(
रजिस्ट्रीसं०डी एल ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05
REGD. No. DL (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत की राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 20] No. 20 ]
नई दिल्ली, मई 8-मई 14, 2005 , शनिवार /वैशाख 18-वैशाख 24, 1927 NEW DELHI, MAY8 MAY 14, 2005, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 18-VAISAKHA 24, 1927 इस भाग में भिन्नपृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3 Sub- section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
MINISTRY OF FINANCE वित्त मंत्रालय
(Departmentof Revenue)
(राजस्वविभाग )
ORDER
आदेश
New Delhi , the 5th May, 2005 नईदिल्ली, 5 मई, 2005
STAMPS
स्टाम्प
S.O. 1761.-In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899), the Central Government hereby permits UCO Bank, Kolkata to pay consolidated stamp duty of rupees one crore five lakh only chargeable on account of the stamp duty on Unsecured Redeemable Subordinated Privately Placed Bonds in the nature of Promissory Notes aggregating to rupees two hundred fifty crore only,to be issued by the said Bank.
का.आ. 1761. भारतीय स्टाम्प अधिनियम , 1899 (1899 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( i ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा यूको बैंक, कलकत्ता को मात्र एक करोड़ पांच लाख रुपए का समेकित स्टाम्प शुल्कअदा करने की अनुमति देती है जो उक्त बैंक द्वारा जारी किएजाने वाले मात्र दो सौ पचास करोड़ रुपए के समग्र मूल्य के प्रामिसरी नोटों के स्वरूप वाले असुरक्षित विमोच्य गौण निजी रूप से रखे गए बांडों पर स्टाम्प शुल्क के कारण प्रभार्य है ।
[F.No. 14/2005 -STAMP F.No. 33 / 16/2005 -ST] [सं. 14/2005 - स्टाम्प फा. सं. 33/ 16/2005 - एस टी]
R. G. CHHABRA, Under Secy.
आर. जी. छाबड़ा, अवर सचिव
1358 GI/05
(4753) 4754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14,2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
(सेन्ट्रल इकोनोमिक इन्टेलीजेन्स ब्यूरो )
आदेश
नईदिल्ली, 12 मई , 2005
का.आ. 1762.-अतः संयुक्त सचिव, भारत सरकार जिन्हें विदेशी मुद्रा संरक्षण और तस्करी निवारण अधिनियम, 1974 (1974का 52 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत विशेष रूप से शक्ति प्रदान की गई है, ने उक्त उप - धारा के अधीन आदेश फाइल सं. 673/04/2005- सी.यू.एस. VIII, दिनांक 5-4-2005 को जारी किया और यह निर्देश दिया कि श्री अदीश्वर जैन उर्फ अदिश जैन , सुपुत्र श्री प्रमोद प्रकाश जैन, निवासी - बी.एक्स.एक्स.एक्स. - 3127, गुरुदेव नगर, लुधियाना, पंजाब को निरूद्ध कर लिया जाए और केन्द्रीय कारागार, लुधियाना, पंजाब में अभिरक्षा में रखा जाए ताकि उन्हें भविष्य में चीजों की तस्करी करने से रोका जा सके ।
2. अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार के पास यह विश्वास करने का कारण है कि पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति फरार हो गया है या स्वयं को छिपा रखा है जिससे यह आदेश निष्पादित नहीं किया जा सकता ।
3. अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्ति का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति को यह निर्देश देती है कि वह शासकीय राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशित होने के 7 दिन के भीतर वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक, लुधियाना, पंजाव के सम्मुख उपस्थित हो ।
[फा. सं. 673/04/2005- सी.यू.एस.- VIII ] एन.एम. कृष्णन, उपसचिव ( कोफेपोसा) (Central Economic Intelligence Bureau)
ORDER
New Delhi , the 12th May, 2005
S.O. 1762. Whereas the Joint Secretary to the Government of India , specially empowered under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act , 1974 (52 of 1974 ) issued Order F.No. 673 /04/2005-Cus . VIII dated 5-4-2005 under the said sub- section directing that Shri Adishwar Jain @ Adish Jain, S/o Shri Prainod Prakash Jain, R /o BXXX - 3127 , Gurdev Nagar, Ludhiana , Punjab be detained and kept in custody in the Central Jail , Ludhiana , Punjab with a view to preventing him from smuggling goods in future .
2. Whereas the Central Government has reasons to believe that the aforesaid person has absconded or is concealing himself so that the order cannot be executed .
3. Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs the aforesaid person to appear before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana, Punjab within 7 days of the publication ofthis order in the Official Gazette .
[F. No. 673/04/2005-Cus . VIII] N.M. KRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. (COFEPOSA)
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 12 मई, 2005
:
का.आ. 1763.- अतः संयुक्त सचिव, भारत सरकार जिन्हें विदेशी मुद्रा संरक्षण और तस्करी निवारण अधिनियम, 1974 (1974का 52) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत विशेष रूप से शक्ति प्रदान की गई है , ने उक्त उप - धारा के अधीन आदेश फाइल सं. 673/06/2005- सी.यू.एस. VIII, दिनांक 31-3-2005 को जारी किया और यह निर्देश दिया कि श्री राजिन्दर अरोड़ा, सुपुत्र श्री सन्तोख चाँद अरोड़ा, निवासी 25 एफ, व्हाईट एवेन्यु, अमृतसर, पंजाब को निरूद्ध कर लिया जाए और केन्द्रीय कारागार , अमृतसर, पंजाब में अभिरक्षा में रखा जाए ताकि उन्हें भविष्य में चीजों की तस्करी करने से रोकाजा सके ।
2. अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार के पास यह विश्वास करने का कारण हैकि पूर्वोक्त व्यक्तिफरार हो गया है या स्वयं को छिपा रखा है जिससे यह आदेश निष्पादित नहीं किया जा सकता ।
3. अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्ति का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति को यह निर्देश देती है कि वह शासकीय राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशित होने के 7 दिन के भीतर वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक, अमृतसर, पंजाब के सम्मुख उपस्थित हो ।
[फा. सं. 673/06/2005/सी.यू.एस.- VIII ] एन.एम. कृष्णन, उपसचिव ( कोफेपोसा)
ORDER
New Delhi , the 12th May , 2005
S.O. 1763. Whereas the Joint Secretary to the Government of India , specially empowered under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act , 1974 (52 of 1974) issued Order F. No. 673 /06/2005 -Cus . VIII dated 31-3-2005 under the said Sub- section directing that Shri Rajinder Arora , S /o Shri Santokh Chand Arora, R/ o 25 F, White Avenue , Amritsar, Punjab be detained and kept in custody in the Central Jail, Amritsar, Punjab with a view to preventing him from smuggling goods in future.
2. Whereas the Central Government has reasons to believe that the aforesaid person has absconded or is concealing himself so that the order cannot be executed.
3. Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (b ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs the aforesaid person to appear before the Scnior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar, Punjab within 7 days of the publication ofthis order in the Official Gazette .
[F. No. 673/06/2005 -Cus. VIIIJ N.M. KRISHNAN , Dy. Secy. ( COFEPOSA) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4755
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क आयुक्त का कार्यालय हैदराबाद, 24 मार्च , 2005
सं. 1/2005- सीमा शुल्क ( गै. है. )
का.आ. 1764.-सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन, वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्त्र विभाग , नई दिल्ली के दिनांक 1-7-94की अधिसूचना सं. 33/ 34- सीमा शुल्क ( गै.टै. ) के अनुसार प्रत्यायोजित शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, मैं एतद्वारा खम्मम जिला, खम्मम नगरीय मंडल, रघुनाथ पालेम गाँव को सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन 100 प्रतिशत निर्यातोन्मुख इकाईयों को स्थापित करने के सीमित प्रयोजनार्थ भण्डार गृह स्टेशन घोषित करता हूँ।
[प.सं. IV/16/47/2005- तकनीकी]
एम.वी.बी. राव, आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE
अधीन मुझमें प्रदत्त शक्तिओं का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं, जयेन्द्रनाथ, सीमा शुष्कआयुक्त, तिरुच्चिर ल्लि इसके द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र सा.का.मि. 211 ( ई ), दिनांक 01-04-2005 में अधिसूचित सर्वे नंबर को समाविष्ट करने वाले तथा इस अधिसूचना के संलग्नक में उल्लिखित , महिंद्रा नगर, तालुक चेंगलपट्टु, जिला कांचीपुरम , तमिलनाडु राज्य में सूचना प्रोद्योगिकी, हार्डवेअर तथा बायो - इन्फरमेटिक्स के वि आ सं. को, आयातित माल के उतारण तथा निर्यात माल के लदान के सीमित प्रयोजनार्थ, सीमा शुल्क क्षेत्र घोषित करता हूँ ।
[सी.सं. VIII/48/ 13/2005-सी छु नीति ]
जयेन्द्रनाथ, आयुक्त अनुबन्ध
टेक्नो पॉर्क. वि आ अं संसाधन क्षेत्र जिला: कांचीपुरम
तालुक: चेंगलपट्ट
गांव कानाम
Hyderabad, the 24th March, 2005 No. 1/2005 -CUS. (NT)
अंजूर
सर्वेसं. एकडों में विस्तार
0.080
260/3E
0.070
326
03.00
327
328
0.110
0.260
16
तेनमेलपाक्कम
S.O. 1764. In exercise of the powers gated to me under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 vide Notification No. 33 /94-Cus . (NT) , dated 1-7-1994 of the Ministry of Finance , Department ofRevenue , New Delhi , Ihereby declare-Raghunathapalem Village ofKhammam Urban Mandal , Khammam District as a Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , for the limited purpose of setting up of 100 % Expeated Units (EOU) only.
[C. NICH
M.V. Amissioner सीमा शुल्कआयुक्त का कालय
तिरुच्चि, 29 अप्रैल, 2005 सं..2/ 2005 ( गै.है. )
(सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम की धारा ४( ख ) के अधीन जारी ) विषय: तमिलनाडु राज्य के जिला कांचीपुरम , तालुक चेंगलपट्टु, महिंद्रा नगर में सूचना प्राद्योगिकी, हार्डवेअर तथा बायो- इन्फरमेटिक्स के लिए वि सं को आयातित माल के उतारण तथा निर्यातित माल के लदान के प्रयोजनार्थ सीमा शुल्क क्षेत्र की सीमाओं की घोषणा ।
संदर्भ: ( i ) सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम की धारा 76 ' क ' के अधीन विआ अंचल को अधिसूचित करने वाली राजस्व विभाग की अधिसूचना सं 27/2005-सी शु ( गै ) , दिनांक 1-4-2005. ( ii ) राजस्व विभाग परिपत्र सं. 68/2003- सी शु, दिनांक 30-7-2003 का पैरा 15.
का.आ. 1765.-सौमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 52 ) की धारा ४ ( ख ) , भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली के परिपत्र सं. 68/2003- सी शु के साथ पठित , के
0.430
17/2
0.320
17/1A
0.420
17/1B
0.170
18
0.110
19
20
0.650
21/1
1.060
0.580
21/2
0.300
22/ 1A
0,300
0.540
22/ 1B
22/ 1C
0.260
0.210
26/1
0,780
26/2
0.060
26/3
0.750
28/1
0.610
28/2
31/1
(0.260
0.860
31/2A1
31 /2A2 1.445
0.310
32/1
0.140
32/2
0.050
32/3
33/2
0.380
0.320
33/1A
0,420
34/1
0.430
34/2
0.410
34/3
0.410
34/4 4756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
1
3
2
35/1
0.460
तेनमेलपाक्कम( जारी )
52/1
0.330
तेनमेलपाक्कम( जारी )
0.036
52/2
35/2
0.460
52/3
0.020 36/1
0,280
52/4
0.530 36/3
0,960
52/5
0.010
0.400
36/2A
0.010
53/1
36/2B
0,410
53/2
0.010 37/1
0.250
1.056
53/3
37/2
0.890
0.050
54/1
37/4
0.440
54/3
0,120 37/3C
0.410
54/5
0.250 37/3D
0.020
0,800
54/2A 38/2
0.150
54/2B
0.350
0.560
38/1A
54/4A
0,200 38/1B
1.070
0.560
54/4B1 39/2
0.400
54/4B2 0.070 39/ 1A1 0.330
55/1
0.220 39/ 1A2A 0.360
55/2
0.120 39/1A2B 0.070
56/3
0.400 39/1B
0,680
56/4
0,070 40/1
0,570
56/1A 0.370
0.560
40/2
56/1B1 0.460 41
0,400
0.590
56/ 1B2
2.630
42/1
56/2A
0.100 42/2
0.540
0.100
56/2B
42/3
0.400
56/2C
0.140 43
0.650
57/1
0.360 44
0,640
57/2
0.110
0.400
45/1
58
0.270 45/2
0.610
59
1.040 45/3
0.780
60/1
0.610 46/1
0.490
0.880
60/2
46/2
0.490
0.400
61/1
0.620
46/3
61/2
0,400 47/1
0.620
61/3
0.930 47/2
0.330
62
0.190 47/3
0.280
63
1.090 48/1
0.140
64/ 1A 0.210 48/2
0.950
65
1.070 48/3
0.190
66
1.230 48/4
0.250
67
0.280 48/5
0.300
1
70
1.130 49/1
0.650
76/1
0.200 49/2
1.330
77/2B
0.300
(0.560
49/3
77/3B
0.750 50/2
0.650
78
0.230 50/1A 0,400
79/3
0.360
0.020
50/1B1
79/4
0.250 50/1B2 0.370
79/1A 0.120
0,310
51/1
79/1B
0.140 51/2
0.360
0.270
79/2A1
0.280
51/3
0,070
79/ 2A2 51/4
0.400
79/2B. 0.690
0.040
51/5
80
0.350
0.060
51/6 4757 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
2
3 81
1.250
105/11A1 0.060 प्रेममेलपाक्कम(जारी )
तेममेलपाक्कम(जारी )
82
0.410
105/11A2 0.060
0.220
83/1A
105/11B 0.070 83/1B 0.010
105/12A 0.040 83/2B
0.020
0.040
105/12B 84/2
0,650
105/9A 0.010 84/1A 0.220
105/9B 0.020
0.400
84/1B
106/1
0.060
:
0.360
0.010 84/1C1
106/2
84/1C2 0,040
0.060
106/3
0.100
84/1C3
107/1
0.540 84/1D 0,330
0.200
107/2
85
0.210
107/3. 0.020 86
0.210
0,400
108
0.350
87/1
1.140
109
87/2
0.250
0.360
110/1
0.040 87/3A 0.280
110/3
87/3B
0.090
110/4
0.110"
88
0.280
0.070
110/7
90/1
0,050
110/2A 0.060
0.400
110/2B 0.060 90/2
0.250
90/4
0.090
110/5A 90/5
0.120
0.100
110/5B
110/6A 90/3A1 0,100
0.070
0,100
110/6B 0,070 90/3A2
90/3B
0.190
110/8A 0.140 90/6A 0.020
110/8B 0,040
0.050 90/6B 0.110
110/9A 91/2
0.140
110/9B1 0,060
0.120
0.170
110/9B2 91/ 1A
0.060
91/ 1B
111
3.380
0.240
112
0.330 91/3A
0.260
113
0.220 91/3B
102/1
0,070
0.330
114
0.050
0.200
115/1
102/2
0.100
0.230 103/1
115/2
0,300
115/3
103/2 0.140
0.410 103/3
0,050
115/5
0.560 103/4
115/6
0.040
0.220 103/5
115/4A1
0.090
103/6
0.070
0.040
115/4A2
0,190 103/7
0.070
115/4B
0.410 103/8
116
0.110
0,230
117
0.750
104
0.210
0.100
118/1
105/1
118/3
0.210
0.120
105/2
0.060
0.220
118/4
105/3
118/5
0.070
0.070
105/4
0.120
118/6
105/5
0.090
105/6
118/7
0,140
0.040
0.170
0.020
105/7
118/2A
0.200
0.020
118/2B 105/8
0.320
0,020
118/2C 105/10
0.270
119
105/13 1.160 4758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
1
2
3 120
0.120
तेनमेलपाक्कम( जारी )
0.260
140/1C
तेनमेलपाक्कम( जारी )
121/1
0.610
140/1D 0,140 121/2
0.270
140/2A 0.770
0.120
121/3A
140/2B 0.430
0.110
121/3B
141/1
0.900 122/1
0.420
141/3
0,070 122/2
0.230
0,310
141 /2A 122/3
0,120
141/2B 0.150 123/1
0,120
141/2C 0.140 123/2
0.120
141 /4A 0.070 124/1
0.360
141/4B 0.160 124/2
0.140
141/4C 0.160 125
0.210
141/4D 0.270 126
0.030
142/1
0.840 127
0,100
142/2 0,010 128/1
0.380
142/3
0.020
0.380
128/2
143/1
0.010 128/3
0.380
143/2
0,010 128/4
0.230
143/3
1.050 128/5
0.440
0.010
143/4
128/6
0.400
144
0.850 129/1
0.310
145/1
0.690 129/2
0.330
0.020
145/2
130
0,510
146/1
0.360 131
0.140
0.370
146/2
132
0.490
146/3
0,070 133
0.160
146/4
0.280 134
1.140
146/5
0.420
0.540
135
0.190
147/1
136/1
0.400
147/2
0.150 136/2
0,230
147/3
0.070 136/4
0.150
147/4
0.320 136/5
0,360
0.280
147/5
136/6
0,060
0.310
147/6
136/7
0.220
148/1
0.430 136/3A 0.200
0.010
148/2
136/3B 0.140
148/3
0.370 137
0.280
148/4
0.010 138/1
0.230
148/6
0.190 138/3 0.160
0.150
148/7
138/4 0.140
148/8
0.370 138/5
0.110
0,320
148/5A 138/6
0.160
148/5B 0.320 138/7
0,410
0,360
149/1
138/8
0.250
149/2
0.010 138/9
0.150
0.020
149/3
138/10A 0.060
0,020
149/4
138/10B 0.190
150/1
0.630
0.090
138/2A
0.280
150/2
138/2B 0.090
150/3
0.630 139.
0.170
150/4 0.210
0,460
140/3
150/5
0.235
0.300
140/1A
150/6
0.010 140/1B 0,300
151
1.520 4759 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारतका राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
2
3
165/2A 0.440 152/1
0.570
तेनमेलपाक्कम(जारी )
तैगमेलपाक्कम(जारी )
165/2B 1,570 152/2 0.410
166/1A 0.090 152/3
0.020
166/1B 0.020 152/4 0.340
166/1C 0.020 152/5
0.330
166/1D 0,070 152/6 0.020
166/ 1E 0,090
0.400
153/1
166/1F 0.070 153/2 0.020
166/1G 0.040 154/1
0.350
0,060
166/2A 154/2 -0.410
166/2B 0.110 154/3
0.140
166/2C 0.200 154/4
0.580
166/2D 0.200 154/5
0.070-
0.250
166/2E 154/6
0,320
167/2 0.480
0.050
154/7A
167/1A 0.100
0.200
154/7B
167/1B 0.620 155/1
0.140
167/1C 0.790 155/2 0.190
168/1
1.000 155/3
0.100
168/2A 0.190
0.020
155/4
168/2B 0.170 156/1
0.430
168/2C 0,190
0.060
156/2
168/2D 0.160 156/4 0.060
169/1
0.630
169/2
1.350
0.060
156/3A
170
0.170 156/3B 0.140
171/1
0.490
0.100
156/5A
171/2 0.230 156/5B 0.060
0.250
171/3
0.410
157/2
172/1
0.490 157/3 0.980
172/2A 0.880 157/1A1 0.140
172/2B 0.840 157/ 1A2 0.020
173/1
0.360 157/1B 0.110
173/2
0.840 158/1
0.560
173/3
0.350
0,770
158/2
174/1
0.740 159
0.350
174/2A1 0.060
0.570
160
174/2A2 0,060
0.270
161/1
0,680
174/2B
0.260
161/2
175/1
0.310
0.480
162/1
175/2 0.460
0.670
162/2A
0.770
176/1 162/2B 0.020
0.310
176/2
0.280
162/3A
176/3
0,360
0.200
162/3B
176/4
0.620
0.420
162/3C
0.670
177
0.930
163
178/1A1 0.400
0.270
164
0.070
178/1A2 165/ 1E1 0.320
178/1A3 0.280
0.100
165/ 1E2
0.040
178/1A4
0.840
165/1A
178/1B 0,320
0.220
165/1B
0,280
178/2A
0.040
165/ 1C
178/2B 0.270
0.010
165/ 1D
0.440
179/2 165/1F 0.470 4760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
3
179/ 1A1A 0.170 तेनमेलपाक्कम(जारी )
179/ 1A1B 0.350
179/ 1A2 0.350
179/1B 0,400
180/1
0,400
0.720
180/2
0.330
180/3
0.170.
181/1 .
0.170
181/2
0.270
182/1
182/3
0.150
182/5
0.380
182/2A 0.070
0.420
182/2B
182/4A 0.370
182/4B 0.260
183/1
0,700
183/3
0.350
0.670
183/2A
0.670
183/2B
0,350
184/1
0.560
184/2
0.420
184/3A
0.730
184/3B
0,140
184/3C1
0.140
184/3C2
185/1
0,400
0.200
185/3
185/4
0.440
0.540
185/5
185/2A 0.310
185/2B 0.370
0.070
185/2C
1.040
186
187
0.050
€790
188
1.060
189/2
0,100
189/3
0.460
189/1A
0.140
189/1B
190/1
0.530
0,420
190/2
0.590
190/3
191/1
0.230
0.910
191/2
192/1
0.350
0.200
192/2
0.590
192/3
0.640
192/4
(0,490
192/5
193
0.850
194/1
1.040
194/2
1.100
195
0.440
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ⅱ)
2
3
196
0,620 तेनमेलपायकम(जारी )
197
0,800
0.590
198
199/1
1.300
0.250
199/2
200/1
0.520
200/2 0.260
0.490
31/1
0.300
201/3
0.560
201/2A
201/2B 0.510
0,300
201/4 A
201/4B 0.400
202
0.350
203/2
0.190
0.430
203/3
203/1A 1.110
203/1B 0.280
203/1C 0.140
0.460
204/1
204/4
0.420
0,350
204/2A
0.360
204/2B
0.400
204/3A
204/3B 0.250
0,580
205/1
205/2
1.000
205/3
1,000
205/4
0,640
0.610
205/5
0.640
205/6
0.520
205/7
0,510
205/8
0.460
205/9
0.440
205/10
0.350
205/11
0.400
205/12
0.490
205/13
0.650
205/14
0.560
205/15
0.280
205/6
205/17
1.220
205/18 1.190
205/19 1.280
205/20 0.560
0.650
205/21
0.850
206
0.720
207/
202
0.680
207/3
0,300
207/4
0.730
207/5
0.400
207/6
0.210
207/7
0.140 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927 1
2
1
3.
207/8
0.280
4761 2
3
24/ 1A2A 0.490
वीरपुरम ( जारी )
तेनमेलपाक्कम(जारी )
207/9
0.640
207/10 0.360
0.400
207/11
20712 0.190
207/13 0.200
0,320
207/14
0.280
207/15
0.480
207/16
207/17 0.680
207/18 0.370
207/19 0.320
207/20 0.280
208/1
1.620
0.460
208/2
209/1
2.030
0.070
209/2
0.420
209/3
0.720
210/1
0.360
210/2
0.320
210/3
0.380
210/4
210/5 0.360
0,200
210/6
0.200
210/ 10A
0.140
210/ 11A
0.190
210/ 12A
0.230
210/ 13A
0.120
210/ 14A
210/14B 7.680
0.580
210/7A
0,210
210/8A
0.250
210/9A
0.250
13/1A
बीरपुरम
0.070
13/1B
0.310
14/2B1
0,200
14/2B2
0.200
14/2C1
0.580
14/2C2.
0.510
20/3A
0.510
20/3B
21
0.140
0.320
22/ 1A
0.320
22/1B
0.120
22/ 1C
0.150
22/ 1D
22/ 1E
0.150
0.110
23/2
0.070
23/ 1A
0.140
23/1B
23/1C
0.020
0,590
24/ 1A1A
0.270
24/ 1A1B
0.220
24/ 1A1C
1358 GI /2005-2
24/1A2B 0.440
24/1B
1.030
0.350
24/2A1
24/2A2 0.360
24/2B2 0.350
25/1
0.350
0.360
25/2
26/1
0.750
0,700
26/3
0.410
26/4.
26/5
0.410
0.820
26/6
26/2A 0.320
0.580
26/2B
0,300
27/1
0.140
27/2
0.140
27/3
28
0.580
0.440
29/2
0.780
29/ 1A
29/1B
0,400
0.350
29/ 1C
0.320
29/1D
0.490
32/2
0.320
33/1
0.950
34/2
0.510
34/3
0.250
34/1A1
34/ 1A2 0.230
0.140
34/1A3
34/1A4 0.120
0.190
34/1B1
0.170
34/1B2
0.120
34/ 1C1
34/1C2 0.120
0.110
34/1C3
0.560
35/2
0.110
35/1A
0.150
35/1B
36/2
0.250
0.060
36/1A
0.070
36/1B
0.310
37/1
0.360
37/2
0.480
37/3
0.310
37/4A
0.400
37/4B
0.140
38/1
0,100
38/2
0.960
39/1
0.610
39/3E1
0.050
39/3E2
0.830
39/2A 4762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927 1
2
3
1
39/2B1 0.700
वीरपुरम-(जारी)
वीरपुरम-(जारी )
39/2B2 0.570
39/2B3 0.610
39/3A 0.160
39/3B
0.190
39/3C
0.630
39/3D1 0.250
39/3D2 0.050
39/3D3 0,250
40/1
0,330
40/2A1 0.150
40/2A2 0.100
40/2B
0.230
41/1
0,360
41/2
0,310
41/3
0.360
42/ 1A1A 0.410
0.020
42/1A1B
42/1A2 0,170
42/1B1 0.040
42/1B2 0.200
42/1B3 0,330
42/ 2A1 0.470
42/2A2 0.480
42/2B
0.770
43/2
0.590
43/3
0.235
43/ 1A
0.160
43/1B1 0.320
43/1B2 0.060
0.420
43/1B3
44/3
0.620
44/1A 0.140
44/1B
0.170
44/2A1 0.300
44/2A2A 0.040
44/2A2B 0.050
44/2A2C 0,100
44/2B1 0.090
44/2B2 0.110
44/2C1A 0.020
44/2C1B 0.020
44/2C1C 0.050
44/2C2A 0.010
44/2C2B 0.040
44/2C2C 0.050
45/1
1,720
45/2
0.610
45/3
0.650
46/1
0,350
46/2A 0,320
46/2B
0,280
46/2C
0.330
47
0.310
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2'
3
48/1A 0.410
48/1B
0.010
48/1C
0.170
48/2A 0.980
48/2B
0.990
0.260
49
50
0.230
0,270
51/1
1.210
51/2
0.070
51/3
0.620
51/4
51/5
0,270
0,280
52
0.040
53/ 1A
0.440
53/1B
0.060
53/2A
0.440
53/2B
0.470
53/2C
0.490
53/2D
0.510
54/1
0.200
54/2A
0,320
54/2B
55/4
0.640
0.350
55/ 1A
0.670
55/1B
55/2A 0.440
55/2B
1.060
0.700
55/2C
55/2D 0.070
55/3A 1.210
0.590
55/3B
1.030
56/1
56/2
0.940
57
1.670
58
1.330
1.070
59/1
1.070
59/3
1.070
59/2A
0.320
59/2B
0.230
59/2C
0.270
59/2D
0.120
59/2E
59/2F
0.020
0.100
59/2G
60
3.225
1.050
61/ 1A2A1
0.430
61/ 1A2A2
1.200
61/1B2B
62/1
2.260
62/2A 0.580
0.070
62/2B
0.270
62/2C1
0,320
62/2C2
62/2D
0.620 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927 1
2
3
1
0.070
63/2
बीरपुरम-(जारी )
4763 2
3
5
0.830
हनुमानताय-(जारी
63/3
0.380
63/4
0.850
63/6
0,370
63/7
0.620
63/1A 0.110
63/1B
0.280
63/5A 0.330
63/5B 0.040
64/1
0.820
64/2
0.840
65/1
0.270
65/2
0.440
66/1
0.320
:
66/2
0.330
67/1A 0.360
67/2A 0.040
67/2B 0.560
67/2C
0.440
73/ 1A1 0.850
73/1A2 $ 480
73/1A3
73/1B
73/1C
0.220
73/ 1D 0210
0.690
73/2A
73/2B
$1,330
73/2C
73/2D
74/ 1B
7424
6.470
1.140
77/1
0.140
7712
0.210
77/3
0.160
77/4
0.110
77/5A 0.050
77/5B 0.040
77/5C
0.050
77/6A1 0.110
77/6A2 0.140
77/6B1 0.120
96
1.450
97/1
1,280
2/2
0.440
हनुमानताय
0.470
2/ 1A
2/ 1B1
1.090
2/3A
0.060
2/3B
0.110
2/3C
0.250
3
2.850
4
0,730
6
0.580
7/1
0,820
7/2
1.410
0.220
8/1
8/2
0,170
8/3A
0.060
0.020
8/3B
8/3C
0.050
8/3D
0.040
0.070
8/3E
8/3F
0,480
0.200
8/3G
0.050
8/3H
9
0,440
10
1.050
0.200
11/2
0.280
11/3
0.740
0.320
11/4
12
1.100
13
0.620
1.200
14
15/1
0.650
0.620
15/2
15/3
0.640
16
0.610
17/1..
0.310
17/2
0.310
17/3
0.620
1.280
18/1
0.330
18/2A
18/2B
0,320
19/1
0.310
19/2
0.350
20/1
0,280
20/5
0,370
20/6
0.320
20/7
0.730
20/2A 0.320
20/2A 0.730
0,300
20/3A
0.310
20/3B
20/4A 0.150
20/4B
0.170
20/4C
0,150
20/4D 0.150
20/8A 0,330
20/8B
0.380
26/1
0.360
26/2
0.350
0.750
27
0.610
28
0.280
29/1 4764
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927 1
2
3
1
29/2
0310
हनुमानताय-(जारी )
हनुमानताय-(जारी)
30/2
0.580
30/1A 0.380
30/1B 0.270
0.020
30/1C
30/1D
0.020
250
30/ 1E
0.270
30/1F
0.650
31
32
0.610
0.300
33/1
33/2
0.310
34/ 1A 0.350
0.150
34/1B
पारनूर
0.190
34/ 1C
34/2A 0,320
0.270
34/2B
35/1
0.310
0.310
35/2
0.680
36
0,650
37/2
0.300
37/1A
0,310
37/1B
0.220
38/1A
0.230
38/1B
0.220
38/ 1C
0.320
38/2A
38/2B 0.250
0.100
38/2C
0.090
38/2D
0.100
38/2E
38/2F
(0,270
0.700
39
40/1
0.440
0.470
40/2
0.480
41 / 1A
0.150
41/ 1B
41 /2A 0.350
0.280
41/2B
0.310
41 /3A
0.310
41/3B
0,410
59/1
0.410
59/2
1.100
59/3
0.570
60/3
60/4
0.400
60/1A 0.150
0.250
60/1B
0,490
60/2A
0,270
60/2B1
0,310
60/2B2
61
1.640
0,490
62
223/1
0,470
2
3
223/2
0.480
0.670
223/3
0.300
223/4
223/6
0.540
0.360
223/7
225/1
0.210
225/2
0.220
225/3
0.230
0.280
226/1
0.480
226/2
0.940
226/3
0,280
226/7
0.650
226/8
0.280
9/ 1A
9/1B
1.110
0.050
9/2A
9/2B
0.060
0.200
11 /1A1
11/1A2 0.100
11/ 1B 0,320
0.020
11/2A1
0.280
11/2A2
0,070
11/2B1
11/2B2 0.175
11 /3A 0.330
0.170
11/3B
0.020
11/3C
0,600
13/1
0.620
13/2
14
0.590
0.285
15/1
0.285
15/2
0.460
15/3
0,090
16/1
0.050
16/2
0.130
16/3
0.200
16/4
16/5
0.220
16/6
0.220
16/7
0.190
0.110
17/ 1A1
0.100
17/1A2
17/ 1B
0.020
0.070
17/2A
0.100
17/2B
0.110
17/2C
0.330
18
0.720
19/1
0.210
19/5
0.010
19/2A
0,020
19/2B
19/2C
0,060
0.010
19/3A
19/3B
0.020 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4765
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
19/3C
0.090
प्ररनूर-(जारी )
पारनूर-(जारी)
0.070
19/4A
0.060
19/4B
0.590
20/1
20/2
0.530
20/3A 0.230
20/3B
0.350
21/1
0,570
21/2
0.620
0.360
22/1
0.350
0.360
22/3
0.390
23/1
23/2
0.175
0.175
23/3
23/4
0.380
0.370
24/1
0.370
24/2
0,400
24/3
0,690
25/1
25/2
0.400
0.370
25/3
0,075
26/ 1A
26/1B *0.090
26/1C
0.090
0.090
26/1D
0.075
26/2A
26/2B
0.070
26/2C
0.090
0.070
26/2D
27/1
0.620
27/2
0,280
27/4
0.310
(0.280
27/5
0,190
27/3A
27/3B 0.100
0.160
27/3C
0.140
27/3D
0.200
28/1
0.090
28/4
28/2A 0.160
28/2B 0.140
0.230
28/3A
0,020
28/3B
0.040
28/5A
0.040
28/5B
0.110
29
0,110
30/1
30/2
0.140
0.020
30/3
30/4
0.040
30/5
0.040
0.170
30/6
31
(0.070
2
3
33
0.560
0.640
34/1
34/2
0.650
34/3
0.620
35/1
0.210
35/2
0.320
35/3
0.260
36/1
1.120
36/2
0.960
37
0.380
38
2.360
0.250
39/1
39/2
0.260
0.600
39/3
0.610
40
41
1.610
0.070
42
43/1
0.620
1.150
43/2
0.350
44/1
0.560
44/2
0,570
44/3
45/1
0.480
45/2
0.580
46/1A 0.490
46/1B2 0.940-
0.630
47/1
0.830
47/2
48
0.150
0.270
49/2
49/3
0.720
49/1A 0,110
49/1B
0.070
0.050
49/ 1C
0.530
50
0.300
51/1
0.260
51/2
52/1
0.600
52/2
0.600
0.555
52/3
0.590
53/1
0.555
53/2
0.650
54
55
0.610
56
0.720
0.070
76B/ 1A
0.070
76B/1B
76B/1C 0.070
0.070
76B/ ID
0.300
76B/ IE
76B/ IF 0.070
0.070
76B/1G
0.440
77
0.410
78A/3 4766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
78A/21
पारनूर-(जारी )
0.030
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
80/13
0.230
पारनूर-(जारी )
0,040
78A/ 2A
78A/2B 0.080
78A/2C 0.040
78A/2D 0.010
0.010
78A/2E
78A/2F 0.040
78A/2G1 0.025
0.075
78A/2G2
78A/2H1 0.185
78A/2H2 0.010
0,050
78A/2J
0.020
78A/2K
78A/2L 0.190
78A/2M 0.160
78A/2N 0.150
78A/20 0.150
78A/2P 0.260
0.310
78A/2Q
0.040
78A/2R
78A/2S 0.040
78A/2T 0.140
78A/2U 0.040
78A/2V 0.060
78A/2W 0.100
78A/41 0.070
78A/4A 0.040
18A/4B1 0.010
78A/4B2 0.040
0.100
78A/4C
78A/4D 0.110
78A/4E 0.090
78A/4F 0.090
78A/4G 0.150
78A/4H 0.190
78A/4J 0.060
78A/4K 0.060
78A/4L 0,060
78A/4M 0.090
78A/4N 0.150
79B/ 1A 0.020
79B/1B 0.050
79B/1C 0,020
0.020
79B/ 1D
0.050
79B/ 1E
79B/1F 0.050
79B/1G 0.070
79B/ 1H 0.020
0.060
80/3
0.040
80/4
0.345
80/7
80/8
0.355
80/10
0.050
80/12
0.100
80/14
1.185
80/16
0.230
0.070
80/ 15A
80/15B 0.070
80/15C 0.170
80/ 1A 0.050
80/1B
0.020
80/2A 0,040
0.025
80/2B
80/5A 0.040
80/5B
0.040
80/6A1 0.070
80/6A2 0.100
80/6B
0.190
80/9A 0.190
80/9B 0.160
81
0.350
82/1
0.570
82/2
0.290
82/3
0,290
83/2
0.370
83/ 1A1 0.170
83/1A2 0.060
83/1B
0,090
83/ 1C 0,090
0.050
84/2
84/ 1A 0.040
84/1B
0.160
0.120
85/1
85/2
0.150
85/3
0.170
85/4
0.160
86
0.540
0.490
87/1
87/2
0.330
87/3
0,240
0.870
88/1
88/2
0.360
0.210
88/3A
88/3B
0.370
89/2
0.570
0345
89/1A
89/1B
0.200
90/1
0.510
90/2
0.540
0.570
91/1
0.560
91/2
92/1
0.540
0,590
92/2
0,590
93
0.050
94
95
0.570
96/1
0,520 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4767
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
3
1-
1
2
96/2
0.810
पारनूर-(जारी) पारनूर-(जारी )
0.570
97/1
97/2
0.560
0.540
97/3
98
1.950
0,360
99/1
99/2
0.430
100/1
0.440
100/2
0.280
101/1
1.240
0.100
101/2A
101/2B 0,100
101/2C 0.220
102/1
0.280
102/2
0.070
102/3
0.320
102/5
0.140
102/6
0.290
102/7
0.140
102/4A 0.050
102/4B 0.110
102/4C 0.190
0.140
102/4D
102/4E 0.150
103/1
0.345
103/4
1.590
0.230
103/2A
103/2B 0.280
0.320
103/2C
0.100
103 /3A
0.090
103/3B
103/3C 0.090
103/3D 0.100
0.070
103/3E
103/3F 0,100
103/5A 0.140
0.050
103/5B
103/5C 0.400
103/5D 0,300
103/5E 0.040
104/1
1.530
0,140
104/2A
104/2B 0.280
104/2C1 0.120
140/2C2 0.160
0.560
105/1
105/2A 0.210
105/2B 0.040
105/2C 0.025
0.025
105/2D
106
0.140
107/1
0.190
0.190
107/2
107/4
0.510
2
3
0,160
107/3A1
107/3A2 0.160
0.170
107/3A3
107/3B 0.480.
108
0.640
0.020
109/ 1A1
109/1A2 0.320
109/1B 0.020
109/1C 0,350
0.050
109 /2A
109/2B 0,350
0,280
109/2C
110/1 0.580
110/2A 0,070
110/2B 0.190
0.150
110/2C
0.120
111
112/1
0.310
112/2
0.210
0.070
112/3
112/4
0.060
112/5
0.190
112/6
0.050
112/7
0.190
0.580
113/1
113/2
0.480
0.400
114/1
0.410
114/2
0.060
115
0.460
116/1
0.930
116/2
0.510
116/3
117/1
0.455
0,560
117/2
118
0.790
0.135
119/2
119/3
0.150
0.150
119/1A
0.150
119/1B
0.930
120/1
0.560
120/2
0.440
120/3
0.410
121/1
121/2
0.320
0.050
121 /3A
121/3B 0.400
122/1
0.380
0.380
122/2
123
0.260
0,780
124/1
0.660
124/2
0.560
125/1
0.540
125 /2A
0,540
125/2B 4768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927 1
2
3
1
126/1
0.490
पारनूर-( जारी )
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 2
3
151/5
0.420
पारनूर-(जारी )
126/2 0.120
0.070
126/3A
126/3B 0,520
127/1
0.570
127/2
0.580
128/1 0,560
128/2
0.570
129/1
0,590
129/2
0,520
130/1
0.590
130/2 0,530
0.520
131
1.200
132/1
132/2 0,580
132/3
0,140
0.320
133/1
133/2
0.260
133/3
0.580
133/4
0.300
134/2
0.570
134/1A 0,560
134/ 1B 0.530
142/ 1A 0.150
142/ 1B 0.170
142/2A1 0,020
142/2A2 0.020
142/2B 0,060
142/3A1 0.020
0.020
142/3A2
142/3B1 0.010
0.060
142/3B2
143
1.160
144/1
0.330
1280
144/2
144/3
050000
144/4
0200
145/1
0.570
145/2A 0.190
145/2B
142C 0.210
14/1
0.380
0.590
147/2
0.610
147/3
148/1
0.020
0.060
148/2
149
1.200
150/1
0,200
0,440
150/2
0.220
150/3
0.420
151/1
0.100
151/2
151/3
0.070
151/4
0.120
151/6
0.380
151/8
0.250
151/9
0.100
151/10 0.100
0.530
151 /7A
597B 0.250
0.610
152/2
0,580
0.670
153
154/1
0,560
0.630
154/2
0.360
154/3
0.260
154/4
155/1
0.530
155/2
0.580
156
0.040
0.820
157/1
0.060
157/2
0.860
157/3
0.555
158
0.540
159
160
1.210
161/1
0.270
161/2
0.410
0,270
161/3
0,420
161/4
0.380
161/5
162
0.210
163
0,090
164
0.670
165
0.050
166
0.930
0.570
167/1,2B
167/2A1 0.010
0.010
167/2A2
167/2A3 0.010
168/1A 0.200
0,200
168/ 1B
168/ 1C 0.140
1682A 0.035
0.070
1682B
168/2C (070
168/2D 0110
168/3A 0.120
0090
168/3B
0.090
168/3C
0.480
0.300
170/1
0.320
170/2
171
0.410
172
0.350
173/1
0,360
173/2 0.690 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4769
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
0.665
173/3
पारनूर-(जारी) पारनूर (जारी )
173/5 0.120
173/4A 0.120
173/4B 0.120
0.240
173/4C
1.090
174/1
174/2
0.260
0.200
174/3
174/4 0.140
174/5
0.310
174/6
0.020
175
0.150
176/1 0.190
0.200
176/2
176/3
0.730
178/1
0.350
0,340
178/3
178/2A 0.280
178/2B 0.010
178/2C 0.200
178/2D 0.270
184
0.975
189/1
0.280
0.270
189/2
190
0.140
191
0.260
192/1
0.180
0.120
192/2
193
0.230
194/1
0.100
0.100
194/2
194/3
0.320
0,300
194/4
0.160
194/5
0.150
194/6
1.750
195/1
0.040
195/2
0.480
196
0.800
197
राजाकुलिपेट्टै
0,500
198
1.610
202/1
202/2 0.100
203/1
0.360
0,330
203/2
203/3
0.300
204/1
0,320
.0.220
204/2
204/3
0.210
204/4
0.250
204/5
0,240
0.555
205
206/1
1.220
206/2
1.210
206/3
1.185.
1358GI/2005-3
3
2
207/1
0.455
0,410
207/2
221
0.080
0.570
223/1
0,700
223/2
0.250
225/1
225/2 0.790
0.480
225/3
0.110
225/4
226
0.900
0.260
227
0.120
228/1
0.040
228/2
0.040
228/3
228/4
0.110
0.330
228/5
0.120
228/6
0.200
228/7
0.220
228/8
230
0.390
0.740
231/3
0.110
231 / 1A
0.110
231/1B
231/ IC 0.110
0.100
231/1D
0.100
231/1E
0.450
231/2A
0.270
231/2B
0.410
232/1
0.510
232/2A
0,520
232/2B
0.510
233
2.170.
249/1
0.740
249/2
0.765
249/3
249/4
0.380
0.490
249/5
0.260
249/6
0.100
4A/ 1A
0.050
4A/ 1B
4A/1C 0,100
0.040
4A/ ID1
0.120
4A/ 1D2
0.380
4A/ 1D3
0.120
4A/ 1E
4A/ 1F 0.120
0.070
4A/ 1G
0.090
4A/1H
0.440
4A/ 11
0,400
4A/ 1J
0.400
4A/ 1K
3.310
4A/2A
0,100
4A/3A
0.120
4A/3B 4770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
1
2
3 4A/3C 0.160
32/5
0.140 राजाकुलिपेट्टै-(जारी )
राजाकुलिपेट्ट (जारौं )
4A/3D
32/6
0.120
0.010 4A/4A 0.050
0.050
32/ 1A
4A/4B 0.170
0.300
32/1B
4A/4C 0.310
0.300
32/1C
5/2
0.190
0.300
32/2A
5/3
0.260
0.300
32/2B
5/5
0,310
0.070
32/3A
5/6
0.360.
0.110
32/3B1
5/8
0,300
32/3B2 0.110
0.020
5/1A
0,060
32/4A
5/1B
0.060
0.040
32/4B1
5/1C
0,020
0.060
32/4B2
5/ 1D
0.360
0.780
1/1
तेनमेलपाक्कम
5/1E
0,060
0.490
1/2
5/4A
0.090
0,580
1/3
5/4B
0.010
0.070
2/2
5/4C
0.040
0,400
2/3
5/4D
0.040
0.350
2/ 1A
5/4E
0.120
0.230
2/1B
5/4F
0,120
0.620
2/1C1
5/7Α
0.190
0.270
2/ 1C2
5/7B
0,360
0.270
2/1C3
6/1
0.300
0.270
2/1C4
0.280
6/2A
3/2
0,040 6/2B1 0.160
0.280
3/1A
6/2B2 0.170
0.250
3/1B1
7/3
0.150
3/1B2 0.310 7/ 1A
0.380
0.310
3/1B3
7/1B
0,110
0.070
3/1C
7/ 1C
0.160
3/1D
0.110 7/2A
0,210
4/1
1.090 7/2B
0,190
4/4
0.010 8/2
0.160
0.360
4/2A
8/1A
0.300
0.070
4/2B
8/ 1B
0.220
4/2C
0.020 8/1C
0.210
0.150
4/2D
9
0.520
0.060
4/3A
10/1
1.070
0.270
4/3B
10/2
0,200
4/3C1
0.270 10/3
0.990
0.020
4/3C2
10/4
0.110
5/1
0.350
0.590
0.420
5/2
11/2
0,280
0.910
6/1
11/3
0.490
6/2
0.020 12/1
0.460
0.680
7/1
12/2
0.420
7/12
0.750 12/3
0,250
8
1.730 12/4
0.830
0.148
9/1
12/5
3,890
9/3
0.440 30/1
0.440
0.350
9/2A
30/2
1.720
0.210
9/2B1
30/3
0.060
0.220
9/2B2
30/4
0.280
9/2C
0.250 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4771 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
2
3 9/2D
0.250
0.420 तेनमेलपाक्कम (बारी )
100/7B
वीरपुरम-(जारी)
0.990
10
100/8A 0.750
1.250
11
100/8B 0.490
0.050
12/ 1A
100/8C 1,510 12/1B 0.070
106/1 0.220
0.770
12/1C
106/2 0.200 12/1D 0,630
0.320
106/3
0.020
12/18
106/5
0.620 12/1F 0.020
106/4A 0.160 12/1G
0.230
106/4B 0,070 12/2A 0.540
0.070
106/4C
12/2B 0.020
0.640
106/6A
12/2C 0.530
0.280
106/6B
12/3A 0.310
106/6C 0.110
1.010
12/3B
0.140
106/7A
13
1.150
106/7B 0,260 14/1
0:430
106/8A 0.330
0.420
14/2
106/8B1 0.320
0,640
15/2
0.310
106/8B2 15/3
107
0.350
0.840 15/1A 0.140
108/1
0.840 15/1B 0.580
108/2
0,800
2.900
117/1
16
2.360
बीरपुरम
0.460
118/1
17
2.170
0.260
118/2
18/ 1A1 1.010
0.220
118/3
18/1A2 0.020
0,350
118/5
18/1B1 0.440
0.060
118/7
18/1B2 0.020
0.020
118/4A
0.580
18/1B3
118/4B 0.140 18/1B4 0.200
0.050
118/4C
2.000
: 19/1
118/6A 0.330
2.480
20/1
0.060
118/6B
0.420
20/2A
0.310
20/281
650.208
टेक्नो वि. आ. अं. का कुल क्षेत्र
20/2B2 0.400
20/2B3 0,200
20/2C 1.200
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .
0.060
22/2A
Trichy, the 29th April, 2005 22/2B
0.300
22/2C 0.400
No. 02/2005 (Ν.Τ.)
22/2D 0.350
(Issued under Section 8(b) ofthe customs Act) 24/3
1.930
0.360
24/2B1
100/3
1.250
100/5 0.160
100/6 0.310
100/1A 0.010
0,680
100/1B
Sub: Declaration of SEZ for Information Technology , Hardware and Bio -Informatics at Mahindra City, Taluk Chengalpattu , District Kanchepurain in the State of Tamilnadu as a limits of Customs Area for the purpose of unloading of imported goods and loading of export goods .
100/1C 0.690
100/2A 1.050
0.490
100/2B
Ref: (i) Department of Revenue Notification No. 27/2005- Cus(NT) dated01-04-2005 notifying the SEZ under section 76 A of Customs Act .
0,490
100/4A
100/4B 0.740
100/7A
(ii)-Para 15 ofDepartment of Revenue Circular No. 68/2003 -Customs dated 30-07-2003 .
0,380 4772
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
1
2
3
35/2
0.460
Thenmelpakkam-(Contd.)
36/1
0,280
36/3
0,960
36/2A
0.400
0.410
36/2B
0.250
37/1
37/2
0.890
37/4
0.440
37/3C
0.410 S. O. 1765. In exercise of the powers conferred onme under Section 8 ( b ) of the Customs Act (52 of 1962 ) read with Circular No. 68 /2003 - Customs of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I Jayendranath, Commissioner of customs , Tiruchirapalli hereby declare the SEZ for Information Technology, Hardware and Bio-Informatics at Mahindra City, Taluk Chengalpattu , District Kanchepuram in the State of Tamilnadu comprising of survey numbers as notified in the Gazette of India , G.S.R. 211 (E) dated 01-04-2005 and mentioned on the Annexure to this notification as Customs Area for the limited purpose of unloading of imported goods and loading export goods .
0.020
37/3D
[F. C. No. VIII/48/ 13/2005- Cus . Pol. ]
0.150
38/2
JAYENDRANATH , Commissioner
38/1A
0.560 ANNEXURE
0.070
38/1B
Techno Park -SEZ Processing Area
39/2
0.400
39/ 1A1 0.330 District : Kancheepuram
0.360
39/1A2A Taluk : Chengalpattu
39/1A2B 0.070 Name of the Village
0.680
39/1B
Extent in Acres
Survey Number
0.570
40/1
260/3E 0.080
Anjur
0.560
40/2
326
0.070
0.400
41
2,630 327
0,300
42/1
0.540
42/2
0.110
328
0.400
42/3
0.260
16
Thenmelpakkam
0.650
43
0.430
17/2
0.640
44
0.320
17/ 1A
0,400
45/1
0.420
17/1B
0.610
45/2
18
0.170
0,780
45/3
19
0.110
0.490
46/1
0,650
20
0.490
46/2
21/1
1.060
0.620
46/3
0.580
21/2
0.620
47/1
0.300
0.330
47/2
0.300
22/ 1A
0.028
47/3
0.540
22/1B
48/1
0.140
0.260
22/1C
0.950
48/2
26/1
0.210
48/3
0.190
0.780
26/2
0.250
48/4
0.060
26/3
0.300
48/5
0.750
28/1
0.650
49/1
0.610
28/2
1.330
49/2
0,260
31/1
0.560
49/3
0.860
31/2A1
0.650
50/2
1,445
31/2A2
0.400
50/1A
0.310
32/1
50/1B1 0.020 32/2
0,140
0.370
50/1B2
0.050
32/3
0.310
51/1
0.380
33/2
0.360
51/2
0.320
33/ 1A
0.280
51/3
0.420
34/1
51/4
0,400
0.430
34/2
0.040
51/5
0.410
34/3
51/6
0,060 34/4
0.410
52/1
0.330
0.460
35/1 4773 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
1
3
1
2
3
0.360
52/2
82
0,410 Thenmelpakkanm-(Contd.)
Thenmelpakkam(Contd.)
52/3
0.020
83/ 1A 0.220 52/4
0.530
83/1B 0.010 52/5
0.010
83/2B 0.020 53/1
0.010
84/2
0.650 53/2
0.010
84/1A 0.220 53/3
0.560
84/1B 0,400 54/1
0.050
84/1C1 0.360
0.120
54/3
84/1C2 0.040 54/5
0,250
84/1C3 0,100 54/2A 0.800
84/1D
0.330 54/2B
0.350
85
0.210
0,200
86
54/4A
0.210 54/4B1 0.560
87/1
0,350
0.070
54/4B2
87/2
0.360 55/1
0.220
0.280
87/3A
0.120
55/2
83/7B 0.110 56/3
0,400
88
0.280 56/4
0.070
90/1
0.050 56/1A 0,370
90/2
0.400
0.460
90/4
0.250 56/1B1
56/1B2 0.590
90/5
0.120 56/2A 0,100
0.100
90/3A1 56/2B
90/3A2
0.100
0.100 56/2C 0.140
90/3B 0,190 57/1
0.360
90/6A 0.020
0.110
90/6B
57/2
0.110 58
0.270
91/2
0.140 59
0.040
0.120
91/1A
0.610
60/1
0.060
91/1B
60/2
0,880
91/3A 0.240 61/1
0,400
91/3B 0:260 61/2
0.400
102/1
0.070
0.930
61/3
102/2 0.050 62
0.190
103/1
0.100 63
0.090
0,140
103/2
64/1A 0.210
103/3
0.050 65
1.070
103/4 0.040 66
1.230
0.090
103/5
67
0.280
103/6
0.070 70
1.130
103/7
0,070 76/1
0.200
103/8 0.110 77/2B
0,300
0,750
104
0.750
77/3B
105/1
0,100 78
0.230
105/2
0.120
105/3
79/3
0.360
0.220
105/4
0.250
0.070 79/4
0.120
105/5 0.090 79/ 1A
0.040 79/1B 0.140.
105/6
0.020
105/7
0.270
79/2A1
0.070
105/8
79/2A2
0,020
0,020
0.690
105/10 79/2B
80
0.350
0.160
105/13
81
1.250
105/11A1 0.060 4774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
1
2
3 105/ 11A2 0.060
121/1
0.610 Thenmelpakkam-(Contd.)
Thenmelpakkam-(Contd. )
105/11B 0.070
0.270
121/2
0.040
105/ 12A
121 /3A 0.120 105/12B 0.040
121/3B 0.110 105/9A 0.010
122/1
0.420 105/9B 0.020
122/2
0,230 106/1
0,060
122/3
0.120 106/2
0.010
123/1
0.120 106/3
0,060
123/2 0.120 107/1
0.540
124/1
0.360
0.200
107/2
124/2 0.140
0.020
107/3
125
0.210 108
0,400
126
0.030 109
1.140
127
0,100 110/1
0.250
128/1
0.380 110/3
0,040
128/2
0.380 110/4
0,090
128/3
0.380 110/7
0,070
128/4
0.230 110/2A 0,060
128/5
0.440 110/2B 0.060
128/6
0.400 110/5A 0.090
129/1
0.310 110/5B 0,100
129/2
0.330 110/6A 0.070
130
0.510 110/6B 0.070
131
0,140
0.140
110/8A
132
0.490 110/8B 0.040
133
0.160 110/9A 0.050
134
1.140
0.060
110/9B1
0,540
135
110/9B2 0.170
0.400
136/1
111
3.380
136/2
0.230 112
0.330
136/4 0.150
0.220
113
0.360
136/5
114
0,330
136/6
0.060 115/1
0.200
0.220
136/7
115/2 0.230
136/3A 0.200
0.300
115/3
136/3B 0.140 115/5
0.410
137
0.280 115/6
0.560
138/1
0.230 115/4A1 (0.220
138/3 0.160 115/4A2 0.040
138/4
0.140 115/4B 0.190
138/5 0.110 116
0,410
138/6
0.160
0.230
117
0.410
138/7
0.210
0,250 118/1
138/8
118/3
0,210
138/9
0.150
0.060
118/4
138/ 10A 0.060 118/5
0.070
138/10B 0.190 118/6
0.120
138/2A 0.090 118/7 0.140
138/2B 0.090
0.170
118/2A
139
0.170
0.200
118/2B
140/3
0.460
0.320
118/2C
0,300
140/1A 119
0,270
140/1B 0.300 120
0.120
4360
140/1C 4775 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
3
1
2
2
3
1
152/2
0,410 140/ID 0.140
Thenmelpakkam (Contd.)
Thenmelpakkam(Contd.)
140/2A
152/3
0,770
0.020
0.340
152/4
140/2B 0.430
0.330
152/5
141/1
0,900
152/6 0.020 141/3 0.070
153/1
0.310
0,400 141 /2A
141/2B 0.150
0.020
153/2
0.140
141/2C
0.350-
154/1
0.070
141/4A
0.410
154/2
141/4B 0.160
154/3 0.140 141/4C 0.160
0.580
154/4
141/4D 0.270
154/5 0.070
0.840
142/1
0,320
154/6
142/2 0.010
0.050
154/7A 142/3
0.020
154/7B 0.200 143/1
0.010
0.140
155/1
0.010
143/2
155/2
0.190
1.050
143/3
155/3
0.100 143/4 0.010
155/4
0.020 144
0.850
0.430
156/1
0.690
145/1
156/2 0.060 145/2 0.020
156/4
0.060
0.360
146/1
0.060
0.370
156/3A 146/2
0.070
146/3
0.140
156/3B
(0.280
156/5A 0,100 146/4
146/5 0.420
156/5B 0.060 147/1
0.190
157/2 0.410 147/2 0.150
157/3 0.980
0,070
147/3
157/ 1A1 0.140
0.320
0.020 147/4
157/ 1A2 147/5
0.280
157/ 1B 0.110 147/6
0,310
158/1
0.560
0.430
148/1
158/2
0,770
0,010
148/2
159
0.350
0.370
148/3
0.570
160
0.010
148/4
161/1
0.270 148/6
0.190
0.260
161/2
148/7
0.150
0.480
162/1
0.370
148/8
0.670
162/2A
0.320
148/5A
162/2B 0.020 148/5B 0.320
0.280
162/3A
0.360
149/1
0,200
162/3B 149/2
0.010
0.420
162/3C
0.020
149/3
0.930
163
0.020
149/4
164-
0,270 150/1
0.630
165/ 1E1 0.320 150/2
0,280
165/ 1E2 0:100
0.630
150/3
0.840
165/ 1A 150/4 0.210
0,220
165/1B 150/5
0.235
165/1C 0,040 150/6
0.010
165/1D 0,010 151
1.520
0.470
165/1F
0.570
152/1
165/2A 0.440 4776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
3
2
165/2B 1.570 Thenmelpakkam ( Contd. )
166/1A 0,090
166/1B 0.020
166/ IC 0.020
166/1D 0.070
166/ 1E 0,090
166/1F 0.070
166/1G 0.040
0,060
166/2A
166/2B 0.110
166/2C 0.200
166/2D 0,200
0.250
166/2E
167/2
0.430
167/1A 0.100
0.620
167/ IB
167/1C 0.790
1.000
168/1
168/2A 0.190
168/2B 0.170
168/2C 0.190
168/2D 0.160
0.630
169/1
169/2
1.350
170
0.170
171/1
0.490
171/2 0.230
171/3
0.250
172/1
0.490
172/2A 0.880
172/2B 0.840
173/1
0.360
173/2 0.840
173/3
0,350
174/1
0.740
174/2A1 0.060
174/2A2 0.060
174/28 0,680
175/1
0.310
175/2
0.460
1761
0,770
1~6/2
0.310
176//3
0.360
1.6/4
0.620
177
0.670
0.400
178/ 1A1
178/1A2 0.070
0.280
178/ 1A3
178/1A4 0.040
178/ 1B 0.320
178 /2A 0.280
0.270
178/2B
179/2 0.440
0.170
179/ 1A1A
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
2
3
179/1A1B 0.350 Thenmelpakkam( Contd.)
0.350
179/1A2
0.400
179/ 1B
0,400
180/1
180/2
0.720
0.330
180/3
181/1
0.170
0.170
181/2
0.270
182/1
182/3
0.150
182/5
0.380
0.070
182 /2A
0.420
182/2B
182/4A 0.370
0.260
182/48
183/1
0.700
183/3
0.350
183/2A 0.670
183/2B 0.670
0.350
184/1
184/2
0.560
184/3A 0.420
0.730
184/3B
184/3C1 0.140
184/3C2 0.140
185/1
0.400
185/3
0,200
185/4
0.440
185/5
0.540
185/2A 0.310
0.370
185/2B
0.070
185/2C
186
1.040
187
0.050
18
0.790
189/2
1.060
189/3
0.100
0.460
189/1A
189/ 1B 0.140
190/1
0.530
190/2
0.420
190/3
0.590
191/1
0.230
191/2
0.910
192/1
0.350
192/2
0.200
192/3 0.30
192/4
0.640
192/5
0.490
193
0.850
194/1
1.040
194/2
1.100
195
0,440
196
0.620 4777
भारत का राज़पत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3
3
1
2 .
197
0.800
207/9
0.640 Thenmelpakkam( Contd. )
Thenmelpakkam (Contd . ).
198
0.590
207/10 0.360
1.300
199/1
0.400
207/11
0.250
207/12
199/2
0.190 200/1
0.520
0.200
207/13
200/2 0.260
207/14 0.320 201/1
0.490
207/15 0.280 201/3
0.300
207/16 0.480
0.560
201/2A
0.680
207/17
0.510
201/2B.
207/18 0.370 201/4A 0.300
0.320
207/19
0.400
201/4B
207/20 0.280
0.350
202
1.620
208/1
0.190
203/2
208/2
0.460 203/3
0.430
209/1
2.030 203/1A 1.110
209/2
0.070 203/1B 0,280
0.420
209/3
203/IC 0.140
0.720
210/1
204/1
0.460
210/2 0.360 204/4
0.420
210/3
0.320
0.350
204/2A
0.380
210/4
0.360
204/2B
210/5
0.360
0.400
204/3A
0,200
210/6
0.250
204/3B
210/ 10A 0.200 205/1
0,580
210/ 11A 0.140 205/2
1.000
210/ 12A 0.190 205/3
1.000
210/ 13A 0.230
0.640
205/4
210/ 14A 0.120 205/5
0.610
210/14B 7.680 205/6
0.640
0.580
210/7A 205/7 0.520
0.210
210/8A
205/8 0.510
210/9A 0.250 205/9
0.460
0.250
13/ 1A
Veerapuram
0.070 205/10 0.440
13/ 1B
0.350
205/11
14/2B1 0.310
0.400
0,200 205/12
14/2B2
0.490
205/13
14/2C1 0.200
0.650
0,580 205/14
14/2C2
0.510
0.560.
20/3A
205/15
205/16 0.280
0,510
20/3B
21
1.220
0.140 205/17
0,320
22/ 1A
205/18 1.190
0.320 205/19 1.280
22/ 1B
0.560
0.120 205/20
22/ 1C
0.650
205/21
22/ ID 0.150 206
0.850
0.150
22/ 1E
0.720
0.110
23/2
207/1
0.070
0.680
207/2
23 / 1A
0.300
23/ 1B
(0.140 207/3
0.020
0.730
23/1C
207/4
0.400
20775
24/1A1A 0.590
0.210
0.270 207/6
24/ 1A1B
24/ 1A1C 0.220 207/7
0.140
207/8 0.280
24/ 1A2A 0.490 1358 GI/2005-4 4778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] 2
3
3
1
2
24/ 1A2B 0.440
39/2B2 0.570 Veerapuram( Contd . )
Veerapuram-( Contd. )
24/ 1B
1.030
0.610
39/2B3
24/2A1 0.350
39/3A 0.160 24/2A2 0.360
0.190
39/3B
0.350
24/2B2
39/3C
0.630 25/1
0.350
39/3D1 0.250 25/2
0.360
39/3D2 0.050 26/1
0.750
39/3D3 0.250 26/3
0,700
40/1
0.330 26/4
0.410
40/2A1 0.150 26/5
0.410
40/2A2 0.100 26/6
0.820
40/2B 0.230 26/2A 0.320
41/1
0.360 26/2B
0.580
41/2
0.310 27/1
0,300
41/3
0.360 27/2
42/ 1A1A 0.410
0.140
27/3
(0.140)
42/ 1A1B 0.020 28
0,580
42/1A2 0.170 29/2
0,440
42/ 1B1 0.040 29/4 A
0.780
42/ 1B2 0,200 29/ 1B
0,400)
42/ 1B3 0.330 29/ 1C
0,350
42/2A1 (0.470 29/ ID
0,320
42/2A2 0.480
0.490
32/2
42/2B
(0.770 33/1
0.320
43/2
0.590 34/2
0.950
43/3
0.235 34/3
0.510
43/1A 0.160 34/ 1A1 0.2.50
43/1B1 0.320 34/ 1A2 0.230
43/ 1B2 0.060 34/ 1A3 (0.140
43/1B3 0.420 34/JA4 0.120
44/3
0,620 34/1B1 0.190
44/1A 0,140
0,170
34/ 1B2
44/1B
0.170 34/ 1C1 0,120
0.300
44/2A1
34/ 1C2 0.120
44/2A2A 0,040 34/ 1C3 0.110
44/2A2B 0.050 35/2
0,560
44/2A2C 0.100 35/ 1A 0.110
0.090
44/2B1
35/ IB
0,150
44/2B2 0.110 36/2
0,250
0.020
44/2CIA 36/ 1A
0,060
0.020
44/2C1B 36/ 1B
0,070
44/2CIC 0,050 37/1
0,310
44/2C2A 0.010 37/2
0,360
44/2C2B 0.040 37/3
0,480
44/2C2C 0,050 37/4A 0,310
45/1
1.720 37/4B
0,400
45/2
0.610 38/1
45/3
0.650
( 0.140
38/2
0.100
46/1
0.350 39/1
0,960
0.320
46/ 2A
0,610
39/3E1
46/2B
0.280
0,050
39/3E2
46/2C
0.330 39/2A
0.830
47
0,310 39/2B1 (0.70)
48/1A 0.410 4779 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
3
1
2
3
63/3
0.380
Veerapuram-( Contd. )
48/ 1B
0.010
Veerapuram-( Contd. )
63.4
0.850 48/ 1C
0.170
63/6
0.370 48/2A
0.980
63/7
0,620 48/2B
0.990
63/1A 0.110
0,260
49
63/ 1B
0.280
0230
50
63/5A 0.330
0.270
51/1
63/5B
0.040
1.210
51/2
64/1
0,820
0.070
51/3
64/2
0,840
0,620
51/4
0.270
65/1
51/5
0.270
65/2
0.440
0,280
52
66/1
0.320
0,040
53/ 1A
66/2
0.330
0.440
53/1B
0.360
67/1A
0.060
53/2A
76/2A 0.040
0.440
53/2B
67/2B
0.560
(0.470
53/2C
67/2C
0.440
0.490
53/2D
0.850
73/ JA1
0.510
54/1
73/ 1A2 0.480 54/2A 0.200
73/ 1A3 0.110
0.320
54/2B
73/ 1B
0.460 55/4 0,640
73/ 1C
0.220
0.350
55/ 1A
73/ 1D
0.210
0.670
55/ 1B
0,690
73/2A
0.440
55/2A
73/2B
0.330 55/2B
1.060
0.320
73/2C
55/2C
0.7000
73/2D
0.140 55/2D
0.070
74/1B
0,280
1.210
55/3A
74/ 2A 0.190
0.590
55/3B
74/2B2 0.220 56/1
1.030
74/2C
0.470
0,940
56/2
76/1
1.140 57
1.670
77/1
0.140
1.330
58
0.210
77/2
1,070
59/1
77/3
(0.160
1.070
59/3
77/4
0.110 59/2A
1.070
0.050
77/5A
59/2B
0.320
77/5B
0,040 59/2C
0,230
0.050
77/5C
0.270
59/2D
0.110
77/6A1
0,120
59/2E
0.140
77/6A2
59/2F
0.020
77/6BI 0.120
0.100
59/2G
%
1,450
3,225
60
97/1
1.280
1.050
61 / 1A2A1
2/2
0.440
Hanumanthai
(0,430
61 / 1A2A2
2/ 1A
0.470
1.200
61/ 1B2B
2/1B1
1.090
2.260
62/1
0.060
2/3 A
(0.580
62/2A
0.110
2/3B
62/2B
0,070
0.250
2/3C
0.270
62/2C1
3
2.850
0.320
62/2C2
4
0.730 62/2D
0.620
5
0.830
0.070
63/2 4780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
2
3
6
0.580 Hanumanthai ( Contd.)
7/1
0,820
7/2
1.410
8/1
0.220
8/2
0,170
0.060
8/3A
0.020
8/3B
8/3C
0.050
0.040
8/3D
8/3E
0.070
8/3F
0.480
0.200
8/3G
8/3H
0.050
9
(0,440
10
1.050
0.200
(0,280
11/2
11/3
(0,740
11/4
0.320
12
1.100
13
0.620
14
1.200
0.650
15/1
0.620
15/2
15/3
0,640
16
0.610
17/1
0.310
17/2
0,310
17/3
0.620
1.280
18/1
18/2A 0.330
18/2B
0.320
19/1
0.310
0.350
19/2
20/1
0.280
20/5
0.370
20/6
0.320
20/7
0.730
20/2A 0.320
0.730
20/2B
20/3A
0,300
20/3B
0,310
0.150
20/4A
20/4B
0.170
20/4C
0,150
20/4D
0,150
20/8A 0,330
20/8B
0.380
26/1
0.360
26/2
0,350
27
0.750
28
0.610
29/1
0.280
29/2
0.310
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
30/2
0.580 Hanumanthai ( Contd.)
30/1A 0.380
0.270
30/1B
0.020
30/ 1C
0.020
30/1D
0,250
30/ 1E
0.270
30/1F
0.650
31
32
0.610
33/1
0.300
33/2
0.310
34/1A 0.350
34/ 1B 0.150
34/1C 0.190
34/2A 0.320
0.270
34/2B
0.310
35/1
0.310
35/2
36
0.680
0.650
37/2
37/1A
0.300
0.310
37/1B
38/1A 0.220
0.230
38/ 1B
38/ 1C
0.220
38/2A 0.320
38/2B
0.250
38/2C
0.100
38/2D
0.090
38 /2E
0.100
38/2F
0,270
39
0,700
(0.440
40/1
40/2
(0.470
41 / 1A 0.480
41/ LB
0.150
41/ 2A 0.350
41/2B
0,280
0.310
41/3 A
41/3B
0.310
59/1
0.410
59/2
0.410
59/3
1.100
0.570
60/3
60/4
0.400
0,150
60/1A
60/ 1B
0.250
0.490
60/2A
0.270
60/2B1
60/2B2 0.310
61
1.640
62
0.490
223/1
0,470
223/2
0,480 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4781
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
1
2
3
1
223/3
0.670
Hanumanthai ( Contd .)
Paranur-( Contd. )
223/4
0.300
223/6
0.540
223/7
0.360
0.210
225/1
225/2
0.220
0.230
225/3
226/1 .
0.280
226/2
0.480
226/3
0.940
0.280
226/7
226/8
0.650
Paranur
9/1A
0.280
9/ 1B
1.110
9/2A
0.050
9/2B
0.060
0.200
11/ 1A1
11/1A2 0.100
11/1B
0.320
11 /2A1 0.020
11/2A2 0.280
0.070
11/2B1
1/2B2
0.175
11/3A 0.330
11/3B
0.170
11/3C 0.020
13/1
0.600
13/2
0.620
0.590
14
0.285
15/1
15/2
0.285
15/3
0.460
16/1
0.090
16/2
0.050
16/3
0.130
16/4
0.200
0.220
16/5
16/6
0.220
16/7
0.190
17/ 1A1 0.110
0.100
17/1A2
17/1B
0.020
0.070
17/2A
17/2B 0.100
17/2C
0.110
18
0.330
19/1
0.720
19/5
0.210
0.010
19/2A
19/2B
0.020
19/2C
0.060
0.010
19/3A
19/3B 0.020
0.090
19/3C
2
3
0.070
19/4A
0.060
19/4B
20/1
0.590
20/2
0.530
0.230
20/3A
0.350
20/3B
0.570
21/1
0.620
21/2
0.360
22/1
0.350
22/3
0.360
23/1
0.390
0.175
23/2
0.175
23/3
23/4
0.380
0.370
24/1
0.370
24/2
0.400
24/3
25/1
0.690
25/2
0.400
25/3
0.370
0.075
26/ 1A
0.090
25/ 1B
26/1C
0.090
26/1D
0.090
26/2A 0.075
0.070
26/2B
26/2C
0.090
0.070
26/2D
27/1
0.620
0.280
27/2
0.310
27/4
27/5
0.280
27/3A 0.190
0.100
27/3B
27/3C 0.160
0.140
27/3D
28/1
0.200
0.090
28/4
0.160
28/2A
0.140
28/2B
0.230
28/3A
0.020
28/3B
0.040
28/5A
0.040
28/5B
0.110
29
0.110
30/1
30/2
0.140
0.020
30/3
0.040
30/4
0.040
30/5
30/6
0.170
31
0.070
33
0.560 4782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927 1
2
3
1
34/1
0.640
Paranur-( Contd. )
[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 2
3
78A/2A 0.040
Paranur-( Contd. )
34/2
0.650
34/3
0.620
35/1
0.210
0.320
35/2
35/3.-
0,260
36/1
1.120 .
36/2
0,960
37
0.380
38
2.360
39/1
0.250
39/2
0.260
39/3
0,600
40
0.610
41
1.610
42
0,070
43/1
0,620
43/2
1.150
44/1
0.350
44/2
0.560
44/3
0,570
45/1
0.480
0.580
45/2
46/1A 0.490
46/1B2 0.940
47/1
0.630
47/2
0.830
48
0.150
49/2
0,270
0.720
49/3
49/ 1A
0.110
0.070
49/ 1B
49/1C
0.050
50
0.530
51/1
0,300
0,260
51/2
52/1
0.600
0.600
52/2
52/3
0.555
53/1
0.590
53/2
0.555
0.650
54
55
0.610
56
0.720
76B/ 1A 0.070
76B/ 1B 0.070
76B/1C 0.070
76B/1D 0.070
76B/ 1E 0,300
76B/ 1F 0.070
76B/1G 0.070
77
0.440
78A/3
0.410
78A/21 0,030
0.080
78A/2B
0.040
78A/2C
78A/2D 0.010
78A/2E 0.010
0.040
78A/2F
0.025
78A/2G1
78A/2G2 0.075
0.185
78A/2H1
78A/2H2 0.010
78A/2J 0.050
0.020
78A/2K
0.190
78A/2L
78A/2M 0.160
78A/ 2N 0.150
78A/20 0.150
0.260
78A/2P
0.310
78A/2Q
0.040
78A2R
78A/2S 0.040
78A/ 2T 0.140
78A/2U 0.040
0.060
78A/2V
78A/2W 0.100
78A/41 0.070
78A/4A 0.040
0.010
78A/4B1
0.040
78A/4B2
78A/4C 0.100
78A/4D 0.110
78A/4E 0.090
78A/4F 0,090
78A/4G 0.150
78A/4H 0.190
78A/4J 0.060
78A/4K 0.060
78A/4L 0.060
0.090
78A/4M
78A/4N 0,150
0.020
79B/ 1A
0.050
79B/ 1B
79B/1C 0.020
79B/ 1D 0.020
79B/ 1E 0.050
0.050
79B/ 1F
0.070
79B/1G
79B/ 1H 0,020
0.060
80/3
0.040
80/4
0.345
80/7
0.355
80/8
80/10
0.050
80/12
0.100
0.230
80/13 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927 1
2
1
3
80/14
1.185
Paranur-(Contd. )
Paranur-( Contd. )
0,230
80/16
80/ 15A 0.070
80/15B 0.070
80/15C 0.170
80/ 1A
0.050
80/1B
0.020
80/2A 0.040
80/2B
0.025
80/5A 0.040
80/5B
0.040
80/6A1 0.070
80/6A2 0.100
0.190
80/6B
80/9A
0.190
0.160
80/9B
81
0.350
0.570
82/1
0.290
82/2
82/3
0.290
83/2
0.370
83/ 1A1 0.170
83/1A2 0.060
83/1B
0.090
83/ 1C
0.090
84/2
0.050
84/1A 0.040
84/ 1B
0.160
85/1
0.120
85/2
0.150
85/3
0.170
85/4
0.160
86
0.540
87/1
0.490
87/2
0.330
87/3
0,240
88/1
0.870
88/2
0.360
88/3A 0,210
88/3B
0,370
89/2
0.570.
89/ 1A 0345
89/1B
0,200
90/1
0.510
90/2
0.540
0.570
91/1
91/2
0,560
92/1
0,540
92/2
0,590
0.590
93
94
0,050
95
0,570
96/1
0,520
96/2
0.810
4783 2
3
97/1
0.570
97/2
0.560
97/3
0.540
98.
1.950
0.360
99/1
99/2
0.430
100/1
0.440
0,280
100/2
1.240
101/1
101/2A 0.100
101/2B 0.100
101/2C 0.220
102/1
0.280
102/2
0.070
102/3
0.320
102/5
0.140
102/6
0.290
102/7
0.140
102/4A 0.050
102/4B 0.110
102/4C 0.190
102/4D 0.140
102/4E 0.150
103/1
0.345
1.590
103/4
103/2A 0.230
103/2B 0.280
103/2C 0.320
0.100
103/3A
103/3B 0.090
103/3C 0.090
103/3D 0.100
0.070
103/3E
103/3F 0.100
103/5A 0.140.
103/5B 0.050
103/5C 0.400
103/5D 0.300
103/5E 0.040
104/1
1.530
104/2A 0.140
104/2B
0.280
104/2C1 0.120
0.160
104/2C2
105/1
0.560
105/2A 0.210
105/2B 0.040
0.025
105/2C
0.025
105/2D
0.140
106
107/1 0.190
0.190
107/2
107/4
0.510
107/3A1 0.160 4784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927 1
2
3
1
107/3A2 0.160
Paranur ( Contd. )
Paranur-( Contd . )
107/3A3 0.170
107/3B 0.480
108
0.640
109/1A1 0.020
109/1A2 0.320
109/1B 0.020
109/1C 0.350
109/2A 0.050
109/2B 0.350
109/ 2C 0.280
110/1
0.580
0.070
110/2A
110/2B 0.190
110/2C 0,150
111
0.120
112/1
0.310
112/2 0,210
112/3
0,070
112/4
0,060
112/5
0.190
112/6
0.050
0.190
112/7
113/1
0.580
113/2
0.480
0.400
114/1
114/2
0.410
115
0,060
116/1
0.460
116/2
0.930
116/3
0.510
117/1
0.455
117/2
0.560
118
0.790
119/2
0.135
0.150
119/3
119/ 1A. 0.150
119/1B 0.150
120/1
0.930
120/2
0.560
120/3
0.440
121/1
0.410
121/2
0.320
121/3A 0.050
121/3B 0.400
122/1
0.380
122/2
0.380
123
0,260
124/1
0.780
124/2
0,660
0.560
125/1
125/2A 0.540
125/2B 0.540
126/1
0,490
[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
126/2
0.120
0.070
126/3A
126/3B 0.520
127/1
0.570
0,580
127/2
0.560
128/1
0.570
128/2
129/1
0.590
0.520
129/2
130/1
0.590
0.530
130/2
0,520
131
132/1
1.200
0.580
132/2
132/3
0.140
133/1
0.320
133/2
0.200
0,580
133/3
133/4 0.300
0.570
134/2
134/1A 0.560
134/1B 0.530
0,150
142/ 1A
142/ 1B 0.170
142/2A1 0.020
142/2A2 0/020
142/2B 0.060
142/ 3A1 0.020
142/3A2 0,020
142/3B1 0.010
142/3B2 0.060
143
1.160
144/1
0.330
144/2
0.280
144/3
0.300
0.260
144/4
145/1
0.570
145/2A 0.190
145/2B 0.190
145/2C 0.210
0.380
147/1
147/2
0.590
147/3
0.610
148/1
0.020
148/2
0,060
149
1.200
0.200
150/1
150/2
0.440
0.220
150/3
151/1
0.420
0.100
151/2
151/3
0.070
151/4
0.120
151/5
0,420 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4785
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
3
1
2
1
151/6
0.380
Paranur(Contd. ) Paranur-(Contd .)
151/8 0.250
151/9 0.100
151/10 0.100
151/ΠΑ 0.530
151/7B 0.250
152/1
0.610
0.580
152/2
153
0.670
0,560
154/1
0.630
154/2
0.360
154/3
154/4
0:260
155/1
0.530
155/2 0.580
156
0.040
0.820
157/1
0.060
157/2
0.860
157/3
158
0.555
159
0.540
160
1.210
0.270
161/1
0.410
161/2
0.270
161/3
161/4 0.420
161/5
0.380
0.210
162
163
0.090
0.670
164
165
0.050
166
0.930
167/ 1,2B 0.570
167/2A1 0,010
167/2A2 0.010
167/2A3 0.010
0,200
168/ 1A
168/ 1B 0.200
168/1C 0.140
0.035
168/2A
168/2B 0.070
168/2C 0,070
0.110
168/2D
168/3A 0.120
0.090
168/3B
168/3C 0,090
169
(0.480
0,300
170/1
0,320
170/2
171
0.410
172
0,350
0.360
173/1
173/2
0.690
173/3
0.665
1358 GI /2005-5
2
3
173/5
0.120
173/4A 0.120
173/4B 0.120
0.240
173/4C
1.090
174/1
0.260
174/2
0.200
174/3
0.140
174/4
0.310
174/5
0.020
174/6
0.150
175
176/1
0.190
0.200
176/2
0.730
176/3
178/1
0.350
0.340
178/3
178/2A 0.280
178/2B 0.010
178/2C 0.200
0.270
178/2D
0.975
184
0.280
189/1
0.270
189/2
0.140
190
0.260
191
192/1
0.180
192/2 0.120
0.230
193
0.100
194/1
0,100
194/2
0.320
194/3
0.300
194/4
194/5 0.160
0.150
194/6
1.750
195/1
0.040
195/2
0.480
196
0.800
197
0.500
198
1.610
202/1
0.100
202/2
0,360
203/1
0,330
203/2
0.300
203/3
0.320
204/1
0.220
204/2
0.210
204/3
0.250
204/4
0.240
204/5
0.555
205
1.220
206/1
1.210
206/2
1.185
206/3
0.455
207/1 4786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
1
2
3 207/2 0.410
4A/3D Paranur( Contd. )
0.120
Rajakulipettai-( Contd. )
221
0,080
4A/4A 0.050 223/1
0.570
4A/4B 0.170 223/2
0,700
0,310
4A/4C 225/1
0.250
5/2
0.190 225/2
0.790
5/3
0.260 225/3
0.480
5/5
0.310 225/4
0.110
5/6
0.360 226
0.900
5/8
0,300 227
0.260
0.020
5/1A 228/1
0,120
0.040
5/1B
228/2
0.040
5/1C
0.020 228/3 0.040
0.360
5/1D
0.110
228/4
5/ 1E
0.060 228/5
0.330
5/4A
0.090 228/6
0.120
5/4B
0.010
0,200
228/7
0.040
5/4C
228/8
0,220
5/4D
0.040
0.390
230
5/4E
0.120 231/3
0.740
5/4F
0.120 231 / 1A 0.110
5/7A
0.190 231/ 1B 0,110
0.360
5/7B
231/ 1C 0.110
6/1
0.300 231/1D 0.100
0.280
6/2A 231/1E 0.100
6/2B1
0.160 231 /2A 0.450
6/2B2
0.170 231/2B 0.270
7/3
0.150 232/1
0.410
0.380
7/1A 232/2A 0,510
7/1B
0.110
0.520
232/2B
7/1C
0.160 233
0.510
7/2A
0.210 249/1
2.170
0.190
7/2B
249/2
0.740
0.160
8/2
249/3
0.765
8/1A
0.300 249/4
0.380
0.220
8/1B
249/5
0.490
8/1C
0.210 249/6
0,260
0.520
9
4A/ 1A 0.100
1.070 Rajakulipettai
10/1
4A/ 1B 0.050
0,200
10/2
4A/ 1C
0.100
0.990
10/3
4A/ 1D1 0.040
0.110
10/4
4A/ 1D2 0.120
0,590 4A/ 1D3 0,380
0.280
11/2
4A/ 1E 0.120
11/3
0.490 4A/ 1F 0.120
12/1
0.460
0.070
4A/1G
0.420
12/2
4A/ 1H
0.090
0.250
12/3
4A/ 11
12/4
0.830
0.440
4A/1J
0,400
3.890
12/5
4A/ 1K 0.400
0.440
30/1
4A/2A 3.310
30/2
1.720 4A/3A 0,100
0,060
30/3
4A/3B 0.120
30/4
0.280 4A/3C 0.160
0.140
32/5 4787 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
1
2
3 32/6
0,010
10
0.990 Rajakulipettai-(Contd.)
Thenmelpakkam(Contd.)
32/ 1A 0.050
11
1.250 32/1B
0,300
0.050
12/ 1A
32/1C
0,300
0,070
12/1B
0.300
32/2A
12/ 1C
0.770
0.300
32/2B
12/ 1D
0.630
0.070
32/3A
12/ 1E
0.020 32/3B1 0.110
12/ 1F
0.020 32/3B2 0.110
12/1G
0.230 32/4A 0.060
12/2A 0.540 32/4B1 0.060
12/2B
0.020 32/4B2 0.060
12/2C
0,530 1/1
0.780
12/3A 0.310 Thenmelpakkam
0.490
1/2
12/3B
0.010 1/3
0.580-
13.
1.150 2/2
0.070
14/1
0.430 2/3
0.400
14/2
0,420
0.350
2/ 1A
15/2
0.640 2/1B
0,230
0.350
15/3
2/1C1 0.620
15/1A 0,140
0.270
2/1C2
0.580
15/1B
0.270
2/1C3
16
2.360
Veerapuram
0.270
2/1C4
17
2.170 3/2
0.040
18/1A1 1.010
0,280
3/ 1A
18/1A2 0.020
0.250
3/1B1
18/1B1 0.440 3/1B2 0,310
0,020
18/1B2
0.310
31B3
0.580
18/1B3
0.070
3/1C
18/1B4 0.200 3/1D
0.110
2.000
19/1
4/1
1.090
2.480
20/1
4/4
0.010
20/2A 0.420 4/2A
0.360
0.310
20/2B1
0.070
4/2B
0.400
20/2B2
4/2C
0.020
20/2B3 0.200 4/2D
0.150
20/2C
1.200 4/3A
0.060
0.060
22/2A
0.270
4/3B
0,300
22/2B
0.270
4/3C1
0.400
22/2C
4/3C2 0.020
22/2D
0.350
0.350
5/1
24/3
1.930
0.420
5/2
0.360
24/2B1
6/1
0,910
100/3
1.250
0.020
6/2
0.160
100/5
7/1
0.680
100/6
0,310 7/2
0.750
0.010
100/1A
8
0.680
1.730
100/1B
9/1
0.148
0.690
100/1C
0.440
9/3
100 /2A 1.050
0.490
0.350
9/2A
100/2B
9/2B1
0.490
0.210
100/4A
0,220
0.740 9/2B2
100/4B
0.250
9/2C
0.380
100/7A
0.250
100/7B 0.420 9/2D 4788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
0.750
100/8A
Veerapuram ( Contd.)
100/8B 0.490
100/8C 1.510
106/1
0.220
0,200
106/2
0,320
106/3
106/5 0.620
106/4A 0.160
106/4B 0.070
106/4C 0.070
106/6A 0,640
का.आ. 1766.-सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 52) की धारा 8 ( ख ) , भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग, नईदिल्लीके परिपत्र सं. 68/ 2003 - सी. शु. के साथ पठित, के अधीन मुझमें प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं , जयेन्द्रनाथ , सीमा शुल्क आयुक्त, तिरुच्चिराप्पल्लि इसके द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र सा. का. नि. 212( ई ) दिनांक 01-04-2005 में अधिसूचित सर्वे नंबर को समाविष्ट करने वाले तथा इस अधिसूचना के संलग्नक में उल्लिखित, महिंद्रा नगर, तालुक चेंगलपट्टु, जिला कांचीपुरम , तमिलनाडु राज्य में परिधान एवं फैशन उपांगों के वि. आ. सं. को, आयातित्त माल के उतारण तथा निर्यात माल के लदान के सीमित प्रयोजनार्थ, सीमा- शुल्क क्षेत्र घोषित करता हूँ।
106/6B 0,280
106/6C 0.110
[फा. सी.सं. VIII/48/13/2005- सी शु नीति ] 106/7A 0.140
जयेन्द्रनाथ , आयुक्त
0,260
106/7B
0.330
106/8A
अनुबन्ध
0.320
106/8B1
परिधान एवं फैशन-वि आ अं संसाधन क्षेत्र
0.310
106/8B2
जिला: कांचीपुरम तालुक : चेंगलप्टु 107
0.840
108/1
0.840
गांव का नाम
सर्वेसं.
0.800
108/2
2,900
117/1
एकडों में विस्तार 3
1
2
118/1
0.460
260/5
5,000
अंजूर
0.260
118/2
(0,220
118/3
260/3E
0.610 118/5
(0,350
260/3F
0.150 118/7
0.060
260/3G
0.160
0.020
118/4A
260/3H
0.150
0.140
118/4B
0.050
118/4C
260/4B1
0.210 11A 0.330
0.230
260/4B2
1186B 0.060
260/4B3
0.230 TOTAL AREA OF TECHNO SEZ
650.208
260/4B4
0.020
260/4B5
0,200 तिरुच्चि, 29 अप्रैल, 2005
260/4B6
0.210
260/4B7
0.210 सं. 03/2005 ( गै. टै. )
0.070
260/4B8
(सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम की धारा 8 ( ख ) के अधीन जारी )
0.270
260/6A
260/6B
0.320
260/6C
0.120
260/6D
0.110 विषय: तमिलनाडु राज्य के जिला कांचीपुरम , तालुक चेंगलपट्टु, महिंद्रा नगर में परिधान एवं फैशन के लिए वि आ सं को आयातित माल के उतारण तथा निर्यातित माल के लदान के प्रयोजनार्थ सीमा- शुल्क क्षेत्र की सीमाओं की घोषणा ।
260/6E
0.020
260/ 6F
0.170
0,300
260/6G
260/6H
0.310 संदर्भ: ( i ) सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम की धारा 76 ( क ) के अधीन वि आ अंचल को अधिसूचित करने वाली राजस्व विभाग की अधिसूचना सं 28/ 2005- सी. शु. (गै ) दिनांक 1-4-20051
260/61
1 0.310
260/6J
0.010
260/6M
0.250 ( ii ) राजस्व विभाग परिपत्र सं. 68/ 2003-सी. शु. दिनांक 30-7-2003 का पैरा 151
260/6N
0,320 [भाम II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1
2
3
260/6T
0.170 अंजूर-( जारी )
4789
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
1
3
0.260
274/3E
अंजूर ( जारी )
261/1A1
0.040
261/ 1A2
0.060
0,060
261/1A3
261/1A4
0.100
0.060
261/1A5
261/1A6
0,060
0.060
261/1A7
261/2A1
0.120
261/2A2
0.120
0.120
261 /2A3
261/2A4
0,120
261/2A5
0.050
0.050
261/2A6
0.050
261/2A7
0.120
261 /2A8
270/1
2.000
270/2
1.330
270/3
1.000
270/4
1,000
271 / 1A
0.140
271/1B
0.140
271/ 1C
0.140
0.120
271/ 1D
271/ 1E
0.060
271/ 1F
0.050
271/1G
0.050
271 /1H
0.050
0.050
271/11
271/1J
0.050
271/1K
0.050
271/ 1L
0.040
271/ 1M
0.070
0.570
271/ 1N
0,050
271 /2A
271/2B
0,050
0,050
271/2C
271/2D
0.050
271/2E
0.070
271/2F
0.140
272
0.310
273/2
0.170
0.200
273/1A
273/1B
0.150
273/1C
0.250
274/6
0.490
274/1A
0.060
274/1B
0.230
274/2A
0.190
274/2B
0.170
274/3A
0,280
0.050
274/3B
274/3C
0.110
274/3D
0.110
274/4A
0.150
274/4B
0.150
0.320
274/5A
274/5B
0.020
274 /ΠΑ
0,220
274/7B
0.120
275/ 1A
2.100
275/1B
0.250
0.120
275/2A
275/2B1
0.090
275/2B2
0.090
0.090
275/2B3
275/2B4
0.270
275/2B5
0.100
275/286
0.060
275/287
0.060
275/288
0.060
0.070
275/2C
0,050
275/2D
0.050
275/2E
275/2F
0.040
0.050
275/2G
275/3A
0.400
275/3B
0.410
276/1
0.100
276/2
0.090
276/3
0.090
276/4
0.270
277
4.960
0.230
278/1
0.250
278/2
278/3
0.270
279/4
0.110
0.080
281/4
0.240
281/6
0.240
283/1
0.210
283/2
284/6
0,090
0.180
284/7
0.130
284/8
284/9
0.120
0,050
284/10
0.050
284/11
284/12
0.010
0.720
288
1.010
289
1.050
290
0.490
291/2
0.060
291 / 1A
0.370
291/ 1B
0.250
291/ 1C
0.630
291/ 1D
292/1
0.110 4790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
3
292/2
0.230 अंजूर-( जारी )
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
3
2
1
68/1A
1.490 तेनमेलपाक्कम(जारी )
293/1
0.380
293/2
0.380
0.170
294/ 1A1
294/1A2
0.020
0.100
294/1A3
294/1B
0.300
294/2A
0.330
294/2B
0.160
294/2C
0.160
295/ 1A
0.480
295/ 1B
0.310
295/2A
0.100
295/2B
0.090
296/1
0.350
296/2
0.220
296/3
0.090
296/4
0.050
297/ 1A1
0.360
0.300
297/ 1A2A
297/ 1A2B 0.050
297/ 1B
0.350
297/2A
0.720
297/2B
0.260
297/2C
0.020
297/2D
0.320
298/2
0.280
0.220
298/ 1A
298/ 1B1
0.200
0.200
298/ 1B2
299
0.260
300/2
0.610
0.160
300/ 1A
300/1B
0.140
300/IC
0.060
301 / 1A1
0.110
301/ 1A2
0.020
0.220
301/ IB
301/ IC
0.160
301/2A
0.040
0.640
301/2B
301 /2C
0.590
302/1A
0.280
0.090
303/2
0.320
306
61/3
0.140 तेनमेलपाक्कम
0.610
63
64/2
0.310
64/1A
0.420
64/ 1B
0.620
65
0.090
1.570
66
67
0.660
1.730
68/2
0.260
68/ 1B
69
0.120
70
6.450
71
1.060
72/1
0.350
0.300
72/2
73
1.330
74/1
0.630
74/2
0.350
0.190
75/1
75/2
0.420
76/1
0.130
76/2
0.300
77/1
0.170
0.050
77 /2A
77/2B
0.230
77 /2C
0.010
77/3A
0.020
1.000
77/3B
83/2B
0.190
70.570 परिधान वि.आ.अं. का कुल क्षेत्र
Trichy, the 29th April , 2005
No. 03/2005 (Ν.Τ. )
(Issued under Section 8 ( b) of the Customs Act) Sub : Declaration of SEZ for Apparel and Fashsion at Mahindra City , Taluk Chengalpattu , District Kanchepuram in the State of Tamilnadu as a limits of Customs Area for the purpose of unloading of imported goods and loading of exports goods .
Ref: (i) Department of Revenue Notification No. 28 /2005- Cus(NT)dated 01-04-2005 notifying the SEZ under Section 76 A of Customs Act .
(ii ) Para 15 of Department of Revenue Circular No. 68/2003 - Customs dated 30-07-2003
S.O. 1766.- In exercise of the powers conferred on me under Section 8 ( b) of the Customs Act (52 of 1962 ) readwith Circular No. 68/2003 -Customs , of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I Jayendranath , Commissioner of Customs , Tiruchirapalli hereby declare the SEZ for Apparel and Fashion Accessories at Mahindra City , Taluk Chengalpattu , District Kanchepuram in the State of Tamilnadu comprising of survey numbers as notified in the Gazette of India , G.S.R. 212( E) dated 01-04-2005 and mentioned in the Annexure to this notification as Customs Area for the limited purpose of unloading of imported goodsand loading export goods .
[ F. C. No. VIII/48/13/2005-Cus . Pol . ]
JAYENDRANATH , Commissioner [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
ANNEXURE
Annexure toNotification 03/2005 (Ν.Τ.) District: Kancheepuram Taluk: Chengalpattu Name oftheVillage Survey Number
Extent in Acres
2
3 1
260/5
5.000 Anjur
260/3E
0.610
260/3F
0.150
0.160
260/3G
260/3H
0.150
260/4B1
0.210
260/4B2
0.230
260/4B3
0,230
260/484
0.020
260/4B5
0.200
260/4B6
0,210
0.210
260/487
0.070
260/4B8
0.270
260/6A
0.320
260/6B
0.120
260/6C
260/6D
0.110
260/6E
0.020
260/6F
0.170
260/6G
0.300
260/6H
0.310
260/61
0.310
260/6J
0.010.
260/6M
0.250
0.320
260/6N
260/6T
0.170
261/ 1A1
0.040
0.060
261/1A2
0.060
261/1A3
0.100
261/1A4
261/1A5
0,060
261/1A6
0.060
0.060
261/ 1A7
0.120
261/2A1
261/2A2
0.120
261/2A3
0.120
261/2A4
0.120
261/2A5
0.050
0.050
261/2A6
0,050
261/2A7
261/2A8
0.120
2.000
270/1
270/2
1.330
270/3
1.000
270/4
1.000
0.140
271 /1A
271/1B
0.140
271/1C
0.140
271/1D
0.120
4791
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927.
1
2
3
271/1E
0,060 Anjur-(Contd.)
271/1F
0.050
271/1G
-0.050
271/ 1H
0.050
271/11
0,050
271/1J
0.050
0.050
271/ 1K
271/ IL
0.040
271/ 1M
0.070
271/ 1N
0.570
271 /2A
0,050
271/2B
0.050
271/2C
0.050
0.050
271/2D
0,070
271/2E
271/2F
0.140
272
0.310
273/2
0.170
0.200
273/1A
273/1B
0.150
273/1C
0.250
274/6
0.490
0.060
274/1A
274/1B
0.230
274/2A
0.190
0.170
274/2B
0.280
274/3A
0.050
274/3B
0.110
274/3C
0.110
274/3D
0.260
274/3E
0.150
274/4A
274/4B
0.150
0.320
274/5A
274/5B
0.020
0.220
274/7A
274/7B
0.120
275/1A
2.100
0.250
275/1B
275/2A
0.120
293/2
0,380
294/1A1
0.170
294/1A2
0.020
294/1A3
0.100
0.300
294/1B
294/2A
0.330
294/2B
0,160
0.160
294/2C
295/1A
0.480
295/1B
0.310
295/2A
0.100
295/2B
0.090
296/1
0.350
296/2
0.220
296/3
0.090
296/4
0.050
297/1A1
0.360 4792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1
2
3
1
2
3 297/ 1A2A 0.300
1.000 Anjur-(Contd .)
Thenmelpakkam-(Contd . ) 77/3B
297/ 1A2B 0.050
83/2B
0.190
0.350
297/ 1B
70.570
TOTAL AREA OF APPAREL SEZ
0.720
297 /2A
297/2B
0.260
297/2C
0.020
297/2D
0.320
तिरुच्चि, 29 अप्रैल , 2005 सं. 04/2005 ( गै.है. )
298/2
0.280
(सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम की धारा 8 ( ख ) के अधीन जारी ) .
298/ 1A
0.220
298/ 1B1
0.200
298/ 1B2
0.200
299
0.260
300/2
0.610
विषय: तमिलनाडु राज्य के जिला कांचीपुरम, तालुक चेंगलपट्ट, महिंद्रा नगर में ऑटो एनसिलरी के लिए वि आ सं को आयातित माल के उतारण तथा निर्यातित माल के लदान के प्रयोजनार्थ सीमा शुल्क क्षेत्र की सीमाओं की घोषणा । 300/1A
0.160
0.140
300/ 1B
300/1C
0.060
301/ 1A1
0.110
301/1A2
0.020
संदर्भ: ( i ) सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम की धारा 76 ' क ' के अधीन वि आ अंचल को अधिसूचित करने वाली राजस्व विभाग की अधिसूचना सं 29/2005- सी. शु. ( गै ) दिनांक 1-4-2005, जोविआ अं को विनिर्दिष्ट करती है ।
0.220
301/ 1B
301 / 1C
0.160
0.040
301 /2A
( ii ) राजस्व विभाग परिपत्र सं. 68/2003-सी . शु. दिनांक 30-7-2003 का पैरा 15.
301/2B
0.640
301/2C
0.590
302/ 1A
0.280
303/2
0.090
306
0.320
61/3
0.140
Thenmelpakkam
63
0.610
64/2
0.310
64/1A
0.420
0.620
64/1B
65
0.090
66
1.570
67
0.660
68/2
1.730
का.आ. 1767.- सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 52) की धारा 8 ( ख ) , भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली के परिपत्र सं. 68/2003- सी. शु. के साथ पठित; के अधीन मुझमें प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं , जयेन्द्रनाथ, सीमा शुल्क आयुक्त, तिरुच्चिराप्पल्लि इसके द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र सं. सा.का.नि. 213 ( अ ) दिनांक 01-04-2005 में अधिसूचित सर्वे नंबर को समाविष्ट करने वाले तथा इस अधिसूचना के संलग्नक में उल्लिखित, महिंद्रा नगर , तालुक चेंगलपट्टु, जिला कांचीपुरम, तमिलनाडु राज्य में ऑटो एनसिलरी के वि आ सं . को , आयातित माल के उतारण तथा निर्यात माल के लदान के सीमित प्रयोजनार्थ, सीमा- शुल्क क्षेत्र घोषित करता हूँ ।
68/1A
1.490
68/1B
0.260
[फा. सी. सं. VIII/48/13/2005-सी. शु.नीति ] जयेन्द्रनाथ , आयुक्त 69
0.120
70
6.450
अनुबन्ध
71
1.060
ऑटो एनसिलरी-वि आ अं संसाधन क्षेत्र 72/1
0.350
72/2
0.300
जिला : कांचीपुरम
तालुक : चेंगलपट्टु 73
1.330
सर्वे सं.
गांव का नाम
74/1
0.630
एकड़ोंमें विस्तार
0.350
74/2
75/4
219
0.670
0.190
अंजूर
0.280 75/2
0.420
220/ 1A1
76/1
220/1A2
0.360
0.130
76/2
220/1B
0.400
0.300
220/1C
77/1
0.380
0.170
0.260
0.050
220/ 1D
77 /2A
220/ 1E
0.300 77/2B
0.230
220/2A
0.310 77 /2C
0.010
220/2B
0.280
0.020
77/3A [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3
279/1
0.370
4793
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
3
0.150
303/3A
अंजूर (जारी)
अंजूर-(जारी )
0.150
279/2
279/3.
0.150
279/4
0.670
281/1
0.400
0,350
281/2
281/3
0.400
281/4
0.500
281/5
0.060
281/6
0.120
282/1
0,700
282/2
0.780
283/1.
0.140
283/2
0,140
284/1
0.370
0.260
284/2
284/3
0.200
0.220
284/4
284/5.
0,260
284/6
0.020
284/7
0.050
284/8
0.070
0.200
284/9
284/10
0.170
284/11
0.310
284/12
0.200
285
0.570
286/2
0.440
0.400
286/1A1
286/ 1A2
0.460
286/1A3A 0.190
0.250
286/1A3B
0.630
286/1B
286/1C1
0,300
286/1C2
0.330
0.320
286/3A
286/3B
0.990
287
0,510
1.240
288-
289
0.220
290
0.150
301/1B
0.160
0.220
301/1C
302/ 1A
0.230
302/1B
0.280
302/1C
0.020
302/ 1D
0.220
302/2A
0140
302/2B1
0.140
302/2B2
0.140
302/283
0.150
303/1
0.510
0.560.
303/2
0.330
303/4
1358 G1/2005-6
0,190
303/3B1
0.330
303/3B2
0.620
304/1
0.620
304/2
304/3
0.270
304/4
0.620
305
0.700
306
0.290
307/1
0,630
307/2
0.530
307/3
0.050
308/1
0.790
308/2
0.660
309
0.560
310
0.830
311/1
0.100
0,400
311/2
312/1
0.530
312/2A
0.320
312/2B
0.330
313/1
0.640
0.800
313/2A1
313/2A2
0.020
313/2B1
0,200
313/2B2 0.200
314/1
0.370
314/2
0.270
0.040
314/3
315/1
0.590
0.490
315/2
316
1.300
317/1
0.280
0.640
317/2
318/1
0.610
318/2
1.280
0.610
319/1
319/2
0.590.
320/1
0.640
0,530
320/2A
320/2B
0.750
321/2
0.690
321/3
0.580
321/4
0,690
0.640
321/ 1A
0.300
321/ 1B
322
0.650
0.420
323
0.770
324
0,280
325
326
2,070
327
1.030
328
0.220
0.350
329/1 4794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
2
3
329/2
0.400 अंजूर-(जारी )
330/1
0.470
330/2
0.470
331/3
0.610
331/ 1A
0.090
0,050
331/ 1B
331/ 1C
0.020
331/ 1D
0.020
331 / 1E
0.090
331/2A
0.280
331/2B
0.020
0,310
331 /4A
331/4B
0.320
331/4C
0.310
332/1
0.160
0.090
332/2A
332/2B
0.020
332/2C
0.270
332/3A
0.020
332/3B
0.270
333/1
0.880
333/2
0.640
334
1.240
335/1
0.640
335/2
0.650
336/2
0.300
336/3
0.730
336/4
0.360
336/5
0,570
336/1A
0.310
336/1B
0.300
337
0.610
338/1
0.310
338/2
0,300
339/1
0.650
339/2
0,360
339/3
0,280
340/1
0.610
340/2
0.910
340/3
0.430
341/1
0,350
0.020
341/2
341/3
0.120
341/4
0.120
341/5
0.120
342
0.650
343/3
0.210
343/4
0,200
343/5
0.220
343 /1A1
0.110
0.120
343/1A2
343/ 1B
0.380
343/2A
0.400
343/2B
0.160
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
343/6A
0.160 अंजूर-(जारी )
343/6B
0.150
349/1
0.590
349/2
0.680
349/3A
0.330
0.350
349/3B
350/1
0.360
350/2
0.320
0.620
351/1
351/2
0.640
352
0.630
0.620
353/1
353/2
1.240
354
0.650
355/1
0.330
355/2
0.350
356/1
0,310
356/2
0.960
357/1
0.640
0.320
357/2
357/4
0.310
0.170
357/3A
357/3B
0.170
357/3C
0.280
358/1
0.640
358/2
0.630
359/2
0.360
0.720
359/ 1A
359/1B
0,360
360
0.690
361
0.590
362
0.560
363/1
0.370
0,360
363/2
364/2
0.400
364/ 1A1
0.050
364/1A2
0,120
364/1B
0.040
364/ 1C
0.170
0.630
365/1
365/2
0.820
366/3
0,100
366/4
0.170
366/5
0,280
366/7
0.350
366/8
0.280
366/10
0.140
366/12
0,090
366/ 11A
0.140
366/11B
0.010
366/ 1A
0.050
366/1B
0.040
366/2A
0.060
366/2B
0.070 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1
2
3
366/2C
0.070 अंजूर (जारी)
4795
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
1
3
0.570
384/1
अंजूर-(जारी )
-366/6A
0.040
366/6B1
0.070
0.060
366/6B2
366/6B3
0,050
366/6B4
0.050
366/6C
0,020
366/9A
0,100
366/9B
0.020
366/9C
0.010
367/1
0.280
0.570
367/2A
367/2B
0.410
367/2C
0.350
384/3
0.150
384/4
0.320
384/2A1
0.470
384/2A2
0.020
0.490
384/2B
385/2
0.510
385/ 1A
0.280
0.350
385/ 1B
385 /3A
0.020
385/3B
0.320
0,350
385/3C
386
0.160
83/ 1A
0.140 तेनमेलपाक्कम
368
2,170
369
0,580
370/1A
0.020
0.270
370/1B
370/7C
0,370
0,790
370/2A
0.830
370/2B
:
371
0,570
0.270
372
373/1
1.240
373/2
0.280
373/3
0.350
373/4
0.250
374/1
0.300
374/2
0.310
0.630
374/3
375
0.560
376/1A
0.150
376/1B
0.150
0.570
376/2A
376/2B
0.270
377/1
-0.300
0.300
377/3
377/4
0.620
0.320
377/2A
377/2B
0.260
378
0.650
379
0.650
0.190
380/1A
0.570
380/1B
381
0.630
382/1
0.320
382/2
0.010
382/3
0.440
0.200
383/2
0.190
383/3
383/4
0.790
383/ 1A
0,320
383/1B
0.040
0.040
383/1C
383/1D
0.040
0.040
83/2A
83/2B
0.200
84/1B
0.020
84/1D
0.090
85
0.510
119,600 TOTAL AREA OF AUTO ANCILLARY SEZ
Trichy, the 29th April, 2005
No. 04/2005 (Ν.Τ)
(Issued under Section 8(b) of the Customs) Sub: Declaration of SEZ for Auto Ancillary atMahindra City, Taluk Chengalpattu , District Kanchepuram in the State of Tamilnadu as a limits of Customs Area for the purpose of unloading of imported goods and loading of exports goods .
Ref: (i ) Department of Revenue, Notification No. 29/2005- Cust. (NT) dated 01-04-2005 notifying the SEZ under section 76A of Customs Act which specifies the SEZ.
(ii) Para 15 ofDepartment of Revenue , Circular No. 68/2003 -Customs dated 30-07-2003 .
S.O. 1767.-In exercise of the powers conferred on me under section 8 (b) of the Customs Act , 1962 ( 52 of 1962) read with Circular No. 68/2003 - Customs, of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I , Jayendranath , Commissioner of Customs, Tiruchirapalli hereby declare the SEZ for Auto Ancillary at Mahindra City, Taluk Chengalpattu , District Kanchepuram in the State of Tamilnadu comprising of survey numbers as notified in the Gazette of India, G.S.R. 213 (E), dated 01-04-2005 and mentioned in the Annexure tothisnotification as Customs Area for the limited purpose ofunloading of imported goods and loading export goods .
[F. C. No. VIII/48/13/2005-€ us . Pol . ] JAYENDRANATH, Commissioner 4796
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
ANNEXURE
District : Kancheeuram Taluk: Chengalpattu Nameof theVillage Survey Number
Extent in Acres 1
2
3
219
0.670 Anjur
220/ 1A1
0,280
0.360
220/ 1A2
220/ 1B
0.400
0,380
220/1C
220/1D
0,260
220/ 1E
0.300
220 /2A
0.310
0.280
220/2B
279/1
0,370
279/2
0.150
279/3
0,150
0.670
279/4
0.400
281/1
0.350
281/2
0.400
281/3
0,500
281/4
0.060
281/5
0.120
281/6
0,700
282/1
0,780
282/2
283/1
0.140
283/2
0.140
284/1
0.370
284
0,260
0.200
284/3
0.220
284/4
0.260
284/5
0.020
284/6
0.050
284/7
0.070
284/8
0.200
284/9
0.170
284/10
284/11
0.310
284/12
0.200
285
0.570
0.440
286/2
286/1A1
0,400
286/1A2
0.460
0.190
286/ 1A3A
286/1A3B 0.250
286/1B
0.630
286/ 1C1
0.300
286/1C2
0.330
0,320
286/3A
0.990
286/3B
287
0.510
1.240
288
0,220
289
1
2
3
290
0.150 Anjur-(Contd. )
301/1B
0.160
0,220
301/1C
0,230
302/ 1A
0.280
302/ 1B
302/1C
0,020
0.220
302/ 1D
302/2A
0.140
302/2B1
0.140
302/2B2
0.140
0.150
302/2B3
303/1
0.510
0.560
303/2
0.330
303/4
303/3 A
0.150
0.190
303/3B1
0.330
303/3B2
0.620
304/1
0.620
304/2
0.270
304/3
0.620
304/4
0.700
305
0.290
306
0.630
307/1
0.530
307/2
0.050
307/3
0.790
308/1
0.660
308/2
0.560
309
310
0.830
0.100
311/1
0.400
311/2
312/1
0.530
312/2A
0,320
0.330
312/2B
0.640
313/1
313/ 2A1
0.800
0.020
313/2A2
313/2B1
0,200
0.200
313 /2B2
0.370
314/1
0.270
314/2
0.040
314/3
0.590
315/1
0.490
315/2
1,300
316
0.280
317/1
0.640
317/2
0.610
318/1
0.280
318/2
319/1
0.610
0.590
319/2
320/1
0.640
320 /2A
0.530 [ [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4797
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2.
3
320/2B
0.750 Anjur-(Contd. )
0.690
321/2
321/3
0.580
0.690
321/4
321 / 1A
0.640
321/1B
0.300
322
0.650
323
0.420
0,770
324
325
0.280
2.070
326
327
1.030
328
0.220
329/1
0,350
0,400
329/2
0.470
330/1
330/2
0.470
331/3
0.610
331 /1A
0.090
0.050
331/1B
331/1C
0.020
331/ID
0.020
331/1E
0,090
0.280
331 /2A
331/2B
0.020
331/4A
0.310
331/4C
0.320
331/4B
0.320.
332/1
0.160
332/2A
0.090
332/2B
0.020
0.270
332/2C
332/3A
0.020
332/3B
0.270
0.880
333/1
333/2
0.640
334
1.240
335/1
0.640
335/2
0.650
336/2
0.300
336/3
0.730
0.360
336/4
:
0.570
336/5
0,310
336/1A
336/1B
0.300
337
0.610
338/1
0.310
0.300
338/2
339/1
0.650
339/2
0,360
339/3
0.280
0.610
340/1
340/2
0.910
0,430
340/3
1
2
3
341/1
0.350 Anjur-(Contd.)
341/2
0.020
341/3
0.120
341/4
0.120
341/5
0.120
0.650
342
343/3
0.210
343/4
0.200
0.220
343/5
343/1A1
0.110
343/1A2 0.120
343/1B
0.380
343/2A
0.400
343/2B
0.160
343/6A
0.160
343/6B
0.150
349/1
0.590
349/2
0.680
349/3A
0.330
349/3B
0.350
0.360
350/1
350/2
0.320
351/2
0.620
351/2
0.640
0.630
352
353/1
0.620
353/2
1.240
354
0.650
0.330
355/1
0.350
355/2
356/1
0.310
356/2
0.960
357/1
0.640
357/2
0.320
357/4
0.310
357/3A
0.170
357/3B
0.170
357/3C
0.280
358/1
0.640
0.630
358/2
0.360
359/2
0.720
359/ 1A
359/1B
0.360
360
0.690
361
0.590
0.560
362
0,360
363/2
364/1
0.370
364/2
0.400
364/1A1
0.050
364/1A2 0.120
0.040
364/1B
0.170
364/1C
0.630
365/1 4798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
3
365/2
0,820 Anjur-(Contd.)
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)]
2
1
3
379
0.650 Anjur-( Contd. )
366/3
0.100
366/4
0.170
366/5
0,280
366/7
0.350
366/8
0.280
366/10
0.140
366/12
0,090
0.140
366/ 11A
0.010
366/11B
366/1A
0.050
366/1B
0.040
366/2A
0,060
366/2B
0.070
366/2C
0.070
366/6A
0.040
366/6B1
0.070
366/6B2
0.060
0.050
366/6B3
366/6B4
0.050
366/6C
0.020
366/9A
0.100
0.020
366/9B
366/9C
0.010
367/1
0.280
367/2A
0,570
0.410
367/2B
367/2C
0,350
380/ 1A
0.190
380/ 1B
0.570
381
0.630
382/1
0,320
382/2
0.010
382/3
0.440
0,200
383/2
383/3
0.190
0.790
383/4
383/1A
0.320
383/1B
0.040
383/1C
0,040
383/ 1D
0.040
384/1
0.570
384/3
0.150
0.320
384/4
0.470
384/2A1
384/ 2A2
0.020
384/2B
0.490
385/2
0.510
0.280
385/ 1A
385/ 1B
0.350
0.020
385/3A
0.320
385/3B
385/3C
0.350
386
0.160
83/1A
0.140 Thenmelpakkam
368
2.170
369
0.580
0.020
370/1A
0.270
370/ 1B
370/ 1C
0,370
0.790
370 /2A
0.830
370/2B
371
0.570
372
0.270
373/1
1.240
373/2
0.280
0.350
373/3
373/4
0,250
0.300
374/1
0.310
374/2
0.630
374/3
375
0,560
0,150
376/1A
0,150
376/ 1B
0.570
376/2A
0.270
376/2B
377/1
0,300
0.300
377/3
377/4
0.620
0.320
377/2A
0.260
377/2B
378
0.650
83/2A
0.040
0.200
83/2B
84/ 1B
0.020
84/1D
0.090
85
0,510
119.600 TOTAL AREA OF AUTO ANCI- LLARY SEZ
(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )
नई दिल्ली, 19 अप्रैल, 2005
(आय-कर)
का.आ. 1768. आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " अधी प्रशक्ति चेरिटेबल, मेडिकल एजूकेशनल एण्ड कल्चरल ट्रस्ट, मलमारूवतुर, तमिलनाडु" को कर- निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-2007 से 2008-2009 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्-
( i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4799
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
(ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीं किसी भी अवधिके दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;
(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकिकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आय- कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय-कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;
(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी । [अधिसूचना सं. 132/2005/फा. सं. 197/154/2004- आयकर नि. -1 ]
दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi , the 19th April, 2005 (INCOME- TAX)
S.O. 1768.- In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Adhi Prasakthi Charitable , Medical Educational & Cultural Trust , Melmaruvathur , Tamilnadu" for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2006-2007 to 2008-2009 subject to the following conditions , namely :-
(1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;
(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wisethan in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub- section (5) of Section 11 ;
(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;
(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ;
(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives.
[Notification No. 132/2005/F. No. 197/154/2004- ITA-I] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 19 अप्रैल , 2005 (आयकर )
का.आ. 1769.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का . 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( v ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " श्रीमजजगदगुरू माधवाचार्य मूलेमहासम्सथान उत्तरडी मठ, धारवाड " को कर- निर्धारण वर्ष 2002-2003 से 2004-2005 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्-
( i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;
(ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;
( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी, जो किकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा-पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
(iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;
(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्योंवाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी । [अधिसूचना सं. 131/2005/फा. सं. 197/44/2003-
आयकर नि. - 1 ]
दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव 4800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
New Delhi , the 19th April, 2005
(INCOME- TAX)
S.O. 1769.- In exercise of powers conferred by the sub- clause ( v) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Srimajjagadguru Madhwacharya Moolamahasamsthana Uttaradi Math , Dharwad" for the purpose of the said sub- clause for the assessment years 2002-2003 to 2004-2005 subject to the following conditions , namely :-
(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;
( ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub -section (5 ) of Section 11 ;
(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;
(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ;
(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation withsimilar objectives .
[Notification No. 131 /2005/F . No. 197/44/2003 - ITA- 1 ] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल, 2005
(आयकर)
का.आ. 1770.- आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " तिब्तन होम्सफाऊण्डेशन , नई दिल्ली " को निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-2005 से 2006-2007 तक केलिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्-
(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात, फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;
(iii) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए लिएप्रासंगिक नहींहो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;
(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।
[अधिसूचना सं. 133/2005/फा. सं. 197/39/2005- आयकर नि. - 1 ] दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 26th April, 2005 (INCOME-TAX)
S.O. 1770.-In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause (iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Tibetan Homes Foundation , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment year 2004-2005 to 2006-2007 subject to the following conditions, namely:-
(i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established and in a case where more than fifteen per cent of its income is accumulated on or after the Ist day of April , 2002 , the period of the accumulation of the amount exceeding fifteen per cent of its income shall in no case exceed five years ;
(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions réceived and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5) of Section 11 ;
(iii) this notification will not apply inrelation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005 /वैशाख 24 , 1927
the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;
(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income beforethe Income -tax authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income -tax Act , 1961 ;
(v) that in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .
[Notification No. 133/2005/F . No. 197/39/ 2005 - ITA- I ] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 29 अप्रैल, 2005 (आयकर)
का.आ. 1771.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए सूचित किया जाता है किकेन्द्र सरकार आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2002 से दिनांक 31-3-2005 तक के लिए संगठन विवेकानन्द इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ बायोटेक्नॉलॉजी , ( श्री रामकृष्ण आश्रम, निम्पिठ की एक शाखा इकाई ) पो.ऑ. निम्पिठ आश्रम , जिला दक्षिण 24 परगना, पश्चिम बंगाल- 743338 निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन श्रेणी, ' विश्वविद्यालय , कालेज अथवा अन्य संस्था', जो आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान क्रियाकलापों ( तथा न की एक' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ जो मात्र अनुसंधान के लिए मौजूद है ) में लगा हुआ है , के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदित करती है :-
(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों के लिए खातों का अलग रख- रखाव करेगा ।
( ii ) वित्त वर्षों के प्रत्येक वित्त वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए अनुमोदन दिया जा रहा है , अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है, के संबंध में अपनी लेखा परीक्षित आय तथा व्यय खाते की एक क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट) को आय की विवरणी दाखिल करने की देय तिथि को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तिथि से 90 दिनों के भीतर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो , प्रस्तुत करेगा । ( iii) यह संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में उल्लिखित आय तथा व्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाणपत्र भी संलग्न करेगा:-
(क) वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान , जिसके संबंध में दानकर्ता धारा 35 की उपधारा 1 के खण्ड ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं , के लिए संगठन द्वारा प्राप्त धनराशि विनिर्दिष्ट करते हुए ।
1358 GI /2005-7
4801 (ख) यह प्रमाणित करते हुए कि खर्च किया गया व्यय वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए था ।
[अधिसूचना सं. 135/2005/फा. सं. 203/77/2003-आ.क. नि.- II ] निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th April, 2005 (INCOME-TAX)
S.O. 1771. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Vivekananda Institute of bio-technology, ( a branch unit ofSri Ramkrishna Ashram , Nimpith) , P.O. Nimpith Ashram, Distt. South 24-Parganas, West Bengal- 743338 has been approved by the Central Govern-ment for the purposes of clause (ii ) of sub - section (1) of Section 35 ofthe Income Tax Act , 1961 , read with rule 6ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 1-4-2002 to 31-3-2005 under the category, ' university , college or other institution' , partly engaged in research activities (and not as a ' scienctific research association ' existing solely for research) subject to the following conditions:-
(1) The approved organisation shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .
(ii) For each of the financial years for which the approval is being given , the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income and Expenditure account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income Tax Act , 1961 to the Commissioner of Income - tax or Director of Income - tax (Exemptions ) having jurisdiction , on or before the due date offiling of return of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification , whichever expires later.
(iii) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income and Expenditure account referred to in paragraph ( ii ) above , a certificate from the auditor:-
(a) specifying the amount received by the organization for scientific research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause (ii) of sub - section (1) of Section 35.
(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for scientific research.
[Notification No. 135/2005/F . No. 203 /77/2003 - ITA - II ]
NIDHI SINGH , Under Secy.
4802
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
नई दिल्ली, 4 मई , 2005 (आयकर)
(ii) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub- section (5) of Section 11 ;
का.आ. 1772.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " नेशनल फेडरेशन आफ द ब्लाइंड, नई दिल्ली " को कर- निर्धाण वर्ष 2003-2004से 2005-2006 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप -खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है , अर्थात्ः-
(iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;
( i) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;
(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income -tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income - tax Act , 1961 ;
(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation with similar objectives .
[NotificationNo. 138/2005/F . No. 197/40/ 2005 -ITA- I] DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy .
( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;
नई दिल्ली, 4 मई, 2005 (आयकर )
( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहींहोगी, जो किकारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
का.आ. 1773.- आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( iv ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा " पापुलेशन फाउण्डेशन ऑफ इंडिया , बी-28 , कुतुब इंस्टिट्यूशनल एरिया , नई दिल्ली" को कर- निर्धारण वर्ष 2005-2006 से 2007-2008 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उप - खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है, अर्थात्ः-
(iv) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;
(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।
(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;
[अधिसूचना सं. 138 /2005/फा. सं. 197/40/2005 - आयकर नि.-[] दीपक गर्ग , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 4th May , 2005 (INCOME-TAX)
( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों कीकिसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर- जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;
S.U. 1772.-In exercise of powers conferred by the sub-clause (iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " National Federation of the Blind , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub -clause for the assessment years 2003-2004 to 2005-2006 subject to the following conditions , namely:-
(iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी, जोकि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा- पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
(1) the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;
4803 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
( iv ) कर निर्धारिती आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आय कर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;
(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियाँ और परिसम्पतियाँ समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी ।
[ अधिसूचना सं. 139/2005/फा. सं. 197/31 /2005- आयकर नि. - 1 ]
35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ विश्वविद्यालये, कॉलेज अथवा अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 1-4-2004से दिनांक 31-3-2007 तक की अवधि के लिए हैदराबाद आई रिसर्च फाउण्डेशन , एल. वी . प्रसाद आई इंस्टीट्यूट, एल. वी . प्रसाद मार्ग, बंजारा हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500034 जो अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य-कलापों में कार्यरत है, ( और न कि अनुसंधान मात्र के लिए मौजूद ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ ' रूप में है ) , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया जाता है :-
दीपक गर्ग, अवर सचिव
(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।
New Delhi , the 4th May, 2005
( INCOME- TAX)
S.O. 1773. In exercise of powers conferred by the sub -clause ( iv) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the " Population Foundation of India , B-28 , Qutub Institutional Area , New Delhi " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2005-2006 to 2007-2008 subject to the following conditions , namely :-
( ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वित्त वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है , अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आय एवं व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को आयकर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर, जो भी समाप्त हो , प्रस्तुत करेगा । जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( i ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है । ( i) the assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;
(iii) यह संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में उल्लिखित आय तथा व्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाणपत्र भी संलग्न करेगा: -
(ii ) the assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above other- wise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in Sub - section ( 5) of Section 11 ;
(क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 ( 1 ) ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं ।
(ख) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए ही था ।
( iii) this notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;
(iv) the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income- tax authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income-tax Act , 1961 ;
[अधिसूचना सं. 140/2005/फा. सं. 203/6/2005-आ.क. नि. - 11 ] रेनूजौहरी, निदेशक New Delhi , the 5th May, 2005 (INCOME-TAX)
(v) that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organisation withsimilar objectives .
[Notification No. 139/2005/F.No . 197/31 /2005 - ITA -1 ]
DEEPAK GARG, Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 5 मई, 2005
(आयकर )
S.O. 1774. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Hyderabad. Eye Research Foundation , L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, L. V. Prasad Marg , Banjara Hills , Hyderabad - 500034 has been approved by the Central Government for the purposes of clause ( ii ) of Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 , read with rule 6 of the Income - tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2007 under the category , ' university , college or other institution ' , partly engaged in research activities (and not as a ' Scientific Research Association ' का.आ. 1774.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा य ह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 4804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
existing solely for research ) subject to the following conditions : -
(i) The approved organisation shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .
(ii) For each of the financial years for which the approval is being given, the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income and Expenditure account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of Income - tax Act , 1961 to the Commissioner of Income -tax or Director of Income -tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction , on or before the due date of filing of return of income or within 90 days from the date of this notification , whichever expires later.
(iii) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income and Expenditure account referred to in paragraph ( ii ) above , a certificate from the auditor:-
(a) specifying the amount received by the organization for scientific research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii) of Sub- section (1) of Section 35.
(b) Certifying that the expenditure incurred was for scientific research .
[Notification No. 140/2005/F.No . 203 /6/ 2005 - ITA - II ] RENU JAUHARI, Director ( आर्थिक कार्य विभाग ) (बैंकिंग प्रभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 2 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1775.- सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त. शक्तियोंका प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा निम्नांकित सारणी के कालम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारी , जो सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के समकक्ष स्तर का अधिकारी है , को उक्त अधिनियम के उद्देश्योंके लिए प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करने और उक्त सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट सरकारी परिसरों के संबंध में इस अधिनियम द्वारा या इसके अंतर्गत सम्पदा अधिकारी को सौंपे गए कर्तव्यों को पूरा करनेके लिए सम्पदा अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है: सारणी
अधिकारी का पद नाम स्थानीय इकाई/क्षेत्राधिकार 1
2
स्टेट बैंक आफ सौराष्ट्र का या उसके द्वारा या उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए या अधिगृहीत किए गए भारत में अवस्थित परिसर ।
मुख्य प्रबन्धक ( विधि) , स्टेट बैंक आफ सौराष्ट्र, आंचलिक कार्यालय, अहमदाबाद ।
[फा. सं. 15/4/97- बीओए ] डी. पी. भारद्वाज, अवर सचिव
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] (Department of Economic Affairs ) (Banking Division)
New Delhi , the 2nd May , 2005
S.O. 1775. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants ) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Table below, being an officer equivalent in rank to a gazetted officer of the Government , to be Estate Officer for the purposes of the said Act to exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act in respect of the public premises specified in column (2) of the said Table , namely:
TABLE
Local Unit/ Jurisdiction Designation of the Officer
2
1
Premises belonging to or taken on lease or requisition by or on behalf of the State Bank of Saurashtra at any place in India.
ChiefManager (Law ) , StateBank of Saurashtra , ZonalOffice, Ahmedabad .
[F. No. 15 /4/97 -BOA] D.P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secу .
संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (दूरसंचार विभाग ) ( राजभाषा अनुभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 5 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1776.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 ( यथा संशोधित, 1987 ) के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय, दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :-
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड, कर्नाटक परिमण्डल, बेंगलूर-560008
1. महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिल्ला, शिवमोग्गा
2. मंडल अभियंता ग्रामीण, शिवमोग्गा-
3. मंडल अभियंता प्रतिष्ठापन, शिवमोग्गा
4. मंडल अभियंता सतर्कता, शिवमोग्गा [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4805
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
5. मंडल अभियंता तार, शिबमौग्गा
6. उप मंडल अभियंता ट्रंक्स, शिवमोग्गा
7. उप मंडल अभियंता फोन, शिवमौग्गा
8. उप मंडल अभियंता ओ सी बी, शिवमोग्गा
१. उप मंडल अभियंता, ई 10बी , शिवमोग्गा
10. तार घर, शिवमोग्गा
11. मंडल अभियंता ग्रामीण, भद्रावती
12. उप मंडल अधकारी तार, भद्रवती
13. मंडल अभियंता, सागर
14. उप मंडल अधिकारी तार, सागर
[सं. ई -11016/1/2004 - रा.भा. ] हरीश चन्द्र जयाल, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Department of Telecommunications )
(O. L. Section)
New Delhi , the 5th May, 2005
S. O. 1776.- In pursuance of Rule 10 ( 4) of the Official Language ( Use for official purpose of the Union) Rules , 1976 ( as amended 1987 ) , the Central Government hereby notifies the following Offices under the administrative control of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology , Department of Telecommunications where of more than 80 % of staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi:-
Chief General Manager Telecom , BSNL , Karnataka Circle, Bangalore-560008
1. General Manager, Telecom . Distt . Shivmoga 2. Divisional Engineer , Rural , Shivmoga 3. Divisional Engineer , Establishment . Shivmoga 4. Divisional Engineer , Vigilance , Shivmoga 5. Divisional Engineer , Telegraph , Shivmoga 6. Sub Divisional Engineer , Trunks , Shivmoga 7. Sub Divisional Officer , Phone , Shivmoga 8. Sub Divisional Engineer , OCB , Shivmoga 9. Sub Divisional Engineer , E 10 B , Shivmoga 10. Telegraph Office , Shivmoga
11. Divisional Engineer , Rural , Bhadravati 12. Sub Divisional Officer Telegraph , Bhadravati 13 . Divisional Engineer , Sagar
14. Sub Divisional Officer , Sagar .
[No. E. 11016/1/2004 ( O.L. ) ] HARISH CHANDRA JAYAL , Jt. Secy.
स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय
(स्वास्थ्यविभाग)
(पी.एम.एस. अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1777.- दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है; नामतः-
अनुसूचीके भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 62 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के पश्चात्निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी , नामतः
बीडीएस (श्रीनगर) 1. गवर्नमेंट डेंटल कालेज एंड हास्पिटल , श्रीनगर
63. कश्मीर विश्वविद्यालय , श्रीनगर
( i ) बैचलर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी (यदि 26 एवं 27 नवम्बर , 1990 को अथवा इसके बाद दी गई हो) ।
[सं.वी -12018/2/2005- पी एम एस ] ए. के. सिंह, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health) (P.M.S. Section) New Delhi , the 10th May , 2005
S. O. 1777. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (2) of Section 100 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
In Part - 1 of the Schedule , after Serial No. 62 , and the entries relating thereto , the following Serial Number and entries shall be added , namely :-
Government Dental
BDS (Srinagar) 63. Kashmir 1. University, Srinagar
College and Hospital , Srinagar
(i) Bachelor ofDental Surgery (When granted onor after 26th and 27th November , 1990 )
[No. V- 12018/2/2005 - PMS] A. K. SINGH, Under Secy .
4806
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
उपभोक्तामामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1778.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मेट्रो इलेक्ट्रानिक वेईंग इंडस्ट्रीज # 7-11-3, # 7-11-4 , टी एस पी स्ट्रीट, महंतीपुरम, विजयवाड़ा-520001 , आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम आई जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेट्रो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /2003 /532 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति मापी गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 52 ) /2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4807 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
New Delhi , the 14th April , 2005
S.O. 1778. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 1 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing in- strument with digital indication of "MIJ " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " METRO " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Metro Electronic Weighing Industries # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4 , T.S.P. Street, Mahanthipuram, Vijaywada - 520001 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2003/ 532 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 300g and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10ing . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10*, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM-21 ( 52 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 4808
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1779.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मेट्रो इलेक्ट्रानिक वेईंग इंडस्ट्रीज # 7-11-3, # 7-11-4, टी एस पी स्ट्रीट, महंतीपुरम, विजयवाड़ा-520001 , आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम आई टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेट्रो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/533 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;
-
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति मापी गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलून परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 52) /2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4809 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
New Delhi , the 14th April, 2005
S.O. 1779. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MIT " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "METRO" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s Metro Electronic Weighing Industries # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4 , T.S.P. Street , Mahanthipuram , Vijaywada - 520001 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2003/ 533 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' c ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 (52 )/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 1358 G1 / 2005-8 4810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART I-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1780.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेट्रो इलेक्ट्रानिक वेईंग इंडस्ट्रीज # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4, टी एस पी स्ट्रीट, महंतीपुरम , विजयवाड़ा -520001 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एम आई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेट्रो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2003 /534 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति मापी गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टॉम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मांडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर और 300 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम .- 21 ( 52 ) /2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4811 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 14th April , 2005
S.O. 1780.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MIP " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " METRO " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s . Metro Electronic Weighing Industries # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4 , T.S.P. Street , Mahanthipuram , Vijaywada - 520001 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003/ 534;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 60 kg and minimum capacity of 250g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 300 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 52 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 4812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1781.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेट्रो इलेक्ट्रानिक वेईंग इंडस्ट्रीज # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4, टी एस पी स्ट्रीट, महंतीपुरम, विजयवाड़ा-520001 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एम आई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेट्रो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /2003 / 535 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति मापी गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसको अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर और 1000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10%, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 52 )/2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4813 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
New Delhi , the 14th April , 2005
S.O. 1781. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic ( Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MIP " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "METRO " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Metro Electronic Weighing Industries # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4 , T.S.P. Street , Mahnathipuram , Vijaywada - 520001 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the ap- proval mark IND/ 09/ 2003 /535 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 1000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 52)/ 2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Míetrology 4814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1782.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त भॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेट्रो SÜTYEN OBEZ SCHYA # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4, टी एस पी स्ट्रीट , महंतीपुरम; विजयवाड़ा-520001 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एम आई सी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेट्रो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2003/ 536 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति मापी गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( प्लेटफार्म के लिए संपरिवर्तन किट ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है। सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टैम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त , कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान-1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , ' के' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 52 )/2003 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4815
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 14th April , 2005
S.O. 1782. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Conversion Kit for Platform Machine ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MIC " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III) and with brand name " METRO " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Metro Electronic Weighing Industries # 7-11-3 , # 7-11-4 , T.S.P. Street , Mahanthipuram , Vijaywada - 520001 , Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2003 / 536;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion Kit for Platform Machine ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light einitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments opcrates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 ( 52 )/2003 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 4816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii))
नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1783.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स राशी इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स, पी . ओ. बाक्स सं० 1537 , बाई पास रोड, उक्कादम , कोयम्बतूर -641001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आर डी पी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन सिक्क प्रचालित ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " राशी डिगी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2004/364 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल विकृति ( स्ट्रेन ) गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
Rast Digi
जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया और, केन्द्रीय सरकारं उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 100 कि.ग्रा . से 200 कि. ग्रा. तक कीरेंज तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, ' के ' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 55 ) /2004 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4817 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
New Delhi , the 26th April , 2005
S.O. 1783. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Mea- sures (Approval of models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of non - automatic weighing instrument with digital indication (Person weighing machine- coin operated) of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) belonging to ' RD - PW' series with brand name " RASI - DIGI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Rasi Engineering Works , P.O. Box No. 15,37 , By Pass Road , Ukkadam , Coimbatore -641001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 2003 /364 ;
The said model ( see the figure given) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with the maximum capacity of 150 kg and minimum capacity of Ikg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 50g . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . It operates on 230V, and 50Hz alternate current power supply .
practices. In addition to sealing the stamping plate , machine shall also be sealed to prevent its opening for fraudulent Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100 kg to 200 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 55 )/2004 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 1358 GI /2005-9 4818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14,2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SE . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1784.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओ सी एम ई, एस आर आई , वाया डेल पोपोलो 20/ए, 43100, परमा, इटली द्वारा विनिर्मित और भारत में मैसर्स फ्रूड इंजीनियरिंग सर्विम , 42 , स्वास्तिक प्लाजा , प्रथम तल, जी वी पी डी स्कीम , कला निकेतन से अगला, मुम्बई -400049 द्वारा विणित " लिब्रा " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक स्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित घुमण भार भरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " लिब्रा आर 5 " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/424 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) स्वचालित इन लाइन भार भरण ( धुमण भार भरण ) मशीन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 लिटर है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 मि. लिटर है । यह ल्यूब तेल , खाद्य तेल, डिटरजेंट, रसायनों और अन्य द्रव उत्पादों को भरने के लिए डिजाइन की गई है । स्टाम्मिग पोट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त, कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 250 मि.लि. में 30 लिटर तक की रेंज की क्षमता वाले हैं ।
[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 9 ) /2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4819
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 26th April, 2005
S.O. 1784. Whereas the Central Governraent , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating , Auto- matic Inline Weight Filler Machine (Rotatory Weigh Filler) of " LIBRA " series with brand name " LIBRA R5 " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . OCME S. r . I. , Via del Popolo 20/A , 43100 , Parma, Italy and marketed in India by M/ s . Food Engineering Services , 42, Swastic Plaza, 1st Floor , JVPD Scheme , Next to Kala Niketan, Mumbai -400 049 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2004/424;
The said model is an Automatic Inline Weight Filler Machine ( Rotatory Weight Filler) with a maximum capacity 5 litre and minimum capacity 250 ml . It is designed to fill lube oil , edibie oil , detergents, chemicals and other liquid products .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate, scaling is also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36. of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 250 ml to 30 litre manufac- tured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 9 )/2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director of Legal Metrology 4820
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 26 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1785.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एफ एस टी इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, प्रथम तल, प्लाट नं. 64 , इन्डस्ट्रीयल फोकल पाइंट , फेस IX, मोहाली, जिला- रोपड, पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " बी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मापकार प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एवरराइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2004/406 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक अपरूपण तुलादण्ड प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलंन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आंद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
HEALTH
CONSCIOUS !
T
सम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त, मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 % , के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्य हैं ।
[फ़ा.सं. डब्ल्यू. एम. - 21 ( 148 ) /2002 ]
पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4821 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/ वैशाख 24 , 1927
New Delhi , the 26th April , 2005
S.O. 1785. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of nonautomatic weighing instrument with digital indication (Person weighing scale ) of " BW " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) and with brand name " Ever Right " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . FST Electronics , 1st Floor, Plot No. 64, Industrial Focal Point, Phase- IX, Mohali , District-Roper , Punjab and which is as- signed the approval mark IND/09/2004/406;
The said model ( see the figure given below) is a shear beam type load cell based wighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply:
HEALTH CONSCIOUST
In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent tlic opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section36 , of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 200kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or inore and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 % , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved said Model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 148)/ 2002 ]
P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY , Director Legal Metrology 4822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
[PART I- SI: C . 3 (ii) ]
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1786.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम, 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -
क्रम संख्या
स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
(1)
(2)
1
आई एस 2556 ( भाग 2 ) : 2004 कोचाभ स्वच्छता साधित्र (कोचाभ चीनी मिट्टी)- विशिष्टि: भाग 2 : शौच कुंडों के लिए विशिष्टिअपेक्षाएं
2 आई एस 2556 ( भाग 3 ) : 2004 कोचाभ स्वच्छता साधित्र ( कोचाभ चीनी मिट्टी) - विशिष्टि: भाग 3 बिठाव कुंडों के लिए विशिष्टिअपेक्षाएं
3
आई एस 2556 ( भाग 4 ) : 2004 कोचाभ स्वच्छता साधित्र ( कोचाभ चीनी मिट्टी ) - विशिष्टि: भाग 4 : वॉश बेसिन के लिए विशिष्टि अपेक्षाएं
4 आई एस 2556 ( भाग 8 ) : 2004 कोचाभ स्वच्छता साधित्र ( कोचाभ चीनी मिट्टी ) - विशिष्टि: भाग 8 पिडस्टल क्लोज युग्मन वाशडाउन और साइफोनिक जल मुत्रालयों आधानों की विशिष्टि अपेक्षाएं
5 आई एस 2556 ( भाग 9 ) : 2004 कोचाभ स्वच्छता साधित्र ( कोचाभ चीनी मिट्टी) - विशिष्टि: भाग 9 पिडस्टल प्रकार के बिडेटों के लिए विशिष्टि अपेक्षाएं
6 आई एस 2556 ( भाग 15 ) : 2004 कोचाभ स्वच्छता साधित्र (कोचाभ चीनी मिट्टी ) - विशिष्टि: भाग 15 यूनिवर्सल जल मूत्रालय आधानों की विशिष्टि अपेक्षाएं
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
(4) (3)
IS 2556 ( Part 2 ) : 1994
30जून, 2005 IS 2556 ( Part 3 ) : 1994
30जून, 2005 IS 2556 ( Part 4 ) : 1994
30जून, 2005 IS 2556 ( Part 8 ) : 1995
30 जून, 2005 IS 2556 ( Part 9 ) : 1995
30जून, 2005
30जून, 2005 IS 2556 ( Part 15) : 1995
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[सं. सीईडी/गजट ] सतीश कुमार जैन, निदेशक व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी ) 4823 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
New Delhi , the 28th April , 2005
S.O. 1786.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1) of Rules ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-
SCHEDULE
Sl . No.
Date of Established No. & Year of the Indian Standards Establsihed
No. & year of Indian Standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
1
IS 2556 (Part 2) : 1994
30 June, 2005 IS 2556 (Part 2) : 2004 Vitreous Sanitary Appliances (Vitreous China) -Specification : Part 2 Specific Requirements of Weshdown Water Closets
2
IS 2556 (Part 3 ) : 1994
30 June , 2005 IS 2556 (Part 3 ) : 2004 Vitreous Sanitary Appliances (Vitreous China ) -Specification : Part 3 Specific Requirements of Squatting Pans
3
IS 2556 (Part 4) : 1994
30 June, 2005 IS 2556 (Part 4) : 2004 Vitreous Sanitary Appliances (Vitreous China) -Specification : Part 4 Specific Requirements of Wash Basins
IS 2556 (Part 8) : 1995
30 June, 2005 IS 2556 (Part 8 ) : 2004 ( Vitreous SanitaryAppliances ( Vitreous China) -Specification : Part 8 Specific Requirements of Pedestal Close coupled Washdown and Syphonic water closets
5
IS 2556 (Part 9 ) : 1995
30 June, 2005 IS 2556 (Part 9) : 2004 ( Vitreous Sanitary Appliances ( Vitreous China) -Specification : Part 9 Specific Requirements of Pedestal
Type Bidets
6
30 June, 2005
IS 2556 ( Part 15) : 1995
IS 2556 (Part 15) : 2004 ( Vitreous Sanitary Appliances ( Vitreous China) -Specification: Part 15 Specific Requirements of Universal Water Closts
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Nagpur, patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[No. CED/Gazette]
S. K. JAIN, Director & Head (Civil Engineering) 4824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 2 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1787.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-
क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष
(2)
(1)
1.
आई एस 940 : 2003
2.
आई एस 13849 : 1993
3.
आई एस 947: 1985
4.
आई एस 2878 : 2004
5.
आई एस 8149 : 1994
6.
आई एस 10658 : 1999
7.
आई एस 13385: 1992
8.
आई एस 13386: 1992
9.
आई एस 14609 : 1999
10.
आई एस 14951 : 2001
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (3)
(4) 1मार्च, 2005
31मार्च, 2005 5मार्च , 2005
31मार्च, 2005 1 अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 1 अप्रैल, 2005
1अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 4अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 4अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 5अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 3अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 1 अप्रैल, 2005
30अप्रैल, 2005 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[सं. सीईडी/राजपत्र ] सतीश कुमार जैन, निदेशक व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )
New Delhi , the 2nd May , 2005
S.O. 1787. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , par- ticulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-
Sl . No.
SCHEDULE
No. and year of the amendment
No. and year of the Indian Standards
(1)
(2)
1.
IS 940 : 2003
Date from which the amend- ment shall have effect (3)
(4)
1 March, 2005
2.
IS 13849 : 1993
31 March , 2005
5March, 2005
IS 947 : 1985
3.
31March , 2005
30 April , 2005
1April , 2005
IS 2878 : 2004
4.
1 April , 2005
5.
IS 8149 : 1994
30 April , 2005
1April, 2005
6.
IS 10658 : 1999
30 April, 2005
30 April , 2005
4April , 2005
7.
IS 13385 : 1992
30 April , 2005
4April , 2005
8.
IS 13386 : 1992
30April , 2005
5 April , 2005
9.
IS 14609 : 1999
3 April, 2005
10.
IS 14951 : 2001
30 April, 2005
1 April , 2005
30 April , 2005 4825
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkatta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
[No. CED/Gazette] S. K. JAIN , Director & Head ( Civil Engg. )
नई दिल्ली, 2 मई , 2005
का.आ. 1788.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-
संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संख्या
(1)
(2)
1.
1328: 1996
2.
3087 : 1985
3.
3097 : 1980
4:
4990 : 1993
5.
5509 : 2000
6.
12823 : 1990
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (3)
(4)
31मार्च , 2005 3जनवरी , 2005
8जनवरी , 2005
31मार्च, 2005
31मार्च, 2005 4फरवरी, 2005
31मार्च, 2005 3फरवरी , 2005
31मार्च , 2005 1 फरवरी, 2005
31मार्च, 2005 5फरवरी , 2005
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[सं. सीईडी/राजपत्र ] सतीश कुमार जैन, निदेशक व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )
New Delhi , the 2nd May , 2005
S.O. 1788. In pursuance of clause (b) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , par- ticulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-
Sl . No.
SCHEDULE
No. and year of the amendment
No. and year of the Indian Standards
(1)
(2)
1.
1328 : 1996
Date from which the amend- ment shall have effect
(4)
(3)
31 March , 2005 3 January, 2005
2.
3087 : 1985
31 March , 2005 8 January , 2005
3.
3097 : 1980
31 March , 2005
4February , 2005
4.
4990 : 1993
31 March, 2005
3 February, 2005
5.
5509 : 1993
31 March , 2005 1 February, 2005
6.
12823 : 1990
31 March, 2005
5 February, 2005
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
1358 Gl /2005-10
[No. CED/Gazette] S. K. JAIN , Director & Head ( Civil Engg. ) 4826
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 2 मई , 2005
का.आ. 1789.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक(कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-
अनुसूची
संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष
क्रम संख्या
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1.
आई एस 4326 : 1993
3मार्च, 2005
31मार्च , 2005 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल. भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[सं. सीईडी/राजपत्र ]
सतीश कुमार जैन, निदेशक व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )
New Delhi , the 2nd May , 2005
S.O. 1789. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl . No.
No. and year of the amendment
No. and Year of the Indian Standards
Date from which the amend- ment shall have effect
(4) (1)
(2)
(3)
1
IS 4326 : 1993
31 March, 2005
3 March, 2005
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkatta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
[No. CED/Gazette]
S. K. JAIN , Director & Head ( Civil Engg. )
नई दिल्ली, 6 मई , 2005
एत क.आ. 1790.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम, 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
क्रम
स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
(2)
(4) (1)
(3.)
नवम्बर, 2004
फरवरी, 2005 ड़ियों
आईएस 4696 ( भाग 1 ) : 2005 मीट्रिक बट्रैस चूड़ियोंके लिए आयाम भाग 1 चूड़ी की प्रोफाइल आईएस 4. ( भाग ४ ) : 2005 मीट्रिक बट्रैस * आयाम भाग 4 छूट प्रणाली (दूसरा पु ) 4827 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
मार्च, 2005 3. आईएस 8385 : 2005 हाइड्रोलिक द्रव पावर- फिल्टर अव्यव- द्रव के साथ सामग्री अनुकूलता की जाँच ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )
मार्च, 2005 4. आईएस 9519 : 2005 बंधन सामग्री-षटकोणीय उत्पाद- फ्लैट के आर पार चौड़ाई ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)
दिसम्बर, 2004 5. आईएस 10129: 2004 हाइड्रोलिक द्रव पावर- विस्थापन पम्पों और मोटरों के आरोपण फ्लैंजों तथा शाफ्ट सिरों के आयाम और पहचान कोड (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
मार्च , 2005 6. आईएस 11003 ( भाग 1 ) : 2005 हाइड्रोलिक द्रव पावर- एक रॉड सिलिंडर के आरोपण आयाम, 16 मेगापास्कल ( 160 बार) श्रृंखला , भाग 1 मध्यम श्रृंखला ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )
मार्च, 2005 7. आईएस 13535 : 2005 हाइड्रोलिक द्रव पावर फिल्टर- अव्यव की फिल्टरन कार्यकारिता के मूल्यांकन की मल्टीपास पद्धति ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )
मार्च, 2005 8. आईएस 14150 : 2005 हाइड्रॉलिक द्रव पावर- दाब छूट वॉल्व-आरोपण सतह ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[सं. पीजीडी/जी-3.5 ] राकेश कुमार, निदेशक व प्रमुख ( पीजीडी)
New Delhi , the 6th May, 2005
S.O. 1790.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl . No.
Date of Established No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established
No. & year of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Sdard
(1)
(2)
(4)
1.
November, 2004 IS 4696 (Part 1) : 2004 Dimensions for metric buttress threads Part 1 Threads Profiles (Second Revision)
2.
Febr
IS4696 (Part 4) : 2005 Dimensions for metric buttress threads Part 4 Tolerancing System (Second Revision) 4828
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] (1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
March, 2005 3. IS 8385 : 2005 Hydraulic fluid power-Filter elements-Verifica- tion of material compatibility with fluids ( First Revision)
March, 2005 4. IS 9519 : 2005 Fasteners-Hexagon Products-Width Across Flats (FirstRevision)
December, 2005 5. IS 10129 : 2004 Hydraulic fluid power-Dimensions and identifi- cation code for mounting flanges and shaft ends of displacement pumps and motors (Second Revision)
March, 2005 6. IS 11003 (Part 1) : 2005 Hydraulic fluid power-Mounting dimensions for single rod cylinders , 16 MPa (160 bar) series-Part 1 Medium series ( First Revision )
March, 2005 7. IS 13535 : 2005 Hydraulic fluid power filters-Multipass method for evaluating filteration perfor- mance of a filter element ( First Revision)
March, 2005 8. IS 14150 : 2005 Hydraulic fluid power-Pressure retief valves- Mounting surfaces first Revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .
[No. PGD/G- 3.5 ]
RAKESH KUMAR, Director & Head ( PGD) 4829 [ भाग -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 9 मई , 2005
का. आ. 1791.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री शिवदत्त गौड़, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, डी-7 लालबहादुर नगर ( पूर्व ) क्लार्क्स आमेर होटल के सामने , जवाहरलाल नेहरु मार्ग , मालवीय नगर, जयपुर-302017 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
:
अनुसूची
जिला : अजमेर
राज्य : राजस्थान तहसील : किशनगढ़
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं.
गाँव का नाम
हेक्टेयर
क्रम सं.
एयर वर्ग मीटर
3
4
5
6 2
1
0
01
15
494(स.नाला)
1. भुवाड़ा
0
01
22
493(स.नाला)
0
03
35
489(स.चारागाह)
03
57
0
492(स .नाला)
402
05
53
0
70
6.6
0
00
0
00. 32
167(स.भूमि)
2. मुण्डोलाव
0.1
365/2
0
57 3. देवपुरी
0
07
34
384
407/1
0
02
38
407/2
407/3
}
340
0
05
84 4830
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24,1927
[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2
3
5
の
4
0
02
06
316(स.आबादी)
134
0
01
25
1337
0
00
45 4. कट्सुरा
0
00
61
28(स.नडी)
0
161
01
83
0
06 64
214(स. चारागाह)
0
258/3/2
00
87
0
32
01 5. धौलपुरीया
645(सं.भूमि)
0
573
01
95
572
0
01
02
0
491
01
75
455
0
00
89
0
00
452
98
0
423
01
12 6. टिहरी
398
0
17
82
265
0
15
21
207
0
03
77
210
0
02
19
211
0
0.1
40
158/477
0
01
77
162
0
01
05
[फा. सं. आर-31015/43/2004- ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi , the 9th May, 2005
S. O. 1791.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra ( Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline. it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;
4831
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule , may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Shivdutt Gaur , Competent Authority, Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline Project , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , D-7 , Lal Bahadur Nagar ( East ) , Opp . Clarks Amer Hotel , Jawaharlal Nehru Marg , Malviya Nagar, Jaipur - 302017 ( Rajasthan)
SCHEDULE
State : RAJASTHAN
District : AJMER
Tehsil : KISHANGARH
Area
Hectare Are
Khasara No.
Sq.mtr. Sr. No
Name of the Village
6
4
5
3
1
2
0
15
01
1. BHUNWADA
494(G/L Nala )
22
0
01
493(G/L Nala)
03
0
35
489(G/L Pasture)
0
03
57
492(G/L Nala)
05
53
0
402
70
66
0
00
2. MUNDOLAV
32
0
00
167(G/L)
0
01
57
365/2
3. DEVPURI
07
34
0
384
407/1
。
38
02
407/2 }
407/3
05
340
0
84
02 06
0
316(G /L Abadi )
0
01
25
134
0
00 45
1337
4. KATSURA
61
0
00
28 (G/L Nadi )
161
0
01
83
06 64
0
214( G /L Pasture)
87
0
258/3/2
00
01
32.
645(G/L)
5. DHOLPURIYA
0
01 95
573
01
572
02
0
01
75
0
491
89
0
00
455
98
0
00
452
12
0
423
01
17
82
0
398
6.. TIHRI
15
0
21
265
77
03
207
0
210
0
02 19
0
40
01
211
ン
0
01
77
158/477
01 05
162
0
[No. R- 31015 /43/2004- O.R. - II ]
HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
4832
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24. 1927
PARI 11- SL 3 ( ⅱ ) |
नई दिल्ली, 9 मई , 2005
का. आ. 1792.- केंद्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधिन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ . 3039 तारीख 23 नवम्बर , 2004, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से सलंग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मेसर्स गैस ट्रान्स्पोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के गोवा में उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट में खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओं से महाराष्ट्र राज्य में ठाणे जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गैस ट्रान्स्पोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 10 जनवरी ,2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्वय किया है ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
आनूसूची
वाडा
जिल्हा: ठाणे
मंडल/तेहसिल/तालुक:
राज्य: महाराष्ट्र
गाँव कानाम
सर्वे नंबर
आर. ओ. यु . अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर
एर सिएर 1
2
3
4
5
19
1) मेट
00
22
34
22पी
00
75
56
25/सी
00
03
25
25/डी
00
15
31
00
25/ई
02
15
26
00
00
10
39
00
18
95 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4833
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
147/
2) बोक्सई
147/1
5 3
4
00
06
95 00
25
25 00
09
48
गट नं .147 और 171 के बीच में राजमार्ग 35
171
145/ए
177
176
175
141
140
138
142/पी
गटनं . 138और 83 के बीच में नाल्म
83
80
85/ए
85/बी
87/
90
91
93
53
52
96
50
49
51
11
48
12
13
19
20
21
43
40
38
509/बी
33
37
36
35
34
509/ए
508
1358 Gl/2005-11
00
22
30 00
00
23 00
21
18 00
47
75 00
05
61
07
00
58 00
02
01 00
59
01
00
04
60
06
00
21 00
04
05
18
00
97 00
83
08
07
00
89 00
77
08
00
17
17
00
17
57
10
09 00
00
01
84 00
00
77 00
16
15
00
20
08
16
82 00
12
00
80 00
00
25
15 00
14
35
07
00
02 00
03
37
00
00
11
14
00
65 :
00
15
61 00
18
06
18
00
19
18 00
02
80 00
01
08
00
13
57 00
06
38 00
56
13
00
61 00
04
15
26 00
54
03
00 4834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
526
3) मुसारणे
535
536
539/बी
539/
543
544
545
551
552
550
549
553
554
555
459
556/ए
447
446/ए
445
444/0
441/ए
440
439
438
562
563
385
328
327
322
324
66
256
255
254
71/बी
250
221
224
223
227
222
220
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5 00
00
84 00
06
18 00
21
10 00
08
95
00
84 00
15
00
38 00
00
10
16
18 00
00
11
14 00
06
48
02
55 00
00
01
82
13
02 00
00
03
55
02
00
51 00
94
03
00
00
25
47
01
00
01
00
80 00
01
79 00
04
50
83 00
03
00
09
46
30 00
08
02
66 0.0
20
00
73
01
00
40 00
56
28
35 00
11
00
17
17
00
30
21
00
15
88 00
32
83
04
00
78 00
09
64 00
37
10
00
37
54 00
01
53 00
14
09 00
02
07 00
04
13 00
02
41
26
04
00
98 00
05 4835
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[ भाग !! - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 1
216/डी
3)बुखारणे (नीरंतर)
216/बी
216/बी
219
216/ए
217/ए
218
214/ए
213
201
212
203
202
178
4.)चिंचघर
188
181
203
216
217
220
221
222
212/सी
258/ए
260
261
262
263
265
308
13/1
5) विजयगड
10/4
10/2
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/9
5/5
5/3/1
5/1
5/2/1
3
4
5 00
10
81 00
09
93 00
68
05
00
57
05
00
05
47
05
00
57 00
05
93 00
21
37 00
03
69
48
00
96 00
02
63 00
00
10 00
17
38
37 00
02
11
55 00
00
07
04
00
43
50 00
67
01
00
13
24
00
44
08
00
13
15
37 00
34
00
25
21
00
09
50
10
00
29
12
46 00
00
12
93 00
11
26 00
08
20 00
04
41
04
00
65
14
00
48
18
00
88
07
05 00
00
00
21 00
12
48 00
00
28
07
65 00
00
01
80
04
21 00
74 00
02
02
21 00 4836
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2 5) जिसायगढ़ ( 예언서 )
गट नं .5 और 6 के बीच में रस्ता
6/14/1
6/12
6/7/1
6/6
6/4
गट नं . 6/6 और गाव सीमा के बीच में गाडी रस्ता
4/3
4/2
4/1
15/6
6) डॉगस्ते
15/7अ
15/7क
15/5
15/1अ+4
[PART I- SL 3 ( ii ) ]
4
3
5
02
62 00
00
52
08
98 00
04
00
14
49
84 00
02
79 00
00
09
00
42 00
10
00
00
00
19
49 00
00
06
00
97
00 00
09
06
86 00
43
04
00
54
09
00
10 00
02
सर्वे नं . 15/1 और 14/15 के बीच में नाला
14/15
14/14
14/9अ
14/9ब
14/8
14/2/1
3/1
3/13क
3/7
3/9
3/11अ
3/11 व
3/115
3/11 ई
3/5अ
3/5व
3/5क
17 00
04
06
95 00
02
24 00
20
03
00
03
58 00
10
00
81
04
73 00
10 00
00
20 00
17
06 00
02
04 00
08
00
01
08
00 00
07
92 00
02
88
02
00
32 00
05
50 00
05
00 00
03
सर्वेनं . 3/5 और 4/6 के बीच में नाला
4/6
4/4
5/8
5/5
5/4
37/6
5/3
5/ 2व
5/2क
36/1ए
34/14
25
80 00
00
17
01
19 00
05
63 00
09
00
14
00
07
00
14
03
16 00
12 00
05
00
10 00
56 00
34
00
18
80 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2 6) डोंगस्ते (नीरंतर)
4837 3
4
5 00
सर्वे नं 34/14 और 35/6 के बीच में रस्ता
35/6
35/9
35/4
35/5
35/3
196
7) बिलावली
195
197
194
187
186
184
183
181
208
202
203/बी
206
205
204
237
239/वी
238
249
250/ए
251
255
256
349
254
352
351
350
348
345
346
357
358
355
368
370
371
372
02
32 00
13
72 00
03
80 00
13
02 00
00
33 00
00
37 00
05
30 00
08
58 00
57
19 00
12
40 00
07
80 00
00
15 00
00
99 00
01
32 00
04
08
03
00
05 00
00
56
04
00
15 00
08
30 00
10
30 00
10
28 00
08
17 00
78
11
00
04
71 00
38
08
00
06
25 00
05
39 00
16
21 00
00
51 00
34
60 00
31
02
00
26
16
00
01
80 00
00
58 00
00
99
00
00
24
01
00
24 00
03
31
33
00
93 00
37
21
00
21
51
14
00
99 00
62
09
00
58
19 4838
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
2 1
417
7) बिलावली (नीरंतर)
420
421
422
424
423
431
440
437
438
439
441
443
444
445
447ए
448
449
461
469
466
468
465/ए
465/सी
464/ए
463
481
480
479/2
494
764/1पी
8) बिलोशी
776/1पी
22
21
20/1
19/सी
19/ए
27
13/2
63
61
56
60
गट नं . 63 और 64 के बीच में रस्ता
64
[ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5 00
29
11 00
04
62
03
00
54 00
13
97 00
06
02 00
10
87 00
14
03 00
11
30 00
00
10 00
00
78 00
02
00 00
15
82 00
07
15 00
00
01
00
00
49 00
37
19 00
03
86
05
00
54 00
02
99 00
27
45
03
00
80 00
06
93 00
23
66 00
21
03
00
18
49 00
26
90 00
67
05
00
59
05
00
23
78 00
47
29 00
59
22 00
47
51
00
18
03 00
42
44
00
15
43 00
43
02 00
64
28
00
36
03 00
17
50 00
89
23
16
00
08 00
01
24 00
06
31
40 00
03
00
01
12 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4839
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2 1
97
8) किलोशी (नीरंतर)
65
96
80
81
82
136
138
193
4
151
140
155
156
157
160
159
191
161
189
190
182
251
253
256
254
257
258
261
259
306
305
307
308
304
361
368
365/ए
365/बी
367
109
9) खानिक्ली
108
107
113
115
105
136
3
5
4
00
00
13 00
55
96 00
00
10
03
00
15 00
00
40 00
13
00 00
05
36 00
01
32 00
56
20
00
03
64 00
16
10 00
02
66 00
00
10 00
72
20
00
09
87
30 00
05
00
40
50 00
04
23 00
05
80 00
05
21
08
00
39 00
04
57 00
05
03 00
12
55 00
01
84 00
12
28 00
02
00 00
71
15
00
29
20
00
10 00
00
40
20
09
00
59 00
05
93 00
17
49
15
00
81 00
32
35 00
16
62 00
40
05 00
99
08
00
00
48 00
08
24 00
74
19
00
17
05
00
10
01 00
19
72
00
00
20 00
19
68 4840
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
2
135
9) खानिवली (नीरंतर)
137
159
158
157
200
199
198
197
196
212
211
210
209
222
218
217
213
219
186
10) अविस्ते बु .
187
गाव सीमा और गट नं . 187 के बीच में रस्ता
185
188
189/ए
189/बी
193
163
194
197
198
251
250
247
253
246
245
244
243
242
321
322
325
324
323
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3
5
4
00
14
07 00
36
74 00
06
44 00
02
76 00
00
13 00
13
59 00
00
84 00
02
67 00
36
26 00
03
35 00
16
23 00
50
15
00
07
65 00
57
29
00
29
60 00
55
46 00
05
03 00
01
74 00
06
00 00
00
10 00
17
49 00
02
53 00
04
66 00
29
04
17
00
85 00
13
36 00
09
28
67
94 00
00
16
54 00
00
86 00
04
19..
00
36
00
13
93 00
00
00
69 00
08
85
10 00
00
00
06
71 00
06
09
00
19
49
00
98 00
10
00
69 00
10
06 00
03
15
12
00
72 00
09
93 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii)]
4841
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2 1
320
10) अबिस्ते बु. ( निश्तर )
329
471
470
460
गट नं . 458 और 461 के बीच में राजमार्ग 34
461
462
463
455
458
454
452
450
519
81
11) अवित्ते बु.
88
80
86
78
84
77
76
74ए
97
103
104
132
131
130
129
137
गाव सीमा और गट नं . 137 के बीच में नदी 12) बरीक्सी
गाय सीमा और सर्वे नं . 137 के बीच में नदी
137/1
137/2
137/3
142/4
142/5
142/7
142/8
142/9
139/1
139/4
143/2
1358 GI /2005-12
4
3
5
32
00
18 00
23
28
13 00
11
00
11
43 00
10
00
00
07
41
05
00
90
33
03
00
01
84 00
25
00
27
78 00
29
46
91 00
01
00
04
46
51 00
04
33 00
00
00
10
05
38 00
00
38
16
20 00
10
82 00
01
23 00
06
00
42
18
00
01
21 00
28
02 00
14
97
17
00
28 00
04
27
87
27
00
00
13
69
66 00
20
00
62
11 00
51
78
00
20
64
16 00
24
15
00
00 00
14-
50 00
14
79 00
17
80 00
20
20
17
00 00
00
16
16
78 00
46 00
11
02
52 00
23
00
30 4842
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2 12) खरीवली (नीरंतर)
सर्वे नं 117 और 98 के बीच में
98/5
98/7
98/8
113/1
113/2
99/1
99/2
105′ 2
78/11अ
75/1
76/3
57/3
55/4
58/1
58/2
56/3/2
56/6अ
266/1
266/3
265,
264/8
सर्वे नं 267 में रस्ता
286/3
286/4
287/2
328/3
328/5
290/1
290/2
327/1
327/2
3/2
3/4
3/5
3/6
3/10
3/9
4/1
5/1
5/3
5/46
320/10
144/8
144/9
117/4
[ PART 11-S . 3 (ii ) ]
4
3
5 00
06
86 00
19
83 00
04
20 00
33
00 00
40
09
00
09
39 00
02
50 00
14
38 00
07
38 00
05
44 00
20
74 00
14
27
46 00
17
00
20
50
40 00
00
00
04
62 00
14
10 00
36
55 00
19
20 00
06
02 00
02
12 00
02
46 00
03
78 00
02
60 00
17
05
00
01
75
29
70 00
00
30
90 00
09
60 00
75
20
00
06
30 00
06
47
43
00
15 00
00
25
00
20 00
00
01
89 00
13
03 00
00
51 00
84
24
00
00
40 00
10
51
53 00
22
00
71
20
12
07 00
00
13
62
45 00
09 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2 12)
117/7अ
117/8अ
78/11की
78/2
78/3
78/6
78/8
78/9
267/1
267/2
267/3
267/6
267/8
267/10
10/2अ
10/2ी
60
13) भोपीची
59
66
67
64/पी
71
70/अ
72
73
51
85
42
41
40
39
27
28
20
19
15
17
18
16
13
12
211
210
212
209
70/
4843 3
4
5 00
43
37 00
09
45 00
18
45 00
39
20 00
26
46 00
02
90 00
02
00 00
01
15 00
06
00 00
05
06 00
10
80 00
21
60 00
14
01 00
19
80 00
17
80 00
17
64 00
17
76 00
04
74 00
04
09 00
03
95 00
06
83 00
08
30 00
01
81 00
04
15 00
08
16
18
55 00、
00
09
98 00
25
13
00
06
47 00
10
48 00
06
84
53
10 88
03 03 00
00
01
30 00
26
93 00
16
88 00
11
76 00
00
10 00
10
15
10
00
55 00
18
07
02 00
05
00
16
83 00
08
89 00
10
00
40
00
11 00
31
89
09
00
70 4844
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
2
22
14) मांडे
24/सी
25/ए
25/सी
26/ए
31
सर्वे नं 31 में रस्ता
सर्वेनं 31 और 43 के बीच में नाला
43
42
88
89
87
60
78
61/1
77
64
69
65
146पी
15) कळमखांड
150
149
153/ए
सर्वे नं 153 में राजमार्ग 35
सर्वे नं 153 में रस्ता
170
169
174/ए
175
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
4
5 3
00
07
13
08
00
63 00
07
16
16 00
07
02 00
21
37
26
00
02
01 00
72
06
00
99 00
23,
00
30
91
48
48 00
00
19
59 00
27
99
00
10 00
78
99 00
00
00
10 00
09
58 00
04
29 00
36
32
57
00
75
16
00
86 00
60
31 00
04
74
81
87 00
00
07
73
06
00
40 00
07
07 00
87
04
00
00
10 00
38
81 00
03
63
सर्व्हे नं 169 और 175 के बीच में रस्ता
179
178
177
186
187
188
190
191
192 192
197पी
238
193
194
195
231
196
19
24 00
00
16
20
95 00
11
07
00
99
11
00
92 00
17
14
17
00
09 00
21
00 00
44
11
00
46
31 00
21
38 00
58
37 00
63
26 00
69
86 00
00
10
05
00
64 [ भांग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4845
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
2 1
78
16) सुर्योा
79/पी
77
75/ए
75/बी
72/ए
71
67/की
89
66
141
गट नं . 141 में रस्ता
198
145/की
गट नं . 198 के बीच में नाला
176/ए
173
172
177
178
170
गट नं . 170 में रस्ता
169/
167/ए
166
223
222/की
221
88
17) ब्राम्हणगाव
87
53
55
56
57
गट नं . 57 में रस्ता
58
40
39
35
26वी
34
27/ए
3
4
5 00
53
18 00
58
38
00
10
00
00
84
00
00
38
84 00
22
71 00
02
02 00
40
13 00
10
31 00
00
48 00
86
92 00
05
10 00
07
34 00
43
96 00
03
93 00
08
39 00
96
05
15
00
71 00
13
55 00
05
59 00
39
15 00
06
89 00
27
85 00
88
00 00
22
39 00
27
95 00
34
09
00
05
01
00
12
18 00
57
98 00
03
19 00
55
08
52
00
96 00
47
18
00
02
77
11
42 00
00
36
09
09
60 00
00
36
48 00
00
10 00
08
04
00
20
02 4846
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2
27/बी
17) ब्राम्हणगाव (नीरंतर)
21/सी
22सी
20/सी
20/बी
19/सी
20/ए
21/ए
गट नं . 20 और गाव सीमा के बीच की नदी
जिल्हा: ठाणे मंडल/तेहसिल/तालुक: विक्रमगड
1) कुझे
गाव सीमा और गट नं . 553 के बीच में नदी
553पी
554
563/पी
563पी/1
568
573/1पी
573/1 पी
573/1पी
573/1पी'
578
579
584पी
586
588
589
590
गट नं . 590 में रस्ता
593
639
642
641
640
638
30
632
631
633
28/पी
26
गट नं . 30 और गाव सीमा के बीच का नाला
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) 3
4
5 00
04
23 00
16
38 00
42
00
00
03
25 00
10
17 00
87
06
00
14
49 00
04
44 00
14
78 राज्य: महाराष्ट्र
00
18
73
45
00
53 00
01
47 00
09
00 00
70
56
00
03
49 00
13
50 00
01
64 00
26
45 00
04
80 00
34
53 00
39
79 00
34
91 00
13
20 00
19
93 00
08
23 00
70
63
39 00
03
00
27
31 00
49
11
00
31
81 00
03
81 00
07
01 00
10
15
17
64
00
00
26
03
00
01
63 00
40
32
00
47
10 00
28
43 00
65
09 भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भागं' II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2 2) म्हसरोली
गाव सीमा और गट नं . 131/9 के बीच में नाला
131/9
131/12
17पी
29पी
98पी
118
20/2
108/2
108/3
18/1
18/2
16पी
130/1
15
130/2
115
40/76
3) शिळ
12
31
75
74
17//1
19
72
71
91/6
4) भोपोली
105/1
103
104
94
98/2पी
गट नं . 97 में रस्ता
96
80/बी
79
78/ए
81और डब्ल्यू/ 2
44
43
4847
5 3
4
00
74
06
00
20
76 00
78
24
00
64
34 00
54
02 00
12
90 00
13
09
54
00
00
00
22
98 00
39
00 00
21
83 00
21
82 00
00
33
00
65
29
54
37 00
00
01
12 00
16
00
:
02
76
20
00
00
15 00
34
38 00
68
10
12 00
83
00
00
68
51
00
57 00
57
03
00
00
90 00
16
49
51
00
69 00'
46
47 00
07
83 00
26
87 00
02
15 00
08
59 00
13
01 00
48
46
00
55
96 00
10
00
02
06
85
76 00
14
00
01
66 4848
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
99
5) तळवली
104
गट नं . 104 में रस्ता
गट नं . 104 में रस्ता
106
107
108
109
114
110
111
112
113
121
73
72
65
62
60
51
64
53
47
48
26
36
27
24
14
13
12
6) कोंडगाव
151/4ए
16/1
131/पी
96पी
95/1पी
130/3
130/5
130/6
107/पी
106
105
110
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3
4
5 00
49
11 00
57
17 00
02
19 00
03
43 00
39
82 00
47
01
14
00
54 00
15
47 00
71
48 00
04
66 00
08
94 00
10
37 00
13
54 00
51
42 00
02
04 00
04
45 00
11
19 00
96
43
14
00
53 00
00
10
16
00
08
12
00
53 00
15
78
02
00
50 00
01
08 00
03
07 00
74
44 00
48
26 00
97
46 00
40
90
34
00
04 00
50
49 00
02
15 01
41
86 00
07
02 00
07
18
33
73 00
00
22
64 00
07
45 00
05
87 00
31
42
19
06
00
00
20
59 4849
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2 1
112पी
6) कोंडगाव (नौरंतर)
113
157
128/6
70/1पी
70/2
155
12/1
115/पी
63/3
142
61/1
61/2
61/3
पाडा
59
57/1
57/2पी
123/1
56
गट नं . 123 में रस्ता
150/40-3 इक्यु
150/40-4 इक्यु
गट नं .4 डक्यू में नाला
115/2
127/2
123/2
123/5
123/6
63
7) विकशेत
44
33
25/4
34
35
2
3
1
4/3
4/5
4/6
4/7
5/1
1358Gl/2005-13
4
3
5 00
12
00
12
00
09 00
09
11
13
00
68 00
07
50 00
06
70 00
08
18 00
43
00 00
00
14 00
00
15 00
03
84 00
25
64 00
02
77 00
02
89 00
00
10
17 00
00
00
25
86 00
29
85 00
56
90 00
24
91 :
00
03
68 00
11
54 00
40
17
06
00
27
14 00
00
00
00
10
04
00
08 00
07
80 00
09
50 00
26
16
47 00
28
00
15
66 00
02
05
90 00
18
17 00
29
$7
00
65
83
39
00
10 00
01
00
11
63
24
02
00
01
02 00
00
60
06
81
26
00 4850
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
[PART II-SEC. 3(i)] 1
2
3
4
5 7) विळशेत (नीरंतर)
5/2
00
10
70
5/3
00
17
44
42/2
00
51
02
42/3
00
01
72
42/5
00
38
42/6
00
07
61
6
00
32
20
50
00
04
31
सर्वे नंबर 47 बीच में नाला
00
24
06
47/1ची
00
28
81
60/1
00
03
20
12ए
00
14
57
12वी
00
08
05
47/2
00
44
40
[फा. सं. एल-14014/41/2004- जी.पी. ]
एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 9th May, 2005
S. O. 1792.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, S.O. 3039 dated the 23rd November 2004 issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern / Southern Offshore of Goa and Structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited, the promoter company of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of District Thane in the State of Maharashtra by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited ;
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 10th January 2005;
And whereas objections received form the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;
And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government:
And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired, for laying the pipeline ;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests , on this date of publication of the declaration, in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited freefrom all encumbrances .
4851
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Schedule
District: Thane
Mandal /Thesil/Taluk : Wada
Village
SurveyNo./Sub-Division No.
2 1
19
1)Met
22P
25/C
25/D
25/E
26
39
147/B
2)Ghonsai
147 /A1
State: Maharashtra
Area to be acquired forROU Hectare
C-Are
Are
3
5
4
00
34
22
00
75
56
00
25
03
15
00
31 00
15
02
00
10
00
18
95 00
00
95
06
25
25
00
48 00
09
Road SH-35 in bet. Gat No. 147 & 171
171
145/A
177
176
175
141
140
138
142/P
30 00
22
23
00
00
00
21
18
75 00
47
61 00
05
00
07
58
02
01 00
59
01
00
60 00
04.
06
00
21
Nala in bet. Gat No. 138 & 83
83
80
85/A
85/B
87/A
90
91
93
53
52
96
50
49
51
11
04
05
00
97 00
18
83
08
00
89
07
00
77
08
00
17
17
00
57
17
00
10
09 00
01
84 00
77 00
00
15
16 00
20 00
08
82
16
00
12
00
80
25
00
00 4852
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2
48
2) Ghonsai ( Contd....)
12
13
19
20
21
43
40
38
509/B
33
37
36
35
34
509/A
508
526
3)Musarne
535
536
539/B
539/A
543
544
545
551
552
550
549
553
554
555
459
556/A
447
446/A
445
444/A
441/A
440
439/A
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 3
4
5 00
14
15 00
35
07
02 00
03
00
00
37 00
14
11
65 00
15
61 00
18
00
06
18
18 00
19
00
80
02
00
01
08
57 00
13
00
38
06
00
13
56 00
61
04
00
15
26 00
03
54 00
00
84 00
06
18 00
21
10 00
08
95 00
00
84
15
00
38
00
10 00
00
16
18 00
11
14
06
48 00
00
02
55 00
01
82
13
02 00
03
00
55 00
02
51
94 00
03
00
25
00
47 00
01
00
01
80 00
01
79 00
04
50 00
03
83 00
09
46 00
08
30 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाखे 24, 1927
1
2
438
3) Musame( Contd....)
562
563
385
328
327
322
324
66
256
255
254
71/B
250
221
224
223
227
222
220
216/D
216/C
216/B
219
216/A
217 /A
218
214/A
213
201
212
203
202
178
4) Chinchaghar
186
181
203
216
217
220
221
4853 3
5
4
66 00
02
73 00
20
01
00
40
56 00
28
00
11
35
17 00
17
00
21
30 00
15
88 00
32
83 00
04
78
09
64 00
00
10
37
37
00
54 00
01
53 00
14
09 00
07
02
00
04
13 00
41
02
00
04
26 00
05
98
10
00
81 00
09
93
05
68 00
00
05
57
47 00
05
57 00
05
00
05
93 00
21
37 00
03
69 00
48
96 00
02
63
00
00
10 00
38
17
00
02
37 00
11
55 00
07
04
00
43
50 00
67
01
00
24
13 00
44
08
00
13
15 4854
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
222
4) Chinchaghar ( Contd .... )
212/C
258/A
260
261
262
263
265
308
13/1
5) Vijayagad
10/4
10/2
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/9
5/5
5/3/1
5/1
5/2/1
Road inbet. Gat No. 5 & 6
6/14/1
6/12
6/7/1
6/6
6/4
[PART II SEC . 3( ii) ] 3
5
4
1
37
34
00
25 00
21
00
50
09
29 00
10
00
46
12
93
12
00
00
26
11
00
20
08
04
41 00
65 00
04
48 00
14
88
18
00
00
05
07
21 00
00
00
48
12
00
00
28
07
65 00
01
80 00
00
21
04
74 00
02
00
02
21
62 00
02
00
08
52
98 00
04
49 00
14
84 00
02
00
00
79 00
42
09
CartTrack in bet . Gat No. 6/6 & V.B
4/3
4/2
4/1
15/8
6) Dongaste
15/7A
15/7C
15/5
15/1A+4 00
10
00
19
00
00
00
00
49 00
06
97 00
00
09
86 00
06
43 00
04
00
54
09
10 00
02
Road in bet. Svy. No. 15/1 & 14/15
14/15
14/14
14/9A
17 00
04
00
06
95
24 00
02 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4855
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
14/9B
6) Dongaste(Contd....)
14/8
14/2/1
3/1
3/13C
3/7
3/9
3/11A
3/11B
3/11D
3/11E
3/5A
3/5B
3/5C
3
5
4
00
20
03
00
58
03
00
10
81 00
73
04
00
00
10
17
20 00
00
06
02
04 00
08
01
08 00
07
00 00
92
02
00
02
88 00
32
05
00
*05
50 00
03
00
Nala inbet.Svy. No. 3/5 & 4/6
4/6
4/4
5/8
5/5
5/4
37/6
5/3
5/2B
5/2C
36/1A
34/14
00
25
80 00
01
17 00
05
19 00
63
09
00
00
14
00
14
07
00
03
16 00
12
05
00
10
00
00
34
56 00
18
80 00
02
32
Road in bet. Svy. No. 34/14 & 35/6
35/6
35/9
35/4
35/5
35/3
196
7) Bilavali
195
197
194
187
186
184
183
181
13
00
72 00
03
80 00
13
02 00
00
33 00
00
37 00
05
30 00
08
58 00
19
57
00
12
40 00
80
07
00
00
15 00
00
99
01
32 00
00
04
08 4856
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
2
208
7) Bilavali (Contd .... )
202
203/B
206
205
204
237
239/B
238
249A
250/A
251
255
256
349
254
352
351
350
348
345
346
357
358
355
368
370
371
372
417
420
421
422
424
423
431
440
437
438
439
441
443
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 3
4
5 00
05
03
56 00
00
15 00
04
00
08
30 00
10
30 00
28
10
00
17
08
78 00
11
00
71
04
38 00
08
00
25
06
05
39 00
00
16
21 00
00
51 00
60
34
31 00
02
00
16
26 00
01
80 00
00
58 00
00
99 00
24
00
00
01
24
03
31 00
00
33
93 00
21
37 00
21
51 00
14
99 00
62
09
00
58
19
00
29
11 00
62
04
00
03
54 00
13
97 00
06
02
87 00
10
00
14
03 00
11
30 00
00
10 00
00
78
00 00
02
00
15
82 00
07
15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4857
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
444
7) Bilavali (Contd ....)
;
445
447A
448
449
461
469
466
468
465/A
465/C
464/A
463
481
480
479/2
494
764/1P
8) Biloshi
776P
22
21
20/1
19/C
19/A
27
13/2
63
61
56
60
3
5
4
00
01
00 00
49
00
00
37
19 00
03
86
54
05
00
99
02
00
45
27
80 00
03
00
06
93 00
66
23
03
21 00
00
49
18
00
26
90
67 00
05
05
59 00
00
78
23
29 00
47
22 00
59
47 00
51
03 00
18
42 00
44
00
43
15
00
02
43
00
64
28
00
03
36
17
50 00
00
23
89 00
08
16
01
24 00
06
31 00
40 00
03
Road inbet. Gat No. 63 & 64
64
97
65
96
80
81
82
136
138
193
1358 GI/2005-14
12 00
01
13
00
00
00
55
98
10
00
00
00
15
03
40 00
00
13、 .00 00
05
00
36
32
01
00
20
56 00 4858
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2
4
8) Biloshi ( Contd .... )
151
140
155
156
157
160
159
191
161
189
190
182
251
253
256
254
257
258
261
259
306
305
307
308
304
361
368
365/A
365/B
367
109
9) Khanivali
108
107
113
115
105
136
135
137
159
PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
5 3
4
64 00
03
10 00
16
66 00
02
10 00
00
72 00
20
87
09
00
05
30 00
40
50 00
00
23
04
80 00
05
21 00
05
00
39
08
00
04
57
05
03 00
00
12
55
01
84 00
00
12
28
00 00
02
00
15
71
29
20 00
00
10
00
20 00
40
00
59
09
93
05
00
00
17
49
81 00
15
35 00
32
62 00
16
00
40
05 00
99
08
00
00
48 00
08
24
74 00
19
17 00
05
00
10
01
72 00
19
00
20 00
19
68 00
07 00
14
74
36
00
06
44 00 [भाल II- खष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]
4859
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
158
(Contd....)
157
200
199
198
197
196
212
211
210
209
222
218
217
213
219
186
10)Ambiste-Bk
187
4
5 3
76 00
02
13
00
00
00
13
59 00
84
00
00
02
67 00
36
26 00
03
35 00
16
23 00
15
50 00
07
65 00
29
57 00
29
60
55'
46 00
00
05
03 00
74
01
06
00 00
00
00
10
17
00
49 00
02
53
Road inbet. V.B & Gat No. 187
185
188
189/A
189/B
193
163
194
197
198
251
250
247
253
246
245
244
243
242
321
322
325
324
66 00
04
04
29 00
17
00
85 00
13
36 00
09
28
67
00
94 00
54
16
86 00
00
00
04
19 00
00
36 00
13
93 00
00
69
85 00
08
00
00
10
06
71 00
00
09
06 00
19
49
98 00 00
10
00
69 00
10
06
03
15 00
72
12
00 4860
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
2 1
323
10) Ambiste- Bk ( Contd....)
320
329
471
470
460
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ⅱ) ] 3
5
4
00
93
09
00
32
18 00
23
28 00
13
11
00
11
43
00
10 00
Road SH 34 in bet. Gat No. 458 &
461
461
462
463
455
458
454
452
450
519
81
11)Ambiste-Kd
88
80
86
78
84.
77
76
74A
97
103
104
132
131
130
129
137
00
07
41 00
90
05
00
33
03
00
01
84 00
27
25
00
78
29
00
46
91
04 00
01
00
46
51 00
04
33 00
00
10
05
50
38 00
16
38 00
10
20
82 00
01
00
06
23
42 00
18
00
01
21 00
28
02
97 00
14
00
17
28
27 00
04
00
27
87
69 00
13
00
20
66 00
62
11
78
00
51
20
00
64
River in bet. Gat No. 137 & V.B
12) Kharivali
00
24
16
River in bet . V.B. & Svy . No. 137
137/1
137/2
137/3
142/4
142/5
00
15
00 00
14
50 00
14
79 00
17
80 00
20
20 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4861
भारत का राजपत्र: मई14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
142/7
12)Kharivali (Contd....)
142/8
142/9
139/1
139/4
143/2
3
5
4
00
17
00 00
16
80 00
16
78 00
46
11
00
02
52 00
23
30 00
06
86
In Bet.Svy. No. 117 & 98
98/5
98/7
98/8
113/1
113/2
99/1
99/2
105/2
78/11A
75/1
76/3
57/3
55/4
58/1
58/2
56/3/2
56/6A
266/1
266/3
265
264/8
Road in Svy. No. 267
286/3
286/4
287/2
328/3
328/5
290/1
290/2
327/1
327/2
3/2
3/4
3/5
3/6
00
19
83 00
04
20 00
33
00 00
40
09
00
09
39 00
02
50 00
14
38 00
07
38
05
00
44 00
20
74 00
14
27 00
17
46 00
20
50 00
00
40 00
04
62 00
14
10
36
00
55 00
12
20
06
00
02 00
02
12 00
46
02
03
00
78 00
02
60 00
05
17
01
75 00
00
29
70 00
30
90 00
09
60
75
20
00
30 00
06
00
47
06
00
43
15
00
00
25 00
20
00
00
01
89 4862
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
2 1
3/10
12) Kharivali (Contd....)
3/9
4/1
5/1
5/3
5/4B
320/10
144/8
144/9
117/4
117 /7A
117/8A
78/11B
78/2
78/3
78/6
78/8
78/9
267/1
267/2
267/3
267/6
267/9
267/10
10/2A
10/2B
60
13) Bhopivali
59
66
67
64/P
71
70/A
72
73
51
85
42
41
40
39
[ PART 11-SE . 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5
03 00
13
00
00
51
24
84 00
00
40
00
00
10
51 00
53
22
00
71
20
00
07
12
62 00
13
09
45 00
00
37
43
00
09
45 00
45
18
00
20
39
00
26
46 00
02
90 00
00
02
00
01
15 00
06
00
06 00
05
00
10
80 00
21
60 00
14
01 00
19
80 00
17
80 00
17
64 00
17
76 00
04
74 00
04
09 00
03
95
83 00
06
30 00
09
00
81
01
00
15
04
00
08
16 00
18
55 00
09
98 00
13
25 00
47
06
00
10
00
06
84 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4863
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
26
13) Bhopivali(Contd .... )
24
27
28
20
19
15
17
18
16
13
12
211
210
212
209
70/B
22
14)Mande
24/C
25/A
25/C
26/A
31
Road in Svy No 31 3
4
5 00
03
53
10 00
00
01
30 00
93 00
26
00
16
88 00
11
76 00
10
00
00
10
15 00
10
55 00
18
07
00
05
02 00
16
83 00
08
89 00
00
10 00
11
40
00
31
89 00
70
09
00
07
13 00
08
63
07
16 00
00
07
16 00
21
02 00
26
37 00
02
01 00
06
72
Nala inbet. Svy. No. 31 & 43
43
42
88
89
87
60
78
61/1
77
64
69
65
146P
15) Kalamkhand
150
149
00
23
99 00
30
91 00
48
48 00
19
59
27
00
99 00
10
00
00
78
99 00
00
10 00
09
58 00
04
29
32 00
36
00
57
75
16
00
86 00
31
60
00
74
04 4864
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
153 /A
15) Kalamkhand (Contd.... )
SH-35 in Svy.No. 153
Road in Svy.No. 153
170
169
174/A
175
[PART II-SEC 3 ( 0)
5 3
4
87 00
81
73 00
07
00
06
40 00
07
07
04
87 00
10 00
00
0
38
81 00
63
03
Road in Svy. No. 169 & 175
179
178
177
186
187
188
190
191
192
197P
238
193
194
195
231
196
78
16) Suponda
79/P
77
75 /A
75/B
72/A
71
67/B
69
66
141
Road in Gat No. 141
198
145/B
Nala in Gat No.198
176/A
173
00
19
24
3
90
20 00
95
99 00
07
00
11
92
14 00
17
09 00
17
00
21
00
44 00
11
46
31 00
00
21
38 00
58
37
63
26 00
69
86
00
10 00
00
05
64 00
53
18
58 00
38
00
10
00
00
00
84
38
00
84 00
22
71 00
02
02
00
40
13 00
10
31
00
00
48 00
86
92
05
00
10
07
00
34 00
43
96
93 00
03
00
08
39
05
96 00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4865
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2 1
172
16) Suponda (Contd....)
177
178
170
Road in Gat No.170
169/A
167/A
166
223
222/B
221
88
17) Brahmangaon
87
53
55
56
57
Road in Gat No.57
58
.40
39
35
26B
34
27/A
27/B
21/C
22C
20/C
20/B
19/C
20/A
21/A
3
4
5 00
71
15
00
13
55
59
05
00
39
15
89
06
00
27
85 00
00
66
00
22
39 00
27
95 00
34
09
00
01
05 00
12
18 00
57
98 00
03
19
55
00
08 00
52
96
47 00
18
00
02
77 00
11
42 00
36
09
00
09
60 00
36
48 00
00
10 00
08
04
00
20
02 00
04
23 00
16
38
42 00
00
00
03
25 00
10
17 00
87
06
00
14
49 00
04
44
14
00
78
River in bet. Gat No. 20 & V.B
District: Thane
Mandal /Thesil /Taluk : Vikramgad
State: Maharashtra
00
18
73
River in bet.V.B. & Gat No. 553
1) Kurze
553P
554
563/P
563P/1
1358 GI /2005-15
00
45
53 00
01
47
00 00
09
00
56
70.
4866
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
2
568
1) Kurze(Contd .... )
573/1P
573/19
573/1P
573/19
578
579
584P
586
588
589
590
Road in Gat No.590
693
639
642
641
640
638
30
632
631
633
28/P
26
Nala in bet. Gat No.30 & V. B. [ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5
49 00
03
13
50 00
00
01
64 00
26
45 00
04
80 00
34
53 00
79
39
00
34
91
20 00
13
93
19
00
23 00
08
70
63
00
00
03
39
31 00
27
49
11
00
00
31
81 00
03
81 00
07
01
15
10
00
17 00
64
00
03
26 00
63
01
32
00
40
47
10 00
43
28
00
65 00
09
74 00
06
Nala in bet.V.B. & Gat No.131/9
2) Mhasaroli
131/9
131/12
17P
29P
98P
118
20/2
108/2
108/3
18/1
18/2
16P
130/1
15
76 00
20
00
24
78
64
34 00
00
02
54
12.
00
90
13
00
09
54 00
00
98 00
22
00 00
39
83 00
21
82
21
00
00 00
33
29 00
65
37
54
00 भारत का राजपत्र : मई14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भान 11- वष्ठ 3(11)]
2
130/2
1)Mhasaroll (Contd....)
115
4A/76
3) Shil
12
31
75
74
17/A/1
19
72
71
91/6
4)Bhopoli
105/1
103
104.
94
98/2F
Road inGatNo.97
96
80/B
79
78/A
81& 2
44
43
99
5)Talavali
104
Road inGat No. 104
RoadinGatNo. 104
106
107
108
109
114
110
111
112
113
121
4867 3
4
5 00
01
12 00
00
16
76 02
20
00
00
15
34
38 00
00
10
68
12 00
83
00
00
68
51
57 00
57 00
03.
90
00
00
00
16
49
51
69 00
46
00
47 00
83
07
00
26
87
15 00
02
00
08
59 00
13
01
48 00
46
00
55
96 00
00
10 02
06
85 00
76
14
00
01
66
11 00
49
57
17 00
02
19 00
43 00
03
00
39
82
47
00
01
54
14
00
47 00
15
00
71
48 00
04
66
94 00
08
10
37 00
13
54 00
51
42 00 4868
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
2 1
73
5) Talavali (Contd .... )
72
65
62
60
51
64
53
47
48
26
36
27
24
14
13
12
151/4A
6) Kondgaon
16/1
131/P
96P
95/1P
130/3
130/5
130/6
107 / P
106
105
110
112P
113
157
128/6
70/1P
70/2
155
12/1
115/P
63/3
142
61/1
PART II-SE . 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
5 00
02
04 00
04
45 00
11
19 00
96
43 00
14
53 00
10
00 00
16
08 00
12
53 00
15
78 00
02
50 00
08
01
00
03
07 00
74
44 00
48
26 00
97
46
40
00
90 00
34
04
50
00
49 00
02
15 01
41
86
02 00
07
00
07
18
33
00
73 00
22
64 00
07
45
05
00
87
31
00
42 00
06
19 00
59
20
00
00
12
00
12
09 00
09
11 00
13
68 00
07
50 00
06
70 00
08
18 00
43
00 00
00
14 00
00
15 00
03
84 00
64
25 भारत काराजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
1
2
61/2
6) Kondgaon(Contd....)
61/3
Pada
59
57/1
57/2P
123/1
56
Road in Gat No.123
150/4A-3W
150/4A-4W
Nala in Gat No. 4W
115/2
127/2
123/2
123/5
123/6
63
7) Vilshet
44
33
25/4
34
35
2
3
1
4/3
4/5
4/6
4/7
5/1
5/2
5/3
42/2
42/3
42/5
42/6
6
50
Nala in Svy.No.47
47/1P
3
6
4
00
02
00
02
89 1.00
00
10 00
17
00
00
25
86 00
85
29
00
56
90 00
91
24
00
03
68 00
11
54
17 00
40
27 00
06
00
00
14 00
00
10 00
04
08
07
00
80 00
09
50 00
26
16 00
28
47
15
00
66
05 00
02
18
90 00
17 00
29
17
00
65 00
83
39
10 00
01
00
63
11
24
02
00
02
01
00
60 00
06
26
81 00
00
10
.70 00
17
44 00
51
02 00
01
72 00
00
38
61 00
07
32
20 00
31 00
04
24
06 00
81 00
28 [PART II-SEC. 3(0) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
4870
5
4
3
2
1
20
00
03
60/1
7) Vilshet (Contd ....)
57
14
00
12A
05
08
00
12B
40
00
44
47/2P
[F. No. L- 14014/41/2004-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 9 मई , 2005
का. आ. 1793.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेद्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेद्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ . 3210 तारीख 15दिसम्बर, 2004,2004, जामनगर - भोपाल और काकीनाडा- हैदराबाद - गोवा पाइप लाइन को आपस में जोडने के लिए गैस द्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमीटेड द्वारा एक पाइप लाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना के संलग्न अनूसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 31 जनवरी , 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया;
और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि में पाईपलाईन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाईप लाईन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;
और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में पाइप लाइन बिछाने के संबंध मे उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार मे निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गैस द्रान्सपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कंपनी लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4871
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
अनूसूची
जिला: वडोदरा
मंडल/तेहसिल/तालुक: पादरा
गाँव का नाम
राज्य : गुजरात
सर्वे नंबर/ब्लॉक नंबर
1
2
329-व
1) वनीली
341
342
340/ व
345
346
312
311
308
307
305
306
391
393
387
399/ अ
386/ व
386/ अ
385
384अ
794
2) सांपला
801
802
804
791/ अ
791 / व
789
788
783
785
738
819
820
821
879
822
878
आर.ओ.यु. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर
आर सि-आर 3
5
4
10
00
77
68 00
36
32
00
52 00
12
81 00
11
26
00
03
25
00
69
64
27
00
83 00
60
00 ,
22
00
60
02
00
94 00
16
87 00
40
42 00
00
40
12
62 00
00
09
14 00
24
21
02
00
00
10 00
27
00
00
50 00
21
86 00
14
15
23
00
67
21
98 00
00
11
19
01
00
45 00
54
09
19
50 00
00
06
85
13
44 00
00
34
03
04
24 00
00
20
09 00
09
93
4.2
19
00
11 00
01
00
09
55 4872
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
2
880
2) सांपला ( निरंतर ... )
877
881
876
874/ व
849
850
859
858
855
854
853
553
554
550
556
545
557
544
543
288
289
348
347
345
346
349
350
343
341
338
339
368
336
369
371
330
226
3) अभोर
220
221
219
218
217
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 3
4
5 00
00
50
33
00
95 00
24
00 00
15
04
55 00
39
16
16 00
99
22
00
66
09
00
09
65 00
25
99 00
07
36 00
03
43 00
00
40 00
74
23
00
00
21
58
00
40 00
00
12
52 00
12
83 00
17
81 00
12
83 00
16
50 00
42
34
00
40 00
00
60
32
00
00
40 00
20
50 00
00
40
40 00
00
00
59
01
00
15
62
27
59 00
13
00
88
16
38 00
00
20
30 00
34
89
62 00
01
00
08
14
00
04
16
02
40 00
00
53
19
00
00
47 00
21
54
15
81 00
40 00
00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4873
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
1
2
210
3)अभोर ( निरंतर ...)
211
57
56
58
59
60
61/
61/अ
63
27/ अप/ 1
62
26पी / 1
24/ पी 1
23
762
761
763
764
765
706
704
703
702
661
662
663
665/ अ
665/
666
655
653
554
555
557
558
559
560/ अ
605
606
609
633
610
611-
1358.GI/2005-16
4
3
5
24
00
49 00
09
74
02 00
08
07
40
13
00
94
09
21
00
67 00
66
24
00
39
78 00
49
93
34 00
01
22
00
32
04
73 00
01
00
98 00
03
54
00
40 00
37 00
01
04
43 00
35
26
13
32 00
21
25
00
00
30
44
50 00
03
13
50 00
12
00
90
90
04
00
08
60 00
00
21
98
87 00
13
76 00
13
78 00
14
74 00
35
37
27
00
44
16
00
03
76 00
33
22
00
32
31
00
36 00
03
42 00
13
16
00
66
06
08
00
90
28
00
19
00
00
61
08
00
08 00
09 4874
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAIŠAKHA24. 1927
1
2
613
3) अभोर ( निरंतर ...)
632
614
616/ क
615
627
806
4) कुराल
807
812
811
813
810
809
820
11
6
8
23
24
25
28
43
42
41
37
40
39
38
62
61
58
60
59
48/ अ
5)मासर
49/ ब
49/ अ
55/ अ
54
65
64
87
69
70
[PART II-SEC. 3(t)
4
3
00
81
04
00
38 00
11
17
41 00
03
21
00
32
38
85 00
67
00
02
89
48 00
11
13 00
01
01
56 00
00
17
76 од
21
83
18 00
83
00
85
87 00
28
71 00
24 00
18
12
59 00
17
10
00
18
87
17
93
01
88
00
14
00
74
07
08
71 00
00
00
07
43 00
02
43
22
00
86 00
10
83 00
10
38 00
12
01 00
01
32
18
00
38 00
10
84 00
20
94 00
00
87 00
20
80 00
16
85 00
28
62 00
37
06
00
17
00 00
13
54 00
10
69 -राष्ठ 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/पैसाक 24, 1927
1
2
71
72
375
376
376/
377
376
381
380
382
416
383
395
396
411
413
410
406
407
400
406
401
402
202
204
194
191/
192
185
63
64
66/
89
88
87
94
95
96
86
84
97
98
79
110
4875
4
3
5 00
04
18 00
00
03
14 00
00
10
00
45
05
00
00
00
12
53 00
09
72 00
13
24 00
06
76 00
46
04
03
00
44 00
00
51
14
03 00
14
00
86 00
20
23
16 00
05
00
09
37
33 00
11
00
10
88
00
00
42 00
01
67
13
00
46 00
86
05
43
21 00
07 00
57
00
08
52
72 00
00
00
01
30 00
17
37
04
00
96 00
17
99 00
06
09 00
27
08
00
26
40 00
00
06 00
29
10
00
00
24 00
02
62 00
01
27 00
00
33
19
00
57
06
00
81
02
00
49
07
05
00 4876
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
111
6) गामेठा ( निरंतर ...)
115
754
753
752
751
750 /
740
739
597
7) मजातन
598
596
592
599
602
563
560
561
562
559
545
548
546
547
543
542
619
624
625
634
635
631
640
641
642
644
645
646
648
241 / अ
8) करवडी
200
199
198
196
[PART II SEC . 3 (ii )]
5 3
4
00
81
00
41 00
23
12
13
00
10
31 00
13
00
52
13
00
37 00
45
68
00
04 00
00
27
12
01
00
20
14
91 00
00
00
61
11
13 00
03
78 00
17
02 00
62 00
23
03
00
85
15
46 00
04
84 00
20
68
03 00
00
24
00
89 00
00
08
03
00 00
00
63
32
25
00
29
05
72 00
00
17
08
60 00
23
18
91 00
10
00
13 00
33
14
00
72 00
00
11
45
29
00
70
02
00
51
01
00
15
00.
69 00
60
00
00
00
04
39 00
07
53 00
11
63 00
13
28 00
00
76 4877
भारत काराजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 T
197
३) करवडी ( निरंतर ...)
195
205
204
228
227
226
215/
225
216
170
169
164
168
165
845/ अ
9) चौकारी
684
685
829
828
827
828
824
823
822
821
820
819
816
812
810
809
805
803
802
801
795/ व
795/ अ
-796
794
1166
1167
1165
1172
4
3
5 00
17
7
00
64 00
21
00
37
92 00
14
00
17 00
00
90
11
00
07
06 00
08
41 00
12
35 00
24
25
50
39
00
00
12
47 00
62
27
00
04
05
21
58 00
00
37
28 00
10
01
00
10
86 00
09
56
07
44 00
00
02
66 00
05
69 00
11
92 00
06
93
74
03
00
30 00
00
14 00
04
25
10
00
52
01 00
00
18
00
71
17
33 00
16 00
17
37 00
07
00
06
53
14
00
08
28
55 00
00
50
09
00
26 00
14
76 00
00
41
46
02
00
34
19
00
79 00
00
82 4878
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[ PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) 1
2
3
4
5
1174
00
9) चौकारी (निरंतर ... )
13
70
1173
00
11
18
1175
00
98
39
1176
00
19
31
1177
00
01
57
1154
00
18
1185
00
04
38
[ फा. सं. एल -14014/ 35/2004 - जी.पी. ]
एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 9th May, 2005
S. O. 1793.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3210 dated 15th December , 2004, issued under sub- section(1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation natural gas through an interconnection between Jamnagar Bhopal and Kakinada Hydrabad - Goa Pipeline by Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;
And, whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public 31st January, 2005;
The objection received from the public to the laying of the Pipeline have been considered and dissolved by the Competent Authority;
And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laving the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1 ) of the Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest, on the date of publication of the declaration, in Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited free from all encumbrances .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4879
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
Schedule
MardarthealTaluk : PADRA
District: VADODARA
SurveyNo./Sub-Division No.
Name ofVillage
1
2
329-B
1) Darioli
341
342
340/B
345
346
312
311
308
307
305
306
391
393
387
399/A
386/B
386/A
385
384A
794
2) Sampla
801
802
804
791/A
791/B
789
788
783
785
738
819
820
821
879
822
State : GUJARAT
Area to be acquired for ROU
Are C-Are Hectare
4
3
5
10
77 00
00
36
68 00
32
52 00
12
81 00
11
26
25
00
03 00
64
69
00
83
27
00
60
00
00
22
60 00
02
94 00
16
87
40
42 00
00
00
40
62 00
12
00
09
14 00
24
21 00
02
00
27
10 00
00
50 00
21
00
86 00
15
14 00
67
23
21
00
98 00
11
19 00
45
01
00
54
09 00
19
50 00
06
85 00
13
44 00
34
03 00
24
04
20
00
09 00
09
93 00
19
42
11 00
01 4880
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24,1927
1
2
878
2) Sampla (Contd .... )
880
877
881
876
874/B
849
850
859
858
855
854
853
553
554
550
556
545
557
544
543
288
289
348
347
345
346
349
350
344
343
341
338
339
368
336
369
371
330
226
3) ABHOR
220
221
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] 3
4
5 00
09
55
00
00
50 00
33
95 00
24
00 00
04
15
39
55 00
00
16
16 00
22
99 00
66
09
00
65 00
25
99
07
36 00
00
43
03
00
00
40 00
23
74 00
21
58 00
00
40
12
00
52 00
12
83 00
17
81
83 00
12
00
16
50
34
42 00
00
00
40 00
32
60 00
00
40 00
20
50 00
00
40 00
00
40
01
00
59 00
15
62 00
27
59
13
88 00
00
38
16
00
20
30 00
34
89 00
62
01
00
14
08 00
04
16 00
40
02
00
53
19 00
00
47 4881
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
219
3) ABHOR ( Contd....)
218
217
210
211
57
56
58
59
60
61/B
61/A
63
27 A/P1
62
26P/1
24/P1
23
762
761
763
764
765
706
704
703
702
661
662.
663
665/A
665/B
666
655
653
554
555
557
558
559
560/A
605
1358GI /2005-17
3
4
5 00
21
54 00
15
81 00
00
40
24
49 00
00
09
74 00
08
02 00
13
40 00
09
94 00
21
67 00
24
66 00
39
78 00
49
93 00
01
34 00
22
32 00
04
73 00
01
98 00
03
54 00
00
40 00
01
37 00
43
04
00
35
26 00
32
13
00
25
21 00
30
44 00
03
50 00
13
50
12
00
90 00
90
04
00
08
60 00
21
98 00
13
87
13
76 00
78 00
14
35
00
74
37 00
27
00
16
44 00
03
76
33 00
22
32 00
31
36 00
03
00
13
42 00
16
66 4882
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2
606
3 ) ABHOR ( Contd .... )
609
633
610
611
613
632
614
616/C
615
627
806
4) KURAL
807
812
811
813
810
809
820
11
9
6
8
23
24
25
26
43
42
41
37
40
39
38
62
61
58
60
59
MASAR
48/A
49/B
49/A
Pt 11-S ( ) } 3
4
5 00
08
06 00
28
90 00
19
00
00
61
08
00
09
08 00
04
81 00
09
39 00
11
17 00
00
41 00
21
03 00
32
36
07
00
85 00
02
69 00
11
48 00
01
13 00
01
50
76
17
00
00
21
83 00
14
18
03
00
65
67
29
00
00
02
71 00
24
16
00
12
59 00
10
17 00
87
18
00
17
93 00
00
01 00
14
74 00
08
07
00
71 00
43 00
07
00
02
43
86 00
22
00
83
10
00
10
38 00
12
01
01
00
32 00
38
18
00
10
84
20
94 00
87 00
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
1
2
55/A
5) MASAR ( Contd .... )
54
65
64
67
69
70
71
72
375
6) GAMETHA
376
376/B
377
378
381
380
382
416
383
395
396
411
413
410
408
407
400
406
401
402
202
204
194
191/A
192
185
63
64
66/B
89
88
87
4883
4
3
5 00
20
80 00
16
85
28
00
62
06
00
37 00
17
00
13
00
54 00.
10
69 00
04
18
00
00
03 00
00
14 00
10
45 00
00
05 00
12
53 00
72
09
00
24
13
00
06
76 00
04
46 00
03
44
00
51 00
00
14
03 00
14
86 00
23
20
00
05
16 00
09:
37 00
33
11
00
10
88 00
00
42 00
01
67 00
13
46 00
05
86 00
21
43
00
07
57
00
52
08
00
00
72
01
30 00
17 . 37 00
00
04
96 00
17
99 00
08
09
27 00
08
00
26
40 00
00
06.
4884
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2
94
6) GAMETHA ( Contd ....)
95
96
86
84
97
98
79
110
111
115
754
753
752
751
750/B
740
739
597
7) MAJATAN
598
596
592
599
602
563
560
561
562
559
545
548
546
547
543
542
619
624
25
634
635
631
640
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
4
3
5 00
10
29 00
00
24 00
02
62
01
00
27
33 00
00
00
57
19
00
81
06
00
02
49
07 00
05
00
00
61
23
41 00
13
00
12
31 00
10
52 00
13
00
13
37 00
45
68 00
00
04 00
12
27
01
00
20 00
14
91 00
61
00
11
00
13 00
78
03
00
17
02 00
23
62
85 00
03
00
46
15
00
84
04
00
20
68 00
00
03 00
24
89 00
00
08
03
00 00
00
32
63 00
25
29
72 00
05
00
17
08
60 00
23
00
91
18
00
13
10
00
33
14 00
72
00 4885
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]
1
2
641
7) MAJATAN (Contd ....)
642
644
645
646
648
241 /A
8) KARKHADI
200
199
198
196
197
195
205
204
228
227
226
215/B
225
216
170
169
164
168
165
845/A
9) CHOKARI
684
685.
829
828
827
826
824
823
822
821
820
819
816
812
810
3
5
4
11
00
45
29
00.
70 00
02
51 00
01
15 00
00
69 00
00
60 00
04
39 00
07
53 00
11
63
13
28 00
76 00
00
00
17
17
64 00
00
21
37 00
00
14
92
17 00
00
00
11
90 00
07
06 00
08
41 00
12
35 00
24
25 00
39
50 00
12
47 00
27
62 00
04
05 00
21
58 00
37
28
01
00
10
10
00
86
09
56 00
00
07
44 00
02
66 00
05
69 00
11
92 00
06
93 00
03
74 00
30
00:
14 00
00
00
04
25 00
10
52
00
00
01 00
18
71 4886
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
809
00
17
33 9) CHOKARI (Contd....)
805
00
17
16
803
00
07
37
802
00
06
53
801
00
08
14
00
28
795/B
55
795/A
00
09
50
796
00
00
26
794
76
00
14
1166
41
46
00
1167
00
34
02
1165
00
19
79
1172
00
82
00
1174
00
70
13
1173
00
11
18
1175
00
06
39
1176
00
31
19
1177
00
57
01
1154
00
19
55
1185
00
04
38
[F. No. L-14014/35/2004-G.P. ]
S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2005
का. आ. 1794.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोनी (पुणे ) से पकनी (सोलापुर) तक हज़ारवाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005/ वैशाख 24 , 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4887 के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एम. वी . चिटनिस , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई- पुणे पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मेगा सेंटर , मगरपट्टा , एम अॅन्ड एन विंग , हादापसर-411 028 (पुणे जिला) , महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची तालूका : पुरंदर
राज्य : महाराष्ट्र
जिला : पुणे
गाव का नाम
सर्वे नंबर
गट नंबर कम सं.
4 1
2
3
1 सोनोरी
143
98
96
248
399
370 2 वनपुरी
355
352 3 कुंभारवलण
108
108
109
111 4 खलद
1395
735
732
726
723
718 5 शिवरी
1036
833
638(पै) 6 पांगारे
589
590
596
594
क्षेत्रफल
एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर
उप-खण्ड सं.
5
6 7
8 00 21
26 00 04
08 00 01
14
75 00 02
59 00 29
कुल
82 00
26
04
90 00 08
99
15 कुल
00 14
ब/6
00
13
09
ब/10
00 05 46 00 08
56
02 00 06
00 29
17 कुल
03
00
98
04 00 06
63 00 04
00 02
36 00 02
49 00 02
52
02 00 22
कुल
00 02
96 00 06
34
68 00 03
कुल
00 12
98 00 18
28
30 00 68
00 16
08
61 00. 06
27 01 09
कुल
गट नंबर 44 में
7 शिंदेवाडी
58 00 00
अस्फालटेड रास्ता
4888
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
तालूका : पुरंदर
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र
जिला : पुणे
सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल
गट नंबर
गाव का नाम
कम सं.
2
4 1
3
44 7 शिंदेवाडी (निरंतर)
88
87
एयर वर्ग मीटर हेक्टर
उप -खण्ड सं.
6 7
8 5
00 21
74
23 00 52
52 00 49
गट नंबर 87 में
72 00 01
मेटल्ड रास्ता
}
81
79
78
63
64
65
66
67
57-
69
97 00 20
54
09
00
33
10
00
47
15
00
31 00 02
04
61 00
00
18
09
31 00 35
07 00 03
24
01
00
गट नंबर 67 और
02
28 00
57 के बीच में
अस्फालटेड रास्ता
55
46
56
7
5
6
8
174
175
133
139
182
148
142
143
141
153 8 खेंगरेवाडी
156
157
154
155
158
41
06
00
26
44 00
20
60 00 11
39 00 00
71 00 15
99 00 07
06 00 21
94 00 03
68 00 14
14
90 00
06
27 00
97 00 12
32 00 14
73 00 20
08 00 09
79 04 26
कुल
31
00 01
35
00 03
20
53
00 07
90
00 02
41
00 06 4889
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
तालूका : पुरंदर
राज्य : महाराष्ट्र
जिला: पुणे
सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल
गट नंबर
गाव का नाम
कम सं.
2
4 1
3
159 8 खेंगरेवाडी (निरंतर)
160 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप-खण्ड सं.
6 7
5
8
20
20
गट नंबर 170 में
42
00 02
मेटल्ड रास्ता
170
168
72
181
186
182
183
185
184
2138 9. परिंचे
2150
2151
2152
2155
2154
2156
2157
2153
2165
2164
2163
2162
2161
2160
2159
2206
2209
2212
2225
2260
2238
2303 1358 GI /2005-18
1
}
00 28
81
20
71
00 07
00 04
42
00 04
95
02
00 04
21
00 09
00 00
20
23 00 04
27 कुल
00 88
00 01
46
72 00 03
66 00 08
00 03
54
37 0006
51 00 12
96 00 04
51
07 00 07
00 05
24 00 04 89
09 00 04
14 00 01
62 00 06
81 00 04
00 06
10 00 02
82 00 03
31
25 00 10
00 04
89 00 16
67
64
06
00
94 00 09 4890
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] राज्य : महाराष्ट्र
जिला: पुणे
तालूका : पुरंदर
सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल
गट नंबर
गाव का नाम
कम सं.
2
3
4 1
2356 9 परिंचे (निरंतर)
2571
2643
2642
2626
2627
2628
2639
2738
2732
2733
2734
3109
3136 10 हरणी
79
11
923
891
893
674
718 11 वीर
1789
1796
1797
1804
1824
1825 मांडकी
1480
1306
1308
940
1129 13 जेजुर
1123
1118 हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर उप -खण्ड सं.
7
5
6
8
00 06
54
00 06
52
00 01
98
00 02
68
00 01
31
00. 01
11
12
00 01
00 05
25
57
00 01
00 13
65
04
47
00
20
00 05
23
00 73
43
02 61
27 कुल
60
00 35
18
94
00
00 07
34
00 05
33
00 01
38 कुल
77
00 50
63
00 04
16
00 02
53
00 01
00 05
96
00 16
48
96
00 12
00 43
72 कुल
00 05
80
95
00 01
09
00 12
19
03
00 20
कुल
61
00 01
77
00 04
00 06
24 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भास्त का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
तालूका: पुरंदर
4891
जिला: पुणे
गाव का नाम
सर्वे नंबर
गट नंबर कम सं.
1
2
3
4
1116 13 जेजुर (निरंतर)
1000
851
852
576
597
593
594
595
579
575 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र
क्षेत्रफल
उप -खण्ड ।
हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर सं.
5
6 7
8 00 07
87
03 57 00
06
42 00
00 02
66 00 06
73
75 00 19
00 01
02
61
72 00. 00
47
14
00
58 कुल
00 77
02 [फा. सं. आर-31015/25/2004- ओ.आर-|| ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 10th May, 2005
S. O. 1794.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Loni (Pune) to Pakni (Solapur) via Hazarwadi in the State of Maharashtra , an extension pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule, may , within twenty one days from the date on which : copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri M.V.Chitnis , Competent Authority , Mumbai -Pune Pipeline Extension Project , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , Mega Center , Magarpatta - M & N Wing , Hadapsar - 411028, Pune District , Maharashtra .
4892
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24. 1927
SCHEDULE
State : MAHARASHTRA
District: PUNE
Taluka : PURANDHAR
Area
GatNo.
Survey No.
Sr. No.
Sub - Division No.
Are
Hectare
Sq.mt Nameof the Village
2
4
6
1
3
5
7 8
21 26
143
00
1 SONORI
98
00 04 08
00 01 14
96
00 00 75
248
02 59
00
399
00 29 82
Total
00 04 26
370
2 VANPURI
355
00 00 90
352
00
99
08
14 15
Total
00
108
00 09 13
B/6
3 KUMBHARVALAN
108
00
B/10
05 46
109
00 08 56
00
111
06 02
29 17
00
Total
4 KHALAD
00
98
1395
03
735
00 06 04
732
00 04 63
726
00 02 36
723
00 02 49
718
00 02 52
00 22 02
Total
5 SHIVARI
00
1036
02 96
00
833
06 34
03 68
00
638(P)
00 12 98
Total
00
6 PANGARE
589
18 28
00 68 30
590
596
00 16 08
594
00 06 61
01 09 27
Total
00
00
7 SHINDEWADI
58
Asphalted Road
in Gat No. 44
}
74
44
21
00
00
52 23
88
00 49 52
87 4893
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Taluka : PURANDHAR
State : MAHARASHTRA
District : PUNE
GatNo.
Survey No.
Sr. No.
Nameofthe Village
1
3
2
4 7 SHINDEWADI ( Contd . )
Area
Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt
6
5
7 8
00
01 72
Metalled Road in
GatNo. 87
81
79
78
63
64
65
66
67
57
69
00 20 97
00 09 54
00 10 33
00 15 47
00
31
02
00 04 61
00
09 18
00
35 31/
00
03 07
00
01 24
00
02 28
Asphalted Road
in between Gat
No. 67 & 57
55
46
56
7
5
6
8
174
175
133
139
182
148
142
143
141 8 KHENGREWADI
153
156
157
154
155
158
00 06 41
00 26 44
00 00 20
00 11 60
100 00 39
00 15 71
00 07 99
00 21 06
00
03 94
00
14 68
00
14 90
06 27
00
00
12 97
00 14 32
00 20 73
00 09 08
26 79-
04
Total
00
01 31
03 35
00
00
00 20
00
07 53
00 02 90
00 06 41 4894
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
State : MAHARASHTRA Taluka : PURANDHAR
District : PUNE
Area
Gat No.
Survey No.
Sr. No.
Sub - Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt Name of the Village
6
4
1
2
3
7 8
5
00
00 20
159
8 KHENGREWADI ( Contd .)
00 20
160
00
00
02 42
Metalled Road in
GatNo. 170
}
170
00
28 81
00 20
168
00
72
00
07 71
00
04 42
181
00
04 95
186
00
04 02
182
00 09 21
183
00 00 20
185
00
04 23
184
00 88 27
Total
00 01 46
2138
9 PARINCHE
03 72
00
2150
00 08 66
2151
00 03 54
2152
00 06 37
2155
00 12 51
2154
04 96
00
2156
00 00 51
2157
07 07
00
2153
05 24
00
2165
00 04 89
2164
00 04 09
2163
00 01 14
2162
00 06 62
2161
00 04 81
2160
00 06 10
2159
00 02 82
2206
00 03 31
2209
00 10 25
2212
00 04 89
2225
16 67
00
2260
00 06 64
2238
00 09 94
2303 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4895
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24; 1927
District : PUNE
Taluka : PURANDHAR
GatNo.
Survey No.
Sr. No.
Nameof the Village
4 1
2
3
2356 9 PARINCHE ( Contd. )
2571
2643
2642
2626
-2627
2628
2639
2738
2732
2733
2734
3109
3136
79 10 HARNI
11
923
891
893
674
718
1789 11 VIR
1796
1.797
1804
1824
1825
1480 12MANDKI
1306
1308
940
1129 13 JEUR
1123
1118 State : MAHARASHTRA
Area
Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt 5
6
7 8
00 06 54
00 06 52
00 01 98
00 02 68
01 31
00
00 01 11
00 01 12
00 05 25
00 01 57
13 65
00
00 04 47
00 00 20
00 05 23
00 73 43
02 61 27 Total
00 00 60
35 18
00
00 00 94
00 05 34
00 00 33
00 01 38
50 77
00
Total
00 04 63
00 02 16
00 01 53
00 05 96
00 16 48
00 12 96
00 43 72 Total
00 05 80
00 00 95
00 01 09
00 12 19
00 20 03 Total
00 01 61
00. 04 77
00 06 24 4896
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
Taluka : PURANDHAR
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
District : PUNE
GatNo.
Survey No.
Sr. No.
Nameofthe Village
4 1
2
3
1116 13 JEUR ( Contd . )
1000
851
852
576
597
593
594
595
579
575 State : MAHARASHTRA
Area
Sub-Division No. Hectare Are Sq.mt
6
7 8 5
00 07 87
03 57
00
00 06 42
00 02 66
00 06 73
00 19 75
01 02
00
00 00 61
00 72
00
00 00 47
00 14 58
00 77 02 Total
[No. R - 31015/25/2004- O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 10 मई , 2005
का. आ. 1795.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का. आ. 156 दिनांक 11.01.2005 द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर, ब्यावर से चित्तौड़गढ़ तक पैट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए " सिद्धपुर- सांगानेर पाइपलाइन से चित्तौड़गढ़ तक ब्रान्च लाईन " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु एक शाखा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये उक्त अधिसूचना में विनिर्दिष्ट तहसील मांडल , जिला भीलवाड़ा , राजस्थान राज्य की भूमि अधिसूचित की थी ।
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 02.02.2005 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी । और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी , राजस्थान , ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।
अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 4897
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
अनुसूची
तहसील: मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
एयर
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
3
4
2
5 1
0
03
1188
90 हिसणियां
0
36
50
1187
0
05
1200
10
0
1214
05
80
0
02
1216
30
0
09
1213
60
0
00
1222
30
0
1225
03
40
0
1224
08
90
0
09
1235
20
0
.00
20
1247
0
09
1236
50
0
1242
04
50
0
12
1241
50
0
1239
01
80
0
06
70
1317
0
00
1,315
60
07
0
1316
50
0
1325
11
80
0
1326
00
80
01
0
20
1327
0
1309
08
70
0
04
10
2026/1310
0
20
16
1981/1300
0
1300
11
40
0
20
70
1302
0
20
1786
22
0
10
1823
60
0
00
60
1824
0
10
1822
20 1358Gl/2005-19 4898
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART 11-S . 3 ( ii)] तहसील : मांडल
राज्य: राजस्थान
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
1
2
3
4
5
0
08
90
1839
20
0
1836
00
0
10
10
1850
00
20
1838
0
0
05
1851
40
0
04
00
1852
1847
0
11
40
0
09
30
1899
20
0
00
1903
1900
0
02
90
0
09
1902
80
0
60
1930
05
0
16
10
1923
0
10
70
1919
0
00
20
1925
0
07
40
1918
0
00
20
1914मिन
0
00
30
1965
0
00
20
1967
0
17
30
2057/1989
70
0
01
1968
0
03
70
104
सोदानपुरा
0
08
70
103
10
0
01
110
102
0
00
30
0
09
30
111
0
02
90
116
1.0
115
0
06
0
00
50
504/124मिन
122
0
01
50
10
21
0
08
0
506/124मिन
05
30 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4899
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
तहसील : मांडल
राज्य: राजस्थान
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
खसरा सख्ख्या गांव का नाम
1
2 क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
एयर वर्ग मीटर
4
3
5
0
05
507/126
128
140/1
142
40
0
16
50
0
12
90
0
00
20
0
140मिन
139
141
152
246
295
296
294 09
40
0
04
70
0
05
50
0
00
20
0
02
10
0
01
00
0
30
00
0
10
20
0
00
20
459/283
0
08
10
283मिन
0
453/283
282
275
274
276
277
273 03
50
0
01
10
0
05
00
00
90
0
04
60
0
00
60
0
04
60
0
04
20
255मिन
270
258/1 0
10
10
0
00
20
0
258मिन
04
30
0
00
326मिन
268
267
266
327
234
329
20
0
09
90
0
02
80
0
00
20
0
03
90
0
00
60
0.
00
20 4900
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
हेक्टेयर
एयर वर्ग मीटर 1
2
3
4
5
328
0
02
70
01
330
0
50
233
0
06
10
0
02
232
00
392/231/1
0
10
60
392/231/2
392/231 मिन
393/231/1
0
07
50
393/231 मिन
0
00
230
20
0
16
00
231/1
0
218
12
50
217
0
08
70
216
0
09
00
215
0
15
70
0
214
04
50
0
12
192
60
0
10
191
40
0
02
190
90
0
20
438/188
60
0
19
1344
40 भगवानपुरा
0
01
4767/1345
00
0
1345
00
20
0
15
00
1354
0
14
1353
70
0
03
1359
60
0
14
1360
00
0
1349
15
70
0
00
1361
30
2
0
24
60
0
12
1364
00
0
10
1366
70 4901
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ].
तहसील : मांडल
राज्य: राजस्थान
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा संख्या.
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
2
5
3
0
10
50
1367मिन
0
05
40
1367/1
26
0
20
1466
0
01
20
1439
0
03
80
4878/1429
0
06
1525
30
0
20
1524
16
0
19
1612
50
06
0
10
1611
0
02
1610
30
0
30
1626
13
0
00
20
1627
0
00
4780/1599
20
23
0
80
4928/1598
0
02.
20
1598
20
0
11
1597
0
06
20
1593
06
40
1594
0
27
0
00-
1568
00
0
20
1998
0
10
80
1999
0
01
50
4770/2000
0
22
00
2000
0
08
70
2001
0
00
20
2002
0
00
2003
13
0
04
20
4759/2080
0
60
15
2080
0
00
20
2087
0
00
40
4880/2103
0
00
90
5170/2103
0
05
90
2088 4902
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5 1
2
3
0
05
90
5188/2089
0
02
70
2089
16
50
0
2090
0
01
20
2067
0
2093
01
80
0
00
20
2094
0
02
2092
50
0
30
03
2191
0
09
00
2192
00
0
80
2204
70
0
00
2193
0
08
10
2194
0
0.2
40
2205
0
02
2200
80
80
0
06
2195
0
04
80
2199
20
0
06
2198
0
00
20
2214
0
01
40
2371
0
04
60
2368
0
00
40
2367
0
06
60
2369
80
0
13
2370
0
12
10
2360
0
20
01
2358
0
08
70
2357
0
20
00
2356
0
02
10
2355
0
10
00
2354
0
01
90
2351
0
16
10
2350
0
11
80
2417 4903.
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
गांव का नाम
खसरा संख्या
1
2
2 सूरजपुरा
1
4
5
775/6
8
7
17
154
153
184
185
188
187
181
180
196
205
206
207
210
308
307
306
304
305
302
301
295
354
294
292 राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 3
4
5
0
01
90
0
00
80
0
04
10
0
02
20
0
14
50
0
01
00
0
32
00
0
08
70
0
05
20
0
00
40
0
07
40
0
15
50
10
0
30
0
01
70
02
30
0
0
03
50
0
01
10
0
11
7.0
0
05
30
0
11
40
0
06
00
13
20
0
04
90
0
03
60
0
00
20
0
03
30
0
03
30
0
07
40
0
00
80
0
00
70
0
03
40
0
05
90 [PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] 4904
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
1
2
3
5
0
03
293
20
0
02
10
733/284
02
284
0
40
0
00
20
286
02
282
0
30
0
02
285
70
0
02
40
281
0
280
01
20
278
00
20
0
0
279
03
30
0
04
20
380
16
0
00
20
0
300
00
20
0
20
00
718
भीमड़ियास
0
719
01
20
0
720
06
10
0
21
722
10
0
00
80
723
0
04
724
90
0
02
725
20
0
11
00
729
0
10
40
733
01
00
741
0
0
01
30
739
0
740
11
30
0
00
744
20
06
0
30
745
0
757
05
60
0
00
758
20
0
756
10
70
0
760
02
30
0
761
06
00 4905 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
तहसील मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा संख्या
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
2
3
4
1
5
0
883
09
40
886
0
02
00
0
885
05
30
0
06
884
70
0
877
10
80
875
07
0
70
0
869
00
20
870
0
08
00
0
03
871
40
0
873
00
30
847
0
07
90
0
846
80
03
0
02
60
845
0
00
1480/846
40
0
70
834
07
0
844
02
10
07
0
00
835
0
20
00
836
0
01
70
832
0
05
80
831
0
10
80
830
0
08
40
1522/1022
0
00
20
1014
0
04
00
1021
0
10
80
1018
0
10
18
1020
0
07
40
1138
02
70
0
1162
0
00
20
11
राजपुरा
0
10
80
12
40
0
21
04
17
0
70
17
1358 GI / 2005-20 4906
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील : मांडल
राज्य: राजस्थान
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा संख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
1
2
3
4
5
19
0
01
30
0
02
18
70
0
03
20
90
0
19
12
40 योबकाखेड़ा
0
16
00
70
0
183/20
39
50
0
00
15/1
60
25
0
15/2
60
07
0
40
27 .
0
14
28
30
30
0
00
40
0
31
01
10
0
32
20
11
0
33
09
80
12
104
0
60
0
115
30
29
0
07
114
40
0
09
70
174/114
0
04
50
189/110
0
11
40
190/148
16
20
0
320
याबोला
0
00
40
343
0
70
342
03
0
341
06
30
0
08
321
00
0
313
03
40
17
312
0
20
0
14
40
311:
0
12
310
20
309
0
28
80
0
324
20
04
0
325
00
80 4907
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
हेक्टेयर. एयर वर्ग मीटर 1
4
2
3
5
0
06
865
60
0
08
90
1237/868
0
875
18
50
0
876
13
70
0
10
80
1220/876
904
0
08
50
903
0
08
10
0
08
60
902
60
0
1193/902
06
0
40
899
00
0
20
906
40
0
11
60
895
00
20
894
0.
05
20
0
937
04
0
30
908.
0
60
12
909
05
20
0
910
0
13
911
00
11
0
60
913
23
925
0
90
0
920
39
00
01
0
1127
8.0
0
17
60
297
भालड़ीखेड़ा
09
300
0
00
0
298
00
08
0
11
00
301
0
07
10
304मिन
0
07
10
338/1
02
0
00
338मिन
0
337
02
70
0
403
05
90
0
404
02
00 4908
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
PARI 11-SFC. 3 (ii) ] तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
एयर
4
5 1
3
2
0
01
20
402
0
08
400
90
20
0
00
407
0
00
30
399
0
08
60
408
406
0
00
90
0
05
10
419
0
410
06
00
0
16
10
418
0
03
417
50
653
0
30
10
0
13
00
625
00
624
0
20
15
627
0
60
00
0
20
633
0
01
40
632
0
631
30
40
0
630
10
01
02
0
638
30
0
16
70
2855/1320
भादू
0
26
30
2850/1320
17
0
10
2901/1320
16
0
70
2985/1320
0
03
50
2984/1320
0
40
2982/1320
20
0
15
20
1298
0
1308
00
60
0
04
20
1299
0
60
07
1300
0
1301
02
00
0
80
18
19
02
0
00
19 4909
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
राज्य: राजस्थान
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
तहसील : माइल
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सख्या
गांव का नाम
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
5
3
4
2
1
0
00
80
158
0
10
10
159
00
20
0
155
07
0
10
161
00
0
20
162/1
70
09
0
163
0
01
50
165
09
0
00
170
03
0
80
169
0
03
90
168
02
20
0
167
0
00
50
199
0
30
23
480
07
40
0
477
0
11
70
476
00
20
0
475
02
0
80
518
0
00
30
523
10
0
80
524
30
0
01 .
5,26
06
0
70
527
0
02
90
529
07
0
20
573
13
0
40
572
0
90
08
571
04
50
0
576
0
20
08
567
0
60
11
566
20
00
0
613
0
03
00
614
20
0
00
612
07
10 .
615 4910
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
एयर
1
4
2
3
5
0
09
50
616
627
0
08
90
0
03
617
80
0
09
625
00
622
0
20
00
0
623
00
20
0
00
20
630
0
624
04
80
631
0
07
70
00
0
40
731
00
729
0
20
0
14
735
20
777
0
16
30
02
778
0
70
0
00
780
18
0
00
20
783
0
04
50
784
0
01
786
90
0
20
785
09
00
790
0
20
0
791
13
90
0
03
10
792
0
09
70
793
16
797
40
0
0
796-
11
20
0
795
03
10
06
60
0
2934/704
0
04
2862/2290
20
0
06
50
2821/2290
0
10
80
2914/2290
0
23
00
2916/2290
0
43
40
2926/2290
4911
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य : राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
3
4
1
2
5
0
19
80
2840/2290
0
3.8
2837/2290
90
0
30
10
2853/2290
0
30
24
2924/2290
0
07
50
2292मिन
0
12
2834/2292
90
11
20
0
2684/2292
02
0
70
1806
घोड़ास
0
18
1807
40
0
07
30
1809
0
04
60
1810
1803
0
11
10
0
00
2073/1
40
0
00
40
2128
0
05
90
2133
0
08
60
2134
0
00
70
2136
0
12
2135
40
0
11
20
2149
0
00
20
2148
10
0
40
2155
0
00
20
2161/1
0
21.62
11
70
0
00
50
2178
2177
0
04
70
0
07
2176
80
0
00
20
2175
0
2173
10
70
0
05
2216
60
0
01
2218
00
0
2217
06
10
0
00
60
2274/1
4912
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एयर
4
5
3
1
2
0
04
80
2274/2
0
00
90
2288
0
60
2289
02
0
06
20
2291
07
20
2302
0
0
01
00
2303
06
10
0
2318
0
2317
03
80
0
10
09
2319
0
02
2320
50
0
04
40
2321
0
01
80
2334/1
0
00
04
2333
0
05
80
2332
0
70
2348/1
04
0
00
20
2348/2
0
05
40
2349
0
09
50
2350
0
01
00
2358
0
00
30
2352
0
08
20
2351
0
01
40
153
पीयास
0
00
20
152
0
28
80
154
0
07
80
155
0
108
09
90
0
09
60
107
0
00
113
50
0
02
80
112
56
0
01
60
0
10
20
57
0
62
14
40 4913
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (日 ) ]
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा संख्या
गांव का नाम
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1
2
3
4
5
0.
61
11
20
0
590
13 50
0
12
593
50
0
04
594
70
0
596
18
60
693
0
01
30
604
0
06
30
689
0
07
00
0
688
09
30
0
00
687
20
682
0
00
80
0
06
70
683
0
10
674
20
0
00
20
754
0
04
40
755
0
07
30
757
0
08
761
20
0
00
80
774
0
08
50
789
0
00
20
791
0
20
08
788
0
00
30
786
0
01
00
797
0
00
20
795
0
06
00
798
0
07
10
799
10
0
01
796
0
00
20
800
0
12
10
2134
00
20
0
2142
0
04
30
2149
70
0
08
2150
1358Gl /2005-21 4914
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] तहसील: मांडल
राज्य : राजस्थान
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा संख्या
गांव का नाम
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
2
3
4
1
5
02
10
2151
0
06
40
2153
0
13
50
2152
0
05
40
2179
0
08
70
2191
0
00
20
2159
0
09
80
2192
30
0
2262
08
0
00
80
2264
0
10
50
2263
0
09
40
2259
0
15
2254
90
ॐ
0
00
2252
12
08
2251
0
30
0
07
20
2245
0
2226
01
80
0
2227
13
10
0
20
2244
00
07
2230
0
10
0.5
0
2334
60
0
02
60
2335
2337
0
12
60
0
05
10
1281
अमरगढ़
0
12
1284
00
0
02
1283
50
0
01
50
1293
0
25
80
1288
0
02
60
1289
0
1356
10
30
0
17
70
1355मिन
0
1354
14
30
0
1353
01
20 4915 भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
तहसील : मांडल
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य: राजस्थान
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
खसरा सख्या
एयर वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
4
2
5.
3
1
02
0
1352
50
0
10
09
1350
0
04
80
1385
0
06
50
1387
0
00
20
1386
0
13
40
1388
0
06
70
1392
0
05
30
1391
0
20
01
1393
0
30
12
1394
0
60
23
1395
0
19
30
1608
10
0
01
1604
20
0
06
1609
0
07
10
1610
0
06
30
1611
0-7
10
0
1612
0
30
15
1618/1
07
0
60
1617
70
0
08
1616
0
17
50
1615
0
40
1720
14
0
00
20
1717
0
19
20
1715
0
10
08
1716
0
20
07
1666
02
0
00
1665
0
05
30
1664
0
05
40
1649
0
08
80
1663
0
09
10
1661
0
00
05
1658 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4916
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
जिलाः भीलवाड़ा
राज्य: राजस्थान तहसील : मांडल
क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सख्ख्या
गांव का नाम
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर एयर
5
4
3
2
1
00
0
02
1657
70
05
0
1659
[फा. सं. आर-25011/31/2004-ओ.आर-। ]
एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 10th May, 2005
S. O. 1795.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 156 dated 11.01.2005 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land in Tehsil : Mandal , District Bhilwara in the State of Rajasthan , specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Rajasthan from Beawar to Chittaurgarh in respect of " Branch Pipeline to Chittaurgarh from Sidhpur – Sanganer Pipeline" by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited
And whereas , copy of the said notification was made available to the general public on 02.02.2005
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Qil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
4917
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/ वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
SCHEDULE
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Khasara No. Name of the Village
2
1
1188 HISANIYA
1187
1200
1214
1216
1213
1222
1225
1224
1235
1247
1236
1242
1241
1239
1317
1315
1316
1325
1326
1327
1309 Area Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
4
5
3
90
0
03
50
36
0
10
0
05
80
05
0
30
0
02
09
0
60
30
00
0
40
0
03
90
0
08
20
0
09
00
20
0
50
0
09
0
04
50
12
0
50
0
01
80
0
06
70.
60
0
00
07
50
0
0
11
80
0
00
80
0
20
01
0
70.
08
10
04
0
2026/1310
16
20
0.
1981/1300
1300
1302
1786
1823
1824
1822
40
0
11
70
0
20
20
0
22
0
10 60
0
00
60
20
0
10 4918
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
2
3
4
5 1
0
08
90
1839
0
00
20
1.836
10
0
10
1850
0
20
1838
00
05
40
0
1851
0
00
1852
04
0
40
11
1847
0
30
09
1899
0
00
20
1903
0
02
90
1900
0
80
09
1902
0
60
05
1930
0
10
16
1923
0
10
70
1919
00
0
20
1925
0
07
40
1918
00
0
20
1914Min
30
00
1965
0
0
00
20
1967
30
17
0
2057/1989
0
70
01
1968
70
0
03
SODANPURA
104
70
0
08
103
0
01
10
110
30
0
00
102
30
0
09
111
0
02
90
116
10
0
06
115
50
0
00
504/124Min
50
0
01
122
10
0
08
121
0
30
05
506/124Min
4919
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/ वैशाख 24, 1927.
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Tehsil : MANDAL
District: BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Khasara No.
"Name of the Village
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
4
2
5 1
3
0
05
507/126
40
0
16
50
128
0
12
140/1
90
142
0
00
20
0
09
40
140Min
139
0
04
70
0
05
50
141
152
20
0
00
246
0
02
10
0
295
01
00
296
00
30
0
10
294
0
20
459/283
0
00
20
283Min
0
08
10
03
0
50
453/283
282
01
10
0
275
0
05
00
0
00
90
274
0
04
60
276
0
00
60
277
0
273
60
04
255Min
0
04
20
270
0
10
10
0
258/1
00
20
0
30
258Min
04
0
326Min
00
20
0
90
268
09
02
0
267
80
0
00
20
266
0
327
03
90
0
00
60
234
00
20
329
0 4920
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
3
2
4
5 1
70
02
328
0
01
330
0
50
06
0
10
233
0
232
02
00
392/231/1
0
10
60
392/231/2
392/231Min
393/231/1
0
07
50
393/231Min
00
230
0
20
0
16
00
231/1
0
12
218
50
0
217
08
70
216
0
09
00
215
0
15
70
0
04
214
50
0
12
60
192
10
0
40
191
0
02
190
90
0
20
60
438/188
0
BHAGWANPURA
40
1344
19
0
01
4767/1345
00
0
1345
00
20
0
1354
00
15 ,
0
14
1353
70
03
1359
0
60
0
1360
00
14
0
15
70
1349
0
00
1361
30
0
60
1362
24
0
12
1364
00
1366
0
10
70 4921 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
Tehsil : MANDAL
District : BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
2
1
3
4
5
1367Min
10
0
50
1367/1
0
05
40
26
0
1466
20
1439
0
01
20
0
03
4878/1429
80
1525
0
06
30
0
1524
16
20
0
1612
19
50
0
06
1611
10
0
02
1610
30
13
1626
0
30
0
00
20
1627
0
00
4780/1599
20
0
23
4928/1598
80
02
20
0
1598
0
11
1597
20
06
0
20
1593
0
06
40
1594
27
1568
0
00
0
20
1998
00
0
10
80
1999
0
01
50
4770/2000
0
22
2000
00
2001
0
70
08
0
00
20
2002
0
13
00
2003
0
20
04
4759/2080
60
15
0
2080
00
0
20
2087
0
40
00
4880/2103
0
00
90
5170/2103
05
0
90
2088
1358 GI/ 2005-22 [PART II-SEC , 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
4922
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
3
4
5
2
1
0
05
90
5188/2089
02
70
0
2089
0
16
50
2090
0
01
20
2067
01
0
80
2093
0
00
20
2094
0
02
50
2092
0
30
03
2191
0
00
2192
09
0
00
2204
80
0
00
70
2193
0
10
08
2194
0
02
40
2205
0
02
80
2200
0
06
80
2195
0
04
80
2199
0
06
20
2198
00
20
2214
0
0
01
40
2371
0
60
04
2368
40
00
0
2367
06
60
0
2369
0
13
80
2370
0
12
10
2360
0
01
20
2358
0
70
08
2357
0
00
20
2356
0
02
10
2355
00
0
10
2354
0
01
90
2351
10
2350
0
16
11
2417
0
80 4923 भारत का राजमत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Tehsil : MANDAL
District: BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
4
3
1
2
5 SURAJPURA
0
01
2
90
0
1
00
80
4
0
10
04
02
5
0
20
0
50
775/6
14
8
0
01
00
0.
32
7
00
17
0
08
70
0
154
05
20
0
00
40
153
184
0
40
07
0
185
15
50
10
0
188
30
187
01
0
70
02
0
181
30
03
0
50
180 :
196
0
01
10
11
205
0
70
0
206
05
30
0
11
207
40
0
210
00
06
0
308
13
20
0
307
04
90
0
03
306
60
0
00
304
20
305
0
03
30
0
302
03
30
0
301
07
40
00
80
295
0
0
00
354
70
0
03
40
294
0
292
05
90 4924
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : MANDAL
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr.
3
4
5 1
2
0
03
20
293
733/284
0
02
10
0
02
40
284
00
286
0
20
02
282
0
30
0
285
70
02
02
0
281
40
0
01
20
280
0
278
00
20
0
03
30
279
380
04
20
0
16
0
00
20
0
300
00
20 BHIMADIYAS
0
00
718
20
0
01
20
719
0
06
720
10
0
21
722
10
00
723
0
80
0
04
90
724
0
02
20
725
0
11
729
00
10
733
40
0
741
0
01
00
0
01
30
739
740
0
11
30
0
00
744
20
0
06
745
30
757
0
05
60
00
0
758.
20
0
10
756
70
02
760
0
30
761
0
06
00 4925 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
District : BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : MANDAL
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr.
4
2
3
5 1
0
40
883
09
0
886
02
00
0
885
05
30
0
06
70
884
0
877
10
80
0
875
07
70
869
0
00
20
0
00
870
08
871
0
03
40
0
00
30
873
0
847
07
90
846
03
0
80
0
02
845
60
0
00
1480/846
40
0
07
834
70
0
02
844
10
0
835
07
00
0
836
00
20
0
832
01
70
0
05
831
80
0
830
10
80
0
1522/1022
08
40
1014
0
00
20
1021
0
04
00
0
1018
10
80
0
1020
10
18
0
07
1138
40
0
1162
02
70 RAJPURA
0
11
00
20
12
0
10
80
21
0
04
40
0
17
17
70 4926
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
Tehsil : MANDAL
[PART II- SEC . 3 (i) ]
District : BHILWARA
Khasara No :
Name of the Village
1
2
19
18
20 THOB KA KHERA
19
16 State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
3
4
5
0
01
30
0
02
70
0
03
90
0
12
40
0
00
70
0
183/20
15/1
15/2
27
28
30
31
32
33
104
115
114
39
50
0
00
60
25
60
0
07
0
40
0
30
14
0
40
00
0
01
10
0
11
20
0
09
80
0
12
60
0
30
29
0
07
40
0
70
174/114
09
04
0
50
189/110
0
11
40
190/148
320 THABOLA
343
342
341
321
313
312
311
310
309
324
325 0
16
20
0
00
40
0
03
70
0
06
30
0
00
08
0
03
40
0
17
20
0
14
40
0
20
12
0
28
80
0
04
20
0
00
80 4927 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr.
2
3
4
5 1
0
865
06
60
0
1237/868
08
90
0
875
50
18
876
0
13
70
0
1220/876
10
80
0
904
08
50
0
903
08
10
902
0
60
08
0
1193/902
06
60
0
899
00
40
0
906
20
40
0
895
11
60
0
894
00
20
0
937
20
05
0
908
30
04
0
909
12
60
0
910
05
20
0
911
13
00
0
913
11.
60
0
925
23
90
920
0
39
00
0
1127
01
80
0
17
297
60 BHALARI KHERA
0
300
09
00
0
00
298
08
301
0
11
00
304Min
0
07
10
0
07
10
338/1
0
02
00
338Min
0 . 02
70
337
403
0
05
90
0
02
00
404 4928
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
Tehsil : MANDAL
District : BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
4
1
2
3
5
0
01
402
20
0
400
08
90
00
407
0
20
00
0
30
399
60
0
08
408
00
406
0
90
05
0
10
419
410
0
06
00
0
16
418
10
03
50
417
0
30
653
0
10
0
625
13
00
624
20
0
00
627
0
15
60
20
0
00
633
632
0
01
40
30
40
0
631
0
01
10
630
30
638
0
02
BHADU
0
16
70
2855/1320
30
2850/1320
0
26
0
17
10
2901/1320
2985/1320
0
16
70
03
50
2984/1320
0
0
2982/1320
20
40
20
0
15
1298
1308
00
0
60
0
04
20
1299
0
07
60
1300
0
02
00
1301
80
18
0
19
00
19
0
02 4929 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Khasara No.
Nameof the Village
Area Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr.
3
4
5
2
00
0
158
80
10
0
10
159
00
0
20
155
07
0
10
161
00
20
162/1
0
0
.09
70
163
01
0
50
165
0
09
00
170
0
03
80
169
03
0
90
168
0
02 -20
167
0
0
50
199
0
23 30
480
07
0
40
477
0
70
11
476
00
0
20
475
02
0
80
518
0
30
523
00:
0
10
80
524
0
01
30
526
0
06
70
527
02
0
90
529
20
573
0
07
13
0
40
572
0
90
08
571
0
04
50
576
0
20
08
567
0
11
60
566
20
00
0
613
00
0
03
614
00
20
0
612
10
07
0
615
1358GI/2005-23 [PART 11- SEC . 3 ( i ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24. 1927
4930
State : RAJASTHAN
District: BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Khasara No.
Nameof the Village
Hectare
Area Are Sq.mtr.
4
5
2
3
1
0
50
09
616
0
08
90
627
03
617
0
80
09
0
00
625
00
0
622
20
0
00
20
623
00
630
0
20
0
04
624
80
0
07
631
70
0
00
40
731
0
00
729
20
0
14
20
735
0
16
30
777
0
70
02
778
0
00
780
18
20
0
00
783
0
50
04
784
01
0
90
786
0
20
09
785
20
0
00
790
0
13
90
791
10
03
792
0
09
0
70
793
0
16
40
797
20
0
11
796
0
03
10
795
0
60
06
2934/704
0
04
20
2862/2290
0
06
50
2821/2290
0
10
80
2914/2290
23
0
00
2916/2290
40
0.
43
2926/2290
4931 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खपक 3(ii)]
District : BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : MANDAL
Area
KhasaraNo.
Name of the Village
Are
Here
Sq.mtr.
4
3
2
5 1
2840/2290
19
80
0
0
38
90
2837/2290
30
10
2853/2290
0
0
24
30
2924/2290
07
2292Min
50
0
12
0
90
2834/2292
0
11
20
2684/2292
70 GHORAS
0
02
1806
0
18
1807
40
0
07
1809
30
60
0
04
1810
0
11
10
1803
0
00
40
2073/1
0
2128
00
40
0
90
05
2133
60
0
08
2134
70
0
00
2136
12.
40
2135
0
2149
0
11
20
0
20
2148
00
10
0
40
2155
0
00
2161/1
20
0
11
70
2162
00
0
50
2178
0
04
70
2177
0
07
80
2176
00
20
2175
0
0
10
2173
70
05
60
0
2216
0
01
00
2218
0
06
10
2217
0
00
60
2274/1
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4932
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
District : BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN Tehsil : MANDAL
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
4
2
5 1
3
2274/2
0
80
04
2288
0
00
90
0
2289
02
60
06
2291
0
20
07
2302
0
20
0
01
00
2303
0
06
10
2318
03
2317
0
80
0
2319
09
10
02
2320
0
50
0
40
2321
04
0
01.
2334/1
80
2333
0
04
00
2332
0
05
80
0
2348/1
04
70
0
00
20
2348/2
05
40
2349
0
09
50
2350
0
0
01
2358
00
00
30
2352
0
0
2351
20
08
PITHAS
01
153
0
40
0
00
20
152
28
154
0
80
0
07
155
80
108
0
09
90
0
60
107
09
0
00
113
50
0
02
112
-80
56
0
01
60
0
10
20
57
62
0
14
40 4933
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग 1]-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
Tehsil : MANDAL
District: BHILWARA
Khasara No ..
Nameof the Village
1
2
61
590
593
594
596
693
604
689
688
687
682
683
674
754
755
757
761
774
789
791
788
786
797
795
798
799
796
800
2134
2142
2149
2150 State : RAJASTHAN
Area Are
Hectare
Sq.mtr .
3
4
5
0
11
20
0
13
50
0
12
50
0
70
04
0
18
60
0
01
30
0
06
30
07
0
00
0
09
30
0.
00
20
0
00
80
0
06
70
0
10
20
00
0
20
0
04.
40
0
07
30
20
0
08
0
00
80
0
08
50
00
0
20
0
20
08
0
00
30
0
00
01
0
00
20
0
06
00
0
07
10
0
01
10
0
00
20
0
12
10
0
00
20
0
30
04
70
0
08 4934
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
Tehsil : MANDAL
District : BHILWARA
State : RAJASTHAN
Area
Khasara No.
Name of the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1
2
3
4
5
2151
0
02
10
0
2153
06
40
2152
0
13
50
2179
0
05
40
0
2191
08
70
2159
0
00
20
2192
0
09
80
2262
0
30
08
2264
0
00
80
2263
0
10
50
2259
0
40
09
2254
0
15
90
0
2252
12
00
2251
0
08
30
0
2245
07
20
2226
0
01
80
2227
0
13
10
2244
00
20
0
2230
0
07
10
2334
0
05
60
2335
0
02
60
2337
0
12
60 AMARGARH
0
1281
05
10
0
1284
12
00
0
1283
02
50
1293
0
01
50
0
1288
25
80
0
1289
02
60
0
1356
10
30
0
1355Min.
17
70
0
1354
14
30
1353
0
01
20
0
02
50
1352
0
09
13
1350
0
04
80
1385
0
06
1387
50 4935
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग ] ] - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
State : RAJASTHAN
District : BHILWARA
Tehsil : MANDAL
Area
Khasara No.
Nameof the Village
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
4
5
3
2
1
00
0
20
1386
0
13
40
1388
06
0
70
1392
30
05
0
1391
0
01
20
1393
30
0
12
1394
0
23
60
1395
30
0
19
1608
0
01.
10
1604
0
06
20
1609
0
07
10
1610
0
06
30
1611
07
10
0
1612
30
0
15
1618/1
07
0
60
1617
08
0
70
1616
17
0
50
1615
14
0
40
1720
00
20
0
1717.
0
19 20
1715
-08
10
0
1716
0
20
07.
1666
0
02
00
1665
05
0
30
1664
40
0
05
1649
0
80
08
1663
10
0
09
1661
0
05
00
1658
02
00
0
1657
70
05
0
1659
[No. R- 25011/31/2004- O.R. -I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
4936
[PART II- SEC 3 ( ii ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
नई दिल्ली, 11 मई , 2005
का. आ. 1796.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 153 तारीख 10 जनवरी , 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 15 जनवरी, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य मेंमें पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई- मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 11 फरवरी , 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है.
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य: मध्यप्रदेश
तहसील: आगर जिला: शाजापुर
क्र० ग्राम का नाम
क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में
सर्वे नंबर
4
1
2
3
1 रनायरा राठौर
0.8217
620 (शा० भूमि)
627
0.1214
0.0111
626
0.0102
629
628
0.0646
642
0.3519
643
0.3216
644
0.2999
0.1801
780
779
0.0167
0.0645
783
784
0.0518
793
0.1361
806
0.1866
0.0326
799
798
0.0434
797
0.0150
800
0.1194
801
0.0903
0.1315
825
828
0.0959
829
0.353%
0.0292
821 (शा० भूमि)
0.0210
796
0.1687
2 भीमपुरा
110 (शा० भूमि)
112
0.1284
0.0254
108
107
0.2663
0.0888
122
0.0423
126
0010
105 4937 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
3
4
104
0.0791
2 भीमपुरा (जारी....)
0.0778
103
102
0.0763
0.0917
100
0491
99
0.1505
188
0.0102
98
0.4448
189 (शा० भूमि)
0.1281
208
0.0131
206 (शा० भूमि)
204
0.1432
205
0.0589
0.0387
203
0.0417
202 (शा० नाला)
0.0754
201
460
0.0768
0.0380
459
493
0.0545
0.3221
492
0.0921
49.1 (शा० भूमि)
0.1870
498
0.0100
499
502
0.0204
0.1531
503
0.0268
508 (शा० नाला)
0.0773
510 (शा० भूमि)
0.0060
111 (शा० भूमि)
0.0220
114
3 लक्ष्मणखेड़ी
:
0.1181
115
0.1188
116/482
0.0924
117
0.0806
118.
0.0377
119
0.1783
130
0.0234
129
0.0337
132
0.0277
137
0.0637
136
0.0404
140
0.1084
156 (शा० नाला)
0.0491
142
0.0284
202 (शा० भूमि)
0.0301
143
0.0159
164 (शा० भूमि)
0.0151
182 ( शा० भूमि)
0.0379
165 (शा० भूमि)
0.0547
181
0.0616
166
0.0290
167
0.0200
160.
0.0231
169
0.0396
170
0.0310
330
1358GI /2005-24 4938
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
2
3
356 3 लक्ष्मणखेड़ी (जारी.....)
354
355 (शा० नाला)
357
358
359
360
361
362(शा० भूमि)
351
349
350
347
459
457
458
448
467
473
329
166/483
144
163
469 (शा० नाला)
472
161
168
171
352
466
12 4 जैतपुरा
23
22 (शा० भूमि)
32(शा० नाला)
33 (शा० भूमि)
34 (शा० भूमि)
45 (शा० भूमि)
डब्ल्यू.बी.एम (शा० सड़क)
43
39
41
44
11
3 5 गांगडा बुजुर्ग
4
9
8
7
17
18
1 (शा० भूमि)
1 6 गांगडा हद्दा
Puer 11-- Ser. 3( ii ) | 4
0.0531
0.0305
0.0912
0.0564
0.0471
0.0441
0.0364
0.0449
0.0118
0.0630
0.0908
0.0507
0.1401
0.2000
0.0309
0.1421
0.2889
0.0613
0.2255
0.0800
0.0600
0.0110
0.0115
0.0162
0.0900
0.0100
0.0200
0.0200
0.0100
0.0100
0.1197
0.0787
0.2159
0.0300
0.0128
0.2788
0.2902
0.0271
0.1901
0.0594
0.0921
0.0100
0.0100
0.0420
0.0825
0.0179
0.0381
0.2498
0.0014
0.0795
0.0150
0.1133 4939
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग ।। - वच्छ 3 ( il) ]
3 भादवा
1261 (शा० नाला)
1249
1256
1254
1335 (शा० रास्ता)
1336
1334
1342
1343
1341
1346
1323
1322
1320 (शा० भूमि)
1319
1318
1317
1444
1443
1442
1440
1382(शा० रास्ता) 8 भ्याना
230 (शा० नाला)
272
274
279
314
286
267 (शा० भूमि)
310
308
320
306
323
396
392
394
390(शा० नाला)
379
380
381
382
385
386
581 (शा० नाला)
585
586
587
602 ( शा० रास्ता)
361
360
358 (शा० भूमि)
359 (शा० भूमि)
603 (शा० रास्ता) 4
0.0451
0.1740
0.0105
0.2081
0.0221
0.1063
0.0148
0.1622
0.0132
0.0141
0.0740
0.1130
0.1095
0.0956
0.1531
0.0134
0.0146
0.1976
0.1075
0.1664
0.0891
0.0100
0.0486
0.2618
0.3976
0.1944
0.1559
0.1018
0.1979
0.0177
0.1834
0.0410
0.0598
0.1349
0.0215
0.1090
0.1338
0.0187
0.0149
0.0276
0.0276
0.0677
0.1207
0.0400
0.0186
0.0857
0.0901
0.1628
0.0987
0.1841
0.0255
0.0255
0.2763
0.0277 4940
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
1
2
3 8
भ्याना (जारी.....)
719 (शा० भूमि)
716
745
744
781
780
779
785
778
777
776
77.5
786
787
788
790
789
791 (शा० नाला)
803 (शा० भूमि)
802
805 (शा० भूमि)
808
816
814
822
823 (शा० नाला)
806 (शा० भूमि)
717 (शा० भूमि)
718 (शा० भूमि)
833
834
801
288 9 जामुनिया
318
315
319
320
326
327 (शा० भूमि)
332
334
341 ( शा० नाला)
374
381
382
384
383
351 (शा० रास्ता) 10 सेंमली
505 ( शा० भूमि)
506 (शा० भूमि)
509 ( शा० भूमि)
77 11 परसुखेड़ी
[PART II-SEC. 3 ) 4
0.6581.
0.0677
0.1635
0.1883
0.0793
0.1131
0.0649
0.2407
0.0316
0.0179
0.0241
0.0290
0.0159
0.0187
0.1585
0.0131
0.0224
0.0413
0.0102
0.2360
0.2037
0.2032
0.1642
0.0884
0.2043
0.0611
0.0120
0.0100
0.0100
0.2100
0.0100
0.0100
0.2077
0.2977
0.2779
0.0451
0.1231
0.3061
0.1636
0.5112
0.0394
0.0347
0.1762
0.1141
0.0457
0.0812
0.0503
0.0300
0.0930
0.1557
0.1556
0.2760 [ भाग ॥- खण्ड 3( ⅱ) ]
4941
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
3 11 परसुखेड़ी (जारी....)
76 (शा० भूमि)
93
103 (शा० भूमि)
95
62
104
109
110 (शा० भूमि)
137 ( शा० भूमि)
149
146
145
139
144
140 (शा० भूमि)
141
193 (शा० रास्ता)
143
244 (शा० भूमि)
245
246
242
299
298
296
295
309 (शा० नाला)
310
348
349 (शां० रास्ता) 378 (शा० भूमि)
369 (शा० भूमि)
374
376
377 (शा० भूमि)
379
380
381 ( शा० भूमि)
664 (शा० भूमि)
499
501 (शा० भूमि)
500
506 (शा० भूमि)
505 (शा० भूमि)
512
508 (शा० भूमि)
510
509 (शा० भूमि)
527
526 (शा० भूमि)
525 (शा० भूमि)
523 4
0.2820
0.0550
0.5174
0.0186
0.0152
0.2595
0.0138
0.1123
0.0292
0.0530
0.0493
0.0629
0.0437 .
0.0111
0.0266
0:0664
0.0256
0.0173
0.0344
0.0701
0.1678
0.0105
0.1013
0.1876
0.0367
0.0127
0.0561
0.0848
0.0299
0.0533
0.0360
0.0110
0.0155
0.0119
0.0312
0.1512
0.7200
0.0311
0.2546
0.0465
0.0844
0.0119
0.0564
0.0948
0.1610
0.0810
0.0105
0.0280
0.1161
0.0278
0.1211
0.0785 4942
[PART II-SEC. 3 (i) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
1
2
4
11
524
0.0109
परसुखेड़ी (जारी....
520
0.0933
522
0.1901
535
0.0110
0.0246
521 (शा० नाला)
548
0.0347
549
0.1303
552
0.4038
586
0.1066
0.0281
584 (शा० भूमि)
0.0153
583
0.0333
585 (शा० भूमि)
0.0166
582(शा० नाला)
561
0.0460
559
0.3212
147
0.0100
142
0.0100
0.0400
220 (शा० नाला)
311
0.0200
29
0.0668
12 बांसखेड़ी
28
0.0232
23
0.0594
22
0.2584
21
0.0570
18
0.2290
14
0.3167
16
0.0305
15
0.0257
10
0.0214
62
0.0266
0.0821
9
0.3863
64
0.0485
69
0.2335
65
66
0.1331
132
0.0604
131
0.4853
123
0.1628
124
0.5648
122
0.0104
120
0.7518
85
0.0189
87
0.2182
90
0.4257
17
0.0145
68
0.0100
180
0.0376
13 निघानिया बैजनाथ
179
0.0545
178
0.0203
177
0.0317
0.0124
176 (शा० भूमि)
175
0.0379
174.
0.0358
173
0.0541 4943
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2
3
172 13 निपानिया बैजनाथ (जारी....)
171
169
167
164
163
162
106 (शा० भूमि)
108
111
113
69 (शा ० रास्ता)
119
118
117
114 (शा० भूमि)
84
78
79
80
81 (शा० रास्ता)
392
400
391
390
389
388
385
386(शा० भूमि)
387 (शा० भूमि)
472(शा० नाला)
471
467
465
469
464
470 (शा० रास्ता)
491
545
537
536
535
534
532
531
528
527
523
522
521
563 (शा० भूमि)
576
578 (शा० भूमि) 4
0.0813
0.0378
0.0769
0.1018
0.2028
0.0892
0.1437
0.0879
0.0808
0.1851
0.0763
0.0100
0.0350
0.0157
0.0304
0.0843
0.0501
0.0113
0.0513
0.0568
0.0151
0.0394
0.0111
0.0310
0.0142
0.0311
0.0335
0.0138
0.0151
0.0307
0.0128
0.0216
0.1102
0.0930
0.0598
0.0836
0.0184
0.2732
0.5037
0.2585
0.0119
0.0282
0.0497
0.0893
0.0855
0.1000
0.1000
0.1084
0.0745
0.1264
0.1555
0.2559
0.2513 4944
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
1
2
3 13 निपानिया बैजनाथ (जारी....)
[PART II-SEC.
4
0.0429
584 (शा० भूमि)
583 0.0305
0.0955
579 (शा० भूमि)
580
1249
1250
1251
1252 0.1923
0.0715
0.1474
0.1381
0.1779
0.0559
1246 (शा० भूमि)
581
393
395
107
159
587 0.0100
0.0100
0.0100
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.0300
107 (शा० भूमि)
159 14 काशी बर्डिया
0.0200
0.0202
613 ( शा० भूमि)
633
614
629
630
627
628
625
626
621 0.0199
0.1079
0.1115
0.0721
0.0264
0.0541
0.0424
0.0176
0.0936
620/905
0.0340
0.0489
647 (शा० नाला)
663
662
664
665
835
702
703
704
706
707
808
809
807
814
815
816
802
778
779 0.0609
0.0184
0.0504
0.0431
0.0654
0.0117
0.1052
0.1958
0.1572
0.0877
0.0988
0.3209
0.2099
0.1571
0.1261
0.1793
0.0102
0.3037
0.1854
0.0170
735 (शा० रास्ता)
772
622 0.0681
0.1000
0.0100
667 (शा० नाला)
803 15 भीमलोद
0.0100
0.5326
299 (शा० भूमि)
0.0340
81 (शा० नाला)
4945 [ भन II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
4
1
2
3
0.5001
15 भीमलोद (जारी....
298 (शा० भूमि)
103
0.0536
1.3155
297 (शा० भूमि)
0.0248
296 (शा० रास्ता)
293
0.1911
0.0348
294
295
0.0412
0.0497
133 (शा० नाला)
282
6.0423
381
0.0170
389
0.0525
0.0173
390
0.0742
388
0.0281
397 (शा० रास्ता)
459
0.0792
475
0.1103
474
0.0362
473
C0138
476
0.0712
0.0527
506
505
0.0538
0.0202
504
507
0.0348
508
0.0161
522
0.0553
521
0.1576
536
0.0688
537
0.0321
0.0210
515
543
0.0387
0.0565
544 (शा० रास्ता)
0.0119
546
547
0.2339
0.0125
548
0.0689
545 (शा० रास्ता)
0.0100
283
1126
0.0465
16 बापच्या
0.0496
1125
0.0366
1124
0.0311
1138 (शा० नाला)
0.0783
1099
1100
0.1366
1098
0.0149
0.0292
1097
0.1173
1055
0.0752
1095
0.0457
1094
0.0266
1055
0.1480
1057
0.0450
1059
0.1172
1060
0.0322
1061
0.0820.
1043
1358 GI/2005-25 4946
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
[PART3 (0 ) 2
3
4
0.1118
1024
16 बापच्या (जारी.....)
0.1163
1023
1021
0:0690
1020
0.0602
0.1342
1001 (शा० रास्ता)
1002
0.0418
1003
0:1455
908
0.0266
899
0.1093
0.0159
898 (शा० रास्ता)
897
0.1975
892
0.0817
0.1571
891
893
0.0227
888
0.1226
0.0126
889
882
0.0151
884
0.0230
883
0.0122
0.0764
885
886
0.0251
0.0449
861
0.0299
862
859
0.0030
860
0.0950
0.0261
858 (शा० भूमि)
0.0604
819 (शा० भूमि)
0.0534
825 (शा० भूमि)
0.3212
823(शा० भूনি) -
0.0275
824 (शा० सड़क)
1122
0.0100
0.0155
808
0.0360
887( शा० नाला)
0.0125
813
814
0.0290
17 कराडिया
0.4673
659 (शा० भूमि)
616
0.1648
617
0.0703
618
0.1051
619
0.1141
0.0265
606 (शा० नाला)
595
0.1124
596
0.2541
592
0.0152
591
0.2375
589
0.0327
586
0.0294
0.0155
537 ( शा० नाला)
524
0.0155
523
0.2406
529
0.2337
482
0.2446
0.0281
480 (शा० नाला)
0.2421
479(शा० भूमि)
[ फा.सं.आर - 31015 / 68 /2004- ओ आर - II ]
हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव 4947
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
New Delhi , the 11th May , 2005
8. 0. 1796.-Whereas by a notification ofthe Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.0.153 , dated the 10th January, 2005, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) ofsection 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Lana) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India das the 15th January, 2005, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notiflestion for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai-Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 11th February,2005;
Andwhereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted reporttothe Central Government ;
Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land , specified in the Schedule, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferres by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
DISTRICT : SHAJAPUR STATE: MADHYA PRADESH TEHSIL: AGAR
AREA IN HECTARE
SURVEY NO.
3.No. NAME OF VILLAGE
2
3
4
0.8217
RANAIRA RATHOR
820(Govt. Land)
0.1214
627
0.0111
626
0.0102
629
0.0646
628
0.3519
642
0.3216
643
0.2999
644
0.1801-
780
0.0167
779
783
0.0645
0.0518
784
0.1361
793
0.1886
806
0.0326
798
0.0434
798
0.0150
797
0.1194
800
0.0903
801
0.1315
825
0.0959
828
0.3537
829
0.0292
821(Govt. Land) `
0.0210
796
0.1687
110(Govt . Land)
2 BHIMPURA
0.1284
112
0.0254
108
0.2663
107
0.0888
122
0.0433
126
0.0105
105
0.0791
104 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
4948
3
2
103 1 2 2 BHIMPURA ( Contd .....)
102
100
99
188
98
189 ( Govt. Land)
208
206(Govt. Land)
204
205
203
202(Govt . Nala)
201
460
459
493
492
491(Govt. Land)
498
499
502
503
508 ( Govt . Nala)
510 (Govt. Land)
111 (Govt. Land)
114 LAXMANKHERI
3
115
116/482
1,17
118
119
130
129
132
137
136
140
156 (Govt . Nala)
142
202(Govt. Land)
143
164(Govt. Land)
182(Govt. Land)
165 (Govt . Land)
181
166
167
-160
169
170
330
331(River)
356
354
355(Govt . Nala)
357
358
359
360
361
362(Govt. Land)
351 [ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( 0) 4
0.0778
0.0763
0.0917
0.0491
0.1505
0.0102
0.4448
0.1281
0.0131
0.1432
0.0589
0.0387
0.0417
0.0754
0.0768
0.0380
0.0545
0.3221
0.0921
0.1870
0.0100
0.0204
0.1531
0.0268
0.0773
3.0060
0.0220
0.1181
0.1188
0.0924
0.0806
0.0377
0.1783
0.0234
0.0337
0.0277
0.0637
0.0404
0.1084
0.0491
0.0284
0.0301
0.0159
0.0151
0.0379
0.0547
0.0616
0.0290
0.0200
0.0231
0.0396
0.0310
0.0355
0.0531
0.0305
0.0912
0.0564
0.0471
0.0441
0.0364
0.0449
0.0118
0.0630 [!!]
4949
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
3
2
349
350 LAXMANKHERI (Contd.....)
347
459
457
458
448
467
473
329
166/483
144
163
469(Govt. Nala)
472
161
168
171
352
466
12 JAITPURA
23
22(Govt . Land)
32(Govt . Nala)
33(Govt . Land)
34(Govt. Land)
45(Govt. Land)
WBM ROAD
43
39
41
44
11
3 5 GANGADA BUJURG
4
9
8
7
17
6
18
1(Govt. Land)
1 6 GANGADA HADDA
7 BHADWA
1261 (Govt . Nala)
1249
1256
1254
1335 (Govt . Rasta)
1336
1334
1342
1343
1341
1346
1323
1322
1320(Govt. Land)
1319
1318
1317
1444
1443
1442 4
0.0908
0.0507
0.1401
0.2000
0.0309
0.1421
0.2889
0.0613
0.2255
0.0800
0.0600
0.0110
0.01.15
0.0162
0.0900
0.0100
0.0200
0.0200
0.0100
0.0100
0.1197
0.0787
0.2159
0.0300
0.0128
0.2788
0.2902
0.0271
0.1901
0.0594
0.0921
0.0100
0.0100
0.0420
0.0825
0.0179
0.0381
0.2498
0.0014
0.0690-
-0.0795
0.0150
0,1133,
0.0451
0.1740
0.0105-
0.2081
0.0221
0.1063
0.0148
0.1622
0.0132
0.0141
0.0740
0.1130
0.1095
0.0956
0.1531
0.0134
0.0146
0.1976
0.1075
0.1664 4950
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA24, 1927
2
३ 7
1440 BHADWA ( Contd .....)
1382(Govt. Rasta) 8 BHYANA
230(Govt. Nala)
272
274
279
314
286
287(Govt . Land)
310
308
320
306
323
396
392
394
390(Govt . Nala)
379
380
381
382
385
386
581(Govt . Nala)
585
586
587
602(Govt . Rasta)
361
360
358(Govt. Land)
359(Govt. Land)
603 (Govt . Rasta)
719(Govt. Land)
716
745
744
781
780
779
785
778
777
776
775
786
787
788
790
789
791 (Govt . Nala)
803 (Govt. Land)
802
805(Govt. Land)
808
816
814
822
823(Govt. Nala)
806(Govt . Land)
717 (Govt . Land)
718(Govt . Land) [PART I- SEC . 3 (9)] 4
0.0891
0.0100
0.0486
0.2618
0.3976
0.1944
0.1558
0.1018
0.1978
0.0177
0.1834
0.0410
0.0598
0.1349
0.0215
0.1090
0.1338
0.0187
0.0149
0.0276
0.0276
0.0677
0.1207
0.0400
0.0186
0.0857
0.0901
0.1628
0.0987
0.1841
0.0255
0.0255
0.2763
0.0277
0.6581
0.0677
0.1635
0.1883
0.0793
0.1131
0.0649
0.2407
0.0316
0.0179
0.0241
0.0290
0.0159
0.0187
0.1585
0.0131
0.0224
0.0413
0.0102
0.2360
0.2037
0.2032
0.1642
0.0884
0.2043
0.0611
0.0120
0.0100
0.0100 4951
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
3 (H) ]
2
2
833 BHYANA(Contd.....)
834
801
288 JAMUNIYA
318
315
319
320
326
327(Govt. Land)
332
334
341(Govt . Nala)
374
381-
382
384
383
351 (Govt. Rasta) 10. BEMALI
505(Govt. Land)
506(Govt. Land)
509(Govt. Land)
77 11 PARSUKHERI
76(Govt. Land)
93
103 (Govt. Land)
95
62
104
109
110 (Govt . Land)
137 (Govt . Land)
149
146
145
139
144
140 (Govt. Land)
141
193 (Govt. Rasta)
143
244 (Govt . Land)
245
246
242
299
298
296
295
309 (Govt . Nala)
310
348
349 (Govt . Rasta)
378(Govt. Land)
369(Govt. Land )
374
376
377 (Govt . Land)
379
380
381(Govt. Land)
664(Govt. Land)
499 4
0.2100
0.0100
0.0100
0.2077
0.2977
0.2779
0.0451
0.1231
0.3061
0.1636
0.5112
0.0394
0.0347
0.1762
0.1141
0.0457
0.0812
0.0503
0.0300
0:0930
0.1557
0.1556
0.2760
0.2820
0.0550
0.5174
0.0186
0.0152
0.2595
0.0138
0.1123
0.0292
0.0530
0.0493
0.0629
0.0437
0.0111
0.0266
0.0664
0.0256
0.0173
0.0344
0.0701
0.1678
0.0105
0.1013
0.1876
0.0367
0.0127
0.0561
0.0848
0.0299
0.0533
0.0360
0.0110
0.0155
0.0119
0.0312
0.1512
0.7200
0.0311
0.2546
0.0465 4952
[PART II-SEC. 3( 6 ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
2
4
3
11
0.0844
501 (Govt . Land)
500
0.0119
PARSUKHERI (Contd..... )
0.0564
506 (Govt. Land)
0.0948
505(Govt . Land)
512
0.1610
0.0810
508 (Govt. Land)
00105
510
0.0280
509 (Govt. Land)
527
0.1161
0.0278
526 (Govt . Land)
0.1211
525(Govt. Land )
523
0.0785
524
0.0109
520
0.0833
522
0.1901
535
0.0110
0.0246
521 ( Govt . Nala)
548
0.0347
549
0.1303
552
0.4038
0.1066
586
0.0281
584 (Govt. Land)
0.0153
583
0.0333
585(Govt. Land)
0.0166
582(Govt. Nala)
0.0460
561
559
0.3212
147
0.0100
142
0.0100
0.0400
220(Govt.Nala)
0.0200
311
12 BANSKHERI
29
0.0668
28
0.0232
23
0.0594
22
0.2584
0.0570
21
18
0.2290
14
0.3167
16
0.0305
15
0.0257
10
0.0214
62
0.0266
0.0821
9
0.3863
64
69
0.0485
0.2335
65
66
0.1331
132
0.0604
131
0.4853
123
0.1628
124
0.5648
122
0.0104
0.7518
120
85
0.0189
87
0.2182
0.4257
90
17
0.0145
68
0.0100 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4953
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
2
3 13 NIPANIYA BAIJNATH
180
179
178
177
176(Govt. Land)
175
174
173
172
171
169
167
164
163
162
106(Govt. Land)
108
111
113-
69(Govt. Rasta)
119
118
117
114(Govt . Land)
84
78
79
80
81 (Govt. Rasta)
392
400
391
390
389
388
385
386(Govt. Land)
387(Govt. Land )
472(Govt . Nala)
471
467
465
469
464
470(Govt. Rasta)
491
545
537
536
535
534
532
531
528
527
523
522
521
563(Govt. Land)
576
578 (Govt. Land )
584(Govt. Land) 1358Gl /2005-26
4
0.0376
0.0545
0.0203
0.0317
0.0124
0.0379
0.0358
0.0541
0.0813
0.0378
0.0769
0.1018
0.2028
0.0892
0.1437
0.0879
0.0808
0.1851
0.0763
0.0100
0.0350
0.0157
0.0304
0.0843
0.0501
0.0113
0.0513
0.0568
0.0151
0.0394
0.0111
0.0310
0.0142
0.0311
0.0335
0.0138
0.0151
0.0307
0.0128
0.0216
0.1102
0.0930
0.0598
0.0836
0:0184
0.2732
0.5037.
0.2585
0.0119
0.0282
0.0497
0.0893
0.0855
0.1000
0.1000
0.1084
0.0745
0.1264
0.1555
0.2559
0.2513
0.0429 4954
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24. 1927
2
3 13
583 NIPANIYA BAIJNATH (Contd.....)
579 (Govt. Land)
580
1249
1250
1251
1252
1246 (Govt. Land)
581
393
395
107
159
587
107(Govt. Land )
159 14 KASHI BARDIYA
613 (Govt . Land)
633
614
629
630
627
628
625
626
621
620/905
647 (Govt. Nala)
663
662
664
665
835
702
703
704
706
707
808
809
807
814
815
816
802
778
779
735 (Govt . Rasta)
772
622
667 (Govt. Nala )
803 15 BHIMLOD
299 (Govt . Land)
81(Govt . Nala)
298 (Govt . Land)
103
297 (Govt. Land)
296 (Govt . Rasta)
293
294
295
133 (Govt. Nala)
282 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4
0.0305
0.0955
0.1923
0.0715
0.1474
0.1381
0.1779
0.0559
0.0100
0.0100
0.0100
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.0300
0.0200
0.0202
0.0199
0.1079
0.1115
0.0721
0.0264
0.0541
0.0424
0.0176
0.0936
0.0340
0.0489
0.0609
0.0184
0.0504
0.0431
0.0654
0.0117
0.1052
0.1958
0.1572
0.0877
0.0988
0.3209
0.2099
0.1571
0.1261
0.1793
0.0.102
0.3037
0.1854
0.0170
0.0681
0.1000
0.0100
0.0100
0.5326
0.0340
0.5001
0.0536
0.0155
0.0248
0.1911
0.0348
0.0412
0.0497
0.0423 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4955
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
2
15
381 BHIMLOD ( Contd ..... )
389
390
388
397 (Govt. Rasta)
459
389
390
388
397 ( Govt . Rasta)
459
475
474
473
476
506
505
504
507
508
522
521
536
537
515
543
544( Govt. Rasta)
546
547
548
545(Govt . Rasta)
283 16 BAPACHYA
1126
1125
1124
1138 (Govt. Nala )
1099
1100
1098
1097
1055
1095
1094
1055
1057
1059
1060
1061
1043
1024
1023
1021
1020
1001 (Govt . Rasta)
1002
1003
908
899
898 (Govt . Rasta)
897
892
891
893 4
0.0170
0.0525
0.0173
0.0742
0.0281
0.0792
0.0525
0.0173
0.0742
0.0281
0.0792
0.1103
0.0362
0.0138
0.0712
0.0527
0.0538
0.0202
0.0348
0.0161
0.0553
0.1576
0.0688
0.0321
0.0210
0.0387
0.0565
0.0119
0.2339
0.0125
0.0689
0.0100
0.0465
0.0496
0.0366
0.0311
0.0783
0.1366
0.0149
0.0292
0.1173
0:0752
0.0457
0.0266
0.1480
0.0450
0.1172
0.0322
0.0820
0.1118
0.1163
0.0690
0.0602
0.1342
0.0418
0.1455
0.0266
0.1093
0.0159
0.1975
0.0817
0.1571
0.0227 4956
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
2
4
16
0.1226
888
BAPACHYA ( Contd ..... )
889
0.0126
882
0.0151
884
0.0239
883
0.0122
885
0.0764
886
0.0251
861
0.0449
862
0.0299
859
0.0030
860
0.0950
0.0261
858 (Govt . Land )
0.0604
819 (Govt . Land)
0.0534
825 ( Govt. Land )
0.3212
823 (Govt. Land )
0.0275
824(Govt. Road )
1122
0.0100
808
0.0155
0.0360
887 (Govt. Nala)
0.0125
813
814
0.0290
17 KARADIYA
0.4673
659 (Govt . Land )
616
0.1648
0.0703
617
618
0.1051
619
0.1141
0.0265
606 (Govt . Nala)
0.1124
595
596
0.2541
592
0.0152
0.2375
591
589
0.0327
0.0294
586
0.0155
537 (Govt . Nala )
0.0155
524
0.2406
523
0.2337
529
482
0.2446
0.0281
480(Govt. Nala)
0.2421
479 (Govt . Land)
[F.N. R- 31015/68 / 2004 - OR - 11 ]
HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 12 मई, 2005
का. आ. 1797.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा ( गुजरात ) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए; औरकेन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी प्नाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए; अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 को उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4957
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. राम करण शर्मा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम -कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान संख्या -1418 , सेक्टर 6 , बहादुरगढ़ , जिला झज्जर 124507 (हरियाणा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।
अनुसुची
तहसीलः पाटौदी
राज्यः हरियाणा
जिलाः गुड़गाँव
गाँव का नाम
हदबस्त संख्या
मुसतिल संख्या 1. घीलनावास
17
273
34
272
10 2. खलीलपुर
12
13
20
24
32
35 3. खेतियावास
11
268 4. बलेवा
6
271
9 5. गांगली
267
12
265
1 6. पहाड़ी
9
22 7. मौजाबाद
17
21 8. डाडावास
20
19
30
19
16 9. हकदारपुर
25
श्रेत्रफल
खसरा /किला
वर्गमीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
संख्या
21
00
36
03
00
06
33 17/2
03 21/1
00
01
12
00
01
1
00
60
00
25/1
4
01
00
37
00
00
62 24
00
54 18/1
00.
25
00
00
19/2
75
02
00
00
00
33 9/2
48 2/1
00 00
01
8/2
00
18
00
01
10/1
60
02
00
40
00
14
01
11/2
01
48 19
00
57 22
00
00
00
37
00
2
23 11
00
01
01
18
00
18
00
00
79 20
02
18
00
11
02
00
6/1
43 15
54
01
00 00
90 24/1
00
00
94
04
57 3 8/1
03
00
00
63 19
00
04
02
16/2
00
02
58 8
00
00
00
38 19 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
4958
राज्यः हरियाणा
जिलाः गुड़गाँव
तहसीलः पाटौदी
श्रेत्रफल
खसरा /किला
गाँव का नाम
वर्गमीटर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
संख्या
मुसतिल
संख्या
हदबस्त संख्या
10
00
00
80
37
१. हकदार पुर ( गारी )
00
65
00
11
00
00
52
21/2
42
00
00
58
17/2
00
00
68
1
25
16
10. शेरपुर
00
66
29
21/2
00
49
48
00
00
13/2
42
00
00
23/1
23/2
00
25
16
49
00
01
96
26
00
06
23
61
00
12,
00
00
97
19
00
00
37
8
12
10/1
11. राजपुरा
00
02
11/2
27
25
00
03
13
68
00
21
5
01
17
14
00
02
33
3
28
00
00
50
00
06
60
32
16/1
00
00
20/1
35
33.
[फा. सं. आर-31015/49/2004-ओ.आर- II ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 12th May, 2005
S. O. 1797.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat ) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described intheSchedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule , may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in 4959 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ram Karan Sharma, Competent Authority , Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , H. No. 1418 , Sector - 6, Bahadurgarh - 124507, District - Jhajjar ( Haryana) .
SCHEDULE
State : HARYANA Tehsil : PATODI
District : GURGAON
Area Name of Village
Hadbast No.
Mustil No.
Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are
Square Metre
03
17
21
00
36
273
1. GHILANAWAS
06
33
17/2
00
34
03
21/1
00
01
10
272
2. KHALILPUR
00
01
12
1
12
00
25/1
00
60
13.
01
20
4
00
37
62
24
00
00
24
18/1
00
00
54
19/2
00
00
25
02 : 75
ου
32.
9/2
00
33
2/1
00
48
35
00
01
18
11
8/2
268
00
3. KHETIAWAS
6
10/1
60
271
00
01 4. BALEWA
00
02
40
11/2
00
01
14
19
48
267
5. GANGLI
00
01
9
57
22
00
00
2
00
37
12
00
11
00
01
23
18
1
00
18
265
01 6. PAHARI
20
00
9
00
79
11
00
02
18
22
6/1
00
17
02
43
21
7. MOZZABAD
15
00
01
54
90
00
00
24/1
20
19
8. DADAWAS
94
04
30
3
00
57
03
8/1
00
63
00
00
19
02
04
00
16/2
16
19
9. HAKDARPUR
58
00
02
8
25
00
38
00
19
80
10
37
00 00
65
00
00
11
52
00
00
21/2
00
58
42
00
17/2 4960
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : PATODI
District : GURGAON
State : HARYANA
Area
Name of Village
Mustil No.
Hadbast No.
Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are
Square Metre
16
1
10. SHERPUR
00
68
25
00
66
29
21/2
00
00
49
13/2
00
00
48
00
00
23/1
42
23/2
25
00
00
16
49
26
00
01
96
61
12
00
06
23
00
00
97
19
00
37
10/1
12
00
8
11. RAJPURA
11/2
00
02
27
00
25
68
13
03
21
5
00
01
17
00
02
33
14
00
3
28
00
50
16/1
00
60
32
06
20/1
00
00
35
33
[No. R - 31015/49/2004 - O.R. - II ] .
HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 12 मई, 2005
का. आ. 1798.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में और भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं० का०आ० 3309 तारीख 23 दिसम्बर, 2004 का आशोधन करते हुए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन , राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र राज्यक्षेत्र , दिल्ली के भीतर हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की मुंद्रा - दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए श्री वी ०के ० मल्होत्रा, डानिक्स , एस.डी.एम. (नजफगढ़ ), राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र , दिल्ली सरकार को , उनके अपने कार्यभार के साथ- साथ, प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[फा. सं. आर-31015/6/2004- ओ.आर || ]
हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 12th May , 2005
S. O. 1798. In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) and in modification of notification of the Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 3309 dated the 23rd December , 2004 , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri V.K. Malhotra, DANICS , SDM (Najafgarh) , Government of NCT of Delhi to perform the functions of the competent authority for Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , in addition to his own duties , under the said Act , within the territory of NCT of Delhi .
[No. R-31015/6/2004 - O.R. - II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.
4961 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
श्रम मंत्रालय
DC - 18 Akanobha Palace , Kankarbagh , Patna for adjudication to thìs Tribunal :---
नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2005
"Whether the two domestic enquiries conducted by the management of United Bank o India , Patna in the case of Shri Sarat Chandra Srivastava , Cashier - cum- General Clerk were free from bias and were according to the Principles of Natural Justice and the punishment imposed on him isjust and legal ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to?" .
का.आ. 1799.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनाईटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3 ( सी) /2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011 /235/2003 - आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ] .
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR
New Delhi , the 20th April , 2005
2.Both the parties have filed their written statement and contested the reference . They have adduced evidence both oral anddocumentary . Worker Sri Sarat Chandra Srivastava has examined himself as lone witness for the worker, whereas management has examined three witness namely MW1 -Manoj Kumar, MW2 -Pramod Kumar and MW3 -Krishna Murari Prasad. Documents produced by the worker have been marked from Exts . W to M/ 21 and management's documents are marked from Exts . M to M/22.
S.O. 1799. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No.3 (C)2004 of the Industrial Tribunal PATNA (BIHAR) as shown in the Annexures in the industrial dispute between the management of United Bank of India , and their workmen, recevied by the Central Government on 19-04-2005
[No. L - 12011 /235 /2003 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA.
Reference Case No. 3 ( C) of 2004 .
The Chief Regional Manager , United Bank of India , Region . Abhay Bhawan (2nd Floor) Fraser Road , Patna and their workman reprsented by the Regional Secretary , United Bank of India Employee's Congress DC - 18, Akanohha Palace , Kankerbagh . Patna .
For the Management: Sri Manoj Kumar Sinha , Advocate
& Ors .
For the Workman : Sri V. N. Sahay, Advocate & Ors .
Present:
Priya Saran, Presiding Officer, Industial Tribunal Patna .
AWARD
Patna , dated the 7th April , 2005.
3. Bereft of unnecessary details , the worker's case as speltin his W.S. is that he has been serving in United Bank of India in clerical cadre since 1984. He was transferred to and from five to six times in between St. Columbus Branch, Hazaribagh and Rania Branch in year 1995 within the a span of 8 to 9 months . Higher Official were allegedly einpoyed withhis due his union activities as Unit Secretary . While posted at Rania Branclı he , as directed by Regional Office, reported to St. Columbus Branch . Hazaribagh on 25-11-97 for filling up duplicate House Building Loan From where he indulged in not exchange of words with Branch Manager on his objectionable utterances which resulted ina charge sheet dated 23-12-97 for riotous , disorderly and indecent behaviour and act prejudicial to Bank's interest. The worker was put under suspension the following day . The charges were held proved by enquiry and punishment was inflicted upon the worker . It is alleged by the worker in the W.S. that the domestic enquiry was conducted in unfair manner without observing the principles of natural justice . He was not allowed to be represented by an Advocate , timewas not allowed even on ground of open Heart Surgery of his defence representative , he was pressurised to conduct the enquiry himself and time was not allowed to prepare himself for cross - examining management's witnesses . It is further alleged that he has lost faith in the enquiry officer due to his favouritism and biasness . Documents called for were neither produced nor inspection thereof was allowed . He was not given adequate opportunity to defend himself and the finding of the enquiry officer is against materials on record . The enquiry proceeding is allegedly vitiated due to biasness of E.O. and non - observance of principles of natural justice.
4. Worker's W.S. further states that the management issued him during pendency of former enquiry a second Chargesheet dated 24-6-2000 for an incident of misconduct By the adjudication order No.L - 12011 /235/2003 - IR (B - II ) dated 8-3-2004 the Government of India , Ministry of Labour . New Delhi has referred , under Clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( herein after to be referred to as the Act ) , the following dispute between the management of United Bank of India , Region . Abhay Bhawan( 2nd Floor ) Fraser Road , Patna and their workman Shri Sarat Chandra Srivastava , Cashier - cum-General Clerk represented by United Bank of India Employees Congress-
1358 GI/2005-27 4962
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
dated 23-2-96, show cause where ofhad already been replied by the worker on 17-11-97 . It is alleged by him that this belated chargesheet shows the malafide of the management. The enquiry was conducted into this charge as well and the worker was held guilty and accordingly punished . This proceeding has also been attached by the worker alleging in the W.S. that documents called for by him were not produced by the management, he has lost faith in the E.O. for his bias and partisan attitude , the complaint which was the basis of the charge has set was not produced , the complainant rather deposed on behalf of the worker and the conclusion drawn from the enquiry is against the materials on record .
5. It isfurther sated in the W.S. that the findings of both the enquiries are perverse as none of the charges against the worker stood proved and the punishment imposed on him thereunder are excessive , harsh and disproportionate. The worker has accordingly prayed for an award in his favour .
6. The management has interalia, stated in the W.S. that both departmental enquiries were conducted properly in compliance with principles of natural justice and the workınan was allowed adequate opportunity to defend his case, he was given opportunity to verify the documents produced by the management , copies of documents were supplied to him . he alongwith his defence representative fully participated in the enquiry examined his witnesses , exhibiteddocuments and cross - examined management's witnesses . Written briefs of Presenting Officer and Enquiry Reports were provided to him for comments . He was also given personal hearing by the Disciplinary Authority before punishment was inflicted. The worker also preferr Appeals in both the cases and the punishments were upheld. Principles of Natural Justice have been adhered to in both the enquiries and there is no merit in the present reference and so liable to be disallowed .
7. Present reference has been made to basically adjudge whether two domestic enquiries against the worker Sarat Chandra Srivastava were free from bias and as per principles of natural justice . The punishment imposed on the worker is a subsequent issue and dependent on the findings on the former.
8. Admittedly , the management issued two charge sheets to the worker 1st on 23-12-97 and 2nd on 24-6-2000 . Enquiries were conducted seperatley into charges by different enquiry officers . The worker was held guilty under both the enquiry and he was accordingly punished whereby some annual increments were stopped by reduction of his basic pay by three stages in all is the time scale of pay . It is alleged by the worker that both the enquiries were conducted with biasness , he was not offered to properly defend himself, principles of natural justice were adhered to and the findings are against materials on record . The management on the other hand has
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] categorically rejected worker's stands with claims that the enquiries were fair and according to principles of natural justice and the findings are based on evidence .
9. The object of departmental enquiry is to find out the fact as to whether the charges could be established andif so , how?. Enquiry proceedings are some what free from rigid rules and restrictions , but none the less principles ofnatural justice must not be waylaid , otherwise it would vitiate.
10, I will first takeup the enquiry related with the chargesheet dated 23-12-97 . The worker had to visit St. Columbus College Branch of the Bank on 25-11-97 for fillings up application for house building loan as per instruction of the Regional Office . Allegedly, the worker flared of and created nuisance and noisy scene by hurling abuses and filthy languages at the Manager Sri Pramod Kumar. He was accordingly charge sheeted for " Riotious , disorderly and indecent behaviour in the premises of the Bank " and also " Doing set prejudicial to the interest of the Bank " . By enquiry, he was held guilty followed by punishment of reduction of basic pay by two stages in his time scale of pay.
11. Enquiry proceedings in five vols . (Exts. M/ 1 to M/5) have been filed by the management and also the photo copies of the Exhibited documents in another volume in respect of two enquiries ( Ext . M) . Other documents filed by the management are Ext . M/6 -Regional Manager's letter dated 11-3-98 to worker regarding enquiry . Ext . M/7 -K . O.'s letter dated 21-5-95 to worker regarding venue and date of enquiry . Ext. M/ 8 - Worker's time petition dated 13-6-98 on account of his D.R.'s heart operations . Ext . M/ 9- E.O.'s information about deferring enquiry to 19-7-98 , Ext . M/10- Worker'stime petition , Ext . M/ 11 -E.O.'s information about adjournment , Ext . M/ 12- information about venue of enquiry , Ext . M/ 13 - E.O.'s letter to Chief Regional Manager to release defence representative to participate in the enquiry, M/ 14 -D.R.'s letterto E.O. to fix some date in January . 1999 as he was going for his checkup , Ext . M/ 15 -E.O's letter to Chief Regional Manager dated 9-1-99 to release D.R.'s . Ext . M / 16- E.O.'s letter informing adjournment , Ext . M/ 17 - worker's time petitions dated 16-4-99 on account of his illness , Ext.M/ 18 -E.O.'s letter dated 29-4-99 regarding adjournment , Ext. M/ 19 - worker's petition to supply copies of some Exts . , and Ext.M/20 - Supply of written argument of presenting officers to the worker . By above documents , the management has tried to show that the worker was given adjournments as required by him for genuine cause and nothing was done at his back . It was submitted by the learned counsel for the management that the worker did participate in the enquiry at every stage and management's witnesses were cross - examined by him and the principles of natural justice have not been floutedat all .
12. Management's three witnesses namely MW1- Manoj Kuniar . MW2 - Pramod Kumar and MW3 - Krishna 4963 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
that this alone would be accepted as prejudicial to the worker.
17. It was vehemently argued by the learned counsel Murari Prasad have stated that they were cross - examined from worker's side during enquiry . MW1 and MW2 appeared as witnesses during first enquiry, whereas MW3 was a witness in the 2nd enquiry.
13. The worker as WW1 has stated on the other hand before this Tribunal that he was not given documents as required by him, proceeding was not adjourned even though his defence representative had undergone bye pass surgery of his heart , he conducted the enquiry himself under coercion and threat of ex -parte hearing , his prayer for engagement of a lawyer was also turned down and he had raised objection against the enquiry officer for his change . He has furhter stated that venue of enquiry was fixed at his request but that was changed suo-motu . During cross - examination , he has clarified that his defence representative on account heart ailment was not in a position to go to various places and accordingly , venue of enquiry was fixed at Patna with consent ofboth the parties, but that was without any prior information changed and shifted back to Hazaribagh . He was however informed verbally of the change ofvenue .
14. Worker has also filed many documents as detailed below Ext . W -Worker's petition to Manager , St. Columbus College branch for sending worksheet , Ext . W/ 1 -Regional's Manager letter dated 9-11-2000 to worker for verification of documents and submission of reply, W/2 - Worker's petition dated 14-12-2000 for verification of documents , Ext . W/3- Regional's Manager's letter for verification of documents , Ext.W/4- Worker's petition dated 20-4-2001 for lifting his suspension , Ext. W/5 - R.M.'s letter dated 30-10-2001 regarding verification of documents , Ext . W/6 - Worker's petition dated 10-10-2001 to Regional Manager to permit him verify documents, Ext . W/7- Worker's time petitiondated 25-7-2002 , Ext . W/8 - Worker's petition dated 19-6-2002 to R.M.to direct E.O. to conduct enquiry without adjournment , Ext. W/9- R.M.'s letter dated 9-4-2001 to worker for verification of documents , Ext. W/10 to W/ 15 -various Worker's petitions regarding verification and supply of documents and for the change of Enquiry Officer, Ext . W16- Circularragarding subsistance allowance, Ext . W/17 -revised D.A. Charts , Ext. W/ 18 - Worker's representation and Ext . W/ 19 -management's reply thereof, Ext . W/20 - Worker's pay slip and Ext . W/ 21 - Certificate about worker's basic pay.
for the worker that he was deprived of adequate and appropriate defence , by not allowing him to engage a lawyer since his defence representative had undergone heart surgery. It was further submitted that the worker was to conduct the enquiry himself under threat of proceeding ex-parte and he being a men not versed with technicalities could not defend himself properly . He referred besides the evidence of WWI on this point , various documents and also the proceedings of certain dates . Ext : M/8 is a prayer for adjournment by the worker to adjourn the proceeding on account of inability of his defence representative to move on account of serious heart surgery. The Enquiry Officer in response to above letter though adjourned the proceeding but asked the worker to remain present on 9-7-98 with his D.R. , otherwise the enquiry would proceed ex -parte . Likewise , other documents namely Exts . M/ 10 , M/ 11 , M/ 17 and M/ 18 are suggestive of the fact that every time the worker was being asked to participate in the enquiry under threat of ex -parte hearing . We find from the enquiry proceeding that venue was fixed at Patna in view of heart trouble of the defence representative with agreement of the Presenting Officer on 31-7-98 . But subsequently, vide Ext . M/ 12 the Enquiry Officer on his own changed his mind without hearing the parties and shifted the venue to St. Columbus College , Hazaribagh . He should at least have heard the worker before taking any new decision- in such matters . This change of venue was certainly not suitable to a heart patient as defence representative was and probably on this account he could not attend the proceeding and the worker himself was compelled to a conduct the caseunder threat of going it ex -parte . Worker's request to change his defence representative and engage a Advocate was rejected by the E.O. on 18-5-1999 . This we find noted on pages 208 to 211 of the proceeding . We further find from the proceeding that defence representative alloted to the worker finally left attending the proceedings from 4-2-99 onwards . The Enquiry Officer in his order while rejecting the engagement of legal practitioner has stated that it is noted in paragraph 19 ( 12 ) of Bipartite settlement that a delinquent is not entitled to engage a lawyer if the Presenting Officer is not a legal practitioner or Advocate . I don't see any sense is this stand or interpatation adopted by the Enquiry Officer . Paragraph 19 ( 12 ) of the Settlement has been quoted by the Enquiry Officer himself at page 11 . ofhis enquiry report , which runs as follows : - " 19-12. The procedure in such cases shall be as follows:-
15. Enquiry proceedings with respect to charge sheet dated 23-12-97 runs in about 400 pages . 1 have carefully gonewith all caution through the entire proceeding . I have further gone through the enquiry report submitted by the EnquiryOfficer.
(a) In employee against whom disciplinary action is proposed or likely to be taken shall be given a charge sheet ...... he shall also be permitted to be defended-
( i) (x) by a representative of a registered trade union of Bank employees of which he is a member on the date first notified for commencement of enquiry .
16. By and large , the Enquiry Officer has taken care of Worker's prayer in the matter of adjourning the proceeding . excepting once when his request to defer was not allowed which was prayed on the ground of his wife's illness and her appointment with doctor . I do not think 4964
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ( y ) where the employee is not a member of any trade union of Bank employees on the aforesaid date by a representative of a registered trade union of employees of the Bank is which he in employed:
OR
(ii ) At the request of the said union by a representative of the state federation or All India Organisation to which such union is affiliated;
22. We further notice from enquiry record that the worker had in mind that the E. O was not impartial and was carrying a bias against him. He had lost faith in him . Record on pages 42, 43 and 216-220 reveals that such petitions were also filed before the E.O. But the prayer to stay his hands from recording evidence , as the worker intended to go before Disciplinary Authority , was turned down on 19-5-99 . The sort ofhigh handedness exhibited by the E.O. has just to be imagined.
( iii ) With the Bank's permission , by a lawyer" .
23. It is obviously desirable that only disinterested and unbiased Officers should be oppointed Enquiry Officersin a departmental proceeding . As a rule. the person who undertakes this task , should not be suspected of any bias in such cases . Whenever an application is moved by the chargesheeted employee against the E.O. on the grounds ofbias , the proceeding, as a matter of rule should be stayed and the application referred alongwith relevant materials to the appropriate reviewing authority for considering the application and passing appropriate order thereon. Settled position is that when a representation is received from delinquent employee to change E.O. on the ground of bias, the issue has to be decided not from the point of view of employer but from the angle of delinquent employee and all that is necessary for concideration in such position is whether a man of reasonable prudence , if placed in similar circumstances as that of delinquent would have thought the E.O. to be biased against him .
24. The E.O. by not staying his hands when petitions such as DE- 5 were filed and in not despatching the same to the appropriate authority for review and order thereon , has certainly massacred the Principles of Natural Justice .
18. Clause 19.12 is thus no bar to the engagement of a lawyer. it simply requires a permission from the Bank . Materials on record reveal that the defence representative was seriously ailing from heart trouble and had undergone a byepass surgery. On this account , the venue of enquiry was fixed at Patna in agreement of both the parties but all of a sudden and without any hearing as well , the E.O. reverted back to former venue at Hazaribagh . This resulted is regular interruption in D.R. ` s attending the enquiry with compulsion on the worker to conduct the enquiry himself in his absence under threat of its going ex-parte . It is well apparent from Ext .-M- series that D.R. could not attend the enquiry on 9-9-98 , 21-10-98 , 14-11-98 to 17-11-98, 22-12-98 and4-2-99. He thereafter could never attend the proceeding . In his absence , the worker had to cross . examine the witnesses and was compelled to participate in the enquiry under threat of carrying it on ex -parte . Worker's request to defer the enquiry was twice rejected on 17-5-99 . His praye for the engagement of another D.R. was turned down on 18-5-99 . A prayer to engage a lawyer by him was also rejected on 18-5-99 itself. All above is borne out from DE -9 , DE - 100 and proceeding pages 208-211 and the enquiry report page - 11 .
25. Apart from above , some documents were called for by the worker but liis prayer was arbitrarily disallowed on 4-2-99 . One would find about this on pages 172-173 of theproceeding.
19. It can bejust imagined from all above as to under what degree of agony , tension and pressure , the worker would have been during his D.R.'s absence . He is admitedly in Clerical Cadre and not conversant with technicalities and the ways to advance his defence in appropriate and impressive manner . He has been grossly prejudiced by E.O.'s orders .
20. One would fail to understand in facts and circumstances above , as to why the worker was disallowed to the chege of his D. R. or engaging a lawyer. I must say that no reasonable man would have rejected worker's such prayer in then prevailing circumstances .
26. We thus find that the E.O. has not acted in that faimess which is desirable of an impartial , prudent and reasonable person with no bias and partisan . Needless to say, that the record of the proceeding glaringly exhibits that principles of natural justice have been shattered almost at every step and E.O.'s action cannot be justified. The enquiry into chargesheet dated 23-12-97 has not been fair and in accordance with established norms of natural justice. The enquiry is thus held vitiated . The findings arrived at on such enquiry and the punishment on this basis would thus fail.
21. It is well settled that if the charges are serious which the workman would not be in a position to defend himseit. He can be perinitted to avail the services of a lawyer a there is no rule specifically prohibiting the engagement of a lawyer . By disallowing the worker to change his D.R. and/or engaging a lawyer , the E.O. has definitely gone beyond established legal norrus and there has been thus a clear violation of principles of natural justice.
27. 1 would now take up the next enquiry related with chargesheet dated 24-6-2000 for consideration . The worker while in Cash Department received a deposit of Rs. 500/- from one Niranjan Singh Kherwar but tore away the deposit slip and threw the pieces into basket. He stands further charged as making false declaration before the Bank whether he is the only son of his parents or there are other brothers . The Enquiry Officer on enquiry held both the 4965 [भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
charges proved. The worker was accordingly punished of reduction of one increment in the time scale .
reasons aforesaid, this enquiry also stands vitiated, and so the findings thereon and also the punishment inflicted upon the worker cannot be maintained .
28. The enquiry has been attacked by the worker as being against the principles of natural justice , lose of faith in the Enquiry Officer and his findings being against the record.
29. The enquiry proceedings is there in Ext . M/5 and runs from pages 45 to 71. The enquiry report is separately filed before me. I have thoroughly gone minutely through the proceedings .
35. In view of what has been discussed above and materials on record, I am of firm opinion and accordingly held as such that both the domestic enquiries conducted by the management of United Bank of India , Patna in the case ofworker Sri Sarat Chandra Srivastava were not free from bias , Principles of Natural Justice were not followed while conducting the enquiries , the findings thereon are against the record and cannot be acted upon. Both the enquiries stand vitiated for reasons aforesaid and the punishment iinposed on the worker on the basis of such enquiries is not at all maintainable.
36. Award accordingly .
PRIYA SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1800.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । 30. The first charge against the worker relates to a deposit of Rs. 500/ -made by one Niranjan Singh Kherwar . As per chargesheet the money was handed over to the worker who tore away the deposit slip . When the matter came to light he deposited the amount at the fag end of cash received by a new deposit slip . Surprisingly, above Niranjan Singh Kherwar has tsupported the management . He was rather examined by the worker and stated in clear words that he had handed over the money to the Branch Manager . His evidence at pages 69 onwards clearly mentions that he never handed over Rs . 500 to the worker for depositing in the account as alleged in the chargesheet . Therefore, charge No. 1 in the chargesheet clearly fails for not being supported by Niranjan Singh Kherwar. Yet, the Enquiry Officer has came to the findings that the charge stands proved.
[सं. एल-12011/195/2002 - आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th April , 2005 31. Apart from above , certain documents including complaint against the worker were required by the delinquent but his prayer was rejected by the Enquiry Officer on 23-7-2002 as saying that the documents were irrelevant: I fail to understand as to how the complaint petition , which was the basis of the charge was held irrelevant by the E.O.
S.O. 1800.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/ 2003) of the Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 19-04-2005
[No. L- 12011/ 195/2002 - IR(B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .
32. The worker was informed vide Ext. M/21 that the letter of complaint was not relevant in management's opinion since not included in the list of documents pertaining to the letter of charge . This has been highly ridiculous on part of the management in denying the copy ofcomplaint , which is the basis of charge against him. Be that as it may , there has been clear violation of the principle ofnatural justice.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:
33. So far second charge is concerned , the Enquiry Officer has held the game proved just saying that the " typing inistake " pleaded by the worker is not tenable and charge of false declaration therefore has been fully proved. This argument advanced by the E.O. in holding the charge proved is just inconsistent with established legal norme and cannot be accepted .
SHRI B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer. Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under section 10( 1 )
(d) ofthe I. D. Act , 1947
REFERENCE No. 24 of 2003
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management of Bank of India , Patna and their workman .
34. We thus find that the findings of the Enquiry Officer in relation to both the charges contained in charge- sheet dated, 24-6-2000 are quite perverse and can be accepted. Besides above , there has been a clear violation of principles of natural justice when required documents were not supplied or allowed perusal to the worker. For 4966
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
APPEARANCES :
None
Onbehalf of the workman Onbehalf of the employers
Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate .
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Banking .
Dated, Dhanbad, the 29th March , 2005 .
AWARD
TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise if the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the 1. D. Act . 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L- 12011/195/ 2002- IR( B - II ) , dated the 31-1-2003/ 10-2-2003.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, Patna denying special allowance drawing assignment by declaring that Shri P.C. Mehta isjunior due to re - designation which is not a promotion justified ? If not , what relief is the concerned workman entitled to ?"
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared . Management however made appearance through their learned Advocate . Record shows that consecutive notices were issued to the workman side but in spite of issuannce of notices they failed to turn up before this Tribunal . Gesture of the workman/sponsoring union if is taken into consideration will expose clearly that they are not interested to proceed with the hearing of this case . Under such circumstances , this Tribunal also finds no ground to adjourn the case suomoto for days together only for causing appearance of the workinan. Hence , the case is closed . Accordingly a ' No dispute ' Award is passed in this reference presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ.. 1801.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 126/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011/ 150/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 20th April , 2005
S.O. 1801. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 126/ 2004) ofthe Cent. Govt. Indus . Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 19-04-2005 .
[No. L - 12011 /150/2004 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT :
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 126/2004
L-12011/ 150/ 2004- IR (B - II) dated : 9-11-2004 BETWEEN :
The Assistant Secretary :
National Confederation of Bank Employees , UP, NCBE , 128/301 , K. Block , Kidwai Nagar,
Kanpur(UP)-0 (In the matter of Sh . Alok Sharma) AND
The Regional Manager Punjab National Bank Regional Office, Reedganj , Faizabad-0. AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L - 12011 / 150/2004- IR (B - II) dated : 9-11-2004 referred the following dispute for adjucation to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Lucknow.
Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in imposition of punishment of reduction in stage on Shri Alok Sharma is legal and justified? If not, what relief is the concerned workman entitled to?"
The said order was marked to the Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow besides the Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank, Regional Office, Reedganj , Faizabad and The Assistant Secretary, National Confederation of Bank Employees , UP, NCBE , 128/301 , K. Block, Kidwai Nagar, Kanpur(U.P. ).
Itwas made clear to the parties raising the dispute to file the statement complete with relevant , decuments , list of reliance and witnesses with the Tribunal within fifteen daysofthe receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such a statement to each one of the opposite [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4967
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
parties involved in this dispute under rule 10 (B) of the Industrial Disputes (Central ) , Rule , 1957 .
The said order of reference was received in the office ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Lucknow on 31-12-2004, but the Assistant Secretary, National Confederation of Bank Employees did not file any statement of claim , challenging the imposition of punishment of Shri Alok Sharma. When the Assistant Secretary , National Confederation of Bank Employees did not filed the statement of claim together with the relevant documents , list of reliance and witnesses etc. till 28-1-2005, registered summon was sent to the Assistant Secretary, National Confederation of Bank Employees vide postal receipt No. 42 dated 7-2-2005 . The registered article returned with the remark ' not met ' on 9-2-2005 and 10-2-2005 .
The Assistant Secretary of the said confederation did not file any statement of claim, alleging that the punishment imposed by the Punjab National Bank on Alok Sharma was illegal or unjustified.
The Regional Manager , Punjab National Bank . Faizabad was also issued registered notice and the representative of the said Bank appeared in the Court , but he did not file any written stateinent .
There is no material available on the record to arrive on the conclusion as to whether action of the management was legal or illegal , justified or unjustified, In the circumstances. I have no other option than to pass No Claim Award.
Lucknow
8-4-2005
SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1802. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के वीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 125/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011 /147/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 20th April, 2005
S.O. 1802. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 125 / 2004) of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum-Labour Court .
Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-04-2005 .
[No. L- 12011/ 147/2004- IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT , LUCKNOW
PRESENT :.
SHRIKANT SHUKLA , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 125/2004 L- 12011/147/2004- IR (B - II) dated : 9-11-2004 BETWEEN :
The Assistant Secretary:
National Confederation of Bank Employees , UP, NCBE , 128/301 , K. Block, Kidwai Nagar , Kanpur(UP) -0 (Inthe matter of Sh. A.N. Dhawan)
AND
The Regional Manager
Punjab National Bank Regional Office, Reedganj , Faizabad-0 . AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide their order No. L - 12011/ 147/ 2004 - IR ( B - II ) dated : 9-11-2004 referred the following dispute for adjucation to the Cental Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Lucknow .
Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in imposition of punishment of reduction in stage on Shri A.N. Dhawan is legal and justified? If not, what relief is the concerned workman entitled to? "
The said order was marked to the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Lucknow besides the Regional Manager , Punjab National Bank , Regional Office , Reedganj , Faizabad and The Assistant Secretary , National Confederation of Bank Employees , UP, NCBE , 128/301 , K. Block , Kidwai Nagar , Kanpur (U.P. )
It was made clear to the parties raising the dispute to file the statement complete with relevant decuments , list of reliance and witnesses with the Tribunal within fifteen days / ofthe receipt of the order of the reference and also forward a copy of such a statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in this dispute under rule 10 ( B ) of the Industrial Disputes ( Central) , Rule , 1957 .
4968
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
The said order of reference was received in the office of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow on 31-12-2004, but the Assistant Secretary, National Confederation of Bank Employeesdid not file any statement of claim , challenging the imposition ofpunishment of Shri A. N. Dhavan . When the Assistant Secretary. National Confederation of Bank Employees did not filed the statement of claim together with the relevant documents , list of reliance and witnesses etc. till 28-1-2005 , registered sumnion was sent to the Assistant Secretary, National Confederation ofBank Employees vide postal receipt No. 42 dated 7-2-2005 . The registered article returned with the remark ' not met ' on 9-2-2005 and 10-2-2005.
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii)]
अनुबन्ध
न्यायालय : न्यायाधीश , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, उदयपुर
उषाअग्रवाल, आर.एच.जे.एस. , पीठासीन अधिकारी प्रकरण संख्या : 9/99
(औद्यो. विवाद )
श्री सुरेश कुमार आचार्य
.... प्रार्थी पुत्र श्री लक्ष्मण जी, निवासी हास्पीटल रोड, उदयपुर
बनाम
रीजनल प्रबंधक,
बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया
The Assistant Secretary of the said confederation did not file any statement of claim , alleging that the punishınent imposed by the Punjab National Bank on A. N. Dhavan was illegal or unjustified.
.... विपक्षी रीजनल कार्यालय राजस्थान रीजन नाकोड़ा हाऊस , सी-63-8 , पी.बी. नं. 346 , सरोजनी मार्ग सी-स्कीम, जयपुर (राज.)
उपस्थित:
:
श्रीअरुण व्यास
The Regional Manager , Punjab National Bank, Faizabad was also issued registered notice and the representative of the said Bank appeared in the Court, but he did not file any written statement .
There is no material available on the record to arrive on the conclusion as to whether action of the inanagement was legal or illegal , justified or unjustified . In the circumstances . I have no other option than to pass No Claim Award.
Lucknow : 8-4-2005
SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1803.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, उदयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/91/ 1999 - आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 20th April , 2005 S.O. 1803. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/99 ) of the Industrial Tribunal , Udaipur as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofBank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 19-04-2005 .
[No. L - 12012/ 91/ 1999 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .
प्रार्थी की ओर से ।
विपक्षी की ओर से ।
श्री तेज प्रकाश शर्मा :
दिनांक: 16-12-2004
पंचाट
भारत सरकार के श्रम विभाग द्वारा जरिये पत्र क्रमांक : एल- 12012/91/99/आई.आर. ( बी- II ) दिनांक 25-8-99 द्वारा निम्न आशय का प्रसंग इस न्यायालय को निर्णय हेतु प्रेषित किया गया । "Whether the action of management Bank of India in terminating service of Sh . Suresh Kumar Acharya S/ o Sh. Laxmanji Ex. Daily Rated Employee w.e.f. 14-5- 97 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to? "
उक्त आशय का प्रसंग प्राप्त होने पर न्यायालय द्वारा दिनांक 14-9-99 को वाद संख्या : 9/99 दर्ज रजिस्टर किया जाकर पक्षकारान कोनोटिस जारी किये गये । जिस पर प्रार्थी की ओर से क्लेम व विपक्षी कीओर से जवाब पेश किया गया ।
संक्षेप में क्लेम प्रार्थना पत्र के तथ्य इस प्रकार हैं कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्तिविपक्षी के अधीन दिनांक 14-5-97 को दफ्तरी के पद पर हुई तभीसे वह नियमित सेवा में रहा तथा वह नियमित कर्मकार की परिभाषा में आता है । प्रार्थी की सेवाएं सदैव संतोषप्रद रहीं , अपने सेवाकाल में कभी उसने शिकायत का मौका नहीं दिया, न ही प्रार्थी को कभी कारण बताओ नोटिस या चार्जशीट ही दी गयी । प्रार्थी प्रातः 9 बजे से सायं 6 बजे तक काम करता तथा आवश्यकता पड़ने पर रात्रि 8 बजे तक भी उससे काम कराया जाता था । प्रार्थी को विपक्षी शुरू में 900 रु. प्रतिमाह देता था तथा सेवाओं से प्रसन्न होकर उसने प्रार्थी को दि. 1-5-95 से 1200 व दिनांक 20-5-96 से 1500 रु. वेतन दिया । प्रार्थी का कार्य नोटों के बंडल बनाना , बांधना, सिलना, स्लिप व छाप लगाना, दैनिक वाउचर फाइल बनाना, अन्य फाइलिंग करना, डाक वितरण करना, बिल संग्रहण [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
करना आदि कार्य जो स्थायी प्रकृति के कार्य हैं । जब प्रार्थी ने समान कार्य के समान वेतन व स्थायीकरण की मांग की जिस पर विपक्षी ने हैड आफिस से सम्पर्क करने का निर्देश दिया जिस पर प्रार्थी ने हैड आफिस पर प्रार्थना पत्र पेश किये तो अचानक दि. 14-5-97 को सेवा में लेने से इंकार कर सेवा पृथक कर दिया तथा उसके स्थान पर जगदीश कुमार मीणा को नियुक्त किया है जो आज भी कार्यरत है तथा अन्य कनिष्ठ कर्मचारी आज भी कार्यरत हैं । प्रार्थी को न तो सेवा पृथक करने का कारण या आधार बताया, न आदेश दिया न नोटिस या नोटिस के एवज में वेतन दिया न ही छंटनी मुआवजा दिया, इस प्रकार प्रार्थी की सेवामुक्ति शून्य व अवैध है । निवेदन किया गया कि सेवा पृथक करना अनुचित व अवैध एवं शून्य घोषित फरमाकर दिः 14-5-97 से सेवा में निरन्तरता एवं अन्य सेवा लाभ सहित पुनः सेवा में रखने तथा बकाया वेतन फिक्सेशन, एरियरं व अन्य समस्त लाभ, अन्य कोई राहत जो उचित लगे मय कार्यवाही खर्च दिलायी जावे ।
विपक्षी ने अपने जवाब में बताया है कि प्रार्थी को दि. 31-3-95 को बैंक दफ्तरी के पद पर केवलमात्र आकस्मिक कार्य की आवश्यकता की पूर्ति हेतू दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में रखा गया था , उसे कोई नियुक्तिपत्र नहीं दिया. न ही किसी प्रकार की नियुक्ति दी। प्रार्थी बैंक का कर्मकार नहीं था तो उसे कारण बताओ नोटिस, चार्जशीट देने का प्रश्न ही नहीं उठता । इस बात से इंकार किया है कि प्रार्थी से प्रातः 9.00 बजे सायं से 6.00 बजे तक आवश्यकता पड़ने पर रात्रि 8.00 बजे तक काम लिया जाता हो । इस बात से भी इंकार किया है कि प्रार्थी की सेवाओं से प्रसन्न होकर उसका वेतन 900 से बढ़ाकर 1-5-95 को 1200 व 20-5-96 को 1500 कर दिया हो । प्रार्थी को कभी हैड आफिस से सम्पर्क करने के निर्देश नहीं दिये गये क्योंकि प्रार्थी बैंक कर्मकार नहीं था। जगदीश कुमार की नियुक्ति बैंक के नियमानुसार की गयी है । प्रार्थी बैंक का कर्मचारी नहीं था, वह केवलमात्र आकस्मिकं कार्य की आवश्यकता की पूर्ति हेतु दैनिक वेतन पर रखा गया था, उसे स्थायी पद पर नहीं रखा गया न ही किसी प्रकार की नियुक्ति दी गयी । अतः प्रार्थी किसी भी प्रकार का कोई रिलीफ प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है । प्रार्थना की गयी कि प्रार्थी का स्टेटमेन्ट ऑफ क्लेम मय हर्जा- खर्चा खारिज फरमाया जावे ।
प्रार्थी की ओर से अपने क्लेम प्रार्थना पत्र के समर्थन में स्वयं का शपथ पत्र व विपक्षी की ओर से श्री चन्द्रकान्त कुरे, प्रबन्धक, बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया का शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत किया गया। दोनों पक्षों ने एक दूसरे से जिरह की । दस्तावेजी साक्ष्य में कोरियर रसीद, प्रार्थी का प्रार्थना पत्र, ए.डी. रसीद, बिल प्रमाण पत्र वाउचर, पास- बुक, फाईल विवरण , पेमेंट विवरण, पिओन बुक, दैनिक वाउचर की छाया प्रतियां प्रस्तुत की गयीहैं।
उभय पक्षकारान् की बहस सुनी गयी व पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया तथा उभयपक्षकारों द्वारा लिखित बहस प्रस्तुत की गयी उसका भीअवलोकन किया गया । प्रस्तुत प्रकरण में हमें यह देखना है कि प्रार्थी श्रमिक को नियोजक द्वारा सेवा से पृथक किया जाना उचित एवं वैध है ?
प्रार्थी ने क्लेम प्रार्थना पत्र समर्थन में साक्ष्य स्वरूप शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है जिसमें कथन किया है कि वर्ष 1993 में बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया शाखा, उदयपुर में दफ्तरी के पद पर कार्यरत था तथा वर्ष 95 में 1358 GI /2005-28
4969 मेरा स्थानान्तरण विपक्षी के अधीन हुआ तभी से नियमित सेवाएं देता रहा, सेवाएं सदैव संतोषप्रद रहीं, कभी शिकायत का मौका नहीं दिया न मुझे कभी कारण बताओ नोटिस दिया न विवेकावरण के आरोप लगे न विभागीय जांच ही हुई । मेरी सेवाओं से संतुष्ट होकर ही क्पिक्षी ने मेरा वेतन 900 रु. से बढ़ाकर 1-5-95 से 1200 रु. कर दिया । मुझसे डाक विवरण, बिल संग्रहण आदि स्थायी प्रकृति के कार्य करवाये जाते थे , जो संतोषप्रद थे, परन्तु जब मैंने विपक्षी से समान कोर्य के लिए समान वेतन व स्थायीकरण की मांग की तो विपक्षी ने हैड आफिस से सम्पर्क करने का निर्देश दिया । जिस पर. मैंने हैड आफिस को इस बाबत प्रार्थना पत्र लिखा तो विपक्षी ने अचानक दि. 14-5-97 को मुझे सेवा में लेने से इंकार कर सेवा से पृथक कर दिया । विपक्षी ने सेवा से पृथक्र करने से पूर्व न तो मुझे सेवा पृथक करने का कारण बताया न आदेश दिया न नोटिस या नोटिस के एवज में वेतन दिया न छंटनी मुआवजा दिया , जिससे मेरी सेवा मुक्ति अवैध व शून्य है । विपक्षी ने मात्र श्री जगदीश मीणा को लाभान्वित करने के लिये मुझे सेवा पृथक किया है तथा उसे मेरी ही तरह दैनिक वेतन पर लगा कर फिर स्थायी कर लिया । जबकि वह अंशकालीन था व मैं पूर्णकालीन था । इस तरह विपक्षी ने भेदभावपूर्ण तरीके से अनफेयर लेबर प्रैक्टिस अपना मुझे स्थायी करने की बजाय सेवा पृथक किया जो अवैध व शून्य है ।
प्रार्थी ने विपक्षी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा की गयी जिरह में बयान दिया है कि बैंक ने मुझे कोई नियुक्ति पत्र नहीं दिया । बैंक ने मुझे कार्य संतुष्टि का प्रमाण पत्र नहीं दिया था । 1993 में देहली गेट उदयपुर शाखा में काम करता था । यह बात गलत है कि 1993 में मुझे नौकरी से हटा दिया हो । चित्तौड़ शाखा में स्थानान्तरण का लिखित में नहीं दिया मौखिक आदेश दिया था । यह गलत है कि बैंक में आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में काम करता रहा हूं । खुद कहा कि नियमित रूप से काम पर जाता था । मेरेसाईन परमानेंट कर्मचारियों के साथ में नहीं होते थे । यह सही है कि भुगतान के समय वाउचर पर साईन लेते थे । यह सही है कि देहली गेट ब्रांच में नियमित कर्मचारी काम कर रहे थे । खुद कहा कि चित्तौड़ शाखा में मैं ही केवल नियमित कर्मचारी था । मैं नवीं क्लास पास हूँ । दि. 31-3-95 को मैंने चित्तौड़ शाखा में जोईन किया यह शाखा 30-3-95 को खुली थी । यह सही है कि बैंक में मेरे पद की रिक्ति हेतु कोई विज्ञापन नहीं निकाला और न ही मैंने कोई आवेदन पत्र भेजा खुद कहा कि मुझे चित्तौड़ में रिजनल मैनेजर ने काम के लिये भेजा था । यह सही है कि चित्तौड़ में मेरे स्थान पर नियमित कर्मचारी स्थानान्तरित होकर आया तब मुझे हटा दिया । यह सही है कि बैंक में मेरा पद केवल एक ही था । यह गलत है कि मुझे संविदा के आधार पर रखा गया हो । यह गलत है कि मुझे कहा गया हो कि नियमित कर्मचारी के आने पर तुम्हें हटा देंगे । खुद कहा कि मुझे बैंक वालों ने कहा कि तुम्हें स्थायी कर देंगे । 1997 में मैंने कितने दिन काम किया याद नहीं फिर कहा कि 14 मई तक काम किया था । 14 मई, 97 को नियमित कर्मचारी उदयपुर से स्थानान्तरित होकर आ गया था हटा दिया था ।
विपक्षी की साक्ष्य में श्री चन्द्रकान्त कुरे, प्रबंधक बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया उदयपुर ने मुख्य परिक्षण में प्रस्तुत शपथ पत्र में कथन किया है किप्रार्थी का यह कथन गलत है कि उसकी भर्ती दि. 31-3-95 को 4970
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART I-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
प्राप्तिका कोई पृष्ठांकन नहीं है । एग्जीः 37 से एग्जी 86 तक स्लिीप में हैं, जो वाउचर के ऊपर लगायी जाती हैं । यह गलत है कि प्रार्थी का हमारे यहां च.श्रे. कर्म. का पद रिक्त हो उस पद पर दैनिक वेतनभोगी के रूप में लगाया हो ।
बैंक में दफ्तरी के पद पर हुई थी, क्योंकि बैंक में कभी भी उसे कोई नियुक्तिपत्र नहीं दिया व न ही उसे कभी वेतन ही दिया । प्रार्थी अप्रार्थी बैंक का कर्मकार ही नहीं था तो उसे कारण बताओ नोटिस या चार्जशीट देने का प्रश्न ही नहीं उठता है । प्रार्थी श्रमिक को केवलमात्र आकस्मिक कार्य की आवश्यकता की पूर्ति हेतु दैनिक वेतनभोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में रखा गया था, उसे किसी भी स्थायी पद पर किसी प्रकार की नियुक्ति नहींकी गयी थी । विपक्षी बैंक में ऐसी कोई व्यवस्था नहीं है कि प्रार्थी की सेवासे प्रसन्न होकर उसका वेतन 900 से बढ़ाकर 1-5-95 से 1200 रु. प्रतिमाह कर दिया गया व दि. 20-5-96 से 1500 रु. कर दिया गया हो । प्रार्थी को कभी भी मुख्यालय (हैड आफिस ) से सम्पर्क करने के निर्देश नहींदिये गये । प्रार्थी को केवल मात्र आकस्मिक कार्य की आवश्यकता की पूर्ति हेतु दैनिक वेतनभोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में रखा गया था । उसे स्थायी पद पर किसी प्रकार की कोई नियुक्ति नहीं दी गयी थी । अतः ऐसे व्यक्तियों को किसी प्रकार का नोटिस देने का प्रश्न ही उत्पन्न नहीं होता है । जगदीश कुमार मीणा की नियुक्ति की गयी है , जो कि बैंक के नियमानुसार की गयी है ।
उभय पक्षकारों की साक्ष्य व पत्रावली पर प्रस्तुत दस्ताविजात एग्जी 19 से लगायत एग्जी 26 जो कि प्रार्थी को दिः 31-3-95 से दिः 15-5-97 तक विपक्षी द्वारा भुगतान किया गया, उसके वाउचर विवरण है, जिसको देखने से प्रकट होता है कि प्रार्थी को दैनिक वेतन के हिसाब से प्रत्येक सप्ताह वेतन दिया जाता था । मासिक वेतन नियत नहीं था तथा जब - जब दैनिक वेतनभोगी कर्मचारियों की मजदूरी बढ़ी तो प्रार्थी की मजदूरी भी बढ़ गयी । बैंक के द्वारा प्रार्थी को किसी पद पर नियुक्तिनहीं दी गयी है । विपक्षी के बयानों से यह सिद्ध है कि चित्तौड़ शाखा दिः 30-3-95 को खुली थी व प्रार्थी ने दिः 31-3-95 से लेकर 14-5-97 तक कार्य किया है । यह एग्जी 19 से लगायत एग्जी: 26 को देखने से प्रकट होता है, जिसके मूल विपक्षी के पास हैं, जिन्हें विपक्षी ने पेश नही किया है न ही इन दस्तावेजों को गलत बताया है । जिससे यह प्रकट होता है कि प्रार्थी ने साप्ताहिक अवकाश व सार्वजनिक अवकाश को छोड़कर निरन्तर कार्य दिः 31-3-95 से 14-5-97 तक किया है । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी को सेवा से पृथक किये जाने से पूर्व प्राथी ने विपक्षी बैंक में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य किया है , आकस्मिक कर्मचारी केरूप में तथा यह विवादित नहीं है कि जब उसे सेवा से पृथक किया तब उसे न तो नोटिस दिया न नोटिस की एवज नोटिस पेमेंट दिया गया और न ही छंटनी मुआवजा दिया गया । प्रार्थी की सेवाएं संतोषजनक नहीं थी ऐसा विपक्षी का आक्षेप नहीं है । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी की छंटनी धारा : 25 - एफ औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की पालना किये बिना करना उचित एवं वैध नहीं है । प्रार्थी व विपक्षी द्वारा प्रस्तुत विधि दृष्टांत तथ्यों की भिन्नता के कारण हस्तगत प्रकरण में लागू नहीं होते हैं । प्रार्थो आकस्मिक कर्मचारी था वह मौखिक आदेश से रखा गया था त रखा जा सकता था तथा मौखिक आदेश से ही उसकी छंटनी की गयी है । उसकी जगह नियमित कर्मचारी को बैंक नियमों के अनुसार लगाया गया है । ऐसी स्थिति मे प्रार्थी को पुनःनियोजित किया जाना उचित नहींहै । सभी परिस्थितियों पर विचार करने के उपरांत प्रार्थी को एक मुश्त क्षतिपूर्ति राशि स्वरूप विपक्षी से रुपये 10000 दिलाया जाना उचित समझते हैं । विपक्षी प्रार्थी को यह क्षतिपूर्ति राशि 10000 रु. पंचाट प्रकाश से दो माह में अदा करें अन्यथा प्रार्थी उपरोक्त राशि पर छः 6 प्रतिशत वार्षिक दर से ब्याज भी प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी होगा । तथा राशिअदा होने पर विपक्षी के प्रार्थी के प्रति बतौर श्रमिक औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के अंतर्गत सारे दायित्व समाप्त हो जायेंगे ।
भारत सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित प्रसंग क्र. एस 12012 / 91 /आईआर (बी- II ) दिनांक 25-8-99 को उत्तरित करते हुए पंचाट इस प्रकार पारित किया जाता है कि प्रबंधक बैंक आफ इंडिया द्वारा श्रमिक श्री सुरेश कुमार आचार्य पुत्र श्री लक्ष्मण जी दैनिक वेतनभोगी कर्मचारी को दिनांक 14-5-97 से सेवा पृथक किया जाना उचित एवं वैध नहीं था । इस अवैधानिक सेवा समाप्ति के परिणामस्वरूप प्रार्थी श्रमिक श्री प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा की गयी जिरह में साक्षी ने बयान दिया है कि प्रार्थी को किसी विशिष्ट कार्य को कराने के लिये आकस्मिक रूप से काम पर रखने की कोई स्वीकृति ली हो । आज खुद कहा कि स्वीकृति लेने की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं थी । यह सही है कि प्रार्थी 1993 से उदयपुर की दो ब्रांचों में काम करता था, उसके वाद चित्तौड़ आया । आज खुद कहा कि प्रार्थी आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में काम करता था । आज खुद कहा कि चित्तौड़ हमने नहीं भेजा मेरे को वक्तिगत जानकारी इस मामले की नहीं है , जो जानकारी है वह रकाईने. आधार पर ही है । दफ्तरी व क्लास फोर्थ का एक ही पद होता है, फि कहा कि दफ्तरी वक्लासफोर्थ एक ही कैडर है । आकस्मिक श्रमिक को का पर लगाने के लिये कोई नोट्स नहीं बनाया जाता है, इसलिये नोट्स नहीं बनाया । आज खुद कहा कि जब कोई छुट्टी पर जाता हैब आकस्मिक श्रमिक लगाते हैं । चित्तौड़ ब्रांच में प्रार्थी ने काम किया उस अवधि में उस ब्रांच में कौन कर्मचारी अवकाश में था मैं नहीं बता सकता । चित्तौड़ शाखा में दफ्तरी का एक ही पद था । यह गलत है कि प्रार्थी को शुरू में 900 फिर 1200 और आखिर में 1500 रु. वेतन दिया हो। आज खुद कहा कि प्रार्थी का वेतन निर्धारित नहीं किया गया था । प्रार्थी को अब- कव कितना भुगतान किया मुझे पता नहीं । आज खुद कहा कि प्रार्थी को सीधे भुगतान नहीं किया जाता था बल्कि मैंने को पुर्नभरण होता था । यह सही है कि प्रार्थी को बैंक का काम करने के लिये लगाया था । प्रार्थी से साढ़े सात घंटे काम लेना निर्धारित था । चित्तौड़ शाखा में दफ्तरी का एक ही पद था । चित्तौड़ में नई शाखा खुली थी आज खुद कहा । प्रार्थी ने चित्तौड़ में क्या काम किया मुझे पता नहीं । डेली वेजेज कर्मचारियों से क्लास फोर्थ का काम कराया जाताहै । प्रार्थी को उसकी सेवाएं समाप्त करने के लिये नोटिस नहीं दिया क्योंकि प्रार्थी को कोई नियुक्ति नहीं दी । यह गलत है कि प्रार्थी को पद रिक्त होने के कारण काम पर लगाया हो । एग्जी 01 से 04 पत्र हमारे कार्यालय में आये हों तो मुझे जानकारी नही । आज खुद कहा कि इस पर [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
सुरेश कुमार आचार्य अपने उपरोक्त नियोजक विपक्षी प्रबंधक बैंक आफ इंडिया से क्षतिपूर्ति राशि रुपया 10000 ( दस हजार रु. ) प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी है । विपक्षी प्रार्थी को यह क्षतिपूर्ति राशि रुपया 10000 पंचाट प्रकाशन से दो माह में अदा करें अन्यथा प्रार्थी उपरोक्त राशि पर 6 ( छः ) प्रतिशत वार्षिक की दर से ब्याज प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी होगा तथा यह राशि अदा होने पर विपक्षी के प्रार्थी के प्रति बतौर श्रमिक औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के अंतर्गत सारे दायित्व समाप्त हो जायेंगे । पंचाट प्रकाशनार्थ भारत सरकार को भेजा जाये । पंचाट आज दिनांक 16-12-2004 को खुले न्यायालय में लिखाया जाकर सुनाया गया ।
उपा अग्रवाल, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 14. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के वीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पलाकड के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या 23/2003 ( सी) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -12011 / 165/2002- आई.आर. ( बी. 11 ) ]
सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव .
New Delhi , the 20th April , 2005 S.O. 1804.- 1n pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award [ Ref. 23 / 2003 ( C ) ] of the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Union Bank Of India and their workmen . recevied by the Central Government on 19-04-2005
[No. L - 12011/ 165/2002 -IR ( B- II) ]
C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD .
(Monday , the 21st March 2005/30th Phalguna 1926) PRESENT :
Sri B. Ranjit Kumar, Industrial Tribunal Industrial Dispute No. 23/2003 ( C) BETWEEN :
The Chairman and Managing Director Union Bank of India . 239. Vidhan Bhawan Marg , Nariman Point , Mumbai -400021 . ;
(By Adv. K. K. Premt Lal )
4971
AND
Sh.T.Moideenkutty , Thyyil House , Maniyamkadu , Naduvattom (Via) , Kuttippuram , Malappuram District .
(By Adv . K. K. Suresh Lal )
AWARD
The facts leading to this industrial dispute have been stated in the Preliminary order dt . 20-1-2005 whereby this Tribunal held that there is no procedural defect in the domestic enquiry conducted against the workman . For the sake of brevity and to avoid repetition , the said preliminary order is extracted hereunder :-
Preliminary Order
2-1 . The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 12011 / 165/ 2002 IR ( B - II ) dated 15-11-2002 referred the following issues for adjudication :-
"Whether the termination of service of Shri T.Moideenkutty , Head Cashier of Pottessery Branch ofUnion Bank of India by an order of compulsory retirementby the management of Union Bank of India islegal andjustified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
2-2. There was a mistake in the original reference order dated 15-11-2002 wherein the name of the adjudicator was wrongly mentioned as the Labour Court , Palakkad which was later rectified by issuing a corrigendum notification dated 27-1-2003 by which the name of the adjudicator has been corrected as Industrial Tribunal Palakkad .
2-3. In response to the suinmons issued to the parties both of them entered appearance through their respective counsel . The workman filed his claim statement dated 12-6-2003 and rejoinder dt. 22-1-2004 contending inter alia that he had not committed any misconduct as alleged by the management and the findings of the Enquiry Officer that he is guilty of the charges is perverse and the Enquiry Officer did not give him reasonable opportunity to adduce evidence .
2-4. On the other hand , the management would submit in its written statement dt. 17-10-2003 that the oral and documentary evidence adduced in the enquiry would clearly prove all the charges against the workman and that the Enquiry Officer was impartial and the workman was afforded sufficient opportunity to adduce his evidence .
2-5. In view of the above pleadings of the parties, the preliminary point to be considered is whether the domestic enquiry held into the charges against the workman is legal and valid.
2-6 . The management has produced the enquiry file as Ext . Ml . a perusal of Ext . Ml shows that the workman participated in the enquiry thorughout with the assistance ofSri C.A. Jameskutty who was the General Secretary, the 4972
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
Union Bank of India employees Union Kerala . He has cross- examined the management witnesses in the enquiry.. After closing the management's evidence , the Enquiry Officerhad asked the defence representative on 29-9-2000 to lead defence evidence . The defence representative submitted that there are no documents or witnesses in support of his case . However, he wanted to submit a written statement. Accordingly the Enquiry Officer concluded the enquiry on 29-9-2000 . The written submissions of the defence representative which was received by the Enquiry Officer on 13-11-2000 forms part ofExt . MI enquiry file. The Enquiry Officer has considered the written submission of the defence representative in his report dated 17-3-2001 .
2-7 . In the light of the foregoing discussion , it . would be observed that the workman was given all the reasonable opportunities to defend his case . In fact , at the time of final hearing , the learned counsel for the workman did not point out any procedural defect or denial of principles of natural justice in conducting the domestic enquiry .
2-8. However , at the time of final heraring the workman's counsel submitted that the enquiry is vitiated for the reason that the disciplinary authority himself acted as Enquiry Officer . In reply, the learned counsel for the management submitted that in view of Ext . M2 staff Circular No. 2309 dt . 28-5-1981 , the disciplinary authority is authorised as Enquiry Officer as well and hence there is no illegality or irregularity in conducting the enquiry by the disciplinary authority .
2-9 . The relevant portions of Ext . M2 circular read asfollows:
"In supersession of all the previous Notices and Staff Circulars authorising certain Officers /Executives as Enquiry Officers to take disciplinary action against workmen staff subordinate in rank to such Enquiry Officer . thedisciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority respectively are hereby appointed as per the Schedule hereto .
The Disciplinary Authority appointed herein is authorized to institute disciplinary action in keeping wit! Chapter XIX on the settlement on Industrial Dispute between certain Banking Companies and their workmen dated 19th October , 1966 as modified by the Settlement on Industrial dispute between the said parties dated 22nd November , 1979 .
The disciplinary authority herein may himself hold an enquiry or direct any officer of the Bank to hold an Enquiry and another officer to represent the management's case . Having so directed , the disciplinary authority may in his discretion at any stage transfer holding of the enquiry from one officer of the bank to another and/ or transfer the task of
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] representing the management's case from one management representative to another.
2.10 . The management has produced Ext . M3 settlement dated 19-10-1966 also , pursuant thereto Ext . M2 circular was issued, A conjoint reading of Ext . M2 and M3 would make it clear that the very fact that the enquiry was conducted by an officer who is the disciplinary authority by itself will not vitiate the enquiry .
2-11 . The learned counsel for the workman placed strong reliance on a decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in Saji v/s . District Court - 2000 ( I ) KLT 767 in support ofhis contention that the same person should not act as the Enquiry Officer and disciplinary authority . In Saji's case, the disciplinary action was initiated at the instance of a District & Sessions Judge and he himself acted as Enquiry Officer,disciplinary authority and Imposed penality . In the circumstance, the Hon'ble High Court observed that if the same person acts as the Enquiry Officer and the disciplinary authority that would lead to the apprehension that the Enquiry Officer is biased and there is violation of the principles of natural justice.
2-12 . In the case at hand , the disciplinary action against the workman herein is seen initiated persuant to a report submitted by the Branch Manager of the Management-Bank and the chargesheet was issued by a Manager attached to the Industrial Relations Department , Central Office, Mumbai in his capacity as the disciplinary authority . He had also appointed vide memodt. 31-3-2000 Sri . Y. Ram Mohan Rao Deputy Manager (P) , General Manager's Office, Chennai as the Enquiry Officer. It may be true that Sri Ram Mohan Rao was also clothed with powers of disciplinary authority . However , it is a fact that hewas not involved at the initial stages of taking disciplinary action against the workman. In the circumstance , there can be no room for any apprehension of bias prejudice or violation of the principles of natural justice on the part of the Enquiry Officer. In fact , the workman had not taken such a contention during the course of enquiry or thereafter. 2-13 . For the foregoing reasons , the decision in Saji's case has no relevance or application in the present case .
2-14 . The learned Counsel for the workman has also placed reliance on a decision of the Supreme Court in Amarnath Chowdhary V. Braithwaite & Co. Ltd . ,-AIR 2002 SC 678. In this decision , the Supreme Court has dealt with the grievance of an employee that the Managing Director who had acted as the disciplinary authority also actively participated in the hearing of his appeal by the appellate authority . As already pointed out hereinabove , in the case at hand, the officers who had initiated the disciplinary action and conducted - the enquiry are different persons . These officers were not the members of the appellate authority . Therefore , the above Supreme Court case has 4973 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
also no relevance in the present case .
2-15 . In the light of the foregoing discussion , I hold thatthere is no procedural defect in conducting the domestic enquiry against the workman. Ordered accordingly.
Post this l.D. to 17-2-2005 for hearing the findings of the Enquiry Officer and proportionality of the punishment ofdismissal .
Findings of the Enquiry Officer
3. The charges levelled against the workman as per. chargesheet dated 3-2-2000 are as follows:
the amount on 10-12-99 and that the cash shortage was adjusted . The party , Sri Joseph Mathew has also given letter dt . 10-12-99 (MEX-4 ) corroborating the contents of the letterdt . 10-12-99 submitted by the workman . However he retracted froin the statement given in the first letter, dt. 10-12-99 by submitting another letter dt . 22-12-99 wherein it is stated that he had given such a letter as requested by the delinquent workman . Of course, there are some discrepancies in the contents of his letterdt . 22-12-99 as pointed out by the counsel for the workman . However , the letter dt . 10-12-99 of the delinquent workman itselfwould clearly show that he had made the excess payment of Rs . 28,000 Therefore , it was for him to explain the circumstances under which he had made the payment .
8. The specific case of the management is that 14 pieces of 500 denomination notes in court sections were found missing at the time of internal audit . The amount payable to Sri Joseph Mathew on 9-12-99 was Rs . 80,604 . Forthispurpose, it was not necessary to take four sections of500 denomination notes. If the amount was given in 500 denominations , one full section and 61 pieces of 500 denomination notes alone were required . In other words , only two sections need be taken from the cash chest for thispurpose . It has been clearly established that 14 pieces of 500 denomination notes were found missing in four sections . Therefore , the story of giving excess payment to one party by the delinquent workman cannot be believed .
"Shri Moideenkutty removed 14 PCs of Rs . 500 ' denomination notes from four sections amounting to Rs. 28,000 from the cash safe and misappropriated the amount for his personal gains . During regular inspection of Pottassery Branch as on 9-12-99 Inspecting officials of zonal Audit Office, Chennai found cash shortage of Rs . 28,000 from 4-12-99 to 9-12-99 . Shri Moideenkutty deposited an amount of Rs . 28,000 on 10-12-99 informing branch officials that he had paid excess cash to one of the customer Shri Joseph Mathew on 9-12-99 and informed having received back the amount . Shri Moideenkutty misusing his position as staff of the branch influenced Shri Mathew to give him letter that he had received excess cash so as to conceal the misappropriation of Rs . 28,000 and deposited the same when pointed out by the auditors . "
9. Even assuming that the subsequent letters were given by Sri Joseph Mathew at the instance of the management , the admission of the delinquent workman thathe had paid the excess payment of Rs . 28,000 is sufficient to hold that he was responsible for the shortage ofRs . 28,000 on 9-12-99.
4. The management examined two witnesses and produced Ext . MEX- 1 to 12 documents in the enquiry in support of the above allegations against the workman. The workman did not examine any witness nor produced any document in support of his defence.
10. It is submitted by the workman that he alone cannot be made liable for the shortage as the cash safe was under thejoint custody along with another officer by name Sri C. V. Sankaran who was not proceeded against . In my view, when it is unconditionally admitted by the workman by his letterdt. 10-12-99 that he had paid excess cash , he alone can be made liable for the cash shortage . Therefore , his contention that another officer is also responsible for the cash shortage is found to be untenable .
5. The first witness examined by the management is the thenBranch Manager who was in- charge of Pottassery Branch of the management-bank where the workman had committed the alleged misconduct on 9-12-1999 . This witness has stated in the enquiry that he was on training from 8-12-1999 to 10-12-99 and he was made known to the above incident on 13-12-99 when he returned to thebranch . Therefore, the evidence of this witness may not be much relevant .
11. In the light of the foregoing discussion , it would be seen that there is sufficient evidence in the domestic enquiry to hold that the workman is guilty of the charges . In the circumstances , there is no reason to interfere with the findings of the enquiry officer. In other words , the finding of the Enquiry officer are found to be correct as they are based on legal evidence in the domestic enquiry .
6. The second witness examined by the management is one of the internal auditors who had conducted the inspection of the Pottassery Branch on 10-12-99 . He has stated that on verification of cash balance as on 9-12-99 , a cash shortage of Rs . 28,000 in 500 denomination was noticed.
Proportionality of Punishment
12. The punishment imposed on the workman as permemo dated 10-4-2001 is compulsory retirement . There 'can be no doubt that the misconduct proved against the 7. The delinquent workman has given the letter dt. 10-12-99 (MEX - 3 ) to the Branch Manager stating that the cash shortage of Rs . 28,000 on 9-12-99 was due to excess payment made to one party and the said party had repaid 4974
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
workman is so grave as to remove him from the service of the management - bank. When the management lost confidence in an employee who was working as Head Cashier in a public fmancial institution like the management- bank . it will not be desirable to retain him service .
13. However , in the present case , there are no adverse remarks in the past service record of the workman herein . I am of the view that when extreme punishment is proposed , it is necessary to consider the past service record of the workman . The management has not disputed the submission of the workman that during the period of his service from 1982 to 1999 , he had been doing everything possible for the betterment of the bank and he had been given several good service entries. The branch Manager of the management who was examined in the enquiry has admittedthis fact . The workman is physically handicapped by birth and now he is aged 49 years . Accordingto him, he has no land properties and other source of income to lookafter his two unmarried daughters and a son . These personal matters may not be releant while considering the punishment. However , in view of the fact that he was a good employee without any blemish in his past service record. I feel that it would be only fair and proper to show some leniency in the matter of punishment by extending him the benefit of voluntary Retirement Scheme ( VRS ) which is in force or to be enforced in near future .
14. In the result , an award is passed holding that the termination of service of Sri D. Moideenkutty, Head Cashier of Pottassery Branch of Union Bank of India by an order of compulsory retirement by the management of Union Bank of India is justified . However , for the reasons stated above , the management is directed to explore the possibility of including him in the VRS and given him the benefit after adjusting the terminal benefits if any already received by him. The reference order is answered accordingly .
Dated this the 21st day of March 2005 .
B. RANJIT KUMAR , Industrial Tribunal .
APPENDIX
Witnesses examined on the side of Management . Nil Witnesses examined on the side of Workman . Nil Documents marked on the side of Management .
Ext.M1-Enquiry file.
Ext. M2- Staff Circular No. 2309 dt . 28-5-1981 .
Ext . M3-Memorandum of settlement dt. 22-11-1979 .
Documents marked on the side of workman . Nil नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1805.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दक्षिण- मध्य रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के वीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में, केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं ० 1 , हैदराबाद के पंचाट
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] (संदर्भ संख्या 3/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था!
[सं. एल-41012/122/1995 - आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] वी. एम. डेविड, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st April , 2005 S.O. 1805. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I. D. No. 3 of 1997) of the Industrial Tribunal /No . I , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between employers in relation to the management of South Central Railway and their workman , recevied by the Central Government on 20-04-2005
[No. L-410012/ 122 / 1995-1R ( B - 1 ) ] B. M. DAVID , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- I , HYDERABAD PRESENT :
SRIM.E.N. PATRUDU,
Chairman , Industrial Tribunal - l Dated: 15th day of February , 2005 Industrial Dispute No. 3 of 1997
BETWEEN :
... Petitioner Sri M. Jangaiah , S/ o . Narayana , C/ o . M. Panduranga Rao , Advocate, (H-7) 2-2-8/40/10 , B. D. Colony , Near Ahobil Mat . Bagh Amberpet . Hyderabad.
And
The Chief Personnel Officer,
Office of the General Manager ( Personnel Branch) South Central Railway ,
...Respondent Railnilayam , Secunderabad .
Appearances :M/ s . M. Panduranga Rao , M. V. Rama Rao . Advocates for the petitioner .
Sri. A. Pruthvi Raj . Advocate for the Respondent .
AWARD
1.00 The dispute is whether the action of Chief Personnel Officer, S. C. Railway , Secunderabad in terminating the services of Shri M. Jangaiah w.e.f. 22-2-1992 iwithout conducting any enquiry is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled?
2.00 The reference is received through No. L -41012/122/ 95 IR (B - I ) from the Ministry of Labour , New Delhi.
3.00 Both parties appeared .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
4.000 The petitioner filed claim statement and the respondent filed counter.
5.00 Claim Statement :
The claim of petitioner is that he was appointed as Bungalow Peon by the respondent through proceedings dated 22-9-1992 and he was posted in the house of Secretary to General Manager , South Central Railways , Secunderabad by name Sri Raghuramaiah .
5.01 Petitioner further stated that the petitioner was removed from service by Assistant Personnel Officer through proceedings dated 14-12-1993 and the removal is w.e.f. 17-12-1993 .
5.02 The case of petitioner is that without assigning any reasons he was removed from service and it is also stated that the petitioner signatures were obtained forcibly as the termination was arbitrary , he filed Ο.Α. Νο . 1632/1993 before Central Administrative Tribunal , Hyderabad Bench and the same is withdrawn as there is an alternative remedy . Accordingly he approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C ) -I and there were joint discussions and the respondent aggrieved to reinstate the petitioner but failed to do so . And thereafter refused to reinstate him hence the reference is made .
5.03 The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 84442/1996 before Hon'ble High Court of A. P. and the said Writ Petition was disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a petition before the concerned Labour Court directly and in the meanwhile Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal .
5.04 The petitioner was drawing Rs . 1642/- at the time of removal and he has put up more than one year of continuous service as such he cannot be removed except under section 25 (F ) of I. D.'Act and retrenchment compensation of 15 days was also not paid. It is stated by the petitioner that the respondent has paid only Rs . 2642/ - on 17-12-1993 instead of Rs. 3.400/-,
5.05 It is also stated that after termination of the petitioner's services respondent appointed a person by name N. Ravinder .
5.06 The petitioner is challenging the order of termination and praying for reinstatement .
6.00) The respondent filed the counter denied all the allegations . In para one at page 2 it is stated that petitioner was appointed as Substitute Bungalow Peon vide office order No. EST/ 184/92 issued under letter No. P /EST/269 /Vol . VII dated 22-9-1992 subject to the terms and conditions as stipulated therein .
6.01 It is further stated that the appointment of petitioner is not on regular basis . It is only a Substitute Bungalow Peon attached and the services are
4975 domestic in nature and his appointment is governed by the terms and conditions as stipulated in the offer of appointment order itself and the petitioner accepted the same joined the service and he was terminated w.e.f. 17-12-1993 strictly by complying the terms and conditions of the appointment order .
6.02. Thus it is stated that the petitioner is not a regular employee and services are not regularized and probation is not been clear and it is only the substitute services and as per the terms and conditions of the appointment order is still have to continue.
6.03 It is stated that there is no right to the petitioner to continue and his continuation of service is as required by the officer to whom he was attached .
6.04. It is stated that the one month salary required retrenchment compensation paid to him as per rules . It is further stated that the termination of service is governed by rules contemplated in para 301 of Chapter 3 of Indian Railway Establishment Code I 1985 ( Annexure R - III ) which provide for issue of 14 days' notice and the sum equivalent to the amount of his pay and allowances in lieu of notice period and they are statutory in nature.
6.05 The respondent has taken a plea that the petitioner is not workman and the dispute is not maintainable .
7.000 Evidence affidavit of WWI is filed and Exs -W1 to W6 are marked for petitioner and evidence affidavit ofMW I and MW2 filed Exs -M1 and M2 marked .
8.00 Heard arguments of both sides .
9.00 The point for my determination is :
Whether the termination of the workman without conducting any enquiry is justified ?
Whether the workman is entitled for any relief?
10.00 DISCUSSION ON POINT :
The admitted fact is the appointment of the petitioner. The petitioner himself deposedas WW1 that he was appointed as Bungalow Peon to work in the Bungalow of Secretary to Chief Manager by an order dated 22-5-1992 .
10.01 MW1 the Assistant Personnel Officer confirmed that hewas appointed with the respondent .
10.02 The dispute is whether the petitioner is appointed as Regular Bungalow Peon or Substitute Bungalow Peontherefore a perusal of appointment order will clarify.
10.03 APPOINTMENT ORDER :
It isa office order issued by General Manager's Office, Personnel Branch , Secunderabad vide reference No. P. EST/269 /Vol. VII dated 22-9-1992 this document is 4976
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
an admitted document .
10.04 The contents of this document discloses that the petitioner was appointed as Substitute Bangalow Peon in a Scale Rs . 750-940 ( ESTP) on pay ofRs. 750 p.m. and is to be attached to the Bungalow of Secretary to General Manager , therefore I hold that petitioner was appointed as Substitute Bungalow Peon not a Regular Bungalow Peon .
10.05 Further Ex- W1 discloses various conditions with regard to the conditions of the service of the petitioner.
10.06 The 1st condition is that while serving as Bungalow Peon and before completion of 3 years he has to apply and get selected into Class IV post .
10.07 The 2nd condition is that on completion of service of 3 years continuous his observation will initially be only as a Bungalow Peơn and if he is found suitable for observation and Class IV service he will be transferred to the regular establishment .
10.08 The 3rd condition is that his observation initially in the post for Bungalow Peon is subject to his suitability and absorption in regular Class IV service on completion of 3 years service is further subject to the condition that his service as a Bungalow Peon continue to be satisfactory.
10.09 Thus the close perusal of the above conditions discloses that the petitioner was not appointed on a regular basis and he has to complete 3 years of continuation service as Bungalow Peon to get an absorption initially into Bungalow Peon and if he is found suitable then he will be absorbed into Class IV. Therefore it is very clear the period of3 years he has to complete as Bungalow Peon complete satisfactory he can be absorbed initially as Bungalow Peon and thereafter he can claim for Class IV service .
OFFICE ORDER NO . EST/ 92
Shri M. Jangaiah , S/o . M. Narayana , having been found fit in Medical Classification C - II vide MS /LGD's fit certificate No. 016141 of 18-9-1992 is appointed as Substitute Bungalow Peon, in Scale Rs . 750-940 (ESTP ) on pay Rs . 750/- p.m. and is to be attached to the Bungalow of Secretary to General Manager , subject to the following conditions as stipulated in this office letter No. P /R/564/BP dt. 27-3-1985 :
1. If while serving as Bungalows Peon and before completion of 3 years as Bungalow Peon , he applies for and gets selected for appointment to Class IV post . he will be assigned proforma position in such postaccording to his turn on panel .
2. On completion of 3 years continuous service as Bungalow Peon . his absorption will initially be only as Bungalow Peon , and if he is found suitable for
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] absorption in Class IV Service he will be transferred to the regular establishment when the Officer to whom he is attached is transferred to another station on S.C. Rly , or to other Railway or ceased to be eligible to have a Bungalow Peon attached to his post. In case no vacancy is available he shall continue to work as such against Gazetted post from which the officer is transferred out of the Railway or to a post which a Bungalow Peon is not attahced.
3. His absorption initially in the post of Bungalow Peon is subject to his suitability and absorption in regular ClassIV Service on completion of 3 years is further subject to the condition that his service as a Bangalow Peon continue to be satisfactory .
4. In the event of his services as a Bungalow Peon are not required by an officer either before or after completion of 3 years service and is declared unsuitable for absorption in regular class IV establishment he will have no title to be transferred to the regular establishment and the services will be terminated without assigning any reasons , giving him the requisite notice and/ or payment of retrenchment compensation as admissible under rules .
10.10 Plain reading of the + condition discloses that if the service of Bungalow Peon are not required either before or after completion of 3 years service or the services are declared as suitable for absorption as regular Class IV establishment , he will have no title to be transferred and his services will be terminated without assigning any reasons but by giving notice and by payınent of retrenchment compensation as admissible under rules .
10.11 Thus under this condition the respondent is having every authority to terminate the services of the petitioner without assigning any reason and by giving him a requisite notice and payment of requisite compensation.
10.12 If his services are not required by the officer either before or after completion of 3 years , if lie has declared unsuitable for absorption in regular clause IV workman.
10.13 Under any of these two conditions are available his services can be terminated .
10.14 The specific case of respondent is that the officer to whom the workman was attached did not want him to be Bungalow Peon as such his services are terminated.
10.15 Ex -W2 is the termination order , it is dated 14-12-1993 . Therefore this order was issued much before the completion of 3 years . The termination order discloses that the service of workınan the substitute Bungalow Peon attached to the Secretary to General [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
Manager are terminated w.e.f. 17-9-1993 and the order also discloses that he shall be paid one month salary and also reinstatement compensation equivalent to 15days.
10.16 The copy of this order is communicated to the workman as well as to the officer to whom the workman is attached.
10.17 Ex - W2 discloses that the copy is submitted to the Secretary to General Manager South Central Railway: for information with regard to the Note No. GP 535 / Class IV/Vol . II/dt . 7-12-1993 .
10.18 This reference is very important reference. Ex-W2 was marked through the petitioner and it was admitted by the respondent . In this document reference note ofSecretary to General Manager referred as GP 535/ Class - IV/Vol . /T - 2 /93 was referred. The said reference note dated 7-12-93 i.e. , prior to issuance of termination dated 14-3-1993 .
10.19 MW2 is the Officer in whose Banglow workman was posted as substitute Banglow Peon and it is admitted that the workman is attached to MW2 . Through MW2 Ex - M2 is marked . Ex - M2 is note GP 535 /class- IV/Vol . II therefore the reference of Ex - M2 is mentioned .
10.20 Ex - M2 is reproduced here under:
10.21 The performance of Shri M. Jangaiah , working as substitute Bunglow Peon in my Quarter , who was appointed vide your O.O. NO . 184/92 issued under Letter NO . P /EST.269/Vol . VII . , dt . 22-09-1992, is not atall satisfactory . Whenever he is sent on some work, he takes abnormally long time and tries to evade the work entrusted to him. Some items are found missing in the house whenever he is in the Quarter and other members are not present . The purpose for which he has been appointed is not being served and therefore his services may please be terminated with immediate effect.
10.22 Plain reading of Ex-M2 discloses that MW2 has informed the Office that the performance of workman as substitute Bunglow peon is not at all satisfactory and the reasons are assisgned to prove unsatisfactory service .
10.23 It is clearly mentioned that the purpose for which he has been appointed is not being fulfil as his services may please be terminated with immediately effect .
10.24 Thus it is very clear that after receipt of this letter MW2 i.e .. Secretary to General Manager to whom the petitioner is attached as Banglow peon Ex - W2 is issued.
10.25 As per condition 4 of Ex- W1 the service of Banglow peon can be terminated if the services are not required by an officer. Therefore the 1st ground of the 4th condition is totally followed.
1358 G1/2005-29
4977 10.26 Having accepted the condition No. 4 the workman cannot raise hue and cry because he has to work to the satisfactory of the officer as per condition No. 4.
10.27 When Ex - W2 was issued on the basis of Ex - M2 and it is purely in accordance with the condition ofEx -W1 . Hence I hold that the workman has no claim for reinstatement and the order of termination islegal..
10.28 In this case the respondent has contended that the termination of workman was issued invoking the condition No. 4 of Ex -W1 and the said termination is governed by rules contemplated in para 301/adjudication III . I Indian Railway 1985 condition and these rules are having statutory authority as they are issued by the President of India under the powers conferred on him under Article 309 of Constitution of India .
10.29 They are independent/ statutory provisions applicable to the Railways .
10.30 It is a forcible contention and I fully agree with the contentions of the counsel for the respondent . These rules are also applicable to the case of petitioner therefore the termination of petitioner cannot be considered as reinstatement in I.D. Act . As per rules and as per conditions No. 4 the one month pay in lieu of month notice is paid and the 15 days compensation also has paid and wagefrom 1-12-1993 to6-12-1993 they are all admitted.
10.31 Therefore the respondent has taken all necessary directions before issuing the Ex- W2 and followed theprocedure after issuing the Ex- W2 the termination order.
11.00 In the instant case petitioner workman was appointed as substitute Banglow peon he has not a regular service he is to put up 3 years to claim regular basis . And thereafter his services should be satisfactory and can be considered regular class - IV services . The termination of service on temporary railway dealt in with rule 301 is very clear that by giving one month notice and pay paying 14 days compensation etc. , the service can be terminated and there is no need for any disciplinary proceedings or enquiry .
12.00 Since the workman is not a regular employee and he is not put up 3 years of service to claim the post of regular Banglow peon and he has accepted condition No.4 of Ex- W1 and as there is a communication through Ex -M2 for termination of his services I hold that there is no necessary to held any domestic enquiry or departmental enquiry before terminating the services of the workman . Thus I hold that the respondent is fully justified in issuing Ex - W2 and it is a legal .
4978
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
13.00 POINT NO . 2
Since the termination of the workman isjustified and legal he is not entitled for any relief.
14.00 RESULT
In the result , I hold that termination of workman M. Jangaiah by the respondent is legal andjustified and the workman is not entitled for any relief and accordingly the reference is answered .
Dictated to the Shorthand Writer transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 15th day of February , 2005 .
M.E.N. PATRUDU, Chairman APPENDIXOF EVIDENCE
Witness examined för Witness examined for respondent
petitioner
MW1 : S.M. BASHA WWI : M.JANGAIAH
MW 2 : K. RAGHURAMAIAH Documents marked for the Petitioner Ex-WI: Xerox copy of the office order dated 22-9-92 of the respondent appointing the petitioner as Substitute Banglow Pune .
Ex-W2: Xerox copy of the office order dated 14-12-93 of the respondent terminating the services of the petitioner from 17-12-93.
Ex-W3: Xerex copy of the order dates 5-10 of the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing the Ο.Α.Νο. 1632/93 filed by the Chief Personnel Officer . S.C. Railway , as with drawn .
Ex-W4: Xerox copy of the order dated 21-6-96 of the Hon'ble High Court disposing the W.P. No.8412/ 96 filed by the petitioner .
Ex-W5: Xerox copy of the office order dated 6-6-94 of the respondent appointing N. Ravinder as Substitute Banglow Pune w.e.f. 31-5-94 Ex-W6: Xerox copy of the judgement dated 21-2-91 of the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing the O.A.No.814./90 filed by R. Venkatesham.
Documents marked for the Respondent Ex-MI : Authorisation letter dated 2-11-04 given to MWI to give evidence .
Ex-M2: Xerox copy of note dated 7-12-93 of the Secretary to General Manager given to C.P.O recommending per terminating the services of the petitioner .
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1806.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय, पुणे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 411/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-17011/4/1996- आईआर( बी- II ) ]
सी. गंगाधरणं, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st April , 2005 S.O. 1806. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 411/ 1997) of the Labour Court , Pune as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20-04-05.
[No. L - 17011 /4 / 1996 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRIP.E. HAVAL, PRESIDING OFFICER, II LABOUR COURT , PUNE
Reference IDA No. 411of 1997
BETWEEN :
The Senior Manager ,
Life Insurance Corporation of India
Jeevan Prakash , University Road ,
Pune -411005
First Party And
TheGeneral Secretary ,
Poona Division Insurance Workers ' Organisation 185 , Shaniwar Peth , Pune- 411030 . Second Party CORAM : MR . P.E. HAVAL
Appearances : Mr. Pradhan Advocate for first
party (Dictated in open Court (Dt . 10-1-2005) AWARD
This is a reference made by Desk officer , Central Government . u/ s 10 (2A) ( 1 ) (d) of I. D. Act , 1947 for adjudication of industrial dispute between the Senior DivisionManager , Life Insurance Corporation of India (here in after referred to as First Party and General Secretary, Poona Division Insurance Workers ' Organisation (here in after referred to as Second Party) Mention in the schedule , which reads as under :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of LIC of India . Pune in denying the declared enhanced rate of 4979 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
condition under clause 9A of I.D. Act . Second party submits the changes bourght about is patently illegal . At the end second party prayed as under:
interest of 12% on Provident Fund Contribution of Shri S.S. Shirvalkar, who retired on 31-8-93 is legal andjustified ? If not , to what relief the said workmans is entitled? "
2. Second party filed statement of claim in persuance of notice. The case of second party is as under:
(1) First party be directed to make payments of interest portion as P.F. dues at revised rate to the employees retired between 1-4-93 to 17-1-94 and Shri S.S. Shirvalkar in particular , and interest@ 15 % compounding half yearly of the enhanced amount and cost .
3. First party resisted claim of II party by filing written statement . Case of first party is as under:
Second party is trying to extract the money from first party and is trying to harass first party . This Court cannot entertain above reference for the reasons that this Court is empowered to deal the matters which are specified in the second schedule of the I.D. Act 1947. The above matter falls within the perview of III Shcedule of the Act for which Industrial Tribunal is the competent authority under the Act . Therefore, this Court cannot entertain the above reference on this ground only . Therefore, such preliminary issue be framed and decided first . Item 5 of III Schedule gives power to Industrial Tribunal to deal with such matters . Assuming without admitting the Court has powers to entertain the matters regarding provident fund but this Court has no powers to entertain the matters relating to the rate of interest . Therefore this Court cannot entertain this issue in the present reference . The policy decisions are taken at Central Office , Mumbai , the Divisional Office of L.1.C. have to act upon the decisions taken by Central Office. It is necessary to implead Central Office as a necessary party. Second party has not impleaded them as aparty. It is prayed that this Court may be pleased to reject the reference on this ground also . It is true that as stated in para (a) , (b) of statement to claim second party was issued postdated cheque on 19-8-1993 and settle the Provident Fund amount . It is the practice of the first party to settle the dues of the workinen who retires from the services of thefirstparty.
It is true that the rate of interest on provident fund was revised after the retirement of Shri Shirvalkar . However, the contention of second party that the rate of interest on Provident fund was revised with retrospective affect is not true and not admitted . The further contention that the circular was applicable from 1-4-93 is not true and not admitted. Second party is trying to prejudice mind of this Court against first party. It is true that the concerned employee approached to the first party in respect of his demand. However, replies were given from time to time to the second party. The increased rate of interest of 12 % was made applicable to provident fund settlement cases which were made on or after 17-1-1994 i.e. the date of circular and the same is not applicable in the present case. It is pertinent to note that the persons who have obtained the P.F. loan were charged the rate of interest prior to 17-1-94 with low rate . The rate of interest on P.F. loan was increased First party Corporation has their Central Office situated at Yogaksher Mumbai - 1 and has Provident Fund Department in Mumbai which functions under a directions of Provident Fund Trustees-A trust registered under Public Trust Act and meant to serve LIC employées . Second party represented in this dispute through P.D.I.W.O. is registered trade Union. The Sangh did agitate the demand forpayment of interest on fund accure with increased rate of interest to Shri S.S. Shirvalkar, SR No. 413035 of Pune (hereinafter referred to as an employee ) through the Central Government concilliary machinery which ultimately has come for redressal before the Labour Court under Ref. ID No. 411 of 1997. The second party/ employees was working as Higher Grade Assistant in Salary Saving Scheme Department of Pune Divisional Office . He was retired on 31-8-1993 on the post of H.G.A. after office , hours . He completed more than 30 years service . Life Insurance Corporation formulated rules which have been dealt in details elsewhere. The provident fund due were settled on 19-8-93 by issuing post dated cheque of provident fund with interest amount at the rate of 11.90 % . First party, Corporation thereafter declared revised rate of interest on . provident fund with retrospective effect which was higher than that was offered to Shri S.S. Shirvalkar at the time of his payment vide their circular which was applicable from the date 1-4-93 . Though agitating employee retired on a later day was not allowed the benefit of a revised rate . By not granting additional interest amount at enhacned rate of the P.F. corpus has fallen short by that contributing amount from employer. Besides this the employee is even now a pensioner employee and is very much subject for the notice of change as the change has caused adverse impact on employee's benefit and pension corpus both by virtue of the change . Thus the change is unfair and discriminating The aggrieved employee filed a representation approached the LIC of India for reviewing their decision . The P.F. Department after lot of persuation replied vide their letter at 20-5-94 and letterdt . 27-8-94 to Shri S.S. Shirvalkar that though the revised rate of interest was applicable to employees retired before 17-1-94 in general and Mr. Shirvalkar in particular . Meantime the Sangh approaches to Asstt. Labour Commissioner vide letter dt. 4-7-94 and raised the industrial dispute. The management has taken the decision not to reopen the cases of employee who had retired before 17-1-94 is one sided and not in the benefit of the employees . The employee joined services of corporation with a set of service conditions, one of such service condition is the right to referof P.F. contribution with interest and prevailent rate. Since the service condition has been unilateral change and since no notice has been given for such change of service 4980
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
after 17-1-1994 second party has deliberately avoiding this aspect and thus has not come to this Court with clean hands. First party has not made any illegal charge as alleged by II party . There is no discrimination on the part of first party . First party also denied other contents of stateinent of claim and praved to reject the demands of the second party.
4. Considering rival claims of parties , issues are framed as under :
Issues
Findings
No 1. Whether the reference is maintatnable ?
Yes 2. Whether the action of first party in denying the declared enhanced rate of interest of 12% in P.F. Contribution of Shri S. S. Shirvalkar who retired on 31-8-1993 is legal and justified?
No relied 3. If not to what relief second party isentitled ?
4. What award ?
As given below I recorded my findings towards them with reasons to follow:
REASONS
Issues No. 1 :
5. Advocate Pradhan appearing for First Party argued as under:
The reference is not maintainable . Clause 6 of Schedule II of Industrial Disputes Act provides that all matters other than this provided in the third schedule fall under the jurisdiction of the Labour Court . Item 5 of the third schedule mentioned Provident Fund and matters regarding Provident Fund fall within the jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunal and hence , the reference is not maintainable .
6. Shri S.S. Shrivalkar is concerned workınan in the reference who appeared in person but did not argue on the point ofmaintainability ofthe reference . But filed application Exh . 20 stating therein that the reference is maintainable .
7. On going through the second schedule of the industrial Disputes Act , it can be seen that item 6 of Schedule reads as under :
Item 6 : All matters other than this specified in the third schedule .
The second schedule specifies the matters within the jurisdiction of the Labour Court . The relevant section 7( 1 ) of Industrial Disputes Act reads as under :
"The appropriate Government may by notification in the Official Gazette constitute one or more Labour Courts
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter specified in the Second Schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to them under this Act" .
Item 5 of the third schedule reads as under:
"Bonus profit Saving Provident Fund and Gratuity" .
Thethird schedule under Section 7 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act is regarding matters within the jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunals. Section 7 -A of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 reads as under :
" Section 7 - A Tribunals ( 1 ) The appropriate Government may by notification in the Official Gazette constitute one or more Industrial Tribunals for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter, whether specified in the Second Schedule or in the Third Schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to them under this Act" .
Thus , it can be seen from the above mentioned Section 7 , 7 -A and Schedule II and Schedule III of the Industrial Disputes Act that Industrial Tribunals have wider jurisdiction to deal with any item/clauses mentioned in second and especially third schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act , but the Labour Courts have jurisdiction to deal with the matters specified under Clauses p items specified in the second schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is pertinent to note item 5 of third schedule specifies the subject matter Provident Fund and item 6 of second schedule specifies 5 subject matters and all matters other than those specified in third schedule. The subject matter Provident Fund is included in the third schedule . It cannot be stated that Labour Courts have jurisdiction to entertain the subject matter Provident Fund and interest on Provident Fund contribution . In the circumstances , I find that this Labour Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present reference , which includes subject matter of Provident Fund and interest on Provident Fund contribution . I therefore find that present reference is not maintainable . I , therefore , answer the issue accordingly in the negative.
Issue No. 2 :
8. Shri S.S. Shirvalkar appeared in person argued as under:
Shri S.S. Shirvalkar has received interest @ 11.90% p.a. on Provident Fund contribution for the period from 1-10-57 to 31-8-93 towards claimad interest on Provident Fund contribution @ 12 % p.a. for the period from 1-4-93 to 31-8-93 as per Circular dt . 27-1-94 . It is not mentioned in the above mentioned circular that the settled cases will not be re- opened . He has contributed Rs . 25,000 towards Provident Fund contribution as additional contribution on 21-12-92 with a view to claim Income Tax benefits . The balance in the Provident Fund account of Shri S.S. Shirvalkar was Rs. 2,89378 as on 1-4-93 . Therefore, Shri 4981 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
S.S. Shirvalkar claims difference amount to the extent of Rs . 150 due to difference in the rate of interest i . e . 0.10%. Thus, his total claim is Rs . 150 and interest@ 15% p.a. on such balance amount .
above said letter finds place in the proceeding. Such letter dt. 12-4-96 addresed to the Secretary. Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) , Pune states as under:
9. 'Advocate Shri Pradhan appearing for the First Party argued as under :
"Kindly find below the failure ifthe conciliation report induplicate on the above mentioned subject .
There is nopleading in the statement of claim about additional contribution of Rs . 25,000 . The Second Party did not depose before this Court. The Second Party filed no evidence purshis . Circular referred to by the Second Party is not on record . The Circular dt. 17-1-94 states that settled cases shall not be re- opened . This Court cannot decide whether circular is right or wrong because Government has sent the reference . As there is no oral evidence or documentary evidence lead by the Second Party. First Party has no opportunity to meet the same by cross examination of Second Party. In this connection , Advocate Pradhan places reliance on case of Nathuji Narayanrao Udapure v/s. Narendra Vasanjibhal Thakkar and another reported in 1981 Maharashtra Law Journal 446. The relevant index note of the above case reads as under:
"( c) Practice- Non appearance as a witness by a party to proceeding would be strongest possible circumstance discreding the truth of the case pleaded by the said party. It is the bounded duty of a party, personally knowing the whole circumstance ofthe case to give evidence and to submit to cross examination . The non appearance as a witness would be the strongest possible circumstances going to discredit the truth of the case sought to be made out, 29B.L.R. 1392 AIR 1956 Bom. 251 Rel (para 4)" .
The General Secretary , Pune Division, Insurance workers Organisation, Pune in its letter dt . 4-7-94 addressed to ALC ( C) Pune stated that Shri S. S. Shirvalkar has not been paid enhanced rate of interest from 1-4-93 to till his date of retirement . (Kindly see Ann. I ) The said representation was forwarded to LIC for their companies . The management vide its letter dt. 19-9-94 submited that according to Provident Fund Trustees meeting held on 17-10-94 , the trustees haddeclared rate ofinterest @ 12 % for the year 1993-94 . It was also decided that the case of PF settlement where the PF dues have already been paid seed not be reopened . ( Kindly see Annexure II) . Since the workmans case under reference had already settled on 19-8-93 by issuing post dated Cheque they would not be in a position to pay increased rate of interest of 1%. The management further submitted its letter dt . 29-2-96 (Kindly see Annexure III) affiraing their contention that in case of Provident Fund dues already been paid these cases cannot be reopened . As Industrial Disputes found in existence several joint discussion/ concilliation proceedings were held . The union falt that there is nojustification on part of the management not to pay the declared interest of 12% to the settled cases during 1993-94 . As both the parties were sharing divergent views on issues involved in the dispute , the I.D. ended in failure. The Union is willing for arbitration while the management is not willing" .
13. Shri Chandrakant Krishnaraj Bondhe - witness of the First Party affirmed in his examination in chief as under :
10. It can be seen from application Exh . 21 of the Second Party that Second Party did not step into the witness box. On going through the proceedings , it can be seen that the circular referred by the Second Party Shri S.S. Shirvalkar is. not produced on record . Hence , the case in between Nathuji Narayanrao Udapure v/s. Narandra Vasanjibhai Thakkar applicable and it is helpful to the first Party .
11. Advocate Shri Pradhan further argued as under:
The old rate of interest of Provident Fund contribution was 11.5% . The First Party has replied letter ofSecond Party vide replydt . 20-5-94 and the same shows that the said cases shall not be reopened . Copy of such letter dt . 20-5-94 appeared in the proceeding. Above mentioned letter mentions as under :
"Your Provident Fund dues were settled on 19-8-93 by issuing a post dated Cheque . The rate of interest was revised on 17-1-94 w.e.f. 1-4-93 with a provision not to reopen the settled cases . Therefore , we regret that you are not eligible for the difference of interest asper Central Office instructions " .
" Shri . Shirvalkar was in employment of First Party . Shri. Shirvalkar retd . from 31-8-93 . All legal dues including Provident Fund paid to Shirvalkar witness is shown documents letterdt . 15-2-94 produced by Second Party under Exh . 6. After referring witness says that it is zerox copy of letter sent by Shirvalkar to First Party demanding ' If the interest is calculated as the old rate the interest may be calculated at 12% p.a. and send discharge receipt of the difference. Witness is shown documents produced alongwith Exh. 6 Annexure " D " . After referring to it witness says that it is zerox copy of letterdt . 25-5-94 addressed to Shri . Shirvalkar by LIC Ist Party . It is reply to letter sent by Regional Manager to Shri . Shirvalkar . In this letter , it is said that the rate of interest was revised on 17-1-94 w.e.f. 1-4-93 with a provision not to reopen the settled cases and hence Second Party is not eligible for difference in interest .
12. Advocate Pradhan also pointed out letter dt . 12-4-96 from the conclation proceedings . Copy of the 4982
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART I -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1807.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 97/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The rate of interest on Provident Fund amount increased with w.e.f. 1-4-93 vide circular dt . 17-1-94 with a proviso that the settled cases shall not be reopened. In case a loan is taken on Provident Fund amount as based by an employee the interest payable thercon was at the rate of 12% p.a. i.e. 1% p.a. more than the rate of interest payable on Provident Fund amount . The difference in interest demanded by Shri . Shirvalkar was not paid to him because the Central Office of First Party had issued instruction not to reopen already settled cases .
[सं. एल-12012/159/99- आई आर( बी-1 } ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव This witness stated in his cross examination by Shri . S. S. Shirvalkar as under :
New Delhi , the 21st April , 2005 "Although effect is given since 1-4-93 , the difference was not paid because such instructions were issued by Central Office vide the circular and the letter. It is , not true to say that it is the view of First Party that there should be less of employees . I cannot comment on the decision as to why such decision was taken by the Central Office of Ist Party . I do not have information as to whather as employee has taken loan."
S.O. 1807.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 97/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Mysore and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20/04/05.
[No. L- 12012/ 159/99 - IR(B - I) ] C. GANGA DHARAN, Under Secy.. ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE
Dated: 7th April , 2005
PRESENT :
SHRI A. R. SIDDIQUI. Presiding Officer C. R. No. 97/99
I PARTY:
14. It canbe seen that Second Party has not stopped into the witness box in support of his case . The circular relevant as per Second Party is not produced on record . On the contrary, the witness of First Party has stopped into the witness box and stated that although the rate of interest on Provident Fund contribution was increased to 12% w.e.f. 1-4-93 . It is also provided that the settled case shall not be reopened . The letterdt . 12-4-96 mentioned in the foregoing paras also states that the trustees have decided in their meeting that the settled case shall not be reopened . Although the rate of interest on Provident Fund contribution is enhanced to 12 % p.a. , the replydt. 20-5-94 ofFirst Party of the letterdt . 11-5-94 of Shri . S. S. Shirvalkar also mentioned that the settled case shall not be reopened although the rate of interest was revised on 17-1-94 w.e.f. 1-4-93 . In the circumstances . I find that Second Party is not entitled to difference in rate of interest on Provident Fund contributions and action of the First Party is denying the declared enhanced rate of interest@ 12 % on Provident Fund contribution of S. S. Shirvalkar who retired on 31-8-93 is legal and justified . I therefore , answer Issue No. 2 accordingly .
Shri Venkatachala , C/o.Nanjundiah , Madivala St .. Behind Balegarı , St. Fort, HasanDistrict, Holenarasipura - 573211
ISSUE No. 3 :
II PARTY :
15. In view of answer to Issue No. 2, Second Party is not entitled to any other relief. I therefore answer the Issue accordingly and proceed to pass following order: ORDER
1. The reference is hereby rejected.
The Regional Manager . State Bank of Mysore, K. G.Road, Bangalore, Karnataka-8
AWARD
2. No order as to costs . Place : Pune
Date: 10-1-2005
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section 2A of the P. E. HAVAL , Presiding Officer 4983
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
regarding the nature of punishment , such a hearing shall be given .
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred thisdispute vide order No. L - 12012/ 159 / 99 / IR (B - I) dated 4th August, 1999 for adjudication on the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the termination of Shri Venkatachala, Daftry by the management of State Bank of Mysore is justified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
2. The case of the first party workman as made out atparas 1 to 4 of the Claim Statement is as under :-
The first party above named was working as a permanent Daftry / Workman at Konanur Branch of the Second Party . He joined the services of the second Party Bank during the year 1983 as a sub- staff and he had a blemishless record of service . That on 6-3-1992 the first party was kept under suspension on the allegation that there was a shortage of Rs . 20,000 in the cash delivered at the Branch in respect of remittance secured from Hassan Branch of the Bank . It is submitted that as per the procedures in the Bank one Shri Gokuldas Shenoy, Cashier was responsible for the amount and the duty of the first party was only to accompany the said Cashier . That the first party was totally innocent . The Management of the Second Party under duress and assurances of protection obtained certain statements implicating him.
Strangely acting in total contravention of the binding Bipartite Settlement and assurances held out thereby inducing the first party to admit the charge, the Disciplinary Authority by a notice dated 16-2-1993 proposed imposition of penalty of dismissal from service . A reply to the said notice was also obtained by the Disciplinary Authority assuring that it would be treated as a case under paragraph 19.12 (e) . However , totally going back on paragraph 19.12 ( e ) and the assurances and inducements on the basis of which certain statements were obtained from the first party , the Disciplinary by an order dated 29th April , 1993 imposed the penalty of dismissal from service on the first party. Appeal filed on 17-5-1993 against the said order of penalty was dismissed by order dated 12-8-1993 . In the appeal it was pointed out that the so called admission of the first party was subject to the condition that the case should be treated as one under paragraph 19.12(e) . It was further submitted that there has been no application of mind on the part ofthe Disciplinary Authority. It was also pointed out that there cannot be any allegation of removal of cash against the first party having regard to the. fact that trunk in which the cash was placed was locked and the key of the same was always with the cashier. He also submitted that the Disciplinary Authority has not examined facts and circumstances of the matter and at best what could be charged against the first party was non - malafide negligence . The first party prayed for reinstatement . The Appellate Authority on 12-8-1993 rejected this appeal . Thereafter the first party made a representation dated 18-11-1996 to the Second Party , which is yet to be replied. The Trade Union ofwhich the first party was a member has now advised that there is no hope of my settlement except with the intervention of the Hon'ble authorities under the Industial Disputes Act . That the entire proceedings taken against the first party are void ab initio . The penalty that is imposed on the first party is excessive and is in the nature of victimization . No enquiry has been held. Under the Bipartite Settlement enquiry need not be held only in cases where no capital punishment is being imposed . The Second Party ought to have treated the case as one under ' paragraph 19.12 ( e) and the penalty imposed apart from being most inhuman , unjust and unfair is also illegal and contrary to the binding provisions of the Bipartite Settlement . By the aforesaid order of penalty the livelihood of the first party has been taken away and he is driven to economic distress
and starvation .
By an order dated 17-3-1992 the first party was placed under suspension . Thereafter a charge sheet was issued on 8-6-92 . The notice of enquiry issued by the Disciplinary Authority deliberately withheld vital information to the first party on his defense entitlement. Finally the enquiry was held between November, 1992 and 1993. In the enquiry, the First Party was made to accept the charge by foul means . On the basis of such brought up admission, without holding any enquiry and without examining any witness or evidence , the Enquiry Officer gave a report dated 16-1-1993 holding the first party guilty . The assurances that were given to the First Party and the procedure followed by the Second Party were to treat the entire case under paragraph 19.12 (e) of the Industrial Bipartite Settlement . Under the said clause an enquiry need not be held if (i ) the misconduct is such that even if proved the Bank does not intend to award the punishment of discharge or dismissal ; and ( ii ) the bank has issued a show cause notice to the employee advising him of the misconduct and the punishment for which he may be liable for such misconduct: and ( iii) the employee makes a voluntary admission of his guilt in his reply to the aforesaid show cause notice . The clause also stipulates that if the employee concerned requests a hearing 4984
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
3. Right from the above the first party requested thisTribunal to reinstate him in service with continuity of service , back wages and other service benefits.
recorded the finding on the above said issue to the effect that the Doinestic Enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper. Therefore , after hearing the learned counsels for the parties on the perversity of the findings and quantum of punishment award is being passed .
4. The management by its Counter Statement among other grounds contended that keeping the first party workman under Suspension a charge sheet dated 8-6-92 was issued and Domestic Enquiry being participated by the first party with the assistance of his Co - worker was conducted. He admitted the charges during the couse of enquiry held on 6-1-93 orally as well as by submitting a letter dated 6-1-93 . Therefore , the enquiry officer after considering the material on record submitted findings holding the first party guilty of the charges and the Disciplinary Authority by its order dated 16-2-93 proposed punishment of dismissal against the first party on which he was personally heard on 7-4-93 in the presence of his defence representatives once against admitting the guilt and pleading for mercy. However, the Disciplinary Authority keeping in view gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party dismissed him from service by order dated 29-4-93 . His appeal against the order of dismissal was also rejected upholding the dismissal order passed by the Disciplinary Authority . The management denied the allegations made by the first party that he was made to admit the charges of misconduct on the assurances given by the management that a lenient view to be taken against him and that the admission of the guilt by the first party was conditional on the assurances given to him that he will be dealt with under the Clause 19.12 ( e) instead of Clause 19.15 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement for which charge sheet was issued to hiin . The management also denied the allegations that the plea taken by the first party that he was assured by the management to be dealt with under clause 19.12 ( e ) of the Bipartite Settlement was an after thought plea just to cover up the charges of misconduct leveled against him . The management also contended that as on the date dispute was raised by the first party in the year 1999 no dispute as such was existing being delayed for a period of about 6 years from the date of dismissal of the first party in as much as dispute before the labour department itself was raised by the first party after the gap of 3 years from the date of his dismissal from service . Therefore , the management requested this tribunal to reject the reference.
5. Keeping in view the pleadings of the parties on the point of fairness and validity of the enquiry proceedings , my learned predecessor took up the above said question as Preliminary Issue and parties were called upon to adduce evidence on the said question. During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined one witness as MW 1 and got marked 7 documents at Ex . M1 to M7. First party examined himself as WW1 without getting marked any documents.
6. After hearing the learned counsels for the respective parties , this tribunal by its order dated 15-9-04
7. Learned counsel for the first party Shri NSN vehemently argued that the case on hand first of all is a case of shortage of suin of Rs . 20,000/ - and even if it is taken for granted that it was a case of misappropriation , it was a temporary misappropriation not warranting the extreme punishment of dismissal . He contended that first of all the charge of misconduct of shortage of the funds was not called for against the first party who was just working as a Daftry ( sub staff) not in the custody of the funds belonging to the management bank and secondly the plea of the guilt alleged to have been made by the first party during the course of enquiry was at the result of the assurances and inducement made on the part of the management that he will be dealt with clause 19.12 ( e) of Bipartite Settlement though charge sheet was issued against him under Clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement . Therefore, the first party being an illiterate and poor person under the fears of loosing the job oblivious of the consequences of the plea of the guilt made by him with all his innocence pleaded guilty to the charges and the management without considering all the aspects of case imposed the punishment of dismissal against the first party who infact was made scapegoat into the whole episode of the shortage of Rs . 20,000/- into the accounts of the bank. Therefore , learned counsel submitted that keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case , the findings of the Enquiry Officer suffered from perversity and the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate and not commensurate to the gravity of the alleged misconduct committed by the first party . Whereas , learned counsel for the management argued that the first party pleaded guilty to the charges of misconduct being very much aware ofthe consequences to be followed. He pleaded guilty to the charges taking his own time as the enquiry held against him spread over 4 sittirigs commencing from 25-11-1992 to 6-1-93 . Therefore , it cannot be said that he admitted the guilt on the assurances or the inducement made on the part of the management particularly , when his Defence Representative was also present when the first party pleaded guiltyto the charges during the course of enquiry on6-1-93 not only by making oral submission but also by submitting his letter dated 6-1-93 marked as Ex.M5 before this tribunal . He submitted that when the charges of misconduct were admitted by the first party throughout the enquiry proceedings , there was nothing wrong on the part ofthe enquiry officer to hold him guilty of the charges submitting his findings despite the fact that there was no oral and documentary evidence adduced by the management to prove the said charges . He submitted that charges of misconduct being very grave in nature , the 4985 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारतका राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
"Charge Sheet : In the matter of shortage of Rs. 20,000/- at the branch in the Inward Remittance on 6th March , 1992 .
management was justified in imposing the punishment of dismissal and the Appellate Authority also committed no wrong in rejecting the appeal preferred by the first party challenging the dismissal order . He submitted that the plea of the guilt by the first party was not conditional . His request to deal him with the clause 19.12( e) cannot be said to be a condition precedent to accept his plea of guilt in as much as he could not have imposed any such condition after having pleaded guilty of the charges .
It has been brought out in the enquiry by the branch into the affairs of shortage of Rs . 20,000 (Rupees Twenty Thousands only ) on 6th March , 1992 that the loss was distinctly pointed towards you and it was finally made good by you duly brought from your house.
Your involvement in the above act in surreptiously removing Rs . 20,000 ( Rupees Twenty Thousand only) from the Bank Remittance and keeping it in your house , amounts to acts prejudicial to the interest of the Bank, which was likely to involve the Bank in serious loss .
Your above misconduct if proved tantamount to GrossMisconduct in terms of Para 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement .
You are advised to submit your explanation as to why disciplinary action as above should not be initiated against you for the said alleged misconduct. Your reply should reach us within 15 days from the date of receipt of this letter. You may acknowledge receipt of this letter on the duplicate. " 8. After having gone through the records , I find much substance in the arguments advanced by the first party as far as the proof of charges of misconduct levelled against the first party . The proceedings of enquiry marked before this tribunal at Ex.M6 would read to the effect that on the first date of sitting taken place on 25-11-92 , the first party was present before the Enquiry Officer and he sought for adjournments on the gound that his Defence Representative was not available . Thereafter , as could be seen from the records the enquiry came to be adjourned twice on 10-12-92 and 30-12-92 on the ground that the first party was not keeping well . The proceedings of the enquiry further disclose that on 6-1-93 when the enquiry was taken up . procedure of enquiry was explained to the first party and when he understood the same , the charges of misconduct were read out to him and to that first party pleaded guilty to charges orally and also submitted his letter at Ex. M5 admitting the guilt whereunder he made a request to be dealth with under Clause 19.12 ( e ) of the Biparte Settlement . Therefore , in the light of the plea of the guilt made by the first party and the letter submitted by him to the above effect, the enquiry officer closed the enquiry proceedings on the request made by the Presenting Officer representing the management and thereupon submitted his findings holding the first party workman guilty of the charges of misconduct levelled against him . In the result as argued for the management no fault can be had with the procedure of enquiry adopted by the enquiry officer and the findings submitted by him holding the first party guilty of the charges on the basis of plea of guilt made by the first party . It is now well settled principle of law that in case the delinquent admitted the charges of misconduct at the commencement of the enquiry , there needed no further proceedings to be conducted recording the evidence of the management on the proof of the charges of misconduct . Therefore , contention of the first party that findings of the enquiry suffered from any perversity holds no water . In the result it is to be held that charges of misconduct have been proved against the first party.
9. Now coming to the question of quantum of punishment . let me first bring on record the very charge sheet issued to the first party by the management as under:-
10. From the wordings of the above charge sheet , therefore , it gets clear that there was no charge specifically made against the first party of misapporpriation of the funds belonging to the bank . Such a charge also could not have been made against him, he being a sub staff working just as a Daftry , not the custodian of the funds of the bank in any capacity . There also could not have been allegation of cash shortage as in that case again the first party must have been dealing with the cash of the bank either as a Clerk , Cashier or in any other capacity of the officer dealing with the cash. Therefore , the arguments for the first party that it is a case of misapporpriation of the funds temporarily cannot be brushed aside lightly particularly in view of wordings of para 1 of the said Charge Sheet . Moreover , it is not disclosed as to when actually the above said shortage took place . It is said that it was on 6-3-1992 the loss was distinctly pointed towards the first party , and he made good of the said shortage finally. Therefore , there is no date given in the Charge Sheet when the shortage took place nor it is disclosed as to on what date actually the shortage was made good by the first party . Therefore , on the basis of the wordings used in the charge sheet at the most we can presume that on the very date when shortage was detected , the first party made good of the shortage and if we proceed on the said assumption , then the arguments for the first party that it was at the most the case of temporary misappropriation of the funds has to be attached due weight . Learned counsel for the 1358 GI /2005-30 4986
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
management cited number of decisions as under :-
(1) 2001 AIR SCW 2330
(2) 1995 ( 1 ) LLJ Kar (DB ) 1995 ( 1 ) LLJ 233 ( SB ) (3 ) AIR 1998 SC2311-1998 LAB IC2514-AIR 1998(4) SSC 310
(4)AIR 1997 SC 2661
(5) 1999 (II) LLJ 155.
11. On the point that when the misconduct is proved the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority cannot be interfered with at the hands of this tribuna:. i do agree with the principle laid down in the aforesaid rulings laying down the above said proposition of law. However, in the instant case we must take into consideration the various factors , status of the workman , the circumstances under which he is said to have pleaded guilty to the charges.
12. As noted above , the case on hand at the most is a case of temporały misappropriation of the funds . The first party was not the official or the officer working in the bank holding a position of dealing with the cash in any manner, he being just a sub staff working as Daftry . One also cannot just ignore the wordings of the letter dated 6-1-93 said to have been submitted by the first party , according to the management , pleading guilty to the charges of misconduct . His letter reads as under:-
"With reference to the above , I humbly submu before you're the following :-
Due to many domestic problems and continuous tragedies occurred in my family , I was totally shattered by my mental peace . Even today , sir , I am aghast as to how I have committed such a heinous act which I am very much shameful . This act of my misconduct happened without my knowledge . when all the staff members of Konanur branch including the manager gave me solace and soothe my depressed feelings , I confessed honestly before them and repaid the money intact. Therefore , I humbly pray you sir , to have mercy on me and instead of Para 19.5 (j ) of the bipartite settlement , kindly proceed against me under Para 19.12( e) ofthe bipartite settlement .
I assure you sir, in future I discharge my duties to the best satisfaction of the superiors . "
13. Therefore , from the above said letter it is very difficult to jump to the conclusion that the act committed by the first party in removing the aforesaid money from the bank was an act committed by him deliberately knowing fully the consequences and that he could not reconcile with the situation even as on the date he
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] tendered such a letter . Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances brought out in my aforesaid discussion , the status of the first party , not ignoring the fact that it was the misconduct committed by the first party for the first time and that the misconduct on hand at the most amounts to temporary misappropriation of the funds and the circuinstances in which he pleaded guilty to the charges of misconduct and the fact that charges of misconduct in fact were not established by .he management by leading oral or documentary evidence . It appears to me that ends of justice will be met if the first party is dealt with lesser punishment of withholding of his 4 consecutive increments for a period of 4 years with cumulative effect without back wages and without continuity of the services from the date of his dismissal till the date of his reinstatement by replacing them with the punishment of dismissal . Accordingly the reference is answered and following award is passed .
AWARD
The manageinent is directed to reinstate the first party workman to the post he held at the time of dismissal without back wages and continuity of service . His four consecutive annual increments are ordered to be withheld with cumulative effect . No order to cost .
(Dictated to PA transcribred by her corrected and signedby me on 7th April , 2005 )
A.R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1808.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम -न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 268/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/207/96- आई.आर. ( बी- I ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st April , 2005
S.O. 1808. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 268/ 97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of State Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20-04-2005.
[No. L- 12012/207 /96 - IR(B -I) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24 , 1927
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE
Dated: 11th April , 2005
PRESENT :
SHRI A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer
C.R. No. 268/97
IParty:
IParty :
Shri G. Vijaya Kumar ,
The Regional Manager, No. 1100,
StateBank of India, St. Mark's Road, Bangalore - 560001 Parandanahalli Road, Swarnakuppam Extension
Robertsonpet K.G.F.
AWARD
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 12012/207/96/ IR(B - I) dat3d 12-9-97 for adjudication on the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the management of State Bank of India is justified in dismissing Shri G. Vijayakumar from services on grounds of misappropriation ? If not , to whatrelief the workman is entitled. "
2. The first party workman in his Claim Statement challenged the enquiry proceedings at Paras 2 to 9 and findings of the Enquiry Officer as well as impugned punishment order at Paras 10 to 13 ( as this court has already recorded the finding holding that enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper , pleadings on the point are omitted) . The case of the first party as made out in the Claim Statement at paras 10 to 13 are as under :-
That after the proceedings were over , the enquiry officer gave his findings which are totally perverse and there was no discussion of evidence put forth by the first party workman . All that he did was adopted the evidence given by the management and discarried the evidence given by hte first party workman , and hence the finding given by the enquiry officer cannot be relied upon .
That the Disciplinary Authority did not act in a fair manner . There was no application of mind by him and he did not consider the past record of service while imposing punishment and also the punishment given to the first party workman is totally disproportionate to the alleged misconduct . Hence
49 theorder ofdisciplinary authority by imposing the punishment of dismissal cannot be sustained.
That the first is unemployed, he has a large family to maintain, he is finding it extremely difficult to maintainhimself and the members of his family.
That after the dismissal from service he raised an Industrial Dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) because of the adament view taken by the management Conciliation ended in fallure thereafter the dispute is referred to this Hon'ble Court .
3. The management by its Counter Statement while denying the allegations of the first party on the point of fairness and validity or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings of paras 1 to 5 , on merits of the case took up the contentions at Paras 6 & 7 as under :-
The Enquiry Officer submitted his detailed report on 9-1-1995 and on the basis of the material produced , held that the first party workman was guilty of the charges levelled against him . The report was forwarded to the disciplinary authority . The first party was given an opportunity to personal hearing before the Disciplinary Authority . The first party was heard on 5-9-95 . Subsequently , the Disciplinary Authority imposed the punishment of dismissal from Bank's Service . The first party preferred an appeal to the appellate authority on 7-10-95 , which confirmed the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority by his order dated 16-1- 96. The charge proved against the first party workman was grave and serious in nature and the punishment meted out him is appropriate. Keeping in view the nature of the second party's business and sensitivity of the services being rendered by the Bank and the duties cast on the firstparty workman , punishment given to him was appropriate as the industry basically runs on trust and they could not afford to continue the services of the first party workman .
4. Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties on the point of fairness and validity or otherwise ofthe enquiry proceedings , this court took up the said question as a Preliminary Issue calling upon the parties to adduce their evidence . The management examined one witness as MW1 and got marked whole of the enquiry proceedings papers at Ex . MI including the charge sheet which was earlier marked as Ex. M1 . Whereas , the workman examined himself as WW1 without getting marked any document . After hearing the learned counsels for the respective parties , this tribunal by its order dated 21-6-04 recorded a finding to the effect that enquiry conducted against the first party 4988
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
3. 2000 LLJ II Page 1395-1398
4. AIR 1998 SC page 2311
is fair and proper . Thereupon case came to be posted to hear the learned counsels on merits i.e. on the point of perversity of the findings as well as quantum of punishment awarded against the first party .
5. Learned, counselfor thefirst party vehemently argued that the charge of misconduct made against the first party is with respect to misappropriation of funds of Rs . 200/- said to have been received by him from the customer on 13-7-1991 but not accounted for in the relief registers maintained by the bank by the first party who worked as Incharge Cashier as well as Teller on the above said date . He submitted that the enquiry officer , has relied upon the copy of the Counter foil marked as Ex . Pl during the enquiry said to have been found on the person of the first party seized by the police when he met with the accident after about 3 months on the alleged date of misappropriation . Learned counsel submitted that the condition of the Counterfoil copy of the Ex . P I produced before this tribunal would falsify the case of the management that it was found on the person of first party in a condition now produced after the gap of three months from the date of misappropriation . Therefore , learned counsel submitted that the reliance made by the Enquiry Officer on Ex . Pl and the evidence of PWI on the said point has resulted into miscarriage ofjustice and it is therefore , the findings of the Enquiry Officer holding the workman guilty of the charges on the basis of the said document as well as other evidence suffered from perversity to be set aside by this tribunal . Learned counsel submitted thatkeeping in view the alleged amount of Rs . 200/- misappropriated by the first party and his past clean record of service for about a period of 12 years , punishment of dismissal was not proportionate to the gravity of the charges of misconduct and therefore , is liable to be set aside . He also submitted that lenient view may be taken against the first party reinstating him in service even without backwages . Keeping in view his suffering and hardship as well as his family members hardship caused due to unemployment of the first party from the date he was dismissed from service .
6. Whereas , learned counsel for the management filed its Wren Arguments and submitted that punishment of dismis: awarded against the first party was quitė proportionate and incommensurate to the gravity of the misconduct committed by him and therefore, has to be up held by this tribunal . In support of his case that when charge of misconduct has been proved , punishment imposed by the management particularly in the case of misappropriation of the funds belonging to the management is quite commensurate and proportionate not to be interferred at the hands of this tribunal , relied upon the following citations:-
1. 1987 Lab IC Page 77-89
7. After having gone through the records , I do not find substance in the arguments advanced for the first party that enquiry findings suffered from any perversity . Firstof all it is interesting to note that the first party in his Claim Statement, throughout , never challenged the enquiry findings setting out any reason . The only stray sentence he used at para 10 of the Claim Statement was that the Enquiry Officer gave his findings which are totally perverse as there was no discussion of evidence put forth by the first party workman . Except the above said solitary sentence , absolutely , no grounds or reasons were made out as to how the enquiry findings suffered from perversity . During the course of his argument, learned counsel also uid not make any elaborate comments on the perversity of the findings of the Enquiry Officer with reference to the evidence adduced by the management to prove the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party. His only contention was that the document at Ex . Pl marked during the course of enquiry was not a piece of evidence to be acted upon by the Enquiry Officer as the condition of the said document itself could speak to the fact that it was not found on the person of the first party to be seized by the police when he met with Motor Accident. His point was that when the said document was to be found on the person of first party after a gap of 3 months from the date of alleged misappropriation of Rs. 200 done by him , then , it would not have been in a condition produced before the Enquiry Officer , Xerox copyofwhich is produced before this tribunal. On a perusal ofEx. P1 , I find substance in his argument . Looking to its condition, it would not have been in this condition if found on the person of the first party after a gap of about 3 months period from the date it came into existence . However , this was not the only piece of evidence pressed into service by the management to prove the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party . A careful scrutiny of the findings of enquiry rendered by the Enquiry Officer would make it abundantly clear that apart from Ex . P1 other relevant documents at Ex . Pl to Ex . P 12 were marked and two important witnesses namely , PW1 , the then Manager of the branch concerned and PW2 the Customer, Smt . Girija Somnath were examined for the management to prove the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party . The Enquiry Officer in detail has discussed the above said oral testimony of PW2 and the documents at Ex. P1 to P12 at paras 33 to Paras 44 and at 44 (1) to 44.29. From the observations/reasonings assigned by the Enquiry Officer in holding the workman guilty of the charges, by no stretch of imagination it can be said that his findings suffered from perversity. He discussed in length the oral testimony of PW1 & PW2 witnesses and documents brought on record rightly came to the conclusion that a sum of Rs . 200 which was deposited by 2. 1999 II LLJ Page 155-159 4989
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
punishment of dismissal is converted into order of termination ofhis services enabling him to receive service benefits from the management . Accordingly the reference isanswered. Hence the following award is passed.
AWARD
The order of punishment of dismissal is replaced with the order of termination of the services of the first party. He is entitled to further service benefits for the period of service, he has rendered with the management . No order to cost .
(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signedby me on 11th April 2005) . A.R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल, 2005. का.आ. 1809.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 60/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -17012/57/97- आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st April , 2005
S.O. 1809.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 60/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20-04-2005 .
said Smt . Girija Somnath with the management bank through first party who was working as Incharge Cashier and Teller on 1-7-91 , did not get into accounts of the management bank as the above said deposited amount did not figure into various relevant registers maintained by the bank as on the above said date. In fact the first party has never disputed the fact of depositing of Rs . 200 by the said lady on her hand and the fact that he issued deposits slips/ counter foil accordingly in her favour duly signed by him . It is never his case that he did not receive the said sum of Rs . 200/ - from the said lady as an Incharge Cashier and Teller as on 1-7-91 so as to be accounted for in the account book maintained by the Bank. The only defence which he took up before the Enquiry Officer and discussed by him in his enquiry findings at para 44.29 was the possibility of over payment of Rs . 200/- made by him to some other customer on that date . This aspect of the case has been very much considered by the Enquiry Officer and he has given sufficient reasons , In rejecting his defence . Therefore , even for a moment we discard the above said Counter foil at Ex P1 said to have beenfound on the person of the first party as not deserving due credence , the rest of the voluminous documentary evidence and the oral evidence produced by the management to prove the charges of misconduct against the first party can never be said to be evidence " insufficient" or not satisfactory to prove the charges of misconduct against the first party. In fact as noted above , learned counsel for the first party never dwelt upon any comments over the oral testimony of PW2 and the documentary evidence produced by the management supporting the charges of misconduct committed by the first party. Perhaps , for the reason that the evidence pressed into service by the management on the point was more than sufficient , legal and satisfactory to substantiate the charges levelled against the first party . Therefore , charges have been established and proved by the management by sufficient and legal evidence and hence , the arguments advanced by the first party that findigns of enquiry officer suffered from perversity deserve no merits.
[No. L - 17012/57/97 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , BANGALORE
Dated: 12th April, 2005
PRESENT :
IParty:
Shri A.R. Siddiqui, Presiding Officer C.R, No. 60/98 IIParty: LIC of India,
Mr. Venkatesh S. Sirsikar, The Divisional Manager , NehruNagar,
8. Coming to the question of quantum of punishment , it is now well settled principle of law that when once a charge of misconduct , particularly , of the misappropriation of the funds belonging to the management stands proved during the course of Domestic Enquiry held by the management against the delinquent concerned which Domestic Enquiry in turn is held to be fair and proper by the Trial Court , there can be no scope left for this tribunal to interfere with the punishment imposed by the management having regard to the gravity ofthe misconduct committed by the workınan concerned . However, keeping in view the fact that the first party has rendered service of about 10 to 11 years with the management having no bad spot in his service record, it appears to ine that ends ofjustice will be met if the order of 4990
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
Near Karegundi , Sirsi , North Kanara
Divisional Office, Jeevan Prakash , CollegeRoad, Dharwad - 580001
AWARD
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L - 17012/57/ 97 /IR ( B - II ) dated 29-6-98 for adjudication on the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India in terminating the services of Shri Sirsikar w.e.f. 18-1-97 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief said workman is entitled ?"
2. The case of the first party workman, as made out in the Claim Statement , to put in nut - shell is that he is aged about 28 years , Arts graduate and a SC candidate. His name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange , Karwar in his letter dated 18-10-1994 and was appointed as Temporary Assistant after an interview by the Management , Life Insurance Corporation of India , Dharwad Division , as per the letter dated 22-9-95 and was posted to work at Sirsi Branch of the Corporation ; that he joined his duty at the branch office at Sirsi on 22-9-95 and was working very sincerely and continuously beyond the period of 120 days despite the period of 120 days mentioned in his appointment letter . Therefore , he completed continuous service of more than 1 year and 4 months but to his shock and surprise he was relieved from his services vide letter dated 18-1-97 . His representation dated 13-4-97 to the Sr. Divisonal Manager however , fell on deaf ears . Therefore , he moved the Conciliation Officer but because ofthe adament attitude of the management conciliation ended in failure resulting into the present reference . He further contended that the action of the management in terminating his services amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2 (00) read with Section 25F of the ID Act and so also amounts to unfair labour practice under Section 2 ( ra ) read with 5th Schedule of the ID Act. He requested this tribunal to set aside his termination order with a direction to the management to reinstate him in service with back wages and all other consequential benefits .
3. The management by its Counter Statement while not disputing the fact that the first party workınaıı was appointed as Assistant on Temporary basis vide appontment letter dated 22-9-1995 and worked in the said capacity at the aforesaid branch for a period of more than one year and 3 months however , contended that the appointment of the first party was in the nature of a Contract
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] ofTemporary appointment in terms and conditions of the above said appointment letter and he joined duty on 22-9-95 in terms of the said appointment letter . Management contended that the terms and conditions of the appointment letter would make it abundantly clear that the appointment of the first party was on temporary basis fora specified period of 120 days subject to the conditon that his services will be terminated as soon as a regular candidate was posted to his post . Therefore, the first party cannot claim any right of employment or absortion ofhis services on the ground that his termination amounts to retrenchment and therefore , is illegal termination , giving rise to the dispute on hand .
4. The first party workman as well as the management have reproduced the terms and conditions of appointment letter in their claim statement as well as in their Counter Statement respectively and to appreciate the respective contentions , it is brought on record as under:-
" 1. You are hereby offered at Sirsi Branch office of the Corporation in the temporary vacancy that has arisen on account of ragular vacancy (here indicate how the vacancy arisen ) on wages of Rs . 1000 / - per month from 22-9-1995 to 19-1-1996 for a period of 120 days from the date ofjoining the service, which ever is least . Theperiod of employment is limited to the period of pending employment of a Candidate on a regular basis .
2. Your appointment on temporary basis as of one said, shall be governed by the provisions of the LIC of India (Einployment of Temporary Staff) Instructions 1993 .
3. During the period of employment with the Corporation none of the provisions of the LIC of India (Staff) Regulation 1960 barring regulation 8 of the rules issued by the Central Government u/s 48 of LIC Act 1956 , shall apply to you ; and you shall have to obey orders and instructions as may by given to you from time to tiine both orallyand inwriting by the person or authority at whose disposal your services are for the time beingplaced.
4.Over and above the wages specified in Para No. 1 above, you shall also be entitled to the benfit of leave as specified below :-
(a) Casual leave for temporary appointment is at the rate of 1.1 /4 for a period of 30 days and shall be granted only for half of full working day.
(b) Privilege leave , at the rate of one day for every 11 days actually worked by you , and to privilege leave earned by you during the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
period of temporary employment shall be availed during the period of temporary employment itself as it shall lapse on the expiry ofsuch employment.
5. You shall not be entitled to any other benefit for on account of this employment on temporary basis and shall not be entitled to any preference for recruitment to any post or claim absorption, regularization in the service of the corporation .
6. Your appointment is on temporary basis and it shall come to an end on the expiry of the period mentioned in Para No. 1 above or at any time prior thereto , if it becomes necessary , to terminate such appointment without assigning any cause therefore,
7. If the terms and conditions mentioned herein above are acceptable to you, you are requested to report for duties at the office of the Corporation, stated in Para No. 1 immediately. " 5. During the course of trial , the management examined one witness as MW1 and got marked above said appointment letter at Ex.M1 , transfer order of the officials of the Corporation at Ex.M2 and the Relieving Order atEx.M3 . First party examined himself as WW1 and got marked six documents at Ex . W1 to W6 to the cross examination of MW1 . Ex. W1 is the letter given by the Second Party to the first party to raport for duty . Ex .W2 is the appointment order in printed format , Ex. W3 is the Relieving Order of the first party , Ex. W4 is the conduct certificate issued to the first party and Ex.W5 & W6 are his representations.
6. I would like to refer to the depositions of MW1 and WWI made before this tribunal as and when found relevant and necessary.
7. Learned counsel for the first party , vehemently , argued that the first party in fact was appointed on permanent basis and that the insertion in handwriting at Ex.M1 (a) made on Ex.M1 was made subsequently to show that his appointment was subject to the posting of regular candidate . He submitted that when admittedly first party worked for a period of about 15 months continuously, the period of 120 days prescribed under the appointment order has become redundant and irrelevant and therefore, it cannotbe said that it was a case of contractual employment and that, on the expiry of the said period services of the first party were liable to be terminated . His contention was termination on hand amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2 (00) of the ID Act and since provisions of 25F are not complied with , it amounts to illegal termination liable to be set aside by this tribunal .
8. Whereas, the learned counsel for the management submitted his written notes of arguments spreading over
4991 14 pages once again reiterating the various contentions taken by the management in the Counter Statement and also citing various decisions on the point that first party was appointed on temporary basis , that too , for a specified period of 120 days and therefore , after expiry of 120 days at any time his services were liable to be terminated subject to the condition of filling up of the said post by way of regular candidate . He once again invited the attention of this tribunal to the various conditions of the appointment order to support to his arguments . He contended that his services came to an end when the above said post held bythe first party came to be filed by an order of transfer of 17 officials of the Corporation including the one posted to the post held by first Party. Learned counsel also submitted that first of all in the light of Section 48(2c) of LIC of IndiaAct relating to terms and conditions of service of the employees appointed by the Corporation, termination cannot be questioned keeping in view Regulation 8 of LIC of India (Staff) Regulaion 1960 later on amendedby the Act , 1981. Therefore , he submitted since the appointment of the first party is under rules framed by the LIC of India authorized by the Central Government of India, provisions of ID Act will not attract even otherwise the case on hand according to him falls under Section 2(oo) (bb) of the ID Act , it being a case of Contractual Employment.
9. On going through the records and the principle laid down in their Lordship , Supreme Court of India , Hon'ble High Court and decisions of other High Courts cited onbehalfof the management , I do not find substance in the arguments advanced for the first party .
10. As seen above , the letter of appointment under which the firstpartyjoined the services of the corporation isvery important to appreciate the respective contentions of the parties. As per Conditions No. 1 his appointment was made on the monthly wages of Rs . 1000/ - specifying the tenure of service of 120 days from the date ofjoining of the service pending employment of a candidate on a regular basis . As per Condition No.2 his appointment was governed by the provisions of LIC of India (Employment ofTemporary Staff) Instructions 1993. As per term No 3 it was made clear that none of the members of LIC of India (Staff) Regulation 1960 barring Regulation 8 of the Rules to be issued by the Central Government under Section 48 of the LIC Act , 1956 shall apply to him . As per Condition No.6 his appointment was on temporary basis to come to an end on the expiry of the period prescribed at Condition No. 1 or at any time prior thereto , if it becomes necessary without assigning any cause . As per Condition No.7 it was made clear to the first party to join duty if he is agreeable to all the conditions mentioned in the appointment letter.
11. Both the parties as seen above, have reproduced the terms and conditions of the appointment letter in their 4992
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] pleadings and have also produced copies of the appointment letter in support of their respective claims.
said case cannot make any grievance if his services are to be terminated . If permanent employee was appointed against a regular vacancy . Their Lordship of Supreme Court in adecision reported in AIR 2002 SC 2495 have laid down the principle that disengagement/ termination of service of a Watcinnan after purpose and period , of engagement was over, does not amount to retrenchment . Their Lordship of High Court of Madras in a decision reported in 1993 1 LLJ page 1030 have laid down the proposition of law to the effect that persons appointed on temporary basis under Regulation 8 of the LIC of India ( Staff) Regulation 1960 ( now amended Act 1981 ) cannot challenge their termination order on the ground of retrenchment .
12. In the instant case also the appointment letter issued to the first party was governed under the aforesaid regulations arid his appointment was on temporary basis fora period of 120 days subject to the condition of filling up the said post by virtue of availability of regular candidate .
13. As noted above , services of the first party in this case were terminated when a regular candidate by way of transfer was posted to his place . It was well argued for the management that even if the case on hand is considered under the provisions of ID Act , the first party cannot succeed for the reason that his appointment order comes under the provisions of Section 2 (00 ) (bb) of the ID Act, it being a Contractual Employment . Therefore , keeping in view the admitted position of fact and law brought out above, it cannot be said that management cannot justify its action in terminating the services of the first party, he being a temporary employee taken on duty for a specific period of 120 days subject to availability of a regular candidate to be posted to his place . In the result the first party must fail and accordingly reference is answered by passing the following Award .
AWARD
The reference is dismissed . No order to cost .
(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 12th April , 2005.)
{
A.R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1810.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कॉरपोरेशन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 974/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/106/94- आई.आर. ( बी. 11 ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर संचिव Therefore , facts very much admitted in this case are as per Ex.M1 that first party was appointed on temporary basis/ contractual basis for a specific period of 120 days , his services being liable to be terminated even before the expiry of the above said period and on posting of regular candidate to the post held by the first party . He was to be governed under the provisions of above said Staff Regulation and LIC Act . Therefore , the only question now to be considered would be " as to whether the order terminating the services of the first party would amount to retrenchment since he worked for a period of more than 15 months i . e. to say for a period of 240 days or more to be governed under the provisions of the ID Act " . The answer will be in the negative for more than one reason . First of all the arguments advanced for the first party that the insertion at Ex.M1 ( a) in Ex.M1 was not there originally in his appointment letter at Ex. W2 , cannot be accepted as no such case was made out by the first party in his Claim Statement itself. It appears to be an afterthought and improved version of first party in his deposition . A perusal ofEx.M1 (a) for that matter Ex .W2 (a) in Ex .W2 putting the condition that period of employment is limited to the period of pending employment of a candidate on his regular posts cannot be said to be a subsequent insertion as this clause is found in the letter of appointment issued to the first party and copy of the appointment order produced by the management before this tribunal . Moreover, the handwriting of this clause is one and the same of the handwriting in filling up certain gaps of the appointment letter issued to the first party . therefore , when we proceed on the assumption that the period specified in the appointment letter for which the first party was appointed was 120 days from the date of joining service then , it cannot be disputed that it was a case of contractual employment . It is not in dispute that the first party relieved from his services after the regular candidate by way of transfer was posted to liis place . The documents at Ex . MI to M3 filed by the management testify to the above effect . Firstparty has also not disputed the above said fact . Their Lordship of Supreme Court in a decision reported in 1997 1 SLR page 107 have made it clear that termination of services after duly selected candidate posted directly or by way of transfer is valid and the petitioner has to give place to such a candidate . In the instant case the post held by the first party has been filled by way of transfer of regular candidate and therefore, the first party cannot make any grievance of his relief from the services on his posting . In the cases like one on hand i.e. where a person was appointed on temporary basis in the management corporation, his Lordship of our Hon'ble High Court in an unreported decision in Writ Petition No. 14114/97 dated 11-7-97 laid down the principle that keeping in view the condition of the appointment order , the petitioner in the 4993 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2005
appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant document and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of theorder.
S.O. 1810. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 974/ 2004) of the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Corporation Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 20-04-2005.
[No. L - 12012/ 106/ 94 - IR (B - II) ]
C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
3. However , proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party . The second party is failed to submit a statement of claim after 10 years and 3 months , from the date of reference . Thus this Tribunal has reason to believe , that the second party is not interested in the dispute . Thus the demand of the second party for regularization of services of Shri Bhupat R. Parmar ( Workman) is not legal andjust.
Looking to the above observation I hereby pass the following order:
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
ORDER
PRESENT:
Shri B.İ. Kazi , B.Sc. , LL.M. , PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 974/04
(Old ITC No. 26/94 transferred from LT. Ahmedabad)
The demand of the Management of Gujarat Bank Workers Union, Rajkot , for regularization of services of Shri Bhupat R. Parmar , Peon ( Workman) is not proved legal and just . The workman is not entitled to any relief. No order as to cost.
Ahmedabad:
Dated: 19-12-2004
The Regional Manager, CorporationBank , Nr. Post Office, Navrangpura -380009 .
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer Vs.
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
The General Secretary, Gujarat Bank Workers Union , 8 , Rahebar Jagnath Plot, Rajkot-360001 .
APPEARANCES :
FirstParty : B.T.Upadhyay
P.S. Vsavda
SecondParty :
का.आ. 1811.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 556/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । AWARD
[सं. एल-12011/262/2002 - आई.आर. ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005 1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L- 12012 / 106/94- IR(B - II ) dated 30-09-1994 to this Tribunal for adjudication. The terms of reference is as under:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the Gujarat Bank Workers Union, Rajkot on the management of Corporation Bank, Ahmedabad for regularization of services of Shri Bhupat R. Parmar , Peon is legal and justified ? If so, what relief is the said workman entitled to . "
S.O. 1811.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 556/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad ( Gujarat ) as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 20-04-2005 2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 22-11-1994. The date to file the statement of claim was 20-10-1994 . The
[No. L- 12011 /262/2002 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .
1358 GI/ 2005-31 4994
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
ANNEXURE
Mehta, Ex . Staff Sepoy is proper andjust .
Looking to the observation I hereby pass the following order:
ORDER
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURTAT AHMEDABAD
PRESENT:
Shri B. I. Kazi B. Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 556/2004
(Old ITC No. 30/03 transferred from LT. Ahmedabad)
Whether the action of the management of Bank of India , Zonal Office Ahmedabad Zone , Ahmedabad in imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement from services on Shri Mayur J. Mehta , Ex . Staff Sepoy , Ahmedabad (Main ) Branch is proper and just. The workman is not entitled to any relief. No order as to cost . Ahmedabad .
Date : 19-12-04
The Regional Manager , Bank of India, Zonal Office , Bhadra Ahmedabad .
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
V/s.
The General Manager , Bank of India Staff Union , C/ o Bank of India , Ahmedabad and Gujarat Branches , Bhadra , Ahmedabad (Gujarat )-380.001
APPEARANCES :
का.आ. 1812.---औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदन पंख्या 383/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । : D.C. Gandhi
FirstParty
[सं. एल-12011 / 280/2000- आई.आर. ( वी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव : Absent
Second Party
AWARD
New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005 1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above by order No. L - 2011/ 262/2002 - IR (B - II ) dated 16-04-2003 to this Tribamal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under
SCHEDULE
S.O. 1812. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 383 / 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad (Gujarat ) as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India , and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 20-04-2005 .
[No. L- 12011/280/ 2000 - IR(B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India , Zonal Office , Ahmedabad Zone , Ahmedabad in imposing the punishment of compulsory retire- ment from services on Shri Mayur J. Mehta, Ex. Staff Sepoy, Ahınedabad ( Main) Branch is proper and justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT. AHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
Shri B. I. Kazi , B. Sc . , LL.M. , PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 383/2004 2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 26-05-2003 . The date to file the statement of claim was 25-07-2003 . The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim relevant document and list of reliance witness to the tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order.
(Old ITC No. 36/01 transferred from LT . Ahmedabad)
The Regional Manager , Bank of India ,
Lal Darwaja , Zonal Office Bhadra , Ahmedabad - 380 001
3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party . The second party is failed to submit a statement of claim after 1 1/2 years from the date of reference . Thus this Tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in the dispute . Thus imposing the punishment ofcompulsory retirement from services on Shri Mayur J. V/s.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4995
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
The General Manager, Bank of India Staff Union , C/ o Bank of India , Ahmedabad and Gujarat Branches , Bhadra, Ahmedabad-380001
APPEARANCES :
: D. C. Gandhi
FirstParty
: Absent
Second Party
AWARD
1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L - 12011/280 /2000 - IR (B - II) dated 30-03-2001 to this Tribunal for adjudication. The terms of reference is as under:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, in awarding punishment to Shri A.N. Thaker , Computer Operator vide order dated 1-5-99 and 13-8-99 is justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to? "
2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 5-05-01 . The date to file the statement of claim was 29-06-01 . The appropriate government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a statement of claim with relevant document and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order.
3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party. The secondparty is failed to submit a statement of claim after 3 years and 8 months from the date of reference. Thus this Tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in the dispute . Thus the punishment awarded to the second party Shri A.N. Thaker , Computer Operator vide order dated 1-5-99 and 13-8-99 isjust, proper and legal .
Looking to the observation I hereby pass the following order:
ORDER
The action of the management of Bank of India in awarding punishment to Shri A.N. Thaker , Computer Operator vide order dated 1-5-99 and 13-8-99 isjust proper and legal . The workman is not entitled to any relief. No order as to cost .
Ahmedabad. Date: 19-12-04
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005 का.आ. 1813.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011 /153/2002- आई.आर. ( बी. II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005 S.O. 1813. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen, recevied by the Central Government on 21-04-2005.
[No. L- 12011 /153/2002 - IR(B - II)] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD . PRESENT :
SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer. In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 Reference No. 2 of 2003
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management ofUnion Bank of India and their workman.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf ofthe workman : None
Onbehalfofthe employers : Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate. State : Jharkhand
Industry: Banking .
Dated, Dhanbad , the 4th April , 2005
AWARD
The Govt. of India, Ministry ofLabour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12011 / 153/ 2002- IR(B - II) dated 29-11-2002 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in depriving the opportunities to the 4996
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
[PART I-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, ATAHMEDABAD
PRESENT :
staff of Union Bank of India , Patna from posting as Adhoc Computer Operator is in violation of the provision laid down in ( i) Circular No. NRO : DP: 1509: 2002 dated 23-9-2000 (ii ) Circular No. 3913 dt . 23-10-1992 ? If not, what relief are the aggrieved workmen entitled to ?"
Shri B.I. Kazi B.Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer.
Industrial Dispute No. 515/04
(Old ITC No. 66/2002 transferred from I.T. Ahmedabad)
1. The Sr. Supdt. ofPost Offices, Deptt. of Posts Patan Sub Division , Patan (North Gujarat )
2. The Chief Post Master General , Gujarat Circle Khanpur, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) -380 001
FirstParty
V/s.
TheOrg. Secretary .
2. In this reference neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . Management however made appearance through their authorised representative . It transpires from the record that since May , 2003 no written statement has been filed bythe concerned workman/ sponsoring union. In terms of Rule 10B of the I.D. Central Rules , 1957 submission of Written Statement by the workman /sponsoring union within 15 days is mandatory one . The concerned workman/ sponsoring union not only violated the said provision of the Rules but also did not consider necessary to give any response to the notices issued consecutively by this Tribunal. It clearly shows that workman/ sponsoring union is not interested to proceed with hearing of the instant reference case . Under such circumstances, this Tribunal also finds no ground to adjourn the case suo moto for days together. Hence, the case is closed and accordingly a 'No dispute' Award is passed in this reference presuming non-existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.
The Association of Railway and PostEmployees , 15, Shasi Apartment , Nr. Anjalec Cinema, Vasna Road,
B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer
Ahmedabad(Gujarat) -380007 ..Second Party
APPEARANCES :
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
R. S. Munshi
FirstParty :
Absent
Second Party :
AWARD
का.आ. 1814.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 515/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by Order No. L - 42012/116/ 2002 - IR ( DU ) dated 05-09-2002 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terins of reference is as under:
SCHEDULE [ सं. एल-42012/ 116/ 2002 - आई.आर. ( डी. यू . ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005
"Whether the action of the management of Chief PostMater General , Ahmedabad/Supdt . of Post Offices , Patan in removing the services of Sh . Vithalbhai A. Patel is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and what other directions are necessary in the matter ?" S. 1814.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industri .: Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governinent hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 515/ 2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Ahmedabad now as shown in the annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt. of Post and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
[No. L - 42012 / 116/2002 - IR( D.U. ) ] KULDIP RAI VERMA , Desk Officer
2. The second party was issued a notice to file the statement of claim by this Tribunal on 28-11-02 . The date offile the statement of claim was 16-12-02 . The appropriate Government has also directed the second party who has raised the dispute to file a staternent of claim with relevant document and list of reliance and witnesses to the Tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of the order .
4997.
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Workman
PremNagar, Amanpur, Jabalpur
Versus
Executive,
A.I.R. Civil Construction Wing, MIG-5 , Sub-Division No.2,
3. However, proper opportunity was given by this Tribunal to file a statement of claim to the second party. The second party is failed to submit a statement of claim after 2 years and 3 months from the date of reference. Thus this Tribunal has reason to believe that the second party is not interested in the dispute. Thus the removal of second party is legal , just and proper.
Katanga, Narmada Road , Jabalpur
The ChiefEngineer ,
Looking to the above observation I hereby pass the following order.
CivilConstruction Wing, A.I.R. ,
ORDER
P.T.I. Building, New Delhi
......Management
AWARD
Passed on this 13th day of April , 2005 , The action of the management of Chief Postmaster General Ahmedabad/Supdt . of Post Offices . Patan in removing the service of Sh . Vithalbhai A. Patel is legal proper and just. The workmen is not entitled to any relief. No order as to cost .
Ahmedabad
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer
TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No. L-42012/73 /95 - IR (DU) dated 27-6-96 hasreferred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :
Dated: 19/12/04
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
" क्याप्रबंधतंत्र कार्यपालन अभियंता, सिविल कस्ट्रक्सन विंग , ऑल इंडिया रेडियो, जबलपुर ( म.प्र. ) के प्रबन्धकों द्वारा श्री धर्मदास वर्मा की सेवायें नियमित न करते हुये समाप्त किये जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायोजित है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? " का.आ. 1815.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ऑल इंडिया रेडियो के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अभिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/ 145/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-42012/73/95- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] कुलदीप राय वर्मा, डैस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005
2.After receiving the reference, it was duly registered on5/7/96 and notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim. On several dates fixed since beginning of the case , the workman and the management both remained absent . At last , the notices were issued to theparties fixing 16/12/2004 for filing statement ofclaim by workman by registered post . On this date , the workman camepresent but did not file the statement of claim. On the above date , the representative of the management also remained present. On the last date i.e. 11/4/2005 , again the parties remained absent. This case was registered as back as on 5/7/96 and since then the workman did not care to file isstatement of claim . It clearly indicates that the workman has no interest in prosecuting this reference .
3. Under the above circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .
4.The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules .
S.O. 1815. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. CGIT / LC / R / 145 / 96 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofAll India Radio , and their workmen , recevied by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer [No. L- 42012/73 /95 - IR (DU) ]
KULDIP RAI VERMA, Desk Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/ R/145/96 SHRI C.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer:
का.आ. 1816.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. प्रबंधतंत्र क्रे संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/ 194/ 95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Shri Dharam Das Verma,
[सं. एल-22012/196/1995- आई.आर. (सी- II ) ] एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव S/ o Shri Suraj Prasad Verma, C/ o J.P. Awasthy, Qr . No. 710 , Near Neekhara Atta Chakki , 4998
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005 S.O. 1816. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 194 / 95 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of WCL and their workmen , recevied by the Central Government on 25-04-2005
[No. L- 22012/ 196 / 1995 -IR (CM- II) ]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/ 194/ 95 SHRI C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer The Secretary, R.K.K.M.S. ( INTUC) , Post Chandametta , Distt . Chhindwara
..... Union/Workman
Versus
The Chief General Manager, WCL Kanhan Area , PostDungaria , Distt. Chhindwara
..Management
AWARD
Passed on this 1-4-2005 ,
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 22012 ( 196 )/ 95 - IR ( C - II ) dated 20-10-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:
Whether the action of the Manager , Mohan Colliery of WCL Kanhan Area , PO Junardeo , Distt . Chhindwara ( MP ) in not fixing/regularising Shri Moolakchand S/o Tejilal , as peon in Gr . " H " w.e.f. 18-7-87 according to the National Coal Wage Agreement is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
2.After the reference order was received , it was duly registered on 8-11-95 and notices were issued to the parties. The case was at the stage of filing Written statement by the management on 14-1-05 . On this date , Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate counsel for the management filed memorandum ofsettlement in form -H with an application praying therein that in view of settlement arrived at between the parties and the application by the workman for closure of the case, the case may be closed. The record reveals that there is an application ( Paper No. 5/2 ) moved by the workman with the prayer that the reference be closed as the matter has been compromised at between the parties . Shri A.K. Shashi, Advocate counsel for the management submitted that both
[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ] the parties have moved separate applications for closure ofthe case as the dispute has been settled between them . Itclearly points out that the parties have no interest in the case and they do not want to prosecute this reference .
3. Under the above circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .
4.The copy of the award be sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour as per rules .
C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1817.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ. सी. आई. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के वीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद नम्बर 2 ( संदर्भ संख्या 50/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -22012/51/98- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005
S.O. 1817. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/99) of the Cent . Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Dhanbad No. 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005
[No. L - 22012/51 /98 - IR ( CM - II) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD .
PRESENT :
SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer.
In the matter of Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947
1 REFERENCE No. 50/99
PARTIES:
Employer in relation to the management of Depot Manager , FCI , Dhanbad and theirworkmen .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workmen Ld . Advocate Mr. R.K. Prasad 4999
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Onbehalf of the employer : Ld . Advocate
Mr. B.N. Prasad
State : Jharkhand
: Industry : F.C.I.
Dated , Dhanbad , the 22nd March , 2005
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1 ) (d) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 22012/51/ 98 /IR ( CM - II) dated 21-01-1999 .
SCHEDULE
They submitted that the sponsoring union who raised Industrial Dispute on behalf of the concerned workmen against the management was never in existence in the establishment of F.C.I. at any period of time and for the first. time it has sponsored the present case with same ulterior motive to establish its foothold in the establishment of the Corporation. Apart from the facts stated above they submitted that no employer -employee relationship ever existed between the management and the alleged concerned workmen. They submitted further that the sponsoring union did not produce the identity cards , employment lettersor verification certificates to establish the employer- employee relationship between them and the workmen. Accordingly , they submitted prayer to reject the claim of the sponsoring union summarily .
4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED
"Whether the demand of the union for regularisation of Smt . Malti Devi and 8 other female casual labours ofFCI , Dhanbad isjustified? If so , what relief these casual labours are entitled to ? "
**Whether the demand of the union for regularisation of Smt . Malti Devi and 8 other female casual labours of FCI , Dhanbad is justified? If so , what relief these casual labours are entitled to? " .
2. The case of the concerned workmen according to written statement submitted by the sponsoring union on theirbehalf in brief is as follows:
FINDING WITH REASONS
It transpires from the record that the sponsoring union with a view to establish their claim examined two witnesses as W. W. I and W.W. 2 while managerment also in support of their claim examined one witness as M. W. 1.
They submitted that the concerned femałe workmen. as casual workers performed the duties of loading and unloading of food stuff and to clear wheat and other cereals in the godown racks of the management and platforms in the Rly connected with the godown since 1982 till 31-12-88 continuously. They submitted that the nature ofjob which the concerned female workers performed were of permanent innature.
W.W. 1 who is one of the concerned workman during her evidence disclosed that they worked under the management for 10/20 years at Barmasia godown . She disclosed that as part of their job they used to collect wheat and other foodgrains which were scattered in the open place of the godown at the time of unloading of the bags of the goodgrains from railway wagons and to keep the same in the gunny bags . She further disclosed that Somit Babu, a Clerk of F.C.1 . used to keep their attendance . Against their work she disclosed that they had to receive wages from the management after putting their LT I in the wage sheets . W. W. 2 during her evidence corroborated the facts disclosedby W. W. I in her examination in chief.
They submitted that all the concerned female workers worked continuously during the period in question as per record of the management . The management also issued a letter under Ref. No. FCI/DHN/ Casual/ 8859 dated 17-2-89 to Sri Birju Yadav DPS Labour Sardar , FCI , Dhanbad enclosing therewith the attendance of their engagement and payınent effected during the period mentioned above, acopy ofwhich also was sent to the District Manager , FCI , Hazaribagh . They alleged that management stopped the concerned female workers from work when they raised an Industrial Dispute before ALC (C ), Dhanbad for conciliation in the matter of considering their regularisation.
They alleged that management retrenched the concerned female workers without complying the provision of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 though they put their attendance for more than 240 days in each year .
Accordingly they submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to regularise the concerned workmen along with back wages and other consequential relief.
However, in course of their cross examination have failedto produce a single scrap of paper to show that they were employed by the management . No increminating material also is forth coming to expose that the concerned workınenworked under the management for inore than 240 days in each year. It is their contention that they used to drawwages, bonus etc. directly from the management on putting their LTI on the wages sheet inspite of claiming so they in support of their claim failed to produce any relevant paper.
3. Management on the contrary after filing written statement - cuin -rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in their written statement .
M.W. 1 on the contrary during his evidence categorically denied the claim of the sponsoring union that being employees of F.C.I. the concersned workmen were deployed as casual workers . This witness during his 5000
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
evidence categorically submitted that there is no existence of the present sponsoring union , i.e. , Rashtriya Mazdoor Union at any office under control ofF.C.I. in India . He also denied the fact that the concerned workmen were inembers ofthe said Union . During hearing the concerned workmen have failed to produce membership card or any paper to show that their names were enrolled as members by the sponsoring union . W.W. 1 and W.W. 2 in course of their evidence failed to give any positive answer to show that they are members of the said sponsoring union.
As per written statement submitted by the sponsoring union it transpires that the concerned workmen continuously worked under the management from 1982 to 31-12-88 as casual workers . They alleged that the management stopped them from work when Industrial Dispute was raised . As per reference it transpires that the sponsoring union raised Industrial Dispute before ALC (C) Dhanbad in the year 1999. If this fact is taken into consideration there is sufficient reason to believe that the concerned workmen worked upto 1997. On the contrary it is the specific claim of the sponsoring union that the management stopped them from work w.e.f. 31-12-88 . Therefore, it is clear that long years before raising Industrial Dispute the concerned workmen were stopped from work . If this aspect is taken into consideration there is ample scope to say that the sponsoring union in the interest of their own distorted the fact relating to stoppage of work of the concerned workmen by the management . Further , no satisfactory explanation is forthcoming on their part why they remained silent for such long years to raise Industrial Dispute on behalf of the concerned workmen particularly when they stopped from work w.e.f. 31-12-88 . The sponsoring union also in course of hearing have failed to produce a single scrap of paper to show that their union was a recognized union under the management and the name of the concerned workmen were enrolled as the members of their union .
Further allegation which the sponsoring union have brought against the management is that they illegally and arbitrarily retrenched the concerned workmen from work violating the provision of Sec . 25 of the I.D. Act. Before claiming so once absolutely was on the sponsoring union to establish that the concerned workmen were employed by the management . Question ofretrenchment is very much related with the question of employment . Until and unless a person is employed question of his retrenchment does not arise . The sponsoring union inspite of getting ample scope have lamentably failed to establish that the concerned workmen actually were employed by the management as casual workers and they worked continuously for the period in question .
When the sponsoring union have failed to substantiate this vital aspect , there is not scope to uphold their contention that management illegally retrenched them from service . There is also no scope in view of the facts
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] and circumstances discussed above to uphold their contention for their regularisation in service . In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that the sponsoring union have failed to substantiate the claim in question and for which they are not entitled to get any relief.
In the result the following award is rendered:
That the demand of the union for regularisation of Smt. Malti Devi and 8 other female casual labours of FCI , Dhanbad is not justified . Consequently the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief. " B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1818.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस. ई. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी ०जी० आई ० टी ० /एल ० सी०/आर० /204/97.) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/347/1996- आई.आर . ( सी. II ) ] एस ० एस ० गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi : the 25th April , 2005 S.O. 1818. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. CGIT/LC/R/ 204/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the inanagement of SECL and their workmen , recevied by the Central Government on 25-04-2005
[No. L- 22012/347/ 1996 - IR ( C - II) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy . ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
NO . CGIT/LC / R/204/ 97 SHRI C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer
..... Union/workman ThePresident, MP Koyla Khan Mazdoor Union ( UTUC ) , Distt. Surguja (MP)
Vensus
The Sub Area Manager , Kurasia Colliery of SECL . PostKurasia Area . Distt. Surguja (MP)
.......Management .
5001
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005 /वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
AWARD
Passed on this 4-4-2005
1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No. L -22012/347/ 96/IR ( C - II ) dated 22-7-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication. bythis tribunal :
"Whether the action of the management of Kurasia Colliery of SECL in dismissing Shri Radheyshyan, SFC, Kurasia Colliery w.e.f. 5-4-96 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled and from which date ? "
2. After the reference order was received , it was duly registered on 4-8-97 and notices were issued to the parties for filing their respective statements of claim. In this case , several times , notices were issued to the workman/Union but no body put in appearance for the workman/Union . At last the notice was issued to workman/Union by registered post which was received back with the endorsement of postal department that the address is incomplete . I have perused the reference order . The same address is given in the reference order as is written on the postal envelope. It is to be noted here that this reference wasregistered on 4-8-97 and since then workman/ Union neither put in appearance nor cared to intimate this court the change of its address if any . It appears that the workman/Union has no interest in the reference and does not want to prosecute this reference.
3. Under the above circumstances No dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs.
4. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules.
C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1819.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस. सी. सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण -1 , हैदराबाद ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/1988 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-4-2005 को' प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-21011 /28/87 - डी- III ( बी ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005 S.O. 1819. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 17/1988 ) of the Industrial Tribunal - 1 , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between 1358 GI / 2005-32
the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 25-4-2005 .
[No. - L - 21011 /28/87 -D - III (B) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- I,
HYDERABAD
PRESENT: Shri M.E.N. Patrudu,
Chairman, Industrial Tribunal- I Dated: 11th day of Februay, 2005
Industrial Dispute No. 17 of 1988 Between:
The Workman of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , P. O.Bellampalli -504251 Adilabad District , (A.P. ),
Rep. by its the Chief Vice President,
Petitioner S.C. Worker's Union
AND
TheManagement of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , P. O.Bellampalli -504251 Adilabad District, (A.P. )
Rep. by its the Chief Vice President ..Respondent APPEARANCES :
Sri B. Ganga Ram, Chief Vice President for the Petitionet. Sri . P.A.V.V. Sharma, Advocate for the Respondent.
AWARD
1.00 The dispute is whether after having declared lock -out in the second shift Jn 19-1986 in their Goleti No. 1 Inc ' ae , the action of the management of M s . Singareni Collieries Co. , Ltd. , in allowing muster to a section of workman numbering 76 and paying them their wages and denying the said benefit to other 149 workers who were also deployed to work in the same shift is fair and justifiable . If not, to what relief the said 149 workmen are entitled?
2.00 The reference is referred through order No.L- 21011 /28 /87 -D.III(B) from Government of India, Ministry of Labour, NewDelhi .
3.00 Notices were issued to both parties . Both parties appeared and filed their respective claim statement and counters .
4.00 On 4-4-1988 both sides present claim statement filed by the petitioner . Sri K. Srinivas Murthy, advocate appeared for Management and 5002
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14 , 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
Sri.B.Ganga Ram Representative appeared for the petitioner workman . Counter was filed on 7-5-1988 . There after documents were also filed and the matter was posted for enquiry to 13-7-88 as per the docket entry it is represented that the workman Management Advocate present till 14-9-1988 . There was no respresentationby workman Sri . B. Ganga Ram filed Memo of appearance for the workman, matter is posted for enquiry.
4.01 There was no representation by workman for a long period the workman did not represent ready and the matter was adjourned from time to time .
4.02 The docket entries disclose that there is no representation for the workman . The management counsel represent not ready . Though it is noted on the docket that the petitioner's evidence was closed . The fact is that there is no evidence on behalf ofpetitioner while so on behalf of respondents Ex . MI to M4 are marked and the evidence of respondent was closed .
4.03 A written arguments are filed by both sides finally on 10-11-1993 the award was passed.
5. (X) The award was challenged in the Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition 7580/1990 remitted the matter to this Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with the law after issuing notice ofboth parties concerned and further directed disposed before 11-2-2005 . Copy of the Hon'ble High Court in writ petition .
5.01 The order of the Hon'ble High Court was recevied in this Tribunal on 12-10-1994 and as such the dispute must be disposed of before 11-2-2005 hence immediate notices are issued to both parties to appear .
5.02 Notices were served on the management and notice sent to the petitioner was not returned . Records from High Court are not received, hence on 1-11-2004 fresh notice was issued to the petitioner and posted the matter to 17-11-2004 . The records from Hon'ble High Court was received on 12-10-2004 and counsel appeared.
5.03 At requested of petitioner the matter is adjourned for enquiry to 30-11-2004 . On 30-11-2004 the petitioner appeared and requested for adjournment for 17-12-2004 . From 17-12-2004 the petitioner was called absent all other dates of adjournment on 4-1-2005 the petitioner was called absent . While so on 17-1-2005 the representative of
[PART U- SEC . 3 (ii) ) the petitioner present in the Tribunal he has no evidence to be adduce there are no documents to be marked for him and the counsel for respondentrespondent requested timeto mark the documents if any and argue the matter hence the matter is posted to 25-1-2005 and thereafter 10 31-1-2005 the petitioner and his representative are absent .
5.04 Hence the matter was adjourned to 8-2-2005 and 8-2-2005 there was no representation by the petitioner Exs . M 5 to M 9 are marked for respondent and the matter is posted to 9-2-2005 there was no representation by the respondent on 9-2-2005 .
5.05 Hence arguments of the Management was heard and posted to 11-2-2005 for award.
6.00 The point for deterinination is whether the action of the respondent management in allowing muster to a section of workmen numbering 76 workmen to work after declaring a lock -out for 2nd shift in goleti No. 1 incline and deployed to work in the same shift and whether those 149 workers are entitled for wages .
7.00 POINT : The dispute is referred to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government at the request of workmen. The petitioner did not appear and did not adduce any evidence to establish any ofthe facts. All the allegations available in the refcrence are not proved though any evidence either documentary or oral by the petitioners .
7.01 Always burden lies on the petitioner to establish the facts and circumstances leading to the dispute in this case the petitioner failed to establish the same .
7.02 While so on behalf of respondent Exs.M1to M9 are filed and they disclose that workman at Golcti No. 1 incline , declared sudden strike in the 2nd shift on 1-9-86 hence there is no other option except to put the services of the 76 workmen who are available excess and extracted the work from 76 workmen as such the wages are paid to the 76 workmen. It further discloses that 149 workers did not attend the 2nd shift on 1-9-86.
7.03 In such circumstances those workmen are not -entitled for any relief of wages .
8.00 For the foregoing reasons I am of the opinion thatpetitioners are not entitled for any relief and accordingly award is passed dismissing the references . No. costs .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
5003
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
9.00 In the result , the petitioner -workmen are not entitled for any relief and accordingly Award ispassed dismissing the reference. No costs .
Dictated to the Shorthand Writer, transcribed by him, correctedand pronounced by me in the open court on this the 11thday of February , 2005 .
M.E.N. PATRUDU, Chairman APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
BEFORE REMAND
Witness examined for petitioner- workman Nil Witness examined for respondent - management MW 1 M. Ranga Rao
Documents marked for the Petitioner- workmen
-Nil-
Documents marked for the Repondent- Management Ex-M1 Circulardated 25-08-96 regarding notification of declaration Coal industry as public utility serive
Ex -M2: Xerox copy of lock out notice intimation dated 1-9-86
Muster book of 1-9-96
Ex-M3:
Ex.M4: Overmen report book for the day 1-9-86 to 6-10-86
AFTER REMAND
No oral evidence adduced by either side Documents marked for the petitioner- workman
-Nil-
Dcouments marked for the respondent-Management Ex-M5: Xerox copy of memorandum of settlement arrived at under Sec . 18 ( 1 ) of I.D. Act , on 25-8-86.
Ex-M-6 : Xerox copy of letter dated 26-8-86 issued by Director (Personal ) of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. , to All Pits & Department and All Collieries .
Ex-M7: Xerox copy ofForm N-commencement of strike, issued on 2-9-86 .
Ex-M8: Xerox copy of Form C - termination of strike, issued on 2-9-86.
Ex-M9: Carbon copy of letter dated 14-8-87 of General Manager , S.C. Co. Ltd. , to the Asst. Labour Commissioner ( C) Hyderabad .
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1820.- औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, आई० एफ ० एफ ० को० ओ ० प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1212/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-42012 / 288 / 2001 - आई. आर. ( सी एम- II ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005 S.O. 1820.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1212/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co -operative Ltd. , and their workmen , recevied by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
[No- L- 42012/288/2001 - IR(CM- II) ]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD
Present : Shri B. I. Kazi B. Sc. , L.L.M. , Presiding Officer.
Industrial Dispute No. 1212/2004
Old ITC No. 3/03 transferred from LT. Ahmedabad The Sr. General Manager,
India Farmers Fertilizer Co -operative Ltd. ,
Kandla (Kutch ) 370210
V/s.
Sh . R.K. Udasi ,
E- 158 , IFFCO Colony Udaynagar ,
Gandhidham (Kutch)
Gandhidham-370203
Appearances :
: S. B. Gogia
FirstParty
: Absent
Second Party
AWARD
1. The Government of India has referred the Industrial Dispute between the above parties by order No. L- 42012/ 288/2001 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 09-12-2002 to this Tribunal for adjudication . The terms of reference is as under:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of IFFCO , Kandala in terminating the service of Sh. R. K.
5004
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
Udasi , Office Attendant w.e.f.6-5-2000 is legal and justified ? Ifnot , to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"
2. A notice was isssued to the second party to file the statement of claim , however, by Ex. 6 the Second party union has submitted a purshish regarding settlement . Looking to this fact the union does not persue this reference and request to pass an award in terms of settlement. However , no awards has been passed till the date in the reference . Thus it was necessary for this Tribunal to pass the necessary orders looking to the facts of Ex . 6 .
3. This matter has been settled between the partics and there is no dispute to adjudicate . Hence I pass the following order.
ORDER
The parties have settled the dispute as per Annuxure . The parties should abide the settlement as per Annexure Mark 'A' . Award is passed in terms of settlement mark "A" . No order as to cost . Ahmedabad .
Date : 21-12-04
B. I. KAZI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1821.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , कापाट प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, गोवाहाटी [ संदर्भ संख्या 26 ( सी ) /2002 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42012/116/ 2002 - आईआर ( सी.एम. 11 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 25th April , 2005 S.O. 1821. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmes hereby publishes the award Ref. No.26 (C)/ 2002 of Ir strial Tribunal Guwahati as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of CAPART and their workmen , recevied by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
[No. L- 42012/ 116/2002 - IR(CM - II) ] S : S.GUPTA , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI : ASSAM.
REFRENCE NO . 26 ( C) OF 2002 ,
[PART II- SEC . 3(ii) ] Present : Shri B. Bora, PresidingOfficer , Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati . Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute between:
TheManagement of CAPART, Regional Committee (NEZ) Guwahati - 28 .
VS.
Shri Kalyan Kr . Das ,. Ex -LDC-cum -Typist.
APPEARANCES :
For the Management Shri Y. Doloi , Advocate : Shri Alok Deb , Advocate
(
}
For the workman
Shri Jyotirmoy Sarma: Advocate, Shri Gautam Soren , Advocate
Date ofAward : 29-03-2005 .
AWARD
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by a notification No.L - 42012 / 116/ 2002 - IR (CM - II ) dt . 8-11-2002 referred an Industrial Dispute between the Management of CAPART, Regional Committee ( NEZ) and their workman Shri Kalyan Kr. Das on the following issue:
"Whether the action of the Management of Council for Advancement of People's Action and Rural Technology , Regional Committee , ( NE Zone) , Guwahati -28 in terininating the services of Shri Kalyan Kumar Das , Ex - LDC- cum-Typist w.e.f. 6-7-2001 after serving for more than 5 years in the Council for Advancement of People's Action and Rural Technology , Regional Committee ( NE Zone) Guwahati is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief Sh . Kalyan Kuınar Das is entitled to ? "
1 On receipt of reference , a reference case was registered and notices were issued both parties calling upon them to file their written statements/addl , written statements and documents if any. In response to the notices both parties appeared in this Court and filed their written statements . Both parties also adduced evidences both oral and documentary in support of their respective cases .
The case of the workman Shri Kalyan Kumar Das in briefis that :
That the workman Shri Kalyan Kumar Das joined Council for Advancement of People's Action and Rural Technology (hereinafter referred to as CAPART) as a Lower Division Clerk- cum-Typist on 4th March , 1996 on daily wage basis.
5005
भारत का राजपत्र : भई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
The workman Shri Kalyan Kr . Das has prayed for 're-instatement with full wages from the date of termination to the date of re -instatement as per procedure prescribed bylaw.
Onthe otherhand the case of the management in brief is as follows :
That on June 25, 1996 an advertisement was circulated by CAPART to absorb some personnel in different categories on purely temporary basis on consolidated salary . Accordingly , the workman who have been earlier working on daily wage basis also applied and was later on invited to appear in the interview on 13-7-96 who fared very well amongst 10( ten) number of eligible candidates and got selected and thereafterjoined the said organisation as LDC - cum-Typist on Ist August , 1996 initially for 3 months. It is further pertinent to mention herein that in the Advertisement for the post of LDC - cum- Typist , the consolidated salary was shown as Rs . 2000/ - P.M. , butto the utter surprise and dismay , the workman was exploited from the very begining of his career by reducing his consolidated salary to Rs . 1,500/-Ρ.Μ.
That the workman Shri Kalyan Kr. Das was working asOffice Assistant temporarily on contractual basis and he was relieved from the service as office assistant on expiry of the contractual period on 6th of July , 2001 and aggrieved by the same relieved order the workman approached the Asstt . Labour Commissioner , Rajgarh Road , Guwahati - 3 . The Asstt . Labour Commissioner had tried to settle the issue and several joint discussions were held but no positive out put of the discussion came out .
That , the workman states that though his initial appointment was for 3 months only , the Management of CAPART had been extending the workman's term of service continuously vide its different office orders after every six months . Thus the workman continued to work upto 6-7-2001 thereafter the workman was denied/refused further extension. It is pertinent to mention herein that the workman was given a three days break after every six months so as to disrupt/discontinue his regularity but his service was fully utilized by the management by asking him to work during those break periods without letting him to sign in theAttendance Register.
That , with regard to the statements made in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the petitioner's written statement theopposite party (CAPART) states that an advertisement was issued on 25-6-96 and in response to the same 10 candidates applied and four appeared in the test/ interview . The petitioner Shri Kalyan Kr . Das could not securethe minimum marks but he was better among all four and secured only 38.2 (W.P.M. ) in type and 19 (W.P.M. ) in written test, therefore, he was appointed/hired for three months on a consolidated pay of Rs. 1500/- P.M. And subsequently he was released from his temporary service on expiry ofthe contractual period of service and subsequently hewas again hired and appointed time to time on contractual basis for a period not more than 6 months with some days gap betweeń every such engagement .
That, the workman was discharging his duties to the best of his ability and without any blemish to be satisfaction ofthe management and being satisfied with his work and amiable nature . The then Member Convenor, Dr. B.P. Naithani has designated the workman as " Administrative Assistant " on June , 22, 1999 thereby empowering him to deal with works relating to personnel , Maintenance of Office, Store Keeping, Purchase of Equipments in addition to his usual work and his fixed salary had also been increased to Rs . 3050/- from June , 24, 1999 onwards and the workman was also facilitated with annual increment of Rs . 150/- and thus the workman's revised salary after increment was Rs . 3200/- with all usual bonus as per the Govt. of India norms .
Itisfurther stated that the Head Office of Capart has submitted aproposal to Govt . for staff strength in Regional Committee of Capart for approval of posts which will be very clear from the Head Office letter dated 22-5-2000 by which the Head Office had informed to all Meinber Convenors of Regional Committees about the proposal showing requirement of staff strength as 1 post of Director , 1 postofDeputy Director/Asstt . Director, 2 posts of Research Asstt . I post of Programmer, 1 post of Accountant, 1 post of Stenographer and 1 post of Peon and as such there is no regular post of Office Assistant in the Capart regional Office at Guwahati but there is an option to hire required staff on contractual basis through service agencies upto the receiving of approval of the aforesaid proposal , and thattoo also for a period not more than 6 months .
That, on6-7-2001 , the workman's term of appointment came to end and as usual and after 3 days break and a formal application was submitted on 9-7-01 before the management for re - appointment/ extension but the present Member Convenor flatly refused to accept the application for re - appointment/extension and instead was told that service of the workman is no longer required.
*
Thatwith regard to the statements made in paragraph 3 to the petitioner's written statements it is partly denied and in this regard it is stated that there is no break of only 3 days in each appointment . The break period has been already shown in the above mentioned list and further there is no question of denial or refusal of extension of service of That, the workman submitted that the hastly decision oftheManagement in terminating the workman from service without giving him any show cause and without giving him any opportunity of hearing is a clean adoption of unfair labour practice.
5006
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24, 1927
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] the petitioner . The petitioner was appointed time to time for short period on contractual basis depending only on requirement and as there is no further requirement of the post in question and as such the petitioner's service was not further extended after expiry of last term of appointment on 6-7-2001 .
He states that he was appointed on 1-8-96 for 3 months and thereafter he was appointed for 6 months and he worked like this upto 2001. Ext . 1 (1 ) to 1 (12) are the appointment letters . Further he stated that he was asked to work during the breaks . He was given bonus for 2000 & 2001. Ext . 13 in a letter issued by the Member Convenor regarding bonus: He was not given any appointment after 2001. Neither he was given any notice . He belongs to the schedule caste . Ext . 14 is the Caste certificate .
That the statement made in paragraphs 4 and 5 , the answering deponent denies the same and in this regard it is stated that the petitioner was never designated as Administrative Assistant on a promotional basis but he was appointed by separate appointment order temporarily in the post as per requirement . It is never treated as designation of the employee like regular staff and he was duly released from his service upon expiry of the contractual term of appointment.
In his cross - examination he stated that he was first appointed for 3 months and thereafter , he was appointed for six months. This process continued till 2001. The Member Convenor appointed him everytime with break of 3days and he was released by office order on expiry of his six months term . Ext . D ( 1 ) to D (10 ) are the release orders . He further stated that he was allowed to put his signature onthe attendance register but was not allowed to sign the register during the breaks. Ext . E. attendance register. Ext . P is also an attendance register .
That, the statements made in paragraphs 11 , 12 and 13 of the petitioner's written statement , the answering deponent denies the correctness of the same and it is stated that in each appointment offer some conditions had been mentioned , these are as follows :-
(a) The contract appointment is for six months but liable to be terminated at any time before the expiry of six months time without assigning any reasons thereof.
(b) He will be responsible in assisting all administrative related works .
MW 1. Smt . Vanghoihmaan deposed that the workman was appointed as LDC - Cum -Typist in the office ofCapart on purely temporary basis. He applied in response to the advertisement Ext. 1. He was paid a consolidated salary of Rs . 1500/-P.M. She admitted that the workman was appointed for six months with breaks in between for several times . She further stated that he was appointed on contractual basis .
(c) He will entitled to avail casual leave for four days during the tenure of six inonths .
These witness further stated the workman was appointed on several occasion of 3 months everytime with short gap of 3 days and on subsequent occasions he was offered on fresh appointment for six months and he joined on4-11-96 .
(d) He will not be entitled for any benefits/ allowances as admissible to the regular employees of CAPART.
It is further stated that the Regional Committee of CAPART have no power for regular appointment and the Regional Committee have the power to hire eligible persons from service agencies temporarily on contractual basis and only for a period of 6 months in highest run. In regard to release of the petitioner from service has been done on the basis binding conditions laid down in the appointment offer and as such there is no illegality or arbitrariness has been caused to the petitioner as alleged in the petitioner's written statements .
The management has prayed for an award in its favour.
M.W. 2 Sri Kynfiew Burom Rani the Member Convenor/ Asstt . Director , Capart deposed that the workman Kalyan Kr. Das was appointed on 30-7-96 and he joined on 1-8-96 as LDC- cum-Typist and relating to the appointment and advertisement published on 25-6-96 in officenotice board of Capart. Ext . 1 is the said advertisement and appointment was purely temporary which was clearly spell out in the Advertisement itself. And during the interview the workınan was found to be only suitable candidate as the workman could not achieve the minimum speed in typing. He was paid Rs . 1,500/- P.M. instead of Rs. 2000/- at advertise . The workman was initially appointed for 3 months in a cross - examination she stated that while she joined at Capart the workman was working as LDC- cum -Typist and the qualification for the workman of LDC- cum -Typist is Graduate with diploma or certificate in typing The workman examined himself and proved some documents in support of his case. The Management on the otherhand examined two witnesses and proved some documents. I have heard the arguments of the parties . Perused the record .
Let me discuss the evidence of the witnesses before arriving at my decision . W.W. 1 is Sri Kalyan Kr . Das . He is the workmen .
from recognised institution. She further stated that in a crose - examination that the workman also receive bonus from the office . Ext. ' A' is a letter addressed to Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati by the Member Convenor , Regional Committee (NEZ ) Capart , Guwahati . Ext. A ( 1 ) is the signature , Ext. B is the certificate issued by her, Ext . B ( 1 ) is 5007 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005 /वैशांख 24 , 1927
Given under my hand and seal on this the 29th day ofMarch, 2005.
her signature and Ext . C is a certificate issued by B. Maithani , Member Convenor . Ext . C ( 1 ) is his signature .
B. BORA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. -1822.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एफ ० सी० आई ० प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निग्नोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , बेंगलोर (संदर्भ संख्या 53/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -22012/ 534/ 1999- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005
S.O. 1822. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 53/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005
[No - L- 22012/534 / 1999 - IR(CM - II) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE
Dated : 5th April , 2005
PRESENT:
Shri A.R. Siddiqui, Presiding Officer C.R. No. 53/2000
IParty
Sh . S. Venkateswarulu, Kammavaripalyam, Kavali Taluk , Nellore District. A.P.
IIParty
Only this much of evidence are available on the record. From the evidences discussed above and the documents prove by the parties it transpired to me that the workman Shri Kalyan Kr . Das was working at the office of the Capart froin 1996 to 2001. He was appointed initially for 3 months with gap of three days on several occasions . Ext . 1 to Ext . 12 are the appointment letters issued by the Member Convenor, Regional Committee, Capart . The workman also was given bonus on two occasions . Ext. 14 is another certificate issued by Member Convenor, Capart. From the evidence available on record it is seen that the workman was neither appointed as casual or daily wage basis . He was appointed as temporary employee to do office work and he was working as LDC- cum - Typist from March, 1996 to 2001. It is also seen that the management retrenched the workınan without issuing any notices as required by Section 25(F) of the I.D. Act . The workman was appointed by the management Capart on several occasions with a few days gap between the appointments in order to break the continuity of his service . This was done intentionally and illegally by the management of Capart . From Attendance Register of the employees of the Capart , it appears to me that the workman had worked at the Capart with break in service from March 1996 to 2001. The activities of Capart in appointingly the workman for a period of 3 months and six months with interval of 2 to 3 days in between the appointments are clearly against the law and illegal . The workman was.appointed by the management of Capart after due advertisement in the notice board of the office and he was appointed after due selection and he was found to be the fittest among the candidates who applied for and appeared in the interview. The post was purely temporary and the advertisement was totally silent that the candidate selected would appointed for 3 months and six months with gaps in between the appointments. This being the position the activities of management was clearly in violation of terms of advertisement . Moreover though the workman was appointed on purely temporary basis he can not be retrenched by the management without the mandatory notice as required by Sec . 25 (F ) of the I.D. Act . If the management thinks it fit to dispense with the notice Under Section 25 (F) of the I.D. Act , the inanagement is required to pay the compensation as provided by the said section . The management did not comply with either of options as mentioned above and therefore , action of the inanagement was bad in law . That being the position the termination of K.K. Das is illegal and not at all justified.
The District Manager , FCI District Office, No. 25, ResidencyRoad , Sabari Complex , III Floor , Bangalore- 25 .
APPEARANCES :
Thisbeing the position the management of Capart is directed to re - engage Shri Kalyan Kr . Das as LDC - cum- Typist within 45 days from today in its office w.e.f. the date ofhis termination . Management is also directed to pay all the financial benefit to the workman from date of his ternunation till the date of re - appointment . The reference is answered in favour of the workman.
1Party : Sh. V.S. Naik Advocate 5008
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
11 Party
Sh . A.S. Boppanna/ Sh . Goreppa, Advocate
AWARD
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by Clause ( d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dipsute vide Order No. L- 22012/534/99- IR (CM - II ) dated 06-07-2000 for adjudication on the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
"Whether Sh . S. Venkateswarulu Employee No. 21023 ofK.R. Puram , F.C.I. is justified in claiming re- employment ? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?".
2. The case of the I party as made out in the Claim Statement at Paras 2 to 6 of the Claim Statement is as follows:
" Para 2: The first party was appointed as a Handling Labourer during the year 1990. He was initially appointed by the contractor , namely Karnataka Contract Labour and Transport Co - opetative Society Limited. The first party workman was assigned duties as a Handling Labourer in the K.R. Puram Godown belonging to the Food Corporation of India . It is submitted that the contract labour in the K.R. Godown and other 4 godowns in the State of Karnataka was abolished w.e.f. 1-11-1990 as per the notification issued by the appropriate Government under the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act , 1970 ( hereinafter called as the "Contract Labour Act ' ) . In spite of abolition of the contract labour, the management of Food Corporation of India did not take any action to departmentalize the workmen working in these 5 godowns . Ultimately , the Food Corporation of India Workers ' Union took up the matter before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka by filing a Writ Petition in W.P. No. 24485/ 94. That Writ Petition came to be allowed and ultimately a scheme was formulated based on which the second party management started identification of the workmen for the purpose of depart- mentalization . The direct payment system was introduced in these godowns on 22-4-1996 . It is submitted that the first party workman was one amongst several such workmen whose services caine tobe reguralised . It is further submitted that the first party workman was covered under the ESI with Insurance No. 14010788 while he was working under the contract . He was also a subscriber under the Provident Fund Scheme , but he did not receive proper statement from his employer , namely the then contractor . Be that as it may , the second party
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] management started regularizing the services of the workmen in a phased manner . The contract labourers employed in these 5 godowns were taken in batches on verification of the service particulars of those workmen. The first party workman was indicate in the third batch and he was given Employee No. 21023 . Heworked for two days during July 1996. Thereafter, he went to his native place for some family work . Before going , he had also informed the depot Manager about the requirement of leave . It is submitted that when he came back to his work there was some problem between the Food Corporation of India Workers ' Union and the local union in the matter of regularization of the services of the contract labourers in this godown. In this conflict , the first partyworkman was not given work and he was made to await further directions . The first party workman went on approaching the management, but he was not given any reply in this regard. In fact , the first party workman was prepared to commence his work and when he went to the depot on 1-8-1996 he was not offered work . It is sumbitted that the first party workman wa on the rolls of the K.R. Puram Depot as on that date. It is submitted that the first party workman being a person hailing from Andhra Pradesh State was not having any permanent shelter in Bangalore nevertheless he managed to stay in Bangalore and he used to approach the authorities to provide him work . Since he did not get any proper reply , he has been advised to raise this dispute ..
Para 3 : It is submitted that the first party workman was earlier working in the K.R.P.G. Depot having joined the services during 1990 as handling labourer . He was cover under ESI and P.F. Schemes . He was also issued Identity Card by the Contractor .However, the management refused employer after he was brought under Direct Payment System . The management refused employment w.e.f. 1-8-1996 without assigning any reasons and also no memo or notice was issued in this regard. Hence, the action of the second party management is arbitrary and illegal .
Para 4 : It is submitted that the action of the management amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2 ( 00) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Admittedly the management has not complied with the requirement of Section 25 of the Act . The management is also bound by the mandatory provisions ofChapter - V. A and V.B. of the Act . Hence the action of the management is unjust and untenable.
Para 5 : It is submitted that the efforts made by the first party workman to rejoin the duty did not materialize . Hence he has been advised to raise this dispute. Since the second party management refused [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
employment, the first party prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the second party management to provide work to the first party workman . He is ready and willing to perform his duties .
Para 6 : It is submitted that the workman raised an industrial dispute by filing a petition before the ConciliationOfficer . In the conciliation proceedings the second party management took up a contention that the first party workman worked just for 2 days in July 1996 and thereafter left the service without informing anybody. The further contention of the employer is that a notice was issued to him along with 11 others to rejoin the duties but the first party did not report for work. By stating thus the employer contents that action was taken in accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Establishment ( Standing Orders) Central Rules , 1946. It is submitted that the services of the workman ought not to have been terminated by invoking the above said provisions . Admittedly the provision of the Industrial Disputes Act overrides the provisions of the Industrial Establishment (Standing Orders) Central Rules , 1946. Hence the contention of the second party management cannot be sustained and it is devoid of merits . Since the conciliation ended in failure the dispute has been referred to this Hon'ble Court for industrial adjudication. Hence the Claim Statement . " 3. Whereas the management resisted the claim of the 1 party by filing counter statement and the contentions taken by the management at paras 2 to 6 are as under :
"Para 2 : It is submitted that the first party was working as Handling Labour under a contractor. It is true that the contract labour in the K.R. Godown and other four Godowns in the State of Karnataka was abolished . It is further sumbitted that direct payment system was introduced in K.R. Puram Depot of FCI on 24-4-96 , since the depot was notified by the Government of India under the contract Labour ( R & A) Act . It is true that the first party The Food Corporation of India Workers Union filed W.P. No. 24485/94 . The Hon'ble High Court had allowed the Writ Petition . Hence Labourers were statement to enrolled on 22-4-96 . The first party was enrolled on 17-7-96 on the basis of an EPF Slip bearing No. 0731 produced by him . He was allotted employee No. 21023 and he was attached to second batch . The first party worked justfor two days in July 1996 and has left without informing the Depot Manager about the requirement of leave . It is denied that when he came back to his work there was problem between the Food Corporation of India Workers Union and the local union in the matter of regularisation of 1358 Gl /2005-33
5009 the services of the Contract labourers in the godown . It is further denied that in this conflict the first party was not given work . It is denied that he was approaching the management but he was not given reply. The first party never visited the second party after July 1996. The second party issued notice to the first party along with 11 others to rejoin duty immediately . The first party never replied to the notice nor he reported for duty .
Para 3 : It is submitted that the first party was working in the KRPG Depot . The second party is not aware thathe was covered under ESI and PF Schemes and he was issued identity card by the contractor . It is denied that the second party refused employment after he was brought under Direct Payment Systems . It is denied that the second party refused employment w.e.f. 1-8-96 without giving reasons . Notice was issued to the first party to rejoin the duties . The first party never responded to the notice not he reported for duty . The action of the second party is not arbitrary and illegal .
Para 4 : It is submitted that the action of the management does not amounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2 (00) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The question of second party complying the Section 25 (F) 3 of the ID Act does not arise . The action of the Management is justified .
Para5 : It is submitted that the averments made by thefirst party at para 5 in the claim statement is false and denied. It is denied that the efforts were made by the first party to rejoin the duty . The question of refusal does not arise . It is submitted that the action takenby the second party isjustified and reasonable. The question of re - employment does not arise . The firstparty absented from work despite notice given by the second party he failed to rejoin the duty.
Para 6 : In view of the reasons explained supra the second party respectfully prays that the Tribunal to reject the claims of the first party workman for his re- instatement due to the fact that the work for which he was engaged is not available .'
4. As per the points of reference burden cast upon the I party to justify his claim of re - employment with the management so as to get the relief accordingly . The order sheet maintained by this tribunal would disclose that despite several adjournments and sufficient opportunity given to the I party , he failed to adduce any evidence much less stepping himself into the witness box . On the other hand , the Management led evidence of one Mr. K. Viswanath , working as Assistant Manager in support ofthe contentions taken by it in the Counter Statement referred to supra. He was however , cross - examined for the party but no attempt was made on his behalf to lead 5010
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
ORDER
evidence , atleast , after the management witness was examined.
Reference is dismissed . No order to costs .
(Dictated to the L.D.C. , transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 5th April , 2005 )
A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1823.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, आई.जी.व.अ.आ.मे. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, लखनऊ (संदर्भ संख्या 117/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
एल -42012/299/2003 - आई.आर. ( सी एम- II ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005
S.O. 1823 .-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 117/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indira Gandhi Rastriya Van Academy Officer Mess and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25-04- 2005.
[No. L-42012/299/2003 - IR(CM- II) ] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW PRESENT :
5. Learned counsel for the management , in the light of the above submitted that the I party has failed to substantiate his claim before this tribunal and therefore reference is liable to be rejected . I find substance in his arguments . In the instant case undisputedly , the I party was working with the Management through Contractor uptill year 1996. When the direct payment system was introduced in the aforesaid 4 godowns ofthe Management in the light of the directions made by the Hon'ble High Court in the above said Writ Petition No. 24485/94 . In the very words of the I party has indicated in para 2 of the Claim Statement , he worked only for 2 days during the month of July 1996 after the above said payment system was introduced. It is his case that after having worked for 2 days in the month of July 1996 he went on leave informing the Depot Manager and when he came back to report the duty on 01-08-1996 he was refused work by the Management . Now assuming for a moment that he was refused work by the Management w.e.f. 01-08-1996 , it is not understandable how he is going to establish his right of re -employment with the Management when he undisputedly worked only for 2 days in the month of July 1996 when the above said direct payment system was introduced w.e.f. 22-04-1996 after the abolition of contract labour system w.e.f. 01-11-1990 as per the notification issued by the appropriate Government under the provisions of the Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 , particularly, when it is the case of the I party himself that despite the abolition of contract iabour act , the corporation did not take any action to departmentalize the workman working in the aforesaid godowns . Therefore , the I party admittedly having not worked with the Management for a period of 240 days or more in a particular calendar year , his case cannot be brought under the provisions of 2( oo) of the ID Act read with Section 25 ( f) thereof.
Shrikant Shukla , Presiding Officer LD . No. 117/2004 L-42012/299 /2003 - IR(CM- II ) dated: 17-8-2004 BETWEEN :
Sh . Bhawan Singh S/o Late Sh . Nag Singh , R/ o FRI , Quarter No. G -6 , Dehradun AND The Vice President,
Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Van Academy Officer Mess , Forest Research Institute , P.O. New Forest, Dehradun ..
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide their Order No. L -42012/299/2003 - IR(CM - II) dated 17-8-2004, referred the following dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Lucknow.
6. Moreover, as noted above , the I party did not choose to led any oral or ducumentary evidence nor took pains to enter into the witness box to substantiate the contentions taken by him in the Claim Statement . On the . other hands noted above , it is the Management which adduced the evidence of above said witness by name K. Viswanath and he deposed to the fact narrated in the Counter Statement . His statement in cross - examination remaind unshaken not disputing the fact that the I party was in the service of the Management only for two days and that in between period from 1990 to 1996 , he was working with the Management only through the Contractor. In the result , this court has no hesitation to come to the conclusion that I party workman fails to establish his claim of re -employment with the Management and accordingly, the reference is answered by following order.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5011
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14 , 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
"Whether the action of the management of Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Van Academy Officer Mess ( IGNFA) månagement in terminating the services of Sh . Bhawan Singh , S/ o Late Sh . Nag Singh , Mess Bearer w.e.f. 8-4-99 is legal and justified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled ?" The said order was marked to the Presiding Officer , Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Lucknow besides Sh . Bhawan Singh , S/ o Late Sh . Nag Singh , R/ o FRI , Quarter No.G -6 , Dehradun and the Vice President, Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Van Academy Officer Mess, Forest Research Institute, P.O. New Forest Delhradun.
Itwas made clear to the parties raising the dispute to file the statement complete with relevant documents , list of reliance and witnesses with the Tribunal within fifteen days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such a statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in this dispute under rule 10 ( B) of the Industrial Disputes ( Central ), Rules 1957 .
The said order of reference was received in the office of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Lucknow- on 8-12-2004, but, the worker, Bhawan Singh did not file any statement of claim , challenging the termination of services of Sh . Bhawan Singh . When the worker did not file the stateinent of claim together with the relevant documents , list of reliance and witnesses etc. till 6-1-2005 , registered summon was sent to the worker on 7-1-2005 vide postal receipt No. 4608 dated 12-1-2005 . The registered article returned with the remark " इस नं. में इस नाम कोई नहीं " on 19-1-2005 .
The worker did not file any statement of claim , alleging that the termination of services by punishment imposed by the Vice President , Indira Gandhi Rashtriya VanAcademy Officer Mess , FRI , Dehradun was illegal or unjustified .
The Vice President , Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Van Academy Officer Mess , FRI , Dehradun was also issued registered notice and in response to the notice Sh . A.M. Singh , Vice President , Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Van Academy Officer Mess . FRI , Dehradun sent a letter No. VP Mess/2005 - NFA did . 17-2-2005 by fax as well as by post , seeing time for appearance . Subsequently, the case was listed for hearing/written statement at the camp couit, Dehradun , but none appeared from opposite party before this Tribunal nor the written statement was filed .
There is no material available on the record to arrive on the conclusion as to whether action of the management was legal or illegal; justified or unjustified . In the circumstances . I have no other option then to pass No Claim Award .
Lucknow: 11-4-2005
SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल , 2005
का.आ. 1824.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.ई.स्त्री.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर./ 156/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/24/95- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005
S.O. 1824. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. CGIT/LC/R/ 156/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
[No. L -22012/24/ 95 - IR( C - II) ] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 156/ 95
Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. Singh
Union/Workman Shri Jagdish Singh , General Secretary, Koyla Mazdoor Sabha ( UTUC ) , PostDhanpuri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) .
Versus
Management The Sub Area Manager , Budhar Group of Mines of SECL , PostDhanpuri , Distt . Shahdol (MP)
AWARD
Passed on this 1-4-2005
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , vide its Notification No. L -22012/24/ 95 - IR(C - II ) dated 29-8-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:-
"क्या प्रबंधतंत्र, महाप्रबंधक सुहागपुर क्षेत्र, एस.ई.सी.एल. , पोस्ट- धनपुरी , जिला- शहडोल ( म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्रीकमलभान सिंह, फोरमैन ( मैकेनिकल ) , रीजनल वर्कशॉप, बुढ़ार को दिनांक 1-7-93 को 59 वर्ष की आयु में सेवानिवृत्ति के एक वर्ष पूर्व ही सेवानिवृत्त किये जाने की कार्यवाही 5012
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
यायौचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? "
2. After the reference order was received, it was duly registered on 11-9-95 and notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim . The workman filed his stateinent of claim and the management filed the Written Statement . Thereafter the workman/Union absented itself on several dates fixed in the case . At last notice was issued to the workman/Union by registered AD post . Inspite of sufficient service of notice , the workman/Union failed to put in appearance . It clearly indicates that the workman/ Union is not interested in prosecuting this reference .
3.Under the above circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .
C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1825.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर./ 105/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/533/94- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005
S.O. 1825. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 105/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the mangagement of SECL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
[No. L -22012/ 533 /94 - IR( C - II ) ] S.S. GUPTA , Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
NO . CGIT/LC /R/ 105/95
Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. Singh
... Union/Workmen Shri Jagdish Singh , General Secretary , Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (UTUC ) , PostDhanpuri , Distt. Shahdol (MP) .
Versus
The S. A. M. Burhar and Navgaon Sub Area , SECL , Post Dhanpuri , Distt . Shahdol ( MP)
[PART -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
AWARD
Passed on this 1-4-2005
1. TheGovernment on India , Ministry ofLabour, vide itsNotificationNo. L - 22012/ 533/94 - IR (C- II) dated 1-6-95 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:-
"क्या प्रबंधतंत्र सब- एरिया मैनेजर, बुढ़ार नवगांव सब - एरिया, साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड लि. , पोस्ट- धनपुरी , जिला- शहडोल (म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्री रामकरन टो. न. 1502 एवं श्री मेदीलाल टो. न. 832, बुढ़ार कालरी नं. 3 को सन 1985 से निरन्तर रूप से लोडिंग सुपरवाइजर/मेट का कार्य लिए जाने के आधार पर लोडिंग सुपरवाइजर मेट के पद पर नियमित न किये जाने अर्थात् पदनामित न किये जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो संबंधित कर्मकारगण किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? "
2. After the reference order was received , it was duly registered on 7-6-95 and notices were issued to the parties for filing their respective statements of claim . The workmen /Union filed statement of claim and the management filed the Written Statement and thereafter the workmen/Union absented himself from appearing on the dates fixed in the case . At last notice was issued to the workmen/Union by registered AD post . But inspite of sufficient service of notice , the workmen/Union failed to putin appearance and on the last date i.e. on 31-3-2005 , no one put in appearance on behalf of management also . This clearly indicate that the parties are not interested in prosecuting this reference .
3. Under the above circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .
4. The copy of award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour as per rules .
C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1826.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. /एल.सी./आर./126/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/73/94- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th April , 2005
S.O. 1826. In pursuancesuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/ R/ 126 / 94 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
Managcinent
[भाग [I- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
management of WCL and their workınen received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
5013
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[No. L -22012/73/ 94 - IR(C-II )]
S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
NO . CGIT /LC/R/ 126/94
Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. SINGH
The General Secretary ,
Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Sangh ,
Vishwakarma Bhavan,
PO Parasia ,
.Union/Workman Distt. Chhindwara (MP) .
Versus
The Dy . Chief Mechancial Engineer. W.C.L. At & PO Rawanwara ,
Distt. Chhindwara (MP)
Management
AWARD
Passed on this 11th day of April, 2005.
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, vide its Notification No. L- 22012/73/94 - IR( C - II) dated 3-8-94, has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:-
"Whether the action of the management of Rawanwara Khas Colliery of Western Coalfields Ltd. , Pench Area is justified in terminating the services of Shri Hiraman S/ o Shri Gulab , Timber Mazdoor Rawanwara Khas Colliery of WCL with effect from 3-2-92 ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?"
2. The workman's case in brief is as follows : Shri Hiramani workman was employed as Timber Mazdoor at Rawanwara Khas Collicry of WCL , Pench Area since long time . He proceeded to his native place on sanctioned leave sometimes in the year 1985 , but fell ill there and could not resume his duty after expiry of leave . He reported on duty after recovery with a medical certificate , but was not allowed to resume ; rather he was served with chargesheet dated 19-12-85 with the charge that he remained unauthorisedly absent from duty. He replied the chargeshseet , denying the charge and closing therewith the medical certificate , in support of his illnes . Even then , the charges were enquired into appointing Shri B.K. Bartharc , Asstt . Manager as Enquiry Officer . That the workman participated in the enquiry proceedings but outcome of the proceedings was not disclosed to him . The enquiry proceedings was completed on 16-1-86 without any conclusion . Very surprisingly on 25-12-91 , he was again chargesheeted for the same charges . The workman again participated in the enquiry proceedings accompanied with a co- 1358 GI /2005-34
worker . During the course of enquiry proceedings , the co -worker raised question relating to defence of the workman involving same charges for the alleged un- authorised absence for the same period . But the management's representative failed to reply leading to controversy which resulted in withdrawal of the workman and his co - worker from the enquiry proceedings . Thus the enquiry proceedings ended exparte holding the workman guilty of misconduct and he was dismissed from service vide order dated 3-12-92. It was prayed by the workman that the action of the management terininating his services w.e.f: 3-2-92 is illegal and unjustified and therefore , he be reinstated with all back wages and benefits .
3. According to the pleadings of the management , the case of the management in brief is as follows . The workman was working as Timber Mazdoor with the management . He was absent unauthorisedly without permission or sanctioned leave by the Competent Authority w.e.f. February 1985. He was served with chargesheet dated 19-12-85 . Thereafter an enquiry was ordered. Before the enquiry could be completed, the workman had a gain absconded and therefore the enquiry could not be completed. His whereabouts were not known and he remained unauthorisedly absent . Therefore a second chargesheet was issued to him on 20-1-92 for his unauthorised absence . As his reply to the chargesheet was not satisfactorily Shri S.K. Puri , Sr. Personnal Officer was appointed as Enquiry Officer to conduct the enquiry into the chargesheet issued to the workman regarding his unauthorised absence from February 1985. During the course of enquiry , the workman insisted that he may be permitted to join duty and only then the Enquiry could proceed . He also insisted that he should be paid compensation . The Enquiry Officer intimated to him that he could not do so as an Enquiry Officer . Thereafter the workman refused to participate in the enquiry . The Enquiry Officer had to complete enquiry in the absence of workman. He gave his finding holding the workman guilty of the charge . On the basis of the findings of Enquiry Officer by the impugned order of punishment of dismissal from service. was imposed on the workman . the Enquiry was properly and legally conducted . The workman is not entitled to any relief.
4. The record of reference reveals that on 11-4-96 , the management filed departmental enquiry papers which were denied by the workinan . The management examined Shri S.K. Puri , Enquiry Officer , who then was working as Sr. Personnel Manager Wani area of WCL , Chandrapur (MS) for proving that enquiry was held Fiairly and legally .
5. My learned predecessor -in -office after having heard the learned counsel for the partics and after having gone through the record , recorded findings on the following priliminary issue vide order dated 23-8-99 .
"Whether the procedure adopted in the Departmental Enquiry is proper , valid and legal ?" 5014
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
FINDINGS
8. In view of the above , it is concluded that the action of the manageinent of Rawanwara Khas Colliery of WCL , Pench Area is justified in terminating the services of Shri Hiralal , S/o Shri Gulab, Timber Mazdoor , Rawanwara Khas Colliery of WCL w.e.f. 3-2-92. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the management and against the workman . The costs shall remain easy .
My learned predecessor in officer recorded finding on the above priliminary issue in the affirmative in favour ofthe management and against the workman and held that the procedure adopted by Shri S.K. Puri , Departmental Enquiry Officer is proper, valid and legal . The finding dated 23-8-99 on the above issue shall form the part of the award.
9. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules .
C.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल , 2005 6. 1 have heard Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate learned counsel for the management and perused the record. I could not have an opportunity of hearing the learned counsel for the workman or the workman in person as no body appeared on behalf of workman on the date of hearing.
का.आ. 1827.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी. जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर/53 /95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-04-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/492/94- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005
S.O. 1827. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/LC /R/ 53 / 95) of the Central Government Industiral Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 25-04-2005 .
[No. L -22012/492/ 94 - IR(C - II) ] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
NO . CGIT/LC/ R/ 53/95
Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. Singh
TheGeneral Secretary.
... Union/Workman
M.P. Koyla Mazdoor Sabha ( HMS ) , Post South Jhagrakhand Colliery, Distt. Surguja (MP)
Versus
...Management
The Sub Area Manager, WestChirimiri Colliery , PostWest Chirimiri , Distt . Surguja
AWARD
Passed on this 12th day of April , 2005 7. The learned counsel for the management submitted thatthe Disciplinary Authority after having duly considered the report of Enquiry Officer and on examining the entire enquiry proceedings being fully satisfied that the charges stood proved accepted the enquiry report . That he after considering all the aspects of the case specially the extreme gravity of the charges that the workman remained absent from duty unauthorisedly without any intimation or sanctioned leave for about a period of 7 years rightly imposed upon him the penality of dismissal from service. The learned counsel further submitted that under the facts and circumstances of this case, this tribunal is requested not to exercise its jurisdiction under Sec . - 11 - A of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 to award lesser punishment than the dismissal from service . in this respect he placed reliance on 1998 ( 1 ) LLJ - 431 in the case of Union of india and others versus Shrivastava B.K. I have very carefully gone through the law cited above . It has been hole ther that if the DE conducted is fair and legal and there ha been lawful exercise of power by the Disciplinary and Appellate Authority, the Tribunal should stay its hands . That it is no part of function of the tribunal to substitute its own decision when enquiry is held in accordance with rules and the punishment is imposed by the authorities considering all the relevant circumstances and which it is entitled to impose . The learned counsel for the management also placed reliance on 1995 I - L LJ 1065 in the case ofA.M. Ishwarchar Vrs . Executive Engineer Electrical wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka held that under the guise of sympathy, there can be no compromise in cases of gross in discipline. That sympathy will be shown in appropraite cases and the courts in this country have frequently observed that misplaced sympathy results in miscarriage ofjustice . In the case at hand there is no prayer on behalf of the workman that the lesser penalty be imposed on him as punishment . The charge of remaining absent from duties for about a period of 7 years without any intimatlon unauthorisedly has been proved against the workman as an outcome of Departmental Enquiry which was conducted fairly and legally. Under the circumstances , I am of the considered opinion that it is not a fit case in which lesser punishment than dismissal from service be awarded.
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 220012( 492) / 94 - IR ( C.II ) dated 2-3-95 5015
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-
"Whether the action of the Sub Area Manager, West Chirimiri Colliery of Chirimiri Area of SECL in dismissing Shri Bhokali, S/o Juria , Tub Loader , West Chirimiri Colliery from company services w.e.f. 5-1-94 is legal andjustified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
2. After the reference order was received, it was duly registered on 13-3-95 and notices were issued to the parties for filing their respective statements of claim, on 29-12-04, Shri N.L. Pandey General Secretary of the Union/Workman in the presence of Shri S.K. Mishra , Advocate for management orally submitted that the Union/workman does not want to contest this case . It clearly indicates that the Union/workınan does not want to prosecute this reference .
3. Under the circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs.
4. The copy of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour as per rules .
C.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का.आ. 1828.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर, (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर. / 205/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-4-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/348/1996- आई.आर. ( सी- II ) ]
एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 25th April, 2005
S.O. 1828. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/ 205 / 97 ofthe Central Government Industiral Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SECL , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25-4-2005.
[No. L -22012/348/ 1996 - IR( C-II) ]
S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT ,
JABALPUR
NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 205/97
SHRI C.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer The President
M.P. Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Union ,
Chirimiri Area , Post Kursia Colliery ,
...Union/Workman Distt . Surguja (MP)
Versus
The Sub AreaManager ,
N.C.P.H. Colliery of SECL . Haldibadi Distt . Surguja (MP)
....Management
AWARD
Passed on this 4th day of April, 2005 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No. L -22012 (348 )/96 - IR C.II dated 22-7-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-
"Whether the action of the management of NCPH Colliery of SECL , Chirmiri Area in dismissing Sh. Nanhuram, General Mazdoor, from service w.e.f. 27-4-91 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled and from which date ?" 2. After the reference order was received, it was duly registered on 4-8-97 and notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim . The record reveals that since the date of registration of the reference , 3 times notice was issued to the workman/Union by registered post . The first time issued notice received back with the endorsement that the address of the addressee is incomplete . The same address is written on the postal envelope which is given in the reference order. Second tiine issued notice to the workman/ union by registered post was received back with the endorsement of the postal department "Not Found " and lastly the notice issued to workman /Union was again received back with the endorsement of postal department that the address is incomplete and hence returned . As already mentioned above , the reference was registered on 4-8-97 and since then the workman/Union did not care to put in appearance or to intimate this court, the change of its address if any. It appears from the above that the workman/Union has no interest in the reference and does not want to prosecute this reference.
3. Under the circumstances , No Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .
4. The copy of the award be sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour as per rules.
C.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नईदिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2005
का. आ. 1829. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, एस.ई.सी. एल. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर (संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी./एल.सी./आर/254/ 97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-4-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -22012/414/1996- आई.आर. ( सी. - II ) ]
एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव 5016
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005/VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
New Delhi , the 25th April, 2005 S.O. 1829.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 254/97 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour, Court, Jablalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of SECL and their workmen , recevied by the Central Government on 25-4-2005
[No- L-22012/414/ 1996 - IR(C - II) ]
S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 254/ 97
SHRI C.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer:
The President ,
Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh , (INTUC ) Branch Dipika Pariyojana ,
PostGevra Pariyojana ,
: Union/workman Distt . Bilaspur (MP)
Versus
The Sub Area Manager ,
SECL, Balgi Pariyojana, PostBalgi Pariyojana ,
: Management Distt. Bilaspur(MP)
AWARD
Passed on this 4th day of April , 2005 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No , L - 22012 /414/ 96 IR( C - II ) dated 29-8/3-9/97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :
"Whether the action of the management of Balgi Project of SECL, Bilaspur in terminating the services of Shri Sukliau Ram, General Mazdoor Cat I w.e.f. 5-10-91 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the worsman entitled and from which date ? " 2. A the reference order was received, it was duly registered 01. 7-9-97 and notices were issued to the parties to file their respective statements of claim . In this case, on several dates , the notices were issued to the workman/ Union . But the workman/Union did not turn up . At last the notice was issued to the workman/Union by registered post which was received back with the endorsement of the postal department that the addressee did not meet on the given address . I have perused the reference order . The same address of workman/Union is mentioned in the reference order as is written on the postal envelope . It is worthwhile to note here that this reference order was
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] registered on 17-9-97 and since then, the workman/ Union neither turned up for filing the statement of claim nor intimated the change of address if any to this court . Under the circumstances , it appears that the workman/Union has no interest in this reference and does not want to prosecute this reference.
3. Since the workman/ Union does not want to prosecute this reference , No. Dispute Award is passed without any order as to costs .
4. Copy of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour as per rules.
C.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer श्रम, एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 9 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1830. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 1 जून, 2005 को उस तारीख केरूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबन्ध पंजाब के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्,
" जिला एवं तहसील लुधियाना में राजस्व ग्राम आलमगीर हदबस्त संख्या-273 के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र "
[संख्या एस -38013/20/ 2005 - एस.एस. - 1 ]
के.सी. जैन, निदेशक MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 9th May , 2005 S.O. 1830. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :-
"Areas comprising the Revenue Village of Alamgir HadBast No. 273 in Tehsil and District of Ludhiana. "
[No. S -38013/20/2005 -S.S.I. ]
K. C. JAIN , Director नई दिल्ली, 9 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1831.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का 5017
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24 , 1927
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 जून, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (धारा 44 व 45 के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है के उपबन्ध पंजाब के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्: -
क्रं.सं. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम हदबस्त संख्या तहसील एवं जिला 1. उच्ची मंगली
235
लुधियाना
236
2. रामगढ
लुधियाना
225
3. जन्डीयाली
लुधियाना
187
लुधियाना 4. बुधेवाल
224
5. कोहाड़ा
लुधियाना
223
6. मानगढ़
लुधियाना
217
7. हीरान
लुधियाना
337/338
8. लाल कलां
लुधियाना
222
लुधियाना/समराला 9. भैरों मुन्ना
10. हाडीया
206
लुधियाना
[संख्या एस-38013/21/2005- एस.एस. - 1 ] के.सी. जैन, निदेशक New Delhi , the 9th May , 2005 S.O. 1831. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter - V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :-
Tehsil and District Sl . Name of the No. Revenue Village
Hadbast No.
235
Ludhiana 1. Uchi Mangali
236
Ludhiana 2. Ramgarh
225
3. Jandiali
Ludhiana
187
Ludhiana 4. Budhewal
Ludhiana 5. Kohara
224
223
Ludhiana 6. Maangarh
217
7. Hiran
Ludhiana 8. Lalkalan
237/338 Ludhiana
Ludhiana/ Samrala 9. Bhairon Munna 222
206
Ludhiana 10. Hadia
[No. S - 38013/21/2005 -S.S - I ]
K.C. JAIN, Director नई दिल्ली, 9 मई, 2005
का.आ. 1832.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 जून, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (धारा 44 व 45 के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध पंजाब के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: -
तहसील एवं जिला क्रं.सं. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम हदबस्त संख्या
143
1. गाहोर
लुधियाना
294
2. बद्दोवाल
लुधियाना 3. बाडेवाल
157
लुधियाना
153
लुधियाना 4. ईयाली खुर्द
155
5. ईयाली कलां
लुधियाना
[संख्या एस -38013/22 / 2005 - एस.एस.- I ] के.सी. जैन, निदेशक New Delhi , the 9th May , 2005 S.O. 1832. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI [ except sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :-
Hadbast No. Tehsil and District Sl . Name of the No. Revenue Village
1. Gahor
143
Ludhiana
294
Ludhiana 2. Baddowal
Ludhiana 3. Barewal
157
153
Ludhiana 4. Eyali Khurd
155
Ludhiana 5. Eyali Kalan
[No. S - 38013 /22/ 2005 -S.S - I ] K.C. JAIN , Director नई दिल्ली, 9 मई , 2005
का.आ. 1833.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 जून, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (धारा 44 व 45 के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध पंजाब के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्: - 5018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 14, 2005 /VAISAKHA 24, 1927
" जिला- सगरूर में राजस्व ग्राम बर्द्धवाल हदबस्त संख्या 92 के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र " ।
[संख्या एस-38013/23/ 2005 - एस.एस.- I]
के.सी. जैन, निदेशक New Delhi , the 9th May , 2005 S.O. 1833. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st June , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV [ except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force] and Chapter - V and VI ( except sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :-
"Areas comprising the Revenue Village of Bardwal Hadbast No. 92 in District of Sangrur . "
[No. S - 38013/23/ 2005 -S.S - I ] K. C. JAIN , Director नई दिल्ली, 10 मई , 2005
का.आ. 1834.-जबकि इंडियन एयरलाइन्स तथा उनके प्रबंधन और उनके कामगारों, जिनका प्रतिनिधित्व ऑल इंडिया एयरक्राफ्ट इजीनियर्स एसोसिएशन और इंडियन एयरक्राफ्ट टेक्नीशियन एसोसिएशन द्वारा किया जा रहा है , के बीच एक औद्योगिक विवाद विद्यमान है ;
और जबकि, उक्त प्रबंधन तथा उनके कामगारों जिनका प्रतिनिधित्व उक्त संघों द्वारा किया जा रहा है, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 10 क की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत एक लिखित करार द्वारा उक्त विवाद को न्यायमूर्ति श्री के. राममूर्ति ( सेवानिवृत्त ) के पास विवाचन हेतु भेजने को सहमत हैं और औद्योगिक विवाद ( केन्द्रीय ) नियमावली 1957 के नियम 7 के अन्तर्गत यथानिर्धारित उक्त करार की एक प्रति केन्द्र सरकार को भेज दी गई है ;
अतः अव , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 क की उप - धारा ( 3 ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा इसके साथ संलग्न उक्त करार को न्यायमूर्ति श्री के. राममूर्ति ( सेवानिवृत्त ) के सहमति पत्र सहित प्रकाशित करती है और एतद्वारा उक्त औद्योगिक विवाद न्यायमूर्ति श्री के. राममूर्ति ( सेवानिवृत्त ) के विवाचन हेतु संदर्भित है । विवाचक विवाद की जांच - पड़ताल करेगा और स्व- हस्ताक्षरित विवाचन पंचाट समुचित सरकार को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;
और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार इस बात से संतुष्ट है कि करार से संबंधित पक्षकार प्रत्येक पक्ष के बहुमत का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं , केन्द्र सरकार औद्योगिक विवाद (केन्द्रीय ) नियम, 1957 के नियम 8 क के साथ पठित औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 10 क की उप - धारा 3 - क द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए अपनी तरफ से इस अधिसूचना को उन नियोजकों और कामगारों, जो विवाचन करार के पक्षकार तो नहीं हैं लेकिन विवाद से संबंध रखते हैं, की सूचना हेतु प्रकाशित करती है ।
[फा. सं. एल-20025/3/2005- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 10th May , 2005 S.O. 1834. Whereas an industrial dispute exists between the management of Indian Airlines and their workmen represented by All Indian Aircraft Engineers Association and Indian Aircraft Technicians Association ;
And whereas , the said management and their workmen represented by the said Associations have by written agreement under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10A of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) agreed to refer the said dispute to the arbitration of Mr. Justice K. Ramamoorthy (Retd . ) and have forwarded to the Central Government a copy of the said agreement as prescribed under Rule 7 of the I.D. ( Central) Rules , 1957 ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 10A of the said Act the Central Government hereby publishes the said agreement as hereto appended alongwith the letter of consent of Mr. Justice K. Ramamoorthy (Retd. ) and hereby refers the said Industrial Dispute to the arbitration of Mr. Justice K. Ramamoorthy ( Retd. ) . The arbitrator shall investigate the dispute and submit to the appropriate Govt . the arbitration award signed by him;
And whereas the Central Government is satisfied thatthe parties to the agreement represent the majority of each party , the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by sub - section ( 3A) of Section 10A of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) read with Rule 8A of the Industrial Disputes ( Central ) Rules , 1957 , in this behalfpublishes this notification for the information ofthe employers and workmen who are not parties to the Arbitration agreement but are concerned in the dispute .
[F. No. L-20025/3 /2005 - IR( C - I ) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy .
Form-C AGREEMENT
(Under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ) BETWEEN
Name of the Parties:
1. Representing Employer :
1. Shri Anup K. Srivastava , Director(P& IR) Indian Airlines Ltd. , Airlines House , New Delhi .
2. Shri S. C. Gupta , Director (Engineering) Indian Airlines Ltd. , Airlines House , New Delhi . AND
Representing Workmen :
All IndiaAircraft Engineers Association 1 Shri Deepak Sharma ,
President, All India Aircraft Engineers Association 2. Shri Y. V. Raju, General Secretary , All India Aircraft Engineers Association [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Indian Aircraft Technicians Association
1. Shri P. Pompapathi
President, Indian Aircraft Technicians Association 2. Shri Yogesh Kumar, General Secretary ,
Indian Aircraft Technicians Association Short Recital of the case :
Indian Aircraft Technicians Association has been raising the issue of change of designation of their members since November , 1999. This issue was discussed with the representatives of IATA on a number of occasions when it was time and again explained to them that no demand on such an issue can be raised as the same was not a subject matter of discussion with any Union/Association .
IATA has , however , been requesting for favourable consideration on this issue on the plea that their members were technical diploma holders who would normally get the designation of Jr. Engineer in Government services, PSUs etc. and that such a change in designation has long been effected for their counterparts in Air India .
In context of the above , the issue of charige of designation was further discussed on 21st November , 2004 with the President and General Secretary , IATA by the Management and an understanding was arrived at where it was agreed that :
the proposal for change of designation , as given below , would be processed for approval;
PROPOSED EXISTING
Sr. Foreman/ Sr . Inspector
5019
भारत का राजपत्र : मई 14, 2005/वैशाख 24, 1927
Instructions will be issued to effect the change ofdesignation appearing in pay slip of related categories for the month of December, 2004 .
General Secretary , IATA vide reference No. HPDO2 dated 17th December , 2004 was informed that on account of sensitivities emerging from other categories which are likely to have its implication on the industrial relation climate ofthe organisation at a crucial juncture , the implementation of the above proposal was expected to be effected in the pay slips of related categories for the month of January , 2005.
Instructions were issued by General Manager ( F) vide reference No. Fin/Rule/2/52 dated 24-1-2005 informing Director ( IT) of the change of designation of related categories of employees represented by IATA and the same was incorporated in the pay slips for the month of January, 2005.
Itmay be stated herein that the representatives of All India Aircraft Engineers Association were invited for discussions by the management of Indian Airlines on a number of occasions prior to the understanding arrived at with the Indian Aircraft Technicians Association on 21st November , 2004 with a view to find a solution acceptable to all parties but they were not inclined to participate in the discussions . However , they have taken a stand that award of the " Engineer" designation to other categories who do not have the requisite qualifications would be undersirable .
Production Engineer -I/
Inspection Engineer- I
Foreman A'/Inspector ' A' Production Engineer - II/ Inspection Engineer - II Sr. Master Technician/ Inspector
Asstt . Production
Engineer /Asstt . Inspection
Engineer
Master Technician
No Change
Sr. Technician
No Change
Technician
No Change
Consideration for change of designation will remain restricted to the upper most 3 levels of the membership of IATA ;
No enlargement of this consideration will be made at a future date ;
No consequential benefits , monetary or otherwise, related to the designation , will flow by drawing comparison with others similarly placed;
Members of IATA with changed designation will continue to perform same and similar job functions as hitherto ; and
In the introductory meeting held with the representatives of All India Aircraft Engineers Association on 29th/30th January , 2005 , the representatives of the Association expressed their strong reservations over the change of designation in respect of certain categories of Technicians répresented by Indian Aircraft Technicians Association and desired that the decision should be reviewed. The representatives of All India Aircraft Engineers Association further stated that they were prepared to participate in any discussion with the management/ representatives of Indian Aircraft Technicians . Association to find an amicable solution .
It was agreed that a meeting would be organised shortly by the management with the representatives of both All India Aircraft Engineers Association and Indian Aircraft Technicians Association to review the decision taken , with a view to find an amicable solution to all , where:
the Management will be represented by Shri Manet Paes , Dy. Managing Director and Shri T. R. Ramachandran, General Manager (IR);
the All India Aircraft Engineers Association will be represented by Shri Deepak Sharma , President and Shri Y. V. Raju , General Secretary; and 5020
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 14 , 2005 /VAISAKHA 24 , 1927
the Indian Aircraft Technicians Association will be represented by two of their office bearers .
Meetings were held on 3rd and 4th February , 2005 and subsequently on 8th February , 2005 when the management of Indian Airlines was represented by Shri Manet Pacs, Dy . Managing Director and Shri T. R. Ramachandran , General Manager ( IR) ; All India Aircraft Engineers Association was represented by Shri Deepak Sharma , President and Shri Y. V. Raju , General Secretary; Indian Aircraft Technicians Association was represented by Shri P. Pompapathi , President and Shri Yogesh Kumar , General Secretary . Further meetings were held on 2 1st and 22nd February . 2005 and no amicable solution acceptable to all parties emerged .
It is. therefore , hereby agreed between the parties to refer the above dispute to the arbitration of justice K. Ramamoorthy (Retd . ) , D - 17 , G.K. Enclave - I, New Delhi- 110048.
It is also agreed that in the interregnum the changed designations only at the level of Sr. Master Technician/ Inspector would be kept in abeyance till the award of the Arbitrator.
Specific matter in the dispute :
The issue with regard to change of designation in respect of certain catergories of employees represented by IATA as indicated in the recital above .
(i) Details of the parties to the disputes (including the name and address of the establishment or undertakings involved) 1. Indian Airlines Ltd. , Airlines House , 113, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi .
2. All India Aircraft Engineers Association Regd. No. B -539 , Central Office , Indian Airlines Ltd. EngineeringHangar No. 1 , Beguinpet , Hyderabad- 16 .
3. Indian Aircraft Technicians Association , Regd. No. 4927, IATA Office, Terminal No. 1 , IGI Airport , New Delhi - 110037 .
18531 ( ii) Total number of workmen : employed in the Undertaking affected.
3056 (iii) Estimated number of workmen : Affected or likely to be affected .
Wefurther agree that the decision of the Arbitrator shall be binding on us .
The.Arbitrator shall make his award within a period ofthree months or within such further time as is extended by mutual agreement between us in writing . In case the
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] award is not made within the period aforementioned , the reference to arbitration shall stand automatically cancelled and we shall be free to negotiate for fresh arbitration.
On behalf of AIAEA Sd/- On behalf of management Sd/-
1. Shri Anup K. Srivastava , Director(Personnel & IR) Sd/-
1. Shri Deepak Sharma President. Sd/-
2. Shri Y. V. Raju , General Secretary 2. Shri S. C. Gupta, Director(Engincering)
Onbehalf ofIATA
Sd/-
1. Shri P. Pompapathi , President Sd/-
2. Shri Yogesh Kumar, General Secretary Witness :
Sd/-
1. ( Sunder D. Chhabra) Sd/-
2. ( Suneet K. Kauldhar )
JUSTICE K. RAMAMOORTHY
(Retd)
D- 17 , G. K. ENCLAVE - I
NEW DELHI - 110048 Phone : 26241780 51632628
Mobile : 9810529889 9312211864 13th March , 2005 .
My Dear Mr. Suri ,
1 am in receipt of your letter .
I am very happy to give my consent to act as an Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the following parties as per the agreement dated 22-2-2005 :-
1. All India Aircraft Engineers Association 2 . Indian Aircraft Technicians Association 3. Indian Airlines Limited
Yourssincerely, Sd/- (K. RAMAMOORTHY) M/s. Suri &Company, Law Firm
12, Golf Apartments , Sujan Singh Park .
Maharishi Raman Marg ,
New Delhi - 110003 .
Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.