रजिस्ट्री सं० डी एल ( एन ) 04/ 0007/ 2003-05
REGD. No. DL (N ) 04/ 0007/ 2003-05 .
जयत भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 4 ]
No. 41
नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 16 जनवरी 22 , 2005 शनिवार पौष 26-माघ 2 , 1926
NEW DELHI , JANUARY 16 JANUARY 22 , 2005 SATURDAY/PAUSA 26- MAGHA 2 , 1926 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3-Sub - section ( ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India.
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) नईदिल्ली, 10 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 198.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग- III की अधिसूचना सं. यूओ. 72/6- पी-3/ 2004-01एचवी/ 2001 दिनांक 7-5-2004 और 334जी1/6 पी- 3-2004-15 ( 10 ) पी/2004 दिनांक 30-11-04 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से पुलिस स्टेशन हरबंसमोहाल, कानपुर शहर में भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 420/467/468/471 के अधीन 26-9-03 को दर्ज मामला अपराध सं . 187/2003 तथा भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 420/467/468/471/120- बीके अधीन 3-10-2003 को दर्ज मामला अपराध सं. 187/ए/ 2003 से संबंधित अपराधों और उक्त अपराध ( अपराधों ) से संबंधित अथवा 109 G1/ 2005
109G1/05-1
संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा पूर्वोक्त मामलों से संबंधित उसी तथ्य अथवा तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराध (अपराधों ) अथवा प्रयत्न, दुष्प्रेरणों और पड़यंत्र के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता कोविस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/48/2004- ए.वी.डी.- I[ ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS (Department of Personnct and Training) New Delhi , the 10th January. 2005
S. O. 198. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act . 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) . the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Uttar Pradesh . Hoine (Police ) Section III
(661 ) 662
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
vide Notification No. UO . 72/6- P -3 /2004-01H.B./2001 dated 7-5-2004 and 334G1/ 6 -P - 3-2004-15 ( 10) P/2004 dated 30-11-04, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation ofoffences relating to Crime No. 187/2003 u/ s 420/467/ 468/471 IPC registered on 26-09-03 at PS Harbansmohal , Kanpur city and Crime No. 187/A/2003 u/ s 420/467/468/ 471/120 -B IPC registered on 3-10-03 and any other offence( s) or attempt , abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the said offence(s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same fact or facts in relation to the aforesaid.cases.
[No. 228/48/2004-AVD. -II]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 199.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 218 पीसीआर 2004दिनांक18-11-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से श्री एम. बी. राव , मुख्य प्रबंधक ( आईएमएम ) , एलसीए - एलएसपी डिवीजन, एचएएल, बंगलौर के विरुद्ध 50,000 रुपए अदैध मरितोषण स्वीकार करने के लिए भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 7 के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों , दुष्प्ररेणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए, अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/96/2004- ए.वी.डी.- II ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January, 2005 S. O. 199.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No 25 of1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka, vide Notification No HD 218 PCR 2004 dated 18-11-2004, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation against Shri M. V. Rao . Chief Manager ( IMM), LCA -LSP Division , HAL , Bangalore under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988) for accepting illegal gratification of Rs . 50,000/-and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to . or in connection with the said offence , and any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction , or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/ 96/2004- AVD . - II ] SHUBHA THAKUR , Under Secy.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 200.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं . 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग-14 की अधिसूचना सं. 133 जीआई/6-पी-14-04-60( 24 ) 04 दिनांक 28-10-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से पुलिाद स्टेशन थाना कोतवाली, जिला गोंडा, उत्तर प्रदेश में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 283 , 279 और 304- के अधीन दर्ज मामला अपराध सं . 252/2004 तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्ही तथ्यों से अद्भुत उक्त अपगतों ग संबंधित अथवा संसक्त किसी अन्य अपराध ( अपराधों ) के अन्यंपण के लिए दिल्ली पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं ० 22865/ 2004- ए.वी.डी. -01
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सदिन New Delhi , the 11th January, 2005
S. O. 200.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 2.5 of1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Uttar Pradesh , Home (Police ) Section 1 videNotification No. 313G1/6- P - 14-04-60(24 ) 04 dated 28th October2004, hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction ofthe members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of Case crime No. 252/2004 under Sections 283, 279 and 304- Aof the Indian Panel Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at Police Station Thana Kotwali , District Gonda. Uttar Pradesh and any other offence (s) in relation to or in connection with the said offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/65/2004-AVD.-
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 201.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 198 पीसीआर 2004 दिनांक 27-10-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री अशोक माल्लया , शाखा प्रबंधक, सिंडीकेट बैंक, पर्सनल बैंकिंग ब्रांच, डिकनसन रोड, बंगलौर ( 2 ) श्री वी. एच. प्रेमानंद शेट्टी. पूर्व प्रबंधक, कार्पोरेशन बैंक और ( 3 ) श्री के. एन. मुरली एवं किसी अन्य व्यक्ति के विरुद्ध मैसर्स बीएचईएल , बंगलौर के कर्मचारियों को मांग ऋण मंजूर करने के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1960 काअधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120- वी सठित धारा 420, 468 और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 1.3 ( 1 ) ( डी) के अधीन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
दंडनीय अपराधोंऔर उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्ररेणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्लीविशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/101/2004- ए.बी.डी. -Ⅱ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 11th January, 2005 S. O. 201. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka , vide Notification No. HD 198 PCR 2004 dated 27-10-2004 , hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation in the matter of sanctioning demand loan to the employees of M/ s . BHEL, Bangalore against ( 1 ) Shri Ashok Mallya, the Branch Manager , Syndiate Bank , Personal Banking Branch, Dickenson Road , Bangalore (2) Shri V. H. Premanda Shetty, Former Manager , Corporation Bank and (3 ) Shri K. N. Murali and any other person for the offences punishable under Sections 120 - B read with 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and section 13 (2) read with 13 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988) and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the offence mentioned above or any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction , or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228/ 101/2004 - AVD . - IIJ
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 202 केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनिनम , 1946 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 232 पीसीआर 2004 दिनांक 08-12-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की सहमति से ( 1 ) श्री नागेश वी. गोकर्ण, तत्कालीन प्रबंधक, यूको बैंक, देवांगेरे शाखा ( 2 ) श्री आर. शिवकुमार, तत्कालीन प्रबंधक, यूको बैंक, देवांगेरे शाखा ( 3 ) श्री एस. एच. सिद्दाप्पा, तत्कालीन सहायक प्रबंधक, यूको बैंक, देवांगेरे शाखा ( 4 ) श्री मुरलीधर बहल, प्रबंध निदेशक, मैसर्स श्रीराम ऑटो हाउस प्राइवेट लिमिटेड ( 5 ) श्री लक्ष्मी नारायण बहल, निदेशक, मैसर्स श्रीराम ऑटो हाउस प्राइवेट लिमिटेड ( 6 ) श्री श्रीकंठ कुलकर्णी, प्रबंधक, मैसर्स श्रीराम ऑटो हाउस प्राइवेट लिमिटेड और (7 ) श्री जी. बी. धन्य कुमार, प्रबंधक, मैसर्स श्रीराम ऑटो हाउस प्राइवेट लिमिटेड एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध यूको बैंक, बंगलौर द्वारा प्राइवेट फर्म को 10 लाख रुपये नकद की भारी ऋण राशि की मंजूरी के मामले में उनके त्रुटिपूर्ण कृत्यों के लिए
663 भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1980 ( 1980 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120- बी सपठित धारा 420, 468 471 और 477 - ए तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49 ) की धारा 1.3 (2) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( सी) और ( डी) के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्ररेजों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/103/2004- ए.वी.डी.- II ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January, 2005
S. O. 202. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka, vide Notification No. HD 232 PCR 2004 dated 8-12-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for investigation of offence punishable under Sections 120 -B readwith 420, 468 , 471 and 477 -A of the indian Penal Code. 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and section 13 ( 2 ) read with 13(1)(c) and (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988) against ( 1 ) Shri Nagesh , V. Gokarna , the thenManager , UCO Bank, Davangere Branch ( 2 ) Shri R. Shivakumar, the then Mann. UCO Bank, Davangere Branch (3 ) Shri S. H. Siddapp , the then Assistant Manager, UCOBank, Davangere Branch (4) Shri Muralidhar Behai . Managing Director , M/s . Sriram Auto House Private Limited (5 ) Shri Lakshmi Narayan Behal , Director, M/s . Sriram Aute House Private Limited (6) Shri Srikanth Kulkarni , Manager, M/ s . sriram Auto House Private Limited (7) Shri G. B. Dhanya Kumar, Manager , M/s. Sriram Auto House Private Limited and any other public servants orpersons for their fraudulent acts in the matter of sanction ofmega cash loan ofRs . 10 lakh by UCO Bank, Bangalore toPrivate firm and attempts , betments and conspiracies in relation to , or in connection with the offences , and any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction , or arising out of the same facts .
No. 228/103 /2004 - AVD. - II) SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 203.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. एचडी 184 पीसी 2004दिनांक26-10-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त कर्नाटक राज्य सरकार से श्री के. वी. मुरली, सहायक, नैशनल इंश्योरेंस लं 664
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
डिविजन- V, यूनिटबिल्डिंग एनेक्सी, मिशन रोड, बंगलौर एवं किन्हीं अन्य लोक सेवकों अथवा व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध वाणिज्यिक और गैर- वाणिज्यिक वाहनों की बीमा पालिसी से संबंधित लोक निधियों में जालसाजी और दुर्विनियोग के मामले में भास्तीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 409 , 420 , 468, 477 - ए और 201 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं . 49 ) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( सी ) एवं ( डी) के अधीन मामले के पंजीकरण और उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त षडयंत्र प्रयत्न और दुष्प्ररेणा तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए, उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/94/2004- ए.बी.डी.- II ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January, 2005
S. O. 203. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) . the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Karnataka, vide Notification No. HD 184 PCR 2004 dated 26-10-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Karnataka for the registration of the case and investigation against Shri K. V. Murali , Assistant , National Insurance Company Limited, Division - V, Unity Building Annexe, MissionRoad, Bangalore and any other public servants or persons in the matter of falsification and misappropriation of public funds relating to insurance policies of commercial and non- commerdcial vehicles under Sections 409 , 420 , 468 , 477 -A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 13 (2 ) read with 13 (1 ) (c) and (d) of Prevention ofCorruption Act , 1988 ( Act No. 49 of 1988) and conspiracy. attempts and abetment in connection with the said offences and any other offences committed in the course of the same transaction , arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228 /94/2004- AVD . - II]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 204.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार के गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग- III की अधिसूचना सं. 139 जी 1/6- पी- 3-2004-15( 76 ) पी/04 दिनांक 3 सितंबर, 2004 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से मैसर्स सिस्टोचेम लेवोरेट्रिज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, लोनी, गाजियाबाद के विरुद्ध दवाओं और औषधियों का अप्राधिकृत रूप से निर्माण करने के लिए भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1960 ( 1960 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 420, 467, 468 , 471 और 477 - ए तथा औषधि और प्रसाधन सामग्री अधिनियम, 1940 ( 1940 का अधिनियम सं. 23 ) की धारा 27 के साथ पठित धारा 18 के अधीन मामले में और उक्त उपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयासों, दुष्प्ररेणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध/अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं ० 228/75/2004- ए.बी.डी.- II ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th January , 2005 S. O. 204. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Uttar Pradesh , Home (Police ) Section - III vide Notification No. 139GI/6 - P - 3-2004-15 (76 )P/04 dated 3rd September 2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation against M/ s Systochem Laboratories Private Limited , Loni , Ghaziabad under Sections 420, 467 , 468, 471 and 477 - A of the India Panel Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 18 read with Section 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act , 1940 (Act No. 23 of 1940) for unauthorized manufacturing of medicines and drugs and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation or in in connection with the said offences of any other offence/ offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/75 /2004- AVD . -II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 205.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की दिनांक 09-08-2004 की गृह (एस.सी.ए. ) विभाग की अधिसूचना जी. ओ. एम. संख्या 191 द्वारा प्राप्त आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य सरकार की सहमति से तेलुगु दैनिक आन्ध्र भूमि के रिपोर्टर श्री वीरबोइना यादगिरि की हत्या के मामले में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 (1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 34 के साथ पठित धारा 302 के अधीन मेडक टाउन पुलिस थाना , मेडक लिजा, आन्ध्र प्रदेश में दर्ज आपराधिक मामला संख्या 22/2004 के अधीन दंडनीय अपराधों और उक्त उपराधों से संबंधित प्रयासों , दुष्प्ररेणों तथा षडयंत्रों एवं अथवा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/32/2004 - ए.जी.डी.- II ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/ माघ 2 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 12th January, 2005 S. O. 205. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide Home (SC.A) Department Notification G.O. Ms. No. 191 dated 9-8-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Andhra Pradesh for investigation into the case of murder of Shri Veeraboina Yadagiri . Reporter of Andhra Bhoomi Telugu Daily registered in Crime No. 22/2004 of Medak Towri Police Station . Medak District, Andhra Pradesh under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the said offence and any other offences committed in the course of the saine transaction or arising out of the same fact or facts.
[No. 228/32 /2004- AVD . - II ] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 206.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तरांचल राज्य सरकार के गृह विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. 1920/xx ( 1 )/196/पी पी एस/2003 देहरादून दिनांक 23 अक्तूबर, 2004 द्वारा प्राप्त उत्तरांचल राज्य सरकार की सहमति से पुलिस स्टेशन कोतवाली हरिद्वार में भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 364 के अधीन दर्ज मामला सं. 991/2003 दिनांक 12-10-2003 तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत उक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्तकिसी अन्य अपराध के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तरांचल राज्य पर करती है ।
[सं० 228/108/2003- ए.वी.डी.- II ] शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th January, 2005 S. O. 206. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) . the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Uttranchal vide Notification No. 1920 /XX ( 1) / 196 /PPS/2003 Dehradun dated 23-10-2004 , hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttranchal for investigation of crime Case No. 991/2003, dated 12-10-2003 registered at PS Kotwali , Haridwar u/ s 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and attempts, abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the offence mentioned above and any other offences
665 committed in the course of the same transaction arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/ 108/2003 -AVD. - II] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 207.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की गृह ( पुलिस ) अनुभाग-12 कोदिनांक 30-9-2004 की अधिसूचना सं . जी-1-76/6-12-04-2 ( 66 )डी/04 लखनऊ के द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से आगरा स्थित सदर बाजार पुलिस स्टेशन में भारतीय दंड संहिता 1860 की धारा 419/420 के अंतर्गत दर्ज प्रथम सूचना रिपोर्ट संख्या 337/2004 जो जापानी राष्ट्रिक सुश्री क्योको ताकेहाना के साथ मैसर्स ओरिएण्टल क्राफ्ट, आगरा द्वारा की गई जालसाजी की घटना से संबंधित है, की जांच के लिए और उक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों की अथवा उपर्युक्त अपराध से संबंधित पड्यंत्रों, दुष्प्रयत्नों और दुष्प्रेरणों की जाँच के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों के कार्य क्षेत्र तथा अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश करती है ।
[सं० 228/38/2004- ए.वी.डी. - 11 ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th January, 2005 S. O. 207. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Dellu Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Uttar Pradesh vide Home (Police) Section 12Notification No. G- 1-76/6-12-04-2 (66) D/04 Lucknow, dated 30-9-2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of FIR No. 337/2004 under Sections 419/ 420 of Indian Penal Code 1860 registered at Police Station Sadar Bazar, Agra, Uttar Pradesh pertaining to the incident of fraud committed against Ms. Kyoko Takehana , a Japanese national by M / s . Oriental Craft . Agra conspiracies, attempts and abetinents in relation to or in connection with the said offence committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts in relation to the aforesaid case.
[No. 228/38/2004- AVD . - II ] SHUBHA THAKUR , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 208.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्लीविशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल राज्य सरकार के गृह (जे ) विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. 69894/जे2/2003/होम दिनांक 10-8-2004 द्वारा प्राप्त केरल राज्य सरकार THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II -SEC. 3 (1 ) को सहमति से केरल काडर के भारतीय वन सेवा के अधकारी और आंध्र प्रदेश में जिला कृष्णा के निवासी श्री के. भास्माकर राव के विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 ( 1988 का अधिनियम सं. 49) की धारा 13 ( 2 ) सपठित धारा 13 ( 1 ) ( ई ) के अधीन अपराधों और उक्त अपराधों से संबंधित उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हों तथ्यों से उदभूत प्रयत्नों. दष्प्रेरणों और षड्यंत्रों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्या शिक्षण एलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारित का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य पा करती है ।
[सं० 228/70/2004-२.के.डा.- II ]
Kerala Home ( J) Department vide Notification No. 601411/ J2/04/Home dated 2nd November 2004 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for investigation of the offences involved as ( 1 ) Crime No. 188/2004 of Kumarakom Police Station and ( 2 ) Crime No. 663/2004 ofThiruvaha Police Station, Kottayam and attempts, abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentiomieau above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction arising out of the same facts.
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th January, 2005
[No. 228/88/2004-AVD. - II ] SHUBHA THAKUR , Under Secy
नईदिल्ली, 14 जनवरी, 2005
1 S. O. 208.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ), the Central Government with the consent of Government of Kerala Home ( J ) Department vide Notification No. 69894/J2/2003 /Home dated 10-8-2004, bereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for investigation of offence under Section 13 (2 ) read with Section 13 ( 1 )( e) of the Prevention ofCorruption Act , 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988) against Shri K Bhasmakara Rao, an India Forest Service Officer in the Kerala Cadre and a native of Krishna district in Andhra Pradesh and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to the above office committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[No. 228/70/2004- AVD. - II]
SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy.
का.आ. 210.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिम स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं . 25 ) की धारा ८ के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल सरकार के गृह ( जे ) विभाग की दिनांक 24 अगमा, 2004कीअधिसूचना सं. 7235/जे 2/04/गृह के द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से मारायूर पुलिस स्टेशन , इडुकी के एक व्यक्ति की गुमशुदगी की शिकागत केअधीन दर्ज अपराध संख्या 9/2002 जिसे अपराध शाखा ( आपराधिक अनुसंधान विभाग ) , इडुकी ने अपराध संख्या 132/ सी.आर./2002 के रूप में पुनर्संख्यांकित किया है, की जाँच के लिए और उक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों की अथवा उपर्युक्त अपराध सेसंबंधित षड्यंत्रों, प्रयासों, दुष्प्रेरणाओं की जाँच के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों कार्य क्षेत्र तथा अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य में करती है ।
नईदिल्ली, 14 जनवरी , 2005
[सं० 228/74/2004 - ए.बी.डी.- II ]
शुभाठाकुर, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 14th January , 2005 का.आ. 209.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशेप पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल राज्य सरकार के गृह (जे ) विभाग की दिनांक 2 नवम्बर, 2004 की अधिसूचना सं. 60144/जे2/04/गृह के अंतर्गत दी गई सहमति से ( 1 ) अपराध संख्या 188/2004, कुमाोम पुलिस स्टेशन तथा ( 2 ) अपराध संख्या 663/2004 थिरुवल्लिया पुलिस स्टेशन कोट्टायम के तथा उक्त अपराध अथवा अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराध या अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य पर करती है।
[सं० 228/88/2004- ए.वी.डी.- II ]
शुभा ठाकुर, अवर सचिव
New Delhi the 14th January, 2005
S. O. 210. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act. 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) . the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Kerala Home (J) Department vide Notification No. 7235/ J2/04/Home dated 24th August , 2004. hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for investigation of offences involved in Crime No. 9/2002 under complaint of Man missing of Marayoor Police Station , Idukki which was renumbered as Crime No. 132/CR/2002 of Crime Branch (Criminal Investigation Department ) , Idukki and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the said offences , and any other offences committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts of the above said Crime Number.
S. O. 209.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of State Government of
[No. 228/74/2004- AVD. -II ] SHUBHA THAKUR, Under Secy 667
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माष 2 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
वित्त मंत्रालय ( राजस्व विभाग) नई दिल्ली, 4 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 211.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में राजस्व विभाग के अधीन केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :-
केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क आयुक्त का कार्यालय आदर्श धाम बिल्डिग, वापी दमन रोड, धापी-39619
[ फा. सं. 11013 ( 01 ) 2005 - हिन्दी -2 ] सौरभ चन्द्र , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi , the 4th January, 2005
S.O. 211. In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official purpose of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the Board of Central Excise and Customs, Departinent of Revenue the 80% staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi.
Office of the Commissioner Customs and Central Excise , Adarsh Dhaın Building . Vapi Daman Road , Vapi - 39619
[F. No. 11013 (01 ) 2005 -Hindi - 2 ] SAURABH CHANDRA , Jt . Secy. आदेश नई दिल्ली, 4 जनवरी , 2005 स्टाम्प
का.आं. 212. भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम , 1899 ( 1899 का 2. ) की धारा 9 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा भारत ओवरसीज बैंक लिमिटेड, चेन्नई को मात्र दस लाख रुपये का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्क अदाकरने कीअनुमति प्रदान करती है, जो उक्त बैंक द्वारा जारी किये जाने वाले मात्र चालीस करोड़ रुपये के समय मूल्य के वचनप्रत्र के रूप में 400 असुरक्षित विमोच्य गैर- परिवर्तनीय गौण बंधपत्रों (टायर- II बंधपत्रों) पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।
[सं . 2/2005 - स्यम्य फा, सं 33/49/2004-बि.क. ] आर.जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव
ORDER New Delhi, the 4th January, 2005 STAMPS
S.O. 212. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899 ) , the Central Government hereby permits Bharat Overseas Bank Limited, Chennai to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees ten lakh only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on 400 Unsecured Redeemable Non - Convertibie Subordinated Bonds (Tier II bonds ) in the nature of promissory notes aggregating to rupees forty crore only, to be issued by the said Bank .
[No. 2 /2005 - STAMP F. No. 33/49/2004 - ST R.G. CHHABRA, Under Secy . (आर्थिक कार्य विभाग)
(बैंकिग प्रभाग) नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 213.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 (1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 और 15( 1 ) के उपबंध, इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से पांच वर्ष की अवधिके लिए पंजाब नैशनल बैंक पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।
[फा. सं. 11 /29/2004-बी ओ ए.] डी.पी. भारद्वाज, अवर सचि (Department of Economic Affairs) (BANKING DIVISION) New Delhi , the 10th January , 2005 S.O. 213. Іn exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Banking Regulation Act , 1949 (10 of 1949 ) the Central Government , on the recommendation of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of Sections 13 and 15 ( 1 ) of the said Act shall not apply for a period of five years from the date of this Notification to Punjab National Bank.
[F. No. 11 /29/2004-BOA] D.P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 214.- राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक के निदेशक के रूप में नामित निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों की नामांकन अवधि को 31-5-2004 से 26-11-2004 तक बढ़ाती है । 668
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1. डा. अमृता पटेल, अध्यक्ष, राष्ट्रीय डेयरी विकास बोर्ड, आनंद ।
राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के साथ पठित धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में ।
-तदैव-
2. प्रो . विजय शंकर व्यास, प्रोफेसर इमेरिट्स, इंन्स्टीच्यूट ऑफ डेवल्पमेंट स्टडीज, जयपुर ।
[फा.सं. 7/4/2004- बीओ -1 ] रमेश बन्द, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th January , 2005 S.O. 214. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act , 1981 , the Central Government , hereby extend the period of nomination of the following persons as Directors of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development beyond 31-05-2004 and upto 26-11-2004.
1. Dr. Amrita Patel Chairman. National Dairy Development Board , Anand .
Inpursuance of clause ( c) of Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 read with Sub - section ( 2) of Section 7 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act, 1981 .
-do-
2. Prof. Vijay Shankar. Vyas Professor Emeritus , Institute of Development Studies. Jaipur.
[F.No. 7 /4/2004 -BO.I ] RAMESH CHAND , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 215.- भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ( अनुषंगी बैंक ) अधिनियम, 1959 ( 1959 का 38 ) की धारा 26 की उप- धारा ( 2 क ) के साथ पठित धारा 25 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( गख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एसोसिएट बैंक आफिसर्स एसोसिएशन : यूनिट स्टेट बैंक आफ त्रावणकोर के सचिव , श्री आर ० श्रीराज को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 3 वर्ष की अवधि और उसके बाद उनके उत्तराधिकारी के नामित किए जाने की तारीख तक अथवा स्टेट बैंक आफ त्रावणकोर में उनके अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त नहीं रहने पर, या अगला आदेश होने तक जो भी पहले हो, स्टेट बैंक आफ त्रावणकोर के निदेश मण्डल में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है बशर्ते कि वे छः वर्ष से अधिक की अवधि तक लगातार पद धारण नहीं करेंगे ।
[फा.सं. 8/2/2004- बीओ -1 ] रमेश चन्द, अवर सचिव
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 12th January , 2005 S.O. 215. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( cb ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 25 read with Sub -section (2A) of Section 26 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act , 1959 ( 38 of 1959) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri R. Sreeraj . Secretary, Associate Banks' Officers Association , Unit: State Bank ofTravancore as Officer Employee Director on the Board ofDirectors of State Bank of Travancore for a period of three years from the date of notification and thereafter until his successor has been nominated or until he ceases to be an officer of State Bank of Travancore , or until further orders , whichever is the earliest , provided he shall not hold office continuously for a period exceeding six years.
[F.No. 8 /2/2004 - BO - .1 RAMESH CHAND, Under Secy.
संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (दूरसंचार विभाग) (राजभाषाअनुसरण ) नई दिल्ली, 13 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 216.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभापा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 ( यथा संशोधन 1987 ) के नियम 10 (4 ) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, दूर संचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:-
1. मुख्य लेखा अधिकारी का कार्यालय , तार जांच कार्यालय , भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, पश्चिम बंगाल परिमंडल, कोलकाता । 2. मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार भंडार कार्यालय , भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, दूरसंचार भंडार सर्किल, उए, चौरंगी प्लेस, कोलकाता-13
[सं. ई. 11016/1 /2004- रा . भा. ] हरीश चन्द्र जयाल , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Department of Telecommunications) (O.L. Section) New Delhi , the 13th January , 2005
S.O. 216. In pursuance of rule 10(4 ) of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 ( as amended- 1987) , the Central Government hereby notifies the following Offices under the administrative control ofMinistry of Communications and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications where [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
669
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी , 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
of more than 80% of staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :
1. Office of the Chief Accounts Officer , Telegraph Inspection Office , BSNL , West Bengal Circle, Kolkata .
2. Chief General Manager . Telecom . Store Office, BSNL, Telecom . Store Circle, 3 A, Chauranghi Place, Kolkata - 13 .
[No. E. - 11016/ 1 / 2004- (O.L . ) ] HARISH CHANDRA JAYAL, Jt . Secy .
स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यविभाग )
(पी.एम.एस. अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 217.-दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भांग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-
2. डा. एम.जी.आर. मेडिकल विश्वविद्यालय , टी. एन. चैन्नई के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 34 के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अधीन श्री मुकाम्बिका इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेंटल साईंसिज, कुलशेखरम , तमिलनाडु के संबंध में इसके अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी: -
X. श्री मुकाम्बिका इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेंटल साईंसिज, कुलशेखरम, तमिलनाडु
( i ) बैचलर ऑफ. डेंटल सर्जरी (यदि 18-6-2004 को अथवा इसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो)
बी.डी. एस. ( तमिलनाडु डॉ. एमपीजीआर मेडिकल विश्वविद्यालय, चैन्नई)
[सं. वी.- 12017/42/97- पी.एम.एस. ] ए. के. सिंह , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health) (P.M.S. Section)
New Delhi , the 30th December , 2004 S.O. 217. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act . 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Sechedule to the said Act . namely:--
2. Under the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 34 , in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act . 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to Dr. M.G.R. 109 GI/ 05-2
Medical University , T.N. , Chennai , the following entires in respect of Srce Mookambika Institute of Dental Sciences , Kulasekharam , Tamil Nadu shall be inserted thereunder:-
X. Sree Mookambika Institute of Dental Sciences, Kulasekharam , Tamil Nadu
BDS ( Tamil Nadu
Dr. MGR Medical ( i ) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (Whengranted on or after 18-6-2004 )
University, Chennai )
[No. V- 12017 /42/ 97 -PMS ]
A. K. SINGH , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 218.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु इंडियाना यूनिवर्सिटी, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसन; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हताहै;
और, डॉ. अशोक भाष्करण पिल्लै, अमेरिकी नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है, अमृता इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल सांइसेज, अमृता लेन, एलमक्करा कोच्चि-682026 से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं ;
अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है किभारत में डॉ. अशोक भाष्करण पिल्लै द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधिः-
(क) 1 अक्तूबर, 2004 से आगे छह माह की अवधिः अथवा (ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा. अशोक भाष्करण पिल्ले, अमृता इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइंसेज, अमृता लेन, एलमक्करा , कोच्चि से जुड़े हैं , इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी । [संख्या वी-11016/ 1/2004 - एम ई (नीति -1 ) ] पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचित्र New Delhi , the 11th January , 2005 S.O. 218. Whereas medical qualification Doctor of Medicine granted by Indiana University , USA. is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act . 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act :
And whereas Dr. Ashok Bhaskaran Pillai , American national who possess the said qualification is attached to Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences . Amrita Lane . Elamakkara Kochi - 682026 for charitable work and not for personal gain:
Now , therefore, in pursuance of elause (c ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Governinent hereby specifics that the period of practice ofmedicine by Dr. Ashok Bahaskaran Pillai in India shall be limited to :~
( a) a period of six months from 1 October, 2004 onwards; or 670
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
(b) the period during which Dr. Ashok Bhaskaran Pillai isattached to Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences , Amrita Lane , Elamakkara, Kochi whichever is shorter.
[No. V- 11016 / 1 /2004 - ME(Policy - I) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 219.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु मांट्रियल यूनिवर्सिटी, कनाडा द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसीन; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
और, डॉ० बर्नार्ड कोरज्जा, कनाडा के नागरिक , जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है, अमृता इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइंसेज एंड रिसर्च, एलमक्करा, पी.ओ. कोचीन से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न किव्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं;
अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डॉ० बर्नार्ड कोरज्जा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधिः-
(क) नवम्बर, 2004 से आगे 8 माह की अवधि; अथवा ( ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डॉ. बर्नार्ड कोरज्जा, जुड़े हैं , अमृता इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइंसेज एण्ड रिचर्स , एलमक्करा , पी.ओ. कोचीन इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी । [संख्या वी-11016/1/ 2004- एम ई ( नीति -1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2005 S.O. 219. Whereas medical qualification Doctor of Medicine granted by Montreal University , Canada is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act:
And whereas Dr. Bernard Corazza , Canadian national , who possess the said qualification is attachedto Amrita Instt . of Medical Sciences and Research , Elamakkara P.O. Cochin for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore , in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Bernard Corazza in India shall be limited to: -
( a) a period of eight months from November 2004 onwards; or
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (b) the period during which Dr. Bernard Corazza is attached to Amrita Instt. of Medical Sciences and Research , Elamakkara P.O. Cochin, whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/ 1 /2004 -ME (Policy - I ) ] P. G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 220.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु हैम्बर्ग यूनिवर्सिटी, जर्मनी द्वारा प्रदान चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसीन; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
और, डॉ. जिप्पेल जर्गेन , जर्मन के नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है, पेटेंजीमीनचैफ्ट फार हंगरी चिल्ड्रन, रजि. , कोलेंचरी , एर्नाकुलम (केरल ) से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं;
अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डॉ. जिप्पेल जर्गेन द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधिः-
(क) अक्तूबर, 2004 से आगे छह माह की अवधि; अथवा ( ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डॉ. जिप्पेल जर्गेन . पेटेंजीमीनचैफ्ट फार हंगरी चिल्ड्रन रजि. , कोलेंचरी , एर्नाकुलम ( केरल) से जुड़े हैं, इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी । [ संख्या बी-11016/ 1 / 2004 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ]
पी. जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिन New Delhi , the 11th January , 2005 S.O. 220. Whereas medical qualification Doctor of Medicine granted by Hamburg University, Gerinany is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the IndianMedical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act ;
Andwhereas Dr. Zippel Jurgen , a German national who possess the said qualification is attached to Patengemeinschaft for Hungry Children Regd . Kolenchery . Ernakulam (Kerala ) for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Zippel Jurgen in India shall be limited to :-
( a) a period six months from October 2004 onwards; or
(b) the period during which Dr. Zippel Jurgen is attached to Petengemenischaft fof Hungry Children Regd.. Kolenchery , Ernakulam ( Kerala ) , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1 / 2004- ME (Policy - 1) ]
P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
671
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 221.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु मलाया यूनिवर्सिटी, मलेशिया द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम बी पी एस; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;
ओ, डा. मुरूगासु परमसोती, मलेशिया के नागरिक, जिनके रुपय अर्हता है , श्री सत्य साई इंस्टीटेंयूट ऑफ हायर मेडिकल नाइसेज, बैंगलोर से धमार्थ ( चेरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लोभ ठेतु जुड़े हैं;
अतः , अत्ब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. मुरुगासु पद्मसोती द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधि:-
( क) अक्तूबर, 2004 से आगे छह माह की अवधिः अथवा ( ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा. मुरूगासु परमसोती श्री सत्य साई इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ हायर मेडिकल सांइसेज , बैंगलोर से जुड़े हैं, इनमें से जो भी कम हो, तक सीमित रहेगी ।
[ संख्या दो-11016/ 1/2004 - एम ई ( नीति -1 ) ]
पी.जी. कलाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2005 S.O. 221. Whereas medical qualification MBBS of University of Malaya , Malaysia is a recognised medical qualification for purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act;
And whereas Dr. Murugasu Paramsothy, Malaysian national who possess the said qualification is attached to Sn Sathya Sai Instiinte of Higher Medical Sciences , Bangalore for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Murugasu Paramsothy in India shall be limited to
(a) a period of six months from October, 2004 onwards: or
( b) the period during which Dr. Murugasu Paramsothy is attached to Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences , Bangalore , whichever is nhorter.
[ No. V- 11016 / 1 / 2004 -ME(Policy - 1 ) ] P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 222.--भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजन हेतु शेन्डोंग विश्वविद्यालय, चीन द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता एम. डी.; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;
और, डा. डी काई स्ली , चीनी नागरिक, जिनके पास उक्त अर्हता है , एशियन हार्ट इंस्टीट्यूट, बांद्रा ( पूर्व ) मुम्बई से धर्मार्थ ( चैरिटेबल ) कार्य हेतु और न कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ हेतु जुड़े हैं ;
अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ग ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकारे एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. डी काई ली द्वारा आयुर्विज्ञान की प्रैक्टिस करने की अवधिः-
(क ) सितम्बर, 2004 से आगे छह माह की अवधि; अथवा (ख ) उस अवधि जिसके दौरान डा. डी काई ली, एशियन हार्ट इंस्टीट्यूट, बांद्रा ( पूर्व ) मुम्बई से जुड़े हैं, इनमें से जो भी कम हो. तकसीमित रहेगी ।
[संख्या वी-11016/1/2004 - एम ई ( नीति-1) ]
पी.जी. कलाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2005 S.O. 222. Whereas medical qualification M.D. granted by Shandong University, China is a recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the saidAct,
And whereas Dr. De Cai Li , Chinese national who possess the said qualification is attached to ASIAN Heart Institute , Bandra (East ) , Mumbai for the purpose of charitable work and not for personal gain:
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1) of the Section 14 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. De Cai Li in India shall be limited to :-
(a) a period of six months from September, 2004 onwards; or
(b) the period during which Dr. De Cai Li is attached to ASIAN Heart Institute , Bandra (East) . Mumbai , whichever is shorter .
[No. V- 11016/1 /2004 - ME( Policy- 1 ) ] P.G. KALADHARAN , Under Secy.
पर्यटनमंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी, 2005
का.आ. 223.- सार्वजनिक परिसर ( अप्राधिकृत दखलकारों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों और दिनांक 18 अप्रैल , 1987 को भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित पर्यटन मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की अधिसचूना सं. का.आ. 1034दिनांक 30 मार्च, 1987 का अधिक्रमण करते हुए, ऐसे अधिक्रमण से पूर्व किए गए लोप करने वाले, जैसे को छोड़कर, भारत इसके द्वारा नीचे की सारणी के स्तंभ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधि सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के बराबर रैंक के अधिव 672
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
नाते इस अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए संपदा अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्तकरती है और उक्त सारणी के स्तंभ ( 2 ) में तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट सार्वजनिक परिसर की स्थानीय सीमाओं को भी परिभाषित करती है, जिम्में उक्त संपदा अधिकारी उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा या उसके अधीन संपदा अधिकारों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा और सौंपे गए कार्यों को करेगा ।
सारणी
अधिकारी का पदनाम सार्वजनिक परिसरों और क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाओं की श्रेणियां 7
2
वरिष्ठ प्रबंधक ( एस्टेट ) , भारत पर्यटन विकास निगम लिमिटेड, जोवन विहार बिल्डिंग, 3 संसद मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110001
सभी परिसर जो भारत पर्यटन विकास निगम लिमिटेड के हैं या उनके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए हैं और दिल्ली, जम्मूऔर कश्मीर, हरियाण्णा, पंजाब , हिमाचल प्रदेश, उत्तर प्रदेश , उत्तरांचल, मध्य प्रदेश , राजस्थान , छत्तीसगढ़ और चंडीगढ़ संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में स्थित हैं ।
[फा. सं. 6/21 /91 - पी एस यू ( टी ) ]
रेनूजैन, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF TOURISM
New Delhi , the 7th January, 2005
S.O. 223. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants ) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) and in supersession of the Notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Tourism . No. S.O. 1034 dated, the 30th March , 1987 published in the Gazette of India dated, 18th April , 1987 , except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession . the Central Govenrment hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column ( 1) of the table below, being the officer equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officer of the Government to be the Estate Officer for the purposes of the said Act and also defines the local limit of public premises, asspecified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Table, in respect of which the said Estate Officer shall exercise the powers conferred , and perforın duties imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act .
TABLE
Designation of the Officer
Categories ofpublic premises and local limits of the jurisdiction
(1)
(2)
All premises belonging to or taken on lease by India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and situated Senior Manager ( Estate) , India Tourism Develop- ment Corporation Ltd. , Jeevan Vihar Building,
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
(2)
(1)
3 Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001
in the States of Delhi , Jammu and Kashmir , Haryana , Punjab , Himachal Pradesh . Uttar Pradesh . Uttaranchal . Madhya Pradesh , Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Union Territory of Chandigarh.
[F. No. 6/21/91 - PSU( T) RENU JAIN , Under Secy.
पोत-परिवहन, सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय
(पोत-परिवहन विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 224.- राष्ट्रीय नौवहन बोर्ड-नियमावली, 1960 के नियम 3 और 4 के साथ पठित वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 (1958 का 44 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 10 सितम्बर, 2003 की अधिसूचना सं. एस एस -18011/ 1/03 - एस एल में, एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ।
राष्ट्रीय नौवहन- बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में नामांकन के बारे में दिनांक 10 सितम्बर, 2003 की उक्त अधिसूचना में क्रम सं. 14 में विद्यमान प्रविष्टि को निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टि से प्रतिस्थापित किया जाए, अर्थात्:
" 14. श्री वाई डी. खटाऊ,
उपाध्यक्ष, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय पोत- स्वामी संघ। "
[फा. सं. एस एस -18011/1/2003 - एस एल- खंड- II ]
वी. पी. राणा, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF SHIPPING , ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
(Department of Shipping)
New Delhi , the 10th January, 2005 S.O. 224. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958 ) read with Rule 3 and 4 of the National Shipping Board Rules, 1960 , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in this Ministry's Notification No. SS- 18011 / 1 /2003 - SL dated 10th September, 2003 .
Inthe said notification dated 10th September, 2003 regarding nomination as a member to the National Shipping Board for the existing entry at Sl . No. 14 , the following entry shall be substituted , namely :-
" 14. Shri Y. D. Khatau , Vice- President , INSA "
[F. No. SS - 18011 / 1 /2003 - SL - Vol . - II ]
V. P. RANA , Under Secy.
673
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्ता मामलेविभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 225,-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यधार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कार्तिकेय एन्टरप्राइजेज, सी-27/2 , गली नं ० 1/2, भजनपुरा , थाना रोड, भजनपुरा, नई दिल्ली-110053 विनिर्मित गणक मशीन के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " कार्तिकेय " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/127 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक गणक मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन की गणक मशीन भी होंगी जो 500 ग्रा. से 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता की रेंज वाली हैं ।
[ फा.सं ० डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 92 ) /2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 674
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
PART I-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
New Delhi , the ? Ist December, 2004
5.0 . 225. Whereas the Central Government , alter considering the report submitted to it by the prescribai authority,is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with u provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Meatures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to mantain its accuracy over penods af sustained use and to render accurate service under vaned conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act the Central Government hereby issues and publisites the certificate of approval of the model of a counter machine with brand name " KARTIKAY" ( herein reforred to as the model ) , manufactured by M/ s Kartikay Enterprises, C- 27 /2 , Gali No 1/2 , Bhajanpura Thana Road, Bhajanpura , New Delhi - 110053 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 04/127.
The said modei is a counter machine , Its maximusi capacity is 10kg
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of the said Section , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the counter machine of similar make. accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 500g to 50 kg , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model have been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 (92 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 675
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का .. 220.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि अत रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माय मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप नानक (पाडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उका अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए गैसर्ग डीलक्स स्केल इण्डस्ट्रीज , । धात्री टेनमेन्टप्स, टक्करबापा नगर रोड, लाभस्थ सोसायटी के निकट, अहमदाबाद -380050, गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित सवार्थत्ता यथार्थता वर्ग -2 ) वाले " डी टी जे -15 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के माहल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डीलक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुग्टेदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2004/167 मनदेशित किया गया है . अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त माडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत्र प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक लागोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वाल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारः विद्युत प्रदान पर कार्य करल है ।
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीज़बन्द भी ि और कन्द्राय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपण करती है कि उक्त माडल के अमुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिमाता द्वारा उसः सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुमार और उसी सामग्री स जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही येक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 ×10 के या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 38 )/2003 )
पी. ए. कृष्णाभूति, निमक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 676
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( il ) ]
New Delhi , the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 226. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a non - automatic weigh- ing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " DTJ- 15 " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "DELUX" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Delux Scale Industries, No. 1 , Dhatri Tenaments . Thakkarbapa Nagar Road , Near Labhrath Society , Ahmedabad - 380050 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/ 167;
The said model ( see the figure given above ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 50g. The verfication scale inter- val ( e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said inodel shall also cover the weighing instru- ments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k , or 5 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 38 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 677 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 227.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डीलक्स स्केल इण्डस्ट्रीज, 1 धात्री टेनमेन्टस, ठक्करबापा नगर रोड, लाभस्थ सोसायटी के निकट, अहमदाबाद-380050 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डी पी एफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डीलक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2004/169 सम्मनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम श्रमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10*, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 (38)/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 G1/05-3 678
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . JANUARY 22, 2005 / MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC.3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 227. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed anthority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures(Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its aecuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Cemral Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weigh- ing instruinent (Platform type) with digital indication of "DPF " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name "DELUX " ( herein referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/ s . Delux Scale Industries , No 1 . Dhatri Tenainents . Thakkarbapa Nagar Road. Near Labhrath Society, Ahmedabad -380050 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/169;
The said Model ( sec the figure given above ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display iudicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to preveut the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declarcs that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg. and up to 5,000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e' value of1 x 10.2 10 or 5 × 10 . where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
(F. No. WM-21 (38 )/20031
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrolouy 679 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 228.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल गथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अर्वे स्केल्स कंपनी, 27 थाडागाम रोड, जीसीटी पोस्ट, कोयम्बटूर 641013 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यू एस " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूतक अस्वचालित, इलेक्ट्रानिक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अर्वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2004/76 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 0.5 से 6 कि.ग्रा. और 1 ग्रा. से 6 कि. ग्रा. से ऊपर 12 कि.ग्रा. तक हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. , 50 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्श. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 %, के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.-21 ( 314 )/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप त्रिস্তান 680
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi, the 21st December , 2004
S.O. 228 .-- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act,the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the inodel of self- indicating non-automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " EWS " series of high accuracy (accu- racy class - 11 ) and with brand name " ARVEY " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Arvev Scales Company, 27 , Thadagarn Road,GC.T Post , Coimbatore -641013 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/76:
The saidModel is a strain gauge type load cell based dual range weighing instrument ( Table top type ) withາ amaxinium capacity of 12 kg and minimum capacity of 25g . The verification scale interval (e) is (0.5g. up to 6 kg. and Ig . above 6 kg and up to 12 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts . and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further in exercise of the powers conterred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of satne series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img or to 50mg and with number of verifi- cation scale unterval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e value of 1x10 , 2-10 or 5 × 10k. k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the sante principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 (314)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 681
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 / माघ 2 , 1926
[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (1) ]
नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 229.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यद् समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों 'का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखोगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ,
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अवें म्केल्स कंपनी , 27 थाडागाम रोड, जीसीटी पोस्ट कोयम्बटूर-641013 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -2 ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यू एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्त्रचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अर्वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/2004/77 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित डूयअल रेंज का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. से 60 कि. ग्रा. और 10 ग्रा. से 60 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर 120 कि.ग्रा. ता है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श दालन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से 300 कि.ग्रा. तक कीअधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम.- 21 ( 314) /2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 682
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II SEC 3( 1) New Delhi , the 21st December, 2004
5.0. 229. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said teporn ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with theprovisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1937 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act the Central Government hereby issues ano publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicaung non- automatic (Platform type) weighing instronent with digital indication of " EWS" series of high accuracy ( acco tacy class-II) and with brand name "ARVEY (herein referredto as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Arvey Scales Company, 27 Thadagam Road, G.C.T. Post , Coimbatore -641013 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/2004/77,
The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based dual range weighing insuament with a maximum capacity of 120kg and minimum capacity of 250g . The verification scale interval (e) is5g upto 60kg . and 10g . above 60kg and up to 120kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED ) display moicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts. 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulem practices
Further, in exercise of the powers conferted by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing Instrument of similar make and performance of same series with inaximum capacity ranging above 50kg to 300kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the ange of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (314 )/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 683 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली 21 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 230.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्वात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थताः बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैहार्स अर्वे स्केल्स कंपनी, 27 थाडागाम रोड, जीसीटी पोस्ट कोयम्बटूर -641013 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ई डब्ल्यू एस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म के लिए कनवर्शन किट ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अर्वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09 / 2004/78 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी आंधकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता हैं । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावतीं धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही सेक, यथार्थता और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 500 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 (314)/2001 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 684
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi, the 21st December, 2004
S.O. 230.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion kat for Platform) with " EWS" series belonging to nedrum accuracy ( accuracy cless- III) and with brand name " VEARY ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s Arvey Scales Con- pany. 27 Chadagan Road G.C.T Post . Coimbatore-641019 , and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/78 ;
The said Model is a weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz, alternate current power supply.
In additionto sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 500kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 110. 2 ^ 10 or 5 × 10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufac- turer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured
[F. No. WM- 21 (314)/2001 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 685
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 231.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22 , 6 वीं क्रास, विल्सनं गार्डन , बंगलौर 560027 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "डीएस-252 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन (टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, ( जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ईएसएस ए ई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/2004/ 245 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत ( स्ट्रेन ) गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. से 7.5 कि. ग्रा. और 2 ग्रा. से अधिक 7.5 कि. प्रा. और 15 कि. ग्रा. तक है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल इ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 प्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 292 ) / 2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109G1/05-4 686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i ) )
New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 231. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weiglits and Measures( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the sard Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automat weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " DS - 252 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy clas III ) and with brand name " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Essae Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22, 6th Cross Wilson Garden , Bangalore - 560 027. Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /2004/245;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top with a maximum capacity of 15 kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 1 g . up to 7.5 kg. and 2g . above 7.5 kg . and up to 15 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machic for fraudulent practices .
Further. in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g and with verification scale unterval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ` e` value of 5 g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10. 2 × 10 or 5 × 114 where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.
F. No WM- 21 (292 )/2003 )
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 687 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 232.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता जनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं . 377/22 , 6वीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन, बंगलौर-560027 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डीएस-415 " स्माइल श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( सिक्का प्रचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के माडल का, ( जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस ए ई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09 /2004/ 246 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज ( स्ट्रेन गेज ) प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (सिक्का प्रचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य काता है ।
SMILE
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 कि. ग्रा. से 20 ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शु समतुल्यहैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 292)/2003]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/ MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 232. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in eonformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Coin operated Person weighing machine) with digital indication of " DS - 415 Smile " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " ESSAE " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) . manufactured by M/ s . Essae Teraoka Limited , No. 377/22 , 6th Cross Wilson Garden . Bangalore - 560 027 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2004/246;
SMILE
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Coin operated Person weighing machine ) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg , and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (c) is 100g. Jt has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacum Fluroscent Display (VFD ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate, seating shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg . to 200kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k . 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero mauufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 (292)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 689 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22 , 2005 / माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 233.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22 , 6 वीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन, बंगलौर-560027 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डीएस -215 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस ए ई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडलं कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2004/247 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृतं गेज ( स्ट्रेन गेज ) प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलनं युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्रं के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (292)/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART 11-SEC 3(ii) ] New Deihu , the 24th December , 2004
S.O. 233. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (sec the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Mcasures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weighis and Measures Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:
Now therefore , in cxercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the suid Act, the Central Government hereby issues and pubrishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platforon type ) with digital indication of "DS - 215 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/ s Essat Teraoka Limited. No 377/22 , 6th Cross , Wilson, Garden , Bangalore- 560 027 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/247;
The saidModel is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and minimum capacity of 400kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 20g . It has atare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supplv.
In addition to scaling the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36, of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of sınmilar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 300 kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e" value of 1 × 10k . 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21( 292 )/2003 )
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 691 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली. 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 234.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए गैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22 , 6वीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन , बंगलौर-560027 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( अथार्थता वर्ग III ) बाले " पोएस -250 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस ए ई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया हैं ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2004/248 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेब ( स्ट्रेन गेज ) प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी झतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 गा है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिा है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन गरिणाम उपदर्शित काला है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हटर्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपष्ण करती है कि मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उत्सी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही ऐक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 के के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से आधिक और 200 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " बाद 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 %, के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.नं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 292 )/2003 ]
पी ए कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 692
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ))
New Delhi, the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 234. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Person weighing machine) with digital indication of " PS - 250 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referredto as the said model ) , manufactured by M/sEssae Teraoka Limited , No. 377/22 , 6th Cross , Wilson Garden Bangalore - 560 027. Karnataka and which is as- signed the approval mark IND /09/2004/248 ;
Estae
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Person weighing machine ) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 200 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ` e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 292 ) /20031
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 69% [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 235.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सैषा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22, 6 वीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन , बंगलौर-560027 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डी एस-65" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, ( जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस एई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिक्ल आई एन डी/09/2004/ 249 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करतीं हैं ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज ( स्ट्रेन गेज ) प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 मि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । निर्वात फलोरसैट ( पी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
22065
स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 कि. ग्रा. तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10% , के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 292 )/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 GI/05-5 694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi, the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 235. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority. is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " DS - 65 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/sEssac Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22 , 6th Cross Wilson Garden , Banglore - 560 027. Karnataka and which is as- signed the approval mark IND /09/2004/249 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 6kg . and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare devicewith a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Florescent Display ( VFD ) indicates the weigh- ing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulem practices .
Further , in exercise of the power conferredby Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' c ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 ^, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM -21 (292 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 695 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ० 236.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22 , 6 वीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन, बंगलौर-560027 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डी एस -650 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस ए ई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/250 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज ( स्ट्रेन गेज) प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । निर्वात फलोरसैट ( पी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
DS-650
स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे और 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10*, 2×10* या 5×10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 292 ) /2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 236. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " DS - 650 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ESSAE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Eşsae Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22, 6th Cross , Wilson Garden , Bangalore - 560027 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/250 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 15kg . and minimum capacity of 40g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Florescent Display ( VFD ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
05-650
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 292 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 697 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ० 237.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22 , 6 वीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन, बंगलौर-560027 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "डी एस-415 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस एई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 251 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज ( स्ट्रेन गेज ) प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( क्रेन प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । निर्वात फलोरसैट ( पी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
Ω
3 TONS
20000
स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सोलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 टन से 20 टन की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक " ई" मान 1×10 , 2× 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 292) /2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 698
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
New Delhi , the 24th December , 2004
S.O. 237. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane Type) with digital indication of " DS - 415 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s Essae Teraoka Limited. No 377/22 , 6th Cross , Wilson Garden, Bangalore -560027 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004 /251 :
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane type) with a maximum capacity of 6000 kg . and minimum capacity of 40kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Florescent Display ( VFD ) indicates the weighing result The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Ω
3 TONS
Esxar
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 20 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' valuc of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2× 10k or 510 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 292 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 699
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माब 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ ० 238.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इसाए टेराका लिमिटेड, सं. 377/22 , 6ीं क्रास, विल्सन गार्डन , बंगलौर-560027 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-- !! I ) वाले " डी एस -451 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ई एस एस ए ई" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/ 252 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (क्रेन प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम
ग़पमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है
निर्वात फलोरसैंट ( पी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है ।
तर्य करता है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज ( स्ट्रेन गेज ) प्र लोड क्षमता 15000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्या जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभा उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदार
जाएगा । स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन व .पटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 टन से 30 टन की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माप मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक " ई" मान 1×10 , 2× 10 या 5× 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (292 )/2003]
पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 700
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( i ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 238. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules. 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Hopper Type) with digital indication of " DS - 451 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - 111 ) and with brand name " ESSAE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Essae Teraoka Limited. No. 377/22 , 6th Cross, Wilson Garden , Bangalore - 560027 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/252:
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Hopper type) with amašinium capacity of 15000 kg. and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retamed tare effect . The Vacuum Florescent Display ( VFD ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate. sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . accuracy and perforınance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 30 tonne with verification scafe interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with e value of 1 × 10%. 2 × 10 or where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 292 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 701 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ ० 239.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वे टेक, 1496/13 , फुल्पुर, मधुपुरा, अहमदाबाद-380001 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्छ यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " डब्ल्यूआई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरणं ( टेबले टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वे टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 183 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टॉपिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक "ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2× 10 के या 5× 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 39 )/2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109 GI/05-6 702
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 239. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of " WI " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " Way Tech " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Way Tech. 1496/13 , Phulpura .
Madhupura , Ahmedabad - 380001 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09/2004/183:
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exereise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 39 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 703 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ० 240.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वे टेक, 1496/13, फुल्पुर, मधुपुरा, अहमदाबाद -380001 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूआई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वे टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 184 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदेर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टॉपिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकिंत करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाईन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10 %, 2× 10 , या 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 39 )/2003 ]
पी० ए. कृष्धामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक याज्जि 704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (i))
New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004
S.O. 240. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with digital indication of " WI " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Way Tech " ( herein referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/s Way Tech . 1496/13 , Phulpura. Madhupura , Ahmedabad - 380001 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09/ 2004/184 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50Hz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- scction ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with e value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10¹, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which. the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 39)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 705 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 241.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरेडी स्केल इण्डिया, एफ -48 , वैशाली नगर, जयपुर -302021 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए एस आई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एवरेडी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004 / 198 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टॉपिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराले सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 के, या 5 × 10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 121 ) /2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 706
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2. 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 24th December , 2004
5.0. 241. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) . is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top Type ) with digital indieation of " ASI " serics of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Aveready " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Aveready Scale India . F -48 . Vaishali Nagar . Jaipur - 302021 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/ 09/ 2004 / 198 :
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The mstrument operates on 230 Volts . 50Hz alternative current power supply.
In addition to seal ing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further. in exercise of the power conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . with verification scale interval ( 11) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 . 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 121 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 707
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघः 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2004)
का ०आ ० 242.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान्न हो गया हैं कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरेडी स्केल इण्डिया , एफ-48 , वैशाली नगर, जयपुर-302021 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए एस आई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके नाण्ड का नाम " एवरेडी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 / 199 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । साचा 'मान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा। स्टॉपिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोपण्णा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में , सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10 , 2 × 10 , या 5 × 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्भक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 121 ) /2003 ]
पो० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 24th December, 2004 .
S.O. 242. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (sec the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers confersed by Sub- sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with digital indication of " ASI " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " Aveready " ( herein refcrred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Aveready Scale India . F -48 . Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur- 302021 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09 /2004/ 199;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with amaximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (c) is 100g . It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive rctamed tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts. 50Hz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping platc , scaling shall also be donc to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further , in excrcise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar makc . accuracy and performance of samc series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 100 %, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM -21 ( 121 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
73
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
ईदिल्ली. 31 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 243.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अरेना वेइंग एण्ड इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीज, 80/2, स्वामी विवेकानन्द रोड, हावड़ा-711101 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू-801 " श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सैतु विषम भुज तुला प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " अरेना " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 163 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विषम भुज तुला प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु- विपम भुज तुला प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50,000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापधान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 कि. ग्रा. है । जाएगा । स्टॉम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 5 टन से अधिकतम और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2× 10 % , या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 57 )/2003 ]
पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 109GI/05-7 710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 31st December , 2004
S.O. 243. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now. therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge- Steelyard type ) with analogue indication of " AW 801 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ARENA " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Arena Weighing and Engineering Industries , 80/2 , Swami Vivekanand Road, Howrah - 711101 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND /09 /2004/163;
The said model is a steelyard type lever based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Weigh bridge- Steelyard type) with a maximum capacity of 50.000 kg. and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10h, wherck is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 57 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपंत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2004 711 का०आ० 244.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अरेना बेइंग एण्ड इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीज , 80/2, स्वामी विवेकानन्द रोख, हावड़ा -711101 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू-802 " श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु - डायल प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " अरेना " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /2004 / 164 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
WEKIHBRIDGE ROOM
00
उक्त मॉडल विषम भुज तुला प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( तोल सेतु डायल प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50,000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 20 कि. ग्रा. है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।
औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मापमान ( एन) अंतराल सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10 , 2× 10 , या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 57 )/2003 ) पी० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप सि 712
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 31st December. 2004
S.O. 244. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge - Dial type ) with analogue indication of " AW 802 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ARENA " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Arena Weighing andEngineering Industries , 80/2 , Swami Vivekanand Road , Howrah - 711101 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09/2004/ 164;
WEIGHBRIDGE ROGE
00
The said model is a steelyard type lever based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge-Dial type ) with a maximum capacity of 50,000 kg . and minimum capacity of 400 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 20 kg.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 kg. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2×10k or 5 × 10 %, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 57 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 713 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ० 245.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्धता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अरेना वेइंग एण्ड इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीज , 80/2 , स्वामी विवेकानन्द रोड, हावड़ा-711101 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू-201 " श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन विपम भुज तुला प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " अरेना " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2004 /165 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल विषम भुज तुला प्रकार लोड का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफोर्म मशीन विषम भुज तुला प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । स्टॉम्पिग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिकके " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10%, या 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 57 )/2003 ]
पी० ए० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi . the 31st December, 2004
S.O. 245. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) , is in confornuty with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rutes . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine - Steelyard type ) with analogue indication of " AW 201 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy classs - III ) and with brand name " ARENA" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Arena Weighirıg and Engineering Industries . 80/2 . Swami Vivekanand Road, Howrah - 711101 and which is assigned the approval Mark I.ND/09 /2004/165 ;
The said model is a steelyard type Icver based non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform machine- Ste ely ard type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg. and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is100 g.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fra udulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and upto 1000 kg ; with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 (57)/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 715 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ० 246.-केन्द्रीय सरकारें का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तांबा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अरेना वेइंग एण्ड इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीज, 80/2 , स्वामी विवेकानन्द रोड, हावड़ा-711101 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( थार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू-301 " श्रृंखला के सदृश सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन डायल प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " अरेना " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 166 'समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विषम भुज तुला प्रकार का लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म मशीन डायल प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 500 ग्रा. है ।
जाएगा । स्टॉपिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 * के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 57 )/2003 ]
पी० ए ० कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 16
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II -SEC, 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 31st December, 2004
S.O. 246. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( sce the figure given beloyv ) , is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform Machine - Dial type ) with analogue indication of " AW 301 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ARENA " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Arena Weighing and Engineering Industries , 80/2 , Swami Vivekanand Road , Howrah - 711101 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09 /2004/ 166 ;
The said model is a steelyard type level based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform Machine -Dial type) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg . and minimum capacity of 10kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 500g.
In addition to sealing the stamping platc , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or inore and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 . 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 57 )/ 2003 }
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
71
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 247.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 528 दिनांक 26 फरवरी, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सप्लाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम-कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट कीभूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 23-04-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
और उक्त आचा की धारा की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनारिपार्ट हे दी है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान ही गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विभिर्दिष्ट भूषि में उपयोग के अधिकारें की अर्जन किया जामी चाहिए । अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए चोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केंन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिल्ला: आणंद
राज्य: गुजरात तालुका: पेटलाद
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टर एयर
उप- खण्ड संख्या
गांवका नाम
सर्वे संख्या
6
3
4
1
2
48
0
01 857
बामरोली
18
0
02 414
संजाया
01
0
09 420
92
0
01 497
[फा. सं. आर-25011/3 /2002- ओआर-1]
रेणुका कुमार , अवर सचिव 109G1/05-8
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS NewDelhi , the 12th January, 2005
S.O. 247. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 528 dated 26th February, 2004, issuedunder sub-section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , (herein after referred to as saidAct) the Central Government declared its intentionto acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam -Koyli Section ofSalaya -Mathura Pipeline System;
And whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 23-04-2004;
And whereas, the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act has submitted nis repoft to the Central Government ;
And whereas, the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Governmenthereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
And further, in the exercise of the powers conferred bysub- section (4) of Section 6 of the sald Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right ofuser in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indiitis Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
District: Anand State: Gujarat Tatika: Petiad
Area
Hectare Are Sq. Mir .
Sub-Divi- sionNo.
No. Survey
Name of theVillage
6
4
5
3
2
1
01
0
48 857
Bamroli
18
0
02
414
Sanjaya
0
09
01 420
92
01
0
497
Ravli
[F. No. R-25011 /3/2002-OR-IJ
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
718
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ.248.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 603 दिनांक 8 मार्च, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम -कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी ।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 25-06-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए । अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिल्ला: खेडा
तालुका: नडियाद
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर नाम
सर्वे संख्या
उप- खण्ड संख्या
1
3
5
2
4
6
0
केरीयावी 748
03
70
0
749
02
48 दंताली
280
0
45
07
[फा. सं. आर.- 25011/4/2002- ओआर-1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] New Delhi , the 12th January, 2005
S.O. 248. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 603 dated 8th March, 2004, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State ofGujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation ofViramgam-Koyli Section ofSalaya -Mathura Pipeline System ;
And whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 25-06-2004;
And whereas, the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted hisreport to the Central Government ;
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification shouldbe acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferredby sub - section section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government by declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
And further, in the exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
Taluka : Nadiad District: Kheda State:Gujarat
Area
Sub-Divi-
Sq . Mtr .
Survey
Hectare Are
sion No.
Name of theVillage No.
1
4
6 2
3
5
70 Kariavi
0
03
748 749
0
48
02
280
0
Dantali
07
45
[F. No. R.-25011/4/2002-OR-I] .
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
719 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/ माघ 2, 1926
NewDelhi , the 12th January, 2005 नई दिल्ली , 12 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 249.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 605 दिनांक 8 मार्च, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम-कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी ।
S.O. 249. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 605 dated 8th March, 2004, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgamto Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam-Koyli Section of Salaya - Mathura Pipeline System;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ, जनता को दिनांक 25-06-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
And whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 25-06-2004;
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted hisreport to the Central Government;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the'said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमिमें उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेडमें निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
And further, in the exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
जिला: आणंद
तालुका: आणंद
राज्य: गुजरात
Taluka : Anand
District : Anand State: Gujarat क्षेत्रफल
Area
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर
गांवकी नाम
सर्वे संख्या
उप-खण्ड संख्या
Hectare Are Sq. Mtr .
sionNo. Sub-Divi-
Name of
theVillage
Survey No.
1
3
4
5
2
6
2
3
4
6
1
5 0
संदेसर
1473
06
67
67
06
0
Sandesar
0
1476
01
21
21
1473 1476
0
01 गाना
212
1
0
03
57
0
57
Gana
212
1
03 0
0
01
17
01
17 212 (2+3)
212 (2+3)
0
23
220
02
2
220
2
0
23
02
90
0
11 0
222
मेधवागाना
11
90
Meghva 222
Gana
[फा. सं. आर. 25011/7/2002- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
[F. No. R. 25011/ 1/2002-OR-I
RENUKA KUMAR, रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव 720
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 250.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 606 दिनांक 8 मार्च, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया - मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम - कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी ।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 25-06-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है । औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए । अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमिमें उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: आणंद
तालुका: बोरसद
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 12th January, 2005
S.O. 250.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 606 dated 8th March, 2004, issued under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , ( hereinafter referred to as said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam-Koyli Section of Salaya- Mathura Pipeline System;
And whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 25-06-2004;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under Sub - section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government ;
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Taluka : Borsad
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर गांव का नाम
उप-खण्ड संख्या
सर्वे संख्या
2
3
4
5
6 1
District: Anand State:Gujarat
Area
Hectare Are Sq. Mtr .
Sub-Divi- sion No.
Survey No.
Name of
theVillage
0
154
01
48 दहेमी
80
0
नामन
02
186
0
01
58
1
नापा तलपद 118
0
174
32
3
01
0
01
36 175
0
158
1
06
79
0
62 158
5
02
[फा. सं . आर . 25011/7/2002- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
6
4
1
2
3
5
48
0
154
01
Dehmi
186
0
02
80 Naman
1
0
01
58 118
Napa
32
0
174
3
01
Talpad
36
0
175
01
1
0
06
79 158
0
5
02
62 158
[F. No. R. 25011/7/ 2002-OR - I ]
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
721
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
NewDelhi , the 12th January, 2005 नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी, 2005
का. आ. 251.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 1434 दिनांक 14 जून, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम -कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।
S.O. 251. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and NaturalGas number S.O. 1434 dated 14th June , 2004, issued under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , (hereinafter referred to as said Act ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline shouldbe laidby the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam-Koyli Section of Salaya- Mathura Pipeline System;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 21-08-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 21-08-2004;
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिर्पोट दे दी है ।
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act has submitted hisreport to the Central Government;
औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहितहोगा ।
अनुसूची
Andfurther, in the exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vestfrom the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
जिल्ला: खेडा
तालुका: नडीयाद
राज्य : गुजरात
Taluka : Nadiad District: Kheda State: Gujarat
क्षेत्रफल
Area हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर
गांव का नाम
सर्वे संख्या
उप -खण्ड संख्या
Sq. Mtr .
Hectare Are
Sub-Divi- sion No.
Name of theVillage
Survey No.
1
4
5
2
6
3
3
6
2
1
5
4
0
07
दंताली
9
38
9
07
38
0
Dantali
0
66
02
59
पीपलाता
0
59
66
02
Piplata
1637
0
52
04
1637
0
04
52 0
01
01
1363
केरीयावी
0
01
01
1363
Keriavi
[फा. सं. आर. 25011/4/2002- ओ.आर.- I ]
[F. No. R. 25011/4/2002-OR -I ] रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy 722
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
नईदिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 252.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 1435 दिनांक 14 जून, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमिं में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम-कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमागाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्तअधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 21-08-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिर्पोट दे दी है। और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अंधकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए । अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमिमें उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: आणंद
आणंद
राज्य: गुजरात तालुका:
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] New Delhi , the 12th January, 2005
S.O. 252. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and NaturalGas number S.O. 1435 dated 14th June , 2004, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , (herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State ofGujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam-Koyli Section of Salaya - Mathura Pipeline System;
And whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 21-08-2004;
Andwhereas, the Competent Authority has under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act has submittedhis report to the Central Government ;
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferredby Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
And further, in the exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 4) of Section 6 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Taluka : Anand
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टर एयर गांवका नाम
सर्वे संख्या
उप-खण्ड संख्या
District: Anand State: Gujarat
Area
Hectare Are Sq . Mtr .
sionNo. Sub-Divi-
Survey No.
Name of
theVillage
4
1
2
5
6
3
10
196
0
92 मेघवागाना
0
194
03
67
5 8/2
2
3
4
5
6 1
5
0
92
10
Meghya 196
193
0
06
47
0
07
17 संदेसर
1418
0
1419
05
38 [फा. सं. आर. 25011/7/2002- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
0
Gana
194
67
03
8/2
193
0
06 47
0
07
Sandesar 1418 1419
0
05
17 38
[F. No. R. 25011/7/2002-OR-I]
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
723
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नईदिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ.253.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 1436 दिनांक 14 जून , 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अंर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम- कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विमरगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी ।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 21-08-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिर्पोट दे दी है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए । अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमिमें उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: आणंद
राज्य: गुजरात तालुका : बोरसद
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर गांवका नाम
सर्वे संख्या
उप-खण्ड संख्या
1
4
5
2
3
6 220
0
12
53 नामन
0
00
84 186
दहेमी
0
01
36 187
01
0
177
11
0
11 189
01
[फा. सं. आर. 25011/7/2002-ओ.आर. - 1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi,, the 12th January, 2005
S.O. 253. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and NaturalGas number S.C) . 1436 dated 14th June , 2004, issued under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam toKoyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline shorald be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Augmentation of Viranıgam-Koyli Section of Salaya- Mathura Pipeline Systema;
And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 20-08-2004;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under Sub-section ( 1) of Section 6 ofthe said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be ac quired;
Now, therefore, in e'xercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired ;
And further, in the exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the central Government hereby directs that the right ofuser in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date ofpublication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Lirnited free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Taluka: Borsad District: Anand State:Gujarat
Area
Sq. Mtr.
Hectare Are
Sub-Divi- sion No.
Name of theVillage
Survey No.
1
2..
3
4
5
6 Naman 220
0
12
53 Dehmi
00
0
84. 186 187
0
01
36 177
0
01
11
:
189
0
01
11
[F. No. R. 25011/7/2002-OR-II
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
724
[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी , 2005
Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ), (hereinafter referred to as said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam - Koyli Section of Salaya- Mathura Pipeline System;
And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 20-08-2004;
का. आ. 254.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालयके का.आ. 1437 दिनांक 14 जून, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम- कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरमगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी ।
And whereas, the Competent Authority has under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act has submitted hisreport to the Central Government;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 20-08-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिर्पोट दे दी है ।
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्तं अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
Taluka: Borsad
District: Anand State: Gujarat अनुसूची
Area
जिला: आणंद
तालुका: बोरसद
राज्य: गुजरात
Survey Sub -Divi- Hectare Are Sq. Mtr .
क्षेत्रफल
sion No.
Name of theVillage No.
5
6
2
3
4
1
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर
गांव कां नाम
सर्वे संख्या
उप- खण्ड संख्या
0
07
46
Kasumbad 84
1
2
4
6
3
5
[F. No. R. 25011/7/2002 -OR-I] 0
84
07
46
कसुम्बड
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
[फा. सं. आर. 25011/7/2002- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
नई दिल्ली, 12 जनवरी, 2005
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 12th January , 2005
का. आ. 255.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 1438 दिनांक14 जून, 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलान ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर सलाया - मथुरा पाइपलाइन प्रणाली के विरमगाम -कोयली सेक्शन की संवर्द्धन परियोजना हेतु अपरिष्कृत तेल S.O. 254. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1437 dated 14th June, 2004, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) 72 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए, विरगाम से कोयली तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 21-08-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिर्पोट दे दी है ।
under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petrolcum and Minerals pipelines ( Acquisition of Pight of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as said Act ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Viramgam to Koyli in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laidby the Indian Oii Corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Viramgam -Koyli Section of Salaya- Mathara Pipeline System;
औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गधा है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए!
And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 21-08-2004;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has urider sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है किइस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जन किया जाता है ।
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the light of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
यह और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजान सभी दिल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification area hereby acquired;
अनुसूची
जिल्ला: आणंद
आणंद
राज्य: गुजरात
तालुका:
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर
And further, in the exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the IndianOil Corporation Limited free from ali encumbrances.
उप-खण्ड संख्या
गांवका नाम
सर्वे संख्या
SCHEDULE
5
2
6
1
3
4
Taluka : Anand District: Anand State: Gujarat 0
2
10
93
206
मेथवा गाना
Arca
0
01
206
6
43
0
1
03
57
188
Hectare Are Sq. Mtr.
sion No. Sub-Divi-
4
0
05
00
189
Name of theVillage
Survey No.
05
84
184
4
6
2
3
5
1
0
55
संदेसर
1651
02
2
0
93
10
Meghya 206
0
1420
04
19
0
43
206
5
Gana
01
03
57
0
188
1
0
1421
01
00
05
00
4
0
189
0
05
84
184
0
02
53 [फा. सं. आर. 25011 /7/2002 - ओ.आर. - 1 ] रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
Sanúesar 1651
0
04
19
1420
New Delhi , the 12th January, 2005
0
00
01
1421
[F. No. R. 25011 /7/2002 -OR-I ] S.O. 255 .-- Whereas by the rotification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1438dated 14th June, 2004, issueá
RENUKA KUMAR, Under Secy.
109 G1/05-0 726 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2,1926
नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 256 -केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के भ्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़ , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा - दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाईपलाइन परियोजना हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड , 16 कृष्णा विहार, नारायण निवास के पास, गोपालपुरा बाईपास रोड, जयपुर -302018 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
727
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
अनुसूची
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
1. खोराबीसल
521
519
520
516
517
515/721
515
514
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
10
17
0
20 0
00
67 0
13
0
27
27
00
33 0
57
12
0
0
02
38
00
20 0
0
41
12
514/720
506
513
507
511
510
554
555
555/719
485
38 0
00
17
01
0
13
13 0
19 0
02
27 0
08
60 0
00
0
08
09
47
01
0
78 0
00
00
0
81
484(जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)
00
52 0
556(जे.डी.ए.रास्ता)
483
482
480
561/747
561
562
478
476
88 0
20
0
16
80
48 0
00
20 0
00
29 0
19
02
99 0
0
00
20
03
42 0
02
52 0
475(जे.डी.ए.रास्ता)
454
438
442
441/918
441
16 0
11
88 0
29
04
05
0
02
16 0
77
20 [PART II--SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 728
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 / MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर एयर
गाँव का नाम
5
6
4
2
3
44
0
01
399/906
खोराबीसल (जारी...)
1.
04
0
59
399
17
55
395
04
23
0
397
0
58
05
396
44
0
01
364(जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)
29
16
0
354
20
00
0
355
05
0
13
351
20
0
00
352
54
0
27
349
01
71
0
347 (जे.डी.ए.रास्ता)
90
09
0
346
0
01
89
246/894(जे.डी.ए.)
20
00
0
344/893 (जे.डी.ए. )
56
0
25
97
07
56
0
98
20
00
0
100
0
26
28
101
44
01
103(जे.डी.ए.रारता)
00
0
20
101/709
60
12
ວ
229/712
28
03
0
229
0
08
31
230
00
0
90
230/694
0
18
09
237
0
20
(10
235
00
49
0
238/866
07
44
0
238
42
0
12
239
33
11
0
242
00
66
0
243
0-0
0
20
241
23
03
0
252
04
30
0
246
59
08
0
247 729
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
1
3
2
208 1. खोराबीसल (जारी ...)
207
206
205 क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
6
5
67 0
04
0
09
70
32 0
22
0
07
02 0
01
08
199/849
199 0
05
92 0
06
20
2.59(जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)
273
272
271
269
268
267
180 2. शुभरामपुरा
212 3. बेबाड़मयदौलतपुरा
211
210
209
208
205 0
58
00
0
05
18
10
0
17
04 0
14
02 0
10
0
37
01
20 0
03
0
48
15
0
40
14
02
16
0
0
64
06
46
17
0
0
04
14 0
02
07
232(स. रास्ता)
234
237
238
167
166
169
165
171
163
174
109
25
32
104 0
12
06 0
06
66 0
00
20 0
12
06 0
62
10
0
76
14
0
07
56
66 0
06
16
5-1
0
70
11
73
0
08
35 0
01
0
01
02
14
0
64 730
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005 / MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम
एयर
4
5
6 1
3
2
G
10
08
103
3. बेबाड़मयदौलतपुरा (जारी...)
01
0
15
१०(स.रास्ता)
0
00
57
68
15
63
69
0
0
00
20
70
07
92
67
0
66
0
06
55
0
04
86
57
09
0
02
58
15
0
10
59
00
0
45
4. नांगलसिरस
249(जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
76
0
05
250 (रेल्वे)
0
04
68
251 (रेल्वे)
34
0
16
804(जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)
16
0
02
805 (जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
0
28
89
806 (जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
0
20
00
806/876 (जे.डी.ए. )
02
01
0
819
42
80
0
815
00
48
0
813
00
0
61
167
5. नींदड़
15
0
14
166
17
0
01
165
0
09
45
163
0
03
78
162
06
12
0
187
0
10
89
188
0
11
88
192
63
0
10
191
00
20
0
190/3433
06
02
0
203
79
02
0
204/3434
03
42
0
204
73
07
205
20
00
0
208 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
'731
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005 /माप 2,1926
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
1
2
3
207 5. बींदड़ (जारी... )
206
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4
5
6 0
03
80 0
14
40
05
0
76
152(जे.डी.ए.नाला)
145
146
140
144
141
142
135
136
127
125
116
116/3527 0
03
04 0
00
20 0
01
39 0
00
26 0
03
24 0
00
26 0
13
75 0
13
59 0
00
20 0
08
55 0
02
74 0
05
27
0.1
08
275 (जे.डी.ए.नाला)
292
291
288
287
283
338
340
341
342
351
350
354
355
356
357
358
359
412
411 0
17
01 0
07
02 0
08
37 0
07
46 0
07
92 0
09
00 0
02
37
11
07 0
0
15
03 0
00
20 0
19
35 0
01
60 0
03
02 0
04
86 0
05
20 0
05
51 0
0.0
20 0
07
90 0
08
46 0
02
99
567 (जे.डी.ए.रास्ता)
732
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर
खसरा सं .
एयर
4
5
1
6 2
3
07
0
64
408
5. नींदड़ (जारी...)
09
12
0
409
0
00
20
407
G2
46
C
576
0
21
21
574
08
42
573
0
00
20
0
569
0
08
06
571
16
0
11
570
20
00
596
0
72
0
10
428
6. राजावास
02
0
02
427/887
22
0
16
429
09
04
0
431
70
02
0
432
00
24
0
441
10
0
11
440
87
03
0
439
44
10
0
478
91
02
0
476 (स.चारागाह)
61
14
0
477(स. चारागाह)
06
52
0
474(स.चारागाह)
01
0
30
484(स.चारागाह)
08
01
0
473
02
07
0
485
00
0
54
486/903 (स . चारागाह)
16
02
487 (स.चारागाह)
02
07
0
655 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
10
44
0
771
80
01
0
771/877
36
09
0
770/832
01
39
0
770
96
21
C
768
00
84
0
765/830
20
00
0
774
06
18
0
775 733
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/ माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
खसरा सं.
कम सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
776 राजावास (जारी...)
6.
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
6 4
5
72
18
0
0
26
01
757(पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
756
732
733
752
753
751
749
74
16
0
06
93 0
04
30 0
06 0
12
04
32 0
17
12
0
23
04
0
01
08 0
749/868
748
58 7. नांगलपुरोहित
46
45
44
43
42
38
39
41
40
36
25
26
22
21
18
17
01
26 0
00
96 0
27
14
0
40
05
0
06
12 0
12 0
06
0
03
04
20
00
0
40
05
0
20
00
0
66 0
13
02
54 0
12
50 0
01
0
98
52
02
0
96
21
0
48
09
0
96
00
0
60
09
0
16 (जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
15
56
01
0
10
05
0
12(जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)
20
02
0
70/1242 (जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)
02
06
0
114 (जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)
16
03
0
115(जे.डी.ए.नाला)
00
09
0
116 (जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
55
05
0
198/1298
109GI/05-10 734
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
एयर वर्ग मीटर गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर
4
6 2
3
5
1
17
0
64
113/1297
नांगलपुरोहित (जारी...)
7.
32
0
10
111 (जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)
10
0
110
98
17
20
0
201
107
68
13
0
76
23
105
0
75
0
22
72(जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
96
0
12
8. छवरकावास
279 (जे.डी.ए.चारागाह)
0
16
11
278 (जे.डी.ए. नाला)
07
02
0
277 (जे.डी.ए. चारागाह)
0
00
25
263 (जे.डी.ए. रास्ता)
0
64
276
12
0
08
46
271
0
273
00
20
0
264
00
33
0
272
01
32
0
20
00
273
05
0
90
270
0
58
14
269
0
04
268
05
0
9. चेतावाला
02
287
15
0
10
72
286
0
16
09
241
0
00
20
282
43
283
0
00
71
0
09
242
00
85
243
0
0
11
34
238
0
01
68
240
0
02
94
133
0
135
00
88
136
0
09
36
0
10
45
137
0
14
07
139
0
11
92
142
04
0
01
141 735
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
तहसील : आमेर
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
143 9. चेतावाला (जारी...)
144
145
107 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
5
6 4
0
56
07
0
20
00
15
28 0
80 0
02
20 0
00
106(स. रास्ता)
105
88
87
82
85
83
20
03
0
38
13
0
56 0
08
04
07
0
20
00
0
16
70 0
47
01
0
158(स. रास्ता)
159
162
161
70 0
00
40
22
0
0
50
00
44 0
01
176(स. रास्ता)
201
200
199
182
185
184
183
188
196 10. बदनपुरा
197
72
09
0
04
14
0
0
09
36
20
00
0
80
10
0
80 0
10
64
08
0
36
03
0
00
27
0
34
20
0
44
01
0
199(स.रास्ता)
213
202
205
254
253
247
252
248
250
62
37
0
88
11
0
58
32
0
94 0
03
64
00
0
40
04
0
20 0
00
72 0
09
40
03
G 736
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : आमेर
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
249 10. बदनपुरा (जारी...)
243
272/403
275
313
312
315
311
318
310
304
305
303
301 11. खोराश्यामदास
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6 0
14
40 0
01
81 0
00
20 0
20
00
06
0
65 0
10
44 0
04
50 0
06
84 0
83
13
0
18
36 0
09
54 0
16
92 0
00
20 0
09
36 0
15
12
199(ग्रा.पं. चारागाह)
0
01
26
209/1841 (ग्रा.पं.चारागाह)
209
207
210
206
121
96
98
99
63
62
53
54
51
52
45
43
44
38
37 0
11
52
00
0
68 0
00
20 0
18
99 0
04
01
00
0
30 0
77
22
0
22
14 0
06
12 0
03
42 0
13
23
00
0
20 0
04
26 0
49
01
0
08
01 0
07
29 0
16
11
32 0
04
0
15
21 0
01
98
262(स.रास्ता)
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
आमेर
तहसील :
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
292 11. खोराश्यामदास (जारी...)
293
295
296
297
298
299
300
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
969
970
970/1810
978
974
975
977
976
990
991
228 12. देगडास
229
737 राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
5
6 4
0
03
06
44
10
0
06
30 0
06
74 0
20 0
00
10
0
88
02
03 0
30
01
0
12
96 0
20
01
0
42 0
11
0
87
12
}
02
10 0
0
20
00
29 0
00
89 0
10
0
02
52
04 0
05
76
05
0
75 0
15
0
00
20 0
18
09
05
04 0
49
00
0
92 0
07
28
08
0
0
12
01
230(स. रास्ता)
219
218
217
216
215
214
436 13. चौप
438/2475
20
07
0
00
06
0
16 0
19
12
06
0
36 0
09
20
00
0
06
21
0
20
00
0 738
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
तहसील : आमेर
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
1
2
3 चॉप (जारी...)
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6
03
44 0
438(स.चारागाह)
13.
76 0
05
437(स.चारागाह)
74
16
0
439(स.चारागाह)
32
04
0
475(स.चारागाह)
441
464
465
462
76
32
0
60
03
0
78
12
0
31
12
0
05
00 0
51 (स. रास्ता)
582
583
584
456
456/2401
455
452
370/2313
586
00
01
0
20 0
02
40
06
0
96
00
0
52 0
02
49
06
0
89 0
01
0
04
32
10 0
02
02
16 0
670(स. नाला)
587
588
589/2332
589
590
591
592
669
668
666
667
676
677
681
680
679
02
08 0
88 0
02
35
01
0
42
03
0
03
78 0
60 0
03
0
03
24
84 0
06
05
04
0
83
00
0
12 0
04
46
08
0
0
19
08
20
00
0
20
00
0
06
84 0
08 0
01
715(स.रास्ता)
739
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
2
3 1
245 13. चौप (जारी...)
244/2275
244
168
172
1.75/2478
188
187
186
191
94
92
93
90
89
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर यर वर्ग मीटर
5
6 4
0
13
68 0
00
90 0
16
20 0
13
14
87 0
12
00
0
99 0
84
15
00
20 0
0
11
52 0
12
15 0
72
18
0
09
54 0
76
07
0
07
92 0
13
68 0
01
26
821(स .रास्ता)
819
8.20
824
833
825
828
830
852
854/2182/2402
854
854/2182
855/2183
855
855/2183/2403
857
859
859/2377
899
898 0
78
12
0
13
68
33
0
08 0
07
30 0
02
00 0
00
20 0
02
73 0
27
17
86 0
13
0
00
63 0
00
20 0
00
48 0
05
94
15
08 0
0
13
68 0
05
94 0
04
68 0
03
40 0
29
61 740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
तहसील : आमेर
जिला: जयपुर क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
894 13. चाँप (जारी... )
895
892
887
886
885
923
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6 0
04
82
15
0
21 0
02
88 0
06
03
00
20 0
26
0
99
58 0
00
66
06
0
967(स. रास्ता)
959
07
74
30 0
06
958 (स.चारागाह)
952(स.चारागाह)
952/2356 0
89
01
35 0
01
950(स.चारागाह)
951
934
678 14. ईशरावाला
677
679 0
20
00
11
70 0
0
82
08
13
0
50 0
73
08
0
02
70
676(स .रास्ता)
667
666
696
663
643 0
01
60
56 0
22
01
89 0
0
00
30 0
25
80
03
32 0
640(स.भूमि)
639
02
08 0
0
06
12
583(स.नाला)
03
0
58
582(स.भूमि)
581
491
21
0
85
69 0
14
0
00
20
489(स.भूमि)
51 0
01
490(स.भूमि)
501
503
502 0
07
05
51
02
0
36 0
02 741
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
504 ईशरावाला (जारी...)
14.
505
506
507
510
511
512
509
513
514
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
5
6 4
45 0
02
63
02
0
44 0
01
0
09
81
00
0
63 0
00
77
03 0
01
01
62 0
12
22
0
15
55 0
74 0
07
434/830 (स.चारागाह)
465
462
471
664
605 15. बिलोंची
606
610 0
09
06 0
00
96 0
17
64
07
50 0
10
53 0
43
11
0
83
07
0
07
02
0
600 (स. रास्ता)
2
533
536
538
537
546
547
545
548
549
544
13 0
05
20 0
09
09
27 0
0
40
10
20 0
03
96 0
08
04
06 0
70
01
0
26 0
01
15
07
0
28 0
06
90
00
0
510(स. रास्ता)
509
508
503
502 109G1/05-11
0
14
61
20
00
0
0
09
18 0
58
01 742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : आमेर
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
501 15. बिलोंची (जारी...)
499
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
06
57 0
24
12
0
08 0
01
384(स.नाला)
385
390
42
12
0
0
20
34
34 0
00
390/1755(स.भूमि)
0
02
34
235(स.रास्ता)
254 16. श्रीगोविन्दपुरा
255
259
260
260/492
84
06
0
0
06
57 0
07
83 0
11
25
05
0
22
01
0
80
260/494
260/493
75 0
06
65
01
0
260/489
262
423
432
434
435
00
20 0
30
06
0
0
10
26
10
0
62 0
14
22 0
02
52
421(स.रास्ता)
0
76
05
411(स.भूमि)
02
43 0
411/496 (स.भूमि)
68 0
01
420(स.रास्ता)
95
04
0
419(स.भूमि)
78 0
12
415(स.भूमि)
404/498
403
397/500
390/501
391
385/503
386/502
04
32 0
0
70
29
44 0
28
74 0
09
80 0
00
0
00
20
70 0
07
20
00
0
390 (स.भूमि)
84 0
03
386(स.भूमि)
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
743
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
तहसील : आमेर
जिला: जयपुर क्रम सं.
गाँव को नाम
खसरा सं .
3 1
2
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
5
6 4
17
0
76
387 (स.भूमि)
16. श्रीगोविन्दपुरा (जारी...)
22
86 0
378(स.भूमि)
25
38 0
379(स.भूमि)
0
01
62
371/560 (स . रास्ता)
0
02
70
370/559 (स . चारागाह)
370
362
365
363
367
361
360
355/469
355
860 17. घटवाडा
862
863
70 0
11
03
40 0
88 0
02
60 0
03
0
20
00
04 0
08
0
04
77 0
76
05
70 0
66
0
19
26 0
09
36
83
07
0
17 0
01
864(स.नाला)
866
874
953/1191
787/1201
787/1183 0
79
29
0
27
63 0
33
03
0
09
07
00
0
74 0
01
62
787/1183 ओर 787 के बीच में
787
20 0
00
0
44
01
787/1199 (स.भूमि)
786
785
781
95
13
0
0
585
14
0
34
02
02
43 0
772(स. रास्ता)
731
730
729
725 0
14
04 0
07
47 0
05
49
16
11
0 744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 / MAGHA 2. 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
गाँव का नाम
एयर
4
6 1
3
5
2
0
10
724
80 17. घटवाडा (जारी...)
94
704/1164
0
05
83
704
0
16
0
00
20
712
50
0
705
04
0
710
06
93
0
99
711
00
0
34
11
709
02
70
0
674(स.रास्ता)
0
10
08
665
83
0
668
09
00
666
0
67
0
05
667
29
03
15
0
634(स. रास्ता)
24
0
00
533
0
10
534
80
0
07
73
535
87
0
02
537
0
49
13
536(स. रास्ता)
0
00
32
564
26
539
02
0
00
20
540
0
20
00
560/998/1223
0
23
02
539/1137 (स.भूमि)
0
01
44
560/998
0
12
560
24
40
0
14
544
546
0
08
28
07
75
0
3004
18. मानपुरामाचेडी
0
05
21
3008
13
0
32
3006
0
02
3000
16
2999
0
07
92
06
0
37
2998
0
01
2995
98 745
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुरं
खसरा सं .
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
3
2
1
2997 मानपुरामाचेडी (जारी...)
18.
2996
3048
3049
3059
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4
5
0
05
16 0
04
50 0
05
05 0
09
58 0
03
74 0
01
22
3059(स. रास्ता)
3100
3099
3098
3097
3096
3086
3085
3087 0
02
22
09
0
66 0
01
80 0
64
08
0
09
24 0
07
92 0
05
62 0
00
50 0
00
60
3084(स.भूमि)
00
67 0
3083(स.भूमि)
0
02
48
3074(स. रास्ता)
0
01
34
3110 (स.भूमि)
3111
3123
3122
3125
3121
3127
3128
3130
15
32 0
0
08
46
20 0
00
0
02
52
72 0
09
0
06
91 0
05
40
40 0
02
36 0
03
3633(स. नाला)
3616
3617
3619
3620
3622
3584
3585
3580
03
0
18
16
20
0
10
08 0
02
86 0
20
0.0
0
76
01
0
36
00
0
0
07
79 746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
राज्य : राजस्थान
तहसील : आमेर
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
वर्ग मीटर
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर एयर
गाँव का नाम
6
3
4
5
1
2
40
05
0
3579
मानपुरामाचेडी (जारी...)
18.
0
10
80
3577
07
20
0
3578
16
3573
11
0
00
0
72
3555
24
0
08
35.72
0
11
92
3562(स.चारागाह)
20
0
08
3560
02
66
0
3559 (स. चारागाह)
64
0
39
3518(स.चारागाह)
40
0
14
3518/3703 (स.चारागाह)
11
0
52
3520
0
02
52
3523
09
36
0
3524
05
0
04
3466
0
04
80
3465
06
12
0
3464
14
0
40
3463
00
0
20
3467
00
72
0
3473(स. रास्ता)
0
10
80
1242 (स.भूमि)
19. पुठकाबास
56
07
0
1232
उर्फ
16
0
02
चावा का बास
1233(स.नाला)
0
00
09
57
0
02
80
54
86
0
04
55
00
09
0
56
01
44
0
72(स.रास्ता)
04
0
68
73
32
0
00
80
24
0
07
79
92
0
07
78
86
0
01
78/1428
80
0
01
76
20
0
00
78/1430 747
भारत का राजपत्र': जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : आमेर
राजस्थान
राज्य:
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
2
1
3
77 19. पुठकाबास
77/1427 उर्फ
चांवा का बास (जारी...)
227 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
45(स.भूमि)
44
47
42/1414
42(स.भूमि)
13(स.भूमि)
13/1425
13/1552
13/1408
8
1982
2
3
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
22 0
05
60 0
03
66 0
02
80 0
13
0
60
00
0
17
20 0
02
52 0
00
24
0
95
25
0
20
34
66 0
29
0
05
11
76 0
05
24 0
89
26
0
88 0
72
08
0
01
68
4(स.चारागाह)
669 20. बीलपुरा
668
667/924
670
667
666
672
673
674
665
664
661
662
623
622
616
605
603 0
03
78 0
02
52 0
09
18
0
00
2.0
12
0
96 0
05
31 0
18
06
20 0
00
40 0
02
0
00
30 0
09
78 0
08
08 0
01
28
09
0
18 0
06
30
61 0
29
0
02
18 0
10
38 748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : आमेर
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
2
1
3
596 20. बीलपुरा (जारी...)
534
535
595
536
537
538
581
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
6
5
0
16
09
0
02
32 0
32
08
0
00
72
01
0
50 0
05
84
60 0
05
0
72
09
581/978 (स.भूमि)
}
0
06
03
580(स.भूमि)
539
438 0
00
93 0
80
00
0
66
00
438/976(स.भूमि)
579
01
56 0
0
01
20
539/977 (स.नाला)
437
524
579/986
584
578
577
572
574
571 0
01
18
60
00
0
04
41 0
40 0
02
48 0
00
42
23
0
62
01
0
00
0
36
64 0
08
0
02
16
567/912
567
564
562
563
555
556
20 0
16
72 0
09
07
57 0
0
10
56 0
01
47
02
05 0
0
03
18
376(स.नाला)
369
312
313
98 0
19
15
03
0
01
96 0 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
तहसील : आमेर
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2.
311 20. बीलपुरा (जारी...)
310
309
308
307
305
749 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
4
6
5
46
07
0
20
00
0
03
60 0
24
03
0
68
04
0
62
06
0
0
84
01
306(स.भूमि)
96 0
00
318/859 (स. रास्ता)
20
00
0
318/860
161/857
161/858
161
97
17
0
39
00
0
00
20 0
03
20 0
287/949
0
12
01
287(स.नाला)
289
288
30
01
0
06
18 0
14
04
0
272(स. रास्ता)
271
267
266
268
265
31 21. सुन्दरपुरा
30
24
23
22
21
13
12
7
76
05
0
15
0
48 0
04
86
02
0
16
10
80 0
54
09
0
08 0
10
02
07
0
22
05
0
06
39 0
54 0
09
17
28 0
39 0
12
00
24 0
10 0
08
2(स.चारागाह)
35
41
42 109GI/05-12
40 0
00
74 0
07
0
98
10 750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : आमेर
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
1
3
2
44 21. सुन्दरपुरा (जारी...)
39
45
46
49
48
55/748
55
54
क्षेत्रफल
एयर
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
6 4
5
04 0
06
0
20
00
40
05
0
0
78
06
01
0
68 0
58
02
01
89 0
02
0
56 0
09
54 0
20
00
53(स.पहाड़)
351
353
358
357
356
359
365
368
374
370
373
372
377
376
375
380
381
382
385
384
383
386
389
387
388
99
00
0
0
01
90
03
20 0
27 0
12
00
20 0
0
80
11
0
01
44
28 0
11 .
01
32 0
02
04 0
0
09
99
08 0
01
0
03
19 0
21
06
20 0
00
28
07
0
46
02
0
01
86 0
02
79 0
02
79 0
20 0
00
01
98 0
0
96
03
52 0
03
04
40 0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
751
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
आमेर
तहसील :
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
1
2
3
367 सुन्दरपुरा (जारी... )
21.
22. लाम्यामेवाल
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
6
5
0
64
80
13 0
19
128(स.पहाड़)
85 0
18
129(स.पहाड़)
131
123/554
123
121
119
109
111
112
113
101
100
97
96
95
70
71
67
00
20 0
20 0
00
24
00 0
16
26 0
0
00
20 0
06
30 0
05
04 0
04
68 0
04
68 0
42
03
0
02
70 0
03
60 0
04
14 0
03
96 0
12
55 0
00
20
20 0
03
0
00
88
68(स.नदी)
0
00
90
69(स.भूमि)
04
0
86
64(स.नदी)
63
60
58
55
54
53
48
47
46
45
39
40
06
12 0
14
0
76 0
09
54 0
04
50 0
05
04 0
72
09
0
04
72 0
02
84
00
0
84
71 0
04
00
20 0
0
14
94 752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : आमेर
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
37 22. लाम्यामेवाल (जारी...)
36
28
35
31
29
30
20
17
19
18
14
11
10
4
3
2
796 23. देव का हरमाडा
795
794
793
792
791
802
804
790
805
806
807
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
4
6
5
00
0
20
20
10
0
0
94
07
0
84.
00
02
0
38
85 0
03
0
59
05
05
0
94 0
20
00
0
36
03
0
96
00
76 0
05
0
07
09 0
07
74
07
38 0
06
0
48 0
06
12 0
08
10 0
06
03
06
0
84 0
61
02
03
60 0
0
24
03
0
20
00
0
10
80 0
00
20 0
07
92 0
90
04
40 0
00
0
01
44
428(स. रास्ता)
422
423
299
300
298 0
09
90 0
09
94 0
01
68
72 0
15
0
03
00 753
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
तहसील : आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
क्षेत्रफल
एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर
5
6 4
06
76 0
301 (स.चारागाह)
23. देव का हरमाडा (जारी ...)
297
205
05
86 0
17 0
01
16
0
36
419(स.चारागाह)
00
36 0
204/1204 (स . चारागाह)
302
325
204/1397
204/1396
204/1391
200/1390
185/1221
174
171
170
169
340
341
120
118
117
347
348
351
352 0
02
80 0
24
20
0
04
08 0
03
40
}
0
00
20 0
09
54 0
57
11
0
86
04
0
07
11 0
06
30 0
06
84 0
02
79 0
01
12 0
51
01
76
05
0
0
07
56 0
08
28 0
30
08
0
02
07
05
352/1279
0
04 0
03
06
353/1280 (स . खड्डा)
353
82
81
80
84
79
75
78
77 0
02
10 0
05
04
0
02
82 0
02
10 0
16
47 0
02
24
88 0
10
0
01
19 0
94
01 754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील: आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
एयर वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
5
1
3
4
6 2
03
0
82
77/1374
23. देव का हरमाडा (जारी...)
0
01
20
22/1335
0
01
80
17/1334
0
36
21
18
0
08
10
21/1359
0
19
98
18
0
98
01
17/1328
09
0
07
17
0
04
86
17/1372
0
00
56
15
32
0
04
16(स.नाला)
0
10
44 24. लखेर
230 (स.नाला)
40
ง
04
142
30
0
40
141
0
30
28
83
0
00
77
82
0
33
30
78
0
04
50
72
0
04
68
71
23
0
19
67
27
0
03
66
16
0
11
44
32
0
13
45
0
48
37
15
12
60
0
33
42
0
00
24
13
0
55
23
0
00
79
22
0
28
08
26
0
08
29
27
50
0
05
17
0
00
20
19
98
0
01
18
0
07
38
285 (पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. सड़क)
66
96
0
291 755
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील: आमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर 1
2
3
4
5
6
290
00
0
64 24. लखेर (जारी...)
0
291/1295
01
56
294/1296
0
24
294/1296/1
48
294/1296/2
0
29
34
1 (स.नदी)
0
72
00
457 (स.चारागाह)
25. चक मनोहरपुरा
[फा. सं . आर-31015/70/2004-ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 17th January, 2005
S. O. 256. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleur : Corporation Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the rightof user therein ;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right ofuser therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur, Competent Authority, Mundra- Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , 16 Krish na Vihar, Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye- pass Road , Jaipur- 302018 ( Rajasthan) .
756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
3
2
521 1. KHORABISAL
519
520-
516
517
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
17
10. 0
20
00
13
0
67 .
27
0
27 .
0
00
33 0
12
57
515/721
515
514
514/720
506
5.13
507
511
510
554
555
38 0
02
0
00
20
41 0
12
0
00
38
17 0
01
13
0
13
02.
0
19
27 0
08
00
60 0
09 0
08
47 0
01
555/719
485 0
00
78
00
81
484( J.D.A Cart Track)
00
0
52
556 (J.D.A Cart Track)
483
482
480
561/747
561
562
478
476
20
88 0
80 0
16
48
00
0
20 0
00
29 0
19
02
0
99
00
20 0
0
03
42
52 0
02
475(J.D.A. Cart Track)
454
438.
442
16 0
11
29
0 .
88 0
04
05
16 0
02
441/918
441 0
20
70 757
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : AMER
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3
2
1
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
44 0
01
399/906
1. KHORABISAL ( Contd ... )
399
395
397
396 0
04
59 0
55
17
0
04
23
05
0
58 0
01
44
364( J.D.A . Cart Track)
354
355
351
352
349
16
0
29
00
20 0
13
0
05 0
00
20 0
27
54
71
01
0
347(J.D.A Cart Track)
346 0
09
90
01
0
89
346/894( J.D.A )
20 0
00
344/893( J.D.A)
97
98
100
101
56
25
0
56 0
07
20 0
00
26 0
28
44 0
01
103(J.D.A Cart Track)
20 0
00
101/709
0
12
60
229/712
229
230
03
28 0
31
08
0
90 0
00
230/694
237
235 0
09
18 0
00
20
49
00
0
238/866
238
239
242
243
241
252
246
247 109 GI/2005-13
0
07
44
42
12
0
33. 0
11
66 0
00
20
00
0
23
03
0
04
30
0
59
08
0 758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
208 1. KHORABISAL ( Contd ... )
207
206
205
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
5
6
67 0
04
0
09
70 0
22
32 0
07
02 0
199/849
199
01
08 0
05
92 0
06
20
259(J.D.A Cart Track)
273
272
271
269
268
267
180 2. SHUBHRAMPURA
212 3 . BENARMAYDAULATPURA
211
210
209
208
205 0
00
58 0
05
18 0
10
17 0
14
04 0
10
02
01
0
37
03
0
20 0
15
48
40 0
14
02 0
16
0
06
64 0
46
17
0
04
14 0
02
07
232(G/LCart Track)
234
237
238
167
166
169
165
171
163
174
109
25
32
104 0
12
06 0
06
66 0
20
00
0
12
06
62
10
0
76 0
14
0
56
07
0
66
06
16
0
51
70 0
11
73 0
08
01
35 0
02
01
0
0
64
14 759
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : AMER
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
3
2
1
BENARMAYDAULATPURA
103 3.
(Contd... )
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
0
10
08 0
01
15
90(G/L Cart Tarck)
68
69
70
67
55
57
58
59 4. NANGALSIRAS
0
00
57 0
63
15
0
00
20 0
07
92
66 0
06
0
86
04
0
02
09 0
10
15 0
45
00
249( J.D.A.Pasture)
0
76
05
250(Railway )
04
0
68
251(Railway)
16
0
34
804(J.D.A. Pasture)
0
16
02
805 ( J.D.A. Pasture)
28
0
89
806(J.D.A . Pasture)
0
00
20
806/876(J.D.A. )
819
815
813
167 5. NINDAR
166
165
163
162
187
188
192
191
01
0
02 0
42
80 0
00
48 0
00
61 0
15
14
01
17 0
0
45
09
0
78
03
0
06
12
0
10
89
11
88 0
10
63 0
0
20
00
190/3433
203
204/3434
204
205
208
02
06 0
02
0
79 0
03
42
73 0
07
20 0
00 760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
1
3
207 5. NINDAR (Contd ...)
206 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
03
80 0
14
40
05
76 0
152( J.D.A Nala)
145
146
140
144
141
142
135
136
127
125
116 0
03
04
00
0
20
39 0
01
0
00
26 0
08
24 0
26
00
0
13
75 0
13
59
00
0
20
55 0
08
0
02
74
27 0
116/3527
05
0
01
08
275 ( J.D.A Nala)
292
291
288
287
283
338
340
341
342
351
350
354
355
356
357
358
359
412
411 0
17
01
02 0
07
0
08
37 0
46
07
92 0
07
0
00
09
37
02
0
0
07
11
03 0
15
0
00
20 0
35
19
01
60 0
0
03
02 0
04
86 0
05
20
05
0
51 0
00
20 0
07
90
46 0
08
0
02
99
567(J.D.A.Cart Track)
761
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
408 5. NINDAR ( Contd ...)
409
407
576
574
573
569
571
570
596
428 6. RAJAWAS
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
07
0
64 0
09
12 0
00
20 0
02
46 0
21
21 0
42
08
0
00
20 0
08
06 0
11
16 0
00
20 0
72
10
427/887
429
431
432
441
440
439
478 0
02
02 0
16
22 0
04
09
70 0
02
0
00
24 0
10
11
0
03
87 0
10
44 0
91
02
476(G /L Pasture)
0
14
61
477(G/L Pasture)
0
06
62
474(G/L Pasture)
0
01
30
484(G/L Pasture)
473
485 0
01
08
07
0
02 0
00
54
486/908(G/L Pasture)
02 0
16
487(G/L Pasture)
0
07
02
655 ( P.W.D. Road)
771
771/877 0
10
44 0
01
80
770/832
770
768 0
36
09
0
01
39 0
21
96 0
765/830
774
775
84
00
0
00
20 0
18
06 762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3
2
1
776 6. RAJAWAS ( Contd ... )
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
72
18
0
01
26
757 ( P.W.D. Road)
756
732
733
752
753
751
749 0
16
74 0
93
06
0
30
04
0
06
12
32 0
04
0
12
17
23 0
04
01
0
08
749/868
748
58 7. NANGALPUROHIT
46
45
44
43
42
38
39
41
40
36
25
26
22
21
18
17
26
01
0
0
00
96 0
27
14
40 0
05
0
06
12
12 0
06
0
04
03
20 0
00
05
40 0
00
0
20 0
13
66
02
54 0
0
12
50 0
01
98
52 0
02
0
21
96
48 0
09
96 0
00
60
09
0
16(J.D.A.Pasture)
15 0
01
56
05
10 0
12(J.D.A.Pasture)
20
02
70/1242( J.D.A.Pasture) 0
0
02
06
114(J.D.A.Pasture)
03
16 0
115 ( J.D.A.Nala)
09
00 0
116(J.D.A.Pasture)
05
55 0
198/1298
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
763
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
1
3
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
0
17
64
113/1297
7. NANGALPUROHIT ( Contd ... )
32 0
10
111 ( J.D.A.Pasture)
110
201
107
105
10
0
98 0
17
20
0
68
13
0
23
76 0
22
75
72( J.D.A.Pasture)
8. CHHAWARKAWAS
0
12
96
279(J.D.A . Pasture)
0
11
16
278( J.D.A . Nala)
07
0
02
277( J.D.A . Pasture)
0
00
25
263(J.D.A. Cart Track)
276
271
273
264
272
273
270
269
268
287 9. CHETAWALA
286
241
282
283
242
243
238
240
133
135
136
137
139
142
141
12
0
64 0
46
08
20 0
00
0
00
33 0
01
32 0
00
20 0
05
90 0
14
58 0
04
05
0
02
15 0
72
10
0
16
09 0
00
20 0
00
43
71 0
09
85 0
00
34 0
11
68 0
01
0
02
94 0
00
88 0
09
36
10
45 0
07 0
14
92 0
11
0
04
01 764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Area
Khasara No.
Are
Hectare
Sr. No
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
3
4
2
5
6 1
143
0
07
56 9. CHETAWALA (Contd ... )
0
20
144
00
0
28
145
15
107
0
02
80
20
0
00
106(G/L Cart Track)
20
03
105
0
38
13
0
88
87
0
56
08
0
04
82
07
0
00
20
85
0
16
70
83
0
01
47
158 (G/L Cart track)
0
00
70
159
22
40
0
162
00
50
0
161
0
01
44
176 (G /L Cart track)
72
0
09
201
0
14
04
200
0
36
09
199
0
20
00
182
0
10
80
185
0
10
80
184
08
0
64
183
0
36
03
188
00
27
0
196
10. BADANPURA
20
34
0
197
44
01
0
199 (G/L Cart Track)
62
37
0
213
88
11
0
202
58
32
0
205
03
94
0
254
00
64
253
0
40
247
0
04
00
0
20
252
72
0
09
248
0
40
03
250 भारत की राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
249 10. BADANPURA (Contd ...)
243
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
5
6 0
40
14
0
01
81 0
20
272/403
275
313
312
315
311
318
310
304
305
303
301 11. KHORASHYAMDAS
00
0
00
20 0
06
65 0
10
44 0
50
04
0
06
84 0
13
83
18
36 0
0
54
09
0
16
92 0
00
20 0
36
09
0
12
15
199(G/P Pasture)
0
26
01
209/1841 (G /P Pasture)
209
207
210
206
121
96
98
99
63
62
53
54
51
52
45
43
44
38
37 0
11
52 0
68
00
00
20 0
0
18
99
04 0
01
00
0
30
22
77 0
14 0
22
06
12 0
42 0
03
13
23 0
20 0
00
04
26 0
0
01
49
01 0
08
0
07
29
16 0
11
32 0
04
21
15
0
0
98
01
262(G/L Cart Track)
109 GI/2005-14 766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2, 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] .
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Nameof the Village
3
2
1
292 11. KHORASHYAMDAS
293 (Contd... )
295
296
297
298
299
300
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
969
970
970/1810
978
974
975
977
976
990
991
228 12. DEGDAS
229
230 (G /LCart Track)
219
218
217
216
215
214 13. CHONP
436
438/2475
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
0
06
03
10
0
44
30 0
06
0
74
06
20 0
00
0
10
88
03 0
02
30 0
01
0
12
96
01
0
20 0
11
42 0
12
87
}
0
02
10 0
00
20
00
0
29
10
89 0
0
02
52 0
05
04 0
76
05
0
75
15
0
00
20 0
09
18 0
05
04
00
0
49 0
07
92 0
28
08
0
01
12
07
0
20 0
06
00 0
19
16
06
12 0
36 0
09
0
00
20 0
21
06 0
00
20 767 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005/ माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : AMER
District : JAIPUR
Area
Hectare Are
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Nameof the Village
4
5
6
3
2
1
03
44
0
13. CHONP ( Contd ... )
438(G/L Pasture)
76
05
0
437(G/L Pasture)
74
0
16
439(G/L Pasture)
0
32
04
475(G/L Pasture)
0
76
32
441
0
03
60
464
12
78
465
0
12
462
31
0
00
0
05
461(G / L Cart Track)
582
0
01
00
0
20
02
583
40
0
06
584
0
00
96
456
0
52
456/2401
02
0
06
49
455
0
01
452
89
32
0
370/2313
04
10
0
586
02
16
0
02
670( G/L Nala)
0
02
08
587
0
02
588
88
0
01
589/2332
35
03
42
0
589
78
0
03
590
0
03
60
591
0
03
24
592
0
06
84
669
0
04
05
668
0
00
83
666
0
12
667
04
46
0
08
676
19
677
0
08
0
20
00
681
0
00
20
680
0
84
06
679
0
01
08
715 (G/L Cart track)
768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
245 13. CHONP ( Contd ... )
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
13
68 0
00
90
244/2275
244
168
172 0
16
20 0
13
14 0
12
87 0
175/2478
188
187
186
191
94
92
93
90
89
00
99 0
15
84 0
00
20 0
11
52
12
0
15 0
18
72 0
09
54 0
76
07
0
07
92 0
13
68
01
0
26
821(G /L Cart Track)
819
820
824
833
825
828
830
852 0
12
78 0
13
68 0
33
08 0
07
30 0
02
00 0
00
20
02
73 0
0
27
17 0
13
86
854/2182/2402
854 0
00
63 0
20
854/2182
00
0
00
855/2183
855
48
94 0
05
0
15
855/2183/2403
857
859
08 0
13
68 0
05
94 0
04
68
859/2377
899
898 0
03
40
61 0
29 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
769
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : AMER
District : JAIPUR Sr. No
Khasara No. Nameof the Village
3 1
2
894 13. CHONP ( Contd ...)
895
892
887
886
885
923
967 (G /LCartTrack)
959
958(G/L Pasture)
952(G/L Pasture)
952/2356
950 ( G/L Pasture)
951
934
678 14. ISHARAWALA
677
679
676(G/L Cart Track)
667
666
696
663
643
640(G/L)
639
583(G/L Nala)
582(G/L)
581
491
489(G/L)
490(G/L)
501
503
502 State: RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
6
5
82 0
04
21 0
15
0
02
88
03 0
06
20 0
00
26
0
99 0
00
58 0
66
06
0
07
74
06
30 0
0
01
89 }
01
0
35
00
20 0
11
70 0
0
82
08
0
50
13
0
73
08
0
02
70
01
60 0
0
22
56 0
01
89 0
30
00
0
25
80 0
03
32 0
02
08 0
12
06
03
58 0
21
0
85 0
14
69
00
20 0
0
01
51 0
07
05 0
51
02
02
36 0 770
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : AMER
District : JAIPUR
Area
Khasara No.
Hectare
S No
Are Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
3
4
6 1
2
504
0
02
45 14. ISHARAWALA ( Contd ... )
505
0
02
63.
506
0
01
44
0
507
09
81
0
00
63
510
0
00
77
511
03
512
0
01
62
01
0
509
22
12
0
513
0
15
55
514
0
74
07
434/830(G/L Pasture)
0
09
06
465
0
00
462
96
0
17
64
471
50
07
0
664
10
0
53
605
15. BILONCHI
11
0
606
43
0
07
83
610
07
02
0
600(G/L Cart Track)
0
13
2
05
0
20
533
09
27
09
0
536
10
40
0
538
20
03
537
0
0
96
08
546
0
04
06
547
01
70
0
545
26
0
01
548
07
15
0
549
06
0
28
544
0
00
90
510 (G/L Cart Track)
61
0
14
509
0
00
20
508
0
09
18
503
01
58
0
502 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
771
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : AMER
District : JAIPUR Sr. No
Khasara No. Nameof the Village
1
2
3
501 15. BILONCHI ( Contd ...)
499
384(G/L Nala)
385
390
390/1755(G/L)
235 (G/L Cart Track)
254 16. SHREEGOVINDPURA
255
259
260
260/492
260/494
260/493
260/489
262
423
432
434
435
421 (G /L Cart Track)
411(G/L)
411/496(G/L)
420(G/L Cart Track)
419(G/L)
415(G/L)
404/498
403
397/500
390/501
391
385/503
386/502
390(G/L)
386(G/L) State : RAJASTHAN Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
06
57 0
12
24 0
01
08
42 0
12
0
34
20 0
00
34 0
02
34 0
06
84 0
06
57
07
0
83 0
11
25 0
05
22 0
01
80 0
06
75 0
01
65 0
00
20 0
06
30 0
10
26 0
10
62 0
14
22 0
02
52 0
05
76 0
02
43 0
01
68 0
04
95 0
12
78 0
04
32 0
29
70 0
28
44 0
09
74
00
0
80 0
00
20 0
07
70 0
00
20 0
84
03 772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Are
Hectare
Name of the Village
Sq.mtr. 1
2
3
5
6
4
0
76
17
16. SHREEGOVINDPURA
387(G/L)
0
22
86
378(G/L)
(Contd...)
0
38
25
379(G/L)
01
0
62
371/560 (G /L Cart Track)
0
70
02
370/559 (G /L Pasture)
11
370
0
70
03
362
0
40
365
0
02
88
03
363
0
60
367
0
00
20
0
361
08
04
0
77
360
04
05
76
0
355/469
355
66
70
0
0
26 17. GHATWADA
860
19
36
862
0
09
0
07
863
83
0
01
17
864(G/L Nala)
0
866
29
79
63
0
27
874
33
03
0
953/1191
07
787/1201
0
09
0
00
74
787/1183
In Bet Svy No. 787/1183
62
0
01
& 787
00
20
787
0
01
44
0
787/1199(G/L)
0
13
95
786
0
14
58
785
0
34
02
781
02
43
0
772(G/ L Cart Track)
0
04
731
14
07
47
730
0
49
0
05
729
0
16
11
725 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
773
भारंत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
724 17. GHATWADA ( Contd ... )
704/1164
704
712
705
710
711
709
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6
10
80 0
0
05
94 0
16
83
00
20 0
0
04
50 0
06
93 0
00
99 0
11
34 0
02
70
674(G /L Cart Track)
665
668
666
667 0
08
10 0
09
83
00
67 0
05
0
29
03
0
15
634(G/L Cart Tack)
533
534
535
537 0
00
24 0
10
80 0
07
73 0
02
87 0
13
49
536(G/ L Cart Track)
564
539
540 0
00
32 0
02
26
00
0
20
560/998/1223
0
00
20
02
23 0
539/1137(G/L)
0
44
01
560/998
560
544
546
3004 18. MANPURAMACHEDI
3008
3006
3000
2999
2998
2995 109 G1/2005-15
12
24 0
0
14
40
08
28 0
75
07
0
05
21 0
0
13
32
02
0
16
92 0
07
0
06
37 0
01
98 774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
2997 18. MANPURAMACHED !
2996 (Contd ...)
3048
3049
3050
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
5
6 0
05
16
50 0
04
0
05
05
09
58
74 0
03
0
01
22
3059(G / L Cart Track)
3100
3099
3098
3097
3096
3086
3085
3087
02
0
22
09
66 0
80
01
0
0
64
08
09
0
24 0
07
92 0
62
05
00
50 0
0
00
60
3084(G/L)
0
67
00
3083( G/L)
0
02
48
3074 (G / L Cart Track)
01
34 0
3110(G/ L)
3111
3123
3122
3125
3121
3127
3128
3130 0
32
15
0
46
08
00
0
20
02
52 0
0
72
09
0
06
91 0
40
05
40 0
02
0
03
36
3633( G /L Nala)
3616
3617
3619
3620
3622
3584
3585
3580
18
03
0
16 0
20
0
10
08
86
02
0
20 0
00
01
76 0
00
36 0
79 0
07 775
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : AMER
Khasara No. Sr. No.
Name of the Village
3 1
2
3579 18. MANPURAMACHEDI
3577 (Contd...)
3578
3573
3555
3572 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6
40
05
0
0
10
80
20
07
0
0
16
11
72 0
00
0
24
08
92 0
11
3562(G/L Pasture)
3560
20 0
08
66 0
02
3559(G/L Pasture )
0
64
39
3518(G/L Pasture)
0
40
14
3518/3703(G/L Pasture)
3520
3523
3524
3466
3465
3464
3463
3467 19. PUTHKABAS
11
52 0
0
52
02
0
36
09
0
05
04 0
04
80 0
06
12 0
14
40
20 0
00
0
72
00
3473(G/L Cart Track)
URF
0
10
80
1242(G/L)
1232 CHAWA KA BAS
0
07
56 0
02
16
1233(G/L Nala)
57
54
55
56 0
00
09
0
02
80 0
86
04
00 0
09.
0
01
44
72(G / L Cart Track)
73
80
79
78 0
68
04
32 0
00
0
07
24 0
07
92 0
01
86
78/1428
76 0
01
80
20 0
00
78/1430
776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : AMER
Khasara No. Sr. No.
Name of the Village
3 1
2
77 19. PUTHKABAS
77/1427 URF
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
5
6 4
22 0
05
60 0
03
66 0
02
227( P.W.D Road)
CHAWA KA BAS( Contd ...)
0
13
80
45(G/L)
44
47
60 0
.00
20 0
17
52
02
0
42/1414
42(G/L)
13(G/L)
00
24
0
25
95 0
34
20
0
13/1425
66
29
0
13/1552
05
11 0
13/1408
8
1982
2
3
76
05
0
0
24
89
26
0
88
72
08
0
01
68 0
4(G/L Pasture)
669 20. BILPURA
668
78
03
0
02
0
52
09 0
18
667/924
670
667
666
672
673
674
665
664
661
662
623
622
616
605
603
20
00
0
96
12
0
05
31 0
06
18 0
00
20 0
02
40 0
30 0
00
78 0
09
08 0
08
01
28 0
18 0
09
30 0
06
0
29
61
02
18 0
38 0
10 777
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
596 20. BILPURA ( Contd ...)
534
535
595
536
537
538
581
581/978(G /L)
580(G/L)
539
438
438/976(G/L)
579
539/977(G /L Nala)
437
524
579/986
584
578
577
572
574
571
567/912
567
564
562
563
555
556
376(G/L Nala)
369
312
313
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
16 0
09
02
32 0
0
08
32 0
00
72 0
01
50
05
0
84 0
05
60 0
09
72 }
03
0
06 0
00
93 0
00
80 0
00
66 0
01
56 0
01
20
01
0
18 0
00
60 0
04
41 0
40
02
0
00
48 0
42
23
0
01
62 0
00
36 0
08
64
02
16 0
0
16
20 0
72
09
07
0
57 0
10
56
01
47 0
02
0
05
03
18 0
19
0
98 0
03
15 0
01
96 778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
311 20. BILPURA ( Contd ... )
310
309
308
307
305 State : RAJASTHAN
Area Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
5
6
07
46 0
0
20
00
0
03
60 0
03
24 0
04
68 0
06
62
01
0
84
306(G/L)
00
0
96
318/859(G/L Cart Track)
0
20
00
318/860
0
97
17
161/857
00
0
39
161/858
161
00
20 0
0
03
20
287/949
0
01
12
287(G /L Nala)
289
288
01
30 0
0
06
18
14 0
04
272(G / L Cart Track)
271
267
266
268
265
31 21. SUNDARPURA
30
24
23
22
21
13
12
7
76 0
05
15
48 0
86 0
04
16 0
02
10
80 0
54
09
0
10
08 0
07
02 0
05
22 0
39
06
0
0
54
09
17
0
28
39
12
0
24 0
00
08
10 0
2(G/L Pasture)
35
41
42
40 0
00
07
74 0
0
10
98 779
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
44 21. SUNDARPURA ( Contd ... )
39
45
46
49
48 Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
04 0
06
20 0
00
40 0
05
78 0
06
0
68
01
02
58 0
89 0
01
55/748
55
54 0
02
56 0
09
54
00
20 0
53(G/L Pahad)
351
353
358
357
356
359
365
368
374
370
373
372
377
376
375
380
381
382
385
384
383
386
389
387
388
00
99 0
90 0
01
0
03
20
12
27 0
20 0
00
11
80 0
01
0
44
11
28 0
0
01
32
02
04 0
0
09
99 0
01
08 0
03
19
06
0
21 0
00
20
07
28 0
0
46
02
01
86 0
02
79 0
0
02
79
20
00
0
01
0
98 0
03
96 0
03
52 0
04
40 780
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
District : JAIPUR
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Sr. No
Khasara No.
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
Name of the Village
6
4
5
1
3
2
367
0
64
80 21. SUNDARPURA ( Contd ... )
0
19
13 22. LAMYAMEWAL
128(G/L Pahad)
0
18
85
129(G/L Pahad)
20
0
00
131
00
0
20
123/554
24
00
123
0
0
16
26
121
20
0
00
119
0
06
30
109
0
04
111
05
04
68
0
112
0
68
113
04
42
03
101
0
0
02
70
100
03
60
97
0
04
14
0
96
0
03
96
95
12
70
0
55
0
00
20
71
0
20
03
67
0
00
88
68(G/L River)
00
0
90
69(G/L)
86
0
04
64(G/L River)
06
12
0
63
14
76
0
60
09
0
54
58
0
50
04
55
0
05
04
54
72
0
09
53
0
72
04
48
02
0
84
47
46
0
00
84
71
04
45
0
00
20
0
39
94
0
14
40 781
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Tehsil : AMER
State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Khasara No. Sr. No
Name of the Village
1
2
3
37 22. LAMYAMEWAL (Contd ... )
36
28
35
31
29
30
20
17
19
18
14
11
10
4
3
2 23. DEV KA HARMADA
796
795
794
793
792
791
802
804
790
805
806
807
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6
00
20 0
0
10
20 0
07
94 0
00
84 0
02
38 0
03
85 0
05
59 0
94
05
0
00
20 0
03
36 0
00
96 0
05
76 0
07
09 0
07
74 0
07
38 0
06
48 0
06
12 0
10
08
0
03
06 0
06
84 0
02
61 0
03
60 0
24
03
0
20
00
10
0
80 0
00
20 0
07
92 0
90
04
00
0
40 0
01
44
428 (G/ L Cart Track)
422
423
299
300
298 109 GI/2005-16
0
09
90 0
09
94 0
01
68 0
15
72 0
03
00 782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : AMER
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3 23. DEV KA HARMADA ( Contd ... )
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
06
76
301( G /L Pasture)
297
205 0
05
86 0
01
17 0
16
36
419(G /L Pasture)
0
00
36
204/1204(G / L Pasture)
302
325 0
02
80 0
20
24
204/1397
0
08
04
204/1396
0
03
40
204/1391
}
0
00
200/1390
20
185/1221
174
171
170
169
340
341
120
118
117
347
348
351
352 0
09
54 0
11
57 0
04
86 0
07
11 0
06
30 0
84
06
0
02
79 0
01
12 0
01
51 0
76
05
0
07
56 0
08
28 0
30
08
0
02
07
352/1279
0
05
04 0
03
06
353/1280(G / L Khadda)
353
82
81
80
84
79
75
78
77 0
02
10 0
05
04
0
02
82 0
02
10 0
16
47 0
02
24 0
10
88 0
01
19
01
0
94 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Tehsil : AMER
783
District: JAIPUR
Sr. No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
77/1374 23. DEV KA HARMADA (Contd ...)
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are Sq.mtr. Hectare
4
5
6 0
82
03
0
20
22/1335
17/1334
21
01
0
01
80 0
18
36 0
10
21/1359
18
08
0
19
98 0
98
17/1328
17
17/1372
15
01
0
07
09 0
04
86 0
00
56 0
04
32
16(G/L Nala)
24. LAKHER
0
10
44
230(G/L Nala)
142
141
83
82
78
72
71
67
66
44
45
37
33
24
23
22
26
27
17
19
18 0
40
04
0
30
40
0
30
28 0
00
77
33
30 0
0
04
50 0
68
04
0
19
23
27 0
03
11
0
16
32 0
13
0
15
48
12
60 0
0
00
42 0
13
55 0
00
79
28 0
08
0
29
08
0
05
50
00
0
20
01
0
98
07
0
38
285 ( P.W.D Road)
291
66
96 0 784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : AMER
District : JAIPUR
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Sr. No Name of the Village
Khasara No.
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1
2
3
4
6
5
290
24. LAKHER ( Contd ... )
0
00
64
291/1295
0
01
56
294/1296
294/1296/1
0
24
48
294/1296/2
}
0
1(G/L River)
29
34 25. CHAK MANOHARPURA
0
00
72
457(G/L Pasture)
[No. R- 31015/70/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 18 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 257.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड है , के काकिनाडा - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन की ट्रंक लाइन से आंध्रप्रदेश राज्य में , पश्चिमी गोदावरी जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवाहन के लिये मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड व्दारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिये ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा (3) की उपधारा ( 1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिस को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा (3 ) की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री पी . बुच्चारेडडी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन परियोजना, 3-20-7/ 1 , राम मोहन रााजा नगर, अक्षरा स्कूल गेट के पास, काकिनाडा 533003, पूर्वी गोदावरी जिल्ला, आंध्रप्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 785
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
अनुसूची
जिल्हा: पश्चिमगोदावरि
मंडल : पेरवलि
गाँव का नाम
गट सं .। सब डिविजन सं .
2 1
25/6वि
1) कोरुपल्लि
25/6ए
26/5
26/4
25/1
27/2
27/1वि
18
17/4एफ
17/5
14/4सि
14/4बि
14/3सि
14/3बि
14/3ए
11/10
11/7
11/6
11/5
12/9
12/7
12/5তি
12/3
12/4
12/2
4/8
4/6
4/5
4/4
4/3बि
4/1वि
1
राज्य: आंद्रप्रदेश
आर ओ मैं अजूत करन के लिए मचिर्त के
हेक्टर
एर
सिएर
4
5 3
00
30
12
00
10
15
11
00
15
50
01
00
04
00
15
14
00
45
11
00
20
02
00
30 (सि एल)
26
00
30
03
00
65
07
05 00
10
75 00
05
00
55
05
00
60
05
00
00
07
00
50
06
00
85
05
00
60 00
01
80
01
60 00
00
95
05
14
00
15
80 00
00
00
10
85
10
00
45
17
00
20 00
08
20
00
00
35 00
09
65 00
00
30 00
19
90
75
06
00
(सिएल)
राज्य: आंद्रप्रदेश
जिल्हा: पश्चिमगोदावरि
मंडल: निडदवोलु
260/2वि 1) काल्वचेरला
260/ 2ए 00
03
05
30
00
25
निरंतर 3 786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1
2
96/3सि
3) पंदलपतु ( निरंतर )
96/2वि
96/3ए
106/3ए
106/2
106/1 ए
105/7
105/3बि
105/1 ए
105/4वि
104
78/3
78/2
78/4
77/11
77/10
129/2
129/1दि 2
129/1 बि1
129/1 ए
131/2बि
72/ 8ए
72/7
131/ 2ए
131/1
131/4
71
56/1
50/2ए
50/1डि
50/1सि
50/1बि
50/1 ए
55/2
55/1
51/3
45/1सि 1
45/1बि
45/10/2ए
43/5सि
43/5वि
43/5ए
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
4
3
5 00
01
25
01
10 (सिएल) 00
00
00
90 00
10
09
14
00
85 00
16
85
15
00
65 00
03
80 00
01
15 00
23
65 00
02
50 (जि एल)
08
85 00
00
30
10
00
04
55 00
25
20
00
00
15
00
75 00
00
09
70
09
45 00
00
40
01
(सि एल)
00
40 (सिएल) 00
10
00
85
00
00
85
75 00
06
00
18
25 00
01
55 00
04
95 (सिएल)
00
20
29
00
09
85
45 00
04
00
03
65
70 00
03
00
00
20
07
00 00
65 00
12
40
00
22
13
00
25
00
00
50 (सि एल )
00
00
55
02
05
00
00
85 (सिएल) 00
00
01
20 787
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2 1
43/4वि
3) पंदलपतु ( निरंतर )
43/1 ए
44
66/4
4) पुरुषोत्तमपल्लि
66/2
66/7
67/7
67/5
67/4
67/6
67/3
67/1
35/9
35/5
70/5
70/4
70/6ए
70/2
70/1
71
72/4वि
72/3डि 2
72/3बि
72/3ए2वि
72/3ए2ए
72/ 3ए 1
33/7
33/ 2वि
33/1
75/8
75/4
32/7
32/6
75/2
75/1
24/4
76/4
76/3
76/1
76/2
78
3
4
5 00
20
35 00
01
40 (सि एल)
03
70 00
* (सि एल)
01
00
40 00
19
95 00
18
10 00
08
30 00
08
25 00
07
20 00
00
70 00
03
30 00
11
55 00
02
15 00
01
65 00
04
70 00
06
85 00
35
11
00
10
10 00
00
15 00
04
90 (सिएल)
23
00
25 00
00
05 00
04
05 (जिएल)
00
07
30 00
07
55
00
00
60 (सि एल)
00
00
15
00
02
35
00
00
65 (जि एल)
00
02
45
05
85
00
00
09
80
00
00
95
00
11
40
00
05
50
02
00
75
00
04
25
00
11
05
00
16
45
00
10
05
05
85 (जि एल) 00 788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
1
2
96/4
5) विज्जेश्वरम
100/3
100/4
100/2
100/1
99/5
99/4
99/3
71
68/2
69/2सि
69/2बि
69/2ए
69/1
40/3
40/2
41/1
39
37/6बि
37/5डि
37/1सि
37/3ए
36
जिल्हा: पश्चिमगोदावरि मंडल: कोव्वूर
262/1 ए 1) मददूर
261
263/1
257/ 1 ए
258/1
246
244
245/1
242/3
242/2
242/1
241/9
241/7
241/6
241/4
241/5
240/1 ए
[PART II-SEC: 3 (ii) ] 3
4
5 00
07
55 00
25
06
00
31
25 00
03
90 00
07
70 00
09
55 00
09
35 00
10
15
75
08
00
00
10
20 00
20
06
00
06
15
05
00
55 00
12
70 00
13
15 00
14
35 00
03
85 00
52
00
02
80 00
00
26
15 00
02
20 00
02
35
04
75 (सिएल) 00
राज्य: आंद्रप्रदेश
00
09
65
29
30 00
00
31
60 00
17
25 00
29
05
36
45 (सिएल) 00
10
15 00
(सिएल)
00
00
15
25 00
05
00
06
85
06
00
25
12
00
40
05
45 00
15 00
06
15
00
35 00
10
16
00
05
80 789 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
3
5
2
1
05
00
00
240/1वि
1.) मददूर ( निरंतर )
20
04
00
240/1सि
14
00
55
240/2
20
00
50
239/1
00
35
05
239/2
03
30
239/3
(सि एल ) 00
[फा. सं. एल-14014/45/2004- जी.पी. ]
एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 18th January, 2005
S. O. 257.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the trunk line of Kakinada-Hyderabad Pipeline of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, a company promoted by M/ s Reliance Industries Limited, to the various consumers of West Godavari District in the state of Andhra Pradesh , a Pipeline should be laid by M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that the purpose of laying the said Pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section ( 3 ) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub - section ( 1) of section (3 ) of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri P. Butcha Reddy, Competent Authority , Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited , Pipeline Project , 3-20-7/ 1 , Rama Mohana Raja Nagar , Near Akshara School Gate , Kakinada- 533003 , East Godavari Dist, Andhra Pradesh State .
109 GI/2005-17 790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
Schedule Mandal: PERAVALI
District : West Godavari Village
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
1
2
25/6B
1) KORUPALLI
25/6A
26/5
26/4
25/1
27/2
27/1B
18
17/4F
17/5
14/4C
14/4B
14/3C
14/3B
14/3A
11/10
11/7
11/6
11/5
12/9
12/7
12/5D
12/3
12/4
12/2
4/8
4/6
4/5
4/4
4/3B
4/1B
1
Mandal : NIDADAVOLU
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] State: Andhra Pradesh
[ Ared to be acquired for ROU Hectare Are C-Are 3
4
5 00
12
30 00
10
15 00
11
15
01
00
50 00
04
15
14
00
45 00
11
20 00
02
30 (CL)
30 00
26
00
03
65 00
07
05 00
10
75 00
05
55
60 00
05
00
05
00 00
07
50
06
85 00
00
05
60 00
01
80
01
00
60 00
05
95
14
00
15 00
00
80 00
10
85
10
00
45 00
17
20 00
08
20
00
00
35 00
09
65 00
30
00
00
19
90
06
00
75 (CL)
State:
District : West Godavari
260/2B 1 ) KALAVECHERLA
260/2A
257/1
Andhra Pradesh 00
05
03
00
30
25 00
95
19 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2 1
254/4A
1 ) KALAVECHERLA ( Contd .... )
254/3B
254/3A
254/2
254/1
224/5
224/4B/C
224/4B/1B
224/4B/1A
224/2A
221
222
11/3
2) JEEDIGUNTA
11/2A
10/7
10/4
10/3
10/2
9/5A
9/4
9/2
9/1
8/3A
8/2
7
5/1
4
1
3/1A
93/5C 3) PANDALPARRU
93/4
93/3
93/2
95/2A
95/1
95/2B
96/5A
96/5C
96/4C3
96/4C2
96/4A
791 3
5
4
70 00
09
20 00
06
75 00
04
00
10
95
08
00
80 00
90
13
00
04
50
06
00
35 00
06
45 00
01
30 (GL)
00
34
15 00
02
90 (GL)
00
06
25 00
00
50 00
11
70 00
50
11.
05
00
55 00
05
50 00
25
12
00
05
85
40
04
00
02
65
00
30 00
00
60
27
00
02
15 (CL)
00
20
65 00
48
75
03
15 (GL) 00
00
45
00
00
00
09
07
90
70
05
04
00 ού
55
18
00
45 (GL) 00
00
10
12
00
11
35 00
05
85
00
00
05 00
00
35 (GL)
65 00
15 792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1
2
96/3C
3 ) PANDALPARRU ( Contd .... )
96/2B
96/3A
106/3A
106/2
106/1A
105/7
105/3B
105/1A
105/4B
104
78/3
78/2
78/4
77/11
77/10
129/2
129/1B2
129/1B1
129/1A
131/2B
72/8A
72/7
131/2A
131/1.
131/4
71
56/1
50/2A
50/1D
50/1C
50/1B
50/1A
55/2
55/1
51/3
45/1C1
45/1B
45/1A/2A
43/5C
43/5B
43/5A
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3
4
5 00
01
25 00
01
(CL)
10 00
00
90 00
09
10 00
14
85 00
16
85 00
15
65 00
03
80 00
01
15 00
23
65 00
02
(GL)
50 00
08
85 00
10
30 00
04.
55 00
20
25 00
00
15 00
00
75 00
70
09
00
09
45
01
(CL) 00
40 00
00
(CL)
40 00
10
85 00
00
85 00
06
75 00
18
25 00
01
55 00
(CL)
04
95 00
29
20 00
09
85 00
04
45 00
03
65 00
03
70 00
00
20 00
07
00 00
12
65 00
22
40 00
13
25 00
(CL)
00
50 00
00
55 00
02
05 00
00
(CL)
85 00
01
20 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2,1926
1
2
43/4B
3 ) PANDALPARRU ( Contd .... )
43/1A
44
4) PURUSHOTTAMPALLI
66/4
66/2
66/7
67/7
67/5
67/4
67/6
67/3
67/1
35/9
35/5
70/5
70/4
70/6A
70/2
70/1
71
72/4B
72/3D2
72/3B
72/3A2B
72/3A2A
72/3A1
33/7
33/2B
33/ 1A
75/8
75/4
32/7
32/6
75/2
75/1
24/4
76/4
76/3
76/1
76/2
78
793 3
4
5 00
20
35
01
(CL) 00
40 (CL) 00
03
70 00
01
40 00
19
95 00
18
10 00
08
30 00
08
25. 00
07
20 00
00
70 00
03
30 00
11
55 00
02
15 00
01
65 00
04
70 00
06
85 00
11
35 00
10
10 00
00
15 00
(CL)
04
90 00
23
25 00
00
05 00
04
(GL)
05 00
07
30 00
07
55 00
(CL)
00
60 00
00
15 00
02
35 00
(GL)
00
65 00
02
45 00
05
85 00
09
80 00
00
95 00
11
40 00
05
50 00
02
75 00
04
25 00
11
05 00
16
45 00
05
10
05
(GL) 00
85 794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
2 1
96/4
5) VIJJESHWARAM
100/3
100/4
100/2
100/1
99/5
99/4
99/3
71
68/2
69/2C
69/2B
69/2A
69/1
40/3
40/2
41/1
39
37/6B
37/5D
37/1C
37/3A
36
District:
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3
4
5
07
00
55 00
25
06
00
31
25
03
00
90
07
00
70
55
09
00
00
35
09
00
10
15 00
75
08
20 00
10
06
00
20
06
00
15 00
05
55 00
12
70
15 00
13
14
35 00
85 00
03
00 00
52
00
02
80 00
15
26
20 00
02
00
02
35
75
04
00
(CL)
Andhra Pradesh
West Godavari
Mandal : KOVVURU
262/1A 1) MADDURU
261
263/1
257/1A
258/1
246
244
245/1
242/3
242/2
242/1
241/9
241/7
241/6
241/4
241/5
240/1A State:
00
09
65
30 00
29
00
31
60 00
25
17
00
05
29
00
45
36
(CL)
10
15 00
(CL)
00
00
15 00
05
25 00
06
85
25 00
06
40 00
12
45 00
05
06
00
15
15
35 00
16
00
10 00
05
80 795 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
1
2
3
5
4
240/1B
00
00
05 1) MADDURU ( Contd .... )
240/1C
00
04
20
240/2
00
14
55
239/1
00
20
50
239/2
00
05
35
239/3
03
30
(CL) 00
[ F. No. L - 14014/45/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 18 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 258.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड है , के काकिनाडा - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन की ट्रंक लाइन से आंध्रप्रदेश राज्य में , पूर्वी गोदावरी जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवाहन के लिये मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड व्दारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिये ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3) की उपधारा ( 1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिस को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा ( 3 ) की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री पी . बुच्चारेडडी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन परियोजना, 3-20-7/ 1 , राम मोहन रााजा नगर , अक्षरा स्कूल गेट के पास, काकिनाडा 533003, पूर्वी गोदावरी जिल्ला, आंध्रप्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
अनुसूची मंडल :
जिल्हा: इस्ट गोदावरि आतेयपुरम
गाँव का नाम
गट सं . । सब डिविजन सं .
2 1
34
1) कटटुंग
35/7
35/6ए
35/6बि
35/5
35/10
36/ 1बि 1
36/1बि 2
36/2ए
36/3ए
36/4ए
36/5ए
45/3
45/5ए
46/2
46/3ए
46/4ए
46/7
49/4
49/5
49/7
49/9
49/11
49/12
50/2
50/5
42/2
68
67/ 2वि
70/1
70/3
70/2
71/1
71/2
71/3
74/1
74/2
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] राज्य: आंद्रप्रदेश
और ओयू अजित करने केलिए हेक्टर
सिएर
एर
3
4
5
45
02
(जि एल) 00
00
02
05 00
08
50
00
80 (जिएल) 00
05
00
90 00
02
90
00
00
65 (सिएल)
12
95 .00
04
00
75
40 00
04
00
04
25
90 00
03
05
10
00
50
11
00
07
00
35
06
90 00
90 00
00
12
00
80
02
70 00
05
00
10
06
00
80
04
40 00
09
95 00
00
06
80
13
00
70
13
00
20
13
15 00
00
40
55
06
00
55 00
10
12
15
00
25
95 00
03
00
01
40
00
12
40
00
11
50
10
00
11
00
75
28
114 797
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1
2
91/1व
1) कटटुंग ( निरंतर )
91/7वि
91/6
77
85/5
85/3
85/4
84/1ए
84/1वि
84/2
84/5
83/2
83/6
83/10ए
86
174/1
174/2
180
179
181
183/1
185/1
16/1
2) लोल्ला
17/1
20/1 ए
20/1वि
20/2
20/4वि
20/5
20/6
20/7
20/8
21/1
21/2
8
3) अंकमपालेम
7
6/1
6/2
6/3
6/4
32/4
32/3
32/5 109 GI/2005-18
3
4
5
01
20 (जि एल) 00
00
02
20 00
35
01
00
07
85 (सि एल)
00
13
85 00
60
01
00
20
00
00
02
45 00
00
80 00
19
80 00
06
20 00
10
07
00
07
05 00
02
85
01
25 (सिएल) 00
01
60 (सि एल) 00
00
03
40 (सिएल)
00
24
80
23
00
60
16
30 00
(सि एल)
00
20
80 00
03
15 (सि एल)
28
15 00
14
05 00
00
00
80 (सिएल)
09
00
45 00
00
55
10
85 00
00
08
55 00
08
85 00
06
65
00 00
06
00
75
28
00
00
60
01
75 (जि एल) 00
00
07
75
18
00
30 00
45
00
70
04
00
25
13
00
03
15 00
00
05
00
05
20
00 798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1
2 3) अंकमपालेम ( निरंतर
32/6
32/7ए
32/8ए
32/18ए
32/19
32/16
31/1
31/2
48
49/1
49/4
49/5
50
60
58/6ए
61/1
61/2
61/3
58/ 8ए
62/1
57/2ए
57/50
89/4
88/1ए
88/2ए
88/3ए
88/4
88/5
88/6
88/7
86/2
71/1
85/1
85/2
85/3
85/4ए
86/4
86/5
84/4ए
84/4वि
76/1
80/1
80/2
4+1
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 3
4
5 00
00
10 00
08
45 00
10
25 00
13
95 00
02
20 00
05
(सि एल)
70 00
00
35 00
13
30 00
28
35 00
00
20 00
03
45 00
04
65 00
25
60 00
04
(सि एल)
20 00
02
95 00
48
90 00
02
(सि एल )
30 00
05
65 00
02
15 00
00
65 00
13
25 00
15
60 00
04
45 00
02
85 00
06
35 00
09
40 00
12
10 00
11
60 00
10
00 00
09
50 00
18
70 00
00
55 00
03
80 00
07
75 00
20
45 00
01
85 00
00
60 00
00
30 00
24
35 00
02
(सि एल)
25 00
04
35 00
20
75 00
18
25 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
1
2
81
3) अंकमपालेम ( निरंतर )
79/5
4) र्यालि
50
55/1 ए
55/1वि
56/8
56/9
57/1थि
57/3
57/2वि
57/7वि
57/8
57/10
63/1
63/6
63/8
63/11
63/12
63/15
63/13
63/14
69/1 ए
69/3वि2
69/4
68/2
67/2
67/1
110/7
110/5
114/2ए
114/4ए
114/50
111/12
111/13
111/14ए
111/15सि
111/18ए
112
99
96
95/5
199
799 3
4
5 00
11
80 00
08
50 00
05
(सि एल)
45 00
40
30 00
(सि एल)
00
25 00
00
55 00
03
65 00
02
50 00
06
75 00
00
05 00
09
85 00
07
00 00
08
60 00
07
90 00
04
30 00
04
70 00
08
85 00
07
00 00
00
50 00
02
30 00
04
90 00
00
45 (सि एल)
00
12
65 00
19
15 00
69
30
01
75 (सि एल) 00
00
00
(जि एल)
80 00
23
35 00
06
35 00
00
45 00
03
15
06
85
01
05 00
06
30 00
07
85 00
02
70 00
14
70 00
02
30 00
04
(सिएल)
25 00
54
00 00
09
70 00
15
10 00
04
(सिएल)
55 800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
2
1
200 4) (निरंतर)
202
223/1वि
223/ 1 ए
223/2वि
223/3
212/1थि
222/1
212/2
212/3
212/4
211/16
211/17
211/18
210
314/3
314/4
314/5
312
313/2
316
317/1
317/2
318/2
325/4
325/3
325/90
325/10
326/22
327
328/3
328/4
345
346/4
344/1
344/3
344/2
344/4
344/5
344/6
342/3
343
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5 00
33
00 00
00
15 00
18
70 00
01
25 (सिएल)
13
70 00
00
08
20 00
13
00 00
10
00
00
03
10
04
90 00
70
08
00
03
30 00
00
00
05 00
09
95 00
00
95 00
03
55 (सि एल)
00
10
60 00
75
04
10 00
00
00
58
05 00
03
55
95
03
00
(सि एल)
70 00
08
16
00
85
40 00
00
00
14
20 00
95
01
00
11
30 00
10
90
18
85 00
34
00
20
13
35 00
13
95 00
03
85 00
(सि एल)
01
00
25
09
00
30
40 00
02
00
00
05
11
00
30
00
70
05
10
00
60
00
45
15
05
07
(सिएल) 00
111 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
1
2
383
4) यालि ( निरंतर )
384/1
384/4
385/1
385/2
मंडल: रावुलपालेम
जिल्हा: इस्ट गोदावरि
123
1) लक्ष्मीपोलवराम
122
124/1
124/2
124/3
132/1
125/3
125/7
125/4
125/5
125/10
125/11
126/3
126/4
126/5
126/10
126/11
126/12
128/5
128/6
128/7
108/1
107/1
108/6
106/6
106/7
105/2
105/1
105/4
105/5
102/1
104/2
104/3
103
74/1
74/3
238
801 3
4
5 00
29
30 00
15
75 00
16
65 00
09
55 00
26
85 राज्य: आंद्रप्रदेश
00
03
35 (जिएल)
00
06
45 00
21
30 00
07
75 00
14
75 00
00
25 00
05
30 00
08
95 00
06
10 00
03
55 00
03
90 00
06
55 00
02
25 00
04
40 00
07
25 00
05
30 00
08
65 00
01
15 00
05
65 00
06
65 00
21
75 00
09
05 00
08
65 00
10
15 00
09
55 00
09
90 00
24
00 00
00
30 00
00
15 00
14
65 00
26
75 00
11
95 00
19
50 00
03
60 (सिएल)
00
24
80 00
00
60
03
(जिएल) 00
30 802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
1
2
237/6 1) लक्ष्मीपोलवराम ( निरंतर )
237/7
237/8
237/10
237/11
237/12
237/13
240
241/1
241/2
241/3
242/6
242/5
243/1
243/2
243/4
243/6
243/9
244/1
244/3
244/2
244/5
229/2
229/3
229/7
229/4
253/11
253/9
253/8
253/7
253/4
253/5
267
263
262
261/1ए
285/2
287
62/2 2) वेदिरेश्वरम
63/1
72/1
71/1
72/3
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3
4
5 00
00
45 00
04
45
06
00
55 00
05
05 00
05
55
04
00
85 00
03
80 00
01
95 (सिएल)
00
04
55
12
00
60 00
00
95 00
09
15 00
17
75 00
11
30 00
02
30 00
12
55 00
08
30 00
22
00 00
10
20 00
07
85 00
00
35 00
23
25 00
17
05 00
03
45
05
60 00
00
00
01
26
00
25 00
00
40 00
05
95
05
00
35 00
06
25 00
09
65 00
03
95 (जिएल)
00
57
05 00
02
90 (सि एल)
00
40
08
95 00
32
02
00 (जि एल) 00
00
80
23
00
17
25
00
21
20
03
00
15
00
40
07 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
1
2 2) वेदिरेश्वरम ( निरंतर )
71/2
70/1
70/2
70/3
70/5
70/6
80
78/6
79/1
79/4
79/5
79/3
81/1
82/1
82/2
82/3
109/1
109/3
109/4
109/5
134/1
134/7
134/5
134/6
134/9
133/4
104
103/2
3) केतराजुपल्ले
106
111/2
111/3
111/8
111/10
111/9
110/2
110/7
110/8
110/9
110/10
110/22
109/1
803 3
4
5 00
07
50 00
08
85 00
00
05 00
15
05
04
00 (सिएल) 00
00
11
80
04
(सिएल) 00
10 00
01
55 00
08
70 00
10
90 00
08
95 00
00
75 00
42
80 00
03
50 00
11
15 00
12
95 00
04
55 00
00
40 00
16
40 00
07
60 00
10
80 00
11
10 00
02
40 00
13
50 00
18
-10 00
04
(सिएल)
90
00
60 (सि एल) 00
00
08
60 00
06
20 (सिएल)
00
00
05 00
07
55 00
02
25 00
00
25 00
10
35 00
03
15 00
03
30 00
05
35 00
05
45 00
08
15 00
07
70 00
05
75 00
00
70 00
00
55 804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5 3) केतराजुपल्ले ( निरंतर )
109/4
00
01
15
109/5
00
05
50
109/6
00
00
45
108/8
00
13
80 4) देवापल्ले
151/4
00
19
55
151/3
00
10
40
152
01
25
(सि एल) 00
153
00
00
50
(जि एल)
139-1
00
06
70
140-1
00
04
50
140-2
00
00
05
141-1
00
27
45
141-2
00
21
05
140-5
00
08
10
150
14
60
(सि एल) 00
17/3
00
50
(जि एल) 00
[फा. सं. एल -14014/46/2004- जी.पी. ]
एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 18th January, 2005
S. O. 258. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the trunk line of Kakinada-Hyderabad Pipeline of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, a company promoted by M/ s Reliance Industries Limited, to the various consumers of East Godavari District in the state of Andhra Pradesh, a Pipeline should be laid by M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited ;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that the purpose of laying the said Pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section (3 ) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub -section ( 1 ) of section (3) of the said Act, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri P. Butcha Reddy , Competent Authority , Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, Pipeline Project , 3-20-7/ 1 , Rama Mohana Raja Nagar, Near Akshara School Gate, Kakinada- 533003 , East Godavari Dist, Andhra Pradesh State .
1-1 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
Schedule Mandal :ATREYA PURAM
District : East Godavari Village
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
1
2 1) KATTUNGA
34
35/7
35/6A
35/6B
35/5
35/10
36/1B1
36/182
36/2A
36/3A
36/4A
36/5A
45/3
45/5A
46/2
46/3A
46/4A
46/7
49/4
49/5
49/7
49/9
49/11
49/12
50/2
50/5
42/2
68
67/2B
70/1
70/3
70/2
71/1
71/2
71/3
74/1
74/2
91/1B
109 GI/2005-19
805 State: Andhra Pradesh
Area to be acquind Hectare
ROU Are C-Are 3
4
5 00
02
(GL)
45 00
02
05 00
08
50 00
(GL)
00
80 00
05
90 00
02
90 00
(CL)
00
65 00
12
95 00
04
75 00
04
40 00
04
25 00
03
90 00
10
05 00
11
50 00
07
35 00
06
90 00
00
90 00
12
80 00
02
70 00
05
10 00
06
80 .
00
04
40 00
09
95 00
06
80 00
13
70 00
13
20 00
13
15 00
40
55 00
06
55 00
12
10 00
15
25 00
03
95 00
01
40 00
12
40 00
11
50 00
11
10 00
28
75
01
20 (GL) 00 806
THE GAZETTE OF
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
TANIJARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
1
2
91/7B
1) KATTUNGA ( Contd .... )
91/6
77
85/5
85/3
85/4
84/1A
84/1B
84/2
84/5
83/2
83/6
83/10A
86
174/1
174/2
180
179
181
183/1
185/1
16/1
2) LOLLA
17/1
20/1A
20/1B
20/2
20/4B
20/5
20/6
20/7
20/8
21/1
21/2
8
3 ) ANKAMPALEM
7
6/1
6/2
6/3
6/4
32/4
32/3
32/5
32/6 3
4
5 00
02
20 00
01
35 00
07
85 (CL)
00
13
85 00
60
01
00
20 00
00
02
45 00
00
80
19
00
80 00
06
20 00
07
10 00
05
07
00
85
02
01
00
25 (CL)
01
60 (CL) 00
00
40
03
(CL)
00
24
80
60
23
00
00
16
30 (CL)
00
20
80 00
03
15 (CL)
00
28
15
05 00
14
80 00
00
(CL)
00
09
45
00
00
55
10
00
85
08
00
55 00
85
08
00
06
65 00
00
06
00
75
28
00
00
60
75
01
(GL) 00
00
07
75 00
30
18
45 00
00
70 00
04
00
25
13
03
00
15
05 00
00
00
05
20
10 00
00
144 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
1
2
32/7A
3 ) ANKAMPALEM (Contd ....)
32/8A
32/18A
32/19
32/16
31/1
31/2
48
49/1
49/4
49/5
50
60
58/6A
61/1
61/2
61/3
58/8A
62/1
57/2A
57/5A
89/4
88/1A
88/2A
88/3A
88/4
88/5
88/6
88/7
86/2
71/1
85/1
85/2
85/3
85/4A
86/4
86/5
84/4A
84/4B
76/1
80/1
80/2
81
807 3
4
5 00
08
45 00
10
25 00
13
95 00
02
20 00
05
(CL)
70 00
00
35 00
13
30 00
28
35 00
00
20 00
03
45 00
04
65 00
25
60 00
(CL)
04
20 00
02
95 00
48
90 (CL) 00
02
30 00
05
65 00
02
15 00
00
65 00
13
25 00
15
60 00
04
45 00
02
85 00
06
35 00
09
40 00
12
10 00
11
60 00
10
00 00
09
50 00
18
70 00
00
55 00
03
80 00
07
75 00
20
45 00
01
85 00
00
60 00
00
30 00
24
35 00
(CL)
02
25 00
04
35 00
20
75 00
18
25 00
11
80 808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1
2
79/5
3 ) ANKAMPALEM (Contd .... )
50
4) RYALI
55/ 1A
55/1B
56/8
56/9
57/1B
57/3
57/2B
57/7B
57/8
57/10
63/1
63/6
63/8
63/11
63/12
63/15
63/13
63/14
69/1A
69/3B2
69/4
68/2
67/2
67/1
110/7
110/5
114/2A
114/4A
114/5A
111/12
111/13
111 /14A
111/15C
111/18A
112
99
96
95/5
199
200
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
5 3
4
50 00
08
00
05
45 (CL)
00
30
40
00
00
25 (CL)
00
00
55 00
03
65 00
02
50 00
06
75 00
00
05
09
00
85 00
07
00 00
08
60
90 00
07
00
30
04
00
70
04
85 00
08
00
07
00 00
00
50
30 00
02
00
90
04
00
45 00
(CL)
65
12
00
15
19
00
00
30
69
00
75
01
(CL)
80 00
00
(GL)
35 00
23
35
06
00
45 00
00
15
03
00
06
00
85
05 00
01
06
00
30 00
07
85
70 00
02
00
14
70 00
02
30 00
04
25 (CL)
00 00
54
70 00
09
00
15
10
04
55 (CL) 00
00
33
00 809
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1
2
202
4) RYALI ( Contd .... )
223/1B
223 /1A
223/2B
223/3
212/1B
222/1
212/2
212/3
212/4
211/16
211/17
211/18
210
314/3
314/4
314/5
312
313/2
316
317/1
317/2
318/2
325/4
325/3
325/9A
325/10A
326/2A2
327
328/3
328/4
345
346/4
344/1
344/3
344/2
344/4
344/5
344/6
342/3
343
383
5
4
3
00
00
15 00
18
70 00
01
25 (CL)
13
00
70 00
08
20
13
00 00
00
10
00
03
00
10 00
90
04
70 00
08
00
03
30 00
00
05 00
09
95
00
00
95
03
55 00
(CL)
00
10
60 00
04
75 00
00
10 00
58
05 00
03
55 00
03
95 (CL)
00
08
70 00
16
85 00
00
40
14
00
20 00
01
95 00
11
30 00
10
90 00
18
85 00
34
20 00
13
35 00
13
95
03
85 (CL) 00
00
01
25 00
30
09
00
02
40 00
05
00 00
11
30
05
00
70 00
10
60 00
15
45
07
05 (CL) 00
00
29
30 810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
1
2
384/1
4) RYALI ( Contd.... )
384/4
385/1
385/2
District : East Godavari Mandal : RAVULAPALEM
123
1 ) LAXMIPOLAVARAM
122
124/1
124/2
124/3
132/1
125/3
125/7
125/4
125/5
125/10
125/11
126/3
126/4
126/5
126/10
126/11
126/12
128/5
128/6
128/7
108/1
107/1
108/6
106/6
106/7
105/2
105/1
105/4
105/5
102/1
104/2
104/3
103
74/1
74/3
238
237/6
[PART II- SEC.3 ( ii )]
4
3
5 00
15
75 00
65
16
00
55
09
85
26
00
Andhra Pradesh State:
00
03
35 (GL)
00
06
45 00
21
30
07
75 00
00
14
75 00
00
25 00
05
30 00
08
95
10 00
06
00
03
55 00
03
90
06
00
55 00
25
02
40 00
04
00
07
25 00
05
30
08
65 00
00
15
01
05
65 00
06
00
65
75
21
00
00
09
05
65 00
08
15
10
00
55 00
09
90
09
00
00 00
24
30 00
00
15
00
00
65
14
00
75
26
00
11
00
95
50
19
00
03
60 00
(CL)
00
24
80
00
60
00
03
00
30 (GL)
00
45
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
1
2
237/7
1 ) LAXMIPOLAVARAM ( Contd .... )
237/8
237/10
237/11
237/12
237/13
240
241/1
241/2
241/3
242/6
242/5
243/1
2
+3/4
243/6
243/9
244/1
244/3
244/2
244/5
229/2
229/3
229/7
229/4
253/11
253/9
253/8
253/7
253/4
253/5
267
263
262
261/1A
285/2
287
2) VEDIRESWARAM
62/2
63/1
72/1
71/1
72/3
71/2
811 3
4
5 00
04
45 00
06
55 00
05
05 00
05
55 00
04
85 00
03
80 00
(CL)
01
95 00
04
55 00
12
60 00
00
95 00
09
15 00
17
75 00
11
30 00
02
30 00
12
55 00
08
30 00
22
00 00
10
20 00
07
85 00
00
35 00
23
25 00
17
05 00
03
45 00
05
60 00
01
00 00
26
25 00
00
40 00
05
95 00
05
35 00
06
25 00
09
65 00
03
(GL)
95 00
57
05 00
(CL)
02
90 00
08
40 00
32
95 00
(GL)
02
00 00
23
80 00
17
25 00
21
20 00
03
15 00
07
40 00
07
50 812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1
2
70/1 2) VEDIRESWARAM ( Contd .... )
70/2
70/3
70/5
70/6
80
78/6
79/1
79/4
79/5
79/3
81/1
82/1
82/2
82/3
109/1
109/3
109/4
109/5
134/1
134/7
134/5
134/6
134/9
133/4
104
103/2
106 3) KETARAJUPALLE
111/2
111/3
111/8
111/10
111/9
110/2
110/7
110/8
110/9
110/10
110/22
109/1
109/4
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3
4
5 00
08
85 00
00
05
15
05 00
00
04
00 (CL)
00
11
80
04
10 (CL) 00
00
01
55 00
70
08
10
00
90 00
08
95 00
00
75 00
42
80 00
03
50 00
15
11
00
12
95 00
04
55
00
40 00
00
16
40 00
07
60 00
10
80 00
11
10 00
40
02
00
13
50
18
00
10 00
90
04
(CL)
00
00
60 (CL)
00
60
08
00
20
06
(CL)
05 00
00
00
07
55 00
02
25 00
00
25 00
10
35 00
15
03
30 00
03
00
35
05
00
05
45
08
00
15 00
07
70 00
05
75 00
00
70 00
00
55 00
01
15 8.
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
3
2
1
50
05
00
109/5
3) KETARAJUPALLE (Contd.... )
45
00
00
109/6
80
13
00
108/8
55
19
00
151/4
4) DEVARAPALLE
40
10
00
151/3
25
01
00
(CL)
152
50
00
00
(GL)
153
70
06
00
139-1
50
04
00
140-1
05
00
00
140-2
45
27
00
141-1
05
21
00
141-2
10
00
08
140-5
60
14
00
(CL)
150
50
00
00
(GL)
17/3
[F. No. L -14014/46/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secу.
नई दिल्ली, 18 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 259.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) का धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क) के अनुसरण में और अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 779 तारीख 7 मार्च 2003 को जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग 2 , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड (ii) तारीख 8 मार्च 2003 में प्रकाशित को अधिकृत करते हुए नीचे दी गई सारणी के स्तंभ ( 1) में उल्लिखित व्यक्तियों को उक्स सारिणी के स्तंभ (2) में उल्लिखित क्षेत्रों की बाबत महाराष्ट्र राज्य में अवस्थित विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक वितरण के लिए गोवा के उत्तरी और दक्षिणी समुद्र तट और आन्ध्रप्रदेश की संरचनाओ में से मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ। स्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड (जी. टी.आई. सी. एल. ) द्वारा जिसका रजिस्ट्रीकत कार्यालय आर. पी . एल. हाउस , तीसरा तल 15 बालचंद हीराचंद मार्ग , बालार्ड इस्टेट , मुम्बई 400038 में है , उसकी संवर्धक कंपनी अर्थात मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के खोज ब्लाकों में उत्पादित प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारियों के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत करती है :
सारिणी
अधिकारिता के क्षेत्र
व्यक्तियों के नाम और पते
(2)
(1)
महाराष्ट्र राज्य के सिन्धदुर्ग, कोल्हापुर , शोलापुर और सांगली जिले और लातुर, बीड, धारशिव (पूर्वतर उस्मानाबाद) अहमदनगर, पुणे, सतारा, रायगढ़, रत्नागिरी और थाणे जिले ।
(1) श्री एस. डी. भिंसे, सेवानिवृत्त उपकलेक्टर, महाराष्ट्र राजस्व विभाग, महाराष्ट्र सरकार मार्फत मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसर्पोटेशन एण्ड इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी, आर. पी. एल. हाउरा , तीसरा तल 15 बालचंद हीराचंद गार्ग वालार्ड इस्टेट, मुम्बई -400038
महाराष्ट्र राज्य के सिन्धदुर्ग, कोल्हापुर, शोलापुर और सांगली जिले और लातुर, बीड, धारशिव (पूर्वतर उस्मानाबाद) अहमदनगर, पुणे, सतारा , रायगढ़ , रत्नागिरी और थाणे जिले ।
(2) श्री डी. एस. धोत्रे.. सेवानिवृत्त उपकलेक्टर, महाराष्ट्र राजस्व विभाग , महाराष्ट्र सरकार मार्फत मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसर्पोटेशन एण्ड इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी, आर. पी. एल. हाउस, तीसरा तल 15 वालचंद हीराचंद गार्ग बालार्ड इस्टेट, मुम्बई-400038
109 GI /2005-20 814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II - SEC. 3( ii) ] 1
3
महाराष्ट्र राज्य के लातुर बीड, उस्मानाबाद शोलापुर, अहमदनगर, पुणे, सतारा , रायगढ़ , रत्नागिरी और थाणे जिले ।
श्री वी जी काम्बले, सेवानिवृत्त उपकलेक्टर, महाराष्ट्र राजस्व विभाग , महाराष्ट्र सरकार मार्फत मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसर्पोटेशन एण्ड इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी , आर पी एल हाउस , तीसरा तल 15 वालचंद हीराचंद गार्ग बालार्ड इस्टेट, मुम्बई-400038
4
महाराष्ट्र राज्य के लातुर बीड, उस्मानाबाद, शोलापुर, अहमदनगर, पुणे, सतारा, रायगढ, रत्नागिरी और थाणे जिले ।
श्री एल आर गटारने, सेवानिवृत्त उपकलेक्टर महाराष्ट्र राजस्व विभाग, महाराष्ट्र सरकार मार्फत मैसर्स गैस ट्रांसर्पोटेशन एण्ड इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी , आर पी एल हाउस, तीसरा तल 15 वालचंद हीराचंद गार्ग बालार्ड इस्टेट, मुम्बई-400038
[फा. सं. एल-14014/9/2004-जी.पी. ] एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 18th January, 2005
S. O. 259
In pursuance of clause ( a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) and in supersession of notification number S.O. 779 , dated the 7th March , 2003 , published in the Gazette of India, Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) on the 8th March , 2003 , the Central Government hereby authorizes the persons mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Table below to perform the functions of the competent authority under the said Act for laying of the pipeline by M/ S Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited (GTICL) having its Registered Office at R.P.L. House , 3rd floor , 15 , Walchand Hirachand Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai- 400038 for transportation of natural gas produced in the exploration blocks of its promoter company, namely , M/ S Reliance Industries Limited in Northern and Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh for distribution to various consumers located in the State of Maharashtra in respect of the 's mentioned in column (2) of the said
Table:
Areas of jurisdiction
Name and Address of the persons
( 1)
(2)
Districts of Sindhudurg, Kolhapur, Solapur , Sangli and Districts of Latur , Beed, Dharashiv ( carlier Osmanabad ) ,Ahmednagar , Pune, Satara, Raigad , Ratnagiri and Thane of State of Maharashtra
1) Shri S.D.Bhise, Retired Deputy Collector of Maharashtra Revenue Department, Government ofMaharashtra, C/ o M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company , R.P.L. House, 3rd floor , 15, Walchand Hirachand Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai 400038 .
Districts of Sindhudurg, Kolhapur , Solapur , Sangli and Districts of Latur , Beed, Dharashiv (earlier Osmanabad ) ,Ahmednagar ,Pune , Satara, Raigad, Ratnagiri and Thane of State of Maharashtra
2) Shri D.S.Dhotre, Retired Deputy Collector of Maharashtra Revenue Department , Government ofMaharashtra , C/ o M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company , R.P.L. House , 3rd floor , 15. Walchand Ilirachand Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai -400038 .
Districts of Latur , Beed , Osmanabad, Solapur , Ahmednagar , Pune , Satara , Ratnagiri , Raigad and Thane of Maharashtra State .
3) Shri V.G.Kamble, Retired Deputy Collector of Revenue and Forests Department , Government of Maharashtra, C/ o M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company, R.P.L. House, 3rd floor , Mumbai -400038 .
Districts of Latur , Beed, Osmanabad, Solapur, Ahmednagar , Pune , Satara , Ratnagiri , Raigad and Thane of Maharashtra State .
4) Shri L.R.Gatarane , Retired Deputy Collector of Revenue and Forests Department , Government of Maharashtra, C/ o M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company , R.P.I.. House , 3rd floor, 15, Walchand Hirachand Marg, Ballard Estate , Mumbai -400038 .
[F. No. L - 14014/9/2004-G.P. ]
S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy .
815
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 19 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 260.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधिन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1647 तारीख 9 जून , 2003, व्दारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मेसर्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओ से गोवा राज्य में उत्तरी गोवा जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रान्सर्पोटेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड व्दारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 2 जुलाई , 2003 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी व्दारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) व्दारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गैस ट्रान्सर्पोटेशन एंड इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसुची 6(1 )
राज्य: गोवा
जिल्हा : उत्तर गोवा
तालुका - फोंडा
अजित पजित गरने के लिए क्षेत्रफल
सबडिविजन नं. आर आ यू
क्र. नं.
गांव का नाम
स्वेंनंबर
स्क्केमी.
ऐर
हेक्टर
6
7
5
2
3
4
1
48
00
0
201
23
1
48
0
00
23
05
2
0
भोमा
48
2
30
0
03
48
3
08
53
0
10
0
73
05
38
3
बडकोण।
47
01
14
21
0
0
06
57
12
00
4
0
116
10
50
0
111
11
70
0
30
123
09
90
29
0
123
0
22
32
फा एल-14014/5 /20
एस. बी. मण्डल , अभिव 816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 19th January , 2005
S. O. 260. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1647 dated 09th June , 2003 , issued under sub- section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962)( hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and structures in Andhra Pradesh ofM/s. Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/s . Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to various consumers of District North Goa in the State of Goa by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public from 02nd July 2003 ;
And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;
And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired, for laying the pipeline ;
And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest, on this date of publication of the declaration , in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE - 6(1 )
Taluka - Ponda
District- North Goa
State- Goa SI . No
Hissa No.
quirent q VillageName
Survey No.
Centiare
Hectare Are
6
2
3
1
5
7
4
1
201
0
48 Cundaim
23
00
0
00
48 Bhoma
2
0
2
48
05
23
48
3
0
03
30
0
08
53 817 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6
2
7 1
4
5
3
10
05
0
38
73
3
Adcolna
0
01
21
47
14
0
06
57
0
4
00
12
116
Candola
50
0
10
111
11
0
30
70
123
0
90
09
123
29
32
22
0
[F. No. L-14014/51/200G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 261.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाएँ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , 16 , कृष्णा विहार , नारायण निवास के पास , गोपालपुरा बाईपास रोड़ , जयपुर 302018 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
2
3
5
6 1
2565/1
1. रहलाना
2565/2
2565/3
0
94
05
2565/4
2565/5
2565/6
2565/7
2564/1 (स.भूमि)
0
73
04
2564/2
2563/1
2563/3
46
0
62
2563/4
2563/2
19
0
62
2562(स.चारागाह)
0
06
75
2576(स.चारागाह)
77
49
0
2438(स.चारागाह)
0
06
38
2389 (स. चारागाह)
2231/1
0
81
36
2231/2
2233/1/1
0
02
64
2233/1/2
2233/2
2248/1
2248/2
0
77
98
2248/3
2248/4
0
17
37
2243
03
0
09
2021
04
0
44
2017
0
90
31
176
0
04
96
175(स.नाला)
05
0
08
2015 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
819
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
3 1
45
2 रहलाना (जारी...)
1.
46
47/1 (स.भूमि)
47/2
48/1
48/2
174/1
174/2
174/3(स.नाला)
56
168/1 (स.भूमि)
168/2
168/2/1
168/2/2
168/2/3
167
166
164
163
155
159
156
151
152
384
150
385
372
369/1
369/2
369/2/1
387/1
387/2
387/3(स. रास्ता)
388
388/1 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6
04 0
33
0
26
64 0
34
12 0
62
19
0
0
23
30 0
19
32 0
02
70 0
00
82 0
08
69 0
00
20 0
09
87 0
01
49 0
03
36 0
14
18 0
01
85 0
05
98 0
09
59 0
01
20 0
06
66 0
07
74 0
02
16 0
09
12 0
04
20
जारी...4 820
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
राज्य : राजस्थान तहसील : मौजमाबाद
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
5
6 2
3
4
1
41
0
01
389
1. रहलाना (जारी...)
0
10
82
390
0
00
64
391
0
01
40
393
0
46
392
16
25
56
0
2. बेनीखेडा
2437(स.चारागाह)
63
0
63
2390 (स. चारागाह )
0
74
34
2435
0
82
2392
44
41
0
04
2396
0
03
60
2397
0
01
26
2403
0
03
75
2363
0
07
56
2375
02
0
52
2376
0
61
21
2374
0
00
42
2373
27
0
17
2372
96
0
12
2371
0
00
90
2370
0
00
61
2367
2364/1
00
20
0
2364/2
0
38
28
2366
2365/1
12
0
01
2365/2
2365/3
80
01
2325
0
05
40
0
2324
0
00
12
2323
79
01
0
2321
00
96
0
2228
0
12
96
2229
2230/1
0
12
06
2230/2
2250/2
64
0
45
2250/1 87
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम
क्षेत्रफल सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
1
2
3
4
5
6
79
411
0
06
3. केरियाबुजुर्ग
0
01
14
413
414
0
00
29
0
00
66
415
0
417
08
69
00
0
20
419
420/1
0
24
58
420/2
{
425
0
06
30
426
0
11
89
427
0
04
27
426/693
0
03
41
432
0
07
50
433/1 (स .खरडा)
433/1/748
0
13
02
433/2
433/3
433/4
0
08
08
353(स.नाला)
0
17
15
352(स.आबादी)
0
02
95
351 (स. रास्ता)
466/1 (स .खरडा)
466/1262
466/1/749
0
67
466/1/754
12
466/1/751
466/750
466/2
C
17
15
349(स.खरडा)
39
348
0
05
0
03
347
14
21
40
0
345(स.आबादी)
04
0
42
467 (स.खरडा)
109 GI/2005-21 [PART 11-SBC. 3( ii) ) 822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
राजस्थान
राज्य
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
जिला: जयपुर
क्रम
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं.
सं.
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
4
6
5
1
2
3
0
02
46
544(स.रास्ता)
3. केरियाबुजुर्ग (जारी ...)
543/733
0
07
57
543/1 (स.खरडा)
539/1
0
57
13
539/2(स .चारागाह)
629/1
629/2
0
51
35
629/3
629/4
0
49
00
538
03
631
0
41
634
0
11
72
635
0
00
40
0
632
76
37
0
06
654
651
0
12
84
0
664
11
49
667
0
65
03
668
0
12
01
675
0
06
95
674
0
17
71
0
673
00
20
672
0
00
20 4. गेगा
139/448
139/449/1
139/449/2
0
10
66
139/449/3
139/449/4
139/1
138/1
0
58
138/2
68
138/3
136
0
13
15
135
18
09
0
02
35
114(स. रास्ता)
130
0
00
40
102
0
22
00
102/447 {
103
0
71
30 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
823
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
2
1
3
41 4. गेगा (जारी..)
40
39
111
38
37
21
20
19 5. हरसोली
1527/1
1527/2/1
1527/2/2
1523
1522 क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
6
5
0
16
48
77 0
14
0
08
45 0
04
07
12
32 0
0
00
20
28
08 0
29
88 0
80
26
0
02
19
0
08
72 0
15
31
0
03
02
1520(स .रास्ता)
0
02
25
1519(स.रास्ता)
1517
1517/2467 0
36
77 0
48
11
1515/1 (स.टिबा)
1515/2
1.1
01
14
0
61
1515/2343
1515/2342
1513
1509
1506
1508
1504
1503
1501
1497/1/1
1497/1/2
1497/2
1497/3
1497/4 0
61
14
11
29 0
26
44 0
0
15
32
39 0
00
0
52
03
73 0
11
87 0
08
26 0
05 824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
राज्य : राजस्थान तहसील : मौजमाबाद
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं.
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
1
2
4
5
6
3
09
16
1498
हरसोली (जारी...)
5.
1494/7
0
39
27
23
1494/5
25
0
0
44
25
1494/1327
52/3
52/2
52/1/1
47
()
31
52/1/2
52/1/3
52/1/4
53/1
27
0
06
53/2
53/3
54/5/1
54/5/2
54/5/3
54/5/4
54/6/1
54/6/2
78
0
24
54/6/3
54/6/4
54/1
54/2
54/3
54/4
03
00
6(स.रास्ता)
04
97
5/2278 (स. चारागाह)
50
55(स.पाल)
58/1
34
8
58/2
11
18
59
0
08
49
60
06
70
0
29 825
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/ माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
खसरा सं .
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
3 1
2
69 हरसोली (जारी...)
5.
68
73
83
82
85
81/1
81/2
80/1
80/2
79/1
79/2
79/3
79/4
79/2302
79/2301
79/2303
126
123/2307
123/2308
123/2306
113
120. क्षेत्रफल
एयर
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर 4
6
5
0
05
02 0
55
16
0
20
00
0
05
84 0
00
69 0
22
53 0
11
08
40
05
0
29
30 0
02
41 0
15
41 0
36
16
0-
05
44 0
08
34 0
05
58 0
05
47 0
66
08
0
09
60 0
01
19
150 (स.रास्ता)
153
152/2
152/1
151 0
06
20 0
90
75 0
59
09
0
91
01
158(स. रास्ता)
159/1
159/2
159/3
159/4 0
17
55
0
00
27
320(स. चारागाह)
6. गोपीपुरा
0
96
39
326(स.चारागाह)
826
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला: जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं .
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1
3
2
4
6
5
328
0
06
84 6. गोपीपुरा (जारी... )
0
329
14
04
0
330
07
06
0
336
34
20
335
0
02
23
0
00
72
337(स. रास्ता)
338
20
16
339
0
00
34
340
0
02
88 7. श्रीरामनगर
129/1
0
02
93
129/2
130/1
40
0
82
130/2
140
0
06
88
139/144
0
33
84
139/144/1
46/1
0
11
60
46/2(स. चारागाह)
14
Q
40
87 8. चरासड़ा
13
0
13
98
15
0
33
47
12
0
03
33
16
0
10
06
19
0
03
08
20
0
27
59
0
27
13
07
22
0
21
51
24
0
26
00
0
04
44
53
0
34
04
1 (स.नाला)
0
18
09
9. भोजपुर
377(स. नाला)
247
0
26
16
246
0
13
44
0
245
01
85
0
248
15
21 827
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
क्रम सं.
3
2
1
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
53 0
01
235(स. रास्ता)
भोजपुर (जारी ... )
9.
234/1 (स .चारागाह)
234/2
234/3
234/4
327
332 0
40
77 0
07
53
10 0
02
0
80
10
327/585
330 0
01
32 0
330/565
329
339
231
06
85 0
72
09
0
01
18
0
01
48 0
00
95
340 (स.कुँआ)
341
342
350
352 0
02
71
26
0
18 0
00
81 0
08
79 0
02
25
225(स.रास्ता)
209/1 (स.चारागाह)
209/2 0
82
44 0
01
92
475(स.तलई)
0
03
69
476(स.पाल)
477/574/1
477/574/2
477/1/1
477/1/2
477/2
483/1
483/2
484/576
484/577
494/596
494/598 0
44
10
0
43
20 0
41
94 0
09
00 0
62
10
0
03
69
493(स.नाला)
488
489
4205 10. दूदू
4206 0
02
21 0
29
17 0
02
22 0
01
92 828
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II -SEC. 3(ii )] तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं.
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
6
4
3
5
1
2
0
4213
24
05
दूदू (जारी... )
10.
0
4214
52
01
0
4211
20
00
0
4218
07
10
0
20
00
4219(स.खरडा)
0
4223
60
03
0
4222
40
05
0
4228
10
08
0
4269
42
12
0
4268
84
15
0
4292
12
06
0
4290
49
14
0
4291
85
00
0
4281
05
10
4283
Q
10
89
0
4526
34
93
0
4525
62
00
4515/1
0
00
78
4515/2
0
4524
14
07
0
4523
34
11
4522/1
0
34
20
4522/2
0
4534
79
00
0
4533
07
85
0
69
39
4536 (स.चारागाह)
0
00
4537
96
0
4538
94
17
0
84
4539
06
0
10
80
4546 (स.चारागाह)
06
39
4545(स.चारागाह)
१
0
11
4542
01
0
4544
80
32
0
42
4476
03
0
01
08
4663(स.रास्ता)
829 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
तहसील मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
2
1
3
4
6
5
4664/2
10. दूदू (जारी ...)
4664/1/1
4664/1/2
4664/1/3
4664/1/4
4664/1/5
0
32
58
4664/1/6
4664/2/1
4664/2/2
4664/3/1
4664/3/2
4664
0
01
44
4952(स.पटरी)
0
72
4951 (स .सड़क)
00
0
02
16
4950 (स.पटरी)
0
4668
18
94
0
4669
04
82
0
4681
17
28
0
4685
00
20
0
4680
08
10
4703/1
0
15
30
4703/2
4704
0
48
06
0
4942
12
38
0
4941
17
46
4939/1/1
4939/1/2
0
13
44
4939/1/3
4939/2
0
4710
01
11
4935/1
0
22
10
4935/2
0
4934
66
96
4931/1/1/2
0
4931/1/1/1
18
78
4931/2
109 GI/2005-22 830
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
3
2
4932 10. दूदू (जारी ...)
4929/1 क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5
6 0
02
79 0
02
07
4929/2(स.सड़क)
4929/3
4930
4925/1 0
32
04 0
14
04 0
04
05
4925/2 (स.रास्ता)
4925/3 0
20
47 0
02
492(स.रास्ता)
4898
4901
4899/1
88 0
72
09
0
09
81
4899/2
4899/3 0
45
52
4899/4
4900
1097
244 11. बागेत
243
241
240
223
238/1
238/2
237
236
234
235
233
232 0
40
65 0
00
82 0
82
13
0
15
52 0
19
08 0
11
05
87 0
04
0
10
26
}
00
0
40 0
16
95
16
0
47
00
20 0
0
01
11 0
72
18
0
32
04
215 (स.रास्ता)
280
290
291
289/1
289/2
20 0
00
0
26
14 0
17
10 0
03
75 831
भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम
सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
2
3 1
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
6
292/1/1
11. बागेत (जारी...)
292/1/2
292/1/3
292/2
293/1
293/2
293/3
294/1
294/2
301
300
302/1
302/2
302/3
302/4
302/5
302/6
303/1
303/2
304/1
304/2 0
21
99 0
44
10
20
00
0
20 0
00
51 0
15
27
68 0
0
17
20
18 0
09
10
0
89
311 (स. रास्ता)
323
322
321
324
320
325
328
326
327
330
331
332
335
32
04
0
0
37
08
53
00
0
04
34 0
60
02
0
45
02
0
20
00
0
71
01
0
63
29
0
20
00
0
66
11
0
20
00
0
64
17
0 832
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
336 11. बागेत (जारी ...)
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
5
6 4
0
89
01
0
13
05
337(स.रास्ता)
346/1
346/2
346/3
345
344
414
413
412 0
31
00
84
15
0
68
04
0
74
15
0
02
39 0
20 0
00
05
04
0
410 (स.रास्ता)
416
527/1
527/2
527/3
526
525
524/1
524/2
533
502
497
495
494
493
488
489
63 0
09
29 0
07
31
05
0
04
14
0
44
10
0
0
49
11
0
80
08
0
33
19
0
89
22
0
65
11
0
20
00
0
36
17
0
08
17
77
13
0
55(स .चारागाह)
12. गुढासायपुरा
54/1
53/493
53/2
53/3
53/4
72
09
0
02
04
0
20
00
0
80
10
0
76
08
0
96
00
0
51/499/4
53/5
79
00
0 833
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
जिला : जयपुर क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
2
1
3
51/499/9 12. गुमसायपुरा (जारी...)
51/499/8
51/499/7
51/1/2/5
51/1/2/6
51/1/2/4
51/1/2/3
51/1/2/2
51/1/2/1
51
45/1
45/2
45/3
50
49
44
43/489
43
33
34
8/1 13. चकमहेशपुरा
8/2
7
6
1/1 (स.चारागाह)
1/1/3
1/2
1/3
2
3/1/2
20 (सिं.वि.नहर)
21
428 14. चाँदरमूल
420
421 राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
6 4
5
0
03
31
11
0
88
79
01
0
01
35 0
03
0
11
34
11
0
81
09
0
62
10
0
07
45 0
20 0
00
77
23 0
02
68 0
08
01
0
10
22
0
30
14
0
12
15
0
47
13
0
20
00
0
81
53
0
16
33
0
47
06
0
29
13
0
22
14
0
20
88 0
51
16
0
52
29
0
48
18
0
62
01
0
08
10
0
74 0
09
50
03
0
02
20
0 834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
1
3
426
2 14. चाँदरमूल (जारी...)
425
432
433
441
436
437 क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6 4
5
0
31
91 0
02
08 0
24
16
52
07
0
0
50
28
0
12
16
10 0
32
334/1/1
334/1/2
334/2
334/3
334/456/1
89 0
05
334/456/2/1 (स.भूमि)
334/456/2
334/453
418 0
02
42
0
27
00
416(स.रास्ता)
415
18 15. महेशपुरा
0
00
20 0
02
02
76 0
01
17 (स.रास्ता)
15/2
15/1
13
16 0
40
14
0
07
48 0
78
13
20 0
19
82 0
09
73(स.चारागाह)
74
80
77
78
79
83
326
327
328
312 0
52
25
0
20
15
0
04
90
08
75 0
0
08
64
92 0
01
80
26
0
36
02
0
0
07
30
38 0
08 835
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1
2
3
166/1 15. महेशपुरा (जारी... )
166/2
167/1
167/2
168
165
163
163/1
163/2
55 16. मानपुरा
11
12
10
16
17
21/1
21/2
21/3
19
19/1
19/2
20/1
20/2
23/1
23/2
30
25/1
25/2
26/1
26/2
37 क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
6 4
5
0
05
80 0
00
60
60 0
01
40 0
13
40 0
18
75 0
03
62
12
0
70
00
0
0
19
50 0
00
20 0
10
49 0
10
81
67 0
05
07
70 0
52 0
09
0
01
85 0
00
05
0
27
89
20 0
00
1404/1/1
17. अखैपुरा
1404/1/2
0
69
83
1404/2
1404/3
1404/4
836
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
गाँव का नाम
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
3
4
2
5
6 1
1403/1
17. अखैपुरा (जरी...)
0
09
37
1403/2
1403/3
691/1/4
691/1/2
0
50
70
691/1/3
691/1
691/2
1402/1
0
78
45
1402/2
0
11
33
1401 (स . चारागाह)
1394/1
25
0
27
1394/2
1394/3
20
00
0
1392
13
0
09
1393
17
0
09
1390
46
0
01
1414(स. रास्ता)
1144/1 (स.भूमि)
0
10
03
1144/2 (स.आबादी)
93
18
0
1128
08
48
0
1140
14
75
0
1136
20
0
00
1129
0
03
15
1135
01
71
0
1133
72
0
06
1134
10
0
16
1100
27
03
0
1098
41
04
0
1101
32
06
0
1097
94
0
10
1080
55
51
0
1079
01
35
0
1076(स. रास्ता)
70
0
02
1075 37
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम
सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
1069 17. अखेपुरा (जरी...)
1065 क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4
6
5
0
03
09 0
09
01 0
92
01
1064(स.रास्ता)
1063 0
16
98 0
38
38
9(स.चारागाह)
18. गंगातीखुर्द
0
01
58
8(स.रास्ता)
0
07
40
7(स.चारागाह)
0
97
01
17(स.नाला)
0
28
52
30 (स.चारागाह)
0
01
57
29(स.रास्ता)
0
69
31
18.(स . चारागाह)
24
19
20
21/1
21/2
25
00
0
0
16
93 0
18
34 0
03
38
77
00
0
110 (स .रास्ता)
141/1
141/2
141/3
141/4
946 19. गंगातीकलों
945
952
953
954
955
956
951
972
968
969
970 109 GI/2005-23
0
03
45
87 0
08
01
40
76 0
05
0
07
94
24 0
00
0
00
20 0
00
32
79 0
01
0
89
01
0
05
67
04
05
0
0
64
08 838
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं.
क्रम सं.
3 1
2
1005 19. गंगातीकला (जारी...)
1006
1007
966
1008
1004
1009
1011
1012
1010
994
993
992/1
992/2
1018
991
1022
1021
1020
1029 क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 4
6
5
0
00
48 0
02
40 0
01
92 0
20
01
0
07
02
20 0
00
0
53
01
54 0
05
0
30
00
0
63
03
0
92
01
02
0
25
16
11
0
02
79 0
00
20 0
23 0
03
63 0
18
07
29 0
0
59
13
00
20 0
(स. रास्ता)
30
42
0
898 (स.चारागाह)
858
897
895 0
05
04
37
06
0
45
12
0
61 0
02
893(सिं.वि.माली)
892
891/1
891/2
1075/1155
1075
1074
1073
32
04 0
0
08
37
48
15
0
23
40 0
0
08
19
0
59
04
0
03
78
1071 (स.टिबा)
839
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/ माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम
सं.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
3
1072 1 2 19: गंगातीकलाँ (जारी...)
1064
1083/1
1083/2 क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर
6
5
4
0
29
88 0
32
00
03 Q
06
0
87
03
1088 (सिं.वि. महर)
1110/1 0
12
60
1110/2
1109
1105
1104
1106
1101
1102
1100
130 20. खटवाड़
0
60
21
33
0
21
20 0
00
0
00
68 0
31
82 0
01
71 0
11
16 0
00
20 0
130/1215
105
129
106
107
110
109
112
115
116
97/1207
97
24
50 0
46
39 0
03
93 0
11
67 0
09
59
27
0
76 0
04
25 0
14
63 0
14
68 0
04
88 0
23
82
86 0
16
0
02
10
139 (सिं.वि.नहर)
172
177
176
182 0
90
19
0
17
16
0
02
43
17
40 840
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्षेत्रफल
गाँव का नाम
क्रम सं.
खसरा सं.
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
2
4
5
6 1
3
18
0
26
179
20. खटवाड़ (जारी...)
18
0
37
183
66
05
0
198
0
01
17
196(स.रास्ता)
0
02
54
195
0
37
14
194
52
0
36
193
0
05
66
462(स.चारागाह)
0
04
46
412/1268
0
03
05
462/1270
0
24
50
462/1269
0
06
14
462/1273
0
15
23
465/1265
0
06
28
455(स.चारागाह)
0
27
02
463(स.चारागाह)
678/1
0
29
48
678/2
678/1313
0
93
09
681/1
0
02
40
681/2
677/1
0
90
677/2
10
677/3
673
0
00
20
673/1
0
05
674
89
0
00
667
20
0
666
10
93
656/1
0
16
22
656/2
656/3
0
657
07
95 841
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
तहसील : मौजमाबाद
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिला : जयपुर
क्रम
गाँव का नाम
सं.
खसरा सं.
3 1
658
2 20. खटवाड़ (जारी...)
642/2 क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
5
6 4
0
21
01
642/1/1 (स.खरडा)
642/1/2
642/1/3
642/1/4
642/1/5
642/1/6
642/1/7
642/1307 0
68
48
642/1308
642/1309
642/1310
627
641/1
641/2
640
604
73
01
.0
0
03
93 0
14
85 0
02
40 0
67
01
708(स .रास्ता)
0
20
00
709(स.खरडा)
714
713
717/1362
13
0
15
04
0
43 0
16
68
02
0
16
718(स.सुतीया)
735/1
737
738
761
760
739
756
752 0
17
83
04
0
08 0
05
06 0
18
17
0
00
20 0
23
47
09 0
10
0
49
05 842
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील : मौजमाबाद
जिला : जयपुर
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
क्रम स.
गाँव का नाम
खसरा सं .
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1
2
3
4
5
6
753
20. खटवाड़ (जारी...)
0
15
67
750/1
0
56
58
750/2
[ फा. सं. आर-31015/72/2004-ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 20th January, 2005
S. O. 261.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority , Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , 16 Krishna Vihar, Near Narayan Niwas , Gopalpura Bye- pass Road , Jaipur- 302018 ( Rajasthan ) .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
843
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
SCHEDULE
District : JAIPUR Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
2565/1 1. RAHALANA
2565/2
2565/3
2565/4
2565/5
2565/6
2565/7
2564/1 (G/L)
2564/2
2563/1
2563/3
2563/4
2563/2
2562(G / L Pasture)
2576(G /L Pasture)
2438 (G /L Pasture)
2389 (G / L Pasture)
2231/1
2231/2
2233/1/1
2233/1/2
2233/2
2248/1
2248/2
2248/3
2248/4
2243
2021
2017
176
175(G/L Nala)
2015 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
6
5
0
05
94 0
04
73 0
62
46 0
62
19 0
75
06 0
77
49
0
38
06 0
36
81 0
02
64 0
77
98 0
17
37 0
09
03 0
44
04
0
31
90 0
04
96 0
05
08 844
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
45 1. RAHALANA ( Contd ... )
46 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
33
04 0
26
64
47/1(G/L)
47/2
48/1
48/2
174/1
174/2
34
12 }.。
0
19
62 0
0
30
23
174/3 (G /L Nala)
56 0
19
32
168/1(G/L)
168/2
168/2/1 0
70
02
168/2/2
168/2/3
167
166
164
163
155
159
156
151
152
384
150
385
372
369/1
369/2 0
00
82 0
08
69 0
00
20 0
87
09
0
01
49 0
03
36 0
14
18
01
0
85 0
05
98 0
59
09
01
20 0
0
06
66 0
07
74 0
16
02
369/2/1
387/1
387/2
12 0
09
387/3(G/L Cart Track)
388
388/1 0
20
04 $15
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
No.
KhasaraNo.
Name of the Village
2
1
3
389 1. RAHALANA ( Contd ... )
390
391
393
392 2. BENIKHEDA
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
6
5
0
01
41 0
10
82 0
64
00
0
40
01
0
16
46 0
56
25
2437(G/L Pasture)
0
63
63
2390(G/L Pasture)
2435
2392
2396
2397
2403
2363
2375
2376
2374
2373
2372
2371
2370
2367
2364/1
2364/2
2366
2365/1
2365/2
2365/3
2325
2324
2323
2321
2228
2229
2230/1
2230/2
2250/2
2250/1 109 GI/2005-24
0
74
34
82 0
44
0
41
04
0
03
60 0
01
26 0
03
75 0
07
56 0
02
52 0
21
61 0
00
42 0
17
27 0
12
96 0
00
90 0
00
61
00
20 。
}
0
28
38 0
01
12 0
01
80 0
40
05
0
12
00 0
01
79 0
00
96 0
12
96 0
12
06 0
45
64 846
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC , 3 ( ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Sr. No.
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
3
4
6 1
5
2
0
79 3. KERIYABUJURG
411
06
413
0
01
14
0
00
29
414
0
00
66
415
417
0
08
69
00
0
20
419
420/1
24
58
420/2
} 。
0
06
425
30
0
11
426
89
0
27
427
04
0
03
41
426/693
432
0
07
50
433/1 (G /L Kharda)
433/1/748
433/2
0
02
13
433/3
433/4
0
08
08
353 (G /L Nala)
0
17
15
352(G/L Abadi )
0
02
95
351 (G /L Cart Track)
466/1 (G / L Kharda)
466/1262
466/1/749
0
12
67
466/1/754
466/1/751
466/750
466/2
0
17
15
349(G/L Kharda)
348
0
05
39
0
03
347
14
0
21
40
345(G/L Abadi )
0
42
04
467(G/L Kharda)
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
847
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No.
KhasaraNo.
Name of the Village
1
2
3 State: RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
0
02
46
544(G/L CartTrack)
3. KERIYABUJURG ( Contd ... )
543/733
0
07
57
543/1 (G/L Kharda)
539/1 0
13
57
539/2(G/L Pasture)
629/1
629/2
629/3
629/4
538
631
634
635
632
654
651
664
667
668
675
674
673
672
51 0
35
0
49
00
41 0
03
72 0
11
40
00
0
76 0
01
06
37 0
0
84
12
0
11
49
65 0
03
01
12
0
06
95 0
71 0
17
00
20 0
20 0
00
139/448
4. GEGA
139/449/1
139/449/2
66
10
0
139/449/3
139/449/4
139/1
138/1
138/2
138/3
136
135
68 0
58
15 0
13
0
18
09
02
35 0
114(G/L Cart Track)
130
102
40 0
00
00
22
102/447
103 。
}
71
30 848
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr No
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 4
41 GEGA ( Contd ... )
40
39
111
38
37
21
20
19
1527/1 5. HARSOLI
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
16
48 0
14
77 0
45
08
0
04
07 0
12
32 0
00
20 0
28
08 0
29
88
26
0
80
02
1527/2/1
0
19
1527/2/2
1523
1522 0
72
08
0
31
15 0
03
02
1520(G/L Cart Track)
0
02
25
1519(G/ L Cart Track)
1517 0
36
77
11
0
48
1517/2467
1515/1(G/L Tiba)
1515/2
01
11
0
61
14
0
1515/2343
14
0
61
1515/2342
1513
1509
1506
1508
1504
1503
1501 0
11
29 0
26
44
32
15 C
00
39 0
52
03
9
73
11
37
08
1497/1/1
1497/1/2
1497/2
1497/3
1497/4 0
26
05 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
District : JAIPUR Tehsii : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
3
2
1498 5. HARSOLI ( Contd ... )
1494/7
1494/5
1494/1327
52/3
52/2
52/1/1
52/1/2
52/1/3
52/1/4
53/1
53/2
53/3
54/5/1
54/5/2
54/5/3
54/5/4
54/6/1
54/6/2
54/6/3
54/6/4
54/1
54/2
54/3
54/4
6(G/L Cart Track)
5/2278 ( G/ L Pasture)
55(G/L Pal)
58/1
58/2
59
60
70
849 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
16
09
0
39
27
23 0
25
25
0
44
47 0
31
27 0
06
0
24
78
00 0
03
97 0
04
50 0
01
34
18
0
18
11
0
0
49
08
06
29 0 850
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
District : JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No.
Hectare Are
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
1
3
4
5
6 2
0
02
69
05
5. HARSOLI ( Contd ... )
0
16
68
55
0
00
20
73
0
84
05
83
69
00
0
82
22
53
0
85
81/1
11
08
0
81/2
80/1
05
40
0
80/2
79/1
79/2
30
0
29
79/3
79/4
02
41
0
79/2302
41
0
15
79/2301
36
16
0
79/2303
44
05
0
126
34
08
0
123/2307
05
58
0
123/2308
47
05
0
123/2306
66
08
0
113
60
09
120
0
01
19
0
150(G /L Cart Track)
20
06
0
153
152/2
75
90
0
152/1
59
09
0
151
01
91
0
158 (G/ L Cart Track)
159/1
159/2
17
0
55
159/3
159/4
00
27
0
6. GOPIPURA
320(G/L Pasture)
0
39
96
326 (G /L Pasture)
851
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
328 6. GOPIPURA ( Contd ... )
329
330
336
335
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr 4
6
5
0
06
84 0
14
04 0
07
06 0
34
20 0
02
23 0
00
72
337(G/L Cart Track)
338
339
340
129/1 7. SHRIRAMNAGAR
129/2
130/1
130/2
140 0
20
16 0
34
00 0
02
88 0
02
93 0
82
40
0
06
88
139/144
33
0
84
139/144/1
46/1 0
11
60
46/2(G /L Pasture)
14 8. CHARASARA
13
15
12
16
19
20
27
22
24
53 0
40
87 0
13
98 0
33
47
03
0
33 0
10
06 0
03
08 0
27
59 0
13
07
21
0
51 0
00
26 0
04
44 0
34
04
1(G/L Nala)
9. BHOJPUR
0
09
18
377(G/L Nala)
247
246
245
248
16
0
26 0
13
44 0
01
85 0
21
15 852
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3
2
1
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
5
6 4
0
01
53
235(G/L Cart Track)
9. BHOJPUR ( Contd ... )
234/1 (G/L Pasture)
234/2
234/3
234/4
327
332
40
77 0
53
07
0
02
10 0
80 0
10
327/585
330
32
01
0
06
85 0
330/565
329
339
231
72
09
0
18
01 0
48
01
0
95 0
00
340(G/L Well)
341
342
350
352
71
02
0
18
26
0
81
00
0
79
08
0
25
02
0
225(G/ L Cart Track)
209/1 (G/L Pasture)
209/2
44 0
82
01
92 0
475(G/L Talai )
69
03
0
476(G/L Pal)
477/574/1
477/574/2
477/1/1
10
44 0
477/1/2
477/2
483/1
483/2
20
43
0
484/576
94
41
0
484/577
00
09
0
494/596
62
10
0
494/598
69
03
0
493(G/L Nala)
488
489
4205 10. DUDU
4206
21
02
0
17
29
0
22
02
0
92 0
01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
853
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/ माघ 2,1926
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil: MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
4213 10. DUDU ( Contd .. )
4214
4211
4218
من
4219(G/L Kharda)
4223
4222
4228
4269
4268
4292
4290
4291
4281
4283
4526
4585
4515/1
4515/2
4524
4523
4522/1
4522/2
4534
4533
4536(G/L Pasture)
4537
4538
4539
4546(G/L Pasture)
4545 (G/L Pasture)
4542
4544
4476
4663(G/L Cart Track)
109 Gl /2005-25
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
6 4
5
0
24
05
0
01
52 0
00
20 0
10
07
0
00
20 0
60
03
0
40
05
10
0
08
12
42 0
0
84
15
12
06
0
49
14
0
00
0
85
10
05 0
10
0
89
34
93 0
62
00
0
。
00
78 }
07
14 0
34
11
0
34 0
20
}
00
79 0
85
07
0
69
39
0
0
96
00
17
94 0
0
84
06
80
10
0
06
39 0
11
01
0
32
80 0
42
03
0
08
01
0 854
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Area
Sr. No.
Hectare Are
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Name of the Village
2
3
4
1
5
6
4664/2
10. DUDU ( Contd .. )
4664/1/1
4664/1/2
4664/1/3
4664/1/4
4664/1/5
0
32
58
4664/1/6
4664/2/1
4664/2/2
4664/3/1
4664/3/2
4664
0
01
44
4952(G/L Patri)
0
72
00
4951(G/L Road)
0
02
16
4950(G/L Patri)
4668
0
18
94
0
82
04
4669
0
4681
17
28
4685
0
00
20
4680
0
10
08
4703/1
0
15
30
4703/2
0
4704
06
48
0
12
4942
38
4941
0
17
46
4939/1/1
4939/1/2
0
13
44
4939/1/3
4939/2
01
4710
0
11
4935/1
0
22
10
4935/2
0
4934
66
96
4931/1/1/2
0
18
78
4931/1/1/1
4931/2 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
855
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
District : JAIPUR Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
3 1
2
4932 10. DUDU ( Contd .. )
4929/1
4929/2(G/L Road)
4929/3
4930
4925/1
4925/2(G/L Cart Track)
4925/3
492(G /L Cart Track)
4898
4901
4899/1
4899/2
4899/3
4899/4
4900
1097
244 11. BAGET
243
241
240
223
238/1
238/2
237
236
234
235
233
232
215(G /L Cart Track)
280
290
291
289/1
289/2 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
0
02
79
07 0
02
0
32
04 0
14
04 0
05
04
47 0
20
0
02
88
72 0
09
81 0
09
0
52
45 0
40
65
00
0
82 0
82
13
0
52
15
0
08
19
05 0
11
0
87
04
26
10 } 。
0
40
00
16
0
95 0
16
47
00
20 0
11
01
0
18
72 0
04
32 0
0
00
20 0
26
14
17
0
10
75
03 856
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
District : JAIPUR
Area
Sr. No.
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
6 1
2
3
4
5
292/1/1
11. BAGET ( Contd ... )
292/1/2
0
21
99
292/1/3
292/2
293/1
0
10
44
293/2
293/3
294/1
0
20
00
294/2
00
301
0
20
300
0
15
51
302/1
302/2
302/3
0
27
68
302/4
302/5
302/6
303/1
0
17
20
303/2
304/1
0
09
18
304/2
0
10
89
311(G / L Cart Track)
323
0
04
32
322
0
08
37
321
0
00
53
324
0
04
34
320
0
02
60
325
0
02
45
328
0
00
20
326
0
01
71
327
0
29
63
330
0
00
20
331
11
66
0
332
0
20
00
335
0
17
64 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
857
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
336 11. BAGET ( Contd ...)
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
0
01
89 0
05
13
337(G/L Cart Track)
346/1
346/2
346/3
345
344
414
413
412
31 0
00
15
0
84 0
04
68 0
15
74
02
39 0
0
00
20 0
04
05
410(G/L Cart Track)
416
527/1
527/2
527/3
526
525
524/1
524/2
533
502
497
495
494
493
488
489 12. GUDHASAYPURA
0
63
09
0
07
29 0
05
31 0
14
04 0
10
44 0
11
49 0
08
80 0
19
33 0
22
89 0
11
65 0
00
20 0
17
36 0
08
17
0
13
77
55(G/L Pasture)
54/1
53/493
53/2
53/3
53/4 0
72
09
0
04
02
00
20 0
0
10
80 0
76
08
0
96
51/499/4
53/5
00
0
00
79 858
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
3
2
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
5
6 4
0
03
31
51/499/9
12. GUDHASAYPURA ( Contd ...)
0
51/499/8
11
88 0
01
79
51/499/7
35
51/1/2/5
: 0
01
11 0
03
51/1/2/6
34 0
11
51/1/2/4
81 0
51/1/2/3
09
0
10
62
51/1/2/2
0
07
45
51/1/2/1
51
45/1
45/2
45/3
50
49
44 0
20
00
0
77
23
02
0
68 0
01
08 0
22
10 0
43/489
43
33
34
8/1 13. CHAKMAHESHPURA
8/2
7
6
14
30 0
12
15
0
13
47 0
00
20 0
81
53
0
33
16 0
06
47 0
13
29
1/1 (G/ L Pasture)
1/1/3
1/2
1/3
2
3/1/2 0
22
14
20
0
88 0
16
51 0
52
29
0
18
48 0
01
62
20( Irrig.Deptt. Canal )
21
428 14. CHANDARMOOL
420
421
10
0
08 0
74
09
0
03
50
20
02 0 859
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
426 14. CHANDARMOOL ( Contd ...)
425
432
433
441
436
437
334/1/1
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
31
91 0
02
08 0
24
16
0
07
52 0
28
50 0
16
12 0
32
10
334/1/2
334/2
334/3 0
05
89
334/456/1
334/456/2/1 (G /L)
334/456/2
4.
334/453
418 0
02
42
0
00
27
416(G/L Cart Track)
415 15. MAHESHPURA
18 0
00
20 0
02
02 0
01
76
17(G/ L Cart Track)
15/2
15/1
13
16 0
14
40 0
07
48 0
13
78 0
19
20 0
09
82
73(G /L Pasture)
74
80
77
78
79
83
326
327
328
312 0
25
52 0
15
20 0
90
04
0
75
08
0
64
08
0
01
92 0
26
80 0
02
36 0
07
30 0
38
08 860
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
166/1 15. MAHESHPURA ( Contd ... )
166/2
167/1
167/2
168
165
163
163/1
163/2
55 16. MANPURA
11
12
10
16
17
21/1
21/2
21/3
19
19/1
19/2
20/1
20/2
23/1
23/2
30
25/1
25/2
26/1
26/2
37
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
6
5
0
05
80 0
00
60
01
0
60
13
0
40 0
40
18
0
03
75
62 0
12
0
00
70 0
19
50
00
0
20 0
10
49 0
81
10
67 0
06
0
07
70 0
52
09
0
01
85
05
0
00 0
27
89 0
00
20
1404/1/1
17. AKHAIPURA
1404/1/2
1404/2
1404/3
1404/4
83
0
69 86
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
District: JAIPUR Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
1403/1 17. AKHAIPURA ( Contd ... )
1403/2
1403/3
691/1/4
691/1/2
691/1/3
691/1
691/2
1402/1
1402/2
1401 (G/L Pasture)
1394/1
1394/2
1394/3
1392
1393
1390
1414(G/L Cart Track)
1144/1(G/L)
1144/2(G /L Abadi )
1128
1140
1136
1129
1135
1133
1134
1100
1098
1101
1097
1080
1079
1076(G /L Cart Track)
1075 109 GI/2005-26
State: RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
5
6 0
37
09
70 0
50
78
45
0
11
33
25
27
0
00
0
20
13 0
09
0
17
09
46 0
01
10 0
03
0
18
93 0
48
08
0
75
14
20 0
15 0
03
0
71
01
06
0
72
10
16
0
27 0
03
41 0
04
32
06
0
0
10
94 0
51
55
0
35
01
70 0
02 862
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
District : JAIPUR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
3 1
1069 17. AKHAIPURA ( Contd ... )
1065 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
6 4
5
0
03
09 0
09
01 0
01
92
1064(G/ L Cart Track)
1063 18. GANGATIKHURD
16
0
98 0
38
38
9(G/L Pasture)
0
01
58
8(G/L Cart Track)
0
07
40
7(G/L Pasture)
0
01
97
17(G/L Nala)
0
52
28
30(G/L Pasture)
0
01
57
29(G/L CartTrack)
0
31
69
18(G/L Pasture)
24
19
20
21/1
21/2 0
00
25 0
16
93 0
18
34 0
03
38 0
77
00
110(G /L Cart Track)
141/1
141/2
141/3
141/4
946 19. GANGATIKALAN
945
952
953
954
955
956
951
972
968
969
970
1444 0
03
45 0
08
87
01
0
40 0
05
76 0
07
94 0
00
24
00
0
20 0
00
32 0
01
79 0
01
89 0
05
67 0
04
05
0
64
08 863
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
1005 19. GANGATIKALAN ( Contd ... )
1006
1007
966
1008
1004
1009
1011
1012
1010
994
993
992/1
992/2
1018
991
1022
1021
1020
1029
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 4
5
6 0
00
48 0
02
40 0
92
01
0
01
20
07
0
02 0
00
20 0
01
53 0
05
54 0
00
30 0
03
63 0
01
92 0
02
25 0
16
11
0
02
79 0
00
20 0
03
23 0
18
63
07
29 0
0
13
59 0
00
20
899(G /L Cart Track)
0
42
30
898 (G / L Pasture)
858
897
895 0
04
05 0
37
06
0
12
45 0
02
61
893( Irrig.Deptt. Nali )
892
891/1
891/2 0
32
04 0
37
08 0
1075/1155
1075
1074
1073
15
48 0
23
40 0
08
19
0
04
59 0
03
78
1071(G/L Tiba )
864
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/ MAGHA 2. 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Sr No.
Area Are
Hectare
Sq mtr
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
4
1
3
5
6 2
1072
0
29
88 19. GANGATIKALAN ( Contd ... )
0
32
1064
00
1083/1
06
03
0
1083/2
0
03
87
1088 ( Irrig . Deptt. Canal )
1110/1
0
60
12
1110/2
0
60
1109
21
33
1105
0
21
0
00
20
1104
00
1106
68
0
82
31
1101
0
0
01
71
1102
0
11
16
1100
20
00
130
0
20. KHATWAR
130/1215
0
24
50
105
0
26
39
0
129
03
93
106
0
11
67
107
0
59
09
76
110
0
27
04
109
0
25
14
0
63
112
14
115
0
68
04
116
0
88
23
82
97/1207
0
97
0
16
86
10
0
02
139( Irrig . Deptt. Canal )
0
172
19
90
0
17
177
16
0
02
176
43
182
0
17
40 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
865
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
District: JAIPUR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Name of the Village
1
2
3
179 20. KHATWAR (Contd ... )
183
198 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
5
6 0
18
26
37 0
18
0
05
66 0
01
17
196(G/L Cart Track)
195
194
193 0
02
54 0
37
14
0
36
52 0
05
66
462(G/L Pasture)
412/1268
0
04
46 0
05
462/1270
03
0
462/1269
462/1273
24
50 0
06
14 0
23
465/1265
15
28
06
0
455(G/L Pasture)
27
02 0
463(G/L Pasture)
678/1
678/2 0
29
48
678/1313
681/1
681/2
677/1
677/2
677/3
673
673/1
674
667
666
656/1
656/2
656/3
657 0
09
93 0
02
40 0
10
90. 0
00
20
89
05
20
00
0
0
10
93
16
22 0
07
0
95 866
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] State : RAJASTHAN
District: JAIPUR
Sr. No.
Khasara No. Nameof the Village
3
2
1
658 20. KHATWAR (Contd ... )
642/2
Area
Are Sq.mtr Hectare
4
6
5
21 0
01
642/1/1 (G /L Kharda)
642/1/2
642/1/3
642/1/4
642/1/5
48 0
68
642/1/6
642/1/7
642/1307
642/1308
642/1309
642/1310
627
641/1
641/2
640
604
01
73 0
03
93 0
14
85 0
0
40
02
0
01
67
708( G/ L Cart Track)
20
00
0
709(G/L Kharda)
714
713
717/1362 0
13
15
43
04
0
16
0
68 0
02
16
718(G/L Sutya)
735/1
737
738
761
760
739
756
752 0
17
83 0
04
08 0
05
06 0
17
18 0
00
20 0
23
47 0
10
09 0
05
49 867
भारत कौ राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : JAIPUR
Tehsil : MOUZAMABAD
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
Khasara No.
Sr. No.
Name of the Village
4
6
5
3
2
1
67
15
0
753
KHATWAR ( Contd ... )
20.
750/1
58
56
0
750/2
[No: R-31015/72/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 262.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है किं ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यंक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को ' उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री बी.पी. पाठक , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड , एम . बी . - 7 , महाश्वेता नगर , महेन्द्र भटनागर मार्ग , उज्जैन 456010 ( मध्यप्रदेश) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 868
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश
तहसील : बड़ोद
जिला: शाजापुर
सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
4
2
3
1
87
0.2336
1 मंगवालिया
0.0305
88(शा० भूमि)
0.1174
89
91
0.0239
0.1021
90
0.0100
93(शा० नाला)
96
0.2230
0.0136
102
103
0.0179
0.0188
104 (शा० भूमि)
105
0.1042
106
0.0348
107
0.0133
0.0633
112
116
0.1737
0.0319
114 (शा० भूमि)
0.0306
138 (शा० रास्ता)
0.0997
141
0.0874
145
147
0.2244
466
0.1576
0.0565
461
0.0564
464
0.2477
465
463
0.0530
546
0.0293
0.4547
574(शा० वन)
0.0117
460
0.0144
113( शा० नाला)
0.0864
146
0.0180
143
0.1980
467(शा० वन)
0.0100
115(शा०भुमि)
0.0100
148 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
86
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
सर्वे नंबर
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
3 1
2
2 पिपलिया घाटा
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
0.2996
895(शा० वन)
883 0.3365
0.1651
880(शा०भुमि)
877
867
851
852
853
855
854 0.1941
0.1828
0.0922
0.0510
0.0439
0.0847
0.0950
0.0658
826(शा०भुमि)
825( शा०नाला)
824
808
809
817
815
775
774
773
772
771
770
767
769
971
749
748
747
750
745 0.0190
0.0626
0.0348
0.0858
0.1091
0.1167
0.0514
0.0107
0.0143
0.0140
0.1070
0.0651
0.0387
0.0645
0.1043
0.0438
0.0668
0.1564
0.0182
0.2216
0.0245
716(शा० रास्ता)
713
984(शा० भुमि)
712
981
709(शा० भुमि)
708(शा० भुमि) 3 बरदा बरखेड़ा
268(शा० भुमि) 109 G1 /2005-27
0.1415
0.0144
0.1451
0.0728
0.0444
0.0519
0.2312 870
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
'क्र० ग्राम का नाम
1
3
4
2
89
0.2861
4 माहूरूण्डी
90
0.0171
402
0.0459
401
0.1185
0.1194
398
397
0.1310
0.1808
419
439
0.8489
438
0.3205
440
0.1399
5 सारंगाखे
0.0496
3(शा० वन)
0.0215
4(शा० वन)
0.4833
5(शा० वन)
0.0152
6(शा० नाला)
0.9212
7(शा० वन)
0.0218
71 ( शा० रास्ता)
65
0.1744
62
0.1462
0.0936
61(शा० नाला)
60
0.0412
0.0919
59
54
0.0153
55
0.1696
0.1503
52
0.0285
268 (शा० रास्ता)
291
0.0841
269
0.0488
270
0.0429
271
0.0663
272
0.0611
273
0.0639
274
0.0297
275
0.0230
276
0.0143
0.0303
181 (शा० रास्ता)
354
0.0199
353
0.0612
352
0.1087
458
0.0400
जारी ..... 5 871
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
ग्राम का नाम
क्र०
3
2
1
459 5 सारंगाखेड़ी (जारी.....)
457
455
464
465
466 4
0.1440
0.0900
0.0144
0.1240
0.0464
0.0580
0.0130
482(शा० भुमि)
483
481
501
502
503
504
500
495
499
496
498
497 0.0100
0.1369
0.0238
0.0353
0.0307
0.0146
0.1148
0.0248
0.0235
0.0267
0.0404
0.0274
0.0350
518(शा० नाला)
292
460 6 श्यामगढ़
0.0100
0.0200
1.8987
26(शा० वन)
0.0866
60(शा० वन)
59 0.0100
0.0244
69(शा० नाला)
68
572 0.0335
0.0169
0.2798
67(शा० वन)
0.3031
66( शा० वन)
0.0154
576(शा० नाला)
588 ( शा० रास्ता) 0.0124 872
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
4
3
1
2
0.0200
57
6 श्यामगढ़ (जारी.....)
0.0200
58
[फा. सं. आर-31015/69/2004-ओ.आर-II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th January, 2005
S. O. 262. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , an extension pipeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ;
6 And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;
Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri V.P. Pathak , Competent Authority , Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , MB - 7, Mahashweta Nagar , Mahendra Bhatnagar Marg, Ujjain - 456 010 ( Madhya Pradesh) 873 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2,1926
SCHEDULE
TEHSIL : BAROD
STATE : MADHYA PRADESH
DISTRICT : SHAJAPUR
NAME OF VILLAGE
SURVEY NO .
AREA IN HECTARE S.No.
4
3
1
2
0.2336
87
1 MANGAWALIYA
0.0305
88(Govt.Land)
0.1174
89
91
0.0239
90
0.1021
0.0100
93(Govt.nale)
96
0.2230
102
0.0136
0.0179
103
0.0188
104(Govt. Land)
0.1042
105
0.0348
106
107
0.0133
112
0.0633
116
0.1737
0.0319
114(Govt.Land)
0.0306
138(Govt. Rasta)
141
0.0997
145
0.0874
0.2244
147
466
0.1576
0.0565
461
0.0564
464
465
0.2477
0.0530
463
0.0293
546
0.4547
574(Govt . Forest)
460
0.0117
0.0144
113(Govt. Nala)
0.0864
146
143
0.0180
0.1980
467(Govt.Forest)
0.0100
115(Govt.Land)
0.0100
148 874
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
SURVEY NO .
AREA IN HECTARE
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
1
2
3
4
2
0.2996
PIPLIYA GHATA
895(Govt.Forest)
883
0.3365
0.1651
880(Govt.Land)
877
0.1941
867
0.1828
851
0.0922
852
0.0510
853
0.0439
855
0.0847
854
0.0950
0.0658
826(Govt.Land)
0.0190
825(Govt.Nala)
824
0.0626
808
0.0348
0.0858
809
817
0.1091
815
0.1167
775
0.0514
774
0.0107
773
0.0143
772
0.0140
771
0.1070
770
0.0651
0.0387
767
0.0645
769
971
0.1043
749
0.0438
748
0.0668
747
0.1564
750
0.0182
0.2216
745
0.0245
716( Govt.Rasta)
713
0.1415
0.0144
984(Govt.Land)
712
0.1451
981
0.0728
0.0444
709(Govt.Land)
0.0519
708(Govt.Land)
0.2312
3 BARDA BARKHERA
268(Govt.Land)
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
875
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
SURVEY NO .
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
2
3 1
89 4 MAHURUNDI
90
402
401
398
397
419
439
438
440 5 SARANGAKHERI
AREA IN HECTARE
4
0.2861
0.017.1
0.0459
0.1185
0.1194
0.1310
0.1808
0.8489
0.3205
0.1399
0.0496
3(Govt.Forest)
0.0215
4(Govt.Forest)
0.4833
5(Govt.Forest)
0.0152
6(Govt.Nala)
7(Govt.Forest) .
0.9212
0.021.8
71(Govt.Rasta)
65
62 0.1744
0.1462
0.0936
61(Govt.Nala)
60
59
54
55
52 0.0412
0.0919
0.0153
0.1696
0.1503
0.0285
268(Govt. Rasta)
291
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276 0.0841
0.0488
0.0429
0.0663
0.0611
0.0639
0.0297
0.0230
0.0143
0.0303
181( Govt. Rasta)
354
353
352
458 0.0199
0.0612
0.1087
0.0400 876
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
SURVEY NO .
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
AREA IN HECTARE
4
2
3
1
459
0.1440
5 SARANGAKHERI
457
0.0900
(Contd..... )
455
0.0144
0.1240
464
465
0.0464
466
0.0580
0.0130
482(Govt.Land)
483
0.0100
481
0.1369
501
0.0238
502
0.0353
0.0307
503
0.0146
504
500
0.1148
0.0248
495
499
0.0235
0.0267
496
0.0404
498
497
0.0274
0.0350
518(Govt.Nala)
292
0.0100
0.0200
460
1.8987
6 SHYAMGARH
26(Govt.Forest)
0.0866
60(Govt.Forest)
0.0100
59
0.0244
69(Govt.Nala)
68
0.0335
0.0169
572
0.2798
67(Govt. Forest)
0.3031
66(Govt . Forest)
0.0154
576(Govt.Nala)
0.0124
588(Govt. Rasta)
877
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
SURVEY NO .
AREA IN HECTARE 1
2
4
3
57
0.0200
6 SHYAMGARH ( Contd ..... )
58
0.0200
[No. R- 31015/69/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 263.- केन्द्र सरकार , एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचनाओं सं० का ०आ० 831 तारीख 01 अप्रैल , 2004 और का० आ० 1442 तारीख 17 जून , 2004 का आशोधन करते हुए , तथा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन , गुजरात राज्य के राज्यक्षेत्र के भीतर , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की मुंद्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए श्री एफ.ए. बाबी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुंद्रा- बठिंडा पाइपलाइन परियोजना को , उनके अपने कार्यभार के साथ- साथ , प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[फा. सं. आर -31015 /6/2004- ओ.आर- II ] हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th January , 2005
S. O. 263. In modification of notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 831 dated the 1st April , 2004 and S.O. 1442 dated the 17th June , 2004 , and in pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri F.A. Babi , Competent Authority , Mundra- Bathinda Pipeline Project to perform the functions of the competent authority for Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline ofHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, in addition to his own duties , under the said Act, within the territory of State of Gujarat .
[No. R- 31015/6/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी, 2005
अधिसूचना
का. आ. 264.- केन्द्र सरकार , एतद्वारा पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार के का.आ. 1598 दिनांक 06 जुलाई , 2004 का आशोधन करते हुए तथा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में , उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियमें कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की मुंबई-पुणे पाइपलाइन और हाज़ारवाड़ी के रास्ते लोनी से पकनी तक मुंबई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार 109 GI /2005-28 878
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] परियोजना के लिए , सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित अनुसूची के कॉलम ( 1 ) में कथित व्यक्तियों को अनुसूची के क्रमशः कॉलम 2 क, 2 ख तथा 3 में तदनुरूपी प्रविष्टियों में उल्लिखित क्षेत्र , प्रादेशिक अधिकारिता तथा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रयोज्यता के भीतर , प्राधिकृत करती है ।
अनूसूची
सक्षम प्राधिकृत का नाम व पता
(1)
महाराष्ट्र राज्य में प्रादेशिक अधिकारिता
(2क)
अधिनियम के लागू खंड (3)
(2ख)
सभी खण्ड
महाराष्ट्र राज्य
मुंबई-पुणे पाइपलाइन
हाजारवाड़ी के रास्ते लोनी से पकनी तक मुंबई-पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना श्री एम वी चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुंबई-पुणे पाइपलाइन , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मेगा सैंटर , मागरपट्टा-एमएण्डएन विंग , हादापसर-411028 (जिला- पुणे)
श्री एस एन . कुन्देतकर ,
सक्षम प्राधिकारी ,
हाजारवाड़ी के रास्ते लोनी से पकनी तक मुंबई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना मुंबई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , मेगा सैंटर , मागडा एम एण्ड एन विंग , हादापसर- 411028
(जिला पुणे)
खण्ड 10 व 11 के जिला पुणे
अतिरिक्त सभी खण्ड जिला सतारा
खण्ड 10 व 11 जिला पुणे
जिला सतारा
जिला सांगली
सभी खण्ड
जिला सोलापुर
[फा. सं. आर-31015/7/2004- ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th January , 2005
S. O. 264. In modification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1598 dated the 6th July , 2004 and in pursuance of clause ( a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby authorizes the persons mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Schedule below to perform the functions of the competent authority , under the said Act, within the area, territorial jurisdiction and applicability of said Act mentioned in the corresponding entries in Column 2A, 2B and 3 respectivcly of the Schedule for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited's Mumbai - Pune Pipeline and Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi .
SCHEDULE
Competent Authority's Name and Address
Territorial Jurisdiction in the State of
Maharashtra
[ 1 ]
[2A] Shri M.V. Chitnis
Applicable Sections of theAct
[2B]
[3]
All Sections
Mumbai - Pune Pipeline
Mumbai - Pune State of
Maharashtra
PuneDistrict All sections except sections 10 and 11
Pipeline Extension
Project from Loni to
Pakni via Hazarwadi
Competent Authority, Mumbai - Pune Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. Mega Center , Magarpatta - M & N Wing,
Hadapsar- 411028 (PuneDistrict)
Shri S.N. Kundetkar
Competent Authority , Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project,
Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project from Loni to Pakni via Hazarwadi
Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. , Mega Center , Magarpatta- M & N
Wing, Hadapsar-411028 (PuneDistrict)
Satara District
PuneDistrict
Satara District
Sections 10 and 11
Sangli District
All Sections
Solapur District
[No. R- 31015/7/2004 - O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
879 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 / माघ 2,1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 20 जनवरी , 2005
का. आ. 265.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 2788 दिनांक 26 आक्टोबर , 2004 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर , पारादीप हल्दीया पाइपलाइन प्रणाली परियोजना हेतु कच्चे तेल का परिवहन करने के प्रयोजन के लिये उडीसा राज्य के पारादीप से पश्चिम बंगाल के हल्दीया तक पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तहसील : बासुदेवपूर, जिलाः भद्रक , उड़ीसा की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 25-11-2004 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी , उड़ीसा , ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला : भद्रक
राज्य : उड़िसा
क्षेत्रफल
तहसील का नाम गाँव का नाम
खसरा संख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
2
1
3
4
5
6
1678
0
04
88
बासुदेबपूर
बागदाबिनायकपुर
1677
00
0
56
1675
0
05
28
1659
0
34
02
0
1660
03
03
1662
0
00
39
1661
0
01
28
1657
0
02
60
0
1653
00
84 880
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
4
2
1
3
0
1654
0
1655
0
1656
0
1642
0
1643
0
1641
0
282
साबरपुर
0
277
0
278
0
281
0
279
0
835
0
299
0
302
0
301
305
0
0
303
0
304
267
0
0
236
0
235
0
237
0
239
0
238
0
130
0
138
0
137
136
0
0
847
0
140
0
141
150
0
0
155
0
151
154
0
0
152
0
153
0
162
कलासिया
163
0
0
167
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
6
5
12
01
06
10
22
00
10
65
00
59
03
41
83
00
47
05
58
01
91
01
33
09
24
00
51
04
02
24
34
02
10
00
16
04
00
31
62
07
00
38
10
00
36
04
03
01
06
53
00
21
08
44
52
01
10
17
84
02
04
78
06
37
03
50
00
39
03
22
01
09
30
02
03
23
04
12
00
20
00
10 881
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
5
4
6
3
142
0
00
51
00
0
62
172
00
87
0
91
0
86
06
85
0
05
84
75
175
01
25
0
00
20
176
0
0
00
11
82
177
0
12
52
00
0
179
41
0
01
47
178
00
51
45
0
05
52
0
50
00
59
10
0
0
53
08
98
58
00
98
0
56
20
00
0
10
0
23
57
320
0
03
24
अरतुंग
[फा. सं . -25011 /11 /2004- ओ.आर-1 ]
रेणुका कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th January, 2005
S. O. 265. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2788 dated the 26 October, 2004 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land in Tehsil : Basudevpur , District : Bhadrak , in Orissa State , specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia in the State of West Bengal by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the Paradip Haldia Crude Oil Pipeline Project.
And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 25.11.2004;
And whereas , the Competent Authority , has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted his report to the Central Government ;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired ;
882
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests from the date ofpublication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
Schedule
District : Bhadrak
State : Orissa
Area
Name of Tehsil Name of Village Khasra No.
Hectare Are Sq . mtr.
2
1
3
4
5
6
1678
0
04
88
Basudevpur Bagadabinayakpur
0
00
56
1677
0
05
28
1675
02
34
0
1659
1660
0
03
03
1662
0
00
39
1661
0
01
28
1657
0
02
60
0
00
84
1653
0
01
1654
12
1655
10
06
0
1656
0
22
00
1642
0
10
65
00
1643
0
59
1641
03
41
0
282
00
83
0
Sabarpur
47
277
0
05
0
01
278
58
91
281
0
01
0
279
09
33
00
24
835
0
0
299
04
51
302
0
02
24
0
34
301
02
305
0
10
00
303
0
04
16 883
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2,1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
3
5
6
2
4
1
0
00
31
304
07
267
0
62
00
38
236
0
10
0
00
235
04
36
237
0
0
01
03
239
53
238
0
06
130
0
00
21
138
0
08
44
137
0
01
52
136
0
10
17
847
0
84
02
140
0
04
78
0
141
06
37
150
0
03
50
155
0
00
39
0
151
03
22
154
0
01
09
152
0
02
30
153
0
03
23
162
0
12
04
Kalasia
00
163
0
20
167
00
0
10
142
0
00
51
0
172
00
62
87
00
0
91
85
0
06
86
0
75
05
84
0
01
25
175
00
20
176
0
0
11
00
82
12
52
177
0
0
41
179
00
0
47
178
01
51
0
00
45
52
50
0
05
59
0
00
10
0
08
53
98
58
0
00
98
00
56
0
20
0
23
57
10
0
320
03
24
Artung
[No. R- 25011 / 11 /2004- O.R. -I ] RENUKA KUMAR , Under Secy.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 884
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
श्रम मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 23 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 266.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 60/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/ 373 / 97 - आई ० आर० ( बी. II ) ]
सी० गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR
The workman has filed statement of claim . In his statement of claim , it has been stated that the above noted workman was appointed as a messenger on temporary basis , though he was told that his capacity of workman will be permanent , w.e.f. 03-09-1991 by the Indian Overseas Bank, Defence Colony , Branch. The salary of the above noted workman was fixed at Rs . 1,450 per month including all the benefits , letter dt . 30-11-1992 issued by the Manager , Indian Overseas Bank , Defence Colony is attached herewith as Annexure -A through which the workman was appointed with the above noted bank. That since the appointment the above noted workman has been doing his work very sincerely , faithfully and has never given any chance of complaint from Management/employer on his efficiency conduct on his part in descharging duties assigned to the workman .
New Delhi , the 23rd December , 2004
S.O. 266. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref No. 60/98 ) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , New Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012/373/97 - IR(B -II) ]
C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
That the workman has been working regularly without any break till 19-02-1997 since his appointment i.e. 03-09-1991 . It is pertinent to mention here that there is not even a day break in the services of the workman from the inception of his employment till his illegal termination by the management. The workman had been serving the above noted bank, Defence Colony, Branch with his best capabilities . That on 19-02-1997 the above noted branch of IndianOverseas Bank. Defence Colony, has terminated the services of the workman without giving any notice and without assigning any cause for the above said illegal and unjustified termination . That on 19-02-1997 , the time of termination the workman was drawing Rs . 2,710 per month as his wages including all the other allowances and some other payments , he was getting in terms of extra works-wages .
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI
Presiding Officer : R. N. Rai .
I.D. No. 60/98
In The Matter of:-
Sh . Suraj Mal S/o Sh . Kalu Ram, R/ o F - 140 , Maidan Garhi ,
New Delhi - 110068 .
That the poor workman who has to carry out the family responsibilities was fully dependent on the above noted employment and has no other means of income , has come on the street in the absene of his employment and has no other means of income hence he is forced to seek helps from different sources but in vain . The workman is at edge of starvation .
VERSUS
The Regional Manager ,
Indian Overseas Bank ,
Rajendra Place , Pusa Road,
New Delhi - 110008 .
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 373/97 - IR- (B - II) Central Government Dt . 26-02-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication.
The point runs as hereunder:-
That the bank has terminated the services of the workman verbally and has not given any letter for the same. The workman had requested the officer of the bank not to terminate the services of the poor workman but in vain, and also the employer bank has not given any reason for the termination . The workman was asked to go flatly despite his six years long association with the bank . That the action of the termination of the services of the workman is illegal and unjustified and with sheer / absolute contravention of the labour laws on the part of the management/bank .
Whether the action of the Management of Indian Overseas Bank in terminating the services of Sh. Suraj Mal , Messenger , w.e.f. 19-02-1997 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled" .
The management has filed written statement. In the written statement , it has been stated that the claim of the workman is not maintainable either in law as well as in facts . That claim petition is totally misconceived, untenable , against the law laid down by the Hon'ble [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Supreme Court as reported in 1996 6 SCC 216 and 1998 2 L.L.J. 627 and contrary to the Employment Exchange [Compulsory notification of vacancies ] Act, 1959 and against the Banking Service Recruitment Rules and Regulations and the Government Guidelines .
As per the law laid down by the above mentioned judgements , the management , being a nationalized bank is under legal obligation to give wide publicity through media notifying the each and every vacancy arising with them and recruit the candidates for permanent vacanicies . Whereas the service of Sh . Suraj Mal was utilized by the bank purely as unapproved candidate whose engagement was on temporary basis which will not give him the right to have any lien over permanent employment . If an irregular employment is regularised countrary to law and is approved by a judicial decision not only those persons who are the beneficiaries of the irregular appointment could get undue advantage over the regular appointments made as per rules but would also frustrate and defeat the object ofthe Employment Exchange [ Compulsory Notification of vacancies ) Act , 1959 .
For the above raised preliminary objection the claim petition is liable to be rejected by this Hon'ble Court .
That the above noted workman was appointed as a messenger on temporary basis , but it is denied that he was told that his capacity of workman will be permanent w.e.f. 03-09-1991 by the Indian Overseas Bank , Defence Colony Branch . It is not correct that the salary of the workman was fixed Rs . 1450.00 p.m. including all the benefits . The manager of the Branch is not an appointing authority . The letter dated 30-11-1992 issued by the bank manager is not appointment letter at all as claimed by the workman.
The service of the workman is utilized only by the Defence Colony branch of the management , whenever temporary vacancy arose purely on daily wages basis . It is not true and correct that he has worked from 03-09-1991 to 19-02-1997 without any break . He was paid minimum wages for those days his services were utilized by the bank . It is denied that the workman has been terminated without any notice and without assigning any cause of the termination . In fact the services of the workman were dispensed with by the Defence Colony branch from 17-07-1997 onwards as his services were no more required, by the branch.
It is not correct that on 19-02-1997 , the time of termination the workman was drawing Rs . 2710.00 per month as his wages including all other allowances and some other payments which he was getting in terms of extra-work -wages . The workman was paid minimum wages incash for those days he worked in the Bank . The workman is put to strict proof how he has arrived at the sum of Rs . 2710.00 as his last drawn wage from the bank . It is not true and correct that the workman has served the bank for 109 GI/2005-29
885
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
more than 6years without even a single break . The workman is put to strict proof of the same.
It is denied that the workman was not given any reason/answer for his termination by ; the bank officers , on 19-02-1997 when the officer of the Bank informed the workman that his services are not required any further. The management being a nationalized bank could not act contrary to the provisions of the employment exchange act and the rules relating to selection of temporary messengers by the Board of officials hence the service of theworkman was dispensed with from 19-02-1997 .
Since the workman was neither sponsored by the Employment Exchange nor included in the approved panel of the temporary messenger therefore the management bank could not continue with the temporary/ substitute service of the workman . It is denied that the action of the termination of the services of the workman is illegal and unjustified and with sheer/ absolute contravention of the labour laws as alleged . It is true that the workman has opened an account No. 1746/3 in the branch. The workman is paid by cash for those days he was engaged in the Defence Colony branch . It is denied that the workman has six years long association with the bank without any single break.
Itis true that on 14-03-1997 , workman served the legal/demand notice through his advocate was received by branch management as well as regional office . Since the engagement of the workman in the branch as of substitute as purely temporary in nature his name was not included in the approved panel of the temporary messenger and the claimant was well aware of these facts hence management had not sent any reply to his notice . It is respectfully submitted that the workman was engaged by theDefence Colony Branch of the management purely as a substitute. The question of payment of any amount towards his dispensing with his further service does not arise .
It is denied that the termination of workman had beenmade without observing the law prevailing in India . The action of the employer is justified and it is in consonance with the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court andthe Employment Exchange Act and compliance with the guidelines issued by the Government and followed throughout the country . It is denied that the employer has terminated the services of the workman w.e.f. 19-02-1997 without assigning any reason for the same and the same amounts to victimization . It is wrong to say that the termination of the workman is illegal, unjustified , unfair and consequently no question of reinstatement of the workman with back wages arises . Moreover utilization of his services any further, would be against the legislative intend, Government guidelines and against the spirit of the decision laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court .
It is denied that the bank has violated the prescribed provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1997. No specific 886
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] provisions is stated and the claim of the workman is based on surmises , conjectures and inadmissible in law .
The management has denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim .
as a substiute but no name has been given against which employee, he has worked . There was no other messenger from 3-9-1991 to 19-02-1997 in the Branch . He was the sole messenger or the workman in the Branch and he performed all the duties of the Branch and he was treated in writing as temporary employee . So , the plea of the management is thathe worked as a substitute is not tenable .
The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has stated that he worked continuously w.e.f. 3-9-1991 to 19-02-1997 and he got payment every month by voucher . He was a temporary employee and it has been mentioned on the vouchers that he is a temporary employee .
My attention was drawn to 1998 S. C. cases -258 . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case the appointment is based on political consideration , and the services are terminated , and Govt . have issued notification for reducing expenditure and the Government has prohibited to fill up the vacant posts and the creation of new posts including regularisation, in such circumstances , regularisation is not permissible , contrary to the administrative directions . In the instant case , there is no administrative direction and the workman applicant was not appointed on political considerations so the law cited isnot applicable .
My attention was drawn to 1997 ( 1 ) Hon'ble SC Cases , 350 , the judgement of the High Court is regarding adhoc appointees and the appointing authority is the Public Service Commission so it was held that it was not permissible. In this connection , no process of recruitment has been bypassed and the appointment is not adhoc appointment so the law cited by the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case .
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman that it is admitted by the management that he has worked from 03-09-1991 to 19-02-1997 . The management has stated in this , written statement that it is not correct that he has worked without break but the management has not filed any paper to slow the break in his service . On every payment cheque , temporary employce has been written . He has not been given appointment letter for a fixed term appointment or for adhoc appointment se workman applicant is not daily rated workman . He is not a workman for a fixed period and he is not an adhoc employce . He has worked for more than 240 day's and almost for 6 years . The bank prepared a panel for temporary messenger but his name was not included as his name was not sponsored by the employment exchange . It was submitted from the side of the management that the appointment is against the rules of recruitment . The Manager is not the competent authority to appoint the workman applicant His name was not sent from employment exchange . He is a substitute and a purely temporary employee . It has been adınitted by the bank that the workman worked for the aforesaid period as a temporary employee .
My acen was drawn to 1994( 2) Hon'ble SC Cases , 630 , the Hon'ble SC has held that in case , there is an ad-hoc appointment , in violation of statutory rules , in such cases thead - hoc appointinent cannot be regularised . This law of the Hon'blé SC is not also applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case .
So far as the competency of the Branch Manager is concerned . even if the Branch Manager is not the competent authority and the appointment is illegal and invalid even then , the workman is entitled to compensation otherwise 25 ( F ) will be attracted in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of M.P. , 1994 LLJ - 11-320 . As such , there is no force in the arguments of the management that he was appointed by the Branch Manager and the Branch Manager is not the competent authorny In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Court . he is entitled to compensation . He has not been paid any compensation. as such . Section 25 (F) of the ID Actis attracted .
The other point raised by the management is that his name was not sponsored by the employment exehange . The management is not bound to employ every person being sponsored by the employment exchange . It is the duty of the management to call for names from the employ ment exchange and those who were found fit and have not been sponsored by the employment exchange can also be appointed . There is no illegality in it . It has further been submitted that the workman applicant worked
My attention was drawn to 1996 ( 2) Hon'ble SC cases 562 this case is about Asstt . Development Officers , where as the workman applicant is a class -4 employee so this law of the Hon'ble SC is also not applicable,.My attention was drawn to 1998 (A) Hon'ble SC cases 258 , the judgement of the Hon'ble SC is about daily rated muster roll casual labour so this judgement of the Hon'ble SC is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case . It is clear that the workman served the bank as temporary employee for almost 6 years and it is also admitted that the management prepared a panel of temporary messengers . In the circumstances the workman applicant should have been given preference. It is settled law pronounced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that last cum first go should be followed in the cases of temporary employees . The workman applicant was a temporary employee . As such , be should be given preference and his name should be included in the list of panel of temporary messengers prepared but the bank has given no concessions to the workmanapplicant who served the bank continuously for 6 years . Section 25 (F) of the ID Act in such cases is attracted. He was a temporary employee . As such , when [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
his services were terminated , he should have been given compensation and be should also have been given the benefit of 25 (G ) and (H). The post of a messenger is purely a post of unskilled worker or a peon . Only 8th class pass qualification is required . The appointment is not political or ad -hoc but he was appointed in view of the necessity of thework and he worked for long six years . Such employees should be regularised and their name should he included while preparing a panel for temporary employees . No rules of recruitment has been followed and it has not been shown by the bank as to what rules of appointment have been followed . The management has filed no recruitment rules . The law cited by the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . The workman applicant should have been regularised or absorbed in view of long unblemished service . The management has not followed 25( f) and 25(g) of the ID Act. The workman applicant deserves to be regularised . He is a manual worker so he must be doing some work . So 20% back wages is sufficient in the facts and circumstances of the case .
The reference is replied thus:-
The action of the management of the Indian Overseas Bank in terminating the services of Sh . Suraj Mal , Messenger, w.e.f. 19-02-1997 is neither legal and nor justified . The workman applicant deserves to be reinstated w.e.f. 19-02-1997 with 20 % back wages . The management is directed to reinstate the workman and pay him the wages thathave accrued within one month from the date of the publication of the award. In case of default , the workman applicant will be entitled to 12% interest per annum on the entire back wages .
The award is given accordingly.
Dt. 17-12-2004
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 267.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 213/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल-12012/33/1998- आई . आर. ( बी. II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd December, 2004 S.O. 267. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 213/98 ) of the Cent.Govt . Indus . Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , New
887
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 / माघ 2 , 1926
Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-12-2004.
[No. L - 12012/33 / 1998 - IR(B - II ) ]
C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : CUM- LABOUR COURT - IL, NEW DELHI
1.D. No. 213/98 PresidingOfficer : R. N. Rai .
In The Matter of:-
Sh . Gordhan Lal Phogat
S/ o Kanwar Singh , R/ o Lachman Colony Ballabgarh Faridabad.
Versus
UCOBank
The ZonalManager. UCO Bank , Zonal Office , S.C.O. 1092-93 ,
Sector 22-B,
Chandigarh 160022
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 33/ 98 - IR(B - II ) Central Government Dt . 20-10-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication .
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank in treating Sh . Gordhan Lal Phogat , Gunman/ Armed Guard as Voluntarily retired from Bank Services w.e.f. 3-4-95 is just and legal? If not , what relief is the workman entitled to" .
The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the above named workman joined respondent as Gun man/Armed guard w.e.f. 17-12-84. His provident fund No. is 39438. He was drawing Rs . 2500/- per month at the time of his illegal termination . That the workman came to resutne his duties after the death of his wife , he was not permitted to do so by the respondent without assigning any reason . Several representations were made to the respondent by the workman directly and through UCO Bank employees union registered but of no avail . Respondent had not permitted the workman to resume his duties though his services have not been terminated at all which is evident from the letters of Divisional Manager of respondent . Respondent have always kept on prolonging the matter by informing the workman that his matter was under consideration and he would soon be taken back on duty.
Thatit ispertinent to mention here that due to certain unavoidable circumstances i.e. serious illness of workman's wife he was use to attend to his de 888
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 7-1-992 . the workman tried his level best to provide every possible treatment to his wife but she finally died . It is mentioned here that during her illness the workman kept on informing the respondent about his inabilityto attend duties.
admitting that respondent are competent to treat the workman as voluntarily retired in view of the alleged Bipartite Settlement datedt . 8-9-93 on liis failure to report on duty within 30 days of the notice dated 4-3-95 even then respondent was liable to pay/offer retrenchment benefits to the workman before the removal / striking off his name from records of the bank and the said settlement if any is violative of mandatory provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and therefore is untenable under the law and can not over ride the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. In view of violation of mandatory provisions of section 25 (f) of Industrial Disputes Act the respondent is leftwith no other alternative but to withdraw his aforesaid illegal order of termination and to allow the workman to resume his duties forthwith . Even otherwise respondent has failed to seek prior permission to retrench the workman from the appropriate Government as he has more than 100 employees with him/ respondent .
That when it became absolutely impossible for the workman to wait furtlıer as he had already reached starving point he had issued a legal notice dated 18/20-8-96 to the respondent . However instead of allowing him to assume his duties and or to impart any information , the respondent kept on sleeping over the matter. In those circumstances a reminder dated 12-9-96 was also issued to the respondent in continuation with the aforesaid legal notice . Only thereafter respondent replied to earlier legal notice dated 12-8-96 vide his letter dated 4-10-96 whereby respondent disclosed for the first time that since the workman remained absent without any application for leave he was deemed to be voluntarily retired from bank services w.e.f. 3-4-95 since then he failed to resume his duties despite notice dated 4-3-95 . It was further mentioned therein that the aforesaid notice was sent as per clause of Bipartite settlement dated 8-9-93. The workman did not join his duties inspite of notice .
In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above it is , therefore, prayed that claimant/workman may kindly be re - instated with full backwage continuity of service and all other benefits and accordingly an award may please be passed in favour of the claimant and against the respondent .
That the workman came to know for the first time that on the receipt of the aforesaid letter of respondent dated 4-10-96 addressedto the lawyer of the workman thathis services were terminated illegally w.e.f. 3-4-95 . It is pertinent to mention here that the workman had never received letter dated 4-3-95 alleged to have been issued by respondent.
The management/respondent has filed WS. In the WS ithas been submitted that the claim statement made by the claimant/ workman is misconceived vague and against the facts and law as such the same is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed . That the claim madeby the claimant/ workman does not come or fall under the ambit and scope of the Industrial Disputes Act and the rules framed thereunder , as such the claim statement filed by the claimant/ workman is liable to be dismissed and the reference answered accordingly .
That the termination of claimant/workman from his services is legal and justified. In this connection para- 17 (a) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 10th April , 1989 is quoted hereas under ;
That the workman has succeded in laying hands in certain letters written by respondent to the Divisional Office ofhis bank at Chandigarh after the receipt of letter of the respondent dated 4-10-96 . These letters disclosed thatrespondent terminated services of the workman in a most illegal fashion vide letter dated 4-3-95. It is proved from the letter ofrespondent bearing No. 288/95 dated 4-3-95, 289/95 dated 4-3-95 and letter No. 428-30/95 dated 4-4-95 all of them were addressed to the Divisional Manager , Chandigarh that the workman did not receive the notice of respondent dated 4-3-95 as respondent received back the letter with the remark of Postal Authorities on it that he was not residing on the said address.
It is pertinent to mention here that the aforesaid notice was sent to the workman at his native place where he was not residing at all and the respondent were well aware that the workman did not stay in the village and he was residing at Faridabad and respondent were having his address in his records . It is also revealed from the aforesaid letter that while striking off his name from employment of respondent , respondent did not pay any retrenchment benefit as required under section 25 ( f) of Industrial Disputes Act to him .
Hence aforesaid order of termination is totally unlawful and liable to be set aside . Assuming though not
"when an employee absents himself from work for a period of 90 days or more consecutive days without submitting an application for leave sanctioned originally / subsequently when there is a satisfactory evidence that he has taken up employment in India or when the management is reasonably satisfied that he has no intention ofjoining duties the management may at any time thereafier give a notice to the employee at his last known residence calling upon him to report for duty within 30 days of the date of notice stating inter- alia the grounds for coming to the conclusion that the employee has no intention of joining the duties and furnishing necessary evidence where availabie Unless the employee reports for duty within 30 days of the notice or gives an explanation for his absence within the said period of 30 days satisfying the management that he has 889 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2, 1926
not taken up another employement or avocation and that he has no intention of not joining duties the employee will be deemed to have voluntarily retired from the bank's service on the expiry of the said notice . In the event of the employee submitting a satisfactory reply he shall be permitted to report for duty thereafter within 30 days from the date of the expiry of the aforesaid notice without prejudice to the bank's right to take any action under the law or rules of services" .
7-1-1992 and remained absent upto 18-08-1996 without any information . The copy of the notice dt. 4-3-1995 is annexed with the record. The workman applicant gave legal notice for the first time on 20-08-1996 . The workman applicant has not filed any letter sent to the bank . There is no proof that the workman applicant has informed the bank regarding his illness . The legal notice has been issued by theworkman so it is established that the workman applicant was absent from 7-1-1992 to 18-08-1996 . He was absent for almost for more than four years .
My attention was drawn from the side of the workman to LLR 1998 page 385. The workman applicant was absent for seven consecutive days and his services were terminated, the Hon'ble Court held that it was not proper. In 2001 Lab I.C. 71 SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that overstaying of leave cannot result in automatic termination of service . An opportunity should be provided to hear the workman applicant.
In terms of the above mentioned clause of the Bipartite Settlement the employee was given a notice of30 days vide letter dated 4-3-95 issued by the branch office Faridabad on the last recorded address of the claimant/ workman to resume duty . This notice was sent to his last recorded address and contained the reasons/ grounds for coming to the conclusion that the employee has no intention of joining his duties. The employee failed to resume his duties within the stipulated period of 30 days from the date of notice dated 4-3-95 and therefore , was deemed to have voluntarily retired from the bank's services onthe expiry of the said notice . As such the contention of the claimant/workman that he has illegally been terminated from bank's services is absolutely wrong and baseless .
That the cause of the claimant/ workman has not been espoused by the association where the workman was working but has filed the claim in his individual capacity as such the dispute raised by the claimant may be an individual dispute but does not constitute an industrial dispute as such also the claim made by the claimant/workman is not maintainable and is liable to be rejected as the provisions of industrial disputes act are not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case.
The workman has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has denied most of the paras of the written statement .
The management has also denied most of the paras of the statement of claim and rejoinder. It is admitted to both the parties that the workman applicant was appointed on 17-12-1984 but he was absent from 7-1-1992 on account ofillness ofhis wife . The management sent him noticedt. 4-3-1995 and voluntarily retired him on 3-4-1995 . The workman applicant has denied that he received any notice.
In 1997 LLR 344, it has been held that service cannot be terminated without holding enquiry . These cases cited by the workman applicant are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . In the instant case , the workman applicant absented himself for four and half years and the management was within a few kilometers of his residence . He ought to have contacted the management . He has not filed even the certificates to support his case that he was so ill that he could not inform the management regarding his illness . He should have sent applications alongwith medical certificates but he has not given any application supported by any medical certificate . He could not explain why he absented himself for four and a half years . It is the duty of the workman applicant to intimate the management as to why he absented for a long period . He has not disclosed any illness which will take four and a half years . It indicates that for sometime , he was not willing to join the management for duty and the attention of abandonment is clear from his very acts . The management cannot wait for four and half years for an employee . The employee was duty bound to inform the management regarding his illness and his whereabouts . The may be convicted for that period and he may not remain in Delhi as he has not sent any medical crtificate and any application for leave . He has been given proper notice under the rules and thereafter his services have been terminated.
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman that he was appointed on 17-12-1984 . He absented himself from 7-1-1992 on account the illness of his wife and thereafter his own illness . He did not get notice of4-3-1995 . When he came to join after recovery , he was told that he has been voluntarily retired on 3-4-1995 in view of the bipartite settlementdt. 8-9-1993 and para 17 -A ofthe sameBipartite Settlement . It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant remained absent for long 4 years . He absented himself on
As such , his services have been terminated after giving him due notice as per the bipartite settlement referred to above. The notice was sent to him on 04-03-1995 . Still , hedid not report and he reported on 18-08-1996 . As such , the management has given him proper opportunity . Principles of natural justice have been followed and there appears an intention of the workman applicant to abandon his job . As such , the workman is not entitled to get any relief. The law cited by the workman applicant are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case .
890
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
APPEARANCES :
The reference is replied thus :-
Complainant
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
Opponent
ORDER
The action of the management of UCO Bank in treating Sh . Gordhan Lal Phogat, Gun man/Armed Guard as Voluntarily retired from Bank services w.e.f. 3-4-95 is just and legal . The workman applicant is not liable to get any relief as prayed for.
The award is given accordingly.
Dt. 20-12-04
R.N. RAI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
का.आ. 268.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ . एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 213/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -30025/ 6/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
S.O. 268. ln pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employeers in relation to the inanagement of ONGC and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L- 30025/6/2004 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
3.The oponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable .It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
B. I. Kazi B.Sc. L.L.M. , Presiding Officer
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .
Com . C.G.L.T.A No. 213/04 In Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 167/03 In Ref. ( L.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
Thakor Shanaji Shankerji
Complainant
Dantali,
Dist: Gandhinagar .
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Versus
Opponent
GroupGeneral Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan . Ahmedabad
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order:
ORDER
Inview ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Ahmedabad.
Date: 16-09-2004
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 269.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ . एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 228/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/21/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004 S.O.269 .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employeers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L-30025/21 /2004- IR (M)] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT:
B. I. Kazi B.Sc. L.L.M. Presiding Officer Com. C.G.LT.A No. 228/04 In Reference No. C.G.LT.Α. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 182/03 In Ref. (LT.C. ) No . 139/99j
891
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ), the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .
Complainant
Parmar Sevantibhai Keshavlal , 3556/146, Vindhyachal Guj . Hou. Board, Chandkheda, Dist:Gandhinagar .
Versus
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
... Opponent
GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC. Ahmedabad Project,
Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent : Shri K.V. Gadhia
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order:
ORDER
Inview ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost.
B.I. KAZI, Presiding Officer Ahmedabad.
Date : 16-09-2004 892
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
का.आ. 270.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 227/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30025 /20 /2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and tribunal has granted the status- quo .
S.O. 270.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad (Ref. No. 227/04 ) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of ONGC and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L -30025/20/ 2004- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
B. I. KAZI B. Sc. , L. L. M. Presiding Officer:
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
Com . C.G.LT.A. No. 227/04 in Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04
[Old Com. No. 181/03 In Ref. (LT.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
Barot Vishal M.
..Complainant
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Kaaligam, Dist. Ahmedabad .
VERSUS
Opponent
Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order:
ORDER
Complainant: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Opponent : Shri K. V. Gadhia
In view of Ex . 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
ORDER
B. 1. KAZI, Presiding Officer
Ahmedabad.
Dated : 16-09-2004
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the 893
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ ० 271. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 226/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/19/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004 S.O. 271. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 .
[No. L -30025/ 19/2004- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT:
B. I. KAZI B. SC. , L. L. M. Presiding Officer:
Com . C.G.LT.A. No. 226/04 In Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 180/03 in Ref. (LT.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
....... Complainant Rajbhoi Amarbhai Mangladas
734 C, Paraswat Nagar, Jantangar, Chandkheda , Ahmedabad .
VERSUS
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B. G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo.
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
4.During the course ofproceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference.
....Opponent
GroupGeneral Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Shri K. V. Gadhia
Opponent :
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
109 G1 /2005-30
6. Thus it is clear that the opporent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order:
ORDER
Inview ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
Ahmedabad. Dated: 16-09-2004 B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 272.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी.
894
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 225/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30025/18/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम ० डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponentbeing improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint. By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and Tribunal has granted the status - quo .
S.O. 272. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 .
[No. L- 30025/18/2004- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT ATAHMEDABAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. I. KAZI B. SC. , L. L. M. Presiding Officer:
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.
Com . C.G.I.Τ.Α. No. 225/04 In Reference No. C.G.L.T.A. No. 215/04
(Old Com . No. 179/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 )
.......Complainant
RajputMeheshkumar M. , Kaligam,
Dist: Ahemedabad .
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Exs . 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Exs . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
VERSUS
GroupGeneral Manager,
....Opponent
Avani Bhavan . Ahmedabad . ONGC . Ahmedabad Project,
APPEARANCES :
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passsed the following order:
ORDER
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Opponent:
Shri K. V. Gadhia
Inview of Ex. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
Ahmedabad.
ORDER
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer
Dated: 16-09-2004
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
का०आ० 273.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी.
895
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 224/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025 /17/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी० एम० डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December, 2004 S.O. 273. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of ONGC and atheir workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L -30025/17/2004- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT ATAHMEDABAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. I. KAZI B. SC. , L. L. M. Presiding Officer:
Com . C.G.L.Τ.Α. No. 224/04 In Reference No. C.G.L.T.A. No. 215/04
(Old Com. No. 178/03 In Ref. (L.T.C. ) No. 139/99) Christian SimonTrikambhai .
Complainant 97-A Bhagawati Society. B/h. Pragati School . Jantanagar , Ahmedabad.
VERSUS
Opponent Group General Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Shri K. V. Gadhia
Opponent:
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 .He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is givento the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has nо jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed withcost.
4.Duringthe course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.GIT.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed of accordingly.
5. Lookingto the order passed in Reference CGI.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ens 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Exs, 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference.
T 6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passsed the following order:
ORDER
In view of Ex. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost.
Ahmedabad
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Dated: 16-09-2004
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2004
का०आ० .-औद्योगिक विवाद प्रधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके क कारों के यो अनुबंध 896
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 223/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30025/16/2004- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status- quo .
S.O. 274. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of O.N.G.C. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004.
[No. L -30025/ 16/ 2004- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
PRESENT:
Shri B. 1. Kazi B. Sc . , L. L. M. , Presiding Officer
Com . C.G.L.T.A. No. 223/04 In Reference No. C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
[Old Com. No. 178/03 In Ref . (L.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
Christian Simon Trikambhai .
Complainant
97 -A Bhagawati Society .
B /h . Pragati School , Jantanagar. Ahmedabad.
VERSUS
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Group General Manager,
.... Opponent
ONGC . Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .
Appearances :
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
ORDER
Shri K. V. Gadhia
Opponent
ORDER
In view of Ex. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
Ahmedabad .
Date: 16-09-2004
B. I. KAZI, Presiding Officer 1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the 897 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
complainant and for other relief.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 275.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 222/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30025/ 15/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status - quo .
S.O. 275. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of O.N.G.C. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 .
[No. L-30025/15/2004- IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workman. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT : B. I. Kazi , B. Sc . L. I. M. , Presiding Officer
4.During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i. e . Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
Com . C. G. L. T. A. No. 222/04 In Reference No. C. G. L. T. A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 177/03 , In Ref . (LT.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
Parmar Ravindra Kumar Jivanlal, Block , No. 63 , Jaybhavani Raw House,
B/h . Old Water Tank, Kalol,
...Complainant
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Versus
GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad.
Opponent
Appearances:
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order:
Complainant
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
ORDER
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
Opponent
ORDER
Inview ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
Ahmedabad.
Date: 16-09-2004
B. I. KAZI , PresidingOfficer 1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the 898
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
का.आ. 276.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 221/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30025/14/2004- आई . आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
S.O. 276. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ofthe Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L -30025/ 14/2004 - IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT: B. 1. Kazi , B. Sc . L. L. M. , Presiding Officer
4.During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .
Com . C. G. I. T. A. No. 221/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 175/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
Datania Ramesh Mathurbhai , Dantali.
...Complainant
Dist: Gandhinagar
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Versus
GroupGeneral Manager,
ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan ,
Ahmedabad
Opponent
APPEARANCES :
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order :
ORDER
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Complainant
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
Opponent
Inview of Ex. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
ORDER
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer
Ahmedabad.
Date: 16-09-2004
1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 277.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 220/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/13/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004 S.O. 277. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Govt. Indstrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L -30025/ 13 /2004 - IR (M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT : Shri B. I. Kazi B. Sc . L. L. M.. Presiding Officer
Com. C. G. I. T. A. No. 220/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 (Old Com. No. 174/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99
... Complainant Jadagirdhar Vinod Visahwanath, B- 126 , Bhagwati Society , Jantanagar, Chandkheda, Gandhinagar.
Versus
899
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and tribunal has granted the status - quo .
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
4.During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i. e . Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Opponent
GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad
APPEARANCES :
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya Complainant
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
Opponent
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions 6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I passsed the following order:
ORDER
In view ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Ahmedabad.
Date: 16-09-2004 900
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 278.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन . जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 219/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -30025/12/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004 S.O. 278. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Cent . Govt. Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad (Ref. No. 219/04 as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L-30025/ 12/2004 - IR(M) ]
B.M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD PRESENT : Shri B. 1. Kazi B. Sc . L. L. Μ.. Presiding Officer
Com . C. G. I. T. A. No. 219/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04 [Old Com. No. 173/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
...Complainant Thakor Vishnuji Chanduji , Dantali. Dist: G`nagar.
Versus
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainantand for other relief.
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint. By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status - quo .
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
4.During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference , i . e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference.
Opponent
Group General Manager ,\ ONGC . Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan. Ahmedabad
Appearances
Complainant
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
Opponent
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act, praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the 6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passsed the following order :
ORDER
In view of Ex. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
B. 1. KAZI , Presiding Officer Ahmedabad .
Date: 16-09-2004 901 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2004
is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
का.आ. 279.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 218/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-30025 /11/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December, 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work. He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intendingto terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hencehe prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
S.O. 279. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ofthe Cent. Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad (Ref. No. 218/04) as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L-30025 / 11 /2004- IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction. The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT : Shri B. I. Kazi B. Sc . L. L. M..
Presiding Officer
4.During the course ofproceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 ( Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed off accordingly .
Com . C. G. I. T. A. No. 218/04 In Reference No. C. G. I. T. A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 172/03 In Ref. (I.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
..Complainant
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
Parmar Jitendra Chhanalal , 359/1978 Subhas Nagar Guj . Hou. Board , Chandkheda Ta. Dist . Ginagar .
Versus
Opponent
Group General Manager, ONGC. Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passsed the following order:
APPEARANCES :
ORDER
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Complainant
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
In view ofEx . 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
Opponent
ORDER
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer
Ahmedabad .
Date: 16-09-2004
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions
109 Gl /2005-31 902
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 / MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2004
is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
का.आ. 280.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 217/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30025/10/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant. Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary. Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status - quo.
S.O. 280. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ofthe Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad (Ref. No. 217/04) as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the er loyers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 .
[No. L -30025/10/2004 -IR(M) ]
B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable. It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned. workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is ... prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
Present : B. I. Kazi B. Sc . L. L. M ..
PresidingOfficer
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex . 11 and it was submitted that in view of order passed in Main Reference, i . e . Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
Com. G. G. L. T. A. No. 217/04 In Reference No. C. G. L T. A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 171/03 In Ref. (L.T.C.) No. 139/99 ]
Complainant
Barot Valjibhai Somabhai ,
Ambicangar Nr . Naroda Railway Station, ...
Naroda, Ahmedabad .
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex. 46 and 48, the Tribunal ha: granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the presen complainant and direction was issued that there should notbe change in the service conditions of the complainan till the final disposal of that reference .
Versus
Opponent
GroupGeneral Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law. Hence I passsed the following order :
Appearances
ORDER
Complainant
: Shri Hemal K. Acharya
: Shri K.V. Gadhia
Opponent
In view of Ex . 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
ORDER
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer
Ahmedabad.
Date : 16-09-2004
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his service conditions [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
903
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 281.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 214/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025 /7 / 2004-आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December, 2004.
S.O. 281. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L -30025/7/2004-IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. I. KAZI, B. Sc . , L. L. M. , Presiding Officer Com . C.G.LT.A. No. 214/04 in Reference No. C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 168/03 In Ref. (L.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ] 2. The brief facts of the complaint is that he is working since last 10 ycars as a helper in D.B.G. department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal. Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence heprayed the relief as per pera 10 of the complaint . By Ex. 2 the complainant has filed and ad - interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen . Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .
4.During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous. The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
.......Complaintant
Parmar Arvindhbhai Ranchhodhbhai , 174, Tapovan Nagar,
Motera Road, Sabarmati , Ahmedabad.
Versus
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex. 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant tillthe final disposal of that reference .
Opponemt
GroupGeneral Manager, ONGC, Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya Opponent: Shri K. V. Gadhia
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should- not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order :
ORDER
Inview ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Ahmedabad.
Date: 16-09-2004
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 282.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. केप्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निय' कों और उनके कर्मकारों के 904
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 215/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/ 8/2004- आई. आर. ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December, 2004 S.O. 282. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, (Ref. No. 215/04 ) Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 .
[No. L -30025/ 8 /2004- IR (M) ]
B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. I. KAZI , B. Sc. , L. L. M. PresidingOfficer Com . C.G.LT.A. No. 215/04 In Reference No. C.G.L.T.A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 169/03 in Ref. (L.T.C. ) No. 139/99 ]
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act ofthe opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed and ad- interim application and tribunal has granted the status -quo .
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex. 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable. Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost .
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99) , the present complaint is. become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
Complainant
Anil kumar Omprakash Sharma, 38 , Devdas Nagar Society , "D " Cabin , Sabarmati , Ahmedabad- 5.
VERSUS
....Opponent Group General Manager, ONGC , Ahmedabad Project, Avani Bhavan, Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Shri K. V. Gadhia
Opponent:
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B. G. department. The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent 5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Ex . 46 and 48 , the Tribunal has granted the application Ex . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference .
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent . Hence thus complaint does not survive in law . Hence I passed the following order:
ORDER
In view ofEx. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off. No order as to cost .
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Ahmedabad . Date : 16-09-2004
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 283.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संवद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 216/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30025/9/2004- आई आर ( विविध ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
905
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004 S.O. 283. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004
[No. L -30025/ 9/2004- IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. I. KAZI B. Sc. , L. L. M. Presiding Officer:
Com . C.G.I.T.A. No. 216/04 In Reference No. C.G.L.T.A. No. 215/04
[Old Com . No. 170/03 In Ref . (LT.C. ) No. 139/99 ] Datania Rajeshbhai Shivabhai ,
3. The opponent has submitted the Written Statement by Ex . 10. The brief facts are that the complaint is not maintainable at law and Hon'ble Tribunal has no jurisdiction . The opponent has not contravened any provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and hence this complaint is not maintainable . It is also submitted that the complainant is not a concerned workmen. Thus the complaint is not tenable . Hence it is prayed that the complaint is required to be dismissed with cost.
4. During the course of proceedings the complainant had submitted Ex. 11 and it was submitted that in view of orderpassed in Main Reference , i.e. Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 (Old No. 139/99 ) , the present complaint is become infructuous . The complaint may be disposed off accordingly.
5. Looking to the order passed in Reference C.G.I.T.A. No. 215/04 as per Exs . 46 and 48, the Tribunal has granted the application Exs . 46 and 48 of the present complainant and direction was issued that there should not be change in the service conditions of the complainant till the final disposal of that reference.
Complainant
Dantali, Dist . G'nagar
VERSUS
....Opponent Group General Manager , ONGC, Ahmedabad Project , Avani Bhavan , Ahmedabad .
APPEARANCES :
Complainant : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
Shri K. V. Gadhia
Opponent :
ORDER
1. The complainant has filed this complaint Under Section 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act , praying that the act of the opponent changing his Service conditions is in violation of Section 33 and it is also prayed that the opponent should not interfere with the working of the complainant and for other relief.
2. The brief facts of the complainant is that he is working since last 10 years as a helper in D.B.G. Department . The complainant and other workmen has raised the dispute which is pending before the Industrial Tribunal being reference I.T.C. No. 139/99 . He is doing the permanent work . He is denied the wages which is given to the permanent employee of the O.N.G.C. The opponent is trying to change the service conditions and intending to terminate the services of complainant . Thus the act of the opponent being improper and illegal . Before terminating the services the permission of the Tribunal is necessary . Hence he prayed the relief as per para 10 of the complaint . By Ex . 2 the complainant has filed an ad- interim application and Tribunal has granted the status quo .
6. Thus it is clear that the opponent has not committed any breach of Section 33A of the Industrial Dispute Act and looking to the facts of the complaint there is no violation of Section 33 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act by the opponent. Hence , thus , complaint does not survive in law . Hence , I passsed the following order:
ORDER
Inview of Ex. 11 the complainant is hereby disposed off . No order as to cost .
B. I. KAZI , PresidingOfficer Ahmedabad . Date: 16-09-2004
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 284.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एम. एम. टी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय , भीलवाड़ा के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-29011 /78/2001- आई आर ( विविध ) ] बी. एम . डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th December , 2004 S.O. 284. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Industrial Tribunal , Bhilwara as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation 906
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
to the management MMTC Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 .
[No. L - 29011/ 78/2001 - IR(M)] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
अनुबन्ध
औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण, भीलवाड़ा ( राज. ) पीठासीन अधिकारी-एम. एल. शर्मा-प्रथम, आर. एच. जे.
एस. औद्योगिक विवाद प्रकरण संख्या: 2/02 सेक्रेट्री, इलैक्ट्रॉनिक ट्रेड यूनियन, एम. एम. टी. सी. लि. मिटको, एफ-96 से 105 , रिको एरिया , भीलवाड़ा ।
आवेदक
बनाम
रीजनल मेनेजर , एमएमटीसी लि. , एफ- 96-105 , रिको एरिया, भीलवाड़ा ।
अनावेदक
उपस्थितः
श्री आर. सी. वेचाणी, अधिवक्ता- आवेदक की ओर से । श्री जी. एल. जैन, अधिवक्ता- अनावेदक की ओर से ।
पंचाट
दिनांक19.11.04
1. केन्द्र सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या -29011 /78/ 2001 - आईआर ( एम ) दिनांक 6-2-2001 के द्वारा औद्योगिक विवाद अधि. 1947 ( तत्पश्चात् अधि. 1947 से सम्बोधित ) की धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( ग ) के तहत निम्नलिखित विवाद इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णयार्थ प्रेषित किया गया :-
" क्या क्षेत्रीय प्रबंधक, एम . एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा द्वारा कर्मचारियों को वर्ष 1992 से आउट फिट एलाउन्स का भुगतान रु. 450.00 प्रतिवर्ष प्रति कर्मचारी के हिसाब से नहीं करना उचित एवं सहीहै ? यदि नहीं, तो यूनियन किस राहत का अधिकारी है ? " 2. उपर्युक्तानुसार विवाद दिनांक 18-3-02 को प्राप्त होने पर क्रम संख्या 2/02 पर दर्ज हुआ तथा पक्षकारान को सूचित किया गया । 3. दिनांक 2-12-02 को प्रस्तुत स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम के मुताबिक आवेदक यूनियन पंजीकृत है तथा अनावेदक कंपनी से मान्यता प्राप्त है । आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण पूर्व में माईकाट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया लि. के कर्मचारीगण थे । मिटको रुग्ण इकाई होने की वजह से मामला बी.आई.एफ. आर. में रेफर किया गया तथा दिनांक 1-4-95 से मिटको कंपनी एम.एम.टी.टी. में विलय हो गई- तत्पश्चात् मिटको में कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण की तैनाती अभ्रक प्रभाग में की गई । अभ्रक प्रभाग एम.एम.टी.सी. के अन्य विभाग/प्रभाग की तरह एक शाखा है । मिटको के पूर्व कर्मचारीगण को एम.एम.टी.सी. में कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण के समान वेतन परिलाभ अदा नहीं किया जा रहा है । पूर्व कंपनी मिटको के कार्यालय आदेश क्रमांक 7165 दिनांक 3-3-89 के द्वारा भीलवाड़ा कार्यालय को फील्ड स्टेशन घोषित किया गया तथा फील्ड स्टेशन में
ne
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण को 450रु . प्रति वर्ष प्रति कर्मचारी आउट फिट एलाउन्सदेय होता है । यह एलाउन्स वेतन का हिस्सा है । वर्ष 1991 तक मिटको कर्मचारीगण को प्रति कर्मचारी 450रु. प्रति वर्ष आउट फिट एलाउन्स अदा किया गया लेकिन वर्ष 1992 से इस एलाउन्स की अदायगी आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण को नहीं की जा रही है । वित्तीय संकट का बहाना बना कर प्रबंधन इस एलाउन्स का भुगतान नहीं कर रहा है , जबकिस्वैच्छिक सेवा निवृति योजना के तहत सेवा निवृत कर्मचारीगण को आउट फिट एलाउन्स का भुगतान किया गया है । वर्ष 1992 से वर्ष 2000 तक प्रति कर्मचारी 400 रु . प्रति वर्ष की दर से आउट फिट एलाउन्स की राशि 4950 रु. होती है । यही नहीं जिन कर्मचारीगण को आउट फिट एलाउन्स देय होता है उनको मकान किराया भत्ता की 5 प्रतिशत राशि कम अदा की जाती है । आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण को आउट फिट एलाउन्स की राशि भी अदा नहीं की जा रही है तथा उन्हें मकान किराया भत्ता के रूप में भी 5 प्रतिशत राशि कम अदा की जा रही है जो सर्वथा अनुचित है । यूनियन ने निवदेन किया कि भीलवाड़ाफील्ड स्टेशन पर कार्यरत यूनियन के सदस्यगण को वर्ष 1992 से प्रति कर्मचारी 450 रु. प्रति वर्ष की दर से आउट फिट एलाउन्स के रूप में ब्याज सहित दिलायेजायें ।
4. दिनांक 9-5-03 को प्रस्तुत जवाब में उल्लेख किया गया कि पूर्ववर्ती मिटको को एम.एम.टी.सी. में इस शर्त के तहत विलय किया गया था कि विलय किये गये तथाकथित कर्मचारी विलयन की तारीख पर लागू होने वाली सेवा शर्तों तथा वेतनमान के अंतर्गत कार्य करेंगे तथा पूर्ववर्ती मिटको के कर्मचारी एम.एम.टी.सी. के वेतनमानों के लिए आंदोलन नहीं करेंगे । भीलवाड़ा कार्यालय को फील्ड स्टेशन घोषित किये जाने से आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्य आउट फिट एलाउन्स के अधिकारी नहीं हो जाते । वर्तमान में इकाई में कोई उत्पादन नहीं हो रहा है तथा वर्ष 2000-2001 व 2001-2002 में माईका प्रभाग में हानि हुई है। पूर्ण आय नहीं होने की स्थिति में आउट फिट भत्ता प्रदान नहीं किया जासकता । विलय योजना के तहत वेतनमान संशोधन का कोई प्रावधान नहीं था। समान कार्य के लिए समान वेतन के सिद्धांत को आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण के संबंध में लागू नहीं किया जा सकता । 5. स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम के समर्थन में विरेन्द्र सिंह , अध्यक्ष आवेदक यूनियन का शपथपत्र पेश हुआ । उससे अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से जिरह हुई । जवाब के समर्थन में अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से कोई साक्ष्य पेश नहीं हुई ।
6. बहस अंतिम उभयपक्ष सुनी । उभयपक्ष की तरफ से लिखित बहस भी पेश हुई । पत्रावली का ध्यानपूर्वक अवलोकन किया । 7. आवेदक यूनियन की तरफ से जाहिर, किया गया कि पूर्व मिटको कंपनी का विलय अनावेदन कंपनी एम.एम.टी.सी. में होने के पश्चात् आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण एम.एम.टी.सी. में कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण के समान वेतन व परिलाभ प्राप्त करने के अधिकारी हैं । आदेश दिनांक 3-3-89 के द्वारा भीलवाड़ा कार्यालय को फील्ड स्टेशन घोषित किया गया तथा तब से पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण को भी 400 रु. प्रति कर्मचारी प्रति वर्ष की दर से आउट फिट एलाउन्स अदा होता रहा है, लेकिन वर्ष 1992 से आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण को यह भत्ता अदा नहीं किया जा रहा है । वर्ष 1992 से 2002 तक 450 रु. प्रति
1 907 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
कर्मचारी प्रति वर्ष की दर से आउट फिट भत्ता की कुल राशि 4950 रु. होती है । अनावेदक कंपनी विज्ञापन, कलेंडर , कार्ड आदि पर लाखों रुपये खर्च करती है तथा आउट फिट भत्ता की कुछ राशि अदा करने के लिए आर्थिक हानि का बहाना बना रही है । अनावेदक कंपनी ने आवेदक यूनियन की तरफ से पेश किये गये गवाह तथा दस्तावेजात के खंडन में कोई साक्ष्य पेश नहीं की है । अनावेदक कंपनी ने वर्ष 1992 से आउट फिट भत्ता के रूप में राशि अदा नहीं की, जबकि बी.आई. एफ. आर. के पेकेज में दो लाख रुपये की राशि आउटफिट भत्ता के रूप में दर्शाई गई है ।
8. अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से बतलाया गया कि विवाद उचित पक्षकार के अभाव में पोषणीय नहीं है तथा विवाद के संबंध में निर्णय लेने के लिए पंजिकृत कार्यालय ही सक्षम है ।
एम.एम.टी.सी. के भीलवाड़ा स्थित प्रबंधन कार्यालय को प्रेषित किया गया तथा विवाद भी भीलवाड़ा स्थित प्रबंधन कार्यालयआवेदक यूनियन के मध्य उत्पन्न हुआ- जिस स्थिति में एम.एम.टी.सी. को जरिये रीजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा पक्षकार बनाया जाना किसी तरह से अनुचित नहीं कहा जा सकता । अधि. 1947 की धारा 2 ( जी ) के तहत " नियोजक " को परिभाषित किया गया है जिसमें स्थानीय प्राधिकारी या उसकी तरफ संचालित उद्योग के संबंध में उस प्राधिकारी के मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी को नियोजक माना गया है । एम.एम.टी.सी. की तरफ संचालित उद्योग में भीलवाड़ा स्थित कार्यालय में रीजनल मेनेजर मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी होना प्रतीत होता है । यदि किसी कार्य के लिए उच्चाधिकारियों कीस्वीकृति आवश्यक है तो वह स्वीकृति संबंधित अधिकारी यानि रीजनल मैनेजर द्वारा प्राप्त किया जाना संभव है । उच्चाधिकारियों द्वारा इस तरह की स्वीकृति प्रदान नहीं किये जाने की स्थिति में संबंधित अधिकारी कथित कार्य से इन्कार किया जा सकता है , लेकिन विचाराधीन मामलेमें इस तरह का प्रसंग नहीं है क्योंकि एम.एम.टी.सी. के रीजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा द्वारा इस तरह का कोई तर्क पेश नहीं किया गया है कि उसने किसी तरह की स्वीकृति के लिए प्रधान कार्यालय या उच्च अधिकारियों को लिखा । भीलवाड़ा स्थित प्रबंधन कार्यालय से आवेदक यूनियन का विवाद उत्पन्न होने की स्थिति में आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा भीलवाड़ा स्थित कार्यालय के रीजनल मैनेजर को स्वाभाविक तौर पर पक्षकार बनाया गया जिस प्रयोजनार्थ कंपनी के किसी सर्टिफिकेट आफ इनकार्पोरेशन को पेश किये जाने की आवश्यकता नहीं थी । यदि इस संबंध में किसी सर्टिफिकेट आफ इनकार्पोरेशन की आवश्यकता थी तो वह अनावेदक कंपनी द्वारा पेश किया जाना संभव था । सर्टिफिकेट आफ इनकार्पोरेशन के संबंध में अनावेदक कंपनी की आपत्ति निरर्थक है । इसके अलावा अधि. 1947 के तहत समुचित सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित विवाद का अभिनिर्धारण अधि. 1947 तथा इसके तहत बने नियमों के तहत होता है । इस तरह के विवाद के अभिनिर्धारण के लिए पक्षकार संयोजन केसंबंध में दीवानी प्रक्रिया संहिता के तहत प्रावधान प्रभावी नहीं होते हैं तथा विवाद अभिनिर्धारण के लिए श्रमिक पक्ष एवं नियोजकपक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व पर्याप्त है । विचाराधीन मामले में श्रमिक पक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा किया गया है तथा नियोजक पक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व एम. एम टी. सी . के रीजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा द्वारा किया गया है । यह सही है तथा आवेदक यूनियन के अध्यक्ष विरेन्द्र सिंह ने भी जिरह में स्वीकार किया कि " यह सही है कि इस स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम की विषय वस्तुबाबत निर्णय लेने व उसे क्रियान्वयन करने का अधिकार हैडआफिस को है " लेकिन अनावेदक कंपनी का भीलवाड़ा स्थित रीजनल मैनेजर कार्यालय अनावेदक कंपनी के प्रबंधन का हिस्सा है तथा अनावेदक कंपनी का प्रबंधन नियोजक पक्ष है । केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित रेफरेन्सके शुरू में ही उल्लेख हैकि- WHEREAS the Central Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of The Regional Manager MMTC Limited' and their workmen in respect of the mattere specified in the Schedule hereto annexed .; इस उल्लेख में प्रयुक्त शब्द " एम्पलॉयर्स " बहुवचन है- जिसमें मेरी राय में अनावेदक कंपनी का रीजनल कार्यालय भीलवाड़ा शामिल है तथा यदि रीजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा की दृष्टि में यह विवाद 9. अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से लिखित बहस के माध्यम से जो एक मात्र तर्क पेश हुआ है वह तर्क यह है कि एम.एम.टी.सी. जरिये रिजनल मेनेजर, भीलवाड़ा इस विवाद में उचित पक्षकार नहीं है तथा उचित पक्षकार के अभाव में यह विवाद पोषणीय नहीं है । यह स्वीकृत तथ्य है कि पूर्व माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन ( मिटको ) जो वर्तमान में माईका डिवीजन के रूप में जानी जाती है, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. की सब्सीडरी थी तथा मिटको रुग्ण इकाई होने की वजह से 1992 में बी.आई.एफ.आर. के रेफर हुई तथा बाद में मिटको का विलय एम.एम.टी.सी. में हो गया । अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से प्रस्तुत जवाब (हिन्दी अनुवाद ) के शुरू में ही उल्लेख है कि " पूर्ववर्ती मिटको को एक बीमार इकाई घोषित किया गया था तथा बी.आई.एफ.आर. में भेजा गया था । बी.आई.एफ.आर. की संस्तुति पर दिनांक 1-4-94 से इसका विलयन एम.एम.टी.सी. में कर दिया गया था और इस समय यह एम.एम.टी.सी के माईका प्रभाग के रूप में कार्य कर रही है । वेतन तथा भत्तों के संबंध में लगाये गये आरोप स्वीकार नहीं किये जाते हैं । पूर्ववर्ती मिटको को एम.एम.टी.सी में इस शर्त के साथ विलय किया गया था कि एम.एम.टी.सी में विलय किये गये तथाकथित कर्मचारी विलयन की तारीख पर लागू होने वाली सेवा शर्तों तथा वेतनमान के अंतर्गत कार्य करेंगे तथा पूर्ववर्ती मिटको के कर्मचारी एम. एम.टी.सी के वेतनमानों के लिए आंदोलन नहीं करेंगे । इस तरह से पूर्व मिटको, आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण जिसके कर्मचारीगण हैं , का विलय दी मिनरल एंड मेटलस ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया ( एम.एम.टी.सी. ) में हो गया तथा इस एम.एम.टी.सी. का रिंजनल कार्यालय भीलवाड़ा में स्थित है । आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण , जो कि पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण थे तथा मिटको का विलय एम.एम.टी.सी. में होने से वर्तमान में वे एम.एम.टी.सी. कीमाईका डिवीजन, भीलवाड़ा में कार्यरत होने बतलाये गये हैं । आवेदक यूनियन के कथानुसार भीलवाड़ा में माईका डिवीजन में कार्यरत पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण के कार्य तथा भीलवाड़ा में ही एम.एम.टी.सी. में कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण के कार्य में कोई भिन्नता नहीं है , जबकि उनको देय वेतन व परिलाभों में भिन्नता है । इस तरह की स्थिति में वेतन व परिलाभ में भिन्नता से संबंधित विवाद एम.एम.टी.सी. की भीलवाड़ा स्थित कार्यालय के प्रबंधन एवं आवेदक यूनियन के मध्य होना स्वाभाविक है- परिणामतः भीलवाड़ा स्थित एम.एम.टी.सी. का कार्यालय विचाराधीन विवाद में अनुचित पक्षकार नहीं है । आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा मांग पत्र 908
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] मुख्यालय से संबंधित था तो मुख्यालय द्वारा विवादको कंटेस्ट किये जाने में कोई बाधा नहीं थी । न्यायिक विनिश्चय मैं बक्षी स्टील लि. बनाम राज. राज्य आर. एल. आर. 2004 ( 1 ) पेज 755 में माननीय राज . उच्च न्यायालय द्वारा अभिनिर्धारित किया गया कि टेक्नीकल आधार पर क्लेम को खारिज नहीं किया जाना चाहिये । विचाराधीन मामले में भी एम. एम. टी सी.लि. को मुख्य प्रबंधन के जरिये पक्षकार नहीं बनाया जाकर रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा के जरिये पक्षकार बनाए जाने मात्र आधार पर यह विवाद खारिज किया जाना उचित प्रतीत नहीं होता ।
2 ( आर आर ) में परिभाषित मजदूरी ( वेजेज ) की तारीफ में आता है तथा धनाभाव की वजह से संबंधित श्रमिक को इस तरह की राशि से वंचित नहीं किया जा सकता । अधि. 1947 की धारा 25 ( एफ एफ एफ) में निहित प्रावधान के मुताबिक वित्तीय परेशानियों जिसमें आर्थिक हानि शामिल है , को उन अएवाएडेबल स्मस्टान्सेज जो नियोजक के नियंत्रण में के बाहर हो नहीं माना गया है । इस तरह से मेरी राय में आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण जो कार्यालय आदेश दिनांक 3-3-89 अनेक्सर 1 व कार्यालय आदेश दिनांक 27-12-91 अनेक्सर 2 व प्रदर्श 6 की परिधि में आता है , को वर्ष 1992 के आउटफिट एलाउन्स का भुगतान 450 रु. प्रति वर्ष प्रति कर्मचारी के हिसाब से नहीं करना उचित एवं सही नहीं है । "
11. उपर्युक्त विवेचन के आधार पर केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित विवाद निम्न तरह से निर्णित किया जाता है:-
क्षेत्रीय प्रबंधक, एम. एम. टी सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा द्वारा कर्मचारियों को वर्ष 1992 से आउट फिट एलाउन्स का भुगतान 450 रु. प्रतिवर्ष प्रति कर्मचारी के हिसाब से नहीं करना उचित एवं सही नहीं है । आवेदक युनियन के सदस्यगण/कर्मचारीगण, जो कार्यालय आदेश दिनांक 3-3-89 व 27-12-91 की परिधि मेंआते हैं , 450 रु. प्रति वर्ष प्रति कर्मचारी की दर से आउट फिट एलाऊन्स के रूप में बकाया राशि अनावेदक कंपनी से प्राप्त करने के अधिकारी हैं ।
उपर्युक्तानुसार पंचाट जारी किया जाता है ।
एम. एल. शर्मा- प्रथम, न्यायाधीश
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 285.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एम. एम. टी. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय भीलवाड़ा के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-29011 /79/2001- आई. आर. ( एम ) ]
बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 27th December, 2004
S.O. 285. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Labour Court, Bhilwara as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of MMTC Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2004 10. पत्रावली के संलग्न कार्यालय आदेश दिनांक 27-12-91 अनेक्सर दो व प्रदर्श 6 के क्रम सं . 8 व 8.1 पर इस आशय का उल्लेख है कि OUTFIT ALLOWANCE :- The existing rate ofoutfit Allowance of Rs . 450/- per annum payble to the field Staff and Ministerial staff working in field as a compensation for comperatively repid wear and tear of clothes shall remain unchanged " यह आदेश माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. पी. एंड ए डिवीजन द्वारा जारी किया गया है । कार्यालय आदेश दिनांक 3-3-89 अनक्सर एक भी माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया के चीफ मैनेजर पी. एंड ए के द्वारा जारी हुआ है तथा इस आदेश के तहत भीलवाड़ा सहित कुछ शहरों कोफील्ड स्टेशन घोषित किया गया है । इस आदेश में यह भी उल्लेख किया गया है कि फील्ड स्टेशन पर कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण को देय लाभ भीलवाड़ा स्थित फील्ड स्टेशन पर कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण को भी देय होंगे । इन दोनों आदेशों से स्पष्ट है कि पूर्व मिटको के फील्ड स्टाफ व मिनीस्ट्रीयल स्टाफ, जो भीलवाड़ा फील्ड स्टेशन पर कार्यरत थे को 450 रु. प्रति वर्ष की दर से आउट फिट भत्ता देय था । यूनियन की तरफ से जाहिर किया गया है कि वर्ष 91 तक पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण को आउट फिट भत्ता राशि अदा की गई लेकिन वर्ष 1992 से इस राशि की अदायगी नहीं की जा रही है । इस संबंध में आवेदक यूनियन की तरह से पेश किये गये गवाह विरेन्द्र सिंह के शपथपत्र का कोई खंडन अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से नहीं हुआ है । अनावेक कंपनी द्वारा सहायक श्रम आयुक्त ( केन्द्रीय ) , अजमेर को प्रेषित पत्र दिनांक 13-4-01 प्रदर्श 11 में उल्लेख है कि " आपके पत्र सं. ऐजे /50 ( 52) /2000 दिनांक 9-4-2001 के संदर्भ में निवेदन है किनिधि की कमी एवं वित्तीय संकट के कारण वर्ष 1992 से कर्मचारियों को आउट फिट भत्ते का भुगतान नहीं किया जा सका है । " " माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया के दो कर्मचारीगण नरेन्द्र सिंह, चालक व मुक्तेश्वर तिवारी , वाचमैन की क्रमशः 6-5-96 व 5-2-96 को सेवा निवृति पर आउट फिट भत्ता के रूप में वर्ष 1992-93 से सेवा निवृत्ति तक राशि अदा किये जाने का उल्लेख है लाईबिलिटी से संबंधित विवरण प्रदर्श 14 में भी आउट फिट भत्ता के रूप में दो लाख रुपये की राशि जुलाई 88 से मार्च 94 तक की अवधि की दर्शाई हुई है । माईका ट्रेडिग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया लि. द्वारा ही जारी कार्यालय आदेश सं . 48 दिनांक 11-3-89 प्रदर्श 15 से स्पष्ट है कि फील्ड स्टेशन पर कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण को देय भत्तों के परिपेक्ष्य में उन्हें मकान किराया भत्ता के रूप में 25 % के स्थान पर 20 % भत्ता ही देय होता है । मामले की परिस्थित्तियों में, मेरी राय में, फील्ड स्टेशन पर कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण को देय आऊटफिट भत्ता अधि. 1947 की धारा
[No. L -29011/ 79/2001 - IR(M) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
909 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
अनुबंध
औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण, भीलवाड़ा , ( राजस्थान )
पीठासीन अधिकारी एम. एल. शर्मा , प्रथम, आर. एच. जे.
एस.
औद्योगिक विवाद प्रकरण संख्या: 1/02
विवाद मध्य:
सेक्रेटरी , इलैक्ट्रोनिक ट्रेड यूनियन,
एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. ,
मिटको, एम -96 से 105 ,
आवेदक
रिको एरिया, भीलवाड़ा
बनाम
रिजनल मैनेजर,
एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. ,
एफ-96-105,
समय-समय पर लिये गये निर्णय तथा वेतनमान आदि मिटको के कर्मचारीगण भी समान रूप से लागू होते थे । अनावेदक कंपनी के अभ्रक प्रभाग में कार्यरत श्रमिकगण का कार्य अन्य विभागों में कार्यस्त कर्मचारीगण के कार्य के समान है। समान कार्य के लिए समान वेतन देय होता है , लेकिन मिटको कंपनी एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. अनावेदक कंपनी में विलय होने के पश्चात् मिटको कम्पनी के कर्मचारीगण को अनावेदक कंपनी के कर्मचारीगण के समान वेतन व परिलाभ नहीं दिए जा रहे हैं । स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम के पैरा सं. 7 के मुताबिक श्रमिकगण का वेतन पुनरीक्षण दिनांक 1-7-88 से तथा कर्मचारियों का वेतन पुरीक्षण दिनांक 1-11-92, से एवं अधिकारियों का वेतन पुनरीक्षण दिनांक1-1-92 से नहीं किया है । आवेदक यूनियन ने रेफरेंस में वर्णित मांग पत्र विपक्षी नियोजक को प्रस्तुत किया । मांगों का विवरण क्लेम के पैरा सं. 10 में असे द तक है । मांग पत्र में वर्णित मांगे उचित हैं तथा स्वीकार किये जाने योग्य है । आवेदक यूनियन ने निवेदन किया कि आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा प्रस्तुत मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए वैध व उचित मानते हुए मांग में वर्णनानुसार वेतनमान व लाभ आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण को प्रदत्त किये जाये ।
अनावेदक
रिको एरिया, भीलवाड़ा
उपस्थित
आवेदक की ओर से
श्री आर. सी. चैचाणी , अधिवक्ता
अनावेदक की ओर से
श्री जी. एल. जैन, अधिवक्ता
पंचाट
दिनांक 19-11-2004
1. केन्द्र सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या: एल- 29011/79/2001- आईआर ( एम ) दिनांक 8-2-2002 के द्वारा औद्योगिक विवाद अधि. 1947 ( तत्पश्चात्अधि. 1947 से सम्बोधित) की धारा 10( 1 ) ( ग ) के तहत निम्नलिखित विवाद इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णयार्थ प्रेषित किया :-
" क्याइलैक्ट्रोनिक ट्रेड यूनियन, भीलवाड़ा द्वारा मांग पत्र एनेक्जर "ए" प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा को प्रेषित करना उचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो यूनियन किस राहत का अधिकारी है ? "
2. उपर्युक्तानुसार विवाद दिनांक 18-3-02 को प्राप्त होने पर क्रम संख्या 1/02 पर दर्ज हुआ तथा पक्षकारान को सूचित किया गया ।
4. दिनांक 9-5-03 को प्रस्तुत जवाब (हिन्दी अनुवाद ) के मुताबिक मिटको वर्ष 1987-88 से लगातार घाटे में चल रही है तथा 1991-92 में कम्पनी का नेटवर्क पूर्णतया समाप्त हो गया । बी.आई.एफ.आर. द्वारा अनुमोदित विलय योजना के मुताबिक माईका डिवीजन के कर्मचारियों को योजना में निर्धारित अधिकतम संख्या तक ही सीमित रखा जायेगा तथा उनकी सेवा शर्तें पूर्ववत रहेगी जैसे कि विलय की तिथि से पूर्व थी। पूर्व मिटको के विभिन्न श्रेणी के कर्मचारीगण के वेतनमान में संशोधन का विवरण जवाब के पैरा सं. 4 में अंकित किया गया। विलय योजना में वेतन संशोधन का कोई प्रावधान नहीं था । एम.एम.टी.सी. के कर्मचारीगण के लिए पिछला वेतन समझौता दिनांक 4-8-95 को हुआ था । समझौते की अवधि दिनांक 1-11-92 से 31-10-97 तक 5 वर्ष की थी । एम.एम.टी.सी. कर्मचारी संघों की फेडरेशन ने दिनांक 8-1-98 को नया मांग पत्र प्रस्तुत किया तथा एम.एम.टी.सी. के कर्मचारीगण के वेतन संशोधन के संबंध में नये समझौते ज्ञापन पर हस्ताक्षर हुए । माईका डिवीजन के स्टाफ कर्मचारी केडर को वेतन पूर्व समझौता दिनांक 5-10-91 के अनुरुप देय है । दिनांक 5-10-91 के पश्चात् कोई समझौता नहीं हुआ । बी.आई.एफ.आर. की सिफारिश के बाद पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण परसेवा शर्तों तथा वेतनमान पूर्व मिटको वाले लागू होते हैं तथा वाणिज्य मंत्रालय में यह शर्त रखी गई थी कि मिटको कर्मचारीगण एम.एम.टी.सी. के वेतनमान की मांग नहीं करेंगे । समान कार्य के लिए समान वेतन का सिद्धांत आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण के संबंध में लागू नहीं होता । आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा समान वेतनमान व अन्य परिलाभ के संबंध में की गई मांग उचित नहीं है । अनावेदक कंपनी ने बी.आई.एफ.आर. के प्रावधानों के अनुसार कार्य किया है ।
5. क्लेम के समर्थन में विरेन्द्र सिंह, अध्यक्ष यूनियन का शपथपत्र पेश हुआ । उससे अनावेदक कम्पनी की तरफ से जिरह हुई । जवाब के समर्थन में कोई साक्ष्य पेश नहीं हुई ।
3.दिनांक 2-12-02 को प्रस्तुत स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम के मुताबिक आवेदक यूनियन पंजीकृत है तथा अनावेदक कंपनी से मान्यता प्राप्त है । आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण पूर्व में अनावेदक कंपनी की शाखा कंपनी माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया लि. , जिसे संक्षेप में मिटको कहा जाता है, के अधीन कार्यरत थे । मिटको रुग्ण इकाई घोषित होने से बी. आई. एफ. आर. में मामला रेफर हुआ तथा बी. आई. एफ. आर. एवं भारत सरकार के आदेश के तहत इसे एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , में दिनांक 1-4-95 को विलय कर दिया गया । विलय के पश्चात् मिटको में कार्यरत श्रमिकगण की तैनाती एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के अभ्रक प्रभाग में की गई । यह प्रभाग एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के अन्य विभागों/प्रभागों की तरह एक शाखाहै । मिटको के श्रमिकगण अभ्रक प्रभाग के श्रमिकगण होते हुए भी उन्हें एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. में कार्यरत श्रमिकगण के समान वेतन व परिलाभ का भुगतान नहीं किया जा रहा है । पूर्ववर्ती मिटको कंपनी एम.एम.टी.सी. कंपनी की सब्सीडरी कंपनी के रूप में कार्यरत तथा एम.एम.टी.सी. में
6. बहस अंतिम उभयपक्ष सुनी । उभयपक्ष की तरफ से लिखित बहस भी पेश हुई । पत्रावली का ध्यानपूर्वक अवलोकन किया । 109 G1/2005-32 910
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
7. आवेदक यूनियन की तरफ से जाहिर किया गया कि आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण समान कार्य के लिए समान वेतन के सिद्धांत के आधार पर अनावेदक कंपनी में कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण को प्रदत्त वेतन एवं परिलाभ के समान वेतन एवं परिलाभ प्राप्त करने के अधिकारी हैं । मिटको काविलय एम.एम.टी.सी. में होने के पश्चात् पूर्व में मिटको के कर्मचारीगण का वेतनमान में कोई संशोधन नहीं किया गया तथा पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण एवं अनावेदक कम्पनी के कर्मचारीगण के कार्य में कोई भिन्नता नहीं है । इस संबंध में आवेदक यूनियन ने मांग पत्र प्रेषित किया था जो उचित व स्वीकार किये जाने योग्य है । आवेदक यूनियन की तरफ से पेश की गई साक्ष्य का कोई खंडन अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से नहीं हुआहै । अनावेदक कंपनी को नियमानुसार पक्षकार बनाया गया है । आवेदक यूनियन केसदस्यगण मांग पत्र में वर्णानुसार वेतनमान व अन्य लाभ प्राप्त करने के अधिकारी हैं ।
8. अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से जाहिर किया गया कि आवेदक यूनियन ने एम.एम.टी.सी. को जरिये रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा पक्षकार बनया है , जबकि रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा इस विवाद में उचित पक्षकार नहीं है । रेफरेन्स में यह तय होना है कि क्या प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. , भीलवाड़ाप्रोपर पक्षकार है । उचित पक्षकार के संबंध में अनावेदक कंपनी का सर्टिफिकेट इन कार्पोरेशन पेश किया जाना आवश्यक था-जिससे स्पष्ट हो पाता कि इस विवाद में उचित पक्षकार कौन है । उचित पक्षकार के अभाव में यह रेफरेन्स/विवाद पोषणीय नहीं है क्योंकि आवेदक यूनियन की तरफ से जो मांग की गई है उसकी स्वीकृति के लिए रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा सक्षम नहींहै तथा उचित पक्षकार के विरुद्ध ही अवार्ड निष्पादन योग्य होता है । उचित पक्षकार के अभाव में विवाद से संबंधित कार्यवाही निरर्थक है, अतः रेफरेन्स खारिज किये जाने योग्य है ।
9. सर्वप्रथम यह उल्लेख किया जाना अनुचित नहीं होगा कि न्यायाधिकरण को प्राप्त रेफरेन्स के मुताबिक आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा मांग पत्र अनेक्सर ए प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा को प्रेषित किया गया, जबकि 8 शुद्धि पत्र दिनांक 6-9-02 के संलग्न मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए क्षेत्रीय श्रम आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय श्रम विभाग ( भारत सरकार ) सिविल लाईन्स, अजमेर को सम्बोधित है । प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा को सम्बोधित या प्रेषित कोई मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए के रूप में न्यायाधिकरण को प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है, लेकिन इस संबंध में अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ सेकोई आपत्ति नहीं उठाई गई है । आवेदक यूनियन की तरफ से प्रस्तुत स्टेटमैंट आफक्लेम के पैरा सं . 10 में भी कथित मांग पत्र का विवरण दर्ज है , जो एनेक्सर ए में दर्ज विवरण के समान है । मामले की इन परिस्थितियों में एनेक्सर ए विवादित मांग पत्र होना माना जाता है ।
10. अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से लिखित बहस के माध्यम से जो एक मात्र तर्क पेश हुआ है वह तर्क यह है कि एम.एम.टी.सी. जरिये रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा इस विवाद में उचित पक्षकार नहीं है तथा उचित पक्षकार के अभाव में यह विवाद पोषणीय नहीं है । यह स्वीकृत तथ्य है कि पूर्व माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन ( मिटको ) जो वर्तमान में माईका डिवीजन के रूप में जानी जाती है, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. की सब्सीडरी थी तथा मिटको रुग्ण इकाई होने की वजह से 1992 में बी.आई.एफ.आर. को रेफर हुई तथा बाद में मिटको का विलय एम.एम.टी.सी. में हो गया । अनावेदक कंपनी की तरफ से प्रस्तुत जवाब ( हिन्दी अनुवाद ) के शुरू में
ही उल्लेख है कि " पूर्व माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन ( मिटको ) जिसे वर्तमान में माईका डिवीजन के रूप में जाना जाता है , के मामले को वर्ष 1992 में बी.आई.एफ.आर. के पास भेजा गया था। विस्तृत जांच- पड़ताल के बाद बी.आई.एफ.आर. ने दिनांक 23 अप्रैल, 1993 को पूर्व मिटको को बीमार घोषित कर दिया । तदनुसार बी.आई.एफ. आर. ने 8-4-1996 की मिटिंग मेंमिटकोके एम.एम.टी.सी. लिमिटेड में विलय एवं उसके पुनर्वास-सह- अमालगामेशन-सह-विलय प्लान को स्वीकृति ( सेंक्शन ) दी । " इस तरह सेपूर्वमिटको, आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण जिसके कर्मचारीगण है , का विलय दी मिनरल एंड मैटल्स ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया (एम.एम.टी.सी. ) में हो गया तथा इस एम.एम.टी.सी. का रिजनल कार्यालय, भीलवाड़ा में स्थित है । आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण , जो कि पूर्वमिटको के कर्मचारीगण थे तथा मिटको का विलय एम.एम.टी.सी. में होने से वर्तमान में वे एम.एम.टी.सी. की माईका डिवीजन, भीलवाड़ा में कार्यरत होने बतलाये गये हैं । आवेदक यूनियन के कथनानुसार भीलवाड़ा में माईका डिवीजन में कार्यरत पूर्व मिटको के कर्मचारीगण के कार्य तथा भीलवाड़ामें ही एम.एम.टी.सी. में कार्यरत कर्मचारीगण के कार्य में कोई भिन्नता नहीं है , जबकि उनको देय वेतन व परिलाभों में भिन्नता है । इस तरह की स्थिति में वेतन व परिलाभ में भिन्नता से संबंधित विवाद एम.एम.टी.सी. की भीलवाड़ा स्थित कार्यालय के प्रबंधन एवं आवेदक यूनियन के मध्य होना स्वाभाविक है- परिणामतः भीलवाड़ा स्थित एम.एम.टी.सी.का कार्यालय विचाराधीन विवाद में अनुचित पक्षकार नहीं है। आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा मांग पत्र एम.एम.टी.सी. के भीलवाड़ा स्थित प्रबंधन कार्यालय को प्रेषित किया गया तथा विवाद भी भीलवाड़ा स्थित प्रबंधन कार्यालय आवेदक यूनियन के मध्य उत्पन्न हुआ-जिस स्थिति में एम.एम.टी.सी. को जरिये रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा पक्षकार बनाया जाना किसी तरह से अनुचित नहीं कहा जा सकता । अधि. 1947 की धारा 2 (जी) के तहत " नियोजक " को परिभाषित किया गया है जिसमें स्थानीय प्राधिकारी या उसकी तरफ से संचालित उद्योग के संबंध में उस प्राधिकारी के मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी को नियोजक माना गया है । एम.एम.टी.सी. की तरफ से संचालित उद्योग में भीलवाड़ा स्थित कार्यालय में रिजनल मैनेजर मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी होना प्रतीत होता है । यदि किसी कार्य के लिए उच्चाधिकारियों की स्वीकृति आवश्यक है तो वह स्वीकृती संबंधित अधिकारी याने रिजनल मैनेजर द्वारा प्राप्त किया जाना संभवहै । उच्चाधिकारियों द्वारा इस तरह की स्वीकृति प्रदान नहीं किये जाने की स्थिति में संबंधित अधिकारी द्वारा कथित कार्य से इनकार किया जा सकता है, लेकिन विचाराधीन मामले में इस तरह का प्रसंग नहीं है क्योंकि एम.एम.टी.सी. के रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा द्वारा इस तरह का कोई तर्क पेश नहीं किया गया है कि उसने किसी तरह की स्वीकृति के लिए प्रधान कार्यालय या उच्चाधिकारियों को लिखा । भीलवाड़ा स्थित प्रबंधन कार्यालय सेआवेदक यूनियन का विवाद उत्पन्न होने की स्थिति में आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा भीलवाड़ास्थित कार्यालय के रिजनल मैनेजर को स्वाभाविक तौर पर पक्षकार बनाया गया-जिस प्रयोजनार्थ कंपनी के किसी सर्टिफिकेट आफ इनकार्पोरेशन को पेश किये जाने की आवश्यकत नहीं थी । यदि इस संबंध में किसी सर्टिफिकेट आफ इन कार्पोरेशन की आवश्यकता थी तो वह अनावेदक कंपनी द्वारा पेश किया जाना संभव था । सर्टिफिकेट आफ इनकार्पोरेशन के संबंध में अनादेवक कंपनी की आपत्ति निरर्थक है । इसके अलावा अधि. 1947 के तहत समुचित सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित विवाद का [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
अभिनिर्धारण अधि. 1947 तथा इसके तहत बने नियमों के तहत होता. है । इस तरह के विवाद के अभिनिर्धारण के लिए पक्षकार संयोजन के संबंध में दीवानी प्रक्रिया संहिता के तहत प्रावधान प्रभावी नहीं होते हैं तथा विवाद अभिनिर्धारण के लिए श्रमिक पक्ष एवं नियोजक पक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व पर्याप्त है । विचाराधीन मामले में श्रमिक पक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा किया गया है तथा नियोजक पक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व एम.एम.टी.सी. के रिजनल मैनेजर, भीलवाड़ा द्वारा किया गया है यह सही है तथा आवेदक यूनियन के अध्यक्ष विरेन्द्र सिंह ने भी जिरह में स्वीकार किया कि" मेरे द्वारा प्रस्तुत स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम की विषय वस्तु बाबत व निर्णय लेने व उस निर्णयन का क्रियान्वयन करने का अधिकार चेयरमेन व जनरल मेनेजर एम.एम.टी.सी. पी. एन्ड ए में से दोनों में से किसी एक को है " । लेकिन अनावेदक कंपनी का भीलवाड़ा स्थित रिजनल मेनेजर कार्यालय अनावेदक कंपनी के प्रबंधन का हिस्सा है तथा अनावेदक कंपनी का प्रबंधन नियोजक पक्ष है । केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित रेफरेन्स के शुरु में ही उल्लेख है कि:-
Whereas the Central Government is of the opinion thatan industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of MMTC Limited and their workman in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annesed;
मेरी राय में अनावेदक कंपनी का रिजनल कार्यालय भीलवाड़ा शामिल है तथा यदि रिजनल मेनेजर, भीलवाड़ा की दृष्टि में यह विवाद मुख्यालय से संबंधित था तो मुख्यालय द्वारा विवाद को कंटेस्टकिये जाने में कोई बाधा नहीं थी । न्यायिक विनिश्चय मै. बक्षी स्टील लि. बनाम राज. राज्य आर. एल . आर. 2004 ( 1 ) पेज 755 में माननीय राज. उच्च न्यायालय द्वारा अभिनिर्धारित किया गया कि टैक्नीकल आधार पर क्लेम को खारिज नहीं किया जाना चाहिये । विचाराधीन मामले में भी एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. को मुख्य प्रबंधन के जरिये पक्षकार नहीं बनाया जाकर रिजनल मेनेजर, भीलवाड़ा के जरिये पक्षकार बनाया जाने मात्र आधार पर यह विवाद खारिज किया जाना उचित प्रतीत नहीं होता । 11. आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा जो मांग पत्र अनेक्सर ए प्रेषित किया गया वह इस तरह से है कि :-
"विषय- वाणिज्य मंत्रालय ( भारत सरकार ) के अधीनस्थ एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के प्रबंधन द्वारा हम कर्मियों के वेतनमान इत्यादि में भेदभाव तथा अमानवीय व्यवहार किये जाने के संबंध में ।
मान्यवर,
विनम्र अनुरोध के साथ उपयुक्त विषय के संबंध में श्रीमान्का ध्यान हम लोग निम्न बिन्दुओं के माध्यम से आकृष्ट करना चाहते हैं ताकिश्रीमान्के स्तर से न्याय दिलाने एवं प्रबंधन की मनमानी रोकने की दिशा में आवश्यक कारवाई की जा सके ।
1. वेतनमान-
ए. श्रीमान् हमलोग वर्तमान में एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , जो कि भारत सरकार का उपक्रम है, उसके " माईका डिवीजन" मेंकार्यरत हैं ।
बी. वस्तुतः " माईका डिवीजन " के कर्मी पूर्व में माईका ट्रेडिंग कार्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया लि. ( मिटको ) में कार्यरत थे जी
911 किएम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , एक सब्सिडी के रूप में कार्य था परन्तु, प्रबंधन द्वारा इसे रुग्ण इकाई घोषित कर दिये जाने के फलस्वरूप , बी.आई.एफ. आर. ( भारत सरकार के निर्णय के आलोक में दिनांक 1-4-95 की अवधि से मिटको को पूर्ण रूप से एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के साथ विलय कर दिया गया । संबंधित आदेश अवलोकनार्थ संलग्न है ।
सी. श्रीमान् चूंकि यह इकाई आरंभ से ही एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के एक इकाई के रूप में कार्यरत था, अतः हम कर्मियों का वेतनमान एवं अन्य देयों का भुगतान एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के समान ही होता आ रहा था । डी. परंतु खेद का विषय , विलय के पश्चात् हम लोोगें को एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के समान वेतनमान तथा अन्य देयों से वंचित रखा जा रहा है , परिणामस्वरूप हम कर्मियों का वेतन पुनरीक्षण का कार्य वर्षों से नहीं किया जा रहा है जो किनिम्न तालिका से स्पष्ट हो जायेगा-
1. कामगारों का वेतन पुनरीक्षण ( पे रिवीजन ) वर्ष 1988 से देय।
2. कर्मचारियों का वेतन पुनरीक्षण ( पे रिवीजन ) 1-11-92 सेदेय ।
3. अधिकारियों का वेतन पुनरीक्षण ( पे रिवीजन )1-11-92 से देय।
इ. श्रीमान मिटको जब एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के ही सब्सिडी के रूप में कार्यरत था तो मात्र इसके कर्मचारियों को ही पे-रिवीजन से वंचित करना कदापि न्यायोचित नहीं है जबकि एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. के अन्य कर्मियों का पे-रिवीजन ( वेतन पुनरीक्षण ) नियमानुसार होता आ रहा है । एफ. श्रीमान् जबकि बी.आई.एफ.आर. के निर्देश पर यह पूर्णतः एम एम टी सी लि. के एक अंग के रूप में वर्ष 1995 से कार्यरत है तो ऐसे परिस्थिति में भी हम कर्मियों को एम एम टी सी लि. के वेतनमान से प्रबंधन द्वारा वंचित रखना सरकार के " इक्वल पे फोर इक्वल वर्क" कीनीति का उल्लंघन है ही और प्रबंधन का हम कर्मियों केप्रतिअमानवीय एवं क्रूर पक्ष को स्पष्ट करता है । इस तथा से श्रीमान् भी सहमत होंगे ।
2. अन्यदेयों के संबंध में-
प्रबंधन द्वारा वेतनमान के अलावा बोनस भुगतान में भी भेदभाव किया जा रहा है । माईका डिवीजन के कर्मियों को 8.33 % की दर से तथा अन्य कर्मियों को 20% की दर से भुगतान किया जा रहा है जो कि सरकार के बोनस एक्ट का उल्लंघन है । इसके अलावा अन्य देयों जैसे पी.एल.बी. भुगतान, ए.एल.टी.सी. , त्यौहार अग्रिम, विवाह अग्रिम, वाहन भत्ता , टी.ए. , डी.ए. , चिकित्सा सुविधा यहां तक कि फलुनरल ग्रांट इत्यादिके भुगतान में भी वर्षों से भेदभावा बरता जा रहा है जो कि श्रीमान्के स्तर के आवश्यक जांच के दौरान स्वतः स्पष्ट हो जाएगा । " आउट फिट एलाउन्स " का भुगतान जो वर्ष 1992 से बकाया है हमे प्रबंधन द्वारा मात्र शोषण करने के उद्देश्य से रोक कर रख मेय 912
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
3. कागमारों का वार्षिक वेतनवृद्धि-
श्रीमान् प्रबंधन का छोटे कर्मियों के प्रति मानसिकता का स्तर कितना अमानवीय है वो मात्र इस तथ्य से स्पष्ट हो जायेगा कि कार्यरत कामगारों का वेतन वृद्धि जो मात्र 5 रु. प्रति वर्ष है उसे भी विगत 8 वर्षों से रोक कर रखा गया है ।
4. स्थानांतरण के संबंध में-
ए. श्रीमान्, पूर्व कंपनी " मिटको " तथा एम .एम.टी.सी. लि. में कार्यालय प्रबंधन के स्तर तक के कर्मियों के स्थानांतरण काप्रावधान नहीं है ।
बी. वर्ष 1994 के पूर्व कर्मियों के व्यक्तिगत हितों को ध्यान में रख कर ही स्थानांतरण किया जा रहा था ।
सी. परन्तु वर्ष 1994 से प्रबंधन द्वारा अब तक लगभग 300- 400 कर्मियों को मात्र दमन एवं शोषण करने के उद्देश्य से निरर्थक स्थानांतरण किया गया है ।
डी. परिणामस्वरूप, करोड़ों रु. के बहुमल्य सरकारी राशि का दुरुपयोग तो हुआ ही साथ ही लगभग 1500 कर्मियों में से 1100 कर्मी विवश होकर " स्वेच्छिक सेवानिवृति " ले चुके जो अपने आप में एक रिकार्ड है । इ. श्रीमान भीलवाड़ा कार्यालय में हर स्तर के कर्मियों का स्थानांतरण कर्नाटक, आन्ध्र प्रदेश , केरल इत्यादि में नये कार्यालयों को खोल कर स्थानांतरण किया गया । इतने कम वेतन में दोनों जगहों का खर्च चलाने में सभी पूर्ण रूप से असमर्थ थे परिणामस्वरूप सभी कोई भी आर. लेकर अपने घर राजस्थान वापस आ गये । एफ. श्रीमान्, प्रबंधन जब अपने कुचक्र से भीलवाड़ा कार्यालय खाली करा देने में सफल हो गया तो यहां बिहार के कोडरमा, गिरीडीह एवं पटना इत्यादि स्थानों से हर स्तर के कर्मियों को लाना प्रारंभ किया गया और इस क्रम में वर्तमान में कुल 13 कर्मी बिहार से लाये गये हैं । जी. श्रीमान् जबकि कोडरमा एवं गिरिडीह में उद्योग चल रहा है, ड्यूटी तीनों शिफ्टों में हो रही है तथा निर्यात कार्य भी हो रहा है । परंतु, प्रबंधन शेष बचे मात्र 400 कर्मियों के हितों की उपेक्षा तो वर्षों से कर ही रहा है साथ ही उन्हें सेवा में भी बने नहीं रहने के उद्देश्य से एक षडयंत्र के तहत ही ऐसा कर रहा है ।
एच. श्रीमान् बि. आई.एफ. आर. के आदेश के आलोक में भलीवाड़ा कार्यालय को वर्ष 1995-96 में ही बंद हो जाना था परन्तु प्रबंधन को इन बातों से कोई लेना देना नहींहै । प्रबंधन का उद्देश्य तो मात्र हम निरीह कर्मियों का हर स्तर पर शोषण मात्र ही है । प्रबंधन का इस तरह का आचरण " अनफेयर लेबर प्रेक्टिस " के श्रेणी के अंतर्गत आताहै जिससे श्रीमान् भी सहमत होंगे ।
आई . श्रीमान् भीलवाड़ा कार्यालय में विगत 8-9 वर्षों से कोई व्यापारिक गतिविधि नहीं है , यहां तक कि सभी तरह के उपकरणों को बेच दिया है वैसे परिस्थिति में बिहार राज्य से लोगों को बगैर किसी कार्य के लाकर जमा करना कहां तक तार्किक एवं न्यायोचित है ? इसे श्रीमान् स्वयं महसूस करने में सक्षम हैं ।
हम सभी कर्मी, श्रीमान् से अनुरोध करते हुए कहना चाहते हैं कि " माईका डिवीजन " के कर्मी गुलामों से भी बदतर जिंदगी जीने को विवश हैं , अपने आश्रितों की भी उचित देखभाल करने में असमर्थ तो हैं
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ही साथ ही हम लोगों की सामाजिक प्रतिष्ठा दिन ब दिन धूमिल होती जा रही है । अतः श्रीमान् के स्तर से अविलम्ब हस्तक्षेप आवश्यक हो गया है, ताकि सभी पहलुओं की जांच हो सके और भारतीय संविधान के विभिन्न धाराओं के अंतर्गत सरकार द्वारा बनाये गये नियमों एवं उपनियमों के आलोक में हम निरीह कर्मियों के हितों के रक्षार्थ एम एम टी सी लि. प्रबंधन को उचित दिशानिर्देश श्रीमान् के स्तर से प्रेषित किया जा सके । श्रीमान्के सहानुभूतिपूर्ण हस्तक्षेप हेतु हम सभी कर्मी मात्र ही आशान्वित नहीं बल्कि400 परिवार की निगाह आपके न्यायपूर्ण निर्णय के प्रति आभार पूर्ण नेत्रों के साथ प्रतिक्षारत हैं ।
सधन्यवाद ।
भवदीय
एस. डी.
के. एन. सिंह ,
(महासचिव) केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा इस न्यायालय को जो विवाद अधिनिर्णयार्थ प्रेषित हुआ है वह इस तरह से है कि क्या आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा उपर्युक्त मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी.लि. , भीलवाड़ा को प्रेषित करना उचित है ? इस रेफरेन्स में मांग पत्र के औचित्य बाबत कोई प्रश्न निहित होना प्रतीत नहीं होता तथा रेफरेन्स में यही प्रश्न निहित होना प्रतीत होता है कि क्या प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भी भलवाड़ा को मांग पत्र यूनियन द्वारा प्रेषित किया जाना उचित है । विधि की यह स्थिति स्पष्ट है कि न्यायालय का अभिनिर्धारण विवाद बिन्दु तक सीमित होता है । अधि. 1947 की धारा 10 ( 4 ) के तहत भी इस आशय का स्पष्ट प्रावधान है तथा न्यायिक विनिश्चय आलिक गोमान बनाम औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण, भुवनेश्वर ए.आई.आर. 1964 ( एस.सी. पेज 1446 , पोटर मजदूर पंचायत बनाम परफेक्ट पोट्री कं. ए.आई.आर. 1979 ) (एस.सी. ) पेज 1356 में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय द्वारा भी इसी तरह का मत अभिव्यक्त किया गया है । विधि की इस स्थिति मे परिपेक्ष्य में विचाराधीन मामले में न्यायालय का अभिनिर्धारण इस विवाद बिन्दु तक सीमित है कि क्या आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा को प्रेषित किया जाना उचित है । उल्लेखनीय है कि आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण तथा एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , के श्रमिकगण/कर्मचारीगण के कार्य में समानता बताई गई है , जबकि उनको देय वेतनमान व परिलाभों में भिन्नता बताई गई है तथा आवेदक यूनियन के सदस्यगण भी अनावेदक कंपनी के अधीन हैं जिस स्थिति में आवेदक यूनियन द्वारा मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा को प्रेषित करना उचित है । यदि रिजनल मेंनेजर/प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा कथित मांग पत्र एनेक्सर ए की स्वीकृति के लिए सक्षम नहीं है तो उसके द्वारा इस संबंध में समुचित कार्यवाही किया जाना संभव है । मांग पत्र के संबंध में यूनियन व प्रबंधन के मध्य वार्ता के पश्चात् समझौता होना भी संभव है । 12. केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित विवाद निम्न तरह से निर्णित किया जाता है :-
इलैक्ट्रोनिक ट्रेड यूनियन भीलवाड़ा द्वारा मांग पत्र एनेक्सर " ए " प्रबंधक, एम.एम.टी.सी. लि. , भीलवाड़ा को प्रेषित करना उचित है । उपर्युक्तानुसार पंचाट जारी किया जाता है ।
पंचाट आज दिनांक 19-11-04 को खुले न्यायालय में लिखाया जाकर सुनाया गया ।
एम. एल. शर्मा- प्रथम , न्यायाधीश 913
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माष 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
2. The case ofthe first party workman as made out in the Claim Statement is as follows :-
का०आ ० 286.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 65/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/277/1998- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]
सी० गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004
S.O. 286. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 65/99 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the Management of Dena Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29-12-2004.
[No. L - 12012/277/ 1998 -IR(B - II) ] C. GANDADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
"SHRAM SADAN", III MAIN , III CROSS, II PHASE, TUMKUR ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE- 560022
Dated: 14th December, 2004
PRESENT:
SHRI A. R. SIDDIQUI , PresidingOfficer
C. R. No. 65/99
II PARTY
IPARTY
Shri Henry,
TheRegional Authority,
No. 555
DenaBank,
SonaTowers ,
BabuBuilding,
III Cross,
1stFloor,
71, Millers Road,
ViveknagarPost,
BANGALORE - 560047
BANGALORE-560022
AWARD
The first party was appointed as a Driver by the Second Party Management during December 1987. His first appointment was treated as temporary and he was being paid Rs . 750 as wages every month. Even though, he was appointed by the Second Party management , his services were being treated as a Personal Driver , to the Officers of the Bank . It is submitted that by means of a memorandum issued by the Second Party management dated 1-8-1997 the first party workman was informed that he is appointed as a Cleaner- cum - Sepoy in the pay scale ofRs . 1600 with other allowances . This appointment order further stated that he will be on probation for a period of 6 months which is liable to be extended in terms of the service conditions governing the employees in the Bank . Pursuant to the said Memorandum , he was working continuously. Even though , the first party workman was working regularly and to the entire satisfaction of his official superiors , he was informed by means of a Memorandum dated 28-1-1998 that the management has decidedtoextend the period ofprobation by three months from 1-2-1998 i.e. on expiry of 6 months from the date of joining the bank i.e. 1-8-97 . It is submitted that even though , he was designated as Cleaner - cum- Sepoy , he was working regularly as a driver and his record of service istotally unblemished. Instead of confirming his services , after he completed 6 months period of probation, the Second Party management by means of a memorandum dated 28-1-1998 unreasonably extended the period of probation by 3 months . However, in obedience of the said memorandum , the first party workman continued to discharge his duties as usual . It is submitted that to the entire shock and surprise of the first party workman , a memorandum dated 27-4-1998 came to be issued informing the first party workman that his services are terminated without notice and with immediate effect, as his services were found unsuitable for employment in the Bank. The firstparty workman was further informed that a month's pay and allowances for a period of notice period is paid as per the pay order dated 27-4-1998 . He was further informed that he is relieved from the duties of the bank after the office hours on 27-4-1998 . It is submitted that the action of the Second Party management in terminating the services of the first party workman as per their memorandum dated 27-4-1998 is unjust, illegal and arbitrary.
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012/277/ 98 /IR (B - II) dated 29th April , 1999 for adjudication on the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the termination of Shri Henry , Cleaner- Cum-Sepoy, by the management of Dena Bank is justified? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
3. It is submitted that ever since his initial appointment intheBankduring December 1987 , he has been working as a driverthough the management contended that his services werebeing utilized as personal driver ofthe officers of the bank. Initially he was being paid monthly salary of Rs . 750/- which came tobe enhanced to Rs. 1800/-. Rightfrom the date ofhis initial appointment, there is no break in service and that the first party workman worked continuously till he was 914
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
illegally terminated as per the memorandum dated 27-4-1998 . The action of the Second Party management therefore is totally unjust and otherwise illegal .
4. It is further submitted that the first party workman has worked continuously for more than 240 days before he was illegally terminated on 27-4-1998 . The action of the Second Party management therefore amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2 ( 00 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called as "Act" ) . Since the Management has not complied with the mandatory requirement of Section 25 F of the Act, the entire action is void ab initio and it is otherwise illegal . The action of the management is also violative of mandatory requirements of Chapter V- A and V-B of the Act.
5. In any view of the matter , the action of the 2nd Party management it totally malafide . The work of the first party workman is totally unblemished and the record of service is highly exemplary . It is because of his excellent record of service as a driver on temporary basis from December 1987 onwards , the management of the bank gave him regular appointment order during 1997 , without examining this aspect of the matter , the 2nd Party management has terminated the services of the first party workman on the ground of his unsuitability . During his entire career, he was not served any memo or notice with regard to his record of service . Hence , the entire action of the second party management is violative of rules of natural justice . The management has terminated the services of the first party workman by way of arbitrary and carricious exercise of powers . The entire action of the second party management lacks in bonafide , hence the order of termination cannot be sustained .
6. In any view of the matter , the action of the Second Party management is totally unjustified. In fact , when the firstparty workman was given an appointment during December 1987 he was informed that his appointment is temporary only for a fiew months and thereafter his services will be regularized. But this did not materialize . Nevertheless, the first party workman was working honestly with a fond expectation that his services will be regularized. Instead of regularizing his services and conducting like a model employer , 2nd Party management resorted to worst kind of unfair labour practice by utilizing the services of 1st party workman on temporary basis without paying him minimum wages and ultimately after he was brought on probation, the first party workman was highly confident that his services would be regularized sooner. Unfortunately, the Management after utilizing the services of the first party workman for over 11 years, terminated the services of the first party workman in most unceremonious manner . The entire action of the second party management is unjust and it is a clear case of unfair labour practice as defined under Section 2(ra) read with th Schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Looking at it from anypoint ofview, the entire action of the second party management is unjust and arbitrary.
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 7. Being aggrieved by the action of the 2nd Party management, in terminating the services of the first party workman illegally, he approached the management on several occasions . Since his request was not considered, he raised an Industrial Dispute. The matter was taken up in conciliation and after conciliation ended in failure, the Government has referred the above dispute for Industrial Adjudication. Hence , this claim statement .
8. Therefore , the first party requested this court to set aside the order of the management terminating his services with reinstatement, continuity of service and other consequential benefits .
9. The Second Party management by its Counter Statement urged as under:
10. It is submitted that first party was working at our Regional Office, Bangalore as Cleaner -Cum- Sepoy vide appointment memorandum BRO/PER/ 3590 / 97 dated 1-08-1997 . His appointment was made under following terms and conditions :
(1) His appointment will be subject to his passing physical fitness examination by the Doctor approved by the Bank .
(2) He will be on probation for a period of 6 months , which is liable to be extended in terms of the service conditions governing the employees in this Bank.
(3) During the probationary period, his services are liable to be terminated at any time, without notice and without assigning any reason .
(4) He is liable to be transferred to any of the branches of the Bank ,
(5) He will be bound by the rules and regulations ofthe Bank applicable to workman staff from time to time.
(6) He will have to join , not later than 15-8-1997, he is posted at Regional Office , Bangalore temporarily.
(7) In case any information/particulars supplied by him are found to be false or he has wilfully supplied false information or if material information is suppressed his appointment will be terminated forthwith without assigning any reason .
11. The first party after going through the memorandum dated 1-8-1997, signed his acceptance, stating that " I hereby accept the above terms and conditions " .
12. Subsequently , during his probation period the Bank received a Complaint on 24-11-1997 stating that he wasdismissed from services with effect from 13-10-1986 afterconducting departmental enquiry , due to misconduct on account ofmisusing petrol by Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation Limited. Further , reference No. 72/1987 has 915
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
beenfiled before the Additional Labour Court where the matter was dismissed .
the above dismissal reference vide letter dated 23-04-1998 . He withheld the above said information at the time of his appointment, in his affidavit dated 25-7-1997. This is in total disregard of Clause 7 of his appointment memorandum.
13. Later , the said complaint dated 25-11-1997 was sent to the Vigilance Department for Investigation and report . Meanwhile as , the investigation was going on , a memorandum No. BRO/PER/464/98 dated 28-1-1998 was issued to him , whereby , the period of his probation was extended by three months . The Regional Office Vide letter dated BR/PER/4638/ 97 dated 22-10-1997 directed Personal Manager and Vigilance Officer to conduct a proper enquiry at various organizations like KSRTC, KSTCetc. for verification of the complaint .
18. The Disciplinary Authority perused the findings oftheManager (Personnel ) and Vigilance Officer and found thatthe first party, Shri Henry is unsuited for employment in the Bank. As the first party has personally signed the acceptance ofthe terms and conditions of the appointment order and suppressed his past misconduct in his sworn affidavit , he fails in his conduct in his sworn affidavit , he fails in his conduct to uphold the undertaking given by him.
19. The Second Party was also satisfied to the reasonableness of the investigation conducted by the Manager(Personnel ) and Vigilance Officer .
14. During the said investigation, it was found that he was dismissed from services with effect from 13-10-1986 due to misconduct on account of misusing petrol by Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation Limited. Further, reference where the matter was . This information was provided vide letter No. E6 : PFH : 41 : 81-82 dated 11-02-1998 wherein General Manager (Per .) of Karnataka Silk Corporation Ltd. is the signatory.
20. It is submitted that the action of the Second Party i.e. Dena Bank, Bangalore in terminating the services ofShri Henry, Cleaner- Cum - Sepoy from services w.e.f. 27-04-1998 is legal , proper and justified. The removal is proportionate to the acts of Shri Henry in accordance with theBipartite Settlement .
21. Therefore the Second Party requested this court to reject the reference .
15. The first party in his affidavit (Notarised on 25-7-1997) did not inform the Bank about the said dismissal from Karnataka Silk Corporation Limited. This is in contravention of clause 7 of appointment memorandum No. BRO/PER/3590 / 97 dated 1-8-1997. The clause (7), states that in case any information/particulars supplied by him are found to be false or he has willfully supplied false information will be terminated forthwith without assigning any reason.
22. During the course of the trial , the management examined one witness as MW1 and got marked 12 documents Ex. Ml to M12 . There was no cross examination onbehalf of the first party. The statement of MW1 in his Examination Chief is as follows:
16. The very purpose of placing Shri Henry on probation is to try him during the probation period to assess his suitability in the job. It is settled law that an order of discharge is not and order of punishment . (Unit Trust of India Vs. T. Bijaya Kumat 1992) . Further the termination ofprobationer for not rendering satisfactory service or for not fulfilling conditions for confirmation is proper (Divisional Manager LIC of India Vs. M. Venugopal 1993 I CLR, 372) .
Counter are filed by the Personal Officer ( Senior Manager , Personnel) . I know the facts of the case. Ex. M1 is the application given by the workman. Ex . M2 is the affidavit of the workman . Ex . M3 is the letter of appointment. Ex. M4 is the extension of periodofproceedings of first party. Complaint is Ex . M5. Ex. M6 is the letter of Silk Industries Corporation. Ex . M7 is the letter of bank to Silk Industries. Ex. M8 isMemorandum of termination. Ex . M9 is the letter ofAdvocate with Advocates letter . Ex . M10 and M11 is the letter of Silk Industries informing the details . Ex . M12 is the letter to Bank .
17. As he has not acted as per the terms and conditions set out in his appointment order , affidavit etc. theBank was constrained to terminate him with immediate effect from its services from 27-4-1998 as he was found unsuited for employment in Bank . One month's pay and allowance is paid to him by pay order No. 941295 dated 27-04-1998 vide memorandum No. BRO/PER/ 1949/98 dated 27-4-1998 . The said memorandum satisfies the provisions ofBipartite Settlement and as per the undertaking given by Shri Henry , in writing , while accepting the terms of conditions of the appointment order. Though he was aware of the proceedings in reference No. 72/87 , before Additional Labour Court , Bangalore where he was fighting against his dismissal from service from KSIC , he informed the Second Party only on 24-4-1998 after getting his appointment memorandum dated 1-8-1997 . Similarly he also informed through his lawyer Shri A.J. Srinivasan about
23. There was no oral or documentary evidence led on behalf of the first party . On 9-11-2004, when the casewastaken up for arguments , learned counsel for the firstparty remained absent and whereas learned counsels for the Second Party in his argument submitted that the first party's services have been terminated during the course of probationary period, his services not being found satisfactory and on the ground that he has suppressed the material facts of his dismissal from service from Karnataka Silk Industries Corporation Ltd. before he joined services of the management . It was contended that the appointment of the first party as a Cleaner - cum- 916
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]
of the said reference proceedings , suppressing this material fact , the first party joined the services of the Second Party management against the terms and conditions of the above said appointment order . As seen , above he joined the services of the management as per the appointment order dated 1-8-1997 when the above said dispute raised by him before the Labour Court was very much pending. Had he disclosed this fact in his application , then , certainly the Second Party Management would have been the last authority to provide him the employmnent . He suppressed this fact and during the course of investigation done by the management this fact was brought to light by the letter dated 11-2-1998 marked as Ex. M6 addressed to the management by the General Manager (P) of the said Corporation . Therefore , absolutely no fault can be found with the management in terminating the services of the firstparty after having come to know that he suppressed the material fact in acquiring the appointment under the management . Moreover , as per the appointment order condition No. 3 , his services were also liable to be terminated during the probationary period without notice and without assigning any reason. Therefore , by no stretch of imagination it can be said that the mamagement was not justified in terminatinng the services of the first party before he completed the probationary period satisfactorily . Moreover , the present reference also cannot be entertained for the simple reason that as per the above said award passed by the Labour Court , he has already been reinstated in service . He cannot hold the job with the above said Corporation simultaneously rendering his services with the Second Party management . Therefore , for the reasons stated above reference is liable to be dismissed and hence the following award .
AWARD
The reference is dismissed . No order to cost .
(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 14th December 2004)
A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 287.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पश्चिमी रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई . डी नं. 6/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Sepoy was , made as per the memorandum dated 1-8-97 and as per the terms of his appointment order his services were liable to be terminated during the course of probationary period at any time without notice and without assigning any reason . One of the terms of the appointment also was to the effect that in case any information supplied by him was found to be false or that he willfully supplied false information , his appointment will be terminated forthwith without assigning any reason. Therefore , since the first party suppressed the material fact of his earlier employment with the above said Corporation and the fact that he was dismissed from service on account of committing misconduct , the managemennt was legally justified in terminating the services of the first party that too without any reason . In this context, learned counsel relied upon the aforesaid documents marked at Ex . Ml to M12 . After having gone through the oral and documentary evidence produced before this Tribunal . I find substance in the arguments advanced for the management . As per Ex . M3 which is the memorandum appointing the first party as Cleaner - cum - Sepoy , condition No. 3 of the appointment order was to the effect that services of the firstparty are liable to be terminated during the period of probation without any notice and without any reason. As per condition No. 7 his services were liable to be terminated, in case , he furnished false information or suppressed any material information in getting his appointment . It can seen from the very letter filed by the first party with the management and marked before this tribunal as Ex. M9 , he had raised a dispute pending before the Additional Labour Court , Bangalore in Reference No. 72/87 challenging his dismissal order . The letter at Ex . M10 purported to be written by the counsel representing the first party before the said Labour Court would reveal the fact that the reference proceedings which were pending before the Additional Labour Court, Bangalore have come to be concluded and an award to be passed by the Labour Court , was awaited. An award copy also filed before this tribunal passed in reference No. 72/87 by the said Labour Court dated 1-4-98 would reveal that the dispute raised by the first party before the said Labour Court came to be disposed of by allowing the said reference in part where under the management , namely , the said Corporation was directed to reinstate the first party in to service with back wages of 25% from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement . As per the above said award an office order dated 11-8-98 also has been passed by the said Corporation reinstating the first party into service . Therefore, from the aforesaid document . two facts emerged very clearly. One is the fact that the first party had already been dismissed from service by the said Corporation on the ground of misconduct committed by him. This dismissal order was challenged by the first party in reference No. 72/87 before the Labour Court , Bangalore and pending disposal
[सं. एल-41012/176/2002- आई. आर. ( बी- I ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 S.O. 287. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (1.D. No. 6/2003 ) of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Jodhpur now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Western Railway and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-12-2004
[No. L-41012/ 176/2002 -IR(B -I) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy.
अनुबन्ध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी
: श्रीके. के. गुप्ता, आर. एच. जे. एस.
ओ. वि. ( केन्द्रीय ) संख्या : 06/2003
.....प्रार्थी दिलीप कुमार फाल्के द्वारा संयुक्त मंत्री, भारतीय मजदूर संघ द्वारा ललित शर्मा , एस. बी. बी. जे . मंडिया रोड शाखा, पाली मारवाड़ ।
बनाम
..... अप्राथी डिवीजनल रेलवे मैनेजर, पश्चिम रेलवे, अजमेर (राज. )
उपस्थिति:
1. प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी श्री अनिल मेहता उप.
2. अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी श्री ए. एस. चौहान उप .
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक 19-8-2004
श्रम मंत्रालय भारत सरकारी , नई दिल्ली ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल. 41012/176/ 2002-12/ 176 /2002- आई . आर. ( बी-1 )दिनांक 28-3-2003 से निम्न विवाद वास्ते अधिनिर्णय इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया है :-
" क्या मण्डल रेल प्रबन्धक पश्चिम रेलवे , अजमेर द्वारा कर्मकार भी दिलीप कुमार फाल्के मुख्य गाड़ी परीक्षक को उसके द्वारा दिनांक 5-4-94से दिनांक 2-11-95 तक तदर्थ आधार पर मुख्य गाड़ी परीक्षक के पद पर की गई सेवा का लाभ कर्मकार को नहीं देकर अपने द्वारा जारी वरिष्ठता सूची के क्रमांक 97 पर दर्शाया जाना उचित एवं वैध है । यदि नहीं, तो कर्मकार अपने नियोजक से क्याराहत पाने का अधिकारी है । "
उक्त रेफरेन्स इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त होने पर दर्ज रजिस्टर्ड किया जाकर पक्षकारों को जरिये नोटिस आहुत किया गया । प्रार्थी ने अपना माँग- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिसका अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब पेश किया गया । माँग- पत्र के समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया तथा अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब ने समर्थन में राजहंस कुमावत का शपथ- पत्र 109 GI/2005-33
917
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
प्रस्तुत किया गया तथा यह प्रकरण प्रार्थी से जिरह हेतु नियत था । दिनांक 12-8-2004 को प्रार्थी की ओर से एक प्रार्थना- पत्र इस आशय का पेश किया कि वह उक्त प्रकरण को आगे बढ़ाना नहीं चाहता है तथा लोक अदालत की भावना से उक्त प्रकरण को वापस लेना चाहता हूँ । उक्त प्रार्थना- पत्र की प्रति आज विपक्षी को दी गई चूंकि प्रार्थी लोक अदालत की भावना से इस प्रकरण में आगे कोई कार्यवाही चलाना नहीं चाहता है । अतः समस्ततथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए इस प्रकरण में " कोई " विवाद नहीं रह जाने का अधिनिर्णय ( नो डिस्पयुट एवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।
जावे। इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ केन्द्रीय शासन को प्रेषित किया यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 19-8-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया।
के. के. गुप्ता, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 288.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी नं. 76/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-41012/ 18/2001-आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] बी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004 S.O. 288. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 76/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Central Railway and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-12-2004 .
[No. L-41012/ 18/2001 - IR (B -I) ] B. M. DAVID, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR-COURT, LUCKNOW PRESENT:
Shrikant Shukla , Presiding Officer L. D. No. 76/2001
REF . No. L-41012/18/2001 - IR (B -I ) DATED 16-5-2001 BETWEEN :
Shri Rup Narayan , S/o Shri Ram Lakhan C/o 119/74, Qr. No. 61 , Nasimabad, Kanpur ( U.P. )- 208012 918
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] AND
1. Divisional Railway Manager (P) Central Railway, Jhansi - 284001 .
2. Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Central Railway , Jhansi - 284001 .
AWARD
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L -41012 / 18/ 2001 - IR (B - I ) dated 16-5-2001 has referred following dispute for adjudication to the Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Lucknow .
"Whether the action, of the management of Divisional Railway Manager , Central Railway , Jhansi in terminating the services of Shri Rup Narayan w.e.f. 6-7-1990 is legal andjustified. Ifnot, what reliefthe workman is entitled ? "
servant because he never completed the required number of continuous service during his entire career. Itisadmitted that the worker worked as mobile seasonal casual waterman only up to 1990 and from 1990 he was not engaged as mobile seasonal casual waterman any more . The opposite party has catergorically denied that any of the juniors to the worker is continuing in the service . The service of mobile seasonal casual watermen are utilised during hot weather - cum - summer season, as soon as the monsoon starts or the period for which they were engaged ( they are not engaged for more than 3 months in a year) , expires , their services are automatically dispensed with or dispensed with or discontinued whichever is earlier. Since the year 1990 , the railway administration is providing water coolers ; water taps etc. at the railway station for providing cool drinking water to the passengers and thus the services of mobile seasonal casual watermen were no longer required during hot weather/ summmer season .
The workman's case on brief is that he worked as waterman/ ca labour w.e.f. 18-8-1976 to 6-7-1990 under DRM , CR , Jhansi on Sidhi Itara Junction Railway Station, but the railway's administration instead of regularising the workman on regular post, they deprived worker of thejob . The workman tried to know the reasons for his disengagement he was told that someone else was engaged in his place . The worker has therefore alleged that worker has been deprived of from his job and while the juniors were retained in service without notice in violation of Section 25 (f) , ( g) and ( h) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The worker has alleged that he has worked for more than 240 days but he has been retrenched without notice pay and compensation . The workman has therefore prayed that his termination dated 7-7-1990 be declared illegal . He has further prayed that he be reinstated with back wages and all consequential benefits and has also requested that the opposite party may be asked to regularise the worker in service as he has put in more than 120 days work.
The opposite party has denied the claim vide his written statement . The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager has admitted that the worker was engaged as a mobile seasonal casual waterman for intermittent work at railway station for giving drinking water to the passengers at the said railway station. The aforesaid work for which the worker was engaged , was for hot weather seasonal work of intermittent nature . The nature of his engagement was properly explained to him along with all other watermen engaged for the aforesaid purpose before their such engagements . The worker continued to work as mobile seasonal casual waterman for less than 3 months each from year 1978 till 1990 and he never completed 120 days continuous service during the said period. There is no question of his completing 240 days service within a calendar year. He was never conferred the status of temporary railway
Accordingly , since 1990 , mobile seasonal casual watermen were being disengaged on the basis of last come first go basis . However , since the year 1992 all the mobile seasonal casual watermen were disengaged and they were not engaged again till date. It has been further stated by the opposite party that the Ministry of Railways , Railway Board issued a circular dated 3-2-92 directing the railway administration to make sufficient arrangements ar providing drinking water at railway stations by installing water coolers and water taps at railway station, Jhansi and at the nearby railway stations . 8 water coolers were installed at Jhansi railway station and more than 77 water coolers were installed at the nearby railway stations under the administrative control of DRM, CR, Jhansi . Thus , requirement of engaging any mobile seasonal casual waterman became less and less and since the year 1992 and it was not required at all , under these circumstances , the action of the respondent in not engaging these mobile seasonal casual watermen cannot be said to be arbitrary or illegal because there was no need for providing water to passengers and staff when alternative and permanent arrangements for the same had already been made at the railway station . None of the junior to the applicant has been retained in service nor there has been any violation of the provisions ofSection 25 ( f) , (g) or (h) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The said provisions do not apply in the present case . The discontinuance of the service of the claimant was not a retrenchment as defined in the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 , as such, Section 25 (f) , (g) and (h) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 are not applicable in the present case . In view of the aforesaid facts , reasons and circumstances , the claimant is not entitled to any relief as claimed , on the other hand, the present industrial dispute is liable to be dismissed with cost against the claimant and in favour of the opposite party .
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
The authorised representative of the worker filed rejoinder on 12-4-2002.
The worker and his representative started absenting on dated of hearing , i.e. , 11-7-2002, 2-8-2002 and 11-9-2002 .
On 11-9-2002 the court ordered the case to proceed ex-parte against the worker and the management was directed to file documentary and oral evidence on 26-9-2002 .
On 26-9-2002 the worker remained absent and therefore the next date fixed was 1-10-2002 for preliminary sitting in the lok adalat on 7-10-2002 . The worker's representative appeared and participated in preliminary sitting of the lok adalat but no compromise was arrived at therefore , 13-11-2002 was fixed for evidence of the employer. Since the case was proceeding ex -parte against the worker on 13-11-2002, 23-12-2002, 24-2-2003, 28-2-2003 the worker and his representative remained absent . However , 31-3-2003 was fixed for filing affidavit by employer . On 31-3-2003 also the employer did not file affidavit and sought adjournment. However, on 30-6-2003 also when the worker remained absent the court ordered the case to proceed ex -parte against the worker and the opposite party was directed to produce his evidence . The representative of opposite party filed his evidence i.e. affidavit of S.K. Raijada alongwith documents .
None appeared for argnment therefore perused case file , evidence and documents on record .
The employer has filed following documents:
1. Photo state copy of railway circular No. 92/TG.I/ I/P dated 3-2-1992 regardings deployment of hot weather and mobile watermen during summer season.
2. Photo state copy of award passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Governemnt Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Kanpur in I.D. No. 15/1995 between Surendra Singh and DRM, CR, Jhansi.
3. Photo state copy of notification dated 31-5-2000.
4. Photo state copy of award of the Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court Kanpur in I.D. No. 109/1997 between Surendra Singh and DRM, CR, Jhansi .
5. Photo state copy of order of Central Administrative Tribunal , Allahabad in Original Application No. 1309/1996 between Ram Chandra v/ s . Union of India .
6. Photo state copy of the order of Central Administrative Tribunal , Allahabad in Original Application No. 1118/1999 between Raghunath v/s . Union of India .
The employer has also filed following case laws:
919
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
1. Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 1283 and 1284 of 2002 between the Range Forest Officer & another v/s . S.T. Hadimani of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India published in 316 All India Services Law Journal Vol . VII -2002 (2) .
2. 2002 Allahabad Law Journal 831 Rajesh Kumar Sharma v/s . The Presiding Officer , Kanpur and another.
Onthe one hand the worker has failed to prove by documentary or oral evidence that he has put in 120 days continuous service in a year on the other hand the opposite party has alleged in written statement that the services of mobile seasonal casual watermen are utilised during hot weather - cum -summer season and as soon as the monsoon starts for the period for which they were engaged, expires , their services are automatically dispensed with or discontinued which ever is earlier .
Theworker has not proved that he performed duties of other than seasonal waterman . The worker ought to have filed casual labour card issued to him, which are issued to casual labours . Since he has not filed any casual labour card therefore , adverse inference is drawn against the worker that if he had filed the casual labour card it would have effected his case adversely. The worker has failed to prove that he was given the temporary status as a casual labour .
The employer has by affidavit proved that the worker has never worked for 120 days in a calendar year. The management has also proved that vide letter dated 3-2-92 , Ministry of Railways , Railway Board issued a circular in respect of deployment of hot weather and mobile watermen during summer season. A perusal of aforesaid circular would reveal that railway administration ought to have reduced the strength of watermen because of their diminishing utility and desirability . The employer has also proved that railway modernised drinking water arrangement , a large number of water coolers with multiples taps/ single point taps suitably spaced have been installed on platform. Thus , the requirement of water huts ; water trolleys etc. have been reduced. The utility and desirability of engagement of watermen during hot weather season is also not required . The employer has also proved that against their respective disengagement, certain hot weather staff raised an industrial dispute before the Central Government Industrial Tribnunal - cum - Labour Court . Their cases were registered as I.D. No. 15 of 1995 and 109 of 1997. In both the cases , identical facts and law were involved . The learned Presiding Officer of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court was pleased to dismiss both the said cases with categorical finding that concerned workmen are not entitled to any relief. Similarly , certain other workmen preferred their cases before Central Admi vistrative Tribunal , wh 920
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
were registered as O.A. No. 1309 of 1996 and 1118 of 1999. The CAT was also pleased to dismiss the cases of respective workmen on merits .
कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. नं . 175/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/240/2000- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004
S.O. 289. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( I.D. No. 175/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of State Bank ofBikaner and Jaipur and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 29-12-2004
Similarly, in a case of the Ranged Forest Officer and another v / s . S.T. Hadimani , the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has said that unless the workman proves his claim , the opposite party cannot be called upon to disprove it . In yet another judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held that in case of seasonal watermen , provision of Section 25F would not be applicable . Similarly , the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad in yet another case has held that Section 25 F would not be applicable in cases of fixed term appointment . The employer has proved that as per provision of Rule 2005 of the Indian Railway Establishment manual , Volume - II , even those casual labour who have attained the status of temporary railway servant or MRCL status are not entitled to their automatic absorption/regularisation even they have to appear before the screening as per their seniority and only after being declared successful in the said screening they can be considered for their regularisation.
[No. L - 12012/240/2000- IR (B -I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT , LUCKNOW
PRESENT : SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer
I. D. No. 175/2000
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in 316 all India Servie Law Journal VII - 2002 (2 ) between the Range Forest Officer and Another v/s . S.T. Hadimani has laid down thatunless the workman proves his claim the respondent cannot be called upon to disprove it . In the present case the workman has not been able to prove his case that employer's action to terminate his services w.e.f. 6-7-90 is illegal or unjustified.
Ref. No. L- 12012/240/2000/IR (B - I) Dated 16-10-2000
BETWEEN :
Shri Prem Singh C/o Sri Radhey Shyam Tewari , 107/76 Jawahar Kanpur , (U.P. ) 208001
AND
The seasonal water man are engaged in hot weather season to provide water to staff and passengers for the fixed period i.e. till the hot weather and as soon as the monsoon starts or the period for which they were engaged, expires , their services are automatically dispensed with or discontinued whichever is earlier . In the circumstances their appointment is termed as fixed term appoint and non - compliance of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not illegal .
TheGeneral Manager , State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, H.O. Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302001
AWARD
On the consideration of aforesaid evidence and fact I am of the opinion that action of the management of Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway in terminating the services of worker Rup Narayan w.e.f. 6-7-1990 is legal and justified and the worker is not entitled to any relief. Award passed accordingly.
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer
Lucknow 17-12-2004 .
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
TheGovernment of India . Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide its order No. L- 12012/240/ 2000 /IR( B - I ) dated 16-10-2000 referred the following dispute for adjudication toPresiding Officer, CGIT- cum - Labour Court, Lucknow :
का.आ. 289.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एंड जयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके
Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur in terminating the services of Shri Prem Singh w.e.f. 19-3-85 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what refief the workman is entitled to ? " 921 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
3. Memorandum of appointment for the period 27-2-85 to 18-3-85 paper No. 4/4 .
4. Experience certificate for services w.e.f. 29-12-84 to 18-3-85 paper No.4/5 .
5. Photo copy of application for employement purported to have been received by the opposite party on 20-6-87 paper No. 4/6 , 7.
6. Photo copy of applicationdt . 1-6-87 address to ALC(C) Kanpur.
The worker's case in brief is that he was appointed in the State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur branch Birhana , Kanpur from 28-12-84 on the post of Peon/ Chowkidar and he continued to work till 18-3-85 , but on 19-3-85 his services were terminated abruptly without any reason and without observing the provision of I.D. Act . According to the worker , the employer never allowed to works of 4th Class to complete 90 days work and after terminating the sevices new hands appointed, so that the worker may not claim permanency. It is alleged that the post of Peon /Chowkidar is of permanent nature but the management has been deploying temporarily and daily rated workman on the said post which amount of unfair labour practice. The worker has further alleged that the worker filed a case for concilation before Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( C) Kanpur through U.P. Bank Employees Federation within the time allowed by the law on which the bank object that the worker never turned up for service . the bank also alleged before the ALC ( C ) that regular notice shall be given and the workers shall be re - engaged . On the assurance of the opposite party the ALC (C ) adjudicate the case as unsuitable for reference . Aggrieved by the order of the Central Government/ Labour Deptt. the U.P. Bank Employees Federation filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court , Allahabad No. CMWP 45884/92 the Hon'ble High Court on 12-3-99 passed the following order:
"Let a mandamus do issue accordingly . In case reference is sought by individual workman once again within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is obtained by the union, the appropriate authority under section 10 is directed to reconsider the said question once again within a period of one month from the date of raising such dispute . No. Cost."
The worker again filed deprication before Asstt. Labour Commissioner (C ) Kanpur requesting for reference to the Government . The worker has been pursuing hard to get the employment but he failed to get the employment . It isfurther alleged that juniors to the worker has been retained in services .
The worker has prayed that this court may declare the termination of the worker dt . 19-3-85 as illegal and unjustified . The worker has also prayed that he be reinstated in services with all consequential benefits . The worker has filed photo copies of the following documents in support of his case ;
1. Memorandum of appointment of the worker for the period 29-12-84 to 27-1-85 paper No. 4/2 .
2. Memorandum of appointment of the worker for the period 28-1-85 to 26-2-85 paper No. 4/3 .
Opposite party has denied the claim of the worker and has stated that the opposite party bank has prescribed rules for appointment of temporary workman and for such appointment the maximum age limit is 24 years . The worker's appointment was not made by the competent authority according to the rules, but he was appointed for temporarily period when the regular employees proceeded on leave . It is alleged that his appointment was purely temporarily period and was for fixed period wothout adopting the prescribed procedure only with a view to exigencies according to the procedure laid down for the appointment of such sub staff the names are called from Employment Exchange and after interview they are appointed and without observing thisprocedure nobody can be appointed . The worker was not appointed according to the procedure laid down . The worker was engaged to make the temporarily requirement of the bank so that the bank's activities do not suffer . Worker according to his own showing has not worked for 240 days before his termination and worker is not entitled for any relief. His termination was automatic on the expiration of the period for which he was employed and therefore the worker was not required to served any notice by the opposite party . According to the bank management the bank vide circular No. 42/ 87 dated 23-4-87 gave an opportunity to the workers who were temporarily employed by the bank and accordingly advertisement were given in the daily news papers throughout the country and after the selection of the suitable candidate workers were employed . It is also alleged that the worker has raised the dispute by the demand letter 2001 after a lapse of 16 years and therefore the claim is time barred . It is specifically clear from the appointment letters that the worker's services came to end on date mentioned therein and the worker after understanding well worked in the bank. It is admitted that the Hon'ble High Court passed the order in W.P. No. 45884/92 on 12-3-99 but it is alleged that the worker did not raise dispute within the period fixed by the Hon'ble High Court . It is stated in the order pased by the Hon'ble High Court that the worker should raise the dispute within the period of 2 months but the worker himself neglected it . The worker has twisted the facts for obtaining relief. It is also pointed out that in the circular No. 23-4-87 and subsequent letter No. F/3/ 104/87/ IR dt . 16-8-90 all those workers were 922
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] eligible who completed 90 days working or more after 1-1-83 and who were terminated by letter No. P/REI/PENP / 6 dated 22-10-90 and it is also alleged that Prem Singh is not eligible as he had not worked for 90 days or more . The management has therefore requested that issue may be decided against the worker .
The mangement has filed the following documents in support of his case :
1. Bank Circular No. PER/27/ 78 dt. 16-5-98 .
2. Bank Circular No. PER/66/79 dt . 12-11-79 .
3. Bank Circular No. PER/ 120/ 2000-2001 dit . 30-3-2001.
4. Bank Circular No. PER/24/87 dt. 12-3-87 .
5. Letter to Govt . of India dt . 16-8-90 .
6. Terms and conditions of Temporary Employees .
7. Bank Circular No. PERP/7E HP/ 6 dt. 22-12-96 .
8. Copy of notice English .
9. Copy of noticeHindi.
Jaipur circular No. PER/66/79 dated 12-11-79 which probhits the Branch Manager employed temporarily workman in service beyond 80 days . It is in light of the circular restriction has been imposed for employing the worker beyond the period of 80 days . Circular also prohibits to employ in subordinate cadre any person who is beyond 24 years of age from the photo copy of the application submitted by the worker for employment his date of birth as shows as 18-7-66 . Therefore he disqualified himself become even temporarily employee on 29-12-84 . Sri S.K. Suri , Branch Manager , State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur , Birhana Road, Kanpur has clearly stated in affidavit in para 7 that engagement of worker was not made by adopting prescribed procedure . As such on the basis of such engagement the worker cannot claim as back door entry in the bank and claim for regularisation . The said witness Sri Suri has not been cross examined on that statement . It is concluded on the basis of evidence produced by the parties thatthe worker has not completed 240 days of continuous workingbefore his termination . Therefore he cannot claim to get the notice from the employer or to get any retrenchment compensation .
10. Copy of notice publish in News Paper on 24-10-96.
11. Bank Circular No. PER/42/87 dt. 23-4-87.
The worker was employed for the fixed term and last day ofhis work has shows in the appointment letter is 18-3-95 . Therefore he stands terminated on 19-3-85 and no notice or compensation is needed in this regard .
12. Letter of Branch Manager address to personal .
13. Letter / application form for ex - temporary employees.
14. Bank Circular No. PER/ 41 /87 dt . 22-4-87.
15. Letter From Branch Manager to AGM.
The worker has been cross examined by the representative of the opposite party and the management has been cross examined by the worker's representative . Additional documents have also been filed by the management which are same as those filed by the worker from paper No. 4/2 to 4/5 .
Heard workman's representative . The opposite party representative could not be heard as he was absent asdate was fixed for argument .
The State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur vide circular No. PER/ 42/87 dt . 23-4-87 came forward with the scheme of absorbing ex - temporary employees and consequently meeting was called by the Jt . Secretary, Ministry of Finance , Deptt . of Economic Affairs , Banking Division on 29-9-88 . A committee consisted ofrepresentative of other banks including State Bank ofBikaner and Jaipur also represented and they finally came forward that those temporarily employees who have completed services of 90 days or more after cut of date i.e. 1-1-82 will only be eligible for considering under the scheme . This fact is based upon the documents filed by the management. From the photo copy of the application of the worker it is made out that he applied for absorption on 20-6-87 and it is found that he was not eligible therefore he was not absorbed in the services . It is noteworthy that worker has not challenged his absorption on the above ground that he was qualified to be considered for absorption and he was not absorbed.
On the discussions above I come to the conclusion thatworker stands automatically terminated on the period 19-3-85 as he was appointed upto 18-3-85 alone . He has not put in 240 days of service before his termination and therefore opposite party is not liable to give him notice or compensation for terminating his services. The termination oftheworkerPrem Singh w.e.f. 19-3-85 is legal andjustified and accordingly issue is answered . Worker is not entitled forany relief.
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer
Lucknow 17-12-2004
It is not disputed that the worker was engaged by appointment letters the photo copies of letters has been filedby the parties . From the appointment letters it reveals that the worker has not completed 90 days of working. It is false to say that the worker was engaged on 28-12-84 as the appointment letter itself shows that he was appointed w.e.f. 29-12-84. The worker has tried to put false facts in hisstatement of claim and affidavit that he was engaged to work from 28-12-84 . It cannot be said that he does not know English and knows Hindi only . Because dates in Hindi Typewriter is also written in English only . He himself alleged that he worked as Peon/ Chowkidar therefore he ought to have known the conditions of the appointment letter. Photo copy of experience certificate which has been produced by the worker also goes to prove that he worked for aperiod of 80 days from 29-12-84 to 18-3-85. Не cannot come forward with the false story . There is photocopy of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, H.O.
923
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 290.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. नं. 2/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/ 314/2000- आई. आर. ( वि-1 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 S.O. 290.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( I.D. No. 2/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012/314/2000- IR(B.1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT :
SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer
L.D. No. 2/2001 Ref. No.L - 12012/314/2000/IR(B - 1 ) dated 29-12-2000 BETWEEN :
Shri Adarsh Vastavai
S/o Late Sh . Avinash Chander , H. No. 5/41 , G.P.O. Pratappura, Agra (U.P .)- 282001 .
AND
1. The Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India , Chipitola, Agra (U.P .) -282001 .
2. The Deputy General Manager , State Bank of India , ZonalOffice,
Sanjay Place, Agra, (U.P .) - 282001.
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide their Order No. L- 12012/314/2000/ IR(B - 1 ) dated 29-12-2000 referred the following dispute to the Presiding Oficer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Lucknow for adjudication .
"Whether the action of the management of Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India , Agra in terminating the services of Shri Adarsh Vastavai with effect from 9-7-1999 is legal and jujstified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "
The worker's case in brief is that he was employed inState Bank of India Chipitola , Agra w.e.f. 31-12-96 and he continued working till 9-7-1999 . The worker's job involved cleaning of office tables , make available drinking water carrying registers from one table to another and taking out files and placing again, besides this he was also carrying dak to other branches and thus, he performed the duties of peon . It is alleged that during course of his service he was deprived of all facilities available to the class IV employees . The worker on 21-6-99 approached through union for regularisation . However , the same was withdrawn on the ground that after the termination the case of regularisation is not maintainable . It is also alleged thatthe employer has not observed provisions contained in Section 25F , G & H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is also alleged that other persons such as Sanjay Kumar and Surender , who were employed in other branches of bank have been regularised and transferred to other branches of the bank . Therefore , the worker has requested that it maybe held that the termination dated 9-7-1999 is illegal and unjustified . The worker has further prayed that he be reinstated with full back wages .
The opposite party bank has filed the writen statement and has denied the claim of the worker. It is alleged that worker, Adarsh Vastavai is not the regularly appointed employee . It is alleged that there are prescribed procedure forappointment of a worker in the existing vacancy. While giving details of procedure it is alleged that for filling of the vacancy in the Bank, the posts are advertised and the candidates whose names are registered in employment exchange are considered, selection committee is formed and the candidates who qualify the terms and conditions of employment are called for interview and a list is prepared in respect of selected candidates . Thereafter , bank management appoints the candidates from the selected list and appointment letter are issued . After appointment such candidates are kept on probation for a period of 6 months and after successful completion of probation period they areconfirmed. It is also alleged that by virtue of this case the worker wants the back door entry in the bank service. It is alleged that Sh. Adarsh Vastavai was supplying the water on contract basis along with Sh. Krishna Gopal Mishra , Satish Kumar and Mahavir , and during the period 97 to 99 the payments were made in respect of the contract in the following manner :
Krishna Gopal Mahavir Satish "Adarsh Vastavai
Dec. 97
February 98
April98 April99
ForJan. 99
March 98
Jan. 98 May 98 Sept. 98
July 98
Oct. 98
Aug. 98
Jan. 99
Nov. 98
April99
For
March 99"
The bank management has denied that the worker at allworked till 9-7-99 as peon as alleged by him. The worker was mainly supplying the water, though he was also entrusted with certain casual work for which he was paid labour charges . It is also alleged that worker filed a case before ALC ( C) , Kanpur but after filing of written statement 924
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
workers Krishna Gopal , Satish Kumar and Adarsh Vastavai etc. , paper No. 6/ 17-6/ 18.
13. Application of Krishna Gopal and others addressed to DGM SBI , paper No. 6/19 .
14. Application of Saish Pal Singh and others addressed to ALC ( C) , Agra , paper No. 6/20.
The worker has filed the affidavits paper Nos . 3 & 5 and 7 & 8. The opposite party has filed the affidavit , paper No. 11. The bank has cross - examined the worker and his witness , Tej Pal Singh , whereas , the worker's representative has cross - examined the management witness Raj Kumar .
on behalf ofbran the worker withdrew his claim. The worker has concocted the fact should stated as to at what rate how much amount was paid to him per month . It is specifically been denied that worker was ever engaged for peon work . It is alleged that after 8-9-99 , the contract work was not taken from the worker . It is also alleged that worker is not entitled to the provisions of Section 25F, G & H as he was not an employee of the bank during the alleged period . It is also alleged that there is no provision for regularisation of services of any employee in the bank. Allegation about recruitment of Sanjay Kumar , Surendra and Shiv Ram it is alleged that they have been appointed after complying prescribed procedures of the Bank .
Partieshave filed written argument.
Accordingly the bank management has prayed that claim ofworker be rejected.
The worker has however , filed the rejoinder . It has been denied that the worker worked in capacity of contractor as the management has not disclosed the conditions of the contract, not referred any licence in respect of contract . The worker has reiterated his allegation thathe worked as peon for which he was qualified and he was illegally terminated without showing any cause or notice on 7-9-99 .
The worker has filed the photo copies of following
documents :
1. Notice purported to have been published somewhere , paper No. 6/3-6/5 .
2. Banker's cheque dated 1-1-99 for 3600 payable to Adarsh Contractor , Paper No. 6/6 .
3. Banker's cheque for Rs . 300 dt . 1-2-99 in favour of Adarsh Contractor , paper No. 6/7.
4. Application of Adarsh , requesting for the payment of charges for the month of January, paper No. 6/8 .
5. A certificate in respect of one Satish Kumar. Printed extract showing the payment to Satish Contractor , Shiv Ram Contractor , Mahavir Contractor. Surendra Singh , Contractor , paper No. 6/9-6/10 .
6. Application of Krishna Gopaldt . 23-6-97 for payment of labour charges of Rs . 60 regarding cleaning of water tank, paper No. 6/11 .
7. Banker's cheque , the date of which is not legible for payment of 3600 to the person whose name is not legible , paper No. 6/12 .
Worker'srepresentative has written in his written argument that the worker has denied to have worked as contractor and the worker has stated in cross - examintion that he was appointed as casual labour and Sh . Tej Pal Singh , the witness of the worker has also corroborated this fact that worker, Adarsh Vastavai was working on 31-12-96 as peon . Sh. Tej Pal Singh has also supported the claim that worker was performing the duties ofpeon . Sh. Tej Pal Singh also denied that there was any contractor in the bank not any official employee was engaged . It is within his agreement that the worker was terminated on 9-7-99 . Tej Pal Singh also stated in cross - examination that from 31-12-96 to 9-7-99 the worker continuously worked and the management has appointed someone else in his place . On the other hand the management has argued that Sh . Tej Pal Singh who was in the subordinate cadre cannot derive knowledge about the nature of the appointment on engagement of the concerned workmen . The statement made by Sh. Tej Pal Singh and Sri Mahavir Singh favouring the concerned workman and contrary to the statement of the bank management are denied . It is further denied that February 2002 is the experience certificate , it is also undated and in as much as it appears that the said annexure relates to some curfew pass for the issuance of which alleged Branch Manager has or had no authority . Accordingly, the said letter is a fabricated document . For the work rendered by Shri Mahavir Singh and others there was no need of any written agreement nor the job which he did, require any written agreement , on the contrary , according to norms , settlements , awards and Rules of the bank appointment letter for the engagement as claimed by the concerned workman was necessary and since the worker was not appointed regularly the question of issuing any appointment letter did not arise . It is argued that the workman has failed to prove his case .
8. Application of Krishna Gopal for payment of supply ofwater, paper No. 6/13 .
9. Another application of Krishna Gopal in respect of the labour and fair charges of Rs . 70 paper No. 6/14.
10. SBI paper with respect to payment to Krishna Gopal , Mahavir Contractor, paper No. 6/15 .
The worker has stated in affidavit , paper No. 7/2 para 5 that he never worked as a contractor under contract . It is also stated in para 7 of the affidavit , paper No. 7/3 that for payment the coercive methods were exercised for obtaining the'parchi ' . It is also mentioned in affidavit that in all he has filed 14 documents the original of which is in the possession of the bank.
11. Another list showing payment to Krishna Gopal , Mahavir , Satish , paper No.6/ 17 .
On analysing the papers filed by the worker, if find that the banker's cheque is in the name of Adarsh Contractor. It cannot be said that banker's cheque was 12. Application of the trade union , INTUC addressed to LLC ( C), Kanpur for regularising the service of
14 925 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/ माघ 2, 1926
The bank management has produced the Assistant Manager of the main branch of SBI who has been dealing with the files of the case . He has in his affidavit has stated that he is conversant with the case and acquainted himself with the relevant records .
The witness of the bank has proved that for the purpose of recruitment on various posts right from the posts of messenger, peon, farrash and cash collie etc. which are commonly known as class IV employees or subordinte staff procedure is prescribed which includes the advertisement of posts and also calling the names from employment exchange and interview of the eligible candidates . For the subordinate staff the maximum education qualification is High School fail and not High School pass , besides , other conditions such as mimimum age etc. are also prescribed . After the candidates are selected for appointment they are given appointment on probation and successful completion of probation period and if there is nothing adverse against such candidate he isconfirmed.
The management has also prove that the worker never under gone any such aforesaid procedure for recruitment nor was appointed on any post .
issued in respect of the wages . The status of the worker is mentioned in the banker's cheque as contractor . If it is taken to be the genuine document then at the back of this cheque the signatures of Adarsh contractor is visible. Similarly there is also another photo copy of document which is banker's chequeand it is found that same is issued in favour ofAdarsh contractor, which goes to show that he was performing the duty of apetty contractor. It cannot be termed as he served w.e.f. January 89 and February 99 as an employee . It cannot be said that the bank shall be reserve coercive method with theworkman to issue the wages in form of contract. Similarly, there is another document purported to be regarding supply of water, which is signed by Adarsh contractor. This is a document which is admission on part of worker that the natureofpayment he was receiving is of a contractor. Similarly the photostat copy of document, paper No. 6/10 also shows the payment to various contractors which clearly shows the reasons for payment . The another photo copy , paper No. 6/11 is for specific job of cleaning the water tank for which Rs. 50/- was to be paid . Thus, all the documents filed by the worker do not go to show that he was an employee of the bank. All the documents stated above goes to show that status of the worker , Adarsh Vastemai was not of a worker instead he was contracted for supply of water . The notice of SBI purported of the published somewhere also doesnot describe that the worker was and employee of the bank . There is worker's own admission in cross - examination that he was not engaged after April , 99 for which he has not complained anybody . The Presiding Officer ofthe court put specific question to the worker for which he replies as follows
The Asstt . Manager of the bank has also proved thatthe worker used to serve water to the employees and officers of the bank but not as a regular employee in any capacity nor he discharged any such duties during the period 31-12-1996 to 9-7-99 . The management witness has stated that the worker was deputed by the contractor for supply of water and removing waste papers but not throughout the aforesaid period and in any case he was never engaged by the Bank or in connection with its work for240 days or more continuously during a calendar year.
" प्र.: Payments दिनांकित 1-1-99, 1-2-99 तथा प्रार्थना पत्र दिनांक 3-4-99 पर आदर्श ठेकेदार लिखो है , तो क्या आप ठेकेदार थे ? "
उ: मैं ठेकेदार नहीं था । वो लिखवाकर ले जाता था तो कहा जाता था कि ठेकेदार लिखो नहीं तो भुगतान नहीं होगा । इसीलिए ठेकेदार लिख देता था ।
correctness in workers statement in cross examination is clear यह सही है कि अप्रैल के बाद मुझ से काम नहीं लिया गया । "
To another question from the management's representative the worker has stated :
मैंने ठेकेदार लिखाने के बारे में कोई शिकायत लिखित रूप से नहीं किया । सभी से ठेकेदार लिखाते थे । "
The witness of the bank has stated in affidavit that allegations made in claim statement are concocted , hence denied. He has also stated that Sh . Krishan Gopal Mishra , Satish Kumar and Mahavir also used to work as contractor and whenever need for engaging any one of them arose they were engaged . Payments were made to the claimant and aforesaid persons not as the 3 employees of the Bank butwhenever contract was given to them the payment for said contract of supply of water and removal of waste papers (kura) was made to the contractor . It is also proved that at no point of time the worker was even treated as an employee of the bank nor he was given any salary or allowances etc. admissible to bank employees .
The reference is whether the termination of the workman w.e.f. 9-7-99 is legal and justified. It is taken for argument sake then also the worker never worked after April , 99. Therefore , the worker's termination on 9-7-99 is unwarranted . the worker's own affidavit alleging that the workerworked up to 9-7-99 is false and on this context the worker cannot be believed that the worker was working as worker and not as contractor .
The management witness has also proved that the payment was never made to the worker through establishment register of the bank as the said register is meant for regularly appointed employees of the bank. Regarding the appointment of Sanjay Kumar and others he has stated that Sanjay Kumar , Surendra and Shiv Ram had undergone the prescribed process of recruitment and after their selection they were recruited and posted at various places while the concerned workman never went through such a process .
So far as statement of Tej Pal Singh is concerned he has availed voluntary retirement and that is why he has no interest with the Bank . On the one hand the worker himself states that he was engaged up to April, 99 but Tej PalSingh states in affidavit that worked up to 9-7-99, shows the clear falsehood on the part of Tej Pal Singh .
The worker has not filed any document to prove thathewas working since December , 96. I have carefully gone through the letter of INTUC addressed to ALC ( C) , 109 Gl /2005-34 926
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2 , 1926
Kanpur in which at page 2 it is written as if he has worked from 98 to May 99. Later on it was amended as 96 to 1-6-99. This is another circumstance which shows that the allegation of the worker that he worked from 31-12-96 to 9-7-99 is not true . The notice advertised by SBI is of no avail to the worker as it is related to calling of application from those who worked till 30-5-91 . Worker admittedly was not in employment prior to 91. Why the worker has filed these notices is not explained.
From the evidence on record I come to the conclusion that the worker has utterly failed to prove that he worked even as casual worker from 31-12-96 to 9-7-99 as alleged by him in the statement of claim . He has also failed to prove that he worked for 240 days prior to his disengagement . Therefore there is no question of giving any notice or showing any cause for his disengagement and it is also not proved that any one else is appointed on his place. On the other hand the management has proved that the worker was engaged for some time to clean the garbage and supply of the water for some period on contract . From the worser's own statement it is made out that he was not working after April , 99. Therefore , the termination of services of the worker, Adarsh Vastanai on 9-7-99 does not ariese . The issue is answered accordingly and the worker is not entitled to any relief.
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer 20-12-2004 Lucknow
नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर , 2004
का.आ. 291.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्धनियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 101/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011/147/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 S.O. 291. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref . 101/2003 of the Central Government Industrial Tribubal- cum - Labour Court. Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12011 / 147 /2003 - IR( B -I1 ) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT : SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 .
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] REFERENCE No. 101 OF 2003
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management ofRegional Manager , UCO Bank and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. B. Prasad , State Secretary, UCO Bank Employees' Association, Exhibition Road , Patna .
Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. P. K. Chatterjee, Autho . Representative.
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Banking Dated, Dhanbad, the 12th December , 2004 AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the I. D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12011/ 147/2003 - IR(B - II ) dated 3-10-2003 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank in not regularising the services of Shri Hira Das is legal andjustified? If not, what relief workman is entitled to ? "
2. The care the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring Union on his behalf in brief is as follows :-
The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman Hira Das was orally appointed by the management of UCO Bank Jawra Branch to discharge the duties of Peon and Sweeper from 22-9-89 . After his appointment the concerned workman was engaged in erforming the following duties:-
(i) Sweeping the branch premises, cleaning bath room , chairs , tables .
(ii) Taking out ledgers , registers from the Almirah placing the same on tables /counters and vice-versa.
(iii) Taking out Cash Box from the strong room , placing the same in cash Department and Vice-versa .
(iv) Posting of mails , distribution of dak through Peon book .
(v) Stitching of vouchers/ currency notes as per requirement.
(vi) Serving water/ tea to the members of staff.
(vii) Carrying token , book , scroll register from Accounts Department to Cash Department and vice - versa .
Hisduty hours covered from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. every day and sometimes beyond that period. They submitted [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
that the concerned workman while was posted at Jawra branch management used to pay him Rs. 60 weekly as his wages through vouchers. They submitted further that following an administrative decision the said Jawra branch of the Bank was merged with Bounsi Branch with effect from 30-3-2000 and thereafter the services of the concerned workman was utilised by the Bounsi branch of the Bank in the same capacity as mentioned above from 10.00 A.M. to 6.00 P.M. on week days and from 10.00 A.M. to 3.00 P.M. on Saturdays and sometimes beyond that period as per local requirements . While he was posted at Bounsi branch the management started paying him wages @ Rs . 55 per day through vouchers . They alleged that in spite of discharging duties of Peon continuously and since the date ofhis joining management did not consider necessary to regularise him as Peon. Even management refused to paywages during Sundays and holidays and also deprived him the Bonus facilities . In spite of submitting representation to the management as no fruitful result yielded the sponsoring Union raised an Industrial Dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication by the Ministry . The sponsoring Union accordingly submitted their prayer to pass award directing the management to regularise the concerned workman in the service of Peon- cum-Farash along with other benefits which he is entitled to get .
3.Management on the contrary after filing Written Statement-cum-Rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring Union asserted in their Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman.
They submitted that UCO Bank Employees ' Association is a branch of the All India UCO Bank EmployeesFederation having its office at 10 BTM Sarni 2nd Floor, Calcutta- 1 . The said federation filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on behalf of empanelled casual workers working at different branches of India for regularisation in service pursuant to the agreement dated 12-10-1989 with the recognised Union . By the said agreement it was agreed upon to absorb casual workers working continuously for 240 days during the period of three years immediately proceeding the settlement . In accordance with the said settlement the persons entitled for being absorbed in terms of settlement upon making application they would be empanelled and the empanelled casual workers would be absorbed in the available vacancies that might arise in future. They submitted that as per the said agreement 460 workers of the Bank were empanelled in regular vacancies of the subordinate staff and such empanelment was completed in the year 1990. They disclosed that according to that settlement only empanelled 69 casual workers have been absorbed. They disclosed that Ministry of Finance , Government of India in 1984 advised all public sector Banks to the effect that no additional post should be created and
927
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
also the existing vacancies including consequential vacancies arising out of retirement, resignation , death or promotion should not be filled up. Again the Reserve Bank of India created a ban on recruitment of staff including replacement for retirement , resignation in the year 1996- 97. The Hon'ble High Court , Calcutta by order dt . 4-8-1999 passed in W.P. No. 1390 of 1990 held that in view of restriction imposed by the Reserve Bank of India the Bank cannot absorb the said casual worker . Hon'ble Court furtherdirected the authority not to fill up any post until those casual workers are being absorbed in the substantive post. In spite of such directions UCO Bank Employees ' Association raised industrial dispute for regularisation of Shri Mukesh Kumar Rao and Satya Narain Prasad Gupta . But the Ministry of Labour in both the cases declined to make any reference by order dt. 9-9-2002 and 30-9-2002. Thereafter the said Association again raised two more disputes for Uday Shankar Raut and Shyamanand Maholi butthe same also was rejected by the Ministry of Labour and for which they did not consider necessary to make any reference . Management submitted that even refusal of four disputes by the Ministry of Labour , Government of India the UCO Bank Employees ' Association raised the present clispute for regularisation by demanddt . 22-10-2002 knowing fully well ofthe fact that they are debarred from raising such dispute in view of judgment ofthe Hon'ble High Court , Calcutta referred to above . They further submitted that the concerned workman was engaged as casual part time Sweeper and for which he was paid consolidated wages fixed for the category as per the circular of the Bank dt . 19-10-1989. Accordingly the claim of the concerned workman for his regularisation as Peon - cum- Farash is not maintainable as per the terms and conditions . In view of the facts and circumstances managem ent submitted prayer to pass Award rejecting the claim of the sponsoring Union.
4. POINTS TO BED ECIDED
"Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank in n ot regularising the services of Shri Hira Das isi legal and justified ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"
5. FINDING WITH RIEASONS
It transpires from the recrod that the sponsoring Union with a view to substant iate their claim examined the concerned workman as Witness being WW- 1 . Management also in support. of their claim examined one witness as MW - 1 . It is the specific claim of the sponsoring Union that the concerned workman on 25-9-1989 was engaged at Jawra Branch as Sweeper . WW- 1 during his evidence disclosed that said Jaywra Branch thereafter was merged with Bounsi Branch and after merger he also was engaged to work there . The document marked as Ext . W- 1 shows that Jawra branch , Identification No. 1475 was merged with Bouns Branch Identification No. 720 on 31-3-2000 in view o circular i sued by the ma:
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 928
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
dt . 4-4-2000 . Therefore , it is clear that after merger there is no existence of Jawra branch where the concerned workman was initially engaged. It is further seen that since 25-9-1989 till the date of merger the concerned workman was engaged as Sweeper at Jawra branch. It is the contention of the concerned workman that though he was engaged as Part-time Sweeper as part of his job he used to perform the following duties:-
(1) Sweeping the branch premises , cleaning bath room chairs , tables .
Peon . This witness further admitted that as per award of the Tribunal three workmen viz . Ramesh Chandra Prasad , Surendra Yadav and Vijay Kumar have already been regularised. This witness disclosed that actually their names were not empanelled previously and after Award their names were empanelled and they were regularised. He disclosed further that those three workmen were regularised by the management as they worked as full time casual workers from the very beginning . This witness further admitted that one daily rated worker Ramesh Prasad Tanti was regularised as Peon and posted at Sono Branch .
(II) Taking out ledgers , registers from the Almirah placing the same on tables/ counters and viceversa.
Considering the evidence of WW - 1 and MW - 1 I find sufficient reason to hold that the concerned workman started working under the management since 25-9-1989 .
(
III) Taking out Cash Box from the strong room placing the same in cash Department and viceversa.
(
IV) Posting of mails , distribution of dak through PeonBook .
(V) Stitching of vouchers/ currency notes as per requirement .
(VI) Serving water/tea to the members of staff.
(VII) Carrying token book, scroll register from Accounts Department to Cash Department and vice - versa .
His duty hour was from 9.00 A.M. to 6.00 P.М. Не disclosed further that when he was engaged at Jawra branch by the management he used to draw his wages@ Rs . 180 weekly . It is his specific claim that he performs his duties and carries on his work like that of the job of permanent Peon . He further disclosed that since hisjoining continuously he is working under the management. But in spite ofrendering his continuous service management did not consider necessary to regularise him in service and for which he raised industrial dispute with a view to get his relief. This witness during cross - examination admitted that though he was engaged as part time sweeper he was unable to maintain time as under instruction of the management he had to reinain on duty in the Bank for the whole day . It is really peculiar to note that MW - 1 was allowed to be examined on the part of the management though he never was posted either at Jawara Branch or at Bounsi Branch under the management . Naturally it was not possible for him to highlight actually under which circumstance the concerned workman was engaged as Part-time sweeper and if thereafter he was asked to perform jobs like that of permanent Peon . This witness admitted during his cross - examination that Manager of the Branch was competent officer and not he himself to highlight the claim of the management in the matter of engagement of the concerned workman . This witness also has failed to disclose if Bounsi Branch where the concerned workman isnow working is running without Peon since long years and also whether the concerned workman have been entrusted by the Branch Manager to perform the job of
Ithas also been admitted by the concerned workman that though he was engaged as Part- time Sweeper he used to perform the duties of Peon under direction of the management and for which he had to remain on duty during full official hours of the Bank . The concerned workman during evidence relied on the document marked as Ext . W- 1 which shows receipt of his wages from the management on weekly basis as part - time Sweeper @ Rs . 55 per day . The document marked as Ext . W - 1 shows the payment of wages to the concerned workman with effect from 1-12-2001 to 26-10-2002 . The document marked asExt . W- 1 / 1 shows order of the Bank relating merger of Jawra Branch with Bounsi branch. The document marked as Ext . W - 1 /2 shows that Manager, Bounsi branch requested the Regional Office , Bhagalpur for passing favourable order in favour of the part-time Sweeper i.e. the concerned workman . Ext . W - 1 /3 is the recommendation made by the Branch Manager , Jawra branch requesting the Regional Office , Bhagalpur to engage the concerned workman as Part-time Sweeper at Jawra Branch . The document marked as Ext . W - 1 /4 is in response to letter issued by the Dy. Chief Officer ( Personnel) Zonal Office , Patna, the Manager , Jawra Branch sent bio -data in respect of the concerned workman for consideration . The particulars in respect of the concerned workman sent by the Manager , Jawra Branch marked as Ext . W - 1 /7 . The document marked as Ext . W - 1 /8 shows that the Manager JawraBranch requested the Regional Manager , Bhagalpur to confirm the concerned workman in the post of part-time sweeper . Again vide letter dt . 22-2-2002 Manager , Bounsi branch requested the Regional Manager . Bhagalpur to pass necessary order in favour of the concerned workman stating that the concerned workman since the merger of Jawra branch with Bounsi branch working as temporary part-time Sweeper for his placement as permanent part- time Sweeper in place of Ganesh Harijan . In the said letter it has also been disclosed that the Area of the Bank premises where the concerned workman is working is 2200 Sqft and that Ganesh Harijan has already got his promotion asPeon- cum- Farash . By letter marked as Ext. W - 1 / 13 addressed to the ALC ( C) management disclosed that 929
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
cum -Farash . This letter therefore shows clearly that at Bounsi branch Ganesh Harijan was a part - time Sweeper but as he got his promotion as Peon-cum-Farash the concerned workman discharging the duties of Ganesh Harijan in addition to his own duties as part - time Sweeper . It has also been exposed that as Ganesh Harijan has got hispromotion as Peon - cum-Farash, it is clear that Bounsi branch is equipped with a Peon . Therefore question of discharging the duties of the concerned workman as Peon at Bounsi branch finds no basis just relying on the submission of the representative of the concerned workman. However, it is clear considering materials on record that the concerned workman since 1989 continuously is working as temporary part - time Sweeper under the management . In course of hearing management relied on the circular marked as Ext . M- 1 / 10 relating to policyandprocedure concerning selection , appointment and promotion in respect of full time Sweeper and part- time Sweeper . As per the said circular dt . 16-2-82 Part-time Sweepers are recruited through open notification displayed on the notice board of the branch/office for which such recruitment is made under the strict supervision and control of the Divisional Office in consonance with the relevant provisions of AGM/DM Circulalr No. 4780 dt . 21-10-80 to be read with the provision of AGM/DM circular letter No. 27/81dt . 22-8-81 . Candidate possessing higher educational qualification than class VI pass are not eligible for such posts . On the contrary Selection of full time Sweepers is made out of the existing part - time sweepers strictly on seniority basis ascertained townwise or city- wise to fill up vacancy as and when it arises in any of the branches/offices in the area in question .
though the name of the concerned workman was not empanelled as casual worker he is working as Temporary part time worker and at present he is drawing wages @Rs. 55 /- per day as per circulardt . 22-12-98 . Disclosing this fact management submitted that the services of the concerned workman cannot be considered for regularisation as per direction of the Hon'ble High Court Kolkata in Writ Petition No. 1390 of 1988. Stating this fact management further disclosed that the Bank authority may consider the case of the petitioner and shall absorb rest of the casual worker as and when such restrictions are lifted by the Reserve Bank of India . The document marked as Ext. W - 1 / 15 and Ext. W- 1/ 16 are the certificates issued by theBranch Manager Bounsi branch wherein it was certified that the concerned workman was engaged as worker on dailywages basis from 22-9-89 till 30-4-2003 . It has also been exposed from the document marked as Ext . W- 1 /14 that the concerned workman belonged to SC Community . Considering all the documents as mentioned above it is clear that the concerned workman initially was engaged aspart - time Sweeper at Jawra branch in the year 1989 and thereafter on merger of the said branch with Bounsi branch he also was allowed to work there as temporary part-time Sweeper by the management . It is the contention of the representative of the concerned workman that in disguise of temporary part time Sweeper the management is utilising the services of the concerned workman as Peon at Bounsi branch and he performs all the jobs of Peon during the business hours of the Bank . The representative of the concerned workman further submitted that MW - 1 was not competent enough to disclose the status and position of the concerned workman in the matter of discharging his duties at Bounsi Branch when this witness was never posted in the said branch . MW - 1 during his evidence admitted the fact that he was never posted either at Jawra Branch or at Bounsi branch . Therefore, there is reason to draw conclusion that it was not possible on his part to highlight actually which nature ofjob the concerned workman used to perform and performs either at Jawra Branch or at Bounsi branch . When no such positive information relating to nature of work performed by the concerned workman has been revealed from the evidence of MW- 1 , in natural course the question which will crop up is whether the management exploiting the concerned workman used to take his service as Peon though he was engaged as temporary part - time Sweeper . Before coming into conclusion to this fact let me consider the document marked as Ext . W - 1 /9 which the concerned workman relied in support of his claim . This official document was issued undersignature of the Manager , Bounsi branch addressed to the Regional Manager Bhagalpur. From this document it transpires clearly that the concerned workman was engaged as temporary part -time Sweeper since 1989 and for which he made recommendation for his permanent placement inpart-time Sweeper in place of Ganesh Harijan, Part-time Sweeper who has got his promotion as Peon-
The said circular has made further provision for Full time Sweeper in connection with their appointment as Peon/ Peon- cum-Farash will also apply to part -time Sweeper for their selection to the post of Peon/Peon- cum-Farash provided that they have passed 8th/ 9th standard from a recognised school after joining the service in the Bank. Therefore, this provision speaks clearly that for part -time Sweeper there is scope to get his promotion in the post of Peon/Peon-cum- Farash subject to fulfilment of the criteria as mentioned in the said circular . It is clear in view of my discussion above that the concerned workman continuously for more than 14 years is discharging his duties as part-time sweeper . The concerned workman during his evidence disclosed categorically that apart from his discharging his duty as part- time Sweeper under instruction of the management he also performs different duties as mentioned above like that of Peon and for doing so he has to remain in the office everyday during full office hours. This part of his averment was not denied by the management . Therefore , it is clear that though the concerned workman has failed to establish that he was officially designated to work as Peon actually performs his duties of like nature in addition to his duty as part -time Sweeper without any extra remuneration only for the 930
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
interest of the Bank under direction of the local authority.
Therefore, it is clear that to discharge the function ofPeon- cum- Farash/ Peon he has got sufficient experience . The representative of the management submitted that part -time Sweeper must possess qualification of 8th / 9th Standard from a recognised school after joining in the service of the Bank before claiming his promotion as Peon/Peon - cum- Farash. As per the circular I find no dispute that minimum qualification for getting promotion in the post of Peon/Peon- cum - Farash from the post of Part -time Sweeper is 8th/ 9th Standard from a recognised school . The representative of the management submitted that as per bio -data furnished bythe concerned workman his qualification is passed Class- IV ( Ext . W - 1 /7 ) . The concerned workman is a member of Scheduled Caste community. It is seen that the concerned workman for the last 14 years is woking in the capacity of temporary part- time sweeper but simultaneously he also discharging his duties as Peon though not designated as Peon . The management definitely would not allow him to work as such if his services was not satisfactory . In such circumstances there is sufficient reason to hold that by virtue of his acquiring long experience he has proved his efficiency to work as Peon . Therefore, qualification as earmarked in the circular issued by the management I hold should not be considered as a strict criteria to be fulfilled particularly in the instant case when the concerned workman also belongs to a member of Scheduled Caste community.
Accordingly I consider that the concerned workman has acquired his eligibility for empanelling his name for getting the promotion of Peon/Peon- cum-Farash.
The representative of the management submitted that Reserve Bank of India by circular marked as Ext . M - 1 / I banned further recuritment of Staff ( including replacement for retirement, resignation , etc. ) except recruitment of specialised probationary officer with the prior approval of RBI/ Govt . of India . The representative of the management submitted that the sponsoring union filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court, Kolkata for regularisation of empanelled staff as per settlement entered into between the union and the management . Hon'ble Court relying on the direction of the Reserve Bank of India dismissed the Writ Petition No. 1390/98 marked as Ext . M - 1 /2 . The representative of the management further subinitted that even Ministry of Labour also refused to make reference in respect of some workers relying on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court , Kolkata in Writ Petition No. 1390/98 marked as Ext . M - 1 / 5 to M - 1 / 8 . Considering the circular as mentioned above I find no dispute to hold that Reserve Bank of India imposed restriction upon the management in the matter of fresh recruitment of any workman under UCO Bank . The representative of the concerned workman on the contrary relying on the annual report for 2002-2003 published by the management submitted that the said restriction imposed upon UCO Bank is not in operation . In the annual
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]
report the management explained the Bank's performance which is as follows :-
" It is , indeed , a pleasure to place on record that the Bank has successfully completed its Medium Term Re- structuing Plan (MTRP) , 2000-03 with all round achievement in all areas of its operations . The Bank has achieved its main objective of the MTRP 2000-03 of consolidation and carrying forward of the achievements made under the Strategic Revival Plant ( SRP ) 1997-2000 and ensuring sustained profitablility . The year 2002-2003 marked the end of the Bank's struggle for survival and flagged of the Bank's march towards its Mission of becoming a 'Top Class Bank ' . The continuous profit of the Bank for four consecutive years has resulted in appreciation of efforts made by the Bank from the Regulators . i.e. Reserve Bank of India as well as the owners, Government of India . As a sequel to the performance shown by the Bank during the last few years , the Government of India has allowed 'Autonomy' to the Bank . This will enable the Bank inhaving operational freedom in direct recruitment, reassessment and creation of vacancies in various cadres up to Scale VI , etc. These shifts in the position of the Bank have put UCO Bank in league --with the Top Banks in the country . "
In the asid report it has been observed categorically thatGovt. of India has allowed " Autonomy " to the Bank . Thiswill enable the Bank in having operational freedom in direct recruitment , reassessment and creation of vacancies in Bank's cadres up to Scales VI etc. Therefor , it speaks clearly that as per autonomy declared by the Govt . of India management is equipped with that power to recruit their own staff up to Scale VI etc. If this fact is taken into consideration I should say that there is no hindrance on the part of the management to consider the case of the concerned workman for empanelling his name for the post ofPeon/Peon- cum- Farash when it has been established that the concerned workman ceaseleassly rendered his service as Temporary part - time Sweeper only but also his service was exploited by the local management for discharging his duty like that of Peon. I consider that as the concerned workman has got sufficient experience to work as Peon and particularly when he comes from scheduled caste community and also when there is no allegation that the job which he rendered was not to the satisfaction of the management the qualification earmarked for promotion in that category can be ignored . Accordingly after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances I hold that the name of the concerned workman should be empanelled for the post of Peon/Peon- cum-Farash for his regularisation in that post . In the result , the following Award is rendered:-
"The action of the management of UCO Bank in not regularising the service of Shri Hira Das not legal 931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
The point runs as hereunder : -
and justified. Consequently , the concerned workman should be empanelled for the post of Peon/Peon- cum-Farash for his regularisation in that post . "
2. Management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above.
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 292.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरिएण्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/58/2000- आई . आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004
"Whether the action of the General Manager , Oriental Bank of Commerce, Regional Office, Delhi , 8./1 , Abdul Aziz Road , WEA Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005 in not taking on duty to Sh . Ashok Kumar, Ex-Peon of Oriental Bank ofCommerce, G. T. Karnal Road Branch, Delhi. When he reported to duty after he was acquitted on 16-09-1998 of the offences reported by the bank in trial in criminal case No. 602/84 is justified legal and reasonable ? If not then what benefit and relief he is entitled to . " The workman has filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, it has been stated that the workman Ashok Kumar has been in the employment of Oriental Bank of Commerce and he wasworking as Peon in Branch, O.B.C. , G.T. Karnal Road, Delhi. Prior to his false implication in a false criminal case i.e. FIR No. 602/84 on 23-08-1984 along with another employees Sh . Prem Nath Peon. The workman Sh. Ashok Kumar has been acquitted in the aforesaid case by the Ld . Court of Sh . S.S. Handa , M.M. Delhi , vide its judgement dt. 16-09-1998 . (Photocopy of the judgement annexed) . It is further submitted that Ld. M.M. has observed in his judgement dt. 16-09-1998 " There was no evidence at all to connect any of the accused with the alleged offence . " Hence the judgement is self speaking .
S.O. 292. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 87/2000 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , New Delhi No. II as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-12-2004 .
[No. L- 12012/ 58/ 2000 - IR (B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN,
GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER: R. N. RAI . I.D. NO . 87/2000
That the workman Ashok Kumar was not allowed to join the duties neither during the trial nor after his acquittal from alleged offence , wherein he is exonerated, due to the reason best known to the management of the Oriental Bank of Commerce . Whereas , co - accused Prem Nath was not even placed under suspension during the trial and there is nothing on the record to make any dis- crimination in the matter between Ashok Kumar and Prem Nath, which is against the principle of natural justice . That the above action of the management is wholly illegal bad, unjust and malafide and anoints to unfair labour practice. That the above said action of the management has compelled the workman to live near starvation as he has to face great financial hardship and agony during the entire period due to his unemployment and he is only dependent on the mercy of his nears and dears during the aforesaid period.
IN THE MATTER OF : - Sh . Ashok Kumar , R/ o N - 13 / C - 1 , Janta Flats , Dilshad Garden , Delhi - 110095. Versus
The General Manager/ Chairman , Oriental Bank of Commerce . 8/1 , Abdul Aziz Road . W.E.A. Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005 .
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/58/ 2000/ IR (B - 11 ) Central Government Dt. 11-08-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication.
The management has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been stated that the brief facts of the case are that the claimant had been engaged as a temporary peon on 27-04-1984 on a leave arrangement and to tide over the temporary increase in work in place of a regular employee who had proceeded on leave . The claimant was fully aware of the temporary nature of his engagement. It is submitted that as per the provisions of para 20.7 and 20.8 of the Bipartite Settlement dt. 19-10-1966 , a temporary workman can be appointed for a limited period ofwork or in connection with temporary increase of work orinplace of temporary vacancy caused by the absence ofa permanent workman or to fill up a permanent vacancy subject to the provisions that such a temporary absence 932
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
shall not exceed a period of 3 months . It is also pointed out that as per the Govt . Guidelines for making regular appointments in the subordinate cadre of the management bank, an indent is placed before the Employment Exchange andthey in turn forward the list of eligible candidated from whom the selection is made. In view of the above facts , the claim filedby the claimant itself is ill founded and the very basis of the claim of the workman is liable to be rejected on this ground alone .
on a temporary basis for a specific period and that also was interrupted in between due to the arrest of the claimant by the police. The claimant was never appointed in the Bank in accordance with the recruitment procedure . He had only worked as a temporary /casual for a few days in the year 1984. The raising of the dispute now would seriously prejudice the case of the management as the relevant recordes/ evidence may not be available now . It is submitted that the reference deserves to be rejected.
TheManagement has denied most of the paras of the statement of claim. The workman applicant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder, he has reiterated the averments of his claim .
That the claim is stale and belated . The claimant worked in a casual / temporary vacancy for a few days in the bank in the year 1984 and the reference now made in 2000-2001 is apparently illegal and unjustified. The claimants cannot take advantage of a courtjudgement in a criminal case , though for all the years he was sleeping over his alleged rights . It is submitted that the reference may be rejected on the ground of delay /laches alone .
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman that the workınan applicant was a regular employee and he should be reinstated. An FIR was lodged against the workman applicant and Prem Nath . After acquittal Prem Nath was reinstated but discrimination was made against this workman applicant . He should also be regularised in view of the acquittal order dt . 16-09-1998 . The Hon'ble Trial Court has held that the balance ofbenefit goes in favour of the accused persons. It was submitted from the side of the management that the case of this workman cannot be taken at par with the case of the other workman who was reinstated . That workman was permanent employee whereas this workman was a temporary employee and he has hardly worked for 4 months . He was appointed on leave vacancy . The workman applicant has himself admitted that he was appointed in the bank on temporary basis . He was appointed for 89 days prior to that he worked for one month . As such , he haswoked for 89 days and prior to 89 days , he has worked for one month. As a whole , he has worked for less than 4 months . He has not completed 240 days according to his admission of his cross - examination so acquittal otherwise is not material in his case. He has not completed 240 days duty according to his own admission so Section 25 ( F ) of the ID Act is not attracted. The law cited by the workman applicant is not applicable in the facts and circumstances ofthis case .
The reference is replied thus :-
The action of the General Manager , Oriental Bank of Commerce, Regional Office, Delhi , 8/1 , Abdul Aziz Road, WEA Karol Bagh , New Delhi - 110005 in not taking on duty Sh . Ashok Kumar , Ex -Peon of Oriental Bank of Commerce , G.T. Karanl Road Branch , Delhi , when he reported to duty after he was acquitted on 16-09-1998 of the offences reported by the bank in trial in criminal case No. 602/84 is justified, legal and reasonable . The workman applicant does not deserve to get any benefit as prayed for .
It iswrong and emphatically denied that the claimant was in the employment of the management bank . The fact is that the claimant had been engaged as a temporary peon for a limited period of maximum 89 days and that during the tenure of temporary appointment he was arrested by the police. In view of this . even if the claimant had continued working with the bank prior to his arrest by the police , his services would have come to an end by efflux of time. i.e. 89 days or even earlier , i.e. consequent upon the employee having reported for duties in whose place Shri Ashok Kumar had been engaged. It is submitted that no right/ lien is generated in favour of the claimant and it is improper to equate his case with that of a permanent employee . It is wrong and emphatically denied that the claimant was engaged in false criminal case . The fact is that a fraud was attempted at the GT Karnal Road Branch ofthe management , where the claimant was engaged as a temporary peon and an FIR was lodged as per the rules with the police authorities and the police authorities suspected the involvement of the claimant. The fact is that the claimant never reported for duties after his arrest by the police . Moreover, the services of the claimant came to an automatic end because of temporary contractual engagement of 89 days over with the efflux of time . There has been no violation of principles of natural justice as has been alleged . The claimant has tried to build a false case in order to shape it as an Industrial Dispute where none exists . To suit his case . the claimant has tried to equate his case with that of Shri Prem Nath , who is a permanent employee of the Bank and who had been recruited through the Employment Exchange as per the policy of the bank , as has already explained above. It is again reiterated that the engagement of the claimant was purely temporary and was for a specific period , which ended in the year 1984 .
The award is given accordingly . Costs easy. Dt. 22-12-2004
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer .
However , it is submitted that since the claimant was not an employee of the management bank , his contentions cannot be acceded to . The claimant was engaged purely [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 293.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 22/94) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2004 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -12012/214/93- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
939
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 S.O. 293. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 22/94) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-12-04 .
The claimant has field statement of claim . In his statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman concerned was appointed as an Asstt . Cashier in clerical cadre in Central Bank of India in the year 1978 and his service conditions were governed by the provisions of the Sastry Award as modified by the Desai Award and aş further modified by the various Bipartite Settlements entered into from time to time between the management of various banks including Central Bank of India and their workman. That in the year 1981 when the workman was working at Press Area, New Delhi Branch of the Bank, he was placed under suspension by the management for having committed certain alleged acts of omissions/ commissions while posted at Shahbad Mohammedpur Branch of the Bank. This suspension was made with effect from 01-09-1981 . The Bank had instituted criminal proceedings against the workman in the same matters for which he was suspended which are still pending before a criminal court at Delhi .
[No. L- 12012/214/93 - IR(B - II) ]
C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR
COURT- IL,
RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE NEW DELHI
R. N. RAL
PRESIDING OFFICER :
I.D. NO . 22/94
IN THE MATTER OF :-
Sh. Ram Niwas Sharma,
R/ o WZ- 190, Mohalla Chotiyal,
Palam Village , Delhi - 110045.
VERSUS
The Dy . General Manager,
Central Bank of India ,
Zonal Office , Link Hauz , 4 ,
Bahadurshah Zafar Marg ,
New Delhi .
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 12012/ 214/93 - IR (B - II ) Central Government dt . 17-02-1994 has referred the following point for adjudication .
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India , New Delhi in dismissing Shri Ram Niwas Sharma . Assistant Cashier with effect from 14-01-1988 is justified ? If not, what relief, is the workman entitled to . ? " 109 G1 /2005-35
That about 5 years after the suspension of the workman the Regional Manager of the Bank at its Regional Office-B , Delhi issued a Memo dt . 25-06-1986 /01-08-1986 to the workman, making certain allegations against him in regard to having allegedly received an amount of Rs . 100/ from a RDS Account Holder in January, 1981 and not depositing the same in the Account of the said Account holder. The workman submitted a replydt . 10-10-1986 to the aforesaid memo , denying the allegations made therein . Copies of the said memo and reply of the workman are attached as annexures W/ 2 and W /2 hereto . That , in spite ofthe reply submitted by the workman , the Regional Manager issued a charge -sheet dt . 15-12-1986 to the workman with a simultaneous order therein that an inquiry would be held against him as he had not submitted any explanation to the memodt . 25-06-1986/ 01-08-1986 . This charge-sheet was followed by a corrigendum dt. 19-02-1987 stating that the narration in the charge- sheet. " In spite of sufficient time given to him , no explanation is offered by him till date ......... " may be substituted by the narration " Mr. Sharma's explanation dt. 10-10-1986 has not been found satisfactory . " Copies of the charge - sheet and corrigendum are attached as annexures W / 3 and W/ 4 respectively hereto.
That one Mr. Satish Chopra , who had been appointed as the Enquiry Officer to hold the inquiry against the workman simultaneously with the issuance of the charge- sheet on 15-12-1986 commenced the inquiry on 17-01-1987 , which was concluded on 14-05-1987 and after submission ofthe arguments by the Bank's Presiding Officer and the the Defence Representative of the workman , the Regional Manager/Disciplinary Authority issued to the workman a show cause memo of order of proposed punishment dt . 11-12-1987 which together with a copy of the findings of the Enquiry Officerdt . 26-09-1987 were delivered to the workman on 16-12-1987 . A copy of the show cause memo/ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
934
order of proposed punishment is attached , as annexure W/ 5 hereto . That the workman appeared before the Disciplinary Authority on 11-01-1988 and in the hearing held before him on that date , the workman filed his submissions in reply to the show cause memo/order of proposed punishment , where after the Displinary Authority passed a final order dt. 16-01-1988 awarding and imposing upon the workman the punishment of dismissal from service as already proposed in the show cause memo dt . 11-12-1987 . Copies of the submissions made by the workman before the Disciplinary Authority on 11-01-1988 and the final order passed by the Disciplinary Authority on 16-01-1988 are attached as annexureW /6 and W/7 hereto .
That the workman then preferred an appeal dt . 03-03-1988 before the Deputy General Manager/Appellate Authority at the Zonal Office , New Delhi of the Bank , which was heard on 3rd May , 1988 , but was rejected by the Appellate Authority by an order dt. 14-09-1988 , a copy ofwhich is attached and marked as annexure W /8_hereto . That the workman . aggrieved by the action of the management , raised an Industrial Dispute in the matter before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) New Delhi , but the conciliation proceedings initiated by the Assistant Labour Commissioner ended in failure of any settlement and the Government referred the dispute thereafter to this Hon'ble Tribunal for adjudication vide its order dt . 17-02-1994 .
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
at B / o Shahbad mohd . Pur within stipulated period . Thereafter another memos dt. 14-09-1981 and 13-02-1982 were issued to Shri Sharma. It is stated that despite . various reminders dt. 18-08-1981 , 01-09-1981 and 21-10-1981 the workman concerned did not submit his explanation.
It is stated that Shri R. N. Sharma, the workman concerned while working at B /o Shahbad Mohd. Pur was involved in the acts of misappropriation and manipulation of amounts in various accounts of the parties the details ofwhich have been mentioned hereinafter . It is stated that when no reply was received by us , a charge sheetdt . 26-07-1983 was issued to Shri Ram Niwas Sharma, the workman concerned , wherein full details of manipulation and misappropriation of amounts committed by Shri Ram Niwas Sharma, the workman concerned was given . He was also informed vide the said charge sheet the name of the Enquiry Officer and was also advised that he will be permitted to be defended by a representative of a registered trade union of bank employees of which he is the member . This charge sheet was received by him as is apparent from Annexure M - I . The charges levelled against the workman concerned, Shri Ram Niwas Sharma, are stated herein below:-
"During the course of performance of his duties , Shri Sharma has misappropriated funds to the tune of over Rs . 18,000/-from various parties maintaining their HSS A/cs at the branch by making various fictitious entries without accounting for the cash deposited by them through the proper channel of books maintained at the branch. The details of several such entries appearing in accounts are given below whereby it transpired that Shri Sharma made a number of credit and debit entries under his initials though there were no respective cash receipts and payments shown in the cash receipt/payment books , Cash ScrollBook and Detail Book :-
LEDGER NO . I
A/ c No. Loose
Name of A/ c holder
Amount Leaf No. (Rs . ) Dr./Cr.
Sr. Date of
No. receipt
6
4
5
3
1 2
Sardare
50/-( Cr . ) 1. 02-05-1981
195593 93
19569560/- (Cr .) 156
2.
14-05-1981
The management has filed written statement . In the written statement, it has been stated that the opposite party. Central Bank of India, hereinafter referred to as ' the Bank' most respectfully submits its written statement to the statement of claimdt . 19th April , 1994. Before giving parawise reply to the statement of claim the bank raised the following preliminary objections as to the maintainability of the present statement of claim and the Industrial Dispute. Itis stated that the workman concerned, Shri Ram Niwas Sharma was involved in various acts of gross misconduct while working as Asstt . Cashier at B/ o Shahbad Mohd Pur, New Delhi. He was allotted the duties of work of cash receipts and payments , HSS ledger postings and completion of pass books . While working in the said branch , Shri R. N. Sharma misappropriated funds to the tune of over Rs . 18,000 /- from various parties maintaining their HSS accounts at the said branch by making fictitious entries without accounting for the cash deposited by them through the proper channel of books maintained at the branch.
Principal GGHS School
3. 14-04-1981 Sardare
177 195671 2000/- (Cr . ) 4. 01-04-1981 Ramu
298 195854 2000/ - (Dr . ) LEDGER NO . II
5. 05-01-1981 Chandgi Ram 385 196010 100/- ( Cr . ) 6. 10-01-1981 RS Bharel 516 621369 500/ - (Cr . ) 7. 04-02-1981 Bhajan Lal 427 624918 160/ - (Cr . ) 02-03-1981 Bhajan Lal 427 624918 100/-( Cr . ) Bhajan Lal 427
02-05-1981
It is stated that when this fraud came into light of the bank immediately put Shri Ram Niwas Sharma, the workman concerned under suspension and thereafter issued a memodt . 03-08-1981 to Shri Sharma whereby his explanation was called upon to explain about his acts of manipulation/ misappropriation of amounts in the HSS accounts ofvarious parties while working as Asstt. Cashier
624918 100/ -(Cr . )
624923 100/ - (Cr . ) 8. 12-04-1981 Bimla Devi 486
23-04-1981 Bimla Devi 486 624923 100/- (Сг .) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2
4
3
5
6 1
9.
Prem Vati 515
01-05-1981
150/- (Cr . )
621115
10. 03-04-1981 MS lamba 633
50/-(Cr . )
621214
11. 12-02-1981 OP Bhutani 437
500/ -(Dr . )
624919
LEDGER No. III
854
12. 07-01-1981 Ram Nath
195817 400/ - (Cr . ) 13. 17-01-1981 Nand Kishore 857
1450/- ( Cr.)
624624
14. 07-01-1981 Usha Kaushik 813 621470 250/ - (Cr. ) 15. 22-01-1981 Chhaju Ram 873 634639 2100/ - (Dr . ) LEDGER No. IV
16. 11-05-1981 Sunita
196107 50/- (Cr . )
1420
17. 09-05-1981 Hanuman Mandir 1317 195986 230 / - ( Cr . ) Sri Chand 1222
18. 14-01-1981
621385 400/- (Cr. ) 19. 16-05-1981 Ashok Kumar1078 624865 120/- (Cr. ) 20. 14-01-1981 Phoolwati 1052 624895 250/- (Cr . ) 21. 06-05-1981 Sri Kishan 1364 196035 300/ - ( Cr . )
1361
22. 01-01-1981 Raj Mal
196031 40/ - ( Cr . )
1392
23. 31-03-1981 Hari Dutt
195996 50/- (Cr .) 24. 26-03-1981 Smt . Kishan 1364 196035 100/- ( Cr . )
1200/- (Cr . ) 25. 28-02-1981 Parmanand 1282 195804
02-04-1981 Parmanand 1282 195804 1000/ - (Cr . ) Smt . Misri 1136
26. 02-04-1981
624817 700/ - ( Dr. ) Sohan
1149
27. 15-05-1981
624977 400/- ( Dr. ) 28. March 81 Roop Kaur 1310
1300/ - (Dr . )
195979
Ithas also been observed that though debit entries as indicated above were made in the HSS accounts but no such cash withdrawals were made . Evidently Shri R. N. Sharma manipulated these debit entries in order to cover up the fictitious credit entries made by him in the various HSS accounts . Besides above, Shri R. N. Sharma has also manipulated the below noted accounts at B/ o Shahbad Mohd Pur by making fictitious credit entries as detailed below without depositing the said amount received by him from the respective depositors and has thus misappropriated the said amounts :-
Sr. Name of the A/c No. Holder
HSS A/ c No.
Date & Amount of credit entry
5 6 1 2 3
4
541
1000/- 1 . Sher Singh
May 1980
15-05-1980 2. Tek Chand
580
500/-
600/-
622
May 1980 3. Rattan Singh Gaur
30-06-1980 4. Sita Ram
842
500/-
998
300/-
20-06-1980 5. Savitri Bhoral
100/-
11-02-1980 6 . Millo Lal
1202
Jai Kishan
300/- 7.
1114
May 1980
17-10-1980 8 .
123
900/- Chandgi Ram
06-10-1980 1200/- 9. Munshi Ram
1009
20-11-1980 500/- 10. Rajinder Singh Bhoral 516
941
1000/-
26-11-1980 11. Pooran Singh
800/-
06-11-1980
1009
12. Munshi Ram
842
13. Sita Ram
11-11-1980 300/-
1050
800/-
05-12-1980 14. O. P. Yadav
935
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005 /माघ 2, 1926
It isalso observed that, he has made manipulations as detailed below in the HSS accounts at Shahbad Mohd Pur branch by making fictitious debits to cover up his manipulations in respect of misappropriation of credits, so as to manipulate tallying of ledger balances :-
Sr. Name of the A/ c
HSS A/c No.
No. Holder
Date & Amount of credit entry
100/-
376
1. Smt . Barfi
26-06-1980 .
678
2000/-
26-06-1980 2. Sat Pal Arora
800/-
28-06-1980 3. Ram Kanwar S/o Rella 1033
400/- 4.
1195
Smt. Sahib Kaur
May 1980
900/-
03-10-1980 Mam Chand
311
5.
04-10-1980 1200/- Sis Ram
1005
6 .
500/-
20-12-1980
520
7. Umed Singh Lamba
2100/-
17-11-1980 8 . Ram Phool Sharma 962
800/-
No date
1043
9. Smt . Badamo Devi
Besides what is stated above it is further observed that Shri Ram Niwas Sharma has tempered with the records of the bank and made several manipulations in the following accounts : --
A/c 801 Bhagwati (Loose Leaf Sheet No. 624570) On 10-04-1981 credit entry of Rs. 500/- was made by Shri R. N. Sharma in Ledger as well as in pass -book but no such entry is reflected in Cash Scroll and in Cash Receipt Book . This entry was subsequently cancelled in the ledger .
A/ c 956 Krishna Devi (Loose Leaf No. 624721 ) On 15-10-1980 one credit entry for Rs . 1500/- was made in the ledger by Shri R. N. Sharma and subsequently on 19-12-1980 the ledger entry was cancelled by him.
A/c 1282 Parmanand (Loose Leaf No. 195804)
On 02-04-1981 ledger shows credit of Rs . 1000/- which was not entered in Scroll' and in Cash Receipt Book . On 30-04-1981 an amount of Rs . 1050/ - was allowed to be withdrawn against the said credit. On the back of withdrawal slip the signature of Shri R. N. Sharma appears and which shows that he had taken the payment and later on 13-06-1981 a sum of Rs . 910/- was deposited by Shri R. N. Sharma under his signature in the deposit slip .
A/ c 1005 Sri Ram Vahti (Loose Leaf No. 524771 ) On going through this account it has been revealed that entries made in ledger and pass - book do not tally . On 04-10-1980 a debit of Rs . 1200/- was entered in the ledger and again on 03-04-1981 a sum of Rs. 1200 /- was credit in the party's account and balance was increased by that amount . Later on 07-04-1981 the balance was corrected by Shri R. N. Sharma .
A/c 1310 Rook Kaur (Loose Leaf No. 195979 )
Sometime in March , 1981 a sum of Rs . 1300/- was debited in the ledge account of the party and later in July 936
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
1981 the balance was changed and corrected by Shri R. N. Sharma in the ledger as well as in the balance book .
A/ c 177 Sardare (Loose Leaf No. 195671 )
On 14-04-1981 a credit entry of Rs . 2000/- was made in the ledger as well as in the pass - book of the party under the signature of Shri R. N. Sharma though no such entry was available in the Scroll and in Cash Receipt Book . Again withdrawal of Rs . 1000/-Rs . 300/ - and Rs . 100/- were allowed against the said deposit, although no such deposit as per bank's record was made but the said withdrawal of Rs . 1400/- were allowed (whereby the A/ c stood over drawn by Rs . 951.59) .
It has also been revealed that on 15-06-1981 the following amounts in cash were deposited in the parties' accounts without any signautre of the depositor in the vouchers : -
Amount
Account No.
1317
Rs . 230/-
1364
Rs. 300/-
1392
Rs . 50/-
1445
Rs . 200/-
The aforesaid acts of Shri R. N. Sharma are prejudicial to the interest of the Bank constituting gross misconduct within the meaning ofpara 19.5 ( i) and 19.5 (j ) ofthe Bipartite Settlement. "
It is stated that the bank has also filed an FIR in regard to various acts committed by the workman concerned . Shri Ram Niwas Sharma and the police after investigation filed a charge sheet in the Court. In view of this the bank had kept the disciplinary action against the workman concerned in abeyance . It is stated that after the charge sheet was filed by the police in the Criminal Trial Court, further proceedings were held and the latest position in this case as informed by the police to the bank is that the case was fixed for the evidence of the prosecution on 31st March , 1994. Further information regarding proceedings in the court have not been received from the police so far.
It is stated that further investigations revealed that the workman concerned , Shri R. N. Sharma was involved in further acts of gross inisconduct for which he was served with a memo dt . 25-06-1986 . A reminder was issued to this memo dt . 19-09-1986 . It is mentioned that even after a lapse of about three months the workman concerned did not submit explanation to the said memo . Hence the bank proceeded in the matter on the basis of available facts and issued him a charge sheetdt . 15-12-1986 in which following charges were levelled against him :--
"On 31-01-1981 , Shri R. N. Sharma while working at B/ o Shahbad Mohd Pur had received the following amounts for credit of under noted accounts
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] mentioned against each , from the respective depositors :-
1. Rs. 100/ - for credit of RDS A/ c 103 Shri Deep Chand Saini .
2. Rs. 100/- for credit of RDS A/ c 185 Shri Raj Kumar Saini .
In case of RDS A/ c 103 relating to Shri Deep Chand Saini , Shri Sharma got one pay - in - slip for Rs. 100/-scrolled and accounted for amount but in the case of RDS A/ c 185 pertaining to Shri Raj Kumar Saini , Shri Sharma neither got the pay - in - slip for Rs . 100/- scrolled nor accounted for .
However , Shri Sharma had made the credit entry of Rs . 100/ - each in the respective pass books of the above mentioned accounts duly initialed by him with a view to dupe the cited accounts holders and took monetary advantage thereof. The pay - in - slip of Rs . 100/- pertaining to RDS A/ c 103 was duly posted in Bank ledgers . But subsequently , Shri Sharma had intentionally changed the account No. 103 to 185 by tempering with bank's records so as to show as if the amount of Rs . 100/- was originally deposited in the account of RDS 185. His mischievous motive was self- vitiated as Shri Deep Chand Saini's name remained unaltered , bearing scroll no . 3 and recorded as " RDS 103 account Deep Chand' in Cash Receipt Book and thus he has pocketed a sum of Rs. 100/- paid in by Shri Raj Kumar Saini's RDS 185 for depositing in his RDS A/c .
"The aforesaid acts of Omission/ Commission on the part of Shri Ram Niwas Sharma constitute gross misconduct within the meaning of Clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement. "
It is stated that the workman concerned was advised vide the said charge sheet that he will be allowed to be represented by a representative of a registered trade union ofthe bank employees of which he is the member. The bank submits that as a matter of fact the workman concerned was represented by the President of the Central Bank Staff Union, Shri Tara Chandra Gupta during the course of the entire enquiry proceedings .
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder .
In his rejoinder , he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has stated that no show- cause notice was given to him . No opportunity of submitting application was given to him . His guilt was pre -judged . The fraud alleged related to January , 1981 whereas the charge sheet was given to him after five years .
Both the parties have adduced evidence .
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that principles of natural justice have not been followed and he has not been afforded opportunityto properly cross - examine the witnesses and to give sufficient evidence. I have perused the enquiry report. He has participated fully in the enquiry and he was given one employee of the bank to assist him. As such , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
the enquiry is quite fair . Principles of natural justice have been followed. It was further submitted by the workman applicant that there was inordinate delay in instituting the enquiry. The alleged fraud was committed in 1981 whereas charge sheet was issued to him on 15-12-1986 . As such , properdocuments were not available . From perusal ofthe enquiry, it transpires that two charge sheets have been issued to him . One charge sheet was issued on 26-7-1983 and the second charge sheet was issued on 15-12-1986. It has been alleged that he has misappropriated money from several HSS accounts . A detailed charge sheet has been given to him and every entry has been specifically mentioned . The accounts in which fraud has been committed has been mentioned in the body of the award . They need not be mentioned again . The witnesses in the enquiry proceedings as well as in the court have supported the fraud of the workman applicant . He was given show- cause notice and he gave explanations to the notice also but his explanation was not found satisfactory so charge sheet was issued to him . He has made embezzlement in several accounts . Those embezzlements were detected within 3-4 years so two charge sheets have been given to him. The enquiry officer has conducted the enquiry according to the principles of natural justice. He has deposited some of the money allegedly embezzled byhim.
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that extreme punishment has been given by the disciplinary authority as well as the appellate authority . The enquiry officer did not apply his mind while finding the charges 'proved. The Appellate and Disciplinary Authority have not also acted judiciously . I have perused the orders of the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority. The orders are supported by reasons . The enquiry officer has also reached the conclusion of sufficient evidence . As such, the enquiry is quite fair . It requires no interference . The management has cited several rulings to substantiate the fact that enquiry was proper and principles of natural justice has been followed and the punishment was also proper. There was heavy embezzlement so the punishment of dismissal was quite correct. The workman applicant was working on the post of trust and repose and he has caused valuable loss to the bank so the punishment of dismissal in the instant case is quite appropriate . 1 have perused 1991 LAB - I cases , 1339 and 1992 LAB Ist cases , 1585. The law cited by the management are perfectly applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case. The law cited by the workman applicant is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.No interference is required.
The reference is replied thus :-
The action of the management of Central Bank of India, New Delhi in dismissing Shri Ram Niwas Sharma, Assistant Cashier with effect from 14-01-1988 isjustified . The workman applicant is not liable to get any relief as prayed for.
The award is given accordingly . Costs easy.
DT. 20-12-2004
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer
937
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. .-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011/194/ 2003- आई . आर. ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th December , 2004 S.O. .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workman , received bythe Central Government on 29-12-2004.
[No. L- 12011 /194/2003 -IR(B- II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy. ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT Shri B. Biswas, PresidingOfficer 1
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 .
Reference No. 14 of 2004
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Zonal Manager , Bank of India and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman 1: None.
Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate. State : Jharkahand
Industry : Coal . Dated, Dhanbad, the 15th December , 2004 . AWARD
TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12011/ 194/2003 - IR (B- II) dated the 27th November, 2003 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, Patna in denying Shri Sunil Kumar Shrivastava , Cashier- in- charge , consolidated allowances of Rs . 295/ - forworking as Computer Terminal Operator is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled ? " 938
THE GAZET TE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
AWARD
1.The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012/ 149/ 2002 ( IR - B - II ) dated 11th December, 2002 for adjudication on the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
2. Ir 1 this case neither the concerned workman nor his repres entative found present . 'Management , however, made ap pearance through their learned Advocate . It transpires from the record that in spite of issuance of repeated notices the concerned workman or his representative did not consider necessary to appear to take st eps in connection with this case . This is a case of 2004. Considering the conduct off the sponsoring union/ work.man it shows clearly that they are not interested to proc eed with the hearing of this case . In the circumstances, there is no justification to adjourn the case for days together suo moto by this Tribunal . Hence , the case is closed and a' No dispute ' Award is passed in this reference presuming non- existence of any industrial dispute 'between the parties.
"Whether the action of the Management of Syndicate Bank , Zonal Office , Gandhinagar , Bangalore is justified in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service in respect of Shri R. Shanmukhappa , Ex -Clerk Syndicate Bank , Hutti Branch , Lingasugur Taluk, Raichur Distt. Karnataka State w.e.f. 31-8-1999 ? If not , what relief theworkman is entitled to ? "
B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 दिसम्बर, 20044
का.आ. 295.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में ' निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 66/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/149/2002- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव
2. On the receipt of the reference from the Government, it was registered and notices were taken against the respective parties. First party made appearance through counsel , Shri Dhirendra N. Katti on 25-2-2003 and the Second Party management also came on record through counsel , Shri Ramesh Upadhyaya . From 25-2-2003 till 28-7-2004 i.e. from a period of about 5 months , the case under went several adjournments affording opportunity to the first party to submit his Claim Statement and since the first party failed to do so , the matter came to be posted for filing of the Counter Statement , if any , by the Second PartyManagement and the management also has chosen not to file any Counter Statement and therefore, this award.
New Delhi , the 29th December, 2004
S.O. .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 66/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman, received by the Central Government on 29-12-2004 .
[No. L - 12012/ 149/2002 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT "SHRAM SADAN" ,
III MAIN, III CROSS , II PHASE , TUMKUR ROAD , YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE - 560022
Dated: 13th December , 2004
PRESENT
Shri A. FL. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer
C. R. No. 66/02
II PARTY
I PARTY
3.As noted above , despite the several opportunities given to the first party and despite the fact that he made his appearance before this tribunal through counsel , no attempt was made on his part to file the Claim Statement . From the order sheet maintained by this tribunal it can be further seen that from 15-4-2004 onwards , neither the first party nor his counsel took pains to be present before this tribunal let alone filing the Claim Statement . Therefore , from the above conduct of the first party it is crystal clear that he is no more interested in the proceedings . Of course, as per the point of reference , noted above , the primary burden was cast upon the management to justify the punishment of dismissal of the first party w.e.f. 31-8-1999 . However, since the first party himself is not coming forth by filing the Claim Statement , much less , making out a case as to how he is justified in challenging the dismissal order passed against him and as to how the management was wrong in passing the impugned punishment order, the management is not supposed to , rather , need not be called upon to justify its action against the first party . Therefore, in the light of the conduct of the first party , it is to be presumed that he is not interested in the prosecution of the case and in the result there is no point in keeping the proceedings any more pending . Hence the following Award.
The Asstt . General Manager
Shri R. Shanmukhappa,
AWARD
Telegadi Mani,
Syndicate Bank,
ZonalOffice,
Mudgal,
Raichur- 584125
P. B. No. 9947,
The reference is rejected for non prosecution . No orderto cost .(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 13th December , 2004) .
Karnataka State
Gandhi Nagar Bangalore- 560009
A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 296.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ऑल इंडिया रेडियो के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं ० 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 163/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -42012 /128/97- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 30th December , 2004 S.O. 296. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 163/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of All India Radio and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 30-12-2004 .
[No. L -42012/ 128 /97 - IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER : R.N.RAI I.D. No. 163/98 IN THE MATTER OF :-
Sh . E.S. Sanil Kumar, C/o The General Secretary , Delhi Labour Union , Aggarwal Bhawan , G.T. Road. Tis Hazari , Delhi- 110054.
Versus
The Director. All India Radio . AIR . Akashwani Bhawan , Parliament Street . New Delhi- 110001
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L-42012/ 128/ 97 - IR (DU) Central Government Dtd. 03-7-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication .
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the denial of promotion of Sh. E.S. Sanil Kumar to the post of Steno Grade - Il w.e.f. 1-7-93 and denial of difference of salary on the principle of equal pay for equal work from 1-7-93 onward by the management of All India Radio , Akashwani Bhawan ,
939
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22 , 2005/माघ 2, 1926
New Delhi is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled" .
The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim , it has been stated that the workman Sh . E.S. Sanil Kumarjoined . into the employment of the All India Radio w.e.f. 9-7-91 as aL.DC in proper pay scale and allowances (inthepay scale of Rs. 950-1500). He has unblemished and uninterrupted record of service to his credit.
That the workman aforesaid has been assigned the job of Steno Grade - II w.e.f. 1-7-93 against a vacant post, lying vacant since 1990 , which carries the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2600 with usual allowances admissible under the rules . The workman has made various representations for his promotion/ regularisation on the post of Steno Grade-II but no fruitful result has been yielded.
That the work man has been working to the entire satisfaction of his superiors who have recommended his case again and again but no fruitful result has been yielded and for that reason it has been decided to raise an industrial dispute under the industrial dispute Act, 1947 .
That the action of the management is violative of the directions of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in case ofMCD V/ s Lalit Mohan according to which regularisation of services shall be made on post to post and point to point basis . That the job of the Steno Grade - II against which the workman aforesaid has been working since 1-7-93 is a permanent and regular nature ofjob .
Thatthe workınan aforesaid has been working as a Steno Grade- II independently and satisfactorily and the same has been verified and testified by the supervisory officers/ supervisory staff under whom he has been working . That the action of the management is violative of the principle of" equal pay for equal work " as enshrined in article 39 ( d) of the Constitution of India .
Thatthe action of the management amounts to unfair labour practice as provided in Section 2( ra ) read with item No. 10 of the Vth schedule of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 as the workman has been deprived of proper salary and status by paying him lesser remuneration than those to which he was entitled i.e. the pay scale of Rs . 1400- 2600 , now revised to Rs . 5500-9000 w.e.f. 1-1-96 .
That a demand notice was served upon the Director General of All India Radio by registered A/D post vide communication dated 18th February , 1997 with a copy thereof to the Director General ( news ) , news service division , All India Radio , New Delhi , duly received in their offices but no reply was received and it was presumed that the demand has been rejected . Thereafter the dispute was raised by filing a statement of claim before the conciliation officer ( Central ) , New Delhi . The conciliation proceedings were initiated by the conciliation officer (Central) but resulted in failure because of the adamant and non - cooperative attitude of the management. Hence this reference .
940
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
categorically stated that it is correct that the work of Steno Grade- II is being managed by Clerk Grade - II LDC . As such, it is admitted that the workman applicant has been discharging the duties of Steno Grade - II from 1-7-1993. It was submitted from the side of the management that there are no rules for the change of LDC to the post of Steno and there is no rule to promote an LDC to the post of Steno Grade - II . It was submitted that the Court has no jurisdiction as the management is not an industry . The management is an industry in view of the Bangalore Water Supply so there is no force in this argument .
It istherefore prayed that an award be made in favour of the workman holding thereby that the denial of promotion of Sh . E.S. Sanil Kumar to the post of Steno Grade - II w.e.f. 1-7-93 and denial of difference of salary on the principle of " Equal pay for equal work " from 1-7-93 onward by the management of All India Radio , Akashwani Bhawan , New Delhi through Supdtg . Engineer , HPT , Khampur, Delhi -36 is illegal and unjustified and he be held entitled to be promoted to the post of Steno Grade - II w.e.f. 1-7-93 in proper pay scale and allowances and with all arrears thereof on the principle of " equal pay for equal work" from 1-7-93 onward . The cost of litigation as provided in Section 11 (7) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 may also be awarded to the workman .
My attention was drawn to 1987 SCC ( Lab ) 32 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that persons in continuous officiation for about 7 years are entitled to pay and allowances equal to Regular and permanent employees.
The management/respondent has filed WS . In the WS it has been submitted that the claim petition as framed and filed is not maintainable . That the present reference is bad in law, without application of mind and in a stereotype manner hence liable to be dismissed . That the above claimant has no locus standi to file this claim against the respondent inanagement being there no industrial dispute between the parties .
That the claim is not maintainable as there arises no cause of action against the management and in the favour ofthe claimant . It is absolutely wrong and specifically denied that workman has been assigned thejob of Steno Grade - II w.e.f. 1-7-93 against a vacant post . It is pertinent to mention here that he was only attached to vigilance section . After careful consideration the request of claimant was turned down on the reason that the post of LDC and Steno Grade- II are distinct and separate with separate recruitment rules . There is no direct recruitment to the post of Steno Grade- 11 . Appointment to Steno Grade - II is made only 100% on promotion from the post of Steno Grade - III .
Ithasbeenheld in 1986 I LLJ 134 ( SC) that equal pay should be given for equal work . The management has not been able to explain as to who discharged the duties of Steno Grade- II . The workman applicant is discharging the duties of Steno Grade - II and according to the judgement of 1987 , SCC ( Lab ) 32 , 7 years officiation entitles an employee to become a permanent employee on that post and to get all the benefits of a permanent employee . Admittedly, the workman applicant is discharging the duties of Steno- Grade - II from 1-7-1993 . As such , he is doing the work of Steno Grade -II for almost 12 years . As such, he is entitled to all the benefits that accrue to Steno Grade- II. In view of the Bangalore Water Supply, AIR is an industry . There is a systematic activity . They charge fee for advertisements and it partakes of the nature of trade . As such , the management is an industry in view of the judgement of the Bangalore Water Supply of the Hon'ble Supreme Court .
So the question for regularisation as Steno Grade -II does not arise . It is pertinent to mention here that the claimant has been paid as per rules and regulations provided under the law. Hence the question of giving any further monetary benefit does not arise .
The law cited by the workman applicant are fully applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case . The law cited by the management are not applicable as the rules cannot override the findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble High Court . Even if the rules do not permit in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court , the workman applicant has become a permanent Steno Grade - II and he is entitled to all the benefits of a permanent Steno Grade - II .
It is submitted that the claimant has been paid as per rules and regulations , he was only attached to vigilance section as LDC and paid for the same . It is therefore prayed that the claim petition of the workman may kindly be dismiss with heavy cost in view of facts stated above .
The reference is replied thus:
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder and he has reiterated the averments of his statement of claim . The management has denied almost all the paras of the statement of claim . Evidence of both the parties has been taken.
The denial of promotion of Sh . E.S. Sanil Kumar to the post of Steno Grade - II w.e.f. 1-7-1993 and denial of difference of salary on the principle of " equal pay for equal work" from 1-7-1993 onward by the management of All India Radio , Akashwani Bhawan, New Delhi is neither legal nor justified. The workman applicant deserves to get all the emoluments and the benefits of Steno Grade - II w.e.f. 1-7-1993 till the date of payment . The management is dicted to pay the difference of wages by way of arrears from 01-07-1993 till the date of payment. In case , the management fails to pay him the arrears of the wages of Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record . It is admitted that the workman applicant was appointed at the post of LDC from 9-7-1991 . It is also admitted that the work of Steno was taken from him since 1-7-1993 . MW/1 has stated in his cross- examination dtd . 12-1-2001 that he was given the job of Steno from 1-7-1993 . The management witness has 941 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
The point runs as hereunder :-
StenoGrade- II as directed within two months , the workman applicant will be entitled to get an interest of 12% per annum over the entire arrears that become due . No order as to costs .
Theaward is given accordingly.
Dt. 15-12-2004
"Whether the action of the superintending Engineer , Coordination Circle (Elect) , CPWD, New Delhi , by not counting the date of seniority of Sh . Khushi Ram and by not promoting to the post of operator is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to . "
R. N. RAI, PresidingOfficer
नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 297.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.० II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 70/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42011/44/95- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 30th December, 2004
The claimant has filed statement of claim . In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the petitioner Sh . Khushi Ram was appointed in the department on 14-6-1960 as a cleaner in Air Condition No. II . That the petitioner was promoted as Asstt. Operator on 6-4-64 vide department promotion committee in the grade of 85-2-95-3-110 . In order to change the designation from operational sideto the serviceman who are to be promoted upto to foreman category. In order to coop this deficiency the department again promoted the petitioner on 24-6-69 again as Asstt . Operator. This promotion sould have been made as serviceman and not as Asstt . Operator . However , the petitioner remained in the post . He constantly prayed to the deptt. that he may be given the designation of operator or mechanic in the deptt. Even in the designation ofAsstt . Operator, he continued discharging the duty of mechanic .
S.O. 297. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 30-12-2004.
[No. L -42011 /44/ 95 - IR(DU) ]
KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
That the petitioner has passed the trade test of the operator on 9-5-73 but he was not promoted in the case . Also the deptt. had issued letter on 11-1-80 that the concerned workman has passed the test of the operator but was not promoted in that very designation . It is quite unjustified and improper for not promoting the petitioner to the higher designation . The unjustified action of the department is evident from the fact the employee having quite lesser length of service or equal length of service were promoted even to the post of the Foreman , Mechanic etc. some of their names are given as under :-
1. Sh. Gurcharan Dass was promoted as Workmen ;
Sh. Jai Singh was promoted as Sr. Mechanic ; 2.
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI
3. Sh . Bhushan Singh as Sr. Mechanic , and I.D. NO . 70/96
Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI
4. Sh. Mahinder Pratap was promoted as Sr.
Mechanic .
IN THE MATTER OF :-
Sh . Khushi Ram,
There are also other few employees of equally situated in tenure of service . There are other persons also who have been promoted to higher designation ignoring the right of the petitioner .
Asstt. Operator as represented by Bhartiya Shramjivi Sangh (Regd. ) , 240, Lawyers Chamber, Western Wing, Tis Hazari , Delhi .
VERSUS
S.E. Co -Ordination Circle (Electrical) , CPWD, IP Bhawan , New Delhi-
That the petitioner had made so many representations to the respondent including dated 15-11-91 , 19-12-91 and 12-2-92 , wherein it was clearly mentioned that great injustice has been done to the petitioner but the respondent management has paid no need to the request ofthe workman .
AWARD
Thatthe petitioner was at the verge of retirement and now he has been retired even and how it is said that the employee who had served the department for about 30 years has not got the due promotion at all , although he The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L -42011/44/ 95 IR-(DU) Central Government Dt . 27-6-1996 has referred the following point for adjudication .
109 GI/2005-36 942
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
had passed the tests in this matter , yet the department had not issued a letter for the promotion to the concerned workman who had passed the test and promoted as operator vide letter No. 10 ( 59-80 ) DCEC - I / 169-81 dated 11-1-80. According to this letter the deptt . had issued list ofemployees . The petitioner's name appears on S. No. 43 , the name appearing in this letter even juniors were promoted to a designation of operator but the petitioner as ignored with some enmity of the officer or with some malafide intentions of some of the officers .
That the claim of the claimant that he should be promoted as full operator and presently being paid to the petitioner till his retirement be taken into consideration and the full arrears of the amount less paid to him be paid to the claimant considering his case as entitled to the post offull operator in view of letter dated 11-1-1980 .
The management/ respondent has filed W.S. In the W.S. it has been submitted that Sh . Khushi Ram was appointed as cleaner is the department on 15-7-60 (not on 14-6-60 as claned by the worker ) . He was recategorised as Khalasi on 5-7-62 due to merger of the post of cleaner with Khalasi . He was promoted as Asstt . Operator ( E&M) on 9-4-64 . The worker was reverted to the original post of Khalasi on 25-11-67 . At this stage it is not possible to find out reasons of reversion. However worker has never objected to this reversion .
He was promoted as Asstt . Operator, E& M ( AC & Refg. ) on 24-6-69 . The worker claims to have passed trade test for serviceman ( E& M) in 1966-1967 . No record ofthe trade test are available at this belated stage . However from available records , it is noticed that the worker on his own accepted the post of Asstt. operator on 24-6-69 as this promotion came earlier and he had already waited for 2.5 years for the post of serviceman.
The worker made a request for change of category from Asstt. Operator to serviceman in 1972 and application was rejected by his Executive Engineer (Elect) vide his letter No. 15 ( 22 )/72 -Dated . II/ 8166 dated 19-6-72 .
The worker passed trade test for the post of operator in 1980 and was promoted on 15-4-94 with notional seniority from 5-1-94 . It would be seen from the promotion order that Asstt. Operators in general category of seniority of 11-12-61 have been promoted during 1994. As such Sh . Khushi Ram has been promoted in turn with other Asstt. operators . Comparisonwith other categories is notjustified as promotion to those categories was restricted to feeder grade as provided intheir (recruitment rules ) R/RS to which Sh . Khushi Ram did not belong . Sh . Khushi Ram's application is an after thought thathad he waited for his turn for promotion to serviceman, hewould have had better carreer advansement . It is submitted that the post of Khalasi is the lowest level post in the department from which workers have choice ofpromotion to a number of specialized categories depending upon their fulfilling the requirenment of recruitment rules for the post . Once a worker has been promoted to a particular feeder his
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] seniority is to be decided with reference to other members of the feeder. He is neither provided option to change his category at a later stage not is allowed to compare his seniority with members of other feeders .
Sh . Khushi Ram has since superannuated from Govt . service on 31-5-94 . His case can not be considered at this stage. In view of above , it is prayed that the ID No. 70/ 1966 may be dismissed.
The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder, he has denied most of paras of written statement and has reitereated the averments of his statement of claim .
Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that he was appointed on 14-6-1960 and he was retired in 1994. He passed trade test in 1980. He has not beenpromoted with the others . Even juniors to him have been promoted . It was submitted from the side of the management that he was promoted as Asstt . Operator but hewas reverted on 09-04-1994 . The papers ofhis reversion are not available due to long gap of time. From the post of Khalasi , he was promoted as Asstt . Operator on 24-6-1969 . It is not known on what grounds he was reverted and again how he was promoted . The worker on his own accepted the post of Asstt . Operator on 24-6-1969 . No record oftrade test are available at this belated stage . The workman applicat was promoted alongwith others . He made a rep *change of his category to serviceman in 1972 and his application was rejected by his Executive Engineer vide his letter No. 15 (22 )/72 - DED - II/816 dt . 19-6- 1972. It was further submitted by the management that the category cannot be changed and he was promoted as Asstt. Operator on 24-6-1969 . His seniority will be tinued from that date of promotion . He has already waited for 25 years for the post of serviceman . He was promoted on 05-01-1994 according to his seniority . No juniors to him have been promoted . He wanted to be promoted atthe post pf serviceman but he was a Khalasi and he cannot be promoted to serviceman . He was promoted to Asstt. Operator. The workman applicant was promoted in 1969 as Asstt. Operator if his seniority was undermined then he ought to have make representations and in case his representations were rejected, he should have filed ID case withintime . His representation was rejected in 1972 but he satsilent and after two years of his retirement, he has moved this case after a gap of 25 years . The Limitation Act is not applicable inthe ID Act cases but delay and latches deprive aman ofhis requisite rights . The papers regarding his service are not available so the management is not a position to say anything as to how he was reverted . The workman applicant hasnot filed the papers .
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that after retirement , the workman applicant cherished second thought and he filed his case . In case, his letter for promotion to serviceman was rejected , he should have 943
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/भाघ 2, 1926
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
IN THE MATTER OF :-
Sh. Surat Singh
Through the General Secretary, Delhi Chhawni Karamchari Union Delhi Cantt. , Board Office, Sadar Bazar, Delhi Cantt. , New Delhi .
VERSUS
The Secretaryy , Delhi Cantonment Board, Delhi Cantt. , New Delhi.
AWARD
filed the case. The Limitation Act . is not strictly applicable but the case of the workman applicant deserves to be rejected on the ground of a long gap . He has not proved that juniors to him have been promoted. He did not want tojoin the post ofOperator. He wanted to be promoted as serviceman and due promotion was given to him according to the management in January , 1994. As such, I find no force in the case of workman applicant . My attention was drawn to 1980( 1) SLP Page , 390 , I have perused the law. This judgement is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case due to long delay and latches on the side of the workman applicant.
The reference is replied thus :-
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 13011 /3 / 98 IR-(DU) Central Government Dt . 13-11-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication.
The point runs as hereunder :-
The action of the superintending Engineer , Coordination Circle (Elect ) , CPWD , New Delhi , by not counting the date of seniority of Sh. Khushi Ram and by not promoting to the post of operator is justified . The workman applicant does not deserve to get any relief as prayed for.
The award is given accordingly.
Dt. 21-12-2004
R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer
नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2004
"Whether the action of the management of Delhi Cantonment Board in rejecting the candidature of Sh. Surat Singh for the post of pump operator is justified after taking into account the provision for relaxation of qualification and experience prescribed for the post in the notification dated 2-7-87 ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to do" .
का.आ. 298.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दिल्ली कैन्टोन्मेन्ट् बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.० II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2004 को प्राप्तः हुआ था ।
The claimant has filed staternent of claim . In the statement of claim, it has been stated that the workman Sh. Surat Singh S/o Sh. Bhundu Ram, R/o H. No. B - 6 , East SagarPur, Gali No. 11 Palam Road, New Delhi - 110046 is a member of the Delhi Chawani Board Karamchari Union. He has an uninterrupted and unblemished record of services to his credit with the management i.e. Delhi Cantonment Board ..
That the workman , belonging to the scheduled caste [सं. एल-13011/3/98- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 31st December, 2004
wasappointed as labourer in the Delhi Cantonment board on 20-3-68 . He was however promoted as a pump operator vide order No. 248 , dated 22-9-72 issued by them Cantonment Executive Officer Mr. D.R. Paul . However the workman was continued to be paid the pay scale of a sweeper . The management however designated the workman as a valveman in 1984 vide order No. 144 dated 7-5-84.
S.O. 298. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Delhi Cantt. Board and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2004.
[No. L -13011/3/98 - IR(DU) ]
KULDIP RAI VERMA, DeskOfficer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI
Presiding Officer, R.N.R.A.L,
LD . NO. 5/99
Thatthe management has been taking the work of a pump operator from the workman right from 1972 and continues to do so till date . That the said workman has continued working as a pump operator performing the duties and discharging the responsibility of a pump operator independently and to the satisfaction of the management . It is submitted that there is no difference in the work performed by the concerned workman , the responsibilities discharged by the concerned workman and those performed by the regular pump operators . It is further submitted that the workman concerned has been and is subject to the identical service conditions including the identical disciplinary regime as is applicable on the regularly appointed pump operators . The management however with the aim and intention of denying the 944
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22 , 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] concerned workman of his rightful wages and has been treating the workman as a sweeper/valveman on paper and thereby paying him the wages of a sweeper/valveman ; while his counterparts who are also doing identical work in alll respects were paid their salary in the normal pay scale of a pump operator with usual allowances admissible under the rules applicable to the management.
On 16-10-97, before the conciliation officer , Sh. Khushal Singh , Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) the management represented that they would appoint the workman as a pump operator. However, they did not even consider the workman for the said post . The aforesaid statement was made by the management only to mislead the said workman the conciliation officer . The proceedings were closed . It was much later when the management did not take any action and showed no intention of fulfilling its promise the said workman had to have the conciliation proceedings revised.
The same has been done with the sole aim of denying the concerned workman of the regular pay and allowances of a pump operator for the work being performed by the workman . It is submitted that the same amounts to commission ofunfair labour practices as enumerated under the fifth schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .
The respondent management has employed the said workman as a pump operator but instead of regularising his services or appointing him de jure also as a pump operator has chosen to keep him as a sweeper /valveman . this act of the management amounts to unfair labour practices and is also violative of articles 14,21 and 39 of the constitution of India. It has to be remembered that the management is " state " within the definition of article 12 of the constitution of India and therefore unlike any other employer has greater responsibility towards its employees . The said act on part of the management respondent is also not in consonance with various Supreme Court Judgements , wherein the Government has been time and again called upon to be a "model employer " and not to indulge in any unfair labour practice and the exploitation of the labour .
That the workman has been regularly representing against the injustice being meted out to him by way of regular representations . The workman concerned has consistently represented that he has been working as a pump operator since 1972 and regularly since 1984 and therefore, his services should either be regularised as pump operator or he should be appointed as pump operator in the regular pay scale with usual allowances . However , he has not received any reply from the management with respect to the same. It is submitted that the management has even promoted/appointed employees junior to the workman as pump operators . In the year 1988 , the management appointed Sh . Jain Bhagwan , a fireman, as pump operator . It is submitted that the said person had never even rendered any service as pump operator . The management has therefore been adopting an appointment policy which is not only blatantly unfair, illegal , arbitrary but is based on the principal of "pick and choose " .
That the above action of the management is wholly illegal , bad, unjust and malafide and amounts to exploitation of the labour and unfair labour practice . That a representation/demand notice was given by the said workman on 7-6-96 to the chief executive officer, Delhi Cantonment Board, Delhi which was duly received by his office on the same day . However no reply was received and it is therefore presumed that the said demand had beenrejected.
That thereafter a dispute was raised by filing a statement of claim in the office of the Regional Labour Commissioner ( c) on 19-11-96 . The conciliation proceedings were initiated but resulted in failure because of the adamant and non co - operative attitude of the management . Hence this reference .
That the management has continued to take the work of a pump operator from the concerned workman while paying him wages and allowances of a sweeper / valveman , which are substantially less than that of a pump operator. It is submitted that the said workman is qualified for the post of a pump operator as he fulfils the qualifications as laid down in the Gazette Notification dated July 2, 1987 , which is applicable on the management . Even other wise it was the right of the said workman to be considered for the post of pump operator . The concerned workman therefore under law should have been regularly appointed as pump operator by the management and paid the regular wages along with the usual allowances .
That the action of the management in making the concernedworkman work as a pump operator while paying him the wages of a sweeper/valveman , is unjust and arbitrary . The management has not bothered or cared to respond to the representations of the concerned workman or the union .
The management/ respondent has filed WS . In the WS it has been submitted that the workman was appointed as temporary mazdoor in March 1968. Later under the office letter no . 12 /VI/ ad - hoc dated 30-10-73 his services were terminated . Thereafter again on his request on 18th November 1973 vide letter no . 12/VI /ad - hoc, the workman wasappointed as Sweeper . Later on his appointment as sweeper was confirmed . In may , 1984 the workman was designated as valveman . Till date the workman is continuing as a valveman .
The obstinate and adamant attitude of the management forced the union to take necessary action by raising an industrial dispute on 19-11-96 . The management however continued to play their games and adopt an anti labour attitude during the conciliation proceedings also .
That the requisite qualifications for the post ofpump operator are prescribed under Gazette notification No. 9 / 17/82 published in part III of the Delhi Gazette , Delhi [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Administration. The qualifications applicable to the board for the post of pump operator are (i) Metric pass and ( ii) certificate in electrical or equivalent from ITI or any other recognized institution . However the workman does not posses the requisite qualifications for the said post . Moreover as per the CFS rules the post of pump operator is not a promotional post. It is submitted that the said post is direct recruitment post and only qualified candidates may be recruited against the post.
It is submitted that the terms of reference are misconceived . It submitted that there is no order as to relaxation of requisite experience/ qualification in case of recruitment of pump operators . The only relaxations available is with regard to the age which is applicable in case of departmental candidates alone . However a candidate not fulfilling the requisite educational qualifications is not entitled to any consideration for the post of the pump operator.
It is denied that the workman was appointed as a pump operator vide order No.248 dated 22-9-72 issued by the then cantonment executive officer Mr. D.R. Paul . It is submitted that in the year 1972 , due to manpower contingencies and constraints vide the said letter the workman was appointed as pump operator on temporary and ad - hoc basis . It is submitted that this ad -hoc appointment did not confer any right to any permanent post. Moreover the services of the workman were terminated vide management office letter dated 30-10-73 . Later on be was appointed as sweeper in November, 73. It is also not denied that the management designated the workman as valveman in 1984 vide its order No. 144 dated 7-5-84 . However , it is submitted that since both the posts i.e. that of sweeper and valveman are of class IV and having the same pay scale , the workman was not entitled to any increase in the pay .
It is denied that the management has been taking thework of a pump operator from the workman since 1972 and continues to do so till date . It is submitted that the workman was appointed as a pump operator on temporary basis and thereafter in the year 1973 his temporary services were terminated . It is denied that the workman has performed the duties of a workman independently .
It is submitted that since he did not possess the requisite qualification or the trade certificate as per the norms laid down by the Delhi Administration ( now Government of NCT of Delhi ) in the notification number F. 9/ 17/82-LSG dated 31-12-82 and the Gazette Notification of Delhi Administration . Delhi of July , 1987. It is denied that any person without having the requisite qualification for the post of pump operator was ever appointed a pump operator by the management. It is also denied that the management ever adopted an appointment policy which was unfair , illegal or arbitrary . Besides the fact that the post of a pump operator is a non -promotional one , the workman does not possess the requisite qualfications for 109 G1/2005-37
945
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
the said post . The question therefore of regularising his services cannot arise.
It is denied that the management has continued to take the work of a pump operator from the concerned workman while paying him wages and allowances of a sweeper /valveman. It is submitted that in the year , 1968 the workman was appointed as a temporary mazdoor . His services were terminated under this office letter No. 12/VI/ Ad-hoc dated 30-10-73 . Later on , on his request in November , 1973 he was appointed as a sweeper under F - 9 (A.F. Area) on purely temporary basis with the condition that in case the sanction for competent authority is not received the services can be terminated and he will not be entitled to the posts as a matter Right. Later on his appointment to the post of sweeper was confirmed .
It is submitted that the workman is an illiterate person and does not possess the qualifications as mentioned in the preceding paragraphs . It is further denied that even otherwise it was the right of the workman tobe considered for the post of Pump Operator. As submitted above the management can appoint only such candidates for the post of pump operator who possess the requisite qualification or the trade certificte as per the norms laid down by the Delhi Administration in their notification as givenabove .
It is stated that the respondent management appointed the said workman as a pump operator in the year 1972 on temporary basis and thereafter is services were discontinued, under law the workman does not have any right or claim to the post of pump operator . Moreover , the workman is not possessing the requisite qualifications stated above.
The management has denied most of the paras of the statement of claim . The claimant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder , he has stated that he has sufficient duty of a Pump Operator though he was not initially appointed as Pump Operator but the duty of Pump Operator have been taken from him for a long period , as such he should get the salary of the Pump Operator and he should be continued at the post of Pump Operator. It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that by office order dt . 17-08-1990 , he was appointed reliever at OldNangal Village. As such, he started the work of Pump Operator from 17-08-1990 . According to office order dt . 17-09-1992 , he was given the duty of Pump Operator . By order dt . 11-12-1992, again he was given the duty of Pump Operator . By order dt. 25-3-1993 , he was given the duty of Pump Operator and by orderdt. April , 1993 , he was given the duty of Pump Operator and on 14th August , 1993 he was appointed reliever . He was given the duty of Pump Operator w.e.f.6-5-1996 and he worked at the post of Pump Operator for more than 7 years . The papers submitted by the workman applicant have been denied by the management . No doubt , these papers are photocopies but 946
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
ofequal pay for equal work in 1987 - SCC -LAB - 32 . It has theybear the signature of the person who distributed the dutyto theworkman applicant for doing the work ofPump Operator. It isbut natural that the original papers would beinthe possession ofthe management . The management has been asked to produce those papers but the managementhas not produced the papers. It was submitted from the side ofthe management that initially theworkman applicant was not appointed pump operator but according tothe workman applicant , he has worked on the post of PumpOperator right from 20-07-1987 to 07-06-1996, Itwas further submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant did not possess the requisite qualification and he was not interviewed for the post of PumpOperator.There is no rule for promotion to thepost ofPumpOperator. The workruats applicant did not possess the requisite qualifications.
beenheldby the Hon'ble High Court in 1995 - LLR -438 that in case, an employee is performing the duties for a considerable period, he should be deemed to be permanent onthat post and he is entitled to get the emoluments of that permanent post. It was further submitted by the worknsanthat in case the management did not rely on the photocopies ofduties assigned to the workman as Pump Operator, the management should have filed original papers.The original papers are lying with the management but the management has not filed any other paper so it is established that the workman applicant is discharging the duties ofPump Operator from 17-08-1990 . It implies that hehas got previous experience and knowledge of the operation of the pump so he was given the duty of the Pump Operator. Accordingto the Gazettedt. 2nd July, 1987after 5 years experience , he is entitled to be appointed as permanent Pump Operator. There is no force in the argument ofthe management that he lacked qualification accordingto the Gazette of 1982. That Gazette has been replaced by the Gazette of 2nd ofJuly, 1987 so the later Gazette is applicable and there is no minimum qualification forpump operator and the post is promotional . As such, the management has failed on both the counts-on requisite qualification and experience. The requisite qualification has been relaxed in 1987 in order to provide promotionto the employees of the management.
In view of the above discussions and the law cited bythe workman applicant , it becomes quite obvious that heshouldbedeemed to be promoted from 1st January. 1995 in view ofhis five years experience as laid down in theGazette dt. 2nd of July, 1987 and he should get all the emoluments and consquential benefits of a permanent PumpOperator from 1st January, 1995.
The reference is replied thus:-
The action of the management of the Delhi Cantonment Board in rejecting the candidature of Sh. Surar Singh for the post of pump operator is not justified aftertaking into account the provision for relaxation of qualification and experience prescribed for the post in the notification dt. 2-7-87 The workman applicant shall bedeemedtobe promoted from 1st of January , 1995 and he is entitled to get all the consequential benefits just as arrears ofwages and increment etc. within one month from the date of the publication of the award. The workman applicant shall get an interest of 12% per annom in case arrears are not paid within one month from publication of the award.
It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that qualification was relaxed by Delhi Gazette registered No. D'187 on 2nd of July , 1987. Accordingto that Gazette, Lary 5 years experience is required for the post of pump operator. It has also been mentioned that thepostwillbe filled upby promotion 100 %. In case, it is notpossible, it shall be filled directly for the pump operator . Ithas been specifically mentioned that the post istobe filled up by promotion and only qualification required is 5years, practical knowledge of operation IC Engine and electric motors , It was further submitted from the side of the workman that the workman applicant has filed photocopies according to which he was posted as Pump Operator from 17-08-1990 and he has worked almost upto 6-5-1996. So he has worked for more than 5 years asPump Operator in the same department as such , it is presumed thathe has absolute knowledge ofthe operation of the IC Engine and electric motor prior to 1990 and he was given theduty ofPump Operator from 17-08-1990 , As such , he has more than 5 years experience of operation of the pump ofthe management itself. The management has assigned him duty after ascertaining his qualification and practical knowledge of the operation of the electric motor andIC engine so it shall be deemed to be admitted by the management that the workman applicant has complete knowledge of the operation of IC Engine and electric motor. He has worked from 17-08-1990 to 1996-97 so he has more than 5 years experience and according to the Gazettedt. 2nd of July , 1987, he deserves to be promoted automatically to the post ofPump Operator in view of his previous postingas Pump Operator in the management itself. It is paradoxical that the management is taking duty of Pump Operator and arguing that has not minimun qualification
The award is given secordingly.
Did. 23-12-04
RN RAL. Presiding Oficer My attention was druvn to 1986-1 - LLJ - SC Page, 134, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a person performing the identical work should get identical pay. TheHon'ble Supreme Court has pronounced the principles [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005 /माघ 2 , 1926
नई दिल्ली , 31 दिसम्बर, 2004
का०आ० 299.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दिल्ली कैन्टोन्मेन्ट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 169/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-13011/4/98- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st December, 2004 S.O. 299. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 169/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Delhi Cantt . Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2004 .
[No. L - 13011/4/98 - IR(DU)] KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, RAJENDRA BHAWAN , GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 169/98
In the matter of:
Sh. Upkar Singh , Through The General Secretary , Delhi Chhawni Karamchari Union , Delhi Cantt. Board Office , SadarBazar , Delhi Cantt . , New Delhi - 110010 .
VERSUS The Secretary, Delhi Cantt . Board . Delhi Cantt. , New Delhi - 110010.
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 13011/4/ 98 / IR (DU ) Central Government Dtd . 30-07-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication .
The point runs as hereunder:-
"Whether rejection of the candidature of Sh . Upkar Singh , for the post of pump operator on 25-04-1991
947 was justified viz - a -viz the relaxation of qualifications and experience prescribed for the post vide notification dtd. 02-07-1987 which was not taken into account of by the management at the time of interview? "
Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to . " The union has filed statement of claim on behalf of the workman. In the statement of claim it has been stated thattheworkman Sh . Upkar Singh S/ o Sardar Mahendar Singh, R/ o 3/17, Pyaralal Building , Gopi Nath Bazar , Delhi Cantonment is a disabled person and is a member of the Delhi Chhawani Board Karamchari Union. He has an uninterrupted and unblemished record of services to his creditwith the management i . e. Delhi Cantonment Board.
That the said workman had been sponsored by the ITI - Vocational Rehabilitation Centre , ITI Building, Pusa , Delhi . a center operating as an employment exchange for the disabled . The said center conducted a proper test for pump operators , testing both the practical and the theoretical knowledge of the workman . It was after the said test that the workman was certified as a pump operator and a card issued to him by the centre . The said workman was otherwise also qualified to work as a pump operator as he had worked from 1980 to 1986 as a pump operator, with a licensed contractor for the Delhi Cantonment Board/ MES, and had thereby acquired rich experience ofthejob. Thatthe management thereafter called the workman for an interview/test for the post of a Pump Operator on October 5, 1989 and thereafter finding the workman fit and qualified for the post of Pump Operator , appointed him as such vide Order No. 256 dtd. December 4, 1989 on daily wages . The said workman was appointed as a Pump Operator along with two other workmen, S/Shri S.K. Mishra and Raj Narain Sharma .
Thatthe said workınan thereafter continued working asapump operator, performing the duties and discharging the responsibility of a pump operator independently . However throughout the management paid the said workman only daily wages thereby denying to him the pay scale of the regular pump operator . The said workman continued to perform his duties diligently and to the satisfaction of his superiors . That the services of the other two workmen. S/ Shri S.K. Mishra and Raj Narain Sharma , appointed with the said workman , were regularised as pump operators by the management on July 4, 1991 . However on December 24, 1991 the services of the said workman were , suddenly regularised on the post of a Malaria Mazdoor, in the Sanitary Department, a job the workman had never performed and a Department the workman had never worked in . The said workman was however asked to continue discharging the duty of a pump operator, till as recently as February 21, 1997. It is submitted that there is a substantial difference in the pay scale of a Malaria Mazdoor and a Pi Operator and the foref 948
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2 , 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] themanagement to regularise the said workman as a malaria mazdoor was done intentionally to rob the workman of his rightful dues.
It is denied that Shri Upkar Singh is adequately qualified to become a Pump-Operator . The required qualifications as enumerated in the official gazette does not entitle him to the said post . The prescribed qualification as per Gazette notification No. F - 9 / 17/ 82 - LSG dtd . 31-12-1982 are as under :
Essential :
(i) Matric pass from a recognised University/Board/ School or equivalent .
(ii) Certificate in Electrical or equivalent trade from I.T.I. or any other recognised Institution.
Thaton February 22, 1997 the said workman, without any reason or cause was told to work as a Malaria Mazdoor and not as a Pump Operator. The Respondent Management has employed the said workman as a pump operator but has been paying him the wages of a Malaria Mazdoor . This act of the management amounts to unfair labour practice and is also violative of Articles 14 , 21 and 39 of the Constitution of India. It has to be remembered that the Management is " State " within the definition of Article 12 of the Constitution of India . That the above action of the management is wholly illegal, bad, unjust and malafide and amounts to exploitation of the labour and unfair labour practice.
Shri Upkar Singh has been truant in working and has always been avoiding to work sincerely as Malaria Mazdoor. The respondent Board has been considerate and liberal with him and has not taken any disciplinary action against his callous attitude towards his rightful duties. The representation made by Shri Upkar Singh was rightly turned down by the respondent board as there was no reason for his promotion. Any such order favouring his promotion would have been patently illegal , unjust and arbitrary qua other suitable and qualified candidates for the post of Pump-Operator.
The management has filed written statement. In the written statement , it has been stated that the present complaint is not maintainable for it being filed with malice . Shri Upkar Singh who had been employed as Malaria Mazdoor by the respondent board is absent from his duties, ever since the orders were issued for reporting ofMalaria Mazdoor to Sanitary Supdt . Cantonment Board Office , on 18-10-1996 Shri Upkar Singh has not reported to the concerned official. He had sought the leave which was duly sanctioned till 30-11-1996 . Thereafter there has been no application for extension of leave or any just reason forhis abstention from work . It is manifest that Shri Upkar Singh who is a truant employee has chosen to move the Hon'ble Court to subvert the operation of the above dated orders . The orders had been proclaimed by the respondent board in order to brace themselves upto fight the epidemic ofDangue .
It isdenied that there has been any arbitrariness, un- lawfulness on the part of respondent Board in denying the post of Pump-Operator to Shri Upkar Singh . On the contrary, any such order favouring his promotion or employment as Pump-Operator would have evoked wrath ofArticle 14 of the Constitution of India qua the other suitably qualified candidates. It is to be submitted that the mere fact that there are regular vacancies of Pump- Operator in the respondent Board does not entitle Shri Upkar Singh to it in the absence of requisite qualification as provided in the official gazette .
The management has denied most of the paras of the statement of claim .
Shri Upkar Singh had never been employed as Pump Operator. He has been working as daily wages mazdoor in the respondent board . Subsequently, on 27-12-1991 he had been duly regularised as Malaria Mazdoor . His regularisation as Malaria Mazdoor entailed due benefits . Which naturally flow out of the said employment . There has never been official orders either of his promotion to the post of pump- operator of his appointment as Pump Operator. In order to avoid working diligently Shri Upkar Singh abstained from reporting to the concerned Sanitary Supdt. and has filed his bogus claim. It is not possible to promote or employ Shri Upkar Singh as Pump- operator as he does not have requisite qualification . Malaria Mazdoor being Class - 1V post and pump-operator being Class - III post there cannot be any inter- class promotion in this case. Also Shri Upkar Singh is only 10th Standard pass and is wanting in qualification required to hold the post ofPump Operator . As per classification of post the post of Pump Operator is a direct recruitment post and not a promotionpost.
The claimant has filed rejoinder. In his rejoinder , he has denied most of the paras of the written statement and has stated that he was appointed on the post of Pump Operator and subsequently he was reverted to the post ofMalaria Mazdoor . By letter dtd . 29-09-1989 , he was required to appear for interview on 05-10-1989 of the Pump Operator and on 4th of December , 1989 on the basis of interview and test , he alongwith Shri S.K. Mishra and Raj Narain Sharma was appointed Pump Operator from 11-12-1989 . On 17th of March , 1990, he was again appointed as Pump Operator w.e.f. 10-03-1990 . By order dtd. 9th of July , 1990 he was again appointed as Pump Operator w.e.f. 09-06-1990 . On 17-08-1990 , the workman applicant was appointed Pump Operator w.e.f. 18-08-1990 . By office order dtd . 17-09-1992 , the workman applicant wasappointed Pump Operator w.e.f. 21-09-1992 . By order dtd. 11-10-1992 , the workman was further appointed Pump Operator w.e.f. 15-12-1992. On 23-12-1993 , the workman [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
applicant was appointed Pump Operator. Accordingto roaster on 5th of April , 1994 , he was given the duty w.e.f. 16-4-1994 . By orderdt . 5th of April, 1995, the workman applicant was again given the duty of Pump Operator . By duty roaster dt . 16-10-1995 , he was again given the duty ofpump operator. By office order dt . 6-8-1996 , he was again given the duty of the Pump Operator. As such , the workman applicant worked as pump operator from 11-12-1989 to the last of 1997.
It was submitted from the side of the workman applicant that he has worked for more than 7 years as Pump Operator and he has been given duty as permanent employee so he cannot be reverted to the post of Malaria Mazdoor as he was appointed todo the duty of the Pump Operator and he discharged the duties of Pump Operator for more than 7 years .
It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant did not possess the requisite qualification so he was reverted to the post of Malaria Mazdoor . Despite his reversion to the Malaria Mazdoor , he was given the duty of Pump Operator for almost 4 years. In case, he was lacking qualification, he ought not to have been given the duty of Pump Operator. It was submitted from the side of the management that the qualification of the Pump Operator has been prescribed and only the candidate having requisite qualification can be appointed at the post of Pump Operator . In this connection , my attention was drawn to Delhi Gazette dt . 2nd July . 1987 , and it has been mentioned that the operator should have five years experience and he should have the knowledge of I. C. engines and electric motors and he will have to appear in interview regarding his knowledge of diesel engine and petrol engine , pump and other machinery , and experience of conducting and taking care of the engine and the other machines . It was submitted from the workman applicant that his interview was taken and thereafter he was appointed . It was further submitted from the side of the management that the workman applicant did not possess the requisite qualification of Pump Operator. He must be Matric Pass and he must have certificate of electrical or ofthe I.I.T. or is equivalent .
Itwas submitted from the side of the management. that the workman applicant was appointed at the post of Pump Operator on 11-12-1989 and he has worked in that capacity upto 1997. Appointment letter is annexed with the record and the orders regarding the duty has also been annexed with the record . These papers are photocopies . It is but natural that the originals are lying with the management but the management has not deliberately filed the original papers regarding the duty and appointment . It was submitted from the side of the management that by Gazettedt . 1982 for the post ofPump Operator, the minimum qualification is Matric Pass + a certificate of elecctrical or of ITI or its equivalent . The
949
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2 , 1926
workman applicant is lacking qualification so he was reverted to Malaria Mazdoor in 1994 but from the papers filed by the workman applicant , it is quite explicit that he has worked continuously from 11-12-1989 to the last of 1997 at the post of Pump Operator . He has filed several papers regarding the duties assigned to him . The management has not filed the originals of the same papers deliberately by way of concealment. In case , there were papers regarding assignment of duty to the post of Malaria Mazdoor, they should have filed the original duty chart but no such charge has been filed . As such, it is established that the workman applicant has worked almost from 1990 to the last of 1997 as Pump Operator . So far as qualification is concerned , it has been relaxed by notificationdt. 2nd of July , 1987. This Gazette indicates that the minimum qualifications have been relaxed and thepost ofthePump Operator has been made promotional. Five years experience is required and knowledge of operating IC Engine and electric motor is required. The workman operated the pump of the management right from 1990 to the last of 1997. As such, he has more than 5 years experience and he was initially appointed at the post of Pump Operator and he has continued to discharge the duties ofthe Pump Operator . Even if, he has not minimum qualification, he has operated the pump of the management foralmost 6 to 7 years . The management found him fit and experience to operate the pump so he was assigned the duty of the Pump Operator . It is paradoxical that the management is taking duty of Pump Operator and arguing that he lacks minimum qualifications.
My attention was drawn to 1986 - I- LLJ - SC Page , 134 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a person performing the identical work should get identical pay . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has pronounced the principles of equal pay for equal work in 1987 - SCC - LAB- 32. It has been held by the Hon'ble High Court in 1995- LLR-438 that in case, an employee is performing the duties for a considerable period, he should be deemed to be permanent on that post and he is entitled to get the emoluments of that permanent post .
There is no force inthe argument of the management thatthe workman applicant does not possess the minimum qualification for the post of the Pump Operator in view of the Gazette dt . 2nd of July, 1987 and there is no force in the argument of the management that he has been ever reverted to the post of Malaria Mazdoor . The management has filed no papers in order to prove the stand taken by the management . The workman applicant has complete knowledge and experience of the operation of IC Engine and electric motor as he has been discharging the duties ofa Pump Operator since 1990 upto the last of 1997. After 5years experience in view of the Gazettedt. 2nd July, 1987 he shall be deemed automatically to be promoted to the post of Pump Operator . Since he is operating the pump of the management itself, as such , no experience is required.
950
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 22, 2005/MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR, U.P.
Industrial Dispute No. 163 of 98
Inthe matter of dispute between:
In view of the law cited by the management , it becomes quite obvious that the workman applicant shall be deemed to be promoted at the post of Pump Operator from 1-1-1994 after completion of 5 years duty at the post of Pump Operator with all the consequential benefits . In view of the judgement cited above , he is entitled to get arrears of wages and due increments and he shall be deemed to be permanent from 1-1-1994 at the post of Pump Operator . The management has indulged in unfair labour practices in not considering the case of the workman applicant .
The reference is replied thus :-
Sri Nathu Lal Sharma, Secretary HAL, Karamchari Sangh , 23/4, HAL Colony , Kanpur.
AND
General Manager , H.A.L. Kanpur Division, Kanpur.
AWARD
1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour. New Delhi , vide its notification no . L- 14011 / 7/ 98 /IR ( DU ) dated 17-8-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
Rejection of the candidature of Sh . Upkar Singh , for the post of pump operator on 25-04-1991 was not justified viz - a -viz the relaxation of qualifications and experience prescribed for the post vide notificationdt .02- 07-1987 which was not taken into account by the management at the time of interview . The workman applicant shall be deemed to be promoted at the post of Pump Operator from 1-1-1994 and he is entitled to get all the consequential benefits just as increments and arrears of wages etc. w.e.f. 1st January , 1994. In case the management fails to pay the arrears of wages within one month from the date of the application of the award , the workman applicant shall get an interest of 12 % per annum.
The award is given accordingly.
Dt.: 24-12-2004
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
Whether the action of the General Manager , HAL , Kanpur, in not promoting S /Shri S.K. Vasudeva , S. Prasad , R.N. Savita , Vaseer Ahmad, S.G. Sharma, S.S. Gaur , B.C. Banerjee and Sri S. Charan to wage group E is legal & justified ? If not to what relief the workmen are entitlted ?
नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 300.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एच.ए.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 163/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[ सं. एल-14011/7/98- आई. आर. ( डी.यू) ]
कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 31st December , 2004
2. In the present case after exchange of pleadings between the parties , the case was fixed for filing documents by the parties and evidence of the parties. Both parties filed respective documents in support of their respective cases . On 29-7-04 , the case was taken up for hearing when the evidence of the workmen was to be recorded in the case. Since no one was present in the case on the date of hearing on behalf of the workmen nor workmen adduced any evidence hence , workmen were debarred from evidence and the case was fixed for evidence of the management . Ultimately when the case was taken for hearing on 11-8-04 , during the course of pretrial meeting ofLOK ADALAT, the representative for the management appeared and made an endorsement on the order sheet to the effect that as the workers have not given any evidence in the case we do not give also .
S.O. 300.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 163/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court . Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of H. A.L. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2004.
3. Thus from the above it is clear that virtually it is a case without evidence of the parties and under these circumstances the tribunal is left with no other option but to hold that the Union is not entitled for any relief whatsoever for want of evidence and the reference is liable to be answered against the Union .
[No. L - 14011/7/98 -IR(DU) ]
KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer
4. Inview of discussions made above , the reference is answered in affirmative holding that the Union raising [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
951
भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 22, 2005/माघ 2, 1926
the present dispute is not entitled for any relief for want of evidenc.
5. Accordingly the reference is answered against the Union and in favour of the management.
SURESH CHANDRA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर, 2004
का.आ. 301.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ.एन.जी.सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 195/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2004 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -40012/ 56/98- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]
कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st December, 2004 S.O. 301. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 195/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt . of Telecom . and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on31-12-2004 .
[No. L -40012/56/ 98 -IR(DU) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SURESH CHANDRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, SARVODAYA NAGAR, KANPUR, U.P.
Industrial Dispute No. 195 of 98
In the matter of dispute between:
Sri Om Prakash .
S/o of Sh . Gajodhar Prasad, R/ o Village Habidapur, PostToderpur, District Hardoi , U.P.
AND
The General Manager , Telecom Department , Gandhi Bhawan , Lucknow.
AWARD
1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi , vide notification No. L -40012/ 56/ 98/IR(DU) dated 30-11--98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department Lucknow in terminating the Services of Sri Om Prakash is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?
2. The instant case was identified for decision through LOK ADALAT, despite the fact that the workman was debarred from adducing evidence after exchange of pleadings between the parties as he failed to make his appearance before the tribunal on the date fixed in the case i.e. 30-6-04 . The same day the representative for the management appeared and made an endorsement on the ordersheet to the effect that as the workman has not adduced any evidence in the case , management do not want to adduce any evidence in support their case. However, notices were issued to the parties for hearing the case in the pretrial meeting of LOK ADALAT for 11-8-04.
3. The case was taken up for hearing in the pretrial meeting but despite notice none appeared from the side of the workman to attend the hearing of the case on 11-8-04, whereas the management was duly represented through its representative .
4. Therefore, from the facts and circumstances stated above it appears that virtually the present case is a case of no evidence and as the workman has palpably failed to adduce his evidence in support of his case , the claim of the workman is liable to be rejected for want of evidence and the workman is also not entitled for any relief pursuance to the present reference order made to this tribunal .
5. Accordingly it is held that the workman involved in the present industrial dispute is not entitled for any relief for want of evidence and his claim is liable to be rejected and is hereby rejected.
6. Let two photocopies of this award be sent to the Government for its publication .
SURESH CHANDRA , Presiding officer नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2005
का.आ. 302.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि बैंक नोट मुद्रणालय , देवास ( म. प्र. ) में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 22 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है , उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए । 952
THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 22, 2005 /MAGHA 2, 1926
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है ;
अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।
अतः अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 16-1-2005 से छः मास की कालावधिके लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।
[सं. एस-11017/4/97- आई. आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव
New Delhi , the 10th January, 2005
[सं. एस-11017/6/97- आई. आर. ( पी.एल. ) ] जे. पी. पति, संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2005
S.O. 302.- Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest required that the services in the Bank Note Press, Dewas (M.P. ) which is covered by item 22 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act .
!
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - clause (vi) of clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act for a period of six months.
[No. S - 11017/4/ 97 - IR(PL)] J. P. PATI, Jt . Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2005
S.O. 303. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest required so that in pursuance of the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of the clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 1653 dated 24-6-2004 the service in Industry engaged in manufacture of production of mineral oil ( crude oil ) motor and aviation spirit , diesel oil , kerosene oil , fuel oil , diverse hydrocarbon oil and their blends including synthetic fuels , Lubricating oil and the like which is covered by item 26 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a public utility service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 16th July , 2004.
Andwhereas , the Central Government is of opinion thatpublic interest requires the extention of the said period by a further period of six months .
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi) of clause ( n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act , for a period ofsix months from the 16th January , 2005 .
का.आ. 303.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप - खण्ड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1653 दिनांक 24-6-2004 द्वारा खनिज तेल ( कच्चा तेल ) , मोटर और विमानन स्पिरिट, डीजल तेल , मिट्टी का तेल, ईंधन तेल, विविधा हाइड्रोकार्बन तेल और उनके मिश्रण जिनमें सिंथेटिक तेल और इसी प्रकार के तेल शामिल हैं के निर्माण या उत्पादन में लगे उद्योग में सेवाओं में है जोकि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 26 में शामिल हैं, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 16-7-2004 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया थाः
[No. S- 11017/6/97 - IR(PL ) ] J. P. PATI , Jt . Secy .
Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.