This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. ( N ) 04 /0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन) 04/ 0007/ 2003-05

सत्यमेव भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर 4 दिसम्बर 10 , 2005, शनिवार /अग्रहायण 13-अग्रहायण 19, 1927 सं० 50 ]

No. 501 NEW DELHI , DECEMBER DECEMBER 10, 2005, SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 13 AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग 11-खण्ड ३ -उप-खण्ड (ii ) PART 11- Section 3- Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence )

MINISTRY OF FINANCE वित्त मंत्रालय

(Departmentof Revenue) (राजस्व विभाग )

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) (केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 30th November . 2005 शुद्धिपत्र नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर , 2005

S.O. 4572.-In partial modification of Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue . Government of India . Notification No. 208/2005 dated 4th October, 2005 (F. No. 203/ 75/2004 / ITA.II ) the name of the organization should be read as `M/ s . Central India Institute ofMedical Sciences ' instead of M/ s Central Indian Institute of Medical Science ' .

का. आ. 4572.- भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग की अधिसूचना सं . 208/2005 दिनांक 4 अक्तूबर, 2005 (फा. सं. 203/75/2004/आ. क.नि.-II ) में आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए संगठन के नाम को ' मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडियन इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल सांइसेज़ के स्थान पर ' मैसर्स सेंट्रल इंडिया इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल सांइसेज़ ' पढ़ा जाए ।

[Notification No. 255/ 2005 /F.No. 203-75-2004 - ITA - 111 [अधिसूचना सं. 255/2005/फा. सं. 203/75/2004- आ.क.नि.- II]

NIDHI SINGH . Under Secy.

निधिसिंह, अवर सचिव

(13307)

3423G1/2005 13308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर, 2005 (आयकर)

Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of Sub -section (1) of Section 35 of the Income Tax Act , 1961 , read with Rule6 ofthe Income Tax Rules , 1962 for the period from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 under the category ' University, College or other Institution ' partly engaged in research activities ( and not as a scientific research association existing solely for research) subject to the following conditions:-

(i ) The approved organization shall maintain separate accounts for its research activities .

+ का. आं. 4573.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962के नियम 6 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ ' विश्वविद्यालय , महाविद्यालय अथवा अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 1-4-2003 से दिनांक 31-3-2006 तक की अवधि के लिए संगठन मैसर्स काउंसिल ऑफ साइंटिफिक एण्ड इण्डस्ट्रियल रिसर्च , 2 रफी मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110001 , जो अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों में कार्यरत है, ( और न कि अनुसंधान के लिए एक मात्र मौजूद ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ ' के रूप में है ) , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित किया गया है :-

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने अनुसंधान कार्य- कलापों के लिए अलग खाते रखेगा ।

(ii) For each of the financial years for which this approval is being given , the approved organization shall submit a copy of its audited Income and Expenditure account in respect of the research activities for which it has been approved under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of I.T. Act , 1961 to the Commissioner of Income Tax/Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) having jurisdiction, on or before the due date of filing of return ofincome or within 90 days from the date ofthis notification, whichever expires later .

(iii ) The approved organization shall also enclose with the Income and Expenditure account referred to in paragraph (ii ) above, a certificate from the auditor:-

(a) specifying the amount received by the organization for scientific research/ statistical research in respect of which the donors are eligible to claim deduction under clause ( ii ) ofsub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 .

( ii ) वित्तीय वर्षों के प्रत्येक वर्ष के लिए जिसके लिए यह अनुमोदन प्रदान किया जा रहा है, अनुमोदित संगठन अनुसंधान कार्य-कलापों के संबंध में लेखा परीक्षित आम एंव व्यय खाते की एक प्रति इसके क्षेत्राधिकार वाले आयकर आयुक्त/आयकर निदेशक ( छूट ) को आय कर विवरणी दाखिल करने की नियत तारीख को अथवा उससे पहले अथवा इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 90 दिनों के अन्दर, जो भी बाद में समाप्त हो, प्रस्तुत करेगा, जिसके लिए इसे आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अनुमोदन प्रदान किया गया है ।

(b) certifying that the expenditure incurred was for research in social science/ statistical research.

( iii ) यह संगठन उपर्युक्त पैरा ( ii ) में सदंर्भित आय एवं व्यय खाते के साथ लेखा परीक्षक से प्राप्त एक प्रमाण पत्र भी संलग्न करेगाः-

[Notification No. 254/2005 /F. No. 203 /23 /2004 - ITA- II ] NIDHI SINGH, Under Secy.

( आथिक कार्य विभाग )

(बीमा प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली 30 नवम्बर, 2005 (क) जिसमें संगठन द्वारा वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान/सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त की गई उस राशि का उल्लेख किया गया हो, जिसके लिए दानकर्ता धारा 35 (1 ) ( ii ) के अन्तर्गत कटौती का दावा करने के लिए पात्र हैं ।

(ख) जिसमें यह प्रमाणित किया गया हो कि किया गया व्यय सामाजिक विज्ञान/ सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए हीं था ।

का. आ. 4574 बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण अधिनियम, 1999 ( 1999 का 41 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा आगामी आदेशों तक श्री अशोक चावला, अपर सचिव ( आर्थिक कार्य ) को बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण ( आईआरडीए ) में अंश कालिक सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 254/2005/फा. सं. 203/23/2004-आयकर नि.- II.] निधि सिंह, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 30th November , 2005

[फा. सं. 11/6/2003- बीमा- IV] ललित कुमार, उप सचिव (INCOME TAX)

(Department of Economic Affairs) (INSURANCE DIVISION)

New Delhi , the 30th November , 2005

S.O. 4574. In excercise of the powers conferred by section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development S.O. 4573. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization M/ s . Counsel of Scientific and Industrial Research , 2 , Rafi Marg , New Delhi - 110001 has been approved by the Central 13309 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , 2nd December, 2005 Authority Act. 1999 (41 of 1999) , the Central Government hereby appoint Shri Ashok Chawla , Additional Secretary (EA) as Part -time Member of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority ( IRDA) with immediate effect until further orders .

[F. No. 11 /6/2003 - Ins- IV] LALIT KUMAR, Dy. Secy.

(बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर, 2005

S.O. 4576 -In excercise of the powers conferred by clause ( c) of Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act, 1981 (61 of 1981 ) , the Central Government , in consultation with Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Smt. Usha Thorat , Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India as part -time director on the Board of Directors of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development in Place of Shri V. Leeladhar, Deputy Governor, from November, 21 , 2005 and until further orders .

[F. No. 7/4/2004 -BO - 1 } G.B. SINGH , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर , 2005 का. आ. 4575.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककांरी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970/ 1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 (च ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा डॉ. के. अंजनप्पा , निवासी श्री साई निलयम , प्लाट 11 , फेस 3 , कमलापुरी कालोनी, हैदराबाद -500073 को अधिसूचना जारी होने की तारीख से, तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा उनका उत्तराधिकारी नामित होने तक जो भी पहले हो, आन्ध्रा बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंश- कालिक गैर-सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

का. आ. 4577.- राष्ट्रीय बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ), स्कीम, 1970 के खंड 3 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा श्री ए. के. खौंड, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, शहरी बैंक विभाग , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, मुम्बई को तत्काल प्रभाव से अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक श्री वी. एस. दास के स्थान पर बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है । [फा. सं. 9/45/2005- बीओ- I ] जी. बी. सिंह, अवर सचिव

[फा. सं. 9/18/2000 - बीओ -1 ]

जी. बी. सिंह, अवर सचिव (BANKING DIVISION) New Delhi , the 30th November , 2005

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S. O. 4577. In excercise of the powers conferred by Clause (c) of Sub- section 3 of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970, read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellancous Provisions ) Scheme, 1970 the Central Government hereby nominates Shri A. K. Khound , Chief General Manager, Urban Banks Department, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office , Mumbai as Director of Bank of India Vice Shri V. S. Das , with immediate effect and until further orders .

S.O. 4575.--In excercise of the powers conferred by sub -section 3 ( h) and ( 3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Dr. K. Anjanappa, resident of Sri Sai Nilayam, Plot 11 , Phase 3 , Kamalapuri Colony , Hyderabad-500073 ,as part-time non - official director on the Board of Andhra Bank for a period of three years from the date of notification or until his successor is nominated , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/18/2000 -BO - I ] G. B. SINGH , Under Secy.

[F. No. 9/45 /2005 --BO- I ] G.B. SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर , 2005

विदेश मंत्रालय (सी.पी. वी. प्रभाग )

का. आ. 4576. - राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4578.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के अंक (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास, खारतूम में श्री संजय दत्ता, सहायक को 23-11-2005 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है । अधिनियम, 1981 ( 1981 का 61 ) की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से एतद्वारा श्रीमती उषा थोराट, डिप्टी गवर्नर, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक को 21 नवम्बर, 2005 से और अगले आदेश होने तक श्री वी. लीलाधर, डिप्टी गवर्नर के स्थान पर राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालिक निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[सं. टी-4330/01/2005/

एस. एन. वी. रामन्ना राव , अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) [फा. सं. 7/4/2004- बीओ-1 ] जी. बी. सिंह, अवर सचिव 13310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

(C. P. V. DIVISION)

अनुसूची

New Delhi , 23rd November, 2005

संशोधन की संख्या

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय

संशोधन लागू

और तिथि

होने की तिथि

सं, मानक की संख्या

और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1. आई एस 1943: 1995

S.O. 4578.- In pursuance of the Clause ( a ) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act , 1948 (41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri Sanjay Datta , Assistant in the Embassy of India , Khartoum to perform the duties of Assistant Consular, Officer with effect from 23-11-2005.

संशोधन संख्या 5 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

2. आई एस 2580: 1995 संशोधन संख्या 1 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

[No.Τ. - 4330/01/ 2005 ] . S. N. V. RAMANA RAO , Under Secy. ( Cons . )

3. आई एस 2874 : 1993 संशोधन संख्या 1 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

4. आई एस 3667: 1993 संशोधन संख्या 1 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

5. आई एस 3751 : 1993 संशोधन संख्या 1 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005 का. अ . 4579.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के अंक (क ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास, सान फ्राँसिसको में श्री एन. भट्टाचार्य , सहायक को 23-11-2005 से सहायक कौसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

6. आई एस 3790: 1991 संशोधन संख्या 2 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

7. आई एस 7406 ( 1 ) : संशोधन संख्या 2 30 नवम्बर, 2005 1984 अक्तूबर, 2005

[सं . टी-4330/01 /2005] एस. एन. वी. रामन्ना राव, अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) New Delhi , 23rd November, 2005

8. आई एस 8117: 1976 संशोधन संख्या 4 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

9. आई एस 12001 : 1987 संशोधन संख्या 1 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

10. आई एस 12174 : 1987 संशोधन संख्या 1 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005 S. O. 4579 ..- In pursuance of the Clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri N. Bhattacharya, Assistant in the Consulate General of India , San Francisco to perform the duties of Assistant Consular. Officer with effect from 23-11-2005 .

11. आई एस 12493 : 1988 संशोधन संख्या 2 30 नवम्बर , 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005

[No. T. -4330/01 /2005 ] S. N. V. RAMANA RAO , Under Secy. (Cons. )

12. आई एस 13649: 1993 संशोधन संख्या 2 30 नवम्बर, 2005 अक्तूबर, 2005 उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

( भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली 25 , नवम्बर, 2005

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[र्स. टी एक्स डी/जी-25|

एम.एस. वर्मा, निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी) का. आ.4580.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये 13311 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम्बर, 2005

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs ) (BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi, the 25th November, 2005

का. आ.4581.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

और तिथि

S. O. 4580.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule(1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय सं. मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

SCHEDULE

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

No. and year of the amendment

1 दिसम्बर, 2005

1. 14616 1999 1. जून, 2005

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

Sl . No. and year No. of the Indian Standards

2. 15476 2004

31 अक्टूबर, 2005 2

1.अक्तूबर, 2005

1. IS 1943 : 1995

5 30 November, 2005

Amendment No. October, 2005

2. IS 2580 : 1995

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 October, 2005

3. IS 2874: 1993

1 30 November, 2005

Amendment No. October, 2005

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मानक भवन 9, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

4. IS 3667 : 1993

1 30 November, 2005

Amendment No. October, 2005

[संदर्भ सीईडी/राजपत्र] 5. IS 3751 : 1993

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 October, 2005

जगदीश चन्द्र अरोड़ा, निदेशक एवं प्रमुख

(सिविल इंजीनियरी ) .

6. IS 3790 : 1991

30 November , 2005

Amendment No. 2 October, 2005

New Delhi , the 25th November, 2005

30 November. 2005

7. IS 7406( 1 ) : 1984

Amendment No. 2 October, 2005

8. IS 8117 : 1976

30 November, 2005:

Amendment No. 4 October, 2005

9. IS 12001 : 1987

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 October, 2005

S. O. 4581. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

10. IS 12174: 1987

SCHEDULE

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 October, 2005

11. IS 12493: 1988

30 November. 2005

No. and year of the amendment

Amendment No. 2 October, 2005

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

Sl. No. and year No. the of Indian Standards

12. IS 13649 : 1993

30 November , 2005

Amendment No. 2 "October, 2005

1 2

1 December . 2005

1 June , 2005

1. 14616: 1999

31 October , 2005

2. 15476: 2004 1October, 2005

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad . Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref.: TXD/G- 25 ]

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh . Chennai . Mumbai and also Branch Offices Ahmedabad. Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar. Coimbatore .

M.S. VERMA, Director & Head (Textiles ) 13312

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

SCHEDULE

Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

No. and year of Indian Standards , [Ref.: CED/Gazette]

Date of Establis- hed J.C. ARORA, Director & Head ( Civil Engg. )

Sl . No. and year and No. title of the Indian Standards Established

ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2005

None September, 2005 का. आ. 4582- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के षिवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

I. IS 3708 ( Part 5) : 2005 Methods of test for natural rubber latex Part 5 Determination of KOH Number ( Second Revision)

अनुसूची

None

नये भारतीय मानक स्थापित तिथि

August. 2005 द्वारा अतिक्रमित

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानकों सं. की संख्या , वर्षी और

भारतीय मानक

शीर्षक

अथवामानकों,

2. IS 11720 ( Part 2) : 2005 Methods of test for synthetic rubber Part 2 Measurement of vulcanization character- istics with the oscillating disc curemeter ( First Revision )

यदि कोई हो,

कीसंख्या और वर्ष

कुछ नहीं सितम्बर, 2005

1. आई एस 3708 ( भाग 5 ):

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan . 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata. Chandigarh , Chennai . Mumbai and also Branch Offices Ahmedabad . Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore. Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna . Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

2005 प्राकृतिक रबड़ लेटैक्स की परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 5 के.ओ.एच. संख्या ज्ञात करना (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

अगस्त, 2005

कुछ नहीं

[ Ref. PCD/G - 7 ( Gazette ) ) D. K. CHAUDHURY , Sc . ' F ' and Head ( PCD) नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2005

2. आई एस 11720 ( भाग 2): 2005 सिंथेटिक रबड़ की परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ भाग 2 दोलन क्योरमीटर से वल्कनीकरण लक्षणों का मापन (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

का. आ. 4383 भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (को ) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक सं. की संख्या और वर्ष

1 2

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

23 नवम्बर , 2005

2मई, 2005

1. आईएस 15328: 2003

[संदर्भ: पीसीडी/जी-7 ( राजपत्र ) ] डी. के . चौधरी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( पीसीडी) New Delhi , the Ist December, 2005

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मानक भवन 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र| जे.सी. अरोड़ा, वैज्ञानिक' ई ' व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियर ) S. O. 4582.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule (I) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on thedate indicated against each:

13313 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi, 1st December, 2005

S. O. 4583.-In pursuance of the clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. and year of the Indian

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

No. Standards

23 Nov. , 2005

2May, 2005

1. IS 15328:2003

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune. Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. No. CED/Gazette]

J. C. ARORA, Sc. ' E' & Head (Civil Engg. )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4584.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम, 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया हैः-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

30सितम्बर, 2005 1.

13465 (भाग 2 ): 2005 विधुतरोधन के लिए

प्रयुक्त रेजिन आधारित अभिक्रियाशील यौगिक- भाग 2

परीक्षण पद्वतियाँ ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ ईटी 02/टी-133 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञानिक' एफ' एवं प्रमुख (विद्युत तकनीकी)

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S.O. 4584. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

Sl . No.

Date of Established

No. & Year of the Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

30 September, 2005 1. IS13465 (Part 2): 2005, Resin based reactive compounds used for electrical insulation Part 2 : Methods of test (FirstRevision) 13314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Mahak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna . Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. No. ET (02/T- 133 ]

P.K. MUKHERJEE , SC . ' F ' & Head (Elec . Technical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4585.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है वह स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

क्रमसंख्या

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

4 1.

आई एस 15557 : 2005

आई एस 3225: 1965 बफर विलयन तैयार करने

31मार्च , 2005 बफर विलयन तैयार करने की पद्धतियाँ

की पद्धतियाँ और आई एस 5741 : 1970

तथा pH ज्ञात करने की पद्धतियाँ

pHज्ञात करने की पद्धतियाँ

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली 110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ सीएचडी 1 / आई एस 15557 ]

डॉ.यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव, वैज्ञानिक' ई, ' निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S.O. 4585.- In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Dateof

No. & Year of the Indian Standards,

No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

Established

ifany, Superseded by the

New Indian Standard

4 1. IS 15557 : 2005 Methods for

31 March , 2005

IS 3225 : 1965 Methods for Preparation

ofBuffer Solutions and IS 5741 : 1970

preparation of Buffer Solutions and Methods for Determination ofpH

Methods for Determination ofpH

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. CHD 1 /IS: 15557 ]

Dr. U.C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist - ' E ' , Director & Head ( Chemical)

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4586 भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वह स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

13315

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

क्रम संख्या स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(1)

1 आई एस 3025 ( भाग 57 ) : 2005 जल एवं अपशिष्ट जल के नमूने लेना और परीक्षण (भौतिक एवं रसायनिक ) की विधियाँ ( भाग 57 ) बोरान ( पहला पुनरीक्षण) अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4) (3)

30 सितम्बर, 2005 इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 32/आई एस 3025 ( भाग 57 ) ] डा. यू.सी. श्रीवास्तव, वैज्ञानिक' ई', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S.O. 4586.In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

Sl . No. No.& Year of the Indian Standards Established

(2)

(1)

1. IS 3025 (Part 57 ) : 2005 Methods of Sampling and test (Physical and Chemical ) for water and wastewater part57 Boron (First Revision) SCHEDULE

Date of Established No.& Year ofthe Indian Standards, if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4) (3)

30 September , 2005 Copyof this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna . Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 32/IS 3025 (Part 57) ] Dr. U.C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E' , Director & Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली , 5 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4587.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं:

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संख्या

(2)

(1)

1. आई एस 10208 : 1982 हीरक कोर वेधक उपस्कर - विशिष्टि

3423 G1/05-2

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

(4) (3)

1 नवम्बर 2005 संशोधन न. 2 , अक्टूबर 2005 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13316

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवमन्तापुरभ में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. एम.ई.डी./जी- 2 : 1 ]

सी.के. वेदा, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजीनियरिंग )

New Delhi , the 5th December, 2005

S.O. 4587.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the amendment

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

Sl .No.

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1November 2005

Amendment No. 2, October 2005

IS 10208: 1982 Specification for diamond core drilling equipment

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna . Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. MED/G-2: 1 ]

C.K. VEDA, Scientist ' F ' and Head (Mechnical Engineering )

नई दिल्ली, 5 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4588.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31 अगस्त 2005 1 आईएस 9170 ( भाग 1 ): 2005 सिरारहित ढुलाई रोप

क्लिप-विशिष्टि भाग 1 सामान्य अपेक्षाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

31अगस्त 2005 2 आईएस 9170 ( भाग 3 ): 2005 सिरारहित ढुलाई रोप क्लिप-विशिष्टि: भाग 3 लेशिंग चेन

31 अगस्त 2005 3 आईएस 14387: 2005 वाल्टस- वायु संवातक- विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30सितम्बर 2005 4 आईएस 11710 ( भाग 1 ) : 2005 हीरक कोड बंधन के चयन और डिजाइन की रीति संहिता भाग 1 याँत्रिक चालन ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

30 सितम्बर 2005 5 आईएस 11710 ( भाग 2 ): 2005 हीरक कोड वेंधन के चयन और डिजाइन की रीति संहिता भाग 2 शीर्ष द्रव चालित ( पहला पुनरीक्षण ) 13317 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गवाहटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. एम.ई.डी./जी-2: 1 ]

सी.के. वेदा , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजीनियरिंग )

New Delhi , the 5th December, 2005

S.O. 4588. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Date of Established No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards . if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31 August 2005 1 IS 9170 (Part 1 ) : 2005 Endless haulage clips-Specification Part 1 General Requirements (first revision)

31 August 2005 2 IS9170 (Part 1 ): 2005 Endless haulage clips-Specification (Part 3 Lashing chain)

31 July 2005 3 IS 14387 : 2005 Vaults-Air ventilators- Specification (first revision)

30 September 2005 4 IS 11710 (Part 1 ) : 2005 Selection and design ofdiamond core drills-Code of Practice Part 1 Mechanical Drive (first revision)

30 September 2005 5 IS 11710 (Part 2) : 2005 Selection and design ofdiamond core drills- Code of Practice Part 2 Top drive hydraulic (firstrevision)

Copy ofthese Standard are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards. Manak Bhavan . 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi . Kolkata . Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal . Bhubaneshwar. Coimbatore. Guwahati, Hyderabad. Jaipur. Kanpur. Nagpur, Patna, Pune . Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. MED/G-2: 11

Dr. C.K. VEDA. Scientist ' F ' & Head ( Mechnical Engineering)

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4589- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागूहोने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30सितम्बर, 2005

संशोधन संख्या न. 1 , सितम्बर , 2005

1 आई एस 3144 : 1992 खनिज उर्ण ताप ऊष्मारोधी सामग्री- परीक्षण पद्धति ( द्वितीय पुनरीक्षण ) 13318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणें तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 27/ आई एस-3144]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन ) New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S. O. 4589.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 . theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. Noland year of the Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4) (2)

(1)

30 September, 2005

Amendment No. I September, 2005

1 IS 3144 : 1992 Mineral Wool Thermal insulatin Materials -Method of test (Second Revision )

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan . 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad . Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna . Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. CHD 27 /IS - 31441

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA . Scientist ' E ' , Director and Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आं. 4590.- भारतीय मानक बयूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया / किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(3)

(2)

(1)

(4) 30 सितम्बर, 2005

संशोधन संख्या नं . 1 , सितम्बर , 2005

आई एस 9235 : 1979 भौतिक विश्लेषण की पद्धति तथा ठोस अपशिष्ट में नमी ज्ञात करना (औद्योगिक ठोस अपशिष्ट को छोड़ कर )

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर भार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ सं . सीएचडी 32 / आई ए - 9235 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव, वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S. O.4590.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987 . the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

13319

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. No. and year of the Indian Standards

(2)

(1)

1 IS 9235: 1979 Method for Physical analysis and determination of moisture insolid wastes ( excluding industrial solid wastes)

Date from which the amendment shall have effec!

(4)

(3)

30 September, 2005

Amendment No. 1 September, 2005

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna. Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 32/1-9235 ]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA , Scientist ' E' , Director and Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4591.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(1)

1 आई एस 1106: 1986 आसुत जल के लिए कांच की बोतलों की विशिष्टि ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण)

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

(4)

(3)

30 नवम्बर, 2005 संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर, 2005

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी10/टी-1106 ] डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव, वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' , निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December , 2005

S. O. 4591. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , Particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

Sl . No. No. and title of the Indian Standards

(2)

(1)

1 IS 1106 : 1986 Specification for distilled water glass bottles (first revision)

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. I November , 2005

Copy to these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh. Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati . Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur. Nagpur. Patna, Pune . Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 10/T 11061]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA , Scientist ' E' , Director and Head ( Chemical ) 13320

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4592.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1

30नवम्बर, 2005

संशोधन की संख्या 1 नवम्बर, 2005

आई एस 1107 : 1986 वातित जल के लिए क्राउन फिनिश टाइप कांच की बोतलें ( द्वितीय पुनरीक्षण )

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/टी-1107 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' , निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन)

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S.O.4592.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No. and title of the Indian Standards No. and year ofthe amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1

30November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 , November , 2005

IS 1107 : 1986 Specification for aerated water glass bottles crown finish type (firstrevision)

Copyto these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 10/T - 1107 ]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E' , Director and Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4593.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1

संशोधन की संख्या 1 नवम्बर, 2005

30 नवम्बर , 2005 आई एस 1392: 1999 दूध के लिए कांच की बोतलें (चौथा पुनरीक्षण ) 13321 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली 110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/टी-1392 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' , निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन)

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S.O. 4593. In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987. theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, Particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year ofthe amendment

Sl . No. No. and title of the Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 , November, 2005

1 IS 1392 : 1999 Glass milk bottles- Specification (fourth revision )

Copyto these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also BranchOffices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patra, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. CHD 10/T - 1392 ]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E ' , Director and Head (Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4594.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30नवम्बर, 2005 1 आई एस 1662: 1974 शराब हेतु कांच की बोतलों की संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर, 2005 विशिष्टि( द्वितीय पुनरीक्षण )

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/टी-1662 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन)

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S.O. 4594. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules. 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards . Particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

13322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii )]

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No. and title of the Indian Standards No. and year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 , November, 2005

IS 1662 : 1974 Specification for glass liquor bottles ( second revision)

Copy to these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore . Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 10/T- 16621

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E ' , Director and Head (Chemical)

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4595.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया / किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर , 2005

30 नवम्बर, 2005 आई एस 2091 : 1983 बीयर हेतु कांच की मल्टी ट्रिप बोतलों की विशिष्टि ( द्वितीय पुनरीक्षण )

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्धहैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/टी -20911

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव, वैज्ञानिक' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December , 2005

S.O. 4595. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of Burcau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards . Particulars of which given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No , and title of the Indian Standards No. and year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) I

30 November, 2005 IS 2091 : 1983 Specification for multi - trip Amendment No. 1 , November, 2005 glass beer bottles ( second revision )

Copy to these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan . 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar. Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur. Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune. Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 10/T - 20911

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA , Scientist 'E ' . Director and Head ( Chemical ) 13323 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4596.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया / किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (2)

(3)

(4) (1)

30नवम्बर , 2005

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर , 2005

आई एस 5168 : 1969 दूध पिलाने हेतु कांच कीफीडिंग बोतलों की विशिष्टि

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/टी -5168 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S. O. 4596.- In pursuance ofclause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule (7 ) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987. theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. No. and year of the Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 , November, 2005

IS 5168 : 1969 Specification for glass feeding bottles

Copy to these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan . 9. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh . Chennai . Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 10/T -5168 | Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E' , Director and Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4597.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया / किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर, 2005 30नवम्बर, 2005 आई एस 9780 : 1992 टमाटर केचअप के लिए कांच की बोतलों की विशिष्टि ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण )

3423 G1/05-3 [PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 13324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , वण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/टी 9780 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव, वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन ) New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S. O. 4597.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 . theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, Particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

No. and year of the Indian Standards

Sl . No.

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30November , 2005

Amendment No. I , November , 2005

1 IS9780 : 1992 Glass bottles for tomato ketchup-Specification . ( first revision )

Copy to these Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur . Patna, Pune. Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. CHD 10/T- 9780 ]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E ' , Director and Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4598.- भारतीय मानक बयूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया / किये गये हैं:

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30नवम्बर , 2005

संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर, 2005

1 आई एस 11984: 1986 मुक्त प्रवाही द्रव के लिए कांच की बोतलों की विशिष्टि

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, १ बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/आई एस -11984 ]

डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2005

S. O. 4598.-In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards . Particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

13325

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No. No. and title of the Indian Standards

(2)

(1)

1 IS 11984 : 1986 Specification for glass bottles for free flowing liquids

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

30 November , 2005

Amendment No. 1 , November, 2005

Copy to these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan . 9. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur. Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. CHD 10 /IS- 11984 ]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E ' , Director and Head (Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4599.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संख्या

(2)

(1)

1 आई एस 11985 : 1987 अचार के लिए कांच केजार की विशिष्टि

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

(4)

(3)

30नवम्बर, 2005 संशोधन की संख्या 1 , नवम्बर, 2005

इस संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[सं. सीएचडी 10/आई एस-11985 ] डॉ. यू. सी. श्रीवास्तव , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ', निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 2nd December, 2005

S. O. 4599.-In pursuance ofclause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , Particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

No. and title of the Indian Standards Sl . No.

(2)

(1)

1 IS 11985: 1987 Specification for glass jarsfor pickles

SCHEDULE

No.and year ofthe amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

30 November, 2005

Amendment No. 1 , November , 2005

Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[No. CHD 10/IS- 11985 ]

Dr. U. C. SRIVASTAVA, Scientist ' E' , Director and Head ( Chemical ) [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )| THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13326

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर 2005

का.आ. 4600.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स निर्मल इन्डस्ट्रीज , गली सं. 19, रानी बाजार, बीकानेर, राजस्थान द्वारा निर्मित उच्च ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्टिव " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /05 / 247 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिरा प्लेट के मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उसे खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल कि अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई." मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-24 ( 243 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13327 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 19th October, 2005

S.O. 4600. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections ( 7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the non - automatic (Table top type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AT " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "ACTIVE" ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Nirmal Industries , Gali No. 19 , Rani Bazar. Bikaner, Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/ 05/247:

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (c ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternate current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of i mg to 50 mg and with verification scalc interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' valuc of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k. where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 243 )/20041

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC. 3 (її) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13328

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2005

का.आ. 4601.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स निर्मल इन्डस्ट्रीज, गली सं. 19 , रानी बाजार, बीकानेर, राजस्थान द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्टिव " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 05 / 248 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और किन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में मापमान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा . से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10,5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।.

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 243 ) /2004|

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 13329 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 19th October , 2005

S.O. 4601. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " AP " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - 111 ) and with brand name " ACTIVE " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Nirmal Industries , Gali No. 19. Rani Bazar, Bikaner , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/248 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts. 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices..

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10k, or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (243 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 13330

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4602.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इकनोमी ग्रुप 7 , साईकृपा अपार्टमेंट्स , उत्तम नगर, वाटर टैंक के निकट, मनिनगर, अहमदाबाद-380008 , गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थत वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एम ए टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मार्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 / 586 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार लोड सेल का आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री , से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50मि.ग्रा. तक' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन माापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और' ई ' मान 1x 10 %*, 2X 10 या 5x 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 316)/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13331 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi . the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4602. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type ) with digital indication of "MAT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " MARVEL" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Economy Group. 7, Saikrupa Apartments , Near Uttamnagar Water Tank , Maninager Ahmedabad - 380 008 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 05 / 586;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - Automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 10 kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is Ig. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powersowers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k. where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 316) /2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1/05-4 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19. 1927

13332

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4603.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स देशमुख इंडस्ट्रीज , भोसले पागारिया काम्पलैक्स ( दिलासा पैलेस ) आदिनाथ नगर, गव्हने बस्ति भोसारी , 411039 द्वारा विनिर्मित अंकक सूचन संहित स्वतः सूचक स्वचालित ( भरण मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डी आई डब्ल्यू एफ ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2003 / 220 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी। और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेल प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अकंक सूचक सहित स्वचालित ( भरण मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1 कि ग्रा. और न्यूनतम सहित 0.5 ग्राम है । यह एक मिनट में अधिकतम में अधितकतम 20 पैकेट भरती है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इसका प्रयोग सहज वाले प्रवाह उत्पाद जैसे बिस्कुट, दालें, चिप्स, अनाज, मसाले चायपत्ती , चीनी चावल बीज - मिष्ठान इत्यादि के भरने के लिए किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन की भरण मशीनें भी होंगी जो 2 ग्रा . से 5 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाली हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 46)/2002 | पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13333

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4603. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic filling machine with digital indication (herein referred to as the said Model ) and with brand name " DI - WF " , manufactured byM/ s . Deshmukh Industries Bhosale Pagaria Complex (Dilasa Palace ) , Adinath Nagar, Gavhane Vasti Bhosari , Pune- 411039 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2003/220;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic filling machine with digital indication of maximum capacity 1kg . The value of smallest measurement division is 0.5g. Its output is 20 fills per minute . It operates on 230V and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply. It is used for filling the free flowing products such as biscuits . pluses, chips , grains , spices , tea , sugar, rice , seeds , confectionary etc.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 46)/ 2002 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 13334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4604.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तुला डिजीटल ( इण्डिया ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड ए -12 , नारायणा इन्डस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेस- I , नई दिल्ली-110028 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " टी डी जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्विफ्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005/ 953 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है।

1000

उक्तमॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रोमेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेशेशन सिद्धान्त पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3100 ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । वेक्यूम फ्लोरेशेन्ट डिस्पले ( वी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और कैन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल केअनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिकके ' ई ' मान के लिए 50,000 और उससे अधिक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 % या 5 × 10 % के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है । 1

{फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (331 )/2004 )

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13335 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4604. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " TDJ " series of special accuracy (accuracy class - I ) and with brand name " SWIFT " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Tula Digital (India) Private Limited, A-12, Naraina Industrial Area , Phase- I , New Delhi - 110028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/2005/953;

000

The said Model is a electromagnetic force compensation principle based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 3100g and minimum capacity of 1g. The verfication scale interval ( e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The vaccum flourecent display (VED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volt, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 and above for ' e' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (331 )/2004]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 13336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19. 1927

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4605.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स तुला डिजिटल ( इण्डिया ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड ए -12, नारायणा इन्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , फेस -1, नई दिल्ली -110028 द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " टी डी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसक ब्रांड का नाम " स्विफ्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 / 419 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तं मॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 ' या 5 × 10 के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 331 )/ 2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13337 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November. 2005

S.O. 4605. - Whereas the Central Government . after considering the report submittedto it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " TDT " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "SWIFT " ( herein referred to as said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Tula Digital ( India ) Private Limited. A- 12, Naraina Industrial Area . Phase - I , New Delhi - 110028 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 0920/05/419 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verfication scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volt , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate. sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar makc.accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50.000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (331 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13338

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4606.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स डिजीटल स्केल, 18, चिरंजीवी काम्पलेक्स, महालक्ष्मी पांच रास्ता के पास, पलाडी, अहमदाबाद -380007 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " डिजीटल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डिजीटल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 360 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

PREMIUM COUNTER SCALE

उक्तमॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन पंरिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन कि इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा . तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए $ 000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (69)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13339 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4606. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " Digital " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name " Digital " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s. Digital Scale , 18 , Chiranjivi Complex , Near Mahalaxmi Panch Rasta , Paladi , Ahmedabad - 380 007. Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 2004/360;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 22kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verfication scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2.× 10 or 5x . 11) where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (69 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1/ 05-5 PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19. 1927

13340

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ 4607.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स डिजीटल स्केल , 18 , चिरंजीवी काम्पलेक्स , महालक्ष्मी पांच रास्ता के पास, पलाडी, अहमदाबाद-380007 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डिजीटल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम 'डिजीटल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/361 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडलके अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान (एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10%, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 69)/2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13341

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4607. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " Digital " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - 111 ) and with brand name " Digital " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Digital Scale , 18 , Chiranjivi Complex , Near Mahalaxmi Panch Rasta , Paladi , Ahmedabad- 380 007. Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2004/361:

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 500kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verfication scale interval ( c ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tarc effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5t)kg and upto 1000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k . 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

IF. No. WM - 21 (69)/2003 |

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 13342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) )

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4608.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जैसमीन इण्डस्ट्रीज, एफ-5, अमी अखण्डानन्द, सी टी एम हाइवे, अमराइवाडी, अहमदाबाद-26 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II) वाले " जे आई- II- टी 22 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जैसमीन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005 / 931 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 किलो ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति हैजिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

JAGMIN

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उसे खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल कि अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री , से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 38 )/2002]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13343 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4608.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the non -automatic Weighing Instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of" JI - II - T22 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " JASMIN" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Jasmin Industries, F- 5, Ami Akhandanand, CTM Highway, Amraiwadi , Ahmedabad-26 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/ 931;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 22kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , K being the positive or négative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (38 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13344

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4609.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जैसमीन इण्डस्ट्रीज, एफ -5, अमी अखण्डानन्द, सी टी एम हाइवे , अमराइवाडी, अहमदाबाद -26 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जे आई- II- पी 550 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जैसमीन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/932 'समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 550 किलो ग्राम है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 किलो ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यषकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उसे खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते. हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम सेअधिक और 1000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 38 )/2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13345 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4609. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with digital indication of series " JI - II -P 550 " of high accuracy ( Accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " JASMIN " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Jasmin Industries , F- 5 , Ami Akhandanand, CTM Highway, Amraiwadi , Ahmedabad -26 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2005/932;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 550kg and minimum capacity of 2.5kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity ranging above 50kg. to 1000kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacaturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (38 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 13346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) |

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4610. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्षित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल येथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिवा मेटल टैक लिमिटेड, त्रिलोकपुर रोड़, खेड़ी गांव, कला अम्ब, जिला सिरमौर, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित प्लास्टिक माप फीते के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फ्रीडम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/850 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल प्लास्टिक का माप फीता है । इसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 30 मीटर और सबसे छोटी इकाई 1 मि. मि. और यथार्थता वर्ग- III है । फीते की चौड़ाई 15.05 मि.मी. , मोटाई 0.35 मि.मी. और अंशांकन की मोटाई 1 मि. मी. है ।

FREEDOT

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के माप उपकरण भी शामिल होंगे जिनकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 0.5 मी. , 1 मी. , 1.5 मी. , 2 मी. , 3 मी. , 4 मी. या 5 मी. के गुणजों में होगी ।

[फा..सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 171 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 13347 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November . 2005

S.O. 4610. Whcreas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Plastic Tape Measure of brand name " FREEDOM" ( hercin referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s Shiva Metaltech Ltd. Trilokpur Road, Village Kheri . Kala Anıb . Distrist Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /05/850;

The said model is a Plastic Tape Measures of maxinnım length 30m and smallest division Icm and of accuracy class - 111. The width of the tape is 15.05mm. thickness is 0.35mm and the thickness of graduation is Imm .

FREEDOT

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 171 )/210104 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1 /05-6 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13348

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4611.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिवा मेटल टैक लिमिटेड, त्रिलोकपुर रोड, खेड़ी गांव, काला अम्ब , जिला सिरमौर, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित स्टील माप फीते के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फ्रीडम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 849 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्टील माप फीता है । इसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 100 मीटर और सबसे छोटी इकाई 1 मि. मि. और यथार्थता वर्ग- III. है । फीते कीचौड़ाई 13 मि.मि. मोटाई 0.23 मि.मी. अंशांकन की मोटाई 0.40 मि. मी. है ।

FREEDOM

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 171 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13349 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4611. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Steel Tape Measure of brand name " FREEDOM " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s Shiva Metaltech Ltd, Trilokpur Road , Village Kheri , Kala Amb , District Sirmour, Himanchal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 05/849;

The said model is a Steel Tape Measures of maximum length 100m and smallest division Imm and of accuracy class - III . The width of the tape is 13mm , thickness is 0.23 mm and the thickness of graduation is 0.40 mm .

FREEDOM

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 171 )/20041

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13350

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4612.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिवा मेटल टैक लिमिटेड, त्रिलोकपुर रोड , खेड़ी गांव , काला अम्ब , जिला सिरमौर, हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित स्टील माप फीते के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फ्रीडम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 2005 / 848 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्टील माप फीता है । इसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 50 मीटर और सबसे छोटी इकाई 2 मि. मि. और यथार्थता वर्ग- III है । फीते कीचौड़ाई 14.62 मि. मि. मोटाई 0.47 मि. मी , अंशांकन की मोटाई 1 मि. मी. है ।

FREEDOM

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 171 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13351

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November. 2005

S.O. 4612. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Steel Tape Measurc of brand name " FREEDOM " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Shiva Metaltech Ltd.. Trilok Pur Road , Village Kheri , Kala Amb , Distrist Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /05/848 ;

The said model is a Steel Tape Measures of maximum length 50m . and smallest division 2mm . and of accuracy class - III . The width of the tape is 14.62 mm . thickness is 0.47mm. and the thickness of graduation is 1 mm.

FREEDOM

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 171 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 13352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4613.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स शिवा मेटल टैक लिमिटेड, त्रिलोकपुर रोड, खेड़ी गांव , कला अम्ब, जिला सिरमौर , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित स्टील माप फीते के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फ्रीडम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 847 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल स्टील माप फीता है । इसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 15 मीटर और सबसे छोटी इकाई 1 मि. मि. और यथार्थता वर्ग ।।। हैं । फीते कीचौड़ाई 24.8 मि. मि. मोटाई 0.17 मि.मी. और वेडिंग प्वाइंट 200 सें. मी. है । अंशांकन की मोटाई 0.35 मि. मी. है ।

FREEDOM

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिक्ति मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उसे खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं . डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 171 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13353 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4613. Whereas the Central Governinent , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Steel Tape Measure of brand name " FREEDOM " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Shiva Metaltech Ltd.. Trilok Pur Road, Village Kheri , Kala Amb , District Sirmour , Himachal Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /05/847;

The said Model is a Steel Tape Measures of maximum length 15m and smallest division 1mm and accuracy class - III . The width of the tape is 24.8 mm , thickness is 0.17 mm and the bending point is 200 cm . The thickness of graduation is 0.35 mm .

FREEDOM

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 171 )/200041

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ії ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13354

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4614.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और भाप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स कैस बेईंग इण्डिया प्राईवेट लि. , 568 , उद्योग विहार, फेस- V, गुड़गांव, हरियाणा-122016 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यू- एल आर " आर श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कैस" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005/928 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 किग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री , से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्राम से 50 मि. ग्रा. के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 175)/2005]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 13355 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4614. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digitial indication " SW - LR " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " CAS" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s Cas Weighing India Private Limited, 568 , Udhyog Vihar, Phase -V, Gurgaon , Haryana - 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/928;

The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain guage type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x100k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 175 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1/05-7 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13356

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4615.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स कैस वेईंग इण्डिया प्राईवेट लि. , 568 , उद्योग विहार, फेस- V, गुड़गांव, हरियाणा-122016 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले ' एस डब्ल्यू- एल आर ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " कैस" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 /929 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है। उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा। और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज मे सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 175 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13357 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4615.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SW - LR " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " CAS " ( hercin referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M /s Cas Weighing India Private Limited . 568. Udhyog Vihar , Phase-V. Gurgaon , Haryana - 122016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2005/929.

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of It ) g . The verification scale interval (c) is 5g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply :

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in range of 100 to 10.000 for ` e` value of 100 mg to 2g with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 110 %, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 %. K being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacaturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactred.

IF. No. WM -21 (175 )/20051

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 13358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4616.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स कैस वेईंग इण्डिया प्राईवेट लि. , 568 , उद्योग विहार, फेस- V, गुड़गांव , हरियाणा-122016 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले ' सी पी एस' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित स्वसूचक , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( पेल्लेट वेईंग मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " कैस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005 / 930 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 किलो ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा। और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जों 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 क्रि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 175)/2005 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 13359 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4616. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions; Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating, non- automatic ( Pallet Weighing Machine ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CPS" series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " CAS " ( herein referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s Cas Weighing India Private Limited, 568 , Udhyog Vihar , Phase - V, Gurgaon , Haryana - 122016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/930 ;

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 2000kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shal ! also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also also cover the weighing instrument of same scries with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e'value of 5g or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k . 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k , K being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zcro manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principles . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 175)/20051

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 13360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4617.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( मीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हार्दिक मेडीटेक, 25/5 , इन्दिरा विकास कालोनी ( निरंकारी स्कूल के सामने ) दिल्ली -110009 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " प्रेस्टीज 150 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " प्रेस्टीज" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005/ 904 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एकविकृत गेज प्रकार भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डिस्प्ले ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 12-24 वोल्ट डी सी पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केंन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री , से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 कि. ग्रा. से 200 कि. ग्रा. तक सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 239 )/2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13361 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4617.-Whereas the Central Governinent , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Person Weighing Machine) with digital indication of " Prestige - 150 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " Prestige" ( herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Hardik Medi Tech , 25/5 , Indira Vikas Colony, (Opp . Nirankari School ) , Delhi - 110009 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/2009/05 /904;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Person Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 150kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g . The Lequid Crystal Display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 12-24 Volt DC:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range 10t0kg . to 200kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e'value of 5g. or ntore and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % . 2 × 10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles . design and with the same materials with which , the said approval model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (239 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 13362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19. 1927 [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4618.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा औरविभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स हार्दिक मेडीटेक, 25/5 , इन्दिरा विकास कालोनी ( निरंकारी स्कूल के सामने ) दिल्ली-110009 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " प्रेस्टीज 20 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित शिशु तोलन उपकरण/मशीन ( शिशु तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " प्रेस्टीज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 2005/ 903 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार भार सैल आधारित अस्त्रचालित ( शिशु तोलन मशीन ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यत्रकलनात्मकः धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डिस्प्ले ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 12-24 बोल्ट डी सी पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लैट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री मे, जिमसे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा . तक ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 239 )/2004|

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13363 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4618. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rüles , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighng instrument (Baby Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of " Prestige- 20 " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Prestige " (herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Hardik Medi Tech , 25/5 , Indira Vikas Colony, (Opp . Nirankari School ) , Delhi - 110009 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/903;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Baby weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 20kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Lequid Crystal Display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 12-24 Volt DC .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of Similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e'value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufaactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (239)/2 ( 0041

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1 /05-8 13364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4619.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वार्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स पल्स डिजीटैक ( इण्डिया ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, प्लाट सं . 2421 /ए, रोड सं. 2 , यू-6 , अरीहन्त काम्पलैक्स , जी आई डी सी, सचिन , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " पीयूटी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " पल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2004/ 556 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि..ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10 के , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 08 )/ 2003 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13365

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November . 2005

S.O. 4619. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " PUT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy Class - II ) and with brand name " PULSE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s. Pulse Digitech ( India ) Private Limited. Plot No. 2421 /A , Road No. 2 , U-6 , Arihant Complex . G.I.D.C. , Sachin . Surat ( Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2004/556;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 12kg. and minimum capacity of 50g. The verification scale interval (e) is 1g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k. where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacture in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (08 )/20031

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13366

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.. 4620.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वार्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स पल्स डिजीटैक ( इण्डिया ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, प्लाट सं. 2421 /ए, रोड सं. 2 , यू-6 , अरिहन्त काम्पलैक्स , जी आई डी सी, सचिन, गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम वथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पीयूपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " पल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2004/ 557 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

PLATFORM

SCALE

FEATURES

CON

RAT MODS

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 1,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक 1,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 110 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 08 )/2003 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13367 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4620. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of non - automatic ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " PUP " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " PULSE " ( herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Pulse Digitech ( India ) Private Limited. Plot No. 2421/A. Road No.2 , U- 6 , Arihant Complex , G.I.D.C .. Sachin , Surat ( Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 2004 /557 .

PLATFORM

30 послу Baci up

steelpam Envirenmantaly

protected Loadc

Auto zime backing

Onpanel indicaY

ACON BATECHARGE

BATTMODE LOWHATT

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 1,000 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (08 )/2003 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 13368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4621.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स प्रिज्म इलेक्ट्रॉनिक सिस्टम , रेलवे स्टेशन जंक्शन, अलूवा रोड, अंगामलि, जिला एरनाकुलम , केरल-683572 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " पी.ई.एस. जे.पी. " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " प्रिज्म " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 2005/799 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आद्येयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आद्येयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल.ई.डी) प्रदर्श तौलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट ए सी, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (198 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13369 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4621. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the modal of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of series " PES - JP " of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " PRISM " manufactured by M/s Prism Electronic System , Rly. Stn . Jn,, Aluva Road , Angamaly, Ernakulam Distt . , Kerala- 683572 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /2005/799 ;

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 2g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% . k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 198 )/2005 }

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13370

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4622.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स प्रिज्म इलेक्ट्रॉनिक सिस्टम , रेलवे स्टेशन जंक्शन , अलूवा रोड, अंगामलि, जिला एरनाकुलम, केरल-683572 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग (यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पी.ई.एस. टी.पी. " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' प्रिज्म " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2005 / 800 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का ) अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोग ( एल.ई.डी) प्रदर्श परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट ए सी, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TRUE WEIGHT

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा . से 2 ग्रा. , तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (198 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13371 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4622. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of series "PES - TP " of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " PRISM " manufactured by M/ s Prism Electronic System , Rly. Stn . Jn . , Aluva Road, Angamaly. Ernakulam Distt . , Kerala -683572 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 2005 /800 ;

The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply:

TRUE WEIGHT BY

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e'value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , K being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 198 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1/05-9 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13372

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4623.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेंगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रिज्म इलेक्ट्रॉनिक सिस्टम , रेलवे स्टेशन जंक्शन , अलूवा रोड, अंगामलि, जिला एरनाकुलम, केरल 683572 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले पी. ई. एस. पी. टी. श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसका ब्रांड का नाम प्रिज्म है ( जिसे इसमे इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/2005/801 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा। स्टाम्पिग प्लेट के सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 198 ) / 2005] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13373 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4623. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self - indicating. non- automatic , ( Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of series ' PES - PT ' of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) and with brand name " PRISM " manufactured by M/ s . Prism Electronic System , Rly. Stn . Jn .. Aluva Road, Angamaly, Ernakulam Dist . , Kerala -683572 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/801 .

The said Model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 k . g . and minimum capacity of 40 k. g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above 50 k.g. and up to 5.000 k . g . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 , or 5 × 10 % , k being the postitive or negative whole number or equal to zero . maufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 198 )/20051

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 13374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4624.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नमन इम्पेक्स, साहकर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, यूनिट नं. 116 , प्लाट सं. 165-166, नवं ग्राम, वसाई रोड ( पूर्वी ) , जिला थाने-401105 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस ए पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सालेचा " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/05/769 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10 के, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 202 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13375 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi . the 23rd November. 2005

S.O. 4624. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (accuracy elass - III ) and brand Name " SALECHA" and series " SAP " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Naman Impex , Sahakar Indl. Estate, Unit No 116 , Plot No 165-166 , Vill : Navaghar, Vasai Rd. East, Dist Thane - 401105 , Maharashtra and which isassigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/ 769 ;

The said model ( see the figure givern below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2kg .The verification scale interval (e ) is 100 g. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k . k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle: design and with the same materials with which the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM - 21 (202 )/20041

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II - SEC, 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13376

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4625.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अंब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नमन इम्पेक्स , साहकर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, यूनिट नं. 118 , प्लाट सं. 165-166, नव ग्राम , वसाई रोड ( पूर्वी ) , जिला थाने-401105 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस. एच. पी. " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार )के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सालेचा " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/05/770 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का) है । इसकी आधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अनतराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 202 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13377 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4625. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and brand " SALECHA " and series " SAT" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Naman Impex , Sahakar Indl . Estate, Unit No. 116 , Plot No. 165-166, Vill : Navaghar, Vasai Rd. East , Distt . Thane-401105, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/ 770 ;

The said model ( see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10* or5 × 10* , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , maufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (202) /2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13378

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4626.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नमन इम्पेक्स साहकर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, यूनिट नं ०118 , प्लाट स० 165-166, नव ग्राम वसाई रोड ( पूर्वी ) , जिला थाने-401105 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस ए बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( गुसलखाना स्केल प्रकार ) केमॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सालेचा " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/ 05/771 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) कि एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 20 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 1,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 11 ×× 10 , 2 x 10 के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 202 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13379 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005.

S.O. 4626. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non - automatic weighing instrument ( Bathroom Scale Type ) with digital indication of ordinary accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and brand "SALECHA " and series " SAB " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Naman Impex , Sahakar Indl . Estate , Unit No. 116 , Plot No. 165-166 , Vill : Navaghar , Vasai Rd . East . Dist . Thane -401105 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /05 / 771 :

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity upto 200kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 1,000 for ' e ' value of 20g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10% , or5 × 10 %, k being the postitive or negative whole number or equal to zero , maufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured

IF. No. WM- 21 (202 )/ 2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1/05-10 13380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4627.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नमन इम्पेक्स साहकर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट यूनिट न ०118 , प्लाट स० 165-166 , नव ग्राम वसाई रोड ( पूर्वी ) , जिला थाने -401105 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस ए जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सालेचा " है ( जिसे इसमें उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 05/768 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार का) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टॉपिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा . तक ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के' ई' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान ( एन ) अंतराल सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 202 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13381 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi, the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4627. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non- automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and brand "SALECHA " and series " SAJ " ( herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s Naman Impex , Sahakar Indl . Estate , Unit No. 116 , Plot No. 165-166, Vill : Navaghar, Vasai Rd. East, Dist . Thane -401105 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 05 /768;

The said model (see the figure given below) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ` e` value of 1 × 10k . 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , k being the postitive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 202)/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13382

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4628.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रॉकविन फ्लोमीटर इंडिया प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, बी-24, साइट- IV साहिबाबाद इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, जिला गाजियाबाद-201010 , उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा निर्मित " टी आर जेड-03 " श्रृंखला के कस्टडी ट्रांसफर के लिए ( टरबाइन फ्लो मीटर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " रॉकविन फ्लो मीटर " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2005/ 927 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( उक्त आकृति देखें ) एक टरबाइन फ्लोमीटर है जिसमें एक रोटोर एसेम्बली हाउसिंग बॉडी और इन्डेक्स हैड है । गैस का प्रवाह संकरा है ताकि रोटर जिसका कोणीय वेग गैस वेग के औसत प्रवाह अनुरूप है जिससे गैस के प्रवाह को सूचित रेंज में रखा जा सके । रोटर के रोटरी संचलन को संसूचित कुल प्रवाह के लिए एक मैगनेटिक कप्लिग के माध्यम से रोलर इन्डेक्स में ट्रांसमिट किया जाता है । यह टेस्ट ओ आई एम एल आर 32में " रोटरी पिस्टन गैस मीटर और टरबाइन गैस मीटर " के लिए विहित सामान्य मानदण्डों के अनुसार किया जाता है । तकनीकी ब्यौरा इस प्रकार है:-

टाइप- टरबाइन फ्लो मीटर

मॉडल नं. टी आर जेड 03

आकार- 6 " ऐन बी

यथार्थता +/- 0.5%

सामान्य प्रवाह रेंज 80 1600 मी/घंटा

स्टापिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी डिजाइन यथार्थता तथा सामग्री से विनिर्मित 2 " , 3 " , 4 " , 8 " , 10" और 12 " के टरबाइन फ्लो मीटर भी शामिल होंगे ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 367 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13383 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4628. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby approves and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the Turbine Flow Meter of series ' TRZ -03 ' and brand name ' Rockwin Flow Meter ' for custody transfer, manufactured by M/ s . Rockwin Flow Meter India Private Limited, B- 24 , Site- IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area , District-Ghaziabad - 201010 , Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /05 /927;

The said model ( see the figure given below ) is a turbine flow meter which consists of a rotor assembly . housing body and indiex head, The gas flow is narrowed to a definite cross section rotating the rotor whose angular velocity is proportional to the mean velocity of the gas flow within the range indicated. The rotatory movement of the rotor is transmitted to a roller index by means of a magnetic coupling for indication of total flow. The test was conducted as per the general norms laid down in the OIML R 32 for "Rotatory Piston gas meters and Turbine gas meter " and OIML R 6 for " General Provision for gas volume meters " . The technical details as follows :-

Type-Turbine Flow Meter

ModelNo. TRZ 03

Size-6" NB

Accuracy -+/- 0.5%

Nominal Flow range - 80-1600m³ /hr

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

This certificate of model approval also covers sizes of 2 " , 3 " , 4 " , 8 " , 10 " & 12 " turbine flow Meter manufactured with same design , accuracy and with the same material .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 367 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 13384

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4629.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सैन्शूई इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स, खसरा नं. 579, प्लॉट नं. 130 , सेक्टर 1 , पहली मंजिल , हिमफेड इन्डस्ट्रीज के सामने, परवानू-173220 ( हिमाचल प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग-III ) वाले " सैन्शूई-04 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन संहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मानव भार मापने वाला तोल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सैन्शूई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी / 09 / 2005 / 905 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल. ई. डी. ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टापिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 200 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 207 )/2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13385 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4629. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument with digital indication (Person weighing scale ) of " Sansui -04 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SANSUI " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Sansui Electronics , Khasra No. 579 , Plot No. 130, Sector 1 , 1st Floor, Opp . Himfed Industries . Parwanoo - 173220 (H.P. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005/905;

The said Model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 200kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k, k being the postitive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved said Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (207 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13386

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4630.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ए एक्स जोन डिजि - वे , 11 कृष्ण कुंज पार्क सोसायटी, कतवादा रोड, नई नरोदा, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ए एक्स जोन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09 / 2005/ 764 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.'ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिरा प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री , से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5,000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (96 ) /2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13387 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

New Delhi, the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4630. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( See the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and brand name "AX - ZONE " ( herein after referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Ax -Zone Digi - Weigh , II . Krishna Kunj Park Society, Kathwada Road, New Naroda . Ahmedabad , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /2005 /764:

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100 g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and up to 5000 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10h or 5 × 10 % . k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 96 )/2004 |

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 3423 GI /05-11 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13388

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4631.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ए एक्स जोन डिजि- वे, 11 कृष्ण कुंज पार्क सोसायटी , कतवादा रोड, नई नरोदा, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ए एक्स- जोन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/763 सममुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (96 )/2004 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13389

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4631. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - 11 ) and brand name "AX -ZONE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . AX - Zone Digi -Weigh . 11. Krishna Kunj Park Society, Kathwada Road, New Naroda . Ahmedabad, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/05/763;

The said Model ( see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 22 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate . scaling shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mgto 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k . k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM-21 (96 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology 13390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4632.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इक्विटी वेइंग सिस्टम, प्लाट नं. एन-4/बी, प्रथम तल, कामा इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , वालभट रोड, जापान इंडस्ट्रीज के पीछे , गोरेगांव ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400063 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ई जे टी -15 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार )के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इक्विटी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2005/ 952 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृति गेज प्रकार भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और। केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकिउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यापालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान अंतराल सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं,हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं । ×

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 77 ) /2002 ]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13391

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4632. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " EJT - 15 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " EQUITY " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Equity Weighing Systems , Plot No. N -4 /B, 1st Floor, Cama Industrial Estate , Walbhat Road, Opp . Japan Industries , Goregaon (E) , Mumbai -400 063 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2005/952 ;

The said Model (see the figure given below ) is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval (e) is 1g. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of up to 100kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k. 2 × 10 or 5× 10k , being the a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (77 )/2002 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13392

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर , 2005

का.आ. 4633.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ऐनीवे इंडिया प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, एफ 87 , ओखला इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , नई दिल्ली-110020 द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूपी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ऐनीवे " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 2005 / 662 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) एक विकृति गेज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण ' है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए उसे खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वेसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 110 *, 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 120 )/2005 ] पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13393

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4633. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of " AWP " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class- III) and with brand name " Annieweigh " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Annieweigh India Private Limited , F - 87 , Okhala Industrial Estate , New Delhi - 110020 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/662;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent from opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Governinent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ` e` value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principles , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 120 )/2005 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13394

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4634.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, किन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ब्लूबर्ड इंटरनेशनल , 35 , देश सेवा इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट केमीकल के सामने , ओथव , अहमदाबाद द्वारा निर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " बी बी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ब्लूबर्ड " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 05 / 783 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

PREMIUM

COUNTER SCALE

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विकृत गैज प्रकार का लोड सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार का ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को मुद्रांकित करने के अतिरिक्त कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया i

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 1010 के,* , 2 × 10 के या 5 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 31 ) /2004 |

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 13395 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2005

S.O. 4634. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " BBT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "Blue Bird " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/ s Blue Bird International , 35 , Desh Seva Ind . Estate , Opposite Jay Chemical , Odhav, Ahmedabad-382 415 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 /05 / 783 ;

PREMIUM COUNTER

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply ;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verificaion scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacaturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 31 )/2004 ]

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY. Director of Legal Metrology 3423 G1/05-12- [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13396

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4635.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ब्लूबर्ड इंटरनेशनल, 35 देश सेवा इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट केमीकल के सामने , ओथव, अहमदाबाद द्वारा निर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " बी बी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचम सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ब्लूबर्ड " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/05 /784 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृति गैज प्रकार का लोड सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलम उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मान सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से अधिक और 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 31 )/2004]

पी. ए. कृष्णामूर्ति, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 13397 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2005

S.O. 4635. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication.of " BBP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name "Blue Bird " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Blue Bird International , 35, Desh Seva Ind. Estate, Opposite Jay Chemical , Odhav, Ahmedabad- 382 415 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/05/784;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 500kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply;

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 1000kg with verificaion scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 31 )/2004 )

P. A. KRISHNAMOORTHY, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19. 1927

13398

00-35-00

2 पै

अलिबाग भाकरवाड-

रायगड

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय | नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2005

00-17-00

3/1 पै

जारी

00-11-00

3/3 पै

3/4पै

5/4पै

5/5 पै

00-27-00

5/ 1B पै

5/3पै

5/2पै

5/6 पै

(X)-200-( X )

6/4A पै

का.आ. 4636.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्याका.आ. 1412 ( अ ) तारीख 24-12-2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना सेसंलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में दहेज़- हजीरा उरान एवं स्पर पाइपलाईनों के माध्यम सेप्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी;

6/6 पै

00-12-00

6/1 पै

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 31-05-2005 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

00-24-00

8/2पै

वालवडे

8/5 पै

9/3 पै

और पाइपलाईन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;

00-15-00

9/4पै

9/1/2पै

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

11/1 पै

10/4पै

00-45-00

10/2 पै

10/3 पै

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाईनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उस में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

10/1 पै

14/4पै

00-07-60

14/3 पै

14/1 पै

00-18-00

14/2पै

अतः, अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

13/4+2 पै

00-28-60

13/3+ 1 पै

15/2पै

00-12-00

दहेनकरी

00-07-400

14पै

15/3 पै 00-11-00

00-15-00

15/4 पै

15/5 पै

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निर्देश देती है कि पाइपलाईनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को, केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाईनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

00-54-00

सरकारी जमीन

शहाबाज

722पै

अनुसूची

00-35-00

724पै

सर्वे नं.

आर.ओ.यू.

तहसील गाँव

जिला

00-14-00

729पै

अर्जित करने

707

के लिए क्षेत्रफल

00-19-00

733

(हैक्ट, में)

00-39-00

737

738

(00-07-00

781

13बी/ 1 पै

रायगड अलिबाग भाकरवाड

780

13/B/2पै

00-16-00

822

00-26-00

13/एपै [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

779

अलिबाग शहाबाज

रायगढ़

00-27-00

823

821

00-17-00

837

00-29-00

849

838

00-17-00

850/2पै

848

00-21-00

855

00-12-00

854

00-11-00

856

857

860B पै

863

861 पै

862

887

00-21-00

886

882

00-22-00

885

893

895/2पै 00-14-00

896

897

00-17-00

899

00-27-00

900

00-22-00

901

902

00-56-00

906

907

912

914

00-13-00

913

915

916

00-15-00

कालवडखार 3 पै

2पै

262पै

00-15-00

1पै

261पै

00-11-00

251 पै

232पै

13399

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

5 3

00-25-00

22पै

अलिबाग कोलघर

रायगढ़

00-19-00

सरकारी जमीन

01-76-000

33/1/1 पै

(00-23-00

सरकारी जमीन

बेलोशी

[फा. सं. एल-14014/23/05- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 29th November, 2005

S.O. 4636. Whereasby notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S. O. 1412 ( E) dated 24-12-2004 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act , 1962 (5t ) of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of natural gas through Dahej - Hazira- Uran and its spur pipclines in the State of Maharashtra by the GAIL ( India ) Limited:

Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 31-5-2005;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority:

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . submitted its report to the Central Governinent :

And whereas the Central Government has . after considering the said report , decided to acquire the right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying thepipeline:

And. further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby directs that the right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government . vest . on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL ( India ) Limited. free from all encumbrances .

13400

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

1 SCHEDULE

Taluka

District

Village Survey No.

00-19-00 Shahabaz 733

Raigad Ali-

00-39-00

737

baug

738

781

00-16-00

780

Area

tobe

acquired

for ROU

(InHect.)

13B/ IP

Raigad Alibaug Bhakarvad }

13/B/2P

822

779

00-27-00

823

821

00-17-00

837

00-26-00

13 /AP

00-29-00

849

00-35-00

3/1P

838

00-17-00

850/2P

00-11-00

3/3P

3/4P

5/4P

5/5P

00-27-00

5/1BP

5/3 P

5/2P

5/6P

6/4AP

848

00-21-00

855

854

00-12-00

856

00-11-00

857

860B P

863P

861P

862

887

00-12-00

6/6 P

6/ IP

00-24-00

8/2P

Raigad Alibaug Valvade

8/5P

9/3 P

00-15-00

9/4P

9/1/2P

11/1 P

10/4 P

00-45-00

10/2P

10/3 P

10/1 P

14/4P

886

00-21-00

882

00-22-00

885

893

00-14-00

895/2P

896

897

00-01:00

899

00-17-00

00-27-00

900

00-22-00

901

902

00-56-00

906

907

912

914

00-07-60

14/3 P

14/1 P

00-13-00

913

915

916

00-18-00

14/2P

13/4+2P

00-28-60

13/3+ 1P

00-15-00

3 P

Klawadk-

har

262P

00-12-00

15/2 P

Dahenkoni

14P

00-11-00

15/3 P

00-15-00

15/4 P

15/5 P

00-54-00 Shahabaz Govt . Land

722P

00-15-00

261 P

00-11-00

251 P

232P

00-25-00

22P

Kolghar

00-19-00

Govt. Land

01-76-00

33/1/1 P

00-23-00

Govt.Lnad

Belosi

00-35-00

724 P

00-14-00

729 P

707

[F. No. L- 14014/23/05 - G.P. ]

S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) )

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4637.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 692 ( अ ) तारीख 14-06-2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में दहेज- हजीरा उरान एवं स्पर पाइपलाइनों के माध्यम सेप्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 04-04-2005 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी मे, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित हैं, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार , इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

सर्वे नं.

आर.ओ.यू.

जिला तहसील गाँव

13401

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/ अग्रहायण 19, 1927

पनवेल मोहोपे

रायगढ़

(00-55-000

69/1पै 69/2पै 68पै

पोयंजे 181

00-15-00

180

00-57-00

178

141/पै

173

00-16-00

136/3 पै

136/4 पै

00-15-00

136/5 पै

00-23-00

131/6पै

131/7 पै

00-18-00

131/10पै

00-13-00

125

124

108/1पै

00-01-50

108/2 पै

108/44

00-21-00 भिंगारवाडी 93

00-27-00

00-19-000

00-43-00

(00-02-00

.29

00-13-00 आजीवली

00-13-00

53/0 पै 60/1 पै 60/2 पै

62/1+ 2

63/1 पै

00-74-00

63/2पै

00-29-00

00-31-00

74/0 पै

सांगडे

अर्जित करने

00-18-00

131/1+2 130

के लिए क्षेत्रफल

(हैक्ट. में)

00-42-00

53 पै

भोकरपाडा

पनवेल

रायगढ़

51 पै

00-36-00

109 पै

बोरले

00-31-00

111 पै

00-13-00

112पै

72पै

मोहोपे

129

128

127/2 पै

00-13-00

125

00-11-(0 )

00-13-00

141 124/1 पै 122 117

114/3 पै 112/2 पै [PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13402

2 3

529

00-16-00

खालापुर खानाव

109

रायगढ़

पनवेल सांगडे

रायगढ़

धारणी

96/1+2

00-11-00

2/12पै

00-14-00

00-17-00

गांवठाण

00-18-00

दहिवल

112/0 पै

शेडूंग

00-18-00

37/3पै

निंबोडे

114/1 पै

41/2पै

00-79-00

114/2 पै

63/1पै

114/3 पै

63/2पै

115/0 पै

34/7पै

00-14-00

116/0 पै

56/1पै

117/1+2

56/2पै

010-27-00

42/0 पै

58पै

121/1 पै

00-54-00

00-11-00

131/0पै

आसरोटी

00-47-00

45/2 पै

खांबेवाडी

130/0 पै

45/1पै

00-17-00

84/1पै

भिगार

00-21-00

45/3पै

83/3 पै

00-23-00

5/2+3+6+7

83/4 पै

5/4पै

83/5 पै

00-16-00 83/6

5/5 पै

00-13-00

43/4पै

नडोदे

79पै

00-15-00

43/15पै

80/4 पै

00-45-00

00-12-00

78पै

55पै

74/3पै

00-33-00 54/1+2+3+4

74/2पै

चिखले 58

00-22-00

24/1पै

हरनोली

सुधागड

00-26-00

00-12-00

252/1 पै

घोटवडे

00-29-00

00-23-00

253/1 पै

00-53-00

253/6पै

254/1 पै

निगडोली

00-54-00

247/2पै

89/1Aपै

00-39-00

245/1पै

89/2Aपै

235/1Aपै

00-44-00

89/2Bपै

00-26-00

235/1Bपै

106

00-12-00

00-29-00 कासारवाडी 26

114

118/4Aपै

00-15-00

118/4Bपै

अडुलशे

119

57/1/1पै

उम्बरे

( 00-01-00

01-05-000

57/A/ 1 पै

57/A/2पै

71Aपै

71Bपै

57/2Aपै

00-22-400

57/2Bपै

00-66-00

57/3पै

00-29-00

14पै

57/4Aपै

खालापुर वणवे

4पै

57/4Bपै

3पै

57/5+6+7Aपै

00-26-00

1पै

57/5+6+7B पै 52पै 13403 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

55/1Aपै

रायगड

Andwhereas the Central Government has , after con- sidering the said report, decided to acquire the Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule ;

खालापुर उम्बरे

55/1Bपै

55/2Aपै

55/2Bपै

55/3 पै

00-24-00

Now, therefore, in exercise of the conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

55/4 पै

55/5+6पै

55/7 पै

55/8 पै

00-68-00

52/1,2,3 पै

147

00-14-00

171

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of the publica- tionof the declaration , in the GAIL ( India) Limited, free from all encumbrances .

00-25-00

102/1A+ 1B+ 1C3

रिस

SCHEDULE

102/C2

District

102/C1

Village

Taluka

}

Survey No.

102/2 पै

101/1A पै

00-39-00

Are to be Rcquired for ROU (inHect.) 101/1B पै }

101/2 पै

94/2पै

00-42-00

Bhokharpada 53 P

Panvel

Raigad

94/3 पै }

51 P

00-22-00

96/1पै

00-36-00

109 P

Borle

00-31-00

111 P 96/2 पै

00-13-00

112P 95/1 पै

72P.

00-11-00

86/1To 7 पै

Mohope

69/1 P 119/Aपै

00-55-00

69/2P

00-88-00

59A पै

68 P

181

[फा. सं. एल-14014/23/05-जी. पी. ]

Povanje

00-15-00

180

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

178 00-57-00 New Delhi , the 29th November, 2005

141/1 P 00-03-00

173

00-16-00

136/3 P

136/4P

00-15-00

136/5P

00-23-00

131/6P

00-02-00

131/7 P

00-18-00 .

131/10P

125 00-13-00

124

00-10-00

108/ 1P

00-01-50

108/2P

00-07-00 .

108/4P S.O. 4637. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 692 (E) dated 14-06-2004 issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of natural gas through Dahej - Hazira- Uran and its spur pipelines in the State of Maharashtra by the GAIL ( India ) Limited;

00-21-00

Bhingarwadi

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 04-04-2005;

00-27-00

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority ;

00-19-00

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to the Central Government;

3423 G1/05-13 13404

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

24/1P

00-10:00 35

00-43-00

Sudhagad Hamoli

Raigad

Bhingarwadi

Raigad PanyPanvel

252/ 1P 00-12-00

Ghotavade

00-29-00

253/1P

253/6P

00-09-00 29

254/ 1P 00-02-00

00-13-00

53/0 P

Ajivali

00-54-00

247/2P

00-13-00

60/1 P

245/ IP 00-39-00

00-13-00

60/2P

235/ 1AP 61

00-26-00

235/ 1BP

00-74-00

62/1+2

}

Kasarwadi 26

00-12-00 63/1 P

63/2P

00-29-00

00-15-00

Adulshe 99

00-31-00)

74/0 P

01-05-00

131/ 1+2 000-02-00

Sangade

71AP

130 00-18-00

129

71BP

128

(00-06-00

127/2P

125 00-13-00

( 00-66-00

14P

(10-29-00

Vanve

Khalapur

00-11-00

141

(00-13-00

124/ 1P

122

00-26-00 117

0-04-00

52P

114/3P (

00-10-00

112/2P

529

Khanav

109 00-16-00

00-200-00

96/1+2

Dharni

2/ 12P

00-11-00

112/0P 00-18-00

Sedunge

00-14-00

Dahiwali Govthan

( 0-01-00

114/ 1P

( 0017-00

Nimbode 37/3P

( 0-79-000

114/2P

41/2P

00-18-00

00-03-00

114/3P

63/ 1P

00-05-(0 )

115/0P

63/2P

00-1400

116/0P

34/7P

(00-02-000

117/ 1 +2

42/0P 00-27-00

56/ IP

00-54-00

121/ IP

56/2P

00-06-00

58P

131 /0P

00-44-00

00-06-00

130/0P

Asro( i

00-17-00

84/ 1P

Bhingar

00-11-00

45/2P

00-47-00

Khambe-

83/3P

45/ IP

wadi

83/4P 00-06-00

( 00-07-000

00-21-00

45/3P

00-01-00

83/5P

00-23-00

5/2+3+6+7

83/6P

5/4P

79P

0000400

5/5P

00-16-00

00-15-00

80/4P

00-13-00

Nadode 43/4P

78P

00-12-00

43/ 15P

55P

00-45-00

54/ 1+

2+3+4

74/3P

00-33-00

Chikhale 13405

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

5 2

Nadode 74/2P

Raigad Khala-

00-22-00

pur

00-26-00

00-23-00

00-53-00

Nigdoli

89/1AP

89/2AP }

00-44-00

89/2BP

106

00-29-00

114

118/4AP

118/4BP }

119

57/1/1P

Umbre

57/A/ IP

57 /A/2P

57 /2AP

00-22-00

57/2BP

57/ 3P

57/4AP

57/4BP

57/5+6+7AP

57/5+6+7BP

55/ 1AP

55/ 1BP

55/2AP

55/2BP

00-24-00

55/3 P

55/4P

55/5+6 P

55/7 P

55/8 P

00-68-00

52/1,2,3 P

147

00-14-00

171

00-25-00

102/ 1A+ 1B+ 1C3 Ris

102/C2

102/C1

}

102/2P

101/1 AP

00-39-00

}

101/ 1BP

101/2P

94/2 P

}

94/3 P

00-22-00

96/1P

96/2P

5 2

95/1 P

Ris

Raigad Khala-

00-11-00

86/1 Το 7 Ρ

pur

119/AP

59A P

00-88-00

[File No. L - 14014/23/05 -G.P. ]

S.B. MANDAL. Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2005

का.आ. 4638.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1927 तारीख 29-7-2004 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में दहेज- हजीरा - उरान एवं स्पर पाइपलाइनों के माध्यम सेप्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिये पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा कीथी;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 4-4-2005 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गईं थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित हैं, उस में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार 13406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] अनुसूची

2 3

रायगड

00-14-00 सर्वे नं.

अलिबाग खतविराखार 46

जिला तहसील गाँव

आर.ओ.यू.

अर्जित करने

00-47-00

के लिए क्षेत्रफल

(हेक्ट. में)

खार सिमादेवी 10/2पै

अलिबाग

रायगड

10/4पै

251

कुसुबले

206

10/5पै

खार कालवड 132

10/6पै

00-23-00 12/1+2पै

देहेनकोनी

00-32-00 खार सांबरी 184

00-17-00

90/3 पै

147

90/2/2पै

149

90/1 पै

00-31-00

00-34-00

152

90/2/1 पै

150

भाकखड 13/ए पै

118/ए+बी

00-13-00

6/4ए पै

कोपरीखार

6/4बीपै

6/5 पै

00-29-00

2/ 1+ 2

6/7 पै

00-11-00

6/8 पै

00-17-00

7/4 पै

00-14-00 11

00-12-00

7/5एपै

00-29-00

7/5बीपै

7/6एपै

00-17-00

8/1 पै

8/3पै

00-23-00

8/6 पै

00-11-00

00-16-00

11/1 ए पै

11/2 पै

00-12-00 42

11/3 पै

11/4पै

00-33-00

11/5 पै

00-23-00 48

00-14-00

10/2पै

10/3 पै

101

10/4पै

00-14-00 85

00-16-00

10/9 पै

मेढेखार सरकारी जमीन खतविराखार 6

वाघविराखार 83

00-14-00

00-13-00

00-11-00

00-14-00

00-12-00

119

00-27-00 22

00-24-00 40

00-15-00

47 13407 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

रायगड पेण तरशेत

रायगड अलिबाग वाघविराखार 7

00-26-00

झोतिरपाडा 97

00-13-00

98/1

00-15-00

98/2Aपै

गावथान

21/2 पै

खार

चिखलीखार 16

00-11-00

00-26-00

18/2पै

आटीवली

00-17-00

00-29-00 24

18/1 पै

00-23-00 25

17/2पै

17/3 पै

00-48-00

15/2 पै

00-16-00

15/1 पै

00-12-00

गावथान

102

00-16-00

23/ 1B पै

खार चोले

101

00-21-00

23/ 1A पै

103

00-16-00

23/2 पै

109

23/3 पै

00-13-00

108

00-19-00

12/B पै

107

00-12-00

15/2A पै

00-41-00

खारफणसापुर 137

14/1A पै

00-12-00

123

14/1B पै

00-11-00

262

पिटकिरी

00-34-00

62/2 पै

सुधागड शिलोशी

00-26-00

274

00-28-00

62/1 पै

00-16-00

277

60/1A पै

282

60/1B पै

00-26-00

304

00-11-00

60/2पै

00-33-00

सरकारी जमीन

नवखार तर्फे

00-13-00

61/2पै

श्रीगांव

00-13-00

61/1 पै

00-16-00

61/3 पै

00-20-50

00-34-00

58/2 पै

58/3 पै

00-17-00

54/2पै

54/1 पै

00-35-00

(00-02-00

52/2 पै

52/3 पै

00-23-00

00-15-00

00-11-00

38/1Aपै

123

38/1B पै

00-14-00

126

39/2पै

00-17-00

121

00-23-000

39/3 पै

00-15-00

120

39/4 पै

00-15-00

113

00-25-00

39/5 पै

004000

00-14-00

3/ 2A पै

खारदुर्गदर्या

00-33-00

37/7A1.7A2

00-19-00

7/6B पै

37/7B 7C.7D

00-47-00

3/1 पै

37/10 पै

6/1Bपै

37/8 पै

00-52-00

2/पै

37/6 पै

1/3पै

37/5 पै

1/2पै

36/1 पै

00-13-00

00-19-00

92/ A+ B पै

खार कोलेटी

पेण

36/4 पै

00-23-00

9/3पै

35/4पै

00-28-00

सरकारी जमीन

00-17-0

35/3A. 3B 97 13408

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYAΝΑ 19 , 1927 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

2 3

35/2पै

00-21-00

वखटणे 156

00-21-00 रायगड सुधागड शिलोशी

रायगड रोहा

35/1 पै

00-11-00

102

00-15-00 31/1 पै

155

103

सिध्देश्वर खुर्द 16/ 2A पै

16/2B पै

00-15-00

104

00-19-00

105

आपटवणे 596

00-15-00

599

00-11-00

106

548

00-12-00

00-13-00

भाजें

107

624

रोहा

निडीतर्फे 8

नागोठणे

00-21-00 83

00-13-00

93Aपै

00-17-0 76

वेलशेत 288

00-22-00

89Aपै

000-61-00 बालसई 138

139

00-15-00

136

00-27-00

(0-24-000 सरकारी जमीन

143

00-14-00 127

00-19-00

147

135

00-15-00

145

129

00-11-00

00-11-00 128

(X- 14-(X)

(X)-12-(0)

सरकारी जमीन

117

18 .

00-13-00 118

0-29-00

200

115

00-25-00

114

25/Aपै

107

493

00-05-80

X -20-0X 98

492

00-12-00

(00-17-00 95

00-15-00

वांगणी 294

000-29-0 89

00-08-50

249

(0001-0 96

291

00-32-0 86

(00-02-00

293

290

0001-0 91

283

93/2पै

281

284

(00-09-00 38/1

0-25-00

285

00-35-00

296

278

274

000-28-00

305

00-19-00 नहर

303

00-12-00 वखटणे 188

00-51-000

304

00-11-00 167

00-17-00

306

160

365

166A पै

00-31-00

369

( 0-11-00 13409

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

362

वांगणी

रोहा

रायगड

00014-00

361

0-13-00

366

370

00-12-00

373

00-32-00

374/Aपै

00-26-00

379

381

382

00-43-00

00-14-00

388Aपै

386

387

385

392

00-21-00

391

00-13-00

395

00-12-00

396

00-34-00

400

402Aपै

00-24-00

401Aपै

00-25-00

130

शेतपलस

150

131

132

128

00-21-00

133

00-02-50

121

00-04-30

136

134

122

00-22-00

119

117

00-12-00

116

00-25-00

113

200

201

00-1400

202

00-15-00

203

00-46-00

218

219

220

221

232

00-15-00

231

234

00-24-00

255

254

264

00-24-00

265

266

1 2

00-12-00

268

रोहा शेतपलस

रायगड

281

00-16-00

280

282

00-36-00

286

287

285

(00-07-000

212

पलस

213

00-13-00

211

00-400-50

( 00-06-00

214

00-13-00

216

215

( 00-06-00

219/B

( 00-14401

216/Aपै

(00-17-4X)

225

218

220

00-19-00

228

229

00-34-00

230/Aपै

231

261

(010-07-000

258

257

(00-07-400

256

264

(X)-12-(X)

266/Aपै

267

00-0240)

268

250

(010-12-10)

249

248

00-23-000

00-11-00

316

315

314

00-13-000

313

312

00-41-000

311

000100

344

345

343

341

( 0-22-( 0)

342

346

347

348

01-20-00 गोडसई 33

00-15-00

66/1A

तामसोली

[फा. सं. एल.-14014/23/05- जी. पी. ।

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव 13410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2005 S.O. 4638. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S. O. 1927 dated 29-07-2004 issued under Sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUsers in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transport of natural gas through Dahej - Hazira- Uran and its spur pipelines in the State of Maharashtra by the GAIL(India) Limited;

Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification weremade available to the public on the 4-04-2005;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under Sub-scetion ( 1 ) ofSection 6 of the said Act, submitted its report ot the Central Government ;

Andwhereas the Central Government has , after con- sidering the said report , decided to acquire the Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule is hereby ac- quired for laying the pipeline ;

And, further, in exercise ofthe powers conferredby Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest , on this date of the publica- tionofthe declaration , in the GAIL ( India) Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

Area to be District Taluka Village Survey No.

acquired for ROU ( in Hect .) 1

5 2

Raigad Alibaug

10/2P

Kharsima-

10/4P

devi

10/5P

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) | 2

5 1

Raigad Alibaug Kharsima- 11/ 6P

devi

12/1+2P

Kharsambri 184

147

149

152

00-34-00

150

118/A+B

Kopari

Khare

2/ 1+2

00-29-00

00-11-00

00-17-00

00-29-00

00-17-00

000400

00-23-00

00-11-00

00-33-00

00-14-00

101

00-16-00

00000 Khativira 6

Khar

00-14:00

0-12-00

119

00-15-00

00-14-00

00-47-00

61 13411 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

00-27-00

Raigad Alibaug Waghvira 32

Raigad Alibaug Khativira 96

00-24-00 Khar

khar

Kusumbale 251

206

Kharkal 132

00-23-00

wad

Dehenkoni 2

00-26-00

00-32-00

00-13-00

00-17-00

90/3P

Gavthan

90/2/2P

Chikhlikhar 16

00-31-00

90/1 P

00-26-00

90/2/1 P

00-17-00

13 / A P

Bhakarvad

6/4AP

0-13-00

6/4BP

00-48-00

6/5P

00-16-00

6/7 P

6/8P

00-12-00

00-14-00

7/4 P

00-16-00

102

00-12-00

7/5AP

101

7/5B P

00-16-00

103

7/6A P

109

8/1 P

00-13-00

108

8/3 P

107

8/6 P

00-41-00

137

Kharpha-

00-16-00

11/ 1A P

00-12-00

naspur 123

00-12-00

11/2P

00-11-00

262

Pitkiri

11/3 P

00-26-00

274

11/4 P

00-16-00

277

00-23-00

11/5 P

282

10/2P

00-26-00

304

10/3P

00-33-00

Navkhar Govt. Land

00-14-00

10/4 P

Tarfe Shrigaon

10/9 P

00-20-50

Medhekhar GOVT.LAND

Waghvira 83

00-17-00

00-13-00

khar

00-14-00

00-12-00

00-23-00

00-15-00

3423 G1 /05-14 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 13412

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

00-34-00

58/2 P

123

Raigad Sudha- Shiloshi

Navkhar

Raigad Alibaug

58/3 P

00-14-00

Tarfe Shri- 126

gadh

54/2P

00-17-00

121

gaon

54/1 P

00-15-00

120

00-35-00

00-15-00

113

52/2P

00-14-00

3 /2A P

Khardur

52/3 P

00-19-00

3/2BP

gadarya

00-47-00

3/1 P

00-11-00

38/ 1AP

6/1B P

00-52-00

38/1B P

2/P

39/2P

1/3 P

00-23-00

39/3 P

1/2P

39/4 P

00-19-00

92/ A + BP

Pen: Kharkoleti

00-25-00

00-23-00

39/5 P

9/3 P

37/ 7A1,7A2

00-28-00

00-33-00 Govt. Land

37/7B , 7C, 7D 97

(00-402-(0)

37/10P

Tarsheth 31

37/8 P

Zotirpada 97

37/6 P

98/1

37/5 P

(000-15-000)

98/2AP

36/1 P

00-13-00 Khar

21/2 P

00-200-400

36/4 P

(0-11-000

18/2P

Aativali

35/4 P

00-29-00

18/1 P

35/3A, 3B

00-23-00

17/2P

(00) -17- (X)

35/2P

(00-21-400 17/3 P

15/2 P

00-11-00

35/1 P

15/1 P

31/1 P

Sidheshwar 16/2A P

Gavthan

00-15-00

16/2B P

(00-07-000

Kharchola 23 / IBP

00-19-00

Apatvanc 596

00-21-00

23/1 A P

599

23/2 P

00-13-00

548

23/3 P

(00-19-00

12/B P

Bharje 624

00-12-00

Nidi Turfe 8

Roha

15/ 2A P

14/ 1A P

Nagothane

00-13-00

14/ IB P

(00-01-00

62/2P

Sudha- Shiloshi

(00-22-400 62/1 P

Velsheta 288

gadh

(X)-07-4X) 60/ 1A P

138

Balsai

60/ IBP

139

00-15-00 60/2P

(X)-27-4 )

136

61/2P

Govt. Land

143

61/1 P

00-19-00

127

61/3 P 13413

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Varvatne 58

Raigad Roha

147

Raigad Roha Balsai

135

145

00-11-00

129

00-12-00

128

Govt. Land

117

00-29-00

118

115

00-25-00

114

107

00-05-80

00-12-00

00-15-00

00-08-50

93/2P

00-25-00

38/1

00-35-00

00-28-00

Canal

00-51-00 Varvatne 188

00-17-00

167

160

00-31-00

166AP

00-21-00

156

00-15-00

102

155

103

00-15-00

104

00-11-00

105

00-12-00

106

107

00-21-00

00-17-00

93AP

00-61-00

89AP

00-24-00

00-14-00

00-15-00

00-11-00

00-14-00

00-13-00

25/AP

493

492

00-17-00

00-29-00

294

Vangani

249

00-32-00

291

293

290

283

281

284

0060000

285

296

278

( 001- X)

274

00-19-000

305

00-12-000

303

304

00-11-00

306

(00-02-000

365

00-11-00

369

00-08-60

362

361

00-14-00

(X)-13-(X)

366

370

00-12-000

373

00-32-00

374/4P

00-26-00

379

381

382

00-43-00

00-14-00

388AP

386

387

385

392

00-21-00

391 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13414

212

00-13-00

Palas

395

Raigad Roha

Roha Vangani

Raigad

00-13-00

213

00-12-00

396

211

00-34-00

400

214

402AP

00-13-00

216

00-24-00

401 AP

215

00-25-00

130

Shetpalas

00-14-00

219/B

150

219/AP

131

(00-17-(0)

225

132

218

128

220

00-21-00

133

00-19-000

228

00-02-50

121

229

00-04-30

136

00-34-00

230/AP

134

231

122

261

00-22-00

119

(X)-07-( X)

258

117

257

00-12-00

116

( 00-04 )

256

00-25-00

113

264

200

201

( 0-12-00

266/AP

00-14-00

202

267

00-15-00

268

203

250

( 0-12-00

249

( X)-11-( X)

248

00-46-000

218

00-23-00

316

219

315

220

314

221

(X)-13-(X)

313

232

(X)-11-(X )

312

00-15-00

231

311

234

344

( 0-24-(X)

255

345

254

(X0002-( X)

343

264

341

(X)-24-00

265

(X0-22-00

342

(X0-20-00

266

346

(0-12-00

268

347

281

(X)(15- X)

348

00-16-00

280

01-20-00

Ghodsai 33

282

00-15-000

66/ JA

Tamsoli

00-36-00

286

287

JF. No. L- 14014/23/05 - G.P ]

(00-20-00

285

S.B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

13415 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2005

1031

0.01

मुरैना मुरैमा पहाडी

1032

0.14

1034

1043

0.04

1042

0.03

1039

0.03

1035

0.01

1038

0.04

0.66

1058

1037

0.01

1061

0.17

1062

0.02

1064

0.01 का.आ. 4639.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 881 ( अ ) तारीख 17-06-2005 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में कैलारस - मालनपुर स्पर पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से आर. एल. एन.जी. के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

1108

0.01

1107

0.14 और, उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 01-08-2005 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

1188

0.01

1189

0.06

0.05

1187

1190

0.06 और, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और उन्हें अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया है;

1179

0.02

1197

0.07

1196

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

1199

0.05

1200

0.11

1201

1206

0.12

0.05

1261

और, सक्षम प्रधिकारी ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित हैं, उस में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

1278

0.06

1208

0.02

1241

0.13

1243

1273

0.03

0.15

1254

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइने बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है।

0.41

1255म

1260म

0.24

1259

0.33

1262म

0.01

2422

0.39

0.2

2427

4.68

योग

0.10

बामोरकला 47म

0.01 और, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निदेश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए पाइपलाईनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार, इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।

46म

0.14

44म

0.30 अनुसूची

0.07 तहसील गाँव

सर्वे संख्या

जिला

0.08

41म

0.09

40म

आर.ओ.यू. के

लिएअर्जित क्षे.

(हैक्ट. में)

0.01

39म

0.11 1

122म

0.24 1028

0.18

मुरैना पहाडी

मुरैना

118

0.01 1029

0.13

117

0.06 1030

0.08

0.07

129म [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 13416

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

0.36

1690

0.09

महटोली

मुरैना

बामहेश्कलों 130

मुरैना

मुरैना मुरैना

0.09

1693

0.02

131

0.17

0.10

1638

133म

0.05

1629

0.04

106म

0.08

0.02 716

1630

0.08

1628

717

0.12

0.01 719

1627

0,16

718

0.04

1626

0.01

1625

0.31

0.20 776

1593

0.35

863म

0.08

1577

0.02

858

0.01

1576

0.09

928

0.07

1572

0.04

931म

0.03

1573

0.01

979म

0.13

1571

0.08

980円

0.03

1570

0.02

978

0.16

1568

0.04

961

0.02

1713

0.18

959

0,14

1718

0.03

957

0.02

1722

3.16

0.17 योग

1723

0.17

0.41

1768

778म

जयपुर उर्फ

0.01

1762

0.04

0.01 763म

1767

0.07

0.05 762म

1766

0.17

0.05 756円

1763

0.08

743म

0.11

1765

0,01

740

0.01

1756

0.09

741

0.18

1755

0.01

726

0.01

1777

0.09

724

0.03

1754

0.01

723

0.16

1779

0.05

725

0.05

1782

0.27

711

0.03

1785

0.01

710म

0.03

1783

0,04

709

0.09

1784

0.07

708

0.16

1781

0.03

707

0.24

1856

0.09

704

1855

0.01

0.46 703

0.07

1858

0.01

705

0.56

1859

0.24

702

0,19

2175

0.02

700

0.08

2174

0.37

698म

0.09

2155/2337

0.06

697

0.01

2154

0.01

459

0.04

2155

0.02

463

(0.04

0.01

2156

834म

0.02

0.18

2157

694म

(0.09

0.41

2141

693म

0.20

2131

691

0.01

0.01 692

2139

0.03

0.01

2140

690円

0.50

0.07 663

2132

(0.12

2128

3.62

योग 13417

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1 2

0.05

787

मुरैना पारोली

मुरैना

0.03

2126

मुरैना महटोली

मुरैना

0.16

788

0.28

2127

0.14

790

0.10

2087

0.27

791म

0.01

2084

0.18

803

0.13

2083

0.03

802

0.08

2053

0.15

801

0.07

2077

0.03

795म

0.13

2054

0.21

797

0.13

2055

1.22

योग

0.01

2056

0.64

पिपरसेवा 85

0.12

2050

0.10

2058

0.19

6.53

योग

0.93

योग

0.18

324

भाँखरी

0,80

471म

गडाजर

0.01

323

0.27

472

0.11

325

0,29

473 to476

0.20

326

0.14

1470 to 1471

0.01

327

0.73

1475म

0.38

319

0.30

1476म

0.09

318

0.20

1331/1 to 1331/2

0.08

316

2.73

योग

0.10

317

0.13

0.02

314

142

भटपुरा डाँग

0.01

0.02

141

298

0.02

144म

0.22

291 म

0.13

140म

0.11

289

0.13

139

0.02

288

0.05

148

0.15

200

0.18

134म

0.01

199

0.01

133

0.20

201

132

0.01

0.03

274म

0.05

130

0.01

272

0,24

131

0.12

273

0.02

120

0.07

220

0.02

124

0.1Ю

218

0.03

121म

0.02

221

0.06

122म

0.11

222

0.12

1234

0.01

223

0.15

194

0.10

227

0.22

196

0.01

229

0.01

198

0.20

226

0.01

195

0.13

234

0.04

199

0.09

235

0.02

200

0.01

255

0.01

201

0.04

238

0.17

0.01

254

0.01

0.19

241

0.14

214

0.01

0.19 239

212/ 1 म

0.07

0.31

213

242म

0.55

0.07

222

243

0.04

246

3.55

योग 13418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1

0.14 मुरैना भटपुरा डॉग 245

मुरैना

0.18 मुरैना

मुरैना रिठोरा कलाँ 3496

244

0.09

3495

0.08 302

0.09

3494

0.01 301

0.03

3492

0.06 301/402

0.09

3491

0.03 304

0.08

4305

0.07 306

0.04

3515

0.01 305

0.01

4304

0.02 309

0.06

4301

0.14 313

0.11

4300

0.01 316

0.03

0.04

4299

315

0.10

4295

0.26 329

0.10

4294

0,45 331

0.01

योग

3.47 334

0.11

0.35 335/2

0.06

बस्तपूर

335/1

0.05

26म

0.31 343

0.06

0,21

94म

348म

0.08

93 म

0.09

0.03

347म

0.11 349म

0.05

0.06 357म

0.10

0.06 359

0.21

181

0.01 364

0.06

180

0,09 363

0.01

179

0.11 365म

0.16

107

0.10 381 म

0,27

108

0.07

110/2

0.09 योग

5.11

110/3

0.10 ऐंती

1560

0.04

111

0.01 1552

0.01

114

0.01 1557

0.03

112

0.02 1559म

0.29

0.02

116

0.03

1558

117

0.18 योग

0.40

728

0.01

0.02

रिठोरा कलाँ 3405म

योग

2.01

0.09

3406/1/b

बडवारी 149

0,13

0.23

3406/1/c

150

0.06

3406/1 /g

153

0.01 3407/1/c

0.16

154

0.23

0.01

3406/1/m

157

0.10

0.08

3409/5

158

0.09 3409/8

0.08

162

0.09 3409/9

0.05

165

0.10

0.04

3409/10

166

0.01

0.14

3409/11

167

0.02 3454

0.10

179

3455

0.15

0.01

156

0.10 3461

0.14

168

0.08

0.13

3463म

3464म

0.19

0.03

172

3465

0.06

169

0.03 3476

0.06

171

0.04 3477म

211

0.11

0.03 3497

0.22

215

0.06 3500

0,03

216

0.07 13419 भारत का संजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2005 4

0.01

बडवारी 520

मुरैना

0.01

518

0.06

517

0.02

516

0.01

514

0.05

515

0.04

571

0.01

572

0.01

568

0,04

573

0.01

575

003

574

0.05

661

S.O. 4639 Whereasby notification of the Government of India ist the Ministry of Petroleum and NaturalGas number S. O. No.881 (E)dated 17-06-2005 issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act. 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transport of R - LNG through Kailaras Malunpur spur Ppiepline Project in the State of Uttar Pradesh by the GAIL ( India ) Limited:

0.01

662

0.01

674

0.02

673

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public from 01-08-2005;

0.01

676

0.02

677

0.01

665

0.10

671

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority:

(1.002

678

0.01

863

0.01

679

0.02

And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . submitted its report to the Central Governttient :

867

1.01

854

0.01

855

0.10

932

And whereas the Central Government . has , after considering (he said report decided to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule:

0.01

987

0.01

988

0.01

929

0.02

1409

0.11

1420

0.05

1422

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Scliedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipelines:

0.06

1423

0.05

1449

0.01

1440

0.06

1447

10.03

1446

0.03

1443

0.03

1444

0.02

1445

0.04

1357

And, further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said Jand for laying the pipelines shall , instead ofvesting in the Central Government , vest , on the date of the publication of the declaration , in the GAIL ( India ) Limited, free from all encumbrances .

0.15

1358/2

SCHEDULE

0.01

1385

Arca

0.02

1351

Survey No.

Village

Tehsil

District

0.01

tobe 1337

0.01

1336

acquired

0.11

1341

for ROU

0.08

1329

(InHectare)

0.05

1330

0.07

1324

0.18

1323

0.18

1028

Pahari

Morena

0.27

1613

0.13

1029

3.50

(0.08

1030

योग

0.01

1031

[फा. सं. एल-14014/14/05- जी.पी. ]

(0.14

11032

एस. बी. मण्डल, अवर सचिव

3423 G1/05-15 PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19. 1927

13420

0.02

131

Bamaur

Morena

0.14

1034

Pahari

Morena

0.10

133M

Kalan

0.04

1043

0.04

106M

-(Contd.)

0.03

1042

0.08

716

0.03

1039

0.08

717

0.01

1035

0.12

719

0.04

1038

0.16

718

0.66

1058

0.01

777

0.01

1037

0.31

776

0.17

1061

0.35

863M

0.02

1062

0.02

858

0.01

1064

0.09

928

0.01

1108

0.04

931M

(0.14

1107

0.01

979M

0.01

1188

0.08

980M

0.06

1189

0.02

978

0.05

1187

(0.004

961

0.06

1190

0.18

959

0.02

0.03 1179

957

0.07

1197

3.16

Total

0.07

1196

0.41

778M

Jaipur

0.05

1199

10,04

763M

Alias

0.05

1200

0.07

762M

Naya-

0.11

1201

0.17

756M

gaon

0.12

1206

0.08

743M

0.05

1161

0.01

740

0.06

1278

0.09

741

0.02.

1208

0.01

726

0.13

1241

0.09

724

0.13

1243

0.01

723

0.03

1273

0.05

725

0.15

1254

0.27

711

0.41

1255M

0.01

710M

0.24

1260M

0.004

709

0.33

1259

0.07

708

0.01

1262M

0.03

707

0.39

2422

0.09

704

0.21

2427

0.01

703

0.01

705

4.68

Total

0.24

702

0.10

47M

Bamaur

0.02.

700

0.01

Kalan 48

0.37

698M

0.14

46M

0.06

697

0,30

44M

0.01

459

(0.07

0.02

463

0.08

0.01

834M

0.09

41M

0.18

694M

0.01

40M

0.41

693M

0.11

0.20

691

0.24

122M

0.01

692

0.01

118

0.03

690M

0.06

117

0.50

663

0.07

129M

3.62

Total

0.09

130 13421 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.36

0.28 Mahatoli 1690

Mahatoli 2127

Morena Morena

Morena

0.09

1693

0.10

(Contd.)2087

1638

0.17

0.01

2084

0.05

1629

2083

0.13

0.02

1630

0.08

2053

0.08

1628

0.07

2077

1627

0.01

0.13

2054

1626

0.04

0.13

2055

0.01

1625

2056

0.01

0.20

1593

0.12

2050

0.08

1577

2058

0.10

0.01

1576

0.07

1572

6.53

Total

0.03

1573

0.18

Bhankari 324

0.13

1571

0.01

323

1570

0.03

325

0.11

0.16

1568

326

0.20

0.02

1713

327

0.01

0.14

1718

0.38

319

0.02

1722

0.09

318

0.17

1723

0.08

0.17

316

1768

0.01

0.10 1762

317

1767

0.01

0.02

314

0.05

1766

0.02

298

0.05

1763

0.22

291M 1765

0.11

289

1756

0.01

0.02

288

0.18

1755

0.15

200

0.01

1777

0.01

199

0.03

1754

0.20

201

0.16

1779

0.03

274M

0.05

1782

0.01

272

0.03

1785

0.12

273

0.03

1783

0.07

220

0.09

1784

0.10

0.16

218

1781

0.24

0.02 1856

221

0.46

1855

0.11

222

0.07

1858

223

0.01

0.56

1859

227

0.10 2175

0.19

229

0.01

0.08

2174

0.20

226

0.09

2155/2337

0.13

234

0.01

2154

235

(0.09

0.04

2155

0.01

255

0.04

2156

0.04

238

0.02

2157

0.01

254

0.09

2141

0.19

241

0.20

2131

0.01

239

2139

0.31

242M

0.01

2140

0.07

0.07 2132

243

0.12

2128

3.55

Total

0.03

2126 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13422

0,09

0.05

Morena

787

302

Bhatpura

Paroli

Morena

0.03

301

0.16

Dang

788

0.09

301/402

0.14

790

0.08

304

0.27

791M

0.04

306

0.18

803

0.01

305

0.03

802

0.06

309

0.15

801

0.11

0.03

313

795M

0.03

0.21

316

797

0,10

315

1.22

Total

0.10

329

0.64

Piparsewa 85

0.01

331

0.10

0.11

334

0.19

0.06

335/2

0.93

Total

0.05

335/1

0.06

0.80

343

471M

Garajar

0.08

(0.27

348M 472

0.03

347M

0.29

473 to476

0.14

0.05

349M 1470 to 1471

0,73

0.10

357M 1475M

0.30

0.21 1476M

359

0.06

1331/2 0,20

364

1331/1 to

0.01

363

2.73

Total

0.16

365M

0.13

Bhatpura 142

(0.27

381M

0.01

141

Dang

5.11

Total

0.02

144M

0.13

140M

0.04

1560

Ainti

0,13

139

1552

0.01

0.05

0.03 148

1557

0.18

134M

0.29

1559M

0.01

133

0.03

1558

0.01

132

(0.40

Total

0.05

130

0.02

3405M

Rithora-

0.24

131

(00)

3406/1/b

kalan

0.02

120

0.23

3406/ 1/c

0.02

124

0.06

0.03

3406/ 1/g

121M

0.16

3407/1/c

0.06

122M

0.01

3406/1/m

0.12

123M

0.08

3409/5

0.15

194

0.08

3409/8

0,22

196

0.05

3409/9

0.01

198

0.04

3409/10

0.01

195

0.14

0.04

3409/11

199

(0.10

0.02

3454 200

0.15

0.01

3455 201

0.14

0.17

3461

92、

0.13

3463M

0.01

0.19

3464M

0.14

214

0.19

0.06

3465

212/ IM

0.07

0.06

213

3476

0.55

0.11

222

3477M

0.04

0.22

246

3497

0.18

245

0.03

3500

0.09

244

0.14

3496 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13423

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

0.08

Rithora- 3495

kalan 3494

0.01

0.06

(Contd.) 3492

0.03

3491 .

4305

0.07

3515

0.01

0.02

4304

4301

0.14

0.01

4300

4299

0.04

4295

0.26

4294

0.45

3.47

Total

0.35

Bastpur 25

26M

0.31

94M

0.21

93M

0.09

0.11

0.06

0.01

181

180

0.09

179

0.11

107

0.10

0.07

108

0.09

110/2

0.10

110/3

0.01

111

0,01

114

0.02

112

116

0.02

117

0.18

728

0.01

Total

2.01

0.13

Barwari 149

0.06

150

153

0.01

0,23

154

0.10

157

158

0.09

162

0,09

0.10

165

0.01

166

167

0.02

0.01

179

0.10

156

0.08

168

172

0.03

169

171

0.04

0.03

211

215

0.06

216

0.07

520

0.01

0.01 Barwari 518

0.06

517

516

0.02

514

0.01

0.05

515

0.04

571

0.01

572

568

0.01

573

0.04

575

0.01

0.03

574

0.05

661

662

0.01

674

0.01

673

0.02

676

0.01

677

0.02

665

0.01

671

0,10

678

0.02

0.01

863

679

0.01

867

0.02

854

0.01

855

0.01

932

0.10

987

0,01

0.01

988

0.01

929

0.02

1409

0.11

1420

0.05

1422

0.06

1423

0.05

1449

0.01

1440

0.06

1447

0.03

1446

0.03

1443

0.03

1444

0.02

1445

0.04

1357

0.15

1358/2

1385

0.01

1351

0.02

0.01

1337

1336

0.01

1341

0.11

0.08

1329

1330

0.05

0.07

1324

(0.18

1323

0.27

1613

Total

3.50 [F. No. L - 14014/11/05 -G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

13424

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYAN 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4640.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड है , के गोवो के उत्तरी/ दक्षिणी अपतट ऑफसोर के खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओं से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य में , नलगोंडा जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपजाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अध्धि सूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और ख्। निज पाइपलाइन ( भूमिं में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन अछि। नियम् 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिधकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधि। सूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भभीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिधकार के अर्जन के लिए श्री पी . बुच्चारेडडी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , 403 , ' सी' एवरेस्ट ब्लाक , आदित्या एन्कलेव , अमीरपेट , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य पिन 500 038 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूचि

आर ओ यू अर्जित करने के लिए श्रेत्रफल

सर्वे सं . /सब डिविजन सं .

गांव का नाम

एर

सिएर

हेक्टर

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

जिल्ला: नलगोंडा

मंडल:मोते

235*

1 ) नामावरम्

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

जिल्ला: नलगोंडा

मंडल:सूर्यापेट

47*

1) वेंकटरामापुरम्

* का.आ. 1836 , दिनांक: 01-07-2003 व्दारा पी.एम.पी. ऐक्ट , 1962 की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्र्तगत सूचित किये गये सर्वे नंवर । इस प्रतिपादन नया विस्तीर्ण केलिए।

[फा. सं. एल-14014/ 25/2003-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मंडल, अवर सचिव 13425 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 6th December, 2005

S. O. 4640.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from the exploration blocks in the Northern/Southern Offshore of Goa and Structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited , the promoter Company of M/ s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of Nalgonda District in the State of Andhra Pradesh , Pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said Pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( I) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri P. Butcha Reddy, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited, Pipeline Project , 403 , ' C'- Everest Block, Aditya Enclave , Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh , Pin -500 038 .

Schedule

State: Andhra Pradesh

District : Nalgonda

Mandal : Mothey

Area to be acquired for ROU

Survey No./Sub-Division No.

Village

C-Are

Hectare Are

235*

1. Namavaram

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Mandal: Suryapet

47*

1.Venkataramapuram

Survey Nos . notified vide S.O. 1836 dated 01-07-2003 u/s 3 ( 1 ) of P & MP Act 1962. Present propasal is for additional extents .

[F. No. L-14014/25/2003-G.P. ]

S. B. MANDAL , Under Secy.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 13426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4641.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1915 तारीख 27 मई, 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 28 मई, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में लोणी (पुणे) से पकनी (सोलापुर) तक हजाखाडी के रास्ते पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुम्बई- पुणे विस्तार पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 2 अगस्त, 2005 , को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सातारा

तालुका: खंडाला

क्षेत्रफल

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गाव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

उप-खण्ड संख्या

कम सं.

6 7

00 03

531

1 पिंपरे बु .

00 00 61

521

00 02 11

520

06 11

कुल [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13427

भारते का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सातारा

तालुका : खंडाला

गट नंबर

सर्वे नंबर

गांध कामाम

कंम सं .

543 2 बावकलवाडी

542

540

538

532

124

125

138

139

142

149

87 3 मरीआईची वाडी

172

169

158

159

162

321

4 लोणंद

337

345

167 5 बालूपाटलाची वाडी

157 3423 G1/05-16

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड संख्या हेक्टर एयर वर्ग मीटर

6 7

00 20 00

50 00 02

00 01 24

02 84 00

74 00 01

14 00 01

00 00 35 00 02 01

कुल

02 79

00 02 72

7.1

00 01

00 01 68

00 02 63

00 13 23 कुल

03 35

02 41

01 09

00 06

कुल

00 01 25

00 00 89

00 02 14 कुल

[फा. सं. आर-31015/31/2004 - ओ.आर-II ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिव [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13428

New Delhi , the 8th December, 2005

S. O. 4641.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1915, dated the 27th May, 2005, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 28th May, 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai - Pune Pipeline Extension Project from Loni (Pune ) to Pakni (Solapur) (via Hazarwadi ) in the State of Maharashtra by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 2nd

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

Andwhereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the rightof user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central . Govemment, vest on the date of publication of this declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State : MAHARASHTRA

District : SATARA

Taluka : KHANDALA

Area

GatNo.

Sub -Division No.

Survey No.

Sq.mt

Are

Hectare Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

7 8

00 03 39

531

1 PIMPRE BK .

521

00 02 11

520

00 06 11

Total [ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

13429

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

District : SATARA Taluka : KHANDALA

GatNo.

Survey No.

Sr. No.

Nameof the Village

4 1

543 2 BAVKALWADI

542

540

538

532

124

125

138

139

142

149 3 MARIAICHIWADI

193

172

169

158

159

162 4 LONAND

321

337

345

167 5 BALUPATLACHI WADI

157 State : MAHARASHTRA

Area

Sub-Division No.

Are Sq.mt Hectare

7 8 5

00 20

00 02 50

00 01 24

00 02 84

00 01 74

00 30

00 01 14

00 35

00 02 01

13 32

Total

00 02

00 02 72

00 00 71

00 00 62

00 00 47

00 01 21

00 00 40

00 01 68

00 02 63

00 13 23 Total

00 03 35

00 02

00 01 09

00 06 85 Total

00 01 25

00 00 89

00 02 14 Total

[No. R-31015/31/2004-O.R. -II ] HARISH KUMAR , Under Secy.

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13430

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ.4642.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2672 तारीख 28 जुलाई, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 30 जुलाई , 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी. द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में ब्रिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई- मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 08 सितंबर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है:

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्त्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिदिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ,

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए. यह निदेश देती है.कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख की केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: भरतपुर वहसील: बयाना

सर्वे नंबर

ग्राम का नाम

क ०

3 1

461

2 संतोक्रपुरा

1 .

457

458

459

478

476

477

479

482

738

737

736

725

723

498

724

500

502

503

504

505

506

507

511

508

512

524

523

522

517

518

519

185

184

181

179

180

178

169

170

167

171

166

168

124

118

1029

462

516 राज्य राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

0.0621

0.1440

0.0962

0.0216

0.0020

0.0017

0.0216

0.1296

0.2232

00708

0.0718

0.0503

0.0216

0.0792

0.0110

0.0010

0.0433

0.0144

0.0621

0.0154

0.0762

0.0820

0.0072

0.1080

0.0772

0.0144

0.1368

0.0858

0.0059

0.0072

0.0209

0.0020

0.0360

0.0404

0.0360

0.0576

0.1008

0.0040

0.0204

0.1080

0.0648

0.0720

0.1391

0.0072

0.1152

0.1086

0.0108

0.0144

0.0322

0.0200 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

173

संतोकपुरा (जारी....)

सिकंदरा

844

836

838

837

817

795

796

797

934

935

944

914

915

912

912/2992

891-

911

910

909

908

898

897

893

894

895

965/2996

880

883

884

882

877

876

872

863

862

861

856

857

855

842

845

790

778

788

775

776

779

777

780

383

385

384

381

408

404

405

401

442

447

448

449

451

460

461

462

463

464

467

468

474

475

492

495

496

497

515

516

13431 4

0.0100

0.0719

0.0144

0.0792

0.0576

0.1008

0.0288

0.0100

0.1241

0.0216

0.0144

0.0864

0.0360

0.0216

0:0072

0.0156

0.0540

0.0288

0.0360

0.0936

0.0150

0.0288

0.0360

0.0792

0.0540

0.0020

0.0400

0.0216

0.0432

0.0020

0.1440

0.0324

0.0504

0.0216

0,0504

0.0504

0.0010

0.0648

0.0864

0.0072

0.1440

0.2016

0.0020

0.1944

0.0072

0,0600

0.0504

0.0266

0.0072

0.0180

0.0108

0.1626

0.0030

0.0612

0.0336

0.0576

0.0778

0.0615

0.0030

0.0936

0.0030

0.1216

0.0040

0.0360

0.0306

0.0989

0.0040

0.0360

0.0931

0.1020

0.0040

0.0038

0.0855

0.0700

0.0386

0.0020

0.1103 13432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

सिकंदरा (जारी....)

514

0.1008

513

0.0040

533

0.1203

535

0.1316

541

0.0034

539

0.0026

540

0.0832

493

0.0950

517

0.0020

470

0.0010

बॉसरोली

728

0.0252

743

0.0152

744

0.0072

864

0.0216

863

0.0504

862

0.0360

861

0.0288

860

0,0360

859

0.0360

0.0432

858

0.0720

897

896

0,0432

0.0020

898

0.1080

895

893

0.0720

906

0.0360

0.0040

905

0.0792

908

907

0.0144

909

0.0040

[फा० स०आर०-31015/79/2004 ओ आर -11 ]

हरीश कुमार, अवर सचिय

New Delhi , the 8th December, 2005

S.O. 4642.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.2672, dated the 28th July , 2005 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) published in the Gazette of India dated the 30th July, 2005. the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an extension pipeline for transportatinn of petroleum products through Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Mangiya ( Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited:

And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 8th September , 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has . under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government . after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule . appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall . instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .

Tehsil: Bayana

State: Rajasthan

SCHEDULE

District: Bharatpur

S.No

Name of Village

Area in Hectare

SurveyNo.

2 SANTOKPURA

461

0.0621

457

0.1440,

458

0.0962

459

0.0216 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii) ] .

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

478 SANTOKPURA ( Contd.... )

476

477

479

482

738

737

736

725

723

498

724

500

502

503

504

505

506

507

511

508

512

524

523

522

517

518

519

185

184

181

179

180

178

169

170

167

171

166

168

124

118

1029

462

516

173 2

SIKANDRA

844

836

838

837

817

795

796

797

934

935

944

914

915

912

912/2992

891

911

910

909

908

898

897

893

894

895

965/2996

880

883

884

882

877

13433 4

0.0020

0.0017

0.0216

0.1296

0.2232

0.0708

0.0718

0.0503

0.0216

0.0792

0.0110

0.0010

0.0433

0.0144

0.0621

0.0154

0.0762

0.0820

0.0072

0.1080

0.0772

0.0144

0.1368

0.0858

0.0059

0.0072

0.0209

0.0020

0.0360

0.0404

0.0360

0.0576

0.1008

0.0040

0.0204

0.1080

0.0648

0.0720

0.1391

0.0072

0.1152

0.1086

0.0108

0.0144

0.0322

0.0200

0.0100

0.0719

0.0144

0.0792

0.0576

0.1008

0.0288

0.0100

0.1241

0.0216

0.0144

0.0864

0.0360

0.0216

0.0072

0.0156

0.0540

0.0288

0.0360 0.0936

0.0150

0.0288

0.0360

0.0792

0.0540

0.0020

0.0400

0.0216

0.0432

0.0020

0.1440

0.0324 13434

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19 , 1927

876 SIKANDRA(Contd....)

872

863

862

861.

856

857

855

842

845

790

778

788

775

776

779

777

780

383

385

384

381

408

404

405

401

442

447

448

449

451

460

461

462

463

464

467

468

474

475

492

495

496

497

515

516

514

513

533

535

541

539

540

493

517

470 3

BANSROLI

728

743

744

864

863

862

861

860

859

858

897

896

898

895

893

906

905

908

907

909

0.0504

0.0216

0.0504

0.0010

0.0648

0.0864

0.0072

0,1440

0.2016

0.0020

0.1944

0.0072

0.0600

0.0504

0.0266

0.0072

0.0180

0.0108

0.1626

0.0030

0.0612

0.0336

0.0576

0.0778

0.0615

0.0030

0:0936

0.0030

0.1216

0.0040

0.0360

0.0306

0.0989

0.0040

0.0360

0.0931

0.1020

0.0040

0.0038

0.0855

0.0700

0.0386

0.0020

0.1103

0.1008

0.0040

0.1203

0.1316

0.0034

0.0026

0.0832

0.0950

0.0020

0.0010

0.0252

0.0152

0,0072

0.0216

0.0504 0.0360

0.0288

0.0360 0.0360

0.0432

0.0720

0.0432

0.0020

0,1080

0.0720

0.0360

0.0040

0,0792

0.0144.

0.0040

[ F.N.R -31015 /79/2004 - OR - II ]

HARISH KUMAR , UNDER SECRETARY भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13435

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आा. 4643.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के, पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 3132 तारीख 30 अगस्त, 2005 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 3 सितम्बर , 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई-मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 10 अक्टूबर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है क्रि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: कोटा

सर्वे नम्बर तहसील: लाडपुरा क्र० ग्राम का नाम

3 2

749 गलाना

750

746

747

744

745/859

742

743

741

740

730

728

727

720

721

717

714

716

715

687

605

686

618

619

626

620

621

681

680

677

673

676

674

648

668 3423 G1/05-17

राज्य: राजस्थान क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

0.0360

0.0650

0.1230

0.1730

0.3100

0.1370

0.2170

0.2100

0.0290

0.0080

0.2740

0.1370

0.0360

0.2520

0.2610

0.0220

0.2900

0.0080

0.1520

0.2020

0.1450

0.1010

0.1370

0.0290

0.0080

0.3030

0.2450

0.0150

0.2020

0.2450

0.0020

0.2020

0.1450

0.0940 13436

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19 , 1927

3 2

649 गलाना (जारी......)

660

652

659

658

435 2 कादीहेड़ा

434

430

431

426

426/538

425

406

407

362

361

167

166

169

168

185

183

182

184

181

137

116

115

114

102

101

103

100

2 3

260/987 जाखोड़ा

260

261

259

262

257

256

255

247

246

241

242

237

225 4

0.1590

0.1370

0.0220

0.3030

0.0220

0.1660

0.0720

0.2520

0.2160

0.0150

0.2310

0.0040

0.4550

0.1370

0.0220

0.0290

0.0650

0.0040

0.0150

0.0220

0.1370

0.1300

0.0020

0.0580

0.0220

0.0290

0.0440

0.0360

0.0080

0.1160

0.1080

0.0150

0.0220

0.0150

0.0040

0.3100

0.0580

0.0440

0.0290

0.0220

0.2310

0.0220

0.2100

0.2600

0.0220

0.3960

0.0290

0.0360

0.2390

0.0730

0.0020

0.3250

0.0150

0.2170

0.0040

0.1375

0.2170

0.0440

0.1735

0.0150 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

13437

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

222 3 जाखोड़ा (जारी....)

216

216/996

214

213

211

338 4 किशनपुरा (केथून)

339

340

337

322

324

323

264

267

269

273

274

272

277

282

280 5 गोदलियाहेड़ी

468

470

469

466

465

472

464

463

453

452

451

450

436

449

300

299

301

278

279

269

268

217

218

215

221

198

179

180

182

183

166

165

151

152

153 6 मोरपा

274

272/372

273

272

267

266 4

0.0080

0.2460

0.1950

0.1590

0.0800

0.0040

0.0290

0.1730

0.1230

0.2100

0.0150

0.3980

0.0940

0.0290

0.1730

0.0360

0.0440

0.0940

0.0080

0.0290

0.0220

0.1520

0.0360

0.1665

0.0220

0.1520

0.0150

0.1880

0.1450

0.0290

0.1800

0.0290

0.0360

0.0800

0.0360

0.0220

0.3320

0.1160

0.4040

0.1590

0.1880

0.0220

0.2240

0.0650

0.1300

0.1730

0.0220

0.0510

0.0580

0.1660

0.1230

0.1800

0.0150

0.1730

0.1950

0.1160

0.2600

0.0290

0.0730

0.0150

0.1300

0.2310

0.0080 [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13438

3 2

266/434 6 मोरपा (जारी...)

268

265

262

261

260

253

234

236

252

237

246

246/403

246/402

241

242

244

243

214

220

217

217/453

272 अरनिया

269

271

270

265

212

263

209

191

192

200

193/402

195

194

181

175

174

135

136

142

141

140

145

147

156

147/383

154

153

27 रसूलपुर

824 ताथेड़

825

822 4

0.0080

0.0800

0.0290

0.2530

0.0150

0.2890

0.0440

0.0150

0.1450

0.0380

0.2160

0.1730

0.0080

0.0290

0.1590

0.0650

0.0360

0.0290

0.1160

0.3470

0.0290

0.0360

0.0290

0.0080

0.0510

0.2600

0.3460

0.1100

0.0220

0.0360

0.0080

0.0940

0.2020

0.0800

0.1300

0.0290

0.1450

0.1100

0.0220

0.1010

0.0150

0.0650

0.2100

0.3030

0.1100

0.1880

0.2100

0.0020

0.2310

0.1800

0.0510

0.0440

0.0940

0.1450

0.0580

0.0020

0.1300

0.1100

0.0290

0.0580

0.1300

0.1600 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

13439

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

3 9

777 ताधेड़ (जारी....)

774

773

772

771

770

770/870/928

770/870

541 10 बृजेशपुरा

540

534

536

535

529

520

477

476

479

481

482

475

474

482/547

483

520

461

465

466

487

459

450

451

453

454

455

456

457

411

410

409

386

385

380

349

347

346

276

275

273

274

271

270

284

266

215

216

217

218

219

220

209

210

30 4

0.3170

0.2600

0.3030

0.0020

0.6280

0.0580

0.0020

0.0220

0.3250

0.0940

0.0440

0.1300

0.2600

0.0220

0.1010

0.0580

0.0020

0.0650

0.0440

0.0020

0.0360

0.0290

0.0150

0.3030

0.0150

0.1160

0.0080

0.0150

0.1370

0.1180

0.0940

0.0360

0.0040

0.0290

0.0440

0.0360

0.0220

0.1160

0.1450

0.0040

0.0360

0.2520

0.0150

0.1450

0.0080

0.0150

0.0650

0.0720

0.0080

0.1370

0.0360

0.0440

0.0360

0.0220

0.0040

0.1450

0.0080

0.1180 13440

[PART I- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

24 10 बृजेशपुरा (जारी)

255/271 11 पिपल्दा शेखान

255

256

257

254

253

330 12 रामखेड़ली

329

328

327

295

296

291

292

293

280

276

277

278

279

273

268

289

270

266

271

271/365

265

.213

210

211

212

185

183

184

188/380

174

173

172

160

162/379

162

152

151

148

149

150/340

150

58/377

1/374

210 13 नोटाना

0.1880

0.0290

0.0040

0.0290

0.0510

0.2670

0.0870

0.1660

0.0360

0.0290

0.0150

0.1800

0.1450

0.0150

0.0510

0.2160

0.0220

0.0040

0.0510

0.0290

0.0650

0.0080

0.0440

0.1450

0.0560

0.2240

0.1450

0.0020

0.0510

0.0360

0.0510

0.0290

0.0650

0.1590

0.1100

0.0650

0.2050

0.1300

0.0040

0.2800

0.0650

0.0150

0.0440

0.0290

0.0360

0.0560

0.3470

0.0040

0.0510

0.0080

0.0510

0.0150

0.0800

0.0440

0.0650

0.0940

0.0150

0.0580

0.1880

0.0080

0.1100

0.0720 13441

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 2

209 13 नोटाना (जारी.....)

208

207

206

204

720

719

721

722

723

717

715

716

705

894

693

691

687

2281 14 चन्द्रेसल

2279

2277

2276

2269

36.1

362

2220

2211

2210

2151

2150

2149

2146

2145

2143

2142

2140

2138

2137

2136

2135

270 15 देवली मच्छियान

531

527

526

525

524

520

519

512

508

509

510

511

513

505

97 16 किशनपुरा उर्फ नयागांव

94/524

95/474 4

0.0080

0.0150

0.0220

0.1880

0.3970

0.1520

0.0080

0.2020

0.1950

0.2310

0.0290

0.0360

0.1950

0.1450

0.0720

0.1370

0.4040

0.1800

0.0580

0.1450

0.0360

0.3460

0.0220

0.0080

0.0440

0.0080

0.4040

0.0510

0.0150

0.0080

0.0440

0.0220

0.2670

0.0800

0.0510

0.0440

0.0940

0.1180

0.0360

0.1010

0.1450

0.1730

0.0360

0.0080

0.0650

0.0080

0.1950

0.0080

0.0150

0.1950

0.2520

0.0510

0.2520

0.0360

0.0150

0.2310

0.0080

0.0150

0.0440 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13442

3 2

52 16 किशनपुरा उर्फ नवागांव (जारी...)

775

776

774

772

768

767

769

765

764

759

753

752

637 बावडी

636

635

634

611

612

609

606

594

593

595

596

597

598

776

769

768

767

716

710

711

712

685

684

683

682

681

680

679

665

293

292

147

146

145

144

143

142

141

139

140

129

130

132

71 17

मावड़ी(जारी...)

0.3030

0.0360

0.0080

0.3900

0.1880

0.2740

0.0290

0.0720

0.3030

0.0290

0.1230

0.1160

0.0720

0.0290

0.1590

0.1800

0.0290

0.0580

0.3390

0.0580

0.0080

0.0940

0.3250

0.0360

0.0150

0.1950

0.1010

0.1800

0.2360

0.0290

0.1660

0.0360

0.1450

0.1520

0.2880

0.0440

0.0940

0.1730

0.0510

0.0290

0.1010

0.0940

0.0650

0.0290

0.0150

0.0510

0.0440

0.1450

0.1160

0.1590

0.0800

0.0440

0.0080

0.0510

0.0360

0.0720

0.0440

0.1520

0.1370

0.0650

0.4400

[फा०सं०आर०-31015/8 / 2004-ओ आर-11] हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव 13443

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 8th December, 2005

S. O. 4643. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.3132, dated 30 August , 2005, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) published in the Gazette of India dated the 3rd September, 2005, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai - Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in, the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 10th October , 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has, under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE TEHSIL: LADPURA

DISTRICT: KOTA SURVEY NO .

NAME OF VILLAGE

S.No.

3 2

749 GALANA

750

748

747

744

745/859

742

743

741

740

730

728

727

720

721

717

714

716

715

687

605

686

618

619

626

620

621

681

680

677

673

676

674

648

668 3423 GJ/05-18

STATE : RAJASTHAN AREA IN HECTARE

0.0360

0.0650

0.1230

0.1730

0.3100

0.1370

0.2170

0.2100

0.0290

0.0080

0.2740

0,1370

0,0360

0.2520

0.2810

0.0220

0.2900

0.0080

0.1520

0.2020

0.1450

0.1010

0.1370

0.0290

0.0080

0.3030

0.2450

0.0150

0.2020

0.2450

0.0020

0.2020

0.1450

0.0940 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13444

3 2

649 GALANA ( Contd .... )

660

652

659

658

435 KADIHEDA

434

430

431

426

426/538

425

406

407

362

361

167

166

169

168

185

183

182

184

181

137

116

115

114

102

101

103

100

4362

260/987 3

JAKHODA

260

261

259

262

257

256

255

247

246

241

242

237

225 4

0.1590

0.1370

0.0220

0.3030

0.0220

0.1660

0.0720

0.2520

0.2160

0.0150

0.2310

0.0040

0.4550

0.1370

0.0220

0.0290

0.0650

0.0040

0.0150

0.0220

0.1370

0.1300

0.0020

0.0580

0.0220

0.0290

0.0440

0.0360

0.0080

0.1160

0.1080

0.0150

0.0220

0.0150

0.0040

0.3100

0.0580

0.0440

0.0290

0.0220

0.2310

0.0220

0.2100

0.2600

0.0220

0.3960

0.0290

0.0360

0.2390

0.0730

0.0020

0.3250

0.0150

0.2170

0.0040

0.1375

0.2170

0.0440

0.1735

0.0150 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/ अग्रहायण 19 , 1927 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3 2

222 3 JAKHODA( Cond ... )

216

216/996

214

213

211

338 KISHANPURA ( KETHUN)

339

340

337

322

324

323

264

267

269

273

274

272

27.7

282

280

468 5 GODALIYAHEDI

470

469

466

465

472

464

463

453

452

451

450

436

449

300

299

301

278

279

269

268

217

218

215

221

198

179

180

182

183

166

165

151

152

153

274 6 MORPA

272/372

273

272

267

266

13445 4

0.0080

0.2460

0.1950

0.1590

0.0800

0.0040

0.0290

0.1730

0.1230

0.2100

0.0150

0.3980

0.0940

0.0290

0.1730

0.0360

0.0440

0.0940

0.0080

0.0290

0.0220

0.1520

0.0360

0.1665

0.0220

0.1520

0.0150

0.1880

0.1450

0.0290

0.1800

0.0290

0.0360

0.0800

0.0360

0.0220

0.3320

0.1160

0.4040

0.1590

0.1880

0.0220

0.2240

0.0650

0.1300

0.1730

0.0220

0.0510

0.0580

0.1660

0.1230

0.1800

0.0150

0.1730

0.1950

0.1160

0.2600

0.0290

0.0730

0.0150

0.1300

0.2310

0.0080 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13446

3 2

266/434 6 MORPA(Contd... )

268

265

262

261

260

253

234

236

252

237

246

246/403

246/402

241

242

244

243

214

220

217

217/453

272 ARNIYA

269

271

270

265

212

263

209

191

192

200

193/402

195

194

181

175

174

135

136

142

141

140

145

147

156

147/383

154

153

27 8

RASULPUR

824 TATHED

825

822 4

0.0060

0.0800

0.0290

0.2530

0.0150

0.2890

0.0440

0.0150

0.1450

0.0360

0.2160

0.1730

0.0080

0.0060

0.0290

0.1590

0.0650

0.0360

0.0290

0.1160

0.3470

0.0290

0.0360

0.0290

0,0080

0.0510

0.2600

0.3460

0.1100

0.0220

0.0360

0.0080

0.0940

0.2020

0.0800

0.1300

0.0290

0.1450

0.1100

0.0220

0.1010

0.0150

0.0650

0.2100

0.3030

0.1100

0.1880

0.2100

0.0020

0.2310

0.1800

0.0510

0.0440

0.0940

0.1450

0.0560

0.0020

0.1300

0.1100

0.0290

0.0560

0.1300

0.1600 13447

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3 2

777 TATHED (Contd.... )

774

773

772

771

770

770/870/928

770/870

541 10 BRAJESHPURA

540

534

536

535

529

520

477

476

479

461

482

475

474

482/547

483

520

461

465

466

467

459

450

451

453

454

455

456

457

411

410

409

386

385

380

349

347

346

276

275

273

274

271

270

284

266

215

216

217

218

219

220

209

210

30 4

0.3170

0.2600

0.3030

0.0020

0.6280

0.0580

0.0020

0.0220

0.3250

0.0940

0.0440

0.1300

0.2600

0.0220

0.1010

0.0580

0.0020

0.0650

0.0440

0.0020

0.0360

0.0290

0.0150

0.3030

0.0150

0.1160

0.0080

0.0150

0.1370

0.1160

0.0940

0.0360

0.0040

0.0290

0.0440

0.0360

0.0220

0.1160

0.1450

0.0040

0.0360

0.2520

0.0150

0.1450

0.0080

0.0150

0.0650

0.0720

0.0080

0.1370

0.0360

0.0440

0.0360

0.0220

0.0040

0.1450

0.0080

0.1160 13448

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

3 1

24 BRAJESHPURA (Contd ... )

255/271 11 PIPALDA SHEKHAN

255

256

257

254

253

330 12 RAMKHEDLI

329

328

327

295

296

291

292

293

280

276

277

278

279

273

268

289

270

266

271

271/365

265

213

210

211

212

185

183

184

188/380

174

173

172

180

162/379

162

152

151

148

149

150/340

150

58/377

1/374 13

210 NOTANA

0.1880

0.0290

0.0040

0.0290

0.0510

0.2670

0.0870

0.1660

0.0360

0.0290

0.0150

0.1800

0.1450

0.0150

0.0510

0.2160

0.0220

0.0040

0.0510

0.0290

0.0650

0.0080

0.0440

0.1450

0.0580

0.2240

0.1450

0.0020

0.0510

0.0360

0.0510

0.0290

0.0650

0.1590

0.1100

0.0650

0.2050

0.1300

0.0040

0.2600

0.0650

0.0150

0.0440

0.0290

0.0360

0.0580

0.3470

0.0040

0.0510

0.0080

0.0510

0.0150

0.0800

0.0440

0.0650

0.0940

0.0150

0.0580

0.1880

0.0080

0.1100

0.0720 13449

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

209 13 NOTANA ( Contd ... )

208

207

206

204

720

719

721

722

723

717

715

716

705

694

693

691

687

2281 14 CHANDRESAL

2279

2277

2278

2269

361

362

2220-

2211

2210

2151

2150

2149

2146

2145

2143

2142

2140

2138

2137

2136

2135

270 15 DEVLI MACHHIYAN

531

527

526

525

524

520

519

512

508

509

510

511

513

505

97 16 KISHANPURA URF NAYAGAON

94/524

95/474 4

0.0080

0.0150

0.0220

0.1880

0.3970

0.1520

0.0080

0.2020

0.1950

0.2310

0.0290

0.0360

0.1950

0.1450

0.0720

0.1370

0.4040

0.1800

0.0580

0.1450

0.0360

0.3460

0.0220

0.0080

0.0440

0.0080

0.4040

0.0510

0.0150

0.0080

0.0440

0.0220

0.2670

0.0800

0.0510

0.0440

0.0940

0.1160

0.0360

0.1010

0.1450

0.1730

0.0360

0.0080

0.0650

0.0080

0.1950

0.0080

0.0150

0.1950

0.2520

0.0510

0.2520

0.0360

0.0150

0.2310

0.0080

0.0150

0.0440 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

13450

3 2

52 KISHANPURA URF NAYAGAON

51 (Contd....)

775

776

774

772

768

767

769

765

764

759

753

752

637 GAWDI

636

635

634

611

612

609

606

594

593

595

596

597

598

776

769

768

767

716

710

711

712

685

684

683

682

681

680

679

665

293

292

147

146

145

144

143

142

141

139

140

129

130

132

0.3030

0.0360

0.0080

0.3900

0.1880

0.2740

0.0290

0.0720

0.3030

0.0290

0.1230

0.1160

0.0720

0.0290

0.1590

0.1800

0.0290

0.0580

0.3390

0.0580

0.0080

0.0940

0.3250

0.0360

0.0150

0.1950

0.1010

0.1800

0,2380

0.0290

0.1660

0.0360

0.1450

0.1520

0.2880

0.0440

0.0940

0.1730

0.0510

0.0290

0.1010

0.0940

0.0650

0.0290

0.0150

0.0510

0.0440

0.1450

0.1160

0.1590

0.0800

0.0440

0.0080

0.0510

0.0360

0.0720

0.0440

0.1520

0.1370

0.0650

0.4400

[ F.N. R- 31015/ 8 /2004 -OR - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secretary 13451

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4644.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1982 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 631 तारीख 21 फरवरी, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 26 फरवरी , 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या (इंदौर) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुंबई- मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 25 अप्रैल, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने . उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिदिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

राज्य: राजस्थान

अनुसूची

जिला: सवाई माधोपुर

तहसील: मलारला हूँगर

सर्वे नंबर क्र० ग्राम कानाम

3 1 2

282 1 मक्सूदनपुरा

283

281

289

290

291

222

223

220

212

218

217

218

300

125

301

302

308

311

359

355

356

357

361

362

371

377

375

374

373

426

427

428

429

440

439

442

441

443

447

430

438 3423 GI/06-19

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

0.1440

0.0720

0.0050

0.1872

0.1440

0.0917

0.2376

0.0912

0.1224

0.0735

0.1656

0.1800

0.1656

0.0050

0.0288

0.0720

0.3744

0.0050

0.2088

0.1153

0.1152

0.0720

0.0864

0.1485

0.2160

0.0216

0.0050

0.0504

0.3312

0.1080

0.0050

0.1512

0.1028

0.1296

0.2304

0.0072

0.0360

0.0864

0.0072

0.0288

0.0144

[फा०सं०आर०-31015/88 /2004-ओ आर-II ] हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव, भारत सरकार 13452

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

New Delhi , the 9th December, 2005

S. O. 4644.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.631 , dated the 21 February, 2005, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962(50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) published in the Gazette of India dated the 26th February, 2005, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying an extension pipeline for trarisportation of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore ) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 25th April , 2005;

And whereas the competent authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has deeided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in said land, specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , inBharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

DISTRICT : SAWAI MADHOPUR

SURVEY NO. TEHSIL : MALARNA DUNGAR S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

3 2

282 MAKSUDANPURA

283

281

289

290

291

222

223

220

212

218

217

216

300

125

301

302

308

311

359

355

356

357

361

362

371

377

375

374

373

426

427

428

429

440

439

442

441

443

447

430

438 STATE : RAJASTHAN AREA IN HECTARE

0.1440

0.0720

0.0050

0.1872

0.1440

0.0917

0.2376

0.0912

0.1224

0.0735

0.1656

0.1800

0.1656

0.0050

0.0288

0.0720

0.3744

0.0050

0.2088

0.1153

0.1152

0.0720

0.0864

0.1485

0.2160

0.0216

0.0050

0.0504

0.3312

0.1080

0.0050

0.1512

0.1028

0.1296

0.2304

0.0072

0.0360

0.0864

0.0072

0.0288

0.0144

[F.N. R-31015/ 88/ 2004- OR- II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secretary 13453 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4645.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्वात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या कम.आ. 2671 तारीख 28 जुलाई, 2005, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 30 जुलाई, 2005 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इंदौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणां राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए. मुंबई-मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 10 सितम्बर, 2005 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन , केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से सलग्नं अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

राज्य: राजस्थान तहसील झालरापाटन

अनुसूची

जिला: झालावाड़

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

क्र० ग्राम का नाम

1 चंगेरी

0.0504

108

0.4464

0.6048

127

0.0360

273

0.1512

289

0.2880

296

0.0432

277

0.0072

0.0216

0.1440

0.0216

0.2088

457

2 गिन्धोर

0.0288

474

0.0159

406

0.0152

387

0.0196

339

0.0181

327

0.0335

309

0.0360

3 चाँदिया खेड़ी

249

0.1669

158

0.0538

225

0.0072

160:

0.1515

272

0.0738

4 मालीपुरा

275

0.3356

257

0.0451

282

0.0144

281

0.0144

280

0.2016

0.0576

277

887

5 झालरापाटन

0.0965

6 टोलखेड़ा

0.0216

0.1296

0.0396

7 जरेल

379

0.0216

381

0.1800

382

0.1800

384

0.2076

152

0.0072

8 डाबलीकलां

245

0.0108

302

0.0072

183

0.0216

0.0072

9 माधोपुर

[फा०सं ०आर०-31015/77/2004-ओ आर -11 ]

हरीश कुमार , अवर सचिव, भारत सरकार 13454

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927

NewDelhi , the 9th December, 2005

S. O. 4645. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.2671 , dated the 28th July, 2005, issaed under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) published in the Gazette of India dated the 30 July , 2005 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying on extension pipeline for transportation of petroleum products through Mumbai -Manglya Pipeline Extension Project from Manglya ( Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

Andwhereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 10 September, 2005;

Andwhereas the competent authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

Andwhereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;

Now,therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that the right ofuser in the land , specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise af the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

STATE : RAJASTHAN

DISTRICT : JHALAWAR

TEHSIL: JHALARAPATAN

AREA IN HECTARE

SURVEY NO .

S.No. NAME OF VILLAGE

0.0504

1 CHANGERI

0.4464

108

0.6048

0.0360

127

0.1512

273

0.2880

289

0.0432

296

0.0072

277

0.0216

0.1440

0.0216

0.2088

0.0288

457

2 GINDHOR

0.0159

474

0.0152

406

0.0196

387

0.0181

339

0.0335

327

0.0360

309

0.1669

249

3 CHANDIA KHEDI

0.0538

158

0.0072

225

0.1515

160

0.0738

272

4 MALIPURA

0.3356

275

0.0451

257

0.0144

282

0.0144

281

0.2016

280

0.0576

277

0.0965

887

5 JHALARAPATAN

0.0216

6 TOLKHEDA

0.1296

0.0396

0.0216

379

7 JAREL

0.1800

381

0.1800

382

0.2076

384

0.0072

152

8 DABLIKALAN

0.0108

245

0.0072

302

0.0216

183

0.0072

9 MADHOPUR

[F.N. R- 31015/ 77/2004-OR - II ] HARISH KUMAR, Under Secretary 13455 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

नईदिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4646.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में वह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मेसर्स गैस द्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड की संप्रवर्तक कम्पनी मेसर्स रिलाएंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड है , के गोवो के उत्तरी/दक्षिणी अपतट ऑफसोर के खोज ब्लाकों और आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य की संरचनाओं से आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य में , मेडक जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृ‌तिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मेसर्स गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपजाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिं में उपयोग के अधि। कार का अर्जन) अधि। नियम् 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबन्द है उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के लिए श्री पी. बुच्चारेडडी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गैस द्रांसपोर्टेशन एंड इन्फास्टक्चर कम्पनी लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन प्रयोजना , 403 , ' सी' एवरेस्ट ब्लाक , आदित्या एन्कलेव , अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद , आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य पिन 500 038 को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूचि

आर ओ यूअर्जित करने के लिए श्रेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर

सथ-डिविजन नंबर

गांव का नाम

हेक्टर

सिएर

एर

राज्य : आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

जिल्ला : मेदक

मंडल: जिन्नारम

1 ) अलीनगर

15 2) गडिपोतारम

सर्वे से 70 और 72 के बीच में

13456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYAN 19, 1927 [PART II- SEC. 3( ii ) ] 1

6 1 मेडल जिन्नारम

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदे, क

खिला मेंढक

3 ) चेट्लापोतारम

156*

4) किप्टायपल्लि

157*

158

00 मंडल: संगारेड्डी

जिल्ला: मेदक

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

00 1 ) कोल्लापूर

44*

45*

64*

76*

79*

80*

सर्वे नं 35 में

जिल्ला: मंदक

राज्य: आन्ध्रा प्रदेश मंडल: कोण्डापूर

30 1 ) मल्कापूर

107

108*

112

113

114

126

127*

131

132*

139*

524

525

19 13457 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

5 1

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश मंडल: कोण्डापुर

मिल्ला मेंदूक

526

527

542*

544*

609*

610*

सर्वे सं 9 और 540 के बीच में

सर्वे सं 132 और 524 के बीच में

सर्वे सं 526 और 527 के बीच में

सर्वे नं 114/1 में

सर्वे नं 131/1 और 127/3 में

* का.आ. 211 , दिनांक: 22-01-2002 व्दारा पी.एम.पी. ऐक्ट, 1962 की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्र्तगत सूचित किये गये सर्वे नंबर । इस प्रतिपादन नया विस्तीर्ण केलिए ।

[फा. सं. एल-14014/32/ 2005-जी.पी. ]

एस . बी. मंडल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th December. 2005

S. O. 4646.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of the natural gas from exploration blocks in the Northern/ Southern Offshore of Goa and Structures in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited , the Promoter company of M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited to the various consumers of Medak District in the State of Andhra Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by M/s Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited;

And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such Pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the rightof user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification, as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri P. Butcha Reddy, Competent Authority, Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited , Pipeline Project , 403 , ' C' - Everest Block, Aditya Enclave , Ameerpet, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh , Pin - 500 038 .

13458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYAN 19 , 1927

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) )

Schedule

SurveyNo.

Village

2 1

Area to be acquired for ROU Sub-Division No.

C-Are

Are

Hectare

State: Andhra Pradesh

District : Medak

Mandal : Jinnaram

70 1. Allinagar

57 2.Gadipotharam

In Bet Sy . No. 708 72

79 3. Chetlapotharam

156* 4.Kistalpalli

157*

158

State:Andhra Pradesh

District: Medak

Mandai : Sangareddy

35 1.Kothlapur

44*

45*

64*

76-

79*

80*

0 .

In SY. No.35

13459 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

5 6

District : Medak

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Kondapur

30 1. Maikapur

107

108*

112

113

114

126

127*

131

132*

139*

524

525

526

527

542*

544*

609*

610*

In Bet Sy No.98540

Iri Bet Sy. No. 1328 524

In Bet Sy. No.5268527

InSy. No.114/1

In Sy. No.131 /18127/3

* Survey Nos . notified vide S.O. 211 dated 22-01-2002 u/ s 3( 1 ) of P &MP Act 1962. Present propasal is for additional extents.

[F. No. L-14014/32/2005-G.P. ]

3. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

3423 G1 /05-20 [PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13460

श्रम मंत्रालय

18-8-2004 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर , 2005

"Whether the action of the management of Punjab and Sind Bank , Zonal Office , Central Zone , New Delhi interminating the services of Shri Ram Chander, Ex- Gun-Man w.e.f. 4-7-2001 without complying Section 25 - F of the I. D. Act, 1947 is just , fair and legal? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?"

का. आ. 4647.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब व सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, नं.1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/77/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2005

2. Perusal of the record shows that in response to the notice dated 28-8-2004 the workman claimant sent a written request to fix the case for 27-2-2005 because he has some apprehension of pressure etc. of Gundas . The case was then adjourned to 20-1-2005 , 28-3-05 , 12-5-05 , 15-6-05 and 22-8-05 but neither the claimant nor any body else on his behalf appeared to file the claim . It appears that the workman is not interested in filing the claim and contesting this case . As such there appears to be no dispute and hence a no dispute Award is Accordingly passed. File be consigned to record room.

S. S. BAL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005 S.O. 4647. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governntent hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 41/2004) of the Cent . Govt. Indus . Tribunal -cum - Labour Court . 1 No , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Punjab and Sind Bank , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2005 .

[No. L. - 12012/77/2004 - IR ( B - II)]

C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

का. आ. 4648.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्रके संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 247/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/150/2000- आई आर ( डी यू) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्क अधिकारी BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL : PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , NEW DELHI

New Dellu , the 14th November, 2005 I.D. No. 41/2004

In the inatter of dispute between :

Workman

Shri Ram Chander, Village and P.O. Bisholi Kirpalpur. Tehsil: Gianpur, Distt. Sant Ravi Das Nagar, Uttar Pradesh

S.O. 46-48 - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 247/2000 ) of the Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal/Labour Court . No. 1. Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation management of Dep . of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Governrnent on 14-11-2005 .

Versus:

[No. L -40012 /150 /2000 - IR ( DU ) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer.

The General Manager ,

ANNEXURE

Punjab and Sind Bank , Bank House,

CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 CHANDIGARH .

1. D. No. 247/2004

21. Rajindra Place. New Delhi - 110001 .

Management

Appearances : None for the workman .

Sh. Brij Lal Yadav s/o Sh. Jagroop Singh , H.No. 1929. Indira Colony. Manimajra, Chandigarh - 160001.

Shri Sunil Parkash A/R for management .

Applicant AWARD

Versus

1. The Chief General Manager , Telecom, Punjab Circle, Sector 34, Chandigarh 160001 .

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12012/ 77 / 2004 - IR ( B - II ) dated 13461 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Indian Airlines Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2005.

2.The Principal General Manager, Telecom, Sector - 18, Chandigarh- 160001.

[No.L- 11012/82/99 -IR (C- I) ]

Respondent

S.S. GUPTA , Under Sec .

Appearances

ANNEXURE

None.

Forthe workman:

Shri G. C. Babbar

For the management :

AWARD

BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL : PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT , NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 25/2000

Passed on 20-10-2005

In the matter of dispute between:

Central Govt.vide No. L. 40012 / 150 /2000 - IR (D.U) dated 30th of June 2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

Shri Shiv Darshan , Driver , son of Shri Jyoti Prakash Sharma, r/o F- 93 , Himkunj , Sector 14, Rohini , Delhi .

Workman

Versus:

"Whether the action of the management of Deptt . of Telecom . Chandigarh in terminating the services of Shri Brij Lal Yadav S/ o Sh. Jagroop Singh w.e.f. 27-2-99 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled? "

The General Manager , (P) ,

IndianAirlines Limited,

Northern Region, I.G.I. Airport , Palam, New Delhi - 110001 .

Management

Appearances : None for the workman.

Ms. Poonam Dass A/ R for management .

AWARD

2. Case repeatedly called. None has put up appearance for the workman. Awaited up to 2.30 P.M. As per report on Court Notice for today the workman is not residing on the address given . Authorised representative or the workman are also not appearing on several dates and even today. It appears that workman is not interested inprosecuting his case . In view ofthe above , the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . for want of prosecution . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh

20-10-2005

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012 / 82/ 99 -ID ( C - I ) dated 17-2-2000 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर , 2005

"Whether the action of the Indian Airlines Ltd. , New Delhi in stopping/ terminating Shri Shiv Darshan , Driver from service w.e.f. 1-5-99 is just and fair ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? " का. आ. 4649.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन एयरलाइंस लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली -1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -11012/82/99- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2005

2.Brief facts ofthis case as culled from the pleadings i.e. statement of claim and written statement are that the workman Shiv Darshan claims that he was employed as Driver by the respondent M/ s Indian Airlines w.e.f. 23rd ofSeptember , 97 till 30th of April , 99 on casual basis and he worked regularly to the satisfaction of the management and his services were terminated on 28th of April , 99. He made representation on the date of termination requesting not to terminate his services and for his regularisation but the same was rejected. His services were termiated illegally . He was not given any notice nor paid wages in lieu of notice as required under the law as such his services were terminated illegally. He was not given any notice nor paid wages in lieu of notice as required under the law as such his services were terminated illegally , arbitrarily and in violation of the provisions of law . Workman made another S.O. 4649. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 25/2000 ) ofthe Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal/Labour Court , New Delhi- I now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in reletion to the management of 13462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

representation on 1-5-99 requesting for regularising his appointinent but of no avail . Aggrieved by the illegal termination of his services workman approached the Labour Commissioner for reconciliation vide application dated 10th ofMay , 99. No settlement was arrived at and the efforts resulted in failure and ultimately the dispute was referred to this Tribunal for adjudication vide above reference, and that the action of the management is illegal and against principles of natural justice and he claims reinstatement with full back wages with continuity of service.

3. Claim has been contested by the management by filing its reply raising preliminary objections that he was engaged on casual basis to meet the exigency requirement of the management and that the matter has been settled by theHon'ble High Court of Delhi vide judgement order dated21st ofAugust , 98 in wirt petition No. 2644/98 (97) titled as Gurpal Singh and other Vs. Indian Airlines and others as confirmed during the course of arguments following the previous judgment reported in JT 1995 ( 7 ) S.C.545 and 1996 ( 9 ) S.C.C. 217 following the decision reported inwrit petition No. 4113/91 Sushil Kumar Saini Vs. Indian Airlines and others and the workman is not entitled to the relief claimed. He being only casual worker he could not be included in the panel formulated under the direction of the High Court and otherwise also his name did not appear in the panel formulated of drivers. Onmerits the claim of the workman is denied . Workman has not filed rejoinder nor adduced evidence and failedto substantiate his claim pertaining to the referencc . He has not appearing in this case and last twenty -one hearing since 26-11-2001 .

On the other hand management has examined Sh. Vijay Kumar Senior Manager who substantiated the contentions of the management that he is not entitled to the claim and that he could not be covered under the scheme formulated under the directions of the High Court. As such his name could not find place in the panel formulated under the direction of the high Court and he could not be adjusted for regular appointment . In view of the above facts his statement goes unrebutted on record and in view of his statement the workman is not entitled to the claim of reinstatement and appointment in the regular post. Reference is answered accordingly . File be consigned to record room .

Dated: 7-11-2005

S. S. BAL , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4650.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -1 चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 153/99 ) को

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/22/99- आईआर( बी- II ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th November, 2005 S.O. 4650.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 153/ 99) of the Cent. Govt. Indus . Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14-11-2005 .

[No.L - 12012/22/ 99 - IR (B - II) ]

C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 CHANDIGARH Case No. I. D 153/99

TheGeneral Secretary , Bank of India Empls . Association , C/o Bank of India , Sector 17 , Main branch , Chandigarh .

Applicant

Versus

1. The Zonal Manager, Bank of India , Zonal Office , 181- 182, Sector - 17C, Chandigarh .

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman:

None

For the management : Sh . N.K. Zakhmi

AWARD Passed on 7-11-2005

CentralGovt. vide No. L. 12012/22/99/IR/ (B - II ) dated 23-6-1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication: ---

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India in denial of promotion to Sh . Pramjit Rajpal is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from what date?"

2. None appeared on behalf of the workman . Workman or his advocate is not appearing for the last several dates despite regd . notices issued on 12-7-2005, 4-10-2005 for today. The Ld. counsel for the management submitted that the reference may be returned to the Appropriate Govt . as workman is not interested in prosecuting his case and it appears that he is gainfully employed somewhere. In view of the above , as workman, it appears is not interested to persue present reference , 13463 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

the same is returned for want of prosecution. CentralGovt. be informed. File be consigned to record.

CHANDIGARH

7-11-2005

RAJESH KUMAR, Presding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub section 1 and sub section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (the Act for short) . Vide Government of India, Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi, order dated 12-5-1997 The terms ofreference given in the schedule are as follows :

"Whether the action ofthe management ofCentral Bank ofIndia, Regional Office , Pune in terminating theservices ofShri Deoram S. Wayal, ex -Clerk w.e.f. 26-2-1994 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe said workman is entitled? " का. आ. 4651.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का.14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -1 मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 34/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/60/96- आईआर( बी-11 ) ]

2.Shri . Deoram Skharam Wayal (hereinafter referred to as workman) has filed the Statement of Claim dated 15-7-1997 . The workman was in service since 2-12-1971 of the Central Bank of India having its Regional Office at Satranjiwala Chowk, Ravivar Peth, Pune (hereinafter referred to as Ist Party Bank) .

सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th November, 2005

3.He was posted as Peon at different branches of the Bank. He was promoted to the post of Clerk on 14-7-1998. He had unblemished record. He was charge sheeted on 2-9-1993 and subsequently charge sheeted on 16-8-1993 for acts of misconduct .

4. The charges as per charge sheet dated 02-6-1993 are as follows:

S.O. 4651. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award Ref. No. 34/97) of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum-Labour Court Mumbai No. 1 as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Bank of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 14-11-2005.

[No. L. 12012/60/96 - IR (B -II) ] C. GANGADHARAN , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

"While working at our Peth Branch during the periodfrom 8-3-1975 to 11-7-88, he misuses his position as an employee ofthe Bank by deriving pecuniary benefit for himself through the loan which has been allowed to one shri Bala Namdeo wayal, R.O, Awsari Kdh, Tal. Ambegaon, for Rs. 6,400- on 28-10-1983 for purchase of OilEngine.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 MUMBAI PRESENT JUSTICE GHANSHYAM DASS

Further he also issued a : No Due Certificate " in favour ofBank ofBaroda on 21-6-90 to Shri Bala Namdeo Wayal thoughthere was a Delhi balance ofRs . 8769.84 in the loan account ofShri Bala Namdev Wayal . " Presiding Officer

5. The charge as per supplementary charge sheet dated 16-8-1993 is as follows:

REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 34 OF 1997

Parties: Employers in relation to the management

ofCentral Bank of India

And

Their workmen. (Shri . D.S. Wayal )

Appearances:

: Shri . Lancy

For the management

D'souza,

For the Union

"On 13-1-1993 , Mr. Wayal , unauthorisedly visited PethBr./accompanied Shri . B.V. Bhujbal , G.S. Jadhav , for verification of documents pertaining to the Departmental Enquiry initiated against Shri . Bhujbal . Mr. K. K. Gawade, Clerk, Shinoli Br . Was also with them. Even though, Mr. Wayal was in no way connected with the Departmental Enquiry case of Mr. Bhujbal , he unauthorisedly accompanied them. During the process of said verification, the following four files of borrowal accounts which are subject matter of the Charge sheet dated 2-6-1993 issued to Shri Wayal were unauthorisedly removed and are missing.

:Mr. Umesh Nabar , Adv .

Maharashtra

State

(i ) Mr. Pandurang Sonu Wayal . (ii) Mr. Bala Namdeo Wayal.

Mumbai dated the 31st day of October , 2005 13464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

( iii ) Mr. Shivaji Bhikaji Wayal .

( iv) Mrs. Indubai Bhikaji Rahane .

6. The departmental enquiry was conducted in which the workman duly participated . The enquiry resulted in proving of the first and second charge and partly proving the third charge. The show cause notice was issued to the workman to which the workman replied . The Disciplinary Authority accepted the findings of the Enquiry Officer and held the workman guilty for all the three charges leveled against him . The Disciplinary Authority accordingly imposed the Consolidated punishment of "Discharge from Bank's service " as per par 19.6 ( E) of Bipartite Settlement . The workman was thereafter heard on the quantum of punishment also but the punishment has been finally imposed as proposed . The workman preferred the appeal before the Appellate Authority which was also dismissed vide order dated 10/5/1994 . The workman then raised the dispute before the Conciliation Officer but it failed . Hence this reference .

7. The workman has challenged the enquiry report on the ground as stated in para 6 of Statement of Claim . It isallegedby the workman that the Enquiry Officer violated the principles of natural justice and thus the enquiry is bad and is liable to be set aside . It is alleged that the enquiry was based on a written complaint made by Shri.B.N. Wayal who was not produced as witness before the Enquiry Officer and the workman was not offered an opportunity to cross examine him . The complainant was not got examined , nor complaint was got proved by any other witness by the employer. There was no legal evidence in support of the complaint . No evidence was produced before the Enquiry Officer to show the actual removal of the files in question by the workman . A criminal case was there in this regard against the workman but the workman was acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate concerned. It is also alleged that the punishment of discharge from service is shocking as it is disproportionate.

8. The workman has alleged that the loan was taken by Shri.B.N. Wayal somewhere in the year 1983. At that time, the workman was posted as Peon . The workman could not have influenced any higher official of the Bank for sanction of the loan which was taken by B.N. Wayal , a relative of the workman for purchase of Oil engine . The oil engine was actually purchased by Mr. B. N. Wayal and it was repaid in instalments by him . The last instalment was paid on 14-9-1991 . Thus, the workman did not receive any benefits within the aforesaid loan. The complaint was made falsely after a lapse of about 8 years . It is false to allege that the workman himself issued a false " No Due Certificate" on the letter head of Central Bank of India for Grantof loanby Bank of Baroda to B. N. Wayal. Regarding the Supplementary charges sheet the workman alleged that he did not remove the files nor he visited the Bank unauthorizedly . There was no evidence to prove this charge

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] at all . Since the complaint was not produced the principles of natural justice were violated and the very basis of the complaint is not proved by the Bank. Further , the workman was not permitted to cross examine Shri . S.D. Gadkari and on that score also principles of natural justice were violated.

9. The Bank has filed the written statement . The allegations made by the workman are denied . The documents have been filed on record to show the entire proceedings recorded by the Enquiry Officer . The enquiry was conducted in a fair manner. Due opportunity of hearing was given to the workman who participated in the enquiry through his authorized representative . No doubt, the complainant was not examined but that did not effect the result nor resulted in vitiation of the enquiry . No principles of naturaljustice was violated . It is true that Mr. Gadbari was not offered for cross examination but that was not necessary since he produced the document and not appeared as witness to state anything . The workman was offered full opportunity to defend himself. He failed to led any evidence in his defence. The workman was issued show cause notice. The workinan replied . His reply was considered by the Disciplinary Authority . The punishment was imposed . The workman was again heard on the quantum of punishment . The finał order was passed . The workmanpreferred an appeal which resulted in dismissal .

10. The first point for consideration is as to whether the domestic enquiry has been conducted in a fair manner and the findings of the Enquiry Officer are correct .

11. I have gone through the evidence/documents available on record . The arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties have been considered. The entire file of the enquiry proceedings has been perused in presence of the learned counsel for the parties during the course of arguments .

12. The perusal of the enquiry file goes to show that the workman was issued with a first charges sheet and also the Supplementary charges shect . The charges had been clearly spelled out . No information is wanting . The workman appeared through authorized representative. The workman remained present on each and every date fixed by the Enquiry Officer . The workman availed full opportunity by examining cach and every document and the witness produced by the Presenting Officer before the Enquiry Officer . Mr. Gadbari had produced the documents. Hewas not offered for cross examination to the workman . The opportunity was given to lead the evidence in defense but the workman did not produce any evidence whatsoever in his defense . The workman never objected to the procedure adopted by the Enquiry Officer nor ever emphasized before the Enquiry Officer for any prejudice tohim.

13. It is true that Mr. B. N. Wayal was not examined as witness before the Enquiry Officer . A date was given 13465 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

him before the Enquiry Officer and avail the benefit, if it was still available to him . It appears that the workman himself chose not to produce B. N. Wayal and if he produced, the statement might go against him . The workman could have insisted before the Enquiry Officer forproduction of B. N. Wayal . The workman was not allowed to cross examined Mr. Gadkari but it is clear that it did not cause any prejudice to the workman. His cross examination was not required nor it could help the workman inany manner.

16. The third charge came against the workman by way of Supplementary charge sheet . I feel that evidence to prove this charge is of circumstantial nature. No direct evidence could be possible for the Bank . The presence of the workman in the Bank was not unauthorized since he was permitted as evident form the record . Since the files have been missing which were relevant to the charges in question against the workman the same presumption could be drawn against the workman that he was the person behind the removal of the files since he was the person going to be directly benefited by it . Even if it may be presumed for a moment that this charge is not proved, thatwould not make any difference . The other charges are sufficiently duly proved on record.

for his production to the Presenting Officer but somehow or other witness was not produced. The main contention ofthe workman is that non production of the complainant himself amounts to violation of principles of natural justice since it causes prejudice to the workman as the basis of the complaint is not proved. In this regard . I feel that non production of the complainant itseif did not cause any prejudice to the workman if examined would have gone to after the result of the enquiry. It is admitted fact by the workman that the complaint was made by Bala Namdeo Wayal. He is admittedly the relative of the workman . It is the admitted position that the loan of Rs. 6, 400 was granted to B. N. Wayal . The purpose of loan was the purchase of Oil engine . The Oil engine was actually purchased. The receipt of purchase is available on record. It is the admitted position that the delivery of the engine was taken by workman himself under his signature . It is also the admitted position that the loan application was filled up by the workman in his own hand writing . The workman in his first reply did not specify any ground or circumstance under which B. N. Wayal had the reason to file a false complaint . At s later stage, the workman tried to allege that B. N. Wayal had enemosity on account of property dispute. It issurprising that no evidence whatsoever was led by the workman on this point . It is also surprising that the workman did not offer himself for cross examination when askedby the Enquiry Officer and required by the Presenting Officer.

17. In Maharashtra State Board of Secondry & Higher Secondary Education v/s K. S. Gandhi , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in a domestic enquiry it is the prepondrence of probabilities and not proof beyond reasonable doubt .

18. In Kathi v/s State Bank of India & Ors . 1984(48) FLR 38 Honourable Supreme Court while considering a domestic enquiry against the delinquent with State Bank of India observed:

The loan was repaid in installments . The last installment was paid in 14-9-1991. In the mean time, the development took place that B. N. Wayal wanted to take loanfrom Bank of Baroda for which a ' No Due Certificate ' was required . This certificate was accordingly issued by Bank in question . It is alleged that this Certificate was issued by the workman . I feel that no direct evidence is available on record to show that workman issued a Certificate nor it is being issued with his signature nor it could be issued since he was not posted at that time in the said Branch in question being transferred to another branch. It is clear on record that debit balance was there against B. N. Wayal for non payment of the entire loan amount ti!! the date of issue of " No Due Certificate" . The question arises as to who was to be benefited out of the "No Due Certificate " in question . It is clear on record that this certifiate could never be issued since debit balance was already there against B. N. Wayal . The only person who was going to be benefited is the workman who managed to get issued this certificate so that B. N. Wayal may avail the laon facility from Bank of Baroda. The last payment of install ment of loan was made after the issue of the aforesaid certificate .

"In respect ofan order involving adverse or penal consequences against an officer or an employee of StatutoryCorporations like the State Bank ofIndia, there must be an investigation into the charges consistent with the requirement ofthe situation in accordence with the principles of natural justice as far as these were applicable to a particular situation. So whether a particular principle of natural justice has been violated or not has to be judged in the background of the nature ofcharges , the nature of the investigation conducted in the back ground of any statutory or relevant rules governing such enquiries. The basic concept isfair play in action administrative, judicial or quasi- judicial. When on the question offacts there was no dispute, no real prejudice has been caused to a partyaggrivedby an order, by absence ofanyformal opportunity of cross - examination per se does not invalidate or vitiate the decision arrived at fairly. This is more so when the party against whom an order has been passed does not dispute the facts 15. It may also be observed that the workman himself couldproduce B. N. Wayal if he was really interested in his production before the Enquiry Officer. Since he was his own relative , it was very easy for him to have produced [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 13466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

and does not demand to test the veracity of the version of the credibility ofthe statement " .

19. State of Haryana & Anr . v /s . Ratansingh 1997 (34) FLR 264 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held:

punishment for discharge from service . The appeal failed. I conclude that the action of the management in discharging the workman from service w.e.f. 26-2-1994 is legal and justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief by this tribunal.

24. The reference is accordingly answered.

Justice GHANSHYAM DASS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 14 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4652.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 /80/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] सी. गंगाधरण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th November, 2005 "It is well settled that in a domestic enquiry the strict and sophisticated rules of evidence under the Indian Evidence Act may not apply . All materials which are logically probative for a prudent mind are permissible. There is no allergy to hearsay evidence provided it has reasonable nexus and credibility. It is true that departmental authorities and administrative tribunals must be careful in evaluating such material and should not glibily swallow what is strictly speaking not relevant under the Indian Evidence Act. The essence ofa judicial approach is objectivity , exclusion of estraneous materials or considerations and observance of rules of natural justice . Of course , fair play is the basis and if perversity or arbitrariness bias or surrender ofindependence of judgment vitiate the conclusions reached , such. finding even though ofa domestic tribunal , cannot beheldgood".

20. In 1994 I CLR 245 S. K. Awasthy v/s M. R. Bhope Honourable High Court of Bombay held that the standard ofproof required to be applied in a domestic enquiry is to preponderence ofprobabilities .

S.O. 4652.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 48 / 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank , and their workman , received by the Central Government 14-11-2005 . on

[No. L- 12011 /80/2004 -IR(B- 11) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .

21. In 1964 FLR 142 Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. v/s . The Workman the Honourable Supreme Court held that where an enquiry has been fairly conducted and the findings recorded therein are based on evidence , which is believed , there would be no justification for the Indistrial Tribunal to consider the same facts for itself.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT , JAIPUR Case No. CGIT -48/ 2004 Reference No. L-12011/80/2004- IR(B- II) 22. Considering the matter from different angles and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the charge levied against the workman. I conclude that non production of B. N. Wayal and not offering of Mr. Gadkari for cross examination enquiry in question are not fatal . It did not amount to violation of principles of naturaljustice nor it caused any prejudice to the workman . There was sufficient evidence before the Enquiry Officer to conclude that charges No. 1 and 2 sufficiently proved on record .

The General Secretrary , Rajashthan State Bank Employees ' Welfare Forum, Chaurvedi Bhawan, Indira Colony, Near Atta Temple, Alwar ...Applicant

Vesrus

1. The Assistant General Manager ,

Syndicate Bank , Sarojini Hiuse, 6-Bhagwan Dass Road, New Delhi

2. The Branch Manager , SyndicateBank , RSBCC,

Non-applicants

JhalanaDungri , Jaipur(Raj.)

23. Considering the entire record and keeping in mind the legal position I conclude that it is a case where the enquiry has been fairly conducted and the findings arrived at are correct . I do not find any material to infer any prejudice to the workman or to conclude the violation of principles of natural justice . I do not find any inaterial to set saide the enquiry or its findings which are based on evidence available on record. The workman was offered due opportunity to defend himself at each and every stage. He was issued show cause notice after the enquiry report . He did file his reply. It was considered . He was again heard on the quantum of punishment . Lastly , he preferred the appeal before the Appellate Authority against his [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

PRESENT :

PresidingOfficer : Sh. R. C. Sharma,

: Sh. C. D. Chaturvedi Forthe applicant

the non -applicants Sh . Anurag Agrawal and PuneetGupta

19-10-2005 Date ofAward

AWARD

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D ' of Sub - sections 1 & 2(A) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disptites Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ' Act ' ) has referred this industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under :-

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of the Syndicate Bank , New Delhi in dismissing the services of workman Shri Amar Singh , Clerk- cum- cashier posted at Jalana Doongari Branch , Jaipur w.e.f. 30-11-2000 is justified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?" 2. The applicant - union has pleaded in its claim statement that the workman Amar Singh while working as a Clerk/ Cashier at the RSCCB Branch of the non- applicant at Jaipur was chargesheeted with the gross misconduct that he had misappropriated the public money aggregating to Rs . 40,000 deposited by the customers of the branch and acted in the manner prejudicial to the interest of the bank under Clause 19.5 (J) of the Bipartite Settlement . The Union has further stated that from the initial stage of issuance of chargesheet the bank management has kept the workman under threat and mental pressure of facing severe consequences and it also gathered about 8 persons at the venue of enquiry proceedings as well as that even the complainant Ghanshyam Sharma, who alleged the misappropriation against the delinquent , was also allowed to accompany with an advocate for his guidance at the time of his deposition . It has further been stated that the consolidated charge of misappropriation of the said money was not at all proved since only two witnesses were examined by the management relating to the amount of Rs. 20000 and 1500 respectively. It has also been averred that the main charge was not proved against the delinquent and the enquiry conducted against the workman was biased, formal and pre - determined . The Union has urged that the dismissal order dated 30-11-2000 is illegal and void ab initio , which is liable to be quashed and the workman be reinstated in the bank service with all consequential benefits .

3423 G1 /05--21

13467

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

3. Resisting the claim , the non- applicants in their written counter have averred that the workman was chargesheeted for his misconducts of misappropriating the customers ' money while he was working as a Cashier at the said branch, who was chargesheeted on 31-3-200 for misappropriating the amount worth Rs . 40,000 deposited by the customers of the branch on there different occasions and for deriving undue pecuniary benefits for himself at the cost of the bank , whose misconduct was covered by Clause 19.5 ( J ) of the Bipartite Settlement . It has also been pleaded that the enquiry officer vide his report dated 30-8-2000 has found the charges levelled against the workman to be proved conclusively and the disciplinary authority concurred his findings . The workman had also unconditionally admitted his guilt during the course of the enquiry proceedings and even he did not cross - examine the management witnesse . A show- cause notice was also issued to him by the disciplinary authority and after hearing the workman the disciplinary authority confirmed the proposed punishment of dismissal vide his order dated 30-1-2000 . It has also been stated that the acts committed by the delinquent weren highly dishonest acts and serious in nature which attracted the deterrent punishment and he has shattered the confidence reposed in him by the bank. The non- applicants have denied that the delinquent was put under any threat or grave mental pressure , that the enquiry proceedings were biased , formal and pre - determined and has specifically stated that the disputant had participated throughout the enquiry proceedings and duly signed the enquiry proceedings .

4. After hearing both the parties on the preliminary issue of the fairness of domestic enquiry , this Court vide its order dated 3-6-2005 has found the domestic enquiry to be fair and proper.

5. 1have heard both the parties on the merits of the dispute and have scanned the record.

6. The Id. representative for the Union contends thateven if the workman has admitted his guilt, the Tribunal has wide powers to modify the termination order passed by the management and the Ld . representative has highlighted the circumstances for a sympathetic consideration of the Court on the question of reduction of penalty that the workman's wife was ill prior to the alleged incident and the customers had not complained against him. It has also been contended that the bank authorities compelled the workman -delinquent either to admit his guilt or the FIR would be lodged against him.

7. Per contra, the Ld. representative for the bank defending the impugned punishment order contends [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13468

that the punishment order passed by the disciplinary authority cannot be modified and that the workman had misappopriated the money depositedby the customers and has shaken the belief of the bank and his acts were highly prejudicial to the interest of the bank.

8. I have bestowed my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions .

wherein the bank employee was dismissed from service on account of his admitted misconduct of withdrawing the money unauthorisedly form customers ' account but who was reinstated by the Tribunal with back -wages by modifying the punishment . But the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that a bank employee who deals with the public money cannot be treated leniently and the award of the Tribunal was modified by inserting an additional condition that the employee would not get any increment for 10 years with cumulative effect . Even in this case , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that the "misappropriation by an employee of bank is a misappropriation of public money and must be treated very differently " .

9. The sole point agitated before me is whether the workman deserves to be leniently punished under the circumstances of the case. On a careful scrutiny of the enquiry proceedings it is revealed that the workman was charged with the misconduct of misappropriating an amount aggregating to Rs . 40.000 on three different occasions , which were deposited by the customers in their SB acounts respectively, who gained undue pecuniary benefit for himself at the cost of the bank by keeping some of the amount with him and acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the bank falling under Clause , 19.5 ( J ) of the Bipartite Settlement .

12. In 2003 LLR SC 436 , the Hon'ble Apex Court has observe that a bank employee is required to exercise highest standards of honesty and integrity and his good conduct and discipline are of utmost importance. Similarly, in ( 1998 ) 4 SCC 310 , the Hon'ble Apex Court has expressed that in the banking business absolute-devotion , integrity and honesty needs to be preserved by every bank employee and if this is not observed then the confidence of the public/ depositors would be impaired. In this case, the employee was awarded the punishment of dismissal from services .

13. In the light of the principles enunciated by the Hon'bic Apex Court supra , the punishment inflicted upon the workman -delinquent looking to his proven gross misconduct is not excessive or shockingly harsh . Therefore , in my considered opinion , the impugned punishment order does not warrant any interference and the submission advanced on behalf of the Union is bereft ofmerit .

14. For the foregoing reasons , the workman is entitled to no relief.

15. In the result , the reference is answered in the negative against the applicant - union and in favour of the bank management and it is held that the dismissal order dated 30-11-200t) passed by the management of the Bank against the workman is justified and the claim of the workman is rejected . An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

10. On commencing the enquiry proceedings on 28-7-2000 , the charge was read over to the workman by the Enquiry Officer, who in clear terms admitted the charge . Apart it , the Enquiry Officer has elaborately dealt with the evidence adduced on behalf of the management . The management had examined four withnesses , viz . , MW - 1 Shyam Sunder Aggarwal and MW - 4 Ghanshyam Sharma , who are the customers of the RSCCB branch as well as MW- 2 Vinod Sheth , Sr. Branch Manager and MW - 3 Anil Dandia , the Branch Manager . They have established the misconduct levelled against the workman . The Enquiry Officer has elaborately discussed the charge and has given reasons which were considered by the disciplinary authority before giving the conclusion that the charge levelled against the workman is proved. It is pertinent to mention here that on 28-7-2000 , the workman had submitted an application before the Manager of the said branch that he had kept the money with himself given to him by the customers for crediting into their accounts respectively . He has elearly admitted his guilt in the application and has also expressed his willingness to liquidate the said money with interest . His guilt is further proved by the management witnesses . Therefore , the impugned punishment order does not call for any interference .

16. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication udner Section 17 (1 ) of the Act.

R. C. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 11. The Id. representative for the Union has strongly placed his reliance upon 2000 SCC ( L & S ) 830 , 13469 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

LocalityAllowance at Shimla rates to their employees posted at Gagret and near by stations and paying Remote Locality Allowance at Shimla rate to similarly situated employees posted at Una is just and fair? If not, to what relief the employees posted at Gagret and near by stations are entitled to and from which date?"

का. आ. 4653.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40011/ 14/96- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2005

2. The case is fixed for evidence of the workman . Management requested for closing the case as workman/ union is not taking interest as union is not appearing nor their advocate is appearing on earlier dates also . It is submitted that no union office bearer is taking any interest . In view of the above submissions when the union or their advocate is not taking interest in prosecuting the reference , the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . for want of prosecution . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh

27-10-2005

RAJESH KUMAR , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर, 2005

S.O. 4653. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Rer No. 33/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , No. 1 Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt . of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-11-2005 .

[No. L-40011 / 14/ 96 - IR (DU) ] N.P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

का. आ. 4654.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH.

[सं. एल-12011/232/ 2002- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] Case No. I.D. No. 33/1998

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव

New Delhi . the 14th November . 2005 All India Telecom Empl . Union Group ` D` & 111 C/o D. R. Sharma , H. No. 551 , Sector 41 - A, Chandigarh - 160017.

...Applicant

Versus:

1. The Telecom District Engineer, Hamirpur ( H.P) 177001 .

..Respondent

S.O. 4654.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 57/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-11-2005.

Appearance :

For the workman None

[No. L. - 12011/232/2002 - IR (B - II) ] C. GANGADHARAN, Under Secy .

For the management : Shri I. S. Sidhu .

ANNEXURE

AWARD

Passed on 27-10-2005

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

PRESENT

Central Govt. vide No. L-40011 / 14/96 - IR (DU ) dated 27th January, 1998 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Shrikant Shukla , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 57/2003

Ref. No. L - 12011/232/ 2002 - IR (B - II) Dt . 31-3-2003 "Whether the action of the Department of Telecommunication rep . through the Telecom Distt . Engineer , Hamirpur in denying payment of Remote 13470

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

Between

The General Secretary Union Bank Employees Union ( U.P. ) 628/M-33 , Murari Nagar , Fazidabad Road Lucknow (U.P. ) 226016

And

The Regional Manager Union Bank of India , Regional office, Gazipur

AWARD

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi referred the following dispute , No. L- 12011 /232 /2002- IR (B - II ) , dated 31-3-2003 for adjudication to Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court , Lucknow .

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in not considering the transfer of Shri Kumar Anand A physically handicapped employce , on the basis of rejection made by joint consultative committee , without giving any reason, is legal and justified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled for ?"

Trade union filed the statement of claim and the UnionBank of India filed its written statement disputing the claim.

During the course of proceeding parties requested that the case be taken up in the Lok Adalat and they will permitted to do so .

Case was taken up in the Lok Adalat today and the trade union General Secretary Sri S.D. Mishra files the compromise document A- 29 alongwith affidavit of the workman . The Asstt . Manager (P) of the Union Bank of India Sri M. R. Rehman too participated in the proceedings . The trade union General Secretary stated that during the proceedings the worker for whose benefits the case was spoused i.c. Kumar Anand has been promoted in the officer cadre and therefore the trade union with a view of maintain peace and harmony and the larger interest of the worker has compromised with the bank and the trade union does not want to press adjudication of issue any more . Sri Rehman, Asstt . Manager ( P) of the bank also confirmed the trade union version .

The parties present and verified the compromise letter A- 29 and affirmed that they have signed the document. In the circumstances issue is disposed of in terms of compromise of parties A- 29 . Award accordingly. A-29 shall be part of the award.

Lucknow

10-11-2005 SHRIKANT SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] BEFORE THE HON'BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW L.D. No. 57/2003 Between

The General Secretary Union Bank Employees Union (UP) 628/M - 33 , Murari Nagar, Faizabad Road Lucknow ( U.P. ) 226016

And The Regional Manager Union Bank of India Regional Office Gazipur

Sub: Compromise in Lok Adalat .

Sir

Parties have compromised in Lok Adalat . The TradeUnion does not pressed the adjudication of issue as the worker has been promoted in the officer cadre . Trade Union wants to maintain peace and harmony in the industry and the larger interest of the worker . The case be accordingly disposed of. The affidavit of concerned worker Sri Kumar Anand is attached herewith .

ForWorkman

(S.D. MISHRA )

General Secretary Union Bank Employees Union . UP Representative of UTI Opposite Party.

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4655. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टेलीकॉम फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी 19/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40011/41/ 2-002- आई आर ( डीयू) ] एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the: 16th November , 2005 S.O. 4655. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT19/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , No.1 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers 13471 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

in relation to the management of Telecom Factory and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2005 .

A Statement of claim has been filed by the National Federation of Telecom Employees (B.S.N.L. ) Union, on 30-6-2003 . (hereinafter referred to as the "Union " forshort).

[No. L -40011/41/2002 - IR (DU) ]

N. P. KESHAVAN, Desk Officer

4. The written statement has been filed by the employer through Assistant General Manager (Administration) on 14-8-2003 .

ANNEXURE

5. Rejoinder has been filed by the Union on 15-9-2003 .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1

MUMBAI

PRESENT

Justice Ghanshyam Dass

PresidingOfficer

Reference No. CGIT 19 of2003

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Telecom Factory.

And

Their workmen.

Appearances:

6.The admitted position which emerges on record is thatTelecom Factory, Mumbai is controlled by the Ministry of Communication , Department of Telecommunication , Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , New Delhi . It is a factory registered under the Factories Act, 1946. In November 1996, the management issued a Notice No. PS -6-2-96/97 (54) dated 27-1-96 calling applications from the department Grade 'D' workmen for examination for promotion to the Clerical cadre for one post of SC , one post of ST and 2 posts ofgeneral candidates. The vacancies were increased by a Corrigendum dated 19-12-96 . In view of the aforesaid notification , the eligible candidates submitted their applications and the management permitted 37 Group'D ' workmen to appear to the examination which was actually held on 25-3-1997 . The result of this examination has not yet been declared by the management.

For the Management : Mr. B.M. Masurkar, Adv.

For the Union

Mr. J.P. Sawant, Adv .

Maharashtra

State

7. It is contended by the Union that non - declaration ofresult of the examination on the part of the management isunfair.

Mumbai dated the 26th day of October , 2005

AWARD

1.This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub section 1 ofSection 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act for short) vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi Order No. L -400 11 /41/2002 - IR (DU) , dated 22- 4-2003 . The terms ofreference given in the schedule are as follows:

"Whether the demand of the National Federation of Telecom Employees BSNL Union from the Management ofTelecom Factory, Deonar, Mumbai for not declaring the result of departmental examination pertaining to promotion ofGroup 'D' employees to Group ' C ' is legal and fair ? If so , what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to ?"

8. In paragraph 10 of the Statement of claim it has been stated that out of 37 candidates who were permitted to appear for the aforesaid examination, 9 Group ' D ' workmen working in the management factory and who had fulfilled the required conditions and qualifications appeared for the departmental qualifying examination for promotion to Lower Division Clerk (Telecom Assistant ) conductedby the Maharashtra Telecom Circle on various times and they having qualified were promoted to the post of Lower Division Clerk and posted at various Telecom Accounts Branches of Maharashtra Telecom Circle . It is alleged in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Statement of claim and one post was reserved for Handicapped person for which dispute was raised from time to time before the Competent authority; but ultimately it was not accepted for the reasons that the Industrial dispute was filed by the Central Government and pending in this tribunal.

10. It is further alleged in other paragrphs of the Statement of claim that was raised before the Conciliation Officer [ Assistant Labour Commisiioner (C) Mumbai ] wherein management had agreed to declare the result by 31-3-2001 but the management did not honour that settlement . In view of the several dispute raised by erstwhile. All India Telegraph Engineering Union -Class 3.At the very outset, I may observe that the word ' not' appears to have been inadvertently typed. The word ' not' changes the entire meaning of the reference . The demand ofthe National Federation of Telecom Employees B.S.N.L. Union is for declaration of result and it is not for non -declaration of result. The Union wants that the result be declared and so the reference is to his tribunal to decide as to whether this demand is legal and fair .

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13472

III , the management accepted the seniorty claim of Shri A.I. Mukadam, Draughtsman and granted financial benifits and on a dispute raised by erstwhile Post and Telegraph Mazdoor Union , the promotion was granted to Shri R. B. Thakur . In the present case the management has taken a very rigid stand and the result of examination has not yet beendeclared with a result the promotion avenues ofGroup 'D' workmen have been blocked and they have been deprived of the benifits of the aforesaid examination .

Office Assistant in group ' C ' cadres . This new orders conferred higher pay scales and additional promotion avenues . The department of telecommunication was ordered to follow the implementation of new restructured cadre of Senior Telecom Office Assistant . For the purpose of implementing the aforesaid orders new posts in the cadre Senior Telecom Officer Assistants were to be created by simultaneously abolishing the existing sanctioned posts inclerical cadre in the ratio of2 : 1 . The post which remained surplus to be abolished/ adjusted against the posts as and when the vacancies arises . On account of implementation of these orders as many as 94 posts in Clerical cadre has become surplus . Out of these surplus posts 47 werc abolished simultaneously and 4 posts were abolished subsequently on account of retirement of Clerical staff. In view of these subsequent development it was imperative on the part of the employer to abide by the orders issued bythe Ministry and implementing the same in letters and spirit . Hence it was not possible for the management to declare the result and absorb the selected candidates . The allegations led in the Statement of Claim/Rejoinder had beendenied. It had been alleged that before the Conciliation Officer no Settlement had ever been arrived .

11. In the Rejoinder , the Union has started that after formation ofBharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. w.e.f. 1-10-2000, there is no change in service conditions of the workmen . There have been series of meetings between the Employer and the Union and the Standing Orders and also the Service Rules had been formulated as agreed to by both the parties . Thedispute raised by the present Union cannot be said to be belated because it had been vigilant through out since December 1998 as detailed in paragraph 6, 7 and 8. It is further stated that departmental examination for promotion to the cadre of Lower Divisional Clerk (TA) in group ' C ' is being held by the Chief General Manager, Maharashtra Telecom Circle, Mumbai and not by the employer . The management has not followed the rules and regulations framed for recruitment of Handicapped persons . The management had agreed to declare the results before the ConciliationOfficer but still the management did not declare the result which amounts to malpractice . The reasons and the circumstances given out by the management for not declaring the results are not correct and the management should be asked to declare the result .

13. The Union has filed the affidavit of Mr. R. D. Prabhu , ex -employee of the Telecom factory, in the capacity ofVice -President of the Union . He reiterated the facts stated in the Statement of Claim /Rcjoinders . In the cross examination he has stated that it is incorrect to say that restructuring came into force from 19-12-1996. It was introduced in the year 1999. He however , relied on Ex -W7 dated 3-5-1999 for the aforesaid statement . He was confronted that the document M - 5 dated 20-12-1996 to which he stated that he is not aware of the contents thereof. It is correct to say that Telecom department of the Government became B.S.N.L. with effect from 1-10-2000 . It is a public sector company. When the workers joined B.S.N.L. their pay scales were increased in group ' C ' and 'D' . It is correct to say that the workmen who are claiming promotion on Group ' C ' has accepted higher scales of pay on absorption in B.S.N.L. It is correct to say that the cmployees of the Telecom department opted for absorption in the B.S.N.L. The Office memorandum was accepted by the workman. I deny that workmen have given up their right of absorption.

14. The management filed the affidavit sworn and affirmed by Shri.P. K. Pawar , Asstt . General Manager (Admn . ) He reiterated the pleas taken up in written statement . He stated in the cross examination that there is no order of Government for not declaring the result of the examination. He stated that infact , it was within the purview of local management and no order was required from the Government . He state that the decision for non declaration of the result was taken by the local management in a 12. The management has come out with detailed reasons for not declaring the result . It is alleged that during the period of last 7 years , several changes in administrative and organizational set up have taken place . The Grade ' C ' and ' D ' staff have been transferred to other offices in the country onpermanent basis . Many of group ' D ' staff who had appeared in the departmental examination have also been transferred to other department on their promotion. The new promotion scheme like In-Situ promotion scheme , Assured Career Progression Scheme etc. introduced by the Telecom, New Delhi have been implemented. The Group ' C ' and ' D ' staff have been granted higher grades under these schemes . The then employer for the examination in question was Department of Telecommunication , New Delhi vide the present employer w.e.f. 1-10-2000 is Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. a Government enterprise having a separate entity under Coinpanics Act, 1959. The present dispute being taken after several years has become time barred . The result if declared at this juncture would not be possible to be inplemented and it will create many fold problems. It is contended that the examination was actually held but the result could not be declared in view of the letter No. 76/05 - IFSdt . 20-12-1996 introducing now restructuring cadre of Senior Telecom 13473 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

confidential file . It is true that the decision was not ever cimmunicated to the Union or to the aspirants . He further stated that it is not correct to say that Mr. Modhe, Driver has been posted as Clerk but in fact he was simply diverted to work as Receipt and Despatch Clerk .

15. The learned counsel for the workmen raised the following issues for determination:

(i ) Whether the action of the Management of Telecom Factory , Deonar, Mumbai in not declaring the results of the examination held on 24-3-1997 for promotion ofDepartmental Lower Grade Officials (Group ' D ' staff) to the post of Telecom Office Assistants (Clerical Cadre- Group ' C ' staff) in the pay scale of Rs. 975-166/- (pre- revised) is legal and justified ?

( ii ) Whether the proposed action of the Management in filling up the post of Telecom Office Assistants for attending the duties of Clerical nature from amongst the Motor Drivers instead of from amongst the successful candidates appeared for the examination held on 24-3-1997 is legal and justified?

16. I have heard the leamed counsel for the parties and gone through the records . No ruling is being cited by the learned counsel for the parties . The matter is to be decided on the strength of the evidence available on it .

(i ) Admittedly the vacancies were notified and the examination was held on 24-3-1997 for promotion of Departmental Lower Grade Officials ( Group 'D ' staff) . There is no dispute above this factual position . Admittedly, 37 candidates were permitted to appear . No result has been declared so far . The defense of the management is that the result could not be declared in view of restructuring of the services in the Telecom Department in view of the Govt. orders more specifically to the letter No. 76/ 95 - IFS dt . 20-12-1996, whereby a new cadre of Senior Office Assistant inGroup 'C'cadre was introduced. The new order conferred higher pay scales and additional promotion avenues. The exam was conducted by the Telecom Department and it became B.S.N.L. w.e.f. 1-10-2000 .

not exist being substituted by B.S.N.L. It appears to be a admitted position that on account of implementing of the restructuring policy , 94 posts in Clerical cadre had become surplus out of which 47 were abolished simultaneously and 4 posts were abolished subsequently . The direction ofthe Ministry were to be carried out by the management inletters and spirit. It is admitted position that out of 37 candidate who were permitted to appear for the examination , 9 group ' D ' workmen working in the management factory appeared for departmental qualifying examination for promotion of Lower Division Clerk (Telecom Assistant) conducted by Maharashtra Telecom circle and they having qualified were already promoted to the post of Lower Division Clerk. Further, there were other union in view of the dispute raised by erstwhile of Indian Telegraph Engineering Union Class - III . The management accepted the demand of this Union and the claim of seniority of Shri K.I. Mukadam, Draughtsman and granted financial benefits to him. Further , in view of the dispute raised by another erstwhile Post and Telegraph Mazdoor Union, the management granted promotion to Shri T.B. Thakur. It is further an admitted position that all the employees of Telecom Department opted for absorption inB.S.N.L. and the workmen were accordingly absorbed . Itisclear from the perusal ofthe record that restructuring was to be followed by the Telecom Department and that being so , the management did not declare the result. There appears to be no mala fide on the part of the management in not declaring the result and there appears to be no cause for causing any loss to the workmen . The directions of the Government have been carried out by B.S.N.L. in toto . The promotions have been granted as per rules to the Senior Telecom Office Assistants after abolishing certain post in this regard . It has also come into evidence ofMr. Pawar, Assistant General Manager that the decision ofnon -declaration of result has been taken in a confidential file. It is true that this decision has not been communicated either to the Union or to the aspirants but on account of this , the non -declaration of result cannot be said to be unfair or unjustifiable. The conduct of management in not declaring the result is not illegal.

(iii) The workman did raise the dispute regarding the appointment against the vacancy of Handicapped persons . This demand has not been accepted till now . 1 feel that the management should have considered this demand in view of the directions of the Governinent for following the rules in filling up the vacancy of Disabled/ Handicapped persons in letters and spirit . The non- acceptance of this demand by the management is not by itself sufficient to accept the demand of the workmen in toto at this juncture and ask the management to declare the result and implement it . The situation has changed a lot . The period of 8 years has already expired . Admittedly, a number of persons have already been granted promotion out of the examinees who appeared in the examination in (ii) It would have been realistic approach for the management to declare the result when it had held the examination but the situation is bit different in the instant case . It appears that the management should not have conducted the examination in the year 1997 when it had already received the letter in December 1996 for restructuring service conditions of the cadres . It appears to be improper use of the Office of the Authority of the person who procceded with the holding of the examination without caring for repercussions in view of the Govt . direction for restructuring of the service cadres. The demand of the workmen for declaring the result appears to be good enough on the face of it; but it is not acceptable at this juncture in view of the changed circumstances . The admitted position is that the Telecom Departinent does 478522

334

[PART II-SEC. 3(1) 13474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी-65/ 2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14011/5/2004- आई आर (डी यू) ]

एन. पी. केशवन, डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2005 question and several others have been transferred to other places. I do not feel it equitable and feasible to direct the management to declare the result and implement it . Even if the result is declared it would not serve any fruitful purpose unless it is implemented under the changed circumstances on account of formation of B.S.N.L. and lapse of time , the implementation of the declaration of result would not be practicable at all .

S.O. 4656.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. C.G.I.T. 65/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Garrison Engineer and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2005.

(iv) The learned counsel for the management submitted that the claim of the workman is time barred. This plea is not correct . There is no limitation provided under the Act nor the workmen in the case in hand slept over the matter . They did whatever they could. They agitated the matter since 1988. One reason or the other the matter could not be decided in favour of the workmen . The claim ofthe workmen cannot be rejected on the ground oflimitations .

[No. L - 14011 /5/2004 - IR (DU) ]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT , JAIPUR

Case No. C.G.LT. No. 65/2005

Reference No. L- 14011 /5/2004- IR(DU)

The Secretary ,

MES Employees Union ( INTUC) ,

Hanuman Hatta , Gali No. 1 ,

Bikaner

......Applicant -Union

Versus:

(v) The workmen also challenged in view of subsequent development during the pendency of the instant reference regarding filling up the post of Telecom Office Assistants in attending duties of clerical nature from amongst the Motor - Drivers instead of from amongst the successful candidates in question . In this regard this tribunal has to restrict itself to the terms of the reference only and not beyond that. If the tribunal travels beyond the terms of reference that can be stated to be without jurisdiction . However , on merits 1 feel that the allegations of the workmen in this regard is not correct . It has come into the evidence of the Assistant General Manager ( Admn) in his cross examination that Mr. Modhe , Driver has been posted as Clerk in OS Section but in fact his parent department is still Transport and he was simply diverted towork as Receipt and Despatch Clerk since he was sitting idle. Hence there appears to be nothing wrong on the part of the management in diverting and utilizing Modhe for working as Receipt and Despatch Clerk .

1. The Garrison Engineer (North) ,

MES, Bikaner.

2.Officer In Charge ,

17. In view of what has been discussed above , I conclude that the action of the management of Telecom Factory , Deonar, Mumbai for not declaring the result of departmental examination in question is legal and fair . The workmen are not entitled to any relief by this tribunal .

Military Farm,

The reference is accordingly answered.

Ambala Cantt (Haryana)-133001

Justice GHANSHYAM DASS, Presiding Officer

Non - applicants

PRESENT:

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2005

Presiding Officer : Sh. R. C. SHARMA.

: None

Forthe applicant

None

For the non - applicant :

06-10-2005

Date of award

का. आ. 4656.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, गैरीसन् इंजीनियर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण 13475 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । AWARD

[सं. एल-40012/184/90- आई आर ( डी यू) ]

एन. पी. केशवन , डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2005 The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause ' D ' of Sub -sections 1 and 2 (A) to Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ' Act' ) has referred this industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal which runs as under:-

"Whether the action of the Garrison Engineer (North), Bikaner and Officer In Charge, Military Farm, Ambala Courn in denying the claim of Shri Hem Singh Peon for 10% extra wages for discharging the düties of clerk from 1-7-91 to 31-5-93 and 1-6-93 to 28-2-94 inMilitary Farm, Depot, Bikaner and Military Farm , Ambala Cantt. Is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

S.O. 4657. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Iitdustrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government ficteby publishes the award (Ref. No.65/91 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Deptt. of Post and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2005,

[No. L-40012/184/90- IR (DU)]

N. P. KESAVAN, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 65/91

Sh . Dev Raj , S/o Sh. Piare Lal , Village Jundali , P.O. Model Town, Ambala City.

Applicant

Versus

2. On receipt of the reference in this COIT; the registered notices were issued to both the parties . On 31-8-2005 , the non - applicant through his representative put his appearance before the Court, but none appeared on behalf of the applicant - union despite the service of the registered notice. On the next date 16-9-2005 , the representative for the non - applicant was present, but none appeared on behalf of the applicant - union and on the next consecutive date 4-10-2004, both the parties abstained from appearing in the Tribunal. It was the responsibility of the applicant - union to put its appearance on the receipt of the registered notice and plead the claim by adducing the evidence . The applicant -union has failed to adduce any material on the record to adjudicate the dispute . Accordingly , the claim of the workman sponsored by the applicant - union is liable to be rejected.

The Senior Superintendent of Post Office , Ambala Division, Ambala - 133001.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

: Shri U. K. Agnihotri

For the workman

Forthe management : Shri K. K. Thakur

AWARD

Passed on 26-10-05

3. Consequently, the reference is answered in the negative against the applicant -union and in favour of the management and it is held that the action of the non- applicant in denying the claim of the workman Shri Hem discharging the duties Singh for 10per cent extra wages of clerk from 1-7-91 to 31-5-93 and 1-6-93 to 28-2-94 in Military Farm, Depot, Bikaner and Military Farm , Ambala Cantt. isjustified and the claim of the workman is rejected. An award is passed in these terms accordingly.

4. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication under Section 17 ( 1 ) of the Act.

The Central Govt. vide No.L-40012/ 184/90 - IR(DU) dated 3rd of June , 1991 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

R.C. SHARMA, Presiding Officer.

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2005

"Whether the action of the Post and Telegraph Deptt . in relation to their Ambala Cantt . in terminating the service of Shri Dev Raj S/o Piare Lal Branch Post Master , Civil LineBranch Post Master w.e.f. 1-7-88 is justified ? If not , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?"

2.Brief facts ofthe cases per workman is that he was appointed as Branch Post Master on 14-11-1983 and का. आ. 4657. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 ,चण्डीगढ़के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 65/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती

3423 G1/05-22 13476

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

from7-7-1987 to 1-7-1988 this department is not an industry and does not come under the purview of I.D. Act. Further the EDAs are governed by a separate set of rules of the department.

4.Workman filed rejoinder wherein he reiterated his claim and denied the assertions of the management .

5. Thereafter evidence ofboth parties was recorded. After hearing the final arguments, learned predecessor of this Court passed an award holding that the management is not an industry holding that in view of the 1996 JT ( 2 ) S.C 457 , Sub Divisional Inspector of Post Vaikam and Ors Vs. Theyyam Juseph, Hon'ble Supreme Court held that EDAs are not workman under the I.D. Act and provisions of the I.D. Act are not applicable. Thus following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court it was held that applicant is not a workman and the reference is not maintainable. Thereafter workman went in writ petition and Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the award vide its order dated 20-8-2004 holding as under:

"Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the controversy has now been set at rest by the Apex Court in GeneralManager Telecom Vs. S Sriniwas Rao 1998 ( 1 ) RSJ 43 wherein the Apex Court has held the respondent management to be an industry withinthe meaning of Section 2(j ) ofthe Act. In view ofthe above , the impugned award of the Labour Court dated 12-3-2003 is set aside . The controversy in hand is remanded back to the Labour Court to be adjudicated upon in terms of the reference made on it in accordance with law . "

remained posted as such in Civil Lines Ambala city post office. That while working, he fell ill in the month of October 1985 and he had to apply long leave in order to get himself treated from his illness . The said leave of the workman was refused on the ground that workman should have made some arrangement of some trained and experienced substitute as a branch Post Master during leave of the workman. That since it was difficult for the workman to arrange a trained and experienced substitute , when the applicant was seriously ill , he find it difficult and could notdo so, the authorities instead of realizing the difficulties of the workman forced the workman to submit his resignation by giving an assurance to the workman that as and when the workman would recover from his illness , he would be taken back and on pressure and also on the assurance the workman was made to submit his resignation w.e.f. 15-10-1985 and there after workman after fully recovering from the illness went to the authorities for seeking permission to resume his duties as branch Post Master, but he was not allowed to resume his duties and thereafter he was taken back on duty only on 7-7-1987 . The workman started working again w.e.f. 7-7-1987 with the same zeal and devotion . That on 1-7-1988 workman was told that his services were not required as one Jasbir Singh who had some political influence has to be accommodated. That on 1-7-1988 he was removed from the service . The workman had already put in more than 240 days from 7-7-1987 to 1-7-1988 and as such he can not be removed from service without following the provisions of I.D. Act , 1947 and thereafter , raised his demand for reinstatement .

6. Thereafter arguments in details were heard advanced by the learned counsel for the parties .

7. Learned counsel for the management submitted that the action of the management in termination of the services of Dev Raj w.e.f. 1-7-1988 isjustified. He joined his service on 7-7-1987 . He submitted that earlier also he was appointed as extra Departmental Packer on 14-11-1983 and in October 1985 he submitted his resignation on 15-10-1985 which was duly accepted. Thereafter in July 1987 a post of extra departmental Branch Post Master fell vacant and Dev Raj was appointed on this post on 7-7-1987 and w.e.f. 1-7-1988 his services were dispensed with . There was no violation of Sections 25F, G and H despite that from 7-7-1987 to 1-7-1988 in a preceding calendar year he has completed 240 days and it is not disputed.

3. The management filed written statement wherein denied the allegations but admitted that the workman was appointed as Extra Departmental Packer and not branch PostMaster w.e.f. 14-11-1983 . There is no evidence and record of the leave etc. and further denied that the applicant expressed his inability to provide trained substitute nor there is any application for grant of leave. The workman submitted his resignation . There is no record to the effect regarding seeking permission to resume duty , his resignation voluntarily submitted was accepted and question of giving permission to resume duty does not arise . No assurance was given . Further the post of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master Dhulkot fell vacant dueto resignation of the incumbent and the applicant was engaged on ad hoc arrangement on purely temporary basis and till selection is made from the candidates sponsored by the employment exchange. The applicant was engaged as extra Departmental Branch Post Master Dhulkot purely on temporary and on ad hoc basis as per departmental rules . Thereafter Jasbir Singh was selected from the candidates sponsored by employment exchange . The workman was not taken as name of the workman was not sponsored by the employment exchange , so his name was not considered. Workman worked as EDBPM Dhulkot

8. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the management that for the regularization of service as EDA Department of Communication P & T vide notification dated 10-9-1964 as approved by the Central Government framed rules which itself a complete code which provide rules for all categories . In these rules which are called as The Post and Telegraphs Extra Departmental Agents (Conduct and Service) Rules, 1964 provide for appointing authority, pension, leave , termination of service, nature of penalties, procedure for imposing a penalty, appeal , period of limitation for appeals , form and contents of appeals etc.

13477 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

further, authority is not obliged to comply with the said provisions , 2005.

There was a clause that if any doubt arises as to who is the appropriate appointing authority in any case , the matter shall be referred to the Government whose decision thereon shall be final .

10. While summing up his arguments learned counsel for the management submitted that earlier also the learned predecessor has held that the post of the workman was that of extra departmental agent and they are civil servant. He submitted that as the workman Dev Raj in view of the law referred, despite his completion of 240 days he is not entitled to any relief being he is a civil servant . He submitted that reference may kindly be decided in favour of the management holding that workman is not entitled to any relief in view of the latest law of 2005 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and workman is also not entitled to any backwages.

11. In reply to the submissions of the learned counsel of the management , learned counsel for the workman submitted that workman was appointed on 7-7-1987 and his services were terminated on 1-7-1988 he worked for more than 240 days and MW1 also admitted this fact . He also submitted that he was earlier also appointed . He also submitted that JT 1996 (2 ) of the Supreme Court page 457 isheld no more a good law in view of 1997 (7) S C page 437 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that in view of the decision of the seven Judges Bench in Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board case where it is held that in a establishment /management some staff can be work man and in view of the judicial discipline , the above judgment is to be followed and the law laid down in Theyyam Joseph case cannot be treated as correct law . He also submitted that as workman has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding to the date of termination and this fact has not been disputed by the management also and the services of the workman were terminated without complying the provisions of Section 25F , the termination isbad and the workman is liable to be reinstated. He further submitted that where provisions of the I.D. Act override the provisions of other law , other law is to be ignored. In this regard he firstly referred to I LLJ 1982 Bhaskaran Vs. Sub Divisional Officer page 248 , the Hon'ble Kerala High Court has decided in this writ petition two questions in a writ filed by the P& T Department ( 1 ) whether the P& T Department is an industry and ( 2) whether the Govt . employees , who are governed by the service rules, are outside the preview of the I.D. Act . He submitted that both these questions were decided in favour of the workman holding that provisions of Section 25F, G & H have over riding effect . Anything incosistent contained in any other law which cannot be given effect to . They have simply to be ignored, if the establishment in question is an industry . It is for the state to act if it thinks that Govemment servant who are also workmen , should not getdouble benefits. It an amend the I.D. Act or bring in other legislation . AIR 2001 SC672 Vikramaditya Pandey V's . Industrial Tribunal and another , wherein it is held by 9. He submitted that in view of the above rules , the condition of services applicable on the workman Dev Raj , despite the fact that workman has completed 240 days , is not entitled for any relief. There was no violation of provisions of Sections 25F ,G and H and any other provisions . He submitted that Dev Raj is a civil servant and not entitled to any relief. He also submitted that therefore , relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court JT 1996 (2) S.C. 457, wherein it is held that workman is a civil servant despite that the management is an industry butworkman is a civil servant . He further submitted that the post was filled up after following the due procedure through employment exchange and as the name of the applicant was not sponsored by the employment cxchange . He also referredto a latest judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2005 (2) SCT, Allahabad Jal Sansthan Vs. Daya Shankar Rai and Anr. Wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to hold that grant of full back wages mere as a consequence of reinstatement , is no more a good proposition in the change circumstances . Industry is not to be compelled to pay for the period the workman was not working for it. Management also relied on JT 1997 (4) S. C. 560 Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi and Ors . Vs. State ofBihar and Ors . wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that termination of service of temporary employees who were only daily wagers-held daily wager had no right to posts and their disengagement is not arbitrary- since they are temporary employees working on daily wages , their disengagement from service cannot be treated under I. D. Act, 2005 ( 1 ) SCT, Mahender Lal Jain Vs. Indore Development Authority , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that daily wagers and adhoc employees do not hold any regular post. They are appointed for some specific work. Their appointments are in violation of Article 14 in as much as they are not appointed by any competent authority in accordance with the rules and procedure . Such appointments are void ab initio being opposed to public policy . Their service conditions are not determined . They cannot claim regularization /permanency against regular posts . 1988 S.C. page 1700 Miss A. Sundarambal Vs. Government of Goa, Daman and Diu and others , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that though School is Industry, teacher is not workman dispute of termination of service ofteacher cannot be referred under the Act, 1999(4) SCT 731 Rajesh Sharma Vs. Presiding Officer , Labour Court, Chandigarh , it is held that I.D. Act, 1947 , Sections 25F and G, daily wagers-short term appointment on daily wage basis without following the procedure prescribed in recruitment rules-workers appointed against a specific work for a specific period not in accordance with the procedure prescribed are not entitled to the benefits of Sections 25F and G of I.D. Act , if they are not allowed to continue any 13478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005 / AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ]

Cantt. in terminating the services of Shri Dev Raj son of Piara Lal , Branch Post Master Civil Lines Branch Post Master w.e.f 1-7-88 isjustified and the workman deserves reinstatement. As regards payment of wages , in view of the law referred by the management the workman has left to the court to decide and they did not argue further.

13. In view of the above written arguments , oral submissions , oral evidence and documents , I have found that firstly workman case is that he was initially apppointed as Branch Post Master on 14-11-1983 and when suddenly fell ill in October 1985, he applied for long leave but not allowed and thereafter on the assurance of the management resigned from the service that he will be taken later on but was not taken later on . Thereafter he was again appointed BPM on 7-7-1987 and worked as such up to 1-7-88 when influencial person Jasbir was appointed and he was disengaged on 1-7-88 after completion of 240 days of service . The management denied these allegations and submitted that he himself resigned vide Ex.MI and also that he was not earlier appointed branch post master and appointed as packer . Thereafter the management on ad hoc basis appointed him on 7-7-87 as branch post master and when regular incumbent was appointed after adopting regular process , his services were disengaged on 1-7-1988.

the Hon'ble S.C service regulations do not prevail over Industrial Disputes Act , 1996 (4) SCT 697 Hans Raj Vs. Presiding Officer , Labour Court Patiala , 1999 ( 1 ) RSJ 58 Trishla Devi Vs. The Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , UT, Chandigarh wherein it is held that appointment of the petitioner for fixed period of 89 days again and again with gaps is an unfair labour practice . Similar view has been taken in 1998 (2 ) RSJ 55 Shimla Devi Vs. P.O. Labour Court Bhatinda and others , 1998 ( 1 ) RSJ 703 Bhikku Ram Vs. the Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Rohtak in which it has been held that thejob continue to be required by the employer. Held that employer has not exercised his right to terminate the services of the petitioner in good faith and the work did not ceased amounts to unfair labour practice , 2003 ( 2 ) SCT 1013 S.M Nilajkar and Ors Vs. Telecom District Manager Karnataka wherein it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that termination of services of workman engaged in a scheme or project may not amount to retrenchment within the meaning of sub - clause (bb ) subject to the following conditions being satisfied ( i) that the workman was employed in a project or scheme of temporary duration , ( ii ) the employment was on a contract, and not as a daily wager simplicitor, which provided inter alia that the employment shall come to an end on the expiry of the scheme or project; and ( iii ) the employment came to an end simultaneously with the termination of the scheme or project and consistently with the terms of the contract, (iv) the workman ought to have been apprised or made aware of the above said terms by the employers at the commencement of employment . 2000 ( 84) FLR 896 State ofUP Vs. Rajendra Singh Butola and another wherein the Hon'ble S. Chas held that daily wagers worked for years. his services were dispensed with without following procedure provided , procedure for retrenchment was required to be followed termination order set aside . reinstatement with full back wages ordered.

14. As the carlier facts are not required to decide this case whether he resigned or not on 15-10-1985 vide Ex.MI , as workman case is that he was reappointed as Branch Post Master on 7-7-87 and he worked up to 1-7-88 and disengaged on 1-7-1988 and there is no dispute that as on 1-7-1988 he completed 240 days . There is no dispute between the parties regarding status of the workman. Workman's contentions are that he was not appointed on ad hoc basis and management's case is that he was appointed on ad hoc basis as per decument Ex.M4 which is the application of the workman for the post of branch postmaster . In view of the above submissions now man dispute between the parties remains as also agreed firstly thatwhether applicant comes under the definition of workman under the 1.D. Act , 1947 ( ii ) whether rules related to the conditions of services of the Post and Telegramme EDA are complete code in itself and provisions of I.D. Act are not applicable , ( iii ) whether workman is entitled for the relief claimed by him as he has completed 24t ) days and the management is not justified in terminating his services .

12. While summing up his arguments learned counsel for the workman submitted that in view of the above law referred by him and that workman has completed more than 240 days in calendar year preceding to the date of terminationwhich is not disputed by the management although , there are separate rules made by the P & T Department but these rules are to be ignored if inconsistent with the provisions of the I.D. Act . These rules are silent and inconsistent in view of the provisions of Section 25 F of the 1.D.Act 1947. Learned counsel for the workman further argued that in view of the above law referred by him, the workman who has completed 240 days in a preceding year from the date of his termination , which is notdisputedby the management . That besides completing of 24t) days , the provisions of Section 25F were not complied with at the time of termination of the workınan, the management has failed to prove that the action of the Post and Telegraph Department in relation to their Ambala

15. Both partics are in agreement that workman has completed 241 ) days in a calendar year preceding to his termination on 1-7-1988 . I have on record found that workman Dev Raj has filed his affidavit Ex . W1 and Ex. W2 the appeal . On the other hand , management filed Ex. MI resignation of the workman , Ex . M2 affidavit of management witness Mr. Raijada , Ex . M3 when workman was appointed as packer in the year 1983 , Ex . M4 is the application for appointment as Branch Post Master which was forwarded by postal authorities , Ex . M5 is the recommendation for 13479 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

appointment, Ex. M 7 is the order on appeal and Ex. M8 is the charge by Jasbir Singh. As regards appointment of Jasbir Singh in place of Dev Raj , it is the case of the management that Jasbir Singh was appointed after due procedure of appointment as per law and his name was sponsored by the employment exchange whereas the name of the workman Dev Raj was not sponsored by the employment exchange and thus his name was not considered . Dev Raj was appointed on ad hoc basis till regular arrangement is made.

workman wherein it is mentioned that on the application of the workman adhoc arrangements were made. It is mentioned in Ex.M 4 by Department for recommending his case as that it is for your kind information that Shri Ram Dass BPM, Dhulkot has submitted his resignation on 6-7-87, as he got job in MES adhoc arrangement has been made vice him with telephonic approval of your good office on 7-7-87 through mail oversear Ambala city and Dev Raj son of Piara Lal has been given the charge , resignation and charge report are enclosed . It is , therefore , requested that regular arrangement through employment exchange may kindly be made. After the appointment of the petitioner, the management made arrangement for regular appointment under the rules which are also applicable for appointment purpose.

16. Both the parties are also in agreement that there are rules relating to conditions and service of the post of EDA . The post of BPM is one of an employee appointed under the above rules . Management has contested this case submitting that workman was appointed on adhoc basis and that he is a civil servant and the above service rules are complete code in itself is applicable on the workman. Further that applicant is not a workman as defined under the 1.D. Act, 1947 being civil servant . In view of the law referred by the workman, I am of the considered view thatapplicant is covered under the definition ofworkman as defined under Section 2 ( s) of the I.D. Act , 1947 as he is fully covered under the above definition . As regards. applicability of the provisions of the I.D. Act, 1947 workman has relied on Section 25J of the I.D. Act, 1947 i.e. effect of law inconsistent with this chapter .

20. I have also found that management's case on the appointment of Dev Raj is that he was appointed on adhoc basis as proved by record and though that the workman had completed 240 days in one calendar year proceeding to the date of termination is of no help . The workman has relied on several judgements that workman has completed 240 days the termination is void , but the management has relied a judgement only on this point in Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi's case (supra) and 1999 (4 ) S.C.T. Rajesh Sharma Vs. P.O. Labour Court, Chandigarh wherein it is held that termination of service of temporary employees whowere only daily wagers held daily wager had no right to posts and their disengagement is not arbitrary-since they are temporary employees working on daily wages , their disengagement from service cannot be treated under I.D. Act. It is also not an unfair labour practice . Though provisions of I.D. Act Sec . 25F are applicable in other cases . It also held that contentions of the workmen were that termination of service is in violation of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, 1947. The question is whether termination can be said to be in violation of the Section 25F. It is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that such termination cannot come under the provisions of the I.D. Act, 1947. Hence I hold thatdisengagement is not arbitrary .

17. In view of the above provisions of law U/s . 25J and in view of the law referred by the workman in I LLJ page of the year 1982 pages 248 , 249, judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Bhaskar Vs. SDO, it is held that provisions af Section 25FG & H have over riding effect . Anything inconsistent contained in any other law which cannot be given effect to . They have simply to be ignored, if the establishment in question is an industry . It is for the state to act if it thinks that Government servant who are also workmen , should not get double benefits. There is no dispute between the parties that P & T Department is an industry.

18. As I have already held above that although there is a complete provisions of rules and regulations framed by the management for the workman but in view of Section 25J and above law referred , I am of the considered view that as the provisions of the I.D. Act , 1947 are having effect over the existing rules ofthe management , the rules ofthe managements relates to conduct and service are not enforceable and simply to be ignored .

21. In view ofthe above law and facts it is proved by the management that the workman was appointed on adhoc basis till regular arrangement is made , though the workman has completed more than 240 days of service but his case is not covered U/ s . 25F of the I.D. Act . In view of the above , it is held that termination of the workman is not illegal and there is no violation of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, 1947. Therefore , the action of the Post and Telegraph Deptt . in relation to their Ambala Cantt. in terminating the services of Shri Dev Raj son of Piara Lal , Branch Post Master Civil Line Branch Post Master w.e.f. 1-7-88 is justified and workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered accordingly. Central Govt. be informed.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

19. In view of the detailed written arguments and oral submissions advanced by both the parties , I have found that in view of Ex . M4 as not challanged by the 13480

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4658.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं . II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2004 का 94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/73/2004- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th November, 2005

S.O. 4658. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 94 of 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-11- 05

[No. L - 12012/73 /2004 - IR (B-I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

Shri B. Biswas , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D.Act . , 1947.

Reference No. 94 of 2004

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India, Patna and their workman.

Appearances:

None

Onbehalf of the workman :

Onbehalf of the employers

Mr. R.N.Ganguly , Advocate .

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Banking.

Dated, Dhanbad, the 25th October , 2005.

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide theirOrder No. L- 12012 /73 /2004 -IR(B- I ) , dated, the 7th July, 2004.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank ofIndia, in terminating the services of Shri Raj Kishore Prasad instead of regularising him on completing 240 days of continuous service in the Central Stationery Department of State Bank of India, Patiliputra , Patna, Biharis legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled? "

2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . No written Statement was also filed on their behalf. Management , however, made appearance through their authorised representative. It transpires from the record that registered notices and show cause notice were issued to the workman/ sponsoring union for causing their appearance. In terms of Rule 10 (B) of the I.D. Central Rules, 1957 it is mandatory on the part of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union to file statement of claim complete with relevant documents . List of reliance and witnesses before the Tribunal within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order of reference . The concerned workman/ sponsoring union not only violated the above rules but also even did not consider necessary to respond to the notice issued by this Tribunal . Gesture of the concerned workman/ sponsoring union if is taken into consideration will expose clearly that they are not interested to proceed with the hearing of the case . Under such circumstances , this Tribunal also finds no ground to adjourn the case suo motu for days together for taking steps by the workman/ sponsoring union . Hence the case inclosed and accordingly a ' No dispute ' Award is passed inthis reference presuming non - existence of any industrial dispute between the parties .

B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4659.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी- 155/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को14- 11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/01/2001- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th November, 2005 S.O. 4659. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (I.D. No. 155 / 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court- I , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , 10

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

which was received by the Central Government on 14-11-05

3481

13481

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[No. L - 12012/01 /2001 -IR (B -I)]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR -COURT- I CHANDIGARH.

Case No. I.D155/ 2001

Sh. Sada Ram , C/o Sh. J.N.Kapoor, 33-34, Bank Enclave , Rajouri Garden,

NewDelhi.

Applicant Versus

The Dy. General Manager,

StateBank of India,

Z.O. Sector 8 -C, Chandigarh . 160017.

Respondent

Appearances:

For the workman

Shri J.N.Kapoor

: Shri V.K.Sharma For the management

AWARD

Passed on 27-10-2005

CentralGovt.vide No.L. 12012/01 /2001 - IR-(B - I) dated 11th of April , 2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Sada Ram w.e.f. 27-1-90 is just and legal ? Ifnot , what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. In claim statement it is pleaded by the workman that he was appointed at SBI , G.T.Road, Panipat Branch as temporary messenger w.e.f. 4-12-89 against permanent and regular vacancy and worked there up to 27-1-90 for 44 days continously and his services were terminated on 27-1-90 without notice or speaking order . No charge sheet was issued nor any enquiry was held . The workman was paid daily wages against the rules of Bipartite Settlement . It is submitted that after the termination of the workman, the management appointed large number of new employees at the same branch like Hanumant , Baljit , Ram Niwas, Vijay Kumar, Ram Kumar and Ram Mehar on daily wages on the same terms and conditions on which the workman was appointed . It is submitted that termination of the workman is in violation of the provisions of Sastri Award and Section 25G of the ID Act 1947. It is further submitted that management did not consider the claim of the workman while recruiting fresh persons as messengers/peon in violation of Section 25H of the 1.D.Act, 1947. Workman represented to the management to re - employ him at the time of fresh recruitment but the management did not consider his claim .

3. That the management has been innovating crooked and unfair methods and system as to employ large number of staff in subordinate cadre on daily wage or temporary basis depriving them even the minimum wages and to employ them as badlis , casuals or temporaries and to continue them for a long time is unfair labour practice. That thebranch manager also did not issue service certificate to the workman . It is submitted that in terms of Bipartite Settlement dated 27-10-1988 and 9-1-90 between the bank and the Union , the daily wagers would be eligible for permanent appointment in the bank provided they have completed minimum 30 days temporary service in a calander year between 1-7-75 to 14-8-1991 and in view of the settlement the workman submitted his application to the branch manager but the workman was not called for interview for malafide reasons , though the bank absorbed all the employees who worked during the relevant period but the case ofthe workman was not considered for malafide reasons . The bank has appointed large number of persons after 27-1-90 but the management will fully ignored the claim of the workman . The above referred persons who were employed after the termination of the service of the workman, were later on interviewed and absorbed them in the bank permanently . The management also did not consider various representations of the workman and action ofthe management not re - employing the workman is illegal, unjust and amounts to unfair labour practice and victimisation and it is prayed that workman may be reinstated in the service with retrospective effect with back wages and continuity of service.

4. In written statement the management has taken preliminary objection that case is highly belated and applicant is not a workman. On merits it is submitted that petitioner was engaged on different dates for a period of44 days as casual labourer on daily basis against payment of Rs.20 perjob from December 89 to January 90 as and when required depending upon the adhoc requirements of the branch. It is submitted that petitioner was never appointed by the bank , therefore the question of his alleged termination does not arise and there was no need to pass any speaking order and give notice to the workman. It is submitted that petitioner was engaged as a casual labour and there is no question of violation of any settlement/law. It is further submitted that bank has been engaging the requisite casual labourer depending on its adhoc requirements from time to time and available labourer was being engaged as and when required and there is no question of offering any appointment to the workman arid Section 25 G& H of the I.D. Act is not applicable to the workman as he is not a workman . The petitioner did not submit any application for being considered in the bank for permanent absorption in subordinate cadre. Regarding the persons appointed after his termination, it is submitted that eligible persons were considered and appointed on merits base as per bank norms who applied and since the [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13482

petitioner never applied for being considered as per the agreement, the question of any malafide as alleged does notarise . Other contentions of the workman were also denied by the management and it is prayed that claim may be dismissed and reference may be decided in favour of the bank and against the management .

5.Rejoinder also filed by the workman reiterating the claim made in the claim statement.

6.Toprove his case workman filed his affidavit Ex.W1 in evidence and also appeared as WW1 . The management filed the affidavit of MWI N.K.Griotra who proved his affidavitEx . MI . He also relied on Scheme Ex . MX both these witnesses were cross - examined at length .

wasmanipulated and was planned and for this reasons the management terminated the services of the workman and appointed all the new six persons referred, so that they become eligible and finally absorbed them that thousands ofdaily wager were permanently absorbed in whom directly or indirectly some powerful persons were interested and even if a person could not be called in an interview but whentaken up the case in the ALC , the management held a special interview . In view of the above submissions it is prayed that action of the management to terminate the services of the workman w.e.f. 27-1-1990 is unjust . He prayed that workman may be reinstated in service with consequential benefits from the date of his termination . Workman also relied on documents i.e. Bipartite Settlement filed by both the management and the workman.

8. On the other hand authorised representative of the management submitted that workman has no case. The workmandid not complete 240 days within a calander year to attract the provisions of Section 25F ofthe I.D. Act 1947 and it was not obligatory for the management to comply with the Section 25F . In the present case the management has not violated the provisions of Section 25F. The management also relied on 1997 (3) RSJ 298 Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi Vs. State of Bihar and others , 2001 ( 1 ) RSJ State Bank of India Vs. Industrial Tribunal Hyd and another 680 1994 PLR page 310 Karnal Central Coop Bank Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, AIR 1992 S.C 1414 Bhoop Singlı Vs. UOI. The case ofthe workman in nut shell is that his services were terminated in violation of the provisions of Section 25G of the I.D. Act 1947. In reply to this the management submitted that Section 25 G of the I.D. Act has no relevancy inthis case as it deals with the procedure for retrenchment . Inthe absence of agreement between the employer and the workman in this behalf the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed in that category, unless for the reasons to be recorded the employer retrenches any other workman. The workman is mainly stressing that he was not given an opportunity for permanent appointment in the bank in terms of Settlement dated 27-10-1988 and 9-11-1991 between SBI Staff Federation and the bank for giving such opportunity to the ex -temporary/casual/daily wages employees who had worked in the bank for more than 30 days however subject to their prescribed eligibility and suitability on the basis of interview . In order to give this opportunity to such employees , an advertisement was given in the leading newspapers inviting applications from such eligible employees . The candidates who had applied in response to the advertisements given by the bank , were called for the interview and considered for appointment on the basis oftheir suitability in the interview . The workman did not apply for the saine though his is falsly pleading that he had given his application to the branch manager SBI G.T. Road Painpat Branch. The workman did not produce any evidence to prove that he had given his application . He 7.Both parties filed their written arguments as well as advanced oral arguments . Learned counsel for the workman in written arguments as well in oral arguments submitted that it is undisputed that workman was eligible for appointment and for permanent absorption in the bank service. Management has admitted that workman fulfilled all the requisite qualification for being absorbed permanently. He submitted that only difficulty of the management is that workman did not apply or submit his application, therefore , he could not be considered and this is not a fault of the bank . He further urged that workman requested the branch manager for issuance of service certificate which was a precondition for submitting the application as the same was to be attached with the application. The branch manager did not issue service certificate. Then workman submitted his application without the certificate to the branch Manager SBI , G.T. Road Panipat but the workman was not called for interview for malafide reasons which might have been rejected for want ofservice certificate . It is also argued that in terms of para 518 of Sastry Award it was obligatory on the part of the branch manager to issue service certificate but he wilfully violated the sad statutory provisions. He also submitted that all have been absorbed except workman. His services were illegally terminated in violation of the Sastry Award and Section 25G of the I.D. Act 1947. The management for malafide reasons and with a view to adjust their own persons terminated the services of the workman and they followed unfair labour practice and violated the provisions ofSection 25H of the I.D. Act . He also submitted that as per earlier instructions only those temporary employces / daily wagers who had worked for 30 days in a calendar year between 1-7--75 to 31-7-1988 were eligible for permanent absorption . These instructions were modified vide personnel Deptt. SBI , Chandigarh LHO Note No. 4940 dated 2-8-91 according to which it has been decided that the outer date for completing the minimum required temporary service may be extended from 31-3-1988 to 14-8- 1991. Accordingly who have completed the required minimum service during the period 1-7-75 to 14-8-1991 will be given a chance for being considered for permanent absorption . That the above change in the eligibility criteria 13483 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

State Bank of India and the Union of the Bank employees i.e. Union of workman and as circulated by them that daily wager employees or terminated employees would be eligible for permanent absorption in bank's service who have completed 30 days in any calander year during the period 1-7-75 to 14-8-1991 .

110. The case of the management is that the management was not obliged to follow the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act as it is no body's case that workman completed 240 days continuous service in terms as defined under the I.D. Act . The workman in this case is saying that his services were terminated in violation of provisions of Section 25F of the 1.D. Act . He did not complete 240 days in a calander yearto attract the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act in a year . The workman has taken a plea that he was not given any opportunity for permanent employment in the bank in terms of settlement dated 27-110-1988 and 9-1-1991 arrived at between the bank management and the workman Union for giving such opportunity to ex - workman who have worked in the bank for more than 30 days however subject to their suitability on the basis of interview . In order to give this opportunity to such employees , an advertisements weregiven in the leading newspapers inviting applications from such eligible employees . The candidates who have applied in response to the above advertisements were called forinterview and considered for appointment on the basis oftheir stability in the bank.

could have summoned the banks record or the branch manager to whom he had allegedly given his application. Moreover this issue is beyond the scope of reference made to this court thus this issue should not be taken into consideration . It is further argued that since workman has raised this Industrial Disputes almost after 10 years of his alleged termination , he could have moved to the bank and the machinery under the I.D. Act when other person calied for interview . He apparently slept over his rights and that equity also does not help such person and it help to the person who do equity . Their Lordship of Supreme Cotirt in Bhoop Singh Vs. Union of India and others held that It is expected of a Govt . servant who has a legitimate claim to approach the court for the relief he seeks within a reasonable time , assuming no fixed period of limitation applies . It is further submitted that the appointment in terms of settlement came to end w.e.f. 31-3-97 and as such these settlements are not in force as on date . Copies ofjudgements dated 15-5-98 and 18-9-98 of Orissa High Court were referred wherein Hon'ble High Court had dismissed the writ petition of the candidates who were wait listed and sought appointment on the basis of interview held in terms of these settlements . Even the Hon'bie Supreme Court had the dismissed the special leave petitions on merits filed by them.He further sulımitted while summing up his arguments that as the workman has no case as he was not absorbed due to his own fauit as he did not appiy with the bank and at present the policy is not in existence and the reference may be decided in favour of the management and against the workman and the workman is not entitled to any relief as the termination of the workman was just and legal . He also submitted that virtually the workman has not challenged the termination and also did not led evidence in this regard . He only challenged that his non absorption is bad and unjust and workman should have been taken and empanelled despite he did not apply for his absorption in view of the policy of the bank .

11. The present workman did not apply for the same though he is falsly pleading that he had given his application to the branch manager SBI G.T. Road Panipat Branch . The workman did not produce any evidence that he had given any application . He could have summoned the bank record. The onus was on the workman . It is fabricated story of the workman that no experience / service certificate was issued as he did not apply at all . In the circuftistances It is the fault of the workman and not of the bank when he did not apply . The workman was not called for interview as he did not apply in response to the advertisement given by the bank in Newspapers when all other thousands of employees applied and got absorption and now the scheme is over. He also submitted that workman has no where challenged whether his termination is bad as per reference. His insistence is that he should have been absorbed in view of the policy, agreement entered between the bank management and union and advertisement were issued in the Newspapers . He also submitted that he did not apply but he has taken an excuse that he applied for issuance of certificate but the branch inanagement did not issue him the same . So he did not apply and later after the scheme was over he applied.

12. 1 have found as per entire record , that workman did not file any document or did not make efforts to summon the relevant record of the bank and solely relied on his oral evidence . Contention of the workman is that he 9. In view of the above submission and my perusal or oral evidence , written arguments and oral submission ofboth the parties , have found that in this case the Central Govt . sent the reference for adjudication that whether the action of the management of State Bank of India Chandigarh terminating the services of Shri Sada Ram w.c.f. 27-1-90 and retaining his juniors into employment as fresh hands on the same post is just and legal . Whereas the man contentions and plea of the workman is that as per affidavit Ex . WI and claim statement that he was eligible to be empanelled in terms of Bipartite Settlement and to be absorbed permanently but the management neither interviewed nor empanelled him whereas the management appointed many persons as daily wager after illegal termination of the workman and later on absorbing them permanently in terms of agreement . Thus the case is that after the services of thousands of workmen came to an end , an agreement was made between the management of

3423 G1 /05-23 3 ( ii) ]

[PART II-SEC .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13484

applied for the certificate with the Branch Manager but Manager did not issue . As per management this is concocted story that he applied with the branch manager forissuance of service certificate .

अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी-85/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/332/97- आईआर( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2005 13. In view of my above discussion , I did not find any evidence on this point except the oral evidence or affidavit of the workman that he applied for the issuance of service certificate with the branch manager. Burden to prove is on the workman and workman has to discharge his burden.His oral affidavit is not sufficient to prove that he applied with the bank and bank did not issue the certificate. He also did not make efforts to summon bank record . Controversy is very short now. The termination of workman is not challenged by the workman in his pleadings. In this manner he simply challenged non - absorption of the workman in view of their announced policy in the newspapers is bad.

S.O. 4660. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( I.D. 85/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court- I Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workınan , which was received by the Central Government on 14-11- 2005

[No. L- 12012/332/97- IR (B -I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer 14. Therefore , I am of the considered view that workman also failed to prove that non - calling him in interview and non - absorption in view of the scheme ofthe bank, is not legal and not justified because workman did nto apply to the bank for absorption. Workman did not file any oral or documentary evidence in this regard.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. L.D 85/98

...Applicant

Sh. Sewa Ram, S/o Sh. Giani Ram, Village Dadola, Tehsil &Distt. Panipat- 132103

Versus

...Respondent

TheDy. General Manager, State Bank of India , Z.O. Sector 8 -C, Chandigarh - 160017

APPEARANCES

Shri J.N. Kapoor

Shri V.K. Sharma

For the workman: For the management:

AWARD

Passed on 27-10-2005

Central Govt. vide No. L. 12012/332 /97 - IR-(B - 1 ) dated 29th of April , 1998 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication:

15. I am, therefore , of the considered view that non- absorption , termination of the workman , non - calling for the workman for interview and non - empanelling him by the management is not illegal and unjust on the ground solely that workman did not apply at all . It is proved by the management . Therefore , the workman is not to be reinstated and the management has not violated the provisions of Section 25F of the 1.D. Act , 1947. As regards reference, workman did not try to prove it . Rather management proved the reference in their favour , I hold that even the termination ofthe workman as alleged and in reference to this Court for adjudication that action of the bank is just and legal is not challenged specifically by the workman in this case. As I have already held that the act of the management in not empanelling, not calling for interview and his non- absorption is also just and legal as the workman did not apply at all . Therefore , in view of the above, I hold that action of the management of State Bank of India Chandigarh terminating the services of Shri Sada Ram w.e.f. 27-1-90 and retaining his juniors into employinent as fresh hands on the same post is just and legal and the workman is not entitledto any relief. The reference is answered accordingly . Central Govt be informed. File be consigned to record . Chandigarh

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर, 2005

"Whether the action ofthe managentent ofStateBank of India, Chandigarh terminating the services of Shri Sewa Ram w.c.f. 19-12-90 and retaining his juniors into employment as fresh hands on the same post is just and legal? If not , what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"

2. In claim statement it is pleaded by the workman that he was appointed at SBI G.T. Road Panipat Branch as messenger-cum-water Boy- cum-General servent w.c.f. का. आ. 4660.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक आफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , 13485 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

14-9-90 against permanent and regular vacancy and worked there up to 18-12-90 for 96 days continuously and his services were terminated on 18-12-90 without any notice or speaking order . No charge sheet was issued nor any equiry was held. The workman was paid daily wages against the rules ofBipartite settlement . It is submitted that after the termination of the workman, the management appointed large number of new employees at the same branch like Hanumant, Baljit, Ram Niwas, Vijay Kumar , Ram Kumar and Ram Mehar on daily wages on the same terms and conditions on which the workman was appointed. It is submitted that termination of the workman is in violation of the provisions of Sastri Award and Section 25G of the I.D. Act , 1947. It is further submitted that management did not consider the claim of the workman while recruiting fresh persons as messengers/peon in violation of Section 25H of the I.D. Act , 1947. Workman represented to the management to re - employ him at the time of fresh recruitment but the management did not consider his claim.

requirements of the branch . It is submitted that petitioner was never appointed by the bank , therefore , the question ofhis alleged termination does not arise and there was no need to pass any speaking order and give notice to the workman. It is submitted that petitioner was engaged as a casual labour and there is no question of violation of any settlement/law . It is further submitted that bank has been engaging the requisite casual labourer depending on its adhoc requirements from time to time and available labour was being engaged as and when required and there is no question of offering any appointment to the workman and Section 25G & H of the I.D. Act is not applicable to the workman as he is not a workman . The petitioner did not submit any application for being considered in the bank for permanent absorption in subordinate cadre . Regarding the persons appointed after his termination, it is submitted that eligible persons were considered and appointed on merits base as per bank norms and since the petitioner never apply for being considered as per the agreement, the question of any mala fide as alleged does not arise . Other contentions of the workman were also denied by the management and it is prayed that claim may be dismissed and reference may be decided in favour of the bank.

5. Rejoinder also filed by the workman reiterating the claim made in the claim statement.

6. To prove his case workman filed his affidavit Ex .W1 in evidence and also appeared as WW1. The management filed the affidavit of MW1 N.K. Griotra who provedhis affidavit Ex. M1 . He also relied on Scheme Ex.MX both these witnesses were cross - examined at length .

3. That the management has been innovating crooked andunfair methods and system as to employ large number of staff in subordinate cadre on daily wage or temporary basis depriving them even the minimumwages and to employ them as badlis , casuals or temporaries and to continue them for a long time is unfair labour practice . That the branch manager also did not issue service certificate to the workman . It is submitted that in terms of BP Settlement dated 27-10-1988 and 9-1-90 between the bank and the Union , the daily wagers would be eligible for permanent appointment in the bank provided they have completed minimum 30 days temporary service in a calendar year between 1-7-75 to 14-8-1991 and in view of the settlement the workman submitted his application to the branch manager but the workman was not called for interview for mala fide reasons , though the bank absorbed all the employees who worked during the relevant period but the case of the workman was not considered for mala fide reasons . The bank has appointed large number of persons after 18-12-90 but the management wilfully ignored the claim of the workman . The above referred persons who were employed after the termination of the service of the workman, were later on interviewed and absorbed them in the bank permanently . The management also did not consider various representations of the workman and action ofthe management not re-employing the workman is illegal , unjust and amounts to unfair labour practice and victimisation and it is prayed that workman may be reinstated in the service with retrospective effect with back wages and continuity of service.

7. Both parties filed their written arguments as well as advanced oral arguments . Learned counsel for the workman in written arguments as well in oral arguments submitted that it is undisputed that workman was eligible for appointment and for permanent absorption in the bank service .Management has admitted that workman fulfilled all the requisite qualification for being absorbed permanently. He submitted that only difficulty of the management is that workman did not apply or submit his application, therefore , he could not be considered and this is not a fault of the bank. He further urged that workman requested the branch manager for issuance of service certificate which was precondition for submitting the application as the same was to be attached with the application . The branch manager did not issue service certificate.Then workman submitted his application without the certificate tothe branch Manager SBI, G.T. Road Panipat but the workman was not called for interview for mala fide reasons which might have been rejected for want of service certificate . It is also argued that in terms of para 518 of Sastry Award it was obligatory on the part of the branch manager to issue service certificate but he wilfully violated the sad statutory provisions . He also submitted that all have been absorbed except workman . His services were 4. Inwritten statement the management has taken preliminary objection that case is highly belated and applicant is not a workman . On merits it is submitted that petitioner was engaged on different dates for a period of 76 days as casual labourer on daily basis from 14-9-90 to 18-12-90 as and when required depending upon the ad hoc [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

13486

illegally terminated in violation of the Sastry Award and Section 25G of the I.D. Act 1947. The management for malafide reasons and with a view to adjust their own persons terminated the services of the workinan and they followed unfair labour practice and violated the provisions ofSection 25H of the I.D. Act . He also submitted that as per earlier instructions only those temporary employees / daily wagers who had worked for 30 days in a calendar yearbetween 1-7-75 to 31-7-1988 were eligible for permanent absorption. These instructions were modified vide Personnel Deptt. SBI , Chandigarh LHO Note No. 4940 dated 2-8-91 according to which it has been decided that the outer date for completing the minimum required temporary service maybe extended from 31-3-1988 to 14-8-1991 . Accordingly who have completed the required minimum service during theperiod 1-7-75 to 14-8-1991 will be given a chance for being considered for permanent absorption . That the above change in the eligibility criteria was manipulated and was planned and for this reasons the management terminated the services of the workman and appointed all the new six persons referred, so that they become eligible and finally absorbed them. That thousands of daily wager were permanently absorbed in whom directly or indirectly some powerful persons were interested and even if a person could not be called in an interview but when taken up the case in the ALC, the management held a special interview. In view of the above submissions it is prayed that action of the managementto terminate the services of the workman w.e.f 10-6-90 is unjust . He prayed that workman may be reinstated in service with consequential benefits from the date ofhis termination . Workman also relied on documents i.e. Bipartite Settlement filed by both the management and theworkman.

mainly stressing that he was not given an opportunity for permanent appointment in the bank in terms of Settlement dated 27-10-1988 and 9-11-1991 between SBI Staff Federation and the bank for giving such opportunity to the ex-temporary/casual / daily wages employees who had worked in the bank for more than 30 days however subject to their prescribed eligibility and suitability on the basis of interview. In order to give this opportunity to such employees , an advertisement was given in the leading newspapers inviting applications from such eligible employees. The candidates who had applied in response to the advertisements given by the bank, were called for the interview and considered for appointment on the basis oftheir suitability in the interview. The workman did not apply for the same though he is falsaly pleading that he had given his application to the branch manager SBI G.T. Road Pahipat Branch . The workman did not produce any evidence to prove that he had given his application . He could have summoned the bank's record or the branch inanager to whom he had allegedly given his application. Moreover this issue is beyond the scope of reference made to this court thus this issue should not be taken into consideration . It is further argued that since workman has raised this Industrial Disputes almost after 10 years of his alleged termination , he could have moved to the bank and the machinery under the I. D. Act When other person called for interview. He apparently slept over his rights and that equity also does help such person and it help to the person who do equity. Their Lordship of Supreme Court in Bhoop Singh Vs. Union of India and others held that it is expected of a Govt. servant who has a legitimate claim to approach the court for the relief he seeks within a reasonable time assuming no fixed period of limitation applies . It is further submitted that the appointment in terms of settlement came to an end w.e.f. 31-3-97 and as such these settlements are not in force as on date . Copies of judgements dated 15-5-98 and 18-9-98 of Orissa High Court were referred wherein Hon'ble High Court had dismissed the writ petition of the candidates who were wait- listed and sought appointment on the basis of interview held in terms of these settlements . Even the Hon'ble Supreme Court had dismissed the special leave petitions on merits filed by them . He further submitted while summing - up his arguments that as the workman has no case as he was not absorbed due to his own fault as he did not apply with the bank and at present the policy is not in existence and the reference may be decided in favour of the management and against the workman and the workman is not entitled to any relief as the termination of the workman was just and legal . He also submitted that virtually the workman has not challanged the termination and also did not led evidence in this regard. He only challanged that his non absorption is bad and unjust and workman should have been taken and empanelled despite he did not apply for his absorption in view of the policy of the bank.

8. On the other authorised representative of the management submitted that workman has no case . The workman did not complete 240 days within a calendar year to attract the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, 1947 and it was not obligatory for the management to comply with the Section 25F . In the present case the management has not violated the provisions of Section 25F. The management also relied on 1997(3 ) RSJ 298 Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi Vs. State of Bihar and others , 2001 ( 1 ) RSJ State Bank of India Vs. Industrial Tribunal Hyd and another 680 1994 PLR page 310 Karnal Central Coop Bank Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer , AIR 1992 S.C 1414 Bhoop Singh Vs. UOI . The case of the workman in nut shell is that his services were terminated in violation of the provisions of Section 25G of the I.D. Act 1947. In reply to this the management submitted that $ ection 25G of the I.D. Act has no relevency inthis case as it deals with the procedure for retrenchment . In the absence of agreement between the employer and the workman in this behalf the employer shali ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed in that category, unless for the reasons to be recorded the employer retrenches any other workman . The workman is 13487 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

bank when he did not apply . The workman was not called for interview as he did not apply in response to the advertisement given by the bank in Newspapers when all other about thousands of employees applied and got absorption and now the scheme is over. He also submited that workman has no where challanged whether his termination is bad as per reference . His insistence is that he should have been absorbed in view of the policy, agreement entered between the bank nmanagement and 'union and advertisement were issued in the Newspapers . He also submitted that he did not apply but he has taken an excuse that he applied for issuance of certificate but the branch management did not issue him the same. So he did not apply and later the scheme was over he applied.

12. I have found as per entire record, that workman did not file any document or did not make efforts to summon the relevant record of the bank and solely relied on his oral evidence . Contention of the workman is that he applied for the certificate with the Branch Manager but Manager did not issue . As per management this is concocted story that he applied with the branch manager for issuance of service certificate .

9. In view of the above submission and my perusal of oral evidence , written arguments and oral submission of both the parties , have found that in this case the Central Govt. sent the reference for adjudication that whether the action of the management of State Bank of India Chandigarh termination the services of Shri Sewa Ram w.e.f. 19-12-90 and retaining his juniors into employment as fresh hands on the same post is just and legal . Whereas the man contentions andplea of the workman is that as per affidavit Ex.W1 and claim statement that he was eligible to be empanelled in terms of Bipartite Settlement and to be absorbed permanently but the management neither interviewed nor empanelled him whereas the management appointed many persons as daily wager after illegal termination of the workman and later on absorbing them permanently in terms of agreement . Thus the case is that after the services of thousands of workmen came to an end, an agreement was made between the management of State Bank of India and the Union of the Bank employees i.e. Union of workman and as circulated by them that daily wager employees or terminated employees would be eligible for permanent absorption in bank's service who have completed 30 days in any calendar year during the period 1-7-75 to 14-8-1991.

13. In view of my above discussion, 1 did not find any evidence on this point except the oral evidence of affidavit of the workman that he applied for the issuance of service certificate with the branch manager. Burden to prove is on the workman and workman has to discharge his burden . His oral affidavit is not sufficient to prove that he applied with the bank and bank did not issue the certificate . He also did not made efforts to summon bank record Controversy is very short now . The termination of workman is not challanged by the workman in his pleadings . In this manner he simply challenged non absorption of the workman in view of their anounced policy in the newspapers is bad .

14. Therefore , I am of the considered view that workman also failed to prove that non calling him in interview and non absorption in view of the scheme ofthe bank, is not legal and not justified because workınan did not apply to the bank for absorption . Workman did not file any oral or documentary evidence in this regard .

10. The case of the management is that the management was not obliged to follow the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act as it is no body's case that workman completed 240 days continuous service in terms as defined under the I.D. Act . The workman in this case is saying that his services were terminated in violation of provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act . He did not complete 240 days in a calendar year to attract the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act in a year. The workman has taken a plea that he was not given any opportunity for permanent employment in the bank in terms of settleinent dated 27-10-1988 and 9-1-1991 arrived at between the bank management and the workman Union for giving such opportunity to ex- workman who have worked in the bank for more than 30 days however subject to give this opportunity to their suitability on the basis of interview . In order to give this opportunity to such employees , an advertisements were given in the leading newspapers inviting applications from such eligible employees , the candidates who have applied in response to the above advertisements were called for interview and considered for appointment on the basis of their suitability in the bank.

15. I am , therefore , of the considered view that non- absorption , termination of the workman, non - calling for the workman for interview and non - empanelling him by the management is not illegal and unjust on the ground solely that workman did not apply at all . It is proved by the inanagement . Therefore, the workman is not to be reinstated and the management has not violated the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act 1947. As regards refernce , workman did not try to prove it . Rather management proved the refernce in their favour, 1 hold that even the termination ofthe workman as alleged and in reference to this Court for adjudication that action of the bank is just and legal is not challanged specifically by the workman in this case . As I 11. The persent workman did not apply for the same though he is falsly pleading that he had given his application to the branch manager SBI G.T. Road Panipat Branch. the workman did not produce any evidence that he had given any application . He could have summoned the bank record. The onus was on the workman . It is fabricated story of the workman that no experince/ service certificate was issued as he did not apply at all, In the circumstances it is the fault of the workman and not of the 13488

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927

have already held that the act of the management in not empanelling, not calling for interview and his non- absorption is also just and legal as the workman did not apply at all . Therefore , in view of the above, I hold that action ofthe management of State Bank of India Chandigarh terminating the services of Shri Sewa Ram w.e.f. 19-12-90 and retaining his juniors into employment as fresh hands on the same post is just and legal and the workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered accrodingly . Central Govt .be informed. File be consigned to record .

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigarh

नई दिल्ली, 18 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4661.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निबीजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11 ( C)/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/57/2005- आईआर ( बी-11 ) ]

सी. गंगाधरण, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th November , 2005 S.O. 4661.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award [ Ref. No. 11 (C)/2005 ] of the Industrial Tribunal , PATNA(BIHAR ) as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Canara Bank and their workman, received by the Central Government on 17-11-2005 .

{ No. L - 12012/57/2005 - IR ( B - II ) ]

C. GANGADHARAN. Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , PATNA

Refcarence No.11 ( C) of 2005 .

Management of Canara Bank . Circle Office , Lav Kush Towers . Exhibition Road , Patna and their workman Sri Gopal Singh . At & P.O. Balwakuwari Sadar Thana Hajipur . Patna , Bibar.

Sri Surinder Mohat, For the management :

Deputy General

Manager.

Sri Gopal Singh . Self

Om Prakash Sinha , For the Workinan Present !

Presiding Officer, Industrial

Tribunal , Patna .

AWARD

Patna , dated the 11th November , 2005 .

By adjudication order No. L- 12012 /57/ 2005 - IR(B - II) dated 09-08-2005 the Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi has referred , under Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( hereinafter to be referred to as the Act' ) , the following dispute between the management of Canara Bank, Cirele Office , Luv Kush Tower , Exhibition Road , Patna(Bihar ) and their workrnan Shir Gopal Singh for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in dismissing the services of Sh . Gopal Singh w.e.f. 30-09-2004 is legal and justified ? If not , what relief the concerned workman is entitled to " ?.

2. In this reference workman Shri Gopal Singh appeard before this Tribunal on 2-11-2005 and filed a petition with a prayer to withdraw his case , which is pending before this Tribunal , due to the fact that he has been re- instated in the services of the Bank .

3. After hearing these petitions on behalf of both sides we feel that no dispute between the management and the workman exists now . Needless to say , this Tribunal has but to deliver, in the circumstances aforesaid, a no dispute Award.

4. It is accordingly ordered that no dispute between the parties in relation to the Refernce exists.

5. In this respect . I hereby pass a "No Dispute Award".

6. Award accordingly .

OM PRAKASH SINHA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर , 2005

का. आ. 4662.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्थ वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, अजमेर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/03 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-41012/95/2003- आई आर ( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st November , 2005 S.O. 4662. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award 9/03 of the Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Ajmer now as shown in 13489 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3) 2005 ( 2 ) आल इण्डिया सर्विस ला जनरल 286

(4) 2004( 1 ) एस एलआर 694

(5) 1999( 1 ) सुप्रीम कोर्ट केसेज 185

the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of North Western Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 18-11-2005.

(6) 2002(3) एस एल आर 148

[No. L-41012/95/2003 - IR (B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

(7) 2002(2) एस एल आर 741

अनुबंध

प्रार्थी ने अपनी ओर से निम्न दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत कियेः-

(1) 2004 ए आई आर सुप्रीम कोर्ट 977

न्यायालय श्रम न्यायालय एवं औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण, अजमेर

(2) उक्त दृष्टांतो का सम्मान अध्ययन किया। सीआईटीआर नं . 9/03

(रेफरेंस नम्बर एल -41010/ 95 /2003/आई आर ( बी.1 ) दिनांक 9-9-03)

श्री राजेश कुलश्रेष्ठ निवासी 579/10, काली मंदिर के पास, गोविंद नगर , अजमेर

प्रार्थी का तर्क है कि अनुपस्थिति के एक लघु उपचार और प्राइवेट डाक्टर के रूग्णता प्रमाणपत्र के रेल नियमों के अनुसार नहींहोने के लघु आधार पर उसे सेवा समाप्ति का बहुत बडा दण्ड दिया है । जिससे उसका परिवार घोर आर्थिक संकट में फंस गया है । अतः सहानुभूति पूर्वक उदार दृष्टिकोण अपनाते हुए लघु दण्ड देने की प्रार्थना की है ।

प्रार्थी

बनाम

मुख्य कारखाना प्रबंधक ( लोको ) यांत्रिक कारखाना, उत्तर पश्चिम रेलवे अजमेर

अप्रार्थी

समयः श्री गंगासिंह शेखावत आर. एच. जे. एस.

स्वयं प्रार्थी

प्रार्थी कीओर से

अप्रार्थी की ओर से

श्रीराजकुमार प्रभारी अधिकारी विपक्षी

अवार्ड

दिनांक 22-10-05

केन्द्र सरकार से यह रेफरेंस निम्न प्रकार से प्राप्त हुआ है: -

Whether the action of the managementement of North Western Railway Ajmer in imposing the penalty to Sh. Rajesh Kulshrestha Khallasi from the service w.e.f. 29-6- 1983 is justified? If not what relief the workman is entitled to."?

इसके विपरीत प्रतिपक्षी के प्रतिनिधि का तर्क है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति4-12-1980 को चतुर्थ श्रेणी कर्मचारी के पद पर हुई थी । जिसमें दिसम्बर 1980 में साढ़े सात दिन का अवकाश लिया । सन् 1981 में 28 दिन सवेतन अवकाश तथा 129.5 दिन बिना वेतन के अनुपस्थित रहा । सन् 1982 में 16 दिन सवेतनिक अवकाश एवं 21 दिन अर्द्धवेतन अवकाश पर रहा । तथा 139.5 दिन बिना वेतन के कार्य से अनुपस्थित रहा । सन् 1983 में समस्त सवेतनिक और अर्द्धवेतन अवकाश का उपभोग किया तथा 70 दिन बिना वेतन के कार्य से अनुपस्थित रहा । इस प्रकार उनका तर्क है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति दिनांक 4-12-80 से 31-12-82 तक 2 वर्ष 27 दिन की सेवा अवधि में 2762 दिन बिना वेतन अनाधिकृत रूप से कार्य से अनुपस्थित रहा । तथा 44 दिन सवेतनिक अवकाश तथा 21 दिन अर्द्धवेतन अवकाश पर रहा । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी उक्त लघु अवधि में 341½ दिन कार्य पर नहीं आया । इसी प्रकार सन् 1983में भी 1-1-83 से सेवामुक्ति की दिनांक 29-1-1983 तक की अवधिमें 70 दिन बिना वेतन के अनुपस्थित रहा एवं समस्त देय सवेतनिक और अर्द्धवेतनिक अवकाश का उपभोग किया । इस प्रकार उनका तर्क है किप्रार्थी ने अपनी ढाई वर्ष की लघु सेवा अवधि में 400 दिन से अधिक कार्यसे अनुपस्थित रहकर गंभीर दुराचरण किया है । जिसके लिये समुचित दण्डदिया गया है ।

नोटिसके उपरांत प्रार्थी उपस्थित हुआ और अपनी ओर से स्टेटमेंट आफ क्लेम प्रस्तुत किया ।

प्रतिपक्षी की ओर से उत्तर प्रस्तुत हुआ । तदुपरांत आदेश दिनांक 1-10-05 द्वारा प्रारम्भिक बिन्दु इस प्रकार से निर्णीत किया कि विभागीय जांच प्राकृतिक न्याय के सिद्धांतों के अनुरूप है । अतः इस आदेश द्वारा केवल यह निर्णीत किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति का दिया गया दण्ड उसके कृत्य के अनुपात में उचित एवं पर्याप्त है अथवा नहीं और क्या यह दण्ड अधिक तो नहीं है ?

उभय पक्ष का श्रवण किया । पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया प्रतिपक्षी के प्रतिनिधि ने निम्नांकित दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत कियेः-

1996(7) सुप्रीम कोर्ट 635 (1)

मैंने उभय पक्षों के तर्कों पर विचार कर लिया है । विभागीय जांच मेंप्रार्थी द्वारा दिनांक 30-10-82 से 13-1-83 तक बिना पूर्व सूचना के अनाधिकृत रूप से अनुपस्थित रहना और प्राईवेट डाक्टर का रूग्णता प्रमाणपत्र रेल नियमों के अनुसार नहीं होने के आरोप को सिद्ध मानते हुए अनुशासनिक अधिकारी ने आदेश दिनांक 29-6-83 द्वारा प्रार्थी को च.श्रे. कर्मचारी खलासी के पद से सेवामुक्त किया गया है । यह सत्य है कि श्रम न्यायालय नियोजक के आदेश के विरूद्ध अपीलीय न्यायालय के रूप में निर्णय पारित नहीं कर सकती। किन्तु न्यायालय की अंर्तआत्मा को झकझोर देने वाला और सामान्य व्यक्ति के विवेक से परे नियोजक का दण्डादेश होने पर श्रम न्यायालय दण्डादेश में हस्तक्षेप कर सकता है । प्रतिपक्षी द्वारा प्रस्तुत दृष्टांतो के अतिरिक्त 2003 लेब आई सी 1202 चेयरमेन एण्ड मेनेजिंग डायरेक्टर बनाम पी सी कक्कड का माननीय (2) 2000(2 ) सुप्रीम कोर्ट 316 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10 , 2005/ AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13490

अनुबंध

न्यायालय श्रम एवं औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण , अजमेर ( राज. )

पीठासीन अधिकारी : श्री जी.एस. शेखावत, आरएचजेएस

प्रकरण संख्या- सी.आई.टी.आर. 13/2001

[रेफरेंस नम्बर एल -41012/ 17/2001/आई आर ( बी.1 )

दिनांक 7-6-2001 ]

दी सैकेक्ट्री, ऑल इंडिया एस.सी. एंड एस.टी. रेलवे एम्प. एसोसिएशन

अजमेर रेलवे क्वार्टर नं . 2018 बी, पावर हाऊस के सामने, हजारी बाग ,

..प्रार्थी

बनाम

उच्चतम न्यायालय का दृष्टांत इस बिन्दु पर सर्वाधिक महत्वपूर्ण है । जिसमें वेडनेसबरी के, सीसीएसयूके, 1905 ( 6 ) एससीसीएस 749, 87 ( 4 ) एस.सी. ( 6 ) । रणजीत ठाकुर के केस एवं 87 ए सी 514 के दृष्टांतो का विशेष वार्णन किया गया है । उक्त दृष्टांतो पर विचार करने के पश्चात्मैं इस निष्कर्ष पर पहुंचता हूं कि प्रार्थी की लम्बे समय तक अनाधिकृत अनुपस्थिति, रुग्णता प्रमाणपत्र के सम्बन्ध में रेल नियमों की पालना नहीं करना, अनाधिकृत अनुपस्थिति की पूर्व सूचना नहीं देना, और लघुसेवा अवधि में अनेक बार लम्बी अवधि तक अवैतनिक और सवैतनिक अवकाश पर रहने के पुराने अभिलेख को मध्य नजर रखते हुए मेरे विनम्र मत में अनुशासनिक प्राधिकारी के सेवा समाप्ति के आदेश में ऐसी कोई त्रुटि, अवैधता, अनियमितता, या न्यायालय की अंतर्भात्मा को झकझोर वाले तथ्य नहीं है जिसका वर्णन वेडनसबरी, सीसीएसयूया रणजीत ठाकुर या अन्य केस में दिया गया है । मेरे विनम्र मत में प्रार्थी अपचारी के विरुद्ध सेवा समाप्ति का दण्ड उचित एवं विधि सम्मत है और इसे अत्यधिक नहीं माना जा सकता है ।

दीचीफ वर्क्स मैनेजर ( लोको ) वेस्टर्न रेलवे, अजमेर आदेश

अप्रार्थी

उपस्थित: श्री पी. डी. खन्ना, विद्वान अधिवक्ता, प्रार्थी ।

सुश्री गुरमीत कौर, विद्वान अधिवक्ता, अप्रार्थी । फलतः प्रस्तुत विवाद का उत्तर इस प्रकार से दिया जाता है कि उत्तर पश्चिम रेलवे अजमेर के प्रबंधन द्वारा प्रार्थी राजेश कुलश्रेष्ठ खलासी कीदिनांक 29-6-1983 से सेवा से हटाने का दण्ड न्यायोचित है । प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

दिनांक 24-10-05 अवार्ड की प्रति केन्द्र सरकार को नियमानुसार प्रेषित की जावे ।

निर्णय/अवार्ड

अवार्ड आज दिनांक 22-10-05 को खुले न्यायालय में लिखवाया

केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेपित विवाद निम्न प्रकार है : - जाकर सुनाया गया।

जी. एस . शेखावत, न्यायाधीश

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005

"Whether the action of Chief Works Manager (Loco) Western Railway, Ajmer is not giving employment to Smt. Rajubai D/o Late Sh. Jwala Prasad , Ex. Painter on compassionate ground is justified? Ifnot what relief she is entitled? " का. आ. 4663.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अजमेर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41012/17 /2001- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 21st November, 2005

S.O. 4663. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13 / 2001 ) of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Ajmer now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-11-2005 .

[No. L-41012/ 17/2001 - IR (B - 1 ) ]

नोटिस के उपरांत उभयपक्ष उपस्थित आये । प्रार्थिया ने क्लेम के विवरण में अंकित किया है कि प्रार्थिया का पिता ज्वालाप्रसाद का रेलवे अस्पताल में दि. 24-8-82 को देहांत हो गया था । श्री ज्वाला प्रसाद पश्चिम रेलवे अजमेर में कैरिज कारखाना में पेंटर के पद पर कार्यरत थे जिनका टिकट नं . 32098/26 था । ज्वालाप्रसाद की मृत्यु के समय प्रार्थिया की आयु मात्र 11 वर्ष थी । उस समय वह अनभिज्ञ थी और सोचने- समझने की बुद्धि नहीं थी । प्रार्थिया को समझाने वाला अन्य कोई व्यक्ति भी उस समय नहीं था । श्री ज्वालाप्रसाद ने अपने जीवन काल में नोमिनी के रूप में प्रार्थिया का ही नाम लिखा था क्योंकि प्रार्थिया ही एकमात्र वारिस थी । सेटलमेंट की समस्त राशि भी प्रतिपक्षी ने प्रार्थिया को ही भुगतान की है । प्रार्थिया का विवाह वर्ष 1984 में हुआ था । 18 वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त होने पर प्रार्थिया ने स्व. पिता के स्थान पर अनुकंपा के आधार पर नौकरी हेतु प्रार्थना पत्र प्रस्तुत किया । प्रार्थिया ने दि. 1-4-88, 21-4-89 , 1-12-93 , 23-10-97 , 24-4-98 , 28-9-99 , 21-11-99 , 9-5-2000 आदि दिनांकों को अप्रार्थी को पत्र लिखे किंतु फिर भी प्रतिपक्षी ने अनुकंपा के आधार पर नौकरी नहीं दी अंत में , प्रतिपक्षीगण ने अपने कार्यालय आदेश दि. 9-5-2000 द्वारा प्रार्थिया AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer 3471

13491 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

को सूचित किया कि वह मृतक ज्वालाप्रसाद की आश्रित नहीं है अतः उसे नियुक्ति नहीं दी जा सकती । श्री ज्वालाप्रसाद ने पंद्रह वर्ष तक नियमित रूप से स्थाई कर्मचारी के रूप में प्रतिपक्षी को अपनी सेवायें दी है । संयुक्त श्रम आयुक्त के समक्ष उठायां विवाद पर वार्ता असफल होंने पर यह क्लेम प्रेषित किया है । अंत में अनुकंपा के आधार पर नौकरी देने और ज्वालाप्रसाद की मृत्यु की दिनांक से प्रांर्थिया को संपूर्ण वेतन- भत्ते आदि सुविधायें दिलवाने हेतु प्रतिपक्षी के विरुद्ध अवार्ड पारित करने की प्रार्थना की है ।

प्रतिपक्षी ने अपने उत्तर में अंकित किया है कि ज्वालाप्रसाद का स्वर्गवास दि. 24-8-82 को होना स्वीकार है । प्रार्थिया द्वारा प्रतिपक्षी को दि. 28-9-99 को प्रेषित पत्र प्राप्त होना अन्य कोई प्रार्थना पत्र प्राप्त नहीं होना, सेटलमेंट की राशि प्रार्थिया को प्राप्त होना स्वीकार किया है । प्रार्थिया का विवाह 18 वर्षीय अर्थात् बालिक होने से पूर्व ही हो गया था इसलिए प्रार्थिया अपने पति पर आश्रित हो गयी । प्रार्थिया अपने पति के साथ रह रही है । प्रार्थिया अपने पति और बच्चों के साथ आज भी रह रही है । अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्ति मृतक रेल कर्मचारी की विधवा या ऐसे आश्रित को दी जाती है जिसका भरण- पोषण करने वाला कोई नहीं हो । श्रीमती राजू बाई की जन्म तिथि दि. 2-6-71 है उसके 18 वर्ष की होने से पूर्व ही अर्थात् सम् 84-85 में उसका लालचंद से विवाह कर दिया गया था ऐसी स्थिति में प्रार्थिया ने अपने पति लालचंद पर आश्रित होने के कारण अनुकंपा के आधार पर उसे नियुक्ति दिया जाना संभव नहींहै ।

प्रार्थिया ने अपने क्लेम की संपुष्टि में अपना शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुतं कर प्रतिपरीक्षण करवाया है । प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य में प्रदर्श डब . 1 से 16 प्रलेखों की प्रतियां प्रदर्शित करवाकर प्रस्तुत की है । प्रतिपक्षी की ओर से श्री भूपेंद्र रावत का शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत कर प्रतिपरीक्षण करवाया है । कोई प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं की है ।

उभयपक्ष का श्रवण किया, पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया । प्रार्थिया केविद्वान अभिभाषक ने निम्नांकित दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत कियें: -

और उसके पश्चात् प्रार्थिया द्वारा भेजे गये आवेदन पत्र 26-9-99 एवं 5-6-2000 को प्राप्त होना स्वीकृत तथ्य है । प्रतिपक्षी के विद्वान अभिभाषक का मुख्य तर्क यह है कि ज्वालाप्रसाद की मृत्यु के समय प्रार्थिया की आयु 11 वर्ष की आयु थी और वह 18 वर्ष की आयु तक अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्तिप्राप्त करने में अधिकारिणी नहीं थी किंतु 18 वर्ष की आयु होने से पूर्व ही प्रार्थिया ने विवाह कर लिया, अतः वह 18 वर्ष के पश्चात् स्व. ज्वालाप्रसाद की आश्रित नहीं रही, अतः उनका तर्क है कि प्रार्थिया अनुकंपा के आधार पर सेवा में नियुक्ति प्राप्त करने की अधिकारिणी नहींहै । इसके विपरीत प्रार्थिया के विद्वान अभिभाषक का तर्क है कि प्रतिपक्षी ने श्रीमति मीरा को विवाहित पुत्री होने के आधार पर अन्यमामले में नियुक्तिदी है किंतु प्रार्थिया के मामले में भेदभाव किया जा रहा है । 2005 लैब आई सी 564 भारती/बिहार राज्य के दृष्टांत के आधार पर उनका तर्क है कि पुत्री का विवाहित होना उसके अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्ति देने में कोई बाधा या रुकावट नहीं है । उक्त दृष्टांत कामैंने ससम्मान् अध्ययन किया । प्रार्थिया ने श्रीमति मीरा विवाहित पुत्री केअन्यमामले में नियुक्ति देने के वरिष्ठ कार्मिक अधिकारी के पत्र को प्रस्तुत किया है । रेलवे के 21-11-2001 के विधवा या तलाकशुदा पुत्री को अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्ति देने के सरक्यूलर प्रस्तुत किये गये है। जहां तक विवाहित पुत्री को अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्ति देने के प्रश्न का संबंधं है, प्रार्थिया ने 4-1-88 से प्रतिपक्षी को अनेक पत्र अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्ति हेतु प्रस्तुत किये जिनकी यू.पी.सी.की अनेक रसीदें प्रस्तुत की गयी है । यह स्वीकृत तथ्य है कि ज्वालाप्रसाद के सेटलमेंट की समस्त राशि का भुगतान प्रार्थिया को ही किया गया है । ज्वालाप्रसाद की मृत्युके समय प्रार्थिया 11 वर्षीय अशिक्षित, निरीह पुत्री ज्वालाप्रसाद की आश्रित थी । प्रार्थिया का विवाह बाद में हुआ किंतु उसके 18 वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त करने से पूर्व ही हो गया था । समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों और 2005 लैब आई सी 564 माननीय पटना उच्च न्यायालय के सुंदर दृष्टांत को मद्देनजर रखते हुए मेरे विनम्र मत में प्रार्थिया को विवाह के पश्चात् भी अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्ति देनी चाहिए । उक्त तथ्यों के कारण विलंब को घातक नहीं माना जा सकता । (1) 2005 एलआईसी ( पटना)564,

आदेश

(2) 2005 एलआईसी ( राज. )552,

प्रतिपक्षी के विद्वान अभिभाषक ने निम्नांकित दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत कियेः-

(1) 2005 ( 1 ) ( एसएलजे एस. सी. ) 281,

(2) 2003 ( 3 ) ( एसएलजे ) ( कैट) 331 ,

(3) 2003 एस. सी. सी. एल. एंड एस. 1183 ,

(4) 2005 ( 1 ) ( एआईजे ) । ( कैट ) 425,

(5) 2004( 1 ) ( एसएलजे) एस.सी. 247,

(6) 2001 ( 1 ) ( एसएलजे ) ( एस. सी. ) 418,

फलतः प्रस्तुत विवाद का उत्तर इस प्रकार से दिया जाता है कि चीफ वर्क्स मैनेजर ( लोको) पश्चिम रेलवे अजमेर द्वारा श्रीमति राजू बाई पुत्री स्व. ज्वालाप्रसाद भू.पू. पेंटर को अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्तिनहीं देना न्यायोचित नहीं है । प्रार्थिया के अनुकंपा के आधार पर नियुक्तिप्राप्त करने की अधिकारिणी है । अतः प्रतिपक्षीगण को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि प्रार्थिया को उसके स्वर्गीय पिता की मृत्यु पर अनुकंपा के आधार पर योग्यतानुसार एवं नियमानुसार तीन माह में नियुक्तिप्रदान करे ।

उक्त दृष्टांतो का ससम्मान अध्ययन किया ।

प्रस्तुत प्रकरण में लगभग समस्त तथ्य स्वीकृत तथ्य हैं ।

निर्णय/अवार्ड आज दि. 24-10-05 को खुले न्यायालय में सुनाया गया । अवार्ड की प्रति नियमानुसार केंद्र सरकार को वास्ते गजट में प्रकाशन प्रेषित की जावे ।

जी. एस. शेखावत, न्यायाधीश, प्रार्थिया की स्व. ज्वालाप्रसाद, भू. पू. रेलकर्मी की एकमात्र आश्रित संतान मृत्यु के समय होना , अन्य कोई वारिस नहीं होना, ज्वालाप्रसाद कीदि. 24-8-82 को मृत्यु होना और मृत्यु के समय प्रार्थिया की आयु 11 वर्ष होना और उसके पश्चात् 18 वर्ष की आयु से पूर्व ही प्रार्थिया का विवाह लालचंद से होना और 18 वर्ष की आयु दि. 2-6-89 को होना

3423 G1 /05-24 13492

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

New Delhi , the 21st November , 2005 नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005

S.O. 4665. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CI.T.R. 04/99) of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ajmer now ' as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of I.B.P. Company Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 17-11-2005.

का. आ. 4664. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कनक दुर्गा ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यावालय हैदराबाद के शुद्धिपत्र ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी-57/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 /78/2002- आई आर ( बी -1 ) ]

[No. L-30012/ 142/97 - IR (C- I ) ] S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy .

अजय कुमार, डैस्क अधिकारी

अनुबंध

New Delhi , the 21st November , 2005

न्यायालय श्रम एंव औधोगिक न्यायाधिकरण, अजमेर ( राज. )

पीठासीन अधिकारीः श्री जी. एस. शेखावत, आरएचजेएस

प्रकरण संख्या-सी.आई.टी.आर. 04/99

(रेफरेंस नं. एल-30012/142/97-आई. आर. सी- 1 दि. 30-11-1998)

श्री कुलदीप किशोर गुप्ता पुत्र श्री के. आर. गुप्ता,

S.O. 4664.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the corrigendum ( ID. No 57/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofKanaka Durga Grameena Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 18-11-2005.

ए-92युआईटी कॉलोनी,

....प्राथी

नाकामदार, अजमेर

[No. L- 12011/78/ 2002 - IR (B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

बनाम

ANNEXURE

दीसीनियर मैनेजर,

आई.बी.पी. कंपनी लिमिटेड

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT

HAYDERABAD

ए गवर्नमेंट ऑफ इंडिया,

Dated the 1-11-2005

No. ID . 57/2003

बिजनेस ग्रुप केमिकल्स,

CORRIGENDUM

रामपुरा , आगुचा

.... अप्राथी

जिला-भीलवाड़ा

....प्रार्थी

उपस्थित: श्री पी.डी खन्ना, विद्वान अधिवक्ता,

श्री जी.एल. अग्रवाल ,

.... अप्रार्थी

विद्वान अधिवक्ता,

Corrigendum to the Award passed in I.D. No 57 / 2003 dated 2-5-2005 published in the Offcial Gazette to be published in Part II Section 3 , Sub -Section III of the Gazette of India not later than 20-8-2005 vide Notification No.L - 12011 /78/2002- IR (B.I) dated 26-7-2005 . In the cause title, the Respondent address shall be read- as GUDIVADA instead of GUNTUR.

दिनांक 22-10-2005

अवार्ड

Sd/-ILLAGIBLE , PresidingOfficer

केंद्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित विवाद निम्न प्रकार है:-

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005

" क्याआई.बी.पी. कंपनी लि० रामपुरा द्वारा श्री कुलदीप किशोर गुप्ता, प्रशा ० सहायक, को दि. 1-4-96 से सेवा से हटाया जाना विधिवत् तथा न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं तो वे किस राहत के पात्र है ? "

का. आ. 4665.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आई.बी.पी. कंपनी लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अजमेर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या C.I.T.R 04/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -30012/142/97- आई आर ( सी-- [ ) ]

नोटिस के उपरांत उभयपक्ष उपस्थित आये प्रार्थी ने अपने क्लेम केविवरण में अंकित किया है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति प्रतिपक्षी के अधीन स्टेनो-टाईपिस्टके पद पर अस्थाई रूप से दि. 18-10-93 के कार्यालय आदेश के अंर्तगत हुई थी। प्रार्थी को दि. 30-4-94 , 15-6-94 1-8-94, 14-9-94 , 1-11-94 एवं जुन 95 में अस्थाई रूप से नियुक्ति पत्र दिये थे । प्रार्थी ने 18-10-93 से 1-5-96 तक निरंतर ईमानदारी एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

लगन और मेहनत से कार्य किया जिसमें प्रार्थी को नियमित वेतनमान दिया गया । प्रतिपक्षी ने दिसंबर 95 में प्रार्थी को आदेश दिया कि उसका कंर्फमेशन लैटर अतिशीघ्र कंपनी के मुख्यालय नोएडा से आयेगा तब तक नियमित रूप से कार्य करे । प्रार्थी ने अपनी उपस्थिति विभाग में दर्ज की । दि. 1-5-96 को प्रतिपक्षी ने प्राथी को मौखिक आदेश देकर नौकरी से निकाल दिया । सेवा समाप्ति से पूर्व न कोई नोटिस दिया न ही वेतन और मुआवजा दिया । प्रतिपक्षी ने 25-10-94 को मुख्यालय नोएडा में पत्र भेजकर प्रार्थी के पद को अस्थाई करने की अनुमति मांगी थी । दि. 27-1-94 के पत्र द्वारा मुख्यालय नोएडा ने कोई उपयुक्त व्यक्ति होने पर उसका नाम भेजने हेतु प्रतिपक्षी को लिखा था किंतु फिर भी प्रार्थी का नाम नहीं भेजा। मुख्यालय नोएडा ने दि 2-3-94 के पत्र द्वारा स्टेनो- टाईपिस्ट का पद स्थाई कर दिया किन्तु फिर भी प्रतिपक्षी ने कोई ध्यान नहीं दिया । प्रतिपक्षी ने निरंतर यही कहा कि स्टेनो- टाईपिस्ट का पद अस्थाई रहेगा एवं वेतनमान 1500 फिक्स रहेगा । प्रार्थी को 1-4-95 से 30-4-95 तक का 1800/- रू० वेतन भी नहीं दिया । सेधा समाप्ति का उक्त आदेश अवैध, त्रुटिपूर्ण एवं अनोचित्यपूर्ण है, वरिष्ठता सूची भी जारी नहीं की औधोगिक विवाद अधि० के प्रावधानों का स्पष्ट उल्लंघन किया है । प्रार्थी ने दि. 18-10-93 से 1-5-96 तक एक वर्ष में 240 दिन सेअधिक तक सेवा नियमित रूप से पूरी की है, अतः प्रार्थी स्थाई होने का अधिकारी हो चुका है । प्रार्थी द्वारा सहायक श्रम आयुक्त के समक्ष विवाद उठाने पर वार्ता विपल होने पर यह विवाद प्रेषित किया गया है । अंत में उक्त मौखिक सेवा समाप्ति के आदेश को अपास्त कर पूर्ण वेतन - भत्तों सहित एवं ब्याज सहित पुर्नस्थापित करने , अप्रैल 95 का बकाया, वेतन मय ब्याज दिलाने का अनुतोष चाहा है ।

13493

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

प्रदर्शित करवाकर प्रस्तुत किये । प्रतिपक्षी की ओर से आर. पी. गोयल, वरिष्ठ प्रबंधक का शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत कर प्रतिपरीक्षण करवाया और प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य में प्रदर्श एम -1 से 19 प्रलेखों की प्रतियां प्रदर्शित करवाकर प्रस्तुतकी ।

उभयपक्ष का श्रवण किया, पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया । प्रार्थी के विद्वान अभिभाषक ने निम्न दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत कियेः-

1. 1993 ( 2 ) आरंएलआर 670,

2. 1998 ( 1 ) डब्ल्यू एल एन 548 ,

3. 2003 एलआईसी ( गुजरात) 583 ,

4. 1997 एआईआर एस. सी. 2446 ,

5. 2005 ( 3 ) आरएलडब्ल्यू1926 ,

6. 2005 ( 1 ) एस.सी. एसएलआर 525 ,

7. 2003 (3 ) आरएलआर 548 ,

8. 2001 ( 1 ) डब्ल्यू एल एन 385 ,

9. 2004 एलआईसी ( बांबे ) 2505 ,

10. 2004 एस.सी.एस.एल.आर. 855,

11. 2000 ( 3) आरएलआर 447 .

उक्त दृष्टांतों का ससम्मान् अध्ययन किया । अब मेरे समक्ष निम्नबिंदु निर्णयार्थ प्रस्तुत है:-

(1 ) क्या प्रार्थी ने प्रतिपक्षी के अधीन सेवा- समाप्ति की दि. 1-4- 96 से पूर्व गत वर्ष में 240 दिन तक निरंतर श्रमिक के रूप में कार्यकिया ?

(2) क्याप्रतिपक्षी कंपनी गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता को 1-5-95 से 31- 3-96 तक ऑफिस कार्य एवं प्लांट के विविध कार्य करने हेतु 2000/-रु. का अनुबंध किया जिसमें 2000/- रु. मासिक दर से भुगतान करने का अनुबंध किया ?

(3) क्याप्रतिपक्षी ने औद्योगिक विवाद अधि. के प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन किया है ?

(4) अनुतोष ?

बिंदु सं. 1 व 2

प्रतिपक्षी ने क्लेम के उत्तर में अंकित किया है कि प्रार्थी श्रमिक की हेसियत से स्टेनो- टाईपिस्ट नहीं था, न ही प्रतिपक्षी उसका नियोक्ता था। प्रतिपक्षी ने अपने कार्यालय में प्लांट के विविध कार्य करने हेतु सेवायें हायर करने के लिए कोटेशन मागें थे जिस पर प्रतिपक्षी कंपनी को तीन कोटेशन प्राप्त हुए जिसमें एक कोटेशन गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी कुर्दा का प्राप्त हुआ था । जिसकी सर्विस रेट 2000/-रु. प्रतिमाह थी अतः प्रतिपक्षी कंपनी ने 1-5-95 से 31-3-96 तक ऑफिस कार्य एवं प्लांट के विविध कार्य करने हेतु रु. 2000/- प्रतिमाह की दर से ग्यारह माह के लिए उक्त सेवाओं को देने हेतु सर्विस कांट्रैक्ट दिया था तथा गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी ने अपनी ओर से प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी कंपनी में सेवा देने हेतु अधिकृत किया था । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी के प्रतिनिधि/कर्मचारी की हेसियत से प्रतिपक्षी कंपनी को काट्रैक्ट बेसिस पर सर्विस दी थी जिसका बिल भी गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी द्वारा ही किया जाता था और भुगतान भी गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी के नाम से किया जाता था। इस प्रकार प्रार्थी एवं प्रतिपक्षी के मध्य श्रमिक एवं नियोक्ता के संबंध कभी नहीं रहे । प्रार्थी को कभी भी 44 दिन से अधिक की सेवा हायर करने बाबत् कोई पत्र नहीं है । दि. 30-11-95 से 30-12-95 तक गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी द्वारा प्रतिपक्षी को कोई सेवायें नहीं दी गयी । दि. 31-3-96 को संविदा समाप्त होने के साथ ही सर्विस भी स्वतः ही समाप्त हो गयी । अंत में क्लेम निरस्त करने की प्रार्थना की है । प्रार्थी ने अपने क्लेम की संपुष्टि में स्वयं का शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत कर प्रतिपरीक्षण करवाया और प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य में प्रदर्श डब. 1 से 32 प्रलेख उभयपक्ष ने अपने-अपने क्लेम और उत्तर की संपुष्टि में एक- एक साक्षी के शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत कर प्रतिपरीक्षण करवाया है जिसमें उनके अभिवचनों में अंकित कथनों की ही पुनरावृत्ति की है । प्रार्थी ने प्रतिपरीक्षण में यह स्वीकार किया है कि प्रदर्श डब. 11 दि. 3-12-93 का उसके द्वारा दिया गया टाईपिंग वर्क एवं सर्विस चार्जेज का बिल है, नियुक्ति पत्र नहीं है । उसे अस्थाई आधार पर नियुक्त किया गया था । प्रदर्श डब. 13 भी टाईपिंग का बिल है । इस साक्षी ने प्रदर्श एम -1 से 12 तक पर ए से बी अपने हस्ताक्षर होना स्वीकार किया है । प्रदर्श एम -13 उसके हाथ की लिखावट होना भी स्वीकार किया है । प्रदर्श एम -1 से 12 प्रार्थी द्वारा प्रतिपक्षी को दिया जाना भी उसने स्वीकार किया है । प्रदर्श एम-3 से 12 तक भुगतान भी उसने प्राप्त होना स्वीकार किया है । अंत में प्रतिपरीक्षण में कथन किया है कि प्रदर्श एम-3 से 12 के बिल उसने कांट्रैक्ट बेसिस के दिये हो तो उसे पता नहीं । इस प्रकार प्रदर्श एम -3 से 12के बिल कांट्रैक्ट बेसिस पर दिये जाने से इस साक्षी ने स्पष्ट रूप में इंकार नहीं किया बल्कियह कथन किया कि ये बिल कांट्रैक्ट बेसिस के होतो उसे पता नहीं है । [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13494

प्रतिपक्षी के साक्षी ने प्रार्थी को नियुक्ति पत्र 44-44 दिन के अस्थाई आधार पर ब्रब्रेक सहित दिया जाना स्वीकार किया है । प्रदर्श डब. 2 से प्रदर्श डब . 6 प्रतिपक्षी द्वारा प्रार्थी को दिया जाना भी साक्षी ने स्वीकार किया है ।

इस प्रकार उक्त साक्ष्य के अध्ययन से स्पष्ट है कि उभयपक्ष द्वारा प्रस्तुत अधिकांश प्रलेखों को स्वीकार किया है । प्रदर्श डब. 2 के अनुसार प्रार्थी की 30-4-94 की नियुक्ति एडमिनिस्ट्रेटिव असिस्टेंट ( टाईपिस्ट) के पद पर 44 दिन हेतु 1-4-94 से निश्चित वेतन 1550/-रु . पर उक्त पत्र पर अंकित शर्तों पर की गयी थी और उसके पश्चात् प्रदर्श डब. 3 से 6 तक के प्रलेखों के अनुसार 44-44 दिन के लिए नियुक्ति की जाती रही और बीच में एक या दो दिन का ब्रेक दिया जाता रहा । प्रदर्श डब. 6 1-11-94 से 14-11-94 तक 44 दिन हेतु है । उसके पश्चात् का कोई नियुक्ति पत्र नहीं है । प्रदर्श डब. 11 टाईपिंग वर्क और सर्विस चार्जेज का 452/-रु . का बिल है और इसी प्रकार प्रदर्श डब. 12 सर्विस चार्जेज 500 / -रु . का बिल है जो के. के. गुप्ता के कार्य हेतु दिया गया है । इसी प्रकार प्रदर्श डब. 13 भी टाईपिंग के कार्य का बिल है जो दि. 1-11-93 से 30-11-93 का है ।

जहां तक प्रतिपक्षी के प्रलेखों का संबंध है, प्रतिपक्षी के प्रलेख प्रदर्श एम-1 से 13 को प्रार्थी द्वारा प्रतिपरीक्षण में स्वीकार किया है । प्रदर्श एम -1 से 12 पर ए से बी हस्ताक्षर प्रार्थी के है । उक्त सभी प्रलेख गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी के लैटर हैड पर जारी किये गये है । प्रदर्श एम- 1 के अनुसार ऑफिस के विविध कार्य हेतु गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी की ओर से एक व्यक्ति 2000 रु. मासिक आधार पर 1-5-95 से 31-3-96 तक कार्य करने हेतु उपलब्ध करवाने हेतु कोटेशन दिया गया है जो जिस पर प्रार्थी के. के. गुप्ता ने हस्ताक्षर कर पत्र प्रेषित किया है । प्रदर्श एम-13 ए और एम -14 अन्य कंपनियों के कोटेशन है । प्रदर्श एम15 में तीनों कोटेशन का उल्लेख करते हुए गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी कान्यूनतम कोटेशन होने पर उसका प्रस्ताव स्वीकार किया गया है । प्रदर्श एम -2 के अनुसार गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी की ओर से एक व्यक्ति श्रीकुलदीप किशोर गुप्ता को कार्य करने हेतु उपलब्ध करवाने हेतु प्रार्थी के. के. गुप्ता के हस्ताक्षरित पत्र है । शेष प्रदर्श एम -3 से 12 गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी के बिल है जो सर्विस चार्जेज 2000/-रु. एवं 1867/-रु. के हैजिनमें से क्रमशः 40/- और 37/-रु. दो प्रतिशत की दर से टी.डी.एस. काटकर भुगतान किये जाने के आदेश दिये गये है । प्रतिपक्षी कंपनी ने लाइसेंस प्रदर्श एम -16 नियुक्ति हेतु लाइसेंस ले रखा है । उक्त प्रलेखों से यह स्पष्ट है कि प्रतिपक्षी कंपनी ने गुप्तां एंड गुप्ता को प्रशासनिक एवं विविध कार्य करने हेतु एक व्यक्ति उपलब्ध करवाने हेतु दि. 1-5-95 से 31-3-96 तक का कांट्रैक्ट दे रखा था । गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी की ओर से के.के. गुप्ता ने हस्ताक्षर किये और के. के. गुप्ता ने ही यह कार्य किया जिसके संबंध में गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी की ओर से के. के. गुप्ता ने पत्र लिखा । अन्य बिल सर्विस चार्जेज के रूप में गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी की ओर से के. के. गुप्ता ने प्रस्तुत कर भुगतान प्राप्त किया । प्रतिपक्षी कंपनी ने दो प्रतिशत की दर से टी. डी. एस. काटते हुए बिल भुगतान किया है भुगतान प्राप्त करना प्रार्थी ने स्वीकार किया है । इससे स्पष्ट है कि 1-5-95 से 31-3-96 की अवधि में प्रतिपक्षी ने गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी की ओर से किये गये अनुबंध के आधार पर प्रार्थी से कार्य करवाया है । प्रार्थी ने गत वर्ष में निरंतर 240 दिन तक कार्य करना सिद्ध नहीं किया है, अतः प्रस्तुत विवाधक प्रार्थी के विरूद्ध एवं प्रतिपक्षी के पक्ष में निर्णीत किये जाते है ।

बिंदु सं. 3 व 4

प्रार्थी ने प्रतिपक्षी के अधीन गत वर्ष में 240 दिन से अधिक निरंतर कार्य करना सिद्ध नहीं किया है , इसके विपरीत प्रतिपक्षी ने 1-5-95 से 31-3-96 तक अनुबंध के आधार पर गुप्ता एंड गुप्ता कंपनी से कार्य करवाकर भुगतान करना सिद्ध कर दिया है । अतः 31-3-96 को संविदा समाप्ति पर प्रार्थी को आगे कार्य देने का प्रतिपक्षी काकोई उत्तरदायित्व नहीं है । संविदा समाप्ति पर सेवायें स्वतः ही समाप्त हो गयी अतः प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

आदेश

फलतः प्रस्तुत विवाद का उत्तर इस प्रकार से दिया जाता है किआई.बी.पी. कंपनी लिमिटेड रामपुरा द्वारा श्री कुलदीप किशोर गुप्ता प्रशासनिक सहायक को दि. 1-4-96 से सेवा से हटाया जाना विधिवत् एवं न्यायोचित है, अतः प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

जी. एस. शेखावत , न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4666.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एअर इंडिया लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय मुम्बई- I के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 20/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-11012/59/99- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

एस.एस. गुप्ता , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st November , 2005 S.O. 4666. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref.No 20 / 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Mumbai - I now as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India Ltd.and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 17-11-2005 .

[No. L - 11012/ 59/99 - IR (C- I ) ]

S.S. GUPTA, Under Secy .

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 MUMBAI Persent JUSTICE GHANSHYAM DASS Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT - 20 OF 2000 Parties:

Employers in relation to the management ofAir India Ltd.

And

Their workman (Smt . Jyoti Ghag) 13495 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Appearances:

For the Management :

Mr. Lancy D'souza,

Advocate

Forthe workman

Workman present in

person

Maharashtra

State

Mumbai dated the 25th day of October , 2005

AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause ( d) of sub -section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (the Act for short) . The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows:

SCHEDULE

premises of the Air India as a Security Guard . The Board deployed another perosn in place of the present workman on account of absence for five months from 28-1-1996 to 22-6-1996. The work of the workman was supervised by the Board's own Supervisor and not by Air India. The workmanwas never issued any appointment letter by the Air India which had no control whatsoever either Administrative of supervisory over the workman . The workman was never an employee of Air India . The allegations by the workman in the Statement of Claim are denied in detail . It is denied that the work of the workman was supervised by Shri. R.B. Singh on behalf of Air India or that any information was ever received by Mr. R.B. Singh regarding the sickness of her son for that Mr. R..B . Singh ever refused the workman to join duty since the workman was an employee of the Board , she should have approached the Board for allotment of duties or deployment. In fact, service of certain Security guards were absorbed by the Air India in view of the decision passed by Honourable High Court of Bombay to which the present workman was not a party . Mr.P.T. Gangurde was deployed in place of the present workman and since he was a party to the aforesaid writ petition, his services were regularized.

"Whether the action of the management of Air India in not regularizing the services of Smt . Jyoti Ghag, Lady Searcher/ Security Guard is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled and from what date?

4.The following Issues were framed in this reference:

1. (a) Whether the reference is competent for the reason the workman was not the employee of the Air India Ltd ?

(b) Whether any industrial dispute exists between the parties ?

2.Whether the workman is entitled to any relief claimed by her in accordance with the statement filed by her?

2. The Statement of claim has been filed by Smt. Joyti Ghag (hereinafter referred to as " workman " ) on 4th May , 2000. It is alleged that the workman was employed by M/ s . Air India (hereinafter referred to " employer" ) through the Security Guard Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District (hereinafter referred to as the " Board " ) on a request made by the Employer to the Board . Accordingly , the workınan was posted at Air India Building of the Employer at Nariman Point , Mumbai on 22-1-1996. The workman was discharging the duties sincerely . An Identity card was issued to the workman by the Employer which was valid upto 31-12-1996 . The work of the workman was supervised by Shri R.B. Singh , Officer in charge of Security Board, during the month of June 1996, the workman remained absent for few days . She came back to join duty on or about 10-7-1996 but she was refused to join the duties . The absence was on account of sickness of her son. Shri Gangurde was posted in the place of the workman and his services were regularized by the Air India along- with so many others . The workman requested again and again but to no use . The workman was never absorbed in service . She raised the Industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) but conciliation failed . As a result the instant reference is being made .

5. The workman has led evidence by filing her affidavit. She was put to cross examination . The admission made by the workman in her cross examination are very material . She admitted that she got herselfregistered with Maharashtra Security Guard Board from 1996. She was sent to Grindlays Bank and M.T.N.L;. by the said Board. She was sent to Air India by the aforesaid Board . The Uniform which she used for duty was provide by the Board. She was drawing the salary from the aforesaid Security Grard'sBoard. She was issued appointment letter by the said Board. She was never issued any letter by Air India. She worked for six or seven months and remained absent during the month of June and July 1996. Certain Security Guards got absorbed by the Air India in view of the decision oftheHigh Court Bombay in the writ petition . She has not submitted any resignation to Security Guard's Board. She ispresently working on temporary basis with MTNL as a Checker in the Security Department.

3. The Air India has filed written statement dated 6-9-2001 . It is alleged that the instant reference is not maintainable since the relationshop of Employer and Employee did not exist in between the parties to the reference . It is alleged that the workman was never employed by Air India. In fact, the workman was an employee of Maharashtra State Security Guards Board and the said Board had deployed the workman in the

6. Air India has led the evidence in the form of affidavit sworn and affirmed by Mr. Mohammedgaus I. Bagban. This witness has admitted in cross examination 13496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19 , 1927 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

security guard to the factoru or establishment where he was employed on the commencement of the Act". that the averments in the affidavit which are based on record. He does not have any personal knowledge to the facts mentioned in the aforesaid affidavit.

7. The workman as well as the Employer has filed written arguments . The copies of the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court ofBombay in W.P.285 of 1993 filedby Kranthikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatan against Air India Ltd. , 2205 of 1996 filed by Kranthi kari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatan against Air India and 2471 of 1991 filed by Bharatiya Kamgar Union against the International Airport Authority of India along with copies of the aforesaid writ petitions are being filed on record .

11. Ina case reported in 2001 III CLR 565 Supreme Court, Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. v/s Samijuddin Ahmed , the dispute was with respect to the relationship between the workman and the employer .The Honourable Supreme court observed that the documentary evidence filed on behalf of the appellant , clearly goes to show that the respondent never entered into the employment ofthe appellant. Thus , the reference of disput under Section 10 of the I.D. Actbased on assumption that the Respondent had entered the service with appellant and was then removed from service suffered from material infirmity and was therefore vitiated.

8. The only point for determination in this case is as to whether the workman was not an employee of Air India and as to whether an industrial dispute exists in between theparties.

12. In 2004 CLR 351 the workmen of Nilgir Coop Marketing sociely Ltd. V/s . State of Tamil Nadu and Ors . the Honourable Supreme Court held that it is well settled principle of law that the person who sets up a plea of its existence, the burden of proof lies upon him since the workman asserted the relationship of workman and employer, the workman was required to prove the relationship; If this burden was not discharged the relationship of workman and employer could not be concluded.

9. In veiw of the evidence available on record it has been clearly proved that the workman was not appointed by Air India . The workman was never issued any appointment letter by Air India . She was issued appointment letter by the Security Guard Board where she was registered. She was paid salary by the said Board and her work was supervised by the said Board. She is still in the service of the said Board and persently working with the M.T.N.L. where she is being deployed by the said Board. She has not yet submitted any resignation to the Board. These are the categorical admissions made by the workman inher cross examination that leaves no room for doubt in holding that the present workman was not an employee of Air India . She was only deployed by the Security Guard Board to perform the duties at a place where she is asked to work by Air India. That being so , the relationship to workman and employer vis -a - vis the present workman and the Air India does not exist and hence the present reference is incompetent in view of the settled legal position for which I may refer certain cases below .

13. The claim of the workman for regularization of the services by Air India is not acceptable for the reasons she was never employed by Air India nor she became the workman or Air India . In fact , she was deployed with Air India on a request made by Air India from the Security Guards Board where she was registered . The workman worked for a short period about six months only with Air India . Mr. Gangurde was deployed in place of the present workman in view of her absence during the month of June 1996 till 10-7-1996 . The services of Mr. Gangurde were regularized for the reason he was a party to the writ petition before the Honourable Bombay High Court and in pursuance to the order of Bombay High Court, the Air India had regualrised the services of number of persons . The services of the present workman could not be regularized as she was not on roll of Air India as a deployed person on the cut off date and was not a party to the writ petition referred to above.

10. In 2002 LAB IC 1603 International Airport Authority Employee's Union v/ s Internationl Airport Authority of India and others , the Honourable Bombay High Court held that the registered Security guard does not become the direct employee of registered employer on being allotted by the Board to the said Employer . The Honourable High Court ofBombay has observed as under:

14. In view ofwhat has been said above , I conclude that the workman was not an employee of Air India and that being so the action of the management of Air India in not regularizing the services of the workman Smt . Jyoti Ghag is legal and justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief in this reference.

Justice GHANSHYAM DASS, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 21 नवम्बर, 2005

" It cannot also be said that the registered security guards became employees of the factory or establishment where they were working on the date of the commencement oftheAct. TheBoard has the power even at the time ofthe initial allotment , to determine the registered employer of a given security guard . This must necessarily be so as the Board would have to consider the requirments of various employers , the availability of sutiable security guards for an employer and the availability of employment with employers at every stage including at the stage of initial allotment. There is no and could not have been a inflexible requirement of allotment in every case of a

का. आ. 4667.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एअर इंडिया लि० के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

श्रम न्यायालय मुम्बई- I के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 06/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-11012/68/ 99- आई आर ( सी- I ) ]

13497

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

any one to be misguided . The discrimination can never be lawful . It would have been better and that appears to be the spirit of the reference that the action of the management in not treating the workman under the reference in question at par with other aircraft technicians is legal and justified?

एस.एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st November, 2005 S.O. 4667. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No 06/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Mumbai - I now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India Ltd. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 17-11-2005 .

[No. L - 11012/ 68/ 99 - IR ( C-I) ]

S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.1 MUMBAI PERSENT

JUSTICE GHANSHYAM DASS , Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT -06 of 2003 Parties:

Employers in relation to the management ofAir India Ltd.

And

Their wordmen .

APPEARANCES :

For the Management

Mr. Lancy D'Souza, Adv.

Forthe Union

Mr. J. P Sawant , Adv.

State :

Maharashtra

Mumbai dated the 31st day of October ' 2005

AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Govemment inexercise of its powers under clause ( d) sub -section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 ( the Act for short) vide Government of India, Minstry of Labour, New Delhi Order No. L- 11012/ 68 /99 - IR (C - 1 ) dated 04-2-2000.

The terms ofreference given in the schedule are as follows:

"Whether the action of the management of Air India Ltd. in discriminating Mr. J.Y. Gaikwad and 22 others ( as per list) in payment of performance linked incentive at par with other Aircraft Technicians is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to ?" 2. At the very outset , 1 may mention that the word ' indiscriminating ' does not appear to be proper word while making reference to this tribunal . I feel that the language of the reference should be healthy and should not lead 3. The contention of the workman in the reference in question is that they were employed by the management ofAir India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the management for short) in its Engineering Department , Major Maintenance Division in the capacity of Aircraft Technician initially and were subsequently promoted and disignated as shown in the Annexure ' A' enclosed to the Statement of Claim . It is contended that they have been attending to the work in connection with painting of aircraft externally as well as internally under the direct and strict supervision of licensed aircraft engineers ofMajor Maintenance Division . They attended to the job as per instructions and also carried out painting job on record as per technical data sheets They paint the aircraft on the interior part of aircraft right from cockpit to tail section , vertical stabilizer and horizontal stabilizer wings and all section of aircraft . The work of the workmen is directly related to aircraft technician . The representative of the management and that of Air India Employees Guild signed a memorandum of Settlement on 31-5-1996 providing for Performance Linked Incentive Schemes to the workmen which was made effective from 01-5-1996 . The settlement was subject to the approval of the National Industrial Tribunal , Mumbai but no approval was ever obtained by the management which however , implemented the terms and conditions of it . This Settlement provided for three different schemes . One in respect of Technicians of Engineering Department " directly related to Aircraft production " , second in respect of few technicians of Airport Service Department related to support to aircraft production and third in respect of non - technicians categories . The payment of benefits of schemes are in descending manner viz . 100% , 75% and 50% of Performance Linked Incentives respectively .

4. The main contention of the workmen is that they were entitled to the benefit of performance linked incentive schemes rates as applied to Technicians of Engineering Department whose services were directly related to aircraft production . However, the workmen in question were treated at arbitrarily and unreasonably and were treated as categories related to support to aircraft production . This sort of classification made in the aforesaid settlement deprived the workman concerned in the present dispute to 100% Performance Linked Incentive as per first scheme while they have been forced to accept 75 % performance linked incentives as paid to the Categories related to support of aircraft production . The workmen raised the dispute before the Conciliation Officer but the Conciliation failed . Hence the reference .

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13498

doing the job ofPainting the aircraft . None of the workmen possess any engineering degree or graduates degree or Diploma in Engineering for painting work . The Settlement dated 31-5-96 is in operation and it has been given effect to by the management by paying the Performance Linked Incentive.

8. The management has filed affidavit of Shri . B.R. Garude. In his cross examination he stated that no Notice was given to the workmen when the Settlement was entered into with the Air India Employees Guild. He is not aware if the Memorandum of Settlement is registered in the office of Regional Labour Commissioner, Mumbai . He is not aware as to whether any application was made in the Ref. NTB -1 of 1990. It is correct to say that the Technicians are now redesignated as Service Engineers but the grade is same . The Service Engineers in the Painter Category are paid 75 % Performance Linked Incentives according to the Settlement . Other Service Engineers are getting 100% Performance Linked Incentive .

5. The contention of the management is that the workmen are bound by the terms and conditions of the Settlement dated 31-5-1996 . It is binding under section 18 (1 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The classification of the workmen is based on reasonable and intelligible differentia. They have been paid Production Linked Incentives as per terms and conditions of the Settlements which has been accepted by majority of the workmen of Air India . There is no question of any discrimination with the workmen in question . One of the workman to the reference in question Mr. G.A. Pandirkar is a signatory to the Settlement in his capacity as Joint Treasurer of the Union. It was not required by the management for approval of the Settlement by the National Industrial Tribunal. The copies of the Settlement had been sent to the Authorities concerned as contemplated in Rule 58(4) of the Central Rules . The Settlement in question was not arrived at under any Conciliation Proceedings . The Air India was not a party to the reference NTB - 1 of 1990 and hence the question of obtaining a consent Award by the National Industrial Tribunal , Mumbai was not required under the law .

6. The following Issues had been framed by the Predecessor in office:

(1) Whether the reference is maintainable for the reason it was not moved by the authorized trade union ?

(ii) Whether delay in moving the appropriate Government amounts to laches on the part of workmen and reference is not maintainable on account of delay and laches ?

9. 1 have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. The main point for consideration in this reference out of the Issues framed by the predecessor in office as referred to above , is as to whether the Settlement dated 31-5-96 in question has a binding effect upon the workmen under this reference. The admitted position is that the Settlement in question was arrived at in between the parties and also the management of Air India Ltd. and the Air India Employees Guild. It specifies the criteria for introduction of Performance Linked Incentive scheme . According to this settlement Master Technician , Senior Master Technician , Foreman , Senior Foreman . Tailor/Carpenter/ Welder/Painter categories are governed under support for aircraft production . There is no dispute about these facts . The workmen in question are painters and thus they are directly governed under support for aircraft production.

(iii) Whether Shri J.Y. Gaikwad and 22 other workmen asnamed in the Reference Order are entitled to the benefits ofPerformance Linked Incentive Scheme at the rates as applied to other Technicians of Engineering Department whose services are also directly related to Aircraft Production ?

10. The contention of the workmen is that they should be paid 100% Productivity Linked Insurance since they are directly related to aircraft production and they are not bound by the terms of the Settlement .

(iv) Whether the action of the management of Air India in discriminating ShriJ.Y . Gaikwad and 22 other workmen in the matter of payment ofperformance linked incentives at par with other Aircraft Technicians is legal and justified?

(v) What relief if any of the workmen are entitled to by way of award ?

11. The contention of the workmen does not have any merits . The first most important reason is that it was a Settlement arrived at in between the employees and the managenent . It was not a settlement which was arrived at before any Conciliation Proceedings . Secion 18 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 reads as under:

18. Persons on whom settlements and awards are binding

(1) A settlement arrived at by agreement between the employer and workman otherwise than in the course of conciliation proceeding shall be binding on the parties to the agreement .

Shri J.Y. Gaikwad has filed his own affidavit for the workmen . The facts uttered in Statement of Claim had been reiterated . The only contention is the Settlement dated 31-5-1996 cannot be stated to be binding upon the workmen since the Settlement has not been approved by the National Industrial Tribunal in view of the proceedings pending under Ref. NTB - 1 of 1990. No approval was ever obtained by the management from the National Industrial Tribunal . The workmen cannot be deprived of the benefit of 100% performance linked incentives .

(2) [subject to the provisions ofsub - section (3) , an arbitration award which has become enforceable shall be binding on the parties to the agreement who referred the dispute to arbitration.] 7. The aforesaid witness in his cross examination admitted that he joined Air India on 03-2-1975 . I am now retired from service . He was a member of the Air India Employces Union . All the workmen under reference were 13499 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10 , 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(3) A settlement arrived at in the course of conciliation proceedings under the Act or [an arbitration award in a case where a notification has been issued under sub -section (3A) of Section 104] or [an award (of a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal) which has become enforceable] shall ; be binding on-

(a) all parties to the industrial dispute;

inhand the perusal of the settlement in question (ExM - 1) goes to show that its copies were endorsed to (i) Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Mumbai, ( ii ) Regional Labour Commissioner (C) , Mumbai, (iii ) Chief Labour Commissioner (C) , New Delhi (iv ) The Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi . The law requires this much only that the copies of the Settlement shouldbe sent to the authorities mentioned under Rule 58 (4) quoted above. The evidence has been led by the management that these copies were actually sent to the parties concerned. It amounts to sufficient compliance of the law.

(b) all other parties summoned to appear in the proceedings, as parties to the dispute, unless the Board [ arbitrator] Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be, records the opinion that they were so summoned without proper cause

(c) Where a party referred to in clause (9a) or clause (b) is an employer his heirs , successors or assigns in respect of the establishment to which the dispute relates;

(d) Where aparty referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) is composed ofworkmen, all persons who were employed in the establishment or part of the establishment. , as the case may be , to which the dispute relates on the date of the dispute and all persons who subsequently become employed in that estblishment or part.

14. The submission made by the learned counsel for the workmen that no notice under Section 9 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 was issued by the management has no force because the settlement was arrived at in between the parties. There is no change in service conditions . No doubt, the pay scales of parties Technicians and Senior Aircraft Technician are the same but that by itself does not give a right to the workmen to claim for the payment ofProductivity Linked Insurance at par with the other Aircraft Technicians who are directly governed with the Production . In fact , the claim of the workmenunder reference is specifically barred by the terms and conditions of the settlement in question which has a binding effect under law . The workmen cannot escape from itat a later stage. Had there been no settlement, the workmen could have stated above the discrimination. In the instant case workmen are bound by the terms and conditions of the Settlement. I do not find any material whatsoever for which it may be inferred that the workmen are not bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement.

Sub -section 1 of Section 18 , quoted above clearly lays down that the Settlement arrived at by agreement between the employer and the workmen otherwise than in the course of Conciliation Proceedings shall be binding on the parties to the agreement .

19. Now I proceed to decide other issues framed in the reference in question.

Rule 58(4) of the Rules framed under the Industrial Dispute ( Central ) Rules 157 reads as under:

16. Regarding the Issue No.1 , I have to say that there is nothing on record to show for which it may be concluded that the reference is not maintainable . It has been moved by a authorized person on behalf of the workmen. Nothing is there to draw any otherwise inference .

"Where a settlement is arrived at in the between an employer and his workmen otherwise than in the course of conciliation proceeding before a Board or a Conciliation Officer, the parties to the settlement shall jointly send a copy thereof to the Central Government, the Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) , New Delhi , and the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) and to theAssistant Labour Commissioner ( Central) concerned .

17. Regarding Issue No. 21 have to say that I do not find any latches for which the workmen could be said to be at fault. There is no delay for moving to the appropriate Government for the reference . It is a different matter as to whether it has some ftterits or not .

18. Issue Nos.3 and 4 are already dealt with above .

1 It is true the Settlement in question was not got approved by the National Industrial Tribunal , Mumbai but it was not required under the law. The contention in this respect is devoid of force. The pendency of NTB - 1 of 1990 too does not make any difference. The instant settlement in question was not brought to the notice of National Industrial Tribunal in the aforesaid reference since Air India was not a party at that time.

19. Regarding Issue No. 5, in view of what has been discussed above , I conclude that the workmen under reference in question are not entitled to the benefits at the rates as applied to other Technicians of Engineering Department and that the action of the management of Air India in not treating the workmen under reference in payment of Performance Linked Incentive at par with other Technicians of the Engineering Department is legal and justified. The workmen are not entitled to any relief.

20. The reference is answered accordingly .

JUSTICE GHANSHYAMDASS, Presiding Officer 13. The rule 58 sub - clause (4) referred to above further goes to show that the only compliance which was under the law for making the settlement in question as binding one , is that the parties to the settlement shall jointly send a copy thereof to the Central Government , the ChiefLabour Commissioner (C) Mumbai , New Delhi and the Regional Labour Commissioner (C) Mumbai and to the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) concerned. In the case

3423 G1 /05-25 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13500

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4668.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 143/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/360/95- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st November , 2005 S.O. 4668.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 143/ 96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, Dhanbad-II , now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2005 .

[No. L-20012/360/95 - IR (C- I ) ] S.S. GUPTA Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

Shri B. Biswas, Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D.Act. , 1947.

Reference No , 143 of 1996

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management ofLodna Area of M/s . BCCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. B.B. Pandey , Ld. Advocate

Onbehalf of the employers: Mr. D.K. Verma , Ld . Advocate

Industry : Coal State Jharkhand

Dated, Dhanbad, the 28th October , 2005

AWARD

TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of thepowers conferred on them under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L-20012/ 360/95 - IR (Coal- I) dated, the 7th November, 1996.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Lodna Area of M/ s . BCCL in dismissing Shri Birendra Kumar, Bill Clerk from service of the Company is justified If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

2. The case of the concerned workman according to written statement submitted by the sponring union on his behalf in brief is as follows:

The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman was Bill Clerk at Lodna Colliery under the management . They submitted that management issued a chargesheetdt . 7-5-91 on the allegation of committing misconduct but could not submit reply to the same as he left for his home on getting information about illness of his wife , after giving due intimation to the management.

They alleged that thereafter the Disciplinary Authority initiated domestic enquiry against him appointing enquiry officer . The said Enquiry Officer conducted that domestic enquiry exparte against the concerned workman and submitted his report . The Disciplinary Authority thereafter dismissed him from service w.e.f. 18-2-92 illegally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice as no opportunity was given to him to defend his case . Accordingly he raised Industrial Dispute before ALC ( C) for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication .

The sponsoring union accordingly submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman to his service with back wages and other consequential benefit setting aside the said order of dismissal.

3.Management on the contrary after filing written statement cum rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman.

They submitted that the concerned workman while postedasBillClerk in the year 1991 committed misconducts in the matter of preparation of false bills in favour of different workmen and for which a chargesheet was issued to him under clause 26 : 1 : 2 and 26: 1 : 11 of the Certified Standing Order applicable to the establishment of the management.

They alleged that the concerned workman prepared false bills in favour of Narain Bauri , Bandhu Dusad , Sukdeo Pasi , Md . Suluddin and others indicating them that they were on earned leave or sick leave although during the aforesaid period for which he prepared the bills they were verymuch on duty and they received wages for performing duties after getting their attendance marked in the attendance register. His such acts exposed that he prepared 13501 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Negligence or neglect of duty, malignoring slowing down ofwork of inciting others to do so, while clsuse 26 : 1 : 11 speaks of theft , fraud or dishonesty in connection with companies business or property .

false bills either in connivance with those workmen or without their knowledge or consent with the intention to misappropriate the money of the management and in this way he misappropriated the money of the management .

The charges of committing misconduct are as follows:

They submitted that after receipt of the chargesheet concerned workman submitted his replydt . 26-6-91 denying all the charges brought against him but as his replywas otsatisfactory Disciplinary Authority decided to hold domestic enquiry against him and appointed H. Sarin , Deputy Personnel Manager as Enquiry Officer while S. Dey , Senior Finance Officer was appointed as management representative to present the case of the management before Enquiry Officer .

"That the concerned workman prepared bills in favour of S / Sri Narain Bouri , Bandhu Dusad, Sukhdeo Pasi , Md. Suluddin and others falsely indicating them that they were on earned leave or they were on sick leave although during the aforeaid period for which he prepared the bills , they were very much on duty and they received wages for performing duties after getting their attendances marked in the attendance register .

That the concerned workman committed various irregularities which clearly indicated that he booked bills either with the connivance of the workmen concerned or without therir knowledge or consent and misappropriated the amount by pútting their false LTIs on the said bills . Hisvarious acts amounted to negligence of performance ofduties ."

They disclosed that after taking charge of the Enquiry Proceedings the Enquiry Officer issued several notices to the concerned workman for causing his appear- ance at the time of hearing but as all attempt failed notice to enquiry was published in the local news paper. In spite of publishing the notice in the newspaper when the concerned workman ignored to appear the Enquiry officer conducted hearing of the enquiry proceedings exparte and submitted his report holding him guilty to the charges brought against himdt. 16-1-92 the Disciplinary Authority thereafter considering the said report and also considering all other material aspects dismissed the concerned workman from his service by letter dt. 18-2-92 and in doing so they submitted that neither they committed any illegality nor took any arbitrary decision.

Accordingly, they submitted prayer to pass award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman.

4. Points to be Decided

Ittranspires from the evidence of M. W. 1 that after taking charge of the enquiry proceeding he issued notice tothe concerned workman for causing his appearance at the time of hearing of the enquiry proceeding but as he ignored to appear the notices of enquiry were published in the local newspaper " Aaj & Awaj ' ' . M. W. I further disclosed that in spite of publishing notice in the newspaper as the concerned workman failed to appear hearing of the enquiry proceeding was take up exparte and after completion of hearing he submitted his report holding him guilty to the charges brought against him . The enquiry report during evidence of M. W. I was marked in Exht. M-8.

"Whether the action of the management of Lodna Area ofM/s . BCCL in dismissing Shri Birendra Kumar, Bill Clerk from service ofthe Company is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? "

5. Finding with Reasons

It transpires from the record that before taking up hearing of this case on merit it was taken into consideration ifdomestic enquiry held against the concerned workman in view of chargesheet issued to him was fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice . The said issue on preliminary point was disposed of in favour ofthe management vide order No. 32 dt. 5-4-2005.

Accordingly, here the point for consideration is if the management have been able to substantiate the charge brought against the concerned workman and if so whether there is scope to review the order ofdismissal issued against him relying on the provision as laid down u/s II . A of the Industrial Dispute Act.

Ld. Advocate for the concerned workman in course of hearing on preliminary point categorically submitted that he had nothing to say about fairness of the enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer . During cross examination ofM.W. I it is evident that not a single question was put to him about the charges brought against the concerned workman. It transpires from the Enquiry proceeding papers that S. Dey, Sr, Finance Officer being PresentingOfficer not only submitted a written report but also made his statement wherein he described the misconduct which the concerned workman committed. If the enquiry report is taken into consideration it will expose clearly the gross negligence which he committed at the time of discharging his duties as Bill Clerk . It has been further exposed that for his negligent act workmen had not only been paid wrongly but also he made false booking. In course of hearing the sponsoring union has failed to adduce any evidence rebuting the claim of the management . I have carefully considered the enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer and I find no dispute to hold that the management have been able to substantiate the charges brought against the concerned workman.

During evidence of M. W. I the charge sheet issued to the concerned workman was marked as Exht . M - I . As per chargesheet two fold charges have been brought against him viz . under clause 26: 1 (2) and 26: 1 : 11 of the Certified Standing Order , Clause 26: 1: 02 speaks of Habitual [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10, 2005/AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

13502

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005 It transpires that the Disciplinary Authority after considering enquiry report and alos considering other materials on record dismissed the concerned workman from service w.e.f. 18-2-92 the letter of dismissal during evidence of M. W.1 was marked as Exht .M- 9 .

का. आ. 4669.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भा. को. को. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 103/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Now thepoint for consideration is whether the order ofdismissal issued against the concerned workman was justified and proportionate to the misconduct committed by him and also if there is any scope to review the said order of dismissal based on the provision as laid down U/s 11 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act .

[सं० एल-20012/316/94- आई आर ( सी-1) ] एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव Section 11 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act speaks asfollows :

New Delhi , the 21st November, 2005

S.O. 4669.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 103/ 95) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court Dhanbad- II now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 21-11-2005.

[No. L-20012/316/94 - IR (C-I) ] S. S. GUPTA , Under Secy.

"Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge of dismissal of a workman has been referredto a Labour Court , Tirbunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and , in the course of the adjudication proceedings, the Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal , as the case may be , is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not jutified, it may , by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions , if any , as it thinks fit, or give such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of dishcharge of dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require . "

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT:

SHRI B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO. 103 OF 1995

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the managerment of Bastacolla Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen.

Ittranspires from the record that management had been forced to issue charge -sheet against the concerned workman for committing misconduct on the ground of gross negligence to his work while he was posted as Bill Clerk.During hearing management have placed all material ingredients which exposed gross negligence committed by him while he was in charge ofBill Clerk and consequent to which management had to face monetary loss . It is the specific allegation of the management that the misdeeds which he committed was in connivance with other workman or in their absence to grab their money by submitting false bills . In course of hearing of this case full opportunity was given to the sponsoring union to disprove the allegation brought against him but they have lamentably failed to avail the said opportunity .

APPEARENCES :

Onbehalf of the workman Mr. B. Lal and Mr. K. Singh , Advocate .

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. S. N. Sinha , Advocate. State:Jharkhand Industry : Coal .

Dated , Dhanbad, the October, 2005 . AWARD

Considering all aspects carefully there is sufficient reason to believe that the misconduct which the concerned workman committed was really serious in nature. As Bill Clerk he grossly misused his power not only but also incur disfaith in the mind of the management for his distrustful acts . Accordingly considering gravity of the offence committed by him there is sufficient scope to say that his dismissal from service by the management was absolutely justified and proportionate to the offence committed by him and for which there is no scope to review the order of his dismissal u/s 11 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act.

In the result the following award is rendered:

TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L- 20012/ 316/94- IR (Coal - I ) , dated the 9th August , 1995.

SCHEDULE ""That the action of the management of Lodna Area ofM/s. BCCL in dismissing Sri Birendra Kumar , Bill Clerk from service of the company isjustified .

Consequently, he is not entitled to get any relief. " B. BISWAS, Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the management of Bastacolla Colliery of M / s . BCCL in dismissing 13503

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

S/Shri Tulsi Prasad , Mahadeo Dusadh, Tapesar Nonia and Ram Sahay Koiri with effect from 22-11- 93 isjustified ? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled ?"

2. Case of the concerned workmen according to written statement submitted by the sponsoring union on their behalf in brief is as follows :-

They submitted that on 22-11-93 , Agent, Bastacolla Colliery went to visit to Victory Section of that colliery at about 8.30 A.M. and thereafter one of the concerned workman i. e. Tulsi Prasad who was on duty on that day was called on by the said Agent through his Attendance Clerk. When he came he was asked by the Agent to clear the stool of the dogs lying in the campus of the office .As said workman Tulsi Prasad refused to carry out the said order disclosing that he was not sweeper , all of a sudden the Agent caught hold his neck and started assaulting him mercilessly. They submitted that Tulsi Prasad is a patient of epilepsy and for which as a result of such assault he became senseless . On seeing that ineident a mob being gathered on the spot rescued Shri Prasad from the grip of that Agent. Thereafter over the said incident General Manager , IX dismissed the concerned workmen i , e . Tulsi Prasad and other workment viz . Mahadeo Dusadh , Tapeswar Nonja and Ram Sahai Koiri from service vide letter No. BC.IX. 6-A: 93/1/6372 dt. 23rd November, 1993 . They alleged that the management also lodged FIR against the concerned workment over that incident. It has been submitted by them that management illegally and arbitrarily voilating the principles of natural justice and without giving slightest opportunity to defend their case dismissed them from service based on absolutely false allegations . Thereafter the sponsoring union raised industrial dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal . They submitted prayer to pass award directing the management to reinstate the concerned workmen in their service with all consequential reliefs.

victory section of the colliery . They alleged that Tulsi Prasaddisobeyed the instruction of Shri Verma with a view to undermine the authority . Even he did not pay any heed to the request of the Agent in the matter of cleaning and sweeping the tables and chairs of the office . Thereafter said Agent asked Tulsi Prasad to sit outside the office during the full duty hours as he got his attendance marked as he was not willing to carry on duties allotted to him . As a result, saidTulsi Prasad being furious started abusing the Agent in filthy language and at his instigation other concerned workmen came to the spot . A mob also assembled there and thereafter they jointly attacked the Agent i.e. Shri H. N. Singh . Being afraid when the Agent closed his door inside , they breaking open the said door entered inside the room and started assaulting him by fist andblows and with the help of other articles . As a result he sustained serious bleeding injuries to his person. Over that incident on the same day a FIR was lodged at the local P.S. They disclosed that the General Manager , Bastacolla Area after considering all the facts and circumstances and also considering seriousness of the incident recommended dismissal of the concerned workmen to CMD for his approval . Thereafter on getting approval from the CMD , General Manager , Bastacolla dismissed the concerned workmen for commission of the misconducts under clause 26.1.2 . , 26.1.4, 26.1.10, 26.1.14 and 26.1.16 of the certified standing order applicable to that establishment. They submitted that in order to bring normalcy and restore discipline the General Manager could not wait indefinitely for holding departmental enquiry as the enquiry could not be carried on with such tense situation and the management cannot close down the minc ofthe area till the matter was finalised and for the purpose ofbringing normalcy and restoring discipline amongst the workmen, immediate steps of summary dismissal was initiated and with the approval of the CMD the concerned workmen were dismissed from services summarily. They submitted that such order of dismissai considering the seriousness of the offence committed by the concerned workmen were bona fide and justified and for which they are not entitled to get relicf.

4. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

"Whether the action of the management of Bastacolla Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in dismissing S/Shri Tulsi Prasad, Mahadeo Dusadh, Tapesar Nonia and Ram Sahay Koiri with effect from 22-11-93 is justified ? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled ? "

5. FINDING WITH REASONS

3. Management on the contrary after filing written statement-cum- rejoinder have denied all the claims and allegations which the sponsoring unions asserted in the written statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workmen . They submitted that on 22-11-93 at about 8.30 A.M. the Project Officer/Agent of Bastacolla Colliery Mr. H.N. Singh went to Victory Section of the colliery and found that the office of that section was full of dust and office table and chairs were also not clean , even unsuitable for sitting in the chairs . Accordingly he directed the Attendance Clerk to get the same cleaned properly. Thereafter the said Attendance Clerk advised Tulsi Prasad, on of the concerned workmen to perform the job ofdusting and cleaning the tables and chairs so that the Agent could carry out his duties without delay . They submitted that said Tulsi Prasad was originally a Miner/ Loader but thercafter at his request he was offered light duty to work as sweeping and cleaning mazdoor at the office of the

It transpires from the record that management with a vicw to substantiate their claim examined three witnesses viz . MW - 1 , MW-2 and MW - 3 while the sponsoring union also examined two witnesses i.e. WW- 1 and WW- 2 in support of their claim. MW - 1 during his evidence disclosed that on 22-11-93 while he was a Project Officer/ Agent of Bastacolla Colliery went to Victory Section of [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 10 , 2005/AGRAHAYΑΝΑ 19 , 1927

13504

the facts disclosed in the pleadings of the concerned workmenis taken into consideration it reveals very clearly that Tulsi Prasad one of the concerned workman was present at victory section at about 8.30 A.M. when MW- li . e . the Agent came there . The sponsoring union in their written statement also admitted the fact that being dissatisfied with the uncleaned campus of the office the Agent asked his attendance clerk Mr. U.S. Verma to give necessary instruction to said Tulsi Prasad to clean the campus . But as he refused to do the said Agent became furious and caught hold his neck , assaulted him seriously for which he became senseless as he was a patient of epilepsy . Therefore , if the facts disclosed in the pleading submitted by the sponsoring union is taken into consideration it will expose clearly that there was an incident happened in the premises of victory section on that relevant day . While it is the specific claim of the management that the concerned workman assaulted the Agent seriously as he refused to carry on the work of cleaning being directed by the Agent , the sponsoring union submitted that it was the Agent who assaulted Tuls Prasad, concerned workman severely . However , it is clear from the Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union that Tulsi Prasad, workman refused to folow the direction of the Agent to clean the campus of the premises . This act on his part definitely should be considered as wilful disobedience of the direction of the superior authority . Considering the pleading of both sides and also evidence of MW- I it is seen that both sides have made allegations and counter allegations against each other . Over that incident on the same day management lodged FIR against the concerned workman at local P.S. and the local P.S. started criminal case and after investigation submitted chargesheet against them under Section 323 / 324/427/448 Ι.Ρ.C. The said case was registered as G.R. Case No. 4480/93 /T.R . No. 985/99 . It is not evident if the sponsoring union lodged any criminal case against the Agentofthe colliery over that incident. No evidence also is forthcoming to establish that actually Tulsi Prasad was seriously assaulted by the Agent i.e. MW- 1 . It is seen that in the said criminal case which was pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class was ended in acquittal. Certified copy of the judgement during evidence was marked as Ext . W- 1 . As the prosecution failed to substantiate the allegations with cogent reasons . The said Criminal Case was ended in acquittal .

From the evidence of MW-1 as well as MW- 3 it transpires that as a result of such assault said MW - 1 i.e. Agent H.N. Singh was seriously injured and sustained bleeding injury on his head and was taken to colliery hospital for his treatinent . With utter surprise it is notified thatmanagement in course of hearing has failed to produce a single scrap of medical papers to establish that as a result of that incident he was seriously injured. MW- 1 i.c. Agent is the injured. It is not the case that when the incident Bastacolla for inspection. After arrival there he noticed thatthe office of the victory section was not clean and for which he directed U.S. Verma, Attendance clerk to take steps to clean the office . On receipt of the said direction the Attendance Clerk directed Tulsi Prasad to clean the said office as he was Genl. Mazdoor posted there . But said Tulsi Prasad refused to carry out work . He disclosed that said Tulsi Prasad was a Miner/Loader but on his prayer he was given light job and posted in the office . This witness disclosed that as Tulsi Prasad refused to clean the office on the basis of his verbal direction he directed him to resume his original duty as Miner/Loader. However , before reverting him back to his original post he also directed him to clean the office but again he refused to do so. Accordingly he asked him to sit outside on a stool during duty hours. As a result he became furious and thereafter with his associates i.e. the concerned workmen Tapeswar Nonia , Mahadeo Dusadh and Ram Sahay Koiri came to his office and assaulted him brutally for which he sustained bleeding injury on his head. He then reported this matter to the General Manager and thereafter the concerned workmen were dismissed from his service . MW- 2 during his evidance produced certain documents on behalf of the management marked as Ext. M - 1 and M - 2 , while MW- 3 during his evidence disclosed that during the year 1993 he was posted at Bastacolla Colliery as siding Incharge . He disclosed that on 22-4-93 in the morning he was proceeding to Chandmari office driving his Motor Cycle and the Agent Mr. H. N. Singh i.e. MW - 1 was a Pillion rider of his Motor Cycle . He disclosed that on the way said Mr. H.N. Singh got down infront of his office and thereafter he left the place for office duty , which was about 200 yards away from the office ofthe Agent i.c. Mr. H.N. Singh . He disclosed that when he was on duty he heard a hue and cry and came to know that Mr. H.N. Singh i.e. the Project Officer was assaulted. On receiving that news he rushed to the office of the Agent and found the Agent i . e. MW - 1 there with bleeding injury on his head . On seeing that scene he rushed to the CISF camp and informed them about the incident in question and on receiving this news CISF personnel came to the spot and took the Agent i . e . MW- 1 to the hospital . He accompanied theAgent to hospital but failed to say anything about the incident. Considering evidence of MW - 3 . It is seen that he was not an eye witness of the incident but he only came to the spot on hearing the incident . This witness also disclosed actually if the concerned workmen were involved in assulting MW- 1 or not . From the evidence of MW- 1 i.e. the Agent it transpires clearly that his attendance clerk Mr. U. S. Verma was present on the spot when the said incident took place but the management did not consider necessary to examine him as witness in the instant case for the reason best known to them . WW-2. who is one of the concerned workman in the instant case during his evidence failed to disclose about the incident in question alleged to have been happened on 22-4-93. If 13505 [भाग II--- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19 , 1927

26.1.10 Wilful insubordination or disobedience of any lawful reasonable order of higher authority.

26.1.14 Assaulting or intimidating workman/ employee of the company in the Company's work premises or estates .

26,1.16 To bring any political or other outside influence to bear upon any superior authorities .

Para-3

1 consider that all the above acts of misconduct committed by S/Shri Tulsi Prasad, Mahadeo Dusadh , Tapeswar Nonia and Ram Sahai Koiri are extremely serious in nature and no management can countenance such serious acts of misconduct and criminal acts committed with impunity or condone such miscounted. It is not possible to allow such persons to remain in the service of BCCL ifdiscipline is to be maintained and workers deterred from taking law into their hands and causing murderous attack to the head of the Unit i.e. Project Officer/Agent which may lead to life of the employee concerned.

In this view of the matter , I have decided that S / Shri Tulsi Prasad, M/ Loader working as cleaning/ sweeping Mazdoor, Mahadeo Dusadh , Banksman , Tapeswar Nonia , Drillman Ram Sahai Koiri , M/Loader working as Fireman of Bastacolla Colliery should be summarily dismissed from service forthwith. Such persons cannot be allowed to remain in the service of the company even if for a single day. I , therefore hereby dismiss them from the services of Bastacolla Colliery / BCCL forthwith and they will accordingly cease to be in the service of Bastacolla Colliery/BCCL with immediate effect.

Para 4.

took place he was alone present there and for which management could not procure any witness of the incident in question. Therefore , in this particular case evidence of eye witness was very much essential to establish the authenticity of the incident in question. But attitude of the management shows clearly that they were not interested to produce any such witness though they considered that acts of the concerned workmen amounted to serious indisciplinary acts and for which their dismissal from service were urgently required. The incident in question took place on 22-11-93 . After that incident on the sameday the said Project Officer submitted a report to the General Manager , Bastacolla area wherein he disclosed how that incident took place and who were involved and how he sustained injury to his person . Though he submitted report, he did not enclose any statement of U.S. Verma, Attdt. Clerk who although remained present with the said Agent . G.M. Bastacolla area suggested dismissal ofthe concemed workmen from service taking the ground thatformal disciplinary procedure would take time and in that case discipline of the colliery will be affected. He passed his view to that effect based on this enquiry made by him . Management in course of hearing did not consider necessary to submit enquiry report which the G.M. Bastacolla area prepared on his personal enquiry over the incident in question. The said report of the Agent followed by recommendation of the G.M. Bastacolla area for dismissal of the concerned workmen during evidence of MW-2 was marked as Ext. M - 1 while dismissal order was marked as Ext . M- 2 . The concerned workmen were dismissed from service by order dt. 23-11-93 i. e. the said dismissal order was issued on the next day of the incident in question . In paras 2 , 3 and 4 of the letter of dismissal management made clear observation before the concerned workmen were dismissed from his service . The observations made are as follows :-

Para-2

I find that in the prevailing situation and circumstances it is not possible to go through the normal procedure of domestic enquiry in the interest of BCCL . However , if and when occasion arises , the Management shall produce necessary evidence before the appropriate forum for providing the aforesaid acts of misconduct of S/ Shri Tulsi Prasad, M/Loader working as Cleaning/ Sweeping Mazdoor , Mahadeo Dusadh, Banksman , Tapeswas Nonia, Drillman, Ram Sahai Koiri , M/Loader working as Fireman and justify its action .

I have gone through the reports submitted by Shri H.N. Singh , Project Officer/Agent received by me and made enquiries from the officers/ officials/workers concerned and I am satisfied that S/Shri Tulsi Prasad, Mahadeo Dusadh , Tapeswar Nonia, Ram Sahai Koiri committed various acts as referred to in foregoing paragraphs which constitute very serious acts of misconduct besides criminal acts . I have also come to the conclusion that S/ Sri Tulsi Prasad , Mahadeo Dusadh , Tapeswar Nonia and Ram Sahai Koiri and others committed the advocats on ulterior motives . The above acts of misconduct committed by them attract the various provisions of certified standing orders for workmen of Establishment under BCCL as indicated below:

26.1.2

Habitual negligence or neglect of duty , malingering slowing down of work or inciting others to do so.

26.1.4

Riotous or disorderly behaviour, threatening or coercing other workmen or interference with the work of other workmen .

Clause 26 of the Certified Standing Order for workmen of the establishment under BCCL have clearly made out which acts amount to misconduct . Following the said Certified Standing Order its has been observed by the management that the concerned workmen committed misconduct for violating of clause 26.1.2 , 26.1.4, 26.1.10, 26.1.14 and 26.1.16 . Clause 27 (2 ) of the Certified Standing Order has pointed out clearly which major penalty a workman deserves if such misconduct is established against him . Major penalty has been defined in clause 29 (1) ( ii ) and if any such major penalty is proved the [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 13506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

Management in course of hearing did not consider necessary to assign any reason under which circumstances said Tapeswar Noina was reinstate in service and why withdrawal of dismissal order against other workmen were not considered. This should be considered another glaring example which will show how in arbitary manner and following pick and choose policy Management did not consider the case of the rest three workmen .

disciplinary authority is competent to dismissal or discharge a workman from service but before taking any such disciplinary action as per clause 27 (2) of the Certified Standing Order the disciplinary authority shall inform in writing of the allegations to the concerned workman and also shall give him opportunity to explain his conduct within a period of days . This word " shall " is to be construed as mandatory provision which the disciplinary authority must follows . It is seen that the disciplinary authority did not consider necessary to give the concerned workmen minimum opportunity to submit their explanation against the allegation of the misconduct committed by them.

Clause 28 of the Certified Standing Order speaks as follows:-

"Where a workman has been convicted for a criminal offence in a Court of law or where the Chairman/ Managing Director of the Company is satisfied for reasons to be recorded in writing that it is inexpedient or against the interest of security to continue to employ the workman, the workman may be removed or discharged from services without following the procedure laid down in standing order No. 27. "

The allegation brought against the concerned workmen appears to be very serious in nature. There is no dispute to hold that in spite of pendency of any criminal case there was no bar to proceed with the departmental proceeding against the concerned workmen . It is seen that management did not follow that course taking the ground as laid down in para 2 , 3 and 4 of the order of dismissal . Every workman holds his democratic right to defend the allegation of misconduct which has been brought against him. Management had ample scope to initiate departmental enquiry proceeding against the concerned workmen suspending them from service but they did not consider necessaryto follow that course . They even did not consider necessary to issue any chargesheet against them and no opportunity was given to them to submit any reply before taking such drastic step . It is seen that the concerned workmenwere acquitted from all charges brought against them when Ld . Magistrate disposed of that criminal case. The said judgement and order was passed on 2-9-99 . It is seen that during pendency of that criminal case the order ofdismissal against Tapeswar Nonia was withdrawn . This act of the management will expose their absolute biasness and arbitrary decision .

I consider that every workman deserves his right to defend his case before any penalty is imposed on him. Unconstitutionally management ignoring this aspect in a most illegal and arbitrary manner dismissed the concerned workmen from their service which cannot be upheld in any manner in any circumstances .

I therefore , hold that management illeally, arbitrarily and violating the principle of natural justice dismissed the concerned workmen from their service . In the result , the following Award is rendered:-

Therefore , according to this clause the Disciplinary authority can dismiss any workman without following the provision of clause 27. The dismissal order Ext . M - 2 is absolutely silent if following clause 28 of the Certified S.O. the concerned workmen were dismissed from their service or not . As per clause 28 the primary requirement which is to be established by the disciplinary authority is that if CMD is satisfied for reasons to be recorded in writing with its expedient or against the interest of the security to continue to employ the workman may be removed or discharged from service . Therefore, this provision of clause 28 exclusively can be applied only by the Chairman or Managing Director of the company and for doing so the reasons should be recorded in writing . Here in the instant case no such order of dismissal was issued by the Chairman orManaging Director of the company . On the contrary it was issued by the G. M. who is not at all competent to pass any such order, Moreover not a single scrap of paper is forth coming before the Tribunal that the matter was placed before the CMD /Managing Director of the company who was satisfied for the reasons recorded in writing over the misconduct committed by the concerned workmen. Untill and unless such report is forthcoming before this Tribunal there is sufficient reason to draw conclusion that in a most illegal and arbitrary way the G. M. Bastacolla Area took the power of the CMD /Managing Director in hand and dismissed the concerned workmen from their services.

"The action of the management of Bastacolla area ofM/ s BCCL in dismissing Tulsi Prasad, Mahadeo Dusadh and Ram Sahay Koiri w.e.f. 22-11-93 is not justified. Accordingly order of dismmisal issued against these workmendt . 23-11-93 is hereby set aside. Management is directed to reinstate the concerned workmen Mahadeo Dusadh and Ram Sahay Koiri in their service within 3 months from the date of publication of the Award in the Gazette of India without any back wages. However, they will get continuity of service for the interest of their retirement benefit. As per the death certificate Tulsi Prasad died on 24-9-2001. Accordingly his legal heirs will be entitled to get all monetary benefits During hearing it is seen that one of the concerned workman Tapeswar Noina who was dismissed along with otherworkmen was reinstated in his service in persuance of letter No. BCCL / BA/ BC/P -2/95 /597 dt. 25-2-95.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

till the date of his death. barring back wages and other consequential reliefs . As Tapeswar Nonia has already reinstated in service this award will not be applicable to him. "

13507

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

service rendered by him in DTC before joining Air India as Jr. Operator (Trainee) w.e.f. 15-7-1991 is just and proper ? If not,

(1) Whether the workman is entitled to count his service rendered in DTC?

B. BISWAS , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4670.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयर इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली- II के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 98/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2005 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -11012/70/2000- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] (2) Whether the training period would constitute a break , or dies non , or would count towards service rendered with Air India and for what benefits . What directions are required to be given in this regard . "

एस. एस. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st November, 2005 S.O. 4670.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 98/ 2000) of the Cenral Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, New Delhi - II now as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2005 .

[No. L. - 11012/70/2000 - IR (C -I) ] S. S. GUPTA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-II, DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER: R. N. RAI L.D. No. 98/2000 In the Matter of:-

Shri Sukhdev Singh Sandhu , S/o . Late Mukhtiar Singh , R/ o . C-3 / 63 -A, Lawrence Road, Delhi.

VERSUS

AirIndia,

Through its Managing Director, IGI International Airport , Terminal-2 , New Delhi-37 New Delhi --110001 .

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/70/ 2000 (C -1) Central Governmentdt. 29-8-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:-

"Whether the action of the management of Air India in not allowing Shri S. S. Sandhu continuity of

342391/05-26

The workman applicant has filed claim statement . In the statement of claim it is stated that the present claim is required to be filed by the workman to compute the service period ofhis employment from the date of appointment of the workman in DTC by the management . The workman has filed a letter referring his grievances therein which was not acceded to by the management on the basis of his representations before ALC , Government of India , New Delhi on dated 01-12-1996 as well as 31-05-1999 .

That the concerned Labour Commissioner after perusal ofthe documents filed by the parties to the dispute tried his best to settle the matter amicably but in vain. Hence the matter was sent for consideration to the Government, Ministry of Labour for reference vide order dated 09-03-2000 and thereafter the matter has been referred in the terms as mentioned in reference letter No. E- 11-12/70/2000 of dated 29-08-2000.

Thatthe brief fact of the case is this that the applicant has applied for the post of Junior Operator in the organization of the respondent against the advertisement published in the Newspaper namely Hindustan Times on dated 29-05-1989 through proper channel . It is pertinent to mention here that the applicant was employed by Delhi Transport Corporation on 10-07-1982 and had worked with DTC till 11-07-1991 and joined the management in this claim petition on 15-07-1991 as a Junior Operator trainee.

Thatafter completion of training period of one year i.e. 15-07-1992, the workman was forced to proceed on 30 days vacation , vide the letter of management dated 09-07-1992.

That thereafter as per the direction of the management the workman has rejoined the management on 14-08-1992 , on the basic pay ofRs . 1305/- . Thereafter, on completion of the probation of his six months period service of the workman was confirmed on 01-02-1993 , and since then the workman is working with the management .

That the workman has sent a letter of representation to the management through proper channel on dated 08-04-1993 , requesting thereby for adding of previous service in his service period with all consequential benefits. The letter dated 08-04-1993 , is enclosed herewith as mark "A" .

Thatthe management has sent the reply of the letter dated 08-04-1993 , vide letter dated 17-05-1993 , thereby [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 13508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 10, 2005 /AGRAHAYANA 19, 1927

been rightly denied by the management . The true and correct facts in their facto legal perspective are given hereunder:-

refusing to add the previous service in his present service . The true photocopy of the letter is enclosed here as marked "B" . Thereafter the workman has sent representations to the vaious authorities for the same reliefbut in vain . Hence the workman was constrained to take the legal action against the management.

1. The workman joined the management after completing necessary pre -employment formalities . That the workman accepted the terms and conditions of his traineeship contained in the letter of the management dated 06-05-1991 numbered as DAP/RMD-21 / 15 vide Acceptance Form duly signed by the workman on 06-06-1991 . Clause XV of letter dated 06-05-1991 accepted by the workman vide his Acceptance Form dated 06-06-1991 reads as follows:-

"The period of your training in the corporation will not be treated as service for any purpose , even should you be the employed by us on successful completion oftraining . "

That it is well settled law that ifan employee of one organization applies against the vacant post of other organization through proper channel and abide by all the terms and directions of the new organization is being added in the new organization in continuity and accordingly , all the legal benefits is given to the employee despite any agreement which has been placed before the employee by the management to execute or any rule or regulation framed bythe management or by any other organization applicable on the management is in contravention with the settled law.

2. The workman also entered into an agreement with themanagement on 12-06-1991 .

Clause 11 of the aforesaid agreement reads as follows:-

That the parties to the petition are working and operating its office from Delhi . Hence this Tribunal has territorialjurisdiction to entertain and maintain the present petition.

"Training period of Junior Operator ( Trainee ) will not be taken into account or treated as service period for any purpose , if he is employed in the corporation in its service on successsful completion of his training."

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement it is stated that the present claim is devoid ofmerits and hence not maintainable. The factual matrix of the case is that S. S. Sandhu ( hereinafter called the workman) joined the management on 14-08-1992 , as a probationer. It was only after completion of probation period that the service of the work man was confirmed w.e.f 01-02-1993 .

3. In view of the above it is crystal clear, that the workman was well aware of the condition that even the period of his training or the service rendered by him in DTC was not to be counted with the present service for any purpose . That , the workman chose to take up the issue at this belated stage after a gap of 10 years clearly supports the contention of the management .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder and in his rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.

It issubmitted that the workman pprior to joining the management as Junior Operator underwent a training course for a period of one year from 15-07-1991 under Junior Operator (Trainee) Scheme . As per terms of Clause IVof Letter ofthe management dated 06-05-1991 , it is clear thatcompletion of training does not ipso facto give any right to the workman to be appointed with management . The management had the option of appointing the workman if required. The said clause reads as under: -

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

"On successful completion of your training , the Corporationwill have the option to appoint you as a Junior Operator on probation for a period of six months .....

Thus, it is clear that the period of training , which was imparted only under a specific Scheme , could not be counted as work experience as per the mutually accepted terms and conditions . In view of this position it is clear that the claim of the workman that his past services with a different organization should be counted for " continuous service" is erroneous . That the workman was not working in any of the two organization on a permanent basis for more than one year i.e. from 11-07-1991 to 14-08-1992 , therefore the question of continuity of service does not arise at all, leave alone the claim of the workınan , which is to add his previous service rendered to DTC, which has

The workman applicant did not tum up and no argument has been advanced by the workman. He was not even present on two dates so the management was heard and the reference was reserved for award . The workman applicant has turned up on the previous dates and evidence of both the parties have been taken . No argument has been advanced from the side of the workman so this is not ex -parte case. The case of the workman applicant is that he applied for the post of Junior Operator in the organization of the respondents against the advertisement published in the newspaper Hindustan Times on 29-05-1989 through proper channel . He was employed by Delhi Transport Corporation since 1982 and he worked [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

13509

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 10, 2005/अग्रहायण 19, 1927

with the DTC till 1991 and joined the management in 1991 as ajunior operator. After completion of successful training he was appointed to the post . After his probation period he was confirmed to the post in 1993. The management is not treating his previous service in DTC as continuous service and he has not been given any credit of his previous service rendered by him in DTC .

It was submitted from the side of the management that he was appointed as a junior operator on probation period of six months. So his past service in DTC cannot be included in his service rendered under the management . It has been mentioned in his appointment letter that the period of his training in the Corporation will not be treated as service for any purpose even should he be employed by them on successful completion of training . As such his training period according to clause 11 of the agreement will not be counted as his service period. The workman hasjoined service on fresh terms and conditions and he is bound by the terms and conditions of his appointment letter. It has spelt in the agreement of the management that his training period will not be taken into account as his service period for any purpose. It implies that the workman joined the services of the respondents thinking it full well that his previous service in DTC will not be accounted. If the workmanjoined the services any terms and conditions which are not unconciable , he cannot claim that his previous service should be taken into account . The appointment under the management was absolutely of different nature . He was given, credit to his previous service rendered in a public undertaking of Delhi Government at the time of appointment so previous service cannot be takeninto account in calculating the service rendered under the present management. The case of the workman is devoid of any merit .

The reference is replied thus:-

The action of the management of Air India in not allowing Shri S. S. Sandhu continuity of service rendered by him in DTC before joining Air India as Junior Operator (Trainee) w.e.f. 15-07-1991 is just and proper. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

Award is given accordingly.

Date: 14-11--2005 .

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 नवम्बर, 2005

का. आ. 4671.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 दिसम्बर, 2005 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चूकी है ) अध्याय 5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध बिहार के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:-

क्र . राजस्व ग्राम राजस्व थाना थाना संख्या जिला सं. का नाम

का नाम

खगौल

म्युनिसपैल्टी (खगौल

म्युनिसपैल्टी (खगौल नगरपालिका )

1. सभी थाना संख्याजो खगौल पटना नगरपालिका) म्युनिसपैल्टी में पड़ता है

49 पटना 2. बड़ीखगौल दानापुर

39 पटना

दानापुर

3. आदमपुर

205 मुंगेर 4. विशनपुर जमालपुर

[सं. एस-38013/62/2005- एस एस-1 ] के. सी. जैन, निदेशक New Delhi , the 28th November, 2005 S.O. 4671. -In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st December , 2005 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapters V and VI [ except sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Bihar namely:---

Thana No. District

Name of the Revenue Thana

S. No. Name of the Revenue Village

1. Khagaul Khagaul Municipality

All revenue Patna thanas within the limits ofKhagaul municipality

Patna 2. Bari Khagaul Danapur

Patna

Danapur

3. Adampur

205

Jamalpur

4. Bishanpur

Munger

K. C. JAIN, Director [No. S- 38013/ 62/ 2005 - SS . - I ]

Printed by the Manager, Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054.