This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

REGD . No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05

सममेव जयते

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 19 ]

नईदिल्ली, मई 2 -मई 8 , 2004 , शनिवार /वैसाख 12- वैसाख 18; 1926

No. 191

NEW DELHI , MAY 2-MAY 8, 2004, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 12-VAISAKHA 18, 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड ( ii ) PART II-Section 3 Sub- section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

विधिऔर न्याय मंत्रालय (विधि कार्य विभाग )

ज्ञापन सं. एफ. 23/( 2 ) 2001 न्या., तारीख 14 मई, 2001 में अंतर्विष्ट फीसके विवरण के अनुसार फीस की हकदार होंगी

(न्यायिकअनुभाग )

[सं. एफ. 23(2 ) /2004 -न्या. ] नई दिल्ली, 22 अप्रैल, 2004

डी. आर. मीणा, संयुक्त सचिव और सलाहकार

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Department of Legal Affairs) (JUDICIAL SECTION)

New Delhi , the 22nd April , 2004

का.आ. 1110.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 (1974का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्रीमती हिना. पी. शाह , अधिवक्ता को मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय में भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी कार्यालय या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग द्वारा या उसके विरुद्ध सभी दांडिक मामलों का, जिसके अंतर्गत दांडिक रिट याचिकाएं, दांडिक अपीलें, दांडिक पुनरीक्षण, दांडिक निर्देश और दांडिक आवेदन भी हैं , संचालन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अध्यधीन तुरंत प्रभाव से तीन वर्ष की अवधिके लिए या अगले आदेश तक, इनमें से जो भी पूर्वतर हो , अपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती हैः-

( 1 ) श्रीमती हिना पी . शाह , अधिवक्ता, 'उक्त तीन वर्ष की अवधि के दौरान मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय में किसी भी दांडिक मामलों में भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी कार्यालय या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग के विरुद्ध उपसंजात नहीं होंगी ।

S.O. 1110.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Smt . Hina P. Shah , Advocate , as Additional Public Prosecutor for the propose, of conducting all criminal cases including Criminal Writ Petitions , Criminal Appeals , Criminal Revisions , Criminal references and Criminal Application by or against the Union of India or any Centra! Government Office or any Department of the Central Government, in the High Court of judicature at Mumbai , for a period of three years or until further orders , whichever (2) श्रीमती हिना पी . शाह , अधिवक्ता, विधि, न्याय और कंपनी कार्य मंत्रालय , विधि कार्य विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा जारी , कार्यालय 1344GI/04

(2173) [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

2174

is earlier with immediate effect , subject to the following conditions , namely :-

आर.पी. वातल को टीआईआईसी, चेन्नई के पूर्व अध्यक्ष श्री पी.वी. राजारमन के स्थान पर 30 अप्रैल , 2004 से तीन वर्ष की अवधिके लिए या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक के बोर्ड में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

(a) Smt . Hina P. Shah , Advocate , shall not appear ' against the Union of India or any Central Government Office or any Department of the Central Government in any criminal cases referred to above in the High Court of Judicature at Mumabi during the said period of three years;

[फा.सं. 24 (5 )/2002- आईएफ -1 ] ए. के. राय, निदेशक,

New Delhi , the 30th April, 2004 (b) Smt . Hina P. Shah , Advocate , shall be entitled to the fee as per the statement of fees contained in theOffice Memorandum No. F. 23 (2)2001 -Judl . Dated the 14th May, 2001 , issued by the Ministry ofLaw , Justice and Company Affairs , Department of Legal Affairs , New Delhi .

[F. No. 23 (2)/2004- Judl . ]

D.R MEENA , Jt . Secy . and Legal Adviser .

S.O. 1112-In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (e) of Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section (6) of the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act , 1989 (39 of 1989), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri R.P. Watal , Managing Director , Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation (APSFC) Vice Shri P.V. Rajaraman , Ex-Chairman TIIC , Chennai , as part tirne non - official Director on the Board of Small Industries Development Bank of India for a period of three years with effect from 30th April , 2004 ог until further orders , whichever is earlier .

वित्त मंत्रालय ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 30 अप्रैल, 2004

[F. No. 24 (5)/2002-IF.-1 ] A. K. RAI , Director

रेल मंत्रालय (रेलवे बोर्ड) नई दिल्ली , 12 अप्रैल , 2004

का.आ. 1111. बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 56 के साथ पठित धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों कोप्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध सरकारी राजपत्र में इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से 31 मार्च, 2005 तक मिजोरम को-आपरेटिव एपेक्स बैंक लि० , आइजोल पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[फा.सं. 1 (7)/2004- एसी] खड्ग सिंह, अवर सचिव

का.आ. 1113.-रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड ) , राजभाषा नियम, 1976 ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 2 ) और ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में मध्य रेलवे के भुसावल तथा सोलापुर मंडल, उत्तर रेलवे के मुख्य प्रशासनिक अधिकारी /निर्माण तथा दक्षिण रेलवे के तिरुवनंतपुरम मंडल के निम्नलिखित रेल कार्यालयों को, जहां 80 % से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है : - मध्य रेलवे ( भुसावल मंडल )

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Economic Affairs ) (BANKING DIVISION)

1 . सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) एम.एल. , भुसावल

2. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) यार्ड, भुसावल

3. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) भंडार, भुसावल

4. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) नासिक रोड

5. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) दक्षिण , चालीसगांव

6. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) उत्तर , चालीसगांव

7. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) पूर्व , अकोला New Delhi , the 30th April , 2004 S.O. 1111. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) the Central Government on recomrnendation of the Reserve Bank of India declares that the provision of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Actshall not apply to Mizoram Co - operative Apex Bank Ltd. , Aizawl from the date of publication of this notification inthe Official Gazette till 31 March, 2005 .

8. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) बडनेरा

9. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) ब.ला. खंडवा [F.No. 1 (7)/2004- AC] KHARG SINGH, Under Secy.

10. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) पाचोरा नई दिल्ली, 30 अप्रैल, 2004

11. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( कार्य ) मे.ला. , भुसावल

12. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( कार्य ) नासिक रोड

13. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( कार्य ) , मनमाड

14. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( कार्य ) , मुर्तिजापुर का.आ. 1112.- भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक अधिनियम, 1989 ( 1989 का 39 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ङ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , आंध्र प्रदेश स्टेट फाइनेंस कार्पोरेशन ( एपीएसएफसी ) के प्रबंध निदेशक श्री [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

15. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , भुसावल

2175 7. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , मुंढेवाडी

8 .

स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , मोहोल

16. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , मनमाड

17. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , अकोला

18. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , बुरहानपुर

9. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, मलिकपेठ

10. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , अनगर

19. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , खंडवा

11. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, वाकाव

12. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, माढा

20. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , जलगांव

13. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, वडसिंगे

21. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , पाचोरा

22. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी) , चालीसगांव

23. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , नांदगांव

24. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी) , निफाड

25. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , इगतपुरी

26. जूनियर इंजीनियर (टीडी) , शेगांव

27. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी ) , मुर्तिजापुर

28. जूनियर इंजीनियर ( टीडी) , नेपानगर

14. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, कुर्जुवाडी ( छो.ला. )

15. वरिष्ठ मंडल चिकित्सा अधिकारी , कुर्दुवाडी

16. सहायक मंडल इंजीनियर, ( छो.ला. ) कुर्जुवाडी 17. सहायक मंडल इंजीनियर, ( छो.ला. ) कुर्जुवाडी 18. सेक्शन इंजीनियर, ( सिगनल ) , कुर्दुवाडी

19. मुख्य पार्सल /बुकिंग पर्यवेक्षक, कुर्जुवाडी

20. मुख्य गुड्स पर्यवेक्षक, कुर्जुवाडी

29. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सिगनल ) , नासिक रोड 30. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर (सिगनल ) , मनमाड 21 . सहायक मंडल इंजीनियर, ( सि व दू. सं/अनु. ) , दौंड 22. मुख्य बुकिंग पर्यवेक्षक, दौंड

31. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सिगनल ) चालीसगांव 23. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, दौंड

24. मुख्य आरक्षण पर्यवेक्षक, दौंड

32. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सिगनल ) , भुसावल 33. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सिगनल ) , अकोला 25. मुख्य माल पर्यवेक्षक, दौंड

26. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, काष्टी

34. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर (सिगनल ) , खंडवा

35. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( दूरसंचार ) , मनमाड 27. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, श्रीगोंदा रोड

28. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , बेलवंडी

36. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( दूरसंचार ) , आटो, भुसावल 29. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , विसापुर

37. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( दूरसंचार ) , अकोला 38. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( दूरसंचार ) , खंडवा 30. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, रांजणगांव रोड

31. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, सारौला

39. सहायक सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर, एमडब्ल्यू, भुसावल 40. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( विद्युत ) , भुसावल

32. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, अकोलनेर

33. मुख्य माल पर्यवेक्षक, अहमदनगर

41. सीनियर सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( टीएल ) , भुसावल

42. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( विद्युत ) , मनमाड

43. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( विद्युत ) , चालीसगांव

44. सेक्शन इंजीनियर (विद्युत ) , अकोला

34. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, अहमदनगर

35. मुख्य बुकिंग पर्यवेक्षक, अहमदनगर

36. सेक्शन इंजीनियर (विद्युत ) , अहमदनगर

37. प्रधान टिकट संग्राहक, अहमदनगर

45. सेक्शन इंजीनियर (विद्युत ) , खंडवा

38. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, निंबलक

46. सेक्शन इंजीनियर 1 ( विद्युत ) , बडनेरा

39 .

स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , विलद

47. मुख्य कर्मीदल नियंत्रक ( सवारी ) भुसावल

48. लोको निरीक्षक मनमाड

40. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , बाम्बोरी

41 .

प्रधान टिकट संग्राहक, कुर्जुवाडी

49. लोको फोरमैन, इगतपुरी

42. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, ढवलस

50. लोको फोरमैन , नांदगांव

51. लोको फोरमैन, बडनेरा

43. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, केम

44. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, भालवनी

52. लोको फोरमैन, खंडवा

45. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, जेऊर

मध्यरेलवे ( सोलापुर मंडल )

46. सेक्शन इंजनियर ( रेल पथ ) , जेऊर

1. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, सोलापुर

47. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , पोफलज

2. मुख्य आरक्षण पर्यवेक्षक, सोलापुर

48. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, वाशिम्बे

3. मुख्य माल पर्यवेक्षक, सोलापुर

49. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , पारेवाडी

4. मुख्य टिकट निरीक्षक, सोलापुर

5. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, बाले

50 . स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, जिंतीरोड

51 .

स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, भिगवन

6. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , पाकनी THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2176

52. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, मलठन

53. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , बोरीवेल,

54. मुख्य यार्ड मास्टर, दौंड

55. मुख्य कर्मीदल नियंत्रक, दौंड

56. वरिष्ठ सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सवारी एवं माल डिब्बा ) , दौंड 57. वरिष्ठ सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सवारी एवं माल डिब्बा ) , वाडी 58. मंडल चिकित्सा अधिकारी , वाड़ी

59. मुख्य कर्मीदल नियंत्रक, वाडी

60. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, वाडी

61. मुख्य बुकिंग पर्यवेक्षक, वाडी

62. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, शाहबाद

63. सहायक मंडल इंजीनियर, शाहबाद

64. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( कार्य ) , शाहाबाद

65. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , राहुरी

66. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, पढ़ेगांव

67. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , बेलापुर

68. मुख्य बुकिंग पर्यवेक्षक, बेलापुर

69. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, बेलापुर

70. मुख्य माल पर्यवेक्षक, बेलापुर

71. प्रधान टिकट संग्राहक, बेलापुर

72. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , कान्हेगांव

73. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , चितली

74. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , कोपरगांव

75. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) , येवला

76. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , येवला

77. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , वाडी

78. मुख्य यार्ड मास्टर, वाडी

79. वरिष्ठ सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( विद्युत ) , वाडी

80. प्रधान टिकट संग्राहक, वाडी

81. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, नागणसुर

82. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , अक्कलकोट रोड 83. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , तिलाटी

84. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , होटगी

85. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , टिकेकरवाडी

86. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , मोडलिम्ब

87. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) , पंढरपुर

88. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सवारी एवं माल डिब्बा ) , पंढरपुर 89. मुख्य पार्सल/बुकिंग पर्यवेक्षक, शहाबाद

90. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) , शहाबाद

91. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , मरतूर

92. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, हिरेनंदूरु

93. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, गुलबर्गा

94. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) , गुलबर्गा

95. सिगनल निरीक्षक, गुलबर्गा

96. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( विद्युत ) , गुलबर्गा

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 97. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, गुलबर्गा

98. मुख्य माल पर्यवेक्षक, गुलबर्गा

99. मुख्य आरक्षण पर्यवेक्षक, गुलबर्गा

100. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( कार्य ) , गुलाबर्गा

101. प्रधान टिकट संग्राहक, गुलबर्गा

102. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, बबलाद

103 . स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , सावलगी

104. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, हुन्सीहडगिल

105. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, गंगापुर रोड

106. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, गौडगांव

107. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, कुलाली

108 . स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, दुधनी

109. सेक्शन इंजीनियर (रेल पथ ) , दुधनी

110. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , बोरोटी

111. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , बोहाली

112. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , वासुद

113. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, जतरोड

114. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, ढालगांव

115. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , कवठेमहाकाल

116. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, सलगरे

117. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , अरग

118. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , मिरज श्री

119. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( सवारी एवं माल डिब्बा ) , मिरज बी 120. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , शेंदरी

121. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, बारसी टाऊन

122. सेक्शन इंजीनियर ( रेल पथ ) , बारसी टाऊन

123. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , पांगरी

124. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, कलम्बरोड

125. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , ढोकी

126. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , मुरूड

127. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय , औसा रोड

128. स्टेशन प्रबंधक कार्यालय, लातूर

129. मुख्य पार्सल पर्यवेक्षक, लातूर

130. मुख्य माल पर्यवेक्षक, लातूर

131. मुख्य आरक्षण पर्यवेक्षक, लातूर

उत्तर रेलवे ( मुख्य प्रशासनिक अधिकारी/निर्माण कार्यालय ) 1. मुख्य विद्युत इंजीनियर/निर्माण /तिलकब्रिज, नई दिल्ली 2. मुख्य सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/ निर्माण/I , II, बड़ौदा हॉऊस , नई दिल्ली

3. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण/तिलकब्रिज, नई दिल्ली 4. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण/तिलकब्रिज/सर्वे, नई दिल्ली 5. उप मुख्य सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/निर्माण/तिलक ब्रिज, नईदिल्ली 2177

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6. उप मुख्य सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/निर्माण/विशेष/ तिलक ब्रिज , नई दिल्ली

7. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/ निर्माण/शिवाजी ब्रिज, नई दिल्ली 8. उप मुख्य विद्युत इंजीनियर/निर्माण/शिवाजी ब्रिज, नई दिल्ली 9. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण/स्टेट एंट्री रोड, नई दिल्ली 10. उप मुख्य विद्युत इंजीनियर/निर्माण/मंडल कार्यालय , नई दिल्ली 11. उप मुख्य सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/निर्माण/विशेष/मंडल कार्यालय, नई दिल्ली

12. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण/पटेल नगर, नई दिल्ली 13. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण/लखनऊ

14. उप मुख्य सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/ निर्माण/लखनऊ 15. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण/अंबाला

16. उप मुख्य इंजीनियर/निर्माण /मुरादाबाद

17. वरिष्ठ इंजीनियर/निर्माण/अमरोहा

18. वरिष्ठ इंजीनियर/निर्माण/गाजियाबाद

19. वरिष्ठ इंजीनियर/निर्माण/सहारनपुर

20. वरिष्ठ विद्युत इंजीनियर/निर्माण/लखनऊ

21. सहायक इंजीनियर/ निर्माण/बठिण्डा

22. सहायक सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/ निर्माण/मुरादाबाद 23. सहायक इंजीनियर/निर्माण/पानीपत

24. सहायक सिगनल एवं दूरसंचार इंजीनियर/निर्माण/वाराणसी दक्षिण रेलवे ( तिरूवनंतपुरम मंडल )

1. क्षेत्र प्रबंधक कार्यालय / एरणाकुलम [सं. हिन्दी-2003/रा.भा./1 /12/3 ] वी० एन ० माथुर, सचिव MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAILWAY BOARD) New Delhi, the 12th April , 2004

S.O. 1113.-Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) , in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language Rules , 1976 (use for the official purposes of the Union ) hereby , notify the following offices of Bhusawal and Solapur Division of Central Railway, Chief Administrative Officer , Construction of Northern Railway and Thiruvanthapuram Division of Southern Railway, where 80 % or more Officers/Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :-

Central Railway (BSL Division)

1. Sr. Section Engineer (P. Way) ML , BSL 2. Sr. Section Engineer (P. Way) Yard, BSL 3. Sr. Section Engineer (P. Way ) Store, BSL 4. Section Engineer (P. Way) Nasik Road 5. Section Engineer (P. Way) Soth , Chalisgaon 6. Section Engineer (P. Way) North, Chalisgaon 7. Section Engineer (P. Way) East, Akola 8. Sr. Section Engineer ( P. Way) , Badnera 9. Sr. Section Engineer (P. Way) B.G. Khandwa 10. Sr. Section Engineer (P. Way) Pachora

11 . Sr. Section Engineer (Work) ML , BSL

12. Sr. Section Engineer (Work) Nasik Road 13. Sr. Section Engineer ( Work) Manmad

14. Sr. Section Engineer ( Work) Murtizapur 15. Sr. Section Engineer (TD) BSL

16. Sr. Section Engineer (TD) Manmad

17. Sr. Section Engineer ( TD) Akola

18. Sr. Section Engineer (TD) Burhanpur

19. Sr. Section Engineer ( TD) Khandwa

20. Jr. Engineer (TD) Jalgoan

21 . Jr. Engineer ( TD) Pachora

22. Jr. Engineer (TD) Chalisgoan

23. Jr. Engineer ( TD) Nandgaon

24. Jr. Engineer (TD) Niphad

25. Jr. Engineer ( TD) Igatpuri

26. Jr. Engineer ( TD) Shegaon

27. Jr. Engineer (TD) Murtizapur

28 . Jr. Engineer (TD) Nepanagar

29. Sr. Section Engineer (Signal ) Nasik Road 30. Sr. Section Engineer (Signal ) Manmad 31 . Sr. Section Engineer (Signal ) Chalisgaon 32. Sr. Section Engineer (Signal ) BSL

33. Sr. Section Engineer (Signal ) Akola

34. Sr. Section Engineer ( Signal ) Khandwa 35. Sr. Section Engineer (Tele) Manmad

36. Sr. Section Engineer (Tele) Auto , BSL

37. Sr. Section Engineer (Tele) Akola

38. Sr. Section Engineer (Tele ) Khandwa

39. Asstt. Signal & Tele . Engineer MW, BSL 40. Sr. Section Engineer (Elec . ) BSL

41. Sr. Section Engineer (TL) BSL

42. Section Engineer ( Elec .) Manmad

43. Section Engineer ( Elec.) Chalisgaon

44. Section Engineer (Elec . ) Akola

45. Section Engineer ( Elec .) Khandwa

46. Section Engineer - I (Elec.) Badnera

47. Chief Crew Controller (Passr . ) BSL

48. Loco Inspector , Manmad

49. Loco Foremen, Igatpur

50. Loco Foremen , Nandgaon

51. Loco Foremen , Badnera 2178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

52. Loco Foremen , Khandwa

CENTRAL RAILWAY (SOLAPUR DIVISION) 1. ChiefParcel Supervisor , Solapur

2. Chief Reservation Supervisor, Solapur 3. Chief Goods Supervisor , Solapur

4. Chief Ticket Inspector , Solapur

5. Station Manager's Office , Bale

6. Station Manager's Office , Pakni

7. Station Manager's Office , Mundhewadi 8. Station Manager's Office , Mohol

9. Station Manager's Office , Malikpeth

10. Station Manager's Office , Angar

11. Station Manager's Office , Vakav

12. Station Manager's Office , Madha

13. Station Manager's Office , Wadsinge

14. Station Manager's Office , Kurduwadi (NG) 15. Sr. Divl . Medical Officer , Kurduwadi

16. Assistant Divisional Engineer (NG ) Kurduwadi 17. Assistant Divisional Engineer (NG) Kurduwadi 18. Section Engineer ( Signal ) Kurduwadi 19. Chief Parcel/Booking Supervisor , Kurduwadi 20. Chief Goods Supervisor, Kurduwadi 21. Assistant Divisional Engineer (Signal & Tele M) Daund

22. Chief Booking Supervisor , Daund

23. Chief Parcel Supervisor, Daund

24. Chief Reservation Supervisor , Daund 25. Chief Goods Supervisor, Daund

26. Station Manager's Office , Kashti

27. Station Manager's Office , Shrigonda Road 28. Station Manager's Office , Belvandi

29. Station Manager's Office , Visapur

30. Station Manager's Office, Ranjangaon Road 31. Station Manager's Office , Sarola

32. Station Manager's Office , Akolner

33. Chief Goods Supervisor , Ahmednagar 34. Chief Parcel Supervisor , Ahmednagar 35. Chief Booking Supervisor , Ahmednagar 36. Section Engineer (Electrical) ,. Ahmednagar 37. Head Ticket Collector , Ahmednagar

38. Station Manager's Office , Nimblak

39. Station Manager's Office , Vilad

40. Station Manager's Office , Vambori

41. Head Ticket Collector , Kurduwadi

42. Station Manager's Office, Dhavlas

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)] 43. Station Manager's Office , Kem

44. Station Manager's Office , Bhalwani

45. Station Manager's Office , Jeur

46. Section Engineer (P. Way ) , Jeur

47. Station Manager's Office , Pophlaj

48. Station Manager's Office , Washimbe

49. Station Manager's Office , Parewadi

50. Station Manager's Office , Jinti Road

51. Station Manager's Office, Bhigwan

52. Station Manager's Office , Malthan

53. Station Manager's Office , Boribial

54. ChiefYard Master , Daund

55. Chief Crew Controller , Daund

56. Sr. Section Engineer (C & W) , Daund

57. Sr. Section Engineer (C & W), Wadi

58. Divisional Medical Officer, Wadi

59. Chief Crew Controller , Wadi

60. Chief Parcel Supervisor , Wadi

61 . Chief Booking Supervisor , Wadi

62. Station Manager's Office , Shahabad

63. Assistant Divisional Engineer , Shahabad 64. Section Engineer (Works ), Shahabad 65. Station Manager's Office , Rahuri

66. Station Manager's Office , Padhegoan 67. Station Manager's Office , Belapur

68. Chief Booking Supervisor , Belapur

69. Chief Parcel Supervisor , Belapur

70. ChiefGoods Supervisor, Belapur

71. Head Ticket Collector , Belapur

72. Station Manager ' Office , Kanhegoan 73. Station Manager's Office , Chitali

74. Station Manager's Office , Kopargaon 75. Section Engineer (P. Way) , Yeola

76. Station Manager's Office , Yeolas

77. Station Manager's Office , Wadi

78. Chief Yard Master , Wadi

79. Sr. Section Engineer (Elect ) , Wadi

80. Head Ticket Collecetor , Wadi

81. Station Manager's Office , Nagansur

82. Station Manager's Office , Akkalkot Road 83. Station Manager's Office , Tilati

84. Station Manager's Office , Hotgi

85. Station Manager's Office, Tikekarwadi 86. Station Manager's Office , Modlimb

87. Section Engineer (P. Way) , Pandharpur [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

88. Section Engineer ( C & W) , Pandharpur 89. Chief Parcel/Booking Supervisor , SDB 90. Section Engineer (P. Way) , SDB

91. Station Manager's Office , Martur

92. Station Manager's Office , Hirenanduru 93. Station Manager's Office , Gulbarga

94. Section Engineer (P. Way), Gulbarga

95. Signal Inspector , Gulbarga

96. Section Engineer (Elec .) . Gulbarga

97. Chief Parcel Supervisor , Gulbarga

98. Chief Goods Supervisor , Gulbarga

99. Chief Reservation Supervisor , Gulbarga 100. Section Engineer ( Works ) , Gulbarga

101. Head Ticket Collector, Gulbarga

102. Station Manager's Office , Bablad

103. Station Manager's Office , Sawalgi

104. Station Manager's Office, Hunsihadgil 105. Station Manager's Office , Gangapur Road 106. Station Manager's Office , Gaudgaon

107. Station Manager's Office, Kulali

108. Station Manager's Office , Dudhani

109. Section Engineer (P. Way) , Dudhani

110. Station Manager's Office, Boroti

111. Station Manager's Office , Bohali

112. Station Manager's Office , Wasud

113. Station Manager's Office , Jath Road

114. Station Manager's Office , Dhalgoan

115. Station Manager's Office , Kavathemahankal 116. Station Manager's Office , Salgare

117. Station Manager's Office , Arag

118. Station Manager's Office , Miraj B

119. Section Engineer ( C & W), Miraj B

120. Station Manager's Office , Shendri

121. Station Manager's Office , Barsi Town 122. Section Engineer (P. Way) , Barsi Town 123. Station Manager's Office , Pangri

124. Station Manager's Office , Kalamb Road 125. Station Manager's Office , Dhoki

126. Station Manager's Office , Murud

127. Station Manager's Office , Ausa Road 128. Station Manager's Office , Latur

129. Chief Parcel Supervisor , Latur

130. Chief Goods Supervisor, Latur

131. Chief Reservation Supervisor , Latur

Northern Railway ( Office of Chief Administrative Officer/ Construction)

1. Chief Electrical Engineer /Construction/Tilak Bridge/New Delhi

2. Chief S & T Engineer I , II / Construction/Baroda House.

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

2179 3. Dy . Chief Engineer/ Construction/Tilak Bridge/ New Delhi

4. Dy. Chief Engineer/ Construction/ Survey/ Tilak Bridge/New Delhi .

5. Dy . Chief S & T Engineer/ Construction/Tilak Bridge/ New Delhi

6. Dy . Chief S & T Engineer/Construction/Spl . / Tilak Bridge/ New Delhi

7. Dy . Chief Engineer/ Construction/Shivaji Bridge/ New Delhi .

8. Dy. Chief Electrical Engineer / Construction/ Shivaji Bridge/ New Delhi

9. Dy. Chief Engineer/ Construction/State Entry Road , NewDelhi .

10. Dy . Chief Electrical Engineer/Construction/ D.R.M. Office/New Delhi .

11 . Dy . Chief S & T Engineer/ Construction/ Spl/ D.R.M. Office/New Delhi .

12. Dy. Chief Engineer/ Construction/Patel Nagar , New Delhi .

13 . Dy. Chief Engineer / Construction /Lucknow.

14. Dy.Chief S & TEngineer/Construction / Lucknow.

15 . Dy . Chief Engineer/ Construction/Ambala 16. Dy . Chief Engineer /Construction /Moradabad 17. Senior Engineer/ Construction/Amroha .

18. Senior Engineer/ Construction/Ghaziabad.

19. Senior Engineer/Construction/ Saharanpur .

20. Senior Engineer/Construction/Lucknow .

21. Asstt . Engineer/ Construction/Bhatinda .

22 Asstt . S & T Engineer /Construction /Moradabad .

23. Asstt . Engineer/ Construction /Panipat.

24. Asstt . Signal & Telecommunication Engineer/ Construction/Varanasi .

SOUTHERN RAILWAY (Thiruvanthapuram Division) 1. Area Manager's Office , Ernakulam

[No. Hinidi -2003/OL - 1 / 12/03 ]

V. N. MATHUR, Secy .

विद्युत मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 19 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1114.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में भाखड़ा ब्यास प्रबंध बोर्ड, चंडीगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारी- वृंद ने हिन्दी का कार्य- साघक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :

1. अधीक्षण अभियंता,

तलवाडा परिमंडल, भाखड़ा ब्यास प्रबंध बोर्ड, तलवाड़ा टाउनशिप, जिला-होशियारपुर ( पंजाब ) [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2180

Undertakings under the administrative control of Bhakra Beas Management Board, Chandigarh , the Staffwhereof have acquired 80% working knowledge of Hindi :

2. अधीक्षण अभियंता, पौंग बांध परिमंडल, भाखड़ा ब्यास प्रबंध बोर्ड, तलवाड़ा टाउनशिप, जिला-होशियारपुर ( पंजाब )

1. The Superintending Engineer, Talwara Circle, Bhakra Beas Management Board, Talwara Township, Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab)

3. अधीक्षण अभियंता, देहर.विद्युत गृह परिमंडल भाखड़ा ब्यास प्रबंध बोर्ड, सलापड़ ( हिमाचल प्रदेश )

2. The Superintending Engineer , PongDam Circle, Bhakra Beas Management Board, Talwara Township , Distt. Hoshiarpur (Punjab )

[सं. 11017/1/2004- हिंदी ] अजय शकंर, संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi , the 19th April , 2004

3. The Superintending Engineer , Dehar Power House Circle, Bhakra Beas Management Board , Salapar (Himachal Pradesh ) .

[No. 11017/ 1 /2004-Hindi ] AJAY SHANKAR, Jt. Secy .

S.O. 1114.-In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4 ) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifices the following offices of the Public Sector

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल , 2004

का. आ. 1115. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

अनु.वर्ष

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

क्रम. लाइसेंस संख्या

भामा भाग संख्या

लाइसेंस धारी का नाम व पता

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

सं.

1 2

82 2001/10

01660 01

1. 9307172

पिटवां एल्युमीनियम के बर्तन कुकिंग टेबल , सर्विंग ,

भंडारण व बेकिंग के बर्तन

बिमल एल्युमीनियम्स प्रा.लि. 31 - ए, शिवशंकर नगर, ओरिएंटल इंश्योरेंस कं. के पीछे, कोर्ट रोड़, जगाधरी

14103

2001/10

2. 9307273

क्वालिटी पम्प्स प्रा. लि. 1 बी/ए दादा नगर,

गहराई से पानी निकालने के हथबरमे - घटक- मृदु इस्पात- विशिष्टि

कानपुर

2000

14846

2001/10

3. 9307374

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

सचदेवा मेटल वर्क्स सी-33एक्सटें , फोकल प्वाइंट

(50-1200 मिमी साइज )

जालंधर

02062

2001/10

4. 9307475

सामान्य संरचना इस्पात- विशिष्टि

कश्मीर स्टील रोलिंग मिल्स सिडको लेन नं. 2 इंडस्ट्रियल कॉम्पलेक्स बारी ब्राह्मण जम्मू

00303

2001/10

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

5. 9307576

लुम्बरटेक (प्रा) लि. 57 किमी स्टोन दिल्ली रोहतक रोड गाँव इस्मालिया, जिला रोहतक [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख18, 1926

2181 1 2

7 6. 9307677

2001/10

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

लुम्बरटेक (प्रा) लि. 57 किमी स्टोन दिल्ली रोहतक रोड गाँव इस्मालिया जिला रोहतक

7. 9307778

2001/10

00710

समुद्रीउपयोग हेतु प्लाईवुड

ग्लैक्सीप्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा) लि. गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

8. 9307879

2001/10

01328

परतचड़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

ग्लैक्सी प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा) लि. गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

9. 9307980

2001/10

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

जीएमजी प्लाईवुड ( प्रा) लि. गाँव कामीमाजरा खजूरी रोड, यमुनानगर

10. 9308073

2001/11

09828

सुवाद्ध हवा भरे सेंडर

सर्द मेटल्स प्रालि. प्लॉट नं. 45 सेक्टर -23 फरीदाबाद

11. 9308174

2001/10

पावर प्रेशर

09020

79 गोबिन्दइंडस्ट्रीज दशहरा बाग , बाराबंकी

12. 9308275

2001/11

03564

द्रव्यचालित नियंत्रित डोर क्लोरार-विशिष्टि

शिवा इंटरप्राइजिज शेड नं. 10 सिटको कॉम्पलैक्स हालोमजरा चंडीगढ़

13. 9308376

2001/11

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

शिव शम्भूप्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. वीपीओ बुरिया, जिला यमुनानगर

14. 9308477

2001/11

ब्लॉड बोर्ड

01659

90 शिव शम्भूप्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. वीपीओ बुरिया , जिला यमुनानगर

15. 9308578

2001/10

01879

धातुवर्ण्य ढलको लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

बी.एस.स्टील इंडस्ट्रीज सुभाष नगर इंड. एरिया, जालंधर

16. 9308679

2001/10

00278

कड़ लग्मने के लिए जस्तीकृत इस्पात

सुनीतमेटेलिक्स कण्डाघाट, जिला सोलन

17. 9308780

2001/10

02721

जस्तीकृत इस्पात कड़ी में जुड़े फैंसवस्त्र

सुनीतमेटेलिक्स कण्डाघाट, जिला सोलन

18. 9308881

2001/10

08472

साफ, ठंडे पानी केलिए पम्प-पुनर्योजी

लीडर पम्प्स एण्ड मोटर्स डी-1/117 संजय कॉलोनी सेक्टर 23, फरीदाबाद

19. 9308982

2001/10

00278

बाड़ लगाने के लिए जस्तीकृत इस्पात

एप्पल वेल्कमेश इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव जटोली पी ओ ऑचमाट जिला चोलन

20. 9309075

2001/11

02553 01

सुरवात काँच

जे.के. हफ एंड ग्लास अवर्स ( रजि. ) प्लॉट नं . 27 लाच्या पिण्ड चॉक चीखें - आरा मण्डी न्यू इंड, एकदेह जालंधर-144004

21. 9309176

2001/11

गागा- गौरवली (लिंग ) ईसी 00632

भारत ऑर्गेनिक्स ए= 2/3 - यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मंडिला, हरकोई

1344 G1/2004-2 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926 .

2182

08944

क्लोरपाइरिफॉस ई सी

2001/11

22. 9309277

भारत ऑर्गेनिक्स ए-2/3 यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, संडिला , हरदोई (उ. प्र. )

00303

-सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/10

23. 9309378

अनिल प्लाई बोर्ड गाँव बरनई अखनूर रोड, जम्मू

14543

2001/11

24. 9309479

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्दप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

सारो प्लास्टिक्स प्रा. लि. 9, हल एंसिल्लरी एस्टेट इस्माइलगंज, फैजाबाद रोड, लखनऊ

00863

हथकरघे से बनी सूती पट्टियाँ

2001/11

25. 9309580

दिहनुमान विवर्स प्रॉडक्टस को आप. इंड. सोसाइटी लि. दिल्ली रोड समीप सेक्टर 12 सोनीपत -131001

03196 01

2001/11

26. 9309681

अल्पदाब द्रवणीय गैसों के लिए 5-लिटर से अधिक जलक्षमता नाले वेल्डित अल्प कार्बन इस्पात के सिलिंडर

एसकेएन इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , 21/18 , 19 , 22, 23, 28/4, एनएच -8; जयपुर- हाइवे रोड, गाँव मालपुरा धारूहेड़ा, जिला रेवाड़ी

08978

2001/10

27. 9309782

तत्काल पोनी सर्म करने के बिजली केहीटर

टेम्पून इंडिया प्लॉट नं. 198 , सेक्टर 24, फरीदाबाद

13428

2001/11

28. 9309883

बोतलबन्द प्राकृतिक खनिज जल

अल्फा एक्वा एसोसिएटस, 7/1 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया रूद्रपुर, जिला यूएस नगर -263153

00455

पोर्टलैंड धातुमल सीमेंट

2001/11

29. 9309984

चेतन सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज , सिकोप इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, कठुआ ( जे एण्ड के) 184 102

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

2001/11

30. 9310060

हिन्दुस्तान प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, खजूरी रोड, यमुना नगर

02347

घरेलू प्रेशर कूकर

2001/11

31. 9310161

एम.के. मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज, एफ-1 , फोकल प्वाइंट एक्सटेंशन , जालंधर

01656

2001/11

32. 9310162

दूध धान्य से बने दूध छुड़ाने के आहार

न्यूट्रिसिया इंडिया प्रा. लि. , डेयरी कॉम्पलेक्स कासगंज रोड, इटा 207 001

07347

2001/11

33. 9310363

कृषि कार्यों में छिड़काव और ऐसे ही उपयोगों के लिएछोटे साइन के स्पार्क प्रज्वलन इंजनों की कार्यकारिता

इंडोजर्मन एग्रीकल्चरल स्प्रेयर एण्डप्रेसिंग वर्क्स, जी.टी. रोड, समीप चाँद सिनेमा , लुधियाना 141 008 2183

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

34. 9310464

2001/11 . पार्वती बेवरेजिज, बडखल एक्सटें. बड़खल, फरीदाबाद 121 001

2001/11

35. 9310565

क्लासिक प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव डामला रादौर रोड. यमुनानगर

2001/11

36. 9310666

क्लासिक प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव डामला रादौर रोड, यमुनानगर

2001/11

37. 9310767

यूनाईटेड टिम्बर वर्क्स, गाँव पंसारा सहारनपुर रोड, यमुनानगर

2001/11

38. 9310868

सुपरपैकर्स, समीप-ऑक्ट्रराय पोस्ट नं. 3 , रादौर रोड, यमुनानगर 39. 9310969

2001/11 सुपरपैकर्स, समीप-ऑक्ट्राय पोस्ट नं. 3 , रादौर रोड, यमुनानगर

2001/11

40. 9311062

दत्त मेडी प्रॉडक्टस लि. , 53-54, रोज का मिओ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, सोहना गुडगाँव

2001/11

41. 9311163

लक्ष्मी मेटल वर्क्स, जी-24 ए, इंडस्ट्रियल फोकल, प्वाइंट जालंधर 144 004

2001/11

42. 9311264

इसका कन्स्ट्रक्शन एण्ड इंजीनियर्स प्रा. लि. सी-2 चिन्हात इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया देवा रोड, लखनऊ

2001/11

43. 9311365

सुरिन्दर इंजी. वर्क्स, धोबियाना रोड, भटिंडा 151 001

2001/11

44. 9311466

हिन्दुस्तान इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, 3124, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस 2 चण्डीगढ़

2001/11

45. 9311567

जतिन्दर के. वायर्स ( प्रा ) लि. , जी.टी. रोड, छान्नी पी ओ दमतल, तह. इंदोर जिला काँगडा 176 430

2001/11

46. 9311668

अल्ट्राबेंवरेजिज प्रा. लि. , एफ सी ए-229 , माहना रोड, बल्लभगढ़ फरीदाबाद

14543

98 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

89 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

00303

सामान्यप्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

90 ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

00758

हथकरघे की बनी अवशोषी अनिर्जर्मिकृत सूती गाँज

تو

09890

सामान्य प्रयोजन के बाल वाल्व

01237

80 सीमेंट कंक्रीट की फर्श बिछाने वाली टाइलें

00694

1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोधित केबल

08978

फनी गर्म करने के इन्सटेंट हीटर

00398 02

झिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) 2184

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

1 2

01328

96 2001/11

47. 9311769

परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

अमित डेकोरेटिव प्लाईवुड, गाँव रामपुर पीओ खरखोदा औचन्दी बॉर्डर समीप सैयदपुर चौक, जिलासोनीपत

02202 01

2001/11

48. 9311870

किटप्लाई इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , शाहबाद रोड, रामपुर (उत्तर प्रदेश)

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

10001

2001/11

49. 9311971

राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक संस्थान 9/99जमुना ब्रिज स्टेशन रोड, आगरा 282 006

सामान्य प्रयोजनो ( 20 किलोवाट तक) के लिए एक समान गतिवाले संपीडन प्रज्वलित (डीजल ) इंजनों हेतु कार्यकारिता संबंधित अपेक्षाएं

03564

द्रवचालित डोर क्लोजर

2001/11

50. 9312064

स्टार हाइड्रोलिक्स सी-78 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया फेस 6 सास नगर

13334 01

2001/12

51. 9312165

मलाई युक्त दूध पाउडर

महानफूडस लि., गाँव कुंजा रामपुर रोड पाँटा साहिब

01239 01

2001/11

52. 9312266

मृदु इस्पात की नालियाँ नालिकाकार सामग्रियाँ तथा पिटवाँ इस्पात की अन्य फिटिंग

एवॉन साईकल्सलि. , स्टील ट्यूब डिवीजन जी.टी. रोड, धनदारीकलाँ, लुधियाना

10908

2001/12

53. 9312367

द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैस के लिए रबड की नम्य नालियाँ

हिन्दुस्तान रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज 19/2/1 ( 13-16) गाँव पाष्टी हथवाला रोड , समाल्खा-132101

08112

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

2001/11

54. 9312468

साधना सीमेंटस प्रा . लि. प्लॉट नं. 702 बारौली काकवन रोड, बिल्होर कानपुर

00164

2001/11

55. 9312569

सड़कों पर निशान लगाने के लिए तैयार शुदारोगन

मूनलाईट पेंट एण्ड एलाइड़ इंडस्ट्रीज रामपुरा रोड गाँव चित्तकलाँ जी.टी. रोड, अमृतसर-143115

09537: 03

2001/12

56. 9312670

अमर ज्योति पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज भुचोकलाँ, भटिंडा

विद्युत संस्थापनके लिए कंडयूट भाग 3 कंडयूट विद्युतरोधक सामग्री के लिए दृढ सांद्र कंडयूट

11501

2001/11

57. 9312771

साफ ठंडें पानी के लिए मोनोसेट पम्प इंजन

शिवास इंडस्ट्रीज जेयोनी मण्डी ( इंदिरा मिल कम्पाउंड) आगरा [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2185 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

58.9212872

2001/12

01891 01

कन्वेयर और एलीवेटर वस्त्रादि पट्टे

नील कण्ठ रबड़ मिल्स गाँव वरयाना कपूरथला रोड जालंधर

2001/12

59. 9312973

08112

43ग्रेड साधारणपोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

जय इंडस्ट्रीज अड्‌डासरौर बारी ब्राहम्ण जम्मू(जे एण्डके)

60. 9313066

2001/12

00814

महिन्द्रा इलैक्ट्रोड्स भटिंडारोड, भुचो कलां जिला भटिंडा 151 101

हस्तय धातु आर्क वेल्डिग के लिए आवृत्त कार्बन और कार्बन मेंगनीज इस्पात इलैक्ट्रोड

2001/12

61. 9313167

चकोरदार सीमेंट कंकरीट 13801

टाइले

सेमाक्रेट इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव मुबारकपुर समीप पावर हाऊस , तहसील-राजपुरा जिला पटियाला

2001/12

62. 6313268

02721

79 एपल वेल्डमेश इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव जटोली पीओ औचघाट जिलासोलन

जस्तीकृत इस्पात की श्रृंखलानुमा बाड़ पर लगाने कीजाली

63. 6313369

2001/12.

04266

लॉकर, बैडसाइड अस्पताल में उपयोग के लिए

ए.एम. टैक्नोलॉजिस 206 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया फेज 2 पंचकूला

2001/11

64. 9313470

00781

बिब टेप और रोक वालव

84 सत्यम इंटरप्राइजिज 200ग्लोबकॉलोनी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जालंधर 144 004

65. 9313571

2001/12

03854

घरेलूऔर समान प्रयोजन हेतु स्विच

बसन्त इंटरप्राइजिज प्लॉट नं. 26 गुरू नानक कॉम्पलेक्स, बस्ती बावा खेल कपूरथला रोड, जालंधर

66. 9313672

2002/01

01659

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

लॉयल लेमिनेटस प्रा. ( इंडिया ) एससीओ 34 सेक्टर 26-डी चण्डीगढ़

67. 9313773

2002/10

01879

धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइपफिटिंग

वीनसस्टील इंडस्ट्रीज 144-145 उद्योग नगर, फोकल प्वाइंट , जालंधर

2001/12

68. 9313874

08112

43ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड

सीमेंट

एशियन सीमेंट 12, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया एक्सटेंशन कटुआ (जे एण्ड के)

69. 9313975

2001/12

लिन्डेन पाउडर

14833

2000 कनोरिया केमीकल्स एण्ड इंडस्ट्रिीजलि. , रेणूकूट जिला सोनभद्रा ( उ.प्र. )

70. 9314068

2001/12

14834

2000

लिन्डेन भुरकन पाउडर

कनोरिया केमीकल्स एण्ड इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , रेणूकूट जिला सोनभद्रा ( उ.प्र. ) [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8,2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

2186

2002/01

71. 9314169

कीर्तिस्पन पाइप्स वी-सिद्धीपुर समीप- हनुमान मंदिर मुण्डेला रोड, बहादुर गढ़, जिला झज्जर

2002/01

72. 9314270

रिलायबल इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव गदईपुर आलंधर

2002/01

73. 9314371

आस्कोस्विचगियर्स प्रा. लि. पटेल नगर जालंधर रोड कपूरथला-144601

2002/01

74. 9314472

स्वातिस्टोरवेल (प्रा. ) लि. , 44और 45 इंड. एरिया, सेक्टर 1 परवानू

2002/01

75. 9314573

शिप स्विचगियर्स ( इंडिया ) लि. 23, बसंत नगर सोडल रोड, जालंधर-144004

2002/01

76. 9314674

00458

पूर्वकलित कंकरीट पाइप

01879

धातुवर्ण्य ढलवांलोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

08828

विद्युत सहायकांग - घरेलूऔर ऐसे ही संस्थापनों के लिए अति- धारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

13487

सिंचाई उपस्कर सर्जक

03828

विद्युत सहायकांग- घरेलूऔर ऐसे ही संस्थापनों के लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

02046

सजावटी थर्मोसेटिंग संश्लिष्ट रेजिनबद्ध परतदार चादरें

कात्यानी केमटेक (इंडिया)

गाँव कुरौवाला बरवाला रोड,

डेराबस्सीजिला पटियाला

2002/01

77. 9314775

बॉमर लॉरी एण्ड कं. लि. मार्केटिंग काम्पलेक्स पीओ पानीपत रिफाइनरी गाँव बहोली पानीपत

2002/01

78. 9314876

असम वुड एण्ड एलाइड प्राडक्टस गाँव मकराबपुर पी ओ उद्यमगढ़ जगाधरी

2002/01

79. 9314977

0178301

बन्दसिरे वाले बड़े ड्रम भाग 1 ग्रेड ए ड्रम

03003

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

08828

मेक्सस्विचगियर्स प्रा. लि. ,

9वांकिमी पठानकोट रोड

जालंधर

2002/01

80. 9315070

चोपड़ा ब्रॉदर्स डी-60 स्पोर्टस एण्ड सर्जिकल गुडस कॉम्पलेक्स, कपूरथला रोड जालंधर-144 021

2001/12

81. 9315171

विद्युत सहायकांग धरेलूऔर ऐसे ही संस्थापनों के लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

2000

14846

जल कल प्रयोजन के लिए स्लूस वाल्व

09974 01

उच्च दाम को सोडियम वाष्प लैम्प

अस्त्रलाइटिंग लि. ,

बल्लोपुर हंडेसरा रोड,

लालरू जिला

पटियाला

2002/01

82. 9315272

01879

धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइप फिटिंग

आकल एग्रीकल्चरल इंडस्ट्रीज,

वाई पास लाम्बा पिंड, जालंधर

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

2187 2

83. 9315373

2002/01

01879

धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के

पाइपफिटिंग

चड्डाइंडस्ट्रीज वीपीओ रणधावा मासन्दा एडज्योनिंग फोकल प्वाइंट जालंधर शहर

2002/01

84. 9315373

02039 01

बाइसिकिल और साइकिल

रिक्शा के लिए इस्पात की

नलिकाएँ

एवॉन साइकल्स लि. , जी. टी. रोड, धनधारी कलौं लुधियाना

85. 9315575

2002/01

01879

धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहेके

पाइप फिटिंग

अम्बिका मैन्यूफेक्चरिंग गाँव गदईपुर, जालंधर शहर

86. 9315676

2002/01

01879

धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के

पाइप फिटिंग

नन्दा इंडस्ट्रीज, सी-16 इडं . फोकल प्वाइंट जालंधर

87. 9315777

2002/01

08249

जिंक सल्फेट हैपटाहाइड्रेट

कृषि ग्रेड

हरिओम फर्टिलाइजर प्रा. लि. , एफ-30 साइट नं. 2 इंडस्ट्रियल ऐस्टेट, उन्नाव

88. 9315878

2002/01

14543

98 प्राइम न्यूटीन्टग्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , गाँव भाट्टियान बेट, जी टी रोड, लुधियाना

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

89. 9315979

2002/01

00458

पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट पाइप

(प्रबलन सहित और रहित)

धौलाधार कंक्रीट वर्क्स वीपीओ सिद्धपुर सिद्धबारी तहः धर्मशाला, जिला कॉगडा

90. 9316072

2002/01

10775

बॉडीलेवल हीयरिंग एड

आर्टिफिशियल लिम्बस मैन्यू जी.टी. रोड़ रोड कानपुर-208016

91. 9316173

2002/01

01341

इस्पात के कब्जे

92 गुरुचरण एक्सपोर्टस ( इंडिया) इंडस्ट्रियल डव. कालोनी बाई पास जालंधर

92. 9316274

2002/01

अल्प वोल्टता स्विचगियर

13947 03

93 आस्कोस्विचगियर्स प्रा.लि. पटेल नगर जालंधर रोड, कपूरथला

2002/01

93. 9316375

00458

पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट पाइप

( प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

जय किसान कंक्रीट पाइप उद्योग 7, घाटिया ब्राह्मण इटावा (यूपी. )

2002/01

94. 9316476

01879

धातुवर्ध्य ढलवां लोहे के पाइप

फिटिंग

आर. वी. मेलिएबल्स बैक साइड फोकल प्वांइट एक्सटेंशन गोदइपुर, जालंधर- 144-004

2002/02-

95. 9316577

01783 02

बन्दसिरे वाले बड़े ड्रम

डिप्टी ड्रम्स (प्रा. ) लि. मण्डापाण्डे, रामपुर रोड, मुरादाबाद-244 001 [PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2188

00458

2002/01

96. 9316678

पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट पाइप ( प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

गुरु मानक पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज गाँव इस्लामाला, तह. फजिलका, मालआउट रोड , रक्बा चाहलानवाला जिला फिरोजपुर

01165

दूध पाउडर

2002/01

97. 9316779

करनाल मिल्क फूड्स लि. , 134कि. मी. स्टोन जी. टी. रोड, दादुपुर करनाल 132 001

0709801

2002/01

9316880

98.

अनुप्रस्थ जुड़े हुए पॉलीइथाईलीन विद्युतरोधी ताप स्थापी ढके केबल

अनराज केबल इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा. ) लि. , प्लॉट नं. 57 और 58 फेस 1 एमआईई बहादुरगढ़ 124 507

00427

वांछित रंग के शुष्क

2003/01

99. 9316981

डिस्टैम्पर

सूर्या इंडस्ट्रीज 136-140/84, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , फेस 1 चण्डीगढ़

05312 01

2002/01

9317074

100.

घरेलूकार्यों के लिए स्विंग चैक रिफ्लक्स वाल्व

जे एस इंडस्ट्रीज, एस -141 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जालंधर

00303

101. 9317175

1 सामान्यप्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

यूनिवर्सल वूड स्टील इंडस्ट्रीज प्लॉट नं. सी -1 फेस 1 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया सास नगर मोहाली

2000

01610

घरेलूसिलाई मशीन

2002/01

102. 9317276

सी. आर. औलक एण्ड संस लि. , 426 इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया-ए, लुधियाना

03564

द्रवचालित डोर क्लोजर

2002/01

9317377

103.

सरप्रीत हाइड्रोलिक्स 573 इंडस्ट्रियल फोकल प्वाइंट फेस 9 सास नगर मोहाली

05410

सीमेंट रंग रोगन

2002/01

104. 9317478

मूनलाइट पेंट एण्ड एलाइड इंडस्ट्रीज रामपुरा रोड, गाँव चिट्टाकलाँ जी.टी. रोड अमृतसर

01417

105. 9317579

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

धीर दी हट्टी ज्वेलर्स ( आर ) धीर टॉवर गवर्न. कॉलेज रोड सिविल लाइन्सलुधियाना

01417

106. 9317680

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स जेवर एस सी ओ 821 एनएसी चंडीगढ़ कालका रोड, चण्डीगढ़

01566

2002/01

107. 9317781

कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए सख्त कर्षित इस्पात तार बस्त्र

एप्पल बेल्डमेश इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव जटोला पी ओ ऑचघाट जिला सोलन 173 223 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

2189 1 2

108. 9317882

2002/01

04948

सामान्य उपयोग के लिए वेल्डकृत इस्पात तार वस्त्र

एप्पल वेल्डमेश इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव जटोला पी ओ ऑचघाट जिला सोलन 173 223

109. 9317983

03650

सम्मिश्र पात्रर्व कटिंग पिलर

ओशो टूल्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , गाँव जंडीयाल चण्डीगढ़ रोड, लुधियाना

-2002/02

110. 9318076

12701

पानी के भण्डार हेतु प्लास्टिक टंकी

अरिहंत प्लास्ट 58-बी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , मेहातपुरजिला उना

111. 9318177

01592

एस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट के दाव पाइप

एक्मे एस्बेस्टॉस पाइप्स प्रा. लि. अतुल कम्पाउंड ननहई, आगरा

112. 9318278

03854

घरेलूऔर समान कार्यों के के लिएस्विच

संजय इलैक्ट्रिकल्स प्रा. लि. , 18, संतोखपुरा होशियारपुर रोड, जालंधर

113. 9318379

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

श्रीराम वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, समीप रेलवे क्रॉसिंग, वीपीओ पनसारा यमुनानगर 135 001

114. 9318480

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

शिवम वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, राठौर रोड, गाँव जोरियान यमुनानगर 135 001

115. 9318581

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु पलाईवुड 000303

शिवम वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, राडौर रोड , गाँव जोरियान यमुनानगर 135 001

116. 9318682

02202 01

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस फोर प्रकारे ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह युक्त पल्ले

अमित डेकोरेटिव प्लाईवुड गाँव रामपुर पोस्ट खरखोदा, औचंदी बॉर्डर समीप सैदपुर चौक जिला सोनीपत

00277

92 117. 9318783

जस्तीकृत इस्पात की चद्दरें

वर्धमान इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , जी. टी. रोड, गाँव बेओप्रोर शम्भूराजपूरा जिला पटियाला

118. 9318884

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

90 अविनाश एग्रो प्रा. लि. , गाँव शाहपुर खन्ना से अम्लौह रोड, जिला फतेहगढ़ साहिब

00303

89 119. 9318985

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

अविनाश एग्रो प्रा. लि. , गाँव शाहपुर खन्ना से अम्लौह रोड, जिला फतेहगढ़ साहिब

120. 9319078

01328

परतचड़ी सजावटी प्लाइवुड

अविनाश एग्रो प्रा. लि. , गाँव शाहपुर खन्ना से अम्लौह रोड जिला फतहेगढ़ साहिब

1344GI/2004-3 2190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MAY 8, 2004 VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

[ PART -H Sec. 3 ( ii) ]

1 2

चोपड़ा ब्रॉदसी

121.9319179-2002/02

09084

05312

घरेलू कायों के लिए स्विंग

चैकारिफ्लक्स वाल्व

डी-60 एसएसजी काम्पलेक्स

कपूरथला रोड,

जालंधर 144021

छापोर्टलैंड पीजीलाना सीमेंट 01489 01 2002/01

122. 9319280

एशियन सीमेंट

गाँव बाघोरी सितारगंज

डिला यू.एस, नगर

01659

123. 9319381

ब्लॉकबोर्ड

जीएमजी प्लाईवुड (प्रा. ) लिए

गाँव कामीमाजरा पीओ शादीपुर

खजूरी सेक

यमुनानमूर:135-001

79 124. 9319482

ग्रैनटेक इंडिया लि.

02052

पशुओं के लिए मिश्रित आहार

тезници

वीपीओ सुधेबाल

जिला लुधियाना

11226

सीधे संचर्कित तले के साथ

अशोक इंटरनेशनल

125. 9319583

ई साइटसी"

चमड़े के प्सुरक्षरजूते

यूपीएसआईडीसी

सिकन्दरा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया,

सिकन्दरा, आगरा 282 007

अशोक इंटरनेशनल

126. 9319684

4-1786

चमड़े के सुरक्षा बूट और 105000198901ABTEC

जूते भागमाखनिकों के लिए

ई-84 साइट " सी "

यूपीएसआईडीसी

2009-05

सिन्दूरा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, प्राणे

सिकन्दरा , आगरा 282 007ায়

11501

86 127. 9319785

कृषि प्रयोजनों के लिए साफ

होण्डासील पॉवर प्रॉडक्टस लि.

मोनोसैट

जाजे पानी के

जीपीओ भिम्बाला वाया

এক পিচ

১০ ১০০০০

763148

(अकार

पॉटलैंड पोंजीलाना सीमेंट 01489 01 128. 9319886

मेट्रो सीमेंट्सी. लि.

हाँ लायन तहसील तावरूकी

एं कि

तहसील नूह गुडगाँव

13334 01 129. 9319987

स्पेशिएलिटीलाई धुषितधूम पाउडर

पारूल फूड्स

2015000

ecaro

(प्रा) तिको

166-67 किमी स्टोन

खानपुर कोलियन

136 131

२४ ९९ ८६ ९.९ १

01165

130. 9320063

पारूल

फूलूसास्पेशिएनिकटका গাঁ

(प्रा) लि.

80810

जी.टी. रोड़ी उए प्रिए शानजी

जिकिमी, स्टोन

हॉकि

खानपुर इंडियन

रूल की हर

जिला कुरूक्षेत्र 136 131 [ भार्ग खण्ड 3 (li ) ]

भारत की राजपत्र मई ४०० /वैशाख18/1606

ATTESA SHT

1 2

Γ 131. 9320164

2002/02 )

00458-005 Fasistesar

पूर्व उचित कंक्रीट प्राइम (प्रबलन सहित औएरहित)

मंडल, गांव सक्ता खेडा तह. मंडी, डबवाली सिरसा (हरियाणा) श्री गुरुजनक पादक ग्राम उद्योग

1272

2005.05

EPS .

132. 9320265

01328

की सत्राची,लघुड

अलखानन्दोप्लाईकुछ इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा. ) लि., ( TE गाँव रामविहार कॉलोनी खजूरी रोड़, यमुनानगर -135 001

133. 9320366

मंगला इंटरप्राइविज

पैकेजबन्द्र पेय जलमैकेज 14543

98 २५१इंड एरिया, फेस १

3005-05

बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल AURSIN

के अलावा

134. 9320467

2002/01

00427

वांछित रंग के।शुष्का डिस्टैम्पर

من

61358

मूनलाईट पैठएण्ड एलाइड इंडस्ट्रीज, रामपुरा रोड मेषजिस्य कलाँ अवसर

starsee apr 135: 9320568

14543

पैौजय म्क पैथी मला ( पैकेज

98 शिव गंगा नेचुरल मिनरल वॉटर कं. ,

01932

के अलाना हरि

5005105

. बटाला-143 505

عود ملكة المتدارك عياد

136. 9320669

भिवानी इंटरप्राइजिज,

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु साईवुड 00303

को 26 सवनी मंत्री होलीका प्रस्टिक

यमुनानगर-135 0018

137. 9320770 *2002/02

43ग्रेड साधारण पोटलैंड सीमेंट 08112

89 $8000

يو نيك ولحام إليه

2015005

विक्रम भटिंडा सीमेंट ग्राइंडिंग মুক্তির বাঁন ভীরু। সोहमत, पीओ रामपुरा फुल्छनिक्रिडा 111 हमला एस 8108

138. 9320871

विक्रम भटिंडा सीमेंट ग्राइंडिंग

01489 01

91 08

عندالبركة الملكية

3003:09

यूमिक मीच संख्या मोहीस, पीओ रामपुरा फुल, भटिंडाधड 111 সাতদিনি এস ৪১৮ ফড়ি

139. 9320972

स्वास्तिक पाइप्स लि.

03589

2001

पानी, मलाल के लिए

गाँवकोटवन कोसीकलाँ,

97 किमी स्टोन एनएच-2,

3003103

६८. १८८ ९ ० उदासी मथुरा शरी

1210355198 तहसील बरो मधुशाला पृष्मकाली

140. 9321065

08275

सूक्ष्मदर्शी के लिए द्विनेत्रीकाएं

रेडिकल इन्स्ट्रूमेंट्स

1259355500

frowקול,ליכןקית

अम्बाला छावनी-133 006 123, इंडस्ट्रियल

141. 8321166

03686

502002/070 रेडिकल इन्स्ट्रूमेंद्र

विद्यार्थियों हेतु प्रयोग ट्राइप

5005.08

123, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टे

सूक्ष्मदर्शी न्याि

अम्बाला छावनी-133006 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8, 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2192

08249

2002/03

142. 9321267

जिंक सल्फेट हैपटाहाइड्रेट कृषिग्रेड

महेश केमीकल एण्ड एलाइड इंडस्ट्रीज, 24 इंड. एरिया-3 सिरसा

14543

143. 9321368

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज- बन्दप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

दीप एक्वाप्रोसेसर्स शाहजहाँपुर रोड, फरीदपुर, जिला बरेली

14543

144. 9321469

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेज बन्दप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

न्यूऐज एक्वा प्रा. लि. , बडखल, फरीदाबाद-121 011

02202 01

145. 9321570

ओबेरॉय वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, एम-15, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, यमुनानगर-135 001

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड सतह मुक्त पल्ले

01328

परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

146. 9321671

राजन स्टील, 21-22 इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, फेस 1 , यमुनानगर-135 001

01328

परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

147. 9321772

नीलगिरि वुड क्राफ्ट, गाँव जोरियम , रदौर रोड, यमुनानगर

14543

148. 9321873

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेज बन्दप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

कश्मीर हाइजेनिक्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , वीपीओ गोबिन्दपुरा बीबीवांला रोड, समीप केनल रेस्ट हाउस, भटिंडा

02082

149. 9321974

पानी गर्म करने के भंडारण किस्मके हीटर

दुर्गा मैन्यूफेक्चरिंग कं. , 87/8 , भन्नाना पूर्वा काल्पी रोड , समीप जरीबचौकी, कानपुर

01237

2002/03

150. 9322067

सीमेंट कंक्रीट की फर्श बिछाने वाली टाइलें

दरबारी फ्लोरिंग टाइल्स, शेड नं. 68, फेस 2 , मोतीलाल नेहरू इंजीनियरिंग कॉलेज , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, तायरगंज, इलाहाबाद

09537 03

151. 9322168

विद्युत संस्थापन के लिए कंडयूट भाग 3 कंडयूट विद्युतरोधक सामग्री के लिए दृढ सांद्र कंडयूट

दुर्गा इंटरप्राइजिज, सभीप सोब्ती गैस नूरपुर रावाली पठानकोट रोड, जालंधर

04003 01

2002/03

152.9322269

पाइप रिंच भाग 1 सामान्य प्रयोजन

इंदर इंडस्ट्रीज, बस्ती माठ, इन्दर नगर, जालंधर

04003 02

2002/03

153. 9322370

पाइप रिंच भाग 2

इंदर इंडस्ट्रीज, बस्तीभाठ, इन्दर नगर, जालंधर [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

2193 भारत का राजपत्र : [ 8 , 2004/पैसावा 18, 1926

1 2

7 154. 9322471

2002/03

02713 01

शिरोपरि पावर लाइनों के लिए इस्पातके गोल खंभे

सनस्टील फेब, पीओ गुटकर, जिला मंडी (हि.प्र.)

155. 9322572

2002/03

09890

सामान्य प्रयोजन बाल वाल्व

सन्तवाल्व्स (प्रा) लि. जी.टी. रोड, बाईपास जालंधर-144004

156. 9322673

01989 01

चमड़े के सुरक्षा बूट और जूते भाग 1 खनिकों केलिए

यश इंटरप्राइजिज, ई-124, साइट सी, सिकन्द्रा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, यूपीएस आईडीसी, आगरा-282007

157. 9322774

11226

सीधे संचकित तले के साथ चमड़े के सुरक्षा जूते

यश इंटरप्राइजिज ई-124, साइट सी, सिकन्द्रा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, यूपीएस आईडीसी, आगरा-282 007

158. 9322875

05852

पादांगुलि हेतु संरक्षी इस्पात टोपी

एस. एस. सेफ्टी प्रॉडक्टस, 126 बी , कॉ-आपरेटिव इंड. ऐस्टेट, दादा नगर, 'कानपुर

159. 9322976

2002/01

11006

फ्लेश बैंक एरेस्टॉर

दिकामरूप इंडस्ट्रियल गैसेस लिमिटेड, डीजल लोकोमोटिव टाउनशिप, वाराणसी-221004

160. 9322069

01237

सीमेंट कंक्रीट की फर्श बिछाने वाली टाइलें

जयसवाल टाइल्स, जंगल बेनीमाधव नं. 2, मोहरीपुर, गोरखपुर-273 007

161. 9323170

बाल वाल्व

09890

81 डिसेन्ट इंटरनेशनल, सेल्स( इंडिया) , भगत सिंह कालोनी, समीप- आर.जे. कोल्ड स्टोरेज , जालंधर-144008

162. 9323271

2002/03

43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट 08112

89 आर. ए. सीमेंट प्रा लि. , गाँव मौहर, जिला फतेहपुर

163. 9323372

2002/03

13334 02

मलाई युक्त दूध पाउडर

इंडस्ट्रियलप्रोग्रेसिव (इंडिया) लि. गाँव अधवनपुर, जी.टी. रोड, तहसील पलवल , जिला फरीदाबाद

99 164. 9323473

02202

लकड़ी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर (ठोस कोर प्रकार )

अग्रवाल टिम्बर प्रॉडक्टस, डब्ल्यू-१ , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, यमुनानगर-35001

165. 9323574

2002/03

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड 00303

अनुराग डेकोरेटिव्स, गाँव जोरियान, यमुनानगर-135001 [PART II SHC 3(il) ) 2194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MAY 8 / 2004/ VAISARONA 10, 1926

1 2

0185900

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

2002/03

166. 9323675

(237)

अनुराग डेकोरीटब्स गाँव जौरियान यमुनानगर 135 001

0086400

2002/03

167. 9323776

1100 वोल्ट तक का कार्यकारी वोल्टता हैतुम्योवीसी रार्थित

केबल POOPA-

आइकॉन वॉयर्स एण्ड केबल्स इंडस्ट्रीज 27-ए, फोकल प्वाइंट, रामपुरा 40401

08112

वडग्रेडे सीधारणपोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

2002/03

168. 9323877

सम्रीट सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज, गाँव गंदौन ( सुनाम ) , जिला संगरूर

00798900

जल कल प्रयोक्षमा हेतु 肥,

169. 9323978

लालर्सन इंजी. चवले, 1052 आउटसाइड इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जालंधर 144 004

ब्लॉक बोर्ड

01659

170. 9324071

2002/03 ग्रीन वेली प्लाईवुड लि. , 29 किमी स्टोन रोहतका देहकोरा रेलवे स्टेशन शैर्ड, गाँव रोहड, जिला झज्जर

01669.000

2002/03

171. 9324172

यूनीक वुड इंडस्ट्रीम गाँव जोरियन, यमुनानगर ।

89 2002/03

00303

172. 9324273

40 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

000000

यूनीक वुड इंडस्ट्रीज, साँव कोरितान, सिदौर पोख यमुना नगर 135: 001 मीनाक

00778

173. 9324374

एस.के. मेटल इंडस्ट्रीज ( रजि ) , ई-60, इंडस्ट्रियल, स्यिा जालंधर 144 004

ग्लोब और लैक बालाही (ফজীয়)ফোন

2000

14834

सिडेन पुरक पाउडर

174. 9324475

इंडिया पेस्टीसाइडस लिमिटेड ई-17 से 23 यूपीएसडीआईसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , देवा रोड,

01328

2002/03

175. 9324576

परतावढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

भवानी इंटरप्राइजिज ओ-26, सब्जी मंडी के पीछे इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, यमुनानगर 135 001

00269

176. 9324677

3 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड

मेंट

सिरमौर एलाइड एण्ड केमीकल इंडस्ट्रीज (प्रा) लि गाँव मुगलाँवाला, करतारपुर पीओ राजबन, पौंटा साहिब जिलासिरमौर

08249

2002/03

177. 9324778

जिंक सल्फेट हैप्ट्राइडेंट

कृषि प्रेड २६

डीडी एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , 29-सी किंचलू नगर 'लुधियाना 141 003 भाखपुर ( ii) ]

180926 ISAD JHT

de12195 1 2

S 2002/03 जात्र केमीकल्स,

01061

टाइप

178. 9324879 एस

रोगाणुनाशी

लोफिनोलिक

द्रव

पार्क, गोहाना रोड,

प्लॉट नं . 3431 समीप- संजय पानीपत 132103

979.93249802002/03

5094151

025८६६.९९

सिंचाई तंत्र के छिड़काव युभी के लिए पॉलीयकइलीन पाइप

100 081 for paye

माल्या फास्टनर्स ( प्रा ) लि. , पिठ इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , सेक्टर -1 , परवा

3180.9325073

8097 2002/

फिलोलिक टाइम रोगाणुनाारत

५९८ STCOSER

061

हिमेला केपीलाल वर्क्स, असजी नं , मौजा मधुयादि वाराणसी

ਸਾਜਿਸ ਤਹਿ ਲਿਲੀ

181. 9325174.

2002/03

01489 01

लिपोर्टलैंडपोज़ोलाना सीमेंट

91 पांगली सीमेंट कं. (प्रा ) गाँव गाँवसगढ़ रोहन रोड,

ROSTO

2002/03

182. 9325275

14543

98 Se

एसोसिएटिडमिनरल्स, 43इंडट्रियल कालोनी , नैनी इलाहाबाद

1828339200

६०/७००८

पैकेजबन्द्र पेय जल (पैकेज बन्द प्राकृतिक मिनीस्खा फूल- पोभिलावा)

183. 9325376

2002/03

01239

मृदु इस्पतिकी मालियाँ नलिकाकार सामग्रियाँ तथा

स्वास्तिक पाइप लि. , गाँव कोटवन कोशीकलां,

एनएचपिटवा इस्पात की

3005103

гваasce aer

अन्य फिटिंग 2008

27 मील पत्थर, दिल्ली मथुरा रोड़, जिला मथुरा

184. 9325477

शारदा मेटल्स,

00778

जल कल प्रयोजन हेतु गेट,

SETASER TO

६०/७००८

एक्सटेंग्लोब और बैंक वाल्व

ई-27, फोकल प्वाइंट जालंधर

185. 9325578

2002/03

00458

पुर्वदलित कंक्रीट पाइप

88 यूना स्पन पाइप (प्रा )(प्रा) लि.,

इंडस्ट्रियल एरियानल सहित और रहित ९ ००८

गाँव तहलीवाल, जिल्ला सूम

(हि. प्र. )

علىتكلفة العالم اسلك الدرمكة

186. 9325679

2002/03

96600

79 राजदीप बिजनस काम्बाइन एक फेज छोटी एसी मोटर

5003104

3 जी, एन.आई. टी. , फरीदाबाद

187.9325780

11951

87 2002/03

डेजर्ट कूलर के लि पुर के लिए पंपसेट

राजदीप, ब्रिजन्स काम्बाइन, 3 जी, एन.आई. टी. , फरीदाबाद

188. 9325581

88 2002/04 शिवा उधोग,

बन्द सिर वाले बड़े ड्रम

020

015009783

शव विहार, सौनीपत रोड

सावला, मला राहतक

দরুনীমার

189.9325982

2002/03-

01659.

ब्लॉक बोर्ड..

बरेली प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , गाँव पाँच देवरिया, पीओ भोजीपुरा

बरेली

2002/03

190. 9326075

00303.

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

बरेली प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , गाँव पाँच देवरिया, पीओ भोजीपुरा बरेली 2196

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2002/03

191. 9326176

ए आर पॉलिमर्स प्रा . लि. , बी-29, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मालवन फतेहपुर 2002/04

192. 9326277

तायलज्वेलर्स, लखदाता बाजार, जम्मूतवी 180001

2002/03

193. 9326378

दिहनुमान विवर्स प्रॉडक्टस, कॉ-आप इंड. सोसाइटी लि. पीओ दिल्ली रोड समीप सेक्टर 12 , सोनीपत 131001 194. 9326479

वेद प्रकाश मित्तल एंड संस, डब्ल्यू-१, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया यमुनानगर

2002/03

195. 9326580

मोहनफूडस लि. , गाँव कुंजारामपुर रोड, पोंटा साहिब

2002/03

196. 9326681

00303

सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

01417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

00758

हथकरघे से बनी सूती अवशोषी निर्जमित पट्टी

96 परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड 01328

01165

दूध पाउडर

04947

अग्निशामक यंत्रों में प्रयोग के लिएगैस कार्टिज

चावला फायर प्रोटेक्शन इंजीनियर्स,

2095 एम आई ई

बहादुरगढ़ ।

2002/03

197. 9326782

अनुपम होम एप्पलायसेंस, गाँव खेरी त्रिलोक पुर रोड, कला अम्ब नाहन, जिला सिरमौर

2002/03

198. 9326883

जे पी सीमेंट ग्राइंडिंग यूनिट, गाँव सादवा खुर्द परगाना अरायल, तहसील बारा , जिला इलाहाबाद

2002/04

199. 9326984

जी. एस. एजेन्सी प्लॉट नं. 46 , इंड. एरिया, फेस -1 , चण्डीगढ़ 160 001

2002/04

200. 9327077

स्टैण्डर्ड इलैक्ट्रिकल्स, डी-116फेस 7, इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, मोहाली

01238

हरिकेन लालटेन

01489 01

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

08828

विद्युत सहायक अंग- घरेलू और ऐसे ही संस्थापनों के लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

[ सीएमडी-1/13: 11 ]

एस. के. चौधरी , उप महानिदेशक 2197 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumer Affairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 26th April , 2004

S. O. 1115. In pursuance of sub -regulation (5) ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Title ofthe Standards ISNo. Part Sec. Year SL Licence No.

No.

Name & Address ofthe Party

Operative Date (Year/Month)

1 2

01660 01

82 2001/10

1 9307172

Aluminium Utensils, Cooking Table, Serving Storing and Baking Untensiles

Bimal Aluminiums Pvt. Ltd. , 31-A Shiv Shankar Nagar behind Oriental Insurance Co.,Court Road Jagadhri

14103

94 2001/10

2. 9307273

Quality Pumps Pvt . Ltd. , 1B/A Dada Nagar Kanpur

Deepwell, Handpump Components Mild Steel , Specification

2000

14846

2001/10

3. 9307374

Sachdeva Metal Works, C-33 Ext. Focal Point Jalandhar

Sluice Valve for Water WorksPurposes (50 to 1200 MM Size) Specification

02062

2001/10

4. 9307475

Steel for General Structural Purposes Specification

Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills Sidco Lane No. 2 Industrial ComplexBari Brahmna Jammu

00303

2001/10

5. 9307576

Plywood forGeneral Purposes

Lumbertech (P) Ltd. , 57 Km Stone Delhi Rohtak Road, Vill. , Ismaila Distt.: Rohtak

01659

BlockBoards

2001/10

6. 9307677

Lumbertech (P) Ltd. , 57 Km Stone Delhi Rohtak Road, Vill., Jamaila

Distt.: Rohtak

00710

2001/10

7. 9307778

Marine Plywood

GlaxyPlaywood Industries (P) Ltd. Vill ., Kami Majra Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar

01328

96 2001/10

8. 9307879

VeneeredDecorative Plywood

Glaxy Playwood Indst. (P)Ltd. Vill. , Kami Majra Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar

1344 G1/2004-4 2198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/ VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

003

9. 9307980

2001/10

Plywood for General Purposes

GMG Plywood (P) Ltd. , Vill. , Kami Majra Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar

10 9308073

2001/11

Portable Pinematic Sanders 09828

96 Sard (P) Ltd. , PlotNo. 45 , Sector 23 , Faridabad

11. 9308174

2001/10

Power Threshers

09020

79 Gobind Industries , Dashahara Bagh , Barabanki

12. 9308275

2001/11

03564

Hydraulically Regulated DoorClosers- Specification

ShivaEnterprises Shed No. 10 Citco ComplexHallomajra Chandigarh

2001/11

13. 9308376

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

Shiva Shambhu Plywood (P) Ltd. , VPO Buria Distt.: Yamunanagar

14. 9308477

2001/11

Block Boards

01659

90 Shiva Shambhu Plywood (P)Ltd. VPO Buria Distt.:Yamunanagar

01879

87 15. 9308578

2001/10

Malleable Cast Iron PipeFittings

B.S. Steel Industries Subhash Nagar Indl . Area Jalandhar

00278

78 16. 9308679

2001/10

Galvanized Steel Barbed Wire

Suneet Metallics Kandaghat Distt. : Solan

02721

79 17. 9308780

2001/10

Galvanized Steel Chain Link Fence Fabric

Suneet Metallics KandaghatDistt.: Solan

08472

18. 9308881

2001/10

Pump Regenerative or Clear, ColdWater

Leader Pumps & Motors , D-1/ 117, Sanjay Colony . Sector 23, Faridabad

19. 9308982

2001/10

00278

Galvanized Steel Barbed Wire

Apple Weldmesh Industries , Vill . Jatoli P O: Oachghat Distt.: Solan

2001/11

02553 01

90 0. 9309075

Safety Glass

J.K. Toughened Glass Works (Regd.), PlotNo. 27 Lamba Pind Chowk , Behind Chara Mandi , New Indl . Estate Jalandhar- 144004

00632

78 21 9309176

2001/11

Gamma-BHC (Lindane) EC

BharatOrganics , A-2/3 UPSIDC Industrial Area , Sandila Hardaoi

08944

2001/11

78 22. 9309277

Chlorpyrifos EC

BharatOrganics , A-2/3UPSIDC Industrial Area, Sandila Hardaoi (U.P.) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2199

भारत का राजपत्र मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

1 2

2001/10

23. 9309378

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

AnilPlyBoard, Vill . Barnai Akhnoor Road, Jammu

24. 9309479

2001/11

Packaged Drinking Water 14543

Saro Plastics Pvt . Ltd. , 9, Hal Ancillary Estate, Ismailganj , Faizabad Road , Lucknow

25. 9309580

2001/11

00863

Handloom Cotton Bandage

The Hanuman Weaver's Product Co- op . Indl . Society Ltd. Delhi, Road Near Sector 12 Sonepat- 131001

26. 9309681

2001/11

03196 01

92 SKN Industries Ltd. , 21/18, 19, 22, 23 , 28/4 NH- 8 Jaipur-Highway Road, Vill.Malpura Dharuhera Distt.: Rewari

Welded Low Carbon Steel Cylinder exceeding 5 Litre Water Capacity forLow Pressure Liquefiable Gases

27. 9309782

2001/10

08978

WaterHeaters Electric Instantaneous

Tempoon India, Plot No. 198 , Sector 24, Faridabad

28. 9309883

2001/11

13428

PackagedNatural MineralWater

Alfa Aqua Associates , 7/1 Industrial Area, Rudrapur Distt.:U.S. Nagar-263153

29. 9309984

2001/11

00455

Portland Slag Cement

Chattan Cement Industries , SICOP Industrial Area, Kathua (J&K)-184102

30. 9310060

2001/11

00303

Plywood forGeneral Purposes

Hindustan Plywood Industries, Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar

31. 9310161

2001/11

02347

Domestic Pressure Cookers

M.K. Metal Industries F- 1 , Focal Point Extension Jalandhar

32. 9310262

2001/11

01656

Milk Cereal based Weaning Foods

Nutricia India Pvt . Ltd. , DairyComplex Kasganj Road, Etah-207001

07347

74 33. 9310363

2001/11

Performance of Small Size Spark

IndoGerman Agricultural Sprayer& Pressing Works G.T. Road Near Chand Cinema, Ludhiana- 141008

34. 9310464

2001/11

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Parvati Beverages Badkhal Extn. Badkhal , Faridabad- 121001

2001/11

35. 9310565

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

Classic Plywood Industries , Vill . , Damla Radaur Road , Yamunanagar [PART II SBC. 3( ii) )

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8, 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2200

1 2

2001/11

36. 9310666

01659

Block Boards

ClassicPlywood Industries ,

Vill. DamlaRadaur Road,

Yamunanagar

2001/11

37. 9310767

89 Plywood forGeneral 00303 Purposes

United Timber Works

Vill.Pansara Saharanpur

Road,

Yamunanagar

2001/11

38. 9310868

01659

BlockBoards

SuperPackers

NearOctroiPost No. 3 ,

RadaurRoad,

Yamunanagar

2001/11

39. 9310969

00303

Plywood forGeneral Purposes

SuperPackers

NearOctroi Post No. 3,

RadaurRoad,

Yamunanagar

2001/11

9311062

40.

DattMedi Products Ltd. 53-54, Roz KaMeo Indus- trial Area, Sohna, Gurgaon

2001/11

41. 9311163

00758

Handloom Cotton Gauze Absorbent, Non-Sterlized

09890

General Purposes Ball Valves

Lakshmi Metal Works

C-24, A Industrial Focal

Point, Jalandhar- 144004

2001/11

42. 9311264

EskaConstruction & Engineers Pvt. Ltd. G-2, Chinhat Industrial Area, DewaRoad, Lucknow

2001/11

43. 9311365

01237

Cement Concrete FlooringTiles

00694

PVC Insulated Cables

SurinderaEngg . Works

DhobianaRoad,

Bhatinda-151001

2001/11

44. 9311466

08978

Electric Instantaneous Water Heaters

Hindustan Engineering

Works,

3124, Industrial Area

Phase II,

Chandigarh

2001/11

45. 9311567

Jatindera K. Wires (Pvt.) Ltd.G.T. Road Chhanni P.O. Damtal Teh . Jndora Distt: Kangra-176403

2001/11

46. 9311668

00398 02

Alum . Conductors for Overhead Transmission Purposes

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Ultra Beverages Pvt. Ltd.

FCA-229, Mahna Road,

Ballabgarh, Faridabad

2001/11

47. 9311769

AmitDecorative Plywood Vill. Rampur P.O. Kharkhoda AuchandiBorder Near, SaidpurChowk Distt: Sonepat

2001/11

9311870

48.

01328

Veneered Decorative Plywood

02202 01

Wooden Flush Door Shutters

Kitply Industries Ltd.

Shahbad Road,

Rampur(U.P.)

2201

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2001/11

9311971

49.

10001

Constant Speed Com- pression Ignition (Diesel ) Engines for General Purposes (Upto 20 kW)

Rastriya Audhoyogic

Sansthan 9/99 , Jamuna

Bridge Station Road,

Agra-282006

2001/11

50. 9312064

StarHydraulics C-78 , Industrial Area Phase-VI , Sas Nagar

2001/11

51. 9312165

03564

Hydraulically Regulated DoorClosers

13334 01

Skimmed Milk Powder

Mahan Foods Ltd.

Vill . KunjaRampur Road

Poanta Sahib

2001/11

52. 9312266

01239 01

MildSteel Tubes , Tubulars

AvonCycles Ltd.

Steel Tube Division G.T.

Road Dhandari Kalan

Ludhiana

2001/12

53. 9312367

Hindustan Rubber Industries 19/2/1 (13-16) Vill . Pawty Hathwala Road, Samalkha (HR)-132101

2001/11

54. 9312468

Sadhna Cements Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. 1702 Barauli Kakawan Road, Bilhaur, Kanpur

2001/11

55. 9312569

Moonlight Paint & Allied Industries Rampura Road, Vill. Chitta Kalan G.T. Road, Amritsar- 143115

2001/12

56. 9312670

10908

Flexible Rubber Tubing

08112

43Grade OPC

00164

ReadyMixed Paint for RoadMarking

09537 03

Conduit for Electrical Installations

Amar Jyoti Pipe Industries

Bhucho Kalan Bhatinda

2001/11

57. 9312771

11501

Engine Monoset Pump

Shivas Industries

Jeoni Mandi

(Indra Mill Compound)

Agra

2001/12

58. 9312872

01891 01

Conveyor and Elevator Textiles

Neel Kanth Rubber Mills

Vill.Varyana

Kapurthala Road , Jalandhar

2001/12

59. 9312973

08112

43 Grade OPC

Jai Industries Adda Sarore

Bari Brahmna Jammu

(J&K)

2001/12

60. 9313066

00814

Covered Electrodes for Manual

Mahindra Electrodes

Bathinda Road Bhucho

Kalan Distt: Bhatinda

151101

2001/12

61. 9313167

Cemocrete Industries Vill. , Mubarikpur Near Power House Teh . Rajpura Distt: Patiala

2001/12

62. 9313268

13801

Chequered Cement ConcreteTiles

02721

Galvanized Steel Chain Link Fen

Apple Weldmesh Industries

Vill . Jatoli PO Oachghat

Distt: Solan

2202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

04266

67 2001/12

63. 9313369

Locker, Bedside for Hospital Use

A. M. Tehchnologies 206 Industrial Area Phase II Panchkula

84 64. 9313470

2001/11

BibTapsand stop Valves 00781

Satyam Enterprises 200Globe Colony Industrial Area Jalandhar- 144004

03854

2001/12

65. 9313571

Switches for Domestic and Similar Purposes

Basant Enterprises PlotNo. 26 Guru Nanak ComplexBasti Bawa Khel Kapurthala Road Jalandhar

01659

90 66. 9313672

2002/01

BlockBoards

Loyal Laminates (P) Ltd. Sco . 34 Sector 26 - D, Chandigarh

87 2001/10

67. 9313773

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

Venus Steel Industries 144-145 , Udyog Nagar Behind Focal Point Jalandhar

08112

43Grade OPC

2001/12

68. 9313874

Asian Cement 12 , Industrial Area Extension Kathua ( J& K)-184102

2000

14833

Lindane Wettable Powder

2001/12

69. 9313975

Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd. Renukoot Distt: Sonebhadra (UP)

2000 2001/12

70. 9314068

14834

LindaneDusting Powder

Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd. Renukoot Distt: Sonebhadra (UP)-231217

00458

2001/01

71. 9314169

Precast Concrete Pipes

Kirti SpunPipes V- SidipurNear Hanuman MandirMundela Road Bahadurgarh

Distt : Jhajjar

87 2001/01

72. 9314270

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

Reliable Industries Vill . Gadaipur Jalandhar

08828

2001/01

73. 9314371

Electrical Accessories- Circuit

Asco Swithgears Pvt . Ltd. Patel Nagar Jalandhar Road Kapurthala- 144601

13487

2001/01

74. 9314472

Irrigation Equipment- Emitters

Swati Storwel , (Pvt) Ltd. 44 and 45 IndI . Area Sector I Parwanoo

08828

2001/01

75. 9314573

ElectricalAccessories- Circuit

Ship Switchgears ( India) 23 Basant Nagar Sodal Road Jalandhar- 144004

02046

2001/01

76. 9314674

Decorative Thermosetting Synthetic Resin Bonded Laminated

Katyanai Chemtech (India) Ltd. Vill. Kuranwala Barwala Road Derabassi Distt : Patiala [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2203

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/ वैशाख 18, 1926

77. 9314775

2001/01

Balmer Lawrie& Co. Ltd. Marketing Complex PO Panipat Refinery Vill.Baholi Panipat 2001/01

78. 9314876

93 Drüms, LargeFixed Ends 01783 01

00303

89 Plywood forGeneral Purposes

Assam Wood and Allied

ProductsVill.Mukarabpur

PO Udhamgarh

Jagadhri

2001/01

79. 9314977

08828

96 Elettrical, Accessories- Circuit

Max Switchgears Pvt. Ltd.

9th KM Pathankot Road

Jalandhar

2002/01

80. 9315070

ChopraBrothers D-60 Sports & Surgical GoodsComplex KapurthalaRoad Jalandhar- 144021 81. 9315171

2001/12 Astra Lighting Ltd. Ballopur Handesra Road Lalru, Distt : Patiala 2002/01

82. 9315272

AkalAgricultural Indst. Bye Pass Lamba Pind, Jalandhar

2002/01

83. 9315373

Chadha Industries VPO Randhawa Masanda Adjoining Focal Point, Jalandhar City 2002/01

84. 9315474

14846

2000 Sluice Valve for Water WorksPurposes

009974 01

Sodium Vapour Lamp

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

87 Malleable Cast Iron Pipe 01879 Fittings

02039 01

91 Steel Tubes for Bicycle and Cycle

AvonCycles Ltd.

G.T. Road, Dhandari Kalan,

Ludhiana

2002/01

85. 9315575

AmbikaManufacturing Vill.Gadaipur, Jalandhar City

2002/01

86. 9315676

Nanda Industries C- 16, Indl. Focal Point, Jalandhar

2002/01

87. 9315777

Hariom Fertilizer Pvt . Ltd. F-30, Site No. 2 Industrial Estate, Unnao 2002/01

88. 9315878

PrineNutrientgs ( P) Ltd. , Vill. Bhattian Bet G.T. Road , Ludhiana

89. 9315979

2002/01

Dhauladhar Concrete Works VPO Sidhpur Sidhbari , Teh . Dharamshala , Distt . Kangra

2002/01

90. 9316072

Artificial Limbs Mfg . G.T. Road, Kanpur-208016 2002/01

91. 93161673

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

01879

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

08249

Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate, Agri .

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

00458

88 Precast Concrete Pipes

10775

Body Level Hearing Aids

01341

SteelButtHinges

GurcharanExports ( India)

Industrial , Dev, Colony, Bye

Pass Jalandhar

[PART II SBC. 3( ii) ] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8, 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2204

13947 03

2002/01

Low- Voltage Switchgear

92. 9316274

Asco Switchgears Pvt. Ltd. , PatelNagar, Jalandhar Road Kapurthala

00458

Precast Concrete Pipes

2002/01

93. 9316375

JaiKisan Concrete Pipe Uduog, 7, GhatiaBrahmaan Etawah(UP)

01879

2002/01

94. 9316476

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings

R.V. Malleables Back Side Focal Point Extn. Godeipur, Jalandhar- 144004

01783 02

Drums, Large FixedEnds

95. 9316577

Dipty Drums (Pvt .) Ltd. Munda Pandey, Rampur Road, Moradabad-244001

00458

Precast Concrete Pipes

2002/01

96. 9316678

Guru Nanak Pipe Industries Village Islamwala, Teh . Fazilka, Malout Road, Rakba, Chahlanwala, Distt. Ferozepur

01165

MilkPowder

2002/01

97. 9316779

KarnalMilk Foods Ltd. , 134 K.M. StoneG. T. Road, Dadupur, Kamal- 132001

07098 01

2002/01

98. 9316880

Crosslinked Polyethylene Insulated PVC Sheathed Cables

Anraj Cable Industries (p) Ltd. , Plot No. 57 and 58 Phase 1 Mie Bahadurgarh - 124507

00427

2002/01

99. 9316981

Distemper Dry Colour as Rfq.

Surya Industries 136-140/84, Industrial Area, Phase- 1 , Chandigarh

05312 01

2002/01

100. 9317074

Swing Check Type Reflux Valves

JayEss Industries S- 141 , Industrial Area, Jalandhar

00303

Universal Wood Steel

101. 9317175

Plywood for General Purposes

Industries Plot No. C- 1,. Phase- 1 , Industrial Area, SasNagar , Mohali

2000

01610

2002/01

102. 9317175

Household Sewing Machines

C. R. Auluck and Sons Ltd. 426, Industrial Area-A, Ludhiana

03564

2002/01

103. 9317377

Hydraulically Regulated Door, Closers

Sarpreet Hydraulics 573 , Industrial Focal Point, Phase - IX, Sas Nagar, Mohali

05410

Cement Paint

2002/01

104. 9317478

Moonlight Paint & Allied Industries , Rampura Road, Vill. Chitta Kalan ,G. T. Road, Amritsar

01417

105. 9317579

Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts Finess and Marking

Dhir Di Hatti Jewellers (R) Dhir Tower, Govt. College Road, Civil Lines , Ludhiana

01417

106. 9317680

Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artifacts Finess and Marking

M/sZever SCO. 821 , Nae Chandigarh Kalka Road, Chandigarh 2205

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1 2

107. 9317781

2002/01 AppleWeldmesh Industries Vill. Jatoli, P.O. Oachghat, Distt. Solan- 173223

2002/01

108. 9317882

Apple Weldmesh Industries Vill. Jatoli, P.O. Oachghat, Distt. Solan- 173223 109. 9317983

Osho Tools (P) Ltd. , Vill. Jandial , Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana 110. 9318076

Arihant Plast 58-B, Industrial Area, Mehatpur , Distt . Una 111. 9318177

ACME Asbestos Pipes Pvt . Ltd., Atul Compound Nunhai Agra

112. 9318278

SanjayElectricals Pvt. 18, Santokhpura Hoshiarpura Road, Jalandhar 113. 9318379

Shree Ram Wood Industries Near Railway Crossing VPOPansara, Yamunanagar- 135001 114. 9318480

Shivam Wood Industries Radaur Road, Vill. Jorian, Yamunanagar- 135001 115. 9318581

Shivam Wood Industries Radaur Road, Vill . Jorian, Yamunanagar- 135001 116. 9318682

AmitDecorative Plywood Vill. Rampur, Post Kharkhoda, Auchandi Border, Near Saidpur Chowk, Distt. Sonepat

117. 9318783

Vardhman Industries Ltd. , G. T. Road, Vill . Beopror , Shambhu Rajpura, Distt. Patiala

118. 9318884

Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd. Vill. Shahpur, Khanna to Amloh Road, Distt. Fatehgarh , Sahib 119. 9318985

Avinash Agro Pvt . Ltd. Vill . Shahpur Khanna to Amloh Road, Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib 120. 9319078

Avinash Agro Pvt . Ltd. , Vill. Shahpur Khanna to Amloh Road, Distt . Fatehgarh Sahib

1344GI/2004-5

01566

HARDC Drawn Steel Wire Fabric

04948

Welded Steel Wire Fabric for General use

03650

Combination side Cutting Pillers

12701

Polyrthylene Water StorageTank

01592

89 Asbestos Cement PressurePipes

00854

Switches for Domestic and similar purposes

00303

Plywood for General purposes

01659

BlockBoards

00303

Plywood forGeneral purposes

02202 01

WoodenFlush Door Shutters

00277

Galvanised Steel Sheets

01659

BlockBoards

00303

Plywood for General Purpose

01328

Veneered Decorative Plywood 2206

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : MAY 8, 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

1 2

121. 9319179

ChopraBrothers D-60, SSG Complex, Kapurthala Road, Jalandhar - 144021 122. 9319280

2002/01

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 5

05312 01

Swing Check Type Reflux Valves

01489 01

Portland Pozzolana Cement

Asian Cement

Vill. Baghori, Sitarganj ,

Distt. U.S. Nagar

123. 9319381

GMG Plywood (P) Ltd. , Vill.Kami Majra, P.O. Shadipur , Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar- 135001 124. 9319482

Graintec India Ltd. V.P.O. Budhewal, Distt. Ludhiana 125. 9319583

Ashoka International E-84 , Site ' C' UPSIDC Sikandara Industrial Area, Sikandara, Agra- 282007 126. 9319684

Ashoka International E-84, Site ' C' , UPSIDC, Sikandara Industrial Area , Sikandara, Agra- 282007 127. 9319785

Honda Siel Power Products Limited V.P.O. Bhigwara, ia-Kichha-263148 , Rudrapur, Distt . U.S. Nagar

128. 9319886

Metro Cements Pvt . Ltd. Vill . Bawla, Sub Tehsil Tawroo , Tehsil Nuh, Gurgaon 129. 9319987

Parul Foods Specialities (P) Ltd. 166-67 , Km StoneG.R. Road , KhanpurKolian, Distt . Kurukshetra - 136131

130. 9320063

Parul Food Specialities (P) Ltd. 166-67 , Km StoneG.R. Road, KhanpurKolian, Distt. Kurukshetra- 136131

131. 9320164

ShreeGuru Nanak Pipe Gram Udyog Mandal , Vill . Sakta Khera, Teh . Mandi , Dabwali, Sirsa (HR) 132. 9320265

Alakhnanada Plywood Industries (P) Ltd. Vill . Ram Vihar Colony , Khajuri Road, Yamunanagar- 135001 133. 9320366

Mangla Enterprises 260 , Idl . Area , Phase IX, Mohali

BlockBoards

01659

02052

79 Compound Feed for Cattle

11226

Leather Safety Footwear Having

01989 01

Leather SafetyBoots and Shoes

11501

Engine Monoset Pump

91 Porland Pozzolana Cement 01489 01

Skimmed Milk Powder 13334 01

92 MilkPowder

01165

00458

88 Precast Concrete Pipes

01328

Veneered Decorative Plywood

98 Packaged Drinking Water 14543 2207 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

00427

65 2002/01

134. 9320467

Distemper Dry Colour as Req.

Moonlight Paint& Allied Industries Rampura Road, Vill. Chitta Kalan , Amritsar

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

135. 9320568

Shiva Ganga Natural Mineral Water Co. 124, Focal Point, Batala- 143505

00303

136. 9320669

Plywood for General

Purpose

Bhiwani Enterprises 0-26, Behind Subzi Mandi , Industrial Area , Yamunanagar- 135001

08112

43Grade OPC

137. 9320770

Vikram Bathinda Cement GrindingUnit , Vill . Lehra Mohabat , P.O. Rampura, Phul Bathinda - 151111

01489 01

138. 9320871

Portland Pozzolana

Cement

Vikram Bathinda Cement GrindingUnit, Lehra Mohabat , Teh . Rampura , Phul Distt. Bathinda-

2001

03589

139. 9320972

SteelPipe for water &

Sewage

Swastik Pipes Ltd. Vill. Kotwan , Kosikalan Mile Stone, 97 , NH-2 , Delhi Mathura Road, Teh . Chatta, Mathura-

08275

140. 9321065

Binocular Eyepieces

forMicroscope

Radical Instruments 123 , Industrial Estate , Ambala Cantt- 133006

03685

Student Type Microscope

141. 9321166

Radical Instruments 123 , Industrial Estate, Ambala Cantt- 133006

08249

2002/03

142.9321267

Zinc Sulphate

Heptahydrate,

Agra

Mahesh Chemical and Allied Industries 24, Indl . Area - III , Sirsa-

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

143.. 9321368

Deep Aqua Processors Shahjahanpur Road , Faridpjur, Distt . Bareilly-

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

144. 9321469

New Age Aqua Pvt . Ltd. Budkhal , Faridabad- 121011

02202 01

145. 9321570

Wooden Flush Door

Shutters

Oberoi Wood Industries M- 15 , Industrial Area , Yamunanagar - 135001

01328

146. 9321671

Veneered Decorative Plywood

RajanSteel 21-22 Industrial Estate , Phase- 1 , Yamunanagar - 135001 2208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

1 2

147. 9321772

Neelgiri Wood Crafts Vill . Jorian Radaur Road , Yamunanagar- 148. 9321873

Kashmir Hygenics (P.) Ltd. VPOGobindpura, Bibiwala Road, Near Canal Rest House , Bathinda-

149. 9321974

DurgaManufacturing Co. 87/8 , Bhannana Purwa, Kalpi Road, Near Jaribchowki , Kanpur

2002/03

150. 9322067

Darbari FlooringTiles Shed No. 68 , Phase II , Motilal Nehru Engg . College , Industrial Estate , Taiarganj, Allahabad-

151. 9322168

Durga Enterprises Near Sobti Gas , Nurpur Raowali , Pathankot Road , Jalandhar-

2002/03

152. 9322269

Inder Industries Basti Nau Inder Nagar , Jalandhar-

2002/03

153. 9322370

Inder Industries Basti Nau Inder Nagar , Jalandhar-

2002/03

154. 9322471

Sun Steel FAB P.O. Gutkar, Distt. Mandi (HP) 2002/03

155. 9322572

Sant Valves ( P. ) Ltd. G.T. Road By Pass , Jalandhar- 144004 156. 9322673

Yash Enterprises E- 124, Site C, Sikandra Industrial Area, UPSIDC, Agra- 282007 157. 9322774

YashEnterprises E- 124, Site C, Sikandra Industrial Area, UPSIDC Sikandra, Agra-282007 158. 9322875

S.S. Safety Products 126 B, Cooperative, Indl . Estate, Dada Nagar , Kanpur.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

96 Veneered Decorative 01328 Plywood

98 Packaged Drinking Water 14543

02082

Stationary Storage Ele . WaterHeaters

01237

80 Cement Concrete FlooringTiles

09537 03

Conduitfor Electrical Installations

04003 ΟΙ

PipeWrenches

04003 02

PipeWrenches

02713 ΟΙ

Tubular Steel Poles for Overhea

09890

General PurposeBall Valves

01989 ΟΙ

Leather Safety Boots and Shoes

11226

Leather Safety Footwear having

05852

Protective Steel Toe CAP 2209

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2002/01

159. 9322976

The Kamrup Industrial GasesLimited, DieselLocomotive Township, Varanasi - 221004 160. 9323069

JaiswalTiles Jungle Benimadhav No. 2, Moharipur, Gorakhpur-273007 161. 9323170

Decent International Sales(India) Bhagat Singh Colony, NearR.J. Cold Storage , Jalandhar- 144008

2002/03

162. 9323271

R.A. Cements Pvt . Ltd. Vill.Mauhar, Distt.: Fatehpur

2002/03

163. 9323372

Industrial Progressive (India) Ltd. Vill .Aghwanpur, G.T. Road, Teh . Palwal , Distt.: Faridabad 164. 9323473

Aggarwal Timber Products W-9 , Industrial Area , Yamunanagar- 135001

2002/03

165. 9323574

Anurag Decoratives Vill. Jorian, Yamunanagar- 135001

2002/03

166. 9323675

Anurag Decoratives Vill . Jorian, Yamunanagar- 135001

2002/03

167, 9323776

Aicon Wires and Cables Industries , 27-A, Focal Point, Rajpura - 140401

2002/03

168. 9323877

Samrat Cement Industries Vill . Ganduan (Sunam) Distt. Sangrur 169, 9323978

Lalson Engg . Works 1052, Outside Industrial Area, Jalandhar - 144004

2002/03

170. 9324071

GreenValley Plywood Ltd. 29 Km . Stone, Rohtak Dehkora Railway Stn . Rd . , Vill . Rohad, Distt . Jhajjar

2002/03

171. 9324172

2002/03

172. 9324273

Unique Wood Industries Vill . Jorian, Yamunanagar Unique Wood Industries Vill . Jorian , Radaur Road, Yamunanagar- 135001

8 9

11006

Flash Back Arrestor

01237 .

Cement- Concrete Flooring Tiles

09890

BallValves

08112

43Grade OPC

13334 02

Skimmed Milk Powder

02202

Wooden Flush Door Shutters

00303

Plywood for General Purposes

01659

BlockBoards

00694

PVC Insulated Cables

08112

43Grade OPC

00778

CopperAlloy Gate Globe and Check Valves for Waterworks Purposes

01659

BlockBoards

01659

Block Boards

00303

Plywood for General Purposes 2210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004 /VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

9 1 2

84 173. 9324374

00778

S.K. Metal Industries (Regd . ) , E-60 , Industrial Area , Jalandhar- 144004

Copper Alloy Gate Globe and Check Valves for Waterworks Púrposes

2000. 174. 9324475

14834

LindaneDusting Powder

India Pesticides Limited E- 17 to 23 , UPSDIC Industrial Area, Deva Road Chinhat , Lucknow

01328

2002/03

175. 9324576

Veneered Decorative

Plywood

Bhawani Enterprises O-26, Behind Subzi Mandi , IndustrialArea, Yamunanagar- 135001

00269

89 176. 9324677

OPC 33 Grade

Sirmur Allied and Chemical Industries(P) Ltd. Vill.Muglanwala Kartarpur, P.O. Rajban Poanta Sahib , Distt. Sirmur

08249

94 2002/03

177. 9324778

Zinc Sulphate Heptahydrate , Agri .

D.D. Agro Industries Ltd. 29-C, Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana- 141003

01061

97 178. 9324879

2002/03

Disinfactant Fluids ,

Phenolic Type

Jannu Chemicals PlotNo. 3431, Near Sanjay Park , Gohana Road, Panipat- 132103

14151 02

2002/03

179. 9324980

Irrigation Equipment

Sprinkler

Malwa Fasteners (P) Ltd. 63, Industrial Area, Sector- 1 , Parwanoo

01061

97 180. 9325073

Disinfactant Fluids ,

Phenolic Type

Dinol Chemical Works , Arazi No. 5/1 , Mauza Maduadih , Varanasi

01489 01

181. 9325174

2002/03

Portland Pozzolana

Cement

Pangli Cement Co. (P) Vill.Gaonsgarh Rohon Rd. , Ludhiana

98 2002/03

182. 9325275

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Associated Minerals 43, Industrial Colony Naini, Allahabad

01239

2002/03

183. 9325376

Mild Steel Tubes ,

Tubulars

SwastikPipeLtd. Vill . Kotwan Kosikalan Mile Stone 97, NH 2, Delhi Mathura Road , Distt . Mathura

84 184. 9325477

00778

Sharda Metals E-27, Focal Point Extn . , Jalandhar

CopperAlloy Gate Globe and Check Valves for Waterworks Purposes

00458

185. 9325578

2002/03

Precast Concrete Pipes

Una Spun Pipe (P) Ltd. Plot No. 9, Industrial Area , Vill . Tahliwal , Distt . Una (H.P.) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2211

भारत का राजपत्र: मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

186. 9325679

2002/03

8 9

00996

79 Single Phase Small AC

Rajdeep Business Combine

3G, N.I.T. Faridabad

187..9325780

2002/03

11951

87 Pumpset for Desert Coolers

Rajdeep Business Combine

3G/ 193 , N.I.T. , Faridabad

188. 9325881

2002/04

88 Drums, Large Fixed Ends 01783 02

ShivaUdyog

Shiv Vihar, Sonepat Road,

Sampla, Distt. Rohtak

189. 9325982 2002/03 Bareilly Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vill. Panch Deoria, PO Bhojipura, Bareilly 190. 9326075

2002/03 Bareilly Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vill. PanchDeoria, Nainital Road , Bhojipura, Distt. Bareilly 191. 9326176

2002/03

A.R. Polymers Pvt. Ltd. B- 29 , IndustrialArea, Malwan, Fatehpur 192. 9326277

2002/04

Taila Jewellers LakhdataBazar , Jammu Tawi - 180001 193. 9326378

2002/03

The Hanuman Weavers Product Coop . Indl . Society Ltd. P.O. Delhi Road, Near Sector 12, Sonepat-131001 194. 9326479

01659

Block Boards

00303

89 Plywood for General Purposes

00303

89 Plywood for General Purposes

01417

99 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artifacts- Finess and Marking

00758

Handloom Cotton Gauze Absorbent , Non - sterlized

01328

96 Veneered Decorative Plywood

Ved Parkash Mittal and Sons

W-9, Industrial Area ,

Yamunanagar

195. 9326580

2002/03

Mahan Foods Ltd. Vill. Kunja RampurRoad, Poanta Sahib 196. 9326681

2002/03

Chawla Fire Protection Engineers 2095 MIE, Bahadurgarh

2002/03

197. 9326782

Anupam HomeAppliances Vill. Kheri , Trilok Pur Road, KalaAmb , Nahan , Distt. Sirmour

2002/03

198. 9326883

JaypeeCement Grinding Unit Vill. Sadva Khurd, Pargana Arail, Tehsil Bara, Distt. Allahabad 199. 9326984

2002/04 G.S.Agencies PlotNo. 46 , Indl . Area, Phase 1 , Chandigarh- 160001

200. 9327077

2002/04

Standard Electricals D- 116 , Phase VII , Industrial Area , Mohali

01165

MilkPowder

04947

85 GasCartridges for use inFire

01238

85 Hurricane Lanterns

01489 01

91 Portland Pozzolana Cement

98 PackagedDrinking Water 14543

08828

96 ElectricalAccessories Circuit

[CMD- 1/13 : 11 ].

S. K. CHAUDHURI , Dy. Director General "

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

2212

Shri Tilak Ram Tiwari ,

श्रम मंत्रालय

S/o Shri Shyam Narain Tiwari ,

नई दिल्ली, 12 अप्रैल, 2004

Village Harchandpur, Now 296, Dhaka Johar , Mukherji Nagar , Delhi through

Rajdhani Karamchari Union (Regd. ), Opposite Kalkaji Bus Stop ,

-Workman

Giri Nagar, New Delhi - 110019

Versus

Director,

M/s. Community Bio Gas Project,

का० आ० 1116.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै० कम्युनिटी बायो गैस प्रोजेक्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75 एवं 76/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Khadi & Village Industries ,

-Management

Masood Pur, New Delhi .

AWARD

[सं. एल-42012/ 190/90- आईआर (डीयू); एल-42012/189/90- आईआर (डीयू) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

In I.D. No. 75/91 the Central Government in its Ministry ofLabour vide its Order No. L-42012 / 190/90 - IR (DU) dated 13-6-91 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal/Court for adjudication:-

* New Delhi , the 12th April, 2004

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s. Community Bio Gas Project Khadi and Village Industries , Masoodpur, New Delhi in terminating the servicesofShri Ram Avtar w.e.f. 4-10-89 is justified? Ifnot, towhat relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

AND

S.O. 1116.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 75& 76/91 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employer in relation to the management of M/ s . Community Bio Gas Project and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-4-2004 .

In I.D. No. 76/91 the Central Government in its Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-42012/ 189/90- IR (DU) dated 13-6-91 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal/Court for adjudication :

[No. L-42012/190/90- IR(DU); L-42012/ 189/90- IR (DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Community Bio Gas Project Khadi and Village Industries, Masoodpur , New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Tilak Ram Tiwari w.e.f. 2-3-90 is justified? If not, to what relief is entitled to?" IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT NEWDELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER

SHRI B.N. PANDEY

LD . NO . 75/91

2. Since both the references are against the same Management, facts are similar and common question is involved in disposal ofboth the cases, hence both ofthem , for the sake of convenience , are taken together for adjudication and being disposed of by this common award which shall govern both of them .

3. In both the cases the claimants have filed their separate claim statement and the management has also filed its written statement. Both the parties have also led their separate oral as well as documentary evidence in support of their case.

-Workman

Shri Ram Avtar S /o Shri Ram Asrey, R/o Village Sant Ka Purva, PostRukunpur, Bara Post Samrota, Distt. Rai Bareilli (UP) and at Present atDelhi through Rajdhani Karamchari Union (Regd. ), Opposite Kalkaji , NewDelhi .

Versus

Director,

M/s. Community BioGas Project, Khadi & Village Industries,

--Management

Masood Pur, New Delhi .

AND

4. In I.D. No. 75/9 ] workman Shri Ram Avtar filed his statement of claim alleging that he was employed with the management as a helper since September, 1984 and his last wages drawn was Rs . 750/- PM , that he worked with the entire satisfaction ofthe management and has unblemished service records . He has not given any chance of complaint to the Management; that he worked on the directions of the management for more than 8 hours in a day i.e. 12 hours works in a day but he was not paid overtime wages .

I.D. NO. 76/91 2213

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

employed on project to project basis . That the services of the workmen were never terminated by the management butthe workmen absented themselves at their own accord . That the workmen are not entitled to get any relief or amount; that the contents ofthe claim statements are wrong and the claims are liable to be dismissed with costs .

7. In both the cases workmen filed their rejoinder against the written statement of the management . In rejoinder it was further alleged that the workmen was a regular employee and not on day to day basis . They reiterated their earlier versions .

The management every time gave assurance to him but all the assurances were in vain ; that on raising demand by the workman the management terminated his services on 4-10-89 without payment of any amount or terminal benefits; that the termination was in clear violation of the provisions of the I.D. Act , 1947. Hence it is illegal , wrong and unjustified and also against the principles of natural justice; that the workman raised a dispute before the conciliation officer which ultimately failed. Hence this reference . That the workman is unemployed since the date of his termination . Hence he is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages , continuity of service and all other benefits .

8. I have heard 1d. rep sentatives of both the sides and perused the file.

5. In I.D. No. 76/91 the workman while challenging histermination order filed statement of claim alleging that he was employed with the management as a helper and his last wages drawn was Rs . 870/- PM w.e.f. January, 1986; that he worked with the entire satisfaction of the management and his service record was unblemished; that onthe directions of the management he worked for 14 hours daily but he was not paid any wages for overtime work; that on raising demand by the workman the management terminated his service on the same day i.e. 1-3-90 without making payment ofany terminal benefit; that the termination order is in clear violation of the provisions of I.D. Act, 1947. Hence it is illegal, wrong, unjustified and also against the principles of natural justice ; that the workman raised his disputes before the Regional Labour Commissioner but the cancellation proceedings failed . Hence this reference, Workman has prayed that the termination order is illegal , wrong and unjustified. Hence he is entitled to be reinstated in service with continuity, full back wages and other benefits .

9.Workmen Shri Ram Avte and Tilak Ram Tewari both have specifically alleged in para 2 of their statement ofclaim that they were employed with the management as a helper since September , 1984 and January , 1986 respectively . In its reply the Management has admitted this fact in its written statement by alleging that the contents ofpara 2 are admitted only to the extent that the workman was employed for certain periods in the exigencies ofwork on day to day basis . It was further leged that they were engaged on daily wages basis and their wages was paid at the end of the month . It was never stated that they were engaged for any specific term only. On the other hand the workman claimed that they were regular employee and not on day to day basis . The workman Ram Avtar has also filed adocument Ext . P.W. 7 in his evidence which is in the forni ofoffice report signed by Shri C.S. Chandel, State Director, itisaddressed to one Shri Tripurari Rai , Assistant Clerk. In thisletter names of five workers including present workmen RamAvtar and Tilak Ram are mentioned to arrange for their regularisation. In this letter it has been mentioned that the Chairman had ordered the State Director that the five workmen including Ram Avtar and Tilak Ram have been working inMasoodpur Gas Pariyojna in temporary capacity for about 14 years . Hence their files be submitted to the Chairman with report to make them regular . The workmen have also filed several copies of their personal letters showing that they were giving their address as an employee of Gas Plant Masoodpur , New Delhi. MW1 Shri C.S. Chandel Director of the Management has filed his affidavit Ext. MW1 / 1 on behalf of the Management wherein be bas deposed that the land on which the plant was working is a lease land, the terms of which was to expire on 17-4-89 but the management applied for further extension of lease and is presently continuing with the project at the same premises. Inpara 8 of the affidavit Shri Chandel has further deposed that this work has now been assigned to contractors since February. 1989 who are now responsible forproviding contract labour at the project as is clearfrom Ex . MW 1/1 . He further deposed that " after October, 1989 Shri Ram Avtar did not show up for work at all . He was never terminated by the management . Had he showed up for work after that date then he would have given work as and when there was work for him " . In his cross -examination

Mr. C.S. Chandel stated in his cross -examination that " the 6. In boththe cases the management- respondent filed its separate written statement denying the claim of the workman and inter alia alleging that the Community Bio Gas Project is an experimental project in public interest found by the Department of Non- conventional Energy Resources , Government of India for a temporary period. Therefore, all the workmen employed thereon day to day basis only in exigencies of work; that in view of the same there is no termination of the workman and the question of any dispute does not arise . It was further alleged that the workman Ram Avtar and Tilak Ram Tewari absented on their own accord from duty w.e.f. October, 1989 and26-2-90 respectively ; that the projects of the management are purely experimental and demonstrative on no profit no loss basis only in the public interest to provide new means of energy forthe future generation and though the Bio Gas system is technically feasible its economic development, social acceptability, management system etc. are to be examined and a correct assessment made by means of these experimental community Bio Gas Plants. That since the project is only experimental and demonstrative project the entire work of the project was being done by casual workmen employed on day to day basis only in the exigencies ofwork. Such workmen are daily rated workmen

344 G1 /2004-6 2214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] gas plant at any other place . Ram Avtar used to do thejob paid on monthly basis . It appears that the management has purposely concealed correct and relevant facts . The management has also not produced any muster roll or original payment register of wages . I find that the workman has successfully proved their case that they had been working for about 3 or 4 years continuously with certain notional breaks,by the management as also holidays and their services were terminated arbitrarily by the management without following the proper procedures for retrenchment of casual labours . I find that the evidence of the management is shakely, contradictory and most unreliable . It is also not sufficient to rebut the evidence of the workman . According to its own document of the management the workman had acquired temporary status and their files were also being requisitioned by the chairman for their regularisation but the management arbitrarily removed them from services . The management also did not issue any show cause notice to the workmen. If the workman had absconded as alleged by the management . The management also did not initiate any enquiry or departmental proceeding . The management also did not give any notice , notice pay , or compensation for their termination as required by the provisions under Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act . I find that the termination of both the workmen from their services was in clear violation of the provisions of law and principles of natural justice . Hence it

cannot be legally sustained and it is liable to be quashed . 10. In view of the above discussions I find that the action of the management of M / s . Community Bio -Gas Project , Khadi and Village Industries , Masoodpur , New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Ram Avtar w.e.f. 4-10-89 and Shri Tilak Ram Tiwari w.e.f. 2-3-90 are illegal and unjustified and both the workmen Shri Ram Avtar and Tilak Ram Tewari are entitled to be reinstated with continuity in service and all other consequential benefits . However, in the facts and circumstances of the case I am of the view that both the workmen are entitled to get only 30% of their back wages . Reinstatement of the workmen in their service and payment of back wages in view of this award shall be made within 30 days of the publication of the award in the Official Gazette . Parties shall bear their own costs . Award is given accordingly . A copy of this award shall be placed on the file of I.D. No. 76 of 91 original being placed on the file of I.D. No. 75/91 . Dated: 2-4-04.

B.N. PANDEY , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 अप्रैल , 2004

का० आ० 1117.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल शीप ब्रिडिंग फार्म के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/96/2 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

of watchman Peon or helper . " He further stated that his (Ram Avtar) duty was from 8 AM to 1 PM and 2 to 5 PM as perterm of daily wages . He further stated that since the workman had absconded from his duty so no charge sheet , memo or enquiry was held in his case . No letter was sent to him for joining duty as he had himself absconded . Similar facts were deposed in the case of Shri Tilak Ram workman in I.D. No. 76 of 1991. Shri C.S. Chandel deposed in his affidavit that Shri Tilak Ram did not show up for work after February , 1990. He was never terminated by the Management . Had he showed up for work he would have been given work for him . He further alleged that Shri Tilak Ram did not come for work after 26-2-90 on his own accord. Thewitness further deposed in para 8 of his affidavit that this work has now been assigned to contractors since February, 1989. On the other hand Shri Tilak Ram Tiwari and Ram Avtar filed their affidavit in support of their claim. Shri Tilak Ram Tewari state that he was working from January, 1986 to 1-3-90 and Ram Avtar stated as WWI that he was appointed on 1st September , 84 and his services were terminated by one Shri Tripurari Rao S.D.C. on 4-10-89 . Herefrom the above evidence it is very much clear that workmen were engaged by the management . They were paid on monthly basis . According to the management their services were never terminated and the workmen themselves absronded and did not turn up for duty . Yet it stands to no reason that why the workmen would have left their services on their own accord and had it been so they would have not raised any dispute for getting the sarne job. It has also come in the management's evidence that the work of the management is of regular nature and the project is still working . According to the management's evidence the workman Tilak Ram did not turn up after 26-2-90 but there is a contradictory evidence to falsify this version . According to which the work of the management has now been assigned to contractors since February , 1989 . This fact itself speaks a volume against the conduct of the management . This fact itself goes to show that the management terminated the services of the workmen and thereafter assigned that work which was being performed by the workmen to the contractors . It supports the workmen's case. Apart from this the management has itself filed certain payment vouchers through which wages of the workmen were paid . It is surprising to note that the management has filed certain photo copy of a few vouchers only which is not for the entire period . There is also no evidence adduced by the management to show that the workman did not work in remaining period. There is also nothing to show that the workmen had worked for only those days to which these vouchers relate . These vouchers also indicate and corroborates the versions of the workmen

thatthey were working regularly and their wages was being

[सं. एल-42011/42/91- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी 2215

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 12th April, 2004

2.The authorised representative of the workman Shri Darshan Singh vide his applications for the persons mentioned in separate list ( list attached ) withdraws the reference in respect of above persons . In view of the applications , the case/ reference concerning to above persons is returned as withdrawn . The case of remaining will continue to be pending till its final decision . Central Govt. be informed . This award will operate in all the cases mentioned in the list attached .

Chandigarh

S.O. 1117.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33/96/2 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Central Sheep Breeding Farm and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-04-04.

[No. L -42011 /42/ 91 - IR(DU) ]

KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH PRESIDING OFFICER

SHRI S. M. GOEL

Case No. ID 33/96/2

The President,

Distt . Agriculture Workers Union ,

S. M. GOEL , Presiding Officer Dated 20-2-2004 .

Name of the workman

Sl . I.D. No.

No.

Om Parkash Vs.

1. 33/96/2

Ram Kumar

2. 33/96/3

Shero Rattan

3. 33/96/4

4. 33/96/5

BegaChawhidu

5. 33/96/6

Bhím Bahadur

6. 33/96/7

Sube

Zile

7. 33/96/8

Birbal

8. 33/96/9

9. 33/96/13

Bhim Singh

10. 33/96/14

Applicant Gali No. 5 , House No. 123 , Jawahar Nagar, Hissar- 125001

Bhoop Singh

11. 33/96/15

VERSUS

BirSingh

Charta

12. 33/96/17

13. 33/96/18

Chatter Singh

Dharambir

14. 33/96/19

TheDirector , Central Sheep Breeding Farm , Hissar- 125001 .

Respondent 15. 33/96/20 Dhanpat

16. 33/96/22

REPRESENTATIVES:

Dariya

17. 33/96/24

Fateh Singh

Hukma

18. 33/96/25

Shri Darshan Singh 19. 33/96/26

Shri SanjayGoel For the Workman : For the Management:

Indraj

20. 33/96/28

AWARD

Jagdish

21. 33/96/30 JeetSingh

22. 33/96/31

(Passed on 20-2-2004)

Jagdish

23. 33/96/33

Karam Singh

Lilu

24. 33/96/34

ManSukh

25. 33/96/35

The Central Govt . vide Notification No. L- 42011 /42/ 91 - IR( DU) dated the 27th March , 1996 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Om Parkash

26. 33/96/36

Mahender

27. 33/96/37

Morden

28. 33/96/40

29. 33/96/41

"Whether the activities of the Central Sheep Breeding Farm , Hissar constitute to be that of ' Industry ' under the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947. If so ,

Manphool

Ram Jas

30. 33/96/43

Nasib

31. 33/96/45

Om Parkash

32.33/96/46

33. 33/96/49

"Whether the action of the management of Central Sheep Breeding Farm , Hissar in terminating the Services of 137 workers as per details given in the annexure is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to ? "

PayareSingh

Pirthi

34. 33/96/50

2216

1 2

35. 33/95/52 RamNarayan

Ram Dhan 36. 33/95/53

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

1 2

Lila

82. 33/96/125

83. 33/96/126 Sultan

84. 33/96/129

Sham Dass 37. 33/95/55

Ramal Das 38. 33/96/56

Ram Kumar 39. 33/95/57

Manohar

85. 33/96/130 SuratSingh

86. 33/96/132 Dharam Chand

Moman

87. 33/96/133

RamKumar 40. 33/95/58

41. 33/96/59 Ranjeet

88. 33/96/134 Naphe Singh

89. 33/96/135

42. 33/96/62

RamKumar

Chand

43. 33/96/65

44. 33/96/66 Surja

45. 33/96/67

SherSingh 46. 33/96/69

Shamsher 47. 33/96/70 Surat Singh

SantLal

48. 33/96/71

Sohan Lal

49. 33/96/72

50. 33/96/75 SubeSingh 51. 33/96/76 SatbirSingh 52. 33/96/77

Sarwan

53. 33/96/78

SaiDas

54. 33/96/79 BalRaj

55. 33/96/80 Sukhbir

56. 33/96/82

Telu

57. 33/96/84 TopanDas

Parlahad

58. 33/96/86

Rohtash

59. 33/96/87

60. 33/96/88

Babu Lal

61. 33/96/89

Dharma

63/96/90

Inder

63. 33/96/91

Om Parkash 64. 33/96/94

Hari Ram

65. 33/96/95 Nihal Singh

Bira Lal

66. 33/96/97

Satbir

67. 33/96/98

68. 33/96/99 AmiLal

69. 33/96/100 Bhagwan

70. 33/96/101 Ram Singh

Soni Ram

71. 33/96/102

Chander Bhan 72. 33/96/104

73. 33/96/105 Surjeet

74. 33/96/107 PalSingh

75. 33/96/108 Ishwar Singh 76. 33/96/110 Sube S/ Ram Nath 77. 33/96/115 Tota Ram

78. 33/96/117 Ishwar

79. 33/96/118 Jagdish

Budhan

80. 33/96/120

Pirthvi

81. 33/96/122

Sukhbir Singh

90. 33/96/1 Sher Singh

नई दिल्ली, 12 अप्रैल , 2004

का० आ ० 1118.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 223/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -42012/216/99 - आई ०आर० (डी०यू० ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 12th April , 2004

S.O. 1118. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 223/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employer in relation to the management of Telecom Deptt . and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-04-04.

[No. L-40012/216/99 - IR(DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT,

CHANDIGARH .

PRESIDING OFFICER SHRI S. M. GOEL

Case No. I.D. NO . 223/99

Sh . Raj Kumar S/o Sh . Roop Lal ,

Vill .& P.O. Dungrin ,

Ten.Bhoraj , Hamirpur

(Distt.)-210301. ...... Applicant . Versus

The Telecom Distt . Manager,

Telecommunication , Hamirpur (Distt.) 210301. .....Respondent 2217

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

APPEARANCES

Shri D. R. Sharma

For the Workman

as there was no further work available with the management . It isalso pleaded that the management has not violated the provisions of the 1.D. Act 1947 and the reference of the workman deserves to be rejected .

Shri H.C. Arora

For the Management

AWARD

(Passed on 31-3-2004)

Central Govt. Ministry of Labour vide letter No. L- 40012/ 216/ 99 /IR ( DU ) dated 21st of October 1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Telecom Distt . Manager Hamirpur (H.P. ) in terminating the services ofSh. Raj Kumar S/ o Sh. Roop Lal w.e.f. 1-8-96 and again w.e.f. 10-11-98 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief he is entitled? "

4. In evidence the applicant filed his own affidavit Ex . WI and also documents Ex . W2 to W7 .In rebuttal the management produced Shri D. R. Daroch DE Admn . as MWI who filed his affidavit Ex . Ml . This witness has admitted the number of days mentioned in Ex . W6 which are260 days from 9/95 to 7/96 . It is also admitted by this witness that the workman was engaged in pursuance of theHon'ble High Court order on 10-8-1996 and the writ petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court on 29-10-1996 and the stay was vacated . It is also admitted by thiswitness that the workman was engaged from 9-8-1996 to 9-11-1998 but with breaks he failed to tell the break period . It is also admitted by the witness of the management that no retrenchment compensation was paid to the workman and no notice was also given .

2. In the Claim Statement it is pleaded by the workman that he was engaged as daily rated mazdoor on 29-9-1995 and continued upto 31-7-1996 when his services were terminated on 1-8-1996 . Experience certificate was also issued by the JTO and thus he has completed more than 240 days of service excluding Sundays and leaves etc. It is further pleaded that in the year 1996 there were some vacancies with the management and the name of the workman was sponsored by the employment exchange on the basis of experience . He was also interviewed alongwith other candidates but at the cost of ignoring the applicant the management offered the appointment to the persons who had no experience viz Kaldeep Chand, Rajinder Kumar, Rajan Sharma, Balbir Singh, Vikas Kumar , Pawan Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar . Against the termination by the management the applicant approached the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble High Court directed the management to re- engage him into service on the same terms and canditions . Lateron on 27-10-1996 the writ petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court for want of jurisdiction . The workman again approached the Central Admn. Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench against the termination ofthe workman . The C.A.T. also observed that the claimant may approach the appropriate forum for necessary relief. It isthus claimed by the workman that though he continued working since 1995 till date and he completed more than three years and had also completed more than 240 days in the year 1996 , 1997 and 1998 respectively and the fact is that similar situated persons are getting Rs . 3200/ - per month but all of a sudden on 9-11-1998 his services were again terminated without following the procedure prescribed under the I.D. Act 1947 in as much as the management has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25 - F, G& H of the ID Act 1947. The workman has thus prayed for his reinstatement in service with full backwages and other attendant benefits .

5. 1 have heard the learned counsels for the parties and have also gone through the written arguments filed by the rep . of the management . It is admitted position that the workman had worked for more than 240 days during the period from Sep. 1995 to the date of termination i.e. 31-7-1996 and also worked for more than 240 days even from the date of vacation of the stay in the writ petition i.e. 29-10-96 to 9-11-1998 . The workman continued working with the management for both these period and also worked for more than 240 days during this period because no evidence contrary to this has been produced by the management . The contention of the learned counsel for the management is that the workman was not appointed in accordance with the rules of the department and the service ofthe workman amounts to backdoor entry in Govt . service . Healso referred to me the case law of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Head Master Govt . High School Versus Ajit Singh reported in 2003 (4 ) RSJ 781. 1 have gone through the judgement cited by the learned counsel for the management. The facts and circumstances ofthe referred case law are different from the case in hand . In the above referred judgement , the headmaster engaged some teacher despite the specific ban by the Govt . of Haryana. But in the case in hand , no evidence was placed onrecord that there is a ban and the workman was engaged for two times and that too for long periods . The name of theworkman was also sponsored through the employment exchange and no evidence was produced by the management to rebutt this plea of the workman . Therefore . the plea of the management that this is backdoor entry holds no grounds and the workman was not engaged through back door entry . The learned counsel for the management also argued that the service rendered by the applicant from 9-8-1996 till 27-10-1996 can not be counted for any purposes whatsoever in view of the judgements reported in 1997 (2 ) SCT 747 and 1980 ( 3 ) SLR316. Even if thisperiod i.e. 9-8-96 to 27-10-1996 is excluded , the workman has worked from 28-10-1996 to 10-11-1998 and he has completed more than 240 days of service during this period immediately preceding to the date of termination . Therefore . it isproved on record that in each term the workman has worked with the management for more than 240 days in one calander year and the services of the workman were 3. In written statement it is pleaded by the management that the workman was engaged as casual labour . He did not complete 240 days of service and the applicant was not appointed through transparent process ofcompetition and the workman is not entitled to any relief. It is futher pleaded that persons found to be most suitable were appointed on regular basis . It is also pleaded that service in pursuence to the interim order dated 9-8-96 are not liable to be counted for any purpose whatsoever and the services ofthe workman were disengaged on 10-11-1998 2218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004 /VAISAKHA 18, 1926.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI S.M. GOEL

terminated without following the mandatory procedure as prescribed U/S 25- F ,G and H of the I.D. Act as no retrenchment compensation was paid by the management and no notice or notice pay was given at the time of retrenchment by the management.

Case No. I.D. NO . 224/99

Shri Shashi Kamal son of Sarav Ram , Village & PO Dungrin, Teh . Behogran , Hamirpur.

.....Applicant .

Versus

TheTelecom Distt . Manager ,

Telecommunication , Hamirpur

(Distt.)

Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman Shri D.R. Sharma

6. The learned counsel for the management has also argued that the workman is not entitled for backwages even if it is held that he is entitled for reinstatement and has also cited the case law of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court reported as 2001 (4 ) SCT 921 and also pleaded that as the workman has not made any averment in the statement of claim and his affidavit . It is pertinent to mention here that the workman in his coross -examination has deposed that he is unemployed and it is also incumbent upon the management to prove that the workman is gainfully employed . Therefore , the authority cited by the leamed counsel for the managernent is not applicable on the facts of the case in hand.

Shri H.C. Arora

Forthe Management

AWARD

(PASSED ON 31-3-2004)

Central Government Ministry of Labour vide letter No. L-40012/215/ 99/ IR ( DU) dated 21st of October , 1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

7. In view ofthe discusions made in the earlier paras , the action of the Telecom District Manager Hamirpur ( HP) in terminathing the services of the workman Raj Kumar son ofRoop Lal w.e.f. 1-8-1996 and again w.e.f. 10-11-1998 is illegal and unjustified . The workman is entitled to reinstatement in service with full backwages and other attendant benefits including continuity of service . The workman is ordered to be reinstated in service . The management is directed to reinstate the workman within one month from the date of the publication of the Award, and pay all the monetary benefits within one month . Reference is answered in favour of the workman . Central Government be informed .

"Whether the action of the Telecom Distt . Manager , Hamirpur ( H.P. ) in terminating the services of Sh . Shashi Kamal son of Sh . Sarav Ram w.e.f. 1-8-1996 and again w.e.f. 10-11-1998 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled ?"

Chandigarh

Dated: 31-3-2004

S.M. GOEL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 12 अप्रैल, 2004

का० आ ० 1119. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 224/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/215/99- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th April , 2004

S.O. 1119. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 224/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Telecom Deptt . and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 12-4-2004 .

[No. L-40012/215/ 99 - IR( DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

2.In the Claim statement it is pleaded by the workman thathe was engaged as daily rated mazdoor on 29-9-1995 and continued up to 31-7-1996 when his services were terminated on 1-8-1996 . Experience certificate was also issued by the JTO and thus he has completed more than 240 days of service excluding Sundays and leaves etc. It is further pleaded that in the year 1996 there were some vacancies with the management and the name of the workman was sponsored by the employment exchange on the basis of experience . He was also interviwed alongwith other candidates but at the cost of ignoring the applicant the management offered the appointment to the persons who had no experience viz . Kaldeep Chand, Rajinder Kumar , Rajan Sharma, Balbir Singh, Vikas Kumar , Pawan Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar . Against the termination by the management the applicant approached the Hon'ble High Courtand theHon'ble High Court directed the management to re- engage him into service on the same terms and conditions . Later on on 27-10-1996 the writ petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court for want of jurisdiction . The workman again approached the Central Admn . Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench against the termination ofthe workman . The C.A.T. also observed that the claimant may approach the appropriate forum for necessary relief. It is thus claimedby the workman that though he continued working since 1995 till date and he completed more than three years and had also completed more than 240 days in [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

2219 the years 1996, 1997 and 1998 respectively and the fact is thatsimilar situated persons are getting Rs . 3200 per month butall of a sudden on 9-11-1998 his services were again terminated without following the procedure prescribed under the I.D. Act , 1947 in as much as the management has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25 - F , G & H ofthe ID Act, 1947. The workman has thus prayed for his reinstatement in service with full backwages and other attendant benefits .

3. In written statement it is pleaded by the management that the workman was engaged as casual labour . He did not complete 240 days of service and the applicant was not appointed through transparent process ofcompetition and the workman is not entitled to any relief. Itisfuther pleaded that persons found to be most suitable were appointed on regular basis . It is also pleaded that service in pursuence to the interim order dated 9-8-1996 are not liable to be counted for any purpose whatsoever and the services of the workman were disengaged on 10-11-1998 as there was no further work available with the management . It is also pleaded that the management has not violated the provisions of the I.D. Act, 1947 and the reference of the workman deserves to be rejected .

learned counsel for the management . The facts and circumstances of the referred case law are different from the case in hand. In the above referred judgment , the headmaster engaged some teacher despite the specific ban bytheGovernment. of Haryana. But in the case in hand , no evidence was placed on record that there is a ban and the workman was engaged for two times and that too for long periods . The name of the workman was also sponsored through the employment exchange and no evidence was produced by the management to rebutt this plea of the workman . Therefore, the plea of the management that this isbackdoor entry holds no grounds and the workman was not engaged through back door entry . The learned.counsel for the management also argued that the service rendered by the applicant from 9-8-1996 till 27-10-1996- cannot be counted for any purposes whatsoever in view of the judgments reported in 1997 (2) SCT 747 and 1980 (3 ) SLR 316. Even if this period i.e. 9-8-1996 to 27-10-1996 is excluded, the workman has worked from 28-10-1996 to 10-11-1998 and he has completed more than 240 days of service during this period immediately preceding to the date oftermination. Therefore, it is proved on record that in each term the workman has worked with the management for more than 240 days in one calendar year and the services of the workmanwere terminated without following the mandatory procedure as prescribed U/ S 25 - F, G and H of the I.D. Act as no retrenchment compensation was paid by the management and no notice or notice pay was given at the time ofretrenchment by the management .

4. In evidence the applicant filed his own affidavit Ex . Wl and also documents Ex . W2 to W7 . In rebuttal the management produced Shri D.R. Daroch . DE Admn . as MW1 who filed his affidavit Ex . M1 . This witness has admitted the number of days mentioned in Ex . W7 which are 260 days from 9/95 to 7/96 . It is also admitted by this witness that the workman was engaged in pursuance of the Hon'ble High Court order on 10-8-1996 and the writ petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court on 29-10-1996 and the stay was vacated. It is also admittedby thiswitness that the workman was engaged from 9-8-1996 to 9-11-1998 but with breaks but he failed to tell the break period. It is also admitted by the witness of the management that no retrenchment compensation was paid to the workman and no notice was also given .

6. The learned counsel for the management has also argued that the workman is not entitled for backwages even if it is held that he is entitled for reinstatement and has also cited the case law of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court reported as 2001 ( 4) SCT 921 and also pleaded that as the workman has not made any averment in the statement of claim and his affidavit. It is pertinent to mention here that the workman in his cross - examination has deposed that he is unemployed and it is also incumbent upon the management to prove that the workman is gainfully employed . Therefore, the authority cited by the learned counsel for the management is not applicable on the facts of the case in hand .

7. In view of the discusions made in the earlier paras , the action of the Telecom District Manager Hamirpur ( HP) in terminating the services of the workman Shashi Kamal son of Sarav Ram w.e.f. 1-8-1996 and again w.e.f. 10-11-1998 is illegal and unjustified . The workman is entitled to reinstatement in service with full backwages and other attendant benefits including continuity of service. The workman is ordered to be reinstated in service . The management is directed to reinstate the workman within one month from the date of the publication of the Award, and pay all the monetary benefits within one month . Reference is answered in favour of the workman . Central Government be informed .

Chandigarh

S.M. GOEL, Presiding Officer 5. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and have also gone through the written arguments filed by the rep. of the management . It is admitted position that the workman had worked for more than 240 days during the period from Sept. 1995 to the date of termination i.e. 31-7-1996 and also worked for more than 240 days even from the date of vacation of the stay in the writ petition i.e. 29-10-1996 to 9-11-1998 . The workman continued working with the management for both these period and also worked for more than 240 days during this period because no evidence contrary to this has been produced by the management . The contention of the learned counsel for the management is that the workman was not appointed in accordance with the rules of the department and the service of the workman amounts to backdoor entry in government service . He also referred to me the case law ofthe Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Head Master Government High School Versus Ajit Singh reported in 2003 (4) RSJ 781. I have gone through the judgment cited by the [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 8 , 2004 /VAISAKHA 18, 1926

नई दिल्ली 12 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1120.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कोलकता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 26/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

its behalf for proceeding with the case . Advocate for the management was present and prayed for passing a ' No Dispute Award' as none ever appeared on behalf of the workmen to pursue the case before the Tribunal . On a perusal of the record it appears that none has ever ap- pearedbefore the Tribunal on behalf of the workmen since the initiation of the present proceeding in spite of service of several notices upon the union. It is thus clear that the union is no longer interested to pursue the case under reference .

[सं. एल-40011/7/2003- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th April , 2004

3. In the above circumstance , this Tribunal has no other alternative but to dispose of the present reference by passing a ' No Dispute Award ' . A ' No Dispute Award ' is accordingly passed and the present reference is dis- posedof.

Date, Kolkata HRISHIKESH BANERJI , Presiding Officer

1stApril,2004

नई दिल्ली, 12 अप्रैल, 2004 S.O. 1120. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Gov- ernment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 26/2003 ) of the Central Government Industiral Tribunal Labour Court Kolkota now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Telecom Deptt. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-4-2004 .

का.आ. 1121.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 [No. L-40011 /7/2003 - IR(DU)]

KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALAT KOLKOTA

का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी डब्ल्यू. डी.के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । REFERENCE NO 26 OF 2003

[सं. एल- 42012/67/91 - डी 2 ( बी) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्कअधिकारी

'New Delhi , the 12th April , 2004 Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Telecom Civil Division , BSNL -III AND Theirworkmen

Present: Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Banerji

..Presiding Officer

Appearance:

Mr. R. Roy Advocate

Onbehalf of Management

None

Onbehalf of Workman

Industry:Telecom

State: West Bangal

S.O. 1121. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Gov- ernment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/92) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , New Delhi , No - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in relation to the man- agement of CPWD and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-04-2004 .

Dated: 1st April , 2004

AWARD

[No. L-42012/67/91 - D2 (B) KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

By order . No. L - 40011 / 7 /2003 / IR (DU ) dated 31-07-2003 the Central Govt. in exercise of its powers un- der Section 10( 1 ) ( d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - II RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

I.D. No.9/92

Presiding officer: R.N.Rai

In the matter of:-

Vijay Singh

"Whether Sh . R. C Panja alias Sh . Ganesh Panja who worked as Carpenter under various contrac- tors at Telecom Housing Complex , Ichapur , Howarh is entitled for absorption into the regular services of M/ s . BSNL or not ? Whether Mr. R. C Panja is entitled for an amount of Rs. 321500/- (Rupees three lac twenty one thou- sand and five hundred only) dues from M/ s . BSNL or not ? If so, to what relief he is entitled ? "

Versus

CP.W.D.

2.When the case was taken -up last on 19-03-2004, none appeared for the union , nor any step was taken on 2221 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/बैशाख 18, 1926

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L -42012/ 67/91/D -2(B) , Central Government dt. 06-01-1992has re- ferredthe following point for adjudication. The point runs ashereunder:-

didnot come.He abandoned the job himself. Since limita- tion is not applicable , even if there is delay of 7 years , he isstill entitled to be reinstated at least from the date when the case under the I.D. Act was filed . The citation stated above are fully applicable. In the facts and circumstances ofthis case, the reference is replied thus:-

"Whether the action of the management of DeputyDirector of Horticulture, North Division, CPWD , New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Vijay Singh and not considering him for fur- ther employment while recruitingfresh hands , is justified? if not, what relief he is entitled to?"

The action of the management of Deputy Director ofHorticulture, North Division, CPWD , New Delhi in ter- minating the services of Shri Vijay Singh and not consid- eringhim for further employment while recruiting fresh hands, is notjustified. The workman is entitled to be rein- stated from6-1-1992 without any backwages.

The award is given accordingly .

Dated:01-04-2004 R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 अप्रैल, 2004 The claimant has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, he has stated that he was initially en- gaged in sub -division - I of North Division as Muster Roll Mali w.e.f 17-06-1981 and was allowed to work upto 13-1- 1984. It has been further submitted that the workman was wrongly and illegally refused to work when he reported punctually and invariably on the work. spot from 14-01- 1984 onwards and new hands were employed after his wrongful and illegal termination . The management retained junior persons to him while refusing work and finally ter- minating his services.

का.आ. 1122.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 257/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल- 12025 / 10/ 2004- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th April , 2004 The management has filed WS . In the WS the man- agement has accepted his appointment . The case of the management is that he was casual mali w.e.f 17-6-1981 and worked their upto 13-01-1984 . Thereafter he himself left thejob and did not turn up . Since he has himself given up his work, he is not entitled to approach through union for re -employment and regularisation. He has come up after 7 years . It shows that he was doing job somewhere else sohis claim after 7 years is not justified. He is not entitled to get back wages also .

S.O. 1122.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 257/1999 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in rela- tion to the management of Canara Bank and their work- man, which was received by the Central Government on 12-04-2004.

[No: L- 12025/10/ 2004- IR( B : II) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT CHANDIGARH

Presiding Officer :

Shri S. M. Goel

CASE NO. LD . 257/99

The workman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder he has stated that he approached several times the au- thorities concerned but they gave him assurance they did. not allow him to join. So there was delay of 7 years . His work was satisfactory and no enquiry was held against him. He has not abandoned the job but he was not permit- ted to work. All the other allegations of the WS have been denied. Heard arguments from both the sides and perused. the papers on the record and the oral of both the parties. Thelearned counsel for the workman submitted that it has beenadmitted that he worked for more than 240 days and he was appointed at the post of Mali . The delay of 7 years isnot material as the limitation act is not applicable . In the 1.D. Act , as has been held in 1999-1 -ILJ- 1260 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court , so he cannot be deprived of the benefit as he approached after 7 years . In 1990- I - ILJ -463 , it has been held that if the name of the workman has been stricken off from the Muster Roll without paying him compensation, it cannot be deemed to be valid termination.

ArunKumar Ghai,

BXI - 1662 , Rari Mohalla, Ludhiana.

....Applicant It was argued from the side of the management that theworkman was in gainful employment somewhere so he

1344 GI/2004-7 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

2222

Versus

The management of Canara Bank ,

Circle Office , Plot No. 1 ,

Sector 34-A

Respondent

Chandigarh .

Court of Punjab & Haryana in Civil Writ Petition No. 14894 of 2003 titled as Canara Bank Vs. Arun Ghai in which it was further ordered that both the parties would be at lib- erty to lead such evidence as they deem necessary before the Tribunal & thereafter it shall decide the matter in ac- cordance with law .

APPEARANCE

: Shri B. J. Singh

For the Workman

: Shri Ashok Jagga

For the Management

AWARD

(PASSED ON 11-3-04)

The applicant has filed the present complaint U/s . 33 -A under the 1.D. Act 1947 inter- alia alleging therein that the management has been guilty of a contravention of the provisions of Section 33 of the I.D. Act . The same has been registered and treated as industrial dispute . It is pleaded in the complaint that the applicant is a protected workman being Central Committee Member of CanaraBank Staff Union which is a registered union and number of industrial disputes are pending between the workmen and the management before this Tribunal in which the appli- cant is representing the workmen . It is further pleaded that the managenient without seeking the prior approval of this Tribunal has issued the order dated 16-7-1998 dis- missing the applicant from service of the bank on trumped up charges and thus the management has violated the provisions of Section 33 (3 ) of the I.D. Act . The applicant prayed that this court may decide the above complaint of theworkman.

5. Both the parties were directed to lead theirevi- dence in support of their respective claims . The applicant Arun Kumar filed his own affidavits Ex . W1 and W2 and various documents Ex . W3 to W17 . Applicant also pro- ducedGurdarshan Singh, S/o Sh. Shingara Singh as WW2 . WW1 Mr. Arun Ghai in his affidavit . Supported the con- tents of the complaint . In reply to a Court Question , he answered that he was member of Central Committee , CanaraBank Staff Union and agenda was circulated with regard to election to all the members and besides him some other members were also elected, the minutes were pre- pared. Neither he could place on record the agenda of the meeting nor the minutes which were prepared . The man- agement through its counsel also cross -examined him and he deposed that he was claiming himself to be a protected workman being the Central Committee Member and he had no record with him which could state that he was a protected workman . He volunteered that the relevant record must be with General Secretary and five inore work- men were nominated as protected workman by the Union. He admitted that Bank never published or circulated any list of protected workmen as it was not a prective in the bank and no protest was ever lodged with the bank for not declaring him as a protected workman. Letter dated 09-09-1997 and 20-4-1998 Ex. W15 and W 17 were posted from Jagroan and Ludhiana respectively. Letter from Jagroan was posted by Harjit Singh Mann whereas letter from Ludhiana might have been posted by him . It was specifically suggested by the management that he was never made Central Committee Member nor he was de- clared as a protected workman. It was further suggested that letter Ex . W15 and W17 which were alleged intima- tions sent to the bank about the workınan being a pro- tected workman were neither posted nor resolved by the Union nor bore the signatures of H.S. Mann the purported signatory . It was also suggested that Mr. Mann had deliv- ered certain blank signed writing pads of the Union . He was confronted with comments Ex.M1 which is dated 20- 4-1998 which he denied having posted and rather alleged having given to DGM Disciplinary authority .

2. The management in reply to the complaint has taken preliminary objection that the applicant is not the protected workman under the provisions of the I.D. Act and therefore, the applicant is not entitled to any relief on the assumption of his being a protected workman . It is further pleaded that no prior approval of this Tribunal is required before taking the disciplinary action against the complainant and the charges against the workman are not trumped up . The management has conducted the requisite enquiry as per the stipulated procedure in accordance with the principles of natural justice and copies of the enquiry record was placed in both the cases i.e. ID 5/92 and ID 83/96. It is also pleaded that the man- agement has not contravened the provisions of Section 33 (3 ) of the I.D. Act and no prior approval is required before imposing the punishment on the applicant by the disciplinary authority.

3. Rejoinder was also filed by the applicant reiterat- ing the claim made in the complaint .

6. WW2 Gurdarshan Singh tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex . W 18 and subjected to cross - examination. During cross-examination he deposed that he knew about Ex . 15 and W17 and Harjit Singh being Assistant Secre- tary of the Union and not Assistant General Secretary . He further deposed that Mr. Mann might have posted those letters personally but the envelops were not prepared in his presence . He conceded that with regard to with these two letters no agenda was ever circulated to the Union.

4. During the proceedings a reference was made under Rule 61 (4 ) of Industrial Disputes Central Rules , 1957 to Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) who gave an award but the said award was quashed by Hon'ble High 2223

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

He stated that he had received notices regarding these meetings but he was not in a position to produce the same. The workman closed the evidence with this .

he denied those signatures too but taking an over all view ofthe situation, I am of the view that the signatures are to be his. I thus proceed to decide the whole case after concluding the signatures of Mr. H.S. Mann to be on Ex.W15 and W17 .

9. The entire, evidence led by the parties has been carefully examined and have also heard the parties at length. It is observed specifically that although a complete procedure regarding nomination of protected workman has beenprovided in Rule 61 of Industrial Disputes ( Central) Rules 1957but the workman has miserably failed to prove the same in the instant case. Nevertheless a denial to the authorship and receipt of letters Ex . W15 and 17 , no evidence has been led directly in the shape of a witness who could depose that he posted those letters . The elimentary particulars like agenda of the meeting and minutes thereof for the reasons best known to the workman have not been produced nor the same have been even summoned nor been produced from the Union by the workman. The statutory provision contained in Rule 61 clearly makes it mandatory that the management shall communicate to the Union recognition in writing within 15 daysfromthe receipt of the letter about protected workmen, yet no protest was lodged against the bank nor any action was taken for not doing so by the bank. No reason has been assigned for that in reply to the specific question putby the management to Mr. Arun Ghai. Thus the entire story put forth by the workman runs contrary to the mandate ofRule 61 and the same has gone unproved. The rule 61 runs as follow:

7. The evidence of the management was led by affi- davitofMW1 Harjit Singh Mann who deposed that let- tersEx. W15 and W17 were neither prepared by his union nor despatched and there was no post of Assistant Gen- eral Secretary in the Union. The persons named in these letters too were never nominated as protected workmen and these letters were presumably prepared or copied from the blank letter heads bearing the signatures given by him. He further deposed that in case the same having been sent by him he must have had the copies with him. He was cross-examined by the learned counsel for the workman who suggested to him that he had been charge sheeted and to save himself he had filed his affidavit falsly . The witness was also confronted with Ex . W15 and W17 but MW1 denied his signatures on Ex. W15 and W17. The management further examined MW2 Kanwar Ashok Kumar who deposed that he had personally received the regis- tered letter No. 356 on 23-4-1998 which contained the eleven page letter ofMr. Arun Ghai which has alread been exhibited. It was suggested that in the delivery book in which the witness signed while receiving the letter the writingwas in two different inks and there was some over- writingwhich the witness denied specifically. Lastly, the management examined Mr. P.K. Kohli as MW3 who de- posed that during his tenure in the relevant period, no list ofprotected workmen was published . He further deposed thatno letter dated 9-9-1997 Ex .W15 was ever receivedby thebank and Ex. W17 letter dated 20-4-1998 was also not received by his section and he gave the detail of the pro- cedure of receipt ofDAK in Circle Office . He also deposed that this exercise is taken care of at Head Office level . Thereafter the management also closed its evidence.

"61. Protected Workmen ( 1 ) Every registered trade union connected with an industrial establishment towhich the Act applies , shall communicate to the employer before the (30th April ) every year, the names and addresses of such of the officers of the Union who are employed in that establishment and who , in the opinion of the union should be recognised as ' protected workmen' . Any change in the incumbency of any such officers shall be communicated to the employer by the union within fifteen days of such change.

(2) The employer shall subject to Section 33 , sub- section (4), recognise such workmen to be ' protected workmen' for the purpose of sub - section (3 ) of the said section and communicate to the union, in writing, within fifteen days of the receipt of the names and addresses under sub - rule ( 1 ) , the list of workmen recognised as protected workmen (for the period of twelve months from the date of such communication) .

(3) Where the total number of names received by the employerunder sub-rule (1) exceeds the maximum number of protected workmen, admissible for the establishment, under Section 33 , sub- section (4 ) the 8. After the parties closed their evidence, the Petitioner moved an application for leading additional evidence by getting signatures on Ex.W15 Ex. W17 examined from a Handwriting expert. Bank on the other hand has filed a reply and there after parties addressed their oral submissions on that application. The point upon which the additional evidence is sought to be led about genuineness of signatures of Mr. H.S. Mann on these two documents is yet to be decided by the Tribunal . In case it is decided by the Tribunal that for a fair adjudication of the matters at issue , the examination of signatures from a expert is necessary, the permission should be accorded for leading the additional evidence but if the same is not considered necessary, the additional evidence shall not be permitted to be led. The matter has been examined by me in the light of the evidence led. The perusal of the evidence particularly the testimony of Mr. H. S. Mann reveals that his denial about signatures is not specific . He has deposed that the signatures appears to be resembling with his signatures . Although during corss - examination, [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

2224

नई दिल्ली 13 अप्रैल , 2004

employer shall recognise as protected workmen only such maximum number of workman ;

का.आ. 1123 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल आई सी आफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली नं. II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 43/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17012/53/94- आई.आर.( बी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी Provided that where there is more than one registered trade union in the establishment , the maximum number shall be so distributed by the employer among the unions that the numbers of recognised protected workmen in individual unions bear roughly the same proportion to one another as the membership figures ofthe unions . The employer shall in that case intimate in writing to the President of the Secretary of the union the number of protected workmen allotted to it ;

New Delhi , the 13th April, 2004 Provided further that where the number of protected workmen allotted to a union under this sub - rule falls short of the number of officers of the union seeking protection , the union shall be entitled to select the officers to be recognised as protected workmen . Such selection shall be made by the union and communicated to the employer within five days of the receipt of the employers letter.

S.O. 1123. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Gov- ernment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 43/92) of the Central Govemment Industiral Tribunal New Delhi No. II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-04-2004,

[No. L- 17012/53/94 - IR(B -II) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

(4) When a dispute arises between an employer and any registered trade union in any matter connected with the recognition of ' protected workmen ' under this rule, the dispute shall be referred to the [any Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) or ] Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) concerned, whose decision thereon shall be final .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : CUM LABOUR COURT- IL, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEWDELHI

LD. No. 43/92 .

Presiding Officer : R.N. Rai .

In the Matter of:

O.P. Dhingra

Versus

LifeInsurance Coporation of India

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 17012/ 53/94/IR B- II/Central Govt. dt . 20-3-95 has referred the fol- lowing points for adjudication. The points runs as here- under: -

It is thus not possible to accept the status of the workinan as a protected workman. The recognition by the employer is thus necessary . The workman has not proved any such evidence as may establish that the workman was recognised by the bank as a Protected workmen' . Evidently there is a dispute in respect of the nomination of the protected workman . The union concerned should have been taken up the matter under rule 61 (4) of the I.D. (Central ) Rules 19:57 with Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) and in absence of any dispute having been raised by the Union if the workman raise this dispute and that too in proceedings U/ s . 33 -A of the I.D. Act . Confronted with this situation , in the absence of proof by cogent documentary evidence as it exist in such cases, the claim of the workman of the ' protected workman ' can not be accepted. It is established principle of law that where documentary evidence of a fact exists , oral evidence of that fact may not carry weight and may not be admissible. The complaint filed by the workman under Section 53 -A of the I.D. Act . 1947 is , therefore, liable to be rejected. Thus the same is rejected.

"Whether the action of the management of LIC, New Delhi in not promoting Shri O.P. Dhingra, HGA, to the post of Asstt . Administrative Officer w.e.f. 1-7-1987 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the said workman entitled to?"

Central Govt . be informed for publication in the .gazettee.

Chandigarh .

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In his state- ment of claim. He has stated that he was a member of insurance worker's organization affiliated to B.M.S. and is presently working as higher grade Asstt . Since January , S.M. GOEL, Presiding Officer

11-3-2004 2225

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1982 at Delhi divisional office , Jeevan Prakesh Building, 25, K.G. Marg, New Delhi .

That the workman worked as Asstt . From 1962 to December, 1982 and was promoted to the cadre ofH.G.A. on 1-1-82 . The workman is a law Graduate and fellow of Insurance Institute of India, the highest qualification in insurance.

That he became eligible for the post ofAsstt . Ad- ministrative officer since 1-1-87 as per LIC promotion regu- lation 1076 after completing 5 years in the cadre of HGA .

had worked much in Hindi. In pursuance of that recom- mendation, the promotion was made. The case ofShri N.K. Sharma came up for consideration . He has encouraged theuse ofHindi in the Delhi Divisional office consisting of several hundreds of employees. He had conducted countlessHindi workshops and training Sessions to edu- catethe employees/officers in the matter of usage ofHindi forofficialpurposes . He has also arranged and conducted some of the best Hindi Samelans year after year where many national and international celebrities had partici- pated so he has promoted the cause of Hindi . The allega- tions of the statement of claim is not correct.

Ithas been further submitted that these promotion regulations were amended and were notified in October, 1987. The workman was eligible for the post of A.A.O. under the amended regulations also . He was not promoted inspite of his qualifications.

The workman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has denied all the allegations of the written statement and said that discriminatory promotion was given to Shri N.Κ. Sharma. He has not taken part in any Hindi Samelan . He hasnot encouraged worked in Hindi . It is all baseless. No record regarding the same has been filed.

Heard the arguments from both sides and perused the pspers ofthe records.

Ithas been further submitted that Shri N.K. Sharma was promoted on 1-1-1991 by LIC of India from the cadre H.G.A. to the post A. A.O. by putting at stake all the rules and regulations ofLIC in force and ignoring the claim of aggrieved workman.

Shri N.K. Sharma was promoted by superseding hundreds of employees working in LIC of India even though Shri N.K. Sharma was not eligible for the post of A.A.O. as on 1-9-1991 as per promotion regulations 1987. Shri N.K. Sharma is only a third division graduate from Punjab University whereas the workman is B.A. (HONS) LLb as stated above and much senior to Shri N.K..Sharma .

It was argued on behalf of the workman that Gov- ernment of India has passed Promotion regulation under Section 48 (2) of LIC Act, 1956 , statutory in character. The whole procedure and eligibility conditions are provided in the regulations . LIC has no power to supersede or tamper withany ofregulations due to Section (2) CC of LIC Act, 1956 (as amended in 1981 ) . Promotion regulation of 1987, which is a later date will prevail and not staff regulation 1960 (in case of conflict ) . Promotions are service condi- tions. Any change in it are subject to Section 9A of ID Act, 1947.

As per the Promotion regulation, 1987 an HGA became eligible to the AAO after completion ofminimum of5 years of service as HGA on the date ofNotification of vacancies . After attaining the eligibility the candidate is interviewed as per the procedure laid down in these regu- lations . Shri N.K. Sharma has not completed 5 years ser- vice despite all these facts he was promoted. It has been further submitted that the workman made representations but no reply was received.

Itwas further submitted that no promotion process was valid or declared. No vacancies were declared. No sanction of the post which is essential under Section 4 ( I ) ofpromotion Regs. 1987. The management admitted this fact in cross examination on 5-6-1997 on their affidavit dated 15-4-1997 . Sanction of post are preliminary condi- tions as has been declared in CGIT Award in 1986.

That the workman and the union made oral repre- sentation with the management for reconsideration of their decision and to promote the workman. In spite of several requests , the management of LIC has failed to give any reason for rejecting the claim of the workman,

Itwas further submitted that no scheme like promo- tion as incentive for work in Hindi was formulated, pub- lished and declare by the management if there is any change in service conditions , it was necessary to give notice under Section 9A of the ID Act , 1947 but no such notice was given by the management .

The matter was refused to the ALC and the same has been sent for consideration.

The management has filed written statement.

It was also submitted that according to the promo- tion regulations 1987 , minimum of 5 years is required for promotion to Asstt . Administrative Officer from higher gradeAsstt . Sh . N.K. Sharma has compieted only 3 years sohewas not eligible for promotion . Exceptions have been provided to SC/ST candidates when sufficient number of eligible candidates are not available.

Ithas been further submitted that from the side of theworkman, he is more senior and qualified. He is (BA) It has been submitted that the promotion of Shri N.K. Sharma was in accordance with the rules and regula- tions ofthe corporation and there has not been any dis- crimination. The corporation was required to formulate incentive scheme for the employee carrying out their work inHindi . Acommittee of the Hon'ble Members ofthepar- liament have advised that priority be given to thosewho 2226

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8, 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

engaged in implementation of progressive use of official language in the Corporation.

Hons in Hindi , L.LB and fellow of insurance institute of India, highest qualification in insurance whereas Sh . N.K. Sharma is simply a graduate having no such qualification. Neither Sh. N.K. Sharma nor anybody else was called for interview in the instant case. Sh . N.K. Sharma was pro- moted due to his proximity with the then Prime Minister Sh. P.V. Narshima Rao the rulingparty.

This fact was given in the affidavit of the workman and the managment did not refute this fact in the cross examination.

The matter was discussed at length by the Execu- tive Committee at meeting held on 30th August, 1991 and the approved the proposal that at each Zonal office one such employee out of the employees recommended by each Zonal Office engaged in implementation of the pro- gressive use ofofficial language, be promoted. Acircular vide annexure " A" was issued by the Central Office. Bombay whereby all the Zonal offices, i.e. Madras , Hyderabad, Calcutta, Kanpur, New Delhi and Bombaywere requested to furnish a list of employees in the cadre of HigherGradeAsstt. Working in the Zonal and Divisonal Offices forgrantof incentives , including by way ofpro- motion, who have contributed remarkably in the field of implementation of official language alongwith the recom- mendations for the same . Shri Sharma was also a founder member of the well known cultural -cum-social organiza- tionknown as "Bhasa Bharati " which among othersen- courages the promotion of Hindi as national language .

Ithas been further submitted by the management that theExecutive Committee may , in the interest of the Corporation, for reasons to be specified in its resolution, relax any of the provisions of these regulation in indi- vidual cases .

facts and circumstances of this case .

The reference is replied thus:

Sh. N.K. Sharma was not doing any work in the of- fice as he was declared duty free, but was always busy withhis political connections. This fact was also given in the workman's affidavit which was not refuted by the man- agement. The LIC auditors also pointed out this fact in their audit report of 1992-1993, the copy ofwhich has been annexed with the record. It has been further submitted that it is a unfair labour practice under Clause of 9 of schedule 5 of ID Act, 1947. The act of the management was illegal . It is void abinitio . From the side of the work- man 1997 LAB I.C. 2097, has been cited. It has been de- claredthat promotion likewise in employment in the pub- lic undertaking is public property. In 2000(7) SC scale (Page 336) and AIR 1992 SC 2130 and 1994 SC2166. AIR 1991 page 204 and 20.5 were cited by the management. I have gone through all the citations of the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is apparent from the citations that extraneours consideration should not be adopted for promoting one candidate and ignoring the other candidate. Any appointment made to the service shall be in accordance with the statutory rules and also the guidelines laid down thereunder . Any appointments made without following the satutory law cannot be regularised.

The action ofthe management of LIC, New Delhi in notpromoting Shri O.P. Dhingra , HGA to the post of Asstt . Administrative Officer w.e.f. 1-7-1987 is neither legal nor justified. His case for promotion should be considered alongwith Shri N.K. Sharma.

The award is given accordingly . Dated: 26-03-04 R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1124.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 149/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Ithas also been held in AIR 1994 that in case pro- cess of selection is conceived in fraud, and delivered in deceipt, the entire selection is liable to be set aside. It has also been held in this case if the process is found to be arbitrary , compensation may given to him. It has been fur- ther submitted that under rule 5 ofregulations of 1987, the Chairman is vested with the power to consider the cases or a person who has good in the field of sports and na- tional and international award winner in the field of cul- tural, literary or scientific activity may be promoted to the next higher grade. It was argued by the workman that no such certificate has been attached with the record which shows that Shri N.K. Sharma has received any award of national status or international character.

[सं. एल-12011/288/2000- आई.आर. (बी- II ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th April , 2004

S.O. 1124.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Itwas arged from the side of the management that the promotion of Mr. N.K. Sharma was done as their sub committee ofthe committee of Parliament on official lan- guage. While inspecting the Central Office , Bombay on 17th September, 1990, desired the Corporation to give pri- ority to an incentive scheme for the employees who are 2227

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 149/ 2001) of the Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in relation to the man- agement of UCO Bank of India and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 12-04-2004.

[No. L -12011 /288/2000- IR(B - II) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBU-

NAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

PresidingOfficer:

Shri S. M. Goel ,

Case No. L.D. 149/2001

The General Secretary,

UCOBank Employees Union,

to the workman. It is further pleaded that the enquiry officer was not independent and impartial officer and he wasworking as immediate subordinate to the disciplinary authority. The enquiry proceedings were not held in ac- cordance with the procedure and proper opportunity was not afforded to the workman during the enquiry to defend himself and the objection raised were not recorded and this has caused prejudice to the workman . The enquiry officer gave his findings in baised manner and the same were not based upon evidence on record . The disciplin- ary authority did not apply its mind to the facts and circmustances of the case and show cause notice of dismissal was given which was replied by the workman and without considering the reply the extreme penality of dismissal was imposed upon the workman . The appeal of the workman was also dismissed as a routine matter and without recording any reasons . It is thus prayed that the enquiry may be declared as vitiated and the workman be reinstated in service with full backwages and other ben- efits of service as the enquiry was bad and the workman was not allowed reasonable opportunity to defend him- self.

CentralOffice,

C/o U.C.O. Bank, G.T. Road,

: Applicant.

Jalandhar (Pb .) .

Vs.

UCO. Bank,

The Zonal Manager,

UCO Bank, Zonal Office, SCO 1892-93 , Sector-22-B , Chandigarh.

Appearances

: Shri R.K. Walia

Forthe Workman

: Shri N.K. Zakhmi

For theManagement

AWARD

(Passed On 31-03-2004)

Central Government, vide notification No. L- 12011/ 288/2000 - IR(B - II) dated 28th March, 2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Asstt. General Manager, UCO Bank in dismissing the services to Shri Naresh Kumar is just and legal ? If not, what reliefthe con- cerned workman is entitled to and from which date?"

3. The management in written statement pleaded that the workman is guilty of serious acts of misconduct for which he was served with the charge sheet on 19-3-1999 . The first charge against the workman was that on5-11-1998 he applied for casual leave for 6-11-1998 for taking part in "Dharna " which was denied by the branch manager and the workman remained absent on 6-11-1998 and he was marked absent by the branch manager. On 7-11-1998 the workman tempered with the attendance register and marked himself as present in the attendance Register and then he unauthorisedly marked casual leave on 6-11-1998 in the register. The 2nd charge is that on 7-11-1998 he was asked to officiate vice assis- tantmanager but he refused to work as vice assistant and refused to perform his duty as such and on the contrary hewrotewrong narration in the office order himself ques- tioning the bonafide of the manager . The 3rd charge is . that on 4-12-1998 he shut the door of the strong room delibrately when Mr. P.S. Saini (Handicaped person) who was assistant manager of the branch was inside and the doorwas opened when Mr. Saini was about to faint and the 4th charge was that he threw the cash of the customer when the same was brought at late hours and also thrashed the chief cashier of the branch. He was served with the charge sheet and the reply was not found satisfactory. The enquiry officer was appointed to enquire into the charges . The enquiry officer after conducting a fair and proper enquiry and after giving full opportunity to the petitioner to prove his innocence reached to the conclu- sion that all the charges levelled against the petitioner were duly proved. The workman was given full Opportu- nityto cross -examine the withnesses of the management. The enquiry was conducted in accordance with the prin- 2. In the claim statement it is pleaded by the work- manthat he was appointed as clerk in UCO Bank on 2-8- 1982 in clerical grade and he was placed under suspen- sion inan illegal manner on 8-12-1998 without any charge sheet and enquiry . The bank had issued show cause no- tice on 13-1-1999 . The reply was not considered by the bank and enquiry officer was appointed . The enquiry of- ficer did not hold the enquiry in accordance with the establishedprocedure and even the notice was not given 2228

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

ciples of natural justice . The enquiry officer submitted his report and the disciplinary authority after examining the various documents and looking into the gravity of the misconduct issued a show cause notice of dismissal and personal hearing was also given and after considering all the material on record passed the order of dismissal on 30-11-1999. The appeal of the workman was also rejected by the appellate authority but the dismissal was substi- tuted with the penalty of removal from service. It isprayed that the order of removal from service . is based on the legal and just enquiry and during the enquiry proceed- ings principles of natural justice has not been violated and there is no merit in the present reference and the same deserves rejection as the punishment imposed is propor- tionate to the gravity of the misconduct of the workman .

4. Rejoinder was also filed by the workman reiterating almost the same facts as pleaded in the claim statement .

misappropriation of funds etc. and the penalty imposed upontheworkman is very harsh and extreme in as much as the workman has unblemished record of service up to thedate ofthe incident from the year 1982 and this Tribu- nal is competent enough U/S 11 -A ofthe I.D. Act 1947 to have mercy on the applicant. It is admitted case of the parties that there is no fraud or misappropriation ofbank's money, and the punishment ofremoval from service; in my opinion is harsh one and disproportionate to the alleged mosconduct particularly when there are no charges of fraudetc. Therefore , taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case in hand exercising my power andjurisdiction U /S 11 -A of the I.D. Act, interference is called forby this Tribunal in the punishment aspect ofthe matter. Therefore, the end ofjustice would be met if the punishment of removal is substituted with that of stop- page of four increments for one year but the intervening periodwillbe counted for all purposes except the work- manwill not be entitled for wages for the period from the date ofdismissal to the date ofpassing of the award. The management is directed to reinstate the workman within one month from the date ofpublication ofthe Award. The reference is answered accordingly. Central Govt . be in- formed.

5. The management submitted the entire enquiry pro- ceedings and the parties were heard on the fairness ofthe conduction of the enquiry proceeding by the enquiry officer as it is alleged by the applicant that the enquiry was not conducted in fair and proper manner.

S. M. GOEL PresidingOfficer

Chandigarh

नईदिल्ली 13 अप्रैल, 2004.

का.आ. 1125.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 29/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12012/355/93- आई.आर. (बी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 13thApril, 2004

S.O. 1125.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 29/94) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CanaraBank and their workman, which was received by theCentralGovemment on 12-04-2004.

6. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and have also gone through the entire record and com- plete enquiry proceedings . The learned counsel for the workman has argued that the enquiry was conducted in a biased manner and the same deserves to be vitiated as the same was conducted by the person who was immedi- ate subordinate to the disciplinary authority. The learned counsel for the workman fails to point out as to how and in what manner the same caused prejudice to the work- man so as to declare the enquiry as vitiated. I have gone brough the entire enquiry proceedings . The workman has participated fully in the enquiry proceedings. He has cross -examined the witnesses of the management and full opportunity was given to him to defend himself during the entire enquiry proceedings . The show cause notice of proposed punishment was given to the work- man. He was also allowed personal hearing. The appel- late authority also allowed personal hearing to the work- man before rejecting his appeal . Even the counsel for the workman also failed to point out any irregularity in the conduction of the proceedings which caused prejudice to the workman and is damaging to him so as to declare the enquiry as vitiated .Therefore, in my considered opin- ion, the enquiry has been conducted by the enquiry of- ficer in accordance with the principles ofnaturaljustice and the workman was allowed full opportunity to defend himself. Therefore, it is held that the enquiry is proper and the same has been conducted in accordance with the set procedure .

[No. L-12012/355/93 - IR(B- II)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer 7. The learned counsel for the workman has further argued that the workman has not been guilty of any fraud, 2229

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाखবাৰ 18,192618, 1926.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

ANNEXURY

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT AT CHANDIGARH

Shri SM. Goolch

Presiding Officermin

Case No. ID. 2

by the discipliary authority and the appeal was abo jected by the appletate authority wiitiour applying in mind Theapplicant thus prayed that the punishment imposed upon the workman be set aside and the incrementsbe restored and also release the balance pay minus subsis tence allowance. By declaring the enquiry, as print the principle of naturaljica Riboon

Amarjit Singh C/o Arun GhafC.C. Member, Chinara Bank Unton, 1662, Rari Mohalla, Ludhiana

Applicant

versus

Regional Manages, Canara Bank, Sector- 17, Chandigarh

Respondent

APPEARANCES :

Shri J.G. Verma

For the Workman

Shri V.K. Garg

For the Managment

AWARD

(Passed on 11-3-2004)

Central Govt. vide notification No.L-12012/355/ 93.IR(B.2) dated 25th of March, 1994 has reformed the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudications (一 )

"Whether the action of the management of CanaraBank, Chandigarh in imposing the punishment of stoppage of two annual in crements on Shri Amarjit Singh, Clerk-cumis Cashier vide order dated 30-9-88 is justified? If not, what relief is the said workmanen titled to

Gulnorition statement the management has pleaded that the applicant was placed under suspension on 3-2-1984 in cennoction with serious misconduct ofa- handling the manager Shri A.K. Sawhney and a police case was registered and a chargo shost dated 17-4-1984 was also served on the applicant . It was alleged in the charge sheet that on ,2-2-1984 at 10-15a, m, the applicant entered in the Zonal office of Laxmi Commercial Bank in a drunkon condition and ontored in the cabin ofArea Manager Mr. Sawhney and threatened his to end his life by holding his neck and by abusing in filthy language . After he was taken out of the, cabin by the staff members heattempted tobreak the locked cabin door,He also tom- pered with the attendange register by marking his pres ence for thewhole day. The onquiry officer, waswas appointed by erstwhile Laxmi Commercial Bank but the enquiry was stopped as criminal trial was going on.gon. The criminal court acquitted the appliapplicant on 2-1-1987. The manage ment admitted that the charge sheet was modified and the enquiry officer afterafter completing the enquiry spbmit- ting his findings holding the employee guiltyguilty of the charges except allegation contained in para 5 of the charge sheet. The disciplinary authority imposed the punish- ment ofof stoppage of two increments for allegations con- tained inparas 1 , 2,2, 4 and 6 and warning was imposed for para 3 and for para 5 of the charge the applicant was exonerated vide order dated 30-9-1988 . It is pleaded that the enquiry was conducted indin fair and proper manner and principles of natural justice have been adhered to and due procedure was followed. The request for adjournment of the enquiry proceeding was not consideredL'asas ititwaswa only todelay the enquiry. It is admitted by the management that no presenting officer was appointed to put forth the case ofthe management but it is pleaded that no preju- dicehas been caused. It is also admitted that no show cause notice was given before inflicting the punishment and the disciplinary authority imposedimposed the punishment on the basis of the record. It is further pleaded that the punishment imposed upon the workman is just and ap- propriate and the applicant is not entitled to any relief the reference deserves rejection.

4. Replication was also filed by the applicant roiterating the clein made in the claim petition.

5.Both the parties in suppert of their respective pleadings filed their affilavis. Siice the pumishimont Wik imposed upon the worlonan after conducting departmentid enquiry agabist the workain, therefore, this Tribunal is first to seo whether the miqttry odistinctiod is fait and proper and whether conducted in accordance with the 2.In claim statefient it is pleaded that thework- manwas suspended by the management ofLaxmi Com mercial Bank Lttf on 3-2-1984 and Sri A.K. Sawhney Area Manager also got registered a police case against the workman and he was also issued chargesheet dated 17-4-1984. The management ofLaxmi Commercial Bank violated the provisions of law with respect to procedure ofdisciplinary action and the enquiry war stopped till the decision by the Court in the criminal case. The applicant was finallyacquitted ofthe charges by the Criminal Court on2-1-1987 . Lateron the Laxmi Commercial Bank was, mergedwith the Canara Bank. The inanagement of the Canara Bank instituted enquiry and the earlier charge: sheetwhich was issued by the westwirilis Laxmi Comic cial Bankwhich was against the provisions of law as laid down in Chapter 19 of the Bipartite Settlement, the works manwas not given proper opportunity ofdefence during the enquiry proceedings and even the request on medical ground was turned down. The enquiry was also held at Karnal faroffplace from the occurrence and the eriquity officer conducted the enquiry quasi exparte. The principle of natural justice was also violated and the en qairy officer was also acting as enquiry officer cani-pro- senting officer. The enquiry officer also proposed and recommended the posishment which was finally imposed

1344 G1/04-8 2230

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8, 2004/VAISAKHA 18, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] principles of natural justice and the workman had been allowed proper opportunity during the enquiry to defend himself.

8. I have gone through the rival contentions ofthe parties and have gone through the enquiry proceedings and other related documents of the case. I have also persued thejudgement referred to by the Learned counsel fortheworkman and also the judgement of the criminal court inwhich theworkman was acquitted. The applicant wastried for the office as mentioned in the chargesheet issuedby the bank. The Criminal Court has held that the workmanwas not present at the place of occurance and hewas present in the BangaBranch of theBank from10 AMto 5 PM. The attendance register ofthe bank was not produced in this Tribunal also and not in the enquiry proceedings. Itwas held by the Criminal Court that the applicant was present in his bank branch and not at the placewhere thealleged incident has tookplace. Therefore, the evidence recorded ofthe alleged victim Mr. Sawhney that the workman was present holds no ground and it cannot be said thất the workman was present-in his branch and not at the place of occurence especially when the attendance register shows the presence of the workman from 10 AM to 5 PM. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the anthority referred to above has held that where the applicant is acquitted by a judicial pronouncementwith the finding that the raid and recovery at the residence of the appellant was not proved it would be unjust, unfair and rather oppressive to allow the findings recordedat thedepartmental proceedings to stand. In the case inhand also, by acquitting the applicant in a criminal case on the plea that the workman was not present at the place of олгани ай 10-15AM and linkwas present 40 Kms away at 10 AM to 5 PM, the enquiry proceedings holding that workman was present at the place of occurence and misbehaved with the Area Manager can not be sustained and enquiry is vitiated on this ground alone.

6.Arguments have been heard on behalf of the parties onfaimess of the enquiry . The learned rep. of the workman has argued that first of all the management of Canara Bank modified the chargesheet which was originally served by the earstwhile Laxmi Commercial Bank which is against the provisions of the Bipartite Settlement. It is further argued that the bank has not appointed any presenting officer and the enquiry officer had also acted as presenting officer and produced the evidence and documents himself and thus the enquiry officer acted partially and this has caused great prejudice to the applicant in as much as the enquiry was conducted ex-parteand material witness was not allowed to be cross- examined by the enquiry officer . The enquiry officer himself acted as disciplinary authority and the enquiry officer. The enquiry officer had proposed punishment and the hearing was conducted by the enquiry officer himself on the proposed punishment which is against the principles of natural justice and the enquiry should be vitiated on this ground alone . It is further arguedby the learned rep . of the workman that in the same charges the applicant was put on trial in the criminal court and the applicant was acquitted by the trial court and on the same charges the bank management is debarred tohold departmental proceedings again . The leamed rep. of the workman also referred me to the case law of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Camp . M. Paul Anthony : Versus Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. and another reportedin 1999(2) R.S.J. page 318. It is further argued by the learned rep. of the workman that the disciplinary authority has not given any show cause notice before inflicting the punishment and the hearing took place only by the enquiry officer during the enquiry proceedings, therefore, the Management and the enquiry officer has violated the mandatory procedure and the whole enquiry stand vitiated in view of the procedure adopted by the enquiry officer and the management,

7. On the other hand, the learned rep. of the management has argued that due procedure has been adopted by the enquiry officer and the management has every right to modify the chargesheet and the workman was given full opportunity to defend himself during the course of enquiry and there is no ambiguity or illegality in the enquiry proceedings . It is further argued that the punishment is very much in accordance with the gravity ofthemisconduct and the workman is not entitled to any relief. It is further argued by the learned rep . of the management that the bank has every right to conduct departmental proceedings in spite of the fact that the workman was acquitted by the criminal court and the workman is not entitled to any relief in the present reference.

9. It is admitted case of the management that there bi presenting officer was appointed by the bank to plead the case of the management. The enquiry, officer was conducting the enquiry as an enquiry officer as well as presenting officer and the enquiry officer in this case also acted as disciplinary authority in as much as he heard the workman on the proposed punishment . The disciplinary authority has passed the order ofpunishment only.Before inflicting the punishment the disciplinary authority has not given any show cause notice before inflictingthe punishment of stoppage of two increments and other punishment. In view ofthe settled principle of law, the enquiry stands vitiated on this ground also. In the case inhand also, the enquiry officer acted as enquiry officer-cum-presenting officer-cum-disciplinary authority also which goes to show that it is against the principles of natural justice and enquiry being against the principles ofnaturaljustice, the same is vitiated and the punishment imposed on the basis ofthis departmental enquiry is set aside and the workman is held entitled to all the increments which have been stopped with cumulative effect andalso the remaining pay by deducting subsistance भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

allowance during the period of suspensionfrom 3-2-1984. It is pertinent to mention here that the management has not pleaded that in case the enquiry is vitiated on any ground, the management is ready to prove the charges in the court/Tribunal itself. Therefore, it is held that the enquiry is vitiated and the punishment awarded vide letter dated 30-9-1988 is set aside and the workman is held entitled to all the increments and other related service benefits as if there was no punishment awarded,to the workman. The reference is answered accordingly infavour ofthe workman, Central Govt. be informed.

2231 referredthe following point for adjudication. The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank, imposing the two punishments simulta- neously i.e. stoppage of one increment for one year w.c.f. 20-9-1990 and stoppage ofanother increment for six months is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

SM. GOEL, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

नई दिल्ली, 13 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1126.-औधोगिकविवाद अधिनियम. 1947 (1947 का.14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली नं. II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 77/92) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/145/92- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] The claimant has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, he has stated that he was implicated invague, baseless, false cases and inflicted punishment through the process of fake enquiries. He was tried by the different Enquiry Officers and both the officers held hươn guilty and the punishment was inflicted. The concerned Enquiry Officer was a retired military officer. He hadno knowledge ofdisciplinary enquiry . He was on the maxi- mum ofhispay.

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th April, 2004

S.O. 1126. In pursuance of Section 17 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 77/92) of the Central Government Industrial . Tribunal, New Delhi No. - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Indus- trial Dispute between the employers in relation to theman- agement of Canara Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-4-2004 Ithas been further submitted that two enquiries wereheld. Inboth the enquiries , his one increment was reduced. In the first enquiry, his one increment was reduced for 6 months w.e.f. 13-9-1990 and in the other case, paywas reduced to next lower stage for one year operative from w.e.f. 20-9-1990 Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3. Such enquiries are not according to the procedure of bipartitesettlement . He has suffered financial loss.

[No. L - 12012/ 145/92- IR(B -II) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk -Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DLEHI

SHRI R. N. Rai ,

Presiding Officer:

I.D. No. 77/92

In the matter of:- Deepak Khullar VERSUS

Canara Bank

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 12012/ 145/92-IR -B ( II ) Central Government dt. 31-8-92 has 1344 GI/2004-9

The management has filed written statement.All the statement of claims have been denied and it has been stated in the written statement that the customer of the branch filed a complaint and on that complaint, an enquiry was held and the workman was found guilty and his one ncrement was reduced. This complaint was filed on 9-12-1989 and the report was submitted on 17-12-1989 . The copy marked as Annexure M - 2 . The workman participated in the enquiry and it was considered appropriate that his one increment should be stopped for 6months. The case was investigated by Kunwar Ashok Kumarandmanager of the branch and officer of the bank and enquiry proceedings were held properly and the charges levelled against the workman were found correct so punishment was inflicted on him . The claimant exercised the right of appeal but the enquiry and the punishment were found correct in appeal also. It has been further submitted that on 31-3-1990, Shri Deepak Khullar refused to entertain a self drawn cheque for withdrawal ofRs . 70,000/-. He behaved rudely with the customer. The bank lost its reputation. In this connection also . an enquiry was held and punishment was inflicted on 13-9-1990. His one increment was withheld to the next lowergrade.

The workman has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder, he has denied all the statements of the written statement and has asserted that the enquiry was not fair, the bank reducedthe pay scale of the workman at two stages which is against the bipartite settlement /award.

2232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on record . It was argued that two enquiries were held and his one increment was reduced in both the cases . On 13-09-1990, his pay was reduced for 6 months operating from 13-09-1990 and in the other cases, his pay was reduced to next lower stage for one year operative w.e.f. 20-09-1990 which is Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3. It was argued that during the year 1990. The enquiries were held two times and for the first time , increment ' was reduced for 6 months and for the second time , the increment was reduced for one year. In one year, two enquiries cannot be held. Now the substantial question is whether enquiries in one year two times can be held or not . There are two separate charges by two separate customers levelled against him and very mild punishment has been inflicted, that to after having recourse to fair enquiry. All the papers of the enquiry have been annexed with the record. I have gone through the papers . The workman has not challenged the reduction of salary of 13-09-1990. He has challenged the second enquiry in which the increment has been stopped for 6 months . The enquiry conducted in this case is according to the principles ofnatural justice . He has been afforded proper opportunity since there were two complaints and onboth the complaints, the charge sheets were served on him and proper enquiry was held and the enquiry and the punishment were found correct upto appellate stage. Since his behaviour with the customers was rude on two days so far the different dates enquiries were held . Since the enquiry is proper and according to the principles of natural justice , the workman deserves to no relief.

The reference is replied thus:

The action of the management of Canara Bank imposing two punishments simultaneously i.e. stoppage of one increment for one year w.e.f. 20-09-1990 and stoppage of another increment for six moInths is quite justified. The claimant is not entitled to any relief asked for.

Dated : 19-03-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 13 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1127.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मचारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नई दिल्ली नं. II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 44/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-4-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 12012/262/89- आई. आरं. ( बी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

[PART II-SEC. 3 (іі) ) New Delhi , the 13th April , 2004

S.O. 1127. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 44/91) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal New Delhi No. - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofPunjab National Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-4-2004.

[No. L - 12012/262/89 - IR(B - II)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

* BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DLEHI

Presiding Officer:

Shri R. N. Rai,

I.D. No. 44/97

In the matter of: M. C. JAIN VERSUS

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour vide its letter No.L- 12012/ 262/89 -D2 (A)dt. 20-11-1989 Central Government has referred the following point for adjudication. The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in withdrawing the stagnation increment granted to Shri M.C. Jain, Spl. Assistant Adhoiwala , Dehradun w.e.f. 24-2-1988 is justified ? If not, to what, relief is the workman justified?

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In his statement of claim he has stated that the workman was employed in the opposite party bank since 12-12-1957 at Branch Office, Chandausi and he reached the ceiling of scale on and w.e.f. 21-12-1972 under the provisions of the award and settlement . In terms of clause- I of the third bipartite settlement dt . 8-9-1983 the workman is entitled to a stagation increment only after completing 5 years service after he reaches the maximum in the scale ofpay: but the first such increment will be granted to the employee eligible for stagnation increments , effective from the date onwhich it falls due or from 1-1-1980 whichever is later , but the next increment will accrue to him on completion of five years of service as from the date of the first stagnation increment falls due but not earlier than 1-1-1981 .

2233

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , , 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

24-2-1988 and order for making the recovery. The first stagnation increment is not in consonance with the B.P.S. dated 08-09-1983 because Shri M.C. Jain was promoted as Accountant on and w.e.f. 26-12-1973 and he, declining his Officer cadre post of his own, requested reversion to clerical cadre which was granted and effected form 1-3-1984 .

It has been further submitted that in view of these provisions , the workman is entitled to the first stagnation increment from 21-12-1977 but in view of the aforesaid provisions of the B.P.S. that increment would have become ue after the second stagnation increment would have becomedue after the completion of five year's service from the actual due date of the first stagnation increment i.e. from 21-12-1982 .

That withdrawing the first stagnation increment of Rs . 95/- is arbitrary and violative of the provisions of the Bipartite settlement dated 08-09-1983 , because Shri M.C. Jain was never offered any promotion to the Officer Cadre after the signing of the said settlement on 08-09-1983 as such question of refusal to accept any such offer of promotion by Shri Jain does not arise .

That after reaching the maximum in the scale of pay, Shri M.C. Jain was promoted to the post of Accountant onnd w.e.f. 26-12-1973 and served the bank as such till 28-02-1984 , whereafter he was reverted to the clerical cadre on his own request based on medical and compassionate grounds .

Ithas been further submitted that the workman is entitled to receive additional increments for educational qualifications, the maximum of 5 increments on account of being a graduate and having passed completed both the parts of CAIIB , w.e.f. 1-3-1984 the date on which his reversion to clerical cadre was effected but the bank refused to pay on the ground that the workman remained officer, he was not entitled to all the five increments manifestly anuntenable plear Consequently , an Industrial Dispute was espoused bose the Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Central) Dehradun failing which this case has been referred to this Tribunal.

Thatthe action of the management in withdrawing stagnation increment granted to Shri M.C. Jain w.e.f 24-2-1988 is violative of the well settled Principles of Natural Justice. The action of the management in withdrawing the stagnation increment granted to the workman without serving notice of change in service conditions is illegal and unjustified to allow payment of stagnation increment w.e.f. the date of reversion to the clerical cadre which is 1-3-1984 in terms of clause- 1 of the third BPS dt. 8-9-1983 and to award entire costs of the case which has been forcibly thrusted upon the poor workman by arbitrary withdrawing the already granted stagnation increment and to award such other reliefs and benefits as deemed proper and expedient in the facts and circumstances.

During the course of proceedings , the management filed its written statement. It has been stated in their written statement that the workman concerned will be allowed special allowance in view of the his educational qualifications in terms of provisions of the Bipartite Settlement from the date of his reversion to the clerical cadre w.e.f. 1-3-1984 .

The management has filed written statement . In the writtenstatement, it has been stated that if any difficulty arises regarding the interpretation of any settlement , matter will be taken up only at the level of Indian bank's Association and the National Confederation of the Bank Employees , for discussion and settlement .

That it has been further somitted that after his reversion to the clerical cadre, the concerned workman has been requesting the management to release the stagnation increment w.e.f. 1-3-1984. He wrote letter in 1987 but it was communicated to him that he is not entitled to stagnation, increment in view of circular No. 730 dt . 17-10-1983 . He received two more letters in which it has beenwritten that since Shri M. C. Jain has completed only one year service in clerical cadre at the ceiling stage, he isrequired to put in four year's service in clerical cadre after his reversion on and w.e.f. 1-3-1984 in clerical cadre so as to become eligible for the release of first stagnation increment in February , 1988 only. The decision of the management is arbitrary.

That the first increment may be released w.e.f. 1-3-1984 . The first stagnation increment was given to him w.e.f. 24-2-1988 for having completed 5 years of service at the ceiling of pay in the clerical cadre, but the management abruptly took a decision to stop the first stagnation increment sanctioned to the workman w.e.f.

In fact the PNB Employees Union (UP) which has raised this dispute is affiliated to the National Confederation of Bank Employees , one of the signatory ofthe above settlements . Hence it was mandatory for them to first abide themselves with the above provisions of the settlement because of the fact that , as contended before the conciliation Authority also , the matter relates to divergent interpretation of Rules of the BPSdt. 08-09- 1983 and, therefore, it was incumbent upon the union to take up the matter before the IBA first before, invoking the jurisdiction of provision of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The other parts of the claim has been denied. it has been admitted, in the written statement that he joined service in the bank on 11-2-1957 . He was promoted to the post of accountant in Grade ' C ' on 26-12-1973 and on his own request dated 23-1-1984 , sought reversion to the post of clerk and joined as such on 1-3-1984 after remaining Accountant upto 28-2-1984 from 26-12-1973 .

2234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004 /VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

Meanwhile on 08-09-1983 , a settlement was signed between the Bank and the Unions whereby the employees in Clerical cadre were entitled to two stagnation increments @ equivalent to last increment drawn after putting in 5 years service after reaching the maximum of the scale of pay , subject to certain other conditions.

That in terms of the provisions of the settlement dt. 08-09-1983 Shri Jain would not be entitled for any stagnation increment, however , on account of in advertent error one stagnation increment was released in favour of Shri Jain w.e.f. 24-2-1988 . Since he was not entitled to stagnation increment so the stagnation increment granted to him was withdrawn on 12-09-1988 and it was withdrawn under the settlement dt . 08-09-1983 . No notice under Section 9A was given as it was not required for effecting such change in terms of a settlement of award.

In para 4 and 5 under the facts of the case , no notice was nouired to be given. The workman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder. he has stated that the increment was abruptly withdrawn . The facts of the instant case do not create any obligation on the part of the Union to make any reference to IBA or NCBE , however , in the circumstances ofthe case it was obligatory on the part of the O.P. to make reference to IBA to seek clarification of interpretation because it was the O.P. who has wrongly interpreted the settlement clauses and stopped paying stagnation increments and withdrawn the said increment grantedto the workman. He has denied all the allegations of the written statement and stated that his stagnation increment was illegally withdrawn and he is entitled to get stagnation increment .

Heard arguments from both the parties . Both the parties have filed written arguments. Heard them orally.

It isadmitted that in 1988 , first stagnation increment was granted to the workman but it was granted by mistake and in view of the settlement of 1983 , it was again withdrawn. It was further stated by the learned counsel for the workinan that the workman was promoted on the post ofaccountant in 1973 and accordingly had completed one year of service in stage of ceiling ofthe clerical cadre. For his entitlement of Stagnation increment in accordance ofP.D Circular No. 730 dated 17-10-1983 consequent to his reversion as Clerk/Typist in the year 1984, he is required to put in 4 years of service at the stage of ceiling i.e. Rs . 1040/- and as such will be eligible for release of his first Stagnation increment in February , 1988 only .

Heard arguments from both the sides and persue the records.

It is admitted that the workman was appointed ding the month of December , 1957. He remained accountant upto 28-2-1984. In the meantime settlement 1. 08-09-1983 was signed. The counsel for the workman

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] argued that stagnation increment could not be given to an employee who at any time after the commencing of the settlement after being offered and are selected for promotion refused to accept such promotion. It was submitted that this provision is for those persons who are promoted and refused to accept the promotion but in the case of this employee , he was already promoted on 26- 12-1973 . In this provision , there is no mention that the person who has been previously promoted will also be affectedby this provision. The case of the workman is not that promotion was offered to him and he was selected for promotion and he refused it instead he was promoted on 26-12-1973 and on compelling grounds on his own request dt . 23-1-1984 , he was reverted to clerical cadre. As such , this provision of bipartite settlement is not applicable to this workman.

It was further submitted by the counsel of the workman that under Section 9A of the I.D. Act . notice of change by the employer must be communicated to the workman but in this case , the workman has not been intimated regarding the notice.

The Learned cousel for the workman drew my attention to 1990 (61 ) FLR 55 in which it has been held that notice under Section 9A is mandatory .

The counsel for the management submitted that the workman is bound by a bipartite settleinent dt . 108-09- 1983.He has refused promotion and notice under Section 9A is not necessary as one increment was given to him inadvertently . In 1992 ( 64 ) FLR 5t) 3 . it has also been held that notice under Section 9A is necessary in case there is some change in the service conditions . On 24-2-1988 the workman was offered one stagnation increment but subsequently that increment was withdrawn . The provision dt . 09-08-1983 is regarding those person who have been promoted or selected for promotion and have refused promotion. It is not applicable to those person who have already worked on promoted post for 11 years and on compelling grounds and on their own request , they were reverted to clerical cadre . As such, the claim of the workman deserves to be allowed . I find no force in the arguments of the management .

The reference is replied thus:-

"The action of the management of Punjab National Bank in withdrawing the stagnation increment granted to Shri M. C. Jain , Spl . Asstt . , Adhoiwala, Dehradun w.e 24-2-1988 is not justified . The workman is entitled to get the stagnation increment according to the provisions before the Bipartite Settlement of 08-09-1983 with a simple interest of 6% per annum.

The Award is given accordingly.

Dated: 2-4-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2235

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8, 2004/वैशाख 18, 1926

नई दिल्ली 13 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1128.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का. 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कानपुर, उ.प्र. के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. 31 ऑफ 1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-04-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/84/89- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th April , 2004

S.O. 1128.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947( of 1947) , the central Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. No. 31 of 1997) of the Central Government Industiral Tribunal/ Labour Court , Kanpur, U.P. now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman, which was received bythe Central Govemment on 12-04-2004.

[No. L -410012/ 84/89 - IR(B - I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Cellman (Electric Foreman) on monthly wages of Rs. 456 . The management has illegally terminated the service of the workman w.e.f. 22-3-77 on the basis of a false allegation without conducting legal domestic inquiry against him . The workman never remained absent from hisduties and the management themselves considered the workman as absence from duty w.e.f. 22-3-77 whereas the workman was on sanctioned leave w.e.f. 22-3-77 . The railway department has issued railway privilege passes nos 370328 and 116699. The workman was charge for misconductdue to absence from duty but the legal domestic inquiry was not conducted and the workman was never served with any chargesheet nor he was ever afforded any opportunityto contest the same. On return after availing the leave the workman continued to attend the place of his posting but he was never given any work nor any payments were made to him . The petitioner filed a case for realization of the amount before the CGIT cum Labour Court , New Delhi , which was rejected vide order dated 17-8-87. The workman thercupon approached the ALC (C) Lucknow against his removal from service but no settlement could be made and a failure of conciliation report was submitted to the appropriate government . The competent authority earlier vide order dated 19-9-87 declinedto refer the dispute which was allowed vide order dated 6-11-96 and the Hon'ble High Court directed the government to reconsider the matter . The government thereupon referred the above industrial dispute for adjudication .

BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, SARVODYA NAGAR , KANPUR , U.P. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 31 OF 1997

In the matter of dispute between :- President

Rashtriya Chaturth Shreni Railway Mazdoor Congress ( Intuc) 2/236 Nammair Agra .

AND

3. The management of railway filed written statement against the statement of claim filed by the workman stating therein that the services of the workman was dismissed after holding a domestic inquiry against his misconduct in not following the directions of the management and instead of giving his joining at the destination, of his posting on promotion the workman remained absent through out. On appeal , however, the appellate authority modified the order of dismissal into removal of service of the workman on the basis of charges levelled against him vide chargesheet dated 22-2-78 for his absence from dutics .

Divisional Railway Manager ( P) Western Railway Jaipur

4. The workman also filed his rejoinder against the written statement filed by the management .

AWARD

1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , vide its notification No. L -41012 /84 /89-1.R. - B - 1 dated 3-1-97 . has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

5. The original dispute referred for adjudication relate to removal of service of the workman w.e.f. 22-3-77 which was amended by the competent authority on application of workman to 22-2-78 .

6. Both contesting parties filed documentary evidence in support of their respective claim and reply and also adduced their pral evidence in support of their cases.

Whether the action of the management of D.R.M. ( P ) Western Railways in removal of Sri Harisewak Lavania Cellman w.e.f. 22-3-77 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?

7. The workman examined himself as w.w.1 and against it on behalf of the management Senior Electrical Engineer Sri Shailendra Saxena wax cxamined as M. W.1 .

2. The petitioner workman filed written statement of claim alleging therein that the petitioner workman Sri Harisewak Lavania was appointed and working as [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 8 , 2004/VAISAKHA 18 , 1926

2236

8. The workman submitted his written arguments against which the management submitted oral arguments .

hat he privilege as Ext.M - 1 to Ext . M - 34. In his crosination by the workman, the witness categor passe bears the date of its issu witness further denied the suggestion of the workman umat chargesheet was never served on the workman or that the proceedings of the inquiry was never served upon the workman .

9. It is not in dispute that the workman Sri Harisewak Lavania worked with the management and that he was dismissed from service by the management and on appeal the punishment of dismissal was modified to 'removal from service .

12. The workman however admitted in his cross examination that all the applications for grant of leave submitted by him were rejected and the intimation of rejection of leave was duly served on the workman after 3 or4 months . He expressed his ignorence about his transfer to Badakui from Agra vide order dated 16-3-77 but he stated that he never refuse to accept the said order.

10. It is contended on behalf of the workman that the workman was never served with the chargesheet and that the management has failed to prove the service of charge sheet as well as service of show cause notice on the workman . The workman in his statement on oath has stated that he was illegally removed from service w.e.f. 22-3-77 whereas he obtained privileges passes from the management a day before that . He further stated that he was, not served with any S.F. 5 nor he was informed about the nomination of the inquiry officer to conduct the inquiry norme is aware as to when the alleged inquiry was held. In his cross examination he admitted that during his absence he moved application for grant of leave but they were never granted. He denied the suggestion given by the management that he was not on leave granted by the management as alleged w.e.f. 22-7-77 . He however admitted that no intimation about the non -grant of leave was given to him. He further denied his knowledge abnout the fact that ylde order dated 16-3-77 he was transferred from Agra to Banclikui railway station . He further denied that he neversed to take the said transfer order .

13. Heard the parties and perused the record and the evidence adduced by parties . From the documentary evidence adduced by the management and not controverted by the workman it is quite clear that the workman never joined the place of his posting on transfer either on promotion or on routine transfer by the department . This fact is fully corroborated by the letters given by the workman dated 19-12-73, 10-4-74 , 29-4-74. 2-5-75 and other letters written by the workman on different dated which are management Ext . nos 1. 2. 3. 4. 7, 11, 16 and these letters written by the workman clearly prove act that on one or the other pretext the workmanhad not complied with the orders of his transfer by the management and the workman wilfully avoided to discharge his duties after reporting his joining at the ansferred plac Even on previous occassions the orkman did not Join at the transferred palce by refusing notds promotions . So far as the knowledge of rejection of lèave is concerned the witness has himself admitted this fact that his prayer for leave applied for was not aceeded to by the department. Mere moving applications for leave does not entitled any workman to absent himself from service. The management has fully proved that the workman despite information to him regarding rejection Olications through registered post did not report transferred place . As such it cannot be said ofle for that the workman had no knowledge about the non grant of leave applied for.

14. Another question arises whether the workman was informed about the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the management and that the workman was given full opportunity to defend himself or not . In this connection the management has filed the enquiry proceedings wherein the workman was fully informed about the proceedings and appointment of enquiry offic but the workman failed to participate in the proceedings and to defend himself. His appeal against the punishment was also duly considered and the punishment reduced admittedly. After considering the entrie evidence on record it is clearly held that the management had acted legally by initiating disciplinary proceedings against the delinquent workman by affording him opportunity to 11. Against this witness of the worman the witness of the management stated that the workman was shown the transfer order on 22-3-77 and thereafter he did report for duty since then nor he was granted any leave for his absence . This witness however admitted that on 5-4-77 an application was received from the workman for grant of leave which was refused and the intimation of refusal of leave was served upon the workman throug letter sent by registered post and the workman was directed to report on duty without fail. The workman however failed to resume duty . On 5-6-77 the workman again applied for grant of leave for 180 days which too was rejected vide order dated 24-6-77 and he was again directed to report on duty. The order was served on him through registered post and the privilege passes were issued to the workman on 24-12-76 and 30-12-76 respectively but the workman failed to utilise them and the workman never travelled on the basis of these passes issued to him by the management . It is further stated by this witness that the workman was charged vide order dated 22-2-78 for his willful absence from duty which continued for about a year and that the workman was directed and served to appear and take part part in the said inquiry . The workman was dismissed form service on the conclusion of me inquiry against him but on appeal the appellate authority modified the punishment as above . the relevant documents have been proved by this witness [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 8 , 2004/वैशाख 18 , 1926

2237 defend himself, the inquiry proceedings do not suffer from any illegality or infirmiry.

employed in any industry in the State ofKarnataka (only) in respect of which the Central Government is the : appropriate Government .

[F. No : A - 11016/3/ 2003 -CLS - II ] YP SEHGAL . Under Secy .

15. Therefore , it is held that the action of the management in removing the workman Sri Hari Sewak Lavalia Cellman with effect from 22-3-77 is legal and justified . The workman is , therefroe , not entitled for any - relief claimed for.

नई दिल्ली 20 अप्रैल, 2004 SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 20 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1130.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 33 ग की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार दिनांक 12-2-2004 की भारत सरकार श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या ए-11016/3/2003 सी एल एस- II द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अंतर्गत गठित श्रम न्यायालय , एर्नाकुलम को उस श्रम न्यायालय के रूप में निर्दिष्ट करती है जो उस राशिकी निर्धारण करेगा जिस पर उस उप- धारा में उल्लिखित किसी लाभ की गणना केरल राज्य और संघ शासति क्षेत्र लक्षद्वीप में नियोजित कामगारों के संदर्भ में की जाएगी जिसके संबंध में केन्द्र सरकार समुचित सरकार है ।

[एफ. सं . ए. - 11016/3/ 2003- सी एल एस- II ]

वाई . पी . सहगल , अवर सचिव का.आ. 1129.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 33 ग की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार यह प्रावधान करने के लिए दिनांक 29-8-2000 की अधिसूचना संख्या जैड-13011/ 1/97 सी एल एस 11 में और संशोधन करती है कि भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की दिनांक 3-2-1987 की अधिसूचना संख्या ए-11016 / 5/85 सी एल टी द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 के अंतर्गत गठित श्रम न्यायालय , बंगलौर श्रम न्यायालय होगा जो उस राशि का निर्धारण करेगा जिस पर उस उप - धारा में उल्लिखित किसी लाभ की गणना कर्नाटक राज्य (केवल ) में किसी उद्योग में नियोजित कामगारों के संदर्भ में की जाएगी जिसके संबंध में केन्द्र सरकार समुचित सरकार है ।

New Delhi , the 20th April, 2004 [एफ. सं ए. - 11016/3/ 2003 - सी एल एस- II ]

वाई. पी . सहगल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi . the 20th April . 2004

S.O. 1130.-In exercise of the powers conferred, by Sub - section (2 ) of Section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby specifies the Labour Court . Ernakulam . Constituted under Section 7 of the said Act . by the notification of the Government of India in the Minsitry of Labour No. A- 11016/ 3/ 201) 3 -CLS - II dated 12-2-2004 as the Labour Court which shall determine the amount at which any benefit referred to in that Sub- section would be computed in terms of money in relation to workmen employed in any industry in the State of Kerala and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep in respect of which the Central Government is the appropriate Government .

S.O. 1129.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 33C of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby further amends the notification No. Z - 13011 / 1 /97- CLS- II dated 29-8-2000 to provide that the Labour Court . Bangalore constituted under Section 7 of the said Act , by the notification of the Govt . of India in the Minsitry of Labour No. A - 11016/ 5/ 85 - CLT dated 3-2-1987 shall be the Labour Court which shall determine the amount at which any benefit referred to in that sub - section would be computed in terms of money in relation to workmen

[F. No. A- 11016 /3 / 2003 -CLS - II] Y. P. SEHGAL , Under Secy .

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press . Ring Road. Mayapuri . New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications . Delbi - 110054.