This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत सत्यमेव जयत राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं० 44]

नईदिल्ली, अक्तूबर 24 अक्तूबर 30 , 2004 , शनिवार /कार्तिक 2-कार्तिक 8 , 1926 No. 441 NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 24 OCTOBER 30 , 2004 , SATURDAY/KARTIKA 2- KARTIKA 8 , 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप- खण्ड ( ii ) PART II- Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

गृह मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

का०आ० 2705.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में, गृह मंत्रालय के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों में हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान रखने वाले कर्मचारियों की संख्या 80 % से अधिक हो जाने के फलस्वरूप उन्हें एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :

स्वापकनियंत्रणब्यूरो

स्वापक नियंत्रण ब्यूरो ( मुख्यालय ) , नई दिल्ली ।

सीमा सुरक्षा बल

1. 193 बटालियन, सीमा सुरक्षा बल

2. 195 बटालियन, सीमा सुरक्षा बल

3. 112 बटालियन, सीमा सुरक्षा बल

4. 30 बटालियन, सीमा सुरक्षा बल

5. 1022 तोपखाना रेजिमेंट

6. जल स्कन्ध ( भुज)

3139 G1/ 2004

( 091)

केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल

1. कार्यालय कमांडेंट -143 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल

2. कार्यालय कमांडेंट -151 बटालियन, केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ।

[ सं० 12017/1 /2004- हिन्दी ] राजेन्द्र सिंह , निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS New Dethi , the 19th October. 2004

S.O. 2705.- In pursuance of sub rule ( 4 ) of Rule 10 ofthe Official Languages ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules . 1976 , the Central Governmem hereby notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Home Affairs where the percentage of Hindi knowing stall has gone above 80%:

Narcotics Control Bureau

Narcotics Control Burcau ( HQ. ) New Delhi 7092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Border Security Force

1. 193 Bn.. Border Security Force

2. 195 Bn .. Border Security Force

3. 112 Bn .. Border Security Force

4.30 Bn .. Border Security Force

5. 1022 Arty Regiment , Border Security Force 6. Water Wing (Bhuj )

Central Reserve Palice Force

Office of the Commandant - 143 Battalion , CRPF Office of the Cominandant - 151 Battalion , CRPF

[No. 12017/ 1 /2004-Hindi ]

RAJENDRA SINGH, Director ( OL. )

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्वविभाग )

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर , 2004

(आयकर)

का०आ० 2706.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली, 1962 केनियम, 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

( i ) अधिसूचित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रख - रखाव करेगा;

( ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों , जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) १ वां तथा 10वां तल, सेक्टर 3 , वैशाली गाजियाबाद ( ख ) संगठन के ऊपर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

क्रम सं ० अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम अवधि जिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है 1. रिसर्च फाउंडेशन फार जेनोलॉजी, 1-4-2003 से

21-3-2006 18. रामानुजा अय्यर स्ट्रीट, चेन्नई-1

टिप्पणियां: ( i ) उपर्युक्त शर्त ( i ) " संघ " के रूप में श्रेणीबद्ध संगठन पर लागू नहीं होगी ।

( ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम ले केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें ।

[ अधिसूचना सं० 264/ 2004/फा ० सं० 203/ 40/2004- आ० क०-11 ] निधि सिंह , अवर सचिव ( आयकर नि० II )

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

New Delhi , the 20th October, 2004

(INCOME TAX)

کے S.O. 2706. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below, for the purpose of clause ( iii ) of Sub- section( 1) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 ofthe IncomeTax Rules , 1962 under the category Institution" subject to the following conditions :-

(1) The organization shall maintain separate books ofaccount for its Research activities;

(ii) The notified organization shall submit , on behalf of the Central Government , to ( a) the Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) , Aayakar Bhawan, 9th & 10th Floor , Sector 3 . Vaishali , Ghaziabad ( b) the commissioner of Incometax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation , on orbefore the 31st October each year , a copy of its Audited Annual Accounts and also a copy ofaudited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under Sub-section ( 1) ofSection 35 of Income tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income tax to the designated assessing officer.

Sl . No. Name of the approved Organisation

Period for which notification iseffective

1. Research Foundation for 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 jainology

18, Ramanuja Iyer Street ,

Chennai- 1,

NOTES: ( i ) Condition ( i ) above will not apply to the organization categorized as Association" . (ii)The notified Organisation is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income tax/Director of Income tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction .

[Notification No. 264 /2004/ F, No. 203 /40 /2004 - ITA - 11 ] NIDHI SINGH , Under Secy . (ITA- 11)

नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर, 2004 (आयकर)

का.आ. 2707.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अद्योलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 7093 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है:-

( i ) अधिसूचित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा बहियों का रखरखाव करेगा;

(Exemptions) having jurisdiction over the organisation , on or before the 31st October each year , a copy of its Audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited Income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income-tax Act, 1961 in addition to the return of income- tax to the designated assessing officer.

S. No. Name of the approved Organisation

Period for which notification iseffective

1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006

1. Tata Memorial Centre , (TataMemorial Hospital & CancerResearch Institute ) Parel, Mumbai -400012.

( ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन केन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध मे आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा की भी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क ) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 9 वां तथा 10वां तल, सेक्टर 3 , वैशाली गाजियाबाद ( ख ) संगठन के ऊपर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगा।

क्रम सं. अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

Notes: ( i ) Condition ( i ) above will not apply to the organization categorized as " Association " .

टाटा मेमोरियल सेन्टर,

1. 1-4-2003से (टाटा मेमोरियल हॉस्पिटल एण्ड 31-3-2006 कैंसर रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट ) परेल, मुम्बई-400012

(ii) The notified Organisation is advised to apply intriplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval . to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income- tax/Director of Income - tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction.

टिप्पणी: ( i )

[Notification No. 265/2004 /F.No . 203 /31/2004- ITA-II] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy . (ITA - JI ) उपर्युक्त शर्त ( i ) " संघ " के रूप में श्रेणीबद्ध संगठन पर लागू नहीं होगी ।

( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर , 2004 ( ii ) अधिसूचित संगठन को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदन करें ।

{ अधिसूचना सं. 265 / 2004/फा. सं. 203/31/2004- आ. क. - 11 ] निधि सिंह, अवर सचिव ( आयकर नि. - 11 )

New Delhi , the 20th October , 2004 (INCOME TAX)

S.O. 2707. In is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved by the Central Government for the period mentioned below. for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income -tax Act . 1961. read with Rule 6 of the Income Tax rules . 1962 under the category Institution subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts for its research activities:

का.आ. 2708.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड ( १ ) के उप- खंड ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) ( क ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1980 की धारा १ को उप- धारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा श्री अवतार सिंह मान ( जन्म तिथि 14-10-1950 ), वरिष्ठ उपाध्यक्ष, आल इंडिया पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक आफिसर फेडरेशन , जो वर्तमान में चंड़ीगढ़, के आई एफ शाखा में वरिष्ठ प्रबंधक के रूप में तैनात हैं , को तत्काल प्रभाव से तीन वर्षों की अवधिके लिए और तत्पश्चात् उनके उत्तराधिकारी के नामित किए जाने तक या पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक में अधिकारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक या अगला आदेश होने तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड सिंह बैंक के बोर्ड में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है बशर्ते कि वे छह वर्ष से अधिक की अवधि तक लगातार पद धारण नहीं करेंगे ।

| फा०सं ० 9 /24/2001- बी ओ-1 ] रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव ( ii) The notified organization shall submit, on behalf of the Central Government . to ( a) the Director General of Income -Tax ( Exemption ). Aayakar Bhawan . 9th & 10th Floor . Sector 3 . Vaishali , Ghaziabad ( b ) the Commissioner of Income- tax/ Director of Income - tax 7094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | ( DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS)

( BANKING DIVISION)

New Delhi , the 14th October , 2004

केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिशों पर एतद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 ख की उप- धारा ( १ ) के उपबंध उस सीमा तक, जहां तक वे बैंक को चार महीने से अधिक की अवधि के लिए प्रबंध निदेशक और मुख्य कार्यपालक अधिकारी का कार्य करने के लिए किसी व्यक्ति की नियुक्ति करने के लिए बैंक पर प्रतिबंध लगाते हैं, बैंक ऑफ राजस्थान लि. पर 22 सितम्बर, 2004 से 21 दिसम्बर, 2004 तक अथवा बैंक के नियमित प्रबंध निदेशक और मुख्य कार्यपालक अधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक, जो भी पहले हो, लागू नहींहोंगे ।

[फा०सं ० 15 / 15/2004- बी ओए ]

डी०पी ० भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 19th October . 2004

S.O. 2708. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( 1) of Sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act . 1980 , read with sub - clause ( 1 ) and sub - clause ( 2 ) ( a ) of clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme. 1980 , the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby nominates Shri Avtar Singh Mann ( DOB 14-10-1950) . Sr. Vice President . All India Punjab & Sind Bank Officers Federation and presently posted as Sr. Manager. IF Branch . Chandigarh as officer Employee Director on the Board of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period ofthree years with immediate effect and thereafter until his successor has been nominated or until he ceases to be an officer of Punjab & Sind Bank or until further orders . whichever is earlier , provided that he shall not hold office Continuously for a period exccding six years .

[ F. No. 9/24/ 2001 -BO - I ] RAMESH CHAND . Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

S.O. 2710. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act . 1949 ( 10 of 1949) . the Central Government on the recommendations of the Reserve Bank of India hereby declare that the provisions ofSub -section ( 9 ) of Section 10B of the said Act shall not to the extent they preclude the bank from appointing a person to carry out the duties of the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer beyond a period excceding four months, apply to the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.. from 22nd September , 2004 to 21st December . 2004 or till the appointment of a regular Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer for that bank whichever is earlier .

[ F. No. 15/ 15/2004 -BOAJ

D. P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2709. बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिशों पर एतद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 ख की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) के उपबंध, 22 सितम्बर , 2004 से 21 दिसम्बर, 2004 तक, तीन माह की अवधि के लिए अथवा बैंक के लिए नियमित प्रबंध निदेशक और मुख्य कार्यपालक अधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक, जो भी पहले हो. लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[फा०सं० 15 /15/2004- बी ओए ] डी० पी० भारद्वाज , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th October. 2004

का.आ. 2711.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड ( १ ) के उप- खंड ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) ( क ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एत‌द्वारा श्री ए. एक्स. जार्ज ( जन्म तिथि 28-5-1951 ) , उप सचिव, आल इंडिया इंडियन बैंक आफिसर ऐसोसिएशन, जो वर्तमान में एर्णाकुलम में मुख्य प्रबंधक के रूप में तैनात हैं, को तत्काल प्रभाव से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए और तत्पश्चात् उनके उत्तराधिकारी के नामित किए जाने तक या इंडियन बैंक में अधिकारी के रूप में उनकी सेवाएं समाप्त होने तक या अगला आदेश होने तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, इंडियन बैंक के बोर्ड में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा० सं० एफ० 9 /26/2002 - बी ओ -1 ] S.O. 2709. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act. 1949 ( 10 of 1949 ) . the CentralGovernment on the recommendations of the Reserve Bank of India hereby declare that the provisions of Sub- sections ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of Section 10B of the said Act shall not apply to the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. , for a period of three months from 22nd September , 2004 to 21st December, 2004 or till the appointment of a regular Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer for that bank , whichever is earlier.

रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव [ F. No. 15/ 15/2004-BOA]

New Delhi , the 20th October , 2004

D. P. BHARDWAJ . Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2710. बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 1949 को 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए

S.O. 2711. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause ( 1) of Sub- section ( 3 ) of section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 , read with sub - clause ( 1 ) and sub-clause ( 2 ) ( a ) of 7095

30, 2004 / कार्तिक 8, 1926

भारत का राजम

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

चचिकित्सा वाईता है; विमियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यता प्राप्त

और , डा. शुवद उन्द्राख, मंगोलियाई नागरिक जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है, गवर्नमेंट एस.एम.एच.एस. हास्पिटल, श्रीनगर ( जम्मू व कश्मीर ) से धर्मार्थ ( बेरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं;

clause 9 of the Nationalised Banks (Management Miscelloneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970, the Contral Government, after consultation with the ReserveBank of India , hereby nominates Shri A. X. George (DOB 26-05- 1951 ) , Deputy General Secretary , All India Indian Bank Officers Association and presently posted as Chief Manager, Indian Bank, Ernakulam Branch as officer Employee Director on the Board of Indian Bank for a period of three years with immediate effect and thereafter until his successor has been nominated or until he ceases to be an officer of Indian Bank or until further orders , whichever is earliest.

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. शुवद उन्द्राख द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधिः-

[F. No. 9/26/2002 -BO- I] RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर, 2004

(क) इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से एक वर्ष की अवधि; अथवा

(ख ) उस अवधि, जिसके दौरान डा. शुवद उन्द्राख , गवर्नमेंट एस.एम.एच.एस. हास्पिटल, श्रीनगर ( जम्मू व कश्मीर ) से जुड़े हैं, इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी ।

[सं० वी -11016/1 / 2004- एम ई( नीति-1 ]

पी.जी, कलाधारण , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department ofHealth)

का.आ. 2712.- विशेष न्यायालय ( प्रतिभूति संव्यव्हार संबंधी अपराध विचारण ) अधिनियम , 1992 की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार, एतद्वारा , श्री वाई. सी. सत्यवादी, आईए एवं एएस ( 70 ) जो वर्तमान में अपर उप नियंत्रक एवं महालेखा परीक्षक, नई दिल्ली हैं, को विशेष न्यायालय ( प्रतिभूति संव्यवहार संबंधी अपराध विचारण ) अधिनियम, 1992 के अंतर्गत उनके पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 31-1-2006 तक अर्थात् उनकी अधिवार्षिता की आयु पूरी होने तक या अभिरक्षक के कार्यालय के समापन तक या अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो 26000/ - रुपए ( नियत ) के वेतनमान में प्रतिनियुक्ति के आधार पर अभिरक्षक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

New Delhi , the 13th October , 2004 [फा०सं० 22/4/2003 - सतर्कता]

अमिताभ वर्मा, संयुक्त सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st October, 2004

S.O. 2713.- Whereas medical qualification MD(General Medicine) granted by St. Petersburg State Medical Academy , Russia , is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act;

And whereas Dr. Suvd Undrakh , Mongolian National, who possess the said qualification is attached to Government S.M.H.S. Hospital , Srinagar ( J & K) for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain ;

S.O. 2712. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Special Court (trial of Offences relating to Transactions in Secuies ) Act , 1992, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Y. C. Satyawadi , IA & AS (70 ) , presently Additional Deputy Comptroller & Auditor General , New Delhi as Custodian under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Sccurities ) Act, 1992 on deputation basis in the pay scale of Rs .. 26000/ - ( fixed ) w.e.f. the date he joins the post and upto 31-01-2006 i.e. till the date of his superannuation or till the Office of the Custodian is wound up or until further orders whichever is earlier.

Now, therefore , in pursuancelance of clause (c) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Goveminent hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Suvd Undrakh in India shall be limited to:-

[F. No. 22/4/2003-Vig. ]

AMITABH VERMA, Jt . Secy

(a) a period of one year from the date of issue of this notification; or

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर, 2004

(b) the period during which Dr. Suvd Undrakh, attachedto Government S.M.H.S. Hospital , Srinagar ( J&K ) , whichever is shorter .

[No. V- 110-16/ 1 /2004-ME(Policy-I) ] P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy का.आ. 2713. भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु सेंट पीटर्सबर्गस्टेट मेडिकल अकादमी रूस द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम. डी. ( सामान्य कार्य 7096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] शुद्धिपत्र

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 14th October, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर, 2004

S.O. 2714. In this Ministry's notification No. V- 11015/ 7/2004 -ME (Policy - I ) dated 29th April, 2004 in coloumn 3 under the heading " Abbreviation for Registration " , against item No. (I ) relating to " Sher -I- Kashmir Institute of Medical Science, Srinagar " , in place of the existing entry under ' M.D. (Hosp . Admn. ) " the following shall be substituted: -

का.आ. 2714.-इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 29 अप्रैल, 2004 की अधिसूचना संख्या वी. 11015/7/ 2004 - एम ई ( नीति I) में " शेर- ए- कश्मीर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , श्री नगर " से सम्बन्धित मद सं. ( 1 ) के कालम ( 3 ) में ' एब्रीविएशन फार रजिस्ट्रेशन ' शीर्षक के अन्तर्गत ' एम.डी. (अस्पताल प्रशा. ) ' के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापित किया जाएगा:- " यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह शेर- ए- कश्मीर आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान, श्रीनगर में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में 1994 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गयी हो"

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification whengranted in or after 1994 in respect of students trained at" Sher - I - Kashmir Institute of Medical Science, Srinagar ) " [सं. वी. 11015/7/2004-एम ई ( नीति-1) ] पी.जी, कलाधारण , अंवर सचिव

[No. V- 11015/7/2004-ME(Policy - I) ] P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामलेविभाग )

( भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2715.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नि ५० के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के निवारण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गये हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

9271:1979

31-07-2004 1. 9271: 2004 निकास के लिए असुघटित पोलिविनाइल क्लोराइड एकल दीवार वाले नालीदार पाइपों- विशिष्ट ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31-07-2004 2. 15450: 2004 तप्त ओर अनतप्त जल की पूर्ति के लिए पॉलिएथिलीन एल्यूमिनियम/पॉलिएथिलीन समिष् दाब पाइपें -विशिष्टि

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवांतापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ सदंर्भ. सी ई डी/गजट ]

एस. दासगुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी 1 ) 7097 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक १, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2004

S.O. 2715.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rules (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated againt each:

SCHEDULE

Date of Established SI . No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and Year of Indian Standards , if any, Supe- rseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31-07-2004

9271: 1979

9271 : 2004 Unplasticized Polyvinyl Chloride ( UPVC ) Single Wall Corrugated Pipes for Drainage Specification (First Revision)

31-07-2004 2.

15450:2004 Polyethylene /Ahıminium/ Polyethylene Composite Pressure Pipes for Hot and Cold Water Supplies Specification

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shalt Zafar Marg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Gowahthi , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur . Nagpur. Patna . Pune . Thiruvananthapuram.

[ Ref..: CED/Gazette]

S. DAS GUPTA . Scientist F Dy. Director General (Tech - I )

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2716.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गये हैं: -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या

स्थापित 'भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम मंरख्या

औरवर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31-08-2004

4907 :1968

4907: 2004 टिम्बर संयोजक जोड़ों के परीक्षण की पति ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

31-08-2004 15455: 2004 विशाखित बेंत के ग्रेड- निधारण नियम

31-08-2004 15456: 2004 अविशाखित बेंत के ग्रेड- निर्धारण नियम

5248 : 1988, 6342: 1987

21-08-2004

13240:1991

15457: 2004 पतली कटी ( स्लाईम ) हुई विनियर के उत्पादन के लिए लट्टे

31-08-2004 15458 : 2004 भारतीय बेंत तथा उसके क्षेत्रीय वितरण का वर्गीकरण 7098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] (1) (2)

(3)

(4) 6.

956:1975

31-08-2004 956: 2004 हवाई पट्टी के बचाव हेतु दमकल की कार्यात्मक अपेक्षाएँ ( दूसर पुनरीक्षण )

31-08-2004 7. 7673: 2004 अग्नि शमन उपकरणों से सम्बद्ध परिभाषिक शब्दावली (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31-08-2004 15493: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ सामान्यअपेक्षाएँ

31-08-2004 15496: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियों का निरीक्षण और रख- रखाव- रीति संहिता

31-08-2004 10. 15501: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ- आईजी 541 शमन पद्धति

31-08-2004

រ 11. 15506: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ आईजी 55 शमन पद्धति

इन भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भः सी ई डी/ गजट ]

एस. दासगुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी 1 )

New Delhi , the 18th October , 2004

S.O. 2716.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Dateof Established No : and Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and Year of Indian Standards , if any, Super- seded by the New Indian Standard

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

4907:1968

31-08-2004 4907:2004 Method ofTesting Timber Connector Joints (FirstRevision)

31-08-2004 15455: 2004 Grading Rules for SplitCanes

31-08-2004 15456 : 2004 Grading Rules for UnsplitCanes

31-08-2004

5248: 1988,6342: 1987, 13240: 1991

15457: 2004 Logs for Production of Sliced Veneers-Specification

31-08-2004 15458: 2004 Classification of Indian Canes and their Zonal Distribution

956:1975

31-08-2004 956:2004 Functional Requirements for Rescue Tender for Air Fields (Second Revision )

31-08-2004 7673: 2004 Fire Fighting Equipment-- Glossary of Terms (First Revision)

31-08-2004 15493: 2004 Gaseous Fire Extinguishing Systems-General Requirements 7099 -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

(4) (1)

(2)

(3)

31-08-2004 15496:2004 Inspection and Maintenance of Gaseous Fire Extinguishing Systems-Code of Practice

31-08-2004 10.

15501 : 2004 Gaseous Fire Extinguishing Systems- IG 541 Extinguishing Systems

11.

31-08-2004 15506: 2004 Gaseous Fire Exitinguishing Systems - 1G 55 Extinguishing Systems

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and alsoBranchOffices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur. Nagpur, Patna, Pune , 'Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref.: CED/Gazette]

S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F '

Dy. Director General (Tech - J)

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2717.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिम भारतीय माताकें के विवरण मीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गये हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

मये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31-08-2004 1.

15491: 2004 सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए मध्यम घनत्व के कॉयर बोर्ड- विशिष्ट

31-08-2004 15284 (भाग-2 ): 2004 भूमि सुधार के डिजाइन और संरचना मार्गदर्शी सिद्धांत भाग 2 उर्ध्वाधर मालों का उपयोग करते हुए पहले ही संहत करना

30-09-2004 3.

15497: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ आईजी 01 शमन पद्धतियाँ

30-09-2004 4

15517: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ एचएफसी 227ईए शमन पद्धतियाँ

30-09-2004

12456:1988

12456: 2004 इलैक्ट्रॉनिक डाटा संसाधन संस्थापन की अग्नि से सुरक्षा- रीति संहिता ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

30-09-2004

12778: 1989

12778: 2004 इस्पात के तप्त वेल्लित समान्तर फ्लेंज सैक्शन से बने बीम स्तम्भ एवं बेयरिंग पाइल सैक्शन- आयाम ओर सैक्शन के गुणधर्म (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30-09-2004 7.

15528: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ कार्बन डाईआक्साइड सकल आप्लावन तथा स्थानीय अनुप्रयोग ( सब- फलोर एवं इन ( कैबिनेट ) , उच्च तथा निम्न दाब ( अवशीतन ) पद्धतियाँ

3139.Gł/04-2 7100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

30-09-2004 8. 15519 : 2004 वाटर मिस्ट अग्नि सुरक्षा पद्धतियाँ- पद्धति डिजाइन, संस्थापन और चालू करना- रीतिसंहिता

30-09-2004 9. 15525 : 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ- आईजी 100 शमन पद्धति

30-09-2004 10. 15505: 2004 गैसीय अग्नि शमन पद्धतियाँ- एचसीएफसी मिश्रण ए शमन पद्धति

30-09-2004 11. 2372: 2004 प्रशीतन टावरों के लिए इमारती लकड़ी-विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

4 इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भः सी ई डी/गजट)

एस. दास गुप्ता, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी-1 )

New Delhi , the 18th October , 2004

S.O. 2717 .-- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Date of Established No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3 )

(4) 1.

31-08-2004 15491: 2004 Medium Density Coir- boards for General Purposes- Speci- fication

31-08-2004 15284 ( Part 2) : 2004 Design and Construction for Ground Improve- ment- Guidelines : Part 2 Preconso- lidation Using Vertical Drains

30-09-2004 15497:2004 Gaseous Fire Extingui- shing Systems-IG (01 Extinguisting Systems

30-09-2004 15517 : 2004 Gascous Fire Extingui- shing Systems-HFC 227ca (Hepta Fluoro Propane) Extinguishing Systems

12456: 1988

30-09-2004 12456:2004 Fire Protection of Electro- nic Data Processing Installation - Code of Practice (First Revision)

12778: 1989

30-09-2004 12778 :2004 Hot Rolled Parallel Flange Steel Sections for Beams , Columns and Bearing Piles Dimensions and Section Properties (First Revision) 7101 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

30-09-2004 7. 15528 : 2004 Gaseous Fire Exting- guishing Systems-Carbon Dioxide Total Flooding and Local Applica- tion (Sub - Floor and In- Cabinet ) , High and Low Pressure (Refri- gerated) Systems

30-09-2004 8. 15519 : 2004 Water Mist Fire Pro- tection Systems-System Design , Installation and Commissioning- Code of Practice

30-09-2004 9. 15525: 2004 Gaseous Fire Exting- uishing Systems-1G 100 Exting- uishing Systems

30-09-2004 10. 15505 :2004 Gaseous Fire Exting- uishing Systems-HCFC Blend A Extinguishing Systems

30-09-2004 11. 2372: 2004 Timber for Cooling Towers- Specification ( Second Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata . Chandigarh . Chennai . Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati . Hyderabad. Jaipur. Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna . Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[ Ref.: CED/Gazette ) S. DAS GUPTA , Scientist ' F ' Dv. Director General ( Tech - I)

नई दिल्ली , 18 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2718.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक वर्ग की संख्या वर्ग और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ग

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

जुलाई, 2004 1 .

आई एस 15544 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 विश्वसनीयता स्ट्रेस स्क्रीनिंग भाग 1 : लॉट में निर्मित मरम्मत योग्य वस्तुएँ

जून 2004 2.

आई एस 12641: 2004 अर्द्धचालक युक्तियाँ-यांत्रिक एवं पर्यावरण कार्य- विधियाँ ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

जून 2004 3.

आई एस 15479: 2004 उच्च घनत्व अंतरसंयोजक स्तरों या बोडौँ की योग्यता और निष्पादन की विशिष्टि

जून2004 4.

आई एस 15480 ( भाग 1 ) : 2004 प्रकाशिक तंतु तनुकारी 7102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1925

[PART II SEC. 3 ( 1)] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

जून 2004 आई एस 15482: 2004 वाली संचार के लिए माइक्रोफोन एवं ईअरफोन

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ: एलदीडी/जी-75]

एस. दास गुप्ता वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' उप महानिदेशक ( तकनीकी -1 )

A New Delhi , the 18th October, 2004

S.O. 2718. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each : تاو

SCHEDULE

SI. No

Date of Established No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

July,2004 IS 15-444 (Part 1): 2004 Reliability Stress Screening Part 1 : Repairable Items manufac- tured in Lots

June, 2004 IS 12041 :2004 Semi- conductor Devices-Mechanical and Climatic Test Methods (First Revision)

June, 2004

IS 15479 : 2004 Qualification and Performance Specifica- tion for High Density Inter- connect ( HDI ) Layers or Boards

June, 2004

IS 15480 ( Part 1 ) : 2004 Fibre Optic Attemiators Part 1 Generic Specification

June , 2004

IS 15482: 2004 Microphones and earphones for speech communications

Copics of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Balador Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur , agpur. Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref.: LTD/G-75]

S. DAS GUPTA, Scientist ' F ' Dy. Director General (Tech - I) 7103 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

उमरपुर 16440408-83 זין

राय बरेली महाराज गंज

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

0-03-96

1678

0-00-69

1676

0-13-48

1674

का.आ. 2719. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में धूलेन्डी से फूलपुर पाइप लाइन परियोजना तक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइप लाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

निकट सर्वे नं.

0-00-42

1674 (फील्ड चैनल)

0-07-12

1685

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रत्तीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0-04-84

1664

0-11-36

1686

0-00-25

1663

0-01-33

1701

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

1687

1688

0-12-57

1700

1699

0-01-49

1702

0-18-66

1697

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको ठक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता की उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री बी.एम. मिश्र, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड , बी-35 व 36 , सैक्टर-1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

0-00-63

1700

0-00-95

1694

अनुसूजी

0-02-19

1708

गाँव

तहसील

जिला

सर्वे नं .

0-00-37

1704

0-00-36

1705

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए (हैक्टेयर में)

0-07-49

1707

0-01-84

1709

0-02-59

1554

उमरपुर

महाराज गंज

राय ली

0-13-48

1712

0-28-24

1598

0-09-50

1714

0-01-88

1555

0-25-28

1716

1596

0-02-46

1443

0-17-00

1597

0-06-67

1718

0-00-75

1613

0-01-81

1441

0-00-37

1607

0-28-30

1721

0-01-80

1606

0-02-59

1722

0-00-44

1605

0-05-22-

1723

0-02-14

1603

1724 0-01-90

0-24-60

1608

0-07-62

1721

0-03-97

1636

0-01-19

1726

0-01-35

1634

1725

0-24-08

1639

0-07-99

1728

0-02-32

1645

0-54-47

1729

0-04-01

1646

0-04-39

1414

0-12-84

1677 7104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

5 राय बरेली

1732

0-41-89 महाराज गंज उमरपुर

1883

0-14-80

1882

0-00-25

1878

0-00-31

1875

0-00-76

1874

1876

0-00-81

1877

0-09-49

1923

0-00-95

1925

0-22-78

1926

0-08-49

1746

0-03-80

1927

0-11-22

1980

0-15-59

1977

0-27-43

1978

0-02-64

2195 0-13-59

2196

0-00-22

1987

0-17-44

2194

2193

0-11-84

2192

0-14-62

2191

0-12-55

2190

0-00-56

2187

0-14-59

2188

0-13-78

2189

0-00-41

2185

2184 0-09-71

2183

0-07-36

2120

0-38-14

2170

0-05-75

2153

0-14-43

2152

0-01-95

2151

0-07-37

2126

0-14-67

2127

0-12-34

2149

0-02-87

2130

0-14-19

2132

0-09-10

2146

0-01-45

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 2

राय बरेली

2145

0-00-19 महाराज गंज उमरपुर

2302

0-02-48

2133

0-04-37

2143

0-02-67

2139

2144

0-17-04

2134

0-09-87

2139

0-00-43

2135

0-04-65

2136

0-01-16

2137

0-00-68

2312

8-45-76

कुल

राय बरेली सिद्धौना 2335

0-04-76

945

0-17-37

943

947

0-20-36

948

0-07-54

2324

0-29-27

2323

0-40-36

2328

(0-38-20

2352

0-00-22

2353

0-08-72

2351

0-08-74

2356

0-02-53

2357

0-11-21

2358

0-04-74

2359

0-07-12

2350

0-02-14

2349

2413

0-00-97

2362

0-11-84

2363

(0-15-22

2366

0-05-57

2409

0-00-84

2406

0-30-34

239 )

0-405-92

2393

0-14-66

2391

0-16-37

2392

0-16-28

2209

0-30-51 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

7105 1

5 राय बरेली

सिद्धौना

राय बरेली

2197 0-15-88

राय बरेली

0-07-26

राय बरेली धावूड नगर 799

0-34-93

800

2196

0-26-38 --(जारी)

803

0-06-75

0-01-95

802

0-08-58 सर्वे नं. 2196में (नाला)

815

0-10-90 सर्वे नं. 2196में 0-06-56

814 (कार्ट ट्रैक)

0-02-04

811

2197

0-05-08

0-33-92

2088

0-41-37

3-42-78

कुल

2087

0-26-36

0-25-44

बन्दीपुर 6

4-75-07

0-15-17

कुल

0-01-72

0-03-03

धावूड नगर 665

0-10-58

666

0-08-85

0-27-00

667

0-00-24

0-15-18

668

0-35-25

0-09-27

679

0-00-92

0-01-83

678

0-01-05

264

0-07-05

680

0-15-19

263

0-12-50

667

0-01-71

262

0-01-56

266

681

0-19-22

0-18-77

265

0-02-27

682

0-00-13

270

0-10-37

718

0-04-96

278

0-14-65

778

0-00-28

277

0-17-71

777

0-09-89

275

0-07-54

775

0-09-96

276

0-02-45

774

0-37-11

281

0-17-35

764

0-01-90

282

0-19-48

763

0-14-76

295

0-02-70

762

0-14-37

288

0-07-97

764

0-01-80

27.4

765

289

0-09-95

0-02-42

291

0-02-67

761

0-01-96

292

0-10-51

749

0-14-17

2-71-89

760

0-05-18

कुल

सालोन बरवा

557

753

0-08-91

0-02-16

558

752

0-04-75

559

0-33-57

751

0-05-60

560

0-01-95

750

0-42-19

सर्वे नं . 559 व 530 0-01-33 737

0-09-93

केबीच में

754

0-00-15

530

798

0-01-07

527

0-11-66 736

0-05-59

526

0-00-56 7106

[PART II Sec. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

10-03-82

सालोन बरवा 426

रायबरेली

0-15-84

बरवा 523

राय बरेली सालोन

428

0-02-14 528

(a)

0-04-62

422

0-03-59

522

423

0-15-91

(N)

0-07-40

497

425

0-00-49

0-08-62

498

424

0-06-88 509

0-04-44

3-79-93

0-01-70

510

कुल

508

बितौरा 53

0-02-15

0-06-08

0-05-31

506

0-01-52

0-01-26

0-02-80

498

0-06-91

502

0-13-92

0-05-42

500

0-00-96

0-07-35

501

0-04-15

0-10-89

499

0-14-29

0-01-29

487

0-02-75

0-00-23

488

0-03-86

478

0-10-63

0-03-04

0-03-64

476

0-07-39 477

0-00-13

0-02-75

473

0-18-17

187

0-00-98

475

0-00-51

186

0-08-26

474

0-10-66

188

0-27-58

470

0-04-39

185

0-00-11

613

200

0-06-23

0-10-36

614

0-01-92

201

0-01-64

467

202

0-06-51

0-01-02

617

0-00-84

212

0-16-81

618

0-20-49

214

0-07-38

620

0-00-17

213

0-22-95

621

0-21-73

215

0-08-34

221

0-02-39

0-21-30

220

सर्वे नं. 621 व 451 केबीचमें (पक्कीसड़क)

0-32-27

451

245

0-03-51

0-01-56

225

441

439

0-18-92

0-11-75

244

0-05-26

248

437

0-07-43

0-11-47

243

0-01-31 436

0-01-54

241

0-12-49 435

0-00-19

249

0-01-84

434

250

0-07-48 427

0-15-10 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

1 राय बरेली सालोन बितौरा 307

0-23-61

राय बरेली

304

0-01-16

305

0-09-69

304

0-09-30

413

0-00-51

414

0-01-60

415

0-04-77

0-05-97

303

416

0-13-84

423

0-24-49

1133

0-09-11

423

0-13-25

0-05-99

सर्वे नं. 423 में (राजवाहा

कैमाल)

423

0-02-62

1129

1115

1114 0-19-13

1113

0-01-31

0-15-57

1112

1109

0-01-28

0-00-52

1106

1108

0-17-42

1107

0407-45

1103

(0-100-92

(0-402-51

1092

1082

0-23-16

1083

0-08-86

1084 0-04-01

0-07-26

1085

0-04-15

1089

0-02-36

1088

1065

0-402-56

1057

0-22-52

1056

0-13-88

1054

0-13-50

1055

0-00-34

0-01-60

1053

1050

0-01-50

0-04-52

1049

3139 GI/04-3

7107

1051

0-02-12 सालोन बितौरा

1052

0-01-21

1047

0-00-17

1046

0-00-93

0-22-18

1045

1036

0-01-23

1035

0-00-98

1034

0-13-21

सर्वेनं. 1034 0-3-41

में (रोड़)

1023

0-10-52

1022

0-20-62

0-03-32

सर्वे नं. 1022 में (पक्कीरोड़)

999

0-06-54

0-14-97

1001

11000

0-12-57

947

948

0-09-78

951

0-03-57

946

0-01-76

945

0-19-41

0-01-47

920

1553

0-407-82

0-01-45

1703

1702

0-06-53

1704

0-18-78

1755

0-03-54

1754

0-28-80

1757

1758

0-45-97

1753

0-00-83

0-05-33

1761

1760

0-10-55

1821

0-02-69

1798

0-01-32

0-08-96

1799

1802

0-01-92

1803 06-10-0

0-11-67

1804

1800 7108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

1 सालोन

राय बरेली

बितौरा 1805

0-03-41

राय बरेली

1806

0-14-81

1818

0-15-93

1807

1817

0-03-76

0-27-70

1809

1810

0-00-39

1967

0-04-21

1968

0-51-12

1962

0-05-21

9-77-39

कुल

0-27-71

कमलपुर 19

बरेला 17

0-01-50

0-29-55

0-12-72

0-04-98

325

0-15-11

343

0-01-89

356

0-08-30

344

0-12-58

355

0-00-55

345

0-13-27

346

0-00-85

353

0-11-70

352

0-12-69

351

0-05-15

387

0-01-50

381

0-00-54

382

0-09-39

383

0-06-41

380

0-01-99

384

0-00-15

1-79-33

कुल

0-22-67

प्रधानपुर 80

0-10-37

0-24-15

0-17-61

0-11-19

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 2

5 सालोन

0-19-22 प्रधानपुर 98

69/499 0-01-28

0-08-62

105

0-14-14

104

0-01-56

106

0-26-31

110

0-09-35

109

0-05-54

406

0-20-67

405

0-02-63

409

0-01-19

420

0-05-07

377

0-05-26

421

0-02-08

376

0-09-78

375

0-06-20

374

0-09-10

371

0-00-83

373

0-01-06

462

0-00-15

463

0-07-52

372

0-04-17

368

0-00-21

364

0-01-83

367

10-08-33

366

10-02-79

365

0-01-97

428

0-01-47

369

0-00-44

427

0-06-76

सर्वे नं. 427 व

0-04-22

437के बीच (पक्कीरोड़)

438

0-12-98

437

0-01-16

441

0-06-82

439

0-00-21

440

0-01-36

442

0-06-44

446

0-04-45

448

0-05-76

445/502 0-01-35

447

0-09-71

3-27-98

कुल 7109 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0-06-56

247

सालोन

राय बरेली

रचानपुर

0-03-36

सालोन

राय बरेली

रचानपुर

0-02-52

246

0-01-84

0-14-09

सर्वे नं. 246 व 0-00-33 वी.बी. के बीच

0-27-32

3-18-94

0-00-27

कुल

0-03-13

0-02-35 23

275

निनवा

0-06-93

0-02-35

कुल

सर्वे नं. 302में

[फा. सं. एल -14014/ 16/2004 - जी.पी. ]

0-02-45

(रजवाहा कैनाल)

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

0-18-41

302

0-16-98

309

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

0-06-35

310

New Delhi , the 15th October, 2004

0-09-58

298

0-08-77

294

0-01-53

295

0-00-86

293

S.O. 2719. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthe transportation of gas from Thulendi to Phoolpur pipeline project in the State of Uttar Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL (India) Limited;

326

0-15-75

327

326

0-05-04

332

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

0-12-55

331

0-00-94

329

0-15-60

336

0-00-67

335

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

0-01-03

337

0-10-97

338

0-07-25

339

0-06-06

340

0-08-88

341

0-05-96

342

0-08-41

343

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri B.M. Mishra , Competent Authority , GAIL (India) Limited, B -35 & 36, Sector - 1 , Noida -201301 (Uttar Pradesh).

0-04-79

266

SCHEDULE

0-03-60

267

Area to be

Survey

Village

District Tehsil

0-20-74

268

No.

acquired

for ROU

0-02-24

269

(InHectare)

0-09-22

263

0-07-56

264

0-02-59

0-12-65

263

Maharaj Umarpur 1554

RaiBareilly

0-28-24

1598

0-03-25

258

Ganj

0-01-88

1555

0-04-06

259

1596

0-00-77

260

0-17-00

1597

0-09-49

257

0-00-75

1613

0-10-07

248 7110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

1 Rai

0-00-37

Bareilly Maharaj Umarpur 1607

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

0-07-62

Rai Bareilly Maharaj

Ganj

1606

0-01-80

1605

0-00-44

1603 0-02-14

1608

0-24-60

1636 0-03-97

1634

0-01-35

1639

0-24-08

1645

0-02-32

1646

0-04-01

1677

0-12-84

1644

0-08-83

1678

0-03-96

1676

0-00-69

1674

0-13-48

Near Svy, No.

1674

0-00-42

(FieldChannel)

1685

0-07-12

1664

0-04-84

1586

0-11-36

163

0-00-25

101

0-01-33

1637

1688

1700

0-12-57

169

112

0-01-49

167

0-18-66

1700

0-00-63

1694

0-00-95

1708

0-02-19

174

0-00-37

1705

0-00-36

1707

0-07-49

1709

0-01-84

1712

0-13-48

1714

0-09-50

1716

0-25-28

1443

0-02-46

1718

0-06-67

1441

0-01-81

1721

0-28-30

1722

0-02-59

1723

(0-05-22

1724

0-01-90

Umarpur 1721

1726

Ganj

0-01-19

1725

1728

0-07-99

1729

0-54-47

1414

0-04-39

1732

0-41-89

1883

0-14-80

1882

0-00-25

1878

0-00-31

1875

0-00-76

7 1874

1876

0-00-81

1877

0-09-49

1923

0-00-95

1925

0-22-78

1926

0-408-49

1746

003-80

1927

0-11-22

1980

0-15-59

1977

0-27-43

1978

0-02-64

2195

0-13-59

21%

0-00-22

1987

0-17

2194

(7)

2193

0-11-84

2192

00-14-62

2191

()-12-55

2190

0-00-56

2187

(0-14-59

2188

0-13-78

2189 0-00-41

2185

2184

0-09-71

2183

0-07-36

2120

(0-38-14

2170

0405-75

2153

(0-14-43

2152

0-01-95

2151

0-407-37

2126

(0-14-67

2127

0-12-34

2149

0-02-87

2130

0-14-19 7111 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0-03-03

665

RaiBareilly Rai Bareilly Dhawud

0-09-10

Rai Bareilly, Maharaj Umarpur 2132

Nagar

0-01-45

2146

Ganj

666

0-08-85

0-00-19

2145

0-00-24

667

2302

0-02-48

0-35-25

668

2133

0-04-37

0-00-92

679

0-02-67

2143

0-01-05

678

2139

0-15-19

680

0-17-04

2144

0-01-71

667

0-09-87

2134

0-19-22

681

0-00-43

2139

0-00-13

682

0-04-65

2135

718

0-04-96

0-01-16

2136

0-00-28

778

0-00-68

2137

0-09-89 2312

0-09-96

775

8-45-76

Total

774

0-37-11

0-04-76

764

0-01-90 2335

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Sidhauna

0-17-37

945

763

0-14-76 943

762

0-14-37

0-20-36

947

0-01-80

764

0-07-54

948

0-02-42

765

0-29-27

0-01-96 2324

761

0-40-36

2323

0-14-17

749

0-05-18

0-38-20

2328

760

0-00-22

0-02-16 2352

753

0-04-75

0-08-72

2353

752

0-05-60

0-08-74

2351

751

0-42-19

750

0-02-53

2356

0-09-93

737

0-11-21

2357

0-00-15

754

0-04-74

2358

0-01-07

798

0-07-12

2359

0-05-59

736

2350

0-02-14

0-07-26

799

2349

0-26-38

800

0-00-97

2413

0-06-75

803

0-11-84

2362

0-08-58

802

0-15-22

2363

0-10-90

815

0-05-57

2366

0-02-04

814

0-00-84

2409

0-05-08

811

0-30-34

2406

0-05-92

3-42-78 2390

Total

0-14-66

2393

0-25-44

Rai Bareilly RaiBareilly Bandipur 6

0-16-37

2391

0-15-17

0-16-28

2392

0-01-72

0-30-51

0-10-58

2209

0-15-88

0-27-00 2197

0-34-93

0-15-18 2196

0-09-27

0-01-95

In Svy No. 2196

0-01-83 (Nala)

0-07-05

264

In Svy No. 2196 0-06-56

0-12-50

263

(CartTrack)

0-33-92

2197

0-01-56

262

0-41-37

0-18-77 2088

266

0-26-36

2087

0-02-27

265

0-10-37

270

4-75-07

Total 7112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-14-65

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Bandipur 278

277

0-17-71

275

0-07-54

276

0-02-45

281

0-17-35

282

0-19-48

295

0-02-70

288

0-07-97

274

289

0-09-95

291

0-02-67

292

0-10-51

Total 2-71-89

Salon Barawa 557

0-08-91

558

559

0-33-57

560

0-01-95

In Bet Svy. No.

559& 530 0-01-33

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 2

0-07-38

Rai Bareilly Rai Salon Barawa 620

621

0-22-95 InBet Svy.No.

621&451 0-02-39 (Metalled Road)

0-32-27

451

441

0-01-56

439

0-18-92

437

0-07-43

436

0-11-47

435

0-01-54

434

0-01-84

427

0-15-10

426

0-03-82

428

0-02-14

422

0-04-62

423

0-15-91

425

0-00-49

0-06-88

424

Total 3-79-93

Rai Bareilly Salon

530

527

0-11-66

526

0-00-56

523

0-15-84

528

522

0-03-59

497

0-07-40

498

0-08-62

509

0-04-44

510

0-01-70

508

0-06-08

506

0-05-31

498

0-02-80

502

500

0-05-42

501

0-07-35

499

0-10-89

0-01-29

487

488

0-00-23

478

0-10-63

476

0-03-64

477

473

0-02-75

475

0-00-98

474

0-08-26

470

0-27-58

613

0-00-11

614

0-10-36

467

0-01-64

617

0-01-02

618

10-16-81

Bitaura 53

0-02-15

0-01-52

0-01-26

0-06-91

0-13-92

0-00-96

0-04-15

0-14-29

0-02-75

0-03-86

0-03-04

0-07-39

0-00-13

187

0-18-17

186

0-00-51

188

0-10-66

185

10-04-39

200

0-06-23

201

0-01-92

202

0-06-51

212

0-00-84

214

0-20-49

213

0-00-17

215

0-21-73

221

0-08-34

220

0-21-30

245

0-403-51

225

244

0-11-75

248

0-05-26

243

0-01-31

241

0-12-49

249

0-00-19

250

0-07-48 7113 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-14-97

1001

Bitaura

Salon

0-23-61

Rai Bareilly

307

Bitaura

Salon

Rai Bareilly

0-12-57

1000

0-01-16

304

947

0-09-69

305

0-09-78

948

0-09-30

304

0-03-57

951

0-00-51

413

0-01-76

946

0-01-60

414

0-19-41

945

0-04-77

415

0-01-47

920

0-05-97

303

0-07-82

1553

0-13-84

416

0-01-45

1703

0-24-49

423

0-06-53

1702

0-09-11

1133

0-18-78

1704

0-13-25

423

0-03-54

1755

0-05-99

0-28-80

1754

In Svy. No. 423 (Minor canal)

1757

0-02-62

423

0-45-97

1758

Bitaura

1129

RaiBareilly Salon

0-00-83

1753

1115

0-05-33

1761

0-19-13

1114

0-10-55

1760

0-01-31

1113

0-02-69

1821

0-15-57

1112

0-01-32

1798

0-01-28

1109

0-08-96

1799

0-00-52

1106

0-01-92

1802

0-17-42

1108

0-01-90

1803

0-07-45

1107

0-11-67

1804

0-10-92

1103

1800

0-02-51

1092

0-03-41

1805

0-23-16

1082

0-14-81

1806

0-08-86

1083

0-15-93

1818

0-04-01

1084

0-07-26

1807

1085

0-03-76

1817

0-04-15

1089

0-27-70

0-02-36

1809

1088

0-00-39

0-02-56

1810

1065

0-04-21

1967

0-22-52

1057

0-51-12

1968

0-13-88

1056

0-05-21

1962

0-13-50

1054

0-00-34

1055

9-77-39

Total

0-01-60

1053

0-27-71

Kamalpur 19

0-01-50

1050

0-01-50

Barela 17

0-04-52

1049

0-29-55

0-02-12

1051

0-12-72

0-01-21

1052

0-04-98

0-00-17

1047

0-00-93

1046

0-15-11

325

0-22-18

1045

0-01-89

343

0-01-23

1036

0-08-30

356

0-00-98

1035

0-12-58

344

0-13-21

1034

0-00-55

355

0-3-41

In Svy . No. 1034

0-13-27

345

(Road)

0-00-85

346

0-10-52

1023

0-11-70

353

0-20-62

1022

0-12-69

352

0-03-32

In Svy. No. 1022

0-05-15

351

(MetalledRoad)

0-01-50

387

0-06-54

999 7114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

5 RaiBareilly Solan

0-00-54

Kamalpur 381

Rai Bareilly

Solan

0-03-36

Rachanpur 10

Barela 382

0-09-39

0-01-84

0-06-41

383

(contd.)

0-14-09 380

0-01-99

0-27-32 384

0-00-15

0-00-27 Total 1-79-33

0-03-13

0-22-67

Pardanpur 80

0-06-93 81

0-10-37

In Svy. No. 302 (Minor Canal ) 0-02-45

0-24-15

302

0-18-41 76

0-17-61

309

0-16-98 75

0-11-19

310

0-06-35 98

0-19-22

298

0-09-58 69/499 0-01-28

294

0-08-77

0-08-62

295

105

0-01-53

0-14-14

293

104

0-01-56

0-00-86

326

106

0-26-31

110

327

0-09-35

0-15-75 109

0-05-54

326

406

0-20-67

332

0-05-04 405

0-02-63

331

0-12-55 409

0-01-19

329

0-00-94 420

0-05-07

336

0-15-60 377

0-05-26

335

0-00-67 421

0-02-08

337

0-01-03 376

0-09-78

338

0-10-97 375

0-06-20

339

0-07-25 374

0-09-10

340

371

0-00-83

341

0-06-06 373

0-01-06

0-08-88 462

342

0-00-15

0-05-96 463

343

0-07-52

0-08-41 372

266

0-04-17

0-04-79 368

0-00-21

267

0-03-60 364

0-01-83

268

0-20-74 367

0-08-33

269

0-02-24 366

0-02-79

263

0-09-22 365

0-01-97

264

0-07-56 428

0-01-47

263

0-12-65 369

0-00-44

258

0-03-25 427

0-06-76

259

0-04-06 InBet . Svy. No.

260

427&437

0-00-77

0-04-22

257

0-09-49 (MetalledRoad)

438

0-12-98

248

0-10-07 437

0-01-16

247

0-06-56 441

0-06-82

246

0-02-52 439

0-00-21

0-00-33 440

0-01-36

InBet . Svy. No. 246&V.B.

442

0-06-44

Total 3-18-94 446

0-04-45

448

0-05-76

Ninava 275

0-02-35 445/502 0-01-35

Total 0-02-35 447

0-09-71

[F. No. L- 14014/16/2004-G.P. ] Total 3-27-98

SWAMI SINGH, Director 7115 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर , 2004

0-00-54

सोरांव मानियमरपुर 493

इलाहाबाद

0-03-32

495

0-10-18

496

का.आ. 2720.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में थूलेन्डी से फूलपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0-01-58

492

0-01-19

490

0-00-18

491

0-03-15

464

0-10-50 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

784

785

0-31-42

783

0-02-07

782

787

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

0-05-39

788

0-00-14

789

0-02-37

779

0-05-34

775

0-07-43

776

0-01-39 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री बी.एम. मिश्र, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 व 36 , सैक्टर-1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

0-29-80

778

अनुसूची

0-00-23

763

सर्वेनं.

जिला तहसील गांव

0-00-78

762

0-00-24

978

0-19-64

979

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने केलिए (हैक्टेयर में )

0-05-94

980

0-11-57

891/1559

0-00-66

इलाहाबाद

मानियमरपुर 386

सोरांव

0-00-16

981

0-04-18

387

0-01-88

980/1462

0-15-37

388

0-03-57

741

0-06-22

389

0-00-52

1053

0-19-37

390

0-05-70

1054

0-07-30

391

0-10-02

0-01-70

1055

392

0-05-35

0-401-53

1056

393

0-01-83

0-04-82 394/1460

1058

0-11-91

394

0-00-55

1059

0-00-92

395

0-03-86

1060

0-02-96

407

0-02-10

1252

0-02-51

408

0-01-92

1257

0-00-27

424

0-00-35

1253

0-00-13

422

0-13-09

1254

0-03-93

409

0-10-37

1255

0-24-15

413

0-04-04

1256

0-34-35

414

1243

0-10-88

412

0-04-23

1245

0-04-03

494

3139 GI /04-4 7116

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-07-57

इलाहाबाद

1242

सोरांव मानियमरपुर

1244

0-01-71

1248

0-06-87

1246

1230

0-01-56

0-00-37

1208

1217

0-00-26

1225

0-16-67

1224

0-00-26

1226

0-01-31

1228

0-14-59

1229

0-01-33

1185

0-02-48

0-25-66

1188

1189

0-01-19

1184

0-32-56

1181

1180

0-03-96

1174

0-01-30

1179

0-03-95

1178

1177

0-02-43

1175

0-05-83

1176

0-01-83

1127

0-05-19

5-25-80

कुल

बिसानी उर्फ 4

0-00-15

शिकोहाबाद 9

0-06-07

0-05-60

0-13-57

0-00-78

0-03-93

0-06-05

0-00-61

0-12-05

0-02-44

0-14-91

0-01-17

0-01-12

0-00-35

0-00-12

0-04-65

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 2

0-01-07 सोरांव बिसामी ठर्फ 45

शिकोहाब 46

0-19-70

0-03-40

0-18-15

0-16-13

0-01-33

0-14-30

0-00-14

0-15-91

0-00-15

0-03-31

0-07-72

0-01-05

0-04-26

0-02-70

190

0-16-84

0-00-52

191

0-04-73

201

0-10-37

192

0-08-52

193

0-04-15

196

197

0-14-41

198

0-01-70

0-00-89

215

0-00-36

216

0-19-15

214

0-13-37

208

210

0-17-36

209

0-01-61

435बी.जी. 0-18-84

उत्तरी रेलवे

595

0-01-07

441

0-01-05

0-12-97

449

450

0-01-78

0-02-78

448

0-00-79

454

453

0-18-48

0-03-78

457

458

0-06-51

0-00-96

452

459

0-09-12

460

0-04-93

0-01-54

461(कार्ट

ट्रैक) [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7117 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 इलाहाबाद

472

सोरांव बिसानी उर्फ

0-11-47

610

0-03-11

सोरांव मदारीपुर

इलाहाबाद

0-00-61

571

शिकोहाबाद

614

0-14-09

0-01-63

570 ( कार्ट

615

0-01-12 ट्रैक)

662

0-21-90 569

0-23-47

661

0-00-51 567

0-02-63

662

0-04-03 568

0-26-01

532

0-00-77 566

0-09-15

692

0-02-76 565

0-10-31

710

0-27-00 564

0-09-38

717

0-01-59 563

0-00-98

712

0-02-96 495

0-08-67

711

0-02-92 496

0-08-17

709

0-09-81 498

0-00-81

707

0-19-49 497

0-30-94

706

0-10-80 502

0-11-56

704

0-08-32 547

0-02-19

705

0-01-96 508

703

0-01-15 532

0-00-17

701

0-10-09 544

0-01-64

700

0-12-41 545

0-00-14

699

0-25-07 543

0-02-94

697

0-10-57 542

0-14-35

696

541

0-08-63

005-76

719

0-03-06

539 (नाला)

755

0-00-26 540

0-01-96

756

0-02-73 538

0-13-31

871

0-02-11 536

0-02-58

875

0-05-13 537

0-00-55

873

0-13-06

5-86-11

कुल

874

0-00-21

मदारीपुर

876

0-12-46 6

0-00-33

877

0-14-11 562

0-01-39

879

0-11-68 565

880

0-00-32 564

0-37-74

883

0-08-84 560

0-00-11

884

0-05-44 559

0-06-64

885

0-11-03 596

0-03-28

886

0-09-96 602

0-00-14

887

0405-23 599

0-04-49

890

0-02-91 601

0-15-19

945

0-01-08 603

0-12-65

940

608

0-13-66

0-01-29

943

611

0-12-28

0-403-23 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 7118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-00-44

797

बन्का

सोरॉब

0-11-44

942

इलाहाबाद

मदारीपुर

सोरॉब

इलाहाबाद

0-00-38

796

जलालपुर

0-07-88

941

0-46-70

790

4-45-46

कुल

0-08-59

791

0-11-46

490

बन्का

0-00-81

792

0-09-90

487

जलालपुर

0-02-60

787

0-05-96

506

0-01-52

789

0-04-11

509

0-00-13

781

510

0-30-43

788

0-13-43

482

0-00-61

1040

0-00-74

481

0-01-44

1041

0-00-34

512

0-05-09

1034

0-03-52

513

0-00-12

1056

0-04-44

480

0-19-60

0-07-80 515

1057

0-00-95

513

0-01-48

1055

0-12-63

517

0-02-41

1059/1761 518

0-13-74

1059

0-06-88

0-04-85

519

0-19-02

1060

520

0-18-70

0-01-28

1147

0-09-81

609

0-408-50

1146

0-04-02

608

0-01-81

1065

607

0-01-53

0-03-74

1137

0-01-01

600

0-403-19

1139

0-02-82

601

0-02-50

1140

0-03-39

593

0-01-64

1136

0-01-37

603

0-03-17

1135

0-08-71

605

003-46

1134

593

0-01-39

0-02-25 592

1133

0-403-56

606

0-403-37

1132

761

0-09-87

1131

0-03-12

591

0-07-93

1130

0-00-63

764

0-08-09

1127

0-12-75

762

0-00-32

1126

0-00-48

590

0-400-10

1124

0-22-71

763

0-402-77

1123

0-07-80

767

0-03-49

1122

759

0-00-64

0-12-68 752

0-00-11

1121

0-07-40

758

0-04-88

1117

0-09-32

75.

0-04-98

1116

0-09-39

756

(0-401-57

1120

0-11-24

755

10-09-29

1118

767/1786

1108

0-02-36

782

0-00-11

0-03-28

1107

0-00-68

783

0-00-51

0-01-70 796

1119 7119

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

सकरामऊ 101

सोरॉब

0-14-17

इलाहाबाद

1106

सोरॉब बन्का

इलाहाबाद

0-18-73

832

0-12-41

1105

जलालपुर

0-04-37

980/1314

0-00-95

1202

0-21-63

980

0-25-53

1200

0-01-23

981

0-01-80

1199

982

0-04-95

1201

983

0-22-83

0-00-82

1198

957

0-00-68

0-32-79

1204

999

0-00-86

1216

0-31-42

953

0-08-79

1217

955

0-10-07

0-01-70

1210

954

0-00-34 1222

0-21-34

946

0-01-50 1233

0-14-78

1018

1223

0-05-37

0-12-29

945

1224

0-00-95

944

0-04-94 1225

0-15-68

0-04-91

943

0-09-48

1226

0-05-86

1020

1227

0-00-84

0-00-34

1022

0-05-40

1230

0-10-26

1021

0-01-33

1228

0-00-19

942

0-02-36

1229

0-00-21

933

0-00-42

1753

0-03-04

934

0-00-18

1754

940

0-10-66

6-64-76

कुल

941

0-02-49 53

0-00-97

सकरामऊ

0-04-26

939

0-00-52

0-05-05

938

0-46-07

0-00-41

937

0-00-28

3-24-18

0-01-81

कुल

0-06-20 68

नजारपुर 107

0-01-25

111

0-01-33

112

0-25-70 66

0-02-69

सर्वे नं. 112 व 0-05-66 65

0-03-67

211 के बीच में

0-04-39

0-07-45

211

0-11-41

208

0-16-54

0-12-26

207

0-01-08 62

0-05-26

209

0-06-04

206

0-00-17 90

0-12-02

205

0-26-42

0-00-54

0-08-26

223

0-02-20

0-00-65

224

0-05-14

225

0-18-49

0-10-55

226

0-02-84

0-00-96 7120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2

5 इलाहाबाद

227

सोरॉब नजारपुर

0-10-24

इलाहाबाद फूलपूर गहरपुर

सर्वे नं. 227 व 0-01-88

0-00-73 220 के बीच में

0-06-41 नाला

0-10-93 220

0-02-44

229

0-03-40

0-31-76 221

0-00-49

0-01-02

1-37-88

कुल

0-02-01 71

फुलपूर धुसरा

0-03-70

0-00-43 70

0-02-20

72बी

0-04-54 67

0-11-80

0-17-39

72ए

0-00-61

114

0-03-99 71

0-04-93

0-04-47 सर्वे 71 व 47 0-02-15

के बीच में

0-00-35 56

0-01-09

110

0-01-17 47

0-28-33

0-03-31 48

0-16-71

109

0-02-52 39

0-03-49

108

0-02-89 49

0-06-69

106

0-03-42 40

0-03-06

112

0-03-74 36

0-01-08

107

0-04-85 39

105

0-01-21

0-08-52 37

103

0-19-17

0-00-15 38

339

0-10-39

0-15-13 34

347

0-02-36

0-04-87 217

340

0-01-01

0-11-91

349

213

0-19-88

0-03-59

345

212

0-06-65

0-01-95

350

0-01-60 214

0-01-87

343

215

0-02-97

0-15-00

351

0-03-80 267

0-13-33

सर्वे नं. 351

268

0-02-20

0-12-00

(नाला)

269

0-00-59

353

0-09-64 267

0-13-85

272

कुल

1-77-36

0-07-11

110

271

0-01-76

0-08-78

रायदेपुर

109

275

0-05-97

0-34-21

278

108

0-04-04

0-08-31 279

107

0-08-39

0-02-55

121

281

0-08-08

0-01-84

120

283

123

0-00-55 280

0-10-86

122

0-07-41

2-67-94

कुल

149

0-02-91 7121 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

241

0-00-59

0-00-83

147

बसौधा

फुलपुर

इलाहाबाद

रायदेपुर

फुलपुर

इलाहाबाद

291

0-03-97

153

0-15-43

369

0-01-09

152

0-02-14

240

0-01-42

148

367

0-00-94

0-00-11

155

0-11-83

365

0-04-01

154

0-10-42

366

0-02-18

157

0-09-79

364

0-04-70

172

0-07-72

363

0-01-91

151

0-19-26

362

0-00-19

174

0-06-93

361

0-09-72

173

0-24-65

360

0-07-74

171

0-01-38

359

188

0-00-68

358

0-03-02

187/488

0-02-59

357

0-02-18

183

0-33-18

347/बी

0-02-21

187

0-02-67

313

0-00-68

186

0-13-43

346/ए

0-02-70

0-08-57

345/ए

सर्वे नं. 189 (पक्कीरोड)

0-07-35 189

345/बी

0-13-10 192

344

0-02-03

0-00-44 190

342/ए

0-10-73

0-03-53

342/बी

191

0-06-56

0-00-61

192

333

0-13-53

316

196

0-01-60

0-02-20

0-07-53 197/488

317

0-02-83

318

1-23-64

कुल

0-02-53

319

0-08-84

बसौधा 251/ए

0-07-74

320

0-00-46

253

0-11-08

324

0-01-85

252

0-11-29

325

0-03-70

249

0-15-52

327

0-02-71

249/543

0-10-64

328

0-03-39

249/542

0-06-84

329

0-00-72

255

0-06-28

330

0-00-36

254/बी

0-11-89

331

0-03-04

249/591

0-00-38

332

0-02-70

248

3-99-01

कुल

246

0-03-80

0-40-01

297

ओहरपुर 91

0-26-03

0-18-65

208

0-31-40

0-00-45

243/53

0-41-47

0-01-74

242

112

0-23-04

0-08-82

159

280 7122

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

5 इलाहाबाद

0-26-78

165

फूलपुर ओहरपुर ( जारी )

188

0-56-44

189

0-00-97

208

0-04-42

207

0-13-81

206

0-02-17

241

0-32-08

242

0-10-51

276

0-04-79

244

0-01-85

275

0-12-61

274

0-13-96

273

0-01-77

272

0-15-17

271

0-11-85

354

0-01-12

355

0-04-78

357

0-03-84

366

0-01-67

365

0-04-24

364

0-24-64

382

0-01-17

360

0-00-49

385

0-02-99

383

0-08-25

384

0-14-66

386

0-03-30

387

0-401-75

388

0-01-56

4-09-39

कुल

आहरैन

0-05-90

0-12-01

124

123

0-06-31

0-00-11

122

0-06-48

125

0-00-53

126

0-08-88

127

0-03-11

128

0-13-67

129

0-17-79

130

0-23-02

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] I

0-20-37

133

इलाहाबाद फूलपुर आहरैन जारी

136/784

0-01-12

सर्वे नं. 133 व

वी.बी. के

बीच में

1-20-40

कुल

बाराजी 412

0-05-79

425

0-13-38

424

0-14-85

430

0-18-80

429

0-12-28

482

0-01-20

490

0-01-02

489

0-00-72

485

0-17-56

486

0-02-60

484

0-14-50

499

0-01-83

501

0-19-34

502

0-04-09

477

0-03-64

562

0-09-48

564/704

0-00-62

563

0-02-28

564

0-23-01

565

0-00-18

563/706

001-34

566

0-403-18

573

0-407-41

568

0-01-10

569

0-14-01

571

570

0-19-99

578

(0-00-42

579

0-00-24

580

0-04-48

538

0-02-19

582

0-403-57

581

0-13-66

सर्वे नं. 581

(पक्कीरोड) 0403-78

2-42-64

कुल 7123 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 1

1- 2

(0-19-21

0-02-04

इलाहाबाद

दयालपुर (जारी ) (6)

फूलपुर भानेमऊ

फूलपुर

इलाहाबाद

0-06-30

(0-00-99

0-23-40

0-11-24

0-05-48

0-21-03 19 (रोड)

0-00-75

0-09-55 20

0-04-47

137

0-11-57 97

0-00-51

0-07-83

149

0-23-60

0-01-10

148

0-08-06

157

0-01-76

156

0-32-100 税)

224

0-01-15

0-01-52

155

0-00-27

0-10-79

229

0-00-86

0-00-66

0-12-52

232

0-04-65

0-12-77

230

0-06-87

231

0-05-82

0-00-84

228

0-01-82

0-05-57

0-08-02

287

144

0-03-16

0-17-10

240

0-01-69

148

0-22-34

281

0-01-54

165

283

0-02-29

0-14-79

159

0-01-22

283/315

0-00-63

162

0401-42

282

0-07-17

161

284

0-16-29 160 0-06-80

0-06-19

278

338

(0-00-800

279

(0-00-100 339

(0-00-10

340

0-08-51

2-86-52

कुल

0-01-57

152

0-17-54

फजलापुर

348

() -404-18

0-30-40

0-00-16

151

341

0401-75

0-06-85

342

0-00-61

0-19-18

346

0-19-94

0-02-29

399

(0-4000-74 4000

0-09-46

0-01-39

(0-07-49

409

398

0-09-71

0-08-78

402

0-12-06

2-18-62

कुल

(0-17-73

0-13-11

दयालपुर

सर्वे नं. 1

0-00-68

0-13-50

0-01-43

(नाला)

0-02-78

0-01-76

0-13-34

0-20-24

0-27-36

1-42-12 59

कुल

3139 GI/04-5 7124

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA :OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA8, 1926

(PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 1

2 3

5 11

0-13-30

0-03-81

317

फूलपुर नारी (भारी )

इलाहाबाद

इलाहाबाद फूलपुर मल्किया

324

0-02-97

0-11-33

323

0-00-29 14

0-22-60

322

0-01-10.

318

0-04-19 21

0-19-81

321

0-03-12

319

0-06-92

0-71-11

कुल

320

0-29-22 86

सराये लहरी

0-04-64

336

0-09-97 87

0-02-40

2-82-94

0-01-81

कुल

0-23-30

सराय अजीत 52

0-05-75 92

0-04-90

0-06-93 93

0-06-16

0-12-68

कुल

0-43-21

कुल

सराय हरी 13

0-03-12 नारी

251

0-06-79

किशन

0-15-51 250

0-24-65

0-02-61 246

0-00-27

0-15-81

248

0-02-64

0-03-92 249

0-17-57

0-04-36 238

0-04-06

0-00-17 267

0-03-38

0-09-70 269

0-00-18 268

0-09-38

0-04-08 234

0-00-91

0-10-67 236

0-00-84

0-01-56 235

0-25-74

156

0-04-09 281

171

0-07-13 229

0-03-44

169

0-02-58 284

0-11-09

166

0-10-56 285

167

0-01-57 227

0-07-65

165

0-10-56 287

0-07-96

0-06-74

184

288

0-09-08

183

0-08-44 289

0-00-83

185

0-10-12 293

0-27-69

189

0-04-55 289

0-00-26

188

0-17-30 291/ए

0-02-88

0-04-62

191

292

0-05-98

190

0-19-84 314

1-64-25

कुल

315

0-01-48

388

0-02-52

सिकन्दरा

316

0-33-37

389

0-07-95 सर्वे नं. 316 व

402

0-04-18 317 के बीच

में

0-00-54

401

0-06-19 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-00-32

इलाहाबाद

390

इलाहाबाद फूलपुर सिकन्दरा

(जारी) 400 0-09-46

0-01-78

391

0-02-26

399

0-08-06

398

0-03-37

397

0-00-18

393

0-05-86

395

0-07-64

396

0-07-93

408

407

0-03-91

410

0-00-16

411

0-06-08

0-11-47

412

0-00-98

413

0-11-57

418

0-01-23

416

0-17-39

420

0-10-48

417

0-37-24

421

0-05-70

434

0-04-83

414

1-78-74

कुल

0-00-58

344

सैफखानपुर

0-01-86

365

0-02-44

कुल

0-16-05

थारडीह

0-11-91

0-28-35

0-12-89

0-03-48

0-13-85

0-22-66

0-06-21

0-20-12

208

0-20-02

209

0-22-47

211

0-00-48

210

0-00-93

212

0-20-28

216

0-17-00

218

0-33-11

219

7125

0-12-23

221

फूलपुर

0-02-01

222

थारडीह (जारी)

474

0-13-31

475

0-70-25

0-01-40

484

0-02-60

490

0-04-67

488

0-08-41

487

0-18-18

486

0-01-16

489

0-00-14

525

003-88

485

सर्वे नं. 486 व

485( पक्की

रोड) 0-04-77

443

0-11-20

442

0-13-63

528

0-04-40

529

0-13-66

438

0-07-69

437

0-00-73

0-06-49

003-26

0-0-28

435

(-39-23

040-65

0-26-95

$49

0-02-24

550

0-01-22

$48

0-07-77

547

0-00-67

546/2104

0-06-74

346

551 0-01-11

$50

0.00-56

545

555

0-415-16

554

0.079

553

0-10-82

0407-79

552

587 0-00-82

0-04-10

586

588

( -12-58 7126

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA :OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II Sec. 3( i) ] 2

5 इलाहाबाद

589

फूलपुर

0-08-85

इलाहाबाद

फूलपुर पाली

0-03-06 610

थारडीह (जारी)

0-02-15

0-02-29 611

0-27-37

0-39-54 609

0-16-05

0-13-50

सर्वे नं. 609 व

0-28-28

0-10-07

603( पक्की

0-25-20

रोड)

0-00-84

603

0-27-69

0-02-68

604

0-00-84

0-29-78

0-27-93 607

0-09-77

606

0-05-36

0-03-81 605

0-18-59 657

0-18-06

0-00-44 659

0-08-84

0-00-34

सर्वे नं. 657 व

0-03-05

0-08-12

1-95-50

कुल

659के बीच में (रजवाहा कैनाल/पक्की

[फा. सं. एल-14014/16/2004-जी.पी. ] रोड)

स्वामी सिंह , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 15th October, 2004

662

0-00-28

661

0-09-27

673

685

0-31-36

S.O. 2720.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation ofgas from Thulendi to Phoolpur pipeline project in the State of Uttar Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL(India) Limited;

688

0-13-16

686

0-00-67

1857

0-14-31

1853

0-06-50

Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

1855

0-06-79

1854

1852

0-04-87

1851

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

0-04-98

1875

0-08-01

1874

1876

0-11-40

1880

0-05-27

1879

0-06-53

1882

Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date onwhich the copies of the notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri B.M. Mishra, Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, B - 35 & 36, Sector- 1 , NOIDA- 201301 ( Uttar Pradesh ) .

0-02-19

SCHEDULE

1881

0-10-69

District Tehsil Village

1885

0-15-92

Survey No.

1884

0-01-55

1892

0-25-33

Area to be acquired for ROU (in Hectares)

5 1895

0-408-51

Allahabad

Soraon

1896

Maniumar- 386

0-00-66

0-08-12

387

pur

कुल

9-34-67

388

0-04-18 0-15-37 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004 /कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-06-22

Allahabad Soraon Maniumar- 389

0-19-37

390

pur

0-07-30

391

0-01-70

392

0-01-53

393

0-01-83

394/1460

0-11-91

394

0-00-92

395

0-02-96

407

0-02-51

408

0-00-27

424

0-00-13

422

0-03-93

409

0-24-15

413

0-34-35

414

0-10-88

412

0-04-03

494

0-00-54

493

0-03-32

495

0-10-18

496

0-01-58

492

0-01-19

490

0-00-18

491

0-03-15

464

0-10-50

784

785

0-31-42

783

0-02-07

782

787

0-05-39

788

0-00-14

789

0-02-37

779

0-05-34

775

0-07-43

776

0-01-39

777

0-29-80

778

0-00-23

763

0-00-78

762

0-00-34

978

0-19-64

979

0-05-94

086

0-11-57

891/1559

0-00-16

981

0-01-88

980/1462

0-03-57

741

0-00-52

1053

0-05-70

1054

0-10-02

1055

0-05-35

1056

0-04-82

1058

7127

5 3

0-00-55

1059

Allahabad Soraon Maniumar-

0-03-86

1060

pur

0-02-10

1252

0-01-92

1257

0-00-35

1253

0-13-09

1254

0-10-37

1255

0-04-04

1256

1243

1245

0-04-23

0-07-57

1242

0-01-71

1244

1248

0-06-87

1246

0-01-56

1230

0-00-37

1208

0-00-26

1217

0-16-67

1225

0-00-26

1224

0-01-31

1226

0-14-59

1228

0-01-33

1229

0-02-48

1185

0-25-66

1188

1189

0-01-19

1184

0-32-56

1181

0-03-96

1180

0-01-30

1174

0-03-95

1179

1178

1177

0-02-43

0-05-83

1175

0-01-83

1176

0-05-19

11127

5-25-80

Total

Bisani urf 4

0-00-15 Shikohabad 9

0-06-07

0-05-60

0-13-57

0-00-78

0-403-93

0-06-05

0-00-61

0-12-05

0-02-44

0-14-91

0-01-17

0-01-12

37 7128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

1 Allahabad Soraon Bisani urf 51

0-00-35

Shikohabad 48

0-00-12

0-04-65

0-01-07

0-19-70

0-03-40

0-18-15

0-16-13

0-01-33

0-14-30

0-00-14

0-15-91

0-00-15

0-03-31

0-07-72

0-01-05

0-04-26

0-02-70

190

0-16-84

191

0-00-52

201

0-04-73

192

0-10-37

193

0-08-52

196

0-04-15

197

0-14-41

198

0-01-70

215

0-00-89

216

0-00-36

214

0-19-15

208

0-13-37

210

0-17-36

209

0-01-61

435B.G. 0-18-84

Northern

Railway

595

0-01-07

441

0-01-05

449

0-12-97

450

0-01-78

448

0-02-78

454

0-00-79

453

0-18-48

457

0-03-78

458

0-06-51

452

0-00-96

459

0-09-12

0-04-93

460

46.1(Cart 0-01-54

Track)

472

0-11-47

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2

Allahabad Soraon Bisani urf 571

0-00-61

0-01-63 Shikohabad 570 (Cart Track)

569

0-23-47

567

0-02-63

568

0-26-01

566

0-09-15

565

0-10-31

564

0-09-38

563

0-00-98

495

0-08-67

496

0-08-17

498

0-00-81

497

0-30-94

502

0-11-56

547

0-02-19

508

532

0-00-17

544

0-01-64

545

0-00-14

543

0-02-94

542

0-14-35

541

0-05-76

0-03-06

539 (Nala)

540

0-01-96

538

0-13-31

536

0-02-58

537

0-00-55

Total

5-86-11

0-00-21 Madaripur 5

0-00-33

562

0-01-39

565

564

0-37-74

560

0-00-11

559

0-06-64

596

0-03-28

602

0-00-14

599

0-04-49

601

0-15-19

603

0-12-65

608

0-01-29

611

0-12-28

610

0-03-11

614

0-14-09

615

0-01-12

662

0-21-90

661

0-00-51

662

0-04-03 7129 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

0-1960

515

Allahabad Soraon Banka

0-00-77

532

Allahabad Soraon Madaripur

0-00-95

513

Jalalpur

0-02-76

692

(-12-63

517

0-27-00

710

0-13-74

518

0-01-59

717

0-04-85

519

0-02-96

712

0-18-70

520

0-02-92

711

0-09-81

609

0-09-81

709

0-04-02

608

0-19-49

707

0-01-53

607

0-10-80

706

0-01-01

600

0-08-32

704

0-02-82

601

0-01-96

705

0-03-39

593

0-01-15

703

0-01-37

603

0-10-09

701

0-08-71

605

0-12-41

700

593

0-25-07

699

0-01-39

592

0-10-57

697

0-03-56

606

0-08-63

696

761

719

0-03-12

0-00-26

591

755

0-00-63

764

0-02-73

756

0-12-75

0-02-11

762

871

0-00-48

590

0-05-13

875

0-22-71

0-13-06

763

873

0-07-80

767

874

0-00-64

0-12-46

759

876

0-00-11

0-14-11

752

877

0-07-40

0-11-68

758

879

0-09-32

0-00-32

757

880

0-09-39

0-08-84

756

883

0-11-24

0-05-44

755

884

0-11-03

767/1786 885

0-02-36

0-09-96

782

886

0-00-68

0-05-23

783

887

0-00-51

0-02-91

796

890

0-01-08

0-00-44 945

797

0-00-38

0-13-66

796

940

0-46-70

0-03-23

943

790

0-11-44

0-08-59 942

791

0-07-88

0-00-81

792

941

0-02-60

787

4-45-46

Total

0-01-52

789

0-11-46

Banka 490

0-400-13

781

0-09-90

487

Jalalpur

0-30-43

788

0-05-96

506

1040

0-04-11

509

0400-61

0-01-44

1041

510

0-05-09

1034

0-13-43

482

0-00-12

1056

0-00-74

481

0-07-80

1057

0-00-34

512

0-01-48

1055

0-03-52

513

0-02-41

1059/1761

0-04-44

وز

480 7130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

2 3

5 1059

Allahabad Soraon Banka

0-06-88

Allahabad Soraon Sakramau 53

0-00-97 1160

0-19-02

Jalalpur

0-00-52 1047

0-01-28

0-46-07

0-08-50

1146

0-00-28 1065

0-01-81

0-01-81 1137

0-03-74

1139

0-03-19

0-01-33 1140

0-02-50

1136

0-02-69

0-01-64

1135

0-03-67

0-03-17

1134

0-03-46

0-04-39 1133

0-02-25

0-11-41 1132

0-03-37

0-12-26 1131

0-09-87

0-05-26 1130

0-07-93

1127

0-08-09

0-06-04

0-12-02 1126

0-00-32

0-00-54 1124

0-02-20 1123

0-02-77

0-05-14 1122

0-03-49

0-10-55 1121

0-12-68

0-02-84 1117

0-04-88

101

1116

0-04-98

( 0-00-400

832

0-18-73 1120

0-01-57

980/1314 0-04-37 1118

0-09-29

980

1108

0-21-63

981

1107

0-00-11

0-03-28

0-01-23 1119

982

0-01-70

1106

0-14-17

983

0-22-83 1105

0-12-41

957

1202

0-00-95

999

0-00-68 1200

0-25-53

953

0-31-42 1199

955

0-10-07 1201

0-01-80

0-04-95

954

0-00-34 1198

0-00-82

946

0-01-50 1204

0-32-79

1018

0-14-78 1216

945

0-12-29 1217

0-00-86

0-08-79

944

0-04-94 1210

0-01-70

943

0-04-91 1222

0-21-34

1020

0-05-86 1233

1022

0-00-34 1223

0-05-37

1021

1224

0-10-26

0-000-95

1225

942

0-15-68

1226

0-01-19

933

0-09-48

0-00-21 1227

934

0-00-84

0-03-04 1230

940

0-05-40 )

1228

0-01-33

0-10-06

941

0-02-49 1229

0-02-36

939

0-04-26 1753

0-00-42

938

0-05-05 1754

0-02-18

937

0-00-41 Total

6-64-76

Total

3-24-18 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7131

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

1 2

0-06-20

107

Allahabad Soraon Nazarpur

0-01-25

111

0-25-70

112

In Bet Svy. 0-05-66

No. 112 & 211

211

0-07-45

0-16-64

208

0-01-08

207

209

0-00-17

206

0-26-42

205

0-08-26

223

0-00-65

224

0-18-49

225

0-00-96

226

0-10-24

227

0-01-88

In Bet Svy.

No. 227 & 220 (NALA)

220

0-02-44

003-40

229

221

0-00-49

1-37-88

Total

0-03-70

Phool- Dhusra

0-02-20

pur

0-11-80

0-00-61

0-04-93

0-02-15

In Bet Svy .

No. 71 & 47

56 0-01-09

0-28-33

0-16-71

0-03-49

49 0-06-69

0-03-06

0-01-08

0-01-21

0-19-17

0-10-39

0-02-36

217 0-01-01

213

0-19-88

0-01-95

212

0-01-87

214

0-15-00

215

0-13-33

267

0-12-00

268

0-00-59

269

0-13-85

267

3139 G1/04-6

5 2

0-07-11

272

Allahabad Phool- Dhusra

0-08-78

271

pur

275

0-34-21

0-04-04

278

0-02-55

279

0-01-84

281

283

0-10-86

280

2-67-94

Total

Gaharpur 45

0-00-73

0-06-41

(0-10-93

0-31-76

0-01-02

0-02-01

0-00-43

72B

0-04-54

0-17-39

72A

0-403-99

114

0-04-47

0-00-35

0-01-17

110

0-03-31

0-02-52

109

0-02-89

108

0-03-42

106

0-03-74

112

0-04-85

107

0-408-52

105

0-00-15

103

0-15-13

339

0-404-87

347

340

0-11-91

0-03-59

349

0-06-65

345

350 0-01-60

0-02-97

343

0-03-80

351

0-02-20

In Svy. No.

351 (Nala)

(0-09-64

353

1-77-36

Total

001-76 Raidepur 110

10-05-97

109

0-08-31

108

0-08-39

107

121 0-08-08

120 7132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-400-55

Raidepur 123

Allahabad Phool-

122

(0-07-41

pur

149

0-02-91

147

0-00-83

153

0-03-97

152

0-01-09

148

0-01-42

155

0-00-11

154 0-04-01

157

0-02-18

172

0-04-700

151 0-01-91

174

0-00-19

173

0-409-72

171

0-07-74

188

187/488 0-03-02

183

0-02-18

187

0-402-21

186

0-00-68

0-402-70

In Svy No.

189

192

190

0-02-403

191

0-10-73

192 0-00-61

196

0-13-53

197/488

(0-03-20

Total

1-23-64

Basoudha 254/A 0-08-84

253 0-00-46

252

0-01-85

249

0-03-70

249/543 0-02-71

249/542 0003-39

255

0-400-72

254/B

000-36

249/591 0-03-04

248

0-02-70

246

(0-00-10

297

(0-10-01

208

0-18-65

243/53

000-45

242

0-401-74

280

008-82

241

0-00-59

291

(000-70

369

0-15-43

240

0-02-14

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 2

0-00-94

Allahabad Phool- Basoudha 367

365

0-11-83 pur

366

0-10-42

364

0-09-79

0-407-72

363

362

0-19-26

361

0-06-93

360

0-24-65

359

0-01-38

358

0-00-68

357

0-02-59

347/B

0-33-18

313

0-02-67

346/A

0-13-43

345/A

(0-08-57

345/B

0-07-35

344

0-13-10

342/A

0-00-44

342/B

0-03-53

0-06-56

333

316 0-01-60

0-07-53

317

0-02-83

318

319

0-02-53

320

0-407-74

324

0-11-08

0-11-29

325

0-15-52

327

0-10-64

328

0-06-84

329

330

0-06-28

331

0-11-89

332

0-00-38

Total

3-99-01

0-03-80

Oharpur

0-26-03

(0-31-40)

0-41-47

112

0-23-04

159

0-26-78

165

0-56-44

188

0-00-97

189

0-04-42

208

207

0-13-81

0-02-17

206

0-32-08

241

0-10-51

242

0-04-79

276

0-01-85

244

0-12-61

275

0-13-96

274 7133 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

0-04-09

502

0-01-77

Baraji

Allahabad Phool-

Oharpur 273

Allahabad Phool-

0-03-64

477

0-15-17

272

pur

0-15-85

562

0-09-48 271

0-01-12

564/704

0-00-62 354

0-04-78

0-02-28 355

563

0-03-84

564

0-23-01 357

0-01-67

366

565 0-00-18 365

0-04-24

0-401-34

563/706

364

0-24-64

566

0-03-18

0-01-17

573

0-07-41 382

360

0-00-49

0-01-10

568

0-02-99

385

0-14-01

569

0-08-25

383

571

0-14-66

384

0-19-99

570

0-03-30

386

0-000-42

578

0-01-75

387

0-000-24

579

0-01-56

388

0-04-48

580

0-02-19

538

4-09-39

Total

0-03-57

582

Aharain 20

0-13-66

581

0-05-90

0-03-78

In Svy . No.

0-12-01

124

581(Metalled Road)

0-06-31

123

2-42-64

Total

0-00-11

0-02-04

Bhansau 17

0-06-48

122

0-06-30

0-00-53

125

0-23-40

0-08-88

126

0-05-48

19(Road)

0-03-11

127

0-00-75

(0-13-67

128

0-04-47

0-17-79

129

0-00-51

0-23-02

130

0-23-60

0-20-37

133

0-01-12

136/784

0-08-06

0-00-76

0-00-20

In Bet Svy .

No. 133 &

V.B.

0-01-52

0-10-79

1-20-40

Total

0-00-86

0-05-79

412

Baraji

0-04-65

425

0-13-38

0-06-87

0-14-85

424

0-05-82

430

0-18-80

0-05-57

0-12-28

429

0-03-16

144

0-01-20

482

0-01-69

148

0-01-02

490

0-01-54

165

0-00-72

489

0-14-79

159

0-17-56

485

0-00-63

162

0-02-60

486

0-07-17

161

0-14-50

484

0-06-80

160

0-01-83

499

338

0-19-34

501 7134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

5 Allahabad Phool- Bhanemau 339

340

0-08-51 pur

152

0-01-57

348

0-04-18

151

0-00-16

341

10-06-85

342

0-00-61

346

0-19-18

399

0-02-29

400

0-09-46

409

0-07-49

398

402

0-08-78

Total

2-18-62

0-13-11

Dayalpur 1

In Svy . No. 1 (0-01-43

(Nala)

0-01-76

0-20-24

0-27-36

0-19-21

0-00-99

0-11-24

0-21-03

0-09-55

137

0-11-57

149

0-07-83

148

0-01-10

157

156

0-32-10

224

0-01-15

155

0-00-27

229

0-00-66

232

0-12-52

230

0-12-77

231

0-00-84

228

0-01-82

287

0-08-02

240

0-17-10

281

0-22-34

283

0-02-29

283/315

0-01-22

282

0-01-42

284

0-16-29

278

0-06-19

279

Total

2-86-52

0-17-54

Fazlapur 43

0-30-46

0-01-75

0-19-94

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 1

0-00-74 Allahabad Phool- Fazlapur

0-01-39 pur

0-09-71

0-12-06

0-17-73

0-00-68

0-13-68

0-02-78

0-13-34

Total

1-42-12

0-13-30 Malkiya 11

0-02-97

0-11-33

0-22-60

0-01-10

0-19-81

Total

0-71-11

Sarai Lahari 86

0-04-64

0-02-40

0-01-81

0-23-30

0-04-90

0-06-16

Total

0-43-21

251

Nari

0-06-79

250

0-24-65

246

()-15-81

248

0-02-64

249

(0-17-57

238

0-04-06

267

0-03-38

269

268

0-09-38

234

0-00-91

236

0-00-84

235

0-25-74

281

229

0-03-44

284

0-11-09

285

227

0-07-65

287

0-07-96

288

0-09-08

289

0-00-83

293

0-27-69

289

0-00-26

291 /A

0-02-88

292

0-05-98 7135 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

0-00-32

390

Sikandra

Allahabad Phool-

314

Nari

Phool-

Allahabad

0-09-46

400

pur

0-01-48

315

0-01-78 pur

391

0-33-47

316

0-02-26

399

0-00-54

In Bet Svy .

0-08-06

398

No. 316 &

0-03-37

397

317

0-00-18

393

0-03-81

317

0-05-86

395

324

0-07-64

396

0-00-29

323

0-07-93 322

408

0-03-91

407

0-04-19

318

0-00-16

410

0-03-12

321

0-06-08

411

0-06-92

319

0-11-47

412

0-29-22

320

0-00-98

413

0-09-97

336

0-11-57

418

2-82-94

0-01-23 Total

416

0-17-39

420

0-05-75

SarayAjit 52

0-10-48

417

0-06-93

0-37-24

421

0-12-68

Total

0-05-70

434

10-04-83

414

0-03-12

SarayHari 13

0-15-51

1-78-74 Kishan

Total

0-02-61

0-00-58

344

(0-(X)-27

Saif

10-03-92

365

Khanpur

0-01-86

0-04-36

0-02-44 24

Total

0-400-17

0-16-05

Thardih

0-09-70

0-11-91

0-00-18

0-28-35

0-04-08

0-12-89

0-10-67

0-03-48

0-01-56

0-04-09

156

000-10

0-13-85

0-07-13

171

0-22-66

(0-02-58

169

0-06-21

0-10-56

166

0-20-12

208

0-401-57

167

0-20-02

200

0-10-56

165

0-22-47

211

0-06-74

184

0-00-48

210

0-08-44

183

0-00-93

212

0-10-12

185

0-20-28

216

0-04-55

189

(0-17-00

218

0-17-30

188

(0-33-11

219

0-04-52

191

0-12-23

221

0-19-84

190

0-02-01

222

1-64-25

Total

(0-13-31

474

0-70-25

475

0-02-52

Sikandra 388

0-01-40

484

0-07-95

389

490

0-04-18

402

0-02-60

0-04-67

488

0-06-19

401 7136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

5 Allahabad Phool- Thardih 487

0-08-41

657

Allahabad Phool- Thardih

0-18-06 486

pur

0-18-18

659

pur

0-08-84 489

0-01-16

InBet Svy. 0-08-12 525

0-00-14

485

0-03-88

In Svy. No. 0-04-77

No.657& 659(Minor Canal/ Metalled Road)

662

0-00-28 486&485 (Metalled Road)

661

0-09-27 443

673

442

0-11-20

685

0-31-36 528

0-13-63

688

0-13-16 529

0-04-40

686

0-00-67 438

0-13-66

1857

0-14-31 437

0-07-69

1853

0-06-50 439

0-00-73

1855

0-06-79 436

0-06-49.

1854

434

0-03-26

1852

0-04-87 530

0-00-28

1851

0-04-98 532

1875

0-08-01 435

0-39-23

1874

431

0-00-65

1876

0-11-40 549

0-26-95

1880

0-05-27 550

1879

0-02-24

0-06-53 548

0-01-22

1882

0-02-19 547

1881

0-07-77

0-10-69

1885

0-00-67

546/2104

0-15-92

1884

546

0-01-55

0-06-74

1892

0-25-33 551

0-01-11

1895

0-08-51 550

1896

0-08-12 545

0-00-56

555

0-05-16

Total

9-34-67 554

0-07-09

Pali

0-03-06 553

0-10-82

0-02-29 552

0-07-79

0-39-54 587

0-00-82

0-13-50 586

0-04-10

0-28-28

588

0-12-58

0-25-20 589

0-00-84

0-08-85

0-27-69 610

0-02-15

0-00-84 611

0-27-37

0-27-93 609

0-16-05

0-10-07

In Svy .

0-03-81 No.609 &

0-18-59 603(Metalled

Road)

0-00-44 603

0-02-68

0-00-34 604

0-03-05

0-29-78

607

0-09-77

Total

1-95-50 606

0-05-36

[F. No. L - 14014/ 16/2004-G.P. ] 605

SWAMI SINGH , Director 7137 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

(1)

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

0-06-36

342

प्रतापगढ़ कुन्डा

0-06-87

344

सराय महासिंह

0-00-85

340

0-10-89

335

का.आ. 2721.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में धूलेन्डी से फूलपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0-15-15

334

0-04-78

366

0-00-85

333

0-49-53

368

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिएयह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0-08-86

427

0-20-91

425

0-00-78

सर्वे नं. 425 व448 के बीच में

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

440

0-06-20

448

0-04-21

449

0-05-93

450

0-03-19

455

0-06-46

456

0-05-65 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री बी.एम. मिश्र, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 व 36 , सैक्टर-1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

454

0-04-69

457

अनुसूची

0-10-21

458

तहसील गांव सर्वे नं.

जिला

0-00-54

453

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने केलिए ( हैक्टेयर में )

0-00-11

460

4΄

0-02-59

459

0-02-26

240

कुन्डा

प्रतापगढ़

0-00-22

473

सराय महासिंह

0-05-13

474

0-09-98

239

0-05-50

475

0-04-49

241

0-24-90

476

0-00-27

238

0-47-16

482

0-01-04

237

0-17-05

514

0-00-54

260

0-06-08

515

259

0-03-63

516

0-01-46

0-09-31

258

0-00-38

519

0-07-37

257

0-32-59

521

0-04-20

256

0-04-01

520

0-04-06

255

0-06-66

4-48-66 254

कुल

0-07-19

253

0-00-25

भावनापुर

0-12-29

252

0-41-65

0-00-72

251

0-00-26

0-03-85

250

0-10-11

0-21-60

323

0-00-81

0-00-94

324

0-35-53

0-19-14

327

0-00-78

0-04-24

325

0-30-07

0-02-98

329

0-00-68

0-01-71

343 7138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

प्रतापगढ़

0-00-96

कुन्डा भावनापुर

प्रतापगढ़

0-20-41

0-10-71

0-24-07

0-00-65

0-01-61

435

0-00-71

436

0-00-33

437

0-05-41

438

0-04-69

439

0-04-90

434

0-00-78

444

0-36-38

452

0-01-17

451

0-29-35

453

0-00-11

454

0-05-58

450

0-00-48

456

0-35-19

466

0-00-35

469

458

457

0-26-27

571

0-08-40

0-04-23

885

884

0-04-26

878

0-04-21

877

0-02-15

876

0-00-21

879

0-12-47

881

0-02-36

880

883

0-16-42

882

0-03-99

887

0-00-68

899

0-01-11

898

0-25-62

900

897

0-01-68

902

0-00-53

903

0-03-81

913

0-04-98

914

0-07-42

912

0-03-01

911

0-01-35

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 2

910

0-57-69 कुन्डा भावनापुर

1252

0-01-82

940

955

0-25-46

953

0-01-44

954

0-10-89

955

0-12-50

957

0-02-15

958

0-18-01

1024

0-07-98

1220

0-01-65

1221

0-23-66

1219

0-01-62

1210

1211

0-08-45

1219

1218

0-01-30

1217

0-02-26

1216

0-01-17

1215

0-00-33

0-02-54

1223

1225

0-01-74

1224

0-07-57

1618

0-10-62

1205

0-12-59

1204

1203

0-06-36

1619

1624

0-07-86

1622

1629

0-00-11

1180

1803

0-34-05

1800

0-04-98

1801

0-02-39

1798

0-01-85

1802

0-02-70

1791

1804

0-06-76

1810

0-10-28

1805

0-05-61

1807

0-04-34

1811

0-02-04

1812

0-11-39

1174

0-01-05 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0-00-29

1173

प्रतापगढ़ प्रतापगढ़ कुन्डा भावनापुर

0-15-84

1841

1840

0-04-36

0-00-14

1812

0-08-49

1839

0-12-21

1838

1837

1834

0-12-29

1833 0-06-17

1829

0-00-17

1830

0-05-24

0-03-01

1831

0-04-88

2164

0-02-95

2165

0-01-96

2163

0-00-45

2172

0-22-47

2171

2170

0-04-73

2181

0-24-23

2198

0-05-59

2186

0-16-60

2185

0-39-85

2184

0-01-50

2183

0-34-55

2182

0-00-55

2248

0-53-09

2262

10-43-16

कुल

0-18-40

कानूपुर

0-01-18

0-00-91

0-08-13

0-22-20

0-11-39

0-13-49

0-01-30

0-00-65

0-00-46

0-00-18

0-00-15

.68

0-18-36

0-16-49

0-01-64

3139 Gl /04-7

7139

0-00-37

कुन्डा कानूपुर

0-15-39

0-17-64

0-04-75

100

0-06-71

259

0-06-36

896

0-11-32

919

0-03-07

913

0-01-71

914

0-00-68

912

916

917 0-00-81

915

0-403-22

0-30-43

900

0-52-87

911

0-03-53

910

2-74-19

कुल

0-11-50

243

महियामउ

0-11-12

248

0-30-26

249

0-06-36

251

0-25-96

254

256

0-02-01

0-15-15

267

0-01-33

257

268 0-04-21

0-01-82

269

0-11-13

266

265

0-05-19

260

0-00-11

259

0-14-39

261

199 0-04-70

0-403-50

262

0-01-64

301

0-04-78

718

0-00-12

719

0-22-54

721

0-04-56

720

0-00-35

722

0-402-31

724

0-09-52

723

0-06-77

697

0-04-37

696 7140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC : 3 ( ii)] 3

5 महियामऊ 695

प्रतापगढ़ कुन्डा

0-04-26

प्रतापगढ़

0-08-78

कुन्डा महियामऊ 903

685

0-04-50

904

0-01-96 682

0-01-69

925

0-19-92 684

0-03-13

906

685

0-03-71

908

0-09-97 686

0-07-64

913

0-00-29 673

0-01-30

909

0-13-40 619

0-06-13

910

0-07-98 618

0-02-94

911

0-09-35 620

1211

0-02-88

10-04-62

621

0-00-16

1202

0-09-47 593

0-04-80

1210

594

0-01-74

1203

0-05-52 590

0-07-46

1204

0-405-66 592

0-01-98

1209

0-0050 591

0-00-36

1208

0-02-91 589

0-29-72

1205

0-04-62 586

0-05-44

1206

0-07-25 582

0-02-12

1207

0-11-01 585

0-402-74

1258

0-08-30 584

0-02-11

1266

0-04-33 574

0-00-13

1267

0-03-17 581

0-00-26

1275

583

(0-407-52

0-04-56

1276

0-05-41 575

0-407-55

1277

003-89 573

0-0046

1278

0-06-38 576

0403-55

1279

0-01-14 571

0-18-01

1272

0-02-73 523

0-09-42

1291

0-07-69 517

0-00-13

1292

0-02-65 518

(0-400-24

6-52-02

कुल

519

0-16-14

283

0-02-44

लालगंज रामगढ़

522

0-01-01

खास

520

0-17-23

284

0-18-68 1233

0-06-53

282

0-10-89 1232

0-22-83

292

1230

0-01-26

0-01-09

297

0-403-56 1231

298

0-03-59

0-01-09

895

0-14-38

299

0-08-25 894

0-02-02

300

0-01-26 896

0-00-14

306

0401-75 898

0-20-34

304

0-06-56 901

305

0-10-54 902

0-20-70

325

0-12-00 900

0-03-17

324

0-01-19 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

1 2

प्रतापगढ़

0-22-23

319

रामगढ़

लालगंज

प्रतापगढ़

310

खास

0-55-90

1-59-93

कुल

0-24-52

बैजालपुर

0-02-39

0-01-04

0-04-07

0-05-28

0-03-28

0-01-16

0-02-13

0-19-67

0-03-94

0-36-98

0-19-16

0-22-85

0-00-64

0-07-50

0-07-38

0-06-49

0-04-32

0-402-47

7()

0-16-32

1-92-49

कुल

2410

0-401-35

रहतिकार

2409

0-44-75

2418 0-04-60

0-15-01

2419

0-09-36

2385

0-25-407

2384

2337

(0-48-79

0-03-31

2336

0-25-69

2334

(0-12-58

2330

0405-55

2329

0-01-24

2328

0-03-31

2327

0-31-77

1930

0402-42

1931

0-15-23

1935

0-09-02

1934

7141

5 2

(सर्वे नं.

लालगंज रहतिकार

1935

व 1934)

रजवाहा

कैनाल

1970

0-29-71

1956

0-15-72

1957

0-02-14

1955

0-07-12

0-13-03

1958

0-12-69

1601

0-12-61

1602

1607

0-17-92

(0-25-65

1598

0-08-83

1591

0-00-59

1592

0-15-15

1595

1594

(0-11-82

0-00-85

1596

1545

0-01-78

1546

0-11-22

1547

0-27-84

0407-58

1549

0-01-73

1510

0-18-47

1512

0-00-22

1509

0-11-46

1506

0-09-87

1508

0-04-75

1507

0-01-97

1419

0-03-95

1415

1414

0-00-11

0-06-26

1413

1410

0-05-25

1411

0-14-78

1412

1402

0-04-59

1399

0-19-47

0-00-11

1398

0-02-20

1396

0-27-47

1395

0-00-34

1223

0-22-58

1224

(0-17-88

1225

0-01-25

1226

0-16-72

1202

1200

0-20-21 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

1 लालगंज रहतिकार

वापगढ़

0-20-23

प्रतापगढ़

1199

1197

0-01-17

1195

(0-23-46

0-09-01

1192

1191

0-05-21

1187

0-02-58

1157

0-13-14

1158

(0-24-93

1159

(0-30-45

1145

(0401-85

1144

0-401-44

1139

(0-407-37

1140

0-08-16

1141

0-402-47

1111

0-78-57

9-29-07

कुल

191

0-05-81

पुरेमाथादा

190

0-00-84

192

(0-405-80

169

0-08-85

193

0-06-02

186

0-02-98

194

0-03-04

209

0-00-71

208

0-06-26

210

0-403-54

0-15-70

219

0-00-51

232

0-03-60

233

0-00-94

234

0-19-47

235

(0-14-12

230

(0-000-100

237

(0-26-49

0-01-33

241

0-409-53

242 0-01-69

243

0-29-20

244

0-01-73

246

0-00-99

250

249

10-06-26

248

0-09-43

247

0-00-88

253

0-10-83

1-97-45

कुल

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] 2

0-23-18

1697

लालगंज मुस्ताफाबाद

1696

0-01-04

1695

0-62-97

1694

( 0-01-60

1691

0-36-00

1709

0-00-85

1750

0-02-79

1690

0-01-82

1689

0-000-94

1742

0-43-84

1741

(0-402-39

1739

0-10-51

1740

1743

0-407-19

1738

0-24-72

1735

(0-000-10

1737

0-13-55

1771

1780

0-03-27

1779

0-01-24

1776

0-07-87

1778

(0-24-49

1784

0-00-72

1776

0-02-98

1789

0-14-03

1788

1790

10-08-25

1791

0-11-05

1793

0-20-75

1794

0-03-61

1801

0-08-12

1795

0-19-13

1800

0-00-16

1796

0-407-98

सर्वे नं.

0-00-62

1795, 1796

व 1848

में (रोड)

1848

0-46-50

1849

0-15-21

1851

(0-10-51

1852

0-16-95

1853

0-08-31

1858 0-08-81

1859

( 0-407-46 7143 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(0-19-29

लालगंज इतैला

प्रतापगढ़

0-24-16

प्रतापगढ़

मुस्ताफाबाद 1863

लालगंज

0-03-91

0-07-64

1864

0-04-03

4()

0-12-82

1865

0-03-25

1877

0-03-30

0-00-55

1875

(0-01-89 1874

0-15-16

0-01-74

0-26-28

1891

0-06-65

0-44-30

1886

(0-08-45 1885

0-02-96

0-407-64

0-00-51

1883

(0-12-63

1933

(0-02-22

6-22-09

कुल

0-408-32

0-01-87

424

खजूरी

(0-01-22

101

0-20-55

412

0-00-23

124

418

()-14-94

(0-22-03

114

0-01-69

413

0-00-36

123

0-04-83

423

(0-401-86

115

0-01-21

417

0-18-37

113

0-08-03

421

0-07-43

112

(0-10-23

422

0-13-79

110

486

0-01-82

00-00-24

111

486/660

0-07-81

(0-(X)-95

108

0-08-14

490

1-48-35

कुल

0-19-07

485

0-02-38

128

भेभौरा

0-402-25

484

0-02-77

126

0-07-66

0-03-63

10-03-93

483

0-02-65

493

0-20-19

115

0-00-89

492

0-28-18

114

494

()-14-41

105

0-28-97

495

103

471

0-06-31

0-16-08

0-01-88

0-13-04

471

0-00-86

100

469

0-00-87

0-15-44

468

0-00-11

0-00-44

427

0-16-35

0-06-53

467

10-09-92

0-405-99

466

0-01-58

0-02-66

465

0-18-31

0-05-67

464

(0-11-30

134

0-07-87

463

(0-13-07

214

499

0-21-34

216

0-00-73

563

0-02-18

217

0-03-78

564

0-00-33

0-18-71 565

218

0-401-28

219

2-22-45

कुल 7144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8, 1926

भेभौरा

लालगंज

प्रतापगढ़

220

0-08-74

213

0-01-24

221

0-01-31

226

0-02-47

230

0-07-56

231

0-14-03

239

0-13-78

240

0-07-47

241

0-01-73

261

250

0-06-16

251

0-19-25

252

0-403-54

256/463

0-11-57

258

0-00-87

257

0-11-61

256

0-07-32

265

0-02-87

267

0-11-20

268

0-02-96

269

0-01-39

3-49-65

कुल

395

0-03-08

उछापुर

396

0-07-58

397

0-06-14

405

0-06-84

399

0-14-83

0-08-81

404

400

0-12-15

386

0-01-85

430

0-06-39

429

0-37-52

431

428

0-31-33

437

0-00-74

0-34-82

446

447

0-25-31

219

0-04-70

440

0-01-29

451

453

0-09-98

454

0-12-45

455

218

0-26-87

459

0-00-86

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1

प्रतापगढ़

469

0-21-94 लालगंज उछापुर

460

0-03-98

462

10-09-55

461

0-00-45

463

0-11-47

0-15-64

464

597

0-28-39

596

598

0-00-85

599

(0-25-50

581

577

0-27-500

601

0-00-99

576

0-01-89

572

0-00-94

567

0-06-43

571

564

0-02-19

505

0-19-95

552 0-01-06

551

0-401-37

550

(0-13-85

546

0-15-99

439

0-03-30

(0-15-51

सर्वे नं. 540 में (पक्की

रोड)

540

0-09-62

537

0-09-83

524

0-10-63

536

0-23-97

531

(0-03-29

529

0-01-54

532

0-16-02

528

0-01-05

526

0-09-88

5-74-51

कुल

कैथौला 111

117

118 0-04-63

120

0-01-15

121

(0-08-500

122

124

0-01-66

126 7145 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

0-00-67

584

लालगंज बेल्हा

0-05-19

प्रतापगढ़

127

कैथौला

लालगंज

प्रतापगढ़

0-02-29

585

(0-11-88

128

0-07-98

582

0-00-88

129

0-08-26

0-01-76

588

131

0-03-23

0-403-17 141

589

0-20-57

0-02-20 143

609

0-00-15

144

0-01-72

591

0-22-71

152

0-13-52

594

0-02-94

151

0-00-14

590

0-87-25

(0-18-54 कुल

593

0-06-62

0-11-54 147

595

पन्डारी

0-07-51

0-000-52

596

रजवाहा (सर्वे

0-00-85

597

नं. 47 व 149

604

के बीच में )

0-01-06

0-03-18

603

0-26-39

149

0-01-36

602

0-02-31

167

0-16-47

601

0-03-95

154

0-402-89

610

150

0-24-79

647

0-00-21

153

0-07-12

0-26-89

155

646

0-00-71

641

0-00-94

162

648

0-24-57

163

0-01-14

0-24-61

0-00-92

654

210

656

0-02-97

0-16-76

208

0-17-93

207

653

206

650

0-01-43

0-06-97

0-17-63

247

(0-11-02

651

0-401-44

202

0-00-55

676

0-00-78

201

0-13-75

660

0-11-14

200

0-00-19

673

0-16-86

258

0-12-68

661

0-00-47

271

0-12-23

662

0-01-38

270

0-05-30

663

269

764

0-01-19

0-00-72

204

765

0-27-66

259

0-44-35

770

0-07-17

262

0-02-79

771

0-05-66

261

0-00-15

सर्वे नं.

0-20-33

260

862/3413

0-03-05

261/277

व बीवी के

0-401-37

सर्वे नं.

बीच में

261/277

862/3413 0-00-33 में रोड

0-00-43

855

(एसएच-36)

0-403-34

864

2-58-92

कुल 7146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 2

5 प्रतापगढ़ लालगंज बेल्हा

866

0-28-06

726

लालगंज मेधावान

प्रतापगढ़

0-03-93 885

0-00-95

952

0-01-44 882

0-12-89

953

0-404-79 883

0-03-43

954

0-00-93 880

0-01-17

955

0-02-07 879

0-14-91

956

0-01-53 878

0-00-72

970

0-00-65 875

0-25-37

969

0-28-69 876

0-00-34

971

0-02-08 877

0-05-24

972

0-11-48 886

968

0-405-98

3-62-82

कुल

990

0-01-16 766

मेधावान

0-04-67

991

0-21-40 771

0-02-02

1319

0-01-77 772

0-02-61

1324

003-33 793

0-05-47

1322

0-23-65 792

0-16-35

1321

0-11-38 791

0-00-12

1320

0-09-50 790

0-17-33

1289

0-00-98 सर्वे नं.

0-14-75

1257

(0-12-31 790 व 789

1256

0-32-35 के बीच में

1254

789

0-03-41

1252

785

0-11-36

0-03-75

1249

804

00-34-69

0-13-99

1250

805

0-01-64

0-09-96

806

1243

0-17-12

0-405-82

809

1242

807

0-10-14

1238

808

0-13-07

सर्वे नं.

0-4000-67 811

0-14-00

1243 व 1169

के बीच में

815

(रोड)

812

1169

0-00-66

0-05-45 714

1170

715

0-03-57 731

1168

0-00-35

0-04-93 722

1167

0-12-17

0-403-47 721

1166

0-01-47

0-34-86

719

0-12-08

1171

0-14-37 717

1165

0-00-38

0-00-15 718

0-42-21

1170

0-00-73 708

0-01-55

1177

0-18-02 707

0-12-06

1178

0-21-19 706

0-04-30

1179

0-01-24 705

0-21-08

1180

0-402-82 [ भाग - खण्ड 3 (il) ]

7147 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004 / कार्तिक 8 , 1926

1 2

5 प्रतापगढ़ लालगंज मेधावान 1181

0-18-71

660

लालगंज आजहरा

0-16-87

प्रतापगढ़

1198

630 0-01-01 1199

(0-20-79

GIN

0-407-59

0-08-59

1200

641 0-401-64 1195

0-21-85

639

0-18-40 1197

0-01-26

638 001-16 1193

0-15-64

630

0-27-30

6-93-85

634

कुल

0-00-79 लालगंज रामगढ 220

0-20-52

6111

0-25-57 रैला

614

0-01-14 221

0-01-46

606

0-05-68

0-21-98

(117

0-403-72 कुल

0-01-55

607/113

आजहरा 204

0-01-18

605

0-09-19 254

0-17-67

255

0-00-38

604

0-09-53 252

0-02-43

603

0-00-89 251

0-00-56

750 0-06-61 256

0-05-08

912

0-02-91 257

911

()-15-52

0-00-55

249

0-01-15

910

0-00-37 247

0-18-86

909

0-14-04 267

0-00-28

915

0-20-03 268

0-01-44

919

0-38-71 269

0-01-52

918

0-01-28 270

895

0-400-45

0-01-06

271

0-01-13

0-16-27

881

272

880

0-02-86

273

0-00-84

005-97

876

0-405-401

316

875

0-00-67

0-01-96

0-407-83

274

874

0-08-85 275

0-04-03

0-01-72

894

205

0-04-63

870

0-01-86

308

0-15-19

0-01-50

882

276

0-11-29

868

0-000-31 206

0-06-02

0-25-43

890

0-09-01

207

869

288

0-1062

001-81

0-06-18

891

0-16-51

289

0-04-36

889

0-25-35

291

888

293

0-409-57

883

0-01-53 295

0-26-61

884

0-20-66

0-02-27

637

662

0401-23

5-43-49

कुल

3139 G1/04-8 7148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 / KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (i)] 1

5 355

सराय

0-07-53

प्रतापगढ़ सदर

1096

प्रतापगढ़ सदर सराय

0-01-87 देवराय

देवराय 1098

0-07-26 सर्वे नं.

0-01-47

1097

0-11-18 355 व 356

1099

0-01-28

0-12-97

1101

के बीच में (कार्ट ट्रक)

3-99-96

कुल

356

0-23-79

228

0-05-16 792

0-00-37

पूरे

वैशनाबा

790

0-29-65

231

0-17-07 789

0-08-30

230

0-04-13 787

0-00-73

232

0-03-63 362

0-24-84

264

786

0-04-03

235

363

0-35-38

234

0-18-47 364

0-33-21

271

0-10-93 754

0-02-02

268

0-03-89 749

0-01-32

272

0-08-31 756

0-00-63

269

755

0-00-28

270

753

(0-46-29

0-01-64

सर्वे नं.

0-403-59 752

0-10-28

270 व

1075

0-01-67

274के बीच 747

0-00-17

में (रोड़)

1077

0-407-66

274

0-16-25 1074

0-05-18

276

0-22-07 1078

0-00-45

275

0-00-39 1079

0-05-08

277

0-16-80 1080

293

0-04-18 1082

0-09-99

292

0-14-65 1084

0-03-79

285

0-01-93 730

0-04-87

1-55-49

कुल

731

0-00-38

[फा. सं. एल -14014/ 16/' 2004-जी.पी. ] 729

0-01-12

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 728

0-06-84

New Delhi , the 15th October , 2004 727

0-41-58

726

0-04-45

725

0-06-48

1093

S.O. 2721. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of gas from Thulendi to Phoolpur pipeline project in the State of Uttar Pradeslı , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;

0-01-64

1092

1094

0-04-21

724

0-10-28

708

0-00-13

1100

0-00-16

1095

0-10-05

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri B.M. Mishra , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, B -35 & 36 , Sector - 1 , Noida- 201301 (Uttar Pradesh).

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil Village Survey No.

Area to be acquired for ROU ( in hect. ) 1

240

0-02-26 Pratapgarh Kunda Saray

0-09-98

239

Maha-

241

0-04-49

singh

0-00-27

238

237

260

0-00-54

259 0-401-46

258

0-09-31

257

0-07-37

256

0-04-20

255

0-04-06

254

0-06-66

253

0-07-19

252

0-12-29

251

0-00-72

250

0-03-85

323

0-21-60

324

0-00-94

327

0-19-14

325

0-04-24

329

0-02-98

343

0-01-71

342

0-06-36

344

0-06-87

340

0-00-85

335

0-10-89

334

0-15-15

366

0-04-78

333

0-00-85

368

0-49-53

427

0-08-86

425

0-20-91

0-00-78

InBet

Svy. No.

425&448

440

7149

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

0-06-20

Saray 448

Pratapgarh Kunda

0-04-21

449

Mahasingh

450

0-05-93

455

10-03-19

456

0-06-46

454

0-05-65

457

0-04-69

458

0-10-21

453

0-00-54

0-00-11

460

459

0-402-59

473

0-00-22

474

0-05-13

475

0-05-50

476

0-24-90

482

0-47-16

514

0-17-05

515

0-06-08

516

0-03-63

519

0-00-38

521

0-32-59

520 0-04-01

4-48-66

Total

0-00-25 Bhavanapur

0-41-65

0-00-26

0-10-11

0-00-81

0-35-53

0-00-78

0-30-07

0-00-68

0-00-96

0-20-41

0-10-71

0-24-07

57 0-00-65

0-01-61

435

436

0-00-71

0-00-33

437

0-05-41

438

(0-04-69

439

0-04-90

434

0-00-78

444

0-36-38

452

0-401-17

451

0-29-35

453

0-00-11

454

0-05-58

450

0-00-48 7150

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-35-19

Pratapgarh Kunda Bhavanapur456

466

0-00-35

469

458

0-26-27

457

571

0-08-40

885

0-04-23

884

0-04-26

878

0-04-21

877

0-402-15

876

0-00-21

879

0-12-47

881

0-02-36

880

883

0-16-42

882

0-03-99

887 0-00-68

899

0-01-11

898

0-25-62

900

000100

897

0-01-68

402

0-00-53

903

0-03-81

913

0-04-98

914

0-407-42

912

( 0-03-401

911

0-01-35

910

0-57-69

12.52

0-401-82

940

985

0-25-40

953

001-44

954

0-10-89

955

0-12-500

957

0-402-15

958

0-18-01

10024

0-07-98

1220

0-01-65

1221

0-23-66

1219

0-401-62

1210

1211

0-08-45

1219

(0-100-100

1218

0-01-30

1217

0-402-26

1216

0-01-17

1215

0-40-33

1223

(0-402-54

1225

0-401-74

1224

(0-407-57

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

0-10-62

Pratapgarh Kunda Bhavanapur 1618

1205

0-12-59

1204

1203

1619

0-06-36

1624

0-07-86

1622

1629

1180

0-00-11

1803

0-34-05

1800

0-04-98

1801

0-02-39

1798

0-01-85

1802

0-02-70

1791

1804

0-06-76

1810

0-10-28

1805

0-05-61

1807

0-04-34

1811

0-02-04

1812

0-11-39

1174 0-01-05

1173

0-00-29

1841

0-15-84

1840

0-04-36

1812

1839

0-08-49

1838

(0-12-21

1837

1834

0-12-29

1833

0-06-17

1829 0-00-17

1830

0-405-24

1831 0-03-01 2164

2165

0-04-88

0-402-95

2163 0-01-96 2172

0-400-45 2171

0-22-47 2170

( 0-402-00 2181

0-04-73 2198

0-24-23 2186

0-405-59 2185

0-16-60 2184

0-39-85 2183

0-401-500 2182

0-34-55 2248

0-40-55 2262

0-53-409 Total

10-43-16 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

7131 1

2 : 3

0-18-40

Pratapgarh Kunda Kanupur 17

301

Pratapgarh Kunda Mahiamau

0-01-64 36

718

0-04-78 43

0-01-18

719

0-00-12 44

0-00-91

721

0-22-54 46

0-08-13

720

0-04-56 53

0-22-20

722

0-00-35 54

0-11-39

724

0-02-31 55

0-13-49

723

0-09-52 63

0-01-30

697

0-06-77 65

0-00-65

696

0-04-37 66

0-00-46

695

0-04-26 67

0-00-18

685

0-04-50 68

0-00-15

682

0-01-69

684

0-03-13 76

0-18-36

685

0-03-71 77

0-16-49

686

0-07-64 83

0-01-64

673

0-01-30 82

0-00-37

619

0-06-13 78

618

(0-02-94 97

0-15-39

620

0-04-62 99

0-17-64

621

100

0-04-75

593

(0-04-80

0-00-16 259

0-06-71

594

0-01-74 896

0-06-36

590

919

0-11-32

592

0-07-46

0-01-98 913

0-03-07

591

0-00-36 914

0-01-71

589

0-29-72 912

586

0-00-68

0-405-44 916

582

0-02-12 917

585

0-00-81

0-02-74 915

584

0-03-22

0-02-11

574

900

0-00-13

0-30-43

581

911

0-00-26

(0-52-87

910

583

0-07-52

0-03-53

575

0-407-55 Total

2-74-19

573

Mahiamau 243

0-11-50

576

0-00-46

0-03-55 248

0-11-12

571

0-18-01 249

0-31-26

523

0-09-42 251

0-06-36

517

0-00-13 254

0-25-96

518

0-00-24 256

0-02-01

519

0-16-14 267

0-15-15

522

257

0-01-33

520

0-01-01

0-17-23 268

0-04-21

1233

0-06-53 269

0-01-82

1232

0-22-83 266

0-11-13

1230

0-01-26 265

1231

260

0-05-19

895

0-01-09

0-14-38 259

0-00-11

894

0-02-02 261

0-14-39

896

0-00-14 199

0-04-70

898

0-20-34 282

0-03-64

901

0-00-44 7152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-20-70 Pratapgarh Kunda Mahiamau 902

900

0-03-17

903

0-08-78

0-01-96

904

925

0-19-92

906

0-09-97

908

0-00-29

913

0-13-40

909

0-07-98

910

0-09-35

911

0-02-88

1211

0-09-47

1202

0-00-10.

1210

0-05-52

1203

0-05-66

1204

1209

1208

0-02-91

1205

0-04-62

0-07-25

1206

1207

0-11-01

0-08-30

1258

1266

0-04-33

0-03-17

1267

0-04-56

1275

1276

0-05-41

(0-403-89

1277

1278

0-06-38

0-01-14

1279.

1272

0-02-73

1291

0-07-69

1292

0-02-65

Total

6-52-02

0-402-44

283

Lalganj Ramgarh

Khas

284

0-18-68

0-10-89

282

292

0-401-09

297

0-03-56

0-403-59

298

0-08-25

299

0-01-26

300

306

0-401-75

0-06-56

304

(0-10-54

305

325

0-12-00

324

0-01-19

319

(0-22-23

310

0-55-90

1-59-53

Total

0-24-52

Baijalpur 2

0-02-39

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)] 1

5 2

0-01-04

Pratapgarh Lalganj Baijalpur

0-04-07

0-05-28

0-03-28

0-01-16

0-02-13

0-19-67

0-03-94

0-36-98

0-19-16

0-22-85

0-00-64

0-07-50

0-407-38

0-06-49

0-04-32

0-02-47

0-16-32

1-92-49

Total:

2410

0-01-35 Rahatikar

0-44-75

2409

0-04-60

2418

2419

0-15-01

2385

0-09-36

2384

0-25407

2337

0-48-79

2336

0-03-31

2334

0-25-69

2330

(0-12-58

2329

0-05-55

0-401-24

2328

2327

(0-03-30

1930

0-31-77

1931

0-02-42

0-15-23

1935

0-09-02

1934

(In Svy.

No. 1935

and1934) .

Minor

Canal

1970

0-29-71

1956

0-15-72

1957

0-02-14

0-07-12

1955

1958

0-13-03

1601

0-12-69

1602

0-12-61

1607

0-17-92

1598

0-25-65

0-08-83

1591

0-00-59

1592 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ].

भारत काराजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ काातक 8 , 1926

7153 1

0-15-15

Pratapgarh Lalganj Rahatikar 1595

0-03-04

Pratapgarh Lalganj Puremathada 194 1594

0-11-82

209

0-00-71 1596

0-00-85

208

0-06-26 1545

0-01-78

210

0-03-54 1546

0-11-22

213

0-15-70 1547

0-27-84

214

0-00-51 1549

0-07-58

232

0-03-60 1510

0-01-73

233

0-00-94 1512

0-18-47

234

0-19-47 1509

0-00-22

235

0-14-12 1506

0-11-46

236

1508

0-09-87

237

0-26-49 1507

0-04-75

240

0-01-33 1419

0-01-97

241

0-09-53 1415

0-03-95

242

0-01-69 1414

0-00-11

243

0-29-20 1413

0-06-26

244

0-01-73 1410

0-05-25

246

0-00-99 1411

0-14-78

250

1412

249

-0-06-26 1402

0-04-59

248

0-09-43 1399

0-19-47

247

0-00-88 1398

0-00-11

253

0-10-83- 1396

0-02-20

Total

1-97-45 $1395

0-27-47

1223

1697

Mustafabad

0-00-34

0-23-18

1696

1224

0-01-04

0-22-58

1225

1695

0-17-88

0-62-97 1226

1694

0-01-25

1691

1202

0-01-60

0-36-00

0-16-72

1200

1709

0-20-21

0-00-85

1750

1199

0-20-23

0-02-79 1197

1690

0-01-17

0-01-82 1195

1689

0-23-46

0-00-94

1742

1192

0-43-84

0-09-01

1741

1191

0-02-39

0-05-21

1739

1187

0-10-51

0-02-58

1157

1740

0-13-14

1743

1158

0-24-93

0-07-19 1159

1738

0-30-45

0-24-72

1735

1145

0-01-85

1737

1144

0-01-44

0-13-55

1771

1139

0-07-37

1780

1140

10-03-27

0-08-16

1779

1141

0-01-24

0-02-47

1776

1111

0-07-87

0-78-57

1778

0-24-49 Total

9-29-07

1784

0-00-72 Puremathada 191

0-05-81

1776

0-02-98 $190

0-00-84

1789

0-14-92 192

0-05-80

1788

169

0-08-85

1790

0-08-25 193

0-06-02

1791

0-11-05 186

0-02-98

1793

0-20-75 THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7154

0-03-61

1794

Pratapgarh Lalganj Mustafabad

0-08-12

1801

0-19-93

1795

0-00-16

1800

0-07-98

1796

0-00-62

In Svy. No.

1795, 1796

and 1848

(Road)

0-46-56

1848

() -15-21

1849

0-10-51

1851

0-16-95

1852

0-08-31

1853

0-08-81

1858

1859 0-07-46

0-24-16

1863

0-07-64

1864

1865

0-12-82

0-03-25

1877

0-00-55

1875

0-15-16

1874

0-26-28

1891

0-44-30

1886

0-02-96

1885

0-00-51

1883

1933

6-22-09

Total

0-01-87

424

Khajuri

0-20-55

412

0-14-94

418

0-01-69

413

0-04-83

423

0-01-21

417

0-08-03

421

0-10-23

422

0-01-82

486

486/660 0-07-81

0-08-14

490

0-19-07

485

0-02-25

484

0-07-66

482

0-03-93

483

493

0-00-89

492

494

0-28-97

495

0-01-88

477

0-13-04

471

469

0-15-44

468

0-00-44

427

0-06-53

467

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

0-05-99

466

Pratapgarh Lalganj Khajuri

0-02-66

465

0-05-67

464

463

0-07-87

499

0-00-73

563

0-03-78

564

0-00-33

565

2-22-45

Total

0-19-29 Italia

0-03-91

0-04-63

0-03-30

0-401-89

0-01-74

51 0-06-65

0-08-45

0-407-64

0-12-63

0-402-22

0-08-32

0-01-22

101

0-00-23

124

0-22-63

114

0-00-36

123

115 0-401-86

0-18-37

113

0-07-43

112

0-13-79

110

0-00-24

111

0-00-95

108

1-48-35

Total

0-402-38 Bhebhoura 128

0-402-77

126

0-03-63

0-02-65

0-20-19

115

0-28-18

114

0-14-41

105

0-06-31

103

0-16-08

100 0-00-86

0-400-87

0-00-11

0-16-35

10-09-92

0-01-58

0-18-31

0-11-30

134

0-13-07

214

0-21-34

216 7155 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

2 3

0-15-64

0-02-18

Pratapgarh Lalganj Uchhapur 464

217

Pratapgarh Lalganj Bhebhoura

597

0-28-39 218

0-18-71

596

219

0-01-28

598

0-00-85 220

0-08-74

0-25-50

509

0-01-24

213

581

221

0-01-31

0-27-50

577

226

0-02-47

0-00-99

601

230

0-07-56

576

0-01-89 231

0-14-03

572

0-00-94 239

0-13-78

567

0-06-43 240

0-07-47

571

241

0-401-73

0-02-19

564

261

0-19-95

565

250

552

0-06-16

0-19-25

251

0-01-37

0-01-06

551

252

0-03-54

0-13-85

550

546

0-15-99 256/463 0-11-57

439

0-03-30 258

0-00-87

257

0-11-61

0-15-51

0-07-32

256

In Svy. No. 540 (Metalled Road) 265

0-02-87

0-09-62

540

267

0-11-20

537

0-09-83 268

524

0-10-63 269

0-02-96

0-01-39

536

0-23-97

531

0-03-29 Total

3-49-65

0-01-54

529

0-03-08

Uchhapur 395-

532

0-16-02

0-07-58

396

528

397

0-06-14

526

001-05 105

Toad

5-74-51

0-06-84

399

0-14-83

104

0-08-81

Kaithaula 111

400

117

0-12-15

118

0-04-63

001-85

386

120

0-01-15 130

0-06-39

121

0-37-52

129

( 048-50

122

0-4000-70 131

124

0-31-33

428

126

0-01-66 437

0-00-74

0-05-19

127

0-34-82

128

0-11-88

0-25-31

447

129

0-404-70

219

131

001-76

0-00-88

0-01-29

440

0-03-23

141

451

143

0-20-57

0-09-98

453

0-00-15

144

454

0-12-45

0-22-71

152

455

151

0-02-94

0-26-87

218

Total

0-87-25 459

147

0-06-62

Pandari

0-00-86

0-21-94

469

Pandri

007-51

0-403-98

460

Minor ( In 462

0-09-55

BctSvy.

000-45

461

No. 147& 463

0-11-47

149

3139GI/04-9 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

7156

0-26-39

149

Pratapgarh Lalganj Pandari

0-02-31

167

0-03-95

154

150

0-00-21

153

0-26-89

155

0-00-94

162

0-24-57

163

0-00-92

210

0-16-76

208

0-17-93

207

0-06-97

206

0-17-63

247

0-01-44

202

0-00-78

201

0-11-14

200

0-16-86

258

0-000-47

271

0-401-38

270

269 0-01-19

0-00-72

264

0-27-66

259

0-07-17

262

0-05-66

261

0-20-33

260

003-05

261/277

(0-401-37

In Svy. No.

261/277

Road (SH -36)

2-58-92

Total

584

Belha

0400-67

0-02-29

585

0-407-98

582

0-08-26

588

0-403-17

589

0-02-20

609

0-401-72

591

0-13-52

594

590 0-00-14

0-18-54

593

0-11-54

595

0-00-52

596

0-00-85

597

604 0-01-06

0-03-18

603

602 0-401-36

0-16-47

601

0-02-89

610

0-24-79

647

0-07-12

646

0-00-71

641

001-14

648

0-24-61

654

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

0-02-97

656

Pratapgarh Lalganj Belha

653

0-01-43

650

0-11-02

651

0-00-55

676

0-13-75

660

673 0-00-19

0-12-68

661

(0-12-23

662

0-05-30

663

764

765

0-44-35

770

0-02-79

771

0-00-15

In.Bet Svy..

No. 862/

3413& V.B.

0-00-33

862/3413

855

0-00-43

0-03-34

864

0-28-06

866

0-00-95

885

0-12-89

882

0-03-43

883

0-01-17

0-14-91

879

878 0-400-72

0-25-37

875

0-00-34

876

0-05-24

877

886

3-62-82

Total

766

Medhawan

004-67

0-402-02

771

0-02-61

772

0405-47

793

0-16-35

792

0-400-12

791

0-17-33

790

0-14-75

In Bet Svy.

No. 790 &

789

0-403-41

789

0-403-75

785

0-13-99

804

0-09-96

805

0405-82

806

809

(0-10-14

0-13-07

808

(0-14-000

811

815

812 0400-66 7157 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

0-21-19

Medhawan 1178

714

Pratapgarh Lalganj

Pratapgarh Lalganj Medhawan

1179

0-01-24 715

0-02-82

1180

0-00-35

731

1181

0-18-71

0-12-17

722

1198

0-34-86

721

0-00-66

0-20-79

1199

719

0-12-08

0-08-59

1200

717

0-00-38

0-21-85

1195

0-42-21

718

0-01-26

1197

708

0-401-55

0-15-64

1193

707

0-12-06

706

6-93-85

0-04-30

Total

0-21-08

705

0-20-52

220

Ramgarh

726

0-03-93

Raila

952

0-01-44

221

953

0-01-46

0-04-79

Total

0-21-98 954

0-00-93

204

Ajhara

(0-402-407

955

0-01-18

254

0-17-67 956

0-01-53

0-400-38

255

970

252

0-02-43

0-00-65

969

0-28-09

0-4000-56

251

971

0402408

0-05-08

256

972

0-11-48

0-00-55

257

968

0-01-15

249

0-05-98

990

0-01-16

0-18-86

247

0-21-40

991

267

0-00-28 1319

268

0401-44

0-01-77

1324

0-03-33

269

0-01-52 1322

0-23-65

270

0-11-38

1321

0-01-06

271

0-01-13 1320

0-09-50

0-02-86

272

1289

0-00-98

273

(0) 5-01 1257

0-12-31

316

0-32-35

1256

0-01-96

274

0-07-83 1254

0-404-83

275

0-11-36

1252

205 0-01-86

0-15-19

0-34-69

1249

308

276

0-11-29 1250 0-01-64

206

0-17-12

1243

0-06-02

207

1242

( 10901

288

0-10-62 12.38

0-16-51

289

In Bet. Svv . 0-400-67

0-25-35

291

No. 1243 &

0-09-57 1169 (Road)

293

0-05-45

0-26-61

295

1169

(0402-27

0-403-57

637

1170

0-401-23

662

0-404-93

1168

0-16-87

660

1167

003-47

630

1166

0-01-01

040147

0407-59

648

(0-14-37

1171

641

0-00-15

1165

639

(0-18-40

0-00-73

1170

638

0-01-16 1177

0-18-02 7158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKAS. 1926

5 2

636

0-27-30

Ajhara

0-00-79

634

0-25-57

611

614

0-01-14

0-05-68

606

0-03-72

607

607/113 0-01-55

605

0-09-19

0-09-53

604

603 0-00-89

756 0-06-61

0-02-91

912

911

0-15-52

0-00-37

910

0-14-04

909

0-20-03

915

0-38-71

919

0-01-28

918

895

0-00-45

0-16-27

881

880

0-00-84

876

0-05-97

0-00-67

875

0-08-85

874

0-01-72

894

870

0-04-63

882

0-01-50

0-00-31

868

890

0-25-43

0-01-81

869

0-06-18

891

0-04-36

$89

1688

0-01-53

883

0-20-66

884

5-43-49

Total

355

0-07-53 Sadar Sarar

Devay

In Bet . Svy . 0-01-47

No. 355&

356(Cart

Track)

0-23-79

0-00-37

0-29-65

789

0-08-30

0-00-73

787

0-24-84

362

786

0-04-03

0-35-38

363

0-33-21

364

754

0-02-402

749

0-01-32

0-00-63

756

755

0-00-28

0-46-29

753

[ PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii )]

5 3

1 2

0-10-28

752

Sadar Sarar

1075

Devray

0-01-67

0-40-17

747

1077 0-407-06

0-05-18

1074

0-400-45

1078

0-05-08

1079

0801

0-09-99

1082

10-03-79

1084

730

( 0404-87

731

0-00-38

0-01-12

729

728 0-06-84

0-41-58

727

0-404-45

726

725 0-06-48

1093

0-01-64

1092

1094 0-04-21

0-10-28

724

708

0-00-13

1100 0-00-16

0-10-05

1095

0-01-87

1096

0-07-26

1098

0-11-18

1097

0-01-28

1099

0-12-97

1101

3-99-96

Total

228

Pure

Baishnaba

0-17417

231

0-04-13

230

0-03-63

232

264

(0-402-400

235

0-18-47

234

0-10-93

271

0-03-89

268

0-08-31

272

269

0-01-64

270

0403-59

In Bet Svy.

No. 270 &

274(Road)

274

0-16-25

0-22-07

276

275

0-00-39

(0-16-80

277

10-04-18

293

0-14-65

292

0-01-93

285

1-55-49

Total

[F. No.- 14014/ 16/ 2004-G.P. ]

SWAMI SINGH , Director :

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7159 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर , 2004

इलाहाबाद

422

सौरॉव प्रलाबालपुर 0-00-86

417

0-05-72

418

0-04-92 का.आ. 2722.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में थूलेन्डी से फूलपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0-02-98

419

0-01-94

(रोड़) सर्वे नं.419, 418 व417में

1026

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइप लाइन बिछाने के प्रयोज़न के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

1025 0-17-42

1024

0-01-17

1023

0-19-41

1033

0-19-48

1035

0-01-63 अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

1034

0-00-15

1008

10-03-35

1036

0-08-15

1037

0-00-35

1007

0-02-75

1038

0-02-70

0-00-97

1006

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमिके नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्री बी.एम. मिश्र, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी 35 व 36 , सैक्टर -1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा ।

1005 0-14-12

0-08-71

1004

अनुसूची

1003

जिला तहसील गॉव

1055

0-05-71 सर्वे नं.

1056

0-00-65

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए हैक्ट एयर स्क.मी.

1063

000-44 2

1129

0-01-02

1130

0-04-71 इस दायाद सौरॉय प्रलाबालपुर 399

1128

0-00-66

400

0-04-60

1132 0-03-56 401

0-03-45

1127

0-07-82 406

0-06-79

1131 0-10-41 405

0-01-04

1121

0-05-29 404

1120 0-04-32

004-86

1127

407

0-07-63

1125

409

0-39-62

1138

0-01-18

477

1141

476

0-28-87

0-06-43

0-02-34

1142

410

0-02-58

1132

0-01-36 411

0-00-82

1137

0-26-88 470

0-03-09

1144

040168 468

0-00-77

1138

0-01-06 415

0-09-27

1145

1139

0-01-49 414

(0-15-52

1143

0-00-87 416

0-01-92

0-07-60 423

0-04-76

1140 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7160

इलाहाबाद

प्रलाबालपुर ( नाला ) सर्वे

सौरॉव

0-03-72

नं. 1151 व

1140में

0-00-42

1151

0-03-30

1149

0-26-36

1152

0-05-01

1154

1155

0-01-55

1153

3-89-11

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/16/2004- जी.पी]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक New Delli , the 15th October, 2004

S.O. 2722. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of gas from Thulendi to Phoolpur pipeline project in the State of Uttar Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid andwhich is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act . 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri B.M. Mishra . competent Authority . GAIL ( India) Limited . B - 35 & 36, Sector- 1 , Noida- 201 301 (Utlar Pradesh) .

SCHEDULE

District

Arca to be Village Survey

Tehsil

No. acquired for ROU in/Hect . /

Arc./Sq Metre

Soraon Pralabalpur 399

Allahabad

0-00-66

400

0-03-45

401

0-06-79

406

10-01-04

405

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

404

Allahabad Soraon Pralabalpur

0-07-63

407

0-39-62

409

477

0-01-18

0-28-87

476

0-02-58

410

0-00-82

411

0-03-09

470

0-00-77

468

0-09-27

415

0-15-52

414

0-01-92

416

0-04-76

423

422 0-00-86

0-05-72

417

0-04-92

418

419

0-02-98

(Road) in

0-01-94

Svy. No. 419

418& 417

1026

0-17-42

1025

0-01-17

1024

0-19-41

1023

0-19-48

1033

0-01-63

1035

0-00-15

1034

1008

0-403-35

0-08-15

1036

0-00-35

1037

0-02-75

1007

0-402-70

1038

1006 0-00-97

0-14-12

1005

0-08-71

1004

1003 10-00-10

1055

0-05-71

1056 000-65

1063

0-00-44

0-01-02

1129

0-04-71

1130

0-04-60

1128

0-403-56

1132

0-07-82

1127

0-10-41

1131

0-05-29

1121

0-04-32

1120 7161 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

अनुसूची

0-04-86

जिला तहसील गॉव

1127

Allahabad Soraon Pralabalpur

सर्वे नं.

1125

1138

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करनेके लिए हैक्ट एयर स्क.मी.

1141

0-06-43

0-02-34

1142

284

0-02-57

प्रतापगढ़

पारनीपुर

लालगंज

0-01-36

1132

0-02-89

573(रोड़)

0-26-88

1137

0-07-54

570

0-01-68

1144

0-21-22

569

1138

0-01-06

1145

560

0-01-60 1139

0-01-49

568

0-01-99 1143

0-00-87

567

'0-00-10

0-07-60

1140

508

0-13-11 (Nala) in

565

0-34-76

0-03-72

563

0-03-41 Svy. No. 1151 &1140

557

0-00-13

0-00-42

1151

564

0-01-71

0-03-30

1149

551

0-04-26

0-26-36

1152

1154

0-05-01

561

0-01-11 1155

554

0-16-26 1153

0-01-55

0-06-69

637

553

0-01-53 Total 3-89-11

638

673

0-08-63 [F. No. L -14014/16/ 2004 -G.P .] SWAMI SINGH, Director

672

0-11-51

0-05-86

668

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

0-11-79

669

676

0-01-29

0-00-61

674

670

0-00-31 का.आ. 2723.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में थूलेन्डी से फूलपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा, एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0-00-78

675

677

0-00-79

0-16-70

678

679

0-04-06

0-16-89

680

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0-00-29

743

745

0-09-12

736

0-00-59

777

0-00-82

737

0-15-43 अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

0-07-88

738

739

0-04-22

0-00-77

740

774

0-21-49

775

0-01-53

773

0-00-49

0-17-07

786

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्री बी.एम. मिश्र, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 व 36 , सैक्टर -1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा । [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 7162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

0-06-60

0-20-89

785

कालनपुर

प्रतापगढ़ लालगंज

प्रतापगढ़

पारनीपुर

लालगंज

0-01-21 797

0-14-85

806

0-19-40

0-10-36

807

0-403-13 805

0-407-04 808

0-15-86

0-401-42

0-402-53

809

0-00-26

0-00-22

3-53-59

कुल

0-13-50

0-05-33

रूहादा 1 (सई नदी)

0-07-51 4

0-07-29

0-00-15

0-17-38

0-00-78

6/362

0-19-68 58

0-06-46

0-00-22

0-04-04

0-01-18 60

0-43-10

0-20-13

0-03-88

0-00-13

0-00-52

0-15-01

0-06-37

65 (कार्ट ट्रक)

0-18-87

0-02-01

0-00-19

0-01-15

0-00-24

0-15-96

0-18-14

0-02-05

258

0-02-94

106

0-22-90

259

0-09-54

0-00-12

0-04-75

105

0-401-85

260

(0-21-500

261

0-01-06

0-02-34

103

262

0-29-72

263

0-38-39

0-01-45

10-01-44

264

0-05-78

274 0-01-86

0-01-27

275

(रोड) सर्वे

0-01-69

नं. 98

273

0-00-13

0-12-75

0-18-00

277

400

0-09-37

399

0-37-31

279

0-03-81

398

283

0-32-31

0412-25

0-44-49

289

401

0-06-35 299

405

0-08-40

0-06-13

288

0-01-76

4004

0-17-07

307

0-24-39

-406

0400-59

306

0-01-37

412

0-06-14

308

0-00-37

407

0-03-09

309

0-400-20

411

0-35-07

311

0-24-29

+13

0-00-93

310

416

0-02-17

4-32-27

कुल

417

0-00-12 7163 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 3

Ὶ

0-27-81

553

418

0-14-43 कालनपुर

प्रतापगढ़ लालगंज

प्रतापगढ़ लालगंज पुरनोता

554

0-11-65 419 0-00-73

558

0-01-27

0-07-16

421

555

420

0-06-32

0-05-68

562

0-15406 422

0-03-88

565

423

0-02-79

0-12-41

566

424

0-12-24

568

0-01-59

572

0-29-00

4-46-77

कुल

574

0-402-53 बाछाबल

207

002-71

2-94-81

कुल

0-12-48

208

0-10-38

209

[फा. सं. एल-14014/16/2004- जी.पी ]

0-15-85

210

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक

0-05-32

211

212

0-11-49

New Delhi , the 15th October, 2004

0-12-56

213

0-16-71

235

0-407-71

236

0-10-60

234

S.O. 2723. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of gas from Thulendi to Phoolpur pipeline project in the State of Uttar Pradesh , a pipcline should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited:

233 0-14-06

238

232

0-03-08

0-13-14

229

0-17-73

231

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

230

0-09-55

0-02-19

228

274

0-04-85

1-65-51

कुल

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers couferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act. 1962 (50 of 1960 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

0-01-13

309

पुरनोता

0-28-04

310

306 0-00-81

0-34-08

304

300

0-01-21

299

0-26-89

298

0-01-22

297

Any person interestedin the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act . as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri B.M. Mishra , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, B- 35 & 36 , Sector- 1 , Noida- 201301 (Uttar Pradesh),

0-02-70

291

SCHEDULE

0-10-29

292

District Tehsil Village

Area to be

Survey 293

0-09-73

No. acquired for

0-02-65

294

ROU

0-17-87

289

hect./Are./Sq Metre 287

0-13-74

0-17-17

284

0-04-12

564

0-402-57

Pratapgarh Lalganj Paranipur 284

532

0-02-41

0-02-89

573(Road)

0-00-35

283

0-07-54

570

10-03-52

782

569

0-21-22 533

0-07-51

560

552

0-14-95

0-01-60 3139 G1/04-10 7164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

568

0-01-99 Pratapgarh Lalganj Paranipur

567

508

0-13-11

565

0-34-76

563

0-03-41

557

0-00-13

564

0-01-71

0-04-26

551

561

0-01-11

554

0-16-26

0-06-69

637

553

0-01-53

638

673

0-08-63

672

0-11-51

668

0-05-86

669

0-11-79

676

0-01-29

674 0-00-61

670

0-000-31

0-00-78

675

677

0-00-79

678

0-16-70

679

0-04-06

680

0-16-89

743

10-00-29

745

0-09-12

736

0-00-59

0-00-82

777

737

0-15-43

738

0-07-88

739

0-04-22

740

0-00-77

774

0-21-49

775

0-10-53

773

0-00-49

786

0-17-07

785

0-20-89

797

806

0-14-85

0-10-36

807

805-

808

0-15-86

0-402-53

809

Total 3-53-59

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2

0-405-33

I ( Sai River)

Ruhada

0-07-29

0-17-38

6/362

0-00-78

58 0-06-46

0-04-04

0-43-10

0-03-88

0-00-52

65 (Cart Track) 0-06-37

0-18-87

0-01-15

0-15-96

258

0-02-05

259

0-22-90

0-00-12

260

001-85

261

0-21-50

262

263

0-38-39

264

001-44

274 0-01-86

275

0-01-27

0-00-13

273

0-18-00

277

0-37-31

279

283

10-32-31

289

0-44-49

299 0-08-40

288

0-06-13

0-17-07

307

0-00-59

306

308

0-06-14

0-03-09

309

0-35-07

311

310

0-00-93

Total 4-32-27

Kalanpur

0-06-60

0-01-21

68 0-19-40

0-403-13

67 0407-04

0-01-42

0-00-26

0-00-22

0-13-50

64 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

0-07-51

Kalanpur

0-00-15

0-19-68

0-400-22

0-01-18

0-20-13

0-00-13

0-15-01

0-02-01

0-00-19

0-00-24

0-18-14

106

0-02-94

0-09-54

105

0-04-75

103

0402-34

(0-29-72

0-01-45

0-405-78

(Road) in Svy . No. 98 ( 0-0-69

0-12-75

390

0-419-37

398

0-403-81

0-402-25

405

0-06-35

0-01-76

0-24-39

406

412

0-11-37

407

0-400-37

411

413

(1-24-29

416

0402-17

417

0-4000-12

418

(0-27-81

419 0-00-73

421

0-407-16

420

0-06-32

422

10-03-88

423

(0-402-79

424

0-12-24

Total 3-46-77

7165

207

Bachhabal

0-02-71

208

0-12-48

209

0-10-38

210

0-15-85

211

0-05-32

212

0-11-49

213

0-12-56

235

0-16-71

236

0-07-71

234

233

0-10-60

0-14-06

238

232

0-03-08

229

0-13-14

231

0-17-73

230

0-409-55

228

0-02-19

274 0-04-85

Total 1-65-51 Purenota 309

0-01-13

310

0-28-404

306

304

0-00-81

0-34-08

300

000-20

290

0-01-21

298

0-26-89

297

0-01-22

291

0402-70

292

0-10-29

293

(04 ) -73

294

0-02-65

289

0-17-87

287

0-13-74

284

0-17-17

564

11-04-12

532

0-02-41

283

0-00-35

282

0403-52

53.3

10-407-51

552

0-14-95

553

0-14-43

554

0-11-65

558

0-01-27

555

0-405-68

562

0-15-06

565

566

(0-12-41

000-60

568

0-401-59

572

0-29-00

574

0-402-53

Total 2-94-81 IF. No. L - 14014/16/ 2(X)4-G.P. ] SWAMI SINGH , Director 7166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA & 1926

1 नई दिल्ली , 15 अक्तूबर, 2004

का.आ. 2724.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में थूलेन्डी से फूलपुर पाइपलाइन परियोजना तक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्तपाइप लाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री बी.एम. मिश्र, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, बी-35 व 36 , सैक्टर -1 , नोएडा-201 301 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील गाँव

जिला

सर्वे नं. आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए हैक्ट/एयर/ स्क.मी.

1552

(0-402-45

राय बरेली महाराज गंज धूलेन्डी

1551 0-404-65

2323 0-04-02

2307

0-01-88

2311

0-15-93

2310

0-04-33

2312

0-01-28

0-08-27

313

2350

0-04-23

2352

0-13-21

2331

0-01-93

2353

0407-54

2987

2905 0-00-61

2386 0-00-86

0-405-34

2393

2991

0-08-02

2995

0-00-19

2994

0-04-99

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

5 2

0-06-17 थूलेन्डी 2992

राय बरेली महाराज गंज

2339

0-04-08

0-07-75

3027

0-04-13

3028

0-03-46

3029

3026

3032 0-01-63

3033

(0-00-82

3034 0-07-86

3038

0-01-43

3035

0-13-54

3037

0-06-98

(0-10-70

3036

3053

0-12-28

3052 0-04-17

3054

0-08-92

0-02-59

3055

1-86-94

कुल

मलिक पुर 214 08-60-0

0-07-93

215

0-02-30

216

0-14-66

219

218 0-01-46

221 0-06-40

250

(0-402-46

222

0-14

249 0-01-65

0-08-35

248

0-408-95

247

0-02-92

246

241

(0-19-900

1-01-56

कुल

0-00-49 हरदोई 1625

(0-17-59

1724

1725

0-09-20

0-01-72

1726

1727

0-402-88

1779 0-00-31

1777

0-04-09

0-04-88

1773

1778 0-02-06

0-06-44

1776

1775

0-14-83

0-02-21

1773 7167 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 2

1774

2321

0-12-92

0-01-05 राय बरेली महाराज गंज हरदोई

राय बरेली

हरदोई

महाराज गंज

0-01-77

1740

2327

0-06-21 1772

(0-405-42

सर्वे नं. 2327

0-00-18

2324

1766

के बीच

0-01-06

1767

0-10-56

2324

0-06-96

1765

0-04-69

0-11-43

2326

1468

0-01-87

(नाला) सर्वे 1748

न. 226 0-00-93

0-00-71

0-402-76

1761

0-02-86

2325

1760

0-03-96

(नाला) सर्वे 1751

0-01-88

न. 2325

0-06-07

1750

0-00-52

2660

(0-09-20 1752

0-04-02

2-96-53

कुल

1753

0-02-04

अतरा 404

1697

0-403-32

0-04-57

408

सर्वे नं. 1753 0-11-69

0-19-08

409

व 1678

के बीच

422

0-34-87 1696

0-00-25

421

0-00-74 1678

0-01-03

420

0-06-27 1677

0-01-24

442 0-02-06 1679

441

0-08-86

1696

0-402-16

0-405-05

440

1680

(0-407-48

443

( 0-405-46

1675

439

0-04-36

0-08-73

1681

0-00-15

434

1660

0-02-79

435

0-12-93 1661

0-407-53

436

0-01-87 1659

0-00-23

437

0-08-95 1247

0-01-34

458

0-03-35 2305

0-402-84

459

0-07-32 2304

0-000-82

811

0-04-49 2306

0404-25

830 0-01-90

0-02-48

2307

829

0-401-02

0-07-46

2310

0-02-61

831

2.360

832

0-401-71

0-01-36

2312

0-12-79

0-00-32

810

2353

0-01-12

842

0-03-16

0-07-31

2313

843

0-01-76

0-05-25

2303

841

0-12-15

0-02-72

2302

840

0-00-84

0-02-83

2312

0-08-54

814

0-04-72

2301

850

0-00-79

0-406-95

2316

851 0-00-12

0-07-19

2317

852

(0-405-90) 2318

0-00-35

853

0-11-19

0-05-19

2320

854

0-06-20 7168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

5 राय बरेली महाराज गंज अतरा 896

0-00-51

0-12-02

895

894

0-00-87

890

0-02-22

887

0-13-00

886

0-02-51

0-00-25

884

891

0-00-75

990 0-00-86

987 0-01-67

988

0-05-41

989

986

0-10-62

984

0-05-50

965 0-00-61

963

0-01-12

962

(0-00-90

964 0-09-46

985

0-02-69

सर्वे न. 985

0-01-17

व 959

के बीच

959

0-25-78

958

0-13-67

953 0-00-67

952

0-00-56

950

0-16-99

0-403-34

949

0402-87

951

941

0-11-37

946

0-00-93

1028

0-02-35

0-14-44

1024

1035

0-01-10

3-48-77

कुल

0-24-09

हाजीपुर 364

362

( 04-00

365

0-02-76

366

0-08-86

367

(0-33-90

0-00-68

369

0-05-16

342

0-01-77

398

0-02-19

404

0-00-14

491

403

0-02-97

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1

राय बरेली

0-07-19

401

महाराज गंज हाजीपुर

402

0-11-55

0-17-15

504ए

0-17-77

504बी

505

0-401-74

506बी 0-21-93

503

0-02-98

519

0-403-72

518 0-402-44

515

0-00-71

517

(0404-49

516

(0-407-85

515

0-407-05

534 0-01-05

535

0-08-16

536

0-26-15

2-28-45

कुल

बलाई मऊ 38

0-19-64

0-403-47

0-403-45

0-403-85

0-30-41

कुल

0-29-00

309

पाखनपुर

315

0-400-39

316

0-05-02

318

0-0-14

329

(1-59-90)

(पक्की

0-88-15

सड़क) सर्वे

न. 329

329

0-28-25

337

10-45-84

(कैनाल) सर्वे

(0-57-23

न. 337

337

0-11-39

3-25-31

कुल

बरभुवा

10-04-48

0-00-13

0-01-11

0-37-65

(0-400-500

0-00-85

0-05-31

0-04-300 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7169

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 राय बरेली

0-09-14

राय बरेली

0-08-92 महाराज गंज बरथुवा

महाराज गंज बेनीपुर 48

111

0-00-13

0-07-82 106

0-18-08

0-00-68 107

0-01-55

0-02-21 108

0-07-72

0-00-95 110

0-01-93

0-04-97 109

0-03-22

0-03-49 113

0-00-45

0-14-33 107/1636

0-15-85 121

0-00-59

0-17-39 122

0-07-13

0-00-91

0-05-45

123

0-02-24 124

0-00-47

0-06-61

125

0-08-23

120.

0-00-63

0-30-83 128

0-01-43

0-00-38 129

0-01-07

0-04-11 127

0-05-32

0-12-12 88

0-01-71

0-04-19

0-09-52

131

132

0-38-83

0-01-05

0-00-45

0-05-20

164

373

0-04-36

0-01-01 374

0-14-88

-20

0-06-34 372

0-01-48

0-23-54 368

0-02-80 367

0-05-19

0-00-94 375

0-08-60

0-21-35 366

0-00-11

0-03-42 377

0-02-62

2-30-64

कुल

380

0-01-13

381

0-07-55

0-39-00

इन्धोरा 84

383

0-16-01

0-00-65 379

0-04-59

0-00-72

299

0-02-89

0-10-84

298

0-02-40

0-18-31 287

0-02-30

141

0-07-82 297

0-00-74

0-02-89

140

296

0-02-30

139

0-26-04 378

0-01-05

138

0-00-21 316

0-00-74

सर्वे नं. 137 295

0-01-88

व 132

0-00-22

0-01-04

294

केबीच 283

0-23-38

132

286

0-01-13

142

0-00-84

0-05-65

287

144

00499 279

0-00-85

0-09-84

146

145

2-80-80

कुल

0-04-60 7170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

5 2

राय बरेली

0-07-56

214

महाराज गंज इन्धोरा 152

राय बरेली

0-00-41

राय बरेली घूनावर

153

0-15-52

228

0-05-34 154

0-02-32

227

0-17-74

0-04-58

155

218

0-09-78

0-23-40 157

222

0-00-18 156

0-02-49

222/1126

0-20-27

220

173

0-02-40

0-08-13

221

सर्वे न. 173

0-05-44

व 168

223

0-31-10 के बीच

358

0-59-21 168

.0-04-36

(कच्ची

175

0-01-12

0-402-89

रोड़) सर्वे 164 .

नं. 358में

0-00-61

166

0-00-76

359

0-21-28

0-02-70

167

362

(0-04-40 340

0-00-55

सर्वे नं. 359

0-404-99

व363 के 341

बीच

0-24-200

342

363

(0-24-41)

0-32-30

469

364

2-44-71

कुल

365

0-05-26

306

0-402-82

0-14-03 मलिक पुर 349

राय बरेली

365

0-20-49

0-25-17

बन्ना 348

383

0-00-83 346

0-13-24

347

384

0405-30

0-08-10

173

0-02-50

0-13-62

345

172

0-18-72 341

0-19-92

170

0-03-11 340

0-19-54

384

339 0-06-16

0-03-38 332

168/1127

0-13-07

388

338

0-27-21

0-02-02

157

0-405-58

0-01-41

333

156

0-11-20 331

0-04-31

0-08-60

330

4-17-92

कुल

329

0-10-82

1370

0-00-48

बावन

326

0-03-19

1382

0-12-78

1-49-19

कुल

13,72

बुगूर्ज (बल्ला)

0-08-60

1375

0-402-38

0-402-68

घूनावर 23 (रोड़)

0-02-48

1373

0-05-13

1380

0-12-84 9

0-05-75

1379

0-09-21

0-06-89

1442

0-02-56

0-21-81

0-15-35 7 .

1443

0-16-51

0405-42 18

1444

0-01-35

1665

0-33-56 47

0-05-45

0-02-71

1661

212

0-15-90 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7171 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

5 राय बरेली राय बरेली बावन 1667

0-08-84

-राय बरेली राय बरेली बावन 2305

1668

0-00-55

बुगूर्ज

2398

0-13-97

बुगूर्ज

1669

0-06-29

(बल्ला)

2399

0-01-73

(बल्ला)

1670

0-21-56

2400

0-01-63 1671

0-00-45

2401

0-18-54 1672

0-05-63

2416

0-04-03 1673

2415

0-01-22

0-11-12.

1674

0-02-87

2411

0-01-45 1676

2412

0-03-88 1675

1-50

2413

0-06-26 1704

2414

0-05-97

0-00-47

1702

0-09-13

(कैनाल)

2167

0-06-81

1701

0-12-82

2137

0-00-83 1716

0-05-80

2136

0-00-88 177

0-06-01

2142

0-55-24 1718

0-10-54

2133

(-14-94 1720

0-18-67

2127

0-02-73

001-16

1721/5615

2124

00-17-60 2200

(-27-401

0-03-60 2199

0-08-77

2048

0-00-41 2201

0-02-04

0-27-67

2123

2198

0-00-56

2121

0-04-93 2202

0-01-57

2050

0-00-44 2211

0-00-63

2120

0-20-39 2212

0-02-86

2000

(-18-52 2197

0-00-96

2108

0-10-59 2196

2107

0-23-89 2195

0-00-24

2103

0-22-11 2194

0-04-13

2104

0-05-52 1749

0-23-27

2102

0-10-71 2191

0-12-37

2099

0-07-45 2190

0-30-51

2068

0-44-70 2184

(0-10-11

2097

0-71-62 (रोड़) सर्वे

2096

0-08-12

0-05-83

नं. 2184

3297

0-71-83 व 2190

2187

0-05-61

9-85-29

कुल

2188

0-403-02

0-25-00

थूलवास 202

2179

0-02-19

536

0-02-88 2178

0-00-95

535

0-03-16 2180

0-11-56

534

0-24-04 2176

0-403-71

203

0-03-34 2172

0-30-21

531

0-02-09 2406

532

0-01-35

0-01-80

2396

0-01-51

530

0-09-92 2397

0-01-78

213

0-02-47 3139 G1/04-11 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8, 1926

7172

2 3

882

राय बरेली राय बरेली थूलवास

0-15-34

527

राय बरेली राय बरेली थूलवास

0-16-34

854

525

0-24-03

855

0-02-76

526

0-10-79

851

0-01-86

522

0-15-23

858

0-50-60

521

0-02-42

859

517

0-04-18-

859/1781

0-00-49

516

003-33

861

0-04-54

549

0-01-45

842

0-13-50

506

836

0-00-51

0-11-53

495

0-07-41

838

0-04-33

505

0-11-01

863

0-403-56

496

0-00-23

839

0-407-59

501

0-09-68

837

0-407-55

504

(कार्ट ट्रक)

0-02-83

503

0-401-51

840

(0402-58

502

0-03-09

826/1678 सर्वे नं. 503

0-407-50

825

0-403-25

व 562 के

बीच

सर्वे नं . 826/

1678व

(कार्ट ट्रक)

824के

562

बीच

0-01-86

सर्वे नं . 562

सर्वे नं. 826/

0-400-37

व 597 के

0-10-35

1678 व

बीच

824के

0-18-64

597

बीच

594

0-20-63

824

0-01-80

0-08-19

593

0-08-31

823

0403-29

592

0-07-24

971

(0-14-41

591

0-07-94

086

009-89

585

0-79-82

981

0-05-11

590

कुल

0-03-19

586

(0-27-20

लोधवा मऊ 200

0-00-21

587

584

0-01-71

0-06-82

581 0-400-11

0-23-00

0-01-35

582

0-06-28

0-04-43

583

(0-17-10

0-13-72

658

0-03-08

657

0-401-79

0-00-13

0405-83

656

0-403-53

655

0-403-17

0-407-03

643

0-15-48-

0-06-72

659

0-402-24

0-34-57

660

0-10-87

884

0-16-81

0-400-10

885

0-402-57

0-401-11

883 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

7173

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8, 1926

1 1

राय बरेली राय बरेली लोधवा मऊ 97

0-04-53

राय बरेली

0-09-81

0-19-88

0-03-70

0-17-82

0-00-44

85.

0-19-29

224

0-05-49

0-00-52

430

0-11-27

0-02-72

434

433

0-07-11

432

0-15-67

447

0-14-45

0-17-34

454

455

0-16-65

453 0-01-09

456

0-04-53

429

0-17-47

463

0-01-39

0-07-50

464

465

0-00-57

3-24-23

कुल

0-03-66

पहाड़ीपुरी ४८

0-01-41

मदनीपुर 438

477

0-18-16

479

0-22-34

003-08

494

0-12-61

493

0-03-62

481

0-01-41

484

485

0-02-14

492 0-00-69

486

0-26-42

0-00-13

487

489

0-01-04

490

(0-29-70

491

0-01-42

535

0-01-69

532

0-24-66

536

537

0-02-19

0-00-77

538

0-02-15

539

543

0-09-58

540

0-10-57

541

0-03-64

1-83-18

कुल

5 3

0-12-46 मरदानपुर 28

राय बरेली

0-403-59

(0-12-54

0-28-40

0-00-33

0-01-75

0-01-91

0-40-83

0-06-64

0-03-35

53 001-46

0-07-05

0-03-31

0-19-59

0-00-36

0-16-74

0-05-11

0-15-77

(0-14-82

109

0-02-54

110

0-11-16

146

0-00-95

147

0-00-93

0-20-96

140

0-00-54

114

139

0-00-91

138

0-00-83

0-402-17

137

134

0-01-59

133

0-00-87

0-04-61

141

132

10-09-75

0-05-16

131

0-02-56

204

0-20-87

202

0-00-52

213

201

0-00-84

214 0-00-96

10-02-37

200

0-08-62

215

0-26-43

221

223

10-01-52

224

0-01-41

सर्वेन.

224 व 231 0-13-79

के बीच 7174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 26

PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

एक चरेली

0-17-39

राय बरेली राय बरेली चक पीरा

0-17-08 राय बरेली

231

मरदानपुर

232

0-02-07

शाह

0-09-35 230

0-03-93

0-02-01 229

0-03-73

0-00-64

0-00-75

228

0-00-48

0-22-15

227

0-12-42 233

0-12-77 402

0-00-15

0-02-39 226

0-00-97

0-05-41 404

0-15-36

140

0-17-34 405

0-00-73

141

0-05-40 403

0-14-37

142

0-12-78

0-05-09

399

138

0-05-99

0-02-79

397

143

0-00-42 396

0-19-38

144

0-00-44

152

0-00-25

4-47-83

कुल

153

0-02-21

0-24-78

रासेहेथा 528

160

0-04-94 525

0-21-60

0-28-57

161

524

0-11-76

166

0-00-18 123

0-03-98

167

0-24-88 535

0-00-21

168

0-12-94 520

0-02-93

0-13-81

169

537

0-03-02

171

0-02-95 536

0-02-25

170

0-16-29 519

0-21-31

492

0-15-34

2-11-

कुल

539

0-09-97

0-00-55

सन्धेनागीन 332

0-03-69

331

(-19-42

0-00-36

325

0-14-73

540

0-01-01

330

0-11-63 541

0-45-15

344

0-20-37

0-00-28

546

0-12-29

345

0-02-69

548

305

0-00-36

0-04-23

सर्वेन.

474

0-402-52

305 व346 0-01-32

0-26-21

के बीच

729

0-00-84

346

0-16-34 730

0-16-80

347

0-24-96 731

0-10-20

351

0-401-94 732

0-00-64

348 0-06-86

0-02-21

733

349

0-06-58 735

0-00-35

354

0-07-71 777

0-15-72

350

0-01-77 780

0-26-74

250

0-63-58 784

0-10-05

249

0-21-11

353

3-09-56

कुल

0-01-40 7175 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

0-01-12

राय बरेली

0-00-87

सन्धेनागीन 398

राय बरेली राय बरेली

राय बरेली जलालपुर 247

0-04-54

248

(रजवाहा

0-02-03

249

कैनाल)

0-03-29 सर्वे न. 249

0-04-56

250

(रजवाहा

0-09-70

288

0-00-78

कैनाल)

0-01-59

251

सर्वेन . 353

0-06-55

253

0-09-96

254

(रजवाहा कैनाल) 0-00-86

सर्वे न. 398

0-06-98

255

0-03-10

287

(रजवाहा कैनाल)

256

0-11-98 सर्वे न . 241

0-08-97

284

0405-22

283

(रजवाहा कैनाल)

सर्वे न. 231

260

0-01-80

0-00-17

0-02-30 231

0-402-77

282

230

0-07-09

0-05-51

280

0-01-26

0-05-67

229

281

0-00-83

228

279

(0-17-24 232

277

0-03-62

233

276 0-08-64

0-08-91

274

234

0-06-63

10-03-56

275

0-000-27

236

0-403-75 235

0-05-92

308

0-20-50

238

1-80-31

कुल

सर्वे न. 238

0-407-46

( एसएच

(0-4(X)-47

लालपुर

34)

0-00-94

चौहान 93

458

0-16-67

0-14-08

459

10-03-18

0-401-46

457

(0-04-10)

0-08-15

0-00-59

462

0-00-31

164

463

0-16-92

165

464

0-01-51

0-407-46

0-19-08

168

0-09-19

465

0-01-10

172

0-04-28

482

0-10-02

177

480

176

0-13-92

481

001-46

0-11-78

175

3-61-61

0-05-76 कुल

173

0-15-47

174

0-14-79

जलालपुर 218

0-01-12

186

219

(0-37-47

188

0-06-84

0-405-67

217

0-01-29

202

0-00-49

216

0-17-18

208

221

0-17-56

0-09-07

210/607

0-05-53

240

0-03-16

245

0-03-98

241

0-05-31

213

0-03-16

242 7176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8, 1926

214

0-06-85 राय बरेली राय बरेली लालपुर

216

0-08-53

चौहान

243

0-01-14

242

0-01-25

0-06-70

227

(नाला) सर्वे

0-01-04

न. 227

228

0-10-03

0-06-54

229

230

0-02-69

0-00-94

231

232

0-03-84

233

0-01-18

0-16-57

234

2-45-69

कुल

0-14-99

278

बुवापुर कलां

0-02-83

(पक्की सड़क)

सर्वे न.

278

278/409 0-28-22

281

0-01-78

0-06-43

280

(0-04-79

390

(0-20-25

391

396

0-09-78

388

0-06-41

0-29-35

387

397

0-15-48

0-01-84

383

382

0-18-49

0-12-17

381

1-72-81

कुल

0-10-17

राजुआपुर 1

0-18-60

0-36-97

0-05-81

0-00-11

0-25-59

0-18-60

123

127

0-03-65

121

0-30-58

119

0-17-89

0-12-95

118

117

0-00-22

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

0-05-92

राय बरेली राय बरेली

133

राजुआपुर

सर्वे नं. 133 0-04-46

व 284 (रोड़)

284

0-409-93

277

0-02-96

0-00-46

271

0-02-90

278

281

0-04-30

279

276

0-00-17

272

0-11-16

270

0-03-07

269

259

0-04-44

(0-28-59

301

सर्वे नं. 0-03-73

301 (रोड़)

305

00-18-28

0-06-96

सर्वेनं. 305 व 303 (रजवाहा कैनाल)

303

0-02-83

307 0-00-17

304

0-12-29

256

0-01-12

338

0-20-45

339

0-12-99

337

0-04-26

0-02-19

343

344

0-30-88

342

0-04-37

349

0-35-70

361

0-01-15

362

0-08-40

348

0-00-14

363

0-03-48

4-40-30

कुल

2295

पोथाई

0-15-20 सालोन

2314

0-16-15

0-06-70

2322

0-00-76

2324

0-10-42

2321

2320

0-02-64

0-00-77

2319

2317

0-01-52 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

1 राय बरेली सालोन पोथाई 2346

0-29-72

राय बरेली

2348 0-11-98

2349

0-01-56

0-04-87

2276

2393

0-04-06

2394

0-31-98

2423

0-01-73

2424

0-05-43

2408

0-02-51

2407

0-00-19

2406

0-02-55

0-38-85

2405

2402

( 0407-60

2962

0-00-89

2972

0-18-21

2972/3.303 001-04

2974

0-35-99

2967

0-00-89

2975

(0405-57

3026

0-18-99

3120

0-01-20

3029

3027

0-05-94

3028

0-02-29

3030

0-403-37

3032

0-00-61

3117

0-40-08

3116

003-04

3131

0-00-43

3115

0-18-67

0-01-75

3111

3101

0-00-73

3100

10-43-53

3008

0-11-88-

3083

0-403-93

3249

0402-79

3077

10-22-55

3076

0-402-64

3074

0-33-61

3075

0-401-21

3250

0-31-84

3254 0-00-21

0-18-96

3252

3263

0-00-33

3262.

10-06-98

3255

7177 2

5 सालोन

3272

0-20-35 पोथाई

3261

0-03-22

3274

0-18-01

5-79-12

कुल

0-04-19 बिकापुर

0-24-08

0-13-52

0-01-03

0402-71

()-19-89

0-02-34

0-37-54

( 0-000-100

1-07-20

कुल

0-68-34 ब्रमजीतपुर 2

0-29-48

0-17-28

(0-10-85

1-25-95

कुल

0-05-59 घाटमपुर

0-02-09

0-405-72

0-36-14

(0-0-56

10-07-82

10-08-72

0-01-18

0-06-77

0-02-87

0-100-73

0-06-87

0-02-20

0-00-68

0-402-77

0-01-03-

0-01-34

0-00483

()-( - 78

0444-38 7178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-11-92

राय बरेली राय बरेली सालोन घाटमपुर

0-16-01

0-04-01

0-01-78

396

406

0-11-40

405

0-02-60

404

403

0-02-41

410

0-03-14

0-06-17

402

414

0-25-08

0-05-47

412

413

0402-57

416

0-02-08

417

0-04-64

415

0-00-73

418

419

0-01-12

420

0-01-18

421

0-04-61

0-405-35

सर्वे न. 421

(रजवाहा कैनाल)

0-00-29

428

2-62-83

कुल

0-07-26

अटवा

0-04-37

0-19-27

00-00-10

13/1395

0-01-44

0-00-69

0-08-17

0-03-16

0-03-67

0-00-95

21 0-02-06

0-05-45

0-14-77

0-06-24

0-01-31

0-17-28

358

0-22-30

357

0-00-63

365

0-03-18

356

35 0-00-46

0-00-61

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

5 2

0400-35 अटवा

सालोन

355

0-400-37

353

0-03-52

354

0-22-75

352

0-09-13

351

002-82

350

378

( -20-200

349

0-403-19

(रोड़) सर्वे

न. 349

0-07-15

386

0-12-51

344

387

0-35-91

0-409-30

388

0-09-95

485

486

0402-92

487

0-03-68

495

001-61

...490

0-400-02

0-10-23

488

521

489

0-05-53

0-01-47

520

0-21-27

512

001-71

513

0-00-92

514

0-24-74

516

0-03-01

653

0-00-28

515

0-408-20

654

0-400-24

657

656

0-402-37

655 0-08-05

670

0-10-13

(0-02-90

671

669

(14)4-78

0-12-73

666

0-00-75

674

0404-37

675

003-74

677

0-00-79

678

0-05-34

679

009-75

666

0-02-24

665

0-407-77

682 [ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7179

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

3 .

0-04-08

राय बरेली

अटवा 683

सालोन

राय बरेली

0-05-28

684

0-10-85

685

0-08-24

686

0-04-33

689

0-03-26

690

707

0-09-88

10-07-10

708

0-18-28

706

0-00-78

705

0-01-96

704

0-16-55

703

0-01-51

702

0-04-53

698

0-18-49

699

700

0-03-65

0-01-81

701

0-06-74

714

5-58-08

कुल

0-06-44

साराउदौला 97

0-17-32

0-01-11

100

103 0-11-46

0-00-16

0-01-81

104

0-11-30

105

0-03-74

0-05-16

0-03-02

0-02-75

0-19-73

0-01-13

0-49-74

0-03-98

133

1-38-85

कुल

0-11-74

जगतपुर 122

123 0-67-60

(0-03-20

143

0-13-13

137

0-12-78

133

132 0-06-06

0-05-45

124

3139 G1/04-12

5 2

131

0-08-54 सालोन जगतपुर

125

0-04-99

0-06-36

(पक्कीरोड़) सर्वे नं. 125

व 569के

बीच

569

0-53-20

0-01-97

564

0-34-94

562

0-01-17

(जगतपुर

रजवाहा कैनाल) सर्वे

नं. 562

0-11-97

537

0-07-10

538

0-04-81

539

0-00-15

541

0-04-35

537

0-05-73

540

0-05-17

542

0-07-54

536

(0-18-48

534

535

0-01-89

545

0-34-30

524

0-402-14

528

3-32-86

कुल

पदमपुर

10-10-46

0-04-78

73 0-04-86

0-04-75

0-02-32

0-00-19

0-08-96

0-36-89

0-09-99

99 0-06-68

0-24-94

276

0-03-11

275

0-06-34

277

0-07-26

283

0-00-18

280

0-02-23

282

281

0-67-83

288

0-02-19

272 7180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

1 राय बरेली सालोन

0-10-50

राय बरेली

271

पदमपुर

294

0-00-96

270

0-04-93

0-05-69

265

266

0-20-08

0-02-43

(कार्ट ट्रक)

सर्वे न. 266

व216 के

बीच

216.

0-06-81

222

0-02-11

223

0-02-94

225 0-21-69

0-18-25

224

231

0-01-03

232

0-21-28

233

0-04-04

234

0-07-97

3-34-87

कुल

0-16-92

बीरपुर 34

88 0-06-64

0-21-05

0-00-84

91 0-07-60

0-400-53

103

0-01-82

0-17-92

105

97 0401-80

0-00-51

0-06-04

100

0-02-57

101

0-29-68

116

0-02-08

108

114

0-01-45

0-403-35

113

115

0-12-35

279

0-11-50

284

0-402-70

285

0-400-34

278

0-03-48

280

0-22-31

277

297

0-05-84

299

0-01-49 .

298 0-00-81

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

5 2

सालोन

0-34-44 बीरपुर 302

304

0-13-97

0-00-57

305

275

0-03-46

306

0-01-01

270

0-03-16

271

0-00-45

272

0-14-60

0-09-41

273

0-07-49

274

0-01-10

358

0-04-77

356/57

0-07-79

355

356

0-05-86

374

0-00-49

0-09-46

375

376

0-02-37

0-05-10

379

0-05-66

378

378/396 0-00-61

377

0-02-34

3-15-93

कुल

पाचुवाबारा 19 0-00-81

0-15-23

0-15-42

0-404-26

0-05-61

火)

0-04-95

0-1-1-80

0-21-67

0-401-92

0-00-24

0-400-54

159

0-21-88

161

160

(0-404-44

177

(0402-72

199 0-01-96

10-18-21

198

0-24-54

196

197

0-02-53

0-04-69

195

10-25-26

192

0-401-37

189

0-28-49

186.

185 0-09-01

2009

0-400-18

2-27-73

कुल.

(फा. सं. एल-14014/16/2004-जी.पी. ]

स्वामी सिंह, निदेशक 7181 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 15th October , 2004

0-07-75

Thulendi

Maharaj

3027.

RaiBareilly

0-04-13

3028

Ganj

0-03-46

3029

3026

S.O. 2724. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of gas from Thulendi to Phoolpur pipeline project in the State of Uttar Pradesh, a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;

0-01-63

3032

0-00-82

3033

3034 0-07-86

0-01-43

3038

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

0-13-54

3035

0-06-98

3037

0-10-70

3036

0-12-28

3053

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein.

0-04-17

3052

0-08-92

3054

3055

0-02-59

1-86-94

Total

0-09-80

Malik Pur 214

0-0791

215

0-402-30 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public.objectiwwriting to the laying of the pipeline under the land toShirtBM. Mishra , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, B- 35 & 36 , Sector- 1 , Neida-201301 (Uttar Pradesh).

216

SCHEDULE

0-14-66

219

218

Village

District Tehsil

0-401-46 No. Survey

221 0-06-40

0-02-46

250

Area to be acquired for ROU in/Hect. / Are./Sq Metre

0-14-78

222

249 0-01-65

0-02-45

0-08-35

248

Thulendi 1552

RaiBareilly

0-04-65

1551

0-08-95

247

Maharaj Ganj

0-04-02

0-02-92 2323

246

2307

(0-19-9)

241

0-01-88

0-15-93

2311

1-01-56

Total

0-04-33

2310

0-00-49

1625

Hardoi

0-01-28

2312

0-17-59

1724

0-08-27

2313

0-09-20

1725

0-04-23

2350

(0-02-72

1726

0-13-21

2352

0-02-88

1727

0-01-93

2351

0-40-31

1779

2353

1777

0-407-54

2987

0-04-09

10-04-88

1773

2905

0-02-06

1778

0-00-61

2386 0-00-86

1776

0-06-44

0-05-34

2393

(0-14-83

1775

0-08-02

2991

0-402-21

1773

0-00-19

2995

0-12-92

1774

(0-404-99

2994

0-01-77

1740

0-06-17

2992

0-05-42

1772

(0-404-08

2339 [PART II-SEC. 3 (i ) ] 7182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA

0-06-21 1766

0-01-06

RaiBareilly Maharaj Hardoi 2327

Rai Bareilly Maharaj Hardoi

0-10-56

1767

InBet Svy

Ganj

No. 2327 0-00-18

0-06-96

1765

&2324

0-01-87

1468

2324

0-04-69 1748 0-00-71

2326

(0-11-43

0-02-76

1761

(Nala) In 1760

0-03-96

0-00-93

Svy. No.

226

0-06-07

1751

0-02-86

2325

1750

0-00-52

0-04-02

1752

0-01-88

(Nala) In Svy No. 1753

0-02-04

2325

1697

003-32

2660

0-09-20 InBet Svy 0-11-69

2-96-53

Total

No. 1753

& 1678

Atra 404

0-00-25

0-04-57 1696

408

0-19-08

0-01-03

409

1678

0-34-87

422

0-01-24

1677

0-00-74

421

1679 0-08-86

420

0-06-27 1696 0-02-16

442

0-405-46

1680

0-02-06

441

1675

440

0-05-05

0-08-73

1681

443

0-07-48

0-02-79

1660

0-04-36

439

1661

(407-53

434

0-00-23

1659

0-00-15

435

0-01-34

1247

436

2305

0-02-84

( 001-87

437 0-08-

0-00-82

2304

0-403-35

458

0-404-25

2306

0-407-32

459

002-48

2307

0-04-49

811

2310

0-01-90

830

0-407-46

2360

0-401-36

829

0-12-79

2312

001-02

0-02-61

831

(4) 1-12

2353

0-01-71

832

0-407-31

2313

0-400-32

810

0-405-25

2303

0-03-16

842

40402-72

2302

0-01-76

843

0-12-15

0-402-83

2312

841

840

2301

( 0-404-72

0-00-84

0-08-54

844

2316 0-06-95

0-00-79

850

0-407-19

2317

0-00-12

851

0-400-35

2318

0-05-90

852

2320

0-05-19

0-11-19

853

2321 0-401-05 7183

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004 /कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1-402-97

403

0-06-20

Maharaj Hajipur

854

RaiBareilly

Rai Bareilly Maharaj Atra

0-07-19

Ganj

0-00-51

896

401

Gani

0-11-55

402

0-12-02

895

(0-17-15

504A

0-00-87

894

0-17-77

504B

0-02-22

890

0-01-74

505

0-13-00

887

0-21-93

506B

0-02-51

886

0-402-98

503

0-00-25

884

519

(0403-72

0-00-75

891

0-02-44

518

0-00-86

990

0-00-71

515

0-01-67

987

(0-04-49

517

0-05-41

988

0-07-85

516

989

0-07-05

515

0-10-62

986

0-401-05

534

0-05-50

984

0-08-16

535

965

0-26-15

536

0-00-61

963

0-01-12

2-28-45

Total

962

0-19-64

964

Balai Mau 38

0-09-46

003-47

0-02-69

985

0-403-45

InBet Svy

0-01-17

No. 985 &

0-403-85

959

0-30-41

Total

0-25-78

959

0-29-00

Pakhan Pur 309

0-13-67

958

0-400-39

315

953 0-00-67

0-05-02

316

0-00-56

952

0-00-14

318

0-16-99

950

0-59-90

329

0-03-34

949

0-02-87

951

0-88-15

(Metalled Road) In

0-11-37

941

SvyNo.

0-00-93

329

946

0-02-35

1028

0-28-25

329

0-14-44

1024

0-45-84

337

0-01-10

1035

0-57-23

(Canal) In Svy. No.

3-48-77

Total

337

0-24-09

0-11-39

337 Hajipur 364

362

3-25-31

Total

0-02-76

365

0-04-48

Barhuwa 28

0-08-86

366

0-33-90

367

0-00-13

369

0-00-68

0-05-16

342

0-01-11

0-37-65

0-01-77

398

0-02-19

404

0-00-85

0-00-14

491 7184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-05-31

Rai Bareilly Maharaj Barhuwa 42

0-04-30

Ganj

0-09-14

111

0-00-13

106

0-18-08

107

0-01-55

108

0-07-72

110

0-01-93

109

0-03-22

113

0-00-45

0-00-60

107/1636

121

0-00-59

122

0-07-13

123

0-05-45

124

0-06-61

125

0-08-23

120

0-00-63

128

0-01-43

129

0-01-07

127

0-05-32

0-01-71

131

0-09-52

132

0-01-05

0-05-20

164

373

0-04-36

374

0-14-88

372

0-01-48

368

367

0-05-19

375

0-08-60

366

0-00-11

0-02-62

377

380

0-01-13

0-07-55

381

383

0-16-01

379

0-04-59

299

0-02-89

298

0-10-84

287

0-02-30

297

0-00-74

296

0-02-30

378

0-01-05

316

0-00-74

295

0-01-88

294

0-01-04

283

0-23-38

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 2.

0-01-13

286

RaiBareilly Maharaj Barhuwa

287

0-05-65 Ganj

279

0-00-85

Total 2-80-80

0-08-92 Benipur 48

0-07-82

0-00-68

0-02-21

0-00-95

0-04-97

0-03-49

0-14-33

0-15-85

(0-17-39

0-00-91

0-02-24

0-00-47

0-30-83

0-00-38

0-04-11

0-12-12

0-04-19

0-38-83

22 0-00-45

39 0-01-01

0-00-34

0-23-54

0-02-80

0-00-94

0-21-35

10-03-42

Total 2-30-64 Indhora 84

0-39-00

0-00-65

0-00-72

0-02-40

0-18-31

141

0-07-82

140

0-02-89

0-26-04

139

138

0-00-21

InBet Svy.

No. 137 & 00-000-22

132

132 7185 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8, 1926

5 2

001-35

0-00-84

Ghunawar 18

Rai Bareilly Rai-Bareilly

Rai Bareilly Maharaj Indhora 142

0-05-45 144

0-04-99

Ganj

0-15-90

212

146

0-09-84

0-00-41 145

0-04-60

214

228

0-07-56

152

0-05-34 153

227

0-17-74

(0-15-52

154

218

0-02-32

0-09-78 155

222

0-23-40

0-04-58

0-00-18

157

222/1126 156

0-02-49

220

0-02-40 173

0-20-27

221

0-08-13

0-31-10

223

InBet Svy.

No. 173 & 0-05-44

358

0-59-21 168

168

0-04-36

175

0-01-12

0-02-89

(Mud Road) InSvy. No.358 164

359

0-21-28 166

0-00-61-

362

0-04-40

0-00-76

167

0-02-70

340

0-00-55

0-04-99 341

(InBet Svy. No. 359 and 363) 342.

0-24-20

363

0-24-09

0-32-30

469

364

Total

365

2-44-71

(0-405-26

366

0-14-03

0402-82

Rai Bareilly

Malikpur 349

365

0-20-49

0-25-17

Banna 348

383

0-00-83 346

0-13-24

384

0-08-10 347

0-405-30

173

0-02-50

0-13-62

345

172

0-18-72 341

0-19-92

170

0-03-11

0-19-54

340

384

339 91-90-0

0-03-38

168/1127 332

0-13407

0-27-21

388

338

0-02-02

157

0-05-58 333

0-01-41

156

0-11-20

004-31

331

330

0-08-60-

Total 4-17-92 329

(0-10-82

1370

0-00-48:

Bawan

003-19

326

0-12-78

Bugurg 1382

1-49-19

Total

(Balla) 1372 0-08-60

1375

0-02-38

(0-402-68

23 ( Road )

Ghunawar

1373

0-02-48 10

0405-13

0-12-84-

1380 9

0405-75

1379

0-09-21 8

0-06-89

1442

0-02-56

0-21-81

1443

0-1985 7

0-16-51 7186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

5 1

0-05-42 Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Bawan 1444

1665

0-33-56

Bugurg

0-02-71

1661

(Balla)

1667

0-08-84

0-00-55

1668

1669

0-06-29

1670

0-21-56

0-00-45

1671

1672

0-05-63

1673

0-11-12

1674

0-02-87

1676

1675- 0-21-50

0-00-47

1704

1702

0-06-81

1701

0-12-82

1716

0-05-80

1717 0-06-01

1718

0-10-54

1720

0-18-67

1721/5615 0-01-16

0-27-01

2200

0-08-77

2199

2201

0-02-04

2198

0-00-56

2202

0-01-57

2211

0-00-63

0-02-86

2212

2197

0-00-96

2196

2195

0-00-24

2194

0-04-13

1749

0-23-27

2191

0-12-37

2190

0-30-51

2184

0-10-11

(Road) In

0-05-83

Svy . No.

2184&

2190

0-05-61

2187

2188

0-03-02

2179

0-02-19

2178

0-00-95

2180

0-11-56

2176

0-03-71

2172

0-30-21

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

0-01-80

2406

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Bawan

0-01-51

2396

Bugurg

2397

0-01-78 (Balla)

2305

2398

0-13-97

2399

0-01-73

2400

0-01-63

2401

0-18-54

2416

0-04-03

2415

0-01-22

0-01-45

2411

2412

0-03-88

2413

0-06-26

2414

0-05-97

0-09-13

(Canal)

2167

2137

0-00-83

2136

0-00-88

2142

0-55-24

2133

0-14-94

2127

0-02-73

0-17-60

2124

2047

0-03-60

2048

0-00-41

0-27-67

2123

2121

0-04-93

2050

0-00-44

2120

0-20-39

2060

0-18-52

2108

(0-10-59

2107

0-23-89

2103

0-22-11

2104

0-05-52

0-10-71

2102

2099

0-407-45

2068

0-44-700

0-71-62

2097

2096

0-08-12

3297

(0-71-83

Total 9-85-29

0-25-00 Thulwas: 202

536

0-02-88

535

0-03-16

534

0-24-04

203

0-03-34

531

0-02-09 7187

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926:

[ भाग II- खण्ड: 3(ii) ]

0-06-72

0-01-35

RaiBareilly Rai Bareilly Thulwas 659

532

RaiBareilly Rai Bareilly Thulwas

660

0-34-57 530

0-09-92

0-10-87

0-02-47

884

213

885

527

0-15-34

0-01-11 525

883

882

526

0-02-76

854

0-16-34 522

0-01-86

855

0-24-03 521

0-50-64)

851

0-10-79 517

0-15-23

858

516

-49

0-02-42

859

549

0404-54

0-04-18

0-13-50

859/1781 506

861

0-03-33 495

0-11-53

842

0-01-45

0-04-33

505

0-00-51

836

496

0-403-56

838

0-407-41

0-407-59

501

0-11-01

863

0-407-55

504

00-23

839

503

0-402-83

0-09-68

0-02-58

502

In Bet

0-01-51

Kart Track)

0403-25

Svy: no.

840

503& 562

826/1678 0-03-09

825

(07-50

0-01-86

(Cart Track)

InBet Svy.

562

No. 826/ 0-00-10

1678& 824

0-00-37

InBet Svy no.

InBet Svy.

0-10-35

No.826/

562& 597

1678& 824

0-18-64

597

0-20-63

824

0-01-80

594

0-08-31

82.3

0-08-19

593

971

0-07-24

0-403-29

592

980

0-07-94

0-14-41

591

0-79-82

981

585

Total

0-09-89

590

005-11

0-27-20

Lodhwa

580

003-19

Mau 24

0-00-21

587

10-00-10

0-01-71

0-06-82

584

0-23-66

581 000-11

0-06-28

582

001-35

0-17-10

0-04-43

583

0-03-08

0-13-72

658

0-00-13

657

001-79

10403-53

0-05-83

656.

003-17

655

0-15-48

0417-03

643

3139G1/04-13 7188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

0-402-24 Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Lodhwa 54

Mau

0-16-81

0-02-57

0-04-53

0-09-81

0-19-88

0-403-70

0-17-82

0-00-44

0-19-29

224

0-405-49

0-00-52

430

0-11-27

434

0-402-72

433

0-07-11

432

0-15-67

447

0-14-45

454

0-17-34

455

0-16-65

453

0-01-09

456

0-404-53

429

(0-17-47

463

0-01-39

464

0-07-50

465

0-00-57

Total 3-24-23

0-403-66

Pahadipuri- 86

0-01-41

438

madanipur

477

0-18-16

479

0-22-34

494

0-03-08

493

0-12-61

481

0-03-62

484

0-01-41

485

0-02-14

492

0-00-69

486

0-26-42

487

0-00-13

489

0-01-04

490

0-29-70

491

0401-42

535

0-01-69

532

0-24-66

536

537

0-02-19

[PART II-SEC : 3 (il ) ] 2

0400-77

538

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Pahadipuri-

0402-15

madanipur 539

543

0-409-58

0-10-57

540

0-03-64

541

1-83-18

Total

0-12-46

Mardanpur 28

0-403-59

0-12-54

0-28-40

0-00-33

0401-75

0-401-91

0-40-83

50 0-06-04

0403-35

53 0-01-46

0-07-05

0-03-31

0-19-59

0-00-36

0-16-74

0-05-11

( -15-77

0-14-82

109

110

0402-54

0-11-16

0-00-95

146

147

0-00-93

140

0-20-96

0-00-54

114

0-400-91

139

138

0-00-83

137

0-402-17

134

0-01-59

0-400-87

133

141 0-04-61

132

0-409-75

0-05-16

131

204

0-02-56

(0-20-87

202

0-400-52

213

0-00-84

201

214 0-00-96

200

0-02-37

215

0-08-62 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

0-26-43

221

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Mardanpur

223

0-01-52

224

0-01-41

InBet Svy.

No. 224 & 0-13-79

231

(0-17-39

232

0-02-07

230

0-03-93

229

0-03-73

228

0-00-75

227

0-22-15

233

402

0-00-15

226

0-00-97

404

0-15-36

405

0-00-73

403

0-14-37

399

0-05-09

397

0-02-79

396

0-19-38

Total 4-47-83

0-24-78

Rasehetha 528

525

0-21-60

524

0-11-76

523

0-403-98

535

0-00-21

520

0-02-93

537

0-03-02

536

0-02-25

519

0-21-31

492

0-15-34

539

0-09-97

481

0-03-69

480

0-00-36

540

0-14-73

541

0-45-15

546

0-00-28

548

0-02-69

476

0-04-23

474

0-02-52

475

0-26-21

0-00-84

729

0-16-80

730

0-19-20

731

732 0-00-64

7189

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

0-02-21

733

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Raschetha

735

0-00-35

0-15-72

LLL

780

0-26-74

784

0-10-05

3-09-56

Total

0-17-08

Chak Peera 1

Shah 3

0-09-35

0-02-01 .

0-00-64

0-00-48

0-12-42

0-12-77

0-02-39

0-05-41

140

0-17-34

141 0-05-40

0-12-78

142

138

0-05-99

143

0-00-42

144

0-00-44

152

0-00-25

153

0-02-21

160

0-04-94

0-28-57

161

166

0-00-18

167

0-24-88

168

0-12-94

169

0-13-81

0-02-95

171

170

0-16-29

Total 2-11-94

0-00-55

Sandhenagin 332

331

0-19-42

325

0-01-01

0-11-63

330

0-20-37

344

345

0-12-29

305

0-00-36

InBet Svy.

No. 305 & 0-01-32

346

0-16-34

346

0-24-96

347

0-01-94

351 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 1926

7190

0-14-79

0-06-86

Jalalpur 218

RaiBareilly RaiBareilly

RaiBareilly Rai Bareilly Sandheerega 348

0-06-84

219

0-06-58

349

0-05-67

0-07-71

217

354

0-01-77

350

0-00-49

216

0-63-58

250

0-09-07

221

249

0-21-11

0-05-53

240

353

0-03-98

241

0-01-40

398

242

0-03-16

0-00-87

247

0-01-12

0-02-03

(Minor Canal)

248

0-04-54 In Svy.

0-03-29

249

No.249

0-04-56

250

0-00-78

(Minor Canal)

288

In Svy .

0-09-70

0-01-59

251

No. 353

0-06-55

253

254

(Minor Canal)

96-60-0 In Svy .

0-00-86

255

No. 398

0-06-98

0-03-10

287

256

0-11-98

004-00

(Minor Canal)

284

In Svy.

0-08-97 No. 241

283

0-05-22

260

0-00-17

0-01-80

(Minor Canal)

0-02-30

282

In Svy.

280

0-07-09 No. 231

281

0412-77

231

0-01-26

0-05-51

230

279

0-05-07

229

277

0-00-83

228

276

232

274

0-03-62

008-91 233

0-03-56

275

0-06-63

234

003-75

308

0-11-27

236

1-80-31

Total

0-405-92

235

0-400-47

(1)-200-500

238

Lalpur 92

Chauhan 93 0-00-94 In Svy. No. 238

007-46

(SH-34)

0-14-08

0-03-18

0-16-67

$58

0-04-10

459

0-00-31

164

001-46

0-08-15

457

165

462

0-07-46

168

0-00-59

463

0-16-92

0-19-08

0-01-10

172

001-51

464

177

0-09-19

465

0-10-02

0-04-28

176

482

0-01-46 480

175

()-11-78

00-13-92

0-05-76

173

481

174

(-15-47

3-61-61

Total 7191

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 1

0-01-12

186

Rai Bareilly Rai Bareilly Lalpur

0-37-47

188

Chauhan

0-01-29

202

0-17-18

208

0-17-56

210/607

0-03-16

245

0-05-31

213

0-06-85

214

0-08-53

216

243

0-01-14

0-01-25

242

0-06-70

227

(Nala) In)

Svy . No. 0-01-04

227

0-10-03

228

0-06-54

229

0-02-69

230

0-00-94

231

232

0-03-84

0-01-18

233

0-16-57

234

2-45-69

Total

(0-14-99

278

Buwapur Kalan (Metalled)

0-02-83

Road) In

SvyNo.

}

278

(0-28-22

278/409

0-01-78

281

0-06-43

28)

0-04-79

390

0-20-25

391

0-09-78

396

0-06-41

388

0-29-35

387

0-15-48

397

0-01-84

383

0-18-49

382

0-12-17

381

1-72-81

Total

0-10-17

Rajuapur 1

0-18-60

0-36-97

0-05-61

0-00-11 Rai Bareilly RaiBareilly Rajuapur 6

0-25-59

0-18-60

123

0-03-65

127

0-30-58

121

0-17:89

119

0-12-95

118

0-00-22

117

0-05-92

133

0-04-46

InSvyNos. 133& 284 (Road)

0-09-93

284

277 0-02-96

0-00-46

271

0-02-90

278

281

0-04-30

279

0-00-17

276

0-11-16

272

0-03-07

270

269

0-04-44

259

0-28-59

301

0-03-73

In Svy No. 301 (Road)

305

J0-18-28

0-06-96

In Svy Nos.) 305 & 303 (Minor Canal)

0-02-83

303

0-00-17

307

0-12-29

304

0-01-12

256

0-20-45

338

339

0-12-99

0-04-26

337

0-02-19

343

0-30-68

344

0-04-37

342

0-35-70

349

0-01-15

361

0-08-40

362

0-00-14

348

003-48

363

4-40-30

Total 7192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

2295

Salon Pothal

Rai Bareilly

0-15-20

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 2

3074

Pothal

0-33-61 Salon

Rai Bareilly

2314 0-16-15

2322

0-06-70

2324

0-00-76

2321

0-10-42

2320

0-02-64

2319

0-00-77

2317

0-01-52

2.346

0-29-72

2.348

0-11-98

2349

0-01-56

2276

0-04-87

2393

0-04-06

2394

0-31-98

2423

0-01-73

2424

0-05-43

2408

0-02-51

2407

0-00-19

2406

0-02-55

2405

0-38-85

2402 0-07-60

2962

0-00-89

2972 0-18-21

33030-01-04

2972/

2974

0-35-99

2967

0-00-89

2975

0-05-57

3026

0-18-99

3120

0-01-20

3029

3027

0-05-94

3028

0-02-29

3030

0-03-37

3032 0-00-61

3117 0-40-08

3116

0-03-04

0-00-43

3131

3115

0-18-67

3111

001-75

3101

0-40-73

3100

0-43-53

3098

0-11-88

3083

0-03-93

3249

0-02-79

3077

(1-22-55

3076

0-02-64

3075

0-01-21

3250

0-31-84

3254

0-00-21

3252

0-18-96

3263

0-00-33

3262

0-06-98

3255

3272

0-20-35

3261

0-03-22

3274

0-18-01

Total 5-79-12

0-04-19 Bikapur 4

0-24-08

(0-13-52

0-01-03

0-02-71

0-19-89

0-02-34

0-37-54

Total 1-07-20

0-68-34 Bramjltpur 2

(0-29-48

0-17-28

0-10-85

Total 1-25-95

0-05-59 Ghatampur 5

0-02-09

0-05-72

0-36-14

0-00-56

0-07-82

0-08-72

0-01-18

0-06-77

0-02-87

0-10-73

61 0-06-87

0-02-20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

7193

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

Atawa 33

0-06-24 Salon

Rai Bareilly

Ghatampur 54

Salon

Rai Bareilly

0-00-68

0-01-31

0-02-77

358

0-17-28

0-01-03

357

0-22-30

0-01-34

365

0-00-63 46

0-00-83

356

0-03-18

0-00-78

35 0-00-46

0-44-38

41 0-00-61

0-11-92

0-00-35

0-16-01

355

353

0-04-01

0-00-37

396

354

0-01-78

0-03-52

0-11-40

352

0-22-75

406

405

351

0-09-13

350

0-02-60

0402-82

404

378

403

0-02-41

003-00

349

0-20-20 410

0-03-14

402

0-06-17

0403-19

(Road) in Svy. No

414

0-25-08

349

412

0-05-47

0-07-15

386

0-02-57

413

344

0-12-51 416

0-02-08

387

0-35-91 417

0-04-64

388

0-09-30 415

485

0-09-95

418

0-00-73

486

0-402-92 419

0-01-12

487

0-03-68 420

0-01-18

495

421

0-01-61

490

0-00-62

0-04-61

0-05-35

488

0-10-23

521

In Svy No.) 421 (Minor Canal)

489

005-53

0-00-29

428

520

001-47

Total

2-62-83

512

0-21-27

0-07-26

Atawa 10

513

0-01-71

0-04-37

514

0-00-92

0-19-27

516

0-24-74

13/1395

653

0-03-01

0-01-44

515

0-00-28

0-00-69

654

0-08-20 24

0-08-17

657

0-00-24 23

0-03-16

656

0-02-37 20

0-03-67

655

0-08-05

0-00-95

670

0-10-13 21

671

0-02-90

0-02-06

0-05-45

669

0-04-78 25

0-14-77

666 0-12-73Rai THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7194

0-00-75 Salon Atawa 674

Bareilly

0-04-37

675

0-03-74

677

678

0-00-79

0-05-34

679

666

0-409-75

0-02-24

665

0-07-77

682

0-04-08

683

0-05-28

684

685

0-10-85

686

0-08-24

0-04-33

689

0-03-26

690

0-09-88

707

708

0-03-10

706

0-18-28

0-00-78

705

0-01-96

704

0-16-55

703

0-01-51

702

0-04-53

698

0-18-49

699

0-03-65

700

0-01-81

701

0-06-74

714

Total 5-58-08

0-06-44

Saraudula 97

0-17-32

100

0-01-11

103

0-11-46

0-00-16

0-01-81

104

0-11-30

105

0-03-74

0-05-16

0-03-02

0-02-75

0-19-73

0-01-13

0-49-74

0-03-98

133

1-38-85

Total

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

5 1

0-11-74 Salon

Bareilly

Jagatpur 122

0-67-60

123

143

0-03-20

0-13-13

137

0-12-78

133

132 0-06-06

124

0-05-45

0-08-54

131

125

0-04-99

0-06-36

(Metalled Road) In Bet Svy. Nos . 125& 569

0-53-20

559

0-01-97

564

0-34-94

562

10-01-17

(Jagatpur Minor Canal) in Svy.no.562

537

0-11-97

0-07-10

538

539

0-04-81

541

0-04-35

537

0-05-73

540

0-03-17

542

0-07-54

536

0-18-48

534

0:00-10

535

545

0-01-89

524

0-34-30

0-02-14

528

3-32-86

Total

Padumpur 71 0-10-46

004-78

004-86

004-75

0-02-32

0-00-19

67 0-08-96

0-36-89

0-09-99

0-06-68

0-2494

276 [भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7195

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

0-03-11

Bareilly Salon.

275

Padнириг:

Bareilly

277

0-06-34

283

0-07-26

280 0-00-18

282

0-02-23

281

288:

0-06-83

0-02-19

272

271

0-10-503

294

(M14-93

265

0-05-69

266

0-20-08

(Cart

Track) in 0-02-43

Bet Svy.Nos

266 & 216

216

222

0-02-11:

046-81

223

002-04

225

0-21-69

224

0-18-25

231

001-03

232

0-21-28

233

234

0407-97

004-04

Total

3-34-87

0-16-92

Beerpur

00601

0-21-05

0-400-84

0-407-60

000-53

103

0-01-82

105

0-17-92

0401-80

0-00-51

100

0402-57

0-29-68

116 0-02-08

108

114

001-45

003-35

113

115

0-12-35

279

0-11-50

284

(0402-70

285

000010

278

0-00-34

280

003-48

277

0-22-31

297 0405-84

3139 G1/04-14

0-01-49

299

Salon Beerpur

298

302

0-34-44

0-0081

304

0-13-97

305

0-00-57

275

003-46

306

001-01

270

0-03-16

271

0-00-45

272

0-14-60

273

0-09-41

274

0-07-49

358

0-01-10

356/57 0404-77

355

0-07-79

356

374

005-86

375

0-00-49

376

0-402-37

379

005-10

0-05-06

378/396

00061

0402-34

Total 3-15-03 Pachuvabara 19

0-15-23

0-15-12

004-26

0-05-61

0-04-95

0-11-80

0-21-67

0401-92

0-400-24

159

0400-54

161

0-21-88

160

004-44

177

(04)2-72

199

אען

00196

0-18-21

196

0-24-54

197

0412-53

195

004-69

192

0-25-26

189

061-37

186

(1-28-49

185

2010

18:

Total 2-27-73 JF. No. L - 14014/16/2004-G.P.

SWAMI SINGH, Directer 7196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. . 2725.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नौम्य पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम. वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [भागे II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7197

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

अनुसूची तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

74 पाचेगाँव बुद्रूक

मीटर

हेक्टर एयरावर्ग उप-खण्ड सं.

00 93 51

00 07 96

00 21 67

00 17 75

00 13 88

00 05 58 1

00 05 57

00 21 70

00 05 22

00 18 65

00 08 91

00 00 15

00 08

88से 100

00 26 01

00 03 45

गट नंबर 88 से 100

में नाला

102

104

105

206

204

00 23

00 08 18

00 07 12

00 00 72

00 05 57

00 15 83

गट नंबर 204 और

179 के बीच में

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

179

178

176

135

136

137

160

159

158

154

00 21 18

00 16 77

00 23 45

12 34

00 03 25

00 10

00 13 25

00 15 68

09 7198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8.

PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] तालूका: सांगोला

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

हेक्टर एयरा वर्ग मीटर सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

157

00 00 05

156

00 .03 03 पाचेगाँव बुद्रूक (निरंतर )

00 10 91

155

गट नंबर 155 और

641 के बीच में

00 07 47

नाला

641

00 04 23

628

00 24

626

$627

00 13

00 23 12

625

622

621

00 05 03

620

00 06 83

619

00 12 85

00 02

615

00 11 39

613

00 01

518

00 21 14

517

516

00 27 98

514

00 03 57

00 09 21

513

गट नंबर 513 और

505/3 के बीच की

00 05

भूमि

505

00 04

507

00.04 12

506

00 04 37

505

00 03

505

00 08 39

504

00 21 63

428

00 65 54

गट नंबर 428 के बीच

00 03 08

में मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 21 34

430

00 54 91

440

439

00 00 31 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

7199

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

459 पाचेगाँव बुद्रूक

460 (निरंतर)

467

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयरवर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 05 42

00 53 72

00 04 93

गट नंबर 460,467

और गाँव सीमा

00 17 47

कोंबडवाडी के बीच

में नाला 2

कोंबडवाडी

कुल: 09 56 80

सर्वे नंबर 266,267

और गाँव सीमा

00 04 91

पाचेगाँव बुद्रूक के पास

का नाला

266

267

268

269

270

272

271

274

275

276

286

2946 कोले

2947

2948

2949

2950

2951

2952

00 07

00 04

00 06 13

00 06

16 42

00 06

00 17

00 14

00 25 93

28 72

कुल : 01 39 03

00 48

00 04 64

00 11

00 19 62

00 24

00 26 79

गट नंबर 2952 और

00 04

2931 के बीच का

प्रमुख जिला मार्ग 78

2931

2929

2926

2925

2924

00 20 32

00 07 42

00 19 55

00 03

00 05 7200

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

हेक्टर एयरवर्ग मीटर कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

7 8 3

कोले

00 10 50

2922

00 17 21

2921

(निरंतर )

2918

00 12 34

2917

00 07

2916

00 07

2915

00 05

2914

2913

00 01 92

00 21 10

2910

गट नंबर 2910 और

2706 के बीच में वरार

00 09

देवी नाला

2706

00 06 31

00 04 91

2705

00 06 13

2704

2703

00 07 07

2702

00 81 62

गट नंबर 2702 और

1957 के बीच में

00 02

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

1957

00 40

गट नंबर 1957 और

1964 के बीच की भूमि

गट नंबर 1957 और

00 11 50

1964 के बीचकी भूमि

गट नंबर 1957 और

00 11 11

1964 के बीचकी भूमि

00 14

1964

1966

00 07 01

1967

00 20

गट नंबर 1967 के

बीच में ड्रेन

गट नंबर 1967 और

1794 के बीच का

00 02 22

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1794

00 01 02

00 02 28

1793

1790

00 07 92 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

7201

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : सांगोला

जिला : सोलापुर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

हेक्टर एयरवर्ग मीटर कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 3

कोले

सर्वे नंबर 1790

और 1789 के बीच

00 03 66 (निरंतर )

का नाला

1789

14 69

1782

00 64 27

1784

00 15

1787

00 28 -30

1756

00 44 08

1753

00 18 80

1754

गट नंबर 1754

और 1751 के बीच

00 07 20

की भूमि

1751

00 06 81

1750

00 04 35

00 03

1749

00 06 54

1759

00 02

1748

1745

00 09

1747

00 01 06

1746

1704

00 67 30

गट नंबर 1704 और

1695 के बीच का

00 02 32

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1695

00 49

00 12 56

1691

00 63 76

1693

00 22

1680

00 16

1681

1679

00 28 61

00 24 75

1678

गट नंबर 1678 और

1676 के बीच का

00 05

मार्ग

प्रमुख जिला

7202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8, 1926

तालूका : सांगोला

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 3

कोले

एयरावर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

गट नंबर 1678 और

1676 के बीच में

(निरंतर )

ड्रेन

00 04 83

गट नंबर 1678

और 1676 के बीच

03 27

की भूमि

1676

21 जुनोनी

00 36

कुल: 11 20 03

00 43 51

11 93

00 53

00 01 17

00 00 71

00 22 38

00 28 28

गट नंबर 34 और 31

के बीच की भूमि

132

135

134

133

142

143

00 30 30

00 20 50

00 03

01 35 84

21 4

00 15

00 40

00 09

00 20 87

00 01

00 17

00 01

गट नंबर 143 और

145 के बीच का

मेटल्ड रास्ता

गट नंबर 145 में मेटल्ड रास्ता

145

146

147

00 04.

00 11. 45

00 11

00 03 59 [ भाग - खण्ड ( ii ) ]

7203

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूक्ष्म : सांगोला

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर सं.

4 4

जुनोनी

150

151 (निरंतर)

152

153

154

गट नंबर 154 और

205के बीच में

माला

205

206

207

208

209

210

215

216

217

218

219

288

289

290

295

331

300

301

गट नंबर 300 और

329 के बीच में

नाला

329

326 करंडेवाडी

111 5

गट नंबर 111 के

बीच में मेटल्ड रास्ता

110 3139 G1/04-15

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

74 :00 05

00 10 28

00 18 04

00 23 31

00 36 38

00 01

00.46 99

00.05 22

00 04 60

00 03 49

00 10 65

00 13 83

00 17 07

16 75

00 01 80

00 65

00 13

00 32

00 20 14

00 04 21

00 23

00 13 37

00 24

00 31 57

10 44 84 कुल:

00 18 43

00 03 30

00 21 83 कुल:

PART 11 - SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7204

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7

35: 54

659

हातीद

21 44

658

660

665

00 18

663

00 04 05

गट नंबर 664 में राज्य मार्ग 3

00 38

664

00 30 91

669

00 07

674

670

00 63

671

00 02

559

00 08

558

00 04

557

00 03 87

556

00 08

555

113

गट नंबर 113 और

441 के बीच की भूमि

00 46

107

00 26 62

106

00 00 94

457

00 00 99

458

00 16

455

गट नंबर 455 और

नाला के बीच की भूमि

गट नंबर 358 में नाला

358

00 34 13

359

366

गट नंबर 366 और

00 03

212 के बीच का

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 03 60

212

00 00 39

211

207 7205

भारतः का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

हातीद

205 6

204 (निरंतर)

एयराव मोटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

0028

07 61

गट नंबर 204 और

24के बीच का

00 04

गाडी रास्ता

00 20 65

00 23

बट नंबर 25 और 56

00 06 47

के बीच का प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 62

और

00 10 52

00 30

00 15

गट नंबर 61

00 09

114 के बीचमें नाला

114

00 05

गट नंबर 114 और

00 03

113 के बीच की भूमि

113

111

109

106

107

105

00 22

00 49 74

09 57

00 33 18

00 03 07

00 20

गट नंबर 105 और गाँव

सीमा मिसलवाडी के बीच

00 03

का गाडी रास्ता

314 मिसालवाडी

315 कुल: 09 10 69

00 27 43

55 00

गट नंबर 315 और

00 20 62

197 के बीच की भूमि

197

198

199

200

201

00 09

00 03 26

00 02

0003 7206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA

तालूका: सांगोला

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii))

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का माम

कम सं.

4 7

मिसालवाडी

202

195 (निरंतर )

194

193

192

139

138

एयरवम मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

00 05 55

00 07 02

00 05 26.

00 10 07

00 10 34

गट नंबर 138 और

137 के बीच की

भूमि

137

136

135

140

141

142

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

17 8

उधनवाडी

1139

1140

1141

1143

1146

1150

1148

1151

1147

00 05

00 12 62

00 14 51

00 05 12

00 06

00 03

00 04

00 02

00 03

00 01 68

00 05 26

00 24

00 11 98

02 77 87 कुल:

00 24 52

00 32 27

00 04 70

00 08 13

00 21 90

00 08

00 10 19

00 21 74

00 14 44

1104 से 1117

1118

00 40 88

00 55 20

02 42 55 फुल:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

7207

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 9

723 राजुरी

810

727

805 से 809

गट नंबर 805 से

809 और 729 के

बीच का मेटल्ड रास्ता

729

730

736

गट नंबर 736 और

739 के बीच की

भूमि

734

735

737

732

736से 738

गट नंबर 736 से

738 और 400 से

406 के बीच में

नाला

400 से 406

गट नंबर 375 से

399 में मेटल्ड रास्ता

375 से 399

309

318

313

315

316

317

325

326

327

328

331

329

332 उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

एयरा वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

सं.

6 7 8

00 97 37

00 13 07

00 69

00 06 24

00 10 11

00 13 23

00 34 68

00 51

00 03

00 10

00 02

00 18 70

00 10 15

00 12 14

00 06

00 67 85

00 04 19

00 11 41

00 17 41

00 08

00 10 68

00 10

00 06

00 06 18

00 05

00 12 08

00 12 69

00 05 46

00 03 39

08 7208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर कम सं.

उप -खण्ड सं.

7 8 3

1257

राजुरी

335

00 07 72 (निरंतर)

336

00 06 38

337

00 01 96

338

00 02 39

339

00 17 52

340

00 06

344

345

00 64 75

258

00 12

253

00 11

252

249

00 10 63

248

247

00 05

गट नंबर 247 और

225 के बीच में

00 08

मेटल्ड रास्ता

225

00 09

00 59 84

226

08 24 92

कुल:

वाटांबरे

626

00 11 91

624

00 50 11

00 39 81

623

01 01 83 11

00 01

487

निजामपुर

00 14 09

486

00 21

489

00 15 98

490

00 26 82

491

00 15 39

501

00 27 90

500

00 18 00

499

00 10 47

496

00 27

526

00 09 09

529

गट नंबर 529 और

553 के बीच में मेटल्ड

00 04

रास्ता 7209

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

मीटर गाव का नाम

एयरवर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7

553

544

00 11 54 निजामपुर (निरंतर )

543

40 50

541

02 73

540

533

00 02 80

538

00 02 69

537

00 02

534

00 01 56

00 06

09 06

00 12 30

00 22 88

00 16 25

00 11

03 81

कुल:

00 69

623

अकोला

00 17

619

618

00 13

604

18 32

605

00 31 33

602

00 44

588

गट नंबर 588 में

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

गट नंबर 588 में

रेल्वे लाइन

587

00 10 81

579

29 30

589

00 25

590

00 25

577

00 01 89

576

00 43

575

525

527

528

522

0513

521 7210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

तालूका : सांगोला

[PART HSBC. 3 (ii) ]

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 12

अकोला

520

519 ( निरंतर )

516

513

512

511

हेक्टर एयरावर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

67 8

00 15

700

00 09 91

00 02 87

00 02 66

मट नंबर 511 और 467 के बीच की भूमि

467

466

465

464(पै)

463

462(पै)

461

460

457

455

452

451 13

कहलास

436

437

439

440

441

442

447

448

449

455

456

454

459

457

458

602

601

598

594

599

597

00 08 71

00 33

00 17

00 04

00 02 03

00 02 41

00 02 82

00 06 81

00 10 55

00 04 13

00 07 61

00 01 46

00 00 45 कुल: 07 14 40

00 03 97

00 25 41

00 14

00 07 39

00 08 66

00 07

00 10

00 07

00 15 08

00 09 89

00 01

00 02 46

00 06 27 1

00 61 79

00 06 .35

00 19 71

00 02 08

00 05 95 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7211

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : सांगोला

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

कडलास

596

595 पै (निरंतर )

गट नंबर 595 और

554 के बीच

की भूमि

583

गट नंबर 595 और

554 के बीच की भूमि

554

555

गट नंबर 555 में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

गट नंबर 555 और

660 के बीच की भूमि

660

661

666

665

672

714

733

735

809

गट नंबर 809 और

860 के बीच में राज्य

मार्ग 71

860

गट नंबर 860 और

867 के बीच में मेटल्ड

रास्ता

867

861

862

866 3139 GI/04-16

क्षेत्रफल

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

00 10

00. 17

00 06

00 07

00 84

00 01

00 41

00 02

00 10 08

00 08

00 26

00 04

00 48 34

00 47 46

00 36 34

00 14

01 15

00 02 40

00 19

00 02

00 30 24

00 16 86

00 18 99 7212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : सांगोला

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

कडलास

865

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 17 37

गट नंबर 865 और

(निरंतर)

884 के बीच में मेटल्ड

रास्ता

884

885

890

889

888

927

900

926

925

924

923

922

921

920

919

914

915

00 02

00 21

00 17

00 15

00 19

00 21

00 06

00 04

00 08

00 05

00 06

00 01

00 04

00 06

00 12

00 02

00 15

गट नंबर 915 और

1183 के बीच

में नाला

1183

1182

1181

1180

00 06 89

00 18 58

00 16 91

00 05 22

00 05 64

गट नंबर 1180 और

00 43

1208 के बीच

की भूमि

गट नंबर 1180 और

1208 के बीच

की भूमि

00 22

गट नंबर 1208 में

00 03 17

मेटल्ड रास्ता

1208

1209

1210

00 22 29

00 16 58

00 10 89 7213

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004 /कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

तालूका : सांगोला

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

7 8

00 19

1212

कडलास

00 24

1213

1219

(निरंतर )

1221

00 13 98

1230

00 11

1231

00 13 02

1234

00 07

1235

1236

15 89

1239

00 06

1240

00 21

1241

00 04

1242

00 17

1243

00 24

1257

00 47

1256

00 07

1255

1254

00 06 81

1253

00 09

1250

00 26 51

1251

00 00 48

1252

गट नंबर 1251 और

00 09

गाँव सीमा मेडशिंगी के

बीच में कोरडा नदी

14 85

कुल:

मेडशिंगी

गट नंबर 291 और

00 09

गाँव सीमा कडलास के

बीच में कोरडा नदी

00 08

291

गट नंबर 291 में

00 04

मेटल्ड रास्ता

306

00 42

306

00 11 19

309

310

311

313

00 24

317 7214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8. 1926

तालूका : सांगोला

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 14

मेडशिंगी

318

328 ( निरंतर)

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 38 54

00 15 04

गट नंबर 328 और

375 के बीच में

00 08 36

अपरुपा नदी

375

374

373

372

00 34 65

00 11 54

00 19 65

00 07

गट नंबर 372 और

411 के बीच में

00 03

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

411

412

413

414

416

417

420

423

424

425

427

428 वाडेगाँव

614

00 16 20

00 17

00 10 86

00 10

00 44

00 27

00 26 37

00 11

00 12 98

00 07 53

37 कुल: 05 82

00 21 19

00 40 51

613/1, 613/2

608

607

00 14 43

00 15 19

00 22

597, 600 , 601 , 602

602

599

00 18 7215 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : सांगोला

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

हेक्टर एयरा वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7

वाडेगाँव

गट नंबर 599 और

584 के बीच की

00 25 (निरंतर)

भूमि

00 07

584

00 07 02

583

00 09

584

00 16

582

17 39

581

00 50

578

00 06

568

00 07

567

00 09 81

566

00 06

564

गट नंबर 564 और

की

447 के बीच

00 03

भूमि

गट नंबर 564 और

447 के बीच

00 04 95

की भूमि

00 03

447

गट नंबर 447 और

की

556 के बीच

00 13 91

भूमि

00 13 91

556

00 07 56

555

गट नंबर 555 और

496 के बीच

00 06 41

की भूमि

गट नंबर 555 और

00 07

496 के बीच की भूमि

00 06 91

496 7216

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका: सांगोला

जिला : सोलापुर

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

मीटर

क्षेत्रफल एयरावर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 496 और

00 01 92

501 के बीच की भूमि

वाडेगाँव (निरंतर )

गट नंबर 496 और

00 04 03

501 के बीच की भूमि

00 02

गट नंबर 496 और

501 के बीच की भूमि

05 85

501

506

गट नंबर 506 और

490 के बीच में राज्य

00 05

मार्ग 3

00 07

490

00 04 82

491

00 04 35

492

06 32

493

गट नंबर 493 और गाँव

00 10 49

सीमा राजापुर के बीच की भूमि

04 36 96

कूल:

00 36 61

राजापुर

00 49 99

00 43 60

गट नंबर 90 और 84

00 02

के बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 18 13

00 17

79 7217 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : सांगोला

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7 2

00 00 71

राजापुर

00 57 25

(निरैतर )

00 59 26

03 59 38

कुल:

[फा. सं. आर-31015/19/2004- ओ.आर-11 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 20th October, 2004

S. O. 2725.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And whereas ,it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District , Maharashtra -412 201 7218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

PACHEGAON

74 1

73 BUDRUK

Area

Sub - Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are

00 93 51

00 07 96

00 21 67

00 13 88

00 05 58

00 05

21 70

05 22

00 18 65

00 20

00 08 91

00 15

17 41

00 08 87

26 01

88 to 100

Nala in Gat No

88 to 100

102

104

105

206

204

00 08 18

00 07 12

00 00 72

00 05 57

15 83

03 42

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

204 & 179

179

178

176

135

136

137

160

159

158

154

21 18

00 16 77

23 45

12 34

03 25

00 10 85

13 25

15 68

00 00

00 7219

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Taluka : SANGOLA

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

157 PACHEGAON

156 BUDRUK

155 (Conta.)

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

8 5

00 00 05

03 03

10 91

Nala in between

GatNo

00 07 47

155 & 641

641

628

626

627

625

622

621

620

619

615

613

518

517

516

514

513

Area in between

GatNo

513 & 505/3

505

507

506

505

504

428

Metalled Road in

Gat No 428

430

440

439 3139 G1/04-17

00 04 23

24 02

00 00 83

00 13 31

23 12

05 03

06 83

00 12 85

02 62

11 39

00 01

00 21

00 27 98

00 03 57

09 21

00 05 48

04 30

00 04 12

00 04 37

03 16

00 08 30 1

00 21

00 65 54

00 03 08

21 34

54 91

00 31

00 7220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8. 1926

Taluka : SANGOLA

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 PACHEGAON

459 BUDRUK

460

467 (Conta:)

Nala in between Gat No 460 & 467 &V.B of Kombadwadi 2 KOMBADWADI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are

7 8

00 05 42

00 53 72

00 04 93

17 47

09 56 80

Total:

V.B Pachegaon

Nala adjacent to

00 04

Budruk & Gat No

266& 267

266

267

268

269

270

272

271

274

275

276

286 3

KOLE

2946

2947

2948

2949

2950

2951

2952

MDR - 78 in

00 00 10

07 32

00 04

00 06 13

06 91

16 42

06 52

17 63

00 14

00 25 93

28 72

01 39 03

Total:

14 46

00 48 43

00 04 64

00 11 28

00 19 62

00 24 24

00 26 79

00 04

between Gat No

2952& 2931

2931

2929

2926

2925

2924

00 20 32

00 07 42

19 55

00 03 45

05 07

00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7221

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : SANGOLA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 3

KOLE

2922

2921 (Conta.)

2918

2917

2916

2915

2914

2913

2910 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

10 50

00 17 21

00 14

00 12 34

00 07 29

00 07 25

00 05 43

00 01 92

00 21 10

00 09 97

Warar Devi Nala in

between Gat No

2910 & 2706

2706

2705

2704

2703

2702

00 06 31

00 04 91

00 06 13

07 07

00 81 62

00 02 74

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

2702& 1957

1957

40 96

Area in between

GatNo

1957 &1964

Area in between

Gat No

00 11 50

1957 &1964

Area in between

Gat No

11 11

1957 &1964

1964

1966

1967

14 32

00 07 01

00 20 92

Drain in Gat No

1967

00 00 83

00 02 22

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

1967 & 1794

1794

1793

1790

00 01 02

02 28

00 07 92 7222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

State : MAHARASHTRA Taluka : SANGOLA

District: SOLAPUR

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Nameofthe Village

7 8 3

KOLE

Nala in between

00 03 66

GatNo

(Contd.)

1790& 1789

00 14 69

1789

64 27

1782

15 35

1784

00 28 30

1787

00 44 08

1756

00 18 80

1753

00 04 82

1754

Area in between

00 07 20

GatNo

1754 & 1751

06 81

1751

00 04 35

1750

03 37

1749

06 54

1759

02 34

1748

09 00

1745

01 06

1747

00 04

1746

67 30

1704

00 02 32

Metalied Road in

between Gat No

1704 &1695

49 70

1695

1691

00 12 56

1693

00 63 76

00 22 82

1680

16 97

1681

28 61

1679

24 75

1678

MDR - 78 in

05 99

between Gat No

1678& 1676

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7223

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : SANGOLA

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 3

KOLE

Drain in between

GatNo (Contd .)

1678& 1676

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 04 83

Area in between

GatNo

1678& 1676

1676 4

JUNONI

Area in between

00 36 44

20 03 Total : 11

00 43 51

00 11 93

53 23

00 01 17

00 00 71

00 00 76

00 22 38

00 80 50

28 28

00 00 24

Gat No 34 & 31

132

135

134

133

142

143

00 30 30

00 20 50

00 03 21

01 35 84 3

00 15 21

00 40 72

00 09 76

00 20 87

00 01 23

00 17 51

00 01 65

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

143 & 145

00 00 22

00 04 73

Metalled Road in

GatNo 145

145

146

147

00 11 45

00 11 66

00 03 59 7224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka SANGOLA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No.

Sr. No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Name of the Village

7 8

00 05

150

JUNONI

00 10 28

151

(Contd .)

00 18 04

152

23 31

153

00 36 38

154

Nala in between

00 01 14

GatNo

154 & 205

46 99

205

00 05 22

206

00 04 60

207

03 49

208

06 85

209

22 72

210

215

216

217

16 75

218

219

288

13 78

289

32 83

290

20 14

295

04 21

331

23 13

300

00 05

301

Nala in between

GatNo

300& 329

00 24 58

329

31 57

326

44 84

Total:

18 43

111

KARANDEWADI

Metalled Road in

03 30

GatNo 111

110

00 21 83

Total:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7225

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Gat No.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

659 HATID

658

660

665

663

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

00 35 54

21 44

60 15

02 03

00 00 18

SH - 3 in Gat No

664

669

674

670

671

559

558

557

556

555

113

Area in between

GatNo

113 & 441

107

106

457

458

455

Area in between

GatNo

455& Nala

Nala near Gat No

358

359

366

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

366& 212

212

211

207

00 04 05

38 37

00 30 91

00 29 63

00 63 93

02 00

08 77

00 04 51

03 87

08 62

54 63

00 00 30

46 46

00 26 62

00 00 94

00 00 99

00 16 88

00 09 74

00 13 57

11 48

00 34 13

05 64

00 03 64

00 03 60

00 00 39

00 24 01 7226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : SANGOLA

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 6

HATID

205

204 (Contd .)

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 28 91

00 07 61

00 04 69

CartTrack in

between Gat No

204& 24

00 20 65

00 23 59

00 06 47

MDR - 62in

between Gat No

25& 56

10 52

00 30 45

00 15 39

Nala in between

00 09 30

Gat No 61 & 114

114

00 05 94

00 03 56

Area in between

Gat No 114 & 113

113

111

109

106

107

105

22 64

00 49

00 09 57

00 33 18

00 03 07

20 71

00 03 51

CartTrack in

between Gat No

105 & V.B of

Misalwadi

314 7

MISALWADI

315

09 10 69 Total:

00 27 43

00 55 00

20 62

Area in between

Gat No 315 & 197

197

198

199

200

201

00 09 45

00 03 26

00 02 15

00 02 59

03 11

00 7227

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Viliage

202 MISALWADI

195 (Contd.)

194

193

192

139

138

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Mectare

7 8

03 54

05 55

00 05

Area in between

Gat No 138 & 137

137

136

135

140

141

142

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

1139 UDHANWADI

1141

1143

1146

1150

1148

1151

1147

1104.ΤΟ 1117

1118 3139 G1 /04-18

14 51

00. 04

00 03. 41

03.

: 00

03 07

00 01

77 87

Total:

00 08

21 90

00 08 58

10 19

00 14 44

00 55 20

02 42 Total:

7228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka: SANGOLA

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

RAJURI

723

810

727

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt 5

6 7 8

97 37

00.

00 13 07

00 69 92

00 06 24

805 ΤΟ 809

00 10 11

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

805 to 809 & 729

729

730

736

13 23

00 34 68

00 51 16

00 03 95

Area in between

Gat No 736 & 739

734

735

737

732

736 to 738

00 10 29

00 02 08

00 18 70

00 10 15

00 12

Nala in between

00 06 42

Gat No 736 to 738

& 400 to 406

00 67 85

400 to 406

00 04 19

Metalled Road in

GatNo 375 to 399

11 41

375 to 399

309

318

313

315

316

317

325

326

327

328

331

329

332

17 41

00 14 39

00 08 52

00 10 68

00 10 00

00 06 08

06 18

00 05 79

12 08

12 69

05 46

00 03 39

00 00 08 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7229

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : SANGOLA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 9

RAJURI

1257

335 (cold.)

336

337

338

339

340

344

345

258

253

252

249

248

247

Metalled Road in between Gat No

247 & 225

225

226 10 WATAMBRE

626

624

623 11

NIJAMPUR

487

486

489

490

491

501

500

499

496

526

529

Metalled Road in between Gat No

529& 553 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

6 7 8

14 85

0007 72

00 06 38

00 01 96

00 02 39

00 17 52

00 06 54

00 00 12

00 64 75

00 12 98

00 11 03

00 14 47

00 10 63

00 05 26

00 08 73

00 0990

00 59 84

08 24 92 Total:

00 11 91

00 50 11

00 39 81

01 83

Total:

00 01 46

14 09

00 21 22

00 15 98

00 26 82

00 15 39

00 27 90

00 18 00

00 10 47

00 27 14

00 09 09

04 64

00 7230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

553 11

544 NIJAMPUR (Contd.)

543

541

540

533

538

537

534

623 12

AKOLA

619

618

604

605

602

588

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

7 8

14 29

11 54

00 14 53

00 02

00 02 69

02 32

00 01 56

06 47

09 06

00 16

81 94

Total:

00 69

17 99

00 13 40

18 32

00 44

Asphalted Road in

GatNo 588

00 05

Railway Line in

GatNo 588

587

579

589

590

577

576

575

525

527

528

522

521.

29 30

01 89

44 20

12 25

42 87

09 40

13 05

00 7231

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

520 AKOLA

519 (Could .)

516

513

512

511

Area in between Gat

No 511 & 467

467

466

465

464(P)

463

462(P)

461

460

457

455

452

451

436 KADLAS

437

439

440

441

442

447

448

449

455

456

454

459

457

458

602

601

598

594

599

597

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

02 66

08 71

00 33

04 92

00 06

00 10 55

00 04

00 07

00 01

00 45

Total:

07 39

08 66

00 01

00 00 30

06 27

00 7232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC, 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No..

Sr. No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

Nameof the Village

7 8 3

10 36

596

KADLAS

17 36

595 (P)

(Contd .)

00 06 80

Area in between

GatNo 595 & 554

07 71

583

84 84

Area in between

GatNo 595 & 554

00 01

554

41 02

555

00 02 82

Metalled Road in

GatNo 555

Area in between

00 00 32

GatNo

555& 660

00 10 08

660

08 91

661

26 25

666

04 81

665

00 48 34

672

00 47 46

714

36 34

733

14 89

735

01 15 99

809

SH - 71 in between

02 40

Gat No 809 & 860

19 50

860

02 01

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

860& 867

00 00 37

867

00 30 24

861

16 86

862

00 18 99

866 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7233

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : SANGOLA

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 13

KADLAS

865 (Contd.)

Metalled Road in between Gat No 865 & 884

884

885

890

889

888

927

900

926

925

924

923

922

921

920

919

914

915

Nala in between

GatNo 915 & 1183

1183

1182

1181

1180

Area in between

Gat No 1180 &

1208

Area in between

Gat No 1180 & 1208

Metalled Road in Gat No 1208

1208

1209

1210

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

17 37

00 02 66

00 21 09

00 17 11

00 15 92

00 19 26

00 21 22

06 93

00 04 82

00 08 06

00 05 63

00 06 92

00 01 96

00 04 68

06 28

00 07 22

00 12 47

00 02 19

00 15 89

00 06 89

00 18 58

00 16 91

00 05 22

00 05 64

43 59

22 67

00 03 17

00 22 29

00 16 58

00 10 89 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7234

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

1212 13

KADLAS

1213

1219 (Contd.)

1221

1230

1231

1234

1235

1236

1239

1240

1241

1242

1243

1257

1256

1255

1254

1253

1250

1251

1252

Korda River in between Gat No 1251 & V.B. of Medsingi MEDSINGI

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

12 85

00 06

47 67

00 09 17

26 51

00 48

09 78

85 60

Total:

00 09

Korda River in

between V.B. of

Kadlas & Gat No

291

Metalled Road in

04 57

GatNo 291

306

309

310

311

313

317

00 11

12 21

00 24

19 30

00 24 09 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

7235

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

318 MEDSINGI

328 (Contd.)

Aprupa Nadi in between Gat No

328& 375

375

374

373

372

Asphalted Road in between Gat No

372& 411

411

412

413

414

416

417

420

423

424

425

427

428

614 15 WADEGAON

613/1, 613/2

608

607

597 , 600 , 601 , 602

602

599 31.39 G1/04-19

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

B 5

00 38

00 15

00 08 36

34 65

00 11 54

00 19 65

00 07 74

00 03 79

00 09 63

00 06 90

00 16 20

17 97

00 10 86

10 86

00 44

27 32

26 37

00 11 17

1.2

00 07 53

82 37 Total: 05

00 21 19

00 40 51

00 15 19

00 22 86

00 14

00 18 50 7236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 2

15 WADEGAON

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 25 82

Area in between

GatNo 599 & 584

(Contd .)

584

583

584

582

581

578

568

567

566

564

00 07 98

00 07 02

00 09 84

17 39

00 50 11

06 32

00 07 06

00 09 81

00 06 32

03 17

Area in between

GatNo 564 & 447

Area in between

GatNo

00 04 95

564& 447

447

03 37

Area in between

GatNo

13 91

447& 556

556

555

13 91

07 56

Area in between

00 06

Gat No

555& 496

07 84

Area in between

GatNo

555 & 496

496

06 91

00 7237

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka : SANGOLA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Viliage

15 WADEGAON

(Contd.)

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

Area in between

GatNo

496& 501

Area in between GatNo

496& 501

Area in between GatNo 496& 501

501

506

SH - 3 in between GatNo 506 & 490

490

491

492

493

Area in between Gat No 493 & V.B. ofRajapur

88 16 RAJAPUR

Metalled Road in between Gat No

90& 84

00 02 05

05 85

0005 87

00 07 50

0004

00 10

36 96

Total:

36 61

00 49 99

02 05

48 94

00 25 28

00 7238

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

State: MAHARASHTRA Taluka: SANGOLA

District : SOLAPUR

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village

7 8

16 RAJAPUR)

00 57 25

00 59

03 59 38

Total:

[No. R-31015/19/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2726.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम . वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई-पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना (लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 7239

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

1100 लक्ष्मी दहिवडी

1101

1109

1102

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 01

00 59

00 32

गट नंबर 1102

और 1132 के बीच

की भूमि

1132

1131

1130

1245

1246

1247

1248

1249

1250

1251

1252

1254

1253

गट नंबर 1254 ,

112 और 108 के

28 06

00 03

00 30

00 04

00 71

00 18

00 09

62 86

00 02

00 08

00 06

बीच का मेटल्ड

रास्ता

112

108

107

106

105

231

100

234

251

252

260

00 06

00 35

00 28

00 51

00 25

00 55

17 48

00 30

00 7240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गद नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

257 1

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7 8 5

00 15

गट नंबर 257 से

लक्ष्मी दहिवडी (निरंतर)

279 के बीच का

00 03

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

280

279

278

277

276

274

273

271

313

314

317

316

428

429 2

112 आंधळगाव

113

00 10

14 58

00 25 47

00 15

00 03

00 80

00 56

00 46

00 00 18

00 35

कुल:

00 54

गट नंबर 113 और

112 के बीच का

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

114

115

118

130

131

00 39

00 25 94

00 33

00 72

गट नंबर 131 और

00 04 19

134 के बीच का

मैदन्छ रास्ता

134

136

00 28 98

00 7241

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

आंधळगाँव

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

6 7

गट नंबर 136 और

00 02

147 के बीच की

भूमि

147

00 02

गट नंबर 136,147

00 27

में मेटल्ड रास्ता

गट नंबर 150 में

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

150 सैलेवाडी

03 28

कुल:

00 13

00 88

00 09

00 08

00 02

00 01

00 18

00 27

00 01

00 48

00 37

गट नंबर 77 और

00 03

197 के बीच का

मेटल्ड रास्ता

197

196

195

193

191

190

189

187

186

185

184

167

00 15

00 04 42

00 08

00 10

00 09

00 10

00 15

00 25

00 21

00 05

00 12

00 41 7242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

उप-खण्ड सं

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

गट नंबर 167 और

सेलेवाडी

168 के बीच का

00 04 40

गाड़ी रास्ता

168

158

157

00 56 92

00 43 25

गट नंबर 157 में

उजनी दहिने तरफ

की कनाल

अकोले

88 कुल: 05 67

00 07

00 01

00 08

गट नंबर 12 और

13 के बीच में

खडकीरा नाला

00 10 02

गट नंबर 13 के

पास की भूमि

00 11

00 02 70

00 03 82

गट नंबर 16 और

00 01

17 के बीच की भूमि

00 05

00 04

00 03

गट नंबर 19 और

23 के बीच की भूमि

00 03

00 06

00 09 99

00 18 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

7243

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका: मंगळवेढा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गट नंबर

गाव का माम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

अकोले

43 (निरंतर)

उप-खण्ड सं

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7

8 5

0011

0018

0005 72

मट नंबर 43 और

252के बीच में

00 04

मेटल्ड रास्ता

गट नंबर 252 के

00 01 58

पास की कनाल

गट नंबर 252 और

68 18

115 के बीचकी

भूमि

गट नंबर 252 और

09 97

115के बीचकी

भूमि

142

185

00 29

00 69

गट नंबर 185 और

176के बीच की

भूमि

176

169

168

167

166

164

163

162

161

00 33

00 38 72

00 13

08 26

00 21

00 06

00 04

00 03

मट नंबर 161 और

00 06

160 के बीच

की भूमि

160

159

158

157

154

153

152 3139 G1/04-20

04 64

05 26

00 04

00 03

00 06 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 7244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र तालूका: मंगळवेढा

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

67 8

0003

अकोले

150

00 03 18

149

(मिरेतर)

00 04

148

00 04

147

00 01

116

05 64

48 मंगळवेढा

3874

00 36

3875

00 10

3876

00 32

3893

00 03

3892

00 27

3897

3899

00 26

3900

00 08

3902

00 44

3906

00 13

3927

3928

3930

00 04

3931

00 09

3932

00 19

3933

00 18

3934

00 14

3959

00 06

3960

00 16

3961

00 06

3962

00 05

3963

00 06

3964

00 07

3965

00 10

3968

3966

और

गट नंबर 3966

3958 के बीच का

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 15

3958

00 77

3970

और

गट नंबर 3970

00 06

3971 के बीच

की भूमि

00 03

3971 7245

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii)]

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाय का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

मंगळवेचा

3972

3973 (निरंतर )

3974

3975

3976

3977

3980

3981

3982

3984

3985

4112 उप-खण्ड सं

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

8 5;

6 7

05 37

00$

00006

0005

00 13

00 03

00 07

00 04

00 04 57

00 13 48

00 16 24

गट नंबर 4112 और

4113 के बीच का

00 04 89

राज्य मार्ग 141

4113

4117

4118

4119

4120

4121

4122

4123

4124

4127

4128

4136

4135

4134

4130

4133

4554

4555

4556

4562

4563

00 12

00 14 94

00 17

00 28 24

00 10

00 05

00 11

00 13

00 26

00 04

00 05

00 12 46

00 26 97

00 03

00 13 47

00 10 86 1

00 10

00 08

00 08 87 4

00 19 68

13 48

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

7246

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )] राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलम्पुर

तालूका: मंगळवेढा

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाय का नाम

कम सं.

मंगळवेढा

4564

4569 (निरंतर)

4570

4571

4572

4573 उप-खण्ड सं

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 09

00 07 96

00 18 52

00 16 13

00 02-

गट नंबर 4573 और

4575 के बीच का

00 04

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

4575

4611

4612

4613

4614

4618

4619

4620

4621

4622

4623

4624

4625

4627

4628 देवगाव

146

142

143

144

00 16

00 08 07

00 09

18 29

00 26 79

06 73

05 47

00 05 58

00 17

00 12

00 23

00 09 97

00 05 30

11 87

कुल:

00 30 03

00 29 47

00 02 51

00 11

00 20

00 01

.00 15

00 10

00 29

00 05 38

71 58

कुल:

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7247

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका: मंगळवेढा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 2

धरमगाँव

39 ढवळस

255

258

259

254

253

गट नंबर 253 में

सलंग्न कनाल

252

251

250

249

248

247

246

245

244

243

242

241

233

232

231

230

227

226

225

224

218

217

374 9

मुढवी

375

376

377

378

379

382

381

387

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

6 7 8 5

15 कुल:

00 16

00 01

00 26

00 04

00 12

00 12 45

00 05 72

00 06

00 09

00 15

00 07

00 08

00 05 90

00 12

00 02

00 09

00 08

00 01

00 02

00 03

00 04

00 06

00 04

कुल

00 00

00 06 93

14 29

00 09

00 10 98

00 16

00 33

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7248

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

388 9 मुढवी

389 (निरंतर)

392

393

394

395

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

00 16

00 13 66

00 11 82

गट नंबर 401 में

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

401

429

430

463

464

465

466

467

470

471

475

476

477

480

483

485

486

488

511

510

512

513

514

515

524

523

518

312

311

309

308

307

00 07

00 05

00 04

00 03

00 07 08

00 02 59

00 03

00 02

00 13

00 04

00 03

00 04

00 06

00 19

00 17

00 07

00 03

72 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7249

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : मंगळवेढा

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबरं

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 9

उप-खण्ड सं

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

7 8

गट नंबर 306 और

मुढवी

309 के बीच

(निरंतर)

की भूमि

गट नंबर 284 के पास

की भूमि

284

285

272

273

274

275

276

277

237

236

235

234

233

232

230

00 09

00 15

00 05 90

00 10

00 12

00 08

00 05

00 03

00 13

00 04

00 07 99

00 08

00 07

00 04 65

00 10

गट नंबर 230 और

162 के बीच का

अस्फालटेड सस्ता

162

163

164

165

178

174

172

171

170

169

168

167

166.:

119

118

117

00 23

00 07

00 27

00 18

00 25 79

09 31

00 10

00 06

00 11

00 06

00 09 21

00 13

00 10 37

00 26

00 10

08 17

कुल:

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 7250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : मंगळवेढा

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एथर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

6 7

02 उचेठाण

152

गट नंबर 152 में

01 93

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 21

183

184

00 36

185

गट नंबर 185 और

गाँव सीमा आंबेचिंचोली

00 28

के बीच में भिमा नदी

04 20 86

कुल:

[फा. सं. आर-31015 / 22/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 20th October, 2004

S. O. 2726. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described inthe Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority , Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum CorporationLtd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District , Maharashtra -412 201 7251

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka :MANGALVEDHA

Sr.

GatNo.

Survey No.

Name ofthe Village

1100 1 LAKSHMI DAHIVADI

1101

1109

1102

Area in between Gat No

1102& 1132

1132

1131

1130

1245

1246

1247

1248

1249

1250

1251

1252

1254

1253

Metalled Road in between Gat No

1254,112 &108

112

108

107

106

105

231

100

234

251

252

260 3139 G1/04-21

Are Sq.ret Sub-Division No

Hectare

8 5

32 88

28 06

00 27 63

00 02

08 21

06 49

00 05

51 30

25 20

55 61

00 17

27 86

00 7252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka :MANGALVEDHA

(PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 1

257 LAKSHMI DAHIVADI (Contd.)

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are

Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

15 72

00 03 13

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

257 & 279

280

279

278

277

276

274

273

271

313

314

317

316

428

429 2 ANDHALGAON

112

113

00 05 18

10 34

14 72

10 08

14 58

00 15

03 32

00 80 86

00 55

00 56 37

00 46 08

00 18

35 58

71 14 Total:

01 52

54 49

00 03 37

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

113 & 112

114

115

118

130

131

00 39 42

00 25 94

00 33 41

72 83

25 22

04 19

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

131& 134

134

136

28 98

00 29 71 7253

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : MANGALVEDHA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Viilage

4 1

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Area in between

2 ANDHALGAON (Total)

02: 58

02 86

Gat No

136& 147

147 Metalled Road in

Gat No

136, 147

03 08

Metalled Road in

Gat No 150

150

50 SHELEVADI

28 61 Total:

13 22

88 64

09 40

00 08 91

00 02

01 80

00 18

27 19

01 78

48 09

00 37

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

77 & 197

197

196

195

193

191

190

189

187

186

185

184

167

04 42

08 42

09 98

15 81

25 98

21 89

00 7254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka :MANGALVEDHA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

3 SHELEVADI

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

00 04

CartTrack in

between Gat No

(Contd .)

167 & 168

168

158

157 00 56 92

00 43 25

00 18 40

Ujani Right Bank

Canal in Gat No

157

10 4

AKOLE

12 05 67 88

Total:

07 23

01 42

08 86

07 02

Khadkira Nala in

between Gat No

12& 13

00 00

Area adjacent to

Gat No 13

16 00 11 32

02 70

00 03 82

Area in between

Gat No 16 & 17

05 24

04 37

00 03 37

00 02

Area in between

Gat No 19 & 23

00 03 27

06 07

00 09 99

18 53

00 7255

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka :MANGALVEDHA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

27 4

28 AKOLE (Contd .)

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

8 5

18 02

05 72

00 04

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

43& 252

01 58

Canal adjacent to

Gat No 252

68 18

Area in between

GatNo

252& 115

Area in between

00 09 97

Gat No

252& 115

142

185

00 29 05

00 69 78

Area in between

00 57

Gat No

185 & 176

176

169

168

167

166

164

163

162

161

00 34 63

00 33 91

00 38 72

13 75

00 21

06 03

00 04

00 03 14

06 98

Area in between

Gat No 161 & 160

160

159

158

167

154

153

152

00 08 76

04 64

00 05 26

00 15

00 04 89

03 89

00 06 57 7256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluka : MANGALVEDHA

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt Nameof the Village

Hectare

8 4

00 03 64

150

03 18

149

AKOLE (Contd .)

04 11

148

00 04 02

147

01 10

146

05 64 32

Total:

00 00 48 5 MANGALVEDHA

3874

36 11

3875

10 03

3876

32 94

3893

03 45

3892

00 27 86

3897

12 21

3899

26 67

3900

08 21

3902

44 64

3906

13 49

3927

00 09 56

3928

00 06 16

3930

00 04 93

3931

00 09 19

3932

00 19 87

3933

18 00

3934

3959

00 06 45

3960

16 81

3961

00 06 04

3962

00 05 66

3963

00 06 68

3964

07 77

3965

00 10 98

3968

17 72

3966

Metalled Road in

03 41

between Gat No

3966 & 3958

00 15 42

3958

77 34

3970

Area in between

00 06

GatNo 3970 &

3971

00 03

3971 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7257

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिकः 8,1926

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka :MANGALVEDHA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 2

3972 MANGALVEDHA

3973 (Contd.)

3974

3975

3976

3977

3980

3981

3982

3984

3985

4112

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 5

00 05 37

00 03 79

00 05 62

08 36

13 03

00 03 41

00 07 37

04 10

04 57

00 05 12

00 13 48

16 24

SH - 141 in

04 89

between Gat No

4112& 4113

4113

4117

4118

4119

4120

4121

4122

4123

4124

4127

4128

4136

4135

4134

4130

4133

4554

4555

4556

4562

4563

12 68

14 94

00 17 55

10 84

05 35

13 84

26 11

23 97

04 37

04 29

05 33

00 12 46

00 26 97

03 33

13 47

10 86

10 57 2

00 08

00 08 87 4

19 68

13 48

00 7258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka : MANGALVEDHA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

4564 5 MANGALVEDHA

4569 (Contd .)

4570

4571

4572

4573

Area

Sub- Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

8 5

06 39

09 16

07 96

00 18

16 13

02 62

00 04 50

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

4573 & 4575

4575

4611

4612

4613

4614

4618

4619

4620

4621

4622

4623

4624

4625

4627

4628

99 6

DEGAON

146

142

143

144

16 13

00 08 07

09 15

00 08 09

18 29

38 48

00 26 79

00 06 73

00 05 47

05 58

17 93

12 39

23 40

00 09 97

00 05 30

00 11

11 87 19 Total:

00 30 03

00 29 47

00 02 51

00 11 72

20 11

00 05 04

01 81

15 20

06 67

00 10 73

29 19

00 05 38

00 03 72

71 58

Total:

7259

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka :MANGALVEDHA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 2

39 DHARMGAON

255 8

DHAVLAS

258

259

254

253

Unlined Canal in

Gat No 253

252

251

250

249

248

247

246

245

244

243

242

241

233

232

231

230

227

226

225

224

218

217

374 9

MUDHVI

375

376

377

378

379

382

381

387 3139G1/04-22

Area

Sub- Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

8 5

00 15

00 00 15 Total:

00 16 31

01 50

00 10

26 01

00 04 58

12 09

12 45

05 72

06 58

09 41

00 15 46

07 81

08 98

05 90

02 42

00 00 03

00 09 47

08 94

01 76

01 96

03 54

04 32

06 67

04 44

36 00

39 18

Total:

00 69

06 93

00 09

00 10 98

00 43

16 36

33 37

00 7260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : MANGALVEDHA

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 9

MUDHVI

388

389 (Contd.)

392

393

394

395

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

8 5

00 03 92

00 16 43

00 13 66

04 13

00 11 82

35 89

Metalled Road in

Gat No 401

401

429

430

463

464

465

466

467

470

471

475

476

477

480

483

485

486

488

511

510

512

513

514

515

524

523

518

312

311

309

308

307

00 15 38

16 57

17 01

07 80

00 05 02

00 04 92

03 55

03 63

07 08

02 59

03 58

03 45

02 98

13 30

04 88

05 40

00 03 99

00 18

02 10

04 46

00 06 30

00 19 69

00 17 90

08 44

10 03

07 34

03 25

00 99

00 04

00 00 72 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7261

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka: MANGALVEDHA

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 9

Area

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

10 34

Area in between

Gat No 306 & 309

MUDHVI (Contd .)

00 09 41

Area adjacent to

Gat No 284

284

285

272

273

274

275

276

277

237

236

235

234

233

232

230

00 15 38

00 05 90

10 37

12 95

00 08 53

00 05 80

03 16

13 13

07 99

08 56

07 24

00 04 65

00 00 05

10 38

01 03

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

230& 162

162

163

164

165

178

174

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

119

118

117

00 23 50

07 07

11 65

27 61

00 18 72

25 79

00 09 31

10 42

06 53

11 36

00 12 03

09 21

13 27

10 37

26 87

00 10 25

00 38

17 28

Toral:

7262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II- SEC , 3 (ii) ] Taluka: MANGALVEDHA

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Nameof the Village

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8 10 UCHETHAN

03 32 02

152

01 93

Metalled Road in

GatNo 152

00 21 15

183

00 00 65

184

36 43

185

00 28 68

Bhima River in between Gat No 185 & V.B. Ambe Chincholi

04 20 86

Total:

[No. R-31015/22/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 20 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2727.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतरपाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम . वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना (लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , लोनी टर्मिनल, कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 7263.

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाय का नाम

क्रम सं.

एयर मीटर

वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

सरादा नाला के पास का

कोरेगाँव

कानाल

00 08 93

00 12 29

00 18

00 11 88

00 35

गट नंबर 11 में

00 02

मेटल्ड रोड

100

101

102

106

105

113

112

111

110

118

123

124

125

126

131

132

143

144

145

146

155

154

00 19

09 80

00 17

00 10

00 06

00 11

10 84

00 05

00 01

00 12

00 09

00 03 09

00 05

00 06

00 03

00 04

00 24

00 07

00 04

00 05

00 04

00 03 7264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]

जिला : सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : फलटण

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाद का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

कोरेगाँव

00 06 39

153

00 33 80

170

(निरंतर)

171

16 44

176

03 97

178

00 04

179

00 06 88

180

196

197

198

199

00 08 10

195

00 04 28

200

00 03

201

00 03

202

00 03

203

00 12

204

00 11

239

240

00 08

241

00 06

242

00 06

237

00 03 96

243

04 49 41

হল:

20 तरडगाँव

00 21

1498

00 59 24

1497

गट नंबर 1497 में

00 03 10

मेटल्ड रोड

गट नंबर 1497 और

गाँव सीमा चव्हानवाडी

के बीच का राज्य

मार्ग 70

00 41

1189

00 07

1184

00 18

1183

00 19

1182

00 10

1181 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7265

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

तरडगाँव

1179

1180 (निरंतर)

2243

गट नंबर 2243 और

1121 के बीच

की भूमि

1121

1119

1123

1120

1117

1116

1105

1104

1103

1102

1101

1100

1099

1098

1097

1095

गट नंबर 1095 और

933के बीच

का रास्ता

933

932

931

930

929

927

923

922

921

914

915

916

913 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

8 5

ब

00 19 25

00 26 61 ब

00 00 05

00 03 48

00 11

00 02

00 03

00 07

00 03

00 02 66

00 02

00 04 08

00 05

00 08 45

00 04

00 03

00 10 80

00 05

00 04

00 06

00 04

00 07

00 49

00 15

53 7266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii ) ]

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 5

गट नंबर 913 और

0003

552के बीच का रास्ता

तरडगाँव (निरंतर)

552

553

554

556

557

560

561

558

559

568

569

572

574

573

567

575

579

578

576

577

565

631

638

637

636

671

00 10 16

06 53

00 06 53

00 15

00 04

00 05 43

00 05

00 06

00 04 31

00 03

00 05 18

00 13

00 01

00 05

00 01

00 05

00 05 37

00 04

00 06

00 07

गट नंबर 636,671

और 647 में

नाला

647

670

668

666

00 04 47

00 06

00 01 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( H) 】

7267

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कर्म सं.

4 1

648

649 तरडगाव (निरंतर )

661

662

663

695

696

697

698

699

710

711

712

713

723

गट नंबर 710 , 713 ,

क्षेत्रफल

एयर मीटर

वर्ग हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 5

00 07 87

00 01 44

00 01

00 10

00 04

00 03

00 04

00 08 92

00 04

04 22

00 01 51

723 और 714 में

00 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

714

717

716

715

782

00 04 81

00 04 03

7.4

00 10

00 13 62

00 00

गट नंबर 715, और

00 22 90

426 के बीच में

अडुरकी माला

426

गट नंबर 426 में

00 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

423

100 चव्हाणवाडी

124

126

127 3139GI/04-23

07 92 75 कुल:

00 28

00 03

00 05 09

00 7268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 8, 1926

PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )]

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 3

128

136 चव्हाणवाडी (निरंतर )

137

138

139

140

396 सासवड

1168

1167

1166

1164

1163

1162

1205

1206

1207

1208

1211

1214

1210

1216

1215 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

00 11

00 03 15

00 03

00 02 46

00 02 30

00 16 91

00 04

81 31

कुल:

00 18

00 17

00 16

00 15 84

00 47 43

00 15

00 06

00 10

00 49

00 23 68

00 14 03

00 40

गट नंबर 1215 में

00 16 92

सरकारी भूमि

गाँव सीमा में नाला

1247

1249

1248

1250

1251

00 27 31

00 01 25

00 07 03

00 00 68

00 03 80

00 21

गाँव सीमा में नाला

1383

1296

00 13 14

00 13 26

00 02 69 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

7269

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : फलटण

जिला : सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 4

सासवड

1295

1294 (मिरेतर)

1293

1283

1282 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 08

00 00 14

00 02 63

00 21

00 22 55 क

गट नंबर 1282 और

1278 के बीच की भूमि

1278

1879

1878

00 25 56

00 11

गट नंबर 1878 और

2008 के बीच की प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 14

गट नंबर 1878 और

2008 के बीच गाडी

रास्ता

2008

2050

2013

2014

2015

2034

2020

2021

2023

2024

2025

00 04

00 05

00 01 58

00 03 83

00 03 94

00 01

00 02

00 04 22

00 07

00 05 35

00 01

00 02

गट नंबर 2025 और 1

00 03 85

के बीच मेटल्ड रास्ता

5& 6

7& 8

9& 10

00 06 09

06 85

05 29

गट नंबर 11 और 203

00 12 01 00 05 63 00 00 00

के बीच गाड़ी रास्ता

203

206

202

207

208

00 07

00 16 11 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7270

[PART II-SRC. 3 (ii )] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

210 4

सासवड

211

213 (निरंतर )

214

215

224

222

220

219

217

233

234

243

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 5

00 23 61

07 04

00 16 11

00 14 96

00 13 01

00 20

00 08

00 14

00 44

00 13

00 23

गट नंबर 243 और

00 00

242 के बीच मेटल्ड

रास्ता

गट नंबर 243 और

242 के बीच मेटल्ड

रास्ता

गट नंबर 243 और

00 18

242के बीच मेटल्ड

रास्ता

242

246

245

248 घाडगेवाडी

292 5

293

294

296

00 00 57

00 13 43

00 21

00 25

09 67

फूल:

00 24

00 70 27

00 53

00 07 20

गावठान की ओर गाँव

रहस्ता

285

284

283

282

280

277

278

345

344

342

340

328

04 12

13 50

07 8888 00 05

00 45

00 17

00 10

00 19

00 24 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7271

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर गाब का नाम

कम से.

4 2

गट नंबर 328 और घाडगेवाडी

329 के बीच की भूमि

329 (मिरतर)

गाँव सीमा बिबी के पास

का नाला

407

408

409

410

404

गट नंबर 404 के पास

का नाला

421

422

425

424

427

426

428

गट बंबर 428 और

431 के बीच

कीभूक्लि

431

434

453

गट नंबर 453 और

454के बीच अस्फालटेड

रास्ता

454 बिबी

807

809

गट नंबर 809 में

प्रमुख जिला

मार्ग नं.14

810

813

812

814

52 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप -अप सं.

6 7

8 5

00 06

00 01

00 07 90

00 05

00 04 16

00 02 09

00 02 23

00 30 68

00 10 84

00 15

00 10

00 01

00 07

00 03

00 09

00 07 41

00 04 22

00 04

04 28 52 कुल:

00 26 86

00 03

00 07 06

00 19 32

00 05 33

00 01 03

00 03 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

7272

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

बिबी

00 06

(निरंतर)

00 08 22

00 10

00 05

00 26

00 01

00 02

00 06

00 04

00 06

00 03 42

00 05

गट नंबर 23 और 87

के बीच का नाला

10 15

गट नंबर 87 और 15

के बीच का नाला

00 02 65

00 02 49

00 16 83

गट नंबर 13 और

00 02

128 के बीच

का नाला

128

गट नंबर 128 और

00 03

138 के बीच का रास्ता

00 08

138

00 01

139

01 18 80

116

गट नंबर 116 और

00 04 57

115 के बीच का

मेटल्ड रोह

00 46

115

72 85

फूल: 04 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7273

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

गाव का नाम

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

कम सं.

4 वडगाँव

188

176

185

184

147

149

150

151

152

गट नंबर 152 , 149

और गाँव सीमा वाघोशी के बीच का नाला 8

गाँव सीमा वाघोशी और

वाघोशी

गट नंबर 6 के बीच का

1 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

8 5

00 12

00 62 13

00 17 45

00 17

00 21

00 19 11

16 13

00 10

00 10 15

00 01

09 43

00 03

00 31

10 75

00 13

00 03

00 06

00 13

00 01

00 03 79 कुल: 04 01 57

00 04 26

00 10

00 11 38 7274

PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

8 2

11 86

00 25

वाधोशी (निरंतर )

00 06

गट नंबर 23 और

54 के बीच में मेटल्ड

00 02

रोड

00 25

00 00 52

00 15

00 21

00 05

112

125

06 81

113

114

00 09

115

00 05

116

00 06

117

00 13

118

119

00 10

161

00 23

162

00 26

183

00 14

185

00 05

179

00 17

186

00 06 45

187

00 04

188

00 08

189

00 08

190

00 04

191

00 05

192

00 02

193

00 04

194

00 08

195

00 08

196

कुल:

7275 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

(

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : फलटण

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

सं.

कम सं.

6 7

अ

00 50

747

ताथवडे

ब

747

00 98

746

00 01

745

00 02

744

00 26

743

00 29

742

00 48 54

741

00 47 09

740

00 56 17

739

कुल: 03 73 48

.[फा. सं. आर-31015/20/2004- ओ.आर- ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 20th October, 2004

S. O. 2727.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And whereas,it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai- Pune Pipeline Extension Project (from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District, Maharashtra -412 201

3139 GI/04-24 7276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-Sec. 3( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Taluka : PHALTAN

District : SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 1 KOREGAON

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 08 93

Canal adjacent to

Sarhadda Nala

20 00 14 81

12 29

00 18 22

00 11 88

00 35

Metalled Road in

00 02 09

Gat No 11

100

101

102

106

105

113

112

111

110

118

123

124

125

126

131

132

143

144

145

146

155

154 00 19 94

00 08 68

00 09 80

17 62

00 10 69

00 06 36

11 22

00 12 07

00 10 84

00 05 64

00 01 13

00 00 29

00 12 73

00 09 94

03 09

00 05 57

00 06 44

03 33

04 39

00 24 78

00 06 18

00 04 57

00 05 06

04 95

00 03 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7277

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka: PHALTAN

District: SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 1 KOREGAON

153

170 (Contd.)

171

176

178

179

180

196

197

198

199

195

200

201

202

203

204

239

240

241

242

237

243 2 TARADGAON

1498

1497 State: MAHARASHTRA Sub-Division

No. Hectare

Area Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 06 39

00 33. 80

00 00 20

00 16 44

00 03 97

04 49

00 06 88

07 65

00 01 58

00 02 03

00 01 58

00 04 28

00 03 38

00 03 60

00 12 15

11 70

00 07 65

00 08 10

00 06 53

03 96

04 49 41 Total:

00 21 20

59 24

Metalled Road in

00 03 10

GatNo 1497

SH - 70 in between

GatNo 1497 & V. B.

ofChauhanwadi

1189

1184

1183

1182

1181

05 95

00 41 77

00 07 41

18 24

00 19 04

10 59

00 7278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluka : PHALTAN

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt Nameof the Village

7 8

2 TARADGAON

19 25

1179

00 26 61

1180

(Contd.)

00 00 05

2243

Area in between

00 00 26

GatNo 2243 &

1121

00 03 48

1121

00 00 07

1119

00 00 55

1123

00 02 96

1120

00 11 89

1117

00 05 04

1116

00 07 19

1105

00 02 81

1104

00 03 94

1103

00 07 21

1102

00 03 76

1101

00 03 00

1100

00 02 66

1099

00 02 40

1098

00 04 08

1097

05 72

1095

00 03 26

Road in between

GatNo 1095 & 933

933

00 08 45

932

00 04 32

931

03 98

930

10 80

929

05 84

927

04 23

923

06 35

922

00 04 37

921

00 07 98

914

00 49 50

915

00 15 28

916

00 15 53

913 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7279

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : PHALTAN

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 2 TARADGAON

Sub-Division

No. Hectare

Area Are Sq.mt

21.

00 03

Road inbetween

Gat No 913 & 552

(Contd .)

552

553

554

556

557

560

561

558

559

568

569

572

574

573

567

575

579

578

576

577

565

631

638

637

636

671

Nala in Gat No

636, 671 & 647

647

670

668

666

10 16

06 53

00 06 53

00 15 41

00 08 47

00 04 28

00 00 10

00 05 43

05 96

00 06 83

04 31

00 70

00 03 72

00 42

13 44

00 01 53

05 06

01 21

05 29

00 05 37

00 04 78

00 06 25

07 03

07 29

00 56

00 04 47

00 03 77

00 06 30

00 01 10 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] 7280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : PHALTAN

District: SATARA

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village

07 87

648

2 TARADGAON

649

(Contd .)

00 01 03

661

00 47

662

10 04

663

04 92

695

00 03 96

696

00 03 92

697

00 04 10

698

00 00

699

00 08 92

710

00 04 62

711

00 04

712

00 01

713

00 00

723

02 75

Metalled Road in Gat No 710 , 713,

723 & 714.

00 04 81

714

00 04 03

717

00 10 74

716

13 62

715

00 00 08

782

22 90

Adur Ki Nala in

between Gat No

715 & 426

00 40 32

426

Metalled Road in

02 67

GatNo 426

423

92 75

Taml:

00 28 12

100

3 CHAUHANWADI

00 03 89

124

00 05

126

00 04 71

127 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

7281"

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka: PHALTAN

District : SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 3 CHAUHANWADI

128

136 (Contd.)

137

138

139

140

396 4

SASVAD

1168

1167

1166

1164

1163

1162

1205

1206

1207

1208

1211

1214

1210

1216

1215

Govt. Land in Gat

No 1215

Nala in V.B.

1247

1249

1248

1250

1251

Nala in V.B.

1383

1296 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt. 5

7 8

00 11 47

00 03 15

00 03 17

00 02 46

00 02 30

00 16 91

00 00 04

00 81 31 Total:

00 18 48

17 27

00 16 14

00 15 84

00 47 43

00 15 51

00 00 10

00 13 09

00 06 16

10 01

00 00 10

00 49 13

00 23 68

00 14 03

00 40 76

00 16 92

00 27 31

00 01 25

00 07 03

00 00 68

00 03 80

21 52

00 13 14

00 13 26

00 02 69 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 7282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : PHALTAN

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

1295

SASVAD

1294

(Contd .)

1293

1283

22 55

1282

Area in between Gat

00 34

No 1282 & 1278

25 56

1278

11 65

1879

00 00

1878

MDR14 in between

GatNo 1878 & 2008

CartTrack in between

GatNo 1878 & 2008

2008

2050

2013

2014

2015

2034

2020

2021

05. 35

2023

2024

02 01

2025

Metalled Road in

between Gat No 2025

& 1

12 01

05 63

5& 6

7& 8

9& 10

00 05

CartTrack in between

GatNo 11 & 203

203

22 76

206

202

207

208 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ⅱ ) ]

7283

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : PHALTAN

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Viliage

4 4

210

211 SASVAD (Contd .)

213

214

215

224

222

220

219

217

233

234

243

Area

Sub-Division

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

8 5

00 23 61

07 04

00 16 11

14 96

13 01

20 48

00 16 68

00 08 42

14 00

00 48

00 44 05

13 39

23 57

00 00 83

Metalled Road in

between Gat No 243

&242

00 00

Metalled Road in

between Gat No 243

& 242

Metalled Road in

between Gat No 243

& 242

242

246

245

248 5

292 GHADGEWADI

293

294

296

00 57

13 43

00 21 00

25 79

67 29

Total:

70 27

00 53

07 20

04 12

VillageRoadto

Gavthan

285

284

283

282

280

277

278

345

344

342

340-

328 3139 G1/04-25

00 21 82

00 04 50

00 13 50

00 05

00 16

00 05

17 34

00 13

00 10 88

00 19 19

00 24 35 7284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[ PART 11-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District: SATARA

Taluka : PHALTAN

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

No.

Nameofthe Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

Area in between

06 GHADGEWADI

GatNo 328 & 329

00 01 63 (Conta .)

329

Nala near V.B. of

00 07 90

Bibi

407

05 00

00 04 16

408

00 02 09

409

410

02 23

00 30 68

404

Nala adjacent to

00 03 51

GatNo. 404

10 84

421

422

00 15 47

10 56

425

424

07 52

427

00 07

426

00 07 93

428

Area in between

00 03 16

GatNo 428 & 431

00 09 38

431

07 41

434

453

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

453& 454

454

28 52

Total: 04

00 BIBI

807

00 26 86

809

MDR - 14 in Gat

00 03

No 809

00 07 06

810

00 19 32

813

00 05

812

00 01 03

814

00 00 08

03 60

52 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7285

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka: PHALTAN

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 6

BIBI

53 (Contd.)

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

8 5

00 06 17

00 06 96

00 08 22

10 11

14 83

00 00 10

26 96

01 80

00 02 34

00 06

00 04 14

00 06 12

00 03 42

00 05 40

Nala in between

00 03 46

GatNo 23 & 87

10 15

Nala in between

00 06 07

Gat No 87 & 15

00 02 65

00 02 49

16 83

Nala in between

00 02 65

Gat No 13 & 128

128

00 65 55

00 03 29

Road in between

GatNo 128 & 138

138

139

116

00 08 62

00 01 57

01 18 80

00 04 57

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

116 & 115

115

46 60

72 85

Total:

7286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

Taluka : PHALTAN

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District : SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

VADGAON

188

176

185

184

147

149

150

151

152 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

00 . 09 59

00 12 14

00 62 13

00 06 56

00 18 65

17 45

17 14

21 62

00 19 11

00 16 13

00 12 26

10 77

24 62

00 10 15

01 23

00 09 43

00 03 20

00 31 19

02 32

00 24 37

10 75

13 80

00 06 57

00 14 78

00 02 87

Nala in between

00 03 79

GatNo 152, 149 &

V.B ofWaghoshi

WAGHOSHI

04 01 57 Total:

00 04 26

Nala between V.B

ofWaghoshi &

GatNo 6

10 27

00 11 38 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

7287

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : PHALTAN

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 1

20 WAGHOSHI (Contd.)

Metalled Road in between Gat No 23 &54

112

125

113

114

115

110

117

118

119

161

162

183

185

179

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

Area

Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8 5

00 11 86

00 25 50

00 06 27

00 06

00 02 35

00 25 25

00 00 52

00 07 78

00 15 30

00 21 13

00 05 40

00 09 59

00 06 81

09 41

05 54

06 56

13 11

00 04 62

10 43

23 03

00 28 07

00 05 57

00 17 13

06 45

04 66

00 08 26

00 08 12

00 04 11

00 05 21

00 02 54

00 04 78

00 08

00 08 75

03 65 56 7288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Taluka : PHALTAN

District: SATARA

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Nameofthe Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

7 8 9 TATHAVADE

747

50 65

747

00 12

746

98 86

.00 01 55

745

744

00 02 31

743

26 02

742

00 29 93

741

48 54

00 47 09

740

00 56 17

739

Total: 03 73 48

[No. R -31015/20/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2728.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा ३ की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतर पोइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध मैं श्री. एम, वी, चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परिसौजला (लोली से पकनी तक हज़ारवाड़ी के रास्ते), हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरिशन लिमिटेड , लोनी हर्मिनल , क्कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव, हवेली तालुक्का, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 7289 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

अनुसूची

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : मोहोळ

जिला: सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

उप-खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

6 7 8

कोथाले

143

00 04

146

00 07 52

147

14 01

148

गट नंबर

148,147,146 और

00 00 69

143 के बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 37 80

149

150

00 11 53

151

00 30

152

गट नंबर 152 और

164के बीच

00 02

में सेवामार्ग

00 19

164

गट नंबर 164 और

165 के बीच

00 01

में रास्ता

00 13

165

00 11

166

00 07

167

00 01

168

00 05

169

00 12 54

170

00 07 60

171

00 06 55

172

00 06 50

173

00 03 33

174

गट नंबर

और

171,172,173

00 02

174 के बीच

में नाला

00 09 45

175

00 10 99

176

00 16

177

00 13

184

00 05

185 [ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ) 7290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIΚΑ 8 , 1926

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

तालूका : मोहोळ

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर उप-खण्ड सं.

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

00 01

187

00 06

186

कोथाले (निरंतर)

कुल:

गट नंबर 368,367

अंकोली

और गाँव सीमा के

00 02

कोथाले बीच में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 00 81

368

00 22

367

00 31

363

00 18

365

00 07

364

00 12

362

00 10

360

00 26

359

357

00 11

356

00 88

353

गट नंबर 353

00 03 19

में नाला

00 08

351

00 05

352

00 29

332

00 31

404

00 26 82

405

00 15

406

00 03

407

00 40 84

325

गट नंबर 325

04 91

में कनाल

गट नंबर 325 में

नाला

गट नंबर 325 और

02 25

324 के बीच में

गाडी रास्ता

324

00 08

323 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7291

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका: मोहोळ

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 2

उप-खण्ड सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7 8

गट नंबर 323 और

270 के बीच में

अंकोली (निरंतर)

ड्रेन

00 02

गट नंबर 323 और

270 के बीच में

00 02 34

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

270

271

00 20 56

00 47 34

272से 282

283

284

288

00 62 34

00 23 21

00 18 87

गट नंबर 288 और

104 के बीच में

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

104

105

109

101

110

111

112

115

860 कुरुल

861

862

859 3139 G1/04-26

00 12 49

14 80

00 08

00 06

00 18 36

00 03

00 20

00 11

00 48 60

00 13 20

00 13 82

00 33

00 13 48

00 26 55

00 72 01

09 91

कुल:

00 34 62

00 74

00 12

00 38 22 7292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

तालूका : मोहोळ

[PART 11-8EC. 3 (ii)] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 3

कुरुल

558

857 ( निरेतर )

845

844

क्षेत्रफल उप-खण्ड सं. हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7 8 5

00 11 10

00 55

2020

00 07

गट नंबर 844 और

843 के बीच में

00 08 64

गाडी रास्ता

843

842

889

888

887

00 26 64

00 12 24

00 07 92

00 06 34

00 43

गट नंबर 890 और

890 पै. मैं प्रसुख

जिला मार्ग 57

890पै

892

891

00 51

गट नंबर 891 और

949 के बीच मैं

00 14

गाड़ी दस्ता

940

947

00 73

गट नंबर 947 और

943 के बीच में

संलग्न कनाल

043

00 05

गर्ड नंबर 943 और

942 के बीच में

संलग्न कनाल

942

1082

1083

1084

1085

1088

1091 पै

1089

1090

18 40

00 00 45

00 04

00 12

00 21

00 06

00 10 84

00 00 61

00 32 [ भाग [ [= खक्छ 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका । माहाक

7293

जिला: सोलापुर

कम

माह का मान

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

4 उपखण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7

गढ़ नंबर 1090 और

21 के बीच में राज्य

(निरंतर)

00 03

मार्ग 149

00 21 20

00 05 24

गट नंबर 22 और 24

00 05

के बीच में नाला

00 23 93

00 49 88

00 61 93

00 07 05

गट नंबर 32 और

127 के बीच

00 12 89

की भूमि

127

126

123

122

120

119

137

140

138

139

116

115

142

141

00 03 84

00 50 24

00 32 47

00 17 81

00 15. 25

00 01

00 21 96

00 05

00 11 05

00 11 13

00 01 68

00. 15 37

00 09 02

गट नंबर 141 और

142के बीच में

00 03

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

144

148

151

150

149

00 41 92

00 49 95

00 20 39

00 48

12 31

कुल:

7294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIΚΑ 8 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तालूका : मोहोळ

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर उप-खण्ड सं

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

काटेवाडी

237

00 53 34

238

00 06

236

00 19 64

00 24

233

00 19 44

232

00 15 48

231

00 28

229

00 20 50

228

00 27

227

00 00 52

212

226

60 51

225

00 30

224

00 19

03 17

कुल:

385

00 01 84 विरवडे बुद्रूक

386

00 24

15 07

387

388

00 07 60

381

392

00 04

393

00 04

394

00 03

गट नंबर

388,381,392,393 ,

00 01 86

394,395 और 396

के बीच में मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 12 33

395

396

00 15 40

397

00 15

00 12 38

399

400

00 14 99

00 25 29

404

406

00 34 29

00 27 30

420

421

00 08

419

00 06

00 37 17

422

423

00 08

424

00 11 81 [भास II- खण्ड 3(ji ) ]

7295

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका : मोहोळ

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सोलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंतर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

425

426 विरवडे बुद्रूक ( जिरंतर )

427

442 उप-खण्ड सं .

वर्ग

हेक्टर एयर मीटर

00 08 36

00 13 41

00 27

00 06

गट नंबर 442 और

गाँव सीमा पोफली के

00 10 56

बीच में सिना नदी

पोफली

03 65 40

गह नंहार 151 और

गाँव सीमा विश्वहे बु.

00 14 37

केबीच में सिना नदी

151

150

144

148

147

145

143

142

141

138

140

139

135

134

133

131

127

117

00 19 02

00 19 51

00 19 44

11 76

00 14

00 16 42

00 15 84

00 01

00 02

00 53

00 12 90

00 49 99

00 54

00 14 52

00 22 03

गट नंबर 117,118

और 119 के बीच

में नाला

118

119

120

121

123

122

00 08 85

00 08 14

00 10 80

00 30

00 17 64

00 03 38

गट नंबर 123 और

122 के बीच की

00 04 67

जलबटवारा नलीका

7296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART I SBC.3( )) तालूका : मोहोळ

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : साबापुर

क्षेत्रफल

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

उप-अष्ठ सं.

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

6 7

पोफली

गट नंबर 122 और

98 में द. मध्य

00 07 95 (निरेतर)

रेल लाईन

00 23

कुल: 04 73

गट नंबर 28 और गाँव

विरखडे खुर्द

सीमा पोफली के बीच

00 02 81

में नाला

00 25 78

00 21 75

गट नंबर 29 में

00 01 50

जलबढ़वारा नलीका

00 10

01 07 70

यह नंबर 43 में प्रमुख

02 82

जलबटवारा नलीका

गट नंबर 43 में दरी

00 05 74

गट नंबर 35 में दरी

00 04 76

00 11.

00 01 10

00 07 45

00 08 22

00 25 10

00 14 30

00 16 79

00 10 63

00 10 57

गढ़ नंबर 92 में प्रमुख

00 02

जिला मार्ग 33

00 05 61

00 01 81

92 93

00 03 45

00 04

00 11 52

00 04

00 09

100

00 13

101

00 05

102 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत की राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

तालूका: मौहील

7297 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सौलापुर

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 7

103

104 विरवडे खुर्द (निरेतर)

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

114

112 उप-खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 5

6 7

00 04 95

00 07 01

00 05 83

00 07 83

00 06

00 07 39

00 05 14

00 07 34

00 04 92

00 34 67 कुल: 04 49 17 फा. सं . आर-31015/23/2004-ओ.आर-11 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 20th October, 2004

S. O. 2728.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipelineshould be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described inthe Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Rightof User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

OCTOBER 30, 2004 / KARTIKA 8, 1926

7298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

SCHEDULE

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : MOHOL

Area

Sub-Division

GatNo.

Sq.mt

Are

Survey No.

Hectare

No.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

00 00

143

KOTHALE

04 15

146

07 52

147

148

00 69

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

148, 147,146 and

143

37 80

149

150

11 53

151

30 53

152

Service Road in

between Gat No

152& 164

164

Road in between

Gat No

164& 165

165

166

167

168

169

12 54

170

171

06 55

172

06 50

173

03 33

174

Nala in between

02 06

GatNo

171,172,173 & 174

175

10 99

176

00 16 42

177

184

185 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7299

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : MOHOL

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 1

KOTHALE

187

186 2

ANKOLI

Sub-Division

No.

Area Are Sq.mt

Hectare

01 72

06 34

78 94

Total:

02 97

Metalled Road in

between V.B. &

GatNo 368,367

368

367

363

365

364

362

360

359

357

356

353

00 81

22 36

00 31 81

00 18 00

00 07 03

00 12 86

10 75

00 26 49

12 87

00 88 61

Nala in Gat

No 353

351

352

332

404

405

406

407

325

Canal in Gat

No 325

00 03 19

08 90

00 05 63

00 29 84

00 31 08

26 82

00 15 10

00 03 35

40 84

00 04 91

Nala in Gat

No 325

01 60

02 25

CartTrack in

between Gat No

325& 324

324

323 3139 G1/04-27

00 42 44

00 08 39 7300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[ PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] Taluka : MOHOL

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Area

Sub - Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

No. Hectare Are Sq.mt Nameof the Village

ANKOLI

Drain in between

02 13

GatNo

(Conta.)

323& 270

02 34

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

323 & 270

20 56

270

47 34

271

00 62 34

272 to 282

23 21

283

23 21

284

18 87

288

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

288& 104

12 49

104

14 80

105

00 08 48

109

101

00 06 97

110

18 36

111

03 40

112

00 20 21

115

48 60

13 20

13 82

33 21

13 48

00 00 46

26 55

00 05

72 01

91 70

Total:

34 62 KURUL

860

861

12 39

862

38 22

859 7301

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Taluka : MOHOL

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

KURUL

558

857 (Conta .)

845

844

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

11 10

00 36 96

55 20

00 07 20

08 64

CartTrack in

between Gat No

844& 843

843

842

889

888

887

00 26 64

12 24

00 07 92

06 34

43 38

05 76

MDR - 57 in

between Gat No

890 & 890 (P)

890 (P)

892

891

CartTrack in

00 51 84

00 20

36 11

between Gat No

891& 949

949

947

73 43

00 05

Unlined Canal in

between Gat No

947 & 943

943

00 05

07 52

Unlined Canal in

between Gat No

943 & 942

942

1082

1083

1084

1085

1088

1091( P)

1089

1090

18 40

00 00 45

04 84

00 12 18

00 21 30

06 07

10 84

00 61

00 32 67 7302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Taluka : MOHOL

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area Sr. No.

Survey No.

GatNo.

Name of the Village

Sub -Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are 1

7 8 3

SH - 149 in

between Gat No

03 61 KURUL (Contd.)

1090& 21

00 21 20

05 24

00 05 96

Nala in between

GatNo 22 & 24

00 23 93

00 49 88

00 61 93

07 05

Area in between

00 12 89

GatNo

32& 127

127

00 03 84

126

00 50 24

123

00 00 36

122

32 47

120

00 17 81

119

00 15 25

137

01 58

140

00 21 96

138

05 16

139

116

115

00 01 68

142

15 37

141

03 01

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

141 & 142

144.

00 41 92

148

00 49 95

151

00 20 39

150

00 48 42

149

Total:

31 74 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7303

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

Taluka : MOHOL

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

237 4

KATEVADI

238

236

233

232

231

229

228

227

212

226

225

224 5 VIRVADE BUDRUKH

385

386

387

388

381

392

393

394 Sub-Division

Area

No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

53 34

00 06

00 19 64

00 24 52

00 19 44

15 48

28 69

20 50

27 78

00 52

00 51 49

00 30 32

00 19 47

17 70 Total:

00 01 84

00 24 06

00 15 07

06 05

07 60

00 04 91

04 47

00 03 54

Metalled Road in

between GatNo

01 86

388,381,392,393 ,

394,395 & 396

395

396

397

399

400

404

406

420

421

419

422

423

424

00 12 33

00 15 40

15 45

00 12 38

00 14 99

34 29

27 30

00 08 61

00 06 96

08 43

00 11 7304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[ PART II -SEC . 3( ii)] Taluka : MOHOL

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA Name of the

Area

Sub -Division

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

No.

Village

Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

7 8 5 VIRVADE BUDRUKH

425

00 08 36

426

13 41

(Contd.)

427

00 27 02

442

06 24

10 56

Sina River in

between Gat No

442& V.B. of

Pophli

Total: 03 65 40 6

POPHLI

14 37

Sina River in between Gat No 151 & V.B. of Virvade Bk.

00 19 02

151

150

00 19 51

149

19 44

148

06 29

09 48

147

145

00 14 00

143

00 16

142

141

15 84

138

01 86

140

139

53 07

00 12 90

135

134

00 00 24

133

131

54 71

127

00 14 52

117

00 22 03

Nala in between

GatNo

117,118 & 119

00 08 85

118

119

00 10 80

120

00 30 24

121

123 7305

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SOLAPUR

Taluka : MOHOL

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

122 6

POPHLI (Contd .)

Sub -Division

Sq.mt

Area Are

Hectare

No.

00 04

Distributary in

between Gat No

123 & 122

(SCR) Railway Line in

between Gat No

122& 98

Total:

Nala in between

7 VIRVADE KHURD

V.B. ofPophli &

Gat No 28

21 75

Distributary in Gat

No 29

01 37

02 82

MajorLined

Distributary in

GatNo 43

05 74

Valley in Gat

No 43

Valley in Gat

No 35

11 15

MDR - 33 in Gat

No 92

02 95

05 61

01.

03 45

06 31

00 7306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] Taluka : MOHOL

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Sub -Division

Sr. No.

GatNo.

Survey No.

Nameof the Village

No. Hectare

Area Are Sq.mt 1

7 8 7 VIRVADE KHURD

11 52

(Contd.)

00 04 33

00 04 23

100

00 09 94

101

13 13

102

05 20

103

00 04 95

104

00 07 01

105

00 05 83

106

07 83

107

06 74

108

07 39

109

00 04 36

110

00 05 14

111

07 34

114

00 04 92

112

00 34 67

Total: 04 49 17

[No. R-31015/23/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ . 2729.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए; हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत उस होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए; उक्त पाइपलाइन अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधि। सूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार कर्को अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री आर. वी. सरवैया , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , करने पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, जिमखाना बिल्डिंग , आदिपुर रोड , अब्जार , कच्छ को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । हिन्दुस्तान 370110 (गुजरात)

7307

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य: गुजरात

जिलाः बनासकांठा

तालुका : दीसा

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

139 1. समोव नानावास

176

187

185

186+188

201

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 201 /2P3 और

245/P2 के बीच मे

245

244

247

248

249

314+315+316+317

313

310

335+359

नहर खसरा संख्या 335+ 359/1P1 मे

335+359

365+ 366

445+446

नहर खसरा संख्या 445+ 446/ 1P1

और 445+446/1P2 के बीच मे

445+446

443

442

441

440 3139 GI/04-28

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग

एयर

हेक्टेयर

उप खण्ड सं.

मीटर

23 00

2P2

2P3

06 05

22 09

1P3

1P1

1P2

78 39

1P1

1P2

1P3

2P1

2P3

2P2

P1 7308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

जिला: बनासकांठा

तालूका : दीसा

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

समोव नानावास

438

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 438/1 और

(जारी .... )

समोव मोटावास ग्रम सीमा के बीच

समोव मोटावास

803

802

801

800

761

नहर खसरा संख्या 761/ P2 मे

759

762

763

758

764

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 764/1 और

सावीथाना ग्राम सीमा के बीच मे

3. सादीयाना

383

385

386+387+ 388 + 389 +391

नहर खसरा संख्या

386+387-388-389+391 मे

386+387+388 + 389 +391

369

368

366

367

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 367 और

343/P1 के बीच मे

343

344

350

356

रास्ता खसरा संख्या 356/P3 और

वेलवापूरा गाम सीमा के बीच मे

कारीक

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

उप,खण्ड सं. हेक्टेयर एयर

वर्ग मीटर

29 58

02 85

00 59

13 54

07 84

08 20

16 39

02 85

03 26

09 62

11 40

00 99

01 44

0 29 93

19 95

01 88

14 27

09 26

07 12

P11

28 51

22 00

00 20

22 80

04 27

04 02

29 22

62 72

39 91

03 56 7309

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : गुजरात

जिला: बनासकांठा

तालूका : दीसा

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

502 4. वेलवापूरा

501

500

499

500

487

488

489

490

473

468

469

470

466

नहर खसरा संख्या 466/P2 मे

465

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग

एयर

हेक्टेयर

उप खण्ड सं.

मीटर

33 15

07 12

07 84

[फा. सं. र -31015/18/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st October, 2004

S.O. 2729. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of petroleum product from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi a pipeline should be laid by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited .

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Anypersoninterested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the Gazette of india containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the aquisition of the right of user therein for laying ofthe pipeline under the land to Shri R. V. Sarvaiya Competent Authority: Mundra - Delhi petroleum product pipeline Hindustan Petroleum Corporation ILimited . Gymkhana Building , Adipur Road , Anjar, Kutch, Pin - 370110(Gujarat) .

7310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

SCHEDULE

Taluk : DEESA

District : BANASKANTHA

Name of Village

Survey no .

1. SAMOU NANAWAS

139

176

187

185

State : GUJARAT

Area

Hectare Are :

Sub- Division No.

Square Metre

00 20

13 54

26 34

186+188

201

201 0

00 39

2P2

2P3

12 11

Carttrack in between Survey

No.201 /2P3 and 245/P2

245

244

247

248

249

314+315+ 316+317-

313

310

13 18

12 11

06 05

22 09

01 09

21 36

1P3

335+359

36 86

335+359

1P1

Canal in Survey

No( 335 + 359 )/1P1

335+359

1P2

365+ 366

445+446

Canal in between Survey No. (445 + 446/1P1 ) and (445+446/1P2)

1P1

16 39

14 25

445+446

1P2

10 69

445+446

443

442

441

440 1P3

09 72

2P1

2P3

13 64

2P2

22 80

28 51

P1 7311

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State:GUJARAT

District : BANASKANTHA

Tok : DEESA

Survey no. Name of Village

438 SAMOU NANAWAS

(Contd..)

Carttrack in between Survey Number.438/1 and village boundry of Samou Motawas

803 2. SAMOU MOTAWAS

802

801

80C

761

Area

Are

Hectare

Square Metre Sub- Division No.

29 58

07 84

Canal in Survey No 761 /P2

759

762

763

758

764

Carttrack in Between Survey

No.764/1 and Village boundry

ofSaviyana

383 3. SAVIYANA

385

386+387+388+ 389+391

Canal in Survey No

386+387+388+389+ 391

386+387+388 + 389+391

369

368

366

367

P11

Carttrack in between Survey

Number.367 and 343 /P1

343

344

350

356

Cart track in between Survey Number356/P3 and Village boundry of Velavapura

29 22

62 72

0 7312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)) Taluk: DEESA

District : BANASKANTHA

State : GUJARAT

Area

Name of Village

Surveyno.

Hectare Are

Sub- Division No.

Square Metre 4. VELAVAPURA

502

03 75

501

P2.

33 15

501

02 46

501

06 78

500

19 06

499

00 50

500

12 50

487

07 12

488

07 84

489

07 20

490

08 19

473

15 68

468

03 87

469

17 35

470

07 35

466

17 52

Canal in Survey No 466/P2

465

02 74

[No. R-31015/18/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 अक्तूबर, 2004

A का. आ. 2730.-केन्द्रीय सरकाररकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में सेमकोर से श्रीराम फट्रीलाइजर पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से पेट्रोलियम गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हूए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री अन्तर सिंह नेहरा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल (इण्डिया) लिमिटेड, सी -6, 107 , कमल अपार्टमेन्ट, सवाई जयसिंह एन.एच. , बनी पार्क, जयपुर , राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आपेक्ष भेज सकेगा । 7313 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

खसरा न

ग्राम

जिला

तहसील

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल ( हेक्टर्स में. )

0.2760

नया नोहरा

कोटा

लाडपुरा

0.7320

0.0720

1.0800

योग

0.1300

राजनगर

कोटा

लाडपुरा

0.1800

159/534

0.0240

160

0.0600

161

0.1320

165

0.1440

166

0.1320

167

0.0480

144

0.0540

168

0.0240

229

0.4680

320

0.1740

318

0.1560

315

0.1200

310

0.0360

311

0.0840

305

0.0240

306

307

0.2880

0.0440

357

0.4920

400

0.0960

398

0.0240

399

0.0960

389

0.0780

453

0.4860

452

451

0.0320

0.0460

450

0.0240

458

466

0.0300

0.7860

469

0.0720

468

4.5840

योग 7314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIΚΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] जिला

तहसील

खसरा न

ग्राम

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल ( हेक्टर्स में. ) कोटा

0.3720 लाडपुरा

सुखपुरा

0.0360

0.1080

0.1680

0.1800

0.0240

1.0920

0.0210

0.0240

0.0210

0.0840

0.0380

68.

0.0380

0.1560

योग

2.4000

कोटा

312

0.6980

लाडपुरा

रायपुरा

311

0.0100

313

0.0290

314

0.0250

409

0.0420

योग

0.8040

कोटा

174

0.4500

धाकड़खेडी

लाडपुरा

173

0.0120

172

0.2160

170

0.1250

171

0.2140

168

0.0330

167

0.1680

166

0.0600

165

0.0080

164

0.0220

161

0.0240

160

0.0380

134

0.1200

135

0.1560

156

0.0100

153

0.2040

155

0.0480 7315 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

खसरा न

ग्राम

तहसील

जला

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के ि क्षेत्रफल ( हेक्टर्स में.)

0.0600

154

धाकड़खेडी

0.0200

149

0.0040

140/1016

0.2650

144

0.0220

147

0.0100

143

0.0030

142

2.2920

योग

0.0040

79/656

उम्मेदगंज

कोटा

लाडपुरा

122

0.4880

87/584

79/587

0.5760

0.0420

0.0240

0.6840

114

0.0120

115

0.0180

117

0.0660

0.1920

0.0840

0.0240

0.1140

2.3520

योग

0.1200

321

देवली अरब

कोटा

लाडपुरा

0.1080

324

0.0480

401

0.4740

412

0.0540

414

0.0070

411

0.2700

415

0.0240

416

0.0360

427

0.0480

489

0.3420

490

0.0420

487

0.0780

477

0.1380

475

3139 GI/04-29 7316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

सर्वे न.

गॉव

तहसील

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हैक्टेयर में ) जिला

476

0.0120

देवली अराय

लाडपुरा

कोटा

474

0.0120

473

0.0180

0.0250

470

0.0240

469

0.0780

463

0.0060

462

0.0040

461

0.0900

464

460

0.0060

465

0.0840

2.1480

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/9/2004-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मंडल , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th October, 2004

S. O. 2730. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum gas through Samcore to Sriram Fertilizer pipeline project in the State of Rajasthan , a pipeline should be laid by the GAIL ( India) Limited;

And , whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty- one- days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Sh .Antar Singh Nehra, Competent Authority, GAIL ( India ) Limited, C-6,107 , Kamal Apartment , Sawai Jai Singh N.H. ,Banipark , Jaipur , Rajasthan.

7317 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

SurveyNo.

Tehsil

Village

Land tobe Acquired for R.O.U in Hectares District

0.2760

NayaNohara

Kota

Ladpura

0.7320

0.0720

1.0800

TOTAL

0.1300

Rajnagar

Ladpura

Kota

0.1800

159/534

0.0240

160

0.0600

161

0.1320

165

0.1440

166

0.1320

167

0.0480

144

0.0540

168

0.0240

229

0.4680

320

0.1740

318

0.1560

315

0.1200

310

0.0360

311

0.0840

305

0.0240

306

0.2880

307

0.0440

357

0.4920

400

0.0960

398

0.0240

399

0.0960

389

0.0780

453

0.4860

452

0.0320

451

0.0460

450

0.0240

456

0.0300

466

0.7860

469

0.0720

468

4.5840

TOTAL 7318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II -SFC, 3( ii )] District

Tehsil

Village

SurveyNo.

Land tobe Acquired for R.O.U in Hectares Kota

0.3720

Sukhpura

Ladpura

0.0360

0.1080

0.1680

0.1800

0.0240

1.0920

0.0210

0.0240

0.0210

0.0840

0.0380

0.1560

TOTAL

2.4000 Kota

312

Ladpura

0.6980

Raipura

311

0.0100

313

0.0290

314

0.0250

409

0.0420

TOTAL

0.8040 Kota

Dhakar kheri

174

Ladpura

0.4500

173

0.0120

172

0.2160

170

0.1250

171

0.2140

168

0.0330

167

0.1680

166

0.0600

165

0.0080

164

0.0220

161

0.0240

160

0.0380

134

0.1200

135

0.1560

156

0.0100

153

0.2040

155

0.0480

154

0.0600

149

0.0200

140/1016

0.0040

144

0.2650 7319

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Survey No.

Tehsil

Village

District

Land to be Acquired for . R.O.U in Hectares

0.0220

147

Dhakar kheri

0.0100

143

0.0030

142

2.2920

TOTAL

0.0040

79/656

Ummedgang

Ladpura

Kota

122

0.4880

87/584

79/587

0.5760

0.0420

0.0240

0.6840

114

0.0120

115

0.0180

117

0.0660

0.1920

0.0840

0.0240

0.1140

2.3520

TOTAL

0.1200

321

Dewali Arab

Ladpura

Kota

0.1080

324

0.0480

401

0.4740

412

0.0540

414

0.0070

411

0.2700

415

0.0240

416

0.0360

427

0.0480

489

0.3420

490

0.0420

487

0.0780

477

0.1380

475

0.0120

476

0.0120

474

0.0180

473

0.02.50

470

0.0240

469

0.0780

463

462

0.0060 0.0040

461

0.0900

464 7320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ) DISTRICT

TEHSIL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO .

AREA TO BE ACQUIRED FOR ROU (IN HECTARE) Kota

460

0.0060

Dewali Arab

Ladpura

465

0.0840

Total

2.1480

[No. L-14014/9/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 26 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2731.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम . वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते), हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , लोनी - टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 7321

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिल्हा : सोलापुर

तालूका : उ. सोलापुर

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं .

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

गट नंबर 53 और

पकणी

गाँव सीमा विरखडे

00 40

खुर्द के बीच में

गाडी रास्ता

00 26

07 12

00 16

00 00 13

गट नंबर 57 और

32के बीच में

नंनज नाला

00 10

00 27

00 00

00 29

00 20

गट नंबर 45 और

04 57

102के बीच

की भूमि

00 11

102

00 08

103

00 03

104

106

00 34

108

107

133

गट नंबर 133 और

134 के बीच

की भूमि

134

00 04

135 7322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तालूका : उ. सोलापुर

जिल्हा : सोलापुर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर 2

8 1

पकणी

136

00 16 04

137

(निरंतर)

गट नंबर 137 और

153 के बीच

की भूमि

141

142

00 02

153

00 11

144

145

00 10

146

00 17

157

00 20

158

00 14

162

गट नंबर 162 के

बीच में अस्फालटेड

02 55

रास्ता

00 01

268

योग 04 40

[फा. सं. आर-31015 /33/2004-ओ.आर- ।॥ ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 26tinOctober, 2004

S. O. 2731.- Whereas ,it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni vía Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described inthe Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Rightof User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7323

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writingto the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the landto Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project (from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village, Haveli Taluka , Pune District , Maharashtra -412 201

SCHEDULE

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SOLAPUR

Taluka : N. SOLAPUR

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

4 1

PAKNI

Area

Sub-Division

Sq.mt No. Hectare Are

6 7 8 5

00 00 40

CartTrack in

between V.B. of

Virvade Khurd &

GatNo 53

00 26 82

06 48

07 12

00 08 79

00 16 02

00 00 13

11 36

Nannaj Nala in

Gat No

57 & 32

10 32

00 27 70

20 66

15 63

00 00 37

00 63

29 33

20 06

00 04 57

Area in between

GatNo

45& 102

102

103

104

106 2:39 G1/04-30

11 43

03 30

00 06 25 7324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . (ii ) ] Taluka : N. SOLAPUR

District : SOLAPUR

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Sub-Division No.

Name of the Village

Hentáre Are Sq.mt 1

6 7 8 1

108

00 34 08

107

PAKNI (Contd.)

00 09 78

133

00 09 01

00 04 46

Area in between

GatNo

133& 134

134

00 09 65

135

00 04 40

136

00 07 85

137

00 16 04

00 06 74

Area in between

GatNo

137 & 153

141

00 00 51

142

00 02 36

153

00 00 93

144

00 11 45

145

00 21 07

146

00 10 14

157

00 17 02

158

00 20 59

162

00 14 55

00 02 55

Asphalted Road in

Gat No 162

268

00 01 31

04 40 59

Total

[No. R-31015/33/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 26 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ. 2732.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्गत प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

7325

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री . एम. वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई-पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते), हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , लोनी - टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412 201 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : सांगली

तालूका : कवठे महांकाळ

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर गाव का नाम

कम सं.

4 1

तिसंगी

461 1

470

468

469

471

482

483

484

489

490

492

493

494

502

501 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

सं.

6 7

00 12

00 10

00 32

00 23

00 22

00 21

00 43

00 23

00 26

00 02

गट नंबर 501 और

502 के बीच का रास्ता

500

645

646

647

648

649 ब

05 02 16 25 12

29 59 30 33 15 19

00 00 00 00 00 7326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तालूका : कवठे महांकाळ

जिला : सांगली

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 1

तिसंगी

673

00 28 08

672

00 12

674

00 04

670

00 24

669

00 03 96

678

00 02

668

00 20

667

00 07

665

666

00 12

679

योग

घाटनांद्रे

00 17

00 00

100

00 11

00 08

00 18

00 05

00 02

00 01

00 26 09

00 09 95

182

00 10

181

00 00

179

00 09

183

00 20

193

00 06

192

191

00 19

246

247

250

00 12

248

251

00 07

254

263

00 02

262

00 04

261

00 07

260

00 03

02 7327

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

तालूका : कवठे महांकाळ

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

258 2 घाटनांद्रे (निरेहर)

257

284

282

285 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

सं.

61 00 02

00 06 83

28 00 06

00 06

51 00 00

गट नंबर 285 और 592

02 99 00

के बीच का नाला

592

598

595

594

593

589

588

587

586

585

02 55 00

00 04

00 10

00 02

गट नंबर 585 और

578 के बीच का नाला

578

गट नंबर 578 और

817 के बीच का

राज्य मार्ग 78

817

818

819

821

822

823

00 31

00 22

00 42

00 44

गट नंबर 823 के बीच

का रास्ता

824

02 05

00 33

योग

[फा. सं. आर-31015/30/ 2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 7328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIΚΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 26th October, 2004

S. O. 2732. Whereas ,it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petrcieum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessaryto acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declaresits intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right on use therein for laying of the pipeline under the landto Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project (from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka, Pune District, Maharashtra -412 201

SCHEDULE

Taluka: KAVTHE MAHANKAL

District : SANGLI

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Gat No.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Viiiage

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.m t 1

7 8 1

TISANGI

461

00 19 34

470

00 20 69

468

00 00 15

469

00 12 35

471

00 10 11

482

00 32 86

483

00 23 54

484

00 22 77

489

00 21 49 7329

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,197

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

4 2

490 1

TISANGI

492

493

494

502

501

00 43 98

07 12

-00

00 23 55

00 35 24

26 91

02 32

Road in between

00 02 28

GatNo. 502 & 501

500

645

646

64.

648

649

673

672

674

670

669

678

668

667

665

666

679

79 2 GHATNANDRE

100

182

181

179

183

193

192

191

246

247

250

248

00 05 29 B

00 02 59

16 30

00 33

00 25 15

1219

00 28 08

1266

04 83

00 24 54

03 96

02 46

20 16

07 87

00 00 26

1231

00 10

83 78

Total

17 50

00 07

11 32

00 08 27

18 27

-00

05 00

02 27

01 21

26 09

09 95

10 20

00 08

09 37

00 20 28

06 03

00 00

19 27

00 74

00 08

00 98

00 7330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KAVTHE MAHANKAL

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

District : SANGLI

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2 GHATNANDRE

251

254

263 (Contd)

262

261

260

258

257

284

282

285 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.m t

7 8

00 07 92

00 09 30

00 02 27

00 04 86

00 07 62

00 03 02

00 02 61

00 06 83

00 06 28

00 06 20

00 00 51

00 02 99

Nala in between

GatNo 285 & 592

592

598

595

594

593

589

588

587

586

585

00 02 55

00 00 02

00 04 20

00 05 59

00 10 27

00 05 61

00 07 08

00 10 17

00 10 02

00 02 72

Stream in between

00 04 42

GatNo. 585 & 578

578

00 4174

00 03 26

SH - 78 in between

GatNo 578 & 817

817

818

819

821

822

823

00 17 33

00 31 50

00 2244

00 4213

00 44 77

00 5286

Road in between

00 02 05

GatNo. 823

824

00 33 48

05 94 79

Total

[No. R-31015/30/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

7331 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 27 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2733.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइनं बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम. वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी - टर्मिनल , कदमवाक 412 201 को लिखित रुप में वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका, पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खंडाला

क्षेत्रफल

उप -खण्ड

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

सं.

कम सं.

गट नंबर 530 में

पिंपरे बु.

20 51

निरा नदी

00 11

531

22 05

529

07 08

527

00 07

526

02 90

525

00 02

524

3139 G1/04-31 7332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 / KARTIKA 8, 1926 .

तालूका : खंडाला

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

जिला : सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 1

523 पिंपरे बु

(जारी)

522

521

520

519 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 02 49

00 07 63

00 07 67

00 07 06

00 10 74

गट नंबर 519 और

गाँव सीमा पिंपरे बु. के

00 19 68

बीच में दहिने और की

निरा कनाल

बावकळवाडी

गाँव सीमा पिंपरे बु.

01 29

26 योग

और बावकळवाडी के

00 02 80

बीच की भूमि

473

472

471

470

469

468

547

549

548

498

499

500

546

545

544

543

542

541

540 00 03 02 00 03 44 00 02 74 00 04 78 00 04 97 00 02 14 00 17 73

62 00 02

99 00 02

00 04 21 00 28 20 00

00 03 46 00 02

21 00 03

86 00 08

गट नंबर 539 मे

00 03

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

538

537

531

532

529 00 06 29 00 04 96 00 21 21 00 09 69 00 07

गट नंबर 529 और

62के बीच में

अस्पालटेड रस्ता

74 00 03 46 00 04 65 00 08 05

04 00 11 7333

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खंडाला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

73 2 बावकळवाडी

124

68 (जारी)

125

123

128

129

130

132

133

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

278

149

150

208

225

226

227

87 3 मरीआईची वाडी

194

113

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर

उप -खण्ड सं.

8 5

15 90

10 18

02 11

00 02

00 01

00 04

03 05

00 05

00 09

00 22

00 04

00 05 05

00 11

00 07 36

03 58 21 योग

00 16 58

00 06 21

00 03 81

09 15

00 09

00 08 88

00 12

00 08 05

00 16 85

00 03 56

00 53

गट नंबर 113 में

00 01

मेटल्ड रस्ता

117

118

119

00 35

00 17 35 7334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका खंडाला

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

जिला : सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 3 मरीआईची वाडी

गट नंबर 175 में राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

उप -खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7 8

00 03 81

गाडी रास्ता

(जारी)

175

172

171

169

00 23 43

00 08 00

00 07 91

00 19

गट नंबर 169 और

167 के बीच में मेटल्ड

स्ता

180

167

168

00 02 35

00 03 85

00 14 71

20 42

गट नंबर 168 और

160 के बीच में मेटल्ड

रहस्ता

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

गाँव सीमा

00 04 88

00 00 33

00 02 37

00 17 70 00 08 18

00 05 07

00 08 71

00 38 87

मरीआईचीवाडी के पास

का नाला लोणंद

गाँव सीमा मरीआईची

वाडी और सर्वे नंबर

321 के बीच में नाला

321

322

323

सर्वे नंबर 323 और

गाँव सीमा बाकुपाटलाची

वाडी के बीच में

नदीपुडी नाला

326

329

सर्वे नंबर 329 में

मेटल्ड रोड

00 08

04 21 77 योग

00 12 96

00 42 48

00 10 08

00 41

00 10 80

00 13 68 00 51 84

00 02 88 7335

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खडाला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

कम सं.

लोणंद (जारी)

सर्वे नंबर 329 और 328के बीच में रेलवेलाइन

328

सर्वे नंबर 328 और

344 के बीच में राज्य मार्ग 68

341

334

337

338

339

340

345

346

347

सर्वे नंबर 347 और

गाँव सीमा कोरेगाँव के

बीच में नाला

क्षेत्रफल

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

00 02 88

32 00 04

36 72 00

10 80

00 09 22

00 32 40

00 30

00 07 49

योग

गाँव सीमा लोणंद और

5 बाळूपाटलाची वाडी

बाळूपाटलाची वाडी के

बीच में

नदीपुडी नाला

166

167

165

158

157

160

00 01

15 97

00 12 68

06 99

47 60

योग

[फा. सं. आर-31015/ 31/2004- ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 7336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 2 h October , 2004

S. O. 2733. Whereas, it appearsto the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Rightof User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project ( from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka , Pune District, Maharashtra - 412 201

SCHEDULE

Taluka : KHANDALA

District : SATARA

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Nameof the Village

No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

Nira River in Gat

1 PIMPRE BK.

00 20 51

No. 530

531

00 11 96

529

00 22 05

527

00 07 08

526

00 07 44

525

00 02 90

524

00 02 05

523

00 02 49

522

00 07 63 7337

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHANDALA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

4 2

521 1 PIMPRE BK

520

519

Area

Sub -Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8 5

00 07

07 06

Nira Right Bank

Canal in between

GatNo 519 & V.B.

PimpreBk .

2 BAVKALWADI

Area between V.B.

00 19 68

01 29 26 Toto

00 02 80

PimpreBk. &

Bavkalwadi

473

472

471

470

469

468

547

549

548

498

499

500

546

545

544

543

542

541

540

00 03 02

00 03

00 02

00 04 78

00 04 97

17 73

02 62

02 99

00 05 63

03 52

00 04 21

00 28 20

18 10

00 03 46

02 22

00 03 21

00 09 12

08 86

03 22

Asphalted Road in

Gat No 539

538

537

531

532

529

Asphalted Road in between Gat No

529& 62

124

00 06

00 04

2121

11 04

00 15 90

00 10

T 7338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHANDALA

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District : SATARA

GatNo.

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Name ofthe Village

4 2 BAVKALWADI

125 (Contd.)

123

128

129

130

132

133

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

278

149

150

208

225

226

227

87 3 MARIAICHIWADI

194

113 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub- Division

Are Sq.mt

No. Hectare

7 8

00 00 09

00 02 11

00 02 04

00 01 21

00 00 96

02 06

00 01 46

00 04 48

00 01 19

00 03 05

00 05 28

00 05 14

00 09 06

00 08 80

00 01 55

00 08 07

00 22 20

00 04 30

00 05 05

00 11 18

00 11 91

00 07 36

03 58 21

Total

00 16 58

00 06 21

00 03 81

00 09 15

04 35

00 09 42

00 08 88

00 12 08

00 08 05

00 16 85

00 03 56

00 53 57

Metalled Road in

01 95

Gat No 113

117

118

119 00 15 80

00 35 55

00 17 35

CartTrack in Gat

No 175

175 00 03 81

00 23 43 7339

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHANDALA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

172 3 MARIAICHIWADI

171

169 (Conted)

Sq.mt

Area Are

Sub -Division No. Hectare

07 91

02 35

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

169& 167

180

167

168

03 65

14 71

00 20 42

00 04 88

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

166& 160

158

159

160

161

162

163

184

00 33

02 37

00 17 70

08 18

00 05 07

00 06 71

38 87

06 62

Nala adjacent to

V.B. of

Merialchiwadi

LONAND

Nala in between V.B. of Mariaichiwadi & Survey No 321

321

322

323

Nadipudi Odha in between Survey No 323 & V.B. of Balupatlachiwadl

326

329

3139 G1/04-32

21 77

Total

42 48

00 10 08

41 76

13 68

00 7340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHANDALA

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (1 ) ]

District : SATARA

Sr. No.

Survey No.

Gat No. Name of the Village

4 4 LONAND (Contd.)

Metalled Road in Survey No 329

Railway Line in between SurveyNo 329& 328

328

SH - 81 in between SurveyNo 328& 341

341

334

337

338

339

340

345

346

347

Nala in between Survey No 347 & V.B. Koregaon

5 BALUPATLACHI WADI

Nadipudi Nala in between V.B. State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt

7 8

00 02 88

00 23 76

00 04 32

00 36 72

00 14 40

00 27 36

00 10 80

00 09 22

00 09 79

00 32 40

00 30 96

00 56 16

00 07 49

04 52 74

Total

00 04 66

Lonand &

Balupatlachiwadi

166

167

165

158

157

180 00 05 65

00 01 45

00 15 97

00 12 68

00 06 99

00 47 60

Totol

[No. R- 31015/31/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

7341 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नईदिल्ली , 29 अक्तूबर , 2004

का. आ . 2734.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचमा से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम . वी. चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना ( लोनी से पकनी तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड, लोनी टर्मिनल , कदमवाक वस्ती गाँव , हवेली तालुका , पुणे जिला , महाराष्ट्र 412201 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 7342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 / KARTIKA 8 , 1926

अनुसूची तालूका : खटाव

[ PART 11 - SEC. 3 ( 11 ) ]

जिला : सातारा

गाय का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 मोल

148 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं,

6 7

00 37 16

वाड नंबर 148 में

00 01 94

प्रमुख जिला मार्ग 20

159

160

206

205

200

224

199

225

243

242

269

274

273

280

279

276

278

277

357

358

435

434

433

432

431

427

426

429

424

00 14 47

00 48 58

00 52

00 03 25

00 44 08

00 55 88

00 07 41

00 60 68

00 12

00 04 82

00 21 54

00 08

00 01 62

00 06 07

00 15 24

00 36 94

00 04

00 03

00 02 29

00 01 84

00 06 86 7343 भारत का राजभत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग - खण्ड 3 ( 11 ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सातारा

तालूका : खटावच

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टर

गाय का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

8 7

389-390,395-419

386 पै

मोक (जारी )

389 पै

00 04

गट नंबर 388 ,

532,533,534,535,

536 , 537 और 544

में प्रमुख जिला

मार्ग 20

388 पै

05 22

532 पै

533

534

00 01

536

538

00 01

539

00 01

540 पै

544 पै

00 01

545 पै

00 01

546 पै

547 पै

548 पै

550 पै

551 पै

00 01

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

564

00 01 24

565

00 01

566

568 पै

572 7344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] तालूका : खटान

जिला : सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल गाव का माम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

एयर

हेक्टर

सं.

वर्ग मीटर 1

6 7

8 1

मोळ

573 पै

00 01 98 (जारी)

574

00 01 24

575

00 01 30

576

00 01 46

579

00 02 22

580

00 02 87

581

00 02 16

582

00 02 51

597

00 10 56

गट नंबर 581 , 582

और 597 के बीच का

00 01 92

नाला

605 पै

00 04 45

607

00 04 95

608

00 03 12

598

00 04 77

610

00 06 21

611

00 03

613

00 19 77

612

00 12 98

गट नंबर 614 के पास

00 02 36

का माला

614

00 02 82

में

गट नंबर 614

00 02 52

नाला

615

00 12 80

641

639

00 11 27

638

00 04 83

637

00 07 50

646

647

00 17 33

658

00 12 07

657

00 11 31

656

00 06

655

00 01 59 7345 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1925

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

685

मोलु

00 26

684

(जारी)

08 36

योग

3365

डिस्कळ

3373

गट

और

3365,3374

00 03

3373 के बीच में

नाला

00 02

3374

05 97

3375

06 81

3377

00 07 16

3371

3380

गट नंबर

और

3380/4,1885

3380/3 के बीच

में नाला

1885

गट नंबर 1886 और

1250 के बीच में

1886

00 03

1250

1249

1251

1256

1248

1247

00 11

1241

1240

1239 7346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART 11 -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] तालूका : खटाव

जिला : सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाय का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 2

डिस्कल

गट नंबर 1139,1129

(जारी )

और 1133 के बीच

00 03 62

में नाला

1129

00 03 89

1133

00 01 05

गट नंबर 1133 और

1134 के पास

00 21 00

की भूमि

गट नंबर 1134 और

1135 के बीच का नेटल्ड

00 03 92

रोड

1134

00 06 68

1135

00 08

1136

00 05 73

1137

00 06 15

1138

00 01 71

1142

00 04 54

1143

00 05 08

1144

00 05

1145

00 08 36

1146

00 02 97

1147

00 02

1148

00 02 75

1149

00 05 81

1150

1151

00 03 35

1152

00 01

1153

00 02 85

1154

00 36 82

गट नंबर 1154 और

419/6 के बीच में

00 02 64

नाला

419

00 76

23 7347

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

खटाव

तालूका :

गट नंबर

सर्वे मंबर

गाय का नाम

कम सं.

411 डिस्कछ

411 (नागरी)

411

412

413

321 3

ललगुण

320

319

326

325

326

327

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

338

369 3139 G1/04-33

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वसे मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00.

23 31

21 11

09 12

03 94

2(1)

2(2)

2(3)

2(5)

05 78

2(6)

2(7) :

05 89

2(8)

2(9)

00 15

05 30

योग

00 13

05 58

00 03

00 01

02 89

00 01

00 7348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : खटाव

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)]

जिला: सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 3

ललगुण

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 369 और

374 के बीच

(जारी )

में नाला

373

372

00 02 73

00 14 42

00 12 62

गट नंबर 383 में

मेटल्ड रास्ता

383

385

386

387

391

396

835

411

00 05 55

00 04 35

00 07 65

00 05 90

00 29

00 18 49

00 05 61

409और 410

422

423

00 13 01

00 13 05

00 02 96

गट नंबर 423 और

114 के बीच में

येरला नदी

114

103

100

00 09 10

00 20 42

20 40

00 06 23 9

06 10

00 14 01 7

39 6

25 18

गट नंबर 41 में

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

1158

140

802

801

1142

1190

00 01 60

00 13

00 10 45

00 05 41

00 23

00 27 05

00 16 14

05 7349 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

जिला : सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7 8 2

1191

ललगुण

23 90

1192

(जारी)

1208

00 02 78

00 22 57

1206

गट नंबर 1206

00 01

में नाला

1205

00 06

1203

08 37

1204

1256

04 56

1257

04 27

1260

गट नंबर 1260 और

1252के बीच

की भूमि

1372

1371

26 29

1368

ब

1366

1367

00 01 13

06 29

1365

1364

29 23

1363

1362

1385

1387.

1386

23 46

00 09

1389

00 27

1433

1432

00 11

गट नंबर 1445

00 01 03

में नाला

1445

1471

00 21

1454

00.

1452

03 59

1453

1462

00 08 07

0033

1480

भोग 09 75 7350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004 / KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 4

पवारवाडी

338

335

336

356

361

360

359

358

351 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8

68 49

00 10 78

00 04 47

12 12

00 00 22

00 06 02

00 09

00 11

गट नंबर 351 , 391

और 393 के बीच का

रास्ता

393

391

392

394

417

396

416

00 01 89

00 08 83

00 02 39

00 38

00 26 35

00 25 98

00 38 34

00 21 73

गट नंबर 416 और

412के बीच का गाडी

रास्ता

412

413

415

453

471

470

472

468

467

525

533

584

00 01

00 02

00 00 32

00 17

19 20

00 26

00 40 09

00 02 88

00 06

00 12 15

00 32

00 08 31

00 04 97 7351

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 ,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

6 7

पवारवाडी

534

26 23

535

(जारी)

04 53

548

546

00 01 54

545

00 12 84

547

05 50 92

योम

48 वर्धनगड

194

00 02 55

195

00 26 76

193

220

23 41

218

गट नंबर 218 , 217

और 216 के बीच में

अस्फालटेड गुस्ता

217

00 01 87

216

00 26 11

215

42 31

315

00 03

316

00 07

337

336

334

16 48

338

गट नंबर 338 , 336

और 334 के बीच में

राज्य मार्ग 74

00 35

339

00 13 41

340

341

04 57

329

02 62

1124

पुसेगाँव

1126 7352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : खटाव

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

जिला: सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कमः सं.

4 6

1125

1129 पुसेगाँव (जारी)

1130

1136

1137

994

993

1016

1017

1018

1019

1020

987

986

983

984

985

975

974

976

977

797

774

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

00 05

00 20 38

00 11 23

10 33

00 16 67

00 03 99

00 27 48

00 02 39

00 18

03 33

00 01 47

00 05 05

00 15

00 08 54

00 06 12

00 18 17

00 05 07

00 37

00 00 64

00 38 53

गट नंबर 774 में

00 06

प्रमुख जिला मार्ग 20

778

776

765

764

763

761

760

759 7

777 विसापुर

778

779

785

786

787

04 01

12 84

00 09

00 07 03

00 02 07

00 01 78

00 15 80

00 38 50

04 05 01 योग

00 08 10

00 09

00 21

00 08

00 15

00 13 7353 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला : सातारा

राज्य महाराष्ट्र तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

गाव का नाम

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 1

8 2

894

09 09

00 09

893

विसापुर (जारी)

00 06 75

892

00 03 30

891

890

00 31 59

880

858

गट नंबर 858 और

1112 के बीच में

07 44

नाला

1112

00 01

15 93

1115

1110

00 09

00 15 45

1117

1103

00 12

1116

00 09 71

1134

06 09

1135

00 04

1139

गट नंबर 1139 के

पास का नाला

15 84

1158

00 09

1159

12 37

1160

00 02

1161

02 87

योग

10 61

952

खातगुण

00 03

950

00 22

947

946

00 04

943

942 7354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : खटाव

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii ) )

जिला : सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 8

खातगुण

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 942 और

801 के बीच

(जारी)

की भूमि

801

827

828

829

830

842

843

841

845

847

856

861

853

854

855

865

866

867

868

871

787

533

788

786

783

700

00 10 64

00 06 52

00 10 08

00 10 00

00 12 48

00.02

00 05 23

00 08 20

00 10 84

00 01 53

00 04 54

00 05 10

00 05 77

00 07

00 12 53

00 04 00

00 07 59

00 31 68

04 27

00 37 82

00 48 39

00 12 62

00 12 01

गट नंबर 700 में

नाला

711

710

709

707

706

705

702

704

00 05

00 14 62

00 10 78

00 05 71

00 05 07

00 10 41

00 08 51 7355 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खाव

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

मीटर

वर्ग

एयर सर्वे नंबर

हेक्टर

गाथ का माम

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

703

खातगुण

683

(जारी)

664

665

666

589

582

588

583

584

585

586

580

587

05 27

याग

00 29

344

जखणगाँव

345

348

346

00 45 82

गट नंबर 9 से 7 और

355 के बीच में

अस्फालटेड सस्ता

355

356

511

510

00 56

509

512

गट नंबर 513 में

अस्फालटेड रास्ता

514

516

515

533

517

3139 GI /04-34 7356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तालूका : खटाव

जिला: सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र गाव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

8 9

जखणगाँव

518

00 01 26

532

(जारी )

00 12 12

गट नंबर 532 और

538 के बीच में

00 02

गाडी रस्ता

538

00 10 55

539

544

00 07 64

गट नंबर 544 और

569 के बीच में नाला

00 03 43

569

00 04 27

568

00 08 85

567

00 04 14

571

731

00 15 24

570

00 02 18

732

00 02

729

00 17 82

728

00 11 79

727

00 06 40

696

00 13 10

697

693

00 08

692

00 06 17

691

00 04

689

00 12 30

698

00 68

699

00 04 43

700

701

00 18 91

1185

00 07 37

1186

00 04 57

1184

00 36 92

1183

00 08 32

05 07 82

योग

वडखल

130

126

00 10 76

113

112

00 16 32 7357

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड

गट नंबर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टर

सर्वे नंबर

गाय का नाम

सं.

कम सं.

111

वडखल

110

00 (जारी)

109

78.

108

104

100

101

00 11

00 39

गट नंबर 19 के आगे

और गाँव वडखळ, भोसरे

00 02

पर

कीसीमा

भूमि

04 07

योग

गाँव सीमा भोसरे और

भोसरे

गट नंबर 1147 और

1130 के

बीच में नाला

1147

1130

1144

1143

00 21

1142

1141

1150 7358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] तालूका : खटाव

जिला: सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

उप-खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल गाय का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कमः सं.

वर्ग

हेक्टर एयर मीटर

सं.

6 7 8 11

भोसरे

1151

00 03 23

गट नंबर 1151 और

(जारी)

नाला के बीच में

00 02 53

मेटल्ड रस्ता

गट नंबर

1151,1150,1277

00 08 27

और 1278 के बीच में

नाला

1277

00 01 83

1278

00 07 45

1279

00 04 69

1285

00 03 40

गट नंबर 1285 और

1299 के बीच

00 01 30

की भूमि

1299

1291

00 02 10

1293

00 01 54

1294

00 01 87

1295 से

1308

00 01 18

गट नंबर 1295 से

1308 के बीच

00 04

में नाला

1284

00 08 23

गट नंबर 1311 के

बीच में नाला

1310

00 04 11

1254

गट नंबर 1254 और

30 के बीच में

00 00 95

मेटल्ड मुस्ता

गट नंबर 29 और 30

के बीच की भूमि

7359 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सातारा

खटाव

तालूका :

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

मीटर

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

सर्वे नंबर

गाय का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

00 07

भोसरे

(जाबी)

गह नंबर 64 और

146 के बीच में प्रमुख

जिला मार्ग 44

146

गढ़ नंबर 146 और

153 के बीच में

रास्ता

153

152

150

151

154

172

176

175

174

00 11

180

20 67

182

183

185

04 48

यमा

458

लोणी

457

455

450

00 04

449

00 06

448 7360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926 [ PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] तालूका : खटाव

जिला: सातारा

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गद नंबर

कम सं.

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर

उप-खण्ड सं,

6 7 8 12

447

00 26 33 लोणी (जारी)

445

भाग 01 30 88 13

वरुड

1254

00 37 78

1251

00 13 48

1250

00 16 25

1247

00 60 74

1246

00 07 50

1245

00 01 86

1187

00 07 86

1220

1221

00 02 01

1222

00 02 02

1223

00 06 90

1227

00 07 21

1228

00 13 12

1234

00 17 62

1178

00 12 44

गट नंबर 1176 और

00 02

852के बीच में नाला

852

00 21 11

851

00 35 40

840

00 22 86

839

00 14 69

अ

756

00 14 64

गट नंबर 756 अ में

00 02

बाला

758

00 08 73

759

00 22

747

00 03 84

746

00 03 87

747

00 06 51

715

00 69 72

718

00 18 57

717

00 36 99 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7361 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर गाव का नाम

कम सं.

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

गट नंबर 717

वरुड

(जारी )

में नाला 723 गट नंबर 723 और 724 के बीच में जिला

मार्ग

724

औंध

21 14

सर्वे नंबर 61 और

125 के बीच में मेटलल्ड रस्ता

126

127

125

124

132

133

134

सर्वे नंबर 134 और

167 के बीच में अस्फालटेड रस्ता

167

166

सर्वे नंबर 166

में नाला

137

165

163

02 32

00 10

-79

योग

15 22

21 53

42 37

90 51

25 06

00 44

00 01

00 24 87

00 04

08 61

00 31 7362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 / KARTIKA 8, 1926

तालूका : खटाव

[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

जिला : सातारा

गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

कम सं.

4 14

औंध

162

184

(जारी)

185

186

187

188

189

190

192

193

194

खरशिंगे

338

335

334

333

332

331

104

106

119

1.20

121

वर्ग

एयर

हेक्टर

मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 01 97

00 37 86

00 29 10

00 11 01

00 09 99

00 18 94

00 23 10

00 21 21

00 12 69

00 56 02

00 10 93

00 15 84

00 22 21

00 51

00 24 87

00 06 65

गट नंबर 121 में

00 02 29

मेटल्ड रास्ता

122

123

124

126

125

154

153

165

152

164

00 02

00 03 21

00 01 83

00 02 19

00 09 41

00 09 11

00 02 70

00 11 08

गट नंबर 164 और

17.6 के बीच में नाला

↓

178

18 7363 [भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

जिला : सातारा

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

एयर को मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 खरशिंगे

176

18 15

764

(जारी)

गट नंबर 764 और

776 से 799 के

05 18

बीच में मेटल्ड रोड

776से 799

37 74

814

817

08 07

816

20 60

823

00 29 67

03 51

योग

येलीव

252

00 11 07

253

00 07

254

00 11

255

00 06 39

827

योग 100 49 69 पळशी

925

117

924

00 02 68

22 41

922

921

12 43

951

920

919

00 09

870

00 03

872

00 17 32

00 17 38

873

गट नंबर 873 में

00 04

राज्य मार्ग 69

874

00 02

00 01

834

835

00 06

860

00 13

861

00 11

862

00 11

849

3139G1/04-35 7364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) )

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 पळशी

846

847

15 75

(जारी )

845

गट नंबर 845 और

08 33

844 के बीच में कनाल

844

00 06

843

00 02 48

योग

लाडेगाँव

122

00 41

114

113

115

112

02 18

107

00 02

106

00 02

गट नंबर 106 और

98 के बौध की भूमि

02 96

00 01 37

00 02 24

00 02

00 01

00 03

00 01

00 03

00 25

00.01

00 01 65

गट नंबर 74 और

149 के बीच

00 06

में नाला

148

00 29

149 7365

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

क्षेत्रफल कम

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर गाव का मान

उप-खण्ड सं.

167

लाहेगाव

160

162

(जारी)

161

163

164

00 05

245

247

00.

245

गट नंबर 245 और

305 के बीच मेटल्ड

रास्ता

↓

305

306

307

304

302

311

312

333

332

331

330

329

00 01

312

328

327

324

323

322

382

11 81

378

389

388

394

395

396

393

397

399

03 98

योग 7366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

तालूका : खटाव

[ PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला: सातारा

गाय का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर कम सं.

4 19 वांझोली

326

327

328

342

344

345

346 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टर

मीटर उप -खण्ड सं.

6 7

00 07 14

00 03

00 06 02

00 22 99

00 09 54

00 16 61

गट नंबर 346 और

347 के बीच मेटल्ड

रास्ता

347

348

00 04 02

00 15 81

00 29 79

गट नंबर 348 और

349 के बीच में

नाला

349

350

351 20

रहाटणी

613

612

गट नंबर

612,651,650 और .

00 05 69

00 68 25

00 22 06

28 90

00 योग 02 74

01 00 25

00 81 45

00 03 13

610 के बीच में

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

610

588

589

580

590

591

गट नंबर 591 और .

30 10

00 40 35

00 05

580 के बीच में नाला

579

561

00 24 23 7367

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

जिला: सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल शाब का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर कम सं.

उप-खण्ड सं.

67 8 20

रहाटणी

गढ़ नंबर 579,580

और 561 के बीच में

(जारी)

अस्फालटेड रस्ता

572

00 38

568

567

00 07 87

566

00 01 19

565

562

00 04

503

00 24 09

योग

चोराडे

12 79

1410

1409

12 81

1399

00 10

गट नंबर 1399

और 1398 में

राज्य मार्ग

1398

00 66

1397

1395

1396

00 05

1394

00 01 84

1391

00 14 38

1392

00 12 15

1372

00 10

1364

1366

00 08 55

1367

00 01

1371

00 23 49

1370

1369

00 07

00 01

1313

1 अ

1313 7368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART 11 SEC, 3 (ii))

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाव

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

क्षेत्रफल गाव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

गट नंबर

कम सं.

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

उप-खण्ड सं.

6 7 8 21

चोराडे

गट नंबर 1369 और

1315 के बीच

78 (जारी)

में लाला

1315

00 01 83

00 23

1314

970

00 10 09

969

00 04 73

967

00 04

964

963

00 02

962

00 04

ਭਾਵ ਸਂਭਦ 962 ਗੈਰ

931 के बीच का

00 03

मेटल्ड रास्ता

00 42

931

गट नंबर 931 में

09 02

मेटल्ड रास्ता

743

00 05 63

779

767

00 03 44

766

763

00 01 22

761

00 00 34

760

00 01 01

762

00 03 76

759

00 15 16

747

गट नंबर 747/1 और

747/2के बीच

00 03

में नाला

748

750

751

754

755

789

791

795

00 04

795 7369 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला : सातारा

तालूका : खटाब

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

मीटर सधैं नंबर

हेक्टर एयर वर्ग गावं की नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

कम सं.

796

चोराडे

00 30

800

(नारी)

00 07

705

05 11

भोग

[फा. सं. आर-31015/32/2004- ओ. आर- ।। ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29th October, 2004

S. O. 2734.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described inthe Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of india containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority , Mumbai -Pune Pipeline Extension Project (from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Loni Terminal , Kadamwakwasti Village , Haveli Taluka . Pune District , Maharashtra - 412 201 7370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Taluka : KHATAV

District: SATARA

Sr. No.

SurveyNo.

GatNo.

Village Name of the

4 1

MOL

148 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 37 16

MDR - 20 in Gat No

148

159

160

206

205

200

224

199

225

243

242

269

274

273

280

279

276

278

277

357

358

435

434

433

432

431

427

428

429

424

00 01 94

00 14 47

00 48 58

00 19 06

00 52 11

00 00 12

00 03 25

00 44 08

00 55 88

00 07 41

00 60 68

00 12 27

00 04 82

00 21 54

00 08 42

00 00 02

00 15 89

00 01 62

00 06 07

00 15 24

00 36 94

00 04 00

00 03 20

00 02 29

00 01 84

00 00 17

00 00 05

00 00 10

00 06 86 7371

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District: SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

Sub-Divisiem

T 8

00 50

389-390,395-419

MOL (Cond.)

386(P)

389 (P)

MDR - 20 in Gat No.

388,532,533 ,

534,535 , 536,

00 07 15

04 67

537 & 544

388(P)

532(P)

533

534

536

538

539

540( P)

544(P)

545(P)

546(P)

547(P)

548(P)

550( P)

551( P)

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

564

565

566

568(P)

572 3139 G1 /04-36

12 31

05 22

01 62

00 86

00 01 58

01 60

01 85

03 29

00 01 75

01 99

02 58

00 .

02 51

00 01 10

00 01 00

00 90

00 00 86

00 00 77

00 81

03 69

00 01

03 93

00 7372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 / KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Taluka : KHATAV

District : SATARA

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area Sr. No.

Survey No.

GatNo.

Name of the Village

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sq.mt 1

6 7 8 1

MOL(Contd.)

573(P)

00 01 98

574

00 01 24

575

00 01 30

576

00 01 46

579

00 02 22

580

00 02 87

581

00 02 16

582

00 02 51

597

00 10 56

Nala in between

GatNo 581,582 &

00 01 92

597

605( P)

00 04 45

607

00 04 95

608

00 03 12

598

00 04 77

610.

00 06 21

611

00 03 60

613

00 19 77

612

00 12 98

Nala near Gat No 614

00 02 36

614

00 02 82

Nala in Gat No 614

00 02 52

615

00 12 80

641

00 00 09

639

00 11 27

638

00 04 83

637

00 07 50

646

00 00 10

647

00 17 33

658

00 12 07

657

656

00 06 44

655

00 01 59 7373

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sub- Division No.

SurveyNo.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

7 8

13 80

685

MOL(Conta)

26 19

684

36 99

Total

00 19 33

3365

DISKAL

00 10 85

3373

Nala in between Gat

00 03 20

No 3365, 3374 & 3373

00 02 30

3374

05 97

3375

06 81

3377

07 16

3371

12 44

3380

00 00 05

3380

00 29 53

3380

00 00

3380

Nala in between

00 04 27

GatNo 3380/4 ,

1885 & 3380/3

1885

Nala in between Gat

03 33

No 1886 & 1250

01 78

1886-

03 83

1250

08 52

1249

00 93

1251

00 00

1256

00 06 50

1248

05 69

1247

00 11 22

1241

19 23

1240

1239 7374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

District : SATARA

GatNo.

Sr. No.

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

4 2

DISKAL (Conta)

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

7 8

00 03 62

Nala in between

Gát No 1139,1129

&1133

1129

1133

00 03 89

00 01 05

Area between Gat

00 21 00

No 1133 & 1134

Metalled road in

GatNo

00 03 92

1134 & 1135

1134

1135

1136

1137

1138

1142

1143

1144

1145

1146

1147

1148

1149

1150

1151

1152

1153

1154

Nala in between GatNo 1154 & 419/6

419

00 06 68

00 08 47

00 05 73

00 06 15

00 01 71

00 04 54

00 05 08

00 05 64

00 08 36

00 02 97

00 02 72

00 02 75

00 05 81

00 07 80

00 03 35

00 01 42

02 85

00 36 82

00 02 64 6

00 23 76 7375

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District: SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

411 2

DISKAL (Conta.)

411

412

413

321 LALGUN

320

319

326

325

326

327

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

338

369

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are

00 00 58 5

00 23

00 10

00 09

00 40 23

2(1)

04 46

2(2)

00 05

2(3)

06 68

2(5)

00 05

2(0)

2(7)

00 05

2(8)

03 21

2(9)

Total

13 09

00 05 58 1

00 00 04

00 03 88 2

00 03 23

00 01

00 02

01 98

00 05 27

07 78

00 08 83 [PART 11-SEC . 3( ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926 .

7376

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sub-Division No.

SurveyNo.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are Sr. No.

Name ofthe Village

7 8

02 73

Stream in between

Gat No 369 & 374

LALGUN (Contd.)

14 42

373

372

Metalled Road in

00 02

Gat No 383

16 12

383

00 05 55

385

04 35

386

00 07 65

387

391

396

00 18 49

835

00 05 61

411

13 01

409 & 410

13 05

422

423

09 10

Yerlą River in between Gat No

423 & 114

00 20 42

114

00 20 40

103

100

Asphalted Road In

01 60

Gat No 41

13 41

10 45

1158

140

00 27

802

00 59

801

1142

1190 7377 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

Taluka : KHATAV

District : SATARA

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sub-Division No.

Sr. No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village

7 1

00 24 91

1191

3 LALGUN (Contd.)

00 23 90

1192

1208

00 02 78

22 57

1206

Nala in Gat No 1206

01 96

00 06 57

1205

1203

00 87

00 08 37

1204

00 13 71

1256

00 04 56

1257

04 27

1260

Area in between Gat

10 07

No 1260 & 1252

1372

00 29 87

00 10 67

1371

26 29

1368

17 46

1366

1367

00 01 13

00 06 29

1365

1364

00 04 95

1363

00 29 23

00 63 56

1362

1385

00 00 12

1387

00 02 09

1386

00 23 46

00 09 78

1389

00 27 51

1433

00 11 80

1432

Stream in Gat

00 01 03

No 1445

1445

00 09 96

1471

04 09

21 12

1454

18 37

1452

00 03 59

1453

00 08 07

1462

00 33 45

1480

09 75 51

Total 7378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Taluka : KHATAV

District : SATARA

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Gat No.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Sub-Division No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

6 7 8 4 PAWARWADI

338

335

00 10 78

336

00 04 47

356

00 12 12

361

00 00 22

360

00 08 49

359

00 06 02

358

00 09 97

351

00 11 59

Road in between

00 01 89

GatNos 351 ,

391& 393

393

08 83

391

00 02 39

392

00 38 84

394

00 26 35

417

00 25 98

396

38 34

416

00 21 73

CartTrack in

00 01 69

between Gat No

416& 412

412

00 02 30

413

00 00 32

415

00 17 51

453

00 19 20

471

00 26 24

470

00 40 09

472

00 02 88

468

00 06 72

467

00 12 15

525

00 32 67

533

00 08 31

'04

584

97 7379 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004 /कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sq.mt

Sub- Division No. Hectare Are SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameofthe Village

534

26 23

535

PAWARWADI (Contd.)

548

546

00 01 54

545

12 84

547

05 50

Atal

194

5 VARDHANGAD

195

26 76

193

00 19

220

218

Asphalted road in

between Gat No

218, 217 & 216

217

216

26 11

215

315

03 19

316

00 07 91

337

00 04 27

336

334

00 16 48

338

SH - 74 in between

05 26

GatNo 338.

336& 334

35 69

339

00 13 41

340

00 10 89

341

00 04 57

329

02 62 18

Total

00 29 84

1124

PUSEGAON

15 73

1126

3139 GI/04-37 7380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8, 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

District : SATARA

Sr. No.

SurveyNo.

GatNo.

Village Name of the

4 6

PUSEGAON

1125 (Contd.)

1129

1130

1136

1137

994

993

1016

1017

1018

1019

1020

987

986

983

984

985

975

974

976

977

797

774 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 05 02

00 20 38

00 11 23

00 10 33

00 16 67

00 03 99

00 27 48

00 02 39

00 18 59

00 05 29

00 03 33

00 01 47

00 05 05

00 15 64

00 00 05

00 08 54

00 06 12

00 18 17

00 05 07

00 37 44

00 00 64

00 38 53

MDR - 20 in Gat

No 774

778

776

765

764

763

761

760

759 VISAPUR

777

778

779

785

786

787

00 06 01

00 04 01

00 12 84

00 09 93

00 07 03

00 02 07

00 01 78

00 15 80

00 38 50 Total 04 05 01

00 08 10

00 09 72

00 21 60

00 08 10

00 15 75

00 13 14 7381

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sub - Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

00 09

894

893

7 VISAPUR (Contd.)

00 06 75

892

03 30

891

07 31

890

880

00 15

858

Nala in between

Gat No 858 & 1112

01 56

1112

00 15 93

1115

1110

1117

1103

1116

1134

1135

1139

Nala adjacent to

Gat No 1139

1158

00 09

1159

1160

1161

02 87 97

Total

00 10 61

952

KHATGUN

950

00 22 46

947

00 24

946

943

942 7382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

District: SATARA

Sr. No.

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Name ofthe Village

4 8 KHATGUN (Contd .)

State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub -Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

Area between Gat

00 10 64

No 942 & 801

801

827

828

829

830

842

843

841

845

847

856

861

853

854

855

865

866

867

868

871

787

533

788

786

783

700

00 06 52

00 00 80

00 10 08

00 10 00

00 12 48

00 12 99

00 02 09

00 05 23

00 08 20

00 10 84

00 07 23

00 01 53

00 04 54

00 05 10

00 05 77

00 07 40

00 12 53

00 04 00

00 07 59

00 31 68

00 04 27

00 37 82

00 00 31

00 48 39

00 12 62

00 12 01

Nala in Gat No 700

711

710

709

707

706

705

702

704

00 02 39

00 05 30

00 14 62

00 10 78

00 05 71

00 05 07

00 10 41

00 08 51 7383 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[ भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sub-Division No.

SurveyNo.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare Sr. No.

Name of the Village

09 39

703

8 KHATGUN (Contd.)

683

664

665

00 07

666

589

07 23

582

08 88

588

583

584

585

00 02 86

586

580

587

27 59

Total

00 29 04

344

9 JAKHANGAON

00 07

345

348

346

45 82

01 25

00 15

06 00

Asphalted Road in between Gat

No 9 to 7 & 355

355

07 43

356

511

510

00 00 56

509

512

00 03 76

Asphalted Road in Gat No 513

07 63

514

516

515

00 00

533

517 7384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

District: SATARA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Village Name of the

4 9

518

532 JAKHANGAON (Contd.)

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare Sq.mt

7 8

01 26

00 12 12

Cart-Track in

between Gat No

00 02 94

532& 538

538

539

544

00 10 55

00 00 06

00 07 64

Nala in between

00 03 43

Gat No 544 & 569

569

568

567

571

731

570

732

729

728

727

696

697

693

692

691

689

698

699

700

701

1185

1186

1184

1183 VADKHAL

130 10

126

113

112

00 04 27

00 08 85

00 04

00 00 11

00 15

00 02 18

00 02 72

00 17 82

00 11 79

00 06 40

00 13 10

00 00 05

00 08 50

00 06 17

00 04. 75

12 30

00 68 86

00 04 43

00 00 05

00 18 91

00 07 37

00 04 57

00 36 92

00 08 35

07 82 Total 05

00 85

00 10 76

00 00 92

00 16 32 7385 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Hectare Are Sr. No.

Name of the Village

00 57

111

110

VADKHAL (Contd.)

03 68

109

00 00

108

19 81

104

00 00. 15

100

101

17 09

11 31

17 70

16 28

03 88

22 78

39 90

02 65

Area nextto Gat

No 19 & VB of

Bhosre

04 07 00

Total

BHOSRE

00 02 54

Nala on V.B. of Bhosre village & GatNo 1147 & 1130

00 07

1147

1130

1144

1143

1142

1141

08 63

1150 7386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Taluka : KHATAV

District : SATARA

State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

GatNo.

Sr. No.

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 1

6 7 8

1151

00 03 23 11 BHOSRE (Contd.)

00 02 53

Metalled Road

between Gat No

1151 & Nala

Nala between Gat

00 08 27

No 1151,1150,

1277 & 1278

1277

00 01 83

1278

00 07 45

1279

00 04 69

1285

00 03 40

00 01 30

Area between Gat

No 1285 & 1299

1299

00 00 80

1291

00 02 10

1293

00 01 54

1294

00 01 87

1295 Το 1308

00 01 18

Stream in Gat No

00 04 11

1295 Το 1308

1284

00 08 23

Stream in Gat

00 00 27

No 1311

1310

00 04

1254

00 26 53

00 00 95

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

1254 & 30

Area in between

00 00 36

Gat No 29 & 30

7387 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sub -Division No.

Are Sq.mt

Hectare

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

7 8

00 07 24

00 02 92

BHOSRE (Conta.)

00 21

00 13

00 06

06 26

00 09

00 19

04 72

MDR - 44 in

between Gat No 64

&146

146

Road in between

Gat No 146 & 153

153

05 20

152

00 02 39

150

10 16

151

23 44

154

172

176

175

18 05

174

00 11 62

180

182

00 27

183

00 04

185

04 48 76

Total

00 07

458

LONI

00 16

457

03 64

455

22 49

450

04 53

449

06 10

448

3139 GI/04-38 7388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/ KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii );

Taluka : KHATAV

District : SATARA

State : MAHARASHTRA Sr. No.

Area SurveyNo.

GatNo.

Name of the Village

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are 2

Sq.mt 3

6 7 12

8 LONI (Contd.)

447

00 26 33

445

00 43 26 13

Total

30 88 VARUD

1254

00 37 78

1251

00 13 48

1250

00 16 25

1247

1246

00 07 50

1245

00 01 86

1187

00 07 86

1220

00 03 77

1221

00 02 01

1222

00 02 02

1223

00 06 90

1227

00 07 21

1228

00 13 12

1234

00 17 62

1178

00 12 44

Nala in between

GatNo 1176 & 852

00 02 31

852

00 21 11

851

00 35 40

840

00 22 86

839

00 14 69

756

00 14 64

Nala in Gat No 756 /A

00 02 64

758

00 08 73

759

00 22 25

748

00 13 16

747

00 03 84

746

00 03 87

747

00 06 51

715

00 69 72

718-

00 18 57

717

00 36 99 7389

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 2

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare Sq.mt

Stream in Gat No

717 VARUD (Contd.)

723

01 07

00 57 74

ODR in between

00 02 32

Gat 723 & 724

724

AUNDH

Metalled Road in between Survey No 61 & 125

126

127

125

124

132

133

134

Asphalted Road in between Survey No 134 & 167

167

166

Nala in Survey No

166

137

165

163

00 10 54

79 52

Total

21 53

00 37 68

00 42 37

00 49 15

00 90 51

00 25 06

00 44

00 18 00

73 46

00 03 60

00 10 53

00 01

00 58 05

00 30 96

18 96

00 18 08

18 23

00 01 93

00 34 64

24 87

00 04 08

08 61

00 36 32

00 31 7390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

District : SATARA

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

Name of the Village

4 14

162

AUNDH (Contd.)

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

192

193

194

15 KHARSHINGE

338

335

334

333

332

331

104

106

119

120

121

Metalled Road in

GatNo 121

122

123

124

126

125

154

153

165

152

164

Stream between Gat No 164 & 176

178 State: MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 41 03

00 01 97

00 37 86

00 29 10

00 11 01

00 09 99

00 18 94

23 10

00 21 21

00 12 69

00 56 02

82 66 Total 09

00 13 00

00 10 93

00 15 84

00 22 21

00 00 89

00 51 92

00 24 87

00 06 65

00 00 09

00 07 62

00 02 29

00 03 21

00 01 83

00 02 19

00 09 41

00 00 05

00 09 11

00 02 70

00 00 37

00 11 08

00 05 43

00 00 18 7391

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District: SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sq.mt

Are

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Survey No.

Sr. No.

7 8 Nameofthe Village

00 15 18

176

KHARSHINGE

00 19 10

764

(Contd.)

Metalled Road in between Gat No

764 & 776 to 799

00 37

776 Το 799

814

00 08 07

817

00 20 60

816

00 29 67

823

03 51 72

Total

00 12 95

252

YELEEV

253

00 07 68

254

11 60

255

00 06 39

827

00 49 69

Total

925

PALSHI

00 02 68

924

00 22

922

00 09 81

921

00 12 43

951

00 09 32

920

00 09 59

919

00 03 72

870

17 32

872

873

04 26

SH-69 in Gat No 873

02 24

874

00 01 67

834

00 09 42

835

06 75

860

13 30

861

862

849 7392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

District: SATARA

Sr. No.

GatNo.

SurveyNo.

Nameof the Village

4 17

846 PAL- SHI (Contd.)

847

845 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 08 27

00 15 75

00 08 66

00 08 33

Canal in between

Gat No 845 & 844

844

843 18 LADEGAON

122

114

113

115

112

107

106

00 06 99

00 02 48

15 30 Total 02

00 00 59

00 41 43

00 01 78

00 01 74

00 00 05

00 02 18

00 02 16

00 05 26

Area in between

GatNo 106 & 98

Nala in between Gat No 74 & 149

148

146

00 02 96

00 01 37

00 02 24

00 02 80

00 00 11

00 01 42

00 03 33

00 01 63

00 03 68

00 25 92

00 00 05

00 01 71

00 01 65

00 06 69

00 29 17 7393

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

167 18 LADEGAON

160 (Contd.)

162

161

163

164

245

247

245

Area

Sub-Division No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare

7 8

00 00

00 05 79

00 04

00 10 81

06 26

00 05 81

00 13 43

16 63

03 02

Metalled Road in

between Gat No 245

& 305

305

306

307

304

302

311

312

333

332

331

330

329

312

328

327

324

323

322

382

378

389

388

394

395

396

393

397

399

09 39

00 03

00 05

09 29

07 93

00 08 28

00 19 03

02 30

00 80

01 09

00 01 80

02 19

01 09

00 04 01

00 04

00 28

11 72

16 45

00 63

11 81

00 30 02

02 35

00 04 29

00 08 01

00 01 07

02 64

98 07

Total 7394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

District : SATARA

GatNo.

Sr. No.

SurveyNo.

Name of the Viliage

4 19 VANJHOLI

326

327

328

342

344

345

346 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

7 8

00 07 14

00 03 15

00 06 02

00 22 99

00 34 69

00 09 54

00 16 61

00 04 02

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

346 & 347

347

348

00 15 81

00 29 79

00 05 69

Nala in between

Gat No 348 & 349

349

350

351 20

RAHATNI

613

612

00 68 25

00 22 06

00 28 90

02 74 66 Total

01 00 25

00 81 45

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

00 03 13

612, 651 , 650 &

610

588

589

580

590

591

00 06 88

00 14 79

00 30 10

00 40 35

00 23 48

00 07 44

00 05 74

Nala in between

GatNo 591 & 580

579

561

00 00 10

00 24 23

00 01 83

Asphalted Road in

between Gat No

579,580 & 561

572

00 38 06 7395

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHATAV

Area

GatNo.

Sub -Division No.

Survey No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

568

RAHATNI (Contd)

567

566

14 93

565

00 04 09

562

24 09

563

30 25

Total

12 79

1410

CHORADE

00 12 81

1409

1399

00 02 78

SH - 73 between GatNo

1399 & 1398

1398

1397

1395

1396

00 01

1394

1391

1392

1372

00 00 15

1364

08 55

1366

00 01

1367

00 23 49

1371

1370

07 99

1369

1313

00 00

1313

Nala in between GatNo

1369& 1315

00 01 83

1315

00 23 60

1314

00 10

970

3139 Gl/04-39 7396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Taluka : KHATAV

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

District: SATARA

Sr. No.

SurveyNo.

GatNo.

Name of the Village

4 21

969 CHORADE (Contd.)

967

964

963

962 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Sq.mt 5

6 7 8

04 73

00 04 47

00 00 50

00 02 87

00 04 73

Metalled Road in

between Gat No

00 03 44

962& 931

931

00 42 58

Metalled Road in

00 02 15

Gat No 931

743

779

767

766

763

761

760

762

759

747

00 16 09

00 05 63 1

00 07 99

00 03 44

00 06 08

00 01 22

00 00 34

00 01 01

00 03 76 1

00 15 16 2

00 00 94

Nala in between

GatNo

00 03 07

747/1 & 747/2

748

750

751

754

755

789

791

795

796

800

705

00 12 71

00 08 33

00 09 45

00 06 03

00 10 24

00 02 81

00 00 10 1

00 20 93 2

00 04 27

00 07 34

00 30 12

00 07 01

05 11 17 Total

[No. R-31015/32/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

7397 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

श्रम मंत्रालय

५.

नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2004

Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter tobe referred to as ' the Act ' ), the following dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, 12, Purulia Road, Ranchi and their workmen represented by the State Joint Secretary, FC1 Executive Staff Union , C/o . FCI Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna for adjudication to this Tribunal :

का. आ. 2735.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1847 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ. सी. आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, पटना ( संदर्भ संख्या 50/ 2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the demand of the union to regularise Smt.BaloDevi and 27 others in service by the FCI , Ranchi is justified and correct ? If so, to what relief these workmen are entitled ?"

[सं. एल-22012/41/99- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 30th September, 2004

2.Both the parties have filed written statement and contested the reference . They have adduced oral and documentary evidence as well . This reference has come up for decision pursuant to dispute espoused by Food Corporation of India , Executive Staff Union (for short 'Union' ) against the management of Food Corporation of India ( for short ' Management ' ) with claim to regularise Smt. Balo Devi and 27 other workers in service by the FCI , Ranchi .

S.O. 2735. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 50/2000) ofthe Industrial Tribunal , Patna as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the management ofFood Corporation of India , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004.

[No. L- 22012/41 /99 - IR (CM- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , PATNA

Reference Case No. 5C of 2000

Management of Food Corporation of India, 12, Purulia Road, Ranchi -I and their workmen represented by the State Joint Secretary (Welfare) . F. C. I. Executive Staff Union, C/ o F. C. I , Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna

For the Management : Sri S. K. Gangopadhyay,

District Manager, F. C. 1. &

Others.

For the Workmen :

Kumar , Sri Vijayendra Regional Secretary, F. C. I. , Executive Staff Union.

PRESENT :

3. In short , Union's case is that the concerned workers were employed since 1978 at the Railway Siding, Tatisilwai under management's control after establishment ofFCI Godown to clean and sweep foodgrains , and packup loose grains in bags at the Railway Siding and Godown both. For a short time, Food Corporation of India had appointed Handling and Transport Contractor with a view todeprive workers of their legal rights , when they received their wages through the said contractor. This system was discontinued after protest and the management started direct payment from 1986. It is further stated in written statement that about 200 other labourers were also working there, who were members of FCI Worker's Union and 189 of them have already been regularised w.e.f. 1-6-1993 . The management did not consider the case of present workmen inspite of repeated representations as they were not the members of the said union . Management's discriminatory attitude against similarly situated workmen, while 1000 others have been regularised in service by the FCI , is an unfair labour practice . Concerned workers are still discharging their duties but payment to them has stopped on the plea to consider the same after presentdecision . The union has accordingly prayed for regularisation of services of concerned workers namely Smt . Balo Devi and 27 others from the date other 189 workers of Tatisilwai Godown were regularised.

Priya Saran, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

Patna, dated the 23rd September, 2004.

4. The management on the other hand has denied union's claim by stating in their written statement/ rejoinder that the address and other particulars ofworkers are not mentioned in the reference , that the reference is much belated , that there was neither any demand by the workers nor any refusal by the management, that the union does not exist in the eye of law and the reference is not By the adjudication order No. L-22012 / 41 / 99 - IR (CM- II ) dated 20/28-06-2000 , the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi has referred, under 7398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

7. Apart from above , management's written statement clearly speaks in para 15 that reference no. 103 of 1989 relating to some other workmen had been before this Tribunal , whose services were regularised pursuant ofa settlement . Management's above contention is thus entirely misconceived and against fact.

8. Other Technical objections noted in written statement are all flimsy and not tenable . Moreover, those were neither raised during hearing nor any material has been placed in support thereof.

maintainable . The management's further case is that a contractor was appointed by the FCI for handling and transport work from 16-9-1985 for two years , but he abandoned the job w.e.f. 30-3-1986 . The management thereafter made an ad hoc arrangement from 18-4-1986 by introducing ' MATE SYSTEM ' whereunder casual labourers were engaged from open market , one of them was picked up as their leader and payment to them was made through him . In due course of time , there arose some labour unrest subject matter being discontinuance of D. P. S. followed by Industrial Dispute and reference case No. 103 of 1989 at the behest of another union named as FCIWorker'sUnion, and during its pendency, a settlement was arrived at between the parties and 189 workers were absorbed and regularised in service . The names of Balo Devi and other 27 workers on hand were not there in the list of FCI Worker's Union and hence , their claim is alleged to be false by the management . It is alleged that concerned workers were not in service but seeking back door entry into FC1 . Hence , prayed by the management , for a decision that they are not entitled to any relief whatsoever.

9. Coming now to the principal issue involved in the case , it would be necessary to carefully examine and look to the evidence on record . The issue is as regards the demand of concerned workers for their regularisation in service . As per union, they have been working since 1978 at the Railway Siding , Tatisilwai under control and supervision of FCI to clean foodgrains from Railway Wagons, put in loose grains in bags, sweep the wagons and the Platform and so on, besides performing similar duties at godown . Some other 200 Handling/Ancillary Labourers who were members of FCI Worker's Union , had also been working there and 189 of those , when dispute was raked up by their union , were regularised by the management. The case of concerned workmen being identical , they are claiming for their regularisation as those of above 189 workers .

10. On the contrary, the management has diputed workers' claim saying that they are fake persons seeking back door entries and they have never been in service with FCI ,

5. Itwould be pertinent to note at the outset that the names of concerned 28 workers with their particulars and address are not enclosed with the notification/ reference. The management accordingly took a plea that the reference is vague and no relief can be given to a person of un- disclosed identity. The matter was referred to the Govt . of India , in Labour Ministry for disclosure of the names etc. ofconcerned workers . The union , however, presented the list of all 28 workmen filed before Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Ranchi alongwith authenticated list preparedby the mangement under Assistant Manager's signature with their address and other details and so, the problem stood shelved . This document has been marked asExt . W/4 .

11. Basic point in issue is thus whether concerned workers were serving the FCI as those of others who have been happily regularised by the management . The union has examined four witnesses namely WW1- Gyatri Devi , WW2-Balo Devi , WW3-Birendra Singh, and WW4- Shyam Nandan Upadhyay. It has also filed certain documents (Exts . W/ I to W/ 6 ) to lay support to workers ' claim. The management has produced three witnesses from their side , who are MW1-Kaushal Kishore Nirala, MW2-Mani Prasad and MW3- Vinod Shankar Prasad. They are all FCI's Officers placed at Tatisilwai .

12. WWI , WW2 and WW3 all three are from amongst 28 workers . They have stated in a row that they have been working with F.C.I. at Tatisilwai since 1978. Their job is to sweep and lift food grains, fill in these in bags and so on . Labourers attached with other union have been regularised by the F.C.I. , while they were left out since they were not the members of said union . They all attempted for their absorption but in vain . Hence this case. The management have stopped them payment awaiting Court's verdict although they still work for the F.C.I. 6. The management has also contended that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction over present reference as the situs of employment is allegedly Ranchi . Industrial Disputes Act is silent on this issue . Provisions of Civil Procedure Code are not specifically applicable in a proceeding under Act . Yet. it is settled law that general principles under lying jurisdiction of Civil Court would be relevant for this purpose . Well known test ofjurisdiction ofa Court is that residence of parties and the subject matter ofdispute substantially arising therein . Concerned workers were allegedly performing work in FCI at Tatisilwai, Ranchi . Regional Office whereof is admittedly at Patna . which controls and administers the former . This fact is very much evident from Ext . W/6 . a letter to Deputy Manager. Regional Office , Patna from District Manager. FCI . Ranchi seeking instructions in dealing with some local labour problems . This fact alone is sufficient to settle any controversy as regards jurisdiction of this Tribunal .

13. WW4 is a regular and ancillary worker in the service of F.C.I. His evidence is ex - parte . The management 7399 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

discrimination in not regularising these 28 workers for the simple reason of their not being members of a particular union at whose behest similarly situated 189 workmen were absorbed. It is further agonising that they are engaged even this day but wages stand deferred waiting for the result of this case . Management's action is quite arbitrary, discriminatory and unjustified which should not be permitted to continue any more.

did not cross -examine him . He has emphatically stated in support of total claim of concerned 28 workers that they all have been working till date alongwith him since 1978 and the services of 189 workers including him were regularised in 1994. He further states that concerned workers were not regularised since not being members of their union and their payment has been stopped since February, 1995. The witness has proved Ext . W/ 2 (attendance sheet from 1986 to 1995) and Ext. W/3 (Wage payment charts of various workers ) very much showing the names of concerned workers at places . He has also proved Ext . W/4 showing the names of all 28 workers of this case with address and other particulars under the signature of Asstt . Manager of F. C. I. , which sufficiently establishes their identity. The evidence of an independent and disinterested person like him coupled with Exts . he has proved is thoroughly sufficient to establish Union's claim.

17. Pointing towards age of WWI Gyatri Devi it was urged on behalf of the management that she presently being of 35 years would have been below 10 years in 1978 when she was not capable being in employment and so . worker's claim should be brushed aside . One should not forget that WW1 is a rustic and illiterate lady from labour class and can not be expected to give a correct age and thus discard her case on the ground of her such ignorance . This argument taken by the management can be of no help to them, more so, in view of clinching and onesided evidence establishing their discrimination and arbitrariness as regards worker's claim .

14.Apart from above, the representation ofworker's (Ext. W/ 1 ) submitted by them in January, 1995 bearing notes of different officers on the margin does very well show that their case was genuine even in the eyes of F. C. I. officials . By Ext . W/ 5 and Ext. W/6 one could gather that the workers since their names not in the list of F. C. I. Worker's Union , were agitating and not allowing work at the Railway Siding .

18. To sum up, I would say in view of materials on record and discussions above , that there can be no alternative conclusion in the case on hand but for that the union has firmly established its claim and concerned workers namely Smt . Balo Devi and 27 other shown in the list i.e. Ext . W/4 arc entitled to be regularised in the service of the F. C. 1 .. Ranchi with back wages for the work done by tliem with no payment . The management is accordingly directed to regularise their services without any further delay as those of 189 co- workers front the date they have been regularised in service by the F. C. 1 . management . The management is further directed to pay them all back dues and wages for the work they have donc for the F. C. 1. without payment in a lump sum within two months of notification .

19. Award accordingly.

PRIYA SARAN , Presiding Officer

टाटी सिलवे एफ. सी . आई . रेलवे साइंडिंग अंसलरी का नाम और स्थाई पता

नाम

वर्तमान पता

स्थाई पता

पति/पिता कानाम

15. MW1 and MW2 though have stated to the effect that concerned workers do not work with F. C. 1. and their claim is false and baseless but they identified, when pointed, worker Birendra Singh in Court. MW2 goes a step ahead in admitting that said Birendra Singh worked for F. C. I. during ' MATE SYSTEM' . And, MW3 sets at rest every controversy when he clearly admits during cross- examination that the workers of this case worked at Railway Siding during his tenure from 1984 to 1989 and concerned 28 workers were left to be regularised as their names were not submitted by F. C. 1. Worker's Union on account of its bad role . He also admits in evidence that the workers on hand were similarly performing the work as those of others who were regularised . It is also said by this witness that Ext . W/S and Ext. W/6 relate to the present workers.

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

ग्राम-संरैवटोली

ग्राम-चिलदाग

1. श्रीमती बालो देवी पति स्वर्गीय

पो.- महिलौगं

पो. अनगड़ा

बरतु महतो

थाना-

थाना-वही

टाटीसिलवे

जिला-रांची

जिला- रांची

(झारखण्ड)

ग्राम-सरैयटोली

2. श्रीमती ललीता देवी पति गोपाल

वही

महतो

पो.- महिलौगं

थाना-टाटीसिलवे

जिला-रांची

(झारखण्ड)

16. The evidence led by the parties pointedly suggest that Balo Devi and 27 other workers of this case have beenworking since 1978 at Railway Siding Godown of F. C. I. at Tatisilwai , but they could not be regularised alongwith 189 co- workers for non - submission of their names by F. C. I. Worker's Union, since they were not its members . Although they presented their claim before the management and agitated as well for their absorption but all in vein , The evidence further suggests that they are still working for F. C , I. with no payment as the management is waiting for Court's order . Needless to say, that the management has resorted to unwarranted 7400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 3. श्रीमती पूसो देवी

ग्राम- सरैयटोली ग्राम- सरैयटोली पति श्री शिव दयाल महतो पो. महिलौगं पो.-महिलौगं

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

ग्राम- महिलौगं ग्राम-महिलौगं 14. श्रीमती कोशिला देवी

थाना- टाटीसिलवे

जिला-राँची जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड)

थाना- टाटीसिलवे (झारखण्ड) 4. श्रीमती राजो देवी

वही

वही पति श्री गोपाल मिर्धा

पो.-वही-

पो.-वही- थाना-टाटीसिलवे थाना- टाटीसिलवे

जिला-राँची जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड) (झारखण्ड) 15. श्रीमती शुसीला

पति स्वर्गीय जग्रनाथ महतो

5. श्रीमती सीता देवी

वही

वही पति श्री हरि- नन्दन महतो

वही वही 6. श्रीमती पूनम देवी पति श्री कृष्णा महतो

ग्राम- सरैयटोली ग्राम- संरैक्मेली श्री चैतु महतो

पो.-महिलौगं

श्राना-टाटीसिलवे

पो.- महिलौगं थाना- टाटीसिलवे. जिला राँची जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड) (झारखण्ड)

ग्रास- चतरा

ग्राम- चतरा 16. श्रीमती दुलैयर देवी

वही

7. श्रीमती नूतन देवी

वही पतिस्वर्गीय बाबुलाल महतो

8. श्रीमती सोहरी देवी

ग्राम - जलालाबाद ग्राम - टाटीसिलवे पिता श्री सहदेव विन्द

पो.-असरगंज पो.-वही- पति श्री कविराज ... पो. वाटीसिलवे थाना-अनगड़ा जिला-राँची (झारखण्ड)

पो. दाटीसिलवे थाना-अनगढ़ा जिला-रौंची (झारखण्ड)

-वही- 17. श्रीमती डूभन देवी

थाना-असरगंज थाना-वही

जिला-मुंगेर

(बिहार)

जिला-रांची (झारखण्ड)

-वही-

पति श्री पूसवा महतो

ग्राम- हेसल

पति श्री बासुदेव महतो

18. श्रीमती महेश्वरी

देवी

ग्राम-चतरा 9. श्रीमती कालो देवी पिता श्री राजेन्द्र ग्राम-मधुवन

विन्द

दरियापुर

पो.-अनगड़ा

पो.- हवेली

थाना-वही

पो.-वही-

ग्राम- हेसल प्रो.-वही-

थाना-अनगड़ा

जिला-राँची

थाना-अनगड़ा जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड) (झारखण्ड) 19. श्रीमती निरास देबी

जिला-राँची

खरगपुर

जिला-मुंगेर (झारखण्ड)

ग्राम- सरैयटोली ग्राम- सरैयटोली 10. श्रीमती कलावति देवी

पति श्री बज्जी महतो

पो.-महिलौगं पो.-महिलौनं

थाना-टाटीसिलवे थाना- टादीसिलवे

जिला-राँची जिला- राँची

ग्राम - बिकाश ग्राम-टाटी पति श्री जितराम कुम्हार मो.-ओरमाझी

बाना-वही-

जिला-राँची

पो.-उाटीसिलवे थाना-वही- जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड) (झायुषखण्ड) पिता श्री जादो ग्राम- लखना

ही- 20. श्रीमती सुचपन देवी

(झारखण्ड) (झारखण्ड)

ग्राम-मधुवन ग्राम-टाटी 11. श्रीमती फुल सनि देवी

दरियापुर

पिता श्री रामेश्वर विन्द

पो. टाढ़ी सिलवे थाना- वही-

पो. हवेली खरगपुर

पो.-कजरा

थाना-सूर्यगढ़ा

जिला- मुंगेर (बिहार)

21, श्रीमती मंजु देवी

थाना-वही

जिला-राँची

जिला-मुंगेर (झारखण्ड)

(बिहार)

ग्राम-नौका ग्राम-सरैवटोली 12.श्रीमती पोकलो देवी

पति श्री दुर्गा महतो

पो.- महिलौगं

-वही- पति श्री जरका कुम्हार

ग्राम - टाटी पो.-टाटीसिलवे

भाना-वही

जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड)

22. श्रीमती पातो देवी

पो.-गोपाल गंज थाना-टाटीसिलवे

जिला-राँची

सिमरा थाना-वही- जिला-वही- (झारखण्ड)

-वही- पति श्री जननाथ वही- कुम्हार

-वहीं-

-वही- 23. श्रीमती पिआसो देवी

(बिहार)

ग्राम- संरैयटोली ग्राम- सरैयटोली 13. श्रीमती रोखी देवी

पो.-महिलौगं

पति श्री ननका कुम्हार

ग्राम- सुपाराजाडेरा

24. श्रीमती सोनमय

देवी

श्री नागेश्वर महतो पति

थाना- टादीसिलवे

जिला-रांची

पो.-महिलां थाना- दादीसिलवे जिला-सँची

(झारखण्ड) (झारखण्ड) पत्ति श्री धरमु महतो

मो..राजाडेरा

थाना अनगड़ा जिला- राँची (झारखण्ड) 7401 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Reference No. 43 of 1997

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

PARTIES :

ग्राम-टाटी

ग्राम- चाँदपरगा

25. श्री बिरेन्द्र सिंह

पो. सुरैया भाया

पितास्वर्गीय पचकौरी सिंह

सिदवलियों

The Agent, J. K. Ropeway ofM/ s . Eastern Coalfield Ltd. , P. O. Kajoragram, Distt. Burdwan, (W. B.). Management थाना- सिदवलियों

पो.-टाटीसिलवे थाना-वही- जिला- राँची ( झारखण्ड)

जिला-गोपालगंज

Versus

(बिहार)

ग्राम-टाटी-

सिलवे

पति श्री चनकु बैठा

26. श्रीमती गायत्री देवी

Sri Dharma Bhuiyan , Ex -Bucket Man of J. K. Ropeway, represented by General Secretary, Colliery Mazdoor Sabha, Asansol , Distt . Burdwan (W. B.) .

पो. -वही-

Workman थाना-वही-

ग्राम-टाटीसिलवे पो.-वही- थाना-वही- जिला-राँची (झारखण्ड)

REPRESENTATIVES :

जिला-राँची

(झारखण्ड)

Sri P. K. Das , Advocate .

For theManagement :

ग्राम- सरैयटोली

For the Workman:

महतो पति श्री नकुल

27. श्रीमती सुनिता देवी

Sri Nirmalendu Ganguly, Advocate.

पो.- महिलौगं थाना-टाटी-

State: West Bengal सिलवे

Industry: Coal

ग्राम-सरैयटोली पो.-महिलौगं थाना-टाटीसिलवे जिला-राँची (झारखण्ड)

जिला- राँची

Dated 25th August, 2004

(झारखण्ड)

AWARD

-वही-

28. श्रीमती पूर्णी देवी पत्ति श्री महेन्द्र -वही- महतो

नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2004

Inexerciseofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 22012/573/95 - IR (C - II) dated 27-6-97/11-7-97 has beenpleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by the Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 2736.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, ई. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल ( संदर्भ संख्या 43/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012 /573/95- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of J. K. Ropeways of M/ s. ECL in dismissing Sh. Dharma Bhuiyan, Ex-Bucket Manfrom services w.e.f. 21-5-92 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled and from which date ?" New Delhi, the 30th September, 2004

After receipt of the aforesaid order of reference, summons were issued to the respective parties through the Registered Post . In pursuance to the summons both theparties appeared through their representatives and filed their respective written statement in support of their claims.

S.O. 2736. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 43/1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of ECL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004 .

[No. L- 22012 /573 /95 - IR(CM- II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

2. The case of the workman in short as per the written statements is that the workman Dharma Bhuiyan, Ex-Bucket Man of J. K. Ropeway had gone to his relative's house at Sripur after seeking permission from the competent authority but unfortunately he fell ill and was under the treatment at Sripur Colliery Hospital w.e.f. 2-3-1992 to 7-3-1992 . An intimation to this effect was sent to the management by post as there was none in his family to report the facts to the management company at J. K. Ropeway.

PRESENT:

3. The further case of the workman is that after having been declared fit he come to join his duties on Sri Md. Sarfaraz Khan , Presiding Officer 7402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

to the gravity of misconduct proved passed the order of dismissal of the concerned workman which is according to the spirit of the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment .

10-3-1992 but without any rhyme and reason he was not allowed to join his duty inspite of the fact that he was neither suspended nor dismissed from his service. After 13 days , the management issued a chargesheet against the concerned workman vide its letter dated 23-3-1992 under Section 17(1 )(a) , 17 (1 ) (d) and 17(1 ) ( n) of the Model Standing Order of the establishment calling for an explanation of the alleged charges within 48 hours. This act of the management is claimed to be arbitrary, oppressive andvictimising. The allegation of charges were denied and the management turned down the request to allow to join his service.

7. It is deniedby the management that the concerned workman left to his relatives house at Sripur after availing leave from the management and that he fell ill there and he had been treated at Sripur Colliery Hospital from 23-2-1992 to 7-3-1992 . It is further denied that the delinquent had ever intimated his sickness to the management by post. It is lastly prayed that the workman is not entitled to any relief and it may be declared that the action of the management is totally justified according to law.

8. The perusal of the record goes to show that a hearing on the preliminary point was made on 30-6-1998 before then Presiding Officer who having heard both the parties held that no invalidity in the enquiry proceeding was noticed and there was due participation of the delinquent in the enquiry and thereafter the case was fixed forthe final hearing on merit, which was accordingly taken up by me on 25-8-2004 . The final argument was concluded on the same day and the award was reserved.

9.Before entering into the discussion of the merit ofthe case it is necessary to mention the facts admitted by the respective parties.

4. It is also the case of the workman that subsequently the enquiry proceeding was started against him violating all the principles of natural justice and the Enquiry Officer submitted its report at the dictate of the management , which is itself bad in law. The fairness and validity of the Enquiry proceeding has also been challenged as the Medical Certificate submitted by the workman does not find any place in the report and the copy of the document of which has been relied upon by the Enquiry Officer, was not served upon the delinquent , which goes to show something fishy behind it. The workman has further claimed that no second show cause notice was ever served upon the workman before issuing the dismissal order, which is the direct and deliberate violation of the mandate of the Apex Court . The punishment awarded against the workman is also claimed tobe extremely disproportionate to the notice ofthe alleged misconduct which is fit to be set aside and a lenient view after reinstating may kindly be taken.

10. It is the admitted fact that the concerned workman Dharma Bhuiyan was employed under the management as a Bucket Man of J. K. Ropeway and he was issued a chargesheet for being absent from his duty form 23-2-1992 to 7-3-1992 , vide letter dated 23-3-1992 alleging charges under Section 17 (1 ) ( a) , 17 (1 ) ( d) and 17(1 ) (n).

5. Like-wise the case of the management according to its written statement in short is that the present reference is bad in the eye of law and misconceived one . The reference is also claimed to be not maintainable in the Law and the dispute referred does not come under the purview of the definition of Industrial Dispute.

11. It is the further admitted case of the parties that an enquiry proceeding was started against the workman and to that effect an explanation was also submittedby the delinquent and thereby he duly participated in that proceeding.

12. It is also the admitted fact that a medical certificate was submitted by the delinquent to show the reason of his absence during the relevant period which was issued by the Sripur Colliery Hospital.

13. It is also the admitted fact that the fairness , validity and propriety of the enquiry proceeding has not been challenged and the same has been held to be fair and valid.

14. According to the settled principles of law the facts admitted need not be proved . So in view of the said principles I do not think proper to discuss these all facts.

6. The man defence case of the management is that due to the unauthorised absence from duty w.e.f. 23-2-1992 of the workman he was chargesheeted U/S 17(1) (a ) , 17 ( 1 ) (d) and 17 ( 1 ) ( n) of the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment . The replyby way ofexplanation ofchargesheet submitted by the delinquent workman was found to be totally unsatisfactory, so an independent enquiry officer was appointed for holding domestic enquiry into the charges framed against the workman concerned and accordingly the enquiry was conducted in presence of the workman affording all the opportunities to defend his case keeping in view of the principles of natural justice . After holding the workman guilty, the report was submitted to the disciplinary authority by the Enquiry Officer. Thereafter considering all the material facts , documents along with the Enquiry report the concerned competent authority having regard

15. At the very outset I would like to mention here that the management has taken the plea in para 1 of its written statement that the instant reference is bad in the 7403 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

7-3-1992 in favour of the workman concerned . Five sets ofXerox copies of the warning letters issued by the Agent , J. K. Ropeways to the concerned workman for absenting from duty without any information or prior permission on the different dates . All the aforesaid documents filed by either of the parties have not been challenged by either side so their legality and genuineness can't be questioned.

eye of Law and the same does not come under the scope ofthe Industrial Dispute. But the aforesaid issue was not raised and pressed by the management side during the course of hearing of the dispute nor the same has been proved. I do not find any defect in the maintainability of the reference and the facts of the dispute very well comes under the scope of the Industrial Dispute Act which has been rightly referred to this Tribunal by the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour for the adjudication of the same and as such the said points in issue is decided against the management.

18. In view of the above facts , circumstances , and the materials available on the record I find that the workman concerned was absenting from the duty from 23-2-1992 to 10-3-1992 continuously without seeking prior permission and previously too he was warned by the management for an unauthorised absence and as such the concernedworkman has been rightly found guilty for the misconduct by the enquiry officer for which he deserved some punishment by the management .

19.Now the only point to be consideredby the Court is to see as to how for the punishment passed by the management is proportionate to the alleged nature of misconduct proved against the concerned workman.

20. During course of argument it was submitted by the learned counsel of the workman that it is a simple case of an unauthorised absence only for a few days i.e. 17 days and the reason of the same has been sufficiently explained and the sick information was communicated to the management through the post and to that effect documents have been tendered before the enquiry officer who has also appreciated the reasons for his absence during the relevant period . I found force in the argument ofthe learned lawyer in this regard. There is no allegation inthe report that the delinquent was found absent without any intimation and without any satisfactory reason .

16. It transpires from the record that none of the parties has examined any person as oral evidence rather same Xerox Copy of the documents have been filed by the respective parties in support of their case. The workman has filed the Xerox Copy of the receipt of the letter ofunder certificate of posting dated 24-2-1992 sent to the management. The original of which was produced before the enquiry officer. This documents goes to show that the concerned workman had sent the sick information to the management in time. The enquiry officer had kept the original copy of the sick information produced by the delinquent during the enquiry proceeding . The enquiry officer has not whispered a word in his report that the delinquent was absent without any satisfactory reason, rather the reason of the absence of the workman appears to have been found satisfactory. Xerox copy of the application filed by the delinquent to the General Manager about the joining report . Xerox copy of the chargesheet , Xerox copy of the explanation called for by the management in respect of the chargesheet has been filed where the reason of his absence during the period was been explained and information to that effect has been claimed to have been sent by post . Xerox copy of the application addressed to the Medical Superintendent Sripur Area Colliery Hospital requesting to issue confirmation about the sick report of the workman and genuineness of the Medical Certificate issued to the workman has been filed where the Dy. Medical Superintendent , Sripur Area Hospital has given a certificate that i.e. on verification of record it is found that now there is an entry of sick report of Sri Dharma Bhuiyan on 24-2-1992 on the serial No. 305 in the outside sick register. Xerox copy of the enquiry proceeding and the copy of the enquiry report have also been filed by the workman.

21. It was further submitted by the learned lawyer of the workman that the charge of habitual absenteeism can't be taken into consideration as the chapter has been closed and the workman has reaped the consequence for the same and a person can't be punished twice for the same sorts of misconduct . Besides this the attention of the Court was also draw towards the averments of the pleading of the management with regard to the allegation of the habitual absenteeism , when the allegation is not pleaded in the W/S the charge on this Count itself is beyond the scope of law and the extremes penalty can't be imposed having regard to this allegation . The argument was further advanced on the point that no second show cause notice was issued to the workman before passing the order of dismissal against him which is itself a deliberate violation of the mandate of the Apex Court . Admittedly this aspect of the violation of the direction of the Apex Court is vital and prejudicial to the interest of the delinquent.

22. It is well settled principles of law that before imposing punishment of dismissal, it is necessary for the disciplinary authority to consider the family back ground 17. Similarly the management has also filed the Xerox copy of the confidential letter sent by the Dy. Medical Superintendent, Sripur Area Hospital to the Agent, J. K. Ropeway, contradictory his previous report and mentioning that the entry on sick register dated 7-4-1992 seems to be tampered and the signature of the Doctor in the fitness certificate issued to the workman concerned also seems to be forged . Xerox copy of the sick/ fitness certificate issued by the Medical Officer on

3139 G1 /04-40 7404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

(संदर्भ संख्या 79/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/92/92- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 30th September, 2004" economic back ground of the delinquent, length ofservice put in by the employee , his past and other surrounding circumstances including the compelling circumstances for committing the misconduct. The delinquent is a member of Scheduled Castes who is literally and financially very weak and poor who has suffered immense hardship for more than a decade and he had never been gainfully employed anywhere during the period after his dismissal .

S.O. 2737. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 79/93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Khadi and Village Industries Commission and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004.

[No. L -42012/ 92/92- IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI 23.Apart from this when the Model Standing Order applicable to the establishment under Section 27 ( 1 ) (page- 15) provides various minor punishments . I fail to think as to why only maximum punishment available under the said clause should be awarded on the facts of the present case. I am of the view that justice must be tempered with mercy and that the erring workman should be given an opportunity to reform himself and prove to be a loyal and disciplined employee of the management . Any way I am of this view that the punishment of dismissal for an unauthorised leave for a few days under the explained compelling circumstance and with out any ulterior motive and mala fide intention is too harsh a punishment which is totally disproportionate to the misconduct alleged undoubtedly the job of a Bucket Man is not important due to which the industry might have incurred any lose. It is a plain and simple case which should have been dealt with by taking a lenient view by the management . In that view of the matter I think it necessary to modify the penalty imposed by the management to meet the ends of justice.

R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer I. D. No. 79/93 Sh.O. P. Khatri Versus

Khadi and Village Industries Commission AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L-42012/ 92/92- IR (DU) Central Government dt. 30-09-1993 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:-

24.Having considered the above facts circumstances and the discussion made I am satisfied to hold that the punishment imposed by the employer is not at all proper, just and commensurate with the nature and gravity ofthe misconduct proved against the delinquent and as such the impugned order of the punishment by way of dismissal is hereby set aside and the delinquent is directed to be re- instated with the continuity of service. Considering the fact of a long lapse of time before the date of dismissal and reinstatement, and no blame can be put only on the door of the workman, 1 think it appropriate to award 25% per cent of the back wages being payable to the delinquent . Let the award be and the same is passed accordingly. Copies of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour for information and needful .

"Whether the action of the management of Khadi and Village Industries Commission in refusing promotion to Shri O. P. Khatri, UDC at their Delhi Officetothe post of Superintendent at Delhi is just . If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"

MD. SARFARAZ KHAN, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2004

Theworkman applicant has stated in the statement of claim that he is UDC presently posted at State Office, New Delhi as Upper Division Clerk and performing his duties since August , 1975 quite sincerely and honestly. There is no adverse report or remark was never recorded against the workman by the Management .

का. आ. 2737.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार खादी एवं विलेज इण्डस्ट्रीज कमीशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 11, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट

That the Management has already declared the seniority list ofthe Ministerial staff on 31-12-1988 through its proper authority. The workman is entitled to get 7405 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

promotion to the post of Superintendent w.e.f. 1-3-1991 from the date the post was got vacant under State Office, New Delhi .

and his seniority was fixed by the order of the Additional Senior Sub -Judge . The appeal was allowed against the said order and according to the order of the Appellate Court, he was treated to be an employee of All India Cadre and not of Delhi State. His Headquarter is Bombay so he cannot be given the seniority of the Delhi State Cadre and the Hon'ble Court of Additional District Judge has directed the management to place him in his own cadre. As such, the seniority cannot be considered according to the state cadre of Delhi so his seniority was re - fixed and whenhe was senior for appointment for the post of Supdt. , he was given appointment. He is now retired and he has been given promotion so he has not turned up for a long time. From the evidence of the management , oral as well as documentary, this fact is established that the workman applicant was not senior in 1991 to be promoted as Supdt. However, when his seniority was considered on all India basis , he was promoted. As such, the prayer of the workman applicant is liable to be rejected.

The award is replied thus:-

The action of the management of Khadi and Village Industries Commission in refusing promotion to Shri O. P. Khatri UDC at their Delhi Office to the post of Superintendent at Delhi is just . The applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly. Dt. 27-9-2004 R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 2738.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मास मेलिंग यूनिट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं . II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-09-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/158/91- डी. 2 ( बी ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 30th September, 2004 According the Standing Order No. 1408 dt . 24-09-1987 and 1422 dated 19-2-1988 , the workman was automatically entitled to be promoted for the post of Superintendent as per his seniority. He was not promoted w.e.f. 1-3-1991 at the post of Supdt . The action of the management is illegal . The defendant has filed written statement. In the written statement , it has been stated that the applicant's seniority could not be fixed in relation to such employees because he did not belong to any state cadre. His name was carried in the services Board Section which was an All India Cadre . As such , his seniority is to be ascertained on All India Cadre basis . The applicant vide his letter dt. 26-10-1987 indicated that he opted for the Ambala Office. He was not illegible to exercise this option because he did not belong to the unified cadre for ministerial staff. His request was not considered. Subsequently, the ex -cadre post of Shri Khatri at Ambala which was carried in the Services Board Section was abolished and vide order dt. 7-4-1988 , Shri Khatri was asked to report to Bombay on transfer to the present department of the services Board Section. He filed a suit against his transfer to Bombay dated 7-4-1988. This suit came up before the Court of the Additional Senior Sub- Judge , Ambala. The order of transfer was confirmed and itwas directed that the applicant seniority be determined at Ambala. In view of the order of the Sub-Judge , a fresh seniority list was issued on 31-3-1988 vide order dated 16-12-1988 . Accordingly, his seniority was notionally fixed w.e.f. 30-08-1976 and was at Sl . No. 19- A. Vide order dt . 19-1-1989, the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala Cantt allowed the appeal of the management while holding that it was prima facie evident that Shri Khatri was working on an ex-cadre post at Ambala under the Services Board Section Cadre and that an employee working on an ex - cadre post has no legal right to remain on that post and that he can be sent back to his parent office at the discretion of the competent authority. The workman applicant belonged to All India Cadre of the Services Board Section . Thus , he is not entitled for seniority fixation in the Delhi State Cadre as if he belonged to that cadre .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim.

S.O. 2738. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 46/92) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mass Mailing Unit and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 30-09-2004 .

Heard arguments from the side of the management. The workman applicant is not turning up for a long time and it was told that he has retired and he was promoted subsequently according to his seniority.

[No. L -42012/ 158 /91 -D . 2 (B) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer It was pointd out that seniority was fixed on 1-12-1988 and the workman applicant was at Sl . No. 19-A 7406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR - COURT II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

I. D. No. 46/92

Inthe matter of:

Sh . Awadhesh Prasad

Versus

Mass Mailing Unit , Deptt. of Family Welfare

AWARD

and principle of fair play. That the termination of services ofthe workman/ applicant by the management was in utter disregard of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 , and 21 of the Constitution and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this regard. That the applicant/workman has worked with the Management at their various offices like at Nirman Bhawan Awane Ghalib Marg and Bikaner House , as per the order of the management and at their convenience. At the time of termination the applicant/workman was posted and working at the management's office at Bikaner House, New Delhi . That the applicant/workman has always been willing to work with the respondents and has written to this effect at various occasions besides having met personally but the respondent/management failed to act fairly and reinstate the workman/ applicant .

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L-42012/ 158/91 -D2 (B) Central Government dt. 07-05-1992 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Mass Mailing Unit , Deptt. of Family Welfare , Bikaner House , New Delhi in terminating the services of Sh . Awadhesh Prasad, Watchman w.e.f. 21-10-86 isjustified ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to" ?

That having failed to receive any positive response from the management the workman raised the Industrial Dispute before the Asstt . Labour Commissioner, (Central ) New Delhi in Feb. 1991. However the conciliation proceeding failed due to rigid and negative attitude of the management leading to the reference of the said dispute by the competent Govt . That the termination of services of the workman by the management is illegal , unconstitutional arbitrary and bad in the eyes of law. That the applicant is entitled for reinstatement with full back wages and with continuity in services.

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the applicant was appointed/engaged by the management as daily rated workman on muster roll on 3-6-85 through employment exchange Kamla Market , New Delhi . That the workman/ applicant has been performing his duties as chowkidar under the management since the date of his employment and he was paid daily wages after completion of a month on muster roll @ Rs . 15.70 per day. That the workman/ applicant had been in continuous service of the management without any complaint against him since his engagement on 3-6-85 . That however the services of the workman were arbitrarily and without notice terminated by Res . No. 1 and his Section Officer being Sh . R. N. Saxena/ Sh . N. S. Tanwar as they were those days on 21-10-86 when he reported for duties and was not taken on duties . Details of salary drawn and record of work are available with the Resp. 1. That there had been sufficient work under Resp . 1 as well as Resp. 2. However the workman /applicant was replaced by contract Labour without any justifiable cause by the management to disentitle the workman/ applicant as regards future service benefit which might have accrued to the applicant/ workman . That the applicant/workman had been in continuous service of the management and had completed more than 240 days in the preceding calendar year . However the management terminated his services in utter disregard of the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act

The management/respondent has filed WS. In the WS it has been stated that the statement of claim is not maintainable as the workman failed to file the same with the Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the order of reference and also failed to forward a copy of such statement to the respondents involved in the dispute as required under rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central ) Rules , 1957. That the statement of claim has not been verified and/ or supported by affidavit at all and thus it is not proper in the eye of law and is not maintainable. The workman should not be given any relief and the statement of claim may be dismissed with cost to the management . That inordinate and unexplained delay or laches is by itself a ground to refuse relief to the workman. It is submitted that if a person entitled to a relief chooses to remain silent for a long time he thereby gives rise to a reasonable belief in the mind of others that he is not interested in claiming that relief. The claim is highly belated and there is no cogent explanation for inordinated delay of 4 years in filing the application for reinstatement after leaving the service in October, 1986 . It is further submitted that the workman should have approached the concerned authorities for relief within a reasonable period although no limitation period couldbe fixed . That no attempt has been made by the workman to explain why he chose to be silent for so long if he too was interested in being reinstated and had not abandoned his claim if any. It is further submitted that if the workman's 7407 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

contention is upheld that lapse of any length of time is of no consequence in the present case it would mean that any such workman can choose to wait even till he attains the age of superannuation and then assail the termination ofhis services and claim monetary benefits for the entire period on the same ground. The action in the instant case is much too belated and should not be entertained by the Hon'ble Tribunal . To hold otherwise would result in grave consequences for the management.

that in case, the workman has put in two years of service, as casual worker with 206 days of service during each period, as against usual 240 days , such casual workers may be considered for regular appointment to the posts . Inview of this letter also, the workman applicant deserves to be regularised as he has put in two years service . In case notional break is not considered, he has put in more than 206 days in 1985 and 1986. The management cannot ignore the regularisation of such workman . As such , according to the letter of Ministry of Home of 1984, the workman deserves to be regularised. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case , a daily wager or temporary employee has worked for more than 240 days and he has not been given retrenchment compensation and notice, he deserves to be regularised from the date of his initial appointment . The law of limitation is not applicable in ID Act, 1947.

Ithas been further stated that the applicant was employed from June , 1985 to August 1986 on temporary basis . In 1985 , he worked for 186 days and during the calendar year 1986 , he worked for 275 days . There was no employer and employee relation. MMU is not an industry and the court has got no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the matter. The work was entrusted to a private agency. The Industrial Dispute Act is not applicable in this case. There is no question of violation of provisions of that Act . His services were purely temporary and his employment was casual . When the work was given to the other agencies, he was removed from service.

In view of the decision of the Bangalore Water Supply ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court , Mass Mailing Unit is carrying on human activities and the work is of a perennial nature as it has been given to some other out sourcing agency. As such , the workman has worked under the control of the management. In case , the workman's case is covered under the ID Act, notice and compensation ismust. No notice and compensation has been paid . The workman deserves to be regularised.

The workman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder , he has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras ofthe statement of claim. In his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim.

Both the parties have examined the witnesses and the witnesses have been cross -examined .

The workman is a manual labour so it cannot be deemed that he was sitting idle. He must be doing some work and he filed the case after a long gap . In the facts and circumstances of this case , he should be regularised with only 20% wages from the date of termination of his service in view of his delay and latches also .

The reference is replied thus :---

Heard arguments from both the sides . It was submitted from the side of the workman that it is an admitted case of the management that the workman worked from 3-6-1985 to 21-10-1986. It has been further admitted by the management that the workman has worked for 186 days in 1985 and 275 days in 1986. As such the workman has worked for more than 240 days .

The action of the management of Mass Mailing Unit, Deptt. of Family Welfare, Bikaner House, New Delhi in terminating the services of Sh . Awadhesh Prasad , Watchman w.e.f. 21-10-86 is not justified. The workman is entitled to be regularised from 21-10-1986 with 20% backwages. In case, the workman is not regularised within one month after publication of the award, he will get 10% interest on the entire back wages when the same became due till the date ofpayment.

Itwas further submitted from the side of the workman that the management is an industry. It is an undertaking of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare . There is district officer ofMass Mailing Unit so the MMU is anundertaking of the Ministry of Health. As such , this undertaking is an industry and this Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the matter.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt. 24-9-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2739. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर ( उ.प्र. ) के पंचाद ( संदर्भ Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that in 1979 , a letter was issued regarding sanction of peons . Inthat letter, it has been mentioned in para (iii ) that broken period of service rendered as casual employees shall be taken into account for purpose of regularisation in regular establishment provided that one stretch of service is for more than six months . According to the circular letter of 1979 , in case the workmen have worked for more than six months , their cases will be considered for regularisation . Circular issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairsdt. 26-10-1984 has specified 7408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] संख्या 141/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (k) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

[सं. एल-12011/24/99-आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004

3. The workman has examined himself on oath. On behalf of the management ocular evidence has not been produced but the management has filed inquiry report and also other relevant documents which have been admitted by the workman . The workman has also filed certaindocuments in support of his case.

4.Heard the parties at length . The management has also filed written arguments .

S.O. 2739.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 141/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Kanpur (U. P. ) as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Bank of India , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 04-10-2004.

[No. L- 12011/24/ 99 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM -LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR, U. P.

Industrial Dispute No. 141 of 99

In the matter of dispute between:

5. The workman in the present reference has been held proved for the charges levelled against him by the management after an inquiry initiated and conducted by the management in which the workman has been given full opportunity to defend and the workman has also examined its witness in support of his defence against the charges levelled against him. The workman was also given an opportunity of being heard personally and the disciplinary authority having been satisfied that the findings of the inquiry are sufficient to impose punishment, imposed punishment on the workman. The workman feeling aggrieved with the punishment filed an appeal before the appellate authority who reduced the sentence awarded to the workman by withholding to only one increment instead of two increments of pay as given by the disciplinary authority.

The Assistant General Secy, Central Bank Staff Association , 13/11 , Sheo Nagar Colony, Allahapur, Allahabad

AND

CentralBank of India, The Regional Manager, CBI Regional Office , Lanka Varanasi

AWARD

1. Central Government, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , vide Notification No. L - 12011 / 24/ 99 /IR (B - II), dated 23-6-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India Regional Office , Varanasi is justified in imposing the punishment on Sh. A. N. Pandey, Clerk ? If not, what relief is the said workman entitled to ?"

6. Initial question to be considered, therefore, is as to whether the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was fair and proper. In this regard the workman's only objection is that no opportunity to defend has been given. The statement of the workman is far from truth as is apparent from going through the record. The workman no where was denied opportunity to defend himselfexcept that the service of an Advocate was denied to the workman to defend himself as per the bipartite settlement. The workman admittedly was defended by another authorised representative during the inquiry and he has also adduced the defence witness to defend his charges. Having gone through the entire disciplinary proceeding there is nothing on record to even suspect slightly about the unfairness of the inquiry at all. The inquiry has been held well within the meaning of law after following set norms of principles of natural justice and equity. The charges have been established beyond any suspicion and also there is nothing on record to disagree with the finding of the enquiry officer against the workman. The preliminary issue is therefore held against theworkman holding that the domestic inquiry conducted by the inquiry officer against the workman was fair and proper and does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality nor it is against the principles of natural justice.

2. The claim of the workman Sri A. N. Pandey has been filed through Asstt. General Secy. , Central Bank Staff Association , Allahabad. A written Statement refuting the claim of the petition has also been filed on behalf of the management of Central Bank of India, Varanasi which has also prayed for decision after framing preliminary issue detailed in para 148 of the written statement through which the jurisdiction of the tribunal has also been challenged and also the maintainability of the industrial

7. Having arrived at a conclusion as stated above there is also no ground to interfere with the punishment 7409 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 57/2000

BETWEEN

in respect of the charges levelled and proved against the workman and it can also not be accepted that the punishment so awarded is not commensurate with the failings of the workman.

The Zonal Manager ,

IndianBank ,

Zonal Office,

Chittoor Road,

......Management

Ernakulam.

8.Before parting with it may also be concluded that the present industrial dispute has been prosecuted through the Union which too is against the bipartite settlement and strictly speaking it cannot be accepted as an industrial dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (k) of the Act .

(By Sri . P. Krishnan Kutty Nair, Advocate, Trivandrum)

AND

9. For this reasons also no award can be passed in favour of the workman.

Sri . S. Sanjeev,

TC. 42/1046 , Ushus Rose Lane No. 62 , Vallakkadavu P.O. ,

10. For the reasons stated above the workman is held not entitled for any relief whatsoever against the management of Central Bank of India pursuant to the present reference .

Workman

Trivandrum

SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding Officer

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

The Government of India, by Order No. L- 12012/ 43/2000/ IR (B - II ) dated 19-7-2000, have referred this industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

The issues for adjudication are following :

का. आ. 2740.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कोलम, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether there existed any employee -employer relationship between the ' Personal Drivers ' engaged by the executives of the Indian Bank and the managementment of Indian Bank ? If so , whether the denial of employment of Sri . S. Sanjeev, Personal Driver w.e.f. 30-9-1999 is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? " [सं. एल-12012/43/2000- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 4th October , 2004

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank in not considering Sri . S. Sanjeev, Personal Driver in any post of sub - staff as a prevalent precedent in the bank is justified ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?"

S.O. 2740. In pursuancersuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 57/ 2000) of the Industrial Tribunal Kollam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the inanagement of Indian Bank and their workman, received by the Central Government on 04-10-2004.

[No. L- 12012/43/2000 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, KOLLAM

(Dated, this the 3rd day of September 2004)

PRESENT:

2. The workman involved in this reference Sri . S. Sanjeev has stated that he has worked as Personal Driver of several Executive Officers of the management bank w.e.f. 14-7-1993 to 13-9-1999 and he was denied employment w.e.f. 13-9-1999 on the closure of Zonal Inspectorate of the management at Trivandrum. Though he has made several representations to the bank, his request was not considered. According to him he is the onlyearning member of his family and as a result of denial of employment he is not in a position to maintain his family of wife and two children. It is further stated that the management bank has appointed several personal drivers as permanent driver as well as sub - staff in the bank. He has also stated the names of some of such persons. It is also his case that as per the circulars of the bank dated 25-5-1989 and 4-7-1996 he is entitled to get appointment as permanent driver . On the basis of such SRI . C. N. SASIDHARAN, Industrial Tribunal 7410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] circulars his service records were sent to the zonal office but no action has been taken. According to him the action of management in denying him employment as well as non consideration of his name for appointment as sub- staff, are highly illegal and unjustified. His claim is for reinstatement in service with all benefits .

driver of Executive of the bank . Admittedly he was not served with any appointment order or dismissal order from the bank . In the absence of any evidence that he was appointed by the management bank and paid salary, it cannotbe held that there existed any employer employee relationship between him and the management. There is also no evidence of any master and servant relationship between them. That being the position the present dispute raised by the workman cannot be considered as an industrial dispute as defined under Sec . 2(k) of the Act . Hence this reference is not maintainable in law.

6. Issue No. 1

3. The management bank opposes the claim of the workman . It is stated that the workman Sri . Sanjeev is not a workman and hence the dispute raised by him is not an ' industrial dispute' as defined under Sec. 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Hence this reference is not maintainable . The workman was not an employee of the management bank and he was never engaged on permanent basis or casual basis by the management. His statement that he had worked for a continuous period of six years in the bank is absolutely false . There existed no employer employees relationship between the management and the workman and hence there is no cause ofactiontobe redressed by this Tribunal . The management has not terminated the service of the workman . Certain officers of the bank are provided with car and it is for the officers to decide to engage a driver or not . If they engage a personal driver they are re -imbursed certain amount of expenses in this regard but the bank do not stipulate terms and conditions for selection or appointment of personal drivers . The bank do not have disciplinary control over such personal drivers and there is no privity of contract between the bank and such drivers . Hence such personal drivers do not have any right to claim regular appointment in the bank. The workman has not been paid any wages or salary by the bank . He was not employed permanently as personal driver of the Zonal Inspectorate, Trivandrum and there is no such post also . The bank has already stopped fresh appointments from the year 1996. Sub - staff/ drivers are appointed only against the vacancies declared and appointments are made by following the well settled selection process in the bank. The management denies all other allegations made by the workman against the bank. According to the management the workman is not entitled to get any relief.

4. The workman examined himself as WW1 and Exts . WI to W2 have been marked on his side . The manager of the management bank examined himself as MWI and Exts . M1 to M4 have been marked on the side of the management.

According to the workman he was employed as personal driver of several Executive Officers of the management bank from 14-7-1993 and was denied employment from 30-9-1999 as a result of the closure of zonal directorate of the bank at Trivandrm. He has no case that he was appointed by the management and was paid salary or wages . Of course the management has admitted the engagement of the workman as personal driver of Executive Officer of the bank but denied his claim that he had continuous service of six years . In response to Ext . W1 letter the Asstt . General Manager of the bank, Trivandrum has forwarded the service details of personal drivers engaged by the officer of bank and in which the details of the workman are stated. As per that his initial engagement was on 14-7-1993 as personal driver. But there is no evidence regarding the date of closure of the zonal directorate of the bank though according to the workman the denial of employment was w.e.f. that date viz ; 30-9-1999 there is no evidence on record to show that he was appointed or paid salary by the management bank. There is also no evidence to the effect that there was any control or supervision by the management bank over the personal drivers including the workman. The workman has also not made any attempt tocall for any records from the management bank to prove that he was appointed or paid salary by the management bank. There is also no evidence to show that he was denied employment by the bank. In the absence of any such evidence it cannot be held that there existed any employer employee relationship between the management and the personal drivers engaged by the executives of the management bank. Therefore the question of denial of employment of the workman does not arise at all. Hence the workman is not entitled to get any relief under this issue.

7. Issue No. 2

5. The management has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that this reference is not maintainable . According to the management Sri. Sanjeev is not a workman and hence the present dispute is not an 'industrial dispute ' as defined in the Act. The definite case of the management is that the workman was never appointed by the bank in any capacity and not paid salary orwages at any point of time. That is not proved otherwise also. Even according to the workman he was personal

The further case of the workman is that the management has not considered his name for appointment in any post of sub - staff as there existed such a precedent in the bank. He has also pointed out the names of certain persons appointed in that capacity who were earlier worked as special drivers. But there is no evidence showing their 7411 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Ext. M2 . Photocopy of the circular issued by the management bank dated 18-8-1994.

Ext.M3 . Photocopy of letter addressed to the zonal manager Ernakulam from the Central office of the management bank dated 14-11-1995.

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2741. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ोदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 79/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/49/98- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004

S.O. 2741. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 79/99) of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Kanpur (U.P. ) as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofBank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04-10-2004 .

period ofservice as personal drivers before their absorption as sub - staff . The management has also admitted the prevalence ofsuch a practice . But the question is whether the workman is qualified and eligible to be considered for such appointments . The workman has placed much reliance on Ext. W2 circular dated 18-8-1994 of the management bank in support of his claim. As per Ext. W2 a settlement has been signed on 23-7-1994 which provides as one time measure that all the personal drivers who have completed minimum five years uninterrupted service in the capacity of personal drivers will be considered for the post of permanent sub- staff along with the temporary sub - staff taking into account their date of initial engagement for the purpose of seniority. There cannot be any dispute that on the date of the said settlement the workman has not completed five years continuous service . Ext . M2 is another circular dated 14-11-1995 in this regard and as per that a personal driver engaged on orbefore 23-7-1994 could be considered for appointment topermanent cadre on completion of uninterrupted service of five years . The workman has not completed five years service as on 23-7-1994 or 14-11-1995. As stated earlier there is no evidence at all to show that the workman has completed five years uninterrupted service as personal driver w.e.f. the date of initial appoint viz; 14-7-1993 . Therefore he is not eligible to claim the benefit provided by the bank as per Exts. W2 and M2 circulars . Hence the action of management is not considering the workman in any post ofsub -staff is fullyjustified and he is not entitled to get any relief under this issue as well.

[No. L- 12011/49/98 - IR(B - II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

8. For the foregoing discussions , an award is passed holding that the workman is not entitled to get any relief in this reference .

C.N. SASIDHARAN , Industrial Tribunal

Witness examined on the side of the Workman

BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 79 of 99 WW1 .

Sri . S. Sanjeev

In the matter of dispute between:

Witness examined on the side of the Management

Shri Munna Lal Gupta

MW1.

Sri . A. Subramaniya Pillai

Documents marked on the side of the Workman

General Secretary Bank of Baroda Staff Association (U.P. ) 15/222 A Civil Lines , Kanpur

Service details ofthe workman Sri . Sanjeev

Ext. W1.

AND

Ext. W2 .

The Assistant General Manager

Photocopy of the circular issued by the management bank dated 18-8-1994

Documents marked on the side of the Management

Bank of Baroda Gumti No. 5 , Kanpur

AWARD

Ext. Ml .

1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi, vide Notification No. L - 12011/49/98 - IR (B.II) dated Photocopy of request of the workman submitted to the zonal manager of the management bank for permanent posting as driver.

3139 G1/04-41 7412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 19-4-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

staged dharna on relevant day and did not work on the day as per their contractual obligations cannot be permitted to demand the wages which they have never earned. No other point has been raised on behalf of the workmen in support of their contention.

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in deducting wages of the workman S/ Sh . Munna Lal Gupta, Anil Mishra , Raja Ram, M.C. Mishra , P.K. Talwar and Sri Rajneesh Gupta of the Association for sitting on Dharna on 5-11-96 is justified ? If not to what relief the said workmen are entitled ?

6. In the light of above the award is answered against the workmen and it is held that the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in deducting the wages ofthe workmen of the Association for sitting on Dharna on5-11-96 is fully justified. The workers are therefore, not entitled to any relief.

Dated : 30-9-2004

SURESH CHANDRA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

2. The admitted facts giving rise to the present reference for adjudication is that admittedly the office bearers of the Association named in the schedule of reference order above sat on Dharna in following a call of their Association on 5-11-96 . The workers were denied wages for the day in question on account of dharna done by the workmen . The facts are not disputed by either party by way of their respective pleadings .

3. None of the parties adduced any oral or documentary evidence in support of their respective claims and in rebuttal .

का. आ. 2742.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडिया सिक्युरिटी प्रैस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, नासिक के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

4. Heard the authorised representatives for both the parties and also perused the reference received for adjudication and also the claims and rival claims by the contesting parties.

[सं. एल-16011/6/99- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 4th October , 2004

S.O. 2742.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Labour Court, Nashik as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of India Security Press and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 4-10-2004.

[No. L - 16011 /6/99 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SMT. C.A. NATHANI , PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, NASHIK

Reference ( IDA) No. 57/199

BETWEEN

General Manager,

India Security Press.

Nashik Road , Maharashtra

.... First Party

AND

Shri M. B. Naik ,

Madhu Kunj . 5 B. Suyog Co - op. Housing Society, Shikharewadi , Nashik Road, Nashik (Maharashtra) .

5. The only argument led on behalf of the workman is that the management has been paying wages earlier even for the days when the workmen did not work and staged dharua . It is pointed out that in the absence of any evidence to this effect the arguments put on behalf ofthe workmen has got no force and cannot be accepted. Further the attention was drawn by the workınan towards the reply filedby the management against the claim petition which runs that past mistake cannot be made precedent to seek exemption as given in para no . 13 of the written statement filed on behalf of the management. The guidelines of the instructions issued by the management in respect of strike and agitation chapter 37 issued by Bank of Baroda clearly lays down that the principle of no work no pay should uniformally apply. Even where an employee in breach of his contract for part of the day he will not carn wages for full day subject to the condition that the bank does not acquiesces in the breach by taking work from such employee for the rest of the day. The later part of the instruction is not applicable in the present case and in a no work no pay situation question of payment of wages docs not arise as the employee had not earned wages . The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India was pleased to held in a case Bank of India Vs. T. S. Kalawal reported in 1990 Part II LLJ page 39 that illegality or legality of strike has nothing todo with the liability for deduction of the wages and even if the strike was legal the bank was fully entitled to deduct it. The principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is fully applicable on the facts of the present case and it cannot be held that the workmen who

... Second Party 7413 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

PRESENT :

Smt . C. A. Nathani , Judge

APPEARANCES :

be considered under Section 33 -C (2) of the I.D. Act and therefore application was not maintained. The second party again requested the Assistant Labour Commissioner to intervene in the matter. The matter was not settled. Hence, the reference .

Mrs. U. S. Patil, A.G.P. for first party Shripad Chaphekar Advocate for second party,

3. The first party submitted the written statement atEx. C-2 and raised following defence:

AWARD

(23-8-2004)

This is a reference sent to this Court under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the I.D.A. ) by the Govt. of India, Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi .

2. Shortly stated the second party's case is as under:

The post of Sr. Photographer (journeyman) is higher scale category and is purely selection grade . No Government servant can claim promotion to higher post as a matter of right. The Manager (Designs ) who is immediate head of Studio where the second party was workingwas required to look after the work and duties of photographer Special Grade - A. The photograhers were required to work one stage above and one stage below temporarilywhen required. There was nothing wrong with head of section i.e. Manager (Designs ) to ask the second party to look after the work of Sr. Photographer Special Grade-A in addition to his own duties which was a stage above . That was a stop gap arrangement . It will not make the second party to claim promotion with retrospective effect from 1-11-1986. The second party was asked to do the worktemporarily in order to run the administration smoothly. The recommendations of the D.P.C. are advisory in nature and should be duly approved by the appointing authority. In the instant case, the proceedings of D.P.C. had not been approved by appointing authority and thus the recommendations of the said D.P.C. remained only recommendations . These recommendations have no legal effect or do not confer any right to the person who is recommended in higher post . The second party was granted promotion w.e.f. 14-12-1994 . The promotion cannot be granted with retrospective effect. As per the rules where a Government Servant is formally appointed to hold full charge of the duties of a higher post in the same office as his own and in the same cadre of promotion in addition to his ordinary duties , he shall be allowed the pay admissible to him, if he is appointed to officiate in the higher post . In the instant case , the second party was not promotedto officiate in the higher grade , therefore, he has no right to claim for promotion for higher grade and consequently the pay scale of higher post .

4. The following issues are framed at Ex. C -6by my Id. predecessor .

1. Whether the action of the management of the first party in not promoting the IInd party w.e.f. 1-11-86 in the scale of Rs . 1400-2300 was legal and justified ?

2. Whether the IInd party is entitled to the reliefs as prayed for in the statement of claim ?

3. What award ?

The second party was working as photographer Class II in D- 2 grade from 19-1-1972 . He was promoted as Photographer Class 1 in D - 1 grade in the pay scale of Rs . 1320-2040 from 1-10-1973 . On 1-4-1986 Sr. Photographer Special Grade -A (journeyman ) in the scale of Rs . 1400-2300 became vacant due to retirement of Shri R. R. Kadvekar. On the retirement of Shri Kadvekar, the second party was asked to do the work ofjourneyman in the scale of Rs . 1400-2300 by the order of Manager (designs ) dated 1-4-1986. Even though Shri B. M. Gangurde was promoted in place of Shri Kadvekar, Shri B. M. Gangurde retired on 31-10-1986 and the post again became vacant from 1-11-1986 . The second party continued in this post w.e.f. 1-11-1986 . The second party was not granted promotion in the post of Sr. Photographer Class I. He was not paid with the difference ofthe scale ofRs . 1320-2040 and Rs . 1400-2300 of Sr. Photographer . The Departmental Promotion Committee (D.P.C. ) also recommended the name of second party for promotion to the post of Sr. Photographer in the scale of Rs . 1400-2300 . The appointing authority had not accepted or given effect to the recommendations of D.P.C. As per the procedure, the appointing authority has to submit such cases to the next higher authorities and seek orders . The appointing authority has not followed the procedure and simply denied the promotion as well as wages in higher grade . The second party had made representations about the promotion but none of his representation was replied . Being aggrieved, the second party raised industrial dispute with the Assistant Labour Commissioner on 23-11-1995 , but no relief was given . However, the Asstt . Labour Commissioner has suggested the second party to submit his claim under Section 33 -C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. to the Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal . Accordingly the claim was submitted, but the judgement went against the second party on the ground that claims under existing rights can 7414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 / KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (i )] 5. My findings to the above issues are as under:--

1. The action of the management of the first party in not promoting the second partyw.e.f. 1-11-1986 in the scale of Rs . 1400-2300 was łegal and justified ?

2. As per final order .

3. As per final order.

REASONS

6. Prior to taking up the issues for discussion , 1 prefer to have short account of the evidence led by the parties.

followed by the first party in the case of promotion. He admitted that the rule as mentioned in Swami's Establishment & Administration are followed by the first party. The said witness when referred with Rule No. 16.3 ofSwami's Establishment and Administration , had tried to clarify that this rule pertains to the appointment of Sr. Class I officer by the President of India and not for other lower post. He has stated that there are other rules to be followed for rejecting the proposals for lower posts . It is significant to note that the first party has not produced for rejecting the proposals of D.P.C. for lower post . As he admitted that , Swami's Establishment & Administration is referred for Procedure in Party No. 1, therefore, it has to be taken that the rules which are applicable are as mentioned in Swami's Establishment and Administration . I have gone through Chapter No. 43 of Swami's Establishment & Administration which is for the rules to be observed in the cases of promotion . As per this rule, the promotions are to be made on the basis of D.P.C.'s recommendations . The same is the admitted fact in this case also as the witness for the first party has admitted that, there used to D.P.C. meetings to recommend the promotions of the employees . In such circumstances , the recommendations of D.P.C. has to be considered, 7. In oral evidence , the second party examined himself and no other witness . Likewise first party examined its Administrative Officer Shri Ramchandra Narsinha Murti and no other witness . The second party produced order issued by the Manager (Designs ) of first party on 1-4-1986 regarding allocation of additional duties of Sr. Photographer to the second party at Annexure A (Ex . U-6 ), minutes of the meeting of D.P.C. held on 9-7-87 at Annexure B. Statement of claim letter ofAsstt. Labour Commissioner, Pune dated 4-10-1996 at Annexure D and proforma to maintain the record of working in the higher grade at Ex . U-7 .

8. The first party produced list of duties of Sr. Photographer at Annexure A and Copy of the order of judgement ofCentral Govt . Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai .

13. The second party has produced copy of minutes ofthe D.P.C. held on 9-5-1987 . It bears clear terms of the recommendations for the name of second party to consider hispromotion from 1-11-1986. Thus , it is clear that D.P.C. had recommended the second party's promotion from 1-11-1986,

9. As to issue No. 1 & 2 :

There is no dispute that the second party was discharging the duties of Sr. Photographer Class I Grade Awhen he was designated as Photographer Class Il in D- 2 grade since 1-4-1986. He was promoted as Sr. Photographer Class 1 Grade -A on 14-12-1994 . Admittedly the post of Sr. Photographer became vacant from 1-11- 1986. The dispute under reference is only restricted whether the promotion which was granted on 14-12-1994 be given effect from 1-11-1986 or not .

14. First party has come up with the case that the post of Sr. Photographer is of Selection Grade , the promotion is not a matter of right . I do agree with the contentions raised by the first party that the post of Sr. Photographer is of Selection Grade . However , the procedure for accepting or rejecting the recommendations ofD.P.C. can be same for both the posts either of selection grade or of non - selection grade . No doubt in the case of selection grade post , the promotion is not a matter of right , however, denial of promotion cannot be said legal and justified when it is without any reason .

10. The second party has stated that the D.P.C. had recommended his name for promotion on 9-7-1987 . In support of his claim, he has produced the copy of recommendations of D.P.C. which is placed on record at Annexure B.

11. The first party has not disputed the recommendations of the D.P.C. In such circumstances , it has to be seen what are the effects of recommendations of D.P.C.

12. The second party relied upon Rule No. 16.4.3 as is mentioned in Swami's Establishment and Administration, the extract of which is placed by him on record at Annexure C. The first party's witness Shri Ramchandra Murti was asked about the procedure to be

15. In the present case , the D.P.C. had recommended the second party's name on 9-5-1987 . The first party had issued letter on 1-4-1986 while allocating the work of Sr. Photographer that his name will be proposed in the D.P.C. for the post of Sr. Photographer Special Grade-A, after retirement of Shri B.M. Gangurde , Admittedly the said Shri B.M. Gangurde retired on 31-10-1986 and the second party continued to work even after his retirement. Thus , the first party had expressed its view of the eligibility of the promotion of second party while allocating the work of Sr. Photographer on 1-4-1986 . The recommendations of D.P.C. also came in favour of the second party when the meeting was held . It 7415 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

to follow the time schedule to recommendations for approval to A. C. C. Thus, the first party was in total failure offollowing the procedure in respect of recommendations ofD.P.C. in the case of second party. Such action cannot be considered legal and justified.

is significant to note that the first party has not given any reason for not accepting the recommendations of D.P.C. Itmay be even said that the first party had not even taken any action to show that it had, noticed the recommendations of the D.P.C. As per Rule 16.4.3 if the appointing authority does not accept recommendations of the D.P.C. , it shall submit papers to the next higher authorities with its own recommendations . Here in this case, nothing is on record to show that the appointing authority either accepted or refused to accept the recommendations of the D.P.C. As per Rule 16.4.3 it was binding on the appointing authority to accept the recommendations of D.P.C. or submit the papers to the next higher authorities with its recommendations . The appointing authority failed to submit the papers to the next higher authorities with its own recommendations. Thus, the first party failed to follow the procedure .

18. It has been vehemently submitted on behalf of the first party that the second party was put in charge of Sr. Photographer for time gap arrangement . According to it, it was temporary arrangement. It is significant to note that , the second party was kept in charge of Sr.Photographer which fell vacant on 1-11-1986 . He was promoted on 14-12-1994. The period about 7 years cannot be in any case said temporary or a time gap arrangement. No doubt the superiors have right to get the work done of one grade above and one grade below of the employees post, however, such arrangement against clear vacancy cannot be stretched for years together. In the present case there was not only clear vacancy for which the second partywas asked to work as additional charge , but his name was also recommended for that post by D.P.C. In such circumstances , the action of first party in not acting upon the recommendations of D.P.C. in time cannot be said to bejustified.

16. It is significant to note that the procedure provides three months ' time limit either to accept or reject the recommendations of D.P.C. Rule No. 16.5.1 of Swami's Establishment and Administration is very specific for that purpose. I would like to reproduce the same, which runs as under:-

19. I would like to make it clear that the second party'spromotion was recommended in the meeting of D.P.C. on 9-5-87. The period of 3 months is provided as per the rules for accepting or rejecting the recommendations . The post of Sr. Grade requires approval . Had the approval made in time of 3 months , at the most it would have accepted or rejected in further 4 months ? Had it been rejected, the second party would have got opportunity of legal action at that time, therefore , the notional date of promotion has to be taken as 1-1-1988 ?

"Incases excepting those which require the approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet the appointing authority should take a decision either to accept or disagree with the recommendations of the D.P. C. within a time limit of three months (from the date of the D.P.C. meeting or the date of communication of the UPSC's approval to the panel , where such approval is required) . Where the appointing authority proposes to disagree with the recommendations, the relevant papers should be submitted by the appointing authority to the next higher authority with its own recommendations by the expiry of the period of three months. In those cases in which the UPSC is associated with the DPC and the appointing authority proposes to disagree with the recommendations of the DPC, the case should be forwarded to the Establishment Officer in the Department of Personnel and training for placing the matter before the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet as soon as possible and , in any case, not later than three months from the date on which the validity ofthe panel commences ."

20. Here in this case , the first party neither accepted the recommendations nor submitted it for further approval of higher authorities . The fact cannot be neglected that the second party is fighting for his rights since last many years .He approached to Assistant Labour Commissioner. Assistant Labour Commissioner advised him to approach Central Government Industrial Tribunal . Accordingly he approached to Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal . Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal has not considered the claim for want of existing rights . Then he approached to Assistant Labour Commissioner where from the reference has come to this Court . The Complainant had worked for 7years for the promotional post , while he was designated a rank below. Admittedly, he was not granted with any monetary benefits . In all such circumstances , the action ofnot granting promotion, the notional date which I have taken 1-1-1988 is therefore not justified.

21. The second party was appointed on the scale of Rs. 1320-2040 . I have taken his date of notional promotion 1-1-1988 . Had he been promoted on 1-1-1988 , 17. Here in this case both the 1d. counsels for the parties relied on the book of Swami's Establishment & Administration for the procedure to be followed for promotion of the employees of the first party. The xerox copy of Chapter 53 has been provided by the first party. As per Rule No. 16.5.2 the time limit has to be followed even in the cases when approval of A.C.C. is required to give effect to the recommendations of D.P.C. Nothing is on record to show that, the first party was careful enough 7416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

circumstances, it can be well said that the second party is a workman within the meaning of section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

23. As 1 mentioned in foregoing paras, the action of first party in not promoting the second party from 1-1-1988 is not legal and justifiable, the second party can be granted with only monetary relief, therefore, I hold that he is entitled to the difference of 2 scalesfrom 1-1-1988 to 13-12-1994 .

he would have got the pay scale ofRs . 1400-2300 ? The second party is now retired from the services . Now only monetary benefits can be granted to him. I am therefore. ofthe opinion that, he can be granted difference in 2 scales, which he was getting and which he sought to have got . He was getting the payment in the scale of Rs . 1320- 2040. He ought to have got the scale of Rs. 1400-2300 . The actual salary and the slab where he was not before the Court . I therefore hold that he is entitled to get whatever actual salary drawn and difference in the scale ofRs . 1400-2300 .

24. In the light of above discussion, the issue Nos. 1 & 2 are answered accordingly.

25. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order.

ORDER

1. The reference is partly allowed.

22. The first party had tried to bring evidence on record in order to show that, the second party was not a workman . It witness Ramchandra Murti has stated that, second party was not a workman. In order to show the same, the first party has produced the duty list of Sr. Photographer Grade- 1 at Annexture A. It is significant to note that , as per Section 2 ( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a workman means :-

2. It is hereby declared that the action of the first party in not promoting the second party from 1-1-1988 is illegal and unjustified.

3. The second party is entitled to the difference of wages drawn and which he was entitled to (Rs . 1400- 2300) from1-1-1988 to 13-12-1994 .

"any person ( including an apprentice) employed in any industry todo any manual , unskilled, skilled, operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched inconnection with , as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-

4. The first party is accordingly directed to pay to the second party the difference of wages drawn and which he was entitled to (Rs . 1400-2300) from 1-1-1988 to 13-12-1994 within two months from the date of publication of the award.

(i)

(ii)

5. Parties to bear their own costs ..

SMT . C. A. NATHANI, Presiding Officer Nashik Date : 23-8-2004

(iii ) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

(iv) who , being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or exercises, either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature .

का. आ. 2743.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, शुगर केन ब्रीडिंग इंस्टीट्यूट प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई ( संदर्भ संख्या 83/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को4-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/242/2002- आई.आर. ( सीएम -11 ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004

Admittedly the second party was not the person of managerial category. So as to supervisory category is concerned, it is significant to note that the first party has come with the case that the second party was bound to follow the instructions of Manager (designs) to work one rank above or one rank below. Thus , the first party has come with the case that the second party was under the supervision of Manager-designs . Ultimately, it can be said that the second party does come in supervisory category. In such circumstances, the duty list produced by the first party does not exclude the second party's work from the area of workman . More so , Annexure B to written statement also does not bring any supervisory nature of work to be discharged by the second party. In such

S.O. 2743. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 83/ 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Sugar Cane 7417 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :-

Breeding Institute, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04-10-2004.

[No. L-42012/242/2002 - IR( CM - II) ] N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 10th August, 2004

PRESENT :

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 83/2003

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Sugar Cane Breeding Institute and their workmen]

BETWEEN

: 1 Party/ Claimant

The General Secretary, Sugar Cane Breeding Institute Farm

Labour Union , Coimbatore

AND

:

II Party/Management

TheDirector,

Sugar Cane Breeding Institute , Coimbatore

APPEARANCE :

For the Claimant : M/ s. D. Hariparanthaman , V. Ajoy Khose, Advocates

For the Management Mr. K. Rajendran, CGSC

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L-42012 /242/2002 - IR ( CM- II ) dated 08-05-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the action of the management of Sugar Cane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore in denying bonus to the casual workers for the year 2000-01 for the reason that they have not completed 240 days of service in each year during the previous three years by ignoring their past service with them is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief they are entitled ?"

The Il Party is growing sugarcane and other products for sale apart from rendering service to the farmers and public. The II Party has been employing large number of workmen numbering more than 300 , which includes both male and female workers . During January, 1992 the II party management unilaterally increased the work load apart from reducing the manpower. This led to protest by total work force in the farm. Subsequently, the Respondent/Management imposed a condition for allowing workmen to resume duty that they should give anundertaking that they would not join any union . Only the workmen who gave such an undertaking were allowed to resume work . 153 workmen who did not give undertaking as demanded by the II Party/Management weredenied employment without following any procedure contemplatedunder the provisions of I.D. Act . Therefore, the 153 workers raised industrial dispute against the non- employment ofthe above 153 workmen and the same was taken as I.D. No. 23/93 by the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai and on 19-3-97 the Tribunal has passed an award declaring that the non-employment is unjustified and directed the II Party/Management to reinstate all the 153 workmen withcontinuityof service, back wages and other attendant benefits . The Il Party/Management filed a W.P. No. 17842/ 97 in the High Court and obtained stay. When the Petitioner filed a vacate stay petition the II Party/ Management agreed to reinstate the workmen instead of paying 17B wages . Thus , the II Party /Management reinstated the workmen w.e.f. 1-12-2000 , but the II Party/ Management did not give them bonus or any other benefits, though the other similarly placed workmen were paid bonus and other benefits . Hence , the I Party Union raised this industrial dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) . The other workmen who are similarly placed with the workmen concerned in the dispute were paid Rs . 1700 as bonus for the year 2000- 2001. This is paid without reference to profit or productivity. The Petitioner Union workmen concerned in this dispute have worked for four months from 1-12-2000 to 31-3-2000 and they were not paid proportionate bonus for the period and they were not paid bonus as per Payment of Bonus Act also. The II Party/ Management took a stand that since these workmen have not put 240 days continuously for three years , they were not entitled to bonus for the year 2000-2001 . The action of the II Party /Management in not paying bonus is arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution . Section 8 of the Payment of Bonus Act contemplates that every employee is entitled to bonus in an accounting year, ifheworked for not less than 30 days in the establishment . Therefore, the II Party/Management is bound to pay bonus for 2000-2001 as per section 13 of the Payment of Bonus Act. Furthermore , the II Party/Management was directed 2. After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 83/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

7418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is :-

to reinstate the workmen in service with continuity of service, back wages by an Award in 23/93 . Therefore , it shall be taken that these workmen were put in continuous service of three years and on that score also the II Party/ Management is bound to pay bonus to the Petitioner Union workmen. Hence, the Petitioner Union prays that an award may be passed against the Respondent/Management for payment of bonus to workmen who were reinstated on 1-10-2000 for the accounting year 2000-01 in accordance with the Payment of Bonus Act.

(i ) "Whether the action of the Respondent/ Management in denying bonus to the Petitioner Union Workers for the year 2000-01 for the reason that they have not completed 240 days of service in each year during the previous three years ? "

(ii ) " To what relief they are entitled ?"

Point No. 1:

6. In this case, to substantiate their contention on the side of the Petitioner WW1 namely Mr. Loganathan wasexamined and on the side of the Petitioner Ex. W1 to W5 were marked. Out of which Ex. W1 is the judgement in I.D. No. 23/93 before Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal , Chennai . Ex . W2. is the copy of order of High Court in WMP No : 22208/2000 in W.P. No. 17847/97. Ex . W3 is the list of workers reinstated on 1-12-2000, who were not paid bonus for the year 2000-2001 and Ex . W4 is the copy of industrial dispute raised by the Petitioner before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Chennai . Ex. W5 is the copy of failure of conciliation report . On the side of the Respondent/Management, no witness was examined but Ex. M1 namely office memorandum issued by the Govt. of India , Ministry of Finance dated 16th October, 2001 was marked. It is admitted in this case that 153 workmen were reinstated as per the orders of Industrial Tribunal and as per the orders of High Court - in W.M.P. No. 22208 / 2000 in W.P. No. 17847/97 . It is further admitted that they have been denied bonus on the ground that these 153 workmen have not put in 240 days continuously for three years prior to 2000-01 .

4. As against this , the Respondent/Management in its counter statement contended that the Respondent is functioning under the administrative control of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, the Central Govt . Autonomous Body under the Department of Agricultural Research and Education , Ministry of Agriculture , Government of India. The Institution is engaged purely on agricultural research activities pertaining to sugarcane crop and it does not have any profit motive as per its mandate . All the workers , who were paid bonus for the year 2000-2001 belong to temporary status category and they are not similarly placed as alleged by the Petitioners . As the temporary status labourers were working continuously during the preceding three years and satisfying the other conditions of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, they were paid bonus. The bonus paid workers are not similar to the workers who went on illegal strike disrupting the research work of institute abruptly without any notice . There is no provision in Indian Council of Agricultural Research rules to pay proportionate bonus . The bonus is being paid as per the rules and regulations of ICAR. The said Rules state that the casual labourers have to work for minimum of 240 days in a year continuously during the preceding three years to become eligible for payment of bonus . Since the said workers worked only for four months during 2000-2001 , they went on strike during the preceding three years and they do not satisfy the conditions laid down under ICAR rules , hence , the bonus cannot be paid. Since the question of continuity of service for strike period from January , 1992 to November, 2000 has been challenged in High Court by II Party/Management , the Petitioner Union labourers will be paid bonus as per the Council rules. The payment of bonus is being made as per ICAR rules . The Petitioners are not entitled to any bonus as there is no provision in existing rules to pay proportionate bonus . The temporary status labourers were paid bonus , since they have worked for 240 and more days during the preceding three years . Hence , the Petitioner cannot claim bonus for the period alleged by them . ICAR rules alone are applicable to the labourers working in the organisation and hence , the question of illegality does not arise . The Director has no power to grant or deny bonus to his subordinates . Hence, the dispute is not maintainable either in law or on facts . Therefore, for all these reasons , the

7. On behalf of the Petitioner, it is contended that the denial of bonus to workmen is arbitrary and violative ofArticle 14 of Constitution . Secondly, Section 8 of the Payment of Bonus Act contemplates that every employee shall be entitled to be paid bonus by his employer in an accounting year if he works for not less than 30 days in the establishment in that accounting year. Therefore , the Petitioner Union workmen had worked more than 30 days in the accounting year 2000-01 and therefore , the Respondent Management is bound to pay proportionate bonus for the year 2000-01 , as per Section 13 of the Payment of Bonus Act . The third contention of the Petitioner is that the workmen concerned are entitled to minimum bonus at the rate of 8.33% of the wages earned by them during the accounting year 2000-01 i.e. during the period from 1-12-2000 to 31-3-2000 as per Section 10 of the Bonus Act . Therefore , not paying the proportionate amount to these workmen is unjust , arbitrary 7419 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

actual monthly emoluments . Only on this rule mentioned inthe memorandum , the II Party/Management contended that the Petitioner Union labourers are not entitled to bonus , since they have not worked for 240 days continuously during the preceding three years.

and discriminatory. It is further contended on behalf of the Petitioner that these workmen will be paid only ifthey had continuously worked for the three years putting 240 days of service in each year is contrary to Section 8 of Payment of Bonus Act and therefore, it is illegal .

10. But, again the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that in I.D. No. 23/93 the Industrial Tribunal, Chennai has passed an award wherein the Tribunal directed the II Party / Management to reinstate the Petitioner Union labourers namely 153 labourers with continuity of service and back wages and therefore, even assuming that the Petitioner Union labourers were worked only for four months in the accounting year 2000-01 , as per the Award it should be taken that these workmen had put in continuous service for three years . Therefore , even on this score also the II Party/Management is bound to paybonus for the concerned workman in this dispute for the accounting year 2000-01 .

8. Onbehalfof the Respondent , it is contended that the payment of bonus is being made by the II Party/ Management as per ICAR rules , which stipulate that labourers should have worked not less than 240 days in a year continuously during the preceding three years for particular final year and there is no provision in the existing ICAR rules to pay proportionate bonus . Though the Petitioner Union contended that other labourers belonging to temporary status category are paid bonus , on the other hand , these persons were not paid bonus is of no value because the temporary status labourers are not similarly placed to the Petitioner Union labourers and the temporary status labourers were paid bonus , since they worked for 240 or more days in a year continuously during the preceding three years , whereas the Petitioner Union labourers went on illegal strike and hence the claim is not maintainable . ICAR rules are only applicable to labourers working in the Respondent/Management and hence, there is no illegality as alleged by the Petitioner Union and therefore, they are not entitled to claim bonus .

11. But, as against this , the Respondent contended that the Award in I.D. No. 23/93 of Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has been contested in W.P. No. 17847/97 before the High Court and the contention of the Petitioner that they should have been worked for more than 240 days in a year continuously for three years cannot be accepted in such circumstances and it should depend on the final verdict of the High Court and they cannot take advantage ofthe award passed by the Industrial Tribunal .

12. Though, I find some force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent , since the Respondent/Management in W.M.P. No. 22208/2000 had filed counter affidavit and in that the High Court has passed an order to take all the 153 employees and also directed under section 17B of the I.D. Actto pay wages @Rs. 605 for A Group (male ) and Rs . 550 for B Group (female) labourers per month for a period of two years within a period of 12 weeks i.e. from 13-11-2000 and also passed an order that this order is without prejudice to the stand of both parties in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, from the date 1-12-2000 the Petitioner Union labourers were reinstated in service and they are paid daily wages which is prevailing as on date . Therefore, even assuming without conceding that the Writ Petition is pending against the order in I.D. No. 23/93 , since the Petitioner Union labourers have been reinstated in service and they were also paid arrears under section 17B, it should be considered that they are only reinstated and back wages were also paid as per the orders of High Court . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that they have not worked for more than 240 days in a year continuously inthe preceding three years to the accounting year 2000- 2001. Further, even in the memorandum , it is stated in clause 2 ( i ) that pro - rata payment will be admissible to the eligible employees for the period of continuous service during the year from six months to a full year, the 9. It is seen from the Bonus Act Section 32 ( iv ) that nothing in this Act , namely Payment of Bonus Act , shall applyto employees employed by an establishment engaged in any industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of Central Govt . or State Govt . or a local authority, therefore , though the Petitioner's claim that they are entitled to bonus under Payment of Bonus Act , since the Respondent/Management namely the Sugarcane Breeding Institute functions under administrative control of ICAR, autonomous body of Central Govt . under the Department of Agricultural Research & Education , Ministry of Agriculture , Govt . of India , I find, the Bonus Act is not applicable to the Respondent/Management . Anyhow, the Govt . of India , Ministry of Finance , Department of Expenditure has issued a memorandum in which non -productivity linked bonus ( ad - hoc bonus ) was given to the Central Govt . employees for the year 2000- 2001. Only on this memorandum , the II party/ management has given bonus (ad- hoc bonus ) to the workmen working under their institution. In that, it is specifically mentioned that the casual labourers who have worked in offices following six days week for at least 240 days for each year for three years or more [206 days in each year for three years or more in the case of offices observing five days week ] will be eligible for non- productivity linked bonus (ad -hoc bonus ) payment. The amount of non -productivity linked bonus payable will be Rs . 1200 x 30/30.4 . i.e. Rs . 1184.21 ( rounded off to Rs . 1184) in cases where the actual emoluments fall below Rs. 1200 per month, the amount will be calculated on

3139 जा -42 7420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]

For the II Party/Management:

Ex. No. Date

Description

MI 16-10-01 Xerox copy of the office memo issued by Ministry of Finance , Government of India regarding bonus for 2000-01 .

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

eligibility period being taken in terms of number ofmonths ofservice (rounded to the nearest number of months) and therefore, the proportionate bonus is not given in the memorandum cannot be said as a valid ground. In this case, it is admitted that since the Petitioners have worked for four months from 1-10-2000 to 31-3-2001 , I find they are entitled to bonus as per office memorandum dated 16-10-2001 . Therefore, I find this point that the action of the II Party/ Management in denying bonus to the Petitioner Union labourers for the account year 2000-01 for the alleged reason is not legal and justified .

Point No. 2:

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

का. आ. 2744.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार चेन्नई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -33011/2/2003- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 13. In view of my foregoing findings that the denial of bonus by theIi Party Management is not legal and justified, I find the Petitioner Union workme are entitled to proportionate bonis for the accounting year 2000-2001 as claimed by them. Ordered accordingly. No Costs .

New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004 14. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed andtyped by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 10th August, 2004).

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

S.O. 2744. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 76/ 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Chennai Port Trust and their workman , received by the Central Government on 01-10-2004 .

For the I Party/Petitioner : WWI Mr. M. Loganathan

[No. L -33011 /2/ 2003 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

None

For the II Party/Management :

ANNEXURE

Documents Marked :

For the I Party/Workman :

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Ex . No. Date

Description

Wednesday, the 11th August, 2004 WI 19-03-97

PRESENT :

Xerox copy of the Award in I.D. No. 23/93 Passed by Industrial Tribunal , Chennai .

K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer

W2 13-11-2000

Industrial Dispute No. 76/2003 Xerox copy of the order of High Court in WMP No. 22208/2000 in W. P. 17847/97

W3 Nil

Xerox copy of the list of workmen reinstated on 1-12-2000

[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clanse (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) between the Management of Chennai Port Trust and their workmen) .

W4 Nil

BETWEEN

The General Secretary.

: I Party/Claimant

Madras Port United Labour Union

Xerox copy of the industrial dispute raised by Petitioner Union before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) , Chennai .

AND

W5 09-10-02

The Chairman ,

: 11 Party/Management Xerox copy of the failure of conciliation report.

Chennai Port Trust , Chennai 7421 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

APPEARANCE :

For the Claimant

:M/s R.P. Panncer Selvam & C.R. Malaivannan , Advocates

For the Management Mr. R. Karthikeyan & R. Bharanidharan , Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 33011/2 /2003 - IR(B - II) dated 16-04-2003 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

to withhold the increment when if falls due next for a period of two years without cumulative effect . The said punishment was imposed arbitrarily on the said nurses without giving any fair opportunity to explain the entire situation happened on 4-9-2000 . Therefore , it is unlawful and against the principles of natural justice . The Petitioner Union made several representations to Chief Medical Officer and Chairman, but they were not accepted are rejected by the concerned authorities. Hence , for all these reasons, the punishments are unsustainable and against the principles of natural justice. Therefore , the Petitioner Union prays that an award may be passed holding that the orders passed by the II Party/Management is illegal and to set aside the same .

"Whether the action of the management of Chennai Port Trust in imposing the punishment of postponing the annual increment for two years without cumulative effect in respect of Smt . J. Pramila and Smt . Sambavi is justified ? If not , what relief are they entitled to ?"

2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as J.D. No. 76/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner Union in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:

4. As against this , the Respondent in the Counter Statement contended, that duty hours in Chennai Port TrustHospital for nurses 1st shift is 7.00 am to 1.30 pm, 2nd shift is from 1.30 pm to 8.00 pm and the 3rd shift is 8.00 pm to 7,00 am. On 4-9-2000 , the 2nd shift supervisor Smt . Glory has forwarded a letter dated 4-9-2000 to the ChiefMedical Officer stating that on 4-9-2000 Smt. J. Sambavi , nurse who was posted for night duty did not report for duty upto 8.30 pm and it was also informed to CMO and over time was given to Smt . Pramila to perform her night shift . But , subsequently it is learnt that Smt . Sambavi reported for duty at 8.35 pm and on seeing her reliever , Smt . Pramila left the ward without even informing the shift supervisor or the control officer . Similarly, Smt . J. Sambavi joined duty without informing the control officer or shift supervisor. The control officer asked Mrs. Sambavi to go back and in spite of the same , Smt . Sambavi chose to remain for duty. The 2nd shift supervisor had also added that this was a repeated problem with Smt. Sambavi and hence , requested necessary action in the above matter. The above acts on the part of both nurses was construed as misconduct under 4(6) and 4 (9) ofMadras Port Trust Employees ' (Conduct ) Regulations , 1987 and therefore, they were served with show cause notice and since their explanation were not satisfactory, the authority had ordered for minor penalty of withholding of their increments when it falls due for next two years without cumulative effect under Regulation 8a ( iv ) of Madras Port Trust Employees ' (CCA) Regulations, 1988 as a punishment for their delinquency. Both these persons even after receiving the said orders did not choose to file any statutory appeal as per Regulation 21 of Madras Port Trust Employees ' ( CCA) Regulations , 1988 and the Petitioner Union by its letter dated 7-11-2000 to the Chief Medical Officer has requested to consider their representations . Since it was not made by the individual persons , the Chief Medical Officer did not consider the request of the union and they were informed of the same by letter dated 4-12-2000 . After lapse of three months , the Petitioner Union again made a representation to the Chennai Port Trust and the same was rejected by the Smt . Pramila and Smt . Sambavi are staff nurses in the medical department of the Respondent/Management. Smt . V. Pramila was posted in 2nd shift on 4-9-2000 and Mrs. J. Sambavi was posted in 3rd shift on the same day i.e. 4-9-2000 to discharge their nurse duties in Chennai Port Trust Hospital . Since Smt . J. Sambavi reliever has not reported for duty in time , Smt . Pramila posted in 2nd shift was asked to continue for 3rd shift also by the Duty Doctor posted in 2nd shift . But , on the same day, Smt . J. Sambavi has informed her colleague over phone that she was held up due to traffic dislocation on the way from her residence to Chennai Port Trust Hospital for 3rd shift . As such. Smt . Sambavi has reported for 3rd shift a little late on 4-9-2000 and Smt . Pramila who was posted in 2nd shift on the same day had to go home , as she has not informed her house about her continuance posting in 3rd shift , since the reliever has reported, Smt . Pramila has handed over the charge to the reliever, 3rd shift nurse Smt. Sambavi and left for home . When Mrs. Sambavi has reportedfor 3rd shift, little late , neither the 2nd shift nor 3rd shift incharge were in the hospital . However, there was no dislocation of routine work since both shifts have been carried out avoiding over time on 4-9-2000. While so , Smt. J. Sambavi and Smt . V. Pramila were served with charge memo dated 22-9-2000 by the Chief Medical Officer of theRespondent/Management. Even though both the nurses have given their explanation, they were not accepted by the Chief Medical Officer and they were punished for wilful insubordination and he has ordered 7422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

and for this, the Respondent/Management has issued show cause notice and construed on the ground that they were misconduct under Regulation 4(6 ) and4 (9) of the Madras PortTrust Employees ' (Conduct) Regulations, 1987.

Chairman . Mrs. J. Sambavi, nurse of the Respondent/ Management was a chronic late comer and on that day she did not report for duty till 8.30 pm and hence, the 2nd shift nurse Smt . V. Pramila was asked to do 3rd shift on over time basis . But, at 8.40 pm Mrs. Pramila had left the ward without informing the supervisor or the control officer on seeing Smt . J. Sambavi . Thus, it could be seen that the act of Mrs. V. Pramila and Smt. J. Sambavi are nothing but an act of misconduct which had attracted the provisions under 4(6) &4(9 ) of Conduct Regulations, 1987 and also wilful insubordination of the order of superior. Therefore , the Respondent had rightly imposed the punishment and it cannot be said that the same is illegal. Hence , for all these reasons, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances, the point for my determination is :

( i) "Whether the action of the Respondent/ Management in imposing the punishment of postponing the annual increment for two years without cumulative effect in respect of Smt . V. Pramila and Smt . J. Sambavi is justified ?"

(ii) "To what relief they are entitled ?"

Point No. 1 :

6. It is an admitted case of both sides that the concerned employees namely Smt . V. Pramila and Sint . J. Sambavi who are working as staff nurses in the medical department of the Respondent/Management and on 4-9-2000 , Smt . V. Pramila was posted in 2nd shift i.e. from 1.30 pm to 8.00 pm and Smt. J. Sambavi was posted in 3rd shift i.e. on 4-9-2000 from 8.00 pm to 7.00 am of next dayto discharge their nurses duties in the Respondent hospital.

7. On behalf of the Respondent it is contended that on that day, the 2nd shift supervisor Smt. Glory of the Respondent hospital has sent a letter dated 4-9-2000 to the Chief Medical Officer, copy of which is marked as Ex. MI that on that day Smt . J. Sambavi nurse, who was posted for night duty did not report for duty at 8.30 pm accordingly, the control officer, Deputy Chief Medical Officer was also informed of the same and over time was given to Smt . Pramila to perform night shift, who worked in the 2nd shift and Smt . J. Sambavi reported to duty at 8.35 pm and on seeing her reliever, Smt . Pramila left the ward without even informing the shift supervisor or the control officer. Similarly, Smt. J. Sambavi had alsojoined dutywithout informing control officer or shift supervisor. Evenwhen the control officer asked Mrs. Sambavi to go back and in spite of the sante, Smt . Sanıbavi chose to remain for duty and it is also mentioned that this was a repeatedproblem with Smt . Sambavi and hence, the shift supervisor has requested necessary action in that matter

8. The grievance of the Petitioner Union on behalf of the concerned employees is that even after a valid explanation given by the concerned employees, the Respondent /Management has not satisfied with the explanation and imposed minor punishment of withholding of increments for when it falls due next for a period of two years without cumulative effect which is arbitrary and without giving a fair opportunity to the concerned employees to explain the entire situation happened on 4-9-2000 . The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that Smt . Sambavi has given an explanation that on 4-9-2000 before coming to hospital she caught on traffic jam near Ramachandra Medical Hospital while coming to duty and she has also informed the shift supervisor through Smt . Vasuki , who is a ICU staff that she would report for duty for the said reason little late. The telephonic message was also given to the shift supervisor about her late arrival to duty at 7.15 pm. Since Smt. V. Pramila requested her that she should have to go early to attend her sick baby, she was forced to do 3rd shift duty and she has no intention to disobey her supervisor's orders , but circumstances forced her to complete her shift duty on 4-9-2000 as stated above and she has also requested the management to excuse her for the same due to unavoidable circumstances. Similarly, Smt . V. Pramila also has given her explanation for show cause notice that on that date she had completed her 2nd shift duty in Children's ward at 8.00 pm waiting for reliever of Smt. J. Sambavi to take charge of her 3rd shift duty. When she started from her home to report for duty in the morning, her child was suffering from fever and even in spite of that she has reported for duty with great difficulty, while so at 7.00 pm Smt. J. Sambavi has given a phone message that she caught in traffic jam and she willbe coming to duty little late and she reached for duty at8.25 pm and since she was very anxious to see her sick child, she has requested her reliver Smt. J. Sambavi to resume her 3rd shift duty and immediately she left the hospital as the night shift supervisor was not available at thattime and therefore , she was unable to inform her and her action may be excused if there was any lapse on her part inthatcircumstances. Further, it was argued on behalf of the Petitioner Union that when Smt. Pramila left the office and when Smt . J. Sambavi joined the 3rd shift duty, the 3rd shift in -charge did not raise any objection to her reporting to duty, under such circumstances, it cannot be said that their action amounts to misconduct. Further, it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that various judicial pronouncements clearly stated that charge sheet is the charter of disciplinary action, The domestic enquiry or departmental enquiry commences with the service of 7423 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8, 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

show cause notices issued to the concerned employees are not clear. Only after receiving the same and only after going through the said show cause notice , both the employees concerned have given their explanation. In the case of Smt . V. Pramila, even though she was allotted night shift on over time basis, she has left the ward without informing either the shift supervisor or control officer which amounts to wilful insubordination . Even assuming for argument sake that shift supervisor was not available on that date, the control officer was available and if she wanted to go home immediately, and if the night shift supervisor has not reported to duty she would explain to control officer and take his permission to leave the hospital . But, she has not done anything to that effect. Her act of misconduct warranted the punishment and therefore, the Respondent/Management had ordered for minor penalty of withholding of two increments without cumulative effect under Regulation 8 (a)(iv) of Madras Port Trust Employees ' (CCA) Regulations, 1988 as punishment for her delinquency. In the case of Smt . J. Sambavi , she had not reported for duty till 8.30 pm on 4-9-2000 and Smt. Sambavi who reported late for duty was refused to do duty by control officer, but even in spite of that she reported for duty at 8.30 pm . When the control officer refused to take her in duty, she disobeyed the order, which amounted to wilful insubordination of the orders of superiors , which construed as misconduct and in such circumstances , the Respondent/Management have ordered for minor penalty of withholding of increments for two years without cumulative effect under Regulation 8 (a) ( iv) of Madras Port Trust Employees ' ( CCA ) Regulations , 1988. Even though Smt . Sambavi in her explanation stated that she had informed her late coming to the 2nd shift supervisor at 7.15 p.m. and she had also informed the same through ICU staff Smt . Vasuki , there is no proof thatshe has phoned up to the said Smt . Vasuki regarding her late arrival and hence , her explanation is only an imaginary one . Under such circumstances , at no stretch ofimagination, it can be said that it is illegal or perverse and therefore , this Tribunal cannot interfere at this stage .

charge sheet . Therefore , before proceeding with departmental or domestic enquiry against delinquent employee , he or she must be informed clearly and accurately of the charges levelled against him/her and the charge sheet should specifically set out all charges which the delinquent employees is called upon to show cause against and should also state all relevant particulars and details without which he or she cannot defend himself/ herself. The object of this requirement is that the delinquent employees must know what he or she is charged with and have adequate opportunity to meet the charges and to defend himself or herself by giving proper explanation. In this case , Regulation 14( 1 )(a) of Madras Port Trust Employees (Classification, Control & Appeal) Regulation , 1988 clearly stated it should be in writing of the proposal to take action against her and of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which it isproposed to be taken and giving her an opportunity of making any representation, she may wish to make against he proposal. In this case , even though memorandums vere served to Smt. V. Pramila and J. Sambavi on 22-9-2000 under Ex.M2 and M3 in that it has not been specifically stated as to where , when and before whom the concerned employees have committed that act of insubordination. Further, Disciplinary Authority has not mentioned in the said memorandums clearly and definitely what the allegations are on which the charges preferred against them. Further, the memos were not disclosed any breach of duty or dislocation of duty during the 2nd shift or 3rd shift on 4-9-2000 . Furthermore , neither the control officer nor shift supervisor submitted any report against the concerned employees to the Disciplinary Authority in respect of the misconduct or misbehaviour or insubordination . In this case, there is no dislocation either in 2nd shift or in 3rd shift on 4-9-2000 in hospital . Though Ex.M1 said to have been written by 2nd shift supervisor , on the face of it, it cannot be considered as a proper letter which contains proper page numbers or reference . It was improper and motivated . Further copy of which is not served on the concerned employees . It is held in several judgements of Supreme Court and High Courts that statement of allegations and charges must be specific and it should be supplied to delinquent employees . In this case, the allegation in the memos are extremely vague and indefinite . Even in spite of repeated requests by the concerned employees , no copies of statement of allegations were supplied to delinquent employees . Therefore , the proceedings clearly established the complete disregard of fundamental rules which are mandatory terms and further the charge has not been accompanied, statement of allegations along with memorandum. Under such circumstances, the punishment imposed by the authorities is to be set aside .

10. Learned counsel for the Respondent further argued that punctuality in attendance is always implied condition of service and every management is entitled to regular and punctual attendance on the part of the employees and it has a right to take disciplinary action amounting if necessary to dismissal in order to ensure that these requirements are fulfilled . Further, habitual late attendance is a misconduct and it is generally included in the Standing Orders of industrial establishment because late attendance is a species of absence without leave between time an employees is required to arrive and the time he actually arrives . Though casual or isolated cases of late attendance may not warrant serious punishment yet if an employce makes late attendance as a matter of habit, it can be seriously viewed. In this case , against 9. But , as against this . the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that it is not correct to say that 7424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

W2 12-02-2001 Xerox copy of the letter of I Party/ Union to Chairman, Chennai Port Trust.

For the II Party/Management:

Ex . No. Date Description

MI 04-09-2000 Xerox copy of the report of 2nd shift supervisor to Respondent

M2 22-09-2000 Xerox copy of the show cause notice to Sint . Sambavi

M3 22-09-2000 Хетоx copy of the show notice to Smt . V. Pramila

M4 04-10-2000 Xerox copy of the reply to show cause notice by Smt. Sambavi

M5 17-10-2000 Xerox copy of the replay to show cause notice by Smt . Pramila Smt . J. Sambavi , habitual late attendance has been complained by the shift supervisor, under such circumstances, it cannot be said that she is innocent. Further, it is the duty of workman to comply with lawful order of employer because , obedience to superior officers orders and loyalty to the management are inherent relationship of master and servant and they need not be prescribed. There is no doubt that an employee however old and senior in service has no right to defy the orders of supervisor whatever his grivance in that behalf. Concept of obedience is implicit in the fact that officer receiving the order is subordinate to the officer giving the order and a lawful order has to be obeyed, unless there is good justification for not complying with such a lawful order. In this case , even though control officer has asked Smt. J. Sambavi to get back froın her duty, Sint. J. Sambavi has disobeyed the orders and stayed back for duty without even informing the control officer . Under such circumstances , the action for the wilful insubordination of the orders of superiors and her act construed as an act of misconduct and therefore , the minor punishment imposed on her cannot be considered as illegal .

M6 03-11-2000 Xerox copy of the order of CMO issued to Smt . Sambavi

M7 27-10-2000 Xerox copy of the order of CMO to Sint . Pramila

M8 04-12-2000 Xerox copy of the letter of CMO to Petitioner Union

M9 26-09-2001 Xerox copy of the letter from Chairman, Chennai Port Trust to Petitioner Union .

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर , 2004

11. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent. In this case, though it is argued that meinoranda issued to the concerned employees were not specific, I find this contention is made only for an argument sake and there is no truth behind this allegation . On consideration of entire documentary evidence, I find the action of the Respondent/Management in imposing punishments of postponing the annual increments for a period of two years in respect of Smt . V. Pramila and Smt . J. Sambavi is justified . As such, I find this point against the Petitioner Union .

Point No. 2 :

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

का. आ. 2745.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 39/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । 12. In view of my foregoing findings that the action taken by the Respondent/Management is justified, I find the concerned employees are not entitled to any relief, as claimed by the Petitioner Union . No Costs .

[सं. एल-12012/211/2001- आई, आर. (बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव (Dictated to the P.A.. transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 11th August, 2004 )

New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

On cither side : None

Documents marked :

For the 1 Party/ Claimant :

Ex . No. Date

Description

S.O. 2745.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 39/ 2002) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the the management of Andhra Bank, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 01-10-2004 .

W1 07-11-2000 Xerox copy of the letter of I Party/ Union to Chief Medical Officer

[No. L- 12012/211 / 2001 - IR(B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

7425 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Friday , the 6th August, 2004

PRESENT :

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer

Industrial Dispute No. 39/2002

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) between the Management of Andhra Bank and their workmen)

BETWEEN

Sri Guruprasad S. Mahatma : I Party/Petitioner

AND

: II Party/Management

The Chief Manager ,,

Andhra Bank, Z.O. , Chennai

APPEARANCE :

For the Workman

:M/sR.Sivakumar & S. Suresh

Advocates

For the Management : M/s S. Jayaraman, H. Balaji , V.V. Balasubramanian , Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 12012 / 211/2001 - IR ( B - II ) dated 22/27-03-2002 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Andhra Bank to remove Shri Guruprasad S. Mahatma, Cashier from service vide Order dated 10-07-1999 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 39/2002 and notices were issued to both theeparties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :

misappropriated a sum of Rs . 14,600 for one day and utilised the amount and the second charge is that the Petitioner has misappropriated a sum of Rs. 50,000 . The Petitioner was called for an explanation for these charges and he has submitted his explanation , but not being convinced with the explanation , the Respondent proceeded further with domestic enquiry. A farce enquiry was conducted and the Enquiry Officer has submitted his report dated 18-1-99 wherein, he held that charge No. 1 is not proved against the Petitioner and he further held that charge No. 2 is proved . On the basis of the findings , the Disciplinary Authority has issued a notice and after hearing the Petitioner, he has imposed the punishment of compulsory retirement from service on the Petitioner. The Petitioner's appeal to the Appellate Authority was also dismissed . The Petitioner contended that the charge No. 2is that for CD Account No. 1122 M/s . Sree Vijayalakshmi Finance & Investments the Petitioner on 17-2-96 prepared a debit voucher for Rs. 50,000 with a narration ' amount of cash drawn ' and obtained the signature of the Sub Manager Mr. Sundaram on the voucher and debited the amount in the said current account and drawn the amount . The said voucher did not contain the signature of proprietrix of the concern , hence this is an unauthorised debit. The amount of this voucher was added in payment scroll after the day's total was arrived at . In the rough chitta, the amount was incepted as the last but one item and total , which was already made without the said item, was altered by adding this amount of Rs . 50,000 . Subsequently, the Petitioner had remitted Rs . 30,000 on 27-2-96 and Rs . 10,000 on 1-3-96 and Rs . 10,000 on 5-3-96 for the credit of this account . Thus , the Petitioner has misappropriated a sum of Rs. 50,000. The Petitioner's preliminary objection on the ground of inordinate delay and latches in initiating the charges was not considered by the Enquiry Officer. Further, charge memo dated 8-7-98 is not accusation but conclusive in nature , hence , it is bad in law. Even for this also , the Enquiry Officer has not given any reply. Subsequently, the complainant also reported that he has withdrawn the complaint vide his letter dated 12-8-97 . For this misappropriation, there was no evidence adduced by the Respondent/Management to prove the fact of misappropriation by the Petitioner. The Petitioner also produced documents DEX 3 and 4 to prove that there was no misappropriation of Rs . 50,000 by the petitioner. But, without considering all these things , theEnquiry Officer has come to a perverse view that the Petitioner has misappropriated this amount . Further , the fact of signature of payee was not obtained in the debit voucher is not the fault of the petitioner because the said money was handed over by the then Manager to the customer. The payınent was at his cabin. Therefore, the failure on the part of the Petitioner to verify the signature of the payee on the voucher may be only a procedural lapse and that does not lead to a conclusion that the Petitioner had misappropriated the amount . It is also false The Petitioner was appointed as Clerk- cum- Cashier on 28-4-78 by the Respondent/Bank . While so, to his shock and surprise, he was placed under suspension by the Respondent/Management by letter dated 28-4-98 and they have also issued a charge memo dated 8-7-98 . The charges alleged against the Petitioner are that the Petitioner has 7426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] to contend that the Petitioner has repaid in three instalments by credit vouchers. It was only on the advise ofMr. Naidu, then Manager credit voucher was prepared by him and the management has not produced any evidence to disprove the contention of the Petitioner on the practice adopted by the then Manager. Further, the Sub Manager Mr. Sundaram was also charge - sheeted and a disciplinary proceedings was intiated against him on the very same allegation of misappropriation of the above alleged amount of Rs . 50,000 and on the other hand, for the said charge punishment of stoppage of one increment alone was imposed on him. Therefore , the allegation of misappropriation of amount of Rs . 50,000 against the Petitioner cannot stand because for the very same amount yet another person was also held responsible by the Respondent/Management. The Enquiry Officer's report is bereft of any reasons . Further, the past record of the Petitioner has not been considered and extreme penalty ofcompulsory retirement from service was imposed on him, without considering the unblemished past record of the Petitioner. Hence , for all these reasons , he prays that an award may be passed in his favour to reinstate him into service holding that the order impugned passed by the Respondent/Bank is illegal and unjustified.

charges namely the second charge has been proved against the Petitioner and he submitted his report to the Disciplinary Authority. The Disciplinary Authority after following the procedure has proposed the punishment of dismissal. In fact , after the written submission made by the Petitioner, the Disciplinary Authority has modified the proposed penalty of dismissal to that of compulsory retirement. Therefore , the domestic enquiry was held in a fair and reasonable way and the Petitioner has also got reasonable opportunity to defend his case at every stage of enquiry. Only after the preliminary investigation and inspection it came to light that such misconduct has been committed by the Petitioner. Immediately, after that enquiry and preliminary inspection, a charge sheet was issued to the Petitioner. Hence , there was no delay in initiating the disciplinary proceedings as alleged by the Petitioner. Further , there is no laches or delay in initiating the domestic enquiry. The allegation that charge sheet is not accusation but conclusive in nature is devoid of any merits. In the domestic enquiry the management has produced substantial evidence befoe the Enquiry Officer and proved the charges . Further, the charge of misappropriation is a very serious charge warranting the punishment of dismissal . In this case , the Petitioner is an employee of the bank, where the customers repose their confidence and with the faith and belief that their money will be safe they deposit the money. If such an employee commits such a breach of faith and misappropriate the customer's money, the same has to be viewed seriously. Hence, the punishment of dismissal is appropriate and it cannot be said that it is harsh. Hence , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is-

(i ) "Whether the action of the Respondent/Bank in removing the Petitioner from service vide order dated 19-7-99 is legal and justified ?

( ii) "To what relief the Petitioner is entitled ? "

Point No. 1 :

6. In this case , the Petitioner has stated that the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondent is not fair and proper. After hearing both sides , this Tribunal has answered the preliminary issue against the Petitioner. Subsequently, the case was posted for enquiry, but as the Petitioner has not interested in prosecuting this case further, he has not appeared before this Court. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also not turned up. Therefore , on 27-7-2004, the Petitioner was set ex-parte and Award is pronounced today.

4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended , that while the Petitioner was working as Cashier in Chetpet branch of the Respondent/ Bank, he has committed an act of misappropriation from the account of a customer, which is prejudicial to the interest of the bank. This constituted a serious misconduct as per clause 19.5 (j ) of Bipartite Settlement and therefore , he was suspended from service and subsequently domestic enquiry was held and basing on the report of the domestic enquiry the Disciplinary Authority has imposed the punishment of compulsory retirement on the Petitioner. With regard Current Account No. 1122 favouring M/ s . Sree Vijayalakshmi Finance & Investments Proprietrix Smt . Viji Venkatesh , in that account the Petitioner has prepared a debit voucher for Rs . 50,000 for the above account with a narration ' amount of cash drawn ' obtained the signature of Sub- Manager Mr. Sundaram on the voucher, debited the amount in the said current account and drawn the amount . This voucher does not contain the signature of the proprietrix of the above concern not any authorisation was given by her for such withdrawal. The Petitioner has misappropriated the amount of Rs . 50,000 and repaid the amount. Since the explanation given by the Petitioner was not satisfactory, the Disciplinary Authority ordered for an enquiry and an enquiry was conducted in accordance with principles of natural justice . The Petitioner was allowed the assistance ofdefence representative and he has also utilised the same. The Enquiry Officer after analysing the entire materials namely evidence, written arguments and submissions made thereon, has come to a conclusion that one of the

7. In this case, the Petitioner alleged that he has been charge- sheeted on the ground that he had prepared a debit voucher of Rs . 50,000 for C.D. Account No. 1122 7427 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Further , the misappropriation is a very serious charge warranting punishment of dismissal . In this case , the Petitioner as an employee of the bank, where the customers repose their confidence and with belief and faith that their money willbe safe they deposit the money and if an employee commits such a breach of faith and misappropriate customer's money, the same has to be viewed seriously. On the other hand, Mr. Sundaram has not been charged with misappropriation and he has only authorised the withdrawal voucher and he has not done anything except signing in the voucher. But, the Petitioner has misappropriated the money of customer, therefore, the offence committed by Mr. K. Sundaram, Sub-Manager cannot be equated with the offence committed by the Petitioner and therefore , it cannot be said that there is discrimination among the staff of the bank and therefore, the finding given by the Enquiry Officer is just and proper. Furthermore, in the appeal, the Appellate Authority has reduced the punishment from that of dismissal to compulsory retirement. Under such circumstances, the Petitioner cannot question the punishment imposed on him.

9. Though the Petitioner has made serious contentions against the domestic enquiry and also the punishment given to him , neither he nor his counsel on record has come before this Tribunal to prove how the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is illegal and not valid in law. The Petitioner has not marked any documents in the enquiry. Though he has marked so many documents with regard to preliminary issue , in the enquiry proceedings before this Tribunal , he has not placed any material to prove his contention. As such , I find the Petitioner has not substantiated his contention through any satisfactory evidence and therefore, I find this point against the Petitioner.

Point No. 2:

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

10. In view of my finding that the Petitioner has not substantiated his contention, I find the petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for. No Costs.

ofM/ s . Sree Vijayalakshmi Finance & Investments and obtained signature of the then Sub Manager Mr. Sundaram on the voucher debited for the amount in the above current account anddrawn the amount and he was charge- sheeted that debit voucher is unauthorised and it was not contained the signature of the proprietrix of the concern nor authorised by her. Further, subsequently, he has remitted Rs . 30.000 on 27-2-96 , Rs . 10,000 on 1-3-96 and Rs. 10,000 on 5-3-96 for the credit of that account and thus , he had misappropriated an amount of Rs . 50,000. For the same incident , the then Sub. Manager Mr. K. Sundaram was also charge - sheetedby the Respondent/ Management and he has been charged that for the payment ofunauthorised debit voucher of Rs . 50,000 from the C.D. Account No. 1122 of M/ s . Sree Vijayalakshmi Finance & Investments , the Proprietrix Smt . Viji Venkatesh, which was neither signed by the account holder nor authorised by her, the voucher was written by Mr. Mahatma, the Petitioner herein, then cashier and payment was made without issuing any token . This Respondent/Management had specifically admitted that the then Manager Mr. K. Sundaram had authorised the said payment . Further, it was also admitted that he had made the payment, but in the enquiry held against Mr. Sundaram, he was imposed with minor penalty of withholding of one annual increment without cumulative effect . But on the other hand, for the same incident, the Petitioner was imposed with the punishment of dismissal and this is a clear discrimination and it is not valid. Further, the Enquiry Officer has not taken into consideration the inordinate delay in initiating the disciplinary enquiry. The alleged incident took place in February, 1955 and March , 1996 and the complaint alleged to have been made on 25-7-97, whereas the charge memo was issued only on 8-7-98 i.e. almost three years after the alleged misappropriation. The management has not given any valid reason for inordinate delay in taking disciplinary action. Therefore , the enquiry is vitiated by delay and laches on the part of the management in initiating the disciplinary proceedings . Further, the Respondent/Management has not taken into consideration the Petitioner's unblemished past service for about 21 years and the punishment was also excessive and so many things.

(Dictatedto the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 6th August, 2004. )

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

لو

Oneither side : None

Documents marked :

On either side : Nil

8. As against this , the Respondent contended that since the Respondent has taken preliminary investigation and inspection , there was some delay on the part of the management and only on such inspection , it came to light thatsuch misconduct has been committed by the Petitioner and immediately after that inspection the Respondent/ Management had issued charge sheet to the Petitioner. Hence, the contention that there was delay in disciplinary proceedings istotally unsustainable . With regard to the contention of discrimination , it is contended by the Respondent that the Petitioner's case has to be viewed differently, since he was dealing with the bank's funds .

3139 GI/04-43 7428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L- 12011 / 112 /2002 - IR (B - II ) dated 106-09-2002 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

का. आ. 2746.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank. Anna Nagar branch in terminating Smt . E.Amudha, part - time sweeper from service w.e.f. 9-12-2000 is legal and justified ? If so , what relief is the workman entitled to ?"

[सं. एल-12011/112/2002- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 4th October. 2004

2.After the receipt of the reference, it was taken on file as I.D. No. 86/2002 and notices were issued to both the parties and both the parties entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the Petitioner in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :

S.O. 2746. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 86/ 2002) of the Central Coverament Industrial mal- cum- Labour Court . Chennai as shown in the Annure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen, which received by the Central Government on 01-10-2004.

No. L- 12011 / 112/2002- IR(B- II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COU RE, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 11th August, 2004

PRESENT:

K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 86/2002

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) between the Management of Syndicate Bank and theirworkmen).

BETWEEN

:I Party/Claimant

The General Secretary. Syndicate Bank Employees Union

AND

: II Party /Management

The General Manager ( P), Syndicate Bank, H.O. Manipal .

Appearance :

For the Claimant :M/ s. S. Vaidyanathan. Advocates

For the Management M/ s . T.S. Gopalan & Co.. Advocates

The Petitioner Union is espousing the cause of Smt. E. Amudha , who worked as part - time sweeper in the Respondent/Bank . Smt . E.Amudha's husband C. Elumalai was employed as attender in the George Town branch. Chennai and as he fell ill, he was not attending duties regularly. The bank terminated his service on 24-8-91 on the ground that he voluntarily left the service ofthe bank. He belong to SC/ST community and the said Elumalai died on 30-10-96. The Respondent/Bank after negotiating with the union provided employment to Mrs. Annidha, wife of late Elumalai as part- time sweeper at Anna Nagar branch . After that she was continuously working as sweeper from February, 1999 to December. 2000 and on 9-12-2000 her services were discontinued as per the orders of the Respondent/Bank . Since the Respondent/Bank did not comply with Section 25F of the Act, termination for non - compliance of mandatory provisions makes the order of termination ab initio void. Smt. E. Amudha worked as class IV employee and therefore, Employment Exchange Act is not applicable to class IV employees. The Respondent/Bank has discharged the workman by way of victimisation, not in good faith but in colourable exercise of employer's right . The action of the bank is also in violation of Bipartite Settlement modified from time to time. After discharging casual employment of Mrs. Amudha . the Respondent/Bank has recruited new hands in her place . This is also an utter violation of Section 25G & H of the Industrial Dispute Act. The Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen ) Act , 1981 is applicable to the facts of this case and the concerned workman who has completed more than 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months and she has attained permanent status as per the said Act . Therefore, for all these reasons , the Petitioner union prays

that an award may be passed to the effect that the order 7429 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

passed by the Respondent/ management is illegal and consequently direct the Respondent/Bank to reinstate the concerned workman with continuity of service , back wages and other attendant benefits .

engaged against the norms , it would affect the interest of other members in the panel . Disengagement of irregular temporary appointment would not amount to termination ofservice so as to attract Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act . Si ... Smt . Amudha has not been entered into panel of temporary part-time sweepers , she cannot claim appointment. The claim of permanency in terms of provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 cannot be entertained by this Tribunal . Since Respondent/ Bank is a public sector undertaking of Central Govt . local enactments are not applicable and this Tribunal is not bound by these local Enactments also . Hence , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is :

(i ) "Whether the action of the Respondent/ Management in terminating Smt . E. Amudha from service w.e.f. 9-12-2000 is legal and justified ?

(ii ) " To what relief the said Smt. Amudha is entitled ?"

Point No. 1 :

6. It is admitted case of both sides that the temporarypart -time sweeper Smt. E.Amudha was the wife ofone late Elumalai who was employed as attender in the Respondent/Bank , George Town branch and due to his continuous absence, his services were terminated in the year 1991 as per clause 17 of 4th Bipartite Settlement and subsequently, the Petitioner Union represented to the Respondent/Bank to consider appointment of the concerned workman for temporary part time sweeper by reason of employment of her deceased husband. It is also admitted that husband of Smt . E.Amudha namely Elumalai was not in service at the time of his death and she could not be considered for compassionate appointment . Again, only on the representation of the Petitioner Union, Smt . E. Amudha was appointed on temporary basis for three months by an order dated 3-3-99 under original of Ex . W1 on humanitarian consideration . In this case . E.Amudha was examined as WW1 and another witness namely Mr. K. Umesh Nayak was examined as WW2 , who acted as General Secretary of the Petitioner Union and on the side of the I Party/ Petitioner Ex . W1 to W5 were marked . On the side of the Respondent/Management one Mr. P.R. Narasimha Prasad, who was the Branch Manager of Anna Nagar branch at the relevant time , was examined as MW1 and Ex.M1 to M16 were marked on the side of the Respondent/ Management.

7. On behalf of the Petitioner, it was contended that the Respondent/Bank has discharged the workman namely 4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Respondent/Bank has got Zonal Office which controls Regional Offices in Tamil Nadu and Kerala . The bank has fixed number of posts under each category for each branch and appointments have been made only for sanctioned posts . The bank maintains panel of temporary part -time sweepers to engage during the temporary vacancies of regular part-time sweepers and during the leave vacancy of regular part- time sweepers , one of the temporary sweepers in the panel will be engaged in his place . When an irregular engagement is made against the vacancy of a part -time sweeper and if so found, the Head Office will step in and will order removal of such persons so as to ensure that all the branches stricly follow the guidelines issued in the matter of engaging temporary part- time sweeper against leave vacancy. In this case , the temporary part -time sweeper Smt. E. Amutha , who was the wife of late Elumalai who was employed as an attender at George Town branch, Chennai , owing to his continuous absence , his services were terminated in August, 1991. The Petitioner Union representedto Respondent/ Bank to consider the concerned temporary part- time sweeper for compassionate appointment by reason of employment of her deceased husband. As her husband late Elumalai was not in service atthe time of his death , she could not be considered for compassionate appointment. Then the Petitioner Union pleaded that she should be considered for temporary appointment . As such Smt . Amudha was appointed on temporary basis for three months by an order dated 3-2-99. Anna Nagar branch had one sanctioned post of part-time sweeper. When the vacancy was to be filled up , one of the temporary sweepers in the panel should have been considered for vacancy. However, the concerned temporary part -time sweeper was engaged absolutely on humanitarian grounds only for temporary period of three months , till an arrangement is made by the bank to fillup the vacancy by a suitable empanelled candidate. Since the Smt . E. Amudha was not an empanelled candidate, her engagement was considered irregular and was removed on 9-12-2000 . Since her engagement was irregular, she has no right to claim employment and therefore , the period of her engagement is not relevant. Further, she was not appointed as a regular part-time sweeper for Anna Nagar branch . Furthermore , only candidates sponsored by Employment Exchange could be included in the panel of temporary part -time sweepers and only the candidate in panel could be considered for regular appointment. The bank has already having a panel oftemporary part- time sweeper, who had been sponsored byEmployment Exchange . If a person not in the panel is 7430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 / KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Smt . E. Amudha by way of victimisation and not in good faith and she had worked more than 657 days and since the Employment Exchange Act is not applicable to class IV employees , which was held as such by Supreme Court and High Courts in number of cases , it cannot be said that only Employment Exchange sponsored candidates are alone to be appointed as class IV employees . The action of the Respondent/ Management in discharging the services of the workman concerned amounts to termination and admittedly , the Respondent / Management not complied with the mandatory provisons of Section 25F of theAct, hence , the termination is ab initio void . It is further contended that Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen ) Act , 1981 is applicable to concerned workman in this case . The concerned workman has completed more than 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months and therefore , she has attained the permanent status as per the said Act . Hence , for all these reasons , the order passed by the Respondent/ Management terminating the services of the concerned workman is illegal .

to Workmen) Act , 1981 cannot be entertained by this Tribunal . Since the bank is a public sector undertaking of Central Govt . the local enactments are not applicable to this Tribunal and this Tribunal is not bound by local enactments also . Learned counsel for the Respondent further relying on the rulings reported in 2003 I LLJ 1015 RAVICHANDRAN N.S. Vs. MANAGEMENT OF THANTHAI PERIYAR TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS and also 2003 LLR 169 GOVERNMENT SERVANTS ' CO - OPERATIVE SOCITY LTD . Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , ALAPPUZHA AND OTHERS and argued that the contention that completion of services of 240 days can no longer be regarded as good law in the light of the later judgement of Supreme Court inthe case of ASHWANI KUMAR VS. STATE OF BIHAR AIR 1997 SC 1628 and on the ground that persons who entered service illegally and in breach of law cannot seek protection of the law to remain in service and claim a right to become a permanent part of the establishment on the basis of an illegal entry. Further , he contended that all retrenchments will result in termination of service of a workman by the employer, but termination of service of a workman by employer will not fall within the definition of retrenchment and termination of the services of a workman should have been from a post from which he could have been continued , if the post is , that it continuance is not possible then termination of service of aworkman from that post cannot amount to retrenchment as defined under Industrial Disputes Act . In this case, the appointment of Smt . E. Amudha was against the rules and regulations and guidelines issued by the Govt . , therefore , there was no relationship of master and servant between the bank and Smt . E. Amudha . Smt . Amudha could not be continued in employment of the Respondent/Bank , so her services were terminated and it was in fact, she was terminated as a result of directions given by the Head Office , which the branch office has no control . Under such circumstances . it cannot be said that the termination of Smt . E. Anudha is illegal .

8. But , as against this , on the side of the Respondent , it is contended that the Respondent / Management maintains panel of temporary part -time sweeper to engage during the leave vacancy of regular part- time sweepers and during the vacancy of regular part time sweeper, one of the temporary sweepers in the panel will be engaged in his place and as per the guidelines of the Respondent Zonal Office/Regional Office , under no circumstances , leave vacancy of part- time sweeper can be filled up by any one other than from the panel of temporary part- time sweepers and when any irregular appointment is made against the vacancy of a part - time sweeper, if so found, the Head Office will step in and will order removal ofsuch person so as to ensure that all the branches strictly follow the guidelines issued in the matter of engaging part-time sweeper against leave vacancies of regular part- time sweepers . Further, only the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange would be included in the panel of temporary part - time sweepers and only candidate in the panel could be considered for regular appointment and in this case , the bank has already having a panel of temporary part - time sweeper , who have been sponsored by Employment Excltange and thereføre. the concerned workman who was not sponsored by Employment Exchange and her name has not been included in the panel of temporary part- time sweeper, therefore , she is not entitled to be appointed in the post and the appointment made by the management is irregular and when the irregularity has come to light , it was decided to terminate the services of the concerned workman and therefore, it cannot be questioned in any legal forum. Further, it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that the claim of permanency in terms of provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferinent of permanent Status

9. Though . I find some force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent , I find there is no point in his contention because , even at the time of appointment of Smt . E.Amudha , the Head Office must have known the fact that it is not a compassionate ground appointment and Smt. Amudha was appointed only on the direction of the Head Office . Under such circumstances , the appointment of Smt . Amudha cannot be considered as irregular . Though , it is argued that even the Chairman has no power to make irregular appointment , in this case , the appointment was made on humanitarian grounds and the said Smt. Amudha was continued to be worked as temporary part - time sweeper for more than 480 days i.e. 657 days . Under such circumstances , without following any mandatory provisions thetermination was effected by the Head Office .

7431. भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Therefore, I find some force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the discharge of the Petitioner was not in good faith and in colourable exercise of employer's rights .

months and therefore , she is entitled to be regularised in the post as per Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. Further, the Petitioner union wants to reinstate the concerned workman with effect from the date of her completion of 480 days or at least from 9-12-2000 with continuity of service , back wages and attendant benefits. Since I find that the concerned workman is entitled to the benefits , I find she should be regularised from the date of her termination i.e. from 9-12-2000. As such , 1 find this point in favour of the Petitioner Union.

Point No. 2 :

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

10. Again , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that under a wrong impression the said workman was appointed on compassionate grounds that on the date of death of Elumalai he was working as an employee of the Respondent/Bank. But , even though it is contended that the appointment of Petitioner was under wrong assumption , I find from the order of appointment Ex.WI that the said appointment was not made on compassionate ground and therefore , I find there is no force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent that the appointment of Sint . Amudha was on compassionate ground.

13. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned workman in this dispute is entitled to the benefits as claimed by the Petitioner Union . Therefore, I direct the Respondent /Management to reinstate the concerned workman Smt . E.Amudha as permanent workman w.e.f. 9-12-2000 with continuity of service , back wages and other attendant benefits . No Costs .

14. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected andpronounced by me in the open court on this day the 11th August, 2004) .

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

For the I Party/Claimant

: WW1 Smt . Amudha WW2 Sri K. Umesh Nayak

For the II Party/Managmemt : MW1 Sri P.R.

Narasimha Prasad 11. Further, the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the Supreme Court in the cases reported in 1996 6 SCC 216 and 1995 2 SCC 1 has held that Employment Exchange Act is not applicable to Class IV employees and further , the Respondent/Bank has not obtained any exemption under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981 wherein under Section 9 of the Act, the Government has to exempt certain establishments from the provisions of the Act . Though the Respondent argued that the provisions of the said Act is not applicable to the Respondent/Bank , it was not shown before this Tribunal how this provision is not applicable to the banks in Tamil Nadu , as such , I find the concerned workman who has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and who has worked for more than 480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months is to be regularised in her service .

Documents marked :

For the I Party/Claimant :

Description

Ex. No. Date

03-02-99

W1 Xerox copy of the order of appointment issued to concerned workman

Nil

Xerox copy of the S.B. pass book of concerned workman

09-12-00

Xerox copy of the order of termination issued to Concerned Workman

27-04-02

Xerox copy of the reply submitted by Respondent before Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central)

12-02-02

Xerox copy ofthe industrial dispute raised by Petitioner union on behalf ofSmt. E.Amudha .

12. Again, the learned counsel for the respondent contended that in the Respondent/Bank appointments were made only for sanctioned posts and the bank appointed including the part- time sweeper as required for office branch as per Govt . guidelines . In this case , after the discharge ofthe concerned workman, a person in the panel has been appointed as temporary part -time sweeper and therefore , as it is there is no vacancy in the post of temporary part -time sweeper, it cannot be contended that the concerned workman is not entitled to reinstatement in service. Further, it was contended by the learned counsel Respondent that even for the vacancies , the concerned workınan has stated that she is not willing to join as temporary part -time sweeper, but only for a permanent post . Under such circumstances , she should not be reinstated in the post of temporary part -time sweeper . Though his argument is vehement , I find there is no point in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Respondent because, the concerned employee had worked for more than 480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar 7432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

For the II Party /Management :

Ex. No. Date

Description

17-07-98 Xerox copy of the circular issued by respondent regarding appointment of part-time sweeper M2 03-02-99 Xerox copy of the letter from respondent to concerned workman appointing her as Temporary Part- time sweeper

M3 04-10-00 Xerox copy ofthe inter office memo ofAnna nagar branch to concerned workman

M4 15-11-00 Xerox copy of the letter from General Manager (P) to Deputy General Manager ( P) regarding Appointment of concerned workman

M5 08-12-00 Xerox copy of the letter from Deputy General Manager to Branch Manager, Annanagar M6 09 12-00 Xerox copy of the order of termination issued to concerned workman

M7 23-08-03 Xerox copy of the details of regular vacancies of Part- time sweeper in Annanagar branch

M8 03-11-90 Xerox copy ofthe Head Office letter to all Z.O. Regarding appointment of part- time sweeper

M9 28-03-00 Xerox copy of the letter of Head Office to Zonal Officers regarding guidelines for filling up vacancy of part-time sweeper

M10 05-10-02 Xerox copy ofthe letter from Union to Respondent regarding posting of part- time sweeper in Chennai M11 18-12-02 Xerox copy of the minutes of joint meeting.

M12 10-06-03 Xerox copy of the minutes ofjoint meeting.

M13 14-01-04 Xerox copy of the minutes ofjoint meeting.

M14 Nil

Xerox copy of the list of part-time sweeper in Panel of Chennai city.

M15 Nil

Xerox copy ofthe list of part - time sweepers presently working in Chennai city.

[PART II- SEC , 3 ( ii ) ] Nil

M16

Xerox copy of the consolidated gist of guidelines to be followed by Zonal Offices .

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2747.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 62/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/175/92- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi. the 4th October, 2004

S.O. 2747. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 62/93 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 04-10-2004.

[No. L -42012/ 175 / 92 - IR ( DU ) } KULDIP RAI VERMA . Desk Officer. ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh . Presiding Officer Case No. I.D. No. 62/93 Date of Decision 3-9-2004

Deep Ram Sharma son of Shri Amar Singh . Village Mandhana . Tehsil Kalka . District Ambala . Haryana. ....Applicant

Versus

1. Executive Engincer. O & Main Division , BBMB Dhulkot . District Ambala. Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the workman : Shri O. P. Batra For the Management Ms. Jyoti Kaushal AWARD

The reference No. L- 42012/ 175 / 92 - IR ( DU ) dated 13th ofMay, 1993 made under Section 10 of the Industrial 7433 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग 11 - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Disputes Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) reads asunder :

"Whether the action of the Executive Engineer, O&M Division BBMB , Dhulkot in terminating the services of Shri Deep Rain , son of Shri Amar Singh, T. Mate from 10-1-1986 is justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from what date ?"

him notice, retrenchment compensation . He claimed that by any calculation he has served for 252 days preceding the date of his termination and thus he was entitled for protection of Section 25F ; that he was not given any extension in service , but in terms ofhis appointment letter, he was to continue in service and could be transferred as stated earlier. He further contested the claim of the management, made with the help of Section 25FFF of the Act, saying that there was no new set up which was closed by the management and even if it was there , they were required to seek permission u/s . 25-0 of the Act, before doing that, which they have not done .

2. After receipt of the notices of the reference, the parties appeared and filed their pleadings in the shape of statement of claim , written statement and replication. They also filed affidavits and deponents examined and cross- examined by them .

5. The petitioner has further claimed that the management did not prepare any seniority list at the time of terminating his service and the one issued by them on 1-1-1990, clearly indicates that the workmen, standing at Nos . 192 to 203 , 205 and 227 were recruited later than him and so were juniors to the petitioner, but they were retained in service , in violation of Section 25G . He admitted that he was called for re -employment w.e.f. 1-11-1992 to 20-2-1993 , but he claims that he had remained unemployed w.e.f. 11-1-1986 to 31-10-1992 , then from 20-2-1993 to till date , whereas his juniors , standing at Sr. Nos . 206 to 212 were retained in service, that the respondent retained their kith and kin in service , whereas the petitioner was ousted . Reiterating his claim that he had served for 240 days, before his termination, he has claimed that he is entitled to all the benefits under the law.

3. The claim of the applicant, as made out by him in his statement of claim as well as in the replication is that he was appointed as T. Mate in work charged capacity on 29-8-1984 and he continuously served till 10-1-1986 when his services were terminated illegally, without following the law, that he raised dispute about his illegal termination , before the Conciliation Officer, but the management did not co -operate whereupon the present reference was made , on the recommendation of the ALC ( C) , Chandigarh, that he had served the management for 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of his termination and as such he was entitled to 30 days notice, retrenchment compensation in terms of Section 25F of the Act, that he had been appointed on permanent basis . Asper terms of appointment letter, he could be transfer to anywhere in the State of Punjab & Haryana , under the respondent Board . His services were terminated arbitrarily, that the management further violated the provisions of the Act as contained in Section 25G , since they retained his juniors in service whereas he was thrown out . They also recruited new hands , in violation of Section 25H, without offering him re - employment . He named Lekh Raj and Ram Parkash who were appointed on 21-1-1992 by S.E. , O&M Circle Jamalpur and who are continuing in service . Besides the management had recruited a good number of employees by back door entry ignoring the claim of the petitioner .

6. The management has opposed the claim of the petitioner stating that the reference is bad since there existed no dispute between the parties , as the petitioner was appointed against specific work, and was disengaged on the completion of the said work. Moreover the reference is bad for delay and latches . On merits , it is admitted by the management that the workman was appointed as T. Mate in work charged capacity vide order dated 5-11-1984, but contested the claim of the petitioner that he was appointed on 29-8-84 . They further admitted that the services of the petitioner were extended from time to time, as per requirement of the work and it came to an end on the completion of the work on 25-7-1985 . They also admitted that they had given only 10 days notice to the workman, but stated that no notice was required tobe issued in view of the terms of the employment of the workman. According to them, the workman was again engaged on 15-11-1985 , against deposit work of 66 KV Sub Station , Chandigarh and was disengaged on 10-1-1986, on the completion of the said job . They have submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to any benefit in terms of Section 25F of the Act , since he was engaged against specific work , so his case was covered by Section 25FFF of the Act . Not only he, all the workers employed against deposit work were disengaged. They have claimed that the seniority list was maintained at the time of 4. In reply to the objections of the management it is submitted by the workman that there was no delay in raising the dispute since he had served the demand notice on 3-2-1989 and the reference was made to this Tribunal in the year 1993. The workman contested the claim of the management and stated that he had joined the services of the management on 29-8-1984 and had worked upto 31-10-1984, which fact is admitted by the In -charge SDO of the respondent . Heclarified that the offer of appointment was given to him on 6-11-1984 since the management had no work for the workman to be done. He worked from 6-11-1984 till 25-7-1985 continuously. The management , due to cession of work , did not utilize his services till 15-11-1985 and thereafter, he had worked upto 10-1-1986, when his services were finally terminated, without giving 7434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIΚΑ 8, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] terminating the services of the workman , on the completion of the deposit work of UT, Chandigarh and stated that the workman was given re -employment against a new deposit work on 23-10-1992 , for a short spell, as per requirement and he worked from 1-11-1992 to 20-2-1993 . They have claimed that the workman is not entitled to any monetary benefits in the light of terms and conditions of the appointment letter and for the reasons submitted in the written statement .

8. The workman further contended that T. Mates standing at Sr. Nos. 192 to 203 , 205 , 227 in the seniority listdt. 01-01-90 , were juniors to him , as per date of appointment, given in para -6 . The management retained theseT. Mates, which werejunior to workman and thereby violated the provisions of Section 25 -G of the Act . He admitted that the management had re -employed him w.e.f. 01-11-92 to 20-02-93 , but he remained idle from 11-01-86 till 30-10-92 and from 20-02-93 till date , whereas the management recruited fresh hands , standing in the seniority list at Sr. Nos . 206 to 212. Besides , the management transferred their kith and kins to other places, so asto save them from retrenchment, as they werejuniors . That since the workman had performed duty for 240 days, before the date of termination of his service , the management violated the provision of law, as they did not issue any notice to him , before the termination of his services nor paid him the retrenchment compensation. As such the workman is entitled to be treated in continuous service and for all the benefits , as if he was never retrenched . The workman has reiterated all these facts in his affidavit Ex . W1 . Also placed on record is certificate of service Ex. W2 , his demand notice Ex . W3 , the recommendation of the ALC ( C) , Chandigarh Ex. W4, another letter of ALC ( C) , Chandigarh Ex. W5 , the appointment letters of Lekh Raj and Ram Prashad alleged to be in violation of the provision of the Act Ex . W6 and Ex . W7 , seniority list Ex. W8.

9. By the present reference this Tribunal is required to adjudicate upon the question whether the action of the Executive Engineer , O & M Division, BBMB, Dhulkot, in terminating the services of Sh . Deep Ram s/ o Shri Amar Singh. T-Matefrom 10-1-1986 is justified or not . In case this Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the termination of the said workman was not justified then to what relief he is entitled to and from which date ?

7. After the filing of written statement, by the management , the workman filed rejoinder whereby he submitted that there is no basis for the management to raise preliminary objections to the maintainability of the reference . In view of the offer of appointment , which contained the stipulation that though the appointment is for a specified period , yet the same could be extended and the workman could be transferred to any place in the States ofHaryana & Punjab under B.B.M.B. Thus by their conduct the management showed that the appointment of the workman was on regular basis. As regards the objection about the delay in raising in dispute, the workman stated that he had submitted the demand notice on 03-02-1989 , whereupon the matter was referred to this Tribunal. Therefore , it is not the workman who came late rather the Ministry concerned took time to refer the matter for adjudication . The workman reiterated his claim, that he had joined the service with the respondents, on 29-08-1984 and served them till 30-10-1984 . Again he worked for them from 06-11-1984 continuously up to 25-07-1985 . Again he served them from 15-11-1985 to 10-01-86, when his services were terminated . In between those small intervals the management told him that they have no work for him . As such there came breaks in the continuity of his service till the date he was finally terminated from service . However, he completed a continued service of 252 days i.e. between 09-01-1985 to 10-01-1956. As such he performed continued service for more than 240 days and thereby became entitled to the benefits of Section 25- F of the Act , that there was never an order of extension , in his service , from time to time , as it was never served upon him. Moreover, the offer of appointment contained the stipulation , that the services were likely to be continued and the workman could be transferred to anywhere in the State of Haryana & Punjab , under the B.B.M.B. Challenging the legal claim of the management , it is submitted by a workman that Section 25 -FFF is not helpful to the management for the reason that the management had not set up a new venture as the work was under the B.B.M.B. and even if the set up was separate and distinct, then also it was required of the management to have obtained permission of the appropriate Government before closing the said new set up. On this ground also in terms of Section 25 (O) sub - clause 6 , the closer of such a ' set up ' was illegal and the workman is entitledto all the benefit as if the set up had not been closed.

10. The workman after getting the notice of the reference came to this Tribunal and filed his statement of claim that he was appointed T - Mate, on work charge capacity w.e.f. 29-08-84 and served in that capacity continuously till 10-01-86, when his services were terminated illegally against which he approached the Labour Commissioner, that at the time o termination of his services, he had put in service for 240 days in the year preceding the date of termination , but the management did not give him notice of 30 days nor followed the provisions of Section 25 (F) of the Act. He was also not paid retrenchment compensation ; that the post against which he was appointed, was permanent one, but despite thathis services were terminated in an arbitrary manner. The management did not maintain any seniority list and retained in service juniors to the workman, whereas he was thrown out . Besides raw hands were recruited, but no option, of re -employment, was given to the petitioner. He mentioned the names of Lekh Ram and Ram Prashad, 7435 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

who were appointed on 21-01-92 by the Superintending Engineer , O & M Circle , Jamalpur. There was other backdoor recruitments made by the respondents . Thus , the management violated the provisions of Section 25(G & H). He prayed for his re - instatement in service with full backwages and benefits of continuity in service .

benefits of Section 25 (F) of the Act . The workman contested the application ofprovisions of Section 25 (FFF) ofthe Act in the matter saying these are not applicable in his case since he had not been appointed in a new set up, but was recruited by the B.B.M.B. nor the said set up was closed. He further contended that the management had not obtained permission from the appropriate Govt. to close down the set up , in which he was appointed as was required under Section 25 (0) of the Act. He further claimed that as per the seniority list, prepared by the management on 01-01-90, the T. mates standing at Sr. No. 192 to 203 , 205 to 227 were appointed between 17-09-84 to 01-12-85, as per detail given in para 6 of the rejoinder and the T. mates standing at Sr.. No. 227 , in that list i.e. Sadhu Ram, was recruited on 16-02-85 and as per the record they were all juniors to him and by recruiting them without giving him option of re- employment the management violated the provisions of Section 25 (G) ofthe Act .

13. He further admitted that he was called for re- employment from 01-11-92 to 20-02-93 , but he remained idle from 11-01-86 to 30-10-92 and from 20-02-93 , till date. He has further claimed that T. mates , standing at Sr. No. 206 to 212, as per the seniority list enclosed, freshers had been recruited, by ignoring the claim of the petitioner . The management further acted malafidely by transferring their kith and kins recruited in violation of provisions of Section 25(G) of the Act to other places , so as to save them from retrenchment. The petitioner again prayed for cancellation of his termination order and for backwages , other benefits and continuity in service.

11. The management has opposed the claim of the petitioner by their written statement where they stated that the reference is bad since there existed no dispute between the parties. The petitioner was appointed against the specific work and was disengaged on the completion thereof. The reference is also bad because of latches . On merit , it is their case that the petitioner was appointed not on 29-08-84 , but by an orderdt . 05-11-84 , against the temporary deposit work of 66 KV sub- station, Sector 52 , Chandigarh and he had joined his duties on 06-11-84; that the work, against which the petitioner worked ended on its completion on 25-07-85 and in that between the appointment ofworkman, was extended from time to time; that 10 days notice was given to the workman, though it was not required to be given, before terminating his services ; that the workman was again appointed on 15-11-85 , against the deposit work 66 KV, Sub Station, Sector 52 and was disengaged on 10-01-86, on the completion of that work. Taking the support of Section 25(FFF) of the Act, it is claimed by the management, that since the petitioner was engaged against a specific work, so his case is not coveredby Section 25 (F) of the Act . Claiming that they had prepared the seniority list of the workmen, at the time of termination of petitioner from service , they stated that he was again called for employment, for a short spell on 23-10-92 and he served from 01-11-92 to 20-02-93 . According to them the workman is not entitled to any monetary or other benefits , as per the terms and conditions of his appointment . They have requested for dismissal of claim of the petitioner.

14. The workman testified all the facts stated in the claim petition and rejoinder , by his affidavit Ex. WI . Heplaced on record a certificate from SDO, Ex. W2 , his représentation to the Executive Engineer Ex. W3 , a copy of letter from ALC ( C ) Chandigarh Ex . W4 , another letter of ALC ( C) Chandigarh Ex. W5 , copy of offer of appointment to Lekh Raj Ex. W6 , the offer of appointment to Ram Prashad Ex . W7 , seniority list Ex. W8.

15. The management also produced documents such as joining report of the workman Ex. Ml showing ashaving joined the duties on 06-11-84, Ex. M2 is another joining report showing the workman having joined duties on 15-11-85, termination notice M3 , another termination notice M4, affidavit of Sh . S.C. Mangal , Sr. Executive Engineer , O & M, Division Dhulkot 'M5 ' . The petitioner as well as Mr. S.C. Mangal appeared as witnesses and testified their affidavits , placed on record. The petitioner in his statement proved his affidavit and the documents exhibited as W2 to W8 . When cross -examined , he denied the contents of Ex . M1 , his joining report and stated that he had not been served with Ex. M2 and M3 , though he had received Ex . M4 .

12. The workman filed rejoinder and reiterated the facts stated in the statement of claim . He denied that he had ever received any order of extension in service , therefore , claimed that his appointment was regular. He further contested that there was delay in raising the demand , since he had served the demand notice on 03-02-89 and it was the Ministry, which caused the delay to send the reference to the CGIT in 1993. He claimed that he had served the respondents from 29-08-84 till 30-10-84, as is certified by SDO concerned. It is further claimed that he was given offer of appointment for 5 days from 01-11-84 to 05-11-84 , and then he was continuously employed till 25-07-85 . Thereafter, he was again re- employed from 15-11-85 till 10-01-86 when his services were finally terminated, without any notice . It is his claim that on the day of termination of his services i.e. on 10-01-86, he had put in continuous service of 252 days preceding upto 09-01-85 , therefore, he was entitled to the

3139 G1/04-44 7436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

18. From the co -joint reading of the evidence , brought on record by both the parties , it comes out that the evidence has supported the claim of the petitioner that he had put in continuous service of 240 days during one year preceding the date of termination of his services on 10-01-86; that the management did not follow the command of Section 25 of Act, as they did not issue one month's notice to the workman nor paid him salary for the notice period before terminating his services. They also did not pay him the retrenchment compensation nor brought the matter of termination to the notice of appropriate Govt. Thus they violated the provisions of Section 25F of the Act .

16. Sh . S.C. Mangal , Executive Engineer , B.B.M.B. , Dhulkot , in his statement proved his affidavit M5 . He admitted that he had stated wrong facts in his affidavit , that the workman had worked from 01-11-82 to 20-02-93 . It was a topographical mistake. He admitted that the workman had served from 01-11-92 to 20-01-93 . According to him the workman had completed 240 days service , on the date of termination of his services. He admitted that only 10 days notice was given to the workman , before his retrenchment and that no retrenchment compensation was paid to him . He claimed that when the work finished, every body working in the project was terminated. He admitted that Ex . W8 is the seniority list, prepared by his department , but could not say whether Deep Ram, the workman was terminated from service, whereas his juniors standing at Sr. No. 192 to 203 were retained , saving that he did not know whether those persons were also working in the project or not. He kept on changing his stand saying that the same were retained by specific orders and then said that none was retained. He could also not say as to how many persons were engaged in the year 1992, for specific work. He admitted that the work of B.B.M.B. is still going on, but could not say whether anybody was appointed after 1992 or not. On the one hand he admitted that on compassionate ground, some persons were appointed , but on the other hand he stated that no new person was appointed.

19. The management also violated the provisions of Section 25G& H , as is alleged and proved by the workman. They admitted that seniority list Ex. W8 is their document . Page 8 of this document contains the names of T. Mates , Kashmir Singh and others up to Jaswinder Singh shown from Sr. No. 192 to 203. As per this record these persons were recruited between the period 01-10-81 to 20-06-85 . The petitioner has claimed that these T. mates , who werejunior to him, were retained in service whereas his services were terminated on 10-01-86 . The management has failed to explain this position as their witness S. C. Mangal beat about the bushes , when stated that he cannot say as to whether those persons werejuniors to the petitioner or not . Thus , this claim of the workman isalso proved.

17. The statement of S.C. Mangal , binds the management as per the rule of law, this witness has admitted the case of the workman to the extent that on the day of termination of his services , the workman had put in continuous service of 240 days ; and that only a notice of 10 days was given to the workman before the termination of service; that he was not paid retrenchment compensation . The witness though admitted that Ex. W8 is the seniority list , prepared by the management, but he could not say whether the workman shown at Sr. No. 192 to 203 , were junior to the workman or not. He admitted that the work of the B.B.M.B. is still going on ; and that some persons had been appointed on compassionate grounds, but he could not answer whether anybody was appointed after 1992 or not . It comes out from the statement of this witness that he did not state truth in the Tribunal and withheld the facts , may be those facts were not convenient to the management . His attitude, while making the statement, also was not constant and regular. He made shifting statements and thereby made mess of things . The management did not think it proper to keep the record straight by offering to produce other witnesses or at least by placing on the file the concerned record so as to qualify the answers to the questions, which their witness could not reply properly. By withholding the relevant record the management has allowed the Tribunal to presume that if produced the same would go against their interest.

20. The management has placed much reliance on their claim that the petitioner was appointed against a specific work and his services were terminated on the completion of that work . They have thereby taken the support of Section 2(oo) of Sub -section (bb) , which reads: termination of service of the workman, as a result of none renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation, in that behalf contended therein " is not termination " . A photocopy ofoffer of appointment , given to the workman, in compliance to which he joined the service with the management is on record and the management does not deny its contents. As per the offer of appointment given to Deep Chand by the B.B.M.B. under the signatures, of their Executive Engineer, O & M, Division , B.B.Μ.Β, Dhulkut , under his No. 9795/96 dt . 05-11-84 , the workman was appointed for one month against the work of66 KV, Sector- 52 , Chandigarh . It is not the case of the management that after the expiry of one month, his services were terminated. The evidence brought on record shows that the services of the workman were not terminated immediately after the expiry of one month, but those were continued . The offer letter itself contained the stipulation that his employment was likely to be extended , from time to time and he could be transferred to anywhere in Punjab, Haryana under the B.B.M.B. Thus , 7437 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

the business or activity of an employer, could be covered by the definition . In that case the workman was recruited on work charge establishment of the Ranchi Housing Project, which was a distinct venture undertaken by the Hindustan Steel Ltd. The said project had distinct beginning and end. It had established separate office and on the completion of the project the entire undertaking was closed . It was in these circumstances that the Apex Court held that the termination of services ofthe workman on the closer of such a project would not be retrenchment as defined by Section 2(oo) sub -section (bb) of the Act . This is not the situation in the present case here . It is not the claim of the management that the work of 66 KV, sub-station, Sector - 52, Chandigarh was a separate project , for that it had separate beginning and end ; and that the project began and ended on such and such date . There is no evidence , in this regard , produced by the management, rather, as stated earlier the offer of appointment, given to the workman , as noted above , itself shows that the workman had been engaged by the management against all its work, in the states of Haryana and Punjab and his recruitment was not against a specific work . As such the authorities referred to by the management are not helpful to them.

21. The management has also placed on record photo copies of the awards passed by my predecessor in the case ID No. 38/94 and ID No. 82/90 decided on 13-03-2003 and 03-01-2002 respectively. With respects I say, these Judgements do not guide me to the conclusions I propose to arrival at . In my opinion these authorities are also not of any help to the management .

22, After sifting, scanning and weighing all the evidence, brought on record , I am of the opinion that the workman is successful in proving that at the time of his retrenchment he had completed continuous service of240 days and the management violated the provisions of Section 25 (F) of the Act, as they did not give proper notice to the workman before terminating his services. They did not pay him retrenchment compensation . They also did not inform the appropriate Government about his termination . Thus the termination ofpetitioner was illegal and void ab initio . He is , therefore, held to be in service right from the date of his termination. I further, hold that the management violated the provisions of Section 25 G & H also when they retained the juniors and recruited fresh hands like Lekh Raj and Ram Prashad by exhibits W6 and W7 and by not following the seniority as prepared by them by exhibits W8 .

23. It has come on record that after his retrenchment, the workman was given re -employment for certain periods. The management has not shown that right from the date of his termination, except for the period he was re -employed by them , the workman remained grainfully engaged, whereas the workman has stated in it is clear that the recruitment of the workman though was shown to be against 66 KV, sub - station - 52 , Chandigarh, but as a whole , the offer was to put him in job against any of the works of the B.B.M.B. , in the States of Punjab and Haryana . Another offer letter No. 11533/ 34 dt. 11-11-85 is also on record, which is also in the similar form and contains the same terms of recruitment, as were contained in the earlier offer appointment letter. Thus the management has failed to bring on record any specific , documentary or oral evidence, to show that the work of 66 KV, sub- station , Sector-52, Chandigarh, was for such and such period and it was completed on such and such date , where upon the services of the workmen were terminated. The notice of termination, given by the management itself makes interesting reading because it nowhere states that the work has been completed. The notice bearing No. 785 , dt. 15-07-85 states that the work against which the workman was engaged is almost complete. The other notice bearing No. 553 , dt. 10-01-86 reads that the services of the workman aré no more required. Therefore, the same are being terminated without any notice as per the terms and condition of his letter of appointment . The two notices thus, contain contradictory statements . Therefore , it cannot be stated that the services of the workman were terminated since the work against which he was recruited was , by then, complete. The management has taken the support of a Judgement of the Supreme Court reported as 1997 (3 ) LLN65 in the case of Escorts Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer and others . The law laid down by their Lordships of the Supreme Court is that the termination of services of a daily- wage workman , in accordance with terms of appointment , is not retrenchment . Termination of services of a workman as a result of non -renewal of contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned or on such contract being terminated under stipulation is not termination as defined by section 2, sub -section (oo) , sub- clause (bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act . This law is not helpful for the management for the simple reason that since the management has failed to prove that the recruitment of the petitioner was under a specific contract of employment or the said contract contained stipulation like the one claimed by them . In this case , no doubt the initial appointment of workınan contained some stipulation , like his appointment for one month , but the other conditions contained therein clearly suggested that he has been appointed not against the specific work , but also against the all works of BBMB all through the States ofPunjab & Haryana , initially for one month , but it was extended in such manner that the stipulation of the time faded away and he continued in service. In the other Judgement , referred to by the management , in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. Vs. their workman, their Lordships held that as per the definition of undertaking , contained in section 25 ( FFF ) , it could be said that it is intended to include entire industry or business of an employer. Accordingto them , even the closer or stoppage , a part of 7438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

his statement that he remained idle although without job except for the period , he was re - employed by the management . Taking these facts into consideration I, hold that the workman is entitled to the back wages from the date of termination of his services till date , excluding the period during which he remained employed with the management. As regards the extent of the wages I am of the opinion that since the workman did not actually served the management, though not for his own fault, it will be in the interest of justice that only wages up to the extent of 50 per cent be paid to the workman. The reference made is , therefore , is answered in these terms . A copy of this award be sent to the appropriate Govt . for necessary action the file be consigned to record after due completion.

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2748.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सैन्ट्रल सोयल एण्ड सैलिनिटी रिसर्च इंस्टिट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 109/94) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-10-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/91/93- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004

S.O. 2748.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 109/ 94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Soil and Salinity Research Instt. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 4-10-04 .

[No. L-42012/91 /93 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh , Presiding Officer .

Case No. ID 109/94

Date of Decision 13-09-2004

Shri Daya Ram S/o. Sh . Girdhari Lal, Village & Post Office Saidpura , Distt . Karnal. ... Applicant

Versus

Director, Central Soil and Salinity Research Instt. , Karnal.

.... Respondent

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii ) ] APPEARANCES :

For the workman : Shri D. R. Sharma .

For the management Shri R. K. Sharma.

AWARD

The reference No. L-42012 /91 /93 -I.R. (D.U. ) dated 24th August , 1994 made under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) reads asunder:

"Whether the action of the management of Central Soil and Salinity Research Institute , Karnal in terminating the services of Shri Daya Ram Ex -Daily paid labour is justified ? If Not , what relief he is entitled to and from what date ?"

2. Today the workman appeared and made a statement that he does not want to persue with the present reference as he has already got the regular appointment in the State Govt. and the reference may be returned as withdrawn. In view of the statement of the workman , the presentreference is returned to the Ministry as withdrawn. Central Govt . be informed.

Chandigarh: 13-9-2004

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 4 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2749. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 143/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/12/91- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ]. कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th October, 2004

S.O. 2749. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 143/ 92) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of B.B.M.B. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 4-10-2004 .

[No. L -42012 / 12/ 91 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer 7439

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

submitted by the parties . The petitioner in his statement stated as under :

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh, Presiding Officer.

Case No. ID 143/92

Date of Decision : 20-9-2004

Received on: 3-11-1991

Ramesh Kumar S/o . Sh. Khushal Chand, C/o . Sh. R. K. Singh Parmar , President , Nangal Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh, Nangal Township, Distt. Ropar .

... Petitioner

Versus

1. Chairman, Bhakra Beas Management Board, Sector - 19 -B, Madhya Marg , Chandigarh.

....Respondent

2. Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance Division (Power Wing) , B.B.M.B. , P.O. Power House, Delhi .

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman : Shri R. K. Singh

Ms. Neeru Chadha .

For the Management :

AWARD

The Government of India, on the recommendation ofconciliation officer referred the following matter for the adjudication of this Tribunal vide their No. L-42012/ 12/91 - IRDU, dt: 30-09-1991 :

3. Ramesh Kumar, workman deposed that he admits the contents of his affidavit and documents produced by him, as correct and the same are exhibited as Ex. Wl to Ex. W5 . When cross -examined he stated that he was placed under suspension and was also chargesheeted. He admitted his signatures on the documents exhibited as Ex.M1 and stated that he was working in the work charge capacity. He admitted that he had received subsistence allowance during the period of his suspension, but on the intervention of the court and admitted the contents of court order Ex . W6 . He further stated that before the termination of his services he was given show cause notice , but he does not remember whether, he had replied the same or not. However , he stated that he does not remember whether he had received the copy of the enquiry report or not. He alleged that he was not given full opportunity to defend and denied that the enquiry was conducted in accordance with the principle of natural justice and standing orders . He also denied that he was gainfully employed after 21-11-1978 . Sh. S. K. Bansal, SDO who appeared as witness for the management proved, as correct, his affidavit, placed on record and the documents filed therewith . All these documents were exhibited as Ex . M2 to M19 . In cross- examination he stated that the workman had given explanation to the chargesheet , but the same was rejected by the Disciplinary Authority. That he was not a witness in the enquiry, so he cannot say whether the order of rejecting the explanation is available or not, that he cannot say whether any presenting officer was appointed by the management. However, as per the office record the enquiry wasconducted properly and fairly and the same is placed on record. Copy of order is exhibited as Ex . M 20 .

"Whether the action of the Executive Engineer, BBMB , Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Ramesh Kumar , son of Shri Kushal Chand, w.e.f. 21-11-1978 is justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

4. In the statement of claim the workman claimed that he was engaged by respondent No. 2, as Line Man, in the work charge capacity, since 1970 and he continuously worked in that capacity up to the after - noon of21-11-1978, the day when his services were terminated by an illegal, bad and void order. That he was placed under suspension on 01-09-1976 , on a false and fictitious charge, which was also not properly served upon him . His reply to the charge was also rejected and he was served with a show cause notice and thereafter his services were terminated in a hire and fire manner, without holding proper enquiry and without the evidence of the parties , that he was not paid subsistence allowance during the period of suspension, therefore, he filed an application under Section 33 (C) , before the Presiding Officer , Labour Court, Rohtak who ordered the management to pay a sum ofRs . 1232/ -, as the subsistence allowance , at the rate of 50% of last wages , vide his order dt. 30-4-1978 , that he had filed a suit for declartion at Jalandhar , against his illegal termination from services on , 23-01-1981 , which 2.Notices were issued to the parties . The petitioner appeared through, his representative , Mr. R. K. Singh , whereas the management appeared through their representative on 18-12-1991 , on which day the workman filed his claim petition a copy of which was given to the management. The managment filed the written statement on 21-05-1992 . The petitioner was accorded an opportunity to file the replication , which he filed on 15-04-1993 . He filed his affidavit on 16-12-1992 on the day he filed replication , whereas the management filed the affidavit of Sh. S. K. Bansal , Assistant Executive Engineer, in support of their written statement . The parties filed photo copies of a number of documents including the documents and statements of witnesses , made before the Enquiry Officer. Both the petitioner and witness of the respondent Sh . S. K. Bansal proved the documents 7440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ]

6. On facts , it is stated by the management that the workman had worked on work charge capacity in the B.B.M.B. from the year 1970 to 21-01-1978 , when his services were terminated , according to the Certified Standing Orders ; that the workman was given full opportunitytodefend himself, before the termination. That the workman was suspended on the report of S.D.O. T/L Sub -Division, Balabhgarh and charge -sheet was served upon him. Thereafter, a proper enquiry was conducted by Mr. V. K. Gupta, the then Executive Engineer, O & M, Division , Panipat. That the workman was given full opportunity of his defence . That the Enquiry Officer had submitted his report on 31-08-1978 , holding that the chargeswere established against the workman. Thereafter, show cause notice was served upon the workman asking him to submit his reply within 20 days. The reply was received after the stipulated period, yet it was considered , but was not found satisfactory.

was decided by the said court on: 03-06-1986 . That, after the dismissal of suit , for want ofjurisdiction, he made representation to the respondents and even made an appeal to the Chairman, Bhakra Beas Management Board, but heard nothing from them for two years . It is in that contingency that he approached the Authority under the Labour Law, that this order of his termination is not a speaking order. The reply to the show cause notice was not considered properly, no enquiry was conducted nor the workman was accorded an opportunity of personal hearing, before the termination of the Services , that the authority did not act on the dictium of Certified Standing Orders/Model Standing Orders 1946. That the Executive Engineer was neither his appointing authority nor he could be punishing authority. Thus , the termination of the petitioner was bad, that he was not served with one month's office before his termination, therefore , also the termination is bad and is required to be declared so with further direction for his reinstatement in service , payment of full back -wages and continuity in service.

7. The management has further claimed that the services of the petitioner were terminated by following the provision of Certified Standing Orders . That the Executive Engineer is the appointing authority as well as the punishing authority. That the services of the workman were terminated and not retrenched, therefore, there was no question of giving him any notice . They have further alleged that the services of petitioner were terminated for his misconduct and misbehaviour with his superiors and the same was done after following the necessary formalities in terms of Certified Standing Orders .

8.Before I proceed to examine the case of the parties on merits, I would like to dispose of an application made by the management for summoning of the record which according to them is lying in the office of ALC (C), Rohtak. It is their case that on a call , the representative of the management appeared before the ALC (C) , Rohtak on 22-01-1991 and he was informed that the workman has prayed for closing the case as he has raised the same issue before the ALC (C) , Chandigarh . It is further claimed that the management had deposited the relevant record with the ALC (C ), Rohtak and a mention about that was also made in the departmental enquiry, when both the parties appeared before him; that certain basic record is lying with the Labour Commissioner Rohtak, which has not beenproduced in this case . The management has prayed for summoning the said record, so that the case is disposed offproperly.

9. On the record, I find that the workman has not filed objections to this application , though copy of it was given to him . Since the application has been made at the stage of final arguments it was decided that the application would be considered , on merits at the time of final arguments, which were heard on 17-06-2004 .

5. The management has opposed the claim of the petitioner, by raising preliminary objections and on the basis of their case stated on merit. It is their case that the present reference is bad in law since the reference has been made on the basis of failure of conciliation proceedings , which had been conducted in the absence of management : that conciliation officer was misguided by the workman , that on the notice issued by ALC( C) , Rohtak , the Executive Engineer concerned appeared before the ALC ( C) , Rohtak , who fixed the next date for 22-01-1991 . On the date next fixed for the proceedings it was told to the management that the workman has stated in writing to close the case as he had raised the same issue before the ALC ( C ) , Chandigarh and so the management should await for the notice, from the ALC( C ) , Chandigarh . That ALC ( C) , Chandigarh also issued notice to the management for the day ALC ( C) , Rohtak , had issued the notice . But in fact no notice was issued by ALC ( C) , Chandigarh to Executive Engineer, who had terminated the services of the petitioner and was a party. The date fixed in the notice was 03-01-1991 , on which day, it was told that the workman has closed his case at Rohtak and the next date was fixed for 22-01- 1991. However , the petitioner did not inform the management that the case is pending before the ALC ( C), Chandigarh . The case was also pending before the ALC( C) , Rohtak , where the management had appeared and in whose jurisdiction the case had arisen . That a registered notice was sent to the Chief Engineer and not to the parties , against whom the petitioner had raised the dispute. As such the respondents could not attended. Thus the parties did not appeared before the ALC ( C) , Chandigarh , since no proper notices were served upon them. Thus , the order of the Government is not proper since it was passed without hearing the management .

10. During the course of arguments the representative of the management admitted that they have 7441

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

orders ; that Executive Engineer was the appointing as well as the punishing authority, that the services were terminated on the grounds of misconduct and misbehaviour, with his superiors and the same was done after observing all the formalities.

not given detail of the documents , which were placed on the file of the ALC( C) , Rohtak and which were relevant to the matter in issue in these proceedings . As per their own statement they have produced the record in the case No. 811777/90 ACR dt . 30-12-1990 in which there were no proceedings after 22-01-1991 . In these about 14 years , the management did not take any steps to get the copies of that record so as to produce the same in these proceedings . Even today they do not have detail of that record nor they can say about the substance it contains . How then, the court can find out, whether documents, which the management wants me to summon are really relevant to the matter in issue before me . The management has no explanation to advance as why to they have slept over this matter all this period , although they have acknowledged that even before the Enquiry Officer, both the parties stated that certain record is on the file of the ALC( C) , Rohtak, which even before him they did not produce. The case is already very old and the occurrence is stated to have taken place some two decades ago . In the circumstances I feel no useful purpose shall be served if the application is allowed since the management itself is not sure as to what record they want to get summoned which will help in the disposal of his case . They must reap what they have shown . As such the application is rejected.

11. Now coming to the merits of the case , there is no dispute between the parties that the services of the workman were terminated on 21-11-1978. According to the management the workman was engaged in work- charged capacity, in the year 1970 , and he was continuously working till 21-11-1978 , the day, on which his services were terminated in accordance with the provisions of Certified Standing Orders of the BBMB, as applicable to the work charged staff. According to them, the workman was suspended on 01-09-1976, on the basis ofthe report of SDO , T/L, BBMB , Balabhgarh, that the workman was charge- sheeted vide their No. 153/C- 26 , dt. 08-02-1977, in accordance with clause 23 (5 ) of the Certified Standing Orders and thereafter a proper enquiry was conducted by Mr. V. K. Gupta, the then Executive Engineer , O & M, Division BBMB, Panipat that the workman was given full opportunity to defend himself, that as per the report of the Enquiry Officer the guilt of the official was proved and the charges were established against him . Thereafter , the workman was given show cause notice, asking him to submit his explanation which he sent after the expiry of the stipulated period of 21 days yet it was considered ; that after considering the reply of the workman the punishing authority held that the plea of the workman is not carried, therefore , services of the workman are dispensed with.

13. Alongwith their written statement , the management enclosed certain documents including photo copies of the charge sheet No. 153 /C- 25 , dt. 08-02-1977 , another charge sheet Memo No. 105/0-25, dt. 11-09-76 , statement of the charges which are not dated , another document which also shows the allegation against the workman, the report of the enquiry which comprises of six pages , the statements of the workman and that of Messers S. S. Gupta , S.E. , B. S. Sachdeva, AO& S , Om Parkash , Ragubir Singh, Sher Singh , J. R. Chandan, Sat Paul , Risal Singh , Maha Dev, Harjeet Singh, besides the final show cause notice by which the workman was directed to show cause as to why his services should not be terminated. The perusal of these documents show that Enquiry Officer did not prepare the memorandum of proceedings during the period the enquiry was conducted. It is also claimed that he recorded the statement of the petitioner, i.e. the workman and 10 other witnesses of the management on one day i.e. on 23-08-1978 . After going though the statements of the witnesses 1 find that there is nothing in record to suggest that the workman had cross- examined the witnesses ofthe management. In the absence of memorandum of proceedings , it cannot be made out whether the workman was given opportunity to cross- examine, the witnesses of the management or not . Even statements of the witnesses are recorded in the first form and there is nothing to show as to who was the presenting Officer and who produced those witnesses . The Enquiry Officer apparently recorded the statements in a composite manner. Even the statement of the workman is recorded in that manner without showing as to whether he was examined, by whom , and who cross - examined him . Statement of the workman contains , last line , where he is shown to have said that he was allowed to cross -question the witnesses of the management. But barring this statement , there is no evidence on the record to show that the workman had cross- examined the witnesses of the management and what questions he asked them and what was their reply. The statement of the witnesses of the management also do not contain any reference as to who examinedthem and what questions were put to them. They have vomited out a tutored versions . The recording of statement on the same day, further suggests that these were typed and signed by the witnesses , without perhaps their actually making the statements . It also speaks of the hurry in which the Enquiry Officer was to complete the enquiry on the same day. There is therefore , no evidence to show that the workman was given full opportunity to defend himself, both by putting questions to the witnesses of the management and by producing his own evidence.

12. The management has further claimed that the services of the workman were terminated, after observing thepre- requisite in accordance with the Certified Standing 7442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] The enquiry clearly seems to have been conducted with a premeditated mind without caring for principles of natural justice.

in law. As such the punishment awarded is quashed. In the pleadings of the management there is no prayer, that in case, this Tribunal comes to the conclusions that the enquiry conducted against the workman was not fair, they may be allowed to lead evidence , to show that the dismissal of the workman was justified, in view of his misconduct and misbehaviour with the superior officers . Since, there is no such prayer therefore , the management cannot be given, suo moto, permission for adducing fresh and additional evidence to prove that the dismissal of the workman wasjustified. In this regard I get the support of a Judgement of the Andhra Pradesh, High Court reported as 1995 ( 2 SCT 404) a photo copy of which is placed on record.

14. The workman alleged that he was not even served with the charge sheet by the management well in time and the copy of the charge sheet was provided to him just before the start of the enquiry. It is also on record that the management did not provide subsistence allowance to the workman during the course of his suspension which also includes the period when the enquiry was conducted and it was only on the intervention of the Labour Court that the subsistence allowance was paidto him . The order of suspension as noted in the service book of the workman shows the mind of the competent authority, as he ordered that the workman, during the period of suspension, shall perform duties , but he shall not be paid any wages and allowances. Such an order was clearly against the service rules and principles of natural justice . All this shows that enquiry conducted against the workman was not fair . There is no evidence on record to show that the workman was provided with the opportunity to cross - examine the witnesses of the management and was allowed to produce the evidence in his defence . Even the Enquiry Officer does not seems to have taken pains to verify whether the claim , made by the workman , against the allegation, which gave cause for the enquiry, were genuine or not . I am therefore , of the opinion that the punishment imposed on the basis of such an enquiry is not legal and justified.

16. There is ample evidence on record to show; that the preceding the date of dismissal of the workman, on the basis of departmental enquiry, he had put in continuous service for 240 days , and that before doing that the management did not follow the provisions of Section 25- F, as they did not issue any notice of termination nor paid retrenchment compensation to the workman, they also did not inform the Appropriate Government about the retrenchment of the workman. In the circumstances they violated in letter and spirit, the provision of the Industrial Disputes Act . On this count also the termination of workman from service is held to be bad in law and for the reasons stated earlier the workman is treated to be in service as if there was no order of his dismissal from service . It is further held that the workman is entitled to full back-wages with continuity in service and all other benefits as if he continued in service all this period . The award is passed in these terms; that the action of the Executive Engineer , BBMB , Delhi in terminating the services of Ramesh Kumar S/ o Kushal Chand w.e.f. 21-11-1978 was not justified and he is treated to be in service all through this period subject to his age of superannuation. He is also held to be entitled to full back- wages, continuity in service and all other service benefits . Let the copy of this award be sent to Government of India for necessary action and the file be consigned in record after due completion.

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer .

नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2750.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं . एल-12012/183/2001- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] 15. After due consideration of the evidence , placed on record, by the parties , I am of the considered opinion that the management did not conduct a proper and fair enquiry against the workman, since the workman was not provided with proper opportunity to produce his evidence and to cross -examine the witnesses of the management. The Enquiry Officer further failed in his duty to examine , enquire into the defence of the workman so as to reach the just conclusion in the matter. The manner in which the enquiry was completed, in a day itself shows that the conducting of the enquiry was only to cover up the working of the mind of the management , so as to punish the workman. Even the order of suspension passed by the Executive Engineer , a photo copy of which is on record, shows the mala fide in the mind of the authority, placing workman under suspension , as he categorically directed, that during the period of suspension the workman shall work but he will not be paid wages or allowances. In that case how the management expected the workman to survive and also take effective part in the enquiry proceeding . The law is settled where the workman could not effectively defend himself in the enquiry, as he was not paid the subsistence allowance , the enquiry was held to be bad in law. Considering all these situations I hold that the enquiry against the workman was not fair and proper, therefore , the punishment based thereon is bad

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव 7443 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004

S.O. 2750.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 6/2002 of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05-10-2004.

[No. L- 12012/183/2001 - IR(B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT "SHRAM SADAN " III MAIN, III CROSS , II PHASE , TUMKUR ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR , BANGALORE-560022

Dated: 28th September 2004

PRESENT:

Shri A. R. Siddiqui, Presiding Officer.

C. R. No. 6/2002

II PARTY

I PARTY

Shri M. Praveenchandra The Deputy Manager, Canara Bank Circle Office, MANGALORE - 575003

name having been sponsored through Employment Exchange .He worked in the said capacity for over 7 years atvarious branches ofthe Second Party Bank in Mangalore circle.He discharged his duties very honestly and sincerely and some of the branch managers of the Second Party had recommended to appoint him on regular basis as sub- staff in the existing vacancies . Later on, his services were regularised w.e.f. 8-12-97 and he was posted as sub -staff atthe Market Road Branch, Mangalore . However, after regularization of his services , the first party was being harassed by the second party bank levelling against him all types ofvague, flimsy, frivolous and baseless allegations with the sole intention to terminate his services by hook or crook; that there was no show cause notice or charge sheet issued to the first party nor enquiry was held against him while terminating his services. Therefore , he is without any work from 8-9-1998 and on account of termination ofservices, a stigma has been attached to his career; that the first party comes from a poor scheduled caste family ofDakshina Kannada District and his efforts through the All India Canara Bank SC/ ST Employees Association and also through the good offices of the officials ofthe Labour department to get himself reinstated in service have failed due to recalcitrant attitude of the management ; that the action of the Second Party is arbitrary, illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice so also in violation of the provisions of Canara Bank Service Code ; that even if the first party is guilty of any misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance then again the punishment of terminating his service is shockingly disproportionate therefore , the termination order is liable 10 be set aside and he is entitled to be reinstated in service .

S/o late Shri B. Manju , Near Pump House , Koikude Village & Post, HALEANGADI- 574146

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub -section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order. No. L- 12012/ 183 (IR (B - II ) dated 16th January 2002 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank, Circle Office , Mangalore , in terminating the services of Shri Praveenchandra M, Ex . Sub -staff, Canara Bank , Market Road Branch, Mangalore w.e.f. 8-9-1998 , during the period of probation is justified ? If not, what relief the said workman is entitled to ?"

3. The management while filing its Counter Statement resisted the claim of the first party, however, admitting the fact that he was appointed as a probationary Peon as per the order dated 25-11-97 and he joined the services ofthe bank on 8-12-97 and was posted at Market Road Branch , Mangalore . It was contended that during the aforesaid period of probation the performance of the first party was not satisfactory, during the period of probation initially fixed for six months and therefore, it was extended by 3 months as per the bank proceedings dated 23-5-98 giving an opportunity to the first party to improve his work performance . However, he did not improve his work performance despite the suitable counselling by the Manager Incharge of the Branch and therefore, the bank decided not to confirm services of the firstparty and accordingly he was terminated from service vide proceedings dated 7-9-1998 . While denying the allegation of the first party that he was initially appointed as Peon in June 1990, the management contended that the first party was brought on the panel of daily wagers list and was engaged intermittently on daily wage basis in the leave vacancy of sub staff and thereafter he was 2. The case of the first party as made out in his Claim statement in brief is that he was appointed by the Second Party as a Peon initially in the month of June 1990 on daily wages in the vacancy reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates. He was selected after interview. His

3139 G1/04-45 7444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

The proceedings stand abated and accordingly reference is rejected.

appointed as a Probationary Peon during the year 1997. It was contended that since the services of the first party were nor confirmed for the reasons narrated above , hence the question of issue of charge sheet against him or holding an enquiry before terminating the services did not arise. Therefore, the management requested the court to dismiss the reference.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 28th September 2004)

A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer

नईदिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2751.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/96) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/299/95- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004

S.O. 2751.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/96) of the Central. Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on05-10-2004.

4. In response to the notices issued by this Tribunal to the parties , they appeared before this tribunal through counsels. Learned counsel Shri Eric Sequeira appeared for the first party and whereas the learned counsel , Shri T.R.K. Prasad represented the management . On 8-4-2002 Claim Statement was filed by the first party and the matter came up for filing of the Counter Statement and that was doneby the management on 4-10-2002 . Thereafter case came to be adjourned for evidence to be led on behalf of the second party management . After a gap of about one year period (court remained vacant for want of posting of Presiding Officer) when the case was taken up for hearing on 10-3-2004, both the parties as well as their counsels remained absent. On 19-4-2004 again there was no representation on behalf of the parties . Thereafter a notice was taken against the first party seeking his appearance before this tribunal (Mangalore Camp ) . However, the notice issued to him under RPAD returned unserved with a report that " the addressee (first party ) expired" . Then the court thought it proper to take notice against the learned counsel Shri Eric Sequeira who was representing the first party. Unfortunately he remained absent before this tribunal despite the services of the notice . On 21-9-04, when the matter was taken up for evidence to be led on behalf of the Second party, learned counsel representing it, filed a memo to close the proceedings as 'abated' and hence the case posted for award.

[No. L- 12012/299/ 95 - IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh, Presiding Officer. Case No. I.D. No. 9/96 Date of Decision 23-9-2004

Ved Parkash,

Ex-Clerk,

Central Bank of India,

G.T. Road, Karnal

Workman.

Versus

1. Central Bank of India, through Chairman and Managing Director, Central Office, Chandermukhi Nariman Point, Bombay

2. RegionalManager, Central Bank of India . Regional Office, 106, Metro Motor Building, Ambala Cantt .

5. As noted above, the notice sent to the first party by registered post returned unserved on 11-6-04 and thereafter notice issued to his advocate though was served, he failed to respond. As seen above the first party failed to appear before this tribunal to prosecute the proceeding as he was reported to be dead vide postal endorsement referred to supra. As noted above, learned counsel for the management has filed memo to close the proceedings as ' abated' as no steps were taken by the LRs of the first macy to come on record and to prosecute the proceedings. Ascould be seen from the records, notice issued to the firstparty returned unserved by this tribunal on 11-6-04. As on 21-9-04 when the learned counsel for the Second Party filed a memo , period of 3 months to bring LRs on record had already expired. Even as on today there is nobody representing the first party much less his LRsto give life to the proceedings . Therefore, this Tribunal is left with no alternative but to give due weightage to the memo filed by the Second Party to close the proceedings as' abated' . Hence the following Award:

3. Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India , Zonal Office, Chandigarh ......Respondents 7445 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

APPEARANCES :

: Shri J.S. Rana

case may be decided on the basis of written arguments and the oral submission made by the counsel for the parties.

For the workman

: Shri H.C. Arora

For the management

2. The reference , which is required to be adjudicated upon by this Tribunal reads as under :-

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in dismissing the services of Shri Ved Prakash , Ex - Clerk , is proportionate to the misconduct committed by the workman or not ? If not , what relief is he entitled and from what date ?"

3. The bare perusal of this reference shows that its extent is limited to the amount of punishment awarded to the workman, which pre - supposes that the parties have not disputed the facts leading to alleged occurrence , fairness of departmental enquiry, held against the workman, and the amount of punishment awarded to him, by the punishing authority and confirmed by the Appellate Authority. However, the question, which is required to be considered by this Tribunal , cannot be answered without making a reference to the facts of the case , the departmental proceedings conducted in the matter, the conclusions arrived at by the Enquiry Officer, the punishment awarded by the punishing authority and the order of the Appellate Authority.

4. Stated in brief, the facts are that the workman was posted as Clerk in the respondent bank at Karnal, when the Regional Manager , Ambala Cantt. served upon him the charge sheet which reads as under:

(i) On 06-06-1991 while working in the current account department , he with a mala fide intentions , fraudulently altered the closing balance in the account ofM/ s Mehfil Restaurant from Rs . 1367/07 to Rs . 6367/07 . He made this alteration by altering the figure of ' 1 ' in the said balance to ' 6' . Further , in the same account, on 28-06-91 , he corrected the closing balance from Rs . 5997/07 to Rs . 297/07 , by authenticating it with forged initials of Checking Officer, so that the fraudulent alteration, made by him on 06-06-91 , does not come in the picture, while jotting and tallying the balarices of said ledger, for the month of June 1991. In this way he , with a mala fide intentions accommodated the said party unauthorisedly in a fraudulent manner , which is prejudicial to the interest of the Bank and for which he is charged with gross misconduct under para 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement.

(ii) On 02-07-91 , in the same account i.e. in the account of Mehfil Restaurant, he with a mala fide intention, with some ulterior motive, made a superfluous credit entry ofRs. 8000 (Rs . Eight thousand only) and increased the closing 1. This is a reference , received from Government of India, vide their letter No. L- 12012/299 / 95 /I.R(B -3 ) , which was received in this Tribunal on 09-01-96. It was directed to be entered in the concerned register and notices were issuedto the parties who appeared on 15-02-96 . The workman filed the claim statement on that day, a copy of which was given to the management . The management took time to file the written statement. In this between , as per the record, fresh claim statement was filed by the workman on 02-12-98 and the management filed written statement thereof on 23-12-94 . The workman filed rejoinder on 10-11-2000. In support of his claim the worker filed his affidavit on 14-07-2000 , whereas the management tendered the affidavit of their Regional Manager, S. L. Doda on 02-02-2002 . The management also placed on record photo copies of the charge sheet, statement of the workman and that of witnesses produced by them such as Sh. S.K. Jain , Sh. B.K. Bhatia, Sh . P.C. Mittal, Sh . M.K. Verma, as made by them in the enquiry. Besides the photo copy of the proceedings in the enquiry and the findings , have also been placed on record along with the final show cause memo issued to the workman, the order of the Appellate Authority. It is worthwhile to note that on 07-08-2001 , the workman appeared through his counsel Sh. J.S. Rana, when none was present for the management . Mr. Rana submitted before the Court that no evidence is required to be recorded in these proceedings , since the reference pertains only to the question of quantum ofpunishment awarded to the workman and this Tribunal has to retum the finding , whether the punishment awarded is proportionate to the misconduct committed by the workman or not and if not, to what relief the workman is entitled to. According to him this question canbe decided after hearing the parties . It seems the court agreed with the counsel of the workman and directed that the matter be put up for arguments but the order, which was passed subsequently on the same day, shows that the opposite side did not agree with the counsel for the workman and desired to submit the affidavits of non- applicants . The Court , however , did not agree with them and directed that the management shall produce the record on the next date . The parties produced the affidavits , besides the copies of the enquiry proceedings . Vide its order dt . 20-06-2003 , the court directed that the matter be put up for arguments . The workman filed the written arguments on 11-09-2003 . The Court awaited for the arguments of the management and the counsel for the management submitted oral arguments in presence of the counsel for the workman , who replied the oral arguments ofthe counsel for the management and submitted that the 7446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926- [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)]

He further admitted that an enquiry was conducted against him, but with biased mind and alleged that the 'Disciplinary Authority ' made mistake in dismissing him from the service and the order so passed is illegal and bad. He raised other grounds to challenge the orders of the Disciplinary Authority and submitted that the order of the Disciplinary Authority is violative of mandatory provisions of clause 19.12 (c) ofBipartite Settlement, dated 19-10-96 .

balance in the said account from Rs . 1457.07 to Rs . 9457.07 , by way altering the figure of ' 1 ' to ' 9 ' . After that, before proceeding for training on 08-08-91 , he corrected the closing balance , in the said account, from Rs . 9197.72 to Rs. 1197.72, by authenticating it with the forged initials of Checking Officer , so that the above unauthorized and fraudulent alteration, made by him, does not come in the picture. Further while jotting the balance of said ledger, on 30-07-91 , he deliberately jotted the balance of said account as Rs . 1045.72 instead of Rs . 9045.72, as appearing in the account on said date, so that the balances may tally and fraudulent alteration, done by him on 02-07-91 , may not come into the knowledge of other Branch Officials, which clearly establishes his mala fide intention in all the above said fraudulent alterations done by him

For these acts , done with mala fide intention, by which he accommodated the party unauthorisedly and which are prejudicial to the interest of the Bank, he is charged with gross misconduct under para 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement .

6. The workman has also challenged the decision of the Disciplinary Authority and that of the Appellate Authority, on a number of grounds as detailed in the statement of claim . Taking the support of Authority of Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of S.L. Loona Vs.Punjab National Bank, 1992, Domestic Enquiry Law General, it is alleged by the workman that the order of the Appellate Authority is required to be vitiated in the light of the said Judgement, since he was also not provided with an opportunity of personal hearing, before his appeal was disposed off. He further alleged that the Zonal Manager has appointed him whereas the Regional Manager, who is lower in rank has dismissed him . So far that reason also the order of the Regional Manager is bad in law. In the end the workman has prayed for setting aside the order of penalty of dismissal , in the exercise of powers conferred under Section 11 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further prayed that he be reinstated with full back wages , continuity in service and with all other consequence benefits .

7. The perusal ofthe statement of claim shows that the workman has tried to broad based the scope of the present proceedings and thereby has tried to extend the terms of reference , which is not permissible .

( iii) On 13-07-91 when a cheque No. 049251 dated 13-09-91 for Rs . 1587 drawn on above said account i.e. Mehfil Restaurant , was presented for payment, he with a mala fide intentions , with some ulterior motives, mentioned balance of the said account over the cheque as Rs . 2929.37 whereas balance in fact, at that time, in the account , was only Rs . 929.37 . Further while debiting the said cheque of Rs . 1587 in the account, he did not derive the resultant debit balance in the account so as to conceal his above said fraudulent action. Later on, at the time of close of public hours, on the said date , he himself deposited Rs. 1000 in the account, as is evident from the pay - in -slip of said date , so that overdraft is not created in the account and his above fraudulent and unauthorized accommodation of the party,does not come into the knowledge of the concerned Branch Officials " .

5. The workman , in his statement of claim , admitted charges one and two before the Enquiry Officer to the extent that he had made the alterations in the account ofM/s Mehfil Restaurant without mala fide intentions . He claimed that charge three is not admitted by him, that hehad admitted charge " I and 2 " with the understanding that such an admission will not warrant his dismissal from service , in the light of his unblemished past service record.

8. The management has opposed the claim of the workman and has raised preliminary objections to the maintainability of the reference. They submit that the workman has not brought the facts to the notice of the court honestly and has tried to conceal them . He has made false and frivolous charges , which are scandalous in nature. According to them , the workman has admitted the charges, levelled against him . Now it does not lie in his mouth to raise finger against that . The workman was provided with the opportunity of personal hearing both by the Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority. The principles of natural justice were fully complied with. Rebutting the allegations , made by the workman in the statement of claim and then in his affidavit, it is submitted by the management that a fair and proper enquiry was held against the workman and during the enquiry all the procedure was followed, the principles of natural justice were respected; and that in the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the admission of the workman, the charges against the workman were proved. Therefore, hewas awarded the punishment, which is under challenge.

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

9. The workman in his written statement admitted thatthe controversy between the parties is only with regard to the proportionality of the punishment of dismissal handed over to him . He has challenged the legality of the punishment on the grounds ; that

(i) The applicant - workman did not derive any financial benefit from the act attributed to him in the charges .

(ii ) The punishment of dismissal has been awarded in violation of mandatory provision ofclause 19.12(c) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-96 that imposed upon the Disciplinary Authority a duty to check the past record ofthe workman and other extenuating circumstances .

I shall first take up the ground of violation of provisions of clause 19.12 (c) of the Bipartite Settlement, dated 19.10.96 , which reads as under :

" 19.12 (C ). In awarding punishment by way of disciplinary action, the authority concerned shall take into account the gravity of the misconduct, the previous record, if any, of the employees and any other aggravating or extenuating circumstances, that may exist" .

This provision has enjoined upon the Disciplinary Authority to take into account the :

(i ) Gravity of the misconduct ;

(ii) Previous record of the delinquent official and any other aggravating or extenuating circumstance that may exist .

10. If we go back to the charge sheet the report of the Enquiry Officer, photocopies of which are on record, it is shown that the workman was charged with many instances of tampering with the record of the Bank. He was alleged to have altered the closing balance in the account of M/s . Mehfil Restaurant on 06-06-91 from Rs . 1377.07 to Rs . 6367.07 , thereby he raised the balance ofthe concerned party by altering the figure " 1 to 6 " and thereby helped the said party to gain. On 28-06-91 he again altered the balance account of the said party and charged it to Rs . 297.07 from Rs . 5997.07 and in doing that he forged the initials of Checking Officer , so as to cover up his lapse made on 06-06-91 , On 02-07-91 he again raised the closing balance of M/s . Mehfil Restaurant , named above , from Rs. 1457.07 to Rs . 9457.07 , by altering figure " 1 to 9 " . On 08-08-91 he again altered the figures in the account ofthe said party and lower down the balance to Rs. 1197.72 from Rs . 9197.72 and in doing that he forged the initials of Checking Officer, while authenticating the change . On 30-07-91 he recorded the balance ofM/s . Mehfil Restaurant as Rs . 1045.72 whereas

7447 in the account the balance was Rs . 9045.72 , so as to cover up his earlier fraudulent action done on 02-07-91 .

11. Further allegations against the workman is that on 13-07-91 he raised the closing balance of M/s . Mehfil Restaurant to Rs . 2929.37 whereas the said party had only abalance of Rs . 929.37. On that day he apparently did so, so as to help the said concerned to get their cheque worth for Rs. 1587 en -cashed . He purposedly did not show the resultant debit balance , but later on deposited an amount ofRs . 1000 himself so that overdraft is not created against the account of said party and his conduct is not exposed.

12. As stated above the workman admitted the charges of commission of alteration/forgery by him on 06-06-91, 02-07-91 , 08-08-91 , and 30-07-91 . During the enquiry the 3 charge of his misconduct on 13-07-91 and thatof depositing the amount of Rs . 1000 so as to cover his act of misconduct , were proved to be true . From the events proceedings the departmental enquiry, against the workman, clearly suggested that the workman had made the alterations with full conscious mind and as per the report ofthe enquiry the same was done to help M/s . Mehfil Restaurant , in getting their cheques encashed without creating overdraft on their head . The workman admitted this fact in his statement before the Enquiry Officer and the explanation he advanced was in the manner that since the concernedparty was a good customer ofthe respondent Bank, therefore , he did the alterations so as to accommodate them. He , however, has not shown as to who had authorized him to do that . If he had that good intentions why he did not bring the matter to the notice of his superior officers and then why he tried to cover up his misconduct by committing further misconduct , which was clearly to cover up his actions so as to screen the same from the sight of his superior officers in the Bank. There is absolutely no extenuating circumstance to show that theworkman had good intentions to help the customer of the Bank.

13. The workman has failed to bring on record any evidence to show that his previous conduct was unblemished ; that he was a sincere and faithful servant of the Bank . As regards the gravity of misconduct, it is grave and serious , perhaps it was good luck of the Bank that his misconduct was spotted and he was proceeded against, otherwise encouraged by his deeds , he could have done any bigger misconduct and fraud so as to dupe his employer or the customers of his employer.

14. There is no merit in the claim that since the workman did not derive any monetary benefit from his conduct, therefore , the punishment awarded to him cannot be justified. It is not the question of monetary benefits , which are important. What is important is the trust that the customers impose in the financial institutions and the banks stand at the top of the list. Though they give less interest on the deposits than the other financial 7448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 93/ 93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Chandigarh as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of L.I. C. of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 05-10-2004 .

[No. L- 17012 /10/ 92 - IR (B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

) CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh , Presiding Officer.

Case No. L.D. No. 93/93

Date of Decision 23-9-2004

Raj Kumar

institutions , the customers still make deposits in the banks since they feel that their money is secure. It is like that it is in their pocket , without taking the pain to case for it . If employees of the banks , like petitioner, start meddling with their accounts , where shall go their trust . The courts have taken strict view in such matters and a reference to the Judgement of the Delhi High Court reported in the case ofDelhi State Transport Corporation Vs. N.L. Kakarh reported as 2004, Labour and Industrial Cases 2312 can be made with advantage . In that case the Bus Conductor had not issued the tickets worth 5 paise to each of the three of the passengers but three tickets were found lying in the bus which were not properly punched , which suggested that the conductor had taken the money but had not issued the tickets and finding the Checking Staff, he threw three tickets in the bus , so as to claim that he had issued the tickets. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi did not get impressed by the fact that the amount involved was very meager therefore , the punishment of dismissal was bad. They rejected the claim of the workman and upheld the punishment of dismissal from service .

C/o Shri Arun Ghai ,

Β.ΧΙ , 1662 ,

Rari Mohalla,

Ludhiana

......Applicant

Versus

Respondent

1. Senior Divisional Manager , Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jivan Parkash, Sector 17 - B , Chandigarh ......

APPEARANCES :

For the workman

: Shri Karam Singh

: Shri R.S. Longia

For the management

15. In the present case the position is worse. Here the petitioner was entrusted with the job of dealing with lacs of rupees of the customers of the Bank . The manner he made the alterations and then the manipulations to cover his action, clearly shows his guilty mind . In my opinion he deserved no leniency and the punishment awarded was proportionate to the misconduct , he committed while serving as an employee of the Bank . The reference is answered holding that the action of the management of Central Bank of India in dismissing the services of Sh . Ved Prakash , Ex - Clerk was proportionate to the misconduct committed by him and he is entitled to no relief. Let the copy of this award be sent to the Central Govt. for necessary action and the file be consigned to record after due completion.

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2752.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल. आई. सी. ऑफ. इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -17012/ 10/92- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004 S.O. 2752. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central AWARD

The reference No. L- 17012 / 10/92 - IR(B.II ) dated 27th of August 1993 made under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act. ) received from Govt . of India reads as under :

"Whether the action of the Senior Divisional Manager , L.I.C. of India Chandigarh in terminating the services of Shri Raj Kumar , Peon w.e.f. 29-5-1987 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date ?"

The petitioner, in response to notices , filed claim petition on 27-1-1994 and submitted that the respondents terminated him from the service without following procedure laid down by the law as he had put in 319 days of service , before the termination of his service ; that after his appointment he was put on probation for six months and the same was over at the time of his discharge ; that at the time of joining his services he had submitted all the required certificates which made him eligible for the post, he was given and the management discharged him from 7449

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004 /कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

the service without following the law and the principle of natural justice .

Contesting the claim of the workman , as made in para 1 of his claim statement , it is contended by the management that the particulars and eligibility criteria of the workman were not verified before the written test . It was only when he was called for medical examination on 10-7-1986, that he was asked to produce original certificates as a proof of his date of birth to be shown to the medical officer at the time of his confirmation that the appointment letter was issued on the basis of information supplied by the workman . Further it was made a condition in the appointment letter that the workman would be on probation, which could be extended further for six months and that the workman shall be governed by the Staff Regulations ; that the question of verification of age and educational qualifications were under consideration even before , so as to examine his case for confirmation in service and it was at that time found that he has not passed his 9th class standard examination from the recognized school , which was basic for appointment onthe post, therefore , he was discharged from the service ; that the workman never disclosed that he had not passed 9th class examination from a recognized school and so did not possess basic qualification . Since the workman was not qualified for the post, therefore , he was discharged from the service and in view of that, the petition is not maintainable. That the discharge had been done during the probation period , therefore, the workman did not acquire the status of a permanent employee .

The management opposed the claim, by filling their written statement in which they raised preliminary objection to the maintainability of the petition stating that the petition is bad for latches since the services of the workman were terminated on 23rd of May 1987 whereas he approached the conciliation authority on 13-10-1992, without explaining the delay of five and half years; that in term of clause 5 of the appointment letter and regulation 14(4) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India Staff Regulation, 1960 , for short 'Regulations ' the workman was liable to be discharged from the service during the probation period, without notice and without assigning any cause ; that the workman was discharged from service during the probation period since he did not possess the required qualification of having passed 9th standard from the Government recognized school as was notified in the Employment notice . In view of that, the termination of the services of the workman cannot be termed as retrenchment and the workman is not entitled to any benefits u/s. 25F of the I.D. Act for short "Act" that the services of the workman were governed by the provisions of L.I.C. of India (Staff) Regulations 1960 and the same were deemed to be rules framed by the Central Govt. under Section 48 ( 2) ( cc) , after the amendment of L.I.C. Act in 1981 ; that the said rule had the effect notwithstanding the Act or any other law, any agreement, settlement, award or other instruments for the time being in force . Thus the workman cannot take the benefit of provisions of Section 2(oo) and Section 25F of the Act.

The workman filed rejoinder, after the filing of written statement by the management and submitted that his claim is not belated as the workman had made numerous representations against his illegal termination ; that the workman possessed the required qualification , therefore , management had no justification to discharge him from the service , that since the workman was a workman as defined by the Act , therefore , it was incumbent upon , the employer to discharge the obligations , put on him, by the Act . On merits , the workman has claimed that the period of his probation was never extended as he never received any notice in that regard; that the workman had completed all the formalities before he was given the appointment otherwise the same would have been refused to him; that the grounds of his discharge have been concocted, just to relieve him of thejob. He again prayed for deciding the matter in his favour.

It has been noted earlier that the workman filed his affidavit, which has been exhibited as Ex. W1 , another his affidavit is Ex. W2 . The management has also filed the affidavit of Smt . Manju Jain , AAO . They have also placed on record the employment notice Ex. M1 , copy of the application of the workman Ex. M3 (A) , school leaving certificate of workman Ex . M3 , notice to the workman Ex. M4 , another notice Ex . M5 , next notice Ex . M6 , a document showing the address of the G. V. School On merits , the management has claimed that the workman was discharged from service under the law since he was discharged during the period of probation and in terms of appointment letter . Admitting that the workman was initially put on probation for six months , but the probation period got extended in the absence of an order of his confirmation as provided by clause 5 of the appointment letter and in terms of Regulation 14 (3 ) ; that no letter of confirmation of his services was issued by the management , rather during the verification of his age and educational qualification , so as to examine his case for confirmation in service , it was found that the workman has not passed 9th standard from the Govt . or Govt . recognized school ; thus he did not possess required qualification, as per terms of advertisement notice . That the workman produced a certificate having passed 9th class examination, as a proof of his qualification , but after his appointment it was found that he had passed 9th class examination from G. V. Vidyalaya Sector- 24 , Chandigarh which was not a recognized institution . There upon he was issued notice and in his reply he did not deny the fact. Therefore the competent authority discharged him from service during the period of his probation.

7450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Ex. M7 , notice dt . 11-03-87 Ex . M8 , Hindi version of notice dt. 11-03-87 Ex. M9 , reply of workman Ex. M10, a letter of Senior Manager to the Head Master G. V. Vidyalaya, Sector- 24 -D, Chandigarh Ex. M11 , another letter to the same Head Masterdt . 09-02-87 Ex. M12 , letter dt . 06-04-87 to D.E.O. , Chandigarh Administration Ex . M13 , letter of D.E.O. , Chandigarh Administrationto the name ofManager respondent management Ex . M14 , list of recognized and aided schools under the Education Department of Chandigarh Administration Ex . M15 , office order of Senior Divisional Manager of respondent corporation Ex . М16 .

1 have gone through the pleadings of the parties and the copies of the documents placed on record by them.

The facts, which emerge out from the pleadings of the parties and the documents placed on record , are that in response to the employment notice dt. 03-08-85, issued by the Senior Divisional Manager , Life Insurance Corporation of India , Chandigarh. The workman Raj Kumar submitted his application for appointment on the facts stated therein and the particulars given by him in his application dt . 13-12-85 , exhibited as Ex . M3 -A, he attached a copy of school leaving certificate Ex . Ml with the application in support of his claim . There is no dispute that he was appointed and he joined his duties on 16-07-86 . The terms and conditions on which the workman was appointed were contained in the appointment letter dt . 11-07-86 and exhibited as Ex. M5 , which read as under :

" 1. With reference to your application dated 13-12-85 and interview, we are pleased to offer you hereby the post of a PEON in the Scale of Rs . 430-10-450-20-790 at Ludhiana III office ofthe Corporatrion . Your initial basic pay will be Rs . 430 per month only.

2. Over and above the basic salary mentioned in para 1 above, you will be paid such allowances as may be applicable to the employees of the Corporation from time to time.

3. Your appointment shall be governed by the Staff Regulations of the Corporation and by such instructions and/or orders that may be issued to you both orally and in writing. This offer of appointment being made is subject to result of Reference No. NT. BI of 1985 before the Hon'ble National Industrial Tribunal .

4. You will be on probation for a period of Six Months from the date of your joining duties in terms of this letter of appointment.

5. During the probationary period, which may be extended by another six months , you are liable to be discharged without notice and without any

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] causewhatsoever being assigned to you for such discharge.

6. Your daily working hours will be 74 hours excluding lunch interval on all week days except Saturdays and 4½ hours on Saturdays . Subject to this limit , your actual working hours will be prescribed by the Office from time to time.

7. If more than one shift is worked, you will be liable to be transferred from one shift to another.

8. You shall not be entitled to get any traveling allowance for taking up your duties at the place , where you are now being posted.

9. You are liable to be transferred anywhere in India where the Corporation has its offices .

10. You will not be allowed to undertake any part- time studies unless sanctioned in writing by the authority competent to give such permission. Any pursuance of the part -time studies , if permitted , shall always be subject to office exigencies and no claim for leave for preparation shall be made on the ground that such part - time studies were undertaken by you on or prior to your joining the Corporation or that permission was given for the same by the authority competent to do so .

11. The appointment is offered to you on the basis of the information given by you in your application dt . 13-12-85 that you have not passed Matric/ SSC or equivalent examination. If, in the meantime , you have appeared and/ or passed Matric/ SSC or its equivalent examination, you should let us have the full particulars of the examination passed before accepting this offer of appointment . Please note that in case it comes to the notice of the Corporation anytime that you had passed Matric/ SSC or equivalent examination before the date of this letter your services with the Corporation will be terminated and terminal benefits , ifany, accrued to you will be forefeited.

12. If the terms herein offered are acceptable to you , you are required to report for duty to the office of the Corporation stated in para 1 above immediately and in any event not later than 15 days from the date of this letter" .

The grievance of the workman is that his services were terminated by the respondent management on 23-05-87 without following the provision of Act and the Rules . As against to it the claim of the management is that the appointment of the workman was on probation for a period of six months ; and that after the expiry of 7451

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

that period the services of the workman were not confirmed; thatby the order of the appointment the period ofprobation could be extended for another Six months , which got extended by virtue of the appointment order, since the services of the workman were not confirmed; that before the expiry of the next term of the probation order, it was revealed that the workman did not possess required qualification as were notified in the employment notice, therefore , the services of the workman were not confirmed . The management, after examining the documents andtestimonials , submitted by the workman, they came to the conclusion that the workman did not possess school leaving certificate of 9th pass, issued by a Government recognized school , so, he was not eligible for appointment as PEON in the Life Insurance Corporation. Therefore , he was discharged from service.

The employment notice is on record and exhibited as Ex . M1 . It reads as under :--

"Applications are invited from eligible candidates to be sponsored by Employment Exchange only for about 20 posts ofpeons for offices ofthe Corporation under Chandigarh Division, situated in the States ofHimachal Pradesh, Haryana and parts ofPunjab *and Sainik Boards for Ex- Servicemen Category" .

1. EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS :

Candidates must have passed IX Standard Examination from a government or government recognized school . Candidates who have passed Matriculation Examination with less than 55% marks in the aggregate can also be considered.

ForEx - Servicemen , who have put in atleast 3 years service in the Armed Forces , the minimum education qualification shall be a pass in Standard VII . Knowledge of driving Light Vehicle shall be an additional qualification, but not essential.

2. AGE:

Must have attained 18 years of age , but must not have attained 25 years of age as on 1-8-1985 . The upper age limit is relaxable by 5 years in case of candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes. The upper age limit as also relaxable by 10 years in case of candidates , who are physically handicapped subject to proving their disability to the satisfaction of the Corporation . In case of Ex- Servicemen , the upper age limit is relaxable to the extent ofperiod of service in the Armed Forces plus 3years.

3. RESERVATION OF POSTS :

12%

Scheduled Castes

5% (i)

(ii) Scheduled Tribes

27%

(

iii) Ex-servicemen/Disabled Ex-Servicemen

3139 G1/04-46

(Onlythose sponsored and dependents ofpersonnel killed in action . by Rajya/Zila Sainik Boards will be considered)

(iv) Physically handicapped persons 3%

(Postswill be reserved as per actual points in the roster).

4. PAY AND ALLOWANCES :

Pay Scale: Rs . 430-10-450-20-790 & other allowances admissible , from time to time .

5. SELECTION : The applicant who satisfy the above eligibility conditions shall have to appear in theWritten Test comprising of one paper of the 9th Standard level in regional language of the candidate i.e. Hindi or Punjabi. Candidates , who qualify the testwill be called for interview thereafter. The time and venue of the Written Test and Interview will be notified later on.

The candidates , who fulfil the above eligibility conditions should submit their biodata on the plain paper on a proforma given below, to the Employment Exchange and Sainik Boards concerned who will sponsor them . The concerned Employment Exchange are requested to send the applications duly sponsored by themby 3 IstAugust, 1985 .

Application for the post of Peon

1. Full Name:

2. Father's name:

3. Mailing Address:

4. Permanent Address :

5. Date of Birth :

6. Place ofBirth:

7. Qualifications :

8. Whether you belong to Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribe/Ex - Servicemen/Disabled Servicemen/Physically Handicapped Category:

(Ifyes, please attach true copy of the certificate) PLACE

SIGNATURE DATE

GENERAL CONDITIONS :

1. The biodata on plain paper should strictly conform to the above proforma and should only be inthe candidate's own handwriting or typewritten and should be accompanied by a self addressed envelope of 9 " x 4 ".

7452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2. Certified true copy of school certificate as well as proof of date of birth should accompany the biodata.

3. Depending on response , the Corporation reserves the right to allow only a limited number of candidates to sit for Pre -Recruitment Written Test .

produce any evidence to show that the referred school was a recognized school by the Govt . Even during the proceedings , in this petition, he failed to produce any evidence to show that the school , from which he had passed the 9th Standard examination , was a recognized school. The evidence available on record, therefore , proves that theworkman did not possess the required educational qualification , so as to get an appointment as a PEON with the management.

4. The complete biodata in the prescribed form should be sent to Manager (Per and I.R. ) Divisional Office , L.I.C. of India , Jeevan Prakash , Sector 17-B. Chandigarh , so as to reach her on or before 31-8-85. Biodata received after the prescribed date shall outright by be rejected .

5. All vacancies reserved for Ex - Servicemen/ Disabled Ex - Servicemen shall be filled only from amongst persons nominated by Zila Sainik Board/ Rajya Sainik Board/Directorate General Re- settlement . The applications from Ex- servicemen / Disabled Ex - Servicemen candidates not sponsored by the above agencies , will not be considered.

Sd/- Sr. Divisional Manager

Ifwe look at the condition No. 1, it relates to the educational qualification for appointment as Peon. It reads that the candidates must have possessed 9th Standard Examination from Govt. or Govt . recognized school . Candidates who have passed Matriculation examination with less than 50 per cent marks in the aggregate could also be considered. It further reads that for Ex - Servicemen who have put in at least 3 years service in the Armed Forces , the minimum educational qualification shall be a pass in Standard VII.

Theworkman has challenged the termination ofhis services on the grounds that the management had not associated him with the enquiry held against him; therefore, any order passed thereon is bad in law. On record I find a number ofnotices issued by the management such as noticedt. 11-02-86 Ex . M4, notice 11-7-1986 Ex . M5, notice 19-02-87 Ex . M6 , notice dt. 11-03-87 Ex. M8 , Ex . M9 and the reply of the workman Ex. M10 . There is also on record Ex . M16, by which the services of the workman were terminated. All these documents show that the workmanwas repeatedly asked to produce verification to the fact that the school from which he had passed 9th Standard examination was a Govt. recognized school . So itdoes not lie in the mouth of the workman to claim that hewas not associated with the enquiry conducted against him. Moreover the enquiry conducted was not an enquiry about any misconduct in service committed by the workman . The enquiry was conducted so as to confirm him in service, after the expiry of the probation period, which got extended , by conduct of the parties, and such an extension in probation period was authorized by the terms ofthe appointment order under which the workman had joined the services with the management .

It is clear from the conditions appended to the employment notice that before a person could be appointed as PEON he should have a certificate showing having passed 9th Standard examination from a Govt. or Govt. recognized school .

There is also no weight in the submission of the workman that since he was allowed to continue in service after the expiry of initial period of Six Months probation , therefore, he got confirmed in the service. The reply to this is contained in numerous judgement of the Apex Court of the country such as reported in AIR 1972, Supreme Court page 873 & 1991 (2) SLR( 615).

The workman produced a certificate , issued by G. V. Vidalaya . Sector 24 - D. Chandigarh, which has been exhibited as Ex . M3 . He claimed that the said institute was a recognized institute whereas as per the certificate issued by the D.E.O.. Chandigarh, vide his letter No. SA/ 748/misc ./ 11399 . Chd . dt. 13-4-87 , and which was addressed to the Manager. Life Insurance Corporation of India. Jeevan Prakash. Sector 17- B. Chandigarh . G.V. Vidalaya, Sector 24- D. Chandigarh , this school was shown to be not a recognized school . He also provided a copy of list of recognized schools within the jurisdiction of Chandigarh Administration and the name of the G. V. Vidalaya . Sector 24- D. Chandigarh did not figure in the list of these schools, which had been recognized . In response to the notice issuedby the L.I.C .. before the termination of the services of the workman he did not

There is weight in the submission of the management that Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act does not come in the way of the management in the light of the Life Insurance Corporation Act of 1956. They have relied upon the judgement of the Supreme Court reported as AIR 1994 , Supreme Court 1343. Their Lordship in that judgement have laid down that termination effected by the Life Insurance Corporation in terms of the contract of appointment read with Regulation No. 14 framed under the Life Insurance Corporation Act of1956 is not retrenchment within the meaning ofSection 2 (oo) of the Act , since it contains non - obstante clause. They further held that any termination under the Regulation cannot be assailed for compliance of Section 25-F of the Act . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

7453

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

subsequent judgement reported as AIR 1998 , Supreme Court 327, followed this view. Their Lordship held that the letter of appointment stipulating discharge from service without notice or reasons could not be held to be bad on the grounds of failure of Corporation to give opportunity of hearing. The termination also does not amount to retrenchment as defined by Section 2( oo) of the Act .

In the facts and circumstances of the case , I find that the workman was a probationer on the day his services were terminated. There is no justification for him to claim that he got confirmed in the service, after the expiry of initial period of probation. The Punjab and Haryana High Court in the Case of Vimaljeet Singh Vs. State of Punjab, reported in 1994 ( 2SCT386) held that where the probation period is extendable , there is no automatic confirmation. There has to be an order of confirmation by the competent authority, on completion of probation period unless there isspecific provision of automatic confirmation in the Rules or in the appointment order. In the present case the workman has failed to show that there existed rules under the Life Insurance Corporation Act , by virtue of which he automatically got confirmed. As against to it , the appointment order contained stipulation that the initial period of probation could be extended for further Six Months . The Regulation framed under the Life Insurance CorporationAct contained in Regulation 14 that the period ofprobation could be extended by the competent authority upto one year and that during the period of probation the employee shall be liable to be discharged from the service without any notice.

Afterconsidering the facts and circumstances of the case the reference , made by the Govt . , is replied in the terms that the action of the Senior Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India , Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh . Raj Kumar, Peon w.e.f. 29-05-87 was legal and justified and that the workman is not entitled to any relief.

The award is passed in these terms . Let a copy of it be sent to the Appropriate Government for necessary action and the file be consigned to record after due completion.

KULDIP SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2753.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पोस्टल ट्रेनिंग सेन्टर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , बैंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 67/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को6-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -40011 / 16/2000- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004

S.O. 2753. In pursuancenance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Postal Training Centre and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-10-2004.

[No. L-40011 / 16/ 2000 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: 23rd September, 2004

PRESENT :

Shri A. R. Siddiqui, Presiding Officer

C.R. No. 67/2000

IParty

II Party

The Principal,

Postal Training Centre, MYSORE -570010 .

Sh. Palaniswamy, 129, Opp . to Mysore Silk Rajiv Gandhi Colony, Mandavadi Road, MYSORE- 570001 .

APPEARANCES :

: V. S. Naik , Advocate IParty

IIParty

: S. R. Deshpande , Advocate

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1) and Sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L- 40011 / 16/ 2000/ IR( DU) dated 28-09-2000 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the claim of Sh. Palaniswamy, former Safaiwala of Postal Training Centre , Mysore for payment of invalid pension is maintainable ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? " 2. In response to the notice issued by this tribunal to the parties on 20-08-2001 learned counsel Shri V. S. Naik undertook to file vakalat for the I party along with the Claim Statement on which date Shri T. P. Srinivas 7454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8, 1926

filed his memo of appearance for the II party. On 14-11-2002 when the case was taken up for hearing I party though appeared before the court did not choose to file his claim statement and accordingly my learned predecessor wrote the following Order Sheet:

IPartyPresent.

Official is present for Management.

Claim Statement not filed .

Call by 16-12-2002

3. From 14-11-2002 till 06-07-2004 once again the case came to be posted for filing of the claim statement by the I party however this opportunity was also not availed by the I party and once again this tribunal posted the case for filing of the counter statement by writing the order sheet 06-07-2004 as under :

Time Prayed . No grounds . Hence taken as Claim not filed . For Counter Statement if any by 30-07-2004 .

4. The II party management also did not file counter and then case was taken as closed and posted for award .

5. As could be seen from the order sheet maintained by this tribunal in the instant case learned counsel Shri V. S. Naik undertook to file claim and vakalat for the I party but he did not do so as on today. However , the I party himselfbeing present before this tribunal on 10-01- 2002 and once again on 14-11-2002 did not choose to file his claim statement . As could be seen from the points of reference, the burden of proof was cast upon I party and it was for him only to substantiate before this tribunal that his claim for payment of ' Invalid Pension' was maintainable against the management . Keeping in view the conduct of the I party in not filing the claim statement despite pendency of the proceedings before the tribunal for about a period of more than 3 years what appears is that he has lost interest in the matter and is not intending to prosecute the proceedings .

6. Therefore , there is no point in keeping the proceedings any more pending . In the result the court is left with no alternative but to reject the reference for non- prosecution. Hence the following award .

ORDER

Reference is rejected for non -prosecution.

(Dictated to the L. D. C. , transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 23rd September, 2004)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2754. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] संचारविभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण बैंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 88/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-40012/38/99- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004

S.O. 2754. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 88 / 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt . of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 6-10-2004.

[No. L-40012/38/ 99 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE

Dated: 17th September, 2004

PRESENT :

Shri A. R. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer C.R. No. 88/1999

II Party

IParty

Smt. Venkatamma, W/ o late Sri Kalvanaiah, Kadakola,

The General Manager, Department of Telecommunications , Jayalakshmipuram , MYSORE - 570012 Jayapurahobli , Tal & Dist. , MYSORE - 570001 .

APPEARANCES :

O. K. Harish, Advocate

1Party

II Party

: M. C. Ravi Kumar, Advocate

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L - 40012/38 / 99 / IR ( DU ) dated 26-07-1999 for adjudication on the following schedule:

7455

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of. The General Manager, Deptt. of Telecommunications , Mysore in terminating the services of Smt . Venkatamma is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief she is entitled ?"

with a Postal Endorsement that " She is no more" . Thus a notice by Registered was taken against her counsel to be on safer side and that also met with same fate as learned counsel failed to respond to the said notice despite its due service . On 15-09-2004 when the matter was taken up, counsel for the I party remained absent . Learned counsel appearing for the II party submitted that the proceedings stand abated as no LR's of the deceased I party have been brought on record despite the fact that she expired long back and was reported to be dead by Postal Endorsement dated 11-05-2004 . As per the above said endorsement dated 11-05-2004, the I party was reported to be dead and to be on safer side this court had taken a Registeredpost to her counsel so that he could do the needful in the matter. Unfortunately, he remained absent before the court despite the due service. From 11-05-2004 to this date more than 4 months have elapsed . Even if we take the above said date as the date of her death, so far no LR's have been brought on record and none on her behalf has come forward to come on records. As seen above the learned counsel appearing for the party did not turn up to help the court in the matter . In the result the court is left with no alternative but to hold that proceedings on hand stand 'Abated' . Hence , the following award.

ORDER

Proceedings are closed as ' ABATED '

(Dictated to the L.D.C. , transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 17th September, 2004) 2. The I party filed Claim Statement alleging that she was appointed at the Kadakola Telephone Exchange as Sweeper in January 1981 on consolidated wages of . Rs. 50.00 per month . She was discharging her duties very honestly and sincerely so also continuously from January 1981 to 30-06-1989 . She contended that while she was on duty on 30-06-1989 , the officer incharge of the exchange told her that the Divisional Engineer Telecom has directed him to remove her from the service and accordingly her services have been terminated from 01-07-1989 and termination was bad in law there being no compliance of Section 25 (F) of I.D. Act. She approached the General Manager in the month of February 1993 seeking reinstatement but was disappointed. Even she moved the Labour and Conciliation Officer, Mysore District, Mysore resulting into a reference by the Labour Officer of the Karnataka Government and that reference was withdrawn as not pressed. She then raised another dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) at Bangalore on 21-12-1997 and on the failure report made by him the present reference is made to this tribunal by Government of India.

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004 3. Therefore she requested this tribunal to pass an award declaring the action of the management in terminating her services as illegal, with a direction to reinstate her into service with continuity of service and fullbackwages.

का. आ. 2755.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गैरीसन इंजीनियर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 179/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-13012/2/98- आई.आर. (डी. यू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004 4. The Management by its Counter Statement denied the very relationship between the management and the I party contending that as per the records maintained by the Office of the Management and the records of the Telephone Exchange or any of the subordinate offices of the management no person by name Smt. Venkatamma had ever been appointed as Sweeper at the Telephone Exchange, Kadakola as alleged by the I party. Therefore, the management requested the court to dismiss the reference.

S.O. 2755.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 179/ 98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Garrison Engineer and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-10-2004 .

[No. L - 13012 /2/98 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer 5. On the receipt of the reference it was registered on the file of this tribunal and notices were taken against both the parties. Both of them made appearances before this tribunal with respective counsels. After some gap of period due to the retirement of my Learned predecessor whenthe case was taken up on 08-03-2004 both the parties remained absent . They also did not turn up by themselves or through counsels on 01-04-2004 as well as on 06-05-2004 . Therefore, in the interest of justice this court thought proper to issue fresh notice to the I party and the notice issued to her under RPAD returned to this office 7456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh , Presiding Officer

Case No. L. D. No. 179/98

placed on record by the workman on 23-06-04. In view, of the judgments , the management requested for consideration of question of latches . As agreed to by the counsel for the parties , the arguments on the question of latches were heard on 30-08-04 . The Court , at this stage, is required to consider as to whether the present reference is bad for latches and so is not maintainable .

Registered on 21-08-1978

Date of Decision : 23-9-2004

Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Hari Krishan , C/ o Sh . Gopal Arora, H. No. 3075, Sector -38D, Chandigarh - 160001.

4. Before we take up the matter in issue for consideration, a brief statement of facts may be recounted, which have led to the issuance of present reference and its consideration by this court .

Petitioner

Versus

1. The Secretary to Govt . of India , Ministry of Defence, New Delhi .

2. The Chief Engineer, Military Engineer Services , Bhatinda.

3. Garrison Engineer , AGE EN No. 4 (GE) , Bhatinda Cantt. .Respondents

Appearances :

For the Workman : Shri Gurbinder Singh.

For the Management : Shri K. K. Thakur

AWARD

The Government of India Ministry of Labour referred the following matter for the adjudication of this Tribunal vide their Order No. L- 13012 /2 / 98 /IR (DU) , dated 11-08-1998 .

5. It is the case of the workman that he was appointed as Wireman on 27-11-84 and was drawing a monthly salary of Rs . 1200/- + allowances on 03-01-87 when his services were terminated; that till then he had continuously served the respondents; that the services of the workman were terminated without following the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , hereinafter to be referred as Act; that the workman approached the Central Administrative Tribunal , against the termination of his services, but his application was dismissed on the grounds that he has not exhausted the alternative remedy under the Act ; that after the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal , on 06-10-93 , he filed an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which too, was dismissed on 10-1-1997 ; that the workman has been prejudiced since the management did not follow the provisions of Section 25 - F and 25 -G of the Act as neither any notice was served upon him nor he was paid any compensation, before the termination of his services , that the management futher made the lapse , by retaining the juniors of the workman in service while terminating his services.

"Whether the action of the Management of Garrison Engineer, MES Bhatinda Cantt . in terminating the services of Sh . Ashok Kumar, S/ o Sh . Hari Krishan as a daily rated worker w.e.f. 03-01-87 is just and legal ? If not , to what relief to the workman is entitled to, from what date ?"

The reference was entered in the concerned register and notices were issued to the parties . The workman appeared on 11-01-99 and filed the claim statement . The management appeared through their counsel and filedthe written statement on 08-12-99 . The workman filed his affidavit on 22-11-2000 , whereas the management filed affidavit of one of their witness on 25-02-2002 . The workman appeared as witness on 29-04-03 and with that the workman closed his evidence .

3. During the course of the proceedings on 29-08-03 , it was brought to the notice of the Court that the Central Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the case of the workman; and that the appeal against the said order, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also met with the same fate. The court directed the workman to place on record the copies of the judgments passed by the Hon'ble High Court and Supreme Court . The copies were

6. The management has opposed the claim of the workman. They have raised the preliminary objections about the maintainability of the reference stating that the employees, working with the management are governed by the rules , framed under Article 309 of the Indian Constitution , therefore, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the instant case especially in the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case P. K. Vijayan Nair Vs. Assistant Superintendent of Post Office . It is further claimed by them that the colleagues of the workman agitated the matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal and then before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and all of them were given benefits granted to them by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. That the workman cannot claim any benefit as he has come to this Court to claim relief under the Act . Moreover, he has concealed the fact by wrongly claiming that he had worked continuously for the respondents whereas he had worked for the respondents , intermittently, as the work in which he was engaged, was seasonal one . They have further. alleged that since the relief claimed by the workman has 7457

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

been refused, by the forum be approached, therefore, his coming to the present forum is a misuse ofjudicial forum.

has not shown as to on which date he served the demand notice on the Management . However, the copy ofnotice, placed on record, shows that the demand notice was issued somewhere in the year 1997. The reply to the notice , made as Appendix - A, to the affidavit of the workman , filed on 20-11-02 , shows that the same was dated 23-12-97 . The management has claimed that there is an inordinate delay in making the reference, therefore , the same is bad and should be rejected on the ground of latches on the part of the workman.

7. On merits it is their case that the workman was engaged, on daily wages and was paid on Muster Roll , so as to carry out seasonal work . Claiming that they have followed the provisions of the Act , it is stated by them that a notice was not required to be issued under Section 25-F of the Act, in this case ; that since the workman had not continuously worked for a period as required under Section 25 - F of the Act, therefore , he is not entitled to the benefits , under the said section. Moreover, the workman was clearly told that, his services will be deemed to have automaticallyterminated at the time of completion ofwork and he will be entitled to no consequential benefits . They have also contested the claim of the workman that his juniors were retained whereas his services were terminated, thus the violation of under Section 25 -G of the Act . It is also claimed by the management that the workman is working as an employee with M/s . Jag Construction Co. under identity card No. 94199.

8. The workman reiterated the facts , stated in the claim petition , in his affidavit filed on 29-04-2003 . He also filed rejoinder , by which , he again denied the claim of the management , as made out in the written statement. He specifically claimed that he had worked for the management continusouly, that the claim for issuance of notice is correct besides the other claims made in the rejoinder.

11. It is on record that when the petitioner, along with others , approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, by way of SLP, the Hon'ble Court rejected their case on the grounds of inordinate delay in filing the case and for failing to explain the inordinate delay in approaching the Court. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court , the referene should be rejected since the petitioner has failed to explain the inordinate delay he made in approaching the appropriate forum, for the redressal of his grievances . As stated earlier his services wereterminated on 03-01-87 . He did not approach the competent authority under the, Industrial Disputes Act . Instead he approached the Central Administrative Tribunal and kept on prosecuting his case before that forum till 20-09-93 . The petitioner did not awake , even thereafter and approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition , which was decided on 10-01-97 . Thus the petitioner did not approach the right forum in time and took almost 10 years to come to proper forum under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has already held it that the petitioner has made a long delay in approaching the right forum. Hon'ble Apex Court further noticed that the petitioner has not explained the delay to the satisfaction of the court . Hence , his petition is dismissed.

9. As stated earlier the management did not produce any witness , in support of their claim, although they tendered the affidavit of Major Satendra Singh Negi . They also filed Photostat copies of judgments , passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal on 06-10-93 , in the cases ofAshok Kumar Vs. UOI and Gurmeet Singh Vs. UOI and that of Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh, dated 20-09-93 in the OA No. 14/PB/90 which was decided on 20-09-93 , and in which case the present workman was the petitioner, whereas the management herein besides UOI was the answering respondent . The copy ofjudgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in petition's No. 96 CC7075-7077 / 96 decided on 10-01-97 has also been placed on record, which shows that the claim of the petitioner against the judgment of Central Administrative Tribunal , referred to earlier, was not acceptedby the Hon'ble Supreme Court , and SLP filed by him was dismissed.

12. If we look into the pleadings , in the present case, we find that the petitioner has nowhere explained the delay in approaching the competent authority under the Act . He has not claimed that he laboured under the mistaken belief and approached the Central Adıministrative Tribunal and then the Supreme Court, under what circumstances or under the wrong advice of his lawyer. In the absence of any pleadings to this effect the court has no option but to hold that the workman has utterly failed to explain the delay in approaching the competent forum under the Industrial Disputes Act to get redressal to this grievances .

13. It is true, that no limitation is prescribed for filing a petition under the Act but the Apex Court of the country has laid down the law that the delay in making such petition should not be an inordinate and in no case it should be more than 7 years. In the present case the delay is for more than 10 years and that too has not been explained by the petitioner. The Hon'ble Apex Court in 10. It is an admitted case of the petitioner that the management terminated the services of workman on 03-01-87; that after exhausting his remedies , before the Central Administrative Tribunal , he served a demand notice on the management, which has resulted into the making of the present reference to this Court . It is on record that the Central Administrative Tribunal decided the petition of the workman on 06-10-93 . The workman 7458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] the case ofNedungadi Bank Ltd. Vs. K. P. Madhavankutty and Others reported as 2000 - I - LLJ - 247 held as under:-

therefore, his petition was not maintainable under the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985. It is interesting to note that one of the members of the Tribunal was the same, who had assumed the jurisdiction in the earlier case decided on 19-08-92 and relied upon by the counsel for the applicant.

15. The learned counsel for the petitioner has taken the support of another judgment passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal , Principal Bench , New Delhi in the case ofRai Singh Vs. UOI and others . In that case the respondents engineers of Bhatinda Army Camp disengaged 69 labourers who approached the Central Administrative Tribunal , both at Chandigarh and Delhi and all the applications were clubbed together. The Central Administrative Tribunal rejected the applications in limini having been not filed before the appropriate forum. Out of these petitioners some approached the Apex Court, which by an order set aside the order of the Tribunal and direction was issued to consider the case in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Piara Singh reported as 1992 ( 4SCC 116) . As a result the applicants were re- employed. The petitioner Rai Singh , after coming to know about that decision approached the learned Tribunal for relief as was granted to the similarly placed co- workers . Against his claim, the respondents raised the plea of latches , but the Tribunal rejected the same and allowed the petition directing that the benefits extended to the petitioners by the Apex Court be also given to the petitioner.

" Law does not prescribe any time limit for the appropriate Government to exercise its powers under Section 10 of the Act . It is not that this power can be exercised at any point of time and to revive matters , which had since been settled . Power is to be exercised reasonably and in a rational manner. There appears to us to be no rational basis onwhich the Central Government has exercised powers, in this case after lapse of about seven years of order dismissing the respondent from service. At the time reference was made no industrial dispute existed or could be even said to have been apprehended. A dispute, which is state , could not be subject matter ofreference under Section 10 of the Act . As to when a dispute can be said to be state would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case . When the matter has become final, it appears to us to be rather incongruous that the reference to be made under Section 10 of the Act in the circumstances like the present one . In fact it could be said that there was no dispute pending at the time when the reference in question was made . The only ground advanced by the respondent was that two other employees who weredismissed from service were reinstated. Under what circumstances they were dismissed and subsequently reinstated is nowhere mentioned . Demand raised by the respondent for raising industrial dispute was ex facie bad and incompetent" .

16. Without commenting upon the judgment and its applicability to the facts of the present case I say the said judgment is distinguishable since, in that case the petitioner had made a prayer in writing for condonation of delay in approaching the Court . In this case the workman has not stated even a word so as to explain the delay, what to talk of a prayer for condonation of the delay. In the absence of any prayer the question of condonation ofdelay cannot be considered. The present reference thus suffers from the vice of the latches therefore it is rejected. The file be consigned to record after due completion. Let a copy of this award be sent to appropriate Government for necessary action.

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2756. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गैरीसन इंजीनियर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 178/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । 14. The counsel for the workman has relied upon a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh passed on 19-08-92 in the case of Darshan Singh and others , which was decided as a batch of about 70 applications. In that case the petitioners claimed that they were daily rated workers who had put in more than 240 days continuous service for the Garrison Engineer, Bhatinda Cantt; and that their services were terminated verbally between the year 1981-87 ; that the management did not follow the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act . The Hon'ble Tribunal , after examining the matter came to the conclusions that they enjoyed the powers under the Industrial Disputes Act and decided the petitions assuming that they substituted to the jurisdiction of the Hon'ble High Court . With due respects to the Members of the Tribunal'I do not contribute to their views that they enjoyed the powers under the Industrial Disputes Act . In this regard I get the support of the judgment, passed by the same Tribunal in another case on 20-09-93 in which the present workman was the petitioner. The learned Tribunal held that since the petitioner, in the case before them has not exhausted the available remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act ,

[सं. एल-13012/3/98- आई.आर. ( डी. यू) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी 7459 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004

affidavit on 22-11-2000 , whereas the management filed affidavit of one of their witnesses on 25-02-2002 . The workman appeared as witness on 29-04-03 and with that the workman closed his evidence .

S.O. 2756. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 178 / 98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement ofGarrison Engineer and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-10-2004.

[No. L- 13012/3/ 98 -IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

3. During the course of the proceedings on 29-08-03 , it was brought to the notice of the Court that the Central Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the case ofthe workman and that the appeal against the said order, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also met with the same fate . The court directed the workman to place on record the copies ofthe judgments passed by the Hon'bleHigh Court and Supreme Court. The copies were placedon record by the workman on 23-06-04. In view of the judgments , the management requested for consideration of question on latches . As agreed to by the counsel for the parties, the arguments on the question of latches were heard on 30-08-04 . The Court, at this stage, isrequired to consider as to whether the present reference is bad for latches and so is not maintainable .

Shri Kuldip Singh, Presiding Officer.

CaseNo. I. D. No. 178/98 registered on 21-08-1978

Date of Decision : 23-9-2004

4. Before we take up the matter in issue for consideration , a brief statement of facts may be recounted, which have led to the issuance of present reference and its consideration by this court.

Triyogi Pandit S/o Shri Hukam Chand, resident Petitioner ofGuru Teg Bahadur Nagar, Gali No. 12, Biliwala Road,Bhatinda.

Versus

1. The Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi .

2. The Chief Engineer, Military Engineer Services , Bhatinda .

3. Garrison Engineer , AGE EN No. 4 (GE) , Respondents Bhatinda Cantt .

APPEARANCES :

Shri Gurbinder Singh .

Forthe Workman

For the Management : Shri K. K. Thakur

AWARD

5. It is the case of the workman that he was appointed as Wireman on 17-02-83 and was drawing a monthly salary of Rs . 1200/- + allowances on 03-01-87 whenhis services were terminated; that till then he had continuously served the respondents ; that the services of the workman were terminated without following the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter to be referred as Act; that the workman approached the Central Administrative Tribunal , against the termination of his services, but his application was dismissed on the grounds that he had not exhausted the alternative remedy under the Act; that after the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal , on 20-9-93 , he filed an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court , which too, was dismissed; that the workman has been prejudiced since the management did not follow the provisions of Section 25-F and 25 -G of the Act as neither any notice was served upon him nor he was paid any compensation, before the termination ofhis services ; that the management further made the lapse, by retaining the juniors of the workman in service while terminating his services.

The Government of India Ministry of Labour referred the following matter for the adjudication of this Tribunal vide their order No. L- 13012/3 /98 /IR (DU), dated 11-08-1998 .

"Whether the action of the Management of Garrison Engineer, MES Bhatinda Cantt. in terminating the services of Sh . Triyogi Pandit , S/ o Sh . Hukam Chand a daily rated worker w.e.f. 03-01-87 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from what date ?"

3139G1/04-47 7460

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Central Administrative Tribunal , referred to earlier , was not accepted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court , and SLP- filed by him was dismissed.

workman agitated the matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal and then before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and all of them were given benefits granted to them by the Hon'ble Supreme Court . That the workman cannot claim any benefit as he has come to this Court to claim relief, under the Act . Moreover, he has concealed the facts claiming that he had worked continuously for the respondents whereas he had worked for the respondents , intermittently, as the work in which he was engaged, was seasonal one . They have further alleged that since the relief, claimed by the workman has been refused by the forum be approached , therefore , his coming to the present forum is a misuse of iudicial forum.

10. It is an admitted case of the petitioner, that the management terminated the services of workman on 03-01-87; that after exhausting his remedies , before the Central Administrative Tribunal , he served a demand notice on the management, which has resulted into the making of the present reference to this Court. It is on record that the Central Administrative Tribunal decided the petition of the workman on 20-09-93 . The workman has not shown as to on which date he served the demand notice on the Management. However , the copy of notice, placed on record , shows that the demand notice was issued somewhere in the year 1997. The reply to the notice , made asAppendix -A, to the affidavit of the workman, filed on 20-11-02, shows that the same was dated 23-12-97 . The management has claimed that there is an inordinate delay in making the reference , therefore , the same is bad and should be rejected on the ground of latches on the part of the workman.

7. On merits it is their case unat the workman was engaged, on daily wages and was paid on Muster Roll , so as to carry out seasonal work . Claiming that they have followed the provisions of the Act, it is stated by them that a notice was not required to be issued, under Section 25-F of the Act, in this case; that since the workman had not continuously worked for a period , as required under Section 25 -F of the Act , therefore, he is not entitled to the benefits , under the said section. Moreover , the workman was clearly told that , his services will be deemed to have been automatically terminated at the time of completion ofwork and he will be entitled to no consequential benefits . They have also contested the claim of the workman that his juniors were retained whereas his services were terminated , thus the violation of under Section 25 -G of the Act. It is also claimed by the management that the workman is working as an employee with Messers Mokha Electronics under identity card No. 287 .

8. The workman reiterated the facts , stated in the claim petition, in his affidavit filed on 02-11-2002 . He also filed rejoinder , by which, he again denied the claim of the management , as made out in the written statement . He specifically claimed that he had worked for the management continuously, that the claim for issuance of notice is correct, besides the other claims made in para 2, 3 and 4 of the rejoinder .

11. It is on record that when the petitioner , along with others , approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by way ofSLP, the Hon'ble Court rejected their case on the grounds of inordinate delay in filing the case and for failing to explain the inordinate delay in approaching the Court. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the reference should be rejected since the petitioner has failed to explain the inordinate delay he made in approaching the appropriate forum, for the redressal of his grievances . As stated earlier his services were terminated on 03-01-87 . He did not approach the competent authority under the Industrial Disputes Act. Instead he approached the Central Administrative Tribunal and kept on prosecuting his case before that forum till 20-09-93. The petitioner did not awake , even thereafter and approached the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition , which was decided on 10-01-97 . Thus the petitioner did not approach the righ forum in time and took almost 10 years to come to proper forum under the Industrial Disputes Act . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has already held it that the petitioner has made a long delay in approaching the right forum . Hon'ble Apex Court further noticed that the petitioner has not explained the delay to the satisfaction of the court . Hence , hispetition is dismissed .

12. If we look into the pleadings , in the present case we find that the petitioner has nowhere explained the delay in approaching the competent authority under the Act . He has not claimed that he laboured under the mistaken belief and approached the Central Administrative Tribunal and then the Supreme Court, under what circumstances or under the wrong advice of his lawyer. In the absence of any pleadings , to this effect , 7461

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/ कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

the court has no option but to hold that the workman has utterly failed to explain the delay in approaching the competent forum under the Industrial Disputes Act to get redressal to this grievances .

examining the matter came to the conclusions that he enjoyed the powers under the Industrial Disputes Act and decided the petitions assuming that they substituted to the jurisdiction of the Hon'ble High Court. With due respects to the Members of the Tribunal I do not contribute to their views that they enjoyed the powers under the Industrial Disputes Act . In this regard I get the support of the judgment , passed by the same Tribunal in another case on 20-09-93 in which the present workman was the petitioner. The learned Tribunal held that since the petitioner, in the case before them, has not exhausted the available remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act , therefore , his petition was not maintainable under the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985. It is interesting to note that one of the members of the Tribunal was the same , who had assumed the jurisdiction in the earlier case decided on 19-08-92 and relied upon by the counsel for the applicant.

15. The learned counsel for the petitioner has taken the support of another judgment passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principle Bench , New Delhi in the case of Rai Singh Vs. UOl and others . In that case the respondents engineers of Bhatinda Army Camp disengaged 69 labourers who approached the Central Administrative Tribunal , both at Chandigarh and Delhi and all the applications were clubbed together. The Central Administrative Tribunal rejected the applications in limini having been not filed before the appropriate forum. Out of these petitioners some approached the Apex Court, which by an order set aside the order of the Tribunal and direction was issued to consider the case in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Piara Singh reported as 1992 (4SCC 116) . As a result the applicants were re-employed . The petitioner Rai Singh , after coming to know about that decision approached the learned Tribunal for relief as was granted to the similarly placed co - workers . Against his claim, the respondents raised the plea of latches, but the Tribunal rejected the same and allowed the petition directing that the benefits extended to the petitioners by the Apex Court be also given to the petitioner.

"Law does not prescribe any time limit for the appropriate Government to exercise its powers under Section 10 of the Act . It is not that this power can be exercised at any point of time and to revive natters , which had since been settled . Power is to be exercised reasonably and in a rational manner . There appears to us to be no rational basis on which the Central Government has exercised powers , in this case after lapse of about seven years of order dismissing the respondent from service . At the time reference was made no industrial dispute existed or could be even said to have been apprehended. A dispute, which is state , could not be subject matter ofreference under Section 10 of the Act . As to when a dispute can be said to be state would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case . When the matter has become final , it appears to us to be rather incongruous that the reference to be made under Section 10 of the Act in the circumstances likes the present one . In fact it could be said that there was no dispute pending at the time when the reference in question was made . The only ground advanced bythe respondent was that two other employees who were dismissed from service were reinstated. Under what circumstances they were dismissed and subsequently reinstated is nowhere mentioned. Demand raised by the respondent for raising industrial dispute was ex facie bad and incompetent" .

16. Without commenting upon the judgment and its applicability to the facts of the present case I say the said judgment is distinguishable since , in that case the petitioner had made a prayer in writing for condonation of delay in approaching the Court . In this case the workman has not stated even a word so as to explain the delay, what to talk of a prayer for condonation of the delay. In the absence of any prayer the question of condonation ofdelay cannot be considered . The present reference thus suffers from the vice of the latches therefore it is rejected. The file be consigned to record after due completion . Let a copy of this award be sent to appropriate Government for necessary action .

KULDIP SINGH , Presiding Officer 14. The counsel for the workman has relied upon a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh passed on 19-08-92 in the cases of Darshan Singh and others, which was decided as a batch of about 70 applications . In that case the petitioners claimed that they were daily rated workers who had put in more than 240 days continuous service for the Garrission Engineer, Bhatinda Cantt ; and that their services were terminated verbally between the year 1981-87; that the management did not follow the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act . The Hon'ble Tribunal , after 7462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

2.After the receipt of the notification, notices were issued to the parties who appeared and filed their pleadings in the shape of statement of claim, written statement. They have also filed affidavit of workman Raj Kumar and that of Shri S. P. Arya then posted as Supdt. of Post Offices, Kurukshetra .

का. आ. 2757.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सुपरिन्टेन्डैन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट आफिसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/53/94- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi . the 6th October , 2004

S.O. 2757.-1n pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 42/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court . Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Supdt. of Post Offices and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 6-10-2004 .

[No. L-40012/53/94-1R (DU ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA . Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh . Presiding Officer.

Case No. 1. D. No. 42/95 registered on 01-06-1995 Date of Decision : 20-9-2004

3. The claim of the workman is that he was engaged aspart- time Chowkidar in Sub Post-Office, Pehowa and performed his duties in that capacity from 24-12-81 to 31-01-92 and during all that period, he performed his duties to the satisfaction of his superiors , that on the night falling 01-12-91 dacoits intruded in the building, housing the post office armed with weapons . They over powered the workman , caused him injuries and then looted cash from the post office : that the workman in an injured condition informed the concerned quarter about the incident of dacoity, that he was admitted in the hospital where he remained under treatment. During that period, (he Inspector of Post Offices, obtained his signature on a blank paper, saying that a report has to be submitted to the department : that thereafter his services were terminatedby the respondents, without serving him with a charge slicet or show cause notice and without any enquiry, for the alleged misconduct on his part: that the department also did not follow the provisions of Section 25 - Fof the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter is referred to asAct as he was not given a month's notice or salary in licu of the notice period before the termination of his services . He was also not paid the compensation . He further alleged that the respondents retained his juniors in service whereas his services were terminated. They also recruited fresh hands without giving him option for re- employment thus the order of termination of the workman is bad in law and is against the principles of natural justice which is required to be quashed.

Raj Kumar son of Roora Ram Sharma resident of village Sarsa Dhana . District Kaithal ...Applicant

Versus

Superintendent of Post Offices . Kurukshetra Division . Kurukshetra . Respondent.

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman : Shri Dhant Ram

For the Management Shri J. S. Rana .

AWARD

The Government of India . vide its notification No. L-40012/53 /94 - IR( DU ). dated 24/25-05-95 referred the following matter for the adjudication of this Tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the Management of Supdt of Post Offices. Kurukshetra in terminating the services of Shri Raj Kumar. Chowkidar w.e.f. 31-01-1992 is just fair and legal ? If not. to what relief he is entitled to and from what date ?"

4. The management opposed the claim , by raising the preliminary objection that the respondents are not an industry, therefore, the petition is not maintainable . On merits , it is submitted by them that the petitioner was appointed w.c.f. 24-12-85 and not from 24-12-81 , as is claimed by him . Denying the averments made by ltim in para 2 of the claim petition. It is stated by them that the workman, as a Government servant was required to do work and conduct satisfactorily, but in the present case the workman failed in his duty as it was due to his lapse in duty that the miscreants entered the Post Office through the door, which was kept open and the workman was sleeping on the office table, at that time. Thus he derelicted in the performance of his duty and thereby caused a loss ofRs. 36.406.25 . Respondents claim that proper notice was given to the applicant. vide S. P. M. Pehowa letter No. 1287 dated 31-01-92. It is also submitted by them that the statement of the workman was recorded Thereafter, an enquiry was conducied in which the workman was given sufficient opportunity to defend 7463 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

condition. No doubt the report says that the thieves entered the Post Office through the door between the telegraph room and work hall which was kept open and this was the lapse noticed by the Enquiry Officer, on the part of the workman . He also noted down that since the Chowkidar, was sleeping , by infringing the Rules , therefore , he could not perform his duties properly, had he been awake on duty, he would have raised the alarm and the mishap could have been averted. This is all presumptive conclusions .

himself. It is also their case that since the applicant was a part-time worker, therefore , the CCS ( CCA ) Rules were not applicable to him and as he was a contingency paid employee so no regular appointment order was issued nor such employees are brought on the regular establishment . It is also claimed by them that the workman had refused to sign the chargesheet ; that in view of the enquiry conducted by the Director , Postal Services Haryana Circle, Ambala, applicant was held responsible for the incident, therefore, his services were terminated and since the services of the applicant workman were terminated for his lapse in performing his duties , therefore , his termination was not a retrenchment . The workman had made the representation to the Director, Postal Services Haryana Circle, Ambala , which was rejected. Hence, he was not considered for appointment in extra departmental cadre or on part-time post . They have further denied that the respondent has violated the provision of Section 25- F, 25 - G and 25 -H and has prayed for dismissing the claim made by the workman .

7. As noted above the respondent did not hold domestic enquiry nor issued any charge sheet to the workman . They did not serve upon him any charge sheet nor provided him the opportunity to defend himself before the Enquiry Officer . There is nothing to show that any presenting officer was appointed or the workman was allowed to engage a representative to defend himself. The enquiry, alleged to be conducted cannot be said to be a domestic enquiry or which was fair and proper. The termination of service order passed thereon is bad in law. It has been admitted by the respondents that the workman had served them from 24-12-85 till 31-01-92 , without any break in his service . Thus the workman had performed his duties for more than 240 days in the calendar year preceding the date of termination of his services. He was thus entitled to the benefits , as envisaged in Section 25 -F of the Act . The evidence available on record shows that the benefits were not given to the workman . Nowhere the respondents have claimed that they had given notice to the workman before the termination of his services or that they had paid hiin the retrenchment compensation. In the written statement , they claimed that since the workman was a part - time worker, therefore , the CCS (CCA ) Rules were not applicable to him , and that as a part-time Chowkidar , he was a contingent paid employee not entitled to be dealt with under the Rules meant for the regular establishment.

5. On record, I find the photocopy of the enquiry report . It has not been exhibited , but it has been made the main basis for the termination of the services of the workman. The management has also placed on record alleged statement of the workman Ex. MI , theexistence of which is denied by the workman . The management has not produced, in the case , the original record, showing day-to -day proceeding in the alleged enquiry, claimed to be held by the Director, Postal Services Haryana Circle , Ambala. The perusal of the photocopy of enquiry report shows that it was not an enquiry exclusively hold to find out the conduct or misconduct of the workman though this enquiry has been made the basis for the termination of his services . The enquiry report itself speaks that it was an enquiry conducted about the alleged incidence of dacoity and the working of the postal services . There is nothing to show in the enquiry, which has been written, in the first form , as to what was the basis for the Enquiry Officer to write such an enquiry report . No doubt, the enquiry report makes reference about the appointment of the Chowkidar and then the lapses noticed on the part of the Chowkidar without showing that the observations nade by the Enquiry Officer were based on specific evidence , which was tested on the touchstone of the cross- examination and that before making such an observation , the workman had been given the articles comprising the charge sheet, the detail of evidence to be produced against him and the evidence to show that the Chowkidar was given sufficient opportunity to defend himself.

8. The management claimed that the workman had admitted his guilt by making a voluntary statement , but workman, in his affidavit , categorically denied having made such a statement and alleged that the Inspector of PostOffices had obtained his signatures on a blank paper, when he was admitted in CMC , Hospital , Pehowa. He named D. P. Singh as the concerned Inspector. The management did not produce that D. P. Singh as their witness or any other witness to show that the workman had made a voluntary statement and to whom and in whose presence and who recorded the same. The reliance of the respondents on such a statement is misplaced.

9. The Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. UOI and others , being Civil Writ Petition No. 6589 of 1988 , decided on 24-01-89 held that once it isproved that a workman had rendered service for a period of 240 days , his nature of employment , whether on daily 6. If we read the enquiry report it clearly notes down the circumstances in which the alleged dacoity had taken place. It reads that the thieves overpowered the Chowkidar and gave him beating , injured him with iron rods and thereafter looted the cash , after opening the iron safe and left , keeping the Chowkidar in an injured and unconscious 7464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 6th October, 2004

wages or on work charge are totally irrelevant consideration. Thus the claim of the management that the workman was a part - timer, therefore , he did not enjoy the protection as was allowed to a regular employee , is totally irrelevant. Whether or not the Post Office is an industry, is answered with the help ofdecision of Supreme Court passed in Bangalore Water Supply Case, reported as ( 1978 ) I LLJ 376. The activities of Post Offices clearly fall them in the definition of Industry.

S.O. 2758. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 93/91 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 6-10-2004 .

[No. L -40012/162/ 90 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh , Presiding Officer

Case No. I.D. 93/91 Received on 24-7-1991 . Registered on 25-7-1991

Date of Decision : 22-9-2004

10. After going through the evidence available on record , I am of the considered opinion that the management did not observe the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , specifically Section 25 - F of the Act, before terminating the services of the workman . The management did not issue any notice to him , before terminating his service , they also did not pay him the retrenchment compensation and also failed in their duty to inform the appropriate Government , by a notice , in the prescribed manner about the proposed termination of services of the workman . The termination of services of the workman is , therefore, held to be bad in law and is quashed . The reference made by the Government of India is answered in the following terms :-

Narata Ram S/ o Karam Chand , Vill . Gadiwal , Thana Gadiwal, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib , Distt. Ropar .

Workman

Versus

The Executive Engineer, Building Construction and Township Division , BBMB , Nangal Township & others . Respondent .

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman : Shri O. P. Batra .

For the Management Shri R. C. Attri .

AWARD

The following reference was made by the Govt. of India vide their No. L- 42012/ 162/90 - IR( DU) dt . 12-7-91 and the same was sent to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"The action of the management of Supdt . of Post Offices , Kurukshetra Division , Kurukshetra in terminating the services of Sh . Raj Kumar , Chowkidar w.e.f. 31-01-92 was unjust, unfair and illegal . He is , therefore , entitled to the relief of reinstatement on the post from which he was retrenched , treating retrenchment as bad with continuity of service , as if there was no order of his retrenchment . As regards the benefits ofback wages, the management has neither claimed nor proved that the workman was gainfully engaged during the period of his retrenchment . However, it is a facet that during this period he did not perform duties of the Post Office . Thus I hold that he is entitled to backwages to the extent of 50 per cent . The reference is answered and the award is passed . Let a copy of it be sent to Government of India for necessary action and the file be consigned to record after due completion" .

KULDIP SINGH , Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर, 2004

"Whether the action of the Management of Bhakra Beas Management Board , Nangal Township , in terminating the services of Sh . Narata Ram, Ex- Beldar, w.e.f. 1-2-90 is justified ? If not what relief he is entitled to and from what date ?"

का. आ. 2758. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी. बी. एम. वी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 162/90- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

2. The reference was received by this Tribunal on 24-7-1991 and the same was entered in the concerned register and notices were issued to the parties , who appeared through their representatives on 27-11-91. The workman filed the claim petition on the same day whereas the management filed written statement on 25-8-99 . In this between application was made under Section 36 of Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter to be referred as ' Act ' 7465 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8, 1926

they retained the juniors of the workman in service whereas his services were terminated and also recruited fresh hands without offering him the job.

for debarring the petitioner from appearing through a legal counsel . The court after due consideration of the objections of the petitioner held that the application is not maintainable having been filed at a belated stage .

3. The workman filed replication and both the parties filed the affidavits and documents, in support of their respective cases. Workman appeared as a witness whereas Sh . R. B. Singh appeared as a witness for the management.

4. It is on record that the management made another application on 7-4-91 requesting the Court to debar Sh. O. P. Batra , who appeared on behalf of workman since he is a practising lawyer . The workman filed objection thereto. The representative of the workman also filed his affidavit claiming that he is appearing , in the case , in his capacity as legal secretary of Hind Mazdoor Sabha . The court, after the consideration of the application , the objections and affidavit allowed, Mr. Batra to appear on behalf of the workman and thus the application of the management was deemed to have been rejected.

7. The management filed written statement , by which they opposed the claim of the workman by raising preliminary objections and the grounds taken on merit. It is their claim that the reference is bad in law since the Appropriate Govt . did not ask for the objections of the management , before referring the matter for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference in the circumstances is bad in law. That the reference is also bad since there existed no dispute nor the same was apprehended . The reference is also bad for latches . It is claimed by the management that the seniority of the casual labourers is being fixed on the basis of policy framed in compliance to the directions of Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, issued in the case of Ram Piari & others Vs. BBMB passed in the CWP No. 27/88 and upheld in CWP No. 274/90, by the same High Court in the case of Krishnu Ram & others Vs. BBMB . The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India also upheld the policy so framed in the case of Civil Appeal No. 5635/90 decided on 2-11-90. The Hon'ble Supreme Court upheld the decision of the H. P. High Court . According to them the deployment and retrenchnient of the workers are being done and on the start of new works on need for fresh labour basis . For that reason also the petition is not maintainable .

5. On 30-4-03 the workman made an application for permission to produce additional evidence to which the management filed objections . After the consideration ofthe application and the objections filed thereto, the court rejected the same and the matter was directed to be listed for final argument, which the parties addressed on 2-6-04.

8. Rebutting the averments in the claim petition , it is stated by the management that the workman was appointed as unskilled Mazdoor in Building Construction and Township Division , Nangal , for watch and ward of the quarters , where he worked for 101 days as per the detail given in the written statement . Since the work for which the workman was engaged was nearly completion , the workman left the job at his own . Thereafter he never approached the management for work . They further denied that any junior of the workman was engaged, after he left thejob. According to the management the workman served in the Nangal Dam Division from July 89 to Nov. 89 , as a special watch and ward, for Nangal Hydel Channel , that in terms of the policy framed on 8-7-88 , the workman could not claim seniority on the basis of services he rendered in the Building Construction and Township Division . According to the management the workman worked from Dec. 89 to Jan. 90. He was deployed to work against other special works of testing and sand grouting, behind lining of NHC .

9. The management further stated that the workman had worked in the Nangal Dam Division for 152 days and he stood at serial No. 44 of the seniority list ; that in Jan. 1990 , seventy eight workmen were deployed but in Feb. 1990 only 12 unskilled Mazdoors were retained as perthe field requirement. As per the seniority list, a notice to that effect was also placed on the notice board, nojunior 6. The claim of the workman is that he had served the management as Beldar from 12-2-89 to 1-2-90, on wages at the rate of 18/54 and thus he served the management for more than 300 days in the calendar year; that the management terminated the services of the workman on 1-2-90 without giving him any notice , charge sheet , enquiry and he was also not paid the compensation. Thus the management violated the provision of the Act ; that the management obtained the thumb impression of the workman in the name of Ashok Kumar in May 1989 with mala fide intention to reduce the working period of the workman; that the services rendered to the management in the name of Ashok Kumar were in fact the services done by the workman and the management committed the unfair labour practise by getting services ofthe workman on a changed name ; that the management. asked the workman to join duties as a fresh worker, which the workman did not accept , since, it would have resulted into break in his service . Despite his request the nanagement did not agree to give him the benefit of continuity in service nor they paid the back - wages to him .The intention of the management was to terminate the services of the workman soon after his joining as a fresh workman and he would have lost the length of service , he rendered ; that the management violated the provision of Section 25 - F, 25 -G and 25 - H of the Act as 7466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

was terminated, with continuity of service and full back- wages.

of the workman was retained in service in Feb. 1990 and thereafter . Admitting that the workman had also served for 101 days in Building Construction and Township Division, Nangal , they claimed that the seniority of the workman was as per the directions of the Himachal Pradesh , High Court . Therefore, the disengagement of workman from the services of Nangal Dam Divn . did not involve any violation of the provisions of the Act and the principles of natural justice . They undertook to state factual position , about the claim of workman that his thumb impression was taken against the name of Ashok Kumar, the moment the workman provided the name of the Divn./sub divn . in which it was done .

12. The workman filed his affidavit in support of the claim petition Ex. W1 and also faced the cross- examination of the management . He reiterated the facts stated in the claim petition, in his affidavit . In cross- examination he admitted that he had worked in the Nangal Dam Div. from 10-2-89 to 1-2-90 . He then corrected himself and stated that during that period he had worked in two different divisions , that is from 10-1-89 to June 89 inBuilding Construction and Township Divn . Nangal and he was employed in Nangal Dam Divn . , in July 1989 ; and that both the divisions were manned by two different Executive Engineers . He further admitted that he had worked for 152 days in the Nangal Dam Divn, where from his services were terminated and his duties were at different places when he worked in two different divisions . He admitted that the work of the Bldg. , which was put under his watch and ward, got completed in the June 89 and then he was deputed by the SDO , to work in Nangal Dam Divn.; that his thumb impression was obtained, against the name of Ashok Kumar, in Township Divn. , by one Gurmeet Singh , Overseer ; that he had demanded continuity in service , but the management refused , therefore, he had refused the offer to work . He further admitted that the management had given him offer of service with continuity in service , but without backwages , therefore, he had not accepted the offer.

10. Claiming that during the month of July, 90 the workload in Nangal Dam Divn . increased , due to monsoon andto meet the field requirement , unskilled casual workers were summoned as per the seniority list of the Division, including the workman , but he refused to report for duty on one or the other excuse which clearly suggested that he was not interested to join the duties. Describing the contents of para 11 as misconceived, it is stated by the management that during the conciliation proceedings the management had offered to engage the workman and to give him the seniority, but he remained adamant and it is clear from the report of the ALC , as he has noted that the management is ready to engage Sh . Narata Ram and to give hiın seniority, but he is not prepared and is mis-guided by his representatives , thus the conciliation proceedings have failed . The workman , therefore , has unnecessarily dragged the respondent into litigation so as to get undue and illegal benefit . They have prayed for disınissal of the petition being without any merit , in view of the factual position, placed on record .

13. Sh . R. B. Singh , SDEO , Nangal Dam Divn. , appeared as a witness for the management and admitted the contents of his affidavit Ex . M2 as correct, besides thatofthedocuments placed on record by the management and exhibited as Ex. M2 to M6 . In cross -examination he admitted that the workman had performed his duties from Feb. 89 to June 89 , in the Bldg . Const . Township Divn . and thereafter he had joined duty in the Nangal Dam Divn . in July 89 , where he worked upto the end of Jan. 90. He admitted that the workman had completed his service of 240 days in the year preceding the date of his termination , as lie had performed the duty for 101 days in the Bldg. Const . Divn . and for 152 days in the Nangal Dam Divn . He , however, claimed that both the divisions were controlled by separate Executive Engineers . He admitted that Ex . W9 , W11 , W17 and W18 were issued by his department and the department had received document W3 , W10 and W12 : and that no letters was written to the workman after 12-9-90 . He denied the suggestion that the juniors of the workman were retained whereas the workman was terminated from service . He admitted that Sanjeev Kumar and Krishan Kumar were appointed in the year 1990 but after the workman refused to join back the department .

11. The workman filed rejoinder wherein he claimed thatthe reference has rightly been made since there existed Industrial Dispute; and that he had performed duty for 300 days in the calendar year preceding the date of his retrenchment and the management violated the provisions of Section 25 - F, G & H as they did not follow those provisions , retained the juniors in service and did not offer employment to him . Reiterating the facts stated in the claim petition, he stated that the work, against which he was appointed , was in progress when his services were terminated and against that work the management made new appointments . He offered to accept the job , without back -wages provided the continuity of his service is given to him . Explaining the circumstances in which he refused to accept the offer , made by the management , before the conciliation officer , he stated that the conciliation officer had pressurised him to join the service as a fresher , which he did not accept and he had challenged the order of the conciliation officer whereupon the High Court referred the matter to this Tribunal . The workman refirmed the averments made by him in his claim petition and requested that he may be reinstated on the job , from which he

14. Here we have to recall the reference , made by the Appropriate Govt . , for the adjudication of this 7467 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

Tribunal . The Govt . of India desired to know whether the action of the management of BBMB , Nangal Township interminating the services of Sh. Narata Ram , Ex-Beldar w.e.f. 1-2-90 , is justified and if not , to what relief the said beldar is entitled to and from which date . The workman has challenged the termination of his services on the grounds:

produced any evidence to show that they had complied with the provisions of Section 25 - F of Act . Before the termination of services of the workman , the provisions required of Management even the sending of notice/ information to the Appropriate Government , about the termination of a workman , who had been in continuous service of 240 days . There is , therefore , clear violation of provisions of Section 25 -F of the Act by the management .

I. That the management did not follow the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , before terminating his services . It is also his claim that he had served the management from 10-2-89 to 1-2-90 and thereby he had put in 300 days continuous service , for the management, preceding the date of termination of his services . Elaborating further he stated that , before the termination of his services, no notice was given to him , no enqiury was held nor he was served with any charge sheet and was also not paid the retrenchment compensation.

16. The managenient has , however, contended that since the workman had not performed duties continuously in one division and in terms of the policy framed by instructions, issued by the management of BBMB vide its No. 30315-450/PD/468/87/ A- 7 dt . 8-7-88 , on the directions of High Court of Himachal Pradesh passed, in CWP No. 27/88 in the case of Smt . Ram Piari & Others Vs. BBMB the seniority of the workman could be considered only in one division and his services in the two divisions could not be clubbed together so as to find out whether he had performed continuous service of 240 days, before the termination of his services . They further contended that the policy to frame the seniority list was upheld by the same High Court in the subsequent judgement passed in CWP No. 274/90 , titled as Krishau Ram & others Vs. BBMB and the same was also not disturbed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court , by their judgement passed in Civil Appeal No. 5635/90 . dt . 22-11-90. Thus the policy adopted and instructions issued by the BBMB, were held to be valid. Thus the seniority was to be maintained at the divisional level .

II . That the management further violated the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act by obtaining his thumb impression against the name of Ashok Kumar , in July 1989 , and thereby committed unfair labour practice , so as to reduce the length of service of the workman. In order to do that, they further asked the workman to join duties as a fresh labour vide their letters and did not accede to his request of giving him continuity of service . They behaved in the similar fashion during the conciliation proceeding and refused to give the benefit of continuity of service to the workman.

III . The management also violated the provisions ofSection 25 -G & H, as they retained the juniors in service whereas terminated the services of the workman and also did not offer the appointment to the workman before recruiting fresh hands .

17. This argument of the management is apparently after thought and cannot hold good. Nowhere , in their pleadings they have claimed that the workman did not complete 24() days of his service , as such he cannot claim the benefit of provisions of Section 25 -F of the Act. In fact their witness , Sh . R. B. Singh , in his statement , before this court , categorically admitted that the workınan had completed 240 days of service in the year preceding the date of his termination . In their written statement also they claimed that during the conciliation proceedings , on 11-9-90 , the management had offeredto engage Sh. Narata Ram and to give him seniority accordingly . but that was not accepted by him . This shows that the management was clear in their mind that the workman had put in the required service of 240 days , at the time of his retrenchment , still they did not follow the mandate of law, as they did not issue notice to the workman nor paid him salary in licu of the notice period . They also did not pay retrenchment compensation to the workman . There is also no evidence to show that a notice was given to the Appropriate Govt . or the authority authorised by it , about the proposed termination of services of the workman . They thus , violated the provisions of Section 25 -F of the Act .

15. The only witness examined , by the management , in his statement , recorded on 16-4-02 , Sh . R. B. Singh , admitted that the workman had joined service with the management in Feb. 89 in the Building Construction Township Divn. and had performed duties in thatDivision upto June 89. Thereafter, he joined Nangal Divn. in July 89 and performed duties upto Jan 1990. He admitted that the workman had performed dutics for 240 days in the calendar year preceding the date of his retrenchment . However , he stated that in the Bldg . Const . Division he had performed duties for 101 days and in the Nangal Dam Divn . for 152 days . Thus it is clear that the workman had performed duties for the management for 240 days in the calendar year preceding the date of termination of his services . He was , therefore , entitled to the benefits as contained in Section 25 - F of the 1. D. Act . The workman has claimed that he was not given any notice before the termination of his services . He was also not paid the retrenchment compensation . The management has neither rebutted this claim of the workman nor has

18. The claim of the management also fades away in the light of the evidence available on record . The 3139 GI/04-48 7468

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004 /KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART H- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

of BBMB , Nangal Township violated the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act while terminating the services of the workman and their action in terminating the services of Sh. Narata Ram, Ex . -Beldar w.e.f. 1-2-90 was not justified.

21. Coming to the second part of the reference , 1 hold that there has come to evidence on record to show that right from the date of termination of his services , the workman remained gainfully engaged in some persued. This fact was to be proved by the management , so as to get an escape from the payment of back -wages . Since the management has failed to prove the engagement of the workman during the period, after the termination of his services, therefore, they are liable to pay back- wages to him . It cannot be accepted that the workman remained without work through out this period , though he may not have been engaged fully and that was what for, the action of the management, therefore , I hold that the workman shall be entitled to the wages to the extent of 50 per cent . In view of the conclusions arrived at the workman is treated to be in service right from the date of his services were terminated, with continuity in service . He is also entitled to the back - wages to the extent of 50 per cent in the circumstances of the case . The management is directed to comply with the award within a month from the date the same is published in the Government Gazette . The file be consigned to record after due completion, and a copy ofthis award be sent to the Appropriate Government .

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

workman in his statement , recorded on 27-9-95, claimed that when his duty in the Building Construction and Township Division, ended in June 89 he was transferred to Nangal Dam Division, by the SDO concerned. He further , claimed that the management , through their Overseer Gurmeet Singh , obtained his thumb impression against the name of Ashok Kumar, so as to deprive him of the benefit of continuity in service , whereas it is he , who had worked , though he was shown to have worked as Ashok Kumar. The management produced their witnesses , after the statement of the workman , but they neither denied the assertions , made by the workman, nor produced any evidence to rebut the claim so made . They also did not bother to produce the SDO , who , as per the claim of the workman had deputed the workman to work in the Nangal Dam Divn . in July 89 or the Overseer , according to the workman , who had obtained his thumb impression , against the name of Ashok Kumar. Taking into consideration these facts , it is clear that the management did not dispute the claim of workman about the continuity of his services and now it does not in their mouth to claim that the workman had not performed the duties continuously in one division for 240 days , therefore, the continuity of his service cannot be accepted and thus his claim for benefit under Section 25 - F of the Act is not maintainable . The workman , as per the evidence on record, continuously clainted in all the proceedings under theAct, before this court and before the conciliation officer , the continuity of service and that is the explanation he gave for having refused to accept the offer, made by the management for re - employinent . For these reasons claim of the management that, in view of the policy framed to maintain the seniority of the workman on 8-7-88 , the petitioner did not perform duties for 240 days , merits no consideration and is rejected.

का. आ. 2759. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सदर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. नं. 419/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-10- 2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41011 /15 /95- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th October , 2004

19. The petitioner had also claimed the violation of Section 25 - G and H , but he has not produced sufficient evidence to prove this claims . There is not doubt that a witness for the management admitted that Sanjeev Kumar and Krishan Kumar were appointed in the year 1990 , but for the reasons that the workman had not responded to the offer of the management for re - employment . Against this, the workman has failed to show anything , rather he admitted that the offer was made to him, but he spurned the same for the reasons that the management did not give him the benefit of continuity in service . However, he contested the claim , made by the management , that in the conciliation proceedings , the management had offered re - employment to the workman with continuity of service but the workman had refused and demanded full back- wages . In the circumstances , 1 hold that the workman has not been able to prove the violation of Section 25 - G & H ofthe Act .

S.O. 2759. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID . No. 419/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 06-10-2004.

20. In view of what has been stated above, the reference is answered in the terms that the management

[No. L - 41011 / 15 / 95 - IR(B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

7469 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

AND

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Monday, the 9th August, 2004

PRESENT :

"Whether the Management Southern Railway, Madras is justified in unilaterally terminating the services of S/ Shri D. Palani and 315 workmen without complying with the provisions of I.D. Act , 1947 and also in violation of the Directives of Supreme Court in the above reference is just, proper and legal ? If not, to what relief are these workmen entitled ?"

K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 419/2001

(Tamil Nadu State Industrial Tribunal I.D. No. 9/97)

3. The allegations in the Claim Statement filed by the representative on behalf of the 316 piece rate labourers are briefly as follows :

[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) between the Management of Southern Railway, Madras and their workmen]

BETWEEN

Sri D. Palani ,

... I Party/Petitioners

Representative of 315 retrenched piece rate labourers

AND

The Chief Personnel Officer ,

Southern Railway, Chennai

... II Party/Management

APPEARANCE :

For the Workmen : Mr. R. Lawrance , Advocates

For the Management : Mr. G. Kalyanasundaram, Advocate.

AWARD

The Petitioner was duly authorised by the 315 piece rate labourers of T.P. Shed at Arakkonam , who served in Southern Railway, Arakkonam Joint Junction for more than 7 to 14 years without any break in service to contest the case . The list of workers and the period of service rendered each in the office of the Respondent is furnished separately and enclosed in the petition . These workers were thrown out of employment suddenly without any prior notice or any retrenchment compensation. These workers were engaged for day -to-day work for conversion ofMeter Gauge to Broad Gauge as mentioned in their representation to the Ministry of State for Labour, Government of India. Some of the piece rate labourers similarly placed in the same situation were brought as regular employees and they were also confirmed in their status . The Respondent is not entitled to pick and choose few daily rated labourers and give them permanent status and keep the rest without any work and to be thrown out of employment and such action of the Respondent is discriminatory in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India . The Supreme Court in W.P. No. 171/86 decided the issue relating to the temporary employees, who served in transhipment shed at Trichy. The findings given by the Supreme Court in the above Writ Petition is equally applicable to the Petitioner's case . The findings ofthe Supreme Court has to be implemented under Article 141 of Constitution of India . Hence , the Petitioner prays an Award may be passed for suitable compensation and employment to the retrenchment piece rated labourers including compassionate appointmentsto the concerned those who are eligible with regard to age and experience with consequential relief.

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification Order No. L - 41011 / 15 /95 - IR (B - 1 ) dated 07-07-1997 has referred this industrial dispute to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal , Chennai , where the dispute was taken on file as I.D. No. 9/97 and notices were issued to both parties and both sides entered appearance through their advocates and filed their respective claim statement and counter statement . Subsequently, on constitution of this CGIT - Cum- Labour Court , the said dispute was transferred to this Tribunal for adjudication and the said dispute was renumbered as I.D. No. 419/2001 . The schedule mentioned dispute is as under :

"Whether the General Manager, Southern Railway, Madras is justified in refusing to consider S/ Sri D. Palani & other 315 T.P. Shed ex -employees of Arakkonam in regularising their services in the light of the regularisation of T.P. Shed workmen of Trichirappalli based on the judgement of the Supreme Court in Writ Petition 171 of 1986 ? "

4. As against this , the Respondent in their Counter Statement alleged that the Petitioners have merely enclosed a list of names without furnishing any proof for they having worked as transhipment shed porters at Arakkonam for the number of years of service rendered asaverred by them. In the case of piece rated workers , the railway administration does not exercise any control over the working hours , attendance or output etc. The piece rated workers are free to work according to their convenience and the payment is made purely on the basis of quantum of goods handled by each individual . The 7470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 30, 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II-SBC . 3 ( ii ) ] Petitioners are not attracted by the provisions of I.D. Act relating to retrenchment . Further , no persons placed similarly as the Petitioners were absorbed as regular employees and no provision of Constitution of India has been violated . Therefore , the Petitioners are not entitled to any benefits , since they are not railway employees and they were not retrenched and are thereby not attracted by the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The judgement of the Supreme Court in W.P. No. 171/86 is a judgement in personam . Further, the Petitioners were not on the rolls of railways . Hence , the question of terminating their service does not arise . Hence , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5. In the additional Counter Statement filed by the Respondent , it is alleged that the claim of the Petitioner is stale , belated and time barred. Since the T.P. Shed, Arakkonam has been closed in the year1980 , and the Petitioner has raised this dispute before Assistant labour Commissioner (Central ) only in the month of April , 1994 and therefore , the reference made by the Ministry of Labour is bad in law. Even though, law does not prescribe any time limit for appropriate Govt. to exercise its power under Section of 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, it cannot be said that this power can be exercised at any point of time. The Central Govt . in this case has exercised the power after a lapse of 15 years . Therefore, the dispute which is stale could not be subject matter of reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Petitioners were working as piece rate labourers in the transhipment shed at Arakkonam who were engaged by the Station Master . The T.P. shed was closed during the year 1980. At the time of closure of T.P. Shed, 219 piece rated labourers were working and not 315 as statedby the Petitioner . The Petitioner for alternative employment to the said 219 labourers was discussed with organised labour representative of the piece rated labourers and a settlement was arrived at for absorption of the workers under the following conditions :

( i) those who have put in five years of continuous service as piece rate workers except those who have been absent for more than 180 days continuously will be considered for regular employment;

( ii ) those who are of 45 years and below may be considered for regular employment . Their absorption is subject to their being declared medically fit under B - 1 and C - 1 category.

Therefore , out of 219 piece rated labourers , 62 of them who had satisfied the above conditions were absorbed on the basis of decision taken by General Manager and the Chief Commercial Superintendent. Therefore , the Petitioners were not qualified for absorption as per the

conditions and not selected . The allegation that Petitioners were continuously working for 7 to 15 years is totally false . Further, none of the Petitioner had worked for 240 days continuously during the alleged period of employment . Even ifthey have worked for 240 days continuously, they are not entitled for any claim, since they are not railway employees . The piece rate labourers are not regular railway employees . The piece rate labourers can come to work at any time as and when they like , as their work not being supervised by railway administration . The piece rate labourers were paid based on the quantum of work they do and no attendance register or muster roll was maintained by railways for them . If they were engaged by railways in sanctioned posts , they have been issued with casual labour card or appointment order . In this case , there is no relationship of master and servant between the Petitioners and Respondent. Therefore , the Petitioner cannot invoke provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . In thiscase , the Petitioners do not have status of even Casual Labour who are subject to certain terms and conditions of recruitment . Further the settlement for absorption ofpiece rate workers was arrived with the representatives of T.P. Shed workers . As per the said settlement, 62 piece rate workers were eligible for appointment in railways and others who had not fulfilled the above conditions were not selected. The Petitioner has not challenged the above appointment of 62 persons before any forum . Therefore , raising of this issue is a belated claim and not maintainable . Further, similarly placed piece rate labourers filed an application before Central Administrative Tribunal and the said applications was dismissed on 14-12-88 . The duty passes are issued to some of the Petitioners who are working under contractor to do work outside the Arakkonam occasionally in the years 1983-84. Since the T.P. Shed has been closed in the year 1980 , the passes issued in the year 1983 and 1984 have no relevancy. Further, the railway protection force has issued the identity cards only for the purpose of making entry into railway premises and these identity cards were not issued on the ground that they were railway employees. Further, the railway management does not issue any identity card for piece rate labourers and it was issued only for security purposes . Since they crossed their maximum age for appointment in railways and further the Petitioners are also not entitled for back wages and compensation as they were gainfully engaged elsewhere. As per the Supreme Court judgement, those who were in active engagement are entitled to regular appointment. The case of the Petitioner is on different footing, when compared with that of transhipment workers at Trichy. Therefore , they cannot claim any benefits based on the Supreme Court judgement . Hence, for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

7471

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30 , 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

6. In these circumstances , the point for my determination is :

(i) " Whether the Respondent is justified in refusing to consider the Petitioners in regularising their services in the light of Supreme Court judgement in W.P. No. 171 / 86?"

(ii) "Whether the Respondent is justified in unilaterally terminating the services of the Petitioner without complying with the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?"

(iii ) " To what relief the Petitioners are entitled ? "

Point Nos . 1 & 2 :

of the hospital permit issued to one Mr. A. Durai and Ex. W7 is the copy of service certificate issued to one Mr. D. Gopal namely WW2. As against this , the Respondent/ Management marked ten documents and Ex.M1 is the copyof letter from Mr. John, General Secretary, Loading andUnloading Mazdoor Union . Ex.M2 is the copy of letter issued by Senior Divisional Personnel Office with regard to absorption of piece rated labourers at T.P. Shed, Arakkonam . Ex.M3 is the copy of office order issued by Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel ) with regard to appointment of 38 piece rated employees as MF Porters . Ex. M4 is the office order of Assistant Personnel Officer with regard to appointment order to two T.P. Shed porters from piece rate labourers . Ex.M5 is the copy of the office order of Assistant Personnel Officer with regard to absorption of 15 piece rate labourers as MF Porters . Ex.M6 is the copy of the letter of Senior Divisional Personnel Officer with regard to engagement of nine piece rate labourers as casual labourers . Ex.M7 is the copy of the letter issued by Chief Personnel Officer. Ex. M8 is the copyof the letter ofDivisional Railway Manager to Labour Enforcement Officer . Ex.M9 and M10 are copy of orders of Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. Nos . 835 to 845/1992 and O.A. No. 346/92 respectively.

7. In this case, Petitioners who are 316 piece rate labourers of Southern Railway, T.P. Shed at Arakkonam alleged that they have been engaged in T.P. Shed at Arakkonam and the railways have stopped them from service in the year 1980 and these piece rate labourers were working in railways from seven to fifteen years and they were thrown out of employment suddenly without any prior notice and no retrenchment compensation was paid to them . As against this , the respondent contended that over the piece rated workers , railway administration have no control and railway administration does not exercise any control over the working hours, attendance or output etc. and they are free to work according to their convenience and the payınent is made purely of the basis of quantum of goods handled by each individuals and they are not attracted the provisons of Industrial Disputes Act , relating to retrenchment . Therefore , the burden ofproving that the Petitioners who are piece rated labourers are workers of railway administration and they are entitled to the benefits of Industrial Disputes Act , is upon the Petitioners .

9. Though the Petitioners alleged that they were working continuously in the Respondent/Management nearly from 7 to 15 years and the Respondent has without any reason or rhyme has stopped the workmen from engaging them as piece rate labourers , and the procedure prescribed under Industrial Disputes Act , was not followed by the Respondent/Management, they have not produced even a single document to show that they worked continuously in the railway department as alleged by them. Further, it is the contention of the Respondent that the Petitioners were engaged as piece rate labourers on contract basis and the railway department has no control overtheir working hours , attendance or output and piece rate workers are free to work according to their convenience and their payment was made purely on the basis of quantum of goods handled by each individual . Therefore it is the bounden duty of the Petitioner to prove that they were paid by railway administration and they were employed by the Respondent/Management . Though the Petitioners have produced Ex. W5 photo Identity Cards and also Ex . W3 series emergent duty passes , Ex. W3 series were issued by Railway Protection Force in the year 1984 and Ex . W4 photo identity cards were also issued by Railway Protection Force and they will not prove that the Petitioners were engaged by railway department because , it is an admitted fact that T.P. Shed at Arakkonam was closed even in the year 1980 and therefore , identity card alleged to have been issued in the year 1984 will not in any way prove that the Petitioners were appointed by railway departinent even in the year 1975-76 onwards . Further, they will not in any way prove that the Petitioners 8. On the side of the Petitioner one Mr. Jayaseelan was examined as WW1 and Sri D. Gopal was examined asWW2 and on the side of the Petitioners seven documents were marked and on the side of the Respondent one Mr. Prithviraj , Senior Clerk in Personnel Department of the Respondent/Management was examined as MWI and on the side of the Respondent Ex.Ml to M10 were marked. Out of this , Ex . W1 is the copy of the letter addressed to Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central) by Mr. D. Palani . Ex . W2 series are copy of emergent duty passes issued by the Respondent/ Management to some of the Petitioners . Ex. W3 is the copy of the office orders issued by the Divisional Railway Manager with regard to appointment of 30 persons . Ex . W4 is the representation given by the representatives of the Petitioner to the Chief Labour Commissioner . Ex. W5 (series ) is the Identity Cards for the piece rated labourers issued by Railway Protection Force , Arakkonam . Ex . W6 is the zerox copy 7472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] were continuously worked in railway management for 7 to 15 years prior to 1980. Further Ex. W4 which is a photo identity card issued by Railway Protection Force only as a security measure because they were permitted to enter into the railway premises . As such , these documents will not in any way prove the contention of the Petitioners that they were in continuous employment in the railway department for 7 to 15 years prior to 1980 .

13. But, again the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that neither the Respondent nor MWI has produced the alleged settlement entered into by representative of piece rate labourers with the railway management before this Tribunal . Under such circumstances, it cannot be said that there was screening before the selection of 62 piece rate labourers out of 219 piece rate labourers . Though , I find some force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, from the documents Ex.M2 to M6, I find there is no point in the contention of the Petitioner because , it cannot be said that even after twenty years , the Resondent must have kept all these documents in tact. Further, Ex.M2 to M6 are official documents produced in the regular business . I find this Tribunal can rely on these documents and the railway management has taken much pains to enforce conditions and screened the piece rate employees as per the settlement .

10. The learned counsel for the Petitioners contended that all the documents , attendance register and other things , are with the Respondent / Raillway Administration and he has filed a petition to produce the documents and the railway department has not produced the same and therefore, an adverse inference is to be drawn in the circumstances shown by the Petitioners and their contention is to be accepted. But, I find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioners because the petition filed by the Petitioners for production of documents was dismissed by this Tribunal and no revision or W.P. was filed against the said order and under such circumstnaces, it cannot be said that an adverse inference can be drawn in these circumstances .

11. Again, the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that out of more than 400 piece rate employees, the Respondent/Management has picked and chosen 62 employees and they were made permanent leaving the rest without giving any work and such action of the Respondent /Management is discriminatory and in violation of labour legislations and Constitution of India.

14. Learned counsel for the Respondent contended that ifthe railway department has actually employed these piece rate labourers as Casual Labourers , then they must have been issued with appointment orders or any such thing, but on the other hand, the Petitioners have not produced any such papers to show that they were appointed by the Respondent/Management . From this, it is clear that they were engaged on contract basis as piece rate labourers. Further, from Ex. W2 series , it is clear that even after the closure of T.P. Shed at Arakkonam they were employed by railway department as contract labourers for the work and for which duty passes were issued to some of the Petitioners . Under such circumstances , it cannot be contended that the petitioners were urider employment of the railway management and they had worked continuously nearly seven to fifteen years as alleged by them . The learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that even though the Petitioners produced Ex.WI which is a letter addressed by the representative of the workers Mr. D. Palani to the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central) in the year 1985 and the reference was made only on the dispute raised by the representative in the year 1994 and therefore , this claim is required to bedismissed on the ground of delay in raising the dispute. The learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that even though the law does not prescribe any time limit for the labourers to raise dispute , it cannot be said that the Petitioner can raise a dispute at any point oftime. It is anadmitted fact that T.P. Shed at Arakkonam was closed in the year 1980 and only after a lapse of 14 years, the Petitioners have raised a dispute which is stale , belated and also time barred . The learned counsel for the Respondent relied on the rulings reported in 1998 I SLJ 117 STATE BANK OF INDORE VS. GOVINDARAO wherein the Supreme Court held "High Court should not have entertained the petitioner after such a long period of ten years" and he also relied on ruling reported in 12. As against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that at the time of closure of the T.P. Shed at Arakkonam only 219 piece rate labourers were working and not 315 as alleged by the Petitioners and the proposal for alternative employment to 219 labourers were discussed with organised labour representatives of piece rate labourers and a settlement was arrived at for absorption of labourers under certain conditions and most important conditions are that they should have put in five years ofcontinuous service as piece rate workers and they should not have been absented for more than 180 days continuously and they should not have crossed the age of 45 years and their absorption is subject to their being declared medically fit under B- 1 and C- 1 category and out of the 219 piece rate labourers only 62 of them had satisfied the above conditions and they were absorbed on the basis of Ex.M2 to M6 and in the year 1984 the Chief Personnel Officer of the Respondent/ Management has clearly stated that on the issue of absorption of piece rate labourers in T.P. Shed, absorption of62 laboures who had beeen taken as per the conditions and under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Respondent has picked and chosen some of the persons discriminatorily.

7473

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

argued that the Tribunal cannot go behind the scope of reference .

BALBIR SINGH Vs. PUNJAB ROADWAYS AND ANOTHER 2001 (2) LLN 118 , wherein the Supreme Court has held that "the High Court has rightly dismissed the Writ Petition and held that there were no grounds to interfere with the exercise ofjudicial discretion by the Tribunal " and relying on these decisions, he argued that after fifteen years of the closure of T.P. Shed and without giving any valid reason for the delay in raising the dispute , the petitioner's claim cannot be entertained and it should be rejected.

17. But , here again , I find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner because when the Respondent has alleged in the Counter Statement that the petitioners were not regular employees and they were piece rate workers engaged by the contractors and they have no control over them , the initial burden is upon the Petitioners to prove that they were engaged by the Respondent directly and they had worked under the Respondent/Management continuously for seven to fifteen years . But, the Petitioners have not adduced any satisfactory reliable evidence to prove that they were engaged by the Respondent directly and they were paid by the Respondent directly. Under such circumstances , I find there is no point in the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Further, the judgement in W.P. No. 171/86 by the Supreme Court was passed on the compromise entered into between the workers of T.P. Shed, Trichy with the Railway management . Further, it is judgeinent in personam . Even assuming for argument sake that it is applicable to the Petitioners in this case , on the date of raising the dispute in this case , the Petitioners were not under the control of the railway department i.e. in the year 1994 and as such , I find the judgement of the Supreme Court in W.P. No. 171/86 is not applicable to the Petitioners in this case .

15. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Petitioner argued that even in the year 1983 the representative of the Petitioners had given a representation to Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) and also to the Ministry of Labour and Secretary and the Govt . has not taken any initiative and it was referred only in the year 1997, and under such circumstances , it cannot be said that it is the mistake of the petitioner for the dealy. But, I find there is no point in the contention of the petitioner because , this reference is made only on the claim raised by the Petitioner in the year 1994. It is an admitted fact of both sides that the T.P. Shed at Arakkonam has been closed in the year 1980 and therefore , the Petitioner has to give valid reason for delay in approaching the labour authorities . But , the Petitioners have not stated any valid reason for the delay of fifteen years . Under such circumstances , I find the delay in raising the dispute as laches on the part of the Petitioners and on this ground alone , the claim is to be rejected.

18. Further, the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that witnesses examined on behalf ofthe Petitioners namely Mr. Jayseelan has admitted in his cross examination that they were engaged by one Mr. Rajamanickam , CTC and they were not issued with appointment order by the railway department . Therefore, it is clear that they were engaged on contract basis as piece rate labourers and as per the judgement of the Supreme Court and also the judgements of High Courts , neither appointment letter was issued by railway mangement nor salary was paid directly by the Respondent/Railway and therefore , merely because the Petitioners were asked to work under railway yard by an officer, who was not competent to make appointment would not make the Petitioners to have a right to claim for appointment . Further, they cannot be said to be workmen for the purpose of Industrial Disputes Act . He further contended that WWI has also admitted that after the clousre of T.P. Shed , an alternative employment to the said piece rate labourers was discussed with Mr. John , Secetary of Loading and Unloading Mazdoor Union , representative of the piece rated labourers and they were arrived at a settlement for absorption of workers under certain conditions and out of 219 piece rate labourers , 62 persons have been absorbed on the basis of above agreement and which was also admitted by the petitioners as per Ex.M3 to M6 . Under such circumstances , it is not contended that the Respondent has not followed the 16. But . at this juncture , the learned counsel for the Petitioners raised a curious argument stating that the reference was made that whether the Railways is justified in refusing to consider Sri D. Palani and other 315 T.P. Shed ex - employees in regularising their services in the light of regularisation of T.P. Shed workmen of Trichirappalli based on the judgement of Supreme Court in W.P. No. 171/1986 and therefore , the burden in this case is to give a reason for refusing to consider the request of the Petitioner is upon the Respondent and the Respondent has not adduced any evidence with regard to this contention . Under such circumstances , this Tribunal cannot go into the question whether the Petitioners have proved that they were employed by the Respondent / Management for more than seven to fifteen years and whether the claim of the Petitioners is a belated one . Similarly, he further argued that the Govt . while referring the matter to this Tribunal has also mentioned whether the Respondent/Management is justified in unilaterally terminating the scrvices of 316 workmen without complying with the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and therefore , the burden in this case is upon the Respondent to substantiate their contention of terminating the services of Petitioners and it should not be placed on the Petitioners and he relied on the some of the rulings 1979 LIC 821 , 1966 11 LLJ 194 , 1961 1 LLJ 178 and 7474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKΑ 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

a conclusion that a workman had in fact worked for 240 days in a year. No proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days , or order or record of appointment or engagementfor this period was producedby the workman and on this ground alone the award is liable to be set aside . " Under such circumstances , when the Petitioners have not produced any document to show that they were worked under the Respondent/Management for more than 240 days or seven to fifteen years continuously as alleged by them, they cannot claim any relief in this dispute raised by them.

19. 1 find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent . Through the Petitioners have alleged that they were directly appointed by railway management and they have received salary directly from the railway management , they have not produced any document to prove their contention and therefore , they cannot take advantage from vague inferences to be drawn from the documents produced by them. Since the burden of proving the contention is upon the Petitioners and since the Petitioners, have not substantiated their contention , I find these two points against the Petitioners .

Point No. 3 :

The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

20 In view of my finding that the Pctitioners have not substantiated their contention that they were employed by the Respondent/ Management directly and they had worked more than 240 days in a continuous period , I find the Petitioners are not entitled to any relief as prayed for . No Costs .

21. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him. corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 9th August . 2004)

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

For the I Party/Workmen

: WWI Sri K. Jayaseelan WW2 Sri D. Gopal

For the 11 Party /Managnient : MWI Sri H. Prithiviraj

Documents marked :

For the 1 Party/Workman:

Ex . No. Date

Description

W1 12-08-85 Xerox copy of the industrial dispute raised by Petitioners before Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) .

judgement in W.P. No. 171/86. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that some of the Transhipment Labourers Association, Trichy filed O.A. No. 346/92 before Central Administrative Tribunal , Madras Bench based on the judgement of Supreme Court in W.P. No. 171/86 . In the said O.A. , the Central Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the petition on the ground that the applicants approached after a long delay and they have not established any right and it also observed that all the piece rated labourers who were in active engagement were extended the benefit of Supreme Court judgement . However, the applicants therein were not Petitioners before Supreme Court to extend the benefits , to all those who had worked as piece rate labourers in transhipment slied , Trichy since its inception . The spirit of the Supreme Court order is to extend the benefits to the Petitioners in that case only. Thus , it is clear that the Supreme Court judgement in W.P. No. 171/86 is to extend the benefits to the Petitioners in that case only i.e. it is a judgement in personam . Further, he argued that the petitioners in this case have not disputed or challenged the closure of T.P. Shed at Arakkonanı and their non- employment in any forum in the year 1980 itself. Therefore , their claim after a lapse of 14 years is not justifiable. Further , the transhipment of goods yard workers filed another O.A. No. 1361/2000 before the Central Administrative Tribunal based on the Supreme Court judgement in W.P. No. 171/86 . The Central Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the petition on the ground that the applicants approched after a long delay and they have not established their case . He further argued that though WW2 has produced certain documents and claimed that he was the employce of railway management. on a perusal of Ex . W7 , it cannot be said that WW2 was a workman in railway department for more than 15 years . Further. Ex . W7 alleged to have been given by Station Superintendent. Arakkonam was in the year 1983. It is not known how the alleged Station Superintendent has got power to issue the said certificate in the year 1983. when he cannot have worked more than three years in the same station . Furthermore , the Petitioner has not examined the said Station Supreintendent before this Court to prove under what authority he has issued this certificate when he has no authority to issue the same . because in Respondent/ Railways only the Personnel Department has power to issue service certificate of an employee . Further. when the witness WW2 has not produced any document to show the identity card issued by railway department or LT1 card number issued by Railway Department , it cannot be said that this document is a genuine one and therefore, this Court can not rely on this document . Learned counsel for the Respondent further argued that Supreme Court in RANGE FOREST OFFICER Vs. S.T. HADIMONEY 2002 3 SLJ 316 held that " mere filing of affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that cannot be regarded as sufficient evidence for any Court to cometo [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

7475

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

W2 series Nil

Xerox copy of the emergent duty passes issued by Respondent .

W3 Nil

Xerox copy of the office order issuedby Resondent For absorption ofpiece rate labourers .

W4 23-12-93 Xerox copy of the representation given by Petitioner to Chief Labour Commissioner , New Delhi .

W5 series Nil

Xerox copy of the photo identity cards issued to Petitioners .

W6 17-01-81 Xerox copy of the hospital permit issued to Mr. Durai By Respondent .

W7 08-02-83 Xerox copy of the service certificate issued to Mr. D. Gopal .

For the II Party/Management :

Ex. No. Date

Description MI

18-05-81 Xerox copy of the letter from Mr. John , General Secretary To Respondent/Management .

M2 02-06-81 Xerox copy of the letter issued by Senior Divisional Personnel Officer regarding absorption of piece rate Labourers .

M3 08-06-81 Xerox copy of the office order of Respondent regarding absorption ofpiece rate Labourers .

M4 08-07-81 Xerox copy of the office order of Respondent regarding absorption ofpiece rate Labourers .

M5 06-02-82 Xerox copy of the office order of Respondent regarding absorption ofpiece rate Labourers .

M6 29-05-84 Xerox copy of the letter of Senior Divisional Personnel Officer regarding engagement of Piece rate labourers as Casual labourers

15-03-84 Xerox copy of the letter of Chief Personnel Officer Regarding absorption of piece rate labourers .

M8 08-01-86 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent/Management to Labour Enforcement Officer , Chennai regarding absorption of piece rate labourers.

18-07-94 Xerox copy of the order of Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. Nos . 835 to 845/92 .

3139 Gi/04-49

M10 16-11-94 Xerox copy of the order of Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 346/92.

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2760.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या आई . डी. 47/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/19/92- आई. आर. ( बी. 1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th October, 2004

S.O. 2760. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I. D. No. 47/ 92) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court- II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-10-2004.

[No. L- 12012/ 19/92- IR(B. 1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer. L.D. No. 47/92

Sh. Ravindra Kumar Khanna , S/o Sh. Budh Ram , E- 1 /9 , Rana Pratap Bagh , Delhi - 110007.

Versus

The Manager, State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, Head Office , Tilak Marg , Post Box No. 154 , Jaipur-302005.

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 19/92/IR (B - I ) , Central Government, Dt . 13-05-1992 has referred the following point for adjudication.

7476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] The point runs as hereunder:-

and the Regional Manager , Muzaffarnagar confirmed the suspension of the agency of the claimant . The claimant was not acting bonafide . He has not deposited the money collected from the customers so the explanation was called and he was forbidden to collect money and subsequently, the contract was revoked by the competent authority.

"Whether Shri Ravindra Kumar Khanna, Deposit Collector, was a workman of the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur ? If so , whether the action of the management of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur in terminating the services of Shri Ravindra Kumar Khanna w.e.f. 18-12-1984 was justified ? If not, to what relief Shri Khanna is entitled ? "

The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has reiterated the averments of the statement of claim in his rejoinder. Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

The claimant has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim it has been stated that the Bank had introduced a scheme for mobilization of deposits at the door steps of the prospective small depositors in order to augment its deposits and business . The bank for this purpose had appointed the " Deposit collectors " . The workman applicant was Deposit Collector at Muzaffarnagar Branch of the bank w.e.f. 05-05-1977 and executed an agreement . He had worked for 7½ years without giving any cause of complaint about his work , theManager of the said Branch served on the workman a letter dated 18-12-1984 , calling his explanation for allegedly not depositing with the bank certain sums stated to have been collected by him and the workman by the said letter was forbidden from making any further collections from the depositors pending receipt of his reply/ explanation to the said letter .

The Ministry of Finance forwarded the complaint of the workman to the Customer Service Centre for banks . 'Subsequently, it v'as forwarded to the Regional Manager of the bank at New Delhi and the bank was asked to. examine the representation of the workman expeditiously and favourably but the bank gave no response to the workman's letters dt. 9-5-1989 and 17-08-89 . The Regional Manager of the bank , by a letter dt . 10-01-1990 wrote to the customer services cell that no deposit collector was now working in the Branch Office , Muzaffarnagar and the matter may be treated as closed. Such action of the workman is against the provisions of the contract entered into between the parties. He shall be deemed to be employed in industry. It shall be deemed that his services have been terminated by the bank by way of refusal to give him work from 8-12-1984 .

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement, it has been stated that Conciliation proceedings were started at Dehradun . U.P. but the reference was made to Central Government Industrial Tribunal , New Delhi in place of Kanpur. As such, the court lacks jurisdiction.

Heard arguments from the side of the management . The workman is not turning up for almost one year despite knowledge of the case . However , written arguments have been filed on behalf of the workman as well as the management . It has been submited from the side of the workman that the bank should have given three months notice before termination of his services and in case misappropriation of money collected by him is proved, then only his agency can be terminated . He shall be deemed to be a workman of an industry so he should have beengiven notice and retrenchment compensation but the bank all of a sudden forbade him to collect money from the customers and subsequently, Regional Manager terminated his agency. It was submitted from the side of the management that it has been mentioned in Annexure W/ I that the bank may without notice terminate the agency at any time if the deposit collector commits breach of agreement and rules and regulations . Since the workman has not deposited the entire money collected by him , so in view of para 4 of the schemedt. 11-4-1986, his agency was terminated. The workman applicant was simply an agent of the bank and he was not an employee of the bank . The bank had no control over him. He may collect money from the depositors at any time. He was paid commission on the collected money. As such , the workman is not an employee. He did not deposit Rs . 1100 collected by him from Shri S. C. Aggarwal , deposit holder under the Janta Deposit Scheme. Account No. 1430. The workman has agreed that Mr. S. C. Aggarwal has given him money vide letterdt . 18-12-1984 and of which he has acknowledged. In view of the judgement of Jt - 1992 (3 ) SC, 290, he was a commission agent and the contract of a commision agent can be terminated at any time according to the terms and conditions of the agreement . It has been submitted from the side of the workman that the Hon'ble High Court of Madras has held that when once the deposit collector satisfied the definition ofworkman, it is not open to the bank to rely on Banking Regulation Act and such person is independent contractor.

That the claimant was never given any appointment letter and he never marked his attendance on the Muster Roll of the management . No particular or regular duties have ever been assigned to the claimant as compared to the regular employees .

That there was a complaint from the customers that he had not deposited money so letter was issued to him

The workman applicant was a pigmy agent and a pigmy agent will ever remain a pigmy agent . He has not deposited Rs . 1100 deliberately so he has committed breach of para 4 of the scheme and for such breach, the 7477

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

I. D. No. 45/93

In the matter of:

Sh . Ram Pratap through The General Secretary, SBI Staff Association , 2124/2 , Harisingh Nalwa Street No. 58, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005.

Versus

condition has been stipulated that the agency may be terminated at any time without notice . The bank has acted in terms of the scheme of 1986. In such circumstances , the bank has committed no irregularity and no illegality. The workman was simply a pigmy agent of the bank and he was not an employee of the bank in view of the judgement in the Bangalore Water Supply of the Hon'ble Supreme Court . The law cited by the workman is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case.

The reference is replied thus :-

The Asstt . General Manager, State Bank of India, Delhi Zonal Office, Post Box No. 675 , 11 , Sansad Marg . New Delhi - 110001 .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 179/92-1R (B - 1 ). Central Government , Dt . 09-12-1992 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder:-

Shri Ravindra Kumar Khanna , Deposit Collector . was not a workman of the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and the action of the management of the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur in terminating the services of Shri Ravindra Kumar Khanna w.c.f. 18-12-84 is justified. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt . 04-10-2004

R. N. RAI . Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the management of the State Bank of India in dismissing Shri Ram Pratap from service w.e.f. 15-05-1991 was legal and justified ? If not , to what relief( s ) the workman is entitled to and from what date ?"

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

The workman has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim it has been stated:

1. That the workman was appointed as Temporary Messenger on 15-10-1980 at South Extn. Part- 1. New Delhi Branch .

का. आ. 2761.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. नम्बर 45/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. That the workman was absorbed in permanent service on 03-05-1983 at Roop Nagar, Delhi Branch.

[सं. एल -12012/179/92- आई.आर. ( बी. 1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

3. That the workman was transferred from Roop Nagar. Delhi branch to Green Park Extn .. New Delhi branch on 25-03-1985.

New Delhi , the 8th October , 2004

4. That the workman was charge sheeted on 17-08-1988 for the following alleged charges:-- S.O. 2761. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( 1. D. No. 45/ 93) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court - 11 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 7-10-2004 .

[No. L - 12012/ 179/ 92 - IR ( B . 1 ) | C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

"( 1 ) . Out of the Cheque Book No. 005051 to 005075 issued against his Savings Bank Account No. 9740 maintained at Green Park Extension Branch , he attempted to fraudulently encash Cheque No. 005068 for Rs . 20.000 by forging the signature/ initial of Smt . Pushpa Bhola . Savings Bank Incharge as also by writing in his own lands lictitious scroll number 165 and Cash scroll number E - 19.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE ,

NEW DELHI

(2) When he failed to obtain cash payment of the said Cheque No. 005068 he connived with one Shri Chander Pal Yadav to obtain payment thereof through clearing . The cheque drawn by forging signatures of Shri K. J. Chandra , Savings Bank Account Shri R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer.

7478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

No. 4493 was deposited in Shri Yadav's account maintained at Vijaya Bank , Ansari Road , Delhi . On 14-04-1988 , when the cheque was received at Green Park Branch , he surreptitiously removedat and it was recovered from his person. It was noticed thathe had also embossed on it Account No. 10551 over Account No. 4493 as the latter account did not have sufficient funds to meet the cheque on the said date i.e. 14-04-1988 .

( 3 ) On 21-03-1988 , you surreptitiously removed from the table of Shri V. K. Malhotra a draft No. 602509 dated 17-03-1988 for Rs . 5000 issued by Makrana Branch and deposited at the Branch by one Ms. Manju Jain, holder of Savings Bank Account No. 12012. He handed over the said draft to Sri Bal Kishan , Messenger at Rail Bhawan Branch for fraudulently obtaining payment thereof. Not only this , after the payment of this draft was made by Green Park Extension Branch , He again removed the paid draft from Bank's record and delivered it to Shri Bal Kishan .

(4) Out of another Cheque Book No. 760726 to 760750 issued to him , he issued Cheque No. 760747 for Rs . 20,000 in favour of Shri E. Jacob and himselfdeposited it in his Savings Bank Account No. 4434 at Syndicate Bank , Hauz Khas , New Delhi . On 06-04-1988 , when the cheque was received atGreen Park Branch in clearing, he entered it in Transfer Scroll at Sl . No. 98 , posted it in the account of Shri Ashok Kumar Pradhan, Savings Bank Account No. 8878 , on the date of 08-04-1988 ; entered it in respective day book and modified the Savings Bank Account summary. Not only this , after the clean cash book was balanced, you surreptitiously removed the said cheque from records and destroyed it.

The above charges , if proved , would tantamount to gross misconduct in terms of paragraph 521 ( 4 ) ( J ) of Sastry Award read with paragraph 18.28 of Desai Award. " (5) That the enquiry in the case of workman started on 16-3-89 and took place on 26-4-89 , 15-5-89 , 6-7-89 , 21-7-89 , 10-9-89 , and 12-12-90 . That the workman and his defence counsel attended the enquiry proceedings on all the above noted dates except on 6-7-89 when the workman was sick.He sent his medical certificate through his defence counsel but the enquiry officer

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

was biased and he gave the unjustified ruling asunder:-

"Submission of medical certificate appears to be delaying tactics . I have decided to complete the enquiry ex -parte ."

That since the first date of so called departmental enquiry, the enquiry officer was biased and vindictive and was conniving with the bank representative .

1 (6) That upto 10-9-89 , neither the workman nor his defence representative asked for the adjournment except for one date i.e. 6-7-89 on medical grounds and on that date the biased enquiry officer threatened to close the enquiry ex- parte . That ultimately on 10-1-91 , the biased enquiry officer closed the enquiry ex - parte against him without proving alleged charges and providing any opportunityto the workman and the defence counsel . That out of 23 witnesses as listed by the bank representative in support of the bank'scase, 22 witnesses were from the same branch where enquiry proceedings were conducted . Despite repeated threatening postures given by the management they did not turn up. Only three witneses those too from the suprevising staff could be produced byadopting allthe pressure tactics and even at this stage nothing could be proved .

(7) That after the above mentioned date the biased enquiry officer did not hold enquiry for more than one year for mala fide reasons . That all of a sudden the workman received a communication from the enquiry officer that he should appear on 12-12-90 for further proceedings alongwith his defence counsel . That the workman was very much shocked to receive this communication as upto this stage the bank has not provided him or his defence counsel copies of the so-called departmental enquiry. His defence counsel objected in this regard as under on 12-12-90 .

"The enquiry is taking place after a lapse of 9 months, I would like to study the statement givenby the previous witnesses . The copies of previous proceedings /statements may be given to me . In the absence of such documents . I am not in a position to continue with the enquiry. "

That the biased enquiry officer instead of providing the relative copies of previous enquiry proceedings fixed the next date of hearing on 10-1-1991 and held the enquiry 7479

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

ex-parte. That from the above noted submissions it is very much clear that the enquiry officer was biased and vindictive since very beginning against him . The enquiry officer held the enquiry ex-parte illegally and arbitrarily, proved all the charges violating all the norms/ethics of principles of natural justice and without giving any-chance to the wrokman to prove hisinnocence.

(8) That it was the duty of the enquiry officer conducting the enquiry to make it clear to the workman that he had a right not only to cross examine the witness of the management but also to examine his witnesses in defence , but this was not done. That the workman was granted personal hearing by the punishing authority which was a formal personal hearing and a sham- show.

may be debited to the account of Sh . Chandra . Prior to this date, on 14-4-88 (when the above occurrence took place) , Sh. Pratap had also made a unsuccessful attempt to take cash payment of the said cheque by forging the signatures ofthe passing officer and had also put on it a scroll No. 165 falsely and cash scroll No. E- 19 to suggest that the instrument had been processed for cash payment . Having failed to receive the cash payment of the cheque , Sh . Pratap in connivance with Sh. Chanderpal Yadav, who is maintaining a S /B A/c at Vijaya Bank, Ansari Road, Delhi conspired to encash the same and consequently, the cheque was deposited into the account of Sh . Chanderpal Yadav at Vijaya Bank . Ansari Road, Delhi and the same was presented to Green Park Extension Branch of the respondent bank and it was presented on 14-4-88 and the above occurrence occurred. Sh . Pratap removed the cheque with a view to change the Account No. from 4493 which he forged the earlier to Account No. 10551 as the earlier account did not have the sufficient balance to honour the cheque and the newly forged account had a credit balance of Rs . 80,000 .

Another attempt of fraud was made by Sh . Ram Pratapby stealing a draft No. 602509 dated 17-3-88 issued by State Bank of India, Makrana Branch and drawn on Green Park Extn . Branch for Rs . 5,000 favouring Mrs. Manju Jain who was holding a S/B A/ c at the Green Park Extn . Branch . The said draft was deposited by Mrs. Manju in the aforesaid account on 21-3-88. When the said draft could not be credited to the account of Mrs. Manju Jain, the enquiries made revealed that the said draft has been stealithly removed by Sh. Ram Pratap from the table of staff member handling the draft desk . The said draft was delivered by Sh . Ram Pratap to Sh. Bal Kishan , who was working as messenger at Rail Bhawan Branch of the respondent Bank . Yet another attempt was made by Sh . Ram Pratap to defraud the Bank as he was also issued a cheque book containing the cheques No. 760726 to 760750 on 20-2-87 . Out of this cheque book, Sh. Pratap issued cheque No. 760747 for Rs . 20,000 in favour of Mr. E. Jacob who was holding a S/B A/c at Syndicate Bank , Hauz Khas , New Delhi .

The management had denied most of the paragraphs ofstatement of claim .

The claimant had filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder , he has denied most of the paragraphs of the written statement .

Themanagement has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been stated that the Industrial Dispute raised by the claimant is not justified as he was found guilty of committing acts of misconducts which relate to committing of frauds, falsification of accounts after holding a free and fair enquiry. The bank is a financial institution and the employees of the bank have got fiducial relationship with it i.e. relationship of trust and misappropriation, falsification of accounts, acts of frauds are anti -thesis of trust . The misconduct relating to the aforesaid act is always recognised as a serious/gross misconduct on the part of the employee and the imposition of penalty of dismissal is completely justified and commensurate to the proved misconduct. The brief facts of the case are that Sh. Ram Pratap was working as messenger at Green Park Extn. branch of the respondent bank. Being a staff member he was maintaining a S /B A/c No. 9740 at the branch. He was issued cheque book containing cheques No. 005051 to 005075 on 16-9-87 . On 14-4-88 , a difference ofRs . 20,000 was absorbed while balancing the account of books of the bank . The enquiry of the branch staff revealed that a cheque received from VijayaBank. Ansari Road, Delhi issued from the aforesaid cheque book of Sh . Ram Pratap for Rs . 20,000 is missing. As the cheque book containing the above cheque leaf had been issued to Sh . Ram Pratap, the enquiries were made from him and on suspicion when the pockets of Sh. Ram Pratap were checked, the cheque was recovered from his pocket .After recovering the cheque from his pocket the following things were observed :

The workman has examined himself and he has been cross-examined by the management and the management has also adduced evidence . The issue regarding fairness of the enquiry was not pressed as a preliminary issue .

Sh. Ram Pratap had signed the cheque as K. G. Chandra who was maintaining another S /B A/c No. 4493 thereby forging the signatures of Sh. K. G. Chandra with the intention that the cheque 7480

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/KARTIKA 8 , 1926

enquiry has been concluded in haste . The workman applicant has not been given even the reasonable opportunity to cross -examine the management's witnesses. He has notbeen given opportunity to lead his evidence in defence. From the conduct of the enquiry officer , it appears that he sat for the enquiry on 12-12-1990 to conclude the enquiry hurriedly. Heavens would not have fallen had he given one day for the enquiry or one day for the evidence in defence . It amply establishes the fact that the enquiry officer was pre-determined to conclude the enquiry that day whether the applicant was present or absent. It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant did not turn up for 2 hours . The enquiry officer waited for two hours and thereafter he concluded the enquiry. This establishes the fact that after a long gap of 9 months , there was one sitting of the enquiry and that was on 12-12-1990 and enquiry was concluded ex-parte.

From the side of the management , my attention was drawn to 1962- II LLJ 498. In this case, the charge sheeted person deliberately avoided attending the enquiry or boycotted the proceedings of the departmental enquiry, it is open for the enquiry officer to proceed ex-parte . This judgement is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record. It was submitted from the side of the workman that enquiry is ex -parte. The documents were not given to him and enquiry was concluded without giving him any documents . The enquiry was concluded in the absence of the workman applicant. The enquiry officer concluded the enquiry hastily without giving him any opportunity to produce evidence in defence . He was not permitted to cross - examine the management's witnesses . He was not given personal hearing and he was also not given copy of the proceedings of the enquiry. The enquiry was concluded after 5.00 P.M. on the same day after taking evidence of the management's witnesses . In case the workman was not present for his defence , a date should have been given for his defence but the E.O. was biased and he concluded the enquiry ex-parte on 12-12-1990 . This date was given after 9 months as the enquiry officer has admitted that enquiry is taking place after a lapse of 9 months . After 9 months , the enquiry was re - opened and it was concluded on one and the same date i.e. 12-12-1990 . It was further submitted that the enquiry officer was not in a hurry for 9 months . He re- opened enquiry after 9 months on 12-12-1990 and on that very day, he concluded the enquiry ex-parte . It was further submitted that such haste indicates prejudiced mind of the E.O. The principles of natural justice have not been followed. The E. O. has mentioned in the enquiry proceedings as follows:-

In LLJ 1961 1961 II 414 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case, the charge sheeted employee withdrew from the enquiry after two witnesses were examined as a result of some dispute and the enquiry officer closed the enquiry ex -parte , the dismissal on the basis of this enquiry was, held invalid . This judgement is not also applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case.

"As the enquiry is taking place after a lapse of 9 months This statement of enquiry officer shows that he started enquiry after a lapse of 9 months and he did not give any other date but he decided the enquiry ex -parte. The enquiry officer has been examined and he has admitted in his cross- examination :-

My attention was drawn to AIR 1962 SC 1344 and 1986 ( I) SLR ALL 23. In both the cases, the charge sheeted employee has declined to take part in the enquiry or withdrew himself from the enquiry as such , enquiry in this case was held ex - parte . The Hon'ble Apex Court in 1988 (4 ) SCC 619 has held that in ex- parte enquiry, the enquiry officer has to be more cautious . Several other rulings have been cited from the side of the management and from the side of the workman. I have gone through all the citations . In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is fully established that the enquiry was concluded in a haste with a prejudice and pre - determined mind . The law cited by the management is not applicable . The enquiry is not fair and it is liable to be set aside.

" since nobody was present on the last date of hearing and the workman was proceeded against again ex - parte so no opportunity was given to the workman to lead defence evidence . The workman had told him that he was going to bring his defence representative but he did not turn up even after the expiry of two hours so he was proceeded ex- parte . No notice was sent to the workman thereafter ". This indicates that the entire enquiry was concludedjust after two hours . The workman might not have got his defence representative so he did not come within two hours but the enquiry was concluded in his absence and he was held guilty. No notice was given to him thereafter as has been admitted by the E. O. himself.

I have perused the proceedings of the enquiry and it transpires from the perusal of the enquiry that the

From the above discussions , it becomes quite apparent that the E. O. has not applied his mind . He has acted in haste and his finding is not supported by impartial evidence and the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority have not also applied their mind judiciously. In such circumstances , the enquiry stands vitiated. In this case , prínciples of natural justice have not been followed 7481 [ भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 30, 2004/कार्तिक 8 , 1926

Ref. No. L-41012 /80/2003- IR (B- I) dated 30-10-2004

BETWEEN

and the workman applicant has not been afforded opportunity to defend himself. The enquiry report becomes non-existent .

Hari Lal Singh S/o Shri Rajman Singh The reference is replied thus:-

Vishnupur P.O. Piprai

Distt. Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh

AND

The Dy. Chief Engineer ( Constn . & Survey ) , North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur-273001 .

AWARD

The action of the management of the State Bank of India in dismissing Shri Ram Pratap from service w.e.f. 15-05-1991 was neither legal nor justified. The workman is entitled to be restored to the position prior to the date of the award of punishment . The management may re - open the enquiry and conclude it after giving reasonable opportunity to the workman and following the principles of natural justice.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt . 01-10-2004 .

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L - 41012 / 80/2003 - IR( B - I ) dated 30-10-2004 has referred following dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow for adjudication :

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2004

"Whether the action of the management of N.E. Railway in terminating the services of Shri Hari Lal Singh w.e.f. 15-5-82 is legal and justified ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to ? " का. आ. 2762.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार उत्तर पूर्वी रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. नं. 21/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 07-10-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/80/2003 - आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th October, 2004

The reference order was endorsed to Hari Lal Singh the workman and the Dy. Chief Engineer ( Constn . & Survey) , NER, Gorakhpur . The reference order was received in Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Lucknow on 22-3-2004 but the workman did not file any statement of claim till 21-4-2004 . Thereafter, the Presiding Officer ordered the issuance of registered notice to the workman with direction to file statement of claim complete with relevant documents , list of reliance and witnesses by 28-5-2004. The registered notice was issued to the workman on 22-4-2004 vide receipt No. 297 dated 23-4-2004 . The office has informed thatthe registered article containing notice to the workman did not return , unserved in the Tribunal till 8-7-2004 as such , service of notice upon the workman was presumed and the Presiding Officer ordered to issue notice to the opposite party to file written statement .

S.O. 2762.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID. No. 21/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of North Eastern Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 07-10-2004.

[No. L - 41012/ 80/2003-1R( B - 1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT :

Shrikant Shukla , Presiding Officer.

I.D. No. 21/2004

Shri R.D. Agarwal , advocate appeared in compliance of the notice before the Tribunal on behalf of railways on 17-8-2004 and filed his authority and sought time to file written statement , which was allowed , and 22-9-2004 was fixed for written statement . Today i.e. on 22-9-2004 Sh . R.D. Agarwal is present and has filed application C -6 , requesting therein that since the workman has not filed any statement of claim to the fact that the order of termination was illegal , therefore , no clainı award may be passed. He has argued that it was for the workman to have stated the fact that order of termination was illegal or unjustified . Since no statement of claim has come forward it is not obligatory on the part of employer to file anywritten statement . He has relied on 1981 (29) 194 FLR Allahabad High Court . V.K. Raj Industries Vs. Labour 7482

[PART II-SBC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 30 , 2004/ KARTIKA 8 , 1926

Chapter- V and VI [ except Sub- Section ( 1) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely :--

"Areas comprising in the Revenue village of Asfabad in Pargana, Tehsil and District Firozabad."

[No. S -38013/78/2004- S.S. - I ]

K.C. JAIN , Director

नई दिल्ली, 7 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2764. राष्ट्रपति , श्री राजेश कुमार को 24-9-2004 ( पूर्वा. ) से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह- श्रम न्यायालय , चंडीगढ़ में पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करते हैं ।

Court(I) and others . The learned representative of opposite partyhas argued that the Hon'bleHigh Court of Allahabad has laid down the principle of law holding that when the workman does not appear nor produce evidence before the court, the court has no jurisdiction to hold order illegal . It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the court must fail. In the instant case the Government has referred the dispute to this Tribunal at the instance of the aggrieved workman. Consequently, the burden lay on the workman to set out the grounds challenging the validity of the termination order and to prove that the termination order was illegal . The workman did not appear nor he produced evidence, with the result that there was no material before the court for recording a finding that the order of termination passed by the employer was unjustified or illegal .

[सं. ए-11016/ 13/ 2003-सी.एल.एस.- II ] पी.के. ताम्रकार, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th October, 2004

The argument of the learned representative of the Railway is supported by the case law in favour of the employers and in the circumstances I come to the conclusion that issue referred cannot be effectively adjudicated upon accordingly no claim award is passed.

S.O. 2764. The President is pleased to appoint Sh . Rajesh Kumar as Presiding Officer Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-Cum- Labour Court - I, Chandigarh, w.e.f. 24-09-2004 ( FN) for a period of three years .

SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

Lucknow 22-9-2004

[No. A - 11016/ 13 /2003 -CLS- II ] P. K. TAMRAKAR, Under Secy.

शहरी रोजगार और गरीबी उपशमन मंत्रालय श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2004

नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर, 2004

का. आ. 2765.- भारत सरकार एत‌द्वारा शहरी रोजगार और गरीबी उपशमन मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण में हडको स्थानीय मुख्य कार्यालय, कोलकाता को , जिसमें 80 % से अधिक अधिकारियों/ कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिये प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ( 4 ) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित करती है । का. आ. 2763.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 नवम्बर, 2004 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

[सं. ई-11014/4/2000- हिन्दी ] एम. राजामणि, संयुक्त सचिव "जिला, तहसील एवं परगना फिरोजाबाद में स्थित राजस्व ग्राम- आसफाबाद के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र। "

MINISTRY OF URBAN EMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION

New Delhi , ( he 20th October, 2004

[संख्या एस -38013/78/04 - एस.एस. - 1 ] के. सी. जैन , निदेशक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , ( he 19th October , 2004

S.O. 2765. The Government of India in pursuance of sub - rulc ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for ( he official purposes of the Union ) Rules . 1976 hereby notifies the HUDCO Local Head Office, Kolkata ander (he administrative control of the Ministry of Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation , where more than 80 % of staff have acquired working knowledge in Hindi .

[No. E- 11014/ 4/2000 -Hindi M. RAJAMANI , Jt . Secy .

S.O. 2763. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of ( he Employces State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st Nov. 2004 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and

Printedby the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road , Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi- 110054 , 2004