रजिस्ट्रीसं ० डी एल ( एन ) 04/ 0007/ 2003-05
REGD . No. DL (N) 04 /0007 / 2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 2 ]
No. 2 j
नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 2 जनवरी 8 , 2005 , शनिवार पौष 12- पौष 18, 1926
NEW DELHI , JANUARY 2-JANUARY 8 , 2005 , SATURDAY/ PAUSA 12- PAUSA 18 , 1926
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II- Section 3 Sub - section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 59.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 125 पीसीआर 2004, दिनांक 18-08-2004 और 02-09-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री मुश्ताक भाई, मालिक, मैसर्स एम.एम. कैमिकल इंडस्ट्रिज, 38/1 , द्वितीय मेन रोड, केन्नप्पा गार्डन, बंगलौर- 46 तथा किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45) की धारा 120 -बी सपठित धारा 420 तथा आवश्यक वस्तु अधिनियम की धारा 7 सपठित नाफ्था नियंत्रण आदेश की धारा 3 ( II ) ( III ) के अधीन किए गए अपराधों के संबंध में एफआईआर सं. बीएस. 3 / 2004 / एस/ 2003 / एस सीबी/मुंबई और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य 3830 GI / 2004
(207)
अपराधों के आंशिक अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं. 228/ 109/2003- एवीडी- II ] शुभाः ठाकुर, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 S. O. 59. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 125 PCR 2004 dated 18-08-2004 and 02-09-2004, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for the part investigation in FIR No.
208
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
BS.3/2004/ S/2003/ SCB /Mumbai under Section 120-B read with420 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act read with Section 3 ( II) (III) Naphtha Control Order, against Shri Mushtaqbhai , Owner, M/ s . M.M. Chemical Industries , 38/ 1 , 2nd Main Road , Cennappa Garden, Bangalore -46, for the commission of the said offences , and against any other public servants or persons , in relation to , or in connection vith the said offence , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction, or arising out ofthe same facts .
Shri Mallari Rao, Proprietrix, M/ s . Uma Builders, Bangalore (3) Shri Mallari Rao , M/ s. Uma Builders , Bangalore, and unknown others under Sections 120 -B , 420 , 468 , 471 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and section 13(2) read with 13 (1) ( d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) for their fraudulent acts in the matter ofgranting housing loans of Rs . 1.10 crores to M/s. UmaBuilders and attempts , abetments and conspiracies inrelation to, or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts ..
[No. 228/100/2004-AVD -II] [No. 228/109/2003 -AVD - II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy .
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 61.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 209 पीसीआर 2004 , दिनांक 09-11-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री सरूप सिंह, तत्कालीन अनुभाग पर्यवेक्षक, महाप्रबंधक ( नॉर्थ ) का कार्यालय, एमटीएनएल, नई दिल्ली एवं किन्हीं अन्यलोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2) सपठित धारा 13(1 ) ( ई) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं. 228/99/2004- एवीडी- II ] शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004 का.आ. 60.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम 46 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धा की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 223 पीसीआर 2004 , दिनांक 23-11-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री विलफ्रेड सिक्वेयारा , तत्कालीन शाखा प्रबंधक, भारतीय स्टेट बैंक, पर्सनल बैंकिंग शाखा , इन्दिरा नगर, बंगलौर (2) श्रीमती उमा राव, पत्नी श्री मल्लारी राव, मालकिन, मैसर्स उमा बिल्डर्स, बंगलौर ) श्री मल्लारी राव, मैसर्स उमा बिल्डर्स, बंगलौर और अन्य अज्ञात व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध मैसर्स उमा बिल्डर्स को 1.10 करोड़ रुपए का आवास ऋण प्रदान करने के मामले में उनके कपटपूर्ण कृत्यों के लिए भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45) की धारा 120- बी, 420 , 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 (2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी ) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों , दुष्प्रेरणों और षड्यंत्रों तथ उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भुत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करत
[सं. 228/100/2004- एवीडी- II ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव
1 New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004
S. O. 61. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946, (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 209 PCR 2004 dated 9-11-2004, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offence punishable under Section 13 (2) read with 13 ( 1 ) (e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988 ) against Shri Saroop Singh , the then Section Supervisor , Office of the G.M. (North) , MTNL , New Delhi , for his fraudulent acts , and any other public servants or persons in relation to , or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
S. O. 66. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946, (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 223 PCR 2004 dated 23-11-2004, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation against ( 1 ) Shri Wilfred Sequeria, the then Branch Manager , State Bank of India , Personal Banking Branch. Indira Nagar, Bangalore ( 2 ) Smt . Uma Rao , wife of
[No. 228/ 99/2004 - AVD- II] SHUBHA THAKUR , Under Secy .
209-
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
(क) भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45) की धारा 283 के अधीन दंडनीय अपराध, और
(ख) उपर्युक्त अपराधों में से एक अथवा अधिक से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों को ।
[सं. 228/65/2004- ए० वी०डी०- II ] शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004
S. O. 63. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government hereby specifies the following offences in the following Act as offences which are to be investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment namely:-
(a) Offence punishable under Section 283 of the IndianPenal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) , and
का.आ. 62.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 210 पीसीआर 2004, दिनांक 09-11-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से जाली प्रमाण पत्रों के आधार पर मैसर्स हिन्दुस्तान एरोनॉटिक्स लिमिटेड में रोजगार प्राप्त करने के लिए श्री के . चंद्रकांत, प्रबंधक ( पी एंड ए ) , हिन्दुस्तान एरोनॉटिक्स लिमिटेड, बंगलौर एवं किन्हींअन्यलोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 420 , 468 , 471 और 198 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्योंकी शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/95/2004-एवीडी- II ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव
(b) Attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004
[No. 228/65/2004 -AVD -II]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 64.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 केसाथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं . एचडी-2 पीसीआर 2004दिनांक 26-06-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति सेनिम्नलिखित अधिनियमों:-
1. कर्नाटक संगठित अपराध नियंत्रण , 2000 ,
2. कर्नाटक स्टांप अधिनियम, 1957 S. O. 62. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 210 PCR 2004 dated 09-11-2004, hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 198 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of1860) and Section 13 (2) read with 13 (1 ) (d) of Prevention ofCorruptionAct , 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988) against Shri K. Chandrakantha , Manager (P & A) , Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Bangalore , for securing employment with M/ s . Hindustan Aeronautics Limited on the basis of forged certificates and any other public servants or persons in relation to, or in connection with the said offences, and any other offences committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/95/2004-AVD-II]
केअधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है । SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
[सं. 228/35/2004- ए० वी०डी०- II ] शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 का.आ. 63.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अपराधों को दिल्लीविशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा अन्वेषित किए जाने वाले अपराधोंके रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करती है, नामत :-
S. O. 64. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State 210
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
Goverrunens ofKarnataka , vide Notification No. HD 2 PCR 2004 dated 26-06-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for invesu gation of offences punishable under the following enactments:-
1. The Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000,
2. The Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 , and Attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to, or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences comunitted in the course of the same transactions or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/35/2004 -AVD - II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secу .
शुद्धिपत्र नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 65.-भारत के राजपत्र में भाग II खंड 3 ( ii ) में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार, कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) की अधिसूचना सं. 225/24/2004- एवीडी- II दिनांक 10 नवंबर, 2004 में " सर्वश्री बी. आर. नंजुनदैया और विजय कुमार एम. शीलवंत , अधिवक्ताओं " को " सर्वश्री बी.आर. नंजुनदैया, वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता और विजय कुमार एम. शीलवंत, अधिवक्ता" तथा " अपील/पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में उनसे आनुषंगिक " को" अपील न्यायालय, पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में उनसे आनुषंगिक" पढा जाए ।
[सं . 225/24/2004- एवीडी- II ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव
CORRIGENDUM
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004 S. O. 65. In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Personnel , Public Grievances (Department of Personnel and Training) No. 225 /24/2004- AVD - II dated the 10th November, 2004 published in the Gazette of India in Part - II Section 3 ( ii ) for " S/Shri B. R. Nanjundaiah and Vijay Kumar M. Sheelvant, Advocates" read " S/Shri B.R. Nanjundaiah , Senior Advocate and Vijay Kumar M. Sheelvant , Advocate" and for " incidents thereto in the appellate/revision " read " incidental thereto in the Appelai Court , Court of Revision. "
[No. 225/24/2004 -AVD - II]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secу.
वित्त मंत्रालय
(राजस्वविभाग)
(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
आयकर
का.आ. 66.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड (23 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] सरकार एतद्वारा " नेशनल राईफल एसोसिएशन ऑफ इंडिया , नई दिल्ली " को वर्ष 2000-2001 से 2002-2003 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्: -
(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्य के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है ;
( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिकअंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा ;
( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्योंकी प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा - पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा ;
(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धमार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी।
[अधिसूचना सं. 297/ 2004/फा. सं. 196/9/2004- आयकर नि.- I ]
दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004 (INCOME TAX)
S. O. 66. In exercise of powers conferred by the clause (23 ) of section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the "National Rifle Association of India, New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the Assessment years 2000-2001 to 2002-2003 subject to the following conditions, namely :-
(i) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;
(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
211
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18, 1926
above other wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section ( 5) of Section 11 ;
(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business unless the business is incidential to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;
(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance withthe provisions of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ;
(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisationwith similar objectives.
[NotificationNo. 297/2004 /F. No. 196/9/2004 -ITA - I]
DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy .
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2004 स्टाम्प
का.आ. 67.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम , 1899 ( 1899 का 2) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( i ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा मैसर्स मवाना शुगर्स, लि. , नई दिल्ली को मात्र चौहत्तर हजार सात सौ चौरासी रुपये का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है , जो उक्त कंपनी द्वारा जारी किये जाने वाले मात्र निन्नावे लाख इकहत्तर हजार दो सौ रुपये के समग्र मूल्य के 1 से 99712 तक विशिष्ट संख्या वाले शून्य कूपन डिबेंचर 99712 पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।
[सं. 25/2004/स्टाम्प/फा. सं . 33/47/ 2004-बि.क. ] आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव
ORDER
New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2004 STAMPS
S. O. 67. In exercise of powers conferred by clause (b) of Sub -section ( 1) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899 ), the Central Government hereby permits M/s.Mawana Sugars Limited, new Delhi to pay consolidated stamp duty of ruppes seventy four thousand seven hundred eighty four only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on 99712 Zero Coupon Debentures bearing distinctive numbers 1 to 99712 aggregating to rupees ninety nine lakh seventy one thousand two hundred only, to be issued by the said Company.
[No. 25 /2004/STAMP/F . No. 33 /47/2004- ST] R. G. CHHABRA, Under Secy .
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2004 स्टाम्प
का.आ. 68.- भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम, 1899 ( 1899 का 2) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( i ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा तमिलनाडु विद्युत बोर्ड, चेन्नई को मात्र दो करोड़ दो लाख चौतीस हजार रुपये का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदा करने की अनुमति प्रदान करती है , जो उक्त बोर्ड द्वारा जारी किये जाने वाले मात्र चार सौ चार करोड़ अड़सठ लाख रुपये के समग्र मूल्य के प्रामीसरी नोटों के स्वरूप के प्रत्येक एक लाख रुपये के 8 प्रतिशत तमिलनाडु विद्युत बोर्ड पॉवर बंधपत्रों ( श्रृंखला-5/2003- 04) पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।
[सं. 24/2004- स्टाम्प/फा. सं . 33/8/2004-बि.क. ] आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव
ORDER
New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2004 STAMPS
S. O. 68. In exercise of powers conferred by clause (b) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act , 1899 (2 of 1899) , the Central Government hereby permits Tamil Nadu Electricity Board , Chennai to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees two crore two lakh thirty four thousand only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on 8% Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Power Bonds ( Series - 5/2003-04) of rupees one lakh each in the nature of promissory notes aggregating to rupees four hundred four crore sixty eight lakh only , to be issued by the said Board.
[No. 24/2004 - STAMP/F. No. 33 / 8/2004 - ST] R. G. CHHABRA, Under Secy .
(आर्थिक कार्य विभाग )
(बैंकिंग प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 69.- भारतीय स्टाम्प लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक अधिनियम, 1989 ( 1989 का 39 ) की धारा ( 6 ) की उपधारा ( 2 ) के साथ पठित धारा ( 6 ) की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा , भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक के उप प्रबंध निदेशक श्री एन. बालासुब्रमणियन को उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30-9-2006 तक अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की आयु पूरी होने तक अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. -3 (4 )/2004- आई एफ-1 ] अतुल कुमार राय , निदेशक (Department ofEconomicAffairs) (BANKING DIVISION)
New Delhi , the 30th December, 2004 S. O. 69. In exercise of powers conferredby clause (a) of Sub -section ( 1) of Section ( 6) read with sub - section (2) ofSection (6) of the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act , 1989 (39 of 1989 ), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri N. Balasubramanian , Deputy ManagingDirector, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) as Chairman and Managing Director , SIDBI, with effect from the date of his assuming charge and upto 30-9-2006 i.e. , the date of his attaining the age of superannuation, or until further orders, whichever is earlier .
[F. No. 3(4)/2004- IF- I ] ATUL KUMAR RAI , Director 212
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 70.- भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक अधिनियम, 1989 ( 1989 का 39 ) , वर्ष 2000 में यथा संशोधित, की धारा 61 ( 1 ) ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा , लघु उद्योग मंत्रालय के श्री सत्यानंद मिश्र , अपर सचिव एवं विकास आयुक्त ( लघु उद्योग ) को श्री सुरेश चन्द्रा के स्थान पर तत्काल प्रभाव से अगला आदेश होने तक भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक के बोर्ड में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।
[फा० सं० 24 ( 5 )/2002- आई एफ-1 ] अतुल कुमार राय , निदेशक New Delhi , the 30th December, 2004 S. O. 70. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section ( 1) ( c) of Samll Industries Development Bank of India Act , 1989 ( 39 of 1989 ) as amended in the year 2000 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Satyananda Mishra , Additional Secretary and Development Commissioner ( SSI) , Ministry of Small Scale Industries as a Director on the Board of Small Industries Development Bank of India with immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri Suresh Chandra .
[F. No. 24(5)/2002- IF - I] ATUL KUMAR RAI , Director नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 71.- प्रादेशिक ग्रामीण बैंक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 21 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , बैंकिंग प्रभाग की दिनांक 28 मार्च, 1976 को भारत के असाधारण राजपत्र, भाग II खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) में दिनांक 26 मार्च, 1976 के का.आ. सं. 247 ( अ . ) के तहत प्रकाशित अधिसूचना में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है :
उपर्युक्त अधिसूचना में " जिला गुड़गांव " शब्दों के स्थान पर " गुड़गांव, महेन्द्रगढ, फरीदाबाद, रिवारी , और सोनीपत जिले " शब्द प्रतिस्थापित किए जाएंगे ।
[फा० सं.० 1 /1/2004-आरआरबी ]
जी. बी. सिंह, अवर सचिव पाद टिप्पणी: मूल अधिसूचना दिनांक 26-3-1976 के का.आ. 247 (आ. ) के तहत भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित की गई थी और तत्पश्चात् 14 जुलाई , 1979 को प्रकाशित का.आ. 2389 के तहत संशोधित की गई ।
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] New Delhi, the 30th December , 2004 S. O. 71. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 (21 of 1976 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification ofthe Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Banking vide S.O. numbver 247 (E) dated the 26th March, 1976 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary , Part II Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated the 28th March, 1976 , namely :---
In the said notification for the words " district of Gurgaon" the words "districts of Gurgaon, Mahandragarh, Faridabad, Rewari and Sonepat " shall be substituted.
[F. No. 1/1/2004-RRB ]
G. B. SINGH, Under Secy.
Foot Note: The principal Notification was published in the Gazette of India vide S.O. 247 (E) dated 26-3-1976 and subsequently amended vide S.O. 2369 published on 14th July, 1979.
स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय
(स्वास्थ्यविभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 72.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102) के प्रयोजन हेतु रोचेस्टर विश्वविद्यालय, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
और, डॉ. मैथ्यू जान मुल्डर, अमेरिकी नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्तअर्हता है , कोलम्बिया एशिया हास्पिटल प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, बैंगलोर से शिक्षा हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं ;
{ अतः , अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतदद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है किभारत में डॉ. मैथ्यूजान मुल्डर द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधि:-
(क) 1 जुलाई, 2004 से आगे छह माह की अवधि; अथवा (ख) उस अवधि, जिसके दौरान डॉ. मैथ्यू मुल्डर, कोलम्बिाया एशिया हास्पिटल प्राइवेट लिमिटेड बैंगलौर से जुड़े हैं , इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी । [संख्या वी-11016/1/2004 - एम ई (नीति -1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव 213
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18, 1926
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILYWELFARE (Department ofHealth)
New Delhi , the 23rd December, 2004 5. O. 72.-Whereas medical qualification Doctor of Medicinegranted by University of Rochester , USA , is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) under Section 14 of the said Act;
Andwhereas Dr. Mathew John Mulder , American national , who possess the said qualification is attached to Columbia Asia Hospital Pvt . Ltd. , Bangalore for the purpose of education and not for personal gain;
(P.M.S. SECTION)
New Delhi, the 30th December, 2004 S. O. 73.-In exercise of the power conferred by sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation withDental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments inPart -I ofthe Schedule to the said Act, namely :-
Inpart- I of the Schedule, after serial No. 61 , and the entries relating thereto , the following serial number and entries shall be added, namely:
1.Manubhai Patel BDS
(Bhav Nagar)
62. BhavNagar
University,
Bhavnagar
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- seciton ( 1 ) of Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Mathew John Mulder in India shall be limited to :-
(a) a period of six months from 1 July 2004 onwards; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Mathew John Mulder is attached to Columbia Asia Hospital Pvt. Ltd. , Bangalore whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016/1/2004- ME(Policy -I) ] P.G. KALADHARAN, Under Secy.
(पी.एम.एस. अनुभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 73.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है; नामतः
अनुसूचीके भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 61 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों केसामने निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी, नामतः
62. भावनगर विश्वविद्यालय , मनुभाई पटेल डेंटल बी डी एस भावनगर
कालेज और हास्पिटल, (भावनगर )
वड़ोदरा ( गुजरात )
(i ) दन्त सर्जरी में
स्नातक (जब यह
3-7-2004को
अथवा उसके बाद
प्रदान की गई हो) ।
[फा. सं. वी-12017/14/98 -पी.एम.एस. ]
ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव Dentral College & Hospital, Vadodara ,
Gujarat
(i) Bachelor of Dental
Surgery (when granted on or after 3-7-2004)
[F. No. V. - 12017/ 14/98-PMS ]
A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 74.-दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 मे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: -
2. गोवा विश्वविद्यालय, गोवा के संबंध में दंत्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 32 के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों को गवर्नमेंट डेंटल कालेज एवं हास्पिटल , बामबोलिम के संबंध में बी. डी. एस. डिग्री के लिए क्रम संख्या ( i ) के रूप में अंकित किया जाएगा और उसके अधीन निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी:-
(II) मास्टर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी
ओरल मेडिसिन
एम. डी. एस. ( ओरल मेडिसिन)
(यदि6-5-2004 को अथवा इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) [सं. वी-12017/44/99 -पी.एम.एस. ( पार्ट ) ]
ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 30th December , 2004 S. O. 74. In exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following 214
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
2. The existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 32. in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) pertaining to , Goa University , Goa will be numbered as ( i ) for BDS degree in respect of Govt . Dental College & Hospital , Bambolim and the following entries shall be inserted thereunder:-
(ii) Master of Dental Surgery
-OralMedicine
MDS (OralMedicine) (ifgranted on or after 6-5-2004)
[F. No. V. - 12017/44/99-PMS (Pt . ) ]
A. K. SINGH, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 75.- दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 मे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-
2. कुरूक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय, के संबंध में दंत्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 39 के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में, प्रविष्टि संख्या- II के पश्चात डी. ए. वी. सेंटेनरी , डेंटल कालेज, यमुनानगर के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी:-
ऑर्थोडोंटिक्स
एम.डी.एस. ( ऑर्थो. )
कुरूक्षेत्र
(यदि 31-7-2003 को अथवा इसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )
[सं. वी-12018/35/2001-पी.एम.एस. ]
ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th December , 2004 S. O. 75. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :-
2. In the existing entries of columns 2 & 3 against Serial No. 39. in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to , Kurukshetra University , the following entries in respect of D.A.V. Centenary Dental college , Yamuna Nagar shall be inserted after entryNo. II: --
-Orthodontics
MDS(Ortho) Kurukshetra (ifgranted on or after 31-7-2003 )
[F. No. V. - 12018/35/ 2001 -PMS ] A. K. SINGH , Under Secy.
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 76.- दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात , एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 मे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -
2. महाराष्ट्र यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हैल्थ साईंसिज, नासिक के संबंध में दंत्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 60 के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत डा० डी.वाई. पाटिल डेन्टल कालेज एवं हास्पिटल, पिम्परी , पुणे के संबंध में इसके अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी:-
XIII . डा० डी.वाई. पाटिल डेन्टल कालेज एवं हास्पिटल, पिम्परी, पुणे
( i ) बैचलर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी बी.डी.एस. ( महाराष्ट्र साईंसिज, नासिक यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हैल्थ (यदि 30-6-2004 को अथवा इसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो)
[सं. वी-12017/41/97-पी.एम.एस. ]
ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th December, 2004 S. O. 76. In exercise of the power conferred by sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-
2. Under the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 60. in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik the following entries in respect ofDr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital , Pimpri , Pune shall be inserted thereunder:-
(XIII) Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital , Pimpri , Pune (i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery BDS ( Maharashtra
University of Health Seiences , Nashik) (Whengranted on or after 30-6-2004 )
[F. No. V. - 12017/ 41 / 97 -PMS]
A. K. SINGH , Under Secy.
215 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
नागर विमानन मंत्रालय
लगभग शत- प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है ।
नई दिल्ली , 23 दिसम्बर, 2004
[सं. ई -11011/1/2001-हिन्दी]
स्वतंत्र के. सेखों, कार्यकारी निदेशक एवं संयुक्त सचिव
MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS
(Department of Fertilizers)
New Delhi, the 28th December, 2004 का.आ. 77.-भारतीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण अधिनियम , 1994( 1994 का 55 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, एतद्द्वारा तत्काल प्रभाव से श्री वी. सुब्रह्मण्यन, आई. ए. एस. के स्थान पर श्री प्रशांत के मिश्र , आई. ए. एस. जो कि नागर विमानन मंत्रालय में अपर सचिव एवं वित्तीय सलाहकार हैं , को भारतीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण के बोर्ड में अंशकालिक सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
श्री टी. के. मित्रा, पूर्व नागर विमानन सुरक्षा आयुक्त 30 नवम्बर, 2004 को अपनी सेवानिवृत्ति के परिणामस्वरूप, भारतीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण के बोर्ड में अंशकालिक सदस्य के रूप में कार्यभार से मुक्त होगएहैं ।
[सं. एवी-24015/005/94-वीबी ]
S. O. 78. In pursuance of sub -rule ( 4) of Rule 10 oftheOfficial Language Use for official purposes of the Union Rule 1976 the Central Govt . hereby notifies the FCI Aravali Gypsum and Minerals India Ltd. Jodhpur , Rajasthan under the Administrative Control of the Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers Department of Fertilizers whereofmore than 80 % i.e. about 100 % staff have acquired theworking knowledge of Hindi .
के. रामकृष्णन, अवर सचिव
[No.E- 11011/ 1/2001 -Hindi ]
SWATANTRAK . SEKHON, Executive Director & Jt. Secy.
MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION NewDelhi, the 23rd December , 2004
वस्त्र मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
S. O. 77. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Airports Authority Act, 1994 (No.55 of 1994), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Prashanta K. Mishra IAS and Additional Secretary and Financial Adviser in the Ministry of Civil Aviation as Part- timeMember on the Board ofAirports Authority of India vice Shri V. Subramanian , IAS , with immediate effect .
का.आ. 79.- केन्द्र सरकार, एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है किकेंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड अधिनियम, 1948 की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में राज्य सभा ने इस अधिनियम के उपबंधों के अध्यधीन श्रीमती प्रेमा करिअप्पा, सदस्य, राज्य सभा को तीन वर्ष की अवधिके लिए केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए 14 दिसंबर, 2004 को विधिवत रूप से चुन लिया है ।
[फा. सं. 25012/4/91 -रेशम ] Subsequent to his retirement on 30th November, 2004, Shri T.K. Mitra, former Commissioner of Civil Aviation Security ceases to be the Part - time Member on the Board ofAirports Authority of India.
किरन धींगरा, संयुक्त सचिव [No. AV-24015/005/94-VB]
MINISTRY OF TEXTILES
K. RAMAKRISHANAN, Under Secy
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004 रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय
(उर्वरक विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 28 दिसम्बर, 2004
S. O. 79. The Central Government hereby notifies that the rajya Sabha has in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section (3 ) of section 4 of the Central Silk Board Act, 1948, duly elected Shrimati Prema Cariappa , Member , Rajya Sabha, on 14th December , 2004 to serve as a member of the Central Silk Board for a period of three years subject to the provisions of the Act .
[F. No. 25012/4/91 -Silk]
KIRAN DHINGRA, Jt. Secy.
का.आ. 78.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ' संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग' नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) केअनुसरण में रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय , उर्वरक विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन एफ सी आई अरावली जिप्सम एण्ड मिनरल्स इण्डिया लिमिटेड, जोधपुर ( राजस्थान ) जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अर्थात्
3830 Gl/2004-2 J 216
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 80.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा वाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अन्न, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डोडिया स्केल कम्पनी, शिवाजी नगर, सावरकुंडला -364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्य यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रो वेट प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' टाइगर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2004/129 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल यांत्रिक विषम भुज तुला प्रकार का कप्पाउंड़ लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रो वेट प्रकार का है ) । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सील की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे हो मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा० या उससे अधिक के " ई " पान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि. ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं ० डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 254 ) / 2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 217 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 80. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine -Pro Weight type ) with analogue indication of Medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name " TIGER " (herein referred to as said model) , manufactured by M/s . Dodia Scale Co. , Shivaji Nagar , Savarkundla- 364 515 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 2004 / 129 ;
The said Model is a mechanical steelyard type , compound liver based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine -Pro Weight type) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 1 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 50g .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate, scaling is also done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar wake , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 1000 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 x 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F No WM - 21 ( 254 )/2003 ]
PA KRISHNAMOORTHY . Director of Legal Metrology 218
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 81.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शेखर ब्रदर, 151 , जोर बाग, नई दिल्ली -110003 द्वारा विनिर्मित अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी मीटर " मुंकी मीटर " श्रृंखला के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मुंकी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसको उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/ 179 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पन्न जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
K= 640
DIGITAL FARE METER
DISTANCE ( Km. )
FARE( Rs.)
MIN
HIRE
HOUR
STOP
EXTRA
ON/OFF
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए पल्स जेनरेटर, केबिल क्नेकटिंग पाइन्ट अथवा मुख्य किराया मीटर का टेमपर करने से रोकने के लिए भी सील की जा सकती है ।
उक्त माडल अंकक सहित टैक्सी मीटर दूरी मापने वाला उपकरण है । यह निरन्तर योग करता रहता है और यात्रा के किसी भी समय पर किराया दर्शाता है और यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार दर्शाता है । " संदेय के लिए किराया " किसी कतिपय गति से अधिक और उस गति से कम लिया गया समय में यात्रा की दूरी का प्रकार्य है । मीटर का पठन खण्ड प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) द्वारा उपदर्शित किया जाता है । मीटर " के " कारक 1680 पल्स/कि.मी . है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 112 )/2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
219 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18, 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 81. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a Taxi Meter with digital indication of series ' MUNKY METER ' with brand name " MUNKY" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Shekhar Brother , 151 , Jor Bagh, New Delhi - 110 003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/179 .
K- 640 Munky
DIGITAL FARE METER
DISTANCE( Km. )
FARE( Rs. )
MIN
HOUR
EXTRA
STOP
HIRE
ON/OFF
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done on the pulse generator, cable connecting points and the main fare meter to prevent their tampering for fraudulent practices .
The said model is a ' Taxi Meter ' with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring device. It totalizes continuously and indicates at any moment of the journey, the charges payable by the passenger . The " fare to pay " is a function of the distance travelled above a certain speed and the time occupied below that speed. The reading of the meter is indicated by seven segment Light Emitting Diode ( LED) . The ' K' factor of the meter is 1680 pulses/kilometer.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 112)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 220
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 82.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वेद स्वरूप बेरी एण्ड सन्स, बी -36/ 10, जी टी करनाल रोड, इंडिस्ट्रियल एरिया दिल्ली -110033 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " 224 " श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन - प्रो वेट प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " बेरी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 / 114 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विषमभुज तुला प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन प्रो वेट प्रकार का है ) । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 131 )/2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 221 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 82. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine - Pro weight type ) with analogue indication of " 224 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - UI ) and with brand name " BERRY " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Ved Swarup Berry & Sons, B - 36 / 10 , G.T. , Karnal Road, Industrial Area , Delhi - 110033 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/ 114.
The said Model is a steelyard type , liver based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform machine-Pro weight type) with a maximum capacity of 500kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy, and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 1,000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' valuc of 5g or more and ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k, is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM-21 ( 131 ) /2003 ]
PA. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 222
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 83.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवां प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वेद स्वरूप बेरी एण्ड सन्स, बी -36 / 10 , जी. टी . करनाल रोड, इंडिस्ट्रियल एरिया दिल्ली -110033 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " 236 " श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन-विषमभुज तुला प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " बेरी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2004/115 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल विपम भुज तुला प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन विषमभुज तुला प्रकार का है ) । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1,000 कि. प्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5,000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।
[फा.स. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 131 )/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 223 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 83. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine- Steelyard type) with analogue indication of " 236 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name " BERRY " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Ved Swarup Berry & Sons , B -36/10 , G.T. , Karnal Road, Industrial Area , Delhi - 110033 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/ 115 ;
The said Model is a steelyard type , liver based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine- Steelyard type) with a maximum capacity of 1,000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is200g.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5,000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10 %, 2 × 10% or 5 × 10k , where k, is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 131 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 3830 Gl/2004-3 224
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) )
नईदिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 84.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स राधेश्याम ऋषिपाल फैक्ट्री, 308/14 , शहजादा बाग , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, दयाबस्ती, दिल्ली -110035 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " आर टी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " राजा " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 145 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
RAJA
उक्तमॉडल ( आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार) तौलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमत्ता 22 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 प्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसो श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 139 )/2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति. निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 225 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 84. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ; -
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrurgent (Table top type ) with digital indication of " RTT" series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II) and with brand name " RAJA " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Radhey Shyam Rishi Pal (Factory), 308/14, Shahzada Bagh . Industrial Area , Daya Basti, Delhi - 110 035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2004/ 145 ;
BAJA
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 22kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weigh- ing result. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verfication scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with vertification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for e value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k 2x-10 or 5 × 10k, where k. is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 139)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 226
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का० आ ० 85.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स बेवरेज मनेजमेंट सिस्टम , 19799 एस डब्ल्यू, 95 वां प्लेस सूट ए, टूआल्टिन, उड़ीसा 97062 और भारत में मैसर्स वी- मेदीराता इन्क, सी-194, (एल जी एफ) , डिफेन्स कॉलोनी, नई दिल्ली-110024 द्वारा विपणित स्वचालित मद्यमापक के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इजीपोर " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/275 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( ऊपर दी गई आकति देखें ) एक स्वचालित मद्यमापक है । इसकी भरण क्षमता एक बार में 30 मिली लीटर है । इसका उपयोग मद्य, बीयर, वाइन , सोडा इत्यादि जैसे द्रव उत्पादों को भरने के लिए किया जाता है । यह वहां एक डिसपेंसिंग युक्ति है जहां कोई केंद्रीय यूनिट है जिससे रज्जूद्वारा एक रिंग रोडर लगाया जाता है । बोतलें चुम्बकीय पारस से फिट की जाती है और सीलबंद की जाती हैं । मद्य बोतल से केवल तभी निकलेगी जब वॉ सहित बोतल रिंग रीडर द्वारा ली जाती है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 176 )/2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 227
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
NewDelhi, the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 85. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Liquor Measure with brand name " EASYPOUR" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) manufactured by M/s . Beverage Management Systems , 19799 SW95th Place, Suite A, Tualtin , Orissa 97062 and marketed in India by M/ s V - Medirata Inc. , C- 194, (LGF) Defence Colony, New Delhi - 110024 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/275;
The saidModel (see the figure given above) is an automatic liquor measure with a filling capacity of 30ml at atime. It is used for filling the liquid products like liquor, beer , wine, soda etc. It is a dispensing device where there is a central unit to which a ring reader is attached through a cord . The bottles are fitted with magnetic poures and sealed . The liquor will dispensed from the bottle only when the bottle with pourer is taken through the ring reader .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 176)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 228
THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का० आ ० 86.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट . और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स काठियावाड़ स्केल इण्डस्ट्रीज , अमरेली रोड, आक्टोरिया नाका, विश्वकर्मा इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया, सावरकुन्डला -364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित गणक मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " तितली " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिल आई एन डी/09/2004/ 128 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक गणक मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन की गणक मशीन भी होगी जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की क्षमता की रेंज में है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 294 ) /2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 229 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 86. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ,
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a counter machine with brand name " TITLI " (herein referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/ s . Kathiyawad Scale Industries. Amreli Road, Octroi Naka , Vishwakarına Industrial Area, Savarkundla - 364 515 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2004 / 128 ;
The said model ( see the figure given) is a counter machine . Its maximum capacity is Skg .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the counter machine of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50 kg . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 294)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 230
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का० आ ० 87.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बंसल स्केल्स इण्डिया, गीता भवन रोड, टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज के सामने, सोनीपत, हरियाणा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " बी एस पी " श्रृंखला के स्टील यार्ड प्रोवेट सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( यांत्रिक प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " बंसल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 175 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक यांत्रिक प्रकार का लीवर आधारित यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग मध्यम II ) अस्वचालित ( यात्रिक प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्दी की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेकं, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई" माम के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10% , या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 286)/2003 ]
पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 231 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi, the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 87. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical platform type) with steel yard and pro - weight (herein referred to as the said model) belonging to medium accuracy class ( accuracy class - III ) of series ' BSP' and with brand name " BANSAL " , manufactured by M/ s. Bansal Scales India, Geeta Bhawan Road, Opposite Telephone Exchange, Sonepat, Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 2004/ 175;
The said model is a mechanical type lever based non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Platform type) with steel yard and pro -weight maximum capacity of 300 kg, minimum capacity 2kg and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class- III) . The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 100g .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in excrcise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 % , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 286)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3830 GI/2004-4 232
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 सितम्बर , 2004
का० आ० 88. वः काय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ऐरो वेईंग सिस्टम , ए -7 . नारायणा इण्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया , फेस -1 , नई दिल्ली-110028 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित स्वतः सूचन, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ऐरो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 229 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे कई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. हैऔर न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को पुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण ब्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी जाएगा । और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. पा. से अधिक और 300 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 , या 5 × 10 हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।
[फा. सें. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 190 ) /2001 ]
पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 233
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 88. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights.and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating non- automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AWP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ARROW " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Arrow Weighing Systems , A - 7 , Naraina Industrial Area, Phase - I , New Delhi - 110028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/229 ,
The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100 kg and minimum capacity of 400g . The verification scale interval (e) is 20g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of sante series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 300 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 1000 for ' e value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, k being positive or negative whole mumber or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 190)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 234
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का० आ० 89.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ऐरो वेईंग सिस्टम, ए-7 , नारायणा इण्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया, फेस -1 , नई दिल्ली-110028 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ऐरो " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 228 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेलबटॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 , या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्भक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 190 ) /2001 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 235 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 89. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submittedto it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Acı , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AWT " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "ARROW" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Arrow Weighing Systems . A - 7 , Naraina Industrial Area. Phase - I , New Delhi - 110028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 2004 / 228 :
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50Hertz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 30000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 100 % , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 190 )/2001 ]
PA. KRISHNAMOORTHY; Director of Legal Metrology 236
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का० आ० 90.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ऐरो वेईंग सिस्टम, ए -7 , नारायणा इण्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया, फेस -1 , नई दिल्ली -110028 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूजे" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ऐरो " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 / 227 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेलबटॉप प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
Model AW - 1000
MAX: 1000 MIN: 200mge:10mg
UNIT
CAL
COUNT
MODE
TARE
Arrow Weighing System port. Ltd.
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मानमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10% , या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 190 ) /2001 ]
पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 237 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18, 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi, the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 90. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self- indicating , non- automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AWJ " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class- II) and with brand name " ARROW" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Arrow Weighing Systems , A - 7 , Nariana Industrial Area, Phase - I , New Delhi - 110028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/227;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 200 g and minimum capacity of 200mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .
Moedel A - 1000
MAX: 1000g MIN: 200mg e:10mg
UNIT
MODE
TARE
COUNT CAL
Arrow Weighing Systempot. Lil
Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with, ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k or 5×10k, k being positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM -21 ( 190)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 238
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 91.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जैमटेक वेइंग इन्स्ट्रूमेंटस , 4 - ए/ 17 , गौतम गली , नई विश्वास नगर, शाहदरा -110032 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एफ डब्ल्यू टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जैमटैक", है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2004/37 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता । कि० ग्रा० और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से ज़िससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि ० ग्रा ० से 50 मि० ग्रा ० तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में , सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि ०ग्रा० तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 160 )/2001 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 239 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi, the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 91. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " FWT " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II) and with brand name " GEMTECH " ( herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Gemtech Weighing Instruments , 4-A/17 , Gautam Gali , New Viswash Nagar, Sahadara, Delhi - 110032 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2004/37;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 1 Kg . and minimum capacity of 5g. The verification scale interval (e) is 100 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval (n) in a range of 5000 to 50,000 for e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10 %, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 160)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 3830 Gl/2004-5 240
[PART IH-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 92.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्टमें वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जैमटेक वेइंग इन्स्ट्रूमेंटस , 4 - ए/ 17 , गौतम गली, नई विश्वास नगर, शाहदरा -110032 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्य यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एफ एस पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जैमटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004/ 38 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत मापी प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द की जाएगी । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करतो है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से और 00 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 110 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 160 ) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 242
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 93.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रिमियम इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, 16 ए, हल्दवाड़ा लेन , हावड़ा-7711104 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पीईएस/ 85 - एफ" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " प्रिमियर ", है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 / 507 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
MODEL
PES - 85 / F
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि० ग्रा ० और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल सहित 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 65) /2000 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
241
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005 /पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 92. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Platform type ) weigh- ing instrument with digital indication of " FSP " sertes of high accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name " GEMTECH " (herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/s . Gemtech Weighing Instruments , 4- A/ 17, Gautam Gali New Viswash Nagar, Sahadara , Delhi - 110032 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/2004/38 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 60 Kg. and ninimum capacity of 200g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and above 300 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and withe value of 1 × 10%, 2× 10k or 5 × 10k, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 160 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 243
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi, the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 93. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating non- automatic (Plat form type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PES/ 85 - F " series of medium accuracy (Ac- curacy class - III) and with brand name " PREMIER" (herein referred to as said Model) manufactured by M/ s . Premier Engineering Works , 16A, Halderpara Lane, Howrah- 711 104 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003 /507;
MODEL : PES -85 / F
The said Model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120 kg . and minimum capacity of 400g . The verification scale interval (e) is 20 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
Sealing: In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model is be cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity upto 300 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 110k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 %, k, being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (65)/2000]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 244
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 94. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेनसुई इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स यूनिट-11 , सं. 3 , सैक्टर -1 , परवानू, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ए सी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेनसन ", है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 130 सननुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल पर आधारित टेबलटाप प्रकार का अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सोलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित विनिर्मित मॉडल किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मांन के लिए, 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 36 )/2004 ]
पो. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 245 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 94. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "ACS" series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SANSUN" ( herein referred to as said Model ) manufactured by M/ s . Sansui Electronics Unit - 11 , No 3 , Sector - 1 , Parwanoo , Himachal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 2004 / 130 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load ceil based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 Kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( c) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value 1 mg to 50 mg and of 1 g . with verification scale interval (n) in a range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (36)/2004)
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 246
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 95.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेनसुई इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स यूनिट- II , सं. 3, सैक्टर-1, परवानू, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए सी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेनसन " , है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/131 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ;
TARE
उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित टेबलटाप प्रकार का अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 'वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में , सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए, 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकत्तम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 36)/2004 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 247 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 95. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing Instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " ACS" series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name "SANSUN" (herein referred to as the said Model) manufactured by M/s . Sansui Electronics Unit - II , No. 3 , Sector - 1, Parwanoo, Himachal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2004/131;
TARE
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 Kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing resuit. The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Htz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the said weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e value of 100 mg to 2 g . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' 3 ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k, is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prin- ciple, design and with the said same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (36)/2004]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3830 Gl/2004-6 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
248
तिक गैस मंत्रालय
पेट्रोलियम और
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी , 2005
भूमिके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री वी.पी. पाठक, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, एम.बी. - 7 , महाश्वेता नगर, महेन्द्र भटनागर मार्ग , उज्जैन-456010 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: देवास राज्य: मध्य प्रदेश
तहसील: देवास
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
क्र. ग्राम का नाम सं.
का.आ. 96.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में, उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन , महाराष्ट्र राज्यक्षेत्र के भीतर भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की मुम्बई रिफाइनरी से मुम्बई हवाई अड्डे तक की ए.टी.एफ. पाइपलाइन के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का निर्वहन के लिए श्री प्रहलाद वी. कचारे, उप जिलाधिकारी , नाशिक क्षेत्र, महाराष्ट्र सरकार को प्राधिकृत करती है ।
4
3
2
1
[फा. सं. आर- 31015 / 13 /2004- ओआर- II ]
0.0780
1(नदी)
1. होशियार खेड़ी
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
0.1368
107
0.4250
105
0.4824
106
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS N Delhi , the 3rd January, 2005
0.0540
101
0.2844
99
0.1296
95
0.0228
96 (शा. सड़क)
0.1476
70
0.5400
62
0.0046
72
0.0640
73
S.O. 96. In pursuance of clause (a ) of Seciton 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri Prahalad V. Kachare , Deputy Collector , Nashik Circle , Government of Maharashtra to perform the functions of the competent authority for Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited's ATF Pipeline from Mumbai Refinery to Mumbai Airport, under the said Act , within the territory of Maharashtra .
0.5040
60
0.0678
4 ( नदी)
[F. No. R- 31015/ 13 /2004-OR - II] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .
0.0360
214(नदी)
2. सिरोंज
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी , 2005
0.2840
256
0.2080
23
0.0940
275
0.1080
276
0.1728
283
0.1296 का.आ. 97.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक़ पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
282
0.0166
291
0.3600
290
0.0216
294(शा. सड़क)
0.1800
296
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
0.1584
304
0.0056
299
0.0720
300
0.1440
303
0.1836
313
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खजिन पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) , की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
0.2700
314
0.0360
317 (शा. सड़क)
0.0180
316
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
249.
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
12
4
3
1 2
3
4 356
3. आंट
0.0360
0.0288
4. बैरागढ़- जारी 1226 (शा. सड़क)
307
0.0540
0.0288
1291 (शा. भूमि)
310
0.1152
1290
0.1458 313
0.1260
1289
0.1008 314
0.0738
241
0.0720 315
0.0900
421
0.3002 316
0.0954
0.0890
420
317
0.0054
419
0.1332 319
0.0054
191
0.1962 320
0.3888
0.4777
201
288
0.1080
200
0.3114 287
0.2073
210
0.3312 274
0.1368
209
0.0054 275
0.0684
0.0324
212
276
0.1098
275
0.0972 277
0.2883
215
0.2308 266
0.0324
274
0.2106 1063
0.0432
4. बैरागढ़
0.0180
216
1064
0.0216
217
0.2012 1065
0.0054
218
0.1482 1066
0.1422
219
0.0253 1091
0.0684
222
0,2808 1072
0.2985
223
0.0216 1074
0.1288
221
0.1224 1075
0.0972
220
0.0090 1076
0.0252
0.0036
224
1077
0.0060
0.1512
227
1078
0.0972
0.3096
235
0.2646
234
0.0342
1133 (शा. सड़क )
233
0.0360 1188
0.0756
0.01728
1174
0.0380
5. कवडी
486 (शा. भूमि)
0,0900
1176
405
0.2325
0.0828
1177, 1178
406
0,1800 1186
0.0791
407
0.1586
0.2016
1185
0.1721
408
1208
0.1044
409
0.1232 1209
0.0134
460
0.1800 1210
0.1440
410
0.0900
0.1620
1212
0.2880
416
1213
0.0252
415
0.0090
0.0360
1225
420
0.4320 1224
0.1098
426
0.1152 1223
0.1080
0.0876
427 250
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
1 2
3
4
429
4. कवडी जारी
0.1627
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
3
4 1 2
95
8. निकलंक
430
0.0576
431
0.1620
185
0.0090
186
0,2376
126
0.1260
127
0.2430
129
0.1800
0.3060
130
40
0.4770
11
0.1008
10
0.1080
9
0.1152
8
0.1350
20
0.0360
0.0360 6. कोलुखेड़ी
107 (शा. भूमि)
0.0540
84 (शा. सड़क)
39
0,2196
40
2880
0.0450
93
0.5086
101
0.4657
0.0360
82 (शा. सड़क)
73
0.1011
71
0,3502
70
0.0936
52
0.1044
0.0540
34
29
0.3924
30
0.0180
26
0.1440
24
0.0180
25
0,0090
9
0.1890
10
0.2196
11
0.4981
0.0360
1 (शा . भूमि)
7
0,0540 9. भानोली
41
0.0288
61
0.0900
60
0.0900
64
0.3330
82
0.5256
82/118
0.1260
78
0.3060
74
0.0090
0,0360
75 (शा. सड़क)
0.0360
43 (शा. सड़क)
7. नरखेड़ी
123
0.2074
46
0.0216
45
0.0090
0.1260
44
122
0.0198
37
0.1800
36
0.0180
368
0,0648
367
0.4356
366
0.1928
362
0:1350
0.5670
363
0.0252
365 (शा. नाला)
0.2556
159
156
0.0540
158
0.0540
0.0270
154
152
0.1170
153
0.0108
0.0180
133
132
0.1872
130
0.4392
0.0090
109
83
0.2494 10. जिवाजीपुरा
38
0.2183
30
0.1951
12
0.3174
0.0540
13
7
0.0216
0.2749
8
6
0.0360
0.0054
47
48
0.4230
0.2040
32
31
0.1440
29
0.1656
28
0.1674 251 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18, 1926 :
1 2
3
4
4
1 2
3
0.0324
62
281
0.2538 10. जिवाजीपुरा- जारी
13. मैंसुनी-जारी
266
0.3168 9
0.0288
11. सालमखेड़ी
269
0.0180 7
0.4986
0.0090
0.0180
3/190, 16
268 (शा. सड़क )
20
0.3456
258
0.1440 21
259
0.4620
0.1170 31
0.1314
0,0720
260 (शा. नाला )
32
0.1440
240
0.0363 33
0.2970
0.0756
243
1
0.0288
145
0.0180 363
0.0360
170
0.1440 12. बरखेड़ी कायम
339
0.1800
170/425
0:0450 338
0,0900
199
0.1440
0.0900
337
176
0.7596
178
0.1620
0.0288
334(शा. सड़क)
179
0.1440 333
0.1260
0.4500
181
328
0.2448
216
0.0360 327
0.3240
263
0.0630 326
0.0180
14. सुमराखेड़ा
0.0396 323
255
0.0270
0.1548
254
0.2700 280
0.03%
252
322
0,0054
253
0.0684
0.2610
318,319
446
0.0180 317
0.2970
15. पंथमुंडला
0.0396
481
284
0.2880
480
0.0792 285
0.1080
0.3600
0.0684
477 (शा. सड़क)
289
476
0.1530 286
0.0810
0.0585
472
0.0630
255
0:0612
471
245
0.3796
0.1008
468
247
0.2871
466
0.1080 220
0.1980
463
0.2160
0.0324
219 (शा. सड़क)
0.2484
448
206
0.540
447
0.1044 205
0.0180
0.1116
445
443
0.1188
0.0270
310 (शा. नाला)
13. भैंसुनी
288
0.5004
0.1080
396(रेल भामि)
393
0.0792 306
0.1404
394
0.1080 289
0.2700
0.0054
392
0.0126
289
0.0090
0,0900
325 (शा. नाला)
291,282
0.0180 293
0.0720
326 (शा. भूमि) 252
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
1 2
3
4
2
1
3
4
476
321
जवासिया-जारी
0.0612
0:3690 15. पंथमुडमा ( जारी )
320
0,0900
474
0.0180 319
0.0090
475
0.1211 317
0.1764
0.0720
522 (शा. सड़क)
307
0.0630
0.0630
524 (शा. भूमि)
308
0.0144
525
0.3510 135
0.1800
529
0.0900 132
0.0360
527
0.1800 134
0.0630
0.0180 133
0.1440
544(शा. सड़क)
382
0.1080
0.0234
1277 (शा. भूमि)
381
0.1512
0.0180
126 (शा. नाला)
379
0.576
0.0630
12.5. (शा. भूमि)
377
0.360 124
0.1440
0.968
376
121
0.1638
375
0.0810 120
0.0090
119
0.1944
0.0360
343 (शा. नाला)
845
0.0180
0.3276
321
16. सुनवानी गोपाल
1855
0.0720
0.4266
319
856
0,0900
0.0090
320
8557
0,0900
0.0288
290, 291 (शा. नाला )
858
0.1530
289
0.0090 859
0.4410
0.1800
288
860
0.0054
0.0216
287 (शा. सड़क)
832
0.0936
286
0.1800 833.824
0.1710
825
0.3168
[फा.सं. आर. - 31015/65/2004- ओ आर- II ] 822
0.0720
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव 826
0.0540
New Delhi , the 3rd January , 2005 806
0.0684
793
0.4644
791
0,1404
184
0.1530
185
0.1026
S.O. 97. Whereas it appears to the Central Gov- ernment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
179
0.0810
167
0.1620
168
0.0126
165
0.2376
And whereas it appears to the Central Government thatfor the purpose of laying such pipeline it is neces- sary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is de- scribed in the Schedule annexed hereto;
0.0288
164
457
17. जवासिया
0.1260
490
0.1422
488
0.2094
0.1800
487
477
0.5580
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of ection 3 of the Petroleum and Min- erals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein; Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schecule may within twenty one days from the date on 253
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notificaiton are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of right of user therein for lay- ing of the pipeline under the land to Shri V.P. Pathak , Competent Authority, Mumbai- Manglya Pipeline Exten- sion Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, MB- 7, Mahashweta Nagar , Mahendra Bhatnagar Road, Ujjain -456010 (Madhya Pradesh).
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Dewas District : Dewas State: Madhya Pradesh
Area in Hectare S. No. Name of Village Survey No.
2
4 1
3
0.0780 1. Hoshiyara Khedi 1 (River)
107
0.1368
105
0.4250
0.4824
106
0.0540
101
99
0.2844
95
0.1296
0.0228
96(Govt. road)
70
0.1476
62
0.5400
0.0046
72
0,0640
73
60
0.5040
0.0678
4(River)
0.0360
214(River)
2. Sironj
256
0.2840
0.2080
278
0,0940
275
276
0.1080
0.1728
283
0.1296
282
291
0.0166
0.3600
290
0.0216
294(Govt. road)
296
0.1800
0.1584
304
0.0056
299
300
0.0720
0.1440
303
0.1836
313
0.2700
314
0.0360
317(Govt . road)
0.0180
316
1 2
3
4 3. ANT
356
0.0360
307
0.0540
310
0.1152
313
0.1260
314
0.0738
315
0.0900
316
0.0954
317
0.0054
319
0.0054
320
0.3888
288
0.1080
287
0.2073
274
0.1368
275
0.0684
276
0.1098
277
0.2883
266
0.0324
1063
0.0432 4. Bairagarh
1064
0.0216
1065
0.0054
1066
0.1422
1091
0.0684
1072
0.2985
1074
0.1288
1075
0.0972
1076
0.0252
177
0.1512
1078
0.0972
0.0342 1133 (Govt. road)
1188
0.0756
1174
0.1728
1176
0.0900
0.0828
1177,1178
1186
0.0791
1185
0.2016
1208
0.1044
1209
0.0134
1210
0.1440
1212
0.1620
1213
0.0252 Bairagarh
1225
0.0360
1224
0.1098
1223
0.1080 254
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
4
1 2
3
1 2
4
3
0.0288
429
0.1627 4. Bairagarh-contd. 1226 (Govt. Road)
0.0288
430
0.0576 1291 ( Govt . Land)
1290
0.1458
431
0.1620 1289
185
0.1008
0.0090 241
0.0720
186
0.2376
0.3002
421
126
0.1260 420
0.0890
127
0.2430
0,1800
129
419
0.1332
130
0.3060 191
0.1962
40
0.4770 201
0.4777
11
0.1008 200
0.3114
10
0.1080 210
0.3312
9
0.1152
0.0054
209
8
0.1350 212
0.0324
20
0,0360 275
0.0972
0.0360
6. Kolukhedi
215
107(Govt. Land)
0.2308
0.0540
84(Govt. Road)
274
0.2106
39
0.2196 216
0.0180
40
0.2880 217
0.2012
41
0.0288 218
0.1482
61
0,0900 219
0.0253
60
0.0900 222
0.2808
64
0.3330 223
0.0216
0.5256
82
221
0.1224
82/118
0.1260 220
0.0090
78
0.3060
0.0036
224
74
0.0090 227
0.0060
0,0360
75(Govt. Road)
235
0.3096
0,0360
7. Narkhedi
43(Govt. Road)
0,2646
234
123
0,2074
0.0360
233
46
0.0216
0,0380
5. Kavadi
486 (Govt . Land)
45
0.0090 405
0.2325
44
0.1260 406
0.1800
0.0198
122
407
0.1586
37
0.1800 408
0.1721
36
0.0180 409
0.1232
38
0.2183 460
0.1800
30
0.1951
0.0900
410
12
0.3174 416
0.2880
13
0.0540
Narkhedi
415
0,0090
0.0216
7
420
0.4320
8
0.2749 426
0.1152
6
0,0360 427
0.0876
4
191 255 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18, 1926
1 2
3
4
4
1
3
2
32
8. Niklank
95
0.0450
0.1440
0.5086
33
0.2970 93
1
0.4657
0.0288 101
363
0.0360
0.0360 82(G. Road)
12. Barkhedi Kayam
339
0.1800
0.1011
73
71
338
0.0900
0.3502
70
337
0,0900
0.0936
52
0.1044
0.0288
334(G. Road)
333
0.1260 34
0,0540
328
29
0.3924
0.2448
327
30
0.3240
0.0180
326
26
0.1440
0.0180 24
0.0180
323
0.0270
280
0.1548
0.0090
25
322
0.0054
0,1890
9
10
0.2610
0.2196
318,319
317
11
0.2970
0.4981
284
0.2880
0.0360
1(G. Land)
7
285
0.1080
0.0540
0.0648
289
0.0684 368
286
367
0.0810
0.4356
9. Bhanoli !
0.0630
0.1928
366
255 (G. Road)
0.3796
0.1350
362
245
247
363
0:2871
0.5670
0.1980
220
0.0252
365(G. Drain)
0.0324
0.2556
159
219(G. Road)
206
0,5040
0,0540
156
205
0,0180
0.0540
158
0.0270 154
0.0270
13. Bhainsuni 310(G. Drain)
0.5004
288
0.1170
152
306
0.1404
0.0108
153
0.0180
133
0.2700
289
280
0.0126
-0.1872
132
0,0900
0.4392
130
291,292
0.0720
293
0.0090
109
0.2538 83
281
0.2494
10. Jiwajipura
266
0.3168
0.0054
47
0.0180
0.4230
48
269
0.0090
0.2040
32
268(G. Road)
258
0.1440 31
0.1440
259
0.1170 29
0.1656
0.0720
0.1674
28
260(G. Drain)
0.0363
240
62
0.0324
0.0756
243
9
0.0288
11. Salamkhedi
0.0180
145
7
0.4986
170
0.1440
0.0180
3/190, 16
0.0450
170/425
0.3456
20
199
0.1440
0.4620
21
176
0.7596 31
0.1314
3830 Gl/2004-7 256
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
1 2
4
3
178
0.1620 13. Bhainsuni Contd .
179
0.1440
181
0.4500
216
0.0360
263
0.0630 14. Sumarakheda
255
0.0396
254
0.2700
252
0.0396
253
0.0684
446
0.0180 15. Panthmundala
481
0.0396
480
0.0792
0.0360
477(G. Road)
476
0.1530
472
0.0585
471
0.0612
468
0.1008
466
0.1080
463
0.2160
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
4 1 2
3
857
0.0900
858
0.1530
0.4410
859
860
0.0054
832
0.0936
0.1710
833.824
825
0.3168
822
0.0720
0.0540
826
0.0684
806
793
0.4644
791
0.1404
0.1530
184
185
0.1026
179
0.0810
167
0.1620
168
0.0126
165
0.2376
164
0.0288
457
0.1260 17. Jawasiya
448
0.2484
447
0.1044
445
0.1116
443
0.1188
0.1080
396 (Railway Land)
393
0.0792
394
0.1080
392
0.0054
0.0090
325 (G. Drain)
0.0180
326 (G. Land)
0.0612
321
320
0.0900
319
0.0090
317
0.1764
307
0.0630
308
0.0144
135
0.1800
0.0360
132
134
0.0630
133
0.01440
0.0234
127(G. Road)
0.0180
126 (G. Drain)
0.0630
125 (G. Land)
124
0.1440
121
0.1638
120
0.0090
119
0.1944
845
0.0180 16. Sunvani Gopal
855
0.0720
856
0.0900
490
0.1422
488
0.2094
487
0.1800
477
0,5580
476
0.3690
474
0.0180
475
0.1211
0.0720
522(G. Road)
0.0630
524(G. Land)
525
0.3510
529
0.0900
527
0.1800
0.0180
544(G. Road)
382
0.1080
381
0.1512
0,576
379
377
0.360
376
0.968
375
0.0810
0,0360
343 (G. Drain)
0.3276
321
0.4266
319
320
0.0090
0.0288 290, 291 (G. Drain)
289
0,0090
288
0.1800
0.0216
287 (G. Road)
286
0,1800
[F. N. R- 31015 / 65/2004 -II]
HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy .
257 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8,2005/पौष 18,1926
नई दिल्ली, 5 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 98.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा - दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद परियोजना हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड, 16 कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास , गोपालपुरा बाईपास रोड, जयपुर -302018 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 258
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8, 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926
अनुसूची तहसील : कोटपूतली
[PART II-SEC . 2 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3 1 . ठीकरिया
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6
5
4
43
0
01
497/660 (स.भूमि)
0
67
19
499(स.चरागाह)
0
78
55
633(स. चरागाह)
624
625
627
622
628/662
628
617
616 0
84
00
0
15
80 0
25
28 0
30
00
19
73 0
0
05
32
01
85 0
0
34
09
34
01
0
608(स.नाली)
601
604
605
606
00
0
20 0
32
00
15
0
42 0
95
18
03
0
59
600 (स.नाली)
580
3683 2. तुलसीपुरा
0
39
24
0
07
04
01
56
3676/3709 (स.भूमि)
3676
3675
3671
3670
70 3. टोरडा ब्राह्मणान्
67
66
59
49
58
55
50 0
54
01
68 0
13
0
16
64 0
32
13
0
02
04 0
16
67
14
0
82
40
12
0
0
32
83
07
21 0
24 0
06
0
00
20 0
01
68
41(स.नाला)
4 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii ) ]
259
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
1
2
3
19 टोरडा ब्राह्मणान् (जारी...)
3.
18
17
16
15 4. बडनगर
3504
3493 (स. रास्ता)
3492
3491
3489
3488
3484
3465
3457
3456
3455
3416
3419
3417
3418
3403
3400
3399
3395
3373
3377
3376
2124(स.रास्ता) 5. भांकरी
1498 (स. चरागाह)
1497
1499
1496
1507
1506
1505
1517
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6
5
4
92 0
19
14.
13
0
0
14
18 0
24
02 0
25
42 0
08
08
0
02
25 0
03
87 0
14
10 0
10
89 0
27
15
0
49
13
0
16
86 0
22
12
0
92
02
0
04
75 0
02
91 0
04
97 0
00
80
97 0
21
0
48
17
0
74
06
02
0
73
16
80 0
00
89 0
03
33 0
22
99 0
09
01
10
0
11
17
0
12
14
0
38
85 0
02
0
09
72
20 0
13
0
68
10
44 0
08 260
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926 [PART II- SEC . 2(ii) ]
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : कोटपूतली
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर एयर
6 2
4
5
1
3
05
0
21
1518
5. भांकरी (जारी ...)
0
06
42
1528(स.भूमि)
11
0
02
2150
0
80
18
2145
0
10
78
2144
22
05
0
2140
0
17
19
2134
0
15
2133
39
0
03
2132
16
0
42
1985
24
0
84
13
1969
0
07
85
1986
1968
0
24
26
0
16
71
1967
1966
07
0
84
1948
0
29
99
0
58
29
1950
0
79
03
1933(स. नाली)
1806
0
04
98
0
1807
18
36
1797
0
12
49
0
20
1796
00
0
05
12
1796/2274
0
08
24
1784
0
06
26
813
6. मंडा
0
02
48
812
810
0
10
04
0
00
809
89
797
0
01
18
09
81
796
0
0
07
71
795
43
0
05
794
63
793
0
28
0
00
37
792
71
789
0
00
01
790
0
08 261
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005 / पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 2 (ii ) ]
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
तहसील : कोटपूतली
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
787 6. मंडा (जारी ... )
788(स.रास्ता)
774(स.रास्ता)
705
708
709
694
710
693
716
717
692
720
721(स. रास्ता)
722
725
657
658
650
649
619(स.नाला)
616
615
612
611
6.03
604
1396
1395
1401
1404
1460
1468
1467
1461
1462
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6 0
00
63 0
00
91
76 0
01
40
06
0
0
09
99
32 0
00
07
38 0
0
17
12
0
20
00
44 0
01
88 0
08
0
20
00
0
17
06
01
0
50
11
47 0
0
16
54 0
55
08
0
09
29 0
15
74 0
04
67 0
51
14
15
70 0
08
97 0
0
05
01
65 0
12
00
39 0
15
0
18 0
77
01
16
21 0
53 0
18
36 0
21
83 0
02
0
12
35 0
94
01
00
0
50
34 0
02 262
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II -SEC . 2 ( ii )]
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
तहसील : कोटपूतली
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर एयर
5
4
6 1
2
3
0
07
70
1455
0
01
1463
88 6. मंडा (जारी... ) (मंडा)
1454
0
12
62
0
13
1493
85
0
83
1494
16
0
20
00
1496
22
95
0
1495
25
0
09
1500
29
0
09
1501
0
20
00
1499
37
18
1502
0
03
14
248
7. राजनोता
05
0
10
249
20
0
00
253
0
59
252
13
83
0
07
261
83
262
02
0
02
26
260
0
20
0
00
259
76
0
14
270
0
00
25
271
69
0
12
333
55
0
08
332
15
88
330
09
61
0
329
52
0
11
324
28
0
09
323
0
00
74
341
93
0
01
536
05
30
0
537.
05
0
56
538
14
0
00
539
15
35
0
549
34
0
00
551
66
0
01
550
0
12
73
552 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2(ii) ]
263
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
3 1
2
583 7. राजबोता (जारी...)
584
582
595
596
597
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
-4
5
6 0
12
82 0
30
00
0
06
05 0
30
00
08
74 0
0
08
28 0
23
73
598(स. चरागाह)
599
600 0
20
99 0
38
03
1
41
61
836(स.चरागाह)
27
02 0
2(स.नदी)
8. दादुका
251 (स. नदी)
46
50 0
}
251 मिन1 (एस.आर.पी. नदी)
0
60
19
322(एस.आर.पी.)
72 0
10
322/1345
0
65
11
323/1306
0
11
24
323/1305
323 0
01
59
44
01
0
324(एस.आर.पी. रास्ता)
427
426
14 0
11
63 0
04
0
13
54
425(एस.आर.पी.नाला)
12 0
10
424(एस.आर.पी.)
422 0
04
10
17
35 0
464(एस.आर.पी.नाला)
474
475
67 0
01
05 0
12
00
78 0
475/1334(एस.आर.पी.)
48
00
0
382(स.रास्ता)
482
483
484
486
502
501
508/1324 3830 Gl/2004-8
0
06
79
41 0
01
28 0
04
35 0
02
0
86
05
20
00
0
07
84 0 264
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
[PART 11-SEC. 2 ( ii ) | राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
3
2
1
503 दादुका (जारी...)
8.
504
507
505
506
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6 0
20
00
0
07
90 0
00
58 0
34
05
96
17
0
50
42
0
592(एस.आर.पी. नाला)
590
585
589
588
660
661
662
663
56 0
11
0
02
21 0
07
29 0
03
53
00
0
20
48 0
07
0
34
06
13
0
54 0
34
08
672(स .रास्ता)
834
833
704
705
703
706
709
732
731
730
737
729
728
738
727
726
718
723
724
725
1322 9. बसई
0
08
91
09
19 0
19
96 0
06
41 0
08
91
63 0
09
0
17
10 0
19
89 0
09
26 0
54
11
0
41
01
0
07
00 0
47
03
13
50 0
11
27 0
08
04 0
03
01
13
0
08
00
0
20
26 0
14
97 0
27 भारत का राजपत्रं : जनवरी 8, 2005/ पौष 18 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 2 (ii ) ]
तहसील : कोटपूतली
265 राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
1319 बसई (जारी... )
9.
1318
1316
1315
1237
1314
1238
1301
1300
1299
1291
1290
1287
1289
1288
1273
1267
1266
1262
1261
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6 0
07
31
90 0
09
0
13
10
11
0
16
00
20 0
14
10
0
20
00
0
15
52 0
89
01
0
10
13
0
27
48 0
0
79
12
20 0
00
0
00
20
12
0
60
16
0
52 0
09
88
06
75 0
0
18
05
20
00
0
0
01
12
1054(स .रास्ता)
1033
1032
1030
1031
1026
1023
1022
987
988
1020
989
990
979
978
977
78 0
00
10 0
18
0
00
39
00
20 0
64 0
06
07 0
05
BO
04
0
50 0
01
0
67
16
25
00
0
26
02
0
63
16
0
16
62
20 0
00
58 0
08 266
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
[PART II-SEC . 2( ii) ]
जिला: जयपुर
कम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
1
2
3
919 9. बसई (जारी...)
920
916
921
915
914
913
864
865
867
876
900
877
883
886
885
889
890
83 10. नोंगल पण्डितपुरा
84
82
81
91
92
94
93
97
98
103
102
101
118
119
121
138 101
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
5
6 4
05
0
95 0
02
91 0
00
20
55 0
06
00
72 0
94
04
0
09
45 0
0
01
39 0
30
21
13
01
0
0
26
49 0
05
79 0
11
01
0
16
84 0
26
98 0
00
20 0
09
25
0
00
20 0
88
20
20 0
00
0
23
76 0
00
54 0
09
27 0
16
56 0
12
06
0
17
46 0
60
04
0
15
74 0
00
20 0
06
13
0
05
03 0
09
81 0
05
04
96 0
21
99 0
09 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2 (ii) ]
267
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
3
2
139 10. बॉगल पण्डितपुरा (जारी ...)
140
263
141
149
261
240
239
190
191
198
197
196
202
2135 11. बुचाहेडा
2138
2137
2144
2145
2146
2149
2150
2151
2024
2023
2017
2016
2010
1986 (स.रास्ता)
1963
1964
1966
1972
1969
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
5
4
6
11
0
52 0
47
06
0
13
42 0
00
20
04
0
38 0
15
69 0
09
54 0
32
40 0
69
21
0
12
81 0
08
45 0
26
37 0
05
38 0
10
55 0
02
71 0
19
53 0
24
21 0
00
40 0
74
13
0
01
89 0
76
16
0
10
98 0
20
00
0
04
84 0
41
37
05
0
67 0
18
46
00
0
25
01
0
62
99 0
10
47 0
12
0
40
13
10
64 0
02
76 0 268
[PART II-SEC . 2( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : कोटपूतली
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर एयर
6 1
4
5
2
3
95
0
15
1971
11. बुचाहेडा (जारी ...)
93
0
1978
16
0
45
01
1529(स . रास्ता)
0
26
54
1914
0
32
1532
09
71
0
05
1532/3376
0
00
50
1531
0
62
01
1533(स. रास्ता)
0
1536
25
13
0
1537
00
45
0
38
1564
15
0
79
07
1563
17
1562
0
46
40
0
00
1560
11
62
0
1561
0
1559
00
20
0
11
54
1557
0
00
1558
40
11
0
68
1556
0
36
01
1594(स .रास्ता)
00
0
78
1639
0
12
46
1643
0
62
1642
12
0
28
25
1641
0
34
53
1625
75
01
1656
0
0
00
49
1658
35
60
160
0
12. बालावास
00
30
0
158
01
0
18
157
03
11
0
161
25
0
05
162
23
81
0
163
95
0
00
148(स.रास्ता)
269
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष18,1926
[ भाग II - खण्ड 2( ii ) ]
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
तहसील : कोटपूतली
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
98 12. बालावास (जारी... )
96
95
94
86 (स.रास्ता)
68
69
1358 13. बाबास
1359
1360
1361
1355
1160/1484
1160
1172
1173
1171
1164
1168
1167
1166
1165
897 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
994
992
991
990
813(स .रास्ता)
812
796(स. रास्ता)
711
710
714
715
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6
16
93 0
16
52 0
11
25 0
0
11
39
00 0
02
0
26
07
95
08
0
03
53
06
63 0
0
09
00 0
02
52
14
36 0
0
04
06 0
01
91 0
04
24 0
00
64 0
15
03 0
20
00
25
00
0
16
16 0
04
97 0
09
79 0
04
25 0
26
54 0
23
94 0
22
32 0
01
08 0
64
00
07
22 0
0
01
29
04
03
0
0
20
57 0
14
97 0
00
20 [PART II-SEC. 2 (ii ) ] 270
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : कोटपूतली
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर
गाँव का नाम
एयर
6
4
5
1
2
3
03
34
716
0
13. बहावास (जारी ...)
03
0
09
754
719
0
10
14
12
25
721
0
66
0
08
722
07
747
0
08
10
0
07
749
0
23
746
07
0
70
745
17
0
15
74
744
0
27
41
736
0
00
88
737(स .रास्ता)
69
0
113
01
0
07
56
110
0
72
08
111
112
0
21
01
G
12
60
146मिन
146/1
0
01
36
147
75
0
11
145
01
155
56
0
0
24
15
156
0
60
161
14
0
190
37
13
0
90
189
01
188
0
41
11
12
192
0
94
16
0
11
199
00
20
0
195
08
72
0
198
63
0
11
197
56
26
14. बासडी
1712
0
79
00
0
1708(स .रास्ता)
47
64
1721
10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii) ]
271
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
2
3 1
14. बासडी (जारी...)
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
6 4
5
0
01
13
1723 (स. रास्ता)
1725
41
0
93
47 0
01
1642(स.रास्ता)
1640
630 15. खेडकी वीरभान्
631
632 16. मोलाहेडा
830
831
832
836
821
839
820
47 0
04
0
76
17
0
50
13
0
00
38 0
08
91 0
40
06
09
0
62 0
95
11
0
22
30 0
00
20 0
02
00 0
62
01
860 (स.भूमि)
670
819
671
672
673
808/1017
806
805
760
761
762
767/1026
767 0
97
01
19
03
0
0
29
09
07
96 0
09
0
84 0
81
05
03
0
16 0
05
69 0
07
84 0
08
91 0
16
43
01
00 0
46
19
0
37
0
48
775 (स.आहेड)
18 0
31
772(स.भूमि)
465 17. शेखुपुर
466
467
468 3830 Gl /2004-9
02
31 0
0
32
12
0
43
07
48 0
01 272
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8, 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
[PART II-SEC . 2 (ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
471 17. शेखुपुर (जारी ... )
470
472
482
766
765
764
763
762
615
613
614
622
623
628
627
634
633
632
631
$46
645
649
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
5
6 4
0
16
09
52 0
13
0
00
20 0
01
42
93 0
16
0
02
95 0
05
13
71 0
16
07 0
11
0
33
21
0
20
00
0
05
35
13
06
0
02
29 0
0
06
27 0
00
20 0
72
13
97 0
03
0
37
05
0
01
30
64 0
08
0
14
05
07
0
88 0
01
42
656(स.रास्ता)
661 0
16
01
0
05
03
660 (स . नदी)
662
663 0
43
03
0
10
29
89 0
03
664(स . नदी)
665
666
669
670 18. बीजाहेडा
698 104
0
04
03
80
06
0
01
63 0
09
22 0
0
09
27 273
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 2(ii) ]
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
2
3 1
697 18. बीजाहेडा (जारी... )
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6
08
35 0
0
36
00
700(स.रास्ता)
701
696 0
00
20 0
20
00
63 0
00
694(स .रास्ता)
692
685
684
680
681
675
674
672
673
658
660
656
649
650
647
646
639
640
637
638
629
626
628
620
621
619
607
606
602 0
07
92
20 0
00
0
09
45
20
00
0
69 0
10
0
20
00
0
61
09
00
0
20
79
09
0
0
12
69
47 0
07
0
01.
08
13 0
05
20 0
07
87 0
12
0
08
10
36 0
09
00
20 0
20 0
00
35 0
08
0
77
10
44 0
00
0
15
67 0
01
69
07
11 0
0
03
42 0
58
00
85 0
07
0
00
79 274
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
[PART II-SEC . 2(ii ) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
1
2
3
603 18. बीजाहेडा (जारी ...)
591
593
585
583
584
569
568
567
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6
17 0
08
0
74
17
0
01
92 0
64
10
0
04
93 0
03
95 0
92
05
0
69
02
0
61
08
0
01
85
201 (स.रास्ता)
196
197
195
193
152
160
157
156
158
155
143
142
141
122
121
124
125
120
126
110 0
96
01
0
04
30 0
03
05 0
18
20 0
14
71 0
17
01
0
06
88 0
03
95
42 0
02
02
50 0
0
07
37 0
11
75 0
00
20 0
01
62 0
03
66 0
05
06 0
07
23 0
03
58 0
09
21 0
02
77
20 0
01
97(स.रास्ता)
81
83
86
48 0
09
0
16
58 0
21
15 [भाग II- खण्ड 2 ( ii) ]
275
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
75 18. बीजाहेडा (जारी...)
76
69
67
35
36
38
39 19. पनियाला
1311
1323
1329
1330
1331
1339
1334
1338
1347
1348
1501
1500
1499
1498
1496
1495
1494
1493
1491
1492
1643
1647
1648
1659
1657
1656
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6 0
68
12
38
00
0
20 0
00
74 0
18
0
08
13 0
07
80 0
20
13
0
14
87 0
88
13
0
13
64 0
13
36 0
34
15
0
00
40
17
0
64 0
01
31
60 0
03
0
03
88 0
00
22 0
07
52 0
12
73 0
48
15
0
15
52
03 0
09
0
06
69 0
12
64 0
09
05
0
23
01
0
15
35 0
17
76
16
0
04 0
14
45
76 0
10
0
03
01
27 0
10 276
[PART II-SEC . 2 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : कोटपूतली
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 2
4
6 1
3
5
1664
0
10
86 पनियाला (जारी... )
19.
0
16
57
1665
00
70
1666
0
00
0
76
1668(स .रास्ता)
04
0
12
1673
0
00
79
2158
58
0
02
2157
0
05
59
2156
20
0
00
1674
65
11
2155
0
03
29
0
2154
06
25
2128
0
89
03
0
2130
0
03
62
2131
03
0
08
2132
03
82
2133
04
94
0
2134
0
02
97
2074
07
03
2075
0
70
2076
0
06
0
12
52
2089
00
20
0
2088
0
06
38
2081
57
08
0
2087
06
67
0
2086
06
55
0
2083
01
73
0
2025
14
Q
76
2024
0
02
74
2023
0
12
05
1044
20. मोरदा
27
1045
0
09
00
35
1042
0
87
0
31
1069
0
87
11
1073 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii ) ]
277
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
तहसील : कोटपूतली
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
1
2
3
1074 मोरदा (जारी... )
20.
1065
1063
1101
1109
1110
1108
1107
1106
1105
1111 (स.भूमि)
1112
1113
1116(स.रास्ता)
1125
1117
1118
1124
1123
1122
1164
1165
1159
1158
1156
1155
4.140 (स.रास्ता)
883
881
882
872
871
873
869
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6 0
05
72 0
10
49
63 0
22
0
33
36 0
11
49
00
20
00
0
20 0
01
83
07
0
23
07
02 0
06
18 0
04
32 0
0
01
57
02
0
21 0
05
86
08
0
00 0
11
78
00
0
50
07
93
04
15 0
64 0
01
49 0
24
0
09
56
17
0
49 0
20
79
13
69 0
02
0
43
03
89 0
02
96 0
09
85 0
11 0
03
07
60 0
0
02
80
13
87 0 278
[PART II- SEC . 2 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : कोटपूतली
जिला: जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
गाँव का नाम
5
3
4
6 2
1
0
14
47
856
20. मोरदा (जारी...)
01
0
09
86.0
19
0
09
861
00
20
853
0
[फा. सं. आर-31015/64/2004-ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 5th January, 2005
S. O. 98. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri . Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority, Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , 16 Krishana Vihar, Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye - pass Road , Jaipur. 302018 ( Rajasthan).
181 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2 (ii) ]
279
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
1
3 1. THIKRIYA
Area
Are Sq.mtr .
Hectare
4
6
5
01 0
43
497/660(G/L)
0
19
67
499(G/L Pasture)
0
78
55
633(G/L Pasture)
624
625
627
622 0
84
00
0
80
15
0
25
28 0
00
30 0
73
628/662
628
617
616
19
0
05
32
85 0
01
34 0
09
34
01
0
608(G/L Nali)
601
604
605
606 0
00
20
00
32 0
0
15
42 0
18
95 0
03
59
600(G/L Nali )
580
3683 2. TULSIPURA
0
24
39
04 0
07
0
56
01
3676/3709(G/L)
3676
3675
3671
3670
70 3. TORDABRAHMNAN
67
66
59
49
58
55
50 0
01
54 0
13
68 0
16
64
13
32 0
0
02
04
67
16
0
0
82
14
40 0
12
0
83
32
0
07
21
24 0
06
20 0
00
0
01
68
41(G/L Nala)
3830 Gl/2004-10 280
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
PUTL!
Tens .
[PART II-SEC. 2(ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
3
2
3.
19 TORDABRAHMNAN
18 (Contd...)
17
16
15 4. BADNAGAR
3504 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
6
5
0
92
19
0
13
14 0
14
18 0
24
02 0
42
25
0
08
08
25 0
02
3493(G / L Cart Track)
3492
3491
3489
3488
3484
3465
3457
3456
3455
3418
3419
3417
3418
3403
3400
3399
3395
3373
3377
3376 0
03
87 0
14
10 0
10
89 0
15
27 0
13
49 0
16
86
12
0
22 0
02
92 0
75
04
0
02
91
97 0
04
00
80 0
0
21
97 0
17
48 0
06
74 0
02
73 0
16
80 0
00
89 0
03
33 0
22
99 0
01
09
2124(G/L Cart Track)
5. BHANKRI
0
10
11
1498 (G/L Pasture)
1497
1499
1496
1507
1506
1505
1517 101
0
17
12 0
14
38 0
02
85 0
09
72 0
13
20 0
10
68 0
08
44 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2(ii ) ]
281
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District: JAIPUR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3 1
2
1518 5. BHANKRI ( Contd ...)
State : RAJASTHAN
Area Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
6
5
0
21
05
0
06
42
1528(G/L)
2150
2145
2144
2140
2134
2133
2132
1985
1969
1986
1968
1967
1966
1948
1950 0
02
11 0
18
80
10
78 0
22
05 0
0
17
19
39 0
15
03 0
16
42 0
24
13
84 0
0
85
07
0
26
24
16
71 0
84 0
07
99 0
29
0
29
58 0
03
79
1933(G/L Nali )
1806
1807
1797
1796 0
04
98
36 0
18
12
49 0
00
20 0
12
05 0
1796/2274
1784
813 6. MANDA
812
810
809
797
796
795
794
793
792
789
790
24
08
0
26 0
06
48
02
6.0
0
10
04 0
89
00
0
01
18
81 0
09
07
71 0
43 0
05
63
28
0
37 0
00
71.
00
0
08
01
0 t
[PART II-SEC: 2 (ii )] 282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District : JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No
Are
Khasara No.
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
6
3
2
4
5
1
787
0
00
63 6. MANDA ( Contd ... )
0
00
91
788(G / L Cart Track)
76
0
01
774 (G / L Cart Track)
40
06
705
0
99
708
0
09
32
0
00
709
0
07
38
694
0
17
12
710
00
0
20
693
01
44
716
0
0
88
717
08
0
00
20
692
17
0
06
720
0
01
50
721 (G /L Cart Track)
0
47
722
11
0
16
54
725
55
08
657
0
09
658
29
0
15
74
650
0
04
67
649
14
51
0
619 (G/L Nala)
0
70
616
15
0
615
97
08
05
01
612
0
12
0
65
611
0
00
39
603
15
0
18
604
77
01
0
1396
0
16
21
1395
53
18
1401
0
21
36
1404
83
02
1460
0
0
12
35
1468
0
01
94
1467
50
00
1461
0
34
0
1462
02
101 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2 (ii ) ]
283
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/ पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Nameof the Village
3
2
1
1455 6. MANDA ( Contd ... )
1463
1454
1493
1494
1496
1495
1500
1501
1499
1502
248 7. RAJNOTA
249
253
252
261
262
260
259
270
271
333
332
330
329
324
323
341
536
537
538
539
549
551
550
552
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
07
70 0
01
0
88
62
12
0
13
85 0
83 0
16
00
20 0
22
95 0
09
25 0
09
29
00
20 0
37
18
0
14 0
03
0
10
05
00
20 0
13
59 0
0
83
07
83 0
02
0
02
26 0
00
20
76
14
0
00
25 0
12
69
55
08
0
0
88
15
61 0
09
0
11
52 0
28
09
74 0
00
0
01
93
30 0
05
05
56 0
00 0
14
35
15
0
34
00
01
66 0
0
12
73 284
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 2 (ii ) , Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No
Are
Khasara No.
Hectare
Sq.mtr Name of the Village
2
6 1
3
4
5
82
583
0
12
7. RAJNOTA ( Contd ... )
30
0
00
584
05
582
06
0
00
0
30
595
74
0
08
596
08
28
0
597
73
23
0
598 (G / L Pasture).
20
99
599
0
600
0
03
38
41
1
61
836(G / L Pasture)
02
27
0
2G/L River)
8. DADUKA
251(G/L River)
46
0
50
251Min1 ( SRP River)
}
60
0
19
322(SRP)
10
0
72
322/1345
65
11
323/1306
0
11
24
323/1305
0
59
323
0
01
44
01
0
324(SRP CartTrack)
14
427
0
11
63
0
04
426
0
54
13
425(SRP Nala)
10
12
0
424(SRP)
04
10
422
0
17
35
0
464(SRP Nala)
67
0
01
474
05
0
12
475
00
78
0
475/1334(SRP)
00
48
0
382(G/ L Cart Track)
0
06
79
482
41
01
483
0
0
04
28
484
35
0
02
486
0
86
502
05
0
00
20
501
0
07
84
508/1324
184 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii) ]
285
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District: JAIPUR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
2
3 1
503 8. DADUKA (Contd ... )
504
507
505
506
592(SRP Nala)
590
585
589
588
660
661
662
663
672(G /L Cart Track)
834
833
704
705
703
706
709
732
731
730
737
729
728
738
727
726
718
723
724
725
1322 9. BASAI
State: RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
6 4
5
20
00
07
90 0
00
58 0
34
05
0
17
0
96
50 0
42
0
11
56
21 0
02
07
29 0
0
53
03
20 0
00
0
07
48 0
06
34
13
54
34
08
0
0
08
91
19 0
09
0
96
19
0
06
41 0
91
08
63 0
09
10 0
17
0
19
89 0
09
26 0
11
54
01
41 0
00
07
0
03
47 0
13
50
11
0
27 0
08
04
03
01 0
13
08 0
00
20 0
14
26 0
97
27
0 286
[PART II- SEC . 2(il ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District : JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No
Are Sq.mtr .
Hectare
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
1
4
6 2
3
5
07
0
31
1319
9. BASAI ( Contd ...)
90
0
09
1318
13
10
1316
0
0
16
11
1315
0
1237
20
00
0
14
10
1314
0
00
20
1238
0
1301
15
52
1300
0
01
89
0
13
10
1299
0
27
48
1291
0
12
79
1290
00
20
1287
0
0
00
20
1289
0
12
60
1288
0
16
52
1273
0
1267
88
09
75
06
0
1266
1262
0
05
18
0
20
00
1261
0
12
01
1054 (G/ L Cart Track)
0
00
78
1033
0
18
10
1032
0
00
1030
39
0
00
20
1031
0
64
1026
06
07
1023
0
05
04
80
0
1022
01
50
987
0
0
16.
67
988
0
00
25
1020
26
0
02
989
63
0
990
16
62
16
0
979
20
0
00
978
58
0
08
977 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii) ]
287
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
919 9. BASAI ( Contd ... )
920
916
921
915
914
913
864
865
867
876
900
877
883
886
885
889
890
83 10. NAGAL PANDITPURA
84
82
81
91
92
94
93
97
98
103
102
101
118
119
121
138 3830 Gl/2004-11
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr 4
6
5
0
05
95 0
02
91
00
0
20 0
06
55
00
0
72 0
04
94 0
45
09
01
39 0
21
30
13 0
01
26
49 0
79 0
05
11 0
01
0
16
84 0
26
98 0
00
20 0
09
25
0
00
20 0
20
88 0
20
00
76
23
54 0
00
0
27
09
0
16
56 0
06
12
46
17
0
60 0
04
74 0
15
00
20 0
13
06 0
03
05
0
81
09
0
05
04
21
96 0
0
09
99 288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
PART 11 - SEC . 2 ( ii ) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
139 10. NAGAL PANDITPURA
140 (Contd... )
263
141
149
261
240
239
190
191
198
197
196
202
2135 11. BUCHAHEDA
2138
2137
2144
2145
2146
2149
2150
2151
2024
2023
2017
2016
2010 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr 4
5
6 0
11
52 0
47
06
0
13
42
00
20 0
0
04
38 0
15
69 0
09
54 0
40
32
69 0
21
12
81 0
08
45
37 0
26
0
05
38 0
10
55 0
71
02
0
53
19
0
24
21
00
40 0
0
13
74 0
01
89
76 0
16
0
10
98
00
20 50
0
04
84 0
37
41
0
05
67 0
46
18
0
25
00
01
0
62
1986 (G/ L Cart Track)
1963
1964
1966
1972
1969 101
10
0
99
47 0
12
13
0
40
64 0
10
76 0
02 [भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी. 8 , 2005 /पौष १ , 1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
289 State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
3-
2
1971- 11. BUCHAHEDA ( Contd ... )
1978 Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
0
15
95
16
93 0
01
45
1529 (G/LCart Track)
1914
1532 0
26
54 0
32
09
71 0
05
1532/3376
1531 0
50
00
0
01
62
1533( G /L Cart Track)
1536
1537
1564
1563
1562
1560
1561
1559
1557
1558
1556 0
13
25
45 0
00
0
15
38
07
79 0
46
17
0
0
00
40
62
11
00
20 0
0
11
54
40 0
00
11
68 0
36
01
0
1594 (G/L Cart Track)
1639
1643
1642
15
1641
1625
1656
1658
160 12. BALAWAS
158 01
157
161
162
163
78
00
0
46 0
12
62
12
0
28 0
25
0
34
53
75 0
01
σ
00
49
35
60 0
30 0
00
18
01
0
03 0
11
05 0
25
81 0
23
95 0
00
148(G/L Cart Track)
290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926.
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
[PART II-SEC . 2( ii)] State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
98 BALAWAS ( Contd ... )
12.
96
95
94
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6
93
16
0
52 0
16
25
11
0
0
11
39 0
02
00
86 (G/ L Cart Track)
68
69
1358 13. BADAWAS
1359
1360
1361
1355 0
07
26 0
08
95 0
03
53 0
06
63 0
09
00 0
02
52 0
36
14
04
06
1160/1484
1160
1172
1173
1171
1164
1168
1167
1166
1165 0
0
01
91 0
24
04
00
64 0
0
03
15
0
00
20 0
00
25 0
16
16
04
97 0
79 0
09
0
04
25
897 ( PWD Road)
994
992
991
990 0
26
54 0
23
94
22
32 0
0
08
01
0
64
00
813(G/ L Cart Track)
812 0
07
22
01
0
29
796 ( G / LCart Track)
711
710
714
715
03
0
04
20
57 0
97 0
14
20 0
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 2 ( ii) ]
291
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District : JAIPUR Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
716 13. BADAWAS ( Contd ... )
754
719
721
722
747
749
746
745
744
736
737 (G /LCartTrack)
113
110
111
112
146Min
}
146/15
147
145
155
156
161
190
189
188
192
199
195
198
197
1712 14. BASADI
1708 (G /L Cart Track)
1721 State: RAJASTHAN Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
34 0
03
03
09 0
14 0
10
25
12
0
66 0
08
07 0
08
07
10 0
0
07
23
70
17
0
74 0
15
41 0
27
00
0
88 0
01
69
07
0
56
72 0
08
01
21 0
12
0
60 0
01
36 0
11
75 0
01
56
15
0
24
14
0
60 0
37
13
0
01
90
41 0
11
12
0
94
16
11 0
0
20
00
0
72
08
63 0
11
0
26
56
00
79 0
47
64 0 292
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926 .
[PART II- SEC . 2 ( ii) ] Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
1
3
2
4
5
6
0
13
01
14. BASADI (Contd ... )
1723( G /L Cart Track)
1725
0
41
93
0
47
01
1642(G / L Cart Track)
1640
0
04
47
G
630
15. KHEDKI VIRBHAN
0
17
76
0
631
13
50
632
0
00
38
830
0
91 16. MOLAHEDA
08
0
831
40
06
832
0
62
09
836
0
11
95
0
30
821
22
0
20
00
839
820
0
02
00
0
01
62
860(G/L)
0
670
01
97
19
0
03
819
0
29
671
09
672
07
96
0
0
09
84
673
0
808/1017
81
05
16
0
03
806
0
69
05
805
0
07
84
760
0
91
761
08
0
43
16
762
0
01
00
767/1026
46
0
19
767
48
0
37
775(G /L Ahed)
18
0
31
772(G/L)
0
02
31-
465
17. SHEKHUPUR
0
12
32
466
43
0
07
467
01
48
468
0 293
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii ) ]
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District : JAIPUR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3 1
2
471 17. SHEKHUPUR ( Contd ... )
470
472
482
766
765
764
763
762
615
613
614
622
623
628
627
634
633
632
631
646
645
649 State : RAJASTHAN
Area Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr 4
5
6 0
16
09
52
13
0
0
00
20
42
01
0
93 0
16
02
95 0
0
13
05
71
16
0
11
0
07 0
33
21
20
00
0
35 0
05
06
13 0
0
02
29
27 0
06
0
00
20
72 0
13
0
03
97 0
05
37
01
30 0
64
08
0
05
14 0
88
07
0
01
42
656 (G /LCart Track)
661 0
01
16 0
05
03
660(G/L River)
662
663 0
03
43 0
10
29
89 0
03
664(G/L River)
665
666
669
670
698 18. BINJAHEDA
0
04
03
80 0
06
01
63
22
09
0
27 0
09 294
[ PART 11 - SEC . 2( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Area Are
Khasara No.
Hectare
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
3
4
2
1
5
6
0
08
35
697
18. BINJAHEDA ( Contd ... )
00
0
36
700( G/ L Cart Track)
20
00
701
0
20
00
0
696
63
0
00
694(G/L Cart Track)
0
07
92
692
00
20
0
685
0
45
09
684
00
20
0
680
69
10
0
681
00
20
675
0
09
61
674
0
00
20
672
09
79
673
0
0
69
12
658
47
0
07
660
01
0
08
656
13
05
649
0
07
20
0
650
87
0
12
647
0
10
08
646
09
36
0
639
20
0
00
640
20
00
637
Ở
35
0
08
638
77
0
10
629
00
44
0
626
67
15
0
628
69
01
0
620
11
07
0
621
42
03
0
619
0
00
58
607
85
0
07
606
00
79
0
602 295
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii) ]
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of theVillage
2
3 1
603 18. BINJAHEDA ( Contd ... )
591
593
585
583
584
569
568
567 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
5
6 4
0
08
17 0
17
74
01
92 0
10
64
93
04
0
95
03
0
05
92 0
02
69 0
0
08 61.
85
01
0
201(G/L Cart Track)
196
197
195
193
152
160
157
156
158
155
143
142
141
122
121
124
125
120
126
110 0
01
96
30 0
04
0
03
05
1
20 0
18
0
14
71
01
17 0
06
88 0
95
03
0
02
42 0
02
50
37 0
07
75 0
11
20 0
00
62
01
0
66 0
03
0
05
06
23 0
07
03
58
21 0
09
77 0
02
20
01
0
97 (G/L Cart Track)
81
83
86 3830 Gl/2004-12
0
09
48
16
58 0
21
15
0 296
[PART II-SEC . 2(ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No ..
Name of the Village
3
2
1
75 18. BINJAHEDA ( Contd ... )
76
69
67
35
36
38
39
1311 19. PANIYALA
1323
1329
1330
1331
1339
1334
1338
1347
1348
1501
1500
1499
1498
1496
1495
1494
1493
1491
1492
1643
1647
1648
1659
1657
1656
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
12
68 0
38
00
0
00
20 0
74 0
18
08
0
13 0
07
80
13
20 0
87
14
0
88
13
0
13
64
36
13
0
0
34
15
40
00
0
17
64 0
31 0
01
60
03
0
0
03
88
00
22 0
07
52 0
12
73 0
0
15
48
52 0
15
0
09
03 0
06
69
12
0
64
05
0
09
01
23 0
15
0
35 0
76
17
0
04
16
14
45 D
76
10
0
03
01
0
27
10
0 297
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005/ पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 2( ii) ]
Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
3
2
-1664 19. PANIYALA ( Contd ... )
1665
1666
Area
Are Sq.mtr. Hectare
6 4
5
86 0
10
57 0
16
70
00
0
0
00
76
1668(G/L Cart Track)
1673
2158
2157
2156
1674
2155
2154
2128
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2074
2075
2076
2089
2088
2081
2087
2086
2083
2025
2024
2023
1044 20. MORDA
1045
1042
1069
1073
04 0
12
0
79
00
02
0
58 0
05 1,59 0
00
20. 0
65
11
03
0
29
06
0
25 0
03
89
03
62 0
0
03
08
03
82 0
0
94
04
0
02
97
03
07 0
0
06
70
12
52 0
20 0
00
38 0
06
57 0
08
67 0
06
06
55 0
73
01
0
14
76 0
02
0
74 0
12
05
27 0
09
0
35
00
0
87
31
87 0
11 298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART 11- SEC . 2 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No
Are
Khasara No.
Hectare
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
1
2
6
3
5
4
72
1074
0
05
20. MORDA ( Contd ...)
1065
0
10
49
1063
22
63
1101
0
33
36
1109
0
11
49
20
1110
0
00
0
20
1108
00
01
1107
0
83
0
23
07
1106
0
02
1105
07
18
0
06
1111 (G/L)
32
0
04
1112
0
57
01
1113
0
02
21
1116 ( G /L Cart track)
86
0
05
1125
00
1117
0
08
0
78
11
1118
0
00
50
1124
93
1123
0
07
1122
15
0
04
64
1164
0
01
24
49
1165
0
0
09
56
1159
0
17
49
1158
79
0
20
1156
0
13
69
1155
43
02
1140 ( G /LCart track)
03
0
89
883
96
02
0
881
09
0
85
882
11
03
872
0
07
60
871
0
0
02
873
80
13
87
869
0 299
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौप 18,1926
[भाग II-खण्ड 2 (ii ) ]
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : KOTPUTLI
District : JAIPUR
Area Sr. No
Hectare Are
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
3
1
2
4
5
6
0
856
14
47 20. MORDA (Contd ... )
860
0
09
01
861
0
09
19
0
853
00
20
[No. R-31015/64/2004- O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2005
काः आ. 99. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाएँ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, 16 , कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास , गोपालपुरा बाईपास रोड़ , जयपुर 302018 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
अनुसूची
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
एयर वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
2
3
14
5
6 1
2183
25
20
0
1. जैनपुरबास
2182
08
0
10
0
10
80
2181
0
2123
06
82
0
04
34
2122
0
08
2121
76
56
0
04
2126
08
46
0
2120.
86
0
04
2119
58
0
01
2096 (स. रास्ता)
0
2038
20
16
2037
0
00
58
14
54
2044
0
30
2048
05
0
06
87
2047
03
67
0
2050
0
04
60
2052
2051
0
05
84
2055
0
09
70
0
68
04
1915
0
70
05
1914
50
02
1913
0
0
16
70
603
2. पहाडी
0
09
86
602
0
05
601
12
600
17
86
00
0
20
619
620
0
01
07
90
623
01
0
65
0
10
624
0
03
40
628
0
74
627
05
0
07
92
630
0
20
81
631 301
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
जिला : अलबर
तहसील : बहरोड़
सं.
गाँव का माम
खसरा सं.
3 1
2
2. पहाडी (जारी...)
569(स.रास्ता
515
512
514
513
499
510
500
509
502
501
483
481
410
409
408
407
406
387
388
365
363
364
282
281
275
271
272
267
199
198
200
201
197
195
194
155 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6 0
62
01
0
05
67 0
00
70 0
06
37 0
16
49 0
57
2.6
00
0
94 σ
06
89 0
02
11 0
06
04 0
03
46 0
07
42 0
07
34 0
03
58 0
00
20 0
09
38 0
06
62 0
05
40 0
03
65 0
06
62
09
22 0
10
15 0
47
00
0
08
84 0
00
34 0
23
42 0
00
22 0
10
58 0
09
58 0
06
15 0
01
60 0
02
61 0
00
32
06
78 Q
0
15
46 0
01
10 0
24
84 302
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
1
2
3
928 2. पहाडी (जारी ...)
930
929
943
941
942
940
934
936
935
81
79
77
78
39
46
40
41
42
43
45 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
6
5
4
0
04
68
01
0
03 0
73
13
00
20 0
05
67 0
00
92 0
01
06
0
75 0
14
0
00
32 0
06
24
80
00
0
00 0
08
28
00
34 0
06
04 0
05
06
65 0
66 0
00
20 0
00
00
20 0
00
20 0
02
52 0
01
37 0
44(स.रास्ता)
0
89
01
462(स. रास्ता)
3. मौसमपुर
02
79 0
461 (स. रास्ता)
460
459
458
467
468
469
471
473
474
531
523
524 104
0
01
10
02
86 0
06
48 0
83
02
0
07
29 0
20
00
0
44 0
01
60
12
0
24
03
0
24
03
0
07
0
56
00
20 0 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
303
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
522 3. मौसमपुर (जारी...)
518
517
515
514
508
509 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
4
5
6 0
06
84 0
68
04
0
49
05
0
03
78
03
96 0
*08
19 0
07
92 0
01
08
511 (स. रास्ता)
0
32
04
308(स.रास्ता)
1379
1378
1412
1429
1428
1432
1431
1430
1449
1448
1447
10 0
04
0
00
20 0
00
36 0
88
01
0
00
36 0
96
11
0
01
48 0
85
05
92
01
03
12 0
0
00
54
00
0
65
1433(स.भूमि)
0
00
42
1434(स.भूमि)
0
24
12
1375(स.नदी)
961 4. मोहम्मदपुर
960
959 0
40
14
61 0
11
0
14
01 0
02
84
959/3179 (स . चरागाह)
924
925
925/3106 0
00
81 0
05
92 0
02
55
01
33
958(स.चरागाह)
956
926
955
928
927 3830 GI /2004-13
0
00
22
23 0
04
00
0
20
00
20 0
0
00
20 304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
952 4. मोहम्मदपुर (जारी...)
953
1037
1038
1083
1082
1079
1077
1076
1064
1295
1063
1362 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
एयर
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर 4
5
6
02
74 0
04
91 0
64
08
0
44 0
10
34 0
11
56
07
0
23 0
07
0
05
73 0
04
50
56 0
07
0
01
89 0
63
09
0
23
13
72 0
04
1363(स.रास्ता)
1360
1387
1386
1385
1384
1407
1381 0
03
00 0
19
01
0
06
12
90 0
09
0
07
50
03
0
12 0
16
72 0
27
00
1३६० (स.भूमि)
1411 0
00
31 0
10
30
1885(स. चरागाह)
5. सरविलन्दपुरा
1878
1878/1978
1884
1883
1882
1880
1881
1026
1027
1025
1024
998 0
00
76 0
67
24
0
02
52 0
00
99 0
00
20
00
20 0
0
06
84 0
16
29 0
00
72 0
04
08
12
48 0
0
11
88 305 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर
खसरा सं.
एयर
4
6 2
5
3
1
10
0
08
997
5. सरविलन्दपुरा (जारी...)
10
37
0
996
971
0
56
25
15
970
34
FO
0
17
961
90
06
211
03 6. मुजरवास
96
0
10
212
20
0
00
213
215
0
00
54
0
09
22
214/663
00
214
0
94
221
02
011
0
00
50
222
223
07
47
0
0
12
24
224
14
225
0
31
42
226
0
13
00
227
0
89
0
01
26
147(स.रास्ता)
14
126
0
20
0
00
125
20
0
128
15
21
122
0
14
94
54
117
0
11
78
0
116
12
0
00
20
531
7. शहजादपुर बांगलिया
40
530
0
00
0
529
00
40
05
75
0
528
0
10
80
519
518
0
10
33
00
47
0
515
04
0
01
516
62
08
0
517
0
09
81
501
0
08
10
500 306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़द्द
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
504 7. शहजादपुर बांगलिया (जारी ...)
499
493
485
492
486
468
460/690
460
447
448
450
419
416
418
417
408
412
411
410
409
395
364
346
349
347
348
323
324
325
322
314
315
313
307
293
292 राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
6
5
02
60 0
0
00
20 0
06
94 0
00
20 0
10
80 0
07
31 0
06
88 0
01
44
56 0
16
94
07
0
00
88 0
92
07
0
02
90 0
04
40
00
0
48 0
05
69 0
05
00
92 0
01
0
75
02
0
04
54 0
00
30 0
62
12
07
38
07
0
20 0
03
36 0
02
97 0
04
94 0
00
88 0
56
08
0
07
20 0
00
20
47 0
02
0
04
55 0
04
14 0
72
12
0
07
25 0
05
04 307
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
269 शहजादपुर नांगलिया (जारी...)
7.
270
262
255
256
260
258
247
248
246
245
236
40(स.रास्ता)
39
27
26
22
23
14
15
8 8. बर्डोद
2038(स . रास्ता)
1382
1383
1400
1399
1398
1404
1397
1409
1410
1430
1429
1428
1439
1440 राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर
4
6
5
0
02-
15
76
08
20 0
00
0
03
15
0
17
05
0
44
08
20
00
0
20
00
0
00
40 0
03
11
04 0
09
0
00
20 0
02
70 0
04
77
07
56 6
0
06
48 0
10
68
00
30 0
01
62 0
11
52 0
70
20
0
03
42 0
10
08
04 0
14
07
0
92 0
30
1.1
03
0
84
01
08 0
04 0
17
82 0
06
0
13
21
0
02
19 0
21
00
0
07
20 0
21
15
0
68
13 308
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
जिला : अलवर
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
गाँव का नाम
3
4
6 1
5
2
0
12
06
1443
8. बडोद (जारी ...)
0
10
98
1444
00
0
20
1453
0
04
11
1456
00
0
48
1457
0
09
09
1455
13
0
86
1514
05
16
11
1515
22
0
14
1527
0
87
1530
12
12
96
0
1547
0
42
12
1548
0
14
31
1549
97
05
1564
0-
0
02
70
1567
0
36
1566
15
0
85
14
1588
0
00
52
1615
09
0
38
1616
0
09
72
1613
0
10
98
1612
0
35
1609
10
0
08
1648
28
0
64
08
1649
0
11
34
1661
09
63
1658
0
0
02
87
1656
1657
0
33
13
0
01
44
997 (स. रास्ता)
00
0
20
971/5014
40
17
971
0
01
32
972
0
0
04
32
964(पी.डब्ल्यू, डी. सड़क)
01
12
801
0
0
12
29
800
06
75
804
0
0
10
53
803 309
भारत का राजपत्रं : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 ,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
2
1
3
805 8.. बडोद (जारी...)
815
814
813
808
809
810
738
737
736
735
728(स.रास्ता)
613
614
615
608
607
604
603
599
598
597
539
538
536
542
543
544
5.35
534
513(स. रास्ता)
503
504
505
498
496
45.8(स.रास्ता) राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर
4
5
6
00
20
15
0
27 0
13
98 0
00
24 0
52
03
0
00
20 0
13
76 0
15
12 0,
11
61 0
03
78 ό
22
86 0
01
53 0
00
30
20
00
0
16
71 0
23
85 0
13
68 0
13
14 0
11
07 0
04
48 0
05
94 0
56
00
0
06
12 0
07
92 0
11
22 0
00
20
01
24 0
00
28 0
09
04 0
06
48 0
44
01
0
10
53 0
10
26 0
06
66 0
09
54 0
10
44 0
01
62 310
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गाँव का नाम
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 2
3
4
1
6
5
272
0
12
78 8. बोंद (जारी... )
273
0
04
14
274
0
01
97
222
03
30
0
281
0
14
49
282
0
13
41
15
84
283
01
0
286
04
64
285
0
05
0
292
00
20
0
26
96
301
0
300
10
80
0
299
12
96
128
0
03
15
0
78
129
21
0
00
20
130
0
71
137
15
0
03
19
133
134
17
28
00
0
99
96(स.रास्ता)
0
60
12
89
0
20
61
04
0
70
72
03
69
0
15
60
0
68
12
78
0
90
64
09
9. बांटखानी
76
0
01
340 (स.भूमि)
96
284
0
03
00
70
0
285 (स.भूमि)
00
24
0
286
0
01
80
287 (स.भूमि)
339
0
03
69
0
79
338
20
0
360
19
98
350
0
00
20 10 311
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पाष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
3 1
2
351 9. बांटखानी (जारी...)
359 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
5
6 0
14
60 0
00
20 0
02
26
356(स.भूमि)
355 0
01
89 0
62
10
512(स. चरागाह)
511
517
518
520
519
523
530
527
526
525
525/866 0
23
40 0
12
42 0
00
20 0
04
42 0
05
94 0
61
02
05
0
58
04
23 0
06
75 0
05
48 0
03
28 0
16
02
491 (स.रास्ता)
547
547/867
548
550
558
559
560
557
561
556
562
563
383 10. कोलीलाराबड
384
385
387
388 0
01
94 0
06
54 0
06
48 0
45
09
0
05
19 0
03
40 0
09
91 0
00
20
00
20 0
00
35 0
76
12
0
02
14 0
02
08 0
12
60 0
10
92
00
0
20 0
05
00 0
01
08
389(स. रास्ता)
390 3830 Gl/2004-14
0
07
64 312
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
अलवर
जिला :
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
2
3 1
391 कोलीलाराबह (जारी...)
1.0 .
405
403
404(स.भूमि)
479(स.चरागाह)
ख.सं. 479 और 483 के बीच में
485(स.भूमि)
490(स.भूमि)
483
491 (स.भूमि)
482
492(स.भूमि)
489(स.भूमि)
502(स.भूमि)
488
501
503
505
504(स.भूमि)
511(स.चरागाह)
$ 58
469
470
466
465
456
461
460
459
458
445
446
443
447
442
434 1041
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
0
20
00
0
31
00
01
52 0
05
78 0
0
27
72 0
02
20 0
20
00
01
40 0
00 0
06
0
03
72
00
0
20 0
01
20 0
96
03
0
02
30 0
96
01
0
00
20 0
07
64 0
07
60 0
02
88 0
40
00
08
0
37
00 0
09
0
09
40 0
00
20 0
01
30 0
01
99 0
03
69
52 0
03
0
04
68 0
07
72 0
02
16 0
04
96
00
44 0
0
04
19 0
10
06
0
21
82 313 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6
3
2
1
00
48
0
435
कोलीलाराबड (जारी... )
10.
11. कोलीलाजोमा
00
20
635
05
0
636
00
56
637
07
0
0
17
64
643
00
0
20
647
05
48
646
0
04
0
65
650
28
0
13
651
02
66
0
687
23
688
0
11
20
00
689
0
05
84
714
0
07.
20
0
729
730
07
98
28
02
727
0
0
10
44
726
20
779
0
05
780
0
36
05
0
33
01
778(स. रास्ता)
01
0
80
751
04
755
0
51
05
06
754
0
00
753
0
68
05
748
0
84
0
746
77
06
0
747
00
50
11
742
06
80
0
03
741
0
05
04
737
02
88
738
0
10
19
0
739
0
00
90
736(स. रास्ता)
05
454
0
02
00
0
01
421
0
10
26
453 314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
4
5
6 1
2
3
0
422
15
23 11. कोलीलाजोगा (जारी...)
16
50
0
356
06
0
20
130
76
0
01
131
02
0
59
137
62
0
11
138
34
15
0
139
02
0
30
140
68
0
13
142
75
0
13
143
36
0
09
147
0
20
146
00
93
0
07
148
15
81
0
149
39
0
06
168
20
0
07
169
12
0
06
170
0
60
03
171
0
62
11
188
06
93
0
189
01
0
32
185
05
0
66
184
0
06
84
183
07
0
92
438
12. माजराकाठ
0
04
05
437
0
56
03
436
0
05
18
435
08
0
01
434(स.रास्ता)
72
18
0
504
00
0
20
433
0
20
88
432
11
52
0
430
0
36
09
429/767
11
429
88
09
40
14
0
428
0
10
88
427(स.चरागाह)
0
64
44
388(स.चरागाह)
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
[ भाल -खण्ड 3(ii) ]
315
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
क्रम स.
3
2
1
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
0
20
00
386(स.चारागाह)
12. माजराकाठ (जारी...)
44 0
46
387/784(स. चारागाह)
0
47
13
377(स.भूमि)
376
22 0
02
,387(स.भूमि)
348(स.भूमि)
348/794
348/796
365
349 0
87
53
}
09
0
00 0
18
65 0
19
25
347(स.बरड़ा)
98 13. कालीपहाडी
99
100
101
102
105
09
72 0
09
04
05
0
04
14 0
04
86
70 0
11
08 0
10
0
66
01
276(स.चारागाह)
106
111
108
110
109
82
81
74
73 0
05
04
0
80
00
66 0
03
0
00
42
35 0
03
03
07 0
0
04
53
69 0
01
0
20
00
66 0
06
112(स. नाला)
117
118
20 0
00
0
03
36 0
01
48
132(स. नाला)
119
122
121
123
125 0
17
06
00 0
09
0
00
20 0
07
92
08
46 0 316
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
हेक्टेयर
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
एयर वर्ग मीटर
5
6 1
2
4
3
0
09
90
126
13. कालीपहाडी (जारी...)
0
40
127
05
0
06
75
128
0
72
00
129
0
09
56
260
0
98
01
259
0
13
64
261
88
262
0
03
0
00
20
254
0
66
253
09
06
266
0
12
11
0
34
251
00
0
20
250
0
40
14
249
02
0
27
279(स.बहड़)
02
40
0
248(स.चरागाह)
05
0
40
232
22
68
231 (स.नाला)
00
02
0
230
96
00
220
0
00
99
0
223(स.भूमि)
0
84
221
15
20
00
0
219
0
01
89
201 (स.रास्ता)
04
05
0
180
0
64
00
181
64
0
03
182
04
32
0
183
04
14
0
184
04
0
68
185
07
02
186
00
0
20
187
0
03
195
24
0
18
36
188
0
22
189
21
47
190
0
00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
317
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
14. जनकसिंहपुरा
332(स. रास्ता)
330/346
331
331/359
330
78 15. फौलादपुर
77
75
74
88
89
90
70(स.रास्ता)
30
31
32
35
34
25(स.यस्ता)
40
10
11
12
13
13/2097 (स.भूमि)
14/2096 (स.भूमि)
14
718(स.भूमि)
904 16. शाहजहाँपुर
906
911
912
916
917
921
922 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
5
6 4
02
16 0
0
08
37 0
57
08
0
12
96 0
00
96 0
08
28 0
23
40 0
37
05
0
00
95
94 0
18
00
75 0
87
09
44 0
01
0
28
08
0
08
01
67 0
00
56 0
12
0
10
62 0
01
26 0
00
20 0
02
42
14
0
65 0
01
29
00
OF
20 0
09
08 0
07
47
19
0
98 0
06
81 0
08
64
63 0
01
0
00
20 0
20
00
14
78 0
0
14
94
15
0
48 0
60
03 318
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
जिला : अलवर
राज्य: राजस्थान
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं .
क्रम स.
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
1
2
3
6
920
0
14
62 16. शाहजहाँपुर (जारी ... )
0
928
03
06
866
0
10
08
0
864
09
99
0
20
865
00
0
12
10
970
0
01
37
973(स.रास्ता)
0
20
989
25
0
04
988
93
00
1001
0
75
0
09
94
987
17
0
03
1002
1005
0
81
16
1007
0
05
73
1006
0
03
15
0
1008
15
72
0
1009
00
57
ख.सं. 1009 और
0
02
16
782 के बीच में
0
01
60
781
00
20
780
0
0
15
782
43
0
66
00
776
0
777
11
85
18
774
0
09
10
17
773
0
03
772
0
12
771
00
0
43
0
42
03
750(स. रास्ता)
659
0
00
31
22
667
0
15
18
679
0
09
677
0
01
59
0
676
09
21
675
00
0
20
684
0
12
95
685
0
05
57
0
40
01
688
0
686
00
46 319
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
जिला : अलवर तहसील : बहरोड़
खसरा सं.
क्रम स.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
687 शाहजहाँपुर (जारी... )
16.
690
691
707
706 .
701
701/1
}
705
702
703
536(स.रास्ता)
498
497
495
494
491
492
460
464
463
461
462
441(स. नदी)
403
402
404
405
398
397
396
394
395
1228
1229
390 (पी. डब्ल्यूडी .सड़क)
391 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
3830 Gl/2004-15
राज्यः राजस्यान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीट
एयर
4
6
5
0
11
05
0
10
80
33 0
04
0
10
91
08
44 0
0
02
52
00
20 0
13 0
13
01
03
01
0
44 0
14
33 0
12
31 0
07
38 0
11
09
0
42
03
10 0
08
0
16
03
0
06
20 0
40
14
0
20
00
0
19
17
10
0
89
90 0
09
12 0
06
0
00
20
12
0
96
60
03
0
12 0
06
66
06
0
20
00
0
49
13
0
82
08
0
23
04
0
52 0
02
88 0
02 320
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
क्रम स.
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
3
4
2
5
6 1
0
10
02
392 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
शाहजहाँपुर (जारी...)
16.
0
02
88
387
8
42
1304
01
08
0
21
1305
0
07
92
1306
0
00
20
1307
0
42
1317
05
22
0
05
1316
00
34
0
1318
0
16
65
1315
0
00
20
1314
0
01
53
1321 (स.रास्ता) 1293 (स.यस्ता) }
10
06
0
1323
0
01
48
1322
85
0
15
1324
59
0
02
1334(स. रास्ता)
0
10
90
1342
0
05
75
1341
0
01
55
1338
72
0
01
1340
0
10
57
1339
11
0
1337
52
0
1336
08
63
0
32
13
1385
10
1391
58
0
50
1390
0
00
0
14
13
1394
61
1397
0
12
0
1398
01
03
0
1396
02
56
24
0
1400
15
0
1403
11
52
0
05
59
1405
47
0
1406
04
00
1404
0
76
17
01
0
1407
10 321 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
6
3
5
1
2
0
50
1410
13
16. शाहजहाँपुर (जारी...)
1411
13
0
51
1422
05
0
21
1421
34
09
0
44
01
0
1415 (स.रास्ता)
0
00
58
1419
1420
30
0
12
03
78
1500 (स. रास्ता)
07
07
1589
0
26
1591
0
11
0
17
1611
77
02
0
73
1609
11
49
1612
0
0
02
1613
53
16
1614
0
68
1618
0
07
71
1776
0
01
15 17. जोबायचाखुर्द
1777
0
11
99
0
40
1778
02
742
0
03
60
741
20
0
00
738
0
14
88
739
0
72
11
\
736
03
0
04
00
94
735
0
32
734
0
13
46
732
0
14
731
0
24
02
0
04
706
68
708
0
04
32
710
0
03
30
0
02
709
51
56
711
0
16
04
0
50
712
697
0
07
60
0
696
57
08
0
03
60
695 322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
हेक्टेयर
गाँव का नाम
एयर वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं .
4
5
6
3
1
2
0
04
694
68 17. जोनायचाखुर्द (जारी ...)
0
10
02
658
0
657
08
95
0
04
28
638
0
00
20
636
0
01
13
637(स.भूमि)
66
13
0
629
86
0
01
630
26
0
01
628(स .रास्ता)
00
20
0
625(स.भूमि)
0
04
61
626
0
626/1856
01
80
07
622
02
621
0
37
04
0
620
02
20
0
05
59
620/1849
0
06
12
619
0
00
20
618
0
05
76
1755
18. गूगलकोटा
0
07
74
1752
10
1753
0
98
0
17
1750
64
0
12
96
1713
0
20
00
1714
0
80
1708
08
00
20
1709
1686
0
03
96
1687
60
0
12
00
0
1685
20
06
48
1679
0
00
42
0
1688
0
52
10
1669
0
09
97
1670
20
00
1671
0
0
1666
06
74
00
40
1655
0 323 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
जिला : अलवर
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
2
5
4
3
6 1
1656
0
07
92 18. गूगलकोटा (जारी... )
0
1.628
08
58
1627
0
12
06
1625
05
40
0
1624
0
68
04
02
11
1600 (स. रास्ता)
0
452/2234
00
20
452
0
15
80
0
451
09
36
450
0
05
76
431/2247
0
00
55
431
0
00
20
0
06
48
393(स.रास्ता)
0
00
90
384(स.चरागाह)
392
0
17
65
0
02
65
391
379
0
12
04
0
00
20
378
380
00
20
375
0
14
54
0
374
17
28
0
479
00
20
480
0
10
44
483
0
11
72
484
0
00
20
490
0
02
52
0
489
28
08
494
0
05
40
495
0
03
06
497
0
08
31
0
20
00
496(स.कुओं)
0
38
501
00
06
17
500 (स.कुओं)
499
0
00
70
508
0
28
08,
0
509
05
37
0
20
554
00 324
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
4
5
6 1
3
2
00
550
0
09
18. गूगलकोटा (जारी...)
0
14
00
549
0
07
34
529
24
544
0
06
10
95
543
06
44
0
541
0
05
29
540(स.भूमि)
0
01
68
607
0
86
00
539(स.भूमि)
0
00
48
538
17
74
0
609
76
14
1675
19. कांकर
07
04
0
1676
03
76
0
1677
00
0
18
1671
47
0
07
1670
0
70
05
1669
0
10
80
1668
20
0
00
1667
0
00
20
1630
07
42
0
1631
02
75
0
1666
0
01
43
1632
83
0
08
1650
03
74
0
1649
08
41
0
1648
20
0
00
1647
07
0
38
1646
00
20
0
1636
65
07
0
1638
01
34
0
1615(स. रास्ता)
82
13
0
1608
01
48
0
1607
49
02
0
1609
0
20
00
1610
35
0
13
1602 325
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
राज्य: राजस्थान
जिला : अलवर
तहसील : बहरोड़
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं .
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर गाँव का नाम
क्रम स.
6
4
5
3
2
1
17
55
0
1601
19. कांकर (जारी...)
13
68
0
1598
[फा. सं. आर -31015/73/2004 - ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 6th January, 2005
S. O. 99. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the rightof user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority, Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , 16 Krishana Vihar , Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye pass Road, Jaipur- 302018 ( Rajasthan).
326
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : BEHROR
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
2183 1. JAINPURBAS
2182
2181
2123
2122
2121
2126
2120
2119
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
5
6 4
20
25
0
0
10
08 0
10
80
06
82 Q
34 0
04
76
08
0
56 0
04
0
46
08
0
86
04
01
58 0
2096 (G/L Cart Track)
2038
2037
2044
2048
2047
2050
2052
2051
2055
1915
1914
1913
603 2. PAHADI
602
601
600
619
620
623
624
628
627
630
631
16
20
0
00
58 0
0
54
14
05
30 0
06
87 0
03
0
67
60
04
0
84
05
0
0
70
09
04
68 0
70 0
05
0
02
50
70
16
0
86 0
09
12
05 0
86 0
17
20
00
0
01
07 0
01
90 0
65
10
0
0
40
03
74
05
0
0
07
92 0
81
20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
327
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
District : ALWAR Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3 2. PAHADI ( Contd ... )
569(G/L Cart Track)
515
512
514
513
499
510
500
509
502
501
483
481
410
409
408
407
406
387
388
365
363
364
282
281
275
271
272
267
199
198
200
201
197
195
194
155 3830Gl/2004-16
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Sq.mtr. Hectare Are
4
6
5
62 0
01
67 0
05
0
00
70 0
37
06
0
16
49 0
26
57 0
00
94 0
06
89 0
02
11 0
06
04 0
46
03
0
07
42
34 0
07
0
58
03
0
00
20 0
38
09
0
62
06
0
40
05
03
65 0
0
62
06
22 0
09
10
15 0
00
47 0
0
84
08
0
00
34
42 0
23
0
00
22 0
10
58 0
58
09
0
06
15 0
60
01
61 0
02
32 0
00
06
78 0
15
46 0
10
01
0
24
84 0 328
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
District : ALWAR Sr. No
Khasara No. Nameof the Village
1
2
3
928 2. PAHADI ( Contd ...)
930
929
943
941
942
940
934
936
935
81
79
77
78
39
46
40
41
42
43
45
44 (G/L CartTrack) 3. MAUSAMPUR
462(G/ L Cart Track)
461(G/L CartTrack)
460
459
458
467
468
469
471
473
474
531
523
524
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
68 0
04
03
01
0
0
13
73 0
00
20
67 0
05
0
00
92 0
06
01 0
14
75 0
00
32
24 0
06
0
00
80
00 0
08
28 0
00
34 0
06
0
05
04 0
06
65
66 0
00
00
20
00
20 0
0
20
00
0
02
52 0
01
37 0
01
89 0
02
79
01
10 0
86 0
02
0
06
48
83 0
02
0
07
29
20
00
0
44
01
60 0
12
24 0
03
24
03
0
56 0
07
00
20 0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
329 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Area
Sr. No
Hectare
Khasara No.
Are Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
3
6 1
4
5
2
0
84
522
06
3. MAUSAMPUR ( Contd ... )
518
0
04
68
49
517
0
05
515
0
03
78
0
514
03
96
0
508
08
19
07
509
0
92
0
01
08
511( G/L Cart Track)
0
04
32
308(G/L Cart Track)
0
04
1379
10
1378
0
00
20
00
1412
0
36
1429
0
01
88
1428
0
00
36
0
1432
96
11
1431
0
01
48
1430
0
05
85
1449
0
01
92
0
1448
03
12
0
00
1447
54
0
00
65
1433(G/L)
00
0
42
1434(G/L)
0
24
12
1375 (G/ L River)
40
0
14
961
4. MOHAMMADPUR
0
960
11
61
959
0
14
01
0
02
84
959/3179(G/L Pasture)
0
00
81
924
0
925
05
92
0
02
55
925/3106
0
01
33
958(G / L Pasture)
00
0
956
22
0
926
04
23
0
00
20
955
20
0
928
00
20
927
0
00 330
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :
JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : BEHROR
District : ALWAR
Area
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
4
2
3
5
6 1
74
0
02
952
4. MOHAMMADPUR ( Contd ... )
91
953
0
04
0
64
1037
08
44
1038
0
10
1083
0
11
34
1082
07
56
0
23
1079
0
07
73
1077
05
0
0
50
1076
04
1064
07
56
0
0
01
89
1295
0
63
1063
09
1362
0
13
23
0
72
04
1363(G/L Cart Track)
00
0
03
1360
0
01
1387
19
0
06
12
1386
90
0
09
1385
0
07
50
1384
1407
0
03
12
0
16
72
1381
0
00
27
1380(G/L)
00
31
0
1411
0
30
10 5. SARVILANDPURA
1885 (G /L Pasture)
1878
0
00
76
24
0
67
1878/1978
0
52
1884
02
1883
0
00
99
0
00
20
1882
0
20
1880
00
06
0
1881
84
0
16
1026
29
00
72
1027
0
1025
04
0
08
0
1024
12
48
0
11
998
88 331 [ भाँग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
State : RAJASTHAN
District: ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Area
Are
Hectare
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Sr. No
Name of the Village
5
6
3
4
2
1
10
08
0
997
5. SARVILANDPURA ( Contd ...)
10
37
996
56
0
25
971
15
34
0
970
17
0
90
961
03
211
0
06
6. GUJARWAS
96
212
0
10
0
20
00
213
54
215
0
00
22
0
214/663
09
0
214
00
94
11
221
0
02
50
222
0
00
47
223
07
0
224
0
24
12
31
225
0
14
42
13
226
0
00
89
227
0
01
26
0
147 (G/L Cart Track)
0
20
126
14
00
20
125
0
21
15
0
128
94
0
14
122
11
117
0
54
0
12
78
116
0
20
531
00
7. SHAHAJADPUR NANGALIYA
00
40
530
Q
00
40
0
529
0
05
75
528
0
10
80
519
33
0
10
518
00
47
515
0
0
01
04
516
62
517
0
08
81
0
09
501
08
0
10
500 332
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8, 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
State: RAJASTHAN Tehsil : BEHROR
District: ALWAR
Area
Hectare Are
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
6
4
1
2
3
5
0
02
60
504
20
0
00
499
7 . SHAHAJADPUR NANGALIYA (Contd...)
0
06
94
493
20
0
00
485
10
80
0
492
07
0
31
486
88
06
468
44
01
0
460/690
56
460
0
16
447
07
0
94
0
00
88
448
0
07
92
450
02
90
0
419
0
40
416
04
00
418
0
48
417
05
69
0
0
05
00
408
412
0
01
92
411
02
75
0
410
04
54
0
30
409
00
12
62
395
0
38
364
0
07
0
20
346
07
36
03
349
0
0
02
97
347
94
348
0
04
323
0
00
88
56
0
324
08
0
20
325
07
322
00
20
0
47
0
02
314
55
315
0
04
ة
04
14
313
72
12
307
0
0
07
25
293
292
05
04
0 333
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
District : ALWAR Tehsil : BEHROR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3 1
2
269 7. SHAHAJADPUR NANGALIYA
270 (Contd...)
262
255
256
260
258
247
248
246
245
236
40(G/L CartTrack)
39
27
26
22
23
14
15
8 8. BARDOD
2038(G /L Cart Track)
1382
1383
1400
1399
1398
1404
1397
1409
1410
1430
1429
1428
1439
1440
= State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
5
4
6 0
02
15 0
08
76 0
20
00
15
03 0
0
05
17
44 0
08
0
00
20 0
00
20
00
40 0
0
03 11 0
0904
20 0
00
70
02
0
77
04
0
07
56 0
06
48
10
0
68 0
00
30 0
01
62 0
52
11
0
70
20
0
03
42 0
10
08 0
14
04 0
07
92
11
30
03
0
84 0
01
08 0
17
04 0
06
82
13
21
0
0
02
19
00
0
21 0
07
20 0
15
21
13
0
68 334
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii )] =
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3
2
1
1443 8. BARDOD ( Contd ... )
1444
1453
1456
1457
1455
1514
1515
1527
1530
1547
1548
1549
1564
1567
1566
1588
1615
1616
1613
1612
1609
1648
1649
1661
1658
1656
1657
997(G /L Cart Track)
971/5014
971
972
964(P.W.D. Road)
801
800
804
803
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
0
12
06
10
0
98 0
00
20 0
04
11
0
48
00
09
09 0
13
86 0
11
16
0
22 0
14
87 0
12
0
12
96
42 0
12
31 0
14
97 0
05
0
02
70
36 0
15
85 0
14
0
52
00
38
09
72
09
0
10
98 0
10
35 0
28 0
08
0
08
64
11
34 0
63 0
09
87
02
0
33 0
13
44 0
01
20
00
0
17
40 0
01
32 0
32
04
01
0
12
12
29 0
75 0
06
10
0
53 335
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
State: RAJASTHAN
District: ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3 1
2
805 8. BARDOD (Contd...)
815
814
813
808
809
810
738
737
736
735
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
5
6 4
20 0
00
27 0
15
13
0
98 0
00
24
03
0
52
00
20 0
76
13
0
15
12 0
0
11 161
78 0
03
0
22
86
53
01
0
728(G/L Cart Track)
613
614
615
608
607
604
603
599
598
597
539
538
536
542
543
544
535
534
30
00
00
20 0
16
71 0
85
23
0
13
68 0
0
13
14
07 0
11
48 0
04
0
05
94 0
00
56
12 0
06
92
07
0
22 0
11
20
00
0
01
24 0
00
28 0
04
09
0
48
06
0
01
44 0
513(G/L Cart Track)
503
504
505
498
496
10
53 0
0
10
26
66 0
06
54 0
09
44
10
0
0
01
62
458(G/L Cart Track)
3830 GI/2004-17 330
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
272 8. BARDOD ( Contd ... )
273
274
222
281
282
283
286
285
292
301
300
299
128
129
130
137
133
134
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
5
6 0
12
78
14
0
04
97
01
0
03
0
30
14
0
49
13
0
41 0
15
84
04
0
01 0
05
64 0
20
00
0
96
26
10
0
80 0
96
12
0
03
15 0
21
78 0
20
00
0
15
71
03
19 ρ
0
17
28
00
0
99
96(G/L Cart Track)
60
61
72
69
68
64 9. ΒΑΝΤΚHANI
12
0
89 0
20
04
0
03
70 0
60
15
0
12
78 0
09
90 0
76
01
340(G/L)
284
03
96 0
0
00
70
285(G/L)
286
24 0
00
01
80
287(G/L)
339
338
360
350 0
03
69 0
20
79
98 0
19
20 0
00 337 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
State : RAJASTHAN
District: ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Area
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Hectare Are Sq.mtr Nameof the Village
6 1
3
4
5
2
0
60
14
351
9. BANTKHANI ( Contd ...)
0
20
00
359
26
0
02
356(G/L)
0
01
89
355
62
10
0
512(G/L Pasture)
0
40
511
23
42
0
12
517
20
0
518
00
42
0
520
04
0
05
94
519
61
523
0
02
0
530
05
58
527
23
04
0
0
75
526
06
0
05
525
48
525/866
28
0
03
02
16
0
491(G/L Cart Track)
0
01
547
94
547/867
0
06
54
548
0
06
48
550
45
0
09
0
05
19
558
0
40
559
03
0
09
91
560
00
0
20
557
00
20
561
0
00
35
0
556
0
12
76
562
14
02
563
0
02
08
0
383
10. KOLILARABAD
60
12
384
0
92
10
0
385
0
00
20
387
00
388
0
05
0
01
08
389(G/L Cart Track)
64
07
390
0 338
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18. 1926
[ PART 11-SC. 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : BEHROR
District : ALWAR
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Sr. No
Are
Hectare
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
4
2
3
5
6 1
20
00
391
0
10. KOLILARABAD ( Contd ... )
0
00
31
405
0
52
403
01
05
0
78
404(G/L)
72
27
479(G/L Pasture)
0
02
20
In Bet Svy No 479 & 483
0
00
20
485(G/L)
0
01
40
490(G/L)
0
06
00
483
0
03
72
491(G/L)
20
00
0
482
0
20
01
492(G/L)
0
03
96
489(G/L)
02
0
30
502(G/L)
01
488
0
96
501
0
00
20
07
503
0
64
60
505
0
07
0
02
88
504(G/L)
00
40
0
511 (G /L Pasture)
37
0
468
08
0
09
00
469
0
09
40
470
466
0
00
20
30
465
0
01
0
456
01
99
461
0
03
69
0
03
52
460
68
04
459
0
07
72
0
458
0
16
02
445
0
96
446
04
0
443
00
44
447
0
04
19
06
10
442
0
82
434
0
21 339
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3
2
1
435 KOLILARABAD (Contd ... )
10.
635 KOLILAJOGA
11.
636
637
643
647
646
650
651
687
688
689
714
729
730
727
726
779
780
Area
Sq.mtr. Hectare Are
5
6 4
48 0
00
00
20 0
00 0
05
0
07
56
17
64 0
0
20
00
0
05
48 0
65
04
13
28 0
0
66
02
23 0
11
00
20 0
0
84
05
0
20
07
0
07
98 0
02
28 0
10
44
20 0
05
0
36
05
0
33
01
778(G/L Cart Track)
751
755
754
753
748
746
747
742
741
737
738
739 0
01
80
04
51 0
0
06
05 0
00
68
84 0
05
77 0
06
0
50
00
06 0
11
0
03
80
04 0
05
0
88
02
0
10
19
00
0
90
736(G/L Cart Track)
454
421
453 0
02
05 0
01
00
26 0
10 340
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Area
Sr. No
Hectare
Khasara No.
Are Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
3
4
5
6 2
1
422
0
15
23 11. KOLILAJOGA ( Contd ... )
356
0
16
50
130
0
20
06
131
0
01
76
137
0
02
59
138
0
62
11
139
0
15
34
0
02
30
140
0
142
13
68
0
75
143
13
0
36
147
09
0
00
20
146
0
07
93
148
0
15
81
149
168
0
06
39
0
07
20
169
12
170
0
06
03
171
0
60
62
0
11
188
06
93
189
0
32
0
01
185
66
0
05
184
0
183
06
84
07
438
0
92 12. MAJRAKATH
437
0
05
04
0
56
436
03
0
18
435
05
0
01
08
434(G/L CartTrack)
0
72
504
18
0
00
20
433
432
20
88
0
52
11
430
0
36
429/767
09
0
11
88
429
40
428
0
14
10
0
88
427( G /L Pasture)
0
64
44
388(G /L Pasture)
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
341
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
District : ALWAR Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
386(G/L Pasture) 12. MAJRAKATH ( Contd ... )
387/784 (G/L Pasture)
377(G/L)
376
387(G/L)
348(G/L)
348/794
348/796
365
349
347(G/L Barda) 13. KALIPAHADI
98
99
100
101
102
105
276(G /L Pasture)
106
111
108
110
109
82
81
74
73
112(G/L Nala)
117
118
132(G/L Nala)
119
122
121
123
125 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
0
00
20
46
0
44 0
13
47 0
02
22 0
87
53
09
0
00 0
18
65.
25
19
72 0
09
0
05
04 0
04
14 0
04
86 0
11
70 0
10
08 0
01
66 0
04
05 0
00
80 0
66
03
0
00
42 0
03
35
03
07 0
04
53 0
01
69 0
00
20
66 0
06
0
00
20
03
0
36 0
01
48 0
17
06 0
09
00 0
00
20 0
07
92
46 0
08 342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3
2
1
126 13. KALIPAHADI ( Contd ... )
127
128
129
260
259
261
262
254
253
266
251
250
249
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
90
09
0
05
40 0
06
75
72 0
00
0
09
56 0
01
98 0
64
13
0
03
88
20 0
00
0
66
09
0
06
12
34 0
11
0
00
20 0
40
14
0
02
27
279(G/L Behad)
0
02
40
248(G/L Pasture)
232 0
40
05
22
0
68
231(G/L Nala)
230
220 0
02
00
00
0
96
00
0
99
223(G/L)
221
219
15
0
84 0
00
20 0
01
89
201(G /L Cart Track)
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
195
188
189
190 0
04
05
00
64 0
03
0
64
32 0
04
14
04
0
04
0
68
07
02 0
0
00
20
24 0
03
36 0
18
22
21 0
47
00
0 343
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Tehsil : BEHROR
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Nameof the Village
1
2
3 14. JANAKSINGHPURA
332(G/L Cart Track)
330/346
331
331/359
330
78 15. FAULADPUR
77
75
74
88
89
90
70(G/L Cart Track)
30
31
32
35
34
25(G/L Cart Track)
40
10
11
12
13
13/2097( G/L)
14/2096(G/L)
14
718(G/L)
904 16. SHAHJAHANPUR
906
911
912
916
917
921
922 3830 GI/2004-18
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
02
16 0
0
08
37 0
57
08
0
12
96
96
00
0
28
08
0
23
0
40
05
37 0
0
00
95 0
18
94 0
75
00
0
09
87 0
01
44
28 0
08
01 0
08
0
00
67
12
56 0
10
0
62 0
01
26 0
00
20
02
42 0
0
14
65
01
0
29. 0
20
00
0
09
08
47 0
07
0
19
98 0
06
81 0
64
08
0
01
63 0
20
00
0
00
20
78 0
14
0
14
94 0
15
48 0
60
03 344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18. 1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
920 16. SHAHJAHANPUR ( Contd... )
928
866
864
865
970
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
0
62
14
0
03
06 0
10
08 0
09
99 0
00
20 0
12
10 0
01
37
973(G /L Cart Track)
989
988
1001
987
1002
1005
1007
1006
1008
1009 0
20
25
0
04
93 0
00
75 0
94
09
0
17
03
0
16
81 0
05
73 0
03
15 0
72
15
0
00
57 0
02
16
In Bet Suy No 1009 & 782
781
780
782
776
777
774
773
772
771 0
60
01
0
00
20
15
0
43 0
00
66 0
11
85 0
09
18 0
17
10
0
03
12 0
00
43 0
03
42
750(G/L Cart Track)
659
667
679
677
676
675
684
685
688
686 0
00
31 0
22
15 0
09
18 0
01
59 0
09
21 0
00
20 Ὁ
12
95 0
05
57 0
40
01
0
00
46 345
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/ पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
District : ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
687 16. SHAHJAHANPUR ( Contd ... )
690
691
707
706
701
701/1
705
702
703 State: RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 +
0
05
11 0
10
80 0
33
04
0
10
91 0
08
44 0
02
52
}
0
20
00
0
13
13 0
01
03 0
01
44
536(G/L CartTrack)
498
497
495
494
491
492
460
464
463
461
462 0
33
14
0
12
31 0
07
38 0
09
11 0
42
03
0
10
08
0
03
16 0
20
06
0
14
40 0
00
20 0
17
19
0
10
89
441(G/L River)
403
402
404
405
398
397
396
394
395
1228
1229 0
09
90 0
06
12
00
20 0
12
96 0
03
60 0
12
06
0
66
06
0
00
20 0
49
13
0
82
08
0
23
04
0
52
02
390(P.W.D . Road)
0
02
88
391( P.W.D . Road)
346
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926
State : RAJASTHAN
ALWAR
District:
Tehsil : BEHROR
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
Khasara No.
Sr. No.
Name of the Village
3
6
5
1
4
2
0
10
02
16. SHAHJAHANPUR ( Contd ... )
392( P.W.D . Road)
0
387
88
02
0
42
1304
01
0
21
1305
08
0
92
1306
07
0
20
1307
00
0
42
05
1317
22
0
05
1316
0
1318
00
34
0
65
1315
16
0
20
1314
00
1321 (G/ L Cart Track)
0
01
53
}}
1293(G/L Cart Track)
0
06
1323
10
0
1322
01
48
0
85
1324
15
0
02
59
1334( G/L Cart Track)
0
10
90
1342
0
75
1341
05
55
01
1338
0
72
1340
01
0
57
1339
10
0
1337
52
11
0
63
1336
08
0
32
1385
13
0
10
58
1391
0
00
1390
50
0
14
13
1394
0
12
1397
61
0
03
01
1398
1396
0
56
02
0
24
1400
15
0
1403
11
52
0
59
1405
05
47
0
1406
04
0
00
76
1404
0
17
1407
01 347
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
District : ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
1410 16. SHAHJAHANPUR ( Contd ... )
1411
1422
1421 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6
5
4
0
13
50 0
13
51 0
05
21 0
09
34 0
01
44
1415(G/ L Cart Track)
1419
1420 0
00
58 0
12
30 0
03
78
1500(G/L Cart Track)
1589
1591
1611
1609
1612
1613
1614
1618 17. JONAYCHAKHURD
1776
1777
1778
742
741
738
739
736
735
734
732
731
706
708
710
709
711
712
697
696
695 0
07
07 0
11
26 0
77
17
0
02
73 0
11
49 0
02
53 0
16
68 0
07
71 0
01
15 0
11
99 0
02
40 0
03
60 0
00
20 0
14
88 0
11
72 0
03
04 0
00
94
13
32 0
14
46 0
02
24 0
04
68 0
04
32 0
03
30 0
02
51 0
16
56 0
04
50 0
07
60 0
08
57 0
60
03 348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : BEHROR
District: ALWAR
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Sr. No.
Khasara No.
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
1
4
2
3
5
6
0
04
68
694
17. JONAYCHAKHURD ( Contd ... )
0
658
10
02
0
657
08
95
0
638
28
04
0
20
636
00
01
13
637(G/L)
0
629
66
13
0
630
01
86
0
26
01
628(G/ L CartTrack)
0
20
00
625(G/L)
0
626
61
04
0
01
626/1856
80
0
07
02
622
0
621
37
04
0
620
20
02
0
05
59
620/1849
0
12
619
06
0
00
618
20
ة
18. GUGALKOTA
76
1755
05
0
1752
07
74
0
10
1753
98
0
1750
17
64
0
1713
12
96
0
1714
00
20
0
1708
08
80
0
1709
00
20
0
1686
03
96
0
1687
12
60
0
1685
00
20
0
1679
06
48
1688
0
00
42
0
1669
10
52
0
1670
09
97
0
1671
00
20
0
1666
06
74
0
1655
00
40 349
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Tehsil : BEHROR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3 1
2
1656 18. GUGALKOTA ( Contd ... )
1628
1627
1625
1624
1600(G /L Cart Track)
452/2234
452
451
450
431/2247
431
393(G/L Cart Track)
384(G/L Pasture)
392
391
379
378
380
375
374
479
480
483
484
490
489
494
495
497
496(G/L Well )
501
500(G/LWell )
499
508
509
554
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
07
92 0
58
08
12 0
06
40 0
05
0
68
04
0
02
11
20 0
00
0
80
15
36 0
09
0
05
76 0
00
55
20 0
00
0
06
48 0
00
90 0
17
65 0
02
65 0
12
04 0
00
20 0
00
20 0
14
54 0
17
28
00
0
20 0
10
44
72 0
11
0
00
20 0
02
52
28 0
08
0
05
40 0
03
06
08
31 0
0
00
20
00
0
38
17 0
06
70 0
00
28 0
08
37 0
05
0
20
00 350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
Tehsil : BEHROR
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District : ALWAR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
550 18. GUGALKOTA ( Contd ... )
549
529
544
543
541
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
6
5
4
00 0
09
0
14
00
07
0
34
24 0
06
10
95
06
0
44
05
29 0
540(G/L)
607
01
68 0
86
00
0
539(G/L)
538
609
1675 19. ΚΑΝΚAR
1676
1677
1671
1670
1669
1668
1667
1630
1631
1666
1632
1650
1649
1648
1647
1646
1636
1638 0
00
48 0
74
17
76 0
14
04 0
07
76
03
0
0
00
18
47 0
07
70 0
05
0
10
80 0
00
20
00
20 0
07
42 0
75 0
02
0
01
43
83 0
08
03
74 0
0
41
08
20 0
00
0
07
38 0
20
00
0
07
65 0
01
34
1615 ( G/L Cart Track)
1608
1607
1609
1610
1602
82
13
0
01
48 0
0
02
49
20 0
00
35 0
13 351 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18,1926
District : ALWAR
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : BEHROR
Area
Are
Khasara No.
Sr. No.
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
1
3
4
5
2
6
1601
0
17
55 19. KANKAR ( Contd ... )
1598
0
13
68
[No. R- 31015/73/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2005
*
का. आ. 100.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली `राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए:
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री वी.पी. पाठक , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड , एम . बी. - 7 , महाश्वेता नगर , महेन्द्र भटनागर मार्ग , उज्जैन 456010 ( मध्यप्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
3830 Gl/2004-19 352
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश
जिला: उज्जैन
तहसील: उज्जैन
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
4
3
2
1
0.0432
547
1. पालखंदा
0.2160
544
545
0.0884
0.2304
542
0.4248
505
0.1656
507/574
0.2520
503
0.0270
502
0.0666
427 (शा० सड़क)
0.1262
483
0.0684
484
0.0540
485
0.3520
488
0.1350
487
0.1980
466
0.0720
467
0.1044
468
0.1296
444
0.0090
445
446
0.0360
0.0576
313(शा० नाला)
0.2250
293
0.5400
279
0.0720
267
0.1080
278
0.2520
277
0.0954
257
0.0756
258
0.0648
259
0.0612
260
0.1620
254
252
0.1440
0.0990
253
0.1275
1093
2. पिपलोदा द्वारकाधीश
0.0360
1087
0.1778
1084
0.3096
1085
0.0396
1075
0.3010
1074
0.0924
1073
0.0216
1050 (शा० सड़क)
0.2880
1048 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
353
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
सर्वे नंबर क्र० ग्राम का नाम
3 1
2
1045 2. पिपलोदा द्वारकाधीश (जारी..)
1044
1025
1026
1027
1029
1035, 1036
1037
1038, 1039
618
619,620-
617 ( शा० सडक)
573
571 , 572
546
538
537
525
526
527
530
528
506 (शा० नाला)
516
517
519
515 (शा० सड़क)
513
512
440 (शा० नाला)
511
474
475
502
500
499
495
496
489 (शा० सडक)
105
104(शा० भूमि)
103 (शा ० सड़क)
78
77
76
75 क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
4
0.2050
0.2274
0.0020
0.2196
0.0086
0.1580
0.2268
0.0850
0.0540
0.1345
0.2034
0.2736
0.0360
0.2386
0.0282
0.1728
0.2165
0.0630...
0.1326
0.0294
0.0360
0.1530
0.0306
0.1440
0.0054
-0.0108
0.0360
0.0054
0.1476
0.0540
0.0540
0.1260
0.3348
0.1296
0.1224
0.0576
0.1350
0.3510
0.0216
0.0854
0.0054
0.0802
0.0565
0.2052
0.1845
0.0396 354
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
4
2
3
1
74
0.3027
2. पिपलोदा द्वारकाधीश (जारी...)
73
0.3011
72
0.2824
54
0.2340
55
0.2074
50
0.0360
57
0.0270
0.0108
3. गावडी
671 (शा० नाला)
683
0.1404
880
0.0720
679
0.0450
677
0.0036
078
0.1440
673
0.1944
647
0.1944
648
0.0270
649,850
0.0180
646
0.1440
645
0.0012
011 से 624
0.3600
810
0.0087
0.1476
000
400,408
0.0180
405
0.1158
404
0.0540
104
0.0150
161
0.1592
159
0.1044
158
0.0720
173
0.0252
116
0.0338
117
0.1800
109
0.0000
118
0.0540
108
0.0684
128
0.0603
127
0.0540
120
0.0612
130
0.2271
0.7200
95, 96, 97, 99
4. माधोपुर
79
0.0380
0.2160
85 (रेल्वे विभाग)
8
0.0512
0.1791
8,7
27
0.2000
28
0.0380
32
0.0540 355 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18,1926
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
4
3
1
2
0.0195
31
4. माधोपुर (जारी.....)
0.0180
29, 30
[फा. सं. आर-31015/66/2004- ओ.आर-11 ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 6th January, 2005
S. O. 100.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule, may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri V.P. Pathak, Competent Authority , Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, MB - 7 , Mahashweta Nagar , Mahendra Bhatnagar Road , Ujjain- 456010 ( Madhya Pradesh ) ,
SCHEDULE
TEHSIL : UJJAIN
DISTRICT : UJJAIN
STATE : MADHYA PRADESH
SURVEY NO .
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
AREA IN HECTARE
3
2
1
4
547
1.
0.0432 PALKHANDA
544
0.2160
545
0.0684
542
0.2304
505
0.4248
0.1656
507/574
503
0.2520
502
0.0270 356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
SURVEY NO .
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
3 2
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] AREA IN HECTARE
4
0.0666
427(G. Road)
1. PALKHANDA (Contd..)
483
484
485
488
487
466
467
468
444
445
446 0.1262
0.0684
0.0540
0.3520
0.1350
0.1980
0.0720
0.1044
0.1296
0.0090
0.0360
0.0576
313 (G. Drain)
293
279
297
278
277
257
258
259
260
254
252
253
1093 2. PIPLODA DWARKADHISH
1087
1084
1085
1075
1074
1073 0.2250
0.5400
0.0720
0.1080
0.2520
0.0954
0.0756
0.0648
0.0612
0.1620
0.1440
0.0990
0.1275
0.0360
0.1778
0.3096
0.0396
0.3010
0.0924
0.0216
1050 (G. Road)
1048
1045
1044
1025
1026
1027
1029 0.2880
0.2050
0.2274
0.0020
0.2196
0.0086
0.1580
0.2268
1035, 1036
1037
1038, 1039
618
619, 620 0.0850
0.0540
0.1345
0.2034
0.2736
617(G. Road)
4 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
357
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005 /पौष 18,1926
SURVEY NO .
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
3 2
1
2.
573 PIPLODA DWARKADHISH ( Contd..)
571, 572
546
538
537
525
526
527
530
528
506(G. Drain)
516
517
519
515(G. Road)
513
512
440(G. Drain)
511
474
475
502
500
499
495
496
489(G. Road)
105
104 (G.L. )
103(G. Road)
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
54
55
56
57 3. GAVADI
671 (G. Drain)
683
680
679
677 AREA IN HECTARE
4
0.0360
0.2386
0.0282
0.1728
0.2165
0.0630
0.1326
0.0294
0.0360
0.1530
0.0306
0.1440
0.0054
0.0108
0.0360
0.0054
0.1476
0.0540
0.0540
0.1260
0.3348
0.1296
0.1224
0.0576
0.1350
0.3510
0.0216
0.0854
0.0054
0.0802
0.0565
0.2052
0.1845
0.0396
0.3027
0.3911
0.2824
0.2340
0.2674
-0.0360
0.0270
0.0108
0.1494
0.0720
0.0450
0.0036 358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 8.2005/ PAUSA 18 , 1926
NAME OF VILLAGE
SURVEY NO .
S.No.
1
3 2
678 3 GAVADI ( Contd.. )
673
647
648
649, 650
646
645
611 to 624
610
609
406, 408
405
404
164
161
159
158
173
116
117
109
118
108
128
127
129
130 4. MADHOPUR
PART II -SEC 3 ( ii ) | AREA IN HECTARE
4
0.1440
0.1944
0.1944
0.0270
0.0180
0.1440
0.0612
0.3600
0.0987
:0.1476
0.0180
0.1158
0.0540
0.0150
0.1592
0.1044
0.0720
0.0252
0.0338
0.1800
0.0990
0.0540
0.0684
0.0603
0.0540
0.0612
0.2271
0.7200
95, 96, 97, 99
79
0.0360
0.2160
65 ( Railway Deptt .)
8
6,7
27
28
32
31
29, 30
0.0512
0.1791
0.2090
0.0360
0.0540
0.0195
0.0180
[No. R - 31015/66/2004 -O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR . Under Secy .
359 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
AWARD
श्रम मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004
The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012/ 07 /98 - IR ( C - I ) dated 16-12-98 has referred the following industrial dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication: -
"Whether the action of the management of Air India in dismissing Shri Vikas Kr . Dhanak, Handyman , StaffNo. 31419, w.e.f. 1-11-96 , isjust , fair and legal , if not what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from what date ?"
का. आ. 101.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एअर इंडिया लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली-I के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-12-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. - 11012/7/98- आई. आर. ( सी -1 ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR New Delhi , the 9th December , 2004
S.O. 101. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, New Delhi - I now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-12-2004.
[No. L - 11012/ 7/ 98 - IR (C - 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI
Shri S.S. Bal , Presiding Officer.
L. D. No. 16/99
In the matter of dispute between:
Shri Vikash Kumar Dhanak ,
S/o Shri Bhola- Ram , R/ o 1552 , Qutab Road,
Hanuman Mandir,
-Workman
New Delhi - 110055.
VERSUS
Air India Ltd .. Air India Complex, IGI Airport Terminal - II . New Delhi - 10037 .
-Management
2. Brief facts as culled from record are that the workman Shri Vikash Kumar Dhanak was appointed as Handyman ( Staff) w.e.f. 3-2-1994 with respondent management M/ s Air India Limited and confirmed w.e.f. 1-8-94 and that he was discharging his duties to the satisfaction of the seniors and his conduct and behaviour was not blame worthly and discharging his duties diligently and was quite regular but due to falling health of his father he was constrained to take leave for long periods and he being eldest member of the family had to look after his father who has taken seriously ill . Management issued a show cause notice dated 4th of March , 96 to him to explain his conduct , reasons of his absence but he could not furnish any explanation and thus for his conduct domestic enquiry was conducted against him which was concluded on 21st Junc , 1996. During the enquiry he has explained his absence to the presenting officer and the 1.0 . appointed for the purpose . He also wanted to produce some relevant documents but the enquiry officer told him that the same were not required to be filed . He was quite perturbed . The management adopted callous and mechanical attitude of the Management and that the workman was hoping/ expecting a leniency from the management. It is further stated that the workman could not attend the assigned duty for total number ofdays of 352 days over a period of two years i.e. over a period during the year 1994 to 1996. The services were terminated vide order dated 6th August , 1996 and he was dismissed from service and punishment of dismissal was imposed on him . The management moved for approval of the said order before the National Tribunal at Bombay knowing well that the workman was not be able to meet the expenses of journey to Bombay to conduct his case in National Tribunal Bombay. The workman is only bread winner of his family and the punishment is not appropriate and disproportionate to the charge . The absence from duty was bona fide as mentioned above and the action of the management is against the principle of natural justice and in view of the above submission the impugned order is sought to be recalled and workman sought reinstatement by recalling the impugned order.
APPEARANCES :
None for the workman .
3. The claim has been contested by the management by filing written statement taking preliminary objections with pleas that the claimant remained unauthorisedly Ms. Poonam Dass for the management .
3830 Gl/2004-20 360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
absent for a period of 325 days between February, 1994 to January , 1996. Claimant was charge sheeted for habitual absence without leave on 4th of March , 96. He failed to furnish any satisfactory reply to the charge sheet . Management instituted enquiry against the workman/ claimant to enquire into the charges levelled against the claimant . The enquiry proceedings were held in accordance with the principles of natural justice and enquiry committee found the claimant to be guilty of the charge of absence from duty for 325 days and for indulging in subversive activities i.c. indiscipline . The competent authority agreed with the finding of the enquiry committce and awarded punishment of dismissal from service of the management vide impugned order dated 6th of August , 96. On merits it is not disputed that the claimant was appointed and confirmed and rest of the allegations are denied . It is stated that his pleas are misconccived the workman admitted the charges against him and he found guilty of the same by the enquiry committee and was awarded appropriate punishment by the disciplinary authority is in view of the long absence from duty for 325 day's on the part of the claimant and that his conduct shows that he is not interested in the job .
4. Written statement was followed by rejoinder wherein he denied controverted pleas and reiterated contents of his claim statement .
5. Thereafter the matter was fixed for evidence of the workman . He filed his affidavit in evidence but failed to appear for cross- examination on several hearings on 6-8-01 . 14-9-02.6-11-01 . 17-1-02 , 1-3-02 . 19-4-02 . 1-7-02 . 9-9-02 . 28-11-02 . 18-2-03 . 29-4-03 , 8-7-03 . 9-10-03 . 8-12-03 , 28-1-04,20-4-04 . 12-7-04 and on 20-9-04 and was ultimately proceeded ex parte .
6. The management filed affidavit of Shri G.S. Kharlsa as MWI and examined him in its evidence .
7. I have heard Miss Poonam Das and perused the record meticulously .
8. The workman claimant has admitted in his statement of claim that he remained absent for 325 days from duty but his stand is that he had to remain absent due to ill-health of his father. He has not produced or proved any documents on record showing that his father was ill at any point of time even if it is assumed that his father is ill as claimed by him he was required to obtain leave by filing application . He ( workman ) failed even to submit an application in this regard to the management . He has also admitted that enquiry was conducted and he was asked to explain his conduct but he failed to furnish any reasonable explantion. He was also charge sheeted and found guilty . The perusal of copy of pitch cards produced shows that he remained absent from February 94 to March . 96. Thus the admission of the workman
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] that he remained absent for 325 days and the affidavit of Shri G.S. Khalsa Assistant Manager, Personnel MW1 attendance card U.P.C. go to show that the charge of long absence against him of remaining absent for 325 days is amply duly proved from the material on record . From the averments made in the workman application it is also proved on record from the letters Ex . M.W1 /7 and MW1/ 8 that the workman was given an hearing in respect of sickness and imposition of punishment .
9. Thus there is sufficient evidence on record that the charges against the workman claimant is duly proved. The workman has remained absent for a long period of 325 days for about two years without any resonable cause . There is no material on record to show that his father was ill at any point of time . He is also not attending the tribunal/ court on dates of hearings since 6-8-2001 and thus failed to appear on several hearings. His conduct goes to show that he has no interest left in the prosecution of this case .
10. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case I am of the view that he ( workman ) does not deserve any leniency in the absence of any material or any ground which shows that he deserves the same. Hence I am of the opinion that the impugned order is justified and does not suffer from any illegality. Reference is answered accordingly.
File be consigned to record room .
Further it is ordered that the requisite number of copies of this award may be forwarded to the Central Government for necessary action at their end .
Dated: 29-11-04 .
S.S. BAL, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर , 2004
का. आ. 102.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद ।। के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 134/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-12-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/348/96- आई. आर. (सी -1 ) ]
एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th December, 2004 S.O. 102. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 134/97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court . Dhanbad - 11 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-12-2004 .
[No. L - 20012/ 348 / 96 - IR ( C - 1 ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer.
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 .
Reference No. 134 of 1997
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Barora Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman
361
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
management posted him as sand Munshi at Damoda Colliery and in that capacity he worked upto 20-2-92 . They submitted that as the management was satisfied with his work as sand Munshi he was entrusted with the job of Loading Munshi in the siding and in that capacity he worked upto 15-9-95 continuously . They alleged that though management got the service of the concerned workman as Loading Munshi did not consider necessary to pay wages of Clerical Grade III .
They disclosed that in the year 1995 the concerned workman submitted representation for releasing his wages ofclerk in Grade III as well as of his change of designation from Cat.I to Grade - III but the management did not give him any relief in view of his prayer . They submitted that management again on 17-11-95 authorised him to work as loading Munshi at Albian Rly. siding of Damoda Colliery.
: Mr. R.R. Prasad .
Advocate
On behalf of the employers
They alleged that they had been compelled to raise Industrial dispute for conciliation when management refused to consider his regularisation in Clerical Grade- III in spite of his rendering service in that grade continuously since July, 1991. Accordingly they submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to regularise the concerned workman in Clerk Grade - III with effect from 1-7-92 .
: Mr. B.Μ. Prasad,
Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal .
Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th November, 2004
AWARD
The Govt . of India. Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the I.D. Act . 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/348 / 96 - IR ( Coal - 1 ) , dated, the 25th November, 1997.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the claim of the Union that Shri S.S. Prasad . General Mazdoor is performing the job of Loading Munshi and therefore , demanding his regularisation is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf in brief is as follows :
The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman was appointed as General Mazdoor on compassionate ground in Cat . I and posted at Damoda Colliery with effect from 19-12-90 . He was matriculate at the time of his appointment . As the concerned workman was found sincere and hard working on 4-7-91 3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum - rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in the Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman.
They submitted that the concerned workman as per clause 9.4.3 got his employment w.e.f. 19-12-90 as a daily rated worker . As per policy the promotional channel of daily rated worker is from one category to another category and not from category to grade . Accordingly there was no scope at all to regularise the concerned worknian in clerical Grade . They submitted that the concerned workman has got employment on compassionate ground was given special favour by the colliery management to work as Munshi during leave and sick vacancy with a view to give him opportunity to learn clerical jobs so that in the event of selection of candidates in the clerical cadre, his case could be considered for his selection in future but taking opportunity of the same he has placed his claim for his regularisation in clerical grade III illegally and as the management could not accede to his claim he raised an Industrial Dispute .
They submitted that JBCCI Circular No. 34 dt. 17-7-84 had clearly mentioned about the mode of selection of any worker in clerical cadre and the manner of promotion from Clerical Grade - III to upwards as për recommendation of D.P.C. Similarly Circular No. 38 dt. 25-9-84 had clearly mentioned how promotion in 362
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] clerical Cadre for loading personnel will be done . Disclosing directions given in these two circulars they submitted that it was not possible on their part to follow pick and choose policy in considering promotion of the concerned workman . Accordingly, they submitted that they neither committed any illegallity nor took any arbitrary decision violating the principle of naturaljustice in not considering his claim. They in the circumstances submitted their prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workm ח
4 Points to be Decided
and the said selection committee conducts test/ interview ofthose candidates and thereafter recommend the names of the selected candidates for their appointment in the postof Clerk Gr. III . He disclosed that excepting this process there is no other process through which a departmental candidate can be appointed as clerk Gr. 111 , He disclosed that this power of appointment of Clerk Gr. III is only retained by the Headquarter and not by the G.M. or any officer of the colliery. In support of this claim he relied on the circulars issued by the management time to time marked as Ext . M - 1 to M - 1 /2. This witness however. during cross -examination admitted that letters issued by the Dy. C.P.M. are considered valid letters if the same are duly approved by the G.M.
"Whether the claim of the Union that Shri S.S. Prasad . General Mazdoor is performing the job of Loading Munshi and therefore , demanding his regularisation is legal and justified ? If so . to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
5. Finding with Reasons
Ext . M - 1 and M - 2 are the circulars issued by the management time to time which shows that clear direction was given to the Arca G.M. not to direct and deploy any workman of TR/ PR in clerical grade howsoever qualified and if it is so done he should be reverted back to his original post. As per cadre scheme of the ministerial staff, Ext , M -1 /2 it has been mentioned that competent authority i.c. Chief Executive ofthe Company or Arca G.M. or Chief ofthe Project as the case maybe appoint a clerk in Grade- 111 by way of selection /test if that workman possess requisite qualification i e Matriculation or equivalent examination from any recognised Board of examination .
It transpires from the record that the sponsoring Union with a view to establish their claim examined the concerned workman as WW-1 . Management also in support of their claim examined one witness as MW- 1 . Now considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and also considering evidence of both WW - 1 and MW- 1 there is no dispute to hold that the concerned workman got his employinent on compassionate ground under the management as General Mazdoor in Cat. I on 19-12-90 and posted at Damoda Colliery . He is Matriculate. WW - 1 during his evidence disclosed that since 1991 management deployed him to work as clerk in Grade- III and till date continuously he is discharging his duties as loading Munshi in Clerical Grade - III . In support of his claim he relied on certain documents marked as Ext . W- 1to W -7 He during his evidence disclosed that he submitted representation to the management for his regularisation in Clerk Gr - III but as they did not give any importance to the same he was compelled to raisc Industrial dispute for his relief. It has been further exposed from his evidence that though the nature of job which he performs continuously since 1992 is permanent in nature management never paid difference of wages to him. On the contrary in spite of discharging higlier responsibility they are paying wages of Cat-l General Mazdoor.
Considering the evidence of the workman it transpires that he was not deputed to work as clerk beng a selection candidate by the management though it transpires that he got requisite qualifications to that effect . If the contents of the Circular dt . 29-6-92/ 1-7-92 Ext . M- 1/1 is taken into consideration it was bounden duty of the local management to revert the concerned workman to his original post . But it appears that by passing the specific direction given in the said circular local management allowed himto work as Loading Munshi . This attitude of the local management was deterimental to the interest of the management but the Headquarter did not consider necessary to take any action against that officer under whose direction the concerned workman started discharging his duties as Loading Munshi knowing fully well that he was at that time General Mazdoor Cat - l . Subsequently the concerned workman was upgraded in Cat- 11 but he was deployed in performing his clerical job as Loading Munshi . According to the concerned workman till date he is discharging his duties in that capacity. i.c. from 1992 for more than ten years he is doing the clerical job as Loading Munshi . No explanation on the part of the management is forthcoming to explain why the concerned workman in spite of direction given in the circular as mentioned above was allowed to perform his duties as Clerk Gr . 11 ?
It transpires from the office orderdt . 12/ 13-11-92 ( Ext. W- 1 ) that the concerned workman was allowed to On the contrary MW-1 during his evidence categorically denied that the concerned workman was ever deputed by the management to work in the post of Munshi which comes under Clerical Gr. III , He disclosed that in case of recruitment of any Clerk in Gr III from Departmental candidates management as per JBCCI Circular issue Circulars to the workers inviting applications having requisite qualification for their selection in the post of Clerk Gr.111 . Hebarther disclosed that on the basis of the Circular when departmental candidates having requisite qualifications submit applications the management forms a selection committee [ भाग 11- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
work as coal receiver though he was Gen. Mazdoor Cat - 1 . This order was issued under signature of Dy . C.M.E. Damoda Colliery. Again by office order dt . 17-11-95 ( Ext . W-2) the concerned workman was directed by the Project Officer to work at BJ / Albin siding . ThereafterG.M. by letter dt . 19/22-6-2000 (Ext . W- 5) called for a report relating to status of his current deployment with specific comments for examining his case on their part . In response to that letter ofthe G.M. , Project Officer Damoda Colliery submitted a detailed report about the concerned workman which speaks clearly that since Nov. , 1991 he is continuously discharging his duties as clerk under direction of the Superior Authority. The report further speaks that instead of issuance of reversion order under direction of Dy. Chief Personnel Manager status quo was maintained in his case i.e. he was allowed to work as clerk. The letter dt . 16/ 18-10-95 issued by the Dy. Chief Personnel Manager, Barora Area speaks as follows :-
"As per the recommendation of the Committee , the G.M. has agreed to maintain status quo of thesc persons (including concerned workman ) . You are requested to please maintain their status quo and intimate us per return dak ".
MW - 1 during his evidence denied the fact of performing duties of the concerned workman in clerical job. The letter of the management which I have discussed above will expose categorically that MW- 1 did not depose correctly before this Tribunal . It is clear from my discussion above that as per recommendation of the Committee,G.M. agreed to maintain status quo in respect of the concerned workman . No evidence on the part of the management is forthcoming before this Tribunal to show if that status quo order has been vacated or not. If so , there is sufficient reason to hold that the concerned workman still is discharging his duties as clerk in Grade- III . It is to be borne into mind that concerned workman in the year 1990 got his appointment as General Mazdoor in Cat - I and not as a clerk . It was the management under whose desire and direction he started discharging his duties as clerk though for discharging higher responsibility he was not paid the difference of wages and in this way still he is discharging his duties . This attitude of the management will expose clearly that he was abruptly exploited by the management and intended to throw him out the moment he submitted his representation for his regularisation as Clerk Gr - III . There is no dispute to hold thatHeadquarter time to time by issuing circulars directed the local management not to deploy any workman of TR/ PR inclerical job . It is seen that local management did not consider necessary to pay any importance to the said direction. On the contrary they moved as of their choice . Consequently as per recomınendation of the committee , G.M. agreed to issue order to maintain status quo and that order is still subsisting. In spite of this fact the management did not consider necessary to regularise him
363
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
as clerk Gr - II . Though it appears that the claim of the concerned workman is contrary to selection policy of Clerk through Departmental candidates , the case of the concerned workman should be considered as a special case because of the fact that he for years together has been exploited by the management taking higher service from him for which nothing was paid to him .
Accordingly , after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances I hold that the case of the concerned workman is a benefitting one for getting his relief. I hold that the claim of the concerned workman stands on cogent footing and he has been able to substantiate the same and for which he is entitled to get his relief.
In the result the following Award is rendered :---
"The claim of the Union that Sh . S.S. Prasad . General Mazdoor is performing the job of Loading Munshi and therefore , demanding his regularisation is legal and justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is entitled to be regularised in Clerical Grade- III with effect from the date of Reference made by the Ministry subject to the condition that the concerned workman possesses minimum academic qualification for the post of Clerk Grade- 111 . He will be entitled to get wage of Clerk Grade III from that date after adjustment of difference ofwages already received by him. " The management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above.
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer . नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 103.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को . को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 85/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-12-04 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/204/95- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 9th December , 2004 S.O. 103. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 85/96 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Dhanbad - 11 now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation 364
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18 , 1926
PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-12-2004 .
[No. L - 20012 /204/ 95 - IR(C - 1 ) ]
S. S. GUPTA . Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
of private land was acquired by the management from individual land owner and as a general policy management decided to provide employment to suitable persons from the family of land loser as a measure of relief to the families who lost their agricultural lands for the benefits of the plant and such rights of the land losers have been upheld by the Hon'ble Apex Court .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO - 2 ) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer .
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947.
Reference No. 85 of 1996
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Dugda CoalWashery of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
They submitted that the concerned workman as belonged to such family of land loser he was provided with employment w.c.f. 20-1-92 in the capacity of Field (Site) Assistant during construction of Froth Floatation's Plant of Dugda Coal Washery and he performed his duties to the entire satisfaction till 15-10-87 . Thereafter management stopped his service. They alleged that though the concerned workman was engaged on duty for the benefit of the manageinent of Dugda Coal Washing Plant he was shown on records as the worker of Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. Camp Dugda Coal Washery site till 15-10-87 and beyond that date he was neither provided with any job nor notice U/ s . 25F of the 1.D. Act . 1947 was issued to him .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman :Mr. K. Chakravorty , Advocate
Onbehalf of the employers :Mr. B.M. Prasad , Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Washery
Dated , Dhanbad , the 18th November , 2004 .
AWARD
Accordingly, not only the workman himself but also the sponsoring Union represented the matter before the management and in response to that representation management by letter dt. 29-11-1987 issued letter under the signature of the Personnel Manager by which the concerned workman was offered with a job of general mazdoor which he agreed to accept . The said offer of cmployment was not materialised for the fault of the management and for which the concerned workman remained unemplyed. They submitted that in view of policy decision , the concerned workman being a member of the family of land losers not only is entitled to get his employment but also his demand for employment is justificed for his rendering continuous service as Field Assistant w.e.f. 20-1-1982 to 15-10-1987 as per provision laid down U/ s . 25 - F of the I.D. Act .
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act . 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/204/95 - IR ( Coal - I ) , dated, the 20th August, 1996 .
SCHEDULE
Accordingly, the sponsoring Union submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to provide suitable employment with continuity of service.from 20-1-82 and back wages from 15-10-87 along with other consequential relief.
"Whether the demand of the Union for employment of Shri Sashi Sekhar Mahta , Ex - Site Assistant employed through contractor by the management of Dugda Coal Washery is justified ? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? "
3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum - Rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in the Written Statement which was submitted on behalf of the concerned workman.
2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf in brief is as follows : -
They submitted that the concerned workman was a workman of M/ s . Triveni Engincoring Works , a contractor Firm and for which no employer -employce relationship ever existed between him and the management . They disclosed that M/ s. Triveni Engineering Works was awarded the contract for construction of Froth Floatation They submitted that Dugda Coal Washery is one of the largest Coal Washing Plant under Public Sector Undertaking with the administrative control of the present management and several thousand workers have been engaged for its proper operation and maintenance . They disclosed that for installation of the said plant huge area [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
Plant at Dugda Coal Washery on turn key basis. As per the terms of contract the contractor Firm was required to carry on the constructions and installation job and after completion of installation of all the machineries required to give trial run before it was taken over by them for its operation . They submitted that as the contract was given on temporary nature of jobs for the duration of the construction of F.F. Plant and its commissioning the workman of the contractor cannot demand for their absorption by the principal employer . They further submitted that contract job was awarded legally and validly toM/s . Triveni Engineering Works and all the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 and the Rules made thereunder were fully complied with . They disclosed that no notification was issued U/s . 10 of the said Act prohibiting engagement of Contract Labour for construction of the Washery or F.F. Plant . All the employees , sclected , recruited by the contractor were engaged on the non -prohibitory categories ofjobs . They were paid by the Contractor and their works were supervised by the Contractor. They disclosed that it was the contractor who appointed the concerned workman as one of his supervisors to supervise the work of the workman deployed on the construction job .
They submitted that as the concerned workman was a worker employed by the contractor, he does not have any right to claim for his employment under the management in view of his prayer. Accordingly, they submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman .
4. Points to be decided
"Whether the demand of the Union for employment of Shri Sashi Sekhar Mahta . Ex - Site Assistant employed through contractor by the management of Dugda Coal Washery is justified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? " 5. Finding with Reasons
It transpires from the record that sponsoring Union with a view to substantiate their claim examined the concerned workman as WW - 1 . Management on the contrary did not adduce any evidence in support of their claim.
WW- 1 i.c. the concerned workman during his evidence disclosed that M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works was entrusted for construction of Froth Floatation Plant . He admitted that the said Engineering Works appointed him in connection with the said work on 21-9-82 which was completed in the year 1986 and in the same year the same was handed over to the management for its operation commercially. He disclosed that he was in service till then when the plant started running commercially . He further disclosed that as the nature of work of the plant was continuous he served there from 1986 to 1990 continuously
365
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
and during this period in each year he attended his duty. for more than 240 days and he worked under supervision of the officers of the management not only but they also used to supply implements for work. Even the management used to pay him wages for his work though not according to the provision of N.C.W.A.
Hefurther disclosed that their names were referred to the management by the Employment Exchange and thereafter they appeared before the Interview Board though management did not publish the result of the said interview. Concerned workman during his evidence relied on certain documents marked as -Ext . W/ 1 to W/ 5 . WW- 1 in his evidence specifically disclosed that management without assigning any reason stopped him from service.
Thiswitness during his cross -examination admitted that from 1982 to 1986 he directly worked under M/s . Triveni Engineering Works. He also admitted that the said construction work was going on under that contractorship Firm . He admitted further that management neither issued any letter of appointment nor any pay slip or identity card to him . He also admitted that management never issued any letter to him stating the nature of work he would perform. He further admitted that management did not select a single person as per interview whose names were forwarded by the Employment Exchange ..
The sponsoring Union in the Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman disclosed categorically that for construction of Dugda Coal Washery management acquired land from different land owners and as a policy matter they agreed to employ any member ofthe family to be considered suitable . It has been asserted by the sponsoring Union that as the family of the concerned workman was affected for acquisition of their land management provided him with employment on 20-1-82 in the capacity of Field Assistant during construction of Froth Floatation Plant of Dugda Coal Washery.
It is really surprising to note that the concerned workman during his evidence did not make any whisper that he got his employment by the management under the scheme of land losing family and posted as Field Assistant . He also during his evidence did not utter a single word if the management acquired any land of his family for construction of the said washery. Therefore , 1 find no dispute to hold that facts disclosed in para 6 and 8 of the written statement finds no corroboration and for which there is no scope to accept the same and to arrive into conclusion that the concerned workman being a member of land losing family got his employment under the management. If the evidence of the concerned workman as WW- 1 is taken into consideration in relation to his rendering service it will expose that from 21-9-82 to 1986 he worked under M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works being appointed by the said concern in connection with the 366
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] construction of Froth Floatation Plant under Dugda Coal Washery. He in his evidence admitted that the said constructional work was completed in 1986 and the same was handed over to the management in the same year for its commercial operation . He admitted that he was in service till then when the plant started running commercially. Therefore , his evidence speaks clearly that to participate in the constructional work of the said plant he got his appointment by M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works and not by the management .
as Site Assistant under Triveni Engineering Works and not from 20-1-82 to 15-10-87 . It transpires from an interview letter dt . 29-10-87 (Ext . W-5 ) that the concerned workman was asked to appear before Interview Board under the management on 7-11-87 for the post ofGeneral mazdoor. It is the contention of WW - 1 that his name along with others was forwarded to the management by the employment exchange for the post of General mazdoor and thereafter management issued the said letter for interview . He disclosed that though he appeared in the said interview management did not publish its result . On the basis of such submission there is no scope to arrive into any conclusion that the concerned workman at that time was working under the management . Absolute onus is on the sponsoring union to establish that after taking over the plant by the management the concerned workman was engaged by the management to work there and in that capacity he worked till 1990.I find no hesitation to say that though onus was on the sponsoring union neither they or the concerned workman in course of hearing could be able to produce a single scrap of paper in support of such claim .
The next part of his service which WW - 1 disclosed in his evidence started from 1986 and continued till 1990 under the management , when the said plant began to run commercially. He disclosed that their names were forwarded by employment exchange and they appeared before the Interview Board though management did not publish its result . However, he claimed that from 1986 to 1990 he worked under the management continuously and put his attendance for more than 240 days in each year. It ishis further contention that mangement without giving him any notice U/ s . 25F of the 1.D. Act stopped him from his service . He further disclosed that during this period not only he used to work under direct supervision of the management officials but they also used to supply the implements for work. Even he used to draw wages directly from the management though not as per N.C.W.A.
If the Written statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf is taken into consideration it will expose that as Field Assistant he started working from 20-1-82 and he was stopped from his work w.e.f. 15-10-87. If this fact is taken into consideration it will expose that he neither got his appointment in the year 1991 nor his service was stopped on 21-9-92 . The representative of the concerned workman in course of hearing has failed to clarify this goss discrepancy .
It transpires from the document marked as Ext . W- 1 dt . 10-4-91 that Additional Chief Engineer (E & M ) forwarded a petition for employment of the concerned as General mazdoor to the Dy. C.P.M. , CCWO , Dhanbad for consideration. The copy of the petition which was forwarded along with that letter dt . 10-4-91 during hearing wasmarked as Ext . W - 2 . As per contents of his petition he claimed employment under the management taking the grounds that ( 1 ) he is a local man (2 ) his land was acquired by the management for construction of the said washery ( 3 ) that his father was an employce under the management ( 4 ) that he worked under Triveni Engineering Works from 20-1-82 to 15-4-86 and ( 5 ) Date of interview for the post of General Mazdoor fixed on 7-11-87 .
Therefore , nowhere from the said petition it could be seen that the concerned workman from 1986 to 1990- continuously worked under the management and during thisperiod he put his attendance for more than 240 days in each year. It is also not the case of the sponsoring Union that the concerned workman worked continuously under the management till 1990. On the contrary it is their specific claim that he worked under M / s . Triveni Engineering Works till 29-10-87 .
Ext. W- 3 , W-3 / 1 and W - 3 / 2 are the I.D. Card, Gate Pass and letter of request for issuance of gate pass in favour of the concerned workman for the period from 2-2-83 to 16-2-83,21-9-84 to 31-12-84 and 6-9-84 to 20-9-84 issued by Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. Documents marked as Ext . W/ 4 is a certificate issued under signature of Chief Erection Engincer. The Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. which shows that the concerned workman as Site Assistant worked under them from 1-2-83 to 30-4-84 . If this certificate which the concerned workman relied on is taken into consideration there is no scope to say in absence of any other cogent document that the concerned workman worked under the said concern from 20-1-82 to 15-10-87 continuously. On the contrary another certificate Ext . W-4/ 1 issued by the same concern shows that as Site Assistant further he worked from 5-10-84 to 15-4-86. Therefore, as per these two documents it has been exposed that on two separate occasion i.c. from 1-2-83 to 30-4-84 and 5-10-84 to 15-4-84 the concerned workman worked
For employment of the concerned workman the sponsoring union have made two fold claims ( 1 ) Their first claim is that management acquired land of the concerned workman for construction of the washery and asper policy decision and also in view of decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court management is liable to provide employment to him if he is considered suitable and as per rejoinder their second claim is that the contractor whom 367 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
the management engaged for construction of Froth Floatation Plant was a camouflage one and indisguise of the said concern it was the management who took up that constructional work and employed the concerned workman . They further submitted that the nature ofjob which the concerned workman performed was permanent in nature. As per their submission actually the concerned workman was an employee of the management but they illegally and arbitrarily without giving any notice U /s . 25F of the I.D. Act stopped him from his service and for which he deserves his regularisation .
Excepting the claim placed by the concerned workman the sponsoring Union during hearing has failed to produce a single scrap of paper to show that management acquired the land of the concerned workman. I have failed to understand how the sponsoring Union ignored this fact to substantiate their claim. If there is policy decision management cannot ignore employment of the concerned workman but before claining so it was bounden duty of the sponsoring Union to substantiate such fact. It is very much clear that sponsoring Union for the reason best known to thein ignored to establish the claim to that effect . Accordingly there is little scope to uphoid the contention of the sponsoring Union for employment ofthe concerned workman relying on the policy decision of the manageinent .
said Firm carried on all the constructional works of the said plant and in doing so they engaged the concerned workman . Accordingly, the concerned workman should be treated as direct employee of the management. In spite ofclaiming so the concerned workman during his evidence did not make any whisper to this effect . On the contrary in course of his evidence he categorically disclosed that the said Firm appointed him for the said construction work which was completed and handed over to the management in 1986. Ifthe evidence of the concerned workman is taken into consideration it will expose clearly that the terms of contract was ended the inoment they handed over the said plant to the management for its commercial operation. Therefore, according to WW- I he worked being an employce of the said Firm from 21-9-82 to 1986. Hedid not make any whisper to the effect that actually in the name of the said Firni management appointed him as Field (Site) Assistant . Therefore , the averment of WW- 1 does not tally with the claim of the sponsoring Union . In course of evidence the documents marked as Ext . W- 3 to W-4/ 1 shows clearly that the same were issued by his employer and not by the management . Even the petition which he submitted to the inanagement ( Ext . W- 2 ) also does not make any whisper that actually he was engaged by the management using the name of the said Firm . His evidence shows that after handing over the plant from 1986 to 1990 he continuously worked under the management and thereafter management stopped him from his service without assigning any reason and also without giving any notice U/ s . 25F of the I.D. Act . This fact which the concerned workman i.e. WW -1 disclosed during his evidence is not the case of the sonsoring Union . According to the clain of the sponsoring Union in the name of the Firm actually mangement employed him as Site Assistant and in that capacity he worked continuously from 20-1-82 10 15-10-87 and thereafter inanagcincut stopped him from his service .
Now it requires to be looked into if M/ s . Triveni Engincering Works who was entrusted with constructional work of Froth Floatation Plant at Dugda Coal Washery by the inanagement was a camouflage contractor and if so whether the concerned workinan got his employment by the managcinent in disguise of the said firm . It is the specific contention of the management that the contractual job for construction of Froth Floatation Plant was given to the said Firm on turn -key basis after complying with all the provisions of the Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970. It is their further contention that no notification was issued U/ s . 10 of the said Act prohibiting engagement of Contract Labour on the construction of F.F. Plant. Accordingly , all the employees recruited by the said Firm on the non - prohibitory categories ofjob. They further submitted that as the contract was awarded on a temporary nature ofjobs for the duration of the construction of the said Froth Floatation Plant and its commissioning the workmen of the contractor cannot demand for their absorption by the management as no employer and employee relationship grew up .
1 find no hesitation to say that in spite of charming so the sponsoring Unin has failed to produce a single scap of paper. If the principle of Sec . 106 of the Evidence Act is taken into consideration there is sufficient scope to say that burden of proof was on the sponsoring Union lo establish that M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works was a camouflage firm and actually using the name of tire said firm they not only carried on the constructional work of the plant but also engaged all workmen including the concerned workmen . It is seen that instead of establishing the said claim the sponsoring Union relied on the decision reported in 2004 LLR 911. In the said decision His Lordslip of the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court observed as follows
"CONTRACT LABOUR- Facts for establishing relationship of employer and employce-When the contract systein is sham and camouflage and only a paper work - The works , as alleged to be engaged Considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and also considering all materials on record there is no dispute to hold that M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works was given contract for construction of Froth Floatation Plant on turn -key basis. It is the allegation of the sponsoring Union that the said Firm actually is a camouflage one and the management in disguise of the
3830 GI/2004-21 368
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18. 1926
through the contractor, can seek regularisation with the principal employer- The Judgement of Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India distinguished hence not to be attracted for regularisation of such workers when the Industrial Tribunal has considered the evidence of both the parties and given the findings that the workmen were regularly running and maintaining the Froth Floatation Plant- Besides that . the Industrial Tribunal has categorically stated that the workmen were directly working under the control and supervision of the Management for running the plant commercially-In addition to that , the Management witness has stated in the evidence that the workmen were assured to be regularised in service if they got themselves registered with the Employment Exchange . Paras 14. 17 to 21. " Therefore , as per said decision of the Hon'ble High Court itisrequired to be looked into whether there existed direct relationship of employer and employee between the workers engaged through the contractor and the principal employer. If it is established that there was direct supervision and control by the principal employer over the workers of the contractor, the agreement between the principal employer and the contractor should be treated as sham , camouflage and merely a paper work .
In view of the observation of the Honb'le Court the sponsoring Union cannot avoid their responsibility to establish the facts which will lead to draw conclusion that the agreement between M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works of the management was sham , camouflage and merely a paperwork and for which the concerned workman should be considered as employees of the management .
I have discussed all points in details above and considering all aspects I find no hesitation to say excepting the claim placed in the Written Statement neither the sponsoring Union nor the concerned workman considered necessary to produce a single valid document to show that the agreement entered into between M/ s . Triveni Engineering Works and the management for construction of Froth Floatation of Plant was nothing but merely a paper work .
Accordingly, in view of my discussion above I hold that the sponsoring Union has failed to substantiate their claim and for which the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.
In the result , the following Award is rendered :-
"The demand of the Union for employment of Shri Sashi Sekhar Mahta , Ex - Site Assistant employed through Contractor by the management of Dugda Coal Washery is not justified . Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief . "
B. BISWAS . Presiding Officer
PARI 11 - SIC. 3 ( ii ) | नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 104.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आई आई सी एम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल.- 20012 /220/99- आई . आर. (सी-1 ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 9th December , 2004 S.O. 101. Inusuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 16/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Dhanbad - 11 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of 1.1.C.M. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-12-2004 .
No. L - 20012 / 220 / 99 - IR ( C - 1 ) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas . Presiding Officer .
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 REFERENCE NO . 16 OF 2000
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of 1.1.C.M.. Kanke Ranchi and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workmen : None On behalf of the employers : Mr. R.N. Ganguly. Advocate.
State : Jharkhand Industry : Coal Dated . Dhanbad, the 25th Nov. , 2004 AWARD
The Govt . of India . Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012 / 220/ 99 ( C - 1 ) . dated the 28th January, 2000 .
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the Union for regularisation of Shri Nayum Ansari and 244 other Contract labourers as per list by the mgt . of IICM is justified ? If so , to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled and from what date ? " 2. In this case neither the concerned workmen nor hisrepresentative appeared . Management , however, made appearance through their learned Advocate . In course of hearing of the instant reference the representatives of the management by furnishing a copy of order No. L- 20012/ 220/99 - IR ( C - I) , dated 31-7-2003 submitted that the instant reference is not maintainable in the eye of law. Perused also the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court . Jharkhand Ranchi in connection with L.P.A. No. 322 of 2002 ( C.W.J.C. No. 819 of 2000 ) arising out of Ref. 16/ 2000. In the said order Hon'ble High Court observed as follows :-
"Any way in the case on hand , we do not think it necessary to finally decide that question. We think that the circumstances of the case justifies the quashing ofthe impugned order of reference made by the Central Government and the remitting of the proceedings to the Central Government for a proper consideration of the question whether it is the appropriate Government under Section 10 of the I. D. Act for making a reference in the light of the ration of the decision of Supreme Court in SteelAuthority of India Casc .
In that view, we allow this appeal . set aside the judgement of learned Single Judge and allow the Writ petition by quashing the impugned notification and remit the proceeding to the Central Government for taking a fresh decision on all aspects involved including its competence within a period of four months from the receipt of copy of this Order. "
On receipt of the said order it transpires that the Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour issued a letter referred to above disclosing to the effect "The undersigned is directed to refer to the judgement dt . 9/3-4-2003 of the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LPA No. 322 of 2002 in the matter of IICM Vs. UOI and others quashing the order for adjudication dt . 28-1-2000 and setting aside judgement dated 30-4-2002 in C.W.J.C. No. 819/2000 and remitting the proceedings to the Central Govt . for taking a fresh decision in the matter .
After considering the matter in detail in the light of thejudgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of SAIL Vs. Union Water Front Workers 2001-11 - LLJ 1087-1136 SC the Central Govt . is of the opinion that Central Govt . is not the appropriate Govt . under Section 2(a) of the I. D. Act , 1947 in respect of the Indian Institute CoalManagement . Ranchi . The disputant parties . ifthey so desire may approach the concerned StateGovt. in respect of any industrial dispute .
369
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
In view of the facts disclosed in the said letter it transpires that the Central Govt . is not the appropriate Government under Section 2 (a) of the 1.D. Act 1947 in respect of Indian Insitute Coal Management . Ranchi . The disputant parties if they so desire may approach to the concerned State Govt . for industrial dispute . In view of the clear observation made by the Ministry after receipt of the order of the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court it transpires clearly that the earlier reference made by the Ministry in the instant case appears to be bad in law and is not maintainable as the dispute in question stands within the domain of the concerned State Govt .
In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I therefore hold that the instant reference case is not maintainable in the eye of law. The petitioner i.e. the sponsoring Union is at liberty to present the dispute before the concerned State Govt . for appropriate relief.
The instant reference is disposed of accordingly .
B. BISWAS . Presiding Officer नाम
पिता का नाम क्रमांक
(2)
(3)
(1)
1.
मुसतकीम अंसारी
नयुम अंसारी
2.
मंगल उरॉव
दुर्गा उरॉव
3.
राजेश तिर्की
पोढ़ह तिर्की
4.
राम कृष्ण वरवा
सुकरा वरवा
5. राहिल कुज़र
बसंत कुजूर
6.
मनोजराम
मक्कुमराम
7.
तारकेश्वर साहू देवनारायण साहु
8.
जयन्त खलखो
जतरु खलखो
9.
अनीता तिग्गा
इमिल तिग्गा
10.
मो. असलम
मो. रमजान
11.
सीलावान्डो
स्व० बन्धना वान्डो 12.
शालो कैथा
मंग कैथा
13.
ज्योति खलखां
अब्राहम तिग्गा
14.
अनुपमा लकड़ा जुलुयस लकड़ा
15 .
मीना कड़िया पति कृष्णा कर्वाड़या 16.
इन्द्रस तिग्गा
अब्राहम तिग्गा
17 .
जयंत कुजूर इंडियन मकढली कुज़र
18 .
साकिर हुसैन लेक रो जाकिर हुसैन
19.
काशीनाथ सिंह
बीर वहादुर सिंह
20. सुनीता कच्छप काड़ कच्छप 370
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18, 1926
(1)
(2)
(3) 21.
रमेशसाहु
देवनारायण साहु 22. मो. अजीज मंसूरी मो . सीराज मंसूरी 23 .
गोपाल महतो राजेन्द्र कुमार महतो
स्व. भोला महतो 24. रामसुन्दर महतो
25.
रशीद अन्सारी मो. शकील अहमद
26.
रशीद अंसारी अशरफ अंसारी
27 .
मो. रफीक मो. जमालुदीन
28 .
शकील अख्तर मकसूदअली 29.
संकर राम रंजीत कुमार
30.
प्रवेज अख्तर
हारुन रशीद
अमरनाथ महतो 31.
वैद्यनाथ महतो
अमरनाथ महतो 32.
किशन महतो
33 .
दशरथ प्रजापति राज कुमार
34.
कृष्णाठाकुर
स्व. महादेव ठाकुर 35.
सुनील कच्छप
सुधु कच्छप चन्द्रा कच्छप
जयरा कच्छप 36.
37.
धुरती मुण्डा देवेन्द्र मुण्डा
38 .
स्व. जलेश्वर महतो विजय कुमार
39.
पति महधीम महतो मुनीया तिर्की
40.
पिता अब्दुल गफार सयुमुल अंसारी
41.
जगरनाथ महतो जलेश्वर महतो 42.
पतिमो. असलम सकीनाखातून
43.
चौधरी वेरिया बालेश्वर वेरिया
44.
अपिल महतो नरेश कुमार
45. झलेन्द्र मुण्डा वैजनाथ मुण्डा 46 .
धाधु मुण्डा विष्णु मुण्डा
47.
जितलाल महतो गोरवधन महतो 48.
पति चम्पा खलखो पुष्पाखलखा
49.
रिना टोप्पो
पति एतवा टोप्पो 50.
मरवरआलम
फरजन्दअली 51.
रफीक आलम मो. समीरुदीन
52.
अशाक मुण्डा सियाराम मुण्डा 53 .
स्व. सोमरा उरॉव ववलु उरॉव
54.
मो. अख्तर
इन्सलामअली 55.
मो. अलीजान
कारु अंसारी 56 .
नागेश्वर महतो
विन्देश्वर महतो 中
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (1)
(2)
(3)
57 .
स्व. शइद अली
क्यूमअंसारी
58.
धीरेन्द्र महतो
रामनाथ महतो
59.
जगेश्वर महतो
मुन्नामहतो
60. कोलम्बस तिग्गा इमील तिग्गा
महेन्द्रराम
61.
नागेश्वर राम
62.
राजु मुण्डा
बिरसा मुण्डा
63 .
महाबीर मुण्डा
बिरसा मुण्डा
64.
मोहन उरॉव
एतवा उरॉव
65.
नरेश पासवान
जुगेश्वरपासवान
66 .
फागु मुण्डा
सनिचरवा मुण्डा
67 .
राधीका वारला पति सुंखरा मुण्डा हेलेन टोप्पो
68.
पति सुनील टोप्पो
69 . दिलीप मुण्डा चैतू मुण्डा
70 .
विजय उरॉव
सुकरा उरॉव
71.
खेदन राम ईन्दवार कृष्ण राम ईन्दवार
72.
शेख अनवर
शेख मुदीन
73.
रशीद अंसारी
मो. जाकिर हुसैन
74.
जग्गा महतो
वोधनाथ महतो
75.
रामचन्द्र मुण्डा महावीर मुण्डा
76.
रघु मुण्डा
चैतु मुण्डा
77. सोमरा मिंज
78.
मनोज
79.
जिब्रेईल अन्सारी
सुल्तान अंसारी
80.
जिब्रईल अंसारी शहामत अंसारी
81 .
दिलीप नायक
82. अनवर हुसैन
83. शिबु लिण्डा
84.
एकबाल
85.
मंगरा उरॉव
86 .
जितेन्द्र महतो
87.
फिरोज आलम
महमूद आलम
88 .
अशोक केलेय
89 .
हरि शंकर बेदिया मयाराम बेदिया
90.
कलेश्वर महतो
वलराम महतो
91.
दशमी कच्छप पति स्व. जगरनाथ मुण्डा 92.
सुरज लाल
पिता स्व. गनु लाल [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
371
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
(2)
(3) (1)
बसंत राम
93.
पिता स्व. अघुन राम 94.
पिता कैलाश लोहरा सुरेन्द्र लोहरा
95.
ललन रजक
सोनूलाल रजक 96.
हरदेव सिंह राजकुमारसिंह
97. कन्हाई बेदिया रघुवा बेदिया
स्व. राम अवतार राम 98. प्रदीप राम
स्व. राम अवतार राम 99.
संजीत राम
गोपाल राम तिर्की 100. मोनिका कुजूर
101. रोशन वारला
102.
श्रीगुलाब राम अशोक कुमार
ओम प्रकाश
103 .
महावीर साहनी 104.
रामनन्दन साहु
श्रीराम चन्द्र साहु 105 .
मरता बारला
जाकुशम बारला 106.
महोदेव महतो जलसूराम
107.
स्व. चान्दमोहम्मद मदीना खातुन
निर्मल खलखो स्व. शिलास खलखो 108.
अशोक राम
सनम राम 109.
110.
मो. करीम मो. सफरू आलम
111.
मो. आशिक
मो. हसन 112.
देवनाथ राम
नगीनाराम 113. विकास भट्टाचार्य एस.एन. भट्टाचार्य
कोतिवास शर्मा 114. मिथिलेश कुमार
115.
सरोज झा
पी.एन. झा 116.
ए.के.राय मुक्ताराय
117 .
साधना घोष
के.सी. घोष 118. पूनम टोप्पो
इमील तिर्की 119.
एम. भेंगरा सुशीला भंगरा
120.
बी.एन. तिवारी कृष्णावती तिवारी
121.
पतिशेख अनवर शबनम खातून
122.
नारायण
पी.के. विश्वास 123.
महावीर साहू राम प्रसाद साहू
124.
मो. अमीन
मो. सलाउद्दीन 125.
विनोद सिंह
राजेश सिंह 126 .
झालो देवी
खरामू मुंडा 127.
फुलमनी देवी दुर्गा कच्छप 128.
प्रमाददास
हरे कृष्ण दास (2)
(3)
(1)
129. रूपेश वर्मा
स्व. वैजनाथ वर्मा
130.
पिता बचूराम
संजय कुमार
131.
चरित्र महतो
विजय कुमार
132.
डिंलेजर खाखा
133.
चमरा यादव
शिव कुमार यादव
134.
बाबूराव
रामूराव
बिमला
135 .
136 .
सियाला सिंह
भुनेश्वर प्रसाद
137 .
तारा पदों दास
ज्योति प्रकाश दास
138. बहादुर निरोला स्व. चन्द्रबहादुर निरोला 139.
अखया बोहरा
गौरंगा बोहरा
140.
शेख मोबारक
शेख जाफर
शेख शादीर
141. शेख इस्तेशर
142.
मो. आलमखान मो. जहुर खान
143. शेख सफदर
शेख इबरार अली
144.
महेश्वर वेदिया
नुकेल वेदिया
145.
बिरसा उरॉव
भगत उरॉव
146.
बोधो महतो
दिनेश महतो
147. सोमाहोरो
सनिकाहोरो
148. नवीन लकड़ा विलियम लकड़ा
श्रीपी. पाल
149.
विजय पाल
150.
अनिल राम
151 .
राजकुमार राम
152.
दिलीप राम
153 .
रामचन्द्र महतो
154.
प्रकाश कुमार
155. राजेन्द्र टोप्पो
सिरील टोप्पो
156.
महेन्द्र टोप्पो
157. संजय कुमार
158.
इकवाल
159.
ज्योतिदास
160.
रविन्द्र नाथ रजक पिता मथन रजक
161.
पिता गंगाजनध
बुचु मांझी
162.
मिलन पतरा
पिता दुर्गापद पतरा 163. पप्पूमहतो
विजय प्रसाद राम
164 .
372
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
165. फ्रांसिस जान
201 . मिठूउरॉव मान्डूउरॉव
166 . संतोष दास
202. सुरेन्द्र कुमार बोधु पासवान
167 . सुबोध राम
203 . शांतिगाड़ी रामधनी गाड़ी
168 . दिलीप नायक
204. मो. अंबलूअंसारी मो . मंसूर अली
169 . हकीक अंसारी
205. बिरसी गाड़ी करमा लिण्डा
170 . युसुफ अंसारी
206. अरुण तिवारी के.एन. तिवारी
171. रघु प्रसाद
207 . गोपाल राम काली दास राम
172. कुमार श्रेष्ठा पिता श्री ज्ञान श्रेष्ठा
208 . तनुजा पाल श्री वी. पाल
173. दीपक पोद्दार राधा
209. ज्योति प्रकाश दास तारा पाडा दास
174. बिरसा उरॉव
175. प्रसन्न कुमार वारीक
210. बसन्त राम स्व. अगनू राम
176 . सोहराईगाड़ी मरयागा
211. जगदीश राम शिबूराम
177 . राजू उरॉव
212. किशोर भगत चिंतामनी भगत
178 . शिबूसिन्हा
213. बेलागाड़ी बुधवागाड़ी
179 . सुशील महतो
214. ओम रंजन मालकीय
180 . टेलेसफोर कल्लू
215. धनेश्वर महतो
181 . सीता देवी
216. प्रमोद कुमार बहुक प्रसाद
182. प्रतिमा देवी
217 . आनन्द कुमार
183 . फिलोमिना टोप्पो पति इगसलुस टोप्पो
184.
क्रिस्टीना खाखा
नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर , 2004
185. ललिता देवी स्व. बहादुर मुडा
186 . अन्जना कुजूर पति रखवाल कुजुर
187 . जयन्ती देवी पति संतोष केरकेता चौड़ी
188. देवन्ती कुमारी पिता श्री जयराम केरकेटा चौड़ी
189.
मंजु कुमारी
190. पुनीता देवी
हुआ था । का. आ. 105.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद ।। के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 153/98) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-12-2004 को प्राप्त 191. पुनम मिन्ज
[सं. एल.- 20012/282/97- आई. आर. (सी-1 ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव 192. करमी गाड़ी
193 .
New Delhi , the 9th December . 2004 कुवरी
194. सिंलगीगाड़ी
195 .
पुष्पा देवी
196 .
कमरु जमा
अख्तर अंसारी
197 .
सालो गाड़ी
रीढ़गाड़ी
198 . फुलमनी टोप्पो बिगन टोप्पो
S.O. 105. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 153 / 98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court . Dhanbad - II now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL . and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-12-2004 .
शांतिटोप्पो
199 . स्व. राम टोप्पो
200 . बिरसा खलखो
प्रेमती खलखो
No. L - 20012 / 282 /97 - IR ( C - 1 )| S.S. GUPTA . Under Secy.
373
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/ पौष
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer .
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 ) (d) of the 1. D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE NO . 153 OF 1998
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Colliery of M / s . BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman : Mr. R.R. Prasad .
Advocate , 18 19.20
Industrial Dispute management did not provide him employment in spite of fulfilment of all requirements on his part illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice .
As a result , he compelled to raise Industrial Dispute through sponsoring Union for conciliation which ultimately resulted in reference to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The sponsoring Union accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to provide employment to Sri Amit Kumar Ram dependent son of late Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 with effect from the date of death of her mother with other consequential reliefwhich he is entitled to get .
3. Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the Written Statement and filed on behalf of the petitioner .
Mr. D.K. Verma
Onbehalf of the employers :
Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal.
Dated , Dhanbad , the 22nd Nov .. 2004
AWARD
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/282/ 97- IR( Coal - I ), dated the 15th May, 2000 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the denial to provide employment to Shri AmitKumar Ram dependent of late Fulmoni Kamin No. 3, by the management of Govindpur Area III of M/ s. BCCL is justified ? If not , to what relief is Shri Amit Kumar Ram entitled ? "
2. The case of the petitioner according to written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf in brief is as follows :-
The sponsoring union submitted that Smt. Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 was a permanent employee of Govindpur Colliery as Shale picker . She died in harness on 5-9-1984 . leaving behind the petitioner as her son . They submitted thatas per provision of N.C. W. A. said son Amit Kumar Ram of the deceased workman is entitled to get employment on account of the death of his deceased mother and submitted application for his employment before the management supported by all relevant papers . They disclosed that in course of processing that application Personnel Manager Govindpur Colliery issued a letter dated 17-12-1987 asking him to submit attested certificates which he complied with duly but till raising of the They submitted that after the death of Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 on 5-9-1984 none of her dependent submitted any application for employment as per provision of NCWA . However, after a lapse of two years of her death i.c. in the year 1986 Amit Kumar Ram applied for his employment on compassionate ground but in course of scrutiny as they found some discrepancy in the papers submitted by him they were in doubt about the genuinity of the claimant as the son of Smt . Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 . Accordingly he was asked by the management to provide genuine documents for establishing his relationship with Smt . Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 and death certificate of the deceased employee. They alleged that in spite of giving opportunity the petitioner Amit Kumar Ram could not submit any paper showing his relationship with Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 as well as her death certificate and for which they did not get scope to consider his claim for employment on compassionate ground as per NCWA.
They disclosed that after a lapse of 10 years the sponsoring union raised the present Industrial dispute and demanded for his employment which is a stale demand and for which his claim is liable to be rejected .
4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED
"Whether the denial to provide employment to Shri Amit Kumar Ram dependent of late Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 , by the management of Govindpur Arca III of M/ s. BCCL is justified ? If not , to what relief is Shri Amit Kumar Ram entitled ?"
5. FINDING WITH REASONS
It transpires from the record that sponsoring Union with a view to substantiate their claim examined the petitioner as WW - 1 . Management on the contrary examined one witness as MW - 1 in support of their claim .
374
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) |
NCWA is a bipartite agreement between the management and workmen by which apart from fixation of wages to workmen different responsibilities and liabilities have been fixed which are to be abideed by both sides . The provision as laid down in Clause 9.4.3 of NCWA has clearly pointed out under which circumstances a dependent of the deceased's claim for employment on compassionate ground could be considered . There is no dispute to hold that the petitioner being the genuine son of Smt . Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 submitted his application for employment on compassionate ground after premature death of his mother . It was expected that management with due diligence would consider the said application for his employment within the periphery of the provision as laid down in clause 9.4.3 of NCWA . Instead of doing so they started killing time and ultimately rejected his application taking the plea that there was delay in placing the claim in question . I have already discussed above that within one year after the death of his mother the petitioner submited his application for employment . Therefore , there is no scope to say that he made inordinate delay in placing his claim. On the contrary it speaks that it was for the local management such delay was caused and for which the petitioner in no circumstances could be held responsible.
Now considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings ofboth sides and also considering evidence of WW - 1 and MW- 1 . I find no dispute to hold that Smt . Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 was a Shale picker and posted at Govindpur Colliery. It is also admitted fact that the said Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 died on 5-9-1984 . While she was in service . WW - 1 i.e. the petitioner during evidence disclosed that after the death of his mother he submitted application on 13-8-1985 for his employment on compassionate ground as per provision of N.C.W.A. He disclosed that after submitting the said application management issued a letter to him dt. 24/25-4-1986 ( Ext . W - 1 ) with direction to submit necessary papers . He submitted that in response to that direction he furnished all required papaers to the management . Thereafter management issued another letter dt . 16/ 17-12-1987 asking him to deposit death certificate of his mother duly attested by competent person (Ex. W -2 ) which he also complied with. He disclosed that after the death of his mother management released the Provident Fund and other benefit left in the account of his mother in his Savings Bank account on two occasions i.e. in the month of December , 1985 and January , 1986 to the tune of Rs. 22,346 and Rs . 7550 respectively . It is the specific allegation of the petitioner that management arbitrarily wothholding his claim for employment started killing time taking different plea and for which he had been forced to raise Industrial Dispute for his relief.
When there was no other ground for rejection of the claim of the petitioner for his employment on compassionate ground I should say that management arbitrarily violating the principle of natural justice ignored the claim of the petitioner .
Accordingly. in view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that management cannot exonerate their responsibility to provide employment to the petitioner on compassionate ground as per provision of NCWA . if he is not otherwise declared medically unfit .
In the result , the following Award is rendered :-
"The denial to provide employment to Shri Amit Kumar Ram dependent of late Fulmani Kamin No. 3. by the management of Govindpur Arca III of M/ s . BCCL is justified . Consequently Shri Amit Kumar Ram dependent of Late Fulmani Kamin No. 3 is entitled to get employment under the management if he is not otherwise declared medically unfit . "
Management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above .
B. BISWAS . Presiding Officer On the contrary it is the claim of the management that as the petitioner caused delay in submitting his petition, Headquarter rejected his claim . It is not the case of the management that for non - furnishing of the particulars the claim of the petitioner was not considered. It is seen that Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 died on 5-9-1984. The petitioner submitted his application for employment on 13-8-1985 i.e. within one year after the death of his mother Fulmoni Kamin. It is seen that the petitioner furnished all particulars as required by the management . There is also no dispute that petitioner Amit Kumar was her son . If the management was not satisfied about the death of Fulmoni Kamin and about her son they definitely would not release her Provident Fund and other benefits accrued by Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 in the Bank account of the petitioner. In spite of that fact it was the local management who killed time to refer the case of the petitioner to the Headquarter . The two letters marked as Exts . W - 1 and W -2 shows that local management took about one year eight months time to issue second letter with direction to the petitioner to furnish death certificate ofhis mother duly attested by competent person . It is really curious to note that management being satisfied absolutely about the death of Smt . Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 released her dues in favour of her son . It is not the claim of the management that the petitioner was not the genuine son . If so it is unexplained actually what circumstances led them to call for death certificate of Smt. Fulmoni Kamin No. 3 again from her son after a lapse of long period .
375 [ भाग 11- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004
application of Smt. Sundri Kamin under VRS (F ) and not giving appointment to the dependent son in law as applied for, is just and proper ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman and her dependent entitled ?"
2. The case ofthe petitioner/ workman raised by the sponsoring Union in brief is as follows :-
का. आ. 106.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा.को.को.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 310/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 20012/330/2001 - आई. आर. ( सी-1 ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
The sponsoring Union submitted that the concerned workman Smt . Sundari Kamin was a wagon loader under the management of Ramkanali Colliery who was initially appointed at East Katras Colliery on 4-10-1971 under Katras Project Area .
New Delhi , the 9th December, 2004
S.O. 106. In pursuanceance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 310/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Dhanbad -11 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-12-2004 .
[No. L -20012/330/2001 - IR(C - 1 ) ] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
It has been submitted by them that in the year 1985 management introduced VRS (F) for the female workers with a view to reduce the female workers from collieries underM/s . BCCL for mining purposes with the conditions thatemployment of their male dependent will be provided in their place after acceptance of V.R. They submitted that in the year 1992 management launched similar scheme and in response to that scheme the concerned workman i.e. Smt . Sundari Kamin tendered her resignation and submitted application form duly prescribed under the said scheme alongwith other relevant documents and certificate as required in support of her application for sponsoring employment to her son- in -law i.e. the petition Rajesh Das who was solely dependent on her within prescribed time and under the age limit .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :
Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer.
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE NO . 310 OF 2001
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Katras Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman Mr. S. N. Goswami ,
Advocate .
On behalf of the employers : Mr. U. N. Lall .
Advocate.
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated . Dhanbad , the 22nd Nov. , 2004
AWARD
The concerned workman applied for her resignation under VRS (F) in the year 1992 owing to her ill health and also with a view to provide employment to her son- in -law Rajesh Kumar. It has been disclosed that during course of verification as the requisite submitted by her found correct she was called for interview vide Ref. No. BCCL / KPA/PD / 93/F - VRS ( F ) /96dt . 13-1-1993 and in response to that letter she attended the said interview on 16-1-1993 and her application under VRS ( F ) was accepted. During said interview the concerned workman made it clear that her husband who also was an employee under the management died on 4-3-1992 at Central Hospital Dhanbad leaving behind her as his widow and for married daughters out of which youngest daughter Geeta Kumari and her husband Rajesdh Kumar would live with them being their dependant. She also submitted affidavit sworn by her three son - in -laws viż . Ramswarup Dashusband of Chinta Devi , Anis Das husband of Sumitra Devi and Bhim Das husband of Sita Devi about raising no objection of her youngest son- in - law Rajesh Kumar was provided with employment under the said scheme .
The Govt . of India . Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the 1.D. Act . 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.
L-20012330 2001 dated 29th November. 2001 .
SCHEDULE
It has been alleged that in spite of the said interview and furnishing all requisite documents to the satisfaction of the management they without showing any reason left her case pending . It has been further alleged that in spite of submitting several representations to consider the claim of the concerned workman management did not give any "Whether the action of the management of M/ s. BCCL Kustore Area in not accepting the
3830 GI /2004-22 376
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
consider if the petitioner is entitled to get any relief or not.
There is no dispute to hold that said Smt. Sundari Kamingot her appointment on 4-10-1971 at Katras Project Area and thereafter posted at Katras Chaitudih Colliery and lastly posted at Ramkanali Colliery under Katras Area No. IV.
importance to the same , Actually they neither confirmed the acceptance of her application under the said scheme nor was allowed to retire herself from her service . On the contrary she was forced to continue in service depriving her to get the benefit of the said scheme illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice and for which she had been compelled to raise Industrial Dispute for her relief.
Accordinglyprayer has been made for passing award directing the management to provide employment to Rajesh Kumar accepting the V.R. of the concerned workman.
It is also admitted fact that in the year 1992 management issued circular of V.R.S. (F) inviting applications from the female workers who desires to retire herself from the service of the company voluntarily and in her place intend to promote employment of any of her dependent.
3.Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union agitated in raising industrial dispute and the facts which have been ventilated in the Written Statement submitted to that effect .
It is the contenton of the sponsoring union that Smt . Sundari Kamin in response to that call of the management submitted her resignation to the management for its acceptance and sponsored the name of her son- in - law Rajesh Das i.e. the substituted petitioner for his employment and to that effect she submitted all relevant papers.
They submitted that the concerned workman was a wagon loader at Katras Colliery and applied for V.R.S. (F) and alongwith the same submitted application for employment of her son - in -law Rajesh Das. As the said application was not in proper form they by letter No. BCCL /KPA/PD / 93/ F - VRS ( F) / 96 dt . 13-1-1993 asked her for an interview on 16-1-1993 . They disclosed that as there was discrepancy in her application the same could not be processed and forwarded to Headquarter for acceptance ofher V.R. and also for providing employment to her son- in - law . They submitted that the application for employment under VRS ( F) was incomplete as the same was not properly filled up and other conditions such as no objection from other son - in - laws were submitted and for all these reasons her case could not be considered . They submitted that there was not fault on their part but fault was on the part of the concerned workman and in spite of giving opportunity to rectify those faults as she did not do so her claim was not considered and for that reason there is no scope to say that her claim was ignored illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice . Accordingly, they submitted prayer to pass award rejecting her claim .
4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED
"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . BCCL Kustore Area in not accepting the application of Smt . Sundri Kamin under VRS ( F ) and not giving appointmentto the dependent son - in - law as applied for. is just and proper ? If not . to what relief is the concerned workman and her dependent entitled ? "
5. FINDING WITH REASONS
It transpires from the record that excepting reliance of some documentary evidence neither the sponsoring 'union nor the management adduced any oral evidence with a viewto substantiate their respective claim .
It isfurther contention of the sponsoring union that Smt . Sundari Kamin opting the scheme of V.R.S. (F ) introduced by the management submitted her resignation on the ground of her health and in her place sponsored the name of her son - in - law Rajesh Das for his employment . It is seen that Smt . Sundari Kamin was posted at Katras Choitudih Colliery while she submitted her resignation under VRS ( F ) Scheme but in course of pendency of the disposal of her claim she was transferred to Ramkanali Colliery . The letterdt . 13-1-1993 marked as Ext . M - 1 / 2 and Ext. W- 1 / 1 has exposed clearly that Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, Katras Project Area asked Smt. Sundari Kamin to appear before interview on 16-1-1993 in view of application submitted by her under VRS ( F ) Scheme . After that interview management vide letter dt . 17-3-1993 Ext. M - 1 directed her to furnish the requisite particulars as mentioned in the same . It is the contention of the sponsoring union that long before issuance of that letter Smt . Sundari Kamin submitted her declaration not only but also sworn affidavit wherein she requested the management to provide employment to her son- in - law Rajesh Das i.c. the present petitioner accepting her resignation . The letter written by Smt . Sundari Kamin addressed to the management Ext. M- 1 / 1 and W - 1/4 definitely has supported her claim. It further transpires that she also submitted full particulars of her son - in - law for his employment when his name was sponsored by her . Ext . W-1/ 5 . Even after her interview on 16-1-1993 she submitted affidavit wherein she assigned reason why the name of Rajesh Das husband of her youngest daughter Geeta Kumari was sponsored for his employment . It is the specific allegation of the sponsoring union that management neither communicated her about rejection of the prayer not its acceptance . They disclosed that they Now considering the facts disclosed in the pleadings of both sides and also documentary evidence let me [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
had been compelled to raise industrial dispute for relief only for the harassing attitude of the management .
Ld . Advocate for the management in course of hearing submitted that the claim of the concerned workman could not be considered as she did not submit application properly. If this submission of the Ld . Advocate for the management is taken into consideration the question which will crop up is why they called for interview of Smt . Sundari Kamin on 16-1-1993 by letter dated 13-1-1993 Ext . M- 1/ 1 and further why they asked her to furnish the required particulars through letter marked as Ext . W- 1/3 . Further contention of Ld . Advocate for the management is that the management could not consider that claim as female V.R.S. Scheme has been suspended . The said decision of suspension was taken in view of discussions held on 7-12-1992 . At the time of discussion in the meeting of the management on 7-12-1992, Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, Katras Area (Ext . M - 1 /3 ) was very much present . Therefore , said Dy. Chief Personnel Manager was very much aware of this fact, but it is really funny thing to note that Dy. Chief Personnel Manager, Katras Project Area called for interview of Smt . Sundari Kamin by letterdt . 13-1-2003 Ext. M - 1 /2 and subsequent letter dt . 17-2-2003 Ext . W- 1/3 . Therefore, conduct of the management will expose clearly that management did not issue any order of suspension in respect of the VRS ( F) Scheme introduced by thenm in response to which Smt . Sundari Kamin submitted application for acceptance of her resignation sponsoring the name of her youngest son - in - law Rajesh Das for his employment .
The plea taken by the management why the concerned lady did not disclose the nanie of her four daughters in the service record cannot be considered as a ground for ignoring her claim . The management I suppose have their own machinery to enquire into the genuinity of her claim but without doing so with a view to exonerate their liability in a most arbitrary way neither rejected nor accepted the claim in question .
It is admitted fact that management introduced V.R.S. ( F) specially for the female workers with the out- look to reduce female workers from their collieries for the mining purposes introducing Miner/Loader in underground mines operation to increase productions with the conditions that employment of their dependants to be absorbed in the colliery in their places who intends to retire herself from the service subject to fulfilment of the terms and conditions .
It is seen that Smt . Sundari Kamin Wagon Loader in response to that scheme submitted her application for acceptance of her resignation sponsoring the name of her youngest daughter- in -law Rajesh Das for his employment in her place who was solely dependant on her. She submitted her resignation on the ground of her ill health . From the death certificate Ext . W- 1 / 14 it is exposed that
377
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
Smt. Sundari Kamin was a patient of Carcinoma and she died on 11-4-2004. The death certificate accordingly speaks that as she was a cancer patient it was not possible on her part to render proper service to the management to upkeep the productions. Her such serious ailment speaks clearly why she submitted application for acceptance of her resignation sponsoring the name of her youngest son- in- law for his employment who was physically competent enough to render proper service to the management in upkeeping.
No evidence on the part of the management is forthcoming to show which terms and conditions the said lady has failed to fulfil for acceptance of her resignation which she tendered . On the contrary by swearing affidavit she has made all the points clear. It is seen that in spite of submitting affidavit the management did not consider necessary to communicate their decisions to that lady worker . On the contrary they allowed to kill time. It is clear that as the concerned lady worker was a patient of cancer it was not possible on her part to render proper service to the management but in spite of such fact they ignored her claim which definitely stood in the way of VR.S. ( F) introduced by them . 1 consider that it was absolute duty of the management to communicate the decisions to the concerned lady worker about the fate of the application which she submitted but instead of doing so they killed time and ultimately she succumbed to her ailment.
Such acts on the part of the management I should say was absolutely arbitrary and against the principle of natural justice . As the concerned lady worker is no more in the world there is no reason to close the chapter for the whimsical acts of the management. Slie actually was deprived to get proper justice from the management . Accordingly, in view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that petitioner Rajesh Das , son- in- law of Smt. Sundari Kamin is entitled to get employment if he is not declared medically unfit for the interest of justice.
In the result , the following Award is rendered :-
"The action of the management of M/s . BCCL Kustore Arca in not acccepting the application of Smt . Sundari Kamin under VRS ( F) and not giving appointmentto the dependent son - in- law as applicd for is not just and proper. Consequently, the dependent son - in- law of Sundari Kamin is entitled to get employment under the management subject to his physical fitness ."
The management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above .
B. BISWAS . Presiding Officer 378
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18. 1926
PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) | नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2004
the year 2000. It seems Second Party is not interested in prosecuting his case . I therefore have no alternative but to dispose of the reference for want of prosecution and pass the following order :
ORDER
1. Reference is hereby disposed of for want of prosecution by SP.
का. आ. 107.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, पुणे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 453/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
2. No order as to costs .
Place : PUNE
P.E. HAVAL , Presiding Officer [सं. एल.-12012/25/2000- आई . आर. ( बी. - 11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
Date : 12-8-2004
New Delhi , the 9th December, 2004
नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004
S.O. 107. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 453/ 2000 ) of the Labour Court , Pune (Maharashtra ) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank , and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on (09-12-2004 .
का. आ. 108.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय , पुणे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 542/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[No. L - 12012 /25/ 2000 - IR ( B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
[सं. एल.-12012/79/2000- आई. आर. ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव ANNEXURE
New Delhi , the 9th December, 2004 BEFORE SHRI . P. E. HAVAL , PRESIDING OFFICER, II LABOUR COURT, PUNE
Reference ( IDA) 153/2000
The Divisional Manager, UCO Bank Opp. Sangam Press Kothrud , Pune (Maharashtra ) -411029 .
-1 Party
AND
S.O. 108. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 542/ 2000 ) of the Labour Court . Pune ( Maharashtra ) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012 / 79 /2000 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
-II Party
Shri . R. P. Kasbe Plot No. 59. Shahunagar, Kedgaon Deviche . Ahmednagar
ANNEXURE
AWARD
(DATED : 12-8-2004)
BEFORE SHRI . P. E. HAVAL , PRESIDING OFFICER, II LABOUR COURT , PUNE
Reference ( IDA) 542/2000
1. This is a reference made by Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Pune u/ s 10 ( 1 ) and 12 ( 5 ) read with Sec - 2 - A of the I.D.A. for adjudication of the industrial dispute between The Divisional Manager , UCO Bank (hereinafter referred to as First Party) and R P Kasbe , workman (hereinafter referred to as Second Party) mentioned in the Schedule which reads as under :
The Chief Manager ( Admn. ) BOM Bank of Maharashtra Bharti Vidyapeeth Bhavan , 13 , Sadashiv Peth , Pune Pune-30
-I Party SCHEDULE
AND
"Mr. R. P. Kasbe should be reinstated with full back wages with continuity of service w.e.f. 22-11-93 " .
Shri . Vishnu B. Kadam 1216 , Patil Bungalow D.G. , Pune-4
-11 Party
Coram : Shri . P.E. Hayal
2. Second Party appeared through Advocate Mhaske in pursuance of notice but Second Party failed to file his statement of claim , although the reference is of भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
APPEARANCES :
None for I Party
Shri . Vipradas , Advocate for II Party
(DATED : 17-9-2004)
379 several labour laws including ID Act , 1947 is applicable to First Party. The First Party is an industry as defined under section 2 (j ) of ID Act , 1947. The Second Party is a workman as defined under section 2( s) of ID Act , 1947 and service conditions of Second Party are covered as per Shastry Award and Bipartite Settlement .
AWARD
(Dictated in Open Court)
1. This is a reference made by Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Pune u/ s 10( 1 ) and 12 (5 ) read with Sec- 2 -A of the I.D. Act for adjudication of the industrial dispute between Bank of Maharashtra, employer (hereinafter referred to as First Party) and V. B. Kadam , employee (hereinafter referred to as Second Party) mentioned in the Schedule which reads as under :
SCHEDULE
"Mr. V. B. Kadam should be reinstated with full back wages with continuity of service w.e.f. 15-11-89 " .
2. Notices were issued to the parties . Shri . V. B. Kadam filed his statement of claim at Exh . 8. Adv. Vipradas appeared for Second Party by filing his Vakalatnama Exh . 6. Notice of hearing was also issued to employer Bank of Maharashtra in addition to notice to file written statement . Both the notices were served on employer Bank of Maharashtra . Employer Bank of Maharashtra did not appear nor filed any written statement and hence the matter proceeded ex parte against the Bank vide order dt . 19-10-2001 . Thereafter, workman Vishnu Kadam filed his affidavit as Exh . 8 stating therein as under:
" 1. The Second Party submits that carlier to aforesaid order dt . 29-9-2001 of adjudication there were conciliation proceedings before Asst. Labour Commissioner ( Central ) who intervened in the dispute and made recommendations in favour of the workman . However, the Management of the First Party was obstinate and raised fictitious contentions denying the claim and contentions of the workman , consequent to which this dispute was referredto this Hon'ble Court for adjudication as required by the provisions of ID Act, 1947 .
2. The Second Party submits that First Party is a Banking Company registered under the Companies Act and having its Head Office at Lokmangal Karyalaya . Shivajinagar. Punc and having one of its administration office at Bharati Vidyapeeth Bhavan . 13 Sadashiv Peth , Pune -30 . The First Party is carrying on its business of banking throughout India including Pune District in Maharashtra and 3. The workman was appointed as peon on 1-12-67 in the Bank . Thereafter due to satisfactory work he was appointed as sub- staff pcon (Daftari ) on 1-6-98 at Aundh Branch . Pune of the Bank . The workman was doing work of keeping and maintaining record . sorting the daily vouchers and stitching them properly of the Aundh Branch of the Bank . The workman was in the employment of the Bank at its Aundh Branch from 1-6-67 to 15-11-89 . During his employment . workman's work was satisfactory . Workman's service record was clean and he was not issued any memo ,, warning letter or chargesheet . The workman has received regular increments all allowances . The workman has put in 21 years service in the Bank . The First Party Bank has terminated his services on 15-11-89 and at that time, his last drawn salary was Rs . 5500p.m .
4. The Second party submits that due to his wife illness in the year 1988 he was required to attend to his wife and hence he could not attend his dutics during illness period of his wife . There was dispute between the workman and then Branch Manager of Aundh Branch . Pune about workman absenteeism . The workman due to his genuine valid reasons was required to stay at home and there was no intention not to attend his duties . Then Branch Manager has waited to involve the workman and to teach him a lesson for arguing with the Branch Manager The First party has issued chargesheet.dt . 22-10-88 on the basis of allegations of the Banks Branch Manager .
5. The Second party submits that the person who has issued chargesheetdt. 12-10-88 and termination letter dt . 15-11-89 has no authority and power to issue the same . The said chargesheet and termination letter are not legal proper. valid in law and the same is liable to be set aside and the workman is entitled for the reinstatement and full back wages .
6. The Second party denies allegations in both the chargesheets dt . 29-4-88 and 22-10-88 . The First Party Bank has started departmental 380
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] enquiry against the workman. The workman was also suspended pending enquiry. Copy of enquiry officer's findings was not given to the workman and no opportunity was given to him to give his say, to show how findings are perverse and how charges are not proved against the workman .
any opportunity to cross - examine the witness of the Bank . The Bank has led . evidence about the charges which were not stated in the chargesheet and hence the workman was caught unaware about the charges and hence it amounts to denial of opportunity.
7. The chargesheet dt . 22-10-88 is not legal , proper and all the allegations are denied by the Second Party. The enquiry enacted against the workman is not tenable in law and liable to be set aside on following grounds :
(e) The dates of enquiry were not communicated to the workman in time and hence no opportunity to the workman given to participate in the enquiry to defend his case.Hence ex parte enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer . The workman was not givenany opportunity to cross - examine the witness and put forward his case properly.
( a) The Bank has appointed one Shri Hendre for holding an enquiry, who is a regular Enquiry Officer of the Bank and have vast experience of Labour laws.
(b) The workman was suspended pending enquiry and pending enquiry First Party has not paid subsistence allowance to the workman . The Bank and Enquiry Officer purposely prolonged the enquiry to enquire that out of financial shutterings workman gives up and surrender to the Branch Manager of the Bank. Non -payment of subsistance allowance also amounts to violation of principles of natural justice.
(c) Chargesheet is dt . 22-10-88 and the Bank started enquiry on 12-11-88 and completed on 11-7-89 . Ex - parte evidence of Bank witness was recorded by the Enquiry Officer and during the pendency of enquiry. First Party has made corrigendum dt . 17-6-89 to the chargesheetdt . 22-10-88 at the instance of Disciplinary Authority. The Second Party was not given any opportunity to put up his say nor show cause notice was given to him before awarding punishment .
(f) On perusal of chargesheet , it can be seen that such charges can be made against any person . The workman is not concerned with such charges . It was the responsibility ofthe ledger clerk, passing officer, cashier to take care while making payments and when the payment is made it is presumed that they have taken all the precautions while making payments to the concerned saving account holders . The Second Party has no concern about counter work as he was given separate room to work as Daftari . The Second Party has not withdrawn any amount from Account No. 767 of Shri Hulawale . Mr. Gurav and Clerk Kale who were responsible for payment to Shri Hulawale has taken false statement from Shri Hulawale . There is no evidence on record to prove that the workman has withdrawn the amounts from Mr. Hulawale's account . The Second Party has not signed the withdrawal slip . Similarly Mr. Anand Tukaram Rakshe having S/ A No. 11290. The withdrawal slips are not signed by the workman and payment in "withdrawal slips is made only when it is all corroborated by pass book and signed by the party and cashier has made payments which itself proves that the payment is made to the account holder . In respect ofAccount No. 9387 of Shri Gulab S. Rakshe the withdrawal slip is not signed by the workman. It bears thumb impression and Mr. Murkute has attested the same . Hence , Murkute with collusion with cashier and Branch Manager made false allegations against the Second Party. Hence all the charges are not proved in the enquiry and findings of Enquiry Officer are perverse .
( d) The Bank has not given relevant documents , statement of witness reports of Bank Officers etc. to the workman alongwith the chargesheet to enable him to defend the charges . The workman was not given inspection of voucher report . original documents , statement of witnesses etc. Enquiry Officer has taken on record xerox copies of documents without seeing the original documents and hence there was a collusion between Enquiry Officer and the Bank in taking documents on record and Enquiry Officer was a tool in the hands of the Bank and he was appointed to give findings in favour of the Bank . The Enquiry Officer has not given 381 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18, 1926
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR
PRESENT :
Shri E. Ismail , Presiding Officer
Case No : C.G.I.T./NGP/32/2003 8. The Second Party therefore prays that dismissal from the Bank service on 15-11-89 may be declared as illegal , improper and be quashed and set aside . Further he should be reinstated with continuity of service with full back wages , increments , Bonus , Differerice of DA , Employers ' PF contribution etc. and all other intermediate monetary benefits which he would have earned if in employment . "
Date : 15-09-2004
Shri N. M. Kale-Petitioner Vs.
3. 1 have no reason to disbelieve the contents of affidavit ofworkman Vishnu Kadam at Exh . 8. I, therefore , proceed to pass following order:
ORDER
The Asstt. General Manager Corpa . Bank-Respondent AWARD
1. It is hereby declared that termination of services of Shri . Vishnu B. Kadam w.e.f. 15-11-89 is illegal and unjust.
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub Section ( 1 ) and Sub Section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute for adjudication vide order No. L- 12011 /205/ 2002 /IR (B- II) dt . 27-01-2003 on following schedule .
2. The First Party Bank of Maharashtra is therefore hereby directed to reinstate workman Vishnu B. Kadam with continuity of service and with full back wages w.e.f. 15-11-89 .
This is a reference by Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour which reads as follows :-
3. No order as to costs .
Place : Pune
P. E. HAVAL , Presiding Officer
Date : 17-9-2004
नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2004
"Whether the action of the management of Corporation Bank through its Assistant General Manager , Mumbai and the Branch Manager , Nagpur in terminating the services of the workman Shri N. M. Kale , Ex Sub - staff w.e.f. 29-07-2000 is legal ? If not , what relief the said workman is entitled to ?"
का. आ. 109.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कॉरपोरेशन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 32/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The petitioner filed Statement of Claim and documents . The case was posted today for Written Statement anddocuments . When a compromise petition was filed . Union representative Shri Rajendra Phase , the affected employee Shri N. M. Kale , Shri M. Satyanarayana , Senior Manager of the bank and his counsel present and signed and admitted before me the terms of compromise .
[सं. एल-12011/205/2002- आई. आर. ( बी.- II ) ] . सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
An award is passed in terms of compromise as follows : -
New Delhi , the 9th December , 2004
The workman Shri N. M. Kale shall be appointed as a Peon at one of the branches at Nagpur. He will not be entitled to the former service for any benefit or back wages .
Award passed as above . Transmit .
E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer
( 1) Witness for petitioner-Nil.
S.O. 109. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 32/2003 ) of the Central Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Corporation Bank and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 09-12-2004 .
(2) Witness for respondent-Nil .
(3) Exhibits for petitioner- Nil .
[No. L - 12011 / 205/ 2002 - IR( B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
(4) Exhibits for respondent-Nil .
382
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
"Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank in terminating the services of Shri Shantu Kumar on 9-4-1997 is legal and justified ? If not , what relief is he entitled to ?"
का. आ. 110.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यू.को. बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, पटना के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या 6 (c) /2003 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011 / 3/ 2002- आई . आर. ( बी.- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004
S.O. 110. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [Ref. No. 6 ( c)/ 2003 ] of the Industrial Tribunal , PATNA ( BIHAR) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004.
[No. L- 12011 /3 /2002 - IR(B - II ) | C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , PATNA
Reference No. 6 ( c) of 2003
2. Both parties have filed their written statement and contested the reference . Worker's case , in short , that he was orally appointed by the Divisional Manager, UCO Bank , Patna to discharge the duties of a peon from 3-11-86 at Divisional Office , Patna . He used to perform all the works of peon throughout the day. He was initially given Rs . 10 per day which was raised from time to time and lastly Rs . 80 per day. It is further mentioned in his Written Statement that a settlement was arrived at between the management of UCO Bank ( for short " Management " ) and workmen's Union , whereunder all daily rated workers who had worked for 240 days in between 12-10-86 to 12-10-89 were to be permanently absorbed . The workers submitted an application under said Scheme for his permanent absorption but that was not considered by the management resulting in a dispute before C.G.I.T. , Dhanbad for his regularisation. While the dispute was still pending the worker was terminated from service from 9-4-1997 . Hence , the present reference for adjudication whether management's action in terminating worker's from services is legal and justified . The worker has challenged management's action for violating the provisions of Sec . 25F and 33 of the Act and also unfair labour practices . Prayer has been accordingly made for worker's regularisation in terms of settlement above referred and reinstatement with back wages .
Management of UCO Bank . Regional Office , Maurya Lok Complex. A-Block , 4th Floor , Patna (Bihar ) and their workman represented by the State Secretary. UCO Bank Employees Association. C / o UCO Bank . Exhibition Road . Patna ( Bihar) .
For the Management : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee . A.C.O ..
UCO Bank .
For the Workman : Sri B. Prasad . State Secretary. UCO Bank, Employees
Association . Patna .
PRESENT :
Priya Saran , Presiding Officer. Industrial Tribunal . Patna.
AWARD Patna , dated the 9th December, 2004
3. The management has , inter alia, stated in the W.S. that worker's engagement on 3-11-86 on daily wages for doing some works of contingent nature was ab initio void and nullity as the Divisional Manager had no such authority and no person could be appointed without undergoing legal process and formalities made therefor. The worker was engaged on daily wages for the works of Water Boy against a non - existent post . He was never engaged to work as a peon . The R.B.I. also had placed restrictions on the Bank against making fresh appointment . It is further mentioned in the W. S. that as per terms of settlement a Water Boy on daily wages was not cligible for empanelment and so . the worker being a Water Boy could not have such clainı and was hence not empanelled. His entire engagement by an incompetent person against a non - existent post being a nullity, he was rightly disengaged or terminated with effect from 9-4-1997 . The worker does not come under the definition of a worker nor can claim any benefit u /s . 25F of the Act . The management in the facts and circumstances as above has prayed to disallow worker's claim .
By adjudication order No. L - 12011 / 3/ 2002 - IR (B - 11 ) dated 03-05-2002 the Government of India , Ministry of Labour. New Delhi has referred under Clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( hereinafter to be referred to as the Act ) , the following dispute between the management of UCO Bank . Regional Office . Maurya Lok Complex . A - Block . Patna and their workman Shri Shantu Kumar for adjudication to this Tribunal :
4. The basic question before us is whether the worker is entitled to the benefit under settlement dated 19-10-1989 ( Ext . W/3 ) which is an admitted document .
[भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]
The document envisages that persons engaged on daily wage basis were to be empanelled and absorbed by the Bank who are engaged as casual workers for full days work for 240 days or more during a period of three years immediately preceding settlement, but one engaged as a Water Boy was not eligible for such consideration.
5. Engagement of the worker in the Bank has not been denied by the management, but according to them he was engaged as a Water Boy on daily wages on 3-11-86 and remained in the Bank as such till 8-4-97 . The management's claim is that he never performed peon's work nor was engaged as such and so, his case is not covered by 1989 settlement. His claim for empanelment and absorption was hence not entertained by the management .
6. Let us now see what is the evidence on record for coming to a decision in this case . Management has examined two witnesses besides filing some documents to prove their stand. Both their witnesses namely MWI Sri Sahadeo Pd . Ambasta and MW2 Sri Anil Kumar are Bank Officials. MW1 says that the worker is a loanee and has taken a loan of Rs . 2000 on 31-3-87 for tea shop which is still outstanding . According to MW2 , the worker was running his tea stall at Divisional Office . Patna and had taken a loan from Kankarbagh Branch. Besides above , he also served Water to the staff members as a Water Boy.
7. Ext. M is worker's loan application and Ext . M/ 6 is a Certificate under the signature of Senior Manager that said loan is still outstanding . Factum of Loan is not disputed by the worker . He as WWI , has rather accepted with open heart in para 7 of his deposition that he applied for loan at the advice of one Bank Official as he was a need of money for his father's treatment . Moreover, this fact is not in issue before us . All the more , it is not the case of the Bank nor this has been established by evidence that a worker is not entitled to loan . Management's other documents are M/ 1-General Manager's letter dated 28-4-97 noting prohibition to engagement of casual worker , M/ 2-Kolkata High Court decision in WP No. 1390/98 , M/ 3- list of candidates absorbed after empanelment , M/4- Worker's withdrawal petition of Misc . Case No. 2/98 and M/ 5 - MOU between the management and the Union on Bank's three years revival Plan . None of these documents are helpful to the management so far facts and circumstances of the case are concerned . Worker's representative rather informed at the time of argument that some restrictions were imposed by R.B.1. when Bank's financial position was badbut the situation has now since changed and the Bank isrunning in huge profit . Annual report 2002-2003 was also placed before me in support of his submission .
3830 Gl/2004-23
383
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
8. Worker on the other hand , has examined three witnesses namely WWI Shantu Kumar worker himself. WW2Manvendra Choudhary and WW3 Ajay Chatterjee . The worker has also filed some documents which are marked as Exts . W to W/8 .
9. WWI has spoken at length to categorically support his case that he worked and discharged duties as a peon at the Divisional Office of UCO Bank , Patna from 3-11-86 to 8-4-97 . Initially, he was given Rs . 10 per day which was raised to Rs . 80 per day at last . He submitted hisapplication (Ext . W) for his regularisation under the agreement ( Ext . W/3 ) . He was , however, not empanelled nor regularised by the Bank . About 200 persons of the empanelled workers have been regularised. During cross- examination , he says that he had worked for 240 days in a year preceding his termination.
10. WW2 is a retired officer of the Bank , and WW3 works in Regional Office of the Bank , WWI makes a specific statement that the worker was appointed on daily wages and he worked at Divisional Office , Patna from 1986 till the witness retired on 1-2-93 . The management utilised his services as a pcon . He submitted an application for his regularisation under the agreement which was processed by WW2 . He prepared details of work done by the worker ( Ext . W/ 1 ) and the details of statements sent toHeadOffice for empanelment and absorption ( Ext . W/ 2) . Ext. W/ 1 indicates that the worker had performed his job for many more days than 240 days and Ext . W/2 shows that he performed all types ofjob including peon's job for over one thousand days from 12-10-86 onwards till the statement was prepared i.e.22-12-89 . These two documents goto establish clearly that the worker's services were utilised by the management to perform all types of job including those of pen's work and he regularly rendered his services , and his case appears well covered under 1989 settlement .
11 WW3 also supports worker's case in full . He categorically states that he regularly worked from 3-11-86 to 8-4-97 at the Divisional Office throughout office hours and discharged all the works of a peon . He further says that while an Industrial dispute was going on regarding his regularisation before Tribunal . he was terminated from service .
12. Categorical statements made by the worker's witnesses coupled with Exts . W/ 1 and W/ 2 take us to irresistible conclusion that the worker was orally appointed by the management and he discharged all the works of a peon from 3-11-1986 to 8-4-1997 . Management's contention that worker's initial appointment was illegal and void and did not confer any right upon him to take shelter of Sec . 25F of the Act appears to be totally 384
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8. 2005 / PAUSA 18. 1926
misconceived as question of illegal and invalid appointment can not be imported in a reference made under I.D. Act . " Workman " is defined under Sec . 2 ( S ) of the Act and says that any person including an apprentice doing any manual , unskilled , skilled , technical . operational , Clerical or Supervisory work for hire or reward would qualify as a workman notwithstanding whether the contract of employment was express or implied . As the worker qualifies as a workman u / s . 2 ( S ) the benefit u/ s . 25F is automatically attracted to him provided he has been in continuous service for 240 days in a calendar year . The evidence on record clearly shows that the worker competes for the benefits u/ s . 25F of the Act . This is one aspect of the case . In the present case . the guiding document is Ext . W/ 3 , which is a settlement arrived at between the parties, where under a casual worker was to be empanelled and absorbed provided he has completed at least 240 days work during last three years preceding settlement . Ext. W/ 1 is a Bank's document and it clearly shows that the worker was qualified for empanelment and absorption under the settlement . I have no hesitation to come to a finding on the basis of evidence before us that the worker was well entitled for consideration and empanelment followed by absorption in terms of settlement . Bank's plea that he being a Water Boy was not eligible for consideration does not get support from evidence . We have seen that there is no evidence worth the name to suggest that the worker's engagement was exclusively as a Water Boy.
13. Ext. W/4 is a letter from the Head Office to the Divisional Manager pointing towards discrepancies regarding some candidates including that of worker for considering his case for absorption . The Head Office required only details of date - wise breakup of the work done by worker . This document does not indicate that worker's case could not be considered for his being ineligible under the agreement . Ext. W/ 5 is an order dated 31-7-1997 in Complaint 2 of 1997 whereby C.G.I.T.. Dhanbad issued a direction to the management to maintain status quo till the disposal of case . Ext . W/ 6 is worker's petition to Regional Manager . Patna for reinstatement in view of above order . Ext . W / 7 is notice to parties issued by A.L.C. ( Central ) . Patna in a conciliation proceeding and W/ 8 is a list of 22 persons who according to the worker have been absorbed in regular service . These documents are not of much importance for the decision of present reference .
14. To sum up the evidence on record appears to be almost conclusive to suggest that the worker was orally appointed by the Divisional Manager . UCO Bank . Patna and the management went on utilising his services as a peon continuously from 3-11-86 to 8-4-1997 i.e. for over
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] ten years . It is quite suprising to note that worker's application was not considered for empanelment or absorption in terms of 1989 settlement although he was well qualified for consideration . The evidence is clear on the point that he had been a workman u/ s . 2 ( S ) of the Act and accordingly . it was obligatory on the part of the management to have complied with the provisions of Sec . 25F of the Act before termination or retrenchment . The management has definitely violated the provisions of Sec . 25F and worker's case has got to be upheld .
15. In the result . I find and hold accordingly, in view of discussion aforesaid on materials on record that the action of the management of UCO Bank in terminating the services of worker Shri Shantu Kumar on 9-4-97 is quite illegal and unjustified and he is entitled to re- instatement with back wages at the rate he was last paid . The management is accordingly directed to reinstate the worker Shantu Kumar from the date he was disengaged/ retrenched with back wages as indicated above . The management is further directed to absorb him and regularise his services as a regular staff from the date he joins the Bank . The management is further directed to comply the order within two months of notification of the Award.
16. Award accordingly .
PRIYA SARAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर , 2004
का. आ. 111.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं . -2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं . एल.- 12012/ 226/95- आई. आर. ( बी. - 11) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 111. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 42/96 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court . No. 2. New Delhi as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank . and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[ No. L - 12012/ 226 / 95 - IR ( B - II ) ] C. GANGADHARAN . Under Secy .
385 [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDERA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI
I.D. NO . 42/96
R. N. Rai . Presiding Officer
In the matter of :
Smt . Pushp Lata Sethi , Through The Secretary.
Syndicate Bank Staff Association, Ram Naresh Bhawan , Tilak Gali , Pahar Ganj , New Delhi - 110055 .
Narela Branch since 14th April, 1986. While working as such, on 14th May, 1990 , the workman was entrusted with and was performing the duties of Receipt Cashier , receiving cash pertaining to S.B. , O.D. and deposit accounts in the Cash Cabin in the ground floor of the branch premises . The workman comınitted willful insubordination by refusing to transfer funds to payment cashier and also refused to make direct payments to customers thereby causing inconvenience to the customers and also to the normal functioning of the branch on 14th May, 1990. The workman was placed under suspension by the Manager , Narela Branch vide letter dt . 14th May, 1990. It is denied that the action of the Branch Manager of Narela Branch in issuing suspension letter or that the disciplinary authority ratifying the said action was bad in law or that the disciplinary proccedings against the workman were void ab - initio . The allegations are false .
VERSUS
The Asstt. General Manager, Syndicate Bank , 6 , Bhagwan Dass Road , New Delhi - 110002.
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 226/95 - IR ( B - 2 ) Central Government Dated 26-03-1996 has referred the following point for adjudication.
The point runs as hereunder :
That it is not denied that the workman was served with a chargesheetdt. 22nd May, 1990 under para 19.05 ( e ) of B.P.S. 1966 for her act of willful insubordination as per the charge mentioned therein . The act of misconduct committed by the workman was very serious . After understanding the charge the workman submitted her explanation . Thereafter a departmental enquiry was conducted in the matter . The workman participated in the enquiry alongwith her defence representative and utilized the opportunities extended to her to cross - examine the witnesses and also to produce her evidence/defence . It is submitted that the enquiry conducted against her is fair and in accordance with the provisions of the Bi - partite settlement and all the principles of natural justice were complied with .
"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank . New Delhi in imposing the punishment of stoppage of next one increment with cumulative effect on Smt . Pushp Lata Sethi . Clerk vide their order dt . 04-02-1994 is legal and justified ? If not . what relief is the said workman entitled to ? "
The union has filed statement of claim on behalf of the workman . In the statement of claim . it has been stated that the workınan Smt . Pushp Lata Sethi is in non- subordinate cadre of the Syndicate Bank and while working at its Narela Branch as Cashier was suspended by the Manager of Narela Branch who happened not to be a disciplinary authority and later the action of the Branch Manager of Narela Branch of the bank was ratified by the disciplinary authority of the bank , which is bad in law and thereby indication of disciplinary proceedings against the workman was void ab- initio . That, the workman was served with a chargesheet . The charge in the chargesheet was having a broader prospective than the defined charge under the para . That . a forced enquiry was conducted over the charge which is not a defined charge in BPS and an illegal punishment of stoppage of one increment was imposed upon the workman .
The Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the workman guilty of the charge levelled against her in the chargesheet on the basis of oral and documentary evidence recorded during the enquiry. Thereafter the disciplinary authority taking into consideration the gravity ofthe misconduct and also its impact on the branch and also after satisfying himself that the misconduct committed by the workman are proved , proposed the punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect and after giving a personal hearing in the matter of proposed punishment . awarded the punishment . The workman filed an appeal to the appellate authority and the appellate authority confirmed the order by a speaking order. It is denied that a farce enquiry was conducted. It is further denied that there was no defined charge . It is further denied that the punishment imposed was illegal in any manner The stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect for the gross misconduct of willful insubordination and disobedience of lawful and reasonable orders of the management is in conformity with the gravity of the misconduct. It is submitted that in the averment of claims are ill - founded. ill - motivated and untenable . The worknian is not entitled to any relief.
The management has filed written statement . In the written statement . it has been stated that it is not denied that the workman was employed in the bank as a clerk at 386
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18 , 1926
The management in the written statement has denied almost all the paragraphs of the statement ofclaim and has stated that proper enquiry was held . Full opportunity was afforded to the CSE to cross - cxamine ( lie witnesses and she was afforded opportunity to produce evidence in her defence .
The workman has filed rejoinder and in the rejomder, she has stated the averments of her statement of claint and she has assermed that suspension letter was void ab initio . Since suspension Ietter was void the entire enquiry vitiates .
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused sthe papers on the record It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman /applicant was suspended by the Branch Manager whereas the Branch Manager is not entitled to suspend the workman/ applicant .
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] So far as the suspension is concerned , suspension isillegal . In case suspension is found illegal , the workman/ applicant shall be deemed to be an employee of the management and suspension order will not be effective in the circumstances of the case . The result would be thal the workman applicant would be entitled to get all the benefits as if she had not been suspended as suspension order is invalid and illegal .
The reference is replied thus:
The action of the management of Syndicate Bank , NewDethi in imposing the punishment of soppage of next one increment with cumulative effect on Smt . Puslip Lata Sethi , Clerk vide their orderdt. 04-02-1994 is not absolutely Iegal and justified. The workman/ applicant is entitled to get full wages and benefits of her period of suspension . So far as with holding of one increment with cumulative effect is concerned, it is quite proper and valid. The management is directed to make payment of the entire amount of her wages of the period of suspension within one month fromthe publication of the award as suspension is illegal . In case of defaull , the workman/ applicant will be ensilled 10 get an interest of 12% per annum .
The award is given accordingly.
DI .: 14-12-2004
In this context , my attention was drawn to Iciter dt . 4-5-67 . By this circular, the competent authority for suspension has been prescribed and Breach Manager is no where empowered to suspend any employee . In view of the circular iciter d1 . 4-5-1967 , the Branch Manager has got no power to suspend an employee . The workman/ applicant was suspended by the Branch Manager and is was subsequently ratified by the disciplinary authority bui there is no provision for ratification of suspension order As such , suspension order is quite illegal but suspension order anddomestic enquiry are two different aspects of The same Act The domestic enquiry can be conducted without suspending an employee As such, suspension lias gor no nexus with the conduct of domestic enquiry. Suspension is of course void ab initio bor enquiry will not be void ab initio on account of the illegal suspension . domestic enquiries can be held without suspension . Tie workman/applicant has admitted in her cross - exammation that she appeared before she enquin oficer alongwith her defence representantes , the copies ofall the documents were supplied to her and also the copies of documents asked for by lier. she did not know ifthe witness produced by the managenient were cross - examined by her defence representant She was given opportunity to produce her evidence . Objections raised by her defence representative were recorded by the enquin olicer . The enquiry officer hid given opportunity 10 produce her entire evidence . From the admissions of the workman/ applicant , it becoines quite clear akan she has been afforded proper opportunity during the enquiry proceedings and enquiry has been held according to the principle of natural justice and she has (ces Morded proper opportunity . In case , the enquiry has been held, according to the principles of natural justice and the workman/applicant has been provided opportunity to defend himself, the enquiry cannot be said to be unfair. From penisal of the record, it becomes obvious that the enquiry is quite fair.
R.N. RAJ . Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 112.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ वीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच. अनुचंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में ऑद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 19/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है. जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्रत्न हुआ था ।
(सं. एल 12012/389/2001 आई. आर. ( चो. - 1 ) )
मी. गंगाभरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 112. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Acl . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref No. 19 / 2002 ) of the Industraat Tribonal - cum - Labour Court . Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikanes & Jaipur and their workman, which was recen ed by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[ No L - 12012/ 389/2001 - IR( B - 1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN . Under Secv, [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
387
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
अनुबंध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, जोधपुर
पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री के. के. गुप्ता, आर.एच.जे.एस. औ.वि. ( केन्द्रीध ) संख्या: 19/2002
श्री भैरूलाल सालवी पुत्र श्री हीरालाल जी सालवी द्वारा श्री ललित शर्मा महामंत्री, अखिल भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर कर्मचारी संघ, द्वारा एस.बी.बी.जे. मंडिया रोड़ शाखा पाली, मारवाड़ प्रार्थी
बनाम
सहायक महाप्रबन्धक प्रथम, स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, अंचल कार्यालय-6 - ए न्यूफतेहपुरा, उदयपुर अप्रार्थी उपस्थिति:
(1) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री अनिल मेहता उप.
(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि हाजिर नहीं ।
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक 14-9-2004
श्रम मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल-12012/389/2001 ( आई.आर. बी-1) दिनांक 11-3-2002 के द्वारा निम्न विवाद वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है :
" क्या श्रमिक श्री भैरूलाल सालवी को उसके नियोजक- सहायक महाप्रबन्धक स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर क्षेत्र प्रथम अंचल कार्यालय उदयपुर, द्वारा उसकी नियुक्ति की तिथि दिनांक 9-7-1994 से उसे नियमित/ स्थायी नियुक्ति नहीं देकर एक नियमित चतुर्थ श्रेणी कर्मचारी के समान वेतन एवं अन्य सुविधाएं नहींदिया जाना उचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो श्रमिक अपने नियोजक से क्या राहत पाने का अधिकारी है ? "
उक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहूत किया गया । प्रार्थी ने अपना मांग - पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिसका अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब प्रस्तुत किया गया । दोनों पक्षों की ओर से शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किये गये , प्रार्थी के साक्षियों से अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा यह प्रकरण अप्रार्थी के गवाह से जिरह हेत्तु 26-8-04 क्रो नियत किया गया उसी दरम्यान दिनांक 26-7-04 को प्रार्थी की ओर से एक प्रार्थना-पत्र इस आशय का पेश किया कि प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के मध्य हुई वार्ता के आधार पर समझौते का आश्वासन देने के कारण प्रार्थी यूनियन इस वाद को आगे नहीं चलाना चाहती है तथा प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के बीच लोक अदालत की भावना से राजीनामा हो जाने के कारण इस प्रकरण में कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय पारित किया जावे । उक्त प्रार्थना - पत्र की प्रति अप्रार्थी को दी गई । चूंकि दोनों पक्षों के मध्य लोक अदालत की भावना से राजीनामा हो चुका है और प्रार्थी यूनियन इस विवाद को आगे चलाना नहीं चाहती है अतः समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए इस प्रकरण में " कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय " ( नो डिस्प्यूट एवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।
इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार, नई दिल्लीको प्रेषित किया जावे ।
यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 14-9-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।
1
के.के. गुप्ता , न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 113.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल-12012/137/2002- आई., आर. ( बी. - 1 ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 S.O. 113. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 5/2004) ofthe Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012/ 137 /2002 - IR ( B - 1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
अनुबंध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, जोधपुर
पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री के. के. गुप्ता , आर.एच.जे.एस. औ.वि. ( केन्द्रीय ) संख्या : 5/2004
श्रीमति लक्ष्मी कच्छवाहा वगैरा जरिये प्रेसिडेन्ट स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर कर्मचारी संघ, मार्फत एस.बी.बी. जे. सुराणा मार्केट ब्रांच , पाली, मारवाड़ । प्रार्थी
बनाम
1. प्रबन्ध निदेशक एस.बी.बी.जे. हैड ऑफिस तिलक मार्ग, जयपुर 2. एसिस्टेन्ट जनरल मैनेजर, एस.बी.बी.जे. रिजनल ऑफिस ए-23 शास्त्रीनगर, जोधपुर । अप्रार्थी 388
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 / PAUSA 18 , 1926
उपस्थिति:
( 1) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री अनिल मेहता उप.
(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री पी.पी. माथुर उप.
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक 12-8-2004
श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार, नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल-12012/ 137/2002 [ आई .आर. ( वी -1) ] दिनांक 20-2-2004 से निम्न विवाद वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है :
" च्या प्रबन्ध निदेशक, स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर प्रधान कार्यालय तिलक मार्ग , जयपुर द्वारा लिपिक सह- रोकड़िया- श्री लक्ष्मी कच्छावा एव १ अन्य को 27 फरवरी 1993 के निर्देश दिनांक 28-11-98 व 24-10-83 के विरुद्ध श्री एल.एन. झालानी एवं श्री आर.के . अग्रवाल को विशेष सहायक के पद पर अंचल कार्यालय में 5 वर्ष से अधिक समय से पदस्थापित रखना सही एवं न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो कर्मचारी संघ प्रभावित सदस्यगण कब और किस प्रकार लाभान्वित होंगे ?"
उक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहूत किया गया। दिनांक 8-7-04 को दोनों पक्ष उपस्थित आये व मांग- पत्र पेश करने हेतु आज कीपेशी नियत की गई । दिनांक 26-7-04 को प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी ने एक प्रार्थना- पत्र इस आशय का पेश किया कि प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के मध्य हुई वार्ता के आधार पर समझौतें का आश्वासन देने के कारण प्रार्थी यूनियन कथित वाद आगे नहीं चलाना चाहती है अतः प्रकरण में नोडिस्पयूट एवार्ड पारित किया जावे । अतः प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के मध्य कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने के कारण इस प्रकरण में अब कोई विवाद शेष नहीं रह जाने के कारण इस प्रकरण में " कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय " ( नोडिस्पयुट एवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।
इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार, नई दिल्ली को प्रेषित किया जावे ।
यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 12-8-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।
के.के. गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 114.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2002 )
[ PART 11 -SLC. 3 ( ii ) | प्राप्त हुआ था । को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को [ सं. एल.- 12012/484/2001 - आई. आर. ( बी. - 1 ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 114. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref No. 13/2002 ) of the Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court. Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[No. L- 12012/484 /2001 - IR ( B - I ) ] C GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
अनुबंध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर
पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री के. के. गुप्ता, आर.एच.जे.एस. औ.वि. ( केन्द्रीय ) संख्या: 13/2002
श्री चन्द्रभूषण कुमार जरिये प्रेसिडेन्ट अखिल भारतीय एस.बी.बी.जे. कर्मचारी संघ, द्वारा स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर सुराणा मार्केट ब्रांच, पाली ( मारवाड़) प्रार्थी
बनाम
दी मैनेजर पर्सनल ( प्रशासन ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बोकानेर एण्ड जयपुर मुख्यालय तिलक मार्ग , जयपुर । अप्रार्थी उपस्थिति:
(1 ) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री अनिल मेहता उप.
(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री पी.पी. माथुर उप.
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक 12-8-2004
श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार, नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल-12012/484/2001 ( आई.आर.वी-1 ) दिनांक 4-4-2002 से निम्न विवाद वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेपित किया है :
" क्या प्रबन्ध निदेशक, स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर प्रधान कार्यालय, जयपुर के द्वारा श्रमिक श्री चन्द्रभूषण कुमार, लिपिक टंकक का स्थानान्तरण देवगढ़ मदारिया से भदोही ( उ.प्र. ) नहींकरके श्री राजेश कुमार मिश्रा के पदस्थापना आदेश दिनांक 11-11-96 से करना उचित एवं वैध है ? यदि नहीं, तो उक्त श्रमिक अपने नियोजक से क्या राहत पाने का अधिकारी है ? " [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
उक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहुत किया गया। प्रार्थी ने अपना मांग - पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिसका जवाब अप्रार्थी की ओर से पेश किया गया । मांग - पत्र के समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ - पत्र प्रस्तुत किया तथा यह प्रकरण अप्रार्थी के शपथ- पत्र हेतु नियत था । इसी दरम्यान प्रार्थी की ओर से दिनांक 26-7-04 को एक प्रार्थना- पत्र कोई विवाद नहीं रहने का अधिनिर्णय पारित करने हेतु पेश किया जो आज की पेशी पर रखा गया । आज दोनों पक्षों के प्रतिनिधी उपस्थित हैं । प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी ने प्रार्थना- पत्र में अभिकथित किया है कि प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के मध्य हुई वार्ता के आधार पर समझौते का आश्वासन देने के कारण प्रार्थी यूनियन उक्त वाद आगे चलाना नहीं चाहती है, प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के मध्य कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने के कारण उक्त प्रकरण में अब कोर्ह विवाद शेप नहीं रह जाने के कारण इस प्रकरण में " कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय (नोडिस्पयुट एवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।"
इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार, नई दिल्लीको प्रेषित किया जावे ।
यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 12-8-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।
के.के. गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 115.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल.- 12012/ 210/2003- आई. आर. ( बी. - 1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 115. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 7/2004 ) of the Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012/ 210/ 2003 - IR( B - 1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy
389
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
अनुबंध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर
औ.वि. ( केन्द्रीय ) संख्या : 7/2004
पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री के.के. गुप्ता, आर.एच.जे.एस. नाथुराम डांगी द्वारा महामंत्री, अखिल भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्डजयपुर कर्मचारी संघ , पाली मारवाड़ । प्रार्थी
बनाम
सहायक महाप्रबन्धक स्टेट बैंक आफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, जोधपुर । अप्रार्थी उपस्थिति:
( 1 ) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री अनिल मेहता उप.
(2 ) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री पी.पी. माथुर उप.
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक 02-9-2004
श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार , नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल -12012/210/2003 दिनांक 15-3-2004 से निम्न विवाद वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है :
" क्या कर्मकार श्री नाथुराम डांगी लिपिक सह रोकड़िया तख्तगढ़ को उसके नियोजक सहायक महाप्रबन्धक- III , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्डजयपुर, अंचल कार्यालय ए-30 शास्त्रीनगर, जोधपुर द्वारा अपने दण्डादेश दिनांक 16-8-2002 के द्वारा 2 वर्ष के लिये प्रधान रोकड़िया श्रेणी ई के पद से प्रत्याहित किया जाना उचित एवं वैध है ? यदि नहीं, तो कर्मकार अपने नियोजक से क्या राहत पाने का अधिकारी है ? "
उक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहुत किया गया, दोनों पक्ष उपस्थित हुए व यह प्रकरण आज मांग - पत्र पेश करने हेतु नियत था । 6-8-04 को प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि ने एक प्रार्थना- पत्र इस आशय का पेश किया कि प्रार्थी कर्मचारी संघ उपरोक्त प्रकरण को नहीं चलाना चाहता है अतः उक्त प्रकरण में लोक अदालत की भावना से नोडिस्पयुट एवार्ड पारित कर दिया जावे । उक्त प्रार्थना- पत्र आज पत्रावली के साथ पेश हुआ । चूंकि प्रार्थी कर्मचारी संघ उपरोक्त प्रकरण को चलाना नहीं चाहता है तथा लोक अदालत की भावना से प्रकरण में कोई कार्यवाही आगे चलाना नहीं चाहता है । अतः समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए इस प्रकरण में " कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय" (नोडिस्पयूट एवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।
इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार, नई दिल्ली को प्रेषित किया जावे ।
यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 2-9-2004 को खुले न्यायालय मे हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।
के.के. गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश 390
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 116.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल-12011/ 29/2001- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December, 2004 S.O. 116.- In pursuanceuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33/ 2001 ) of the Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court . Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004.
[No. L - 12011 / 29/2001 - IR (B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
अनुबंध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री के. के. गुप्ता, आर. एच. जे. एस. औ . वि. (केन्द्रीय ) संख्या 33/2001
अखिल भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर कर्मचारी संघ , द्वारा स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, सुराणा मार्केट शाखा पाली, मारवाड़ प्रार्थी
बनाम
मैनेजिंग डायरेक्टर, स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, प्रधान कार्यालय, तिलक मार्ग , जयपुर । अप्रार्थी उपस्थिति:-
(1 ) प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि श्री अनिल मेहता उप.
(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि हाजिर नहीं ।
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक 14-9-2004 श्रम मंत्रालय, भारत सरकार, नई दिल्ली नेअपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल-12011/ 29/ 2001/ आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) दिनांक 21-8-2001 से निम्न विवाद् वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है:-
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur by not extending the facilities such as TA and DA and Special leave and
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] not holding meetings for redressal of the grievances ofthe workman who are members of Akhil Bhartiya State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Karamchari Sangh isjustified ? If not to what relief the Union concern is entitled ?"
उपरोक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायलय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहूत किया गया । प्रार्थी ने अपना मांग- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिसका अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब प्रस्तुत किया गया तथा यह प्रकरण शपथ- पत्र प्रार्थी हेतु 26-8-04 को नियत था । 26-7-04 को प्रार्थी की ओर से एक प्रार्थना- पत्र इस आशय का पेश किया कि प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के मध्य हुई वार्ता के आधार पर समझौते का आश्वासन देने के कारण प्रार्थी यूनियन यह वाद आगे नहीं चलाना चाहती है तथा प्रार्थी यूनियन व अप्रार्थी संस्थान के बीच लोक अदालत की भावना से राजीनामा हो जाने के कारण इस प्रकरण में कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय पारित किया जावे, उक्त प्रार्थना- पत्र की प्रति अप्रार्थी को दी गई । चूंकि दोनों पक्षों के मध्य लोक अदालत की भावना से राजीनामा हो चुका है और प्रार्थी यूनियन इस विवाद को आगे चलाना नहीं चाहती है अत्तः समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए इस प्रकरण में " कोई विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय ( नो डिस्प्यूट अवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।"
इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकार नई दिल्ली को प्रेषित किया जावे ।
यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 14-9-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।
के.के. गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 117.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 107/97) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/55/1996- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 117. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award. ( Ref. No. 107/ 97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court-H,New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012 / 55/ 1996 - IR( B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR , RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI
Presiding Officer : R. N. Rai
I. D. NO. 107/97
In the matter of :
Sh . Umed Singh ,
Through Sh . S. K. Patney, Circle President , SBI Staff Association , (Delhi Circle) A- 50, New Multan Nagar , Delhi - 56
Versus
S.B.I ..
Through the Asstt . General Manager, Region No. IV, SBI , Delhi Zonal Office , 11 , Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 01 .
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 55/96 IR- (B - I ) Central governmentdt . 10-7-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication .
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of SBI in terminating the services of Sh . Umed Singh w.e.f. 1-6-95 is just and fair ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled " .
The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that on 6-7-94 the workman was appointed as a messenger at Ajmal Khan Road . Karol Bagh . New Delhi branch of the bank . He worked thereat continuously from 6th July, 1994 to 31st May. 1995 to the entire satisfaction of his superiors .
That the service conditions of the workman in the bank are governed by Sastry Award as modified by the Desai Award and subsequent Bipartite Settlements . That on 31-5-95 (w.e.f. 1-6-95 ) the bank terminated the services ofthe workman without assigning any reasons and without any proper notice or salary in lieu of the notice. The bank did not pay any retrenchment compensation to the workman as provided for in S. 25 of the I.D. Act , 1947 .
That the workman had worked for more than 240 days in one calendar year and fall under the category of protected workman. That in payment of the wages bank used to obtain from the workman the bills in the shape of 3830 GI/2004-24
391
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
water supply @ 1.25 per bucket and pay the same by banker's cheque . The branch manager was doing so to hoodwink the authorities. The workman was performing the duties of a messenger and was at times deputed to outdoor duties and paid the conveyance bill for the same photocopy of some such paid bills is enclosed and marked as Annexures A - 1 to 4 .
That the bank while terminating the services of the workman also violated the provision of para 522 (4) of the Sastry Award which provides as under :-
" The services of any employee other than a permanent employee or probationer may be terminated and he may leave service after 14 days ' notice."
No notice whatsoever was given to the employee . That the workman was not given any letter of appointment specifying pay and allowances and period of employment . That the action of the bank in terminating the service of the workman was illegal . The matter was raised before ALC( C) , New Delhi .
The Central Government through its order No. L- 12012 / 55 / 96 - IR (B - I ) dated 10-7-97 has referred the following dispute to your honour for adjudication :
"Whether the action of the management of SBI in terminating the services of Sh . Umed Singh w.e.f. 1-6-95 is just and fair ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to" .
That the workınan worked from 6-7-94 to 31-5-95 continuously at Ajmal Khan Road branch . That the workman worked for inore than 240 days in one calendar year.
That the bank did not give any appointment letter to the workman limiting or specifying his period ofservice . That the bank did not give any notice while retrenching the workman. The bank did not pay any salary in lieu of notice . The bank also did not pay any retrenchment compensation and that the bank resorted to cheap tactics of paying wages on the dotted lines .
That the action of the termination of the service of the workman by the bank is neither just nor fair.
The management/ respondent has filed WS . In the WS it has been submitted that the dispute raised by Sh. Umed Singh is not an industrial dispute as the allegations made by Sh . Umed Singh that he was appointed as messenger at Ajmal Khan Road Karol Bagh branch of the bank from 6-7-94 to 31-5-95 is absolutely wrong and denied. It is absolutely incorrect that Sh. Umed Singh was appointed as messenger or he worked as messenger at Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh branch of the bank . There is no relationship of master and servant . Actually the branch which is situated at first floor does 392
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005/PAUSA 18 , 1926
not have an appropriate supply of water and the branch used to purchase water from Sh . Umed Singh for which he used to submit bills and the payment was accordingly made to him . No salary or wages was ever paid to Sh . Umed Singh by the bank . The bank has no control over the work of Sh . Umed Singh. So , the allegations made by him are false and the dispute raised by him is not maintainable at all.
That the SBI is a public sector bank and there are set rules and regulations for the appointment of staff in the bank. Under these rules the branch manager has no authority to appoint any person . The appointment under these rules are made by the appointing authority at the zonal office after observing the rules in this regard with regard to giving equal opportunity to all the persons who apply for the job . The rules regarding reservation etc. are also observed. Admittedly the present claimant has never been recruited in the bank through the established rules . If engagement for purchasing water are taken as appointments then it shall open the back door in the appointments in the public sector banks and shall be violative of articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India .
That even otherwise the claimant is not entitled for any relief . It has been held in Eranallor Services Co - op . Bank Ltd Is . Labour Court and others decided by Kerala High Court reported in 1987 bankers journal page 259 that See 2 ( 00 ) suggest that the person who claim the benefits of Sec 25 ( F ) of the ID Act mustbe one validly appointed in the services of the employer . The services must be capable of being continued only if any of the events envisaged under clauses a , b and e of Sec. 2 ( oo) happens . In short the person who claims the benefit of Sec . 25 ( F ) shall establish that he is on the services of employer having been appointed validly. It should be remembered that it is the contract of service that is terminated . The services cannot be terminated unless it is capable of being continued and capable of being continued means that the employee should have entered the service under a valid contract of services which cannot be terminated without complying with the provisions of Sec . 25 ( F) . The workman in order to avail all the benefits of Sec . 25 ( F ) shall have to establish that he has the right to continue in service . In the present case as there was no contract of service so; the question of pay ment of compensation u/s 25 ( F) of ID Act does not arise at all.
That the bank entered into an agreement with the All India State Bank of India staff federation for absorption for various personnel who have rendered temporary service or were engaged as casual labourer in the bank vide agreement dated 17-11-87 duly modified by agreement dated 16-7-88 In pursuance of that the bank made publications in various newspapers on 1-5-91 inviting applications from these persons for empanelling them for absorption in the bank provided they fulfil the various eligibility criteria as laid down in the agreement . One of
[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] terms of the said agreement was that the persons who failed to apply for being given a chance for permanent appointment in the bank's service within the period specified by the bank , would fall under non-eligibility category. Sh . Umed Singh who did not submit any application in response to the bank's advertisement is not eligible to claim employment in the bank . On this ground alone his claim is liable to be dismissed . Even otherwise Sh. Singh was not eligible as per the terms of settlements for permanent absorption in the bank.
The management has denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim .
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his claim .
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record. It was submitted from the side ofthe workman that the workman worked in the concerned branch from 10-08-1994 to 31-05-1994 so he has worked for more than 25 days . He was given payment every month and he has discharged all the duties of a messenger and it has been admitted by the management . As such, the payment made to the workman applicant has been admitted by the bank but it has been explained by the bank that the payment was made to him for supply of water. The cheques have been issued in the name of the workman applicant and it has been nowhere mentioned that he has given monthly salary for charges of supplying water to the branch . Only in the written statement , the case of making payment for supply of water has been taken and it transpires that he has done all the work of a messenger and peon while he was posted in the bank and on a particular date , he has gone on several places so it cannot be said that he supplied water as well as discharged the other duties . Payments have been made by voucher for the work which he performed during the period of his engagement . These payments have been admitted by the bank . It was submitted from the side of the management that he was supplying water to the branch as there was shortage of water in that area . He was given no appointment letter and he was not appointed by the competent authority, the Branch Manager is not the competent authority to appoint a person . He has been paid conveyance charges as he performed some duties of the messenger when he was found spared.
The Branch Manager has got no power to appoint the messenger of the bank. So he was illegally engaged by the Branch Manager . In this context , my attention was drawn to 1994 LLJ - 11-320 , M.P. High Court . The Hon'ble High Court has held that in case , the appointment is valid, even then 25- F of the ID Act is attracted . In 1995 , LLJ - I- 973 , the same view has been expressed by the Hon'ble High Court . I have perused 1996 - LLJ - 1 - page 478 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also held that in case the workman has done 240 days work , he is entitled to be [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
393
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
regularised . In 1991 LLJ - I , page 155 , the same view has been expressed by the Hon'ble High Court . The management has raised only two points , the first is that the Branch Manager is not competent to employ or engage a messenger or a peon. But in view of the judgements of the Hon'ble High Court , this point carries no force . The other point raised by the bank is that the payment has been made to him for supply of water. In case he supplied water for the whole day, how he performed duties of going to the different banks and different offices for collection of cheques and for service of urgent letters. As such, he worked as full fledged messenger or peon during the period mentioned above . Indeed , the Branch Manager is not a competent authority to appoint a messenger but in view of the judgements stated above , even if the engagement or employment is illegal , section 25 - F is attracted. In case section 25 - F is attracted , he deserves to be regularised. It is not the case of the bank that he served at the place of some other workman or messenger. In case , he did not discharge the duties of a messenger, who else performed all the work of the branch . He was the only person who performed the urgent work of the bank . There was no other messenger engaged at that time . This concludes that the workman applicant has done all the duties as a messenger and he has received money for his expenses of going to and fro and he has been made monthly payment also.
So far as wages are concerned , he is a manual worker and he must be doing some work to sustain his livelihood so regularisation of his service without back wages is sufficient for the ends ofjustice with continuity of service.
The reference is replied thus :-
The action of the management of the SBI in terminating the services of Sh . Umed Singh w.e.f. 1-6-95 is neither just nor fair . The workman applicant deserves to be regularised from 1-6-1995 without any back wages . The management is directed to regularise the services of the workman without any back wages but with continuity of service from 1-6-1995 within one month from publication of the award . In case of default , the workman applicantwill be entitled to 10% interest on the back wages that will accrue.
DT. 13-12-2004
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 118.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय , शोलापुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. नं. 9/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12014/5/2004-आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 118. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. I. D. No. 9/95 ) of the Labour Court , Solapur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12014/5 /2004 - IR(B - I ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF JUDGE , II LABOUR COURT, SOLAPUR , AT SOLAPUR Ref . I.D.A. No. 9/95
Adjudication between :
Regional Manager, Bank of India , Solapur.
-1 Party
V/ s
President, Bank of India Staff Union .
-11 Party Corum : Shri K. B. Wagh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES :
Shri . Sarada , Advocate , for the I Party. Shri . G. H. Kulkarni , Advocate , for II Party.
AWARD (Delivered on 27-8-2004)
1. Present reference is referred by the Desk Officer, Ministry of Labour, Government of India, New Delhi , vide order dated 16-8-1994, to this court for adjudication of a dispute between State Bank of India , Solapur ( hereinafter referred to as the 1 party) and State Bank of India Staff Union (hereinafter referred to as the II party) . Accordingly notices were served on the parties . Both parties appeared in the court . The 11 party has submitted his statement of claim Exh . U - 5 and contended that the Il party union is registered Trade union and affiliated to National Confederation of Bank of India Staff Unions (NCBISU) and National Confederation of Bank Employees (NCBE ) . The 1 party is a National Bank having its branches in the Solapur city. The 1 party has engaged several employees in various categories . The service conditions of Bank employees are governed by Sastry Award, Desai Award , various bipartite settlements and guidelines given by the finance department of Government of India. The service conditions are also governed by various sets of rules and customs formulated over the years by the Bank . On the basis of directives from Ministry of Finance, Deptt . of 3 (ii) ]
[ PART II- SEC .
394
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
Economic Affairs (Banking Division) New Delhi transfers of clerical staff from one branch to another are made by circular dated 12-3-82 by General Manager, Bank of India . The main features of the said circular are given as under :
(a) in any case the posting of any clerical staff at a branch/office should not be extended beyond five years on any account .
(b) branch - wise lists of entire clerical staff of the Region according to the period of their posting at the Branch or office should be prepared by the Regional Office .
(c) clerical staff should be classified for the lists as who have been assigned duties of special assistance for unspecified period who have been assigned likewise other duties attracting special allowance who are not in receipt of any special allowance .
(d) transfers should be effected on the basis of first come, first go at each branch or office .
(e) no discretion is vested with any official at any level to deviate from the guidelines quoted in the circulardt . 12-3-82 .
The I party has effected the transfers with a view to courage membership of Il party union and had shown the discremination . The I party has shown favouritism to all other employees falling under the category of clerical staff who is not receipt of special allowance , working at main branch for more than five years . The first party has shown the favouritism towards some of the activists/ members of Bank of India Employees Union Solapur (affiliatedto A.I.B.E.A. ) . The I party has effected the transfers mala fide from one place to another under the guise of management policy. The I party has committed the breach of circulardt . 12-3-82 . There are no legal , valid grounds for effecting the transfers . No body has requested for the transfers . No choice was sought from the employees by the i party. The I party has effected the transfers arbitrarily, ex parte . The first party has ignored the guidelines given by the finance dept . of Govt . of India and exceeded the powers and jurisdiction . While effecting the transfers the I party has made exception in cases of agricultural assistants , teller etc. The I party has violated the declared policies , accepted principles about the transfers . The I party has deviated from the directives given by the Head Office and Ministry of Finance , Govt . of India , even though I party is not allowed to do so . The transfers effected by the I party are vindictive. The I party has committed breach of Section 25- T of I.D.A. by engaging in unfair labour practices . On the basis of aforesaid contentions the II party has prayed for quashing and setting aside the transfer order of employees mentioned in the schedule alongwith restraining order against the I party in respect of transfer of employees in contravention of provisions of Law, circular, guidelines , principles of first come first go and posting of the employees at their original posting.
2. Whereas I party by filing written statement Exh . C-6 seriously resisted and denied the contentions of the II party. It is contended by the I party that as per the circular the management has every right to transfer award staff i.e. clerical staff as per the exigencies of administration to any branch within the same linguistic area. The same view is upheld by our Bombay High Court . In such a circumstances the grievance raised by the Second Party in para 3 of the application does not appear to be correct . The II party has purposely suppressed the fact that Shri Uplaikar was acting as a Cash Clerk and that means he was a clerical staff. The necessary guidelines were issued to the Zonal Manager. Regional Manager laying down the procedure to be adopted for effecting the transfer of the clerical staff and the said procedure laid down in circular under reference cannot take away the original right of the first party as per the administrative exigencies . The letter dated 11-1-1993 submitted by General Secretary , Staff Union. Solapur unit . addressed to Regional Manager , Solapur, does not figure the name of Shri . K. V. Uplaikar as Joint General Secretary of II party . The name of The II party further submitted that the employees mentioned in the Schedule of reference i.e. K. V. Uplaikar falls under the category of employees who are not in receipt of any special allowance . Said Shri . Uplaikar joined the Bank of India main branch on 15-10-84 . He was transferred to Subhash Chowk, Branch-( currency Chest ) under five year formula on 11-11-91 . Shri . K. V. Uplaikar worked at Subhash chowk branch upto 2-1-91 and he has received the pay of a month from Subhash Chowk branch . Shri . K. V. Uplaikar was again transferred to Solapur main branch on 2-12-91 and joined the said branch on 3-12-91 . As per circulardt . 12-3-82 for the list of employees of other clerical staff i.e. without allowance the name of Shri K. V. Uplaikar comes at Sr. No. 37 under five year formula as he joined the main branch after transfer on 3-12-91 . Shri A. K. Lamkane and S. M. Birajdar are working at main Branch at Solapur since 1-11-78 and 28-1-83 respectively and they are at Sr. Nos . 1 and 2 as per the list prepared under five year formula prescribed by the circular dt. 12-3-82. But they and other employees are not considered for transfers by the first party even though they are working for more than five years at the same branch/ office . Shri K. V. Uplaikar was working as a Joint General Secretary of IInd party union . He is active office bearer . The Bank of India employees union affiliated to All India Bank Employees Association is a rival union in Bank of India and first party acted under the influence of and pressure of said rival union . The transfer of Shri . K. V. Uplaikar has been effected deliberately by ignoring the circular, guidlines etc. with a view to harass him being office bearer of IInd party.
395 [ भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18, 1926
Shri K. V. Uplaikar not comes at Sr. no . 37 on the five year formula . The clerical staff can be transferred as per the convenience of the management and not at per the sweet wish of any party. The Management and the employees has to take into consideration smooth working ofthe institution . Only it has to be taken into consideration that the transfer of an employee should not cause any sort ofharassment to the concerned party. In the present case, it can be very well seen that , Shri . K. V. Uplaikar has not specifically mentioned about how injustice is caused by transferring him from main branch to Subhash Chowk and vice versa . Shri K. V. Uplaikar has rejoined the main branch on 3-12-91 and he has not made any complaint for more than one and half year for the said transfer . On the contrary, by his conduct hë showed that he has gladly accepted the transfer . Therefore his conduct stopped himself to raise complaint about transfer as per the principles of estoppel. It is further submitted that the action of management of I party Solapur in transferring employees were fully justified and they are in consonance with Bank's established policies and administrative exigencies . Unless the II party states as to how prejudice has been caused to him ori account of his transfer it is not worth to consider the objection raised by the 11 party. On the basis of aforesaid contentions the I party has prayed fordismissing the reference with costs .
FINDINGS
ISSUES
... Not proved.
1. Does II party prove that transferring the employees mentioned in the Schedule of the reference by the 1 party is illegal and unjustified ?
2. Whether reference is maintainable ?... No.
... No .
3. Whether II party is entitled for relief as prayed ?
4. What award ?
...As per award passed below.
REASONS
etc. II party also prayed that the I party be directed to count the date of posting for five year formula as per circular dated 12-3-82 from the date when the employees join at their original place of posting . II party also prayed for costs of the proceeding and just an equitable orders that may deem fit . Whereas I party filed w.s. Exh . C- 6 and thereby seriously resisted and denied the case of II party: Allegations of II party that the I party has engaged in transferring employees named in the schedule of present reference is also denied and contended that its action of transferring said employees is fully in consonance and in conformity with the transfer policy laid down in circular dt. 12-3-1982 which is filed with list exh . C - 9 . It is contended that the case of Il party is liable to be dismissed as the allegations are made with ulterior motive . Therefore burden of proving the allegations is on II party. However , despite of several opportunities II party workman did not enter the witness box and filed no evidence purshis exh . U- 12 . Therefore as per order dated 2-7-04 passed on exh . O- 1 the evidence of II party came to be closed. I party also did not examine any witness . Evidence of the I party came to be closed by orderdt. 12-8-04 passed on exh . O-1 . However, I party has produced circular dt. 12-3-82 with the list exh . C- 9 which lay down transfer policy of workman of I party. Circulardt. 12-3-82 is relied upon by both parties . In absence of any oral evidence 1 have no alternative but to consider material on record. Circular dated 12-3-82 is a vital document admitted by both parties. It is supporting the contention of I party that transfer of employees named in the reference is totally in consonance with circular dated 12-3-1982 . So action of 1 party transferring employees as per provisions and the transfer policy laid down in circular dt . 12-3-1982 cannot be said to be illegal and unjustified especially when the II party failed to adduce any oral or documentary evidence contrary to circular dt . 12-3-1982 . Therefore I hold and conclude that action of 1 party in transferring employees named in the present reference is legally justified. II party failed to prove the allegation that I party's action of transferring employees named in the reference is illegal and unjustified as alleged or otherwise . Therefor issue nos . 1 and 2 are answered in the negative.
Issue No. 3 :
3. Heard Ld. advocates for both parties . Perused material on record and after considering the sanie I came to the findings as stated above for the following reasons.
Issue Nos . 1 and 2 :
5. In view of findings to issue nos . 1 and 2 , Il party is not entitled for any relief. Hence Issue no. 3 is hereby answered in the negative .
6. At this stage it is pertinent to mention that , once reference is made it is a duty of this court to answer the reference either on merit or on the basis of material on record and to inform the award to the concerned Government . In absence of any oral evidence I have adjudicated dispute herein on the basis of admitted document being circulardt. 12-3-1982 filed with list exh. C-9 and proceed to pass the following award .
4. After due service of notice both parties have appeared before the court . II party filed statement of claim exh . U - 5 alleging that action of I party transferring the workman named in the schedule of present reference is illegal and unjustified and prayed for a declaration to that effect and also prayed for relief that the employees specified in schedule of reference be transferred to their original place of posting and I party be directed not to transfer the employees in contravention of provisions of law, circular, guidelines , principles of first come first go
3830 Gl/2004-25 396
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 : 2005 /PAUSA 18. 1926
AWARD
1. Reference exh . 0-1 is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
11. Award accordingly
Di. 27-8-2004 .
K. B. WAGH. Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर , 2004
का. आ. 119.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में . केन्द्रीय सरकार नेहरू युत्रा केन्द्र संगठन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.- II . नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 232/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[ सं. एल.- 42012/ 165/99- आई . आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 119. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publislics the award ( Ref. No. 232/ 99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court No. II . New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation 10 the management of Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-12-2004 ,
[No. L -42012/165 / 99 - IR (DU ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - 11 , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI
R. N. Rai . Presiding Officer.
1. D. NO . 232/99
in the matter of :
Sh . Maheshwar Prasad S/ o Sh . Devi Prasad. R/ o R- 9 / 2 . Raj Nagar. Ghaziabad.
Versus
The Director General .
Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan, Department of Youth Affair and Sports . Min . of Human Resources . East Plaza , 1 G. Indore Stadium , New Delhi - 110001 .
[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L -42012/ 165/99 IR ( DU ) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 19-11-1999 has referred the following point for adjudication .
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the matiagement of Nehru Yuva Kendra. Ghaziabad in terminating the services of Sh . Maheshwar Prasad , Ex. Computer Incharge wc.f. (01-08-1997 is legal andjustified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to" .
;
The workman has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claith , it has been stated that the workman was appointed as Computer Incharge by the Management in January. 1992 through District Youth Coordinator, Neliru Yuva Kendra . Ghaziabad. The last pay drawn by the workman was Rs. 3. ( X ) ) per month. That the workman performed his duties honestly, punctually and in a disciplined and dedicated manner without giving any cause of complaint to his superiors . This was certified by Shri D. K Tyagi : District Youth Coordinator, Nehru Yuva Kendra . Ghaziabad vide certificate No. 6154/NKY /COM/ CER/96-97 de 10th July, 1997 and a copy thereof is annexed hereto
That the service of the workman was terminatedby the District Coordinator by an oral order w.e.f. 31st July. 1997 without any written notice to the workman and without paying him retrenchment compensation as mandatorily required under section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. That there was no allegation , much less any complaint . against the workman, which clearly establishes that the termination of service was not on account of any misconduct committed by the workman . That the workman made a number of representations to the authorities concerned against the wrongful , illegal and unjustified termination of his service w.c.f 31-07-1997 but he did not receive any reply from either the District Youth Co-ordinator, Ghaziabad or from the Management .
That having failed to secure redressal of his grievances/ complaint from the management, the workman gave a legal notice through his Counsel on 23rd February. 1999 to the management requesting them to re- instate the workınan in service as Computer Incharge with all the benefits including continuity of service , back wages etc. within 15 days ofthe receipt of the notice failing which the workman would be constramed to initiate necessary legal proceedings in the matter . A copy of the said notice , which was also endorsedto the Ld . Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) . Dehradun, is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure W - 2 . That the management , though supposed to be a model employer, did notbother to acknowledge any of the representations made by the workman and even the legal notice of the workman . That 397 [ भाग ।। - खंड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौष 18 , 1926
the workman is un - employed since his illegal and unjust termination by an oral order w.e.f. 31-07-1997 by the employer herein above .
The management has filed written statement . In the written statement , it has been stated that Shri Maheshwar Prasad the workman herein was never appointed in the NYKS as Computer Incharge rather initially, he offered his service on honorarium basis and the management paid him stipend/ honorarium a Rs . 700 per month . In this regard a letter Ref. No. 6154dt. October 10 , 1991 was issued to the then Youth Coordinator by the Director, Administration & Accounts , Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan . New Delhi for permission to start Computer Training Programme in the Kendra . Director clearly mentioned in his letter at point No. 11 that " The instructors will not be employees of the Sangathan and their services may be terminated at the discretion of the RC /YC but will not extend beyond duration of the course . They will have no right to claim for employment in the Sangathan . "
hence the service of the workman automatically came to an end by the end of the session class . It is further submitted that the workman was asked to offer his service asComputer Incharge in January ' 1992 and he was paid an honorarium payment for the service rendered by him to the said computer center. It is further submitted that the respondent has been carrying on the Computer Training Programane on project basis , sanctioned by Govt . of India from time to time. Generally the above said project were carried on at different places on the basis of the project sanctioned by Govt . of India and the persons employed in these projects were paid honorarium payment and no such pay scale is determined or sanctioned . The persons employed are basically local persons of the same area and as and when the project comes to an end , automatically the services of the persons engaged by the concerned Kendra stands withdrawn without any notice . Therefore the workman cannot claim that he was employed on regulr basis and as per the recruitment rules of NYKS and further the workman has not completed 240 days in a year in order to claim the benefits of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.
The termination of service of Sh . Maheshwar Prasad. Instructor/Computer Incharge is legal and justified in the eye of law and the same was as per the terms and condition of the letter dt . 10-10-1991 . This was done under the direction of the Director Administration & Accounts and Director Admn . Issued a letter No. NYKS/Prog . / Comp. -Trg/96-00 dt. 6th June , 1996 to stop Computer Training Programme with immediate effect . However , the Training Programme continued till only May 1997 since new batch was enrolled by the Youth Coordinator much before the said order came into effect .
Nehru Yuva Kendra , Ghaziabad never issued any appointment letter to Sh . Maheshwar Prasad because the Computer Training Programme is a kind of vocational Trg . Which was run byNYK , Ghaziabad on No Profit- No Loss ' basis. So following the direction of the Director, Admn . & Accounts , YC terminated his service by an oral direction/communication . The timings of Computer Training ( Vocational Training) were 9.30 A.M. to 4.30 P.M. six days in a weck except National holidays .
It is further submitted that the nature of job was temporary and based on project work . It is further submitted that the workman himself had requested the concerned officer to issue a certificate so that he can get a job in some reputed firm or company and since he was aware that it has already been notified that the project is going to close in May, 1997. Rest of the contents are matter of record hence no comments . It is further submitted that the service of the workman was terminated by the District Coordinator by an oral communication w.e.f. 31st July, 1997 without any written notice to the workman for the reason that the nature of the job was completely on project and Computer Training Programme . It was a vocational training programme and the same comes to an end on closer of the project . It is further submitted that the Respondent is a Society Registered under society registration Act and does not fall under the definition of industry as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , hence the payment of retrenchment compensation as mandatory required under Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not arise .
It is further submitted that the nature of job was completely on project basis and Computer Training Programme was a vocational training programme and the same comes to an end on closer of the project .
The management has denied almost all the paras of the written statement .
At the time of initial engagement Sh . Prasad's educational qualification was 10 + 2 standard with one year Computer Diploma passed . Before and after training time Sh . Prasad was free to utilize his spare time as per his own will and further the workman was engaged in part time job for two & more hours in private concern after the working hour of the N.Y.K. NYKS has never paid any salary /honorarinm/stipend from its regular fund . He was paidfrom the fund collected for running the computer center on No Profit No Loss basis .
It is further submitted that the service of the workman was not terminated rather the project work of computer training programme was closed by officer letter No. NYKS /Prog./ Comp . -Trg/96-00dt . 6th June , 1996 and
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder, he has stated that he was appointed against permanent and regular vacancy. He has worked for almost five years and thereafter his services have been terminated. He is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages .
398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 8 , 2005/ PAUSA 18 , 1926
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused papers on the record .
The management respondent is an industry . The termination of his services is illegal and arbitrary. He was drawing salary from the management . It was submitted from the side of the management that he was appointed under scheme for computer education to the village people and he was not given any salary but he was given honorarium . My attention was drawn to letter dt . 10th October. 1991 It has been mentioned in the letter by the Director Administration and Accounts that the instructor will get honorarium and he will not be the employee of the Sangathan and their services may be terminated at the discretion of the R.C./Y.C . but will not extend beyond duration of the course . They will have no right to claim for employment in the Sangathan .
According to Annexure M - II , the computer centers were closed by letter dt. 6th June , 1996 .
It was submitted from the side of the management that the applicant has not been given salary but he has been given honorarium . Photocopies regarding the payment as honorarium for the entire period has been filed. As such no salary was paid to the workman applicant but he has received honorarium and he has put his signature on the same . This indicates that he was working under scheme. My attention was drawn to 2004 ( 1 ) SC Cases 126. It is necessary to establish employer - employees relationship . The workman applicant was given an honorarium and it has been specifically mentioned in the aforesaid letter that he will not be an employee of the Sangathan and he will not claim regularisation . As such , the workman applicant was not an employce of the management . My attention was drawn to 2003 (5 ) SC cases 12. It has been held by the Hon'ble High Court that in case , an employee is working under a scheme/project/ programme and in that case , the scheme is abolished, the post is also abolished automatically . There is specific order that the post will be abolished when the scheme is closed.
Reference has been made about Jawahar Lal Nehru Rojgar Yojana . The present case relates to Nehru Yuva Kendra . This organisation is of the type of organisation of Jawahar Lal Nehru Rojgar Yojana, according to the judgement of 2000/ 86 / FLR/ 450 . As such , the organisation is an industry. From perusal of the record , it transpires that the workman applicant was getting only honorarium and he was not an employee of the Sangathan as is apparent from the letter mentioned above so there is no question of his regularisation or reinstatement .
The reference is replied thus :-
The action of the management of Nehru Yuva Kendra . Ghaziabad in terminating the services of
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) | Sh . Maheshwar Prasad , Ex . Computer Incharge w.e.f. 01-08-1997 is legal and justified .
The award is given accordingly . Dt. 13-12-2004 R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 120.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, भारतीय पुरातत्व सर्वेक्षण प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ ( संदर्भ संख्या 80/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42012/3/2003- आई . आर. ( सीएम- II ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th December , 2004 S.O. 120. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 80/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Archaeological Survey of India and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 14-12-2004 .
No. L -42012/3/2003 - IR( CM - II ) ] N.P. KESAVAN , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT .
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer. I.D. No. 80/2003 Ref. No. L -42012 /3 / 2003 - IR ( CM - II) dated : 17-7-2003
BETWEEN
Sh . Amar , S / o Sh . Har Prasad , 896, Awas Vikas Colony, Sector -4 In front of Godown , Kishorpura , Agra (U.P. ) AND
1. The Superintending Archacologist . Archaeological Survey of India , Agra Division . 22 , Mall Road, Agra (U.P. ) - 282001
2. The Managing Director , Archaeological Survey of India , Janpath , New Delhi .
399 [भाग 11 बंड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8, 2005/पौष 18, 1926
AWARD
The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour, vide their order No. L - 42012/ 3/ 2003 IR ( CM - II ) dated. 17-7-2003 referred following issue for adjudication of the Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Lucknow.
" क्या अधीक्षण पुरातत्वविद, भारतीय पुरातत्व सर्वेक्षण , आगरा द्वारा कर्मकार श्री अमर पुत्र श्री हरप्रसाद सफाई कर्मकार को दिनांक 1-8-2001 से कार्य से पृथक करना न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? "
He had never worked continuously for 240 days . Subsequently, he was engaged for intermittent period as and when any casual intermittent work arose in the month of June 1997 against sanctioned estimates he was engaged . He was never engaged continuously for 240 days . He was engaged as and when some casual intermittent work arose . He did not work during May, June , July, August , September and October, 2001 and therefore , no question ofdisengagement on 1-8-2001 arises . Therefore , no cause of action arose on 1-8-2001 . It has further been alleged that worker worked for 26 days in November , 2001 and 27 days in December, 2001. He has not worked 240 days during 12 months preceding 31-12-2001 nor has he worked 240 days during 12 months from 1-8-2001 the alleged date of termination. It is also submitted that the worker has not worked 240 days in any consecutive 12 months . Therefore , the worker is not entitled for any relief. The worker was engaged on a sanctioned project work of purely casual nature of intermittent work as soon as casual nature of project work ended the engagement of the casual worker also automatically ended . Such casual labours do not acquire any right in his favour, disengagement of such casual labour is not illegal or unfair in any manner whatsoever nor it is retrenched. It is also alleged that the employer has not violated provision of Section 25F, G and H of the I.D. Act , 1947 .
Workman's case is that he was employed as Safai Karmchari in Archaeological Survey of India , Agra till 1-8-2001 and completed 240 days work in a year and acquired the right to be made permanent , but the employers terminated his services on 1-8-2001 without assigning any reason . However, when the applicant, Amar filed the dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner (C ) , Kanpur , he was again engaged for 26 days in November , 2001 and 27 days in December , 2001 and again on 1-1-2002 he was removed from services , violating the provisions of Section 25F, 25 H & G. The worker has alleged that other junior employees are still engaged. The worker has therefore requested that his services should be regularised and the management should be asked to pay salary for the period from 1-8-2001 to 31-10-2001 and from Jan. 2002 .
While filing the rejoinder the worker has alleged thatArchaeological Survey of India does fall within the ambit of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is further alleged that it is not only one single case , which is filed in CGIT- cum-Labour Court . There are hundreds of cases , which were filed in CGIT - cum - Labour Court and were disposed of. The worker has alleged that he has worked for 262 days in the year 2000. The worker has stated in the rejoinder that the Conservation Assistants are responsible for the upkeep of ancient monuments and on this ground worker was recalled from his house and engaged on 9-12-2001 .
The worker has examined himself as witness and has closed his evidence and on the other hand the employer has examined Amar Nath Gupta , Conservation Assistant , Agra.
Heard learned representatives of the parties and perused the evidence on record .
The worker has not filed any documentary evidence to support his case that he was engaged in April, 96 and worked till August, 2001 .
The management has disputed the claim of the worker by filing written statement . The first objection taken is that Archaeological Survey of India is sovereign department of Government of India and it is not an industry controlled under parameters of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Archaeological Survey of India is a sovereign department under the department of culture ofGovernment of India and is regulatedby Ancient Mounments , Archaeological Sites and Remains Act , 1958 , Rulesthereof 1959 amended in 1971 , Antiquities and Art Treasure Act , 1972 , Public Premises Act , 1957. However , the personnel working under this department are governed by CCS ( Conduct) Rules , 1965 and the temporary status casual labourers are governed by the scheme titled as Casual Labourers Grant of Temporary Status and Regularisation , 1993. This department is neither an industry nor undertakes any kind of industrial works nor is a manufacturing work , nor is a manufacturing concern to come under the purview of ID Act , 1947. As such , application of ID Act 1947 on this department is not legal and justified . It is also alleged that no cause of action has arisen on 1-8-2001 and hence the reference is not maintainable . It further submitted that the contention of the worker that he had worked in the department since 1996 is baseless . In fact , he was engaged for a highly intermittent casual work on as and when required basis in the month of June 1997 against sanctioned estimate .
It isadmitted fact that the worker is a casual daily rated worker. It is also admitted fact that there are permanent employees who engaged as Safai Karmchari such as Baini , Sajan , Sallan , Ram Prasad , Kalyan, Kullo . The argument of the opposite party is that the regular upkeep of the ancient monument is being carried out with 400
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
the assistance of the regularly employed employees . It has also been argued that whenever any major work is under taken by the Archaeological Survey of India then a project is prepared , estimate is sanctioned and then the required men - power for completion of that project is undertaken and other normal routine maintenance work is carried out by regular employees . Conservation Assistant Sh . Amar Nath Gupta has stated the above system of engaging casual labour: " यह sanctioned strength के आधार पर कार्य होता है व sanctioned strength खत्म होने पर सेवा स्वतः समाप्त हो जाती है । "
In cross -examination he has stated:
" casual labour में ज्यादातर साफ सफाई का कार्य होता है । वैसे सफाई हेतु Regular Staff रहता है । "
Workers Sh . Amar on the other hand has admitted " परमानेन्ट कर्मचारी बैनी , सफाई कर्मचारी , साजन , सल्लन , राम प्रसाद, कल्याण, कुल्लो आदि सफाई कर्मचारी आदि कार्यरत हैं । " These facts support the arguments of the opposite party that casual labours are engaged on sanctioned projects of purely casual nature of intermittent work . This is natural as ordinary maintenance is looked after by regular staff and whenever any extra job is required the project has to be prepared and the same has to be got approved by the competent financial authority. Only after the approval of such projects , the man power strength is approved. It is in that cases the casual labours could be engaged as it requires financial liability and without proper approval and the action of the opposite party may amount to financial irregularity.
Worker has tried to project his case as if he has been working right from the April 1996 to August , 2001 as safai karmchari . He further states that his termination was by oral orders . He could not state as to who was his appointing authority. He even does not know as to how many days are there in a year . In reply to question he answered that Conservation Assistant , Sh . Bhardwaj engaged him . Worker has not filed any appointment letter and has not produced any other evidence to support his case that he worked continuously from April , 96 to August , 2001. Worker has even not spelled as to on what date in April , 1996 he was engaged .
Management on the other hand examined Conservation Assistant , Sh . Amar Nath Gupta . This witness has categorically stated that the worker did not work in 1996 , but he ( workman ) was engaged for the first time in June , 1947 on casual basis . Sh . Amar Nath Gupta appeared with all records and proved that the worker worked as follows :
[PART II- SEC ( ii)] 1.
138 days Financial year 1997-1998
2: Financial year 1998-1999 95 days 3. Financial year 1999-2000 140.5 days 4. Financial year 2000-2001 213 days 5 . Financial year 2001-2002 79 days The management witness has also given the break up of the work for the financial year 2001-2002 which is as follows:
2001
Month April
26 days Month November 2001
26 days Month December 2001
27 days Sh . Amar Nath did come with the register and stated that the same is available for the inspection of the court and worker . He has pointed out that in the calendar ycar 2001 the worker was not engaged in the months of May, June , July. August , September and October . On specific question the witness has stated that the worker worked only in the months of February , March , April , November and December in the calendar year , 2001. In cross- examination the management witness has stated that from August 2000 to 31-7-2001 the worker did work only on 166 days .
The statement of the management witnesses is supported by government record and disproves the statement of the worker. The evidence proves that the workman has not been continuous service as has been defined in Section 25 B of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is also proved that the worker worked for intermittent period . He had never worked continuously for 240 days in a year. He was engaged as and when casual intermitted work arose .
The contention of the worker that he was terminated on 1-8-2001 is proved to be false . From the evidence it is found that if his contention is true that he was called from his house and worked in November, December in that case the date of his termination will be May, 2001. I also come to the conclusion that the case of the worker is based on false and concocted allegation . It is false to allege that he was engaged in April , 1996 and similarly false to say that he was terminated on 1-8-2001 .
Worker has tried to allege that the employer after removing engaged as many as 6 safai karamchari . He could not name any one in his examination in chief. In cross - examination he was asked the names of the persons engaged after removing him , but he replied :
" मैं उन लोगों के नाम नहीं बता सकता , जिन्हें मुझे हटाने के बाद रखा गया । " 401 [भाग li-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 8 , 2005/पौप 18, 1926
ANNEXURE
Conservation Assistant Sh . Amar Nath Gupta on the other hand has stated that :
Case No. C.G.I.T./NGP/53/2002
Dated 15-09-2004
" अमर को हटाकर दूसरे को काम पर नहीं रखा गया है । "
Shri Ishwar M. Mane-Petitioner Vs.
Thus it is also disproved that the employer has engaged any other person in place of the worker. There is no violation of provisions of Section 25 G or H of Industrial Disputes Act .
The General Manager, Telephones-Respondent AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- Section ( 1 ) and Sub- Section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute foradjudication vide order No. L-42012/ 108/94 - IR(DU) dated 9-5-95 on following schedule :
The worker has not made out a case that he attained temporary status in view of the Govt . of India office memorandum No. 51016/ 2/ 90- Ext ( C ) , Ministry of Personnel , PG & Pensions , Deptt. of Personnel & Training dated 10 September , 1993 , which provides that temporary status would be conferred on all casual labours who are in employment on the date of issue of this OM and who have rendered continuous service of 240 days . The copy of office Memorandum is in the record The worker was not on service on 10-9-1993 as casual labour and therefore the said OM is of no help to him.
This is the reference by the Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour " Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department ( Divin . Engineer , CTO Compound , Nagpur) in not providing the job to Shri Ishwar Manikrao Mane, at least from 26-08-92 onwards is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ?" On the discussion above I come to the conclusion that the worker was not retrenched/ terminated on 1-8-2001 as alleged. The question of illegality does not arise. The issue is accordingly answered. The worker is not entitled to any relief.
29-11-2004 LUCKNOW SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer
The workınan came and filed a claimed statement that he worked with R1 at 6.60 on daily wages in 1981 for 7 months . Thereafter he was transferred to R2 and there works for 6 months without any break . He was working punctually when all of a sudden he was terminated on 10-04-1985 without any notice , notice paid of retrenchment compensation . Hence he may be reinstated with full back wages , continuity of service.
नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2004
The management filed a counter that the petitioner was engaged on purely on teinporary basis and wages paid through " CONTINGENCY " head . The case is filed after 9 years he is not entitled for any relief. The petitioner examined himself as WW1 and deposed the fact mentioned in the petition . He could be cross -examined as respondent did not come .
का. आ. 121.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार ओद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./ एन.जी.पी./53/2002 ) का प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Arguments of the learned council for the petitioner were heard. He argued on the same as mentioned in the claimed petition.
[ सं. एल -42012/108/ 94- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 16th December , 2004
It may be seen that according to the petitioner he was terminated on 10-04-1985 but he approached after a gap of 9 years and the reference is dated 9-05-1995 . He is unable to satisfy the unreasonable delay in approaching the RLC. Hence I am of the opinion that if a direction is given it would meet the ends ofjustice .
In the result an Award is passed as follow :
S.O. 121. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ NGP/ 53/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court Nagpur Gow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Telecoin Deptt. and their workman , wiuch was received by the Central Government on 16-12-2004 .
R1 and R2 are hereby directed that if in future they appoint any casual or contingent labour they shall give preference to the petitioner taking his date of first appointment as 1981 , and his age as in 1981. A word of caution that it will not effect the employees already working and will apply only to future engagement of casual or contingent engagement .
[No. L - 42012/ 108 / 94 - IR (DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer
E. ISMAIL , Presiding Officer 402
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 8 , 2005 /PAUSA 18 , 1926
Witness for petitioner : Shri Ishwar M. Mane as WW 1.
Witness for respondent : Nil
Exhibits for petitioner : Nil
Exhibits for respondent: Nil
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर, 2004
का. आ. 122.- जबकि एफ सी आई के प्रबंधन के नियोजकों और उनके कामगारों के बीच एक औद्योगिक विवाद विद्यमान है जिसके संबंध में अनुसूची संलग्न है , उसे दिनांक 26-10-2004 के समसंख्यक आदेश द्वारा केंद्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 को न्यायनिर्णयन के लिए संदर्भित किया गया था । और जबकि संघ ने न्यायनिर्णयन हेतु मामले को राष्ट्रीय न्यायाधिकरण को संदर्भित करने हेतु सरकार को एक अभ्यावेदन दिया था;
और जबकि माननीय दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय ने रिट याचिका सं. 3362/2004 में याचिका की सुनवाई करते समय सरकार को याचिकाकर्ताओं के अनुरोध पर विचार करने का निदेश दिया था;
और जबकि प्रबंधन ने सूचित किया कि उन्हें इस विवाद को राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण को संदर्भित किए जाने पर कोई आपत्ति नहींहै;
और जबकि केंद्र सरकार मानती है कि उक्त विवाद का "न्यायनिर्णयन राष्ट्रीय अधिकरण द्वारा किया जाना चाहिए;
अतः , अब केंद्र सरकार औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) धारा 10 ( 1 क ) के साथ पठित , की धारा 7 ख द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतद्वारा , राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण की गठन करती है जिसका मुख्यालय कोलकाता में होगा और फिलहाल सी जी आई टी , कोलकाता के पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री एच. बनर्जी को उसका पीठासीन अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है । राष्ट्रीय अधिकरण छह माह की अवधिके भीतर अपना पंचाट देगा ।
जहां तक सरकार द्वारा इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 26-10-2004 के समसंख्यक आदेश द्वारा केंद्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण सं. 1 , नई दिल्ली को इस विवाद का मौजूदा संदर्भ दिए जाने का संबंध है , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 की धारा 10 की उप- धारा 6 ( क) के उपबंध लागू होंगे ।
अनुसूची
" क्याएफ सी आई कामगार यूनियन और एफ सी आई हैंडलिंग यूनियन की परिपत्र संख्या 4/2003 और 5/2003 की दिनांक 4-3-2003 को वापस लेने की मांग जो प्रत्यक्ष भुगतान प्रणाली कामगार और विभागीय कामगार जिनकी कार्य करते हुए या चिकित्सा आधार पर सेवानिवृत्ति के दौरान मृत्यु हो जाती है , उनके परिवार के नजदीकी व्यक्ति की अनुकम्पा आधार पर नियुक्तिकी 5 प्रतिशत की अधिकतम सीमा रखा जाना कानूनी
Printedby the Manager , Ciovt . of India Press . Ring Road . Maya Purn, New Delhi - 110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi- 110054, 2005
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] और न्यायसंगत है ? यदि हाँ, तो कामगार किस राहत का और किस तारीख से हकदार हैं ? "
[सं . एल.- 22012/400/2003- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डेस्क अधिकारी
ORDER
New Delhi , the 17th December , 2004 S.O. 122. Whereas an industrial dispute between employers in relation to management of FCI and their workmen in respect to the schedule hereto annexed was referred for adjudication to Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi vide order of even number dated 26-10-2004 .
And whercas the union made a representation to the government for referring the matter for adjudication to National Tribunal ;
And whereas the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi while hearing the petition in W.P. No. 3362/2004 has directed the government to consider the request of the petitioners;
And whereas the management intimated that they have no objection in referring the dispute to a National Industrial Tribunal ;
And whereas the Central Government is also of the opinion that the said dispute should be adjudicated by a National Tribunal ;
Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 7 B of the I.D. Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) read with Section 10 ( 1A) hereby constitutes a National Industrial Tribunal with the Head Quartersat Kolkata and appoint Sh . H. Bannerjce , presently Presiding Officer, CGIT, Kolkata as its Presiding Officer. The National Tribunal will give its award within a period of six months .
As regards the existing reference of the dispute made by the government vide this Ministry's order of even number ( dated 26-10-2004 to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 , New Delhi , the provisions of Sub - Section 6 ( a ) of Section 10 of the I.D. Act , 1947 will apply.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of FCI Workers Union and FCI Handling Workers Union for withdrawal of Circular Nos . 4/2003 & 5/2003 dated 4-3-2003 putting 5% ceiling limit to compassionate appointments of next of kin of Direct Payment System workers and Department Workers who die in harness or retire on medical grounds is legal and justified ? If yes , to what relief the workmen are entitled and from which date ?"
No. L - 22012/ 400 /2003 - IR( C - II ) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer