant Ganga Prasad is perfectly justified and legal .
R. K. DUBEY, PresidingOfficer
(नियोजन और प्रशिक्षण महानिदेशालय )
नई दिल्ली, 14 अगस्त, 2003
का.आ. 2492.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, शिक्षु अधिनियम, 1961 (1961 का 52 ) की धारा 2 के खंड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और केन्द्रीय शिक्षुता परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए स्नातक और तकनीकी शिक्षुओं के लिए इंजीनियरिंग और प्रौद्योगिकी के क्षेत्र में निम्नलिखित विषय को अभिहित व्यवसाय के रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करती है , अर्थात्: -
1. मैटिरिअल्स मैनेजमेंट
7. There is no clear medical certificate issued by the Medical Authority filed by the applicant to prove his mental condition . Only one document No. A- 3 filed by the applicant . This A-3 is a photocopy of another certificate. This certificate is issued on 19-9-91 . Another document which is medical fitness certificate is also of the same date . Both of these documents were prepared after the long absence and termination of the applicant . This fact shows that these documents are after- thought or carefully prepared to create a defence in favour of the applicant for his long absence . Applicant in his statement of claim or in his affidavit did not name the doctor or psychatrist who treated him . If the applicant is admitted inMedical College then his case history and discharge certificate both are very relevant and important to prove the case of the applicant but none of these important documents were produced on behalf of the applicant .
[फा. सं. डीजीईटी -2 ( 1 ) / 2003- एपी ] एन. लंका, उप सचिव
(DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING)
New Delhi , the 14th August , 2003 8. After careful considering the evidence and documents produced on behalf of both the parties in my view it seams that to defend his long absence , applicant created these so -called documents but none of important documents relating to illness produced by the applicant. Itis also admitted that the applicant did not inform the non -applicant about his illness . Atleast applicant's family members can inform the authorities . If the applicants case is genuing then any one of the family members of the applicant informed the Railway Authorities about the condition of the applicant . Applicant remained absent from his duty for long time i.e. 1½ years .
S.O. 2492. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of Section 2 of the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961 ) , and after consultation with the Central Apprenticeship Council, the Central Government hereby specifies the following subject field in engineering and technology as designated trade for Graduate and Technician Apprentices for the purposes of the said Act, namely:-
1.Materials Management .
9. As the applicant did not inform the Railway Authorities about his condition , it is also not proved that the applicant actually fell sick due to mental sickness during this period . Then in my view, it is not proved that
[F. No. DGET -2 ( 1 )/2003 -AP] N. LANKA , Dy . Secy.
Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054. 2003 .