This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/ 0007/ 2003-05

REGD . No. DL (N) 04 /0007 / 2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 1 ]

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर 26 , 2004 जनवरी 1 , 2005 , शनिवार पौष 5 पौष 11 , 1926

No. 1 ] NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 26 , 2004 JANUARY 1 , 2005 , SATURDAY/PAUSA, 5- PAUSA 11 , 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3 -उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्व विभाग)

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर, 2004

(आय कर)

का.आ. 1.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग) के उपखंड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " द चर्च आफ साउथ इंडिया ट्रस्ट एसोसिएशन , चेन्नई " को वर्ष 2004-2005 से 2006-2007 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

3770 G1 /2004

(1) ( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसे आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 290/2004/फा. सं. 197/118/2004- आयकर नि.- 1 ]

दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) New Delhi , the 6th December, 2004

(INCOME TAX)

S. O. 1. In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub -clause (v) of clause (23 C) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " The Church of South India Trust Association , Chennai " for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment years 2004-2005 to 2006-2007 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i ) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

( ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of Section 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment ofthe objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordancewith the provisions of the Income -tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assetswill be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

[Notification No. 290/2004/F. No. 197/ 118/2004- ITA-I ]

DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 2.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2 ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 ( 23 छ ) के प्रयोजनार्थ ( i ) कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-05 से कर निर्धारध वर्ष 2014-15 तक ( दिनांक 08-11-2013 तक) अर्थात् उक्त करार के उल्लंघन की दशा में सहायक महानिदेशक ( एल आर-1 ) ,

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) दूर संचार विभाग के माध्यम से कार्यरत भारत के राष्ट्रपति तथा मैसर्स सुखकर्ता फिनट्रेड ( प्रा० ) लि० के बीच 9 दिसम्बर, 1988 के लाइसेंस करार सं. 820-43/98- एल आर में उल्लिखित 15 वर्ष की अवधि के अंत तक अथवा पहले तथा ( ii ) अवसंरचनात्मक प्रदात्री श्रेणी- I के मामले में कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-2005 से प्रभावी नीचे पैरा ( 3 ) में सूचीबद्ध उद्यम के अनुमोदन को नवीकृत किया गया है ।

2. यह अनुमोदन इस शर्त के अधीन है कि -

(i) उद्यम/उपक्रम आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 ( 23 छ) । के उपबंधों के अनुरूप होगा और उनका अनुपालन करेगा;

( ii ) केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि उद्यम/ उपक्रम:-

(क) आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2 ङ के स्पष्टीकरण ( ख ) में यथा परिभाषित पात्र कारोबार सुविधा को जारी रखना बंद कर देता है ; अथवा (ख ) खाता बहियों का रख - रखाव नहीं करता है तथा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उपनियम ( 6 ) द्वारा यथा उपेक्षित किसी लेखाकार द्वारा ऐसे खातों की लेखा परीक्षा नहीं कराता है ; अथवा (ग ) आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2ङ के उपनियम ( 6 ) द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करता है ।

3. अनुमोदित उद्यम/उपक्रम हैं :-

मैसर्स रिलायन्स कम्युनीकेशन्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लि० , बृन्दावन द्वितीय तल, श्री राम मिल्स प्रेमिसीज, गणपतराव कदम मार्ग , वोरली, मुम्बई- 400013 ( पूर्व नामित मैसर्स रिलायन्स इन्फोकोम लिमिटेड) उनकी परियोजनाके लिए ।

( i) दूर संचार विभाग के सहायक महानिदेशक के माध्यम से कार्यरत भारत के राष्ट्रपति और मैसर्स सुखकर्ता फिनट्रेड (प्रा० ) लि० के मध्य 9-11-98 के लाइसेंस करार सं. 820- 43/98 - एल आर के अन्तर्गत भारत में इन्टरनेट सेवा उपलब्ध कराने वाले उद्यम ।

( ii ) दूर संचार विभाग ( मूल सेवा समूह ) द्वारा जारी दिनांक 12-02-2001 के प्रमाण सं . 30/2001 के तहत अवसंरचना उपलब्ध कराने वाली श्रेणी- I ( फा. सं. 205 /77/ 2000- आयकर नि- II ) ( खण्ड- I ) ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 295/ 2004/फा. सं. 205/77 /2000-

आयकर नि.- II ( खण्ड-1 ) ]

निधिसिंह , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 20th December , 2004

S. O. 2. It is notified for general information that the approval to the enterprise , listed at para (3 ) below has been renewed by the Central Government for the purpose ofSection 10 ( 23G) of the Income -tax Act, 1961 , read with rule 2E ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962 ( i ) with effect from the لا

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Asstt . Year 2004-2005 to the Asstt . Year 2014-15 (upto 08-11-2013 ) i.e. upto the end ofperiod of 15 years mentioned in licence agreement No. 820-43/98 -LR dated 9th November, 1998 between President of India acting through Assistant DirectorGeneral (LR-I) , Department of Telecommunications and M/ s Sukhkarta Fintrade (P) Ltd. or earlier, in the event ofviolation of the agreement aforesaid and ( ii ) with effect from the Assessment Year 2004-2005 in the case of infrastructure Provider Category-I .

2. The approval is subject to the conditions that- (i) the enterprise/undertaking will conform to and complywiththe provisions of Section 10 (23G) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 , read with rule 2E ofthe Income-taxRules , 1962 ;

(ii) the Central Government shall withdraw this approval if the enterprise/ undertaking:-- (a) ceases to carry on the eligible business as defined in Explanation (b) to Rule 2E of I.T. Rules, 1962; or

(b) fails to maintain books of account and get such accounts audited by an accountant asrequired by Sub -rule (6) of rule 2E of the Income-taxRules , 1962; or

3. The enterprise/undertaking approved is- M/sReliance Communications Infrastructure Limited 'Brindavan ' , 2nd Floor , Shree Ram Mills Premises , Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Worli, Mumbai -400013 (Formerly M/sReliance Infocom Limited) for their projects of:

(i) providing Internet Service in India under the Licence agreement No. 820-43 /98-LRdated 9-11-98 between the President of India, acting through AssistantDirector General (LR- I ) , Department of Telecommunications and M/s Sukhkarta Fintrade (P) Ltd. and

(ii) Infrastructure Provider Category I vide certificate No. 30/2001dated 12-02-2001 issued by the Department ofTelecommunication (Basic Services group) . (F. No. 205/77 /2000 - ITA - II ) (Vol . 1) [Notification No. 295/2004/F. No. 205 /77/2000/ ITA. II (Vol.1) ] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर, 2004 (आयकर)

का.आ. 3.- सामान्य जानकारी के लिए यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधोलिखित संगठन को उसके नाम के सामने उल्लिखित अवधि के लिए आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा (1) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ " संस्था " श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है-

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

( i ) अधिसूचित संस्था अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए अलग लेखा-बहियों का रख - रखाव करेगा;

(ii ) अधिसूचित संस्थाप्रत्येक वित्तीय वर्ष के लिए अपनी वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान गतिविधियों को वार्षिक विवरणी प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 मई को अथवा उससे पहले सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग ' टेक्नोलॉजी भवन ' न्यूमहरौली रोड, नई दिल्ली-110016 को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iii ) अधिसूचित संस्थाकेन्द्र सरकार की तरफ से नामोद्दिष्ट निर्धारण अधिकारी को आयकर की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने के अतिरिक्त अपने लेखा परीक्षित वार्षिक लेखों की एक प्रति तथा अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों, जिसके लिए आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत छूट प्रदान की गई थी, के संबंध में आय एवं व्यय खाते की लेखा परीक्षा कीभी एक प्रति संगठन पर अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले ( क) आयकर महानिदेशक ( छूट ) 10, मिडिलटन रो , पांचवा तल , कलकत्ता-700071 ( ख ) सचिव, वैज्ञानिक एवं औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग तथा ( ग ) आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को प्रत्येक वर्ष 31 अक्तूबर को अथवा उससे पहले प्रस्तुत करेगा।

क्रम सं. अनुमोदित संगठन का नाम अवधिजिसके लिए अधिसूचना प्रभावी है

08-03-2000 से

31-3-2002 1. मैसर्स नेशनल ब्रेन रिसर्च सैन्टर, आई.सी.जी.ई.बी. कैम्पस, अरुणा आसफ अली मार्ग, नईदिल्ली

टिप्पणी: ( i ) उपर्युक्त शर्त ( i ) " संघ " के रूप में' श्रेणीबद्ध संगठन परलागू नहीं होगी ।

(ii ) अधिसूचित संस्था को सलाह दी जाती है कि वह अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए तीन प्रतियों में और पहले ही अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) के माध्यम से केन्द्र सरकार को आवेदनकरें । अनुमोदन के नवीकरण के लिए आवेदन पत्र कीतीन प्रतियां सचिव, वैज्ञानिक और औद्योगिक अनुसंधान विभाग को सीधे भेजी जाएंगी । [अधिसूचना सं. 298/2004/फा. सं. 203/ 111/2003- .. आयकर नि. - 11 ] निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004 (INCOME TAX)

S. O. 3. It is hereby notified for general information that the organisation mentioned below has been approved bythe Central Government for the period mentioned below, forthe purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule 6 of the 4

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

Income-tax Rules, 1962 under the category " Institution" subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The notified Institution shall maintain separate books of account for its research activities ;

(ii) The notified Institution shall furnish the Annual Return of its scientific research activities to the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, ' Technology Bhawan ' , New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi - 110016 for every financial year on or before 31st May of each year ;

(iii) The notified Institution shall submit, on behalf of the Central Government , to (a) the Director General of Income-tax ( Exemptions) , 10 Middleton Row, 5th Floor, Calcutta -700071 (b) the Secretary, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research , and (c) the Commissioner of Income -tax/Director ofIncome-tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction over the organisation , on or before the 31st October each year , a copy of its audited Annual Accounts and also a copy of audited income & Expenditure Account in respect of its research activities for which exemption was granted under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income-tax Act , 1961 in addition to the return of income tax to the designated assessing officer.

S. No.

Period for which notifica- tion is effective Name of the orga- nisation approved

8-03-2000 to 31-03-2002 M/sNational Brain Research Centre

ICGEB Campus

Aruna Asaf Ali Marg , NewDelhi

Notes

: (i ) Condition ( i ) above will not apply to the organization categorized as " Association" .

(ii) The notified Institution is advised to apply in triplicates as well in advance for further renewal of the approval , to the Central Government through the Commissioner of Income-tax/ Director of Income - tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction. Three copies of the application for renewal of approval should also be sent directly to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research .

[Notification No. 298/2004/F. No. 203 / 111/2003 /ITA. II ]

NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

(आयकर)

का.आ. 4.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड. ( 23 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " नेशनल राईफल एसोसिएशन ऑफ इंडिया,

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2000-2001 से 2002-2003 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्-

(ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसे आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय र अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पत्तियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगीं।

[अधिसूचना सं. 297/2004/फा.सं. 196/9/2004-आयकर नि.- I ]

दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004 (INCOME-TAX)

S. O. 4. In exercise of the powers conferred by the clause ( 23 ) of Section 10 of the Income -tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "National Rifle Association of India , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 2000-2001 to 2002-2003 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

specified in Sub-section (5) ofSection 11 ;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness, unless the business is incidental to the attainment ofthe objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.

[Notification No. 297/2004 /F. No. 196/9/2004 - ITA - I] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

(आयकर)

का.आ. 5.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " बैडिमंटन डेवलपमेंट ट्रस्ट जमशेदपुर " को वर्ष 1998-99 से 2000-2001 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए , उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अनुमोदित करती है, अर्थात्- (i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागूनहीं होगी, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा-पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आय- कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी।

[अधिसूचना सं. 296/2004/फा. सं. 196/7/2003- आयकर नि.- I ] दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौष 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004 (Income-tax)

S. O. 5. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause(23)ofSection 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "BADMINTON DEVELOPMENT TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR" for the purpose of the said sub -clause for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-2001 subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(1) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in Sub- section ( 5) of Section 11;

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any incomebeing profits and gains of business, unless thebusiness is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act , 1961 ;

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives. [NotificationNo. 296/2004/F. No. 196/7/2003 -ΓΤΑ- I] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2004 (आयकर)

का.आ. 6. आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उपखण्ड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा " दिल्ली कैथोलिक आर्कडायोसीज, नई दिल्ली' को वर्ष 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्-

( i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक 6

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] किऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

दिया कि श्री बी. के . गोयल @ मुन्ना, सुपुत्र श्री बाबूराम गोयल, निवासी- 6बी/35, रंग रसायन अपार्टमेंन्टस , सेक्टर -13 , रोहिणी , नई दिल्ली को निरूद्ध कर लिया जाए और केन्द्रीय कारागार, तिहाड़, नई दिल्ली में अभिरक्षा में रखा जाए ताकि उन्हें भविष्य में चीजों की तस्करी करने से रोका जा सके ।

(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के. अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

2. अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार के पास यह विश्वास करने का कारण है किपूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति फरार हो गया है या स्वयं को छिपा रखा है जिससे यह आदेश निष्पादित नहीं किया जा सकता ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 299/ 2004/फा. सं. 197/ 56/2004- आयकर नि.- I ]

दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव

3. अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्ति का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति को यह निर्देश देती है कि वह शासकीय राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशित होने के 7 दिन के भीतर पुलिस आयुक्त, दिल्लीके सम्मुख उपस्थित हो ।

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2004 (Incometax)

[फा सं. 673/20/ 2004 - सी.यू.एस.- VIII ] एन. एम. कृष्णन , उप- सचिव ( कोफेपोसा) ORDER

New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004 S. O. 6. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-clause ( v) ofclause ( 23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "DELHI CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE , NEW DELHI " for the purpose of the said sub -clause for the assessment year 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

S. O. 7. Whereas the Joint Secretary to the Government of India , specially empowered under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act , 1974 (52 of 1974) issued Order F.No. 673 /20/2004--Cus . VIII dated 19-11-2004 under the said sub -section directing that Shri B.K. Goyal@Munna S/ o Shri Baburam Goyal , R/ o 6B/35 , Rang Rasayan Apartment, Sector - 13 , Rohini , New Delhi be detained and kept in custody in the Central Jail , Tihar, New Delhi with a view to preventing him from smuggling goods infuture.

(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section ( 5) of Section 11;

2. Whereas the Central Government has reasons to believe that the aforesaid person has absconded or is concealing himself so that the order cannot be executed .

(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

3.Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs the aforesaid person to appear before the Commissioner of Police, Delhi within 7 days of the publication of this order in the Official Gazette.

(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ;

[F. No. 673/20/2004-Cus - VIII ] N. M. KRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. ( COFEPOSA) आदेश

(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

[Notification No. 299/ 2004 /F. No. 197 /56/2004 - ITA - I ] DEEPAK GARG , Under Secy.

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 7. अतः संयुक्त सचिव, भारत सरकार जिन्हें विदेशी मुद्रा संरक्षण और तस्करी निवारण अधिनियम, 1974 ( 1974 का 52) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत विशेष रूप से शक्ति प्रदान की गई है, ने उक्त उप - धारा के अधीन आदेश फाइल सं ० 673/ 20/2004- सी.यू.एस. III , दिनांक 19-11-2004 को जारी किया और यह निर्देश

का.आ. 8.-अतः संयुक्त सचिव, भारत सरकार जिन्हें विदेशी मुद्रा संरक्षण और तस्करी निवारण अधिनियम, 1974 ( 1974 का 52 ) कीधारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत विशेष रूप से शक्ति प्रदान की गई है , ने उक्त उप - धारा के अधीन आदेश फाइल सं ० 673/ 19/2004- सी.यू.एस. VIII दिनांक 17-11-2004 को जारी किया और यह निर्देश दिया कि श्री सुभाष बंसल, सुपुत्र श्री एम. एल. बंसल , निवासी-2/28 , अशोक विहार, फेस- II , दिल्ली को निरूद्ध कर लिया जाए और केन्द्रीय कारागार, तिहाड़, नई दिल्ली में अभिरक्षा में रखा जाए ताकि उन्हें भविष्य में चीजों की तस्करी करने से रोका जा सके । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3. अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्ति का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्धःद्वारा पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति को यह निर्देश देती है कि वह शासकीय राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशित होने के 7 दिन के भीतर पुलिस आयुक्त, दिल्ली के सम्मुख उपस्थित हो ।

[फा सं. 673/ 19/2004- सी.यू.एस.- VIII ] एन. एम. कृष्णन, उप- सचिव (कोफेपोसा)

ORDER

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004 S. O. 8. Whereas the Joint Secretary to the Government of India , specially empowered under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign ExchangeandPrevention of SmugglingActivities Act, 1974 (52of 1974) issued Order F.No. 673/ 19/2004-Cus . VIII dated 17-11-2004 under the said sub - section directing that Shri Subhash Bansal S/ o Shri M.L. Bansal , R/ o 2/28 , Ashok Vihar, Phase- II , Delhi be detained and kept in custody in the Central Jail , Tihar , New Delhi with a view to preventing him from smuggling goods in future.

2. Whereas the Central Government has reasons to believe that the aforesaid person has absconded or is concealing himself so that the order cannot be exécuted.

3.Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs the aforesaid person to appear before the Commissioner of Police , Delhi within 7 daysofthe publication of this order in the Official Gazette.

[F. No. 673/19/2004-Cus . VIII ] N. M. KRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. ( COFEPOSA) स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्य विभाग )

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय :- एम जे पी रूहेलखण्ड विश्वविद्यालय, बरेली ( उ.प्र. ) की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का.आ. 9.- उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 8-1-2004 की अधिसूचना सं. वी 13013/ 35/2001 - पी एम एस के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां कीजाएंगी:-

पैरा 2 पंक्ति : 1

क्रम सं. 59 : के लिए

क्रम सं . 60: पढ़ें ।

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं. 60: के लिए

क्रम सं. 61 : पढ़ें ।

अन्यविषय- वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी।

[सं. वी 13013/35/2001- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth) CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi, the 15th December , 2004 Sub:-Recognition of dental qualification ofMJP RohilkhandUniversity, Bareilly, UP S. O. 9. In para 2 of the notification No. C. 13013/ 35/2001 - PMS dated 8-1-2004 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made:-

Para 2 Line: 1 For: S.No. 59 Read: S. No. 60

Para 2 Col. 1 of Table For S. No. 60 Read: S. No. 61

The other contents remain unchanged.

[No. V. 13013/35/2001-PMS] A.K. SINGH, Under Secy.

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषयः- महाराष्ट्र यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हेल्थ साइंसेज, मासिक की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का.आ. 10.- उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 21-1-2003 की अधिसूचना सं . वी 12018/ 1/ 2002- पी एम एस के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएंगीः -

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1 क्रम सं . 57 : के लिए क्रम सं. 59 : पढ़ें । तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1 क्रम सं. 58 : केलिए क्रम सं. 60 : पढ़ें । अन्यविषय- वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[सं . वी 12018 / 1 /2002- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह , अवर सचिव

CORRIGENDUM

NewDelhi , the 15th December, 2004 Sub:-Recognition of dental qualification of Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik

S. O. 10.- In para 2 ofthe notification No. V. 12018/ 1/2002-PMS dated 21-1-2003 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made:- Para 2 Line : 1

For: S.No. 57 Read: S. No. 59

Para 2 Col. 1 of Table

For S. No. 58

Read: S. No. 60

The other contents remain unchanged .

[No. V. 12018/1/2002-PMS] A.K. SINGH, Under Secy.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

शुद्धिपत्र नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय:-अलीगढ़ मुस्लिम विश्वविद्यालय, अलीगढ़ ( उ.प्र. ) की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 11.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 23-12-2002 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12017/ 23/2002- पी एम एस के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएंगी:

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of B. R. AmbedkarUniversity, Agra..

S. O. 12. In para 2 of the notification No. V. 12017/22/96 -PMS (Part - II) dated 20-6-2002 and V- 12017/21 /95 - PMS (Vol. - II) dated 14-2-2003 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made :

Para 2 Line : 1

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1

क्रम सं. 56 : के लिए

क्रम सं. 58 : पढ़ें ।

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं. 57: के लिए

क्रम सं. 59: पढ़ें ।

अन्यविषय - वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी । [फा. सं. वी. 12017/23/2002-पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव

CORRIGENDUM New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh , Uttar Pradesh .

S.O. 11. In para 2 of the notification No. V. 12017/23/2002 -PMS dated 23-12-2002 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made:

For: S. Nos. 55 and 56 respectively Read: S. No. 57

Read 2 Col. 1 of Table

For: S. No. 56

Read : S. No. 58 The other contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V. 12017/22/ 96 - PMS (Pt - II) ] A. K. SINGH , Under Secy. शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय:- नेशनल बोर्ड ऑफ इक्जामिनेशन की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 13.- उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 21-1-2002 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएंगी:

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1

Para 2 Line : 1

For: S.No. 56 Read : S. No. 58

Read 2 Col. 1 of Table For : S. No. 57

Read: S. No. 59

The other contents remain unchanged .

[F. No. V. 12017 /23 /2002 -PMS ] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय :-बी.आर. अम्बेडकर विश्वविद्यालय, आगरा की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 12.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 20-6-2002 की अधिसूचना सं . वी. 12017/ 22 /96 - पी एम एस ( भाग- II ) तथा दिनांक 14-2-2003 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12017/ 21/95- पी एम एस (खण्ड- I ) के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएंगी:

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1 क्रमशः क्रम सं. 55 और 56 : के लिए क्रम सं. 57 : पढ़ें ।

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं. 56 : के लिए क्रम सं. 58: पढ़ें । अन्यविषय - वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[फा. सं . वी . 12017/22/96- पी एम एस ( भाग II ) ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव क्रम सं. 54: के लिए

क्रम सं. 56 : पढ़ें ।

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं. 55 : के लिए

क्रमसं. 57: पढ़ें ।

अन्य विषय - वस्तु अपरिवर्तित रहेगी । [फा. सं. वी. 12018/36/2001- पी एम एस ]

ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of Naional Board ofExamination

S.O. 13. In para 2 of the notification No. V. 12018/36/2001 : -PMS dated 21-1-2002 on the ðubject mentioned above , the following corrections maybe made : Para 2 Line : 1

For: S. No. 54 Read: S. No. 56

Read 2 Col. 1 of Table

For: S. No. 55 Read : S. No. 57 The other contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V. 12018/36/2001 - PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

9 भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

क्रम सं. 53 : के लिए

क्रमसं. 55 : पढ़ें ।

विषय:-चौ. चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय, मेरठ की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

अन्यविषय- वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[फा. सं. वी. - 12018/ 3/2001- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह , अवर सचिव का. आ. 14.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 8-10-2001 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12018 / 18/ 2001- पी एम एस के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएंगी:

CORRIGENDUM

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1

New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 क्रम सं. 53 : के लिए

क्रमसं. 55: पढ़ें ।

Subject:-Recognition ofdental qualification of Dr. R.M.L. Avadh University, Faizabad.

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं. 54 : के लिए

S.O. 15. In para 2 of the notification No. V-12017/3/2001 -PMS dated 18-6-2001 and V- 12018/ 13/2002 dated 11-12-2002 on the subject mentioned above , the following corrections may be made: Para 2 Line : 1

क्रम सं. 56: पढ़ । अन्यविषय- वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी । [फा. सं . वी. 12018/18/2001- पी एम एस ] ए०के० सिंह, अवर सचिव

For: S. No. 52 Read: S. No. 54

Read 2 Col. 1 of Table

CORRIGENDUM NewDelhi, the 15th December, 2004

Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of Ch. Charan Singh University, Meerut .

For: S. No. 53 Read: S. No. 55 Theother contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V. - 12018/3/2001 -PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

S.O. 14. In para 2 of the notification No. V. 12018 / 18 /2001 -PMS dated 8-10-2001 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made:

शुद्धिपत्र

Para 2 Line: 1

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर , 2004

For: S.No. 53 Read : S. No. 55

विषय:-भारतीय विद्यापीठ ( डीम्ड विश्वविद्यालय ) , पुणे की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 16.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 1-11-2000 कीअधिसूचना सं . वी. - 12017/ 18 / 2000- पी एम एस के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शद्धियां की जाएंगी:

पैरा 2 पंक्ति : 1

क्रम सं. 50 : के लिए

Read 2 Col. 1 of Table For: S. No. 54 Read: S. No. 56 The other contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V. 12018/ 18/2001 -PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

क्रमसं. 53: पढ़ें ।

शुद्धिपत्र

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

क्रम सं. 51 : के लिए

विषय:-डॉ० आर० एम ० एल० अवध विश्वविद्यालय, फैजाबाद की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

क्रम सं. 53: पढ़ें ।

अन्यविषय- वस्तु अपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[फा. सं. वी. -12018/18/2000- पी एम एस ]

ए०के० सिंह, अवर सचिव का. आ. 15.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 18-6-2001 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12017/ 3/2000- पी एम एस , और दिनांक 11-12-2002 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12018/3/2002- पी एम एस, के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शद्धियां की जाएंगी:

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1 क्रम सं. 52 : के लिए क्रम सं. 54 : पढ़ें ।

Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed University) , Pune .

3770 G1/04-2 10

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

S.O. 16. In para 2 of the notification No. V. - 12017/18/2000 - PMS dated 1-11-2000 on the Subject mentioned above , the following corrections may be made :

Para 2 Line : 1

For : S. No. 50

Read : S. No. 53 Read 2 Col. 1 of Table For: S. No. 51

Read : S. No. 54 The other contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V. - 12018/ 18 /2000 -PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

शुद्धिपत्र नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय:- बाबा फरीद यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हैल्थ साइंसेज, फरीदकोट की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 17.- उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 25-8-2000 की अधिसूचना सं. वी.- 12018 / 13/2000- पी एम एस , दिनांक 28-12-2001 की अधिसूचना सं. वी . 12018/31/2001 , दिनांक 21-1-2002 की अधिसूचना संख्या वी. -12018/37/2001; दिनांक 18-2-2003 की अधिसूचना सं. 12018 /1 /2002- पी एमएस, दिनांक 16-9-2003 की अधिसूचना सं. बी.-12018/26/2002 - पी एम एस और दिनांक 30-9-2004 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12017/18/95-पी एम एस के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएगीः

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1

क्रम सं. 50 : के लिए

क्रम सं. 52: पढ़ें

तालिका 'का पैरा 2 कालम 1 क्रम सं. 51 : के लिए

क्रमसं. 53: पढ़ें अन्यविषय- वस्तु अपरिवर्तित रहेगी । [फा. सं. वी. -12018/ 13/2000- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of Baba Farid University, of Health Sciences , Faridkot .

S.O. 17. In para 2 of the notification No. V.- 12018/ 13/ 2002-PMS dated 25-8-2002 , V- 12018/31 /2001 dated 28-12-2001 , V - 12018/37/ 2001 dated 21-1-2002, V- 12018/1/ 2002- PMS dated 18-2-2003 , V - 12018 /26/2002- PMS dated 16-9-2003 , and V- 12017/ 18/95 -PMS dated 30-9-2004 on the subject above , the following corrections may be made :

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] Para 2 Line : 1 For: S. No. 50 Read S. No. 52 Read 2 Col. 1 of Table For: S. No. 51

[F. No. V- 12018/ 13/ 2000- PMS ] A. K. SINGH , Under Secy.

Read: S. No. 53 The other contents remain unchanged. शद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2004

विषय:-हिमाचल प्रदेश विश्वविद्यालय , शिमला की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 18.- उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 10 अगस्त, 2000 की अधिसूचना सं. वी. 12017/47/93- पी एम एस, दिनांक 8-3-2001 की अधिसूचना सं . वी. 12017/12/94- पी एम एस, दिनांक 30-10-2003 की अधिसूचना संख्या वी. 12017/27 - ए/97 पी एम एस और दिनांक21-7-2004 की अधिसूचना सं . 12017/15/98 - पी एम.एस, के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएगीः

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1 क्रम सं. 49 : के लिए क्रम सं. 51 : पढ़ें तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1 क्रम सं. 50 : के लिए क्रम सं. 52: पढ़ें

अन्यविषय- वस्तु अपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[फा. सं. वी -12017/47/93- पी एम एस ] ए ० के ० सिंह , अवर सचिव

CORRIGENDUM New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 Subject :-Recognition of dental qualification of Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla

S.O. 18.- In para 2 of the notification No. V- 12017/47/93 - PMSdated 10th August , 2000 , No. V- 12017/ 12/94- PMS dated 8-3-2001 , No. V- 12017 / 27 - A/97 - PMS dated 30-10-2003 and No. V- 12017/ 15/98 - PMS dated 21-7- 2004 on the subject mentioned above , the following corrections may be made:

Para 2 Line : 1 For: S. No. 49 Read S. No. 51 Read 2 Col. 1 of Table

For: S. No. 50

Read : S. No. 52

The other contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V- 12017/ 47/93 -PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय:-श्री रामचन्द्र मेडिकल कालेज एंड रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट ( डीम्ड विश्वविद्यालय ) चेन्नई की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 19.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 22 नवम्बर, 1999 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां की जाएंगी:

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1

क्रम सं. 48 : के लिए

क्रमसं. 50: पढ़ें

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं. 49 : के लिए क्रम सं. 51 : पढ़ें अन्यविषय- वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी । [फा. सं. वी-12018/6/99- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव

CORRIGENDUM New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 Subject : Recognition of dental qualification of Shri Ramchandra Medical College & Research Institute(Deemed University) Chennai .

S.O. 19. In para 2 of the notification of the even number dated 22nd November, 1999 on the subject mentioned above , the following corrections may be made Para 2 Line : 1

For : S. No. 48 Read : S. No. 50 Read 2 Col. 1 of Table For : S. No. 49 Read : S. No. 51 The other contents remain unchanged.

[F. No. V- 12018/ 6/99 -PMS ] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

शुद्धिपत्र नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय:- एन टी आर यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हैल्थ सांइसेज , विजयवाड़ा आन्ध्र प्रदेश की डेंटल अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना । का. आ. 20.-उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 2 नवम्बर, 1999 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के पैरा 2 में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां कीजाएगीः

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1

क्रम सं. 47 : के लिए क्रम सं. 49: पढ़ें ।

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम

क्रम सं. 48 : के लिए

क्रम सं. 50: पढ़ें । अन्यविषय - वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[फा. सं. वी. 12018/4/96- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 Subject:-Recognition of dental qualification of NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh .

S.O. 20. In para 2 of the notification of the evennumber dated 2nd November, 1999 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made:

Para 2 Line : 1 For: S. No. 47 Read : S. No. 49

Para 2 Col. 1 of Table For: S. No. 48 Read : S. No. 50

The other contents remain unchanged. [F. No. V. 12018/4/96-PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर, 2004

विषय :-राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय (आर.जी.यू.ओ.एच.एस. ) बैंगलोर की दंत चिकित्सा अर्हता को मान्यता प्रदान करना ।

का. आ. 21.- उपर्युक्त विषय पर दिनांक 26-7-99 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना तथा दिनांक 9-3-2000 की वी. 12018/3/2000 - पी एम एस , दिनांक 6-4-2000 की वी.12018/4/2000- पी एम एस , दिनांक 27-9-2000 की वी. 12018/11 /2000- पी एम एस, दिनांक 27-7-2000 की वी. 1018/9/2000- पी एम एस, दिनांक 27-7-2000 की वी. 12018/ 10/2000- पी एम एस, दिनांक 15-9-2000 की वी. 12018/14/2000- पी एम एस, दिनांक 16-10-2000 की वी. 12018/16/2000-ी एम एस, दिनांक 22-12-2000-की वी. 12018/ 17/ 2000- पी एम एस, दिर्नाक 11-6-2001 की वी. 12018/5/2001- पी एम एस, दिनांक 11-6-2001 तथा - 12-2001 कीवी. 12018/6/ 2001 - पी एम एस , दिनांक 2001 तथा 30-12-2001 की वी. 12018/14/ 2001-पी एम एस, दिनांक 24-12-2001 की वी. 12018/ 24/2001- पी. एम. एस. दिनांक 12

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

30-12-2002 & 18-1-2004 , V. 12018/ 1 / 2002 -PMS dated 22-1-2003, V. 12017/30/96- PMS (Vol. VI), dated 23-1-2003 ,V. 12018/24/2002 -PMS dated 27-1-2003 & 31-10-2003 , V. 12017/ 8/98-PMS dated 21-7-2004 on the subject mentioned above, the following corrections may be made:

Para 2 Line : 1 For: S. No. 46 Read : S. No. 48 Para 2 Col. 1 of Table For: S. No. 47 Read: S. No. 49

Theother contents remain unchanged.

[F. No. V. 12018/ 2/ 99 - PMS ] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy. 24-12-2001 की वी. 12018/ 25/ 2001- पी एम एस, दिनांक 14-1-2002 की वी . 12018/33/ 2001 - पी एम एस, 17-1-2002 की वी. 12018/32/2001- पी एम एस, दिनांक 13-3-2002 की वी. 12017/4/94- पी एम एस, दिनांक 1-4-2002 की वी. 12018/34/2001- पी एम एस, दिनांक2-7-2002 की वी.12018/22/ 2001 - पी एम एस, दिनांक 2-7-2002 की वी. 12018/8 /2002- पी एम एस, दिनांक 9-8-2002 की वी. 12018/30/2001 - पी एम एस, दिनांक 9-8-2002 कीवी. 12018/30/2001- पी एम एस, दिनांक 13-8-2002 की वी. 12018/10/2001- पी एम एस, दिनांक 30-12-2002 तथा 18-1-2004 कीवी. 12018/28 /2002- पी एम एस, दिनांक 22-1-2003 की वी. 12018 / 1/2002- पी एम एस, दिनांक 23-1-2003 की वी. 12017/30/96- पी एम एस, ( खण्ड vi ), दिनांक 27-1-2003 तथा 31-10-2003 की वी. 12018/24/2002- पी एम एस, दिनांक 21-7- 2004 की वी. 12017/8/98- पी एम एस, पैरा में निम्नलिखित शुद्धियां कीजाएं:

इस्पात मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2004

पैरा 2 पंक्ति: 1 क्रम सं. 46 के स्थान पर क्रम सं. 48: पढ़ें ।

तालिका का पैरा 2 कालम 1

क्रम सं . 47 के स्थान पर क्रम मं. 49 : पढ़ें । अन्य विषय - वस्तुअपरिवर्तित रहेगी ।

[फा. सं. वी. 12018/2/99-पी . एम. एस. ] ए० के० सिंह, अवर सचिव

CORRIGENDUM

का. आ. 22.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, सरकारी स्थान (अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री विजय कुमार सिन्हा, मुख्य कार्मिक प्रबंधक ( औद्योगिक संबंध और कल्याण ) , जो भारत सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के समतुल्य पंक्तिके अधिकारी हैं, रिसर्च एण्ड डेवलपमेंट सेंटर फार आइरन एण्ड स्टील, स्टील अथॉरिटी ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड, रांची झारखंड के या पट्टे पर लिए गए सरकारी स्थान की बाबत अपने स्थानीय सीमाओं की अधिकारिता के अन्तर्गत उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है, जो प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और उक्त अधिनियम के द्वारा या उसके अधीन सम्पदा अधिकारी पर अधिरोपित कर्तव्यों का पालन करेंगे ।

[फा. सं. 19( 4)/2004-सेल-सी. आई.पी. ] New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 Subject : Recognition of dental qualification of Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , ( RIGUOHS ) , Bangalore.

लेखन एन. ठक्कर, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF STEEL

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2004

S.O. 22. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises ( Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Vijay Kumar Sinha, Chief PersonnelManager (Indian Relations and Welfare) , being an officer equivalent to the rank of a Gazetted Officer of Government, to be Estate Officer for the purposes of the said Act , who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perfrom the duties imposed, on an Estate Officer by or underthe said Act, within the local limits of his jurisdiction in respect of the public premises belonging to or taken on lease by the Research and Development Centre for Iron Steel, Steel Authority of India Limited, Ranchi , Jharkhand.

[F. No. 19(4)2004/S -CIP] 5.O. 21. In para 2 of the notification of the even number dated 10-7-99 and V. 12018/3/ 2000 - PMS dated 9-3-2000.1218/4/2000 - PMS dated 6-4-2000 , V. 12018/ 11/ 2000 -PMS dated 27-7-2000 , V. 12018/ 9/ 2000 - PMS dated 27-7-2000 , V. 12018 / 10 /2000-PMS dated 27-7-2000, V. 12018/ 14/2000 - PMS dated 15-9-2000 , V. 12018/ 16/2000 - PMS dated 16-10-2000 , V. 12018/ 17/2000 - PMS dated 22-12-2000 , V. 12018/5/2001-PMS dated 11-6-2001 , V. 12018/ 6/2001 -PMS dated 11-6-2001 & 24-12-2001 , V. 12018/ 14/2001 -PMS dated 8-8-2001 & 30-12-2001 , V. 12018/24/2001 - PMS dated 24-12-2001 , V. 12018/ 25 /2001 - PMS dated 24-12-2001 , V. 12018/33/2001 - PMS dated 14-1-2002 , V. 12018/ 32/2001- PMS dated 17-1-2002 , V. 12018 /29/ 2001 - PMS dated 23-1-2002 , V. 12018/4/2000 - PMS dated 13-3-2202 , V. 12017/ 4194- PMS dated 13-3-2002, V. 12018/ 34/2001 - PMS dated 1-4-2002, V. 1218 /22/2001 - PMS dated 2-7-2002, V. 12018/8/ 2002- PMS dated 2-7-2002, V. 12018/30/2001 - PMS dated 9-8-2002 , V. 12108/30/2001 - PMS dated 9-8-2002 , V. 12018/ 10/2001 -PMS dated 13-8-2002 , V. 12018/28/2002 -PMS dated

LEKHAN N. THAKKAR, Under Secy.

13 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 23.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फॉर- ब्रो इंजीनियरस, 10 अशोक इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, प्लाट सं. 6 , उद्योग नगर, फ्लाईओवर के निकट , गोरेगांव, ( वेस्ट मुंबई -400062 ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " ए पी 100 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( कप फिलर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रेपिड पैक" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 188 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( कप फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । इसका उपयोग मंजन, टेलकम पाउडर, चाय, काफी, चूर्ण, चीनी, चावल, नमक, कणी, डिटर्जेंट, बीज, कृषि उत्पादों इत्यादि जैसे मुक्त प्रवाह वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 15-30 पैकेट प्रति मिनट भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सील की जायेगी ।

FOR-BRO

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 50 ग्रा. से 2 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 03 )/2003 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 14

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 23. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic filling machine ( Cup Filler) of " DV -3 " series with brand name " Rapid Pack" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . For - Bro Engineers , 10 , Ashok Industrial Estate, Plot No. 6 , Udyog Nagar, Near Flyover , Goregaon (West), Mumbai-400 062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 2004 / 188 ;

The said Model ( sce the Figure given below) and automatic filling machine ( Cup Filler) and its maximum Capacity is 2 kg. and minimum capacity of 50g. It is used for filling the free flowing products like toothpowder, talcum powder, tea , coffee powder, sugar , rice , salt , granuales , detergents , seeds , agricultural products etc. It fills 15-30 packets per minute . The instrument operates on 440V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fradulent practices.

Figure

FOR-BRO

Further, in exercise of the powers , conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 50gto 2kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No WM - 21 ( 03 )/2003 ]

PA . KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौय 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 24.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फॉर - ब्रो इंजीनियर्स, 10 अशोक इडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, प्लाट सं. 6 , उद्योग नगर , फ्लाईओवर के निकट, गोरेगांव, ( वेस्ट मुंबई -400062 ) द्वारा विनिर्मित " ए पी 100 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( औगर फिलर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रेपिड पैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2004/ 189 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त जॉडल ( नीचे दी गई ) एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( औगर फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । इसका उपयोग मंजन, टेलकम पाउडर, काफी चूर्ण , मसाले , आटा , कीट नाशक चूर्ण इत्यादि जैसे मुक्त बहाव वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 10-20 पैकेट प्रति मिनट भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने को रोकने के लिए भी सील की जायेगी ।

FOR BRO

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 10 ग्रा. से 5 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 03 )/2003 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 16

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )) New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 24. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Governnient hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic filling machine ( Auger Filler ) of " AP - 100 " series with brand name " Rapid Pack" ( herein referred to as the said Model ), manufacturedby M/ s For - Bro Engineers , 10 , Ashok Industrial Estate , Plot No. 6 , Udyog Nagar , Ncar Flyover, Goregaon (West ) , Mumbai - 400 062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 2004/ 189 ;

The said Model (see the Figure given below ) an automatic filling machine (Auger Filler) and its maximum capacity is 2kg and minimum capacity of 100g . It is used for filling the free flowing products like toothpowder , talcum powder, coffee powder, ground spices , atta , pesticide powder etc. It fills 10-20 packets per minute. The instruments operates on 440V, 50 Hz. alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

FOR-BRO

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 10g . to 5kg . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

(F. No WM- 21 ( 03 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 17

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 25. -केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फॉर- ब्रो इंजीनियरस्, 10 अशोक इण्डस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, प्लाट सं. 6 , उद्योग नगर, फ्लाईओवर के निकट, गोरेगांव, ( वेस्ट) मुंबई-400 062 द्वारा विनिर्मित " ए एल सी -100" श्रृंखला के स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( औगर फिलर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रेपिड पैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 190 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई ) एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन ( औगर फिलर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा . है । इसका उपयोग मंजन, टेलकम पाउडर, काफी, चूर्ण , मसाले , आटा, कीट नाशक चूर्ण इत्यादि जैसे मुक्त बहाव वाले उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 10-20 पैकेट प्रति मिनट भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने को रोकने के लिए भी सील की जायेगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 10 ग्रा. से 5 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में है ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 03)/2003 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 18

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 25. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in confornity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic filling machine (Auger Filler ) of " ALC - 100 " series with brand name " Rapid Pack" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s For - Bro Engineers , 10 , Ashok Industrial Estate, Plot No. 6 , Udyog Nagar , Near Flyover, Goregaon (West) , Mumbai - 400 062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 2004 / 190;

The said Model ( Sce the Figure given below) an automatic filling machine (Auger Filler ) and its maximum capacity is 2kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . It is used for filling the free flowing products like toothpowder, talcum powder, coffec powder, ground spices, atta , pesticide powder etc. It fills 10-20 packets per minute The instruments operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shail also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 10gto 5kg. manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

IF No WM - 21 ( 03 )/2003 ]

P. A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 19 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ० 26.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओटोपैक मशीन्स प्रा. लि. , 101- सी, पूनम चैम्बर्स, डा० ए. बी. रोड, वर्ली , मुंबई -400018 द्वारा विनिर्मित " बी एफ -6 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचन भरण मशीन ( कप फिलर प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओटोपैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004 / 135 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । इसका उपयोग मुक्त बहाव वाले चूर्ण , कणी इत्यादि को आदानों/पाउचों में भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 2000 आदान/पाउच प्रति घंटा भरती है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने को रोकने के लिए भी सील की जायेगी ।

ये

CUP FILLER - MODEL VF6 . SERIES.

AUTOPACK

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 56) /2000]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 20

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11, 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 26. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( scc the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained usc and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating Automatic FillingMachine ( Cup Filler ) of " VF -6 " series with brand name " AUTOPACK " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Autopack Machines Pvt . Ltd. , 101 -C , Poonam Chambers , Dr. A.B. Road , Worh , Mumbai -400 018 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2004/ 135;

The said model is an automatic filling machine with a maximum capacity of 2kg. It is used for filling the free flowing powders , granules , etc in containers /pouches . It fills 2000 fills per hour. The instrument operates on 230- Volts and 50Hertz alternale current power supply.

In additionto scaling stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

CUP FILLER- MODEL VF6. SERIES.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with capacity up to 2kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

IF No. WM - 21 ( 56) /20001

PA KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 21

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

LUTE SELF DO का० आ ० 27.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा वाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओटोपैक मशीन्स् प्रा . लि. , 101- सी, पूनम चैम्बर्स, डा. ए. बी. रोड, वर्ली, मुंबई-400018 द्वारा विनिर्मित " डब्ल्यू एफ " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक भरण मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओटोपैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 136 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसका उपयोग मुक्त बहाव वाले चूर्ण, चावल, दाल गिरी इत्यादि को भार आधार पर में भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 2000 भरण प्रति घंटा भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने को रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जायेगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 5 ग्रा. से 10 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में हैं ।

फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 56 ) / 2000 ] 31

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 22

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 27. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating Automatic Filling Machine of " WF " series with brand name " AUTOPACK" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Autopack Machines Pvt . Ltd. , 101 - C, Poonam Chambers , Dr. A. B. Road , Worli , Mumbai -400 018 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/ 136 ;

The said model is an automatic filling machine with a minimum capacity of 10 kg . It is used for filling the free flowing powders , rice , pulses, nuts etc. on weight basis . It fills 2000 fills per hour. The instrument operates on 230- Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to scaling stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

AUTOPACK

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 56 )/2000 }

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 23 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का० आ ० 28.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओटोपैक मशीनस् प्रा. लि. , 101 - सी, पूनम चैम्बर्स, डा. ए. बी. रोड, वर्ली, मुंबई-400018 द्वारा विनिर्मित " पो डी -30 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचन भरण मशीन ( वेट मट्रीक प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओटो पैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 / 137 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा . है । इसका उपयोग चूर्ण , खाद्य, फरमाश्यूटिकल और कीट नाशकों के लिए कणी इत्यादि को भार आधार पर भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 2500 भरण प्रति घंटा भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्यिग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने को रोकने के लिए भी सील की जायेगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए वह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 5 ग्राम से 1 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 56) /2000]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 24

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( 1) ) New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 28. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating Automatic Filling Machine ( Weighmetric) of " PD - 30 " series with brand name " AUTOPACK " ( herein referredto as the said Model), manufacturedby M / s . Autopack Machines Pvt Ltd. , 101 - C , Poonam Chambers , Dr. A.B. Road . Worli, Mumbai -400 018 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /2004/137;

The said model is an automatic filling machine with a minimum capacity of 1kg It is used for filling the powders , granular materials for food pharmaceuticals and presticides etc. It fills 2500 fills per hour. The instrument operates on 230 - Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

[ F. No WM - 21 ( 56 ) /2000 ]

PA . KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 25 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का० आ० 29.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

उक्त मॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसका उपयोग क्रीम, पेंट, पापस , आसंजक, लोशन, मलहम, गौंद इत्यादि भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 2000 आदान प्रति घंटा भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने को लिए भी सीलबन्द की जायेगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. तक की रेंज में हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 56 )/2000]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3770 GI/041 26

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 29. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of self indicating Automatic Filling Machine of " CF - 30 " series with brand name " AUTOPACK " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Autopack Machines Pvt . Ltd. , 101 - C , Poonam Chambers , Dr A.B Road , Worli , Mumbai -400 018 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/134;

The said Model is an automatic filling machine with a maximum capacity of 5kg . It is used for filling the creams , paints , emulsions, adhesives , lotion, balms , gums, etc. It fills 2000 containers per hour. The instrument operates on 230 -Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

[F No WM - 21 ( 56)/ 2000 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 27

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का० आ० 30.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेंवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओटोपैक मशीन्स प्रा. लि. , 101- सी , पूनम चैम्बर्स, डा. ए. बी. रोड, वर्ली, मुंबई -400018 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एल एफ " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक अंकक सूचन भरण मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओटोपैक" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 138 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक स्वचालित भरण मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5000 मि. ली. है । इसका उपयोग मुक्त बहाव और विसकस द्रव बोतल /पाउच में भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह 20 भरण प्रति मिनट भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन खोले जाने को रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जायेगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि 'उक्त मॉडल का अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , से विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 5000 मि. लीटर तक की रेंज में हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 56)/2000]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 28

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 30. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976-( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating Automatic Filling Machine of " LF " series with brand name " AUTOPACK " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Autopack Machines Pvt Ltd. , 101 - C, Poonam Chambers , Dr. A.B. Road , Worli , Mumbai -400 018 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/ 138;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is an automatic filling machine with a minimum capacity of 5000ml . It is used for filling the free flowing and viscous liquids in bottles/pouches . It fills 20 fills per minute . The instrument operates on 230 -Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

AUTOPECK

F. No. WM - 21 ( 56 )/ 2000 )

PA. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 29

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ ० 31.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रूद्र सिस्टम, सर्वे सं. 121 /पी , सिलवासा इन्डस्ट्रीज कोओपरेटिव सोसायटी, एमिल, सिलवास द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " आर ए एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रूद्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/ 281 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार लोड का सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबल टॉप प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Rudra

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक कीरेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2×10%, या 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 120)/2004]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 30

[PART II SEC. 3 ( i ) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 31. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Acı , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 19 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate servics under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " RAS " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class- II) and with brand name " RUDRA " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Rudra System , Survey No. 121 /P, Silvass Industrial Cooperative Society, Arnil , Silvassa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/281 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Rudn

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- section (12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, wherek being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 120)/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 31

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौप 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का ०आ ० 32.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रूद्र सिस्टम सर्वे सं . 121 /पी, सिलवासा इन्डस्ट्रीज कोओपरेटिव सोसायटी, एमिल , सिलवास द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " आर ए एम " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रूद्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 /282 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देंखे ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल से आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 350 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यषकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " माने के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2× 10 या 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 120 )/2004 ]

पी ० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 32

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 32. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " RAM " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "RUDRA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Rudra System Survey No 121 /P, Silvass Industrial Cooperative Society, Amil , Silvassa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/282 .

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 350g. and minimum capacity of 200 mg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

1000

In addition to scaling the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same serics with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50.000 for ` e` value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F No WM - 21 ( 120)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 33 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ० 33.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रूद्र सिस्टम सर्वे सं. 121 /पी , सिलवासा इन्डस्ट्रीज कोओपरेटिव सोसायटी , एमिल , सिलवास द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आर ए एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रूद्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/283 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटोप प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2×10 या 5× 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 120)/2004 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3770 G1 / 04 34

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

PART 11-SEC 3 ( u )]

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 33. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained usc and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " RAS " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " RUDRA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Rudra System, Survey No 121 /P, Silvass Industrial Cooperative Society, Amil , Silvassa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/283 ,

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( c) is 5g It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

0000

In addition to scaling the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximunı capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 120)/2004 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 35 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौय 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ० 34.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रूद्र सिस्टम सर्वे सं. 121 /पी, सिलवासा इन्डस्ट्रीज कोओपरेटिव सोसायटी , एमिल, सिलवास द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-- III ) वाले " आर ए पी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रूद्र " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 284 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 ×10 , 2×10 या 5 × 10 %, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (120)/2004] पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 36

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART I -SEC. 3 ( ii )) New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 34. Whcreas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, thereforc , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of "RAP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " RUDRA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Rudra System, Survey No 121 /P, Silvass Industrial Cooperative Society, Amil , Silvassa and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /2004/ 284 .

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval (c) is 200g. 11 has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg. with verification scale interval (11) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 * or 5x10k. where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No WM - 21 ( 120)/2004 ]

PA. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 37 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौप 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ ० 35.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माय मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रूद्र सिस्टम सर्वे सं. 121 /पी, सिलवासा इन्डस्ट्रीज कोओपरेटिव सोसायटी , एमिल , सिलवास द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " आर ए पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " रूद्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 285 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

RUORA

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सौलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक कीअधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 120 )/2004 ]

पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 38

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ü) ] New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 35. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of " RAP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " RUDRA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s Rudra System . Survey No. 121 /P, Silvass Industrial Cooperative Society, Arnil , Silvassa and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 2004 / 285,

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 5kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

ROORAY

In addition to scaling the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with 'e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, where k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 120)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 39 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ ० 36.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बी आर इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, प्लाट सं . 34/ए, इलैक्ट्रोनिक कांप्लेक्स, कुशइगुडा, हैदराबाद -500 062 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " वी आर- जे पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वी आर स्केल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 156 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (टेबल टोप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3 कि. प्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 मि. ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया lobus d और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2× 10* या 5 × 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 123 ) /2003 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 40

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004

S.O. 36. Whcreas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " VR - JP " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " VR - SCALES" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s VR Electronics . Plat No. 34 /A , Electronics Complex. Kushaiguda , Hyderabad - 500062 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2004/156;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - autornatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 3kg. and minimum capacity of 5g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100mg It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1mg . to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured

[F. No. WM-21 ( 123 )/ 2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 41 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11, 1926

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ० 37.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वी आर इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, प्लाट सं. 34/ए, इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स कांप्लेक्स, कुशइगुडा, हैदराबाद -500 062 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " वी आर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेवल टोप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वी आर स्केल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/157 समनुदेशित किया गयाहै , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा। स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 123 ) /2003 ]

पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3770 G1/ 04ーの 42

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/ PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 37. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of " VR- TB " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - 111 ) and with brand name " VR - SCALES" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . VR Electronics , Plot No 34 / A, Electronic Complex, Kushaiguda , Hyderabad -500 062 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/ 157 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scalc interval ( c) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mgto 2g and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for 'e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the sarme principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured

[ F. No WM - 21 ( 123 )/2003 ]

PA . KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 43 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का०आ ० 38.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वी आर इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, प्लाट सं. 34/ए, इलैक्ट्रोनिक कांप्लेक्स, कुशइगुडा, हैदराबाद-500 062 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " वी आर पी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वी आर स्केल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन विह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/158 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 75 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5× 10 %, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 123) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 44

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 38. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (sce the figure given below) , 15 in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under vaned conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " VR - PP " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " VR - SCALES " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s VR Electronics , Plot No. 34/A, Electronic Complex, Kushaiguda , Hyderabad - 500-062 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/ 158;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 75kg and minimum capacity of 250g . The verification scale interval ( c) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 300kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negauve whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 123 )/2003 )

PA KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 45 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौप 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004

का.आ. 39.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्टमें वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात को संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वो आर इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, प्लाट सं. 34 /ए, इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स कांप्लेक्स, कुशइगुडा, हैदराबाद-500062 , आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " वी आर- पो टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वी आर स्केल्त " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 159 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसको अधिकतम क्षमता 75 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा। स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलवन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।हैं ।

[फा० . सं . डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 123) /2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 46

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004

S.O. 39. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( sce the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Acı , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rulcs . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the saíd Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platfrom type ) with digital indication of " VR - PT " serics of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " VR - SCALES" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . VR Electronics , Plot No. 34 /A , Electronics Complex, Kushaiguda , Hyderabad - 500 062, Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004 / 159 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platfrom typc) with a maximum capacity of 75kg and minimum capacity of 200g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10g It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result The instruments operates on 230 Volts . and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

In additionto sealing the stamping plate scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrumenis of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and up to 300kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more with ' e ' valuc of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* or 5x10* , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured

IF No. WM - 21 ( 123)/2003 )

P. A KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 47

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम एवं प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2004

का०आ० 40.- जबकि केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि जोरहाट और गोलाघाट शहर, जिला जोरहाट एवं गोलाघाट को प्राकृतिक गैस आपूर्ति के लिये लाकुवा से गोलाघाट तक आसाम गैस कम्पनी लिमिटेड, दुलियाजान द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछायी जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये इसके साथ उपबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित करती है । उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये आपत्ति और सुझाव सक्षम अधिकारी नामतः जिला उपायुक्त, शिवसागर, असम को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकता है ।

और ऐसी आपत्ति और सुझाव देने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी बताएगा कि क्या वह अपनी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से चाहता है अथवा किसी विधिव्यवसायी के माध्यम से ।

अनुसूची

सर्कल: सोनारी

जिला: शिवसागर

राज्य: असम

दाग नं.

पट्टानं.

क्रम गांव का नाम नं.

क्षेत्रफल कट्टा

लुसा 1 2

मौजा 3

बीघा 6

529

2 सिलाकुटी

01. रामूगांव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

530

मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

531

मियादीपट्टानं. 203

532

मियादी पट्टा नं. 282

537

मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

520

मियादी पट्टा नं. 97

538

मियादीपट्टा नं . 206

11/2

539

मियादी पट्टा नं. 111

799

मियादी पट्टा नं. 162

853

मियादी पट्टा नं. 134

671

मियादी पट्टा नं. 227

854

मियादी पट्टा नं. 203

4/2

573

मियादी पट्टा नं. 157

857

मियादीपट्टा नं. 247

861

मियादी पट्टा नं. 126

862

मियादी पट्टा नं. 106

863

मियादी पट्टा नं . 81

864

मियादी पट्टा नं. 237

4 48

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

866 01. रामूगांव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 67

सिलाकुटी

870

मियादी पट्टानं. 243

869

मियादी पट्टा नं . 237

889

मियादी पट्टा नं. 106

893

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

894

मियादी पट्टा नं . 68

895

मियादीपट्टा नं. 243

896

मियादीपट्टा नं. 127

897

मियादीपट्टा नं. 243

864

मियादी पट्टा नं. 175

867

मियादीपट्टा नं. 237

892

मियादी पट्टा नं. 205

कुल क्षेत्रफल

530

धोपाबार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 227 02. पोहसुंगी ध्युधायी

515

मियादी पट्टा नं. 295

517

मियादीपट्टा नं. 32

514

मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

511

मियादी पट्टा नं. 214

510

मियादीपट्टा नं. 31

509

मियादी पट्टा नं. 316

504

मियादी पट्टा नं . 157

503

मियादी पट्टा नं. 338

सरकार

382

सरकार

383

734

मियादी पट्टा नं .

529

मियादी पट्टा नं. 295

531

मियादी पट्टा नं. 227

516

मियादी पट्टा नं. 242

465

मियादी पट्टा नं. 273

579

मियादी पट्टा नं. 141

741

मियादीपट्टा नं. 295

739

मियादी पट्टा नं. 367

736

मियादीपट्टा नं. 205

735

मियादी पट्टा नं. 326

426

मियादी पट्टा नं. 4

427

मियादी पट्टा नं. 141

282

मियादी पट्टा नं. 135

582

मियादी पट्टा नं. 229

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

8 0

7 0

9 0

15 0

11 0

6 0

9 0

5 6

5 0

15 0

2 0

13 0

15 0

7 0

10 0

11 0

17 0

3 0

6 0

7 0

18 0

17 0

15 0

3 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

496 02.पोहसुंगी घ्युधायी

धोपाबार जारी

8 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 343

494

मियादी पट्टा नं. 44

303 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 83

304

सरकार

502

7 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 155

500

9 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 117

587

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 168

586 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 388

सरकार

501

590

1 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 12

428 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 242

429 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 192

431 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

525 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 227

526 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 25

523

मियादी पट्टा नं. 188

523 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 188

521

मियादी पट्टा नं. 225

520

मियादी पट्टा नं . 355

418

5 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 403

420 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 424

421 0

मियादीपट्टा नं . 8

422

18 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 132

424

15 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 132

431 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

466

मियादी पट्टा नं. 40

498 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 334

499 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

648

1 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 160

299

मियादी पट्टा नं. 54

301 0

मियांदीपट्टा नं. 200

302 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 296

824

11 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 310

सरकार

622

498

5 0

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 334

497 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 378

591 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 294

3770 GI/04-7 50

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

5 1

592

धोपाबार- जारी मियादी पट्टा नं . 55

02. पोहसुंगी ध्युधायी

593

मियादी पट्टा नं. 258

604

मियादीपट्टा नं. 258

603

मियादीपट्टा नं. 294

602

मियादीपट्टा नं. 12

647

मियादीपट्टा नं. 279

581

मियादी पट्टा नं. 406

513

मियादी पट्टा नं. 188

524

मियादीपट्टा, नं. 245

425

मियादी पट्टा नं. 100

कुल क्षेत्रफल

धोपाबार

587

मियादीपट्टा नं. 135 03. लुथुरी गाँव

589

सरकार

584

एकसना

583

मियादी पट्टा नं. 95

465

मियादी पट्टा नं. 95

464

मियादी पट्टा नं. 34

448

मियादी पट्टा नं. 17

459

मियादी पट्टा नं. 58

456

मियादीपट्टा नं. 39

703

मियांदीपट्टा नं. 53

451

सरकार

454

मियादीपट्टा नं. 108

566

मियादीपट्टा नं. 135

565

एकसना

567

मियादीपट्टा नं. 135

सरकार

706

702

मियादीपट्टा नं. 53

467

मियादी पट्टा नं. 21

455

मियादीपट्टा नं. 39

सरकार

148

564

सरकार

कुलक्षेत्रफल

4. सनबासा

नाजिरा

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38 हेंडिक गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 41

मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

मियादी पट्टा नं. 114

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

2 0

9 0

18 0

2 0

4 0

17 0

18 18

13 0

17 0

6 0

2 0

10 0

7 0

19 0

3 0

11 0

17 0

19 0

10 0

5 0

0 0

4 0

16 5

7 0

5 0

7 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

180 04 सनबासा हेंडिक गाँव नाजिरा- जारी

8 7

मियादी पट्टा नं . 87

181 0

मियादी पट्टा.नं. 26

184

0 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38

190

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 65

191 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 71

192

0 3

मियादी पट्टा नं. 952

193

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 100

217

4 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 88

218 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 87

216

4 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 86

220

2 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

221 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 86

222

9 2

मियादीपट्टा नं. 110

223

2 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 28

225

13 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

341 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 73

342 0

मियादीपट्टा नं.42

343

0 0

मियादीपट्टा नं.48

344 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 120

345

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 51

346 0

मियादीपट्टानं . 87

347

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 51

348

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 59

349

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 132

350 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 50

352 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

353

0 0

मियांदी पट्टा नं. 133

354

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 111

355 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 30

सरकार

356

417 0

2 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 87

420

0 1 .

मियादीपट्टा नं. 14

427

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

428 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 52

429

0 1

मियादीपट्टा नं. 62

सरकार

439

430 0

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 52

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

5 04 सनबासा हेंडिक गाँव

440

नाजिरा-जारी मियादीपट्टा नं. 73

463

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

438

मियादीपट्टा नं. 93

465

मियादीपट्टा नं. 107

466

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

471

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

472

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

473

मियादी पट्टानं. 18

474

सरकार

478

एकसना

सरकार

477

498

सरकार

530

मियादी पट्टा नं . 83

502

मियादी पट्टा नं. 167

552

एकसना

558

एकसना

580

सरकार

584

एकसना

598

एकसना

589

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38

418

मियादी पट्टा नं. 59

503

मियादी पट्टा नं. 167

504

मियादीपट्टा नं. 28

500

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

सरकार

506

सरकार

515

516

मियादी पट्टा नं. 97

517

मियादी पट्टा नं. 97

518

मियादी पट्टा नं. 97

519

मियादी पट्टा नं. 97

520

सरकार

537

एकसना

534

एकसना

535

एकसना

544

एकसना

545

एकसना

546

एकसना

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 6

8 0

17 0

11 0

17 0

5 0

18 1

12 0

5 0

5 1

9 0

1/2 0

6 0

2 0

6 0

18 0

17 0

152 0

6 0

13 0

19 0

00000

11 0

6 53

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 04 सनबासा हेंडिक गाँव नाजिरा-जारी

549

एकसना

550

एकसना

551

एकसना

कुल क्षेत्रफल:

369 05 लिकसन गाँव

नाजिरा

19 0

5 0

19 18

मियादी पट्टा नं. 91

368 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 134

233 0

मियादी पट्टानं. 40

234 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 87

232 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 3

242 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 212

243

2 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 65

270 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 81

271 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 143

273 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 104

269 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38

276

मियादी पट्टा नं. 84

277

मियादी पट्टा नं. 147

278 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

279 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 132

280 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 38

281 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 117

282

मियादीपट्टा नं. 145

285 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 168

286

3 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 11

287

मियादी पट्टा नं. 116

288 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 168

289 0

162

मियादीपट्टा नं. 133

290 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 168

291 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 13

294 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 60

295 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

261 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 98

292 0

162

मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

293 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 79

240 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 110

284 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 99

272

मियादीपट्टा नं. 104

275 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 132

कुल क्षेत्रफल:

17 54

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

1245

नाजिरा- जारी मियादी पट्टा नं. 75

06 हुलांगकाटनी गाँव

1231

मियादी पट्टा नं. 19

1223

मियादीपट्टा नं. 203

1222

मियादीपट्टा नं. 193

1229

मियादी पट्टा नं. 12

1230

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

1232

मियादीपट्टा नं. 316

1219

मियादीपट्टा नं. 193

1220

मियादी पट्टा नं. 201

1235

मियादी पट्टा नं. 234

1236

मियादी पट्टा नं. 176

1238

मियादी पट्टा नं. 270

889

मियादी पट्टा नं. 232

888

मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

887

मियादी पट्टा नं. 302

846

मियादी पट्टा नं. 302

835

मियादी पट्टा नं. 225

839

मियादी पट्टा नं. 328

824

मियादी पट्टा नं. 91

826

मियादी पट्टा नं. 301

828

मियादीपट्टा नं.

836

मियादी पट्टा नं. 307

834

मियादीपट्टा नं. 62

854

मियादी पट्टा नं. 83

855

मियादीपट्टा नं.

सरकार

783

784

मियादी पट्टा नं. 177

782

मियादीपट्टा नं. 195

781

मियादी पट्टा नं. 269

754

मियादी पट्टा नं. 89

752

मियादीपट्टा नं. 133

757

मियादी पट्टा नं. 161

758

मियादी पट्टा नं. 236

759

मियादी पट्टा नं. 143

760

मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

793

मियादी पट्टा नं. 103

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

8 0

11 0

1 0

4 0

7 0

2 0

13 0

2 0

4 0

2 0

10 0

63 0

12 0

6 0

18 0

4 0

15 0

17 0

2 0

3 0

6 0

15 0

2 0

15 0

11 0

17 0

15 0

18 0

15 0

6 0

11 0

3 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नाजिरा-जारी

764

8 6

मियादीपट्टा नं. 195

06 हुलांगकाटनी गाँव

1237 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 336

1221

मियादी पट्टा नं. 146

1234 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 139

1233 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 153

780

एकसना

789

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 16

790

मियादी पट्टा नं. 195

791

मियादीपट्टा नं. 182

792

5 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

761

0 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 303

770

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 98

771

17 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 240

772 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 195

773 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 131

785

मियादी पट्टा नं. 177

कुलक्षेत्रफल:

सरकार

07 चाँगमाई कुँवरगाँव गुधोली बाजार

6 10

15 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 134

8 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 153

9 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 194

10 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 57

मियादी पट्टा नं. 167

मियादी पट्टा नं.

26 0

11 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 234

एकसना

कुलक्षेत्रफल:

239 08 खनिकर गाँव

16 2

मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

गुधोली बाजार

241

मियादीपट्टा नं. 39

242 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

243 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

245 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

911

एकसना

912 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 235

एकसना

240

13 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

सरकार

कुल क्षेत्रफल:

15 2

7 56

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

5 09

613 भुईयाँगाँव

गाधुली बाजार-जारी मियादी पट्टा नं. 198

614

मियादी पट्टा नं. 197

615

मियादी पट्टा नं . 7

619

मियादी पट्टा नं. 178

620

मियादी पट्टा नं. 34

621

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38

622

मियादी पट्टानं . 38

सरकार

625

सरकार

626

659

मियांदीपट्टा नं. 178

660

मियादी पट्टा नं. 178

661

मियादी पट्टा नं. 54

684

मियादीपट्टा नं. 106

685

मियादी पट्टा नं. 48

680

मियादी पट्टा नं. 248

681

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

682

मियादी पट्टा नं. 28

690

मियादी पट्टा नं . 11

698

मियादी पट्टा नं. 248

689

सरकार

822

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

825

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

827

मियादी पट्टा नं. 36

495

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

591

मियादी पट्टा नं. 48

870

मियादी पट्टा नं. 201

सरकार

526

631

मियादीपट्टा नं. 197

699

मियादीपट्टा नं. 248

514

सरकार

707

मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

706

मियादी पट्टा नं. 166

627

मियादी पट्टा नं. 95

667

मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

826

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

821

मियादी पट्टा नं. 166

623

मियादी पट्टा नं. 54

493

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

कुल क्षेत्रफल:

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 6

17 0

9 0

15 0

6 0

5 0

15 0

5 0

7 0

19 0

1 0

18 0

3 0

18 0

9 0

14 0

8 0

12 0

6 0

8 0

9 0

12 0

5 0

13 0

9 0

7 5

4 57 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

1 2

8 3

0 10 रायडोंगियागाँव

154

गाधुली बाजार-जारी मियादी पट्टा नं. 65

सरकार

160

165

सरकार

166

मियादीपट्टा नं. 45

167

मियादी पट्टा नं. 48

168

मियादी पट्टानं. 12

169

मियादी पट्टा नं. 451

170

मियादी पट्टा नं. 17

171

मियादीपट्टा नं . 5

172

मियादी पट्टा नं. 62

173

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

174

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

175

मियादी पट्टा नं. 40

178

मियादी पट्टा नं. 40

176

मियादी पट्टा नं . 5

172

मियादी पट्टा नं . 62

182

मियादीपट्टानं. 59

183

मियादी पट्टा.नं. 28

कुल क्षेत्रफल:

फा. सं. ओ-12016/7/2004-ओ.एन.जी.डी.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2004

S. O. 40. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for supply of natural gas to Jorhat and Golaghat towns in the districts of Jorhat and Golaghat , respectively in the state of Assam , Pipeline should be laid from Lakwa to Golaghat by Assam Gas Company Limited. Duliajan;

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land described in the Schedule annexed hereto:

Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it intention to acquire the right of user therein.

2. Any person interested in the said land may within 21 days from the date of this notification send objections and suggestions to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the competent authority , namely, the Deputy Commissioner , Sivasagar District , Assam and such person may also state whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practitioner.

3770 G1/04-8 58

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

SCHEDULE

Circle . Sonari

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

State Assam

District-Sivasagar

Mauza

PattaNo.

Name ofVillage

DagNo.

SI No.

5 01 Ramu Gaon

529

Silakuti

PP No. 202

530

531 Area

2 0

PP No. 203

532

32 0

PP No. 282

537

PPNo. 101

520

PP No. 97

538

3 0

PP No. 206

539

112 0

PP No. 111

799 0

PP No. 102

853

PP No. 134

671

PP No. 227

854

PP No. 203

573 0

8 0

4/2 0

3 0

PP No. 157

857

PP No. 247

861

PP No. 126

862

PP No. 106

863

PP No. 81

864

PP No. 237

866

PP No. 67

870 0

4 0

PPNo. 243

869

PP No. 237

889

PP No. 106

PP No. 42

893

894

PP No. 68

895

PP No. 243

896

PP No. 127

897

PP No. 243

864

PP No. 175

867

PP No. 237

PP No. 205

892

Total Area

9 0

15 0

11 0

6 0

13 0

10 6

5 59

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

PP No. 227

530

Dhopabar

02 Pohusungi Dewdhai

515

6 0

PPNo. 295

517 0

PPNo. 32

514

2 0

PPNo.88

PPNo. 214

511

510

PPNo. 31

509

PP No. 316

504

PP No. 157

503

PPNo. 338

382

15 0

Waste land

383 0

7 0

Wasteland

734

7 0

PPNo. Nil

529

PP No. 295

531 0

11 0

PP No. 227

516

PP No. 242

465

7 0

PP No. 273

579

PPNo. 141

741

3 0

PP No. 295

739

PP No. 367

736

PP No. 205

6 0

7 0

PPNo. 326

735

426

PPNo. 4

427

PPNo. 141

282

18 0

PP No. 135

15 0

PP No. 229

582

496 0

PPNo. 343

494

3 0

PPNo.44

303

PPNo. 83

304

4 0

Waste land

502

PP No. 155

500

4 0

PP No. 117

587

4 0

PPNo. 168

586

PP No. 388

501

Waste land

590

PP No. 12

428 0

1 0

2 0

PPNo. 242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926 12

429

PP No. 192

Dhopabar-Contd.

02 Pohusungi Dewdhai

PP No. 23

431

525

PP No. 227

526

PP No. 25

523

PP No. 188

528

PP No. 188

521

PP No. 225

520

PP No. 355

418

PP No. 403

420

PP No. 424

421

PP No. 8

422

PP No. 132

424

PP No. 132

431

PP No. 23

466

PP No. 40

498

PP No. 334

499

PP No. 5

648

PP No. 160

299

PP No. 54

PP No. 200

301

302

PP No. 296

824

PP No. 310

622

Waste land

498

PP No. 334

497

PP No. 378

591

PP No. 294

592

PP No. 55

593

PP No. 258

604

PP No. 258

PP No. 294

603

602

PP No. 12

647

PP No. 279

581

PP No.406

513

PP No. 188

524

PP No. 245

425

PP No. 100

Total Area [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

8 0

7 0

19 0

4 0

17 0

19 0

5 0

15 0

13 0

18 0

7 0

9 0

18 0

11 0

5 0

17 0

2 0

9 0

18 0

2 0

4 0

17 0

18 18

1 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत काराजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

587. 03 Luthuri Gaon

17 0

PP No. 135

Dhopabar-Contd.

589

6 0

WasteJand

Annual

584

583 0

2 0

PPNo. 95

PP No. 95

465

464

PPNo. 34

448

PPNo. 17

459

PPNo. 58

456

PPNo. 39

703

PP No. 53

451

7 1

19 0

Wast land

454 0

PP No. 108

566 0

PP No. 135

565

Annual

567 0

19 0

PPNo. 135

706

Waste land

702

PP No. 53

467

PPNo. 21

PP No. 39

455

148

10 0

5 0

Waste land

564

TotalArea

Nazira

26 5

16 0

PP No. 38

04 Sanbasa Handique Gaon

PP No. 41

7 0

PP No. 72

29 0

PP No. 114

180 0

PP No. 87

PP No. 26

181

184

PP No. 38

PP No. 65

190

191

PP No. 71

PPNo. 952

192

PP No. 100

193

217

PPNo. 88

218 0

15 0

0 0

4 0

6 0

4 0

PPNo. 87

216

PPNo. 86

220

342

PP No. 66

221 0

PP No. 86

1 62

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

5 1

222 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

PP No. 110

04. SanbasaHandique Gaon Nazira Contd.

223

PP No. 28

225

PP No. 88

341

PP No. 73

342

PP No. 42

343

PP No. 48

344

PP No. 120

345

PP No. 51

346

PP No. 87

347

PP No. 51

348

PP No. 59

349 0

13 0

15 0

10 0

13 0

6 0

18 0

PP No. 132

350

PP No. 50

352

PP No. 101

353

7 0

11 0

PP No. 133

354

PP No. 111

355

PP No. 30

356

Waste land

417

PP No. 87

420

PP No. 14

427

PP No. 76

428

PP No. 52

429

PP No. 62

Waste land

439

430

PP No. 52

PPNo. 73

440

PP No. 18

463

438

PP No. 93

465

PP No. 107

466

PP No. 93

471

PP No. 18

472

PP No. 18

473

474

Waste land

478

Annual

Waste land

477

498

Waste land

530

PP No. 83

PP No. 167

502

Annual

552

Annual

558

Waste land

580

Annual

584 0

17 0

7 0

2 0

8 0

11 0

2 0

3 0

17 0

11 0

17 0

5 0

9 0

4 0

18 1

12 0

5 0

3 0

13 (0

9 0

13 (0)

4 ()

1/2 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

5 2

598

Annual 04 SanbasaHandique Gaon Nazira-Contd.

589

PPNo. 38

418

PP No. 59

503

2 0

6 0

PP No. 167

504

PPNo. 28

500

PPNo. 80

506

Wasteland

515

18 0

Waste land

516

PPNo. 97

517

PPNo. 97

518

PPNo. 97

519

PPNo. 97

520 0

15-1/2

8 0

2 0

Waste land

Annual

537

534

Annual

535

Annual

544

Annual

545

Annual

546

Annual

549

Annual

550

Annual

551

Annual

TotalArea

Nazira

PP No. 91

369 05 Likson Gaon

368 0

19 0

6 0

11 0

6 0

5 0

19 0

8 0

PP No. 134

233

PP No. 40

234

PP No. 87

232

PPNo. 3

PP No. 212

242

243

PP No. 65

270

PP No. 81

271

PP No.143

273

PPNo.104

269

PP No. 38

276

PP No. 84

277

PP No.147

278

PPNo.18

PPNo.132

279

6 0

0 0

4 0

17 0

18 0

15 0

18 0

15 0

2 0

4 64

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926 2

280 05 Likson Gaon

Nazira Contd.

PPNo. 38

281

PP No.117

282

PP No.145

285

PPNo.168

PP No.11

286

287

PP No.116

PP No. 168

288

289

PP No.133

PP No. 168

290

PPNo.13

291

294

PP No. 60

295

PP No. 39

261

PP No. 98

PP No. 183

292

PP No. 79

293

240

PP No. 110

PP No. 99

284

272 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

2 0

18 0

8 0

4 0

16-2 0

3 0

2 0

9 0

10 0

9 0

16-2 0

13 0

4 0

PPNo. 104

PP No. 132

275

Total Area

1245

PP No. 75

Nazira

06 Hullang Katani Gaon

PP No. 19

1231

1223

PP No. 203

PP No. 193

1222

1229

PP No. 12

PP No. 93

1230

1232

PP No. 316

1219

PP No. 193

1220

PP No. 201

1235

PP No. 234

PP No. 176

1236

PP No. 270

1238

PP No. 232

889

888

PP No. 66

887

PP No. 302

846

PP No. 302 0

5 7

11 0

13 0

7 0

2 0

13 0

4 0

2 0

10 0

12 0

6 0

6 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926 1

835

PP No. 255 06 Hullang Katani Gaon Nazira -Contd.

839

PP No. 328

824

PP No. 91

PP No. 301

826

828

PP No.

PP No. 307

836

834

PP No. 62

PP No. 83

854

855

PP No.

Waste land

783

784

PP No. 177

782

PP No. 195

PP No. 269

781

754

PP No. 89

PP No. 133

752

757

PP No.161

758

PP No. 236

PP No. 143

759

760

4 0

15 0

2 0

3 0

6 0

15 0

4 0

15 0

18 0

15 0

6 0

PP No.69

793

PP No. 103

764

PPNo. 195

1237

PP No. 336

1221

PP No. 146

1234

PP No. 139

1233

PP No. 153

780

Annual

789

PP No. 16

790

PP No. 195

PP No. 182

791

792

PP No. 69

761

PP No. 303

770

PPNo. 98

771

PPNo. 240

772

PP No. 195

773

PP No. 131

785

PPNo. 177

Total Area 3770 G1/04-9

0 0

2 0

8 0

11 0

6 0

5 0

15 0

6 10

2 66

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

1 07

GadhuliBazar Waste land

Changmai Konwar

Gaon

-Contd .

PP No. 134

PP No. 153

PP No. 194

PPNo. 57

PP No. 167

PP No.

PPNo. 234

Annual

TotalArea 08 Khanikar Gaon

Gadhuli Bazar PP No. 39

239

PP No. 39

241

PP No. 39

242

243

PP No. 39

245

PP No. 49

911

Annual

912 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

15 0

8 0

6 0

16 0

11 0

4 0

5 2

16 0

15 0

PP No. 235

Annual

240 0

13 0

PP No. 39

Waste Land 89

Total area

Gadhuli Bazar

613

11 0

PP No. 198

(1 ) Bhuyan Gaon

614

PP No. 197

615

PP No. 7

619

PP No. 178

17 0

9 0

5 0

PPNo. 34

620

621

PP No. 38

622 0

6 0

PP No. 38

625

Waste land

626 0

Waste land

659

PP No. 178

660

661

PP No. 54

684

PPNo. 106

685

PP No. 48

680 0

15 0

5 0

19 0

1 0

PP No. 248

681

PP No. 3

682

PP No. 28

690

PP No. 11

698 0

377

17 0

PPNo. 248

10 67 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

6 1

0 Gadhuli Bazar-Contd.

689

Waste land

09 BhuyanGaon

822

PP No. 76

825

PP No. 76

827

PP No. 36

495

PP No. 76

591

PP No. 48

PP No. 201

870

Waste land

526

631

PP No. 197

PP No. 248

699

514

Waste land

707

PP No. 202

706

PP No. 166

627

PP -No . 95

PP No. 183

667

PP No. 76

826

821

PP No. 166

623

PPNo. 54

493

PP No. 76

TotalArea

154

2 Gadhuli Bazar PP No. 65

10 RaidongiaGaon

160

Waste land

165

Waste land

166

PP No. 45

167

PP No. 48

168

PP No. 12

169

PP No. 451

170

PP No. 17

171

PP No. 5

172

PP No. 62

173

PP No. 5

174

PP No. 5

175

PP No. 40

178

PP No. 40

176

PP No. 5

172

PP No. 62

182

PP No. 59

183

PP No. 28

Total Area

[F. No. O- 12016/7/2004 -ONGD- IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ० 41.- जबकि केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि जोरहाट और गोलाघाट शहर, जिला जौरहाट एवं गोलाघाट को प्राकृतिक गैस आपूर्ति के लिये लाकुवा से गोलाघाट तक और खोराघाट ( घोलापानी ) से गोलाघाट तक आसाम गैस कम्पनी लिमिटेड, दुलियाजान द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछायी जानी चाहिए । और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों को बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये इसके साथ उपबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित करती है । उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये आपत्ति और सुझाव सक्षम अधिकारी नामतः जिला उपायुक्त गोलाघाट, असम को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकता है ।

और ऐसी आपत्ति और सुझाव देने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी बताएगा कि क्या वह अपनी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से चाहता है अथवा किसी विधि व्यवसायी के माध्यम से ।

अनुसूची चक्र: सरुपाथार

राज्य: आसाम

जिला: गोलाघाट

क्रम गांव का नाम

मौजा

पट्टानं.

नं.

4 1 2

सरुपथार

टिप्पणी दाग नं.

क्षेत्रफल कट्टा

बीघा लूसा

8 9 5

436

मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

1. 1 नं. राजपुखरी गांव

3 नं. खण्ड

एकसना नं .

435

454

मियादीपट्टा नं . 204

453

मियादी पट्टा नं. 116

654

मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

486

मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

492

मियादी पट्टा नं. 61

493

मियादी पट्टा नं . 210

491

मियादी पट्टा नं . 136

507

मियादी पट्टा नं. 134

505

मियादी पट्टा नं. 51

510

मियादी पट्टा नं. 235

522

मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

524

मियादी पट्टा नं . 357

523

मियादीपट्टा नं. 357

538

मियादी पट्टा नं. 78

542

मियादी पट्टा नं. 166

सरकारी

543

558

मियादी पट्टा नं . 76

566

मियादी पट्टा नं . 58

सरकारी

सरकारी 0

641

667

2 69 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

8 3

सरुपथार

593

मियादी पट्टा नं. 53

1. 1 नं. राजपुखरी गांव

592

3 नं. खण्ड

मियादी पट्टा नं. 242

606

मियादी पट्टा नं. 242

607

मियादी पट्टा नं. 143

618

मियादी पट्टा नं. 142

632

मियादी पट्टा नं. 173

637

मियादीपट्टा नं . 140

642

मियादीपट्टा नं. 230

646

मियादी पट्टा नं. 316

647

मियादी पट्टा नं. 124

648

मियादी पट्टा नं. 120

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरुपधार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 33

2. 1 नं. राजपुखरी गांव

5 1 नं. खण्ड

मियादीपट्टा नं . 40

मियादी पट्टा नं. 32

मियादी पट्टा नं . 2

मियादी पट्टा नं. 21

मियादी पट्टा नं. 108

एकसना

सरकारी

मियादीपट्टा नं. 324

मियादी पट्टा नं. 181

सरकारी

101

सरकारी

143

मियादी पट्टा नं. 176

170

मियादी पट्टा नं. 176

174

मियादी पट्टा नं. 244

175

मियादी पट्टा नं . 347

188

एकरसना

कुल क्षेत्रफल

358

सरुपथार

3. काचमारी गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 199

418

सरकारी

361

यिादीपट्टा नं. 170

362

मियादी पट्टा नं . 49

360

सरकारी

359

मियादी पट्टा नं . 59

कुल क्षेत्रफल

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1, 2005/PAUSA 11. 1926

4 4. रेगंमा गाँव

सरुपथार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 177

निवादी पट्टा नं. 177

मियादी पट्टा नं. 174

नियादी पट्टा नं. 171

मियादी पट्टा नं. 117

एकसना

मियादी पट्टा नं. 71

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं . 139

मियादी पट्टा नं. 71

मियादी पट्टा नं. 77

मियादी पट्टा नं . 71

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 138

मियादी पट्टा नं . 138

मियादी पट्टा नं. 86

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) | 5

9 0

104

103

102

164

174

कुलक्षेत्रफल

सरुपथार

5. इकराणी गाँव

सरकारी 1 नं. खण्ड

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

मियादी पट्टा नं. 87

मियादी पट्टा नं. 79

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

मियादी पट्टा नं. 112

मियादी पट्टा नं. 58

मियादी पट्टा नं. 107

मियादीपट्टा नं. 122 19

102

107

कुल क्षेत्रफल

6. इकराणी गाँव

सरुपथार

सरकारी 2 नं. खंड

मियादी पट्टा नं. 105

मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 197

मियादी पट्टा नं. 123 0

266

170

213

228

426

227

कुलक्षेत्रफल

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

सरकारी

बरपथार

7. 2 नं. प्रेमहारा गाँव 1 नं . खण्ड

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 59

खालि

मियादी पट्टा नं. 187

मियादी पट्टा नं. 20

मियादी पट्टा नं. 14

मियादी पट्टा नं. 70

71 6

9 1

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी

बरपथार

8. सरुलागंठा गाँव 1 नं. एवं 2 नं . खंड

169

कुल क्षेत्रफल

बरपथार

सरकारी 9. बरपाभजान गाँव

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी

बरपधार

सरकारी 10. बरपधार माटिखोला ताउन 1 नं. खण्ड

सरकारी

सरकारी 0

217

191

236

249

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी

बरपथार

11. बरपधार गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 7

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं . 7

मियादीपट्टा नं. 7

मियादी पट्टा नं . 7

मियादी पट्टा नं. 7

मियादी पट्टा नं. 7 1

115

116

179

180

181

182

183

184

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी

बरपथार

12. पाभजान गाँव 1 नं. खण्ड

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

मियादी पट्टानं. 95

मियादी पट्टा नं. 121

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

सरकारी

एकसना 0

151

50 72

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1. 2005 / PAUSA 11. 1926

पाभजान गाँव

बरपथार

सरकारी 1 नं० खण्ड

एकसना

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

एकसना

मियादी पट्टा नं. 107

एकसना

मियादी पट्टा नं. 73

सरकारी

एकसना

मियादी पट्टा नं. 152

मियादी पट्टा नं. 61

मियादी पट्टा नं. 184

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं . 76

मियादी पट्टा नं. 130

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 130

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 126

मियादी पट्टा नं. 193

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 90

सरकारी

[ PART 11- Sec . 3 (ii) ] 5

9 79

108

109

110

119

142

148

149

150

156

172

173

174

176

179

180

203

206

214

222

248

208

कुल क्षेत्रफल

13. जोरहाटियां गाँव

वरपथार

सरकारी

कुल क्षेत्रफल

बरपथार

सरकारी 14. मांपुल गाँव

सरकारी

102

154

178

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी

वरपथार

15. रतनपुर गाँव

सरकारी 1

196

198

कुल क्षेत्रफल

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

16. सेनछोवा गाँव

बरपथार

मियादी पट्टा नं.3

एकसना

सरकारी

मियांदी पट्टा नं . 69

सरकारी

एकसना

मियादी पट्टा नं. 73

मियादी पट्टा नं . 64

मियादी पट्टा नं. 54

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

सरकारी

मियादी पट्टा नं . 21

मियादी पट्टा नं. 48

मियादी पट्टा नं. 22

सरकारी

मियादीपट्टा नं . 65

एकसना

सरकारी

73 5

9 0

238

241

242

243

244

245

247

250

254

255

256

257

273

274

275

279

280

286

301

302

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

351

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी

बरपथार

17. 1 नं. प्रेमहारा गाँव

कुल क्षेत्रफल

30सना

बरपथार

18. पाभजान बागान

30सना

सरकारी

30सना

कुल क्षेत्रफल

3770 G1/04-10 74

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

बरपथार

सरकारी 19. 1 नं . तामुलि गाँव

सरकारी

बरपथार

सरकारी 20. 2 नं. तामुलि गाँव

सरकारी

एकसना

सरकारी

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

267

268

263

262

315

347

314

कुल क्षेत्रफल

मियादी पट्टा नं. 13

सरकारी

102

103

118

119

मियादी पट्टा नं. 21

156

मियादी पट्टा नं. 7

सरकारी

एकसना

सरकारी

एकसना

सरकारी

163

164

165

166

167

168

351

354

363

मियादी पट्टा नं. 33

सरकारी

172 21. 2 नं . मलहानितुप गाँव घिलाधारी

177

178

180

सरकारी

198

199

सरकारी

200

सरकारी

197

174 291

कुल क्षेत्रफल

एकसना नं.

मियादी पट्टा नं. 12

मियादी पट्टा नं. 9

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादी पट्टा नं . 11

मियादी पट्टा नं. 22

कुल क्षेत्रफल [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

घिलाधारी

22. कालुजान गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 58

18 सरकारी

27 मियादी पट्टा नं . 26

62 मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

63 मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

81 मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

82 मियादीपट्टा नं . 72

83 सरकारी

84 सरकारी

87 मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

107 मियादीपट्टा नं. १

141 एकसना नं.

154 सरकारी

155 मियादी पट्टा नं. 37

190 मियादी पट्टा नं. 27

201 सरकारी

202 मियादी पट्टा नं. 30

204 मियादी पट्टा नं. 10

235 मियादी पट्टा नं. 12

242 मियादी पट्टा नं. 13

247 मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

189 मियादी पट्टा नं. 27

271 सरकारी

272 मियादी पट्टा नं. 50

274 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

289 मियादी पट्टा नं. 54

378 मियादी पट्टा नं. 55

380 मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

387 सरकारी

385 सरकारी

कुल क्षेत्रफल

14 सरकारी

घिलाधारी

23. चाकियालटिंग गाँव

3 सरकारी

9 सरकारी

30सना

65 सरकारी

कुल क्षेत्रफल 6

18 0

6 0

15 0

6 0

5 0

3 0

1 0

17 0

10 0

S 0

9 0

18 0

12 0

11 0

17 0

13 0

18 0

7 0

6 0

9 0

2 0

18 0

3 0

2 0

3 0

8 0

01 1

3 76

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

बिलाधारी

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ) 6

8 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 92

24. नूगुरा गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

मियादी पट्टा नं. 58

मियादी पट्टा नं. 32

मियादी पट्टा नं. 37

मियादी पट्टा नं. 84

मियादी पट्टा नं. 44

मियादी पट्टा नं. 14

मियादी पट्टा नं. 58

मियादी पट्टा नं. 100

मियादी पट्टा नं. 36

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

109

मियादी पट्टा नं . 35

117

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

120.

मियादी पट्टा नं. 43

114 सरकारी

122 सरकारी

123

9 0

18 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 43

124

मियादी पट्टा नं. 43

186

मियादी पट्टा नं. 51

187

मियादी पट्टा नं . १

188

मियादी पट्टा नं. 71

532

मियादी पट्टा नं . 84

524

मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

191

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

198

मियादी पट्टा नं. 86

199

मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

200 सरकारी

211

2 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 89

212

मियादी पट्टा नं . 89

213

मियादी पट्टा नं. 111

214

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

215

मियादी पट्टा नं . 107

216

मियादी पट्टा नं . 86

225

मियादी पट्टा नं. 107

345

मियादी पट्टा नं . 102

346

मियादी पट्टा नं . 83

348

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

कुल क्षेत्रफल

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

5 2

घिलाधारी

516 25. आइतोनियामिरि गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 75

480 मियादी पट्टा नं. 75

498 मियादी पट्टानं. 43

468 मियादी पट्टा नं. 2

467 मियादी पट्टा नं. 45

479 मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

539 मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

540 मियादी पट्टा नं . 29

449 मियादी पट्टा नं . 84

450 मियादी पट्टा नं. 62

458 मियादी पट्टा नं. 33

390 मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

400 मियादी पट्टा नं. 61

415 मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

254 मियादी पट्टा नं. 92

255 मियादी पट्टा नं. 77

272 मियादीपट्टा नं . 92

273 मियादी पट्टा नं. 46

277 मियादी पट्टा नं. 77

221 मियादी पट्टा नं. 11

223 मियादी पट्टा नं . 86

76 मियादी पट्टा नं. 73

250 सरकारी

294 मियादी पट्टा नं . 94

309 मियादी पट्टा नं. 37

320 मियादी पट्टा नं. 99

321 मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

मरकारी

348

349 मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

362 सरकारी

390 मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

542 मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

510 मियादी पट्टा नं. 75

502 मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

322 मियादी पट्टानं. 53

सरकारी

511

543 मियादी पट्टा नं. 43

555 मिंयादी पट्टा नं. 76

कुल क्षेत्रफल

8 6

11 0

4 0

9 0

6 0

8 0

17 0

15 0

9 0

18 0

9 0

7 0

19 0

9 0

17 0

9 0

15 1

14 0

7 0

4 0

1 0

17 0

13 0

9 0

8 0

13 0

9 0

18 0

11 0

7 0

0 0

15 0

2 8

7 78

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

1 2

5 26. बार्टिग ग्रांट

घिलाधारी

2 फिःसिः नं. 1

3 फिःसिः नं. 1

4 फिः सिः नं. 1

6 फिः सिः नं. 1

19 फिःसिः नं . 1

49 फिः सिः नं. 1

57 फिः सिः नं. 1

98 फिःसिः नं. 1

101 फिःसिः नं. 1 [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

8 0

2 1

16 0

12 0

2 0

16 0

4 0

18 2

कुल क्षेत्रफल

27. गारी गाँव

घिालाधारी

73 मियादी पट्टा नं. 14:

74 सरकारी

75 0

15 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 131

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 130

77 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 130

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

162 सरकारी

सरकारी

285

293

8 0

4 0

6 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 130

294 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 138

295 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 74

296 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 70

297 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 30

299 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 138

300 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

522

सरकारी

523

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

528

मियादी पट्टा नं. 30

529

मियादी पट्टा नं. 30

530 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

533 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

535

मियादी पट्टा नं. 41

534 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

536

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 120

537

मियादी पट्टा नं. 10

538 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

539 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 120

540

मियादी पट्टा नं. 41

541 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 41

542

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

543 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 22

544 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

545 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 74

546 0

मियादीपट्टा नं: 43

कुल क्षेत्रफल

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

आठगाँव

सरकारी

2 28. रुपकलिया गाँव (१ म खंड)

मियादी पट्टा नं. 81

1416 मियादी पट्टा नं. 81

121 मियादी पट्टा नं. 257

4 मियादी पट्टा नं. 64

5 मियादीपट्टा नं. 244

6 मियादी पट्टा नं. 257

7 मियादी पट्टा नं. 77

156 सरकारी

8 मियादीपट्टा नं. 245

9 मियादी पट्टा नं. 174

10 मियादी पट्टा नं. 174

11 मियादी पट्टा नं. 310

14 मियादी पट्टा नं. 345

17 मियादी पट्टा नं. 221

18 मियादीपट्टा नं. 124

19 मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

20 मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

21 मियादी पट्टा नं. 203

22 मियादी पट्टा नं. 203

24 मियादी पट्टा नं. 201

25 मियादी पट्टा नं. 10

26 सरकारी

28 मियादी पट्टा नं. 203

30 सरकारी

31 मियादी पट्टा नं. 203

32 मियादी पट्टा नं. 14

33 मियादीपट्टा नं. 163

सरकारी

1338

34 मियादी पट्टा नं. 126

35 मियादी पट्टा नं. 20

36 मियादी पट्टा नं. 164

37 मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

38 मियादीपट्टा नं. 203

1388 मियादी पट्टा नं. 222

41 मियादी पट्टा नं. 222

42 मियादी पट्टा नं. 224

43 मियादी पट्टा नं. 209

44 मियादी पट्टा नं. 24

45 मियादीपट्टा नं. 83

46 मियादी पट्टा नं. 153

49 मियादी पट्टा नं. 168

50 मियादी पट्टा नं . 14

कुलक्षेत्रफल 6

S 0

0 0

11 0

7 0

15 0

19 0

6 0

4 0

2 0

10 0

17 0

18 0

13 0

18 0

6 0

2 0

9 0

7 0

6 0

17 0

5 0

18 0

15 0

9 0

13 0

18 0

3 0

15 0

8 0

9 0

11 0

17 7

19 80

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

चक्र: गोलाघाट

PART 11- Sic. 3 ( ii) |

जिला: गोलाघाट

5 29. चक्रधरा गाँव

आठगाँव

राज्य: आसाम 6

8 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 7

5 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 9

18 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 199

7 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 199

1351 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

213 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

214 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 48

216 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 100

218 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 24

219 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

1356 सरकारी

222 0

14 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 25

229 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 24

231 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

236 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

237 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 196

238 सरकारी

239 0

2 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

240

मियादी पट्टा नं. 330

241

15 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 100

242 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 281

246

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 282

400 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 174

401 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 260

402 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 162

403 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 411

407 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 281

409

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

412

6 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 281

413 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 112

415 सरकारी

416 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

419 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

420 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 112

421 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 273

708 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 112

709 सरकारी

711 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 247

712 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 200

720 0

1829

मियादी पट्टा नं. 303

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

1 2

आठगाँव

721 29. चक्रधरा गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 141

729 मियादी पट्टा नं. 303

742 मियादी पट्टा नं. 140

743 मियादी पट्टा नं. 140

746 मियादीपट्टा नं. 261

747 मियादी पट्टा नं. 201

1139 मियादी पट्टा नं. 117

1140 मियादी पट्टा नं. 118

1141 मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

1143 मियादी पट्टा नं. 247

1144 मियादी पट्टा नं. 264

1145 मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

1146 सरकारी

1148 मियादी पट्टा नं. 263

1149 मियादी पट्टा नं. 118

217 सरकारी

422 मियादी पट्टा नं. 173

कुलक्षेत्रफल

मौखोवा

1060 30. बेंगेनाखुवा गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 145

1059 मियादी पट्टा नं. 145

1049 मियादी पट्टा नं. 170

1047 मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

1045 मियादीपट्टा नं. 235

1051 मियादी पट्टा नं. 133

1044 मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

1035 मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

1034 मियादी पट्टा नं. 123

1036 मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

1064 मियादीपट्टा नं. 284

1061 मियादी पट्टा नं. 201

1024 मियादी पट्टा नं. 178

1025 मियादीपट्टा नं. 248

1026 मियादी पट्टा नं. 25

1017 मियादी पट्टा नं. 272

1018 मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

1013 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

1014 मियादी पट्टा नं . 272

1015 मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

977 मियादी पट्टा नं. 15

983 मियादी पट्टा नं. 11

980 सरकारी

981 मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

3770 GI/04-11

81 6

9 0

8 0

11 0

19 0

2 0

1 0

13 0

7 0

16 0

2 0

18 10

15 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

6 0

8 0

6 0

4 0

13 0

2 0

-64717694 82

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

1 2

मौखोवा

30. बेंगेनाखुवा गाँव

982

[PART II-SEC, 3( ii) ] 6

8 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 169

986 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 223

987 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 129

1087 सरकारी

842 0

6 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38

843

2 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

844

6 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

850

9 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 156

845

3 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 120

849 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 234

848 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 202

847 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 277

634

11 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 42

635 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

636 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 223

637 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 20

639 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 161

649 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 160

643 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 188

642 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 188

676 सरकारी

628 ว

4 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 188

640

मियादी पट्टा नं. 188

627 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 188

625 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

254 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 198

102 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 128

103 सरकारी

256

7 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

257 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 106

258 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 228

242 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 219

245 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 219

243 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 15

244 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 15

101 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 256

255

2 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 85

108 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 177

98 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 256

99 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 256

100 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 256

97 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 184

641 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

1016 0

538936

मियादी पट्टा नं. 214

कुल क्षेत्रफल

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

1 2

मौखोवा

159 .

85 6

8 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 17

31. बेंगेनाखुवा ग्रान्ट गाँव प्रथम भाग

164 मियादी पट्टा नं.

165 0

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 19

168 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 18

163 मियादीपट्टा नं.

162 0

9 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 16

169 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 33

170 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 20

171 सरकारी

173 0

17 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

174 सरकारी

188 सरकारी

189 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 34

191 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 34

194 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

196 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

215 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 15

216 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

214 0

फिःसिनं. 1

く

कुल क्षेत्रफल

1525 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 144

32. बरफुकनरखाट गाँव मौखोवा

1524 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 322

1526

मियादी पट्टा नं. 144

1527

2 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 322

1528 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 317

1529 सरकारी

1530 0

13 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 322

1536 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 317

1541 सरकारी

सरकारी

1542

1544 0

9 0

8 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 230

1545 सरकारी

1546 0

17 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 134

1415 0

मियादीपट्टा नं . 406

1414 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 297

1193 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 430

1192

1191 0

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 442

1190 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 442

1189 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 442

1041 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 153

1043 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

1044 सरकारी

1045 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 153

1047 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 7:30

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

1 2

मौखोवा

650 32. बरफुकनर खाट गाँव

सरकारी

652

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 6

8 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 284

653 सरकारी

667 0

11 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 123

665

मियादी पट्टा नं. 460

660 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 284

501

मियादी पट्टा नं. 331

502 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 313

503 सरकारी

101

मियादी पट्टा नं. 324

105 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 117

104 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 439

117

10 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 324

118 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 324

116 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 401

129

मियादी पट्टा नं . 401

130 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 324

132

मियादी पट्टा नं. 324

131 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 324

134

मियादीपट्टा नं. 241

135 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 324

136 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

664

मियादी पट्टा नं. 284

1046 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 7.3

कुल क्षेत्रफल

33. तरफात गाँव

मौखोवा

सरकारी

18 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 281

31 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 281

13 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 281

9 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 318

15 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 238

14 सरकारी

17 1

12 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 192

21 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 67

मियादी पट्टा नं. 315

19 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 315

सरकारी

7 4

कुल क्षेत्रफल

सरकारी 34. गौहाँई गाँव

कछारीहात

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 226

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 50

सरकारी

16 0

3 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

5 34. गौहाँई गाँव

कछारीहात

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

12 मियादी पट्टा नं. 264

मियादी पट्टा नं. 152

10 मियादी पट्टा नं. 156

25 मियादी पट्टा नं. 156

26 मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

27 मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

मियादी पट्टा नं. 162

30 मियादी पट्टा नं. 162

35 मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

36 मियादी पट्टा नं. 193

29 मियादी पट्टा नं. 156

कुल क्षेत्रफल 35. कचारीहात गाँव

कचारीहात

990 मियादीपट्टा नं. 221

991 मियादी पट्टा नं. 139

992 मियादी पट्टा नं. 186

993 मियादीपट्टा नं.

890 मियादी पट्टा नं. 302

889 मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

882 सरकारी

884 मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

885 मियादी पट्टा नं. 156

879 मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

878 मियादी पट्टा नं. 82

886 मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

599 सरकारी

875 मियादी पट्टा नं.

874 मियादी पट्टा नं. 91

873 मियादी पट्टा नं. 137

1358 मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

603 मियादीपट्टा नं. 243

618 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

617 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

619 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

620 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

616 मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

623 सरकारी

1318 शून्य

624 मियादी पट्टा नं. 308

612 मियादी पट्टा नं. 139

510 मियादी पट्टा नं. 115

1356 मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

508 सरकारी

507 मियादी पट्टा नं. 57

506 मियादी पट्टा नं. 300

85 6

8 0

9 0

10 0

2 0

13 0

18 0

14 0

13 0

9 0

6 0

5 4

15 0

2 0

15 0

3 0

1 0

17 0

11 0

4 0

2 0

15 0

18 0

6 0

15 0

11 0

15 0

2 0

7 0

2 0

10 0

6 0

13 0

15 0

2 0

4 0

13 0

46778

2 86

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

35. कछारीहात गाँव- जारी कछारीहात

505

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 6

मियादी पट्टा नं. 265

503 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . शून्य

504 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 106

407 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 41

393 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 13

522 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 300

1364 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

399 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

400 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

401 0

मियादीपट्टा नं . 234

403 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

404

मियादी पट्टा नं . 274

405 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 106

408 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 141

409 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 156

412 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 294

402 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 121

291 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 241

286 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 311

287

4 0

मियादीपट्टा नं. 296

115 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 69

117

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 297

129 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 297

131

मियादी पट्टा नं. 196

118

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 187

119 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 297

128 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 32

126 1

मियादी पट्टा नं . 272

127 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 272

140

मियादी पट्टा नं . 283

141

4 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 230

142 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 230

139

3 0

मियादी पट्टा नं . 32

1335 सरकारी

883 0

7 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

605 सरकारी

सरकारी 0

7 0

5 19

कुल क्षेत्रफल

36. रायडोंगिया गाँव

कछारीहाट

253 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 266

252 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 86

254 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 266

256 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 395

257

मियादी पट्टा नं. 398

259 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 82

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

262 36. रायडोंगिया गाँव- जारी कछारीहाट-जारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 306

263 मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

264 मियादी पट्टा नं. 39

265 मियादी पट्टा नं. 306

266 सरकारी

267 मियादीपट्टा नं . 326

390 मियादी पट्टा नं . 263

391 मियादी पट्टा नं. 189

397 मियादी पट्टा नं. 84

388 मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

387 मियादी पट्टा नं. 307

389 मियादी पट्टा नं. 443

411 मियादी पट्टा नं. 436

415 मियादी पट्टा नं. 307

416 मियादी पट्टा नं. 132

417 मियादी पट्टा नं . 2

418 मियादी पट्टा नं . 129

419 मियादी पट्टा नं. 369

421 मियादी पट्टा नं . 132

422 मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

423 मियादी पट्टा नं. 305

424 मियादी पट्टा नं. 181

425 मियादी पट्टा नं. 303

426 मियादी पट्टा नं . 227

427 सरकारी

428 मियादी पट्टा नं. 323

429 मियादी पट्टा नं. 321

430 मियादी पट्टा नं. 179

431 मियादी पट्टा नं. 449

432 मियादी पट्टा नं. 353

433 मियादी पट्टा नं. 203

435 मियादी पट्टा नं. 302

437 मियादी पट्टा नं. 60

438 मियादी पट्टा नं. 258

439 मियादी पट्टा नं. 303

440 मियादी पट्टा नं. 117

443 मियादी पट्टा नं. 209

445 मियादीपट्टा नं. 177

446 मियादी पट्टा नं. 392

447 मियादी पट्टा नं. 205

448 मियादी पट्टा नं. 205

449 मियादीपट्टा नं . 92

450 मियादी पट्टा नं. 209

451 मियादी पट्टा नं. 60

452 मियादी पट्टा नं. 373

453 मियादी पट्टा नं. 70

87 6

8 0

18 0

3 0

2 0

6 0

15 0

17 0

5 0

2 0

5 0

12 0

16 0

10 0

9 0

6 0

15 0

13 0

7 0

11 0

13 0

15 0

8 0

15 0

9 0

7 0

9 0

11 0

17 0

7 0

8 0

15 0

10 0

2 0

15 0

13 0

7 0

4 0

77617

11 88

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

454

36. रायडोंगिया गाँव- जारी कछारीहाट- जारी

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 6

मियादी पट्टा नं. 255

455

मियादी पट्टा नं. 154

456

11 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 60

457

मियादी पट्टा नं. 60

458

मियादी पट्टा नं. 60

460

मियादी पट्टा नं. 301

459

मियादी पट्टा नं. 415

461

मियादी पट्टा नं. 256

462

मियादी पट्टा नं. 33

463

मियादी पट्टा नं. 414

464

मियादी पट्टा नं . 321

465

मियादी पट्टा नं. 142

466

मियादी पट्टा नं. 254

467

मियादी पट्टा नं. 301

468

मियादी पट्टा नं. १

469

मियादी पट्टा नं. 142

470

मियादी पट्टा नं. 255

471

मियादी पट्टा नं . 413

472

मियादीपट्टा नं. 413

473

मियादी पट्टा नं. 125

474

मियादी पट्टा नं. 144

475

मियादी पट्टा नं . 255

476

मियादीपट्टा नं. 322

477

मियादी पट्टा नं. 361

478

मियादी पट्टा नं. 225

479

मियादी पट्टा नं. 226

480

मियादी पट्टा नं . 205

481

मियादी पट्टा नं. 413

482

मियादी पट्टा नं. 124

483

मियादीपट्टा नं. 255

484

मियादी पट्टा नं . 247

500

मियादी पट्टा नं. 361

501

मियादी पट्टा नं. 157

502

मियादी पट्टा नं. 366

497

मियादी पट्टा नं. 390

498

मियादी पट्टा नं. 394

495

0 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 223

496

मियादी पट्टा नं. 390

560

मियादी पट्टा नं. 448

268

मियादी पट्टा नं. 77

559

मियादी पट्टा नं. 178

446

मियादी पट्टा नं. 392

976 सरकारी

279 सरकारी

556

1 0

70 0

मियादी पट्टा नं. 180

कुल क्षेत्रफल

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/7/2004-ओएनजीडी- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2004

S. O. 41. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for supply of natural gas to Jorhat and Golaghat towns in the districts of Jorhat and Golaghat respectively in the state of Assam , Piplines should be laid from Lakwa to Golaghat and Khoraghat (Gholapani ) to Golaghat by Assam Gas Company Limited, Duliajan;

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquistion of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares it intention to acquire the right of user therein .

2.Any person interested in the said land may within 21 days from the date of this notification send objections and suggestions to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the competent authority , namely , the Deputy Commissioner, Golaghat District, Assam and such person may also state whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practitioner.

SCHEDULED

State Assam

Dist.-Golaghat

Circle-Sarupathar

Mouza

PattaNo.

DagNo.

Name of the Village

Sl. No.

5 2

436

PP No. 72

Sarupathar

1 1No. Rajapukhuri Village

435

Annul 3rd part

454

PPNo. 204

453

PP No. 216

654

PPNo. 72

486

PP No. 69

PPNo. 61

492

493

PPNo. 210

PP No. 136

491

507

PP No. 134

PPNo. 51

505

510

PP No. 235

522

PP No. 183

524

PP No. 357

523

PPNo. 357

538

PPNo. 78

542

PP No. 166

Waste land

543

558

PP No. 76

566

PP No. 58

Waste land

641

667

Waste land

PPNo. 53

593

PP No. 242

592

606

PPNo. 242

607

PPNo. 143

618

PP No. 142

632

PP No. 173

637

PP No. 140

PPNo. 230

642

646

PP No. 316

PP No. 124

647

648

PP No. 120

Total Area 3770 G1/04-12

Area K

17 0

13 0

6 0

11 0

6 0

8 0

6 0

13 0

9 0

13 0

(0)

17 0

()

6 0

1 0

18 0

18 11

1 90

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926 2

5 1

PP No. 33 2. 1 No. Rajapukhuri village Sarupathar

1stPart

PP No. 40

PPNo. 32

PP No. 2

PP No. 21

PP No. 108

Annual

Waste land

PP No. 324

PP No. 181

Waste land

101

Waste land

143

PP No. 176

170

PP No. 176

174

PP No. 244

175

PPNo. 347

188

Annual

TotalArea

358

PPNo. 199 3. Kachamari gaon

Sarupathar

418

Waste land

361

PPNo. 170

362

PP No. 49

360

Waste land

359

PPNo. 59

Total Area

PP No. 117

Sarupathar

4. Rangama gaon

PP No. 117

PP No. 174

PP No. 171

PP No. 117

Annual

PP No. 71

Wate land

Waste land

PP No. 139

PPNo. 71

PPNo. 77

PP No. 71

104

Waste land

103

PP No. 138

102

PP No. 138

164

PP No. 138

174

PP No. 86

Total Area [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 6

8 0

5 0

9 0

1 0

6 (0

10 0

()

16 1

15 (0

()

7 ()

11 ()

()

18 0

17 0

6 0

17 0

()

8 0

(0)

13 2

0 (0

11 ()

(0)

()

05 0

()

16 0

02 0

()

9 0

()

0 1

16 (0

06 (0

() ()

()

13 0

04 ()

9 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926 1

Waste land

Sarupathar

5. Ikarani gaon

IstPart

Waste land

PP No. 3

PP No. 87

PP No. 79

PPNo. 80

PP No. 112

PPNo. 58

102

PP No. 107

107

PPNo. 122

Total Area

266

Waste land 6. Ikarani gaon

Sarupathar

2nd Part

170

PP No. 105

213

PP No. 72

228

Waste land

426

PP No. 197

227

PP No. 123

Total Area

Waste land 7. 2 No. Premhara gaon

Borpathar

1stPart

Waste land

PP No. 1

PPNo. 59

Nil

PP No. 187

PPNo. 200

PPNo. 14

PP No. 70

Total Area

169

Waste land

Borpathar

8. Sarulangtha gaon Ist and 2nd Part

TotalArea

7 Waste land

Borpathar

9. Borpabhajan gaon

Total Area

217

Waste land 10. Barpathar Matikhola town Borpathar

IstPart

191

Waste land

236

Waste land

249

Waste land

Total Area

Waste land

Borpathar

11.Borpathar gaon

115

PP No. 7

116

Waste land

179

PP No. 7

180

181

PP No. 7

182

PP No. 7

183

PP No. 7

184

PP No. 7

Total Area

91 6

11 0

()

10 0

(0)

02 ()

01 (0

02 (0

07 0

15 ()

19 0

17 5

8 0

13 1

15 ()

19 ()

()

15 1

()

18 +

10 1

(0)

()

3 2

()

10 ()

1 +

04 5

4 (0

3 1

2 2

04 0

()

11 (0

()

(0)

11 ()

13 ()

()

2 92

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926 2

Waste land 12. Pavajan gaon

Borpathar

1stPart

P.P. No. 3

P.P. No. 95

P.P. No. 121

Waste land

P.P. No. 3

151

Waste land

Annual

Waste land

Annual

P.P. No. 23

Annual

P.P. No. 107

Annual

108

P.P. No. 73

109

Waste land

110

Waste land

119

Waste land

142

Annual

148

P.P. No. 152

149

P.P. No. 61

150

P.P. No. 184

156

Waste land

172

P.P. No. 76

173

PP No. 76

174

P.P. No. 130

176

Waste land

179

P.P. No. 130

180

Waste land

203

P.P. No. 126

206

P.P. No. 193

214

Waste land

222

P.P. No. 90

248

Waste land

208

Waste land

Total Area

Waste land

Borpathar

13. Jorhatia gaon

Total Area

102

Waste land

Borpathar

14. Sungpul gaon

154

Waste land

178

Waste land

TotalArea

196

Waste land

Borpathar

15. Ratanpur Gaon

198

Waste land

Total Area [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )] 6

15 0

06 0

04 0

()

15 0

18 0

()

(0)

0 1

12 (0

()

13 (0

11 0

13 0

09 (0)

17 0

()

18 0

08 (0

()

09 0

17 ()

()

06 0

15 ()

15 0

()

15 ()

()

08 (0

(X)

()

(0)

02 ()

19 ()

()

01 ()

03 3

07 0

6 15

(0) 3

()

15 1

()

10 2

3 1

6 4

9 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 12

238

P.P. No. 3 16. Sensewa Gaon

Borpathar

241

Annual

242

Annual

243

Annual

244

Annual

245

Waste land

247

Waste land

250

P.P. No. 69

254

Waste land

255

Annual

256

P.P. No. 73

257

P.P. No. 64

273

P.P. No. 54

274

P.P. No. 54

275

Waste land

279

Waste land

280

P.P. No. 31

286

Waste land

301

P.P. No. 21

302

P.P. No. 21

304

P.P. No. 48

305

P.P. No. 48

306

P.P. No. 48

307

P.P. No. 22

308

Waste land

309

P.P. No. 65

310

Annual

Waste land

351

Total Area

17. No. I Premhara Gaon

Weste land

Borpathar

Total Area

30Yrs .

Borpathar

18. Pavajan Bagan

30Yrs .

Waste land

30Yrs .

30 Yrs .

30Yrs .

Total Area

267

19. No. 1 Tamuli Gaon

Waste land

Borpathar

268

Waste land

263

Waste land

262

Waste land

315

Waste land

347

Waste land

314

Waste land

Total Area

93 6

8 0

18 0

17 0

19 0

15 0

13 0

()

09 0

03 0

()

17 (0

()

(0)

17 0

04 (0

06 0

()

07 0

()

09 0

()

17 (0

()

02 ()

()

8 3

10 ()

(0)

16 0

09 0

()

04 2

()

6 4

()

15 (0

9 0

9 3

()

3 (0

()

19 94

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

Waste land 20. No. 2 Tamuli Gaon

Borpathar

Waste land

Annual

Waste land

P.P. No. 13

102

Waste land

103

Waste land

118

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 6

0 ()

17 ()

()

18 1

8 (0

()

17 (0

()

Waste land

119

P.P. No 21

156

P.P. No. 7

163

Waste land

164

Waste land

165

Waste land

166

Waste land

167

Annual

168

8 (0

11 ()

()

+ ()

()

9 ()

(0)

Waste land

351

Waste land

354

Waste land

363

Annual

()

9 (0

0 0

Waste land

P.P. No. 33

291

8 (0

()

(0)

()

Waste land

Total Area

172

Annual 21. Molhanitup Gaon ( 2nd Part ) Ghiladhari

177

P.P. No. 12

178

P.P. No. 9

180

()

(0)

13 ()

Waste land

198

P.P. No. 1

199

Waste land

200

Waste land

197

P.P. No. 11

174

16 1

7 ()

()

5 ()

P.P. No. 22

Total Area

P.P. No. 58

Ghiladhari

22. Kalujan Gaon

Waste land

P.P. No. 26

11 ()

()

18 ()

()

6 0

P.P. No. 66

()

P.P. No. 72

Waste land

P.P. No. 49 0

(

3 0

1 ()

17 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 1

5 Ghiladhari

107

P.P. No. 9 22. Kalujan Gaon

141

Annual

154

Waste land

155

P.P. No. 37

190

P.P. No. 27

201

Waste land

202

P.P. No. 30

204

P.P. No. 10

235

P.P. No. 12

242

P.P. No. 13

247

P.P. No. 35

189

P.P. No. 27

271

Waste land

272

P.P. No. 50

274

P.P. No. 31

289

P.P. No. 54

378

P.P. No. 55.

380

P.P. No. 72

387

Waste land

385

Waste land

Total Area

Waste land

Ghiladhari

23. Chakialting Gaon

Waste land

30Yrs . Patta

Waste land

Total Area

Ghiladhari

P.P. No. 92 24. Nugura Gaon

P.P. No. 35

P.P. No. 58

P.P. No. 32

P.P. No. 37

P.P. No. 84

P.P. No. 44

P.P. No. 14

P.P. No. 58

P.P. No. 100

P.P. No. 36

P.P. No. 35

109

P.P. No. 35

117

P.P. No. 35

120

P.P. No. 43

114

Waste land

122

Waste land

123

P.P. No. 43

124

186

P.P. No. 51

8 0

8 (0)

()

9 0

18 0

11 (0

7 0

11 0

()

13 0

()

6 (0

13 0

()

3 0

4 5

2 (0)

()

6 0

()

1 1

()

15 0

6 0

()

17 0

15 ()

()

11 0

18 ()

13 (0

6 (0)

17 ()

()

8 (0

(0)

()

9 0

18 (0)

()

18 0

0000

15 96

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926 1

Ghiladhari

187

P.P. No. 9 24. Nugura Gaon

188

P.P. No. 71

532

P.P. No. 84

524

P.P. No. 68

191

P.P. No. 3

198

P.P. No. 86

199

P.P. No. 68

200

Waste land

211

P.P. No. 89

212

P.P. No. 89

213

P.P. No. 111

214

P.P. No. 23

215

P.P. No. 107

216

P.P. No. 86

225

P.P. No. 107

345

P.P. No. 102

346

P.P. No. 83

348

P.P. No. 26

Total Area 25. Aitoniamiri Gaon

Ghiladhari

516

P.P. No. 75

480

498

P.P. No. 43

P.P. No. 2

468

P.P. No. 45

467

479

P.P. No. 49

539

P.P. No. 29

540

P.P. No. 29

449

P.P. No. 84

450

P.P. No. 62

458

P.P. No. 33

390

P.P. No. 76

P.P. No. 61

400

415

P.P. No. 69

254

P.P. No. 92

255

P.P. No. 77

272

P.P. No. 92

273

P.P. No. 46

277

P.P. No. 77

221

P.P. No. 11

223

P.P. No. 86

P.P. No. 73

250

Waste land

294

P.P. No. 94

309

P.P. No. 37

320

P.P. No. 99

321

P.P. No. 29

348

Waste land

349

P.P. No. 29

362

Waste land

390

P.P. No. 76 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

8 6

7 0

2 0

13 ()

18 0

()

8 ()

()

8 ()

()

18 (0

()

14 ()

()

15 ()

9 8

()

9 ()

(0)

()

8 ()

()

15 ()

()

9 ()

()

9 (0)

()

7 ()

()

9 ()

()

( )

()

( )

()

9 ()

()

8 (0

()

7 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 1

542

25. Aitoniamiri Gaon

Ghiladhari

P.P. No. 76

510

P.P. No. 75

502

P.P. No. 80

322

P.P. No. 53

511

Waste land

543

P.P. No. 43

555

P.P. No. 76

TotalArea

Ghiladhari

F.C. No. 1 26.Oating Grant

F.C. No. 1

101

F.P. No. 1

TotalArea

Ghiladhari

27.Gari Gaon

P.P. No. 143

Waste land

P.P. No. 131

P.P. No. 130

P.P. No. 80

162

Waste land

285

Waste land

293

P.P. No. 130

294

P.P. No. 138

295

P.P. No. 74

296

P.P. No. 70

P.P. No. 30

297

299

P.P. No. 138

300

P.P. No. 29

522

Waste land

523

P.P. No. 1

528

P.P. No. 30

529

P.P. No. 30

530

P.P. No. 3

533

P.P. No. 5

535

P.P. No. 41

534

P.P. No. 76

536

P.P. No. 120

537

P.P. No. 10

538

P.P. No. 42

539

P.P. No. 120

540

P.P. No. 41

541

542

P.P. No. 35

543

P.P. No. 22

P.P. No. 88

544

545

P.P. No. 74

546

P.P. No. 43

Total Area 3770 G1/04-13

97 6

8 0

9 0

18 0

11 0

0 0

15 0

7 8

2 1

()

12 0

()

+ 0

2 0

16 0

4 0

15 0

()

18 2

9 0

()

2 (0

()

11 0

6 (0

()

18 0

18 (0

()

9 (0

()

7 ()

+ ()

()

11 0

17 (0

()

6 (0

()

7 0

()

(0)

()

7 0

9 (0

2 4 98

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926 2

Waste land 28. Rupkalia gaon ( 1st Part) Athgaon

P.P. No. 81

1416

P.P. No. 81

121

P.P. No. 257

P.P. No. 64

P.P. No. 244

P.P. No. 257

P.P. No. 77

156

Westland

P.P. No. 245

P.P. No. 174

P.P. No. 310

P.P. No. 245

P.P. No. 221

P.P. No. 124

P.P. No. 202

P.P. No. 68

P.P. No. 203

P.P. No. 201

P.P. No. 10

Wast land

P.P. No. 203

Wast land

P.P. No. 203

P.P. No. 14

1338

P.P. No. 163

338

Waste land

P.P. No. 126

P.P. No. 20

P.P. No. 164

P.P. No. 68

P.P. No. 203

1388

P.P. No. 222

P.P. No. 224

P.P. No. 209

P.P. No. 24

P.P. No. 83

P.P. No. 153

P.P. No. 168

P.P. No. 14

TotalArea

29. Chakardhara Gaon

P.P. No. 7

Athgaon

P.P. No. 9

P.P. No. 199

1351

P.P. No. 241

213

P.P. No. 241 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 6

8 0

11 0

7 0

2 0

4 0

1 0

2 0

10 0

15 0

18 0

2 ()

9 0

0 0

17 0

18 0

15 (0

()

9 ()

()

18 0

()

3 0

15 0

8 0

6 0

()

17 7

19 10

()

4 0

6 (0

()

3 0

13 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 1

214

29. Chakardhara Gaon

P.P. No.48

Athgaon

216

P.P. No. 100

218

P.P. No. 24

219

P.P. No. 241

1356

Waste land

222

P.P. No. 25

229

P.P. No. 24

231

P.P. No. 23

236

P.P. No. 23

237

P.P. No. 196

238

Waste land

239

P.P. No. 101

240

P.P. No. 330

241

P.P. No. 100

242

P.P. No. 281

246

P.P. No. 282

400

P.P. No. 174

401

P.P. No. 260

402

P.P. No. 162

403

P.P. No. 411

407

P.P. No. 281

409

P.P. No. 1

412

P.P. No. 281

413

P.P. No. 112

415

Waste land

416

P.P. No. 5

419

P.P. No. 68

420

P.P. No. 112

421

P.P. No. 273

708

P.P. No. 112

709

Waste land

711

P.P. No. 247

712

P.P. No. 200

720

P.P. No. 303

721

P.P. No. 141

729

P.P. No. 303

742

P.P. No. 140

743

P.P. No. 140

746

P.P. No. 261

747

P.P. No. 201

1139

P.P. No. 117

1140

P.P. No. 118

1141

P.P. No.49

1143

P.P. No. 247

1144-

P.P.No. 264

1145

P.P. No. 202

1146

Waste land

1148

P.P. No. 263

1149

P.P. No. 118

217

Waste land

422

P.F. No. 173

ToralArea

8 0

15 0

7 0

3 0

14 0

9 0

6 0

13 0

15 0

4 0

9 0

8 0

6 0

9 0

7 0

9 0

18 0

9 0

()

18 0

9 0

8 0

11 0

15 0

19 0

2 0

1 0

13 0

()

16 0

2 0

+ 10

18 100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926 2

1060

Moukhowa

30. Benganakhowa Gaon

P.P. No. 145

1059

P.P. No. 145

1049

P.P. No. 170

1047

P.P. No. 68

1045

P.P. No. 235

1051

P.P. No. 133

1044

P.P. No. 69

1035

P.P. No. 69

1034

P.P. No. 123

1036

P.P. No. 68

1064

P.P. No. 284

1061

PP No. 201

1024

P.P. No. 178

1025

P.P. No. 248

1026

P.P. No. 25

1017

P.P. No. 272

1018

P.P. No. 26

1013

P.P. No. 31

1014

P.P. No. 272

1015

P.P. No. 26

977

P.P. No. 15

983

P.P. No. 11

980

West land

981

P.P. No. 3

982

P.P. No. 169

986

P.P. No. 223

987

P.P. No. 129

1087

Wast land

842

P.P. No. 38

843

P.P. No. 202

844

P.P. No. 42

850

P.P. No. 156

845

P.P. No. 120

849

P.P. No. 234

848

P.P. No. 202

847

P.P. No. 227

634

P.P. No. 42

635

P.P. No. 42

636

P.P. No. 223

637

P.P. No. 20

639

P.P. No. 161

649

P.P. No. 160

643

P.P. No. 188

642

P.P. No. 188

676

Waste land

628

P.P. No. 188

640

P.P. No. 188

627

P.P. No. 188

625

P.P. No. 18

254

P.P. No. 198 [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

8 0

()

15 (0

6 0

4 (0

13 ()

()

9 0

6 (0

8 0

6 0

(0)

13 0

()

2 0

4 0

11 0

6 0

9 0

15 0

()

6 0

2 (0

6 ()

0 0

()

11 0

7 0

2 0

13 ()

3 0

13 0

(0)

3 ()

()

2667 (0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 1

102

Moukhowa

P.P. No. 128 30. Benganakhowa gaon

103

Waste land

256

P.P. No. 80

257

P.P. No. 106

258

P.P. No. 228

242

P.P. No. 219

245

P.P. No. 219

243

P.P. No. 15

244

P.P. No. 15

101

P.P. No. 256

255

P.P. No. 85

108

P.P. No. 177

P.P. No. 256

100

P.P. No. 256

P.P. No. 184

641

P.P. No. 18

1016

P.P. No. 214

Total Area

Moukhowa

159

P.P. No. 17 31. Bengenakhowa grant gaon

1st Part

164

P.P. No.

165

P.P. No. 19

168

P.P. No. 18

163

P.P. No.

162

P.P. No. 16

169

P.P. No. 33

170

P.P. No. 20

171

Waste land

173

P.P. No. 35

174

Waste land

188

Waste land

189

P.P. No. 34

191

P.P. No. 34

194

P.P. No. 29

196

P.P. No. 29

2.15

P.P. No. 15

216

P.P. No. 5

214

F.C. No. 1

Total Area

Moukhowa

1525

PPNo. 144 32. Borphukanar Khat Gaon

1524

PP No. 322

1526

PP No. 144

1527

PP No. 322

1528

PP No. 317

1529

Waste land

1530

PP No. 322

1536

PP No. 317

1541

Grajing

1542

Waste land

101 6

4 0

7 0

15 0

12 0

6 0

11 0

4 0

8 0

9 0

2 0

8 (0

13 (0

8 1

6 (0

1 0

15 0

()

11 0

15 ()

9 (0

()

(0)

2 ()

4 0

()

6 (0

()

6 0

8 ()

()

9 0

()

11 (0

()

13 4

1 (0)

()

8 0

4 (0

18 0

()

9 ()

2 102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926 1

1544

Moukhowa

PPNo.230 32. Borphukanar Khat Gaon

1545

Waste land

1546

PPNo. 134

1415

PPNo.406

1414

PPNo. 297

1193

PP No. 430

1192

1191

PPNo. 442

1190

PPNo. 442

1189

PPNo. 442

1041

PP No. 153

1043

PP No. 42

1044

Waste land

1045

PPNo. 153

1047

PPNo. 73

650

Waste land

652

PP No. 284

653

Waste land

667

PPNo. 123

665

PP No. 460

660

PPNo. 284

501

PP No. 331

502

PPNo. 313

503

Waste land

101

PP No. 324

105

PP No. 117

104

PP No. 439

117

PPNo. 324

118

PPNo. 324

116

PPNo. 401

129

PPNo. 401

130

PPNo. 324

132

PP No. 324

131

PP No. 324

134

PP No. 241

135

PP No. 324

136

PP No. 241

664

PPNo. 284

1046

PPNo. 73

TotalArea

Mukhowa

33. Tarfat gaon

Waste land

PP No. 66

PP No. 281

PP No. 318

14 [PART II- SEC . 3( ) ] 6

8 0

12 0

17 0

$ (0

()

11 0

7 0

17 0

2 0

3 0

11 0

8 0

(0)

11 0

7 0

()

17 1

()

17 0

10 (0

9 (0

()

4 0

2 ()

()

6 ()

()

6 ()

8 (0

17 0

()

9 12

()

4 (0

()

17 ()

17 0

19 0

12 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

5 12

33. Tarfar Gaon-Conid.

PPNo. 238

Moukhowa

Waste land

PPNo. 192

PPNo. 67

PPNo. 315

Waste land

TotalArea

Waste land

Kacharihat

34. Gohain gaon

PPNo. 226

PPNo. 50

Waste land

PPNo. 80

PPNo. 35

PPNo. 264

PPNo. 152

PP No. 156

PPNo. 156

PPNo. 101

PPNo. 162

PPNo. 39

PPNo. 193

PP No. 156

Total area

990

Kacharihat

PPNo. 221 35. Kacharihat gaon

991

PPNo. 139

992

PP No. 186

993

PPNo.

890

PPNo. 302

PPNo. 88

882

Waste land

884

PPNo. 88

885

PPNo. 156

879

PPNo. 183

878

PPNo. 82

886

PP No. 26

599

Waste land

875

PPNo.

874

PPNo. 91

873

PPNo. 137

1358

PPNo. 88

603

PPNo. 23

618

PP No. 31

617

PPNo. 31

103

2 0

12 1

13 0

7 0

4 0

9 0

10-

2 0

13 0

18 0

14 0

13 0

9 0

15 0

15 4

2 0

15 0

3 0

1 0

()

15 0

()

4 0

6 0

11 10

15 0

2 104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1, 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926 1

5 35. Kacharihat Gaon

Kacharihat

619

PP No. 31

620

PP No. 31

616

PP No. 31

623

Waste land

1318

Nil

624

PP No. 308

612

PP No. 139

510

PP No. 115

1356

PP No. 93

508

Waste land

507

PP No. 57

506

PP No. 300

505

PP No. 265

503

PP No. Nil

504

PP No. 106

407

PP No. 41

393

PP No. 13

522

PP No. 300

1364

PP No. 241

399

PP No. 241

400

PP No. 241

401

PP No. 234

403

PP No. 241

404

PP No. 274

405

PP No. 106

408

PP No. 141

409

PP No. 156

412

PP No. 294

402

PP No. 121

291

PP No. 241

286

PP No. 311

287

PP No. 296

115

PP No. 69

117

PP No. 297

129

PP No. 297

131

PP No. 196

118

PP No. 187

119

PP No. 297

128

PP No. 32

126

PP No. 272

127

PPNo. 272

140

PP No. 283

141

PP No. 230

142

PP No. 230

139

PP No. 32

1335

Waste land

883

PP No. 23

605

Waste land

Total Area [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

8 0

10 0

0 0

15 (0

4 (0

13 (0

4 0

17 (0

8 0

9 (0

2 0

(0)

9 (0

1 0

2 0

4 (0

2 0

13 0

13 (0

()

18 0

()

8 ()

()

15 (0

5 (0

12 (0

3 (0

(0)

()

6 ()

()

11 (0

()

2 1

1 ()

()

3 (0

()

+ ()

()

3 ()

(0)

()

7 (0

()

5 ()

()

19 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926 12

Kacharihat

253

PP No. 266 36 RaideongiaGaon

252

PP No. 86

254

PP No. 266

256

PP No.. 395

257

PP No. 398

259

PP No. 82

262

PP No. 306

263

PP No. 39

264

PP No. 39

265

PP No. 306

266

105 6

8 (0

18 (0

2 (0

15 (0

()

14 0

(0 (0

19 (0

18 0

()

3 ()

2 ()

()

Waste land

267

PP No. 326

390

PP No. 263

391

PP No. 189

397

6 0

17 ()

PP No. 84

388

PP No. 80

387

PP No. 307

389

PP No. 443

411

PP No. 436

415

PP No. 307

416

PP No. 132

417

PP No. 2

418

PP No. 129

419

PPNo. 369

421

PP No. 132

422

PP No. 1

423

PP No. 305

424

()

2 0

5 0

12 0

10 0

16 0

2 0

10 0

6 0

13 0

7 0

PP No. 181

425

PP No. 303

426

PP No. 227

427

Waste land

428

PP No. 323

429

PP No. 321

430

PP No. 179

431

PP No. 449

432

PP No. 353

433

PP No. 203

PP No. 302

435

437

PP No. 60

438

PP No. 258

439

PP No. 303

440

PP No. 177

443

PP No. 209

445

PP No. 177

PP No. 392

446

447

PP No. 205

448

PP No. 205 3770 G1/04-14

13 0

8 (0

7 0

11 0

11 (0

()

8 ()

15 (0

10 ()

15 0

13 0

()

7 106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 12

8 Kacharihat

449

()

PP No. 92

4 35 Raidcongia Gaon-Contd .

450

()

PP No. 209

;

451

PP No. 600

452

()

PP No. 373

()

453

()

PP No. 70

()

454

(0)

PP No. 255

455

()

PP No. 154

()

456

PP No. 60

457

()

PP No. 60

458

()

PP No. 60

()

PP No. 301

160

()

459

PP No. 415

()

PP No. 256

461

462

PP No. 33

()

PP No. 414

463

PP No. 321

tot

()

PP No. 142

465

()

PP No. 254

400

()

PP No. 301

467

()

PP No. 9

468

()

PP No. 142

()

469

470

()

PP No. 255

()

471

PP No. 413

472

(0)

()

PP No. 413

473

()

PP No. 125

()

474

PP No. 144

475

()

PP No. 255

476

()

PP No. 322

477

()

PP No. 361

()

479

PP No. 226

478

()

PP No. 225

()

180

PP No. 205

()

PP No. 413

184

482

()

PP No. 124

483

PP No. 255

( )

()

484

()

PP No. 247

500

()

PP No. 361

501

PP No. 157

502

()

PP No. 366

497

PP No. 390

498

()

PP No. 394

495

()

PP No. 223

()

496

PP No. 390

560

()

PP No. 448

268

(0)

PP No. 77

559

()

PP No. 178

()

PP No. 392

976

()

Waste land

279

()

Waste land

556

()

PP No. 180

Total Area

[ F. No. O - 12016/ 7/2004 -ONGD - IVI N. C. ZAKHUP, Under Secy.

107 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2004

का०आ ० 42.- जबकि केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि जोरहाट और गोलाघाट शहर, जिला जोरहाट एवं गोला घाट को प्राकृतिक गैस आपूर्ति के लिये लाकुवा से गोलाघाट तक आसाम गैस कम्पनी लिमिटेड, दुलियाजान द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछायी जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित करती है । उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये आपत्ति और सुझाव सक्षम अधिकारी नामतः जिला उपायुक्त जोरहाट, असम को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकता है ।

और ऐसी आपत्ति और सुझाव देने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी बताएगा कि क्या वह अपनी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से चाहता है अथवा किसी विधि व्यवसायी के माध्यम से ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: असम सर्कल : टीयक

जिला: जोरहाट

मौजा

डाग नं.

गांव का नाम

पट्टानं.

बीघा

क्रमशः संख्या

क्षेत्रफल कट्टा लूसा

7 1

2454

लाहिंग

मियादी पट्टा नं . 171

1. हाथी मुरिया गांव

()

2453

द्वितीय भाग

मियादी पट्टा नं. 415

2432

मियादी पट्टा नं. 171

2433

मियादी पट्टा नं. 334

2434

मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

()

2337

मियादीपट्टा नं. 192

()

2338

मियादीपट्टा नं. 234

2318

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 234

2296

एकसाना

()

2298

एकसाना

(0)

2299

मियादी पट्टा नं. 411

2277

मियादी पट्टा नं. 407

()

2278

मियादी पट्टा नं. 407

()

2279

मियादीपट्टा नं . 411

2132

मियादीपट्टा नं. 364

2131

मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

()

2130

मियादी पट्टा नं. 362

()

2129

मियादी पट्टा नं. 51

()

2128

मियादीपट्टा नं. 528

()

2127

मियादीपट्टा नं. 82

(0)

2096

मियादी पट्टा नं . 254

()

2097

मियादी पट्टा नं . 407

2098

मियादी पट्टा नं. 257

108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

लाहिंग

हाथी मुरिया गांव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 364 द्वितीय भाग

मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

मियादी पट्टा नं. 51

मियादी पट्टा नं. 317

मियादी पट्टा नं. 178

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

मियादी पट्टा नं. 316

मियादी पट्टा नं. 365

मियादी पट्टा नं. Nil

मियादी पट्टा नं. 80

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं . 83

मियादी पट्टा नं. 534

मियादी पट्टा नं . ३60

मियादी पट्टा नं. 411

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

मियादी पट्टा नं . Nil

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

मियादी पट्टा नं. 36:

मियादी पट्टा नं. 87

मियादी पट्टा नं. 452

मियादी पट्टा नं. 139

मियादी पट्टा नं. 314

मियादी पट्टा नं. 503

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

मियादी पट्टा नं . 360

मियादी पट्टा नं . 51

एकासन

मियादी पट्टा नं. 392

लाहिंग

सरकार 2. दुलिया गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 29

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

मियादी पट्टा नं . 93

मियादी पट्टा नं. 92

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

2032

2031

1997

1995

1994

1972

1973

1938

()

1939

1940

1826

1828

1829

1830

1746

1755

1854

()

1834

1852

()

1851

()

1853

1855

()

1864

()

1863

()

1862

()

1827

()

1754

1746

()

1995

()

2315

()

1296

()

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 13

()

(0)

()

11 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

109 1

7 लाहिंग

दुलिया गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं. 71

मियादी पट्टा नं. 12

मियादी पट्टा नं. 31

मियादी पट्टा नं. 53

117

सरकार

241

मियादीपट्टा नं . 11

242

मियादी पट्टा नं. 74

254

मियादी पट्टा नं. 74

257

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

272

मियादीपट्टा नं. 91

276

मियादीपट्टानं. 74

277

मियादी पट्टा नं. 26

281

मियादी पट्टा नं . 91

291

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

292

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

300

मियादी पट्टा नं. 59

301

मियादी पट्टा नं . 80

302

मियादीपट्टा नं. 59

303

मियादी पट्टा नं. 17

312

सरकार

305

मियादी पट्टा नं . 80

457

सरकार

517

सरकार

कुल क्षेत्रफल 18

सरकार

03. टेंगाबोरियाँ गाँव

लाहिंग

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादी पट्टा नं . 13

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

सरकार

एकासना'

मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

एकासना

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 66

मियादी पट्टा नं . 66

110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 03 टेंगाबोरियाँ गाँव

लाहिंग

एकासना

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 5

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 53

एकासना 40

()

(0)

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 97

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

एकासना

एकासना 42

()

660

()

(0)

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 94

एकासना

मियादीपट्टा नं. 2 49

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 41

सरकार

सरकार 53

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 32

()

(0)

मियादी पट्टा नं. 45

मियादी पट्टा नं. 9

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 86

()

मियादी पट्टानं. 40

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 88

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 38

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 40

मियादी पट्टा नं. 78

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 68

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 27

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 16

मियादी पट्टा नं. 46

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 16

()

101

मियादी पट्टा नं. 17

04. सिलेंग ग्रांट

सरकार

लाहिंग

एफसी.

एफ. सी.

सरकार

एफ.सी

()

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 18

()

(0)

()

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 7 111

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7 2

183

15 05. देवघोरियाँ गाँव

लाहिंग

मियादी पट्टन नं. 34

185

मियादी पट्टा नं. 47

191

मियादी पट्टा नं. 63

()

192

मियादी पट्टा नं. 72

200

सरकार

201

1.3

सरकार

()

202

मियादी पट्टा नं. 73

203

सरकार

211

मियादी पट्टा नं. 73

212

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

268

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

274

मियादी पट्टा नं. 112

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

()

सरकार

()

मियादी पट्टानं . 34

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 34

()

मियादी पट्टानं. 40

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 70

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 103

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 5

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 36

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 59

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 34

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 34

()

मियादीपट्टा नं. 100

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 34

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 12

()

131

एकासना

()

132

मियादी पट्टा नं. 82

( )

()

133

एकासना

()

134

मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

()

135

सरकार

()

181

मियादी पट्टा नं .

324

मियादीपट्टा नं. 72

()

719

()

सरकार

642

सरकार

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 199

()

245

सरकार

190

मियादी पट्टा नं. 27

()

270

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

()

182

मियादी पट्टा नं . 43

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 30 112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

लाहिंग

सरकार 06. लोनपुरियाँ गाँव

मियादी पट्टा नं . 122

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

मियादीपट्टा नं. 135

मियादी पट्टा नं . 23

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

मियादी पट्टा नं. 64

मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

मियादी पट्टा नं. 64

मियादी पट्टा नं. 56

मियादी पट्टा नं. 136

मियादी पट्टा नं. 49

मियादी पट्टा नं. 22

मियादी पट्टा नं. 126

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं . 5

मियादी पट्टा नं. 6

Nil

सरकार

Nil

07. हेमलाय छा बागीचा लाहिंग

सरकार प्रथम भाग

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

[PART II SEC. 3( ii)] 5

277

276

599

319

320

348

354

381

382

391

394

395

398

353

399

430

431

487

485

()

486

393

488

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 10

(0)

()

541

536

535

503

450

(0)

550

()

540

539

()

549

551

()

490

449

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 21 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

लाहिंग

सरकार 08. हेमलाय छा बागीचा

द्वितीय भाग

सरकार

113 5

437

439

432

431

320

601

मियादीपट्टा नं . 150

602

मियादी पट्टा नं. 151

603

मियादीपट्टा नं. 152

604

मियादीपट्टा नं. 153

सरकार 0

610

606

मियादी पट्टा नं. 154

607

मियादीपट्टा नं. 155

सरकार

रेडीम-1 09. हूलौंगापार ग्रांट

हूलौंगापार

रेडीम-1

सरकार

रेडीम-1

सरकार

रेडीम-1

रेडीम-1 10. दादरुपार

हूलौंगापार

309

308

726

318

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 7

()

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 10

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

चाय बागीचा

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

सरकार

एकासना

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

3770 G1/04-15

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 13 114

[PART II - SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

11. गाबरु ग्रांट गाँव

नौ-कछारी

सरकार

प्रथम भाग

सरकार

(0)

सरकार

()

सरकार

308

सरकार

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 111

कुल क्षेत्रफल=

()

12. नौ-कछारी गाँव

नौ-कछारी

सरकार

()

प्रथम भाग

मियादी पट्टा नं. 10

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 94

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 76

मियादी पट्टा नं. 8

सरकार

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 2

623

मियादी पट्टा नं . 94

627

मियादी पट्टा नं. 90

631

सरकार

632

सरकार

414

415

सरकार

580

सरकार

()

सरकार

()

सरकार

(0)

()

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 36

सरकार

420

सरकार

()

423

सरकार

()

सरकार

621

620

सरकार

425

सरकार

381

581

सरकार

कुल क्षेत्रफल= [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

4 13. नौ- कछारी गांव

नौ-कछारी

115 5

322

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

द्वितीय भाग

सरकार

सरकार 0

321

320

317

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

315

मियादीपट्टा नं.3

313

मियादी पट्टा नं. 9

311

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

310

मियादी पट्टा नं. 9

309

(0)

मियादी पट्टा नं..9

308

मियादी पट्टा नं..9

307

मियादी पट्टा नं. 47

सरकार

एकासना 306

305

279

मियादी पट्टा नं. 35

149

मियादी पट्टा नं. 46

147

मियादी पट्टा नं. 85

सरकार 496

144

मियादीपट्टा नं. 92

सरकार

एकासना 497

143

105

103

मियादी पट्टा नं. 99

मियादी पट्टा नं. 63

148

मियादी 'पट्टा नं. 68

277

मियादी पट्टानं. 34

सरकार

सरकार 266

224

225

227

228

276

मियादी पट्टा नं. 11

278

मियादी पट्टा नं. 12

नौ-कछारी

सरकार 14. मैबालीया

चकीयाल गाँव

कुल क्षेत्रफल 15

मियादीपट्टा नं. 25

मियादीपट्टा नं. 92

मियादी पट्टा नं . 56

मियादी पट्टा नं. 154

116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 14. मैबालीया चकीयाल गाँव नौ- कछारी

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 5

मियादी पट्टा नं. 154

सरकार 18

मियादी पट्टा नं. 211

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 46

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 89

मियादी पट्टा नं. 57

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

एकासना

मियादी पट्टा नं . 93 27

842

886

मियादी पट्टा नं. 183

885

मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

805

मियादी पट्टा नं. 45

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93 0

891

887

मियादी पट्टा नं. 101

908

मियादी पट्टा नं . 154

मियादी पट्टा नं. 77

857

(0)

897

मियादी पट्टा नं. 46

15. देबरापार गाँव

नौ-कछारी मियादी पट्टा नं. 81

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 15

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 75

मियादी पट्टा नं. ४ ()

()

(0)

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 108

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 62

मियादी पट्टा नं. 14

मियादीपट्टा नं. 20 (0)

()

मियादी पट्टानं. 29

मियादी पट्टा नं. 67

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

(0)

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 93

मियादीपट्टा नं . 26 30

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 23

मियादी पट्टा नं. 22

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 65 33

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 15

मियादी पट्टा नं . 97 (0)

1 117 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

7 15. देबरापार गाँव

नौ-कछारी

मियादी पट्टा नं. 19

मियादी पट्टा नं. 100

मियादी पट्टा नं. 46

मियादी पट्टा नं. 8

मियादीपट्टा नं . 110

मियादी पट्टा नं. 52

मियादी पट्टा नं . 8

मियादीपट्टा नं. 32

मियादीपट्टानं. 45

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

मियादी पट्टा नं . 6

मियादी पट्टा नं. 119

मियादी पट्टा नं. 120

मियादी पट्टा नं. 118

मियादी पट्टा नं. 58

मियादी पट्टा नं. 52

मियादी पट्टा नं . 32

मियादीपट्टा नं. 52

मियादी पट्टा नं. 65

नील

मियादी पट्टा नं. 55

मियादी पट्टा नं. 126

मियादी पट्टानं . 103

मियादी पट्टा नं. 110

345

मियादी पट्टा नं. 42

मियादी पट्टा नं. 11

मियादी पट्टा नं. 17

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 44

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 15

3 नौ-कछारी

16. मोरान गाँव

593

मियादी पट्टा नं . 50

594

मियादी पट्टा नं. 99

()

572

मियादी पट्टा नं. 168

674

मियादी पट्टा नं. 155

607

मियादी पट्टा नं. 190

608

मियादीपट्टा नं. 190

कुल क्षेत्रफल =3 118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 17 तीरुवाल गाँव

नौ-कछारी

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 37

मियादी पट्टा नं. 50

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादीपट्टा नं. 52

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

मियादीपट्टा नं. 49

मियादीपट्टा नं. 7

मियादी पट्टा नं. 4

मियादीपट्टा नं. 54 18. 163 नं. ग्रांट

नौ-कछारी

सरकार

[PART II-- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

439

286

243

284

319

315

281

292

258

254

253

293

252

257

250

249

कुल क्षेत्रफल=72

132

672

()

677

678

()

679

()

680

681

()

682

683

684

685

()

686

687

688

689

690

711

772

713

()

714

() [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

4 18. 163 नं. ग्रांट

नौ-कछारी

सरकार

रेडेम-1

नौ-कछारी

19. काठलगुरी ग्रांट

रेडेम-1

सरकार

काटानी गाँव

सरकार

सरकार 20. मोरियोनी ग्रांट द्वितीय भाग

रेडेम

सरकार

119 5

715

716

717

718

719

720

721

722

723

724

725

726

671

729

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 13

143

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 5

159

158

157

417

140

141

142

483

482

()

139

156

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 5 120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 1

काटानी गाँव रेडेम-1 21. मोरियोनी ग्रांट

प्रथम भाग

रेडेम -1

रेडेम-1

रेडेम -1

रेडेम-1

रेडेम -1

रेडेम-1

रेडेम -1

रेडेम-1

सरकार

काटानी गाँव

सरकार 22 मोरियांनी टाऊन प्रथम एवं द्वितीय

सरकार

एफ.सी.आई.

सरकार

काटानी गाँव

सरकार

सरकार 23. खारीकाटायाँ ग्रांट तृतीय भाग

सरकार

एकासना-21

सरकार

एकासना-22

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 5

115

116

117

()

119

118

480

(0)

101

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 12

403

404

41/2

171/2

405

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 13

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

काटानी गाँव

23. खारीकाटीयाँ ग्रांट

एकासना

-जारी

तृतीय- भाग

121 5

141

142

मियादी पट्टा नं. 3

सरकार

सरकार 143

144

()

145

मियादी पट्टा नं. 6

सरकार

सरकार.

सरकार

एकासना-29

एकासना-17 146

147

() () 18.

()

148

() 2

149

150

151

(0 1 17

152

(0)

153

()

154

156

()

157

()

158

(0)

159

एकासना-20

()

160

एकासना -19

()

161

मियादीपट्टा नं. 2

() 1

163

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

()

164

एकासना-16

एकासना-23

सरकार

सरकार ()

165

167

(0 1

()

168

()

169

एकासना-18

सरकार

सरकार 170

()

171

()

172

एकासना-12

173

() 1

एकासना-12

सरकार ()

174

175

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

- 176

एकासना-24

एकासना-25

एकासना-26

सी. सी. ।

सरकार 3770 GI/04-16

()

177

()

178

()

179

166

()

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 14 122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

तीताबर

सरकार 24. बोकाहुला ग्रांट

सरकार

सरकार 25. धोनी चाय

नीताबर

सरकार

मियादी पट्टा नं . ।

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

सरकार

मरकार

सरकार

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

853

854

()

116

855

856

()

857

858

() 3 13

()

246

()

859

118

119

()

120

121

() 1 17

124

()

567

()

570

571

()

574

()

577

583

() 1

()

584

()

585

588

()

592

()

595

596

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 22

()

() 1

()

() ()

()

16 1/2

() ()

16 1/2 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) }

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौष 11 1926

4 25. धोली चाय

तीताबर

सरकार बागीची

सरकार

ADID

123 5

मियादी पट्टा नं . 1

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

377

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

376

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

2375

18.

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

()

374

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

373

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

()

--372

मियादी पट्टा नं. 1

तीताबर

सरकार

सरकार 26. खोरीकाटीयाँ ग्रांट तृतीय भाग

सरकार

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 11

()

379

()

380

396

397

()

407

()

408

412

()

413

414

()

427

428

()

मियादी पट्टा नं . 3

() 1

मियादी पट्टा नं . 4

()

मियादी पट्टा नं. 5

सरकार

सरकार 92

()

253

()

354

355

()

358

379

()

377

429

437

()

440

()

443

()

445 124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

सरकार

तीताबर

सरकार 26. खोरीकाटीयाँ ग्रांट तृतीय भाग

सरकार

तीताबर

मियादी पट्टा नं . 2 27. खोरीकाटीयाँ ग्रांट द्वितीय भाग

मियादी पट्टा नं. 2

सरकार

एफ. सी. 1

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] 5

447

448

452

451

कुल क्षेत्रफल= 19

116

117

118

119

120

1 18 1/2

180

110

126

()

128

(0)

463

()

464

469

()

462

()

470

()

481

()

482

()

466

()

467

()

468

()

(0)

469

()

454

()

(0)

458

()

459

()

561

562

(0)

()

51/2

कुल क्षेत्रफल = 24

[फा. सं. ओ-12016/7/2004/ओ.एन.जी.डी.- IV ]

एन. सी. जाखूप, अवर सचिव [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

125

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2004

S. O. 42.- WHEREAS it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for supply of natural gas to Jorhat and Golaghat towns in the districts of Jorhat and Golaghat , respectively in the State of Assam, Pipeline should be laid from Lakwa to Golaghat by Assam Gas Company Limited , Duliajan ;

AND whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land decribed in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

NOW, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares it intention to acquire the right of user therein.

2. ANY person interested in the said land may within 21 days from the date of this notification send objections and suggestions to the laying of the pipeline under the land to the competent authority, namely, the Deputy Commissioner , Jorhat District , Assam and such person may also State whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practitioner .

SCHEDULE

State- Assam

District - Jorhat

Circle- Teok

Mauza

PattaNo.

Name ofVillage

Sl. No.

4 2

PPNo. 171 01. Hatimuria Gaon Lahing

PP No. 415 2nd Part

PP No. 171

PPNo. 334

PPNo. 88

PP No. 192

PP No. 234

Annual

PP No.411

PP No. 407

PP No. 411

PP No. 364

PP No. 183

PP No. 362

PPNo. 51

PP No. 528

PP No. 82

PP No. 254

PP No. 407

PP No. 257

PPNo. 364

PP No. 183

PPNo. 80

'PP No .. 51

PP No. 317

PP No. 178

Area

DagNo.

2454

2453

()

2432

2433

2434

2337

2338

2318

2296

2298

2299

2277

2278

2279

2132

2131

2130

2129

2128

2127

2096

2097

()

2098

()

2032

()

2031

1997

1995

1994

1972

1 126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1, 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 01. Hatimuria Gaon

PP No. 24

Lahing

2nd Part

PPNo. 316

PP No. 365

PP No. Nil

PP No. 80

Waste land

PP No 83

PP No. 534

PP No. 360

PP No. 411

PF No. 26

PP No 26

PP No. Nil

PP No. 26

PP No. 365

PP No. 87

PP No. 452

PP No. 139

PP No. 314

PP No. 503

PP No. 26

PP No. 360

PP No. 51

Annual

PP No. 392

Waste Land

1.alung

(12 Dulia gaon

PP No. 29

Waste Land

PP No. 93

PP No 92

PP No. 71

PP No. 12

PP No. 31

PP No 53

Waste land

[PART I- SEC . 3 (ii) ] :

1973

1938

1939

1940

1826

1828

1829

1830

1746

1755

1854

1834

1852

()

1851

()

1853

()

1855

1864

()

1863

()

1862

()

1827

()

1754

( )

()

1746

()

1995

2315

()

り

()

1296

Total area = 13

()

( )

(}

()

117 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

1 2

4 02. DuliaGaon

PP No. 11

Lahing

PP No. 74

PP No. 26

PP No. 91

PPNo. 74

PP No. 26

PP No. 91

PP No. 3

PP No. 59

PP No. 80

PP No. 59

PP No. 17

Waste land

PP No. 80

127

241

242

254

257

272

276

277

281

291

292

300

301

302

303

312

305

457

Waste land

517

Waste land

Waste land 03. Tengaboria Gaon Lahing

Waste land

PP No. 1

PP No. 13

PP No. 1

Waste land Total area 18

()

(0)

()

Waste land

Annual (0

()

PP No. 66

Annual

PP No. 66

Annual

PP No. 53

Annual

PP No. 97

PP No. 1

Annual

Annual (0

()

(0)

()

660

()

() 128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

Annual 03 Tengaboria Gaon Lahing

Annual

PP No. 94

Annual

PP No. 2

PP No. 41

Annual

PP No. 32

PP No. 45

PP No. 9

PP No. 49

PP No. 86

PP No. 40

PP No. 88

PP No. 38

PP No. 40

PP No. 78

PP No. 68

PP No. 3

PP No. 27

PP No. 42

PP No. 16

PP No. 46

PP No. 16

PP No. 17

Waste land 04. Seleng Grant

Lahing

F. C.

F.C.

F. C.

F.C.

F. C.

F.C.

PP No. 34 05. Dewghoria Gaon Lahing

PP No. 47

PP No. 63

PP No. 72

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 5

()

101

Total area 18

()

Total area= 7

183

185

191

()

192

15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

129

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौप 11, 1926

Waste land 05 DewghoriaGaon Lahing

Waste land

PP No. 73

Waste land

PP No. 73

PP No. 35

PP.No. 112

PP No. 1

Waste land

PP No. 34

PP No. 40

PP No. 70

PP No. 103

PP No. 5

PPNo. 36

PP No. 59

PP No. 34

PPNo. 34

PP No. 100

PP No. 34

PP No. 12

Annual

PP No. 82

Annual

PPNo. 101

Waste land

PP No.

PP No. 72

Waste land

PP No. 199

Waste land

PP No. 27

PP No. 1

PP No. 43

200

201

202

203

211

212

()

268

274

()

017

131

()

132

()

133

134

() 11

135

()

181

324

( )

719

642

() 5

()

() 7

245

() 17

19)

()

() 18

270

()

10182

Waste land 06. Lunpuria Gaon Lahing

PP No. 122 377061/80-17

Total area = 30

()

277

276

1 130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 5

599

Waste land

06 Lupuria Gaon

Lahing

PP No. 49

PPNo. 135

PP No. 23

PP No. 35

()

6 .

319

320

()

348

()

354

381

PPNo. 64

382

()

PP No. 49

391

()

PPNo. 64

PP No. 56

PP No. 136

PP No. 49

PP No. 22

PP No. 126

Waste land

PP No. 5

PP No.

Nil ()

394

395

398

353

399

430

431

437

()

485

486

393

()

488

Waste land

Nil

Waste land 07. Hemlai Cha Bagicha Lahing

1 stPart

()

Total area 10

541

536

Waste land

PP No. 1

Waste land 535

503

450

Waste land

550

()

Waste land

()

540

Waste land

PP No. 1

PP No. 1 539

+ ()

549

() 17

551

(0) 10

()

490

449

Total area -21

()

Waste land

08. Hemlai Cha Bagicha Bagicha 2nd Part

437

439

Waste land

432

Waste land

()

431

Waste land

320

Waste land

()

601

PP No. 150

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

131

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

PPNo. 151 08. Hemlai Cha Bagicha Bagicha

2ndPart

PPNo. 152

PPNo. 153

Waste land 5

602

603

604

610

PPNo. 154

PPNo. 155

Waste land 909

607

309

308

Waste land

Redim- 1 (19. HulungaparGrant Hulungapar

do 1

726

318

Total area 7

Waste land

Redin- 1 61

Waste land

Redim-1

Redim- 1

Rodim- 1

PPNo. 1

Hulungapar

10. Daddrupar

PP No. 1 ChaBagicha

()

Total area 10

()

אן

PPNo. 1

אן

PP No.

1

PP No. 1

()

PPNo. 1

Waste land

Annual 4

()

PP No. 1

11. Gabharu Grant

Total area 13

り

Waste land

Na-Kachari

Waste land

Waste land 13

()

308

Waste land

PP No. 111

Na-Kachari

12. Na- Kachari

Total Area = 7

Waste land

PP No. 10 Gaon Isı part

Waste land

Waste land 1

1 132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

12. Na - Kachari

Na-Kachari Waste land

Waste land

9, Gaon Ist part

Waste land

PP No. 94

21:

Waste land

*Waste land

PP No. 76

PP No. 8

Waste land

PP No. 2

623

'PP No. 94

627

PP No. 90

Waste land

631

632

Waste land

414

Waste land

415

Waste land

580

Waste land

ركة

Waste land

PP No. 36

Waste land

420

Waste land

423

Waste land

621

Waste land

620

Waste land

425

Waste land

381

581

Waste land

(PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 0

()

13:

()

15"

Total Area =

322

Na-Kachari PP No. 3

13 Na- Kachari

321

Waste land

Gaon 2nd Par

320

Waste land

317

PP No.3

315

PP No.3

313

PP No.9

311

PP No.3

310

PPNo.9

309

PP No.9

308

PPNo.9

()

४

()

2 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005 /पौष 11 , 1926

4 13 Na- Kachari

Na-Kachari PP No.47 Gaon 2nd Part

133 5.

307

Waste land

Annual

PPNo. 35

PPNo.46

PPNo.85 306

4.9

305

279

149

147

496

Waste Land

PP No. 92

Waste land

144

497

143

Waste land

Annual

PP No. 99

PP No. 63

PPNo.68

PPNo. 34 105

()

103

()

( )

()

148

()

( )

277

()

266

Waste land

()

224

225

()

227

()

Waste land

PP No. 11

PPNo. 12 14 Maibalia

Na-Kachari

228

276

()

278

Total Area 15

()

Waste land

Chakial Gaon

PP No.25

PP No.92

PP No. 56 ()

PP No. 154

()

PP No. 154

Waste land

()

PP No. 211

()

Waste land

PP No.46 25

()

Waste land

PP No. 89

PP No. 57

PP No. 93

Annual

PP No. 93 31

()

( )

()

( )

842

()

PPNo. 183

PP No. 101

PP No.45

PP No. 93 886

885

()

805

()

{)

891

887

PP No. 101

908

PP No. 154

PP No. 77

PP No.46 857

()

897

()

Total Area 15 134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

Na-Kachari PPNo. 81 15 Deberapar gaon

PP No. 75

PP No. 8

PPNo. 108

PP No. 17

PRNo. 62

PP No. 14

PP No. 20

PP No. 29

PP No. 67

PP No. 93

PPNo. 26

PP No. 23

PPNo. 22

Annual

PP No 65

PP No. 15

PP No. 97

PP No. 19

PP No. 100

PPNo.46

PP No. 8

PP No. 110

PP No. 52

PP No. 8

PP No. 32

PP No. 45

PP No. 5

PP No. 6

PP No. 119

PP No 120

PP No. 118

PPNo. 58

PP No. 52

PP No. 32

PP No. 52

PP No. 65

Nil

PP No. 55

PP No. 126

PP No. 103

PP No. 110

PP No. 47

Waste land

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( i) | 5

()

(0)

()

(0)

()

259

(0 0

54769 15 + 17 135

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

4 12

Na-Kachari

345

PPNo.42

15. Deberapar gaon

PPNo. 11

PPNo. 17 (0

Waste land

PPNo.44

PPNo 50

Na-Kachari

16. Moran gaon

TotalArca 15

593

PPNo. 99

594

572

PP No. 168

674

PPNo. 155

G07

PPNo. 190

Na-Kachari

608

TotalArea = 3

Waste land

17. Tiruwal gaon

439

286

Waste land

PPNo. 37

PP No. 50 0

243

284

319

Waste land

315

Wasteland

PP No 1

PP No. 1 0

()

292

258

PP No. 52

254

Waste land

PPNo. 1

PPNo.49

PPNo. 7

PPNo 4 ()

253

293

252

257

()

250

249

PP No. 54

Na-Kachari

Total Area = 7

132

Waste land

18 163 No. Grant

-do-

672

677

678

()

679

680

681

(A32

683

684

()

685

686

687

()

688

689

690

10 136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 1 2

18. 163 No. Grant

Na-Kachari Waste land

-do-

do-

-do-

Na-Kachari Ridim- 1 19. Kathalguri Grant

do-

-do-

Waste land

Katani Gaon

20. Morioni Grant

Waste land

-do- 2nd part

Ridim

-do-

do-

-do-

Waste land

-do-

-do- 21. Morioni Grant

Ridim- 1

Katani gaon

-do- 1st part

-do-

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )]

711

712

713

714

715

716

717

718

719

720

(0)

721

722

723

724

725

726

671

729

Total Area = 13

()

143

()

Total Area = 5

()

159

158

157

417

()

140

()

141

142

()

483

()

482

()

139

()

156

()

(0)

Total Area = 5

()

115

116

()

117

()

119

()

118

()

1 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

Ridim- 1 21. Morioni Grant

Katani gaon

-do- 1st part

-do-

Waste land

Katani gaon

-do- 22. Morioni town 1st and 2nd part

-do-

F. C. 1

Waste land

-do-

-do- 23. Kharikatia Grant

137

480

-81

101

Total Area 12

403

404

17/2

405

Total Area 13

()

130

Waste land

Katani gaon

3rd Part

-do-

Annual -21

Waste land

-do-

Annual - 22

Annual

PP No. 3

Wasste land

-do-

PP No. 6 0

131

132

()

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

()

141

(0)

142

()

143

()

144

145

146

Waste land

-do-

Annual- 29

Annual - 17

()

147

148

149

150

()

151

()

152

()

153

154

156

(0)

157

(0)

158

()

159

Annual -20

160

Annual - 19

3770 1/04-18 138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

4 12

PPNo. 2

Katani gaon

23. Kharikatia Grant 3rd Part-contd .

PP No. 5

Annual- 16

Annual -23

Waste land

Annual- 18

Waste land

Annual - 12

Annual- 12

Waste land

PP No. 1

Annual- 24

Annual- 25

Annual-26

C. C. 1

Waste land

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

161

163

164

165

167

168

169

170

(0)

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

()

179

(0)

166

Total Area

Titabor

Waste land 24. Bokahula Grant

-do-

853

(0)

854

()

116

()

855

()

856

857

()

858

246

859

118

119

120

()

121

()

124

()

567

()

570

571

()

574

(0)

577

583

()

584

585

588

()

592

(0)

595

596

Total Area= 22 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

139

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

1 2

Titabor

Waste land

25. Dholi Cha Bagicha

PP No. 1

(0)

-do-

Waste land

-do-

(0)

-do-

(0)

-do-

16/2

Waste land

16%,

-do-

()

-do-

()

PP No. 1

-do-

377

376

-do-

375

374

-do-

373

-do-

372

Total Area= 11

26. Kharikatia Grant

Titabor

379

Waste land

10 3rd Part

380

-do-

396

-do-

397

-do-

407

-do-

408

-do-

412

-do-

413

-do-

414

427

-do-

428

-do-

PP No. 3

()

PP No. 4

PP No. 5

()

Waste land

-do-

(0)

253

354

()

-do-

355

-do-

3 140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

1 2

Titabor

26. Kharikatia Grant

Waste land 3rd Part- contd.

-do-

-do- 27. Kharikatia Grant

Titabor

PP No. 2 2nd Part

-do-

Waste land

-do-

F. C. 1

Waste land

-do-

F. C. 1

[ PARI II- SFC. 3 (ii) | 5

358

()

376

()

377

()

429

437

()

440

443

(0)

()

445

447

448

()

452

()

451

Total Area = 19

()

116

117

()

118

()

119

120

1 18 %,

()

180

110

126

()

128

()

463

()

464

469

()

462

()

470

()

481

482

()

466

467

468

469

454

458

459

(0)

()

561

562

()

Total Area= 24

512

[F. No. O - 12016/7/2004 -ONGD - IV]

N. C. ZAKHUP. Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

141

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1,2005/पौष 11,1926

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 43. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित्त में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद परियोजना हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, 16 कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास, गोपालपुरा बाईपास रोड, जयपुर -302018 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 142

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

अनुसूची

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

गाँव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर क्रम सं.

6 1

962

00 1. सुरपुरा

964(स.नदी)

968(स.नदी)

2. बागावासचौरासी

487(स.नदी)

491

488

489

485/1906

485(स.नाला)

563

755

564

754

753

750

752

751

758(स.रास्ता)

741

740

739

1011

1010 (स. रास्ता)

1009

1015

1016

1014

1017

1018

1019

1020

1043

20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

143

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

सं.

3 1

1041 बामावासचौरासी (जारी ...)

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

54 0

1110 (स. चारागाह)

1111 (स.चारागाह)

1112(स .रास्ता)

1103 0

42 0

1113(स.आबादी)

1121

1102 0

00 20

66 0

1115(स.रास्ता)

1114

1101

1099

1098

20 0

56 0

1540 (स.रास्ता)

1539

1136

1139

1536

1520

1519

1515

1514

151-2

42 0

37 0

20 0

82 0

24 0

1450 (स. नाला)

1212

12 0

1217(स. रास्ता)

1228

1226

1223

1224

1233

1332

1237

1336 0

60 0

59 0

20 0

25 144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

तहसील : विराटनगर

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

3 1

1238 2. बागावासचौरासी (जारी...

1240

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

6 0

97 0

1241 (स.नाला)

1239(स.नाला)

1254

1242

1253

766 3. बणीजोगियान

765

762

761 0

20 0

82 0

58 0

27 0

94 0

794(स.नाला)

439 4. चतरपुरा

440

444

443

442

448

449

452

451

450

423

424

422

426.

427 0

07 0

08 0

56 0

48 0

20 0

60 0

35 0

84 0

62 0

420(स.सड़क)

419

408

409

410

411

404 0

32 0

19 0

63 0

38 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

145

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : रावस्यान

जिला: जयपुर

खसरा सं.

गाँव का नाम

ਏ.

3 1

406 चतरपुरा (जारी...)

387(स.रास्ता)

388

390

391(स.माला)

389

381

362

363

363/604

369

368

367

333/612

333

334

326

326/622

327

263 5. धोबियावाला

261

260

275

276

277

279

280

284

181

175

180

176

173

147(स.भूमि) 3770 GIA -19

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

62 0

33 0

32 0

91 0

73 0

12 0

04 0

38 0

31 0

15 0

35 0

49 0

67 0

74 0

41 0

22 0

47 0

66 0

وں

81 0

83 0 146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

क्रम सं.

6 2

5. धोबियावाला (जारी... )

101

102

103(स.चारागाह)

104(स .चारागाह)

124(स.चारागाह)

105

106(स. चारागाह)

107 (स .चारागाह)

56 6. भाबरू

4177/4454(स.भूमि)

4176(स.भूमि)

4178/4455 (स.भूमि)

4178

4179(स.नाला)

4228/4458 (स. नदी)

4229

4226

4227

4215

4216

4212

4211

4210

4209

4208

4207(स.नाला)

4183

4182

4181

92 4- 147

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

3 1

4180 भाबरू (जारी...)

1257 लुहाकनाकलां

1256(स.नाला)

1255

1258

1259

1260

1261

1272

1262

1264

1264/1553

1271

1265(स.नाला)

1266/1581 (स. नाला)

1266

1269(स.रास्ता)

1190

1191

1186(स.नाला)

1185(स.नाला)

1185/1705

1184

1160

1161

1159

1127

1129 8. लुहाकनाखुर्द

1105

1106

1108

1104

1103

1102

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

48 0

95 0

70 0

84 0

65 0

41 0

25 0

45 0

20 0

52 0

23 0

28 0

46 0

75 0

96 0

20 0

13 148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य: राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

एयर वर्ग मीटर क्रम सं.

1101

लुहाकनाखुर्द (जारी... )

1096(स. चारागाह)

1095(स.चारागाह)

1094(स.आबादी)

1078/1561 (स . नदी)

1078

1082

1065/1560

1079 (स .नदी)

1080 (स.नदी)

1063(स.नदी)

1062

1064(स.नदी)

1065

318

317

316(स .रास्ता)

312

311

310

304

302

303

263

263/1564

262

260

259

257

255

256

253

254

252 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

149

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

का

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

251 लुहाकनाखुर्द (जारी...)

250

249

248

246

245

243

242

241

230

236

237

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर स्थर वर्ग मीटर 4

44 0

94 0

04 0

55 0

71 0

41 0

52 0

234(स.नाला)

238(स.जाला)

356 9. धुलकोट

357

360

359

351

361

350

362

348

335

333

330

324

325

323

321 0

72 0

64 0

69 0

33 0

27 0

75 0

43 0

27 0

63 0

322(स.नदी)

1757 10. सूरखपुरा

1759

1749

71 0

20 0

06 150

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

खसरा सं.

वर्ग मीटर क्रम सं.

एयर

6 1

1748

सूरजपुरा (जारी...)

10.

1744

22 11. बहादुरपुरा

1741

1743

1742

1545

1447

1550

1549

1554(स.रास्ता)

1572

1571

1570

1568

1569

1567

1566

1565

1562

1563

1564

34 12. जयसिंहपुरा

1486 (स.रास्ता)

1464

1465

1456

1457

1455

1454

1448

1447

1446

1434

1435

1170 (स.भूमि)

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

151

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौष 11,1926

तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

गाँव का नाम

खसरा सं.

क्रम सं.

3 1

1202 जयसिंहपुरा (जारी...)

12.

1213

1212

1211

1209

1225

1226

1228

1243

1241

1242

1244

1186 (स. रास्ता)

1245

1031

1028

1029

1025

1024

1023(स.चारागाह)

1260

1259

1268

978(सि.वि.नहर)

968

967

966(स.रास्ता)

963

947

949

962

960

951

952

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4

6 0

70 0

40 0

55 0

36 0

17 0

78 0

20 0

67 0

86 0

20 0

93 0

20 0

39 0

86 0

59 0

41 0

27 0

88 0

15 0

37 0

20 0

82 0

28 0

44 0

03 0

33 0

57 152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] तहसील : विराटनगर

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला: जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

क्रम सं.

खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

955

68 12. जयसिंहपुरा (जारी...)

956

854

1319/3002(स.चारागाह)

[फा . सं. आर-31015/58/2004-ओ.आर- II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004

S.O. 43.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

302018 ( Rajasthan ) .

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur, Competent Authority Mundra -Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 16 Krishaha Vihar , Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye- pass Road , Jaipur [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

153

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Khasara No. Sr. No Name of the Village

962 1. SURAPURA

Area

Are Sq.mtr .

Hectare

00 0

964(G/L River)

968(G/L River)

2. BAGAWASCHORASI

487(G/L River)

491

488

489 0

55 0

10 0

485/1906

91 0

35(G/L Nala)

563

755

564

754

753

750

752

751 0

16 0

94 0

82 0

32 0

35 0

73 0

758(G/L Carttrack)

741

740

739

1011

48 0

1010(G/L Cart Track)

1009

1015

1016

1014

1017

1018

1019

1020

1043 3770 G1/04-20

06 0

79 0

02 0

85 0

59 0

20 0 154

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

District : JAIPUR

Area

Hectare Are

Khasara No.

Sq.mtr .

Sr. No

Name of the Village

6 2

1041

BAGAWASCHORASI

1110(G /L Pasture)

(Contd ... )

1111 (G/L Pasture)

1112(G/ L Cart Track)

1103

1113 ( G/L Abadi )

1121

1102

1115 ( G / L Cart Track)

1114

1101

1099

1098

1540(G/L Cart Track)

1539

1136

1139

1536

1520

1519

1515

1514

1512

1450(G/L Nala)

1212

1217 (G/L Cart Track)

1228

1226

1223

1224

1233

1332

1237

1336 155 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

District : JAIPUR

Area

Are Sq.mtr .

Khasara No.

Hectare

Sr. No

Name of the Village

1238

2. BAGAWASCHORASI

1240

(Contd...)

1241 (G /L Nala )

1239(G/L Nala)

1254

1242

1253

766

3. DHANI JOGIYAN

765

762

761

794(G/L Nala)

439

4. CHATARPURA

440

444

443

442

448

449

452

451

450

423

424

422

426

427

420(G/L Road)

419

408

409

410

411

404 156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

District : JAIPUR

Area

Hectare Are

Sr. No

Khasara No.

Sq.mtr. Nameof the Village

406

4. CHATARPURA ( Contd ... )

387( G / L Cart Track)

388

390

391(G/L Nala)

389

381

362

363

363/604

369

368

367

333/612

333

334

326

326/622

327

263

5. DHOBIYAWALA

261

260

275

276

277

279

280

284

181

175

180

176

173

147(G/L)

157

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/ पौष 11,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Sr. No

Khasara No. Name of the Village

87 5. DHOBIYAWALA ( Contd ... )

101

102

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

51 0

20 0

68 0

88 0

83 0

103(G /L Pasture)

34 0

104(G /L Pasture)

124(G/L Pasture)

105

20 0

76 0

106( G /L Pasture)

107(G/L Pasture)

6. BHABARU

4177/4454(G/L)

4176(G/L)

4178/4455(G/L)

4178

41 0

4179(G/L Nala)

37 0

4228/4458 (G /L River)

4229

4226

4227

4215

4216

4212

4211

4210

4209

4208 0

20 0

44 0

03 0

4207(G /L Nala)

4183

4182

4181 0

91 0

11 158

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

District : JAIPUR

Area

Khasara No.

Sr. No

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. Nameof the Village

4180

48 6. BHABARU ( Contd ...)

1257.

7. LUHAKANA KALAN

1256( G /L Nala)

1255

1258

1259

1260

1261

1272

1262

1264

1264/1553

1271

1265(G/L Nala)

1266/1581(G /L Nala)

1266

1269(G/L Cart Track)

1190

1191

1186(G/L Nala)

1185(G/L Nala)

1185/1705

1184

1160

1161

1159

1127

1129

8. LUHAKANA KHURD

1105

1106

1108

1104

1103

1102 159

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Sr. No

Khasara No. Nameof the Village

1101 8. LUHAKANA KHURD

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

6 0

41 0

1096(G/L Pasture)

(Contd ...)

1095 (G /L Pasture)

1094(G/L Abadi)

1078/1561(G /L River)

1078

1082 0

20 0

1065/1560

1079(G/L River)

1080(G/L River)

1063(G/L River)

1062 0

29 0

1064(G/L River)

1065

318

317 0

20 0

00 0

316(G /L Cart track)

312

311

310

304

302

303

263 0

49 0

37 0

81 0

00 0

263/1564

262

260

259

257

255

256

253

254

252 0

05 0

18 0

25 0

68 0

20 0

91 0

06 160

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

State : RAJASTHAN

District : JAIPUR

Area

Hectare

Khasara No.

Sr. No

Are Sq.mtr .

Name of the Village

6 1

251

250

44 8. LUHAKANA KHURD (Contd...)

249

248

246

245

243

242

241

230

236

237

234(G/L Nala)

238(G/L Nala)

9. DHULKOT

356

357

360

359

351

361

350

362

348

335

333

330

324

325

323

321

322(G/L River)

10. SURAJPURA

1757

1759

1749

1748

11. BAHADUR PURA

1744

22 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11,1926

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

State: RAJASTHAN

District: JAIPUR

Sr. No

Khasara No. Name of the Village

1741 BAHADURPURA

11.

1743 (contd.)

1742

1545

14-47

1550

1549

Ares

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4

15 0

04 90 0

60 0

98 0

79 0

54 0

1554(G/L Cart track)

1572

1571

1570

1568

1569

1567

1568

1565

1582

1563

1564 12. JAISINGHPURA

28 0

20 0

07 0

59 0

03 0

20 0

79 0

34 0

1488(G/L Cart Track)

1464

1485

1456

1457

1455

1454

1448

1447

1446

1434

1435

71 0

80 0

02 68

73 0

20 0

53 0

26 0

1170(G/L)

1202

1213

1212

1211 3770 G1/04-21

34 0

70 0

0 162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : VIRATNAGAR

District : JAIPUR

Area

Are

Khasara No.

Hectare

Sq.mtr. Sr. No Nameof the Village

1209

JAISINGHPURA ( Contd...)

12.

1225

1226

1228

1243

1241

1242

1244

1186(G/L Cart Track)

1245

1031

1028

1029

1025

1024

1023(G/L Pasture)

1260

1259

1268

978(Irrig. Deptt. Canal)

968

967

966(G/L CartTrack)

963

947

949

962

960

951

952

33 68

955

956

854

1319/3002(G /L Pasture)

[No. R-31015/58/2004-O.R. - II ]

HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

163 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

श्रम मंत्रालय

The point runs as hereunder:

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम्बर , 2004

"Whether the action of Telecom Assistant Engineer Phones ( Installation ) Saharanpur in terminating Sh ..Amar Singh S/o Sh. Shiv Charan Singh from service w.e.f. 14-5-91 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief is the workman entitled to " ?

का. आ. 44.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल.-40012/10/92- आई. आर. (डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2004

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman was appointed as mazdoor in group - D under the O.P./ management on and w.e.f. 25-10-86 (F.N) on permanently clearvacant post but he was kept as casual labour on daily rate ofwages payable monthly though he was doing work similar to that of regular workers. That the workman was issued an identity card as per rules and his days of working in each month were duly entered therein monthwise by the authorities concerned.

That the workman was given motivated artificial breaks intermittently by whim fancy and sweet will of the officers concerned to break the continuity in service on record and to deprive the workman of his legitimate right ofabsorption in permanent employment.

S.O. 44. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/92) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Telecom Deptt . and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-12-2004.

[No. L-40012/10/92 - IR(DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

That during the course of his employment a landmark decision was given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 27-10-87 in the case of DAILY RATED CASUAL LABOUR EMPLOYED IN P & T DEPARTMENT v/s UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS : 1988 SCC (L & S) 138 wherein it was held :

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

L D. NO. 69/92

R. N. Rai , PRESIDING OFFICER

In the Matter of:

( 1) "Labour law-pay-equal pay for equal work -daily rated casual labourers in P & Tdepartment doing work similar to that of regular workers of the department held entitled to minimum pay in the pay scale of the regular workers plus D.A. but without increments from the date of filing writ petition before Hon'ble Supreme Court- Constitution of India, articles 14 , 16,38 (2) , 39(d) and 32- International covenant on economic Social and Cultural Rights 1966 articles 7-casual workmen

Sh . Amar Singh , S/o Sh . Shiv Charan Singh, Village Roshanpur Jageer , P. O. Hassupura, (Distt. Bijnor) Pin -246727

(2) Labour law-absorption - daily rated casual labourers in P &T departiment doing work similar to that of regular workers of the department scheme directed to be made for absorption of casual labourers continuously working in the department for more than one year . " VERSUS

TheAsstt. Engineer Phones (Installation) , Telephone Exchange , Mission Compound, Saharanpur - 247001 .

AWARD

That in compliance with the said decision the O. P./Management revised the wages that were being paid to the workman in accordance therewith but he was not absorbed in regular employment as was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court though the workman made repeated requests to the management .

That the workman continued as such at the mercy of the O. P./Management till March 1991 in that he has The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L-40012/ 10/92 IR-(DU) Central Government dt . 07-8-1992 has referred the following point for adjudication.

164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

concerned of the O. P./Management did not make entries for the periods of service w.e.f. 15-4-91 to 30-4-1991 and from 1-5-91 to 14-5-91 in the Identity Card as per rules and for the same period the workman has not been paid his settled and earned wages till date .

had been making requests time and again for his permanent absorption but with no fruitful results . After March 31 , 1991 the workman was again given an artificial break though the work was there in that muster roll No. 16/056777 under work order No. 69 was issued for four boys on 15-4-91 till 30-4-91 and the workman worked on that muster roll and continued thereafter without any break.

That termination of the workman on and w.e.f. 14-5-91 A. N. without complying with the prerequisites of Section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is ' ąb initio' void and ` non - est ' in the eyes of law hence inoperative in consequence whereof the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with fullback wages .

In the meantime the workman requested the O. Ρ. / Management verbally for giving him the status of temporary employee and bring him on monthly rate of pay in view of the scheme framed by the department in compliance with the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 27-10-87 as the workman is entitled to the benefits of the said scheme .

That the O. P./Management did not relish the lawful request of the workman and the infuriated Assistant Engineer Phones acted vindictively in that he discriminated against the workman while disbursing wages on 5-5-91 in that he paid wages to workman's three colleagues and did not pay wages to the workman for the period 15-4-91 to 30-4-91 despite his repeated requests .

That the O. P./Management has also violated the provisions of Section 25 -G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in that the O. P./Management has terminated the services oftheworkman in departure from the well settled rule of " LAST COME FIRST GO" and had not followed the procedure for retrenchment in terminating the services ofthe workman on and w.e.f. 14-5-91 A. N. and retaining his juniors in service who are still working under the management in consequence where of the termination of the workman is ' ab initio ' void and ' non -est ' in the eyes of the law hence inoperative on this count too and the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with full back wages .

That on 14-5-91 A.N. at the close of work the Assistant Engineer incharge told the workman verbally that his services stand terminated with immediate effect and that he should not report for duty on next date i.e. on 15-5-91 .

That the workman reported for duty continuously for more than 10 days thereafter but neither he was given work nor payment of his wages for the period from 15-4-91 till 14-5-91 was made of him despite his repeated requests.

That the workman had not been paid his settled and earned wages for the period w.e.f. 15-4-91 to 30-4-91 and from 1-5-91 to 14-5-91 till date . On this count too the termination of the workman is ' ab initio ' void and 'non-est' in the eyes of law hence inoperative and the workman is entitled to a declaration for continuation in service with full back wages. The contention of the workman is supported by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S. G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Employees Union V/s . S. G. Chemicals and Dyes trading Ltd. and another : 1986 ( 52 ) FLR 661 where in it was held:

That the termination of the services of the workman on and w.e.f. 14-5-91 A.N. by the O.P./Management without any notice without any wages , in lieu of notice without any opportunity and/or any show cause notice and/or any chargesheet and so much so without issuance ofany letter oftermination ofhis services assigning therein reasons therefore.

"wages as per settlement not paid -effect - workman to be treated as still in service ... ." . In view of the foregoing it is proved beyond any shadow of doubt that the action of the Telecom Assistant Engineer Phones (Installation) , Saharanpur in terminating the services of the workman concerned in the instant case Sh . Amar Singh S/ o Sh . Shiv Charan Singh w.e.f. 14-5-91 A. N. is illegal and unjustified and the workman is entitled to all lawful relief in consequence thereof.

It istherefore respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to hold that the termination of the workman concerned Sh. Amar Singh by the Assistant Engineer Phones ( Installation ) , Saharanpur from service w.e.f. 14-5-91 A. N. is illegal That the workman has completed 342 days service in the first block of 12 consecutive months starting w.e.f. 25-10-86 , 354 days service in the third block of 12 consecutive months starting from 25-10-88 and 301 days inthe fourth block of 12 consecutive months starting w.e.f. 25-10-89 . The workman has completed 280 days service inablock of 12 consecutive months immediately preceding the date of termination/retrenchment i.e. 14-5-91 backward till 15-5-90 in that the workman was travelling within the protective harbour of Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 throughout his employment . It is imperative to mention here that the infuriated officer [ भाग II- खंड 3( ii) ]

and unjustified and further hold the workman entitled to the following reliefs :

(1) Reinstatement in service retrospectively w.e.f. 14-5-91 Α . Ν . with full back wages and continuity in service without any break or stigma in any manner whatsoever;

(2) Conferment of temporary status to the workman under the" casual labourers (grant of temporary status and regularisation ) scheme of the department of telecommunications 1989" which effect from the date it was made applicable to his counterparts under the department; (3) Payment of wages for the periods shown as artificial breaks in the course of the employ- ment;

(4) Interest on all arrears at market rate because it was the management who kept the workman illegally and malafidely out of employment to compensate the mental torture and agony that the workman has suffered and is suffering on account of the cruelty of O. P./Management .

The management/ respondent has filed WS. In the WS it has been submitted that the points raised by the said casual labour- Sh . Amar Singh in his application dated 23-9-92 are given below :-

( 1 ) Not admitted. The petitioner was engaged as casual labour on purely casual basis . As he says that he was appointed as a mazdoor in group D on 15-10-86 against permanent clear vacant post he should produce the copy of the appointment letter in support of his statement.

(2) No such identity card was ever issued to the said casual labour. The copy of the labour card so called identity card does not bear the signature of the issuing authority. Further it also does not bear the signature of disbursing authority who is not below the rank of gazetted officer. Therefore it cannot be taken as authentic.

(3) Not admitted. He worked continuously upto 30-4-91 thereafter he left the job on his own accord.

(4) (i) & (ii) No comments.

(5) As the petitioner does not fulfil the conditions of the regularisation rules so he can not be absorbed in the Deptt. on the regular basis .

(6) Same as against item No. 5 above .

(7) The petitioner left the job and did not turn up after 30-4-91 even för receiving his wages for April '91 , so his wages was sent by service money order on his permanent home address which was

165

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौत्र 11 , 1926.

returned unpaid by the post office with remark "ADDRESSEE NOT MET" . Therefore the question of discrimination in disbursing his wages does not arise.

(8) Not admitted . He never turned up after 30-4-91.

(9) As the petitioner did not turned up on the job after 30-4-91 the question of payment ofwages from 1-5-91 to 14-5-91 does not arise and the wages for 15-4-91 to 30-4-91 was sent to him by service M.O. as already mentioned in item- 8 above.

(10) It has already been held that the Telephone Deptt . is not an Industry within the meaning of Section (2) (j ) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and as such the provisions of Section 2 ( oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have not been violated.

( 11) Not admitted. He left the job after 30-4-91 on his own accord and did not turn up after this date.

(12 & As the petitioner did not turn up after 13 ) 30-4-91 there is no question of payment ofwages for the period 1-5-91 to 14-5-1991 to 30-4-91 . It has already been stated in item No. 8 above . As regards the violation of the provisions of the Section 25F of I. D. Act, 1947 it is stated that the Telephone Deptt . is not an Industry within the meaning of Section 2(j ) of I. D. Act, 1947 according to the judgement given by the Central Administrative Tribunal Allahabad Bench in the writ petition No. 061 of 1983 ( a photocopy enclosed) so the question of violation of the said provisions does not arise .

(14) The provision of Section 25 (G) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have not been violated because the petitioner left the job himself.

(15) As the petitioner has not worked during 1-5-91 to 14-5-91 the question of payment of wages for the period does not arise.

Inthis connection it is also stated that the Telephone Department is not an Industry within the meaning of Section 2(j ) of I. D. Act , 1947. Consequently it follows that the petitioner was neither workman nor any question arises of violation of Section 25F of I. D. Act , 1947. In this regard a copy of the judgement of Central Administrative Tribunal , Allahabad Bench in a writ petition has been attached herewith as stated in item No. 12 & 13 above ..

Inthe written statement, the management has denied almost all the paragraphs of statement of claim and has stated that the workman applicant has left the service himself and the management is not an industry.

166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SBC. 3 ( ii) ]

Hon'ble Supreme Court has also held that the management should follow the principles of last come-first go. As such , itis a settled law. According to the judgement of the Supreme Court in SG Chemicals , 1986 (52) , FLR 661 , the workman is entitled to get the wages of a permanent workman.

It was submitted by the learned counsel of the workman applicant that he has served the department for almost 7 years , juniors to him have been given temporary status and temporary appointment . From perusal of the order, it transpires that the management agreed to give casual work to the workman applicant, as such, it was admitted by the management that he has worked for 7 years and he experienced in work . The management has not followed the law laid down by the Apex Court in 1988 SCC page 138 and 1986 (52) FLR 661 and the settled law the management should follow the principles of last come first go . The workman has retained the juniors as is apparent from the discussion above . The management has not followed the principles laid down in the cases referred to above . He was senior so he should be first given temporary appointment and thereafter juniors to him shouldbe appointed but the management in utter disregard ofthe settled law has removed the workman from his work inview ofthe decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court cited above . The workman applicant deserves to be regularised on the wages of a permanent employee since the initial date ofhis engagement . The law cited by the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case.

The workman applicant is a class -D employee , he is a labour so it cannot be presumed to be sitting idle, as such , 75 % back wages are sufficient to meet the ends of justice.

The reference is replied thus :

The action of Telecom Assistant Engineer Phones (Installation) Saharanpur in terminating Sh . Amar Singh S /o Sh . Shiv Charan Singh from service w.e.f. 14-5-91 is neither legal nor justified. The workman applicant deserves to be regularised from the initial date of his engagement i.e. 25-10-1986 with 75% back wages . The management is directed to regularise the services of the workman applicant alongwith 75% back wages w.e.f. 14-5-1991 and pay him the entire back wages within one month from the publication of the award . In case ofdefault, the workman applicant will be entitled to an interest of 20% per annum from the date when the back wages become due.

The award is given accordingly.

Dt . 23-11-04

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has stated that he did not leave the work. He was ready to work but he was not given any work so he filed the ID case . The management is an industry and the workman is entitled to be regularised. He has reiterated the remaining averments of his statement of claim. None is turning up for a long time despite knowledge . Perused the papers on the record. The management has cited a judgement of the Central Administrative Tribunal , Allahabad Bench and asserted that the management is not an industry. This Tribunal is not bound by the award of the Central Administrative Tribunal . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in 1997 SCC 767 and telephone department is an industry in view of the judgement of the Supreme Court , no other judgement of the lower court will prevail, as such , in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court , that telephone department is an industry there is no force in the argument of the learned counsel of the management . According to the judgement oftheHon'ble Apex Court , the management is an industry. The work is of perennial in nature as telephones are regularly installed. It was argued from the side of the management that the workman applicant has left the work himself and payment to him was made at his address but that was returned as he was not available on his address . The workman applicant has filed this ID case in 1992 . He was removed from service on 14-5-1991 so it cannot be said that the workman applicant left the service himself. In order to create an evidence , his wages may have been sent on a different address to prove that he abandoned the work himself. An employee who files the case just after his dismissal or his services are terminated cannot be said to have abandoned his claim . The management has admitted that the workman applicant has worked from 25-10-1986 to 14-5-1991 . As such , he has worked for more than 240 days in the last preceding year and he has served the department for more than seven years .He has put his signature in April, 1991 as is evident from the paper annexed with the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman that Shri Ram Khelwal was ontemporary basis appointed on 17-8-1989 and another person Shri Rajinder was also appointed on temporary basis on 17-8-1989 whereas the workman was serving the department from 25-10-1986. It indicates that juniors to him have been given temporary appointment whereas the workman applicant was refused work. The two persons were appointed vide letterdt. 2-1-1990 . As such , it is an admitted fact that juniors to the workman applicant have been appointed whereas he has not been given work . There is no force in the argument of the management that the workman applicant has left the work himself. I perused the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Supreme Court in case of daily rated casual labour in Post & Telegraph Department Vs. Union of India and others , 1988 , SCC 138, the Hon'ble Court has directed that those who have served for more than one year should be absorbed . The [भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

167

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 45.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोलाम के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/161/2001- आई. आर. (डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd December, 2004 S.O. 45. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal , Kollam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Telecom Deptt . and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 3-12-2004.

[No. L-40012/ 161 /2001 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , KOLLAM

(Dated, this the 8th day of November 2004) PRESENT:

Sri . C.N. Sasidharan Industrial Tribunal

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 35/03

BETWEEN

The Chief General Manager , BSNL, O/of the Chief General Manager , Kerala Telecom , Trivandrum .

Management (By Sri R. Suresh , Advocate , Trivandrum)

AND

Union 1. The Circle Secretary, Bharatiya Telecom Administrative Offices Employees Union , Class III & IV, Kerala Circle , O/of the Chief General Manager, Trivandrum.

2. The Circle Secretary, Bharatiya Telephone Employees Union, Class III , Kerala Circle , O /of the Chief General Manager, Telecom , Kerala Circle, Trivandrum .

Union 3. The Circle Secretary, Bharatiya Telephone Employees LS& CL IV, O/ of the Chief General Manager , Telecom, Kerala Circle , Trivandrum.

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, by Order No.L-40012/ 161/2001 /IR(DU) dated 28-9-2001 , have referred this industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

The issue for adjudication is the following:

"Whether the action of the management ofBharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Kerala Circle in not implementing the restructured Scheme in respect ofSr. Telecom Operating Assistants in Kerala Circle with retrospective effect though it was implemented inall other Circles isjustified ? If not, to whaf relief the workers involved are entitled to ?"

2. In answer to notice issued from this Tribunal both sides entered appearance and filed statements advancing their respective contentions . Thereafter, while the case was pending for production of records , the management remained absent consequently on two posting dates . Hence the management was set exparte on 17-8-2004 .

3.The Circle Secretary of the contesting union has filed an affidavit subsequently in support of the case of the union and produced supporting documents which have been marked as Exts . W1 to W5 .

4. The averments of the circle secretary in his affidavit are briefly as below : The modern technology was introduced in the Department of Telecom at a very fast rate and the restructuring of cadres was also initiated from the year 1990 by Ext . W1 letter dated 16-10-1990 of the Department of Telecommunications , Government of India . Posts in the re - structured cadres were formed automatically by conversion of the pre restructured cadres and the ratio was 2 : 1 vide Ext . W2 letter of the Department ofTelecommunications dated 16-10-1993 . As perExt.W3 letter of the said Department dated 31-8-1994 , all officials who were to be granted officiating/adhoc promotion subject to the condition that they were actually working in the new technology area as specified in Ext . W4 letter ofthe said Department dated 2-8-1994 . The Senior Telecom Operating Assistants Scheme which was introduced from 16-10-1990 on all India basis , was introduced in Kerala Telecom Circle from 9-9-1992 . Though the employees who were working in Civil and Electrical Wing of Kerala Circle were given Senior Telecom Operating Assistants promotion from 9-9-1992 , similarly placed Administrative, Traffic and Engineering employees were not given the promotion . The Senior Telecom Operating Assistants Scheme applicable to , on all India basis was extended to the Administrative, Traffic and Engineering Employees in Kerala Circle at first only 168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

on 31-12-1996 . It is in violation ofExt . W3 order wherein officials who were performing the duties as restructured cadres were to be granted officiating/adhoc promotion if they were actually working in new technological area as specified in Ext . W4 letter dated 2-8-1994. The Administration , Traffic and Engineering Employees of the Kerala Circle were given officiating promotion as Senior Telecom Operating Assistants w.e.f. 1-1-1994 notionally. But actual benefits were given only from 1-10-2000 . The action of the Chief General Manager Telecom in denying the benefits to the Senior Telecom Operating Assistants is unilateral , arbirary and is against the direction given from the Department . Those operating assistants in Kerala have been discriminated . They are therefore entitled to get the benefits of the said restructured scheme.

5. The above averments supported by Exts . W1 to W4make it clear that the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. is not at all justified in not implementing restructured scheme in respect of Telecom Operating Assistants in Kerala Circle with retrospective effect . Therefore they are entitled to get the benefits as claimed by them.

Anaward is passed accordingly.

C.N. SASIDHARAN , Industrial Tribunal

APPENDIX

Documents marked on the side of the workmen Ext.W1 . Letter No. 27-4/87 -TE II ( 3 ) dated 16-10-1990 from the Department of Telecommunications, New Delhi .

Ext . W2 . Letter No. 27-48770- TE II(3 ) dated 16-10-1993 from the Department of Telecommunications , New Delhi .

Ext. W3 . Letter No. 27-2/ 94- TE ( 11) ( IV) dated 31-8-1994 from the Department of Telecom- munications , New Delhi .

Ext. W4 . Letter No. 27-10/ 93 -TE II dated 2-8-1994from the Department of Telecommunications , New Delhi .

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 46.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंस्टिट्यूट ऑफ होटल मैनेजमैंट एण्ड केटरिंग टेक्नोलॉजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोलाम के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -42012/262/2000- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 3rd December, 2004 S.O. 46. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal , Kollam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Institute of Hotel Management and Catering Technology and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-12-2004 .

[No. L - 42012/262/ 2000 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , KOLLAM

(Dated, this the 10th day of November, 2004) PRESENT :

Sri C. N. Sasidharan , Industrial Tribunal IN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 14/2001 BETWEEN

ThePrincipal, Institute ofManagement and Catering Technology, G. V. Raja Road, Kovalam , Trivandrum - 695527 ....Management

AND

Sri B. Manikandan , Kallumalakuzhy Veedu , Kovalam , P.O. Trivandrum - 695527 ... Workman

AWARD

This Governmen of India by Order No. -42012/ 262/ 2000 / IR ( DU ) dated 27-12-2000 have referred this industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudicating the following issue :

"Whether the action of the management of Institute of Hotel Management and Catering Technology, Kovalam , Trivandrum in terminating the services of Sri Manikandan , B. , Helper/ cleaner w.e.f. 5-7-2000 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The workman Sri Manikandan has stated in his claim statement that the management Institute which is imparting training to students in tourism sector is an ' industry' coming within the definition of that term in the Industrial Disputes Act ( the Act ' for short ) . Hostels are functioning at Kovalam for such students and the training is for 3 years . The hotels are permanent and the management is utilising the service of helpers/cleaners for the running of the hotels . Such workers are doing all types of cleaning work in addition to the assistance [भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

renderedby them in the kitchen ofthe hostel . Such workers are doing all types of cleaning work in addition to the assistance rendered by them in the kitchen of the hostel . They used to work for 12 hours in a day. The workman claims tobe employed by the management in the Institute from April, 1998 on a monthly salary of Rs . 750 which was enhanced subsequently to Rs . 1,500 . He has worked alldays including holiday, but he was not given the benefit ofweekly holidays , Festival holidays etc. The workman demanded eligible salary and other benefits as per law and in retaliation of that the management illegally terminated his service on 5-7-2000 . It is a case of unfair labour practice and after terminating the workman the management has appointed another person in that vacancy. According to him he belongs to a backward community in the lower strata of the society and is the only earning member of his family. He is claiming reinstatement in service with all benefits .

3. The management opposes the claim of the workman. It is stated that the management is an educational Institution and hence it is not an industry as defined under Section 2 (j ) of the Act . Therefore this reference is not maintainable as this is not an industrial dispute. The management has not appointed any helpers/ cleaners as alleged. The students who are undergoing training in the Institute are doing cleaning operations as part of their course and hence there is no necessity of casual labourers except assistants in the kitchen . The management has not engaged any person for 12 hours work and even for temporary work in the hotel workers were employed either in the morning or in the evening . The management has engaged casual labourers only on contractbasis and that was done by the Hostel Committee . Furthertheywere paid by the students . However now such work isdoneby the students and hence there is no necessity ofsuch labourers for the Hotel Committee . On that ground the question of appointment or dismissal of such employees does not arise. The management denies all other allegations of the workman and according to the management the workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. The workman has given evidence as WW1 . The Administrative Officer of the management has given evidence as MW1 . Subsequently the documents produced from the side of the workman have been marked as Exts. W1 to W3 and the documents produced from the side of management have been marked as Exts . M1 to M3 as agreed by both sides.

5. In the light of the contentions advanced by the parties the points emerging for consideration are (i) whether this industrial dispute is maintainable and whether the workman involved in this dispute is a workman as defined under Sec. 2( s) of the Act .

3770 GI/04-22

169

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौप 11 , 1926

(ii ) whether the workman is entitled to any relief.

6. Point No. 1 :

0.1 According to the management the present reference is not maintainable as the management institute is an educational institution which is not an industry as defined under Sec . 2(j ) of the Act and the workman is not a workman within the definition of Sec. 2( s) of the Act. In the light of the contention of the management it is necessaryto refer Secs . 2(j ) and 2 (s) of the Act which are reproduced as below:

2(j ) " industry " means any systematic activity carried onbyco -operation between an employer and his workmen(whether such workmen are employed by such employer directly or by or through any agency, including a contractor ) for the production , supply or distribution of goods or services with a view to satisfy human wants or wishes ( not being wants or wishes which are merely spiritual or religious in nature ) whether or not,-

(i ) any capital has been invested for the purpose of carrying on such activity; or (ii) such activity is carried on with a motive to make any gain or profit .

2(s) " workman means any person ( including an apprentice employed in any industry to do any manual , unskilled , skilled , technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purpose of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed , discharged or retrenched , in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute or whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute but does not include any such person-

(i ) who is subject to the Air Force Act , 1950 (45 of 1950) , or the Army Act , 1950 (46 of 1950 ) , or the Navy Act, 1957 ( 62 of 1957) ; or

(ii ) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison: or

( iii ) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or

( iv) who , being employed in supervisory capacity. draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or exercises , either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him , functions mainly of a managerial nature . " 170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

definition of the term industry and industrial dispute is maintainable .

0.2 It is now well settled that this Act is a welfare statute mainly aimed at improving the working conditions of the working people and as such this statute has to be liberally construed so as to achieve the said purpose.

7. Itis pointed out that the management institution has been set up by the Ministry of Tourism , Government of India to provide education and training of students in the field of hotel management and catering technology . Hence it is not an industry according to the management . It is not disputed that the workman was employed in the hostel of the management Institute wherein students are staying while undergoing training . There is also no dispute that the hostels are permanent and the management is utilising the service of helpers/cleaners also for running the hostels . The work in the hostel is a systematic activity and distribution of service . The nature of activity in the hostel makes it clear that there is employer employee relationship be een the employees and the management . There is also nothing to show that the management is exercising sovereign functions . There is no dispute that in the hostels students are paying for their food and accommodation and the management has no case that the Government is providing any subsidy for the purpose . This shows that hostel is run on a commercial basis . The question whether the management is making any profit or not is immaterial . Such activity of the hostel wherein the workman was employed in the kitchen will definitely come within the definition of " industry " . The workman was employed as Helper/ Cleaner in the hostel to do unskilled manual labour. The management has no case that he was doing any managerial or supervisory function to take the workmen out of the definition of Section 2( s) of the Act . Hence the workman in this dispute is a ' workman ' as defined under the Act. This reference is therefore maintainable .

9. Insupport of the contention that this reference is not maintainable the management has placed reliance on some decisions of Supreme Court and High Courts . The first authority cited is the decision of the Supreme Court reported in (AIR '63 SCC 1873) which was not made available to this Tribunal and hence could not be considered . Further it is stated in the decision of the High Court of Kerala in Umayammal V. State of Kerala ( 1982 KLT 129 ) at page 840 that the above mentioned decision of the Supreme Court was overruled . The next authority cited is the decision of the High Court of Kerala in Umayammal V. State of Kerala ( 1982 KLT 829 ) . In that case the question considered was not exactly similar as involved in the case on hand. Further the Court in that case held that employees working under several Government Departments and Railways are workmen as defined under the Act . As a matter of fact the dicta in the decision support the case of the workman and is against the claim of the management in the case on hand . The third authority cited is a decision reported in [ 1992 ( 1 ) KLT short note No. 5] . In that case an employee who was employed by a contractor was terminated when the contract came to an end . The employee then sought absorption in the management establishment . The Court held that the dispute raised by the employee is not an industrial dispute . In the present case there is no evidence that the workman was employed by a contractor on contractbasis. Therefore this decision has no application. The next authority cited is a decision reported in [ '72 ( 2) KLT short note 21 ] which was not made available and hence could not be considered. The management has also placed reliance on another decision reported in [ 1997 ( 2) KLT short note No. 8 ] . That was a case between S. K. Vidyarthi V. State of Bihar. In that case the court held thatwhen appointments are regulated by statutory rules , concept of industry to that extent stands excluded and disengagement of casual workers from service cannot be construed to be retrenchment under the Act. This decision has also no application here because there is nothing to show that the appointment in the post of the workman in question is not regulated by statutory rules . The last authority cited is a decision of the High Court of Gujarat in Raj Ratna Seth V. Ashok Bhasin ( 1982 LIC 338) . In that case the employees were hired only for doing heavy work and the students were doing most of the work in the residential school . The court held that since employees were hired only in minimal matters so as not to destroy non-employce character of institution , said school was not an industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) of the Act . In the case on hand there is no evidence that the students in the hostel were doing most of the work and the workman was hired only for particular work . So this decision also has no application here .

8. The above view is supported by the following decisions . The High Court of Madras has considered the question whether the Agricultural University is an industry and the employees working in the mess attached to the hostel would be employees of the University in the case between Tamil Nadu Agricultural University and Secretary, Socialist Thozhilali Sangam [ 1991 ( II) CLR 7201. That was a case in which the dispute was between the University and the employces working in the mess attached to the hostel . The High Court held that the University would come within the definition of industry and the employees working in the mess would be employees in the University and the Industrial Dispute is maintainable . The High Court of Madhya Pradesh also considered the same question in Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishvidyalaya Sagar V. Presiding Officer, Labour Court ( 1996 LLR 1096) . After referring carlier decisions including the famous decision of the Supreme Court in Bangalore Water Supply Case ( AIR 78 SC 548) , the High Court held that the University would come within the 171 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

10. Point No. 2 :

the date of Ext . W3 . But the management has no case that Ext. W3 has been subsequently cancelled. As such this is applicable to the casual workers subsequently selected and worked under the Departments of Government of India. As per Ext. W3 the workman is entitled to get temporary status , and is entitled to get appointment inthe vacancy arising in ' D ' Pool . But the management has ignored this and terminated the services of the workman. Hence the action of the management is unjustified on this ground also. Therefore on the strength of Ext . W3 also the workman is entitled to get reinstatement in service .

12. The management has a contention that the appointments in the management Institute and hostels are governed by orders of the Government of India and as per that the posts of Sweeper, Chowkidar, Electrician, Plumber etc. would be managed by engaging contract staff. In support of this contention the management has producedExts . Ml to M3 . According to the management inthe light of Exts . M1 to M3 the workmen can never be an employee of management and he was not appointed by the management . Ext. M1 is an order of the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India dated 27-7-1998 . This orderis regarding certain posts such as Asstt . Instructor, Accountant, Office Superintendent etc. As per Class III of Ext. M1 , Gardener, Sweeper, Chokidar, Electrician, Plumber etc.would be managed by engaging contract Staff. The workman was employed before the issuance of Ext . M1 order as evident from Exts . Wl and W2 . Further there is no evidence on record that he was engaged on contract basis by the Hostel Committee as alleged . On the other hand Exts . W1 and W2 clearly establish that he was employed and paid by the management . It is true that Ext. Ml was further streamlined and revised by Ext. M3 dated 29-1-2001 . But Ext . M3 has application only from 29-1-2001 . Therefore the contention of the management based on Exts . M1 and M3 order is unsustainable .

13. In view of the above discussions , an award is passed holding that the action of management in terminating the service of Sri B. Manikandan , the workman in this case w.e.f. 5-7-2000 is justified and directing the management to reinstate him in service with all attendant benefits .

C. N. SASIDHARAN, Industrial Tribunal The employment of the workman is not in dispute. But according to the management he was engaged intermittently for 700 days by a hostel committee and the management never appointed him. It is pertinent to note that the management who is in possession of the material documents, failed to produce any documents in support ofthis contention. Of course MW1 has deposed in support of the case of management. But his evidence is not supported by any documents in this regard. No doubt the management has submitted a list along with its written statement filed before this Tribunal , narrating the dates of engagement and salary paid to the workman for the period from April, 1998 to July, 2000. But the management has not produced the concerned register from which the said details stated in the written statement were recorded . There is no evidence to show that the activities of the hostel are conducted by a hostel committee and the workman was employed by such committee as alleged by the management. The management has not adduced any evidence in support of the contention that the students are doing all the works in the hostel including cleaning, cooking etc. On the other hand the workman has produced Exts. W1 - series and W2 - series , photocopies of the relevant pages of the register showing staff salary in the hostel and the statement submitted to the principal ofthe Institute from the hostel, showing the attendance of employees in each month from April , 1998. The genuineness of Exts . WI - series and W2 -series are not at all in dispute. The management has not produced the concerned registers to prove that Exts . W1 - series and W2 - series are fabricated documents . There are absolutely no reasons to disbelieve these documents . Exts . W1 and W2 - series supported by the deposition of the workman make it abundantly clear that the workman has worked in the hostel of management continuously for more than 240 days from April , 1998 . There is no evidence on record that the appointment of helper/cleaner in the hostel of the management is governed by any rules . The workman was not charge sheeted for any misconduct and he was not given any order terminating his service by the management . There is no dispute that the workman is not in the service of the management after 5-7-2000 . These circumstances clearly establish that the management has terminated the service of the workman without complying with the relevant provisions under the Act. Therefore the action of the management is illegal and unjustified.

APPENDIX

Witness examined on the side of the workman

WW1 : Sri B. Manikandan .

Documents marked on the side of the workman

Ext. W1 series ( 9 nos . ) Photocopies of the relevant pages of staff salary register of the hostel for the year 1998-99 .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

Ext. W2 series ( 10 nos . ) Photocopies of letters addressed to Principal of the Management Institute from the Administrator regarding attendance of hostel attenders .

Ext. W3 Photocopy of office memorandum No. 51010/290 Estt. ( C) dated 10-9-1993 of the Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India ..

Documents marked on the side of the Management Ext. MI Copy of order of the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India dated 27-7-1998 .

Ext. M2: Photocopy of letter issued to the principal of the Management from the Asstt . Labour Commissioner , Central Trivandrum dated 10-7-2000.

Ext. M3 Copy of letter addressed to the Principal of the Management Institute from the Ministry of Tourism , Government of India dated 29-1-2001 .

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 47.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंस्टिट्यूट ऑफ होटल मैनेजमैंट एवं केटरिंग टेक्नोनॉजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कोलाम के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42012/263/2000-आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd December, 2004 S.O. 47. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal , Kollam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Institute of Hotel Management and Catering Technology and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-12-2004 .

[No. L - 42012 / 263 / 2000 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , KOLLAM

(Dated , this the 15th day of November, 2004) PRESENT :

Sri C. N. Sasidharan , Industrial Tribunal

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 13/2001 BETWEEN

The Principal ,

Institute ofManagement and Catering Technology,

G. V. Raja Road, Kovalam , Trivandrum - 695527 .

....Management

AND

Sri Udayakumar, Karmer Veedu,

Kovalam , P.O. Trivandrum -695527 . AWARD Workman The Government of India by Order No. L- 42012/ 263/2000/IR (DU) dated 27-12-2000 have referred this industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudicating the following issue :

"Whether the action of the management of Institute ofHotel Management and Catering Technology, Kovalam , Trivandrum in terminating the services of Sri Udayakumar S , helper/ cleaner w.e.f. 5-7-2000 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The workman Sri Udayakumar has stated in his claim statement that the management Institute which is imparting training to students in tourism sector is an `industry' coming within the definition of that term in the Industrial Disputes Act (' the Act ' for short ) . Hostels are functioning at Kovalam for such students and the training is for 3 years . The Hostels are permanent and the management is utilising the service of helpers/cleaners for the running of the Hostels . Such workers are doing all types of cleaning work in addition to the assistance rendered by them in the kitchen of the Hostel . They used to work for 12 hours in a day. The workman claims to be employed by the management in the Institute from April , 1998 on a monthly salary of Rs . 750 which was enhanced subsequently to Rs . 1,500 . He has worked all days including holiday, but he was not given the benefit of weekly holidays , Festival holidays etc. The workman demanded eligible salary and other benefits as per law and in retaliation of that the management illegally terminated his service on 5-7-2000 . It is a case of unfair labour practice and after terminating the workman the management has appointed another person in that vacancy. According to him he belongs to a backward community in the lower strata of the society and is the only earning member of his family. He is claiming reinstatement in service with all benefits .

3. The management opposes the claim of the workman . It is stated that the management is an educational Institution and hence it is not an industry as [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

defined under Section 2 (j ) of the Act . Therefore this reference is not maintainable as this is not an industrial dispute. The Management has not appointed any helpers/ cleaners as alleged. The students who are undergoing training in the Institute are doing cleaning operations as part of their course and hence there is no necessity of casual labourers except assistants in the kitchen . The management has not engaged any person for 12 hours work and even for temporary work in the Hostel workers were employed either in the morning or in the evening . The management has engaged casual labourers only on contract basis and that was done by the Hostel Committee. Further theywere paid by the students . However now such work is done by the students and hence there is no necessity of such labourers for the Hostel Committee . On that ground the question of appointment or dismissal of such employees does not arise . The management denies all other allegations of the workman and according to the manageinent the workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. The workman has given evidence as WW1 . The management has not adduced any oral evidence . Subsequently the documents produced from the side of the workman have been marked as Exts . W1 to W3 and the documents produced from the side of management have been marked as Exts . M1 to M3 as agreed by both sides.

5. In the light of the contentions advanced by the parties the points emerging for consideration are- (1) whether this industrial dispute is maintainable and whether the workman involved in this dispute is a workman as defined under Sec . 2(s) ofthe Act .

(2) whether the workman is entitled to any relief.

6. Point No. 1 :

0.1. According to the management the present reference is not maintainable as the management institute is an educational institution which is not an industry as defined under Sec . 2(j ) of the Act and the workman is not a workman within the definition of Sec. 2(s) of the Act. In the light of the contention of the management it is necessary to refer Secs . 2 (j ) and 2(s) of the Act which are reproduced as below:

2(j ) " industry" means any systematic activity carried onby co-operation between an employer and his workmen(whether such workmen are employed by such employer directly or by or through any agency, including a contractor ) for the production , supply or distribution of goods or services with a view to satisfy human wants or wishes (not being wants or wishes which are merely spiritual or religious in nature) whether or not,-

173 (i ) any capital has been invested for the purpose of carrying on such activity; or (ii) such activity is carried on with a motive to make any gain or profit .

2(s) " workman" means any person (including an apprentice employed in any industry to do any manual , unskilled , skilled , technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purpose of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed , discharged or retrenched , in connection with , or as consequence of, that dispute or whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute but does not include any such person-

(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act , 1950 (45 of 1950) , or the Army Act , 1950 (46 of 1950) , or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or

(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or

(iii) who is employed mainly a managerial or administrative capacity; or

(iv) who , being employed in supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or exercises , either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him , functions mainly of a managerial nature . " 0.2. It is now well settled that this Act is a welfare statute mainly aimed at improving the working conditions ofthe working people and as such this statute has to be liberally construed so as to achieve the said purpose.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

exercising sovereign functions . There is no dispute that in the Hostel students are paying for their food and accommodation and the management has no case that the Government is providing any subsidy for the purpose . This shows that hostel is run on a commercial basis . The question whether the management is making any profit or not is immaterial . Such activity of the hostel wherein the workman was employed in the kitchen will definitely comes within the definition of " industry " . The workman was employed as Helper/ Cleaner in the Hostel to do unskilled manual labour . The management has no case that he was doing any managerial or supervisory function to take the workmen out of the definition of Section 2( s) of the Act . Hence the workman in this dispute is a ' workman ' as defined under the Act . This reference is therefore maintainable .

8. The above view is supported by the following decisions . The High Court of Madras has considered the question whether the Agricultural University is an industry and the employees working in the mess attached to the Hostel would be employees of the University in the case between Tamil Nadu Agricultural University and Secretary, Socialist Thozhilali Sangam [ 1991 ( II) CLR 720] . That was a case in which the dispute was between the University and the employees working in the mess attached to the Hostel . The High Court held that the University would come within the definition of industry and the employees working in the mess would be employees in the University and the Industrial Dispute is maintainable . The High Court of Madhya Pradesh also considered the same question in Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishawavidyalaya Sagar V. Presiding Officer , Labour Court(1996 LLR 1096 ) . After referring earlier decisions including the famous decision of the Supreme Court in Bangalore Water Supply Case (AIR '78 SC 548 ) , the High Court held that the University would come within the definition of the term industry and the industrial dispute is maintainable .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] decision support the case of the workman and is against the claim of the management in the case of hand . The third authority cited is a decision reported in [ 1992 ( 1 ) KLT short note No. 5 ] . In that case an employee who was employed by a contractor was terminated when the contract came to an end . The employee then sought absorption in the management establishment . The Court held that the dispute raised by the employee is not an industrial dispute . In the present case there is no evidence that the workman was employed by a contractor on contract basis . Therefore this decision has no application . The next authority cited is a decision reported in [ '72 (2 ) KLT short note 21 ] which was not made available and hence could not be considered . The management has also placed reliance on another decision reported in [ 1997 (2 ) KLT short note No. 8] . That was a case between S. K. Vidyarthi V. State of Bihar. In that case the court held that when appointments are regulated by statutory rules , concept of industry to that extent stands excluded and disengagement of casual workers from service cannot be construed to be retrenchment under the Act . This decision has also no application here because there is nothing to show that the appointment in the post of the workman in question is not regulated by statutory rules . The last authority cited is a decision of the High Court ofGujarat in Raj Ratna Seth V. Ashok Bhasin ( 1982 LIC 338) . In that case the employees were hired only for doing heavy work and the students were doing most of the work in the residential school . The court held that since employees were hired only in minimal matters so as not to destroy . non-employee character of institution, said school was not an industry within the meaning of Section 2(j ) of the Act . In the case on hand there is no evidence that the students in the hostel were doing most of the work and the workman was hired only for particular work . So this decision also has no application here .

10. Point No. 2 :

The employment of the workman is not in dispute. Butaccording to the management he was engaged intermittently for 700 days by a hostel committee and the management never appointed him. It is pertinent to note that the management who is in possession of the material documents , failed to produce any documents in support of this contention . No doubt the management has submitted a list along with its written statement filed before this Tribunal, narrating the dates of engagement and salary paid to the workman for the period from April , 1998 to July, 2000. But the management has not produced the concerned register from which the said details stated in the written statement were recorded . There is no evidence to show that the activities of the hostel are conducted by a hostel committee and the workman was employed by such committee as alleged by the management . The management has not adduced any evidence in support of the contention that the students are doing all the works in [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

the hostel including cleaning , cooking etc. On the other hand the workman has produced Exts . W1 -series and W2- series, photocopies of the relevant pages of the register showing staff salary in the hostel and the statement submitted to the Principal of the Institute from the hostel , showing the attendance of employees in each month from April , 1998. The genuineness of Exts: W1 - series and W2- series are not at all in dispute. The management has not produced the concerned registers to prove that Exts . W1- series and W2 - series are fabricated documents . There are absolutely, no reasons to disbelieve these documents . Exts . W1 and W2 - series supported by the deposition of the workman make it abundantly clear that the workman has worked in the hostel of management continuously for more than 240 days from April, 1998. There is no evidence on record that the appointment of helper/cleaner in the hostel ofthe management is governed by any rules . The workman was not chargesheeted for any misconduct and he was not given any order terminating his service by the management . There is no dispute that the workman is not in the service of the management after 5-7-2000 . These circumstances clearly establish that the management has terminated the service of the workman without complying with the relevant provisions under the Act . Therefore the action of the management is illegal and unjustified.

11. The workman has brought to the notice of this Tribunal Ext . W3 , an office memorandum dated 10-9-1993 of Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India , in support of his claim. As per clause 4 of Ext. W3 temporary status would be conferred on all casual labourers who are in employment on the date of Ext. W3 and who have rendered continuous service of 240 days . Of course this workman was not in service on the date of Ext. W3 . But the management has no case that Ext . W3 has been subsequently cancelled. As such this is applicable to the casual workers subsequently selected and worked under the Departments of Government of India . As per Ext . W3 the workman is entitled to get temporary status , and is entitled to get appointment in the vacancy arising in ' D' Pool . But the management has ignored this and terminated the services of the workman. Hence the action of the management is unjustified on this ground also . Therefore on the strength of Ext . W3 also the workman is entitled to get reinstatement in service .

12. The management has a contention that the appointments in the Management Institute and hostel are governed by orders of the Government of India and as per that the posts of Sweeper , Chowkidar, Electrician, Plumberetc. would be managed by engaging contract staff. In support of this contention the management has produced Exts. M1 to M3 . According to the management in the light of Exts . M1 to M3 the workmen can never be an employee of management and he was not appointed by the management . Ext . M1 is an order of the Ministry of

175

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

Tourism; Government of India dated 27-7-1998 . This order is regarding certain posts. such as Asstt . Instructor, Accountant , Office Superintendent etc. As per Class III ofExt . M1 , Gardener , Sweeper, Chokidar, Electrician, Plumber etc. would be managed by engaging contract Staff. The workman was employed before the issuance of Ext . M1 order as evident from Exts . W1 and W2 . Further there is no evidence on record that he was engaged on contract basisby the Hostel Committee as alleged. On the other hand Exts . W1 and W2 clearly establish that he was employed and paid by the management . It is true that Ext. Ml was further streamlined and revised by Ext. M3 dated 29-1-2001 . But Ext . M3 has application only from 29-1-2001 . Therefore the contention of the management based on Exts . M1 and M3 order is unsustainable .

13. In view of the above discussions , an award is passed holding that the action of management in terminating the service of Sri S. Udayakumar, the workman in this case w.e.f. 5-7-2000 is justified and directing the management to reinstate him in service with all attendant benefits .

C. N. SASIDHARAN , Industrial Tribunal . APPENDIX

Witness examined on the side of the workman WWI : Sri S. Udayakumar .

Documents marked on the side of the Corporation Ext. W1 series ( 9 nos. ) Photocopies of the relevant pages of staff salary register of the hostel for the year 1998-99 .

Ext. W2 series ( 10 nos . ) Photocopies of letters addressed to Principal of the management Institute from the Administrator regarding attendance of hostel attenders .

Ext. W3 Photocopy of office memorandum No. 51010/ 290- Estt . ( C) dated 10-9-1993 of the Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India .

Documents marked on the side of the Management Ext. MI Copy of order of the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India dated 27-7-1998 .

Ext. M2: Photocopy of letter issued to the Principal of the management from the Asstt . Labour Commissioner , Central Trivandrum dated 10-7-2000.

Ext. M3 Copy of letter addressed to the Principal of the Management Institute from the Ministry of Tourism , Government of India dated 29-1-2001 .

176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

REFERENCE :

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

Order No. L -41012/ 128/93 - IR(DU) dated 7-2-1994 Ministry of Labour, Govt . of India, New Delhi .

का. आ. 48.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सदर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण तमिलनाडू, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई . डी. नं. 1994 का 9 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 41012/128/93- आई. आर. (बी. I ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव

Thisdispute coming on for final hearing on Monday, the 11th day ofOctober, 2004, upon perusing the reference , Claim and Counter statements and all other material papers on record and upon hearing the arguments of Tvl . G. Alex Benziger and P. Premkumar , advocates appearing for the Workman and of Tvl . P. Arulmudi & P. Srinivasan , Advocates appearing for the Management Nos . 1 & 2 and this dispute having stood over till this day for consideration , this Tribunal made the following :

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

AWARD

TheGovt. of India has referred the following issue for adjudication by this Tribunal :

S.O. 48. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. No. 9 of 1994) of the Industrial Tribunal Tamil Nadu , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 06-12-2004 .

"Whether the action of the management of Southern Railway, Madras in terminating the services of Sri K. Masilamani ( having attained temporary status of the Railway employees from 26-10-84) w.e.f. 25-8-89 is just , proper, legal and justified ?

If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " [No. L -41012/ 128/ 93 - IR(B . I) ] B. M DAVID , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

2. The main averments found in the Claim statement of the Petitioner are as follows :

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , TAMIL NADU , CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 9th day of November , 2004

PRESENT:

The Petitioner who joined the service of the Southern Railway Palghat Division as Casual labour on 23-8-1983 was working under the PWI (Project Wayside Inspector) atAngadipuram and also at PW1 / SW/ SRR. After serving about 15 months petitioner was granted temporary status by the Senior Division Personnel Officer , Palghat Division , Southern Railway in his Office letter dt . 4-12-1984.

Thiru K. S. Venkatachalam , B.Sc. B. L. DTL , Industrial Tribunal

Industrial Dispute No. 9 of 1994

[ In the matter of dispute for adjudication under Sec. 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 between the Workman and the Management of the General Manager, Sr. D.P.O. ( Port Cell) , Southern Railway, Park Town , Madras - 3 , and another ] .

BETWEEN

The Workman Shri K. Masilamani ,

S/o Krishnan , Ka . Narasingapuram , Kavanoor Post , Via Arakonam & TK.

AND

1. The General Manager , Sr. D.P.O. (Port Cell) , Southern Railway, Park Town , Madras-3.

2. Sr. D.P.O. , Southern Railway Division, Palghat.

3. On 11-9-1987 , the petitioner was served with a chargeMemo . The petitioner replied to that Charge Memo denying the charges . Thereafter an enquiry was ordered and it commenced from 19-12-87 . The enquiry was adjourned to various dates . In the meanwhile, the petitioner met with a train accident on 11-3-1988 and he underwent treatment as in - patient for several months . The adjourned enquiry was finally posted to 26-4-89 . On that date, the petitioner's authorised defence helper was not able to attend the enquiry due to his illness . Though that fact was brought to the notice of the Enquiry officer by the petitioner, the Enquiry officer decided to proceed with the enquiry even in the absence of the defence helper. Since the Enquiry officer had done so in spite of the protest raised by the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted representations to the DPM/ Palghat and the Enquiry officer on 11-1-1989 and 13-6-1989 . After the enquiry report was submitted by the Enquiry officer, the petitioner was served with the Order of Penalty advice dt . 14-8-89 on 25-8-89 . On the same day petitioner was removed from service.

177 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

as a casual labourer under the permanent way Inspector/ Angadipuram . Thereafter he was granted CPC scale of pay from 23-10-84 by an Order dt . 4-12-84 taking into consideration of his 120 days of continuous service in the open line establishment.

4. The petitioner had preferred an appeal to the Senior Divisional Engineer, Palghat Division, Southern Railway on 25-8-89 . The petitioner has also moved the Central Administrative Tribunal at Madras under the Administrative Tribunal Act . The Central Administrative Tribunal while disposing of O.A. No. 96/91 on 21-10-91 forwant ofjurisdiction has granted liberty to the petitioner to seek relief before the Labour Court . Thereafter the petitioner filed a Petition before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) at Madras under Sec. 2A of the I.D. Act. The Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central) - 1, Madras after conciliation has sent the failure report to the Ministry of Labour, Govt . of India , New Delhi on 13-10-93 . The Ministry of Labour, Govt . of India has referred the matter to the Industrial Tribunal for adjudication of the issue as to whether the action of the Management of Southern Railway in terminating the service of Sri K. Masilamani w.e.f. 25-8-99 is just, proper, legal and justified by its Order dt . 7-2-1994.

5. The petitioner never furnished the alleged service Card. The casual service rendered from 23-8-83 by the petitioner was considered by the Railway for the temporary status . No proper , just , fair and legal enquiry was conducted against the petitioner . The Enquiry officer refused to consider the request of the petitioner to examine two ofthe officers connected with the issue. The Enquiry officer had not granted opportunity to the petitioner to defend his case with the help of a defence helper. The Enquiry officer conducted the enquiry without the presence of the petitioner and submitted the report of his findings . The enquiry is partial , unfair and as such the report and findings of the Enquiry officer have to be treated as null and void. The order of removal from service issued by the respondents is not sustainable under law and rules . It is on the basis of an Unfair, illegal and partial enquiry. The petitioner was not issued a Second show cause notice . So thetermination of service ofthe petitioner is illegal . Hence Claim petition has been filed for directing the respondents/ management to reinstate the petitioner with continuous service , backwages and other benefits .

The main averments found in the Counter statement of the Respondents are as follows :

7. Since complaint were received regarding the bonafide nature of the service card produced by the petitioner, the Asst . Engineer , Shoranur initiated action to verify the same by writing a letter dated 22-11-85 to District Signal Telecommunication engineer, Werks/ Tambarm. The Senior District Signal and Telecommunication engineer /Works/Tambaramby his reply dt . 11-12-85 has stated that the petitioner and other employees were not engaged in his unit during the relevant period and the service card has not been issued to them. Thenonly the administration came to know that the casual labourer service card produced by the petitioner is not genuine. Then the Shoranur Asst. Engineer issued a Charge memo on 11-9-87 to the petitioner. The explanation letter of the petitioner is dated 22-9-87 . Thereafter an enquiry officer was appointed on 12-9-87 and the petitioner was informed the same . The petitioner was given opportunities for inspection of documents and engagement of defence helper. The petitioner originally engaged one Anantha Raj as his defence helper and later he changed that defence helper and one K.P. Antony was appointed as Defence helper. The enquiry proceedings were adjourned several times at the instance of the petitioner and his defence helper from 19-12-87 to 11-1-88 and thereafter to 13-4-88 . The petitioner requested the Enquiry officer to arrange for the presence of some officers as witnesses . That request was not considered by the Enquiry officer as he decided that there is no necessity to examine them. Thereafter the enquiry was fixed on 18-1-89 and the records from the office of the District Signal and Telecommunication Works , Tambaram were called for and even though one Munusamy Raja came with the records, the enquiry was postponed to 26-4-89 since the defence helper was absent on that day . On 26-4-89 the Defence helper reported sick . Though the petitioner was aware of the date of enquiry well in advance , he did not bother to arrange for the attendance of the Defence helper or to change his defence helper . Since the Enquiry Officer had already adjourned the enquiry several times , he had no other go except to proceed with the enquiry on 26-4-89 . On that day, the petitioner and Sri Munusamy Raju , attended the enquiry but the petitioner was not willing to cooperate and participate in the enquiry.

8. On 26-4-89 , the Enquiry Officer verified the LTI Register and Pay Ledger produced by the witness Munusamy Raju . Since the name of the petitioner was not found in those records , the Enquiry officer concluded that the C.L.R. card produced by the petitioner was not 6. On and from 18-12-80 , there was a ban on engagement of fresh casual labourers in the railways as per the Railway Board Circulardt. 18-12-1980 . However, re-engagement of casual labourers already served in the railways was permitted . The petitioner produced a casual labour service card with LTI No. 1386 purported to have been signed by the Chief Signal Inspector Tambaram, and said to have been issued by the District Signal and Telecommunication engineer /Works/Tambaram certifying casual labour service from 20-9-78 to 21-12-78 . On the basis of that card the petitioner was engaged on 23-8-83

3770 Gl/04-23 178

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

by DSTE -WTBM indicating that he had worked as Casual labourer in that establishment for a period of 73 days in the year 1978. The termination is for contravention of provisions ofRule 3 ( 1 ) of Railway Services Conduct Rules 1966.

issued to him by the District Signal and Telecommunication Engineer /Works/Tambaram and that it is a Bogus Card. The Disciplinary authority after perusing the Enquiry report , applying his mind has passed the penalty order of removal from service of the petitioner. On receipt of that penalty advicedt . 14-8-89 the petitioner moved the Appellate authority Senior Divisional Engineer, on appeal and that appeal has been dismissed on 20-11-89 . Thereafter the petitioner challenged in O. A. No. 96/91 the penalty order passed by the Disciplinary Authority before the Central Administrative Tribunal , Madras . Since the Central Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the appeal with liberty to take appropriate proceedings before the Labour Court , the petitioner has raised an Industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer and it has ended in the reference of the dispute to the Tribunal .

9. The sconduct committed by the petitioner renders his unit and unsuitable for continuing in service . By virtue of the Railway Board's letterdt . 1-6-1968 an employer is empowered to take action against the employee is respect of misconduct committed before his employment , if the misconduct is of such a nature as having rational connection with his present employment . After the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution , it is not necessary to give the copy of the enquiry report before imposing the penalty. The domestic enquiry was conducted properly taking into consideration all the relevant matters . Hence the claim petition has to be dismissed.

10. On the side of the petitioner, one witness has been examined as WWI and six documents have been filed and marked as Exs . W1 to W6 . On the side of the management, two witnesses have been examined as MW1 and MW2 and 16 documents have been filed and marked as Exs . M1 to M16.

11. Point for consideration : Whether the action of the management of Southern Railway , Madras in terminating the services of Sri K. Masilamani ( having attained temporary status of the Railway employees from 26-10-84 ) w.e.f. 25-8-89 is just , proper , legal and justified. If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ?

12. POINT: The workman K. Masilamani working as Casual Labour under the Project Wayside Inspector at Angadipuram has been terminated of his service from 14-8-89 by the Management of Southern Railway, Palghat Division by its Order of the same date marked as Ex . W4 . That penalty advice dt . 14-8-89 was issued by the Asst . Engineer , Souranur Division. That termination order is in pursuation of the findings of Enquiry Offcer in a domestic enquiry over a Charge of his having secured employment as Casual labourer on the strength of a flase Casual Labour Service Card purported to have been issued

13. The contention of the workman K. Masilamani both in the Claim petition as well as during the Enquiry proceedings and thereafter in the Appeal and Conciliaiton proceedings is that he has not committed any misconduct ofproducing false Casual Labour Service Card. But it is relevant to note that the Stand of the workman is otherwise inhis reply to the show cause notice dt . 1-9-87 . The Show Cause notice and Charge Sheet Memorandum is marked as Ex . W2 . The reply to that show cause notice is marked as Ex . M16 . It is to be noted that in Ex . M16 dt . 6-2-88 the workman has admitted in para. 4 that the Casual Labour Service Card issued by the CSI , Tambaram, is a genuine card . That averment in the reply letter is inconsistent with the plea of the concerned workman in the departmental enquiry and thereafter . It is significant to note that in Ex. M16 the petitioner has admitted his production of Casual Labour Service Card bearing LTI No. 1386 at the time of entering employment as CPC Mazdoor PW1 , Angadipuram Section, Palghat Division in the year 1985. So when the workman in his reply to the show cause notice has admitted his production of Casual Labour Service Card bearing LTI No. 1386 is inconsistent and totally contradictory plea in the further proceedings can only be considered as an after thought and cannot be relied upon . It is only for the first time during the pending of the domestic enquiry the workman has for reasons best known to him has pleaded on 11-1-89 , in his letter marked as Ex . W3 that he has not produced any Service Card at the time of joining services in the Shoranur Sub - Division on 23-8-83 . It is disclosed from a perusal of the Enquiry report , marked as Ex . W4 and letter of the worker dt. 13-6-89 marked as Ex . W5 that the workman has initially participated in the enquiry proceedings with the assistance of the defence counsel K. P. Antony which have been adjourned time and again and he had been present on the enquiry dates i.e. 18-1-89 and 26-4-89 . On 26-4-89 the workman has attended the enquiry but has not participated in the enquiry since his defence counsel was not present due to illness . On 26-4-89 , one witness namely K. Munusamy Raju , Sub- Inspector to DSTE - W - TBM has been examined and the documents Pay ledger and LTI register have been marked through him . Taking into consideration of the evidence of that witness and perusing the documents marked through him, the Enquiry Officer has arrived at the finding that the charges against the workman has been proved beyond doubt.

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

14. Éven in the claim statement and prior to that in his appeal to the Appellate Authority Conciliation Petition Proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal, he main contention of the workman had been that he has been granted temporary status by the Assistant Personnel Officer of the Palghat Division, Southern Railway by his Order which has been marked as Ex . W1 . In that order, mention is made of the workman K. Masilamani having entered into the service of the Southern Railway as on 20-9-1978 . The period for grant of temporary status has been taken into consideration is from 21-6-84 from which date he had been continuously working. The workman while relying upon Ex. WI cannot blowhot and cold by disowning the Casual Labour Service Card produced by him at the time of joining service at Shoranur Sub Division which has been marked as Ex . M3 . Ex. M3 is the Casual Labour Service Card issued by the DSTE -WTBM with the LTI No. 1386. In that card the alleged LTI of the workman K. Masilamani is found .

15. After the appeal to the Appellate Authority filed by the workman on 25-9-89 marked as Ex. W5 has been dismissed, the petitioner/ workman has again moved the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) Madras for Conciliation by way of a Petition marked as Ex . W6 . After that conciliation has ended in failure, the workman has moved the Central Administrative Tribunal , Madras Bench by way of Original application No. 96/99 . The Central Administrative Tribunal by its Order dt . 1-10-91 has dismissed that application with liberty to the worker to seek his relief before the Labour Court . Thereafter the petitioner/workman herein has approached the Industrial Tribunal by way of reference made to by the Ministry of Labour, Govt . of India , New Delhi by its Order dt . 7-2-94 . In that Industrial Dispute No. 9/94 , award has been passed on 30-11-94 holding that the action of the management of Southern Railway, Madras in terminating the service of K. Masilamani having attained the temporary status of the Railway employees from 26-10-84 w.e.f. 25-8-89 is just , proper legal and justified. Against that award, the General Manager of the Southern Railway has filed a Writ petition in the Madras High Court and the High Court of Madras by its order dt. 23-2-2004 has remanded the matter to Industrial Tribunal for conducting fresh enquiry and to pass orders on merits in accordance with law, setting aside the conclusion of the Industrial Tribunal , Madras that the Domestic Enquiry was conducted properly. Moreover, the Hon'ble High Court has in its Order has enabled the management to let in evidence to justify the order of the termination of the workman by granting an opportunity.

16. After that remand , one witness has been examined on the side of the workman and two witnesses

179

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

havebeen examined on the side of the management . It is the categorical evidence of MW1 , that :

" 24. 12, 80 தேதியிட்ட புதிய தொழிலாளரீகள எடுப்பதற்கு போடப்பட்ட எதிர்மதுதாரரில் தடை உத்தரவு எக். எம்.2. ஏற்கெனவே வேலையில் இருந்தால் அவரை வேலைக்கு எடுக்கும்படி கல்சிடர் செமீயலாம் . 23.8.83 ல் சலாசிவாக மறுதாரர் எதிர்மறுதாரர் நிறுவனத்தில் வேலைக்கு சேர்த்தார். அவர் ஏற்கெனவே வேலையில் இருந்த சாசித்தழை தாக்கல் செய்ததால் வேரை வேலைக்கு மீண்டும் எடுக்கப்பட்டார். அதற்காக எம்பளாக்மெயிட் கார்டு எக் எல். 3. "

So the evidence of MWI is corroborating and fortifying the contention of the management that there is a prohibition of recruitment of Casual Labourer in the Railways after the Orderdt . 24-12-80 . Even though that Order Ex. M2 prohibits enrolment of Casual Labourer in the Southern Railway, recruitment of Casual Labourer who had already worked can be considered is the further contention of the Railways . So it is only because, the workman has produced the Casual Labour Service Card Ex . M3 with LTI No. 1386. With regardto his previous employment , he had been absorbed into the Southern Railways in Palghat Division in the year 1983. That period ofhis earlier Service from 20-9-1978 is mentioned in Ex. W1 ordergranting temporary status to the workman .

17. The rebuttal evidence of the workman with regardto his entry into the services is extracted below :

பசுக்.எல்.3 ஐ நாள் கொடுக்கவில்லை. 26.10.84 அன்று எனக்கு டெம்பராரி ஸ்டேட்டல் கொடுத்தார்கள் . நாள் சதர்க் ரமிச்வே பாலக்காடு டிவிசலி அக்காடிபூரத்தில் காலைக் லேபரராக வேலை பார்த்தேன். கூடபுள்வு , 1 மிடம் அவருக்கு கீழ் பணியில் இருந்தேம், விளைப்பக்கடிதம் எழுதி கொடுத்து பல்விச் சேர்ந்தேம் . விளப்படிவத்துடசி இணைப்பு 23.8.83 லி நாள் பணியில் எஆக் இல்லை . சேர்ந்தேன், * 180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

But it is the contrary definite evidence of MW1 , Section Engineer , Palghat Division that the workman has not furnished any application form while joining services . The authenticity of the Ex . M3 Card is sought to be disproved by the evidence of MW2 . It is categorically evidence of MW2 , Head Clerk , Tambaram Southern Railway DSTE -works that :

அதனை அவர் கொடுக்கவில்லை . எக்.எம்.3 மேல் பகுதியில் கண்டிருப்பது காசுவலி லேபரி காரீடு . இந்த கார்டு 20.9.78 முதல் 21.12.78 வரை கலாசியாக தாம்பரத்தில் வேலை செய்ததற்காக எல்.டி.ஐ எலி . 1386 என்று குறிப்பிடபட்டுள்ளது . இந்த சி.எல்.காரிடில் குறிப்பிடபட்டுள்ள கையெழுத்தும் சி.எஸ்.ஐ தாம்பரம் என்று குறிப்பிடபட்டுள்ளது . ஆனால் தாம்பரத்தில் காசுவல் லேபருக்கு எல்.டி.ஐ பதிவேடு பராமரிக்கப்படுகிறது . யாரெல்லாம் காசுவல் லேபரநாக பனிபுரிகிறாரோ அவர்களுடைய இடது கை பெரு விரகீ இரகை பதிவேட்டில் இருக்கும். 20 9.78 முதல் 21.12.78 வரையுள்ள காலங்களில் யாகும் தாம்பரம் டி.எஸ்.டி.இ. வொர்க்ஸ் அணுவலகத்தில் வேலை செய்யவில்லை. அவ்கிறது செய்திருந்தால் அளகுவடய இடது கை பெருவிரல் ரேகை பதிவேட்டில் பதிவாகி இருக்கும். எம் . 14 எல்பது எக்ஸ்ட்ராகிட்டில் நகல் , அதில் எலி. 1386ல் எம் .மாசிலாமணி த/பெ மதுரை , வேலையில் சேர்ந்த தேதி 8.2.64 . மஊதாரர் 20.9 . 78 லிருந்து 21.12,78 வரையில் எல்.டி , ஐ என் .1386 ல் டி.எண், டி.இ . வொர்க்லி தாம்பரத்தில் மனுதாரர் வேலை செய்யவில்லை . "

So the above candid admission of MW2 , the concerned clerk maintaining the LTI Register proves and fortifies the claim of the management/Railways that the workman K. Masilamani has produced a false Casual Labour Service Card with LTI No. 1386 which belongs to another K. Masilamani , S/ o Madurai enrolled in the Southern Railway as Khalasi on 8-2-1964 . An extract of LTI Register containing the LTI No. 97 of the workman is marked as Ex . M13 . In the Cross -examination of WWI , the extract of LTI register of the PW.1 Angadipuram has been marked as Ex . M15 . So I find overwhelming materials both by way of documents and oral evidence to substantiate that the workman K. Masilamani has produced false and forged Casual Labour Service Card and used it for entering into service . Knowing that only previous service holders can be absorbed as Casual Labourers in the Southern Railways after 1980 , the

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] * petitioner/workman has fabricated that Ex. M3 Service card and has entered service in the Palghat Sub -Division, by producing it at the time of entry. With regard to that priormisconduct , domestic enquiry had been conducted against him after service of Charge- memo and receipt of reply. The workman who had initially participated in the enquiry, knowing that he has no satisfactory answer for the allegation of his producing a false certificate has later deliberately chosen to remain absent leaving the enquiry to have its own course. The learned counsel for the management has cited a ruling of the Supreme Court reported in 1996 ( 1 ) S.C.S.L.J. Between Union of India and Ors . Vs. M. Bhaskaran in support of his contention that the removal of the workman for his producing forged Casual Labour Service Card , is proper. In that Division Bench ruling , the observation of their Lordships is as follows:

"Appointment- Removal Estoppel Appointment secured by submitting bogus and forged casual labour card- Removal from service ordered-Mere continuity on the post for a number of years on the basis of such fraudulently obtained employment order does not create any equity in favour of employee or any estoppel against the employer. " So I conclude that the termination of the workman K. Masilamani by the management by its termination order w.e.f. 25-8-89 is just , proper, legal and justified .

18. In the result award is passed holding that the action of the management of Southern Railway , Madras in terminating the service of K. Masilamani (having attained temporary status of the Railway employees from 26-10-84) w.e.f. 25-8-89 is just , proper, legal and justified . The petitioner is not entitled to any relief. The Industrial Dispute is dismissed. No costs .

Dated at Chennai , this 9th day of November, 2004.

THIRU K. S. VENKATACHALAM , Industrial Tribunal WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Workman

W.W. 1 Thiru K. Masilamani

For Management

MW.1 Thiru A. M. Shamsuddeen

MW.2 Tmt . S. Surya

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Workman

Ex. WI 16-5-80 : Letter front M. Menzes to Thiru T.M. Thomas , General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai (xerox copy) .

181 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

Ex . W2 21-5-99 : Concession certificate issued to the Ex . M9 3/ 18-5-89 : Letter from Enquiry Officer to the

Petitioner worker intimating the enquiry conducted in his absence (xerox copy)

Ex. M10

:Report of Enquiry Officer (xerox copy)

Petitioner- Worker Thiru K. Masilamani by Civil Asst . Surgeon , Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Govt . General Hospital , Chennai (xerox copy)

Ex . M11 14-8-89 : Dismissal order issued to the petitioner-worker (xerox copy) Ex . W3 11-1-89 : Letter from Petitioner - worker to the Management requesting to allow him to continue in employment (xerox copy)

Ex . M12 25-9-89 : Appeal preferred by the petitioner- worker against the Dismissal order (xerox copy)

Ex. M13

Ex. W4 13-6-89 Letter from Petitioner - worker to the Enquiry officer (xerox copy)

:Extract of Register of Thumb Impressions relating to the petitioner-worker (xerox copy)

Ex . M14

Ex. W5 25-9-89 Appeal preferred by Petitioner- worker against the removal from service (xerox copy)

:Extract from copy of the LTI of the DSTE , Tambaram , Chennai -45 (xerox copy)

Ex . M15

Ex . W6 11-12-91 : Dispute raised before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Chennai -6 ( xerox copy)

:Register of Specimen Thumb Impressions (xerox copy) For Management

Ex . M16 6-2-88

Ex . Ml 24-6-68 Copy of Railway Board's letter regarding Disciplinary action for Acts of Misconduct (xerox copy)

: Letter from the Petitioner -worker to the Asst . Engineer, Spl . Works & Enquiry Officer Shoranu & Disciplinary Authority ( xerox copy)

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004 Ex . M2 24-12-80 : Railway Board's letter regarding employment of Casual labourers (xerox copy)

Ex . M3 Casual Labour Service Card of Petitioner-worker for the period from 20-9-78 to 21-12-79 (xerox copy)

का. आ. 49.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दी अमरीकन एक्सप्रैस बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Ex: M4 22-11-85 : Letter from Asst . Engineer , Shoranur to DSTE/ W / TBM intimating petitioner -worker and 8 others are not working as Casual labourers (xerox copy)

[सं . एल.-12014/4/2004- आई . आर. ( बी. I) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004 Ex. M5 11-12-85 : Reply by Senior DSTE/ W /TBM (xerox copy)

Ex . M6 11-9-87 : Charge-sheet issued to Thiru K. Masilamani the petitioner - worker (xerox copy)

Ex . M7 7-12-87 Enquiry notice issued to Petitioner- worker (xerox copy)

S.O. 49. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court Il , New Delhi as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of the American Express Bank Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 06-12-2004.

[No. L - 12014/ 4/2004 - IR(B . I) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

Ex . M8 5-4-88 : Letter from the Enquiry officer to the Petitioner - worker intimating the enquiry proceedings against the Casual labour ( xerox copy) 182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II NEW DELHI

R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer

Complaint Case U/ s 33A of the ID Act in ID No. 24/99

In the matter of :-

Sh . Bhartendu Rai and Others , Through Rashtriya Trade Employees Congress , Shop No. 17 , Pandav Nagar, New Delhii .

VERSUS

The American Express Bank Ltd. , 31-32 , Community Centre , Basant Lok , New Delhi - 110001 .

The parties have settled the matter o utside the court and they have filed their settlement . The matter has been verified in the Lok Adalat and both the parties have put signatures on the application in the Lok Adalat .

There is no dispute between the parties at present .

No dispute award is given .

Dt.: 01-12-2004

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 20:04

का. आ. 50.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दी अमरीकन एक्सप्रैस बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12011/10/1998- आई. आर. ( बी.- 1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II NEW DELHI

R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 24/99

In the matter of :-

Sh . Bhartendu Rai and Others ,

Through Rashtriya Trade Employees Congress , Shop No. 17, Pandav Nagar, New Delhi .

VERSUS

The American Express Bank Ltd. ,

31-32 , Community Centre, Basant Lok , New Delhi - 110001 .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12011 / 10/ 98 / 1R ( B - I ) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 31-12-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder: -

"Whether the action of the management of American Express Bank Ltd. ( IRS ) in not regularising the workmen S /Sh . Bhartendu Rai , Manoj Malhotra and Sunil Kumar w.e.f. 13-03-1996 , 01-06-1996 and 15-12-1995 respectively is just , fair and legal ? If not , what relief the concerned workmen are entitled and from what date ?"

The parties have settled their disputes outside the court due to persuasion in the Lok Adalat . They have filed the settlement and that has been verified and compared in the Lok Adalat .

There is no dispute between the parties at present .

No dispute award is given accordingly.

Dt.: 01-12-2004

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2004 S.O. 50. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . II , New Delhi as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of The American Express Bank Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 06-12-2004 .

[No. L - 12011/ 10/ 1998 - IR (B. -I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 51.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 122/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को06-12-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल. -12012/165/1996- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव 183

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005 / पौष 11 , 1926

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

governedby Sastry/ Desai Award as modified by the subsequent Bipartite settlements , which have statutory force.

S.O. 51. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 122/ 97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court - II , New Delhi as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-12-2004 .

[No. L- 12012 / 165 / 1996 - IR (DU) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

That as from 1-2-95 the workman proceeded on leave due to his illness . The workman submitted his leave application alongwith the relevant medical certificate to thebranch manager, as per his service conditions for which no acknowledgement is given by the bank as per the prevalent practice in the bank. The workman had to continue on long leave due to his illness and the circumstances beyond his control. He sent applications to thebranch from time to time under UPC. The photocopies for the UPC receipts are enclosed and marked as annexure 1 to annexure 4. The branch manager neither refused the workman's leave applications nor advised to him that he was overstaying his leave.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI

R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer .

L. D No. 122/97

IN THE MATTER OF :

That the workman had no reasons to believe that leave ofabsence is not being granted to him by the branch manager . As soon the workman recovered from his illness he reported at the branch but the branch manager did not allow him to join duties. The workman addressed a representation dated 26-10-95 to the Assistant General Manager region - II through the branch manager.

Sh . Sri Niwas Sharma

Through Sh . S. K. Patney, Circle President , State Bank of India Staff Association, A-50 , New Multan Nagar, Delhi-56

VERSUS

S.B.I. ,

That the workman had also submitted to the bank his medical fitness certificate from Dr. N.N. Tandon , MBBS , Samman Bazar, Bhogal , New Delhi mentioning the reasons of his absence from the bank. That the branch manager vide his letter No. 00594 dated 14-2-95 without making any reference to the workman's leave application asked him to report for duty on receipt of his letter . The workman sent a message to the branch manager that since he was not keeping well he may be granted leave. The letter did not mention anything about voluntary cessation ofservice.

Through the Asstt. General Manager , Region - II , SBI , Delhi Zonal Office , 11 - Sansad Marg , New Delhi -01 .

AWARD

That the bank sent to the workman yet another letter dated 2-3-95 enclosed as annexure - 8 and a letter dated 10-5-95 enclosed as annexure -9 . In bank's letter dated 10-5-95 the branch manager stated as under :-

"You are therefore hereby advised to report for duty The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 165/96 IR (DU) Central Government dt. 26-8-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication :

The point runs as hereunder :-

within 30 days of the receipt of this notice You are hereby requested to pay one month's pay and allowances within 15 days of the receipt of this notice Whereas the bank directed the workman to report for duty within 30 days of the receipt of the notice it directed the workman to pay one month notice within 15 days.

"Whether the action of the management of SBI in terminating the services of Sh . Sri Niwas Sharma , messenger deeming him voluntarily retired as per Bipartite settlement dated 10-4-89 is just fair and legal ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

Because ofhis illness the workman could not contact any body to advice to him the contents of the letter the same being in English. The workman being a messenger the letters should have been addressed to him in Hindi . The selfcontradictory letter/notice of the bank was illegal . The workman had no desire to leave the service of the bank.

The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that Sh. Sri Niwas Sharma messenger hereinafter referred to as the workman was working at Vijay Nagar , Delhi Branch . That the service conditions of the workman in the bank are 184

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

1 That the bank vide its letter No. 3019 dated 1-7-95 enclosed as annexure 10 addressed to the workman advised him that his services stood terminated from 10-6-95 . Whereas the workman was on leave due to illness the bank intimated to him that he stands retrenched from service as being voluntarily retired.

The bank neither gave any notice to the workman inconformity of the above settlement nor the case of the workman fell under any of the provisions of the above settlement . The workman had already informed the bank of the reasons of his absence . The bank neither refused leave nor held any enquiry in the matter so that the workman could have explained his position .

of the bank w.e.f. 10-6-95 . The copies of all the above referred letters/ notices are attached herewith . From this it can be observed that the employee was first asked to report for duty without delay and when he continued to absent himself from work for a period of more than 90 days consecutively then he was asked to report for duty within30 days of notice as per the above mentioned terms of service conditions . When he failed to report for duty within the aforesaid period, he was deemed to have voluntarily retired from service of the bank . It clearly shows that the bank has taken all the precautions and steps . It also celarly establishes that Sh . Sharma at the material time had no intention of joining the duties and the story forwarded by him is completely a concocted version.

The management has denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim .

That in terms of the bipartite settlement clause 17 will apply only in cases of desertion and in all other cases the bank may take action as per the provisions of para 521 of the Sastri Award r/ w para 18.28 of the Desai Award . The aforesaid instructions are clearly stipulated in bank's Cir.Memo No. PER/IR/ 49 /90 dated 22-11-90 a photocopy ofwhich is enclosed marked as annexure - 11 .

The claimant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder, he has stated that he was ill for 6 months so he could not report to duty. He sent five letters but the management did not inform him regarding his leave applications. The management even did not let him know that his leave applications have been rejected . He has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim .

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that the dispute raised by the SBI staff association over treating Sh . Sri Niwas Sharma, messenger as voluntarily retired from the service of the bank is devoid of any merits. Sh. Sharma has been treated to have voluntarily retired from service of the bank after observing the complete procedure as per the service conditions applicable to him . Sh . Sharma at the relevant time had no intention of joining the duties and had voluntarily abandoned his job but now it appears that he has subsequently changed his mind and just to cover up his earlier intention he has put up a concocted version that he was sick during this period. Actually he had never sent any application to the branch for grant of leave to him . No application as alleged by him was ever received atthe branch .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side ofthe management that he has filed medical certificate of 7-8-1995 , the receipt of which has been admitted but the contents have been denied which shows that the workman applicant submitted a medical certificate that he was ill from 1-2-1995 to 17-8-1995 . It was further submittedfrom the side of the workman that he had sent five registered letters to the management and in those registered letters , he had sent applications for medical leave . The applications are not on the record but the receipt of five registered letters are on the record and these are addressed to the Branch Manager of the bank . These five receipts show that the workman has sent applications to the Branch Manager .He has not filed the copies of those applications but the receipts prove that he has sent applications for medical leave to the Branch Manager, SBI . The workman applicant has not filed original receipts of the registered letters or any letter sent to the bank . He was absent from 1-2-1995 to 7-8-1995 almost for 6 months .

It has been submitted by the management that the workman applicant has admitted in his cross -examination that he received letters from the bank for reporting for duty. He did not send any medical certificate in response to the letters received from the bank . It was submitted from the side of the management that notice for 30 days was sent and he was asked to report to duty but he failed to reportto duty, he was compulsorily retired and thereafter he approached the bank .

Sh . Sharma started absenting from duty w.e.f. 1-2-95 . The branch vide its registered letters dated 14-2-95, 2-3-95 asked Sh . Sharma to report for duty at the branch but Sh . Sharma failed to attend duty in response to the aforesaid letters . After that vide its letter dated 10-5-95 the branch wrote to Sh . Sharma to report for duty within 30 days of receipt of the said notice and in case he fails to do so he shall be deemed to have voluntarily retired from service on the expiry of the said notice . This notice dated 10-5-95 was sent through registered post Sh. Sharma again failed to report for duty within 30 days of the receipt of the said notice . He also failed to submit any satisfactory reply to the said notice . That vide its registered notice dated 1-7-95 the appointing authority i.e. the Asstt . General Manager Region II wrote to Sh. Sharma that as he has failed to report for duty in response to the earlier notices of the branch dated 10-6-95 within 30 days so it wasdeemed that he has voluntarily retired from the service

My attention was drawn from the side of the workman to 1995-11 LLJ 242. It has been held by the [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Hon'ble Court that there cannot be an automatic termination or abandonment of service. Before termination ofthe services of the petitioner, the respondent bank was required to hold enquiry. Abandonment or relinquishment or deemed resignation from service are questions of intentions and such intention cannot be attributed to an employee unless there is adequate evidence in that behalf. To constitute abandonment of service or like, there must be total giving up of duties so as to indicate an intention not to resume the same .

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in JT 1998 ( 3 ) SC 47 has held that services of a permanent employee cannot be abruptly or arbitrarily terminated merely by giving requisite notice even if there is a stipulation in contract of service or standing orders .

Ithas been held in 1993 - II- LLJ 696 that a citizen's livelihood cannot be ended by an employer without following a fair, just and reasonable procedure. Hence under no standing order can an employer claim a right to automatically terminate the service of an employee who has gone on leave beyond the expiry what has been sanctioned . The employer consistent with the employees fundamental right to livelihood must give him an opportunity of putting his case against termination of service for unauthorised absence or its extension . In bipartite settlement referred to , there is provision that there must be the intention of the employee not to resume duties .

In the facts and circumstances of this case , there is no intention of the workman applicant that he has no intention to join the bank and when he was fit to resume duty, he went to the bank and has sent registered letters to the bank. He was residing at a nearby place and he was not so ill that he could not come to the bank and inform the bank regarding his illness . He should have sent applications alongwith medical leave but he has not done so as is apparent from his cross - examination . In the circumstances , there are delay and latches and negligence on the part of the workman applicant also so he is not entitled to get any back wages . However, he deserves to be reinstated with continuity of service and all the other benefits without any back wages . The law cited by the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case .

The reference is replied thus :

The action of the management of SBI in terminating the services of Sh. Sri Niwas Sharma , messenger deeming him voluntarily retired as per bipartite settlement dated 10-4-89 is neither just nor fair nor legal . The workman applicant deserves to be reinstated without any back wages butcontinuity of service from 10-4-1989 . He will avail of all the benefits as if he has not been compulsorily retired but he will not get back wages . The management is 3770G1/04-24

185

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

directed to reinstate the workman within one month from publication of the award .

Dt. 24-11-04

The Award is given accordingly. R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 52.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 40/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल .- 12012/127/1997- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December , 2004 S.O. 52. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court - Il , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-12-2004 .

[No. L- 12012 / 127 / 1997 - IR( B -I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 40/98

R. N. Rai . Presiding Officer .

In the matter of :

Sh . V. K. Beri S/o Sh . B. P. Beri , R/ o 78 , Loha Mandi , B. S. Road , Ghaziabad.

Versus

The Asstt . General Manager, State Bank of India , Region - II , Zonal Office , Garh Road , Meerut- 250001 . (U. P. ) 186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] AWARD

This Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 127/97 IR ( B . I ) Central Government dt . 06-02-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri V. K. Beri , Ex Clerk by way of discharging him from service w.e.f. 22-01-1994 is just , fair & legal ? If not what relief he is entitled to and from what date ?"

Kavi Nagar Branch. He was a biased person and henchman ofthe management . He was a cooked up witness and was produced to confirm the photocopies of the so-called documents filed by the Bank . The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that it is incorrect that the workman was placed under suspension on false , baseless and flimsy grounds . It is stated that the workman was suspended when his involvement in a case of fraud of Rs . 47,000 at the Kavi Nagar Branch came to the knowledge of the Bank . It is denied that the suspension of the workman was illegal . The averments made by the workman that he was shocked and suffered mental tension and tourture which affected his health adversely are wrong and denied . In any event he was himself responsible for his plight .

The workman has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman above named joined the services of the State Bank of India at Ghaziabad Main branch in October 1970 as Godown Keeper against permanent vacancy. That the workman appeared fork's clerical recruitment test held in 1972 and was selected for the clerical post by the Bank. He was relieved from the post of Godown Keeper at Ghaziabad Branch and posted as Clerk at Mawana Branch w.e.f. 24-04-1973.

That the workman was placed under suspension by the management vide their order dated 22-08-1991 on false, baseless flimsy grounds. As a result of illegal suspension the workman was very much shocked and suffered mental tension and torture which affected his health adversely. That the workman was issued charge sheet by the Disciplinary Authority, i.e. the Asstt . General Manager , Region- II , vide his letter dt . 16-09-1991 . The charges referred to in the charge sheet were false , baseless & concocted. The false charges were levelled with a view to victimize and harass the workman .

It is wrong and denied that the charges referred to in the charge sheet were false, baseless and concocted. The charge sheet was issued to the workman when certain misconducts and irregularities committed by him came into the knowledge of the management . As the misconduct ofthe workman were prejudicial to the interest of the Bank the charge sheet was issued to him. It is stated that the workman did not submit any reply to the charge sheet which was issued to him . The allegations made by the workman that the false charges were levelled with a view to victimize and harass him are wrong and emphatically denied. The workman has made only vague allegations . As the workman did not submit any reply to the charge sheet , an enquiry was constituted to enquire into the charges . Rest of the contents of this para are wrong and vehemently denied . The allegations made by the workman are false and baseless and hence denied. It is stated that the Enquiry Officer worked as an independent authority and the finding of enquiry were recorded by him based on the evidence placed before him. It is wrong and denied that the findings were recorded by the management and the Enquiry Officer was only a signing machine . The record shows that the enquiry was conducted observing the principles of natural justice and no prejudice whatsoever was caused to him .

That the management appointed Shri S. K. Dixit , as Enquiry Officer . Shri Dixit was a henchman of the management and a very junior official . He was biased and vindictive person by nature and the management had been entrusting him the job of Enquiry Officer or bank Representative in majority of the cases in the Region where the management had pre - decided to turn out the workman from the Bank. He was only a showpiece of the management and not working as independent Enquiry Officer . His findings were recorded by the management and he was only a signing machine . That the enquiry in this case was a sham show. The principles of natural justice were openly flouted by the Enquiry Officer .

Itis stated that the enquiry was held in consonance with the principles of natural justice . A bare perusal of the enquiry proceedings would reveal that the principles of natural justice were followed during the enquiry. It is stated that the management had produced the original documents in the enquiry proceedings and a copy of those documents were supplied to the workman. Full oppoutunity was given to the workman to verify the document supplied to him from the original documents produced by the management . The charges are fully borne outfrom the evidence on record of the enquiry proceedings .

That the management did not produce original documents in the enquiry despite repeated requests . They only produced photocopies of the documents which cannot be relied and accepted as evidence under the law. That the complainant was not produced in the enquiry. The entire charges were proved on hearsay evidence . That the Bank did not produce any witness to prove the charges . They only produced Shri Vijay Chhabra , Branch Manager ,

Itisstated that the charges were proved on the basis of testimony given by the witnesses produced in the 187 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

enquiry and the documents produced by the management . ofthe workman that Branch Manager produced evidence that he did not post a sum of Rs . 10,000 received on 25-7-1991 and did not post the same in the relative account . He has deleted the entries of Rs . 25,000 and Rs . 12,000. The enquiry officer has held that this could not be established beyond any doubt but the same stands proved. As such, while giving finding on charge No. 3 , the enquiry officer was of the clear view that allegations ofcharge No. B could not be established beyond any doubts but he has found the same proved on the ground of circumstantial evidence .

Abare perusal of the findings of the enquiry would reveal that the charges levelled against the workman were duly proved in the enquiry. The documentary evidence placed before the Enquiry Officer fully established the charges . It is stated that as admitted by the workman in the later part of the para Sh . V. Chhabra Branch Manager , Kavi Nagar was produced as management witness . It is wrong and denied that he was a biased person and henchman of management . It is wrong and denied that he was a cooked up witness and was produced only to confirm the photo- copies of the documents produced by him . The witness was examined by the Bank representative and was subsequently cross - examined by the defence representative of the workman .

It isincorrect that enquiry was done with a view to complete the formalities and to harm the workman . As stated earlier the enquiry was held in consonance with the principles of natural justice . The workman was given full opportunity to defend himself and he was represented by his representative during the entire enquiry proceedings . The workman was given full opportunity to cross-examine the witness produced by the Bank . He was also given the opportunity to produce his defence witnesses and documents to prove his innocence. The workman took more than eight months time to produce his defence witnesses and documents .

Itis stated that after the conclusion of the enquiry proceedings , the Disciplinry Authority considered the whole matter and tentatively decided to dismiss the workman and a show cause notice was issued to him . The workman was granted a personal hearing on 09-10-1993. Afterconsidering the submissions made by the workman in the personal hearing , the Disciplinary Authority took a lenient view and passed the order discharging the workman from service . It is wrong and denied that the orders of discharge were illegal , malafide and amounted to victimization . The Proposed punishment of dismissal without notice was converted into discharge . It is stated that the management considered his submissions made during the personal hearing and the order of dismissal was converted into order of discharge.

It was further submitted from the side of the workman that charge No. A is also not proved . The Branch Manager has identified the initials of the charge sheeted employee . He is not expert. It cannot be ascertained without any expert evidence whether the initials in questions are of the EPA. The enquiry officer has further mentioned that 20-05-1991 and 28-05-1991 were not the working days for the bank . It has been verified from the records in case 28-5-1991 and 20-5-1991 are not working days, it has not been made clear how the entries have been made on 20-5-1991 and 28-5-1991 . According to the sole witness , the Branch Manager , the entries dt.20-5-1991 , 21-5-1991 and 28-5-1991 for Rs . 10,000 , Rs. 12,000 and Rs . 12,000 cannot be authenticated by the EPA . The E.O. has held that 20-5-1991 and 28-5-1991 are not the working days . In case , these are not the working days , the charge cannot be found proved. The enquiry officer has also mentioned that it has been established that the above entires were superfluous in view of the above charge. In case, the entries are found superfluous , the charge should not be deemed to have been proved . As such , the findings of the enquiry officer on charge No. I are also not clear. Charge No. C is regarding not posting of the amounts received by the EPA . He is said to have received Rs . 10,000 on 20-5-1991 and Rs . 12,000 on 28-5-1991 . In case , these two days are not the working days , there is no question of receiving cash from the EPA . The charge cannot be proved for lack of defence witness . The charge is to be proved on the evidence of the enquiry whether defence witness is produced or not . The enquiry officer has based his findings on non - production of defence witness and not on the evidence in the enquiry proceedings.

The management has denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim and has stated that the enquiry washeld according to the principles of natural justice and the workman applicant was afforded proper opportunity to defend himself.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder , he has stated that only on the evidence of the Branch Manager, the enquiry officer found his guilt proved.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side

It was submitted from the side of the bank that proper opportunities have been given to the workman applicant and principles of natural jusitce have been followed. He was afforded opportunity to cross -examine the witnesses . Despite all these things , there must be sufficient evidence to find the charges proved. The Branch Manager has been examined and he has identified the initials of the EPA as well as the post of the EPA. The Branch Manager is not an expert witness in case oral witnesses other than the branch officer were not available , the report of handwriting expert must have been obtained 188

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 53.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 47/02 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-12-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12012/121 /2002- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2004

S.O. 53. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 47/02) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Mysore and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-12-2004.

[No. L - 12012/ 121/ 2002 - IR(B - I) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE

Dated: 30th November , 2004

PRESENT :

to ensure that the posting are in the handwriting of the workman applicant. The Branch Manager, the sole witness cannot identify the writing and the initials of the EPA as he is not an expert . As such , the enquiry has been concluded very hurriedly and sufficient evidence during the course of enquiry has not been collected. There is lack ofproper evidence to hold the EPA guilty of the charges . It is settled law that during domestic enquiry, a person can be punished on the basis of hearsay evidence and technicalities of the evidence act are not to be followed but even then there must be some cogent and reliable evidence on which a person of prudent mind can rely. It was further submitted from the side of the workman applicant that two days of which the posting are said to have been made , are not the working days of the bank so the question of receiving the amount and making entries does not arise . The Branch Manager has identified the writing of the EPA and his initials whereas the Branch Manager is not an expert witness regarding handwriting . In case handwriting is disputed, the report of the handwriting expert is essential or there should be sufficient oral evidence even hearsay evidence that the workman applicant received the amount and did not post on the date mentioned. Even if the amount was found inflated , it cannot be said that it has been written by the workman applicant as there is no charge that he withdrew any money and the account is not his own . The account was in the name of Smt . Neelam Gupta and Shri J. R. Gupta . It has not come in the enquiry why the EPA was interested in inflating the amount of account No. 10435. As such , there is no fraudulent design of the workman to inflate the amount unnecessarily and under what circumstances , the amount has been proved by the solitary evidence of the Branch Manager. As such, the enquiry stands vitiated , it is not fair and it is liable to be set aside . The law cited by the managementhent is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case .

Shri A. R. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer C. R. No. 47/02

The reference is replied thus :-

IParty :

Shri H. D. Riyaz Basha ,

C/ o Abdul Gaffar Sab ,

Agriculturist Masjid Mohalkla ,

2nd Block,

Madhugiri

II Party :

The General Manager, State Bank of Mysore , HeadOffice, K. G. Road,

The action of the management of the State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri V. K. Beri , Ex Clerk by way of discharging him from service w.e.f. 22-01-1994 is neither just , nor fair nor legal. The workman applicant deserves to be restored to the stage prior to the award of punishment . However, the bank may proceed with the enquiry and give his finding afresh after obtaining the report of the handwriting expert and after giving the workman applicant opportunity to adduce evidence in defence in the light of the observations made above . The observations regarding the procedure of enquiry would be followed by the Enquiry Officer.

Bangalore

The award is given accordingly.

AWARD

Dt.: 02-12-2004

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub-section 2A of the Section 189 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L- 12012/ 121 / 2002 /IR (B - 1 ) dated 21st August , 2002 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank ofMysore in terminating from services toMr. H.D. Riyaz Basha , as a temporary sub - staff is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ?"

in a public sector bank . It is further submitted that the Public SectorBank cannot be absorbing only its temporary and casual staff all the time for it will amount to denying employment to the deserving, from amongst the public which will amount to violation of articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, 1950. The Apex Court has squarely disapproved the back door entry into public service, which denies opportunity of recuitment in Public Sector and Government for aspiring members of the public, iftemporary and casual staff are routinely absorbed without open competition . The instant reference is liable to be rejected for all the above reasons and the second party prays accordingly.

2. After the receipt of the reference from the Government it was registered and RPAD notices were taken against both the parties . The first party workman has remained absent despite the services of said notice personally. Whereas , the management has been represented through counsel and it filed a Counter Statement opposing the said reference. The contentions taken by the management at para 2 to 5 of the Counter Statement run as under :

3. The first party was employed as temporary sub- staff on purely casual basis at different branches of the bank whenever permanent sub- staff were on leave or unavoidably absent . He was employed as such in different branches of the 2nd Party Bank as detailed below :

Branch

Year

No. of days worked

1981

Hagalawadi

-do-

1993

-do-

1994

-do-

1995

129

-do-

1996

Nittur

2001

Chelur

1996

2000

Doddaguni

Bookkapatna 1984

4. After the Counter Statement filed , the case was posted for evidence of the Second Party Management and it has adduced evidence of one Mr. K. Manjunath said to be working as Dy. Manager in the Industrial Relation Department at the head office of the Second Party Bank. Inhis affidavit, which has been filed by way of evidence as examination- in-chief, he averred that the first party was intermittently working on Temporary/ casual basis at different branches of the bank between 1981 and 2001 . He worked at the Hegalawadi branch during 1981 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995 and 1996 for 82 , 1 , 35 , 129 and 85 days respectively. Likewise , he worked in Nittur Branch during 2001 for 87 days and for 27 days in 1996 at Chelur Branch . Healso worked at Doddaguni and Blukkapatna branches during 2000 and 1984 for 189 and 75 days respectively. He further stated that the first party has not worked continuously for 240 days or more in any one of the said branches during any block period of 12 months . He stated that in fact the first party was called for interview for selection to the post of Permanent Sub - Staff but he was not selected by the Selection Committee as more meritted candidates were selected against the then existing vacancies . Therefore , the first party not being selected on merits , he cannot have any grievance . He could have tried for selection whenever applications were invited for appointment either from amongst the temporary staffwho were working with the bank and also from others and having not done so he cannot approach the court for any relief.

It will be obvious that between 1981 and 2001 he had worked as temporary sub- staff on casual basis only on 710 days averaging 35 days per year . Even the number of days worked during the several years in different branches of the Bank were not continuous but only temporary and casual depending on permanent sub-staff of the bank being on leave or unavoidably absent . It is submitted that the first party had never worked in any branch of the bank for 240 or more days in any block of 12 months warranting his absorption. In such a situation the question of applying Section 25 F of the ID Act does not arise for consideration . In fact, the first party workman was called for interview for selection to the post of permanent sub- staff but the selection committee did not select him as more merited candidates were selected as against the then existing vacancy which is unexceptionable

5. In his further ex - in - chief MW1 has spoken to the various documents produced by the management in support oftheir contentions taken in the counter statement as well as in his affidavit . The documents marked during the course of his further examination - in-chief at Ex.M1 to M8 are the true copies of the Attendance Register extract for the period from January 1981 to July 1999 , for the period from 1981 to 1986, for the period from March to June 2001 , for month of March and April 2001 , for the period between January 2000 and November 2000 , for the period from January 2000 to January 2003 , for the period from August 1996 to Novemenber 1996 and for the period from July 1984 to September 1984 marked at 190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

Ex . Ml to M8 respectively. There has been no cross- examination on the part of the first party , he having remained absent before this tribunal despite the service of notice , as noted above. Therefore , from the avernments made in the Counter Statement as well as in the affidavit filed by the management witness coupled with the documents marked before this tribunal at Ex M1 to M8 , itbecomes crystal clear that in none of the aforesaid years the first party has worked continuously for a period of 240 days and more so , as to challenge the action taken by the management in removing him from the service . Had he completed continuous service of 240 days or more in a calendar year particularly during the block period of 12 months immediately preceding his removal from service then certainly he could have challenged the action of the management on the ground that such a removal amounts to retrenchment and in the absence of compliance of the provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act , the retrenchment tantamounts to illegal termination to be set aside by this tribunal . Therefore , since the first party worked with the management just on casual basis intermittently, and since he has not fulfilled the requirements under Section 25B of the ID Act , the action of the management in removing him from service cannot be said to be illegal liable to be set aside by this tribunal.

6. Further ithas come in the evidence of MW1 that the first party was called for interview conducted by the management and he could not be selected on merits and therefore , he cannot question the action taken by the management after having failed to be selected in the interview conducted by the management . The contentions taken in the Counter Statement and the affidavit as well as the statement in examination - in - chief of MWI also have remained unchallenged and uncontroverted there being no claim statement filed by the first party and there being no cross -examination of MWI as the first party remained ex-parte. In the light of the reference point, though , the management has discharged its burden in disproving the claim of the first party by adducing oral as well as documentary evidence , it is unfortunate to note that the first party remained absent before this tribunal despite service of the notice , personally.

7. In the result this court has absolutely no option but to hold that the first party fails to establish his case much less his right to claim absorption into service of the management Bank . However, keeping in view of the fact that the first party has been working with the management intermittently and on casual basis for a period of more than 20 years , it appears to me that ends ofjustice will be met if he was provided with one more opportunity to participate in the next interview to be held by the management for the purpose of selection of Permanent Sub- Staff. Accordingly reference is answered and following award is passed.

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

The reference is dismissed subject , however with a direction to the management to afford one more opportunity to the first party to participate in the immediate next interview to be conducted by it for the purpose of selection of Permanent Sub - Staff of the Second Party Bank . No order to cost .

(Dictated to PA , transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me , on 30th November , 2004)

A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 54.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/01 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-12012/241/2001- आई. आर. ( बी. 1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December , 2004 S.O. 54. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (C.R. No. 78/ (01) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Mysore and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 6-12-2004 .

[No. L - 12012/241 /2001 - IR( B.I) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE

Dated 25th November , 2004

PRESENT :

Shri A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer . C.R. NO . 78/01

I PARTY

II PARTY

The Managing Director, State Bank of Mysore , HeadOffice, Kempegouda Road, BANGALORE - 560001 Shri K. V. Muniyappa , Major, Venkatarayappa, Kolavanahalli , Srirampura Post , Chikkaballapur Taluk, KOLAR DISTRICT.

191 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

AWARD

is entitled to the relief sought for, to be granted by this tribunal exercising its powers under Section 11A of the IDAct .

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L- 12012/ 241 /2001 /IR(B - I) dated 16th October, 2001 for adjudication on the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of Shri K.V. Muniyappa , former temporary sub - staff of State Bank ofMysore is justified in claiming continued regular employment ? If so , what relief the disputant is entitled ?"

3. The management by its Counter Statement however, contended that the first party was intermittently engaged on casual basis during certain periods depending upon the exigency of the work in the concerned branches and that such a temporary workman cannot be absorbed or appointed on permanent basis except through recruitment by open competition . It is inexplicable as to how the first party did not apply for direct recruitment whenever vacancies arose and applications were invited and had he so applied he cannot obviously have any grievance against the management; that no bulletin can either bind the management or any body can claim any right under any such bulletin unless the first party shows thathe has got a right for absorption without going through the direct recruitment process; that the management is not expected to continue the services of temporary casual workmen and to absorb their services when there is no work for such workmen . Therefore , question of management discontinuing the services of the first party w.e.f. 17-8-98 or any other date illegally, does not arise ; that even if the first party is physically handicapped person, he could only go through the normal direct recruitment process so that some consideration can be shown to him and he cannot ipso facto insist of absorption intodirect service when there is no vacancy or work . The management further denied the allegation of the first party that he worked continuously for a period of 240 days and more in a particular calendar year and that there was violation of provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act and that his termination amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2 (00) of the ID Act . It was also denied that there was any violation of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India in discontinuing the services of the temporaryworkmen. It was contended that merely because the first party is appointed on temporary basis and was empanelled for such a post he cannot claim entitlement forabsorption as Group ' D ' employee and therefore , this reference is liable to be dismissed .

4. During the course of the proceedings , the management examined one witness as MWI and got marked 3 documents at Ex. Ml to M3 . His statement in Ex - in-Chief is as follows :-

" I know the first party. I know the facts of the case on records . Ist party was working as temporary employee in our bank . He was temporary Watchman - cum- Peon . Attendance extracts are filed for the days on which he worked . Ex. M1 (21 sheets ) . He was engaged as temporary peon on casual basis whenever permanent staff went on leave . Ex. M2 is the extract showing the working of first party. First party worked 114 days in the year March, 1997 to 2. The case of the first party, as made out, in the Claim Statement, briefly, stated is that he worked with the Management Bank as a Temporary Watchman/Peon on casual basis from 7-1-1984 to 22-5-1984 and from 3-1-88 to 30-11-1988 . He approached the High Court in Writ Petition No. 9811/93 seeking a direction to the management for his absorption into the service for the said post on the strength of the Union Bulletin No. 18/91 dated 25-2-1991 . Considering the facts of the case , the High Court by an order dated 17-9-1996 disposed off the said petition with a direction to the management for including his name in the empanelment and consequently for his absorption , if he is otherwise found eligible . In pursuance of the said order of the High Court , the management once again re - engaged the first party into service for a period of 114 days i.e. from 21-3-1997 to 31-12-1997 and also 111 days during the year 1998 ; that the management instead of continuing the services of the firstparty and absorbing him into service , have illegally discontinued his services w.e.f. 17-8-1998 . He made several representations to the management to continue his services and also for absorption and since the management failed to consider his request , he initiated conciliation proceedings. resulting into the present reference; that the first party is physically handicapped person and he is entitled for absorption in the light of the official memorandum dated 30-12-1980 issued by the Govt. of India ; that even otherwise the first party having worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year, he could not have been removed from service without issuing any notice or payment of compensation in view of notice as per the provisions of Section 25F of the ID Act . Therefore, the action of the management amounts to illegal retrenchment as defined under Section 2( oo) of the ID Act; that the first party is legally entitled to continue the service and absoption as Group ' D ' employee which benefit has been extended by the management to others , similarly situated . Therefore , there has been a violation of Article 14 read with 16 of the Constitution of India; thaf the first party ever since the date of termination has not been gainfully employed elsewhere and therefore , he 192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

3 ( ii) ]

[PART II-SEC.

worked subsequent of my leaving the job . In 1991 they are namely Sathyanarayana , Ganesh and Nagappa. 1 request the court to allow my reference. "

6. I would like to refer to the statements of MW1 and WW1 in their cross - examination and the documents marked in their deposition as and when found relevant and necessary.

December , 1997. He never worked at anytime for 240 days continuously. In 1998 he worked for 88 days from 5-1-98 to 16-8-98 . Ex . M3 is another statement . In 1984 he worked for 89 days . The records are not available because they are 10 years old . Payment ès made through credit to SD A/ c of first party. In any year he has not worked for more than 240 days . In 1988 he was worked for 13 days . "

5. The first party on the other hand examined himself as WW1 and got marked 7 documents at Ex . W1 to W7. His statement in Ex- in- Chief runs as under :

7. Learned counsel for the first party, vehemently, argued that the first party who was removed from service somewhere in the year 1986 was once again taken back in service on temporary basis under the orders of the Hon'ble High Court in the Writ Petition referred to supra but he was again discontinued from service for no good reasons despite the fact that he was in the service of the management continuously for a period of 240 days and more there being artificial break of service in between . He contended that undisputedly the first party is a handicapped person and therefore, as per the above said union Bulletin he should have been continued in service and absorbed into service on permanent basis , particularly, whenhis name was included in the panel of the temporary workers under the orders of the High Court in the said WritPetition . He submitted that the removal of the first party from service without any enquiry and without the compliance of the provisions of Section 25 F amounts to illegal retrenchment and therefore , he is entitled to reinstatement with backwages with a relief of absorption into service as a regular employee .

8. Whereas , the learned counsel for the management argued that in the very admissions of the first party not only in the Claim Statement but also in his statement before this Tribunal , at no time he worked continuously for 240 days or more in a particular calendar year and therefore , question of retrenchment under section 2(00) of the ID Act and compliance of Section 25 F of the ID Act never arose . He contended that though the name of the first party was included in the empanelment as per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court and he was given opportunity to make an application in accordance with law for his absorption in service after conducting an interview to be held by the management , he failed to avail the said opportunity and therefore , he now cannot claim any right of continuity of service or absorption into service. Learned counsel , contended that the statement of first party that he had applied for the post by sending an application atEx . W4 and that the was not called for interview, merits no consideration as Ex . W4 was neither signed by the first party nor relevant columns were filled nor it was received by the bank so as to send interview call to the first party. Learned counsel contended that only because the first party happened to be the handicapped person , he cannot as of right claim regular employment or absorption "During the period from 7-1-1984 and 22-5-1984 and thereafter for about one month in the year 1988 I have worked as Watchman - cum - Peon with the Second Party. At the end of November month of 1988 somebody from the Head Office of 2nd party asked me not to come for work and that he should come to the work whenever being called by the Management in future . There was a notification by the Management to fill up the vacancies of Watchman- cum -Peon calling for the application and I had in response to that made an application for the said job. The said notification/bulletin was made in the year 1991. There was no interview conducted in pursuance to the said bulletin and my application was also not considered . My efforts to get back the job since failed I approached the High Court with a WritPetition. The High Court disposed the petition directing the management to provide me the job . I was take back in service on 21-3-97 and worked up to December , 1997 for a period of 114 days . During the year 1998 I have worked from 5-1-1998 to 16-8-1998 . From 21-3-97 till I was removed from service in the month of August 1998. I have worked continuously without any break in service but the management issued service certificate only for a period of 100 days in response to the circular issued by the Head Office . They have issued certificate to me for a period of 202 days for the year 1997-98 . The management refused employment to me on 17-8-1998 orally. There was no enquiry conducted against me nor any compensation was paid before removing me from service . Thereafter I approached the Labour office and raised the dispute and without work all along . I have produced the certificate as per Ex . W1 , for the year 1984 , Ex. W2 is for the year 1991. Ex. W3 is for the year 1997-98 . Ex. W4 is the Xerox copy of my application in response to the said bulletin . Ex . W5 is the High Court order on my Writ Petition . Ex . W6 is the said Circular . Ex . W7 is the Handicapped certificate issued by SNR Hospital , Kolar. The copy of Ex. W7 was given to the Management to consider the case I am being an Handicapped man . The management had made permanent services of other 3 cmployees who 193 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

into service unless he applied to the post in accordance with the recruitment rules and after having appeared in the interview was found suitable to the post .

there was an exigency of the work available , it just cannot be said that the break in service occurred during the period first party worked under the management was an artificial break and therefore , ignoring the said break he must be presumed to work continuously for a period of 240 days and more in a calendar year preceding discontinuation of his services . This being the position. The contention of the first party that the action of the management discondinuing his service tent amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2(00) of the act and that non compliance of provision of Section 25 F of the Act make the said action of the management illegal and entitling the first party the relief of reinstatement, backwages etc. has no substance. Now the next question to be considered would be as to whether the directions issued by the High Court in the said Writ Petition have been complied with by the management and whether the first party availed theopportunityof getting him selected by the management after his name having been empanelled in the list of temporary workers . In the operative portion, the orders of theHon'ble High Court in the said Writ Petition at para 5 run as under :--

"Following the aforesaid decision , this petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 & 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for including his name in the empanelment and for the consequent absorption if he is otherwise entitled, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order" 9. After having gone through the records , I find substance in his arguments. First of all the contention of the first party that he worked continuously with the management for a period of 240 days and more in a calendar year preceding his termination of services and therefore , the action of the management amounts to retrenchment under section 2 (00) of the ID Act and that there being no compliance of the provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act , his termination is illegal , has got no substance . At para 1 of the Claim Statement itself as noted above, it is stated that he worked hardly for 4 months in the 1984 i.e. From 7-1-84 to 22-8-84 and in the year 1988 he worked from 3-1-88 to 30-11-88 . In para 2 of the Claim Statement he came out with the case that after the above said Writ Petition was disposed of by the High Court , he was re - engaged by the management for the period of 114 days i.e. From 21-3-97 to 31-12-97 and also for 111 days during the year 1998. Admittedly, he was discontinued from service w.e.f. 17-8-98 . In his statement before this court again he stated that after his Writ Petition was disposed ofby the High Court , he was taken back in service on 21-3-97 and worked up to December 1997 for a period of 114 days during the year 1998 and he worked from 5-1-98 to 16-8-98 . He further stated that though he worked continuously from 21-3-97 till the month of August 1988 . He was removed from service and was given a certificate by the management only for a period of 100 days in response to the circular issued by the head office.

11. Therefore , as per the above said directions the management was directed to include the name of the first party in the empanelment and for the consequent absorption if he was otherwise entitled within the period of6 months from the date of receipt of the said order. It is notindispute that pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble High Court , the name of the first party was empanelled in the list of temporary workers . Now the question arises as to whether the first party was denied the absorption in the service despite the fact that he was otherwise entitled to the said relief. It is the case of the management that such a temporary worker whose name finds place in empanelment will be given opportunity to submit his application in response to the notification issued by the management and to participate in the interview and after interview, if he was found suitable , he will be selected . It is the further case of the management that despite such a notification inviting the applications of the temporary workers , the first party did not send his application and in the result, was called for interview and has not been selected when vacancy arose .

10. On the point of period of service rendered by the first party with the management as seen above , the management has also produced before this tribunal extract of Attendance Register and this evidence for the management again would disclose that the first party having been engaged on casual basis as a Watchman -cum- Peon never worked continuously for a period of 240 days and more in any of the calendar year much less in a calendar year immediately preceding to his removal from service. As noted above , the very averments made in the Claim Statement and the statement of the first party referred to supra and in the light of the statement of MW1 coupled with the documents marked on behalf of the management as extract of attendance register, it is very much evident and abundantly clear that neither in the year 1984 nor in the year 1988 , the first party worked continuously for a period of 240 days and more . He also did not work continuously for the above said period either in the year 1997 or in the year 1998. Keeping in view of the admitted fact that he was being engaged by the management on a casual and temporary basis when ever

12. Whereas , the first party in his statement before this tribunal referred to supra came out with a version that there was a notification issued by the management to 3770 G1/ 04-25 194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ]

را

Therefore, the contention of the first party that he in fact applied for the job as per the norms laid down by the bank but his application was not considered , seems to be without any basis lacking the proof. The management under the directions of the High Court was obliged to include the name of the first party in the empanelment and then to consider his case if he was found otherwise eligible for absorption in service . As seen above , the management performed its duty in obeying the directions of the Hon'ble High Court but unfortunately the first party did not act deligently in availing the opportunity of being selected as per the norms and rules of the bank meant for the said purpose . For the default he committed , he must blame himself and not the management . Merely because the first party happened to be handicap which fact is not disputed by the management and is proved in a medical certificate marked before this tribunal at Ex . W7 showing percentage of disability to the extent of 50 %, the first party ipso facto does not get any right for absorption into the service of the management . It was rightly contended by the management that had he applied for the post in response to the notification issued by the management and appeared in the interview then the selection committee certainly would have considered his case as a person handicapped. since he failed to apply for the job itself, much less , giving an interview, there was no occasion as such available to the Selection Committee to consider his case. In the result and for the foregoing reasons this court is left with no alternative but to hold that reference merits no consideration .

14. Further, taking into account the fact that the first party is a handicapped person and has been in the management since a very long time as a casual worker and the fact that his name has already been found in empanelment ( list of temporary workers prepared by the management) is appears to me that ends of justice will be met if he is given one more opportunity to participate in the next interview proceedings to be held by the management . Hence the reference is answered accordingly with the following Order.

ORDER

fill up the vacancies of Watchman- cum-Peon calling for the application and he had responded with an application for the said job . He further stated that the said notification/ bulletin was made in the year 1991 and that there was no interview conducted in pursuance to the said bulletin and his application was not considered. In his further examination- in- chief he stated that Ex. W4 is the Xerox copy of the aforesaid application . In his cross - examination the first party stated that Ex. W4 was forwarded to the bank by him through the Union Secretary and he further added to say that he had given one copy of Ex . W4 to the bank also but the Manager did not give him the acknowledgement. In his further cross - examination when he was confronted with the said application he was admitted that columns of Page 2 in the said application are left blank . In the last sentence of his cross - examination he also admitted that Ex . W4 does not bear his signature at a relevant place marked as Ex . W4A . Earlier to that he denied the suggestion for the management that no application was forwarded to the bank by the Union Secretary. Therefore , in the light of this background , it is to be seen whether the first party made an attempt to get himself selected through the proper procedure being adopted by the management , his name being included in the empanelment i.e. list of temporary workers . Undisputedly, there was a notification/bulletin issued by the management inviting the applications of the temporary workers in the said empanelment and it is the case of the first party that he had also applied in response to the said notification As seen above if we look into the statement offirst party as well as the very application at Ex . W4 one has to attach due weight to the argument advanced for the management that neither the management received the original of the said application nor the said application was in a proper format duly filled in . As , seen from the statement of first party as well as the columns on the reverse of the application they have been left blank without making any necessary entries in those columns . Strange enough , undisputedly, the said application does not bear the signature of the first party at the place meant for it (that portion in the application has been marked as per Ex. W4) .

The management is directed to provide one more opportunity to the first party in the immediate next interview to be held by it for the purpose of selection of temporary /casual workers as a sub - staff and to consider the case of the first party under the norms and rules prescribed for the said purpose . No order to cost .

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 25th November 2004) .

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer 13 As seen above , in his statement in cross- examination, first party says that he forwarded his original application through Union Secretary and also gave a copy ofthe said application to the Bank . Undisputedly there is no acknowledgement from the bank for having delivered the application . There is again nothing to be borne out from Ex. W4 that it was forwarded to the bank through Union Secretary. If the application was to be forwarded to the bank through Union Secretary then certainly, it must have atleast borne the signature of the Union Secretary.

195 [भाग ।।- खंड 3 ( i) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1, 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

vide Order No L- 12012 / 180 /2001 / IR ( B - 11) dated 24th January 2002 for adjudication on the following schedule.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of Dena Bank is justified in dismissing Shri D. N. NaraseGowda, Clerk from the services of the Bank ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

का. आ. 55.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रमन्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 07-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-12012/180/2001-आई. आर. ( बी. - 11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 7th December , 2004

S.O. 55. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref No. 7/2002) of the Ceutral Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court . Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Dena Bank and their workinen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 07-12-2004.

[No L-12012/ 180/2001 - IR ( B - 11 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated, 29th November, 2004

PRESENT:

Shri A. R. Siddiqui . Presiding Officer

C. R. NO . 7/102

I PARTY:

Shri D. N. Narase Gowda.

No. 11/1 , Ist Cross .

15th Main, Srinagar ,

Bangalore-560052

II PARTY :

The Managing Director ( Dena Bank).

Sona Towers. Ist Floor.

71. Millers Road,

Bangalorc-560052

2. The case of the first party on merits tpleadings on the point of validity and legality or otherwise of Domestic Enquiry dropped as finding on the said point is given separately) is that he joined the services of the management bank as a Subordinate Staff on 1-4-72 and thenwas promoted to the grade of Clerk w.c.f. 1-11-1980 He had put is more than 26 years of service having an excellent record through cut that the management bank placed the first party under suspension we.. 27-10-95 on the allegation that he bad stolen and fraudulently encashed the choques deposited for collection and lad made false entries in the relevant saving ledgers to cover up the acts: that thereafter even before issuing the charge- sheet , the management had recovered the amount covered by the cheques from the EPF loun amount of the first party; that after the recovery of said amount the management issued the charge- sheet dated 26-2-1996 alleging that the first party received 4 cheques aggregating the amount of Rs . 14565 for collection whereas after the receipt ofthe cheques , he had deliberately with malafide intention of defrauding the bank , did not specially cross them, nor entered in clearing register but stoien them and encashed them from the drawee bank and also made the false credit entries in the relevant Saving Bank Ledgers Account Folios and forged the inittals of checking officials etc, that the first party submitted his explanation dated 18-3-1996 denying the aforesaid allegations and the management not being satisfied with his explanation. conducted the Domestic Enquiry and ultimately on the basis of the enquiry findings , dismissed him from service by the impugned punishment order after having afforded the opportunity of personal hearing on 19-6-1998 . His appeal against the dismissal order was rejected for no good reasons In the rest of the Claim Statement. the firstparty also commented upon the oral anddocumentary evidence produced by the management contending that it was not legal and sufficient enough to hold him guilty of charges, more particularly, in view of the fact that the management had already recovered the entire amount covered under the aforesaid cheques with interest from the EPF loan amount on 21-9-95 itself much before issuing the charge-shect

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d ) of sub -section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 has referred this dispute

3. At para 10 ofthe Claim Statement, the first party submitted that the punishment of dismissal imposed on him is very severe. harsh and disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct leveled against him. having 3770G1/04-26 196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005/PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

led on behalf of the management , the learned counsel for the first party filed a memo conceding the fairness of the enquiry proceedings , reserving his right to challenge the enquiry findings and the findings of the Disciplinary Authority on the point of punishment. Therefore, in the light of the said memo, the issue raised on the point of Domestic Enquiry was answered in favour of the management holding that enquiry held against the first party was fair and proper and case came to be posed for hearing on perversity of the findings .

due regard to his past unblemished 26 years of service , more so , management was very much lenient in the cases of the officers Shri Achrekar working in Mumbai and Shri J. P. Sharma , working in Delhi who were dismissed from the service by the Disciplinary Authority and came to be reinstated in service by the Appellate Authority. At para 11 , it was contended that during the pendency of the reference on hand , there has been a settlement dated 10-4-2002 between the management of 52 A - Class Banks including the Second party bank represented by the Indian Banks Association and their workmen represented by the All India Bank Employees Association etc. and as per the above said settlement two new punishments have been incorporated for the gross misconduct committed by the workman and as per the clause 6 ( b ) of the said settlement punishment provided is removal from the service with superannuation benefits i.c. Pension/Provident Fund and Gratuity as pe clause 6 ( c ) punishment of compulsory retirement ach superannuation benefits has been introduced. Therefore , since the above said settlement has come into force during the pendency of the proceedings, the first party is entitled for the benefits arising out of the said settlement.

6. After having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties, the award is being passed. Learned counsel for the management in his argument submitted that the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first party having been held fair and proper, the only question tobe dealt with would be with regard to the perversity of the findings of the Enquiry Officer and since no fault has been found with the findings of the Enquiry Officer . much less being pointed out on behalf of the first party, the only conclusion to be drawn would be that the charge of misconduct against the first party has been proved and he is liable to be punished . It was argued that keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct i.e. misappropriation of the funds of the Second Party bank in the manner alleged in the charge sheet , the punishment of dismissal was quite proportionate and that no undue sympathy can to be shown to the first party. It was contended that the past record of the first party is nothing todo with the misconduct committed by him . Whereas , learned counsel for the first party submitted that the punishment of dismissal was very severe and harsh, particularly , in the light of the fact that no misconduct much less of the nature of the misconduct on hand committed by the first party, was committed by him during his long service of 26 years . Therefore , the learned counsel submitted that keeping in view the meager amount of Rs . 14,000 and odd said to have been misappropriated by the first party and his past excellent service record , this court under its discretionary powers vide Section 11A of the ID Act can take lenient view modifying the aforesaid punishment into the punishment of Compulsory Retirement or removal from service with superannuation benefits such as Pension , Provident Fund , Gratuity etc. in the light of the aforesaid settlement came into force during the course of present proceedings.

4 The management however, by its Counter Statement asserted and maintained to say that for the aforesaid misconduct committed by the first party, a detailed Domestic Enquiry was conducted against him and the Enquiry Officer after having taken into consideration the oral and documentary evidence placed before him, rightly recorded his findings holding the workman guilt of the aforesaid charges of misconduct. It was contended that the Enquiry Report was furnished to the first party with a proposed punishment of dismissal and after giving an opportunity of personal hearing and taking into consideration the reply given by him. the management , rather , the Disciplinary Authority keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party, legally and rightly upheld the proposed punishment of dismissal . It was contended that the appeal preferred by the first party against the impugned order was again rightly dismissed by the Appellate Authority. It was further contended that the punishment of dismissal is quite proportionate and incommensurate to the gravity of misconduct committed by the first party irrespective ofthe fact that he had unblemished service records and that the amount misappropriated in question was recovered from the first party even before issuing the charge sheet . Therefore , the management requested the court to dismiss the reference .

5. Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties on the point of validity, legality or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , this court framed a preliminary issue on the said point and called upon the parties to lead their respective oral and documentary evidence. When the matter was posted for evidence to

7. On going through the records , the oral and documentary evidence brought on record before the Eqnuiry Officer . the findings recorded by him , proceedings of the personal hearing , the explanation offered by the first party , the impugned punishment order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and also the order passed by the Appellate Authority, I find very much substance in the arguments advanced for the management that the charges of misconduct leveled against the first party have been proved by sufficient and legal evidence 197 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

11A of the ID Act to modify the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority if found to be excessive in comparing the gravity of the misconduct alleged against the workman . The principle laid down by their Lordship of Supreme Court and Hon'ble High Court in the decisions referred to supra and cited on behalf of the management , certainly, will admit a very little scope for this tribunal in exercising its power under Section 11A ofthe ID Act in interfering with the punishment awarded by the management against the workman particularly, when the charge of misconduct of misappropriation of the funds has been proved . Learned counsel for the management however , did not refute the contention of the first party that during the pendency of the proceedings on hand there has been settlement between the management representatives and so also union representatives and as per above said clause 6 (b) & ( c) two new punishments have been introduced in the course of misconduct committed by the employees . Therefore , keeping in view the length of service of 26 years rendered by the first partywith the management , his undisputed unblemished service records during the aforesaid period , and the amount of misappropriation involved in the case it will not be in the interest ofjustice to dismiss such a workman resulting into denial of superannuation benefits , which he could have got having retired from service in a usual course. In the result taking into consideration all these factors , it appears to me that ends ofjustice will be met if the punishment of dismissal is converted into punishment of removal from service with Superannuation Benefits such as Pension , Gratuityetc. Accordingly the reference isanswered and the following award is passed .

ORDER

and therefore , it cannot be said that it was a case of ' no evidence ' or ' insufficient evidence ' not to sustain the findings of the Enquiry Officer . A close reading of the findings of the Enquiry Officer would reveal that he has taken pains in analyzing and in appreciating the oral evidence in the statement of MWI and as many as 25.documents marked during the course of enquiry at Ex. MEX - 1 to 25. He has dealt it separately in detail and scrutinized the evidence brought before him on the charges leveled against the first party detailed in the charge- sheet issued to him and assigned very clear and cogent reasonings based on the evidence pressed into service by the management . He had come out with a clear finding that the charges of misconduct against the first party have been proved beyond any shadow of doubt . Based on the findings of the Enquiry Officer , the Disciplinary Authority had no alternative but to hold that the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer which were very much supported by the evidence as well as valid reasonings . The various grievances made out by the first party during the course of appeal as could be seen from the appellate order have been thoroughly discussed and sufficient reasonings are given rejecting almost all the contentions raised by the first party in challenging the findings of the Enquiry Officer as well as the order of Disciplinary Authority. Therefore , this court has absolutely no reason to disagree with the findings of the Enquiry Officer which are based on oral and documentary cvidence and supported by cogent and valid reasonings . Now, the only next question to be considered would be the quantum of punishment . Learned counsel for the management in support of his argument that the misconduct of the nature of misappropriation has been cstablished and the findings of the Enquiry Officer have been upheld, and therefore , this court is not supposed to go into the question of quantum of punishment , relied upon the various decisions of their Lordship of Supreme Court and a decision of our Hon'ble High Court as under:-

The punishment of dismissal awarded by the management is hereby modified as under : The first party is ordered to be removed from service with Superannuation benefits such as Pension, Provident Fund, Gratuityetc. No order to cost.

1. 2002-1 - LLJ 345 (DB) (Kar )

(Dictated to PA, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me , on 29th November , 2004) 2. 2001-1 - LLJ Supreme Court 1330

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer 3. AIR 2000 Supreme Court 3028

नईदिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004 4. 2000 - II - LLJ Supreme Court 1395

5. 1997 LAB.IC. Supreme Court 2649

6. 1995-1 -LLJ ( DB ) ( KAR) 1076

का. आ. 56.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 07-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/234/2000- आई. आर. ( बी. - 11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव 8. Learned counsel for the first party also referred to certain rulings on the point that if any amendment or settlement has been taken place between the parties during the course of pendency of the reference such amendment or settlement should be taken into consideration and also on the point that this court has got powers under Section 198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S.O. 56. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 07-12-2004.

[No. L - 12011/234/2000 - IR(B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated : 23rd November, 2004

PRESENT :

Shri A. R. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 3/01

I PARTY

II PARTY

The General Secretary, Syndicate Bank Employees Union,

7/2, 1st main. Sheshadripuram, BANGALORE - 560020

HeadOffice, TheGeneral Manager (P), SyndicateBank, P..B. No. 1 MANIPAL-576119

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12011 /234/2000/ IR (B - II ) dated 16th January, 2001 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the Syndicate Bank is justified in imposing the punishment of reduction of pay by two increments in respect of Shri S. Umesh , Clerk , Sirigere Branch ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

2. The case of the first party, briefly stated , covering the merits ( pleadings with regard to the validity and fairness of enquiry proceedings omitted there being a separate finding on the enquiry issue ) is that while he was working as a Clerk of the Second Party Bank was deputed to their Chitradurga branch to remit cash of Sirigere branch along with sub- staff Shri Prakash on 9-2-93 . Along with cash remittance work he was

instructed to take the closed envelop containing certain instructions/ letters by the Manager of his branch to be delivered at the Chitradurga Branch . The said envelop was originally meant to be dispatched under registered post but sent through him since he was proceeding to Chitradurga branch on remittance duty; while handing over the said envelope to Smt . Bharath Laxmamma, one of the Supervisory Staff with ( first party) was questioned as to why he preferred to bring a envelope supposed to have been sent by registered post . The explanation given by him was not accepted by Smt . Bharath Laxmamma and she started arguing . At this stage , the then Sub- Manager, Shri Devendranath intervened and started talking at high pitch of voice who was known for his losing patience , talking loudly while not listening to others having arrogant nature . A man of such a nature unneccessarily, dragged him into quarrel without knowing what was going on between him and Smt. Bharath Laxmamma . "That in spite of all this Shri Devendranath preferred to lodge a complaint against the first party and the matter was blown out of proportion for the reasons best known to him " that the management then issued a charge- sheet- cum- show- cause notice alleging that first party was shouting at high pitch inside the branch on 9-2-93 at about 2.30 p.m. in the presence ofSmt . Bharath Laxmamma and that Shri Devendranath told him not to shout but the first party shouted saying that "this is his tone, he cannot help it, he is the employee of this bank " . " He does not care for anybody, who are you to tell me to talk in a low voice " . The management termed it as misconduct of indecent behaviour on the premises of the bank vide clause 19.5 (e) of the Bipartite Settlement . The management further insisted that the first party must admit the misconduct voluntarily with a punishment of stoppage of next two increments with cumulative effect to be imposed upon him ; that the charges levelled against the first party could not be proved during the course of enquiry taken place on 1-2-1994 at Chitradurga for the reason that Shri Kotrappa , an advocate who was examined as MW 1 for the management as an eye witness to the incident and through his letter at Ex . MEX 3 did not support the case of the management except to say that contents of this letter were correct ; that the second witness for the management namely, said Devendranath also did not support the case of the management as according to him he had left the branch at about 2.30 P.M. on 1-2-1994 ; that Smt . Bharath Laxmamma was deliberately not adduced as witness for the reasons best known to the management whose evidence was quite essential to prove the charge of misconduct and the alleged incident in question . That the letter dated 15-2-93 ( MEX 1 ) which was written by MW3 was not at all there in the branch at the material time on 9-2-1993 . Whereas , the letter at Ex. MEX -3 said to have been written by the said Kotrappa was brought in picture on 17-3-1993 nearly after 2½ months of the 小 199 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11, 1926

waywasdisproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct committedby the first party.

reported incident ; that the Disciplinary Authority, entirely, relied upon the report of the Enquiry Officer whichwas found to be perverse one. The submission made by the first party during the course of personal hearing were not taken into consideration therefore , the punishment otherwise proposed carlier was imposed upon the first party. That the written submissions dated 25-6-94 submittedto the Appellate Authority, General Manager (P) Syndicate Bank , Head Office, Manipal was disposed ofwith a reduction in punishment to " stoppage of next two increments with cumulative effect " which punishment is not only harsh but also unwanted in as much as charges ofthe misconduct could notbe sustained under the circumstances narrated above and hence the punishment is liable to be set aside by restoring the increment that has been stopped with cumulative effect.

3. The management by its Counter statement however , denied the various allegations made in the Claim Statement of the first party and asserted that the above said charges leveled against the first party have been proved with sufficient and legal evidence during the course of enquiry and that the enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer was supported by valid reasonings and the oral and documentary evidence. It was contended that keeping in view the nature of misconduct the first party deserved the punishment of " stoppage of 2 increments m his pay seale with cumulative effect" but onhis appeal a lenient view was taken and the punishment was reduced to " stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect " which punishment is very much proportionateto the gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party Therefore, management requested the court to reject the reference .

4. Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties on the point of validity and legality of the enquiry proceedings , this court framed a Preliminary issue, as to whether the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper

6. Before admitting upon the merits of case, it is tobe made clear that as per the schedule of the reference the punishment imposed upon the first party is reduction ofhis payby two increments and whereas it is not disputed by both the partics that the punishment of reduction of payby two increments was modified by the Appellant Authority and the punishment was reduced to reduction of pay by one increment Therefore, it is in this background we have to see whether punishment of reduction of pay by one increment imposed by the management was justified or not under the circumstances ofthe case. Learned counsel for the first party vehemently argued that the charge of misconduct leveled for the first party itselfis not being established during the course of enquiry, the findings of the Enquiry Officer suffered from perversity not being based on legal and sufficient evidence.He contended that when the findings suffered from perversity, the disciplinary authority commutted illegality in acting upon those findings and imposing the punishment called in question. He contended that the nature of quarrel which said to have been taken place at the time and the date alleged was quite tritle in nature there being some exchange of hard words between the first party on one hand and Snit Bharath Laxmamma and the said Devendranath on the other and therefore, Shri Devendranath was not justified in reporting the said incident holding the first party alone responsible for the incident on hand resulting into Domestic Enquiry and the punishment in question. He further submitted that the punishment of reduction of pay by one increment with cumulative effect awardedby the Appellant Authority was quite harsh and excessive keeping in view the nature of misconduct alleged to have been committedby the first party.Whereas, the learned counsel for the management argued that the charge of misconduct has been proved beyond any shadow of doubt in the oral and documentary evidence produced in the enquiry. He contended that the testimony ofMW2 , namely, Shri Devendranath speaking to the fact that he/first party not only shouted in high pitchwhile talking against Smt. Bharath Laxашина buthe also misbehaved with him in the manner disclosed in the charge sheet, and this charge was established, was the evidence by sufficient , legal and satisfactory not only to be acted upon by the Enquiry Officer but also, the Disciplinary Authority, he submitted that if for a memo the statement of MWI namely Shri Kotrappa is ignored though he admitted the contents of the letter in Fx. M3. the statement of MW2 cannot be rejected particularly when the incident in question was not disputed by the first party nor he attributed any motive against the said witness . On the point of purushment . learned counsel submitted that a lenient view has already been taken against the first partyby the appellate authority by 5. During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined one witness MWI and got marked documents at Ex . MI to Mo and whereas no oral or documentary evidence was adduced on the party of the first party. After hearing the learned counsels for the respective parties this court recorded a finding on the said issue in the affirmative holding that the Domestic Enquiry held against the first party was fair and proper. Now therefore, in the light of the finding of this tribunal on the aforesaid Preliminary Issue, the only question which arises for our considerationis whether the enquiry findings suffered from perversity and that the order of punishment of Disciplinary Authority/Appellant Authority suffered from any illegality or that the punishment awarded by the Appellant Authority in any

3770G1/04-27 200

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

Chitradurga Branch who was very much involved in the incident hand. The version of the incident he gave before the Enquiry which has been brought out on page 3 of the enquiry findings , relevant for the purpose is as under :

imposing the punishment of reduction of pay of the first party by one increment while modifying the punishment ofDisciplinary Authority of reduction of pay by two stage. Therefore , no further lenient view is deserved by the first party.

" Shri P. D. Devendranath , Sub -Manager , Chitradurga Branch (MW2 ) , in his evidence , deposed that he knew Shri Umesh , CSE working atSirigere Branch . He also identified the copy of his letter dated 9-2-93 as the one written by him and also bears his signature. On 9-2-93 , MW1 approached him and enquired about the rate of interest on deposits . During such enquiry, he heard some heated argument being exchanged between the CSE Smt. Bharata Laxamamma , the then Special Assistant at the Branch . Thereafter, the CSE came to his table , at which time also , he was continuing his arguments with the Special Assistant. At that juncture , I advised him to tone down his voice and also assured to sort out the problem, if any. Agitatedby the above , he retorted saying " This is the tone of my voice , I am an employee of this Bank . Who are you to tell me to speak in a low voice ? I do not care for anybody. " Thus , he continued his argument in high pitch of voice without expressing his problem, unmindful of the presence of the customers . At that time Shri Kotrappabeing unhappy over the incident left the branch . It was at that time around 2.30 PM, when the branch staff left for lunch along with the CSE . He also stated that he stood by the contents of his letter dated 9-2-93 . "

7. On going through the records, more particularly, the evidence brought on record before the Enquiry Officer, the findings given by him and the findings of the Disciplinary Authority, I do not find substance in the arguments advanced for the first party that charge of misconduct levelled against him was not proved and that enquiry findigns suffered from any perversity. Of course , as could be revealed from the reading of the testimony MW1 to MW3 examined before the Enquiry Officer which also have been brought out in the enquiry findings by the Enquiry Officer, there is much substance in the arguments advanced for the first party that testimony of MWI , Kotrar and the testimony of MW3 , the then Manager, Chitradurga Branch is not very much helpful to the management to prove the charges of misconduct against the first party. First of all Shri Kotrappa had given his letter with regard to the incident in hand on 17-3-1993 whereas the incident took placee on 9-2-1993. Although he stood with the contents of the said letter in hisdeposition before the Enquiry Officer , he did not speak to the incident alleged to have been taken place in his presence narrating the same manner in which it has been brought out in the charge sheet . A close scrutiny of his statement before the Enquiry Officer would disclose that he was not present in the chamber of the Sub - Manager, MW2 when the first party misbehaved with him in the manner stated in the charge sheet . Statement of MW1 was relevant just for the purpose that there was some verbal exchange between the first party and Smt . Bharath Laxamamma when he brought the aforesaid evelop to the Chitradurga Branch which was supposed to be sent through registered post . He uttered no single word to suggest that first party misbehaved either with Smt . Laxamamma or with the Sub - Manager , Devendranath , therefore, merely because Shri Kotrappa gave a letter reporting the incident , that too, after a gap of more than 35 days and stood with the contents of the letter in the enquiry, it can not be said that he was eye witness to the incident and his evidence before the Enquiry Officer would help in proving the charge of misconduct against the first party. As far as MW3 is concerned, he was the thenManager of the said Chitradurga Branch, admittedly, away from the branch at the relevant point of time and in his deposition before the Enquiry Officer he was just to speak about the complaint given to him at Ex . M1 , reporting the incident. He was not supposed to say beyond that and even if he said it carries no evidentiary value in the eye of law. However, as argued for the management it is very difficult to dislodge or discard the statement of said Devendranath , the Sub- Manager of the said

8. Therefore , on going through the above statement ofMW2 , it cannot be said that evidence given by him is not legal and sufficient enough to prove the charge of misconduct levelled against the first party. This evidence in the statement of MW2 cannot be discarded for any good reason . First , of all he is the responsible officer of the Second Party Bank and secondly there was absolutely no motive attributed to him for making such a statement before the Enquiry Officer against the first party. Therefore, in the absence of any motive attached to the statement of MW2 and the fact of incident as such not being disputed by the first party, it is very difficult to appreciate the contention raised by him that he was unnecessarily brought in trouble . It is true that said Smt. Bharath Laxamamma was the most competent witness to speak to the incident and ought to have been examined on the part of the management but non- production of her as witness , cannot take away the effect of evidence of MW2 who was much more competent to speak to this incident as it was he who asked or requested the first party to tone down his voice and it was he who was misbehaved by the first party in not giving hope to his words rather going a step further in saying that he is like that only and that he does not care anybody.

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

Therefore, the evidence brought in the statement ofMW2 before the Enquiry Officer even if not corroborated by the statement of said Kotrappa supposed to be an independent witness will not loose its significance and importance rather the evidentiary in the eye of law to be ignored and to be dislodged on that count alone .

9. In the result this evidence of MW2 in my opinion issufficient , legal and convincing to hold that the charge ofmisconduct against the first party stands proved.

10. Now coming to the quantum of punishment , 1 find force in the submission made by the first party that for the misconduct of the nature on hand, the punishment of reduction of his pay at one stage, that too, with curmalative effect was very much on brigher side not commensurate to the gravity of the misconduct, particularly, in view of the fact that both Smt. Laxamamına and Shri Devendranath also contributed their mite in blowing the incident on hand outofproportion. She was not very much justified in refusing totake the said envelop which has been brought by hand by the first party to deliver at her branch , particularly, when he has come to the branch on remittance duty.

11. As could be seen from the Statement of MW2 he is also in the nature of raising his voice and that appears to be the reason for retort by the first party. However, first party cannot be allowed to justify his misbehaviour on the ground that MW2 also behaved in the same fashion, he being senior to him in the cadre . In the result keepong of these factors and taking into account the circumstances which gave rise to an incident onhand, It appears to me that ends of justice will met if the punishment of reduction of pay of the first party reduced by one stage is further modified as " stoppage of one increment for a period of 4 years from the date of original punishment Order " Accordingly the reference is answered and following award is passed.

AWARD

The order of Appellate Authority dated 3-9-94 is hereby modified as under:

The punishment is reduced to the stoppage of one increment in the pay of the first party for a period of 4 years w.e.f. Disciplinary Authority's Order dated 4-5-94.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 23rd November, 2004)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

का. आ. 57. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध

201 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 60/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/121/2002- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December, 2004

S.O. 57. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 60/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cuni-Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 7-12-2004.

[No. L- 12012/121 /2002- IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: 30th November 2004

PRESENT

A.R. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer

C.R. No. 60/02

1Party

IHParty

Shri Hanumanthaiah,

C/o Malakka, Akirampura Post , Koratagere Taluk. Tumkur District.

The Assistant General Manager, SyndicateBank , ZonalOffice, P.B. No. 9947, Gandhinagar , Bangalore-9.

AWARD

1. The Central Governinentby exercising the powers conferredby clanse ( d) of sub - section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012/ 121 /2002 (B - 11 ) dated 23rd October 2002 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Syndicate Bank is justified by dismissing Shri H. Hanumanthaish Clerk from services w.e.f. 3-6-1997 ? If not, what relief he is entitled to and from which date ?

2.After the receipt of the reference from the Government, it was registered and notices were taken against both the parties. The management in responseto the notice , appeared through counsel and whereas the first party remained absent before this tribunal despite the 202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

Punjab National Bank, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 7-12-2004.

[No. L- 12012/108/94 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

service ofthe notice personally.However, opportunity was given to the first party to file his Claim Statement and since it was not filed by him the matter came to be posted for the Counter Statement to be filed by the management . It also failed to do so . In the result the following award is being passed.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI

R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 84/94

In the Matter of :

Sh . Ramesh Kumar, R/ o C - 1131 Tigri , New Delhi -62

Versus

PNB,

Connaught Circus, New Delhi .

AWARD

3. As noted above , the first party has remained absent despite the service of the notice . Although the reference on hand has been made to this tribunal in the year 2002, the first party made no attempt to know the fate of the reference nor he responded to the notice issued by this tribunal despite the fact that it was served upon him personally. Of course, in the light of the frame of the reference point , primary burden cast upon the managerment to justify its action in dismissing the first party from his services but this burden ought to have been discharged or the management have been called upon to discharge its burden only in a case when the first party appeared before this tribunal and staked his claim by filing his Claim Statement . It is the first party to file his claim and to make out his case as to how the dismissal on the part of the management was not legal and justified . He having failed todo so, the only inference to be drawn would be that the first party is no more interested in going ahead with the reference proceedings on hand. In the result reference is answered accordingly with the following award .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 108/94 - IR (B - II ) Central Government dated 26-07-1994 has referred the following point for adjudication .

to cost. Reference is rejected for non - prosecution . No order

The point runs as hereunder:

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 30th November, 2004. )

"Whether the action of the managerment of PNB , NewDelhi in dismissing Sh. Ramesh Kumar, Clerk from service w.e.f. 1-11-93 is justified ? If not, what relief the said workman is entitled to ?"

A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर, 2004

The claimant has filed statement of claim. In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman was appointed on 15-11-85 as a Clerk in the PNB having its branch office at Sarvodaya Enclave , New Delhi vide letter dated 21-10-85 . That during the entire service period there was not a single complaint against the workman/ applicant and the applicant/ workman was working with the fullest satisfaction of the management .

का. आ. 58.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/94) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-12012/108/94- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2004

That as per the false allegation levelled against the innocent workman/ applicant by the management/ respondent and customer named Sh. Hitesh Bhatnagar . Sh . Hitesh Bhatnagar made a written complaint to the manager , PNB situated at Sarvodaya Enclave on 31-12-89 that the father of Hitesh Bhatnagar named Mr. N.K. Bhatnagar deposited two cheques ( bearers ) in his account in the same bank bearing A/ c No. 7551 of Rs . 3,000 each .

That in pursuance to the aforesaid false complaint made by Sh. Hitesh Bhatnagar the Manager PNB named S.O. 58. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 84/94 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 2 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the management of [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

K.K. Dhawan issued a letter to the innocent applicant/ workman on 11-2-90 seeking there in the clarification regarding the aforesaid falsely alleged cheques . In reply to the said letter the applicant/workman submitted the reply letter to the Manager PNB regarding the aforesaid falsely alleged cheques stating therein that cheques received on the relevant dated i.e. 31-12-89 the applicant/ workman had handed over all the cheques to the Manager as the concerned officer Ms. Mathur was on leave on the same day.

That two preliminary enquiries were conducted by the management , the first one on 18-2-90 and the second on 7-4-90 . During the period of two enquiries the applicant/workman was forced and intimidated to sign on the blank plain papers with a plea to tally his signature with the letters of signatures made on the cheques which had been encashed from the concerned State Bank .

That it is further fabricated and falsely alleged against the workman that another cheque stated to be misappropriated amounting to Rs . 5,000 (Rupees five thousand only) bearing cheque No. 954528 dated 22-11-89 was also thrust upon the innocent workman/ applicant for which Ms. Mathur, the permanent cheque receiving officer of the bank was responsible for the pilferage of the cheque amounting to Rs . 5,000 (Rupees fivethousand only) . Even Ms. Mathur was made free from the allegation made against her and in her place the innocent applicant/ workman was fixed the fabricated false charges of allegation not only the pilferage of two cheques amounting to Rs . 3,000 each but also the amount of Rs . 5,000 .

It is respectfully submitted that Ms. Mathur, the regular cheque receiving officer of the bank was left and the innocent applicant/ workman was directed by the bank management without any office order to discharge the duty of cheque receiving . The applicant/workman had to sit onthe seat of the cheque receiving counter for two hours only.After collecting the cheques the applicant/ workman handed over all the cheques to the Manager alongwith the cheque deposit register.

That after receiving the complaint from H. Bhatnagar the branch Manager Mr. Dhawan lodged a written complaint to the concerned police station on 9-4-90 . That on 9-4-90 the management also lodged a complaint against Ms. Mathur on the charge of pilferage of cheque amounting to Rs . 5,000 which has now been put in cold store without any enquiry or any police investigation or any judicial proceedings in respect of the cheque amounting to Rs . 5,000.

That on 23-5-90 the applicant/workman received a suspension letter wherein it was clearly stated that the applicant/workman is responsible for missing of three cheques . Thereafter the applicant/ workman received

203

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

suspension letter dated 23-5-90 . That the false allegation are not on the basis of pilferage of Rs . 6,000 but also of the fabricated cheque amounting to Rs . 5,000. The allegation of pilferage of Rs . 5,000 cheque was against Ms. Mathur .

That without considereing the reply to the false undated charge sheet the management conducted the departmental enquiry consitituted by V.K. Mehrotra Manager and Mr. Mehrotra conducted the said enquiry without following the basic norms of enquiry and without giving appropriate opportunity to the innocent applicant/ workman to defend his cause in the enquiry proceedings . That the workman represented to the Regional Manager that the Enquiry Officer was biased but the Regional Manager did not look into the matter as the Regional Manager had already conducted the departmental enquiry byhimself in person throughout the malicious suspension period as and when the workman visited the office ofthe Regional Manager and had always been asked the workman every time to come after 2/3 days in spite of knowing that the workman is innocent in the matter.

Thereafter the Regional Manager re -examined the complete case carefully and reinstated the workman in his post after revoking the malicious suspension order on 31-5-91 that was passed by the in competent Authority. It is further submitted that although the workman and or his defence assistant was present on 3-7-92 , 31-7-92, 26-8-92 , 19-11-92 and on 17-12-92 at the time offalse, malicious and vexatious legal proceedings instituted due to atrocities on false frivolous and fabricated evidence . And on 17-12-92 the biased enquiry officer forced the workman to sign on the blank sheet of proceedings and did not like of stating the highly deep rooted conspiracy of the managment .

The following charges have been framed :

On 31-12-89 Sh . Hitesh Bhatnagar deposited the following bearer cheques for collection and credit to his SF A/ c No. 7551 maintained jointly with his wife Mrs. Shalini :

Amount Drawn on Cheque No.

Date of cheque

14-12-89

853855

3,000

SBI Defence Colony, New Delhi 853874 27-12-89

-do-

3,000

while working as clerk/ cashier at BO : Sarvodaya Enclave , New Delhi on 31-12-89 , you received these cheques and contravened the following bank's procedures:

-you did not affix banks crossing stamp partly on the counterfoil and partly on the relevant voucher in lieu of having received the voucher alongwith cheque.

204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] -You did not sign the counterfoil in lieu of having received the instrument .

practice in lieu of having received the cheques . He did not also sign the counter - foil in lieu of having received the instruments .

-You did not enter these cheques in the outward clearing register.

Due to your aforesaid acts of violation of bank's procedures the cheques have been got encashed at the counter of SBI , Defence colony, New Delhi the drawee bank . Thus the bank has suffered a financial loss of Rs . 6,000 .

(2) The workman applicant did not enter these cheques in the outward clearing register . These were salary cheques and when the account holder checked his account with the branch he found that the proceeds of these cheques had not been credited to his account and accordingly he lodged a complaint . These were bearer cheques and it was found that the same had been encashed at the counter of SBI , Defence colony the drawee bank .

Your aforesaid acts of omission/commission reveal that you performed your duties with gross negligence due to which bank has suffered a financial loss and tantamounts to gross misconduct in terms of para 19.5 (j ) ofbipartite settlements .

Inview of the above he was placed under suspension w.e.f. 23rd May 1990. However on reviewing his case based on his representation the suspension orders were revoked vide order dated 31-5-91 reserving the right of the management to take disciplinary action against him in the said matter.

You are advised to submit your reply towards the above charge sheet within three days of receipt hereof failing which it will be presumed that you have nothing to say in the matter and the bank will be at liberty to proceed further as deemed fit .

Thereafter the workman applicant was served with a charge sheet for contravening the bank's procedure as stated above . Since no trial had commenced even after one year of suspension , it may be added that an FIR was lodged by the bank regarding the pilferage of these two cheques . The reply to the charge sheet submitted by the workman applicant was not found satisfactory by the disciplinary authority and accordingly enquiry was constituted to look into the truth of the allegations levelled against the workman applicant . It may be mentioned that the charge sheet was issued after awaiting the outcome of the Police investigations on the FIR lodged and when it was found that even after a lapse of one year there was no progress charge sheet was issued and enquiry committee was constituted on 4-12-91 .

During the enquiry it was found that Sh. Ramesh Kumar remained absent on most of the dates without information and on one particular date i.e. 17-12-92 he left the venue of the enquiry without signing the proceedings for the day. Out of the 14 dates of enquiry he remained absent on 8 dates .

The management has filed written statement. In the written statement , it has been stated that the service conditions ofbank employees are governed by the various awards/ settlements as amended from time to time. Chapter 19 of the bipartite settlement deals with the disciplinary action against those employees who commit acts of misconduct as defined in the chapter. Bank had taken disciplinary action against Sh . Ramesh Kumar for gross mis-conduct in consonance with the provisions of the above chapter and a fair and proper enquiry was held giving reasonable opportunity to him to place his defence as per the principles of natural justice . The disciplinary authority imposed the punishment of dismissal after considering the matter placed on enquiry record and applying its mind . Opportunity of personal hearing was also afforded and keeping in view the circumstances and the gravity of the charges found established the punishment of dismissal was imposed on Sh . Ramesh Kumar. He also preferred an appeal which was rejected by the appellate authority. Since the action taken by the bank was as per the provisions of the bipartite settlement and principles of natural justice the same cannot be questioned.

In the written statement, the management has denied that the Enquiry Officer was prejudiced and sufficient opportunity has not been given to the workman applicant . He has not been afforded ample oportunity to defend himself.

One of the customers of the bank deposited two cheques of Rs . 3,000 each dated 14-12-89 and 27-12-89 in their S /F A/ c No. 7551 maintained at BO Sarvodaya Enclave Sh. Ramesh Kumar the workman applicant was a clerk-cum-cashier and on that particular day he was receiving the clearing cheques . While receiving these cheques he contravened the bank's procedures as under :

The claimant has filed rejoinder . In his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his claim . Both the parties have adduced evidence and the award is given on the entire evidence i.e. evidence added during enquiry and evidence adduced in the court .

(1) the workamn applicant did not affix bank's crossing stamp partly on the counter- foil and partly on the receiving vouchers as is the

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

of the workman applicant that he was not given proper opportunity to cross - examine the witnesses of the management, He was not afforded opportunity to defend himself. He was acquitted from the trial court . The chargesheet has been issued on false and vague allegations. The same alleged conduct was performed by Smt . Pushp Lata but no action was taken against her. The workman belong to scheduled caste- so in order to harass him, the management has conducted the enquiry when final report was submitted to the court . There is no question of conduct ofdomestic enquiry. The management respondent should honour the verdict of the court. It was further submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant worked as clerk/ cashier and while working on clearing seat at Branch Office, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi on 31-12-1989 , he received two cheques for Rs . 3,000 each drawn on the State Bank of India, Defence Colony, New Delhi for collection in the S.P. Account No. 7551 of Shri Hitesh Bhatnagar and Smt . Shalini Bhatnagar . He affixed the Bank's crossing stamp partly onthe counter foil on the relevant voucher in lieu of having received the voucher alongwith the cheques . He did not sign the counterfoil for having received the instruments . He did not enter cheques the outward clearing register. He got both the cheques encashed from the State Bank of India and thus , caused loss to the bank of Rs . 6000. An enquirywas instituted . The enquiry officer submitted his report on 12-6-1993 . The workman applicant was held guilty.

It was further submitted that the enquiry was held on 14 different dates from 21-01-1992 to 04-03-1993 . The workmanapplicant remained absent on 9 different dates . Sometimes , he left the venue of enquiry. Sometimes he was present but his D.R, was not present . The Manager oftheBranch lodged a written complaint to the concerned police station on the basis of which an FIR No. 359/90 under Section 409 and 420 IPC was registered against him.

That on 31-7-1992 , the workman made some unauthorised remarks in the enquiry register (on page 5 and on 17-12-1992, he refused to put his signature. ) My attention was drawn to 1967 ( 3 ) DLT 567 , the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that when a party intends or attempts to stultify the enquiry and his attitude is one of the complete non- cooperation, it was not necessary for the Board of Enquiry to give any notice of further stages of the proceedings of the enquiry.

In AIR 1962 SC 1344, it has been held that the strict rules of the law of evidence are not applicable in an enquiry and when the workman applicant declines to take inthe proceedings and fails to remain present , the enquiry officer canproceed ex parte. Shri Ramesh Kumar has filed several writ petitions against suspension and for interim bail for fullwages and allowances but he got no relief.

205

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 1 , 2005/पौष 11 , 1926

My attention was drawn to (1997) 11 SCC 361. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case the workman applicant has been acquitted from the criminal charges , the domestic enquiry is not nullified . In the case of clear cut acquittal , the judgement of the court should be honoured but in case benefit of doubt has been given or the accused has been released on technical grounds , then the validity of the domestic enquiry cannot be interfered with. The same view has been expressed in 1999 1 LLJ 1313.

My attention was drawn to Civil Appeal No. 1377/ 2002 ofUCO Bank , Chandigarh. Hon'ble Supreme Court hasheld that everyone expects higher standards of honesty and integrity if a person is employed in banking activities and ifthere is embezzlement , that is serious charge and if it is proved , the workman/ applicant must be dismissed.

It was submitted from the side of the management that on 13-7-1992 , the CSE was present and the DR was absent so the case was adjourned on 26-08-1992 . On 26-08-1992, the DR was present and the CSE was absent . On 21-09-1992, the hearing was adjourned at the request of the CSE . On 27-10-1992 and 13-11-1992 , the proceedings was adjourned at the request of the CSE . On 19-11-1992 , the DR was present but the CSE was absent. On 17-12-1992 , the CSE was present but the DR was absent . On 02-02-1993 , the enquiry officer proceeded ex parte . This indicates that the workman/ applicant had sought 7 adjournments and it has been held by the E.O. that he wilfully and without any cogent reasons absented himself and attended the proceedings on three occasions only and on all the threę occasions , his attitude was non- cooperative. Though he was present yet he sought adjournments on one pretext or the other.

It was submitted from the side of the workman that enquiry has been concluded and he was not given opportunity to cross - examine the witnesses of the management. It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1999 I LJ 1313 that acquittal of the delinquent officer by criminal court will not preclude departmental proceedings . Different standards of proof are required for proving the charge . In criminal case , the charge is to be proved by the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt but indepartmental proceedings , the charge is proved by preponderance of the probabilities . However , there is settled law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that if there is clear cut acquittal on the set said of facts from the trial court, thejudgement of the trial court should be honoured in the departmental enquiry.

It was submitted from the side of the management that in the instant case, there is no clear cut acquittal . No judgement has been filed on the record to show that there was clear cut acquittal . It was submitted from the side of the management that he was acquitted on 6-6-1998 . I have perused the order of 6-6-1998. There is no judgement on 206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 1 , 2005 /PAUSA 11 , 1926

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 6-6-1998 . The record was not traced so the court did not pass any order and did not find the workman applicant involved in the case .

It was further submitted by the management that Shri Hitesh Bhatnagar , the account holder had filed a complaint that money deposited by him had not been credited in his account and thereupon , the charge sheet was served and enquiry was conducted.

C/491 , 1961 (LJ) 117 , 1983 LLJ page 122, 1967 (I) LLJ 270 , 1985 ( I ) LLJ 297, 1981 (I) LLJ 408 AIR 1970 page 299 and a few others law cited in the argument but no copy of the same has been provided. The law cited by the workman applicant are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . He did not participate in the enquiry wilfully and deliberately so he tried to escape the enquiry and when the ex parte enquiry was held, he levelled all the allegations . It is settled law that ex parte enquiry is not to be set aside. If the workman/ applicant runs away from the enquiry or if he deliberately and willfully avoids the proceedings of the enquiry and as mentioned above , the workman has avoided the enquiry. There is nojudgement of acquittal . The ex-parte enquiry has been held properly and the workman/applicant has been afforded proper opportunities to cross -examine the witnesses and to produce his own defence but he ran away from the enquiry so the enquiry will not vitiate on the ground . He was posted for receiving the cheques for collection from the outside banks and he received the cheque and got it encashed , so he caused a loss of Rs. 6000 to the bank . It is settled law that such employees are posted at the post of faith and trust and if the faith and trust of the customer is shaken , the bank would have very bad image. So the persons employed on such posts must be honest. In case their integrity is doubtful , they should not be continued any longer in the bank as has been laid down by the Hon'ble High Court . The enquiry is fair, the workman applicant does not deserve to get any relief as prayed for. The law cited by the workman/ applicant are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

The reference is replied thus :

The action of the management of PNB , New Delhi isdismissing Sh . Ramesh Kumar, Clerk from service w.e.f. 1-11-93 is justified . The workman/applicant does not deserve to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly.

Dated 03-12-2004

It was submitted from the side of the workman that Mrs. Pushpa Mathur committed the same misconduct but she was not punished . The Enquiry Officer was prejudiced and the management obtained a complaint from Shri Hitesh Bhatnagar in order to harass and punish him . So far as the case of Mrs. Pushpa Mathur is concerned , no paperregarding the same has been filed and the workinan applicant cannot take the ground of parity. If no action was taken against Mrs. Mathur , it does not debar the management to take action against him. It was submitted from the side of the management that on 31-5-1991 , his suspension order was revoked . Enquiry can be proceeded despite the suspension order being revoked . It was submitted that no handwriting expert has been examined to prove forgery. It has been held by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in case , there is clear cut acquittal , it should not be disturbed . In the present case , there is no copy of judgement of the criminal court. My attention was drawn to SCR 1964 page 556. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case criminal charge is pending , the enquiry for that reason alone is not vitiated . It has been held by the Hon'ble Patna High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1963 (2) LLJ 367 SC and 1985 LAB IC that in case, the enquiry was held in violation of the principles of natural justice it is vitiated and in case no chance was given to the CSE for cross - examination , the enquiry is vitiated . From the side of the workman , my attention was drawn to 1959 ( 2 ) LLJ 663 , 1973 ( 2 ) LLJ 462, 1971 (2 ) LLJ 446 , 1989 (2) LLJ 377 , 1977 (2 ) LLJ 163, 1962 (2 ) LLJ 360 , 1952 (2 ) LLJ 722 , 1960 ( 17) FLR 1959 , 1965 ( 11 ) LLJ 162, 1962 ( I ) LLJ page 7 , 1964 SC , page 364 , 1969 ( 2 ) LLJ 89 , Madras High Court , 1954 ( 1 )

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer Printedby the Manager, Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 , 2005