This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं०डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारतक राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 18 जनवरी 24, 2004 , शनिवार/पौष 28-माघ 4, 1925

सं. 4]

NEW DELHI, JANUARY 18-JANUARY 24, 2004, SATURDAY/PAUSA 28- MAGHA 4, 1925 No. 4]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप- खण्ड (ii) PART II Section 3-Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

the percentage of Hindi knowing staff has gone above 80%:

गृह मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2004

Office of the Commandant - 146 Battalion , Central Reserve Police Force.

[No. 12017/ 1/2004-Hindi ] RAJENDRA SINGH, Director (OL)

वित्त मंत्रालय

का.आ. 138.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में, गृह मंत्रालय के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय में हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान रखने वाले कर्मचारियों की संख्या 80 % से अधिक हो जाने के फलस्वरूप उन्हें एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:

(आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004 कार्यालय कमांडेन्ट-146 बटालियन, केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल।

[सं. 12017/1/2004-हिन्दी]

राजेन्द्र सिंह , निदेशक ( राजभाषा )

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi , the 15th January, 2004

का.आ. 139.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 (1949 का 10) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतदद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 12 ( 1 ) ( i ) के उपबंध इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 31 दिसम्बर , 2004 तक सेंचुरियन बैंक लि० पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

-[ फा. सं. 15/21 / 2003- बीओए] डी० पी० भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव S. O. 138. In pursuance of sub -rule (4) of Rule 10 oftheOfficial Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the.: lowing office of the Ministry of Home Affairs where

(281)

109 G1/2004 282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department ofEconomicAffairs) (BankingDivision) NewDelhi, the 6th January, 2004 S.O. 139. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby Section53 ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949) the Central Government, on the recommendation ofReserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of Section 12(1 ) ( i) of the said Act shall not apply from the date ofthis Notification to Centurion Bank Ltd. till 31st December, 2004.

[F. No. 15/21 /2003 -BOA]

D. P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy.

(राजस्वविभाग ) केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड नईदिल्ली, 9.जनवरी , 2004

(आयकर)

का० आ० 140.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा (1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(i ) अधिसूचित संघ अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी;

( ii) अधिसूचित संघ प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गति- विधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन ' न्यू महरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली -110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

(iii) अधिसूचित संघ केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले (क) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट) 10-मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता-70007 । (ख) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा (ग) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

[PART II SEC . 3(ii ) ] क्रम अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम

अवधिजिसके लिए सं. अधिसूचना प्रभावी है 1.

2-9-2000से मैसर्स इलादेवी कैटरैक्ट एण्ड

इंट्रा ऑक्यूलर लेंस रिसर्च सेंटर, 31-3-2003 गुरुकुल रोड, अहमदाबाद-380052

टिप्पणी: अधिसूचित संघ को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदनके नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयक आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन 'प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिकऔर औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 7/2004/फा० सं० 203/79/2002- आयकर नि.- II ]

संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II) (Department ofRevenue) CentralBoard ofDirect Taxes NewDelhi , the 9th January, 2004 (INCOME TAX)

S. O. 140. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause (ii ) of Sub- section(1) ofSection 35 of the Income -tax Act, 1961, read withRule 6 ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962 under the category "Institution" subject to the following conditions: - (i) The notified Institution shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities ;

(ii) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, "Technology Bhawan ' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi - 110016 for every financial year on or before 31st May of each year;

(iii) The notified Institution shall submit, on behalfof theCentralGovernment, to(a) the Director General ofIncome-tax (Exemptions) , 10-Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta-700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and(c) the Commissioner of Income-tax/Director of Income-tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was grantedunder 283

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्डं 3 (ii) ]

Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income tax to the designated assessing officer.

Period for which Name of the organisa-

S.No.

tionapproved

notification is effective

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, प्रभारी प्रशासन एवं

नई दिल्ली

कार्मिक प्रबंध विभाग

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक,

मुंबई

श्री एम० पी० कोठारी श्री वी० एस० दास

बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

1. M/ s lladevi Cataract & 2-9-2000 to 31-3-2003 Intra Ocular Lens

Research Centre, Gurukul Road, Ahmedabad 380052

Notes: The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates aswell in advance for the approval, to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction. Three copies ofthe application for renewal ofapproval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

प्रादेशिक निदेशक मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक-

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, प्रभारी

मुंबई

सरकारी एवं बैंक खाता

विभाग, भारतीय

रिजर्व बैंक, मुंबई

केनरा बैंक

श्री सी० एस ० मूर्ति श्रीमती सुप्रियापटनायक

मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक महाप्रबन्धक

ग्रामीण आयोजना भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक,

और ऋण विभाग , कोलकाता

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक,

मुंबई

श्रीआर. गांधी श्री के० सी० महापात्रा

सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

[Notification No. 7/2004 (F. No. 203/79/2002- ITA.II] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director , (ITA- II) नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2004

का० आ० 141.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम , 1970 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम (2 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्तियों को उक्त सारणी के कालम (3 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्तियों के स्थान पर कालम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंकों के निदेशक के रूप में तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगले आदेश तक नामित करती है :-

सारणी

प्रस्तावित व्यक्ति

बैंक का नाम

विद्यमान निदेशक का नाम

का नाम

श्री सुरीन्दर कुमार

श्रीमती सिवाली चौधरी

इलाहाबाद बैंक

प्रादेशिक निदेशक

मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक

भारतीय, रिजर्व

ग्रामीण आयोजना और

बैंक,

ऋण विभाग भारतीय

गुवाहाटी

रिजर्व बैंक, कोलकाता

श्री रमेश चन्द्र

श्री जी० के० शर्मा

बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा

प्रादेशिक निदेशक

मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक-

मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक, मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक

सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मुद्राप्रबन्धविभाग

विभाग

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक,

मुम्बई

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, मुंबई

श्रीमती ग्रेसकोशी श्री पी० विजय भास्कर

देना बैंक

मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक, प्रभारी

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक,

मुम्बई

विनियमनियंत्रण विभाग भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, मुम्बई

श्रीवी० के० शर्मा डा० के० वी० राजन

पंजाब नेशनल बैंक

मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक

प्रादेशिक निदेशक भारतीय रिजर्व

बैंक, चेन्नई भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, कानपुर

श्रीवी० घोष श्रीएस० गणेश

यूको बैंक

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक प्रादेशिक निदेशक भारतीय रिजर्व भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक ,

बैंक, चेन्नई पटना

श्री पी० सरन श्री ए० एन० राव

यूनियक बैंक ऑफ

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक मुख्य महाप्रबंधक

इंडिया

डीबीओडी, व्यय और बजट नियंत्रण

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक विभाग

केन्द्रीय कार्यालय, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक ,

मुम्बई मुम्बई 284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

3 युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ श्रीमती सूमा वर्मा,

इंडिया

महाप्रबन्धक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, कोलकाता

श्री एन ०पी० सिन्हा, मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक, मानव संसाधन विकासविभाग, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, मुम्बई

[सं० एफ०-9/2/2004-बी.ओ.- I ( i ) ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th January, 2004

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1

Dena Bank Shri P. Vijaya Bhaskar, ChiefGeneral Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai ..

Smt. Grace Koshie , Chief General Manager- in-charge, Exchange Control Department , Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

Punjab National Bank

Shri V.K. Sharma, Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India, Kolkata .

Dr. K.V. Rajan , ChiefGeneral Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Kanpur.

UCO Bank Shri S. Ganesh, Chief General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Patna .

Shri B. Ghosh, Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Chennai .

Union Bank

ofIndia

Shri A.N. Rao, Chief General Manager , Dept. of Exp. & Budgetary Control , Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

Shri P. Saran, Chief General Manager , D.B.O.D. , Reserve Bank of India, Central Office , Mumbai.

United Bank

of India

S. O. 141-- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of Sub- section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970 the Central Government , hereby nominates the persons specified in column (2 ) of the table below as Directors of the nationalised banks specified in column ( 1 ) thereof in place of the persons specified in column (3 ) of the said Table , with immediate effect and until further orders:-

TABLE

Name of the bank

Name of the existing directors

Name of person proposed

Allahabad Bank

Shri Surindra Kumar , Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Guwahati .

Smt. Sewali Chowdhary, Chief General Manager, Rural Planning and, Credit Department, Reserve Bank of India, Kolkata

Bank of Baroda

Shri Ramesh Chander , Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi .

Shri G.K. Sharma, ChiefGeneral Manager - in - charge , Department of Adminis- tration and Personnel Management, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai

Bank of India

K Smt . Suma Verma, General Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Kolkata.

Shri N.P. Sinha, ChiefGeneral Manager , Human Resources Dev. Dept. , Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai .

[F. No. 9/2/2004-B.O.I . (i) ]

RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2004

का० आ० 142.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण ) स्कीम, 1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी (उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्तियों को उक्त सारणी के कालम ( 3 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्तियों के स्थान पर कालम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंकों के निदेशक के रूप में तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगले आदेश तक नामित करती है :-

सारणी

बैंक कानाम

Shri M.P. Kothari , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai .

Shri V.S. Das Chief General Manager- in- charge , Department of Government and Bank Accounts , Reserve Bank of India , Mumbai .

Canara Bank

प्रस्तावित व्यक्ति का नाम

विद्यमान निदेशक का नाम

कारपोरेशन बैंक

Smi . Supriya Pattnaik , General Manager , Reserve Bank of India, Kolkata

Shri C.S. Murthy, Chief General Manager , Rural Planning and Credit Department , Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai .

Central Bank of India

Shri K.C. Mohapatra, Chief General Manager , Department of Currency Management, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai .

Shri R. Gandhi , ChiefGeneral Manager , Department of Information Technology, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai .

श्रीमती उमा शंकर, महाप्रबन्धक,, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , बैंगलूर

श्री जी.के. शर्मा, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक प्रभारी, प्रशासन और कार्मिक प्रबंधविभाग, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, मुंबई । 285 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन' यू महरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली -110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

ओस्विंटलबैंक

ऑफ कामर्स

श्री बी.के. वासदेव, प्रादेशिक निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, कानपुर

श्री करूणा सागर, प्रिंसिपल, बैंकर्स प्रशिक्षण कालेज, मुंबई

[फा. सं. 9/1/2004- बी.ओ. - 1 ( ii ) ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th January, 2004

(iii ) अधिसूचित संस्था केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारिण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्तअपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक (छूट) 10 मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल , कलकत्ता- 700071 , ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग, तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

क्रम अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम सं.

1-4-2002 से S. O. 142. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (c) of Sub-section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1980, read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980 the Central Government , hereby nominates the persons specified in column (2) ofthe table below as Directors of the nationalised banks specified in column (1 ) thereof in place of the persons specified in column (3 ) of the said Table, with immediate effect and until further orders:-

31-3-2005 TABLE

Name of the existing directors

Name of the bank

Name of person proposed

1. मैसर्स इंडियन कैंसर सोसायटी, सोलापुर-8389/2- बी, रेलवे लाइंस , सोलापुर -413003

Shri G.K. Sharma,

Corporation Bank

Smt. Uma Shankar, General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Bangalore.

ChiefGeneral Manager- in-charge, Department ofAdministration and Personnel Management, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

[अधिसूचना सं, 18/2004/फा. सं. 203/106/2003- Oriental Bank of Commerce

आयकर नि.- II ] Shri B.K. Vasdev, Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Kanpur.

Training College, Mumbai. Shri Karuna Sagar , Principal , Bankers

[F. No. 9/ 1/2004 -B.O. - 1 (ii)]

संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II ) RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy.

New Delhi , the 12th January, 2004 नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी, 2004

(INCOME TAX)

(आयकर )

S.O. 143. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has beenapproved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section(1 ) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act, 1961 , read withRule 6 ofthe Income tax Rules, 1962 under the category "Institution" subject to the following conditions :-

का.आ. 143.-सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम केसामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 6. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था" श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

The notified Institution shall maintain separate books of account for its research activities;

(i ) अधिसूचित संस्थाअपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख - रखाव करेगी;

(ii) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific& Industrial Research, 'Technology (ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और 286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

Bhawan ' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi- 110016 for every financial year on or before 31stMay of each year;

(iii) The notified Institution shall submit, on behalf ofthe Central Government, to (a) the Director ofIncome tax (Exemptions) , 10 MiddletonRow, 5thFloor, Calcutta-700071 , (b ) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and ( c) the Commissioner of Income tax/ Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year , a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under Sub-section ( 1) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of Income tax to the designated assessing officer .

S. No.Name of the organisation approved

Periodwhich notification is effective

1-4-2002 to 31-3-2005 M/sIndian Cancer Society, Solapur, 8389/2-B, Railway Lines, Solapur-413003

Note : The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) havingjurisdiction. Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[NotificationNo. 18/2004/F. No. 203/ 106/2003 - ΙΤΑ -II] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA-II) नई दिल्ली 12 जनवरी, 2004

(आयकर)

का.आ. 144.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " विश्वविद्यालय " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

(i ) अधिसूचित विश्वविद्यालय अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी;

( ii ) अधिसूचित विश्वविद्यालय प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिकअनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन ' न्यूमहरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

( iii) अधिसूचित विश्वविद्यालय केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक. लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक (छूट) 10 मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता-700071 , (ख) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग, तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

क्रम अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम

सं.

अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावीहै 1. मैसर्स इंडियन इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ साइंस , 1-4-2001 से

31-3-2004 साइंस इंस्टीट्यूट, पोस्ट आफिस, बंगलौर-560012

टिप्पणी: अधिसूचित विश्वविद्यालय को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 17/2004/फा. सं. 203/10/2003- आयकर नि.- II ] संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II ) New Delhi, the 12th January 2004

(INCOME TAX)

S.O. 144. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has beenapproved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1) ofSection 35 of the Income tax Act, 1961 , read withRule 6 ofthe Income tax Rules , 1962 under the category "University" subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The notified University shall maintain separate books of account for its research activities;

(ii) The notified University shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of 287 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Scientific and Industrial Research, 'Technology Bhawan ' , New Mehrauli Road, NewDelhi - 110016 for every financial year on orbefore 31st May of each year,

(ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव , वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन ' न्यू मेहरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली -110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

(iii) The notified University shall submit , on behalf ofthe Central Government, to (a) the Director General of Income tax (Exemptions ) , 10 Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta-700071 (b)the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, and (c) the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income and Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was grantedunder sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income tax to the designated assessing officer.

(ii) अधिसूचित संस्था केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल, कलकत्ता-700071 , ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा (ग) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी ।

क्रम अनुमोदित संगठन का

S.No. Name ofthe organisation approved

सं.

नाम

अवधि जिसके लिए अधिसूचमा प्रभावी है

Period for which notification is effective

1-4-2001 से

31-3-2004

1-4-2002 to 31-3-2004.

1. मैसर्स वर्ल्ड वाईड फण्ड फार नेचर, इंडिया, 172-बी, लोदी एस्टेट, नई दिल्ली-110003

I. M/s . Indian Institute of Science, Science Institute PostOffice, Bangalore-560012

टिप्पणी:-अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/ आयकर निदेशक ( छूट) केमाध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी । Note : The notified University is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income-Tax/Director ofIncome-tax (Exemptions) havingjurisdiction . Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[अधिसूचना सं. 16/2004/फा. सं. 203/36/ 2002- आयकर नि.-II ] संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II)

New Delhi, the 12th January, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

[Notification No. 17/2004 /F. No. 203/ 10/2003 -ITA. II] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA. II) नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी, 2004

(आयकर )

S.O. 145. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has beenapproved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause (ii ) of sub- section (1) of Section 35 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 , read withRule6 ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962 under the category "Institution" subject to the following conditions:-

(1) The notifiedInstitution shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities;

को. आ. 145.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था" श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(ii) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of (i) अधिसूचित संस्थाअपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख - रखाव करेगी;

288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

Scientific and Industrial Research , 'Technology Bhawan ' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi - 110016 for every financial year on orbefore 31st May of each year;

(iii) The notified Association shall submit, on behalf of the Central Government, to ( a) the Director General of Income-tax (Exemptions), 10 Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta -700071 (b)the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research , and (c) the Commissioner of Income-tax/Director of Income - tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation , on or before the 3 Ist October each year , a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income and Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income-tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income-tax to the designated assessing officer.

S. No.

Name of the organisation approved

Period for which notification is effective

1-4-2001 to 31-3-2004 1. M/ s . World Wide Fund for Nature - India, 172-B , Lodi Estate, NewDelhi- 110003

Notes : The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income- tax/Director ofIncome-tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction . Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[Notification No. 16/2004/F. No. 203/36/2002 - ITA. II] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA . II) नईदिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2004 (आयकर)

का.आ. 146, सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संघ " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ( ii ) अधिसूचित संघ प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव , वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन ' न्यू मेहरोली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगी;

(iii ) अधिसूचित संघ केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोदिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी , के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकारी क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो, पांचवां तल , कलकत्ता-700071 , ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी । क्रम . सं.

अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम

अवधि जिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है 1 .

1-4-2000 से मैसर्स अमाला कैंसर रिसर्च सेंटर, अमाला नगर, पो.ओ. थ्रिस्सूर- 680553केरल 31-3-2003 टिप्पणी:- अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव , वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी । [अधिसूचना सं.19/2004/फ्र. सं. 203/ 121 /2003-आयकर नि.- II ] संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II ) New Delhi , the 12th January, 2004 (INCOME- TAX)

S.O. 146. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the Income- tax Rules, 1962 under the category " Association " subject to the following conditions :-

(1) The notified Association shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities;

(ii) The notified Association shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research 289 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 12th January, 2004 activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, ' Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi- 110016 for every financial year on or before 31st May of each year ;

S.O. 147. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (c) of Sub- section (3) of section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-clause (1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970 the Central Government , hereby nominates Dr. Rabi Mishra, Member of Faculty, Reserve Bank Staff College, Reserve Bank of India Chennai as a Director of Indian Bank with immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri S. Karuppasamy, Chief General Manager -in -charge, Urban Banks Department, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

[F.No. 9/2/2004-B.O.I ( i)] RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2004

(iii) The notified Association shall submit, on behalf of the Central Government, to (a) the Director General of Income tax (Exemptions) , 10Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta-700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and (c) the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation, on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of Income tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income tax to the designated assessing officer.

Name of the organisation approved

S. No.

Period for which notification is effective

1-4-2000 to 31-3-2003

M/sAmala Cancer Research Centre, Amala Nagar P.O. Thrissur 680 553 Kerala

का.आ. 148.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों काअर्जन एवं वितरण ) अधिनियम, 1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्‌द्वारा श्रीमंती दिपाली पंत जोशी मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक हैदराबाद को तत्काल प्रभाव से एवं अगले आदेश होने तक श्रीमती देवकी मुत्थुकृष्णन , स्थानीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक , बंगलूर के स्थान पर आंध्रा बैंक के निदेशकके रूप में नामित करती है ।

Notes : The notified Institution is advised to apply in

[फा० सं० 9/2/2004- बीओ- I ( ii ) ]

रमेश चन्द्र, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 12th January, 2004 triplicates as well in advance for renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction. Three copies of the application for renewal of approval shall also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[Notification No. 19/2004/F. No. 203/ 121 /2003 - ITA. II] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA. II) नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2004

S.O. 148. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of Sub-section (3 ) of section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1980, read with sub -clause ( I ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1980 the Central Government, hereby nominates Smt . Deepali Pant Joshi , ChiefGeneral Manager, ReserveBank of India , Hyderabad as a Director ofAndhra Bank with immediate effect and until further, orders vice Smt . Devaki Muthukrishnan , Regional Director, Reserve Bankof India, Bangalore.

[F. No. 9/2/2004-B.O.I ( ii) ] RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी, 2004 का.आ. 147.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ष उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं वितरण) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा १ की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा डा० रबि मिश्रा, निकाय सदस्य, रिज़र्व बैंक स्टॉफ कालेज , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक, चेन्नई को तत्काल प्रभाव से एवं अगले आदेश होने तक श्री एस. करूप्पासामी मुख्य महाप्रबंधक- प्रभारी, शहरी बैंक विभाग , भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक मुंबई के स्थान पर निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

का.आ. 149.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के [फा० सं० 9/2/2004- बीओ- I ( i ) ] रमेश चन्द्र, अवर सचिव

109G1/04-2 290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)]

2005 तक अमरावती जिला केन्द्रीय सहकारी बैंक लि० , अमरावती महाराष्ट्र राज्य पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 2005 तक जिला सहकारी केन्द्रीय बैंक मर्यादित, धार, मध्य प्रदेश पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[फा० सं०1 ( 1 ) /2004-एसी ]

एम० सुब्रमणि, वरिष्ठ अनुसंधान अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th January, 2004 [फा० सं०1 ( 52 ) /98- एसी ] एम० सुब्रमणि, वरिष्ठ अनुसंधान अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th January, 2004

S.O. 151. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section53 readwith Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central Government on recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares that the provisions of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section II of the said Act shall not apply to The Amravati District Central Co-operativeBank Limited, Amravati , Maharashtra State, from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March, 2005.

S.O. 149. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949) the Central Government on recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares that the provisions of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Act shall not apply to Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Dhar, Madhya Pradesh from the date of publication ofthis notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March 2005.

[F. No. 1 ( 1 )/2004 -AC] [F. No. 1 (52)/98 -AC]

M. SUBRAMANI , Sr. Research Officer M. SUBRAMANI , Sr. Research Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2004

नईदिल्ली, 16 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 150.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 2004 तक जम्मूकेन्द्रीय सहकारी बैंक लि०, जम्मू, जम्मूएवं कश्मीर राज्य पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

का.आ. 152.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय स्जिर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 2006 तक नांदेड जिला केन्द्रीय सहकारी बैंक लि० , नांदेड, महाराष्ट्र राज्य पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[फा० सं०1 (29 ) /2003- एसी ]

[फा० सं०1 ( 2 ) /2004- एसी ] एम० सुब्रमणि, वरिष्ठ अनुसंधान अधिकारी

एम० सुब्रमणि, वरिष्ठ अनुसंधान अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th January, 2004

New Delhi , the 16th January, 2004 S.O. 150. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949) the Central Government on recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares that the provisions of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 ofthe saidAct shall not apply to The Jammu Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Jammu , Jammu & Kashmir State, from the date ofpublication of this notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March , 2004 .

S. O. 152. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) the Central Government on recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares thatthe provisions of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Act shall not apply to The Nanded District Central Co-operativeBank Limited, Nanded Maharashtra State, from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette till 31 March, 2006.

[F. No. 1 (29)/2003 -AC]

M. SUBRAMANI, Sr. Research Officer

[F. No. 1 (2)/2004-AC] M. SUBRAMANI , Sr. Research Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2004

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 153.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा का.आ. 151.-बैंककारी विनियमन, 1949 ( 1949 का 10) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/ माष 4 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1 प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान - परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्‌द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: -

उक्त अनुसूची में " विश्वविद्यालय अथवा आयुर्विज्ञान संस्था शीर्षक केअधीन छत्रपति शाहूजी महाराज विश्वविद्यालय , कानपुर " और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के बाद " मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता " और "संक्षेपाक्षर " शीर्षकों के अधीन क्रमशः निम्नलिखित अन्तः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

सं. क्षेपाक्षर अर्हता मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान

विश्वविद्यालय अथवा आयुर्विज्ञान संस्था

एम.बी.बी.एस. आयुर्विज्ञान तथा शल्य विज्ञान स्नातक

डी. एल.ओ.

कर्णनासा कंठ विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा

छत्रपति शाहूजी महाराज आयुर्विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय, लखनऊ

डी.जी.ओ.

प्रसूति एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान मेंडिप्लोमा

डी.एम.आर.ई. मेडिसिन रेडियोलाजी और इलैक्ट्रोलाजी में डिप्लोमा

डी.ओ.एम.एस. आफ्थेल्मिक मेडिसिन एवं सर्जरी

डी.सी.पी.

क्लिनिकल विकृति विज्ञान मेंडिप्लोमा

डी. आर्थो आर्थोपेडिक्स में डिप्लोमा

डी.टी.डी.

क्षय रोग में डिप्लोमा

डी.टी.सी.डी. क्षय रोग और वक्ष रोग में डिप्लोमा

डी.पी.एच.

जनस्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान में

डी.ए.

डिप्लोमा

डी.सी.एच.

बाल स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा

एम.डी.

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (सामान्य काय चिकित्सा ) ( सामान्य काय चिकित्सा)

एम.एस. सर्जरी मास्टर ऑफ ( सर्जरी )

मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी

(शरीर रचना विज्ञान ) एम.एस. ( शरीर रचना विज्ञान )

एम.एस. (आर्थो) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (आर्थोपेडिक्स)

291

एम.एस. (आफ्थे.) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (नेत्रविज्ञान)

मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (प्रसूति एवं स्त्रीरोग विज्ञान )

एम.एस. ( प्रसूति एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान) डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (प्रसूति एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान )

एम.डी. (प्रसूति एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान)

एम.एस. ( ईएनटी) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (कर्णनासाकंठ विज्ञान )

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (शरीर क्रिया विज्ञान)

एम.डी. (शरीर क्रिया विज्ञान) :

एम.डी. (फार्मा.) डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (फार्मोकोलाजी)

एम.डी. (विकृतिविज्ञान) डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (विकृतिविज्ञान)

एम.डी. (क्षय रोग) डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (क्षय रोग )

एम.डी.

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (क्षय रोग एवं वक्ष रोग ) ( क्षय रोग एवं वक्ष रोग)

एम.डी.

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (क्षय रोग एवं श्वसनी रोग ) ( क्षय रोग एवं श्वसनीरोग)

एम.डी. ( एसपीएम ) डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (सामाजिक एवं निवारक आयुर्विज्ञान).

एम.डी. (रेडियोलाजी) डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (रेडियोलाजी)

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान )

एम.डी.. (संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (प्लास्टिक सर्जरी)

एम.एस. (प्लास्टिक सर्जरी) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (प्लास्टिकसर्जरी)

एच.सी.एच. (प्लास्टिक सर्जरी ) 292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (बाल रोग चिकित्सा)

एम.डी. (बाल रोग चिकित्सा)

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (मनश्चिकित्सा)

एम.डी. (मनश्चिकित्सा)

मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (न्यूरो सर्जरी)

एम.सी.एच. (न्यूरो सर्जरी )

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (कार्डियोलाजी)

डी.एम. (कार्डियोलाजी )

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (रेडियोथिरेपी)

एम.डी. (रेडियोथिरेपी)

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (न्यूरोलाजी)

एम.डी. (न्यूरो) (ये अर्हताएं तभी मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सीय अर्हताएं होंगी जब ये किंग जार्ज मेडिकल कालेज, लखनऊ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में सितम्बर , 2002 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हों। ) [सं. वी. - 11015/5/2003- एमई ( पालिसी-1 ] पी.जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth) New Delhi , the 9th January, 2004

S.O. 153 In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 2) of Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) , the Central Government , after consulting theMedical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , namely :---

In the said Schedule , after " Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj University, Kanpur " under the heading "University or Medical Institution " and the entries relating thereto under the headings "Recognised Medical Qualifications " and " Abbreviation " the following shall respectively be inserted , namely :-

Abbreviation Recognised Medical Qualification

University or Medical Institution

M.B.B.S. "Chhatrapati Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery

Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

D.L.O. Diploma in Oto-Rhino- Laryngology

D.G.O. Diploma in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

DM.RE. Diploma in Medicine Radiology and Electrology

D.O.M.S. Diploma in Ophthalmic Medicineand Surgery

D.C.P. Diploma in Clinical Pathology

D. Ortho.

Diploma in Orthopaedics

D.T.D. Diploma in Tuberculosis diseases

D.T.C.D. Diploma in Tuberculosis and Chest Diseases

D.PH. Diploma in PublicHealth

D.A. Diploma in Anaesthesio- logy

Diploma in Child Health

Doctor ofMedicine (GeneralMedicine)

D.CH MD (Genl.Med.)

MS( Surgery) Masterof Surgery (Surgery)

MS(Anat .) Master of Surgery (Anatomy)

MS(Ortho.) Masterof Surgery (Orthopaedics)

MS(Oph. ) Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)

Master of Surgery (Obstetrics and Gynaecology).

MS (Obst.& Gynae.)

MD (Obst. Gynae.) Doctor of Medicine (Obstetrics and Gynaecology)

MS(ENT) Master of Surgery (Oto-Rhino- Laryngology)

MD(Phy.) Doctor ofMedicine (Physiology)

MD(Pharm.) Doctor ofMedicine (Pharmacology)

MD(Path) Doctor ofMedicine (Pathology)

MD(TB) Doctor ofMedicine (Tuberculosis)

Doctor ofMedicine (TB & Chest Diseases)

MD(TB& ChestDise.) Doctor ofMedicine (TB& Resp . Diseases)

MD (TB& Res.Dise.) 293 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/ माघ 4 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

करती है कि भारत में डा. आलम महबूब द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिसकरने की अवधि:-

MD(S.P.M.)

Doctor ofMedicine (Social and Preventive Medicine)

(क ) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह माह कीअवधि; अथवा

MD (Radiology)

Doctor ofMedicine (Radiology)

MD(Anaes. )

(ख) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा. आलम महबूब , क्रिश्चियन मेडिकल कालेज एंड हास्पिटल , वेल्लौर, पी.ओ. थोरापाडी-632002 से जुड़े हैं , जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी । Doctor ofMedicine (Anaesthesiology)

[सं. वी.- 11016/1/2003 - एमई ( नीति- I ) ]

MS (Pl. Surg.)

Master of Surgery (Plastic Surgery )

पी.जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव

M.Ch. (Pl . Surg.)

NewDelhi , the 13th January, 2004 Master of Surgery (Plastic Surgery )

MD(Paed.)

Doctor ofMedicine (Paediatrics)

MD(Psy.)

S.O. 154. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by University of Dhaka is a recognised medical qualificationfor the purpose ofthe Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) under Section 14 ofthe said Act; Doctor ofMedicine (Psychiatry)

M.Ch. (Neuro-Surg.)

Masterof Surgery (Neuro-Surgery)

MD(Card.)

And whereas Dr. Alam Mahbub ; Bangladeshi national , who possess the said qualification is attached to Christian Medical College and Hospital , Vellore P.О. , Thorapadi for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;

Doctor ofMedicine (Cardiology)

Doctor ofMedicine (Radio-Therapy)

MD (Radio- Therapy)

MD(Neuro .)

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section ( 1) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period ofpractice ofmedicine by Dr. Alam Mahbub in India shall be limited to:-

Doctor ofMedicine (Neurology)

(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of thisnotification ; or

(These qualifications shall be recognised medical qualifications when granted in or after September, 2002 in respect of students being trained at King George's Medical College, Lucknow)" .

(b) the period during which Dr. Alam Mahbub is attached to Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore P.O. , Thorapadi -632002 , whichever is shorter.

[No. V. - 11015/5/2003-ME(Policy- I)]

[No. V. - 11016/1/2003 -ME (Policy-1) ] P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2004

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी, 2004 का.आ. 154.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ ढाका द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम.बी.बी.एस. उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;

का.आ. 155.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ पेराडेनिया द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम.बी.बी.एस. उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;

और, डा. आलम महबूब , बंग्लादेश के नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है, क्रिश्चियन मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड हास्पिटल , वेल्लौर , पी.ओ. थोरापाडी से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न किव्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं;

और, डा. चंदिमा लीलांगनी डी सिल्वा, श्रीलंका के नागरिक , जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साईं इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ हायर मेडिकल साइंसेज, प्रशान्तिग्राम , जिला-अनंतपुर ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं;

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट 294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii))

द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम.बी.बी.एस. उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;

अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती हैं कि भारत में डा. चंदिमा लीलांगनी डी सिल्वा द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधि:-

(क ) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह माह कीअवधि; अथवा

और, डा. हेलेना बेगम , बांग्लादेश की नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है , विश्व स्वास्थ्य संगठन, दक्षिण पूर्व एशिया क्षेत्रीय कार्यशाला, आई.पी. इस्टेट, नई दिल्ली -110002 से धर्मार्थ (चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़ी हैं;

(ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा. चंदिमा लीलांगनी डी सिल्वा, श्री सत्य साईं इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ हायर मेडिकल साइंसेज , प्रशान्तिग्राम, जिला-अनंतपुर ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) से जुड़े हैं, जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी ।

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा (1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. हेलेना बेगम द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधि:-

[ सं . वी. - 11016/ 1/2003 - एमई ( नीति-1 ) ]

( क ) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह माह कीअवधि; अथवा

पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th January, 2004

(ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा. हेलेना बेगम , विश्व स्वास्थ्य संगठन, दक्षिण पूर्व एशिया क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, आई.पी. इस्टेट, नई दिल्ली-110002 से जुड़े हैं , जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी।

[सं. वी. - 11016/1/2003 - एमई ( नीति -1 ) ] S.O. 155.--Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted by University of Peradeniya , Sri Lanka , is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the saidAct;

पी. जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 13th January, 2004 Andwhereas Dr. Chandima Lilangani De Silva, Sri Lankan national , who possess the said qualification is attached to Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences , Prashanthigram , Dist . Anantapur (Andhra Pradesh) for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;

S.O. 156. Whereas medical qualification MBBS granted byUniversity of Rajshahi is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 ofthe said Act ;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Chandima Lilangani De Silva in India shall be limited to :-

And whereas Dr. Helena Begum, Bangladeshi national , who possess the said qualification is attached to World Health Organisation, South East Asia Regional Office , I.P. Estate, New Delhi - 110002 for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;

(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification; or

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Helena Begum in India shall be limited to:-

(b) the period during which Dr. Chandima Lilangani De Silva, is attached to Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences , Prashanthigram, Dist . Anantapur (Andhra Pradesh ) whichever is shorter .

(a) a period of six months from the date of issue of this notification; or

[No. V. - 11016/ 1/2003 -ME (Policy-1)]

P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2004

(b) the period during which Dr. Helena Begum is attached to World Health Organisation , South East Asia Regional Office , I.P. Estate, New Delhi - 110002 whichever is shorter.

का.आ. 156.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ राजशाही

[No. V- 11016/ 1/2003 -ME (Policy- 1) ] P. G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24 , 2004/माघ 4, 1925

295 उपभोक्तामामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2003

का०आ ० 157.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स क्राउन इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स , 331 -ए, पोलाची मेन रोड, साई नगर, कोयम्बटूर -641021 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-3 ) वाले " सी ई डब्ल्यू- टी टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्राउन" है (जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 289 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग-3 ) अंकक सूचन सहित (टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

है। स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जाती और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के हैं , जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 222 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/ MAGHA 4, 1925

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2003

S.O. 157. Wheras the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMea- sures(Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of, non - automatic Weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication ( herein referred to as the Model ) belonging to Medium accuracy class (accu- racy class - III ) and " CEW -TT " series with brand name " CROWN" , manufactured by M/s Crown Engineering Works, 331 -A, Polachi Main Road , Sai Nagar, Coimbatore -641021 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/289;

The said Model ( See the figure given) is a strain guage type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity 30kg, minimum capacity 100g and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy Class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 5g. The display unit is of light emitting diode ( LED ) type . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 hertz alternate current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening the machine for fraudulent practices.

CROWN

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with the number of verfication scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 222)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 297

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 158.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स क्राउन इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, 331 - ए, पोलाची मेन रोड, साई नगर , कोयम्बटूर -641021 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्य यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " सी ई डब्ल्यू- पी टी" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्राउन " है (जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /290 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग-3 ) अंकात सूचन सहित (प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन प्रकार का है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जाती है।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिस से अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान केलिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. या उससे ऊपर और 1000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (222 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 GI/04-3 298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA. 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] New Delhi , the 24th December, 2003

S.O. 158. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Mea- sures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of, non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication (herein referred to as said Model ) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy Class - III) and " CEW- PT " series with brand name " CROWN " manufactured by M/ s Crown Engineering Works , 331 -A, Polachi Main Road , Sai Nagar, Coimbatore -64102 land which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2003/290;

The said Model (See the figure given) is a strain guage tpye load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with digital indication of maximum capacity 500kg, minimum capacity 2kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III). The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 100g. The display unit of light emitting diode( LED) type. The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is also done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 1000kg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10* , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (222)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 299

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 159.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बमाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सूटाल पॉलीप्रो . लि. , सं. 52, स्टेर्लिंग रोड, नुनगाम्बकम, चैनेई-600034 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यूएस जे" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सूयल " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 382 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येतुलन युक्ति हैजिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यक्कलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है;

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंदी की जाती है।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन वाले ऐसे तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है और जिनका विनिर्माण उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससेअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, और जिनके सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( एन ) की संख्या 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्राम तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में है और 100 मि. ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 की रेंज में है तथा जिनका " ई " मान 1 ×10 , 2 x 10 या 5 × 10 , हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक है या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 256)/2002 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2003

S.O. 159.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMea- sures( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self indicating , non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SWS - J " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class II ) and with brand name " SUITALL " (herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Suitall Polypro Limited, No. 52, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai -600034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/382;

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain guage type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 300g and minimum capacity of 200mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 5- Hz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section (12) of Section 36, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accu- racy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg or with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (256)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4 , 1925

301

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 160.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्टैण्डर्ड मीटर मैनुफैक्चरिंग कं. , 102/ए, हादप्सर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, हादप्सर, पुणे 411013 द्वारा विनिर्मित ' ई-002/02 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित ( टैक्सी मीटर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्टैण्डर्ड " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/342 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त अनाचार के लिए उपकरण को पल्स जनरेटर, केबल और किराया मीटर को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी की जाएगी ।

उक्तमॉडल एक टैक्सी किराया मीटर है जिसमें दूरी और समय मापक युक्ति सहित अंकक सूचन समाविष्ट है । यह निरंतर योग करता है तथा यात्रा के किसी क्षण में किराया और यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार उपदर्शित करता है । संदेय किराया कतिपय गति से ऊपर तय की गई दूरी और अनुबंधित यात्रा के दौरान उस गति से नीचे लगे समय का फलनक है । मीटर का पठन सात खंडीय प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) द्वारा उपदर्शित किया जाता है और विद्युत प्रदाय डी सी 26 वोल्ट है । मीटर का ' के' कारक 1400 स्पंद दर है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 152 ) /2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

302

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2003

S.O. 160. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMea- sures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a Taxi Meter with digital indication of E -002/02 series with brand name " STANDARD " (herein referred to as the said model ), manufac- tured by M/ s . Standard Meter Manufacturing Company, 102/A, Hadapsar Industrial Estate , Hadapsar, Pune-411013 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003 /342;

In addition to stamping plate, the sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the pulse generator, cable and the fare meter for malpractice .

The said Model is a Taxi Meter with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring device . It totalizes continuously and indicates at any moment of the journey, the charges payable by the passenger. The fare to pay is a function of the distance travelled above a certain specified speed and the time elapsed below the specified speed during the journey. The reading of the meter is indicated by seven segment Light Emitting Diode (LED) and power supply is DC 8V-26V. The ' K' factor is 1400 pulse/kilometre.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 152)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/ माष 4, 1925

303

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 161.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्वात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स विल्सन वेट कं. , शिवाजी नगर, सावर कुण्डला, गुजरात-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउन्टर मशीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विल्सन वेट कं. " है (जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2003/ 391 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक काउन्टर मशीन ( यांत्रिकी ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 167 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 304

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/ MAGHA 4, 1925

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 161.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of counter machine with brand name "Willson Weight Co " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Wilson Weight Co , Shivaji Nagar, Savarkundla , Gujarat - 364515 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/391 ;

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a counter Machine (Mechanical ) with a maximum capacity of 10kg.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500 g to 50 kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design, accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (167)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 305

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4 , 1925

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का०आ० 162.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, नीदरलैण्डस मीट इनस्टिटुअट ( एन एम आई ) नीदरलैण्डस द्वारा जारी किए गए मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र सहित विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधोंके अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्तसेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्समाइक्रो मोशन इंक, 7070 विन्चेस्टर सर्किल , बोल्डर सी ओ 60301 द्वारा विनिर्मित और मै . फिशर रोजमाउन्ट ( इण्डिया ) प्रा. लि. माडर्न मिल्स कम्पाउण्ड, डी विंग, द्वितीय तल, साणे गुरू जी मार्ग , जैकब सर्किल, महालक्ष्मी, मंबई -400011 द्वार किसी परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के बिना भारत में बेचा गया ट्रांसमीटर 2700 श्रृंखला वाले सी एन जी 050 ब्राण्ड नाम के दाबाधीन संपीडित प्राकृतिक गैस के लिए इलैक्ट्रानिक ट्रांसमीटर बाले कारिओलिस द्रव्यमान प्रवाह मीटर के माडल का, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र प्रकाशित करती है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/ 2003/125 समनुदेशित किया गया है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) द्रवित पाकृतिक गैस ( एल पी जी ) को मापने के लिए कारिओलिस फ्लो मीटर है । इसमें ऐसा कोई समायोजनीय संघटक नहीं जिसमें सुरक्षा मुद्रा के उपयोग की अपेक्षा की जाती है । द्रव्यमान प्रवाह ट्रांसमीटर मॉडल 2700 में एक वैकल्पिक 16 अक्षर, दो पंक्तिद्रव क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श है । वैकल्पिक स्विच द्वारा सक्रियित दो प्रचालन बटन प्रदर्श के नीचे अवस्थित हैं ।

अंशाकन और विन्यास संसूचक धारित हस्त उपयोग के माध्यम से या विनिर्माता द्वारा प्रदान किए गए प्रो लिंग-2 साफ्टवेयर को चलाने वाले निजी कम्प्यूटर के उपयोग द्वारा भी पूरा किया जा सकेगा।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 270 )/ 2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 G1/044 306

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 162. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority along with the Model approval certificate issued by the Netherlands Meetinstituut (NMI) , Netherlands, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub - section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the Coriolis Flow Meter with electronic transmitter for compressed natural gas under pressure (CNG Flow meter) of CNG 050 brand name with transmitter 2700 series manufacturedby Micro Motion Inc 7070 Winchester Circle, Boulder, CO 80301 , and sold in India without any alteration or additions by M/ s Fisher Rosemount (India ) Pvt . Ltd. , Modern Mills Compound, D Wing, 2nd Floor, Sane Guruji Marg, Jacob Circle , Mahalaxmi , Mumbai- 400011 , and which is as- signed the approval mark IND/ 13/2002/ 125 ;

The said Model (see the figure given) is a Coriolis Flow meter for measuring Liquefied Natural Gas (LPG) . It has no adjustable components that require the use of a security seal . The mass flow transmitter Model 2700 has an optional 16 character , two line liquid crystal display, Two operation buttons activated by an optical switch are located below the display. Calibration and configuration may also be accomplished through the use of the hand held communicator or by the use of a personal computer running the Pro Link II software provided by the Manufacturer.

[F. No. WM -21 (270)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 307

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का०आ० 163.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, नीदरलैण्डस मीट इनस्टिटुअट ( एन एम आई ) नीदरलैण्डस द्वारा जारी किए गए मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र सहित विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रो मोशन, ग्रोइनेवलडसेलन , 63903 , ए जेड वी नेन डल , नीदरलैण्डस द्वारा विनिर्मित और मै . फिशर रोजमाउन्ट ( इण्डिया ) प्रा. लि. माडर्न मिल्स कम्पाउण्ड, डी विंग, द्वितीय तल, साणे गुरू जी मार्ग , जैकब सर्किल, महालक्ष्मी, मुंबई- 400011 द्वारा किसी परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के बिना भारत में बेचा गया द्रव्य और गैस के लिए श्रृंखला 700,1700 और 2700 के इलैक्ट्रानिक ट्रांसमीटरों वाले कारिओलिस द्रव्यमान प्रवाह मीटर के माहल सी एम एफ -050,100,200,300 और 400 का, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/2003/124 समनुदेशित किया गया है।

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) द्रव और गैस मापने के लिए कारिआलिस फ्लो मीटर है । मॉडल की प्रवाह रेंज नीचे सारणी में उल्लिखितहै:-

मॉडल

मात्रा न्यूनतम (कि. ग्रा. /घण्टा) मात्रान्यूनतम (कि. ग्रा. /घण्टा)

60 × वास्तविक घनत्व ( कि. ग्रा./घण्टा)

सी एम एफ 050

175 × वास्तविक घनत्व (कि. ग्रा./घण्टा)

सीएम एफ 100

200

425 × वास्तविक घनत्व ( कि. ग्रा. /घण्टा)

सीएम एफ200

500

1175 × वास्तविक घनत्व ( कि. ग्रा./घण्टा)

सीएम एफ 300

9000

3150 × वास्तविक घमत्व ( कि. ग्रा./घण्टा)

सीएम एफ400

प्रत्येक गैसीय माध्यम 4 कि. ग्रा. /एम.' के न्यूनतम घनत्व के साथ प्रस्तुत किया जाएगा । ( अति क्रान्तिक ) एथिलीन की 450 कि. ग्रा. /एम' तक के घनत्व के साथ प्रस्तुत किया जा सकेगा ।

अभिरक्षा अन्तरण पद्धति में मॉडल 1700 या 2700 सेट करने के पश्चात् सेवा पत्तन तक पहुंच पैरामीटरों के अप्राधिकृत परिवर्तन से बचने के लिए सीलबन्द की जाएगी ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 (270 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ⅱ) ] New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 163. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, along with the Model approval certificate issued by the Netherlands Meetinstitutuut (NMI) , Netherlands , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Ap- proval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub- section (3 ) and sub-section (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the Coriolis Mass Flow Meter with electronic transmitter for gas and liquids with CMF-050,100,200,300 and 400 sensors and transmitters of series 700, 1700 and 2700 for liquids and gas manufactured by Micro Motion, Groeneveldselaan 6,3903 ; AZ Veenendaal , the Netherlands and sold in India without any alteration or additions by M/s . Fisher Rosemount (India) Pvt. Ltd, Modern Mills compound , D Wing , 2nd Floor, Sane Guruji Marg , Jacob Circle, Mahalaxmi , Mumbai- 400 011 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 / 2002/ 124 ;

The said Model (See the figure given ) is a coriolis Flow meter for measuring liquid and gas. The flow range of the models is stated in the table below ;

Model

Qmin (kg/h)

CMF 050

60 x actual density (kg/h)

CMF 100

175 x actual density (kg/h)

CMF 200

200

425 x actual density (kg/h )

CMF 300

1175 x actual density (kg/h )

500

CMF 400

9000

3150 x actual density (kg/h )

Every gaseous medium may be submitted with a minimum density of 4kg/m³ Also (super critical ) ethylene may be submitted with a density up to 450 kg/m³

After setting the Model 1700 or 2700 in Custody Transfer mode, the access to the service port shall be sealed to avoid unauthorized changing of parameters .

[F. No. WM- 21 (270)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 309

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 164.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 (1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स स्टैण्डस स्केल्स इंडस्ट्रीज, बी-17/डी/बी, गली सं. 9 - आनंद पर्वत इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , नई दिल्ली -110005 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउन्टर मशीन के माडल जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रिंस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /468 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक काउन्टर मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 25 ) /2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 164.-- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a counter machine with brand name " PRINCE " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Standards Scales Industries, B- 17/D/B, Street No. 9, Anand Parbat Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110005 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/468 ;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is a counter machine its maximum capacity of 10kg .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g. to 50kg. manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 25)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 311 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 165.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स स्टैण्डर्डस स्केल्स इंडस्ट्रीज , बी-17/डी/ बी, गली सं. १ , आनंद पर्वत इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, नई दिल्ली -110005 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यर्थाथता वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पी एल -01 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, सदृश सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन-प्रो वेट प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रिंस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/469 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त माडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक यांत्रिक स्टील यार्ड प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. सहित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रो वेट प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिकके " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. और 1000 कि. ग्रा. के बीच की रेंज की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (25 ) /2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 165. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic (Platform machine-Pro Weight type) weighing instrument with analogue indication of "PL01 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " PRINCE " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Standards Scales Industries, B- 17/ D/B, Street No. 9, Anand Parbat Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110005 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 469;

The said model is a mechanical steelyard type liver based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine - Pro Weight type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Secton 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (25 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 313

भारत काराजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 166.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स नवल किशोर राम किशोर एंड कं. , ए-31/37 - सी, नेता जी गली सं. 3 , मौजपुर, शहदरा , दिल्ली-110053 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउन्टर मशीन के मांडल, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मोइको " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गयाहै ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/2003/466 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमाडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक काउन्टर मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ठक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि सबत माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 27) /2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 G1/04-5 314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ji) ] New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 166. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformitywith the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a counter machine with brand name " MICO " (herein referred to as the Model ), manufactured byM/s Naval Kishor Raut Kishor & Co., A-31/37-C, Notaji of the Model of a counter chine Gali No. 3 , Maujpur, Shahadara, Delhi - 110053 and which is assigned the approval male 109/2003/466

The said Model (below figure given) is a counter machine . Its maximum iliadity of 10kg.

Further, in exercise of the pewers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design, accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured:

[P. No: WM-21 (27)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 315 [()]

भारत का राजपत्र जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

167.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉसी का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्णक रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अंतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त समान प्रकरते हुए, मैसर्स नवल किशोर राम किशोर एंड कं. ए-31 /37 - सी नेता जी गली सं० 3 , मौजपुर, शाहदरा , दिल्ली -110053 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, इलेक्ट्रानिक सदृश सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन- प्रो वेट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मांइको " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/2003/467 संमनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक यांत्रिक स्टील यार्ड प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा.और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2कि. ग्रा. सहित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन 5 प्रो वेट प्रकार ) तोलम उपकरण है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक् हार के लिएनजीओलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी की गई है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है, उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा .या उससे अधिक के "ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. और 1000 कि. ग्राम. के बीच की रेंज की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[पम.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (27)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, दक्ष चिक्षिक माप विज्ञान 316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii))

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 167. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non-automatic) Platform machine- Pro Weight type) weighing instrument with analogue indication of " PPF/NR-001 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ), and with brand name " MICO " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Naval Kishor Ram Kishor and Co. , A-31/37 -C, Netaji Gali No. 3 , Maujpur, Shahadara, Delhi - 110053 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/467;

The said model a is mechanical steelyard type liver based non - automatic wighing instrument (Platform machine -Pro Weight type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg and minimum capacity of2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g .

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section of the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacity ranging between 50kg and 1000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (27)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 317 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 168.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माष मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माय मानक ( मॉकों काअनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाएं रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स काल मार्केटिंग , 4 नर नारायण सेन्टर, जगदीश इस्टेट, निकोल रोड, लीला नगर, ठक्कर नगर अप्रोच, अहमदाबाद -382350 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " जी. पी. - 30 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्रिस्टल स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/2003/ 326 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है, तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम ठपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा.से 2 ग्राम तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज मेंसत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 10 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में साथापत मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं । जिसमें, के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (344)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24 , 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II See 3( ii)]

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2004

S.O. 168.--Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the pancribed the authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given bolow) is in como provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 and the Standards of Wal Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over piltolf of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issue and publishes the certinente of approvill of the Model of the self-indicating non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "OP -30 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) , and with brand name " CRYSTAL SCALE " (hereinafter referred to as the Model ), manufactured by M/s . Cal Marketing, 4 , Nar Naryan Centre, Jagadish Estate, Nikol Road, Lila Nagar, Thakkarnagar approach, Ahmedabad- 382350 Gujarat and which is assigned the approal mark IND/09/2003/326;

The said Model (See the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (c) value is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply ",

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. and with number of veri- fication scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value 100 mg to 2g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 10g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5× 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (344)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, LegalMetrology 319 भारत का सजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/ मान 4, 1925

भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 2 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 169.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वाराद्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत विरिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के परचार का समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्षित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें जार और नाम इवाक अधिनियम , 1996 ( 4976 ना ) आप तथा का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और कहा की संभावना है कि लगातार आधे भी अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल प्रमार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्मितियों में सेवा करता रहेगा,

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकारसरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 2 ) और उपधारा ( १ ) द्वारा प्रतियों का प्रयोग करते हुएहुए मैसर्स काल मार्केटिंग, गर अध्ण सेन्टर, जगदीश इस्टेट, निकोल, पेरु,, लौता नगरकर पर अड़ोष अहमदाबाद-382350 द्वारा विनिर्भिद्र मध्यम तर्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग ३ ) वाले " जी.पी. - 60/ 120 मुखला के स्वतः साफ अस्वालिङ अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकउपकरण ( दोहरी रेंज प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, किसके ब्रांड का जान " क्रिस्टल स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमीयन विहून आई एन डी/09/2003/327 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल पर आधारित ( दोहरी रेंज ) अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्राम मेशिन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मायमान अन्तराल ( ई) का मान 60 कि. ग्रा. तक 10 ग्रा. तथा 60 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 120 किया. पछि प्रा. है । एक आयतुलन मुक्धि है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलात्मक धारित आधेमतुलन अभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्बिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की कार नौर केन्द्रीय सरकार ठमध अधिनियम की भात ॐ की उपमा ( 12 ) हैं । प्रदत रास्तिनी भी मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी निमिति।उसी निनिर्माता द्वारा उशी सिद्धान्त विमादत के वैसे ही मैफ, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तौलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 प्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई ' में सत्यापन नाम अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 10 कि, प्राम से अधिक और 300 कि.ग्रा. ती अधिक्षमता वाले हैं और " " अधिक के ईमान के लिए 500 से 10,000 1 × 10, 2 × 10 चा 5x10 है जिसमें ' के ' का ऋणাংলা सूम के समतुल्य है।

[ एम.21 ( 344 ) /2001 ] 320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2004

S.O. 169.-- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic (Platform -dual range type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GP-60/ 120" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class III) , and with brand name " CRYSTAL SCALE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s . Cal Marketing , 4, Nar Narayan Centre, Jagadish Estate , Nikol Road, Lila Nagar , Thakkarnagar approach , Ahmedabad - 382350- Gujarat and which is assigned the approal mark IND /09/2003/327;

The said model ( See the figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based type (dual range) weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120 kg. and minimum capacity of 200g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10g. upto 60 kg . and 20g above 60kg. and upto 120kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing: In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and upto 300 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (344)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 321

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24 , 2004/माष 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 170.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करतां रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स क्राउन डिजिटल इन 1 , अवतार कालोनी प्रथम तल, गुप्ता फैशनर्स, मेन कुंजपुरा रोड़, करनाल -132001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " सी आर पी एस " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्राउन " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/350 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( दी आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमाची का भारसेल आधारित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्याकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील मुहर बन्दी कीजाएगी ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिसमें अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतरल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम से 300 कि. ग्रा. के रेंज तक की अनिऋतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें ' के ' घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 112 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 G1/04-6 322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2004

S.O. 170.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self indicating, non -automatic (Plat form type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CRPS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) , and with brand name " CROWN" (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Crown digital Inc. , 1 , Avtar Colony, 1st Floor, Gupta Fashioners , Main Kunjupura Road, Kami - 13200land which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/350.

The said Model (See the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 50 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode display indicates the weighting result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing: In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall be dome to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent pratices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging 50 kg.and upto 300 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 112 )/2001 ]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 323

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 171.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित्त प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के परवाह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्षित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मागक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की समाधि में भी उपलमा सरकार रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदक्ष शक्तिम्बों का प्रभोग करते हुए मैसर्स क्राउन डिजिटल इन 1 , अवतार कालोनी , प्रथम तल, गुप्ता फैशनर्स, मेन कुंजपुरा रोड़ , करनाल -132001 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 2 ) वाले " सी आर आर एस " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण (टैक्साय प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्राउन " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया हैं ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिड्न आई एनडी/ 09/2003/354 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी भारसेल आधारित प्रकारका उपाएकी अधिकाम क्षमता 24 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आभेपपुलन पुक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम ठपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी कीजाएगी ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 ग्रा.से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उस से अधिक के " ई " माम के लिए 5000 से 58,000 तक रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मांग 1 x 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 112)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2004

S.O. 171.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non -automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CRRS " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II ) and with brand name " CROWN " (herein referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s. Crown digital Inc, 1 Avtar colony, 1st Floor, Gupta Fashioners , Main Kunjupura Road , Karnal- 132001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/351;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 24 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtrative retained tare effect . The Light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing: In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices ,

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg.and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5× 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 112)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 325 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

नईदिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 172.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ऐस पैक मशीन्स, साइट सं. - 55 , श्री लक्षमी नगर, नावा इंडिया रोड, हिन्दुस्तान कोलेजम के सामने, साओरी पलायम पी ओ, कोयमबटूर- 641028 ( तमिलनाडु ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " एस - ए जी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( ओजे फिलर प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ऐस पैक " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /421 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल (दी आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचलित भरण मशीन ( ओजे फिलर ) है । और इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । इसे मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पाद, जैसे टूथ पाउडर, टॉलकम पाउडर, चाय, कॉफी पाउडर, गेहूं का आटा, पिसे मसाले, रसायन इत्यादि के भरण के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है । यह 20-60 पैकट प्रति मिनट, भरण करता है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बन्दी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत , उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 2 ग्रा. से 1000 ग्रा. तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 258 )/2002 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SBC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2004

S.O. 172 .-- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self- indicating, Automatic filling machine ( Auger Filler) of " ACE - AG " series with brand name " ACEPK" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. ACE Pack Machines , Site No. 55, Sri Laxmi Nagar, Nava India Road, Opp. Hindustan Collegem, Sowripalayam P.O. Coimbatore -641028 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/421;

The said model (See the figure given below) is an automatic filling machine (Auger Filler) and its maximum capacity is 200g . It is used for filling the free flowing products like tooth powder, talcum powder, tea, coffee powder, wheat flour, ground spices , chemicals etc. It fills 20-60 packets per minutes . The instruments operates on 440 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply ;

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of machine for fraudulent partices.

[F. No. WM-21 (258)/2002]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24 , 2004/माघ 4, 1925

327

नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 173.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ऐस पैक मशीन्स, साइट सं. - 55, श्री लक्ष्मी नगर, नावा इंडिया रोड, हिन्दुस्तान कोलेजम के सामने, साओरी पलायम पी ओ, कोयमुबटूर-641028 (तमिलनाडु ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " ऐस- सी पी" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( कप फिलर प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ऐस पैक" है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/422 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन (ओ फिलर ) और इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । इसे मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पाद, जैसे टूथ पाउडर, टॉलकम पाउडर, चाय, कॉफी पाउडर, चीनी नमक, कणिकाएं, डिटेरजेन्ट, बीज, कृषि उत्पाद इत्यादि के भरण के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है । यह 20-60 पैकट प्रति मिनट, भरण करता है । उपकरण 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 2 ग्रा.से 1000 ग्रा. तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 258 )/2002] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4 , 1925

328

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2004

S.O. 173. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self- indicating , Automatic filling machine ( Cup Filler ) of " ACE -CP " series with brand name " ACEPAK " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Ace Pack Machines , Site No. 55 , Sri Laxmi Nagar, Nava India Road, Opp . Hindustan Collegem, Sowripaolayam P.O. , Coimbatore -641028, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/422;

The said model (See the figure given below) is an automatic filling machine ( Cup Filler) and its maximum capacity is 200g. It is used for filling the free flowing products like tooth powder, talcum powder, tea, coffee powder, sugar , rice , salt , granuales , detergents , seeds , agricultural products etc. It fills 20-60 packets per minutes . The instrument operates on 440 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply;

In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F. No. WM-21 (258 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 329 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 174.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीनस पैकेजिंग मशीन्स प्रा. लि. , 1 , 2 , 3, 4 प्रभात इन्डस्ट्रीज एस्टेट , पी ओ मीरा थाना जिला-401104 द्वारा विनिर्मित " पी वी 50 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित मॉडल का काउन्टर मशीन के मॉडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वीनस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09 / 2003/449 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

सीलबन्दी: सील बन्द करने वाला बिन्दु स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के निकट पैनल बोर्ड के पिछली और दिया गया है कपटपूर्ण उपयोग को रोकने के लिए समुचित प्लेट पर अतिरिक्त सील बन्दी की जाती है ।

मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचलित भरण मशीन है । यह द्वार पाइप वाल्व प्रणाली के सिद्धान्त पर कार्य करती है । 200 मि.ली. से 5 लीटर के बीच रेंज या इसके समतुल्य भार को परिदत्त करने के लिए मशीन को समायोजित किया जा सकता है । यह 25 से 75 बोतल प्रतिमिनट (अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन मुक्त प्रवाह उत्पादों जैसे जल आदि को भरने के लिए अभिकल्पित की गई है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 277 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 GI/04-7 330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 174. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of te Automatic filling machine of " PV- 50 " series with brand name " VENUS " (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Venus Packaging Machines Pvt . Ltd. , 1 , 2, 3, 4, Bharat Industrial Estate , P. O. Mira Thana Distt . -401 104 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /449;

Sealing : Sealing point is provided on the back side of the panel board near stamping plate . To avoid fraudulent use and additional sealing is done at the appropriate plate.

The model (See the figure given above ) is an automatic filling machine . It works on the principle of vent pipe valve system . The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 200ml to 5 litre or equivalent weight . It can fill 25 to 75 bottled per minute ( maximum) the machine is designed to fill free flowing products such as water etc. It operates on 440 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

[F. No. WM- 21 (277)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 331

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 175.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रियोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्वात्, यह समाधान हो गया हैकिउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और मापं मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा गाय मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है औ इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी ठक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार सक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त सर्षितयों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वीनस पैकेजिंग मशीन्स प्रा. लि. , 1,2,3,4 प्रभात इन्डस्ट्रीज एस्टेट पी ओ मीरा थाना जिला -401104 द्वारा विनिर्मित " पाली फिल" श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( इलेक्ट्रानिक सभयों नियंत्रक आधारित ) मॉडल का काउन्टर मशीन के मॉडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वीमस " है (जिसे इसमें उबत मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003/450 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

सीलबन्दी स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के पास पैनल बोर्ड के पीछे की तरफ सीलिंग बिन्दु की व्यवस्था है । कपटपूर्ण प्रयोग से बचने के लिए समुचित प्लेट पर अतिरिक्त सील बन्दी की गई है ।

यह मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित भरण मर्जीन है । यह इलेक्यूनिक समय नियंत्रक आधारित प्रणाली के सिद्धान्तपर कार्य करती है । मशीन को 3 लीटर से 20 लीटर तक या समतुल्य भार के बीच किसी रेंज को परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित किया जा सकता है । यह 120 जार प्रति घंटा ( अधिकतम ) का भरण कर सकती है । मशीन को मुक्त प्रवाह उत्पाद जैसे जल इत्यादि को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । यह 440 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 (277 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 175.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of the Automatic filling machine (Electronic timer based) of " POLY FILL" series with brand name " VENUS " (hereinreferred to as the Model ), manufactured by M / s . Venus Packaging Machines Pvt . Ltd. , 1,2,3 ; 4, Bharat Industrial Estte , P. O. Mira Thana Distt. -401 104 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /2003 /450;

Sealing : Sealing point is provided on the back side of the panel board near stamping plate , to avoid fraudulent use and additional sealing is done at the appropriate plate .

The model ( See the figure given above ) is an automatic filling machine. It works on the principle electronic timer based system. The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 3 litre to 20 liter or equivalent weight . It can fill 120 jars per hour ( maximum) the machine is designed to fill free flowing products such as water etc. It operates on 440 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply;

[F. No. WM-21(277)/2001 ]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

333

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 176.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वी. एम. इंडस्ट्रीस , महुआ रोड, एस टी स्टेंड के निकट, सावरकुण्डला -364515 ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित यांत्रिक काउंटर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " वी एम इंडस्ट्रीस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 193 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र प्रकाशित करती है ;

यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक काउंटर मशीन है । जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदनके इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के यांत्रिक काउंटर मशीन जो कि 500ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. के रेंज के बीच की है, भी होगी ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 197 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 176.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of mechanical counter machine (herein referred to as the said Model) , with brand name " V.M. Industries " manufactured by M/s . V.M. Industries Mahuva Road , Near S.T. Stand , Savarkundla - 364515 (Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/193 ;

The Model (See the figure) is a counter machine with maximum capacity of 10kg.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of the said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the mechanical counter machine of similar make, accuracy and performance within the range of 500g to 50kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been Inanufactured.;

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 197)/2001 ]

P.A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माभ 4, 1925

335

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 177.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्वात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाएं रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मारुति इन्स्ट्रूमेन्ट्स कम्पनी , 59/201 , आनंद नगर, श्यामल सर्किल के पास , सेटेलाइट, अहमदाबाद-58 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थतत (यथार्थता वर्ग-2 ) वाले " एम टी- ए-2200" श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मारुति " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/328 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी प्रकार का भारसेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका, शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोलट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए- भी सीलबंद कीजाएगी ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करती हुए यह भीषणा करती है कि उपत मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से. 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तका के रेंज में संत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल (एन) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या त्रऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 155 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 177. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non - automatic , (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication belonging of "MT- A 22000 " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class - II) and with brand name " MARUTI" (here referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s Maruti Instruments Company, 59/201 , Anand Nagar, Near Shyamal Circle , Satelite, Ahmedabad- 58 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/328 ;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 22kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of the said Section, 36 of the said act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with no of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10m, k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the approved said model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 155)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 337

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 178.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा काट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल बधार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मारुति इन्स्ट्रूमेन्ट्स कम्पनी , 59/201 , आनंद नगर, श्यामल सर्किल के पास, सेटेलाइट, अहमदाबाद -58 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " एम टी- डी 10 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मारुति " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003 /329 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी प्रकार का भारसेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है , तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोलट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद कीजाएगी।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की सं. और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल (एन) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 155 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 G1/04-8 338

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 178.--Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non- automatic , (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "MT -D10 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -II ) and with brand name " MARUTI " (herein referred to as said model) manufactured by M/s . Maruti Instruments Company, 59/201 , Anand Nagar , Near Shyamal Circle, Satelite, Ahmedau -58 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/329 ;

The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 10kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of the s section, 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg/ g to 2 and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 155)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director, Legal Metrology 339 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 179.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मारुति इन्स्ट्रूमेन्ट्स कम्पनी, 59/201 , आनंद नगर, श्यामल सर्किल के पास , सेटेलाइट, अहमदाबाद-58 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले " एम पी -डी 50 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मारुति " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/330 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी प्रकार का भारसेल आधारित अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । तोलन उपकरण है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता की रेंज वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 ×10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के के हैं जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 155 )/2001 ].

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 179. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non -automatic , (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MP -D 50 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " MARUTI " ( herein referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/s .Maruti Instruments Company, 59/201 , Anand Nagar, Near Shyamal Circle , Satelite , Ahmedabad- 58 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2003/330 ;

The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain guage load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 50kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Sealing In addition to sealing of stamping plate, sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of the Section 36 of the said act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging from 50 kg to 300kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value I × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 155)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director , Legal Metrology 341 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 180.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आइरन ब्युल्ड इंजीनियर्स एसोसिएटेड, 1-58 / 59, जी आई डी सी फेस- IV, विठ्ठल उद्योग नगर 388721 ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " आई बी" श्रृंखला की स्वचालित, तोलन मशीन ( मैकनिकल प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " आई बी ईए " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/407 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्प लगाने वाली प्लेट के पास पैनल बोर्ड के पीछे की ओर सील लगाने का स्थल दिया गया है । कपटपूर्ण उपयोग से बचने के लिए समुचित स्थान पर अतिरिक्त सीलबंद की जाती है ।

मॉडल (दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित वेइंग मशीन है । यह मानक भार सहित अतिशेष के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करती है । मशीन 10 कि.ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. के बीच किसी रेंज में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित की जा सकती है । मशीन चावल , कणिका वाली चीनी , मक्का, कुक्कट पालन/मेवेशी/जलीय खाद्य जैसे मुक्त प्रवाह उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन की गई है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (269 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 180. -Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the automatic, weighing machine (Mechanical type ) of ' IB ' series and with brand name " IBEA " ( herein referred to as model ) manufactured by M/s. Iron Build Engineers Associated , 1-58/59, G.I.D.C. , Phase IV, Vithal Udyog Nagar - 388 121 (Gujarat) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/407;

Sealing: Sealing point is provided on the back side of the panel board near stamping plate. To avoid fraudulent use and additional sealing is done at the appropriate plate .

TheModel ( see the figure given ) is an automatic weighing machine . It works on the principle of balancing with standard weights . The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 10kg. to 50kg . The machine is designed to fill free flowing products such as rice , granulated sugar, maize , poultry/ cattle/ aqua feeds products etc.

[F. No. WM-21 (269 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925.

343

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 181.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सिंघल पेंटस एंड हार्डवेयर स्टोर , ऑफ 26 , जी टी रोड, आजादपुर, दिल्ली -110033 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउंटर मशीन के मॉडल , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सूर्या " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /442 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र आरी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

यह मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक काउंटर मशीन है । इसकी अंधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन , शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के 50 ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 16)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 181.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a counter machine with brand name " Surya" ( herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/ s . Singhal Paints and Hardware Store, Off. 26, G.T. Road. Azadpur, Delhi - 110033 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/442;

The Model (see figure) is a counter machine. Its maximum capacity is 10kg .

BRA

SURYA

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50kg . manufactured by the same manuface in accordance with the same principles , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 16)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 345

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 182.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत. रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों' काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सिंघल पेंटस एंड हार्डवेयर स्टोर, आफ 26, जी टी रोड, आजादपुर, दिल्ली -110033 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यर्थाथता वर्ग ( यर्थाथता वर्ग III )... वाले " सूर्या " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, सदृश सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रो वे प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नामः " सूर्या" है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/443 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल अस्वचालित, ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन- प्रो वे प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा . है ।

है। स्टाम्पिग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंदी की जाती और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदम के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन शुद्धता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालच के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो. 5.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. और 1000 कि. ग्रा. के बीच की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता बाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं जो बनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक हैं या शून्य केसमतुल्य हैं । 1

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू, एम.- 21 ( 16 )/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 G1/ 04-9 346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 182. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic (platform machine- Pro Weight type ) weighing instrument with analogue indication of " SURYA" series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III) and with brand name " Surya" (herein referred to as said model ) manufactured by M/s . Singhal Paints & Hardware Store, Off. 26 , G.T. Road . Azadpur, Delhi - 110033 and which is assigned the proval mark IND/09/2003/443;

The said Model is a non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine-Pro Weight type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model. shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging between 50kg and 1000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design accuracy and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 16)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

347

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 183.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वास उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, यह समाधान ही गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉबलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल मथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शवितों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विम्कों लिमिटेड, इन्डियन मर्केन्टाइल चैम्बर रामजी भाई कमानी मार्ग, बेल्लार्ड एस्टेट, मुंबई -400038 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " विम्को एल एफ " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित , भरण मशीन ( आगर फिलर ) अंकक सूचन सहित तोलने उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम. "विम्को" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/344 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है । '

उक्त माडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित, भरण मशीन ' आगर फिलर ' है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसका टूथ पाउडर, टेलकाम पाउडर, चाय, काफी आदि जैसे मुक्त प्रवाही उत्पादों को भरने के लिए उपयोग किया जाता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील बन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील बंदी कीजाती है।

POWDER FILLING MAC LF

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 (159 )/2002]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 183.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self indicating , automatic , filling machine (Auger filler ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " WIMCO - LF " series and with brand name "WIMCO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) manufacturedby M/s Wimco Limited, Indian Mercantile Chamber , Ramji Bhai Kamani Marg, Ballard Estate , Mumbai-400038, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/344;

The said Model (See the figure given below) an automatic filling machine (Auger Filler) and its maximum capacity is 5kg. It is used for filling the free flowing products like toothpowder, talcum powder, tea , coffee etc. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternatae current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

POWDER FILLING M/ C LF

[F. No. WM-21 ( 159)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 349 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 184.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विमको लिमिटेड, इन्डियन मर्केन्टाइल चैम्बर रामजी भाई कमानी मार्ग, बेल्लाई एस्टेट, मुबई-400038 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " गैब " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, स्वचालित, भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विमको " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/343 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित, भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 280 ग्रा. या इसके समतुल्य परिणाम है । इसे तेल क्रीम, टूथपेस्ट, जेली, जैम , दही, घी, रोगन, डिस्टम्पर आदि जैसे विस्कस द्रव उत्पादों को भरने के लिए उपयोग किया जाता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंदी की जाती है।

SE FILLING MIC GAB

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन के प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत, उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 3 ग्रा. से 280 ग्रा. या समतुल्य परिमाण के रेंज में क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 159 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi, the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 184. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the self- indicating , Automatic , filling machine (Piston Filler ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GAB " series and with brand name " WIMCO " (herein after referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s Wimco Limited, Indian Mercantile Chamber , Ramji Bhai Kamani Marg , Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 40038 , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2003/343;

The said Model ( see the figure given below) an automatic filling machine (Piston Filller) and its maximum capacity is 280g. or equivalent volume. It is used for filling the viscous liquids products like oil , cream , toothpaste, jelly, jam, curds , ghee , paints , distempe etc. The instruments operates on 230 Volts, 50 hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices.

TUBE FILLING

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 3g to 280g. or equivalent volume manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 159)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

351 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष4, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी, 2004

का.आ. 185.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जयंथ स्केल, 7 , शिवाजी नगर, सावरकुण्डला, गुजरात-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउन्टर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जयंथ" है (जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 390 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) 10 कि. ग्रा. के अधिकतम क्षमता सहित एक काउन्टर मशीन ( यांत्रिक ) है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, शुद्धता, डिजाइन के अनुसार, और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के उसी मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 249) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 352

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 185.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a counter machine with brand name " Jayanth" ( herein referred to as the Model ) manufactured by M/s Jayanth Scale Co. , 7, Shivaji Nagar , Savarkundla -364515 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003/390 ;

The said Model ( see the figure given) is a counter machine . Its maximum capacity is 10 kg.

Faither, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximumcapacity in the range 500g . to 50kg . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (249)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 353

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का.आ. 186.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्पान पैक सिस्टम्स, शेड सं० 20, हरीचन्द कम्पाउन्ड, एल.बी.एस. मार्ग , विखरोली, ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई -400079 द्वारा विनिर्मित ( ग्रेषिमेटिक वेंईंग एण्ड फिलर ) " डब्ल्यू एफ-1000 कि.ग्रा." श्रृंखला के स्वचालित मशीन, ( ग्रेविमेटिक फिलर प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्पान पैक" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 376 समुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त माडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) अंकक सूचक से संबद्ध विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित एक स्वचालित तोलन और भरण मशीन (ग्रेविमेटिक भरण ) है । मशीन 5 कि. ग्रा. से 300 कि. ग्रा. के बीच किसी रेंज में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित की जा सकती है । यह 18 से 180 आधान प्रति घंटा/नोजल ( अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन फल जूस , दूध , तेल जैसे मुक्त प्रवाह तरल उत्पादों को ( एक या अधिक नोजल्स अधिकतम ) भरने के लिए डिजाइन की गई है । यह 440 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (28 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109Gl/04-10 354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 186. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ,

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the automatic weighing machie (gravimatic weighing and filler) of ' WF - 1000 kg ' series and with brand name " SPAN PACK" (Gravimatic filler type)" (herein referred to as said model) manufactured by M/s . Span Pack Systems, Shed No. 20, Harichand Compound , L.B.S. Marg , Vikhroli (W), Mumbai -400 079 and which is assigned the approval ma IND/09/2003/376;

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices .

The said Model ( figure given above ) is an automatic weighing and filling machine (gravimatic filler ) incorporated with strain gauge type of load cell connected to digital indicator. The Maching can be adjusted to deliver any range between 5 kg. to 300 kg. It can fill 18 to 180 containers per hour/ nozzle (Maximun). The machine is designed with one or More nozzles to fill free flowing liquid products such as fruit juices , Milk, pesticides , oil . It operates on 440 volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

[F. No. WM -21 (28)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 355

1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24/2

नई दिल्ली,

135

धान हो गया है कि उक्त माप मानक अधिनिधिनियम, का.आ. 187. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्वात्, यह समाधान हो रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट औरऔर माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 19761976 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोहित ) नियम, 1987 के अपनों केआता की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न प्ररिक्षिप्रतियों में लारवा रहेगा, अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( ४ ) हालत प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्पान पैक सिस्टम्स, शेड सं० 20, हरीचन्द कम्पाउन्ड, एल.बी.एस. मार्ग, विखरोली, ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई-400079 द्वारा विनिर्मित ( प्रविमेटिक वेंईंग एण्ड फितर ) " वी एफ -20 एल " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मलीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्पान पैक" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/375 समनुमेलित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र और प्रकाशित करती है;

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण ब्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद कीजाएगी ।

उक्त मॉडर्स (दी गई आकृति देखें एक स्वचालित स्कीन है । यह लगातार विस्थापन के बहु पिस्टन फिलिंग प्रक्रम के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करती है । मशीन 5 लिटर से 300 लीटर या सम्मुरूप भार के बीच किसी रेंज में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित की गई है यह 18 से 180 आधान प्रति घंटा/नोजल (अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन फल जूस , दूध, नाश जीवमार, तेल जैसे मुक्त प्रवाहप्रवाह उत्पादों को एक या अधिक नोजल्स को भरने के लिए डिजाइन की गई है । यह 440 बोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 28 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 356

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 24 , 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

NewDelhi, the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 187.--Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the automatic filling machine of 'VF - 20L' series and with brand name " SPAN PACK" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Span Pack Systems , Shed No. 20, Harichand Compound, L.B.S. Marg, Vikhroli (W) , Mumbai -400 079 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/375;

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent practices.

The said Model (figure given above ) is an automatic filling machine . It works on the principle of multi piston filling mechanism under constant displacement . The machine can be adjusted to delivery any range between 5 to 300 litre or equivalent weight . It can fill 18 to 180 containers per hour/nozzle (Maximum ) . The machine is designed with one or more nozzles to fill free flowing liquid products such as fruit juices , milk , pesticides , oil . It operated on 440 volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 28 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 357 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4 , 1925

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2004

का०आ० 188.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स स्पान पैक सिस्टम्स , शेड सं. 20 , हरीचन्द कम्पाउन्ड, एल. बी. एस. मार्ग, विखरोली, ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई -400079 द्वारा विनिर्मित ( ग्रेविमेटिक वेईंग एण्ड फिलर ) ' डब्ल्यू एफ-30 ' श्रृंखला के स्वचालित वेइंग मशीन ( ग्रेविमेटिक फिलर प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "स्पान पैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/374 समूनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिग प्लेट की सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी कीजाती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित वेइंग मशीन ( ग्रेविमेटिक फिलर ) है । जिसमें भार सेल के विकृतमापी प्रकार समाविष्ट मशीन 20 ग्रा. के माप अन्तराल सहित 500 ग्रा. से 30 कि.ग्राः के बीच किसी रेंज में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित की जा सकती है । यह 12 पाउच प्रति मिनट ( अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । मशीन बिस्कुट , दाल, आलू चिप्स, मसाले, चाय, चीनी , चावल, बीजों और मिष्ठान जैसे मुक्त प्रवाह उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन की गई है । यह 440 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करती है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (28 )/2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/ MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 188. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Mea- sures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the automatic weigh- ing machine (gravimatic weighing and filler) of ' WF - 30 ' series and with brand name " SPAN PACK " (Gravimatic filler type ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/ s . Span Pack Systems , Shed No. 20, Harichand Compound. 1.B.S. Marg . Vikhroli ( W) , Mumbai-400 079 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09/2003/374 Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fraudu- lent practices.

The said Model ( figure given above ) is an automatice weighing machine (gravimatic filler) incorporated with strain gauge type of load cell . The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 500g to 30kg with scale interval of 20g. It can fill 12 pouches per minute ( Maximum ) . The Machine is designed to fill free flowing products such as biscuits , pulses , potato chips , spices , tea , sugar , rice, seeds and confectionary . It operates on 440 voits , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

[F. No. WM-21(28)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 359

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग - खण्ड ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी, 2004

का०आ० 189.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स स्पान पैक सिस्टम्स, शेड सं. 20, हरीचन्द कम्पाउन्ड, एल . बी. एस. मार्ग , विखरोली, मुंबई-400079 ( पश्चिम ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " बी एफ-5 एल " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( पिस्टन फिलर प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्पान पैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/373 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट की सीलबंद करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी कीजाएगी ।

उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित ( पिस्टन फिलर ) भरण मशीन है । यह लगातार विस्थापन के अधीन पिस्टन फिलिंग प्रक्रम के सिद्धान्त पर कार्य करती है । मश्न 100 मि.ली. से 5000 मि.ली. या समतुल्य भार के बीच किसी रेंज में परिदत्त करने के लिए समायोजित की जा सकती है । मह 10 पाउच प्रप्ति मिनट ( अधिकतम ) भर सकती है । यह 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । यह मुक्त प्रवाह उत्पादों के भरण के लिए उपयोग की जाती है । it at son toutertugas on

सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 28 ) / 2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 6th January, 2004

S.O. 189. Wheras the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Mea- sures(Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the automatic filling Machine ( Piston filler ) of ' VF - 5L ' series and with brand name " SPAN PACK" (piston filler type ) (hereinafter referredto as the said Model ) manufactured by M /s . Span Pack Systems, Shed No. 20, Harichand Compound, L.B.S. Marg , Vikhroli (W) , Mumbai -400 079 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09/2003/373;

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

The said Model ( figure given) is an automatic filling machine (piston filler). It works on the principle of piston filling mechanism under constant displacement . The machine can be adjusted to deliver any range between 100ml to 5000ml or equivalent weight . It can fill 10 pouches per minute ( Maximum) . It operates on 230 volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply . It is used for filling free flowing products .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 28 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 361

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारतीय मानकब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली 12 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 190.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संख्या

(2)

(1)

1. आईएस 371 : 1999

2. आईएस 1418 : 1999

3. आईएस 2294: 1986

4. आईएस 3095 : 1999

5. आईएस 3196 ( भाग 1 ) : 1992

6. आईएस 3196 ( भाग 2 ) : 1992

7. आईएस 3854 : 1997

8. आईएस 4699 : 1984

9. आईएस 6206 : 1985

10. आईएस 12300: 1988

11. आईएस 13229 : 1999

12. आईएस 13429 ( भाग 3 ) : 2000 13. आईएस 14370 : 1976

14. आईएस 14724: 1999

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

(4) (3)

06-10-2003 संशोधन सं. 3 जून, 2003

30-06-2003 संशोधन सं. 1 जून, 2003

31-05-2003 संशोधन सं. 2 मई, 2003

30-06-2003 संशोधन सं. 1 जून, 2003

19-09-2003 संशोधन सं . 3 अप्रैल, 2003

19-09-2003 संशोधन सं. 3 मई, 2003

06-10-2003 संशोधन सं. 3 जून , 2003

31-05-2003 संशोधन सं . 1 मई , 2003

31-05-2003 संशोधन सं. 2 मई, 2003

19-09-2003 संशोधन सं. 1 जून , 2003

31-05-2003 संशोधन सं. 2 मई, 2003

31-05-2003 संशोधन सं..1 मई, 2003

31-05-2003 संशोधन सं. 1 मई, 2003

03-12-2003 संशोधन सं. 1 जून, 2003

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. केप्रवि/13: 5 ]

एस. के. चौधरी, उप महानिदेशक (मुहर )

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 12th January , 2004

S.O. 190. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notified that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued.

109 G1/04-11 362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

No. and Year of the Indian Standards

Sl . No.

No. and Year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1 . IS 371 : 1999

06-10-2003

Amendment No. 3 June , 2003

2. IS 1418 : 1999

30-06-2003

Amendment No. 1 June , 2003

3. IS 2294: 1986

31-05-2003

Amendment No. 2 May , 2003

4. IS 3095 : 1999

Amendment No. I June , 2003

30-06-2003 5. IS 3196( Pt 1 ) : 1992

19-09-2003

Amendment No. 3 April , 2003

6. IS 3196 ( Pt 2) : 1992

19-09-2003

Amendment No. 3 May, 2003

7. IS 3854: 1997

06-10-2003

Amendment No. 3 June , 2003

8. IS 4699 : 1984

31-05-2003

Amendment No. 1 May, 2003

9. IS 6206 : 1985

31-05-2003

Amendment No. 2 May, 2003

10. IS 12300: 1988

19-09-2003

Amendment No. 1 June, 2003

11. IS 13229 : 1999

31-05-2003

Amendment No. 2 May, 2003

12 . IS 13429 ( Pt 3) : 2000

31-05-2003

Amendment No. I May , 2003

13. IS 14370 : 1976

31-05-2003

Amendment No. 1 May, 2003

14. IS 14724: 1999

03-12-2003

Amendment No. 1 June , 2003

Copy of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Calcutta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur . Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. CMD/13 : 5 ]

S. K. CHAUDHURY, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नईदिल्ली 12 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 191.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

लाइसेंस धारी का नाम व पता

भागअनु. वर्ष क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संरच्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

भामा संख्या

(1) ( 2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6). (7) (8) 1. 6374071

12269

87 2003-01-16

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट-विशिष्टि

मैसर्स लक्की पुल्वराइर्ज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड सर्वे नं. 353/ए चिमराला गाँव , नल्लाबनदगुडम

कोडड मण्डल , नलगौंडा

जिला ( आ. प्र. ) 508206 363

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(4)

(3)

(1) ( 2)

2. 6374172 2003-01-17 मैसर्स कुशाल पॉलीमर्स प्रा. लि. शेड नं. 18 , फेस 2 आई डी ए चेरलापलयज , आर आर जिला-500051 3. 6374273 2003-02-15 मैसर्स ऑसविन वुड पेनल्स प्रा. लि. नं. 19 -बी सिपकोट इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, गुम्भीडिपोंडि-601201 4. 6374374 2003-02-15 मैसर्स पिओनियर प्लास्टिक्स 2/127-एमेन रोड विजयमंगलम पेरून्दुरई ( टी के ) इरोड़-638056

5. 6374475 2003-02-18 मैसर्स एस. एस. इंटरप्राइसेज 81 , पिल्लइयरकोइल स्ट्रीट कीझ मनमबेडूगाँव वेल्लवेडूपोस्ट विरूवल्लूर जिला 602107 6. 6374576 2003-02-18 मैसर्स क्रिस्टी फ्राईडग्राम इंडस्ट्री बी-53 और बी-61 के एसएस आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट पिलागुम्बा गाँव हॉसकोट तालुक बंगलौर ग्रामीण जिला-562114 7. 6374677 2003-02-15 मैसर्स जय इंडस्ट्रीज, यूनिट II , 39 - ए एल. एम. एल. कालौनी पी. एन. पलायम, कोयम्बत्तर641037 8. 6374778 2003-02-20. मैसर्स एसएनआर फूडस प्रॉडक्टस 115/1 ए पिल्लईयर कोइल स्ट्रीट जाफरखानपेट, चेन्नई-600083

2003-02-15

9. 6374879

मैसर्स नीलकण्ठ सीमेंटस प्रा. लि. प्लॉट न . 12 ई ब्लॉक ऑटो नगर विशाखापटनम-530012

2003-02-19

10. 6374980

मैसर्स के. वी. आर. इंटरप्राइजिज नं. 4/275 कम्माकरपलायम गाँव वेलावेडू पूनमल्ली तालुक जिरूवल्लूर जिला-602107 6375075

11.

2003-02-24 मैसर्स नायडू एक्वा फार्म्स 114, नल्लूर गांव चोलावरम पोस्टपोन्नेरी तालुक तियवल्लूर जिला

(5)

(7 ) (8 )

(6)

13487

सिंचाई उपस्कर- सर्जक विशिष्टि

76 समुद्री उपयोग हेतु प्लाईवड 00710 (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

2000

04985

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए गैर- प्लास्टिकृत पीवीसी पाइप ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

07021

शिशुओं और स्कूल पूर्व बच्चों के लिए प्रोटीन बहुल पुरक खान पदार्थ

08034

निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट ( पहला-पुनरीक्षण)

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

08112

43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

( पहला पुनरीक्षण

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलामत विशिष्टि

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि 364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1) ( 2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7) ( 8) 12. 6375174 2003-02-24

14543

98 मैसर्स सेलंवम ड्रिंकिंग वॉटर एस नं. 183 थेरी रोड पुडुक्कोटई थूटुकुडि-628103

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

13. 6375275 2003-02-15

00710

समुद्री उपयोग हेतु प्लाईवुड (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स केनरा वुड एण्ड प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , जेप्पूपी. बी. नं. 566 मंगलौर-575002

14. 6375376 2003-02-15

02202 10

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतहयुक्त पल्ले

मैसर्स केनरा वुड एण्ड प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , जेप्पूपी. बी . नं. 566 मंगलौर-575002

15. 6375477

2003-02-15

04984

पेय जल आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्ववाले पोलिएथाइलीन पाइप (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स नेट प्लास्ट प्रॉडक्टस नं. 38/2, न्यू तिम्बेरूआर्ड लेआउट पहला मेन रोड क्रॉस बंगलौर -560026

16. 6375578

2003-02-26

09301

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबस्मे ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

मैसर्स कानन इंजीनियरिंग कारपोरेशन 2/164 , सालेम- बंगलौर बाईपास रोड थोल्लमपट्टी थाडागम गाँव धर्मपुरी -636705

17. 6375679 2003-02-25

00398 02

मैसर्स अल्विटस इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा. लि. , ए-10 अम्बात्तूर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट चेन्नई-600058

शिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक भाग 2 जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित एल्युमीनियम चालक (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )

18. 6375780

2003-02-25

00398 02

मैसर्स क्रीसेंट पॉवर कंडक्टर्स 138 सी. ई. ई. इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट पुराना महाबलीपुरम रोड पेंरूगुडि, चेन्नई -600096

शिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के 'चालक भाग 2 जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित एल्युमीनियम चालक (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

19. 6375881

08034

2003-02-15

(पहला पुनरीक्षण)

निमज्जनीय पम्पसेट

मैसर्स सुगना मशीन वर्क्स प्रा. लि. , 31, सिडको इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट सिडको कुरिची, कोयम्बत्तूर-641021

20. 6375982 2003-02-19

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स प्रसान्त इंटरप्राइजिज नं. 8 , तीसरा मेन रोड, मणिविलास गार्डन कामाक्षीपालया, बंगलौर -560079

21. 6376075 2003-02-25

14543

पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

मैसर्स सम्मस एक्वा 4/357 एन . मुथईयापुरम नडुनलुमूलीकिरानारी पी. औ. मेला तिरूचेनगोडू, पंचायत-628213 365

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3 )

(2)

(1)

2003-02-15

22. 6376176

मैसर्स शेरॉन प्लास्ट 4/676, पोरियनी मुंटूर पी ओ पालक्कड 678 592 23. 6376277 2003-02-25 मैसर्स हरविनके एक्वा इंडस्ट्री 50/2पुडूर पोस्ट इंरोड़ 638 002 24. 6376479 2003-02-15

(7) ( 8)

(४)

(5)

83 विद्युत संस्थापन के लिए कंडयूट 09537 04

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द मिनरल वॉटर (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टि

01364 01

मैसर्स सुन्दरम फास्टनर्स लिमिटेड

कृष्णापुरम अव्यूिर

मदुरई 626160

उत्पाद ग्रेड " ए " और " बी " के षटकोणीय शीर्ष काबले पेंच और ढिबरियां भाग 1 षटकोणीय शीर्ष काबले (साइज रेंज एम 1.6 से एम 64 तक) ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

[सं. सी एम डी-1 / 13 : 11 ] एस. के. चौधरी , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 12th January, 2004

S.O. 191.- In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule ;

SCHEDULE

Licence No.

Name & Address ofthe Party Sl. No.

Operative Date (year/Month)

2003-01-16

1. 6374071

M/s Lucky Pulverisers Private Limited Survey No. 353 /A Chimrala Viliage Nallabandagudam Kodad Mandal Nalgonda District (A. P . ) - 508 206.

2003-01-17

2. 6374172

M/s Kushal Polymers Pvt . Ltd. Shed No. 18 Phase II IDA, Cherlapallyge R. R. District -500 051 .

2003-02-15

3. 6374273

M/sOswinWood Panels Private Limited No. 19 - B Sipcot Industrial Estate Gummidipondi -601 201 .

2003-02-15

4. 6374374

M/sPioneer Plastics 2/127 - A Main Road Vijayamangalam Perundurai (TK) Erode-638 056

Year

IS No.

Title of the Standard

Part Sec.

87 Specification for 53 Grade 12269 Ordinary Portland Cement

13487

Irrigation Equipment- Emitters- Specification

00710

Specification for Marine Plywood (First Revision)

04985

Unplasticized PVC Pipes for potable water Supplies- Specification (Third Revision ) 366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1 2

8 5. 6374475

2003-02-18

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

M/s. S. S. Enterprises 81 , Pillajyar Koil Street Keezh Manambedu Village Vellavedu Post Tiruvallur District-602 107

6. 6374576

2003-02-18

07021

Specification for Protein Rich Food Supplements for Infants and Preschool Children

M/s. Christy Friedgram Industry B-53 and B -61 KSSIDC Industrial Estate Pillagumba Village Hoskote Taluk Bangalore RuralDistrict-562 114

7. 637-4677

2003-02-15

08034

Submersible Pumpsets (FirstRevision)

M/s . Jai Industries Unit II, 39-A L. M. L. Colony P. N. Palayam Coimbatore-641 037

8. 6374778

2003-02-20

14543

98 M/ s. SNR Food Products 115/ 1A, Pillaiyar Koil, Street Jafferkhanpet Chennai -600 083

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water )

9. 6374879

T 2003-02-15

08112

Specification for ordinary 43 Grade Portland Cement (First Revision )

M/s . Neelakanth Cements Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. 12 ' E' , Block Auto Nagar Visakhapatnam- 530 012

10. 6374980 2003-02-19

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other thanPackaged Natural Mineral Water)

M/s . K.V.R. Enterprises No.4/275 Kammavarpalayam VillageVellavedu Poonamallee Taluk Tiruvallur district- 602 107

11. 6375075 2003-02-24

14543

98 M/s . Naidu Aqua Farms 114, Nallur Village Cholavaram Post Ponneri Taluk Tiruvallur District

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

12. 6375174

2003-02-24

14543

M/s. Selvam Drinking Water S. No. 183 , Theri Road Puddukotai Thoothukudai - 628 103

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

13 . 6375275

2003-02-15

00710

Specification for Marine Plywood (FirstRevision)

M/ s . Kanara Wood and Plywood Industries Ltd. , Jeppu P. B. No. 566 , Mangalore- 575 002

14 . 6375376

2003-02-15

02202 0!

99 M/s. Kanara Wood and Plywood Industries Ltd. , Jeppu P. B. No. 566 , Mangalore - 575 002

Specification for Wooden Flush Door Shutters(Solid Core Type ) Part1-Plywood Face Panels (SixthRevision )

15. 6375477

2003-02-15

04984

Specification for High Density Polyethylene Pipesfor Potable Water Supplies (Fourth Revision )

M/ s. Net Plast Products No. 38/2, New Timberuard Layout , Ist Main Road, Avalahalli Mysore Road CrossBangalore-560 026 367 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

8 16. 6375578 2003-02-26

09301

Deepwell Hand Pumps- Specification (Third Revision)

M/ s. Kannan Engineering Corporation , 2/164, Salem- Bangalore Bye - Pass Road Thollampatti Thadagam VillageDharmapuri -636 705

17. 6375679 2003-02-25

00398

M/ s . Alvitts Electricals Pvt. Ltd. , A - 10 , Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai-600 058

Aluminium Conductors ForOverhead Trans- mission Purposes Part 2- Aluminium Conductors , Galvanized Steel Reinforced (Third Revision)

2003-02-25

18. 6375780

00398

96 M/ s. Crecent Power Conductor , 138 C , Ε.Ε. Industrial Estate Old , Mahabalipuram Road, Perungudi , Chennai - 600 096 Galvanized Street Rein- Aluminium Conductors For Overhead Trans- mission Purposes Part 2- Aluminium Conductors forced (Third Revision)

19. 6375881 2003-02-15

08034

(FirstRevision) Surmersible Pumpsets

M/s. Suguna Machine Works Pvt. Ltd. , 31 , Sidco Industrial Estate Sidco , Kurichi Coimbatore-641 021

20. 6375982 2003-02-19

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

M/s. Prasanth Enterprises No. 8 , 3rd Main Road, Manivilas Garden , Kamakshipalya , Bangalore -560 079

2003-02-25

21. 6376075

14543

Specification for Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

M/ s. Samms Aqua 4/357 , N. Muthaiyapuram , Nadunalumoolkinaree P.O. Mela Tiruchengodu Panchayat -628 213

2003-02-15

22. 6376176

09537 04

83 M/s . Sharon Plast 4/676 , Poriyani Mundur P.O. Palakkad-678 592

Installations Conducts For Electrical Part 3 : Rigid Plain Conducts of Insulating Materials

23. 6376277 2003-02-25

14543

98 M/s. Harvinkey Aqua Industry , 50/2 , Pudur L. Pudur Post Erode-638 002

Specification For Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

2003-02-15

24. 6376479

01364 01

83 M/s . Sundaram Fasteners Limited Krishnapuram Aviyur , Madurai - 626 160

Hexagaon Head Bolts Screws And Nuts of Pro- duct Grades A And B Part 1 -Head Bolts ( Size Range M16 to M64) Part2-Head Screws ( Size Range M1.6 to M64) Part 3 - Nuts ( M1.6 to M64) (Third Revision)

[No. CMD- 1/13 : 11 ]

S. K. CHAUDHARY, Dy . Director General (Marks) 368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

शहरी विकास और गरीबी उन्मूलन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 22 जनवरी, 2004

का. आ. 192.- मुद्रण निदेशालय , नई दिल्ली में मुद्रण निदेशक के केन्द्रीय सिविल सेवा ( वर्गीकरण , नियंत्रण और अपील) नियम, 1965 ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त नियम कहा गया है ) के अधीन मुद्रण निदेशालय और मुद्रण निदेशालय के नियंत्रणाधीन , भारत सरकार मुद्रणालय में कार्यरत कर्मचारियों के कतिपय प्रवर्ग के संबंध में अनुशासनिक प्राधिकारी और अपील प्राधिकारी की शक्तियां प्रदत्त की गई है,

और मुद्रण निदेशक का पद, पदधारी की अधिवर्षिता पर सेवानिवृत्ति के परिणामस्वरूप 1 अगस्त, 2003 को रिक्त हुआ है और कुछ अधिक समय के लिए रिक्त रहने की संभावना है;

और उक्त मुद्रणालय निदेशक द्वारा अब तक प्रयोग किए गए अनुशासनिक या अपील संबंधी कृत्यों के लिए वैकल्पिक व्यवस्था करने की अत्यंत आवश्यकता है ;

अतः . अब, राष्ट्रपति उक्त नियमों के नियम 12 के प नियम (2 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में, -

( क ) श्री पी.के. प्रधान, संयुक्त सचिव, शहरी विकास और गरीबी उन्मूलन मंत्रालय को उक्त नियमों के नियम 11 के खंड (v ) से ( ix ) तक में विनिर्दिष्ट शास्तियों में से किसी को अधिरोपित करने के लिए और उक्त नियमों के अधीन मुद्रण निदेशक को प्रदत्त सभी अपीलीय शक्तियों का प्रयोग करने के लिए अनुशासनिक प्राधिकारी नियुक्तकरते हैं;

(ख) श्री बी.बी. सिंह , अपर निदेशक ( प्रशासन ) , मुद्रण निदेशालय , शहरी विकास और गरीबी उन्मूलन मंत्रालय, नई दिल्ली को उक्त मुद्रण निदेशक द्वारा नियुक्त किए गए कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त नियमों के नियम 13 के उप नियम (2 ) में यथापरिकल्पित उक्त नियमों के नियम 11 के खंड ( i ) से ( iv ) में विनिर्दिष्ट आस्तियों में से किसी शास्ति को अधिरोपित करने के लिए अनुशासनिक प्राधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करते हैं ।

[सं.सी -31011/2/ 2003 - एवी/मुद्र. ] नीरज कुमार, निदेशक ( यूडी एण्ड पी एस पी ) MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION

New Delhi , the 22nd January, 2004

S.O. 192.-Whereas , the Director of Printing in the Directorate of Printing , New Delhi has been conferred under

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] Central Civil Service ( Classification , Control and Appeal ) Rules, 1965 ( hereinafter referred to as the said rules ) with the powers of disciplinary authority and appellate authority inrespect of certain category of employees working in the Directorate of Printing and the Government of India Presses under the control of Directorate of Printing ;

And Whereas , the post of Director of Printing has fallen vacant on 1st August 2003 consequent on the retirement on superannuation of the incumbent and is likely to continue to be so vacant for some time more ;

And Whereas , there is urgent need to make alternate arrangement for disciplinary or appellate function hitherto exercised by the said Director of Printing ;

Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( b) of sub- rule (2) of rule 12 of said rules, the President hereby appoints,

(a) Shri P.K. Pradhan , Joint Secretary in the Ministry ofUrban Development and Poverty Alleviation as disciplinary authority to impose of the penalties specified in clauses ( v) to ( ix) of rule 11 of the said rules as well as to exercise all the appellate powers conferred on the Director of Printing under the said rules;

(b) Shri B.B. Singh , Additional Director (Administration ) , Directorate of Printing in the Ministry of Urban Developinent and Poverty Alleviation , New Delhi as disciplinary authority to impose any of the penalties specified in clauses ( i ) to ( iv) of rule 11 of the said rules as envisaged in sub - rule ( 2) of rule 13 of the said rules in respect of the employees appointed by the Said Director of Printing.

[No. C-31011/2/2003- AV/Ptg. ] NIRAJ KUMAR, Director ( UD& PSP)

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2003

का. आ. 193.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 7 ( क ) की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम कीदूसरी अनुसूची में उल्लिखित मामलों से संबंधित किसी भी औद्योगिक विवाद के न्याय-निर्णयन तथा उक्त अधिनियम के अन्तर्गत सौंपे जाने वाले अन्य कार्यों को निष्पादन करने के लिए एक श्रम न्यायालय का गठन करती है जिसका मुख्यालय गुवाहाटी में होगा और श्री हैदरअली हजारिका को 28 नवम्बर , 2003 ( पूर्वाह्न ) से श्रम न्यायालय, गुवाहाटी के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. ए-11016/04/2003 - सीएलएस -11 ] वाई ० पी ० सहगल , अवर सचिव 369 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग 11- खण्ड (ii) ]

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi, the 15th December , 2003

अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अजमेर के पंच्चाट को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को30-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[फा. सं. एल-40012/79/2002 - आई आर ( डीयू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2003 S.O. 193.-in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) and (2) of Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby constitutes a Labour Court with Headquarters at Guwahati for the adjudication of Industrial Disputes re- lating to any matter specified in the Second Schedule to the said Act and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to it under the said Act, and appoints Shri Haidor Ali Hazarika as Presiding Officer of that Court with effect from 28th November , 2003 (FN) .

[F. No. A- 11016/4/2003-CLS- II ] Y. P. SEHGAL, Under Secy.

S.O. 195. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Indus- trial Tribunal, Ajmer as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt . of Post and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 30- 12-2003 .

[F. No. L-40012/79/2002-IR (DU) ] नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2003

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

अनुबंध

श्रमन्यायालय एवं औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण, अजमेर ( राज. )

पीठासीन अधिकारी: अतुल कुमार जैन आरएचजेएस

प्रकरण सं. UTR 11/02

(केंद्र सरकार का रेफरेंस पत्र क्र. एल-40012/79/2002-आई आरडीयू)

का. आ. 194.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 7 ( क) की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार इसके द्वारा तीसरी अनुसूची में उल्लिखित किसी भी मामले से संबंधित औद्योगिक विवाद के न्याय- निर्णयन तथा उक्त अधिनियम के अन्तर्गत सौंपे जाने वाले अन्य कार्यों को निष्पादन करने के लिए एक औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण का गठन करती है, और हैदरअली हजारिका को 28 नवम्बर, 2003 ( पूर्वाह्न ) से इस न्यायाधिकरण पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

नई दिल्ली 5-9-2002

[फा. सं. ए-11016/04/2003- सीएलएस- II ] वाई ० पी० सहगल, अवर सचिव

महावीर प्रसाद पुत्र औंकारदास वैष्णव मौहल्ला आमेटा ग्राम पोस्ट व तहसील हुरड़ा जिला भीलवाड़ा

प्रार्थी New Delhi , the 15th December , 2003

बनाम

1. अधीक्षक, मुख्य डाकघर, भीलवाड़ा

2. निरीक्षक डाकघर, गुलाबपुरा जिला भीलवाड़ा (राज. ) अप्रार्थी

उपस्थित : श्री सत्यनारायण शर्मा, यूनियम प्रतिनिधि, प्रार्थी की ओरसे ।

S.O. 194. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 1 ) and (2) of Section 7 (A) of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the CentralGov- ernment hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal with Headquarters at Guwahati for the adjudication of Indús- trial Disputes relating to any matter specified in the Third Schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to it under the said Act , and appoints Shri Haidor Ali Hazarika as Presiding Officer of the Tri- bunal with effect from 28th November , 2003 (FN) .

श्री रतनलाल बालोटिया, विभागीय प्रतिनिधि, विपक्षीगण की ओर से ।

[F. No. A- 11016/4/2003 -CLS- II ]

अवार्ड शर्ते

Y. P. SEHGAL, Under Secy.

दिनांक: 9-12-2003

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2003

इस प्रकरण में केन्द्र सरकार से प्राप्त रेफरेंस ( श्रम विवाद ) इस प्रकार था कि क्या विपक्षीगण द्वारा प्रार्थी महावीर प्रसाद को ईडीडीए के पद से 16-6-01 को टर्मिनेट करना वैधानिक एवं उचित था ? यदि नहीं तो प्रार्थी किस अनुतोष का अधिकारी है ?

का. आ. 195.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकारडाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारो के बीच,

109G1/04-12 370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

उक्त रेफरेंस हमारी न्यायालय में 25-9-02 को प्राप्त हुआ था । प्रार्थी की ओर से स्टेटमेंट ऑफ क्लेम दि. 30-10-02 को पेश हुआ था। विपक्षी ने क्लेम का जवाब दि. 8-4-03 को पेश किया था । प्रार्थी ने इस प्रकरण में दि. 2-6-03, 9-7-03, 7-8-03, 18-9-03 , 24-10-03 तथा 8-12-03 आदि पेशियों पर या तो अपनी उपस्थित नहीं दी अथवा प्रकरण को जारी रखने में कोई रुचि नहीं दिखायी तथा साक्ष्य भी पेश नहीं की । दि. 8-12-03 को प्रार्थी श्रमिक पक्ष की शहादत हमें बंद करनी पड़ी और प्रार्थी ने शहादत पेश नहीं की थी । अतः विपक्षी ने भी प्रकरण में कोई शहादत पेश नहीं की है क्योंकि प्रकरण में विचारणीय बिंदु का सिद्धमार प्रार्थी पर था ।

प्रार्थी ने क्लेम में बताया था कि वह विपक्षी के यहां दि. 13-3-2000 से 16-6-2001 तक ईडीडीए के पद पर डाकघर हुरड़ा में तैनात रहा था । प्रार्थी का कहना है कि विपक्षी ने उसे धारा 25एफ आई.डी. एक्ट 1947 के प्रावधानों की अवहेल्ना करते हुए दि. 16-6-01 को सेवा से पृथक कर दिया था ।

विपक्षी का कहना है कि प्रार्थी को कभी भी ईडीडीए के पद पर नियुक्त नहींकिया गया था । विपक्षी का कहना है कि स्थाई ईडीडीए छोटू खां को गबन के आरोप में 16-10-2000 को ड्यूटी से हटा दिया गया था तथा 28-5-01 को उसे सेवा के डिसमिस कर दिया था उस दौरान कुछ दिनों तक प्रार्थी महावीर प्रसाद वैष्णव ने तथा कुछ दिनों तक प्रकाशचंद्र ने काम किया था तथा दि. 10-7-01 से स्थाई व्यक्ति जाकिर हुसैन ईडीडीए के पद पर कार्यरत है ।

विपक्षीगण का कहना है कि प्रार्थी महावीर प्रसाद वैष्णव ने केवल मात्र अस्थाई व्यवस्था के तहत दि. 17-10-2000 से 4-12-2000 तक , फिर 18-12-2000 से 31-12-2000 तक, 7-1-01 से 28-2-01 तक , फिर 1-3-01 से 3-3-01 तक, फिर 5-3-01 से 10-3-01 तक, 12-3-01 से 24-3-01 तक, 26-3-01 से 31-3-01 तक, 3-4-01 से 4-4-01 तक, 7-4-01 को तथा फिर 9-4-01 से 12-4-01 तक, 14-4-01 को तथा 16-4-01 से 21-4-01 तक, 23-4-01 से 28-4-01 तक, 30-4-01 को तथा फिर 10-5-01 से 15-6-01 तक कार्य किया था । इस प्रकार विपक्षी के मुताबिक प्रार्थी ने उनके यहां अस्थाई व्यवस्था के तहत एक वर्ष की अवधिमें अधिकतम 159 अक्षरे एक सौ उनसठ दिन मात्र कार्य किया था। विपक्षी का कहना है कि प्रार्थी किसी भी प्रकार से 25एफ आई.डी. एक्ट 1947 के प्रावधानों का लाभ पाने का अधिकारी नहीं था ।

विपक्षीगण के उक्त कथन को देखते हुए 240 दिवस कार्य किया जाना साबित करने का सिद्धभार प्रार्थी पर था । सिद्धभार किस पर रहेगा । इस संबंध में 1981 एलआईसी सुप्रीप कोर्ट 806 मोहनलाल /मैनेजमेंट ऑफ भारत इलेक्ट्रॉनिक्स एआईआर 2002 सुप्रीम कोर्ट 1147 रेंज फॉरेस्ट ऑफिसर/स्टेट ऑफ कर्नाटका उल्लेखनीय है । कोई कर्मचारी महीने में पच्चीस दिन लगातार कार्य करे तो उसके राजपत्रित अवकाश व रविवारीय अवकाश भी उसके कार्य दिवसों में

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] गिने जाते हैं । वर्तमान प्रकरण में प्रार्थी द्वारा राजपत्रित एवं रविवारीय अवकाशों को छोड़कर महीने के समस्त दिनों में विपक्षीगण के यहां कार्य किया जाना साबित नहीं है । अतः रविवारीय या राजपत्रित अवकाशों को इस प्रकरण में प्रार्थी के कार्यदिवसों की गणना में शामिल नहीं किया जासकता है ।

प्रार्थी ने अपना क्लेम साबित करने के लिए कोई गवाह या दस्तावेजी सबूत पेश नहीं किया है । यहां तक कि प्रार्थी स्वयं भी साक्षी कक्ष में उपस्थित नहीं हुआ है । उक्त हालात् में प्रार्थी महावीर प्रसाद वैष्णव का यह क्लेम पूर्णत रिज होने योग्य है जो एत‌द्वारा खारिज किया जाता है तथा अवार्ड इस प्रकार पारित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी यह साबित नहीं कर सका है कि वह विपक्षी से धारा 25एफ औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 के तहत कोई राहत पाने का अधिकारी हो ।

अतुल कुमार जैन, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 196. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ोदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13 ( सी )/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [फा. सं . एल-12012/176/99- आई. आर. ( बी. 11 ) ]

एन ० पी ० केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 30th December , 2003 S.O. 196.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . 13(C)/2001 ) of the Industrial Tribunal , PATNA (BIHAR) . as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute be- tween the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen , which was received by the Central Govern- ment on 29-12-2003 .

[ F. No. L - 12012/ 176/ 1999 - IR (B- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer .

ANNEXURE

OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA Reference Case No. 312 of 1999 Reference Case No. 13C of 2001

Bank of Baroda, the Deputy General Manager , BOB, 8th Floor, BSFC Building , Fraser Road , Patna and their workman Sri Dudheshwar Sharma represented by the Asstt . General Secretary , Bihar State Bank of Baroda 371 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Employee Association , C/o . Bank of Baroda , Fraser Road, Patna .

For the Management : Mr. S. K. Choudhary Senior Manager (HRM).

For theWorkman

: Sri G. N. Lal , General Secretary.

Present

: Sri Priya Saran , Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal , Patna.

Manager claiming his seniority for the assignment of Agruculture Asstt. Allowance , but his seniority was deliberately ignored and one Shri Shishir Das , a Clerk Junior to him was assigned aforesaid allowance on 23-1-96. It is also mentioned in written statement that the seniority and allied benefits in the Bank are given from the date ofdeclaration of the result of B.A. examination and accordingly , the worker was later granted two additional increments w.e.f. 31-12-95 . The Bank management has allegedly denied Agriculture Asstt. Allowance to the worker . Hence this reference .

AWARD

The 18th December , 2003

By adjudication order No. L- 12012/ 176/99- IR (B - II ) dated 29-10-1999 the Government of fodia , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi has referred , under clause (d) of sub- sechon ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 7) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act ( hereinafter to be referred to as the Act' ) , the following dispute between the Management of Bank of Baroda, Patna and their workman Sri Dudheswar Sharma.for adjudication to this Tribunal:

Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda Patna in not giving Agriculture Asstt. Allowance to Shri Dudheshwar Sharma with effect from Jan. , 96 at Tekari Branch was justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled . " ?

2. The dispute between the management of Bank ofBaroda (hereinafter to be referred as the ' management ' for short) and its worker Sri Dudheswar Sharma (hereinafter to be referred as ' worker ' for short ) arose as the worker was denied Agriculture Asstt . Allowance , when the occasion arose on 1-1-96 at Tekari Branch in this connection .

5. Bank'smanagement in its written statement has admitted that a vacancy involving additional of Agriculture Asstt . Allowance arose at Tekari Branch on 1-1-96, which was to be assigned to the Senior most clerk working over there. Necessary orders in this regard was to be passed by the Regional Office , Jamshedpur. As the Regional Office had no information that the worker Shri Sharma was a Graduate on 1-1-96 , it decided to assign Sri Shishir Das taking him to be senior- most Graduate Clerk, with the additional duties of the Agriculture Asstt . vide order dated 13/ 15-1-1996 ( Ext . M/ 1 ) . It is also averred by the management that Sri Das was otherwise senior as well in the cadre of Graduate Clerk as he had graduated on 16-7-92 whereas worker Sri Sharma had been promoted on 15-12-88 as a non -graduate clerk . The worker submitted his marksheet at the Branch on 19-1-96, which was forwarded to the Regional Office and received there on 27-1-96 , but the decision regarding assignment of duties of Agruculture Asstt . had been taken prior thereto . The Bank had no authentie documentary proof about workers ' graduation on 1-1-96 . It is further stated that Shri Shishir Das has been discharging his additional duties since 1-1-96 and is being paid for that . The worker Sri Sharma since discharging no such duties is not entitled to Agriculture Asstt. Allowance and his claim deserves to be rejected.

6. The only one point for my consideration is whether the elaim of the worker as regards Agriculture Asstt. Allowance at Tekari Branch is justified .

FINDINGS

3. Both the parties filed their written statement and contested the case . Factual part of the case is undisputed to a great extent. The worker initially joined Tekari Branch of Bank of Baroda on 29-5-85 in subordinate cadre . He was promoted to clerical cadre w.e.f. 15-12-88 . 11e passed B.A. Sociology ( Hons . ) examination from Magadh University , Bodh Gaya on 31-12-95 . After the transfer of one Sri S. N. Sharma , Agriculture Assti . to Lodhipur Branch , a vacancy with additional duties of Agriculture Asst . Allowance arose w.e.f. 1-1-96 , which as per Bank's Circular dated 17-12-82 (Ext. WL) was to be assigned to a clerk on the basis of Branch level seniority , meaning thereby that the senior- most clerk available at Tekari Branch was entitled to that.

7. As has been pointed out, the factual statement put forward by the parties have hardly any differene . The worker joined Tekari Branch of the Bank as peon on 29-5-85 . He was promoted there as clerk- cum- cashier w.e.f. 15-12-88 . His B.A. result was published by Magadh University on 31-12-95 as indicates Ext. W/4-- a Certificate issued by the Controller of Examinations . He submitted his marksheet to the Branch formally informing the Branch Manager about his graduation on 19-1-96with claim for Agriculture Asstt . Allowance duties , as being senior- most clerk at the Branch . This document was forwarded the Regional Office , Jamshedpur vide Ext. W/2and received there on 27-1-96. The Regional Office 4. As stated by the worker in his written statement , he informed the Branch Manager, Tekari about his passing B.A. examination on 31-12-95 itselfi.e. the date of publication of the result. He further submitted his marksheet an 19-1-96 to the Branch 372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART I-SEC . 3(ii) ] had however already taken a decision in this regard and one Shishir Das by order dated 13/ 15-1-96 (Ext . M/ 1 ) had. been assigned additional duties with Agriculture Asstt . Allowance , which had arisen at the Branch on 1-1-96. The Branch Manager , Tekari Branch received this order and implemented the same by his letter dated 23-1-96 (M 3 and W/3 both being same) . The implementation of the order was consequently communicated to the Regional Office on the same date by Ext. M/2 .

8. It appears from Ext . W/5 that after getting marksheetetc. the Regional Office took cognizance of workers graduation and sanctioned two additional increments effective from. 31-12-95 . Ext . W/ 1 contains Bank's guidelines in the matter of assigning Agriculture Asstt. Allowance to a clerk . Other documents exhibited by the worker are of not much relevance for us.

whereas the latter graduated only on 31-12-95. This appears to be a bald proposition with no support of evidence worth the name to the effect that the clerks were having two distinct cadres, one of graduate and the other non-graduate, and the former being senior in rank over the other. The clerks were clerks, whether graduate or not and all the more, the worker was definitely senior to Sri Das amongst the graduate clerks as well on the relevant date ie. 1-1-96. This fact was very much in the knowledge ofBranch Manager , Tekari Branch, who was duty bound to have passed the factual position on to the Regional Office before implementing order dated 13/15-1-96. Bank's Circular ( Ext . W/ 1 ) too does not make any distinction amongst clerical cadre . The learned representative ofthe management did not rightly embark on bank's above illogical clzim regarding inter se seniority between Sri Dus andworker.

11. In view of discussions, above and documents on record it looks well manifest that the claim of the worker is justified, which was illegally and deliberately ignored and superceded. His entitlement for the assignment of Agriculture Asstt. Allowance must have been considered by the management prior to filling up the vacancy. The action of the management in denying Agriculture Asstt. Allowance to the worker at Tekari Branch has thus been quite unjustified . The management is accordingly, directed to immediately take up the matter, consider workers ' claim and pass necessary order as per Rules/Circulars/Guidelines preferably within two months from the publication of the Award.

12.Award accordingly.

PRIYA SARAN , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली 30 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 197.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 121/97 ) को प्रकाशिता करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/70/96- आई. आर. ( बी. 11 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2003 9. It is abundantly clear from various documents on record that workers ' B.A. Hons . result was published on 31-12-95 and it was formally informed to the Branch Manager concerned alongwith marksheet on 19-1-96 . The Regional Office , Jamshedpur received this information on 27-1-96. The management hence says that it had no documentary proof at the Regional Office as regards workers graduation when Shri Shishir Das vide order dated 13 / 15-1-96 was given additional assignement of Agriculture Asst . at Tekari Branch . Although there appears to be a little sense in this claim but it cannot be lost sight of that above order was received at the Branch only after 19-1-96 , when the factum of workers ' graduation along with marksheet was very much in the knowledge of Branch Manager. The order as regards assignment to Shishir Das was to be implemented at the Branch level and it would had been sane and wise for the Branch Manager to have referred the matter back to the Regional Office for reconsideration in view of changed circumstances instead of having immediately offered Mr. Das the additional duties of Agriculture Asstt . It has been rightly alleged by the worker in aforesaid circumstances that the action of the Branch Manager in ignoring and superceding his claim was deliberate , motivated andwell designed. Since he got the order dated 13/ 15-1-96 (Ext . M/ 1 ) from the Regional Office only after 19-1-96, the Branch Manager should have sought clarification and further orders in the matter of implementing it because of the fact that the workers ' claim alongwith this B.A. Marksheet was already there before him . His claim must have been considered by the management for assignement against the post of Agriculture Asstt. at Tekari Branch , which was still vacant on the date of his anaining eligibility for the same .

10. The management has also stated in the written statement that Sri Das had otherwise seniority as well over the worker for being a graduate clerk since 16-7-92,

S.O. 197. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 121/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Punjab 373

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

National Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-12-2003.

[No. L- 12012/70/96-IR (B- II)]

N. P. KESAVAN, DeskOfficer.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-

CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI S.M. GOEL

CASE NO. ID 121/97

The Vice President,

Punjab National Bank,

Employees Union,

3. In written statement the management pleaded that applicant was involved in a murder case and he was acquitted by the District and Sessions Judge Ambala. The workman was not allowed pay for the period from 26-10-1988 to 25-1-1991 as he was not sanctioned any leave and not allowed wages on the principle of 'no work no pay ' and whatever was done by the State of its own, bank is not liable to make any payment of the period in question and the bank has not prosecuted him therefore, the bank is not liable to pay any pay what- soever to the workman . Enquiry was also held but that did not alter the position as the workman did not earn any salary for the intervening period on the principle of 'No work No pay' . The management has thus prayed for the rejection of the reference.

688/13 Extn. Urban Estate,

Applicant

Karnal - 132001.

4. Rejoinder was also filed reiterating the claim made in the claim statement.

Versus

Regional Manager,

5. Both parties led evidence also and filed their respective affidavit and documents .

Punjab National Bank,

PNB House , Sector -17,

Respondent

Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES

: SHRI H.C. ARORA

FOR THE WORKMAN

SHRI ASHOK

FOR THE MANAGEMENT :

KUMAR

AWARD

(Passed on 3-12-2003 )

Central Government vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 70/ 96 / IR ( B.II ) dated 3 / 12-5-1997 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

6. I have gone through the written arguments filed by the respective parties and have also perused the evidence and record of the case. The only question to be decided in this case is whether the applicant is entitled for the pay and other benefits for the period from 26-10-1988 to 25-1-1991 . It is admitted case of the parties that the applicant was behind the bar during this period in connection with the murder case and he was acquitted bythe District Judge on 24-1-1991 . The applicant was in police/judicial custody during this period and the bank had not lodged any FIR against the workman and it was the State who was party to the case. The claim of the workman is that he was behind the bar and it was beyond his control to join duty. The management in written arguinents had stressed that the applicant was not behind the har at its behest and, therefore , the bank imanagement is not liable to pay anything to the workman for this period on the principle of no work no pay basis.

"Whether the demand of the Punjab National Bank Employees Union, Ambala for payment of wages to Shri Chaman Lal Duggal, Cashier /Godown Keeper for the period from 26-10-1988 to 25-1-1991 is legal andjustified? If so, to what relief the said workman is entitled?"

7. I have gone through the rival contentions of the parties.As is admitted that the workman was behind the bar in connection with some murder case and he had not worked during this period with the bank . Moreover, the case against the workman was not registered by the management therefore , in my considered opinion , the management cannot be burdened for the pay and allowances for the period for which the applicant did not work for the bank management on the principle of 'No work No pay' basis and the bank management is not liable to pay for the intervening period. Therefore, I find nomerit in the claim of the applicant and the reference is answered against the workman . The reference is answered accordingly. Central Government be informed.

S.M. GOEL, PresidingOfficer

Chandigarh

3-12-2003

2. In the present case , the workman Chaman Lal Duggal filed the claim statement inter- alia pleading therein that he was implicated in a false case of murder and was kept in judicial lock up from 26-10-1988 to 24-1-1991 . He was lateron acquitted of the charges . The bank has not taken any disciplinary action against the workman for remaining absent and no charge sheet was issued. He has further claimed that he remained absent from duty beyond his control and as such he is entitled for pay and allowances for the above period. He has further pleaded that an enquiry officer was also appointed and he conducted the enquiry and none of the charges was proved against the workman . The applicant has thus prayed that he may be allowed salary for the period from 26-10-1988 to 25-1-1991 with all benefits .

374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/ MAGHA 4 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2003

का. आ. 198.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टीआईएससीओ के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद ( 11 ) के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 43/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल. 20012/55/2002- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एस ० एस ० गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th December , 2003 S.O. 198. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 43/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Dhanbad- 1 ] now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of TISCO and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 30-12-2003 .

[No. L- 20012/55/2002- IR (C -I ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No.2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 )(d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947

REFERENCE NO . 43 OF 2002

Parties: : Employers in relation to the management ofTisco . Ltd. and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. Baban Lal , Advocate

Mr. Shashi Kumar, Manager.

Onbehalf ofthe workman : Mr. S.S. Zama, Regional President, RCMS ,

Mr. N.G. Arun, representative of the Union.

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal .

Dated, Dhanbad , the 23rd December, 2003 .

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

AWARD

TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 55/2002-1.R . ( C- I ) , dated the 26th June, 2002.

SCHEDULE

"Kya Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh ki Tisco . ke Pravandhtantra sey mang ki N.C.W.A. VI Key anurup 1-7-96 Sey 31-12-2000 ki avadhi key liya bakaya bejis ka vugtan Tisco . Ki savi collieries key karmakaro ko turant kiyajaya uchit evam naya sangat hai ? Yadi han to is Samvandh key kya nirdesh avashyak hai " ?

2. In this reference both the parties appear and file a Memorandum of settlement under their signature . Perused the terms of Memorandum of settlement and also heard the parties on the said settlement . It transpires from the settlement that the terms contained therein are fair, proper and in accordance with the principles of natural justice.

Accordingly I accept the same and pass an Award in terms thereof which forms part of the Award as Annexure .

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

ANNEXURE FORM - ' H'

[Rules58 of Industrial Disputes (Central ) Rules , 1957 ] FORM FOR THE MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT NAMES OF PARTIES

Representing Employer(s) Representing Workmen Mr. B. Muthuraman ,

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Managing Director, The Tata Iron & Steel Co.Ltd.,

Singh President, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh Dr. T. Mukherjee,

The Tata Iron & Steel Dy.Managing Director (Steel ) Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. S.S. Zama TiscoRegional Committee and Secretary, RCMS , Digwadih Colliery Regional President , Mr. R.C. Nandrajog,

VicePresident( Finance) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. S. K. Mahato Regional Secretary , Tisco Regional Committee and Secretary, RCMS Jamadoba Colliery [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Mr. S.B. K. Sharma President, RCMS West Bokaro Colliery Mr. Niroop Mahanty, VicePresident (HRM) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ,

Mr.S.Upadhyay President, RCMS , Bhelatand Colliery Mr. A.D. Baijal Vice President ( RM & IM) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. Balram Mahato President, RCMS , Jamadoba Washery Mr. P.K. Jha, Chief Financial Controller (Corporate) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.,

Mr. Girish Mahato President, RCMS , SijuaColliery Mr. R.S. Singh , General Manager (Jharia) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.,

Mr.Bideshwari Singh President, RCMS , 6 & 7 PitsColliery Mr. A.M. Mishra, General Manager (WestBokaro) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. Ram Pravesh Singh President, RCMS, Digwadih Colliery Mr.B.N. Sarangi , Chief HR/ IR (Steel) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd..

Mr. Belal Khan President, RCMS , Jamadoba Colliery Mr. Ashok Singh , Chief HR/ IR ( RM & IM) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.,

Secretary, RCMS, Mr. G.R. Khan, SijuaColliery Mr. P.K. Pattanaik , ChiefHR/IR ( Jharia) The Tata Iron & Steel Co.Ltd. ,

Mr. A.K. Sinha Secretary, RCMS , 6& 7 Pits Colliery Mr. Arun Kumar , ChiefHR/IR (WestBokaro) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. C.S. Yadav, Secretary, RCMS , Bhelatand Colliery Mr. B.B. Das , Head(Central Team) The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. T.K. Dutta Secretary, RCMS, Jamodoba Washery Mr. Rajan Baboo, Head (Accounts) West Bokaro The Tata Iron & Steel

Co. Ltd. ,

Mr. Mahendra Singh Secretary, RCMS, WestBokaro Mr. S.R. Krishnan, Head (Accounts ) Jharia The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.,

375

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE

WHEREAS

(i) The Management of the Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited ( hereinafter referred to as the " Company" ) held discussion with the Office Bearers of the Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, Jharia and West Bokaro Collieries (hereinafter referred to as " the Union " ) on 27/3/2001 and both parties mutually agreed as under:

"The revised wage structure as per NCWA - VI will be implemented in Collieries Division ofTata Steel from the wage month of March , 2001 , payable in April , 2001 ......... Arears , ifany , will be discussed jointly between the Management and Unions at a later date ."

Subsequently, wages at revised rates for two months-January and February 2001 were agreed to be paid in October 2001.

(ii ) In pursuance of the above said agreement, the fixation ofpay of eligible employees in the revised scheme ofpay/wages was done on notional basis during the period from 1-7-1996 to 31-12-2000 and the actual payment commenced since January, 2001 .

(iii ) The Union served a strike notice dated 10-1-2002 on the Company demanding payment of arrear wages arising out of NCWA- VI . The Company did not agree to this demand of the Union on the ground that the method followed for concluding the NCWA- VI was neither satisfactory nor bi -partite in nature . Furthermore, the Company drew the attention of the Union to the circumstances and extraneous factors which influenced the wage negotiation at the JBCCI level and that employees had already been paid interim Relief@ 12% of theirBasic Pay and Fixed DA as on 30-6-1996 for the period from 1-7-1966 to 31-12-2000-which ranged from Rs . 12,560 to Rs . 29,019 at the lowest and the highest of the pre- revised wage structure.

(iv) Aggrieved with the stand of the Company, the Union resorted to a strike on 28-1-2002 while the matter was pending in conciliation before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) , Dhanbad. Due to divergent views ofthe parties, the conciliation ended in failure before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ), Dhanbad and, therefore, failure of conciliation report was sent to the Ministry of Labour, Government of India which referred the followingdispute under Section - 10( 1 ) and (2A) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 vide notification No.L- 20012/ 55/2002-IR(C- I) dated 26-6-2002 to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad for adjudication- "Whether the demand of Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh from the Management of Tisco for immediate payment ofarrear ofwages from 1-7-1996 376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] to 31-12-2000 in accordance with the NCWA - V1 to all the workmen of the Collieries ofTisco is proper and justified ? If yes , what direction is necessary. "

The aforementioned Industrial Dispute was registered before the said Tribunal and numbered as Reference Case No. 43 of 2002 .

2.1 In respect of employees who were on the roll of the Co. on 1-7-1996 and superannuated or separated under the ESS or were dismissed/discharged from service for any other reason any time prior to 1-1-2001 , the amount of lump sum payment corresponding to the applicable range ofBasic Pay and Fixed DA as per the above Table, working on the surface or underground as the case maybe, will be pro - rated, linked with their actual attendance on duly , during the period since 1-7-1996 till their separation from the roll of the Co.

( v ) The parties realize that it is in the long- term interest of both to resolve the issue in an amicable manner . Therefore , notwithstanding the pendency of the said reference , they held protracted discussions to explore a mutually acceptable resolution of the dispute in question . Accordingly, it is agreed by and between the parties to resolve the said dispute fully and finally on the following terms and conditons .

Itishereby mutually agreed as under :--

Terms and Conditions

2.2 The persons who were appointed on the permanent roll or taken on temporary roll of the Co. on or after 1-7-1996 would be eligible for payment as per the above Table, working on the surface or underground as the case may be , on pro-rata basis , linked with their actual attendance onduty, for the period since their appointment/ engagement till 31-12-2000 . The amounts of lump sum payment applicable to such employees will be the ones corresponding to their commencing Basic Pay and Fixed DA ( pre -revised) , as per the range shown in the above Table.

1.0 SCOPE This Settlement shall cover all the categories of employees - permanent and temporary at the Jharia and the West Bokaro Collieries of the Company who were on the rolls of the Co. on 30-6-1996 and thereafter, and all employees in the aforesaid categories/areas who joined the Co. on or after 1-7-1996 till 31-12-2000.

2.0 Lump sum payment on account of arrear ofwages arising out of NCWA - VI for the period from 1-7-1996 to 31-12-2000.

2.3 The lum sum payment as per the Table given in para 2.0 will not be treated as Basic Pay or Dearness Allowance and will therefore , not count for any other purpose like Annual Bonus , CMPF/CMPS, Gratuity, encashment of leave , allowances , pension/ex - gratia/ monthly payment on account of Early Separation Scheme/Medical Separation Scheme/Employee Family Benefit Scheme respectively , etc.

The employees covered under this Settlement who remained on the rolls of the Co. from 1-7-1996 to 31-12-2000 , will be eligible for payment of the maximum amount corresponding to his/her Basic Pay and Fixed DA as on 30-6-1996 , as mentioned in the Table below, working on the surface or underground as the case may be, on full attendance during the aforesaid period:

3.0 The lump sum payment as mentioned in para 2.0 will be a separate payment and will have no linkages whatsoever with the Interim Relief already paid to the eligible employees .

Lump sum payment

(Rs. per head)

Range of Basic Pay and Fixed DA ( Rs . ) as on30-06-1996

on account of wage revision arrears for the full period from 1-7-1996 to31-12-2000

Over

Upto

4.0 The parties have agreed that this Settlement is just and proper and resolves in totality, fully and finally the dispute in the matter of Reference Case No. 43 of2002 pendingbeforethe Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad and no demand on the self- same subject canbe raised by the Union or employees/ex - employees in future at any forum .

For those working on the Surface

For those

working

Underground

2210

16290

17730

2480

18050

20195

2480

5.0 The parties have also agreed to jointly file-a petition, enclosing therewith the copies of this Settlement, beforethePresiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad , praying therein to pass a consent award in terms of this Settlement .

2750

19810

22660

2750

3020

21570

25125

3020

3290

23330

27590

3200

3560

25090

30055

6.0 The payment in terms of this Settlement willbe made by the Company after the receipt of the notification ofthe consent award in the Gazette of India by the Ministry ofLabour , Government of India.

3560

3830

27850

33520

3830 &

30610

above

36985

In acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Settlement, both the parties have given 377

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माय 4, 1925

[भाग- 3( ii) ]

their Signatures to this Memorandum of Settlement on the 15thDecember, 2003.

Onbehalfof

On behalf of the Rashtriya Mazdoor Sangh The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.

Sd/- Sd/-

(Rajendra Prasad Singh ) President, RCMS (B. Muthuraman ) Managing Director

Sd/-

(S.S. Zama) (T. Mukherjee)

Dy. Managing Director (Steel) Regional President, Tisco Regional Committee and Secretary , RCMS, Digwadih Colliery

Sd/- Sd/-

(S.K. Mahato) (R.C. Nandrajog) VicePresident ( Finance) Regional Secretary, Tisco Regional Committee and Secretary, RCMS , Jamadoba Colliery

Sd/- Sd/-

(S.B.K. Sharma) (Niroop Mahanty)

VicePresident ( HRM )

President, RCMS WestBokaro Colliery

Sd/- Sd/-

(S.Upadhyay) (A.D. Baijal)

VicePresident (RM & IM) President, RCMS Bhelatand Colliery

Sd/- Sd/-

(Balram Mahato ) (P.K. Jha)

President , RCMS Jamadoba Washery Chief Financial Controller (Corp. )

Sd/- Sd/-

(GirishMahato) (R.S. Singh)

General Manager ( Jharia) President, RCMS , SijuaColliery

Sd/- Sd/-

(Bindeshwari Singh) President, RCMS, 6&7 Pits Colliery (A.M. Mishra ) General Manager (WestBokaro)

Sd/- Sd/-

(BX. Sarangi)

Chief HR/ IR (Steel )

(Ram Pravesh Singh ) President, RCMS, Digwadih Colliery 109 G /04-13

Sd/-

(Belal Khan)

(Ashok Singh)

ChiefHR/IR (RM& IM)

President, RCMS, Jamadobe Colliery

Sd/-

(G.R. Khan)

(P.K. Pattanaik)

Chief HR/IR (Jharia)

Secretary, RCMS, SijuaColliery

Sa-

Sd/-

(A.K. Sinha)

(ArunKumar)

Chief HR/IR(West Bokarb) Secretary, RCMS, 687PitsColliery

Sd/-

(C.S.Yadav)

(B.B. Das)

Head(Central Team)

Secretary,RCMS, Bhelatand Colliery

Sd/-

(T.K.Dutta) Secretary, RCMS, Jamadoba Washery (RajanBabeo) Head (Accounts) WestBokaro

Sd/-

(S.R. Krishnan)

Head (Accounts) Jharia

(Mahendra Single ) Secretary, RCMS, WestBokaro

WITNESSES

Sd/-

(P.N. Prasad)

Manager (Establishment )

(Shashi Kumar) ManagerHR/IR (CentralTeam) Jamadoba

Kolkata:

15thDecember, 2003.

Copy to : ( 1 ) Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Dhanbad

(2) Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) Dhanbad

(3) Chief Labour Commissioner (Central ) , NewDelhi

(4) The Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi .

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 199.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय अर्नाकुलम के पंचाट 378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/ MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Sri . C. Anil Kumar , Advocate,

(संदर्भ संख्या 3/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Emakulam.

ForUnion [ सं. एल. 12012/325/94- आई.आर. (बी-11 ) ]

AWARD

एन० पी० केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003

Thisreferencewas made by the Central Govemment as per order No. 12012/325 /94 - IR ( B. - II) dated 20-2-1995. Thedispute is between the management of Canara Bank, Trivandrum and their workman Sri A. Raghuthaman , Clerk representedby Canara Bank Staff Union . The dispute referred is:

S.O. 199.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 3/95) of the Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Govemment on 31-12-2003 .

[No. L- 12012/325/94- IR (B- II)]

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank, Trivandrum in imposing the penalty of stoppage ofone increment for a period of one year withcumulative effect on Shri A. Raghuthaman , Clerk videtheir orderdated 25-3-1992 is legal andjustified? If not, what relief is the said workman entitled to?"

N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

2. Pursuant to notices issued from this court the union and management appeared through counsel.

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

( IN THE LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM )

( Tuesday, the 30th day of September, 2003)

Present:

Smt . N. Thulasi Bai , B.A.LL.B. ,

Presiding Officer

Industrial Dispute No. 3 of 1995 (Central )

BETWEEN

The Deputy General Manager,

Canara Bank . CircleOffice, Trivandrum .

And

The workırian of the above concern represented by the Assistant Secretary, Canara Bank Staff Union , Kerala, Regional Committee , Paramara Building, Cochin- 18 .

3.Union fileda claim statement raising the following claims :- Sri . A Raghuthaman, the workman involved in the pesent case, had been working at the Nilambur Branch ofthe management bank since 10-6-1987 . While so on 13-9-1991 he was entrusted with temporary supervisory duties which included supervising of N.N.N.D. accounts . On that day 3 N.N.N.D. slips were prepared for closing the accounts and were sent to the Senior Manager for authorising payment of cash . The Senior Manager instructed Sri . Raghuthaman for authorising the payment as per the slips . But he hesitated to authorise payment since it was in violation of circular No. 5665/85 . The workman was called by the Senior Manager to his cabin and again directed to pass the bills for payment inspite of which the workman refused. According to the workman he refused the direction since he honestly believed that such a conduct would be detrimental to the interest of the Bank. The show cause notice was issued to the workman on 25-10-1991 in respect of the alleged misconduct . By that time the workman understood from circular No. 272/ 87 that he was authorised to pass bills. So he gave a reply to the show cause notice admitting the lapses . Then a charge sheet was issued on 9-1-1992 in reply to which also the workman admitted the lapses and randered an apology. But the management unilaterally inflicted the punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect. Against the above punishment though an appeal Representations:

Sri M. C. Sen ,

Advocate , C. S. Menon Colony, Kalathil Parambu Road , Kochi -682016 .

...For Management

waspreferred it was also ended in dismissal . According to the workman he is not guilty of any misconduct and the entire disciplinary action is vitiated by malafides. The workman acted on good faith and refused to do an act which had earnestly and honestly believed to be wrong. So the union prays for passing an award setting aside the punishment imposed on the workman.

379 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1. Whether the action of the management in imposing the penality of stoppage of one increment for a perid of one year with cumulative effect onthe workman is legal and justifiable ?

2. The relief, ifany , due to the workman ?

7. Points :-Admittedly the workman who was working as a Clerk in the Nilambur Branch of the mana- gement Bank since 10-6-1987 was entrusted with temporary supervisory duties on 13-9-1991 . It is also admitted that the supervisory duties included supervision of N.N.N.D. accounts . Admittedly 3 N.N.N.D. slips were prepared by theworkman and were sent to the Senior Manager for authorising cash payment and the Senior Manager in turn sent back the slips through peon to the workman for authorising payment . Admittedly the workman hestitated to authorise payment and so he was called upon by the Senior Manager to his cabin and personally instructed and clarified that the workman was authorised to pass cash payment up to Rs . 15,000 /- on the N.N.N.D. slips . In spite ofthat the workman refused to comply the direction. The case of the union is that such refusal was under bona fide beliefthat it is in violation of an earlier circular and he failed to note a subsequent circular which permits him passing of bills. As the workman failed to comply the direction of the Senior Manager a show cause notice was issued alleging disobedience of lawful orders by superior officers to which the workman issued a reply admitting guilt and explaining the lapses . Considering the explanation a charge memo was issued to the workman to which also he admitted the lapses on his part . As the punishment proposed to be inflicted was not discharge or dismissal , no enquiry was conducted since the workman admitted the guilt and according to the management as per the relevant provisions in the service code which is binding on the workman, if the guilt is unconditionally admitted no enquiry is necessary . It is further claimed by the management that in the matter of punishment leniency has been shown by the management .

4. The management filed a written statement raising the following contentions :-It is admitted that Sri Raghuthaman , the workman was working as a Clerk at theirNilamboor branch since 10-6-1987 and while so he was entrusted with temporary supervisory duties on 13-9-91 . On that day 3 N.N.N.D. slips were prepared for closing the concerned accounts and were sent to the Senior Manager for authorising cash payment who in turn returned the same to the workman to authorise payment . But the workman refused to comply the direction , though he was personally instructed by Senior Manager by calling him into his cabin . It was clarified by the Senior Manager that the workman has authority to authorise payment of instruments up to Rs . 15,000/- in spite ofwhich the workman was not willing to obey the direction . Such refusal caused inconvenience and delay to the customers . Further as the workman refused to obey the direction of the Senior Manager in spite ofclarification it amounts to disobey the lawful and reasonable orders of the persons placed in authority over him which amounts to misconduct within the meaning of Chapter XI , Regulation 3 , Clause B of Canara Bank Service Code . So a show cause notice was issued to the workman and since in the reply the workman admitted the guilt a chargesheet was issued on 4-2-1992. The workman admitted the charges and prayed for an apology . The disciplinary authority found the workman guilty of the charges and proposed the punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of 2 years with cumulativeeffect . Chance for personal hearing was given to him and after analysing the entire circumstances and personal hearing the discplinary authority reduced the punishment purely on humanitarian grounds and imposed the punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of one year with cumulative effect . Though an appeal was filed before the appellate authority challenging the punishment it ended in dismissal . The allegation of malafides raised by the union is denied by the management . The punishment imposed is not in excessive or disproportionate to the charges levelled against the workman. As per norms , if the chargesheeted employee unconditionally admits the charges and if the Bank does not intend to award the punishment of discharge or dismissal or enquiry need not be held in respect of the charges . So according to the management the action of the disciplinary authority and appellate Authority is justifiable and this court has no authority to interfere in the matter of punishment as per section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act since the punishment imposed is not discharge or dismissal . So the management prays for passing an award rejecting the claim ofthe union .

5.Thereafter no rejoinder was filed by the union and no oral evidence was adduced from both sides . From the management's side six documents were produced and marked as Exts . MI to M6 with consent .

8. Ext . M1 is the copy of explanation given by the workman to the chargesheet dated 9-1-92 in which he repeats his admission of fault and plea for apology . Ext.M2 isthe proceedings of the Deputy General Manager dated 25-3-1992 by which the punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of one year with cumulative effect has been imposed on the workman . Ext.M3 is the appeal memorandum filed by the workman against Ext . M2 order of the disciplinary authority . As per Ext . M4 dated 27-7-1992 appellate authoritydismissed the appeal confirming Ext . M2 order passed by the disciplinary authority. Ext. M5 is the proceedings of the DeputyGeneral Manager informing the decision of the appellate authority . Ext.M6 is the findings and orders of the disciplinarty authority dated 20-3-1992 by which stoppage of increment for a period ofone year with cumulative effect was imposed on the workman as provided under Chapter X1 , Regulation 6. Thus the points arise for determination are :

380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004 /MAGHA 4 , 1925

9( 1) ( f) of Canara Bank Service Code . It is not disputedthat as per the relevant provisions in the Canara Bank Service Code there was no necessity for conducting a domestic enquity for imposing a lesser punishment than discharge of dismissal if the delinquent employee unconditionally admits the guilt . So in the present case there is no procedural irregularity in the matter of disciplinary action since the delinquent employee had unconditionally admitted the guilt . As he tendered appology a lenient view appears to be taken in the matter of punishment also . Moreover as per section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes Act no interference in the matter of punishment can be made as per the reference since the punishment imposed isnot dismissal or discharge . Considering the documentary evidence adduced from the management's side and admission on the part of the workman I feel that the action ofthe management in imposing the penality of stoppage ofone increment for a period of one year with cumulative effect on the workman as per order dated 25-3-1992 is legal and justified . Thus it follows that the workman is not entitled to get any relief as per the reference . Points are answered accordingly .

In the result, an award is passed finding that the action of the management of Canara Bank, Trivandrum in imposing the punishment of stoppage of one increment for a period of one year with cumulative effect on Sri A. Raghuthaman , the workman involved in the present case is legal and justified thereby the workman is not entitled to get any relief as per the reference.

This award will take effect one month after its publication in the Official Gazette.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] Exhibits marked on the side of the workman :-Nil नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

का.आ. 200.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. बी. एम. बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 22/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-23012/4/2002- आई.आर. ( सी-11 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 200.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum- Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of BBMB , and their workman , which was received by the Central Governmenton 31-12-2003.

[No..L -23012/4/2002 - IR(C- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Presiding Officer:

Shri S.M. GOEL

Case No. I.D. 22 of 2003

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant , transcribed and typed out by her, corrected by me and passed this the 30thday of September, 2003 .

Ernakulam.

N. THULASI BAI , Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

Witness examined on the side of Management :-Nil Witness examined on the side ofworkman:-Nil Exhibits marked on the side of theManagement:-

Ext.M1 -Charge sheet No. 1/92 T.37 dated 9-1-1992 Ext.M2 Copy of proceedings of the DeputyGeneral Manager.

Ext.M3 Appeal dated 9-5-92 of the employee Ext.M4 Copy of Orders of the Appellate Authority.

Ext.M5 Copy of proceedings of the Deputy General Manager , dated 9-1-1992.

Ext.M6 Findings and orders of the Disciplinary Authority.

Jatinder Kumar son of Yadi Ram, C/o S -2/780 , BBMB Colony Sundernagar , District Mandi (HP)

Applicant

versus

1. The Chief Engineer, BBMB , Sundernagar Township Dist. Mandi

১ 2. The Executive Engineer , BBMB, Township Division , Sundernagar , Township ( HP) Mandi (HP) .

Respondents APPEARANCES

For the Workman:

None

For the Management: Narinder Singh Clerk

AWARD

PASSED ON 24-11-2003 Central Govt. vide notification No. L- 23012/4/2002-. IR( CM- II ) dated 27-1-03 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

381 भारत का २०जपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माभ 4, 1925

[ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

BETWEEN

Krislına Kumar, S/o Shri Ram Narayan Through Shri Ram Naresh Awashti, Minister (UTUC) U. P. Branch, 130 E, Barra-4, Kanpur "Whether the action of the Chief Engineer , BBMB, Sundernagar , Township District Mandi (HP ) in terminating the services of Shri Jatinder Kumar , son ofYadi Ram on 19-10-1996 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what reliefhe is entitled to ?"

AND

TheDirector,Board ofApprenticeship Training (Northern Region)

117-L/440 , Kakadev , Kanpur (U.P.)

AWARD

2. Case repeatedly called . None has put up appearance on behalf of the workman. It appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present reference as no claim statement has been filed by the workman. In view of the same, the present reference is answered against the workman and returned as such to the Central Govt . be informed.

S. M.GOEL, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh , 24-11-2003

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour , vide their Order No. L-42012/ 18/2001 - IR (C- II) dated 28-1-2002 referred following issue for adjudication to this Tribunal:

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

" क्या निदेशक शिक्षुता प्रशिक्षण बोर्ड ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) , कानपुर द्वारा कर्मकार श्री कृष्ण कुमार को दिनांक 16-3-2000 से नौकरी से निष्कासित करना न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं तो सम्बन्धित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ?".

का. आ. 201.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, शिक्षुता प्रशिक्षण बोर्ड प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ (संदर्भ संख्या 6/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-42012/18/2001- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003

Krishna Kumar, the workman has filed the statement of claim alleging that he worked with the opposite party from 17-12-98 to 15-3-2000 on the post of Peon-cum- Chowkidar . He worked with the opposite party without break at Faridabad Extension Centre and he worked for morethan 240 days in a year . Further he alleged that he was appointed initially at consolidated salary of Rs . 2000 permonth andwhen the workman demanded for pay scale and other facilities like other employees his services were terminated w.e.f. 16-3-2000. Therefore, he has requested that court should declare his termination unlawful and unjustified and he should be reinstated with full back wages.

S.O. 201.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 6/2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum -Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Board of Apprenticeship Training (Northern Region) and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 31-12-2003.

[No. L-42012/ 18/2001 - IR (C- II )]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT

SHRIKANT SHUKLA Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 6/2002

Ref. No. L-42012/18/2001 - IR (C- II) dated: 28-1-2002

The opposite party has denied his claim by filing written statement stating therein that the opposite party isdischarging sovereign function and being so it is not an industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) ofthe 1.D. Act . Thus, the present reference order is beyond the jurisdiction of this Tribunal . Denying the claim the workman the opposite party has alleged that the claimant is not a workman within the term ofSection 2 (s) of I.D. Act . Hence he is not entitled to maintain the present case before this Tribunal . Further the opposite party has alleged that it is a society registered under Societies Act and is fully financed by the Govt. of Inida . It is further submitted that according to theprovisions ofApprenticeship Training to the engineering graduates , diploma holders and other persons who have completed their vocational courses and for taking such training they are being paid stipend at stipulated rates out of which 50% is borne out by the Govt . of Inida/answering respondent and remaining 50% is payable by the employer where the candidates are sent for aprenticeship training by the opposite party. Thus , from these acts it is obvious that the element of profit in the working of answering 382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)] respondent is wanted and on this action the opposite party cannot be an industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) of1.D.Act. It is further alleged that as a result of temporary increase in work under the opposite party , it was felt necessary to make appointment of temporary chowkidar- cum-peon/project attendant at extension centre of the opposite party situated at Jodhpur and Faridabad to cope up with the temporary requirement of work. The opposite party vide his letter dated 11-9-97 addressed to Regional Employment Exchange , Kanpur requested to send the name of eligible candidates for temporary appointment for drawing a panel for temporary/ adhoc employees under the opposite party for utilising their services as per requirement of work . It was also clearly indicated in letter dated 11-9-97 that the post is purely temporary for two months and payment of wages shall be made treating the person as daily rated employee on lump sum rate of Rs. 1500/- per month . In response to Board's letter dated 11-9-97, the employment exchange , Kanpur vide its letter dated 15-10-97 furnished a list of 12 candidates in which the name ofpresent claimant Shri Krishna Kumar appeared at serial No. 5. All the candidates were interviewed on 31-10-97 by the opposite party by constituting Selection committee . The Selection Committee recommended the name fo claimant to be appointed on temporary/adhoc basis and accordingly a panel was prepared by the opposite party in which four candidates were placed for providing temporary /adhoc appointment as per need of opposite party . In the month of January, 1998 there was a temporary need of the service of Peon- cum- Chowkidar at extension centre of answering respondent at Jodhpur . Claimant was offered the post vide letter dated 7-1-98 in which it was clearly mentioned that the apointment is purely temporary and for a period of two months on a consolidated salary of Rs. 1500/- per month without any benefits/ allowances as are admissible to the regular/ permanent employees of the answering respondent except casual leave limited to 8 days per year on pro- rata basis. The claimant did not report for duty at Jodhpur. It is further submitted that again vide letter dated 7-12-98 , the opposite party offered the claimant the post of Chowkidar- cum- Peon at Board's extension centre at Faridabad clearly indicating therein that the he will be paid a consolidated wage at Rs . 2000/ - per month and in pursuance of that offer , the claimant joined the post at faridabad on temporary/adhoc basis on 17-12-98. This temporary engagement of the workman was renewed on 15-6-99 which was further extended for six months vide letter dated 21-6-99. Again he was offered temporary engagement for a further period of two months vide letter dated 29-12-99 and lastly histemporary engagement was extended for the period 6- 3-2000 to 15-3-2000 vide letter dated 1-3-2000 on its initial terms and conditions and joined in Boards letter dated 7- 1-98 . The services rendered by the claimant was purely on temporary/ adhoc basis and was contractual in nature between the parties to the dispute. The offers of

appintment are self-explanatory and need not clarification. Itwas decided by the opposite party to close extension centres situated at Jodhpur and faridabad w.e.f. 15-3-2000 and by order of Director dated 16-2-2000 , the extension centres at Jodhpur and Faridabad were closed after office orders on 15-3-2000 .As a result of which the contract of employment between the claimant and the opposite party stood automatically terminated w.e.f. 16-3-2000 . Under these circumstances question of terminating the services ofthe claimant w.e.f. 16-3-2000 does not arise at all. Ithas been further submitted by the opposite party that with a view to provide equal chance in public employment the opposite party prepared a panel of candidates for providing temporary/adhoc engagement as per need of theBoard and more so it was done, having regard to spirit ofarticle 14 ofthe Constitution of India and also with the viewto deprecate the policy ofpich and choose in public employment . Under these circumstances , the opposite party have adopted a very fair a practical measure for providing employment on temporary/adhoc basis and for fixed period of time to the present workman and ifdue to closure of extension centres, his contract of employment stood terminated automatically, the present claimant could not raise any grouse or claim against the opposite party especially knowing the fact and as is also clear from the various offer of engagement issued to him from time to time that his engagement under the opposite party is for a limited period on a consolidated salary and is liable to be terminated by efflux of time . It is stated by the opposite party in its written statement that the regular appointments on al the posts under the Board are made in accordance with the rules and regulations framed by the Govt. of India and it is a settled provision of law that person appointed temporarily or on adhoc basis cannot claim regular appointment as a matter of right specially who was appointed for limited period and whose services are liable tobe terminated by efflux of time stipulated in the offer of appointment . The claimant not being holder of civil post on temporary basis under the Board is not a workman under Section 2 (s) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, as the provisions of the same are not applicable on the Board, as it being an autonomous body duly registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 and totally financed and controlledbyGovt . of India, Ministry ofH.R.D. The present claimant does not fall within the definition of term ' retrenchment ' as envisaged under Section 2 (oo) of I.D. Act as his case is covered under the exempted category defined under Sub clause (bb) of Section 2 (oo) ofthe Act because he was given fixed term appointment in different spells during the period 17-12-98 to 15-3-2000. The claimant by concealing these rules and regulations is trying by way of present application to seek back door entry by virtue of his rendering purely temporary/adhoc services ofthe Board. As the claimant himself had accepted every time fresh appointment during the period 17-12-98 to 15-3-2000 , he will deemed to have waived his all previous 383

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4. The minutes of selection committee dated 31-10-97 , paperNo. 6/9 .

5. Letter dated 7-1-98, addressed to Krishna Kumar, paperNo.6/10.

6. Letter of appointment dated 7-12-98, 21-1-99 & 29-12-99, paper No. 6/11 to 6/13 .

7. Letter ofKrishna Kumar addressed to the opposite partydated 3-1-2000, paper No. 6/14.

8. Letter of appointment dated 1-3-2000, paper No. 6/15.

claims regarding continuity of service as each time he had entered into a fresh agreement with Board in connection with his temporary /adhoc engagement to cater the temporary need of the Board. Therefore, he can not take any advantage ofSection 25-F of I.D. Act. Thus, the Board has never terminated the service of the claimant and his services came to an end on 15-3-2000 by efflux of time after expiry ofterm of engagement as mentioned in Boards letter dated 1-3-2000. Therefore, it has been prayed that the statement of claim be rejected out rightly treating itto be non maintainable . It is further prayed that this Courtbe further hold that there is no merit in the demand raisedby the claimant ; hence the claimant is not entitled to any relief from the hands of the Court.

9. Letter dated 16-2-2000 addressed to extension centres Jodhpur and Faridabad informing the closure ofthe centre on 15-3-2000 , paper No. 6/16.

10. Joining letter ofKrishna Kumar dated 6-3-2000 ,paper No. 6/17.

Partieshave filed affidavits in support oftheir cases.

Workman has been cross -examined by the opposite partyon 29-5-2003 and the witness of the opposite party has been cross -examined on 23-6-2003 . Perused written argument of parties and perused the record.

The workman has been cross-examinedby the opposite party and following facts are materials for the adjudication ofthe case.

According to the workman himself he received appointment letter dated 7-1-98 but, he did not go tojoin.

Theworkman has filed the rejoinder and has denied the allegation ofthe opposite party that the dispute is not maintainable . The workman has also denied the opposite party is not an industry , though it is admitted that the opposite party is registered society. It is contended by the workman that the 1.D. Act is also applicable on the registered soceity. The workman has admitted he was offer for appionitment on 7-1-98 on the meagre salary of Rs. 1500/- for two months but since the period was small and the salary was meagre, he did not accept the offer . He has alleged that he informed the employers that unless he given permanent appointment he would notjoin the duties also that salary of Rs . 1500/- per month is not acceptable to him . The demand of the workman was accepted by the employers and therefore, there was need for employers to issue subsequent appointment letter . He has asserted that histermination from services asserts to reternchment and Section 25 - F is perfectly applicable to him .

The second letter of appointment he received on 7-12-98 and in pursuance to said letter he joined at Faridabad on 17-12-98 and he worked up to 15-6-99.

The workman has submitted the photo copies of followingdocuments:

He received another letter dated 21-6-99 and in pursuanceto said letter he joined duty on 24-6-99 and he workedup to23-12-99.

1. Letter of appointment dated 7-12-98, paper No. 4/2.

2. Photo copies of attendance register, paper No. 4/3 to4/18 .

The 3rd letter of appointment he received on 29-12-99 and in pursuance to said letter he joined duty on 3-1-2000 and worked up to 28-2-2000.

The 4th letter of appointment he received on 1-3-2000 and in pursuance to said letter he joined duty on 6-3-2000 and he worked up to 15-3-2000.

3. Photo copy of letter dated 7-1-99, 1-2-99, 3-3-99, 7-4-99, 3-5-99 , 1-6-99, 1-7-99 , 2-8-99, 2-9-99 . 14-12-99,4-1-2000, 17-8-99 & 24-7-2002 addressed to Krishna Kumar, paper No. 4/19 to4/31 .

The opposite party has filed photo copies of following documents :

1. Replication dated 4-10-2000 , which was filed before the ALC (C), Kanpur, paper No. 6/2 to6/4.

2. Letter dated 11-9-97 addressed to the Employment Office, Kanpur, paper No. 6/5 .

Buttheworker has filed only one appointment letter i.e. appointment letter dated 17-12-98 and has concealed all other appointment letters issued to him. On the other hand the opposite party has filed the appointment letter dated 7-1-98, 7-12-98, 21-6-99 , 29-12-99, 3-1-2000 and 1-3-2000. The inference will be that if he had filed the appointment letters the nature of his engagement could have been adverse to the interest of the workman.

Theopposite party has filed appointment letter dated 7-1-98 which bears the subject as under :

3. Letter dated 15-10-97 through which the Employment Exchange sent names of 12 persons , paper No. 6/7 &6/8.

384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] Contract appointment for two months on the post ofPeon-cum-Chowkidar on consolidated salary" .

opposite party finds support for the above evidence and it cannot be said that appointment of the workman was a regular one . Since there was temporary need of Peon cum Chowkidar at the extension centre and therefore , the workman was appointed . It is also made out from the evidence ofopposite party that extension centre Faridabad closed w.e.f. 15-3-2000 and therefore, it could be safely inferred that after the closure of extension centre of Faridabad the opposite party had no need of workman at Faridabad. It cannot be said that the said appointment was under the cover of sham contract . Instead I come to the conclusionthat the workman was engaged on contract basis and by closing of the centre at extension centre Faridabad and due to the fact that contract expired on 15-3-2000 the workman automatically stood out of the job.

The workman has filed following case laws:

1. 2003 (98) FLR73 (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Jagtar Singh Vs State of Punjab and others.

Thesaid case law does not help the workman, as the workman was not a probationer . The case law is about the probationer, more than 2 years of continuous service and itwas held that his services could not have been terminated without complying with mandatory provisions of sections 25-F (a) and 25 -F (b) of Industrial Disputes Act . It was held in the above case that since the service of the petitioner was terminated without notice and retrenchment compensation hence the termination of services is illegal and quashed.

In the said letter he was required to report for duty atJodhpur Extension Centre on or before 15-1-1998 . He was required to work at extension centre of Board at Jodhpur Extension Centre specifically mentioned therein that he will not get any other allowance or benefits except casual leave for one day in a month which he may avail during these months on duty only. Assistant Director of the opposite party has filed the affidavit , paper No. 7 stating the truthfulness of written statement wherein it hasbeen clearly mentioned that in the month of January , 1998 there was need of Peon cum Chowkidar at Extension Centre ofopposite party at Jodhpur . Claimant was offered the post vide letter dated 7-1-98 in which it was clearly mentioned that the appointment is purely temporary and for a period of two months on a consolidated salary of Rs. 1500/ - per month without any benefits / allowances as are admissible to the regular/permament employees of opposite party except casual leave limited to 8 days per year on pro - rata basis . The claimant did not report for duty at Jodhpur. Again vide letter dated 7-12-98 , the opposite party offered the claimant the post of Chowkidar cum Peon at Board's Extension Centre at Faridabad clearly indicating therein that he will be paid a consolidated wages at Rs. 2000/- per month and in pursuance of that offer, the claimant joined the duty at Faridabad on temporary/adhoc basis on 17-12-98 . The worker has also admitted in his cross -examination that he joined duties in pursuance of order dated 7-12-98 . The workman also admitted in his cross- examination that he worked till 15-6-99 as alleged by the opposite party that too at Faridabad .

2. 2002 (94) FLR 283 ( Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Bench) between State of Rajasthan and Kanhaiya Lal and others.

The opposite party has filed appointment letter dated 21-6-99 i.e. annexure No. 6 to written statement wherein he was again appointed for 6 months w.e.f. 24-6-99 and the workman admitted in cross - examination that in pursuance ofletter dated 21-6-99 hejoined on 24-6-99 and he worked up to23-12-99 .

In the above case the petitioner worked for 240 days . No notice or pay in lieu notice period given and therefore , the retrenchment was wrong and illegal . The present case isnot covered under the said case law as the workman in the present case worked for contracted period.

3. 2002 (94) FLR426 (MP High Court) between M.P. State Tourism Development Corporation and Smt . Sita Bai Kushwaha .

In the said case the respondent was casual labour . In the present case it was appointment for contracted period that too at extension centre , Faridabad . The facts ofthe present case are different to that one cited in the case law above .

4. 2003 (97) FLR 1065 (Madhya Pradesh High Court) between M/s . National Thermal Power Corporation and . K.K. Shrivastava and others .

Similarly, he was given another appointment letter on 29-12-99 and in pursuance of the said letter he joined on 3-1-2000 and worked up to 28-2-2000 because that appointment was for only two months as is made out from bare reading of appointment letter . The fourth letter was issued to the workman on 1-3-2000 and in pursuance of the said letter he joined on 6-3-2000 and worked up to 15-3-2000 . The appointment was for extension centre , Faridabad only . The opposite party has filed letter , annexure No. 2 dated 11-9-97 for requiring the candidates for the post of Peon cum Chowkidar for the period of 6 months and the name of the workman finds place at serial No. 5 of the list of Employment Exchange and from annexure No. 3 to written statement it is clear that Krishna Kumar was recommended for short term vacancy of Peon cum Chowkidar. The written statement and affidavit of the

The facts ofthe said case are not similar to one that ofthe present case.

385 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/ माध 4, 1925

[ भाग 11-सखण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

was necessary to make appointment of temporary Chowkidar-cum- Peon/Project:Attendantı atı Entensies centre, Faridabad which subsequently closed.

5. 1976 (33 ) FLR 297 ( Hon'ble Supreme Court) between Hindustan Steel Ltd. And State of Orissa and others.

According to 1995 Supreme Court Cases (LAS) 702, In the above noted case Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the definition of retremchment as defined in Section 2 (oo) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act would include termination of service by efflux of time in terms of an agreement betweenthe parties.

Inthe present reference the opposite party has cited 1995 Supreme Court Cases (L & S) 1279 Morinda Corporation Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs Ram Kishan and others in which it was held that cessation of work consequent to closure of the season, did not amount to retrenchment . In the present case the extension centre at Faridabad closed and there was cessation of work and it could not be said that it was a retrenchment.

Secton 2 (oo) reads as under:

Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. and othersVs Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. Employees' Union, Hyderabad and others, it was held that no functional integrity and no proximity betweenthe several units and in such circumstances each of the works or construction projects undertaken by the said compaку, held, distinct establishments and not units of a single establishment. In the said case it was provided in the appointment order itselfthat the company, while appointing itsworkmen reserved to itself liberty to transfer them from one unit to another , could not lead to a different conclusion. Hence , when one of such works came to a close, the retrenched worker of that unit had no right to demand absorption in another . In the present case it is un-doubtly clear that the extension centre at Faridabad closed on 15-3-2000 and the worker was appointed only for Extension centre, Faridabad and therefore, he cannot claint that he should be absorbed in the. Board of Apprenticeship Training (Northern Region), Kampuг.

" retrenchment" means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever , otherwise that as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not include-

(a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or

According to Industrial. Disputes Act, 1947, commentaryby S. K. Malik at page No. 926 another case ofNavodaya Vidyalaya Vs K. R. Hemavathy, 2001 ( 1 ) LLJ 779 iscitedwherein following is written:

(b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

[(bb) termination ofthe service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in thatbehalf contained therein; or ]

"Inour considered opinion , the Tribunal as also the learned single Judge have erred in directing reinstatement ofthe respondent for the sintple reason that even if the respondent can be said to have worked ontinuously for more than 240 days but still the fact remains that she was working with the appellant under fixed term contract of service and therefore it was not a ' retrehement' within the meaning ofClause (bb) of Section 2(00) oftheAct. ", (c) termination of the service of a workman on the ground of contained ill-health;

In the circumstances narrated above and the law, factsdo not find help from the following case laws:

1. FLR 1976 (32 ) Supreme Court, page 197between StateBank of India Vs. N. Sundra Money, and

2. FLR 198 (40) Supreme Court , page 373 between Santosh Gupta Vs. State Bank of Patiala.

The circumstances of the present case are that the workmanwas appointed absolutely for temporary period atExtension Counter , Faridabad, without observing the formalities of appointment as the urgency demanded by theBoard ofApprenticeship Training (Northern Region), Kanpur.

The question referred to this Tribunal is whether the termination of Krishna Kumar on 16-3-2000 is legal? In the circumstances of the facts stated above, I come to the conclusion that the workman was appointed for a period up to 15-3-2000 and there was no renewal after Theopposite party is a registered society under Societies Act and is fully financed by the Govt. of India. According to the provisions of Apprentices Act, 1961 the opposite party is imparting apprenticeship training to the engineering graduates , diploma holders and other persons who have completed their vocational courses and for aking such training they are being paid stipend at stipulated rates out of which 50% is borne out by the Government of India/answering respondent and remaining 50% is payble by the employer where the candidates are sent for apprenticeship training by the opposite party. It is thus, obvious that the element of profit in the working ofopposite party is lacking . It is also not disputed that the servic conditions of the employees ofopposite party are the same as are applicable to the other Central Goverament employees . The opposite party has proved that due to temporary increase in work under the opposite party , it

109 GI/04-14 386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/ MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II SEC . 3( ii))

AND

M/s. Central Silver Plant

because extension counter , Faridabad was closed all together . Therefore , the issue is decided against the workman and the workman cannot demand his absorption, atBoard of Apprenticeship Training (Northern Region ) , Kanpur .

Khadi & Village Industries Commission, Amawan Road, Raebareli .

AWARD

It is also noteworthy that the Board of Apprenticeship Training (Northern Region) , Kanpur does not carry out any trade or business and in the circumstances it could not be said that it is an industry and workman , Krishna Kumar is a workman.

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L - 42012/92/2001 - IR (CM - 11 ) dated : 21-11-2001 referred following issue for adjudication to this Tribunal:

On the facts stated above the issue referred is decided in affirmative and again the workman is not entitled to any relief whatsoever .

LUCKNOW

28-11-2003

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Central Silver Plant Khadi & Village Industry Commission, Raebareily in dismissing the services ofSh . Ram Shankar Rawat vide order dated 3-10-97 was legal & justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

का.आ. 202.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, लघु एवं कुटीर उद्योग प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ ( संदर्भ संख्या 173/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 42012/92/ 2001- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

एन ० पी ० केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003

S.O. 202. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 173/2001 ) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Khadi & Village Industries Commission , and their workmen , received by the Central Ciovernment on 31-12-2003 .

[No. L-42012/92/ 2001 - IR (CM- 11 ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer .

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-

CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

I.D. No. 173/2001

Ref. No. L -42012/ 92/2001 - IR ( CM - 11 ) dated 21-11-2001

BETWEEN

Ram Shankar Rawat

S/o Vishwa Nath , C/ o R.K. Verma

21/83 , Indira Nagar, Lucknow.

Theworkman's case is that he was initially engaged on 1-7-87 as Packer on daily wages basis and remained continuously in service , due to ill health the workman could not attend his duties for three months . The workman attend hisduties in the month of March , 1989, the workman became stunned to know that his initial date of appointment/ engagement has been shown as on 10-3-89 asPacker, he preferred his representation dated 15-11-90 making request to regularise his services considering his back services . The Project Manager issued a letter dated 9-12-90 stating therein that the workman has remained absent three months and again has been allowed to work on 10-3-89, therefore, his initial engagement will be deemed as on 10-3-89 . The workman has rendered his services continuously from the very beginning more than ten years and has completed more than 240 days in every calendar year . The workman preferred his representation dated 13-11-92, making request to regularize the services upon which the Project Manager issued a letter dated 1/3-12-92 by which the workman was informed that his designation hasbeen changed from Packer to mixing man w.e.f. 1-12-92 without enhancement of wages and he will have to be worked as mixing man . The workman filed a C.B. case for regularisation of seven workmen including the workman before the Deputy Labour Commissioner , Lucknow and the same was referred for adjudication before the Labour Court , 23 , A.P. Sen Road , Lucknow which is numbered as Adjudication Case No. 75/95 wherein the name of the workman was placed at serial No. 7. During the pendency ofthe adjudication case No. 75/95 , the workman has been dismissed from service in violation of principles of natural justice, without following due process of law. In the adjudication case No. 75/95 the award has been given in favour of the other workmen directing the employer to regularize the service of the workmen except the workman Ram Shankar Rawat because he was dismissed from the services of the company . The workman preferred an 387

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माथ 4, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Theworkman filed rejoinder denying the content of written statement and has insisted that he was under treatment from 10-4-97 to 25-9-97. As far as the sending of letter of an authorised absence and letter dated 15-7-97, 7-8-97, 24-8-97 and 13-9-97 , the workman has stated that the employer's reply is misconceived and not correct . It has not been denied that he has not received those communications/letters. It has been submitted that as and when employer received the medical report dated26-9-97 sent by the workman , the employer terminated his services vide dismissal order dated 3-10-97 . The worker has not denied the publication of charge sheet if the newspapers but has only said that he was on the bed in that period . With regard to allegation that Ram Shankar Rawat has takenall dues on 13/ 16-10-97 the workman has replied that same is misconceived and not correct . He has not specifically stated that he has not takendues .

The workman was directed to file evidence on affidavit on 11-9-2002, but the workman did not file his evidence on the dated fixed.

application before the Labour Court but the same was rejected on the ground that he has also filed a C.P. case before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Raibareliwhich was also rejected on the ground of jurisdiction . It was alleged that the workman remained absent without leave w.e.f. 10-4-97 and he has not sent any application for leave orany medical certificate despite several letters and notice published in newspaper . The workman's contention is that he was under treatment during the said period . Lastly it has been said that the workman was declared medically fit to resume his duties on 26-9-97 and the workman went to attend his duty along with the medical certificate but he was not allowed to enter into the campus of the factory. He returned back and sent his joining report along with the medical certificate dated 26-9-97 by registered post but no response has been given and he has been dismissed from service without any enquiry and without affording any opportunity ofhearing . The workman has accordingly alleged that the dismissal order dated 3-10-97 is illegal and unjustified and the same is liable to be set- aside and the workman is entitled to get reinstatement with full back wages, continuity of service and all other resultant and consequential benefits.

The workman was given another opportunity to file his evidence on affidavit and documents on 10-10-2002, butthe workman did not file the evidence as ordered.

Another opportunity was given to the workman to file its evidence and documents and 14-11-2002 was fixed for evidence but even then the workman did not file the evidence and no one appeared on behalfof the workman on 14-11-2002. Hence , the workman was given another opportunity fixing 8-1-2003 for evidence and documents. Butthe workman did not bother and did not appear on date so fixed.

On 8-1-2003 another opportunity was given to produce all evidence and 3-4-2003 was fixed for evidence.

On3-4-2003 none appeared and some body sent the application for adjournment but none appeared on behalf ofworkman and since already four adjournments were granted to the workman and there was no sufficient ground for granting adjournment . Therefore, the application was rejected. However , the workman was allowed to file evidence anddocuments within 15 days and 17-4-2003 wasfixed for evidence .

On 17-4-2003 some one , Dilip Kumar moved adjournment application , which was rejected, as non- production of evidence was not explained. Accordingly, 21-4-2003 was fixed for hearing .

On 21-4-2003 authorised representative of the workman , Shri R.K Verma moved an application for recall oforder dated 17-4-2003 the same was rejected by a detailed order and 9-6-2003 was fixed for evidence of the management.

On9-6-2003 the opposite party filed the photocopies ofthe documents without any affidavit . The management The opposite party has filed written statement and has stated that the workman , Ram Shankar Rawat was engaged as Packer from 10-3-1989 . The management reassessed the work of factory workers and in continuation changed designation of packer as Mixing Man , hence designation of Shri Ram Shankar Rawat has also been changed as Mixing Man w.e.f 1-12-1992. It is also alleged thatwork and conduct of Shri Ram Shankar Rawat was not good and satisfactory . Management has served many warning letters and show cause notices to him but in spite of lenient view of Management he has not mend his ways Subsequently, the workman unauthorisedly absent from 10-4-97 without any information and sanctioned leave and the management sent show cause notice through registered AD on 15-7-97 for his unauthorised absence and also in continuation ofabove letter, letters dated 7-8-97, 24-8-97 and 13-9-97 were also sent to him . Ram Shankar Rawat received the said communication but did not reply them. The management also published charge sheet in daily local newspapers of Raebareli and Lucknow on 15-9-97 but he did not join his duty in spite of letters and publications . The management in this circumstances presuming that he was not interested in his services and he has himself left/ terminated his job . This was also informed vide letter dated 3-10-1997. Thereafter , Shri Ram Shanker Rawat received all dues on 13/16-10-1997 , after full and final settlement and there is no relationship of Master and Servant in existence . On the basis above facts and circumstance Ram Shankar Rawat has himself, left his job and admitting this fact he has received full and final payment of dues . Therefore , it has been prayed in the written statement that theworker is not entitled to any relief so far.

388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] sought time for producing original documents , which was allowed, but original documents or evidence was not produced . Till today the workman has neither filed any evidence nor the workman appeared personally.

Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 10/2003 ofthe CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Disputebetween the management of M/s . MECON ( India) Ltd. and their workman , received by the Central Government.on 31-12-2003.

No body is present today. 1 am not able to hear the views of the parties .

In the circumstances I proceed with the disposal of the above referred issue to the court.

[No.L-42012/48/2000- IR(CM- II )] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALAT KOLKATA

ReferenceNo. 10 of2003

Parties:Employers in relation to the management of MECON (India) Ltd.

AND

Their workmen .

Present:

Mr. JusticeHrishikesh Banerji

PresidingOfficer

Appearances:

Onbehalf ofManagement:

The workman has not been able to prove that his termination from the service vide order dated 3-10-97 is illegal or unjustified . It is more or less admitted fact that theworkrnan absented for duty without information since 10-4-97. It is also not denied by the workman that he was not sent a show cause notice through registered AD on 15-7-97 for unauthorised absence and also in continuation ofabove letter , letter dated 7-8-97, 24-8-97 and 13-9-97 were also sent to him . It is also more or less admitted fact thatthe management published show cause notice in news paper of Lucknow and Raibareli on 15-9-97, but he did not join duties in spite of letters and publications. The workman did not turn up in spite of several letters and publications in news papers through which management directed him to report for duty , in these circumstances the management presumed that he was not interested in his services and he has himself left/ terminated his job and thiswas informed to him vide letter dated 3-10-1997 and the workman took all dues on 13 / 16-10-97 .

Mr. S. Auddy, Advocate.

Onbehalf of Workmen :

None

Industry: MECON

State: West Bengal .

AWARD

Froin the perusal of pleadings it is clear that the workman himself left the job and received the dues on 13/16-10-97 . Issue referred to this court is accordingly decided against the workman and I am of the considered view that the workman is not entitled to any relief whatsoever .

Lucknow

9-12-2003

By Order No. L -42012 /48 /2000 [ IR ( CM - II) ] dated 05-02-2003 the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 )( d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . MECON ( India) Limited , Ranchi in terminating the services of Shri Partha Biswas , Computer Assistant and Miss Mallika Talukdar, Steno- Typist employed in New Note Press Project, Salboni , Distt. Midnapore from 1992 to 31-5-1999 are justified? If not, towhat relief the workmen are entitled?" का. आ. 203.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, मैं. मेकोन इण्डिया लिमिटेड प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, कोलकाता ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. When the case is called out today , none appears for the workmen, though the management is represented by Mr. S. Auddy , Advocate .

[सं. एल.-42012/48/2000- आईआर ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003

S.O. 203. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central

3. It, however, appearss that a letter was received by poston 03-12-2003 from the workmen . They have stated in this letter that the Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L-29012/67/2000 -IR(M) dated 10-11-2000 referred the self- same industrial dispute between the same parties before thisTribunal and the Tribunal by Award dated 20-11-2002 389

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

: Applicant

C. Block, Ranjit Avenue , Amritsar (Punjab)

Versus

The District Manager ,

Food Corporation of India,

finally disposed of the matter . It further appears that the said Award was published in the Gazette of India vide Notification of even number dated 03-12-2002 . The workmen have ultimately stated that they will refrain from attending the Tribunal in the present reference.

86, Rani Ka Bagh,

: Respondent

Amritsar (Punjab)

Appearances:

4.Advocate for the management states that since the workmen do not want to proceed in this case , appropriate order may be passed .

For the Workman

Shri O. P. Aggarwal , Advocate.

Shri N. K. Zakhmi

For the Management

5. Since the parties are not interested to proceed in the case , this Tribunal has no other alternative but to dispose of the matter by pasing a " No Dispute " Award.

AWARD

(Passed on 18-11-2003) 6. A " No Dispute " Award is accordingly passed and the reference, is disposed of.

HRISHIKESH BANERJI , Presiding Officer

Central Govt . vide Gazette Notification No. L- 22012/ 217/2002 ( IR (CM - II) dated 8th ofAugust 2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Dated, Kolkata,

4th December , 2003 .

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2003

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Shri Daljit Singh son ofPuran Singh Ex-driver w.e.f. 19-1-2001 is legal and justified? Ifnot to what relief he is entitled?"

का. आ. 204.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ. सी. आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ (संदर्भ संख्या 156/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 22012/217/2002- आईआर ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

2. Today the case was fixed for filling the claim statement by the workman . The workman moved an application stating therein that the same matter under reference has been referred to Labour Court, Amritsar by the Punjab Govt . for adjudication and he wants to withdraw the present reference with a liberty to file afresh. In view ofthe same, present reference is dismissed as withdrawn withlibertyto file afresh and the same is returned to the Central Govt. as dismissed as withdrawn Central Govt. be informed.

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003

Chandigarh.

CampatAmritsar 18-11-2003

S. M.GOEL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003 S.O. 204. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 156/2003 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003 .

[No. L- 22012/217/2002- IR (C- II )]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

का. आ. 205.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, बी. बी. एम. बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ (संदर्भ संख्या 23/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल. - 23012 /7 /2002 - आईआर ( सी-II ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri S.M.GOEL

NewDelhi, the 31st December, 2003 Presiding Officer:

Case No. ID156/2003

resident of Q. No. 1274,

S.O. 205. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 23/2003 oftheCentral Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the DaljitSingh son ofPuran Singh , LIG Housing Board Colony,

1 390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

चेन्नई ( संदर्भ संख्या 63/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

industrial dispute between the management of BSL, BBMB , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003 .

[सं. एल . 42012/255/2001-आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] [No. L-23012/7/2002- IR (CM- II) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003 CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT CHANDIGARH

Shri S.M.GOEL

Presiding Officer :

I. D. 23/2003

Dharam Chand son of Bhola Ram ,

C/ o Shri Dhani Ram ,

S.O. 206. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 63/2002) ofthe Central Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of B.C.G. Vaccine Institute and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003 .

HN 782 , Phase - IV,

S.A.S. Nagar

Mohali , Punjab .

: Applicant

[No. L-42012/255/2001 - IR (CM - II)] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

Versus

ChiefEngineer,

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI BSL , BBMB Sundernagar , District Mandi ,

Monday, the 8th December, 2003 HP.

: Respondent

Appearances :

Present : K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 63/2002 :

For the Workman

None

For the Management

Narinder Singh

AWARD

(Passed on 24-11-2003)

[Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the Management of BCG Vaccine Laboratory and their workmen]

BETWEEN

SriP. Arunmozhi

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-23012/ 7/2002- (IR (CM . II ) dated 27th of January , 2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

: 1 Party/Workman And

TheDirector,

: II Party/Management

B.C.G. Vaccine Laboratory, Chennai .

Appearance:

"Whether the action of the management ofBBMB, Sundernagar, District Mandi (HP) in terminating the services of Shri Dharam Chand, beldar is legal and justified? If not, to what reliefthe concemed workman is entitled to?"

Forthe Workman

: M/ s . T. N. Sugesh & S. Ravi Advocates .

For the Management : Mr. M.T. Arunan , ACGSC . AWARD

2. Case repeatedly called . None has put up appearance on behalf of the workman . If appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present reference as no claim statement has been filed by the workman. In view of the same, the present reference is answered against the workman and returned as such to the Central Govt . Central Govt . be informed .

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L-42012/255/2001 - IR (CM -II ) dated 09-07-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

Chandigarh.

24-11-2003

S. M. GOEL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

"Whether the claim of Shri P. Arunmozhi for reinstatement in the services of the management of BCG Vaccine Laboratory , Chennai is legal and justified? If so , to what , relief he is entitled to? " का. आ. 206.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , बी.सी.जी. वेक्सीन इन्स्टीट्यूट प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण

2. After the receipt of the reference , this Tribunal has taken it on file as I.D. No. 63/2002 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement .

391 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

further their appointment were based on the recommenda- tions of the Departmental Selection Committee and after mandatory interview and therefore , it cannot be questioned as illegal by the Petitioner Hence, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed.

5. In these circumstances , the points for determi- nation are :-

(i) " Whether the Respondent Laboratory is not an industry?"

(ii) "Whether the claim of Sri P. Arunmozhi for reinstatement in service of the Respondent/Management is legal and justified?"

(iii) " To what relief the Petitioner is entitled to ? "

Point No. 1:

The Petitioner's father Sri A.R. Peethambaram worked in the Respondent BCG Vaccine Laboratory for a period of 30 years and died while he was in service on 9-2-1999. After the death of his father , the Petitioner has submitted several representations for a suitable job in the II Party/Management on compassionate grounds . While 30 , the Director (Administration ) O/o. Director General of Health Services , New Delhi , had visited the Respondent Lab at Chennai , she has recommended the case of the Petitioner for appointment . Subsequently, the Respondent had appointed the Petitioner as casual labour on 19-6-2000 . The Petitioner worked continuously from the date of his initial appointment till his non-employment i.e. upto 31-1-2001 . While so , the Respondent without giving any opportunity to the Petitioner and without any reason has refused employment to the Petitioner . No notice was issued to him and no compensation was paid to the Peti- tioner. The persons who have been appointed along with the Petitioner and the persons who have appointed sub- sequent to the Petitioner's appointment were retained and confirmed as lab peons . Therefore , the Respondent has acted in discrimination . Hence , the Petitioner has raised an industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour Com- missioner ( Central), which ended in failure and therefore, the matter was referred to this Tribunal . The Petitioner prays that an Award may be passed in his favour .

6. The first and foremost objection made by the Respondent/Management to counter the Petitioner's claim is that their laboratory is not an industry and there- fore, the Industrial Disputes Act is not applicable to them and as such this dispute cannot be entertained by this Tribunal . I think, it is a feeble attempt to counter the Petitioner's claim . The management witness has categori- cally admitted in his deposition that their lab is doing manufacturing process and they are also doing and sup- ply and distribution of vaccine and therefore , under the extended definition of industry, it cannot be argued by any stretch of imagination that the Respondent Lab is not an industry or that no industrial activities are carried on there. I, therefore, find that the Respondent Lab is an in- dustry under section 2 (j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Thus , the Point No. I is answered accordingly.

Point No. 2 :

7. In this case, the Petitioner examined himself as WW1 and produced 18 documents namely Ex . Wl to W18 . The contention of the Petitioner is that his father Sri Peethambaram , wbile he was in service under the Respon- dent/Management died on 9-2-1999 and he has made sev- eral representations to the Respondent/Management for hisappointment on compassionate grounds and he has produced Ex. W4 to W7 , which are copies of representa- tions made to the II Party/Management by him and his Mother . It is his further contention that while the Director (Administration) from Delhi Office was visiting to Madras Lab, he had given a representation to her and only on her. recommendation , he was appointed as Casual Labour from 19-6-2000 and he further says that from the date of his initial appointment he was working as Casual Labour con- tinuously till 31-1-2001 . The Petitioner also produced Ex . W8 to W16 which are proceedings and periodical orders for his appointment as casual labour . As against this, on the side ofthe Respondent Sri T. Shameem Ahmed, Refrigeration Engineer of the Laboratory was examined as MWI and on their side they have produced four docu- 4. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged that the Respondent Laboratory is not anindustry and the Industrial Disputes Act is not appli- cable to them . Hence , this claim is not maintainable before this Tribunal . Even though , the Petitioner's father was died while in service , the Petitioner has applied for a job on compassionate grounds , this Respondent has not vested with the powers to make compassionate appoint- ment and therefore, it has not done anything . Moreover , the Government of India instructed that compassionate appointments should not be made more than five per cent of the vacancies . On the other hand, in the Boondent lab compassionate Ground appointment was male more than 22% which is beyond the prescribed limit. However, the Government has prohibited the appointment of sub- staff other than through Employment Exchange . The Peti- tioner has not registered his name in Employment Ex- change. The Petitioner has not worked continuously as alleged by him . The Petitioner's appointment as Casual Labour was not extended from 31-1-2001 as there was no requirement of services of the casual labour in respect of the section , where he was posted. Since the Petitioner worked as casual labour , no notice of termination and no retrenchment compensation will arise . With regard to the contention ofthe Petitioner that his juniors were retained and appointed as lab peons , it is submitted that these individuals were sponsored by Employment Exchange and 392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ments i ,e . Ex. Ml to M4 . On behalf of the Respondent, it is contended that even though the Petitioner's father was died while he was in service , since the Respondent Lab at Chennai is not vested with the power of making compas- sionate grounds appointment, they have sent the applica- tion of the Petitioner to the higher forum and moreover, the Government has instructed that compassionate ground appointment should not be made more than five per cent of the strength and it is his further evidence that their office has already exceeded this limit and therefore, the Petitioner was not appointed on compassionate grounds . But, on the side of the Respondent , no docu- ment was produced to show that the Government has re- stricted such appointments or their lab has exceeded the above said percentage of appointment. Any how, the point at this stage is not whether the appointment is on com- passionate appointment or not, but only the termination ofthe Petitioner is valid or not . In this case , the Petitioner contended that one Sri Madanagopal , who was appointed along with him and M/s . Sasikumar, Balaji and Selvakumar who were appointed as Casual Labourers subsequent to hisappointment , were retained in the lab and some of these persons have also been confirmed as lab peons . It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that it is in total violation of the provisions under Section 25G of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947. In this case , it is admitted by the Respondent that the Petitioner's service was not ex- tended beyond 31.1.2001 and the reason stated for this is that there was no requirement of Casual Labour service in thatsection , where the Petitioner was posted . At the same time, it is the evidence of the Respondent side that the services of Mr. Madanagopal were not extended beyond 22-02-2001 but however , Mr. Madanagopal was reap- pointed as Lab Peon with effect from 26-6-2001 . It is his further evidence that Mr. Madanagopal's selection was madeby the Departmental Selection Committee and only after an interview . But , I do not understand how the De- partmental Selection Committee has made this selection ofMr. Madanagopal , while his senior (Petitioner) was not called for the interview . At this stage , the learned counsel for the Petitioner relied on the rulings

( i ) AIR 1960 SC 762 - M/s . Swadesamitran Ltd. Vs. Workmen

( ii) 2003 ( 3 ) LLN 484- State of Rajasthan Vs. Mahendra Joshi .

(iii) 1980 11 LLJ 124 - Jorehut Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Work- men

( iv) 1983 II LLJ 285 - Gaffar & Ors . Vs. U.O.I. & Others and argued that the action of the Respondent/ Management is in total violation of the provi- sions contained in Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. If the management thinks any person as surplus , ' last come - first go' prin- ciple ought to be followed . In this case , it is not

the case of the Respondent that the juniors were retained on account of any special expertise , in fact, the Respondent has not given any reason at the time of non -employment, for retaining the Petitioner'sjuniors namely Mr. Madanagopal and others while refusing employment to the Peti- tioner and therefore , non -employment is in total violation of the provisions contained in Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act. Therefore, the non-employment of the Retitioner is illegal . In 1960 SCC 762 , the Supreme Court has heldthat "even though the management has right to re- trenchaworkman provided retrenchment isjus- tified, in effecting retrenchment the management normally has to adopt and give effect to the in- dustrial rule ofretrenchment' last comefirst go'. For valid reasons it may depart from the said rule. Ifthe departurefrom the said ruledoes not appear to the industrial Tribunal as valid or satisfactory, then the action ofthe management in so departingfrom the rule can be treated by the Tribunal as being mala fide as amounting to unfair labour practice in other words, depar- ture from the ordinary industrial rule of re- trenchment without any justification may itself, in a proper case, lead to the interference that theimpugned retrenchment is the result ofulte- rior considerations and as such it is mala fide and amounts to unfair labour practice and victimisation. " In 1980 II LLJ 124 the Supreme Court has held that " the Rule underlying Sec- tion 25G is that the employer shall retrench the workmenwho came last, first, popularly known as' last come, first go' . Of course, it is not an inflexible rule and departure may bejustified in exceptional situations . There must be a valid reasonfor this departure and the burden is on themanagement to substantiate the deviation . " From these decisions, it is clear that if the man- agement wanted to retrench a workman , it should follow the general rule ' last come, first go ' . In this case, even though Mr. Madanagopal , Ca- sunt Labour has been appointed subsequent to the appointment of the Petitioner , it is admitted that Mr. Madanagopal was reappointed in the Respondent Lab . I find, it is a clear flagrant viola- tion of the provisions laid down under Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act and as such , it isillegal . Further, on behalfofthe Respondent, it iscontended that the requirement of casual labour in the section, where the Petitioner was posted did not require extension, and thesefore the ser- vice of the Petitioner was not extended for that job . But, I find there is no substance in the said contention because MWI has clearly stated ; that the entire lab is a single unit and for the 393

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Witnesses Examined:

: WWI SriP . Arunmoahi

ForI Party/Potitioner

ForII Party/Management : MWI Sri T. ShamcomAhmed

Documents Marked:

Forthe I Party/Workman:

Description

Ex. No.

Date

08-06-93 Xerox copy of the Employment Exchange Registration card ofthe Petitioner.

purpose of seniority , it is considered as single unit . Under such circumstances , while the senior namely the Petitioner was not given an opportu- nity how the Respondent can take his junior Mr. Madanagopal as Lab Peon . When the lab itself is a single establishment, non -employment ofPeti- tioner alone while retaining the similarly placed persons Mr. Madanagopal and others , who were juniors to the Petitioner working in other sec- tions , is also illegal and total violation ofthe pro- visions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

W2 Mar. 1995 Xerox copy ofthe HSC Marksheet ofPetitioner.

W3 07-06-2000 Xerox copy of the community cer- icate of Petitioner.

21-06-99 Xerox copy ofthe representation given by Petitioner to Respon- dent/Management.

31-08-99 Xerox copy of the representation given by Petitioner to Respon dent/Management.

W6 Oct. 1999 Хетоx copy of the representation given by Mother of Petitioner to Respondent/Management.

W7 17-04-2000 Xerox copy of the representation given by Mother of Petitioner to Respondent/Management.

W8 09-06-2000 Original memo issued byRespon- dent to Petitioner . On his selec- tion as Casual Labour .

8. On the side of the Respondent, it is argued that the Government restricted the appointment of sub-staff cadre directly and only through Employment Exchange such appointment should be made and since the Petitioner was recommended by the Director (Administration) of Delhi Office, he has been given this job and while the Employment Exchange candidates were available, his ser- vice has been closed . But, here again , I find there is no substance in this contention because , the Petitioner has produced Employment Exchange registration card as Ex. WI . Even in the year 1993 , the Petitioner has registered his name and therefore , I find the contention of the Re- spondent is not valid . It is also to be looked into that the Petitioner was also appointed consequent to the selec- tion by the Departmental Selection Committee as a Casual Labour . Under such circumstances , I do not find any rea- son against the contention of the Respondent that Mr. Madanagopal was re- appointed by the Departmental Se- lection Committee subsequent to the ouster of the Peti- tioner . Therefore , on any ground, the contention of the Respondent cannot be upheld and hence, i find this point in favour of the Petitioner .

W9 13-06-2000

Point No. 3 :

Letter from Respondent totheDi- rector, Institute of Thoracic Medi- cine, Chennai referring the Peti- tioner for medical examination.

9. The next point to be decided in this case is to whatrelief the Petitioner is entitled?

W10 19-06-2000 Xerox copy of the office order passed by Respondent with re- gard to inter section transfer.

WII 19-06-2000 Order issued by Respondent toPe titioner for his engagement asdaily rated Casual Labour for the period from 19th June to 30th June , 2000 .

04-07-2000

W12

Order issued by Respondent to the Casual Labourers for the pe- riod from 1st to 31st July, 2000.

In this case , the Petitioner has stated that he has been illegally terminated by the Respondent/ Management w.e.f. 31.1.2001 . In view of my finding that the termination of the Petitioner from service is not legal , I find the Petitioner is entitled to the relief prayed for . Therefore , I direct the Respondent/BCG Vaccine Laboratory , Chennai , to reinstate the Petitioner Sri P. Arunmozhi into service with full back wages and continuity of service and pay ali other consequential benefits . No Costs .

W13

10. The reference is answered accordingly .

31-07-2000 Order issued by Respondent to the Casual Labourers for the pe- riod from 1st to 31st August, 2000.

W14 05-10-2000

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, cocted and pronounced by me in the open court on this da; 8th December, 2003.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Order issuedby Respondent to the Casual Labourers for the period from Ist to 31st October, 2000.

109GI/04-15 394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

W15 Nov. 2000 Order issued by Respondent to the Casual Labourers For the period from Ist to 30th November, 2000.

W16 11-12-2000 Order issued by Respondent to the Casual Labourers For the period from 11th to 31st December, 2000.

W17 05-11-2001 Copy ofthe petition filed by Peti- tioner before Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) raising In- dustrial dispute.

W18 09-07-2002 Copy of the order of reference issued byMinistry in this dispute ..

For the 11 Party/Management :

Ex . No.

Date Description

18.10.03 Letter of authority given by Respondent to Sri T. Shameem Ahmed to give evidence on be- half of Respondent.

03.06.99 Order issued by the Respondent to Senthil Kumar Engaging him as Casual Labour from 3rd to 30th June, 1999 .

23.02.01 Xerox copy of the order issued to one Mr. R. Madhana Gopal ap- pointing him as Animal Attendant w.e.f. 23.2.2001 .

31.10.01 Copy ofthe reply filed by Respon- dent before the Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central ) in Respect ofdispute raisedby Petitioner.

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 207.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , बी.बी.एम.बी. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ ( संदर्भ संख्या 26/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल. 23012/ 13/2002- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन.पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003 S.O. 207. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 26/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Industrial Dispute between the management of BBMB and their workman , was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003 .

[No. L- 23012/ 13/2002 - IR (CM- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Presiding Officer : Shri S. M. Goel

Casco. ID 26/2003

Jagjit Singh C/ o Shri R. K. Singh Parmer , Secretary INTUC, Brari PartapNagar, Nangal Dam, H. N. 211 - L District Ropar (Punjab)

...Applicant

Versus

1. ChiefEngineer , BSL Project, BBMB Sundernagar , Distt. Mandi . H.P.

2. B.B.M.B. Sector- 19 - B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh .

3. Chief Engineer , System Operations , BBMB Sector 19-B Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

None

For the Management

Shri Narinder Singh

AWARD

(Passed ON 24-11-2003) Central Govt. vide notification No. L- 23012/ 13/2002 IR( CM - 11 ) dated 5th February, 2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of BBMB, Sundernagar in terminating the services of Shri JagjitSingh daily rated Beldar w.e.f. 31-3-1984 is legal andjustified ? If not , to what reliefhe is entitled to ?"

2. Case repeatedly called. None has put up appearance on behalf of the workman . It appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present reference as no claim statement has been filed by the workman . In view of the same, the present reference is answered against the workman and returned as such to the Central Govt . be informed.

Chandigarh .

24-11-2003

S.M. GOEL, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 208.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केद्रीय विद्यालय प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट 395

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई (संदर्भ संख्या 597/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the Principal , Kendriya Vidyalaya, IIT Campus , Chennai in terminating the services of Shri C. Venkatesan w.e.f. 8-11-1999 is legal and justified? If not to what relief he is entitled?"

[सं . एल . 42012/ 19/2000- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 597/2001 and notices were issued to both the parties andboth the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement .

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

S.O. 208.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 597/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kendriya Vidyalaya and their workman, which was received bythe Central Government on 31-12-2003.

[No. L-42012/ 19/2000- IR(C-II)]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENNΑΙ

Monday, the 8th December, 2003

Present : K. JAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer

Industrial Dispute No. 597/2001-

(Inthe matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chennai and their workmen).

BETWEEN

Sri C. Venkatesan, : 1st Party/Workman AND

: IInd Party/Management

ThePrincipal ,

Kendriya Vidyalya, Chennai

APPEARANCE :

For the Petitioner

: M/s . D. Hariparanthaman & Ajoy Khose , Advocates .

For the Management :

The II Party is a school affiliated to CBSE and run by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and the Regional Office of the same is in the II Party school campus . The II Party school was running both sports hostel and general hostel. In that one cook, one bearer , one masalchi one LDC and one nurse were employed . Out ofthese the nurse and LDC werepermanent employees and the other three staff members were temporary employees . The I Party /Workman was offered the post of Masalchi and one Mr. A.S. Ramanarayanan who was offered the post ofbearer by the orders of the Respondent on 23-12-87 and 7-12-87 respectively. The II Party also assured that the I Partywould be regularised in due course and informed that any newly recruited persons would be issued only such orders in the beginning. Based on that the I Party employee joined the work and he was initially paid wages from the hostel funds subsequently from the school funds . Apart from doing his normal work, he was involved in other works as instructed bythe Principal and the Assistant Commissioner. Sincehe had to stay in the hostel he had to work round the clock. Further , he was also paid bonus from 1991 onwards like other staff inthe school . Whenever vacancy arises , the II Party school will cell for applications from the employees who are in the service and would also call for applications from the open market . While making recruitment in the above way, the employees working in the hostelwere given preference in the appointment . In the above manner, 11 persons who have worked in the hostel were given appointment inGroup D posts on various dates . Similarly, the I Party/Workman received a letter dated 23-07-88 from thePrincipal in this regard. Based on that letter, the I Party/ Workman has made an application for the post ofGroup D. When the hostel was going to be closed, the I Party made arepresentation on 9-3-98 to the Commissioner through the Principal for deployment ofGroup D employee in any of the Vidyalayas or Regional Office as he has become M/ s. M. Vaidyanathan , N. Sankar, &A. R. Ramanarayanan , Advocates .

AWARD

over-aged for employment in any other Govt . public or private establishment . The Assistant Commissioner officiating had also strongly recommended for his deployment as Group D employee in any of the schools under the control ofRegional Office. Thus , the I Party had been working continuously without any break from 25-12-87. While so , the II Party by an order dated 8-11-99 The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L -42012/ 19/2000- IR (C- II ) dated 06-07-20002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-- 396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24 , IA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

3 (ii) ]

[PART II-SEC .

hiswork. Though he has been selected on temporary basis , since it was a permanent and continuous post, only on the reasonable and legitimate expectation that he would be absorbed, as assured at the time of appointment and such employment were given in the case of persons who had worked in the hostel prior to his appointment, he has joined duty.While so, on 8.11.1999 the Respondent/Management hasterminated his service and therefore , he filed this claim before this Tribunal .

dispensed with the service of the I Party with immediate effect . Beforeterminating the services of the workman , the Il Party management did not issue any notice in writing informing the reason for his termination . Further, they have not given any compensation . Hence , he has raised adispute before the conciliation officer . Since it was ended in failure, the reference was made by the Govt . to this Tribunal . The action of the II Party/ Management in terminating the services of I Party is illegal , arbitrary, unjust and the said order is liable to be set aside by this Tribunal. Hence , he prays that an Award may be passed in his favour.

8. As against this, it is the contention of the Respondent/Management that even in the appointment order, it is clearly mentioned that it is a temporary post and he will be terminated at any time without any notice and therefore, the Petitioner cannot claim for regularisation of his post in Group D and therefore, the petition is not maintainable.

9. Learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that eventhough the I Party was appointed as a masalchi in the hostel , he was doing Group D work from the year 1997. Apart from doing his regular and routine work in the hostel andfrom February, 1999 he was exclusively doingGroupD work as there was no students in the hostel and therefore, his service was continuous and he had put in more than 240 days of continuous service in performing Group D work. Therefore, discontinuing or terminating his work whenthe work continued to exist amounts to retrenchment. Before terminating his service , he was not given a notice as contemplated under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and therefore , the termination is void ab initio and it is non est order.

4. The II Party/Management in its Counter Statement alleged that no doubt the I Party was offered an appointment as masalchi on temporary basis . It is clearly and specifically mentioned that the appointment was purely on temporary basis and can be terminated at any time without any notice . Only after going through the letter and having understood its contents , the I Party accepted the same. The II Party has not given any posting to Group D service merely because he has served as masalchi in the hostel. It is false to allege that the II Party has made any kind of assurance to I Party much less of being regularised in service . Since the strength of sportsmen was declined every year and in 1997-98 only five students were present and in 1998-99 merely three students were present, there was little work for the sports hostel employees and hoping that situation will improve, they were engaged in some other meaningful work . Since the I Party was a sports hostel staff, his services were utilised as a member of escort team . Since it became very clear that nobody was interested in joining the sports hostel , is very existence was in peril , therefore, despite the best efforts of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sankatan, the hostel could not keep going on and hence, it was closed. By virtue of closure of sports hostel, canteen attached to sports hostel was also necessarily had to be closed. Left with no other alternative , the II Party had issued memorandum dated 23-12-87 . Therefore , the mode of termination was as per the offer of appointment mentioned above . Therefore , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In these circumstances , the points to be decided in this case are-

( i ) " Whether the action of the Principal , Kendriya Vidyalaya , IIT Campus, Chennai in terminating the services of Sri C. Venkatesan with effect from 8.11.99 is legal and justified?

10. On behalf of the Respondent, it is argued that even in the appointment order, it is clearly stated that the post ofmasalchi is only temporary and he must have known the fact that his work will be terminated at any time. Since the I Party was appointed as masalchi in the hostel and there were only three students studying till 31.3.99 and there was no student in the sports hostel from 1.4.99, even the steps were taken by the II Party/Management to revive the sports hostel but in vein and therefore , the II Party/ Management informed the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sankatan, New Delhi and the New Delhi office passed an order for closing the sports hostel with immediate effect . Therefore, the services of the I Party were terminated. Since it is purely on temporary basis and wages were given by calculating the daily wages , the I Party was not eligible for any retrenchment benefits .

( ii) "To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :

6. In this case, the Petitioner has examined himself asWWI and marked 16 documents as Ex . WI to W16 and on the side of the II Party/ Management the Vice Principal was examined as MWI and marked only one document .

7. The case of the I Party is that he has been appointed as a masalchi from 23.12.87 in the hostel maintained by the II Party/Management on a consolidated salary of Rs.250/- per month and he was continuously doing

11. On behalf of the 1 Party, it is argued that the I Party has put in 12 long years of continuous service and he was paid wages from school funds and not from hostel funds from 1990 and therefore , the action of the Respondent/ Management in keeping him as temporary for such long years is nothing but an arbitrary and colourful exercise of powers and also to deprive the Petitioner from the privilege and status of permanent workman and therefore, it is a clear case ofunfair labour practice . It is his further argument thatwhen five persons were appointed for hostel namely 397 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

one cook , one bearer , one masalchi , one LDC and one nurse were worked, after the closure of the sports hostel, the LDC& Nurse were continued in service in other vidyalayas and the I Party/workman alone was terminated from service. The II Party should have also continued the service ofthe I Party in any of the schools under the control of Regional Office while continuing the services oftwo other workmen. Terminating the services of the I Party/Workman is a discriminatory and therefore, it is not valid in law. But, on the other hand, the Respondent contended that though the LDC and Nurse are continued in service of other Vidyalayas , they were permanent employees and therefore, itcannot be equated for the I Party/Petitioner and as such, the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

to strain their eyesight every moment of the driving, keeping a watchful eye on the roadfor the bumps, bends andslopes, and to avoid all kinds ofobstacles on the way. It is this constant straining of eyes on the road which takes its inevitable toll oftheir vision. It also shows that weakening of the eyesight is not an isolated phenomenon but a widespread risk to which those who take the employment as a driver expose themselves. Yet the Corporation treats their cases in the same manner and fashion as it treats the cases of other workmen who on account of reasons not connected with the employment suffer from ill health or continued ill health. That by itself is a discriminatory against the drivers and thus the Supreme Court evolving a scheme and giving the Respondent/Management directions and said after their incapacity to work only as drivers and are not rendered incapable oftaking any other jobs either in corporation or outside. Further the workman are at an advanced age oftheir life and it would be difficult for them to get a suitable alternative employment outside and as such the Supreme Court observed that the relief made available under the scheme should not be such as would induce the workmen tofeign disability which in the case ofdisability such the present one i.e. the development of a defective eyesight and formulated scheme for alternative accommodation for the drivers . In this case, the I Party/ Workman only on a reasonable and legitimate expectation that he would be absorbed in Group D post , as given in the cases of those persons who had worked in the post prior to the I Party/Workman , he was working faithfully and loyally and without any remarks for all these years . Further, at this later stage, if he has been terminated from service, he has become over aged and unfit for any employment in any other public or Govt . or private establishments and under such circumstances , the welfare measure is to be taken in favour of the Petitioner:

12. But , again the counsel for the Petitioner argued that in the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen , Act, 1981 , it is clearly stated that if a workman had put in more than 480 days in 24 calendar months from the date of his joining , he shall be made permanent . Under such circumstances , the I Party/ Workman had put in more than twelve years of continuous service and therefore, he is entitled to the benefits of the said Act. But , on behalf of the Respondent , it is contended that even though it is contended that as per Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 , the Petitioner/Workman should be made permanent, since the Petitioner was appointed as a temporary, unless a person is appointed on regular basis , according to rules , there is no question of regularisation of service . Even the Supreme Court has held in number of decisions that ' if there was no sanctioned post in existence to which a workman said to have been appointed and assignment was an ad - hoc one , which anticipatedly spent itself found it is difficult to envisage for them , the status of workman and analogy of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act imparting the incidence of completion of240 days of work.... The completion of 240 days work does not in law impart the right of regularisation and therefore , for argument sake , if the Court has come to a conclusion that he has worked for more than 12 years of continuous service , the I Party is not entitled for any regularisation and therefore, his claim is to be rejected .

14. I find much force in this contention because even though the Petitioner / Workman was appointed as a masalchi on temporary basis , the action of the II Party/ Management in keeping him as a temporary for years together is nothing but an arbitrary and colourful exercise. Further , it is the evidence of the Vice- Principal that there were about 58 schools at the beginning in the Chennai region under the control of KVS and in case of staff of Sankathan, they are transferable to any other schools and in case , if there is a surplus , the surplus will be accommodated in any one of the above schools . Similarly, if there is any shortage , staff will be transferred to that place.Under such circumstances , it cannot be said even in all the 58 schools there is no vacancy to accommodate the I Party/Workman . Since he has been taken as a temporary masalchi , it is clearly noted that even though the Petitioner was appointed on temporary basis , he has served more than twelve years in that post, and therefore , keeping him in the teinporary status for more than twelve years is to deprive him the privilege and status of permanent workmen 13. Again , on behalf of the I Party it is argued that the Principal of the II Party/Management has also recommended the Petitioner for appointment to the post of Group D and it cannot be said merely because the hostel was closed , the Petitioner is not entitled for any regularisation . On the other hand, the II Party /Management ought to have appointed the Petitioner as Group D. Further even in the case , wheredrivers of roadways buses developing defective eyesight after serving long number of years of service , the Supreme Court has held that " all of them are above 40 years of age and their superannuation age is 58 years . The drivers developedweak or sub - normal eyesight or lost their required vision on account of their occupation as drivers in the corporation. They are required 398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] W3 26-07-88 Service certificate issued by Respondent to Petitioner .

W4

02-06-89

Service certificate issuedby Respondent to Petitioner.

W5

09-08-90

Хегох copy of the memo issued by Deputy Commissioner, KVS, New Delhi regardingwages .

W6 06-08-91 Letter from Principal, K.V. Madras to Petitioner.

W7

11-10-96

Letter from Principal , K.V. Madras to Principal K.V. Tirunelveli forwarding the Petitioners application.

W8

09-03-98

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Commissioner , K.V.S. New Delhi regarding appointment as GroupD.

W9

26-02-99

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Assistant Commissioner regarding appointment as GroupD.

W10 05-07-99

andtherefore , it is a clear unfair labour practice within the meaning of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Even though , the witness of the Respondent/Management states that the Delhi authorities have restricted the appointment of LDC and also Group D appointment, the Respondent has not produced any document to show that the appointment ofL.DC and Group D had been barred from the year 1999. It is also a fact that the Petitioner/ Workman was initially paid from the hostel funds and subsequently paid out of the school funds and it is also a fact that even though the Petitioner was appointed as temporary masalchi în the sports hostel his services were utilised by the school authorities for the Group D post . Under such circumstances , I find there is no point in the contention of the Respondent that merely because his appointment was temporary , regularisation should not be made to the Petitioner/ Workman. It is clear from the evidence of the Vice -Principal that even prior to and after the termination of the Petitioner there was / is vacancy in Group D post in the KVS and also in the schools . Therefore , I think , it is not difficult for the 11 Party /Management to accommodate the I Party in any one of the schools or office . Therefore, I find this point in favour of the Petitioner.

Point No. 2:--

Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Assistant Commissioner regarding appointment as Group D.

W11 05-07-99

Xerox copy ofthe bio-data of Petitioner.

W12 08-11-99

15. The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

Office order issued by Respondent to Petitioner .

W13

23-12-99

Copy of letter from Petitioner to Assistant Commissioner appointment as GroupD. for W14 03-12-91 Xerox copy of the letter from Deputy Commissioner To Principal regarding grant ofbonus .

W15 16-06-94

Inview of my foregoing findings , I find the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement and as such I direct the II Party/ Management the Principal , Kendriya Vidyalaya, IIT campus , Chennai , to reinstate the I Party /Petitioner Sri C. Venkatesan in Group D post with continuity of service and other attendant benefits . With regard to back wages , I find since the Petitioner/Workman was not in service from the year 1999, the Petitioner Sri C. Venkatesan is entitled to only half back wages . No Costs .

16. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 8th December , 2003. )

Xerox copy of the order issued by Assistant Commissioner to Principal for payment ofwages to Kitchen staff.

W16 05-08-94 Xerox copy of the order issued by Assistant Commissioner to Principal , K.V. Guwalior for payment of wages to Kitchen staff.

For the II Party/Management :--

Ex.No. Date

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Description

MI

28-10-99

Witnesses Examined : --

For the I Party / Workman : Sri C. Venkatesan

For the II Party/Management : Smt . S. Sasikala

Documents Marked:-For the I Party /Workman: - Ex . No. Date

Description

WI 23-12-87 Order of appointment issued to Petitioner .

W2 23-07-88 Call letter for attending interview for the postofGroup D received from Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sulur .

Xerox copy of the office order issued by K.V.S. New Delhi to II Party/Management नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 209.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय विद्यालय प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई (संदर्भ संख्या 596/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल.-42012/13/2000- आई.आर. (सी- II ) ]

एन.पी. केशवन , डेस्क अधिकारी 399 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their respective Claim Statement and Counter Statement .

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

S.O. 209.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 596/2001 ) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation on the management of Kendriya Vidyalaya, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003.

[No. L-420012/ 13/2000- IR (C- II) ]

N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Monday, the 8th December, 2003

Present :

K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 596/2001

[Inthe matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofSub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2( A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chennai and their workmen]

BETWEEN

I Party/Workman

Sri A.S. Ramanarayanan ,

AND

: II Party/Management

The Principal , Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chennai

APPEARANCE :

For the Petitioner

: M/s . D. Hariparanthaman and Ajoy Khose, Advocates.

For the Management : M/s . M. Vaidyanathan , N. Sankar,& A.R. Ramanarayanan , Advocates .

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L -42012/13/2000- IR (C- II ) dated 6-7-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication :-

"Whether the action of the Principal , Kendriya Vidyalaya, IIT Campus , Chennai in terminating the services of Shri A.S. Ramanarayanan, workman w.e.f. 8-11-1999 is legal and justified ? If not what reliefhe isentitled ? י

The II Party is a school affiliated to CBSE and run by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and the Regional Office of the same is in the II Party school campcampus . The II Party school was running both sports hostel and general hostel . Inthat one cook, one bearer, one masalchi one LDC and one nurse were employed. Out of these the nurse and LDC were permanent employees and the other three staff members were temporary employees . The I Party/ Workman was offered the post of bearer and one Mr. Venkatesan who was offered the post of masalchi by the orders of Respondent on 7-12-87 and 25-12-87 respectively . The II Party also assured that the I party would be regularised indue course and informed that any newly recruited persons would be issued only such orders in the beginning . Based on that, the I Party employee joined the work and he was initially paid wages from the hostel funds subsequently from the school funds. Apart from doing his normal work , hewas involved in other works as instructed by the Principal and the Assistant Commissioner. He was also sent as escort to the students who were sent for coaching and other events . Since he had to stay in the hostel he had to work round the clock. Further, he was also paid bonus from 1991 onwards like other staff in the school . Whenever vacancy arises , the II Party school will call for applications from the employees who are in the service and would also call for applications from the open market . While making recruitment in the above way, the employees working in the hostel were given preference in the appointment. In the above manner , 11 persons who have worked in the hostel were given appointment in Group D posts on various dates . Similarly, the I Party/ Workman received a letter dated 10-11-95 from the Principal in this regard . Based on that letter, the I party/workman has made an application for the post ofLDC and he was called for to appear in the written examination held on 16-7-97 and a typewriting test held on 17-7-97 . The I Party/Workman appeared for the written examination and also typewriting examination held in the Regional Office .He was selected and included in the main panel at Serial No. I for appointment to the post of LDC . When the hostel was going to be closed, the I Party made a representation on 9-3-98 to the Commissioner through the Principal for development of Group D employee in any ofthe Vidalayas or Regional Office as he has become over- aged for employment in any other Govt . public or private establishment . The Assistant Commissioner officiatinghad also strongly recommended for his deployment as Group D employee in any of the schools under the control of Regional Office . Thus , the I Party had been working continuously without any break from 7-12-87 . While so , the II Party by an order dated 8-11-99 dispensed with the 2. After the receipt ofthe reference , was taken on file as I.D. No. 596/2001 and notices were issued to both 400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004 /MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] service of the I Party with immediate effect . Before terminating the services of the workman , the II Party management did not issue any notice in writing informing the reason for his termination . Further, they have not given any compensation . Hence , he has raised a dispute before the conciliation officer . Since it was ended in failure , the reference was made by the Govt . to this Tribunal . The action ofthe 11 Party /Management in terminating the services of I Party is illegal , arbitrary , unjust and the said order is liable to be set aside by this Tribunal . Hence , he prays that an Award may be passed in his favour .

by the II Party/Management on a consolidated salary of Rs . 250/ - per month and he was continuously doing his work . Though he has been selected on temporary basis, since it was a permanent and continuous post, only on the reasonable and legitimate expectation that he would be absorbed, as assured at the time of appointment and such employment were given in the case of persons who had worked in the hostel prior to his appointment, he has joined duty. While so, on 8-11-1999 the Respondent/Management has terminated his service and therefore, he filed this claim before this Tribunal .

8. As against this , it is the contention of the Respondent/Management that even in the appointment order, it is clearly mentioned that it is a temporary post and he will be terminated at any time without any notice and therefore , the Petitioner cannot claim, for regularisation of his post in Group D and therefore , the petition is not maintainable .

9. Learned counsel for the Petitioner arguned that even though the I Party was appointed as a bearer in the hostel , he was doing Group D work from the year 1997 . Apart from doing his regular and routine work in the hostel and from February, 1999 he was exclusively doing Group D work as there was no students in the hostel and therefore, his service was continuous and he had put in more than 240 days ofcontiuous service in performing Group D work. Therefore, discontinuing and terminating his work when the work continued to exist amounts to retrenchment . Before terminating his service , he was not given a notice ascontemplated under section 25F of the Industrial DisputesAct , 1947 and therefore, the termination is void ab initio and it is non est order .

4. The II Party/Management in its Counter Statement alleged that no doubt the I Party was offered an appointment as bearer on temporary basis . It is clearly and specifically mentioned that the appointment was purely on temporary basis and can be terminated at any time without any notice. Only after going through the letter and having understood its contents , the I Party accepted the same . The II Party has not given any posting to Group D service merely because they have served as bearer , masalchi in the hostel . It is false to allege that the II party has made any kind of assurance to I Party much less of being regularised in service . Since the strength of sportsmen was declined every year and in 1997-98 only five students were present and in 1998-99 merely three students were present , there was little work for the sports hostel employees and hoping that situation will improve , they were engaged in some other meaningful work . Since the I Party was a sports hostel staff, his services were utilised as a member of escort team . Since it become very clear that nobody was interested in joining the sports hostel , its very existence was in peril , therefore, despite the best efforts of Kendriya Vidayala Sankatan , the hostal could not keep going on and hence, it was closed . By virtue of closure of sports hostel , canteen attached to sports hostel was also necessarily had to closed. left with no other alternative , the II Party had issued memorandurn dated 7-12-87 . Therefore , the mode of termination was as per the offer of appointment mentioned above . Therefore , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In these circumstances , the points to be decided in this case are :-

(i) " Whether the action of the Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya , IIT Campus, Chennai in terminating the services of Sri A.S. Ramanarayanan with effect from 8-11-99 is legal and justified?

( ii) " To what relief, the Petitioner is entitled?"

10. On behalf of the Respondent, it is argued that even in the appointment order , it is clearly stated that the postof bearer is only temporary and he must have known the fact that his work will be terminated at any time . Since the 1 Party was appointed as bearer in the hostel and there were only three students studying till 31-3-99 and there was no student in the sports hostel from 1-4-99, even the steps were taken by the II Party/Managementto revive the sports hostel but in vein and therefore , the 11 Party/ Management informed the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sankatan , New Delhi and the New Delhi office passed an order for closing the sports hostel with immediate effect . Therefore , the services of the I Party were terminated . Since it is purely on temporatory basis and wages were given by claculating the daily wages , the I Party was not eligible for any retrenchment benefits .

PointNo. 1 :

6. In this case, the Petitioner has examined himself as WWI and he has marked documents Ex . WI to W24 and on the side of the II Party/Management the Vice Principal was examined as MWI and marked only one document.

11. On behalf of the 1 Party, it is argued that the 1 Party has put in 12 long years of continuous service and hewas paid wages from school funds and not from hostel funds from 1990 and therefore, the action ofthe Respondent/ Management in keeping him as temporary for such long years is nothing but an arbitary and colourful exercise of powers and also to deprive the Petitioner from the privilage 7. The case of the 1 Party is that he has been appointed as a bearer from 7-12-87 in the hostel maintained 14401

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ.4, 1925

[ भाम - खण्ड 3(ii)]

and status of permanent workman and therefore , it is a clear caseofunfair labour practice. It is his further argument that when five persons were appointed for hostel namely one cook, one bearer, one masalchi , one LDC and one nurse were worked , after the closure of the sports hostel, the LDC& Nurse were continuedin service in other vidyalayas and the I Party/workman alonewtwminated from service. The II Party should have alsovoithined the service of the IParty in any ofthe schools wider the control of Regional Officewhile continuing the services oftwo other workmen . Terminating the services of the I Party Workman is a discriminatory and therefore , it is not vaild in law. But, on the other hand, the Respondent contended that though the LDC and Nurse are continued in service of other Vidyalayas, they were permanent employees and therefore, it cannot be equated for the I Party/Petitioner and as such , the Petitioner is no entitled to any relief.

age is 58years. The drivers developedweak or sub-normal eyesight or losttheir required vision'ont accumint of their occupation as drivers in the corporation. They are required to strain their eyesight every moment of the driving, keeping awatchful eye onthe realfor the bumps , bends and slopes, and to avoid all kinds of verticles on theway. It is this constant straintagiof eyes on the road which takes its inevitable toll oftheir vision. Walsoships that weakening of the eyesight is notan isolated phenomenon but a widespread risk to which those who take the employment as a driver expose themselves. Yet the Corporation treats their cases in the same manner andfashion as it treats the cases of other workmen who onaccount ofreasons not connected with the employment suffer from ill health or continued ill health. That by itselfis a discriminatory against the drivers and thus the Supreme Court evolving a scheme and giving the Respondent/Management directions and said after their incapacity to work only as drivers and are not rendered incapable of taking any other jobs ether in corporation or outside. Further the workman are at tin advanced age of their life and it would be difficult for them to get a suitable alternative employment outside and as such the Supreme Court observed that the relief made available under the scheme should not be such as would induce the workmen tofeign disability which in the ease ofdisability such the present one ie, the development of a defective eyesight " and formulated scheme for alternative accommodation for the drivers. In this case, the I Party/ Workman only on a reasonable and legitimate expectation that he would be absorbed in Group D-post, as given in the cases of those persons who had worked in the post prior to the I Party/Workman, he was working faithfully and loyally and without any remarks for all these years. Further, atthis later stage, ifhe has been terminated from service, he has become over aged and unfit for any employment in any other public or Govt . or private establishments and under such circumstances , the welfare measure is to be taken in favour of the Petitioner.

12. But, againthe counsel for the Petitioner argued that in the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 , it is clearly stated that if a workman had put in more than 480 days in 24 calendar months from the date ofhis joining, he shall be made permanent . Under such circumstances , the I Party/ Workman had put in more than twelve years ofcontinuous service and therefore , he is entitled to the benefits of the said Act, But, on behalf ofthe Respondent, it is contended that as per Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Confermant ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 , the Petitioner / Workman should be made permanent , since the Petitioner was appointed as a temporary, unless a person is appointed on regular basis , according to rules , there is no question of regularisation or service . Even the Supreme Court has held in number of decisions that ' if there was no sanctioned post in existence to which a workman said to have been appointed and assignment was an ad- hoc one , which anticipatedly spent itself found it is diffcult toenvisage for them, the status of workman and analogy of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act imparting the incidence of completion of240 days of work . The completion of 240 days work does not in law impart the right of regularisation and therefore, forargument sake, ifthe Court has come to a conclusion that he has worked for more than 12 years of continuous service , the I Party isnot entitled for any regularisation and therefore , his claim is to be rejected.

14. I much force in this contentiori because even though the Petutioner/Workman was appointed as a bearer on temporary basis , the action of the II Party/ Management in keeping him as a temporary for years together is nothing but an- arbitrary and colourful exercise . Further, it is the evidence of the Vice- Principal that there were about 58 schools at the beginning in the Chennai region under the control of KVS and in case of staff of Sankathan are transferable to any other schools and in case, ifthere is asurplus, the surplus will be accommodated inany one of the above schools . Similarly, if there is any shortage, staff will be transferredto that place . Under such circumstances, it cannot be said even in all the 58 schools there is no vacaricy to accommodate the I Party/Woritmian . It is clearly noted that even though the Petitioner was appointed on temporary basis , he has served more than twelve years in that post, and therefore, keeping him in the temporary status for more than twelve years is to deprive him the privilege and status of permanent workmen and 13. Again , on behalfof the PParty it is argued that the Petitioner was selected and included in the main panel ofthe post of LDC at serial ; No. 1 after examination and interview. Further , the Principal of the II Party/Management has also recommended the Petitioner for appointment to the post of LDC , it cannot be said merely because the hostel was closed , the Petitioner is not entitled for any regularisation . On the other hand, the II Party/Management ought to have appointed the Petitioner as LDC . Further epin the case , where drivers of readways buses developing defective eyesight after serving long number of years of service , the Supreme Court has held that "all of them are above 40 years ofage and their superannuation

09 /04-46 402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

therefore , it is a clear unfair labour practice within the meaning of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Even though , the witness of the Respondent/Management states that the Delhi authorities have restricted the appointment of LDC and also Group D appointment , the Respondent has not produced any document to show that the appointment ofLDC and Group D had been barred from the year 1999. It is also a fact that the Petitioner/ Workman was initially paid from the hostel funds and subsequently paid out of the school funds and it is also a fact that even though the Petitioner was appointed as temporary bearer in the sports hostel his services were utilisedby the school authorities for escorting the students to other places and also for the Group D post. Under such circumstances , I find there is no point in the contention of the Respondent that merely because his appointment was ternporary, regularisation should not be made to the Petitioner/Workman . It is clear from the evidence ofthe Vice-Principal that even prior to and after the termination of the Petitioner there was / is vacancy in Group D post in the KVS and also in the schools . Therefore , I think, it is not difficult for the 11 Party/Management to accommodate the I Party in any one of the schools or office . Therefore , I find thispoint in favour of the Petitioner .

Point No. 2 : ---

15. The next point to be decided in this case is to whatrelief the Petitioner is entitled?

Inview ofmy foregoing findings , I find the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement and as such I direct the Il Party/ Management the Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya, IIT campus , Chennai , to reinstate the I Party/ Petitioner Sri A.S.Ramanarayanan in Group D post with continuity of service and other attendant benefits. With regard to back wages, I find since the Petitioner/Workman was not in service from the year 1999 , the Petitioner Sri A.S.Ramanarayanan is entitled to only half back wages . No Costs .

16. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 8th December , 2003.)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined:--

For the I Party/Workman : Sri A.S.Ramanarayanan

Smt . S.Sasikala For the II Party /Management:

Documents Marked :-

Forthe I Party/ Workman :-

Ex . No. Date

Description

WI 07-12-87 Order of appointment issued to Petitioner W2 26-07-88 Certificate issued by Respondent permitting Petitioner, to attend interview W3 01-06-89 Representation given by Petitioner to regularise his service as Group D. W4 02-06-89 Service certificate issued by Respondent toPetitioner

W5 03-12-91 Xerox copy of the letter from Deputy Commissioner to Principal with regard

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)] to bonus

W6 10-11-95 Copy of Intimation given by Respondent to Petitioner regarding filling up of the postofLDC.

W7 19-06-97 Letter of Assistant Commissioner to Petitioner regarding recruitment to the postofLDC

W8 21-03-98 Letter from Petitioner to Commissioner ofRespondent Sangathan at New Delhi for hisAppointment as Group D W9 01-05-98 Office order issued by Principal to Petitioner

W10 03-05-98 Relieving order issuedby Respondent for Escorting the students for camp WI1 Series(2 ) 04-05-98 Office order issued by Principal W12 12-11-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Assistant Commissioner to Commissioner, KVS , New Delhi

W13 19-01-99 Xerox copy of the letter from Assistant Commissioner Chennai to KVS, New Delhi forwarding representation of Petitioner

W14 26-02-99 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner to Assistant Commissioner regarding appointment as Group D

W15 26-02-99 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Assistant Commissioner regarding appointment as Group D

W16 05-07-99 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Petitioner toAsstt. Commissioner , KVS, Chennai forappointment as GroupD W17 05-07-99 Copy of letter from Principal , KVS to Assistant Commissioner , KVS W18 06-09-99 Copy of office order issued by Principal , KVS

W19 01-10-99 Copy of relieving order issued to Petitioner

W20 04-10-99 Relieving order issued to Petitioner for attending Camp

W21 08-11-99 Office order issued by Respondent to Petitioner

W22 23-12-99 Copy of letter from Petitioner to Assistant Commissioner for appointment as Group D

W23 16-10-90 Xerox copy of the letter from Deputy Commissioner to Principal regarding wages clarification

W24 15-10-90 Xerox copy of the order issued by Deputy Commissioner to Principal for payment of wages from school funds For the 11 Party/Management :-

Ex.No. Date Description

MI 28-10-99 Xerox copy of the office order issued by KVS, New Delhi to II Party/Management 403

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

"Whether the action of the management in reducing the rank and initial basic wage of Sh . Jiwan Kumar Das from Special Grade to Grade- I Clerk through the disciplinary action is justified? If not , to what quantum ofpunishment proportionate to the gravity ofmisconduct be imposed upon him ?" का. आ. 210.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को.को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , । धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The case of the concerned workman according tothewritten statement submitted by the sponsoring union onhis befalf, in brief, is as follows :

[सं. एल. 20012/413/97- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

S.O. 210. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 92/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, 1 Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to management ofBCCL, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003 .

[No. L-20012/413/97- IR(C-I) ]

S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference under Sec . 10 ( 1 ) ( d)(2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reference No. 92 of 1998

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Moonidih Project of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen .

Present: SHRI B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer

Appearances :

: Shri H. Nath , Advocate .

Forthe Employers

Forthe Workman

: Shri S.C. Gour, Advocate .

Industry : Coal .

State : Jharkhand

dated, the 10th December , 2003

AWARD

It has been submitted by the sponsoring union that the concernedworkman , Jiwan Kumar Das was appointed in the year 1963 by the erstwhile National Coal Development Corporation, Ranchi with his first posting at Sudamdih Project . In the year 1964 he was transferred to Moonidih Project , a sister concern of N.C.D.C. They submitted further that said Moonidih Project was merged with Bharat Coking Coal Limited in the year 1976 and in the year 1980 the concerned workman was placed, under the direct control of superintendent of Mines , Moonidih, where he is still working . They submitted that the management issued a chargesheet against the concerned workman dated 16/ 17-4-94 for committing misconduct on the ground of falsification of records . The concerned workman denying the charges levelled against him submitted his reply . He in his reply disclosed that he was never custodian ofForm ' B ' Register of Moonidih Project and question of any falsification done by him , as alleged, is totally out of question . However , the management instead ofaccepting his reply decidedto hold departmental enquiry against him through Enquiry Officer . It has been submitted further that during the course of enquiry proceeding none of the charges was proved and also it never came to light who misappropriated the Form 'B' Register if at all it was done , as the concerned workman never was in custody of the said register. He further submitted that during enquiry proceeding it was established that the custodian of Form ' B ' Register, as per policy of the company, shall be head of the personnel executive of the unit/area , as the case may be . During the said enquiry proceeding the concerned workman produced the D. (P) Circular wherein it has been clearly mentioned that the personnel department executive is sole custodian of the Form ' B' Register . As such question of keeping Form 'B ' Register with him found baseless and motivated . Inspite of discussing all the facts which were proved during enquiry proceeding the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding him guilty of the charges . However , before inflicting punishment the disciplinary author.ty gave him three days time to submit his reply . He submitted that he gave detailed reply to the findings of the Enquiry Officer on 1-7-96 but without going through his reply and examining the papers the disciplinary authority passed the order of demotion dated 3-7-96 . As a result of the said order his rank from Special Grade to Grade - I Clerical was seriously affected and virtually he lost 50% By Order No. L-20012/413/97 - IR (C- I ) dated the 24th March , 1998 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofSub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :---

404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Points to be decided ;

4. "Whether the action of the management in reduning therank and initial basic wage of Sh. Jiwan Kumar Das: from Special gradato Graded clerk through the disciplinaryraction is justifiedUnot to what quantum of punishment proportionate to the gravity of misconduct be imposed upon himsh

Findingawith reaso

of his wages . He further submitted that on receipt of the said order of punishment which was not under the signature ofthe competent/appointing authority i.e. General Manager of the Area he made an Appeal to the Appellated Authority/G.M of the Area, but his appeal was not examined and even the same was not acknowledge . As a result he made another appeal to the Director (Personnel) , M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. on 13-8-96 but again no reply was received and for which he raised an industrial dispute before the A.L.C. (C ) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The concerned workman accordingly submitted his prayer to pass award directing the management to restore the grade and basic of the concerned workman which he was drawing prior to issue of the order .

5. It appears from the record that before taking up hearing on merit it was considered if domestic enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair , proper and in accordance with the principle ofnatural justice . In course ofhearing on preliminary point the management did not adduce any evidence, while the concerned workman was examined himself as witness in onder to substantiate his claim .

By order No. 26 dated 5-8-2003 it was decided that the domestic enquiry conducted against the concerned workman by the Enquiry Officer was fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice . Accordingly, at this stage there is ne scope to re - open that issue, Here the only point for consideration is whether the management has been able to establish the charge brought against the concerned workman .

6. It is admitted fact that the management issued charge- sheetagainst the concerned workman under clause 26-1-11 and clause 26-1-29 of the standing orders for committing misconduct by the concerned workman . The charge-sheet during hearing on preliminary point was marked as ext . M- 1 /4. The charge sheet speaks as follows :

4 3. The management , on the contrary, after filling written statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the concerned workman asserted in the written statement which was submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf. The management submitted that the charge- sheet, dated 16/ 17-3-94 was issued to the concerned workman for committing misconduct under clause 26-1-11 for theft , fraud and dishonesty in connection which company's business and also for clause 26-1-29 for wilful falsification , defacement or destruction of records of the Company . It has been alleged by the management that the concerned workman while maintaining Form ' B ' Register tampered the date of birth of B. R. Manjhi , Ex- Foreman Incharge in the Form ' B' . Register as 16-4-35 striking down the original date of birth recorded as 14-5-32 . They alleged that Sri Das tampered and defaced the original date of birth with malafide intention to favour B. R. Manjhi for extension of his superannuation age . Theydisclosed that over the said incident an enquiry was conducted against the concerned workman through Enquiry Officer and after due enquiry the charge levelled against the concerned workman was established beyond reasonable doubt and for which the Enquiry officer recommended for demotion of one grade i.e. from Special Grade to Grade- I with initial basicwhich was duly approved by the competent authority. They submitted that when the concerned workman raised industrial dispute before the A.L.C.( C) Dhanbad, the Agent , Moonidih Project vide letter dated 15-1-97 explained the facts of the case and prayed for closing the matter . They submitted that order of punishment of reduction of one grade cannot be said to be disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct committedby they concerned workman and for which there is no scope to say that the punishment inflicted upon the concerned workman was illegal , arbitrary and violated the principle of natural justice . In view of the facts and circumstances stated above , the management submitted that the prayer of the concerned workman is liable to be rejected

" 1. That , you have been posted in Moonidih Project and working in Personnel Deptt. and maintaining the Form ' B'Registers since 1981. It has been found that the date of birth of Sri B.R Manjhi Ex . Foreman Incharge as mentioned in old Form ' B ' Register of Moonidih Project, was originally 14-5-1932 but after verification of the Form 'B ' Register it has been detected that tampering has been made and the original date of birth has been defaced in such - an manner which is not reasonable and in that place date of birth has been inserted as 16-4-1935 . This alteration in the date of birth has been made not in line with the norms fixed for the same i.e cutting in Form 'B' Register should be made in such- a- manner that the original writing could be apparently read. But you have not followed this procedure and completely defaced the original insertion regarding date of birth of Shri B. R. Manjhi . You have also not brought the matter of alteration in date of birth to the knowledge of superior authority or the controlling officer , i . e Officer of Personnel Deptt. and supdt . or Mines/Manager .

405 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माष 4, 1925

[ भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

'It transpires from the enquiry proceeding papers thatthe concerned workman in response to the said charge- You also did not get their signature in the column where the alteration has been made . It apparently reflects that you have tampered and defaced the original date of birth inserted in the Form 'B' Register with malafide intention and with an intention to favour the workman concemed for. extension of his superannuation date under a conspiracy. It also indicate that you have done this intentionally and has concealed the facts. from your superiors with ulterior motive.Because of your above action Sri Manjhi could not be retired on superannuation on 14-5-1992 and continued in service and got undeserved. payment ofsalary upto 29-4-1993 . Shri Manjhi also exploited the situation and got himself medically unfit during the extended period of his service and claimed for the service of his son.

2. That, the date of birth of Sri Niranjan Chakraborty, Ex-Welder in Moonidih project as mentioned in Old Form ' B ' Register was originally 15-3-1932. but in the course of verification of From ' B ' Register, it has been found that the original insertion regarding date of birth of the aforesaid workman has been changed to 2-11-1939 and original one has been defaced and cutting has been made in such- a - manner which is completely unreadable . It has also been found that the matter regarding. alteration of age has not been brought to the knowledge of controlling Officer , i.e. Officer of Personnel Deptt . and Supdt. of Mines/Manager who are the statutory authority in respect of Form 'B' Register . It also manifests that the alteration ofage has been made with malafide intention by you to favour the concemed workman for extending the date of superannuation. It indicates your connivance with the concemed workman to unduly favour him . Because ofyour above action , Sri Niranjan Chakraborty could not be retired on superannuation on 15-3-1993 and continued in service and received the undeserved wages till 28-2-1994. Thus , the management sustained heavy financial loss because of your action as mentioned above .

sheet submitted his reply. In reply given by him he has categorically denied the charges brought against him . In para 6 of his reply he submitted that under direction ofthe superior and Competent Authority he started maintaining Form 'B' Register since 1981. He further submitted that under direction of the Supervising authority he started conducting the work ofpreparing new Form ' B' Register on the basis of old Form ' B ' Register . He disclosed that as per circular issued from the Headquarter under the signature of I.B. Pandey it was the responsibility of the Senior Personnel Officer to maintain and to keep Form ' B ' Register in his custody. Therefore , from his reply two things are coming into existence i.e it shows that he was entrusted to maintain the Form ' B ' Register as per direction of his superior authority and started preparing new Form ' B ' Register on the basis of old Form 'B ' Register and secondly that the senior Personnel Officer was the custodian of the said register . There is no dispute to hold that the date of birth of two workmen , namely B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakrabortywere interpolated in the Form ' B ' Register . It transpires that actual date of birth of B.R Manjhi in old Form 'B ' Register was recorded as 14-5-32 but after interpolation and defacing it the date ofbirth was recorded as 16-4-1935 . Again in the case of Niranjan Chakraborty hisdate ofbirth in the old Form ' B ' Register was recorded as15-3-32 but after its change it was recorded as 2-11-39 It transpires from the enquiry proceeding papers that the concernedworkman gave his statement before the Enquiry Officer. From his statement it transpires that under verbal direction of Sri M.M. Bhattacherjee, the then Supdt. of Mineshe started preparing new Form ' B' Register relying on the old Form ' B ' Register of N.C.D.C. He disclosed that in course of doing such work Niranjan Chakraborty and B.R. Manjhi came to him and produced matriculation certificate for changing of their date ofbirth. He disclosed that the certificate of B.R Manjhi was duly attested by the Administrative Officer, Moonidih project and Executive Engineer (E & M) , Moonidih Project . He submittedthat under verbal instruction of Sri A.K. Das , the then executive officer he interpolated the date of birth of Niranjan Chakraborty and B.R. Manjhi in the Form ' B ' Register in view of certificate produced by them.

3. *

26-1-11 Theft, fraud or dishonesty in connection with company's business orproperty, (Fraud and dishonesty in connection with company's business orproperty is relevant in this case ) .

He further disclosed that in doing so he struck down original date ofbirth recorded in old Form ' B ' Register.He further disclosed that in the year 1986 the senior Personnel Officer, Sri R.C. Srivastava took charge of Personnel section and kept the form 'B ' Register under his custody. As per circular issued by the Headquarter there is no dispute to hold that the Personnel Officer should be the custodian of Form ' B ' Register but simultaneously considering the statement ofthe concerned workman as well as considering his reply to the charge -sheet . I find no dispute to hold that he alsowas entrusted in maintaining Form ' B ' Register.. 26-1-29 Wilful falsification defacement and destruction ofpersonal records or any record of the Company . (Wilful falsification and defacement of records ofthe company is relevant in this case).

406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] It is also clear that under instruction of superior authority hestarted preparing new Form ' B ' Register with the help of old Form ' B ' Register. Therefore , according to the statement given by the concerned workman there is no dispute to hold that he personally struck down the original dateofbirth recorded in the old Form ' B ' Register in respect ofworkmen, B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakraborty and inserted new date of birth relying on the copy of matriculation certificate duly attested by the senior officials ofthe management . The concerned workman during his evidence admitted categorically that he changed the date ofbirth of B.R. Manjhi in Form ' B ' Register under specific direction of Senior Personnel Officer, Sri R.C. Srivastava . He however denied the fact of changing date of birth of Niranjan Chakraborty in Form ' B ' register. It is seen that against the order of demotion passed by the authority the concerned workman made an appeal before the Appellate Authority. In para 4 of his appeal he denied the fact of tampering and defacing the date of birth of B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakraborty in Form ' B' Register. He disclosed that he entered the date of birth of B. R. Manjhi only as per instruction of his controlling officer concerning the matriculation certificate duly attested by the colliery top officer. He categorically denied the fact about insertion of new date of birth of Niranjan Chakraborty in the Form 'B' Register. It is seen that the concerned workman has given contradictory statement from one place to other place. While in course of his evidence he disclosed that heonly inserted the new date of birth of B.R. Manjhi in the Form 'B ' Register under instruction of Sri R.C. Srivastava, beforeEnquiry Officer he disclosed that he made such change under verbal instruction of Sri A.K. Dey, Personnel Officer. In course of his evidence while he denied about changing ofdate of birth of Niranjan Chakraborty, in course of giving statement before Enquiry Officer he admitted the fact of changing his date of birth. It is clear from his statement that Sri R.C. Srivastava joined the Personnel Department in the year 1986, Sri A.K. Dey, Personnel Officer was his predecessor- in - office . Therefore , the claim ofthe concerned workman that under instruction of Sri R.C. Srivastava the date of birth of B.R. Manjhi which he changed in Form 'B ' Register finds no substantial ground. During enquiry proceeding the Enquiry Officer recorded the statement of R. C. Srivastava and J.C. Sharma. Iftheir statements are taken into consideration it exposes clearly that they did not give any instruction to the concerned workman to change the date of birth of B.R. Manjhi. and Niranjan Chakraborty in the Form ' B ' Register. There is no dispute to hold that original date of birth of B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakraborty in the Form ' B' Register were recorded as 14-5-32 and 15-3-32 and after change the said date of birth were re- written as 16-4-35 and 2-11-39 . If the statement of the concerned workman is taken into consideration there is no dispute to hold that he changed the date ofbirth of those two workmen in the Form ' B' Register prior to taking charge of R.C

Srivastava of the Personnel Department . It is fact that Sri R.C. Srivastava was the custodian of Form 'B' Register but it is not expected for the custodian to check out the old entries which were done prior to his joining in the Personnel Department as Senior Personnel Manager. It is the contention of the concerned workman that those two persons , B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakraborty came and produced the attested copies of their matriculation certificate and asked to record the date ofbirthrecorded in the copy ofthe matriculation certificate. The concerned workman was Senior Clerk posted in the Personnel Department and he was entrusted with maintenance of Form ' B' Register. No evidence is forthcoming to the effect that he was authorised to change the date of birth striking out the old date of birth of those two workmen without prior approval and knowledge of theSuperior authority. Therefore, the concerned workman cannot avoid his responsibility to explain under which circumstances he changed the said date of birth of those two workmen. The plea taken by him that under instruction ofA.K. Dey he did so is not at all believable in view of his contrary statement . Form ' B' Register is to be considered as statutory register under the Mines Act and all care and cautions are required to be taken for its maintenance. I have carefully considered all the material papers and documents and I have failed to find out any material evidence relying on which there is scope to say that being subordinate staff he was practically forced to change the date of birth of those two workmen under direction ofthe superior officers . It is clear that such change was made before 1986 i.e. before joining of Sri R.C. Srivastava. Ifthe contention of the concerned workman is taken into consideration that under verbal direction of Sri A.K. Dey, Personnel Officer he changed the date of birth in the Form 'B' Register, no explanation on his part is forthcoming why he did not bring the matter to the notice of Sri R.C. Srivastava while he joined in the Personnel Department as Senior Personnel Officer. It is seen from the paper marked Ext. M- 1 / 17 that Niranjan Chakraborty , Asstt. Foreman, Moonidih Project, was charge - sheeted for submitting false matriculation certificate and he was found guilty in course ofdomestic enquiry . Therefore, it is clear that Niranjan Chakraborty on the basis of fake matriculation certificate influenced the concerned workman to change his date of birth in the Form 'B' Register and the concerned workman without prior permission from the senior authority changed hisdate ofbirth in the same . Actually this serious fault in the matter of interpolation of date of birth of Niranjan Chakraborty was detected by Sri P. Maharaj , Personnel Mariager, Moonidih Area in the year 1994 and thereafter ' appropriate steps were taken against the concerned workman. It is the specific allegation of the management that as per date of birth recorded in old Form 'B' Register B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakraborty were due to be superannuated in the year 1992 but due to interpolation of their date of birth they remained in service beyond the 407

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

का. आ. 211.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.का.को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 142/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 कीप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 20012/334/96- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2003 exact date of their superannuation and for which the management sustained serious financial loss and it was sodone only for the illegal act committed by the concerned workman in connivance with those two workmen . The concerned workman always claimed himselfto be innocent . Hesubmitted that the management illegally issued false charge- sheet against him . Accordingly onus shifts on him to prove his innocence and to show falsity of charge brought against him by the management . Excepting implicating the names of some officers the concerned workman has failed to produce an iota of evidence relying on which his innocence could be proved . I have already discussed above that creditability of the claim of the concerned workman about implication of two officers did not find any basis in view of his contrary statement given at different places . No satisfactory explanation is forthcoming why he kept himself mum for such a long period about insertion of new date of birth striking down and defacement of date of birth of those two workmen , namely , B.R. Manjhi and Niranjan Chakraborty.

S.O. 211. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 142/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to management ofBCEL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003 .

[No. L-20012/334/96- IR (C- 1 )]

S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Sec . 10( 1 )( d)(2.A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 142 of 1997.

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Area of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. Accordingly after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances I hold that the management has been able to establish the charge which has been brought against the concerned workman . I have carefully considered theOffice Order being No. BCCL/ OM/ 88 /6 (A) / 213 dated 24-9-88 issued by O.M. Department ofB.C.C.L. in the matter of delegation of power to Dy . General Managers/ AM (T) Services/Agents and Colliery Managers and I find no dispute to hold that the Project Officer/Agent, Moonidih Project was very much competent to issue the order of punishment against the concerned workman . Accordingly, there is no scope to say that by issuing an orderofpunishment against the concerned workman dated 3/4-7-1996 (Ext . M- 1/25) the Project Officer committed any illegality.

AND

Their Workmen .

Present : SHRI B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer

Appearances:

: Shri S.N. Sinha, Advocate .

For the Management

For the Workman/Union :

7. Now , the point for consideration is if the concerned workman is entitled to get any benefit as per Section 11 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act . Section 11 -A has empowered the Tribunal to give appropriate relief in case of discharge or dismissal of a workman . Here in the instant case the concerned workman was neither discharged nor dismissed from his service, he was only demoted. Therefore , there is no scope to invoke the provision of Sec . 11 -A with a view to take lenient view in the matter of his punishment .

Shri Raghunandan Rai , Working President.

Industry: Coal

State : Jharkhand

In view of the discussions made above , the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

Dated, the 11th December, 2003 .

8. In the result, the following award is rendered-

AWARD

The action of the management in reducing the rank and initial basic wage of Sh . Jiwan Kumar Das from Special Grade to Grade- I through the disciplinary action is justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

By Order No. L- 20012/ 334/96- IR (Coal- I ) dated the 25thNovember , 1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) ofSub-section ( 1 ) and Sub-section (2A) ofthe B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii)) Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

Shri Raghunandan Rai as Pump Supervisor in T& S Grade- Aand denial to pay wages w.e.f. 9-11-1995 in that job is justified? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled?"

Finding with reasons:

"Whether the action of the management Bhowra (S) Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in denial to regularise Shri Raghunandan Rai as Pump Supervisor in T & S Grade-A and denial to pay wages w.e.f. 9-11-1995 in thatjob is justified ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

5. 1t transpires from the record that the concerned workman in order to substantiate his claim examined himselfas WW-1 . The management, on the contrary , also with a viewto establish their claim examined one witness asMW- 1 .

2. The case of the concerned workman according to the written statement submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf, in brief, is as follows :

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman was a Pump Operator in Bhowra (S) Colliery and byletter No. BH ( S)/95 / 11 /853 dated 13-7-95 he was advised by the Manager of the said colliery to do the job of Pump Supervisor and as per order of the manager of the said colliery the concerned workman started working as Pump Supervisor and discharged his duties to the satisfaction of his superiors. They submitted that as per Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and sub - rule 7.2 ofthe Standing orders aworkman who has completed 190 days underground work in the same job should be regularised in the same designation and grade . They alleged that inspite of discharging his duty continuously as Pump Supervisor the management refused to regularise him as Pump supervisior in Technical & Supervisory Grade ' A ' and for which he raised an industrial dispute before A.L.C. ( C) for conciliationwhich ultimately referred to this Tribunal .

Considering the pleadings of both sides and also considering the evidence of WW - 1 and MW- 1 I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workman was a Pump Operator under the management . It is the contention of the concerned workman that the management by order dated 13-7-95 instructed him to discharge his duty as Pump Supervisorand his duty hours was fixed form 7 AM to 3 PM. Heidisclosed that since that date he is working as Pump Supervisior . He further disclosed that on 7-11-95 he submitted a petition to the Project Officer with a prayer for hisregularisation of his service as Pump Supervisor in Technical & Supervisory Grade ' A' . The copy of such petition during his evidence was marked Ext . W- 1 . The concerned workman relied on the order issued by the Colliery Manager dated 13-7-95 in support of his claim which during his evidence was marked Ext . W-2 . This witness during his cross - examination admitted that as he was not aware ifthere was any post ofPump Supervisory in Technical & Supervisory Grade ' A' he submitted an application dated 15-11-95 addressed to the management by which he requested to create the post Pump supervisor though there was no such post under NCWA. The said petition during his evidence was marked Ext . M- 1 . It is also admitted fact that the concerned workman has been placed in Category - IV as Pump Operator and drawing his wages to that effect . MW- 1 during his evidence categorically submitted that there was no nomenclature as Pump Supervisor according to N.C.W.A. which the concerned workman has placed finds no basis for his fulfilment . Hedisclosed that Pump Operator who operates pump below 35 H.P. enjoys Category - II while above 35 H.P..enjoys Category- III . However , as per service link upgradation the concerned workman is enjoying category- IV. The Concerned workman relied on the letter issued by the Manager , Bhowra Colliery (Marked Ext . W- 2) in support of his claim . Now , let us consider the contents of the said letter which speaks as follows :

3. The management , on the contrary , after filing written statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement on behalf ofthe concerned workman . They submitted that the concerned workman was asked to attend his Ist shift duty daily with a view to get the pumps properly maintained and run so that the pumps are operated without trouble in all the shifts vide a letter No. BH ( S)/95 / 11 / 858 dated 13-7-95 . They disclosed that during the relevant period there was frequent break down of the pumps in his shift causing inefficient pumping of the mine. Accordingly he was specifically instructed to look into thejob of Pump break down etc. for a small span ofperiod, but he did not obey such instructions and reported absenting for which action was taken against him . They further disclosed that as per job nomenclature provided in N.C.W.A. there is no post like pump Supervisor in Technical & Supervisory Grade ' A' and in practice also there is no such post exists . Accordingly, the claim of the concerned workman for his regularisation as Pump Supervisor is a far from cry and for which he is not entitled to get any benefit accordingly, they submitted prayer to pass order rejecting the claim ofthe concerned workman .

"Forbetter supervision and efficient running of the pump , you have to be in Ist shift daily and get the pump properly maintained and run so that the pumps are run without trouble in all the shifts . " Points to be decided:

4. "Whether the action of the management of Bhowra ( S) Colliery of M/s . BCCL in denial to regularise

Therefore, from this letter 1 do not find any whisper to this effect that the concerned workman was promoted to the post of Pump Supervisor . For better supervision 409

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Dispute betweenthe employers in relation to management of Gulf Air Company , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2003.

[No. L- 11012/41 /2001 - IR (C-I)]

S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , AT MUMBAI

Present

Shri Justice S.C. Pandey,

PresidingOfficer

Reference No. CGIT 10 of2003 .

Parties: GulfAir Company. AND

Their Workmen.

and efficient running of pump does not mean or interpret thatthe concerned workman was promoted to the post of Pump supervisor. As per N.C.W.A. there in no post of Pump Supervisor under Technical & Supervisory Grade 'A' in respect of which the concerned workman has placed his demand . Therefore , onus shifts on the concerned workman to establish that the post of Pump Supervisor in Technical & Supervisory Grade ' A' is very much in existence and inspite of his rendering service in the said post he has been deprived of by the management to get his service regularised in the said post . No evidence on the part of the concerned workman is forthcoming that as Pump Operator he started drawing his wages in view of the order issued by the management . On the contrary, it has been admitted by the concerned workman that he used to draw wages in Category- IV as Pump Operator . The Post ofTechnical & Supervisory Grade 'A' is a cadre post and N.C.W.A. has made out a clear guidelines how a vacant post under the Cadre Scheme is to be filled up . As there is no such post of Technical & Supervisory Grade 'A ' for the Pump supervisor there is no scope to fulfill that post .

Appearences :

: Shri G. Desai , Advocate

For the Management

For the Workman

: No Appearance

: Maharashtra

State

I have carefully considered all the materials on the record and 1 find no hesitation to say that the claim of the concerned workman to get his promotion as Pump Supervisor in Technical & Supervisory Grade 'A' finds no basis at all and for which he is not entitled to any relief.

6. In the result , the following award is rendered-

Mumbai , dated this the 17th day ofDecember , 2003 AWARD

The action ofthe management of Bhowra (S) colliery ofM/ S . BCCL in denial to regularise Shri Raghunandan Rai as Pump Supervisor in Technical & Supervisory Grade 'A' and denial to pay wages w.e.f. 9-11-1995 in that job is justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2003

1. This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause (d ) of sub-scetion 1 of Section 10 and sub -section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (the Act for short ) for adjudication upon the following question in industrial dispute between Gulf Air Company (the Company for short) and its workmen represented by the Gulf Air Employees Association , Maroshi Road, Andheri East , Mumbai (the Union for short).

"क्यागल्फ इम्पलाइज एसोसिएशन की निम्नलिखित माँग उचित एवंन्याय संगत है तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र है ?:

1. कि ऐसे ट्रेनीज जो अपनी ट्रेनिंग अवधि पूरी कर चुके हैं को स्थाई रूप से नियुक्त किया जाये तथा इन्हें स्थाई कर्मकारों के समरूप वेतन दिया जाये;

का. आ. 212.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गल्फ एअर कम्पनी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण । मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 11012/41/2001- आई.आर . ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

2. कि समझौता प्रक्रिया अथवा कोर्ट मामलों में हाजरी के लिए यूनियन के दो प्रतिनिधियों को ड्यूटी पर माना जाये;

New Delhi , the 31st December, 2003

3. कि किसी भी विभाग की स्टाफ संख्या बढ़ाने एवं कम करने, कार्य के घंटों, रेस्ट की अवधि के बढ़ाने- घटाने एवं औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के उपबंध IV में दिए गए किसी भी कार्य में बदलाव करने से पूर्व धारा १क के अंतर्गत नोटिस जारी किया जाये । "

S.O. 212. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 10/03 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court 1, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial

109650418 410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

1 2

4. Kahanpur

163

Jalandhar

[No. S- 38013/03/2004- SS. I K.C. JAIN , Director

नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी, 2004

2. This Tribunal finds that on 26-9-2003 the union did not appear though , a registered letter was sent as well the notice was handed over to the employer for service to union for appearanice on 17-11-2003 . The union was served through registered post . Another date was given for 17-12-2003 . On 17-12-2003 the management stated that service was affected for appearance on 17-11-2003 . A fresh registered notice for appearance for 17-12-2003 appears to have been served on the registered address . No body has appeared on 17-12-2003 . It appears that union is not interested in pursuing the dispute.

3. The result is that this reference to answered by saying that there is no existing industria ! dispute between the parties . The reference is rejected.

का. आ. 214.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 फरवरी, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय 5 और 6 [धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2004

" जिला एवं तहसील अमृतसर में राजस्व ग्राम बालकलां हदबस्त संख्या 340" ।

[संख्या. एस-38013/01/04-एस.एस.- 1 ] के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

NewDelhi , the 7th January, 2004 नई का..आ. 213.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उपधारा (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 फरवरी, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय 5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

क्र. राजस्व ग्राम

हदबस्त

सं. का नाम

संख्या

तहसील एवं जिला

1. धोगरी

164

जालन्धर

2. राओवाली

205

जालन्धर

S.O. 214. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapters V and VI [except sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :-

163

3. रियापुर/ रसूलपुर

जालन्धर

4. काहनपुर

" The Revenue Village Balkalan , Had Bast No. 340 in Tehsil and District Amritsar . "

163

जालन्धर

[सं. एस-38013/03/04- एस.एस.- 1 ]

[No. S- 38013/01 /2004- SS . I ] K.C. JAIN, Director के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2004

New Delhi, the 7th January, 2004

का. आ. 215.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 फरवरी, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय 5 और 6 [धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या तहसील एवं जिला S.O. 213. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapters V and VI [ except sub - section ( i) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :-

S. Name of

HadBast Tehsiland

1. हुसैनपुरा

No. Revenue Village

No.

District

लुधियाना

2. कादियां

1 . Dhogri

1. महालरख

164

Jalandhar

लुधियाना लुधियाना

2. Raowali

205

Jalandhar

163

3. Riapur/Rasoolpur

Jalandhar

[संख्या.एस-38013/02/04- एस.एस.- 1 ] के. सी. जैन, निदेशक जनवर

411

भारत का राजपत्र

[भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th January , 2004

सूची 'मेंमें क्रमक्रम संख्यासंख्या 1818 औरऔर क्रमक्रम संख्यासंख्या सेसे संबंधित कॉलम I और II के अन्तर्गत प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापित किया जाएगा,

नामतः :- 1

" गवर्नमेंट पॉलीटेक्नीक, भुज

" 18 तकनीकी परीक्षा बोर्ड,

2/3 डॉ० जीवराज मेहता भवन, गांधी नगर: 382070 मुजरात ) में खनन इंजीनियरिंग में

[फा. संख्या एस -62012/01 /92-3 -62012 /01 / 92 - आईएसएच- II ] S.O. 215. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section I of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Governmen hereby appoints the Ist February , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapters V and VI [ except sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force of the said Act shaft come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely

बृज मोहन, अवर सचिवं

Tehsil and District

Name of Revenue

Had 은 BastNo.

Village

Ludhiana

1. Hussainpura

2. Kadian

Ludhiana

3.Mahalrakh

STIR SEMO S टिप्पणी: -23 सितम्बर, 1963 की अधिसूचना संख्या सां.आ. 2795 के द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र में मुख्य अधिसूचना प्रकाशित की गई थी तथा इसमें पीछे 9 फरवरी , 2002 की अधिसूचना संख्या सां.आ. 423 के द्वारा संशोधन किया गया।

spinn New Delhi ,the 14th January , 2004 [No. S-38013 /02/2004- SS . I ] KCJAIN, Director

(उत्प्रवास विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2004

80.217 . pursuance of the proviso to Regulation 17 of the Metalliferous Mines Regulations , 1961 , the Central Govemment hereby makes the following further amendments in the erstwhile Ministry of Labour and Employment's notification number S.O. 2795 dated the 23rd September, 1963 namely-

का. आ. 216.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, उत्प्रवास अधिनियम, 1983 ( 1983का 31 ) की धारा -3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्रम मंत्रालय में केन्द्रीय सचिवालय सेवा संवर्ग के अवर सचिव ( इन - सीटू) श्री सी० एम ० शर्मा को 15 दिसम्बर, 2003 ( पूर्वाहन ) से उत्प्रवास संरक्षी -11 , चेन्नई के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[ संख्या. एस-11011/01/2003 - उप्प्रवास ]

In the Table appended to the said notification , under the heading " INDIA " in the sub- heading " ( List of Institutions and authorities awarding Degree/Diploma in Mining , after a full time course of study) " , for serial number 18 and the entries under columns I and 11 relating to said serial number, the following shall be substituted, namely

अशोली चलाई, अवर सचिव

(Emigration Division )

New Delhi , the 7th January , 2004.

Diploma in Mining

Engineering at Govern- ment Polytechnic , Bhuj "

"18 Technical Examinations Board, 2/3, Dr. Jivraj Mehta Bhawan , Gandhi Nagar- 382010 ( Gujarat)

[File No. S-62012/ 01 /92 - ISH - II ] S.O. 216. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3. Sub - section ( 1 ) of the Emigration Act , 1983 (31 of 1983 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shrl C.M. Sharma . Under Secretary ( in - situ ) of the CSS cadre of Ministry of Labour , as Protector of Emigrants - 11 , Chennai with effect from 15th December, 2003 ( Forehoon ) .

BRAJ MOHAN , Under Secy .

[No. S- 11011/01/ 2003 -Emig. ]

ASHOLI CHALAI , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 14 जनवरी , 2004,

Footnote : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India vide notification number S.O.2795 dated the 23rd September , 1963 and lastly amended vide notification number 5.0. 423 dated 9th February, 2002 . S.O.

Auta noitsoftta

:.:

नई दिल्ली, 14 जनवरी , 2004 काः आ. 217. धातुमय खान विनियम 1961 के विनियम 17 के परन्तुक के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा पूर्ववर्ती श्रम व रोजगार मंत्रालय के दिनांक 23 सितम्बर , 1963 की अधिसूचना संख्या सां. आ. 2795 में. आगे विस्तलिखित, संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्

उक्त अधिसूचना के साथ संलग्न सारणी में शीर्षक " भारत " के अन्तःांत उप- शीर्ष ( " पूर्णकालिक अध्ययन पाठ्यक्रम के पश्चात् जनन विषय में डिग्री व डिप्लोमा प्रदान करने वाले संस्थानों व प्राधिकारियों की

का. आ. 218.- कोयला खान विनियम , 1957 के विनियम 17 के परन्तुक के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन श्रम घेणार मंत्रालय के दिनांक 28 जून, 1961 की अधिसूचना संख्खा हो. आ. 1599 में आगे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

10961/94-18 412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 24, 2004/MAGHA 4 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] उक्त अधिसूचना के साथ संलग्न सारणी में, शीर्षक " भारत " के अन्तर्गत उप- शीर्ष में " खनन विषयों में डिग्री व डिप्लोमा प्रदान करने वाले संस्थानों व प्राधिकारियों की सूची " मद 17 और उससे संबंधित खण्ड । और ।। के अन्तर्गत प्रविष्टियों के पश्चात्निम्नलिखित मद तथा प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी, अर्थात्:-

का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के उपबंधोंके अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2127 दिनांक 9-7-2003 द्वारा खनिज तेल ( कच्चा तेल ) , मोटर और विमानन स्पिरिट , डीजल तेल, मिट्टी का तेल , ईंधन तेल विविध हाइड्रोकार्बन तेल और उनके मिश्रण जिनमें सिंथेटिक तेल और इसी प्रकार के तेल शामिल हैं के निर्माण या उत्पादन में लगे उद्योग में सेवाओं में हैं, जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 26 में शामिल हैं , को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 16-7-2003 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा जित किया था;

" 17 टेक्नीकल एक्जामीनेशन्स बोर्ड , 2/3 डॉ. जीवराज मेहता भवन, गांधी नगर-382010 ( गुजरात ) "

" गवर्नमेंट पॉलीटेक्नीक, भुज मेंमाइनिंग इंजीनियरिंग (खनन अभियांत्रिकी ) में डिप्लोमा"

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है ;

[फा. संख्या एस-62012/ 01 /92- आईएसएच -111

बृज मोहन, अवर सचिव

टिप्पणी: - 28 जून , 1961 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ.

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड (vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 16-1-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है । 1599 के संदर्भ में मुख्य नियमावली भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित की गई थी तथा इसमें अंतिम संशोधन 9 फरवरी, 2002 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 424 के माध्यम से किया गया ।

[ संख्या एस-11017/6/97- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] New Delhi , the 14th January , 2004

जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

NewDelhi , the 15th January , 2004 S.O. 218. In pursuance of the proviso to Regulations 17 of the Coal Mines Regulations , 1957 , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the erstwhile Ministry of Labour and Employment's notification number S.O. 1599 , dated the 28th Jure. 1961 namely:---

In the Table appended to the said notificattion , under the heading " INDIA " in the sub -heading " (List of Institutions and authorities awarding Degree/Diplome in Mining) for serial number 17 and the entries under columns I and II relating to said serial number, the following shall be substituted, namely :

"Diploma in Mining Engineering at Govern- mentPolytechnic , Bhuj "

S.O. 219. - Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause ( vi) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 2127 dated 9-7-2003 the services in the Industry engaged in manufacture or production of Mineral Oil (crude oil) motor and aviation spirit, diesel oil , Kerosene oil , fuel oil, diverse hydrocarbon oil and their blends including Synthetic fuels , Lubricating oil and like which is covered by item 26 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 16th July, 2003.

17 Technical Examinations Board , 2: 3 , Dr. Jivraj Mehta Bhawar . Gandhi Nagar- 382010 Gujarat )"

[File No. S -62012/ 1 / 92-1SH - 11 ]

Andwhereas , the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

BRAJ MOHAN , Under Secy .

Footnote :--The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India vide notification number S.O. 1599 dated the 28th June , 1961 and lastly amended vide notification number S.O. 424 dated 9th February , 2002 .

नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2004

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred ! by the provisio to sub- clause (vi) of clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Govemment hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act for a period ofsix months from the 16th January, 2004.

[No. S - 11017/6/97- IR(PL)] का. आ. 219.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर किलोकहित में ऐसा करना अपे...त था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947

J.P. PATI , Jt . Secy.

413 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 24, 2004/माघ 4, 1925

New Delhi, the 16th January , 2004 नई दिल्ली, 16 जनवरी , 2004

S.O. 220.- Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Limited at Mysore (Karnataka) and Salboni ( West Bengal ) which is covered by item 25 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .

का. आ. 220.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर किलोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित है कि भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक नोट मुद्रण लिमिटेड, मैसूर ( कर्नाटक ) एवं सालबोनी ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिकविवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि25 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है , उक्त अधिनियमके प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए ।

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - clause (vi ) of clause ( n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industryto be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act fora period of six months .

अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[No. S- 11017/2/96- IR(PL) ] [संख्या एस-11017/2/96- आई.आर. ( पी.एल. ) ]

J.P. PATI , Jt . Secy.

जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

1 Printed by the Manager, Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .