This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी एल (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

RÉGD. No. DL (N)04/0007/2003-05 भारतका राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 13]

No. 13]

नई दिल्ली, मार्च 21- मार्च 27 , 2004, शनिवार/चैत्र 1 चैत्र7, 1926 NEW DELHI, MARCH 21- MARCH 27, 2004, SATURDAY/CHAITRA 1-CHAITRA 7, 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजाणविभाग) केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड नई दिल्ली, 21 जनवरी, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 699.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " दि लेट इरवाद डी.बी. मेहतास जोरो स्ट्रियन अन्जुमन अतस अदारन, कोलकता " को वर्ष 2002-03 से 2004-05 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्: - ( i) कर- निर्धारित अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में 826 GI/ 2004

(1273)

विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उ‌द्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 25/2004/फा.सं. 197/71/2003- आई.टी.ए.- I. ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव [PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(Department of Revenue)

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004

(INCOME TAX)

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

S. O. 699.- In exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub - clause (v) of clause (23C ) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " The Late Ervad D.B. Mehta's Zoroastrian Anjuman Atash Adaran , Kolkata " for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसारं अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

(ii) the assessce will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section ( 5 ) of Section 11 ;

[अधिसूचना सं. 24/2004/फा.सं. 197/167/2003- आई.टी.ए.- I. ] आई. पी. एस. विन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st January, 2004. (INCOME TAX)

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ;

(c) that in the event ofdissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation wath samudar objectives .

S. O. 700. In exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub - clause (v) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Gurdwara Bara Sikh Sangat , M.G. Road, Kolkata" for the purpose of the said Sub-clause for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2005-06 subject to the following conditions , namely :--

Notification to . 25/2004 F.No. 197 / 71 / 2003 /ITA -I ] I.P.S. BINDRA , Under Secy .

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

नई दिल्ली , 21 जनवरी , 2004

(आयकर )

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5 ) of Section 11;

का. आ. 700. आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की थारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " गुरूद्वारा बाड़ा सिख संगत, एम. जी. रोड, कोलकता " को वर्ष 2003-04 से 2005-06 तक के लिए विन्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business in incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of (1) करिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1275

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives ,

[Notification No. 24/2004/F.No. 197/ 167/2003/ΙΤΑ- Π

I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 जनवरी , 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 701.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 (1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र, सरकार एतद्वारा " कुदालसंगम्. डवलपमेंट बोर्ड जिला बागाल कोट, कर्नाटक " को वर्ष 1999-2000 से 2001-2002 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप- खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

( i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसाकारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 37/2004/फा.सं. 197 / 193 /2003 - आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th January , 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 701. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -clause(v) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Government hereby notifies the "Kudalsangam Development Board, Distt. Bagal Kot , Karnataka" for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 subject to the following conditions , namely: ---

(1) the assessee will not apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of Section 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of disolution. its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisatior with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 37 /2004 /F.No . 197/ 193 / 2003 /TTA- I ] 1.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी, 2004 आयकर

का. आ. 702.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 (1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " नेशलन चिल्ड्रेन्स फण्ड, हौज खास, नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 1999-2000 से 2001-2002 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , 'नर्थात्:-

( i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

1276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

(ii) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तुआदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, ओकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिएप्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उ‌द्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं . 50/2004/फा.सं. 197/176/ 2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th February, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 702. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct , 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Government hereby notifies the "National Children's Fund , Hauz Khas , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessinent years 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5 ) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordancewith the provisions of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ;

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 50/2004/F.No . 197/ 176/2003/TTA- I ] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2004 आयकर

का. आ. 703.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उप- खंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " ज्योतिर्मठ बद्रिकाश्रम हिमालय , श्री गुरु पादुका भवन, कोलकाता " को वर्ष 2002- 2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप- खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्: - (i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगी जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर- निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा (5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर-जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगा, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

7 (v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उ‌द्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 51/2004/फा.सं. 197/190/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th February , 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 703.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - clause (iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

notifies the " Jyotirmath Badrikashram Himalaya , Sri Guru Paduka Bhawan , Kolkata" for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 51/2004/F.No . 197 / 190/2003 /ITA-I ]

I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 19 फरवरी , 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 704.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " दि हिन्दूवीमेन्स वेलफयर सोसायटी श्रद्धानन्द महिला आश्रम माटूंगा ( ईस्ट ) , मुम्बई " को वर्ष 1999-2000 से 2001-2002 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर - निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षितः स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकंगा;

1277

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र7 , 1926

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्तिके लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv ) कर निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 52/2004/फा.सं. 197/192/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ] आई. पी . एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th February, 2004 (INCOME - TAX)

S. O. 704.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (v) of clause (23C) of section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act , 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "The Hindu Women's Welfare Society Shraddhanand Mahila Ashram , Matunga (East) , Mumbai" for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5 ) of Section 11;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax-authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act , 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 52/2004/F.No . 197/ 192/ 2003/TTA-I ] 1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

1278

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2004

(आयकर )

का. आ. 705.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " सेन्टर फार सोशल स्टडीज सूरत " को वर्ष 1995-1996 से 1997-1998 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहींहोगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी 'जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं . 53/2004/फा.सं . 197/194/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th February , 2004

(INCOME - TAX)

S. O. 705. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (v ) of clause ( 23C) of section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Centre for Social Studies Surat " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1995-1996 to 1997-1998 subject to the following conditions , namely:----

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established ;

(ii) the assessee will invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub -section (5) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income - tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event ofdissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation withsimilar objectives.

[Notification No. 53/2004 /F.No . 197/194/2003/ITA -I] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2004

(आयकर )

का. आ. 706.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " रामकृष्णा अभेदानन्दा मिशन, कोलकाता" को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

7 ( ii ) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदिकिसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी , जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1279 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

काप्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " श्री कदमपुझा भागवती देवास्वोम, डाकघर-कदमपुझा, मालाप्पुरम जिला, केरल " को वर्ष 1995-1996 से 1997-1998 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्:-

[अधिसूचना सं. 65/2004/फा.सं. 197/184/2003-आई. टी. ए.- I ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

(i) कर- निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

( ii ) कर-निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

S. O. 706.- In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -clause (iv) of clause (23C) of section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Ramakrishna Abhedananda Mission , Kolkata " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned abové other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub -section (5) of section 11;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

[अधिसूचना सं. 68/2004/फा.सं. 197/178/2003- आयकर नि.-I ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th March, 2004 (INCOME - TAX)

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 65/2004/F.No . 197/184/2003/ΙΤΑ-I]

S. O. 707.- In exercise of powers conferred by Sub- clause (v) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sree Kadampuzha Bhagavathi Devaswom , P.O. Kadampuzha Malappuram District , Kerala" for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1995-1996 to 1997-1998 subject to the following conditions , namely:

I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च , 2004

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(आयकर)

का. आ. 707, आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) 1280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5) of section 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 68/2004/F.No . 197/178/2003/1TA-I ] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 8 मार्च , 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 708.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 (1961 का43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " श्री कदमपुझा भागवती देवास्वोम, डाकघर- कदमपुझा, मालाप्पुरम ज़िला, केरल " को वर्ष 1998-1999 से 2000-2001 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर-जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उ‌द्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी।

[अधिसूचना सं. 69/2004/फा.सं. 197/179/2003-आयकर नि.-I ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 8th March, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

S.O. 708. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -clause (v) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "Sree Kadampuzha Bhagavathi Devaswom , P.O. Kadampuzha Malappuram District, Kerala " for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2000-2001 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for anyperiod during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub -section (5 ) of section 11;

(in) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 69/2004/F.No.197/ 179/2003 /TTA- I ] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 709.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा " श्रीमान माधव 1281

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

सिद्धन्तोन्नहीनी सभा तिरुपति " को वर्ष 1990-1991 से 1992-1993 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

( i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आन के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं.: 70/2004/फा.सं. 197 /171 /2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई. पी. एस . बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 9thMarch, 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

S.O. 709.- In exercise of the powers conferredby the Sub - clause (v) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sriman Madhwa Sidhantonnahini Sabha , Tirupati " for the purpose of the said Sub - clausė forthe assessment years 1990-1991 to 1992-1993 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to - the objects for which it is established ;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub-section (5) of Section 11 ;

826G1/04-2

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income beforethe Income -tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 70/2004/F.No.197/171 /2003 -ITA-I] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का.आ. 710. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड (v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " श्रीमान माधव सिद्धन्तोन्नहीनीसभा तिरुपति " को वर्ष 1993-1994 से 1995-1996 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(i) कर-निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदिकिसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ.त.था अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखां पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 71/ 2004/फा.सं. 197/171/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव 1282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

New Delhi , the 9th March, 2004

(INCOME - TAX)

S.O. 710. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -clause (v) ofClause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct , 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sriman Madhwa Sidhantonnahini Sabha, Tirupati " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessmen : years 1993-1994 to 1995-1996 subjectto the following conditions, namely :-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5 ) of Section 11;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income - tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 71 /2004/F.No . 197/ 171 /2003 -ITA-I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का.आ. 711. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग ) के उपखंड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " श्रीमान माधव सिद्धन्तोन्नहीनी सभा तिरुपति " को वर्ष 1996-1997 से 1998-1999 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्: -

(i) कर - निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदिकिसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार बंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाल धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 72/2004/फा.सं. 197/171/2003- आई.टी.ए.- I ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th March , 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

S.O. 711. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -clause (v) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sriman Madhwa Sidhantonnahini Sabha, Tirupati " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1996-1997 to 1998-1999 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5 ) of Section 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and Separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7; 1926

(iv) the assessee will file its return of income before the Income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 72/2004/F.No.197/171 /2003/ITA - I ] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च , 2004 (आयकर)

का. आ. 712.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " श्रीमान माधव सिद्धन्तोन्नहीनी सभा तिरुपति " को वर्ष 1999-2000 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i) कर - निर्धारित अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापनाकी गई है ;

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधिके दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहींहोगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिएप्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 73/2004/फा.सं. 197/ 171/2003- आ. टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई . पी. एस. बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव

1283 New Delhi , the 9th March, 2004 (INCOME - TAX)

S. O. 712.- In exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub - clause (v) of clause (23C ) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sriman Madhwa Sidhantonnahini Sabha, Tirupati " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1999-2000 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not investor deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub -section (5 ) of section 11 :

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , únless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee arid separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 73 /2004/F.No.1471 /2003/ ITA - 1 ] 1.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च , 2004 (आयंकर )

का. आ. 713.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( V ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा " श्रीमान माधव सिद्धन्तोन्नहीनी सभा तिरुपति" को वर्ष 2000-2001 से 2002-2003 तकके लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप - खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

( i ) कर - निर्धारित अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

(ii ) कर-निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों क किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में 1284

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 74/2004/F.No.197/ 171 /2003/TTA-I ] विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलंग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

का. आ. 714.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43). की धारा 80 की छ की उपधारा ( 2 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा " श्री देवराजस्वामी टेम्पल , कांचीपुरम, तमिलनाडुः" को सम्पूर्ण तमिलनाडु राज्य तथा सम्पूर्ण भारत में भी एक प्रसिद्ध सार्वजनिक पूजा स्थल के रूप में उक्त घारा के प्रयोजनार्थ विनिर्दिष्ट करती है ।

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 74/ 2004/फा.सं. 197/171/2003 - आई.टी.ए.- I ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

यह अधिसूचना रु . 71,85,250/- ( इक्हत्तर लाख पच्चासी हजार दो सौ पचास रुपये मात्र ) की सीमा तक के देवराज टेम्पल, कांचीपुरम के पूर्वी गोपुरम के मरम्मत / जीर्णोद्धार कार्य के लिए ही वैध होंगी तथा उक्त राशिको वसूल लिए जाने अथवा 31-3-2005, जो भी पहले हो, के उपरान्त प्रभावी नहीं होगी ।

New Delhi , the 9th March, 2004

[अधिसूचना सं . 93/2004/फा.सं. 176/23/2001- आयकर नि.- I ] (INCOME - TAX)

देवी शरण सिंह , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 713. In exercise of the powers conferredby the Sub - clause (v ) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sriman Madhwa Sidhantonnahini Sabha , Tirupati" for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 2000-2001 to 2002-2003 subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

S. O. 714.- In exercise of the powers conferred by the clause (b ) of Sub- section (2) of Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Govemment hereby specifies the " Sri Devarajaswamy Temple , Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu " to be a place of public worship of renown throughout the State of Tamil Nadu and also throughout India for the purpose of the said Section.

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section ( 5 ) of section 11:

The notification will be valid only for the repair/ renovation work of the Eastern Gopuram of Sri Devrajaswamy Temple , Kancheepuram to the extent of Rs . 71,85,250/- (Rupees Seventy one lakhs eighty five thousand two hundred fifty only) and will cease to be effective after the said amount has been collected or 31-3-2005 , whichever is earlier .

[Notification No. 93/2004/ F.No. 176/23/2001 - ITA- 1 ]

DEVI SHARAN SINGH , Under Secy.

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act , 1961 ;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च , 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 715.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड (23 -ग) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " दि बार काउंसिल ऑफ इंडिया, नई दिल्ली" को वर्ष 1997-1998 से 1999-2000 के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i) कर-निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर-निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेंगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर- निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पतियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 83/2004/फा.सं. 197/180/2003- आई.टी.ए.- I ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 715.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "The Bar Council of India, New Delhi" for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 1997-1998 to 1999-2000 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

1285 (1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, fumiture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise thanin any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of Section 11;

(in) this notification will not apply in relation to any incomebeing profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income beforethe income- tax authority in accordancewith the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[NotificationNo.83/2004/F.No.197/ 180/2003/ITA-I] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च , 2004 (आयकर )

का. आ. 716.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 -ग) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " काउंसिल फार लेदर एक्सपोटर्स, चेन्नै " को वर्ष 2001-2002 से 2003-2004 तकके लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

( ii ) कर-निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदिकिसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

1286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि. ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 84/2004/फा.सं. 197/173/2003- आई.टी.ए.- I. ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 716. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iv ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Council for Leather Exports , Chennai " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5) of Section 11;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 84/2004/F.No.197/ 173/2003 /ITA-I ]

1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 717.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " श्री अहोबिला मठ संस्कृत विद्या अभिवर्धिनी सभा चेन्नै " को वर्ष 1998-1999 से 2000-2001 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों; '

(iv) कर- निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 85/2004/फा.सं . 197/102/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई. पी . एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 11th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 717. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -clause( iv) of clause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Sri Ahobila Math Samskrita Vidya Abhivardhini Sabha , Chennai " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2000-2001 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारंत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

1287 (i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established ;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5) of Section 11;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पतियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

[ अधिसूचना सं. 86/2004/फा.सं. 197/ 174/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 11thMarch, 2004 (iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961;

(INCOME -TAX)

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 85/2004/F . No.197/ 102/2003 - ITA- I ] 1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

S. Q. 718. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (iv) of clause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifles the " The Indo - Japan Centre , Chennai " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2000-2001 subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(आयकर)

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

का. आ. 718. आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " द इण्डो-जापान सैन्टर, चेन्नै" को वर्ष 1998-1999 से 2000-2001 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of Section 11;

(i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income -tax Act . 1961 ;

1288

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004 /CHAITRA 7 , 1926

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[NotificationNo. 86/2004/F. No. 197/ 174/2003/TTA-I ]

I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर )

का. आ. 719.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " भारतीय आदिम जाति सेवक संघ, नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक केलिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्: -

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहींहो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

[अधिसूचना सं. 87/2004/फा.सं. 197/6/2004- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई . पी. एस. बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 719. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (iv ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Government hereby notifies the " Bhartiya Adim Jati Sewak Sangh , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5) of Section 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee ånd separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income -tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation withsimilar objectives .

[Notification No. 87/2004 /F.No.197/6/2004/TTA-I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004 (आयकर)

का. आ. 720. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " आन्ध्र प्रदेश स्टेट सीड सर्टिफिकेशन एजेंसी, हैदराबाद " को वर्ष 1992-1993 से 1994- 1995 तकके लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

( ii ) कर-निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधिके दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदिकिसी अन्य वस्तुआदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

( iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उ‌द्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) बिघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उ‌द्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 88/2004/फा.सं. 197/188/2003 - आई.टी.ए.- I. ] आई . पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 720. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( iv ) of clause ( 23C ) of section 10 of the Income-taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency, Hyderabad" for the purpose ofthe said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1992-1993 to 1994-1995 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established ;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of section 11 ;

826 G1/04-3

1289

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 88/2004/F.No.197/ 188/2003/ITA-1] I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च , 2004 (आयकर)

का. आ. 721.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " तमिलनाडु ट्रेड प्रोमोशन ऑर्गनाइजेशन, चेन्नै " को वर्ष 2001-2002 से 2003-2004 तकके लिएनिम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदिकिसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv) कर निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

1290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[अधिसूचना सं. 89/2004/फा.सं . 197/161/2003 - आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई. पी. एस. विन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 721. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-clause (iv) of clause (23C) ofsection 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Tamil Nadu Trade Promotion Organisation, Chennai" for the purpose of the said Sub -clause for the assessment years 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 subject to the following conditions , namely :---

(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5 ) of section 11 ;

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income -tax Act , 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a chartitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 89/2004/F . No. 197/161/2003 /ITA- I ]

I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 722. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " मराठा मंदिर, मुम्बई " को वर्ष 1999-2000 से 2001-2002 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्:-

( i) कर- निर्धारित अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

کی (ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार ठक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहींहो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 90/2004/फा.सं. 197/ 175/2003- आई.टी.ए. - 1 ]

आई. पी . एस. बिन्द्रा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

(INCOME - TAX)

S. O. 722.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -clause (iv) ofclause (23C) of section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Maratha Mandir , Mumbai " for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub -section (5) of Section 11;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961;

[अधिसूचना सं. 92/2004/फा.सं. 197/189/2003 - आई.टी.ए.Ⅰ ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[NotificationNo. 90/2004/F.No . 197/175/2003 -ITA-I]

I.P.S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

S. O. 723. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - clause (iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency, Hyderabad" for the purpose ofthe said sub -clause for the assessment years 1995-1996 to 1997-1998 subject tothe following conditions , namely :-

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर )

(i) the assesseę will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

का. आ. 723.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 - ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " आन्ध्र प्रदेश स्टेट सीड सर्टिफिकेशन एजेंसी, हैदराबाद " को वर्ष 1995-1996 से 1997-1998 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है , अर्थात्: -

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub- section ( 5 ) of Section 11;

(i) कर- निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income -tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधिके दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;

[Notification No. 92/2004/F.No . 197/ 189/2003/ITA- I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि 1292

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 724.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार आयकर नियमावली , 1962के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 (23 - छ ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-2005 से नीचे पैरा ( 3 ) में उल्लिखित उद्यम/उपक्रम को अनुमोदित करती है । 2. यह अनुमोदन इस शर्त के अधीन है कि:-

( i) उद्यम/उपक्रम आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 (23छ ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप होगा और उनका अनुपालन करेगा;

( ii ) केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि उद्यम/उपक्रम:-

(क) आयकर नियमवाली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के स्पष्टीकरण ( ख ) में यथा परिभाषित पात्र कारोबार को जारी रखना बंद कर देता है ; और (ख ) खाता- बहियों का रख - रखाव नहीं करता है तथा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप नियम ( 7 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित किसी लेखाकर द्वारा ऐसे खातों की लेखा परीक्षा नहीं कराता है ; अथवा

(ग) आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप नियम ( 7 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करता है ।

3. अनुमोदित उद्यम/उपक्रम है:-

हारंगी लेफ्ट बैंक केनाल निकट कुशालनगर, कोडागू जिला , कर्नाटक स्थित १ मेगावाट मिनि हाइड्रो इलैक्ट्रिक प्रोजेक्ट के लिए मैसर्स एनर्जी डवलपमेंट कम्पनी लिमिटेड, पंजीकृत कार्यालय गांव हुलुगंडा, तालुका सोमवरपेट , जिला कोडागू, कर्नाटक-571233 और कार्पोरेट आफिस- आजिमगंज हाउस , 7, केमैक स्ट्रीट, प्रथम तल , कोलकाता-- 7000171

[अधिसूचना सं. 82/2004/फ्र.सं. 205/68/2000- आयकरनि. II/खंड- I ]

संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि. -II ) New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004

S. O. 724. It is notified for general information that the enterprise/undertaking, listed at para (3 ) below has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of Section 10 (23G ) of the Income -tax Act , 1961 , read withrule 2E of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 with effect from the Asstt. Year2004-2005 .

2. The approval is subject to the conditions that ( 1) the enterprise/ undertaking will conform to and comply with the provisions of Section 10 ( 23G)

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ofthe Income-tax Act , 1961 , read with rule 2E ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962;

(ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval if the enterprise /undertaking:-

(a) ceases to carry on the eligible business as defined in Explanation (b ) of Rule 2E of I.T. Rules , 1962 ; or

(b) fails to maintain books of account and get such accounts audited by an accountant as required by sub - rule ( 6) of Rule 2E of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 ; or

3. The enterprise/ undertaking approved is M/ s. Energy Development Company Ltd. Regd. Office Village Hulugunda , Taluka Somwarpet , Distt . Kodagu , Karnataka- 571233 and Corporate Office at Azimganj House, 7, Camac Street, Ist Floor, Kolkata-700017 for 9 MW Mini Hydro Electric Project at Harangi Left Bank Canal near Kushalnagar , Kodagu Distt, Karnataka.

[Notification No. 82/2004/ F. No. 205/68/2000-ITA-II (Vol. I)] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITА- ІІ) नई दिल्ली , 11 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 725.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 (23-छ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2002-2003 से नीचे पैरा ( 3 ) में उल्लिखित उद्यम/उपक्रम को अनुमोदित करती है । 2. यह अनुमोदन इस शर्त के अधीन है कि:-

( i) उद्यम/उपक्रम आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10(23 छ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप होगा और उनका अनुपालन करेगा;

( ii ) केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि उद्यम/उपक्रम : -

(क) आयकर नियमवाली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के स्पष्टीकरण ( ख ) में यथा परिभाषित पात्र कारोबार को जारी रखना बंद कर देता है ; और (ख) खाता- बहियों का रख - रखाव नहीं करता है तथा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप नियम ( 7 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित किसी लेखाकर द्वारा ऐसे खातों की लेखा परीक्षा नहीं कराता है ; अथवा [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1293

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च , 2004 (ग) आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उप नियम (7 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करता है ।

3. अनुमोदित उद्यम/उपक्रम है:-

का. आ. 726.-अधिसूचना सं. 11377 दिनांक 24-5-2000 में, क्रम सं. 1 पर " मैसर्स ऐसपी रिसर्च एण्ड डेवलपमेंट फाऊंडेशन, पो. बॉक्स सं. 7602, आदर्श हाउजिंग सोसायटी, क्रास रोड सं. 1 , मलाड़ (प. ) , मुम्बई -400064 " के रूप में उल्लिखित आवेदक का नाम निम्नतया पढ़ा जाए:-

मैसर्स एस्सार पावर लिमिटेड, 14 , एस्सार हाउस, 11 , के. के. मार्ग , महालक्ष्मी , मुम्बई -400034 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को हजीरा , गुजरात स्थित उनके 515 मेगा वाट कम्बाईंड साइकिल पावर प्लांट के लिए । (फा. सं . 205/12/98- आ.क्र. नि.- II ) ( खण्ड-1 )

[अधिसूचना सं. 94/2004/फ्र.सं. 205/ 12/1998-आयकरनि. II/खंड- I ]

मैसर्स ऐसपी एग्रीकल्चरल रिसर्च एण्ड डेवलपमेंट फाउंडेशन, पो. बॉक्स नं. 7602 , आदर्श हाउजिंग सोसायटी, क्रास रोड सं. 1 , मलाड ( प. ) , मुम्बई -400064 संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.-II )

NewDelhi , the 11th March , 2004

[अधिसूचना सं. 95/2004/ फां. सं. 203/77/2000-आ.क.नि.- II ] संगीता गुप्ता, निदेशक ( आयकर नि.-II ) CORRIGENDUM NewDelhi , the 11th March, 2004 S. O. 725. It is notified for general information that the enterprise/ undertaking, listed at para ( 3 ) below has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of Section 10 (23G) of the Income-tax Act , 1961 , read with rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 with effect from the Asstt. Year 2002-2003 ,

2. The approval is subject to the conditions that :-

S.O. 726. InNotification No. 11377 dated24-5-2000, the name of the applicant indicated at Sr. No. 1 as "M/s. AspeeResearch & Development Foundation, P. O. Box No. 7602, Adarsh Housing Society, Cross Road No. 1 Malad ( W) , Mumbai -400064 " may be read as under:-

M/ s. Aspee Agricultural Research & Development Foundation,

P.O. Box No. 7602 , Adarsh Housing Society, (i) the enterprise/undertaking will conform to and comply with the provisions of Section 10(23G) of the Income-tax Act , 1961 , read with rule 2E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 ;

( ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval if the enterprise/undertaking:-

( a) ceases to carry on the eligible business as defined in Explanation (b) to Rule 2E of I.T. Rules , 1962 ; or

CrossRoad No. Malad (W) , Mumbai -400064 [Notification No. 95/2004/F. No. 203/77/2000 -ITA- II ] SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (ITA- II) नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2004 (आयकर)

(b) fails to maintain books of account and get such accounts audited by an accountant as required by Sub - rule (6 ) of Rule 2E of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 ; or

का. आ. 727 .-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " मैसूर रिसेटलमेंट एण्ड डवलपमैंट एजेन्सी , बंगलौर " को वर्ष 2003-2004 से 2005-2006 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्:-

3. The enterprise/ undertaking approved is:

( i ) कर निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा , जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ,

M/s. Essar Power Ltd. 14 , Essar House , 11 , K.Κ. Marg . Mahalaxmi , Mumbai -400034 ( Maharashtra) for their 515 MW Combined Cycle Power Palant at Hazira, Gujarat . (F. No. 205/ 12/98 - ITA- II) (Vol . 1 ).

[Notification No. 94/2004 /F, No. 205/ 12/ 1998-(ITA - II) (Vol - 1)]

SANGEETA GUPTA, Director (IТА- II)

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अंथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा 1294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004 /CHAITRA 7, 1926

तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर-जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक ) अंशदान से भिन्न का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा,

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिएप्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों,

( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ,

(v ) विघटन के स्थिति में अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी ।

[ अधिसूचना सं . 96 /2004/फा. सं . 197/26/2004- आयकर नि.-[ ]

आई. पी . एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th March, 2004

(INCOME- TAX)

S. O. 727. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub -clause ( iv ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Mysore Resettlement and Development Agency , Bangalore " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment years 2003-2004 to 2005-2006 subject to the following conditions , namely: -

(i ) the assessee will apply its income or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

( ii ) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modés specified in Sub- section ( 5) of Section 11;

( iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business:

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income - tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 96/2004/F. No. 197/26/2004 - ITA - I ]

1.P. S. BINDRA , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च , 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 728.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " मिडिया लैब एशिया, मुम्बई " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्: - (i ) कर- निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा, जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ,

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा,

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों,

(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ,

[अधिसूचना सं. 97/2004/फा. सं . 197/10/ 2004- आयकर नि. - 1 ]

आई. पी . एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th March , 2004

(INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 728 -In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub - clause ( iv) of clause ( 23C ) of Section 10 of the Income -taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Media Lab Asia , Mumbai " for the [ भाग. II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5 ) of Section 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income-tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 97/2004/F. No. 197 / 10/2004-ITA- I ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 729.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " आन्ध्र प्रदेश स्टेट सीड सर्टिफिकेशन एजेंसी , हैदाराबाद " को वर्ष 1989-1990 से 1991-1992 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्:-

( i ) कर - निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा , जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है,

(ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा,

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1295 ( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों,

( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ,

(v) विघटन के स्थिति में अतिरिक्त राशियों और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं . 98/2004/फा. सं. 197/187/2003- आयकर नि. -1 ] आई. पी . एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th March, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

S. O. 729. In exercise ofpowers conferred by the Sub - clause ( iv ) of Clause (23C ) of Section 10 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency , Hyderabad" for the purpose of the said Sub - clause for the assessment years 1989-1990 to 1991-1992 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly filė its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income-tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 98/2004/F . No. 197/ 187/ 2003 -ITA- I ]

1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

1296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 730.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " वेस्ट जोन कल्चरल सैंटर, उदयपुर ( राजस्थान ) " को वर्ष 2001-2002 से 2003- 2004 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर--निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा , जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ,

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फनींचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा ,

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहींहोगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक क़ि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों,

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा,

[अधिसूचना सं. 100/2004/फा. सं. 197/181/2003- आयकर नि. -1 ] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th March , 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 730. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub -clause ( iv) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " West Zone Cultural Centre , Udaipur (Rajasthan) " for the purpose of the said Sub- clause for the assessment years 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] (ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of Section 11 ;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income- tax Act , 1961;

(v) that in the event ofdissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[NotificationNo. 100/2004/F . No. 197/ 181/2003 - ITA-I ] I. P. S. BINDRA , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2004 (आयकर)

का. आ. 731- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुएं केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " इण्टरनेशनल कमीशन आन इरिगेशन एण्डड्रेनेज , नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्: -

(i) कर-निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा, जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है,

(ii ) कर - निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर-जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा,

(iii ) यह आदेश किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिएप्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग सेलेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों, 1297 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्: -

( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा,

(i) कर- निर्धारिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा, जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है,

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 101/2004/फा. सं. 197/200/2003-आयकर नि. -1] आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2004

(INCOME TAX)

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा,

S. O. 731. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub -clause ( iv ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों, (1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established ;

(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा,

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में अतिरिक्त राशियों और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी । (ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5) of Section 11 ;

[अधिसूचना सं. 102/2004/फर. सं. 197/89/2002-आयकर नि. -1 ] आई. पी. एस . बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव, New Delhi, the 12th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX) (iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

S. O. 732. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub -clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "Aga Khan Rural Support Programme (India) , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2000-2001 to 2002-2003 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation withsimilar objectives.

[NotificationNo. 101 /2004/F. No. 197/200/ 2003 - ITA- I]

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established:

नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2004

1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

(आयकर)

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5) of Section 11;

का. आ. 732.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा " आगा खाँ रुरल सर्पोट प्रोग्राम ( इंडिया ) , नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2000-2001 से 2002-2003 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित

826G1 /04-4 1298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

( iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any incomebeing profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

( iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ;

(V ) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 102/2004/F. No. 197/89/2002- ITA- I]

1. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 12 मार्च, 2004

(आयकर)

का. आ. 733.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखंड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा " इंस्टीट्यूट फॉर फाइनेंसियल मैनेजमेंट एण्ड रिसर्च , चेन्नई " को वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के कर निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर- निर्धािरिती उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा उसकी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा, जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है,

( ii ) कर- निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर अथवा किसी अन्य वस्तु आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा ,

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों,

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ,

( v ) विघटन की स्थिति में अतिरिक्त राशियों और परिसम्पत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी । [अधिसूचना सं. 103/2004/फा. सं. 197/22/2004-आयकर नि. - 1 ]

आई. पी. एस. बिन्द्रा, अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 12th March, 2004 (INCOME -TAX)

S. O. 733. In exercise of powers conferred by the Sub -clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), the Central Government hereby notifies the " Institute of Financial Management and Research, Chennai " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established ;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for anyperiod during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section (5 ) of Section 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any incomebeing profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 103/2004/F. No. 197/22/2004 - ITA- 1 ] I. P. S. BINDRA, Under Secy .

( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग )

नईदिल्ली, 15 मार्च , 2004.

का. आ. 734.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड १ के उपखंड ( ii ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री ए. एन . बालासुब्रमणियन , विशेष सहायक, केनरा बैंक को 15-3-2004 से 31-5-2006 तक अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक या केनरा बैंक के कर्मकार कर्मचारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक या अगले आदेशों तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, केनरा बैंक के निदेशक बोर्ड में कर्मकार कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं . 15/6/2003- आई.आर.

ए. थामस, अवर सचिव 1299 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(Department of EconomicAffairs)

नई दिल्ली, 15 मार्च, 2004 (BANKING DIVISION) NewDelhi , the 15th March, 2004

का. आ. 736.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण-उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970 के खंड 9 के उपखंड ( 2 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री देवीदास रामचन्द्र तुलजापुरकर, विशेष सहायक, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र को 15-3-2004 से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए और उसके बाद उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक या बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के कर्मकार कर्मचारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक या अगले आदेशों तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के निदेशक बोर्ड में कर्मकार कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप मेंनियुक्त करती है , बशर्ते कि वे लगातार छह वर्ष से अधिक की अवधि के लिये पदभार ग्रहण नहीं करेंगे ।

S. O. 734. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause ( e) of Sub-section (3 ) of section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970 read with Sub-section ( 2) of Clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri A.N. Balasubramanian, Special Asstt. , Canara Bank as Workman Employee Director on the Board of Directors of Canara Bank with effect from 15-3-2004 to 31-5-2006 i.e. the date of his superannuation or till he ceases to be a workmen employee of Canara Bank or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[फा. सं . 15/11/2003-आई.आर.

[F. No. 15/6/2003 - IR] A. THOMAS, Under Secy.

ए. थामस, अवर सचिव नईदिल्ली, 15 मार्च, 2004

NewDelhi , the 15th March, 2004 का. आ. 735.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1980 के खंड 9 के उपखंड ( 2 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों काअर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा श्री हनुमंत राव, लिपिक, कारपोरेशन बैंक को 15-3-2004 से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए और उसके बाद उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक या कारपोरेशन बैंक के कर्मकार कर्मचारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक या अगले आदेशों तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, कारपोरेशन बैंक के निदेशक बोर्ड में कर्मकार कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है , बशर्ते कि वे लगातार छह वर्ष से अधिक की अवधि के लिये पदभार ग्रहण नहीं करेंगे ।

S. O. 736. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( e) of Sub- section (3 ) of section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970 read with Sub- section (2 ) of Clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970 , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar, Special Asstt. , Bank of Maharashtra as a Workman Employee Director on the Board ofDirectors of Bank of Maharashtra for a period of three years with effect from 15-3-2004 and thereafter until his successor is appointed or till he ceases tobe a workmen employee of Bank of Maharashtra or until further orders , whichever is earliest provided that he shall not hold office continuously for a period exceeding six years.

[फा. सं . 15/ 10/2003-आई.आर. ]

[F. No. 15/ 11 /2003 - IR]

ए. थामस, अवर सचिव

A. THOMAS, Under Secy.

New Delhi , the 15th March, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 737.- राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 ( 1981 का 61 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( छ ) के साथ पठित उसकी उपधारा ( 2 ) और धारो 8 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से एतद्वारा डा० वाई. एस. पी. थोरेट, वर्तमान कार्यापालक निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से और उनकी आयु 60 वर्ष हो जाने तक अर्थात् 30-11-2007 तक की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश होने तक, इनमें से जो भी सबसे पहले हो , राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक में 24050-650-26000 रुपए के वेतमान में प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

S. O. 735. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( e) of Sub- section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1980 read with Sub-section (2) of Clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government hereby appoints Ch . Hanumantha Rao, Clerk , Corporation Bank as a Workman Employee Director on the Board ofDirectors ofCorporation Bank for a period of three years with effect from 15-3-2004 and thereafter until his successor is appointed or till he ceases to be a workmen employee of CorporationBank or until further orders , whichever is earlier provided that he shall not hold office continuously for a period exceeding six years .

[सं. एफ. 9 /20/2002-बी.ओ.आई . ] [F. No.15/10/2003 - IR]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव A. THOMAS, Under Secy.

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

1300

New Delhi , the 18th March, 2004

New Delhi , the 16th March, 2004

S. O. 737. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (g) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 read with Sub- section (2) thereof and clause (a) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 8 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act , 1981 (61 of 1981 ) , the Central Government, in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Dr. Y.S.P. Thorat, presently Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India as the Managing Director, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) in the pay scale of Rs . 24050-650-26000/-with effect from the date of his taking charge of the post and till he attains the age of 60 years i. e. upto 30-11-2007 or until further orders , whichever event occurs the earliest .

S. O. 739. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b ) of Sub - section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Amitabh Verma, IAS (BH : 82) , Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance , Department of Economic Affairs, Banking Division, New Delhi as a Director on the Board of Directors of Bank of India with immediate effect and until further orders or until he ceases to be an officer of Ministry of Finance , whichever is earlier vice Shri Shekhar Agarwal.

[F. No. 9/20/2002-Β.Ο.Ι. ]

[F. No. 9/11 /2004-Β.Ο.Ι . ( II) ] RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy .

RAMESH CHAND , Under Secу .

नई दिल्ली, 17 मार्च, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 738.- राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक अधिनियम, 1987 (1987 का 53 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा 1 के खण्ड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा शहरी रोजगार एवं गरीबी उन्मूलन विभाग , नई दिल्ली में सचिव, श्री ए. एन. तिवारी को तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगले आदेश तक श्री एस. एस. चट्टोपाध्याय के स्थान पर राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं. एफ. 7/15/2000- बी.ओ.आई. ] रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव

का. आ. 740.- राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक अधिनियम , 1987 (1987 का 53 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा वित्त मंत्रालय, आर्थिक कार्य विभाग, बैंकिंग प्रभाग , नई दिल्ली में संयुक्त सचिव , श्री अमिताभ वर्मा, आईएएस ( बिहार 82 ) को तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगले आदेशों तक अथवा वित्त मंत्रालय में उनके अधिकारी न रहने पर, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , श्री शेखर अग्रवाल के स्थान पर राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्त करती है।

New Delhi , the 17th March , 2004

[ सं. एफ. 9/ 11/2004- बी.ओ.आई. - 1 ( 1 ) ]

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 18th March, 2004

S. O. 738. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( c ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the National Housing Bank Act . 1987 (53 of 1987), the Central Government , hereby appoints Shri A.N. Tiwari , Secretary, Department of Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation , New Delhi as a director on the Board of Directors of National Housing Bank with immediate effect and until further orders in place of Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay.

[F. No.7/ 15/2000 -Β.Ο.Ι . ]

RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2004

S. O. 740. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( e) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the National Housing Bank Act , 1987 (53 of 1987 ) , the Central Govemment, hereby appoints Shri Amitabh Verma, IAS (BH:82), Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance , Department of Economic Affairs , Banking Division , New Delhi as a Director on the Board of Directors of National Housing Bank with immediate effect and until further orders or until he ceases tobe an officer of Ministry of Finance, whichever isearlier inplace of Shri Shekhar Agarwal .

[F. No. 9/ 11 /2004-Β.Ο.Ι . (1) ] RAMESH CHAND , Under Secу.

वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय (वाणिज्य विभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 11मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 739.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970 के खण्ड 3 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा श्री अमिताभ वर्मा , आईएएस ( बिहार : 82) , संयुक्त सचिव , वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , बैंकिंग प्रभाग, नई दिल्ली को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक अथवा वित्त मंत्रालय में उनके अधिकारी न रहने पर, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, श्री शेखर अग्रवाल के स्थान पर बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्त करती है ।

[ सं. एफ. 9 / 11 /2004- बी.ओ.आई. ( II ) ]

का. आ. 741 केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1964 के नियम 12 के उपनियम ( 2 ) के साथ पठित निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव 1301

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(1963का 22 ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स थैराप्युटिक्स कैमिकल रिसर्च कारपोरेशन को, जो द्वार सं. 26-8-69 , सत्यानिलायम, राजा राम मोहन राय रोड, विशाखापत्तनम 530001 में अवस्थित है , वाणिज्य मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर, 1965 के साथ उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट खनिज और अयस्क, समूह I, अर्थात् लौह अयस्क का विशाखापत्तनम में निर्यात से पूर्व निरीक्षण करने के लिए अभिकरण के रूप में तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए मान्यता प्रदान करती है, अर्थात्:-

(1) मैसर्स थैराप्युटिक्स कैमिकल रिसर्ज कारपोरेशन, विशाखापत्तनम खनिज और अयस्क समूह I के निर्यात (निरीक्षण) नियम, 1965 के नियम 4 के अधीन निरीक्षण का प्रमाणपत्र देने में उनके द्वारा अनुसरित की जाने वाली निरीक्षण की पद्धति की जांच करने के लिए इस निमित्त निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा नामनिर्दिष्ट अधिकारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधाएं देगा;

(i) मैसर्स थैराप्युटिक्स कैमिकल रिसर्च कोपॅर्पोरेशन विशाखापत्तनम इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने कृत्यों के निर्वहन में निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1964 के नियम 12के उपनियम ( 1 ) के अधीन उसे समय- समय पर लिखित मेंदिए गए निदेशों से आबद्ध होगा ।

[फा. सं. 5/1/2004- ईआईएण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department of Commerce)

NewDelhi, the 11th March, 2004 S. O. 741. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963) read with sub -rule (2) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 1964, the Central Government hereby recognises for a period of three years from the date of publication ofthis notification M/ s . Therapeutics Chemical Research Corporation, located at Door No. 26-8-69 , Satyanilayam , Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road, Vishakhapatnam - 530001 , as an agency for the inspection ofMinerals and Ores , Group- I namely, Iron Ore , specified in the Schedule annexed to the Ministry of Commerce notificationnumber S.O. 3975 , dated 20th December 1965, prior to export at Vishakhapatnam, subject to the following conditions, namely :-

(1) That M/s . Therapeutics Chemical and Research Corporation, Vishakhapatnam, shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in granting the certificate of inspection under rule 4 of the Export ofMinerals and Ores Group I ( Inspection) Rules, 1965;

(ii ) That M/s . Therapeutics Chemical and Research Corporation, Vishakhapatnam in the performance of their function under this notification shall be boundby such directives as may be given to them inwriting from time under sub -rule ( 1 ) ofrule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection ) Rules , 1964;

[F. No. 5/1/2004-EI & EP]

RAJ SINGH, Director नईदिल्ली, 11मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 742.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1964 के नियम 12 के उपनियम ( 2 ) के साथ पठित निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 (1963का 22 ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एसन एण्ड कंपनी को, जो प्रथम तल, 25-8-152, मेन रोड, निकट 1 - टाउन पुलिस स्टेशन, विशाखापत्तनम- 530021 में अवस्थित है , वाणिज्य मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर, 1965 के साथ उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट खनिज और अयस्क, समूह 1, अर्थात्लौह अयस्क और मैंगनीज अयस्क्र (मैंगनीज डायाक्साइड को छोड़कर ) को विशाखापत्तनम में निर्यात से पूर्व निरीक्षण करने के लिए अभिकरण के रूप में तीन वर्ष की अवधिके लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए मान्यता प्रदान करती है, अर्थात्:-

(1 ) मैसर्स एसन एण्ड कंपनी, विशाखापत्तनम खनिज और अयस्क समूह 1 के निर्यात ( निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1965 के नियम 4के अधीन निरीक्षण का प्रमाणपत्र देने में उनके द्वारा अनुसरित की जानें वाली निरीक्षण की पद्धति की जांच करने के लिए इस निमित्त निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा नामनिर्दिष्ट अधिकारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधाएं देगा;

(ii) मैसर्स एसन एण्ड कंपनी, विशाखापत्तनम इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने कृत्यों के निर्वहन में निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1964 के नियम 12 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के अधीन उसे समय - समय पर लिखित में दिए गए निदेशों से आबद्ध होगा ।

[फा. सं. 5/2/2004-ईआईएण्ड ईपी ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक New Delhi , the 11th March, 2004 S. O. 742. In exercise ofpowers conferredby Sub- section( 1) of Section 7 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) read with sub -rule ( 2) of rule 12 ofthe Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Rules, 1964 , the Central Government hereby recognises for a period of three years from the date of publication of this notification , M/ s . Essen & Co. , located at 1st Floor, 25-8- 152, Main Road , Near 1 - Town police Station , Vishakhapatanam - 530021 , as an agency for the inspection of Minerals and Ores , Group - I namely , Iron Ore , and Managnese Ore ( excluding Manganese dioxide ) , specified in the Schedule annexed to the Ministry of Commerce 1302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

NotificationNumber S.O. 3975, dated 20th December 1965 , prior to export at Vishakhapatnam, subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) ThatM/s . Essen & Co. , Vishakhapatnam, shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in granting the certificate of inspection under rule 4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores Group I (Inspection) Rules , 1965 ;

(ii) That M/ s . Essen & Co. , Vishakhapatnam in the performance of their function under this notification shall be bound by such directives as may be given to them in writing from time under sub -rule ( 1) ofrule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 1964;

[F. No.5/2/2004 -ΕΙ & ΕΡ] RAJ SINGH, Director संचार और सूचना प्रोद्यौगिकी मंत्रालय (दूरसंचारविभाग )

( राजभाषाअनुभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 15 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 743.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनोंके लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10 (4) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को , जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है ।

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लि. उत्तरांचल परिमण्डल, देहरादून

उपमण्डल अधिकारी दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, बडकोट ( उत्तरकाशी )

[सं. ई -11016/1/2004- रा.भा. ]

हरीश चन्द्र जयोल, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Telecommunications) (OFFICIAL LANGUAGE SECTION) New Delhi, the 15th March, 2004 S.O 743-In pursuance ofRule 10( 4) of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of the Union) rules. 1976 (as amended- 1987 ), the Central Government hereby notifies the following Office under the administrative contorl ofMinistry of Communications and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications where of more than 80% of staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Chief General Manager Telecom , BSNL , Uttaranchal Circle, Dehradune

Kashi) SubDivisional Officer Telecom, BSNL, Barkot (Uttar

[No. E - 11016 /1 /2004 -O.L . ] Harish Chandra Jayal , Jt . Secy .

रेल मंत्रालय (रेलवे बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी , 2004

का.आ. 744.-रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड ) राजभाषा 1976 ( संघ केशासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 2 ) और (4 ) के अनुसरण में दक्षिण - मध्य रेलवे के गुंतकल मंडल के निम्नलिखित रेल कार्यालयों को , जहां 80 % से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है:-

दक्षिण- मध्य रेलवे ( गुंतकल मंडल )

1. सी.डी.ओ. कार्यालय/तिरूपति

2. चिकित्सा अधीक्षक कार्यालय/ धर्मवरम

3. मंडल चिकित्सा अधिकारी कार्यालय/पाकाला 4. सहायक मंडल इंजीनियर कार्यालय/पाकाला

5. मंडल चिकित्सा अधिकारी कार्यालय/द्रोणाचलम 6. मंडल चिकित्सा अधिकारी कार्यालय/मदनपल्ली 7. सहायक सुरक्षा अधिकारी कार्यालय/रेणिगुंटा

[सं. हिंदी-2003 /रा.भा. - 1/12/3 ] वी.एन. माथुर, सचिव MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

(RAILWAY BOARD)

New Delhi , the 26th February, 2004 S.O. 744. Ministry of Railways ( Railway Board ), in pursuance of Sub Rule ( 2) and ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the official purposes of the Union) hereby, notifiy the following Offices of Guntkal division of South - Central Railway, where 80 % or more Officers/Employees have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :-

South- Central Railway (Guntkal Division) 1. C.D.O. Office/Tirupati

2. Medical Supdt. Office/.Dharmavaram

3. Divisional Medical Officer's /Pakala

4. Assistant Divisional Engineer's Office /Pakala 5. Divisional Medical Officer's Office/Dronachellam 6. Divisional Medical Officer's Office/Madanpalle 7. Assistant Security Officer's Office/Renigunta

[No.Hindi -2003/OL - 1/ 12/3 ] V. N. MATHUR, Secy.

ド [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1303

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

(भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली, 17 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 745.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम सं.

लाइसेंस संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 1. 9286695 2001/06

गुजरात अम्बुजा सीमेंट लि. , समीप गुरूनानक देव थर्मल प्लांट, मालआउट रोड, भटिंडा 2. 9286796 2001/06

गुजरात अम्बुजा सीमेंट लि. , समीप गुरूनानक देव थर्मल प्लांट , मालआउट रोड, भटिंडा 3. 9286897 2001/06

फाइनस्विचगियर्स, 39-40 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फगवाड़ा-144401 4. 9286901 2001/06

बटाला-143505 धर्म इंजीनियरिंग कं. , जी.टी. रोड,

5. 9287091 2001/06

ज्योति प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, फेस 1 , यमुना नगर-135001 6. 9287192 2001 : 06

गोयल केमीकल्स, 188 , नागरौर गोण्डा रोड़, बहरोच

7. 9287293 2001/06

सुप्रीम लुम्बर्स, प्लॉट नं. 20 बी, सैक्टर 1 , परवानू जिला सोलन

8. 9287394 2001/06

मार्कफीड एग्रो केमीकल्स, 7 और 8 बी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 1 , मोहाली 9 . 9287495 2001/06

वरूण बेबरेजिज लि. , 10वाँ किमी. स्टोन आगरा दिल्ली हाइवे , गाँव दौटाना, तहसील छाता, जिला मथुरा

10 . 9287596 2001/06

कमर्शियल सेल्स कारपोरेशन , 21, पंचवटी कालोनी पिकनिक स्पॉटरोड़,

समीप नैनीताल पब्लिक लखनऊ -226006 भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

अनु. वर्ष

भामा भाग संख्या

(5)

(6)

(7) 33 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट 00269

08112

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

08828

96 विद्युत सहायक अंग- घरेलू और ऐसे ही संस्थापनों के लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

88 एस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट के दाब पाइपों के 08794 साथ प्रयुक्त अलग हो सकने वाले ढलवां लौहे के जोड़

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

02569

78 मैलाथियॉन डब्ल्यूपी

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

09356

ब्यूटाक्लोर ई सी

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

95 फसल संरक्षण उपस्कर हस्तचालित 03906 पीठ पर लादा जाने वाला संपीडन फुहारा, पिस्टन टाइप 1304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004 /CHAITRA 7, 1926

(3)

(1) (2)

(4) 11. 9287697 2001/06

मॉडर्न वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, झोटा रोड, जगाधरी 12. 9287701 2001/06

मॉडर्न वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, झोटा रोड, जगाधरी

2001/06

13. 9287802

आईसबर्ग फूडस लि. , 44वाँ किमी दिल्ली- रोहतक हाइवे, गाँव एवं पी ओ रोपड, जिला झज्जर

2001/06

9287903

14.

स्कयरमिनरल वॉटर प्रा लि. , 321 , फेस 9 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मोहाली

2001/06

15. 9288093

जुनेजा मेटल वर्क्स, गाँन्न वरियाना , कपूरथला रोड, पी.ओ. बस्ती गुजाँ, जालंधर-144 002

2001/06

16. 9288194

जय बालाजी प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , जटोला रोड़, गाँव सैदपुर, औचन्दीबॉर्डर, जिला सोनीपत

17. 9288295 2001/06

डेली एग्रो मिल्क फूडस इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 9 एएचएसआईडीसी इंड. एस्टेट, कुण्डली, जिला सोनीपत -131 028

2001/06

18. 9288396

नेस्लेइंडिया लि. , पाती कल्याना किवाना रोड़, सामल्खा-132 101

2001/06

19. 9288497

ऑसवाल इलैक्ट्रिकल्स ( पम्प्स ) 71/3 मील पत्थर, जी.टी. रोड, करनाल

2001/06

20. 9288501

अरिहन्त बेवरजिज प्रा. लि. , ई-25, यूपीएसआईडीसी साइट सी, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , गाँष अरटोनी सिकन्दरा , आगरा 21. 9288602 2001/06

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

(7) (5)

(6)

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

09890

सामान्य प्रयोजन के बॉल वाल्व

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

00325

तीन फेजीय प्रेरण मोटर

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

जे. के. बेवरेजिज,

262, कम्पूघाट आईए फैक्टरी

क़म्पाउंड, मथुरा

22. 9288703 2001/06

एशियनलक हैल्थ फूडस लि. , वीपीओ जन्मडीअली, समीप कोहरा, जिला लुधियाना

2001/06

23. 9288804

स्वरूप केमीकल्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , जी31 से 345, यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया देवा रोड़, चिन्हात लखनऊ

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

08074

मोनोक्रोटोफॉस एस एल [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 24. 9288905 2001/06

1305 (5)

(6)

(7)

14543

86 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

कसरिजा कॉटन गिंनिंग एण्ड प्रेसिंग

फेक्टरी

जलालाबाद रोड़,

मुक्तेश्वर 152026

25. 9289095 2001/06

साबास फूडस इंडिया प्रा. लि. 3-बी, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट बीरपुर बारी ब्राह्मण जम्मू 26. 9289196 2001/06

प्रीमियर इस्पात ( प्रा. ) लि. एफ4 से एफ 5 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंड. एरिया, जैनपुर कानपुर देहात 27. 9289297 2001/06 किसान दूध उद्योगलि. गाँव थिरियाक्ल पीओ धनोई हरगोबिन्दपुर रोड़, तह. बटाला जिला गुरदासपुर 28. 9289301 2001/06

खखरायन फूड प्रॉडक्टस ( प्रा. ) लि. 102इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया (यूपीएसआईडीसी) बद्दी जिला सोलन 29. 9289402 2001/06

सुप्रीम लुम्बर्स प्लॉट नं. 20 बी सेक्टर 1 , परवानू, जिला सोलन 30. 9289503 2001/06

पेप्सीको इंडिया होल्डिंग्स प्रा. ए-2, यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया साईट 2 , बाजपुर 262401 जिला यूएस नगर 31. 9289604 2001/06

बी के पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज बरनाला रोड़, रायकोट लुधियाना 141109 32. 9289705 2001/06

ऑरिएटल सेरेमिक्स एण्ड रिफ्रेटियररीइज प्रा. लि. गाँव दॉनतहसील मोहाली जिलारोपड़

33. 9289806

2001/06

फारीड एग्रो टेक इंडिया 4थाकिमी स्थान एनएच 15 कोटक पूरा रोड फरीदकोट 151203 34. 9289907 2001/06

एम्पायर एस्बेस्टॉस सी-18, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया फेस 1 मोहाली 826GI/04-5

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

01786

85 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्य विन्धापित इस्पात के सरिए और तार

मलाईयुक्त दूध पाउडर

13334 01

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

ग्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

00458

88 पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

00458

88 पूर्व दलित कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

एस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट के दाब पाइप 01592

89 [PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

1306

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

14543

2001/06

35. 929008

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

डेनसंस पॉली प्रॉडक्टस लि. जीपी 37 एचएसआईडीसी सेक्टर 18 गुड़गाँव 122001

14543

2001/06

9290181

36.

पैकेजबन्द्र पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिज़रल जल के अलावा)

जेमिनी फूड एण्ड बेवरेजिज प्रा.लि. 11/7 मील पत्थर मथुरा रोड़, फरीदाबाद

14543

2001/06

9290282

37.

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

नूकेमवाटर लि. 20/6, मथुरा रोड, फरीदाबाद

14543

2001/06

9290383

38.

पैकजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मॉर्डन बेवरेजिज मीरासाहिब ब्लॉक आर एस पुरा जम्मू

08944

क्लोरपाइरिफॉस ई सी

2001/06

9290484

39.

भारत रसायन एगारे ( प्रा. ) लि. त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब तहसील नहान जिला सिरमौर

11997

फेनवेलरेट ई सी

2001/06

9290585

40.

भारत रसायन एगारे ( प्रा. ) लि. त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब तहसील नहान जिला सिरमौर

14543

2001/06

9290686

41 .

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

क्लासिक वॉटर इंडिया प्रा. लि, प्लाट नं. 11 , सेक्टर 4 आईएमटी मानेसर गुडगाँव

13334 01

मलाई युक्त दूध पाउडर

2001/06

9290787

42.

जी. के. डेयरी एण्डमिल्क प्रॉडक्टस 196/231 सीकरी हरफाला रोड बल्लभगढ़ फरीदाबाद

03319

शल्य क्रिया हेतु ब्लेड

2001/06

9290888

43.

मगना मार्केटिंग डी-3 रोड नं. 3 , उद्योग कुंड पनकी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, साइट 1 , कानपुर

09537 03 2001/06

9290989

44.

विद्युत संस्थापन के लिए कंडयूट भाग 3 कंडयूट विद्युतरोधक सामग्री के लिए दृढ सांद्र कंडयूट

अम्बा प्लास्टिक इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव रामपुरा राम नगर रोड काशीपुर जिला यूएस नगर

14543

2001/06

45. 9291082

पैकेज़बन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

श्रीसाई एक्वामिनरल्स 20/6, डीएलएफ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया फेस 1 , फरीदाबाद 121003

जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाईड्रेट कृषि ग्रेड 08249

2001/06

9291183

46.

डीके एक्सपोर्टस 24, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, फेस 1 , यमुना नगर

00778.

2001/06

47. 9291284

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताम्बा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेक वाल्व

प्रेस्टीज इंटरनेशनल १, राम बाग बुलन्दपुर रोड ट्रॉसपोर्ट नगर जालंधर 144 004 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1307

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 48. 9291385 2001/06

(6)

(5)

(7)

02553

01 90 सुरक्षा काँच

हिन्दुस्तान सेफ्टी ग्लास वर्क्स लि.

बमरौली इलाहाबाद -211 012

49. 9291486 2001/05

एस्सार केबल्स एण्ड कंडक्टर्स एचपीएसआईडीसी बी 1 , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, बद्दी 50. 9291587 2001/06

सिडवाल रेफ्रिजरेशन इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , मनथेपल नाहन रोड कला अम्ब जिला सिरमौर 51. 9291688 2001/07

नवजोत सीमेंट कंस्ट्रक्शन ( प्रा. ) लि. , गाँव चहेल फरीदकोट 52. 9291789 2001/06

गेटस इंडिया प्रा. लि. , गाँव सरसिनी अम्बाला चण्डीगढ़ हाइवें, लालरू 53. 9291890 2001/07

मरकरी सिलिण्डर्स प्रा . लि. , यूपीएसआईडी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , साइट बी, आगरा रोड़, मथुरा

54. 9291991 2001/06

माइना इलैक्ट्रॉनिक्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , 106 उद्योग विहार फेस 4, गुड़गाँव 122 015 55. 9292084 2001/07

सूर्या शक्तिविसल्स प्रा. लि. , गाँव डींग समीप असौटी रेलवे स्टेशन बल्लबगढ 56. 9292185 2001/07

क्वालिटी पम्प प्रा . लि. , 95-ए दादा नगर कानपुर

57. 9292286 2001/07

मोहिन्दर पौलिशिंग वर्क्स ग्यासपुर रोड, जी टी रोड़, लुधियाना 141 003 58. 9292387 2001/06

सेन्चुरी पल्प एण्ड पेपर घनश्यामधाम पी ओ लालरू जिला नैनीताल 262 402 59. 9292488 2001/06

साई वेल्डिग टेकनोलोजी ( इंडिया ) गाँव साइली समीप एमडीएक्स पब्लिकस्कूल, पठानकोट 145001

2001/06

60. 9292589

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड़ कला अम्ब तहसील-नाहन जिला सिरमौर

00398

01 96 शिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक भाग 1

01475

78 पीने के पानी के सेल्फ कॉनटेन्ड वॉटर कूलर

01489

01 91 पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट

02396

88 रबड़ होज

01 92

03196

अल्पदाब द्रवणीय गैसों के लिए 5 - लिटर से अधिक जलक्षमता वाले वेल्डित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात केसिलिंडर

12449

02 88 स्टाटिंग युक्तियाँ भाग 2 कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं

03196

01 92 अल्पदाब द्रवणीय गैसों के लिए 5-लिटर से अधिक जलक्षमता वाले वेल्डित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात के सिलिंडर

14101

94 गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबर में घटक- ढलवा लोहा

01729

79 अपशिष्ट और संवातन के लिए रेत के साँचों में ढले लोहे के सिपगॉट और सॉकेट पाइप, फिटिंग और सहायकांग

सादा फोटो कापी के पेपर

14490

00814

हस्तय धातु आर्क वेल्डिंग के लिए आवृत्त कार्बन और कार्बन मेंगनीज इस्पात इलैक्ट्रोड

82 ईथियॉन ई सी

10319 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

1308

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

02202 01

2001/07

9292690

61.

पंजाब प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

01166

2001/07

62. 9292791

स्मृति प्रॉडक्टस प्रा. लि. , 55 किमी मील पत्थर स्टेट हाइवे साह अम्बाला -133 104

आंशिक रूप से मक्खन निकाला संधानित दूध और पूर्णरूप से मक्खन निकीला संधनिक दूध

01 93

06595

2001/07

929289:2

63.

अपोलो पम्प्स दशमेश नगर सरहिन्द

साफ और ठंडे पानी के लिए क्षैतिज अपकेन्द्री पम्प भाग 1 कृषि और ग्रामीण जल पूर्ति के लिए

01328

परत चढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

9292993

64.

2001/07

एस. आर. जिन्दल प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज ओल्ड सहारनपुर रोड, 'खसरा नं. 55/3 , समीप अग्रसेन चौक, जगाधरी -135 003

02567

मैलाथियॉन ई सी

2001/06

9293086

65.

भारत ओरगेनिक्स, ए-2/3यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, सण्डीला, हरदोई

01729

2001/07

9293187

66.

अपशिष्ट को अरसंवातन के लिए रेत के साँचों में ढले लोहे के सिपगॉट और सॉकेट पाइप, फिटिंग और सहायकांग

अरूण फाउण्डर्स एण्ड इंजीनियर्स, जी टी रोड, सम्मुख पुराना अमृतसर ऑक्टरायूपोस्ट, बटाला-143 505

12269

53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

2001/07

67. 929.3288

सैनिक फाइनेंस एण्ड इंडस्ट्रीज लि. गाँव जलिनवाल, पीओ सुथाना तहसील बावल, जिला रेवाड़ी

01328

परत चढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

2001/07

9293389

68.

एस.एन.डोर्स ( इंडिया ) प्रा लि, गाँव लालपुर, पीओ ददरौल, जलालाबाद रोड, शाहजहाँपुर-242001

00694

2001/07

9293490

69 .

1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोधित केबल

फाइन स्विचगियर्स, 39-40 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , फगवाड़ा

01 99

02202

2001/07

9293591

70.

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

एस.आर. जिन्दल प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, समीप अग्रसेन चौक, पुराना सहारनपुर रोड, जगाधरी -135003

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/07

9293692

71.

यश प्लाइवुड प्रा लि, आगरा बाइपास रोड, मैनपुरी

F [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1309

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 72. 9293793 2001/07

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा. ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहसील नाहन, जिला सिरमौर 73. 9293894 2001/07

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहसील नाहन, जिला सिरमौर 74. 9293995 2001/07

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहसील नाहन, जिला सिरमौर 75. 9294088 2001/07

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा. ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहस्रीन नाहन, जिला सिरमौर 76. 9294189 2001/07

एम.के. प्रॉडक्ट्स प्रा. लि. , गाँवसोफ्ता हरफली, तहसील पलवल, फरीदाबाद

77. 9294290 2001/07

रुकमणी पॉलीट्यूबर्स (प्रा) लि. , 43किमी स्टोन एनएच 10, शिव उद्योग विहार, बहादुरगढ

78. 9294391 2001/07

रूकमणी पॉलीट्यूबर्स ( प्रा ) लि. , 43किमी स्टोन एनएच 10 , शिव उद्योग विहार, बहादुरगढ

79. 9294492 2001/08

हिमाचल प्लाईवुड ( प्रा ) लि. , प्लाट नं.1 और 2 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया शम्शी, कुल्लू 80. 9294593 2001/07

नेशनल टाइल्स कारपोरेशन, 36 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 1 , पंचकूला-134113 81. 9294694 2001/07

सुप्रीम एजेन्सिस 135, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 1 , पंचकूला

82. 9294795 2001/07

सुरिन्दर इंजीनियरिंग कं. लि. गाँव चलहेरी राजपुरा - अम्बाला रोड (एनएच 1 ) समीप एसवाईएल केनल जिला पटियाला , राजपुरा-141401 83. 9294896 2001/07

यूनिवर्सल इंजीनियर्स, 17.6 किमी लखनऊ- बाराबंकी रोड, गाँव मोहम्मदपुर चौकी, बाराबंकी

(5)

(6)

(7)

13403

92 कीटनाशक एनिलोफॉस

09356

80 ब्यूटाक्लोर ईसी

11995

87 आइसोप्रोट्यूरॉन डब्ल्यूपी

कीटनाशक कारबेंडाजिम

08446

01838 01 83 कंक्रीट की पटरियाँ एव संरचनाओं मेंविस्तार जोड़ो के पूर्व निर्मित परकों (अनिष्कासित एवं लचीले टाइप) भाग 1 डामर मिले रेशे

2000

04985

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए गैर प्लास्टिकृत पीवीसी पाइप

10124

01 88 पेयजल आपूर्ति हेतु सीवरोचित पीवीसीफिटिंग

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

13801

93 चकोरदार सीमेंट कंक्रीट टाइलें

03564

द्रवचालित डोर क्लोजर

01 90

01239

मृदु इस्पात की नलियाँ नलिकाकार सामग्रियाँ तथा पिटवां इस्पात की अन्य फिटिंगे

00458

88 पूर्व दलित कंक्रीट पाइप ( प्रबलन सहित और रहित ) 1310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

2001/07

84. 9294997

इंडिया पेस्टीसाइड्स लि. , बी-17 से 23 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, देवा रोड चिन्हात लखनऊ-227105 85. 9295090 2001/07

जीके इंडस्ट्रीज ई-18और 19 फोकल प्वाइंट, डबवाली रोड, भटिंडा 86. 9295191 2001/08

पनलैंड बेवरेजिज ( प्रा ) लि. , जयपुरा रोड, गाँव दीपनगर तहसील पायल, समीप दोराहा, लुधियाना

2001/08

87. 9295292

गोरव फूडप्रॉडक्ट्स, 156, एचसीआईडीसी कुण्डली इंड. एरिया, फेस 11 , सोनीपत 2001/08

88. 9295393

रोबस्टइंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , 162.3 किमी जी.टी. रोड, समीप गाँव साँवला, कुरूक्षेत्र

89. 0205494 2001/07

स्वरूप केमीकल्स ( प्रा ) लि. , जी 31 से 35 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, देवा रोड, चिन्हात, लखनऊं 2001/07

90. 9295595

शिवम प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव कामीमाजरा , पीओ शादीपुर, खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर 91. 9295696 2001/07

रेडसन टाइल्स एण्ड पेवर्स ( प्रा ) लि. 375 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 11 पंचकूला

92. 9295797 2001/08

गंगा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर, 93. 9295801 2001/08

गंगा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, खजूरी रोड, समीप ऑक्टराय , यमुना नगर

94. 9295902 2001/08

मैजिक पेंट इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँवटिब्बा सहनेवाल, लुधियाना

95. 9296092 2001/08

जगदम्बे इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव नूरपुर डोना, जालंधर रोड, कपूरथला

2001/08

96 9296193

शिवम प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव कामीमाजरा , पीओ शादीपुर यमुनानगर

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

(7)

(6)

(5)

03900

जिराम, तकनीकी

02082

बिजली के पानी गर्म करने के भंडारण किस्मके स्थिर हीटर

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

01011

92 बिस्कुट

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्दप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

78 गामा- बीएचसी ( लिण्डेन ) ई सी 00632

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

13801

93 चकोरदार सीमेंट कंक्रीट टाइलें

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

92 सीमेंट रंगरोगन

05410

08391

कुशनिंग के लिए रबड़ चढ़े नारियल जटा की शीट

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926 .

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 97. 9296294 2001/08

इक्वलमिनरल्स 212, फेस II इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, पंचकूला

98. 9296395 2001/08

कंधारी बेवरेजिज लि. , गाँव काथा, बद्दी तहसील नालागढ़, जिला सोलन 99. 9296496 2001/08

आत्मवायर्स, गाँव रतौल बेट कोट- आईसे- खान रोड, ज़िरा, जिला फिरोजपुर 100. 9296597 2001/08

माइना इलैक्ट्रॉनिक्स प्रा. लि. , 106 , उद्योग विहार, फेस 4 , गुड़गाँव

101.

2001/08

9296601

सम्पन्न ओवरसीज प्रा. लि. , जी-51 , जैनपुर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , कानपुर देहात 102. 9296702 2001/08

यश प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , आगरा बाईपास रोड़, मैनपुर

103. 9296803 2001/08

एच.पी. एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज कारपोरेशन, लि. , पेस्टीसाइड्स फार्मूलेशन यूनिट, प्लॉट नं. 8 सेक्टर 5 , परवानू जिला सोलन 104. 9296904 2001/08

भारत रसायन एग्रो प्रा. लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड़; कला अम्बा, तहसील नाहन , जिला सिरमौर 105. 9297094 2001/08

सुर्दशन डोर्स प्रा.लि. , विसायकपुर रनिया, कानपुर देहात 106. 9297195 2001/08

सेन्चुरी पल्प एण्ड पेपर, धनश्यामधाम पीओ लालकुआं, जिला नैनीताल 107. 9297296 2001/08

राजज्वेलर्स, 9 , जनपथ मार्केट, हरात गंज, लखनऊ-226001 108. 9297397 2001/08

हरियाणा एग्रो फर्टिलाइजर्स एण्ड केमीकल, जी. टी. रोड़, शाहबाद मारकण्डा, जिला कुरुक्षेत्र 109. 9297401 2001/08

शिवालिक एग्रो केमीकल्स, बी-59 , फेस 7 , सासनगर, मोहाली

1311 (5)

(6)

(7)

98 पैकेजबन्द पेयजल जल ( पैकेज बन्द 14543 प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेयजल जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

00814

91 हस्तय धातु आर्क वेल्डिंग के लिए आवृत्त कार्बन और कार्बन मैंगनीज इस्पात इलैक्ट्रोड

10322 05 02 85 झिरीदार बत्ती उपकरण भाग 5 विशेष अपेक्षाएँ

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

02202 01

99 लाकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

11997

फेनवेलरेट ई सी

87 एसीफेट एस पी

12916

02202 01

99 लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

प्रिंटिंग और लिखने वाले पेपर 01848

01417

99 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

2569

78 मैलाथियॉन जल पयसनीय चूर्ण सांद्र

08708

78 मेनकोजेब जल पायसनीय चूर्ण सांद्र 1312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

9297502

110.

2001/08

जमुनादास निक्का मल जैल सर्राफ प्रा.लि, 455 दि माल, लुधियाना-141001 2001/08

111. 9297603

इको केबल्स प्रा. लि. , सी-113 , फेस 7, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, सासनगर, मोहाली, 160055 112. 9297704 2001/08

क्वालिटीफोम, जी-26, साइट 1 , पनकी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, कानपुर

9297805 2001/08

113.

सिंगला मोटर्स, 5 किमी स्टोन कैथल रोड, करनाल

114. 9297906 2001/08

लक्ष्मीइंडस्ट्रीज़, बी-2, एम आई ई मम्मा चौक बहादुरगढ़

115. 9298096 2001/08

नेस्लेइंडिया लि. , फिरोज़पुर- लुधियाना रोड़, मोगा-142001

2001/08

116. 9298197

आर.के . बोर्ड इंडस्ट्रीज़ , गांव घो शतिपुर कण्डीरोड़, पटानकोट

117. 9298201 2001/08

हीरा इंडस्ट्रीज़, प्रीति नगर टांडारोड़ जांलधर-144004 2001/08

118. 9298302

एस. एम. वाल्व्स, डी-41 , स्पोर्ट्स एण्ड सर्जिकल गुडस कॉम्प, बस्ती बाव खेल , कपूरथला रोड़, जालंधर-144021 119. 9298403 2001/09

एपिक एग्रो गॉव मोहरा जी.टी. रोड़, अम्बाला छावनी 2001/09

120. 9298504

स्वरूप केमीकल्स प्रा. लि. , जी-31 से 35 , यूपीएस आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, देवा रोड चिन्हात, लखनऊ 2001/08

121. 9298605

समसंग केबल्स इंडस्ट्रीज़ , बेगम पुर खटोला रोड़, बेहराम पुर गांव, गुडगांव 9298706

122.

2001/07

आल्विनइंटरप्राइजिज ( इंडिया ) लि. , 116, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया ए लुधियाना

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

(7)

(6)

(5)

01417

99 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

00694

1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोधित केबल

01741

60 लेटैक्सफोम रबड़ उत्पाद

07538

कृषिअनुप्रयोग के अपकेन्द्री पम्प केलिए तीन फेजीय स्क्विरल केज प्रेरण मोटरें

10908

91 द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के लिए रबड़ की नम्य नालियां

02 92

13334

मलाई युक्त दूध पाउडर भाग 2 अतिरिक्त ग्रेड

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

02347

घरेलूप्रेशर कुकर

00778

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताम्बामिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेक वाल्व

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

09356

ब्यूटोक्लोर ई सी

00694

1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित केबल

00366

91 विद्युत इस्तरी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1313

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(4) (1)

(3)

(2)

2001/07

9298807

123.

आल्वन इंटरप्राजिज ( इंडिया) 116, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया ए चीमा चौक लुधियाना 124. 9298908 2001/09

कोठारी बेवरेजिज प्रा. लि. , 68-बी उद्योग नगर, कानुपर 9299001 2001/09

125.

शान एल्युमीनियम कम्पनी, गॉव कमली परवानू, जिलासोलन

2001/09

126. 9299102

सीएनसी कमर्शियल लि. गॉव मुबारक पुर, तहसील डेरा बस्सी, जिला पटियाला 127. 9299203 2001/08

सीएनसी कमर्शियल लि. , गॉव मुबारक पुर, तहसील डेरा बस्सी, जिला पटियाला

2001/09

9299304

128.

एलाइट प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज ( प्रा. ) लि. , टिम्बर मार्केट , सहारपुर रोड़, यमुना नगर-135001 129. 9299405 2001/09

हरियाणा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज़ (प्रा. ) लि. , 33 किमी स्टोन, जी. टी. करनाल रोड पीओ कुण्डली, जिला सोनीपत -131028

2001/09

130. 9299506

एलाइट प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज ( प्रा. ) लि. , टिप्बर मार्केट, सहारनपुर रोड, यमुना नगर -135001

2001/09

131. 9299607

मेटल मॉल्डर्स, 26 इंड. एक्सटे . एरिया, फेस 1 गंग्याल जम्मू

2001/09

132. 9299708

उर्मिल उद्योग, टांडा रोड, सम्मुख देवी तालाब मंदिर, जालंधर 133. 9299809 2001/09

एम बी प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज ( प्रा० ) लि. , पीओ धनपुर रुद्रपुर, जिला यू० एस ० नगर

2001/08

134, 9299910

गुरु अमर इंडस्ट्रीज, डी-124, फोकल प्वाइंट , फेस 5 , लुधियाना-141010

2001/09

9300057

135.

बत्रा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज , वीपीओ सैदपुर, तहसील खरखोडा, जिला सोनीपत 826GI/04-6

(7) (5)

(6)

0030202 03

घरेलू और समाम विघुत साधित्रों की सुरक्षा भाग 2 विशेष अपेक्षाएं अनु. 3 विद्युत इस्तरी

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

00694

90 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोचित केबल

02202 01 99 लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

01659

ब्लाक बोर्ड

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

02202 01

99 लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

01659

ब्लाक बोर्ड

00903

93 अग्नि होज़ प्रदाय युग्मन शाखा पाइप नोज़ल और नाकज़ल पाने

00278

बाड लगाने के लिए जस्तीकृत इस्पात के काटेंदार तार

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2000

14769

घरेलूसिलाई मशीन के हैड

90 ब्लाकबोर्ड

01659 1314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 136. 9300152 2001/09

बत्रा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, वीपीओ सैदपुर, जटोला रोड, तहसील खरखोडा जिला सोनीपत 130 001 137. 9300259 2001/09

एशियन इंडिस्ट्रीज 119/6 किमी स्टोन जी.टी. रोड, करनाल

138. 9300360 2001/09

पशुपति सीमेंटस ( प्रा ० ) लि० 680/1,3,5 , पटनवा पो. ओ बसंत नगर पुलिस.स्टेशन राननगर जिला चन्दौली

139. 9300461 2001/09

भाटिया इंडस्ट्रियल कारपो. समीप किंगफिशर गाँव धूलकोट, अम्बाला छावनी 2001/09

140. 9300562

बेदी एक्सपोर्टस इंटरनेशनल सी-89फोकल प्वाइंट एक्सटें जालंधर

141. 9300663 2001/09

त्रवरसे मार्केटिंग सर्विसेस 5, सम्मुख पुलिस लाइन्स सुभाष रोड रोहतक 124 001 142. 9300764 2001/09

भारत ऑरगनिक्स ए-2/3युपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया सण्डीला हरदोई 143. 9300865 2001/09

जम्मूएण्ड कश्मीर मिनरल लि. वूयान सीमेंट फेक्टरी गाँव बूयान जिला श्रीनगर 144. 9300966 2001/09

राजिन्द्राप्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा. ) लि. , गाँव तमसरा दिल्लीमथुरा रोड पलवल 121 105 2001/09

145. 9301059

प्रा. लि. , 194 , उद्योग विहार गुडगांव नवशिखा पोलीपैक इंडिस्ट्रीज 146. 9301160 2001/09

स्टडस एसेसॉरिज लि० , प्लॉट नं ० 61 सेक्टर 27 ए फरीदाबाद

147. 9301261 2001/09

जुनेजा मेटल वर्कस गॉव वरियाना कपूरथला रोड पीओ बस्तीगुजाँ जालंधर 144002

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] (5)

(7)

(6)

00303

89. सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

02494 01

लिए निरन्ज V- पट्टे V-पट्टे औद्योगिक प्रयोजन के भाग -1 सामान्य प्रयोजन

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट

01489 01

02082

93 बिजली के पानी गर्म करने के भंडारण किस्म के स्थिर हीटर

01879

87 धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

82 थिराम बीज उपचारण फार्मूलेशन 04783

08112

89 43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

90 ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

2000

04985

पेय जल आपूर्ति के लिए गैर- प्लास्टिकृत पीवीसी पाइप

02925

84. औद्योगिक सुरक्षा हेलमेट

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 148. 9301362 2001/09

बीर वाल्व इंडिस्ट्री जी टी रोड़ बाईपास मकसूदन जालंधर 144008 149. 9301463 2001/09

आरको मैन्यूफैक्चरिंग कं. सी-3, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट जालंधर 144004 150. 9301564 2001/09

जय एस इंडस्ट्रीज़ एस-141 सोडल चौक जालंधर 144004 151. 9301685 2001/09

सोंधीमैन्यूफैक्चरिंग कं. केनल रोड़ आउटसाइड इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया जालंधर 144001 152. 9301766 2001/09

वरुणा इंजी० कं. प्रीत नगर रोड़ इंडस्ट्रियलएरिया जालंधर 144004 153. 9301867 2001/09

एम के वाल्वप्रॉडक्टस ई-48, फोकल प्वाइंट एक्सटें ० जालंधर

154. 9301968 2001/09

सोंधी इंडिस्ट्रीज ( रजि० ) आउटसाइड इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया जालंधर शहर

155. 9302061 2001/09

चोपड़ा इंजीनियरिंग कारपो ० , बी-1-821 अमन नगर जालंधर

156. 9302162 2001/10

दिनायक एक्वफ्लैक्स ( प्रा ० ) लि० समीप माजरा रोड साहनेवाल ऑक्टराय पोस्ट साहनेवाल कलां जी टी० रोड, लुधियाना 157. 9302263 2001/09

मॉडर्न मेलिएबल्स लाम्बा पिंड बाईपास जी टी रोड जालंधर

158. 9302364 2001/10

पंजाब टीक प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज गॉव कामी- माजरा पीओ शादीपुर खजूरी रोड़, यमुनानगर:

159. 9302465 2001/10

पंजाब टीक प्लाईवूड इंडस्ट्रीज गॉव कामी- माजरा पीओ शादीपुर खजूरी रोड़, यमुनानगर

1315 (5)

(6)

(7)

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

14846

2000 जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

14846

2000 जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

14846

2000 जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

01879

87 धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

01879

87 धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

1316

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3).

(2)

(1)

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2001/10

160. 9302566

वी एम प्लाईवुड इंडिस्ट्रीज शिव विहार सोनीपत रोड़ पी ओ सॉपला , जिला रोहतक

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/10

9302667

161.

वी एम प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज शिव विहार सोनीपत रोड़, पीओ साँपला

89 .

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/10

9302768

162.

अग्रवाल टिम्बर प्रॉडक्टस डब्ल्यू१ , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया यमुनानगर

14543

2001/10

163. 9302869

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

सागर हैल्थप्रॉडक्ट्स उद्योग नगर बंशीवाला वृन्दावन मथुरा

00458

2001/10

9302970

164.

पूर्व ढलित कंकरीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

हयूम पाइप इंजीनियर्स ( प्रा) लि० रामपुरा देवराज बक्शी का तलाब सीतापुर रोड, लखनऊ

08944

क्लोरपाइरिफास ई सी

2001/10

9303063

165.

पंजाब पेस्टीसाइडस इंडस्ट्रियल कॉ- आप. सोसइटी लि० गॉव खानपुर जिला रोपड़

12818

2001/09

166. 9303164

बोर नलकूपों के लिए अनम्यकूत पीवीसी जाली और आवरक पाइप

राकेन इंडस्ट्रीज लि० बी-4 साइट 1 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया उन्नाव

00269

33ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

2001/09

9303265

167.

सिग्मा सीमेंट्सलि० गॉव धेरोवाल पी और मन्झोली तहसील नालागढ़, जिला सोलन

00458

2001/09

168. 9303366

पूर्व ढलित कंकरीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

हिमाचल स्पन उद्योग गाँव धेरोवाल पीओ मन्झोली तहसील नालागढ़ , जिला सोलन

2000

14846

2001/09

9303467

169.

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

वीनस इंडस्ट्रीज ई-57 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया जालंधर 144004

02082

2001/10

9303568

170.

बिजली के पानी गर्म करने के भंडारण किस्म के स्थिर हीटर

लीडर्स पम्प्स एण्ड मोटर्स डी-1/117 संजय कॉलोनी, सैक्टर 23 फरीदाबाद

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2001/10

9303669

171.

डायमण्ड प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज वीपीओ परवालों पुराना सहारनपुर रोड़, जगाधरी 135 003

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/10

9303770

172.

डायमण्ड प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज वीपीओ परवालों पुराना सहारनपुर रोड़, जगाधरी 135.003 1317

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4) (1) (2)

(3)

2001/10

9303871

173.

सेन्चुरी पेनल्स (प्रा. ) लि. गाँव गंगेर राम्बा रोड तरोड़ी तहसील निलोखेरी, जिला करनाल

2001/10

9303972

174.

बामर लॉरी एण्ड कं. लि. मार्केटिंग कॉम्पलेक्स पी ओ पानीपत रिफाइनरी बी- बाकिली पानीपत 132140 9304065 2001/10

175.

मनाली फूड एण्ड बेवरेजिज इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव बशिंग पीओ बाबेली कुल्लू 9304166 2001/10

176.

कोशिका प्लाईवुड (प्रा. ) लि. 42किमी स्टोन दिल्ली रोहतक रोड, पीओ रोड, जिला झज्जर

9304267 2001/09

177.

स्काईटोन इलैक्ट्रिकल्स (इंडिया) लि. 42 और 43 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, एन.आई.टी. फरीदाबाद 121001 2001/09

178. 9304368

एस.आर.गन पावर इंडस्ट्रीज बी-20/1 बी फाउण्ड्री नगर आगरा 282006 .

9304469 2001/09

179.

बीर इंडस्ट्रीज जी.टी. रोड बाईपास मकसुडान जालंधर 144 008 9304570 2001/10

180.

ईस्टर्न इंडस्ट्रीज 84/14/ -ए इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया फजलगंज कानपुर 2001/10

181. 9304671

अग्रवाल टिम्बर प्रॉडक्टस डब्ल्यू-१ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया यमुना नगर

2001/10

182. 9304772

एडोनिस मेडीकल इक्यूप्मेंट्स प्रा. लि. ई -70 फेस 8 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया मोहाली 160 0055 2001/09

9304873

183.

हिन्द आयरन फाउण्ड्री रेलवे रोड बटाला 143.505

(6)

(7) (5)

12202

01 99 तेलज्वलन साधित्र (दाब टाइप और बिना दाब टाइप ) से संबंधित पारिभाषित शब्दावली

01783

02 88 बंदसिरे वाले बड़े ड्रम

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

01 88

07098

अनुप्रस्थजुड़े हुए पॉलीइथाईलीन विद्युतरोधी ताप स्थापी ढके केबज

10001

सामान्यप्रयोजनों (20 किलोवाट तक ) के लिए एक समान गति वाले संपीडन प्रजवलित (डीजल) इंजनों हेतु कार्यकारिता संबंधित अपेक्षाएं

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

01989

चमड़े के सुरक्षा बूट और जूते

01659.

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

07620 01

चिकित्सकीय विद्युत उपस्कर नैदानिक एक्स- रे उपस्कर

01729

अपशिष्ट को अरसंवातन के लिए रेत के साँचों में ढले लोहे 'के सिपगॉट और सॉकेट पाइप, फिटिंग और सहायकांग 1318

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] (1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7) 184. 9304974 2001/10

12269

53ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

87 ब्लेडिंग एण्ड पैकिंग प्लांट इलाहाबाद यूनिट ऑफ प्राइज्म सी गाँव धनुआ रेवा हाइवे नैनी 12किमी

185. 9305067 2001/10

01489

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट

01 91 ब्लेडिंग एण्ड पैकेजिंग प्लांट इलाहाबाद यूनिट ऑफ प्राइज्म सी गाँव धनुआ रेवा हाइवे नैनी 12 कि.मी. फ्राम इलाहाबाद, इलाहाबाद

9305168

186.

2001/10

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैण्ड सीमेंट 08112

89 ब्लेडिंग एण्ड पैकेजिंग प्लांट इलाहाबाद यूनिट ऑफ प्राइज्म सी गाँव धनुआ रेवा हाइवे नैनी 12कि.मी. फ्राम इलाहाबाद, इलाहाबाद

187. 9305269 2001/10

इस्पात के ढक्कनदार कब्जे

01341

92 सरस्वतीस्टील इंड. गाँव धुरकारा हिस्सार रोड अम्बाला छावनी

9305370 2001/10

188.

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

गोयल एक्वा एण्ड पैकेजर्स प्रा. लि. 399 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 2 पंचकूला

189. 9305471 2001/09

01554

01 88 ई.एच.वी. पावर केबल एण्ड वायर प्रा.लि. 1 - सी- II इंड. एक्सटेंशन गाँधी नगर जम्मू180 004

पीवीसी रोधित ( भारी कार्य ) बिजली की केबल भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

190.

2001/10

9305572

09359

कीटनाशक फोरेट जी सम्पूटित

जय श्री रसायन उद्योग लि. वीपीओ नाथुपर, जिला सोनीपत

191. 9305673 2001/10

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

हीमन्सप्रॉडक्टस प्रा. लि. प्लॉट नं. 14 न्यूडीएलएफ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फरीदाबाद 121 003

192. 930577.4 2001/10

क्लोरपाइरिफास ई सी

08944

78 स्वरूप केमीकल्स ( प्रा. ) लि. जी-31 से 35 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया देवा रोड, चिन्हात लखनऊ

193. 9305875 2001/10

00458

पूर्वढलित कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

बंसल ट्यूब्स ( आर सी सी) वीपीओ देहलान मेहनतपुर, जिला उना

2001/10

194. 9305976

14543

98 भगवती पैट ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. 35/बी/ 22 मॉडल टाउन, बरेली 342005

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्दप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 195. 9306069 2001/09

हिमालयन पेट्रो प्रॉडक्टस एण्ड एलाइड वर्क्स ( प्रा ) लि लामाचौर हल्द्वानी, जिला नैनीताल

196. 9306170 2001/10

जय बालाजी प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा) लि. जटोला रोड, गाँव सैदपुर, जिला सोनीपत 197. 9306271 2001/10

बिमल एल्युमीनियम्स (प्रा) लि. 31-ए शिव शंकर नगर ओरिएन्टल इंश्योरेंस कं. लि. के पीछे कोर्ट रोड, जगाधरी 135 003

2001/10

198. 9306372

अनीता सांइटिफिक ग्लास एण्ड प्लास्टिक वर्क्स 27, प्रताप नगर पुलिस स्टेशन रोड, पीओ महेश नगर अम्बाला छावनी 133 001 199. 9306473 2001/10

कृष्णा रबड़ इंटरप्राइसेज जी.टी. रोड़, उचानी करनाल 132001 200. 9306574 2001/10

लिबर्टी प्लाइवुड ( प्रा ) लि.. वीपीओ वेपला जगाधरी रोड, अम्बाला छावनी 201. 9306675 2001/10

लिबर्टी प्लाइवुड ( प्रा ) लि. वीपीओ वेपला जगाधरी रोड, अम्बाला छावनी 202. 9306776 2001/10

सी.आर. औलक एण्ड संस लि. 426 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया लुधियाना 141 003 203. 9306877 2001/10

पॉली प्रोसेस इंजीनियर्स 131 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 1 , चंडीगढ़ 160 002 204. 9306978 2001/10

लीडरवाल्व्सलि. एस -3 , एस -4 इंडस्ट्रियल टाउन जालंधर 205. 9307071 2001/10

क्वालिटी स्पन पाइप फैक्टरी गाँव ताहिल साहिब, पीओ करतारपुर जिला जालंधर

1319 (5)

(6)

(7) पेराफिनमोम

04654

93 ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

02347

95 घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर

01223

03 82 विधि से दूग्ध वसा के के लिए यंत्र

02494

01 94 V- पट्टे औद्योगिक प्रयोजत के लिए निरन्ज V- पट्टे भाग 1 सामान्य प्रयोजन

00303

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

12109

लाइट डयूटी सिलाई मशीन

07231

94 अंग्रेजी टट्टियों और मुत्रालयों के लिए प्लास्टिक के प्रधावन टंकिया

14846

2000 जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

00458

88 पूर्वढलित कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

[फा.सं. सीएमडी-4/13: 11 ]

एस. के. चौधरी, उप महानिदेशक [PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

1320

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumerAffairs)

(BRUEAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi , the 17th March, 2004

S.O. 745. In pursuance of Sub -regulation (5) of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) regulations, 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Title of the Standards

ISNo. Part Sec. year Sl.No. Licence No.

Name&Address ofthe Party

Operative Date Year/Month

00269

OPC33 Grade

2001/06

9286695

Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. NearGurunanak Dev Thermal PlantMalout Road.. Bhatinda- 151005.

8112

43Grade OPC

9286796 2001/06

Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. Near Gurunanak Dev Thermal PlantMalout Road, Bhatinda- 151005 .

96 2001/06

9286897

Electrical Accessoir Circuit

Fine Switchgears 39-40, Industrial Area Phagwara- 144401

08794

2001/06

9286901

Cast Iron Detachable Joint

Dharam EngineeringCo. G.T. Road, Batala- 143505

00303

2001/06

9287091

Plywood forGeneral Purposes

Jyoti Plywood Industries Industrial Estate Phase - I Yamunanagar - 135001

02569

Malation WP

2001/06

9287192

Goel Chemicals 188,Nagraur Gonda Road, Bahraich

00303

2001/06

9287293

Plywood for General Purposes

Supreme Lumbers Plot No , 20B Sector 1 Parwanoo , Distt . Solan

09356

Butachlor EC

2001/06

8. 9287394

Markfed Agro Chemicals 7 & 8B , Industrial Area Phase I Mohali.

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

2001/06

9. 9287495

Varun Beverages Ltd. , 10th Km. Stone Agra Delhi Highway Vill: Dautana Teh . Chhatta Distt. Mathura

03906

9287596 2001/06

10.

HandOperated Knapsack Sprayer

Commercial Sales Corporation 21, Panchwati Colony Picnic SpotRoad Near Nainital, Public School , Mahanagar , Lucknow -226006

01659

Block Boards

2001/06

11. 9287697

Modern Wood Industries Jhota Road, Jagadhri 1321

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/ चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

2001/06.

9287701

12.

Modern Wood Industries JhotaRoad, Jagadhri 2001/06

9287802

13.

Iceberg Foods Ltd. 44th Km Delhi -Rohtak HighwayVill. & Post Rohad, Distt. Jhajjar

2001/06

9287903

14.

SquareMineral Water Pvt. Ltd. , 321 , Phase IX Industrial Area, Mohali

2001/06

15. 9288093

JunejaMetal Works Vill .Variana Kapurthala Road PO Basti Guzan, Jalandhar-144002

2001/06

9288194

16.

JaiBalaji Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. Jatola road Vill. Saidpur Auchandi Border Distt: Sonepat

2001/06

9288295

17.

Daily Agro Milk Foods India Pvt. Ltd. 9A , HSIDC Indl . Estate Kundli Distt: Sonepat - 131028

2001/06

9288396

18.

Nestle India Ltd. Patti Kalyana Kiwana Road Samalkha - 132101

2001/06

9288497

19.

OswalElectricals (Pumps) 71/3 Milestone G.T. Road Kamal.

2001/06

9288501

20.

Arihant Beverages Pvt. Ltd. E-25 , UPSIDC Site C Indl . Area Vill. Artoni Sikandra Agra

2001/06

9288602

21.

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

09890

General Purpose BallValves

00303.

Plywood for General Purposes

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

00325

Three Phase Induction Motors

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Jay Kay Beverages

262, Kampoo Ghat Ice Factory

Compound,Mathura

2001/06

9288703

22.

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

Asianlak Health Foods Ltd.

VPO Janmdiali-Near Kohara

Distt: Ludhiana

2001/06

9288804

23.

Swarup Chemicals (P) Ltd. G31 To 345 UPSIDC Industrial Area, Dewa Road, Chinhat Lucknow

2001/06

-9288905

.24.

08074

Monocrotophose SL.

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

KasrijaCottonGinning &

Pressing Factory,

Jalalabad Road,

Mukatsar- 152026

2001/06

9289095

25.

Sabas Foods India Pvt. Ltd. , 3-B, Industrial Estate Birpur , Bari Brahmna, Jammu 826G1/04-7

14543

Packaged Drinking Water 1322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004 /CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (11) 2

6 26. 9289196

2001/06

Deformed Steel Bar and 01786.

85 Premier Ispat (P) Ltd. F4& F5 UPSIDC Indl . Area Jainpur Kanpur Dehat-

Wires for Concrete Reinforcement

27.

9289297 2001/06

Skimmed Milk Powder

13334 01

98 Kissan Dudh Udyog Ltd. Vill. Thiriawal , PO Dhandoi Sh. Hargobindpur Road Teh. Batala Distt.: Gurdaspur

28. 9289301 2001/06

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

98 Khukhrain Food Products (P) Ltd. 102Industrial Area (HPSIDC) Baddi Distt.: Solan

29. 9289402 2001/06

BlockBoards

01659

90 Supreme Lumbers Plot No. 20B Sector 1 Parwanoo Distt.: Solan

30. 9289503 2001/06

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

98 Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. A-2, UPSIDC Indl. Area, Site II Bazpur 262401 Distt.: U.S. Nagar

31. 9289604

2001/06

00458

Precast Concrete Pipes

88 R.K. Pipe, Industries Barnala Road Raikot, Ludhiana - 141109

32. 9289705

2001/06

Precast Concrete Pipes 00458

88 Oriental Ceremics & Refratiories Pvt. Ltd. Vill. Daon Tehsil Mohali, Distt.:Ropar

33, 9289806

2001/06

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

98 Farid Agro Tech. India 4thKm. Stone NH 15 KotkapuraRaod, Faridkot- 151203

34. 9289907

2001/06

01592

Asbestos Cement Pressure Pipes

EmpireAsbestos C-18, Industrial Area Phase 1 Mohali

35.

9290080

2001/06

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

98 Densons Poly Products Ltd. GP37HSIDC Sector 18, Gurgaon-122001

36. 9290181

2001/06

PackagedDrinking Water 14543

98 Gemini Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. , 11/7 Milestone, MathuraRoad, Faridabad

37. 9290282

2001/06

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

98 Nuchem Weir Ltd. 20/6, Mathura Road, Faridabad

38.

9290382 2001/06

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

98 Modern Beverages Mirasahib Block R.S. Pura Jammu

39. 9290494

2001/06

08944

Chlorpyrifos EC

78 TrilokpurRoad KalaAmb Bharat Rasayan Agro (P) Ltd. , Teh. Nahan, Distt.: Sirmour 1323

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( i) ]

2001/06

9290585

40.

BharatRasayan Agro (P) Ltd. , Trilokpur Road Kala Amb Teh. Nahan, Distt : Nahan 2001/06

41. 9290686

Classic Watek India Pvt . Plot No. 11 Sector 4 IMT ManaesarGurgaon- 9290787. 2001/06

42.

G.K. Dairy and Milk Products 196/231, Sikri Harfala Road, Ballabhgarh Faridabad- 2001/06

9290888

43.

MagnaMarketing D-3 , Road No. 3 Udyog Kunj Panki Industrial Area, Site 1, Kanpur- 2001/06

9290989

44.

Amba Plastic Industries Vill. ,Rampura Ram Nagar Road, Kashipur Distt.: U.S. Nagar-

2001/06

45. 9291082

Sri Sai Aqua Minerals 20/6, DLF Industrial Area Phase 1 , Faridabad- 121003 2001/06

46. 9291183

DeeKayExports 24, Industrial Estate Phase 1 Yamunanagar- 2001/06

9291284

47.

Prestige International 9,RamBaghBullandpur Road Transport Nagar Jallandhar- 144004 2001/06

48. 9291385

Hindustan Safety Glass Works Ltd. Bamrauj Allahabad-211012 2001/05

9291486

49.

Essar Cables & Conductors HPSIDC BJ , Industrail Estate Baddi

2001/06

9291587

50.

Sidwal Refrigeration Indust. Ltd. Manthepaj , Nahan Road Kala AMR Distt. Sirmour 2001/07

9291688

51 .

Navjot Cement Construction (P)Ltd. Vill., Chahel Faridkot 2001/06

52. 9291789

Gates (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vill, Sarsini Ambala Chandigarh Highway Lalru 2001/07

9291890

53.

Mercurry Cylinders Pvt . Ltd. UPSIDC Industrial Area Site B Agra Road, Mathura 2001/06

9291991

54.

Myna Electronics (P) Ltd. 106, Udyog Vihar Phase IV, Gurgaon-122015

6 5

11997

87 Fenvalerate EC

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

13334 01

Skimmed Milk Powder

03319

Blades Surgical, Detachable

09537 03 83 Conduit for Electrical Installa

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

08249

Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate, Agri

00778

Copper Alloy Gate Globe &Check Valves

02553 01

Safety Glass

00398 01

Alum. Conductors for Overhead Transmission Purposes

01475

SelfContained Drinking Water Coolers

01489 01

Portland Pozzolana Cement

02396

RubberHose for Fuel, Fencing

03196 01

Welded Low Carbon Steel Cylinders

12449 02

SatrtingDevices 1324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

55. 9292084 2001/07 Surya Shakti Vessels Pvt . Ltd. Vill.DeegNear Asaoti, Railway StationBallabgarh- 2001/07

56. 9292185

Quality Pump Pvt . Ltd. 95-A, DadaNagar, Kanpur- 9292286 2001/07

57.

MohinderPolishing Works Giaspur Road,G.T. Road Ludhiana- 141003 58. 9292387 2001/06 CenturyPulp and Paper Ghanahyamdham PO Lalkau Distt: Nainital - 262402 2001/06

59. 9292488

Sai Welding Technology (India) Vill. Saili, Near MDX Public School Pathankot- 145001 2001/06

60. 9292589

Bharat Rasayan Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road Kala AMB Tehsil Nahan Distt : Sirmour- 2001/07

61. 9292690

Punjab Plywood Industries Khajuri Road Yamunanagar- 62. 9292791 2001/7

Smriti Products Pvt . Ltd. 55, KM Mile Stone State Highway Saha Ambala- 133104 63. 9292892 2001/07 Appollo Pumps Dashmesh Nagar Sirhind 2001/07

64. 9292993

S. R. Jindal Plywood Industries Old Saharanpur Road With Khasra No. 55/3 , Near Aggarsain Chowk Jagadhri- 135003 2001/06

65. 9293086

BharatOrganics A- 2/3 , UPSIDC Industrial Area, Sandila Hardoi- 2001/07

66. 9293187

Arun Founders and Engineers G.T. Road Opp . Old Amritsar Octroi Post Batala- 143505 2001/07

67. 9293288

Sainik Finance & Industries Ltd. Vill, Jalinwal PO Suthana Teh. Bawal , Distt: Rewari- 2001/07

68. 9293389

S. N. Doors (India) Pvt . Ltd. Vill . Lalpur PODadraul, JalalabadRoad, Shahjahanpur- 242001 69. 9293490 2001/07 Fine Swithgears 39-40 , Industrial Area, Phagwara-

70. 9293591 2001/07 S. R. Jindal Plywood Industries Near Aggarsain Chowk Old, SaharanpurRoad, Jagadhri-135003

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ]

6 5

03196 01

Welded Low Carbon Steel, Cylinders

14101

94 Deepwell Handpump Components

01729

Sand Cast Iron SPIGOT and Sockets

14490

PlainCopier Paper

00814

91 Covered Electrodes For Manual

10319

EthionEC

02202.01

Wooden Flush Door Shutters

01166

Condensed Milk

06595 01

Horizontal Centrifugal Pumps

01328

Veneered Decorative Plywood

02567

78 Malathion EC

01729

Sand Cast Iron Spigot and Sockets

12269

89 53GRADE Opc

01328

Veneered Decorative Plywood

00694

PVC Insulated Cables

99 Wooden Flush Door Shutters 02202 01 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1325

भारत का राजषक: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1928

4 1

71. 9293692 2001/07 Yash Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Agra bye Pass Road Mainpuri

72. 9293793 2001/07 Bharat Rasayan Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road KalaAMB Teh. Nahan Distt : Sirmour

2001/07

73. 9293894

BharatRasayan Udyog Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road Kala AMB Teh. Nahan Distt: Sirmour

74. 9293995 2001/07 Bharat Rasayan Udyog Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road Kala AMB Teh . Nahan Distt : Sirmour-

75. 9294088 2001/07 BharatRasayan Udyog Agro (P) Ltd., Trilokpur Road KalaAmb Teh. Nahan Distt : Sirmour

76. 9294189 2001/07 M. K. Products Pvt . Ltd. , Vill. SoftaHarfali Teh. Palwal, Faridabad 77.

2001/07

9294290

Rukmini Polytubers (P) Ltd. 43, KM Stone NH- 10 Shiv Udyog Vihar , Bhadurgarh

78. 9294391 2001/07 Rukmini Polytubes (P) Ltd. , 43 , KM Stone NH - 10 Shiv Udyog Vihar , Bahadurgarh .

79. 9294492 2001/08 HimachalPlywood (P) Ltd. , Plot No. 1 & 2 Industrial Area, Shamshi Kulu

2001/07

80. 9294593

National Tiles Corporation , 36, Industrial , Area Phase I, Panchkula- 134113 81. 9294694 2001/07 Supreme Agencies , 135, Industrial Area Phase I , Panchkula 82. 9294795 2001/07 Suprindera Engineering Co.Ltd,. Vill. Chalheri Rajpura-Ambala, Road, (NH - I) Near SYI . -CANAL Distt . Patiala Rajpura- 140401.

83. 9294896 2001/07 Universal Engineers , 17.6 KM Lucknow -Barabanki Road Vill. Mohammadpur Chowk, Barabanki 84. 9294997 2001/07 IndiaPesticides Ltd. , B-17 to 23 UPSIDC Industrial, Area, Deva Road, Chinhat, Lucknow -227105 5

00303

89 Plywood forGeneral Purposes

13403

Pesticide Anilophos

09356

80 Butachlor EC

11995

Isoproturon, WP

08446

91 Pesiticide Carbendazim

01 83

01838

Fillers for Expansion Joint in

04985

2000 Unplasticized PVC Pipes

10124

01 88 PVC Fittings for Potable water

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

13801

Chequered Cement Concrete

03564

95 HydraullicallyRegulated DoorClosers

01 90 Mild Steel tubes, Tubulars 01239

00458

Precast Concrete Pipes

03900

Ziram, Technical 1326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

6 85. 9295090 2001/07

02082

Stationary storage etc. WaterHeaters

Gee Kay Industries E- 18 & 19, Focal Point Dabwali Road, Bhatinda

2001/08

86. 9295191

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Punland Beverages (P) Ltd. , Jaipura Road Vill . Deepnagar, Teh . Payal , Near Doraha, Ludhiana

87. 9295292 2001/08

01011

Biscuits

92 Gorav Food Products 156, HSIDC Kundli Industrial Area, Phase 11 , Sonepat

88. 9295393 2001/08

14543

PackagedDrinkingWater

Robust Industries Pvt. Ltd. , 162.3 K.M. G.T. Road, Near Vill . Sanwla, Kurukshetra

89. 9295494 2001/07

00632

Gamma-BHC (Lindane)EC

Swarup Chemicals Pvt . Ltd. , G-31 , to 35, UPSIDC Industrial Area DewaRoad , Chinhat, Lucknow-

2001/07

90. 9295595

01659

Blockboards

Shivam Plywood Indutries Vill.Kamimajra PO Shadipur, Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar

2001/07

91. 9295696

13801

Chequered Cement Concrete Tiles

Redsun Tiles and Pavers , (P) Ltd. , 375 , Industrial Area, Phase- II , Panchkula

92. 9295797 2001/08

Block Boards

01659

Ganga Plywood Industries, Khajuri Road, Yamunagar

93. 9295801 2001/08

01659

Plywood forGeneral purposes

Ganga Plywood Industries , Khajuri Road, Near Octroi, Yamunagar

94. 9295092 2001/08

Cement Plant

00303

92 Magicpaint Industries , Vill. Tibba Sahnewal , Ludhiana

95. 9296609 2001/08

08391

Rubberized coil sheets for Cushioning

Jagdambe Industries , Vill. Noorpur Dona, JalandharRoad, Kapurthala

96. 9296193 2001/08

00303

Plywood for General purposes

Shivam Plywood Indutries , Vill. Kamimajra, PO Shadipur , Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar

97. 9296294 2001/08

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

Equal Minerals 212, Phase II, Industrial area, Panchkula - 134113

98. 9296395 2001/08

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Kandhari Beverages Ltd. , Vill . Katha, Baddi Teh . Nalagarh Distt . Solan

99. 9296496 2001/08

00814

Covered electrodes forManual

Atam Wires Vill. Ratoui, Bet Kot - ISE-Khan Road Zira, Distt . Ferozepur 1327

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

100. 9296597 2001/08 Myna Electronics Pvt. , Ltd. , 106, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV Gurgaon.

2001/08

101. 9296601

Sampann Overseas Pvt . , Ltd. , G-51 , Jainpur Industrial Area, Kanpur Dehat. 2001/08

102. 9296702

YashPlywood Pvt . Ltd. , Agra Bye Pass Road, Mainpuri.

103. 9296803 2001/08 H.P.Agro Industries , CorporationLtd. , Pesticides Formulation Unit, PlotNo.8, Sector 5 Parwanoo Distt.: Solan. 2001/08

104. 9296904

BharatRasayan Agro (P) Ltd. , Trilokpur Road Kala AMB, Teh. Nahan Distt.: Sirmour.

9297094 2001/08

105.

Sudarshan Doors Pvt . Ltd. , Visayakpur Rania, Kanpur Dehat.

2001/08

106. 9297195

Century Pulp And Paper , Ghanshyamdham PO Lalkua, Distt.: Nainital .

2001/08

107. 9297296

Raj Jewellers, 9, Janpath Market Harrat Ganj , Lucknow -226001 .

2001/08

108. 9297397

HaryanaAgro Fertilizers And Chemical, G.T. Road Shahbad Markanda , Distt.: Kurukshetra .

2001/08

9297401

109.

Shivalik Agro Chemicals , B-59, Phase VII Sas Nagar, Mohali.

9297502 2001/08

110.

Jamna Dass Nikka Mal Jain, Saraf Pvt. Ltd. , 455, TheMall, Ludhiana - 141001 9297603 2001/08

111.

Ecko Cables (P) Ltd. , C-113, Phase VII , Industrial Area, Sas Nagar, Mohali - 160055

2001/08

112. 9297704

Kwality Foam, G-26, Site 1 , Panki Industrial Area,Kanpur.

2001/08

113. 9297805

SinglaMotors, 5KM Stone Kaithal Road, Karnal.

6 5

Luminaires

10322 05 02 85

14543

PackagedDrinkingWater

02202

01 99 Wooden Flush Door Shutters

87 Fenvalerate EC

11997

12916

90 Acephate SP

02202 01

Wooden Flush Door Shutters

01848

WritingAnd Printing Papers

01417

GoldAnd Gold Alloys, Jewellery /

02569

Malathion Water DP

08708

Mancozer Water DP

01417

99 GoldAnd Gold

Alloys, Jewellery

00694

PVC Insulated Cables

01741.

Latex Foam Rubber Product

07538

Three Phase Squirrel Cage Induction Motors 1328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

6 114. 9297906 2001/08

10908

Flexible Rubber Tubing

Laxmi Industries, B -2, MIE Mamma Chowk, Bahadurgarh .

2001/08

115. 9298096

Skimmed Milk Powder

13334 02 92 Nestle India Ltd. , Ferozepur- Ludhiana Road, Moga-142001 .

9298197

116.

2001/08

00303

Plywood forGeneral Purposes

R.K. Road Industry , Vill, Gho Shatipur Kandi Road, Pathankot.

117. 9298201 2001/08

DomesticPressure Cookers 02347

Heera Industries , PreetNagar Tanda Road, Jalandhar- 144004.

118. 9298302 2001/08

00778

CopperAlloyGateGlobe and Check Valves

ESS EMM Valves , D-41, Sports and Surgical Goods, Comp. Basti Bawa Khel, Kapurthala Road, Jalandhar - 144021

119. 9298403 2001/09

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

EpicAgro , Vill. Mohra, G.T. Road, Ambala Cantt.

2001/09

120. 9298504

Butachlor EC

09356

80 Swarup Chemicals (P) Ltd. , G-31 to 35, Upside Industrial Area, Dewa Road, Chinhat , Lucknow.

121. 9298605 2001/08

00694

PVC Insulated Cables

90 Samsun Cables Industries , Begum Pur, Khatola Road, Behram PurVill. , Gurgaon .

2001/07

00366

122. 9298706

Electrical Irons

Allwyn Enterprises (India) , 116 , Industrial Area A, Ludhiana.

2001/07

123, 9298807

00302 02 03

Householdand Similar Elec . Appliances

AllwynEnterprise ( India) , 116, Industrial Area A, Chemma . Chowk , Ludhiana.

2001/09

124. 9298908

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Kothari Beverages Pvt . Ltd. , 68 -B, Udyog Nagar, Kanpur .

125. 9299001 2001/09

00694

PVC Insulated Cables

Shan Aluminium Company , Vill .Kamli Parwanoo , Distt: Solan.

126. 9299102 2001/09

02202 01 99

WoodenFlush Door Shutters

CNC Commercial Ltd. , Vill. Mubarkpur, Teh. Derabassi , Distt: Patiala.

127. 9299203

01659

2001/08

BlockBoards

90 CNC Commercial Ltd. , Vill. Mubarkpur, Teh . Derabassi , Distt.: Patiala.

00303

128. 9299304 2001/09

Plywood forGeneral Purposes

Elite Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. , Timber Market Saharanpur Road, Yamunanagar- 135001 .

1329

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भांग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4 2

2001/09

129. 9299405

Haryana Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. , 33 KM Stone on G.T. Karnal Road, PO Kundli , Distt: Sonepat- 131028 9299506 2001/09

130.

ElitePlywood Industries (P) Ltd., Timber Market, Saharanpur Road, Yamunanagar- 135001 9299607 2001/09

131 .

MetalMoulders , 26 Indl. Ext, Area ,Phase I , Gangyal Jammu 9299708 2001/09

132.

UrmilUdyog, Tanda Road, OPP . Devi Talab Mandir, Jalandhar 9299809 2001/09

133.

M.B.Ploywood Industries (P )Ltd. , P.O. Danpur Rudrapur, Distt. U.S. Nagar

2001/08

92999 10

134.

Guru Amar Industries , D-124, Focal Point , Phase -V, Ludhiana - 141010

2001/09

9300057

135.

Batra Ploywood Industries , VPO Saidpur, Teh. Kharkhoda, Distt. Sonepat

2001/09

93002562

136.

Batra Ploywood Industries (P) Ltd. , VPO Saidpur , Jatola Road, Teh . Kharkhoda , Distt. Sonepat-131001

2001/09

137. 9300259

Asian Industries , 119/6 KM Stone, G.T. Road, Kamal

2001/09

138. 9300360

Pashupati Cement (P) Ltd. , 680/1.3.5 Patanwa , PO Basant Nagar Police Station, Ran Nagar, Distt . Chandauli

2001/09

9300461

139.

Bhatia Industrial Corpn. , Near Kingfisher Vill . Dhulkot Ambala City 9300562 2001/09

140.

Bedi Exports International , C-89 Focal Point Exten. Jalandhar

2001/09

9300663

141.

Traverse Marketing Services 5, Opposite Police Lines , Subash Road , Rohtak- 124001

2001/09

9300764

142.

Bharat Organics , A-2/ 3 UPSIDC Industrial Area, Sandila Hardoi 826 G1/ 04-8

6 5

Wooden Flush Door Shutters 02202 01 99

01659

90 Block Boards

00903

FireHose Delivery Couplings

00278

Galvanized Steel Barred Wire

00303

Plywood For General Purposes

2000

14769

Household Sewing Machine Head

01659

BlockBoards

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

02494 01 94 V. Belts Endles V Belts for Industrial Purposes

01489 01 91 Portland Pozzolana Cement

02082

Stationary Storage Ele . WaterHeater

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

04783

Thiram Seed Dressing 1330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2

6 143. 9300865 2001/08

43Grade OPC

08112

89 Jammu and Kashmir Minerial Ltd. , Wuyan Cement factory, Vill. Wuyan, Distt. Srinagar,

144. 9300966 2001/09

BlockBoards

01659

90 Rajindra Plywood Industries Pvt . Ltd. , Vill . Tumsara, Delhi Mathura Road, Palwal- 121105

145. 9301059 2001/09

04985

2000

Unplasticized PVC Pipes

Navshikha Polypack Industries Pvt.Ltd. , 194 , Udyog Vihar, Phase- I , Gurgaon-

146. 9301160 2001/09

02925

Industrial Safety Helmet

Studs Accessories Ltd. , Plot No. 61 , Sector 27 A, Faridabad(Harayana)

147. 9301260 2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water WorksPurposes

Juneja Metal Works , Vill. Variaría Kapurthala Road , POBasti Guzan, Jalandhar- 144002

148 9301362 2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water Works Purposes

BirValve Industry, G.T. Road Bye Pass Maqsudan , Jalandhar - 144008

149. 9301463 2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water WorksPurposes

Aarko Manufacturing Co. , C-3, Industrial Estate, Jalandhar- 144004

150. 9301564 2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water Works Purposes

Jay ESS Industries , S- 141 Sodal Chowk, Jalandhar-4

151. 9301685 2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water Works Purposes

Sondhi Manufacturing Co. , Canal Road, Outside Industrial Area, Jalandhar- 144001

152. 9301766 2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water WorksPurposes

VarunaEngg . Co. , PreetNagar Road, Industrial Area, Jalandhar- 144004

9301867

153.

2001/09

14846

2000

Sluice Valve For Water WorksPurposes

M.K. Valve Products , E-48 , Focal Point Ext. , Jalandhar

154. 9301968 2001/09

14846

2000

Valve For Water Works Purposes

Sondhi Industries (Regd. ) , Outside Industrial Area, Jalandhar.

155. 9302061 2001/09

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

Chopra Engineering Corpon. , B- 1-821 , Aman Nagar, Jalandhar

156. 9302162 2001/10

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Dinaik Aqaflux (P) Ltd. , NearMajra Road, Sahnewal Octroi , Post Sahnewal Kalan, G.T. Road, Ludhiana [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

157. 9302263 2001/09 ModernMalleables Lamba Pind, Bypass G.T. Road, Jalandhar

158. 9302364 2001/10 Punjab Teak Plywood Industries Vill. , Kami Majra, P.O. Shadipur Khajuri Road, YamunaNagar.

159. 9302465 2001/10 Punjab Teak Plywood Industries Vill . , Kami Majra, P.O. Shadipur Khajuri Road, YamunaNagar.

160. 9302566 2001/10 V. M. Plywood Industries, Shiv Vihar, Sonepat Road, P. O. Sampla Distt. Rohtak .

161. 9302667 2001/10 V. M. Plywood Industries Shiv Vihar, Sonepat Road, P. O. Sampla, Distt . Rohtak.

162. 9302768 2001/10 Aggarwal , Timber Products W 9, Industrial Area YamunaNagar.

9302869

163.

2001/10 SagarHealth Products , Udyog Nagar Banshiwala Vrindaran Mathura .

164. 9302970 2001/10 Hum Pipe Engineers (P) Ltd. , Rampur Devraj Bakshi KaTalab , Sitapur Road, Lucknow.

9303063

165.

2001/10 Punjab Pesticides Industial Coop. SocietyLtd. , Vill. KhanpurDistt. Ropar.

166. 9303164 2001/09 RakenIndustries Ltd. , B -4 Site- 1 Industrial Area, Unnao.

167. 9303265 2001/09 Sigma Cements Ltd. , Vill.Dherowal, P.О. Manjauli, Tehsil Najagarh, Distt. Solan.

168. 9303366 2001/09 Himachal Spun Udyog, Vill . Dherowal, P.O. Manjauli , Teh . Nalagarh, Distt. Solan

1331 5

01879

87 Malleable Cast IronPipe Fittings

01659

BlockBoards

00303

89 Plywood forGeneral, Purposes

BlockBoards

01659

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

00303

89 Plywood for gemneral purposes

14543

98 Packaged Drinking Water

00458

88 Precast Concrete Pipes

08944

78 ChlorpyrifosEC

12818

92 PVC Scareen ans Casing Pipes

OPC 33 Grade

00269

00458

88 Precast Concrete Pipes [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1332

14846

9303-67 2001/09

169.

Sluice Valve for Water Works Purposes

Venus Industries E-57, Industrial Area, Jalandhar- 144004

02082

2001/10

9303568

170

Stationary Storage Ele. WaterHeaters'

Leaders Pumps and Motors , D-1/ 117 Sanjay Colony, Sector 23 , Faridabad

01659

Block boards

9303669 2001/10

171.

Diamond Plywood Industies , VPO Parwalon, Old Saharanpur Road, Jagadhri -135003

00303

2001/10

172. 9303770

Plywood for General Purposes

Diamond Plywood Industies VPO Parwalon, Old Saharanpur Road , Jagadhri

12202 01 99 2001/10

173 930 3871

Glosssary of Terms for Burning Appliances

Century Panels (P) Ltd. , Vill. Ganger, RambaRoad, Taraori Teh. Nilokherin, Distt . Karnal

01783 02 88

Drums, Large Fixed Ends

2001/10

9303972

174.

Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. , Marketing Complex, P.O. Panipat, Refinery V-Bakili , Panipat-132140

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

2001/10

9304065

175.

Manali Food & Beverages Industries , Vill . Bashing, P.O. Babeli, Kullu

00303

2001/10

9304166

176.

Plywood for General Purposes

Koshika Plywood (P) Ltd. , 42Km . Stone Delhi Rohtak Road, P.O. Rohad, Distt. Jhajjar

07098 01 89 2001/09

9304267

177.

Cross linked polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

Skytone Electricals (India) Ltd. , 42&43 IndustrialArea N.I.T. Faridabad- 121001

10001

2001/09

9304368

178.

Constant Speed Compre- ssion Ignition

S. B. Genpower Industries , B-20/1 -B Foundry Nagar, Agra-282006

14846

2001/09

93044669

179.

Sluice Valve for water Works Purposes

BirIndutries G. T. Road Bye Pass Maqsudan, Jalandhar- 144008

01989

2001/10

904570

Leather Safety Boots and Shoes

Estern Industies , 84/14-A Industrial Area, Fazalganj , Kanpur [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

9304671

-181 .

2001/10 Aggarwal Timber Products W-9 Industrial Area, Yamunanagar 182. 9304772 2001/10 AdonisMedical Equipments Pvt. Ltd. , E-70 Phase VIII . Industrial Area, Mohali - 160055

183. 9304873 2001/09 Hind IronFoundry, Railway Road, Batala - 143505 184. 9304974 2001/10 Blending & Packing Plant, Allahabad Unit of Prism C, Vill. , Dhanua Rewa Highway, Naini , 12 Km. from Allahabad, Allahabad

9305067 2001/10

185.

Blending & Packing Plant Allahabad Unit of Prism CE Vill. Dhanua RewaHighway Naini , 12 Km. from Allahabad, Allahabad

186. 9305168 2001/10 Blending & Packing Plant Allahabad Unit of Prism C Vill. Dhanua RewaHighway, Naini , 12 Km. from Allahabad, Allahabad

187. 9305269 2001/10 Saraswati Steel Industies , Vill. Dhurkara, Hissar Road, AmbalaCity

188. 9305370 2001/10 Goyal Aqua & Packages Pvt. Ltd. , 399 Industiral Area, Phase- II Panchkula

189. 9305471 2001/09 E.H. V. Power Cable & Wire Pvt. Ltd. , 1 -C Jind Extension, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu - 180004 190. 9305572 2001/10 Jai Shree Rasayan Udyog Ltd. , VPO Nathupur, Distt. Sonepat

191 . 9305673 2001/10 Hiemens Products Pvt . Ltd. , PlotNo. 14, New DLF Industrial Area, Faridabad- 121003

192. 9305774 2001/10 Swarup Chemicals (P) Ltd. , G-31 to 35 UPSIDC Industrial Area, Dewa Road, Chinhat Lucknow

1333 5

6 BlockBoards

01659

07620 01 86 DiagnosticMedical X-Ray

01729

79 Sand Cast.Iron Spigot and Sockets

53Grade OPC

12269

01489 01 91 Portland Pozzolana Cement

08112

89 43Grade OPC Cement

01341

92 SteelButt Hinges

14543

98 Packaged Drinking

Water

01554 01 88 PVC Insulated (HeavyDuty) ELE

09359

Pesticide Phorate G. Encapsulate

14543

98 Packaged Drinking Water

08944

78 ChlorpyrifosEC [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

1334

00458

Precast Concrete Pipes

2001/10

9305875

193.

Bansal Tubes (RCC) VPO Dehlan Mehatpur, Distt. Una

14543

Packaged Drinking

2001/10

9305976

194.

Bhagwati Pet (India) Pvt . Ltd. , 35/B/22 Model Town, Bareilly-342005

04654

ParaffinWax

9306069 2001/09

195.

Himalayan Petro Products AlliedWorks (P) Ltd. , Lamachaur Haldwani , Distt. Nainital

01659

BlockBoards

9306170 2001/10

196.

JaiBalaji Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. , Jatola Road Vill. Saidpur, Distt . Sonepat

02347

2001/10

9306271

197.

Domestic Pressure Cookers

Bimal Aluminiums (P) Ltd. , 31 -A, Shiv Shankar Nagar , Behind Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Court Road, Jagadhri -135003

01223 03 82

MilkPipettes

2001/10

198. 9306377

Anita Scientific Glass & Plastic Works, 27, Partap Nagar Police Station Road , P.O. Mahesh Nagar, Ambala Cantt-133001

02494 01 94 2001/10

9306473

199.

V. Belts Endless V. Belts forIndl.

Krishna Rubber Enterprises, G. T. Road, Uchani , Kamal-13200

00303

2001/10

9306574

200.

Plywood for General Purposes

Liberty Plywood (P) Ltd. , VPO Vepla Jagadhri Road, Ambala Cantt

01659

BlockBoards

9306675 2001/10

201.

Liberty Plywood (P) Ltd. , VPO Tepla Jagadhri Road, Ambala Cantt

12109

2001/10

202. 9306776

Light duty Sewing Machine

C. R. Auluck & Sons Ltd. , 426 Industrial Area , Ludhiana - 141003

07231

Lastic flushing Cistern

2001/10

9306877

203.

Poly Process Engineers , 131, Indutsrial Area, Phase- I Chandigarh- 160002

14846

2001/10

9306978

204.

Sluice Valve for water works purposes

Leader Valves Ltd. S- 3 , S -4 Industrial Town, Jalandhar

00458

2001/10

Precast Concrete Pipes

205. 9307071

Quality Spun Pipe Factory Vill. Tahil Sahib , P.O. Kartarpur , Distt. Jalandhar

[F. No. CMD-4/ 13: 11 ]

S. K. CHAUDHURI, Dy. Director General [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1335

नई दिल्ली , 17 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 746.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंस धारी का नाम व पता क्रम सं.

लाइसेंस संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह

(1) (2) (3)

(4) 1.

2000/12

9266689

एस.आर. जिन्दल प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज , समीप अग्रसेन चौक पुराना सहारनपुर रोड, जगाधरी 2. 9266790 2000/12

एस.आर. जिन्दल प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज , समीप अग्रसेन चौक पुराना सहारनपुर रोड, जगाधरी 3. 9266891 2000/12

इन्टेल गैस गजेटस ( प्रा ) लि. , गाँव हरिपुर हिन्डन, डेराबस्सी

9266992 2000/12

सालिको ट्रेडिंग कारपो. गाँव हरिपुर हिन्डन बारावाला रोड, डेराबस्सी

9267085 2000/11

एशियनसीमेंट्स 12 इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट एक्स्टें, कठुआ ( जम्मूऔर कश्मीर ) 6 .

2000/12

9267186

जैनको वाल्व्स ( प्रा) लि. , डी-179 फोकल प्वाइंट एक्स्टेंशन जालंधर-144004 7.

9267287 2000/12

अरोड़ा मैलिएबल्स, बैंक साइड ट्रांसपोर्ट नगर, फोकल प्वाइंट जालंधर शहर-144004 8. 9267388 2000/11

च्वायथि इंडस्ट्रीज, ई-48-49 साइट 9 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, उन्नाव

9. 9267489 2000/12

प्रकाश इंडस्ट्रीज, इ-6 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जालंधर-144004 भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

अनु. वर्ष

भामा भाग संख्या

(5)

(6) ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

90 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

03196 01

92 अल्प दाब द्रवणीय गैसों के लिए 5 - लिटर से अधिक जलक्षमता वाले वेल्डित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात के सिलिण्डर भाग 1 एलपीजी सिलिण्डर

03196 01

00455

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट

01879

87 धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

01879

87 धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइपफिटिंग

02202 01

99 लकड़ीके सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतहयुक्त पल्ले

99 धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के 02202 पाइप फिटिंग THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004 / CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1336

(4) (2) (3)

(1)

2000/12

9267590

10.

हरियाणा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज , 33 किमी स्टोन जीटी करनाल रोड, कुण्डली सोनीपत 2000/12

9267691

11.

एस डी टिन एण्ड मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज, खाता नं. 14/17 खसरा नं . 370/199/2/0-9-18 कमोमाजरा मेहलान रोड, संगरूर 148001 9267792 2000/12

12.

च्वायथिइंडस्ट्रीज, ई-48-49 साइट 9 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, उन्नाव

2000/12

9267893

13.

असम प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज , गाँव रायपुर, खजुरी रोड, यमुना नगर

2000/12

9267994

14.

अमित डेकोरेटिव प्लाईवुड, गाँव रामपुर, पोस्ट खरखोडो, (औचन्दी बॉडर्र ) समीप सैदपुर चौक, जिला सोनीपत 2000/12

9268087

15.

पूजा डेकोरेटिव प्लाईवुड, गाँव कामी माजरा पोस्ट शादीपुरा , खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर-135 001 2000/12

9268188

16.

नितिन रबड्स, 152- बी उद्योग नगर कॉ- आप, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, कानपुर 203 022 2000/12

9268289

17.

सुपर इंडस्ट्रीज, मोहल्ला कटकुई समीप दवेश शाह कीदरगाह अमरोहा, जिला जे.पी. नगर 244 221 2000/12

9268390

18.

अनु प्रॉडक्टस लि. , तिगौव रोड पुराना फरीदाबाद 121 001 2000/12

9268491

19 .

अनु प्रॉडक्टस लि. , तिगौव रोड पुराना फरीदाबाद 121 001

सुरेखाकेमीकल्स 2000/12

9268592

20.

सी-18 , 20 और 22 गवर्न. इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट गोरखपुर 273 015

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

(6) (5)

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

-89

00916

चौकोर कनस्तर

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

01680

अल्प एवं मध्य दाब वाले भूमि बॉयलर में उपयोग होने वाले जल के उपचार की रीतिसंहिता

05676

संचकित सख्त रबड़ के तले और एड़ियाँ-विशिष्टि

04246

द्रवीत पेट्रोलियम गैस के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस चूल्हे

09362

ब्यूटाक्लोर दाने

00632

गामा- बीएचसी ( लिन्डेन) ईसी

78 मिथाइल पैराथियॉन भुरकन चूर्ण 08960 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1337

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) (2) (3)'

(4) 21. 9268693 2001/01

अलखनन्दा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, (प्रा) लि. , गाँव राम विहार कॉलोनी, खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर 22. 9268794 2001/04

अलखनन्दा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, (प्रा) लि. , गाँव राम विहार कॉलोनी , खजूरी रोड , यमुना नगर 23. 9268895 2000/12

कृपाल सिंह एण्ड संस, सांगवान चौक, दबाली रोड , सिरसा

24. 9268996 2001/01

सत्यम एप्पलायंसिस.. ए-3824, एस.जी.एम नगर, एमएच -3 एनआईटी, फरीदाबाद 2001/01

25. 9269089

लेह सीमेंट, तारू, लेह लद्दाख 2001/01

26. 9269190

लेहसीमेंट, तारू, लेह लद्दाख 27. 9269291 2000/12

सिधवाल रेफ्रिजरेशन इंडस्ट्रीज , लि. , मन्थापलनहान रोड़, कला अम्ब सिरमौर

28. 9269392 2000/12

फंगीसाइडस इंडिया लि. , लेन नं. 4 , फेस 2, सिडको इंडस्ट्रियल काम्पलेक्स, बारी ब्राह्मण जम्मू

29. 9269493 2001/01

डयूरो पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव माकरा पी ओ लाहंगपुर, जौनपुर

30. 9269594 2001/01

जे.सी.टी.लि. ( स्टील डिवीजन ) , गाँव चोहल , चिन्तपूर्णी रोड़, होशियारपुर जेसीटी लि. ,

31. 9269695 2000/12

बॉमर लॉरी एण्ड कं. लि. , गाँव बहोली, मारकैंटिन कॉम्पलेक्स, पी ओ पानीपत रिफाइनरी, पानीपत

2001/01

32. 9269796

बोंखारा इंडस्ट्रीज, प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. बी-3 , सिधवन इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, रामपुर जौनपुर 33. 9269897 2000/12

लीडर फोर्ज ( इंडिया) प्रा. लि. , ए-१, फोकल प्वाइंट, जालंधर

826G1/04-9

(5)

(6)

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

09020

पावर थ्रेशर

04246

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस चूल्हे

08112

89 43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

00269

89 33 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट्र

01391

कक्ष वातानुकूलन

08291

76 फेनथोएट ई सी

12818

बोर नलकूपों के लिए, अनम्यकृत पीवीसी जाली और आवरक पाइप

03975

केबल रक्षण हेतु मृदु इस्पात के तार फार्मड वायरयुक्त और टेप

03575

बिटुमन ड्रम

00269

89 33ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

00778

जलकल प्रयोजनों के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेकवाल्व [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1338

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

( 2)

(1)

03615

2001/01

34. 9269901

रेफ्रिजरेशन और वातालुकूलन' में प्रयुक्त शब्दावली

धर्म इंजीनियरिंग कम्पनी, जीटी रोड, बटाला 143 505

डाईमिथोएट पायसनीय सांद्र 03903

2000/12

9270074

35.

भारत इन्सेक्टीसाइडस लि. , सी-3 एण्ड 4 , एम आई ई, बहादुरगढ़

02569

2001/01

9270175

36.

मेलाथियोंन जल पायसनीय चूर्ण सांद्र

जय केमीकल्स, 14/1 , मथुरा रोड, फरीदाबाद

১

01489 02

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट

2001/01

9270276

37.

राजस्थान सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , एसआईसीओपी, कथुआ 184 102

03 95

08783 04

2001/01

9270377

38.

निमज्जन मोटरों की बाइंडिंग तार भाग 4 अलग- अलग तारों की विशिष्टि

कृष्णा वायर इन्स्टालेशन, त्रिवेणी कॉम्पलैक्स , गोवर्धन रोड, मथुरा 281 004

13334 01

2000/12

9270478

39.

मलाई युक्त दूध पाउडर भाग 1 मानक ग्रेड

अजन्ता राज प्रोटीन्स लि. , आगरा बाह रोड बीपीओ मानिकपुरा, तहसील बाह आगरा

10325

चौकोर कनस्तर 15 किग्रा/लिटर

9270579 2000/12

40.

सुरभिपैकर्स, खाता नं. 75/141 , खसरा नं . 201 / 1 /एमआईएन/0-16-0 खमोमाजरा मेहलान रोड, संगरूर 148 001

13428

2001/01

9270680

41.

बोतल बन्दप्राकृतिक खनिज जल

जी.सी. बेवरेजिज, प्लॉट नं. 63 , एचपीएसआईडीसी, बद्दी सोलन

09301

2001/01

42. 9270781

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबरमें

अतुल जेनेरेटर्स प्रा.लि. , ननहई इंड. एरिया, आगरा 282 006

09359

कीटनाशक फोरेट जी संपुटित

2001/01

9270882

43.

जय केमीकल्स, 14/1, मथुरा रोड, फरीदाबाद 121 003

2000

14769

घरेलू सिलाई मशीन के हैड

2001/01

9270983

44.

दिब्रिटिश मशीनरी सप्लाईड कम्पनी, 17/ए, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, न्यूटाउनशिप , फरीदाबाद

10748

2001/02

45. 9271076

वेल्डित ट्यूब और पाइपों के लिए तप्त वेल्लित इस्पात पत्तियां

ऐवरी साइकिल इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , फेस 8 फोकल प्वाइंट, चंडीगढ़ रोड, लुधियाना

01659

ब्लॉक बोडर्स

2001/01

9271177

46.

अम्बिका प्लाईवुड इंड. ( प्रा ) लि. , गांव इन्दरपुर, तहसील बिलास पुर, रामपुर [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) ( 2) (3)

(4)

2001/02

47. 9271278

दत्त मेडीप्रॉडक्टस लि. , 53, 54 और 63 रोज-का-मेओ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया सोहना गुड़गाँव

2001/02

48. 9271379

'सी.आर. औलक एण्ड संस लि. , प्लॉट नं. 426 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया लुधियाना 49. 9271480 2001/02

जेमिनी इंडस्ट्रियल कारपो. 270 जी.टी. रोड धनदारी लुधियाना 14101 0 50. 9271581 2001/02

1339 (5)

(6)

04605

क्रेप पट्टी

14769

2000 घरेलू सिलाई मशीन के हैड

14769

2000 घरेलूसिलाई मशीन के हैड

द्रव चालित डोर क्लोजर. 03564

एम्पली हाइड्रोलिक्स

जी-21 फेस 8 इंडस्ट्रियल एंरिया,

मोहाली

51 . 9271682 2001/02

वी. के. इंडस्ट्रीज काटोरतला रोड, काशीपुर जिला: यू.एस. नगर-244 713 52. 9271783 2001/01

असन्दोत्रा सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज इंडस्ट्रियल एक्सटेंशन एरिया कथुआ (जे और के ) 53. 9271884 2001/02

टेन्टीवल वायर प्रॉडटक्स लि. , राधे श्याम कॉलोनी दिल्ली मसानीं रोड मथुरा

54. 9271985 2001/02

ब्ल्यूबर्ड एप्पलांयसेस प्रा. लि. 3 एफ/09 प्रथम तल वी.पी.एन.आई.टी. , फरीदाबाद 55. 9472078 2001/02

वल्लभस्टील्स लि. , जी.टी. रोड, गॉव नन्दपुर सहनेवाल, लुधियाना-141 120 56. 9272179 2001/02

सुरजीत स्टील इंडस्ट्रीज डी-130 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेज-7, सास नगर मोहाली

57. 9272280 2001/03

हिन्दुस्तान वायर्स लि. , 267-268 सेक्टर 24, फरीदाबाद

0953703 83

विद्युत संस्थापन के लिए कंडयूट भाग 3 कंडयूट विद्युत रोधक सामग्री के लिए दृढ़ सांद्र कंडयूट

08112

89 43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

08783 04 03 95 निमज्जन मोटरों की बाइंडिंग तार भाग 4 अलग-अलग तारों की विशिष्टि

04246

92 द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस चूल्हे

03601

यांत्रिक और सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए इस्पात के पाइप

01-

02713

शिरोपरि पावर लाइनों के लिए इस्पात के गोल खम्बे

03601

92 अल्पदाब द्रवणीय गैसों के लिए 5 - लिटर से अधिक जल क्षमता वाले वेल्डित अल्पकार्बन इस्पात सिलिंडर भाग 1 एलपीजी सिलिंडर 1340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004 /CHAITRA 7 , 1926

(4) (3)

(1) ( 2)

2001/02

9272381

58 .

विनर इंडस्ट्रीज, 3761 एमजीएफ संजय कॉलीनी 33 फीट रोड, सेक्टर 23 , फरीदाबाद

2001/02

9272482

59.

गैलेक्सीप्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

2001/02

9472583

60.

गैलेक्सी प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

2001/02

9272684

61 .

ड्यूरेबल कंडक्टर्स, गाँव काथा, पीओ बद्दी सोलन

2001/02

9272785

62.

ड्यूरेबल कंडक्टर्स, गाँव काथा, पीओ बद्दी, सोलन-173 205 2001/02

9272886

63 .

हरीसर इंडस्ट्रियल कारपो. सी-155 फोकल प्वाइंट 5, लुधियाना

2001/02

9272987

64.

हरीसर इंडस्ट्रियल कारपो. यसी-155 फोकल प्वाइंट 5 , लुधियाना

2001/02

9273080

65.

किटप्लाई इंडस्ट्रीज लि. शाहबाद रोड पी ओ रामपुर-244 901 2001/03

9273181

66 .

माउंट ऐवरेस्ट मिनरल वॉटर लिमिटेड वीपीओ धौला कुँआ, तह पोंटा साहिब सिरमौर 2001/01

9273282

67.

अनुप्रॉडक्टस लि, तिगाँव रोड, पुराना फरीदाबाद-121 002 2001/03

9273383

68 .

सोनालिका एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज कारपो . गाँव चाक गुजरां जालंधर रोड, होशियारपुर-146 002

2001/02

6 . 9273484

अमरसीमेंट्स एसआईसीओपी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, हातली मोरे कठुआ ( जम्मूकश्मीर )

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

(6) (5)

01709

बिलली के पंखो की मोटर

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

00303

साथाम्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

00398

शिरीपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक भाग 4. एल्युमीनियम मिश्रधातु के लड़दार बालक ( एन्युमी-मैग्नी- सिलिकॉन टाइप)

0030

शिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

13428

बोतल बन्द प्राकृतिक खनिज जल

13513

2, 4- डी इथाइल ईस्टर दानेदार

09020

पावर थ्रेशर

08112

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1341

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(4) (1) (2) (3)

2001/03

70. 9273585

सचिम्दरः इलैक्ट्रिक इंडिया लि. , 10, डीएलएफ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 2 , फरीदाबाद 2001/03

71. 9273686

प्रीत स्टोव उद्योग, गाँव गुल्लरवालासाई रोड, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, पी.ओ. कुधवाडा, बद्दी 72. 9273787 2001/03

बी.एल. साइंटिफिक इंस्ट्रूमेंटस कम्पनी, 6268/43 अहाता हरि प्रसाद निकोल्सन रोड, अम्बाला कैंट-133001 2001/02

73, 9273888

जय केमीकल्स, 14/1 , मथुरा रोड, फरीदाबाद 2001/03

74. 9273989

सुदर्शन डोर्स प्रा.लि., विसायकपुर रनिया कानपुर देहात 2001/03

75. 9274082

नवरंग मैन्यूफेक्चरिंग कारपो. 163 शेरपुर रोड बाईपास, लुधियाना-141010 2001/03

76. 9274183

शिवालिकसीमेंट इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट बैटल बल्लियन, उधमपुर ( जम्मु और कश्मीर ) 2001/03

9274284

77.

गेटस इंडिया प्रा. लि. , गाँव सरसिनी अम्बाला चंडीगढ़ हाइवे पी.आ. लालरू, लालरू 2001/02

9274385

78 .

गेटस इंडिया प्रा. लि. , गाँव सरसिनी अम्बाला चंडीगढ़ हाइवे पी.ओ. लालरू, लालारू 79.

2001/03

9274486

एन. के. इंटरप्राइसिस , गाँध प्रीतमपुरा रोड, बडमलिक पी.ओ. पी.एस. राई सौनीपत 80. 9274587 2001/03

एमएलए इंटरनेशनल डी-105 फोकल प्वाइंट एस्सटेंशन, जालंधर

2001/03

9274688

81 .

रघुनाथ रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज, दुखेरी रोड, गाँव मोहरा , अम्बाला कैंट 2001/03

9274789

82.

नॉर्दर्न इंडिया केमीकल इंडस्ट्रीज 182/79 इंड. एरिया, फेस 1 , चंडीगढ़

(5)

(6)

08828

96 विद्युत सहायक अंग- घरेलू और ऐसे ही संस्थाको के लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

04246

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलूगैस चूल्हे

03686

66 विद्यार्थियों हेतु प्रयोग टाइप सूक्ष्मदर्शी :

69 डायकोफोयल पायसनीय सांद्र 05279

00710

76 समुद्री उपयोग हेतु प्लाईवुड

2000

14769

घरेलूसिचाई मशीन हैड

08112

43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

00444

87 सामान्य प्रयोजन जल के लिए रबड़ के होज़

00447

वेल्डिंगके लिए रबड़ के होज़

02494

V- पट्टे औद्योगिक प्रयोजन के लिए निरन्ज V- पट्टे भाग-1 सामान्य प्रयोजन

01879

धातुवर्ध्यढलवां लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग की विशिष्टि

00447

वेलिंग के लिए रबड़ के होज़

08249

जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाईड्रेट कृषिग्रेड 1342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926,

(4) ( 1) ( 2)

9274890

83.

रामा इंडस्ट्रीज लि. गाँव चोण्धरी पी ओ दापपर, तह राजपुरा , अम्बाला चण्डीगढ़ हाइवे जिला पटियाला 140 506

2001/03

9274991

84.

रैक्स सीविंग मशीन कं. ( प्रा. , ) लि. , 245, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया ए लुधियाना 141 003

2001/03

9275084

85.

सिंगर इंडिया लि. , लेन नं. 4 , सिडको इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बारीब्राह्मण; जम्मू 181 133 86. 9275185 2001/03

चेतन सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज, एसआईसीओपी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, हाटलीमोरे कठुआ ( जे एण्ड के )

2001/03

9275286

87 .

भवानी इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा . लि. , गाँव अन्जली बैकसाइड फोकल प्वांइट, जी टी रोड मण्डी गोबिन्दगढ़ , जिला फतेहगढ़ साहिब 9275387 2001/03

88.

भवानी इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , गाँव अन्जली बैकसाइड फोकल प्वांइट, जी टी रोड मण्डी गोबिन्दगढ़ , जिला फतेहगढ़ साहिब

2001/03

9275488

89 .

सूर्या टाइल्स एण्ड पेवर्स प्लाट न. 280 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, पंचकूला

2001/03

9275589

90.

सूर्या टाइल्स एण्ड पेवर्स प्लाट न. 280, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, पंचकूला

2001/03

9275690

91.

स्टार प्लाईबोर्डस लि., गाँव गधौली समीप तेजली स्पोर्टस कॉम्पलैक्स, यमुनानगर

2001/03

9275791

92.

अजय प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , जगाधरी जिला यमुना नगर

2001/03

9275892

93.

भाम्बरी स्टील्स प्रा. लि. , . अम्लोह रोड मण्डी गोबिन्दगढ़ , गाँव तूरान, जिला फतेहगढ़ साहिब 143 701

2001/03

94. 9275993

शालीमार पैट्रो प्रॉडक्टस प्रा. लि. , नन्दगाँव रोड, गाँव बारहनाकोसी कला, मथुरा

[PART II SBC . 3 ( ii) ]

(6) (5)

05719

70 खाद्य ग्रेड जिलेटिन

;

2000

14769

घरेलू सिलाई मशीन हैड़

2000

14769

घरेलूसिलाई मशीन हैड

08112

43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड

सीमेंट

10748

वेल्डित ट्यूब और पाइपों के लिए तप्तवेल्लित इस्पात पत्तियाँ

01239

मृदु इस्पात की नालियाँ नलिकाकार सामग्रियाँ तथा पिटवां इस्पात की अन्य फिटिंग

01237

सीमेंट कंक्रीट की फर्श बिछाने वाली टाइलें

13801

सीमेंट कंक्रीट की टाइलें

01328

परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

01328

परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

02062

सामान्य संरचना इस्पात

01838

कंक्रीट की पटरियाँ एवं संरचनाओं में विस्तार जोड़ों के पूर्व निर्मित पूरकों ( अनिष्कासित एवं लचीले टाइप ) भाग-1 डामर मिले रेशे [ भाग II- खण्ड. 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

1343 (1) (2) (3)

(4)

(5)

(6) 95.

2001/03

9276086

02347

घरेलू प्रेशर कूकर

95 सिद्धार्थ इंडस्ट्रीज, प्लॉट नं. ई-30 इंडस्ट्रियल फोकल प्वाइंट, होशियारपुर 146 001

96 . 9276187 2001/03

08249

जिंक सल्फेट, हैप्टाहाइड्रेट,

कृषिग्रेड

" श्री राम फर्टिलाइजर्स मैन्यू. कं. , 94 सी-58 फोकल प्वाइंट कोटकपूरा 151 204.

97.

2001/03

9276288

08249

जिंक सल्फेट, हैप्टाहाइड्रेट, कृषिग्रेड

श्री राम क्रोप केमीकल प्रा. लि. , गुदरगाँधी रोड गुरू हर सहाई, जिला फिरोजपुर

98. 9276289 2001/03

14769

घरेलूसिलाई मशीन हैड

2000 निपकोइंटरनेशनल्स, 2, गैसपुरा रोड़, पीओ धनधारी कलाँ लुधियाना :

99. 9276290 2001/03

13428

भोतल बन्दप्राकृतिक खनिज जल

डी. एस . फूडस लि. , गाँव रायसन जिला कुल्लू(हि प्र. )

100.

2001/03

9276591

08828

परफेक्ट इलैक्ट्रो कंट्रोल्स , बस्ती बावा खेल कपूरथला रोड , जालंधर 144021

विद्युत सहायक अंग- घरेलू और ऐसे ही संस्थयकोंके लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

2001/03

101. 9276692

ब्लाक बोर्ड

01659

90 विधाता सीमेंट कं . प्रा..लि. , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया सी जसपाल बंग्रान रोड आउटसाइड आँक्टरायकंगनवाल, लुधियाना

102. 9276793 2001/03

सामान्यप्रयोजन हेतु प्लार्जवुड 00303

विधावा सीमेंट कं. प्रा. लि. , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया सी जसपाल बंग्रान रोड आउटसाइड आँक्टरायकंगनवाल, लुधियाना

103. 9276894 2001/03

01 88

01554

आनन्द इलैक्ट्रोलैब केबल्स प्रा. लि. , 54 किमीस्टोन जी टी रोड भिगान , सोनीपत

पी वी सी रोधिङ्ग ( भारी कार्य ) बिजली की केबल भाग 1 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टताके लिए

104. 9276995 2001/03

04246

द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैसों के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू गैस चूल्हे

जे. के. एप्पलायंसेस गाँव दाँन समीप मिर्वा एकेडमी तहसील खराड जिला रोपड़

105. 9277088 2001/03

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

परफेक्ट एग्रो सिल्स प्रा. लि. , मिलनपुर रोड , वी पी ओ हमब्रान्ड , जिला लुधियाना

106. 9277189 2001/02

14769

2000

बरेलूसिलाई मशीन हैड

रीटा मशीन्स ( इंडिया ) लि. , 416, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया " ए " लुधियाना [PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ) 1344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2001/03

9277290

107.

电路了す

परफेक्ट एग्रो मिल्स प्रा. लि., मिलनपुर रोड, वी पी ओ हमब्रान्ड जिला लुधियाना

00780.

2001/03

9277391

108.

जलकल प्रमोचन के लिए स्मूस बाल्व ( साइज 50 से 200 मिमी तक

सोंधी मैन्यूफेक्बरिंग कं. , आउटसाइड इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , जालंधर शहर 144001

02494

2001/03

9277492

109.

V-पट्टे औद्योगिक प्रयोजन के लिए मिराज पट्टे

*भाग सामान्य प्रयोजन

सतराज प्रा. लि. , सी-90 फेस 7 इंड. एरिया मोहाली

00778

2001/03

9277593

110.

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेठग्लोब और विक वाल्व

ए. के. टूल्स इंडस्ट्रीज एम-33 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जालंधर

04323

इंडोसल्फान ई सी

2001/03

9277694

111.

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा. ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहसील नाहन जिला सिरमौर

01061

2001/03

9277795

112.

फिनीलिके टाईप रोगाणुनाशक प्रवाह

रूप इंटरप्राइजिज, 184/74 इंड. एरिया, फेस 1 , चण्डीगढ़

00458

2001/03

9277896

113.

पूर्व ढलित कैंकरीट पाइप ( प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

बीर सैन आनन्द एण्ड कं. प्रा. लि. , लेन नं. 5.फेस 2 सिडको इंड. कॉम्पलेक्स, बारी- ब्रह्मण, जम्मू

01328

परंतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

2001/03

9277997

114.

विद्या प्लाई एण्ड बोर्ड प्रा. लि. , गाँव लालपुर पोस्ट डडरौल जलालाबाद रोड, शाहजहाँपुर 242001

2000

14769

घरेलूसिलाई मशीन हैड

पूजा मशीन्स प्रा. लि. ,

2001/03

9278090

115.

वीपीओ हरयाल ,

पठानकोट 145001

11997

फेनवेलरेट ई सी

2001/03

116. 9278191

शिवालिक एग्रो केमीकल्स बी-59 फेस 7 सास नगर

10319

ईथियॉन ई सी

2001/03

9278292

117.

शिवालिक एग्रो केमीकल्स बी-59 फेस 7 सास नगर

13779

2001/03

9278393

118.

एसी स्थैत्तिक वाट घंटा मीटर वर्ग -1 और 2..

सराफ इंडस्ट्रीज, भटिण्डा रोड रामपुरा फुल, जिला भटिण्डा 151103

13779

2001/03

119. 9278494

एसी स्थैतिक वाट घंटा मीटर वर्ग 1 और 2

प्रेसिजन मीटर्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , बारवाला रोड गाँव माधोपुर डेराबस्सी, जिला पटियाला 140507

05346

2001/03

9278595

120.

संश्लिष्ट खाद्य रंग निमित्तियाँ और मिश्रण

विद्या डाई केम. इंडस्ट्रीज , 1891 , मॉडर्न इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, बहादुरगढ़ 124507 [ भाग-II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

(1) (2) (3)

(4) 121. 9278696 2001/03

शिवालिक केमीकल्स प्रा. लि. , 349 फेज 2 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , चंडीगढ़

122. 9278797 2001/04

ए.एस. मेटल स्टील वर्क्स , राम नगर जालंधर 144008 123. 9278803 2001/04

जगोटा मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज, ई-59 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जालंधर

2001/04

124. 9278902

वरूणी इंडस्ट्रीज 32आनन्द पुरी बसन्त विहार, लुधियाना

125. 9279092 2001/04

करनाल सिंगलामोटर्स, 5 किमी मील पत्थर कैथल रोड, 126. 9279193 2001/04

एग्रोस्टील कास्टिंग, 419, एचएसआईडीसी आफिस के पीछे इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, यमुना नगर 135001 127. 9279294 2001/04

सेफैक्स केमीकल्स इंडिया लि. , ए-2, एमआईई दिल्ली रोहतक रोड, बहादुरगढ़ 124057 128. 9279395 2001/04

रामा रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज , 291, उमरान रनिया, कानपुर देहात

129. 9279496 2001/04

जी.सी. जैन इंजी वर्क्स दाबा रोड, जी टी रोड लुधियाना 130. 9279597 2001/03

गोल्ड मोहर फूड्स एण्ड फीड्स लि. , फोकल प्वाइंट धाकन्सूरोड, राजपुरा , जिला पटियाला 140 501 131. 9279601 2001/04

दीपक फास्टनर्स लि. , ई 535 से 538-555 फेस 6 फोकल प्वाइंट, लुधियाना 132. 9279702 2001/04

दीपक फास्टनर्स लि. , ई 535 से 538-555 फेस 6 फोकल प्वाइंट, लुधियाना 133. 9279803 2001/04

सुप्रीम सर्जिकल्स, रोहतक सोनीपत रोड, बोहर, रोहतक 124 023 826 G1/04-10

1345 (5)

(6 )

08249

94 जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाइड्रेट, कृषिग्रेड

जल सेवा फेरूल

02692

00778

84 जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और बैंक वाल्व

14769

घरेलू सिलाई मशीन हैड

2000

09079

89 कृषि कार्यों के लिए साफ, ठण्डे पानी के मोनोसैट पम्प

02202 01 99 लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतहयुक्त पल्ले

ब्यूटाक्लोर ई सी

09356

02494

94 V- पट्टे औद्योगिक प्रयोजन के लिए निरन्ज V- पट्टे भाग 1 सामान्य प्रयोजन

14769

2000 घरेलू सिलाई मशीन हैड

79 पशुओं के लिए मिश्रित आहार 02052

01363

01 92 उत्पाद ग्रेड " सी " के लिए षट्कोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबलें, पेंच और ढिबरियां भाग 1 षट- कोणीय शीर्ष वाले काबले (साइज रेंज एम 5 से एम 64तक)

88 प्रेषण टावर काबले

12427

00863

88 हथकरघे का सूती निर्जर्मित पट्टी कपड़ा [PART li-SEC . 3 ( i )) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004 / CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1346

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

00778

2001/04

9279904

134.

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेक वाल्व

आर. आर. मेटल वर्क्स 78, ग्लोबकॉलोनी, जालंधर

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/04

9280077

135.

आर. जी. प्रॉडक्टस , सम्मुख: आईटीआई चांदपुर यमुनानगर 135 001

01679

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2001/04

9280178

136 .

आर. जी. प्रॉडक्टस, सम्मुख: आईटीआई चांदपुर यमुनानगर 135 001

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2001/03

9280279

137.

अमित डेकोरेटिव प्लाईवुड गाँव रामपुर पीओ खरखोडा (औचण्डी बार्डर ) समीप सैदपुर चौक जिला सोनीपत

03104

हाइड्रोमीटर

2001/04

9280380

138 .

नरिन्दर साइंटिफक इंडस्ट्रीज , 2773/18 टिम्बर मार्केट, अम्बाला कैंट 133 001

13753

9280481 2001/03

139.

जल अवशोषण

वाली डस्ट प्रेस्ड

सिरेमिक टाइलें

एसपीएल लि. , कस्सार जिला झज्जर (हरियाणा ) 124507

01239

9280582 2001/04

140.

सदाशिव स्ट्रक्चरल ( प्रा ) लि. , पण्डवाला रोड मुबारिकपुर, डेरा बस्सी, जिला पटियाला

09079

2001/05

9280683

141.

कृषि कार्यों के लिए साफ, ठण्डे पानी के मोनोसैट पम्प

आसवाल इलैक्ट्रिकल्स ( पम्पस ) 71/3 मील पत्थर जी टी रोड, करनाल

04381

रोग निदान हेतु सूक्ष्मदर्शी

2001/04

142. 9280784

रेडिकल्स इन्स्ट्रूमेंटस, 123, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, अम्बाला कैंट

00513

2001/03

9280885

143.

अतप्त बेल्लित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात की चद्दरें और पत्तियाँ

हंसा ट्यूब्स लि. , हबितपुर रोड, डेराबस्सी, जिला पटियाला

02202

2001/04

9280996

144.

गोल्डन प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज ( प्रा ) लि. , मुल्लानपुर, रोड, बीपीओ हम्ब्रान, जिला लुधियाना

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतहयुक्त पल्ले

08249

2001/05

145. 9281079

जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाइड्रेट, कृषिग्रेड

बालाजी इंडस्ट्रीज, सी. - 3 ए, फोकल प्वाइंट, कोटकपुरा

13779

2001/05

9281180

146 .

ए सी स्थैतिक वाट घंटा मीटर वर्ग 1 और 2

एवॉन मीटर्स प्रा. लि. , डी. - 15 इंडस्ट्रियल फोकल प्वाइंट, डेराबस्सी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1) ( 2) (3)

(4) 147. 9281281 2001/04

बायस्वर स्पन पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव बरिया (मोतीनगर ) , पीओ बुधेरा , जिला बाराबंकी 148. 9281382 2001/03

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

1347 (5)

(6)

00458

88 पूर्व दलित कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट 01489

श्रीनाथ इंडस्ट्रीज,

36, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, कठुआ

>

149. 9281483 2001/03

इंडोसल्फान ई सी

04323

क्रिस्टल फॉसफेटस लि. ,

गाँव नत्थुपुर,

जिलासोनीपत

150.

2001/04

9281584

04381

67 रोग निदान हेतु सूक्ष्मदर्शी

सुधीर साइंटिफिक वर्क्स,

1265 बंगाली मोहल्ला,

अम्बाला कैंट

151. 9281685 2001/04

02568

78 मैलाथियॉन भुरकन पाउडर

सुरेकाकेमीकल्स

सी-18, 20 और 22 गवर्नमेंट

इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट,

गोरखपुर-273015

2001/04

152. 9281786

शोभित मेलिएबल्स. ए-25 इंडे. एस्टेट, जालंधर-144 004 2001/04

153. 9281887

01879

धातुवर्ध्यढलवां लोहे के ५ प फिटिंग की विशिष्टि

00778

राजन मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज

एम-35 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया ,

जालंधर

154. 9281988 2001/05

जुनेजा मेटल वर्क्स, गाँव वरियाना कपूरथला रोड, पीओ बस्ती गुजा, जालंधर 155. 9282081 2001/04

साहनी स्ट्रिप्स एण्ड वायर्स प्रा. लि. रथदाणा रोड अकबापुर बरोता , जिलासोनीपत 156. 9282182 2001/04

पी.आर. मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज , 140 ई फोकल प्वाइंट , फेस 4, लुधियाना 2001/04

157. 9282283

ईफोर्टस रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज , मेन मार्किट सम्मुख: यूको बैंक, कलनपुर (रोहतक) 158. 9282384 2001/05

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेक वाल्व

00778

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेक वाल्व

00280

सामान्य इंजीनियरिंग प्रयोजनों के लिए मृदु इस्पात के तार

00778

84 जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब और चेक वाल्व

05382

85 टूथ पाउडर

00277

92 जस्तीकृत इस्पात की चद्दरें (सादी तथा नलिकाकार )

हंसा मेटलिक्स लि,

गाँव सुमलहेरि लालरू,

जिला पटियाला

2001/05

159. 9282485

गीता इंडस्ट्रीज, मुकर्जीपार्क जगाधरी , जिला यमुना नगर 160. 9282586 2001/05

सदाशिव स्ट्रक्चरल्स प्रा. लि. , पंडवाला रोड मुबारिकपुर डेराबस्सी, जिला पटियाला

08462

77 निर्जर्मक सुवाह्य अर्ध्व दाब टाइप

01161

संरचनात्मक उपयोग के लिए इस्पात के पाइप THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1348

(4) (3)

(1) (2)

2001/05

9282687

161.

श्री आर. इंटरनेशनल 47/50फर्स्ट फ्लोर जनरल, गंज कानपुर

2001/05

9282788

162.

अजन्ता फीड इंडस्ट्रीज जिला लुधियाना समीप गाइब दी पल्ली जी. टी. रोड़, खन्ना 2001/05

163. 9282889

स्काईटोन इलैक्ट्रिकल्स ( इंडिया ) लि. , 42और 43 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, एनआईटी फरीदाबाद 2001/05

9282990

164.

प्रतीक एक्टूजन प्रा. लि. , 401 , फेस 4, उद्योग विहार, गुड़गाँव

2001/05

9283083

165.

रोहित इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स आउटसाइड भगत सिंह नगर, जी. टी. रोड बाईपास जालंधर 2001/05

9283184

166.

हरियाणा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. 33किमी. स्टोन जी टी करनाल रोड, पीओ कुण्डलीसोनीपत 2001/05

9283285

167.

किसान केमीकल एण्ड फर्टिलाइजर्स, कोटली रोड, कुकतसर-152 026 2001/05

9283386

168.

बजाज होम प्रॉडक्टस , जी.टी. रोड़, फतेहबाद 2001/05

169. 9283487

के सन्स इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा.लि., एसएच -15/79 - ए शिवपुर, वाराणसी

2001/05

170. 9283588

विनकेम पेन्ट्स (प्रा. ) लि. , समीप पीसीपीएल-भानकेर पुर, तह. डेराबस्सी मुबारिकपुर रोड़, जिला पटियाला -140 201 2001/05

171. 9283689

क्वालिटी पम्प्स प्रा. लि. , 95-ए दादा नगर, कानपुरः 2001/05

172. 9283790

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

(6) (5)

94 संश्लिष्टखाद्य रंग निमित्तियाँ 05346 औरमिश्रण

02052

पशुओं के लिए मिश्रत आहार

07098

अनुप्रस्थ जुड़े हुए पॉलि- इथाईलीन विद्युतरोधी ताप स्थापी ढके केबल

09537

00778

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए ताँबा मिश्रधातु के गेट ग्लोब

और चेक वाल्व

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

08249

जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाइड्रेट, कृषि ग्रेड

01011

बिस्कुट

02 81

09537

विद्युत संस्थापन के लिए कंड्यूट भाग 2

05410

सीमेंट रंग रोगन

14104

गहसई से पानी निकालने के हथबरमें घटक- नाइट्राइल रबड़

00455

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट

न्यूसेन्चुरी सीमेंट कम्पनी,

ग्रामीण फोकल प्वाइंट, गाँव पथराला

जिला भटिण्डां

2001/05

173. 9283891

हरियाणा एग्रो फर्टिलाइजर्स एण्ड केमीकल्स जी.टी. रोड, शांहबाद मार्कण्डा-136 135 2001/05

9283992

174.

हरियाणा एग्रो फर्टिलाइजर्स एण्ड केमीकल्स जी. टी. रोड, शाहबाद मार्कण्डा-136 135

13403

कीटनाशक- एनिलोफास ईसी

09356

ब्यूटाक्लोर पायसनीय सांद्र [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1349

तका रामपत्रः मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र. 7, 1926

(1) (2) (3)

(4) 175.

2001/05

9284085

कृष्णा कृष्णा ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , शॉप नं. 112 पुराना कोर्ट रोड, पानीपत 132: 103 176. 9284186 2001/05

एस एस के कं. लि. , फैक्टरी एरिया पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 6, कपूरथला 144601 177. 9284287 2001/05

इंडिया पेस्टीसाइड्स लि. , ई-18 से 23 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, देवा रोड चिन्हात लखनऊ

9284388 2001/05

178.

इंडिया पेस्टीसाइड्स लि. , ई-18से 23 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , देवा रोड चिन्हात, लखनऊ

2001/05

179. 9284489

स्टैण्डर्ड रबड़ रबड़ मिल्स खाण्डसा रोड, गुड़गाँव-122001 2001/05

180. 9284590

डायकिन श्रीराम एअर कंडीशनिंग प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. 14, सेक्टर 14, फरीदाबाद -121004 181. 9284691 2001/05

क्रिस्टल फॉसफेट लि. , जी. टी. करनाल रोड, वीपीओ नत्थूपुर जिलासोनीपत 182. 9284792 2001/05 ...पी. एन. सेफटेक प्रा. लि. , ई-4गवर्न. इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, तालकटोरा रोड, लखनऊ-2261 183.

2001/05

9284893

हरियाणा वुड प्रॉडक्ट्स, गाँव मकराबपुर, छछरोली रोड जगाधरी , जिला यमुना नगर 184. 9284994 2001/05

जसप्रीत फाउण्ड्री, गुरदासपुररोड, गाँव कुतबी नाँगल, बटाला 143 501 185. 9285087 2001/05

साम केबल एण्ड कंडक्टर्स ( प्रा. ) लि. गाँव शिमला पिस्तोर पीओ लालपुर

6 किमी रूद्रपुर- किछा रोड, रूद्रपुर जिला यू एस नगर (5)

01417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषाकाशिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहसंकन

90 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी 00694. वोल्टत्ता के लिए पीवीसीःरोधित केबल

03901

75 जिराम डब्ल्यूडीपी

11010

84 जिराम कोलोइडल संस्पेंशन

10908

द्रवित पैट्रोनियम गैस के लिए रबड़ की नम्य ट्यूब

01391

92 कक्ष वातानुकूलक

08249

94 जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाइड्रेट, कृषि ग्रेड

02925

औद्योगिक सुरक्षा हेलमेट

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

07181

86 जल, गैस, सीवर के लिए क्षैतिज ढले लोहे के दोहरे फ्लैंज युक्त पाइप

07098

01 88 , अनुप्रस्थ जुड़े हुए पॉलिइथाईलीन विद्युतरोधी ताप स्थापी ढके केबल 1350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

( 2) (3)

(4) (1)

2001/06

186. 9285188

श्रीराम एग्रो बग्रियन रोड, वी बार्डवाल धुरी 148 024 9285289 2001/05

187.

श्री गणेश ज्वेलर्स लि. , फर्स्ट माल दि माल, लुधियाना

188. 9285390 2001/06

सा टिम्बर ट्रेडर्स गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

2001/06

189. 9285491

साटिम्बर ट्रेडर्स गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

2001/06

190. 9285592

मेट्रो प्लाईवुड ( प्रा ) लि. , एट एण्ड पीओ डामला दिल्लीरोड, यमुना नगर 135 001 2001/06

191. 9285693

मेट्रो प्लाईवुड ( प्रा) लि. , एट एण्ड पीओ डामला दिल्लीरोड, यमुना नगर 135 001 2001/05

192. 9285794

मतीब इलैक्ट्रिकल इंडस्ट्रीज 19 बी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट बारजुलस संत नगर 190005 2001/05

193. 9285895

सीआईसीओ टैक्नालोजिज लि., 3किमी बसई रोड गुड़गाँव

2001/06

194. 9285996

सुधीर साइंटिफिक वर्क्स, 1265 बंगाली मोहल्ला अम्बाला कैंट 2001/05

195. 9286089

हिन्दुस्तान सेफ्टी ग्लास वर्क्स, बम्बरौली इलाहाबाद 211 012 2001/06

196. 9286190

गुजरात अम्बुजा सीमेंट लि. , समीप गुरू नानक देव थर्मल प्लांट मलौट रोड, भटिंडा 151 005 197. 9286291 2001/06

सुन्दर लाल मोहिन्दर पाल जैन, सदर बाजार, भटिंडा

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] (5)

(6)

08249

जिंक सल्फेट हैप्टाहाइड्रेट, कृषिग्रेड

01417

99 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

90 ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

90 ब्लॉक बोर्ड

00303

89 सामान्यप्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड.

02082

93 बिजली के पानी गर्म करने के भंडारण किस्म के स्थिरहीटर

02645

75 जल सह कार्य यौगिक

08275

सूक्ष्मदर्शी के लिए द्विनेत्रीकाएं

03438

94 सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए रजलिंत काँच के दर्पण

91 पोर्टलैंड पोजोला । सीमेंट 01489

0141 ;

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

(1) ( 2) (3.)

(4) 198. 9286392 2001/05

भारत रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहसील नाहन, जिला सिरमौर 173 030 199. 9286493 2001/05

भारत. रसायन एग्रो ( प्रा ) लि. , त्रिलोकपुर रोड कला अम्ब, तहसील नाहन जिला सिरमौर 173 030 200. 9286594 2001/06

गुजरात अम्बुजा सीमेंट लि. , समीप गुरु नानक देव थर्मल प्लांट, मलौट रोड, भटिंडा 151 005

1351 (5)

(6)

08074

मोनोक्रोटोफास एस एल

90 साइपरमेथ्रीन ई.सी

12016

12269

87 53ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

[संदर्भ: सीएमडी-1 /13 :11 ] एस. के. चौधरी , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 17th March , 2004

S.O. 746. In pursuance of sub -regulation (5 ) of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE Licence

Sl . No. No.

Name and Aderess oftheParty

Operative Date (Year/Month)

1: 2

1. 9266689 2000/12

S. R. Jindal, Plywood Industries Near Aggrasan Chowk , Old Saharanpur Road, Jagadhri

2. 9266790 2000/12

S. R. Jindal , Plywood Industries NearAggrasen Chowk, Old Saharanpur Road, Jagadhri

3. 9266891 2000/12

Intel, Gas-Gadgets (P) Ltd. , Vill. Haripur Hindan Dera Bassi

4. 9266992 2000/12

Salico Trading Corpn . Vill. Haripur Hindan Barwala Road , Dera Bassi 5. 9267085 2000/11

Asian Cements 12, Industrial Estate Extn. , Kathua ( J & K) 6. 9267186 2000/12

Jainco Valves (P) Ltd. , D-179, Focal Point Extension , Jalandhar- 144004

IS No. Part Sec . Year Title ofthe Standard

Block Boards

01659

00303

89 Plywood for General purposes

03196 01

92 Welded Low Carbon Steel Cylinders.

03196 01

WeldedLow Carbon Steel Cylinders

00455

89 Portland Slag Cement

01879

87 Mallearble Cast IronPipe Fittings 1352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1 2

Arora Malleabrles 2000/12

7. 9267286

Back side Transport Nagar, FocalPoint Jalandhar City- 144004 2000/11

8. 9267388

Choithi Industries E-48-49, Site 9, IndustrialArea, Unnao

2000/12

9. 9267489

Parkash Industries E-6, Industrial Area, Jalandhar- 144004 10. 9267590 2000/12

Haryana Plywood Industries 33 Km StoneGT Karnal Road , Kundli Sonepat 11. 9267691 2000/12

Ess Dee Tin and Metal Industries, Khata No. 14/17

KhasrasNo : 370/199/2/0-9-18

Kamomajra Mehlan Road, Sangrur- 148001

Choithi Industries. 2000/12

12. 9267792

3-48-49 Site 1, Industrial Area, Unnao

2000/12.

13. 9267893

Assam Plywood Industries, Vill. Raipur Khajuri Road, YamunaNagar 14. 9267994 2000/12

AmitDecorative Plywood, Vill. Rampur, Post Kharkhoda (Auchandi Boarder) Near Saidpur Chowk, Distt. Sonepat 2000/12

15. 9268087

PoojaDecorative Plywood, Vill. Kami Majга PO Shadipura : Khajuri Road, Yamuna Nagar- 135001 2000/12

16. 9268188

NitinRubbers 152-B, Udyog Nagar, Coop. Industrial Estate Kanpur-203022 2000/12

17 9268289

SuperIndustries Mohalla Katkui, Near Durvesh Shah ki Dargah Amroha Distt . J. P. Nagar - 244221

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( іі)]

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

02202 01

Wodden Flush door shutters

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

00303

Plywood for General purposes

00916

Soare Tins forsolid products

00303

Plywood for general. purposes

00303

Plywood for general purposes

00303.

Plywood for general purposes

01680

Low & Medium pressure land boilers

05676

Moulded Solid Rubber Soles and Heels

04246

Domestic Gas Stoves 1353 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1 2

9268390 2000/12

09382

18.

Butachlor

Anu Products Ltd. ,

Granites

kimine

TigaonRoad, OldFaridabad- 121002

00632

78 2000/12

GammaBHC

199268491

andamiota (Dildane) EC

Anu Products Ltd. , TigaonRoad, Old Faridabad- 121002

2000/12

78 20, 9268592

Sureka Chemicals

08960

Methyl, Parathion birdusting power

C-18, 20& 22 Govt. Industrial Estate Gorakhpur-273015

00303

89 9268693 2001/01

21.

Plywood for Generalpurposes

Alakhnanda Plywood, Industries(P) Ltd. , Hi Ram Vihar Colonyan hel Khajuri Road, YamunaNagar

Block Boards 01659

nominent

22. 9268794 2001

obuveined inwil

/043Alkhmanda Plywood, Industries (P) Ltd.

CN NUR BU BEA

Vill: Ram Vihar Colony, Khajuri Road, Yamuna Nagar- 135000

09020

79 2000/12

Power Threshers

23. 9268895

Kirpal Singh & Sons Sangwan Chowk Darwali Road ,

Sirsa

04246

92 2001/01

Domestic Gas

24. 9268996

Stoves

Satyam Appliances NH-3 NIT A-3824 S. G. M. Nagar Faridabad

08112

auf 43 Grade OPC

2001/01

Leh Coment

25. 9269089

Taru Leh Ladakh

00269

OPC 33 Grade

2001/01

26. 9269190

Lell Content Taru Leh Ladakh

01391

2000/12

27. 9269291

Sidwai Refrigeration

RoomAir Conditioners

Industries Ltd. Manthapal , NahanRoad Kala Amr Sirmour

08291

Phenthoate EC

2000/12

28. 9269392

Fungicides India Ltd. Lane No. 4 Phase - II Sidcowanie milita话。 Indt Complex Bari Brahmna Jammu

12818

2000/12

29. 9269493

PVC Screen Ans Casing Pipes

DuroPipe Industries Vill. Makra Po Lahangpur Jaunpur

88 JCT Ltd.

03975

9269594 2001/01

30.

Mild Steel , Wire, FormedWires

J.C.T.Ltd. (Steel Divn) Vill . Chohai , Chintpurni Road Hoshiarpur

03575

Bitumen Drums

9269695 2001/12

31.

Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. Vill . Baholi Marketing Complex PO Panipat Refinery Panipat

826GI/04-11 1354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004 /CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1 2

32. 9269796 2001/01

Bokhara Industries Pvt. Ltd. , Plot No. B-3 , Sidhwan Industrial Area, Rampur Jaunpur 33. 9269897 2000/12

Leader Forge (India) Pvt . Ltd. A-9 Focal Point Jalander 34. 9269901 2001/01

DharamEngineering Company G.T.Road Batala-143505 35. 9270074 2000/12

Bharat Insecticides Ltd. C-3 and 4 MIE, Bahadurgarh 36. 9270175 2001/01

Jai Chenicals 14/1 Mathura Road Faridabad 37. 9270276 2001/01

Rajasthan Cement Industries Industrial Area Sicop Kathua- 184102

38. 9270377 2001/01

Krishana Wire Insulation Triveni Complex Govardhan Road Mathura - 28 1004 39. 9270478 2000/12

Ajanta Raj Proteins Ltd. Agra Bah Road VPO Manikpura Teh Bah Agra

Surbhi Packers

40. 9270579 2000/12

Khata No. 75/141 Khasra No. 201 / 1/Min/0-16-0 , Khamomajra Mehlan Road Sangrur - 148001 41. 9270680 2001/01

G.C.Beverages Plot No. 63 HPSIDC Baddi Solan

42. 9270781 2001/01

Atul Generators Pvt. , Ltd. Nunhai Indl . , Area Agra -282006

43. 9270882 2001/01

Jai Chemicals 14/1 Mathura Road Faridabad 121003 44. 9270983 2001/01

The British Machinery Supplied Company 17 A Industrial Area New Township Faridabad 2001/02

45. 9271076

Avery Cycle Industries Ltd. Phase Vill . Focal Point Chandigarh Road Ludhiana 46. 9271177 2001/01

Ambika Plywood Ind. (P) Ltd. Vill. , Inderpur Tehsil-Bilaspur Rampur

2001/02

47. 9271278

DattMediproducts Ltd. 53, 54 , and 63 Roz -Ka- Meoi Industrial Area Sohna Gurgaon

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

89 OPC 33 Grade 00269

00778

CopperAlloyGate Globe & Chec

03615

Glossary of Terms Used inAC.

03903

84 Dimethoate Technical

02569

78 Malathion WaterDD

91 Portland Pozzolana 01489 02 Cement

03 95 Submersible Winding Wires for 08783 04

13334 01

Skimmed Milk Powder

10325

Square Tins - 15g/ Litre

13428

Packaged Natural MineralWater

09301

Deepwell, Handpump

95.

9359

Pesticide Phorate GEncapsulate

2000

14769

Household Sewing Machine Head

10748

HotRolled Steel Strip

01659

Block Boards

4605

81 CrepeBandage [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

4 48. 9271379 2001/02

C.R.Auluck and Sons Ltd. Plot No. 426 Industrial Area A Ludhiana 49. 9271480 2001/02

Geminy Industrial Corpn. 270 G.T.Road Dhandari Ludhiana - 141010 50. 9271581 2001/02

Ample Hydraulics G-21 , Phase VIII Industrial area, Mohali

51. 9271682 2001/02

V.K. Industries Katoratal Road Kashipur Distt: U.S. Nagar - 244713 52. 9271783 2001/01

Asndotra Cement Industries Industrial Extension Area Kathua (J& K) 53. 9271884 2001/02 .

Tentiwal Wire Products Ltd. Radhey Shyam Colony Delhi-Masani Road , Mathura

54. 9271985 2001/02

Blue Bird Appliances Pvt. Ltd. 3F/09 First Floor B.P.NIT Faridabad 55. 9272078 2001/02

Vallabh Steels Ltd. G.T.Road Vill. , Nandpur Sahnewal , Ludhiana - 141120

56. 9272179 2001/02

Surjeet Steel Industries D-130 Industrial Area Phase Vill. Sas Nager, Mohali 57. 9272280 2001/03

Hindustan Wires Ltd. 267-268 , Sector 24 Faridabad 58. 9272381 2001/02

Winner Industries 3761 MCF Sanjay Colony 33 FeetRoad Sector 23, Faridabad

59. 9272482 2001/02

Galaxy Plywood Industries Pvt . Ltd. Vill. , Kami Majra Khajuri Road , Yamunanagar

60. 9272583 2001/02

Galaxy Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vill . , Kami Majra Khajuri Road Yamunanagar

61. 9272684 2001/02

Durable Conductors Vill . , Katha PO Baddi Solan

62. 9272785 2001/02

Durable Conductors Vill. , Katha PO Baddi Solan- 173205

1355 5

2000

14769

Household Sewing Machine Head

2000

14769

Household Sewing Machine Head

03564

95 Hydraulically Regulated Door Closers

09537 03

83 Conduit for Electrical Installations

08112

89 43Grade, OPC

08783 04 03 95 Winding Wires for Submersible

04246

92 Domestic Gas Stoves

03601

84 Steel Tubes For Mech: and Gen.

02713 1-3

Tubular Steel Polesfor Overhead

03196 01

Welded Low CarbonSteel Cylinders

01709

84 Elec. Fan Motors

90 Block Boards

01659

00303

89 Plywood for General Purposes

00398 04

Alum Conductors for Overhead Trans- mission Purposes

00398 01

Alum Conductors forOverhead Trans- mission Purposes 1356

[PART I-SEC 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

6 2

89 63. 9272886 2001/02

00303

Harisar Industrial Corpn , C-155 Focal Point Ludhiana

Plywood for General Purposes

64. 9272987 2001/02

01659

rach Block Boards

Harisar Industrial Corpn . C- 155 Focal Point Phase V Ludhiana

01659

65. 9273080 2001/02

BlackBoards

Kitply Industries Ltd. Shahband Road PO Rampur-244901

98 66. 9273181 2001/03

13428

Packaged Natural Mineral Water

MountEverest Mineral Water Ltd. , VPO Dhaula Kaunm Teh . Paonta Sahib , Sirmour

92 67. 9273282 2001/01

13513

214 -D Ethyl Ester

Granules

Anu Products Ltd. Tigaon RoadOld Faridabad

79 2001/03

68 9273383

09020

Power Threshers

Sonalika Agro Industries Corpn.

Vill: Chak Gujran Jalandhar RoadHoshiarpur- 146002

43 Grade OPC 08112

Amar Cements

69. 9273484 2001/02

SICOP Industrial Area Hatlik More Kathua (J&K)

08828

70. 9273585 2001/03

Schneider Electric India Ltd. 10, DLF Industrial Area Phase 2 Faridabad

04246

71. 9273686 2001/03

Electrical Accessories- Gircuit Domestic Gas stoves

Preet Stove Udyog Vill . Gullarwala Sai Road Industrial Area PO . Kudhwara Baddi

03686

2001/03

72. 9273787

B.J. Scientific Instruments

StudentType Microscope

Company 6268/43 Ahata Hari Parshad Nicholsan Road Ambala Cantt-133001

05279

DICOFOL . , F.C.

73 9273888 2001/02

JAI Chemicals 14/1 Mathura Road Faridabad

76 2001/03

00710

74. 9273989

Marine Plywood

Sudarshan Doors Pvt. Ltd. Visayak Pur Rania Karipur Dehat

: 14769

2001/03

75. 9274082

Household Sewing Machine Head

NavrangManufacturing Corpn . 163 Sherpur Road Bye Pass Ludhiana - 141010

OPC08112

010 43, Grade

2001/03

9274183

Shivalik Cement Industrial Estate Battle Ballian Udhampur ( J& K)

00444

RubberWater

2001/03

77. 9274284

Hose

Gates India Pvt . Ltd. Vill . Sarsini Ambala Chandigarh , Highway PO Lalru Lalru [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राजपत्र मार्च 27, 2004/क्षेत्र 7.1926

1 2 3

4 78. 9274385 2001/02

Gates India Pvt. Ltd, Vill. Sarsini Ambala Chandigarh Highway PO Lalru Lalru 79. 9274486 2001/03

N.K. Enterprises STTIGAD SKI

1357 5

00447

88 RubberHose for Welding

02494 01 94 Belts For INDI. Be EndlessV

VIII PritampuraRoad Badmalik

PO P.S. Rai Sonepat

80. 92745872001/03

MLA/International D-105 Focal Point Extension Jalandhar 81. 9274688 2001/03

Ragunath Rubber Industries Dukhari Road Vill . Mohra

Ambala Canttcard:

82. 9274789 2001/03

Northern India Chemical Industries 182/79, INDI. , Area Phase Chandigarh 83. 92748902001/03

Rama Industries Ltd.

Vill. Chaundheri PO Dappar Teh. Rajpura Ambala

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

00447

RubberHose for

88 Welding

08249

94 Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate, Agris

إلي

70 Golatin Food Grade 105719

Chandigarh-

Highway Distt : Patiala - 140506

84. 9274991 2001/03

Rex Sowing Machine CO. (P) LTD. 245 Industrial Area Aci Ludhiana 141003 85. 9275084 2001/03

3Singer India Ltd.

Lane No. 4 SIDCO Industrial Area Bari Brahmna Jammu-181133 86. 9275185 2001/03

Chattan Cement Industries SICOP IndustrialArea Haflimore Kathua ( J&K) 87. 9275286 2001/03

Bhawani Industries Pvt . Ltd. Vill. Ajnali Backside Focal Point G.T. Road Mandi Gobindgarh Distt

Fatehgarh Sahib 88: 9275387 2001/03 .

Bhawani Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vill. Ajnali Backside Focal Point G.T. Road Mandi Gobindgarh Distt

Fatehgarh Sahib 89. 9275488 2001/03

Surya Tiles And Ravers in Plot No. 280 Industrial , Area Panchkula 90. 9275589 2001 /03 /

Surya Tiles and Pavers Plot No. 280 Industrial Area Phase II Panchkula

14769

2000 Household Sewing MaulhineHead

Sewing14769 2000 Household MachineHead

43 Grade OPC

::08112

10748

Hot Rolled Steel Strip

01239

90 Mild Steel Tubes ,

Tubulars

01237

80 Cement Concrete Flooring Tiles

13801

93 Chequered Cement Concrete Tiles 1358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

91. 9275690 2001/03

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 5

01328

96 Veneered Decorative Plywood

StarPlyboards Ltd.

Vill., Gadhouli Near Tejli

Sports Complex, Yamunanagar

92. 9275791 2001/03

01328

96 Veneered Decorative Plywood

AjayPlywood Industries Pvt . Ltd.

Jagadhri Distt.

Yamunanagar

93. 9275892 2001/03

Bhambri Steels Pvt. Ltd. Amloh RoadMandi Gobindgarh Vill . Tooran Distt . Fatehgarhsahib - 1437301 94. 9275993 2001/03

Shalimar Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. Nandgaon Road Vill . Barhana Kosi Kalan Mathura 95. 9276086 2001/03

Sidharth Industries Plot No. E -30 Industrial , Focal Point Hoshiarpur - 146001 96. 9276187 2001/03

Siri Ram Fertilizers Mfg .. Co. C-58 Focal Point Kotkapura - 151204 97. 9276288 2001/03

Shri Ram Crop Chemical , Pvt. Ltd. Gudar Dhandi Road Guru Har Sahai Distt Ferozepur- 98. 9276389 2001/03

Nipco Internationals 2, Gaispura Road Po Dhandari Kalan Ludhiana- 99. 9276490 2001/03

D.S. Foods Ltd. Vill . Raison Distt. Kullu (HP)- 100. 9276591 2001/03

Perfect Electro Controls Basti Bawa Khel Kapurthala Road Jalandhar - 144021 9276692 2001/03

101.

Vidhata Cement Co. Pvt . Ltd. Industrial Area C Jaspal Bangran Road Outside Octroi Kanganwai , Ludhiana- 9276793 2001/03

102.

Vidhata Cement Co. Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Area C Jaspal Bangran road Outside Octrol Kanganwai , Ludhiana- 9276894 2001/03

103.

Anand Electrolab Cables (P) Ltd. 54 KM Stone GT Road Bhigan Sonepat-

02062

Steel for General Structural Purposes

01838 01 83 Fillers for Expansion joint in

02347

95 Domestic Pressure Cookers

08249

94 Zinc Sulphate HeptahydrateAgri

08249

Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate Agri

2000

14769

Household Sewing Machine Head

13428

98 Packaged Natural , Mineral Water

08828

Electrical, Accessories- Circuit

Block Boards

01659

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

01 88

01554

PVC Insulated (Heavy Duty) Electric Cables [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1359

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

104. 9276995 2001/03

J.K. Appliances Vill. DaonNearMinerva Academy Teh. Kharar Distt : Ropar- 105. 9277088 2001/03

PerfectAgro Mills (P) Ltd. Millanpur Road VPO Humbrand Distt : Ludhiana- 106. 92771892001/02 .

Rita Machines (India) Ltd. 416 , Industrial Area ' A' Ludhiana-

107. 9277290 2001/03

Perfect Agro Mills (P) Ltd. Millanpur Road VPO Humbran Distt: Ludhiana 108. 9277391 2001/03

Sondhi ManufacturingCo. Outside Industrial Area Jalandhar City- 144001 109. 9277492 2001/03

Satraj Pvt. Ltd. C-90 Phase , VII Indl. Area Mohali-

9277593 2001/03

110.

A.K. Tools Industries M-33 IndustrialArea Jalandhar

111. 9277694 2001/03

Bharat Rasayan Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road Kala Amb . Tehsil Nahan, Dist : Sirmour 112. 9277795 2001/03

RoopEnterprises 182/74 Indl . Area Phase - 1 Chandigarh

9277896 2001/03

113.

Bir Sain Anand & Co. Pvt . Ltd. Lane No. 5 , Phase II SIDCO Ind. Complex Bari Brahmna Jammu

9277997 2001/03

114.

Vidya Ply & Board Pvt . Ltd. Vill. Lalpur Post -Dadraul Jalalabad Road

Shahjahanpur - 242001 115. 9278090 2001/03

PoojaMachines Pvt. Ltd. VPO Haryal Pathankot - 145001 2001/03

116. 9278191

Shivalik Agro Chemicals B-59 Phase VII Sas Nagar 9278292 2001/03

117.

Shivalik Agro Chemicals B -59 Phase VII , Sas Nagar 118, 9278393 2001/03

Saraf Industries Bhatinda Road Rampura Phul Distt . Bhatinda - 151103 2001/03

119. 9278494

Precision Meters (P) Ltd. Barwala Road Vill . Madhopur Dera Bassi Distt: Patiala- 140507 5

92 DomesticGas Stoves 04246

00303

89 Plywood for General Purposes

14769

2000 Household Sewing Machine Head

Block Boards

01659

00780

84 Sluice Valves for waterworks

02494 01 94 V Belts Endless V Belts for Industrial Purposes

00778

CopperAlloyGate Globe and chec .

80 Endosul Fan EC

04323

01061

Disinfactant Fluids, PhenolicType

00458

88 Precast Concrete Pipes

01328

96 Veneered Decorative Plywood

14769

2000 Household Sewing Machine Head

11997

87 Fenvalerate EC

10319

82 Ethion EC

13779

AC Static Watthour Meters, Class 1 and 2

13779

93 AC Static Watthour Meters, Class 1 and 2 1360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

120. 9278595 2001/03

Vidhya Dye Chem. Industries

1891 , Modern Industrial, Estate Bahadurgarh - 124507 2001/03

121. 9278696

Shivalik Chemicals Pvt. Ltd 349, Phase II Industrial , Area Chandigarh.

122. 9278797 2001/04

A. S. Metal , Steel Works Ram Nagar Jalandhar - 144008 9278803 2001/04

123.

Jagota Metal Industries

E-59 Industrial Area Jalandhar-

124. 9278902 2001/04

Varuni Industries 32Anand Puri Basant Vihar Ludhiana-

125. 9279092 2001/04

SinglaMotors

5 KM Milestone Kaithal Road, Karnal

2001/04

126. 9279193

AgroSteel Castings

419, Behind HSIDC Office Industrial, Estate Yamuna Nagar- 135001 127. 9279294 2001/04

Safex Chemicals India Ltd.

A- 2, MIF Delhi Rohtak Road Bahadurgarh -124057 2001/04

128. 9279395

Rama Rubber Industries :

291 , Umran. Rania Kanpur

Dehat-

9279496 2001/04

129.

G.C. Jain Engg. Works Daba Road G.T. Road Ludhiana-

9279597 2001/03

130.

Gold Mohur Foods and Feeds

Ltd. Focal Point Dhakansu Road Rajpura Distt : Patiala - 140501 131. 9279601 2001/04

Deepak Fasteners Ltd. E-535 to 538-555 PH . VI Focal Point Ludhiana- 132. 9279702 2001/04

Deepak Fastners Ltd.

E-535 to 538-555 PH . VI Focal Point Ludhiana- 2001/04

133.9279803

Supreme Surgicals

Rohtak Sonepat Road Bohar Rohtak- 124023

R.R. Metal Works 9279904 2001/04

134.

78, Globe Colony Jalandhar- 9280077 2001/04

R. C. Products 135.

Opp ITI Chandpur Yamunanagar- 135001

[PART II SBC . 3 (ii)] 2

Synthetic Food Colour 0534694

08249

Zinc Sulphate

hepthallydrate, Agri

02692

89 Ferrules for Water

Services

-ansidbod

00778

84 CopperAlloy.Gate

Glove & Check Valves

2000

14769

Household Sewing Machine Head

09079

Monoset Pumpfor

Clear Cold Water

02202

99. Wooden Flush Door

Shuttery

wabacht

09356

Butachlor EC

02494 01 94 V Belts Endles V

Belts for Industrial Purposes

2000

14769

Household Sewing

Machine Head

02052

Compousaded Feed

for Cattle

01363 01 92 Hexagon Head

Bolts Screw & Nuts

12427

Transmission Tower

Bolt

00863

Handloom Cotton Bandage......

00778

Copper Alloy Gate Glore & Check Valves

00303

Plywood for General Purposes 1361

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

36. 9280178 2001/04

R. C. Products Opp ITI Chandpur Yamuna Nagar- 135001 137. 9280279 2001/03

AmitDecorative Plywoods Vill . Rampur PO Kharkhoda (Auchandi Border) Near Saidpur Chowk Distt : Sonepat- 9280380 2001/04

138.

Narendera Scientific Industries 2773/18 Timber Market Ambala Cantt- 133001 139. 9280481 2001/03

SPL Ltd. Kassar Distt. Jhajjar (Hr.)- 124507 140. 9280582. 2001/04

Sadashiv Structural (P)Ltd. Pandwala RoadMubarikpur Derabassi Distt . Patiala 141. 9280683 2001/05

Oswal Electricals (Pumps) 71/3 Milestone G.T.Road Karnal

2001/04

142. 9280784

Radicals Instruments 123 , Industrial Estate Ambala Cantt.

9280885 2001/03

143.

Hansa Tubes Ltd. Habitpur Road Dera Bassi Distt . Patiala .

2001/04

144. 9280996

Golden Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. Mullanpur Road VPO Humbran Distt. Ludhiana 9281079 2001/05

145.

Balaji Industries C-3A Focal Point Kotkapura .

146. 9281180 2001/05

Avon Meters Pvt . Ltd. D- 15 Industrial Focal Point Dera Bassi 9281281 2001/04

147.

Balswar Spun Pipe Industries Vill. Bariya (Motinager) PO Budhera Distt . Barabanki.

9281382 2001/03

148.

Shri Nath Industries 36 , Industrial Estate Kathua

9281483 2001/03

149.

Crystal Phosphates Ltd. Vill .Nathupur Distt. Sonepat 9281584 2001/04

150.

Sudheer Scientific Works 1265 Bengali Mohalla Ambala Cantt.

826G1 /04-12

01659

Block Boards

01659

90 Block Boards

03104 01 82 Density Hydrometer

13753

Dust Pressed Ceramic Tiles

01239 01 90 Mild Steel Tubes, Tubulars

09079

Monoset Pump For Clear Cold Water

04381

Pathological Microscope

00513

94 Carbon Steel Sheets And Strips

02202 01 90 Wooden Flush

Door Shutters

08249

94 Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate Agri

13779

93 Ac Static Watthour Meters Class 1 and 2

00458

Precast Concrete Pipes

01480 02 91 Portland Pozzolana Cement

04323

Endosulfan EC

04381

Pathological Microscope 1362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 12

151. 9281685 2001/04

Sureka Chemicals

02568

Malathion Dusting Powder

C-18,20 & 22 Government Industrial Estate Gorakhpur- 273015

152. 9281786 2001/04

01879

Malleable Cast Iron , PipeFittings

Shobit Mallables A-25 Indl . Estate Jalandhar - 144004

153. 9281887 2001/04

00778

Rajan Metal Industries M- 35 Industrial Area Jalandhar .

Copper Alloy Gate Globe & Check and Valves

154. 9281988 2001/05

00778

84 Juneja Metal Works Vill., Variana Kapurthala Road PO Basti Guzan Jalandhar .

CopperAlloy Gate Globe & Check and Valves

155. 9282081 2001/04

00280

Mild Steel Wire

rota

Sahni Strips & Wires Pvt . Ltd. Rathdana Road Aknbarpı Distt. Sonepat

156. 9282182 2001/04

00778

CopperAlloy Gate Globe & Chec

P.R. Metal Industries 140 E Focal Point Phase IV Ludhiana.

157. 9282283 2001/04

05382

ToothPowder

85 Efforts Rubber Industry Main Market Opp UCO Bank Kalanpur (Rohtak)

158. 9282384 2001/05

Galvanized Steel Sheets 00277

Hansa Metallics Ltd. Vill . , Sumalheri Lalru Distt . Patiala.

159. 9282485 2001/05

08462

Sterilizer Portable Vertical

Geeta Industries Mukerji Park Jagadhri Distt . Yamuna Nagar .

160. 9282586 2001/05

01161

Steel Tubes For Structural Purposes

Sadashiv Structurals Pvt . Pandwala Road Mubarikpur Derabassi Disti . Patiala

161. 9282687 2001/05

05346

Synthetic Food Colour

Shree R. International 47/50 First Floor General Ganj Kanpur.

162. 9282788 2001/05

02052

Compounded Feed ForCattle

Ajanta Feed Industries Near Gaib Di Pulli G. T. Road Khanna Distt . Ludhiana .

163. 9282889 2001/05

07098 02 85 Skytone Electricals (India) Ltd. 42 & 43 Industrial Area NIT Faridabad,

Crosslinked Polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

164. 9282990 2001/05

09537 03 83

Conduits for ELE Installations

Prateek Extrusion Pvt . Ltd. 401 , Phase 4 Udyog Vihar Gurgaon.

[ भाग II.खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] :

1363

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1 2

165. 9283083 2001/05

Rohit Engineering Works Outside Bhagat Singh Nagar G.T. Road Bye Pass Jalandhar .

9283184 2001/05

166 ,

Haryana Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. 33 KM Stone G. T. Karnal Road PO Kundli Sonepat.

167. 9283285 2001/05

Kissan Chemical, and Fertilizers Kotli Road Kukatsar - 152026 .

168. 9283386 2001/05

Bajaj Home Products G. T. Road Fatehabad.

169. 9283487 2001/05

Kay sons Electrical Pvt . Ltd. SH- 15/ 79 - A Shivpur Varanasi .

170. 9283588 2001/05

Wincem Paints (P) Ltd. Near PCPJ , Bhankerpur Teh . Derabassi Mubarikpur Road Distt , Patiala - 140201 .

171. 9283689 2001/05

Quality Pumps Pvt. Ltd. 95 -A Dada Nagar Kanpur.

172. 9283790 2001/05

New Century Cement Company Rurail, Focal, Point Vill . Pathrala Distt. Bhatinda .

9283891 2001/05

173.

Haryana Agro Fertilizers and Chemicals G.T. Road Shahbad Markamda - 136135 .

9283992 2001/05

174.

Haryana AFRO Fertilizers and Chemicals, G.T. Road,. Shahbad Markanda .

9284085 2001/05

175.

Kirshna Krishna Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. , Shop No. 112 , Old Court Road , Panipat- 132103 .

9284186 2001/05

176.

ESS ESS Kay Co. Ltd. , Factory Area Post Box No. 6 Kapurthala - 144601 .

2001/05

1.9284287

India Pesticides Ltd. , E- 18 to 23 UPSIDC Industrial Area Deva Road Chinhat Lucknow.

2001/05

178. 9284388

00778

CopperAlloyGate Globe & Check Valves

Block Boards

01659

08249

94 ZincSulphate Heptahydrate Agri

Biscuits

01011

09537 02 81 Conduit for Electrical Installations

92 Cement Paint

05410

14104

Deepwell Handpump Components -Nitrile Rubber

00455

89 Portland Slag Cement

13403

Pesticide Anilophos

09356

80 Butachlor EC

01417

99 Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery

00694

90 PVC Insulated Cables

03901

Ziram Water, DP

11010

Ziram Colloidal

India Pesticides Ltd. E- 18 to 23 UPSIDC Industrial Area Suspension Dewa Road Chinhat Lucknow .

1364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

179. 9284489 2001/05

Standard Rubber Rubber Mills Khandsá Road Gurgaon-122001 .

180. 9284590 2001/05

Daikin Shriram Air Conditioning PvtLtd., Plot No. 14 Sec . 14 Faridabad- 121004 .

181. 9284691 2001/05

Crystal Phosphate Ltd. G.T. Karnal Road, VPO Nathupur

Distt.: Sonepat. 2001/05

182. 9284792

P.N. Safetech Pvt . Ltd. E-4 Govt. Industrial Estate Talkotra Road Lucknow - 22601 .

9284893 2001/05

183.

Haryana Wood Products Vill. Mukarabpur Chhachhrauli Road Jagadhari Distt.: Yamunanagar.

184. 9284994 2001/05

JaspreetFoundry GurdaspurRoad Vill.: Kutbi Nangal Batala- 143501 .

9285087 2001/05

185.

Sam Cable & Conductors (P) Ltd. Vill.: Shimla Pistor PO Lalpur 6Km. Rudrapur-Kichha Road Rudrapur Distt.: U.S. Nagar .

9285188 2001/06

186.

Shri RamAgro Bagrian Road V. Bardwaı Dhuri - 148024 .

9285289 2001/05

187.

Shree Ganesh Jewellers Ltd First Mall TheMall Ludhiana.

9285390 2001/06

188.

SA Timber Traders Vill . Kami Majra Khajuri Road Yamunanagar.

9285491 2001/06

189.

SA Timber Traders Vill . Kami Majra Khajuri Road Yamunanagar.

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

10908

91 Flexible Rubber Tubing

01391 01

92 RoomAir Conditioners

08249

94 ZincSulphate Heptahydrate, Agri

02925

Industrial , Safety Helmet

01659

90 Block Boards

86 Horizontally Cast 07181 IronDouble Flanged Pipes for Water, Gas and Sewage

07098 01

Cross Linked Polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

08249

94 Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate, Agri

01417

99 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts-Finess andMarking

00303

Plywood for General, Purposes

01659

Block Boards [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1365

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

9285592 2001/06

190.

Metro Plywood (P) Ltd. At & PO Damla Delhi Road Yamunanagar.

191. 9285693 2001/06

Metro Plywood (P) Ltd. At& PO Damla Delhi Road Yamunanagar- 135001 .

192. 9285794 2001/05

Muteer Electrical Industries 19B Industrial Estate Barzulls Sant Nagar- 190005. 193: 9285895 2001/05

CICO Technologies Ltd. 3 Km Basai Road Gurgaon.

194. 9285996 2001/06

Sudheer Scientific Works 1265 Bengali Mohalla Ambala Cantt. 2001/05

195. 9286089

Hindustan Safety Glass Works Bamrauli Allahabad - 211012. 2001/06

196. 9286190

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. Near Gurunanak Dev Thermal Plant Malout Road Bhatinda- 151005.

9286291 2001/06

197.

Sunder Lal Mohinder Pal Jain Sadar Bazar Bhatinda.

9286392 2001/05

198.

Bharat Rasayan Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road Kalá ÁMB. Teh . Nahan Distt. Sirmour - 173030 .

9286493 2001/05

199.

Bharat Rasayan Agro (P) Ltd. Trilokpur Road Kala AMB . Teh. Nahan Distt . Sirmour .

9286594 2001/06

200.

Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. Near Gurunanak Dev Thermal PlantMalout Road, Bhatinda- 151005 .

Block Boards

01659

00303

89 Plywood for General, Purposes

93 Stationary Storage , 02082 ELE Water Heaters

02645

75 Integral Cement Waterproofing

08275

Binocular Eye- pieces forMicro- scope

03438

94 Silvered Glass Mirrors

01489

91 Portland Pozzolana Cement

01417

99 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefects-Finess and Marking

08074

Monocroptophos SI

12016

Cypermethrin EC

12269

53 Grade OPC

[Ref: CMD - 1/13 : 11 ] S.K. CHAUDHURI, Dy. Director General 1366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नईदिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 747.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2468 , तारीख 19 अगस्त, 2003 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 30 अगस्त, 2003 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पानेवाडी ( मनमाड) से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई- मनमाड पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 13 अक्तूबर, 2003 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । तहसील: मालेगांव

अनुसूची

जिला: नाशिक

ग्राम का नाम

गट/सर्वे नंबर

(3) ( 1 ) ( 2)

1. चोंढी

52भाग

451भाग 2. जलगांव (निं)

381/2भाग

35/1 भाग 3. कालेवाड़ी

35/2भाग 4. घोडेगाव

25/1 भाग

79/1 भाग

53/1 अ भाग 5. मेहुणे

55/3 भाग

56/1/2 भाग

109 भाग

193 भाग 6. चंदनपुरी

188/3 भाग

119/1 भाग

119/2 भाग

119/3 भाग

89/1 भाग

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्र

आर

चौरस मीटर हैक्टर

(5)

(6 ) (4)

08 0

77 0

00 0

80200

60 0

34 0

64 0

06 0

57 0

40 0

56 0

50 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1) (2)

(3)

89/2भाग चंदनपुरी (जारी)

89/3भाग 7. मालधे

107 भाग

106(ब) भाग 8. सर्वदगांव

92भाग

109/अ भाग

194/3 भाग 9. सायने बुद्रुख

168/2भाग 10. माल्हणगांव

278/2भाग

101/3 भाग

90/1 भाग

90/4भाग 11. चिखलओहोल

483/अ भाग

484/ब भाग

401/1 भाग

371/1/2भाग 12. नाले

175/1/1 भाग

175/10/2भाग ,

36/1 भाग

36/2/2भाग

39/2भाग

48/1 भाग 13. देवरपाडे

197/1 अ भाग

197/2भाग

186/3 भाग

184/2भाग

184/4 भाग

176

14. भिलकोट

45/1 अ/1 भाग

92/1 भाग

123भाग

153/2भाग

303/3 भाग 15. गुगलवाड

309/2भाग

282/24/3 भाग

243/1 भाग 16. पलासदरे

93/2भाग

104/2भाग

173/1 ए/ 1 भाग

1367

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र7,1926

(4)

(5)

(6) 0

49 0

50 0

70 0

72 0

44 0

66 0

12 0

24 0

20 0

80 0

00 0

า

00 6204040390806023488 60

[फा. सं . आर-31015/10/2001 - ओ आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 1368

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii))

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURALGAS

New Delhi , the 16th March, 2004

S.O 747. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , number S.O. 2468 dated the 19th August 2003 , issued under Sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 30th August, 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manmad Pipeline Extension Project from Panewadi (Mammad) in the State of Maharashtra to Manglya ( Indore) in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

2003; And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 13th October , And whereas the competent authority has under Sub - section (1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

Andwhereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said. land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.;

And, further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on this date of the publication of this declaration, in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

District: Nashik Tahsil : Malegaon

Gat/Survey Name of Village

Numbers

52Pt.

1. Chondi

451 PE 2. Jalgaon (N)

380/2 Pt.

35/1Pt.

3. Kalewadi

35/2Pt.

25/1 Pt. 4.Ghodegaon

79/1 Pt

53/1 A Pt. 5. Mehune

55/3 Pt.

56/1/2Pt .

109Pt.

193 Pt. 6. Chandanpuri

188/3Pt.

119/1 Pt.

119/2 Pt.

119/3 Pt.

89/1 Pt.

89/2Pt .

89/3 Pt.

SCHEDULE

State: Maharashtra

Ares

Hectors

Sq. Mts.

も

U [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र . मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7. 1926

0 7 Meldhe

107 PL.

106(B)Pt.

92Pt .

8. Savandgaon

109/A Pt.

194/3 Pt.

9 Sayane Budruk

168/2 Pt.

278/2 Pt.

10.Malangaon

101/3 Pt.

90/1 Pt .

90/4Pt.

483 /APL.

11. Chikhai Obal

484/B Pt .

401/1 Pt.

371/1/2 Pt .

0 12.Nale

175/ 1B/ 1 Pt.

175/ 1B/2 Pt.

36/1 Pt .

36/2/2Pt.

39/2Pt.

48/1 Pt.

197/1 APt.

13. Devarpade

197/2 Pt.

186/3 Pt.

184/2 Pt.

184/4 Pt

176

45/1A/ 1 Pt.

14. Bhilkot

92/1 Pt.

123 /Pi

153/2 Pt.

303/3 Pt.

15.Gugalwad

309/2Pt.

282/2B/3 PL.

243/1 Pt.

0 16. Palasdare

93/2Pt .

104/2 Pt.

173/ 1A/ 1 Pt. 826 G1 /04-13

1369 5

(17

(07

[F. No. R- 31015/ 10/2001 -OR- IIJ HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 27 , 2004 / CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 17 मार्च , 2004

का आ 748.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्यमें पानेवाडी ( मनमाड ) संस्थापन से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मागाच्या इदौर तक पेटोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानीचाहिए

आर केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में गहरे जिसमे उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अत अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खजिन पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का : 0 ) को धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की लपणा करती है

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र , की प्रतियां धारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में श्री वी०पी ० पाठक, सक्षम प्राधिकारी भर गढ़‌माङ पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, सी/ 19 -ए, स्कीम नं० 78 , स्लाइस नं ० 5 , ए० वी० गेड इन्दौर मध्य प्रदेश को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेपज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश

जिला: इन्दौर

तरमा देपालपुर

ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे नंवर

क्षेत्रफल

हैक्टेयर ( 1) ( 2)

(0)

(4)

(5) धन्नड़

$33

0.0360

628

0.0022

858

0.0210

522

0.0030

382

0.0290

358/1

0.0070

521/3

0.0790

521/5

0.0990

490/2

0.0250

[फा. सं. आर. 31015/43/2001- ओ आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi . the 17th March, 2004

048-Where appears to the Central Governinent that it is necessary in the public interest that for the ansportation of petrole in products from the Panewadi ( Mammad ) terminal in the State of Maharashtra , an extension papa | Megha ( Ind . c) in the State of Madhya Pradesh should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

appaste the Central Governmen that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to aglu of user in th land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the edme am, sed hereto ;

Pow. therefore in excrcise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on whis's copes of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , in writing to the aequon of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri V.P. Pathak , Competent Authority , Mums Manmad Pipeline Extension Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, C/ 19 -A, Scheme No. 78. Slice No. 5, AB Road Indore - 452010 ( Madhya Pradesh ) .

1371 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

District : Indore

State: Madhya Pradesh Tehsil : Depalpur

Area inHectare

SurveyNo.

Name ofVillage

(4)

(3)

(1) ( 2)

0.0360

633/2

Dhannad

0.0022

628

0.0210

858

522

0.0030

2. Dharavara

0.0290

382

0.0070

358/1

0.0790

521/3

0.0990

521/5

00240

490/2

JF . No 9-31015 /4: 2000K-

HARISH KUMAR. Under S

नई दिल्ली, 20 ia

का. आ. 749.- तेल उद्योग ( विकास ) आंधनियम 1974 ( 191 का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार नीचे लिखे नामों के सामने इंगित अवधि भारा 3 की स्पधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड (ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों अगले आदेश होने तक, उनमें से जो भी पहले लागू हो, निम्नलिखित अधिकारियों को तेल उद्योग विकास बोर्ड के सदस्यों के पुनः नियुक्त करती है ।

तक

से

2-2-2006

3-2-2004

श्री प्रत्युश सिन्हा, सचिव, रसायन एवं पेट्रो. रसायन मंत्रालय

23-42001

22-9 134

श्रीजे. एम. मॉस्कर, संयुक्त सचिव , पेट्रोलियम एवं प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

( संख्या जी-35012/2/91 - विन-li

के. पो के नाम्बिसन, अवर सचि

NewDelhi, the 17th March, 2004

S.O. 749. In exercise of the powers conferred b , Clanse ( crof Sub - secren of Set the Citade (Development ) Act , 1974 (47 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints/te-appoints the following officers as Members of the Oil Industry Development Board for the pored shown against their names or until further orders , whichever iscarlier:

Froin

To 1. Shri Pratyush Sinha. Secretary. Deptt. ofC & PC

-2103

2. Shri J. M Mauskar, Joint Secretary, MOP

[No. G -35012 /2 /41 -Fi Bl

K.PK NASAnder Sv.

[PART II --- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1.72

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 22 मार्च, 2004

का. आ 750. केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 1962 का 101 ( जिये इसमें इसके पश्चात् क्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, जो भारत के राजपत्र में तारीख अगस्त, 2003 को प्रकाशित की गई थी, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 2197 तारीख 28 जुलाई 2002 द्वारा कतिपय भूमि गुरू गाबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा गुणराव राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल सस्थापन से पजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 05 सितम्बर, 2003 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

अतःअर्थ केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना ने सलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ;

ओर केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के जाए, सभी विल्लगमों में मुक्त. गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कारपोरशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) में नि

अनुसूची

जिला: कच्छ

तहसील: अन्जार

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्र

भाग यदिहै तो

सर्वे नंबर

ग्राम का नाम

मेन्टी आर

हैक्टर

आर

1 2

29 1. चन्द्रोडा

ट्रावर्स 600 पैकी

71 268

90 266

ट्रार्वस 600 पैकी

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 600

पैकी

279.3

280

49 2500 पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक

नाला

03 4

4.1

2/6 1373

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नदी भुवड (जारी )

460/3

नाला

187/1

नाला

186/1

नाला

684

692

165/1

164

148

147

ट्रार्वस 671 पैकी

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 718

3. खेडोई मोटी

लेराख नदी

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 718

कार्ट ट्रेक

ट्रार्वस 718 पैकी

468

466

नाला 4. खंभरा

141

5. सीनुग्रा

148/2

26/2

6 मोटा नागलपुर

सोंग नदी

कार्ट ट्रेक

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 182

7. नागनपर नाजा

पैकी

नदी

75 00

92 00

00 1374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

1 2

4 8. अन्जार

158/1

142

140/2

140/1

139

137

253

पैकी

254

पैकी

267

पैकी

270

301

306

पैकी

308/1

347

पैकी

444/2

442

497

9. मीठा पसवारीया

ट्रार्वस 162 पैकी

101

104/1

88/2

नाला 10. खारा पसवारीया

234

पैकी

197/2

197/1

199

पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक

198

पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक

ट्रार्वस 204

नाला

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 204

कार्ट ट्रेक

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 5

41 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1375

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

296

11. अजापर

292/2

पैकी

224

161

160

पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक

625/2

12. भीमासर

626

मेटल रोड

ट्रार्वस 785 पैकी

671

670

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 785

741

731

733

पैकी

736

पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक

पैकी

101

308

13. पसुडा

335

336

पैकी

338/2

पैकी

342

346

349

368/1

पैकी

380

कार्ट ट्रेक 5

[फा. सं. आर -31015/47/2001- ओआर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 1376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 22nd March, 2004

S.O. 750.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , Number S.O. 2197 dated the 28th July, 2003 , issued under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India, on the 2nd August, 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in certain land for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of Crude Oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State ofGujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refinerics Limited ( a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited); 2003; Andwhereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 5th September , Andwhereas, the competent authority has under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on the date of publication of the declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited(a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

District: Kutch Taluka: Anjar

Name ofVillage

SurveyNo. PartifAny 1

3 (1) Chandroda

Trowers 600 P

268

266

Trowers 600 P

279/3

280

Trowers 600 P

CartTrack

Nala

488

485/2

474

276

(2) Bhuvad

River

460/3

Nala

187/1

State: Gujarat

ROU Area

Ha.

Ar. Sq. int.

29 00

71 00

90 00

06 (X)

48 00

49 00

65 00

18 00

80 00

41 00

18 00

99 00

26 00

82 1377

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Nala

186/1

Nala

684

692

165/1

164

148

147

Trowers 671 P

Trowers 718 P

(3) KhedoiMoti

Lerakh River

Trowers 718 P

CartTrack

Trowers 718 P

468

466

Nala (4) Khambhara

141

(5) Sinugra

148/2

126/2

(6) Mota Nagalpar

SongRiver

CartTrack

Trowers 182 P

(7) Nagalpur Nana- 2

P River

158/1

(8) Anjar

142

140/2

140/1

139

137

253

254

267

270

301

306

308/1

374

444/2

826 G1/04-14

98 00

05 00

32 00

00 00

11 00

10 00

30 00

60 00

00 .

33 00

64 00

00 00

00 1378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

442

497

(9) Mitha Paswaria

Trowers 162 P

101

104/1

88/2

Nala

234

P ( 10) Khara Paswaria

197/2

197/1

199

P CartTrack

198

Trowers 204 P CartTrack

Nala

Trowers 204 P CartTrack

296

(11) Ajapar

292/2

224

161

160

P [PART II- SEC. 3( ii)]

46 00

12 00

49 00

53 00

67 00

76 00

20 00

68 00

71 00

02 00

42 00

25 00

86 00

41 00

85 00

41 00

20 00

91 00

19 00

CartTrack

625/2

(12) Bhimasar

626

MetalRoad

Trowers 785 P

671

670

Trowers 785 P

741

731

733

736

P CartTrack

101

(13 ) Pasuda

308

335

336

60 00

61 00

52 00

65 00

22 00

52 00

73 00

23 00

89 00

67 00

47 00

79 00

34 1379

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

338/2

(13) Pasuda(Contd. )

342

346

349

368/1

P CartTrack

380

45 00

78 00

16 00

[F. No. R-31015/47/2001 -OR- II] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 22 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 751.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की .उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 12 जुलाई 2003 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्याक का. आ. 1923, तारीख 09 जुलाई , 2003 द्वारा कतिपय भूमि में गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहनके लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30 अगस्त, 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची राज्य: गुजरात

जिला: पाटण

तालुका: सांतलपुर

सर्वेसंख्या

क्षेत्रफल

भाग यदि है तो

गाँव का नाम

3 1

203

(1) सांतलपुर

219

नाला पर

(2)

483

825

कार्टट्रेक

482

481

478

473

आर सेन्टी आर हेक्टर

89 00

86 00

39 00

37 00

33 1380

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

(3) छानसरा

116

कार्ट ट्रेक

194

16 00

70 00

17 00

पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक

(4) दईगामडा

127

29/2

(5 ) बामरोली

44/2

(6) डाभी

(7) उनरोट

100

(8) झेकडा

264

01 00

13 00

52 00

14 00

68 00

[फा. से. आर-31015/9/2002- ओआर- Ⅱ ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 22nd March, 2004

aturals. M S.O 7:51 . Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum Number S.O. 1923 , dated the 9th July 2003 , issued under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroler Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published the Gazette of India , dated the 12th July , 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in certain land for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of Crude Oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State ofGujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oli Pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);...

2003; And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 30th August, And whereas the competent authority has under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.;

And, further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the CentralGovernment, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District: Patan Taluka Santalpur

SurveyNo. PartifAny Name ofVillage

3 1

203

(1) Santalpur

219

State:Gujarat

ROU-Area

Ha.

Ar. Sq.mt.

89 00

04 1381

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Nala (2) Par

483

825

CartTrack

482

481

478

473

(3) Chhansara

116

Cart Track

P-CartTrack

194

(4) Diagamda

127

29/2

(5) Bamroli

44/2

(6) Dabhi

(7) Unrot

100

(8) Zekada

264

20.

[F. No. R-31015/9/2002-OR-II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 752.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तम्भ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्ति को उक्त अनुसूची के स्तम्भ (2 ) मेंकी तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में उल्लिखित क्षेत्रों की बाबत , उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है, अर्थात्:-

अनुसूची प्राधिकारी का नाम और पता

(1)

(i) श्री एन. रामा राव पटनायक,

सेवानिवृत्त स्पेशल ग्रेड डिप्टी कलेक्टर,

गुजरात स्टेट पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लि. ,

अजय निवास, 70-14-9/16,

सुंदर शिवा कालोनी, सिद्धार्थ नगर,

काकीनाडा-533033

अधिकारी क्षेत्र

(2)

आन्ध्र प्रदेश 1382

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

(1)

(2)

( ii ) श्री एस. नागी रेड्डी

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

सेवानिवृत्त डिप्टी कलेक्टर, गुजरात स्टेट पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लि. , अजय निवास, 70-14-9/16 , सुंदर शिवा कोलोनी, सिद्धार्थ नगर, काकीनाडा-533003

[फा. सं. एल-14014/63/03-जीपी ]

स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 23rd March, 2004

S.O 752. In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby authorizes the persons mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Schedule given below to perform the functions of the competent authority under the said Act, in respect ofthe areas mentioned in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Schedule:

S. No. Name of Person and Address

Area of Jurisdiction

(1)

(2)

(3)

Andhra Pradesh

(i) Mr. N. Rama Rao Patnaik, Rtd. Special Grade Deputy Collector, Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited, Ajay Niwas , 70-14-9/16 Sunder Shiva Colony, Siddarth Nagar , Kakinada-533 033

Andhra Pradesh

(ii ) Mr. S. Nagi Reddy, Rtd. Deputy Collector Land Acquisition , Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited, Ajay Niwas , 70-14-9/16 Sunder Shiva Colony, Siddarth Nagar , Kakinada-533 033

[F. No. L- 14014/63/03 -GP]

SWAMI SINGH, Director

नई दिल्ली, 23 मार्च, 2004

का.आ. 753.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई , भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 05 जुलाई , 2003 में प्रकाशित की गई, भारत सरकार के पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1838 तारीख 02जुलाई , 2003 द्वारा कतिपय भूमि में गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पैट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 30 अगस्त, 2003 का उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित हैं , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1383

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पैट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: कच्छ

तहसील: रापर

गाँव कानाम

सर्वे संख्या

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

भाग , यदिकोई है

नाला (1) गोविन्दपर

ट्रार्वस 98 पैकी

71/2

नाला

72/2

72/1 पैकी

नाला

76/3

ट्रार्वस 98 पैकी

66/1

ट्रार्वस 98 पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक

141/2

(2) देदरवा

116

117

103/2

ट्रार्वस 221 पैकी

80पैकी

हेक्टर

आर सेन्टी आर

50 00

55 00

62 00

35 00

54 00

77 00

22 00

00 00

56 00

32 00

55 00

05 00

50 00

24 00

17 00

06 00

74 00

33 1384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

435

(3) सई

357/1

362/1

120

111 पैकी

ट्रार्वस 892पैकी

591/5

(4) किडीयानगर

590/2

589/3

585

685

693/2

691/4

नाला

811/1

812/2

ट्रार्वस 1318 पैकी

ट्रार्वस 1318/11पैकी

947/2

947/1

ट्रार्वस 1318 पैकी

नाला

971/1 पैकी

970पैकी

968/1

ट्रार्वस 1318 पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक

1189/2

1188/2

1187/2

1187/1 पैकी

ट्रार्वस 1318 पैकी

नाला

ट्रार्वस 1318पैकी

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

63 00

32 00

61 00

10 00

62 00

39 00

24 00

07 00

25 00

12 00

55 00

83 00

59 00

50 00

92 00

18 00

60 00

22 00

62 00

.24

92 00

60 00

42 00

92 00

78 00

10 00

91 1385

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

(5) बादलपर

21/1

91/3

(6) छोटापर

पैकी

(7) वेकरा

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 129

944/1

(8) भीमासर

944/2

945/1

938/3

पैकी

952

921

908/3

कार्ट ट्रेक

795/2

781/2

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 2220/1

810/2

पैकी

812/1

819

825

836/2

835/2

835/3

843/2

844

853/2

पैकी

ट्रार्वस 2220/1

2191/1

2182

पैकी

2179/4

2175/2

2152/2

2151/1

पैकी

2146/2

826 G1/04-15

32 00

51 00

74 00

00,

6 00

66 00

94 00

01-

64 00

49 00

23 00

32 00

78 00

42 00

19 00

99 00

30 00

16 00

00 1386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

3 1

2129/1

(8 ) भीमासर (जारी )

2127

पैकी

2120/1

2119/2

2118

2116/2

2114/1

2112/2

2111/1

2110/2

2110/3

2109/1

2108/3

2210

2055/6

2055/7

पैकी

2054/4

पैकी

2051/3

पैकी

2051/2

2050/3

2049/3

2046/2

2042/2

2041/2

2038/5

पैकी

2037/4

2037/2

213

पैकी (9) भंगेरा - जदुपूर

219/2

कार्ट ट्रेक

183/1

645/1

(10). आदेसर

645/2

644/3

पैकी

643

642

629/7

629/9

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

76 00

28 00

54 00

12 00

52 00

46 00

66 00

17 00

14 00

10 00

29 00

48 00

.92 00

97 00

51 00

65 00

42 00

35 00

28 00

90 00

26 00

82 00

[फा. नं. आर-31015/10/2002- ओआर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 1387

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd March, 2004

S.O 753. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Number S.O. 1838 dated the 2nd July 2003 , issued under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and published in the Gazette of India dated the 5th July, 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in certain land for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of Crude Oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) ;

2003; And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 30th August, Andwhereas the competent authority has under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest, on the date of publication of this declaration , in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited),; free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District: Kutch

State:Gujarat

Taluka: Rapar

ROU-Area

PartifAny

SurveyNo.

Name ofVillage

Ha.

Ar. Sq. mt .

Nala

(1) Govindpar

Trowers 98 P

15 71/2

Nala

14 72/2

72/1

Naid

76/3

Trowers 98

Trowers98

01 66/1

Trowers 98

00 Trowers 98

CartTrack 1348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

141/2

(2) Godarasa

116

117

103/2

Trowers 221

435

357/1

362/1

120

111

Trowers 892

591/5

590/2

589/3

585

685

693/2

691/4

Nala

811/1

812/2

Trowers 1318

Trowers 1318/11

947/2

947/1

Trowers 1318

Nala

971/1

970

968/1

Trowers 1318

CartTrack

1189/2

1188/2

1187/2

[PART II SEC . 3( ii) ]

50 00

24 00

17 00

06 00

00 00

33 00

63 00

32 00

61 00

62 00

39 00

25 00

12 00

83 00

33 00

59 00

50 00

74 00

92 00

18 00

95 00

60 00

22 00

62 00

92 00

42 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1389

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

1187/1

(4) Kidiyanagar

Trowers 1318

(Contd.)

Nala

Trowers 1318

(5) Badalpar

21/1

91/3

(6) Chhotapar

(7) Vekara

Trowers 129

944/1

(8) Bhimasar

944/2

945/1

938/3

952

921

908/3

CartTrack

795/2

781/2

Trowers 2220/1

810/2

812/1

819

825

836/2

835/2

835/3

843/2

844

853/2

Trowers 2220/1

2191/1

2182

2179/4

2175/2

2152/2

2151/1

2146/2

2129/1

92 00

78 00

10 00

32 00

12 00

45 00

41 00

53 00

48 00

74 00

20 00

16 00

64 00

35 00

95 00

49 00

23 00

32 00

78 00

48 00

00:

26 00

30 00

16 00

22 00

09 00 1390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

2127

P (8) Bhimasar ( Contd.)

2120/1

2119/2

2118

2116/2

2114/1

2112/2

2111/1

2110/2

2110/3

2109/1

2108/3

2210

2055/6

2055/7

2054/4

2051/3

2051/2

2050/3

2049/3

2046/2

2042/2

2041/2

2038/5

2037/4

2037/2

213

(9) Bhangera Jadupur

219/2

CartTrack

183/1

645/1

(10) Adesar

645/2

644/3

643

642

629/7

629/9

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]

08 00

54 00

96 00

48 00

12 00

92 00

46 00

66 00

17 00

14 00

29 00

95 00

92 00

51 00

15 00

42 00

35 00

28 00

90 00

00 00

56 00

26 00

82 [F. No. R-31015 / 10/2002 -OR- II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secу.

1391 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 23 मार्च , 2004

का.आ. 754.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2965 , तारीख 09 अक्टूबर, 2003 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 18 अक्टूबर, 2003 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पानेवाड़ी ( मनमाड ) से मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इन्दौर ) तक भारत पैट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा मुम्बई - मनमाड पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 5 नवम्बर, 2003 का उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार का अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमिमें उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: मध्य प्रदेश

जिला : धार

तहसील: धार

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टयर

सर्वे संख्या

गाँव कानाम

0.1030

148/1, 148/2

1. सोरड्यापुरा

0.0960

156

0:1150

128

0.2700

2. पीरघाटी

15/1क, 15/1

0.1118

15/17, 15/2 }

0.1940

13/3

3. अम्बापुरा

0.0560

4. आड़ाबरडा

0.1445

5. जूनीडाल

0.0655

65/1.65/2

6. जामनझिरी

0,0606

58/1.58/2

0.0960

0.0760

65/3

0.0235

19/1, 19/2

7. कालीबेल

0.0220

24/1

0.1560

0.0097

10/1,10/2

0,0600

[फा. सं. आर-31015/36/2001- ओआर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 1392

[PART II SEC. 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

NewDelhi , the 23rd March, 2004

S.O 754. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , Number S.O. 2965 dated the 9th October 2003, issued under sub-section ( 1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 18th October, 2003, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai - Manmad Pipeline Extension Project from Panewadi (Manmad) in the State of Maharashtra to Manglya (Indore ) in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 5th November , 2003;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the saidAct, submitted report to the Central Government;

Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Dhar

District:Dhar

State: Madhya Pradesh

Area inHectare

SurveyNo.

Name ofVillage

0.1030

148/1, 148/2.

1. Sordyapura

0,0960

156

128

0.1150

0,2700

2. Pirgati

15/ 1K, 15/ 1K

0.1118

15/1G, 15/2K

}

0.1940

13/3

3. Ambapura

0,0560 4. Adabarda

0,1445 5. Junidhal

0.0655

65/1.65/2

6. Jamanjhiri

0,0606

58/1.58/2

0.0960

0,0760

65/3

0.0235 7. Kalibel

19/1, 19/2

0.0220

24/1

0.1560

0.0097

10/1, 10/2

0.0600

[F. No. R-31015/36/2001 -OR- II]

HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926.

1393

नईदिल्ली, 24 मार्च , 2004

अधिनियम , 1962 का.आ. 755.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1839 तारीख 02 जुलाई , 2003 , जो भारत के राजपत्र में करीख 5 जुलाई, 2003 को प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना के संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिभाइनरी लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की सुमनुषंगी ) द्वारा मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पचन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइप लाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और सक्षम अधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अनुसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड (हिन्दुस्तान पैट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की सपनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: बनासकांठा

तालुका: धानेरा

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

भाग यदि है तो

सर्वेसंख्या

गाँव कानाम

3 1

(1 ) खिंमत

पैकी

1055/1

333

सेन्टी आर

आर

हेक्टर

84 00

10 00

पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक

320

85 00

पैकीकार्ट ट्रेक

353

33 00

पैक़ी कार्ट ट्रेक

(2) वासदा

(3) मांडल

पैकी

(4) रामपुरा ( वाघपुरा )

(52+431)/6 (5 ) आलवाडा

सुकाल नदी

पैकी

110

112

पैकी

(1+2)/2

(6) कुंडी

पैकी

पैको

17/1 17/1

826 G1/04-16

86 00

10 00

04 00

31 00

21 00

55 00

[फा. नं. आर-31015/48/2003- ओआर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 1394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 24th March , 2004

S.O 755. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , Number S.O. 1839 , dated the 2nd July, 2003 , issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 5th July , 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Scheduled appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of Crude Oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State of Gujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra- Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited):

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 5th August, 2003;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted reportto the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( I ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest, on the date of publication of the declaration , in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE Taluka : Dhanera

District : Banaskantha

Partifany

SurveyNo.

Name ofVillage

( 1) Khinmat

1055/1

333

320

P-CartTrack

353

P-Cart Track

State: Gujarat

ROU -Area

Ha.

Ar. Sq.mt.

84 00

10 00

85 00

P-CartTrack

(2) Wasda

(3) Mandal

(4) Rampura (Vaghpura)

(5) Alwada

(52+ 431)/6

SukalRiver

110

112

P (6) Kundi

(1+2)/2

17/1

10 00

87 00

10 00

04 00

31 00

8888

55 00

[F. No. R-31015/ 48/ 2003 -OR - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1395

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च 004

का.आ. 756.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962. (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 4 जुलाई, 2003 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्याक का. आ. 1847 तारीख 04 जुलाई, 2003 द्वारा कतिपय भूमि में गुरु गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पैट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की समनुषंगी ) द्वारा मुन्द्रा- भटिंडा अपरिष्कृत तेल पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा पत्तन स्थित अपरिष्कृत तेल संस्थापन से पंजाब राज्य में भटिंडा तक अपरिष्कृत तेल के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 1 सितम्बर, 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विमिश्चय किया है;

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 6 की उप्रधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड ( हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड समनुषंगी ) में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: बनासकांठा

तालुका: कांकरेज

सर्वेसंख्या

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

भाग यदिहै तो

गाँव का नाम

पैकी

387

( 1 ) मांडला

408

पैकी

399/1

(2) जाखेल

आर सेन्टीआर हेक्टर

67 00

09 00

00 00

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

215/2

(3) शिरवाडा

214

02:

84 00

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

पैकी

211

01 00

07 00

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

211

267/2

270/2

557/1

654/1

पैकी

650

111

(4 ) चांगा

पैकी

312

290

पैकी

313

पैंकी

323

पैकी

324

329

330

पैकी

(5) अघगाम

60/2

21 00

47 00

54 00

57 00

00 00

43 00

70 00

44 00

23.

40 00

44 00

56 .00 1396

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA7, 1926

3 1

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

57/1

( 5 ) अघगाम (जारी )

पैकी

131/1

127

202/1

पैकी

(6) कुडवा

46/1

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

(7) विभानेसडा

12/2

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक (8 ) राजपुर

पैकी

141/3

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

141/3

पैकी

141/4

(9) काकर

172

174

193

188

.99

888

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

187

कार्ट ट्रेक

161

الله

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

229

233

265

277

280/2

पैकी

133

( 10 ) नेकोई

पैकी

131

212

00 00 88888888888 00 00 00 00 00

पैकी कार्ट ट्रेक

(11) पादरडी

पैकी

212

213

पैकी

213

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

पैकी

214

पैकी

217/1

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

पैकी

264/

पैकी

261

257/

258/

पैकी

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

195/2

(12) चिमनगढ़

190/3

189/1

00 00

06 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1397

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

179/1

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

(12) चिमन गढ़

178/1

178/2

पैकी

112

108/2

पैकी

108/2

21 00

93 00

00 00

40 00

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रक

109

पैकी (13) रतनगढ

103

पैकी (14) रवियाणा

पैकी

पैकी.

115

(15) खोडा

34/2

34/1

90 00

40 00

23 00

46 00

76 00

65 00

72 00

31 00

46 00

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

(16) खींमाणा

16.

पैकी

कार्ट ट्रेक

87/2

290/2

289

279

77 00

32 00

19 00

84 00

पैकी-कार्ट ट्रेक

330/1

10 00

67 [फो. नं. आर-31015/4/2002- ओआर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi, the 25th March, 2004

S.O 756. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Number S.O. 1847 , dated the 4th July , 2003 , issued under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the saidAct ) , published inthe Gazette of India dated the 5th July, 2003 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in certain land for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of Crude Oil from crude oil terminal at Mundra Port in the State ofGujarat to Bathinda in the State of Punjab through Mundra -Bathinda Crude Oil Pipeline by Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited ( a subsidiary of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited);

Andwhereas, copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 1st September , 2003 ;

Andwhereas , the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report to the Central Government ;

Andwhereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land isrequired for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of users therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Governmenthereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

1398

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of this declaration, in the Guru Gobind Singh Refineries Limited (a subsidiary ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited) , free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : Banaskantha Taluka : Kankrej

Name ofVillage

PartifAny

SurveyNo.

387

P (1) Mandala

408

399/1

(2) Jakhel

215/2

P-CartTrack (3) Sirwada

214

P-Cart Track

211

P-CartTrack

267/2

270/2

557/1

654/1

650

111

(4) Changa

312

290

313

323

324

329

330

'P (5) Adhgam

60/2

57/1

P-Cart Track

131/1

127

202/1

(6) Kundva

46/1

P-CartTrack (7) Vibhanesda

12/2

P-Cart Track

CartTrack (8) Rajpur

141/3

P-CartTrack

141/4

172

(9) Kakar

174

193

188

P-Cart Track

187

P-Cart Track

CartTrack

161

229

P-CartTrack

233

265

277

280/2

State:Gujarat

ROU-Area

Ar. Sq.mt. 4

86 00

68 00

.01

01 00

21 00

54 00

57 00

80. 00

00 00

43 00

10 00

70 00

09.

44 00

9% 00

00 00

32 00

13 00

29 00

50 00

36 00

97 00

10 00

02 00

48 00

22 00

80 00

40 00

88 00

91- 00

52 00

08 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1399

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

133

P (10) Nekoi

131

212

P-CartTrack (11) Padardi

212

213

P-Cart Track

214

217/1

P-CartTrack

264/2

261

257/1

258/3

P-CartTrack

195/2

(12) Chimangadh

190/3

189/1

179/1

P-Cart Track

178/1

178/2

112

108/2

45 00

16 00

36 00

27-

26. 00

81 00

16 00

20 00

27 00

44 00

10 00

14. 00

33 00

13 00

50 00

21 00

93 00

-12

48 00

P-CartTrack

109

(13) Ratangadh

103

P (14) Raviyana

115

(15) Khoda

34/2

34/1

P-Cart Track

(16) Khimana

66.

CartTrack

87/2

290/2

289

279

P-CartTrack

330/1

90 00

06 00

76 00

65 00

62 00

72 00

06 00

31 00

73 00

46 00

32 00

19. 00

10 00

[F. No. R-31015/4/2002-OR- II] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

1400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] श्रम मंत्रालय

08-04-1978. In the said branch , he maintained Saving BankAccount No. 1343 in the said branch , नई दिल्ली, 1 मार्च , 2004

That he fell sick in 1989 and he was treated under the hospital.

का.आ.757.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंधमें निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 67/94) को प्रकाशित करतीहै , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/85/94- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 1st March, 2004

That the Management informed the workman on 22-4-1991 that there was a debit balance in his S. B. Account No. 1343 due to clerical mistake and the same should be cleared. The workman agreed to pay the debit balance . As soon as the P. F. loan was sanctioned to him, the workman accordingly paid a sum of Rs . 5500/ -on 10-05-1991 being the debit balance of Rs. 5410/ --plus Rs . 90/- as interest. Afurther sum of Rs . 1278.19 towards interest was paidby theworkman on 09-08-1991 . Thereupon the management issueda certificate dt . 5-2-1993 confirming that there was no debit balance outstanding in the workmans S.B. Account . The workman deposited the aforesaid amount under the bona fide impression that he might have overdrawn from his S.B. Account during his mental sickness.Hewas drawing a salary of Rs . 4418.50 per month when his services were illegally terminated w.e.f. 19-03-1993 .

S.0.757 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 67/94) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , No. 2 , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-02-2004.

[No.-L- 12012/85/94-IR(B.II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

It has been further submitted that about 6 months from the clearance ofdebit, the charge sheet was issued by the Management to the workman on 2-11-1991 alleging that the workman had manipulated the figures in his S.B. AccountNo. 1343 by resorting to falsification of accounts and reccords and in furherance of such alleged manipulations of account, he misappropriated a sum of Rs.5410 belonging to the bank . The charge sheet specifically levelled is as follows :-

(a) That you manipulated the figures in your S.B. Account No. 1343 by resorting to falsification of accounts and record.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL : TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 67/94

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI

(b). That in furtherance of such manipulations of account , you misappropriated a sum of Rs . 5410/- belonging to the bank .

IN THE MATTER OF SANJAY KAPOOR

VERSUS

You have committed Gross misconduct within the meaning of clause No. 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement, 1966 and charge sheet was issued to him.

SYNDICATE BANK

Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. 12012/85/ 94- IR(B -2) , Central Governmentdt. 14th June , 1994 has referred the following question for adjudication . The point runs are as hereunder:-

It has been further submitted that the workman on 11-12-1991 replied to the charge sheet and denied all the allegations levelled against him in the said charge - sheet and said that the same was false , baseless , unfounded and nalicious as he was not deputed to work in the Savings Bank Deptt , handling the concerned ledger folio during the relevant period from 27-2-1990 10 06-07-1990 .

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank, New Delhi in dismissing Shri Sanjay Kapoor, Clerk from service w.e.f. 19-3-1993 is justified ? if not, to what relief is the said workman entitled to?"

It has been further subinitted that an enquiry officer was appointed on 11-1-1992 and after lapse of about 6 months , the enquiry officer issued notice to the workman on 28-07-1992 ,to appear on 08-08-1992 at 110.30 AM at Zonal Office . It was not written in the notice that he has to appear with his witnesses and documents . Unfortunately, The claimant has filed statement of claim . In his statement of claim, he has stated that he was appointed as a clerk by the Syndicate Bank on [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

the workman could not attend the proceedings on 08-08-1992 due to illness and a medical certificate of his illness was duly submitted to the management . Enquiry of 8-8-1992 is ex parte. The workman inspected the documents as stated in the list of documents on 19-08-1992.

It has been further submitted that the workman could not attend the enquiry proceedings on 21-09-1992 due to urgent personal work and for which leave was duly sanctioned to him but instead of adjourning the proceedings to some other date , the Enquiry Officer mala fidely fixed the proceedings at 2.30 P. M. on 21-09-1992 itselfand the enquiry was completed ex-parte . Though he was on leave on that date , the enquiry was conducted at the back of the workman and he was not given full opportunity to participate in the proceedings in gross violation of the principles of naturaljustice.

Ithas been further submitted that the enquiry officer deliberately and with malafide intention fixed the enquiry on 21-09-1992 though the employee was on leave on 21-09-1992 and the enquiry proceedings were completed on 22-09-1992 exparte and without a notice to the workman i.e. in clear violation of the principles of natural justice and the law laid down by the various Hon'ble High Courts and theHon'ble Supreme Court.

Ithasbeen further submitted that the enquiry officer did not give any opportunity to produce his withnesses . The intention of the enquiry officer was mala fide . The enquiry was started after more than one year at the time when he has paid the money drawn by mistake . All the records were in the knowledge of the bank if there were any manipulations then brought to have been informed after taking full payment of overdrawn amount. The bank has filed its written statement. The bank has denied some of the paras of statement of claim and given his own pleadings regarding some of the paragraphs . It is stated in the written statement that the enquiry was proper. He was given proper opportunity to represent but since he deliberately did not represent so the enquiry was completed on22nd November , 1992 ex parte . So it is admitted that the enquirywas completed ex parte and the workman was not given time to produce his witnesses.

The workman has filed rejoinder and he has denied all the allegations of the written statement and has further reiterated that the enquiry was ex parte and he was not allowed to produce his own witnesses .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused documents on the record . A notice has been sent to him that hewas to appear at 10.30 AM on 21-09-1992. When he did not appear at 10.30 , the proceedings were postponed for 2.30 PM . When he did not appear at 2.30 PM, the proceedings were fixed for the next date . I have gone through the enquiry report . Their appears to be haste in the enquiry report as only the management witnesses have 826 GI/04-17

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27; 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1401 beenexamined and conclusion has been drawn on the same. The workman has not given any opportunity to produce his own witnesses .

It issubmitted that in case it is supposed that he was not present on 22-09-1992 , then a notice ought to have beenserved on him by registered post or through his Head ofthe Department and he should have been given time to examine his own witnesses . The workman has cited High Court Gujarat 1980. It has been held that there is delay of 18 months in submitting charge-sheet . The delay is fatal and would consider denial ofjustice . In 1997 LLR 409 , Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held that there is charge of. dereliction'so the enquiry should be taken completely. The instatement judgement of the Supreme Court is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case inasmuch there was a delay of 18 months in submitting charge-sheet and no witness of the workman has been examined. The charge -sheet has been submitted after 18 months. In case there was any forgery that would have come to light when he was asked to make over payments . Over and above, he did not work in the Savings Department and as such, no question of manipulation in the record in his own handwriting arise . I have perused the papers where manipulation is said to have made . No report of the expert ofhandwriting has been taken.

Inview of the foregoing discussions , it is quite clear that the enquiry is ex parte and it has been held in haste. No opportunity to the workman has been given. The enquiry officer ought to have got the notice served on him, but ishas not been served and there is no proof. of it . So far as the back wages are concerned, the case is old one and theworkman himself has sought several adjournments. Insuch circumstances 50% back wages will meet the ends ofjustice . The award is replied thus:-

The action of the management of Syndicate Bank, New Delhi in dismissing Shri Sanjay Kapoor, Clerk from service w.e.f. 19-03-1993 is notjustified . The workman is entitled tobe reinstated from the date of termination ofhis service and he is entitled is get 50% back wages. Dated23-02-04

R. N. RAI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 1 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 758.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल. आई. सी. ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 147/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17012/50/97- आई.आर. ( बी- II) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 1402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] New Delhi , the 1st March, 2004

S.O. 758. In pursuancesuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 147/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , No. 2 , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on27-02-2004.

as envisaged under the Industrial Dispute Act . The workman was not appointed permanently. His appointment was contractual under clause (bb) of Sub- section 2 (00) Industrial Dispute Act. He was employed on temporary basis for a fixed period till the scheme of LIC was framed. The seheme ofLIC was framed according to the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India . His appointment was only for specific period of 85 days . He has not completed 240 days so the question of his regularisation or reinstatement does not arise .

[No. L- 17012/50/97-IR(B. -II]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

Theworkman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has disputed all the paragraphs of the written statement and has prayed that his services should be regularised. He wasappointed on permanent basis.

Heard arguments from the side of the management and perused the written arguments annexed with the record. The workman is not turning up since August , 2002. It appears that he has no interest .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL: TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRAPLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL I. D. No. 147/98

SATINDER PAL SINGH

IN THE MATTER OF VERSUS

Thelearned counsel for the management has argued that the workman has no interest . He has been served notice several times . He was not present on 1-8-2002 since then he has absented himself. The notices have been sent to him and it has been served on him but he still did not appear as he knows the fact of the case .

SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER L. 1. C. OF INDIA, D.O. - II

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 17012/ 50/97 , (IR-B - II ) dt. 29-06-1998 , has referred the following points for adjudication. The point runs are as here under:-

"Whether the offer of appointment given by the LIC of India to workman Shri Satinder Pal Singh as Temporary Asstt . is in conformity with the provisions of law ? If not, to what relief the workman isentitled ? "

Ifoverall case of the workman is taken, according to his version , he was appointed on 10-04-1996 and he was removed verbally on 7-8-1996 which shows that he worked for less than 4 months whereas the sections of the I.D. Act isapplicable when the service is completed for 240 days . In this case, the service is not completed for 240 days , hence no question of regularisation or reinstatement arises . Even ifthe workman has turned up and he has put his case even then he could not show that he worked for more than 85 days . For 25 (F) , the continuous work in a calendar month , of240 days is essential . This condition is not fulfilled. As such, the workman is entitled to no relief.

The point referred to is replied thus:-

The offer of appointment given by LIC of India to workman as Temporary Assistant is not according to the Provisions of Law. He is not entitled to any relief asked for:-

The Award is given accordingly.

Dated 26-02-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 1 मार्च, 2004

The claimant has filed statement of claim . It has been stated in the statement of claim , that the workman was appointed in the LIC of India after his name was requisitioned from the Employment Exchange for the post ofAsstt . in LIC of India. His name was sponsored under general category candidate . The workman was interviewed and selected by the Selection Board/Committee . He was posted at the Branch Unit - 11D, 1st floor, Veer Savarkar Block, Vikas Marg, Shakar Pur, Delhi - 110092 on 10-4-1996. His services were always found good and satisfactory. There was no blemish against him. His services were terminated verbally on 7-8-1996 without assigning any reason . No enquiry was held . No notice was given.

का.आ. 759.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम TheOpposite Party has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been submitted that the workman was a temporary workman . He was not a permanent regular employee and as such the question of absorption does not arise. Their exists no industrial dispute 1403

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

न्यायालय नं. 2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 95/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/266/ 95- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 1st March, 2004

That the workman was represented in such reconciliation proceeding by Union named UCO Bank Employees Association , no result came out of the Conciliation proceeding . His services were verbally terminated on 23rd April, 1994. He has joined the services on 1989. He has worked in 1990. He has worked from October, 1989 to September, 1990 Rs. 20 per day. He has worked from October, 19 90 to May, 1991 , Rs . 25/- perdayand afterwards Rs . 30/- per day.

S. 0.759 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref, No. 95/96) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, No. 2, New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of UCO Bank and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 27-02-2004.

[No. L- 12012/266/95- IR(B- 11 ) ]

C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

That appropriate records were kept by the bank for calculation of the days during which the workman has worked and only through that records his wages were calculated and paid by the bank. There was no regular peon. There was only one daftry. He performed the work of Peon and did various jobs like depositing the electricity bill, telephone duties . He puchased stationery of day to day and got photocopies done. He carried registers from one table to other. He has been victimized and harassed in an illegal and arbitrary manner. He deserves to be reinstated.

ANNEXURE

The opposite party has filed written statement.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL L. D. No. 95/96

IN THE MATTER OF RAM SARIKΗ

Versus

UCOBANK

TheMinistry ofLabour vide its letter No. 12012/266/ 95 dt . 1-10-1996, the following points has been referred adjudication. The point runs are as hereunder:-

All theparas of statement ofclaim have beendenied. It has been stated that he was working on a fixed daily wages. He was a contractual worker and when the contract came to an end, he was verbally asked not to come. There is no question of retrenchment. In AIR 1992 , page 789 , it has been held that the regularisation of servies of the daily wage person is illegal and improper. It is against law also . He was never an employee of the bank and he has never worked for, 240 days in one calendar year. Such daily rate employee cannot be regularised . The employment is made from calling names of Employment Exchange. In this case, such name has not been asked for . The plumbers , electricians are called for on contractual basis and when the work is over, they are verbally asked not to come. This workman was also employed on contractual basis . He was not an all in bank's service .

"Whether the action of the management ofUCO Bank Noida in terminating the service of Shri Ram Sarik, dailywages Peon w.e.f. 23-4-1994 isjust and legal ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

The claimant has filed rejoinder. In rejoinder, he has denied all the paras of written statement and he has stated that he was a regular employee .

Heard arguments from both the parties and perused the documents annexed with the record.

The workman has given a statement of his work but that has not been admitted by the bank . He has only shown how much rupee he has received. He has not shown for how many days he has worked. In his statement of claim as well, he has not stated anywhere that he has worked for 240 days in a calendar year.

The claimant has filed statement of claim. In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the workman has completed 240 days till the termination w.e.f. 23-4-1994. It has been further submitted that his tenure of continuous service , he was forced to receive his wages in fictitious name by the management of the branch of the bank on certain concoctedpretexts . The workman was compelled to receive such wages in the fictitious name . He did so otherwise his services will be terminated.

Itwas agrued on behalf of the management that the oral evidence of the workman is very material for deciding this case . It is not the case of the workman that he has done 240 days in calendar year. No such document has That on 20-11-1993 , the Branch Manager, UCO Bank directed the workman verbally to draw his wages in ficititious name but the workman disagreed and he decided to approach ConsiliationOfficer.

1404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

beenfiled with record. He has not himself shown anywhere that he has worked for more than 240 days . He has only mentioned the money which he has received from the bank . In his oral examination, he has admitted that he used tobring water in the bank. He was paid his wages sometimes after a week or sometimes after a month depending upon thework available . The work was taken by him in different name of the persons but he could not deliver the names of the persons for whom work was taken by him . This indicates that no work was taken by any fictitious person otherwise he would have known their names . He has also admitted in the written statement that sometimes he used to present at the time when the cash was being handled and regular peon used to be on leave . He has further admitted that he was paid his wages on daily basis from Rs . 20/- and it was raised upto Rs . 30/- . According to his own statement he brought water from the bank and he was called when the peon was on leave. It indicates that there was a peon .

The learned counsel for the workman drew my attention to FIR 438. He has got no appointment letter, so it cannot be said that he was on a fixed pay so this citation is not applicable. AIR 1986 - SC Page 132, referring 25.F and 2A, he has worked for 240 days so this citation is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case , AIR 1996 - SC Page 1001 , Section 25 (F) it is not applicable . It has beenheld in this case that under Section 2(00) termination is not retrenchment and not illegal so the citation is not applicabe.

In view of the above discussions , it is clear that the workman was neither appointed on a fixed pay nor he has completed 240 days . According to his own statement , he brought water for the bank and when the peon was on leave , he was called . It indicates that whenever the bank needed , they took his services on contractual basis . He has no right to regularisation . The point referred to is repliedthus: -

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2004- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ]

एन. पी . केशवन, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the Ist March , 2004

S. O. 760.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award of the National Industrial Tribunal , Mumbai ( Complaint NTB No. -02 of1999 filed under Section 33 -A in the matter of ref. No. NTB - 1 of 1997) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bajaj Electrical Limited and their workmen, which was receivedbythe Central Government on 25-09-2003 .

[No. L-22013/1 /2004- IR(C.I1 )]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE NATIONAL INDUSTIRAL TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI

Present :

Shri Justice S. C. Pandey PresidingOfficer

COMPLAINT NTB No. 02 OF 1999 (Arising out of Ref. NTB- 1 of 1997) PARTIES:

Shri R.K. Bhatia :

Applicant

V/s.

Bajaj Electricals Ltd. Opp. Party

APPEARANCES :

: Mr. Chidambaram, President Forthe applicant

: Mr. M.S. Paranjpe , Adv.

for the Opp. party

The action of the management of the UCO Bank , NOIDA in terminating the serices of Shri Ram Sarikh, daily wager peon w.e.f. 23-4-1994 is just and legal. the claimant is not entitled to any relief asked for .

Dated 23-02-04

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 1 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 760.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बजाज इलेक्ट्रीकल लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुम्बई के पंचाट ( राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण में शिकायत नम्बर 02/1999 धारा 33 ए के अंतर्गत औद्योगिक विवाद संख्या एन.टी.बी. - 1 / 1997 ) को State

: Maharashtra

Mumbai , dated the 10th Day of September , 2003

AWARD

1. This is a complaint under section 33 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Act for short) arising out of Reference No. NTB - I of 1997.

2.The complainant is R.K. Bhatia (the workman for short) . The workman has filed this complaint against the Bajaj Electricals Ltd. 45-47 V.N. Road, Mumbai and oneB.S. Katariya.

1405

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

company. The workman stated that sometimes he was required to do the job of setting Diesel Pumps sets alongwith the sales executive V.K Sharma. He stated that even after the closure of sale ofDiesel pump sets, hewas required to go out for his duties. He stated that his duties were not specified. He had to attend Court, file tax returns etc. He admitted that his superior Shri P. K Mukherjee hadwritten letters Exhibits B and C to the written statement recommended that his application (Exhibit A) for grant of scooter allowance be considered favourably. He admitted thatconveyance allowance was also given to him alongwith scooter allowance.

3.The complainant claims that he was the permanent workman of the company. He was working at Lucknow branch office ofthe company. it was stated by the workman that he was granted reimbursement of conveyance expenses for maintaining a scooter from September 1986 as per order dated 14th October, 1986. He stated that this order was withdrawn by order dated 16th April 1999 (Annexure A to the application) the order was during pendency of reference- 1 of 1997. No permission of the tribunal was obtained. Hence this complaint . It was said that this tribunal should pass an award in favour of the complaint holding that pursuant to order dated September 1, 1986 the complainant should be given reimbursement of in respect of maintenance of scooter and expenses of petrol(scooter allowance for short).

7. Shri .Katariya had filed his affidavit . He stated that theworkmanwas given Scooter allowance because hewas utilizing his scooter for the work of the company. The companyclosed its depot at Kanpur. The activity ofsale of diesel pumps also stopped . The complainant was not required to visit the customers and the transport companies atLucknow. The scooter allowance granted to the workman waswithdrawn when it came to notice ofthe company that he was no longer using his scooter for the company. However, the company had never asked the workman to refund ofany amount . The company rectified its mistake. Itwas stated that the act of company did not amount to change in service conditions of the workman . Section 33(1 )(a) of the Act is not attracted as permision was not necessary. There was no change in the conditions ofservice ofthe workman .

4. In its written statement the company stated that workman is not entitled to raise this dispute before this tribunal because Labour Court, Ahmedabad was seized of the matter numbered as Reference (Lacd 5 ) 47 of 1995. This issue could not be raised before this tribunal . On merits issuance of order dated September 1 of 1986 was not disputed. It was stated that a representation was made by thebranchManager, Kanpur that the workman was entitled reimbursement ofPetrol as he was utilizing his scooter for promoting sale ofthe goods of the company and therefore , Shri A.K. Sahu passed the order of grant of reimbursement 1st September, 1986. It was said that in the year 1996 , the company shifted its branch office from Kanpur to Lucknow. The company had stopped sale of diesel/pump Engine in 1987. The workman was being given the reimbursement for utilizing of his scooter for sale activities .He was, therefore, not given the scooter allowance by order dated 16th April, 1999. There was no alteration in the condition of service of the workman. In any case there was no alteration in the conditions ofservice to the prejudice ofthe workman.

8. It is not disputed that a complaint under section 33 -A of the Act can be filed for contravention of the provisions ofsection 33 of the Act . It is also not in dispute that workman was granted scooter allowance by order dated 14th October 1986 (Exhibit B) with effect from 01-09-1986. It has been brought to the notice of this tribunal that a demand regarding reimbursement ofpetrol expenses was madeby itemNo. 28 in the demand notice ofthe Federation. it is pending for consideration by this tribunal in ref. NTB No. 1 of 1999. It is not in dispute that by order dated 16-04- 1999 the scooter allowance was withdrawn.

5. The complainant filed his affidavit in support of his case.He was cross examined . Thereafter, the company filed the affidavit of Shri B.S. Katariya. At the request of Shri Chidambaram the matter was heard finally as he did not want to cross examine Shri Katariya .

9. The question is if there was any contravention of section 33 of the Act. It is not in dispute that reference NTB No.1 1997 is pending between the workmen ofBajaj Electrical Ltd. and their workmen representedby the Federation. Therefore , this matter of withdrawal of scooter allowance is connected with the dispute pending before this tribunal. It cannot also be disputed that the workman is concerned with the dispute as the Reference NTB No. 1 of1997 is for fulfilment of demands made by the Federation forbetterment of conditions of service of all workmen . It cannot bedisputed that the workman was receiving scooter allowance at the time ofthe making ofReference No. NTB No.. 1 of 1997. It was continued to be paid and was withdrawn only by order dated 16-4-1999 . This withdrawal of the scooter allowance shall amount to altering the conditions of service of the workman to his prejudice 6. The workman has stated in his affidavit that he was employed as a commercial Asstt . He stated that he had retired from Kanpur. He was granted scooter allowance from 1st September, 1986. The company withdrew it by orderdated 16th April , 1999. The order was arbitrary as no opportunity was given to him to explain his position. Nor was any notice of change was given . The company had not taken permission of the tribunal. The demand No. 28 in the industrial dispute pending before this tribunal is in respect of similar allowance granted to him. Therefore, permissionofthe tribuanl was required . The workman was cross examined. The workman admitted that he retired from Lucknow branch of the company. On 14-9-96 the company shifted its office to Lucknow. He admitted that sale of pumps and Diesel sets was discontinued by the 1406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

11. The argument made by Mr. Chidambaram is that the order dated 16-4-99 is void ab initio for non- compliance of section 9 -A of the Act . Mr. Pranjpe argued that that section 9 -A of the Act did not apply in terms .

12. Section 9 A of the Act prohibts an employer ( i ) from making a proposed change in the conditions of service of any workman covered by the Fourth Schedule ( ii) unless and unitl he gives notice to the workman likely tobe affected by such change a notice in prescribed manner the nature of proposed change effected, ( iii ) and unitl 21 days have expired from date ofgiving notice .

13. It is not in dispute that terms of section 9 - A of the Act were not complied with. The question is, if the payment of the scooter allowance can be treated as condition of service within the meaning of Section 9 of the Act. Schedule Fourth can be treated as part of section 9 -A ofthe Act for the purpose of interpretation . The items No. ( 1)(3) and (8) of the Fourth Schedule are in respect ofWages, compensatory and other allowances and withdrawal of any customary concession or privilege or change in any usage.

without obtaining permission of this tribunal prior to passing of the order of withdrawal . The consequence is that there is breach of section 32 (1 ) ( a) of the Act . There is contravention of section 33 - A entitling the workman to file the complaint . The argument that the Scooter allowance was granted under a mistake and therefore , the conditions of service of the workman cannot be said to be altered to his prejudice has to be rejected. Right or wrong , if the workmanwas receiving certain monetary benefit it cannot be withdrawn on the ground that conditions of service are not altered thereby to the prejudice of the workman . Any withdrawal of monetary benefit shall amount to altering the conditions of service to prejudice of the workman. It is baffling to understand why the company failed to obtain the permission of this tribunal if it was such an apparent case of correcting a mistake . Everybody is equal before the law, even though some persons may think that they are more than equal . This tribunal is of the firm opinion that the employer cannot unilaterally alter the conditions ofservice of a workman to his prejudice on the ground that the benefit given to the workman as a condition of service was granted under a misapprehansion. This view of the matter, avoids the contingency that employer shall by a judge in his own cause . The authorities mentioned in 33 (i ) of the Act can decide , if permission is necessary and can grant it ifjustice so requires.

14. Section 2( rr ) of the Act defines wages to mean remuneration capable ofbeing expressed in terms ofmoney payableto workman in respect of employment or the work done in such employment provided the terms of employment expressed or implied were fulfilled. This definition is further expanded to include inter alia the (i ) allowances a workman is entitled to or the time being, ( ii ) any traveling concession . Thus , the scooter allowance in thiscase is in two parts: The first part allows reimbursement of petrol expenses actually incurred by the workman for using the scooter for the work of the company. The second part is for maintenance of the scooter. It is clear that the workman was given this benefit because he was performing the work of the company and was paid the expenditure incurred by him for petrol and the incidental expenses for maintaining the scooter. Both of the aforesaid items appear tobe covered by the main part of Section 2( rr ) of the Act as reimbursement amounts to remuneration payable in respect ofwork done. If the amount given to the workman is treated as a special allowance then expended part of definition covering all allowances will come into play. The allowance canalso be treated as treveling concession . However, it is not necessary to dwell further because in the opinion of this tribunal the scooter allowance is covered by the main partof Section 2 ( rr ) of the Act . Now it cannot be disputed thatthe conditions of service of workman shall be changed by reduction in the amount of the wage that he was receiving by way of allowance . Section 9 -A of the Act is attracted if there is violation of item ( i ) or (3 ) of Fourth Schedule. To be specific , it would item No. 3 , which speaks ofallowances .

15. The argument of the learned counsel for the company that there was no change in the conditions of the service cannot be accepted . The tribunal has considered 10. The next question that has to be determined is , if the complainant is entitled to relief of payment of scooter allowance from the date of withdrawal till his retirement . It has been argued that on making the application dated 16-9-86 Ex - A ( to the written statement) that workman be given reimbursement allowance for maintaining his scooter and petrol expenses. It is this application that has been allowedby order dated October 14, 1986. It is no longer in dispute the Branch Manager Shri P.K. Mukherjee by letter dated 24-9-1986 recommended his case and again pressed for grant of scooter allowance by letter dated 24-10-1986. It is also clear that the Branch Manager has also stated that Scooter was being utilized for the company's work . Ifthat be the fact then reference to circular P.A.D. 20503dated 08-5-86 was wrong . The workman was not covered by that circular. He was not an Officer. The mention of the circular in the order of grant would not make the order of grant invalid , particularly when it was cited upon by mistake by one opposite party. A unilateral mistake of one of the parties should be such as it goes to the root ofthe matter rendering a grant or a contract invalid or oppsed to public policy. Merely because on hindsight the mention of circular helps the employer he cannot claim that the contract was void ab initio . On the other hand the workman can claim that the grant of scooter allowance in this case attracts the principles of promissory estoppel or equitable estoppel so far as the company is concerned . In the opinion of this tribunal , the company has rightly conceded that it did not want to recover the scooter allowances already paid by ittill 16-4-99.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1407

औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 131/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

the case ofAyodhya Prasad Vs. The Eligin Mills Company Ltd. , 1994 LLR 126, K. Devendran Vs. Surgrami Callories Company 1999( 1 ) LLN 149 Workman of Indian Bank Fs . IndianBank 1995 LLR 355. These cases are distinguishable.

[सं. एल-40012/ 14/91- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्कअधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 761.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 131/91 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M. T. N. L. and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 3-3-2004 .

[No. L-40012/ 14/91 -IR(DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

16. It cannot be disputed that compliance of Section 9 -A of the Act is mandatory when there is a proposed change in the condition of service ofworkman. It has been argued that workman was not entitled to receive the amount because admittedly the Sales Office at Kanpur was closed and workman was not required to work at Lucknow. It appears to this tribunal that the company cannot take that stand before this tribunal because the order dated 16-4-99 withdrawing the payment of scooter allowance is void ab initio for non -compliance of Section 9 -A of the Act . Janta Co-operative Sugar . Mills Ltd. Vs. Labour Court (1987) Lab IC 1093. Further, the company cannot go beyond its order dated 16-4-99 which was passed after due deliberation and the legal advice received from the Advocate who was consulted before passing the order. The company cannot bepermitted to take a different stand before this Tribunal .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEWDELHI.

L.D. No. 131/91

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI IN THE MATTEROF: - SMT. SUSHMA RANI

VERSUS

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-40012/ 14/ 91- IR(DU) has referred the following point for adjudication. The points runs as hereunder:-

"Whether the action of the management of Divisional Engineer (Phones ) , MTNL, Kidwai Bhawan, New Delhi in dismissing Smt . Sushma Rani , Short Duty TelephoneOperator w.e.f. 24-1-1986 wasjustified ? If not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

17. The workman has stated that he was receiving Rs . 300/- per month for maintenance of scooter and actual expenses for petrol to the extent of 30 litres. There appears to be no dispute between the parties . The result of the aforesaid discussion that order dated 16-4-99 is declared tobe illegal and consequently the workman shall be entitled to receive the expenses for maintenance of scooter at rate of Rs . 300/- per month from the month of May 1999 to 1st April 2001 for maintenance of scooter . The workman has stated that he was receiving Rs . 300/ -per month for maintenance of scooter and actual expenses for petrol to the extent of 30 litres . There appears to be no dispute between the parties in this question . The company shall also reimburse him to the extent of 30 litres of petrol for each month between May 1999 to April 2001 on the basis ofactual price of petrol provided the workman makes a claim, by filing the petrol vouchers for the aforesaid period showing that he had used the petrol up to thirty litres per month . It is made clear that 30 litres per month is the maximum to which the workman is entitled. Nothing in this award shall prevent him from claiming less than 30 litres if he had utilized less than 30 litres in a nonth . An award is accordingly made. A copy of this award submitted to the Central Govt . for publication under provisions of this Act in accordance with the requirement of Section 33 -A ofthe Act.

S. C. PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

The claimant has filed statement of claim. It hasbeen stated in the statement of claim that the workman was appointed as Short Duty Telephone Operator w.e.f. 19-10-1982 in the Office of Assistant Engineer, Phones, Kidwai Bhawan, New Delhi. She performed her duties continuously and to the satisfaction of her superiors . She also underwent three months training as short duty telephone operator. She also passed the examination on 20thOctober, 1984, but she was not regularised though all others were regularised.

का. आ. 761. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार महानगर टेलीफोन निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार

It has been further stated that the workman became pregnant during 1984 and had a lot of complications in the early period of pregnancy she had to take short leave quiteoften on account ofher ill - health. On 25-1-1985, a son 1408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) )

be entitled to get the benefit of 25(F) of the I.D. Act. was born to the workman by caesarian operation . For her complications , she has to remain absent . She has applied for leave along with medical certificates . The same were sent through her colleagues.

That the management did not receive the letters along with medical certificate sent by the workman . The management never objected to the leave applied for or directed her to appear before any medical board or Civil Surgeon.

That on 03-02-1986 , the workman has been absenting. A letter was sent by the management and it has also stated in that letter that the workman had not cared to respond to warning letters alleged to have been issued on 1-7-1985 , 15-07-1985 , 28-11-1985 and 24-11-1986 and her serviceswere, therefore, terminated with immediate effect .

That the claimant has filed rejoinder. In rejoinder, all the paragraphs of the written statement have been denied. It has been said that the preliminary objections are misconceived . She absented herself due to the circumstances beyond her control . Heard arguments from both the sides . It was argued from the side of the workman that she has undergone short duty training and she was onthe list ofemployees . Some of the employees junior to her has been regularised but she has not been regularised. It was argued from the side of the management that she has inalldone the work for 9 to 10 days . Though she has been given training of short duty operator but she has not completed 240 days work. She has been given appointment letter. In the appointment letter as well , it has mentioned that she has been appointed on short duty telephone operator and will get Rs . 2.75 per hour remuneration maximum for 8 hours . My attention was drawn to 1983 LAB . I.C. 787. This citation is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . LLJ - II , 1993 , page 697 is regarding enquiry. This case is also not applicable as she was given full opportunity. 1987 LAB I.C. -307 is also regarding enquiry. Enquiry in this case has been held as such. This citation is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case .

It has been further submitted that she has not received any of such letters. She has suffered great agony due to complications ofcaesarian. The circumstances were beyond her control . By letterdt. 27-2-1986, the workman was directed to attend office within the week's time and explain the reasons for not attending office personally. It has been submitted that the workman presented herself but a departmental enquiry was instituted against the workman vide order No. E -32/SS/85-86/ 109 dt . 4-6-1986 without either putting the workman under suspension or taking her on duty, as a pre - requisite condition for holding an enquiry proceeding against the alleged misconduct . It has been further submitted that the workman objected to that and she participated in the enquiry and co - operated with the E.O. but her case was not considered sympathetically and her services were terminated. She was not given compensation under Section 25 (F) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The enquiry conducted is void . No charge has been issued to her. The workman ought to have been suspended and during her suspension, the enquiry should have been held.

AIR 1960 SUPREME COURT PAGE 100. This citation is at all not related with the facts and circumstances of this case. Similarly, AIR 1966 SC- 115 AND 1981 LABI.C. 806 relateto different matters and so they are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case. LLJ - II - 70 is regarding retrenchment . The workman has not done 240 days of work so the question of retrenchment does not arise . 2000 (84 ) FLR- 728 is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case . LLJ 1977 is also not applicable because it is regarding the contractual term of employment . It was argued from the side of the workman that the list was prepared of those who were given short telephone operator training. The fault of the applicant was that she was absent due to the circumstances over which she has no control and the juniors to him has been given appointment so her case is also considered , if not , regularisation or reinstatement at least she should be considered for re-employment .

Thepoint referred to is replied thus :---

The action of the management of Divisional Engineer (Phones ) M.T.N.L. , Kidwai Bhawan , New Delhi in dismissing Smt . Sushma Rani , Short Duty Telephone Operator w.e.f. 24-1-1986 is justified. She may approach the manageinent for re -employment and the management will consider her case for re -employment. She is neither entitled to regularisation nor reinstatement but in view of the list , she is certainly entitled for re -employment without any back wages due.

Dated:-23-02-04

The management has filed written statement on behalf of the employer to the statement of claim . In his written statement , it has been stated that the duties of the workman is purely temporary and casual in nature and will confer no right or claim whatsoever and it has been mentioned in the appointment letter that in case of lapse or misconduct during the course of service, the name of the workman will be removed from the list . The departmental enquiry was held and she was found guilty of misconduct . It has been further submitted that her misconduct has been proved by departmental enquiry. Witnesses have been examined. The post of short duty telephone operator has been abolished and the relief in terms of the prayer for reinstatement is infructuous and impracticable . The paras of the statement of claim have been denied and the list has been appended with the statement of claim for which it has been shown that in 1984 , she reported on duty for 7 days . In 1985 , she reported for duty for 4 days . That was the work done by the workman . She has not completed 240 days of serviceto

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer 1409 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 762.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार महानगर टेलीफोन निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केबीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है; जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

w.e.f. 4-3-1991 without complying with the provisions of Section 25 -F of the I.D. Act . He made representation but thatwas not heard . Thereafter he filed the application before the Conciliation Officer but that too failed so he filed this statement of claim . His services were terminated on the allegations levelled against him by certain over zealous employees named Rajpal and malakhan Singh Chowkidar, Telephone Exchange , Nehru Place , New Delhi who had. falsely implicated in a theft case.

[सं. एल-40012/112/92- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

Ithas been further submitted that the workman was onduty at Telephone Exchange , Nehru Place , NewDelhi . On 04-03-1991 , the above named employees cooked up a story and called the police and planted telephone cable on the workman which was infact under the custody of the store keeper. Thus, he has been victimized . The case was registered against him. He has been working in the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited since 1981-82 and ever had a occasion when any finger was pointed on him .

S.O. 762. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 76/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M.T.N.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on03-03-2004.

[No. L-40012/ 112/ 92 - IR(DU) ]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL L D. NO . 76/93

In the matter of : BRAHMJEET VERSUS

Thatthe services of the workman has been terminated w.e.f. 04-03-1991 without assigning any reason thereof. No writtentermination orders were served upon the workman. He was simply denied the work . The management was in connivance of those employees fabricated a false case of theft against the workman. They filed an FIR bearing No. 117/91 dt . 4-3-1991 and later on he was bailed out on 12-03- 1991. He gave application for permitting him to join his services but he was refused and he was threatened that several cases will be registered against him . The action of the management is malafide . No letter of suspension has been served on him . That was a case of simple termination . The departmental enquiry is necessary. He was a regular and permanent employee and he worked for 240 days . Demand notice was served on the management . The management took no interest. The attitude of the management was vindictive and revengeful . The allegations oftheft were false . It is , therefore , prayed that he should be reinstated in service .

M.T.N.L.

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L-40012/ 112/ 92/ IR/DU , Central Government dt . 30-09-1993 has referred the following point for adijudication . The points runs are as hereunder:-

"Whether the action of the Management of Mahangar Telephone Nigam Limited in terminating the services of Shri Brahmjeet , daily rated Mazdoor w.e.f. 4-3-1991 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

The mariagement has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been submitted that the workman was engaged as daily rated Mazdoor and his services were required for loading and unloading goods in the vehicles . He was a Muster Roll Holder . He was absent from duty w.e.f. 1-3-1991 . He never reported for duty after 28-02-1991 . He has not signed the Muster Roll. Thus , there was no occasion of deputing him to any other place . It has been further submitted that on 04-03-1991 , he stole telephone cables and an FIR No. 117/91 has been lodged against him and he was in jail from 04-03-1991 to 12-3-1991 . After coming from the jail , he made representations but the management was not in the knowledge of the fact of lodging ofanFIR. The claimant sent an application dt. 27-2-1991 for reinstatement which was rejected. He denied allegations vide his communication received on 4-5-1991 and chose to stay away from duty. A theft case was registered against him. He had clearly deserted/abandoned the job . He was The claimant has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim , the workman was employed as adaily rated Mazdoor by the Management of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited at Kedwai Bhawan , New Delhi from July, 1981 to 3-3-1991 . He worked for more than 240 days in 12 calendar months . His services were terminated

826 G1/04-18 1410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

Court in the offence which was registered against him so there is no blemish against him and it was in the knowledge ofthe management as the Chowkidar has filed FIR under Section 379/411 IPC .

daily rated wager and his services come to an end when he does not report . He was injail w.e.f. 4-3-1991 to 12-3-1991 . Thereafter he raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer but the dispute also failed so the question was referred for adjudication. All the allegations of the claim has been denied in the written statement . It is submitted that he was daily rated worker when he did not turn up his services came to an end . It has been admitted that he was on the Muster Roll.

From the side of the workman , my attention was drawn to 1994 SC cases , 671 , in which it has been held that the back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement should be granted . In 1987- Supreme Court page-36 it has been held if the retrenchment was bad, it should be set aside . In 1977-2 , FIR, it has been held that if the accused had not been found guilty, he should be reinstated. In 1987 ( 1 ) LLJ -85 , it has been held that under Section 25 (F ) to a daily rated worker, compensation should be awarded. These citations are fully applicable in the cases of the workmen . He has been declared innocent by the Court. No retrenchment notice has been given. In such circumstances , at least when he was held not guilty by the court , he should be taken into service .

The workman has filed rejoinder and in the his rejoinder, he has denied all the allegations of the written statement and he has stated that he was not a daily rated worker but he was a permanent employee . A false case was registered against him . Due to that false case , he was not taken into service . He has been served no notice . His services have not been retrenched . His implication in the criminal case is false and just at the instance of the management .

Thepoint referred to is replied thus :-

Heard agruments from both the sides and persued the documents on record .

The action of the management of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited in terminating the services of Shri Brahmjeet, daily rated Mazdoor w.e.f. 4-3-1991 is neither legal nor justified: The claimant deserves to be reinstated at the post at which he was working . He was a daily rated worker so he is entitled to get 50% back wages also .

Dated: 26-02-2004

R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

The learned counsel for the workman has stated that the FIR was registered under Section 375 , 411 but the Hon'ble Court has acquitted him since there is acquittal from the Hon'ble High Court . The FIR lodged against him is false. There is no question of theft against him.but Section 379/411 indicates that he admitted to commit theft. It is submitted that he was working in Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Linuted at Kidwai Bhawan, New Delhi from July, 1981 to 3-3-1991 . Thus , he has completed 240 days service .

का. आ. 763.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कैन्टीन स्टोर्स डिपार्टमेन्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 11 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 89/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-14012/13/93- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 20t) 4

Though he has been said to be daily wager but a person who works for 10 years in an Undertaking, he cannot be said to be a daily wager . It has been admitted that his name was on muster roll , he was given no notice of retrenchment that may be on the ground of the FIR under which he remained in jail for 12 months but the Hon'ble Court hasdeclared him not guilty so he has been found innocent . In the written, he admitted that he was daily rated mazdoor . The management has not filed as to for how long period, he worked . As such , in the statement of claim that he was serving in Malianagar Telephone Nigam Limited from July. 1991 to 3-3-1991 is to be believed and he has worked for more than 240 days .

S.O. 763. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 89/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canteen Stores Deptt. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on03-03-2004 .

The counsel for the workman argued that he was daily rated mazdoor and when his services were no longer required, he was not called for work since the worker has worked for more than 240 days , the notice of retrenchment is to be given. He cannot be taken into service as there is a criminal case against him but when he was declared innocent in that criminal case , their remains no charges against him. Since notice of retrencement has not been served and he has completed for more than 240 days , so his service cannot be dispensed with since he has been held not guilty by the

[No. L - 14012/ 13/ 93 - IR(DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1411

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-II,

NEWDELHI

LD . NO . 89/1994 PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI

IN THE MATTER OF :-SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA

VERSUS

HEAD QUARTER MEERUT SUB AREA CANTEEN, MEERUTCANTT.

AWARD

TheMinistry ofLabour vide its letter dt . 29-06-1994 hasreferred the following point for adjudication. The point referred to runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Canteen Stores Deptt. , in terminating the services of Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, son of Shri Raghuwar Dayal Sharma, Ex-Salesman w.e.f. 30-01-1991 is legal and justified. Ifnot, what relief he is entitledto?.

The claimant has filed the statement of claim . It has beensubmitted in the statement ofclaim that Headquarters Meerut Sub-Area Canteen is a unit run canteen (HRC) functioningunder Army Headquarters 'Q' Branch Master General and is registered with Canteen Stores Department (CSD) and its registration number is 2309. This canteen is engaged in the business of sales of various goods and items ofdailyuse ofhuman need . The services are meant for public as well as defence personnels and thus the sub- area canteen comes within the purview of ' Industry' as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and the concerned workman comes within the purview of "workman".

Hewasappointed on 26-11-1969 and was the member of EPF and FEF scheme . It has been further submitted that his conduct and work was satisfactory and he performed his duties sincerely for continuous 21 years and there was no complaint of any misbehaviour by any customer. His services were terminated by Order dt . 30th January, 1991 in very abrupt and illegal manner on the plea ofcertain misconduct.

That it has been further submitted that before terminating the services, the employer served a show cause notice dated 11th September, 1990 in which several charges of misconduct as unsatisfactory performance as a salesman, discourteous and rude behaviour with the customers and very rude in subordinate and disobedient to the management has been fastened, but no date and time or place and name of person has been given in the notice.

That the workman filed his explanation on 15-09-1990 and tried to prove himself not guilty and said that the charges were false . The management without considering the explanation , passed order of termination in a very abrupt and illegal manner like a mechanical process.

It has been further added that no legal and valid domestic enquiry constituted nor conducted nor any best and admissible evidence against the concerned workman produced. The alleged show-cause notice cannot take the place of full - fledged enquiry. No charge was given before terminating his services and he was not given any time to produce the evidence. In show cause notice , the time and place and the person with whom he misbehaved has not beengiven. His services were terminated on no evidence . Punishing authority did not resort to procedural power in a judicial spirit and terminated his services illegally, unjustifiably and arbitrarily.

Ithasbeen further submitted that the workman gave reply to the show - cause notice but his reply was not considered. He filed an appeal . No response has been receivedby the DLC, Meerut . The Government of U.P. did not find himself into the matter appropriate Govt . , so this industrial dispute was raised.

Themanagement has filed written statement.

It has been stated by the management in the written statement that the employer is not an industry. The canteen functioning under the Army Headquarters " Q " Branch , Master General . It is an extension of Canteen Stores Department with its Head Office at Bombay. It is a Department ofMinistry of Defence, Government of India and its financial transactions are within the purview of the consolidated funds of India, Government of India . The workman was registered with the Canteen Stores Department, Bombay and has been allotted regn. No. 2309 being an agency of the Defence Forces Department, the retail outlets from the Canteen Stores Department, Meerut Cantt. is in the hands of individual Comanding officers ofthe units/formations in the army. Its profits are used for the troops at the unit level . The household goods of the canteen are purely for defence-personnel both in service orretired and not for public at large . So it is not an industrial dispute.

It has been further submitted that the reference is void and illegal and is not maintainable in this Hon'ble Tribunal . The preliminary matter relates to the jurisidiction ofthe Tribunal so it will be decided first .

It has been further submitted that the workman applicant was a counter attendant in the establishment of the employer. That the work performance ofthe workman and his conduct started deteriorating very fast since the year 1987. The establishment of the employer being an establishment for the welfare ofthe defence personnel , all its employees are duty bound to be helpful , courteous and respectful to the customers. The customers are ex- servicemen and old persons so they should be treated amicably.

It hasbeen further submitted that the workman while on duty misbehaved with the retired defence officer and 1412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

wasdisrespectful to him . When Shri Satish Chand Sharma advised him not to disrespect the retired defence officers , the workman used abusive language against him and insulted him . Shri Satish Chand Sharma recommended disciplinary action and requested his transfer . The workman was summoned by the management of the canteen and was admonished to be careful in future. That on 17.7.1987, the workman was asked to bring liquor filled bottles from the bulk store but he deliberately left the handle ofthe cart causing breakage number of liquor filled bottles. He was found issuing wrong goods to the customers and it was rectified by his associates and seniors.

It has been further submitted that on 10.03.1989, the workman issued two bottles of rum to a customer to whom the same was not to be issued . The error was detected and due to the error of the workman, the incharge of the canteen has to deposit the cost of these two bottles . He was asked several times to improve his behaviour but to no affect.

On28-05-1989, a complaint was received against him. Heassaulted that person as a result ofwhich he (customer) fell down and suffered humiliation. Later the workman apologized . Several warnings were given to him but there was no change in his behaviour.

That on 17-07-1990 again, the workman assaulted a customer and when he was checked by his superior, he spoke to him in disrespectful manner.

That on 24-08-1990 , the workman misbehaved with Mrs. Seema Tyagi , wife ofFlt . Lft. Rajiv Tyagi and insulted her. Considering the entire facts and the past record ofhis misbehaviour, his services were terminated. He is not entitled to any relief. All the pleadings of his statement of claim are denied.

The workman has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder, he has stated that the preliminary objections are wrong. The allegations levelled against him are false . He never misbehaved with any person. All the paras of written statement are denied.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers annexed with the record. The counsel for the workman argued that the canteen is not a creation of Statute Act or legislation. The Ministry of Defence and Master General had nothing to do with the çanteen and his employees so this court has jurisdiction. Earlier the matter was referred to State Tribunal but it was held that the Central-Government is the appropriate authority. In this respect, he cited 81/1999, Delhi Law Times 395, 1998 (S) SLR Page 684, 1988 (S) SLR Page 687. In all the citations, it has been held that the canteen is not a government body. It is a Public Undertaking and hence the court has jurisdiction to decide this case . In 2000 LLR page 781 and 2000 LLR - 1014 , in 2000 LLR page 1044, it has been held that the enquiry Officer should have recorded the evidence

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] with an opportunity to the petitioner to defend the charges . In1999, FLR page 601 , it has been held that if the workman is not in gainful employment , back wages cannot be withheld. In 1999 (82) FLR 866, it has been held that charge sheet should have been given and enquiry should have been made , if serious charges of mis - conduct are found against the workman. In 1999 ( 81 ) FLR 687 , it has been held that an enquiry should be conducted and the charges should be proved otherwise a stigma would be attached even to a probationer in this case . The workman is a permanent employee . In 2000 SCC - Page-613, it has been held that an enquiry is necessary to prove the misconduct alleged against an employee . In the instant case , no enquiry has been held . The services of the workman has been terminated on giving show - cause notice and getting reply from him . There are complaints of several persons but theyhave not been examined and no cross examination ofthe complainants has been made by the workman. The workman was removed only on the allegations and complaints . The services of the workman have been terminated. In 1975 FLR, page 194, it has been held that if evidence has not been adduced and without having any cross-examination of the witnesses, the services of the workman has been terminated such termination is illegal.

The learned counsel for the management has argued that several complaints were made against the workman and show-cause notice was issued to him . Several warnings were issued to him but he did not improve his conduct. His misbehaviour continued so he was terminated. Shri Satish Sharmahas been examined from the side ofthe management and Satya Prakash has been examined from the side of the workman. But other witnesses who have made complaints have not been examined . No fullfledged enquiry has been held. Onlyby producing Shri Satish Sharma, the misconduct ofthe workman is not established. The management ought tohave held any enquiry. If no enquiry was held atleast all thewitnesses who made complaints against the workman mustbe examined but it has not been done so. Though there is written complaint of those witnesses but those witnesses have not come in the Court to prove their complaints. In such circumstances , the termination of services of the workman is not on the basis of any enquiry andhence it cannot be said tobe legal and justified . Neither the enquiry has been held nor all the witnesses have been produced in the Court. So far as the back wages are concerned, the workman under the facts and circumstances ofthe case is not entitled to full back wages. The case is pending since 1994 and several dates have been taken by the workman himself, as such 20 % back wages in the facts and circumstances of this case would be sufficient .

Thepoint referred to above is replied thus :-

That the action of the management of Canteen Stores Deptt. , interminating the services of Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, son ofShri Raghuwar Dayal Sharma, ex-salesman w.e.f. 30.01.1991 is neither legal nor justified. He is entitled 1413 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

beingwages@Rs. 50/-per day although, he continuslyworked forthe whole month but he was paid for 10 days only.

tobe reinstatedfrom 30th of January, 1991 with 20% back wages and due increments .

Dated:-23-02-2004

R. N. RAI, PresidingOfficer

That the officers of the Doordarshan Kendra have beenplaying a fraud with a workmanby paying him only 10days wages when actually he was working continuously andregularlyfrom 1st September, 1988upto date.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

That no-regularisation of services of the workmar. aforsaid in proper pay scale and allowances is wholly illegal, bad, unjust and malafide for the following amongst other reasons :-

का. आ. 764.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरदर्शन केन्द्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 32/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

That after continuously working in each month and showing the workman to have worked only for 10 days andplayinghimwages for 10 days amounts to unfair labour practice.

That thejob against which the workman aforesaid was working is of a regular and permanent nature ofjob which is still continuing with the managment.

[सं. एल-42012/78/90- आई.आर. (डी.यू.) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 3rd March, 2004

That employing persons on regular nature ofjobs and treating them as muster roll workers for indefinite period and paying them lesser remuneration than those who are doingthe identical work and the work of the same value amounts to unfair labour practice as provided in Section2(ra) read with item No. 10 of the 5th schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

S. O. 764. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 32/92) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of Doordarshan Kendra and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on3-3-2004.

That it amounts to unfair labour practice and sheer exploitation of labour.

[No. L-42012/78/90- IR(DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-

That the pronounced by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi a workman is deemed to have been regularised in services after completing 240 days continuous services in a span of a 12 calendar months according to which the workman aforesaid has acquired the status of a permanent employee.

LABOUR COURT - IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI L.D. No. 32/92

SURAJ PAL SHARMA

VERSUS

DOORDARSHAN KENDRA

AWARD

That a demand notice was served upon the Director of the Doordarshan Kendra by Regd . A/D post vide communication dated 3rd August, 1989 duly received in his officebut no reply was received and it was presumed that the demand was rejected . Threreafter, the dispute was raised by a filling a statement of claim before the conciliation officer , Delhi Administration, Delhi on 22-11-1989 in which the regularisation of services ofthe workman Sh. Suraj Pal Sharma was demanded.

The Ministry of Labour vide its letter dt. 08-05-1992 has referred the following point forAward.

That after receiving the demand notice on 2nd September, 1989 the management has terminated the service ofthe workman Sh . Suraj Pal Sharma w.e.f. 11-09-1989.

That the termination of services of the workman Sh. Suraj Pal Sharma is wholly illegal bad, unjust and malafide for the following amongst other reasons :-

"Whether the action of the managment of Doordarshan Kendra, New Delhi in terminating the services ofShri Suraj Pal Sharma ofw.e.f. 11-09-1989 is justified ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?"

That the workman aforesaid has been victimized for raising an industrial dispute for regularisation of his services and for that reason the management has terminated the services of the workman aforesaid by the victimization .

In this claim the climant has stated that the workman Shri Suraj Pal Sharma joined into the employment of Doordarshan Kendra w.e.f. 1st September, 1988. as General Asstt.. He was being treated as muster roll worker and was 1414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

monetary. The cost of litigation as provided in Section 11 (7) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 be also allowed.

That the services of the workman have been terminated during the pendency of an industrial dispute in clear violation of section 33 of Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 without obtaining any permission from the conciliation officers before whom the dispute was pending.

Any other relief, direction or order as may deem fit to this Hon'ble court may also be given in favour of the workman,

That at the time of termination of services, no seniority list displayed, no notice was served, no notice pay was either offered or paid and no service compensation was either offered or paid to the workman aforesaid.

Inhis written statement the opposite party has stated that the statement of claim is not maintainable as the workmanfailed to file the same with the Tribunal within 15 daysof receipt of the order of reference and also failedto forward a copy of such statement to the managment involved in the dispute as required under rule 10-b ofthe industrial disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

That the workman aforesaid had required the status ofa permanent employee after rendering services from Ist September , 1988 to 11th September , 1989. He has unblemished and uninterrupted record of service to his credit.

That there is no retrenchment and the present case falls under exception (bb) of clause ( oo) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and thus the statement ofclaim is not maintainable.

That the workman aforesaid has been meted out with hostile discrimination as juniors to him have been retained in services , thay have also been regularised in services , but the workman aforesaid has been thrown out ofjob.

That during the period from 01-09-1988 to 11-09-1989 he has been treated as muster roll worker . He was being paid his wages as fixed and revised from time to time under the minimum wages Act i.e. @ Rs. 50/- per day but he was paid only for 10 days in a month although he had to work throughout the month.

That the statement of claim is bad for non -joinder of necessary parties. Any decision on the application made by the workman is likely to affect adversely the rights of the alleged junior employees and so the very basis and essential requirement that a person who is going to be adversely affected should be made a party to the proceeding and should alleged juniors being made parties to the proceeding, the statement of claim made by the worker is not maintainable .

That even otherwise, the impugned termination of services is violative of Section 25 F, G & H of the Industrial Diputes Act, 1947 read with rules 76, 77 and 78 of the industrial disputes ( Central) Rules , 1957.

That at the time of termination of services of the workman aforesaid , he was working against permanent and regular nature ofjob .

That the workman is not entitled to back wages as the judicial pronouncement is in the nature of a fresh rule elaborated by a court in the interest ofjustice and it can have effect only from the date of pronouncement. It is submitted that in other words it would mean that its effect willbe onlyprospective and the retrospective like any other new rule of law emanating from the Parliament or the Executive.

That no notice was served on the appropriate Govt . for effecting the retrenchment of the workman aforesaid.

That the workman aforesaid is unemployed since 12th September , 1989.

Thatthe workman was engaged by the Doordarshan Kendra , New Delhi as artist on asignment basis as general Asstt. On 10 (TEN) days basis w.e.f. 21.09.88 to 30.09.88 and not from 01.09.88 .

REPLY ON MERITS:

That para 1 of the statement of claim is a record .

That a demand notice was served upon the Director of the Doordarshan Kendra by Regd. A/D post vide communication on 5th October, 1989 duly received in his office on 7th October, 1989 but no reply was received and it was presumed that the demand has been rejected. Thercafter, the dispute was raised by filling a statement of claim before the conciliation officer . The conciliation proceedings were initiated but resulted in failure bcause of the adamant and non- cooperative attitude of the management .

That para 2 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied. It is submitted that the workman was engaged by Doordarshan Kendra, New Delhi as Artist on assignment basis as General Asstt . On 10 days basis w.e.f. 21-09-88 to 30-09-88 and from 01-09-88 as alleged. Before engagement as assignment basis a contract for 10 days assingment has been signed by him. He did not work for the whole month . It isdenied that he was being treated as muster roll worker .

It is, therefore , prayed that an award be given in favour of the workman holding thereby the termination of services of Sh . Suraj Pal Sharma by the management is illegal and unjustified and holding him entitled to reinstatement in services with continuity and full back wages in proper pay scale and allowances and with all consequential benefits thereof either monetary or non-

That para 3 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied. The workman has not worked for the whole month in Sept. 1988, but he worked for 10 days from 21-09-88 to 30-09-88 for which he has signed contract accordingly. As such no fraud has been played with him.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1415 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

That para 5 of the statement of claim is a matter of record.

That para 6 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied . The workman has left ofhis own.

That para 4 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied. The question of regularisation in proper scale and allowances ..... , etc ..... , does not arise at all..... , as he was engaged for a particular type of job for which before taking assignment he has signed the contract . It was open to him to sign the contract or to refuse to sign the contract . The sub-paras are replied as under :-

That in reply to para 7 of the statement of claim it is submitted that the workman left of his own and was not available for further contracts . The sub -paras are replied asunder:-

Sub-paras ( i ) ( ii ) & (iii ) are denied as the workman left ofhis own .

Sub -para 4 ( i ) is wrong and denied. The workman was engaged for 10 days only in a month and has been paid for 10 days as per the terms of the contract signed by him. The question of unfair labour practice does not arise at all in this case.

Inreply to sub-para ( iv) it is submitted that workman was engaged on assignment basis for 10 days in a month from 21-09-1988 as per details given in para No.4 (v) above .

Sub-para (v) is wrong and denied.

Sub -para ( ii ) is absolutely incorrect . To meet urgent programme exigencies Doordarshan Kendra engages Art- ists on assignment basis . Their engagement depends on the prgramme requirement. It is denied that the job against which the workman was engaged is of a regular or perma- nent nature .

The workman was engaged on assingment basis for 10days in a month for which before taking assingment he has signed the contract . Details of his engagement are mentioned in para (v) above .

No order of termination was issued as the workman left of his own. It is denied that he was working against permanent and regular nature ofjob . There is no violation of any sections or rules of the Industrial Disputes Act .

Since the workman was engaged on assignment basis for a specified period, he signed the contract accord- ingly question of issue of notice of termination does not arise. Moreover the workman left the job ofhis own .

Sub - para ( iii ) ( iv) are absolutely incorrect the Doordarshan Kendra engages the Artist on assignment basis . The fee for such Artist varies from Rs.50/- to 400/- per assignment . Their engagement depends on the programme requirements. As per the scheme approvedby the Govt . a person can be engaged as Artist on assign- ment basis maximum for a period of 10 days in a month. A penal of persons is prepared for this purpose and they are booked on rotation basis depending on the programme requirements . The question of unfair labour practice and exploitation does not arise at all .

That para 8 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied.

That para 9 of the statement of claim is a matter of record.

In view of the submissions made above the applica- tion/statement of claim of the workman may be dismissed with costs.

Sub - para (v ) is absolutely incorrect. The pronounce- ment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi is not applicable in the present case . The workman has not been employ- ment for twelve calendar months and has actually worked for less than 240 days during the said twelve calendar months . Thus both the conditions have not been fulfilled. Details of his booking as Artist on assignment basis is

given below:---

Period

No. of Days

1. 21-9-88 to 30-9-88

2. 1-10-88 to 10-11 )-88

3. 21-11-88 10 30-11-88

4. 21-12-88 to 30-12-88

The claimant has filed re -joinder. In his re-joinder he has refutiated the allegation of WS and he has submitted that all the allegation of WS are false . He has worked for 1 year he has received payment for 10 days every month . The WS should be rejected and he should be reinstated with full back wages .

5. 22-1-89 to 31-1-89

Heard arguments from both the parties and perused documents on the record .

6. 19-2-89 to 28-2-89

10Days in each

7. 22-3-89 to 31-3-89 Period.

8. 21-4-89 to 30-4-89

9. 22-5-89 to 31-5-89

10. 21-6-89 to 30-6-89

11. 22-7-89 to 31-7-89

12. 21-8-89 to 30-8-89

13. 1-9-89 to 10-9-89

TOTAL: 130 days

It has been argued by the learned counsel of the workman that the workman right from 01-09-1988 to 10-09-1999 daily went to Doordarshan Kendra and per- formed his duties . He has annexed gate passed for the aforesaid periods . The management has not admitted the paper filed by him . However the management itself as filed 10 papers and in these papers it has been written " Artist on assingment basis to work as general Asstt . " . It implies that the workman worked as General Asstt . at least for 120 days accordingly to the papers filed by the management 1416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

itself. It was further submitted that the workman has com- pleted 120 days work and these papers also go along to prove that he was appointed at the post ofGeneral Asstt . for 120 days . On 09-06-1992 for absorption for casual Artist at various Doordarshan Kendra . It has been stated that the casual Artist in Doordarshan should be regularised even if they have worked on assingment basis as casual Artist for 120 days . It was further argued that in view of the circular letter ofthe management for regularisation of casual Artist in Doordarshan the workman is entitled to be regularised as he has worked for 120 days .

Itwas argued from the side of the management that the workman did not apply according to the scheme for regularisation so he could not be regularised. In view of the circular letter ofthe management the workman, deserves tobe reinstatedat least from 09-06-1992, the daywhen the circular letter was issue .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 1-3-2004.

[No. L- 12012/43/2002- IR(B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL- TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Thursday, the 22nd January, 2004

PRESENT:

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 56/2002

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of Sub -section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , betweentheManagement of State Bank of India and their workmen]

BETWEEN :

Sri K. Mohan

Itwas submitted on behalf of the management that theworkman is an Artist . An Artist never sits idol he does some work of Art . The workman naturally would be work- ing these days so he should not get more than 25% of the back wages . In view of the above discussion I am of the conformed opinion that the workman deserves to be reinstated from 09-06-1992 the day when the circular was issued.

As such the question referred to for adjudication is replied thus.

'The action of the management Doordarshan Kendra New Delhi in terminating the services of Sh. Suraj Pal Sharma w.e.f. 09-06-1992 is not justify he deserves to be reinstated from 09-06-1992 with 25% wages . The Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 23-02-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 765.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. 56/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/43/2002- आई.आर. ( बी- I ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 765. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (ID . No. 56/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai , now as shown in the Annexure in the

: I Party/Workman

AND

The ChiefGeneral Manager, II Party/Management State Bank of India,

LocalHead Office, Chennai .

APPEARANCE :

Forthe Workman : M/s. Aiyar & Dolia , R. Arumugam & N. Krishan- kumar, Advocates

FortheManagement : M/s.S . Kanniah & P. Kolappa Pillai Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 12012/ 43/ 2002 - IR(B -I ) dated 27-06-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the action ofthe management of State Bank of India in dismissing the services of Sri K. Mohan is justified ? If not what relief is he entitled?"

1 2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I. D. No. 56/2002 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The contention of the Petitioner in the Claim State- ment is briefly as follows :---

The Petitioner was appointed as a clerk in the ser- vices of the Respondent/Bank at West Mambalam branch on 7-8-75 and he was subsequently transferred to T. Nagar 1417 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4. As against this , the Respondent/Bank in its

Counter Statement alleged that it is no doubt true that the Petitioner has entered into the services of Respondent/ Bank as a Clerk in the year 1975 and while he was working as a clerk in T. Nagar branch he has committed serious misconducts and therefore , disciplinary action was initiated against him and he was placed under suspension followed by show cause notice for the various irregulari- ties committedby him. Since the explanation given by the Petitioner was not satisfactory, the bank has decided to conduct domestic enquiry which proved the various charges framed against him. After the Enquiry Officer's report the Disciplinary Authority who has not satisfied with the findings of the Enquiry Officer in respect of fifth charge has issued a second show cause notice in which he hasmentioned that he is not agreeable with the findings of the Enquiry Officer with regard to fifth charge . Thus , after affording sufficient opportunity to the Petitioner to prove his innocence has taken a lenient view by imposing the punishment of discharge through his order dated 5-2-99. TheAppellant Authority also after applying his mind has rightly rejected the appeal preferred by the Petitioner. The order passed by the Assistant General Manager Region II , who is the competent authority, is valid and it cannot be questioned by the Petitioner. The enquiry was conducted inajust and proper manner and the Enquiry Officer has givena sufficient opportunity to the Petitioner to prove his innocence in the enquiry conducted by him. The Petitioner has taken part in the enquiry along with his representative and witness were also cross examined by the representative and copies of all documents were given to the Petitioner. Under such circumstances, it cannot be contended that the enquiry was not conducted in a fair and proper way. The Petitioner was responsible for prера- ration of withdrawal slip /letters and obtained payment from the Cashier and later destroyed all the evidences to get over the guilt . As per the disciplinary structure appli- cable at the relevant time, Assistant General Manager Region II was the competent authority for initiating disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner. During the course of enquiry, the Petitioner did not raise any objections about the manner in which the same was pro- ceeded with. It is false to allege that admission letter given by the Petitioner was obtained by using pressure tactics adopted by the officials , who came to his house for inves- tigation and it is an afterthought made by the Petitioner. Under such circumstances , the Respondent prays that the claimmay be dismissed with costs .

5. In these ciscumstances , the points for my determination are

(i) "Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in dismissing the services of the Petitioner is justified ? "

(ii) "To what relief. the Petitioner is entitled ? " branch during 1984. He had thus put up 23 years of con- tinuous service. While so , the Assistant General Manager Region II , who is not the competent authority to take disci- plinary action against the Petitioner by an order dated 15-10-94 placed him under suspension. Then by charge sheet dated 14-12-1994 he framed five charges against the Petitoner alleging acts of forging and destructing the bank's records and misappropriated the bank's money. The Petitioner's explanation was not considered and the enquiry was ordered. The Enquiry Officer , after the enquiry has submitted his report stating that four charges were not proved and the fifth charge has been partly proved. But , the Enquiry Officer without giving any reason, has come to the conclusion that the charge is partly proved. Further, he did not specify which part or portion of the charge was proved. While so, the Assistant General Manager Region II has sent a letter on 8-12-1998 inwhich he has stated that so far as charges 1 to 4, he has concurred with the findings of the Enquiry Officer, but disagreed with the findings in respect of charge No. 5 and he also proposed the punishment of discharge and after calling for personal hearing , he has imposed the punish- ment of discharge and also treated the period of suspen- sion as one of suspension for all the purposes . But, when the Assistant General Manager Region II did not concur with the findings of Enquiry Officer, before proposing the punishment, has not issued any notice to him that he disagree with the punishment on what grounds and for which reasons and did not call upon him to submit his explanation on that matter . Therefore , Assistant General ManagerRegion II , who is not competent authority, passed the order of discharge which is illegal . Even the appeal preferred against that order to Appellate Authority was also dismissed by him on 11-5-99. The Enquiry Officer and also the Disciplinary Authority have not followed the pro- cedure as contemplated under various decisions of Apex Court and High Coutrs . The Deputy General Manager, Zonal Office , Chennai has no authority to hear the Peti- tioner in terms of Bipartite Settlement . Thus , the charge sheet issued and order of discharge of the Petitioner from service were not under proper authority, thus making his termination a wrongful one . The Disciplinary Authority while confirming the punishment has not considered the Petitioner's 23 years of past record of service , which is unblemished . The Appellate Authority with a biased nature had come to the conclusion and rejected the appeal . The punishment awarded to the Petitioner is not only harsh butalso awarded for the acts , which were not proved and established. The Petitioner is at the age of 53 years and was kept under suspention for more than four years and this suspension period was also treated as suspension for all purposes and hence , double punishment was imposed on him. Therefore , this Tribunal has got ample powers under Section 11A to interfere with the order of discharge and to set aside the same . For all these reasons , the Peti- tioner prays that an award niay be passed in his favour .

826 G1/04-19 1418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)] Point No. 1 :-

10. Again, the fifth charge framed against the Peti- tioner is that the Petitioner forged the signature of an ac- count holder Smt. Rajalakshmi in S.B. Account No. C/8261 on 3-10-94 and made out banker's cheque for the same account in favour of Sri M. Kumar and misappropriated the said amount . Further, he destructed the letter purported to have been prepared by him and also the entire bunch of vouchers relating to current account No. C/ 8261 on 3-10-94, in which the Enquiry Officer has held that charge No.5 is partyproved.

6. In this case, the Petitiner, who was working as a clerk in the Respondent/Bank at the T. Nagar branch, was charged for various irregularities alleged tohave been com- mitted by him in which five charges have been framed against him for which an Enquiry Officer was appointed and he has given a finding that out of the five charges , first four charges have not been proved against the Petitioner and in the fifth charge, the same has been partly proved against the Petitioner. But the Disciplinary Authority has not agreed with the findings of the Enquiry Officer has held that the fifth charge has been proved against the Petitioner and he has proposed the punishment of dis- charge from service . The Petitioner's appeal before the Appellant Authority has also been rejected by the Appel- lateAuthority.

7. As against this, the Petitioner contended that the Assistant General Manager Region II is not the competent authority to pass an order of proposed punishment of dis- charge and according to the circular issued by the General Manager on 28-11-94 , the Assistant General Manager incharge of Scale V branches in the circle as Disciplinary Authority under the provisions of Bipartite Settlement and in terms of the decision of the Executive Committee of the Central Board dated 16-7-94 and it is further stated that the Appellate Authority for such branch will be the Assistant General Managers or Deputy General Managers at the Zonal Office functioning as controlling for the branch.con- cerned . The Petitioner in this case contended that the Assistant General Manager T. Nagar branch was verywell available but the notice and also second show cause notice were issued by Assistant General Manager Region II Zonal Office as Disciplinary Authority and therefore , he is not the competent person for issuing such notice and also to take disciplinary action against the Petitioner .

8. But, on behalf of the Respondent, it is contended that this circular event though issued on 28-11-94 it will apply only to future cases with effect from 1-12-94 . But in this case, action against the Petitioner was taken even prior to that date and at that time Assistant General Manager Region II was the competent authority to take disciplinary action against the Petitioner and therefore , the Petitioner cannot question the authority of the disciplinary officer.

9. But , I find there is no point in this contention of the Respondent because , even though the action was taken for the misdeed prior to 1-12-1994 , the charge sheet was issúed only on 14-12-1994 , which is subsequent to 1-12-94 and therefore, according to the circular Ex. W1 , the compe- tent authority to take disciplinary action against the Petitioner is Assistant General Manager, Incharge of Scale V branches . In this case , the Assistant General Manager, T. Nagar branch is the competent authority but he has not taken any action and only Deputy General Manager , Zonal Office has taken action against the Petitioner, which is not proper in this case.

11. On behalf ofthe Petitioner, it is contended that theEnquiryOfficer without giving any reason has come to the conclusion that the charge is partly proved and further he did not specify which part or which portion is partly proved . In the body of the findings, he has given a ruling that charges have not been proved but in the last para, he has incorrectly stated that charge No. 5 is partly proved. Further, it is his report that " it has also but not been con- clusively proved that vouchers and letters were destroyed bythe Petitioner" . Under such circumstances, the Enquiry Officerhas erred in giving the finding that charge No. 5 has beenpartly proved. It is also contended that the Disciplin- aryAuthority who has not concurred with the findings of the Enquiry Officer in respect of charge No. 5 and while coming to the conclusion that the Petitioner is guilty of charge No. 5 in so far as destruction of bank record is concerned, he has to give an opportunity to the Petitioner before imposingthe proposed punishment. It is well settled by the Apex Court and High Courts that in such circum- stances , if the Disciplinary Authority has come to a con- clusion that the charge has been proved, while the Enquiry Officer has held that it was not proved, he must give an opportunity to Petitioner nor the victim concerned. For this, the learned counsel for the Petitioner relied on the ruling reported in 1998 II LLJ 809 SC PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS . VS. KUNJ BEHARI MISRA AND AN- OTHER wherein the Supreme Court held that "when the enquiry is conducted by the Enquiry Officer his report is notfinal or conclusive and the disciplinary proceedings do not stand concluded. Thedisciplinary proceedings stand concluded with decision of the Disciplinary Au- thority. It is the Disciplinary Authority which can impose thepenalty andnot the Enquiry Officer. Where the Disci- plinary Authority itself holds an enquiry an opportunity ofhearing has to be granted by him . When the Disciplin- aryAuthority differs with the view ofEnquiry Officer and proposes to come to a different conclusion, there is no reason as to why an opportunity ofhearing should not be granted. It will be most unfair and iniquitous that where the charged officers succeed before the Enqiry Officer, they were deprived of representing to the Disciplinary Authority before that authority differs with Enquiry Officer's report and while recording finding ofguilt. im- posespunishment on the officer...... Asa result thereof whenever the Disciplinary Authority disagrees with Enquiry Officer on any article of charge then , before it 1419 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

imposing the punishment the Disciplinary Authority has givenan opportunity to the Petitioner.

15. Then, the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that theDisciplinary Authority whiling confirming thepunishment has not considered the Petitioner's 23 years ofpast record of service which is unblemished and therefore, the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority is not according to the Bipartite Settlement and also Sastry Award.

16. Here again, I find some force in this contention because theDisciplinary Authority in his finding has not given any reason for imposing such a harsh and fatal punishment. Further he has not considered the past records ofthe Petitioner. Therefore, in view of my finding that the Disciplinary Authority in this case is not the competent authority to impose the punishment and also in view of my finding that principles of natural justice has not been followed. I find this point in favour of the Petitioner.

Point No. 2 :-

records its ownfindings on such charge, it must record its tentative reasons for such disagreement and give the delinquent employee an opportunity to represent before it records its findings. The principles of natural justice require the authority which has to take a final decision and can impose a penalty to give an opportunity to the officer charged with misconduct tofile a representation before the Disciplinary Authority records its findings on chargesframed against the officer. ". The learned counsel for the Petitioner further argued that before the Disciplin- ary Authority in this case given a finding with regard to Enquiry Officer's report, he has to give an explanation and he has to give reasons for his disagreement with the Enquiry Officer's report. But, in this case, the alleged Dis- ciplinary Authority namely Assistant General Manager Region II , Zonal Office has not given any reason for his disagreement with the Enquiry Officer's report, not given any opportunity to the Petitioner to give his representa- tion. Under such circumstances , the Disciplinary Authority's action is illegal and it is against the principles ofnaturaljustice.

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the Petitioner Sri K. Mohan is to be reinstated in service with continuityofservice , back wages and also other attendant benefits. Ordered accordingly. No. Costs .

18. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 22nd January, 2004.)

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer 12. As against this, the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that even though the Disciplinary Authority has not given an opportunity for the Petitioner before he has given a findings before issuing the show cause notice, he has expressed his opinion that he is dis- agreedwith the findings of the Enquiry Officer with regard to charge No. 5 and he has given the proposed punish- ment and also given an opportunity for personal hearing and only after the personal hearing, he has imposed the punishment . In such circumstances , it cannot be said that the interest ofthe Petitioner has been prejudiced and there- fore, it cannot be said that principles ofnatural justice had not been followed.

Witnesses Examined:-

: None

Oneither side

DocumentsMarked:-

Ex. No. Date Description

W1 28-11-94

Xerox copy of the circular issued by Respondent/Bank.

13. Again the learned counsel for the Petitioner has relied on the ruling reported in 2003 SCC L & S 185 STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. K.P. NARAYANAN KUTTY , wherein the Supreme Court has held that "we find it diffi-. cult to accept the contention advanced on behalf of the appellants that unless it is shown that some prejudice was caused to the Respondent, the order ofdismissal could be set aside by the Court. "

W2 08-12-98 Xerox copy of the letter from Disciplinary Authority to Petitioner

W3 22-01-99 Хегox copy of the letter from Petitioner to Disciplinary Authority

For the II Party/Management:-

Ex. No. Date Description

M

03-10-94

Xerox copy of the statement of accounts

M2 08-10-94 Хегox copy of the complaint of customer

14. Therefore, I find there is no substance in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the II Party/Manage- ment because on reading the Enquiry Officer's report with charge to charge No. 5 , he has not clearly stated which portion of charge No. 5 was partly proved against the Petitioner. Inboth the parts , he has come to the conclusion that the Respondent/Management has not proved the charge levelled against the Petitioner and only in the last line, he has stated that the fifth charge has been partly proved. As against this , the Disciplinary Authority who has come to a different conclusion has not given an oppor- tunity to the Petitioner to say his representation. Under such circustances , I find it is futile to contend that before 1420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

Ex. No. Date Description

M3 10-10-94 Xerox copy of the letter of Petitioner M4 31-10-94 Xerox copy of the letter of Petitioner's father.

MS 15-10-94 Xerox copy of the suspension order.

M6 14-12-94 Xerox copy of the show cause notice M7 Nil

Xerox copy of the letter and findings ofEnquiryOfficer.

M8 05-02-99 Xerox copy of the order of Disciplinary Authroity

M9 26-03-99 Xerox copy of the appeal filed by Petitioner

M10 06-04-99 Xerox copy of the letter of Appellate Authority

M11 11-05-99 Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority

M12 13-12-96 Xerox copy of the letter from Vigilance department of Respondent/ Bank to Kalpakkam branch.

M13

04-12-96

25-04-95 to Xerox copy of the enquiry proceed- ings .

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का ० आ ० 766.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II . धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 120/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं० एल -20012/226/97- आई ० आर० ( सी-1 ) ]

एस० एस० गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2004

S. O. 766. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 120/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- 11. Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on . 27-2-2004 .

[No. L -200 12/226/97 -IR(C - 1 ) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ]

PRESENT

SHRI B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer.

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 120 of 1998

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Open CastProject of M/s . BCCL and theirworkman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workmen : None .

Onbehalf ofthe Employers : Mr. H. Nath,

Adovcate

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 12th February , 2004 AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 226/97 - I.R. (C- I) , dated the 30th April , 1998.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra OCP ofM/s . B.C.C.L. in not taking any action on the request ofthe workman Smt . Kapura Bhuini , Loading Kamin for employment of her son Shri Hari Charan Bhuia is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to written statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on hisbehalf in brief is as follows :-.

The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was in employment under the management at BhowraOpen Cast Project for a long period. They submitted that before six years of her superannuation from service she submitted application under V.R. Scheme for employment ofher son but the management did not consider her prayer arbitrarily. Thereafter in the year 1995 she again applied for acceptance of her resignation with a prayer for employment of her son under the same scheme but in that occasion too the management illegally and arbitrarily did not consider her prayer and for which her son was deprived of getting his employment. They submitted that as the management refused to consider her prayer she raised an industrial dispute before the ALC ( C ) , Dhanbad for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication .

The sponsoring union accordingly submitted prayer on behalf ofthe concerned workman to pass award directing the management to provide employment of her son.

1421

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

demand for acceptance of resignation and also to provide employment to their dependent . They submitted that it was the discretionary power of the management whether resignation submitted by any female worker will be accepted or not . They disclosed that as they did not accept resignation of the concerned workman under V.R. Scheme itdid not meanthat the said decision was illegal and arbitrary. They admitted that the concerned workman in the year 1995 again tendered resignation under V.R. Scheme with a view to get employment ofher son. It has been submitted by the management that the said resignation of the concerned workman also could not be considered as she by that time crossed 50 years of her age They disclosed that under the said scheme a female worker was allowed to tender resignation if she was below 50 years of age.

They submitted that the concerned workman was engaged at Bhowra O.C.P. as wagon loader. In the year 1993 she applied for accepting her resignation under V.R. Scheme but as her such prayer was not considered she continued toher work in the same capacity. They submitted that it was not obligatory on their part to accept resignation of a female worker under V.R. Scheme and to provide employment to her dependant. Management admitted that in the year 1995 again the concerned workman submitted application for acceptance of her resignation providing employment to her dependant son under the same scheme but as at that time the concerned workman crossed her age of 50 years as per the terms of the scheme she was not eligible to tender her resignation. They categorically denied the fact that they committed any illegality or took any arbitrary decision in accepting the resignation of the concerned workman . Accordingly they submitted their prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the sponsoring Union for providing employment to the deperidant son of the concerned workman.

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

It is the specific claim of the management that under the said scheme there was clear provision by which they reserved the right exclusively either to accept or to reject any suchapplication of the female worker. The sponsoring Union in their written statement did not make any whisper about said assertion. It is true that management did not accept the resignation of the concerned workman , They have clearly pointed out that it was not obligatory on their part to accept all such resignation and to provide employment to their dependents . Therefore, onus shifted on the concerned workman to establish that the management illegally and arbitrarily rejected her claim.

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra OCP ofM/s . B.C.C.L. in not taking any action on the request of the workman Smt . Kapura Bhuini , Loading Kamin for employment of her son Shri Hari Charan Bhuini is justified ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

5. FINDINGS WITH REASONS

It appears from the record that in course of hearing neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared though sufficient opportunities were given to them. In the circumstances the management also declined to adduce any evidence .

Record shows clearly that in spite of getting ample opportunities the sponsoring Union did not consider necessary to establish such allegation which they have made against the management . It is cardinal principle of law that facts disclosed in the pleadings cannot be considered as substantive piece of evidence until and unless the same is substantiated by cogent oral or documentary evidence. Accordingly, just relying on the facts disclosed in the written statement there is no scope to arrive into any such conclusion that decision of the management not to accept the resignation tendered by the concernedworkman was illegal and arbitrary.

Inview of the facts and circumstances discussed above I have no dispute to hold that the concerned workmanhas failed tojustify her claim and for which she is not entitled to get any relief in view of her prayer.

Inthe result, the following award is rendered :-

"The action of the management of Bhowra OCP of M/s. B.C.C.L. in not taking any action on the request ofthe workman Smt . Kapura Bhuini , Loading Kamin for employment of her son Shri Hari Charan Bhuini isjustified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief? "

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides I find no dispute to hold that the concerned workman was a wagon loader at Bhowra O.C.P. It is also admitted fact that in the year 1993 concerned workman submitted his prayer to accept her resignation and to provide employment to her dependent son under V.R. Scheme for the female workers launched by the management . It is also admitted fact that such prayer of the concerned workman was rejected. It is the contention of the sponsoring Union that the management illegally and arbitrarily did not consider prayer of the concerned workman . On the contrary management submitted that introduction of V.R. Scheme amongst the female workers Ipso-facto did not confer any right to the workman to place 1422

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7 , 1926

नईदिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

from service is justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

का. आ. 767. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 335/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/372/ 99 - आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 3rd March, 2004

2. To-day was the date fixed for adducing evidence on behalf of the workman . But neither the concerned workman nor his representative is found present. None also appears on behalf of the management . This is a case of 1999. It is seen that in spite of giving sufficient opportunity the parties have failed to take appropriate steps with aview to take up hearing of this case . There is sufficient reason to believe that the parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case . As such, at this stage I do not find any sufficient ground to adjourn the case suo -motu .

Accordingly, I render a ' No Dispute ' Award in this casepresuming non -existence of any dispute between the parties.

B. BISWAS; Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

S. O. 767. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 335/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004.

[No. L- 20012/372/99 - IR(C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, DHANBAD

का. आ. 768.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बेस कंसट्रक्शन बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 31/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

In the matter of a reference U/s 10 ( 1 ) (d) (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act .

Reference No. 335 of 1999

[सं. एल-42012/94/92- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डैस्क अधिकारी PARTIES :

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

Employers in relation to the management of Western Jharia Area ofM/s . B.C.C. Ltd. AND TheirWorkmen

PRESENT: Shri B. B. Biswas, Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES :

None

For the Employers

S. O..-Inpursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 31/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Beas Construction Board and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 3-3-2004 .

For the Workmen

None

[No. L-42012/94/92- IR(DU) ] State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer.

Dated, the 3rd February, 2004

ANNEXURE

AWARD

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri S. M. Goel

PresidingOfficer:

Case No. ID 31/93

By Order No. L- 20012/ 372 / 99 - IR( C- 1 ) dated 2-12-99 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

ChhotaRam son of Bikka Ram , Village Parnali , District Bilaspur,HP

"Whether the action of the management of Western Jharia Area of M/ s . BCCL , to dismiss Shri Butan Bouri

Applicant [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Versus

1. General Manager BCB. BBMB , Secretariat, Sector - 19B, Chandigarh.

2. Executive Engineer, BCB (Power Wing Bhiwani)

3. ChiefEngineer , BCB (Power Wing) , Sector- 17, Chandigarh

...Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

: Shri Dhani Ram.

: Ms. Neeru Chadha For theManagement

AWARD

(Passed on 11-02-2004)

Central Govt. Vide Notification No. L -42012/94/92- IR(DU) dated 24th of February , 1993 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Beas ConstructionBoard (Power Wing) in terminating the services of Shri Chhota Ram son of Bikka Ram is justified? Ifnot, what relief he is entitled to ?" 2. It is pleaded in the claim statement by the workman that he was appointed on 3-11-1986 in DPH & TLSC Division Slapper and he was given the orders on 6-5-1991 for doing the duty at Ranjit Sagar Dam on job orderand that order expired on 14-5-91 . On 5-6-1991 hewas transferred to Ranjit Sagar dam and no order to this effect was given to the workman. It is further pleaded that he fell ill inhis village on 4-6-1991 and due to the illness he could not return to duty up to 22-6-1991 . It is further pleaded that whenhe reported for duty alongwith medical certificate on 23-6-1991 , he was told that his services have been retrenched w.e.f. 5-6-1991 without any notice . It is pleaded that the action of the management in terminating his services w.e.f. 5-6-1991 is illegal and he may be ordered to be reinstated in service with full back wages and other attendant benefits .

3. In written statement it is pleaded by the management that on completion of the Beas Project, the Beas Construction Board ceased to exist and workcharged employees, casual and contract workers and those engaged on contingent basis , had no right to continue in employment with the Beas Construction Board after the completion ofthe Beas Project. The Central Administrative Tribunal gave directions to the Management to regularise the services of the applicant in OA No. 468/87 or in the alternative to accommodate them on equivalent posts and in the event of their retrenchment , the applicants shall be entitled to the retrenchment compensations as per rules . In pursuance of the above orders , the management tried to adjust the surplus Staff on job order basis in other organisation on humanitarian grounds and as per

1423

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र7 , 1926

requirement ofPunjab Govt . they were sent onjob order at Ranjit Sagar Dam and the applicant himself chose not to be deployed at Ranjit Sagar dam and he was retrenched as per Section 25FFF( 2) of the I.D. Act and thus he is not entitled tobe reinstated. It is pleaded that the applicant was present onduty at Slapper on 4-6-1991 and the medical certificate which has been produced by him does not show that he was admitted in hospital at Ghumarwin and he was only under observation. There was no request of the applicant for leaving his headquarter and going to his home town where he has stated to have fallen ill. The applicant had wilfully evaded his duty and did not report for duty at Ranjit Sagar Dam at Shahpur Kundi and it tentamounts to withdrawal of consent given by him earlier and refusal to accept the offer made to him as per notice dated 6-5-1991 wherein it was clearly stated that in case he does not accept the offer made to him he would entail his retrenchment as per law. As such he has rightly been reternched U /s 25FFF ofthe I.D. Act 1947, and the workman is not entitled to any reliefand the reference deserves rejection .

4.Replication was also filed reiterating the claim made inthe claim statement.

5. Inevidence, the workman filed his affidavit Ex . W1 and documents Ex . W2 to W4 . He has admitted in cross- examination that he gave his consent to resume duty at RanjitSagarDam in persuance of notice dated 6-5-1991 . He has also admitted that he was did not admitted in any hospital on 4-6-1991 . In rebuttal the management produced as many as three witnesses and also documents Ex. M3 to M5 and M7 toM24 .

6. I have heard the learned rep . of the parties and have gone through the record and documents of the case. The learned rep . of the workman has argued that the services of the workman were terminated without following the procedure prescribed U/ s 25 F of the I.D. Act, 1947, therefore, the workman is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages . On the other hand, the leamed rep . of the management has argued that the workman himself chose not to go to the Ranjit Sagar Dam or job order basis and as there was no work available with the management, the management had no optionbut to retrench the services of the workman U/ s 25FFF of the I.D. Act 1947. It is further argued that the retrenchment compensation was also sent to the address of the workman but the cheque was returned by the postal authorities.

7. Ihave carefully gone through the rival contentions of the parties . It is admitted by the applicant in his cross- examination that he left the venue without informing the management and there he fell ill . It is admitted case ofthe parties , that the workman of Beas Project has completed and on the directions of Hon'ble C.A.T. , the applicant alongwith other co - workers was deputed on work order at Ranjit Sagar Dam on the demand of the Punjab Govt. The 1424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRIA 7 , 1926

workman himself did not report for duty at Ranjit Sagar Dam and no information was also given to the workman about his illness which showed his intentions not to work atRanjit Sagar Dam on work order basis . The conduct of the workman clearly reflects that he was not willing to work at Ranjit Sagar Dam. Although it was made clear to the workman that in case the applicant was not willing to work, his services would be retrenched as there was no work at Beas Project and the applicant was retrenched U/ s 25FFF ofthe I.D. Act 1947. It is admitted by the workman thathe left for his home and it appears that the applicant was not willing to work at Ranjit Sagar Dam and he was rightly retrenched by the management for which the retrenchment compensation was also sent to the applicant at his home address which was received back with the management . In view ofthe aforesaid situation it can safely be held that the workman was not willing to work at Ranjit Sagar Dam and wasrightly retrenched.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, DHANBAD PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 221 of 1999

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of B & K Area of M/s . C.C. L. and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman

None.

Onbehalf ofthe employers : None.

State: Jharkhand

8. Inview ofthe discussions made in the earlier paras, it is held that the services of the workman were rightly terminated as he was not willing to work at Ranjit Sagar Dam for which the retrenchment compensation was also sent. The workman is not entitled to any relief except the retrenchment compensation which is still lying with the management. The reference is answered accordingly. Central Govt . be informed.

Chandigarh.

11-2-2004

S.M. GOEL, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 769.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 221/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/557/98- आई.आर. (सी- I ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 769. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 221/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CCLand their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004 .

[No. L- 20012/557/ 98 - IR(C-I) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

Industry : Coal Dhanbad, the 4th February, 2004

ORDER

TheGovt . of India, Minstry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudicatiori vide their Order No. L-20012 /557 / 98 -C-I dated, the 17th May, 1999.

"Whether the demand of Sh . B. K. P. Sinha for enhancement of conveyance allowance from Rs . 75/ - to 175/-w.e.f. 1989 and to Rs . 330/-w.e.f. 1994 from themanagement of CCL, B & K Area, Justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled? " 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, the management side though appeared on one occasion but failed to submit any written statement . It is seen from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 10-6-99 and since then it is pending for disposal. As the concemed workman failedto appear, registered notices were issued to the workman side but in spite of issuance of notices they failed to appear before this Tribunal . They also did not even respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . In natural course the question will arise is what will be the fate ofthe reference made by the Ministry for its disposal. The reference is made on the basis of dispute raised by the concerned workman/ union. Naturally responsibility rests with the concerned workman/ union to assist the Court to dispose of the reference in issue on merit . In view of the decision reported in 2002 (94) FLR 624 it will not bejust and proper to pass ' No dispute ' Award when both parties remain absent . There is also no scope to answer the reference on merit suo moto in absence of any W.S. and available documents . There is no dispute to hold that when any reference is made it is expected to be disposed of on meritbut when the parties do not take any step or do not consider even to file W.S./documents such expectation to [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1425

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

dispose ofthe reference on merit comes to an end. It is not expected that for years together the Court will pursue the matter suo moto with the expectations for appearance of the workman in spite of issuance of repeated registered notices. As per I.D. Act the workman excepting under provisions of Section 2A is debarred from raising any industrial dispute. The disputes are mainły raised by the Union for their workman. These unions in spite of receiving notices do not care to appear before the Court for the interest of the workman and as a result they have been deprived ofgetting anyjustice . Until and unless the attitude ofthe union is changed I consider that this uncalled for situation will persist . Definitely it is the duty of the Court to dispose of the reference on merit but it depends on the cooperation of both sides. Here the record will clearly expose that sufficient opportunities had been given to the workman/union but yielded no result . This attitude shows clearly that the workman side is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case for disposal on merit.

Under the facts and circumstances , I do not find any sufficient reason to drag on the case for an indefinite period.Accordingly as there is no scope to dispose of the reference in question on merit, the same is closed.

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली , 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 770.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 237/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012 /268/2001- आई .आर. (सी -1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 770. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government here by publishes the award (Ref. No. 237/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004.

[No. L-20012/268/2001 - IR(C -I)] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2), AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas, Presiding

Officer.

826 G1/04-20

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

ReferenceNo. 237 of 2001

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the

management of Mudidih Colliery

of M/s. B.C.CL. and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalfofthe workman

:. None

: None.

Onbehalf ofthe employers

State

: Jharkhand

Coal

Industry

Dhanbad, Dated the 4th February, 2004

AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Minstry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/268/ 2001- IR(C-I) , dated, the 19th May, 2001 ..

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Mudidih Colliery innon-regularisation of S/Shri S. N. Prasad, KameshwarPrasad Singh, Upendra Prasad Singh and Shyam Behari Singh in clerical jobs in Justified? If not, to what relief are the concerned workman is entitled and from what date ?"

2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor hisrepresentative appeared before this Tribunal . None also appeared on behalf of the management . The instant reference case is pending since 28-9-2001 for disposal and several notices and show cause notices were issued to the parties, for causing their appearance . But inspite of issuance of notices and show cause notices they failed to appear before this tribunal for taking necessary steps in the matter of hearing of this case. Gesture of the parties show that they are not willing to proceeding with the hearing ofthis case. Under the circumstances, a 'No dispute' Award isrendered and the instant reference is disposed ofon the basis of ' No dispute' Award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties presently.

B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer .

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 771.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 179/2000 ) को 1426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004 /CHAITRA 7 , 1926

प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/353/ 2000-आई.आर. (सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 771 .--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government here by publishes the award (Ref. No. 179/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal II, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ILSCO and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004.

[No. L- 20012/353/2000- IR(C-I)] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2), AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , PresidingOfficer.

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 179 of 2000

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of IISCO and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. K. Chakravorty, Advocate. On behalf of the employers : Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate.

Jharkhand State :

Coal

Industry

Dhanbad, Dated , the 4th February , 2004

AWARD

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) (d) of the 1. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/ 353/2000 - IR ( C-I ) , dated, the 29th November, 2000.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . IISCO Ltd. , in denial of Technical Gr. B to Shri Pancham Koiri & Bachan Koiri of Jitpur Colliery is Justified and legal ? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled and from what date ? "

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2. In this reference learned Advocates of both sides appeared but they failed to submit W.S. Subsequently on the date fixed learned Advocate for the concerned workmen submitted that the concerned workmen involved in this dispute are not turning up and for which he is unable to proceed with this case . It reveals from the record that the instant reference was received by this Tribunal on 22-12- 2000 and since then it is pending for disposal . When the concerned workmen have failed to file W.S. there is no reason to drag on the same for days together. Under such . circumstances , a 'No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of 'No dispute' Award presuming non -existence of any industrial disputebetween the parties.

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer . नईदिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 772.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 222/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/ 559/97- आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 772. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 222/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunał II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004.

[No. L-20012/559/ 97 -IR(C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the I. D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 222 of 1998

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area of M/ s. B.C.C. L. and their workman.

1427

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

None.

Onbehalfofthe workman :

between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and theirworkman, which was received bythe Central Government on 27-2-2004.

None.

Onbehalfofthe employers :

[No. L-20012/443/2000- IR(C-I)] Jharkhand

State

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secv Coal

Industry

ANNEXURE

Dhanbad, Dated the 4th February, 2004

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AWARD

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) , AT DHANBAD

PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer .

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 559/97- IR(C- I) , dated, the 30th November, 1991 .

Reference No. 42 of 2001 SCHEDULE

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and theirworkman.

APPEARANCES :

"Whether the denial of management of Kusunda Area of BCCL, to designate Sri N.K. Chouhan, Sr. Sales Asstt . as Weigh Bridge Incharge as per his work performed is Justified? If so, to what relief is theworkman concerned is entitled?"

: None.

Onbehalf ofthe workman

Onbehalfof the employers

Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate.

State

Jharkhand Coal

Industry

Dhanbad, Dated the 5th February, 2004

AWARD

'TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute tothis Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/443/ 2000(C-I), dated, the 12th Feb. , 2001.

SCHEDULE

2. In this reference both the parties appeared on one occasion and filed their respective Written Statement. Subsequently both the parties abstained from appearing before this Triburial for taking further steps in the matter of hearing ofthe instant reference although repeated registered notices were issued to them . The reference has been received by this Tribunal on 22-12-98 and since then it is pending for disposal . The gesture of the parties shows that they are not willing to proceed further with the hearing ofthis Case and this Tribunal cannot allow adjournment in way. Under such circumstances , a 'No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of 'No dispute 'Award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties, presently.

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

"Whether the action of the managemerit of M/s . IISCO Ltd., in not providing employment to Smt . Ushihan Khatoon W/o. late Islam Mia, Tyndel of Noonodih Jitpur Colliery is Justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the said dependent of the deceased employee entitled?"

का. आ. 773.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/443/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, the management side representedthrough their learned Advocate . From the record it transpires that sufficient opportunities were given tothe parties to file their respective Written Statement, but inspite of getting sufficient opportunities they failed to file their respective written statement . Therefore , there is reason to believe that the parties are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case . Under such circumstances , a'No dispute' Award is rendered presuming non -existence ofany industrial dispute between the parties presently.

B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer.

S. O. 773.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 42/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute 1428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

"Whether the demand of the union to place Shri Narayan Bhuiya Tyndel in the category V is justified andproper ? Ifso , to what relief is the workman entitled and fromwhat date?"

का. आ. 774.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 123/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-20012/157/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared. However, though the management side appeared through their learned Advocate but subsequently abstained from appearing before this Tribunal . It reveals from the record that the instant reference is pending since 1-10-2000 and ample opportunities were given to the workman side but inspite ofgetting ample opportunities they failed to appear before this Tribunal for taking necessary steps in the matter of hearing of this case . The gesture of the workman shows that he is not willing to proceed further in the case. Under such circumstances , a ' No dispute' Award is passed presuming non-existence of any industrial dispute between theparties.

S. O. 774. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 123/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004.

B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

[No. L- 20012/ 157/2000-IR(C-I)] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

का. आ. 775.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( Comp . No. 2 of 1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1) (d) of the 1. D. Act, 1947

[सं. एल-20012/219/92- आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव Reference No. 123 of 2000

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004 PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L and theirworkman .

APPEARANCES :

None

Onbehalf of the workman

None

Onbehalf of the employers :

S. O. 775. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Comp . No. 2 of97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 27-2-2004 .

State

Jharkhand

Coal

Industry

[No. L-20012/2-19/92 -IR(C -1)] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

Dhanbad, Dated the 5th February, 2004 AWARD

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) , AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( I ) ( d) of the 1. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 157/2000 - IR( C - I) ,dated, the 27th September, 2000.

In the matter of Complaint under Section 33A of the I. D. Act, 1947 1429

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Complaint No. 2of 1997

Parties:

Hookum Mali and others

...Complainant

versus

Agent, Kendwadih Colliery of M/s. B.C.C.L. , P.O. Kusunda, Distt . Dhanbad

...Opp.Party (Arising out ofRef. No. 113 of 1993-Ministry's Order No. L-20012(219 )/92 -IR (C -I), dt. 28-7-93 ) .

Appearances:

None

Onbehalfof the complainants:

Onbehalf of the O. Ps . : None

State

: Jharkhand

: Coal

Industry

Dhanbad, Dated the 5th February, 2004

AWARD

This is a complaint petition under Section 33A of the I.D. Act filed by the complainant named above against the O.P.Management .

It reveals from the record that neither the complainants nor their representative appeared . None also appeared on behalf of the O.P. management . It reveals further that the instant complaint case is pending since 27-10-87 and ample opportunities were given to the complainants but inspite of getting ample opportunities they failed to take any steps in the matter of hearing of this case . Therefore , there is reason to believe that the complainants are not interested to proceed further. Under such circumstances , the complaint petition filed by the complainant is dismissed for default .

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 776.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/492/2000- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 776. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government here by publishes the award (Ref. No. 59/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 27-2-2004 .

[No. L-20012/492/2000- IR(C- I) ]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2), AT DHANBAD Present:

SHRI B. BISWAS, PresidingOfficer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I. D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 59 of 2001

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L and theirworkman .

Appearances:

None

Onbehalf of the workman :

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. U.N. Lal, Advocate .

: Jharkhand State

Coal

Industry

Dhanbad, Dated the 5th February, 2004

AWARD

TheGovt . of India, Minstry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 492/2000 (C- I) , dated, the 19th September,2001.

"Whether the demand of the Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the management ofM/ s . BCCLto regularise the services ofworkman Shri Shiv Lal Manjhi as Night Guard inDobari Colliery is justified, legal and proper? If so, towhat relief is the workman entitled and from what date?"

2. In course of hearing learned Advocate for the management by filing a petition of the concerned workman submitted that as the concerned workman has tendered his resignation which the management accepted , the corfcernedworkman is not willing to proceed further with the hearing of the case . Perused the petition of the concernedworkman and also heard the learned Advocate . Since the concerned workman . has expressed his unwillingness to proceed with the hearing of the case, there remains no more dispute to be adjudicated Under 1430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

such circumstances, a ' No dispute ' Award is rendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of 'No dispute' Award presuming non -existence of any Industrial Dispute between the parties.

B. BISWAS; Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 777.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्कोके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 109/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/235/97 - आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2004

S. O. 777.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 109/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IISCO and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004.

[No. L-20012/235/97-IR(C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) , AT DHANBAD Present:

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer.

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 109 of 1997

Parties :

Employers in relation to the management Chasnalla Colliery of ofM/ s . IISCO and their workman .

Appearances:

Onbehalf of the workman : None

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K.Verma, Advocate .

State

Jharkhand

Coal

Industry

Dhanbad, Dated the 10th February, 2004

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

The Govt . of India , Minstry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/235/97 - IR ( C- I) , dated, the 19th September,1997.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Union for the promotion ofS/Shri D. C. Satnami , Surajnath Rajak, Subhash Paswan , and Shankar Prasad in Technical and Supervisory Grade-B is legal and justified? If so , to what relief are these workmen entitled? "

2. The case ofthe concerned workmen according to the Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union ontheir behalf in brief is as follows :-

The sponsoringUnion submitted that the management in the month ofJuly, 1991 called for interview by letter No. 27/204 dt . 5-6-91 of50 Senior Mining Sirdar and Shotfirers for promotion as Senior Mining Sirdar /Safety Assistant/ Production Assistant/ Stowing incharge in Technical and SupervisoryGrade ' B ' .Accordingly the concerned workman appeared in the interview and produced the required certificates in support of their claim. Inspite of appearing in the interview they alleged that the management without showing any reason denied their promotion in Tech. & Supervisory Grade. 'B ' . They alleged that instead of promoting the concerned workman in Technical and SupervisoryGrade ' B ' on the basis of merit test as per their experience , educational qualification and also on the basis of giving preference as a Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribe candidatethe management changing the criteria ofpromotion started promoting some of them on the basis of S.L.U. They submitted that shifting stand for denial of promotion by the management was illegal and arbitrary and for which they raised an Industrial dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication. Accordingly, the sponsoring Union submitted their prayer to pass award directing the management to pay difference of wages to the concerned workmen from 1991 to the date of their promotion in Technical and Supervisory Grade-B .

3.Management on the contrary after filing written statement-cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in the written statement submitted onbehalf of the concerned workmen, They submitted that a large number of senior workmen than the concerned workmen were working as Mining Sirdar in Technical and Supervisory Grade -C and as there was no vacancy available they were not promoted in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' B ' even after completion of 10 years of service in Tech . & Supervisory Grade-C and that being the position management upgraded 17 workmen in higher grade under SLU scheme . They [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

submitted that when vacancy came into existence promotion of these 17 workmen were considered in Technical and Supervisory Grade -B . They disclosed that as the concerned workmen could not complete their 10 years ofservice in Technical and Supervisory Grade-Cthey were not upgraded under S.L.U. scheme. However, the concerned workmen viz. D. C. Satnami, S.N. Rajak, Subhas Paswan and Shankar Prasad have got their promotion in Technical and Supervisory Grade B with effect from 1-7-97, 1-9-99 , 1-9-99 and 1-7-97 respectively.

Accordingly management submitted that they did not commit any illegality or took any arbitrary decision in upgrading the senior most workmen under S.L. U. scheme and subsequent promotion in Tech . and SupervisoryGrade- Bin consequent to their upgradation under the said Scheme. In view of the facts and circumstances management submitted that the claim of the concerned workmen are not at all tenable and for which they are not entitled to get any relief.

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED whether the demand of the Union for the promotion of S/Shri D.C. Satnami , Surajnath Rajak, Subhash Paswan , and Shankar Prasad in Technical and Supervisory Grade -B is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief are these workmen entitled? "

FINDINGS WITH REASONS

5. Ittranspires from the record that inspite of giving repeated opportunity neither the concerned workman appeared in course of hearing nor they considered necessary to adduce any evidence with a view to substantiate their claim . Accordingly the instant case was fixed for ex -parte evidence of the management but on the date of ex -parte hearing management also declined to adduce any evidence.

Considering the written statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on behalf of the concerned workmen' it transpires that the management called for interview by letter No. 27/204 dt . 5-6-91 of50 mining Sirdars and shot firers for considering their promotion as Mining Sirdar/Safety Assistant Production Assistant etc. and asked the workmen to come with all papers relating to their educational qualification as well as professional certificates . The concernedworkmen appeared before the interview with all requisite papers but they were denied promotion in Technical & Supervisory Grade B from Grade ' C ' by the management without showing any cogent reason . They alleged that instead of giving promotion in Technical and SupervisoryGrade B on the basis of interview management started promoting some ofthe workmen under service linked upgradation scheme illegally and arbitrarily and for which they were prejudiced seriously. On the contrary management in their written statement without making any whisper about interview submitted that a large number of

1431

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

senior workmen who were senior to the concerned workmen were working as Mining Sirdar in Technical and Supervisory, Grade ' C' and they could not get any scope to give their promotion inTechnical and Supervisory Grade-B for want ofvacant post even after completion of 10 years of service in the same grade. Considering that situation they upgraded 17 workmen in the higher grade under S.L.U. and subsequently those 17 workmen were regularised as Senior Mining Sirdar in Technical and Supervisory Grade B. They further submitted that as the concerned workmen were juniors at that relevant time there was no scope for up gradation of their post under S.L.U. scheme. However, subsequently during the period from 1-7-97 to 1-9-99 the concerned workmen also have got their promotion in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' B' .

The grievance of the concerned workmen is that though management called for interview of50 workmen for considering their promotion in Technical and Supervisory Grade B it was not acted upon and instead they gave promotiontosome workmen under S.L.U. It is the specific contention of the management that they had to upgrade the post of 17 workmen under S.L.U. Scheme in absence of specific vacancy as these workmen remained in the same post for more than 10 years . They further submitted that theconcernedworkmen werejuniors to those 17 workmen whose posts were upgraded . Learned Advocate for the management is course of hearing submitted that in mining industry S.L.U. scheme is very much in operation with a view to give relief to the workmen whose promotion have been stagnant for want of vacancy.

The grievance of the workmen as it appears that though they were prepared for the interview had been deprived of due to arbitrary decision of the management . For various reasons arrangement of interview may be recalledand there is no scope to say that for such withdrawal ofinterview they committed any illegal act. On the contrary it transpires that the most senior workmen who were in the post of Foreman in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' C ' for more than 10 years had been provided with the facility ofS.L.U. and those workmen were subsequently regularised in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' B ' . It is the claim of the management that these workmen were muchjuniors to those workmen and for which they could not be considered for relief under S.L.U. though subsequently their cases were considered in between the period from1-7-97 to 1-9-99 and they have got their promotion in Technical and SupervisoryGradeB.

It is not the case of the concerned workmen that they were superseded by those workmen who got their promotion under S.L.U. Question of giving promotion in higher post only arises if their remains clear vacancy. It is not the case of the concerned workmen that inspite of existence ofclear vacancy the management deprived them from getting their promotion .

1432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/ CHAITRA 7, 1926

Considering all aspects carefully there is sufficient reason to believe that management rightly took the decision to upgrade 17 workmen under S.L.U. who were not only senior to the concerned workmen but also remained in the same post for more than 10 years . Therefore, as the management cancelled interview it would not mean thatto deprive the concerned workmen they took that decision onthe contrary it shows that at least 17 workmen who were senior to the concerned workmen received compassionate treatment from the management who were rolling in the same post for more than ten years.

In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I find no reason at all to draw any conclusion that management either took any arbitrary decision or committed any illegal act cancelling the interview and upgrading 17 workmen under S.L.U.

Inthe result, the following award is rendered :---

" The demand of the Union for the promotion of S/ Shri D.C. Satnami , Surajnath Rajak, Subhash Paswan and Shankar Prasad in Technical and Supervisory Grade-B is not legal and justified . Consequently, the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief. "

B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 778.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 110/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सस्कार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/498/2000- आई.आर. ( सी -1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 778. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government here by publishes the award (Ref.. No. 110/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-2-2004 .

[No. L-20012/498/2000-IR(C-I)]

S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

Present:

SHRI B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 Reference No. 110 of2001

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of M/ s. B.C.C.L. and theirworkman .

Appearances:

None.

Onbehalf ofthe workman :

Onbehalfofthe employers : Mr. H. Nath, Advocate.

Jharkhand Coal

State Industry

Dhanbad, Dated the 11th February, 2004

AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Minstry of Labour , in exercise of thepowers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-200 12 /498/ 2000- IR(C -I) , dated, the 29th March, 2001 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management ofM/s. BCCL in not providing the promotional benefits to the workman Sri Ali Mohammad, Asstt. Foreman Grade ' C' ofBhalgora 33 -K.V. Sub - station underKustore Area is justified, legal and proper ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled and from what date ?" 2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . Management , however, made their appearance through their learned Advocate and took steps in the matter ofhearing ofthe case . Subsequently, as the concerned workman failed to turn up the case was fixed for evidence of the management ex-parte . Learned Advocate for the management declined to adduce any evidence stating the facts that the concerned workmán has not submited any W.S. It also transpires from the record that inspite of giving several opportunities the concerned workman did not consider necessary to submit W.S. , or rejoinder. Accordingly the case of the management was close, on prayer . As the concerned workman neither submitted any W.S. nor took any step there is sufficient reason to believe that he is not interested to proceed with thehearing ofthis case. Accordingly a ' No dispute ' Award isrendered and the instant reference is disposed of on the basis of' No dispute' Award presuming non -existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.

B. BISWAS , PresidingOfficer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1433

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/ चैत्र 7, 1926

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

justified? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to?"

2.The case ofthe concerned workman accordingto thewritten statement submitted by the sponsoring union onhis behalf, inbrief, is as follows:

का. आ. 779.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधौगिक अधिकरण- II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 50/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार की 27-02-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 20012/156/95- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rdMarch, 2004

S. O. 779.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/ 1996) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 27-02-04.-

[No. L-20012/156/95 -IR(C- 1)]

S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reference No. 50 of 1996

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Moonidih Project of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen.

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workmanwas originally appointed as Electrical Helperat Moonidia Project (UG ) by the management in Category- 1 wages on5-11-86 . They disclosed that in consideration of his good performance as Electrical Helper the concerned workmanwas posted to work as Face Crew at ML- II/S since 13-7-89 and in the said capacity he discharged his duties to the full satisfaction ofthe management and received Face Crewwagesduring the period ofhis posting in that capacity. They submitted that for his good performance as Face Crewthe concerned workman was recommended for his training at Rescue Station, Dhansar vide Office orderNo. MND/Supdt/Rescue/93/ 169 dated 10-4-93. They alleged that the management with some ulterior motive issued a charge-sheet to the concerned workman on some occasion only on the ground that the concerned workman used to participate in the trade union Affiliation Act. Thay disclosed that inspite of issuance of charge -sheet on different occasions the management did not conduct any domestic enquiry against him. On the contrary. with some vindictive attitude he was removed from his place of employment without issuance of any notice under Sec.9-A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. They alleged that the management refused to give him any promotion since 1991 though he was very much eligible to get his promotion under the cadre scheme/promotion rules for Electrical &Mechanical Disciplines last envisaged under theNational Coal Wage Agreement - III and for which he was supersided by his juniors , some of whom have since beenplaced inTechnical Grade' C.

PRESENT:

SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers : Shri B.M. Prasad , Advocate ,

For the Workmen Shri S.C. Gour, Advocate .

State: Jharkhand.

Industry:Coal.

Dated, the 12th February, 2004

AWARD

Theydisclosed that for such discriminatory attitude of the management they submitted representations for consideringpromotion ofthe concerned workman but the management did not pay any heed to their representations andfor which the concerned workman inspite of his having requisite qualification has been deprived of getting his promotion till date . Accordingly, they raised an industrial disputebefore the A.L.C. ( C), Dhanbad- III for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The sponsoring union accordingly submitted prayer to pass award with direction to the management of Moonidih Project to provide promotion to the concerned workman from the year 1991 as Electrician.

By Order No L- 20012/ 156/95-1.R. ( Coal - I ) dated 11-6-1996 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub -section ( 1 ) and Sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the claim of the union that the management of Moonidih Project (UG) ofM/s . BCCL in denying promotion w.e.f 1991 to Shri Radha Rama Parshad , Electrical Helper is

3. The management, on the contrary, after filing written statement -cum -tejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in thewritten statement on behalf of the concerned workman . They submitted that the concerned workman holds his substantive designation of Electrical Helper and his 826 Gi/04-21 1434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

circumstances the management accordingly submitted their prayer topass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman.

Points to be decided:

4. "Whether the claim of the union that the management ofMoonidih Project (UG) ofM/s. B.C.C.L. in denying promotion w.e.f. 1991 to Shri Radha Raman Prasad, Electrical Helper is justified? If so, to what relief is the concernedworkman entitled to ?"

Finding with reasons:

5. It transpires from the record that the concerned workman in order to substantiate his claim examined himself as WW-1 in the instant case. On the contrary, the management has failed to examine any witness on their part.

Now, consideringthe facts disclosed in the pleadings onboth sides and also considering evidence of the concerned workman I find no dispute to hold that the concernedworkman got his appointment as an Electrical Helper at Moonidih Project (UG) under the management in Category- II wages w.c.f. 5-11-1986. WW- 1 during his evidence disclosedthat he is a matriculate with ITI diploma inelectrical.

promotion is guided by JBCCI Circular No. 30 dated 26-6-1984. As per the aforesaid circular the promotion of personnel in electrical and mechanical disciplines are tobe governed as per laid down procedure in the aforesaid circular. Annexure VII- 15 attached to the above circular relates to promotion of electrical personnel. A workman with three years experience as General Mazdoor Category- 1 or with one year experience in Category - I having educational qualification of matriculation with ITI maybe selected for the post of Electrical Helper on the basis of recommendation made by D.P.C. and satisfactory performance oftrade test. Similarly an electrical helper with three years of experience in Category - II for literate and two years experience for matriculate with ITI may be considered for promotion to the post of Electrician/Electrical Fitter in Category- 1V provided he competes the trade test and is adjudged as suitable for his promotion by the D.P.C. The D.P.C. is required to consider all the persons eligible for promotion working in the entire area. After adjudging their suitability and their past conduct together with the results ofthe trade test, the list of persons suitable for promotion from Electrical Helper in Category - II to Electrician in Category - IV is prepared by the D.P.C. The management submitted that the case of the concerned workman was considered by the D.P.C. in the year 1991 along with other eligible candidates for their promotion to the post of Electrician in Category - IV. After test, the D.P.C. published a list of successful candidates . The name of the concerned workman was not included in the said successful list of the candidates as he could not come out successfully by the D.P.C. They submitted that the management is requiredto followthe Cadre Scheme while considering for promotion to all similar eligible candidates and the D.P.C. cannot show partiality in recommending some persons on the consideration of their position in the Trade Union . They submitted that as the concerned workman was given opportunity sometime to work as Electrician by his controlling authority definitely that would not confer any right on him to claim his promotion as Electrician. They submitted that the Electrical Helpers possessing wireman's certificate are given chance to work as Electician for doing some minor repairing jobs so that they can gain confidence inworking as Electrician and learn the Job of Electrician, so that at the time to considering their promotion they get some benefits for their past performance . It is the specific claim of the management that as per JBCCI Circular No. 30 dated 26-6-1984 it is mandatory on the part of the Electrical Helper to face D.P.C. and he will be eligible for getting his promotion as Electrician subject to his recommendation by the D.P.C. As the concerned workman was not recommended by the D.P.C. after trade test his name was not enlisted for his promotion to the post of Electrician and accordingly they categorically denied the fact that they have committed any illegality and took any arbitrary decision in not considering the promotion of the concerned workman to the post ofElectrician. In view ofthe facts any

He submitted that the management of Moonidih Project considering his qualification authorised him to act as electrician. The said order issuedby the management during his evidence was marked as Ext . W- 1. He further disclosed thatby Office Order he was allowed to work as FaceCrew, The said Office Order during his evidencewas marked as Ext . W-2 . Belying on theOffice Orders marked Ext. W- 1 and W- 2 it has been submittedby the concerned workman that inspite of his experience and sufficient qualification the management have refused to give him promotion as Electrician since 1991. He disclosed that while the management deprived him from his legitimate promotion they did not hesitate to give promotion to his Juniors and for which he has become junior to them. It is specific allegation of the concerned workman that due to arbitrarydecision ofthe management he has been deprived ofgetting his promotion as Electrician Category- IV. On the contrary, themanagement relying on JBCCI Circular No. 30 dated 26-6-1984 submitted that the promotion ofpersonnel in electrical and mechanical disciplines are to be governed asperthe procedure laid down in the circular. They further disclosed that Annexure VII- 15 ofthe said circular clearly has pointed out how promotion of electrical personnel should be considered . As per the said circular it has been disclosed that a workman with three years experience as general mazdoor Category - I or with one year experience in Category- I having educational qualification of matriculation with ITI may be selected for the post of Electrical Helper on the basis of recommendations made by DPC and on satisfactory performance of trade test . Similarly anElectrical Helper with three years of experience in Category- Il for 1435 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

Category-IV. Therefore, there is no scope to say that the management took any arbitrary decision in withholding his promotion. The learned Advocate for the concerned workman in course ofhearing has failed to place any matcriel point relying onwhich it can be said that the management hadthe scope togive promotion to the concernedworkman to the post of Electrician Category- IVby-passing the recommendation of DPC and also by-passing the instructions given in the Circular No. 30 dated 26-6-84. It is clear, considering all the materials on record that consideration of promotion to the post of Electrician Category -IVonly can be considered by the management if the workman contorned passed teadetest and his name is recommended by DPC . The learned Advocate for the concernedworksman submitted that the asanagement took discriminatory attitude against the concerned ,worlunan but has failed to show what discriminatory attitude the management showed against the concerned workman . The DPC is an independent body and the management has no scope at all to influence the members of DPC to pass any adversedecision against a workman in spite ofhis having good result in the trade test. !

Accordingly, after careful consideration of all the facts I hold that the concerned workman could not get his promotion to the post of Electrician Category-IV as his name was not recommended by DPC and not for the whimsical and arbitrary decision of the management. Accordingly, I find no scope to say that the management committedany illegality in not considering his promotion tothepostofElectrician Category - IV and for which the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

7. Inthe result, 1 render the following award,-

The claim of the union that the management of Moonidih Project (UG) ofM/s, BCCL in denying promotion w.e.f. 1991 to ShriRadha Raman Prasad, ElectricalHelper is not justified. Hence, the concerned workman is not entitled toget anyrelief.

B.BISWAS, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

literate and two years experience for matriculate with ITI maybe considered for promotion to the post ofElectrician/ Electrical Fitter in Category-IV provided he completes trade testand is adjudged suitable for his promotion by the D.P.C. Here in the instant case the concerned workman got his appointment as Electrical Helper Category- II . It is seen further that the concerned workman is a matriculateand is holding ITI diploma. Therefore , according to this circular the concernedworkman was eligible to appearbefore the DPC for consideration of his promotion in the post of electrician/electrical fitter Category- IV as he-by that time acquired two years experience . The concerned workman duringhis evidence admitted that the DPC recommended promotiononconsidering performance report, possessing ofrequisitecertificate etc. As per Annexure-VII- 15 ofJBCCI No. 30 dated 26-6-84 it is mandatory for the workmanto face DPC and also to prove their eligibility in the tradetest. It is the specific claim ofthe management that the concerned workman in the 1991 appeared before the DPC and trade test but as he could not come out successfully the DPC did not recommend his name for his promotion in Electrician Category- IV. It has been specifically alleged by the concerned workman that for his trade union activities the management intentionally on some occasions issued charge-shoot to him. He alleged that in spite of ismance of charge-sheet the management did not conduct any domestic enquiry against him and taking that vindictive attitude they influenced the DPC and for which his name was not considered by the DPC for his promotion in Electrician Category- IV. The management admitted the fact of issuance of charge -sheet on some occasions against the concernedworkman but categorically denied the fact that due tohis trade union activities the said charge-sheet was issued. They submitted that for dereliction of duties the charge-sheet was issued. They further submitted that in case of promotion the DPC not only consider the qualification, experience but also very seriously consider his past conduct . They further submitted that as promotion in electrician Category- IV is guided by JBCCI Circular No. 30 dated 26-6-84 and also as it is a cadre post there was no scope on the part of the management to give him promotion as electrician in Category- IV superseding the recommendation ofDPC and also by-passing the instruction given in Circular No. 30 dated 26-6-84.

का. आर. 780.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का. 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीज, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण- II धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-02-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 20012/94/2002 - आईआरसी

एस.एस. रसभिय

NewDelhi, the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 780.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award 6. The learned Advocate of the concerned workman in course of hearing argument relied on the decision reported in 2000 (4) PLJR (SC) 94. Considering the said decision it transpires that in the said case the concerned workman was selected by DPC but his name was kept in sealed cover as domestic enquiry was pending against him. Here it is not the case ofthe concerned workmanthat DPC in spite of recommending his name for promotion was deprived of getting his privilage due to arbitrary decision taken by the management . Here in the instant case it is seen that the name of the concerned workman was not at all recommended by DPC for his promotion in electrician 1436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

(Ref. No. 75/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court II Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27-02-2004.

[No. L- 20012/94/2002-IR(C- 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, AT DHANBAD In the matter of a reference U/ S 10 ( 1 ) (d ) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reference No. 75 of 2002

PARTIES :

AND

Employers in relation to the management of Amlabad Project ofM/ S . B.C.C. Ltd. Their Workmen.

PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For the Management : Shri U.N. Lal, Advocate. For the Workmen : None.

State:Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated, the 12th February, 2004

AWARD

By order No L-20012/94/2002 -I.R. (C-I) dated 7th October, 2002 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferredby Clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub- section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

[PART I SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4.Accordingly, I render a 'No Dispute' Award in thepresent casepresuming non -existance of any industrial dispute betweenthe parties.

B.BISWAS, Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 781. - औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन एअरलाइंस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीत्र, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण- II नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 1-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल -11012/27/96 -भाई.आर. ( सी -1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 781. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government, hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 34/97) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation tothemanagement of Indian Airlines and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 1-3-04.

[No. L -11012/27/96- IR (C- 1 )] S. S, GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : CUM LABOUR COURT-IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI

R. N. RAI, PresidingOfficer:

L. D. No. 34 of 1997

BabuRam

Versus

Indian Airlines

" क्या नेशनल कोल वर्कर्स काँग्रेस की भारत कोकिंग कोल लिमिटेड अमलाबाद कोलियरी के प्रबन्धतन्त्र से मांग की कि कर्मकार हरि पदा मोदी के आश्रित पुत्र श्री बुधान मोदी को एन.सी. डब्ल्यु.ए. के प्रावधानुसार अनुकम्पा आधार पर सेवायोजन का लाभ दिया जाये उचित एंव न्यायसंगत है ? यदि हाँ तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र है ? "

2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor his representative is found present to-day on call . Shri U.N. Lal, learned Advocate for the management is present.

3. It transpires from the record that in spite of issuance of repeated notices the concerned workman has failed to appear before this Tribunal to take steps. The concerned workman also did not consider necessary to submit any written statement. Accordingly if the conduct ofthe concerned workman is taken into consideration it will expose that he is not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case . In the circumstances , I do not find any reason to adjourn the case suo moto .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour letter dated 24-2-1997 has referred the following points for adjudication to this Tribunal.

Whether the claim of Sh. Babu Ram , Casual Attendant, that his services were illegally terminatedby the management of Indain Airlines w.e.f. 1-5-1995 is legal andjustified ? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In his statement ofclaim he has stated that he had been working in employment of the management since 1990 as attendant. Hehasworked upto 30-04-1995. His services have been 1437 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

The claim of Sh . Babu Ram , casual attendant, that his services were illegally terminated by the management of IndainAirlines w.e.f. 01-05-1995 is neither legal not justified. He is not entitled to get any relief,

Dated: 20-02-2004

terminated from 01-05-1995 without assigning any valid reason. the termination of the services is unjustified and illegal he deserves to be reinstated the persons who worked with him were regularised but his services have notbeen regularised . As such the termination order is illegal and unjustified under the several provisions of the ID Act.

R. N. RAI, Prosiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 78.2.-औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार जिनिश एयरवेज के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट कौद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 144/99) को प्रकाशित मारती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-2-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The management has filed WS . It has been stated in the WS that Sh. Babu Ram has worked as a casual daily rated sweeper for a period of 37 days during the years 1994 and 57 days in the year 1995. He did not work of 240days. It iswrong to say that he has been in service as attendant since 1990. He started working in 1994. In 1994 he worked for 53 days . In 1995 he worked for 37 days there was no employer and employee relation between theworkman and the employer . He was a contract worker andworked on contract for certain period . He never worked for 240 days in a calender year so he is not entitled to anyrelief.

[चं. एल.-11012/23/99-आई.आर. ( सी-1 )] एस . एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिय The workman has filed rejoinder and inhis rejoinder hehas denied the allegation of the WS .

NewDelhi, the 3rd March, 2004

S. 0.782 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government heroby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 144/99) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court II New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of British Airways and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on27-2-04.

[No. L-11012/23/99 -IR(C- 1)] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

Heard arguments from both the sides and persued papers annexedwith the record. The learned counsel has filedwrittenArgument . In written Argument it has been mentioned that it is not sufficient to say that he has not worked for more than 240 days in a calender year. He worked from 1990 to 13 April 1995 with artificial breaks. The management has retained wages several employees working as attendant on daily who were junior to him, He also argued that he was appointed at the post of leader. It is true that he has not served for 240 days in a calender year. The workman has filed certain vouchers through which he has received payment.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : CUM LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI R.N. RAI , ProsidingOfficer LD. No. 144/99

Inthe matter of:-

The learned counsel for the management submitted that inhis cross examination the workman has stated that the span ofhis work was for 5 years. He worked for 300 days in total, He worked in 1990 for 60 days . In 1991 for 90days . In 1994 for 90 days but he did not work in 1995, He has also admitted that he worked as a loader and sweeper and no other capacity. He has also admitted that itis incorrect that he was entitled to any reinstatement. He has further admitted that at present he is doing the work oflabour.

MS. Ira Kareer Versys

British Airways

The learned counsel for the managemont further argued that at best he worked for 37. He never worked for 240days in calender year.

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour vide its letter dated 28-4-1999 has referred the following point for decision. The point runs as hereunder:-

My attention was drawn to 2002 1LLJ page 211 , The Hon'ble apex court has court has laid down that the tribunal should first decide that the workman has worked for 240 days and the claimant has to prove it. The claimant in this case has not proved that he had worked for 240 days so the workman is not entitled to any relief prayedfor.

The point referred to is replied thus .

"Whether the action of the management of the British Airways, New Delhi in terminating the services of Ms. Ira kareer, Ex. Air Stewardess, w.e.f. 3-10-1998 is justified, valid and legal ? If not what to relief she is entitled to?" 1438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SRC , 3 (ii)]

was excellent, There is no substance in it , She had been informed time and again to improve her performance, but tono effect, Her services were not abruptly terminated on October, 3rd, 1998 but the period of probation was extened and still her performance was found unsatisfactory Therefore, no option was left with the managementbut to terminate her services. The managemorit has denied receipt ofthe legal notion, the raising of dispute in concliliation has been admitted. The claimant was on probation and she had no right to the post. Her services were rightly terminated and her performance was not found satisfactory in the second extended period of probation.

The claimant has filed statement ofclaim. It has been stated in the statement of claim that the workman was issued an appointment letter on 21-08-1997 for the post of Cabin Crew Member in Delhi ( India) w.e.f. 20-8-97 which she accepted and she had been functioning has such since 3-10-1997. It has been further sumbitted that the appointment was on probation for a period of 6 months but despite excellent performance and assessment to be the best of all the crew members for the best reasons known to the management, the probation period was extended further for a period of 6 months more . After the expiry of first probation period, she was confident about her performance but she was disturbed. Therefore, the management in an arbitrary manner terminated the services w.e.f. 3-10-1998 illegally, wrongfully, and unjustifiably and without completing the legal formalities under the I.D. Act. The representation was given which has been marked as Annexure-A. The workman was not reinstated despite service legal notices which has been marked as Annexure "B" . The workman had no other alternative but to file the claim Before Conciliation for her reinstatement but that too failed due to the rigid attitude of the management and thereupon the reference was made to this Tribunal .

The workman has filed rejoinder and in his rajoinder, the allegations ofwritton statement have been denied and it has been omphatically stated that she performed her services satisfactorily. The duties performed by the claimant are ofskilled nature and as such falls within the ambit of Section 2 ( s) ofthe ID Act, 1947. The dispute has rigtlybeen referred to this Tribunal . The managment is guilty ofunfair legal practise. The termination of his services was wrong and unjustified. The management did not act in abonafide way. The wintten statement and the preliminary objections are denied. Some parts ofthe written statement are misconceived. The claimant was never told orally or in writing regarding unsatisfactory gervice.Her services were torminated under the guise of probation period and it is against the principles of natural justice, equity and fair play.

Heard arguments from the side of the management .

The management has field written statement. In his written statement, it has been stated that she was appointed admmittedly as an Air Stewardess and main duties performed by her were not manual , unskilled, skilled, technical, operational or clerical in nature and the claimant is not a workman as defined in Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is obligatory and incumbent upon the claimant to prove as to how the termination of her services was illegal and unjustified. The order ofreference is incompetent and bad in law.

The written arguments has been filed from the side ofthemanagement. My attention was drawn to 1995- I ILJ at page 303 in which the definition ofworkman has been given . In 1982 LIC at page 551 , it has been held that the party challenging the termination shouldprove the claim. It has also been held am in 1979 II ILJ at page 194 and 1984 (49) FL.Rape and 1994 LLR at page 543 and eltation has been given of UCO bank versus the PresidingOfficer and another. In all the citations, it has been held that the party which wants any relief or pleading is to be proved by evidence . In case evidence is not adduced, the relief shall fail . It is obvious that the rulings established that the plaintiff of the claimant has to prove his claim or pleadings in absence of evidence of either of the parties, the pleadings cannot be said to have been proved.

Ithas been further submitted that the claimant was appointed as a Cabin Crew Member in terms of letter of appointment dt. August 21, 1997 initially on training and probation for a period of six months . The work and performance of the claimant was not found satisfactory and she was apprised about the same from time to time. The management would have terminated her services on expiry ofthe period of probation but further opportunity of six months was given and she was specifically informed that in case she did not perform her duties satisfactorily, she would be terminated on the expiry of the extended period of probation.

The learned counsel for the management argued that two issues have been framed.

(1)Whether Ms. Ira Kareer is a workman as defined in Section 2(s) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

It has further submitted that her performance was closely monitored and she was told grally as well as in writing regarding her work and performance during the extended period ofprobation as there was no improvement during the next period of probation, it was decided to icrminate her services and accordingly by letter dt . October 3rd. 1998 , the claimant was informed that her services have come to an end .

(2) Whether the order of reference is incompetent and bad in law for the reasons stated in paras 2 and 3 of the preliminary objections to the written statement filed on behalf of the management ?

It has been further stated that it has wrong to say that during her first probation period, her performance

The first issue is whether Ms. Ira Karoor is a workman or not. She has been appointed admittedly at the post of [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Stewardess . Now the question arises as to Stewardess comes under the definition of the workman or not . The word Stewardess has been defined in Oxford Dictionary as a person who looks after the passengers ofa ship or aircraft and a person responsible for supply of food to a college, club etc. and an official appointed to supervise arrangements at alarge public event or a person employed to manage another's property specially in a large house. When we consider the meaning given in the Oxford Dictionary, the Stewardess simply means a workman who looks after the passengers on a ship or aircraft. As such the duty of Miss Ira Kareer was to look after the passengers on a ship.

Itwas arguedby the management regarding issue No. 1 that Ms. Ira Kareer is not a workman. In this respect thelearned counsel for the management drew my attention tothe definition of the workman. In 2( 8) the workmanhas been defined it is admitted that is . Ira Kareer was stewardess . In Section 2(s) a person who is drawing more was Rs . 1600 is not a workman.

It was further submitted that Ms. Ira Kareer was absent for 3 years and so she has not led any evidence as such according to her own admission he was drawing a salary ofRs . 30,000 as such in the definition of 2 ( s) and she is not a supervisor.

Inview of the definition of the workman Ms. Ira Kareer is not a workman. This issue is decided innegative.

So, faras the next issue is concerned the reference is not competent and bad in law as Ms. Ira Kareer was not aworkman and she is not entitled to refer the case under the Industrial Disputes Act. This issue is also decided in negative.

Hence the two issues framed are decided innegative and Ms. Ira Kareer is not entitled to get any releif asked for.

1439

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

मई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 783.-औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक आफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अभिकरण/श्रণ न्यायालय नं.- II नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/97-) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल.- 12012/297/95 -आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 783. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/97) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofBank ofBaroda and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 1-3-2004.

[No. L-12012/297/95 -IR(B-II)] CGANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEWDELHI

I.D. No. 5/97 PresidingOfficer: R.N. Rai

In the matter of :-

Shri ChoteyLal

VERSUS

Bank of Baroda

The learned counsel for the management argued that section 17 and 17 (A) and 20 of the ID Act the proceeding shall still deemed to be pending and the Award given on 9-2-2004 can be recalled as it has not become final under section 17 and 17(A) and 20 of the IDAct.

Hence the two issues framed are decided against theworkman and such the workman is not entitled to any reliefasked for and the Award of 9-2-2004 is liable tobe set aside in view of the findings of the two issue.

In view of the above Ms. Ira Kareer is not entitled toget any reliefand the Award dated 9-2-2004 is cancelled. The point referred to is replied thus:

The action ofthe management of the BritishAirways New Delhi is terminating the services ofMs. Ira Kareer Ex-Air Stewardess w.e.f. 3-10-98 is justified and legal . She isnot entitled to any releif claimed for . The Award dated 9-2-2004 need not be published. Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 25-2-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer TheMinistry ofLabour by its letter dt. 3-1-1997has referredthe following point for adjudication. The point runs ashereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, Shahjahanpur in terminating the services of Shri Chotey lal, Poon w.e.f. 14-11-1994 is just and legal. If not, to what relief the workman is entitledto" .

The workman nas submitted the statement of claim. Inhis statement of claim, he has stated that he workedas apeon initiallyat Rajanpur Branch ofthe bank under is Shahjahanpur Regional w.e.f. 10-6-1991 .He worked their till24-8-1991. His services were abruptly terminatedby away of oral orders for the Branch Manager without any prior notice and without giving any reason. Though the post was ofa permanent in nature and continued to exit aftertermination of his services from 24-8-1991 .

1440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

It has further been stated that he was a full time peon but he was paid Rs . 20 per day by of wages and the wages were not paid for holidays and Sundays .

It has been further stated that the workman was appointed at Tilhar Branch to work as peon w.e.f. 14-10-1991 and he worked there till 14-11-1994 when again his services were terminated abruptly without any prior notice and he was paid @ 25 per day. It was raised to Rs . 30 and in 1992 , it was raised to Rs . 35 which is clear fromAnnexure W/ 1 .

Ithas been further stated that the management appointed another person . He has given certificate of employment exchange . He was kept on daily wages basis and he was paid lumpsum amount . The action of the management in terminating his services w.e.f. 14-11-1994 isunfair and illegal. By the nature of the duties of the workman, he could not be treated as a casual daily wage worker. He has performed his services for 240 days as such he should be given notice or he should be retrenched . Even a temporary employee according to Shastri Award engaged for indefinite period shall be entitled to one month's pay and allowances . These payments will be in addition to the payments already made . He has given chart from 14-10-1991 to 27-2-1993 . In 1993 , he worked for 60 days according to his own statement annexed with the statement of claim . In 1994, he worked for 90 days . Management has filed written statement. It has been stated that there was no employer and employee relationaship between the workman and the management. It has been stated in the written statement that he was appointed as daily wager. He was not appointed as permanent peon . There was no recruitment. He was not appointed on probation . "Employee " can claim permanent post only when he has been exployed on probation and has successfully completed the entire days of probation. During the period w.e.f. 5-1-1994 to 31-12-1994 , the workman has worked for 99 days has not worked for 240 days in 12 calendar months calculatedfrom 5-1-1994 to 31-12-1994 . Since he has not completed 240 days continuously, he was only a daily rated peon and until he completes 240 days continuously in a calendar year , his right to reinstatement does not arise.

The workman has filed rejoinder. He has repudiated the allegations for the written statement and he has said that he was a temporary employee but he was appointed against substantive vacancy. He has again submitted the account of his work.

Heard the sounc from both the parties and perused the documents and the record . The counsel for the workman argued that he has worked as a peon on permanent post and he should be absorbed . He has worked for 2102 days between November, 1993 to October, 1994 and 24 days in November, 1993 , 24 days in December, 1993 , 15 days in January, 11 days in April , 1994, 29 days in May, 1994, 14 days in June, 1994. However, on total

PART II-SBC. 3( ii)] calculation of the last calendar year, he has not worked for more than 90 or 99 days . Section 25(F) ofthe I.D. Act isattracted only when service of 240 days in one calendar year is completed . He has filed Photostat copy of paper regarding the payments made to him in which it has been mentioned that he was a daily wager and labour charges have been paid to him and again on two occasions , he was daily wager . So paper filed by the workman itself shows that he has received labour charges from the bank and3 to 4 times daily wages . The learned counsel for the workman drew my attention to FLR 566 , it has been held bythe Hon'ble AllahabadHigh Court that Section 25 (F) is attracted only when service of 240 days is completed. In that case, there should be retrenchment . In FLR 223 , it hasbeenheldby Hon'ble Delhi High Court that 240 days are to be completed then only Section 25 (F) will be attracted. In 2003 FLR, page 113. , it has been held that in case 240 days are completed then only 25 (F) will be attracted. In the instant case, the workman has not worked for 240 days in calendar year as such, he is not entitled to any relief and the question referred to for adjudication is tobe replied innegative.

The question referred to is replied as thus:-

The action of the management ofbank ofBaroda, regional Office Shahjahanpur in terminating the services of Shri Chotey Lal , peon w.e.f. 14-11-1994 is neither unjustified nor illegal. The workman is entiled to no relief asprayed for.

Dated: 23-2-2004

R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

का. आ. 784.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 89/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-03-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12012/100/2002- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 3rd March, 2004

S. O. 784.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 89/ 2002) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 01-03-2004 .

[No. L- 12012/ 100/2002- IR( B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

1441 भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27 , 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, CHENNAI

Friday, the 23rd January, 2004

PRESENT :

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer.

Industrial Dispute No. 89/2002

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of Sub - section ( i) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Canara Bank and their workman.

BETWEEN :

SriP. Mani :

I Party/Workman

AND

The Deputy General Manager : II Party Management

Canara Bank, Madurai

APPEARANCE :

Forthe Workman

:M/s . K. Kannan &

S.R. Kalyani . Advocates

For theManagement :Mr. T.R. Sathianathan, Advocate

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide NotificationOrder No. L. - 12012/ 100/2002- IR (B - II) dated 9-9-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement on Sri P. Mani is legal andjustified? Ifnot, what relief is he entitled? "

2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 89/2002 and notices were issued toboth the parties and both the parties entered appearance through theiradvocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations in the Claim Statement of the Petitioner are briefly as follows: -

credit transactions involving unauthorised/ improper debts to S.B. account of customers and the funds of the bank wereunauthorisedly and fraudulently taken away through S.B. account . Subsequently, a charge memo has been issued alleging that the Petitioner has unauthorisedly taken the S.B. ledger No. 66 from the branch premises and given it to Smt . M.G.Nirmala, Clerk while she was waiting in an auto rickshaw outside thereby aiding her to tamper with the official records andto commit fraud . Further, he has also colluded with Smt . M. G. Nirmala in making several bogus entries in S.B. ledger sheets and he has got passed cheques and tokens from Smt, M. G. Nirmala directly and collected money from cashier and given the money to Smt. M.G.Nirmala, though the customers of the respective accounts were present in the counter. He had abetted in committing the fraud in collusion with Smt. M.G.Nirmala forundue pecuniary gains. The Petitioner has not accepted the allegations and he denied the charges and he also alleged that the alleged confession statement obtained on 1.5.97, in a holidayby coercion and force and therefore, it is not valid in law. Only on the confession of Smt . M.G.Nirmala, the Petitioner has been suspended . Actually, he has not received any money from the cashier as alleged... against him . The Enquiry Officer without considering all these things has come to the wrong and imaginary conclusionthatthe Petitioner would have used the money whichwas involved in the alleged offence and he has given a finding that the charge has been proved against the Petitioner. The Disciplinary Authority has taken a wrong conclusionand imposed the punishment of dismissal from service. The Petitioner preferred a Revision before the Chairman andManaging Director and he has even though modified the order, he has also not considered the submissions made by the Petitioner. The order passed against the Petitioner is illegal and therefore , the same has to be set aside. The findings of the enquiry officer and also the order passed by the Disciplinary Authoritybasing onthe confessional statement obtained from the Petitioner on 1.5.97, which is a holiday, clearly proves that the management forced the Petitioner to make such a statement inorder to get statement as per the confessional statement ofSmt . M.G.Nirmala. The Disciplinary Authority and AppellateAuthority have not given due consideration to the submissions made by the Petitioner. Hence , he prays theTribunal to set aside the order ofcompulsory retireraent and to reinstate him in service .

The Petitioner was appointed as sub -staff in Canara Bank in the year 1971 and he was promoted as Daftry in the year 1975. While so , in the year 1997 the Petitioner was placed under suspension by the Deputy General Manager, Madurai Circle for the alleged misconducts committed at West Avani Moola Street branch , Madurai . The allegation is that one Smt. Nirmala, Clerk who was dealing with S.B. account section has wilfully and falsely opened an S.B. account in benami name and thereby has committed misappropriation ofbank funds for about six lakhs and for this act ofmisconduct, Smt. Nirmala and others and also Petitioner who was working in the same branch were placed under suspension. It is further alleged that the Petitioner alongwith other delinquent employees namely Smt . Nirmala and T.R. Sundaresan made transactions involving fictitious

4. As against this , the Respondent in the Counter Statement alleged that the Petitioner while working as a peoninWestAvani Moola Street branch ofthe Respondent/ Bank at Madurai during the year 1997 , had indulged in certain acts ofdefrauding the bank in collusion with late T.Sundaresan, Ex-Special Assistant and Smt . M.G.Nirmala, Ex-Clerk ofthe same branch and derived pecuniary gains and the acts so committed by him are so serious misconducts and the bank initiated disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner and as the explanation given by the.

826 G7/04-22 1442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)]

cashier andgiven the moneyto Smt. M.G.Nirmala , though the customers of the respective accounts were present in the counter . Thus he has abetted Smt . M.G.Nirmala for undue pecuniary gains and also committed acts of frauds against theBank .

7. In this case on behalf of the Petitioner, it is contended that the Petitioner worked as a daftry and the duties of Daftry are filing letters independently and other papers in the respective files as per the indication marked in that letters, secondly, simple binding of books /ledger press copying and thirdly assisting in issuing stationery and fourthly stocking under guidance of old records in a proper manner and rendering assistance in giving them out when required and fifthly, the whole process of sorting , arranging, numbering, tallying the number of vouchers and stitching them are the duties and responsibilities of the Daftry and any other work related to branch office as instructed by the Branch Manager, he will do. In this case , the Respondent/Bank alleged that he has taken the S.B. account ledger to outside the bank and helped Smt. MG Nirmala to make false entries in that ledger, but there is no direct or substantial evidence to prove this action that the Petitioner has taken out the ledger from bank outside the bank premises . Secondly, except the alleged confessional statement of the Petitioner , there is no other substantial evidence to prove that the Petitioner has colluded with Smt . M.G.Nirmala in defrauding the bank to the tune of Rs.8,00,000/- .

8. The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that even at the domestic enquiry the Petitioner has taken the stand that the confessional statement was obtained by coercion and undue influence by the bank officials and therefore, the Respondent/Bank has to establish this fact with substantial evidence , but on the other hand, except the interested version of the bank, there is no other evidence to prove this contention.

Petitioner was not satisfactory, the domestic enquiry was ordered and the domestic enquiry was conducted fully in conformity with the principles of natural justice and 14 documents were marked and 9 witnesses were examined in the domestic enquiry and the Enquiry Officer after considering all the relevant materials , found the Petitioner guilty of having committed the misconducts levelled against him and on considering the findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Disciplinary Authority agreed with the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer and accorded personal hearing and proposed the punishment of dismissal . The Disciplinary Authority after consideration of the gravity of the misconducts and other relevant circumstances, imposed the punishment of dismissal on him . The Appellate Authority on considering the submissions made by the Petitioner in personal hearing and on purely humanitarian basis modified the order of dismissal to that of compulsory retirement . The Petitioner in collusion with Smt . M.G.Nirmala and in connivance with late T.Sundaresan had misappropriated to the tune of Rs . 8,00,000/- of bank's moncy. The confession statement was given by the Petitioner to the investigating officer at the branch in the presence of branch personnel and local union leaders and he has categorically admitted having taken the ledger No. 66 outside the branch premises for five minutes and handed over the same to Smt . M.G.Nirmala who was waiting in auto rickshaw. Further, the Petitioner has not established that his confessional statement was obtained under compulsion and coercion in the departmental enquiry and it was taken by the Petitioner before this Tribunal only as anafterthought . The Petitioner has signed the confessional statement in consultation with the local union leaders with whom he had reposed confidence, and in their presence onlyhe had given this statement. The Disciplinary Authority imposed the punishment of dismissal only after taking into consideration the entire records , findings and submissions of the Petitioner. Hence , the Respondent prays that the claim of the Petitioner may be dismissed with costs .

5. The points for my determination in these circumstances are-

(i) "Whether the action of the management of Respondent/Bank in imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement on the Petitioner is legal andjustified?"

(ii) " To what relief the Petitioner is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :-

6. The charge against the Petitioner in this case is, he hás unauthorisedly taken out the S.B. account ledger No. 66 from the branch premises and given it to Smt . M.G.Nirmala, a clerk while she was waiting in an auto rickshaw thereby aiding her to tamper with the bank records and to commit fraud; secondly he has colluded with Smt . M.G. Nirmala in making several bogus entries in S.B. ledger sheets and he has got passed cheques and tokens from Smt. M. G. Nirmala directly and collected money from the

9. But, on the other hand, it is argued by the Respondent thatthe investigating officer has obtained the confessional statement of the Petitioner and also Smt . M. G. Nirmala in thepresence of officials from Regional Office and also the local union leaders and the confession statement was obtained on 1.5.97 and the enquiry was started in 1999. It is more than two years after obtaining the confession statement, the Petitioner, only as an afterthought, has suggested that this confession statement was obtained by undue influence and coercion and in case of coercion and undne influence , initial burden lies upon the person, who alleged the same . But in this case , though the Petitioner has alleged that the confessional statement was obtained from him by coercion and undue influence , there is not even an iota of evidence to substantiate this contention of the Petitioner except the bald allegation that it'was obtained by coercion , there is no material to prove that this confessional statement was obtained from the Petitioner by coercion. On the other hand, the local union leaders 1443 [ भगि II- खण्ड 3 (it) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

been given by the Smt. M.G. Nirmala cannot be relied on by the domestic authorities . On the other hand , tham of Enquiry Officer has based his finding only on the bus confession statement of the Pentioner and also the salde Smt . M.G.Nirmala and therefore , no rendice can be 1000 placed on the findings of the Enquiry Officer and also the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority venuitit id who have witnessed the confessional statement who have attested the confessional statement have given an evidence that it was obtained voluntarily and only after confirmation from the Petitioner, they have signed in the confession statement .Mr. S. Marinmutho, who has been examined asa witness in domestic enquiry as MW3 has categorically stated that he has signed in the confession statement only after obtaining the eoneurrence of the Petitioner and the Petitioner has given this statement voluntarily. The confessional statement of the Petitioner was marked as Ex.ME8 and in that he has clearly admitted that he has taken out the 5.8 : noorint ledger from the office and handed over the sashe to Sint . M.G.Nirmala and he has also further admitted that it is a mistake ott his part. Similarly, he has also admitted that Smt . M.G.Nirmala has passed several cheques and given tokens to him and he himselfhas received the cash from the cashier and paid the amount to Smt . M.G.Nirmala. This fact was also admitted by the cashier Mr. S. Jayasekaran, who wasexamined as sixthwitness in the domestic enquiry and also Mr. Rajagopal, worked as cashier for a shortort time in the Respondent/Bank Avani Moola Street branch at Madurai and it is the evidence of Mr. Jayasekaran that normally he will note down in a piece of paper about the staff who has received the attuant but some times, when no paper or scribbling sheet is available, he might have noted in Shroff book also and it will show that the amount will be received by which staff member of thebank and shroffbook which is marked as ME 11, wherein it is mentioned that certain amounts have been receivedby the Petitioner anditwas noted by the said person in that shroff Book.

11. Though I find some force in this contentiomunicad on going through the evidence of witnesses in this case and on going through the documents filed in domestic enquiry. I find there is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner because the investigation officer namely Mr. Narayanan was examined in the domestic enquiry and he has given a clear evidence that Smt . M.G.Nirmala has Biyen A voluntary statement and also accompanied the Senior Manager to his servant maid's residence and from the vi residence of servant maid, they have seized the books and records of the Respondent Bank and he has also categorically stated that the confessionconfession statement li Mof the Petitioner was obtainedobtained in the presence of the mion local union leaders and only on confirmation from the Petitioner, the local union leaders have signed in th confession statement and in such circuftistances in cannot be said that the confession statement of the w Petitioner and also Smt. M.G. Nirmala canfior be looked into hai no substance. Purther, in this case the other person Mr. Rajagopal , who has worked asCashier for usi short period has clearly stated that he reised to give the money to the Petitioner without his signature in thie back side of the cheque and thereafter he has moped approached subsequently Therefore, fromtheit no documentary evidence and also from the oral evidence given by the witnesses in the domestic enquiry, ibisomi clearly established that the Petitioner in collusion withiю по Smt .M.G. Nirmala has misappropriated the amounts of na bank and he has taken out the ledger from the branch office to suit the convenience of Smt. M.G. Nirmala to make false entries in the ledger. Therefore, have no hesitation to come to a conclusion that the changes framed against the Petitioner have been clearly proved IM in the domestic enquiry

12. Then the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that the past record of the Petitioner has not been considered by the Disciplinary Authority and the punishment given by the Disciplinary Authority and the modified punishment given by the Appellate Authority is harsh. He further argued that under section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , this Tribunal has got every power to mould the relief as claimed by thePetitioner and in such circumstances , he prays that a lesser punishment may be awarded to the Petitioner.

13. But, I find no substance in the contention of the learned counsel forthe Petitioner that in the past conduct of the Petitioner namely Sri P. Mani he has not 10. As against this, the counsel for the Petitioner argued that as per rule , the cashier must take the signature ofthe staff on the back side of the cheque in such a situation and in no case, it was proved that the signature of the Petitioner was obtained on the back side of the cheque and it was also admitted by the cashier that he has not obtained the signature of the Petitioner in any one of the cheques presented by him . Under süch circumstances , it cannot be said that the Petitioner has received the money from the cashier directly and paid the amount to Smt. M.G.Nirmala . Further, though the bank has alleged the collusion between Smt . 104 M.G.Nirmala and the Petitioner, it was not established by any satisfactory evidence and therefore, the findings of the Enquiry Officer and also the findings of the Disciplinary Authority were not based on any substantial evidence and therefore , the same are required to be set aside by this Tribunal . It is his further contention that though the allegation was made against Smt . M.G.Nirmala and the Petitioner that they have colluded with another Special Assistant, the said Smt . M.G.Nirmala has not been examined in the domestic enquiry and no explanation was offered for non- examination of Smt. M. G. Nirmala and in such circumstances, the confessional statement said to have

826G1/04-23 1444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

been suffered with any penalty earlier, the order of compulsory retirement should not have been passed and I think a reference to the past record of service in Bipartite Settlement is not meant to drop any effective order of termination passed as a consequence of gross misconducts , which have been proved. Further , the Petitioner was an employee in the bank, where the confidence of customer is paramount for the success of business cannot be disputed . The effect of continuation of the employment of such person who had failed to rejoin and inspire the confidence of the employer was also evi t . The risk to the bank in employing a person ke the ' etitioner / workman who had patently duped customer , and harmed the bank's reputation was also evident . The gross misconduct committed by the workman had been proved after due enquiry, in which the workman had fully participated . Under such circumstances , I find there is no substance in the contention of the Petitioner that provision of section 11A of the Act is to be invoked by this Tribunal in these circumstances of the case. Therefore , I find this point against the Petitioner.

Point No. 2 :-

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

14. In view of my foregoing findings , the Petitioner Sri P. Mani is not entitled to any relief, as claimed by him. No Costs .

15. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court onthis day the 23rd January , 2004)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :-

On either side

: None

Documents Marked:-

Forthe I Party/Workman : Nil For the II Party/Management :-

Ex. No. Date

Description

30-05-97

M1 Xerox copy of the letter from the Branch Manager to Investigating officer

M2 30-04-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Smt. M.G. Nirmala to SeniorManager of Respondent/Bank

30-5-97

M3 Xerox copy of the letterfrom P. Dhanabalan to Investigating officer

30-05-97

M4 Xerox copy of the letter from Marimuthu to Investigating Officer

30-05-97

M5 Xerox copy of the letter from Ravindran to Investigating Officer

[PA

Ex. No. Date

Description

M6 16-07-97 Xerox copy of report ofMr. Naa D.A. Cell, Circle Once.

M7 01-05-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Smt. M.G. Nirmalato Investigating Officer.

M8 01-05-97 Xerox copy of the letter from the Petitioner to Investigating Officer. 30-05-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Mr. Rajagopal to Investigating Officer.

M10 Nil

Extract of shroffbook .

M11 30-05-97 Xerox copy of the letter from Mr.Jayasekaran to Investigating Officer

M12 30-05-97 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Mr. Vittialaganto InvestigatingOfficer.

M13 23-05-97 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Senior Managerto Deputy General ManagerCircleOffice,Madurai.

M14 02-05-97 Xeroxcopyofthe letter from Senior Manager to Commissioner of police,Madurai

M15 25-09-98 Xerox copy of the charge memo issued to Petitioner

M16 09-11-98 Xerox copy of the explanation givenby Petitioner to the Charge Memo

M17 Nil

Xerox copy of the enquiry proceedings

M18 Nil

Xerox copy ofthe written brieffiled byPresentingOfficer

M19 10-03-99 Xerox copy of the defence statement filed on behalf of Petitioner

M20 03-05-99 Xerox copy of the findings of EnquiryOfficer

M21 03-03-2000 Xerox copy of the proceedings of Disciplinary Authority

M22 20-03-2000 Xerox copy of the communication from Respondent to Petitioner

M23 28-03-2000 Xerox copy of the proceedings of personal hearing

M24 28-03-2000 Xerox copy of the proceedings of Disciplinary Authority

M25 02-05-2000 Xerox copy of the appeal preferred by Petitioner

M26 09-11-2000 Xerox copy of the order of Appellate Authority [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1445 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च , 2004

को. आ. 785.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण केन्द्रीय कार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 659/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/263/98- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

Principal Labour Court , Chennai for adjudication. The Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court has taken the same on its file as I.D.No.243/ 99 and after the constitution of this Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , the said industrial dispute was transferred to this Tribunal and after getting the same , it was numbered as I.D.No.659/ 2001. The Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court issued notices to both sides and both sides entered appearance through the authorised representative and advocate respectively and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2004

2.The dispute referred by the Govt . in the Schedule ishereunder:- i

"Whether the management of the Indian Bank is justified in denying permanent full time scale wages to Sri D. Balaguru, permanent part-time sweeper and if not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? " :

3. The allegations made in the Claim Statement of the Petitioner Union are as follows :-

S. O. 785. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 659/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 01-03-2004.

[No. L- 12012/263/ 98 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENΝΑΙ

Tuesday, the 27th January, 2004

PRESENT :

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 659/2001 (Tamil Nadu Principal Labour Court CGID. No. 243/99)

(Inthe matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause

(d) ofsub-section ( 1) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between theManagement of Indian Bank and their workmen)

BETWEEN :

:I Party/Claimant

TheGeneral Secretary, IndianBank Employees Union

AND

: II Party/Management

The Zonal Manager, IndianBank, Chennai .

APPEARANCE :

For the Claimant :Mr. K. J. Arunachalam, Authorised Representative

For theManagement : M/ s. Aiyar & Dolia, R.Arumugam,

&N. Krishnakumar, Advocates AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification No.L - 12012/263 /98 /IR (B - II) dated 20-04-1999 has earlier referred this industrial dispute to Tamil Nadu

Sri E. Balaguru , who is espoused by Petitioner Union, was appointed by the Respondent/Management as sweeper/ scavenger in the year 1983 being sponsored byEmployment Exchange . In that year , the Respondent/ Management empanelled eight persons in which Sri E, Balaguru was the seventh person in the panel . The said eight persons were engaged in permanent identified vacancies of sweepers at the maintenance department of the central office of the -Respondent /Bank and were engaged from 31-10-83 . Thus the concerned employees have worked more than 594 days upto 10-3-86. There is a subsisting settlement between the Union and the Respondent/Management under section 18 (3 ) read with 2(p) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 entered into on 28-7-93 under the caption ofcareer path which deals with about the filling up of sweeper vacancies at the central officeandbranches . This settlement is with regard to the wages for the sweepers in various offices of the bank. If the resultant vacancy is ¼ scale vacancy, the management would declare the vacancy and call for applications from the sweeper employees drawing ½ scales wages and the vacancies wouldbe filled in from the applicants . While so, when the eight vacancies in full time scale sweepers/ scavengers arose at maintenance department of central office of the Respondent/Bank, the management as per the provisions of the above settlement called for options from the permanent part time sweeper, employees drawing 4th scale wages and working in branches situated at Chennai and only two employees gave their option for full time sweepers in maintenance department of the central office. They are one Mr. Krishnamurthi and Mr. K. Nagalingam. The balance of six vacancies were filled up with appointing the first six temporary sweepers at Serial Nos. (a) to (f) sponsored through Employment Exchange as full time sweepers/scavengers at the maintenance 1446

[PART II SBC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

department of the central office of the Respondent/ Management . Remaining two temporary sweepers namely Mr. Balaguru , the concerned employee and Mr. Alex Devadoss were absorbed as permanent part time employees in 4th scale wages in the vacancies created at Thiruveteeswaranpet branch . Thus , the Petitioner was engaged in ³½th scale ofpay in Thiruveteeswaranpet branch of the Respondent/Bank. Further, there is a subsisting settlement between the Federation of the Indian Bank Employees Union and the management called Intra -Cadre Posting, dealing about the posting of full time sweepers/ scavengers , who had put in five years of service will be posted as a sub- staff in the branch of the Respondent/ Bank. As per the above settlement, six persons have opted tobe posted as sub - staff after having acquired the requisite eligibility and their requests were favourably considered and posted in the branches of Chennai city. From that date onwards , the concerned employee has been representing the Central Office management of the Respondent/Bank to absorb him in the full scale vacancy that was available at the maintenance department with his representations in the year 1987, 1989 and 1990. In the meantime , the Respondent/Bank have called for list of employees from the Employment Exchange in the year 1991 to create a panel of temporary employees to be utilised in the vacancies created by intra -cadre posting . When there is a subsisting settlement under section 18 (1 ) with the recognised union in the matter of filling up of sweeper vacancies under the caption career path , the central office management of the Respondent/Bank totally disregarding the said settlement and totally against the interest ofthe employee in dispute had entered into a settlement with a minority union in the bank in appointment of eight temporary sweeper employees who are much juniors to employee concerned under this dispute. It is also further alleged that the action of the Respondent/Management is illegal , unjust and colourable exercise ofpower. Hence the Petitioner Union prays that an award may be passed to the relief of full time employee in the service of the Respondent/Bank to the concerned employee with all consequential and attendant benefits from the date his junior employees as full time sweepers in the maintenance department. :

into the services in 3/4 scale wages and he has also accepted the offer and joined in the bank. Therefore , the concerned employee has no legal right for applying sub- staff conversion while working in 3/4 scale wages . No doubt those sweepers who have completed a minimum period of five years in full scale wages and satisfy the eligibility norms and applied for such conversion. The Petitioner was working in 3/4 scale wages in not entitled toclaim, full scale wages . Since the concerned employee accepted the terms and conditions of appointment order and joined duty there , it is not open to seek any relief regarding full scale wages . It is also true that with a view toprovide progress in the career ofpermanent part time sweepers who during their course of service in the bank are fixed in five scales namely consolidated, 1/3 , 1/4, 3/4, and full scale wages of sub -staff cadre depending upon the area swept by them, a settlement under section 18(1) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was arrived at on 28-7-93 . No doubt, it is true that full scale wages vacancies during 1988 and 1990 were filled on compassionate grounds as per the Govt. guidelines on such appointments due to death of sub - staff. Subsequent to the posting sub- staff by wayofintra-cadre posting, another eight persons were engaged as casual sweepers at Head Office on need based situations and on rotation. Subsequently, the Indian. Bank Association raised an industrial dispute for regularisation of services of those second set of eight casual labourers in appropriate scale wages and the bank entered into a settlement with the Association under section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 /on 12-10-93 for the above said eight persons and the Respondent/bank has got every right to enter into the settlement with the association and therefore , the Petitioner Union cannot question the same. Subsequently, Thriuveteewaranpet branch in which the concerned employee Sri Balagaru was working got merged with Triplicane branch as such there was no vacancy at Triplicane branch and therefore, Sri E. Balaguru was posted toRoyapuram branch and he was working in that branch since 21-8-200 . Further, he was posted in Royapuram branch and his wages also were protected in accordance with rules and settlement stated above. Even the Apex Court andHigh Courts held that once a person absorbed and accepted the terris and conditions at the time of consideration oftheir case , they cannot seek reopening it for the purpose of absorption in the posts of higher scale. Therefore, Sri Balaguru , the concerned employee is not entitled to stake claim for full scale wages and the action of the management in retaining him in 3/4 scale wages is valid and justified . Hence , it is prayed that the claim may... be dismissed with costs...

5. As against this the Petitioner Union has filed rejoinder, wherein the Union stresses its contention made in Claim Statement and also stated that the Petitioner was engaged not to meet the exigences of sweeper vacancy at Head Office and had the Respondent /Management 4. As against this , the Respondent/Management in its Counter Statement contended that it is true that concerned employee , whose cause is espoused by Petitioner union , was engaged as a temporary sweeperby the order ofRespondent on 10-3-83 and in eight vacancies that arose later at Head Office, the Respondent absorbed six persons in the order of preference in the list dated 10-3-86 and for the remaining two vacancies , those casual sweepers who were already drawing 3/4 scales wages at Respondent/Bank at Tiruveteeswaranpet branch under the Regional Office of Chennai (South) were absorbed. Only two persons , one among them' was Mr. E.Balaguru, the concerned employee was given the offer of absorption [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

appointed the concerned workman in this dispute in a permanent full was sweeper post , when he should have been legitimately entitled to, he would have also become a sub - staff in terms of intra-cadre posting along with other six persons who have empanelled along with him as temporary sweeper/scavenger. Though the concerned employee has accepted the appointment order and joined the post mentioned in the appointment order, any policy or settlement arrive at governing the interest of the such sweeper employees provide them inherent right to claim their legitimate elevation and further he has legal remedy to seek justice when his legitimate entitled dues are denied and discriminated. Further , when the claim for this concerned workman is pending resolution , the Respondent/Management has made Mr. Alex Devadoss , who was empanelled along with the workman in the dispute and the next junior in the order of seniority of empanelment as full time sweeper and this act of the management is illegal and discriminatory. The temporary sweepers who were for much juniors were made full time sweepers in total contravention to the legally binding settlement and also deprived the concerned workman his legitimate posting. Hence , the Petitioner Union prays that an award may be passed in favour of the concerned employee .

6. In these circumstances , the points for determination in this case are as follows:-

(1) "Whether the management of Respondent/ Bank is justified in denying the permanent full scale wages to Sri D. Balaguru, permanent part time sweeper? "

(ii) "To what relief, the concerned employee is entitled?"

Point No. 1 :-

7. In this case , it is admitted that the concerned employce Mr. D. Balaguru has been empanelled as a temporary sweeper and subsequently, he has been made permanent . During 1986 , 8 vacancies in the post of sweepers /scavengers in permanent full time scale arose in the Respondent/Management due to intra-cadre posting of swecpers/ scavengers employees at the department as sub - staff cadre employees and the Respondent/ Management invited applications from the existing permanent part - time sweeper employees drawing 3/4th scale wages working in the branches situated in Chennai city and accordingly, only two permanent part time sweepers drawing 3/ 4th scale wages working at Thiruveteeswaranpet branch and in Regional Office, South branch responded the call . Hence , out of the eight permanent full time sweeper vacancies that arose in office maintenance department at the Head Office ofRespondent/ Bank . the above two permanent part time sweepers were posted to full time sweepers posts and remaining six vacancies temporary sweeper employees , empanelled along with the concerned employee on 31-10-83 were absorbed as permanent full time sweepers in the office 826 GI/04-24

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र7, 1926

1447 maintenance department in accordance with seniority of empanelment leaving the concerned employee and the another man . It is also admitted that on 27-12-82 an understanding was reached with regard to filling up the sweeper vacancies in scale wages inclusive of full time sweepers , who have been put into practice and thus bécome legally enforceable terms and conditions of service. Thus, it is admitted that vacancies of full scale wages of permanent sweepers arose at Head Office in 1987 , 1988 and 1990 and it is also admitted that the Respondent/Bank itself called for applications from the eligible candidates for applying the posts and the concerned employee Sri D. Balaguru has also applied for the post on each and every occasion. While so , the Respondent/Bank have not filled up the said vacancies from the eligible part time 3/4th scale wages employees , has called for fresh persons from the Employment Exchange leaving out the existing senior part time sweepers who are eligible for higher scale wages in lurch and thus, empanelled the temporary employees who were much juniors to the workman in the dispute namely Sri D. Balaguru . While so, the Respondent /Management while denying and depriving the concerned workman Sri D. Balaguru his legally and legitimately entitled posting of full time sweeper post has further entered into a settlement with minority union to absorb temporary sweepers who have been empanelled in 1991 and who are much juniors to concerned employee.

8. In this case, on the side of the Petitioner, the concerned employee was examined as WWI and on his side Ex . WI to W19 were marked. As against this , on the side ofthe Respondent one Mr. Subramanian was examined asMWI and Ex . Ml to M4 were marked.

9. On behalf of the Respondent, it was contended that it is no doubt true that eight casual sweepers were engaged on need based situations and on rotation were called for from the Employment Exchange and appointed as Casual Labourers. But during 1991 for regularisation of the service of those second set of Casual Sweepers, the Indian Bank Employees Association has raised a dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) and the Respondent/Bank has entered into a settlement with the said association under Section 12 ( 3 ) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 on 12-10-93 . The settlement was confined to sweepers working in Head Office alone and they were represented by the association which signed the settlement and it is false to say that the concerned employee and another man were excluded by the employees association because even prior to that date i.e. even in 1990 the concerned employee has joined the Petitioner Union and therefore , neither the Petitioner Union nor the concerned employee can question the settlement under section 12 (3 ) of the Act and further on behalf on the concerned employee the Petitioner Union has raised this dispute after 11 years i.e. only in 1997 and therefore, it 1448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) ] is a belated one and it cannot be questioned by raising the dispute.

PARVEX AND DIRECTOR GENERAL, CSIRin 2002 IILLJ 826 and therefore , the Petitioner Union cannot raise this dispute after a long lapse oftime.

12. In these circumstances , the main dispute is only because Sri D.Balaguru , whose cause the Petitioner Umion is espousing , has come to this forum after a long lapse of timecannot question the acts ofthe management andwhile the concerned employee was working in 3 / 4th scale wages inthe Respondent/Management, whether the management cancall fortemporary employees in the year 1991 and can be entered into a settlement with the minority union for regularisation of the persons who were much juniors than the concerned employee .

( 10. But , on behalf of the Petitioner Union, it is contended that this act of management of has totally deprived the legitimate claim of the concerned employee Sri D. Balaguru for being elevated to full time sweeper's post. It is further argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in order to relieve the hardship caused to the part -time sweeper since they were kept as part- time sweepers, the Unionhas entered into a settlement under the original of Ex . W13 and this legally binding settlement was entered into on 28-7-93 and in terms of the provisions of the said settlement also the concerned workman Sri D. Balaguru should have been elevated as permanent full time permanent sweeper . Further even during the years 1987, 1988 and 1990 there were vacancies in the permanent part tirne sweepers post and the bank has also called for applications from the eligible candidates for applying the post. Instead of filling up the said post with eligible candidates and allowed the post to be unfilled without any reason has called for and empanelled another set of temporary employees in which far much juniors to the concerned employee were appointed and subsequently, they have been absorbed as permanent full time sweepers by the management , which is discriminatory and it is illegal. Further, though it is contended that a settlement has been entered into between the management and Employees Association, this act of management has resulted in total deprivation ofthe entitlement of concerned employee for being elevated to the full time sweeper post .

13. In this case, on behalf of the Petitioner, it is contended that even in the year 1987 , 1988 and 1990 there werevacancies in the Respondent/Bank in the post of full scale wages of permanent sweepers , the Respondent/ Bank without filling up the said vacant posts from the eligible candidates and allowed the posts to be unfilled and without any reason have called for another set of temporary employees and appointed them as permanent fulltime sweepers is illegal and it is in violation of legally binding settlement and also amounts to unfair labour practice. Further, on behalf of the Petitioner, it is argued that the Supreme Court in 1982 1 LLJ 33 in regard to promotions, has held that " the Tribunal should not think be so powerless, the industrial tribunal intended to adjudicate the industrial disputes between the management and workmen, settle them and pass effective awards in such a way that industrial peace between the employers and employees can be maintained, so that there can bemore production to benefit all concerned.... Further, it is held that " the Tribunal in the instant case in view ofits findings, first ofall should have declared that promotionswere illegal and unjustified, their promotion being the result of arbitrary action of the management which was nothing but unfair labour practice and the promotion in question should have been cancelled and the Tribunal in consultation with the management and the union should have framed norms/ rules of promotion and directed the Management to give promotion/upgradation in accordance with those norms/rules. " Thus , in this case, the concerned employee Sri D. Balaguru has been victimised by the Respondent/ Management by promoting his juniors as permanent full time sweepers who have been appointed long back to the concerned em- ployee's appointment and therefore , it is illegal and to be set aside .

11. But , as against this, the Respondent contended that the Petitioner Union has not raised this dispute with regard to Sri D. Balaguru at the time of entering into settlement with the Association and it is only an inter- party union rivalry, much later period, the Petitioner Union has raised this dispute on the allegation that juniors of the concerned employee Sri D. Balaguru have been made permanent as full time workers . Further, it is contended that even now many sweepers like the concerned employee who were senior to concerned employee are continuing in 3/4th scale wages and therefore , the concerned employee Sri D. Balaguru is not entitled to stake claim for full scale wages and the action of the Respondent/Management in retaining his in 3 / 4th wages is legal, valid and justified. It is also contended on behalf of the Respondent that Sri D. Balaguru had accepted the appointment in 3 /4th scale wages at Thiruveteeswaranpet branch in 1986 and the Petitioner Union has chosen to raise this dispute in this case only in the year 1997 as an after thought and after a lapse of eleven years . Therefore , a person once absorbed and accepted the terms and conditions at the time of consideration of their case, they cannot seek re - opening it for the purpose of absorption in post of higher scale and itwas also held by the Supreme Court in the case ofANIS

14. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner . In this case , it is clear that the persons who have been appointed subsequent to the appointment of the concerned employee namely Sri D. Balaguru have been admittedly made permanent and thus [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

the concerned employee has been deprived his rightful promotion. Even though on the side of the Respondent/ Management it is contended that neither the Petitioner Union nor the concerned employee ever challenged the settlement entered into with the Association by the Respondent/Management , I am not conceived that only after challenging the settlement, the concerned employee an question the promotion given to his juniors, who have oeen appointed as temporary employees in the year 1991 . Further, I am not convinced by the Respondent's arguments that even to -day many sweepers like the concerned employee who were senior to him are continuing in 3/4 scale wages and they were not made full time employees and they have not raised any dispute . If there are any sweepers like the concerned employee who are senior to the concerned employee are continuing , the Respondent/Management is to be blamed for the same because I find it amounts to unfair labour practice on the part of the Respondent/Management . It is unfair on the part of the Respondent/Management because while seniors are working in lower cadre , the juniors have been promoted and made as full time employees. Under such circumstances , I find the Petitioner is entitled to become full time employee in the sweeper cadre in the services of the Respondent/Bank from the date of his juniors were made will all conse quence and attendant benefits , In view of the above reasoning, I find this point in favour of the Petitioner Union.

Point No. 2

The nextpoint to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?

15. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned employee Sri Balaguru is entitled to the relief as full time sweeper in the services of the Respondent/Bank from the date of his juniors were promoted as full time sweepers in the maintenance department of the Respondent/Management will all consequential and attendant benefits . Ordered accordingly. No Costs .

16. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 27th January, 2004. )

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witness Examined :

Forthe 1 Party/Claimant : WW1 Sri E. Balaguru For the II Party/Management : MW Sri M. Subramanian Documents Marked :-

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1449 Forthe I Party/Claimant

Ex. No. Date Description

WI 27-10-83 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Management to con- cerned employee regarding selection.

W2 10-03-86 Xerox copy of the application given by the concerned employee For sub staffpost.

W3 10-03-86 Xerox copy of the offer of appoint- ment issued to concerned employee .

W4 21-3-86 Xerox copy of the joining report given byconcerned employee.

W5 17-09-86 Xerox copy of the particulars pertaining toconcerned employee sent by Zonal Office.

W6 31-10-86 Xerox copy of the confirmation order issued to concerned employee W7 14-09-87 Xerox copy of the circular issued by Respondent/Bank for filling up of permanent full time sweeper.

W8 Nil

Xerox copy of the representation for confirmation of Services in full scale wages given by the Petitioner .

W9 23-06-88 Xerox copy of the application submitted to Zonal Manager for full scale wages .

W10 02-07-90 Xerox copy of the application submitted to Zonal Manager by the concerned employee applying for full time sweeper vacancy W11 25-09-80 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Bank to Secretary General of Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union Regarding Intra cadre postings .

W12 28-09-80 Xerox copy of the letter from the Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union to Respondent/ Bank accepting Implementation of intra cadre posting.

W13 28-07-98 Xerox copy of the settlement under section 18 ( 1 ) in the matter of filling up of Part - time Sweeper .

W14 31-07-96 Xerox copy of the letter from Indian Bank Employees Union to Assist Labour Commissioner ( Central ) raising Industrial Dispute .

1450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] Ex. No. Date Description

Broda and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 01-03-2004.

W15 09-07-98 Xerox copy of the reply submitted by Respondent/Bank .

[No. L - 12012/325 /96 - IR(B.II)] W16 30-07-98

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

Xerox copy of the rejoinder filed by Petitioner Union .

ANNEXURE

W17 27-12-82 Xerox copy of the minutes of discussions held at Head Office of IndianBank .

W18 12-10-93 Xerox copy of the settlement with minority union under Section 12 (3 )

W19 12-12-97

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI LD . NO . 123 OF 1997

Xerox copy of the Internal correspondence of the Respondent/ Bank.

RAMKUMAR

Versus

For the II Party/Management :-

BANK OF BARODA

Ex. No. Date Description

AWARD

MI 18-11-80 Xerox copy of the circular issued by Respondent/Bank

Ministry of Labour by its letter dated 18-08-97 has sent the following points for adjudication to the tribunal.

M2 26-03-83

Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in terminating the services of Shri Ram Kumar w.e.f. 19-12-1995 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled ?

Xerox copy of the circular issued by Personnel Deptt . To all branches of Indian Bank regarding norms for engagement of permanent part -time sweepers and payment of wages

26-06-96

M3 Xerox copy of the letter issued by ReserveBank of India to the Chairman, IndianBank regarding Achievement of capital adequacy ratio of8 percent .

नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2004

का. आ. 786.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ोदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय न०2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 123/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01-3-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The workman /applicant workman in his statement of claim has stated that the applicant was appointed as 'Peon' on 13-11-1995 by the opposite party in his branch Bank ofBaroda, Haqiqat Nagar , Saharanpur through the Employment Exchange (Registration No.7691 /90 ) after due recruitment process vide their two recruitment letters No. 15/1289 dated 12.07.1995 and No. 15/2046 dated 10/18-10- 1995. That the workman was working very sincerelybut suddenly on 19-12-1995 the services of workman were illegally terminated without issue of show cause notice , notice pay and enquiry which is in violation of Article 311 (2) of the constitution of India , section 25 F of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 and natural justice . Since the workman is from schedule caste category, his illegal termi- nation of service is unfair labour practice by the opposite party and atrocite on schedule caste .

[सं. एल-12012/325/96- आई.आर. (बी-11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3rd March , 2004

S.O. 786.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 123/97 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , No. 2 New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Bank of

That the branch manager was not in favour of workman's appointment because on submitting all the required certificates with the opposite party on 28-10-1995. the opposite party issued instruction for the branch manager to appoint the workman as Peon but when the workman contacted the branch manager on 31-10-1995, he refused to take the workman . Hence, on 01-11-1995 the workman recontacted the opposite party , who once again issued instructions for the branch manager to take the workman as pcon and also passed the same instructions through the telephone. Still the branch manager had been sending back the workman upto 12-11-1995 and took him [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1451 on duty on 13-11-1995 . It is known that on illegally terminating the services of workman the branch manager has taken another favoured person on the post which is illegal.

he also stated here with pertinence in passing that the identified permanent strength in clerical and sub-staff cadre isdetermined by the management ofthe bank from timeto time on considerations such as size of the branch or office and volume of work etc.

That against the illegal termination of service several requests were made with the opposite party on 19-12-1995,20-12-1995 and 05-01-1996but the workman was not heard. That the services of workman were illegally terminated by a different person i.e. , the branch manager , whereas the appointing authority is the opposite party.

That on 13-02-1996 applicant moved an application before the conciliation officer/ Asstt . Labour Commissioner (Central ) Dehradun for the conciliation proceedings but due to negative and irresponsible attitude of the opposite party, it was a failure and the conciliation officer recom- mended the case to Govt . for reference .

Therefore, workman/applicant prays:

A. He may be reinstated with back wages .

B. He may be awarded any other relief as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and necessary.

Besides employing workman on permanent post/ba- sis as stated in the preceding para, the opposite party herein, like another employer, be it the central or any state government or in the private sector, is occasionally com- pelled to engage ' daily rated workers ' on adhoc casual temporary basis for copying with passing necessity/ contingeny, e.g. , contemplated recruitment process has not. been initiated or having been initiated has not been com- pleted within the stipulated period, or the newly appointed person has sought extension of time tojoin opposite party's service at the branch or office of his posting , or an existing permanent employee has gone on leave of absence or has not joined his duties on the expiry of leave originally granted or subsequently extended , or as pending of regularisation of daily wager as per the Govt. guidelines or a seasonal necessity has arisen , or on account of such other contingency.

ON MERITS

That the applicant has sent a copy of this statement to the opposite party vide AD receipt No. 4701 dt . 29-08-1997 (enclosed).

The opposite party in his written statement has stated that the opposite party herein being a bank is Govt. ofIndia's undertaking in public sector having a network of its branches and offices at various places. With the above objective of carrying on its banking business efficiently and for having an affective administrative supervision and control over its branches and offices, the opposite party has a hierarchical administrative set up as under :

Broadly, all employees in the bank are classified into two main categories or cadres and these are (a) ' non-work- man' i.e. managers , officers and supervisors and (b) ' work- man' , also called ' Award Staff ' , with in the meaning ofthe team defined U/s 2(s ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (briefly ID Act) . The workman or the Award Staff are also classified into ( i ) clerks and ( ii) sub -staff i.e. class IV staff such as peons , sweepers , farashers etc.

Para 1 ofthe statement of claim is wrong and denied It is specifically denied that there was any appointment as peon as alleged. In this regard it is submitted that a requi- sition dated 13-03-1995 was sent to the employment Exchange , Saharanpur for giving details of the persons as per the requirement . The requirement No. 9 had clearly stated that the tenure of temporary appointment will beless than three months . It is quite clear that in no case the appointment could cross the period of three months and in fact it was for one month only which has clearly reflected as per the facts of the present case . It is a fact that the present application is not a workman at all or otherwise also the present proceedings have not support from law for its continuation before this Tribunal . In response to the requisition vide its letter dated 05-04-1995 it had clearly beenconfirmed and in fact the name of the present appli- cant was sent for ' daily wage' peon. It is specificallyde- nied that there was any process leave alone the alleged due recruitment process was followed . It is quite clear that the name of the applicant was referredby the employment exchange for a particular purpose . In any case employment exchange as per its procedure does intimate the concerned candidates with regard to the availability of some opportu- nity. The present applicant has deliberately and with obvi- ous motives has with held that particular intimation letter In the case of recruitment of sub- staff or class IV employees the opposite party, being as establishment in public sector, notifies all substantive vacancies to employ- ment exchanges in compliance of provisions of employ- ment exchanges Act, save and to the extent exemption is granted by the government's appropriate authorities or the DCET. The candidates who are sponsored by the employment exchange (s) are interviewed by the opposite party's own selection committees and those candidates who are eligible and are adjudged suitable , are appointed and confirmed after completion of their probation period. Sub -staff is also appointed by Regional Managers with the concurrence and approval of Zonal Managers . It may

Para2 ofthe statement ofclaim is wrong and denied. It isspecifically denied that the services of the applicant wereterminated. In fact the applicant wasjust a dailywage peon and such the question of termination or sudden ter- mination as alleged does not arise at all . In view of the facts ofthe case it is quite clear that no question of termination 1452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 27 , 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

the employment exchange hence it was not under any occasional compulsion, the bank has no right to exploit the poor labour and victimise them through unfair labour prac- tice . Applicant belongs to S.C, Category and the appoint- ment was done against the reservation.

or show cause notice could arise leave alone notice pay or enquiry as alleged . The provisions of law as cited has no application to the present case . It is also specifically denied that there is any question of termination leave alone illegal termination . It is also denied that there is any unfair labour practice or atrocity as alleged.

ON MERITS

Para 3 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied It is specifically denied that there could have been any question any question of favour as alleged . It is absolutely wrong on the part of applicant to allege that nay instruc- tions were issued. It is specifically denied that there was any question of illegal termination or keeping another favoured person as alleged . It is a fact that the application was taken as daily wage peon and he was already aware of the same . Hence at this application cannot belie the records.

That the contents of the para No. 1 are not admitted. The content of para 1 of the statement of claim are reiter- ated. The documents filed by the opposite party are forged. The alleged requisition dated 13-03-1995 and letter dated 05-04-1995 of the employment exchange are not connected letters , the employment exchange never intimated that the appointment was for one month only. Such a long proce- dure ofappointment was for one month only. Such a long procedure of appointment followed by the Bank , was it mere eye wash and waste of Govt.'s money and deliberate harassment of the schedule caste candidates .

Para 4 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied. It is denied that there was any request as alleged. In any case the application has already been paid as per law.

That the contents of the para No. 2 of written state- ment are not admitted, The contents of para 2 of the state- ment of claim are reiterated.

Para 5 of the statement of claim is wrong and denied It is specifically denied that the opposite party had ever appointed the applicant hence the question of termination also did not arise.

That the contents of the para No. 3 of written state- ment are not admitted . The contents of para 3 of the state- ment of claim are reiterated. Applicant was appointed on permanent basis .

Thatthe contents of the para No. 4,5,6 and 7 of writ- ten statement are not admitted . Para Nos . 4,5,6 , and 7 of statement of claim are reiterated.

That the prayer of opposite party is not admitted the prayer of applicant in his statement of claim is reiter- ated.

Para6 ofthe statement of claim is wrong and denied. It is admitted that there had been proceedings before the AL.C, however, there is no question of positive or negative attitude by the opposite party as alleged rather the recom- mendation is without any support from law for the applicant who was on purely adhoc daily wage basis for a period of one inonth only.

That Sh. G. K. Garg is not the duly authorized signa- tory of the opposite party. Sh. Narain Singh Khanna, Asstt . General Manager of the Bank cannot subdelegate the powers . Moreover , the said power of Attorney is not duly registered.

Para "" of the statement of claim is wrong and denied. Considering the facts of the case at least the applicant has no support from law to show his entitlement in any manner for any kind of reinstatement or wages as alleged . The hon'ble Tribunal would kindly appreciate that the reliefs prayed have been invalidated in various prono- uncement .

Therefore it is prayed that workman/ applicant may be reinstated with back wages as he is unemployed throughout.

' In view of the above submissions it is, therefore , prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to:

Heard the Arguments from both the sides and pe- rused the records .

(i) reject the claim in toto;

(ii) cost throughout the proceedings may also be granted in favour of the opposite party and against the applicant,

(iii) any other and such further orders which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper be passed against the applicant and in favour of the opposite party.

Inrejcinder the applicant has stated that there is no need to cominent on paras 1 and 2 of the written statement .

Workmanhas filed the written argument. In written argument he has taken a plea of article 311 (2) constitution inIndia. hehas cited 19 FLR 747 99 (83 ) FLR Page 1118, 2002 ( 13 ) FLR Page 1081 2000 , ( 87) FLR Page 248. I have gone through citation of Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble Apex Court . The management has also filedwrit- ten argument . I have gone through the written argument from the management and heard the counsel for the man- agement.

That the contents of paras No.3 , 4, and 5 of written statement are not admitted . But in para No.4, opposite party has admitted selection of candidates through the process of due recruitment as was adopted in the case of the applicant . Applicant's appointment was done through

Itwas argued from the side of the workman that he wasappointed on 13-11-1995 and his post was of a perma- nent nature. He could not be removed without prier notice andpayment for ofcompensation. His services were termi- nated on 19-12-1995 . It shows that he worked in a bank [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 27, 2004/चैत्र 7, 1926

1453

(1983का 32 ) की धारा-3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्रम मंत्रालय में केन्द्रीय सचिवालय सेवा संवर्ग के अनुभाग अधिकारी, श्री पी. सी. भारद्वाज को 24 फरवरी, 2004 ( पूर्वाहन) से उत्प्रवास संरक्षी, चंडीगढ़ के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[संख्या एस-13011/1/2003 - उत्प्रवास ]

अशोली चलाई, अवर सचिव

(EmigrationDivision)

from 13-11-1995 to 19-12-1995 there is no other reference regarding his work . It is true that his name was called from the employment exchange and he was appointed in the. bank. A requisition was sent to the employment exchange for employment of some persons. His name was sent but in the appointment letter it has been mentioned that he has been appointment for a temporary period. The claimant himself has said that he worked for a very short period. He was appointed on a temporary post for less than 3 months and before that 3 months he was removed from service .

NewDelhi , the 16th March, 2004

S. O. 788. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 , Sub -Section ( 1 ) of the Emigration Act, 1983 (31 of1983), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri P. C.Bhardwaj Section Officer of the CSS cadre of Ministry ofLabour, as Protector of Emigrants, Chandigarh withef- fect from 24th February, 2004 (Forenoon).

[No. S- 13011/ 1/2003 -Emig.]

ASHOLI CHALAI, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2004

Itwas argued from the side of management that the letter which was sent to employment exchange clearlymen- tions that the post is purely temporarily and for less than 3 months. As such the workman was employed for less than 3 months and he worked for less than 3 months and the name which was called for appointment was for less than 3 months . In the circumstances it becomes quite clear that some temporary workman where required for less than 3 months services and the post was purely temporarily. So his appointment was for less than 3 months and he was removed after approximately 2 months later. So he has not worked for 240 days and his appointment was not regular. The case law cited by the workman do not apply in the facts and circumstances of the case the workman is not entitled to get any relief.

The point referred to for adjudication is replied thus.

का० आ० 789.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल , 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है) के उपबन्ध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

The action of the management of the Bank of Baroda in terminating the services of Sh. Ram Kumar w.e.f. 19-12-95 is quite legal and justified and he is not entitled to get any relief. The Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 24-02-04

"जिला तृश्शूर के मुकुंद पुरम तालुक में कुरूविलश्शेरी के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र " ।

R.N.RAI PRESIDING OFFICER

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2004

[संख्या एस-38013/15/04- एस . एस.- I ]

के. सी. जैन निदेशक

New Delhi , the 16th March, 2004 का० आ० 787.- राष्ट्रपति, श्री ए. आर. सिद्दिकी को 08-03-04 (पूर्वाह्न ) से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय, बंगलौर के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्तकरते हैं ।

[संख्याः ए -11016/4/2002 सी एल एस- II ]

वाई. पी. सहगल अवर सचिव

New Delhi the 18th March, 2004

S. O. 789.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (3 )of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insur- ance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April, 2004 as the date on which the provi- sions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (except sub- section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 789and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall Come into force in the following areas in the State ofKerala namely:-

S. O. 787.- The President is pleased to appoint Sh . A. R. Siddiqui as Presding Officer Center Govt. Industrial Tribunal-Cum - Labour Court, Bangalore w.e.f. 08-03-04 (F. N.) for a period ofthree years.

[No. A- 11016/4/2002-CLS- II]

" KURUVILASSERYIN MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK IN TRICHUR DISTRICT. "

Y. P. SEHGAL, Under Secy.

संरक्षी प्रभाग

[No. S- 38013/15/2004-S.S.L. ] K. C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च 2004

नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2004

का० आ०788.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, उत्प्रवास अधिनियम , 1983

का० आ० 790.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उपधारा (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का 1454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 27, 2004/CHAITRA 7, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] =

प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल , 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44वं 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और6 ( धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77,78,79 और 81 के सित्राय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI ( except Sub- section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79and 81 which have already beenbrought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely:-

"जिला तृश्शूर के तालाप्पाल्ली तालुक में पाम्पडी के आधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र " ।

[संख्या एस-38013/16/2004- एस. एस.- I ]

"Areas comprising the Revenue Villages of V. pudukkottai, Kaithinkottai of Vedasanthur Taluk in Dindigul District . "

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

[No. S- 38013/ 17/2004-S.S.I. ] New Delhi , the 16th March, 2004

K. C. .JAIN, Director

(रोजगार और प्रशिक्षण महानिदेशालय )

नई दिल्ली, 23 मार्च , 2004

S. O. 790.- In exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insur- ance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2004 as the date on which the provi- sions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI (except Sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofKerala namely:-

का०आ ० 792.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, शिक्षु अधिनियम, 1961 (1961 का 52 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, और केन्द्रीय शिक्षुता परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियमों के प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रौद्योगिकी के क्षेत्र में निम्नलिखित विषय को अभिहित व्यवसायों के रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करता है, अर्थात्:-

"PAMPADI IN THALAPPALLY TALUK OF TRICHUR DISTRICT. "

[No. S- 38013/ 16/2004- S.S.L ] केलिए 1. " मुद्रण प्रौद्योगिकी" तकनीशियन (व्यावसायिक ) शिक्षुओं K. C. JAIN , Director

2. " पैकेजिंग प्रौद्योगिकी " तकनीशियन शिक्षुओं के लिए । नई दिल्ली, 19 मार्च, 2004

[फा०सं० डीजीईटी-2 ( 1 ) /2003 -एपी ]

एन. लंका, उप सचिव

(Directorate General of Employment and Training)

New Delhi , the 23rd March, 2004 का० श्रा० 791.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 अप्रैल, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धोरा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात् -

S.O. 792. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( e) of Section 2 of the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), and after consultation with the Central Apprentice- ship Council , the Central Government hereby specifies the following subject fields in technology as designated trades for the purposes of the said Act , namely :-

" दिण्डुगल जिला में वडसन्तुर तालुक के वी. पुदुकोट्टै कैतियनको‌ट्टै आदि राजस्व ग्राम " ।

1. " Printing Technology" for Technician (Vocational ) Apprentices

[संख्या एस -38013/17/2004- एस. एस. - 1 ]

के. सी. जैन, निदेशक

2. "Packaging Technology" for Technician Appren- tices.

NewDelhi the 19th March, 2004

[F. No. DGET-2( 1 )/2003 -AP]

N. LANKA , Dy. Secy.

S. O. 791. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi- 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.