This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं०डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. No. DL (N ) 04/0007/2003-05 भारतको राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 11 ]

नई दिल्ली , मार्च 7 - मार्च 13, 2004, शनिवार/फाल्गुन 17 - फाल्गुन 23, 1925

No. 11] NEW DELHI, MARCH 7 - MARCH 13, 2004, SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 17-PHALGUNA23, 1925 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3 - उप- खण्ड ( ii ) PART II- Section 3 Sub- section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

गृह मंत्रालय (एफ.एफ. आर . प्रभाग) नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2004

का. आ. 562.-विस्थापित व्यक्ति ( प्रतिकर तथा पुनर्वास) अधिनियम , 1954 (1954 का 44 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्‌द्वारा गृह मंत्रालय, स्वतंत्रता सेनानी एवं पुनर्वास प्रभाग के अवर सचिव श्री वी. के. सेठी को उक्त अधिनियम के द्वारा अथवा उसके अधीन बंदोबस्त अधिकारी को सौंपे गए कार्यों का निष्पादन करने के उद्देश्य से बंदोबस्त अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[ संख्या 1 ( 1 ) /2004-आर. एंड एस ओ. ] प्रवीर पाण्डेय , उप सचिव MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (FFRDivision)

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2004 S. O. 562. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act , 1954 (44 of 1954), 689 GI /2003

(1023)

the Central Government hereby appoints Shri V. K. Sethi , Under Secretary in the Ministry ofHome Affairs , Freedom Fighters and Rehabilitation Division as Settlement Officer for the purpose of performing the functions assigned to a SettlementOfficer by or under the saidAct.

[No. 1 ( 1 )/2004-R&SO] PRAVIR PANDEY, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी, 2004

का. आ. 563.-विस्थापित व्यक्ति ( प्रतिकर तथा पुनर्वास) अधिनियम, 1954 ( 1954 का 44 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्‌द्वारा गृह मंत्रालय , स्वतंत्रतासेनानी एवं पुनर्वास प्रभाग के अवर सचिव श्री पी. के. कौल को उक्त अधिनियम के द्वारा अथवा उसके अधीन बंदोबस्त आयुक्त को सौंपे गए कार्यों का निष्पादन करने के उद्देश्य से बंदोबस्त आयुक्त के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

2. इसके द्वारा दिनांक19 मार्च , 2001 की अधिसूचना संख्या 1 (2 )/ 99- बंदोबस्त का अधिक्रमण किया जाता है ।

[सं. 1 ( 1 )/2004- आर. एंड एस ओ. ] प्रवीर पाण्डेय, उप सचिव PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

1024

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2004

S. O. 563. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act , 1954 (44 of 1954) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri P. K. Kaul , Under Secretary in the Ministry ofHome Affairs , Freedom Fighters and Rehabilitation Division as Settlement Commissioner for the purpose of performing the functions assigned to a Settlement Commissioner by or under the said Act .

2. This supersedes Notification No. 1 (2)/99- Settlement dated the 19th March, 2001 .

[No. 1 ( 1 )/2004 -R& SO] PRAVIR PANDEY, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2004

का. आ. 564.-विस्थापित व्यक्ति ( प्रतिकर तथा पुनर्वास ) अधिनियम, 1954 ( 1954 का 44 ) की धारा 34 की उप - धारा 2 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, में, डा. के. एस. सुगतन, मुख्य बन्दोबस्त आयुक्त, एत‌द्वारा गृह मंत्रालय, स्वतंत्रता सेनानी एवं पुनर्वास प्रभाग में अवर सचिव, श्री पी. के कोल, जिन्हें दिनांक 24-2-2004 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के तहत बन्देबस्त आयुक्त के रूप में नियुक्त किया गया है , को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 23 और 24 के तहत शक्तियां तथा इन धाराओं के तहत अपीलें सुनने और पुनरीक्षण करने के प्रयोजन से शक्तियां सौंपता हूं। 2. इसके द्वारा दिनांक 19 मार्च, 2001 की अधिसूचना संख्या 1 (2)/99 - बंदोबस्तका अधिक्रमण किया जाता है ।

[सं. 1 ( 1 )/2004- आर. एंड एस ओ. ] डा० के ० एस ० सुगतन, मुख्य बन्दोबस्त आयुक्त New Delhi , the 25th February, 2004

S. O. 564. In exercise of the powers conferred by subject on 2 of Section 34 of the Displaced Persons (Conversation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 (44 of 1954 ) , I. Di. . S Sugathan, Chicf Settelment Commissioner, hereby delegate Shri P. K. Kaul , Under Secretary in the Ministry of Fine Affairs . Freedom Fighters and Rehabilitation Division who has been appointed as Settlement Commissioner vide Notification of even number dated the 24th February , 2004 , the powers under Section 23 & 24 of the said Act for the purpose of hearing appeals and revisions under these Sections .

2. This supersedes Notification No. 1 ( 2 )/ 99 .. Sct.lement dated the 19th March , 2001 .

[No. 1 ( 1 ) /2004 -R&SO ] DR. K. S. SUGATHAN , Chicf Settlement Commissioner

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्व विभाग )

(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2004

(आयकर )

का. आ. 565.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके

नाम केसामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था" श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

(i ) अधिसूचितं संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख- रखाव करेगी ;

(ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन प्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों की वार्षिक रिटर्न प्रत्येक 31 मई को अथवा उसे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिकअनुसंधान विभाग, टेक्नालॉजी भवन,न्यूमहरौली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;

(iii ) अधिसूचित संगठन केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10 मिडिलटन रो , पांचवा तल , कलकत्ता-700071 ( ख) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा (ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगी । क्रम सं. अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम अवधिजिसके 'लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

1-4-2002 सें

31-3-2005 1. मैसर्स आई टी सी संगीत रिसर्च एकेडमी, 1 , नेताजी सुभाष चन्द बोस रोड, टॉलीगंज , कोलकाता -700040

टिप्पणी:- ( i ) उपरोक्त शर्त ( i ) " संघ " के रूप में श्रेणीबद्ध संगठन पर लागू नहीं होगी।

( ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र की तीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी । [अधिसूचना सं. 64/2004/फा. सं. 203/101 /2002-आयकर नि.- II ] MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.- II ) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi, the 24th February, 2004

INCOME TAX

S. O. 565. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has 1025

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

कार्यालय : आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क आयुक्तालय: जयपुर-प्रथम

जयपुर, 27 फरवरी , 2004

सं. : 01- सीमा शुल्क ( एन टी) 2004 been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below , for the purpose of clause (ii) of Sub- Sec tion ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act , 1961 , rend with Rule 6 of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 under the category " Institution " subject to the following conditions:-

सीमा शुल्क

(i) The notified organization shall maintain separate books of accounts for its research activities;

(ii) The notified organization shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of Sciem ific & Industrial Research, ' Technology Bhawan' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi- 110016 for every financial year on or before 31st May of each year;

का. आ. 566. सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 152 के खण्ड ( ए ) के तहत भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94 सीमा शुल्क ( एन टी ) दिनांक प्रथम जुलाई, 1994 के अन्तर्गत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं , जे. चतुर्वेदी, आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, जयपुर- प्रथम एतद्वारा, शतप्रतिशत ई.ओ.यू. स्थापित करने के उद्देश्य से राजस्थान राज्य के जयपुर जिले में स्थित रीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, झोटवाडा विस्तार ( सरना डूंगर ) , फेज- द्वितीय , जयपुर को भण्डारण स्टेशन ( वेयर हाउसिंग स्टेशन) घोषित करता हूँ।

[फा. सं.: पंचम( 16 ) ईओयू/30/2003 ] जे. चतुर्वेदी , आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR- I Jaipur, the 27th February, 2004 No. 01-CUS (NT) 2004 CUSTOMS

(ii) The notified organization shall submit , on behalf of the Central Government , to (a ) the Director General of Income-tax (Exemptions ) , 10Middi etonRow, 5th Floor , Calcutta -700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, and (c) the Commissioner of Income - tax/ Director of Income - tax (Exemptic ns ) having jurisdiction over the organisation , on or before the 31st October each year, a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of Income - tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income -tax to the designated assessing officer.

S. No. Name of the organisati on approved

S. O. 566. In exercise of the powers conferred by Notification No. 33 /94-Customs (NT), dated the 1st July , 1994 , by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi , issued under clause (a) of Section 152 of Customs Act , 1962. I , J. Chaturvedi , Commissioner of Central Excise , Jaipur - I , hereby declare , RIICO Industrial Area, Jhotwara Extension (Sarna Doongar ) Phase - II , Jaipur, District Jaipur, in the State of Rajasthan to bewarehousing station under Section 9 the Customs Act , 1962 for the purpose of setting up 100 % E.O.U.

Period for which

notification is

effective

1-4-2002 to 31-3-2005

1. M/sITC Sangeet Research. Academy, 1 , Netaji Sub has Ch. Bose Road, Tollygunge , Kolkata - 700040

[C. No. V( 16) EOU /30/2003 ] J. CHATURVEDI , Commissioner (आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग) नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी , 2004 Notes : ( i) Condition ( i ) above will not apply to the organization categorized as Association " .

का. आ. 567.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर एतद्वारा घोपणा करती है कि बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 की धारा 15 की उपधारा (1 ) के उपबंध, आईसीआईसीआई बैंक पर लागू नहीं होंगे , जहां तक उसका संबंध वर्ष 2003-2004 से 2007-2008 तक के लिए आस्थगित राजस्व व्यय के रूप में मानी जा रही समयपूर्व सेवानिवृत्ति विकल्प योजना से संबद्ध व्यय माने जाने का संबंध है । (ii) The notified organisation is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Comr,vissioner of Income - tax/ Director of Income- tax (Exemptions) havingja risdiction . Three copies of the application fos renewal of approval should also be sent di rectly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

[फा. सं . 13/7/2003- बी ओ ए] डी. पी. भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव [Notification No 64/2004/F. N. 203/ 101 /2002- ITA-1 ] SANGEETA GUJTA, Director ( ITA.II ) 1026

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

(Department of EconomicAffairs)

(Banking Division)

New Delhi , the 26th February, 2004

कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण) अधिनियम , 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा श्री विश्वजीत काकोर्ट , सामान्य लिपिक, युनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंडिया, दिसपुर शाखा को 27-2-2004 से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए और उसके बाद उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक या युनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंडिया के कर्मकार कर्मचारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक या. अगले आदेशों तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक बोर्ड में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है , बशर्ते कि वह लगातार इह वर्ष से अधिक की अवधिके लिये पदभार ग्रहण नहीं करेंगे ।

[फा. सं. 15/2/2003-आई.आर. ] S. O. 567. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central Government on the recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India , hereby declares that the provisions of Sub - section ( 1) of Section 15 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 shall not apply to the ICICI Bank Ltd. in so far as treatment of the expenditure related to the Early Retirement Option Scheme being treated as Deferred Revenue Expenditure , for the financial year 2003-2004 to 2007- 2008.

ए. थामस, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th Febuary, 2004- [F. No. 13/ 7/ 2003 -BOA] D. P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 27 फरवरी , 2004

का. आ. 568.- भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ( अनुषंगी बैंक ) अधिनियम, 1970 ( 1959 का अधिनियम 38 ) की धारा 26 की उपधारा ( 2 क) के सांथ पठित धारा 25 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( गक) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री अतुल प्रधान, विशेष, सहायक, स्टेट बैंक आफ इंदौर, पटंकर बाजार, लश्कर, ग्वालियर को 27 फरवरी , 2004 से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए और उसके बाद उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्तिहोने तक अथवा स्टेट बैंक आफ इंदौर के कर्मकार कर्मचारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक, इनमें से जो भी सबसे पहले हो, स्टेट बैंक आफ इंदौर के कर्मकार कर्मचारियों में से, स्टेट बैंक आफ इंदौर के निदेशक बोर्ड में निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 15/1/2003- आई.आर. ]

S. O. 569. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of Sub - section 3 of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970 read with Sub-section (2) of Clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions Scheme , 1970 , the Central Government hereby ppoints Shri Biswajit Kakoti , General Clerk, United Bank of India, Dispur Branch as a Director on the Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years with effect from 27-2-2004 and thereafter until his successor is appointed or till he cases to be a Workmen employee of United Bank of India or until further orders, whichever is earlier provided that he shall not hold office continuously for a period exceeding six years.

ए० थामस, अवर सचिव

[F. No. 15/2/2003 - IR] New Delhi , the 27th February , 2004

A. THOMAS , Under Secy.

नई /देल्ली , 4 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 570.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949-(1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केद्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्तअधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 200 तक सुल्तानपुर जिला सहकारी बैंक लि. , सुलतानपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश पर लागू नहींहोंगे ।

[फा. सं. 1 ( 30)/2003- एसी ] S. O. 568. In pursuance of clause (ca) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 25 read with Sub- section (2A) of Section 26 of the State Bank of India ( Subsidiary Banks ) Act , 1970 ( Act 38 of 1959 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Atul Pradhan , Special Assistant , State Bank of Indore , Patankar Bazar , Lashkar , Gwalior as a Director on the Board of State Bank of Indore from among the employees of State Bank of Indore, who are workmen, for a period of three years from 27th February, 2004 and thereafter until his successor is appointed or till he ceases to be a workman employee of State Bank of Indore or until further orders , whichever event occurs the earliest .

[F. No. 15 /1 / 2003 - IR]

खडग सिंह, अवर सचिव ( एसी ).

A. THOMAS , Under Secy.

New lelhi , the 4th March, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 27 फरवरी, 2004

का. आ. 569. - राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड 9 के उपखंड ( 2 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी

S. O. 570. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 red with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central . Government onrecommendation of the Reserve [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ].

Bank of India declares that the provisions of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Act shall not apply to the Sultanpur District Co- operative Bank Limited, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh from the date of publication of thisnotification in the Official Gazette till 31 March, 2005.

[F. No. 1(30)/2003 -AC] KHARG SINGH , Under Secy . ( AC) संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (डाकविभाग) नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 571.- राजभाषा नियम , ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजन के लिए प्रयोग ) , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार डाक विभाग के निम्नलिखित अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ( ग्रुप ' घ ' कर्मचारियों को छोड़कर ) ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है :-

पिनकोड क्र.सं. कार्यालय का नाम

(1)

(3) (2)

171001 मुख्य डाकघर, शिमला जीपीओ

171003 उप डाकघर एजी डाकघर, शिमला

171003 उप डाकघर ए.एच.क्यू. , शिमला

171001. 4. उप डाकघर अम्बेदकर चौंक, शिमला

171223 उप डाकघर, अदाल

171225 6. उप डाकघर, बाधी

171226 उप डाकघर, बलग

171018 उप डाकघर, बसन्तपुर

171005 9 . उप डाकघर, बालूगंज

171001 10. उप डाकघर, बस स्टैण्ड

171217 11. उप डाकघर, चड़ोली

171208 12. उप डाकघर, चिड़गांव

171220 13. उप डाकघर, छैला

171211 14. उपडाकघर, चौपाल

15.

171201 उप डाकघर, सीपीआर आई

16.

171201 उप डाकघर, कम्बरमीअर

171012 17. उप डाकघर ढ़ली

18.

171103 उप डाकघर, धामी

171209 19. उप डाकघर, फाग्र

20.

171206 उप डाकघर, हाटकोटी

21.

171002 उप डाकघर, हिमाचल प्रदेश सचिवालय

22.

171001 उप डाकघर, आईजीएमसी

171019 23. उप डाकघर , जलोग

171214 24. उप डाकघर, जांगला

171216 25. उप डाकघर, जुन्गा

171006 26. उप डाकघर, जतोग

171205 27 . उप डाकघर, जुब्बल

1027

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

(1)

(2)

(3)

171009 28. उप डाकघर, कुसुमपटी

29.

171204 उप डाकघर, क्यारी

30.

171002 उप डाकघर, खलीनी

171202 31. उप डाकघर, कोटखाई

32.

171003 उप डाकघर, कैथू

33.

171221 उप डाकघर, क्वार

34.

171001 उप डाकघर, लोअर बाजार

35.

171216 उप डाकघर, सांदल

36.

171215 उप डाकघर, मण्ढ़ोल

37.

171007 उप डाकघर, मशोवरा

38. उप डाकघर, मत्याना

171212

171213 39. उप डाकघर, नारकण्डा

40.

171210 उप डाकघर, नेरवा

41.

171009 उप डाकघर, न्यूशिमला

42.

171207 उप डाकघर, रोहडू

171222 43. उप डाकघर, सन्धू

44.

171006 उप डाकघर, संजौली

45.

171219 उप डाकघर, शोधी

46. उप डाकघर, शिमला ईस्ट

171002 47.

171005 उप डाकघर, समर हिल

48. उप डाकघर, समर कोट

171224 49.

171301 उप डाकघर, सुमनी भज्जी

50.

171010 उप डाकघर, तारा देवी

51.

171201 उप डाकघर, ठियोग

52.

171203 उप डाकघर, टिक्कर

53.

171011 उप डाकघर, टूटू

54. अधीक्षक डाकघर, सोलन मण्डल, सपरूम 173211 पुष्य सवर, सोलन

173212 55.

56. मुख्य डाकघर, नाहन

173011 57. उप डाकघर, अर्की

173208

173205 581 उप डाकघर, बद्दी

174103 उप डाकघर, कोटीवाला

173217 उप डाकघर, चाथल

61. उप.डाकघर, चम्बाघाट

173213

173001 62. उप डाकघर, कोर्ट रोड, नाहन

63.

173210 उप डाकघर, डगशाई

64.

171101 उप डाकघर, दाड़ला

65.

173209 उप डाकघर, धर्मपुर

66.

173218:

उप डाकघर , दिग्गल

173221 67. उप डाकघर, सुमैहर 1028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

(2)

(1)

(3) 68.

173022 उप डाकघर, ददाहू

69.

173201 उप डाकघर, गढ़खल

173020 70. उप डाकघर, गिरिनगर

71.

173225 उप डाकघर, जुब्बड़

173215 72. उप डाकघर, कण्डाघाट

73 .

173204 उपडाकघर, कसौली

74.

173204 उप डाकघर, कसौली. एम.टी.

75.

173204 उप डाकघर, कसौली आई.आई.

173229 76. उप डाकघर, कुम्माहर हट्टी

77.

173207 उप डाकघर, कुनिहार

78 .

173001 उप डाकघर, कच्चा टैंक नाहन

173030 79.

उप डाकघर, काला अम्ब

80.

173026 उप डाकघर, कौला वाला भूड

81.

173227 उप डाकघर, ममलीग

82.

173021 उप डाकघर, माजरा

83.

174101 उप डाकघर, नालागढ़

84.

173230 उप डाकघर, नौणी

85.

173104 उप डाकघर, नौहरा

86 .

173223 उप डाकघर, ओच्छघाट

87.

173220 उप डाकघर, परवाणू

88.

173233 उप डाकघर, पट्टा

89 .

173025 उप डाकघर, पावंटा साहिब

90.

173212 उप डाकघर, राजगढ़ रोड सोलन

91.

174102 उप डाकघर, रामशहर

92.

173028 उप डाकघर, राजबन

93.

173101 उप डाकघर, राजगढ़

173202. 94. उप डाकघर, सनावर

95.

173211 उप डाकघर, सपरून

96.

173214 उप डाकघर, सोलन बरूरी

97.

173206 उप डाकघर, सुबाथू

173220 98. उप डाकघर, सैक्टर -2 परवाणु

99 .

173023 उप डाकघर, संगड़ाह

100.

173029 उप डाकघर, सतौन

101.

173024 उप डाकघर, सराहां

102.

173027 उप डाकघर, शिलाई

[सं. 11017-2/2003- रा.भा. ]

डा. पुष्पलता सिंह, निदेशक (राजभाषा) MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Department of Posts)

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S.O. 571. In pursuance of Rule 10(4) of the Official Language ( use for official purposes of the

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following subordinate offices of the Department of Posts where 80 per cent staff has acquired the workingknowledge of Hindi :

Sl . No. Name ofPost Office

(1)

(2)

Pin Code (3) 1. ShimlaGPO

171001 2 AGPO Shimla Sub PostOffice 171003 3.

171003 AHQ Sub Post Office

171001 Ambedkar Chowk, Shimla Sub PostOffice

5. Arhal Sub Post Office

171223 6.

171225 Baghi Sub Post Office

171226 Balag Sub Post Office

171018 Basantpur Sub Post Office

171005 Balugunj Sub Post Office

10.

171001 Bus Stand Sub Post Office

Charoli Sub Post Office

11.

171217 12.

171208 Chirgaon Sub Post Office

13. Chhaila Sub Post Office

171220 14.

171211 Chopal Sub Post Office

15. C.P.R.I. Sub Post Office

171201 16. Combermere Sub Post Office

171201 17. Dhalli Sub Post Office

171012 18. Dhami Sub Post Office

171103 19.

171209 Fagu SurPost Office

20.

171206 Hatkoti Sub Post Office

21.

171002 H.P. Sectt. Sub Post Office

22.

171001 1.G.M.C. Sub Post Office

23.

171019 Jalog Sub Post Office

24.

171214 Jangla Sub Post Office

25.

171216 Junga Sub Post Office

26.

171006 Jatog Sub Post Office

27. Jubbal Sub Post Office

171205 28.

171009 Kasumpati Sub Post Office

29. Kiari Sub Post Office

171204 30. Khalini Sub Post Office

171002 31.

171202 Kothai Sub Post Office

32.

171003 Kaithu Sub Post Office

33. KwarSub Post Office

171221 34. Lower Bazar Sub Post Office

171001 35. Mandal Sub Post Office

171216 36. Mandhole Sub Post Office

171215 37.

171007 Mashobra Sub Post Office

38.

171212 Matiana Sub Post Office [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1029

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

(1)

(2)

(3) 39. Markanda Sub Post Office

171213

171210 40. Narwa Sub PostOffice

41 . New Shimla Sub Post Office

171009

171207 42. Rohru Sub Post Office

43.

171222 Sandhu Sub Post Office

171006 44. Sanjauli Sub Post Office

45.

171219 Shoghi Sub Post Office

171002 46. Shimla East Sub Post Office

47. Summer Hill Sub Post Office

171005

171224 48. Summer Kot Sub Post Office

や

49.

171301 Sunni Bhajji Sub Post Office

171010 50. Tara Devi Sub Post Office

51.

171201 Theog Sub Post Office

52.

171203 Tikkar Sub PostOffice

53.

171011 Totu Sub Post Office

173211 54. Supdt. of Post Offices , Solan Division, Saproon

173212 55. Head Post Office , Solan

173011 56. Head PostOffice , Nahan

57. Arki Sub Post Office

173208

173205 58. Baddi Sub Post Office

59.

174103 Brotiwala Sub Post Office

173217 Chail Sub Post Office

60.

173213 61. Chambaghat Sub PostOffice

62.

173001 Court Road Nahan Sub Post Office

173210 63. Dagshai Sub Post Office

171101 64. Darla Sub Post Office

65.

173209 Dharmpur Sub Post Office

173218 66. Diggal Sub Post Office

67.

173221 Domehar Sub Post Office

68.

173022 Dadahu Sub Post Office

173201 Garkhal Sub Post Office

69.

70.

173020 Girinagar Sub Post Office

173225 71. Jubbar Sub Post Office

173215 72. Kandaghat Sub Post Office

173204 73. Kasauli Sub Post Office

74.

173204 Kasauli MT Sub Post Office

(3) (1)

(2)

173204 75. Kasauli RI

76.

173229 Kumarhatti Sub Post Office

173207 77. Kunihar Sub PostOffice

173001 Kacha Tank Nahan Sub Post Office

78.

79. Kala Amb

173030 80.

173026 Kauawala Bhood Sub Post Office

173227 81. Mamligh Sub Post Office

173021 82. Majra Sub Post Office

83.

174101 Nalagarh Sub Post Office

84.

173230. Nauni Sub Post Office

85.

173104 Nohra Sub PostOffice

173223 86. Oachghat Sub Post Office

173220 Parwanoo Sub Post Office

87.

173233 88. Patta Sub Post Office

173025 89. Paonta Sahib Sub Post Office

173212 90. Rajgarh Road Solan Sub Post Office

174102 91. Ramshehar Sub Post Office

173028 Rajban Sub Post Office

92.

173101 93. Rajgarh Sub Post Office

94.

173202 Sanawar Sub PostOffice

173211 95. Saproon Sub Post Office

173214 96. Solan Brewerey Sub PostOffice

97.

173206 Subathu Sub Post Office

98. Sector-2, Parwanoo Sub Post Office 173220 99.

173023 Sangrah Sub Post Office

100.

173029 Sataun Sub Post Office

101 ..

173024 Sarahan Sub Post Office

173027 102. Shillai Sub Post Office

[No. 11017-2/2003 -OL] DR. PUSHPLATA SINGH, Director (OL) सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 572.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में दूरदर्शन महानिदेशालय और गीत एवं नाटक प्रभाग (सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय ) के निम्नलिखित अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों, जिनके 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है: - 1030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1. दूरदर्शन केन्द्र, पुणे

11. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Gadchirauli .

12. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Brahmapuri .

2. दूरदर्शन केन्द्र, मथुरा

13. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Wani .

3. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, कोसांबा

14. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Shironcha.

4. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र , डेडियापाड़ा

15. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Aheri .

5. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, केवडिया कॉलोनी

16. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Pandharkawada.

6. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, भरूच

17. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Bhamragarh.

7. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, अमोद

18. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Chandrapur.

8. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, पांगरोल ( सूरत )

19 Song and Drama Centre , Raipur.

9. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, राजपापला

[F. No. E - 11017/4/2002-Hindi ] 10. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र , झगडिया

S. S. KATARIA, Director (O.L. ) 11. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, गडचिरोला

नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी, 2004

12. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, ब्रह्मपुरी

13. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, वणी

14. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, सिरोंचा

15. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, अहेरी

16. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र , पांढरकवडा

का.आ. 573.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनोंके लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में फिल्म प्रभाग ( सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय ) के निम्नलिखित अधीनस्थकार्यालय, जिमके 80% से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है :-

17. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, भामरागड

1. राष्ट्रीय फिल्म संग्रहालय, लॉ कॉलेज रोड़, पुणे-411004 18. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति प्रेषित्र, चंद्रपुर

19. गीत एवं नाटक केंद्र , रायपुर

[ फा० सं. ई -11017/4/2002-हिन्दी] समय सिंह कटारिया, निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) [फा० सं. ई -11017/4/2002 -हिन्दी]

New Delhi , the 26th February, 2004

समय सिंह कटारिया, निदेशक ( राजभाषा) MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

New Delhi , the 26th February, 2004

S.O. 573. In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rule, 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following subordinate office of Film Division (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting) , more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :-

1. National Film Archives of India, Law College Road, Pune-411004 .

S.O. 572. In pursuance of Sub -Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rulc , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following subordinate offices of DG: Doordarshan and Song and Drama Division ( Ministry of Information and Broadcasting ) , more than 80% of the staff whereof of have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi

[F. No. E- 11017/4/2002 -Hindi ] S. S. KATARIA, Director ( O.L. ) -

मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय

1. Doordarshan Kendra , Pune .

2. Doordarshan Kendra, Mathura .

(माध्यमिक और उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) (तकनीकी अनुभाग-1 )

3. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Kosamba.

नई दिल्ली, 3 फरवरी, 2004.

4. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Dediapada.

5. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Kevadia Colony.

6. Doordarshan Low Power. Transmitter, Bharouch.

7. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Amod.

8. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Mangrol (Surat).

9. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Rajpipla.

का. आ. 574.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, सरकारी स्थल ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, नीचे दी गई सारंणी के स्तंभ ( 1 ) में वर्णित अधिकारों को, जो सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी की पंक्तिके समतुल्य अधिकारी है , उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए संपदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है और उक्त अधिकारी उक्त सारणी के स्तंभ (2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट सरकारी स्थानों के संबंध में अपनी अधिकारिता की स्थानीय सीमाओं के भीतर उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा या उसके अधीन 10. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Jhagdia .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1031

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

संपदा अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग और उन पर अधिरोपित कर्तव्यों का पालन करेगा :-

सारणी

अधिकारी का पदनाम

और ब्रिटिश नागरिक डा. राजीव अमर्सी, जिनके पास उपयुक्त अर्हताहै , श्रीमती सुशीलाबेन और आर. मेहता एवं सर किकाभाई प्रेमचन्द 'कार्डियक संस्थान , प्लाट संख्या 96 , रोड संख्या 31 , नजदीक गांधी मार्किट, किंग्ज सर्कल ( ई ) , मुम्बई -400022 से पूर्त कार्य के प्रयोजन के लिए संबद्ध है और न कि निजी लाभ के लिए;

सरकारी स्थानों के प्रवर्ग और अधिकारिता की स्थानीय सीमाएं

संस्थान इंजीनियर,

अतः , अब उपर्युक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. राजीव अमर्सी द्वारा चिकित्सा व्यवसाय की अवधि:-

रुड़की-247667

भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान, रुडकीके, भारतीय १ प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान , या उसके द्वारा या उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए या अधिगृहीत स्थान ।

[सं. 7-30/2003- टी.एस. आई ]

(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से छह महीने की अवधि तक; अथवा

वी. एस. पाण्डे, संयुक्त, सचिव

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Department of Secondary and Higher Education)

(Technical Section - I)

NewDelhi , the 3rd February, 2004

(ख) उस अवधि तक, जिसके दौरान डा. राजीव अमर्सी, श्रीमती सुशीलाबेन आर. मेहता एवं सर किकाभाई प्रेमचन्द कार्डियक संस्थान , प्लाट संख्या 96, रोड संख्या 31 , नजदीक गांधी मार्किट, किंग्ज सर्कल ( ई ) , मुम्बई- 400022 से सम्बद्ध रहते हैं , इनमें से जो भी कम हो, परिसीमित होगी ।

[सं.वी.- 11016/1/2004- एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

पी. जी. कलाधरन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department ofHealth)

NewDelhi , the 24th February, 2004 S.O. 575. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction ofUnauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column (1 ) of the Table below, being an officer equivalent to the rank of a gazetted officer of the Government to be the estate officer for the purpose of the said Act and the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on estate officers by or under the said Act within the local limits of his jurisdiction in respect of the public premises specified in column (2) of the said Table :-

TABLE

Designation of the Officer Categories of public

S.O. 575.- Whereas medical qualification MD granted by University of London is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act; premises and local limits

jurisdiction

Institute Engineer,

Premises belonging to or

Indian Institute of

Technology,

Andwhereas Dr. Rajiv Amersey, a British national , who possess the said qualification is attached to Smt . Sushilaben R. Mehta and Sir Kikabhai Premchand Cardiac Institute, Plot No. 96, Road No. 31 , Near Gandhi Market , King's Circle (E ) , Mumbai - 400022 for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;

Roorkee-247667

taken or lease or requisitioned by, or on behalf of the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkeeand which are under its administrative control

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Rajiv Amersey in India shall be limited to:-

[No. 7-30/2003 - TS I ]

VS PANDEY, Jt . Secy.

(a) a period of six months from the date of issue ofthis notification; or

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग)

नईदिल्ली, 24 फरवरी, 2004

(b) the period during which Dr. Rajiv Amersey is attachedto Smt . Sushilaben R. Mehta and Sir Kikabhai Premchand Cardiac Institute , Plot No. 96 , Road No. 31 , Near Gandhi Market, King's Circle (E ) , Mumbai - 400022 , whichever is shorter.

[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2004 -ME ( Policy -I ] का.आ. 575.-लन्दन विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गई एम. डी. चिकित्सा अर्हता भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 , (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अंतर्गत, एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;

P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy. 689G1/2004-2 1032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 576.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स टी. टी. सी. वेइंग सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. , 33/1 , एन. एस. जी. रोड, ( कमरा नं. 307 ) कोलकाता -700001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 3 ) वाले " एल डब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, सदृश सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म स्टीलयार्ड प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटलस " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/378 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक प्लेटफार्म ( स्टील यार्ड प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है ।

सील : स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए अन्य महत्वपूर्ण भाग जैसे संतोलक गोला आदि पर भी सील बन्दी बन्दी की जाएगी ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 10 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम से ऊपर 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतन क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 133 )/2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1033 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/ फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 10th February, 2004

S.O. 576. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections ( 7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic (Platform steel yard type) weighing instrument with analogue indication of " LWB " series of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class III) and with brand name " ATLAS" ( herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . T.T.C. Weighing Systems Pvt . Ltd. , 33/1 , N. S. C. Road, (Room No. 30 ) Kolkatta- 700001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/378 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a Platform weighting instrument ( steel yard type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 200 g .

Seal : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing may also done on other vital pårts like balancing ball etc. to prevent this opening for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model is be cover the other weighing instruments of same accuracy class and of same make with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 10 g . or more and with ' e' value 1x 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal or to zero , manufacturedby the same manufacturer with the same principle , design , and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 133 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 577.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूष है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) और उप- धारा (7 ) तथा उप - धारा ( 8 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स टेल टेक इंस्ट्रूमेंटेशन प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, 28/48 , खार्डी ऑफ नगर रोड, पूना -411014 द्वारा विनिर्मित 0.3 मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग वाली श्रृंखला के मॉडल का जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सी-35 का पाजिटिव डिस्प्लेमेट मीटर" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13/2003/539 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

सीलिंग : अंशशोधन डिब्बे के ढक्कन को अंशशोधन डिब्बे के ढक्कन पर लगी हुई मुद्रा तार की मदद से मुद्रांकित किया जाता है । जहां सत्यापन मुद्रा लगाई जाएगी वहां टर्मिनल बाक्स के ऊपर एक बेदाग स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट का उपबंध किया गया है ।

000

DO NOT

मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकृति देखें ) 40 मि.मी. अभिहित आकार का धनात्मक प्रतिस्थापन मीटर है । परीक्षित मॉडल 35 से 350 लीटर प्रति मिनट प्रवाह रेंज वाला है जिसकी द्रव की विस्कोसीटी माप 0.5 सी एस टी से 200 सी एस टी है और अधिकतम कार्य दाब 10.54 कि. ग्रा . प्रति वर्ग से. मीटर है । न्यूनतम मापीय मात्रा 100 लीटर है । मीटर का उपयोग बैच करने, संमिश्र करने के मापन और रासायनिक, पेट्रोलियम, औषधीय , पेंट, विलायक, प्रसंस्करण उद्योग तथा अन्य क्षेत्रों में, जिनमें भराव , टंकी, ट्रक/रेल वैगन के स्वचालन लदान और डाटा अर्जन प्रणालियां अंतरविष्ट हैं , नुस्खा बनाने के लिए किया जाता है ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 72 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1035

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 11th February, 2004

S.O. 577.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to Sub -section (3 ) and Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the " Model Positive Displacement Meter of C-35 " series belonging to accuracy class 0.3 (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Teletech Instrumentation Private Limited, 28/48 , Khardi , Off Nagar Road, Pune -411014 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 /2003/539;

Sealing : Calibration box cover is sealed with the help of wire seal affixed on the calibration box cover . A stainless stamping plate provided on the terminal box ever where the verification stamp may be fixed.

حة

The model (see the figure given above) is a positive displacement meter of nominal size of 40mm . The tested model is having flow range of 35 to 350 litres per minute. Rànge of viscosity of liquid measured is 0.5 CST to 200 CST. The maximum working pressure is 10.54 kg/ cm² . The minimum measurable quantity is 100 litres . The meter is used for measurement of batching , blending and dispensing in chemical , Petroleum , Pharmaceutical , paints , solvent, process industries and other fields , contain filling, tank truck/ rail wagon loading automation and data acquisition systems .

[F. No. WM- 21 (72 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 12 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 578.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स प्रशाद हाई टेक सिस्टम्स, 8 , संगम सोसाइटी, निकट पदमावती ब्रिज, पुणे-411037 द्वारा विनिर्मित " पी एच " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , भरात्मक भरण मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पी एच डब्ल्यू एफ" है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2003 / 388 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

コ

यह मॉडल विकृत मापी टाइप भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित भारात्मक भरण मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है यह अधिकतम 40 थैलियां प्रति मिनट भर सकती है । मशीन, चाय , चीनी, चावल , बीज, मिष्ठान्न , बिस्किट, आलू चिप्स, आदि जैसे मुक्त प्रवाह उत्पादों को भरने के लिए अभिकल्पित है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के स्वचालित भरण मशीन भी होगी जो 5 ग्रा. से 5 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में अधिकतम क्षमता वाली है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 ( 191) /2002 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1037

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 12th February, 2004

S.O. 578. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said 'Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of automatic gravimetric filling machine of " PH- WF " series with brand name " PRASAD - HITECH " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Prasad Hi -Tech Systems , 8 , Sangam Society, Near Padmawati Bridge, Pune-411037 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/388;

コ

The Model is a strain gague type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling machine . Its maximum capacity is 2 kg . It has a maximum fill rate of 40 pouches per minute . The machine is designed for filling free flowing products like tea , sugar , rice , seeds , confectionery, biscuits , potato chips , etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of the said section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the automatic filling machine of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 5g to 5 kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 191 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 579.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावनाहै कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स वाई एन सी लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग, गौशाला लेन, मालाड ( पूर्व) मुंबई--400097 द्वारा विक्रा निषियथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एम् श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके का नाम " सी एच वाई ओ " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/408 सम णित किया गया , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोसन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सीलबन्दी : स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दी की गई है । MP-300G 310gX0.001g

MP-400G 410g×0.001g

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, शुद्धता, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि० ग्रा. या उसके अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50000 से अन्यून सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधितम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 (58 ) /2000] पी . ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1039 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

New Delhi, the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 579. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non- automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MP " series of special accuracy (Accuracy class I) and with brand name " CHYO " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s YMC Limited, Japan and marketed by M/s. Citizen Scales( I) Pvt Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2003/408;

The said model ( see the figure given above ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacily of 3100g and minimum capacity of 1g, The verfication scale interval (e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect, The Liquid crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result . The Instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealling is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model is be cover the other weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) not less than 50,000 and ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole numu er or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 58 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689GI/2004-3 1040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 580.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मेटलर टोलेडो ए जी को लिमिटेड, स्विटजरलैण्ड द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिग , गौशाला लेन, माडल ( पूर्व ) मुंबई -400097 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " जी वी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003 /409 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव किंस्टल डायोड प्रदर्शन तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी की गई है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है, उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्राम तक " ई" मानके लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58) /2000]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान יו 1041 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 580.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non -automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " GB " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II), and with brand name " METTLER " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Mettler Toledo AG CO Limited, Switzerland and marked by M/ s . Citizen Scales (I) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2003 /409;

The said model (see figure given above) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3100g and minimum capacity of 5g . The verification scale interval (e) is 100mg. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing is the done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1mg. to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (58 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 581.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सिनको डेन्शी को लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग, गौशाला लेन , मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा विक्रीत उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " डीजे " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिनको " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003/410 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तीलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्शन तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी कीगई है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त शुद्धता, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58) /2000] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1043

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 581.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "DJ " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class II ) , and with brand name " SHINKO" ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Shinko Denshi Co. Limited, Japan and Markted by M/s . Citizen Scales ( I ) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/410;

The said Model (see figure given below) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 600g and minimum capacity of 200mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of the said Section of the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg. to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (58)/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 582.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिंको डेन्शी को लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड , 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा विक्रीत उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " सीजी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइप, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शिंको " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/411 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 620 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्शन तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल (एन) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58 ) /2000 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1045

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 582.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the repreport submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non -automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CG " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class II ), and with brand name " SHINKO" ( herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s . Shinko Denshi Co. Limited, Japan and Markted by M/ s . Citizen Scales (I ) Pvt . Limited , 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane. Malad (East) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003 /411 ;

The said model (see figure given below ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 620g and minium capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with, the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 58)/ 2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 583.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बोट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स वाई एम सी लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्ा ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन , मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई--400097 द्वारा विक्रीत उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एम के " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइप , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मालका, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सी एय धाई ओ " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2003 /412 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन नाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकरि ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमे एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्शन तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

गईहै । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी की और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम 36 की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंजमें सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधितम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58 ) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1047 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 583. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MK " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II ), and with brand name " CHYO " (herein referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s YMC Limited, Japan and markted by M/s . Citizen Scales ( I) Pvt. Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East) Mumbai- 400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/412 ;

The said model (see figure given below ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 600g and minimum capacity of 200mg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 58)/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689GI /2004-4 1048

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 ,

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 584.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिमादजु कारपोरेशन, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा विक्रीत उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " बी एल " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइप , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शिमादजु " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003/413 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 620 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमे एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

जानी है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दीकी और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम 36 की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 मि. ग्रा . तक की अधितम क्षमता वाले और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 58 ) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1049

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 584.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non -automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "BL " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II ) , and with brand name " SHIMADZU" (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Shimadzu Corporation , Japan and Marketedby M/ s . Citizen Scales ( I) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane , Malad ( East) Mumbai - 400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003 / 413 ;

The said Model ( see figure given below) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 620g and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale - interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of img . to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2× 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (58)/2000]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1050

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 585.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जाडेवर स्केल कं. , ताईवान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3, पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन , मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा विक्रीत उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग ) वाले " स्नग " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइम , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जाडेवर " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003 /414 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी कीजानी है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम 36 की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यप्न मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10के के हैं , जिसमें क धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58 ) /2000 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1051

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 585. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed aul nority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976), and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SNUG " series of High accuracy (Accuracy class II ) , and with brand name " JADEVER" ( hereinafter referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/s Jadever Scale Co. , Taiwan, and Marked by M/s . Citizen Scales (I ) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai - 400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /414;

The said Model (see figure given above ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 300g and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 58 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 586.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एंड कं लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मालाड (पूर्व) मुबंई-400097 द्वारा विक्रीत विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग I ) वाले " एफ एक्स " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइम , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एंड " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 415 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमतां 200 मि.ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम 36 की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50000 ( > 50,000 ) से अनधिक सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1053

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 586.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "FX" series of Special accuracy (Accuracy class I ) , and with brand name " AND " (herein referred to as the model) , manufactured by M / s AND Co. Limited, Japan, and Marketed by M/s . Citizen Scales (I) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /415;

The said model (see figure given above) is a strain gauge typed based range weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3100g and minium capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

マー

1980

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) not less than 50,000 (≥50,000 ) and with ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 58)/ 2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 587.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, 'यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिंको देशी कं ० लिमिटेड जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिग , गौशाला लेन, मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा । ५. वेणेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग I ) वाले " जो श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइप , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राड " शिंको" है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09 /2003 / 416 समनुदेशित किया गया है, भानुनोदन प्रमाणत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3000 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमे एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सीलबन्दी: स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी कीजानी है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम 36 की धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50000 ( ≥ 50,000 ) से अनधिक सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10% के हैं, जिसमें. के घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम . - 21 ( 58 ) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1055 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 587.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating , non-automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CG " series of Special accuracy (Accuracy class I) , and with brand name " SHINKO " ( hereinafter referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s Shinko Deshi Co. Limited, Japan, and Marketed by M/s . Citizen Scales (1) Pvt . Limited, 3 , Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2003 /416;

The said model (see figure given above ) is a weighting instrument with a maximum capacity of 3000g and minimum capacity of 1g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid crystal Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate, the sealing is be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) not less than 50,000 (≥50,000) and with 'e ' value Img or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , kbeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (58 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689GI/2004-5 1056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 588.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिमादलु कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3, पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा विक्रीत विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग I ) वालें " बी एल " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइप, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शिमादजु " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/2003/417 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1200 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 ( > 50,000 ) से अंन्यून सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं , जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58 ) /2000 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1057

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 588. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model i's likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non-automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " BL " series of Special accuracy (Accuracy class I ) , and with brand name " SHIMADZU" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Shimadzu Corporation Limited , Japan , and Marketed by M's . Citizen Scales (I ) Pvt. Limited, 3, Pushpanjali Building, Gaushala Lane , Malad (East ) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/417;

The said model ( see figure given above ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1200g and minimum capacity of 200 mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply ;

Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the seailing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) not less than 50,000 (> 50,000) and with ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k, or5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 58 )/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1058

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी, 2004

का.आ. 589. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि. उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 की 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात 'की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिन्को देशी कं ० लिमिटेड, जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटिजन स्केल्स ( आई ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, 3 , पुष्पांजली बिल्डिंग , गौशाला लेन, मालाड ( पूर्व ) मुबंई -400097 द्वारा विक्रीत विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग I ) वाले " डी जे " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, टेबल टाप टाइप, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शिंको " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003 /418 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुनोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) 'तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3000 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । सीलबन्दी स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्दी कीजानी है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि. उक्तमॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला केवैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 ( ≥ 50,000 ) से अन्यून सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की संख्या सहित 50 कि. ग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जिसमें के धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 58 )/2000 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1059 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 589. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self- indicating, non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " DJ " series of Special . accuracy (Accuracy class I ) and with brand name " SHINKO " ( herein after referred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Shinko Deshi Co. Limited, Japan, and Marketed by M/ s . Citizen Scales (1) Pvt . Limited, 3, Pushpanjali Building , Gaushala Lane, Malad (East ) Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/418;

The said model (see figure given above ) is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3000 g and minimum capacity of 1g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing : In addition to sealing the stamping plate , the sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine to avoid fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model is be cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) not less than 50,000 ( ≥50,000) and with ' e' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 , or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design, and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured ..

[F. No. WM-21 (58)/2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 590.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स माडर्न स्टील वर्क्स 652 , गली नं. 14 , गांधी चौक, गऊशाला फाटक, गाजियाबाद उ. प्र. काउन्टर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम एस डब्ल्यू" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/2003/ 511 समंमुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक काउण्टर मशीन है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है. कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है । समरूप काउण्टर मशीन 500 ग्राम से 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 261 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1061

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 590.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of counter machine with brand name "MSW" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Modern Steel Works, 652, Gali No. 14 , Gandhi Chowk, Gaushala Phatak, Gaziabad Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/ 2003 /511 ;

The said model ( See the figure given below) is a counter machine. The maximum capacity is 10kg .

[F. No. WM -21 (261 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 591.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स स्मार्ट डिस्पेंसर प्राईवेट लिमिटेड, प्लाट सं. ई-187, जी आई डी सी एलेक्ट्रानिक इस्टेट, गांधी नगर -382028 द्वारा विनिर्मित अंकीय संपरिवर्तन सहित वितरक बंधित से संपादर्तित स्वचालित आयल वितरक के लिए संपरिवर्तित किट के माडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्मार्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09,2003/216 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

LS- 2TO

Amour

SMART OIL

उक्त मॉडल, अंकीय संपदर्श सहित उपकरण से संबंधित परिवर्तित स्वचालित आयल वितरक के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 मिली लीटर से 500 मिली लीटर की है जिसमें कम से कम 10 मिली लीटर काउंट के लिए है । यह पेट्रोल/डीजल पंप में स्नेहक तेल वितरक 'के लिए उपयोग किया जाता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 42) /2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1063 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 591.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of conversion kit for converting Automatic Oil Dispenser to dispenser with digital indication and with brand name " SMART " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Smart Dispenser Pvt . Ltd. , plot No. E- 187, G.I.D.C. Electronic Estate, Gandhi Nagar - 382028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/ 2003 / 216 ;

LS - 2T OIL

SMART OIL DISPENSER

The said model is a conversion kit for converting automatic oil dispenser to instrument with digital indication. Its maximum capacity range is from 300 ml to 500 ml with least count of 10 ml . It is used for dispensing of lubricating oil in petrol /diesel pumps .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 42)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689GI /2004-6 1064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/ PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 592.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स लुहार मुलजी नारान, शिवाजी नगर, सावरकुंडला-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित " मुर्गा " काउन्टर मशीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मुर्गा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/474 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्तमांडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक काउण्टर मशीन है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुनादन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है ये विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्राम से 50 कि. ग्रा. तकःकी अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यू. एम . 21 ( 81 ) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1065

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 592.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of a counter machine with brand name "MURGA " ( herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Luhar Mulji Naran, Shivaji Nagar, Savarkundla- 364515 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2003/474;

The said model ( see figure given below) is a counter machine . Its maximum capacity is 5kg .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50kg, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 81 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी , 2004

'का.आ. 593.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ठाकुर स्केल कम्पनी , 4623 , रामनगर, सुलतान विंड रोड, अमृतसर, पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) वाले अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( यांत्रिक प्लेट फार्म मशीन प्रो भार प्रकार ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ठाकुर स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003 /540 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है:

उक्त मॉडल स्टील यार्ड सहित यांत्रिक प्रकार के लीवर पर आधारित असंचालित तोलन उपकरण ( यांत्रिक प्लेटफार्म मशीन- प्रो भार प्रकार ) है । इसकी कितम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है और मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -3 ) से संबंधित है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तं माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री जिससे अनुमोदित माडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (72)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1067 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 16th February , 2004

S.O. 593. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of, Non- automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Platform machine -pro weight type ) with steel yard (hereinafter referred to as the said model) belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) and with brand name " THAKUR SCALE " , manufactured by M/s . Thakur Scale Company , 4623, Ram Nagar, Sultanwind Road , Amiritsar , Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/540;

The said model is a mechanical type liver based non -automatic wighing instrument ( Mechanical Platform machine-Pro weight type ) with steel yard maximum capacity 300kg , minimum capacity 2kg, and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 100g .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 1000kg. and with number of verification scale, interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (72)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 1068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च 2004

का.आ. 594.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कॉमपैक इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, 52 वाल्स रोड पेनरोज , आंकलैंड, न्यूजीलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स लेकाक इंजीनियर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, जे-19 , उद्योग नगर, रोहतक रोड, नई दिल्ली-110041 द्वारा भारत में विक्रीत एक आर 40 पी के द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस ईंधन वितरक पंप है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2003 /541 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

ARTOLPO

माडल की तकनीकी विशेषताएं निम्न प्रकार हैं-

तकनीकी विशेषताएं :

माडल की 40 लीटर/ मिनट अधिकतम प्रवाह दर है ।

मात्रा उपदर्शन

: 0.01 लीटर की बढ़ोत्तरी में 999.99 लीटर

कीमत संप्रदर्शन

: 999.99 रुपए

अधिकतम प्रवाह दर :

40लीटर/मिनट

न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर

4लीटर/मिनट

न्यूनतम माप भात्रा

: 2लीटर/मिनट

मापे गए हाइड्रोकार्बन

: 0.5 से 20 एम पी ए एस ( 20 डिग्री सेंटीग्रेड पर)

कीरेंज का घनत्व

मुहर बंद करना

: मीटर के लिए यांत्रिकी कैलिबरेटर के और के कारक स्विच दोनों को अनुमोदित प्रकार की मुहरों से सीलबन्द किया जाएगा ।

वर्ग

0.5

अधिकतम हवा का दबाव

26बार

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 (162)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1069 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 1925

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S.O. 594. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is along with the model approval and test results, granted by the National Standards Commission, Australia is satisfied that the models described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of, the Liquefied Petroleum Gasd fuel dispensing pump with digital display (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) of MR 40p manufactured by M/s. Compac Industries Ltd. , 52 Walls Road Penrose , Auckland , New Zealand and sold in India by M/s . Laycock Engineers Pvt. Ltd. , J - 19 , Udyog Nagar , Rohtak Road, New Delhi - 110041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/13/2003/541;

AUTO LPO

The technical features of the model are as follow:

The model has maximum flow rate 40 litre/ min

Technical features

999.99 litre in increament of 0.01 litre

Volume indication

Rs . 999.99

PriceDisplay

40 litre/minute

Maximum Flow rate

4 litre/ niin

Minimum flow rate

2 litre/min

Minimum measure Quantity :

0.5 to 20 m Pas ( at 20 ° C)

Density range of hydrocarbons measured

Sealing

The mechanical calibrator for the meter and the K - factor switch are both sealed with approved type seals . These seals may carry the mark of verification.

0.5

Accuracy class

26bar

Maximum Pressure

[F. No. WM-21 ( 162)/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 595.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किं उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का गुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता ब॥ए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नेशनल, शिवाजी नगर, सावरकुण्डला- मैकेनिकल काउण्टर मशीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नेशनल " ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) औरजिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह 09/2003/79 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत काउण्टर मशीन की अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि ग्रा. है और कन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के मैकेनिकल काउण्टर मशीन भी शामिल होंगी जिनके लिए 500 ग्राम से 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमताहै ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -2 । ( 19 )/2002 ]

पी.ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1071 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 595.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by tha prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with.the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of mechanical counter machine (herein - after referred to as the said model ) with brand name " National Scale " , manufactured by M/s . National, Shivaji Nagar , Savarkundla - 364515 (Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/03/79;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a mechanical counter machine with a maximum capacity of 10 kg .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 19)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689GI/2004-7 1072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 596.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स लुहार नारायण देवराज , शिवाजी नगर, सावरकुंडला-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित काउंटर मशीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एल एन डी" ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/ 2003/479 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक काउंटर मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन, यथार्थता के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित जिससे अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्मित किया गया है, 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा. की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता के उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 27 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1073 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 596. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a counter machine with brand Name " L.N.D. " (herein referred to as the Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Luhar Naran Devraj , Shivaji Nagar , Savarkundla-364 515 and which is assigned the approal mark IND /09/2003/479;

The said Model (See the figure given below) is a counter machine. Its maximum capacity is 10kg.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of the said Section, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g. to 50kg. , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design accuracy and with the saine materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (27)/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

नईदिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 597.-केन्द्रीय सरकारका, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत्क्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई. आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए सी ई कारपोरेशन , 105 , अप्सरा अपार्टमेंट, अप्सरा थिएटर, गुलटेकड़ी, पुणे-411037, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-2 ) वाले " एम.एस. पी.एफ. " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मास्टर " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2003 /504 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत मापी प्रकार के भार सेल पर आधारित एक अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 ग्राम है , सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल 10 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द भी किया जाता है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल (एन ) की अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्राम से 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10के हैं, ' के ' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (343 )/2002 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान ין !

1075

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 597.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exèrcise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issue and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MSPF " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II) and with brand name "MASTER" (herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Ace Corporation, 105 , Apsara Apartment NearApsara Theatre , Gultekdi , Pune -411 037, Maharashrta and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003/504;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with maximum capacity of 120kg . and minimum capacity of 500g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent partices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 50kg. to 300kg. , with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2×10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (343)/2002]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 598.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अंब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए सी ई कारपोरेशन, 105 , अप्सरा अपार्टमेंट, अप्सरा थिएटर, गुलटेकड़ी, पुणे-411037, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-2) वाले " एम.एस. टी.डी. " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण (टेबल टाप प्रकार ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मास्टर " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /503 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल विकृत मापी प्रकार के भार सेल पर आधारित एक अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है, सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्द भी किया जाता है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) की अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्राम तक हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 x 10 हैं , ' के ' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 343 ) /2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1077 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 598. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issue and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MSTT " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "MASTER" (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s . Ace Corporation , 105 , Apsara Apartment Near Apsara Theatre, Gultekdi, Pune -411 037 , Maharashrta and which is assigned the apprvoal mark IND/ 09/2003/503;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 22kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent partices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (343 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 599.-केन्द्रीय सरनार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कलकत्ता मैन्युफेक्चरिंग कं. , 8/एच/1 राममोहन बेरालेन, कलकत्ता-700046 द्वारा विनिर्मित सी एम 200 आई टी यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले" सी एम 200 आई टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सी एम एम सी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/2003/585 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृतमापी प्रकार के भार सेल पर आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्राम है, सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 1 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम ठपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 कोल्ट और 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारः विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील भी बन्द किया जाता है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 या 5 × 10 है , ' के' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. 21 ( 268 )/ 2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1079

1925

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गु

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhime 5th March , 2004

S.O. 599.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformitywifethus provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of... sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now; therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of self-indicating, non- automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CM 200 IT " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " CMMC" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Calcutta Manufacturing Co. , 8 /H/ 1 , Rammohan Bera Lane , Kolkata - 700 046 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 /585 ;

The said model ( See the figure given below ) is a strain gauge load cell based type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 5kg . and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply;

Sealing : In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall be done to prevent the opening of machine for fraudulent partices.

ELECTRONIC TABLE- S

CALC

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10) k or 5 × 10% , kbeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (268 )/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689 GI/20048 1080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 600.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तं रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शिव शक्ति स्केल इण्डस्ट्रीज , मलिबाई रोड, सावर कुण्डला-364515 गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित काउन्टर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " शिव शक्ति " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003/ 36 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) काउन्टर मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्राम है ।

10Kg .

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल काविनिर्माण किया गया है उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्राम तक विनिर्मित रेंज की क्षमता ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 200 ) /2001 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1081

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 600.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of counter machine (herein referred to as the Model ), with brand name " SHIV SHAKTI" manufactured by M/s. Shivshakti Scale Industries, Manibhai Road, Savarkundla-364515 (Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approal mark IND/09/2003/36 ;

The said Model (See the figure given below) is a counter machine. Its maximum capacity is 10kg.

い

[F. No. WM-21 (200)/2001 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 601.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है किं उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी लक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

गः अन्ब, कन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इन्डेवर इन्स्ट्रमेन्ट्सप्रा. ए -1 , आनन्द चैम्बर्स, निकट उच्च न्यायालय, नवरंगपुरा , अहमदाबाद-382350 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-3 ) वाले " इन्डेवर " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचने सहित तोलन उपकरण ( बहुभार सेल टाइप वे ब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इन्डेवयर " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2003 /461 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रभाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त भावल नाचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बहुभार सेल आधारित वे ब्रिज टाइप का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन औरन्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्राम है , सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

चाहिये । स्यांपिग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दी की जानी और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल संख्या सहित 5 टन से 50 टन तक की रेंज की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 है जिसमें ' के' घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (42)/97 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1083 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

New Delhi, the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 601.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issue and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non -automatic (Multi load cell type weigh bridge ) weighing instrument with digital indication of "Endeavour " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name "Endeavour" (herein referred to as the Model) , manufactured by M/s . Endeavour Instruments Pvt. A- 1 , Anand Chambers, Near High Court, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad- 382350 Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/461 ;

The said Model ( figure given below) is a multi load cell based weigh bridge type weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and miniinum capacity of 100kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply;

partices. Sealing: In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of the said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , désign, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging between 5 tonne an 50 tonnes and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1kg. or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (42)/97]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1084

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 602.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976- का 60 ) तथा बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इन्डेवर इन्स्ट्रमेन्ट्स प्रा . ए-1 , आनन्द चैम्बर्स, निकट उच्च न्यायालय , नवरंगपुरा, अहमदाबाद-382350 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-3 ) वाले " इन्डेवर " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वे ब्रिज के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इन्डेवयर " है ( जिसे इसमें मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन विहन आई एन डी/09/ 2003/460 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृतमापी भार सेल आधारित टाइप वे ब्रिज के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्राम है, सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

चाहिये । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सीलबन्द करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सील बन्दी की जान और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के इस अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन भान अंतराल संख्या सहित 5 टन से 50 टन के बीच की रेंज में अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के है में ' के' घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. -21 (42) /97]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1085 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2004

S.O. 602. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights , and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issue and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self- indicating, non-automatic (Conversion Kit for weigh bridge type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "Endeavour" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name "Endeavour" (herein referred to as the Model) , manufactured by M/s . Endeavour Instruments Pvt . A- 1 , Anand Chambers Near, High Court, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad- 382350 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/460;

The saidModel (See the figure given below) is a strain gauge load cell based type (conversion kit for weigh bridge) weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply; partices. Sealing: In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing is done to prevent the opening machine for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of the said Section the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, design, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging between 5 tonnes and 50 tonnes and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1kg. or more and with ' e' value i × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, kbeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (42)/97 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 1086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 603. - केन्द्रीय सरकार, को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत) के परिवाहन के लिए, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में, वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से, जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइनं बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर. एम. पंडया, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, ( पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) पो.बा.सं. 4 , डाकघर विरमगाम , जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात -382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची तालुका: नडीयाद

जिला: खेड़ा गाँव का नाम

सर्वे संख्या

राज्य: गुजरात

उप-खण्ड संख्या

3 केरीयाधी

748

749

दंताली

280

हेक्टर

वर्गमीटर

क्षेत्रफल एरिया

6 0

48 0

45 [फ़ा. सं. आर. - 25011/4/2002- ओ आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004

S. O. 603. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest , that for the transportation ofpetroleum (crude) from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies ofthis notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya, Competent Authority, IndianOil Corporation Limited, (Pipeline Division), Post Box No. 4, Post Office Viramgam, District Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 382150;

SCHEDULE Taluka: Nadiad

District: Kheda

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Sub - division No. 1

3 Keriavi

748

749

Dantali

280

State: Gujarat

Hectare

Area Area

Sq. Mtr.

6 0

70 0

48 0

45 [F. No. R. - 2501 1/4/2002-OR- I ] RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

1087 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

नई दिल्ली , 8 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 604.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवाहन के लिए, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से, जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर. एम. पंडया, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, ( पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) पो.बा.सं. 4, डाकघर विरमगाम, जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात-382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

जिला: वडोदरा

तालुका: वडोदरा

राज्य: गुजरात

वर्ग मीटर गाँव कानाम

उप-खण्ड संख्या

हेक्टर

सर्वेसंख्या

क्षेत्रफल एरिया

574

अनगढ

59 571

570

[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/5/2002- ओ आर -1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004

S. O. 604. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest, that for the transportation ofpetroleum (crude) from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian OilCorporation Ltd.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya, Competent Authority, IndianOil Corporation Limited, (Pipeline Division) , Post Box No. 4, Post Office Viramgam, District Ahmedabad, Gujarat-382150;

SCHEDULE

District: Vadodara

State:Gujarat Taluka: Vadodara

Area Area

Hectare

Sq.Mtr.

Sub-division No.

Name oftheVillage SurveyNo.

574

Anagadh

571

570

[F. No. R. -25011 /5/2002 OR-I]

RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

689 GI/2004-9 1088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/ PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, ४ मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 605.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में तथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर.एम. पंड्या, संक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, ( पाइपलाइन ) प्रभाग पो.बा.सं. 4 डाकघर विरमगाम , जिला, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात-382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तालुका: आणंद

जिला: आणंद

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

गांव क़ा नाम

सर्वे संख्या.

उप- खण्ड संख्या

हेक्टर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

6 संदेसर

1473

67 1476

21 गाना

212

57 212

(2+3)

17 220

23 मेघवा गा

222

[फा. स. आर. - 25011/7/2002/ओ आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004

S.O. 605.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest, that for the transportation of petroleum (crude) from Viramgam to Koyll in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipeline Division ) , Post Box No. 4, Post Office Viramgam , District -Ahmedabad, Gujarat-382150 ;

1089

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

State:Gujarat

District : Anand

Taluka : Anand

Sub -Division No.

Survey No.

Name of the Village

1473

Sandesar

1476

212

Gana

212

(2+3)

220

222

Meghva Gana

Area Area

Hectare

Sq. Mtr

.01

[F.No. R. -25011/ 7/2002 OR - I] RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 606.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम (अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र मे यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने केसंबंध में श्री आर.एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, (पाइपलाइन ) प्रभाग पो.बा.सं. 4 डाकघर विरमगाम, जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात -382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: आणंद

तालुका: बोरसद

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टर एयर

उप-खण्ड संख्या

सर्वे संख्या

गांव का नाम

154

दहेमी

186

नामन

118

नापा तलपद

174

175

158

01-

[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/7/ 2002/ओ आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव 1090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004

S.O. 606. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest, that for the transportation of petroleum (crude) from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipeline Division) , Post Box No. 4, Post Office Viramgam, District Ahmedabad, Gujarat- 382150 ;

SCHEDULE

Taluka Borsad

District: Anand

State

Gujarat

Area

Name of the village

SurveyNo.

Sub -Division No.

Hectare

Area Sq. Mtr Dehmi

154

Naman

186

Napa Talpad

118

174

175

158

02. 62

[F.No. R. -25011 / 7/ 2002 OR - I ]

RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 607.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से कोयली तक पेट्रोलियम ( अपरिष्कृत ) के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का, अर्जन करना आवश्यक है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्यिों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है।

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री आर.एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, ( पाइपलाइन ) प्रभाग पो.बा.सं. 4, डाकघर विरमगाभ , जिला अहमदाबाद, गुजरात-382150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा:-

1091

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला : अहमदाबाद

तालुका: साणंद

गुजरात

राज्य :

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर एयर

उप-खण्ड संख्या

सर्वे संख्या.

गांव कानाम

कलाना

100

106

116

137

155

154

00:

[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/45/ 2001/ ओ आर -1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 8th March, 2004

S.O. 607. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest, that for the transportation of petroleum (crude) from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.M. Pandya, CompetentAuthority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipeline Division), Post Box No. 4, Post Office Viramgam, District Ahmedabad, Gujarat -382150;

SCHEDULE

Gujarat

State :

District : Ahmedabad

Taluka : Sanand

Sub -Division No.

Survey No.

Name of the village

Kalana

Area

Area Sq. Mtr.

Hectare

0 1092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

100

106

116

137

155

154

MARCH 13, 2004 /PHALGUNA 23, 1925 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 0

57 0

98 0

61 0

14 0

34 0

06 28 0

42 0

28 0

21 [F.No. R. -25011/45/ 2001 OR - IJ RANUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 8 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 608.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1255 एवं 1256 तारीख 21 अप्रैल, 2003, जो भारत के राजपत्र में तारीख 26 अप्रैल, 2003 , को प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरी लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिन्डा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त अधिसूचना का प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 22 मई, 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट है , में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चिय किया है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइल बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयाग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइल बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लमगों से मुक्त, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची तहसील: लूनी

जिला: जोधपुर

क्रम सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा नं

हिस्सा क्रमांक 1

4 1

कागनाडा

3 2

सिनली

150

148

147

146

144

141

200

राज्य : राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

बीघा बिस्वा

07 1093

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1369

झंवर

इस अधिसूचना में दर्शाया गया क्षेत्रफल, खसरा नम्बर 99 एंव 99 ( भाग 3 ) के अतिरिक्त , पूर्व में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना का.आ. 1256 दिनांक 21-04-2003 में सम्मिलित है, जिसे अधिसूचना का.आ. 477 दिनांक 7-02-2003, के साथ पढ़ा जाए ।

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004.

[फा. सं. आर- 31015/33/2001- ओ. आर. II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव S.O. 608. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1255 and 1256, dated the 21st April , 2003 , issued under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India, on the 26th April, 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in those notifications for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);

Andwhereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public on the 22nd May 2003;

And Whereas the competent authority has , under Sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And Whereas , the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State: Rajasthan

District : Jodhpur

Tehsil: Luni

Sr. No.

ROU -Area

Biswa

Biga

Part ifAny

Name of Village Khasra No.

Kagnada

150

Sinli

148

147

146

144

141

200

1369

Jhanwar

()

The areas mentioned in this notification , except Khasra No. 99 and 99 (Part -3 ) , are included in the areas mentioned in notification published vide SO 1256 , dated the 21st April 2003 , read with S.O. 477 dated the 7th February 2003 .

[F.No. R- 31015/ 33 / 2001 -OR - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .

1094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 609. - केन्द्रीय सरकार, ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2720 तारीख 19 सितम्बर, 2003 , जो भारत के राजपत्र में तारीख 27 सितम्बर, 2003 , को प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरी लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा मुन्द्रा - भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिन्डा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अाय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त अधिसूचना का प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 22 अक्टूमर, 2003 की उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट है, में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चिय किया है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइल बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा।

अनुसूची

तहसीलं : रावतसर

जिला: हनुमानगढ़

राज्य : राजस्थान

ROU क्षेत्रफल

क्रम सं.

गांव का नाम

खसरा नं

हिस्सा क्रमांक

बीघा बिस्वा 1

कलासर

789

0 11

[फा. सं. आर- 31015/14/2002 ओ. आर. ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004

S.O. 609 .--Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2720 dated the 19th September , 2003 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India , on the 27th September , 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appen ded to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transport of crude oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundar - Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline, by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);

And Whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on the 22nd October , 2003 ;

And Whereas the competent authority in pursuance of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And Whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this notification, should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is 1095 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date ofpublication of the declaration , in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State: Rajasthan

Tehsil : Rawatsar

District : Hanumangarh

RUO-Area

Biswa

Biga

Sr. No.

Party ifAny

Khasra No.

Name of Village

11 789

Kalasar

[F.No. R-31015/14/2002 -OR - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 610.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में, तारीख 20 जनवरी , 2001 को भारत मे राजपत्र में प्रकाशित , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधियूचना संख्या का०आ० 93 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्-

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में , स्तम्भ 1 में, " श्री सुनील शर्मा " शब्दों के स्थान पर " श्री केदार मल गुप्ता " शब्द रखे जाएंगे ।

[सं० आर-31015/50/2000- ओ.आर- I ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिवं

New Delhi the 10 th March, 2004

S. O. 610.- In pursuance of clause ( a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1950 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S. O. 93 published in the Gazette of India on the 20th January , 2001 , namely:-

In the said notification, in the Schedule , in coloumn 1 , for the words " Shri Sunil Sharma, " the words " Shri Kedar Mal Gupta " shall be substituted.

[No. R- 31015 /50/ 2000 -OR- I ]

RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 611.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमियों में जो सभी विल्गमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के प्रयोजन के लिए बिहार राज्य में बरौनी से पटना तक उक्त भूमि मे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है, अतः उस भूमि के बारे में जिसका संक्षिप्त विवरण इस अधियूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट किया गया है, ऐसे प्रचालन को समाप्त किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियम, 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण -1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 8 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों के रूप में घोषित करती है । 689 GI/2004-10 1096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

अनुसूची

का.आ. एवं तारीख

ग्राम का नाम थाना सं .

क्रम सं.

4 1. 2240

लछमीपुर

01 सितम्बर, 2001

पुनारक

रैली

ढीवर

सहनौरा

ममरखाबाद

मोजाहिदपुर

बरिआरपुर

नेआमतपुर 52 2. 2241

जमालपुर

545 01 सितम्बर, 2001

भभौर

548

सबौरा

554 3..

2157

सहरी

60 25 अगस्त, 2001

बीढना

70 4. 2294

गाढ़ोचक

08 सितम्बर, 2001

गोबिन्दपुर कुरथा 16 5. 2295

पंचमहला

28 सितम्बर

मेकरा

36 2007

कन्हाईपुर

सेवनार

बरहपुर

मोर

सुलतानपुर

औटा

चिनतामन चक 29

मोकामाखास

गोशाई गाँव

दरियापुर

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] अंचल. जिला

राज्य

कार्य समाप्ति कीतारीख 5

पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14 अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार

14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारकं

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 पंडारक

पटना

बिहार 14अप्रैल, 2002 तेघरा

बेगुसराय बिहार 29 जुलाई , 2002 तेघरा

बिहार

बेगुसराय

29जुलाई, 2002 तेघरा

बेगुसराय बिहार

29 जुलाई , 2002 बाढ़

पटना

बिहार

23जुलाई 2002 पटना

बाढ़

बिहार

23जुलाई 2002 फतुहा

पटना

बिहार 25अप्रैल, 2002 पटना

फतुहा

बिहार 25अप्रैल, 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30 जुलाई , 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30 जुलाई, 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30 जुलाई, 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30 जुलाई , 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30जुलाई, 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार 30जुलाई , 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30 जुलाई , 2002 मोकामा

पटना

बिहार

30 जुलाई , 2002

मोकामा

पटना

बिहार 30जुलाई , 2002

मोकामा

पटना

बिहार 30जुलाई, 2002

मोकामा

पटना

बिहार 30जुलाई, 2002

मोकामा

पटना

बिहार 30जुलाई, 2002 [सं ० आर-25011/12/2003- ओ.आर -1 ]

रेणका कुमार, अवर सचिव 1097

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2004

S.O. 611.-Whereas, by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S. O. and date as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government acquired the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to those notifications ;

And, whereas, in exercise of the powerswers conferredby sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government vested the right of user in the said land, free from all encumbrances in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas , the competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose oftransport of petroleum products from Barauni to Patna in the State of Bihar has been laid in the said land, so the operation may be terminated in respect of the land, the description of which in brief is specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , as required under explanation- 1 of rule 4 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Rules , 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 8 of the said Schedule as the dates of termination of operation .

Thana No.

Name of village S.O. No. & date

Sl. No.

Lachhmipur 1. 2240

Punarakh

1st September 2001

Raili

Dhibar

Sahnaura

Mamrakhabad

Mojahidpur 51

Bariarpur

Neamatpur

545

Mamalpur 2. 2241

548

Bhabhaur

1st September 2001

554

Sabora

Sahri

3. 2157

Birhana

25th August, 2001

Garhochak 4. 2294

Gobindpur Kurtha 16 8th September, 2001

♡

Pachmahla 5. 2295

Mekra

8th September, 2001

Kanhaipur

Seonar

Barahpur

Mor

Sultanpur

Auta

Chintamanchak 29

Mokama Khas

Goshaingaon

Dariapur

SCHEDULE

State

District

Anchal

Date of terminat- ionof operation

Bihar 14th april, 2002 Pundarakh Patna

Bihar 14thapril , 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14thapril, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14th april, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14th april, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14th april, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14th april, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14thapril, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

Bihar 14th april, 2002 Patna

Pundarakh

29th July, 2002

Bihar

Begusarai

Teghara

Bihar 29th July, 2002 Bagusarai

Teghara

Bihar 29th July, 2002 Begusarai

Teghara

Bihar 23rd July, 2002 Patna

Barh

Bihar

Patna

23rd July, 2002 Barh

Bihar 25thApril, 2002 Patna

Fatuha

Bihar 25thApril, 2002 Patna

Fatuha

Bihar

Patna

30th July, 2002 Mokama

Bihar 30thJuly, 2002 Patna

Mokama

30th July, 2002

Bihar

Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30th July, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30thJuly, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30th July, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30th July, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30thJuly, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30thJuly, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30th July, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30thJuly, 2002 Patna

Mokama

Bihar 30thJuly, 2002 Patna

Mokama

[No. R- 25011 /12/2003 - OR-I ]

RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.

1098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 612.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि उत्तरांचल राज्य में जिला हरिद्वार से होकर उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में सहारनपुर से नजीबाबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के प्रयोजन के लिए, यह आवश्यक है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रेलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा उं की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

उक्त अनूसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में लिखित रूप में आक्षेप श्री राकेश कुमार सिंह, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, सहारनपुर- नजीबाबाद एक्सटैन्शन पाइपलाइन परियोजना, एस.डी.एम. लक्सर का कार्यालय , तहसील लक्सर, हरिद्वार ( उत्तरांचल ) को भेज सकेगा ।

तहसील : नजीबाबाद

जिला: बिजनौर गांव

खसरा नं ० 1

31 शरीफपुर बांगर बिला एहतमाली

42 सादुल्लानगर

268 सौफतपुर

270

272

363 नूरमपुर

48 हरेवली

70 सिकरौडा

49 मुस्सेपुर

182

183

184 किशोरपुर एहतमाली

423 राहुखेडी कौरा

112 अनुसूची

राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

आर

सेन्टी आर 4

[सं. आर.- 25011/27/2002/ओ.आर-1 ]

रेनुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th March, 2004

S.O. 612. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transporiation of petroleum products from Saharanpur to Najibabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh via District Haridwar (Uttaranchal ) , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

1099

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

And whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right ofuser in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date onwhich the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Saharanpur -Najibabad Extension Pipeline Project, Office of the S.D.M. Laksar , Tehsil- Laksar , Haridwar (Uttaranchal) .

District: Bijnor Tehsil : Najibabad

Khasra No. Village

2 1

31 Sharifpur Bangart Bila Ahtmali

19 Sadullanagar

268 Saufatpur

270

272

363

48 Noorampur

70 Harevali

49 Sikroda

182 Mussepur

183

184

423 Kishorpur Ahtmali

112 Rahu Kheri Kaura

SCHEDULE

State: Uttar Pradesh

Area

Centiares Are

Hectare

[No. R. - 25011/ 27/2002 -OR - I]

RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy:

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 613.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में सहारनपुर से नजीबाबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब , केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रेलियम और खजिन पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

उक्त अनूसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, उस भूमि में इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे 1100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में लिखित रूप में आक्षेप श्री लोकेन्द्र पाल सिंह, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, सहारनपुर- नजीबाबाद 'एक्सटेन्शन पाइपलाइन परियोजना, सक्षम प्राधिकारी का कार्यालय , के-33 , पल्लवपुरम , फेस-2 , मेरठ ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) को भेज सकेगा । तहसील: रूड़की

जिला: हरिद्वार गांव

खसरा सं ० 1

2 डाडली

290 सरढेडी शाहजहाँपुर

235/4

235/17

179/2 चुड़ियाला मोहनपुर

खाताखेड़ी

44 सफरपुर

84 बलेलपुर मजरा पनियाला चंदापुर

120/1 अमरपुरकाजी

956 पाड़ली गुजर

949

365 मोहनपुर मोहम्मदपुर

364

380

432

433 आसिफनगर

222 लढ़ौरा

303 थथौला

343 अनुसूची

राज्य उत्तरांचल

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

आर

सेन्टीआर 3

50 00

19 00

00 00

55 00

00 00

95 00

30 00

80 00

50 00

17 00

32 00

20 00

02 00

00 00

[सं. आर. - 25011/11/2003- ओ.आर- I ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th March, 2004

S.O. 613. Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Saharanpur to Najibabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Lokendra PalSingh . Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Saharanpur - Najibabad Extension Pipeline Project , Office of the Competent Authority , K- 33 , Pallavpuram, Phase - II , Meerut (Uttar Pradesh) .

1101

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

District: Haridwar Tehsil : Roorkee

Khasra No. Village

2 1

51 Dadli

290 Sarthedi Shahjahanpur

235/4

235/17

179/2 Chudiala Mohanpur

44 KhataKhedi

2 Safarpur

84 Balelpur Majra Paniala

120/1 AmarpurKazi

956 PadliGujar

949

365 Mohanpur Mohammadpur

364

380

432

433

222 AsifNagar

303 Landhaura

343 Thathaula

SCHEDULE

State : Uttaranchal

Area

Hectare

Are

Centiare 3

[No. R -25011 / 11 / 2003 -OR - I ]

RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004 का.आ. 614.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि गुजरात राज्य में विरमगाम से हरियाणा राज्यमें पानीपत तक राजस्थान राज्य में चाकसूसे होती हुई अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम- चाकसू, चाकसू पानीपत व चाकसू- मथुरा सेक्शन के संवर्द्धन " के कार्यान्वयन के लिए एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में लिखित रूप में आक्षेप , श्री आर. एम. पंड्या, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, ( पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) पो.बा.सं. 4 , डाकघर विरमगाम , जिला- अहमदाबाद, गुजरात -382150 को कर सकेगा । 1102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ].

अनुसूची

जिला: पाटण

तालुका: सिध्धपुर

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे सं.

उप-खण्डसं.

हेक्टर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

107

सिध्धपुर

115

112

113

146

147

152

151

156

[फा.सं. आर.- 25011/19/2001- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

S.O. 614. Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of crude oil from Viramgam in the State of Gujarat to Panipat in the State of Haryana via Chaksu in the State of Rajasthan , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Augmentation of Viramgam - Chaksu , Chaksu - Panipat and Chaksu -Mathura sections of Salaya -Mathura pipeline System";

And , whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification; Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Rigth of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein; Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R. M. Pandya . Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipelines Division) , P. B. No. 4 P.O. Viramgam , Distt. Ahmedabad , Gujarat - 382150.

SCHEDULE

District : Patan

Taluka: Sidhpur

State: Gujarat

Area

Hectare

Are

Name of the Village Survey No. Sub -Division No.

Sq. mtr.

107

Sidhpur

115

112

113

146

147

152

151

00 1103

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

151

156

[F. No. R-25011 / 19/2001 -OR - I ] RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy :

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 615. केन्द्रीय सरकार, साधारण खंड अधिनियम, 1897 की धारा 21 के साथ पठित पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 (अ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत के राजपत्र भाग II, खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 1 जून, 2002 के पृष्ठ 5230 से पृष्ठ 5231 तक पर प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 1803 तारीख 30 मई, 2002 को विखंडित करती है ।

[सं. आर-25011 /9/2004- ओ.आर-1 ]

रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

S.O. 615. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 2 (a) of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) read with Section 21 of the General Clauses Act , 1897, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1803 dated the 30th May, 2002 published in the Gazette of India dated 1st June , 2002 Part- II Section -3 , Sub-section ( ii ) at pages 5230 to 5231 .

[No. R-25011/9/2004 OR - I ] RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy .

श्रम मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 616.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 अप्रैल , 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा-76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -

जिला

तहसील

हदबस्तसंख्या

राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

क्र.सं.

फतेहगढ़ चन्ना

धौला

हण्डिया

3 .

सिवियां

गिलंकलां

पत्ती दरमरी

शोल

सधनी

काला

संगरूर

बरनाला

संगरूर

बरनाला

संगरूर

बरनाला

बठिण्डा

बठिण्डा 40

रामपुरा फुल

बठिण्डा

रामपुरा फुल

193

बठिण्डा

रामपुरा फुल

190

बठिण्डा

रामपुरा फुल

189

बठिण्डा

रामपुरा फुल

192

[सं.: एस-38013/ 13/2004- एस.एस. - 1 ]

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 10th March, 2004

S.O. 616. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the 689G1/2004-11 1104,

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004 / PHALGUNA 23 , 1925 [PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI ( except Sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely:-

Sl . No.

Name of Revenue Village 1 .

Fatehgarh Channa 2.

-Dhaula

Handia

Sivian

Gill Kalan

Pati Darmari

Shoal

Sadhani

Kala

Head Bast No. Tehsil

District 57

Barnala

Sangrur 55

Barnala

Sangrur 58

Barnala

Sangrur 71

Bhatinda

Bhatinda 40

Rampura Phul Bhatinda 193

Rampura Phul Bhatinda 190

Rampura Phul Bhatinda 189

Rampura Phul Bhatinda 192

Rampura Phul Bhatinda

[No. S - 38013 /13/2004 - SS.I ]

K. C. JAIN , Director नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का०आ० 617. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकारा एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल , 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा-76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77,78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्-

क्रमांक

राजस्व ग्राम का नाम 1.

हम्बड़ा

भट्टाधुआँ

गौसपुरा

रानके

सालम

हदबस्त सख्या

जिला

2-जे

लुधियाना

131

लुधियाना

132

लुधियाना

[सं. एस -38013/12/2004 - एस . एस. - 1 ]

के.सी. जैन , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 10th March, 2004

S.O. 617.- Jn exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insur- ance Act . 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April, 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (except Sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely:-

Name of Revenue Village

1. Hambran

2. Bhatta Dlaman

3. Gaunspura

4. Ranke

5. Salem

Head Bast No.

Tehsil and District

2-J

Ludhiana

131

Ludhiana

132

Ludhiana

[No.S -38013/12/2004 - SS- I ]

K.C. JAIN , Director

नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2004

का०आ ० 618.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 1105 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77, 78 ,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्-

" जिला गोरखपुर की तहसील- सहजनवां एवं सदर के राजस्व परगना - भौवापार एवं हसनपुर ( मगहर ) स्थित गोरखपुर इण्डस्ट्रियल डवलपमैण्ट अथॉरिटी (गीड़ा) के अन्तर्गत आने वाले सभी राजस्व ग्राम " ।

[सं. एस-38013/14/2004- एस. एस. - 1 ] के.सी. जैन, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 10th March, 2004

S.O. 618.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI ( except Sub-section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely :-

Areas comprising the revenue villages , falling under the Gorakhpur Industrial Development Authority (GIDA) , in the revenue Pargana -Bhauwapar & Hasanpur (Maghar) in Tehsil - Sahjanwa and Sadar in the District of Gorakhpur. "

[No.S - 38013 /14/2004 - SS - I ]

K.C. JAIN, Director

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

का०आ ० 619.- केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 3009 दिनांक 30-9-2003 द्वारा बैंकिंग उद्योग जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 2 में शामिल है, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 30-9-2003 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की यह राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है;

अतः अब , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 30-3-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[फा. सं . एस-11017/5/97- आई. आर. ( पी . एल. ) ]

जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

S.O. 619.- Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of the clause ( in ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947). declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 3009 dated 3-9-2003 the services in the Banking Industry which is covered by item 2 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 30th September, 2003 .

And whereas , the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months .

Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi ) of clause ( n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility scrvice for the purposes of the said Act for a period of six months from the 30th March, 2004 .

[No. S - 11017 /5 / 97 - IR (PL ) ]

J.P. PATI , Jt . Secy .

1106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 17 नवम्बर , 2003

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , vide their order No. L- 22012/215 /2001 - IR ( CM- II) dt. 11-9-2002 referred following issue for adjudication to this Tribunal:

का.आ. 620.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी.आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ ( संदर्भ संख्या 162/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the Senior Regional Manager, FCI , Lucknow in not regularising the services of workmen of gang no . 16 FSD Agra from the period 1-5-99 to 4-6-99 and deducting wages is legal and justified? ifnot, to what relief the workmen are entitled to ?"

[सं . एल-22012/215/2001- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 17th November , 2003

S.O. 620. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 162/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court. Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-11-2003

[No. L- 22012/215 /2001 -IR (CM -II) ]

N. P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT :

SHRIKANT SHUKLA

PRESIDING OFFICER

The worker's case in brief is that the dispute arose as the management of Food Corporation of India represented by Sr. Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India , Lucknow and District Manager , FCI , Agra when transferred Gang No. 16 and its Ancillary labourers from FCI , FSD , Agra Cantt. to PSD , Basti . The District Manager of FCI is not at all allowed to issue transfer order of any worker in which jurisdiction of other District Manager is involved . It is also stated that the FSD , Basti falls under the District Manager, Gorakhpur. In pursuance of the order of transfer dt. 30-4-99 the District Manager FCI , Agra Cantt. relived theGang No. 16 on 30-4-99 . The workman's case is that the District Manager , FCI , Agra has no authority to relieve GangNo. 16 for joining at FCI , FSD , Basti. Subsequently FCI , Agra realised their wrong action therefore they cancelled the transfer order and allowed the workmen to resume their work w.e.f. 5-6-99 . Now the management that District Manager , FCI , Agra is bent upon and issued notices to the concerned workers to apply leave for the period from 1-5-99 to 4-6-99 or their wages will be deducted in lumpsum from their salaries which was given to them . The wages were released to workers on the undertaking in writing from each workers on 4-4-2000 . The management of the FCI has broken the continuity in service from 1-5-99 to 4-6-99 after deducting the wages in unlawful and unjustified manner . Therefore the management must regularise the services 1-5-99 to 4-6-99.

I.D. NO . 162/2002

Ref. No. L - 22012 /215 /2001 - IR (CM- II) dt . 11-9-2002

BETWEEN

The Opposite Party has denied the allegations of the workers union and has stated that the transfer orders were issued under the rules and there is no malafide , but the worker fail to join the place to which they were transferred . And such they are not entitled to pay.

Sh . Shareef Hussain, Chairman Food corporation of India Workers Union, 16 , Ashoka Road, NewDelhi .

Sri K.L. Arora District Manager , FCI, Agra alongwith his advocate Sri Syeed Hasseb appeared in the court today onbehalf ofthe management and Sri M. Shakeel A/R of the Union and the worker Sri R.P. Singh appeared today.

AND

1 The Sr. Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India , 5-6 Habibulah Estate, Hazratganj , Luckknow

2. The District Manager , Food Corporation of India 60/4 Sanjay Place Agra ( U.P. )

Parties present have filed the compromise A- 19 : The parties, have come forward and state that they have entered in compromise in Lok Adalat and the parties have agreed thatworkers of Gang No. 16 , FSD , Agra including ancillary labour were lawfully transferred to FCI , Basti , however , workers due to exegencies of work could notjoin at Basti and subsequently said order was cancelled and the workers of Gang No. 16 & 5 ancillary labour of PSD , Agra were retained at Agra which resulted in service break .

1107

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Management has agreed to nurture good relation with employees and union and has agreed to regularise workers absence by sanctioning leave it they are dues to them and in case leave is not due the same should be adjusted from the leave due in future . The management also agreed to pay wages for a bsence period in case that is deducted.

Workmenunion representative Sri M. Shakeel agree that the union has agreed as it will create harmonious relationship between employees and employer.

Parties requested that issue referred may kindly be disposed of.

The issue referred is finally and effectively disposed inview of compromise A- 19 , Issue is answered accordingly. The compromise paper No. A- 19 shall form the part ofthe award.

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer BEFORE CGIT - CUM-LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

Case No. 162/2002

BETWEEN

S.R.M. FCI Luckknow , Distt. Manager FCI Agra

AND

Shri Sharif Hussain , Chairman , FCI , Workers Union, NewDelhi.

Sir,

The Parties have arrived at compromise in Lok Adalat-Parties agree that the workers of Gang No. 16 FSD, Agra including 05 Ancillary labour were lawfully transferred toBasti , However , the workers due to exigencies could not join at Basti and subsequently said order was cancelled &workers of Gang No. 16 and 05 ancillary labour of FSD Agra were returned at Agra. This resulted in service break.

Management has agreed to nurture good relation with employees with the union to regularise their absence by sanctioning leaves if they are due to them and in case leave is not dues the same shall be adjusted from leaves due in future , managment also agrees to pay wages for the absence period in case that is deducted . Workman union represented by Shri M. Shakeel (A.R. ) agreed that union has agreed as it will creat harmonious relationship between the employer & employees .

Accordingly the issue referred & finally disposed off.

Sd/-

(Shri M. Shakeel )

Ex . M.L.A. & Authorised Representative

Sd/- (Shri K.L. Arora) Distt. Manager60/4 , Food Corporation of India SanjayPlace

Agra forF.C.I. Workers Union 16, Ashok Road , New Delhi .

Present Sri K.L. Arora , District Manager , FCI alongwith his counsel Sri Sayeed Hassen for employer and Sri M. Shakeel A/R of FCI,Workers Union, Ashok Road, New Delhi and Sri R.P. Singh the worker for union .

Partieswere read over this compromise in English as well as explained in Hindi and were asked whether they have filed compromise willingly without undue influence. Persons present stated that they knew context fully well and has compromised. The case I.D. No. 162/2002 . Sri M. Shakeel stated that he has full authority on behalf of the union to compromise and signed the documents .

PRESIDING OFFICER नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

का. आ. 621.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 111/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/54/97- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एन. पी . केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004 S. O. 621. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 111/ 98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour CourtsII , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-04 .

[No. L -20012/54/97 -IR(C- 1) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 )(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 11 of 1998

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management M/ s B.C.C.L. and theirworkman.

1108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workmen : None .

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate .

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 28th January , 2004

AWARD

The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 54/97-1R ( Coal- l ) dated the 13th April, 1998 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the General Manager Bhalgora Area of M/ s . BCCL , P.O. Bhalgora , Dist. Dhanbad in denying employment to the dependent son Pappoo ignoring her application under VRS (F) Scheme after accepting her resignation is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to ? "

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT

SHRI B. BISWAS,

PresidingOfficer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 45 of 2001

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management IISCO and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

3 Onbehalf ofthe workmen : None .

Onbehalfof the employers : Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand

2. Ir. this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . Management however made appearance through their learned Advocate . It reveals from the record that the instant reference is pending since 1998 and no step has been taken from either side . Repcated notices were also issued but no fruitful result yeilded . Under such circumstances , a ' No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of No dispute Award presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

का. आ. 622. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II, धनबाद के पंत्राट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकर को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं . एल-20012/449/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1) ]

एन. पी . केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi . the 13th February, 2004 S. O. 622. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Labour Court CII . Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IISCO and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 13-2-04 .

[No. L -20012/449/ 2000 - IR(C - 1 ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

Industry: Coal

Dhanbad, Dated, the 28th January , 2004

AWARD

TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/ 449/2000 ( C- 1 ) ) dated the 19th February , 2001 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. in not regularising the services of Sri Nirmal Mandal , Pers . No. 2901 Sri Ahmed , H.G. Pers . No. 2319 and Sri Jogeshwar Bhuia , Pers . No. 2870 as Pump Operator is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief are the workmen entitled and from what date ?"

2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. Management , however , made their appearance through their learned Advocate. This case is pending since 2001. It reveals from the record that inspite of giving several opportunities parties have failed to take any step in the matter of taking up hearing of this case. It shows clearly that the parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case , for which this Tribunal cannot adjourn the case suo moto for days together . Under such circumstances , a No dispute Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of No dispute Award presuming non- existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 1109 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

करना तथा इस आदेश को वापस लेकर दि. 11-2-92 से 'डिसमिस' करना विधिवत् उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत का पात्र है ? " का. आ. 623.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार, एअर इंडिया लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-I , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआं था ।

[सं. एल-11012/71/98 - आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004

2. The workman was working as a Head Security Guard. he was issued a charge sheet dated 13/10/1990 on the ground of Habitual absence . The workman remained absent from 23/8/1990 to 11/10/1990 . It is alleged in the statement of claim read with the rejoinder that pursuance to the allegations in the charge sheet the workman was removed from service by order dated 19/3/1991 . The order of removal was withdraw and the order of dismisal was passed on 11/2/1992 . The workman alleged in the rejoinder that he had admitted the charges in the departmental enquiry under the advise of his superior officer who misled him.

S. O. 623. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court I , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-04 .

[No. L - 11012/ 71 /98 - IR(C- 1 ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 1 ) AT MUMBAI

PRESENT

SHRI JUSTICE S. C. PANDEY

Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT - 16/1999

PARTIES:

3. The company stated that workman was served with charge sheet dated 13/10/1990 as per Model Standing Orders . He did not submit any explanation . It was alleged that a fair enquiry was held against the workman. The workman was found to have committed the misconduct On 12/1/1991 a show cause notice was issued against the workman against for showing cause why he should not be dismissed . The workman went to the office of the Competent Disciplinary Authority . The workman was asked to report on duty but he did not join even after 25/2/1991. The workman's past record was not good as indicated in paragraph 3 of. Therefore , order of dismissal dated 19/3/1991 . The workman was given further opportunity to improve himselfby withdrawing the order . The workman was asked to join duties thereafter. When the workman did not join the order dated 11/2/92 was passed. it was also pleaded that workman had raised the industrial dispute after considerable lapse of time . The delay has affected the merits of his case . It was pleaded that this tribunal had granted approval to the order of dismissal.

Employers in relation to the management of Air India and their workman.

APPEARANCES :.

:Mr. Benny Francis , Adv .

For the Management

:Mr. Kinnarker , Adv .

For the Workman

: Maharashtra

State

Mumbai , Dated , the 30th day of January , 2004

AWARD

1. This is a reference under clause (d) of Sub section

1 and Sub section 2A of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Act for short ) for rendering the award byway of adjudication upon the industrial dispute between Air India Ltd. ( the company or short ) and S. T. Sonar (the workman for short ) . The terms of the dispute are as follows:

The workman admitted in his affidavit that he received the charge sheet dated 13/10/1990 . He admitted on 21/12/1990 he had given a statement admitting his misconduct. It was stated by him that on his admission the enquiry committee did not hold any enquiry . Ultimately order dated 19/3/91 was passed . On 22/1/1992 that order was withdrawn . A fresh show cause notice was issued to dated 22/1/1992 was served to him for showing cause why he should not be dismissed from service . Thereafter, the impugned order of dismissal dated 4/4/1991 was passed. Theworkman filed another affidavit . In his affidavit he tried to say that he was under medical treatment during the period. His plea was that the enquiry was a farce. He filedthird affdavit on 9/4/2002. His affidavit is no different earlier. The workman admitted that his signatures on letter dated 21/12/90 and 25/2/91 in cross examination . he admitted that he was present on 21/12/90 . He admitted that he was present in the enquiry . He stated that the enquiry continued in his presence .ence. He stated that he was requesting for reinstatement since 1992. The company " क्या एअर इण्डिया के प्रबंधतन्त्र द्वारा दि. 19-3-91 से श्री एस. टी. सोनार हैड सिक्यूरिटी गार्ड को सेवा से' रिमूव ' 1110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

deemed to be in service as if order dated 19/3/91 was not applicable to him.

examined Shri Katak UK. He was convenor of the enquiry . The other member of the enquiry committee examinedby the company was K. A. Khan . Both these witnesses have stated in their respective affidavits that 21/12/90 the workman admitted in Marathi that he had committed the misconduct . In view of the admission there was no enquiry held as it was not necessary . Both these witnesses were cross examined . it was sought to be shown that there was some kind of interpolation. However , this was not what workman said in his affedavit. The workman himselfhad admitted that he had given writing in his own hand. No cross examination was directed against the tacitnesses that they have used force or coercion. These appears to be no violation of principles of natural justic . Nor are the findings are perverse .

8. The next question is that if the company was justified in passing the order of the dismissal deted 11/2/91 . The tribunal has compared the orders dated 19/3/91 and the order dated 11/2/92 . In fact the order 11/2/92 from paragraph 2 onwards is identical in words as order dated 19/3/91 . There is no application of mind. Therefore , the question arises why the order of dismissal was passed instead ofearlier order of removal. The explanation appears to be ulat the workman did not join after he received the notice ofthe withdrawal of order dated 19/3/91 on 22/1/92 . The order of January 22, 1992 at page 15 of record did not require the workman to join. Nor was he told he shall be denied to be under suspension if accepted the option . The workman has denied the oral suggestion that on 25/2/91 he was called on duty and that he was not available.

5. The company has filed affidavit of R. V. Madgi . He proved the absence of workman for the period he was charge sheeted . In cross examination of this witness nothing substantial has been brought for disbelieving the witness . Thus even on merits it appears the workman had no case . He did not apply for medical leave as he was claiming now.

9. Thus looking to the facts and circumstances of the case it wouldbe proper to hold that workman shali be deemed to be in service between 19/3/91 to 23/2/92 . He will be entitled to the wages for the period. The punishment orderdated 11/2/91 is modified to that ofremoval instead of the order dismissal . This order shall be effective from 23/2/92 when the workman was served . The workman shall getback wages for the period between 19/3/91 to 23/2/92 as he was deemed to be on service . He shall also get all the consequential benefits arising on account of modification of the order dismissal into that of removal : No costs .

The reference is thus answered in terms paragraph 9 above .

S. C. PANDEY, Presiding officer . नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004.

6. It appears from the record of the case that the workman was removed by order dated 19/3/1991 . The order was communicated on 9/4/91 . It became effective from that date. On January 1992. the order of removal was withdrawn . A fresh show cause notice was issued to the workman on 22/1/1992 . In this show cause the proposed penalty was the penalty for dismissal . It appears that this notice was served on the workman because the High Court ofDelhi in W.P. 637 of 1988 had directed the Model Standing Order shall apply . The action appears to have been taken with a viewto satisfy the order of the Delhi High Court. The fresh notice was a detailed notice requiring the workman to show cause why he should not be punished with dismissal.

का. आ. 624.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ब्रिटिश एअरवेज के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , नईदिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 144/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11012/23/99- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004

S. O. 624. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 144/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of British Airways and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-04 .

7. This tribunal is therefore , required to consider the effect of the withdrawal of order of removal dated 19/3/91 passed against the workman . It appears that the order dated 19/3/91 was passed after service of show cause notice dated 12/2/91 . It appears that there was some dispute in that notice which was not in accordance with model standing arders . Therefore , the order dated 19/3/91 was withdrawn . Since the company had committed a mistake it could correct it without causing prejudice to the rights of the workinan. The workman could have refused to accept legal consquences of fresh notice because he had ceased to be in service from date of communication of the order i.c. 4/4/1991 . The company could not compel him to accept the notice dated 22/1/92 and act upon it as if he was still in service . The other option to the workman was to accept offer of the company given by notice dated 22/1/92 and reply to show cause notice of the same date . From the stand taken by the workman it appears that he had claimed the second option. Thus the consequence of withdrawal of order dated 19/3/91 shall be that workman shall be

[No. L - 11012/23 /99 - IR( C- 1 )] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer 1111 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

and unjustified. The order of reference is incompetent and bad in law.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL: CUM LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEWDELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER :

L.D. No. 144/99

R. N. RAL

IN THE MATTER OF :-

MRS. IRA KAREER

VERSUS

Ithas been further submitted that the claimant was appointed as a Cabin Crew Member in terms of letter of appointmentdt. August 21,1997 initially on training and probation for a period of six months . The work and performance of the claimant was not found satisfactory and she was apprised about the same from time to time. The management would have terminated her services on expiry of the period of probation but further opportunity of six months was given and she was specifically informed that in case she did not perform her duties satisfactorily , she would be terminated on the expiry of the extended periodofprobation.

BRITISH AIRWAYS

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour vide its letter dt. 28.4.1999 has referred the following point for decision . The point runs as hereunder :-

It has further submitted that her performance was closely monitored and she was told orally as well as in writing regarding her work and performance during the extended period of probation as there was no improvement during the next period of probation , it was decided to terminate her services and accordingly by letterdt. October 3, 1998, the claimant was informed that her services have come to an end .

"Whether the action of the management of the British Airways, New Delhi in terminating the services of Mrs. Ira Kareer , Ex. Air Stewardess , w.e.f. 3.10.1998 is justified, valid and legal ? Ifnot to what relief she is entitled to ?"

It has been further stated that it has wrong to say that during her first probation period , her performance was excellent . There is no substance in it. She had been informed time and again to improve her performance, but to no effect. Her services were not abruptly terminated on October 3 , 1998 but the period ofprobation was extended and still her performance was found unsatisfactory, Therefore , no option was left with the management but to terminate her services. The management has denied receipt of the legal notice, the raising ofdispute in conciliation has been admitted. The claimant was on probation and she had no right to the post. Her services were rightly terminated and her performance was not found satisfactory in the second extended period ofprobation.

The claimant has filed the statement of claim . It has been stated in the statement of claim that the workman was issued an appointment letter on 21-08-1997 for the post of CabinCrewMember in Delhi (India) w.e.f. 20-08-1997 which she accepted and she had been functioning as such since 3.10.1997 . It has been further submitted that the appointment was on probation for a period of 6 months but despite excellent performance and assessment to be the best ofall the crew members for the best reasons known to the management , the probation period was extended further for a period of 6 months more . After the expiry of first probation, period, she was confident about her performance but she was disturbed. Therefore, the management in an arbitrary manner terminated the services w.e.f. 3.10.1998 illegally , wrongfully , and unjustifiably and without completing the legal formalities under the I.D. Act . The representation was given which has been marked as Annexure-A. The workman was not reinstated despite service legal notices which has been marked as Annexure "B" . The workman had no other alternative but to file the claim before Conciliation for her reinstatement but that too failed due to the rigid attitude of the management and thereupon the reference was made to this Tribunal .

Theworkman has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder, the allegations of written statement have been denied and it has been emphatically stated that she performed her services satisfactorily. The duties performed by the claimant are of skilled nature and as such falls within the ambit of Section 2 (s) of the ID Act, 1947. The dispute has rightly been referred to this Tribunal. The management is guilty of unfair legal practice. The termination of his services was wrong and unjustified. The management did not act in a bonafide way . The written statement and the preliminary objections are denied. Some paras of the written statement are misconceived . The claimant was never told orally or in writing regarding unsatisfactory service. Her services were terminated under the guise of probation period and it is against the principles of natural justice , equity and fair play.

Heard arguments from both the sides .

The management has filed written statement- In his written statement, it has been stated that she was appointed admittedly as an Air Stewardess and main duties performed by her were not manual , unskilled, skilled , technical , operational or clerical in nature and the claimant is not a workman as defined in Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

It was argued from the side of the workman that no enquiry has been held and it cannot be said that her work It isobligatory and incumbent upon the claimant to prove as to how the termination of her services was illegal

689GI/2004-12 1112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] was not satisfactory . If during probation period , the work ofthe probationer is found unsatisfactory, then an enquiry should be held to prove that in what respect the work was unsatisfactory. In case during probation period an employee is removed , a stigma is attached to him and he could not be able to get service anywhere else .

The Preliminary Objections raised by the management is that the dispute raised is not industrial dispute so the order of reference is incompetent and bad in law on this ground also . While deciding issue No.1 , I have already mentioned that Miss Ira Kareer was a workman under Section 2 (S) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. As such the order ofreference cannot be said to be incompetent and bad in law on this ground because she was working admittedly in an industry and she was a workman so the order of reference is competent and not bad in law for the reasons stated in paras 2 and 3 of the Preliminary Objections to the written statement on behalf of the management.

This issue is decided accordingly .

The written arguments has been filed from the side of the management . My attention was drawn to 1995 - I ILJ at page 303 in which the definition of workman has been given . In 1982 LIC at page 551 , it has been held that the party challenging the termination should prove the claim. It has also been held so in 1979 II ILJat page 194 and 1984 (49) FLR at page 38 and 1994 LLR at page 543 and citation has been given of UCO bank versus the Presiding Officer and another . In all the citations , it has been held that the partywhich wants any relief or pleading is to be proved by evidence . In case evidence is not adduced , the relief shall fail . It is obvious that the rulings established that the plaintiff or the claimant has to prove his claim or pleadings in absence of evidence of either of the parties, the pleadings cannot be said to have been proved.

The learned counsel for the management arguedthat two issues have been framed.

( 1) . Whether Ms. Ira Kareer is a workman as defined in Section 2( s ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?

(2). Whether the order of reference is incompetent and bad in law for the reasons stated in paras 2 and 3 of the preliminary objections to the written statement filed on behalf of the management ?

None of the parties have led any evidence so the casewas fixed for hearing. No enquiry was also admittedly as to how the performance of Miss Ira Kareer was not found satisfactory . She was appointed on August 21 , 1997 initially on training and probation for a period of 6 months. It has been averred in the written statement that her work was not found satisfactory so further a 6 month probation was given to her but it has no here been stated in the written statement that on what ground , the services of Miss Ira Kareer was not satisfactory. In case her services were not satisfactory , an enquiry ought to have been held and by enquiry , it could be established whether her work was satisfactory or not only by giving her legal notices and saying that her services were not satisfactory is not sufficient for removal of a probationer. In that case, a stigma will be attached with the probationer and until an enquiry is held, it cannot be said to be proved that the work of a particular probationer was unsatisfactory . Since no enquiry has been held, her services cannot be terminated on the ground of unsatisfactory service .

No evidence is required in this case. As the claimant is a workman and the citations of the management are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case.

She deserves to be reinstated that 25 % back wages and after an enquiry regarding her services, any action can be taken against her.

The point referred to is replied thus :-

The first issue is whether Ms. Ira Kareer is a workman or not. She has been appointed admittedly at the post of Stewercress . Now the question arises as to Stewardess commender the definition of the workman or not. The wc.a. towardess has been defined in Oxford Dictionary as ape son who looks after the passengers of a ship or aircraft and a person responsible for supply of food to a college , club etc. and an official appointed to supervise arrangements at a large public event or a person employed to manage another's property specially in a large house. When we consider the meaning given in the Oxford Di. tionary, the Stewardess simply means a workman who looks after the passengers on a ship or aircraft . As such the: duty ofMiss Ira Kareer was to look after the passengers on a ship.

Theaction of the management ofthe British Airways, New Delhi terminating the services ofMiss Ira Kareer, Ex- Air Stewardess w.e.f. 3-10-1998 is neitherjustified nor legal. She is entitled to be reinstated from the date of termination ofher services with 25% back wages .

Dated: 09-02-04

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer According to the definition of the workman of the I.D. Act, a manual unskilled, skilled, technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work is considered to be the work of a workman and a person who performs supervisory work comes under the category of workman in the I.D. Act .

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी, 2004

Miss Ira Kareer was to look after the passengers of an aeroplane. As such her work was supervisory and accordingly to the definitions of the workman in the I.D. Act, shewas a workman under Section 2 ( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. This issue is decided accordingly.

का. आ. 625.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी सी एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अधिकरण- II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 154/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-20012/170/99- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004 S. O. 625. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 154/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court II Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-04 .

[No. L-20012/170/99 - IR(C- 1 )]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

SHRIB . BISWAS, Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 )(d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947.

Reference No. 154 of 2001

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Kathara Colliery ofM/ s . CCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

On behalf of the workman :

Advocate. Mr. K. Chakravorty , On behalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma,

Advocate .

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal..

Dated, Dhanbad, the 28th January , 2004

AWARD

1. The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 170/99 C-I dated, the 8th May , 2001.

SCHEDULE

KYA BIHAR COLLIERY KAMGAR UNION KI C.C.L KATHARA COLLIERY KEY PRAVANDHTANTRASEY MANG KISHI MANU RAM SEY SECURITY GUARD KI JANMA TARIKH 2-1-1943 KEY STHAN PAR 30-4-48 (30-4-77 KO 22 VARSH MANTEY HUYA)

1113 SAHIKI JAYA, UCHIT EVAMNAYASANGAT HAI ? YADI HAN TO KARMKAR KIS RAHAT KEY PATRA HAI ?"

2. In this reference both the parties appeared and filed their respective written statement . However in course ofhearing the concerned workman personally by filing a petition submitted to pass a ' No dispute ' Award in this case as he is not interested to proceed with further hearing of this case . He also submitted that necessary direction may be given to the management to release his retirement benefits to the concerned workman , Heard both sides also the concerned workman . Learned Advocate for the management submitted that if a ' No dispute ' is passed in that case they will release the retirement benefits to the concerned workman . In view of the facts and circumstances , a ' No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of ' No dispute ' Award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties presently. However , necessary direction is given to the management to release all the retirement benefits to the concerned workman within three months from the date ofpublication of the Award in the Gazette of India.

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

का. आ. 626. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण -11 . धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/487/2000- आई.आर. (सी-1 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004 S. O. 626. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court - II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IISCO and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-04 .

[No. L - 20012/487/2000 - IR(C - 1 ) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD Present: SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer 1114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

In.the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 .

Reference No. 69 of 2001

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Chasnalla Colliery ofM/ s . IISCO . Ltd. and their workman,

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. N.G. Arun,

representative of the concerned workman.

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate .

State

: Jharkhand

: Coal .

Industry

Dated, Dhanbad, the 5th January, 2004

AWARD

1. The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) ( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012 /487/ 2000 (C - I ) , dated , the 19th February , 2001 .

SCHEDULE

" KYA Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Union Ki Mang ki IISCO Chasnalla Colliery Key Pravandhtantra Dwara Shri Lakhan Mahato Ko Varsh 1979 Sey Grade III , Varsh 1980 Sey Grade II , Varsh 1987 Sey Grade I Tatha Varsh 1994 Sey special Grade Diya Jaya Nayachot Tarksangat Evam Niyamanusar Hai ? Yadi Han To Karmakar Kis Rahat Key Patra Hai ? " 2. In this reference a settlement has been filed by the parties under their signature . Perused the terms of setlement and also heard both sides . I find that the terms contained therein are fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice . Accordingly I accept the said settlement and pass an Award in terms thereof which forms part of the Award as Annexure .

B. BISWAS Presiding Officer .

FORM - II

Memorandum of settlement arrived at between the management of IISCO . Chasnalla Colliery and the workman represented by R.C.M.S. , Chasnalla branch on 12-2-01 at Chasnalla Colliery .

Representing the Manage- ment

Representing Union/ Workman

Shri S.S. Rahman,

Shri K.I. Robi ,

[PART II SEC . 3( ii) ] SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE

TheOrg. Secretary, RCMS, Rajendra Path, Dhanbad raisedanIndustrial Dispute before the ALC (C) IV, Dhanbad overpromotion of Sri Lakhan Mahato . , P/No . 9882 to the post of Record Keeper in Clerical Grade - II under the Management of Chasnalla Colliery of M/s . IISCO . LTD. , Dhanbad.

The dispute was registerd at ALC ( C) level on 12-2-99 vide I.D. No. I (10) 98/E-2 and both the parties were called there for conciliation, which was adjourned on different dates . Ultimately the ALC ( C) held the dispute FOCwith an advise to settle the dispute amicably at Colliery level, which was agreed by both the parties . On 12-01-2001 Shri Lakhan Mahato appealed to the ALC ( C ) Dhanbad with the copies to the union and the Management to consider his case with promotion with immediate effect in ClericalGrade - II with notional seniority from the date of raising the dispute i.e. from 12-2-99 to 28-02-2001 . And thus the same was agreed on the following terms and conditions of settlement .

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

1. That theManagement of IISCO . Chasnalla Colliery agreed to promote Sri Lakhan Mahato in the designation ofRecord Keeper in Clerical Grade- II with effect from 01-03-2001 .

2. That Sri Lakhan Mahato shall get Notional Seniority in Clerical Grade - II from the date of lodgingdispute i.e. from 12-2-99 to 28-02-2001 as Recrod Keeper, whereby he shall not be entitled to any monetary benefit.

3. That the dispute resolves in full and final and in all the respect.

4. That this promotion to Shri Lakhan Mahato shall remain personal to him and will not set any precedent in future.

5. That this promotion to Sri Lakhan Mahato will not be deemed as on merit rather this will be entiraly on discrection ofManagement of IISCO . Chasnalla Colliery.

6. That Shri Lakhan Mahato or any union on his behalf shall not raise any dispute in this effect in future.

7. That both the parties shall submit the implementation report to the ALC (C) IV, Dhanbad within 90 days of the settlement.

Repersenting the Management Representing the -Union/Workman

(S.S. Rahman)

Secretary , RCMS. ,

Chasnalla Branch, M/s. IISCO. LTD. ,

Chasnalla , Dhanbad .

Deputy Manager (PL) , Chasnalla Colliery, Dhanbad .

Dy.Manager(PL)

Chasnalla Colliery

(K.I. Robi) Chasnalla, Dhanbad. Secretary, RCMS, Chasnalla Branch , 1115

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

: Shri B.N. Singh,

For the Workman/Union

Witnessess :

1. (Illegible) (P/No. 9062)

Addl.General Secretary, National Coal Workers, Congress.

: Jharkhand

State

2.. L. Mahato (9882)

: Coal .

Industry

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

Dated, the 28th January , 2004

AWARD

का. आ. 627.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केबीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/259/92- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

By Order No. L-20012 /( 259 )/92 - IR (C-I ) , dated, 28-12-1994 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub -section ( I ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004

"Whether the action of the management of Khas Kusunda Colliery of BCCL in not regularising Shri Arjun Pandey and 69 others (as per list enclosed) on the rolls ofBharat Coking Coal Ltd. , isjustified? Ifnot, towhat relief: the 70 workmen entitled to ? "

2. The case of the concerned workmen according to the written statement submitted by the sponsoring union ontheir behalf, in brief, is as follows:

S.O. 627. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 27/ 95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court- II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-04:

[No. L-20012 /259/92 - IR(C- 1 ) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference Under Section 10( 1 )(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act. , 1947 .

Reference No. 27 of 1995

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Khas Kusunda Colliery ofM/s. B.C.C.Ltd. ,

And

Their workman.

PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

: Shri B.M. Prasad,

It has been submitted by the sponsoring union that the concerned workmen were permanent workmen of Kusunda Colliery till about the end of 1973 and they served inthe said colliery for long prior to its nationalisation and taking over the Government . Upto that period these workmenwere employed in different designations by the management . During that period C.M.P.F. deductions were made from the wages of these workmen so long they were treated as permanent workmen. They alleged that for some reasons best known to the management the concerned workmen were placed on casual rolls from the beginning' of1974 and they were treated as such till about the end of 1976 and thereafter the management stopped their work from the beginning of 1977 bringing the allegation of imposters against them: Due to illegal stoppage of work of the concerned workmen agitation was started and the management in order to save their skin started destroying different registers and records in respect of large number ofworkmen including the concerned workmen with some ulterior motive . On 3-11-1978 out of these 70 workmen 24 workmen submitted representation to the General Manager ofKusunda Area No. 6 through the Manager of Khas Kusunda Colliery which was duly received in the office wherein they mentioned that they were employed in permanent nature of work on permanent rolls of the For the Employers

Advocate .

1116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23; 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] management from 1971 to 1973 and that after 1973 they were treated as casual workmen till the end of 1976 and thereafter they being treated as impersonaters were stopped from work. In the said representation they further mentioned that they submitted all papers in support of their claim to one Lalit Burman for taking necessary action, but taking the plea of missing those papers from his possession he did nothing for their reinstatement . They submitted that another joint application was also submitted on 28-3-78 in connection with resumption of their duties to the General Manager but to no effect. In the year 1983 further joint application was submitted to the General Manager of the Area through proper channel which was duly received in the office, duly signed by 18 workmen witha prayer for their reinstatement in service but that too went in vain. They disclosed that the matter relating to illegal stoppage of work of the concerned workman was also reported to the Ministry of Labour , Government of India,vide letter dated 22-3-1978 and also to the Secretary to the Govt . ofBihar , Labour Department , Patna for taking necessary action but that too yield no result in the matter of reinstatement of the concerned workmen . After 1978, they submitted , their several verbal representations were made by the concerned workmen to the management after receipt of information by them that an enquiry was conducted by the management for ascertaining genuinity for otherwise of the concerned workmen and after enquiry they were found genuine and not imposters but the management cancelled the enquiry report and did not restore their employment . They disclosed that after 1998 when they realised that the management is reluctant to do anything for reinstatement of the concerned workmen in service they raised an industrial dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication. They alleged that the management illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice stopped the concerned workmen from their service and for which they submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate them in service with full back wages.

3. The management, on the contrary, after filing written statement -cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workmen . They submitted that the concerned workman, as per reference , worked on the jobs of shall picking and stone cutting in connection with driving incline or vertical shaft through any contractor. They further disclosed that after a lapse of several years the sponsoring union made a complaint on 31-10-91 to the A.L.C. (C), Dhanbad demanding regularisation of the concerned workmen asserting them to have worked as stone cutters and shale pickers. They submitted that the complaint

before the A.L.C. (C) to the effect that the information about their engagement from 1973-74 and stoppage of work in 1976-77 is based on concocting facts to get the concerned persons employed in the service of the management with the help of litigation. They submitted that the concerned workmen never worked as genuine stone cutters or shale pickers under any contractor and they have assumed some ofthe names of the contractor workers and included many strangers and have filed the present case. As the officers ofthe management working in 1992 were not aware of any fact of the year 1973-94 and no document of that period couldbe available, no specific explanation could be given to the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad and as a result of casual submission made before the A.L.C. ( C) this reference was made to this Tribunal for adjudication on the demand of the concerned workmen for their employment under the management. They submitted that the management is having surplus man power on account of various reasons and circumstances cropping up in course of mining operations in coal mines of this area. They tried to lay off workmen and it was very much resented and the officers weregheraoed and there became law and order problem and for which they are not in a position to retrench the permanent workmen, who are declared surplus to requirement and for which they have to continue all persons even there is no work for them and suffering huge loss and facing legal complications . They submitted that inthe face of such problems , the attempt made by various union to induct large number of workmen in the employment of the management with the help of litigation isbound to lead company to serious consequences . They will be saddled with heavy burden of financial liability by making payment to surplus labour in thousands without providing any job to them . They disclosed that the concerned workmen or the sponsoring union failed to submit any work order of the contractors against which the persons had worked. They also have failed to produce any such papers to show that these workmen worked from 1973-76 as casual workmen and their provident fund contribution were deducted regularly being members of C.M.P.F. They also have failed to produce any identity card in support of their claim that they were engaged as casual workmen by the management during the period in question. Their claims also do not appear in the Form ' B ' Register of the management either on permanent roll or on casual roll . They categorically denied the fact that the .concerned workmen were ever enrolled as permanent workmen or as casual workers . They also have failed to produce employment cards issued by the contractor to its employees . They failed to produce any document to show that they worked as contractor workers under any particular contractor.Accordingly , the management submitted that the claim of the concerned workmen is not tenable in the eyeof law for which they are not entitled to get any relief. Accordingly, their prayer is liable to be rejected.

1117 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

Points for consideration:

that inspite of submitting representation the management 4. "Whether the action of the management ofKhas Kusunda Colliery of BCCL in not regularising Shri Arjun Pandey and 69 others ( as per list enclosed) on the rolls of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. is justified? If not, to what relief are the 70 workmen entitled to ?"

Findingwith reasons:

as 5. It transpires from the record that the manage- ment in order to substantiate their claim have examined two witnesses, MW - 1 and MW-2 while the concerned workman also examined two witnesses , WW-1 and WW- 2 in support of their claim. MW- 1 during his evidence disclosed that he was attached to Khas Kasunda Colliery Asst. Survey or since 1971. He disclosed that there are seems at Khas Kasunda colliery 02 top , two bottom and 3 and in support of that claim this witness produced working plan ofall those seems which have been marked as Exts . M- 1 to M-3 . He further disclosed that the year of work of stone dyke etc. Have been shown in those plans , and according to him, there was no work in connection with any stone work during the period from 1973 to 1977. He disclosed that stone work took place in the year 1979 and in the year 1996. He also disclosed that the nature of the work in connection with stone cutting was never reguilar . MW - 2 during his evidence disclosed that he has been working at Khas Kusunda colliery since before the date of nationalisation and since that period he did not see the concernedworkmen to work under the management as shale pickers . He also disclosed that identity cards are supplied to all workers of the said colliery , and pay slips are also issued to them for payment of their wages . No contractor was ever engaged at Khas Dusunda Colliery for the purpose of shale picking.

did not reinstate the concerned workmen to their work. WW-2, who is one of the concerned workmen, during his evidence disclosed that since prior to 1973 they used to work under the management of Khas Kusunda Colliery as coal cutterand they worked in that capacity till 1976 and thereafter the management stopped their work on the allegation of false impersonation . Considering the facts disclosed in the written statement it transpires that the concerned workmen started working at Khas Kusunda Colliery prior to the date of its nationalisation as coal cutters . Theydisclosed that after nationalisation the present management took them in the roll of casual workers and as casual workers they started working under the management . Prior to nationalisation of the said colliery they used to work as permarient workmen in the said colliery. It is the allegation of the concerned workmen that from earlypart of 1977 the management stopped them from work with the allegation of impersonation . They disclosed that the allegation brought against them by the management was absolutely false . The concerned workmen in support of their claim relied on the document marked Ext. W- 1 . Ext . W - 1 is a notice alleged to have been issued bythe managment by which the concerned workmen have been stopped from work with immediate effect till they are identified as genuine workmen. This notice neither bears any date nor any year of its execution . As such , it cannot be ascertained whether at all this notice was issued by the management . However, on arguments sake if it is taken into consideration that the said notice is genuine one in that case the concerned workmen cannot avoid their responsibilities to establish their claim before this Tribunal in course of hearing. It is the specific contention of the concerned workmen that since prior to nationalisation of Khas Kusunda Colliery they used to work under the management as permanent workers . The management used to deduct provident fund contribution being member of C.M.P.F. It is the cardinal principle oflaw that names ofall workers wherher they are permanent workers or casual workers should be enrolled in Form ' B ' Register . In course ofhearing the concerned workmen have failed to produce any such paper to show that they were enrolled as permanent workers under the management of Khas Kusunda Colliery prior to its nationalisation . The concerned workmen have failed to produce either a single scrap of wage slip or any identity card to show that they were the workers of said colliery. It is unbelievable to consider that a permanent worker who worked for such long years drew wages without any wage slip . It is mandatory for the colliery workers to possess Identity Card for their ingress and egress during the time ofwork.

The concerned workmen did not consider necessary to WW- 1 , who was a Medical Clerk, during his evidence disclosed that he worked at Khas Kusunda from 18-8-79 to 12-5-97 . He disclosed that all the concerned workmen are known to him as they used to visit hospital in connection with their treatment. He further disclosed that inthe month of December , 1976 there was a commotionat Khas Kusunda Colliery and for which the concerned workmen were discharged . This witness also identified the notice issued by the management as Ext. W- 1 by virtue ofwhich the work of the concerned workmen was stopped by the management . He also identified the photo copy of representation submitted by the workmen to the management marked Exts . W- 2 , W-2/ 1 and W-2/2 . The letter dated 26-2-92 issued by the Dy. C.M.E. , Khas Kusunda Colliery addressed to the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad during his evidence was marked Ext. W-3 . He submitted 1118

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] produce any such Identity Card to show that they were workers under the management. It has been submitted by the concerned workmen that the management used to deduct provident fund contribution being member of C.M.P.F. In spite of claiming so they have failed to produce a single scrap of paper to show that any provident fund contribution was deducted and deposited in their account being the members of C.M.P.F. MW- 1 during his evidence disclosed that he worked at Khas Kusunda Colliery as Medical Clerk from 18-8-7 to 12-5-97. Inspite of claiming this fact this witness disclose that all the concerned workmen used to visit hospital in connection with wir treatment etc. It is the contention of the conce workmen that the management stopped their com early part of 1977. If this fact is taken into consideration I have failed to understand how this witness found these persons in the hospital for their treatment particularly when he was not posted their at the relevant time . Not a single scrap ofpaper is forthcomig before the Tribunal in course of hearing that during the period in question the concerned workmen used to visit hospital in connection with their treatment etc. Accordingly , there is sufficient reason to disbelieve the evidence of WW - 1 in this regard . There is reason to believe thathe being interested workmen deposed on behalf of the concerned workmen . WW - 2 during his evidence has failed to produce single scrap of paper to show that upto December , 1976 they worked under the management.

produce any scrap of paper to show that they worked under the management either on permanent roll or on the roll of casual workmen. The concerned workmen relying on the document marked Ext. W- 3 submitted that the management admitted about their work at Khas Kusunda Colliery. From the letter issued by the Dy . C.M.E. , Khas Kusunda Colliery dated 26-2-92 addressed to A.L.C. (C ) ; Dhanbad it has been admitted by the management that the concerned workmen were engaged in stone cutting and for shale picking for sometime. Therefore this info anation does not establish the claim of the concerned ərkmen in any manner that they worked permanently under the management prior to nationalisation of the colliery or they worked continuously till December , 1976 after its nationalisation . The question of application of Sec. 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act comes into question if it has been established that inspite ofrendering services under the management continuously for more than 240 days in a year their works are stopped by the management. This fact the concerned workmen cannot escape to establis as onus absolutely rests on them . I have carefully considered all the material papers on the record. I have failed to find out a single scrap ofpaper to show that the concerned worken worked under the management either on permanent roll or they worked for more than 240 days in a year as casual workers . Until and unless this fact is established there is no scope to draw any conclusion that the stoppage of their work was illegal and for which they are very much entitled to get their reinstatement as casual workmen .

7. In view of all the facts and circumstances discussed above I have no hesitation to say that the concerned workmen through claimed themselves to be the workmen of the management continuously for years together they failed to substantiate their claim to its lightest extent. Mere claim of a person to get relief finds no basis at all until and unless the claim is substantiated by him. Here onus rested on the concerned workmen to establish their claim that they continuously worked under themanagement from 1971 to 1976. I have no hesitation to say that they have failed to establish their claim that they worked for the aforesaid period under the management. either on permanent roll or casual basis and for which. they are not entitled to any relief.

8. In the result , the following award is rendered-

The action of the management of Khas Kusunda Colliery of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. in not regularising Shri Arjun Pandey and 69 others (as per list enclosed) on the rolls of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Is justified and the concerned workmen are not entitled to any relief.

6. It is seen that the concerned workmen were not working under the management in early part of 1977. It is admitted fact that the sponsoring union raised the industrial dispute in the instant case on 31-10-91 . Therefore, it is clear that after a lapse of 14 years the concerned workmen raised an industrial dispute in support of their claim . For such long delay in raising that industrial dispute no cogent explanation is for the coming before this Tribunal in course of hearing on the part of the concerned workmen . However, they took a plea that from time to time they submitted representations to the management for their reinstatement and when the management ultimatley refused to consider their prayer they raised instant industrial dispute. In support of their claim they relied on three copies ofrepresentations marked as Exts . W-2 , W-2/ 1 and W-2/2. These representations neither bear any date nor year to show when they submitted such representations . In representation marked Ext. W- 2/2 however bears an office seal affixed thereon . It transpires that the said representation submitted on 26-11-83 . It is seen that their work was stopped in early part of 1977 and that representation was given after a lapse of more than one and half ycar . It also cannot be asserted from this representation (Ext . W - 2/ 2 ) that it was actually received by the management . Apart from the copies of these representations the concerned workmen have failed to

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer 1119

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

2. The case of the concerned, workman according to written statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is as follows:-

का.आ. 628.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 254/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/489/98- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004

The sponsoring ,Union submitted that the concerned workman was a permanent wagon loader of South Govindpur colliery of Govindpur area under the management . They submitted that due to constant working at railway siding of the colliery the concerned workman fell ill and went to his native village for his treatment , on 27-5-95 and remained on treatment till 4-11-95 and reported for duty on 5-11-95 but instead of allowing him to join his dutymanagement issued a chargesheet to him dt . 7-11-95 and with ulterior motive without issuing any order of suspension debarred him to work till he was dismissed vide order dt. 25-7-97.

S.O. 628. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 254/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-2004 .

[No. L- 20012/489/ 98 - IR (C - 1 ) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT:

They alleged that neither any chargesheet was handed over to the concerned workman nor any oppertunity was given to him for its reply . He was also not aware of any departmental proceedings against him . Accordingly, he was not given any opportunity to depend his case . Even prior to passing of this order of dismissal management did not give any opportunity to defend his case. They alleged that action taken by the management to dismissed him from service w.e.f 29-7-97 was not only illegal and unjustified but also against the principle of natural justice and for which he raised an Industrial Dispute which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . Accordingly sponsoring Union submitted prayer on behalf of the concerned workman to reinstate him in service with full back wages .

SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industria Dispute under Section 10(1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947

REFERENCE NO . 254 OF 1999

PARTIES:

Enıployers in relation to the Management of M/s . BCCL and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

On behalf of the workman : None

On behalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate State : Jharkhand Industry: Coal

Dhanbad, Dated, the 28th January , 2004. AWARD

3. Management on the contrary after filing written statement - cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman. They submitted that the concerned workman was a wagon loader at South Govindpur colliery and he developed the habit of absentirg, himself from his duties without information or permission and without sufficient cause. They submitted that in the year 1993 the concerned workman put 169 days of attendance while in the year 1994 and 1995 he put attendance for 96 days and 35 days respectively . They alleged that the concemed workman started remaining himself absent for more than 10 days without giving any intimation or prior permission of the management with effect from 27-5-95 as the said act constituted misconduct they issued a chargesheet to him to which he sumitted his reply . They submitted that as the reply given by the concerned workman was not satisfactory decided to hold domestic enquiry against him and appointed Mr. J. K. Sinha, Dy. Personnel Manager as Enquiry Officer to conduct domestic enquiry against him.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/489 /98 - IR (C - I ) , dated, the 4th June, 1999 ,

SCHEDULE

They submitted that after taking charge of the domestic enquiry the Enquiry Officer not only issued several notices but also published the news of holding enquiry proceeding in the local news paper having its wide cirulation. They alleged that inspite of issuance of repeated notices and also inspite of pbulication of the " Kya B.C.C.L. Key pravandhtantra dwara 22-2-97 sey Shri Kallu Bhuia Loader ki sevaya samapt kiya jana vidhibat evam nayaochit hai ? Yadi nahi to karmkar kis rahat key patra hai ? "

689G1/2004-13 1120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] news relating to domestic enquiry as the concerned workman failed to turn up the Enquiry Officer conducted the domestic enquiry exparte against him and after completing that enquiry he submitted his report holding him guilty to the chages . Disciplinary authority after perusing enquiry report and all relevant papers relatingto enquiry proceedings and other material papers dismissed the concerned workman from service.

They submitted that such order of dismissal was legal valid and they did not commit any wrong violating the principle of natural justice in passing the said order. Accordingly the management submitted that the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief in view ofhis prayer

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

standing order applicable to the workmen they issued a chagesheet to the concerned workman dt . 7-11-95 to explain the reason of his such long unauthorised absence . They further disclosed that the concerned workman gave his reply to the chargesheet but as reply given by him was far from satisfactory they decided to held domestic enquiry against him and appointed enquiry officer to that effect . It is their specific contention that inspite of issuance of repeated notices and also publication of the news of domestic enquiry in the local daily having its wide circulation as the concerned workman failed to appear the said enquiry officer conducted domestic enquiry exparte and submitted his report holding him guilty to the charges and thereafter the Disciplinary authority considering the report of the enquiry officer as well as other material papers dismissed him from service with effect from 25-7-97.

"Kya B.C.C.L. Key pravandhtantra dwara 22-7-97 sey Shri Kallu Bhuia Loader ki sevaya samapt kiya jana vidhibat evam nayaochit hai ? Yadi nahi to karmkar kis rahat key patra hai ? "

5. FINDINGS WITH REASONS

It transpires from the record that the concerned workman neither appeared excepting filling written statement at the very initial stage nor adduced any evidence to substantiate his claim . Accordingly management declined to aduce any evidence on their part as initial onus was on the concerned workman to establish his claim. No relevant paper is also forthcoming before this Tribunal on either of the side to consider the claim of the concerned workman excepting their respective plending.

Considering the contention of the management it is clear that for committing misconduct on the , ground of unauthorised absence for a long period they issued chagesheet to the concerned workman . Concerned workman in his pleading also admitted the fact of issuance of chargesheet to him by the management . However , he disclosed owing to his illness he remained absent with effect from 27-5-95 and went to his native village for his treatinent . It has also been admitted by him that on the said ground he remained himself absent till 4-11-95 Therefore , onus is on him to establish the fact that he was actually lying ill for the period in question . Concerned workman had sufficient scope to place material medical papers in support of his claim but he did not consider necessary to do so . No incriminating material is also forthcoming to show that he after giving due intimation to the management left the place of work for his treatment . It has been submitted by the concerned workman that the management did not allow to resume his duty on 5-11-95 when he came to his place of work tojoin. His allegation is that till the order of dismissal he was debarred by the management to work . The allegation which has been brought is no doubt serious but inspite of being such allegation he did not , inspite of getting ample opportunity consider necessary to establish the same .

Considering the pleadings of both sides there is na dispate to hold that the concerned workman was a wagon loader at Govindpur Colliery under Govindpur Arca. It is alse admitted fact that the concerned workman started retai ning himself absent from duty with effect from 27-8-95 . The claim of the concerned workman is that due to constant work at Rty , siding of the colliery he fell ill and for which he went to his native village in connection with his treatment and remained absent till 4-11-95 . He disclosed that on 5-11-95 he returned back and reported to the place of work with a view to resume his duty but instead of allowing him to join management issued chagesheet to hi : dt. 9-11-95. He further alleged that without allowing hiza to join his duty and also without suspending him front work management illegally and arbitrarily debarred him from work till he was dismissed by order dt . 25-7-97 .

In para 4 of the written statement the concerned workman admitted the fact of issuance of chargesheet to him by the management . No satisfactory explanation is forthcoming why he did not consider necessary to attend enquiry proceedings with a view to substantiate his claim particularly when the management decided to hold domestic enquiry being dissatisfied with the reply to the chargesheet given by him .

6. The allegation of the ntanagement on the contrary is that the concerned workman developed the habit of remaining himself absent from duty and during the year 1993, 1994 and 1995 he put his attendance for 169 days , 96 days and 35 days respectively. They further disclosed that with effect from 27.5-95 the concerned workman went on unauthorised feave without assigning any reason or without gis ing any intimation to them . They submitted that as the absence for more than 1t) days without permission amounts to misconduct as per certified

Accordingly , considering the facts and circumstances , there is no scope to say that management committed any illegality in holding domestic enquiry against, the concerned workman on the allegation of committing misconduct . It is admitted lact that relying on domestic enquiry management dismissed him from service . It is the claim of the concerned workman that management illegally dismissed him from sevice . The record speaks 1121

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the Management of Tisco . Jamadoba and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : None

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated , Dhanbad, the 29th January , 2004

AWARD

clearly that the concerned workman from 27-5-95 till the date of dismissal i.e. for more than two years remained himself absent from duty . Such long absence from duty without assigning cogent ground cannot be considered as minor offence to ignore . It is the concerned workman on whom the burden shifts that actually he was lying seriously ill and for which he could not attend to his duty. It is seen that ample opportunity was given to the concerned workman to substantiate his claim but lamentably he has failed to do so . Therefore , in view ofthe facts and circumstances discussed above I find no cogent ground to say that management illegally , arbitrarily and violating the principles of natural justice dismissed him from service and for which he is not entitled to get any relief.

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) (d) of the I. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012 / 151 /2001 -IR (C -I ) , dated, the 10th July 2001 .

In the result, the following Award is rendered:---

SCHEDULE

"The action of the management of M/s . BCCL in terminating the services of Shri Kalu Bhuia, loader is legal and justified . Consequently , the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . TISCO. Ltd. Jamadoba in not regularising Md. Islam, Temporary workman is justified ? If not, to what relief is Md . Islam entitled and from what date ?" B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

2. The case of the concerned workman according to the written statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is as follows:-

का.आ. 629.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरणं में , केन्द्रीय सरकार टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 194/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/151/2001 - आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी

The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was appointed by the management on 21-1-92 on the service strength of his father Abdul Aziz as per enrolment of his name in the dependant's register Before his appointment the management imparted training under the Mines Rules and he was medically examined for ascertaining his fitness for the job in the underground and assured him to make permanent in his job as soon as he will complete 190 days attendance in the under- ground.

New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004

S.O. 629. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 194/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the the employers in relation to the management of TISCO and their workman, received by the Central Government on 13-2-2004 .

[No. L-200 12/ 151 /2001 - IR (C- 1 ) ] N. P. KESHAVAN , DeskOfficer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2)

DHANBAD

PRESENT:

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act . , 1947

They submitted that according to the need of the management against permanent vacanies the concerned workman was deployed at Jamadoba collieries as a plece rated miner for cutting and loading coal and during 1992, 1993 , 1994 , 1995 , 1996 and 1997 he worked under the management as miner in the underground for 99 days, .171 days , 259 days , 210 days , 196 days and 176 days . Thereafter from 1998 they allowed him duties only for 130 days to 150 days in a year so that he cannot complete 190 days attendance in the underground in a year . They submitted that as the concerned workman completed more than 190 days attendance in the year 1994 he demanded for his regularisation as minor . They disclosed that as the concerned workman completed 190 days attendance in the underground he has fulfilled the criteria required to be regularised in the post of a minor and accordingly , thereafter any break in his service made by the management without following the procedure of law may be held illegal and unjustified. They alleged that inspite of giving repeated representation as the management neglected and refused to regularise the concerned workman as miner he raised an industrial dispute before the ALC (C) , Dhanbad REFERENCE NO . 194 OF 2001 1122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] for consideration which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal by the Ministry for adjudication . The sponstring Union accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to regularise the concerned workman as minor since 1994 along with all consequential benefits .

hold that the concerned workman got his employment as temporary miner on the service strength of his father with effect from 11-11-92. It is the claim of the concerned workman that inspite of his discharging duties as miner in the underground for more than 190 days in each year from 1994 the management did not consider necessary to regularise him as miner.

On the contrary it is the contention of the management that the concerned workman got his appointment as temporary worker of the dependents of the employees working under them as per register maintained therefor . They further submitted that they maintain a list of seniority of these workman who have got temporary appointment under the dependent's quota and according to the seniority list their services are regularised based on availability of permanent vacancy . They disclosed that as per the said seniority list the name of the concerned workman is appearing in Sl. No. 675 i.e. he is junior to 674 workmen and for which question of his regularisation superseding his services in any manner could notbe taken into consideration .

Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and also considering evidence of MW-1 it is clear that management maintains a scheme for consideration of the employment of the dependents of the employees whose names have been enrolled in the employees dependent register. It is clear considering all facts and circumstances that the concerned workman got his temporary employment as underground miner against leave and sick vacancies but his regularisation could not be consider by the management on two grounds viz as per panel of temporary workers his position is 675 and for which superseding his seniors numbering about 674 it was not possible on the part of the management to regularise him as miner and secondly regularisation of such worker dependended on the availability of permanent vacancy.

3. Management on the contrary after filing written statement- cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement on behalf of the concerned workman . They submitted that they maintain employees dependent register in respect of the collieries and establishments to facilitate the workman to get their dependents enrolled after completion of 15 years of service for their employment against future vacancies . They disclosed that as they maintain employees dependents register it does not confer any right to the workman to get employment of their dependents taking the plea that their names have been enrolled therein . They provide employment to such dependents in the event of existence of temporary vacancies for temporary duration according to requirement . Absorption of the dependents in permanent vacancies who are working on temporary vacancies are taken up for consideration on the basis of selections according to seniority , suitability after necessary medical examinations. They disclosed that such temporary employment is given as a privilege and for which it does not confer any right to demand for permanent employment. They submitted that for introduction of modern technology to augment production of coal in the mines necessity for deploying higher man power has been reduced considerably and for which they are facing surplus man power and to cope with such problem they have already introduced several voluntary retirerment scheme amongst the permanent colliery workers . They submitted that the concerned workman was provided temporary employment in the capacity of dependant son of Abdul Aziz who was in the employment as and when required basis against temporary requirement or additional requirement in course of various mining operations carried on in the mines and for which he did not accrue any right to place his demand for permanent absorption .

Accordingly management submitted to pass award rejecting the claim of the sponsoring union to regularise the concerned workman asminer .

3. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s. TISCO. Ltd. Jamadoba in not regularising Md . Islam, Temporary workman is justified ? If not to what relief is Md. Islam entitled and from what date ?"

It transpires from the record that though management in order to substantiate their claim examine one witness as MW - 1 the concerned workman did not consider necessary to adduce any evidence on his part in support of his claim .

4. Considering the evidence of MW - 1 and also considering pleadings of both sides I find no dispute to

Ithas not been established by the concerned workman in course ofhearing that he worked as miner for more than 190 days in a year . However, management also did not deny this fact . However , it is the specific claim of the management that regularisation of any worker depends on availability of permanent vacancy subject to the conditions that the concerned workman as per panel of temporary workers stands on that point which invites to get his regularisation without jeopardising the interest of other senior temporary workers . It is fact that instead of facing open competition the concerned workman has got his temporary employment as per the scheme launched by the management . Therefore it is expected that the concerned workman should abide by the service condition of the temporary workers . As per the Panel position the name of the concerned workman appears in Sl . No. 675 . Therefore , is the demand of the concerned workman is considered in that case his regularisation is to be made superseding all his seniors and if it is so done it will invite serious unrest in the mines which obviously will create a 1123

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/ फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the Management of TISCO . Ltd. and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf ofthe workman : Mr. Samarendra Sinha,

Advocate .

Onbehalfof the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate .

serious impact not only in smooth running of the mines but also operation of that scheme also will come to a vulnerable position. Apart from all these facts it should be borne into mind that question of fegularisation depends on availability of permanent vacancy . No evidence is forthcoming on the part of the concerned workman that he is senior most temporary miner as per panel prepared by the management and there exists clear permanent vacancy where he could be regularised.

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated, Dhanbad, the 29th January , 2004 AWARD

As such after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances I find sufficient ground to hold that claim of the concerned workman does not stand on substantial footing and for which he is not entitled to get relief in view of his prayer.

In the result, the following Award is rendered:-

"The action of the management of M/s . TISCO.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the 1. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/355 /2000 - IR (C -I ) , dated, the 29th November , 2000.

SCHEDULE

Ltd. Jamadoba in not regularising Md. Islam Temporary workman is justified . Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी, 2004

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . TISCO. Ltd. Jamadoba of not regularising of Sri Shailendra Singh, Temporary worker is justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is Sri Shailendra Singh entitled and from what date ? "

2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf in brief is as follows :-

का.आ. 630.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 180/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/ 355 /2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th February, 2004

S.O. 630. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 180/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of TISCO and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-2004.

[No. L-20012/355/2000 - IR (C- I)]

N. P. KESHAVAN , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT, DHANBAD

PRESENT:

The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was appointed by the management of TISCO . Ltd. Jamadoba on 10-8-92 as temporary worker on the service strength of his father Sri Ramnaresh Singh , a teacher of Jamadoba Primary School of the management . They submitted that at the time of giving employment to the concemed workman the management assured him that he will be made permanent in his post as soon as he will complete 190 days of attendance in the underground accordingly management deployed him in the job of miner in the underground for cutting and loading coal . They submitted that during the next following years the concerned workman worked as minor for more than 1900 days in a year and for which he requested the management to regularise him in his job of minor as a pre - condition of his service but inspite of making repeated request they did not consider his prayer . They alleged that as the management did not consider the legitimate claim of the concemed workman finding no other way he raised an industrial dispute before the ALC ( C ) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal by the Ministry for adjudication . The sponsoring Union accordingly , submitted prayer to pass award with a direction to the management to regularise the concerned workman as miner since 1995 with consquential benefits .

Shri Biswas , Presiding Officer

2. Management on the contrary after filing Written statement- cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegation which the sponsoring Union asserted in the In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 REFERENCE NO . 180 OF 2000 1124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] written statement on behalf of the concerned workman.

They admitting the claim of the sponsoring Union relating to temporary appointment of the concerned workmant as miner submitted that such temporary appointment are given to the dependents of workers against temporary vacancies created during leave and sick vacancies of permanent workers as per commitment made to the recognised union i.c. R. C. M. S. They disclosed that they try to provide maximum number of days of work to such workınan in a year according to availability of temporary vacancies so that he can have decent earning during different periods . They submitted that it was not practicable on their part to provide regular employment against any permanent post due to want of vacancy . They disclosed that the concerned workman was at a very low stage in the seniority list of temporary workers as per the norms of computation of seniority for the temporary workers and for which it is not at all feasible to uphold his claim ignoring the claim of other temporary workers who are quite seniors to him as per panel .

Accordingly , they submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman .

POINTS TO BE DECIDED 3.

"Whether the action of the management of M / s . TISCO . Ltd. Jantadoba of not regularising of Shri Shailendra Singh , Temporary worker is justified ? If not to what relief is Sri Shailendra Singh entitled and from what date ?"

4. FINDINGS WITH REASONS

It transpires from the record that the concerned workman in order to substantiate his claim examined himself as witness while management also examined one witness as MW - 1 in support of their claim.

register as per seniority of the workers for giving temporary employment when any temporary vacancy arises. From that list offer is given to the dependents for temporary employment who are found available . He submitted that temporary panel at present consisting the names of 1057 temporary workers and the said panel has been devided into two parts . Each pool is effective for six months alternatively with a view to provide temporary employment to all workers of the pool subject to availability of temporary requirements . This witness disclosed that name of the concerned workman is appearing in Sl . No. 931 as per list Ext. M. 1. Management also in support of their claim produced the employment slip Ext . M.2 and wage slips Ext . M.3 series . Considering the employment slip it transpires that the concerned workman got his temporary employment on 10-8-92. No where from this employment slip it can be found that assurance was given to the concerned workman for his regularisation as miner on giving his attendance for 190 days in a year , Concerned workman during his evidence in support of his claim has failed to produce a single scrap of paper to show that assurance was given to him for his regularisation on completion of 190 days work in the underground as a miner in a year at the time of issuance of appointment letter to him. It has not been denied by the management about giving employment to the concerned workman from the pool against leave and sick vacancy but the does not confer any right to place the claimi for regularisation. During hearing Ld. Advocate for the management submitted that as per policy decision absorption of the temporary workers who have been provided employment as per list in the permanent category are taken up for consideration on the basis of selection according to seniority , suitability after necessary medical examination and for which as the concerned workman as of right cannot place his claim for regularisation taking the plea that he attended duty in the underground for more than 190 days in a year Ld . Advocate for the workman on the contrary referring decisions reported in 2003( 97) FLR 566 , 2003 ( 97 ) FLR 506 2002 ( 94 ) FLR 1183 submitted that claim of the concerned workman for his regularisation as miner stands on cogent footing. Ld . Advocate for the management submitted that the decision which the Ld . Advocate for the workman relied on are not applicable in the instant case as because the management neither retrenched nor discharged the concerned workman from his teniporary employment . On the contrary management still provide him temporary employment as and when leave and sick vacancy arises .

5. No evidence on the part of the concerned worknian is forthcoming to show that he has been dismissed or retrenched by the management inspite of his rendering service for more than 190 days in the underground as miner each year since the period of his employment.

Considering the evidence of both sides and also considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of the respective parties I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workman got his appointinent on temporary basis as miner at Jamadoba on 10-8-92 , on the basis of dependent's quota in view of the service strength of his father Ram Naresh Singh who was a teacher at Jamadoba Primary School of the management . It is the contention of the concerned workman that at the time of his appointment management assured to regularise him in his post on completion of 190 days attendance in the underground. He disclosed that during the following years he worked under the management for more than 190 days in each year but management did not consider necessary to regularise him as miner. He submitted that for his regulation he submitted representation to the management but to no effect . On the contrary from the submission of the management a different picture comes in relation to the claim of the concerned workman. MW - 1 during his evidence disclosed that initially the names of employees dependents are recorded in the employees dependent register who have completed atleast 15 years of permanent service . Thereafter a list is prepared from the dependents

6. There is no dispute to hold that the concerned workman got his employment as per enrolment of his name in the register of employees dependent . The concerned [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1125

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

workman during his cross - examination admitted that he was appointed as temporary miner /loader and management provides himjob whenever any leave vacancy arises . He also admitted that there are other temporary miners/loaders who work under the management also are provided with job when their turn comes as temporary workman . This very admission of the concerned workman shows clearly that management not only provide him temporary employment but also provide temporary employment to other workman like him whenever leave and sick vacancy arises.

As per the Panel position name of the concerned workman is appearing in Sl . No. 931 (Ext . M. 1 ) . Therefore if the demand of the concerned workman is considered in that case management will have to regularise him superseding 930 temporary workers who are senior to him and if it is done it will definitely invite serious industrial unrest in the arena of the management which ultimately will make the scheme itself at stake , though it was introduced for better benefit of the employees.

Apart from all these facts and circumstances it should be borne into mind that question of regularisation of a temporary workman depends on availability ofpermanent vacancy. Obviously in absence of any such permanent vacancy there is no scope to regularise the workınan in permanent vacancy . No evidence is forthcoming on the part of the concerned workman that he is the senior most miner as per panel of temporary workers and there exists clear permanent vacancy where he could be regularised but management illegally and arbitrarily refused him to regularisehinı.

6. The concerned workman was neither retrenched nor discharged from his employment . On the contrary his evidence speaks clearly that still management provide him temporary cimployment alongwith other temporary workers whenever any leave vacancy occurs . Therefore, in the instant case there is no scope to consider that management have retrenched or discharged the concerned workman from employment . If that is not the position question of application of Scc . 25F of the 1.D. Act does not arise . Ld. Advocate for the concerned workman in course of hearing has failed to show any provision of N.C.W.A. that the concerned workman by virtue of his rendering service to the management for more than 190 days in a year in the underground acernes his right to claim regularisation superseding his seniors who are also waiting for their regularisation.

Accordingly , in view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that the concerned workman has failed to substantiate his claim and for which he is not entitled to get any relief in view of his prayer .

In the result, the following Award is rendered: -- "The action of the management of M/s . Tisco. Ltd. Jamadoba of not regularisation Sri Shailendra Singh . Temporary worker is justified .

Consequently , the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 631.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों . के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-20012/56/95 - आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एन० पी० केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 13th February, 2004 S.O. 631. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-2-2004 ..

[No. L -20012/56/95 -IR (C- 1 ) ] N. P. KESHAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

SHRIB . BISWAS , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 REFERENCE NO . 16 OF 1996

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the Management of Block II Area of M/ s . B.C.C.L and their workman . APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman :

On behalf of the management :

Mr. B. N. Singh, Representative. Mr. H. Nath, Advocate .

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal. Dhanbad , the 30th January , 2004 AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 100 (1) (d) ofthe I. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/( 56 )/95-I.R. ( Coal -I), dated, the 29th February , 1996

SCHEDULE

"Whether the Union is justified in demanding for the placentent of Shri Govind Pandey Miner/Loader 1126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] in Clerical Grade - II on the basis of the qualifications and performance of the duties in similar capacity ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to ?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is us follows:-

only amounted to show gross discremination but also it will be unconstitutional . They submitted that in order to avoid discrimination in the matter of selection of candidates into clerical cadre at the choice of the controlling officer the cadre scheme has been framed by the JBCCI and the management is bound to follow the same without any discrimination and without any favouritism shown to any workman. It has been disclosed by him that as the concerned workman was an educated person who was employed as Miner/loader on his request local management gave his posting at Regional stores w.e.f. 13-5-91 and was entrusted to perform thejob of collecting different materials rom different agencies . In some cases considering his qualification he was entrusted with typing work or so absolutely on stop gap manner but he was never allowed to perform clerical job like that of clerk continuously . Disclosing all these facts management submitted that claim ofthe concerned workman for his regularisation in clerical Gr. II is baseless and knowing fully of the same he has placed such claim which cannot be considered in any way .

Accordingly, they submitted their prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the workman.

POINTS TO BE DECIDED

Sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman "hough signated as Miner/ Loader has been deployed by the huent in the Regional Stores of Block II area a suc3-501 by virtue of his possessing degree in Barelor ofArts and expioni to perform different dures of Asstt. Store Keeper as well as different duties of there keeper. They referring letter No. R. S./B-11/693/92-93 dt. 1-3-93 issued by the management submitted a management also expressed their satisfaction in the matter of performing duties assigned to him in the stores . By the same letter management also recommended for his placement in higher grade in reward to his satisfactory performance of duties as clerk in the Regional Stores of Block II Area . They alleged that in spite of all these facts management did not consider necessary to regularise him in Grade II as Assistant Store Keeper. They further alleged that management also did not pay any importance to the representation submitted by the concerned workman for his regularisation as Assistant Store Keeper Gr. II and for which he raised an industrial dispute before ALC( C) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal.

4. "Whether the Union isjustified in demanding for the placement of Shri Govind Pandey Miner / Loader in clerical Gr. II on the basis of the qualifications and performance of the duties in similar capacity ? If so , to what releif is the concerned workman entitled to ? "

FINDINGS WITH REASONS

5. It transpires from the record that the concerned workman in spite of getting sufficient opportunities did neither consider necessary to adduce any evidence with a view to substantiate his claim nor he gave any further instruction to his representative to move further Mr. B. N. Singh who was representative of the concerned workman and who time to time appeared on his behalf in course of hearing ofthis case on 20-1-04 expressed his inability to proceed with further hearing of this case as the concerned workman did not give him any further instruction in that regard. Obviously, Ld . Advocate for the management declined to adduce any evidence on their part .

Inview of this situation let it be considered if the claim of the concerned workman stands on any cogent footing for getting his relief in view of his prayer . Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and also considering his appointment letter there is nodispute to hold that the concerned workman was initially appointed as Miner/Loader by the management .

3. Management on the contrary after filing written statement- cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims of allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in his Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman. They submitted that the concerned workman was appointed as Minor/Loader on piece rated basis. They submitted that demand of the sponsoring Union for placement of a minor/loader in clerical Gr. II is absurd apart from being unreasonable . They disclosed that as per provision of cadre scheme for ministerial staff circulated though Implementation Instruction No. 34 dt . 17-7-84 any workman belonging to different cadre may be inducted in clerical grade III provided he possess minimum qualification of Matriculation or equivalent certificate issued by any Board of Examination recognised by the Govt. He should also have worked for atleast three years in the company. He will be appointed in Clerk Gr. III if he passed the selection test to be conducted by a selection committee duly constituted by the Competent Authority. It has been further submitted that for a person to be placed in clerical grade II he should have atleast three years of minimum experience as clerk Gr. III and should be cleared by DPC for his placement in Clerk Gr . II . Accordingly, it is the contention of the management that if the concerned workman is placed in clerical Gr. II he will supersede all the workmen who are already in clerk Gr. III which will not

It is the specific claim of the concerned workman thatbeing deployed by the management since 13-5-91 he is discharging his duties at Regional Stores of Block II Area as Asstt. Store Keeper by virtue of his possessing degree in Bachelor of Arts . He further submitted that time 1127 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

to time local managem ent appreciated his work as Asstt. Store Keeper and recommended to higher authority for his regularisation as A sstt. Store Keeper in clerical Gr. II. He alleged that in spite ofrendering his duties as Assistant Store Keeper for years together and also in spite of recommendation made by the authority management refused to regularise him as Assistant Store Keeper in clerical Gr. II .

On the contrary management admitting the fact of his posting at Regional Stores with effect from 13-5-91 disclosed that he was ; never posted there to discharge his duties as Assistant Store Keeper . They submitted that the concerned workmarı was a graduate and he made a request to place him in any work on the surface instead ofhis work in the underground as miner /loader and in view of that < request and also considering his qualification local management der loyed him to perform some clericaljobs during certain period of time showing favour to him and taking advantage of that favour he cannot place demand for his regulari sation as Assistant Store Keeper in clerical Gr. II.

They submitted that job nomenclature of Cat . I miner/loader and that of clerical grade are quite different and there is 'no scope at all for a miner/leader to claim his regularisation in clerical Gr. II which is a cadre post . They submitted that as per provision of Cadre scheme for ministerial staff circulated through Implementation Instruction No. 34 dt . 17-7-84 any workman belonging to different category may be inducted in clerical grade III provided he possesses minimum qualification of Matriculation or equivalent examination having at least three years of experience and subject to his selection by the Selection Committee constituted by the comperent authority . They submitted that there is no short cut policy ofgetting regularisation of a miner/ loader of Cat. I directly toGrade . II clerical cadre : Management further submitted that for: promotion in clerical Gr . II a workman should possess: atleast three years minimum experience in clerical Gr. III and his name must be recommended by D.P.C. Referring Implementation Instruction No. 34dt. 17-7-84 management submitted that if the claim of the concerned workman is considered in that case not only the workman who are in clerical Gr. III will be deprived to get their promotion in clerical Gr . II but also there will be a serious discrimination which mist be considered as unethical and unconstitutional.

workman started working at Regional Stores as miner/ loader instead of his working in the underground. In course of hearing the concerned workman has failed to show any order issued by the competent authority to get his posting at Regional Stores though it transpires from different office orders that he was allowed to work in the Regional Stores . It transpires from the record that Depot officer K. C. Sahay vide letter dt. 1-3-93 disclosed that the concerned workman has been working as a clerk at different section of Regional stores since 13-5-91 . It is not clear how it was possible for a miner /loader to work as clerk without following the specific guide line given in Implementation Instruction No. 34 and without getting his appointment/promotion in clerical Grade III . It is the specific claim of the concerned workman for his regularisation in clerical Gr. II since 13-5-91 . There is no dispute to hold that the post of clerk Gr. II is a cadre post. Implementation Instruction No. 34 has specifically pointed out how a workman is eligible to get his promotion/ regularisation in clerical Gr . II . According to that Instruction No. 34 question of getting elevation in Clerical Gr. IIwill com if a workman completes his three years service continuously in clerical Gr . III subject to recommendation byD.P.C. Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings ofboth sides and also considering materials on record it is evident that the concerned workman in the year 1989 got his appointment as miner/loader. Not a single scrap of paper is forthcoming to show that concerned workman got hispromotion/regularisation as clerical Gr. III by the management as per Implementation Instruction No. 34. Even no paper is forthcoming to show that superseding the provision of Implementation Instruction No. 34 management regularised the concerned workman in clerical Gr. III from miner/loader. Until and unless a workman is regularised in clerical Gr. III there is no scope to get his regularisation in Clerical Gr . II . In absence of any order from the competent authority there is reason to believe that local management for the reason best known to them allowed the concerned workman to work in the Regional Stores instead of getting his service as miner/loader for which he got his appointment without obtaining specific order from the competent authority . As there is no specific order to that effect such engagement of the concerned workman to take up clerical job has no legal status . Accordingly, there sufficient reason to hold that the status of the concerned workman was of his status of miner/ loader. In the circumstances , onus absolutely rests on the concerned workman to establish that claim for his regularisation in clerical Gr . II directly from the post of miner/loader is legal andjustified . Concerned workman inspite of getting ample opportunities have failed to substantiate his claim by adducing cogent evidence either oral or documentray.

Claim as made in the written statement submitted by the concerned workman cannot be considered as substantive piece of evidence until and unless such claim is substantiated by cogent evidence . In view of my 6. Implemeritation Instruction No. 34 clearly has pointed out how promotion or regularisation in Clerical Grade- III and II will be considered. It is admitted that the concerned workman got his appointment as miner/loader onplece rated basis. The appointment letter shows that he got his temporary appointment as miner/leader on 13/ 14-2-89. There is no dispute to held that the concerned workman is a qualified person. It is seen that ignoring his qualification he accepted his appointment as miner/loader. Withutter surprise it is seen that w.e.f. 15-3-91 the concemed

689G1/2004-14 1128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23, 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

AWARD

discussion above I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workman has lamentably failed to establish his claim and for which he is not entitled to get any relief.

The 6th day of February, 2004.

In the result, the following Award is rendered :

"The Union is not justified in demanding for the placement of Shri Govind Pandey Miner/Loader in Clerical Gr. II on the basis of the qualifications and performance of the duties in similar capacity . Consequently the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

By the adjudication order No. L - 12011 / 104/ 2001 [ IR(B - II) ] dated 24-08-2001 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi has referred, under Clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2K) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as ' the Act ' ) , the following dispute between the management of Bank of India, Zonal Office, Bihar North Zone, Chankaya Palace, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna and their workman Sri Rajiv Kumar Singh for adjudication to thisTribunal:-

नई दिल्ली, 16 फरवरी, 2004

"Whether Shri Rajeev Kumar Singh had worked as dailyratedworker with Bank of India, Chapra Branch from 2-8-1986 to 29-7-2002 ? If so, whether the action of the management in terminating the services of Shri Singh on 31-07-2000 wasjustified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?. "

का.आ. 632.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16(C )/ 2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 12011/104/2001- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव.

New Delhi , the 16th February, 2004

S.O. 632. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 16 (C)/ 2001 of the Industrial Tribunal , Patna ( Bihar) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the manage neat of Bank of India and their workmen , received by we Central Government on 13-2-2004.

[No. L- 12011/104/2001 - IR (B - 11) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL PATNA

4 Reference No. 16 C of 2001

2. Both the parties namely the worker Rajiv Kumar Singh and the management of Bank of India (hereinafter to be referred as the " worker " and the " management" respectively ) , have filed their written statement and contested the case . The worker's claim, in short, is that he was orally appointed by the management of Bank of India, ChapraBranch on and from 2-8-96 to discharge the duties ofapeon, and he, accordingly, as per requirement performed his duties as a peon as instructed by the Manager. He attended the Branch to perform various joibs of a peon from 9.30 A.M. to 6.30 P.M. He was initially paid wages@Rs. 45 /- per day , which was later on increased by Rs . 5/-. His wages were paid through debit vouchers . On 29-7-2000 at 3 P.M. , the worker was informed of his termination . When he went to the Branch as usual on the following working day'i.e. 31-7-2000 , he was stopped from working on aforesaid ground. He claims to have worked continuously from 2-8-96 to 29-7-2000 and also for over 240days in 12 calender months preceding his termination . The workman has challaeged his termination on the ground ofalleged violation of provisions u/s . 25F of the Indfustrial Disputes Act and also unfair labour practice adopted by the management by keeping him on tenterhook for about four years. The worker has accordingly prayed for his reinstateinent and regularisation of his services besides back wages and other allied reliefs.

Management of Bank of India, Zonal Office , R. Bl: ck. Bihar North Zone, Chanakya Palace , Veer Chand Patel Marg Road. Patna and their workman represented by the General Secretary, Bank of India , Employees Federation, Bihar. C/o . BOI, Patna , service Branch Uday Bhawan, Frazer Road. Patna ( Bihar) .

For theManagement Sri P.K. Tripathy , Industrial Relations Officer.

For the Workman

Sri B. Prasad, General Secretary, Bank of India Employees Federaton, Patna .

Present

: Priya Saran, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

3. The management in their written statement has categorically refuted various claims and the dispute raised by the worker, precisely stating that the union sponsoring the dispute has no representative capacity in the branch and so, the present one can not be deemed to be an 'Industial Dispute ' and accordingly, the reference is bad. in law. The management have further denied that the worker wasorally appointed by them on 2-8-96 to discharge the duties of a peon . The worker was engaged for a few days during the period by the Manager of Chapra Branch to do odd jobs on daily wages as and when required from 2-1-99 1129

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23 , 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

W/122 is dated 22-7-2000. The relevancy of these documents shall be taken into account later at appropriate place.

to 20-11-99 . He was engaged only casually , and intermittently as and when manual labour was required for cleaning ofpremises , bundling of old records etc. The worker was paid by the Branch Manager , which was reimbursed by the Bank to the latter. On the back ofrelevant vouchers , both the Manager and worker have signed. It is further stated by the management that the worker is a manipulator and has forged some vouchers by putting his signature on back which were relating to other persons , and also the transfer voucher relating to washing allowance to the Arms Guard Umesh Singh . It has been also stated that the worker never worked for 240 days in any calender year much less 12 calendar months preceding the date ofpurported termination. The written statement further states that Sec . 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act has got no application in the present case as the worker was neither appointed in Bank service nor he was in continuous employment for one year within the meaning of Sec . 25B of the Act. The worker was never a workman as required under the Act, and he was in fact occasionally engaged on the basis of needed work.

4. In view pleadings of the parties and also the reference , the basic and the moot question which arises for decision is , whether the worker worked in the Bank for . 240 days preceding his purported termination on 29-7-2000 . The parties have led their evidence as well keeping in view the importance of this aspect . He would hence first examine this issue and discuss the evidence adduced by the parties before this Tribunal .

7. The management has examined three witnesses in all namely MW1 , Uma Shankar Singh , Acting Manager, Bank of India, Chapra Branch, MW 2. U.K. Srivastava, Branch Manager, B.O.I. , Chowk Branch Lucknow and MW3 , Ramanand Manjhi , an Officer of B.O.I. , Siwan Branch. MWI is presently posted and acting as Manager atChapraBranch ofB.O.I. since 20-6-2002 . He has deposed onthe basis ofBank's documents . He says that the worker worked there as a casual labourer and never against any permanent vacancy . Such a labourer is paid daily wages for the work done by him and the same is debited under Misc . Head. He further says that the worker as per vouchers worked in the branch from 2-1-99 to 20-11-99 on different dates and he was paid through vouchers exhibited as M/1 to M/44 . He further says that since the worker insisted for his signature on the back of vouchers through which payment was made to him the same was obtained. He further says that no payment has been made to the worker though those vouchers filed on his behalf but not bearing his signatures . He further says that the worker fraudulently put his signatures on two vouchers Exts. M/45 and M/46. This witness also proved salary statements Ext . M/47 and two vouchers Exts . M/ 48 and M/49 to lay stress on the fact that the contesting union has no following in his branch . Ext . M/47 , M/48 and M/49 do not contain worker's name and these documents show that the worker was not a regular subordinate staff in the branch. During cross- examination , he makes it clear that theBranch Manager after receiving the payment of a daily worker pays the same to the worker concerned .

5. The worker Rajiv Kumar Singh has examined himself as the lone witness on his behalf. He states in evidence that he worked in the Bank of India, Chapra Branch from 2-8-96 to 29-7-2000. He attended the Branch regularly from 9.30 A.M. to 6.30 P.M. and he used to serve water, arrange ledgers , carry tokens and Cash Box and also sweep the premises in absence of sweeper . He was paid Rs . 45 /-initially , which was subsequently raised to Rs . 50/- per day. He was paid through vouchers . At the time of termination , he was neither noticed nor was given any compensation. He worked for 240 days in a year preceding his termination . He has also proved a chart (Ext. W/123) prepared by him to show the work done by him on different dates between 18-1-99 to 29-7-2000. During cross- examination, he says that he put his signatures on the payment vouchers through which he was paid his wages . He then explains that he received the cost of newspaper vide Ext . M/47 for making payment to new paper agent as ordered by the then Branch Manager . He further says to have received washing allowance vide Ext . M/46 and put his signature thereon on the instruction of the reimbursing official . He has , however , denied to have signed on aforesaid two exts . purposely for his own game .

8. MW2 and MW3 were in Chapra Branch of the Bank from 4-6-99 to 30-11-2002 and 1995 to 4-6-99 respectively. They both have emphatically stated that the worker casually worked in the Bank on some occasions . Heworked for about 20 to 25 days only during MW2's tenure and he was paid through different vouchers (Ext: M/1 to M/44) for the work done by him . In cross- examination , he admits that the worker was engaged by theBank for the first time on 28-12-1998 and he has worked in all for 160 days only as per Bank records . It may be noted here that in the affidavit dated 16-10-2003 of the Branch Manger, P.C. Sharma , it has been mentioned in para 2 that Sri Rajiv Kumar Singh worked on daily wages from 2-1-99 to 20-11-99 for 160 days but according to MW2 , the worker was engaged for the first time on 28-12-98 - i.e . to say 6 days prior to the date noted in the affidavit. The concerned Ext . M/ 1 also points out that the workerwas paid for the work done as collie from 28-12-98 to 2-1-99, This voucher is dated 2-1-99 and it appears in the circumstances that there has been an inadvertent mistake in the affidavit and the date of voucher has been typed in place of the first date i.e. 28-12-98 when the worker was initially engaged in the Bank . It is not such a vital mistake which can be taken serious note of nor this goes 6. As many as 122 vouchers (Exts . W/ 1 to W/ 122) have also been produced by the worker in order to substantiate his claim that he received payment through them and he worked on those days noted thereon . These vouchers relate with years 1999 and 2000. The last voucher 1130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] tohelp the worker in any manner whatsoever. The date of his first engagement i.e. 28-12-98 , is very clearly typed in the chart attached with the affidavit as " Annexure A" .

worker's favour. Barring these , only remain 32 odd vouchers presented by the worker , which taking together do not establish that he worked for 240 days or more in a calendaryear.

12. The discussion made above in view of the evidence, both oral and documentary , leads us to irresistible and the only conclusion that the worker did not work in Chapra Branch of the Bank of India for 240 days preceding his all eged termination on 29-7-2000 .

9. MW3 states that on some occasions , worker worked casually during his tenure and he was not disengaged till he was there . He further states that through Ext. M/46 the newspaper cost was not disbursed to the worker instead he put his signature on its back with fraudulent intention. He lastly says that a Branch Manager is authorised to engage a casual worker.

13. Now, we come next to whether the termination ofworker is bad in view ofnon -compliance of Sec . 25F of the Act . The requirement of Section is compliance of certain provisions in case of retrenchment of a workman who has been in continuous service for not less than one year. We have already seen and the evidence on record also does so suggest that the worker was a daily wage labourer and he had never been in continuous service for the period required under this Section. A continuous service stands defined in Section 25B of the Act . We find on the strength of the evidence that neither Section 25B nor 25F of the Act can come to the rescue of the worker since he never had been in continuous service with the Bank for one year.

10. The oral testimony before us do very well suggest that a Branch Manager is empowered to engage a worker as and when occasion arises in the Bank and payment is made to such worker by him and he gets reimbursement of the same from the Bank . Management has also tried to establish that such payment is made under Miscellaneous Head through vouchers and since the worker insisted upon his signature was being obtained on vouchers through which his wage was being paidto him. The management has filed only 44 vouchers bearing worker's signature on their back. These vouchers suggest that the worker did work on different dates in between 28-12-98 to 20-11-99 i.e. for about 160 days in all . The management categorically claims that the worker was not engaged in the Bank for any work beyond the dates detailed in the list and as is exhibited by aforesaid fortyfour vouchers .

14. The last question whether the disputant Union has the representative capacity to rightfully espouse the dispute on behalf of the worker is concerned, we have to look to the statements made by the management's witnesses and also Ext. M/47 , M/48 and M/49 . The witnesses have categorically stated that the disputant Union did not represent any of the workers of the Bank concerned at relevant time . The Exts . referred to above do also suggest that some other unions and not the disputant one were credited the contributions from the Bank's staff. On the other hand , there is no evidence worth the name from the other said to show that disputant Union had any representation in the Bank at the relevant time . Although this point appears to be of no importance at all in the light of findings in forgoing paragraphs on two major issues , yet the evidence before us is quite suggestive of the fact that the disputant Union had no representative capacity in rightfully espousing the dispute , which is before us . This point I was required to answer since it was taken as a preliminary objection by the management .

15. In view of what has been discussed above and the materials on record, I am offirm view and accordingly hold as such that the worker Rajiv Kumar Singh did not work as daily rated worker with Bank of India , Chapra Branch for a period of 240 days or more during 12 months preceding his alleged retrenchment nor his so - called retrenchment suffers any way for the violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act and he is not entitled to any relief whatsoever. Reference answered in terms aforesaid.

16. Award accordingly.

Dictated & corrected by me .

11. As against this , the worker has filed 122 vouchers in all ( Exts . W/ 1 to W/ 122) together with a chart Ext. W/ 123 thereby detailing different dates from 18-1-99 to 29-7-2000 , on which the worker performed the work in the Bank . It is to my utter surprise that as many as 90 vouchers amongst those filed by the worker do not contain any " payment seal " of the Bank to show that any payment was in fact made through them. These Exts . are W/1 -W/3, W/6, W/7 , W/ 10 , W/ 13 -W/ 16 , W/ 18 , W/ 20 - W/ 35, W/37- W/40 , W/42, W/44 , W/46 , W/47 , W/50 , W/51 , W/53- W/55 , W/57 , W/64 , W/ 66 , W/ 69 , W/70 , W/72 , W/74 , W/ 77 , W/ 79 . W/ 81 , W/83 , W/85 , W/86, W/88 , W/92 , W/94 , W/95 . W/98 - W/ 112 , W/114 , W/ 115 and W/ 117 , W/ 122, Vouchers upto W/62 are concerned with year 1999 and the remaining are ofthe year 2000. A judicial notice can be taken up the fact and further it is a matter of common experience that whenever payment is made by the Bank , a "Payment Seal " is put on concerned voucher . Aforementioned 90 vouchers without any " payment seal " just mean that no payment was made to any person whatsoever through these documents much less the worker Sri Rajiv Kumar Singh who was always quite conscious to put his signature on the back of a vouchers through which he received payment . All above 90 vouchers appear to be nothing but a clear fabrication and manufacture of evidence issupport of worker's stand that he worked for 240 days or more in 12 calendar months preceding his purported disengagement . The worker appears to have deliberately misled the Tribunal by filing as many as 90 bogus vouchers with no "payment scal " mark at all . These 90 vouchers do not appear to carry any relevance and substance in

PRIYA SARAN , Presiding Officer 1 1131

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2004

the Mgt . of R.S.M.D.C.Ltd . , Jaipur by way of Voluntary Retirement Scheme w.e.f. 31-3-98 is legal and justified and if not to what relief is workman concerned entitled ? "

का.आ. 633.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार राजस्थान राज्यखनिज विकास निगम लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-02-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29012/36/2000- आई.आर. ( एम ) ] बी० एम० डेविड , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th February, 2004

S.O. 633.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Industrial Tribunal , Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in.relation to the management of Rajasthan State Mineral Devleopment Corpn . Ltd. and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 19-02-2004

[No. L- 29012/36/2000- IR (M)]

B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.

अनुबन्ध

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर

पीठासीन अधिकारी श्रीमती निशा गुप्ता, आर.एच.जे.एस.

ओ. वि. ( केन्द्रीय ) सं.:-08/2001

मोलेखान पुत्र श्री भैवरं खान, निवासी रायगढ़ , जिला जैसलमेर ।

प्रार्थी ने अपना मांग- पत्र प्रस्तुत करते हुए अभिकथित किया है कि प्रार्थी को सोनू लाईम स्टोर प्रोजेक्ट, जैसलमेर में सन् 1990 में नियुक्तकिया गया तथा अप्रार्थी ने अपने आदेश दिनांक 12-1-93 से 1-10-92 से प्रार्थी की सेवाएं नियमित कर दी तथा आदेश दिनांक 15-2-97 द्वारा प्रार्थी को 1-10-96 से 798/- रुपये वेतन श्रृंखला पर प्रतिस्थापित किया गया , प्रार्थी ने अपना कार्य पूर्ण समर्पित भावना से किया, सन् 1998 में अप्रार्थी ने प्रार्थी को परेशान करने की नियत से कुछ श्रमिकों का स्थानान्तरण हनुमानगढ़ खदान पर कर दिया , कामगारों द्वारा यह प्रार्थना करने पर कि उससे कई कनिष्ठ कर्मचारी बैठे हुए हैं उनका स्थानांतरण किया जावे ऐसी स्थिति में नियोजक के अधिकारियों ने कामगार को गुमराह करते हुए उससे स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृत्ति हेतु प्रार्थना - पत्र मांग लिये, चूंकि प्रार्थी एक अनपढ़ व्यक्ति था उसने दबाव में आकर सशर्त प्रार्थना- पत्र पेश किया व 31-3-98 तक शर्तों की पालना होने पर अपनी स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति हेतु निवेदन किया, स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति में लिखी शर्तों की आंशिक पालना में 15-1-98 को अप्रार्थी ने आदेश जारी कर प्रार्थी को 26280/- रुपये का भुगतान कर शेष राशि के भुगतान हेतु आईन्दा मामले को विचाराधीन रखा व स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति प्रार्थना-पत्र का हवाला देते हुए आदेश दिनांक 26-3-98 द्वारा प्रार्थी की सेवाएं 31-3-98 से समाप्त कर दी जब कि प्रार्थना पत्र में लिखी शर्तों कोपूर्ण रूप से आज तक पालना नहीं की गई अतः सेवा निवृति अनुचित एवं अवैध है , सेवा समाप्ति से पूर्व नियम 77 की व 25 - जी की पालना नहीं की गई, प्रार्थी से कई कनिष्ठ व्यक्ति आज भी नियोजक के यहां नौकरी कर रहे हैं, अतः धारा. 25- एच का सीधा उल्लंघन किया गया है । अन्तमें निवेदन किया है कि प्रार्थी की 31-3-98 से की गई सेवामुक्ति को अवैध घोषित किया जाकर पुनः सेवा में लिये जाने का आदेश पारित किया जावे तथा बैक वेजेज दिलाया जावे ।

....प्रार्थी

बनाम

राजस्थान राज्य खनिज विकास निगम लि. , खनिज भवन, जयपुर ।

....अप्रार्थी

उपस्थिति:

(1 ) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री एस.डी. खत्री उप.

(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री सुशील कुमार माथुर उप.

अधिनिर्णय

दिनांक 9-12-2003

अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब प्रस्तुत करते हुए कहा गया कि प्रार्थी ने 31-3-98 से स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति प्राप्त करने के लिए प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश किया जिस पर प्रार्थी का त्याग- पत्र स्वीकार किया गया तथा प्रार्थी का1-4-98 से नियोजन समाप्त हो गया, प्रार्थी ने स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति योजना के अन्तर्गत देय अनुग्रह राशि 26280/- रु. प्राप्त की व अन्य देय राशि35000/- भी प्राप्त की, प्रार्थी ने स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति का प्रार्थना- पत्र वापस लेने का कोई आवेदन प्रस्तुत नहीं किया, स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति केमामले में नियोजित श्रमिकों की संख्या तथा श्रमिकों की वरिष्ठता कनिष्ठता कोई अर्थ नहीं रखती , प्रार्थी ने बगैर किसी दबाव के स्वेच्छा सेअप्रार्थी निगम कीस्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति योजना के अन्तर्गत त्याग -पत्र दिया व देय परिलाभ प्राप्त किये , कौनसी शर्त की पालना नहीं की गई यह प्रार्थी ने स्पष्ट नहीं किया है । प्रार्थी का मामला छंटनी में नहीं आता अतः अधिनियम के प्रावधान अथवा नियम लागू नहीं होते । अन्त में निवेदन किया कि प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है । प्रार्थी का मांग - पत्र सव्यय खारिज किया जावे । श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल. 29012/36/2000- आई.आर. (एम. ) दिनांक 29-8-2000 सेनिम्न विवाद्वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है:-

मांग -पत्रके समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा अप्रार्थी की ओर से "Whether the termination of services of Sh . Mole Khan S/o Bhawaru Khan Ex. Sahayak Karamchari by 1132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( 1ⅱ) ] मंगलाराम गुजर का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई । अप्रार्थी की ओर से विभिन्न दस्तावेजों की फोटो प्रतियां पेश की गईं ।

स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति योजना के अन्तर्गत सेवानिवृत किया जाना किसी भी प्रकार से अनुचित और अवैध नहीं है अतः प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष अप्रार्थी से प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

किया । दोनों पक्षों के प्रतिनिधीगण की बहस सुनी, पत्रावली का अवलोकन

यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 9-12-2003 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।

निशा गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2004

प्रार्थी द्वारा यह कहा गया कि उसने विपक्षी के अधीन काम किया उसकी सेवाएं सन्तोषप्रद थीं उससे दबाव में आकर सशर्त त्याग - पत्र ले लिया गया और उसकी सेवाएं समाप्त कर दी गईं जो कि त्रुटिपूर्ण है ।

विपक्षी द्वारा यह कहा गया कि प्रार्थी ने स्वेच्छा से त्याग - पत्र दिया था जो स्वीकार किया जाकर 1-4-98 से उसका नियोजन समाप्त कर दिया गया । प्रार्थी ने स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति योजना के अन्तर्गत देय राशि प्राप्त कर ली है और उसे विदड्रॉ करने का कोई प्रार्थना- पत्र प्रस्तुत नहीं किया है ।

का.आ. 634.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17' के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार प्लाकाटु ग्रेनाइट प्रा० लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय आलपुझा के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-02-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

حمد

[सं. एल-29011/34/2003- आई.आर. ( एम ) ] बी ० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव प्रार्थी ने अपनी प्रतिपरीक्षा में यह स्वीकार किया है कि उसने सेवानिवृति का प्रार्थना- पत्र दिया था और पचास- साठ हजार रुपये उसे मिल गये थे ।

New Delhi , the 19th February , 2004 विपक्षी की ओर से मंगलाराम गुजर सहायक प्रबन्धक कार्मिक एवं प्रशासन पेश हुए हैं जिनका यह कथन है कि प्रार्थी ने स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति का प्रार्थना - पत्र दिया था और उसी आधार पर सेवानिवृति की गई है ।

S.O. 634.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Industrial Tribunal , Alapuzzha as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management Plackattu Granites Pvt . Ltd. and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 19-02-04

[No. L-29011/34/2003 - IR (M) ] B.M. DAVID , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : ALAPPUZHA

प्रार्थी को यह आपत्ति है कि उसके प्रार्थना- पत्र में शर्तें उल्लेखित थीं वे शर्तें पूरी नहीं की गईं और उसे सेवानिवृत कर दिया गया परन्तु यह तर्क आधारहीन है । प्रार्थी द्वारा स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति योजना के अन्तर्गत प्रार्थना- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है और ऐसी स्थिति में शर्तों का कोई महत्व नहीं रह जाता । योजना के अन्तर्गत सेवानिवृति की गई है , प्रार्थी द्वारा सेवानिवृतिसे संबंधित लाभ प्राप्त कर लिये गये हैं ऐसी स्थिति में अब वह सेवानिवृति के सम्बन्ध में कोई आपत्ति करने का अधिकारी नहीं है जैसा कि एस. बी. सिविल रिट पिटीशन नम्बर 3650/98 अम्बादा बनाम आर. एल. एम. डी. सी. में माननीय राजस्थान उच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्धारित किया गया है ।

(Dated this the 3rd day ofJanuary , 2004)

PRESENT:

SHRI K. KANAKACHANDRAN , Industrial Tribunal

I. D. No. 47/03 (C)

Between

TheManaging Director, Plackattu Granites Pvt. Ltd. , Payyanamon , P.O. Konni , Pathanamthitta

And

प्रार्थी का यह कथन है कि स्वैच्छिक सेवानिवृति योजना उन्हीं व्यक्तियों पर लागू होती है जिन्होंने दस वर्ष की सेवा पूर्ण कर ली हो या जिनकी उम्र 40 वर्ष पूर्ण हो चुकी है । परन्तु यह तर्क मान्य नहीं है । 12-6-90 का जो कार्यालय आदेश पेश हुआ हैं उसमें भी यह स्थिति स्पष्ट की गई है कि जो व्यक्तिसेवानियमों के अन्तर्गत कवर नहीं होता उन श्रमिकों पर भी यह योजना लागू होती है और जब प्रार्थी स्वयं ने सेवानिवृति हेतु प्रार्थना- पत्र पेश किया है तो अब वह सेवानिवृति के सम्बन्धमें कोई आपत्ति पेश नहीं कर सकता और उसकी सभी आपत्तियां निराधार हैं ।

The workman of the above concern represented by TheGeneral Secretary , Pathanamthitta District Quarry and Crusher Workers Congress ( INTUC), Malayalapuzha

इस प्रकार प्रार्थी को सेवानिवृति योजना के अन्तर्गत सेवानिवृत किया जाना किसी भी प्रकार अनुचित और अवैध नहीं है और प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष पाने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

AWARD

अधिनिर्णय

1. The Government of India by the reference order No. 29011/34/2003 ( RIM ) dated 27-8-03 has referred the 'following issues for adjudication:

अतः यह अधिनिर्णित किया जाता है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक आर. एल. एम. डी. सी. लि. , जयपुर द्वारा प्रार्थी मोलेखान पुत्र भैवरु खान को i

1133 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

AWARD

Byletter dated 9-7-1991 the following points has been referredto by the Ministry of Labour for adjudication .

"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Plackattu Granite (Private) Ltd. , Payyanamon, P.O. , Konni , Pathanamthitta District, Kerala State in terminating the services of Sh . C. P. Babu, Peon with effect from 10-1-2003 is justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

"Whether the action of the management is not considering the case of Sh . Balwant Singh for the full time Sweeper/Peon is justified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to . "

It has been stated that Balwant Singh belonged to scheduled caste . He was posted as the cleaner from 1992 onthe western Bikaner Branch and at present he is getting ¼ofthe salary.

2. In response to notice , only the management party entered appearance through a counsel. Initially there was no appearance on the side of union . However when this dispute was posted on 15-12-2003 a Counsel representing the union had submitted that the matter had been settled . Thatsettlement is recorded and passed an award holding that no industrial dispute is subsisting between the parties now.

(Dated this the 3rd day of January , 2004)

K. KANAKACHANDRAN, Industrial Tribunal

नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2004

Ithas been stated that besides cleaning work, the work ofpeon was also taken from him he was engaged in going to different branches for bringing stationery , to the postoffice for telegram and registers letter and stamps . He used to go to the I.T.O. for depositing income tax return. He was sent to deposit the electricity bill , water charges , telephone bills , etc. There is no peon for many years in the office. Sh. Balwant Singh had been doing the work ofpeon from 1982. The bank has paid him D.A. also .

So far as cleaning and sweeping work is concerned he has to clean and sweep 4400 square yards for more than 30 hours every week so the work done by him comesunder the full payment of a sweeper and the cleaner . He work of the peon is in addition to this .

का.आ. 635.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और. उनके कंर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई ० डी० सं ० 85/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/ 160/91 - आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th February, 2004

It has been further submitted that he was from the very beginning demanding full pay. He gave an application to give him full pay and to transfer him at the post ofpeon but the bank refused on 28-2-1985 . On the other hand , on several dates upto 8-3-1990 Sh . Balwant Singh gave application and his applications were rejected .

When requirements of peon was made Sh . Balwant Singh on 26-11-1984 gave an application but he was told that the bank would consider the names sent from the employment exchange.

S.O. 635. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (1. D. No. 85/91 ) of the Central Government Irindustrial Tribunal / Labour Court 11 , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 20-2-2004.

[No. L- 12012/160/91 - IR (B- 1 ) ]

Again on 7-5-1987 and 2-6-1987 he gave application to the bank . It was a part time cleaner and sweeper is not eligible for interview ."Thereafter on several dates upto. 8-3-1991 he gave an applications to appoint him as Peon but he was not called for interview .

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING, OFFICER : CENTRAL

It has been further submitted that in bipartite settlement in paragraph 20 (6) it is necessary that preference should be given to the part time workers for filling up the vacant post.

GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

It has also been directed by the Ministry of Finance to the banks that 25% post should be kept reserved for sweepers / cleaners/chowkidar whether they have qualification for appointment to the post of peon or not .

I. D. No. 85/91

Presiding Officer : R.N. RAI

BalwantSingh

V/s

It has been further submitted that since the bank paid no attention to the several applications on 2-6-90 by Registered letter president of the union sent the letter but still the bank gave no reply . At the last application was given to the Assistant Labour Commissioner. But the matter could not be decided.

State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur 1134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] It has been prayed that the workman should get peon'spay from 9-9-82 whatever the court deems fit . He should be given all the facilities to which a peon is entitled.

Management has filed in his WS , it has been stated that para I of the statement of claim/ petition is correct and needs no reply.

letter dated 16-5-87 . The workman was informed by this letter that there is no information that the peons are being recruited in the Bank. It is correct that the workman has sent other applications as mentioned in the petition. Since the Bank has invited applications from the temporary employees only and the instant workman does not come under that category . The workman is permanent part time employee of the management.

That para 6 ofthe workman is a matter of record, and has been replied as started in para 5 above . The workman was not appointed at the post of peon, as stated by the orkman , not because of any discrimination, but due to the rules and laws applicable to the Bank . The application ofthe workman was rejected because it was not through the employment exchange . Which was one of the most essential criteria for entertaining the applications of the candidates . Secondly, the workman was not one of the candidates from the temporary-employees who have served the Bank . Rest of para 6 ( a) and (b) is legal and a matter of record:

That para 7 ofthe petition is wrong . The management has replied all the letters addressed by the workman . It is correct that their was a failure of concilation before the Labour Commissioner , New Delhi and hence this reference.

That para 2 of the petition is wrong hence denied. The workman was appointed as a part time sweeper and is performing the duties of ci aning the Bank presmises . The workman used to come to the Pesnim Vihat Branch of the answering bank and does only sweeper job . The workman never did more than the working hours as applicable to hin from time to time . At present the workman is drawing 3/4 salary from the Bank . It is wrong that ine workman has ever did the peon work . It is submitted that right from the inception of the Bank branch at Paschim Vihar , the Bank has a peon and Guard. Since , 1982 , there was always a Peon/Daftari in the Bank except for a few months in 1990 . At no point of time the workman was ever ordered by the management , to perform the duties of a peon. It is wrong that there is no peon in the Bank for the last so many years . It is also wrong to allege that the workman is performing the duties of a peon since 9-9-82 or ever thereafter . It is correct that the Bank has made some payments to the workman towards conveyance charges, but that is paid only when the workman requested the Branch Manager of the Bank to oblige him to go for some work .

Para 3 of the petition is correct and is admitted. It is submitted that the work assigned to the workman does not require more that 29 hours a week i.e. 4 and 1½ hours a day. The area of the premises of the Bank is not.4400 sq yards but4400 sq feet .

Thatpara 8 of the petition is wrong hence denied. Theworkman is not entitled for the post of full time peon since 9-9-82 . At no point of time before , 24-11-84 , the workman has ever applied for the post of the peon , and has ever did the job of peon in the Bank of answering management . The workman has no right to claim wages of the work which he has never rendered to the Bank . No claim of such type ever been raised by the workman to the Bank hence is not entitled for such wages . In no application , submitted by the workman , the workman has ever demanded any wages for performing the job /work of a peon in the Bank . The workman has never claimed from the Bank that he has performed the duties peon in the Bank .

That para 4 of the petition is wrong and has no iota oftruth , hence denied . The work assigned to the workman was not more than of 29 hours a week and the workman has never been asked to stayed beyond his schedule time of 29 hours a week . No work of the peon has ever taken by the management from the workman ,

It is, therefore, prayed that the application/ petition ofthe workman may kindly be dismissed .

Theworkman has filed rejoinder and all the pleadings of the statement of claim has been reiterated it has been also submitted that the workman has been paid T.A. and he has done all the work of a peon and Daftari from 9-9-1982 to 31-3-1990 but he was not appointed a permanent peon through he has been done all the work of a peon as well as the sweeper . The written statement of the bank in this respect is false .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the record.

That para 5 of the petition is misconceived hence denied . The workman has never been put to work more than the work he deserved as per the terms of work, from time to time. As the work of the workman increased , the management has considered the genuine demand of the workman and has increased his wages from Rs . 60 to /, to 1½ and ½ from time to time . The work man never objected to the increase/er: hancement made by the management. It is submitted that this workınan was appointed in 1982 and of scale wages were given from 1-4-84 . The wages were increased from , to ½ of wages scale from 1-7-86 and to ½ since January 1987. The application dated 24-11-84 of the workman was not considered since the same was not forwarded through Employment Exchange as required by Ministry of Finance letter No. 11 / 17/ 85-1R dated May 2, 1985 and the reply of the same was handed over to the workman on 28-2-85 . The Management has also replied the application dated 7th May , 1987 of the workman , vide its

Papers have been annexed with the record . These papers show that the workman has been given T.A. for various works . He has been given conveyance expenditure for discharging his duties allotted to him by the Bank. These papers have been admitted by the Bank . This establishes 1136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 13 , 2004/ PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

properly with the local people and consequently apprehending threat to his life, he was transferred to Sulagiri branch which will reveal the nature and attitude of the concerned employee . The official irregularities of Mr. S. Sethu , sub - staff as alleged by the concerned employee is of no relevanceto this case, the concerned employee has beenpunished for the acts of misconduct duly proved at the enquiry held for that purpose . The acts of the misconduct.committed by the concerned employee are as follows:-

While working as Agricultural Assistant at Samathur branch , Mr. M. Selvaraj , the concerned employee on 4-6-96 at about 4.00 p.m. started updating the casual leave availed details on the rear page of attendance register and while doing so, he marked 28-5-96 as casual leave for Mr. Sethu , Daftriofthebranch , when actually it was on 27-5-96. When it was pointed out, the concerned employee used offensive words at him and started arguing further and the Branch Manager came out of the cabin and pacified . Then again the concerned employee started passing indirect comments onMr. Sethu. At about 4.15 p.m. the concerned employee indulged in shouting at Mr. Sethu in a high pitch and in the height of temper, picked up the stone and charged towards Mr. Sethu with an intention to cause injury to the person and engaged in manhandling him . Only after due enquiry , the Enquiry Officer has given the finding that the charges framed against him had been proved . In that departmental enquiry, the concerned employee was given enough opporthnity to defend his case and principles of natural justice was complied with throughout . Since the Disciplinary Authority's note is an internal document , a copy of which was not given to the concerned employee . The fact remains that Mr. Sethu suffered at the hands of the concerned employee and the concerned employee paid Rs . 300/- to Mr. Sethu for medical expenses which was brought out clearly during the enquiry and the same was not disputed by the concerned employee . Since the act of the concerned employee causing bodily injury that too in office premises during the office hours is of serious nature and spoiled the morale and discipline among the staff members and no disciplinary action was initiated and therefore , the petitioner cannot question the action taken by the Respondent. Thus , the charges were clearly proved in the enquiry and he imposed the punishment of stoppage of two increments commensurate with the gravity of the charges after giving him all reasonable opportunity and after following the principles of natural justice . Hence, the Respondent prays that the claim has to be dismissed with costs .

branch .While carrying out updating , he had done a mistake and he marked the casual leave for the said Sethu for 28-5- 96 instead of 27-5-96 . When it was pointed out by Sethu , the concerned employee represented that he will place the record before Manager and he could retrieve the same . But Mr. Sethu turned violent and started abusing the concerned workman with filthy language and on hearing his shout, the Branch Manager came to the place intervened and pacified both of them . When this was the actual facts and events on 4-6-96 , the II Party/ Management has placed the concerned employee under suspension with immediate effect by an order dated 25-7-96 and they have also issued charge memo on 24-8-96 with four allegations . When the concerned employee by his letter dated 5-9-96 made his protest against the suspension order and also asked for copies of complaint and the report of the investigating officials , the bank informed him that the documents could be furnished only at the stage of enquiry and rejected his request . Subsequently , when the charge memo was issued, he has given his explanation , but the explanation was not accepted by the bank authorities and a departmental enquiry was ordered. After that finding was given that the charges have been proved and he was asked to give an explanation and not satisfied with that explanation, they have given the punishment. Even at the enquiry the Presenting Officer declined to produce Disciplinary Authority's note on the ground that it was not a practice to give certain documents for enquiry purpose . Further when the Branch Manager had complained against hoth the concerned workman and Mr. Sethu , no disciplinary action was taken against Mr. Sethu and no reason was given , as to why the concerned workman alone was singled out and discriminated for initiating disciplinary action. The decision taken by the Disciplinary Authority is therefore , biased , one sided malafide and discriminatory. Further , without furnishing the copy of the findings , the Disciplinary Authority straight away concurred with the findings of the Enquiry Officer and proposed to impose the punishment ofwaming for charge No. 1 and 2 , stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect for charge No. 3 and stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect for charge No. 4. This is in utter disregard to the principles of naturaljustice. Therefore , the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority dated 10-3-98 is biased , one sided and discriminatory. The complaint is belated and the alleged negligence will not constitute misconduct particularly when it was not wilful and therefore, the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer is perverse and contraryto the evidence in the enquiry . Hence , for the above reasons , the petitioner prays that an award may be passed in his favour for reinstatement with other consequential relief.

5. Under these circumstances, the points for my determination are :-

4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Petitioner Union has suppressed certain material facts . The concerned employee Mr. Selvaraj was initially appointed at Barur branch and subsequently transferred to Sulagiri branch . While working atBarur branch , the concerned employee has not behaved

(i) "Whether the action of the management of Respondent/Bank in imposing the punishment of stoppage of increments for two years with cumulative effect against the concerned workman Sri M. Selvaraj is justified?" 1137

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 13 , 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(ii) " If not , to what relief Sri M. Selvaraj is entitled ?"

Point No. 1 :-

the findings of the Enquiry Officer and therefore , they have confirmed the findings and it is not the case of the Petitioner that both the authorities have not applied their mind with regard to their findings because the findings are based on evidence of the witnesses . Further , it is the contention of the Respondent that no complaint against Mr. Sethu was made by the Branch Manager and therefore, no action was taken against Mr. Sethu , sub - staff.

9.Again, on behalf of the Petitioner, it is contended that in a staff meeting on 5-6-96 , the matter was compromised and they have decided not to report the same to higher officials and therefore , the Respondent/ Management's action was not correct and they are estopped from initiating action 'based on the belated complaint given by Mr. Sethu and that too long after the incident. Further, it is the contention of the Petitioner that the management has not given any reason for the inordinate delay in giving complaint and also the action taken by the management . Further , it is the contention of the Petitioner that the allegation in the charge are vague and unsustainable . The unauthorised updating of casual leave account and negligence in charge did not go together , therefore , the charge is very vague .

6. The charges against the concerned workman in this case are while he was working as an Agricultural Assistant at Samathur branch , he has started on his own , updating casual leave availed details on the rear page of the attendance register and he has marked 28-05-1996 as casual leave for Mr. Sethu instead of 27-05-1996. Secondly, he used offensive words against Mr. Sethu during that course of time . Thirdly , even after the Branch Manager's advise he has started passing indirect comments on Mr. Sethu and indulged in such practice affecting the office decorum and fourthly he has indulged in shouting at Mr. Sethu in a high pitch and in the height of his temper he picked up a stone in the Manager's cabin door and charged Mr. Sethu with an intention to cause injury to him and engaged in manhandling him . Even for the first and second charges , the Respondent/Management has considered it as minor misconduct and they have imposed the punishment ofwarning only with regard to the charge Nos . 3 and 4, which according to them are major misconducts and given punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect for the 3rd charge and for the 4th charge they have given punishment of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect .

10. But, on the other hand , the Respondent contended that causing bodily injury that too in the office premises during the office hours is severe nature and therefore , it cannot be brushed aside that it is a minor one . Further , the Petitioner has made bodily injury to Mr. Sethu and he has also paid Rs . 300/- as compensation for medical expenses . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the complaint is a belated one and action was taken long after the incident . Further , updating the casual leave account is not the duty of the concerned workman and it was not allotted to him also . Under such circumstances , it is false to allege that the charges framed against him are vague and unsustainable .

11. The Petitioner further contended that even the clerical mistake crept in the casual leave account is inadvertent and it can be rectified and therefore, no loss or prejudice caused either to the bank or to Mr. Sethu and therefore , the alleged negligence will not constitute misconduct and therefore, the finding ofthe Enquiry Officer isperverse.

7. As against this , the concerned workman has raised so many allegations against the punishment given to him. He alleged that the Disciplinary Authority failed to furnish copy ofthe findings to him and sought his views. Though he has raised this objection and specifically pointed out during his personal hearing before the Disciplinary Authority , he has simply confirmed his provisional conclusions without looking into the submissions made by him and it is contrary to the principles of natural justice . He further contended that even the Appellate Authority has not considered his submissions and he has also committed the same mistake by concurring with the findings of the Enquiry Officer. Both the Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority failed to take into account the unblemished long service of the Petitioner before imposing the punishment which is against the provisions of Bipartite Settlement . It is his further contention that when the Branch Manager of Samathur has made an allegation against both the concerned workman and Mr. Sethu , taking disciplinary action only against him alone is mala fide and discriminatory .

12. As against this , the Respondent contended that evenduring the incident, even during the heated exchange ofwords between Mr. Sethu and the concerned workman , Mr. Selvaraj , the concerned workman has taken the stone and caused injury on the face ofthe sub - staff and therefore , it cannot be said that it will not constitute a misconduct and no loss or prejudice will be caused either to the bank or to Mr. Sethu .

13. It is the further contention of the Petitioner that there is no cogent or corroborative evidence with regard to the occurrence except the oral , interested or testimony of Mr. Sethu and the Enquiry Officer had relied on the statement given before the investigation officer by MW5 8. As against this , on behalf of the Respondent it was contended that full opportunity was given to the concerned workman before imposing the punishment and by saying that copy of findings was not furnished before the proposal of punishment is made against him is of no consequence and no prejudice will be caused to the Petitioner /Workman by not issuing copy of the findings before the proposal . Further , the Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority has no reason to interfere with

689G1/2004-16 1138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13 , 2004/ PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ground that they have not supported the case of the Respondent/Management and when they have not been treated as hostile witnesses .

18. Here again , as already stated, the Respondent contended that in the domestic enquiry strict and sophisticated rule of evidence is not applicable and the Enquiry Officer logically came to the conclusion that these MW4 to MW6 gave false evidence before the enquiry after signing in the recorded statements . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the finding of the Enquiry Officer is not correct .

and MW6 . Even while MW5 and MW6 have stated that they have not read the contents of the statements and statements were obtained by force , the Enquiry Officer should hold that there is no corroborative evidence with regard to the incident but, surprisingly he has taken the statements as true one and on that score , he has come to the conclusion that the charges have been proved against the Petitioner , which is not legal and correct . In this case , MW5 and MW6 were not treated as hostile witnesses in the enquiry and while they have denied their own statements given before the investigation officer , such statements cannot be taken into account and no reliance can be placed on the signed statements of the witnesses .

19. Again , the counsel for Petitioner argued that the allegations are made with regard to single incident and the management cannot split into several charges and imposed punishment on each one . Further, it is contended that Respondent/Management did not even treat the period of suspension as duty and therefore , imposing another punishment on the Petitioner is a clear case of legal victimisation and also unfair labour practice by the Respondent/Management .

14. On the other hand , it was argued on behalfofthe Respondent that the staff of the Samathur Branch subsequently won over by the Petitioner and they have stated without reading the contents of the document , they have signed before the superior authority and such incident has not taken place . But the Enquiry Officer after considering their evidences and after considering that they are literate employees signed in the statements stating that they have not gone through the contents of the documents is false one and he has come to the right conclusion that during the enquiry , they have given a false evidence and on that score he has rejected the contention of the concerned employee and has come to the conclusion that the incident has taken place and only in the incident the Petitioner has charged Mr. Sethu and injured him on his face and therefore , on no ground the findings of the Enquiry Officer can be questioned .

20. But, again the counsel for the Respondent contended that the charges clearly stated what are all the misconducts done by the Petitioner/Workman though the incident is a single one . By this incident , he has made so many misconducts and for each misconduct the Respondent/Management has taken action against the concerned workman . It is also contended that the incident happened on 4-6-96. Sri Sethu took treatment from Dr. Natchimuthu and Dr. Ramanathan for swelling on his left eye and he produced bills and prescription for medicines . Itisthe further evidence that Petitioner /Workman has made an open apology and paid Rs . 300/ - for medical expenses to Mr. Sethu and in such circumstances , it cannot be said that the prescription and the certificates should not be admitted before the enquiry .

15. Again, on behalf of the Petitioner it was argued that the Enquiry Officer has committed a grave error in > " ov ng th medical certificate before the enquiry without ex. raning u. Doctor particularly when the same was dised by the Petitioner . Further , the prescription given tv Dr. Ramana nan was only for ulcer and asthma and not for injury on the face. Furthermore , Mr. Sethu has admitted that he did not have ulcer or asthma and in these circumstances it is evident that the prescriptions produced were not for the pain or attack on Mr. Sethu and on this . the finding of the Enquiry Officer is against

16. For this , on behalf of the Respondent it was Contended that the domestic enquiry is not a criminal enquiry as contemplated under the law and therefore , strict and sophisticated rule of evidence under Indian Evidence Actdo not apply to domestic enquiry and on material which are logically probative for prudent mind is permissible in domestic enquiry and in this case , even though the prescription contained so many medicines , it also contains medicines for pain and therefore , it cannotbe said that reliance on medical certificate is bad in law .

17.Again the counsel for the Petitioner argued that the finding of the Enquiry Officer is biased and partisan attitude which is clearly established from his attitude , when be dismissed the oral evidence of MW5 and MW6 on the

21. Again , the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this case would not be governed by Section 11A for the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and this Tribunal can havejurisdiction to interfere with the findings of the EnquiryOfficer only if the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse or in a sense that they are wholly unsupported by any evidence . In this case , it is clearly established before the Enquiry Officer that the concerned workman has attacked Mr. Sethu and he has made bodily injury on Mr. Sethu and therefore , the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer are not perverse . It is his further contention that with regard to punishment, this Tribunal in such a case would not have jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment imposed on the ground that punishment is disproportionate to the charges proved because , it is not a case under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 but it is only under section 2k of the Industrial Disputes Act . Further , it is only in case ofdischarge or dismissal by way of punishment that Section 11A vests discretionary jurisdiction in the Tribunal to direct reinstatement with or without any terms or conditions or to vary the punishment as the 1139 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 13, 2004/फाल्गुन 23, 1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Commissioner (Central)

W7 10-03-2000 Xerox copy of the rejoinder filed byUnion

W8 04-02-97/ 24-02-97

Xerox copy of the letters from Union to Respondent circumstances of a case may warrant and it does not apply to other cases such as warning , fine , withholding of. increment, demotion or suspension etc. and therefore , it is not open to the Petitioner of invite this Tribunal to re- appreciate the evidence and take a different view from that oftheEnquriyOfficer .

For the II Party/Management:--

Description

Ex. No. Date

28-08-96

Xerox copy of the show- cause notice

M2 12-10-96

Xerox copy of the reply to show- cause notice

M3 24-10-96

Xerox copy of the revised show- cause notice

M4 13-12-96

22. I find much force in this contention because the petitioner Association has not established that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse or it is not their case that no evidence was adduced before the Enquriy Officer to come to such conclusion by the Enquiry Officer. Under such circumstances , I am of the opinion that this Tribunal cannot interfere with the findings of the Enquiry Officer , as the same is not vitiated and this Tribunal also cannot hold that the punishment imposed on the concerned workman Mr. M. Selvaraj by the Respondent/Bank is not justified. Therefore , I find this point against the Petitioner .

Xerox copy of the reply to revised show - cause notice Point No. 2:

27-12-96

Xerox copy of the charge sheet issued to Petitioner The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

M6 16-07-97 Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings

05-02-98

Xerox copy of the enquiry findings.

18-05-98

23. In view of my foregoing finding that the finding ofEnquriy Officer is not vitiated , I find the concerned employee in this industrial dispute Sri M. Selvaraj is not entitled to any relief as prayed for by the Petitioner Union . No Costs .

Xerox copy of the written submissions made by Petitioner 24. The reference is answered accordingly .

M9 13-06-98

Xerox copy of the proceedings of personal hearing .

M10 11-07-98

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed any typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 5th January , 2004.)

Xerox copy of the order of Disciplinary Authority K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

M11 24-08-98

Witnesses Examined:--

Xerox copy ofthe appeal preferred by Petitioner

: WW1 Sri K. Kirshnan

For the 1 Party/Workman

M12 27-11-98

Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority For the II Party/Management : None

Documents Marked :-

नई दिल्ली, 4 मार्च, 2004 For the 1 Party/Claimant :-

Description

Ex. No. Date

25-07-96

W1 Xerox copy of the suspension order

05-09-96

Xerox copy ofthe letter from Mr. Selvaraj

W3 20-09-96

Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Bank to Mr. Selvaraj

का.आ. 637.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 अप्रैल, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

09-05-97

Xerox copy of the letter from concerned workman

06-09-99

W5 Xerox copy of the letter from Petitioner Union

" जिला, राजस्व तहसील एवं परगना लखनऊ के अन्तर्गत राजस्व ग्राम- धांवा, नौबस्ता कलां एवं नगर निगम वार्ड चिनहट तथा राजस्व परगना महोना, तहसील बक्सी का तालाब के अन्तर्गत राजस्व ग्राम- गोयला" ।

[सं. एस-38013/09/2004-एस.एस. - 1 ] To Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central )

के.सी. जैन , निदेशक 12-01-2000

Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent to Assistant Labour 1140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 13, 2004 /PHALGUNA 23 , 1925

New Delhi , the 4th March , 2004 S.O. 637.- In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section (3 ) of Section1. of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (except Sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 8 ! which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act site!! come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttardesh namely:-

"Areas Comprising the revenue village. of Dhanwa, Naubasta -Kala & Nagar Nigam War.. Chinhat in revenue Pargar Tehsil Lucknow and revenue village-Goela in revenue Pargana- Mahona, Tehsil - Bakshi Ka Talab in the District of Lucknow" .

[No. S-38013/09/2004- SS.I ]

K.C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली, 4 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 638.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा-76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

" जिला गाजियाबाद की बढ़ी गाजियाबाद नगर पालिका सीमा के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र ( उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा जारी अधिसूचना संख्या-2680/9-7-1 जी.वी. दिनांक 04-08- 1995 द्वारा शामिल गाँव " ) ।

[सं. एस -38013/11/2004- एम.एस.- 1 ]

के.सी. जैन , निदेशक New Delhi , the 4th March , 2004

S.O. 638.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI ( except Sub - section ( i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely:--

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] "Extended Municipal limit of Ghaziabad in the District of Ghaziabad ( As noitified by the Government of Uttar Pradesh vide Notification No. 2680/9-7-1 G.V. dated 4-8-1995)"

[No. S- 38013/11/2004- SS -1 ]

K.C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली, 4 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 639.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1934) की धारा 1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियम करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4(44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा-76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले. ही प्रवृत की चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्यके निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

"जिला- बुलन्दशहर की तहसील एवं राजस्व परगना खुर्जा के अन्तर्गत राजस्व ग्राम मन्जपुर, अगवाल, वेथरूपुर, बन्टौली, धरपा, नेहरूपुर, कपालपुरा, वाजिदपुर, हजरतपुर, मुरारीनगर, बरोली, आबिदानगर, मुन्डा खेड़ा रोड छीटोला, नगला कोठी, चाक चन्दा, जंक्शन रोड़ इण्डस्ट्रियल स्टेट एंवतेना" ।

[सं. एस -38013/10/2004 - एस.एस.-1 ] के.सी. जैन , निदेशक New Delhi , the 4th March, 2004

S.O. 639. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI ( except Sub- section ( i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely :-

"Areas Comprising the revenue villages of Manjpur, Agwal , Bantauli , Dharpa, whthrupur, Nehrupur, Kapalpura, Wazidpur, Hazaratpur, Murari Nagar , Baroli , Abida Nagar, Munda Khera Road, Nagala Kothi , Chitola, Chack Chanda, Junction Road Industiral Estate and Tena in revenue Pargana and Tehsil Khurja in the District of Buland Shahar" .

[No. S-38013/10/2004- SS- 1 ]

K.C. JAIN , Director Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.