REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 46] No. 46)
नई दिल्ली , नवम्बर 11 नवम्बर 17, 2007 , शनिवार/ कार्तिक 20 - कार्तिक 26 , 1929 NEW DELHI , NOVEMBER 11 -- NOVEMBER 17, 2007, SATURDAY/ KARTIKA 20- KARTIKΑ 26, 1929 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग 11-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section ( ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध/अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्लीविशेष पुलिस स्थान के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण असम राज्य पर करती है ।
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 6 नवम्बर, 2007
[सं. 228/47/2007- एवीडी II ] चन्द्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS (Department of Personnel and Training) NewDelhi , the 6th November , 2007 का.आ. 3294,-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , असम राज्य सरकार, राजनीतिक( ए) विभाग , दीसपुर की अधिसूचना ज्ञापन सं. पीएलए-486/2007/51 -एदिनांक 29 अगस्त, 2007 द्वारा प्राप्त असम राज्य सरकार की सहमति से कमालपुर पुलिस स्टेशन जिला कामरूप में भारतीय दण्ड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम 45 ) की धारा 120 बी , 121 , 121 -ए, 122 , 307 , 353 , 385 और 511 सपठित धारा 25 ( 1 ) ( ए) और 27 , आयुध अधिनियम, 1959 ( 1959 का अधिनियम सं. 54 ) के साथ पठित आवश्यक वस्तु अधिनियम, 1955 ( 1955 के अधिनियम 10 ) की धारा 4 और विधि विरुद्ध क्रियाकलाप ( निवारण ) अधिनियम, 1967 को धारा 10 और 13 ( 1967 का अधिनियम सं. 37 ) काअधीन मामला सं. 163/2007 तथा एफ सी आई, पूर्वोत्तर क्षेत्र , गुवाहाटी , असम के कार्यपालक निदेशक डॉ. पी.सी. राम की मृत्यु के संबंध में इसी पुलिस थाने के यूडी मामला सं. 21/2007 , कोई अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों तथा इस मामले से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्न, दुष्प्रेरण और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से
S.O. 3294.-.In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section( 1 ) of the Section 5 read with section 6 of theDelhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act, No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the Consent of State Government of Assam, Political (A) Department Dispur vide Notification Memo No. PLA-486/2007/ 51 -A dated 29th August, 2007 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of State ofAssam for investigation ofthe offences registered at Kamalpur Police Station in the District of Kamrup vide Case No. 163/2007 under sections 120-B , 121 , 121 -A, 122, 307, 353, 385 and 511 ofthe Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) read with section 25(1)(A) and 27 Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) read 4506 GI/ 2007
(9391).
9392
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
with section 4 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Act No. 10 of 1955) and sections 10 and 13 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (Act No. 37 of 1967) and same Police Station'sU.D. Case No. 21/2007 relating to death ofDr P.C Ram the Executive Director, FCI , N.E Region , Guwahati , Assam and any other offence or offences , attempts , abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with above mentioned offences and any other offence/ offences committed in the course of same transaction arising out of same facts and simultaneously launching of criminal prosecution against the guilty persons.
[No. 228/47 /2007 -AVD-II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.
वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 16 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3295.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में, संलग्न अनुबंध में 'नम्नलिखित बैंकों/बीमा कम्पनियों के सूचीबद्ध शाखाओं/कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है।
क्रम सं. बैंक बीमा कम्पनी का नाम
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] स्टेट बैंक आफ पटियाला
( 1 ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, आंचलिक कार्यालय एस.सी.ओ -7 सैक्टर-5 , पंचकुला , हरियाणा
(2 ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , आंचलिक कार्यालय एस.सी.ओ. संख्या 99-107 , मध्य मार्ग, सैक्टर-8 सी चंडीगढ़ -160018 ( 3 ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , वासुपुजिया चैम्बर्ज , आश्रम रोड, अहमदाबाद ( गुजरात ) पिन कोड नं. 380014 शाखा कूटसंख्या-5345
(4) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय नजदीक टिम्बर हाऊस , कार्ट रोड, शिमला-171001
(5) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय नज़दीक साउली खड्ड, मण्डी ( हि. प्र. )
(6) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय 21 , विधान सभा मार्ग पहली मंजिल , लखनऊ -226001
( 7 ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , एस.सी.ओ. 9-10 , सैक्टर -25 , हुडा, पानीपत -132103
(8 ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , कोठी नं. 120 , सैक्टर-15ए, हिसार
-(9 ) स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय एस.सी.ओ. - 7 , सैक्टर-5 , पंचकुला
स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर , प्रधान कार्यालय जयपुर
कार्यालय जिसे राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अन्तर्गत राजपत्र में अधिसूचित करना है।
शाखाओं /कार्यालयों
कीसंख्या
09 1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला
2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर 13 3. आन्ध्रा बैंक
10 4. इलाहाबाद बैंक 98 5. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 63 6. इंडियन बैंक
17 7. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंदौर 31 8. सैंन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 39 9. स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद 53 10. ओरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स 85 11. सिंडीकेट बैंक
38 12. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर
01 13. बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र 38 14. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक 33 15. भारतीय साधारण बीमा निगम 01 16. भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम 43
19 17. ओरियंटल इंश्योरेंस कम्पनी लिमिटेड
591 कुल
[फा. सं. 11016/4/2007-हिन्दी] रमेशबाबू अणियेरी , संयुक्त निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) 1. आर.ए.एस.ई.सी.सी , बीकानेर रीटेल असेट स्माल एन्टरप्राइज क्रेडिट सेंटर, बिन्नाणी विल्डिंग , अलख सागर रोड, बीकानेर (राजस्थान)
2. करनाल , सेक्टर12 , पार्ट -1 , अरबन स्टेट , करनाल 3. पचेरी कलां , पचेरी कलां , जिला- झुंझुनू, राजस्थान 4. धनबाद , होटल वी.आई.पी , काम्प्लेक्स , बैंक मोड़ , धनबाद-828001
5. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , चण्डीगढ. , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , सेक्टर-डी, चण्डीगढ़ -160017
6. खन्ना , पुरेवाल टावर, समराला चौक , जी.टी. रोड , खन्ना-141401 , पंजाब
7. झांसी शाखा , 524 , सदर बाजार , झांसी , ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) 8. जोधपुर पार्क, कोलकाता , प्रथम तल , 71 , जोधपुर पार्क, कोलकाता-700068
9. कमला नगर , आगरा , जी -685 , कमला नगर , आगरा 10. अजय नगर , कोलकाता , 333 , अजय नगर , कोलकाता-700075
11. खुदरा आस्ति लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यमी प्रकोष्ठ , जोधपुर , खुदरा आस्ति लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यमी प्रकोष्ठ , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर , प्रथम तल , जालोरी गेट शाखा , जोधपुर-342001
12. रानी ( पाली ) , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, शाखा-रानी, जिला पाली
13. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , अजमेर , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ बीकानेर एण्ड जयपुर, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय पंचम्, प्लाट नं. 14 , अशोक बिहार कॉलोनी , वैशाली नगर , मेनरोड , शांतिपुर, अजमेर [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
आन्ध्रा बैंक
राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के नियम 10( 4 ) तहत अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं की सूची
1. आन्ध्रा बैंक, जयानगर शाखा सैदाबाद , हैदराबाद -500059 2. आन्ध्रा बैंक, जी-3 ए, राजलक्ष्मी अपार्टमेंट स्ट्रीट नं.-8, हब्सीगुडा, हैदराबाद -500007
3. आन्ध्रा बैंक, उप्पल बस डिपो के सामने पीर्जादिगुडा, हैदराबाद-500031
4. आन्ध्रा बैंक ई- सेवा के नजदीक, रामनगर , हैदराबाद-500020 5. आन्ध्रा बैंक , मार्थोंमा सेंटर शाखा , नेरेडमेट , विनायकनगर , हैदराबाद
6. आन्ध्रा बैंक , डायमंड प्वाइंट शाखा , सिख विलेज , सिकन्दराबाद -500009
7. आन्ध्रा बैंक , वेंकटापुरम शाखा, आलवाल , सिकन्दराबाद-500015
8. आन्ध्रा बैंक , मीरपेट शाखा सरूरनगर मंडल , रंगरोड्डी जिला, हैदराबाद-500079
9. आन्ध्रा बैंक , आनंदबाग शाखा , मल्काजगिरि, सिकन्दराबाद , हैदराबाद: -500047
10. आन्ध्रा बैंक एस. ए. आर. एम. शाखा, आन्ध्रा बैंक बिल्डिंग , कोठी , सुल्तान बाजार , हैदराबाद -500195
इलाहाबाद बैंक
प्रोफार्मा- II
क्र. सं. अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालय/शाखा का नाम व पता हिन्दी में
1. इलाहाबाद बैंक, ग्राम 163 - बी , नेहरू कालोनी , पो. हरिद्वार रोड, देहरादून ( उत्तरांचल )
2. इलाहाबाद बैंक , कोयल घाटी , अखंड आश्रम के निकट, हरिद्वार रोड, ऋषिकेष (उत्तरांचल)
3. इलाहाबाद बैंक , विष्णु मार्केट सिल्थम पिथौरागढ़ ( उत्तरांचल ) 4. इलाहाबाद बैंक , माल रोड, पौड़ी ( उत्तरांचल) 5. इलाहाबाद बैंक , रुद्रपुर रोड, रोडवेज बस स्टैंड के निकट किच्छा , उधम सिंह नगर ( उत्तरांचल )
6. इलाहाबाद बैंक , गोवर्धन विलास , उदयपुर शाखा, उदयपुर (राजस्थान)
7. इलाहाबाद बैंक , 11 ए, कुंभा मार्ग न्यू फतहपुरा, उदयपुर (राजस्थान)
8. इलाहाबाद बैंक, 361 , हिम्मत नगर गोपालपुरा सर्किल , टोंक रोड, जयपुर ( राजस्थान)
9. इलाहाबाद बैंक , उज्जवल निवास , बी- रोड, पावटा, जोधपुर (राजस्थान)
10. इलाहाबाद बैंक, 1/5 , राजस्थान हाउसिंग बोर्ड कॉलोनी , भिवाड़ी , जिला अलवर ( राजस्थान)
!
11. इलाहाबाद बैंक, भोपाल वाला आर्य एस. एस. स्कूल , श्रीगंगानगर (राजस्थान)
12. इलाहाबाद बैंक, पायली भटाली शाखा, ग्राम किटाली ( पद्मपुर ग्राम के पास ) , पोस्ट दुर्गापुर , जिला चन्द्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र)
9393
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
13. इलाहाबाद बैंक , वर्धमनेरी शाखा , बस स्थानक के समीप , जिला वर्धा ( महाराष्ट्र)
14.- इलाहाबाद बैंक , येलाकेली शाखा तालुका : सेलू, जिला वर्धा (महाराष्ट्र)
15. इलाहाबाद बैंक , रामनगर यावली शाखा , ग्राम व पोस्ट कोलाम्बी यावली, तालुका एवं जिला यवतमाल (महाराष्ट्र) 16. इलाहाबाद बैंक, अंधेरी ( पश्चिम ) , सं. 188 , राजेश सेंटर , एसवी रोड, अल्फा रेस्तरां के ऊपर , अंधेरी ( पश्चिम ) , मुम्बई-400069
17. इलाहाबाद बैंक , बांदरा ( पश्चिम ) , जैनुब विला , 187 , टर्नर रोड, बांदरा ( पश्चिम ) मुम्बई -400050
18. इलाहाबाद बैंक , घाटकोपर ( पूर्व ) , के. के. छाया बिल्डिंग , टी पी एस नं. 3 , पंत नगर , घाटकोपर ( पूर्व ) मुम्बई -400077 19. इलाहाबाद बैंक, गोरेगांव ( पश्चिम ) , किरण इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , एमजी रोड , गोरेगांव ( पश्चिम ) मुम्बई-400062 20. इलाहाबाद बैंक, कालबादेवी , 63/65 , मोरारजी कांजी बिल्डिंग , डॉ. आत्माराम मर्चेंट रोड, मुम्बई -400002
21. इलाहाबाद बैंक, परेल , डॉ. अम्बेडकर रोड, परेल , पो. ब. 6610, मुम्बई -400012
22. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सायन , हाउस नं. 1 - ए/ 1 एवं 1-1/2 , प्लाट-277 , न्यू सायन कोआपरेटिव हा. सो. सिंधी कॉलोनी गुरूकृपा होटल के सामने , सायन ( पश्चिम) , मुम्बई -400022 23. इलाहाबाद बैंक , वरली , मनीष कमर्शियल सेंटर , 215 ए, डॉ. एनी बेसेंट रोड वरली , मुम्बई -400030
24. इलाहाबाद बैंक, वाशी यूनिट नं. 2 , अरेंजा अर्केड, सेक्टर -17 , न्यूमुम्बई , जिला ठाणे -400703
25. इलाहाबाद बैंक, वसूली शाखा , सं. 188 , राजेश सेंटर , एसवी रोड, अल्फा रेस्तरां के ऊपर , अंधेरी ( पश्चिम ) , मुम्बई -400069
26. इलाहाबाद बैंक , फोर्ट, 37 , मुम्बई समाचार मार्ग , पो. बा. सं. 282 , फोर्ट, मुम्बई-400023
27. इलाहाबाद बैंक , अंतर्राष्ट्रीय शाखा , टी -4 , वर्ल्ड ट्रेड सेंटर , द्वितीय तल , कफ परेड, कोलाबा , मुम्बई -400005 28. इलाहाबाद बैंक, औद्योगिक वित्त शाखा , 3 , दिनशा वाच्छा रोड, मुम्बई -400020
29. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जुहू विले पार्ले प्लाट नं. ए-2 , मॉडल टाउन को . हा. सो. लि. पी . गजल , जुहू विल पार्ले डेवलपमेंट स्कीम, मुम्बई-400049
30. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सेवा शाखा , 37 , तीसरा तल , समाचार मार्ग , पो. बा. सं. 282 , फोर्ट- मुम्बई -400023
31. इलाहाबाद बैंक, त्वरित समाहरण सेवा , 37 , तीसरा तल , मुम्बई समाचार मार्ग , पो. बा. सं. 282 , फोर्ट , मुम्बई -400023 32. इलाहाबाद बैंक , ट्रजरी शाखा , 37 , तीसरा तल , मुम्बई समाचार मार्ग , पो. बा. सं. 282 , फोर्ट , मुम्बई -400023 33. इलाहाबाद बैंक , एनआईबीएम कोंढवा शाखा, सनश्री वूड्स कमर्शियल बिल्डिंग , एन आई बी एम रोड , कोंढवा, पुणे-411048
34. इलाहाबाद बैंक, मापुसा गोवा , होटल सत्य हीरा बिल्डिंग , हनुमान मंदिर के नजदीक, मापुसा गोवा-403507 9394
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007 / KARTIKA 26, 1929
35. इलाहाबाद बैंक , रानी दुर्गावती विश्वविद्यालय शाखा आरडीवीवी परिसर , पचपेड़ी दक्षिण सिविल लाइन , जबलपुर-482001 36. इलाहाबाद बैंक, अंतर्राष्ट्रीय शाखा मुरादाबाद, पुरी मार्केट कोर्ट रोड , जिला- मुरादाबाद ( उ.प्र. ) 244001
37. इलाहाबाद बैंक , पकड़िया नौगवां , मण्डी स्थल के नजदीक , ग्राम व पो. पकड़िया नौगवां, जिला पीलीभीत ( उ. प्र. ) 38. इलाहाबाद बैंक , न्यू आंगरा , सी-2/48 , ग्रिव्स कॉम्पलेक्स , कमला नगर ,आगरा ( उ.प्र. )
39. इलाहाबाद बैंक , अलीपुर भादर ग्रा व पो. प्रेम नगर , जिला फतहपुर ( उ. प्र. )
40. इलाहाबाद बैंक , मकनपुर महोई ग्राम व पो. ग्रहोई, जिला-फतहपुर (उ. प्र. )
41. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सैफई ग्राम व पो. सैफई , जिला- इटावा (उ. प्र. )
42. इलाहाबाद बैंक , तिर्वा, ग्राम व पो. तिर्वा , जिला कन्नौज (उ. प्र. )
43. इलाहाबाद बैंक , आगरा खण्डारी, पदम चन्द्र इंस्टीटयूट , खंडारी , आगरा ( उ. प्र. )
44. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सिटी माण्टेसरी स्कूल शाखा , विशाल खण्ड, गोमती नगर-2, लखनऊ-226010 (उ. प्र.)
45. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जानकीपुरम शाखा , आदर्श काम्पलेक्स , इंजीनियरिंग चौराहा , जानकीपुरम , लखनऊ ( उ. प्र. ) 46. इलाहाबाद बैंक , लालगंज शाखा , प्रथम तल , तेजगांव काम्पलेक्स , लालगंज, जिला रायबरेली (उ. प्र. ) 47. इलाहाबाद बैंक, महर्षि विद्या मंदिर, सीतापुर रोड, आईआईएम मोड़, लखनऊ-226020 ( उ. प्र.)
48. इलाहाबाद बैंक , एफ.डी. एस.ओ. , के.जी. डेंटल यूनिवर्सिटी, लखनऊ -226003 (उ. प्र.)
40. इलाहाबाद बैंक , मोहनगंज , रायबरेली रोड , मोहनगंज , तहसील- तिलाई जिला : रायबरेली ( उ. प्र. )
50. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सालोन , मोहल्ला पैंगम्बरपुर , पोस्ट सालोन , जिला रायबरेली ( उ. प्र. )
११. इलाहाबाद बैंक , ऊँचाहार , इलाहाबाद रोड, मेन मार्केट , ऊँचाहार , जिला रायबरेली ( उ. प्र. )
52. इलाहाबाद बैंक, जगदीशपुर , शांतिवन , जगदीशपुर , जिला सुल्तानपुर ( उ. प्र. )
53. इलाहाबाद बैंक , मुसाफिरखाना , पुराने स्वास्थ्य केन्द्र के सामने , वार्ड सं. 10 मुसाफिरखाना , जिला सुल्तानपुर (उ. प्र.)
54. इलाहाबाद बैंक , महाराजगंज , बछरावां रोड , महाराजगंज, जिला रायबरेली ( उ.प्र. )
5.5. इलाहाबाद बैंक, स्टाफ कॉलेज शाखा 21/483 , इंदिरा नगर , लखनऊ ( उ. प्र. )
56. इलाहाबाद बैंक, मंडलीय कार्यालय , कोर्ट रोड, देवघर, झारखण्ड-814112
57. इलाहाबाद बैंक , देवघर शाखा , न्यू सरवां रोड , देवघर , झारखण्ड-814112
58. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जामताड़ा न्यूटाउन , गांधी मैदान के निकट, जामताड़ा, झारखण्ड-815351
59. इलाहाबाद बैंक, डाल्टन गंज , गोपाल लाल अग्रवाल का मकान , आढ़त रोड, डाल्टनगंज , जिला पलामू राँची झारखंड 60. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सराईकेला वार्ड नं. 2 , हरिहर प्रसाद साहू का मकान , जिला सराईकेला , झारखण्ड-833219 61. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सिमडेगा मेन रोड , जिला सिमडेगा , झारखण्ड-835223
62. इलाहाबाद बैंक , ब्राम्बे केन्द्रीय प्रशिक्षण संस्थान , बाम्बे , जिला राँची , झारखण्ड
63. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सेंट एंडूज कोलेज शाखा, गोरखपुर (उ. प्र.)
64. इलाहाबाद बैंक, जे. एन. एन. पब्लिक स्कूल शाखा, गोरखनाथ , गोरखपुर ( उ. प्र.)
65. इलाहाबाद बैंक, बैरिया , पो. बैरिया , जिला बलिया ( उ. प्र. ) 66. इलाहाबाद बैंक, खोड़ा गणेश जी रोड , मदनगंज , किशनगढ़ , जिला अजमेर , राजस्थान
67. इलाहाबाद बैंक , गली नं. 1 , राजा पार्क, जयपुर , राजस्थान 68. इलाहाबाद बैंक , के. ई. सी. इंटरनेशनल लि. , झोटवाड़ा रोड, जयपुर राजस्थान
69. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सी-206 , रीको कॉलोनी , आबू रोड, जिला सरोही, राजस्थान
70. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जिला परिषद् शाखा , उरई, जिला जालौन (उ. प्र. )
71. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सेक्टर 34ए, एस. सी. ओ. 23-24-25 , जिला चंडीगढ़ , चंडीगढ़ , (केन्द्रशासित प्रदेश ) 160022 72. इलाहाबाद बैंक , फव्वारा चौक , पुराना बस स्टेंड, सिविल रोड , जिला-सोनीपत , हरियाणा-13101
73. इलाहाबाद बैंक , एससीएफ , 190 , ग्रीन स्कवायर मार्केट , जिला हिसार, हरियाणा-125001
74. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जी टी रोड, बस स्टैंड के सामने , पलवल , जिला फरीदाबाद , हरियाणा
75. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सेवा शाखा एससीओ 49-50 ( तृतीय तल ) , बैंक स्कवायर , सैक्टर 17 - बी, चंडीगढ़ , पिन 160017 76. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सिविल लाइन शाखा 22 , पी.डी. टण्डन मार्ग , इलाहाबाद , उत्तर प्रदेश
77. इलाहाबाद बैंक, वसूली शाखा , 22 , पी.डी. टण्डन मार्ग , इलाहाबाद , उत्तर प्रदेश
78. इलाहाबाद बैंक , चन्दौली शाखा , जी.टी. रोड, ग्राम व पोस्ट चन्दौली, उत्तर प्रदेश
79. इलाहाबाद बैंक, कचनार शाखा ( राजा तालाब ) जी. टी. रोड, राजा तालाब , जिला वाराणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश 80. इलाहाबाद बैंक , 'वाराणसी का.वि.पी. युनिवर्सिटी, महात्मा गांधी काशी विद्यापीठ कैम्पस , जिलाः वाराणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश 81. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सैदपुर शाखा , ग्राम व पोस्ट सैदपुर , जिलाः गाजीपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश
82. इलाहाबाद बैंक, सेवा शाखा वाराणसी, काशी विद्यापीठ रोड, सी/314-2, विद्यापीठ रोड, जिलाः वाराणसी, उत्तर प्रदेश [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
83. इलाहाबाद बैंक , देवगांव शाखा, वाराणसी-आजमगढ़ रोड़ जिला-वारणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश
84. इलाहाबाद बैंक, वाराणसी शिवपुरवा शाखा, मकान नं. डी-59/6एफ, रथयात्रा क्रॉसिंग महमूरगंज रोड, वाराणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश
85. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जियनपुर शाखा, ग्राम व पोस्ट जियनपुर, जिला- आजमगढ़ , उत्तर प्रदेश
86. इलाहाबाद बैंक , रवीन्द्रपुरी शाखा, बी-36/10 पी-जे. , मानस मंदिर के सामने लंका रोड , वाराणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश 87. इलाहाबाद बैंक , वाराणसी सं. सं. विश्वविद्यालय शाखा, संपूर्णानंद संस्कृत विश्वविद्यालय कैम्पस, जगतगंज , वाराणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश
88 , इलाहाबाद बैंक, वाराणसी यूपी कॉलेज कैम्पस शाखा , भोजूबीर, वाराणसी, उत्तरा प्रदेश
89. इलाहाबाद बैंक, रोहिणी शाखा, सेक्टर-14 , एक्सटेंशन, रोहिणी, दिल्ली-110085
90. इलाहाबाद बैंक, त्वरित संग्रहण सेवा शाखा , 17 , संसद मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110001 .
91. इलाहाबाद बैंक , औद्योगिक शाखा , 17 संसद मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110001
92. इलाहाबाद बैंक , न्यूराजेन्द्र नगर शाखा , नई दिल्ली -110060 93. इलाहाबाद बैंक , बी-3 , बुलबुल नेस्ट, अशोक निकेतन आनंद विहार , नई दिल्ली-110092
94. इलाहाबाद बैंक , सेवा शाखा 1 , सिंधिया हाउस , जनपथ नई दिल्ली -110001
95. इलाहाबाद बैंक , जनकपुरी शाखा, ए-3 /32 , जनकपुरी , नईदिल्ली
96. इलाहाबाद बैंक , 12 - सी , मीरा नगर, भीलवाड़ा रोड, चित्तौड़गढ़ 97. इलाहाबाद बैंक , त्रेहन भवन , रेलवे रोड, सीकर, राजस्थान 98. इलाहाबाद बैंक , पुगलिया भवन , खेड़ा रोड , बालोतरा जिला बाड़मेर , राजस्थान
यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
राजभाषा कार्यान्वयन प्रभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , मुम्बई
राजभाषा नियम 10 ( 4 ) में अधिसूचनार्थ संस्तुत शखाएं/ कार्यालय क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , दिल्ली
1. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सेक्टर 62 , नोएडा शाखा, सी -56 ए/28 , सेक्टर-62 , नोएडा-201307 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , चंडीगढ़
2. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सी. आर. कॉलेज ऑफ एजुकेशन शाखा, राजगढ़ रोड, हिस्सार, पिन 125001
3. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सेक्टर 32 , शाखा चंडीगढ , (यू.टी.)
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , जयपुर
4. यूनिधन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , झूनझूतु शाखा , हाउस नम्बर -डी-14 ( क) , इंदिरागनर , झूनझून-333001 5. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सुखाडिया सकल शाखा , हिंदुस्तान जिंक भवन , उदयपुर -313001
9395
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , रायपुर
6. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, अम्बिकापुर शाखा, देवीगंज रोड, पो. अम्बिकासपुर, जि. सरगुजा, छत्तीसगढ़-497001 7. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, चांपा शाखा , बरपाली चौक , स्टेशन रोड, पो. चांपा , जिला जांजगीर चांपा , छत्तीसगढ़-495671 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , जबलपुर
8. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, मदन महल शाखा , 1935 , गुलाटी पेट्रोल पम्प के सामने , मदन महल , नागपुर रोड , जबलपुर, मध्य प्रदेश , 482 002
9. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गोटेगांव शाखा , चौरसिया कॉम्प्लेक्स, मेन रोड, गोटेगांव , जिला नरसिंहपुर-487118 10. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सेवा शाखा , श्याम आर्केड, मालवीय चौक, जबलपुर ( म. प्र. ) 482001
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , लखनऊ
11. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , जानकीपुरम शाखा-1/सी , 1/343 , सेक्टर जी, जानकीपुरम, लखनऊ-226021
12. यूनियम बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, फैजाबाद रोड शाखा, फैजाबाद रोड, मटियारी चौराहा , चिनहट, लखनऊ -226016 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , कानपुर
13. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, बर्रा वर्ल्ड बैंक शाखा,जे-19 , एवं जे -19ए , बर्रा वर्ल्ड बैंक , कर्रही रोड, कानपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश-208027
14. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , यशोदा नगर शाखा , 81 , पशुपती नगर , यशोदा नगर , कानपुर , उत्तर प्रदेश-208011 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , मेरठ
15. यूनियमन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बुलंदशहर शाखा, राजा बाबू रोड, बुलंदशहर-203001 जिला बुलंदशहर ( उ. प्र. ) 16. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सौंख क्रासिंग मथुरा शाखा, सौंख क्रासिंग , मथुरा जिला : मथुरा (उ. प्र. ) 17. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रामपुर सिविल लाइन्स, जामिया तुस सालेहात , मौलाना शौकत अली रोड, सिविल लाइन्स, रामपुर-244901 (उ. प्र. )
18. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बिजनौर शाखा , कोठी अन्टाघर , 183. सिविल लाइन्स, बिजनौर जिला बिजनौर ( उ. प्र. ) 19. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , नगर निगम गाजियाबाद शाखा , नगर निगम, नवयुग मार्केट, गाजियाबाद -201001 (उ. प्र.) 20. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , राज नगर गाजियाबाद शाखा, सेंट पॉल अकेडमी, सेक्टर -9 , राजगनर , गाजियाबाद-201001 (उ.प्र.)
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , आजमगढ़
21. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बेलइसा शाखा , चाणक्य सिनेमा हाल के पास सर्जुद्दीनपुर , आजमगढ़ ( उ. प्र. ) पिन 276001 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , रांची
22. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , देवघर शाखा , इन्द्रलोक कॉमप्लेक्स, टॉवर चौक, स्टेशन रोड, देवघर -814001 जिला देवघर (झारखण्ड)
23. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , चाईबासा शाखा , न्यूजैन मार्केट , कोर्ट रोड, चाईबासा, पिन 833201 जिला चाईबासा , झारखण्ड 9396
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , बडौदा
24. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , वराछा रोड शाखा, शांताबा कॉम्प्लेक्स, वराछा रोड, सूरत-395006
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , अहमदाबाद .
25. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , ड्राइव इन रोड शाखा, शैली कॉम्प्लैक्स, सुरधारा सर्कल के पास , साल अस्पताल रोड, ऑफ ड्राइव इन रोड, अहमदाबाद-380054
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , ठाणे
26. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, घोडबंदर रोड , ठाणे ( प. ) शाखा गाला क्र. 7 से 11 , तल मंजिल , सॉलिटेयर टावर्स , घोडबंदर . रोड, चितलसर , मानपाडा, ठाणे ( पु. ) -400607 27. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , ऐरोली शाखा , ब्लैक स्मिथ टॉवर , तल मंजिल , प्लॉट क्र. 14 , सेक्टर 6 , ऐसेली , नवी मुम्बई-400708
28. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , वडखल शाखा पोस्ट वडखल , वडखल नाका, तर्तालुका पेन , जिला रायगढ़ -402107 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालाय , बेंगलूर
29. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एचएसआर लेआऊट शाखा 1003 , श्री राज राजेश्वरी निलया , 9 वां मेइन , वां सेक्टर, एचएसआर लेआऊट, बेंगलूर
30. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , आर टी नगर शाखा , 254/1 , बी एम पी 5वां क्रॉस , वसंतप्पा ब्लॉक , आर टी नगर , बेंगलूर-560032
31. यूनियमन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पीइएस स्कूल ऑफ इंजिनियरिंग शाखा , होसूर रोड , इलेक्ट्रानिक सिटी के नजदीक , बेंगलूर -560100
32. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , कर्वेपुनगर शाखा , 11 :, सीएसजी आर्केड , गगनचुंबी , डबल रोड , कुर्वेवुनगर , मैसूर पिन 570023
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , हैदराबाद
33. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मेहदीपट्णम शाखा , सय्यद प्लाजा, क्रिस्टल गार्डन के सामने , अत्तापूर रोड , भारूतीनगर , मेहदीपट्णम रिंग रोड, हैदराबाद -500008
34. यूनियमन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , कमलापुरी कोलनी शाखा प्लाट नं. 335 , फेज 3 , कमलापुरी कोलनी के निकट श्रीनगर कोलानी , हैदराबाद -500073
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , विजयवाड़ा
35. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सेवा शाखा 1 ली मंजिल , ऋषभ टॉवर्स, कॉन्वेंट स्ट्रीट, विजयवाड़ा-520001 , जिला कृष्णा (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)
36. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गुडिवाड़ा शाखा , तल मंजिल, 10-137 , गांधी पुतले के सामने , एलुरु रोड , गुडिवाड़ा-521301 , जिला कृष्णा ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) 37. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मछलीपट्टणम् शाखा तल मंजिल , 18/1 , आर. टी. सी. बस स्टैंड के सामने , इंग्लिशपालेम , मछलीपट्टणम्-521001 जिला कृष्णा (आन्ध्र प्रदेश)
38. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मदनपल्ली शाखा , तल मंजिल, नं.-15-6-05-02 आर. टी. सी. बस स्टैंड के सामने , मदनपल्ली -517325 , चित्तुर जिला ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश ) क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , विशाखापट्टणम्
39. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, गाजुवाका शाखा, डोर सं 7-5-59, आर. के. प्लाजा, चेट्टीवाणीपालेम , एनएच -5 , विद्युत सब स्टेशन के सामने , गाजुवाका 530026 पोस्ट व जिला विशाखापट्टणम
40. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मधुरवाड़ा शाखा , डोर सं. 6-111/6, श्री सुब्बालक्ष्मी कॉम्प्लेक्स, दुर्गा थियेटर के पास, चन्द्रमपालेम , एनएच-5 , मधुरवाड़ा-530041 पोस्ट व जिला विशाखापट्टणम
41. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , तुनि शाखा , डोर सं. 8-10-58 कन्यका परमेश्वरी मंदिर के सामने बेल्लापु दीथि, तुनि-533401 , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , विशाखापट्टणम
42. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , नरसीपट्टणम शाखा डोर सं. 34-125/ 1 , रामाराव पेटा, नरसीपट्टणम्-531116 जिला विशाखापट्टणम
43. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मंदापेटा शाखा, डोर सं. 34-16-7 , कामत आर्केड, मेन रोड, मंदापेटा -533308 , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला
44. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , अच्युतापुरम शाखा , डोर सं. 5-45, पुडिमाडका रोड , अच्युतापुरम -531011 , जिला विशाखापट्टणम
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , भुवनेश्वर
45. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बडबिल शाखा, स्टेशन रोड , बडबिल , जिला केऊझर , उड़ीसा , 758035
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , एर्णाकुलम
46. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, कलमशेरी शाखा , 4/465 -ए, अपोलो टायर्स लि. के सामने , नार्थ कलमश्शेरी-683104 , जिला एर्णाकुलम ( केरल )
47. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पूणितुरा शाखा, 29/2862 - ए , आदित्य , गांधी स्क्वेयर, पूणितुर-682317 , जिला एर्णाकुलम (केरल)
48. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मुलनतुरूती शाखा , करिक्कल इस्टेट , चोट्टानिक्करा रोड, मुलनतुरूति -682314 , जिला एर्णाकुलम ( केरल )
49. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , वाडानापल्ली शाखा, 7/491 , एल-पी , मिकास बिल्डिंग , वाडानापल्ली -680514 , जिला त्रिश्शूर ( केरल)
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , एर्णाकुलम
50. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , कुन्नमकुलम शाखा, क्रास व्यू बिल्डिंग, गूरुवायूर रोड, कुन्नमकुलम-680503 , जिला त्रिश्शूर (केरल)
51. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, तिरुर शाखा , 20/1042- ए, कुंडिनी कॉम्प्लेक्स, हॉस्पिटल रोड, तयेपालम , तिरुर-676101 , जिला मल्लपुरम ( केरल )
52. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,पेरिनगोट्टुकरा शाखा, 6/ 163-164, रामकृष्ण बिल्डिंग , पेरिनगोट्टुकरा -680565 जिला त्रिश्शूर (केरल) [ भाग 11 खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
53. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मुल्लश्शेरी शाखा , 8/266 , वलियकत बिल्डिंग , मुल्लश्शेरी-680509 जिला त्रिश्शूर (केरल)
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , तिरुवनंतपुरम
54. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , आटिंगल शखा , शाम्स काम्प्लेक्स, के.एस.आर.टी.सी. बस स्टैण्ड के सामने , आटिंगल जिला तिरुवनंतपुरम , केरल -695101 55. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, पट्टोम शाखा, केशवदासपुरम जंकशन, तिरुवनंतपुरम-695004 ( केरल)
56. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पेरुरकाडा शास्त्रा , अल मदोलिल आर. जे. टॉवर्स, पेरुरकाडा, विरुवनंतपुरम -695005 ( केरल) 57. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , कोल्लम सिविल स्टेशन शाखा , देवप्रिय कॉम्प्लेक्स, हाईस्कूल जंकशन , कोल्लम-695009 (केरल)
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , गुवाहाटी
58. यूनिययन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,आदाबरी शाखा , हबीबुररहमान शापिंग काम्प्लेक्स, प्रथम तल , आदाबरी मेन रोड, आदाबरी बसस्टेंड के सामने , गुवाहाटी-781014
59. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , हाथीगांव शाखा , मेन रोड , हाथी गांव चारियाली , हाथीगांव वेटापारा , वीआईपी रोड, डाकस्त्राना दिसपुर सचिवालय , जिला- कामरुप ( शहर ) गुवाहाटी-781038
60. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , दुलियाजन शाखा , स्टेशन रोड , डेली बाजार , डाक- दुलियाजन , जिला- डिब्रूगढ़ -786602 61. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एल एन बारी रोड शाख 13 थाना रोड, गनराज चौमुहानी डाक वेस्ट त्रिपुरा -799001 62. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , जी एस रोड शाखा , जुगल बाजारा , प्रथम तल गणेशपुरी चारियाली डाक-दिसपुर , गुवाहाटी , जिला- कामरूप ( शहर ) , गुवाहाटी-781006 63. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,हिजुगुडी शाखा अमर काम्प्लेक्स. प्रथम तल , ए.टी. रोड , हिजुगुडी , डाक-तिनसुखिया, पिन-786125
इंडियन बैंक
राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 (4 ) के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र में अधिसुचित किए जाने हेतु कार्यालयों/शाखाओं की सूची
1. इंडियन बैंक, मंडल कार्यालय , लिबर्टी प्लाजा चतुर्थ तल, हिमायतनगर , हैदराबाद-500029 , आंध्र प्रदेश 2. इंडियन बैंक , कूकटपल्ली : प्लाट नंबर 70 , फेस -1 , धमरिड्डी कॉलोनी , सामने; वचचद्ध जे. एन. टी. यू. कूकटपल्ली, हैदराबाद -500072, आंध्र प्रदेश , 3. इंडियन बैंक , गच्चीबावली प्लाट नंबर 12-16 , सर्वे नंबर 93 , साइबर अपार्टमेन्टस , गच्चीबावली , हैदराबाद -500008 , आंध्र प्रदेश
4. इंडियन बैंक , बंजारा हिल्स प्लैट, थ्संजद्ध नंबर 101 , लायोलामा केव्स, रोड नंबर 12 बंजारा हिल्स हैदराबाद -500045 , आंध्र प्रदेश
5. इंडियन बैंक , मूसापेट इनलैंड कंटेनर डिपो , गूड्सशेड रोड , मूसापेट, हैदराबाद -500018 , आंध्र प्रदेश
9397
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
6. इंडियन बैंक , कल्याणनगर डोर नंबर , 8-3-168 /एम/13 , श्रीरामनगर , कल्याणनगर , फेस-3 , यूसुफगुडा पोस्ट, हैदराबाद-500045 , आंध्र प्रदेश
7. इंडियन बैंक , बी-1/ 7 , अशोक विहार , फेस -2 , नई दिल्ली -110052
8. इंडियन बैंक सी -47 , प्रीत विहार, विकास मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110092
9. इंडियन बैंक , अग्रवाल तरुण प्लाजा , डीडीए शॉपिंग कॉम्प्लेक्स, तरुण प्लाजा , पीतम पुरा , दिल्ली-110034 10. इंडियन बैंक , जामिया मिलिया , इस्लामिया शाखा , मौलाना मोहम्मद अली जौहर मार्ग , जामिया नगर , नई दिल्ली-110025 11. इंडियन बैंक अग्रवाल मॉल , प्रथम तल , भूखण्ड संख्या -3 , सैक्टर -5 , आशीर्वाद चौक , द्वारका , नई दिल्ली-110075 12. इंडियन बैंक , आस्ति वसूली प्रबंधन शाखा ऊपरी भूतल वर्ल्ड ट्रेड सेंटर , बाबर रोड, नई दिल्ली-110001 13. इंडियन बैंक शो रूम सं. 4-5-7-8 , रहेजा भूतल , फ्रंट साइड आईएमटी मानेसर , गुड़गांव , हरियाणा-122050 14. इंडियन बैंक जी -3 , आरचिड स्क्वेयर , भूतल , सुशांत लोक गुड़गांव , हरियाणा-122002
15. इंडियन बैंक, 1491/31 , शिवाजी कालोनी चौक, रोहतक हरियाणा-124001
16. इंडियन बैंक, डीएवी कॉलेज , चंडीगढ़ रोड, होशियारपुर , पंजाब-146001
17. इंडियन बैंक , 56 ए/बी. गाधी नगर , जम्मू, जम्मू और कश्मीर -180004
स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इन्दौर
राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 (4 ) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित करने हेतु शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची :
मध्य प्रदेश
1. रिंग रोड, बाम्बे हास्पिटल शाखा कूट सं. 463 , प्लाट नं. 1 , पी.यू. 4 बाम्बे हास्पिटल के पास , रिंग रोड , इन्दौर -452010 2. पछोर शाखा , कूट सं. 465 , ए.बी. रोड, पछोर ( जिला राजगढ़ ) -465583
3. मंडलेश्वर शाखा, कूट सं. 466 , 2 , छप्पनदेव मार्ग , वार्ड नं. 14 , कसरावद रोड चौराहा , बस स्टेण्ड के पास , मंडलेश्वर -451221
4. होल्कर विज्ञान महाविद्यालय शाखा , कूट सं. 467 , होल्कर विज्ञान महाविद्यालय केम्पस , इन्दौर -452017
5. आई.ई.टी. शाखा , कूट सं. 470 , आई.ई.टी. खंडवा रोड , इन्दौर-452017
6. सिवनी मालवा शाखा , कूट सं. 474 , 131 सेठ पुसामल मार्ग , जैन श्वेताम्बर , मंदिर ट्रस्ट भवन वार्ड नं. 11 , सिवनी मालवा-461223
7. आवास वित्त शाखा, कूट सं. 441 , खेल प्रशाल , रेसकोर्स रोड, इन्दौर-452003
8. विशेषीकृत आस्ति वसूली प्रबंधन शाखा , कूट सं. 444 , 9, महारानी रोड, सियागंज , इंदौर -452007 9398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
9. मिड कारपोरेट कमर्शियल शाखा , कूट सं. 447 , 12, अग्रवालनगर , सपना संगीता रोड , इन्दौर -452001 10. सेवा शाखा , जबलपुर , कूट सं. 448 , सदर केन्ट, मेन रोड , जबलपुर-482001
11. सोनागिरी शाखा , कूट सं. 442 , एच-7 , सरला टावर, पिपलांनी , पेट्रोल पंप के सामने , भोपाल-462021 12. जावरा शुगर मिल शाखा , कूट सं. 446 , पेट्रोल पंप चौपाटी के पास , जावरा -457226
13. ए.बी. रोड शाखा , कूट सं. 450 , स्कीम नं. 54 , ए.बी. रोड, प्रेस काम्प्लेक्स के पास, इन्दौर-452010
14. उमरिया , कूट सं. 451 , गांधी चौक के पास , उमरिया -484661 16. डिंडोरी , कूट सं. 452 , मेन रोड , डिंडोरी -481880 16 , वैयक्तिक बैकिंग शाखा , जबलपुर , कूट सं. 454 , सदरकेंट मेन रोड , जबलपुर-482001
17. रोजन्द्र नगर शाखा, इन्दौर, कूट सं. 457 , 119 - बी , अभिमान प्लाजा, रोजन्द, नगर , इन्दौर -452012
18. अन्नपूर्णा रोड शाखा , इन्दौर , कूट सं. 458 , बैंक कॉलोनी, अन्नपूणां रोड , इन्दौर -452009
19. कुरवार शाखा , राजगढ़ , कूट सं. 459 , कुरवार मंडी , जिला राजगढ , ( ब्यावरा ) -465674
20. राऊ शाखा , कूट सं. 460 , शासकीय कन्या उच्चतर मा.वि. स्कूल के सामने , ए.बी. रोड, राऊ -453331
21. अरेरा हिल्स शाखा, भोपाल , कूट सं. 461 , प्लाट नं. 59 , न्यू नर्मदा भवन , ए- विंग प्रथम मंजिल अओरा हिल्स , भोपाल-462001
22. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , रतलाम , कूट सं. 471 , 2 , फ्रीगंज , दो बत्ती चौराहा , रतलाम -457001
23. केन्द्रीयकृत पेंशन प्रसंस्करण केन्द्र , इन्दौर, कूट सं. 472, 163 , घीया चेम्बर्स , कंचनबाग , इन्दौर-452001 24. लघु उपक्रम साख प्रकोष्ठ , इन्दौर , कूट सं. 475 , 22 , पलशीकर कॉलोनी , इन्दौर-452004
25. खुदरा आस्तियां एवं लघु उपक्रम साख प्रकोष्ठ , भोपाल , कूट सं. 476 , 1 , अरेरा हिल्स , भोपाल-462004 26. मुद्रा प्रबंधन प्रकोष्ठ , इन्दौर , कूट सं. 480 , स्कीम नं. 54, ए.वी. रोड, प्रेस काम्प्लेक्स के पास , इन्दौर -452010 27. खुदरा आस्तियां एवं लघु उपक्रम साख प्रकोष्ठ , इन्दौर , कूट सं. 478 , पहली मंजिल , कोठारी मार्केट , एम.जी. रोड , इन्दौर-452007
28. खुदरा आस्तियां एवं लघु उपक्रम साख प्रकोष्ठ, नई दिल्ली , कूट सं. 477 , 16/15 , डब्ल्यू. ई. ए. आर्यसमाज रोड, करोलबाग , नई दिल्ली-110005
छत्तीसगढ
29. मोतीबाग शाखा , रायपुर , राजस्थान , कूट सं. 443 , एफ ब्लाक, मार्डन काम्प्लेक्स , मोतीबाग , रायपुर -492001 30. उदयपुर, कूट सं. 449 , विनिमय काम्प्लेक्स , उदयपुर-313001 उत्तर प्रदेश
31. कलेक्टस्ट कंपस , आगरा , कूट सं. 464 , कलेक्टरेट कैंपस , आगरा. ( उ.प्र. ) - 282010
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
1. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , छतरपुर शाखा , 100 , जवाहर मार्ग , कानपुर , झांसी रोड, छतरपुरा , जिला छतरपुरा पिन-471001
2. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रसूलियां शाखा , एसपीएम गेट नं 1 , हरदा रोड , रसूलियां होशंगाबाद , म.प्र.
3. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, पिपरिया शाखा , किराना बाजार , पुरानी गाला मंडी, पिपरिया, म.प्र.
4. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, मोगीनंद शाखा , गांव एवं डाकखाना मोगीनंद , जिला सिरमौर , तहसील नॉहन -173030 5. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मंडी गुटकर शाखा, मेन रोड, एनएच -21 , जिला मंडी , तहसील सदर मंडी-175021 6. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, अर्बन इस्टेट शाखा , एससीएफ -45 , सेक्टर -7 , जिला करनाल , अर्बन इस्टेट करनाल-132001 7. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सुखपुरा चौक, सुखपुरा 63-66, वार्ड नं. 12 , जिला रोहतक
8. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , साहा शाखा , 71 - ए, नजदीक बस स्टैंड, शहजादपुर रोड, जिला अंबाला , साहा -133104 9. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , धर्मशाला शाखा , मेन बाजार , जिला धर्मशाला, पिन-176052
10. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , नरवाना शाखा , डीएसएस 15 , हुड्डा कमर्शियल , नजदीक रेलवे रोड , जिला जीन्द , नरीवाना-126116
11. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बहादुरगढ़ शाखा, वेश्य आर्य कन्या महाविद्यालय , नजदीक रेलवे स्टेशन , जिला झज्जर , बहादुरगढ़ -123307
12. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रोहतक शाखा, ऑल इंडिया जाट हीरोज मैमोरियल कॉलेज , दिल्ली रोड , रोहतक -124001 13. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, मनमाड शाखा, सुराना संकुल , शिवाजी चौक , मनमाड-423104
14. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , दिंडोरी शाखा, श्रीनिवास मार्केट , पुराना कलवण रोड , एसटी स्टेंड के पीछे , दिंडोरी , जि. नासिक
15. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गोपालगंज शाखा यादोपुर रोड, जिला गोपालगंज , पो. बा. गोपालगंज-841428 16. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , नरसिंहपुर रोड शाखा ( म. प्र ) , नरसिंहपुर रोड-480001 , जिला-छिंदवाड़ा
17. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, गोपालगंज शाखा गोपालगंज, सागर म.प्र . , सागर -470001
18. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , परसोरिया शाखा ग्राम व पोस्ट परसोरिया, जिला सागर , म.प्र. परसोरिया-470667 19. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बहरोल शाखा , ग्राम व पोस्ट बहरोल , जिला सागर , मध्य प्रदेश , बहरोल -470772 20. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सूखाखेड़ी शाखा , ग्राम व पोट सूखाखेड़ी , तहसील गडरवारा , जिला नरसिंहपुर , म. प्र. , सूखाखेड़ी-487785
21. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , प्रथम तल, एस्लेहाल , राजपुर रोड , देहरादून ( उत्तराखण्ड) -248001 [ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
22. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , के. के. डिग्री कॉलेज , इटावा , उत्तर प्रदेश
23. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम बरेली , उत्तर प्रदेश
24. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बिजनौर , बिजनौर , उत्तर प्रदेश 25. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , किरावली , आगरा , उत्तर प्रदेश 26. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, डी.ए.वी , कॉलेज , करनपुर, देहरादून ( उत्तराखण्ड ) -248001
27. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , जनता महाविद्यालय अजीतमल , अजीतमल , जिला- औरैया , उत्तर प्रदेश
28. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सिविल लाइन , रामपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश
29. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एल. आर. पी . जी. कालेज गाजियाबाद उत्तर प्रदेश
30. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , नौरंगाबाद , जी.टी.रोड नौरंगाबाद , अलीगढ़, उत्तर प्रदेश
31. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , डी. बी. एस कॉलेज , करनपुर , देहरादून ( उत्तराखण्ड) -248001
32. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एन. टी. पी. सी. जिला- औरिया , उत्तर प्रदेश
33. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , खीरी , लखीमपुर खीरी , उत्तर प्रदेश
34. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , क्षेत्रीय श्रीगांधी आश्रम , अलीगढ़ , उत्तर प्रदेश
35. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , कैम्ब्रियन हाल , देहरादून (उत्तराखण्ड) -248001
36. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , नगर निगम बरेली , बरेली , उत्तर प्रदेश
37. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , शाहजंहापुर , शाहजंहापुर , उत्तर प्रदेश
38. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गोवर्धन डीग अड्डा, मथुरा , उत्तर प्रदेश
39. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , आंचलिक कार्यालय 33 , सेन्ट्रल बैंक बिल्डिंग , नेताजी सुभाष रोड , कोलकाता -700001 स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैद्राबाद
राजभाषा नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचना के लिए पात्र शाखाओं की सूची
1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , आलमपुर शखा , ( कूट सं. 189 ) महबूबनगर जिला पिन : 509153
2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, बालानगर शाखा , ( कूट सं. 442) ; महबूबनगर जिला, पिन -509202
3. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , आरमूर शाखा , ( कूल सं. 110 ) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन-503224
4. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , रामकोट शाखा ( कूट नं. 350 ) , हैद्राबाद पिन -500001
5. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , रामनगर शाखा , ( कूट सं. 471 ) हैद्राबाद , पिन-500020
4506 G1/07-2
9399
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
6. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , सैदाबाद शाखा , ( कूट सं. 345 ) , हैदराबाद, पिन -500059
7. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , सचिवालय शाखा , ( कूट सं. 77) , हैदराबाद , पिन-500022
8. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , पंजागुट्टा शाखा ( कूट सं. 72 ) , हैदराबाद पिन-500082
9. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , सुल्तान बाज़ार शाखा , ( कूट सं. 62) , हैदराबाद , पिन -500195
10. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , सिटी शाखा ( कूट सं. 73 ) हैदराबाद, पिन-500002
11. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , मोगलपुरा शाखा , ( कूट सं. 596) , हैदराबाद , पिन-500001
12. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, एनआरआई शाखा, ( कूट सं.. 740 ) , हैदराबाद. पिन -500029
13. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , नल्लाकुंटा शाखा ( कूट सं. 83 ) , हैदराबाद, पिन -500044
14. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , नामपल्ली स्टेशन रोड शाखा, (कूट सं. 79 ) , हैदराबाद , पिन -500001
15. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, मलकपेट शाखा ( कूट सं. 61 ) , हैदराबाद, पिन -500024
16. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , महबूबगंज शाखा , ( कूट सं. 69 ) हैदराबाद , पिन-500012
17. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , जानपहाड शाखा, ( कूट सं. 686) , नलगोंडा जिला , पिन-508218
18. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , जडचर्ला शाखा ( कूट सं. 921 ) , महबूबनगर जिला , पिन-509301
19. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , इंदिरानगर शाखा , ( कूट सं. 835 ) , कामारेड्डी निजामाबाद जिला, पिन-503111 20. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , एमएसआर नगर शाखा, ( कूट सं. 871) , कर्नूल , कर्जूल जिला , पिन -518001 21. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , लघु उद्योग व्यवसाय शाखा ( कूट सं. 932) , मिर्यालगुडा, नलगोंडा जिला , पिन -508207 22. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , मैत्री वुमेन्स कॉलेज शाखा ( कूट सं. 952) , नलगोंडा, नलगोंडा जिला , पिन -508001 23. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , प्रकाशम् बाजार शाखा , ( कूट सं. 819 ) , नलगोडा, नलगोंडा जिला , पिन-508001 24. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, देवरकद्रा शाखा ( कूट सं. 257 ) , महबूबनगर जिला , पिन-509204
25. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , नंदयाले शाखा , ( कूट सं. 677 ) , कर्नूल जिला पिन -518501
26. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , प्रगति भवन कॉप्लेक्स, ( कूट सं. 961) , निजामाबाद , पिन -503001
27. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , निज़ामसागर शाखा , (कूट सं. 552) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन-503002
28. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , पंगल शाखा , ( कूट सं. 444 ) , महबूबनगर जिला, पिन-509112
29. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , राजमपेट शाखा, ( कूट सं. 503 ) निजामाबाद जिला, पिन -503101 9400
[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
30. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , रैतुनगर ( मिर्जापुर ) शाखा , ( कूट सं. 559 ) , निज़ामाबाद जिला , पिन-503301
31. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , तिरुपति ( मुख्य ) शाखा ( कूट सं. 328 ) , तिरुपति, पिन -517501
32. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , तोर्लीकोंडा शाखा ( कूट सं. 562) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन-503175
33. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , हनवाडा शाखा , ( कूट सं. 608 ) , महबूबनगर जिला, पिन-509334
34. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, हुस्नाबाद शाखा, ( कूट सं. 618 ) , महबूबनगर जिला , पिन-509350
35. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , कृषि विकास शाखा, ( कूट सं. 481) , नलगोंडा, जिला , पिन -508201
36. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, चिटयाल शाखा ( कूट सं. 567 ) , नलगोंडा जिला , पिन-504306
37. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, चीवेमुला शाखा ( कूट सं. 643 ) , नलगोंडाजिला , पिन -508213
38. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , चंडूर शाखा , ( कूट सं. 368 ) , निज़ामाबाद जिला , पिन-503206
39. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , बोमरासपेट शाखा , ( कूट सं. 405) , महबूबनगर जिला , पिन-509338
40. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, बेधावोल शाखा, ( कूट सं. 563 ) , नलगोंडाजिला , पिन--508204
41. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , डोन्कल शाखा , (कूट सं. 522 ) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन-503311
42. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , जकलैर शाखा , ( कूट सं. 676) , महबूबनगर जिला, पिन -509353
43. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , कोल्लापुर शाखा, (कूट सं. 195 ) , महबूबनगर , जिला पिन--509102
44. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, खुदावनपुर शाखा, ( कूट सं. 550 ) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन -503212
45. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , कोत्ताकोटा शाखा ( कूट सं. 690 ) , महबूबनगर जिला , पिन -509381
!
46. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , पीवीएन कॉलोनी शाखा ( कूट सं. 856 ) , महबूबनगर, महबूबनगर जिला , पिन -509001 47. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद नवाबपेट शाखा ( कूटः सं 381 ) महबूबनगर जिला पिन -509340
48. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पालेम शाखा , ( कूट सं. 738 ) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन-503225
49. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , पोतंगल शाखा , ( कूट सं. 747) , निजामाबाद जिला , पिन-503219
50. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , पुलिचर्ला शाखा, ( कूट सं. 622 ) , नलगोंडा जिला, पिन -508266
51. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , तिरुपति मुख्य शाखा, पी.एम. आर. काम्प्लेक्स , नए म्युनिसिपल कार्यालय के सामने , तिरुपति-517501
52. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , आदिनाथ कामर्शियल कॉम्प्लेक्स शॉप नं. 1 , 2 , पुणे सातारा रोड, बिब्वेवाडी, पुणे -41-1037 53. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, ए-64 , गोकुलधाम , गोरेगांव पूर्व मुम्बई-400053
ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉर्मस
राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के तहत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र में अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं की सूची
अहमदाबाद क्षेत्र
1. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, प्लॉट नं. - 159/2/ 1 , होटल कृष्णा होटल नटराज के सामने , नरोली रोड, सिलवासा, दादर नगर हवेली , पिन-396230
2. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , न्यू योर्क प्लाजा , जजीस बंग्लोके सामने बोड़कदेव , अहमदाबाद , पिन-380015 3. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , जी -2 , समेधा , ऐसोसिएटेड पेट्रोल पंप के सामने सी.जी. रोड, अहमदाबाद , पिन-380006 4. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , पहली मंजिल मणिभद्र कॉम्प्लेक्स, राजस्थान अस्पताल के सामने कैम्प रोड , शाही बाग , अहमदाबाद , पिन -380004
5. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, एपीएम शॉपिंग मॉल , देवप्रिया बंग्लोस के पास 100 फुट सेटेलाइट रोड, अहमदाबाद , पिन-380051
6. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , निर्माण , ज्योति प्लाजा के पास , श्यामल क्रॉस रोड, सेटेलाइट, वेजलपुर , अहमदाबाद , पिन-380051
7. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , केंद्रीय विद्यालय , 13 , गांधार टावर, ओएनजीसी टाऊनशिप , अंकलेश्वर, पिन-393010 8. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , विस्तार पटल , बी/7/ 7/ 1 , भूतल , शाश्वत अस्पताल , कोठी पोल , रावपुरा , बड़ौदा, पिन--390001
9. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , विस्तार पटल , ई.एम.ई. कैंटीन , फतेह गंज , बड़ौदा, पिन -390008
10. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , शॉप नं. 54 से 58 , पहला ताला , रंग कॉम्प्लेक्स, झाडेश्वर रोड, भरूच
11. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , पहला माला , सरदार पटेल व्यापार संकुल , माल गोदाम रोड, मेहसाणा , पिन-384002 12. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , पटेल हाऊस , नारणपुर , भुज, जिला-कच्छ, पिन-370429
13. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , पहली मंजिल , कृष्णा पैलेस , पंचवटी मेन रोड, राजकोट , पिन-360001
14. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , यूजी । ए से । सी , एम्पायर स्टेट बिल्डिंग , रिंग रोड, सूरत , पिन-395002
15. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , एल-4 , आभूषण कॉम्प्लेक्स, घुड़दौड़ रोड , सूरत , पिन-395007
गुड़गांव क्षेत्र
16. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , एस. सी. ओ. -69 , हुडा मार्किट, सेक्टर -15 , फरीदाबाद , पिन-121002 17. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , एस. सी. एफ-46 , पार्ट-11 , मार्किट , सेक्टर-19 , फरीदाबाद, पिन-121002 18. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, जीवा पब्लिक स्कूल , सेक्टर-21 बी , फरीदाबाद , पिन -121002 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
19. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , 763/25 , बसई रोड , गुड़गांव , पिन-122 001
20. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, टैगोर इंटरनेशनल स्कूल, डीएलएफ- III , गुड़गांव , पिन-122001
21. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , फवारा चौक , गुड़गांव , पिन-122001
22. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , राव राम सिंह स्कूल , ग्राम व डाकघर कन्हाई, गुड़गांव , पिन -122 001
23. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , वाणिज्य निकुंज कॉम्प्लैस, एच.एस.आई.डी.सी. , उद्योग विहार , फेज-4, गुड़गांव , पिन-- 122 001
24. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , रोटरी पब्लिक स्कूल , सेक्टर-22 , गुड़गांव , पिन-122 001
25. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , एस.सी.ओ. - 14 , हुडा मार्किट , सेक्टर-15 , पार्ट 2 , गुड़गांव , पिन -122001
26. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, एस.सी.एफ. - 62 , हुडा मार्किट , सेक्टर-17 ए, गुड़गांव , पिन-122 001
27. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , प्लॉट नं. 5 , सेक्टर-32 , इंस्टीट्यूशनल एरिया गुड़गांव , पिन-122001
28. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , अंसल इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ टेक्नोलोजी, सेक्टर-55 , गुड़गांव , पिन-122001 29. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , ऑर्चिड स्क्वेयर , बी- ब्लॉक , सुशांतलोक-1 , गुड़गांव , पिन -122 001
30. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, चिरंजी भारती स्कूल, सी-ब्लॉक, सुशांतंलोक-1 , गुडगांव , पिन-122 001 31. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , होली चाइल्ड स्कूल , रिवाड़ी, पिन--23401
32. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, चंद्रावती सीनियर सेकेंडरी स्कूल, ताऊडू, ( जिला मेवात) , पिन-122 105 33. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , लेखनसामग्री गोदाम , नीलम चौक , एन.आई.टी. , फरीदाबाद, पिन -121 102 रोहतक क्षेत्र
34. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, मेन बाजार , जुलाना, जिला: जींद, पिन -126 101
35. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , सेक्टर -95 , पुलिस लाइन एरिया, दिल्ली रोड, हिसार , पिन -125 001
36. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , गुरुद्वारा रोड़ , सोनीपत , पिन-131 001
37. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , गांव सरसा 'घोगरा , डाकखाना बमला , तहसील एवं जिला भिवानी , पिन-124 001 33. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, सी. आर जेड. स्कूल , सोनीपत, जिला: सोनीपत , पिनः 131001
30. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , विद्या देवी जिंदल स्कूल , हिसार , जिलाः हिसार, पिनः 125 001
400. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , चौ. देवी लाल मेमोरियल ट्रस्ट बरनाला, जिलाः सिरसा , पिनः 125 055 41. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, राजकीय महाविद्यालय , हिसार, जिला: हिसार, पिनः 125 001
9401
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
42. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , गेटवे एजुकेशन एंड चैरिटेबल सोसाइटी, ग्रामः फजीलपुर, जिलाः सोनीपत
43. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , भाई खेमचंद एस.डी. कन्या विद्यालय , गुरुद्वारा पी. डी. , जिलाः सोनीपत , पिनः 131001 44. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , सेक्टर -13 , हुडा कॉम्पलैक्स हिसार, जिलाः हिसार, पिनः 125 001
45. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, एच.यू.डी.ए. कार्यालय , सेक्टर -1 , अर्बन एस्टेट, रोहतक , पिनः 124 001 46. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, ग्राम एवं डाकघर किशनगढ़ , तहसील-मेहम, जिलाः रोहतक, पिनः 124 112 47. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , बी.डी.पी.ओ. कॉम्पलैक्स, खरखोदा रोड, सांपला , जिलाः रोहतक
48. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , मेमोरियल अस्पताल , मामू भांजा चौक , जिलाः सोनीपत , जिलाः 131 001 49. ओस्थिन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, मिशन चौक , रोहतक रोड , जिला:सोनीपत , पिनः 131 001
50. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , 31 , माइल स्टीन , चौपड़ा फिलिंग स्टेशन , कुंडली, जिला: सोनीपत, पिनः 131 001 बरेली क्षेत्र
51. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , गुरु दर्शन बिल्डिंग , कचेहरी रोड, लखीमपुर खीरी , पिनः 246731
52. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , अलीपुर चौक, चौपुला, दिल्ली रोड, गजरौला, पिः 244 235
53. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , डा. जाकिर हुसैन रोड, धामपुर, जिलाः बिजनौर
54. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , नंदा लाईन्स , रामनगर , जिलाः नैनीताल , उत्तरांचल
55. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , ग्राम मटकोटा , ( सिडकुल ) , पो.आ. पंतनगर , जिलाः यू.एस. नगर, उत्तरांचल 36. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , सी -18 बी, दीनदयाल पुरम्, बरेली, पिनः 243 122
श्रीगंगानगर
57. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , 5 - डी-7 ( हुडको ) , जयनारायण व्यास नगर , बीकानेर , पिनः 334 003 58. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , केसर विला , अलख सागर रोड, मॉडर्न मार्किट, बीकानेर, पिनः 334 001 59. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , कोठारी मैडिकल एंड रिसर्च सेंटर , गजनेर रोड, बीकानेर , पिन: 334 004
60. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , इंजीनियरिंग कॉलेज , पूगल रोड, बीकानेर , पिनः 334 004
61. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , मेन बस स्टैंड के पास , चौहिलावाली , वायाः पीलीबंगा , जिलाः हनुमानगढ़ , पिन: 335 803
62. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, श्रीगंगानगर जिला दुग्ध उत्पादक सहकारी संघ लि. , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, हनुमानगढ़ जंक्शन, पिन: 335 512
63. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, कृषि उपज मंडी समिति , नई धान मंडी, हनुमानगढ़ जंक्शन , पिनः 335 512 9402
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
सिंडिकेट बैंक
राजभाषा प्रभाग
64. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , सेठों का बाजार, मेन मार्किट, लक्ष्मणगढ़ , जिलाः सीकर, पिनः 332 311
प्रधान कार्यालय : मणिपाल
: 65. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , न्यू धान मंडी, रवला मंडी, तहसील: घड़साना , जिलाः श्रीगंगानगर, पिनः 335 707
1. सिंडिकेट बैंक, अरेरा कालोनी शाखा , जी-3 /360 , गुलमोहर, ई-8 , अरेरा कॉलोनी , भोपाल , जिला भोपाल , मध्य प्रदेश , पिन: 462039
66. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , नेशनल हाईवे , बीकानेर रोड , नोखा जिलाः बीकानेर , पिनः 334 801
करनाल
2. सिंडिकेट बैंक, हेशंगाबाद रोड शाखा , शिखरवार्ता कॉम्प्लेक्स, होशंगाबाद रोड, भोपाल , जिला भोपाल , मध्य प्रदेश राज्य पिन: 462 011
67. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमसें, आई.ए.एस.ई. (डीम्ड यूनिवर्सिटी) गांधी विद्या मंदिर , सरदारशहर, जिलाः चूरू, पिन: 331 403
3. सिंडिकेट बैंक , मानवता नगर शाखा , कोलंबिया कॉनवेंट स्कूल , बिचाली- हप्सी रोड, इन्दौर , जिला इन्दौर, राज्य: मध्य प्रदेश , पिनः 452 016
68. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, नगर परिषद्, कचेहरी रोड, श्रीगंगानगर , पिनः 335 001
69. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , 39-40 , पी-ब्लॉक, श्रीगंगानगर , जिलाः श्रीगंगानगर , पिनः 335 001
आगरा
4. सिंडिकेट बैंक, जबलपुर सदर कैंटोनमेंट शाखा, सेंट एलोसियस कॉलेज परिसर क्षेत्र , पेंटी नाका , जबलपुर, जिला जबलपुर , राज्य : मध्य प्रदेश , पिन-482 001
70. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , सी.एल.जैन. डिग्री कालेज के सामने इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , आगरा रोड, फिरोजाबाद
5. सिंडिकेट बैंक, ग्वालियर सिटी सेंटर शाखा , जीवन प्रकाश बिल्डिंग , सिटी सेन्टर , एलआइसी ऑफ इंडिया , म. का. ग्वालियर , जिला : ग्वालियर , मध्य प्रदेश राज्य, पिन कोड-474 011
71. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, बी.एस.ए. कालेज ऑफ इंजीनियरिंग एंड टेकनोलॉजी , भूते श्वर रोड, मथुरा, पिन: 281 001
6. सिंडिकेट बैंक , सेंट एग्नीश कॉलेज शाखा , बेंदूर , मंगलूर , जिला : दक्षिण कन्नड , कर्नाटक राज्य, पिन-575002 72. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , के.डी. डेन्टल कालेज , एन.एच. 2 , आगरा दिल्ली रोड , मथुरा , पिनः 281 006
भोपाल
7. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बज्पे एयरपोर्ट शाखा , बज्पे , जिला : दक्षिण कन्नड, कर्नाटक राज्य, पिन-574 142
73. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , ई-7/ 5 , अरेरा कालोनी , भोपाल पिन: 462 016
8. सिंडिकेट बैंक, नव मंगलूर पत्तन न्यास शाखा पणम्बूर, जिला: दक्षिण कन्नड , कर्नाटक राज्य, पिन : 575 010
9. सिंडिकेट बैंक, चिकमंगलूर एस टी जे कॉलेज कैंपस , शाखा , बेंलूर रोड, जिला: चिकमगलूर, कर्नाटक राज्य, पिन: 577 101 74. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , श्री गुरु नानक बालिका उच्चतर माध्यमिक स्कूल , प्रेम नगर, मदन महल , जबलपुर , पिनः 482 002
10. सिंडिकेट बैंक, विजया कॉलेज शाखा , मूल्की, जिला : दक्षिण कन्नड, कर्नाटक राज्य , पिन-574154 75. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , ए.एस.सीनियर सेकेंडरी स्कूल आर्य समाज चौक, अम्बाला शहर , पिनः 133 001
11. सिंडिकेट बैंक,एसडीएम नेत्र अस्पताल शाखा, लालबाग, मंगलूर , जिला : दक्षिण कन्नड, कर्नाटक राज्य पिन-575 003 76. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , इंदर भान ( एल ) भरतरी एजुकेशनल सोसाइटी, जी.टी.रोड, पानीपत , पिनः 132 103
12. सिंडिकेट बैंक , के वी जी प्रालिटेक्निक शाखा , सुल्या, जिला: दक्षिण कन्नड, कर्नाटक राज्य , पिन 574 239 77: ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , कुरुक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय (जिलाः कुरुक्षेत्र) पिनः 136 119
78. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , लाल मैटरनिटी एंड जनरल हॉस्पिटल , आई.टी.आई. रोड, यमुनानगर, पिनः 135 001
13. सिंडिकेट बैंक, फादर मुल्लार्स चैरिटेबुल संस्था शाखा , हॉस्पिटल बिल्डिंग, कंकनाड़ी, मंगलपुर, जिला दक्षिण कन्नड, कर्नाटक राज्य, पिन: 575 002
79. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , नजदीक अनाज मंडी, अम्बाला- हिसार रोड , इस्माइलाबाद , ( जिलाः कुरुक्षेत्र )
14. सिंडिकेट बैंक, श्री महाबीर कॉलेज शाखा , मूडबिद्री , पोस्ट कोडंगल्लू, जिला : दक्षिण कन्नड तालुक कार्कल, राज्यः कर्नाटक, पिन-574 197
80. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , एच.एच.डी.सी. बिल्डिंग , जी.टी. रोड, ग्राम एवं डाकघरः उमरी , जिलाः कुरुक्षेत्र
81. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , एस.सी.ओ. नं. 23-24, सेक्टर-12 अर्बन एसटेट करनाल , पिनः 132 001
15. सिंडिकेट बैंक ,एबीएसएमआई डेंटल कॉलेज कैंपस शाखा, बेल्माग्राम, नित्यानंदनगर , देर्लकट्टे , जिला दक्षिण कन्नड़ , राज्य: कर्नाटक , पिन -575018
82. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, बरसत रोड, ग्राम एवं डाकघरः नूरवाला
83. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , 3 , प्रेम नगर , अम्बाला शहर
16. सिंडिकेट बैंक , पुत्तूर कैम्पको चाकलैट फैक्ट्री शाखा , केम्मिन्जे, दर्बे , पुत्तूर , जिला दक्षिण कन्नड़ , राज्य : कर्नाटक , पिन : 574 202
84. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , ग्राम एवं डाकघरः महलांवाली , जिलाः यमुनानगर
17. सिंडिकेट बैंक, मंगलूर अत्तावर के एम सी कैंप , शाखा , कस्तूरबा मेडिकल कॉलेज कैंपस, अत्तावर , मंगलूर, जिला : दक्षिण कन्नड़ , राज्यः कर्नाटक , पिन-575001 85. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , ग्राम एवं डाकघरः काला आम्ब, तहसील: नारायणगढ़ , जिला - अम्बाला [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
18. सिंडिकेट बैंक , बालूगंज शाखा , रौट जॉर्ज कॉलेज कैम्पस , गार्डन रोड , बालूगंज , आगरा , पिनः 282001 , (उ. प्र. ) 19. 'संडिकेट बैंक , छीपीटोला शाखा , रतन सागर , नं. 4 , धौलपुर हाऊस , छीपीटोला क्रासिंग , आगरा , पिनः 282001 (उ. प्र. )
20. सिंडिकेट बैंक , बाराद्वारी शाखा , श्री उदय सिंह जैन कॉलेज कैम्पस , अलीगढ़ , पिन-202001 , (उ. प्र. )
21. सिंडिकेट बैंक , रामघाट रोड शाखा , अलीगढ़ डेवलपमेंट अॅथॉरिटी कैम्पस , अलीगढ़ , पिन -202002
22. सिंडिकेट बैंक, जिला पंचायत शाखा, जिला पंचायत बिल्डिंग , कलेक्ट्रेट कम्पाउंड , अलीगढ़ , पिन-202001 , (उ.प्र. ) 23. सिंडिकेट बैंक ,वी सी लॉज शाखा , अलीगढ़ मुस्लिम युनिवर्सिटी कैम्पस , अलीगढ़, पिन-202002 , (उ.प्र. )
24. सिंडिकेट बैंक, बृन्दावन रोड शाखा , मैथोडिस्ट हॉस्पिटल , जयसिंहपुरा , बृन्दावन रोड, मथुरा , पिनः 281003 , (उ. प्र. ) 25. सिंडिकेट बैंक, छिबरामऊ शाखा , 12/ 73 बी, प्रथम तल , नगर पालिका रोड, छिबरामऊ , पिन -209721 , जिलाः कन्नौज , (उ. प्र. )
26. सिंडिकेट बैंक , बेलेकेरी शाखा , कृष्णा निवास , पहली मंजिल , मेन रोड , बेलेकेरी , जिला उत्तर कन्नड़ , राज्य : कर्नाटक, पिन : 581321
27. सिंडिकेट बैंक , सी एम सी सिरसी शास्त्रा , सिटी म्युनिसिपल काउंसिल , म्युनिसिपलं काम्प्लेक्स, मार्केट रोड, सिरसी , जिला : उत्तर कन्नड़ , राज्य कर्नाटक , पिन :581401 28. सिंडिकेट बैंक तट्टट्टीहल्ली एल.सी. 11 , शाखा , ट्रेपांग लोजेलिंग मोनास्ट्री , लामा कैम्प II , पो तिबेतियन कॉलोनी , तालुक : मुंडगोड, जिला उत्तर कन्नड राज्य : कर्नाटक , पिन-581411
29. सिंडिकेट बैंक , तट्टहिल्ली एल. सी. 1. शाखा , गार्डन लाची मोनास्ट्री लामा कैम्प -1 , ए. ओ. तिबतियन कॉलोनी तालुक : मुंडगोड , जिला उत्तर कन्नड़ , राज्य कर्नाटक , पिन-581411
30. लिंडिकेट बैंक, सीडीएम सैनिकपुरी शाखा , सैनिकपुरी , सिकंदराबाद , जिला रंगारेड्डी, राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश , पिन-500094
31. सिंडिकेट बैंक, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , 6-3-653 , पॉयनियर हाउस , सोनाजीमुडा, हैदराबाद , राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश , पिन -500082 32. सिंडिकेट बैंक, वसवी इंजीनियरिंग कॉलेज शाखा , 9-5-81 , इब्राहिमबाग , हैदराबाद, राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश , पिन -500031 33. सिंडिकेट बैंक , देवनहल्ली शाखा , नं. 117 , डीबी क्रास जंक्शन , बी बी रोड , एन एच 7 , देवनहल्ली , बेंगलूर ग्रामीण जिला-562110 , कर्नाटक राज्य
34. सिंडिकेट बैंक , केम्पापुरा शाखा , नं. 7 , केम्पापुरा मेन रोड , अस्ट्राजेनिका के पीछे बेंगलूर -560024
35. सिंडिकेट बैंक, चिकपेट शाखा, नं. 682 , पथि मैंन्शन , पो. बॉ. नं. 7843 , चिकपेट, बेंगलूर -560053 , कर्नाटक 36. सिंडिकेट बैंक , संजयनगर शाखा , नं. 158 , एईसीएस लेआउट , संजयनगर मेन रोड , संजय नगर , बेंगलूर -560094 , कर्नाटक
9403
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/ कार्तिक 26 , 1929
37. सिंडिकेट बैंक , नैशनल गैम्स् विलेज शाखा , बी-1-20 , शरावती ब्लाक, नैशनल गेम्स विलेज , कोरमंगला , बेंगलूर -560047 कर्नाटक
38. सिंडिकेट बैंक , मोतीलाल नेहरू वार्ड पैलेस रोड शाखा , जगदलपुर , जिला : बस्तर , छत्तीसगढ़ , पिन-494001 स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर
1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर, आंचलिक कार्यालय , पी. बी. सं. -25 , मनियाट्टुकुडी अफसा विल्डिंग मावूर रोड , कोषिक्कोड़, केरल -673004
बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र
(के. का. लोकमंगल , 1501 , शिवाजीनगर, पुणे -411005 ) "क" क्षेत्र
1. पालम विहार शाखा, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, चिरंजीव भारती स्कूल कंपाउंड, एफ ब्लॉक, पालम विहार, गुड़गांव -122017 , (हरियाणा)
2. यमुनानगर शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, जगधारी रोड, लाल द्वार के पास , यमुनानगर-135001 ( हरियाणा) 3. हरिद्वार शाखा, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, 42 , विवेक विहार , हरिद्वार-249407 , ( उत्तरांचल)
4. वसंत कुंज दिल्ली शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, तल मंजिल , ओईएस भवन , प्लॉट नं. 11 , एलएससी , सेक्टर , बी -1 , वसंत कुंज, नई दिल्ली-110070
5. श्री शंकराचार्य कॉलेज ऑफ इंजीनियरिंग शाखा,बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, श्री शंकराचार्य कॉलेज , ऑफ इंजीनियरिंग एंड टैक्नॉलॉजी कैम्पस , भिालाई , जि. युर्ग-490020 (छत्तीस गढ)
6. फिरोजाबाद शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, 31 , मोनापुरम, गणेश नगर , सी.एल. जैन डिग्री कॉलेज के सामने , फिरोजाबाद-283203 ( उत्तरांचल )
7. देवरी रोड आगरा शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , 27 , डिफेन्स एस्टेट , फेज -1 , देवरी रोड , आगरा-282001 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) 8. ईस्ट कचहरी रोड मेरठ शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, ईस्ट कचहरी रोड, एनएएस , कॉलेज , मेरठ-250001 ( उत्तरांचल ) 9. उज्जैन चैरिटेबल ट्रस्ट हॉस्पिटल रिसर्च सेंटर शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , यू जे सी टी एण्ड हॉस्पिटल रिसर्च सेंटर , अंकपट मार्ग , बुधवारिया , उज्जैन -456006 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) 10. इंदिरापुरम गाजियाबाद शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, प्लॉट नं. 1/3 , वैभव खण्ड , ब्लॉक डी आम्रपाली ग्रीन अपार्टमेंट्स, इंदिरापुरम , गाजियाबाद-201010 , ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) 11. पलवल शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, ओम भाटिया कं, ओल्ड ट्रक यूनियन के सामने, हरियाणा एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज के पास , रेलवे रोड, पलवल -121102 , ( हरियाणा ) 12. सेक्टर 62 - नोएडा शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , प्लॉट नं. सी-54-40 , सेक्टर -62 , जिला गौतम बुद्ध नगर , नोएडा-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश )
13. सेक्टर 24- रोहिणी दिल्ली शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, प्रथम मंजिल , बिंग मेगा गाल , सी एस ओसीएक नं. 7 , सैक्टर 24 , रोहिणी, नई दिल्ली -110085
14. राजौरी गार्ड दिल्ली शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, तल मंजिल , जे -8/77 , जी , नेहरू मार्केट , राजौरी गार्डन , नई दिल्ली-110027 9404
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
15. भीलवाड़ा शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, प्रथम तल , 8 - एल -1 , आर सी . व्यास कालोनी , भीलवाड़ा,-311001 , ( राजस्थान ) 16. सैक्टर-40, गुड़गांव शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, एस.सी. ओ. - 86, डिस्ट्रिक्ट शॉपिंग सेंटर , सैक्टर -56 , गुड़गांव 122001 (हरियाणा)
17. वैशालीगनर जयपुर शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, तल मंजिल , हॉट नं. 3 , प्रतापनगर , खाटीपुरा रोड, वैशालीगनर , जयपुर-302012 , ( राजस्थान)
8. बासवाड़ा शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, अभिनन्दनकॉम्प्लैक्स, दाहौड रोड, बांसवाड़ा-327001 , ( राजस्थान )
19. पीतमपुरा शाखा, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, तल मंजिल , के.पी. 27 , कम्युनिटी सेंटर, पीतमपुरा , नई दिल्ली-110043 20. मयूर विहार फेज- III , दिल्ली शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, प्रथम तल , एफ -28 से एफ -30 , हॉल क्र. 4 , सीएससी- II , कोंडाली धरोली , मयूर विहार , फेज -3 , नई दिल्ली -110096 21. धनबाद शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, तल मंजिल , मेन रोड, सावाईढेला , धनबाद-826001 (झारखंड)
"ख" क्षेत्र
22. गुरदासपुर शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, पोस्ट ऑफिस चौक के निकट, जेल रोड , गुरुदासपुर-143251 , ( पंजाब ) 33. वारजे पुणे शाखा, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, पलाई व्यूरेसिडेन्सी, शाप नं. 1-6 , सर्वे नं. 129 , हिस्सा नं. 9-10 , वारजे , पुणे-411025 (महाराष्ट्र)
34. पुणे यूनिवर्सिटी कैम्पस शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , मुख्य भवन के पास , प्रशासनिक खण्ड , पुणे यूनिवर्सिटी कैम्पस , पुणे-411005 (महाराष्ट्र)
35. पुणे परिमंडल कार्यालय , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , एफ.सी. रोड, शिवाजीनगर, पुणे 411005 , ( महाराष्ट्र) 36. नागपुर परिमण्डल कार्यालय , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, महाबैंक भवन , अभ्यंकर मार्ग , सीताबर्डी, नागपुर-40012 ( महाराष्ट्र) 37. रामकृष्ण मठ पुणे शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, 131 / 1 ए, विट्ठलवाडी रोड , दांडेकर पुल के पास , पुणे-411030 , (महाराष्ट्र)
38. यशवंतनगर नागपुर शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , धरपमेठ आर्ट्स एण्ड साइंस कॉलेज , धरमपेठ, नागपुर ( महाराष्ट्र) पंजाब नेशनल बैंक
अंचल कार्यालय , रीजेंट हाउस , दि नाल शिमला ( राजभाषा-कक्ष ) अनुलग्नक
1. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय बाई पास सोलन , जिला सोलन , हिमाचल प्रदेश , पिनकोड -173212 अनुलग्नक 'क'
23. पठानकोट शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, एस सी एफ नं. 7 , ब्लॉक बी , इंप्रूवमेंट ट्रस्ट कॉम्प्लेक्स , पटेल चौक , पठानकोट -145001 ( पंजाब )
24. रूपारेल कॉलेज कैम्पस , मुंबई शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, रूपारेल कॉलेज कैम्पस , बाल गोविन्ददास मार्ग , माटुंगा ( पिश्चम ), मुम्बई-400016 (महाराष्ट्र)
25. विदर्भ इरिगेशन डेवलपमेंट कार्पोरेशन , नागपुर शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, वीआईसीडी, सिचन सेवा भवन , सिविल लाईीन्स, नागपुर -440001 , ( महाराष्ट्र)
26. एनएमएमटी तुर्भे शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , नवी मुम्बई म्युनिसिपल ट्रान्सपोर्ट बस डिपो , सेक्टर 23 , तुर्भे , नवी मुम्बई-400075 (महाराष्ट्र)
27. टाउन सेंटर औरंगाबाद शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, टाउन सेंटर , औरंगाबाद-431003 , ( महाराष्ट्र)
28. मॉडर्न कॉलेज पुणे शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , मॉडर्न कॉलेज रोड, फायनल प्लॉट नं. 875/सी टीएस नं. 1186/ए, शिवाजीनगर, पुणे-411005 (महाराष्ट्र)
29. संत गाडगेबाबा उमरावती यूनिवर्सिटी शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, संत गाडगेबाबा अमरावती यूनिवर्सिटी मअमरावती-444620 , ( महाराष्ट्र)
30. गणपतिपुळे शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, तपस्वी, सदानंद निवास , मकान नं. 100 ( 1 ) , सर्वे नं. 33 ए-1 ए , गणपतिपुळे -416402 , जि. रत्नागिरी ( महाराष्ट्र) 31. विमाननगर पुणे शाखा , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र , शॉप नं. । व 2, ललवानी रेसिडेन्सी , सर्वे नं. 33 , हिस्सा क्र. 1 , विमाननगर, पुत्र-411014 (महाराष्ट्र)
32. बाणेर पुणे शाखा, बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र, शोरूम नं. 2, कपिल क्लासिक , तल मंजिल , सर्वे नं. 288/1 ए/ 1 , बाणेर, पुणे -411008 , (महाराष्ट्र)
2. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय टी सी.वी.डल , जिला: कांगड़ा, ( हिमाचल प्रदेश ) , पिन-176216 , दूरभाषा : 01892-221214
पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, एकीकृत अंचल कार्यालय 10-अशोक मार्ग , लखनऊ नई खुली शाखाओं/कार्यालयों को राजभाषा नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिसूचित कराना
3. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक शाखा जायस ( 4495 ) , पोस्ट जायस , जिला-रायबरेली (उ. प्र. ) i
4. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, शाखा तिमोई ( 4505 ) , पोस्ट तिलोई , जिला-रायबरेली ( उ. प्र. )
5. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय, मुख्य बाजार , पिंजौर , जिला पंचकुला ( हरियाणा)
6. पंजाब नैशलन बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , माडर्न हाउसिंग कॉम्प्लैक्स, मनीमाजरा , चण्डीगढ
राजभाषा नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिसूचित कराने हेतु पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , त्रिवेन्द्रम ( केरल ) के अधीन आने वाले कार्यालयों/शाखाओं की सूची 7. कुम्बानाड़ जिला पत्तनमत्तिट्टा, पिन -689547 8. टैम्पल शॉपिंग कम्प्लैक्स , ओचिरा ( कोल्लम ) -690526 9. त्रिचूर- पैलेस रोड, केरल -680020
10. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , गांधीनगर पुर रोड , भीलवाड़ा , (राजस्थान ) पिन-311001
नियम 10 ( 4) में अधिसूचित करने हेतु शाखाओं का सम्पूर्ण पता 11. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय प्रथम मंजिल , सुपर प्लाजा , संदेश प्रैस रोड , बोडकदेव , अहमदाबाद-380015 [भाग 11 खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
9405
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
12. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , ग्राउन्ड फ्लोर , सर्जन टावर, जनता नगर के सामने , 100 फीट रिंगरोड, चांदखेड , अहमदाबाद -382424
13. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय , प्रथम मंजिल , जयलक्ष्मी बिल्डिंग , उधना मेन रोड , सूरत-395210
14. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , जलसेवा भवन , सेक्टर, 10-३, गाधीनगर-382010
15. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , 255 , कल्पना सोसायटी , श्रीरंग विद्यालय के सामने , वाघोडिया रोड, वडोदरा -390019 16. पंजाच नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , सिटी लाइट्स कॉम्प्लैक्स, डूमस रोड, सूरत -395007
17. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शााखा कार्यालय , नरनारायण भवन , नवावास , माधापर ( कच्छ) -370020
18. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , आर के नगर, वीराणी चौक, राजकोट-360001
19. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, शाजा कार्यालय , एम.एल.बी. मेडिकल कॉलेज , झांसी, विशिष्ट संख्या-4602 , कानपुर रोड , झांसी ( उत्क्तर प्रदेश ) , पिन -284128 (फोन नं. 0510-2320780 ) राजभाषा नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र में अधिसूचनार्थ
2. पजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , डी. एन. कॉलेज , हिसार -125001 , जिला हिंसार ( हरियाणा )
21. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय , नगर पालिकर परिसर , हिसार -125001 , जिला हिसार ( हरियाणा )
2.2. पजाब नैशनल बैंक , शााखा कार्यालय , गुरू जम्भेश्वर विश्वविद्यालय , दि 125001 , जिला हिसार , ( हरियाणा) 21. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , क्षत्रीय समाशोधन केन्द्र , हिसार-125001 , जिला हिसार ( हरियाणा)
24.. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , रानियां-125076 , जिला सिरसा , ( हरियाणा)
25. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , बरनाला रोड, सिरसा -125055 , जिला हिसार (करिष्णणा )
26. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कायर्यालय , एम.एम. कॉलेज, फतेहाबाद -125050 , जिला फतेहाबाद ( हरियाणा ) 27. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय , एस. डी. भाडर्न स्कूल , पानीपत, जिला पानीपत (हरियाणा )
28. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , बीएमआईटी , सोनीपत, जिला सोनीपत ( हरियाणा )
29. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , हैदराबादी अस्पताल , पानीपत, जिला पानीपत ( हरियाणा)
30. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय मतलौडा , जिला सोनीपत (हरियाणा)
31. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , सी. एम. कॉलेज कैम्पस , किलाघाट , दरभंगा पिन-846004
32 पंजाब नैशनल बैंक, मारवाड़ी कॉलेज कैम्पस , गंगासागर , दरभंगा पिनः 846004
पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , दरभगा क्षेत्र , दरभंगा
33. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , राजेन्द्र कृषि विश्वविद्यालय , पूसा, जिला-एमस्तीपुर, पिन -848101
भारतीय साधारण बीमा निगम
इनमें से हिंदी
क्र. कार्यालय का कार्यालय में
कार्यालय
जानने
कितनों
स. नाम एवं पता कुल
अधिकारियों को हिंदी वाले
का कार्य कर्म-
कर्मचारियों
कंप्यूटरों की की कुल की संख्या साधक
कार्यालय देवनागरी में हिंदी टाइपराइटरों टंककों कुल सख्या संख्या
चारियों
ज्ञान प्राप्त का
है
प्रतिशत
4
3
5
6
7 1 2
4/6
4/6
04
100%
01. भारतीय
शून्य साधारण
कंप्यूटरों
पर देवनागरी बीमानिगम,
5, संसद मार्ग ,
मेंकार्य करने जीवन तारा
कीसुविधा
उपलब्ध है। बिल्डिंग,
नई दिल्ली-1
भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम राजभाषा कार्यान्वयन विभाग केन्द्रीय कार्यालय मुम्बई अधिसूचित किए जाने हेतु शेष क्षेत्रीय/मणका कार्यालयों के नामों की सूची पूर्वी क्षेत्र
1. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , कोलकाता
2. मं. का. आसनसोल
3. मं. का. ब्रह्मपुर
4. मं. का. बोगईगांव
5. मं. का. कोलकाता महानगर-1
6. मं. का. कोलकाता महानगर-2
7. मं. का. कोलकाता उपनगर
8. मं. का. कटक
9.. मं. का. गुवाहाटी
10. मं. का. हावड़ा
11. मं. का. जलपाईगुडी
12. मं. का. जोरहाट
13. मं. का. सम्बलपुर
14. मं. का. सिलचर
दक्षिण-मध्य क्षेत्र
15. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , हैदराबाद
16. मं. का. बेंगलूर -1
17. मं. का. बेंगलूर -2
18. मं. का. बेलगांव
19. मं. का. हैदराबाद
20. मं. का. करीमनगर
21. मं. का. मछलीपट्टणम
22. मं. का. मैसूर
23. मं. का. नेल्लूर
24. मं. का. राजमुन्द्री
25. मं. का. रायचूर
26. मं. का. सिकन्दराबाद
27. म. का. उहुषि
28. मं. का. त्रिशाखापट्टणम्
29. मं. का. वारंगल 9406
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
दक्षिण क्षेत्र
30. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , चेन्नई
31. नका. चन्नई-1
32. भ. का. चेन्नई-2
35. भो का, बेल्लूर
३८. २. का. भेलम
35. . ३. कायम्बतूर
20. में का. मदुराई
११. में. का. तजावर
34.भं. का. तिरुनेलवेली
19. पं. का.कोझीकोड
40. नं. का एर्नाकुलम
45. पं का कोट्टायम
42 में. का.. तिरुवनंतपुरम
उत्तर क्षेत्र
43 ५. का.. श्रीनगर
ओरियंटल इंश्योरेंस कम्पनी लिमिटेड
राजभाषा नियम, 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत कार्यालयों को अधिसूचित करवाने संबंधी सूची
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय चण्डीगढ़ व उसके अधीनस्थ कार्यालय 1. डायरेक्टर अभिकर्ता शाखा चण्डीगढ़
* शाखा कार्यालय 3 अमृतसर
3. शाखा कार्यालय 3 जालंधर
4. मण्डल कार्यालय 3 अमृतसर
मुम्बई क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय -2 व उसके अधीनस्थ कार्यालय 5. क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय क्र. 2 , मुम्बई
मण्डल कार्यालय क्र. 8 , मुम्बई
7. अभ्डल कार्यालय क्र. 20 , मुम्बई
१६ सण्डल कार्यालय कल्याण , मुम्बई
२. मण्डल कार्यालय बोरिवली , मुम्बई
10. शाखा कार्यालय क्र. 2 , मुम्बई
१। शाल्ट्रा कार्यालय डायमंड, मुम्बई
12 २शक्षा कार्यालय माहिम , मुम्बई
3 आश्वा कार्यालय जोगेश्वरी , मुम्बई
14. अर्यालय ठाणे , मुम्बई
15. परखा कायालय बेलापुर , मुम्बई
16. नं. का 21
र्यालय 23
18. मंडन काथालय-नोएडा
19. माल कार्यालय पोश्वम बिहार
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 16th October, 2007
S.O. 3295.-In pursuance of sub-rule (4) ofrule 10 of the Official Language ( Use of official purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government, hereby, notifies the listed branches/offices of the following Banks/Insurance Companies in the attached annexure , more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
Sl . Name of the Bank/Insurance Number of Branches /Offices No. Company
09 1. State Bank of Patiala
13 2. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur
10 3. Andhra Bank
98 4. Allahabad Bank
63 5. Union Bank of India
17 6. Indian Bank
31 7. State Bank of Indore
39 8. Central Bank of India
53 9. State Bank of Hyderabad
85 10. Oriental Bank of Commerce
38 11. Syndicate Bank
01 12. State Bank of Travancore
38 13. Bank of Maharashtra
33 14. Punjab National Barık
01 15. General Insurance Corporation of India
43 16. Life Insurance Corporation of India
19 17. Oriental Insurance Company. Limited
Total
591
[फा. सं. 11016/4/2007-Hindi ] REMESHBABU ANIYERY, Jt. Director (OL) STATE BANK OF PATIALA
1. State Bank Of Patiala
Zonal Office SCO - 7 Sector- 5 , Punchkula, Hrayana
2. State Bank Of Patiala
Zonal Office S.C.O. No. 99-107 Madhya Marg, Sector 8 -C, Chandigarh 160009
State Bank OfPatiala
3. Regional Office Near Timber House Cart Road Shimla- 171001
4. State Bank Of Patiala Regional Office Sauli Khadd Mandi (H.P .)- 175001
5. State Bank Of Patiala Regional Office 21 , Vidhan Sabha Marg Ist Floor Lucknow -226001
6. State Bank Of Patiala
Regional Office SCO . 9-10 Sector - 25 Huda Panipat- 132103 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
7. State Bank of Patiala, Regional Office Kothi No. 120, Sector 15A , Hissar.
3. State Bank of Patiala, Regional Office , SCO- 7 Sector -5, Punchkula .
9. State Bank of Patiala, Vasupujya Chambers , Ashram Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), Pin Code No. 380014 Branch Code No. 5345 .
STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR, HEAD OFFICE , JAIPUR
Office to be notified in the Official Gazette under Rule 10 (4) of Official Language Rules , 1976.
R.A.S.E.C.C. , BIKANER
Addresss:
1. Retial Assest Small Enterprise Credit Centre , Binani Building, Alakh Sagar Road, Bikaner.
KARNAIL
2. Sector 12 , Part - 1 , Urban Estate, Kartial .
PACHERI KALAN
3. Pacheri Kalan Distt . - Jhunjhunu .
DHANBAD
4. Hotel V.I.P. Complex, Bank Road , Dhanbad- 828001
REGIONAL OFFICE, CHANDIGARH
5. Regional Office , Sector-D, Chandigarh - 160017.
KHANNA
6. Purewal Tower , Samrala Chowk, G.T. Road , Khanna- 141401 , Punjab .
JHANSHI
7. 524, Sadar Bazar , Jhanshi ( U.P. ) JODHPUR PARK, KOLKATA
8. First Storey, 71 , Jodhpur Park, Kolkata- 700068.
KAMALA NAGAR, AGRA
9. G- 685 , Karnala Nagar, Agra AJAYA NAGAR, KOLKATA
10. 333 , Ajay Nagar, Kolkata-700075
RASECC , JODHPUR
11. RASECC , State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur , 1st Floor, Jalori Gate Branch, Jodhpur-342001.
RANI (PALI)
12. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur , Rani , District-Pali .
REGIONAL OFFICE, AJMER
13. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Regional Office -V, Plot No. 14, Ashok Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar , Main Road , Shantipur, Ajmer .
4506 GIA07-3
9407
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
ANDHRA BANK
List ofBranches to be notified under rule 10(4) ofOfficial LanguageRules , 1976
1. Andhra Bank Jayanagar Branch , Saidabad, Hyderabad- 500059.
2. Andhra Bank, G-3 , Rajalakshmi Apartment , Street No 8, Habsiguda , Hyderabad-500007..
3. Andhra Bank, Opposite Uppal Bus Depot , Peerjadiguda Hyderabad-500 031.
4. Andhra Bank, Near E -Seva, Ramnagar, Hyderabad -500 020.
5. Andhra Bank, Marthoma Centre Branch , Neredmet, Vinayaknagar , Hyderabad
6. Andhra Bank, Diamond Point Branch Sikh Village Secunderabad-500009.
7. Andhra Bank Venkatapuram Branch , Alwal , Secunderabad-500015.
6 8. Andhra Bank, Meerpet Branch, Saroornagar Mandal , Ranga Reddy District , Hyderabad-500 079.
9. Andhra Bank , Anandbagh Branch , Malkajgiri Secunderabad , Hyderabad -500 047 .
10. Andhra Bank, S.A.R.M. Branch, Andhra Bank Building, Koti , Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad-500195. ALLAHABAD BANK PROFORMA -II
Sl . No. Name and Address
1. Allahabad Bank, Vill, 163 -B , Nehru Colony, P.O. Haridwar Road, Dehradun( Uttaranchal) .
2. Allahabad Bank,
KoelGhati , Near Akhand Ashram, Haridwar Road , Rishikesh (Uttaranchal )
3. Allahabad Bank, Vishnu Market, Siltham Pithauragarh , (Uttaranchal).
4. Allahabad Bank , Mall Road, Pauri ( Uttaranchal) .
5. Allahabad Bank . Rudrapur Road, Near Roadways Bus Stand Kichha, U.S. Nagar ( Uttaranchal).
6. Allahabad Bank
Govardhan Vilas , Udaipur Branch , Udaipur (Rajasthan) .
7. Allahabad Bank,
11A, Kumbha Marg , New Phatehpura, Udaipur (Rajasthan)
8. Allahabad Bank
361, HimmatNagar , Gopalpura Circle , Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
9. Allahabad Bank, Ujjwas Niwas, B-Road, Paota, Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
10. Allahabad Bank,
1/5, Rajasthan Housing Board Colony , Bhiwadi Distt . Alwar (Rajasthan) .
11. Allahabad Bank
Bhopalwala Arya S.S. School , Sriganganagar , (Rajasthan) .
9408
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
12. Allahabad Bank
Paili Bhatali Branch , P.O. Durgapur,
i Block & Distt . Chandrapur , (Maharashtra) .
13. Allahabad Bank, Wardhamaneri Branch , Near Bus Stand , Distt . Wardha , (Maharashtra ) .
14. Allahabad Bank, Yelakeli Branch, Taluka Seloo , Distt . Wardh , (Maharashtra) .
15. Allahabad Bank Ramnagar , Yawali Branch , Yawali Taluk& Distt. Yawatmal , (Maharashtra) .
16: Allahabad Bank, Andheri (West) No. 188 Rajesh Centre , S. V. Road, Above Alfa Restaurant, Andheri (W). Mumbai-400069.
17. Allahabad Bank Bandra (West), Zainuh Villa, 187, Turner Road , Bandra (W), Mumbai-400050.
18. Allahabad Bank,
Ghatkopar (East) , K.K. Chhaya Building, TPS No. 3 , Pant Nagar, Goatkopar (E) , Mumbai-400077 .
19. Allahabad Bank ,
Goregaon (West), Kiran Industrial Estate, M. G. Road, Goregaon ( W) Mumbai-400062 .
20.Allahabad Bank, Kalbadevi , 63/65, Morarji Kanji Building , ... Dr. Atmaram Merchant Road, Mumbai -400002 .
21. Allahabad Bank, Parel , Dr. Ambedkar Road , P.B. 6610 , Mumbai -400012.
22. Allahabad Bank , Sion , House No. 1 - A/ 1 & 1 -A/2 , Plot No. 277, New Sion, Cooperatbve Housing Society, Sindhi Colony, OppGrukrupa Hotel ,Slon ( W); Mumbai-400022.
23. Allahabad Bank Worli ,Manish Commercial Centre, 216, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli , Mumbai-400022 .
24. Allahabad Bank , Unit No ? Arenja Arcade , Sector- 17, New Mumbai , Distt . Thane -400703 .
25. Allahabad Bank, Recovery Branch , No. 188 Rajesh Centre , S. V. Road , Above Alfa Restaurant. Andheri (W) . Mumbai-400069.
26. Allahabad Bank, Fort, 37, Mumbai Samachar Marg, P.B. No. 282 , Fort, Mumbai -400023.
27. Allahabad Bank, national Branch , T-4 , World Trade Centre ,. 2nd floor , Cuffe Parade , Colaba , Mumbai -400005:
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] 28. Allahabad Bank, Industrial Finance Branch sl 3, Dinshaw Vaechha Road, Mumbai-400020 29. Allahabad Bank ,
Juhu Ville Parle, Plot No. A-2, Model Town Co- op.Hsg. Society, PO: Ghazal Juhu , Vile Parle Dev. Scheme, Mumbai -400049.
30. Allahabad Bank , Service Branch, 37, Mumbai Samachar Marg P.B. No. 282, Fort, Mumbai -400023 .
31. Allahabad Bank ,
Quick Collection Service , 37, Mumbai Samachar Marg, P.B. No. 282 , Fort, Mumbai -400023 .
32. Allahabad Bank , Treasury, 37, Mumbai Samachar Marg, P.B. No. 282, Fort , Mumbai -400023 .
33. Allahabad Bank,
NIBM Kondhwa Branch , Sunshree Woods CommercialBldg. NIBMNIBM Road Kondhwa Khurd , Pune-411048 знаме пове
34. Allahabad Bank, Mapuca Goa Hotel , Satya Heera Building, NearHanuman Temple, Mapuca Goa , ond Distt.NorthGoa, Goa-403507.
35. Allahabad Bank , Rani Durgawati Vishvidyalaya Branch RDVV Premises , Pachpedi South Civil Line I Distt. Jabalpur , Pin 482001 .
36. Allahabad Bank , International Branch, Puri Market, Court Road, Distt. Moradabad ( U.P. )- 244001 .
37. Allahabad Bank , Pakadia Naugswan , Near Mandi Asthal P.O, & Vill Pakadia, Naugawan , Distt . Pilibhit ( UP)
38. Allahabad Bank , New Agra, C -2/ 48, Grives Complex , Kamla Nagar , Agra(UP).
39. Allahabad Bank, Alipur Bhadar, Vill & PO Frem Nagal Distt. Fatehpur (UP) wordbot 17 yoммоний к 40. Allahabad Bank, Makanpur Mahoi , Vill . & PO/Malo Distt. Fatehpur (UP) .
41. Allahabad Bank , Saifai Vill& PO Saifai Distt - Etawah ( UP ) .
1 42. Allahabad Bank, Tirwa ,Vill & PO Tirwa, Distt - Kannauj ( UP ), 43. Allahabad Bank, Agra Khandari , Padam Chandra Institute Khandari , Agra (UP).
44.AllahabadBank, CityMontessori School , Br. Vishal Khand, Gomati Nagar -2, Lucknow226010 ( UP) ,
45. Allahabad Bank , JanakipuramBranch , Adarsh Complex Engineering Crossing, Janak puram - Lucknow, (UP ) .
[भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
46. Allahabad Bank, Lalganj Branch , 1st Floor , Tejgaon Complex , Lalganj , Distt . Rae Bareli (UP) .
47. Allahabad Bank , Maharshi Vidya mandir , Sitapur Road, IIM Turn , Lucknow-226020 (UP) .
48. Allahabad Bank , F.D.S.O. , KG Dental University , Lucknow- 226003 (UP).
49. Allahabad Bank , Mohanganj , Rae Bareli Road, Mohanganj , Tehsil- Tiloi, Distt. Rae Bareli (UP) .
50. Allahabad Bank, Salon , Mohalla Paigambarpur, Post Salon, Distt, Rae Bareli (UP) ,
51. Allahabad Bank, α Unchahar , Allahabad Road, Main Market, Unchahar, Distt . Rae Bareli ( UP) ,
52. Allahabad Bank, Jagdishpur, Shantivan , Jagdishpur , Distt. Sultanpur (UP) .
53. Allahabad Bank, Musafirkhana, Opp. P.H.C. Ward No. 10, Musafirkhana, Distt. Sultanpur (UP) .
54. Allahabad Bank , to Maharajganj Bachrawan Road, Maharajganj , Distt. Rae Bareli (UP) .
55. Allahabad Bank , Staff College Branch, 21/483 , Indira Nagar , Lucknow (UP).
56. Allahabad Bank, ZonalOffice Court Road Deoghar , s Jharkhand- 814112 ..
57. Allahabad Bank, Deoghar, New Sarwan Road, Deoghar, Jharkhand- 814112 .
58. Allahabad Bank, 61 ed Jantara New Town, Near Gandhi Maidan, Jharkhand.
59. Allahabad Bank, Daltonganj , House of Gopal Lal Agarwal , Arhat Road, Daltonganj , Distt . Palamu, Jharkhand .
60. Allahabad Bank, Saraikela, Ward No. 2, House of Hariharprasad... Sahu, Distt . Saraikela, Jharkhand- 833219 , 61. Allahabad Bank , Simdega Main Road , Distt . Simdega , Jharkhand - 835223 .
62. Allahabad Bank, Brambe ; Central Training Institute , Brambe , Distt . Ranchi , Jharkhand.
63. Allahabad Bank, Saint Andreqs College Branch, Gorakhpur, (UP).
9409
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
64. AllahabadBank, J.N.N. Public School , Gorakhnath Gorakhpur, (UP).
65. Allahabad Bank, Bairia Branch, P.O. Bairia Distt. Ballia , (UP ) .
66. Allahabad Bank, Khora Ganeshji Road, Madanganj , Kishangadh, Distt.Ajmer, Rajasthan.
67. Allahabad Bank , Gali No. 1 Raja Park, Jaipur , Rajasthan.
68. Allahabad Bankk.Inc KEC International Ltd. , Jotwara, Road, Jaipur , Rajasthans
69. Allahabad Barik, C-206, RIICO Colony, Anbu Road, Distt. Sirohi, Rajasthan.
70. AllahabadBank, JilaParishad Branch , Orai , Distt . Jalaun (U.P. ) .
71. Allahabad Bank, Sector 34A, Sco 23-24-25 , Distt. Chandigarh , Chandigarh (UT) 160022.
72. Allahabad Bank......... Phawara Chowk, Old Bus Stand, Civil Road Gohana, Distt . Sonipat, Haryana- 131301 ...
73. Allahabad Bank, SCF/90, Green Square Market, Distt. Hissar, Haryana- 125001 .
74. Allahabad Bank, G.T. Road, Opp . Bus Stand, Palwal , Distt.Faridabad , Haryana.
75. Allahabad Bank, Service Branch, SCO 49-50 , (3rd Floor ), Bank Square, Sector 17 -B, Chandigarh- 160017 .
76. Allahabad Bank, Civil Lines Branch, 22, P.D. Tandon Marg , Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh .
77. Allahabad Bank, Recovery Branch 22 , P.D. Tandon Marg , Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh .
78. Allahabad Bank , Chandauli Branch , G.T. Road , Vill . & Post Chandauli , Uttar Pradesh .
79. Allahabad Bank , Kachnar Branch (Rajatalab), G.T. Road, Rajatalab , Distt. Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .
80. Allahabad Bank , Varanasi Kashi Vidyapeeth University, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth Campus , Distt. Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .
81. Allahabad Bank, Saidpur Branch , Vill . & Post Saidpur , Distt. Ghazipur , Uttar Pradesh .
82. Allahabad Bank ,
Service Branch Varanasi Kashi Vidyapeeth Road C/314-2 Vidyapeeth Road , Distt . Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .
9410
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
83. Allahabad Bank , Devgaon Branch , Varanasi -Azamgarh Road , Distt . Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .
84. Allahabad Bank, Varanasi Shivpurva Branch , House No. D-59/6F , Rathyatra Crossing Mahmoorganj Road , Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh.
85. Allahabad Bank, Jiyanpur Branch, Vill . & post Jiyanpur , Distt . Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh.
86. Allahabad Bank, Ravindrapuri Branch , B-36/ 10 P -J , Opp. Manas Mandir Lanka Road, Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .
87. Allahabad Bank , Varanasi S.S. Vishvidyalaya, Sampurnand Sanskrit Vishvidyalaya Campus JagatGanj , Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .
88. AllahabadBank, Varanasi U.P. College Campus Branch Bhojubir , Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh ,
89. Allahabad Bank, Rohini Branch, Sector- 14 Extn. Rohini , Delhi- 110085.
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] CHANDIGARH
2. Union Bank of India, Branch -C.R. College ofEducation Rajgadh Road , Hissar, Pin- 125001
3. Union Bank of India, Branch -Sector- 32 , Chandigarh ( U.T. ) .
JAIPUR
4. Union Bank of India, Jhunjhunu Branch , House No. D - 14(Ka) Jhunjhunu - 333 001 .
5. Union Bank of India, Sukhadia Circle Branch, Hindustan Zinc Bhavan , Udaipur-313001.
RAIPUR
6. Union Bank of India, Ambikapur Branch , Deviganj Road, Post -Ambikapur, Distt . Sarguja, C.G. 497 001 .
7. Union Bank of India, Champa Branch , Barpali Chowk, Station Road, PostChampa, Distt . Janjgir-Champa C.G. Pin-495 671 .
JABALPUR
90. Allahabad Bank, Quick Collection Service Branch , 17, $ansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001.
91. Allahabad Bank, Industrial Finance Branch , 17, Sansad Marg, New Delhi- 110001 .
92. Allahabad Bank, NewRajendra Nagar, New Delhi -110060.
93. Allahabad Bank, B-3, Bulbul Nest , Ashok Niketan, Anand Vihar , New Delhi -110092 .
94. Allahabad Bank , Service Branch 1 , Scindia House , Janpath , New Delhi - 110001 .
95. Allahabad Bank , Janakpuri Branch , A- 3 /32, Janakpuri , NewDelhi .
96. Allahabad Bank, 12-C , Meera Nagar , Bhilwara Road , Chittorgarh , Rajasthan.
97. Allahabad Bank , Trehan Bhawan , Sikar , Rajasthan .
98. Allahabad Bank, : Pugalia Bhawan , Khera Road , Balotra, Distt . Banner, Rajasthan.
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Official Language Implementation Division, Central Office, Mumbai
Branches/Offices recommended for notification under Official Language Rule 10(4)
Name and Address of the Regional Office :
DELHI
1. Union Bank of India Sector 62, Noida Branch , C-56 A/28 , Sector - 62, Noida, Uttar Pradesh , Pin-201 307
8. Union Bank of India, Madan mahal Branch , Opp, Gulati Petrol Pump , Madan Mahal, Nagpur , Jabalpur ( M.P. ) 482 002 .
9. Union Bank of India, Gotegaon Branch , Chaurasia Complex main Road, Gotegaon, Distt . Narsinghpur -487118 .
10. Union Bank of India , Service Branch, Shyam Arcade, Malviya Chowk, Jabalpur ( M.P. ) , 482001.
LUCKNOW
11. Union Bank of India , Jankipuram Branch , 1 /C, 1/343 , Sector-G, Sahara Estate Road, Aliganj Extension , Distt . Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226021 .
12. Union Bank of India, Branch -Faizabad Road , LucknowMatiyari Chauraha, Chinhat , Faixabad Road, Distt. Lucknow Uttar Pradesh- 266 016 .
KANPUR
13. Union Bank of India, Barra World Bank Branch , J - 19 & J - 19A , Barra World Bank, Karrhi Road, Kanpur , Uttar Pradesh-208027 .
14. Union Bank of India, Yashoda Nagar Branch 81 , Pashupati Nagar , Yashoda Nagar, kanpur , Uttar Pradesh -208011 .
MEERUT
15. Union Bank of India, Bulandshahr Branch , Raja Babu Road , Bulandshahr- 203 001 , Distt . Bulandshahr (U.P. ) ..
16. Union Bank of India , Sonkh Crossing Mathura Branch , Sonkh Crossing Mathura, Distt . Mathura , Uttar Pradesh .
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
17. Union Bank of India
Rampur Civil Lines , Jamia Tus Salehat , Maulana Shaukat Ali Road, Civil Lines , Rampur -244901 (Uttar Pradesh)
18. Union Bank of India
Bijnor Branch, Kothi Antaghar, 183 , Civil Lines , Bijnor, Distt, Bijnor; Uttar Pradesh
19. Union Bank of India
Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad, Nagar nigam , Navyug Market, Ghaziabad-201 001 (U.P.)
20. Union Bank of India
Rajnagar Ghaziabad, St. Paul Academy, Sector -9 , Rajnagar, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.)
AZAMGARH
21. Union Bank of India
Belaisa Branch, near Chanakya Cinema Hall Sarfuddinpur, Azamgarh (U.P.) Pin -276001 RANCHI
22. Union Bank of India
DeogharBranch, Indralok Complex, Tower Chowk, Station Road, Deoghar , Pin - 814001 , Distt. Deoghar, ( Jharkhand)
23. Union Bank of India
ChaibasaBranch , New Jain Market, Court Road, Chaibasa, Pin- 833201 , Distt. Chaibasa, (Jharkhand)
BARODA
24. Union Bank of India
Waracha Road Branch , Shantaba Complex, Waracha Road, Surat -395006
AHMEDABAD
25. Union Bank of India
Drive- in- Road Branch, Shailly Coinplex, Near Surdhara Circle , Sał Hospital Road, OffDrive- in-Road, Ahmedabad-380054 THANE
26. Union Bank of India
Ghodbunder Road Branch, Gala No. 7 to 11 , Ground Floor , Solitaire Towers, Gihodbunder Road, Chitalsar , Manpada, Thane (West ), 400607 27. Union Bank of India
Airoli Branch , Blacksmith Tower, Ground Floor , Plot No. 14, Sector 6 , Airoli, Navi Mumbai -400708 28. Union Bank of India
Wadkhal Branch, Post Wadkhal, Wadkhal Naka, Taluka Pen, District Raigad 402107
BANGALORE
29. Union Bank of India
HSR Layout Branch, Sri Rajarajeshwashwarinagar, 9th nain, VII Sector , HSR Layout, Bangalore
30. Union Bank of India
RT Nagar Branch, 254/ 1BMP , 5th.Cross, Vasantapp Block, R- T Nagar , Bangalore
9411
''भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
31. Union Bank of India
PES School ofEngineering Hosur Road, Near Electronic City, Bangalore-560100
32. Union Bank of India
Kuvempunagar Branch , 111 , CSG Arcade, Ganganchumbi , Double Road, Kuvempunagar , Mysore-570023,
HYDERABAD
33. Union Bank of India
Mehadipatnam Branch , Syed Plaza, Opp. Cristal Garden, Attapur Road , Marutinagar, Mehadipatnam Ring Road, Hyderabad- 500008 34. Union Bank of India
Kamlapuri Colony Branch , Plot No. 335, Phase III , Near Kamalapuri Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad-500073
VIJAYWADA
35. Union Bank of India
Service Branch , 1st Floor , Rishab Towers , Convent Street, Vijaywada 520001 , Distt . Krishna, (Andhra Pradesh)
36. Union Bank of India
Gudivada Branch , Ground Floor , 10-137, Opp . Gandhi Bomma, Eluru Road, Guidivada, 521301 , Distt. Krishna, (Andhra Pradesh)
37. Union Bank of India
Machilipatnam Branch , Ground Floor , 18/1 , Opp . RTC Bus Stand , Englishpalem , Machilipatnam -521001 , Distt . Krishna, (Andhra Pradesh)
38. Union Bank of India
Mandanpalle Branch , Ground Floor, No. 15-6-05- 02, Opp. RTC Bus Stand, Madanapalle 517325 , Chitoor Distt. ( A.Ρ.)
VISHAKHAPATNAM
39. Union Bank of India
Gajuwaka Branch , Door No. 7-5-59 , R.K. Plaza , Chettivanipalem NH -5 , Opposite Elecrical Sub-Station, Gajuwaka -530026, Post & Distt . Visakhapatnam
40. Union Bank of India
Madhuravada Branch , Door No. 6-111/6 , Shri Subbalakshmi Complex, Near Durga Theatre , Chandrampalem , NH-5 , Madhuravada-530041 , Post & Distt. Visakhapatnam
41. Union Bank of India
Tuni Branch , Door No. 8-10-58 , Opp . Kanyaka Parameswari Temple , Bellapu Veedhi , Tuni -533401 , East Godavari District
42. Union Bank of India
Narsipatnam Branch , Door No. 34-125/ 1 , Ramarao Peta, Narsipatnam -531116, Distt . Visakhapatnam 43. Union Bank of India
Mandapeta Branch , Door No. 34-16-7 , Kamath Arcade, Main Road, Mandapeta - 533308 , East Godavari District 9412
[PART II SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
44. Union Bank of India
Atchutapuram Branch , Door No. 5-45, Pudimadaka Road, Atchutapuram , Pin Code 531011 Distt . Visakhapatnam
BHUVANESHWAR
45. Union Bank of India
Barbil Branch, Station Road, Barbil , Distt. Keonjhar -758035 , Orissa
ERNAKULAM
46. Union Bank of India
Kalamassery Branch, IV/465 -A, Opp . Apollo Tyres Ltd. , North Kalamassery- 683104, Distt.Ernakulam, (Kerala)
47. Union Bank of India
Poonithura Branch , 29 /2862 -A , Aditya Gandhi Square, poonithura 6823177 , Distt . Ernakulam, (Kerala)
48. Union Bank of India
Mulanthuruthy Branch , Karickal Estate , Chottanicara Road , Mularnthuruthy 682314, Distt. Ernakulam, (Kerala)
49. Union Bank of India
VadanapallyBranch, VII/491 , L-P. micas Building, Vadanpally-680514, Distt . Thrissur(Kerala) 50. Union Bank of India
KunnamkulamBranch , Cross View Building , Guruvayoor Road , Kunnamkulam -680503 , Distt. Thrissur (Kerala)
51. Union Bank of India
Tirur Branch , 20/ 1042 - A, Kundini Complex Hospital Road, Thayepalam , Tirur- 676101 , Distt. Malappuram (Kerala)
52. Union Bank of lindia
Peringottukara Branch , VI/ 163-164, Ramakrishna Building, perigottukara- 680565, Distt . Thrissur, (Kerala)
53. Union Bank of India
MullasseryBranch , VIII/266 , Vilikiyat Building, Mullassery-680509, Distt. Thrissur (Kerala) TIRUVANTAPURAM
54. Union Bank of India
Attingal Branch , Shams complex , Opp . KSRTC , Bus Stand, Attingal, Trivandrum Distt. , Kerala 695101
55. Union Bank of India
Pattorn Branch , Keshavadasapuram Junction, Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala 695004
56. Union Bank of India
PeroorkadaBranch , A1 Madolil R.J. Towers , Peroorkada, Thruvananthapuram , Kerala 695005 57. Union Bank of India
Kollam Civil Station Branch , Deva priya Complex, High School junction , Kollam 695009 Kerala GUWAHATI
58. Union Bank of Indian
Adabari Branch , Habibur-Rahman Shopping Complex, 1st Floor , Adabari Main Road, Opp . Adabari Bus Stand, Guwahati -781014 59. Union Bank of India , inpt
Hatigaon Branch, Main Road Hathigaon Chariali, Hatigaon Vetapara, VIP Road, Post Dispur Sachivalaya, Distt. Kamrup (Urban) Guwahati -781038
60. Union Bank of India
Duliajan Branch, Station Road Daily Bazar , Post-Duliajan , Distt . Dibrugarh, PinCode 786602
61. Union Bank of India R
L.N. Bari Road Branch, 13 , Thana Road,Ganraj Chaumuhani, Post- Agartala, Distt. West Tripura , Tripura-799001
62. Union Bank of India
G.S. RoadBranch, Jugal Bazar , 1st Floor , Ganeshguri Chariali , Post Dispur, Guwahati ,Distt . Kammrup (Urban),PinCode-781006
63. Union Bank of India
Hijuguri Branch, Amar Complex, 1st Floor, A.T. Road , Hijuguri , Post Tinsukia, d PinCode-786125
INDIAN BANK
Listof Branches/Offices of Indian Bank to be notified under Rule 10(4) of Official Language Rules în the Gazette ofGovernment of India
:
1. Indian Bank
Circleoffice : Liberty Plaza 4th floor Himayat Nagar Hyderabad-5000029, A PO 2. Indian Bark
Kukatpalli Plot number 70 , phase - 1 Dharamareddy colony, Near(opp ) : J.N.T.U. Kukatpalli Hyderabadk 5000072, Α.Ρ
3. Indian Bank
Gachibowli :Plot number 12-16 , Survey number 93 , Cyber Apartments, Gachibowli Hyderabad- 500008 , A.P.
4. IndianBank
Banzara Hills : Flat Number 101 , Lapolama caves , Road Number 12 , Banzara Hills Hyderabad- 5000045, A.P
5. Indian Bank
Mosapeth : Indian Container Depo Goodsshed Road, Mosapeth Hyderabad -5000029 , A
6. IndianBank
Kalyannagar : Door number 8-3-168 /M/ 13 , Shriramnagar, Kalyannagar , Phase - III , Yusufguda Post, Hyderabad-5000045 , A.P
7. Indian Bank
B- 1 /7 , Ashok Vihar Phase II New Delhi - 110052 8. Indian Bank
C-47, Preet Vihar Vikas Marg New Delhi - 110092 9413 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
9. Indian Bank
11 . Sonagiri Branch ( CodeNo. 442 ) H- 7 , Sarla Towar, Piplani , Opposite Petrol pump, Bhopal-462021
Agrawal Tarun Plaza DDA Shopping Centre Tarun Plaza Pitampura Delhi -110034
10. Indian Bank Jamiya Millia Islamia Branch Moulana Mohd. All Jowhar Marg Jamiya Nagar New
12. Jaora Sugar Mill Branch , Code No.446 , Near Petrol Pump, Chaupati , Jaora-457226.
Delhi-110025
11. Indian Bank
13. A.B.Road Branch , Code No.450 , Scheme No.54, A.B. Road, Near Press Complex, Indore -452010 Agarwal Mal 1 Floor Plot No. 3 Sector- 5 Ashirwad Chowk Dwarka New Delhi- 110075
14. Umaria Branch , Code No.451 , Near Gandhi Chowk, Umaria-484661
12. Indian Bank
15. Dindori Branch , Code No. 452 , Main Road , Dindori -481880
Assest Recovery Management Branch Upper Ground Floor World Trade Centre Babar Road New Delhi 110001 .
13. Indian Bank
16. Personal Banking Branch , Jabalpur , Code No.454 , Sadar Cant, Main Road Jabalpur -482001
Show Room No. 4-5-7-8 Raheja Ground Floor , Front Side IMT Manesar Gurgaon Haryana- 122050
17. Rajendra Nagar, Branch Indore, Code No. 457, 119 B , Abhiman Plaza, Rajendra Nagar, Indore-452012 14. Indian Bank
G-3, Orchid Square Ground Floor Sushant Lok Gurgaon Haryana 122002
18. Annapurna Road, Br. Indore , Code No.458, Bank Colony,Annapurna Road, Indore-452009 15. Indian Bank
19. Kurwar Branch, Rajgarh , Code No. 459, Kurear Mandi , Distt. Rajgarh (Blora)-465674
1491/31 , Shivaji Colony Chowk Rohtak, Haryana 124001.
16. Indian Bank
20. Rau Branch , Code No. 460, Opposite Govt . Girls Higher Secondary School , A.B.Road Rau-453331 DAV College Chandigarh Road Hoshiarpur , Punjab-146001 .
17. Indian Bank
21. Areara Hills Branch , Bhopal , Code No. 461 , Plot No.59, New Narmada Bhawan , A- Wing, First Floor , Arera Hills ,Bhopal-462001
56 A/B , Gandhi Nagar Jammu , Jammu & Kahmir 1800004.
STATE BANK OF INDORE
22. Regional Office , Ratlam , Code No. 471 , 2 Freeganj , Do Batti Chouraha, Ratlam -457001 .
List of Branches/Offices for notification under rule
10(4) of Rajasthan Niyam , 1976 .
23. Central Pension Processing Centre , Code No. 472, 163 , Ghiya Chambers , Kanchanbagh , Indore -452001 .
MADHYA PRADESH
24. Small Enterprises Credit Cell, Code No. 475 , 22, Palshikar Colony, Indore-452004 .
1. Ring Road , Bombay Hospital Branch, 463, Code No. I P.U. 4 , NearBombay Hospital , Ring Road, Indore- 452010
25. Retail Assests & Small Enterprises Credit Cell , Code No. 476, 1 , Arera Hills, Bhopal -462004.
2. Pachore Branch, ( Code No. 465 ) A.B. Road, Pachore (Distt . Rajgarh) -465683
26. Currency administration Cell , Code No. 480 , Scheme No.54, A.B : Road , Near Press Complex, Indore-452010.
3. Mandleshwar Branch , ( Code No. 466 ) 2 , Chhapandev Marg , Ward No. 14, Kasrawad Road square , Near Bus Stand, Mandleshwar - 451221 .
27. Retail Assets Credit processing centre , Code No. 478, Ist, Floor, Kothari Market, M.G.Road, Indore -452007 .
NEW DELHI
4. Holkar Science College Branch, ( Code No. 467 ) Holkar Science College Campus , Indore-452017
5. I.E.T. Branch , ( Code No. 470 ) 1.E.T. , Khandwa Road, Indore-452017
28. Retail Assets & Small Enterprises Credit Cell , Code No.477 , 16/15 , WEA Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi- 110005 .
CHHATISGARH
6. Seoni Malwa Branch , ( Code No. 474 ) , 131 Seth Pusamal Marg Jain Swetamber Mandir Trust Bhawan , Ward No. 11 , Seoni Malwa-461223
7. Housing Finance Branch ( Code No. 441.) Khel Prashal , Race Course Road , Indore -452003
29. Motibagh Branch , Raipur , Code No. 443 , F -Block, Modern Complex, Motibagh , Raipur-492001 .
RAJASTHAN
8. Spl . Assets Maharani Recovery Management Branch ( Code No. 444 ) 9, Maharani Road , Siyaganj , Indore-452007
30. Udaipur Branch , Code No. 449 , Exchange Complex , Udaipur- 313001 ...
UTTAR PRADESH
9. Mid Corporate Commercial Branch ( Code No. 447 ) 12, Agrawal Nagar , Sapna Sangeeta Road , [ndore- 452001
10. Service Branch Jabalpur ( CodeNo. 448 ) Sadar Cant, Main Road Jabalpur- 482001
31. Collectorate Campus Branch , Agra, Code No. 464 , Collectorate Campus , Agra ( U.P) -282010.
9414
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
18. Central Bank of India , Parsoria Branch, Gram & Post Parsoria, Distt . Sagar M.P. , Parsoria- 470667.
1. Central Bank of India, Chhatrpura Branch , 100 , Jawahar Marg, Kanpur Jhansi Raod , Chhatrpura, Dist Chhatrpura, Pin-471001 .
19. Central Bank of India, Bahrol Branch, Gran & Post Barhol, Distt . Sagar M.P, Bahrol - 470772.
2. Central Bank of India, Rasulian Branch, SMP Gate No. 1, Harda Road, Rasulian Hosangabad M.P.
20. Central Bank of India, Sukhakheri Branch, Gram & Post Sukhakheri . Tahsil Gadarwara, Distt. Narsinghpur M.P. , Sukhakheri - 487785 .
3. Central Bank of India, PipariaBranch, Kirana Bajar , Purana GalaMandi , Piparia, M.P.
21. Central Bank of India, Regional Office, First Floor, Esslayhall, Rajpur Road, Dehradun (Uttarkhand) -248001 .
4. Central Bank of India, Moginand Branch, Gaon & Dakkhana Moginand, Dist. Sirmore, Tahsil Nahan - 173030.
22. Central Bank of India, K.KDegree College, Etawah, U.P.
23. Central Bank of India, LIC ofIndia, Barelly, U.P.
5. Central Bank of India, Mandi Gutkar Branch, Main Road, NH - 21 , Dist Mandi , Tahsil Sadarmandi - 175021 .
24. Central Bank ofIndia, Bijnore, Bijnore , U.P.
6. Central Bank of India, Urban Estate Branch, SCF 45 , Sector - 7, Dist. Karnal , Urban Estate Karnal - 132001 .
25. Central Bank of India, Kiravali , Agra, U.P.
7. Central Bank of India,
Sukhpura Chowk, Sukhpura 63-66, Ward NO.12, Dist Rohtak.
26. Central Bank ofIndia, D.A.V Collge, Karnpur, Dehradun ( Uttrakhand)- 248001.
27. Central Bank of India, JantaMahavidhalya Ajitmal , Distt. Auriya U.P. 8. Central Bank ofIndia, Saha Branch , 71 - A, Near Bus Stand, Sahjadpur Road, Dist . Ambala, Saha - 133104.
9. Central Bank of India,
28. Central Bank of India, CivilLines, Rampur, U.P.
Dharmshala Branch , Main Market, Dist . Dharmshala, Pin-176052.
29. Central Bank of India, L.R.P.G College, Gaziabad, U.P.
10. Central Bank of India, Narvana Branch, DSS 15 , Huda Commercial, Near RailwayRoad, Dist . Jind, Narvana - 126116.
30. Central Bank of India, Naurangabad ,G.T. Road Naurangabad , Alligarh, U.P.
31. Central Bank of Indla, D.B.S. College, Karanpur, Deharadun (Uttrakhand) -248001.
11. Central Bank of India, Bahadurgarh Branch , Vaishya Arya Kaneya Mahavidhalya, Dist . Jhajjar , Bahadurgarh - 123307.
32. Central Bank ofIndia, N.T.P.C. Distt. Auriya, U.P.
12. Central Bank of India, RohtakBranch, All India Jat Hiroj Memorial College, Delhi Road, Rohtak - 124001 .
33. Central Bank of India, Khiri , Lakhipur Khiri , U.P.
13. Central Bank of India , Manmad Branch, Surana sankul , Shivaji Chowk, Manmad -423104, Maharashtra .
34. Central Bank of India, Regional Shrigandhi Ashram, Alligarh, U.P.
14. Central Bank ofIndia , Shrinivas Market , Old Kalvan Road, Behind S T Stand, Dindiri , Dist. Nasik Maharashtra.
35. Central Bank of India, Cammbrian Hall , Dehradun ( Uttrakhand ) -248001 .
15. Central Bank of India,
36. Central Bank of India, Nagar Nigam Barelly, Barelly, U.P.
Gopalganj Branch , Yadopur Road , Dist . Gopalganj , p.o. Gopalganj -841428.
37. Central Bank of India, Shahjanhapur , Shahjanhapur , U.P.
16. Central Bank of India, Narsingpur Road (M.P. ) , Narsingpur Road - 480001, Dist. - Chhindwara .
38. Central Bank of India , Goverdhan, Dig Adda, Mathura, U.P.
39. Central Bank of India, ZonalOffice, 33 , Central Bank Building, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata - 700001 .
17. Central Bank of India , Gopalganj Branch , Gopalganj Sagar M.P. , Sagar-470001.
9415 [ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii)]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD
18. State Bank of Hyderabad , Jadcherla Branch , ( Code No. 921 ), Nalgonda Branch , Pin - 509301 .
List of Branches Eligible for being notified under Rule 10 (4) ofOfficial Languages Rules
19. State Bank of Hyderabad , Indiranagar Branch , ( Code No. 835 ) , Kamareddy , Nizamabad district, Pin - 503111 .
1. State Bank ofHyderabad, Alampur Branch , ( Code No. 189 ), Mahaboobnagar District, Pin - 509153 .
20. State Bank of Hyderabad , MSRNagar Branch , ( Code No. 871 ) , Kurnool , Kurnool District, Pin - 518001 .
2. State Bank of Hyderabad , Balanagar Branch , ( Code No. 442 ) , Mahaboobnagar District, Pin - 509202 .
21. State Bank of Hyderabad , SIB Branch , ( Code No. 932 ), Miryalguda, Nalgonda District, Pin - 508207 .
3. State Bank ofHyderabad, Armoor Branch, ( Code No. 110 ), Nizamabad District, Pin -503224 .
22. State Bank of Hyderabad, Maithri Women's College Branch , ( Code No. 952 ) , Nalgonda, Nalgonda Distirct, Pin - 508001 .
4. State Bank ofHyderabad, Ramkote Branch , ( Code No. 350 ) , Hyderabad, Pin-500001.
23. State Bank of Hyderabad , Prakasham Bazzar Branch , ( Code No. 819 ) , Nalgonda, Pin- 508001 .
5. State Bank ofHyderabad, Ramnagar Branch , ( Code No. 471 ), Hyderabad , Pin--500020.
6. State Bank of Hyderabad, Saidabad Branch , ( Code No. 345 ) , Hyderabad , Pin--500059.
24. State Bank ofHyderabad , Mettugadda Branch , ( Code No. 920 ) , Mahaboobnagar , Mahaboobnagar District , Pin- 509001 .
7. State Bank ofHyderabad , Secretariat Branch , ( Code No. 77 ) , Hyderabad , Pin-500022 .
25. State Bank of Hyderabad , Nandyal Branch, ( Code No. 677 ) , Kurnool District, Pin- 518501.
8. State Bank ofHyderabad , Punjagutta Branch , ( Code No. 72 ) , Hyderabad , Pin-500082.
26. State Bank of Hyderabad , Pragathi Bhavan Complex, ( Code No. 961 ) , Nizamabad District, Pin - 503001 .
9. State Bank ofHyderabad , Sultan Bazzar Branch , ( Code No. 62 ) , Hyderabad , Pin- 500195.
27. State Bank of Hyderabad, Nizamsagar Branch , ( Code No. 552 ), Nizamabad District, Pin - 503002 ..
10. State Bank of Hyderabad, CityBranch , ( Code No. 73 ) , Hyderabad, Pin-500002.
28. State Bank of Hyderabad , Pangal Branch , ( Code No. 444 ) , Nizamabad District , Pin- 509112 .
11. State Bank ofHyderabad, Moghulpura Branch , ( Code No. 596 ), Hyderabad, Pin- 500001 .
29. State Bank of Hyderabad , RajampetBranch , ( Code No. 503 ) Nizamabad District, Pin- 503001 .
12. State Bank of Hyderabad , NRI Branch , ( Code No. 740 ), Hyderabad, Pin-500029
30..State Bank of Hyderabad, Raithunagar ( Mirzapur ) Branch ( Code No. 559 ) Nizamabad District, Pin - 503301 .
13. State Bank of Hyderabad, Nallakunta Branch, ( Code No. 83 ), Hyderabad , Pin-500044.
31. State Bank ofHyderabad , Tirupathi ( Main ) Branch, ( Code No. 328 ), Tirupathi , Pin - 517501 .
14. State Bank of Hyderabad , Nampally Station Road Branch, ( Code No. 79 ), Hyderabad, Pin - 500001 .
32. State Bank of Hyderabad, ThorlikondaBranch, ( Code No. 562 ) Nizamabad District, Pin- 503175 .
15. State Bank of Hyderabad, Malakpet Elranch , ( Code No. 61 ) , Hyderabad, Pin- 500024.
33. State Bank of Hyderabad , Hunwada Branch, ( Code No. 608 ) , Mahaboobnagar District, Pin - 509334 .
16. State Bank of Hyderabad , Mahabbobgunj Branch , ( Code No. 69 ), Hyderabad, Pin- 500012.
34. State Bank ofHyderabad , Husnabad Branch , ( Code No. 618 ), Mahaboobnagar District , Pin - 509350 .
35. State Bank ofHyderabad , ADB Gaddipally, ( Code No. 481 ) Nalgonda District , Pin- 508201 .
17. State Bank of Hyderabad , Janpahad Branch , ( Code No. 686 ) , Nalgonda District, Pin - 508218 .
4,506 G1 /07-4 9416
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
36. State Bank of Hyderabad, Chityal Branch, ( Code No. 567 ) , Nalgonda District , Pin-504306.
37. State Bank of Hyderabad, Chivemula Branch, ( Code No. 643 ) Nalgonda District, Pin - 508213 .
38. State Bank of Hyderabad , Chandur Branch , ( Code No. 368) Nizamabad District, Pin - 503206 .
39. State Bank ofHyderabad, BomraspetBranch, ( Code No. 405 ) Mahaboobnagar District, Pin - 509338 .
40, StateBank of Hyderabad, Bethavole Branch, ( Code No. 563 ) Nalgonda District, Pin- 508204 .
41. State Bank of Hyderabad, Donkal Branch, ( Code No. 522 ) Nalgonda District, Pin-503311.
42. State Bank of Hyderabad , Jaklajr Branch, ( Code No. 676 ) Mahabobnagar 53 District, Pin - 509353 .
43, State Bank of Hyderabad, Kollapur Branch , ( Code No. 195 ) Mahaboobnagar District , Pin - 509102 .
44. State Bank of Hyderabad, Khudavanur Branch, ( Code No. 550 ) Nizamabad District, Pin - 503212.
45. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kothakota Branch , ( Code No. 690 ), Mahaboobnagar District, Pin - 509381.
46. State Bank of Hyderabad, PVN Colony Branch , ( Code No. 856 ) Mahaboobnagar , Mahaboobnagar Dist , Pin- 509001 .
47. State Bank of Hyderabad, Nawabpet Branch , ( Code No. 381 ) Mahaboobnagar District , Pin- 509340 .
48. State Bank of Hyderabad, Palem Branch ,( Code No. 738 ) Nizamabad District, Pin-503225.
49, State Bank of Hyderabad, Pothangal Branch , ( Code No. 747) Nizamabad District, Pin - 503219 .
50. State Bank of Hyderabad , Pulicherla Branch, ( Code No. 622) Nizamabad District, Pin - 508266 .
51. State Bank of Hyderabad , Tirupathi Main Branch , P.M.R. Complex, Opp . New Municipal Office, Tirupathi - 517501 .
52. State Bank of Hyderabad, Adinath Commercial Complex, Shop Nos . 1,2, Bibvewadi , Pune - 411037.
53. State Bank of Hyderabad, A-64, Gokuldham, Geregaon East, Mumbai - 400063 .
[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii) ] ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE BareillyRegion
1. Oriental Bank ofCommerce, Guru DarshanBuilding, Kutchery Road, Lakhimpur Khiri , Pin - 246731 .
2. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Alipur Chowk, Chopula, Delhi Road, Gajraula, Pin- 244235 .
3. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Dr. JakirHussain Road, Dhampur ( Distt.: Bijnor) .
4. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Nanda Lines , Ram Nagar, ( Distt .: Nainital ) Uttaranchal.
5. Oriental Bank ofCommerce , Vill . Matkota, ( SIDCUL ) P.O.: Pant Nagar, ( Distt.: US Nagar ) Uttaranchal .
6. Oriental Bank of Commerce , C- 18B, Deen Dayal Puram , Bareilly, Pin - 243122 . Sriganganagar
7. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 5 - D - 7 ( HUDCO ) J.N.V. Nagar , Bikaner, Pin - 334003.
8. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Kesar Villa, Alakh Sagar Road , Modern Market, Bikaner, Pin- 334001 .
9. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Kothari Medical & Research Centre, Gajner Road, Bikaner, Pin - 334004.
10. Oriental Bank of Commerce ,. Engineering College , Poogal Road, Bikaner , Pin- 334004.
11. Oriental Bank ofCommerce, Near Main Bus Stand, Chohilawali , Via: Pilibanga, Distt.:Hanumangarh, Pin - 335803 .
12. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Sriganganagar Zila Dugdh Utpadak , Sakkari Sangh Ltd. , Industrial Area , Hanumangarh Juncition , Pin: 335512 .
13. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti , New Dhan Mandi , Hanumangarh Junction , Pin +335512.
14. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Setho Ka Bazar , Main Market, Laxmangarh , Distt.: Sikar, Pin - 332311 .
15. Oriental Bank of Commerce , New Dhan Mandi , Rawla Mandi , Tahsil : Gharsana , Distt.: Sriganganagar , Pin - 335707.
16. Oriental Bank of Commerce, National Highway, Bikaner Road, Nokha, Distt. Bikaner, Pin - 334801 .
17. Oriental Bank of Commerce) I.A.S.E. ( Deemed University ) Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahar, Distt. Churu, Pin - 331403 .
18. Oriental Bank of Commerce ,j Municipal Council, Kutcheri Road, Sriganganagar , Pin- 335001 .
[भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
19. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 39-40 , P. Block, Sriganganagar, Distt. Sriganganagar, Pin. 335001 .
Agra
20. Oriental Bank ofCommerce , Opp. C.L. Jain Degree College , industrial Area, Agra Road, Firozabad .
21. Oriental Bank of Commerce , B.S.A.College ofEngineering & Technology, Bhuteshwar Road Mathura, Pin 281001 .
22. Oriental Bank of Commerce , K.ID. Dental College NH - 2, Agra Delhi Road, Mathura, Pin-281006.
Bhopal
23. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 7/5, Area Colony , Bhopal , Pin -462016 .
24. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Shri Guru Nanak Girls Higher Secondary School , Prem Nagar, Madan Mahal , Jabalpur, Pin -482002 .
Karnal
25. Oriental Elank of Commerce , A.S. Sr. Secondary School , Aryasamaj Chowk , Ambala City, Pin - 133001 .
25. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Inder Bhan ( L) , Bharatari Education Society , G.T. Road, Panipat , Pin - 132103 .
27. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Kurukshetra University , Distt . Kurukshetra, Pin-136119 .
23. Oriental Bank of Commerce , LalMaternity & General Hospital I.T.I. Road, Yamunanagar, Pin- 135001 .
29. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Near Anaj Mandi , Ambala- Hissar Road, Ismailabad, Distt . Kurukshetra .
30. Oriental Bank of Commerce , H.S.D.C. Building , G.T. Road , V. & P.O. Umari , Distt. Kurukshetra .
31. Oriental Bank of Commerce , S.C.O. No. 23-24 , Sector- 12 , Urban Estate , Karnal , Pin- 132001 .
32. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Barsat Road , V. & P.O. Noorwala,
33. Oriental Bank of Commerce , 3 , Prein Nagar , Ambala City .
9417
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
37. Oriental Bank of Commerce, New York Plaza, Opp . Judges Bunglow Bodakdev , Ahemdabad, Pin-380015 .
38. Oriental Bank of Commerce , G-2, Samedha, Near Associated Petrol pump , C.G. Road, Ahemdabad, Pin-380006
39. Oriental Bank of Commerce, First Floor , Manibhadra Complex, Rajasthan Hospital , Kamp Road , Shahi Bag . , Ahemdabad, pin- 380004.
40. Oriental Bank of Commerce, APM , Stopping Mall , Nr . Devpriya Bunglows , 100Ft . Satellite Road, Ahmedabad , Pin -380051.
41. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Nirman, Nr . Jyoti plaza, Shyamal Cross Road , Satellite Vejalpur, Ahmedabad , Pin - 380051 42. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Kendriya Vidyalaya, 13 ; Gandhar , Tower , ONGC Township , Ankleshwar , Pin- 393010 .
43. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Extension Counter , B/7/7/ 1 ,Ground Floor , Shashwat Hospital , Kothi Pole Raopura , Baroda, Pin-390001 .
44. Oriental Bank of Commerce , E.C. , E.M.E. Canteen, Fateh Ganj , Baroda, Pin-390008
45. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Shop No. 54 to 58. 1st floor , Rang Complex, Jhadeshwar Road , Bharuch .
46. Oriental Bank of Commerce , First Floor , Sardar Patel Vyapar , Sankul , Malgodown Road, Mehsana , Pin- 384002 .
47. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Patel House , Naranpur , Bhuj Distt. Kutchh , Pin -370429
48. Oriental Bank of Commerce , FirstFloor, Krishna Place, Panchavati Main Road , Rajkot, Pin - 360001 .
49. Oriental Bank of Commerce , UG- 1A to IC, Empire State Building , Ring Road, Surat, Pin -395002 .
50. Oriental Bank of Commerce , L-4 , Abhushan Complex, Ghod-dod Road, Surat, Pin - 395007
Gurgaon Region
34. Oriental Bank of Commerce , V. & P.O. Mehlanwali , Distt . Yamunanagar 35. Oriental Bank of Commerce , V. & P.O. Kala Amb , Tehsil Narayangarh, Distt . Ambala . ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Ahemdabad Region
36. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Plot No. 159/2/1 , Hotal Krishna , Opp. Hotal Natraj Naroli Road, Silvasa, Pin - 396230.
51. Oriental Bank of Commerce , S.C.O-69 , Huda Market Sector - 15, Faridabad , Pin- 121002
52. Oriental Bank of Commerce , S.C.F. - 46 , Part- II , Market , Sector- 19, Faridabad, Pin- 121002 .
53. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Jiva Public School , Sector- 21B , Faridabad, Pin - 121002.
9418
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
54. Oriental Bank of Commerce, 763/25, Basai Road, Gurgaon , Pin - 122001 .
55. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Tagore International School, DLF - III , Gurgaon, Pin -122001 .
56. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Fawarra Chowk, Gurgaon, Pin- 122001 .
57. Oriental Bank ofCommerce, Rao Ram Singh School , Vill . & P.O. Kanhai , Gurgaon, Pin- 122001 .
58. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Vanjya Nikunj Complex , H.S.1.D.C. Udyog Vihar , Phase IV, Gurgaon, Pin - 122001 .
59. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Rotary Public School , Sector -22 , Gurgaon , Pin-122001 .
60. Oriental Bank of Commerce, S.C.O. - 14 , HUDA Market, Sector- 15, Part- II , Gurgaon, Pin-122001.
61. Oriental Bank ofCommerce , S.C.O - 62 , HUDA Market, Sector - 17A, Gurgaon , Pin-122001.
62. Oriental Bank ofCommerce, PlotNo. 5, Sector -32 , Intitutional Area, Gurgaon, Pin-122001 .
63. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Ansal Institute of Technology, Sector -55 , Gurgaon, Pin-122001.
64. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Orchid Square, B- Block , Sushant Lok- I , Gurgaon , Pin-122001.
65. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Chirajiv Bharti School , C- Block, Sushant Lok - I , Gurgaon, Pin-122001 .
66. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Holy Child Public School , Riwari , Pin- 123401 .
67. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Chandravati Sr. Sec . School , Tauru , Distt . Mewat, Pin-122105.
68. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Stationery Godown, Neelam Chowk , N.I.T. Faridabad, Pin- 121102.
Rohtak Region
69 .. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Main Bazar, Julana, Distt. Jind , Pin - 125201 .
70. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Sector-95 , Police Line Area, Delhi Road , Hissar , Pin- 125001 .
71. Oriental Bank ofCommerce , Gurudwara Road, Sonipat, Pin- 131001.
72. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Vill . SarsaGhogra , P.O. Bamla, Teh . & Distt . Bhiwani , Pin- 124001 .
73. Oriental Bank of Commerce, C.R.Z. School, Sonepat Distt. Sonepat, Pin - 13.1001. 74. Oriental Bank ofCommerce, Vidya Devi Jindal School , Hissar, Distt. Hissar , Pin- 125001 .
75. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Ch .Devi Lal Memorial Trust, Barnala, Distt . Sirsa Pin-125055.
76. Oriental Bank ofCommerce, Govt . College, Hissar , Distt. Hissar , Pin -125001 .
77. Oriental Bank of Commerce, GatewayEducation & Charitablė , Society, Vill. Fazilpur, Distt. Sonepat
78. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Bhai Khemchand S.D. Girls Sec. School , Gurudwara P.D. Distt. Sonepat , Pin- 131001
79. Oriental Bank of Commerce , Sector- 13 , HudaComplex, Hissar , Distt. Hissar, Pin- 125001 .
80. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Huda Office , Sector - 1 , Urban Estate, Rohtak, Pin-124001.
81. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Vill.& P.O. Kisangarh, Tehsil Meham , Distt . Rohtak Pin- 124112 .
82. Oriental Bank of Commerce, B.D.P.O. Complex, Kharkhoda Road, Sampla, Distt. Rohtak .
83. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Memorial Hospital , Mamu Bhanja Chowk, Disst . Sonepat , Pin- 131001 .
84. Oriental Bank of Commerce, Mission Chowk, Rohtak Road , Distt . Sonepat , Pin-131001
85. Oriental Bank of Commerce, 31 , Miles Stone, Chopra Filling Station , Kundli, Distt. Sonepat, Pin - 131001
SYNDICATE BANK
Offical language Division Head Office : Manipal 1. Syndicate Bank, Area Colony Branch 1 G-3/360, Gulmohar , E- 8 Arera Colony, Bhopal , Distt. Bhopal , State Madhya Pradesh Pin-462039 .
2. Syndicate Bank, Hoshangabad Road Branch , Shikarvarta Complex, Bhopal, Distt . Bhopal , State Madhya Pradesh , Pin-462011
3. Syndicate Bank, Manavatha Nagar Branch , Columbia Convent School , Bicholi - Hapsi Road, Indore , Distt. Indore , State Madhya Pradesh , Pin -452016
4. Syndicate Bank , Jabalpur Sadar Cantonment Branch , St. Aloysius CollegeCompound Area, Penti Naka Jabalpur, Distt. Jabalpur, State Madhya Pradesh , Pin -482001 [ भाग II-खाण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5. Syndicate Bank, Gwalior City Centre Branch , Jeevan Prakash Building, Citi Centre, LIC of India D.O. Gwalior, Distt. Gwalior , State Madhya Pradesh, Pin -474011 6. SyndicateBank, St. Agnes College Branch , Bendoor, Distt . D.K. Pin-575002 Karnataka
7. Syndicate Bank, Bajpe Airport Branch, Bajpe, Distt . D.K.. Pin-574142, Karnataka
8. Syndicate Bank, NMPT Branch, Panambur , Mangalore, Distt . D.K. Pin-575010, State Karnataka .
9. Syndicate Bank, Chickmagatur STJ College Campus Branch , Belur Road, Distt. Chickmagalur, Pin -577101 , State Karnataka
10. Syndicate Bank , Vijaya College Branch , MULKI , Distt. D.K. , Pin-574154, State Karnataka .
11. Syndicate Bank, SDM Eye Hospital Branch , Lalbag , Mangalore , Distt. D.K. , State Karnataka Pin-575003.
12. Syndicate Bank, KVG Polytechnic Branch , Sullia, Distt . D.K. , State Karnataka , Pin-574239 .
13. Syndicate Bank, FatherMuller's Charitable , Institution Branch , Hospital Building Kankanady, Mangalore, D.K. Distt . Pin- 575002 State Karnataka,
14. Syndicate Bank , Sri Mahaveer College Branch , Moodabidri , Post Kodangallu, Karkala Taluk D.K. Distt . State Karnataka, Pin-574197 .
15. Syndicate Bank , ABSM ! Dental College Campus Branch , Belma Village, Nityanandanagar, Derlakatte, D.K. Distt . State Karnataka, Pin-575018 .
16. Syndicate Bank, Puttur Campco Chocolate Factory Branch , Kemminje, Darbe Puttur , D.K. , Distt . State Karnataka , Pin- 574202 .
17. Syndicate Bank , Mangalore Attavar Branch , Kasturba Medical College Campus , Attavar , Mangalore , D.K. , Distt . State Karnataka, Pin -575001 .
18. Syndicate Bank , Baluganj Branch , St. Georges College campus GardenRoad, Baluganj , Agra, Pin -282001 , U.P. 19. Syndicate Bank , Chippitola Branch , Ratan Sagar , No. 4, Dholpur House, Chippitola Crossing , Agra, Pin -282001 , U.P.
9419
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
20. Syndicate Bank, Baradwari Branch, Shri Uday Singh Jain College Campus , Aligarh, Pin-202001 , U.P.
21. Syndicate Bank, Ramghat Road Branch, Aligarh Development Authority Campus , Aligarh, Pin-202002, U.P. 22. Syndicate Bank , Zilla Panchayat Branch , Zilla Panchayat Building Collectorate Compound, Aligarh , Pin -202001 , U.P. 23. Syndicate Bank, V.C. Lodge Branch, Aligarh Muslim University Campus , Aligarh, Pin-202002, U.P.
24. Syndicate Bank, Vrindaban Road Branch , Methodist Hospital Jaisinghpura, Vrindaban Road, Mathura, Pin-281003 , U.P.
25. SyndicateBank, Chhibramau Branch , 12/73B , 1st Floor, Nagar palika Road, Chhibramau, Pin-209721 , Distt. Kannauj , U.P. 26. Syndicate Bank, Belekeri Branch, Krishna Nivas , 1st Floor , main Road, Belekeri , Distt. Uttara Kannada, State Karnataka, Pin- 581321
27. Syndicate Bank, CMC Sirsi Branch, City Municipal Council Munici- pal Complex, Market Road , Sirsi , Distt . Uttar Kannada, State Karnataka, Pin -581401 .
28. Syndicate Bank, Tattihali L. C. II Branch , Drepung Loseling Monastery Lama Camp II , P.O. Tibetan Colony Tq. Mundgod, Distt . Uttar Karnataka, Pin - 581411.
29. Syndicate Bank, Tattihali L. C. I Branch , Garden Lachi Monastery Lama Camp I , P.O. Tibetan Colony Tq. Mundgod, Distt. Uttar Kannada, State Karnataka, Pin-581411 .
30. Syndicate Bank, CDM Sainikpuri Branch , Sainikpuri , Secunderabad, Distt. Rangareddy, State Andhra Pradesh Pin-500094.
31. Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, 6-3-653 , Poineer House , Somajiguda, Hyderabad, State Andhra Pradesh , Pin-500082.
32. Syndicate Bank, Vasavi College ofEngineering Branch , 9-5-81 , Ibrahimbagh , Hyderabad , State Andhra Pradesh , Pin-500031.
33. Syndicate Bank , Devanahalli Branch , No. 117 , DB Cross Junction , B.B. Road , N H 7, Devanahalli , Bangalore Rural Distt. 562110, Karnataka.
34. Syndicate Bank, KempapuraBranch, No. 7 , Kempapura Main Road , Behind Astra Zenica, Bangalore 560024, Karnataka 9420
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
12. Sector 62- Noida Branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Plot No. C-54-40, Sector 62 , Dist . Gautam BuddhNagar, Noida-201 301 (Uttar Pradesh)
35. Syndicate Bank, Chickpet Branch, No. 682, Pathi Mansion , P.B. No. 7843, Chickpet, Bangalore-560053 .
36. Syndicate Bank ,
13. Sector 24 - Rohini Delhi Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, First Floor, Big Mega Mall CS /OCF No. 7, Sector 24, Rohini , New Delhi- 110085
Sanjaynagar Branch, No. 158 , AECS Layout , Sanjaynagar Main Road, Sanjaynagar, Bangalore- 560094, Karnataka.
37. Syndicate Bank,
14. Rajouri Garden Delhi Branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Ground Floor , J- 8 /77 G, Nehru Market Rajouri Garden, New Delhi - 110027
National Games Village Branch , B - 1-20 , Sharavathy Block, National Games Village , Koramangala, Bangalore- 560047, Karnataka.
15. Bhilwada Branch, Bank of Maharashtra , First Floor, 8- L- 1 , R.C. Vyas Colony, Bhilwada- 311001 (Rajsthan)
38. Syndicate Bank,
Motilal Nehru Ward palace Road Branch, Jagdalpur , Distt. Bastar , Chhattisgarh State , Pin -494001 .
16. Sector -40 Gurgaon Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, SCO-86, District Shopping Centre Sector-56, Gurgaon - 122001 (Haryana)
StateBank ofTravancore Zonal Office
P.B. No. 25 , Maniyattukudi Afsa Building, Mavoor Road, Kozhikode, Kerala-673004
17. Vaishalinagar Jaipur Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Ground Floor, Plot No. 3 , Pratapnagar Khatipura Road, Vaishalinagar, Jaipur , 302012 (Rajsthan) Bank of Maharashtra
(C.O. Lokmangal , 1501 , Shivajinagar, Pune 411005 )
18. Banswara Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Abhinandan Complex Dahod Road, Banswara - 327001 (Rajsthan)
"A Region"
19. Pitampura Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Ground Floor, K.P.27, Community Centre, Pitampura, New Delhi- 110034
1. Palam Vihar Branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Chiranjiv Bharati School Compound, F Block, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon - 122017 (Haryana)
2. Yamunagar Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Jagdhari Road, Near Lal Dwara Yamunagar - 135001 (Haryana)
20. Mayur Vihar Phase III Delhi Branch, Bank of Maharashtra , First Floor , F -28 to F- 30 , Hall No. 4, CSC - II , Kondhali Gharoli Mayur Vihar , Phase III , New Delhi - 110096
3. Haridwar Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , 42 , Vivek ViharHaridwar-249407 (Uttaranchal )
21. Dhanbad Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Ground Floor, Main Road Sawaidhela, Dhanbad- 826 001 (Zarkhand)
"B Region"
4. Vasant Kunj Delhi Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Ground Floor, OES Bldg . Plot No. 11 LSC , Sector B - 1 Vasant Kunj , New Delhi - 110070
22. Gurdaspur Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Near Post OfficeChowk, Jail Road, Gurdaspur- 143 251 (Punjab ) 5. Sri Shankarayacharya College of Engineering Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Sri Shankaracharya College of Engineering and Technology Campus Bhilai , Dist . Durg-490 020 (Chattisgarh)
23. Pathankot Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , SCF No. 7 , Block-B Improvement Trust Complex, Patel Chowk Pathankot- 145 001 (Punjab)
6. Firozabad Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, 31 , Monapuram, Ganesh Nagar Opp. CLL . Jain Degree College Firozabad- 283 203 (Uttar Pradesh)
24. Ruparel College Campus Mumbai Branch, Bank ofMaharashtra , Ruparel College Campus , Bal Govinddas Marg Matunga (West) , Mumbai -400 016 (Maharashtra)
7. Deori Road Agra Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , 27 Defence Estate , Phase- 1 , Deori Road , Agra - 282 001 (UttarPradesh)
25. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation , Nagpur Branch, Bank of Maharashtra , VICD, Sinchan Seva Bhavan Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440.001 (Maharashtra)
8. East Katchahari Road Meerut Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , East Katchahari Road, NAS College Meerut-250 001 (Uttar Pradesh)
26. NMMT Turbhe Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , New Mumbai Municipal Transport Bus Depot Sector 23 , Turbhe, New Mumbai -400 075 (Maharashtra) 9. Ujjain Charitable Trust Hospital Research Centre Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , UJCT & Hospital Research Center, Ankpat Road, Budhwaria Ujjain-456 006 (Madhya Pradesh)
27. Town Centre Aurangabad Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Town Centre , Aurangabad-431003 (Maharashtra)
10. Indirapuram Ghaziabad Branch, Bank of Maharashtra , Plot No. 1/3 , Vaibhav Khand , Block-D Amrapali Green Appartments Indirapuram Ghaziabad-201010 (Uttar Pradesh )
28. Modern College Pune Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Modern College Road, Final Plot No. 875/CTS No. 1186/A Shivajinagar , Pune-411005 (Maharashtra)
29. Sant Gadgebaba Amraoti University Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Sant Gadgebaba Amraoti University, Amraoti - 444620 (Maharashtra)
11. Palval Branch , Bank of Maharashtra , Om Bhatia Co. Opp . Old Truck Union, Near Haryana Agro Industries , Railway Road, Palval - 121 102 (Haryana) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
9421
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26; 1929
30. Ganpatipule Branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Tapasvi , Sadanand Niwas , House No. 100 ( 1 ) Survey No. 33A- 1A Ganpatipule -416-402, Dist. Ratnagiri (Maharashtra)
31. Vimannagar Pune Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Shop No. 1 and 2, Lalwani Residency Survey No. 33 , Hissa No. 1, Vimannagar, Pune 411014 (Maharashtra)
32. Baner Pune Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Showroom No. 2 Kapil Classic , Ground Floor Survey No. 288 / 1A/ 1 , Baner Pune 411008 (Maharashtra) 33. Warje Pune Branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Fly View Residency, Shop No. 1-6 , Survey No. 129 , Hissa No. 9-10, Warje Pune 411 025 (Maharashtra) 34. Pune University Campus Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, Near Main Building, Administrative Block Pune University Campus Pune 411 005 (Maharashtra)
35. Pune Circle Office, Bank of Maharashtra , F.C. Road , Shivajinagar Pune 411005 (Maharashtra) 36. Nagpur Circle Office , Bank of Maharashtra , Mahabank Bhawan , Abhyankar Marg, Sitaburdi Nagpur 440012 ( Maharashtra)
37. Ramkrishna Math Pune Branch , Bank of Maharashtra, 131 / 1A, Vitthalwadi Road, Near Dandekar Bridge Pune 411030 ( Maharashtra) 38. Yashwantagar Nagpur Branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Dharampeth Arts and Science College Dharampeth , Nagpur (Maharashtra)
Punjab National Bank
1. Punjab National Bank Branch Office : Bye Pass Solan, Distt. Solan ( H.P.) Pincode - 173212
ANNEXURE A
2. Punjab National Bank Branch Office : T.C.V. Dal District: Kangra (Himachal Pradesh ) Pin- 176216 Phone 01892-221214
Punjab National Bank
एकीकृत अंचल कार्यालय 10-अशोक मार्ग , लखनऊ
New branches to be notified under Official Languages Rule 10(4)
F-16 3. Punjab National Bank BO : Jais (4495) Post. Jais Distt. Raiberali (UP)
4. Punjab National Bank BO : Tiloi (4505) Post-Tiloi Distt . Raiberali (UP)
5. Punjab National Bank Branch Office Main Bazar, PinjoreDist . Panchkula (Haryana)
6. Punjab National Bank Branch Office Modern Housing ComplexManimajara, Chandigarh
Addresses of Branches/Offices of Punjab National under Regional Office, Trivandrum (Kerala) for Notification under Rule 10(4) ofthe Official Language Rules , 1976.
7. Kumbanad Distt. Pathanamthitta Pin -689547 8. Temple Shopping Complex. Oachira Distt. Kollam-690526.
9. Trichur- Palace Road, Kerala-680020.
10. Office/Branch Name: Punjab National Bank Gandhi Nagar , Pur Road, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) Pin-311001
11. Punjab National Bank Branch Office First Floor , SuperPlaza Sandesh Press Road, Badakdev Ahmedabad- 380015
12. Punjab National Bank Branch Office Ground Floor , SarjanTower Opp : Janta Nagar 100 Feet Ring Road, Chandkedha Ahmedabad- 382424
13. Punjab National Bank Branch Office First Floor , Jaylaxmi Building Udhna Main Road Surat -39510 14. Punjab National Bank, Branch Office , Jalseva BhavanSector- 10A Gandhinagar-382010
15. Punjab National Bank, Branch Office , 255 , Kalpna Society Opp : Shrirang Vidhyalaya Vaghodia Road Vadodara- 390019
16. Punjab National Bank, Branch Office , City light Complex Dumas Road, Surat - 395007
17. Punjab National Bank, Branch Office , Narnarayan Complex, Navavas Madhapar (Kutch)-370020 18. Punjab National Bank, Branch Office , R. K. Nagar , Virani Chowk, Rajkot-360001
19. Punjab National Bank, B.O.-M.L.B. Medical College , Jhansi D. No. -4602, Kanpur Road, Jhansi (U.P. ) Pin-284128 (Ph . No. 0510-2320780)
20. D.M. College, Hissar Punjab National Bank Branch Office D.M. College, Hissar- 125001 Distt. Hissar (Haryana)
21. Municipal Committee, Hisar Punjab National Bank Branch Office Municipal Committee, Hissar- 125001 Distt. Hissar (Haryana)
22. GJU, Hissar Punjab National Bank Branch Office Guru Jambheshwar University , Hissar Distt . Hissar (Haryana)
23. RCC Hissar Punjab National Branch Office Regional Clearing Centre, Hissar - 125001 Distt . Hissar (Haryana)
24. Rania Punjab National Bank Branch Office VPO Rania, Distt . Sirsa- 125055 (Haryana)
25. Barnala Road, Sirsa Punjab National Bank Branch Office Barnala Road, Sirsa- 125055 Distt . Sirsa (Haryana) 9422
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
22. DO, Mysore
23 . DO, Nellore
26. MM . College, Fatehabad Punjab National Bank Brach Office M.M. College , Fatehabad- 125050 Distt. Fatehabad (Haryana)
24. DO, Rajahmundary
25 . DO , Raichur
26. DO, Secunderabad
27. SD Modem School , Panipat Punjab National Bank BranchOffice SD Modern School , Panipat Distt. Panipat (Haryana)
27. DO, Udupi
28 . DO, Visakhapatnam
28. BMIT Panipat Punjab National Bank Branch Office BMIT, Sonepat Distt. Panipat ( Haryana)
29. DO, Warangal
Southern Zone:
29. Hyderabadi Hospital, Panipat Punjab National Bank BranchOffice Hyderabadi Hospital , Panipat Distt. Panipat (Haryana)
30. ZO, Chennai
31. DO, Chennai - I
30. Matlauda Punjab National Bank Branch Office VPO Matlauda Distt . Sonipat (Haryana )
32. DO , Chennai -II
Darbhanga
33. DO, Vellore
34. DO, Salem
31. Punjab National Bank C.M. College Campus Kilaghat, Darbhanga Pin - 846004
35 . DO, Coimbatore
36. DO, Madurai
32. Punjab National Bank Marwari College Campus Gangasagar , Darbhanga Pin - 846004
37. DO , Thanjavur
38. DO, Tirunelveli
33. Punjab National Bank Rajendra Agricultural University Pusa , Distt .: Samastipur Pin - 848101
39. DO, Kozhikode :
40. DO, Ernakulam
}
41. DO , Kottayam
01. General Insurance Corporation of India 5, Parliament Street , Jeevan Ţara Building , NewDelhi - 110001
:
42. DO , Thiruvananthapuram
Northern Zone:
List ofNames of ZOS/DOs left for Notification
43. DO, Srinagar
Eastern Zone:
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited 1. ZO , Kolkata
Regional Office Chandigarh and its Subordinate Offices 2. DO, Asanol
1.. Direct Agent Branch Chandigrah
3. DO, Berhampur
2. Branch Office - 3 , Amritsar
4. DO, Bongaigon
5. KMDO+ 1
3. Branch Office- 3 , Jalandhar
4. DivisionalOffice-3 - Amritsar
6. KMDO II
7. KSDO
Mumbai Regional Office- 2 and its Subordinate Offices 8. DO, Katak
5. Regional Office- 2 , Mumbai
6. Divisional Office- 8 , Mumbai
9. DO, Guwahati
10. DO , Howrah
7. Divisional Office-20, Mumbai
8. Divisional Office Kalyan , Mumbai
11. DO, Jalpaiguri
Divisional Office Borivali , Mumbai 9.
12. DO, Jorhat
10. Branch Office-2,Mumbai
13. DO, Sambalpur
11. Branch Office Diamond, Mumbai
14. DO , Silchar
South-Central Zone:
12. Branch Office Mahim , Mumbai
13. Branch Office Jogeshavari , Mumbai
15. ZO, Hyderabad
14. Branch Office Thane , Mumbaj
16. DO, Bangalore- I
17. DO, Bangalore- II
15. Branch Office Belapur, Mumbai
1. Divisional Office -21
18. DO, Belgaum
i
2. Divisional Office-23
19. DO, Hyderabad
3. Divisional Office-Noida
20. DO, Karimnagar
4. Divisional Office -Paschim Vihar .
21. DO, Machilipatnam 9423 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2007
ofDirectors of Oriental Bank of commerce for a period of three yearsfrom the date of notification or until further orders, whichever is earlier .
[F. No. 9/22/2006-BO- 1] G.B. SINGH, Dy. Secy
नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर , 2007
का. आ. 3296. - राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एंव प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एंव अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) ( ज) एंव ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा श्री टी परमेश्वर राव , निवासी मकान न. 7-5-34 , एम. एम. रोड, लॉयर पैट, अंगोल , प्रकाशम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश -523002 को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो , बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के निदेशक बोर्ड में अंशकालिक गैर सरकारी निदेशक के पद पर नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/22/2006-बी ओ- I ]
जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th November , 2007
का. आ. 3298.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949(1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए. केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर एतद्द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग ) के उपखंड ( i ) के उपबंध पंजाब नैशनल बैंक पर उस सीमा तक लागू नही होंगे , जहां तक इसका संबंध पंजाब नैशनल बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक डॉ. के. सी. चक्रवर्ती को ( i ) बैंकिंग कार्मिक चयन संस्थान के शासी बोर्ड ( आईबीपीएस ) , ( ii ) पीएनबी गिल्ट्स लि. का निदेशक पद , ( iii ) वित्त एवं नियंत्रण कार्यक्रम सलाहकार बोर्ड तथा ( iv ) भारतीय बैंकिग एवं वित्त सस्थान , मुम्बई की शासी परिषद का निदेशक पद प्राप्त करने से संबंध है , पर लागू नही होंगे ।
[फा. सं. 20/5/2004-बी ओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव
New Delhi , the 14th November , 2007 S. O. 3296.- In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub - Section 3 (h) and (3 - A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalized Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri T. Parameswar Rao , resident of H. No. 7-5-34 , M. M. Road , Lawyer Pet, Ongole - 523 002 Prakasam District , A. P. as part - time non - official Director on the Board of Directors of Bank of Maharashtra for a period of three years from the date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[ F. No. 9/22 /2006-BO- I ]
G. B. SINGH,Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2007
S. O. 3298.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 of the Bnking Regulation Act, 1949( 10 of 1949) , the Government of India on the recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India , hereby declare that the provisions of sub - clause ( i ) of clause (c ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the said Act shall not apply to Punjab National Bank in so far as it relates to taking up Directorship of Dr. K. C. Chakraborty , Chairman & Managing Director , Punjab National Bank on ( i ) the Governing Board of Institute of Banking Personnel Selection ( IBPS ) , ( II ) Directorship of PNB Gilsts Ltd. (iii ) Advisory Board of Finance and Control Programme , and ( iv) the Governing Council of Indian Institute ofBanking and Finance , Mumbai .
[F. No. 20/5 /2004- BO- 1 ]
G. B. SINGH , Dy . Secy
राजस्व विभाग नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
का. आ. 3297. - राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रंबध एंव प्रकीर्ण उपबंध )स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एंव अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) ( ज) एंव ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा श्री विजय जागीरदार एंव डा. राधेश्याम महर्षि को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो , आरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कामर्स के निदेशक बोर्ड में अंशकालिक गैर सरकारी निदेशक के पद पर नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/22/2006- बी ओ -1 ]
जी. बी. सिंह ,उप सचिव
का. आ. 3299 ,-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में राजस्व विभाग के अधीन केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है:-
New Delhi , the 13th November , 2007
आयुक्त,
केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, सीमा शुल्क एवं सेवा कर 9/86ए, अमरावति नगर ,
वेस्ट चर्च कम्पाउंड,
तिरूपति-517501
S. O. 3297. -In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- Section 3 (h ) and ( 3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act , 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalized Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Vijay Jagirdar and Dr. Radhey Shyam Maharshi as part - time non - official Director on the Board
[फा. सं. 11013 (01 ) 2005- हिन्दी . 2 ] मधु शर्मा, निदेशक ( रा. भा. ) 4506G1/07-5 9424
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (Department of Revenue) New Delhi , the 24th October, 2007
( ii) " डी सी एच " एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह एम.एल.बी. मेडिकल कालेज , झांसी द्वारा मई 1982 के बजाय 1981 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ।
[यू..- 12012/10/2007 - एम ई ( पी. II ) पार्ट ]
एस. के. मिश्रा , अवर सचिव S. O. 3299.-In pursunce of Sub -rule (4) ofrule 10 ofthe Official Language . ( Use for Officials purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby noti- fies the following office under the Central Board ofExcise &Customs, Department of Revenue , the 80% staff whereof have acquired the working knowlledge Hindi .
पाद टिप्पण : दिनांक 30-4-2001 की मूल अधिसूचना सं. वी. 11015/3/2001 - एम ई ( नीति-1 ) भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II खण्ड 3 में 29 मई 2003 को प्रकाशित हुई थी।
Commissioner Central Excise , Customs & Service Tax, 9/86, Amravathi Nagar , West Church Compound, Tirupati-517501
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE) CORRIGENDUM
[F. No. 11013 (01 )/2005- Hindi -2 ] MADHU SHARMA, Director (OL)
NewDelhi , the 5th, October, 2007
वाणिज्य एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय (वाणिज्य विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 1 नवम्बर , 2007
S. O. 3301.- In partial modification to this Department's Notification No. V. - 11015/3/2001 -ME (Policy-I) dated 30thApril, 2001 the entry against the " Bundelkhand University " in column 3 may be read as under:
(i) "MD (Paediatrics ) " shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by M.L.B. Medical College, Jhansi on or after 1982 instead of from May , 1983 .
(ii) "DCH" shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by M.L.B. Medical College , Jhansi on or after 1981 instead of from May, 1982.
का. आ. 3300.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ,राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में वाणिज्यविभाग के संबद्ध कार्यालय विदेश व्यापार महानिदेशालय , नई दिल्ली के अंतर्गत कोचीन स्थित संयुक्त महानिदेशक, विदेश व्यापार का कार्यालय , चित्तर रोड , कोच्ची-11 को अधिसूचित करती है , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है ।
[U. - 12012/ 10/2007-MF(P.II) pt. ] S.K. MISHRA , Under Secy.
[सं. ई. 11013 (1 ) -2004- हिन्दी] एल. पी. सैनी , निदेशक
Foot Note : The principal notification No. V. 11015/3 /2001- ME(Policy- 1 ) dated 30-4-2001 published in Part II Section 3 ofGazette of India on 29th May, 2003 .
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department ofCommerce)
NewDelhi, the 1st November, 2007
नई दिल्ली, 11 अक्तूबर , 2007
का. आ. 3302.- केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद अधि-नियम 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 20 की उपधारा ( ii) के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा स्नातकोर चिकित्सा शिक्षा समिति का गठन करती है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित सदस्य शामिल हैं , अर्थात्ः-
केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित सदस्य
S. O. 3300.- In pursunce of Sub -rule (4) of rule 10 of the Officail Language (Use for official purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Govt . hereby notifies the office of Joint Director General , of Foreign Trade , Chittor Road, Cochi - 11 under the Directorate General of Foreign Trade, New Delhi , an attached office of Department of Commerce, whereof more than 80% satff have acquired a working knowledge of Hinde.
1. प्रो. ए. राजशेखरण
' अर्जुन '
[No. E. - 11013 (1 )-2004- Hindi] L. P. SAINI , Director
स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )
न्यूनं. 70 , फर्स्ट एवेन्यु, इंदिरा नगर, चेन्नई-60020 (तमिलनाडु)
शुद्धिपत्र
2. डा. हरेश पुरूषोत्तमदास भालोदिया ,
नई दिल्ली , 5 अक्तूबर , 2007
प्रो. और अध्यक्ष , अस्थिविज्ञान विभाग यूनिट, बी.जे. मेडिकल कालेज एंड सिविल हास्पिटल , अहमदाबाद ( गुजरात)
3. डा. भानु प्रकाश दुबे ,
का. आ. 3301.- इस विभाग की दिनांक 30 अप्रैल , 2001 की अधूिचना सं. बी. 11015/3/2001 - एम ई ( नीति -1 ) के आंशिक संशोधन में स्तम्भ 3 में " बुंदेलखण्ड विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने की प्रविष्टि को निम्न रूप में पढ़ा जाए :
एम डी, डी एफ एम , जे आस्- एम आई जी-1 , अंकुर कालोनी , शिवाजी नगर, भोपाल ( मध्य प्रदेश )
(i ) " एम डी ( बाल चिकित्सा ) " एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह एम.एल.बी. मेडिकल कालेज , झांसी द्वारा मई 1983 के बजाय 1982 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो। ['भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9425 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
6. Dr. D.K. Sharma, C-9 , Shastri Nagar, Meerut-250004 (UttarPradesh)
4. डा. इंद्रजीत रे , पी/17 , साउथ एंड गार्डन पी.ओ. गरिया कोलकाता-700084 (पश्चिम बंगाल)
[No. V. 11013/5/2001 -ME ( P - I ) ] T.J.S. CHAWLA, Under Secy.
दंत चिकित्सा शिक्षा अनुभाग नई दिल्ली , 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
5. डा. रानो भाष्करण प्रोफेसर एंड हैड ( अवकाश प्राप्त) , डिपार्ट आफ न्यूरोलाजी.. मेडिकल कालेज , त्रिवेन्द्रम, करेल
6. डा. डी.के. शर्मा
सी-9 , शास्त्री नगर , मेरठ-250004 (उत्तर प्रदेश)
का. आ. 3303.- केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 के कॉलम । में क्रम संख्या 51 के सामने मौजूदा प्रविष्टि में निम्नलिखित संशोधन तुरंत प्रभाव से करती है , अर्थात्: -
[सं.वी. 11013/5/2001- एम ई ( पी-1 ) ]
टी.जे.एस. चावला, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 11th, October, 2007
" SI . श्री राम चन्द्र मेडिकल कालेज एंड रिसर्च इंस्टीटयूट (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई ( तमिलनाडु ) के नाम को एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित के रूप में प्रतिस्थापित किया जायेगा:-
" श्री रामचन्द्र विश्वविद्यालय , पाउरूर , चैन्नई (दिनांक 29-9-1994 की अधिसूचना संख्या एफ. 9-15/93 यू के तहत विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग अधिनियम , 1956 की धारा 3 के अधीन स्थापित) । "
S. O. 3302.- In pursuance of sub- section ( ii ) of Section 20 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government hereby constitutes the Post -Graduate Medical Education Commitee consisting of the following members , namely :-
Nominated by the Central Government
1. Prof. A. Rajasekaran
2. यह संशोधन विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग की दिनांक 13-9-2006 की अधिसूचना संख्या एफ- 6-1 ( 11 ) /2006 (सीपीपी- 1) के अनुसरण में किया गया है ।
[सं. फा. वी-12017/2/98 -डीई ] राज सिंह, अवर सचिव 'Arjuna' New No. 70 , First Avenue , Indira Nagar, Chennai - 600020 (TamilNadu)
Dental Education Section
2. Dr. Haresh Purushottamdas Bhalodiya
New Delhi , the 24th , October , 2007
Prof. and Head of Unit , Orthopaedic Department B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital Ahmedabad (Gujarat )
S. O. 3303. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of Section 10 ofthe Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India . hereby makes the following amendments in the existing entry of Column I against Serial No. 51 of Part- 1 of the Schedule to the Dentist Act , 1948 (16 of 1948) with immediate effect namely:----
3. Dr. Bhanu Prakash Dubey MD, DFM, 1 Jr. MIG - 1 , Ankur Colony . Shivaji Nagar , Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh)
" 51 The name' Sri Rarnachandra Medical College & Research Institute ( Deemed University) Chennai ( T.N. )' is hereby substituted as : ----
"Sri Ramachandra University, Pourur , Chennai (Established under Section 3 of UGC Act , 1956 vide notification No.F.9-15/93U dated 29-9-1994 ) . "
4. Dr. Indrajit Ray, P/ 17 , South End Garden , P.O. Garia, Kolkata -700084 (West Bengal)
2. This amendment is being made in pursuance of University Grants Commission's Notification No.F- 6-1 ( 11 ) / 2006( CPP - 1 ) dated 13-9-2006 .
5. Dr. Rani Bhaskaran Professor & Head (Retd. ), Deptt. of Neurology , Medical College , Trivandrum , Kerala .
[No. F. V. 12017/2/98 -DE ] RAJ SINGH, Under Seey.
1426
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3305.- दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची के भाग- I में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्ः-
का. आ. 3304.- दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का16 ) की धारा 16 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्मलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -
2. बाबा फरीद स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , फरीदकोट ( पंजाब ) के संबंध में दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 53 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में श्री गुरु राम दास इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेंटल साइंसेज एंड रिसर्च, अमृतसर के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी:-
2. राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय ( आरजीयूओएचएस ) , बंगलौर के संबंध में दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 49 के सामने स्तभ्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में एएमई इंटल कालेज एवं अस्पताल , रायचूर के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां खोजाएंगी:-
XXXII एएमई डेंटल कालेज एवं अस्पताल , रायचूर " मास्टर
III. श्री गुरु राम दास इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेंटल साइंसेज एंड रिसर्च, अमृतसर
फडेंटल सर्जरी
"मास्टर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी
कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री
एम.डी.एस. (ओरल एंड एम डी. एस. ( कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री)
(i ) ओरल एंड मैक्सिलोफेसियल सर्जरी
मैक्सिलोफेसियल सर्जरी ) 100-2006 को
राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलौर "
।१६ के बाद प्रदान
(यदि यह 23-5-2007 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)
बाबा फरीद स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , फरीदकोट (पंजाब ) । "
सख्या की. - 12017/33/2000 -पी.एम.एस. (डीई) ]
[संख्या वी. - 12017/1/2004-(डीई ) ]
राज सिंह , अवर सचिव
राज सिंह , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 24th, October, 2007
New Delhi , the 24th ; October , 2007 S.O. 3304.- In exercise ofthe powers conferred by
section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948
f1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation
1- frental Council of India , hereby makes the following
leadments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act,
S.O. 3305.-In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
1dNo. 49, in part - 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act,
2816 of 1948 ) pertaining to , Rajiv Gandhi University of juth Sdences ( RGUOHS ) , Bangalore , the following
2 In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against ties in irespect of AME's Dental College & Hospital , shaft be inserted thereunder :--
2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 53 , in part - I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) pertaining to , Baba Farid University of Health Sciences Faridkot (Punjab ), the following entries inrespect of Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences & Research , Amritsar , shall be inserted thereunder :-
ΠΙ . Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences & Research , Amritsar
AKAME's Dental College & Hospital , chur
"Master of Dental Surgery
Master of Dental Surgery
(i) Oral & Maxillofacial
Conservative Dentistry MDS(Con. Dentistry)
MDS (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery)
We granted on or
Rey 15-10-2006)
Surgery (When granted on or after23-5-2007)
RajivGandhi University of Health Sciences , Bangalore."
Baba Farid University of Health Sciences , Faridkot (Punjab) . "
[F. No. V- 12017/33/2000- PMS(DE) ]
[F. No. V- 12017/ 1 /2004-( DE) ] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.
RAJ SINGH , Under Secy .
9427
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )
भारतीय मानक व्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 30 अक्तूबर , 2007
का. आ. 3306.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है : -
अनुसूची
स्थापिंत तिथि क्रम संख्या
स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(3)
(2)
(4) (1)
1.
सितम्बर , 2007 SP 63 : 2007 आई एस/आई एस ओ 9001 : 2000 पर विवरणात्मक मार्गदर्शिका
(पहला पुनरीक्षण)
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , १, वहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदरावाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में विक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भः एम एस डी/जी -8 ] तिथि: 30.10.2007
पी. भटनागर , वैज्ञा. ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( प्रबन्ध एवं तंत्र) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs )
Bureau of Indian Standards
New Delhi , the 30th October , 2007
S. O. 3306. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Si No.
Date of Established No. and Year of the Indian Standards Established
No. and year of the Indian standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
September , 2007 1. SP 63 : 2007 Explanatory
Guide on IS/ ISO
9001:2000
(First Revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and its Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref.: MSD/G-8 ] Date:30-10-2007
P. BHATNAGAR, SCIENTIST ' E ' & Head ( MSD) 9428
[PART -II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2007
का. आ. 3307.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है : -
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि
क्रम संख्या
स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
30सितम्बर , 2007
आई एस 15451 : 2004 विस्फोटी गैस पर्यावरणों के लिए बिजली के उपकरण भाग 18 सम्पुटन " एम"
आई एस 60079-18 : 2004 विस्फोटी गैस पर्यावरणों के लिए बिजली के उपकरण भाग 18 सम्पुटन " एम " संरक्षण श्रेणी के विद्युत उपकरणों का निर्माण , परीक्षण और टाइप की मार्किंग
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भ: ईटी/22/टी-50 ] तिथि: 31-10-2007
पी.के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञा. ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2007
S. O. 3307. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Date of Established Sl . No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards
No. and year of the Indian standards, if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
30th September , 2007 IS 15451 : 2004 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres- Encapsulation " m "
1. IS/IEC60079-18 : 2004 Electrical Apparatus for explosive gas Atmospheres Part 18 Construction , test and marking of type of protection encapsulation " m " electrical apparatus
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
Date : 31-10-2007
[ Ref.: ET 22/T- 50 ]
P.K. MUKHERJEE , SCIENTIST ' F ' & Head ( Electrical Tech. ) 9429 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2007
का. आ. 3308.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है वे स्थापित ही गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों)
स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1 .
अगस्त, 2007 आई एस/ आई ई सी 60958-1 : 2004 अंकीय श्रव्य अन्तर्गुष्ठ- भाग । सामान्य
2.
अगस्त, 2007 आई एस/आई ई सी 60958-4 : 2004 अंकीय श्रव्य अन्तर्गुष्ठ - भाग 4 व्यवसायिक
अनुप्रयोग (टी ए 4 )
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भः एल टी डी/जी-75 ]
लक्षमण स्वरूप , कृते प्रमुख ( एल आई टी डी )
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2007
S. O. 3308.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
€
Sl . No.
Date of Establishment No. and Year of the Indian Standards
No. and year of the Indian standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1. IS/IEC 60958-1 : 2004
August , 2007 Digital Audio Interface Part1 General
2. IS /IEC 60958-4 : 2004
August , 2007 Digital Audio Interface Part 4 Professional Applications (TA4)
Copy of thisStandard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Fatna . Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref.: LTD/G- 75]
LAXMAN SAROOUP, For Head ( LITD) [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 9430
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/ KARTIKA 26, 1929
नई दिल्ली , 1 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3309.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरणा में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह वे स्थापित हो गया है :-
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
क्रम संख्या
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(3)
(4)
(2)
(1)
30सितम्बर 2007 1
:
आईएस/आईसी60320-2-3 1998 घरेलू और ऐसे ही सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए साधित्र युग्मक भाग 2-3 युग्मक आई पी एक्स शून्य से अधिक की सुरक्षा कोटी के साथ साधिन्न युग्मक
इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: ईटी 14/टी-82 ]
पी.के. मुखर्जी , वैज्ञा. ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )
New Delhi , the 1st November, 2007
S.O. 3309. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 )of rule ( 1 ) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards
Date of Established No.
No. & Year of the Indian Standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(4)
(3)
(1)
(2)
30September 2007 1 IS/IEC 60320-2-3 : 1998 Appliance couplers for household and similar general purposes Part 2-3 Appliance couplers with a degree of protection higher than IPX0
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref: ET 14/T - 82]
P.K. Mukherjee , Scientist ' F ' & Head (Electrical Tech. )
नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3310.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए है : -
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
क्रम संख्या
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(4)
(3)
(2)
( 1)
30 सितम्बर 2007 1 आईएस/आईएसओ 509: 1996 ( अतिक्रमित आईएस 5007 : 1988 ) हैंड पैलट ट्रक आयाम
आईएस 5007 : 1988 ) आईएस ओ/ आर 509 : 1966 हैंड पैलट ट्रक का आयाम (प्रथम पुनरीक्षण) 9431 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
30 सितम्बर 2007 2 आईएस/आईएस ओ 2953 : 1999 ( अतिक्रमित आईएस 13277 : 1992 ) यांत्रिक कंपन संतुलन मशीनें-विवरण और मूल्यांकन
आईएस 13277 : 1992 ) आईएस ओ/ 2953: 1985 संतुलन मशीनें-विवरण और मूल्यांकन
30 सितम्बर 2007 3 आईएस/ आईएस ओ 6750 2005 ( अतिक्रमित आईएस 10280: 1993 ) मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी प्रचालक का मैनुअल विषय और प्रारूप
आईएस 10280 : 1993 ) आईएस ओ/ 6750: 1984 मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी प्रचालक और रख- रखाव-मैनुअल का. विषय और प्रारूप ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण )
30 सितम्बर 2007 4 आईएस/आईएस ओ 6954 : 2000 ( अतिक्रमित आईएस 14733 : 1999 ) यांत्रिक कंपन यात्री और व्यापारिक जलपोत पर रहने संबंधी कंपन का मापन, रियोटिंग और मूल्यांकन
आईएस 14733 : 1999 ) आईएस ओ 6954 : 1984 यांत्रिक कंपन और प्रधात व्यापारिक जहाजों में कंपन के समग्र मूल्यांकन की मार्गदर्शिका
30सितम्बर 2007
आईएस 11327 : 1985 ) रेफ्रिजरेटर द्रवण इकाइयों की अपेक्षाएं
5 आईएस 11327 : 2007 रेफ्रिजरेटर द्रवण इकाइयों की अपेक्षाएं ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)
30सितम्बर 2007 6 आईएस/ आईएस ओ 2631-2: 2003 (अतिक्रमित आईएस) 13276 ( भाग 2 ) : 1992 यांत्रिक कंपन और शार्क मानक के पूरे शरीर पर कंपन में प्रभाव का मूल्यांकन भाग 2 भवनों में कंपन ( 1 हर्टज से 80 हर्टज )
आईएस 13276 ( भाग 2 ) : 1992/ आईएस ओ/2631-2 : 1989 मानक शरीर के पूर्णांग विकंपन का मूल्यांकन भाग 2 इमारतों में सतत और प्रधाती विकंपन ( 1 हर्टज से 80 हर्टज )
30सितम्बर 2007 7 आईएस/ आईएस ओ 3449-: 2005 मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी - गिरती वस्तुओं से सुरक्षा की संरचनाएं- प्रयोगशाला परीक्षण और कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं
आईएस 13769 : 1993/ आईएस ओ 3449 1992 मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी गिरती वस्तुओं से सुरक्षा की संरचनाएं- प्रयोगशाला परीक्षण और कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ : एम.ई.डी./जी-2: 1 ]
सी.के. वेदा, वैज्ञा. एफ . एवं प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजी. )
New Delhi , the 5th November, 2007
S.O. 3310.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each: SCHEDULE
SI . No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established
No.
Dateof Established
No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards , if any, Superseded bythe New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
30September 2007 IS/ISO 509 : 1996 ( Superseding IS 5007 : 1988) Hand pallet trucks-Dimensions
IS 5007 : 1988/ISO/ R 509 : 1966 Dimension for hand pallet trucks (FirstRevision)
2
30September 2007 IS/ISO 2953 : 1999 (Superseding IS 13277 : 1982) Mechanical vibration-Balancing machines-Description and evaluation
IS 13277 : 1992/ISO 2953 : 1985 Balancing machine-Description and evaluation
4506GI/07-6 9432
[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
(1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
IS 10280 : 1993/ISO 6754: 1984 30 September 2007 3 IS/ISO 6750 : 2005 Earth- moving machinery-operator's manual content and format
Earth-moving machinery- operation and maintenance- Formatand content of manuals (firstrevision)
IS14733 : 1999/ISO6954 : 1984 | 30 September2007
Mechanical vibration and shock- Guidelines for the overall evaluation ofvibration in merchant ships
4 IS/ISO 6954 : 2000 Mechanical vibration-Guidelines for the measurement , reporting and evaluation of vibration with regard to habitability on passenger and merchant ships
30 September 2007 5 IS 11327 : 2007 Requirements for refrigerant condensing units (first revision)
IS 11327 : 1985 Requirements for refrigerants condensing units
30 September 2007
IS 13276 (Part-2) : 1992/ISO 2631-
6 IS/ ISO2631-2 : 2003 [ Superseding IS 13276 (Part -2): 1992] Mechanical vibration and shock-Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration-Part-2 Vibration in buildings ( 1Hz to 80Hz)
2: 1989 Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration Part-2 Continuous and shock induced vibration in buildings (1Hzto80Hz)
30 September 2007
IS 13769 : 1993 /ISO 3449 : 1992
7 IS/ ISO 3449 : 2005 (Superseding IS 13769 : 1993 ) Earth- moving machinery-Falling- object protective structures- Laboratory tests and performance requirements
Earth -moving machinery- Falling-object protective structures Laboratory tests and performance
requirements
Copy of these Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref: MED/G -2: 1 ]
C. K. VEDA, Sc. -F & Head (Technical Engineering)
नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर, 2007
का.आ. 3311.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानका( को) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष
संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि क्रम संख्या
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1
1 नवम्बर 2007
संशोधन नं 3 , मई 2007
आईएस/ 15100 : 2001 मोटर वाहनों में प्रयुक्त स्थायी रूप से बने द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैस आधानों के लिए बहुप्रकायत्मिक वाल्व असेम्बली
31अक्तूबर 2007
संशोधन नं 2 , अक्तूबर 2007
2 आई एस 12699 : 1989 जेट अपकेन्द्री पंप के चयन , संस्थापन एवं परिचालन और रखरखाव- रीति संहिता
इस संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भ एम. ई.डी./जी-2 : 1 ]
सी.के. वेदा, वैज्ञा. ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजी. ) [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
9433 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
New Delhi , the 5th November, 2007
S.O. 3311.- In pursuance ofclause (b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rules (7) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
No. and Year of the Indian Standards
SL. No.
No. and Year ofthe amendment
Date from which the amend- ment shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1 November 2007
Amendment No. 3 May 2007
IS 15100 : 2001 Multifunction valve assembly for permanently fixed liquefied petroleum gas ( LPG) containers for automotive use
AmendmentNo. 2 October 2007 31October 2007 2 IS 12699 : 1989 Selection , installation, operation and maintenance ofjet centrifugal pump combination-- Codeofpractice
Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
[RefMED/G-2: 1 ]
C. K. VEDA, Sc . - F & Head ( Technical Engineering)
नई दिल्ली ,6 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3312.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन (विनियम ) , 1988 की धारा 4 ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधि सूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) के लिए निम्न लाइसेंस प्रदान किया गया/ किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
भारतीय मानक की संख्या
अनुज्ञप्तिधारक का पता
क्रम संख्या और वर्ष
अनुज्ञप्ति संख्या औरलागूहोने कीतिथि
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
भामा 4985 : 2000
7760283
2007-07-10
एरोमा हाईटैक लि. , सर्वे सं. 580 , राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग 15 , समख्याली , राधापुर हाईवे , लकोडियो , तालुका भचाऊ , जिला कच्छ, गुजरात-370150
2
भामा 8034 : 2002
7760586
2007-07-09
अमीधारा पंप इंडस्ट्रीज , 8 - बी , राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग , गामरा पेट्रोल पंप, रिंग रोड, जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360003
3
भामा 14933 : 2001
7761.992
निर्मल रबड़ इंडस्ट्रीज , 45 - उद्योगनगर , सुरेंद्रनगर, जिला सुरेंद्रनगर ,
2007-07-12 गुजरात-363002
4
भामा 302 : भाग 2 खंड 3 1992 7763592
2007-07-25
अजंता लिमिटेड, पी ओ बॉक्स 177 , ओरपेट इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, राजकोट हाईवे , मोरबी , जिला राजकोट , गुजरात-363641 5
भामा 14543 : 2004
7765091
2007-07-24
मन मिनरल्ज, सर्वे सं. 442, 443 प्लॉट सं. 19 , सिखपुर , तालुका मूली, जिला: सुरेंद्रनगर , गुजरात
6
भामा 12269 : 1987
7757597
2007/07/04
रोयल सीमेंट कंपनी , लखधीरपुर रोड, घुंटू, मोरबी, जिला : राजकोट, गुजरात-363642 9434
(2) ( 1)
7
भामा 1417 : 1999 8 भामा 1417 : 1999 9 भामा 2112 : 2003 10 भामा 1417 : 1999 11 भामा 1417 : 1999 12 भामा 1417 : 1999 13 भामा 1417 : 1999 14 भामा 1417 : 1999 15 भामा 1417 : 1999 16 भामा 1417 : 1999 17 भामा 1417 : 1999.
18 भामा 1417 : 1999 19 भामा 1417 : 1999 20 भामा 1417 : 1999 21 भामा 1417 : 1999 22 भामा 1417 : 1999 23 भामा 1417 : 1999 24 भामा 1417 : 1999
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
(3)
(4)
7759706
2007-07-09
अमर ज्वैलरज , जैन प्लॉट , एस टी रोड़ , भेसन , जिला : जूनागढ़, गुजरात-362020
7759302
2007-07-09
गुजरात ज्वैलरज्र , 9 स्वामिनारायण कैम, पैलेस रोड़, जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360001
7759403
2007-07-09
गुजरात ज्वैलरज , 9 स्वामिनारायण कैम , पैलेस रोड़ , जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360001
7759605
गोपी ज्वैलरज , आवेरी बाजार , पोरबंदर , गुजरात -360575 2007-07-09
7764190
2007-07-25
जयदीप ज्वैलरज, राजश्रृंगी पैलेस रोड़ , आशापुर मंदिर के सामने , राजकोट, गुजरात-360001
7763895
2007-07-25
जैतपुरवाला औरनामेंटस, 7 , सहजानंद अपार्टमेंट , लक्ष्मीवाड़ी, राजकोट, गुजरात-360002
7762792
2007-07-18
मीरा ज्वैलरज , 3 , अलंकार बिल्डिंग , पैलेस रोड़ , राजकोट, गुजरात-361001
7764089
2007-07-25
मानेक ज्वैलरस , सेंट्रल बैंक रोड , जामजोधपुर , जिला जामनगर , गुजरात
7759201 2007-07-09
पारेख भांजी वनमालीदास , टावर के समीप , सरजू चौक , अमरेली; गुजरात
7764291
2007-07-25
प्रेम वालर्जी एवं संज ( जे ) प्रा. लिमिटेड, कुंवरजीभाई टावर्स, पैलेस रोड़ , राजकोट , गुजरात 360001
7764392
संजय ज्वैलरज्ज , विट्ठल प्रैस रोड, सुरेंद्रनगर , गुजरात -363001 2007-07-25
7761487
2007-07-13
श्री मनोरथ ज्वैलरस , अंबाजी गली के सामने , नानी बाजार, गोंडल , जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360311
7763693
2007-07-25
श्री मनहर ज्वैलरज्ज , 4 गायकवाड़ी , प्लॉट, तेहलियाराम मंदिर के समीय, राजकोट, गुजरात-360003
7759504
2007-07-09
सोनी नरेंद्र कुमार गंगदास, मेन बाजार , राजुला सिटी , राजुला , जिला अमरेली , गुजरात-365560
7763996
2007-07-25
पायल ज्वैलरा , पवन कोम्पलैक्स , नानी बाजार , आर्यगली के समीप , गोंडल , जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360311
7764695
2007-07-26
शांतिलाल नगरदास एवं कंपनी , नानावती बाजार , भावनगर , गुजरात-364001
7764796
2007-07-26
सोनी पोपटलाल कांजी , 91 , सुभाष रोड , ब्लॉक सं. 10 , वेरावल , जिला जूनागढ़ , गुजरात
7763794
शाह शशिकांत मोहनलाल , सोनी बाजार , राजकोट , गुजरात-360001 2007-07-25
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
ए. के. तलवार, उप महानिदेशक (मुहर ) 9435
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक26 , 1929
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 6th November , 2007
S.O. 3312.-In pursuance of Section 4 (5 ) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Certification (Regulations) , 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that Licence to use Indian Standard Mark, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Address of Licensee
Sl. No.
No. and Year of the Indian Standards
No. andOperative date of Licence
(3)
(2)
(1)
(4)
7760283
1. IS 4985 : 2000
2007/07/10
M/ s Aroma Hightech Ltd. , S. No. 580, N.H. 15, Samkhyali Radhanpur Highway, Lakadia , Taluka Bhachau , Distt Kachchh : Gujarat
7760586
2. IS 8034 : 2002
2007/07/09
Amidhara Pump Industries , 8 -B National Highway, NR . GamaraPetrol Pump, Ring Road, Distt : Rajkot Gujrat -360 003
7761992
3. IS 14933 : 2001
2007/07/12
Nirmal Rubber Industries, 45-Udyog Nagar, Surendra Nagar, Distt: Surendranagar Gujarat -363 002
7763592
4. IS 302 : Part 2 : Sec 3 : 1992
2007/07/25
Ajanta Limited, P.O. Box 177 , Orpat Industries Estate , Rajkot Highway, Morbi Distt : Rajkot Gujarat -363 641
7765091
5. IS 14543 : 2004
2007/07/24
MannMinerals, Survey No. 442, 443 ; Plot No. 19 , Sekhpar , TalukaMuli, Distt: Surendranagar, Gujarat
7757597
6. IS 12269 : 1987
2007/07/04
Royal Cement Company, Lakhdhirpur Road, Ghuntu, Morbi , Distt: RajkotGujarat-363 642
7780087
7. IS 1417 : 1999
Vinayak Jewellers, Chokshi Bazar, Junagadh Gujarat 362001
2007/09/24
7780390
8. IS 1417 : 1999
Choksi Virji, Choksi Bazar , Junagadh Gujarat -362 001
2007/09/24
7780491
9. IS 1417 : 2003
2007/09/24
Luhaar Ghelabhai Kalabhai Jawellers , 101 , Devdarshan Complex, Bhupendra Road Rajkot Gujarat- 360 001
7769406
10. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/09/24
Soni Lalit Chandra Jivrajbhaj Raninga Raj Marg, Upleta Rajkot, Gujarat
7768909
11. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/08/09
Jaisukh Lal Jivrajbha Raninga Behind Court, Main Bazar , Bus Stand Road, Manavadar Junagadh Manavdar Gujarat-362630
7769002
12. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/08/09
AakarGoldGolden Plaza, Soni Bazar , Kotharia Naka Rajkot, Gujarat-360001
7762792
13. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/07/18
M/sMira Jewellers 3, Alankar Building Palace, Road , Rajkot Gujarat-361 001
7764089
14. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/07/25
M/sManek Jewellers Central Bank Road, Jamjodhpur, Distt: Jamnagar , Gujarat,
7759201
15. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/07/09
M/sParikh Bhanji Vanmalidas Near Tower , Sarju Chowk, Amreli,Gujarat
7764291
16. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/07/25
M/ s Premji Valji & Sons (J) Pvt . Ltd. Kuverjibhai Towers, Palace, Road, Rajkot Gujarat - 360 001 9436
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II SEC . 3(ii) ] ( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
17. IS 1417 : 1999
7764392
2007/07/25
M/s Sanjay Jewellers Vithal Press Road, Surendranagar Gujarat-363 001
18. IS 1417 : 1999
7761487
2007/07/13
M/sSh . Manorath Jewellers Opp. Ambaji Street, Nani Bazar , GondalDistt : Rajkot, Gujarat-360 311
19. IS 1417 : 1999
7763693
2007/07/25
M/sShreeManhar Jewellers 4, Gayakvadi Plot, Nr . Taheliyaram Mandir, Rajkot, Gujarat-360 003
20. IS 1417 : 1999
7759504
2007/07/09
M/ s Soni Narendra Kumar Gangadas Main Bazar , Rajula City, RajulaDistt : Amreli Gujarat-365560
21 . IS 1417 : 1999
7763996
2007/07/25
M/ sPayal Jewellers Pavan Comp . Nani Bazar, Near Arya Street, Gondal Distt : Rajkot Gujarat -360 311
22. IS 1417 : 1999
7764695
2007/07/26
M/ s Shantilal Nagardas & Co. Nanavati Bazar , Bhavnagar Gujarat-364 001 ,
7764796
23. IS 1417 : 1999
2007/07/26
M/ sSoni Popatlal Kanji 91 Subhash Road , Block No. 10, Veraval Distt: Junagadh Gujarat
24. IS 1417 : 1999
7763794
2007/07/25
M/ s Shah Shashikant Mohanlal Soni Bazar , Rajkot Gujarat-360,0001
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
A.K. TALWAR, Dy . Director General (Marks )
नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3313. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संख्या क्रम
संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि
1
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
आईएस 9786 : 1981 विनायल क्लोराइड (वीसीएम)
31 अगस्त 2007
संशोधन सं. नं. 2 , अगस्त 2007
की सुरक्षा संहिता
2.
संशोधन सं. नं. 2 , अगस्त 2007
31अक्तूबर 2007 आईएस 3521 : 1999 औद्योगिक सुरक्षा पट्टे व सज्जा कवच-विशिष्टि ( तृतीय पुनरीक्षण )
इन मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ : सीएचडी 8/ आईएस 9786 एवं 3521 ]
ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक- एफ ( रसायन )
New Delhi , the 7th November, 2007
S.O. 3313. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :
9437
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
No. and year of the Indian Standards
No. and year of the the amendment
Date from which the amendment shall have effect SL. No.
(3)
(4)
(1)
(2)
1
31August 2007
Amendment No. 2 , August 2007
IS 9786 : 1981 Code of Safety for Vinyl Chloride(VCM)
31 October 2007 2
Amendment No. 2 , August 2007
IS 3521 : 1999 Industrial Safety Belts and Harnesses-Specification (Third Revision)
Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref: CHD 8 /IS 9786 & 3521 ]
E. DEVENDAR, Scientist -F (Chemical)
नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3314.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के नियम 4 उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं ( जून , 2007 महिना के लिए)
अनुसूची
अनु. वर्ष लाइसेंस संख्या
भा.मा. भाग संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
भारतीय मानक का. शीर्षक
स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
क्रम संख्या
6
7
8 9 1
2
3
4
5
1994 1.
21-06-2007
398 4
5342457
मेसर्स बी एस इंडस्ट्रीज उन्नयन इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट पो. आ.: बोरसुल-713124 जिलस- वर्धमान
पश्चिम बंगाल
शिरोपरि प्रेषणों के लिए एल्यूमीनियम के चालक भाग : 4 एल्यूमीनियम मिश्रधातु के लउदार चालक (एल्यूमीनियम-मैगनीशियम- सिलिकान टाइप)
1996 2
398 2
21-06-2007
5342558
मेसर्स एल्यूमीनियम
कं. प्राई. लिमि. 57/52,
शिरोपरि प्रेषणों के लिए एल्यूमीनियम के चालक भाग : 2 एल्यूमीनियम के चालक जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित
इलेक्ट्रिल्स/मैन्यूफैक्चरिंग
घोषपारा रोड, तेतुलतला ,
हालिशहर-743134
जिला-वर्धमान
पश्चिम बंगाल
1976
710
5345766
6-07-2007
3.
मेसर्स चक्रवर्ती एंटरप्राइज
समुद्री उपयोग के लिए
प्लाईवुड
मिरिक रोड, खपरैल,
पो.आ. निमाई,
मार्ग से -माटीगारा ,
1
दार्जिलिंग-734010
710
1976 6-07-2007
4. 5345867
समुद्री उपयोग के लिए
प्लाईवुड
मेसर्स प्रणब प्रोडक्टस ( प्रा. ) लि. , मिरिक रोड, खपरैल , पो.आ. निमाई ,
भार्ग से-माटीगारा ,
दार्जिलिंग-734010 9438
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
2
3
4 1
5. 5345968
6-07-2007 मेसर्स प्रणब प्रोडक्टस (प्रा. ) लि. , मिरिक रोड, खपरैल , पो.आ. निमाई, मार्ग से -माटीगारा ,
दार्जिलिंग-734010 6. 5347972
23-07-2007. मेसर्स बी एस प्रोग्रेसिव (प्रा. ई. ) लि. गंगारामपुर, पु. स्टे. विष्णुपुर, डायमुड हार्बर रोड, जिला : दक्षिण 24 परगना , पश्चिम बंगाल 7. 5348368
26-07-2007 मेसर्स बी एस प्रोग्रेसिव (प्रा. ई. ) लि. गंगारामपुर, पु. स्टे. विष्णुपुर, डायमुड हार्बर रोड , जिला : दक्षिण 24 परगना, पश्चिमबंगाल 8. 5348469
27-07-2007 मेसर्स रामपुर वयार्स प्रा. लि. 8-ए, पागलाडांगा रोड , कोलकाता-700105 पश्चिम बंगाल
23-08-2007
9. 5352359
मेसर्स आलीसान वेनीर एंडप्लाईवुड प्राई. लि. मौजा-महेशपुर , पो. आ. बिरशिवपुर पु. स्टे- उलुबेरिया जिला-हावड़ा-711316 पश्चिम बंगाल
23-08-2007
10: 5352460
मेसर्स बी एस प्रोग्रेसिव (प्रा. ई. ) लि. गंगारामपुर , पु. स्टेविष्णुपुर, डायमुड हार्बर रोड, जिला : दक्षिण 24 परगना , पश्चिम बंगाल
23-08-2007
11. 5352651
मेसर्स बी एस प्रोग्रेसिव
(प्रा. ई. ) लि. गंगारामपुर, पु. स्टे. विष्णुपुर, डायमुड हार्बर रोड, जिला : दक्षिण 24 परगना , विष्णुपुर, पश्चिम बंगाल
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
6
7
8 5
1976
303
समुद्री उपयोग के लिए
प्लाईवुड
1999
1
2202
लकड़ी के फ्लस डोर
शटर
2004 ब्लाक बोर्ड
1659
2
1996
398
शिरोपरि प्रेषणों के लिए एल्यूमीनियम के चालक भाग-2 एल्यूमीनियम के चालक जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित
2004 ब्लाक बोर्ड
1659
1976
710
समुद्रीउपयोग के लिए प्लाईवुड
1993
4990
कंक्रीट के शटरिंग कार्य के लिएप्लाईवुड 9439 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
1 2
5
6
7
8
4.
3
27-08-2007
1489 1
1991 12. 5353462.
मेसर्स अम्बुजा सीमेंट्स लि. पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट
यूनिट: फराक्का, ग्रामः केंदुआ,
पो.आ. : श्रीमन्तपुर,
पु. स्टे. फराक्का,
जिला : मुर्शिदाबाद-742212
पश्चिम बंगाल
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक (मुहर )
New Delhi , the 7th November, 2007
S.O. 3314. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule ( for the month of June-Aug 2007) :
SCHEDULE
IS No. Part Sec Year
Title of the Standard
Sl.No. Licences No. Grant Date
Name & Address oftheparty
9
6
1 2
3
4
5
7 8
4
398
1994 1. 5342457
21.06.07 M/s . B. S. Industries Dist . Bardhwan WestBengal Unnayani Industrial Estate P.O. Barsui - 713 124
Aluminium Conductors for Overhead Transmission purposes : Part 4. Aluminium Alloy Stranded Conductors (Aluminium Magnesium SiliconType)
2
1996 2. 5342558
398
21.06.07
Aluminium Conductors for overhead Transmission Purposes: Part 2 Aluminium Conductors , Galvanized Steel Reinforced
M/s . Aluminium Electrical Mfg . Co. Pvt.Ltd 57/52 Ghosh ParaRoad Tentultala P.O. Halisahar- 743134 Dist. North 24 Parganas West Bengal
1976
710
3. 5345766
6.07.07
Marine Plywood
M/s. Chakraborty Enter- prise , Mirik Road, Khaprail , P.O. Nemai , Via-Matigara, Darjeeling, West Bengal-734010
1976
710
4. 5345867
6.07.07
Marine Plywood
M/s . Pranav Products( P) Ltd. Mirik Road, Khaprail , P.O. Nemai , Via-Matigara, Darjeeling, West Bengal - 734010
1989
303
5. 5345968
6.07.07
Plywood for general purposes
M/s . Pranav Products (P) Ltd. Mirik Road, Khaprail , P.O. Nemai , Via-Matigara, Darjeeling, WestBengal-734010
4506G1/07--7 9440
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
4
2
3
7
1
5
6
8
9 5347972
1
6.
2202
1999 23-07-07
Wooden Flush Door Shutters
M/ s . B. S. Progressive (Pvt . Ltd.) Gangarampur, P.S. Bishnu Pur Diamond Harbour Road , Dist. South 24 Parganas , WestBengal .
7. 5348368
2004
BlockBoard
1659
26-07-07 M/ s . B. S. Progressive (Pvt. Ltd.), Gangarampur, P.S.Bishnupur Diamond Harbour Road, Dist . South 24 Parganas , WestBengal .
i
2
1996 8.5348469
398
27-07-07 M/ s . Rampur Wires ( P) Ltd. , 8A, Pagladanga Road, Kolkata-700105 , WestBengal .
Aluminium conductor for overhead transmission purposes , Part 2 : Aluminium conductors , Galvanized SteelReinforced
2004
1659
9. 5352359
BlockBoard
23-08-2007 M/ s . Alishan Veneer & Plywood Pvt.Ltd . , Mouza : Maheshpur , P.O. Birshibpur , P.S. Uluberia , Dist. Howrah -71 1316 , Bengal .
710
10. 5352460
1976
MarinePlywood
23-08-2007 M/ s . B. S. Progressive Pvt. Ltd. , Gangarampur, P.S. Bishnupur Diamond Harbour Road, Dist. South 24 Parganas , Bishnupur, West Bengal .
4990
1993 11. 5352561 23-08-2007
Plywood for concrete shuttering works
M/s . B. S. Progressive (Pvt. Ltd.) Gangarampur, P.S. Bishnupur Diamond Harbour Road, Dist. South 24 Parganas , West Bengal
1
1991 12. 5353462
1489
27-08-07
Portland Pozzolana Cement
↓
M/s . Ambuja Cements Ltd. , Unit: Farakka, Vill: Kendua, P.O. Srimantapur P.S. Farakka, Dist . Murshidabad. West Bengal-742212 .
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
A. K. TALWAR, Dy . Director General ( Marks ) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
9441 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
नईदिल्ली, 7 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3315.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) उप - विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
क्रम संख्या
लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-
लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
रद्द/स्थगित करने कीतिथि 1
2
4
3
5 1. 7420562.
04-07-2007
कृषि प्रयोजनों के लिए समगति संपीडन प्रज्जवलन (डीजल इंजन की कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं
आईएस 11170 : 1985
अजीतडीज़लज , 6, आजी वसाहत , के रसिकलाल एवं कंपनी के पीछे , राजकोट, गुजरात-360003
2. 7440871
04-07-2007
सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए समगति संपीडन प्रज्जवलन (डीजल ) इंजन की कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं आईएस 10001 : 1981
पी एम डीजलज प्रा. लिमिटेड, पोस्टबॉक्स सं 1003 , आजी इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट , राजकोट, गुजरात -360003 .
3. 7487493
09-07-2007
जल कार्य प्रयोजनों के लिए स्लूइस वाल्व (50से 1200 मिमि आकार ) आईएस 14846 : 2000
प्रेजीडेंट टेक्सटाईलज इंडस्ट्रीज़ , कृष्णा कोल्ड स्टोरेज , गोंडल रोड , गली सं. 2 , सम्राट इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , राजकोट, गुजरात -360004,
[ सं. सीएमडी-13 : 13 ]
ए. के. तलवार, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) New Delhi , the 7th November, 2007
S.O. 3315.- In pursuance of sub -regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certifica- tion ) Regulations , 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each :-
SCHEDULE
Name & Address of the licensee
Sl . Licences No. No. CM/L-
Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence
Dateof cancellation/the licence cancelled/ suspension 1
2
3
4
5
1. CM/L - 7420562
04-07-2007
Speed Compression Ignition ( Diesel ) (Upto20kw) Engines for Agricultural Purposes
IS 11170 : 1985
M/ sAjeet Diesels , 6, Aji Vasahat , Behind K. Rasiklal &Co., Distt.: Rajkot , Gujarat-360003
2. CM/L -7440871
04-07-2007
Performance requirements for constant speed compression ignition (diesel ) engines for general purposes ( upto 20kw) ( 1S 10001 : 1981
M/sP.M. Diesels Pvt . Ltd. , Post Box No. 1003 , Aji Industrial Estate, Rajkot , Gujarat-360003
3. CM/L - 7487493
09-07-2007
Sluice Valve for Water Works Purposes (50 to 1200 mm Size)-Specification IS 14846: 2000
M/s President Textiles Industries B/H Kishan Cold Storage, Gondal Road, Street No. 2, Samrat Industrial Area , Rajkot , Distt. Rajkot Gujarat-360004
[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ]
A. K. 1 ALWAR , Dy. Director General (Marks) 9442
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नईदिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3316.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरोः एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है: -
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
क्रम संख्या
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4) 1
30सितम्बर , 2007 आईएस/ आईईसी 62271-105 : 2002 उच्च वोल्टता के स्विचगियर और नियंत्रणगियर भाग 105 प्रत्यावर्ती धारा स्विच फ्यूज संयोजन
इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली +110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ : ई.टी. 08/टी-36 ]
पी. के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख ( वैद्युत तकनीकी)
New Delhi , the 13th November , 2007
S.O. 3316. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards, particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :-
SCHEDULE
Sl . No. & Year of the Indian Standards No.
Date of Established
No. & Year of the Indian Standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
30September , 2007 1 IS/IEC 62271-105 : 2002 High voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 105 Alternating current switch - fuse combinations
Copy of this Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patria , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
:
[Ref: ET08/T -36]
P. K. MUKHERJEE , Sc . -F & Head (Electrical Engineer )
कोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 12 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3317.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि, इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किये जाने की संभावना है;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तःअधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस क्षेत्र में कोयले के लिए पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी )/भूमि/313 तारीख 23 मार्च , 2007 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , अनूपपुर ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700 001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर -495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर , भारसाधक अधिकारी या विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व) साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर -495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) को भेंजगे । 9443
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग 11 -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
बकही ब्लाक विस्तार ,
सोहागपुर क्षेत्र
जिला-अनूपपुर ( मध्य प्रदेश)
रेखांक संख्या - एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/313 तारीख 23 मार्च , 2007 ( पूर्वेक्षण के लिए अधिसूचना भूमि दर्शाते हुए )
जिला
टिप्पण
पटवारी
तहसील
ग्राम का
क्षेत्र हेक्टर में
बंदोबस्त नम्बर
क्रम संख्या
नाम
हल्का नम्बर
25.704
भाग 629
47
बकही
1.
अनूपपुर
अनूपपुर
योग: 25.704 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 63.52 एकड़ ( लगभग )
सीमा वर्णन :--
क-ख- ग -घ : रेखा ग्राम बकही की पूर्वी सीमा पर " क " बिन्दु से आरम्भ होती है , और बकही ग्राम से गुजरते हुए उसी ग्राम की पूर्वी सीमा पर ही बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।
घ-क:
रेखा ग्राम बकही के पूर्वी सीमा से गुजरते हुए " क " बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/ 10/2007- पी.आर.आई.डब्ल्यू-1 ] एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 12th November , 2007
S.O. 3317. Wheareas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein .
The plan of the area bearing Number : SECL/BSP /GM (PLG )/Land/ 313 dated 23rd March, 2007 covered by this notification can be inspected at the office of the Collector , Anuppur (Madhya Pradesh ) or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or at the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section) Seepat Road , Bilaspur - 495006 ( Chhattisgarh).
All personsrsons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub -section (7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the Officer- in - Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue ) , South Eastern Coalfields Limited , Seepat Road, Bilaspur - 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ) within ninety days from the date of publica- tion of this notification in the Official Gazette .
SCHEDULE
Bakhi Block Extension
Sohagpur Area
District-Anuppur ( Madhya Pradesh)
Plan bearing No. S.E.C.L./BSP/G.M. (PLG )/ LAND/3 13 dated 23 March, 2007 (Showing the land notified for prospecting) .
Remarks
Tahsil
District
Area in hectares
Bandobast No.
Patwari halka number
Serial No.
Name of village
25.704
Part
47
629
Bakhi
1 .
Anuppur
Anuppur
Total :-25.704 hectares (Approx. ) OR 63.52 acres (Approx. )
Boundary description :-
A-B-C-D: Line starts from point " A" on the eastern boundary of village Bakhi and passes through village Bakhi and meets at point " D " on the eastern boundary of the same village .
D-A: Line passes through eastern boundary of village Bakhi and meets at point " A " .
[F. No. 43015/ 10/2007 - PRIW - I ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.
9444
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/ KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 12 नवम्बर , 2007
का.आ. 3318:-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 2716, तारीख 30 जून , 2006 , जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड-3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 15 जुलाई , 2006 में प्रकाशित की गई थीं, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 599.718 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि में कोमला अभिप्राप्त है ;
अतः , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) , अधिनियम 1957 की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 599.718 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने की अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;
टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या ईसीएल/एचयूआरआरए " सी " मौजा/06 तारीख 13-11-2006 को उपायुक्त जिला -गोड्डा( झारखंड ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी ( प्रचालन ) ईस्टर्न कोलफील्डस लिमिटेड , सेंकटोरिया , डाकघर दिशेरगढ , जिला- बर्दमान ( पं. बंगाल ) पिन कोड सं. 713335 के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
टिप्पण 2 : कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं -
अर्जन की बाबत आपत्तियाँ
1. कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में, जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गयी है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर संम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जम किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।
स्पष्टीकरणः इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी , कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयले उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।
2. उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जायेगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता कोस्वयं सुने जाने, विधिव्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जॉच यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़े या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उनके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।
इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकार में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं ।
टिप्पण 3 : केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता -700001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 2520 तारीख 11 जून , 1983 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।
अनुसूची
हुर्रा "सी " परियोजना , ( राजमहल कोलफील्डस )
थाना सं.
थाना क्रम सं. मौजा का नाम
36
जिला
क्षेत्र हेक्टर में टिप्पणियाँ
भाग
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
1. हुर्रा
42.804
गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
35
2. फुलबेरिया
पियाराम
3.
34
भाग
44.104
गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
4.
4
भाग
23.804
गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
हरकट्टा
22.792
भाग गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
12
5. हरिपुर
6.
5
190.706
भाग गोड्डा
भाग
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
बड़ाखेरबानी
लीलातरी
16
7.
18.745
गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
01
92.428
भाग गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
8. ड्डुमरिया
9.
1
भाग
7.543
गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
हाहाजोर
10.
156.097
भाग गोड्डा
ललमटिया बोआरीजोर
कुछ नहीं
जंगल ब्लॉक
0.694
भाग गोड्डा
कुल क्षेत्र 599.718 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) 9445
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भूमिअनुसूची
मौजा हुर्रा थाना सं. 36 में
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर , जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जानेवाले प्लॉट
1, 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9, 10 , 12, 13 , 14, 15 , 16, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ( भाग ) , 23 , 24 ( भाग ) , 25 ( भाग ) , 26( भाग ) , 7 (भाग ) , 77( भाग ) , 79 ( भाग ) , 80 ( भाग ) , 82 ( भाग ) , 83 ( भाग ) , 84 , 85, 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95 ( भाग ) , 96 ( भाग ) , 97 ( भाग ) , 98( भाग ) , 99 ( भाग ) , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104( भाग ) , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117, 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143, 144 , 145 , 146, 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157, 158 , 159, 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168, 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175, 176 ( भाग ) , 177 , 178 ( भाग ) , 179 ( भाग ) , 225 ( भाग ) , 243 ( भाग ) , 245 ( भाग ) , 246(भाग) , 247 ( भाग ) , 278( भाग ) , 304, 312 ( भाग ) , 314 ( भाग ) , 315 , 316 , 317, 318 , 319( भाग ) , 320, 321 , 322 , 324 ( भाग ) , 325 , 326, 332( भाग) ,
मौजा फुलबेरिया थाना सं. 35
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर, जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
1 ( भाग ) , 107 ( भाग ) , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134, 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 (अंश ) , 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160, 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185, 186, 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200, 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205, 206( भाग ) , 207 ( भाग ) , 208 ( भाग ) , 210 ( भाग ) , 211 , 212, 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 ( भाग ) , 229 ( भाग ) , 230 ( भाग ) , 232( भाग ) , 234 ( भाग ) , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242, 243 , 244 ( भाग ) , 245 ( भाग ) , 250 ( भाग ) , 254( भाग ) , 374 ( भाग ) , 378 ( भाग ) , 426 ( भाग ) , 561 ( भाग ) , 562( भाग ) , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574, 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602, 603 , 604 , 605 , 606, 607 , 608 , 609 , 610, 611 , 612, 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624, 625 , 626 , 627, 628 , 629 , 630, 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 636, 637, 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 645 , 646 , 647, 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654,655, 656 , 657, 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 623 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678,679,680 , 681, 682, 683 , 684, 685 , 686 , 687, 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705, 706( भाग ) , 733( भाग ) , 734 , 735( भाग ) , 736( भाग ) , 737( भाग ) ,
मौजा पियाराम थाना सं. 34
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर , जिला गोडडा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
469, 470, 471 , 472, 473 , 474 , 475 , 522( भाग ) ,
मौजा हाहाजोर थाना सं. 13
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर, जिला गोडडा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
9 (भाग ) , 13 ( भाग ) , 16( भाग ) , 18 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 60 ( भाग ) , 61 , 62( भाग ) , 63 , 64 ( भाग ) , 65 , 66 , 67 ,68 , 69,70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ( भाग ) , 74 , 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79, 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84, 85, 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117, 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146, 265 , 266ए 267, 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278, 279 , 280, 281 , 282, 283 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 289, 290 , 291 , 292, 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 311 , 312 , 313 .
9446
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC.3 (ii) ] मौजा बडा खेश्बनी थाना सं. 05
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर, जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
15( भाग ) , 16 ( भाग ) , 17( भाग ) , 18( भाग ) , 19( भाग ) , 20( भाग ) , 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36( भाग ) , 37( भाग ) , 38( भाग ) , 39( भाग ) , 40( भाग ) , 44( भाग ) , 45( भाग ) , 46( भाग ) , 68( भाग ) , 69 , 170( भाग ) , 171 ( भाग ) , 476 .
मौजाः हरिपुर थाना सं. 12
थाना, ललमटिया बोआरीजोर , जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
1 ( भाग ) , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12, 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26, 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62, 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75, 76, 77, 78 , 79 , 80, 81 , 82, 83 , 84 , 85, 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95, 96, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109, 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147, 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155, 156, 157 , 158, 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 166, 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 ,
163 , 164 , 165 ,
174 , 175, 176 , 177, 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 189, 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 ,
186, 187, 188 ,
201 ,
194, 195 , 196 , 197, 198 , 199 , 200, 202, 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209, 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 225 ,
228 , 229 , 230 ,
224 , 226, 227 ,
231 , 232, 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245, 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255,256 , 257 , 258 , 259 .
मौजाः डुमरिया थाना सं. 01 थानाः ललमटिया बोआरीजोर , जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट 1227
मौजा हरकट्टा थाना सं. 04
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर, जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
532( भाग ) , 533 ,687, 688 , 689( भाग ) , 695.
मौजा लीलातारी थाना सं. 11
थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर ,जिला गोड्डा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट
1 , 2 ( भाग ) , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7, 8 ( भाग ) , 9 ( भाग ) , 19 ( भाग ) , 20( भाग ) , 26 ( भाग ) , 27 ( भाग ) , 28 ( भाग ) , 29( भाग ) , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35, 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41( भाग ) , 42 ( भाग ) , 43 ( भाग ) , 102 ( भाग ) , 114( भाग ) , 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136, 137, 138 , 139( भाग ) , 140, 141 ( भाग ) , 142 ( भाग ) , 143 ( भाग ) , 148( भाग ) , 150( भाग ) , 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159, 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165 ,
160,
166, 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196, 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217, 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252, 253 , 254 , 255, 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263 , 264 , 265 , 266, 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289, 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306, 307, 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313, 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337,338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344, 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372, 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385,386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390, 391 , 392, 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404, 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409, 410 , 411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422, 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433, 434, 435 , 436, 437 , 438 , 439 , 440, 441 , 442, 443 , 444 , 445, 446, 447, 448 , 449, 450, 451 , 452, 453,454, 455 , 456अंश , 9447 [ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
457, 458, 459 , 460, 461 , 462, 463 , 464, 465 , 466, 467, 468 , 469, 470 , 471 , 472, 473 , 474, 475, 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481,482,483,484 , 485 , 486, 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494 , 495 , 496 , 497 , 498, 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505, 506, 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524, 525 , 526, 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536, 537,538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544, 545, 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563, 564, 565, 566( भाग ) , 567, 568, 569 , 570( भाग ) , 571 , 572( भाग ) , 573( भाग ) , 574 , 575 , 576, 577 , 578 , 579, 580( भाग) , 581 ( भाग ) , 594( भाग ) , 596( भाग) , 597, 598( भाग ) , 599 , 600( भाग ) , 607( भाग ) , 6-45 ( भाग) , 646( भाग ) ,647 , 648,649,650,651,652,653,654,655 , 656 , 657,658 , 659 , 660 , 661,662,663,664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671, 672( भाग) , 673, 674 , 675 , 676, 677 , 678 , 679, 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688,689, 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696 , 697 , 698 , 699 , 700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704, 705 , 706, 707 , 708 ( भाग ) , 709( भाग ) , 710( भाग ) , 712 ( भाग ) , 713( भाग ) , 715( भाग ) , 716 , 717 , 718 ( भाग ) , 724( भाग ) , 726( भाग ) , 727 , 728( भाग ) , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732, 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745 , 746, 747 , 748 , 749, 750( भाग ) , 751 ( भाग ) , 753,754 , 755( भाग ) , 756 ( भाग ) , 758( भाग ) , 763( भाग ) , 766( भाग ) , 767( भाग ) , 768 ( भाग ) , 771 ( भाग ) , 772( भाग ) , 773 ( भाग ) , 774( भाग ) , 1182( भाग ) , 1183 ( भाग)
मौजा जंगल ब्लॉक थाना सं. शून्य , थाना ललमटिया बोआरीजोर , जिला गोडडा में अर्जन किए जाने वाले प्लॉट शुन्य
'सीमा विवरण ( का क19 )
का - क2 : रेखा प्लॉट सं. 510 मौजा हरकट्टा सं. 4 के क। बिन्दु से शुरु होकर प्लॉट सं. 532 से गुजरती हुई नदी 689 को पार करती हुई भौजा बडा खेरबनी सं. 5 के प्लॉट सं. 15 से होती हुई और प्लॉट सं. 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 171 , 68 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 38 , 45 , 44 , 46 , 170, से गुजरती हुई मौजा बड़ा खेरबनी सं.5 और मौजा लीलातरी सं. 11 की सम्मिलित सीमा में क2 बिन्दु पर मिलती है।
क2 -क3 : रेखा मौजा बडा खेरबनी थाना सं. 5 और मौजा लीलातरी थाना सं. 11 की सम्मिलित सीमा रेखा के क2 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर 'लॉट सं. 2, 8 , 9 , 19 , 20 , 27 , 26 , 29 , 53 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 102 , 148 , 150 , 139 , 143 , 142 , 141 , 114 , 673 , 774 , 773 , 771 , 772 , 767, 763 , 768 , 766 , 750 , 751 , 758 , 756 , 755 , 718 ,, 715 , 713 , 728 , 726 , 724 , 712 , 710 , 709 , 874 , 875 , 876 , 879 , 878 , 886, 887 , 889 , 672 , 645 , 646 , 456 , 600 , 598 , 607 , से गुजरती है और मौजा लीलातरी सं. 11 प्लॉट सं. 1182 में बिन्दु क3 पर मिलती है। क3 क4 : रेखा मौजा लीलातारी थाना सं. 11 प्लॉट सं. 1182 में बिन्दु क3 से प्रारंभ होकर इसी मौजा के प्लॉट सं. 1183 , 594 , 596 , 597 , 580 , 581 , 573 , 572 , 570 , 566 , से गुजरती है और सम्मिलित सीमा मौजा लीलातरी सं. 11 एवं हुर्रा सं. 36 की सम्मिलित सीमा को पार करती हुई मौजा सं. 36 के प्लॉट सं. 247 , 246 , 245 , 243 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 से गुजरती हुई इसी मौजा हुर्रा के प्लॉट सं. 132 में बिन्दु क4 पर मिलती है ।
क 4 क 5 रेखा मौजा हुर्रा स. 36 के प्लाट सं. 132 में क 4 से प्रारंभ होकर प्लॉट स. 26,82,83,87 , 80,79,77 ,75,95 ,225,96,97,98,99,104,176,179,178,278,314,312,304से गुजरती हुई सम्मिलित सीमा मौजा स. 36 और जंगल ब्लॉक स. - शुन्य की सीमा पर क 5 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
क 5 क 6 : रेखा साझा सम्मिलित मौजा स. 36 और जंगल ब्लॉक स.'शून्य पर क 5 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर मौजा जंगल ब्लॉक स. शून्य प्लॉट सं. शून्य से गुज़रती हुई पुनः सम्मिलित सीमा मौजा सं. 36 और जंगल ब्लॉक सं. शुन्य को पार करती हुई मौजा हुर्रा सं. 36 के प्लॉट नं. 332.319,324 से गुजरती हुई सम्मिलित सीमा हुर्रा नं. 36 और मौजा फुलबेरिऱ्या संः 35 में क 6 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
क6 क7 : रेखा साझा सीमा हुर्रा न. 36 और मौजा फुलबेरिया सं. 35 में क 6 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर फुलबेरिया सं. 35 के प्लॉट सं. 237,736,735,734,733,706,561 , और मौजा फुलबेरिया सं. 35 के प्लॉट सं. 562 में बिन्दु क 7 पर मिलती है ।
क 7-क8 : रेखा मौजा फुलबेरिया सं. 35 के प्लॉट सं. 562 में बिन्दु क 7 से होकर इसी मौजा के प्लॉट न. 426 , 378 , 374 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 210 , 229 , 228 , 230 , 232 , 234 , 254 , 250 , 245 , 244 , 151 , 107 , 1 , से गुजरती है और मौजा फुलबेरिया सं. 35 और मौजा हरिपुर सं. 12 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु क 8 पर मिलती है ।
क 8 - क9 : रेखा मौजा फुलबेरिया सं. 35 और मौजा हरिपुर सं. 12 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु क 8 से प्रारंभ होकर मौजा हरिपुर सं. 12 के प्लांट 1 से गुजरती हुई पुनः मौजा हरिपुर सं. 12 और मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर क 9 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
क9- क10 : रेखा मौजा हरिपुर सं. 12 और मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर क 9 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 के प्लॉट सं . 522 से गुजरती हुई मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 और मौजा छोटा खैरबनी सं. 16 की सम्मिलित सीमा क 10 बिन्दु पर मिलती है । 4506Gl/07-8 9448
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] क 10 - क 11 : रेखा साझा सीमा मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 और मौजा छोटा खैरबनी सं. 16 की सम्मिलित सीमा के क 10 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर सम्मिलित सीमा मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 और मौजा छोटा खैरबनी सं. 16 की सम्मिलित सीमा को पार करते हुए पुनः मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 के प्लॉट सं 469 ताथा मौजा छोटा खैरबनी सं. 16 के प्लॉट सं. 67 से होकर गुजरती हुई मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 के प्लॉट नं. 522,470 को पार करती हुई पुनः मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 के प्लॉट सं. 470 में बिन्दु के 11 पर मिलती है ।
क 11 - क 12 : रेखा मौजा पियाराम सं. 34 के प्लॉट सं. 470 में बिन्दु क 11 से प्रारंभ होकर मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 , मौजा रंगमटिया और न. 15 की सम्मिलित होकर क 12 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
का 12- क13 : रेखा मौजा रंगमटिया सं. 15 और मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 की सम्मिलित सीमा में क 12 बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लॉट सं. 74 की पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 74 में बिन्दु क 13 पर मिलती है ।
कं 13- क 14 : रेखा मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 74 की पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु क 13 से प्रांरभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 60,62,64 , से गुजरती हुई मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 66 के क 14 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
के 14 - क 15 : रेखा मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 66 से क 14 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 56 , 55 , 54 , 39, 40 , 73 , 29 , 28 , 26 , 25 , 24 , 23 , के पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई प्लॉट सं. 20 में के 15 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
क 15 का 16 : रेखा मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 20 की पश्चिमी सीमा के क 15 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 20, 73 , 17 , 16, 14, 13 , 9 , से गुजरती हुई मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 8 की पश्चिमी सीमा के क 16 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
के 16 के 17 : रेखा मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 के प्लॉट सं. 8 में बिन्दू क 16 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 8,6,5,4,3,2 से गुजरती हुई मौजा हाहाजोर सं. 13 और मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 की सम्मिलित सीमा रेखा को पार करतौ हुई मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 के प्लॉट सं. 1190,1227 के पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 के प्लॉट सं. 1191 में क 17 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
कं 17- को 18 : रेखा मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 के प्लॉट सं. 1191 की पश्चिमी सीमा के क 17 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 1191,1194 से गुजरती हुई मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 के प्लॉट सं. 1195 के पूर्वी सीमा के क 18 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
! कं 18- क 19 : रेखा मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 के प्लॉट सं. 1195 के पूर्वी सीमा पर के 18 बिन्दु से प्रारंभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 1195 , 1198,1226,1224 और 1223 से गुजरती है और सम्मिलित सीमा मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 एवं हरकटटा सं. 4 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर मौजा डुमरिया के प्लॉट सं. 1223 के क 19 बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
का 19 क 1 : रेखा मौजा डुमरिया सं. 01 एवं हरकटटा न. 4 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर क 19 बिन्दु से प्रांरभ होकर मौजा डुमरिया 01 के प्लॉट सां 1223, 1222,1221,1220 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती हुई मौजा हरकटटा सं. 04 की सम्मिलित सीमा रेखा से गुजरती है और पुनः मौजा हरकटटा के प्लॉट सं. 695 , 503 , 505 , 509 से गुजरती हुई मौआ हरकटटा के प्लॉट सं. 510 के बिन्दु क । पर मिलती है ।
[सं. 43015/01 / 2006- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 12th November, 2007
S. O. 3318. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S. O. 2716 dated the 30th June, 2006 issued under sub- section ( 1) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Area (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957, (20 of 1957 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India, in Part II , section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated 15th July , 2006, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for Coal in 599.718 hectares (approximately) of land in the locality specified in the Schedule hereto annexed to that notification.
And , whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable from the said land;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition arid Development) Act, 1957 , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 599.718 hectares ( Approximately) in all right as the Schedule appended hereto:
Note1:- The plan bearing number ECL/HURRA'C ' /MOUZA/06 dated 13-11-2006 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Dy . Commissioner , District, Godda (Jharkhand ) ) , or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1. Council House Street, Kolkata -700 001 , or in the office ofthe Director Technical (Operation ), Eastern Coalfields Limited, Sanctoria, Post Office - Dishergarh, Dist . Burdwan ( West Bengal) . Pin Code Number 713 333 .
[भाग 1]-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
9449
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , which provides as follows:-
"8( 1 ) Objection as acquisition" :-
(1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which notification under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 7 has been issued may within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.
Explanation - It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of the coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or any other persons .
(2) Every objection under suh - section ( 1 ) of section 8 shall be made to the Competent Authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further enquirey, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 or rights in or over such land or make different reports in respect ofdifferent parcels of such land , to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections together with the record of the proceedings held by him , for the decisions of the Government .
For the purpose of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who will be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were enquired under this Act .
Note- 3:- The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 has been appointed by the Central Govt . as the competent authority under the Act vide notification number S.O. 2520 Dt . 11th June 1983.
SCHEDULE
HURRA ' C' PROJECT(RAJMAHAL COAL FIELDS)
Police Station
Thana No.
SI . No
Mouza Village
36
1 Ништа
LalmatiaBoarijore 2
35
Fulberia
Lalmatia Boarijore 3
34
Piararn
LalmatiaBoarijore
4
4 Harkatta
Lalmatia Boarijore 5
12
Haripur
Lalmatia Boarijore 6
5
Bara Kherbani
Lalhatia Boarijore 7 Lilatori
16
Lalmatia Boarijore 8 Durnaria
1
LalmatiaBoarijore 9
13
Hahajor
LalmatiaBoarijore
Nil
10 Forest Block
Lalmatia Boarijore LAND SCHEDULE
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Hurra Thana No.36 P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijore, Distt . Godda
District
Remarks
Area Hect.
Part
Godda
42.804
Part
Godda
44.104
Godda
23.804
Part
22.792
Godda
Part
Godda 190.706
Part
18.745
Part
Godda
Godda
92.428
Part
7.543
Godda
Part
Godda
Part
156.097
Godda
0.694
Part
Total:-599.718 Hect. (Approximately) 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 (P ), 23 , 24(P) , 25 (P) , 26(P) , 75(P) , 77 (P), 79(P) , 80( P) , 82 (P) , 83 (P) , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95(P), 96(P), 97(P) , 98(P ), 99(P), 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104(P), 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 , 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126, 127, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 136, 137, 138 , 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147, 148 , 149 , 150, 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156, 157,158 , 159, 160, 161 , 162 , 163 , 164,165, 166, 167, 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 174 , 175 , 176(P) , 177, 178(P ) , 179 (P), 225 (P ) , 243 (P) . 245 ( P), 246 (P) , 247(P), 278 (P ) , 304, 312(P) , 314(P), 315, 316, 317, 318,319(P), 320, 321 , 322, 324 (P ), 325, 326, 332(P) 9450
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/ KARTIKA 26 , 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] Plots to be acquired in Mouza Fulberia Thana No.35
P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijore , Dist . Godda
1 (P), 107(P), 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115, 116, 117, 118 , 119 , 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126 , 127 , 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133, 134, 135 , 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151 (P), 152, 153, 154, 155 , 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165, 166, 167 , 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184 , 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193 , 194, 195 , 196, 197, 198, 199,200,201,202,203,204,205, 206 (P), 207(P) , 208 (P)210(P), 211,212,213,214, 215, 216, 217 , 218 , 219, 220, 221 , 222, 223 , 224 , 225, 226, 227, 228 (P), 229(P), 230(P), 232 (P ) 234(P) , 235, 236, 237 , 238 , 239, 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 (P) , 245 (P ) , 250 ( P ) , 254 (P ) , 374 ( P), 378 ( P ) , 426 (P ) , 561 ( P ) , 562 ( P ) , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579, 580, 581 , 582, 583 , 584,585,586,587,588,589,590,591,592,593,594,595, 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602,603,604,605,606,607,608,609,610,611 , 612,613,614, 615 , 616, 617, 618,619 , 620,621,622,623,624,625,626,627,628,629,630,631,632, 633,634,635 , 636,637,638,639,640,641,642, 643,644, 645,646, 647, 648,649,650,651 , 652 , 653,654,655 , 656,657,658,659,660,661,662,663,664,665,666, 667, 668,669,670, 671 , 672, 673 , 674,675,676,677,678,679,680,681,682,683,684,685,686,687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692,693,694,695,696,697,698,699,700,701,702,703 , 704,705, 705 (P), 733 (P), 734, 735(P), 736(P) , 737 (P) .
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Piaram Thana No.34
P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor, Dist. Godda
469,470,471,472,473,474,475, 522 (P) .
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Hahajore , Thana No. 13
P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor, Dist . Godda
9( P1, 13 ( P ), 18 ( P ), 18,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38 , 60(P), 61 , 62 (P), 63 , 64(P), 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 , 72 , 73 ( P), 74 , 75, 76, 77, 78, 74,30.81.82.83 ,84, 85, 86 , 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125 , 126, 127, 128, 129 , 130 , 131 , 132, 133 , 134 , 135, 136, 137, 138 , 139 , 140, 141, 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300, 301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,311,312,313 .
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Barakherbani , Thana No.5
P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor, Dist . Godda
1.5( P), 16 (P), 17, 18 (P), 19( P), 20(P), 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,30,31,32,33,34, 35, 36(P), 37(P), 38 ( P), 39( P), 40(P ), 44 (P) 45( P) , 46(P) , 68 (P) , 69, 170(P) , 171 (P) , 476.
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Haripur, Thana No.12
P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor , Dist. Godda
i (F), 2, 3,4,5,6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40, 41 ,42, 43, 44, 45, 46,47, 48, 49, 50, 51 , 52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70, 71 , 72 , 73 ,74, 75, 76, 77,78,79,80,81,82 , 33,84, 85, 86 , 87, 88, 89 , 90, 91 , 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118 , 119 , 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125 , 126, 127, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 , 137, 138, 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143, 144, 145 , 146, 147 , 148 , 149, 150, 151 , 152, 153, 154, 155, 156 , 157, 158 , 159, 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164, 165, 166, 167, 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172 , 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197, 198 , 199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208, 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215 , 216, 217, 218 , 219, 220 , 221 , 222, 22.3,224, 275,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245, 246, 247, 248 , 249, 250, 251 , 252, 253 , 254,258,256,257,258,259 .
Piots to be acquired in Mouza Dumuria, Thana No.1 P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor, Dist . Godda
1227.
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Harkatta , Thana No.04 P.S. Lalmatia , Boarijor, Dist . Godda
532P) ,533, 687,688 , 689(P ) , 695 .
9451 [ भाग 11---खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Lilatori, Thana No. 11 P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor, Dist . Godda
1,2(P) , 3,4,5,6,7, 8(P), 9(P), 19(P), 20(P), 26(P) , 2.7(P), 28 (P), 29(P), 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35,36,37,38,39,40,41 (P), 42(P), 43(P), 102(P), 114(P), 115 , 116, 117, 118 , 119, 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126, 127 , 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139(P), 140, 141 (P), 142(P), 143 (P ), 148(P), 150(P), 151 , 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161 , 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179 , 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198 , 199,200,201,202,203 , 204 , 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218 , 219,220,221,223 , 224, 225, 226, 227, 228 , 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251 , 252, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261, 262,263, 264, 265,266, 267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281 , 282,283, 284, 285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296, 297, 298 , 299, 300, 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320, 321 , 322, 323, 324325, 326,327,328, 329, 330, 331,332, 333, 334, 335,336,337, 338,339340,341,342,343,344,345, 346, 347, 348,349,350,351,352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357,358,359,360, 361 , 362, 363, 364,365, 366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384, 385,386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391,392, 393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401,402,403,404, 405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422, 423,424,425,426, 427, 428, 429,430,431,432,433,434,435,436,437,438,439,440,441,442,443 ,444, 445,446,447,448,449,450,451 , 452,453,454,455, 456(P), 457,458, 459, 460,461 ,462,463,464,465,466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479, 480,481,482,483,484,485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493, 494, 495, 496, 497,498 , 499, 500,501 , 502, 503 , 504, 505, 506, 507, 508,509,510,511 , 512,513 , 514, 515, 516, 517, 518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530,531 , 532, 533,534, 535, 336,537 , 538 , 539, 540, 541 , 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551 , 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561 , 562, 563, 564, 565, 566(P), 567, 568,569,570(P) , 571,572 (P), 573 (P), 574,575,576,577,578,579, 580(P), 581 (P), 594(P), 596(P), 597 , 98(P), 599, 600(P), 607(P), 645 (P) , 646(P) , 647, 648,649, 650,651,652,653,654, 655, 656, 657, 658,659, 660, 661 , 662, 663, 164 , 665 , 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671 , 672(P), 673 (P), 674,675,676,677,678,679,680,681,682,683, 684, 685,686,687,688,689, 90, 691,692, 693 , 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701 , 702, 703 , 704, 705 , 706, 707, 708, 709(P) , 710(P), 712(P), 713 (P), 715(P), 716,717, 718 (P), 724( P) , 726(P) , 727 , 728(P) , 729, 730, 731 , 732, 733 , 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740 , 741 , 742, 743,744, 45 746,747,748,749, 750(P), 751 (P), 753, 754 , 755 (P) , 756 (P), 758 (P), 763 (P ), 766(P) , 767 (P ), 768 (P) , 771 (P) , 772(P) , 773(P), 774(P), 1182(P); 1183 (P) .
Plots to be acquired in Mouza Jungle Block No. - Nil
P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor, Dist. Godda
Plot nos:-Nil
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION (AI - A19)
AI-A2 : Line starting from point Al in mouza Harkatta No-4 , P.S. Lalmatia, Boarijor , Dist . Godda , Plot No 510 passing through plot no . 532 , crossing the River (689 ) and passing through Plot no . 15 ofmouza Bara Khairbani nó. 5 and passing through plot no . 16 , 18 , 19,20,171,68,36,37,39,40,38,45, 44, 46, 170 and meet at point A2 in the common boundary line ofmouza Bara Khairbani no.5 and Lilatari no . 11 .
A2 -A3: Line starting from point A 2 in Common boundary line ofmouza Bara Khairbani no.5 & Lilatari no . 11 and passing through plot no . 2, 8 , 9 , 19 , 20, 27, 26, 29, 53 , 41 , 42, 43 , 102, 150, 139, 148, 143, 142, 141 , 114,673, 774,771,772, 773 , 768,767,766,763 , 750 , 751,758,756,755,726, 728 , 724, 718,715, 713,712, 710, 709,874,875,876,879,878 , 886, 887, 889, 672, 645,646 , 456, 600 , 598 , 607 and meets at point A3 in plot no . 1182 of mouza Lilatori No. 11
A3 A4 : Line starting from point A3 in plot no . 1182 of mouza Lilatori no . Il and passing through plot no. 1183 , 594 , 596, 597, 580, 581,573 , 572 , 570 , 566 and crossing the common boundary of mouza Lilatori no . 11 & mouza Hurra no.36 & passing through plot nos . 247, 246, 245, 243, 22 , 24, 25, 26 and meets at point A 4 in plot no . 132 of mouzaHurra no. 36.
A4-A5 : Line starting from point A4 in plot no . 132 of mouza Hurra no . 36 and passing through plot no . 26, 82, 83 , 87, 80, 79 , 77, 75, 95, 225, 96 , 97 , 98 , 104 , 99, 176, 179, 178 , 278 , 314, 312 , 304 and meets at point A 5 in common boudary of mouza Hurra no . 36 & Forest Block no . Nil .
15-16 : Line starting from point A5 in comnon boudary of mouza Hurra no . 36 & Jungle Block no.- nil and again passing through plot no . Nil of Jungle Block no.- nil and crossing the common boudary of mouza Hurra no . 36 & Jungle Block no.- nil & passing through plot no. 332, 319 , 324 mouza hurra no.36 & meets at point A 6 in common boundary ofmouza Hurra no. 36 & mouza Fulberia no. 35 9452
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii)] A6-A7 : Line starting from point A6 in common boundary of Mouza Hurra no . 36 & Mouza Fulberia no . 35 and passing through plot no . 737,736, 735, 734, 733 , 706, 561 and meets at point A 7 in plot no . 562 of Mouza Fulberia no . 35 .
A7-A8: Line starting from A7 in plot no . 562 in Mouza Fulberia no. 35 & passing through plot no . 26, 378 , 374, 206, 207, 208 , 210,229,228 , 230, 232, 234, 254, 250, 245 , 244, 151 , 107, 1 and meets at point A8 in common boundary line ofmouza Fulbaria No.35 & mouza Haripur no . 12
A8-A9 Line starting from point A8 in common boundary line of mouza Fulbaria No.35 & Haripur No.12 and passing through plot No.1 of mouza Haripur no . 12 & meets at point A9 in common boundary of mouza Haripur no . 12 & Mouza Piaram No. 34.
A9-A10 : Line starting from point A9 in Common boundary of Mouza Haripur no . 12 & Mouza Piaram No.34 & passing through plot no 522 and meets at point Alo at common boundary of Mouzą Piaram No.34 & Mouza Chota Khairbani No. 16 .
A10 -A11: Line starting from point A10 at common boundary of Mouza Piaram No.34 & Mouza Chota Khairbani No. 16 . passing along with the common boundary line of Mouza Piaram No. 34 & Mouza Chota Khairbani No.16 crossing through plot no .469 ofmouza piaram no . 34 and passing along with plot no . 67 of mouza chota kherbani no . 16 and again passing through plot no . 522,470 and again meets at meets at point A 11 on the plot no.470 of mouza Piaram No.34.
A11 -A12: Line starting from A 11 in mouza Piaram No.34 plot no. 470 and passing along with the common boundary of mouza Hahajor no . 13 & Rangamatia No. 15 and meets at point A 12 .
A12-A13 : Line starting from point A 12 at common boundary of mouza Rangamatia No. 15 & Hahajor No. 13.passing through western boundary of plot no . 74 , and meets at point A 13 in western boundary of same plot no . 74 of Mouza HahajorNo. 13.
A13 -A14 : Line starting frorn A 13 in western boundary of plot no 74 of Mouza Hahajor No. 13 , passing through plot no- 60, 62, 64 and meets at point A14 in plot no . 66 of Mouza Hahajor no. 13 .
A14-A15 : Line starting frorn point A 14 in plot no. 66 of Mouza Hahajor No.13 , and passing through western boundary of plot no. 56, 55, 54, 39 , 40, 73 , 29, 28 , 26 , 25 , 24, 23 of Mouza Hahajor No. 13 and meets at point A15 of plot no . 20 ofMouza Hahajor No. 13 .
A15 -A16: Line starting from A 15 in western boundary of plot no . 20 of Mouza Hahajor No.13 and passing through plot no- 20 , 73 , 17, 16, 14, 13, 9 and meets at point A16 in western boundary ofplot no . 8 of Mouza Hahajor No. 13 .
A16-A17: Line starting from point A 16 of plot no . 8 of Mouza Hahajor no. 13 and passing through plot no . 8 , 6 , 5 , 4 , 3 , 2 and crossing the common boundary line of Mouza Hahajor No. 13 & Dumaria No.1 and passing through western boundary ofplot no . 1190 , 1227 , and meets at point A 17 in plot no . 1191 of Mouza Dumaria No. 1 .
A17-A1 8: Line starting from point A 17 in Eastern boundary of plot no. 1191 of Mouza Dumaria No. 1 and passing throgh plot no . 1191,1194 and meets at point at. A18 in the eastern boundary plot no . 1195 of Mouza Dumaria No.1 .
A18-A19 : Line starting from point A 18 in the eastern boundary plot no . 1195 ofMouza Dumaria No. 1 and passing through plot no 1195, 1198 , 1226 , 1224 and meets at point A 19 in plot no . 1223 of Mouza Dumaria No. 1. & common boundary line of Mouza Dumuria no . 1 & Harkatta no . 4
A19- A1 : Line starting from point A 19 of plot no . 1223 of Mouza Dumaria no . 1.& passing along with plot no . 1223 , 1222, 1221 , 1220 of Mouza Dumaria no - I and passing through the common boudary line of Mouza Dumuria no . 1 & Harkatta no . 4 and again passing through plot no . 695 , 503 , 505, 509 of Mouza Harkatta no. 4 and meetsat point A 1 in plot no . 510 of Mouza Harkatta No.4 .
[No. 43015 / 1 /2006/PRIW - 1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 12 नवम्बर , 2007
: का. आ. 3319- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. और तारीख की नीचे दी गई अनुसूची में यथा , उल्लेखित तारीख की अधिसूचना का.आ. संख्या द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि के अधिकार के अर्जन का अधिकार प्राप्त किया था । [ भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
9453
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमियों में जो सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्तहैं , उपयोग का अधिकार , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि सिद्धपुर सांगानेर पाइप लाइन से चित्तोड़गढ़ ब्रान्च लाइन पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के प्रयोजन के लिए राजस्थान राज्य के अनुसूची में उक्त तहसील ब्यावर , मसूदा जिला अजमेर, तहसील आसीन्द , माण्डल , भीलवाड़ा जिला भीलवाड़ा, तहसील राशमी , गंगरार, चित्तोड़गढ़ जिला चित्तोड़गढ़ तहसील के ग्रामों की भूमियों में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है । अतः इन भूमियों में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की जाए जिसका संक्षिप्त विवरण इस अधिसूचना की संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट किया जाता है ।
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियम, 1963 के नियम 4 , के स्पष्टीकरण -1 अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लेखित तारीख की प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों के रूप में घोषित करती हैं ।
अनुसूची
गांव का नाम
तहसील क्रम सं.
धारा 6 ( 1 ) की का.आ.सं. एवंदिनांक
2
3
4 1
1 1390 दिनांक 12-4-05
ब्यावर
सेंसधुरा
लसाडिया
1390 दिनांक12-4-05
1390 दिनांक 12-4-05 खिरनीखेड़ा
पाखरियावास
1390 दिनांक12-4-05
बाडिया भाउ
1390दिनांक 12-4-05
2.
अन्धेरी देवरी
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
मसूदा 1602दिनांक 25-4-05
श्यामगढ़
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
खीमपुरा
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
कुमभुरा
चोदसिया
1602 दिनांक 25-4-05
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
लूलवा
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
कांकरनाड़ी
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
प्रतापपुरा -1
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
देवीपुरा
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
उत्त्तभी
1602दिनांक 25-4-05 दोलतपुरा
1602दिनांक 25-4-05 रेनपुरा
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
कानपुरा
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
जीवाना
देवास
1602 दिनांक 25-4-05
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
अमरपुरा
अकरोल
1602दिनांक 25-4-05
3 1706 दिनांक4-05-05
आसीन्द
रामपुरा
1706दिनांक 4-05-05
अखेगढ़
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
मोटरास
-वही-
1138 दिनांक 21-3-06
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
सग्रामगढ़
1138 दिनांक 21-3-06
-वही-
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
भैंरूखेड़ा
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05 गजसिंहपुरा
1706 दिनांक4-05-05
शम्भूगढ़
बरसनी
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
1138 दिनांक 21-3-06
-वही-
जिला
राज्य
प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख
6
5
7
29-6-2006 अजमेर
राजस्थान
27-7-2006
27-7-2006.
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-6-2006
24-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-6-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-6-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
25-7-2006
27-7-2006 भीलवाड़ा
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
26-7-2006
11 9454
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/ KARTIKA 26, 1929
1
2
4
3
3 1706 दिनांक4-05-05
आसीन्द
कोलीखेड़ा
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
आमेसर
1138 दिनांक 21-3-06
-वही-
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
माताजी का खेड़ा 1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
जबरकिया
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
पालड़ी
सरेरी
1706 दिनांक 4-05-05
1706दिनांक4-05-05
कोश्नास
4
हिणिया
माण्डल 1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05 सोदानपुरा
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
भगवानपुरा
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
सूरजपुरा
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
भीमड़ियास
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
राजपुरा
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
थोब का खेड़ा
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
थाबोला
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
भालडी खेड़ा
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
भादू
2069दिनांक 25-5-06
भादू
3130 दिनांक 10-8-06
भादू
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05 घोडास
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
पींथास
1795 दिनांक 10-5-05
अमरगढ़
5
कोचरिया
1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
भीलवाड़ा 1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
सुन्दरपुरा
1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
मुझरास
3129 दिनांक 10-8-06
मुझरास
नोगावां
1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
भोपालगढ़
1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
थंला का खेड़ा 1908 दिनांक 24-5-05
जवासिया
6 1908 दिनांक 24-5-05 छाछेड़ी
नेवरिया
1603 दिनांक 25-4-05
रशमी 1603 दिनांक 25-4-05
माताजी का मण्डपिया रशमी 7 3015 दिनांक 24-8-05
गगरार
कासेड़ी
3015 दिनांक 24-8-05
बूढ़
3015 दिनांक 24-8-05 जयसिंहपुरा
3015 दिनांक 24-8-05 सुदरी
3015 दिनांक 24-8-05
ऐरा
3015 दिनांक 24-8-05
गुरजनिया
बोलो का सावंता 3015 दिनांक 24-8-05
8 3015 दिनांक 24-8-05 तालेड़ी
बडोदिया
3014 दिनांक 24-8-05
चित्तौड़गढ़
बडोदिया
4756 दिनांक22-12-05
3014 दिनांक 24-8-05
कसाराखेड़ी
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
6
5
7
राजस्थान
26-7-2006 भीलवाड़ा
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-9-2006
29-6-2006
29-6-2006
25-7-2006
24-7-2006
10-7-2006
29-7-2006
12-10-2006
29-6-2006
10-7-2006
10-7-2006
27-7-2006 भीलवाड़ा
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-10-2006
10-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-7-2006
24-7-2006
i
29-7-2006 चित्तौड़गढ़
24-7-2006
27-7-2006
! 27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-7-2006
27-7-2006
24-7-2006
27-7-2006 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
9455
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
3
1
2
4 8 3014दिनांक 24-8-05
चित्तौड़गढ़
रोलाहेड़ा
3014दिनांक 24-8-05 दोलतपुरा
3014दिनांक 24-8-05 पाण्डोली
पाण्डोली
1139 दिनांक 21-3-06
3014दिनांक 24-8-05 नरपत की खेड़ी 3014दिनांक 24-8-05 गणेशपुरा
3014दिनांक 24-8-05 धनेतकला
3014दिनांक 24-8-05 लालजी का खेड़ा
सेन्ती
3014दिनांक 24-8-05
3014 दिनांक 24-8-05 बोजून्दा
3014 दिनांक 24-8-05 सेगवा
3014 दिनांक 24-8-05 ओखड़ी
3014 दिनांक 24-8-05
जालमपुरा
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS
6
5
7
राजस्थान
10-7-2006 चित्तौड़गढ़
27-7-2006
7-8-2006
7-8-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
5-8-2006
4-8-2006
27-7-2006 [फा. सं. आर. - 25011/ 12/07 ओआर-1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 12th November, 2007
S.O. 3319. -Whereas , by the notifications ofthe Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, S.O. Number and date as mentioned in the schedule below issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government acquired the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to those notification ;
And whereas , in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government vested the right of user in said lands , free from all encumbrances , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
Andwhereas, the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose oftransport ofpetroleum products in Respect of Branch Pipeline to Chittaurgarh from Sidhpur -Sanganer Pipeline State ofRajasthan through the Villages in Tehsil Beawar , Masuda District Ajmer , Tehsil Asind, Mandal , Bhilwara District Bhilwara, Tehsil Rashmi , Gangrar, Chittaurgarh District Chittaurgarh Tehsil in the State of Rajasthan mentioned in the schedule has been laid in the said lands , so the operation may be terminated in respect of the ROW ( Right of Way ) in land, description ofwhich in brief is specified in the schedule annexed to this notification.
Nowtherefore , as required under explanation -1 of rule 4 the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land ) rules , 1963 the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in Column 7 of the said Schedule as thedates oftermination of operation.
"Schedule Annexed"
Tehsil
Name ofvillage S.O. No.
Date of under sub-section (1) ofSection 6
2
1
4
3
1
Beawar
1390 Date 12-4-05
Senspura
1390 Date 12-4-05
Lasariya
Khirani Khera 1390 Date 12-4-05
1390 Date 12-4-05
Pakhariyawas 1390 Date 12-4-05
BadiyaBhau 2
Masuda
Andheri Devri 1602 Date 25-4-05
1602 Date 25-4-05
Shyarngarh 1602 Date 25-4-05
Khimpura
1602 Date 25-4-05
Kumpura
1602 Date 25-4-05
Chaudasiya 1602Date 25-4-05
Lulwa
Kankadnari 1602 Date 25-4-05
4506 G1/07-9
State
District
Closingdate
6
7
5
29-6-2006
Rajasthan
Ajmer
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-6-2006
24-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006 9456
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
2
1
4
3
1602Date25-4-05
Masuda
Pratappura - 1 1602 Date 25-4-05
Devipura
Uttami 1602Date25-4-05
1602Date25-4-05
Daulatpura 1602 Date 25-4-05
Renpura 1602 Date 25-4-05
Kanpura
Jiwana 1602Date25-4-05
1602Date 25-4-05
Devas 1602Date 25-4-05
Amarpura
Akrol 1602Date25-4-05
3 1706Date04-05-05
Asind
Rampura 1706Date04-05-05
Akhegarh
Motras 1706Date04-05-05
Motras 1138Date 21-03-06
1706Date04-05-05
Sangramgarh 1138 Date21-03-06
Sangramgarh 1706Date04-05-05
Bhairukhera 1706Date 04-05-05
Gajsinghpura 1706Date 04-05-05
Shambhugarh 1706Date04-05-05
Barsani
Barsani 1138 Date 21-03-06
1706Date 04-05-05
Kolikhera
Amesar 1706Date04-05-05
Amesar 1138Date21-3-06
1706Date04-05-05
Matajikakhera 1706Date04-05-05
Jabrakiya
Palri
1706Date04-05-05
Sareri 1706Date04-05-05
Kornas 1706 Date04-05-05
4
Mandal
1795Date 10-05-05
Hisaniya 1795Date10-05-05
Sodanpura 1795 Date 10-05-05
Bhagwanpura 1795 Date 10-05-05
Surajpura 1795 Date 10-05-05
Bhimadiyas 1795Date10-05-05
Rajpura 1795Date 10-05-05
Thob ka khera
Thabola 1795 Date 10-05-05
1795 Date 10-05-05
Bhalari Khera
Bhadu 1795Date 10-05-05
2069Date25-05-06
Bhadu
Bhadu 3130Date10-08-06
1795 Date 10-05-05
Ghoras 1795 Date 10-05-05
Pithas 1795Date10-05-05
Amargarh !
5 1908 Date 24-05-05
Bhilwara
Kochariya 1908 Date 24-05-05
Sunderpura 1908 Date 24-05-05
Mujaras 3129 Date 10-08-06
Mujaras 1908 Date 24-05-05
Nouagoan 1908 Date 24-05-05
Bhupalgarh 1908 Date24-05-05
Thalon ka khera 1908 Date 24-05-05
Javasiya 1908 Date 24-05-05
Chhachoeri
[PART II-SEC.3 ( ii) ]
6
5
7
29-6-2006 Rajasthan
Ajmer
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-6-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
25-7-2006
27-7-2006 Bhilwara
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
1
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
1
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
26-7-2006
26-7-2006
26-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006 Bhilwara
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
29-6-2006
29-6-2006
29-6-2006
25-7-2006
24-7-2006
10-7-2006
29-7-2006
12-10-2006
12-10-2006
29-6-2006
10-7-2006
10-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-10-2006
10-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-7-2006
24-7-2006 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9457
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
1
2
3
6 1603 Date 25-04-05
Neveriya
Matajika
Mandpiya 7 3015 Date 24-08-05
Kaseri
Budh 3015 Date 24-08-05
3015 Date 24-08-05
Jaisinghpura
Sudri 3015 Date 24-08-05
3015 Date 24-08-05
Era
3015 Date 24-08-05
Gurjaniya 3015 Date 24-08-05
BolaKa Sanvta
Taleri 3015 Date 24-08-05
8 3014 Date 24-08-05
Badodiya 4756Date 22-12-05
Badodiya
Kasarakheri 3014Date 24-08-05
3014 Date 24-08-05
Rolahera
7
4
5
6
29-7-2006
Rashmi
24-7-2006
Gangrar
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-7-2006 Chittaurgarh
27-7-2006
24-7-2006 Rajasthan
24-7-2006
27-7-2006
10-7-2006
Chittaurgarh
3014Date 24-08-05
Dolatpura 3014Date 24-08-05
Pandoli 1139 Date 21-03-06
Pandoli 3014Date 24-08-05
Narpatkikheri 3014 Date 24-08-05
Ganeshpura 3014 Date 24-08-05
Dhanerkalan 3014 Date 24-08-05
Laljikakhera
Senti 3014 Date 24-08-05
3014 Date 24-08-05
Bojunda 3014 Date 24-08-05
Segva 3014 Date 24-08-05
Ochhari 3014 Date 24-08-05
Jalampura
27-7-2006
7-08-2006
7-08-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
27-7-2006
5-08-2006
4-08-2006
27-7-2006
[F. No. R-25011 /12/2007 -OR- I] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2007
का. आ. 3320.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण मे , आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य क्षेत्र के भीतर , उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन , भारत सस्कार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 832 दिनांक 2 अप्रैल , 2004 द्वारा प्राधिकृत श्री एन. कृष्ण के स्थान पर श्री टी. अप्पा राव , विशेष श्रेणी उप समाहर्ता , आन्ध्र प्रदेश सरकार , को हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की विशाख- विजयवाडा सिकन्द्राबाद पाइपलाइन के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[फा. सं. आर-31015/ 11 /2003 - ओ आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
NewDelhi, the 16th November , 2007
S.O. 3320.- In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri T. Appa Rao, Special Grade Deputy Collector , Government of Andhra Pradesh to Perform the functions of competent authority under the said Act within the territory of the State of Andhra Pradesh for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited's Visakh- Vijayawada- Secunderabad Pipeline in place of Shri N. Krishna authorized vide notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, number S.O. 832 dated the 2nd April, 2004.
[F.No. R-31015/11/2003-OR- II] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
9458
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKΑ 26, 1929
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नईदिल्ली , 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3321. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 काः 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशमल एयरपोर्ट अथोरिटी कानपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या आई..डी सं. - 72/ 1988 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] ultimately allowedby the Hon'ble High Court by order dated 29-7-05 and the award of this tribunal was set aside andthe casewas remanded back to the tribunal for deciding the same afresh after, providing opportunities ofhearingto the contesting parties.
3. After receipt of judgment of the Hon'ble High Court contesting parties were directed by the tribunal to filerelevantdocuments lying in their possession connected with the present case for reconstructing the file as per officereport earlier case file stands weeded out .
[सं. एल-11012/18/87-III (B ) ]
एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्कअधिकारी
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 23rd October , 2007
S.O 3321.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. No. 72/1988) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Labour Court, Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Naltional Airport Authority, Kanpur and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007.
[No. L- 11012/ 18/87-III (B)]
N. S. BORA, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRIR. G. SHUKLA, PRESEDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, KANPUR, U.P. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 72 OF 1988 Inthe matter ofdespute between:- Sri Jagratan son ofBachchi QuarterNo.18 Sihavali Tatia ShyamNagar, Kanpur. And The Aerodrome Officer National Airport Authority CivilAerodrome Kanpur.
AWARD
1.The Central Government, Ministry of Labour, vide notification No. L- 11012/ 18/87 - III (B) dated 3-6-88 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:-
"Whether the action of the management of National AirportAuthority Kanpur in terminating the services ofSri Jagratan w.e.f. 15-8-84 is legal/justified ? It not towhat relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date ?"
2.At the out set it may pointed out that an exparte award was recorded by this tribunal on 28-10-85 and the workman was allowed reinstatement. Management being aggrieved by the said award assailed the same before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by filing Civil Misc . Writ Petition No. 12781 of 89 which was 4.Case as set up by the workman in short is that he was appointed as casual workman by Civil Aviation Department which is functioning under National Airport Authority, Kanpur . It is alleged that he also use to perform the work of chowkidar . It is also alleged that during the entire period ofhis service he was never issued any charge sheet or memo . Although the workman was working continuously still his services were terminated w.e.f. 15-8-84by the opposite party. It is further pleaded that the workmanworked more than 240 days ofcontinuous service, therefore, provisions of Section 25-F of I.D. Act became applicable in his case. The opposite party did not follow Section 25-F in the case of the workman therefore, he is entitled for his regularisation. It has also been claimedby the workman that his termination is illegal unwarranted and against the laid down principles of natural justice therefore, he is entitled to be reinstated in the service of the opposite party with full back wages , continuity of service and all consequential benefits.
4A. Opposite party contested the claim of the workman on variety of grounds interalis alleging that the workmanwas never engaged or appointed by the National Airport Authority Kanpur . As a matter of fact National Airport Authority , Kanpur , took the charge of the employees ofCivil Aviation Department in the year 1986 , and at that relevant time the workman was not in the employment of Civil Aviation Department nor his any dispute was pending in the court and as such no responsibility or liability of the workman was taken by National Airport Authority, Kanpur . Therefore , in the facts and circumstances , reference before this tribunal is not maintainable under the provisions ofthe Act . On merit entire allegations made by the workman has been denied by the opposite party for want knowledge . On the basis of above it has been prayed that the claim ofthe workman be dismissed, 5.After exchange ofpleadings between the parties, both contesting parties adduced their oral as well as documentary evidence in support of their claims and counter claims .
6.Tribunal hasheard the arguments ofthe contesting parties at length and have also examinedthe file carefully.
7.Workman Jagratan has examined himself on oath before the tribunal and in his examination in chief he has stated that he entered in the services of the opposite party on 2-5-81 as a casual worker and was made permanent on 13-5-82.He goes on to state that w.e.f. 14-8-84 his services wereterminated by the opposite party. He has futher stated inhis evidence that the tribunal gave award in his favour whichwas challenged by the opposite partybefore Hon'ble [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
High Court . Witness has admitted the fact that the Hon'ble High Court remanded back the case before the Tribunal for hearing afresh. He goes on to state that alongwith statement of claim he filed a document in the shape of photocopy original ofwhich is with him. Witness has clearly admitted the fact that at serial no . 3 of the document no date is metioned for his regularisation in the service.
8. Witness in his cross -examination has clearly admitted that document Ext. W.1 has been issued by Civil Aviation Department . Airport Authority of India has not beenmade a party in the present case . Witness expressed his ignorance about the date when the employees of civil aviation department were taken by the Airport Authority. Witness has clearly denied the suggestion that National Airport Authority had never given him wages.
9. During the course of the arguments of the case attention of the tribunal was pinpointed on the original document dated 12th September , 1984, purported to have been issued by Civil Aviation Department, which clearly shows that the workman was engaged as daily rated worker atthe post of Chowkidar but column no . 3 of the letter indicate that there no mention of date on which workman was made regular chowkidar ,
10. Therefore, from the own pleading and evidence ofthe workman it stands established that he was a casual worker on daily rate basis engaged by the Civil Aviation Department . From the evidence of the workman it is not established that he ever completed 240 days or more in one calander year . The documentary evidence ofthe workman cannot be believed in view of his oral evidence and the workman has palpably failed to prove his case that he was evermade regular or permanent against any post. It is settled legal position that casual or daily rated workers have neither any lein against any post nor they can claim appointment or regularisation on any post . His claim can also not be believed because of reason that he in his pleading as well as in his evidence has clearly admitted himself to be a casualworker paid on daily wage basis . This is sufficient to hold that he not having any right or title to claim his reinstatement on any post under the opposite party.
11. Once having concluded that the states of the workman was of casual labour on daily rate basis , the evidence of the opposite party is being ignored as the workman has failed to prove his case.
9459
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
ofthe above discussion is that the workman is not held entitled for any relief as claimed by him pursuant to the present reference order. Accordingly reference is answered against him and in favour of the opposite party.
R. G. SHUKLA, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3322.-औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ सी ओ आर , भद्रक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी.सं. 117/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 0-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[फा. सं. एल-29011/40/96- आई आर( एम ) ] एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 23rd October , 2007
S.O. 3322.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I. D. No. 117/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FACOR, Bhadrak and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007 .
[FileNo. L-29011/40/96-IR(M) ] N. S. BORA, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
PRESENT: Shri N.K.R.Mohapatra,
Presiding Officer , C.G.I.T. -cum -Labour court Bhubaneswar.
Tr. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 117/2001 Date ofPassing Award - 24th September,2007 BETWEEN:
TheManagement of the Chief Executive (Mines), FACOR, Kuans , Bhadrak.
... IstParty- Management
(And)
Their Workman , represented through
TheGeneral Secretary, Chrome Zone Employees Union, P.O. Soso, Dist. Keonjhar.
2ndParty-Union .
APPEARANCES:
Shri Ashok Kr . Mishra.
Forthe 1st Party- Management.
Authorized Representative
12. Worker'sfurther claim that since he had rendered more than 240 days of continuous service he has become entitle for his regularisation . On this point the claim ofthe workman cannot be sustained in the eye oflaw. It is settled principle of law that mere completion of 240 days of continuous service Section 25F of I.D. Act would not come into play automatically unless it is proved that the service conditions governing such workman is against the wishes of Section 25F of I.D. Act. In the instant case the workman has absolutely failed to prove that he ever completed two fourty days of continuous service protection of Section 25F of the Act is not applicable to the workman.
13. For the reasons discussed above, it is held that the action of the management ofNational Airport Authority Kanpur, in terminating the services of Sri Jagratan w.e.f. 15-8-84 is neither illegal nor unjustified. The resultant effect
For the 2nd Party- Union.
Shri Ashok Kr . Rout , General Secretary.
AWARD
TheGovernment of India in the Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofpowers conferred by Clause (d) ofsub- section 9460
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKΑ 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] =
Party?
(1) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial DisputeAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L -29011 /40/ 96- IR(Misc.), dated 20-2-1997.
4. Whether the demand of the workman namely. Shri S.K. Sahoo and 10 others for reinstatement in the establishment of Boula Chromite Mines of M/ s . FACOR with full back wages isjustified?
5. Whether the workmen are entitled to any relief ?
"Whether the demand of the workman namely Shri $. K. Sahoo and 10 others ( as per list) for reinstatement in the establishment of Boula Chromite Mines of M/ s . FACOR with full back wages is justified ? If so to what relief the workman are entitled?"
5. The record discloses that after examination and cross-examination of three of the disputants neither the Union nor the Management could appear and take any steps for which their cases were closed for award with the available meterials on record .
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO . 1
6. No evidence having been adduced by the Management challenging the above issues , the same is answered affirmatively.
ISSUE NO. 3 to5
7. These issues being inter- linked are taken up together.
As stated earlier the 2nd Party- Union has alone examined three of the disputants as W.W- 1 W.W. -2 and W.W. - 3 besides producing some documents to establish that the Management had engaged the disputants directly colouring them as contract labourers and therefore their termination by the Management was bad under law.
2. It is claimed by the Union in its Claim Statement and the complaint lodged before the Asst . Labour Commissioner (Central) that the above noted workerswere engaged by the Management after necessary test during 1988 to 1990 to work in its Boula Chromite Mines in defferent capacities as reflected in the list of workers supplied by the Government. Though they were engaged as regular workers no appointment letter were issued to them. Even though they were working under the direct control of the Management they were shown simply as Contract Labourers . It is alleged by the Union that while these workers were under continuous employment ever since their appointment, the Management without assigning any reason retrenched them all of a sudden verballyfrom7-11- 1993 without any retrenchment benefits . As a result an Industrial Dispute was raised by the Union two years later challenging the above action of the Management , culminating the same in the present reference.
8. To justify the above stand ofthe Union W.W. - 1 to3 have categorically stated that they and other disputants were recruitedby the Management but they were not issued withany appointment letter. According to them after such recruitment their work and attendance were controlled by the Time Office and so much so they were also allowed to draw T.A. and other monetary benefits from the Management . According to them at the time of disbursement ofwages the so-called contractor simply used to sit in the payment counter but in practice they were paid bytheManagement. It is also claimed that they were issued with tokens instead of gate passes to enter the mine and that they were being supplied with safety appliances by theManagement itself, Except on the payment day the so- called contractor never used to show his face nor did he ever instruct or direct them to do a particular job or come on inspection oftheir performances. It is also stated by the witnesses they were availing all welfare amenities of the Management Company and that their photos also find place in the statutory registers maintained by the Time Office and that accordingly their daily attendance was also taken bythat office.
3. In reply to the above , the Management in his written statement contended that the desputants -workers were of a contractor and therefore , the question of the Management refusing themem employment deos not arise . It is futher averred that since the concerned contractor has not been impleaded as a party , the entire reference is not maintainable under law. In its written statement filed before the conciliation officer it is further contended by the Management that as these workers were engaged in mines , theywere provided with some of the benefits as prescribed under the Mines Act but on that basis they cannot be considered as employees of the Management . It is further contended that these workers were never recruited by the Management as alleged by the Union nor they were working under the direct supervision of the Management . It is further contended that the Union in question was a defunct organization by the time the dispute was raised and therefore the authorized representative of the workers (the General Secretary of the Union in question) has no locustandy to file the Claim Statement on behalf of the disputants -workmen .
4. On the basis of above pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed.
ISSUES
1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?
2. Whether the instant dispute is an Industrial Dispute within the meaning of Section 2 (K) of the Industrial Disputes Act ?
9.During cross -examination of these witnesses they were simply confronted with negative suggestion but no evidence worth the name has been produced by the Managementto disprove their evidence . Ext . -2 shows that the disputant, Rabindra Kumar Barik was issued with a letter ofappointment under M.M. Regulation 39 of 1981 , suggesting that he was not engaged by any contractor . The conciliation file which has been called for from the R.L.C. (C) shows that the Management had filed his written statement before the said authority denying the various points raised by the Union in its complaint made to that authority. In the said written statement the Management is 3. Whether any Employer- Employee relationship exists between the disputants and the 1st 9461 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
as to why the certificates marked as Ext. - 1 and 3 issued in the official pad of the Chief Geologist shall not be made good use of in favour of the disputants . As these certificates do not indicate that two disputants (W.W. -2 and 3) were contract labourers , taking into considerations the earlier discussions made in the foregoing paras , I find no other go but to hold that the entire group of disputants were not the contract labourers but were the indirect workers of the Management engaged through sham contractors .
found tohave admitted indirectly that the disputant daily attendance were taken by the Time Office and they were also issued with safety appliances . It has further been admitted that persons like disputants were also allowedby the Management to avail family planning incentives in a reduced rate under its scheme meant for direct and indirect workers . This very averment shows that the disputants were treated as indirect workers but not as the workers of any contractor , paving to the conclusion that the contractor named by the Management are all sham and camouflaged persons.
11. It be pointed out here that right from the stage of raising the dispute before the Asst. Labour Commissioner (Central) down to the enquiry stage , the Management is consistently taking a stand that the disputants were engaged through contractor, but no where it has whispered a word that the Management and as well as the so-called contractor M/ s . Agrawal Brothers had possessed of necessary labour license to engage contract workers . Moreover as the Management has also not come forward to prove that the disputants were of contractor M/ s . Agrawal Brothers , I believe that the entire stand takenby the Management is a myth and nothing but a myth .
12. It is no doubt true that the name of the above contractor finds place in the last column of the list of disputants supplied by the Government . But the evidence of the Union shows that the said list was supplied to the Government by the Union. When the Management claims that the disputants were of contractor M/ s . Agrawal Brothers , it is very obvious for the Union to maintain such name in the list and therefore it can not be used as a piece of evidence against any party .
13. Thus in view of the discussions made above it is held that the disputants were engaged by the Management through a sham contractor and therefore their termination without terminal benefits ( as admitted by both party) is held tobe bad under law. The Management is accordingly directed to reinstate them in their former post with 50% backwages calculated from the date of their termination on 7-11-1993 .
14. The reference is answered accordingly. Dictated& Corrected by me.
N. K. R. MOHAPATRA , Presiding Officer
LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PARTY -UNION
Workman Witness No. 1- Shri Sarat Kumar Sahoo . WorkmanWitness No.2 - Shri Niranjan Sahoo.
Workman Witness No.3 - Shri Rabindra Kumar Barik. LIST OF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PARTY-UNION
Ext.- 1 - Letter/Certificate dated 30th December ofChief Geologist , Boula Chromite Mines of M/ s . FACOR for Niranjan Sahoo..
10.M.O. - I and II are the silver tokens produced by W. W. -2 and 3 claiming to have had received the same from the Management . These M.Os contains the name of the Management besides a number and during cross- examination the genuine - ness of the same has not been questioned by the Management . Therefore, the very issuance of such token suggests that the disputants were not of any contractor but they were working as " Indirect workers of the Management" . Had they really been the workers of any contractor , they would have been issued with gate passes instead of a metallic token like M.O. - I and II which are normally issued to a regular worker for their day to day entry into a mine . Further the Union has filed two sample service certificates (Ext. - 1 and 3) granted by the ChiefGeologist ofthe Management -Company in favour of disputant Niranjan Sahoo ( W.W. - 2) and Rabindra Kumar Barik (W.W. -3 ) . The genuine- ness of these documents was questioned by the Management during cross - examination on the ground that the ChiefGeologist was not competent to issue such certificates . The conciliation file shows that in its written statement filed before the Asst . Labour Commissioner (Central ) the Management had questioned the genuine-ness of these certificates saying that the departmental head like ChiefGeologist are not competent to issue any experience certificate in his letter pad . Tojustify the same one sample certificate issued by Senior Manager, Personnel to one Purna Chandra Jena was filed before the Asst . Labour Commissioner ( Central) . While filing such sample certificate it was contended that service certificates are only issued to direct employees in a letter pad containing the emblem of the Management but not in the official letter pad of the departmental Head as has been issued to the disputants . It be mentioned here that the averment of the Management at Para - 7 of its written statement filed before the Asst . Labour Commissioner (Central) shows that the Management had direct and indirect employees and persons like disputants were given family planning incentives at par with an indirect worker . Therefore, it is but natural for the Management to adopt two different types of methods of issuing such certificate. Besides the record shows that a service certificate has infact been issued to the disputant Laxman Rout in an official 'pad containing the emblem of the Management. This document has of course not been marked as exhibits but its, collateral use indicates that the Management has got no fixed principle of issuing such certificates in a given style . Therefore the service certificates granted to the disputants can not be thrown aside as unreliable when according to the Management service certificates are also issued to its retrenched/ex -employees , I find no justification
Ext. -2 - Form of Appointment of competent persons dated 23-7-1990 . } 9462.
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
TheirWorkmen,
Represented through the
Ext.-3- Certificate dated 6-12-1993 ofChiefGeologist, Boula Chromite Mines of FACOR for Mr. Rabindra Kumar Barik
UNION LIST OF MOS ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PARTY-
VicePresident, Paradip Port &DockMazdoor Union, 58, Diamond HarbourRoad, Calcutta-700023 .
2ndParty-Union
Appearances:
M.O.- 1 - Token No. 7930 ofBoula Chromite Mines of FACOR, in respect of Shri. Niranjan Sahoo.
M/s. H. K. Mohanty, Advocate.
Forthe 1st party Management.
M.O.-2 - Token No. 7493 ofBola Chromite Mines of FACOR in respect of Shri Rabindra KumarBarik.
Forthe 2nd Party
M/ s. Subhasish Das,. Advocate
Union
LIST OF WITNESSES ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST PARTYMANAGEMENT
AWARD
No Witness Examined on behalf of the Management.
LIST OF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OFTHE ISTPARTY-MANAGEMENT
No documents exhibited on behalf of the Management.
नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
TheGovernment of India in the Ministry of Labour , inexercise ofpowers conferredby Clause(d) of sub -section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No.L- 38011/2/98/ IR(M), dated20-07-1998:-
"Whether the demand of Paradip Port & Dock Mazdoor Union for regularization of 70 Railway Maintenance Mazdoors (as per list enclosed) who are engaged in permanent and perennial nature of work since 1990 by the Management of Paradip Port Trust is justified? If so, to what relief the workmen are entitled?"
का.आ. 3323. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पारादीप पोर्ट ट्रस्ट, पारादीप के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी. सं. 177/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-38011/2/1998- आई आर( एम) ] एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd October , 2007
S.O. 3323.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1.D. No. 177/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Paradip Port Trust, Paradip, and their workman, which was received by theCentral Government on 23-10-2007.
[File No. L-38011 /2/98- IR (M) ]
N. S. BORA, DeskOfficer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
PRESENT:
Shri N. K. R. Mohapatra ,
PresidingOfficer,
C.GI.T. -cum -Labour court, Bhubaneswar.
Tr . CASE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 177/2001
Date ofPassing Award-28th September 2007
Between:
TheManagement of the Chairman,
ParadipPort Trust,
Paradip-754442.
...1stParty Management
2. Admittedly the Paradip Port Trust constituted under theMajor Port Trust Act, 1963 is in Management of ParadipPort situated in Orissa. The said Port - Management is inter -aliaresponsible for loading and unloading ofexports and import cargoes on to or from the vessels calling at the port. For smoother carriage of the cargoes the Port has its own railway tracks upto Rangiagarh Railway Station of SouthEastern Railways from where the rakes of the Railway Wagons are taken over and returned back by the said Port Management. For the above purpose it has got a set of permanent staff like Traffic Points Man, Gateman, Sealer, Head Number Taket , Shunting Jamadar, Linesman and Supervisory personnel to look after various activities connectedwith the movement of Railway Wagons from Railway Station to the port area and back. In so far as the maintenance ofthe Railway Tracks is concerned it is alleged by the Union that since 1983 the workman in question (70 number) are working as maintenance Mazdoor under different successive sham contractors to keep the railway tracks clean for smooth movement of wagons . Besides maintaining the same they are also utilized in other maintenance work under the direct supervision of the Engineers and Supervisors of the Port establishment . It is further alleged that earlier the Management had engaged in a similar way different workers through such contractors forhandling ofcargoes and in intra -transportation activities withinthe port area as also on works concerned with the process of landing and shipment of cargoes in the port area. But subsequently these workers were alone regularized through a scheme called Paradip Port Cargo Handling Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme, 1979 even though the contract labour engaged in Railway- track -maintenance had equal justification for their regularization. It is claimed that the work performed by And 9463 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
FINDINGS
ISSUE NOS . 1 & 2
these workers in track maintenance being of continuous and perennial in nature and as such work is permanently needed till such time the port exists, they are needed to be regularized, their engagement being continuous under different sham contractors .
6. These issues call for an answer whether the disputants in question are workman within the definition of Section 2 (S) of the Act and whether there was any employee -employer relationship between them and the Management of Paradeep Port Trust Limited.
3. While refuting the above claim of the Union it is averred by the Management that in 1992 the maintenance and repair of Railway tracks was taken over by the Management from S.E. Railway authority and since then the above work is being done through contractors from time to time, the nature and requirement of such works not being perennial in nature . Further the Railway maintenance work not being a part of Intra port -transportation as per Clause -2( a) of the Cargo Handling Workers (Regulation of Employment ) Scheme 1979, the workers engaged in Railway maintenance are not entitled to be regularized under the said scheme , the work they perform not being a continuous butperiodical in nature . It is further alleged that since the railway maintenance work is being entrusted to contractors from time to time it has no knowledge if the 70 disputant- workers had ever been engaged continuously by different contractors over the years or not. It is further contended that since the Management is possessed of necessary Labour License to engage contractors , the contractors so engaged cannot be termed as sham . Further since these workers are directly paid by the contractor , there exists no employee and employer relationship between them and Management and as such the Union is not justified to claim their regularization.
4. On the basis of the above pleadings of the parties thefollowing issues were framed.
ISSUES
1. Whether the 70 Nos . of Railway Maintenance Mazdoors are workmen within the meaning of Section 2( s) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 ?
2.Whether there is employer-employee relationship between the Management of Paradeep Port Trust and the 70 Nos . of Railway Maintenance Mazdoors?
3. Whether the 70 Nos . of Railway Maintenance Mazdoors are engaged in permanent and perennial nature ofwork since 1990 ?
4. Whether the demand of Paradeep Port and Dock Mazdoor Union for regularization of 70 Railway Maintenance Mazdoors ( as per list) who are engaged in permanent and perennial nature of work since 1990 by the Management ofParadeep Port Trust isjustified?
5. To what relief, if any, the workmen are entitled ?
7. Deposing in the case the General Secretary of the 2nd Party-Union (W.W. -4) has given a detailed account of different types of works normally performed by these disputants . According to him these disputants have been engaged by the Management since 1992 and their works and performance are accordingly being supervised by the Engineers of the Management . The Management is also acting as the disciplinary authority of these workers and that every now and then they are reprimanded by the supervising officers . It is his further evidence that the disputants havebeen engaged by the Management without any letter of appointment, interposing some contractors as their employers and the contractor so interposed hardly supervised or instruct the disputant to attend any particular job. To justify that these disputants have been engaged by the Management, several daily gate passes (Ext . -4 series to Ext. -7 series) issued under the seal and signature of Executive Engineer , Railway Division of the Management have been produced. But these documents show that for working inside the prohibited port area these daily passes have been issued to some of the disputants . The letter (Ext. -8 , dated 5-9-2002) of the Executive Engineer, Port Railway Division addressed to the Asstt . Commandant , CISF Unit, Paradeep Port Trust discloses that on the basis of said letter some of the disputants and few others numbering 28 were allowed to work inside the prohibited area during the relevant time for a fixed period as theywere belonging to a contractor . Therefore , these documents can not be the basis to say that the disputants were of the Management but not of the Contractor. Contrary to the above when three of the disputants ( W.W. - 1, 2 and 3) claim to have been working under different contractors and as according to them they are also being paid by such contractors in presence of a representative of the Management, it all shows that the person under whom they are working is not a sham contractor . To this extent the claim of the Union as advanced through its General Secretary ( W.W. -4) visibly appears like a snow -ball and not worthy of consideration . Therefore, it is held that there is no employee - employer relationship between the disputants and the Management to claim regularization . However the Management being their Principal employer they are declared workman within the meaning of Section 2(S) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
ISSUE NOS . 3 to 5
و 8. These issues are taken up together as they are inter - related.
5. From the side of the Union four witnesses have been examined while the Management has examined two of his witnesses . A large numbers of gate passes issued to the workers and marked as Ext -4 to 4/34, 5 to 5/34, 6to 6/34 , 7 to 7/32 and many other official documents marked as Ext-1 to 3 and 8 to 15 have been filed by the Union. On the other hand the Management has filed two documents such as an Agreement with a Contractor (Ext- A) and a copy of the Cargo Handling Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scherne 1979 marked as Ext-B
Now with the above findings given under Issue Nos . 1 and 2 that the disputants are contract labourers , it is to be seen whether , considering their tong standing engagement under different contractors they need to be regularized in the establishment of the Management .
4506G1/07-10 9464
[PART II SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007 KARTIKA 26, 1929
9. It is a well- known fact that no court or Tribunal can direct for regularization of contract labour unless it is shown that, they were engaged in continuous and perennial nature of jobs in violation of the prohibitory order passed under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act or where such engagement has been made without obtaining necessary license as required under the
said Act.NEN DARI
10. While over-rolling the judgement in Air India's case reported in AIR 1997 SC 645 , a fivejudge Bench ofthe Hon'ble Supreme Court have held at sub-para 5, and 6 of Para 122 of the case between Steel Authority of India Limited and others reported inAIR-2001 - SC-3527 as follows:
contractors having Labour permits have alone been given such contract of maintenance . One of the Contractor's agreement deed (Ext. -A) produced as a specimen evidence shows that the same has been given to a genuine contractor having Labour Permit . Besides in their evidence three of the workman (W. W.1 , 2 and 3 ) have consistently admitted themselves to be the workers of contractor. They have also named some of the contractor under whom they have worked at different point of time and that there is no material toshow ifany order under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the C.L.R. Act prohibiting engagement of contract labour was ever passed bythe Government during such time or in a later stage . The unchallenged pleading of the Management shows on the other hand thatthat contractors having labour license are only being given such contract of maintenance. Therefore in such circumstances when three of the disputants (W.W. 1,2and3) have categorically admitted, as held under Issue No.1 and 2, that they are contract labour , the question of considering the case within the parameter of the above Rulings of the Hon'ble Supreme CounCourt does not arise and as such the Union seems to have no ground to claim the regularizations of the disputant workers .
(5) On issuance of prohibition notification under Section 10( 1 ) of the CLRA Act prohibiting employment ofcontract labour or otherwise, in an industrial dispute brought before it by any contract labour in regard to conditions of service , the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground ofhaving undertakentoproduce any given result for the establishment or for supply ofcontract labour for work ofthe establishment under a genuine contract or is a mere ruse/ camouflage to evade compliance of various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefit there under. If the contract is found to be genuine but a mere camouflage , the so-called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the concerned establishment subject to conditions as may be specifiedby it for that purpose in the light of Para-6 hereunder.
(6) If the contract is found to be genuine and prohibition notification under S.10( 1 ) of the CLRA Act in respect of the concerned establishment has been issued by the appropriate Government , prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process operation or other work of any establishment and where in such process , operation or other work ofthe establishment the principal employer intends to employ regular workmen he shall give preference to the erstwhile contract labour, if otherwise found suitable and, if necessary, by relaxing the condition as to maximum age appropriately taking into consideration the age of the workers at the time of their initial employment by the contractor and also relaxing the condition as to academic qualifications other than technical qualifications .
12. It has further been claimed by the Union that the work performed by the disputants being of continuous and perennial in nature , they deserves to be regularized in the manner as the cargo handling workers have been regularized by the Management through a scheme called Paradeep Port Cargo handling workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme 1979. In this regard it is claimed by theUnion in its claim statement that since the disputants are performing work of intra transportation like the cargo handling workers and as in other major ports the Railway maintenance work is carried out through regular workers designating them as gangman , Ash Pit Cieaners , Malies etc. , the disputants in question should be regularized accordingly with similar designation so as to have a uniform system in all the major ports including the one in question . Through the W. W. 1 , 2 and 3 it is stated that these disputants are engaged not only to keep the Railway Tracks cleaned so as to allow easy movement of the Railway wagons but they are also engaged in doing the work of joining fish plates, putting the slippers in the Railway tracks inright direction, changing of rail lines , points and locking ofthe tracksetc. But from the evidence of these witness it is clear that the above works are not required to be attended daily in a routine manner . Rather their evidence shows that as and when necessary they are doing the above work. This shows that the disputants have only been engaged to attend to various sundry jobs as and when necessary as apart of maintenance work. Therefore , as claimed by the Management Witness , none of the above works as performed by the disputants can be treated individually as continuous and. perennial in nature . So also the work performed by these disputants can not be equated with that of the job of a cargo handling workers engaged in loading and unloading ofcargoes in port area and nor they can be regularized under any scheme in absence of employee employer relationship between them and the Management as held in a case between Steel Authority of India Limited eto. Versus National Union Water Front . Workers and others reported in AIR 2001 -SC - 3527 .
11. In the instance case there is no evidence of any prohibitory order being issued by the Government under Section 10( 1 ) ofthe Contract Labour Prohibition Act (CLR Act) restricting the use of contract labour . Whiie dealing with Issue Nos . 1 and 2 it has already been held that the disputants are the employees of the contractor engaged genuinely . The evidence of the Management witness and the unchallenged averment of the Management shows that [भाग II खण्ड 3( ii) ]
9465 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
13. Accordingly the reference is answered in negation.
and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007.
[No:Ld1012/6/2007- IR (M)]
bariq ve o podinoma :
Dictated & Corrected by me.net sat oude
wodnd N.'S . BORA, DeskOfficer N. K. R. MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
aden fontopro ANNEXURE grintado contro LISTOF WITNESSES- EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE 2nd PARTY-UNION
Workman Witness No. 1- Shri Bijaya KumarChampati
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNALT
Workman Witness No.2 - Shri Radhashyam Sahoo
Wednesday, the 10th October, 2007.3m Workman Witness No.3 - Shri Sunakar Moharana:
PRESENT: KAJAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer S Workman Witness No.4 - Shri Allanath Ranhandol .
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 34/2007
LIST OF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 2nd PARTY-UNION
( In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of1947) , between the Management of Airport Authority of India and their Workman...
Ext . - 1 Letter No. PPDMU/PLC( C) /61 /96 dated 4-3-1996 of Paradeep Port and Dock Mazdoor Union , Paradeep to R.L.C. (C), Bhubaneswar.
BETWEEN
Sri P. Ammichi @Kumar
S/o Palanisamy
Kamalapuram Mel Veedhi
Ext. -2- Letter No. PPDMU/IND (ND) Ply/97/5dated 12-3-1997 of Paradeep Port & Dock Mazdoor Union to Government of India , Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi.
KamalapuramPO
1.Party/Petitioner
Omalur Taluk, Salem.
Ext.-3 -Copy of letter ofE.E. Rly. Division PDP to the H.G. to issue gate passes in favour of the workman.
Vs.
TheAirportOfficer
LIST OF WITNESSES ON BEHALF OF THE 1st PARTY MANAGEMENT
Airport Authority of India Ltd.
SalemAirport,
M.W. No.1 - Shri Arta Trana Mohanty.
M. W. No.2 - Shri Himanshu Sekhar Rout .
Kamalapuram Post Omalur Taluk, Salem Distt . II Party/Respondent
Appearance:
LISTOF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OFTHE 1st PARTY -MANAGEMENT
Forthe Petitioner
...Sri P.K. Parameswaran Advocate.
Ext. -A- Copy ofAgreement dated 11-6-1997 between the Management and the Contractor.
...None
For the Management
AWARD
Ext. -B- Copy of Paradeep Port Cargo Handling Workers Regulation of Employment Scheme, 1979.
नई दिल्ली , 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
TheCentralGovernment, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/ 6/2007 - IR ( M ) dated 02/04-07-2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the action of the management of Airport
Authority of India in not regularizing the services of Sri P. Ammichi is legal and justified. If not, to what relief is the workman entitled to?"
का.आ. 3324.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट अथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया लि. , सालेम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या आई..डी सं. 34/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/6/2007- आई आर( एम) ] ...... एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd October, 2007
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 34/2007 and issued notices to both sides . After that the petitioner entered through his Advocate and filed claim statement and on the other hand, the Respondent has not appeared either personally or through their representative even after two notices
3. The allegations in the claim statement/memo of objection are briefly as follows :
S.O. 3324. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. No. 34/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Airport Authority of India Ltd. , Salem
TheThe petitioner was appointed as watch and ward by one, New Everest Security Services in the year 1994 and the work was allotted by the Respondent/Management .
9466
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKΑ 26 , 1929
The petitioner signed in the attendance register maintained by the Respondent and also getting the salary from the Respondent/Management . The petitioner and 9 others thus employed by the contractor were under the impression that the contractor would renew the contract every year but to their surprise the contract of the contractor was expited in the year 1998 and it was not renewed . The petitioner and others after their termination have filed Writ Petitions before the Hon'ble High Court which were numbered asWP No. 2719 , 3407 of 1998 and in that Hon'ble High Courtdirected the Respondent that they should be provide the work to the petitioner and other 9 persons and also further directed that they should be regularized in the services . After that the Respondent/Management has called the petitioner and other workers and report for duty on contract basis by its Order No. AAI/NAD/ SM/EB.15/333 dated 21 /22-9-1998 . The work allotted to the petitioner and others is not only watch and ward but also the preliminary . nature of work and the work is perennial in nature which is very essential and without which the airport operation of landing and taking of flights cannot be possible . While so , on 18-03-2005 , the petitioner was not admitted to enter into the Airport and not even permitted to meet the Airport Officer. The petitioner was not given any notice by oral or written before such termination of his services and the Respondent has also employed certain other workers for doing the same work in the Airport . This action of the Respondent is illegal, no nest in law . They have also issued a letter to the petitioner to vacate the quarters immediately. The petitioner learned that the Respondent/Management had preferred an appeal against the orders of the Writ Petition and it had obtained an order in their favour by concealing the real facts. Nowthe action ofthe Respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. Therefore, the petitioner prays this Tribunal to reinstate him in servicewith back wages from the date of termination viz. 18-03-2005 and to regularise the services of the petitioner intheRespondent/Management and also for consequential benefits.
4.As already pointed out, the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal even after 2 notices , therefore, the Respondent was set ex -parte and an award is to be passed by this Tribunal with the memo of objection filed by the petitioner .
Points for determination are:
(i) Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularizing the service of Sri P. Ammichi is legal and justified?
(ii) To what relief is the workman entitledto?
Point No. 1
5. The petitioner alleged that he was appointed as watch and ward by New Security Services , a contractor under the Respondent/Management during the year ' 1994 and he further alleged that he and 9 others were appointed as such in the first Respondent/Management . Though he entered through the Contractor, it is only the Respondent who has paid the salary and the Respondent Officers have only given instructions to do the work . During the year
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1998, when the petitioner came to know that the contract was not extending to the New Everest Security Services , fearing of termination he and other 9 workers have filed a WritPetitionsbefore the Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 2719, 3407 of 1998 for regularizing their services in the Respondent/Management. In that WPs, the Hon'ble High Courthas directed the Respondent/Management to absorb the petitioner and 9 others in the employment of the Respondent/Management and in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court , the Respondent/Management called the petitioner and other workers to report for duty vide its Order No. Airport Authority of India/NAD/ SM/ EB.15/333 dated 21 /22-9-1998 . It is his further contention that he and other workers joined the duty and they have worked as per the instructions of the Officers of the Respondent/Management but they have not been confirmedby the Respondent/Management. It is his further contention that he was appointed as watch and ward and the work done by the petitioner and others are perennial in nature and they are very essential and without which the Airport Operation of landing and taking of flights would not be possible . It is his further contention that while so on. 18-03-2005 , the Respondent/Management without any notice or notice of compensation has not permitted the petitioner and others to enter into the premises , thus the Respondent/Management has terminated the services of the petitioner and others . The action of the Respondent/ Management in terminating the services of the petitioner and others is illegal and void abinitio. The Respondent/ Management has not followed the mandatory petitioner of the Section 25 (F) of the Industrial Disputes Act . Hence they have raised a dispute before the labour authorities and on its failure ofconciliation, the matter was referred to this Tribunal .
6. The learned cotunsel of the petitioner contended that the action of the Respondent/Management for terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. Even before this Tribunal, the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal to deny the allegations of the petitioner and as such an award is to be passed against the Respondent/Management . I find much force in the contentions ofthe learned counsel of the petitioner . Further , the petitioner has filed a copy ofthe order dated 21 /22-9-1998 issued by the Respondent /Management asking the petitioner to report for duty . He has also filed the copy of the order ofthe Writ Petition Nos 2719 and 3407 to3413 of 1998 dated 19-06-1998 wherein the petitioner and others have filed a Writ Petition against the Respondent/ Management . Since the Respondent has not appeared before this Court and not filed any objection against the allegation of the petitioner and remained ex- parte, I find the contention of the petitioner is to be believed . As such I find this point in favour of the petitioner.
Point No. 2
The next pointto be determined is as to what relief the workman is entitled?
7. In view of my foregoing findings , 1 find the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement in service . Further theRespondent is directed to regularize the petitioner in [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9467
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
the service ofthe Respondent/Management . The petitioner is also entitled to consequential benefits .
8 Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the PA, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 10th October, 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses.Examined :
None Forthe I Party/Petitioner
None For the II Party/Management
Documents Marked:
From the Petitioner's side
Ex. No. Date Description
Nil
From the Management side :
EX.No. Date Description
Nil
नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3325. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट अथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया लि. , सालेम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या आई. डी सं. 30/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती हैं , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/4/2007- आई आर( एम) ] एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd October, 2007
S.O. 3325. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. No. 30/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India Ltd. , Salem and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007 .
[No. L- 11012/4/2007- IR (M) ] N. S. BORA , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, CHENNAL
Wednesday, the 28th August, 2007 PRESENT: K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 30/2007 (In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Airport Authority of India and their Workınan)
BETWEEN
Sri M. Perumalswamy,
S/o Sri Mariappan ,
Kamalapuram Kizh Colony,
Dharmapuri Main Road,
Kamalapuram PO Omalur Taluk
Salem Distt.
: I Party/ Petitioner Vs.
TheAirportOfficer ,
Airport Authority of India Ltd. ,
SalemAirport, Kamalapuram Post,
Omalur Taluk,
Salem Distt .
: II Party/Respondent APPEARANCE :
Forthe Petitioner
SriP.K. Parameswaran Advocate
None
For the Management
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/4/2007 -IR(M) dated 18-06-2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularizing the services of Sri M. Perumalswamy is legal and justified . If not , whatrelief is the workman entitled for ?"
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 30/2007 and issued notices to both sides . After that the petitioner entered through his Advocate and filed claim statement and on the other hand , the Respondent has not appeared either personally or through their representative even after two notices .
3. The allegations in the claim statement/ memo of objection is briefly as follows:
The petitioner was appointed as watch and ward by one, New Everest Security Services in the year 1994 and the work was allotted by the Respondent/Management. The petitioner signed in the attendance register maintained by the Respondent and also getting the salary from the Respondent/Management .
The petitioner and 9 others thus employed by the contractor were under the impression that the contractor would renew the contract every year but to their surprise the contract of the contractor was expired , in the year 1998 and it was . not renewed . The petitioner and others .after their termination has filed Writ , Petitions before the Hon'ple High Court which were numbered as WP No. 2719 , 3407 of 1998 and in that Hon'ble High Court directed the Respondent that they should be provide the work to the petitioner and other 9 persons and also further directed 9468
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
PART I-SEC. 3 (i)]
passed by the Hon'ble High Court, the Respondent/ Management called the petitioner and other workers to report for duty vide its Order No. Airport Authority of India/NAD/SM/EB.15/32 dated 21 /22-9-1998. It is his further contention that he and other workers joined the duty and theyhave workedas per the instructions ofthe Officers of the Respondent/Management but they have not been confirmed by the Respondent/Management. It is his contention that the was appointed as watch and ward and the work done by the petitioner and others are perennial in nature and they are very essential and without which the Airport Operation of landing and taking of flights would not be possible. It is his further contention that while so on 18-03-2005 , the Respondent/Management without any notice or notice of compensation has not permitted the petitioner and others to enter into the premises , thus the Respondent/Management has terminated the services of the petitioner and others . The action of the Respondent/ Management in terminating the services of the petitioner and others is illegal and yoid ab initio . The Respondent/ Management has not followed the mandatory provisions of the Section 25 (F) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Hence they have raised a dispute before the labour authorities and on its failure of conciliation , the matter was referredto thisTribunal .
that they should be regularized in the services. After that the Respondent/Management has called the petitioner and other workers and report for duty on contract basis by its Order no. AAI/NAD/SM/EB.15/329 dated 21 /22-9-1998. The work allotted to the petitioner and others is not onlywatch and ward but also the preliminary nature of work and the work is perennial in nature which is very essential and without which, the airport operation of landing and taking offlights cannot be possible While so , on 18-03-2005, the petitioner was not admitted to enter into the Airport and not even permitted to meet the Airport Officer . The petitioner was not given any notice by oral or written before such termination of his services and the Respondent has also employed certain other workers for doing the same work in the Airport . This action of the Respondent is illegal, nonest in law . They have also issued a letter to the petitioner tovacate the quarters immediately . The petitioner learned that the Respondent/Management had preferred anappeal against the orders of the Writ Petition and it had obtained an order in their favour by concealing the real facts.Now the action ofthe Respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . Therefore , the petitioner prays this Tribunal to reinstate him in service with back -wages from the date of termination viz. 18-03-2005 and, to regularize the services of the petitioner in the Respondent/Management and also for consequential benefits .
4. As already pointed out, the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal even after two notices , therefore , the Respondent was set ex - parte and an award is to be passed by this Tribunal with the memo of objection filed by the petitioner .
Points for determination are:
(i ) Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularizing the service of Sri G. Arumugam is legal andjustified?
(ii ) To what relief is the workman entitled to ?
Point No. 1
6. The learned counsel of the petitioner contended that the action of the Respondent/ Management for terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . Even before this Tribunal , the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal to deny the allegations ofthe petitioner and as such an award is to be passed against the Respondent/Management. 1 find much force in the contentions ofthe learned counsel ofthe petitioner . Further, the petitioner has filed a copy of the order dated 21 /22-9-98 issued by the Respondent/Management asking the... petitioner to report for duty. He has also filed the copy of the order ofthe Writ Petition Nos . 2719 and 3407 to 3413 of 1998 dated 19-06-1998 wherein the petitioner and others have filed a Writ Petition against the Respondent/ Management . Since the Respondent has not appeared before this Court and not filed any objection against the allegation of the petitioner and remained ex-parte , I findthe contention of the petitioner is to be believed . As such I find this point in favour of the petitioner .
Point No. 2
7. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement in service . Further the Respondent is directed to regularize the petitioner in the service ofthe Respondent/Management . The petitioner also entitled to consequential benefits .
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the PA, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 28thAugust , 2007).
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer 5. The petitioner alleged that he was appointed, as watch and ward by New Security Services , a contractor under the Respondent/Management during the year 1994 and he further alleged that he and 9 others were appointed as such in the first Respondent/Management though he entered into contract with the contractor , it is only, the Respondent who has paid the salary and the Respondent Officers have given instructions to do the work. During the year 1998 , when the petitioner came to know that the contract was not extending to the New Everest Security Services , fearing of termination he and other 9 workers ' have filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court in WPNo. 2719, 3407 of 1998 for regularizing their services in the Respondent Management . In that WP, the Hon'ble High Court has directed the Respondent/Management to absorb the petitioner and 9 others in the employment of the Respondent/Management and in view of the order
1 .
[भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर, 2007
का.आ. 3326. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट अथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया लि. , सालेम , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई..डी 29/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/3/2007-आई आर( एम) ] एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 23rd October , 2007 S.O. 3326. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. 29/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India Ltd. , Salem and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007.
[No. L- 11012/3 /2007 - IR(M) ] N. S. BORA, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Wednesday the 28th August, 2007 PRESENT: K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 29/2007 (Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Airport Authority of India and their Workman)
BETWEEN
Sri Thangaraj
S/o Muthu @ Muthusamy Kamalapuram Colony Dharmapuri Main Road, Kamalapuram PO Qmalur Taluk Salem Distt.
: 11 arty/Petitioner
Vs.
TheAirport Officer
Airport Authority of India Ltd. , SalemAirport, Kamalapuram
:
9469
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
PostOmalur Taluk
SalemDistt.
II.Party/Respondent Appearance:
ForthePetitioner
: Sri P.K. Parameswaran, Advocate
None
For the Management
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry ofLabour vide its OrderNo. L- 11012/3/2007- IR (M) dated 18-6-2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication . The Schedule mentioned in that order is:
"Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularizing the services of Sri Thangaraj is legal and justified . Ifnot, what relief is the workman entitled for ?"
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute . this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 29/2007 and issued notices to both sides . After that the petitioner entered through his Advocate and filed claim statement and on the other hand, the Respondent has not appeared either personally or through their representative even after two notices .
3. The allegations in the claim statement/memo of objection isbriefly as follows:
The petitioner was appointed as watch and ward by one, New Everest Security Services in the year 1994 and the work was allotted by the Respondent/ Management . The petitioner signed in the attendance register maintained by the Respondent and also getting the salary from the Respondent/ Management. The petitioner and 9 others thus employed by the contractor were under the impression that the contractor would renew the contract every year but to their surprise the contract ofthe contractor was expired in the year 1998 and it was not renewed . The petitioner and other after their termination have filed a ' Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court which were numbered as WP No. 2719, 3407 of 1998 and in that Hon'ble High Court directed the Respondent that they should provide the work to the petitioner and other 9 persons and also further directed that they should be regularised in the services . After that the Respondent/Management has called the petitioner and other workers and report for duty on contract basis by its Order No. AAI /NAD/ SM/EB.15/ 329 dated 21/22-9-1998. The work allotted to the petitioner and others isnot onlywatch and ward but also the preliminary nature ofwork and the work is perennial in nature which is very essential and without which , the Airport Operation of landing and taking of flights cannot be possible. While so , on 18-03-2005, the petitioner was not admitted to enter into the Airport and not even permitted to meet the Airport 9470
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Officer. The petitioner was not given any notice by oral or written before such termination of his services and the Respondent has also employed certain other workers for doing the same work in the Airport . This action of the Respondentis illegal, nonest in law. They have also issued a letter to the petitioner to vacate the quarters immediately. The petitioner learnt that the Respondent/ Management had preferred an appeal against the orders oftheWrit Petition and it had obtained an order in their favour by concealing the real facts . Now the action of the Respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the mandatory provisions ofthe Industrial Disputes Act. Therefore , the petitioner prays this Tribunal to reinstate him in service with back- wages from the date of termination viz . 18-3-2005 and to regularize the services of the petitioner in the Respondent/ Management and also for consequential benefits .
Authority ofIndia/NAD/SM/EB- 15 /32 dated 21 /22-9-1998. It ishis further contention that he and other workers joined the duty and they have worked as per the instructions of the Officers of the Respondent Management but they have not been confirmed by the Respondent/ Management . It is his further contention that he was appointed as watch and ward and the work done by the petitioner and others are perennial in nature and they are very essential and without which the Airport Operation of landing and taking of flights would not be possible . It is his further contention that while so on 18-03-2005 , the Respondent/Management without any notice or notice of compensation has not permitted the petitioner and others to enter into the premises , thus the Respondent/Management has terminated the services of the petitioner and others . The action of the Respondent/ Management in terminating the services ofthe petitioner and others is illegal and void ab initio . The Respondent/ Management has not followed the mandatory provisions of the Section 25 (F) of the Industrial Disputes Act . Hence they have raised a dispute before the labour authorities and on its failure of conciliation, the matter was referred to this Tribunal .
:
4. As already pointed out, the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal even after 2 notices, therefore, the Respondent was set ex- parte and an award is tobe passed by this Tribunal with the memo of objection filed by the petitioner.
Points for determination are :
(i) Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularising the service of Sri G. Arumugam is legal and justified?
(ii) To what relief is the workman entitled to?
Polnt No. 1
6. The learned counsel of the petitioner contended that the action of the Respondent/Management for terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . Even before this Tribunal , the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal to deny the allegations of the petitioner and as such an award is to be passed against the Respondent/Management . I find much force in the contentions of the learned counsel of the petitioner . Further, the petitioner has filed a copy ofthe order dated 21/22-9-98 issued by the Respondent/Management asking the petitioner to report for duty. He has also filed the opy of the order ofthe Writ Petition Nos . 2719 and 3407 to 3413 of 1998 dated 19-6-1998 wherein the petitioner and others have filed a Writ Petition against the Respondent/Management . Since the Respondent has not appeared before this Court and not filed any objection against the allegation of the petitioner and remained ex- parte, I find the contention of the petitioner is to be believed. As such I find this point in favour of the petitioner.
Point No. 2
7. In view of my foregoing findings, I find the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement in service. Further the Respondent is directed to regularize the petitioner in the service ofthe Respondent/Management . The petitioner is also entitled to consequential benefits .
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer 5. The petitioner alleged that he was appointed as watch and ward by New Security Services , a contractor under the Respondent/Management during the year 1994 and he further alleged that he and 9 others were appointed as such in the first Respondent/Management . Though he entered into contract with the contractor , it is only the Respondent who has paid the salary and the Respondent Officers have only given instructions to do the work. During the year 1998 , when the petitioner came to know that the contract was not extending to the New Everest Security Services fearing of termination he and other 9 workers have filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court in W.P. Nos . 2719, 3407 of 1998 for regularizing their services in the Respondent/ Management . In that WPs , the Hon'ble High Court has directed the Respondent/ Management to absorb the petitioner and 9 others in the employment ofthe Respondent/Management and in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court, the Respondent/Management called the petitioner and other workers to report for duty vide its Order No. Airport 9471 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
APPEARANCE:
नई दिल्ली , 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
For the Petitioner
: Sri P.K. Parameswaran Advocate
: None
For the Management
AWARD
का. आ. 3327.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट अथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया लि. , सालेम , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी. सं. 28/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The Central Government, Ministry of. Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/2 /2007 - IR( M) dated 18-06-2007 : referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunai for adjudication .
[सं. एल -11012/2/2007- आई आर ( एम ) ] एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
New Delhi , the 23rd October, 2007
"Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularizing the services of SriG. Arumugam is legal and justified . Ifnot, what relief is the workman entitled for ? "
S.O. 3327.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I. D. No. 28/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India Ltd. Salem and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007 .
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 28/2007 and issued notices to both sides . After that the petitioner entered through his Advocate and filed claim statement and on the other hand, the Respondent has not appeared either personaily or through their representative even after two notices .
[File No. L- 11012/2/2007 - IR (M)]
N. S. BORA, DeskOfficer
3. The allegations in the claim statement/memo of objection are briefly as follows:
ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 28th August, 2007
PRESENT
K. JAYARAMAN,
PresidingOfficer
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 28/2007
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2( A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of1947), between the Management of Airport Authority of India and their Workman)
BETWEEN
: I Party/Petitioner
Sri G. Arumugam S/o Sri Govindan ,
Thumbipadi Colony Thumbipadi PO, Omalur Taluk Salem.
Vs.
TheAirport Officer
Airport Authority of India Ltd. Salem Airport, Kamalapuram PostOmalur Taluk Salem Distt.
: II Party/Respondent
The petitioner was appointed as watch and ward by one, New Everest Security Services in the year 1994 and the work was allotted by the Respondent/Management. The petitioner signed in the attendance register maintained by the Respondent and also getting the salary from the , Respondent/Management . The petitioner and 9 others thus employed by the contractor were under the impression that the contractor would renew the contract every year but to their surprise the contract of the contractor was expired in the year 1998 and it was not renewed . The petitioner and others after their termination have filed Writ Petitions before the Hon'ble High Court which were numbered as WP No. 2719 , 3407 of 1998 and in that Hon'ble High Court directed the Respondent that they should be provide the work to the petitioner and other 9 persons and also further directed that they should be reqularized in the services . After that the Respondent/Management has called the petitioner and other workers and report for duty on contract. basis by its Order No. AAI/NAD/ SM/EB.15/329 dated 21 /22-9-1998 . The work allotted to the petitioner and others is not only watch and ward but also the preliminary nature of work and the work is perennial in nature which is very essential and without which the airport operation of landing and taking of flights cannot be possible . While so , on 18-03-2005 , the petitioner was not admitted to enter into the Airport and not even permitted to meet the Airport Officer. The petitioner was not given any notice by oral or written before such termination of his services and the Respondent has also employed certain other workers for 4506G1/07--11 9472
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
doing the same work in the Airport. This action of the Respondent is illegal , no nest in law. Theyhave also issued a letter to the petitioner to vacate the quarters immediately. The petitioner learned that the Respondent/Management had preferred an appeal against the orders of the writ petition and it had obtained an order in their favour by concealing the real facts . Now the action of the Respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. Therefore, the petitioner prays this Tribunal to reinstate him in service with back- wages from the date of termination viz.18-03-2005 and to reqularise the services ofthe petitioner in the Respondent/Management and also for consequential benefits.
4. As already pointed out, the Respondent has not appeared before this Tribunal even after 2 notices , therefore, the Respondent was set ex-parte and an award is tobe passed by this Tribunal with the memo of objection filed by the petitioner .
Points for determination are:
(i ) Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India in not regularizing the service of Sri G. Arumugam is legal and justified?
( ii) To what relief is the workman entitled to ?
Point No. 1
5. The petitioner alleged that he was appointed as watch and ward by New Security Services , a contractor urider the Respondent/Management during the year 1994 and he further alleged that he and 9 others were appointed as such in the first Respondent/Management . Though hẹ entered through the contractor, it is only the Respondent who has paid the salary and the Respondent Officers have only given instructions todo the work . During the year 1998, when the petitioner came to know that the contract was not extending to the New Everest Security Services , fearing of termination he and other 9 workers have filed a WritPetitions before the Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 2719, 3407 of 1998 for regularizing their services in the Respondent/Management . In that WPs , the Hon'ble High Court has directed the Respondent/Management to absorb the petitioner and 9 others in the employment of the Respondent/Management and in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court , the Respondent/Management called the petitioner and other workers to report for duty vide its Order No. Airport Authority of India/NAD/ SM/ EB.15/ 329 dated 21/ 22-9-1998 . It is his further contention that he and other workers joined the duty and they have worked as per the instructions of the Officers of the Respondent/Management but they have , not been confirmed by the Respondent/Management. It is his further
[PART II-SBC . 3 (11) ] contention that he was appointed as watch and ward and thework dons by the petitioner and others are perennial in nature and they are very essential and without which the Airport Operation of landing and taking of flights would not be possible. It is his further contention that while so on 18-03-2005 , the Respondent/ Management without any notice or notice of compensation has not permitted the petitioner and others to enter into the premises, thus the Respondent/Management has terminated the services of the petitioner and others . The action of the Respondent/ Management in terminating the services of ths petitioner and others is illegal and void abinitio . The Respondent/ Management has not foliowed the mandatory; provisions ofthe Section 25 (F) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Hence they have raised a dispute before the labour authorities and on its failure of conciliation, the matter was referred to thisTribunal .
6. The learned counsel of the petitioner contended that the action of the Respondent /Management for terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . Even before this Tribunal , the Respondent has not appeared : before this Tribunal to deny the allegations of the petitioner and as such an award is to be passed against the Respondent/Management . I find much force in the contentions of the learned counsel of the petitioner . Further , the petitioner has filed a copy ofthe order dated 21 /22-9-98 issued by the Respondent/ Management asking the petitioner to report for duty . He has also filed the copy of the order of the Writ Petition Nos . 2719 and 3407 to 3413 of 1998 dated 19-06-1998 wherein the petitioner and others have filed a Writ Petition against the Respondent/ Management . Since the Respondent has not appeared before this Court and not filed any objection against the allegation ofthe petitioner and remained ex-parte , 1 find the contention of the petitioner is to be believed. As such I find this point in favour of the petitioner .
Point No.2
The next pointto be determined is as to what relief the workman is entitled?
7. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement in service. Further the Respondent is directed to regularize the petitioner in the service of the Respondent/Management . The petitioner is also entitied to consequential benefits .
8 Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the PA , transcribed and typed by him , correcled and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 28th August, 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer ['भाग -खण्ड 3 ( 11 ) ]
नई दिल्ली , 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
का,आ. 3328 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. एसटीसी मोभर्स लि. और ४ अदर्स के प्रथम्धतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्याधालय सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंधाड ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईडी 2/61/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -31011/63 /2002- आई आर ( एम ) ]
एम. एस. बोरा , गैस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 23rd October, 2007
S.O. 3328. In pursuancs of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. COIT- 2/61/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the emoloyers in relation to the managernent of M/s . S. T. C. Movers Ltd. & 8 others, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007.
[No. L-31011 /63/2002-1R (M)] N. S. BORA, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAI .
PRESENT A. A. LAD PresidingOfficer
Reference No. CGIT - 2/61 of 2002 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF:
(1 ) M/s . STC Movers Limited .
(2) M/s. National Frieght Carriers .
(3 ) M/s. Contech Transport Private Ltd.
(4) M/s . Pegasus Transport Private Ltd.
(5) M/ s . Spaedy Transport Ltd.
(6) M/s. Dolphin Marine Enterprises
(7) Mi / s . Maryn Forwarding Corporation
(8 ) M/ s . Suresh Mechanical Works
(9) M/ s . Kasturi Transport Private Ltd.
(1 ) The Director M/s . ST'C Movers Limited S'TC Buliding 275, Reay Road Mumbai-400010.
(2) The Director M/s . National Freight Carriers 333/334/335 , Vyapar Bhavan , 3rd Floor, P. D'meiio road, CarnacBunder Mumbai-400009.
9473
भारत हा राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/ कार्तिक 26 , 1929
(3) The Managing Director M/s . Contech Transport Pvt. Ltd. 124, Kashiram Jamnadas Buildings , 1st Floor, 5, P. D'mellow Road, Mumbai -400009.
(4) The Managing Director M/s. Pegasus Transport Pvt. Ltd. C-4, S. P. Mistry Building, Ground Floor Dr. ShirodkarMarg, Parol (E), Mumbal-400012 .
(5) The Director M/s. Speedy Transport Ltd. BPT 1635, Mansion Road CarnacBunder Mumbal -400009 .
(6) The Managing Director M/s . dolphin Marine Enterprises STC Building, 275 , Reay Road Mumbal-400010.
(7) The Managing Director M/s . Maryn Forwarding Corporation 130, Vyapar Bhavan , P. D'mello Road Mumbal-400009.
(8) The Managing Director M/s. Suresh Mechanical Works 124, Kashiram Jamnadas Building , 1st Floor 5, P. D'mello Road Mumbal-400009.
(9) The Managing Director M/s . Kasturi Transport Pvt . ltd . 301/302, Joshi Chambers Ahmedabad Street, Carnac Bunder :Mumbal-400009.
AND THEIR WORKMEN The President Transport & Dock Workers.Union P. D'mello Bhavan P. D'mello Road, Carnac Bunder Mumbal-400038 .
APPEARANCES
FOR THE EMPLOYERS (1,549)
Mr. B. K. Ashok Advocate
FOR THE EMPLOYER (2 ) : Mr. Chinchwadkar , Advocate
FOR THE EMPLOYERS (3,7,8) : Mr. P. K. Raveedranathan Advocate
FOR THE EMPLOYERS (4,6) : Mr. S. G. Dhutia Advocate
FOR THE EMPLOYER (9 ) : Mr. J. D. D'Siiva, Advocats
FOR THE WORKMEN : Ms. Gayatri Singh, Advocate 9474
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
Mumbai , dated 27th September , 2007
AWARD
Matrix of the facts as culled out from the reference are as under:-
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , by its Order No. L- 31011 / 6/2002 [ IR (M) ] dated 26-07-2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
Ref. CGIT - 2/ 61 of 2002
"Whether the workmen of STC Movers and 9 other Transport Operators , are justified in raising the charter of demands related to wage revision ? Ifyes , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2.Claim statement iffiled by Secretaryof second party Unon at Ex - 16 which is denied by number of various first parties and have challenged demand by filing their respective Written Statement . Issues are framed at Ex - 66 on the basis of pleadings of the parties concerned .
3.Meanwhile second party union settled its dispute with first part No. 1 i.e. with STC Movers Ltd. and submitted it atEx- 67 with copy of the Settlement . It is admitted by the secretary of the union and the First party No. 1. In this situation, I proceed to pass the following order as far as first party No. 1 is concerned.
ORDER
In view of Ex- 67 , reference of the Second party Union against first party No. 1 i.e. M/ s . S.T.C. Movers Ltd. is disposed of.
Ext.-67 Dated 27-09-2007
A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer CGIT-2, Mumbai BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2
REFERENCE (CGIT) No. 61 of2002 BETWEEN
Employers in relation to the Management of M/ s STC Movers Ltd & Ors .
AND
Their workmen
MAY IT PLEASE THIS HONBLE TRIBUNAL :-
It is submitted that the dispute in respecty of M/ s . STC Movers Ltd, First party No. 1 has been settled . A settlement dated 16-4-2007 has been signed between M/s . STC Movers Ltd and the Union on behalf of the workers . It is therefore submitted that the settlement dated 16th April , 2007 be taken on record and an award be passed in terms of settlement dated 16-4-2007 and STC accordingly be deleted from the said reference as having settled the dispute . Enclosed is a copy of the settlement dated 16-4-2007 .
Mumbai
Sd/-Illegible Secretary Dated: 27-9-2007
Transport & Dock Workers Union , Mumbai
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT U/S 2 P , 12(1), 18( 1 ) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT r/w RULE 62OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES RULES, 1967.
Parties to the settlement : Messrs . STC MOVERS
PVT.LTD. 275, Reay Road, Mumbai -400 010 .
And
The Workmen employed under it.
Representing the Employer : Mr. B.V. Sheregar Director (on behalf of the Company)
Mr.S.R. Kulkarni President .
Representing the Work- men of the Transport and DockWorkers Union , P.D.'Mello Road, Mumbai 400 038 .
: Mr.P.K. Raman , Secretary. :Mr. Bote Patil, O.S.D.
SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE
Whereas the settlement dated . 29-01-1999 stood expired and the union served a fresh Charter of Demand. During the relevant period the Company was undergoing financial crisis . The said Charter ofDemand subsequently referred for adjudication being Case No. IC CGIT/2/ 61 / 02 / and CGIT NO . 2/3/03 . The union aforesaid named anapplication for interim relief inrespect of VDA and the rejected. same was Andwhereas due to financial crisis the Management had retrenched some employees after following the due process oflaw. !
And whereas the Union and the Management had arrived at some understanding pertaining to the labour issue. The Management stopped the payment of running VDA and admitted continuing to pay minimum rate of wages.
And whereas the Union admitted and understood the financial status of the company and further agreed to co-operate for further period.
Accordingly both the parties arrived at a settlement onthe following terms :-
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
1. It is agreed that this agreement under reference shall supercede all other understandings , settlement and agreements and the present settlement shall deemed of have settled all or any claim of the workmen if any between 01-04-2001 to 31-01-2007.
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
From01-02-2007 to31-3-2010 .
Period of Settlement
Demand No. 1 Wage Structure It is agreed by and between the Work- men that the existing wage structure shall be continued .
However, in addition to the present basis salary, all the permanent employees shall be given an increment of 10 % on adhoc basiswith effect from 01-02-2007 and the same shall be continued after the expiry of the agreement period. It is a one time increment till the next settlement .
Demand No. 2,3 , Minimum Wages
4 and 5
Ithas been agreed that since VDA has been granted effective from 01-04-2007 and in spite of the said increment, if any employees is found less than the Minimum Wages applicable to the establishment in such an event such employee shall be revised to minimum rate of wages so as to comply with law. The establishment shall be classified as Transport Industry and the provisions of Transport Workers Act shall be applicable.
Demand No. 6 Variable Dearness Allowance Ithas been agreed by and between the parties that VDA shall be paid with effect from 01-04-2007 . Thepresent VDA has been frozen hence the present VDA shall not be in continuation . However, the Company shall pay VDA from 01-04-2007 and the same shall added on the existing VDA. ( Rs . 2904 + increased DA Point xRs . 2/-)
Demand No. 7. House Rent Allowance It is expressly agreed by and between the parties that all the permanent workmen shall be paid House Rent Allowance @ 20% of increased wages and same shall be paid on pro- rata basis .
Demand No. 8 . CityCompensatory Allowance Theworkmen and the union do not press for the demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn during the operative period of this settlement.
Demand No. 9. Special Allowance Theworkmen and the union do not press for the demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn during the operative period of this settlement .
9475
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Demand No. 10. Travel Allowances .
It is expressly agreed by and between the parties that the present system of paying monthly Travel Allowances will continue .
Demand No. 11. Shift Working
the present system of working will be continued.
Demand No. 12. Bonus
Ithas been agreed by and between the parties that the company shall pay Bonus @8.33% per annum for the operative period.
Demand No. 13. Liberalisation of Incentive Scheme It isexpressly agreed by and between the parties that the present system of paying incentive will be continue .
Demand No. 14. Retirement Benefits
It is expressly agreed by and between the parties that workers are Super- annuated or resigned will be settled all legal dues as per laws . However the age ofretirement shall be 60 year of age .
Demand No. 15. House Building Advance
Theworkmen and the union do not press for the demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn during the operative period of this settlement.
Demand No. 16. Other Loans
Theworkmen and the union do not press for the demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn during the operative period of this settlement .
Demand No. 17. Special Pays and Allowances The workmen and the union do not press for the demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn during the operative period of this settlement .
Demand No. 18. Leave Travel Concession
It is agreed by the parties that the existing practice of giving LTA or LTC shall continued without any change .
Demand No. 19. Work on Holidays
Theexisting system of granting 10 days holiday casual leave will continue without any change.
Demand No. 20. Leaye
It is agreed by and between the parties the present practice shall be continued . without any change.
Demand No. 21. Category of Employees Currently not Allowed Wages Paidto Regular Employees.
9476
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26 , 1929
The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the sameis deemed to have been settled and withdrawn .
Demand No. 22. Funeral Expenses
The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the same is desmed to have been settled and withdrawn.
A. Medical Allowanses
Demand No. 23.
It is agreed by and between the parties the e present practice shall be continued without any change
B. Insurance Coverage
:
It is agreed by and between the parties that all the workmen will be insured for Rs. 1 lakh for fatal accident while on duty or death arising out of accident while on duty . The Insurance shall also extend cover for disability or incapacitation arising out of accident whileon duty.
Demand No. 24. Educational Benefits/Allowances It is agreed by and between the parties that the present practice shall be continued without any change .
Demand No. 25. Time- Bound Promotion .
The union and the workman do not press for the above demand and the same la deemed to have been settled and withdrawn .
Demand No. 26. Overtims It is agreed by and between the parties that the present practice shall be continued without any change .
Demand No. 27. Training and Retraning Scheme The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn,
Demand No. 28. Differantial Employment
It is expressly agreed by and between the parties that the existing systme of payingActing Allowance for differential employment will continue..
Demand No. 29. Welfare The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn
Demand No. 30. Special Incement
The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the same is deemed to have been settied and withdrawn.
[PART 11-SEC. 3 (11 )] Demand No. 31. Canteens The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn.
DemandNo. 32. (A) Miscellaneous The union and the workmen do not press for the above demand and the same is deemed to have been settled and withdrawn. :
(B)MonsoonKit
It is expressed by and between the parties that the present system ofpaying Rs . 300/- per annual to each worker will continue.
(C) WeeklyOff It is expressly agreed by and between the parties that the existing system of staggering WeeklyOffwill continue .
Demand No. 33 Working Hours
It is agreed by and between the partiss that the existing system of working shall be continued without any change.
Demand No. 34. General
1. It is further agreed that the Unlon and all the Workmen shall not flle any cases during the currency of the settlement or thereafter and all the cases pending before Court of Law shall be withdrawn.
2. It is agreed by and between the paritiss that the Company will recover the union's Subscription payable by the permanent workers during the month of January every year and other dues as the case may be remit the same to the Union together with the list of the workman .
3. This settlement shall remain in force for a period ofthree years from 01-02-2007 to 31-03-2010 and thereafter till such timtime it is legally and valldly terminated as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and the rules framed thereunder.
4. Ifany difference arises in interpretation ofany of the clauses of this settlement, such differences will be sorted out by mutual discussion between the Union and theManagement .
5. It is agreed by and between the parties that only those permanent workers who are the members of The Transport and Dock Workers Union shali be entitled to get the benefits arising out of this settlement . Ifany permanent worker withdraws his membership from the Union, he forefeits his monetary benefits of otherwise right under this settlement with immediate effect,
6. It is agreed that the operative period of this settlement, the Union and the workmen wili not raise any additionai demands invoiving any fresh and/ or additional financial burden on the Company either directly or indirectiy.
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( 11 ) ]
7. The Union and the workmen agree that during the operative period of this settlement, they shall not resort to anydirect action like stoppage of work, go - slow, strike etc, which will have any adverse effect on the working of the Company or which is detrimental to the interests ofthe Company or which is prejudicial to the Administration of the Company. Likewise , the Management will not resort to lock- out, closure, lay- off without following due process of law and/or indulge in unfair labour practice and/or harassment and victimization of the workmen .
8. It is further agreed that what is not specially altered or changed by this settlement shall continue to remain in force till the operative perlod of this settlement , Mumbal dated this 16th day of April , 2007 ,
In the presence of workers
For and on behalf of STC MOVERS PVT . LTD. B. V. Sheregar
Director.
For and on behalf of the workmen (TheTransport and Dock Workers Unlon) MR. S. R. KULKARNI
MR. P.K. RAMAN SECRETARY
MR. BOTE PATIL O.S.D. WITNESS
1.
नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3329.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम का. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. - 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/ 13 /2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -30012/85 /2001- आई आर ( एम ) ]
एन.एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd October, 2007
S.O. 3329. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/13/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of M/s . Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. , andtheir workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007 .
[No. L-30012/85/2001 - IR (M) ] N. S. BORA , Desk Officer
9477
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/ कार्तिक 26 , 1929
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 , MUMBAI . PRESENT
A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT - 2 /13 of 2002
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD .
The General Manager
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , AtUsar, Alibag , Roha Road, Raigad-402 203 (MS) . AND
THEIR WORKMEN
Mr. Anthony Mathew
Room No. 2 , Hotel Deepa Opp. HPCL at Usar , Raigad-402 203 . Maharashtra State.
APPEARANCES:
: Mr. M. M. Verma, For theEmployer
Mr. B. D. Birajdar,
Mr. P. K. Ravendranathan,
Advocates
For the Workmen
: No appearance
Date ofpassing of Award : 29th August, 2007
AWARD
The reference is sent to this Tribunal by the Under Secretary ofCentral Government, The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour by its Order No. L- 30012/85 /2001 - IR(M) dated 23rd January , 2001 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 to decide:
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . HPCL in abruptly terminating the services of S/ Shri Anthony Mathew, B. Babu Raj and Girish Nair and switching over the employees from their services to the contractors is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to ?"
2. To support the subject matter involved in the Reference, 2nd Party filed Statement of Claim at Exhibit 8 which is replied by the 1st Party by filing Written Statement atExhibit 9. Issues are framed at Exhibit 10 and matter was fixed for recording evidence.
(3) Roznama reveals that, the 2nd Party is not attending Court since long dates . marking his absensee Regerence is disposesd off for want of prosecution. Hence , theorder:
ORDER
Reference is rejected for want of prosecution. Mumbai, 29th August, 2007 A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer 9478
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26 , 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
Mumbai , dated the 7th September , 2007 .
नई दिल्ली , 23 अक्तूबर , 2007
AWARD PART- II
Matrix of the facts as culled out from the reference are as under:-
का.आ. 3330,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मास्टर मैरिन सर्विसेज प्रा. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. - 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी 2/57/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, by its Order No. L- 39012/3 /2001 [ IR ( M ) ] dated 14-05-2001 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-
[सं. एल -39012/3/2001- आई आर ( एम ) ] एन.एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 23rd October , 2007
"Whether the action of the management of Master Marine Services Ltd. in dismissing the services ofMr. Narayan P. Kahar , an ex-survey Clerkw.e.f. 27-06-2000 is legal andjustified ? If not , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?"
S.O. 3330. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/57/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Master Marine Services Pvt . Ltd. , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 23-10-2007 .
[No. L- 39012/3 /2001 - IR (M) ] N. S. BORA , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAL
PRESENT
2. To substantiate the subject matter involved in the reference, Second party filed statement of claim at Exhibit -7 contending that , workman involved in the reference Shri Narayan P. Kahar was terminated without following due process of law. He was not permitted to report on duty w.e.f. 26th June 2000 without assigning any reason . The allegations were levelled against Kahar of misappropriation of Rs . 20,000/- . A criminal case of committing theft of Rs . 20,000/ - was lodged against him . The case proceeded before Uran Court which acquitted Kahar holding not guilty of theft charge . Still workman Kahar was not permitted to report on duty which is nothing but retrenchment done without following due process of law. Retrenchment effect on workman Kahar is illegal . So it isprayed that, the workman be reinstated with benefit of backwages.
A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer
! REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/ 57 OF 2001
Employers in relation to the Management of Master Marine Services Pvt. Ltd.
Executive Director
22/DSA Brelvi Road
Master Marine Services Pvt . Ltd. Fort
Mumbai -400 021.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
Shri Narayan P. Kahar
17/A, Abdul Aziz Chawl
3. This claim of the second party is disputed by the first party by filing written statement at Ex- 9 stating that , Kahar committed theft of cash ofRs . 20,000/- . He was prosecuted before the Wran Court, though he was acquitted. Anamount of Rs . 20,000/- was recovered from him . Since amount of Rs . 20,000/- was recovered, first party did not find it necessary to proceed against him . It is denied that, hewas terminated w.e.f. 27-06-2000 . In fact he did not report on duty from 22-6-2000 , since his arrest. As Kahar did not report on duty, after his arrest, and said amount of Rs . 20,000/- was recovered during investigations by the Police , first party did not feel proper to proceed to conduct domestic enquiry against Kahar and take any action . Besides it, it is stated that, first party lost confidence on Mr. Kahar , the employee involved in the reference and in this situation , he cannot claim reinstatement . So it is submitted that, reference be rejected.
Room No. 6, Naupada
Kurla(W)
Mumbai -400 070 .
APPEARANCES :
: Mr. G. R. Naik
Forthe Employers
Advocate
Forthe Workmen
: Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant Advocate .
4. In view of the above pleadings my learned Predecessor framed issues at Ex- 11 and while passing part- I award, this tribunal observed decision taken by first party in dismissing second party workman was not legal and proper and directed employer i.e. first party to justify its action. As a result of that , management examined four witnesses to justify its action by filing affidavit of Nandakumar Rajaram Bane at Ex- 39 , ofRavindra Jaganath Koli Ex-40 , ofNaresh Narayan Kadu Ex -42 and of one Bhau [ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
Gajanan Thakur at Ex-44 who were initially examined as witnesses by the First party. This time these witnesses unable to add any more and enlighten how much second party was responsible. These witnesses admit that , they do not know the facts of the alleged incident . Even they are unable to point out how much second party was concerned . Whereas workman examined himself at Ex -46 and has stated that, though there was name of Dipesh as co -accused, he alone was arrested . He tried to point out that , said Rs . 20,000 was recovered from the house ofDipesh and police relied on the statement of Dipesh who said that, said Rs . 20,000 was given by the second party. From this , it is clear that, Dipesh was co - accused from whose house Rs . 20,000 was recovered . It is also clear that, on the statement of Dipesh who was co - accused, second party was arrested . And moreover Uran Magistrate Court acquitted second party from case giving benefit of doubt . The evidence recorded by Magistrate of Naresh Kadu reveals that, at the instance of Ravindra Koli , Police arrested second party workman . Even it was accepted by the Police that , Kahar gave Rs . 20,000 to Ravindra Koli to keep in the house which was then stolen by him . It is matter ofrecord that, Rs. 20,000 were recovered from the house ofDipesh and not from the house of second party workman . There was no evidence to show that , second party workman Kahar found with money and he was punished by the Criminal Court . On the contrary , prosecution case ended in aquittal and benefit of doubt was given to his workman who was only prosecuted though amount involved in the case found in the house of other person. So when there was no direct evidence and when Criminal Court acquitted second party workman , how he can be held responsible and how first party relied on it ? Besides , it is matter of record that , no enquiry was conducted independently against second party . Charges were not levelled against second party by first party . No explanation was sought from second party . There was no evidence before first party to observe second party guilty of alleged theft . Just only on allegation and just he was arrested observing first party lost confidence, he was dismissed from the employment. Said decision was taken without following due process of law and without holding enquiry vis- a- vis without hearing second party workman.
5. The case laws referred by first party's advocate published in 1987 ( 54 ) FLR page 43 , Citation published in 2002 (92) FLR page 474 (Bombay High Court ) are on the different point where employer conclude , it lost confidence of its einployee . In those cases also enquiry was not conducted as happened in this case workman involved was on different post which was rather of operational efficiency which was connecting with the business of the company. In the instant case , facts are different. Actually amount found with another person but this second party was prosecuted relying on the statement made by the person from whom amount was recovered. Infact person from whom amount was recovered become co- accused and law does not permit to rely on the evidence of co-accused . Another citation published in 1997 LAB I.C. page 3297 is on the point ofpunishment . Here definitely Rs . 20,000 whichwas allegedly stolen by second party was admittedly recovered .
4506 G1/07-12
9479
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Besides it was not recovered from second party's custody. and recovered from third party who is not at all accused in criminal case . So definitely the punishment in that circumstance given to the second party is definitely disproportionate . Citation published in 2002 LAB I.C. page 2141 reveals that, if misconduct is proved then employer has right to dismiss the employee . But here admittedly there was no enquiry . And misconduct alleged against second party is not proved and when misconduct against second party is not proved, in my considered view, first party cannot terminate second party.
6. It is matter of record that , since the date of termination i.e. from 27-6-2000 , second party is out ofjob . The charge was of theft which is not proved before any forum. Only there was charge of attempt to commit theft and in case of theft there is no such a charge of attempt to commit theft and there is no offence in theft to which no punishment is provided in I.P.C.
7. As stated above , charges are not proved against second party at any level , still he is out of job from 27-6-2000 which in my view is more than sufficient presuming that, he was concerned with that alleged incident. But definitely, permanent termination is not solution on it as happened in the case of second party . So I conclude that, punishment awarded of dismissal required to set aside with direction to first party to take second party in the employment on the post of Clerk without any backwages and hence the order :
ORDER
(i) Reference is partly allowed.
(ii) Dismissal effected on second party Shri Narayan Kahar is set aside directing first party to take him in the employment on his post within two months from this order.
(iii) Prayer of second party to give backwages is rejected.
(iv) In the circumstances , there is no order as to cost.
Date:07-09-2007
A. A. LAD, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3331.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत ओवरसीज बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12012/166/2000- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]
अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the24th October , 2007
S.O. 3331. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 74/2000) 9480
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
3. The allegation in the claim statement are briefly asfollows:
ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007.
[No. L- 12012/ 166/2000- IR(B- 1 )]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAΙ
Wednesday, the 16th August, 2007
Present : K. JAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer
Industrial Disputes No. 74/2000
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Bharat Overseas Bank , Indian Overseas Bank and their workmen)
BETWEEN
: Petitioner
N. Gopinathan
Madipakkam Chennai -600091
120/1 , Vembuli Amman Koil Street Vs.
: 1st Respondent
1. The Deputy General Manager Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. ,
Habeeb Towers
No. 756 , Anna Salai Chennai -600002
2. Indian Overseas bank
: 2nd Respondent
represented by its Chairman Anna Salai Chennai-600002
APPEARANCE:
: M/s . Balan Haridas
For the Petitioner
R. Kamatchi Sundaresan
M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
For the Management :
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12012/ 166/ 2000 - IR( B - 1 ) dated 20-09-2000 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
(i); Whether the punishment of discharge imposed by Bharat Overseas Bank, Chennai on Shri N. Gopinathan is legal and justified . If not , what relief is the workman entitled ?
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 74 of2000 and issued notices to both sides . Both parties are entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their claim statement and counter statement respectively.
The Petitioner has raised the dispute questioning the punishment of discharge imposed by the Respondent Bankby its order dated 17-05-99 . The Petitioner hasjoined the services of the Bank on 01-10-80 as a sub -staff. He was promoted as Clerk -cum - Cashier during the year 1989 and hehad worked in several branches of the Respondent Bank and from Nov. 1990 he had been working in the Anna Nagar branch of the Respondent Bank as Clerk- cum - Cashier. While so , he was placed under suspension by the Respondent Bank and its order dated 25-02-1999 and a charge sheet was issued to him dated 08-03-1999 . In that it is mentioned that while , the Branch Manager enquired on 25-02-1999 as to whether he had received any excess cash from one Mr. Prakash on 23-02-1999 . He (The Petitioner/ Cashier) made a false statement that he has not received excess cash from him . Secondly while admitting later the receipt of excess amount of Rs . 88,850 , he made a further false statement that this amount had been kept in cash cabin itself when as a matter of fact, he had carried the entire cash with him after changing the denominations . Thirdly, the Petitioner misappropriated a sum of Rs . 88,850 tendered by the said Mr. Prakash. Fourthly, he retained the said amount tendered by the said Mr. Prakash without informing the Manager , Accountants or any other Officer of the bank with the dishonest intention of misappropriating the said amount. No doubt, the Petitioner wasworking as a Cashier on 23-02-1999 in the absence of the regular Cashier, Mr. Sanjay. There was excess of cash ofRs . 88,850 and in order to close the account for the day , the Petitioner removed the excess cash in Rs . 500 denomination and the remaining cash he sent to Madras Main Branch and he has kept the excess cash with a strong belief that the person who had remitted would definitely come and claim it . On 25-02-1999, when he was called by the Manager , he informed the Manager that the cash remitted without challan was kept in the cash cabin itself and the excess cash was paid after filling up the challan duly. The customer was also happy about this . The Petitioner has not committed any mistake as alleged by the Respondent Bank. At the most, the Petitioner can be blamed for being negligent in not informing the Bank about the excess cash which had occurred on 23-02-1999 . Only due to pressure of work and with an honest belief that the concemed party will approach him , the Petitioner had failed to inform about the excess cash to the Manager and he had no intention of misappropriation as alleged by the Respondent . For the charge sheet given to him , the Petitioner has given a detailed explanation denying the charges but on the day of enquiry , the Enquiry Officer told thatif the Petitioner denies the charges , the enquiry may go on for some time and it would result in earningearn the displeasure of the management so he compelled the Petitioner to admit the charges so that major penalty could be avoided and job could be saved . Since the Enquiry Officer assured that only a minor penalty will be imposed on him , the Petitioner left with no option admitted the charges . After this , the Disciplinary Authority proposed the punishment of discharge and also asked the Petitioner to give his comments but he has not given any opportunity 9481 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
to comment on the report of the enquiry of the Enquiry Officer before imposing the punishment of discharge . The Disciplinary Authority after having held a farce of personal hearing imposed the punishment of discharge from the Bank's service. The appeal to the appellate authority was also rejected summarily . Even the mercy petition an intention to save his job, the Petitioner admitted the charges under compulsion of the Enquiry Officer . Therefore, the so- called admission cannot be the basis for imposing the major punishment of discharge . Further , the comments of past record was first time mentioned in the order of punishment and the Petitioner was not given a hearing before considering past record of service . The Disciplinary Authority while imposing the punishment of discharge had taken into the consideration about the past record of the petitioner without giving an opportunity to the Petitioner . On this sole ground itself, the punishment is liable to be set aside as the same is in violation of principles of natural justice. Furthermore , even if there is an admission by an employee, there is a duty caste upon the management to lead independent evidence to establish the charges ofthis nature . The alleged charges are baseless. There was not even a complaint from the customer about the incident . On any ground, the punishment imposed for the alleged charges are grossly disproportionate and this Tribunal has every right to interfere under Section 11 (A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act with regard to quantum of punishment and hence for all these reasons, the Petitioner prays that an award may be passed to reinstate him in service with full backwages, continuity of service and other consequential benefits.
4. The 2nd Respondent was impleaded on the ground as the 2nd Respondent has taken over the Ist Respondent Bank and therefore the 2nd Respondent was impleaded as necessary party for the above dispute .
The 1st Respondent in its counter statement alleged:
transferred to Anna Nagar branch . On 20-02-1999 when the regular Cashier of Anna Nagar branch went on sick leave and the Petitioner was asked to attend the Cash Counter . While so , one of the customer of the Bank , Mr. Prakash, Partner of one M/s Jayam & Co. handed over a cash bag containing a Challan Book and also cash collections for Sunday & Monday as per usual practice. Later, the Petitioner had returned the empty cash bag alongwith the Challan Book . The said bag handed over to the Petitioner contained Rs . 1,64,500 being the cash collections of the shop on 21-02-1999 and an amount of Rs . 88,850 being the collection on 22-02-1999 . But the Accountant of the concerned customer prepared only a challan of Rs . 1,64,500 and omitted to prepare a challan for Rs . 88,850 on 24-02-1999 . When Mr. Praksh came to the branch and enquired about the excess cash at 07000 PM he was asked to come on the next day . The Petitioner who was acting as a Cashier on 23-02-1999 was asked about the excess cash. The Petitioner replied that he had not received any excess cash on that day . Subsequently, he admitted that he received the excess cash on 23-02-1999 and he further stated that he kept the cash in the cash cabin itself. But it became evident that the petitioner took out all the cash from the cash bag on 23-02-1999 and he was aware that a sum ofMr. Prakash of Jayam & Co. When he returned the cash bag to the customer, he did not bring to the notice ofthe customer or the Branch Manager that a sum of Rs . 88,850 was also in the bag which was not supported by any challan . In order to carry it to home , he had changed thecurrency denominations for his convenience , he neither credited it in the Sundry Creditors ' Account nor did he inform the Branch Manager or any other staff about the excess cash. Therefore , the Respondent Bank issued a charge sheet alleging that the misconduct was under Clause 19.5(j ) of Bipartite Settlement. The Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer has admitted 4 charges framed against him and prays for a lenient view. Based on his admission , the Enquiry Officer gave his report on 16-04-1999 holding that the charges against the Petitioner are proved. Even before the Disciplinary Authority when he was asked to appear for personal hearing , the Petitioner has pleaded only for lenience . After following the procedures , the Disciplinary Authority has imposed a punishment of discharge from service on 17-05-1999 . Therefore, the Respondent prays theorder of discharge should not be interfered with for all any of the reasons urged by the Petitioner in the Clairn Statement. Since the Petitioner was admittedly aware of excess cash ofRs . 88,850 at the closing of bank on 23-02-1999 , the Petitioner ought to have reported the excess cash to the Manager and must have brought it into the Sundry Creditors'sAccount . By not doing so, it became apparent that he wanted to appropriate the cash for himself. It is false to allege that the Petitioner was forced by the Enquiry Officer to admit the charges . It was also denied that an assurance was made that if he admits his guilt he will be awarded a minor penalty. In the enquiry , the Petitioner was given several opportunity to put forth his case before the final order or punishment . At no point of time before filing the Claim Statement, the Petitioner complained that he was compelled to admit the charges so he admitted the charges Thatthe Respondent is a banking company registered under the Companies Act . The Respondent Bank is maintaining a Book of Instructions listing out the duties and responsibilities of the staff and officers and the manner in which they should carry out their work. In that , it is clearlymentioned in Clause - 17 that any excess cash balance must be unclaimed for more than six months will be transferred to unclaimed balance of the Head Office and it is clearly stated that no staff can retain any excess cash unaccounted or with himself. The Respondent Bank and its constituents reposed absolute confidence in the trustworthiness of the employees and it expects every employee to possess a high degree of integrity in the sense that while in discharge of his duties even when an opportunity comes in the way for the employee to appropriate any money which does not belong to him, he should have honesty of returning the money to its rightful owner . While so even in the year 1998, the Petitioner was working as a Cashier in the Adambakkam Extension Counter , there was an incident which he has admitted when he has taken away the money and was imposed the punishment of stoppage of two increments for such incident . Again in November 1998, the Petitioner was 9482
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
chargeswouldjustify the order of discharge passed by the Management . After that, both sides have not let any evidence but marked documents M 21 to M 24 viz . notification of Government of India dated 12-03-2007 . As M. 21and a copy of the letter from the 1st Respondent Bank to 2nd Respondent Bankdated 22-03-2007 . As M. 22 and a copy of the letter from Ist Respondent Bank to its employees . As M. 23 and the copy of the letter to the 2nd Respondent Bank to the employees of 1st Respondent Bank. As M. 24 viz. a forwarding letter and argued the matter.
7. Now the point for determination is :
based on any assurance of minor punishment . It is not necessary that the charge -sheeted employee should be given an opportunity to make his submission on the past conduct. Since the Petitioner has admitted his guilt, it is not necessary to lead evidence on the merits ofthe charges . It cannot be said that the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is harsh and excessive having regard to the nature of charges proved against him . The charges proved against the Petitioner reflected lack of integrity on the part of the Petitioner and the Respondent could not repose confidence in him . Hence for all these reasons, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
Point No. 1
"Whether the punishment of discharge imposed by the First Respondent Bank against the Petitioner is legal and justified" .
5. The 2nd Respondent after he was impleaded in the dispute has submitted that as per terms of transfer of undertaking, the first Respondent was to furnish to the 2nd Respondent, a list of its employees on its rolls and the 2nd Respondent will make an offer of employment indicating its terms and conditions of employment and those employees in the list. In other words , the obligation ofthe 2nd Respondent to absorb in its service any employee of the 1st Respondent was he should be one of those found in the list furnished by the 1st Respondent . The Petitioner was not found in the list furnished by the 1st Respondent . The 2nd Respondent is not answerable to other.claims . Further, the 2nd Respondent has not taken over the liability forthe claims of the Petitioner against the 1st Respondent . Hence it prays to reject the claim against him .
The Points for determination are :
(i) Whether the punishment of discharge imposed by the First Respondent Bank against the Petitioner is legal andjustified.
(ii) To what relief is the workman entitled ?
6. At the first instance , in this dispute, the Petitioner was examined himself a WW1 and the Respondent also examined one Sri S. Gunasekar , a Scale III Officer in the bank and marked Ex . M1 to M16 . This Tribunal has consideredithe petitioner's preliminary objection upon viz . whether the domestic enquiry conducted by the First Respondent Bank is in accordance with principle of natural justice. The learned counsel of the petitioner contended that the domestic enquiry conducted by the First Respondent Bank against the Petitioner is against the principles and gross violation of natural justice and insisted to set aside the enquiry and he further argued that the petitioner has not given an opportunity to let his evidence in respect ofhis pleadings . As against this , the Respondent Bank preferred a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble High Court has remanded the matter to proceed further and to pass appropriate orders expeditiously. Again the Respondent bank filed a petition for clarification in which this Tribunal has passed an order stating that the evidence must be let in before this Tribunal . Again the Respondent bank has preferred an appeal before the High Court in Writ Petition 29165 of 2004 in which Hon'ble High Court remanded the matter to this Tribunal only for the purpose of providing an opportunity to the Management as well as to the 2nd Respondent only in the context of the past record of service and as to how the past records of service as well as the nature of the proved
After the matter was remanded second time by the Hon'ble High Court, the learned Counsel of the Petitioner has stated that punishment imposed for the alleged charges is excessive and grossly disproportionate to the charges framed against him and he has also argued that this is a fit case inwhich interference under Section 11 (A) is necessary with regard to quantum of punishment . The learned Counsel ofthe Petitioner further contended that the petitioner has admitted all the charges framed against him . It is only one charge viz . whether he has misappropriated the amount of Rs. 88,850 and whether he had an intention to misappropriate this amount . On the other hand, it is clear from the evidence before the domestic enquiry that this excess amount of Rs . 88,850 was with the petitioner cabin and it was not taken awayby the Petitioner. It will clinchingly prove that the petitioner has no intention to misappropriate this amount for himself. On the other hand , he kept this amount separately on the fond hope to handover the said amount to the person to whom it belonged . At the most the petitioner can be blamed for being negligent in not informing the bank about the excess cash which he had received on 23-02-1999 but for this minor misconduct such amajor punishment is definitely excessive and only due to work pressure and with an honest belief that the concerned partywill approach him claiming the amount , the petitioner has failed to inform about the excess cash to the higher officials and he had no intention to misappropriate as alleged amount . On the other hand, when M/ s . Jayam & Co.had claimed this excessive amount on 25-02-1999 , the petitioner had immediately gave the cash which he had kept in the cabin separately . Further , the fact that he had no intention to misappropriate the said amount for himself, will clearly establish from the circumstances that he has he given the cash immediately when it was asked by the Manager. Therefore at no stretch of imagination , it can be said that the petitioner has misappropriated the amount of Rs . 88,850 for himself. No doubt, the petitioner has admitted the charges framed against him at that time when the Enquiry Officer asked the petitioner . But on that ground, it cannot be said that his admission is voluntarily and therefore for simple mistake , the petitioner should not be imposed a major punishment of order of discharge which affects his life and limp . On the date of enquiry, the Enquiry 9483
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Officer told that if the Petitioner denies the charges, the enquiry may go on for some time and it would result in displeasure of management and so he compelled the Petitioner to sign in the proceedings recorded by him . Left with no option , the Petitioner had to succumb to the pressure tactics adopted by the Enquiry Officer and signed in the proceedings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and even before the Disciplinary Authority, he has made his submission that a lenient view may be taken against him and therefore he prayed this Tribunal may interfere in the quantum ofpunishment under Section 11 (A. ) of Industrial Disputes Act and impose a lesser punishment .
amount to the concerned staff having appropriated the money for his own use/gain . The Learned Counsel of the Respondent further contended that the Respondent Bank and its constituents reposed absolute confidence in the trustworthiness of the employees and it expects every employee to possess a high degree of integrity in the sense that while in the discharge of his duties even when an opportunity comes in the way for the employee to appropriate any money which does not belong to him, he should have the honesty of returning the money to its rightful owner or crediting to the bank account . In other words , even the propensity to be dishonest under any circumstances would shatter the confidence reposed in the employees . The misconduct found and proved against the Petitioner for which he was ultimately discharged should be viewed in this background and he further argued since the charges framed against the Petitioner is very serioserious in nature, the punishment of discharge was imposed on him and this in the contention of the Learned Counsel of the Respondent . In this case , the petitioner has clearly admitted the guilt ofmisappropriation and he prays only for a lenient punishment but on the other hand since the misappropriation is a very serious offence , I find the imposition ofpunishment ofdischarge as not excessive or harsh in the nature of things shown before me . Hence , I find this point against the Petitioner .
9. Again the Learned Counsel ofthe 2nd Respondent further contended that the obligation of the 2nd Respondent to absorb in its service any employee of the Ist Respondent was that he should one of those found in the list furnished by the 1st Respondent for whom an offer is made by the 2nd Respondent and has been accepted by the concerned employee and he further contended that the Petitioner is not one found in the list of names furnished by the 2nd Respondent and is not liable to meet the claim by the Petitioner in this dispute. As against this , the Petitioner contended that since the 2nd Respondent has taken over the 1st Respondent Bank, he should also liable for the liability of the 1st Respondent but in view of my findings that the punishment of charges imposed by the 1st Respondent Bank against the Petitioner is legal and justified and I am not inclined to look into the matter whether the 2ndRespondent Bank is liable for the claim by the Petitioner or not .
Point No.2
The next point to be decided in this case is:
"To what relief the petitioner is entitled"
In view of foregoing findings , the action taken by the Respondent Bank is legal and justified , I find the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief much less the reliefof reinstatement .
14. Thus the reference is disposed of accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 16h August , 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer 8. But as against this , the Learned Counsel of the Respondent contended that at no point of time before the filing of Claim Statement for this dispute , the Petitioner complained that he was compelled to admit the charges or he admitted the charges based on any assurance of minor punishment. Therefore , having admitted the charges and stood by the admission for a long time, it is not permissible for the Petitioner to urge that the admission was not voluntary or genuine . When the Petitioner (the charge sheeted employee) has admitted his guilt in the enquiry, it is not necessary to lead evidence on the merits of the charges . In this case, every opportunity was given to the Petitioner to defend his case . The charge itself is that he has misappropriated the amount belongs to M/ s . Jayam & Co. and he has not accounted for the same in the Sundry Creditors Account nor he has informed the matter of existing cash to the higher officials . The Petitioner has admitted all the charges framed against him and he has not established before this Tribunal that the admission was not made voluntarily but on the other hand by influence or by compulsion before the Enquiry Officer . Under such circumstances, it cannot be said that misappropriation has not been proved before the domestic enquiry . No doubt, the petitioner has not informed the excess cash found in his cabin on 23-02-1999, he has kept this amount for himself for nearly 2 days which the customer . Under such circumstanecs , it cannot be said that the punishment imposed against the Petitioner is harsh or excessive having regard to the nature of the charges proved in this case . The Learned counsel of the Respondent further contended that the charges framed against the Petitioner reflected lack of integrity on the part of Petitioner and the Respondent Bank could not repose confidence in him . Even before the Disciplinary Authority, the petitioner has not complained anything about the proceedings of the Enquiry Officer nor hecomplained about the alleged compulsion of the Enquiry Officer but again admitted the charges . On the other hand , he pleaded for leniency. Under such circumstances , the order of discharge should not be interfered with for all or any of the reasons alleged by the petitioner . Even in the book of instructions , Para -17 , it is clearly mentioned that any excess in cash balance must be credited to Sundry Creditors account , and every half year in September and March, the items which have been lying unaccounted for more than 6 months will be transferred to unclaimed balance ofthe Head Office . It is clearly stated that no staff of the bank can retain any excess cash, unaccounted or with himself and any violation of these instructions would 9484
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
Witnesses Examined :-
For the I Party/Petitioner : WW1 Sri N. Gopinathan
: MW1 Sri M.S. Gunasekar Forthe II Party/
Management
Documents Marked :
From the Petitioner's side
Date
Ex.No.
Description
Nil
From theManagement side :
Date
Ex.Nd
Description
Ex.M1
25-02-1999 Suspension order issued to N.Gopinath
Ex.M2
08-03-1999 Charge Sheet issued to N.Gopinath
Ex. M3
19-03-1999 Replyto charge by workman 08-03-1999
Ex.M4
Notice of enquiry Ex.MS
15-04-1999 Proceedings of enquiry !
Ex. Mo
16-04-1999 Report of enquiry Ex.M7
21-04-1999 Notice of personal hearing passed by Disciplinary Authority
Ex. M8
04-05-1999 Proceedings of personal hearing
Ex.M9
17-05-1999 Final order passed by Disciplinary Authority 22-05-1999
Ex.M10
LetterbyN. Gopinath to Appellate Authority 17-06-1999
Ex.M11
Letter ofpersonal hearing before Appellate Authority Ex.M12 25-06-1999 Proceedings of personal hearing
16-06-1999
Ex.M13
Letter from N. Gopinath to Appellate Authority Ex. M14
03-07-1999 Order ofAppellate Authority declining to interfere with final order .
30-08-1999
Ex. M15
Workman's letter to the Chairman
Ex.M16
03-09-1999 Reply to letter dated 30-08-1999
Ex. M17
11-11-1998 Charge Sheet issued to the concerned workman Ex.M18
28-11-1998 Letter by concerned workman to Disciplinary Authority
17-12-1998
Ex.M19
Punishment order passed byDisciplinary Authority
[PART II SEC. 3(ii)] नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3332, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आई सी आई सी आई बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 85/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2003 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011 /67/2002- आई आर( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th October, 2007
S.O. 3332.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 85/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of ICICI Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007.
[No. L- 12011/67/2002-IR (B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CHENNAI INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, Tuesday, Dated the 12th June , 2007 PRESENT :
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO . 85/2003 [In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause(d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of ICICI Bank Ltd. , Corporate Office , Chennai and their Worken]
BETWEEN
...Petitioner The General Secretary AllBank Appraisers ' Federation (Tamilnadu) Affiliated to CITU
(Regn . No. 2863/01 CNF). No. 1 , Kattiyakkaran Street
Cuddalore -607002
10-01-2000
Ex. M20
Letter by I Party to Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central ) Ex. M21
12-03-2007 Notification of Government ofIndia
22-03-2007
Ex.M22
Letter from Bharat Overseas Bank to Indian Overseas Bank
AND
Respondent The Management ICICI Bank Ltd.
CorporateOffice, Chennai Unit
Karumuthunilayam New No. 197( 708) Annasalai
Chennai -600 002
22-03-2007
Ex .M23
Letter from Bharat Overseas Bank to its employees .
22-03-2007
Ex.M24
Letter from Indian Overseas Bank to an employee of BharatOverseas Bank- OfferLetter.
APPEARANCE :
Forthe Petitioner
: N. Subramanian &
R.Rengaramanujam, Advocate
For the Management
: M/s . S. Ramasubramaniam &Associates .
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9485
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L- 12011 / 67/2002 IR(B- I)dated 13-05-2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The Schedule mentioned in that order is :
their service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court. The Petitioner Federation represented the Respondent/ Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers, but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services . Hence, they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure of conciliation . Therefore , the Petitioner Federation prays thisTribunal to pass an award to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank listed in the Appendix.
"Whether the demand of the All Indian Bank Appraisers Federation , Tamilnadu to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers (as per Annexure ) by ICICI Bank Ltd. , Chennai is justified ? If so, what relief the workman are entitled to ?"
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 85/2003 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations from the Claim Statement of the Petitioner are briefly as follows :
4. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement contended that this dispute is not maintainable as no employer and employee relationship existed between the Respondent and the persons mentioned in the Appendix. The Petitioner has no locus standi to raise this dispute as most of the persons mentioned in the Appendix are no longer continuing as Appraisers with the Respondent/Bank. Out of the above 25 , one Mr. S.T. Lakshmanan and Mr. P.R. Rathnam are expired. There is no such person called " C. Lakshmanan " in the Kottaiyur branch . One Mr. Subbaiah Pattar is aged about 75 years and stopped offering his services to bank due to his old age. The respondent questions- the ID raised by the Federation in the representative character , its competence, itsauthenticity and authority to raise the dispute on behalf ofthe persons is doubtful . After the Bank of Madura merged with the Respondent/Bank in the year 2001 , it used to advance loans against buildings , second hand machinery , vehicles etc. and in that process , they utilized the services ofthe Professional Valuers/Appraisers to value such items as and when required . As part of lending activities, it had been extending loans against pledge of jewels and old ornaments as well . To value the same, the Bank has been taking the help of Appraisers , on contract basis . The function of Jewel Appraisers is in no way different from the functions of the Professional Valuers/Appraisers . All these Appraisers are self- employed and they either work from their home or from their own establishments/personal office. The Jewel Appraisers do not draw any salary from the bank for the assistance rendered . On the other hand, they received commission . The help of these Gold Appraisers are not required on all the days of the month, their work is intermittent in nature , hardly 2 days a week . There is nobody in the bank who can supervise or reject their appraisal . Further, the disbursement ofjewel loan has never been a predominant activities of the bank as alleged by the Petitioner . The business scenario and organizational set up of the ICICI bank has been changed subsequent to the merger of Bank of Madura and the branches falling under "Rural Micro Banking Group" are only dealing with jewel loan. The branches involved in this dispute such as Tirunelveli , Kayalpatnam , Annamalai Nagar , Aathikulam and Ponamaravathi have been converted into " Retail Channel Liabilities Group ( RCLG ) " . Further , the branches such as Hoyapettah , Tambaram , Chennai , Anna Nagar , Hosur and Cuddalore were also converted as RCLG . Consequent of which these branches could not deal with jewel loan activities and have stopped the jewel loan
process .Hence the need of engagement of the services of The Petitioner Federation espouses the cause of 25 JewelAppraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the Appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years . Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months oftheir respective completed years of service and therefore , they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. The Respondent/Bank is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge of jewels . It is routine day- to-day business of the Respondent/Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business of the bank. The said inoney lending business on pledge ofjewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable income to the bank on secured loans . Therefore, Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are regular workmen , have become a requisite necessity and the services of jewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . They are skilled workers of the bank having their definite working hours . Further , the bank provides weighing machines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment ofquality and value ofjewels . The Respondent/ Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical workswith regard to raising ofjewel loans etc. and therefore, they are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) ofI.D.Act. The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it isa perennial one and it is indispensable for the business of the bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment. In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in I.D. No. 25/1979 directing the management to regularize 9486
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]
8. In order to substantiate their contention , on behalf ofthe Petitioner , one Murali wasjexamined as WW1 , the General Seceretary of the Petitioner Federation was examined as WW2 and one P. Kalai Selvam was examined asWW 3. On the side of the petitioner , Ex. W1 namely the copy ofengagement given to Sri Murali . Ex. W2 namely the copy of the application for jewel loan and Ex . W3 namely the copy of agreement between the Bank of Madura and Sri P. Kalai Selvam are marked . On the side of the respondent , its Chief Manager of respondent bank, one Sri S. Somasundaram was examined as MW1 and on the side ofthe respondent , Ex . Mlnamely the jewel loan lodgment . release register of Hosur .
Jewel Appraisers do not arise . The following individuals viz. Udayakumar, Subbaiah Pattar Sevarkodiyon , Ramaiah , AR. Latchumanan, C. Karunamurthy stopped on their own and were not making their services available to the bank for quite somme time . Now the bank is contractually engaging the services of Jewel Appraisers only in Karaiyur , Thidivanam, Sholavandan , Edapadi , Malappavur branches depending upon the requirement. In other words , out of24 branches involved in the present dispute only 5 branches are in the system of Jewel Loan Appraisal . The work of Gold Appraisers is not perennial in nature . They do not have any prescribed working hours /fixed time to come for work. Therefore, the Industrial Dispute Act nor the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981 are not applicable to them. It is false to allege that Jewel Appraisers are doing clerical work in the respondent bank. They are not liable to transfer. By no stretch of imagination they be termed as workmen under the definition of2 (s) of Industrial Disputes Act. The matter of Indian Bank judgment is applicable only to the particular facts and circumstances of the case . Therefore , the question of regularization of these individuals would not arise.Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.
5. Again , the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner Federation has got every competence to represent the jewel appraisers of Respondent/Bank who are members of the Federation . It is not true to say that the employment jewel appraiser is only a contract for serve and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised and controlled the work done by jewel appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the jewel appraiser has to do but also the manner in which the jewel appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent Bank's manual . There is relationship of master and servant between the Respondent and the jewel appraisers in this dispute . Hence, for all these reasons , the Petitioner Federation prays for an award in their favour .
6. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are :
(i) "Whether the demand of the Petitioner Federation to regularize the services of concerned jewel appraisers in the Respondent/ Bank is justified ?"
( ii) " To what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled?".
Point No. 1:
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is 'whether thejewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by the Petitioner Federation or whether the jewel appraisers are bnly independent contractors and self- styled professionals under contract of service ofthe Respondent/ Bank.
9.Onbehalf of the Petitioner Federation it is argued that jewel appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank duringthe regular banking hours . The apparatus , balance and other things are provided to concerned jewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard to jewel loan by the jewel appraisers . Manner of doing the work in the matter of assessing the purity, weight, value etc , has to be done as per specification , directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appraisal of jewel value etc. done by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraisers are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning of Section 2( s) of the I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and 480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months and therefore , they are entitled to be made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 . It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Respondent/Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in grantrng loans on the pledge of jewels and the Respondent/Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore , it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and place of work at the respective branches of the bank . Their work is not of seasonal and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a similar case with regard to jewel appraiser of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has passed an award in favour of the jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979, which was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court and also by the Supreme Court and , therefore , they are entitled for an award in their favour .
9487 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/ कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank. Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any relief as claimed by the Petitioner Federation . He also strongiy relied on the rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1520 GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Vs. WORKMEN , ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION, wherein the Supreme Court has held that "jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and cannot be absorbed as part time clerical staffof Indian Overseas Bank. The reason being, unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager , there were no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point oftime. The bankdid not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application . The amount was paid on commission basisby the loanee and not by the bank . Further , there was no qualification/ age prescribed, no retirement age , no transfer, no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation ." Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case . Therefore , the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute . In that case, the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between the regular employees and jewel appraisers of the bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no qualification/age . For regular employees , recruitment is to be done through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board, but in this case ofjewel appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case of regular employees , there is fixed working hours , whereas for the jewel appraisers , there is no fixed working hours . The regular employees are paid on monthly basis, but.in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case of jewel appraisers there is no disciplinary control. In the case of regular employees, the control/supervision is exercised not onlywith regard to allocation of work, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand, in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no control/ supervision over the nature of work to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paidby the bank, whereas in the case of jewel appraisers , charges are paid by borrowers . In the case of regular employees , there is retirement age, but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case of jewel appraiser , there is no transfer . The regular employees , when they are in employment , they cannot carry on any other occupation , but for thejewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held that jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and therefore, it set aside the judgment of Division Bench, which affirmed 10. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business of providing loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scaie solely based on the pledging ofjewels . But, it cannot be said that jewel appraiser work is of perennial in nature . It is contended on behalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are jewel loans to be granted, a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality , purity and value of jewels , which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to - five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work. Further , when the jewel appraisers are not available, no transaction will take place . They are free to come at any time during working hours and appraise thejewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as the job is over he could leave the establishment without any permission ofthe authorities. The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to him as the same depends on his skill, technique, and experience . Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions of Section 2(s ) of the I.D.. Act. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case . In the Indian Bank case , the jewel appraisers work are regular at least for four hours , but in this case, though the Petitioner Federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank, there is not even an iota ofevidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal . On the other hand, MW 1 has clearly stated that there were not fixed period of work and they could corne and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any manner by theManagers of the Respondent branches . Further , in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . But, in this case , though it is alleged by the Petitioner Union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager , it is not established by the Petitioner Federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . Furthermore, in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled, before any leave was granted, but it is established in this case that the concerned jewel appraisers were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application. Most irnportant thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some-what akin to the salary, but in the present case , no amount was paid by the Respondent/Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the amount paid to jewel appraisers are only commission , which
4506G1/07-13 9488
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKΑ 26, 1929
the Tribunal's judgment . Relying on the aforesaid decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this decision is applicable to the facts of this case . He argued that it is clearly established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and there is no age limit for appointment ofjewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and sucli is the case , they cannot be called as workman under the Respondent/bank and they are independent contractors and therefore , at no point of time they can claim regularization.
11. I find much force in the contention ofthe learned counsel for the Respondent .
12. But, on the other hand , on behalf of the Petitioner, it is again contended that the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions ofagriculturist and standard of people so as to suit arises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time of work , nature ofwork and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission but it is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees , borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during the banking hours for service and unto the disposal of the Manager of the bank The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service. Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross examination with regard to jewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank is the same. Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case.
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot ofdifferences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner .
14. Then again , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not anjindustrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the I.D. Act. The Petitioner federation does not have the representative capacity to represent the cause of workers employed in Respondent establishment Neither the Petitioned nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein. The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone , this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 II LLP 1 NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, U.P. & ORS 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGALLI ESTATE, Vs.
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, MADRAS 1965 I LLP 95 NELLAI COTTON MILLS VS. LABOUR COURT , MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD . Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 I LLJ 349,2004 10 SCC460 and 2006 AIR SCW 1520.
15. But , in this case , as I have already pointed out that since the concerned jewel appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point.
16. In view ofmy foregoing findings , I find thedemand ofthe Petitioner federation to regularize the services ofthe concerned jewel appraisers is not justified.
Point No. 2 :
The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ?
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief. No costs. i
18. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly. (Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 12th June , 2007) 1
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined: -
Forthe 1 Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri R. Murali
WW2 Sri K. Vijayarangan WW3 Sri P. Kalaiselvan
: MWI Sri S. Somasundaram For the II Party/Mgmt.
Documents Marked: -
Ex. No. Date
Description
W1
27-11-2000
Engagement
W2 Nil
18-11-1998
W3 Jewel Loan Document and D- 1Credit-Debit J. L. Card Appointment
For the II Party/Management : -
Date
Ex.No.
Description
MI 06-04-1994
Jewel Loan Lodgement Release Register नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3333. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार वल्लार ग्रामा बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-12011 / 28/2002- आई आर( बी- I ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 9489 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
New Delhi , the24 th October , 2007
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as 93/2003 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations from the Claim Staternent of the Petitioner are briefly as follows:
S.O. 3333. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 93/2003 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Vallalar Grama Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
[No. L- 12011 /28 /2002 - IR(B- I)]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 12th June, 2007
PRESENT : K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 93/2003
[In the matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub- section (1) and sub -section 2(A) ofSection 10 the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) between theManagement of Vallalar Grama Bank Ltd. , Head Office , Cuddalore and their workmen]
BETWEEN
:Petitioner
The General Secretary
All Bank Appraisers ' Federation (Tamilnadu) Affiliated to CITU
(Regn. No. 2863/01 CNI) No.I , Kattiyakkaran Street , Cuddalore -607002
AND
: Respondent
The Management ,
VallalarGrama Bank Ltd. HeadOffice - Thirupathiripuliyur, Cuddalore--607002
APPEARANCE
For the Petitioner
: Union Representative
:M/s. King & Partridge
For the Management
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 12011 /28/2002 - IR(B -I)) dated 20-05-2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The Schedule mentioned in that order is :-
ThePetitioner federation espouses the cause of 12 JewelAppraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the Appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years . Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months oftheir respective completed years of service and therefore , they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981. The Respondent/Bank is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge of jewels . It is routine day - to- day business of the Respondent/Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business of the bank. The said money lending business on pledge of jewels has also become a perennial. source of income earning a good and sizeable income to thebank on secured loans . Therefore , Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are a regular workmen, have become a requisite necessity and the services ofjewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment. They are skilled workers of the bank having their definite working hours . Further , the bank provides weighing machines and other instruments for appriasal and assessment of quality and value ofjewels . The Respondent/ Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical works with regard to raising ofjewel , loans etc. and therefore , they are workmen as defined under Section 2( s) of I.D. Act . The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable for the business of the bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment . In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in I D. No. 25/1979 directing the management to regularize their service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court . The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/ Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services . Hence , they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure ofconciliation . Therefore, the Petitioner federation prays this Tribunal to pass an award to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/bank listed in the Appendix.
"Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation, Tamilnadu to regularize the services ofJewel Appraisers (as per Annexure) by Vallalar Grama Bank Ltd. Cuddalore is justified ? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to ? "
4. The Respondent Bank was established on 19-06-1986 under the Regional Rural Bank Act , 1976 and it has been sponsored by the Indian Bank to cater to the 9490
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
needs of the public in Cuddalore and Villipuram districts. The Respondent/Bank has got only 52 unionized employees comprising of 28 clerks and 24 peons and other than these employees , the Bank does not have any other unionized employees working in their fold . The lending of jewel loan constitutes a small portion of the total lending oftheRespondent/Bank. The respondent bank empanelled goldsmiths for a limited purpose of ascertaining the weight, quantity, purity and market value , of the security . Two or three goldsmiths are in the panel of the branch . A prospective customer intending to raise Loans by pledging gets jewels obtains a certificate form any of the goldsmiths in the panel . The charges payable for the professional certificate is paid by the customer directly to the concerned goldsmiths just like engineers and advocates . These goldsmiths in the panel render independent professional opinion on the jewel proposed to be pledged by the Customer with Bank . The goldsmiths are not doing any clerical work and the bank utilizes their professional services forlimited purpose and there is no fixed time to render their services . The respondent bank does not have administrative control over them and for the services rendered by the goldsmiths . The allegation that the goldsmiths are doing their work for 20 years is without any basis. They are not workman and therefore the question of continuous service does not arise at all . There is no employer-employee relationship existing between the panel ofAppraiser and the bank . The Indian Bank case stands in a different footing and they cannot be quoted with the present system of panel Appraisers of the respondent bank. Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays this Tribunal that the claim may be dismissed with costs.
5.Again , the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner's federation has got every competence to represent the jewel appraisers of Respondent/Bank who are members of the federation . It is not true to say that the employment jewel appraiser is only a contract for serve and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised and controlled the work done by jewel appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the jewel appraiser has to do but also the manner in which the jewel appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent/Bank's manual . There is relationship ofmaster and servant between the Respondent and the jewel appraisers in this dispute . Hence , for all these reasons, the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour.
6. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are:-
(i) "Whether the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularize the services of concerned jewel appraisers in the Respondent/Bank is justified" (ii ) To what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ?".
Point No.1:
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is 'whether the jewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] thePetitioner federation or whether the jewel appraisers are only independent contractors and self- styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
8. In order to substantiate their contention , on behalf ofthe Petitioner federation , the concerned jewel appraisers namely Sri G. Subramani , Sri T. Saravanan and. Sri T. Raja were examined as WW1 & WW3 . On behalf of the petitioner, the copy ofjewel loan register page and copy of the jewel loan application and copy of jewel loan demand notice were marked as Ex . W1 to W3 and the copy of order of approval for the inclusion of the name of Sri T. Saravanan was marked as Ex.W4 . The copy of the circular dated 13-06-2003 of the respondent bank was marked as Ex. W5 and the copy of the jewel loan documents were marked as Ex. W6 series . On the side of the respondent one Sri D. Balasubramanian was examined as MW1 but not documents was marked on the side of the respondent .
9. On behalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that jewel appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours . The apparatus , balance and other things are provided to concerned jewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard tojewel loan by the jewel appraisers . Manner of doing the work in the matter of assessing the purity, weight , value etc. has to be done as per . specification , directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appraisal of jewel ' value etc. done by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or, ' , supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore , the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning of Section 2( s) of the I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and 480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months and therefore , they are entitled to be made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Responden/Bank is perennial in nature because the services ofthe jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge ofjewels and the Respondent /Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore, it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees . on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and place of work at the respective branches of the bank. Their work is not of seasonal one and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a similar case with regard to jewel appraiser of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal. Chennai has passed an award in favour of the jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979 , which was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court and 9491
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
also by the Supreme Court and therefore , they are entitled for an award in their favour.
amount paid tojewel appraisers are only commission, which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank . Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any relief as claimed by the Petitioner federation . He also strongly relied on the rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1520 General Manager , Indian Overseas Bank Vs. Workmen, All India Overseas Bank Employees Union , wherein the Supreme Court has held that "jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and canot be absorbed as parttime clerical staff of Indian Overseas Bank. The reason being, unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager , there were no fixed period ofwork and they could come and go at any point of time . The bank did not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application. The amount was paid on commission basis by the loanee and not by the bank. Further , there was no qualification/ age prescribed, no retirement age , no transfer , no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation ." Relying on this decision, learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute . In that case , the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between ' the regular employees and jewel appraisers of the bank , wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case ofjewel appraisers , there is no qualification/age . For regular employees , recruitment is tobedone through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board, but in this case of jewel appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers an in the case ofregular employees , there is fixed working hours , whereas for the jewel appraisers , there is no fixed working hours . The regular employees are paid on monthly basis , but in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case of jewel appraisers there is no disciplinary control . In the case of regular employees , the control/supervision is exercised not only with regard to allocation ofwork, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand, in the case ofjewel appraisers , there is no control/supervision over the nature ofwork to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank, whereas in the case ofjewel appraisers, charges are paid by borrowers . In the case of regular employees , there is retirement age, but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case of jewel appraiser, there is no transfer . The regular employees , when they are in employment, they cannot carry on any other occupation, but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held thatjewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/ Bank and therefore , it set aside the judgement of Division Bench , which affirmed the Tribunal's judgement. Relying on the aforesaid decision , learned counsel for the 10. But , as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business ofproviding loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging ofjewels . But, it cannot be said that jewel appraiser work is of perennial in nature . It is contended on behalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are jewel loans to be granted, a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels , which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes. Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work. Further , when the jewel appraisers are not available , no transaction will take place . They are freeto come at any time during working hours and appraise the jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as the job is over he could leave the establishment without anypermission of the authorities . The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to him as the same depends on his skill , technique , and experience . Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions of Section 2 (s ) of the I.D. Act. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case, In the Indian Bank case , the jewel appraisers work are regular at least for four hours , but in this case , though the Petitioner federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank, there is not even an iota of evidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal. On the other hand, MWI has clearly stated that there were no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any manner by the Managers of the Respondent branches . Further, in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . But , in this case , though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager , it is rot established by the Petitioner federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . Furthermore, in the Indian Bank case, conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted, but it is established in this case that the concerned jewel appraisers were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application . Most important thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case , no amount was paid by the Respondent/Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the 9492
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
Respondent argued that this decision is applicable to the facts of this case and he also argued that it is clearly established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and it is also established in this case that there is no age limit for their retirement . There is no age limit for appointment ofjewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and such is the case , they cannot be called as workmen under the Respondent/bank and they are independent contractors and therefore , at no point of time they can claim regularization .
11. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent .
12. But, on the other hand , on behalf ofthe Petitioner , it is again contended that the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people so as to suitarises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time of work, nature of work and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission butit is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees , borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during the banking hours for service and to the disposal of the Manager of the bank. The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service. Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross examination with regard to jewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank is the same . Under such circumstances, it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's caseis not applicable to the facts of this case .
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot ofdifferences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner.
14. Then again, learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not an industrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the 1.D. Act. The Petitioner federation does not have representative capacity to represent the cause of workers employed in Respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein . The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone , this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 II LLP I NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. Industrial Tribunal, U.P. & Ors . 1964 II LLJ 164 Murugalli Estate , Vs. Indistrial Tribunal , MADRAS 19651 LLP 95 NELLAI COTTON MILLS VS. LABOUR COURT, MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD. Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 I LLJ 349 , 2004 10 SCC 460 and 2006.AIR SCW 1520.
15. But, in this case , as I have already pointed out that since the concernedjewel appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point ..
16. Inview ofmy foregoing findings , I find the demand ofthe Petitioner federation to regularize the services ofthe concerned jewel appraisers is not justified.
Point No. 2 :-
The next point to be decided in this case is to what reliefthe concerned jewel appraisers are entitled?
17. In view of my forgoing findings , I find the concernedjewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief, No costs.
18. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the PA. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 12th June, 2007) .
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined:
For the I Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri G. Subramani WW2 Sri T. Saravanan WW3 Sri T. Raja
For the II Party/Mgnt . : MWI Sri D. Balasubramanian
Documents Marked:
Ex. No. Date
Description
W1 23-05-1995 Jewel Loan Register
W2 11-11-2002 Jewel LoanApplication
W3
15-09-2004
Jewel Loan Credit Card (Identification)
W4
04-06-1991
Appointment Order
W5 13-06-2003 CircularNo. DEV-28/2003-04
W6
Jewel LoanDocument (18-02-2004 17-02-2004)
For the II Party/Management :
Ex.No. Date
Description
-Nil- 9493 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
The Schedule mentioned in that order is :-
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
" Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation , Tamilnadu to regularize the services ofJewel Appraisers (as per Annexure ) by The South Indian Bank Ltd. , Trichur , Kerala is justified? If so , what reliefthe workmen are entitled to ? "
का.आ. 3334. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार साउथ इडियन बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011 /77/2002- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as 86/2003 and issued notices to both, sides: Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
New Delhi , the 24th October , 2007
3. The allegations from the Claim Statement of the Petitioner are briefly as follows:
S.O. 3334. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 86/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of South Indian Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
[No. L- 12011 /77 /2002 - IR(B- I) ]
AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
The Petitioner federation espouses the cause of 3 Jewel Appraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the Appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years. Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months of their respective completed years of service and therefore , they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions ofTamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. The Respondent/Bank, is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge ofjewels .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 12th June , 2007
PRESENT:
K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 86/2003
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section (I) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of The South Indian Bank Ltd. , HeadOffice, Kerala and their workmen]
BETWEEN
: ..... Petitioner
TheGeneral Secretary
All Bank Appraisers ' Federation (Tamilnadu) Affiliatedto CITU (Regn . No. 2863/01 CNI) No. 1 , Kattiyakkaran Street , Cuddalore- 607002
AND
:
The Management,
.Respondent
'The South Indian Bank Ltd. , Head Office , Post Box No. 28 , T.B. Road , MissionQuarters , Trichur, Kerala
Appearance:
For the Petitioner
: Union Representative
M/sT.S. Gopalan &. Co.
For the Management :
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L- 12011 /77 /2002- IR( B - I)] dated 13-5-2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
It is routine day -to-day business of the Respondent/ Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business of the bank . The said money lending business on pledge of jewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable income to the bank on secured loans . Therefore , Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are a regular workmen, have a requisite necessity and the services of jewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . They are skilled workers of the bank having their definite working hours . Further , the bank provides weighing machines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment of quality and value ofjewels . The Respondent/ Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical workswith regard to raising ofjewel loans etc. and therefore , they are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) of I.D. Act . The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable for the business ofthe bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment . In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in I. D. No. 25/1979 directing the management to regularize their service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court . The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/ Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services . Hence , they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure ofconciliation . Therefore , the Petitioner federation prays this Tribunal to pass an award to regularize the services of 9494
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKΑ 26 , 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/bank listed in the Appendix.
Respondent Bank's manual . There is relationship ofmaster and servant between the Respondent and the jewel appraiser in this dispute. Hence , for all these reasons , the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour.
6. In these circumstances , the points for my 1
determination are :-
(i) Whether the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularize the services of concernedjewel appraisers in the Respondent/ Bank isjustified "
(ii) To what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ?" .
Point No. 1 :-
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is whether the jewel appraisers employed in the Respondent Bank are workmen of the Respondent/ Bank as alleged by the Petitioner federation or whether the jewel appraisers are only independent contractors and self- styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
8. In order to substantiate their contention , on behalf of the Petitioner federation , the General Secretary of Petitioner federation Mr. K. Vijayarangan was examined as WW2 and one Sri N. Thiagarajan was examined as WWI and on the side of the petitioner no documents is marked but Ex. M1 namely the signature in an affidavit is marked on the side of the respondent. WW1 in his evidence has admitted that he is also making jewels privately and earning money. From the evidence it is clear that he is not for regularization but only for taising the commission amount .
4. The Respondent alleged in his Counter statement that the Petition is not maintainable before this Tribunal since substantial Section of workmen have not espoused the cause of Jewel Appraisers nor authorized the federation to raise an Industrial Dispute on their behalf. The proof of its authority and competence to raise the dispute on behalf of the Jewel Appraisers is doubtful . The Respondent/Bank advances money to its constituents , one type of loan granted to the constituent is called Gold Loan Scheme which is a loan sanctioned against the deposit of Gold Jewels . The Bank Managers of the respondent are not professional goldsmiths . They are made to acquaint themselves with the manner of assessing the purity of the gold. The Branch is authorized to sanction of loan on the assessment of gold valueby the Branch Manager . They are also empowered to seek the assistance of traditional goldsmiths who are experts in assessing the purity and market value of the gold . Whenever the assistance of expert is sought the borrower is required to meet his charges . In the Respondent Bank, the . Gold LoanScheme did not revoke adequate response . By a revised scheme , the limit for Gold Loan for Appraisal by the branch alone was revised to Rs . 20,000 and only in the case ofloanexceeding Rs . 20,000 , an appraisal shall be made by theBranch Manager and the Appraiser. The manner in which the services of the professional gold appraisal are made use ofby the branches of the Respondent Bank are different from those prevailing in other banks . The selection of the Gold Appraiser is left to the discretion of the concerned BranchManager. There is no permanent employment of Gold Appraiser . There is no written agreement between the Bank and the professional gold appraisers . The Gold Appraiser is not necessary to make any deposit by way of any Security Deposit. In the case ofJewel Loan , appraisal by professional appraiser is waived. There is no restriction for Jewel Appraisers to carry on any other occupation . The Jewel Appraiser is not required to visit the branch nor required to stay in the branch for any fixed duration . The charges for his work are paid by the borrower. No control or supervision is made by the bank officials . Therefore, they cannot be called a regular staff ofthe branch nor can they claim absorption in the services of the bank. Out of the three Jewel Appraisers , Mr. A. Subramanian has not been offering his services for Appraisal for the last one year . The services of Shri G.R. Vetrivel is utilized by Corporation Bank also . The Jewel Appraisers are independent contractors . There is no scope ofabsorbing them in the services of the Respondent/Bank. Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the
claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. Again, the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner's federation has got every competence to represent the jewel appraisers of Respondent/Bank who are members ofthe federation . It is not true to say that the employment jewel appraiser is only a contract for serve and not contract of service . The Respondent Bank supervised and controlled the work done by jewel appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the jewel appraiser has to do but also the manner in which the jewel appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by
9. On behalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that jewel appraisers are working in the Respondent prerhises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours The apparatus , balance and other things are provided to concerned jewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard to jewel loan by the jewel appraisers . Manner of doing the work in the matter of assessing the purity, weight, value etc. has to be done as per specification , directives and circulars issued by, the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appraisal ofjewel value etc. done by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore , the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and 480 days in a continuous period of24 calendar months and therefore , they are entitled to be made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981. It is also contended on behalf ofthe Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Respondent/Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as appla 9495 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग II--खण्ड 3( ii) ]
def the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge of jewels and the Respondent/Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore , it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hohours and place ofwork at the respective branches of the bank. Their work is not of seasonal one and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a similar case with regard to jewel appraiser of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has passed an award in favour of the jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979 , which was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court and also by the Supreme Court and therefore, they are entitled for an award in their favour.
case, though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager , it is not established by the Petitioner federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers. Furthermore , in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted, but it is established in this case that the concemed jewel appraisers . were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application . Most important thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case, no amount was paid by the Respondent/Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the amount paid tojewel appraisers are only commission, which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank, Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any relief as claimed by the Petitioner federation. He also strongly relied on the rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1520GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Vs. WORKMEN , ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION, wherein the Supreme Court has held that " jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and cannot be absorbed as part time clerical staff ofIndian Overseas Bank . The reason being, unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager , there were no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time. The bankdid not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application . The amount was paid on commission basis by the loa nee and not by the bank , Further , there was no qualification/age prescribed , no retirement age, no transfer, no bar, to carry on any avocation or occupation. " Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case . Therefore , the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute. In that case, the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts betweenthe regular employees and jewel appraisers ofthe bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas, in the case ofjewel appraisers, there is no qualification/age . For regular employees , recruitment is to be done through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board, but in this case of jewel appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case of regular employees, there is fixed working hours , whereas for the jewel appraisers , there is no fixed working hours . The regular employees are paid on monthly basis, but in the case of jewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case of jewel appraisers there is no disciplinary control . In the case of regular employees , the control/supervision is exercised not only with regard to allocation ofwork, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand, in the case ofjewel appraisers, there is no control/supervision over the nature 10. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business of providing loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging ofjewels . But, it cannot be said that jewel appraiserwork is ofperennial in nature . It is contended on behalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are jewel loans to be granted, a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels , which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction nay not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work . Further, when the jewel appraisers are not available, no transaction will take place . They are free to come at any time during working hours and appraise the jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as the job is over he could leave the establishment without any permission ofthe authorities. The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to hiin as the same depends on his skill, technique, and experience . Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions of Section 2(s ) of the I.D. Act. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended thatthe IndianBank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case. In the Indian Bank case, the jewel appraisers work are regular at least for four hours, but in this case , though the Petitioner federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank , there is not even an iota of evidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal. On the other hand, MWI has clearly stated that there were not fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any manner by the Managers of the Respondent branches . Further , in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . But, in this
4506 GI/07-14 9496
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein. The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone , this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported- in 1957 II LLP 1 NEWSPAPERS LTD. VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, U.P. & ORS 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGALLI ESTATE , Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , MADRAS 1965 I LLP 95 NELLAI COTTON MILLS VS. LABOUR COURT , MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD. Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 I LLJ 349,2004 10 SCC 460 and 2006 AIR SEW 1520 .
15. But, in this case, as I have already pointed out that since the concerned jewel appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point.
16. Inview ofmy foregoing findings, I find the demand ofthe Petitioner Federation to regularize the services of the concerned jewel appraisers is notjustified. Point-No . 2:
of work to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank, whereas in the case ofjewel appraisers , charges are paid by borrowers . In the case of regular employees , there is retirement age, but, for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case ofjewel appraiser, there is no transfer. The regular employees, when they are in employment, they cannot carry on any other occupation , but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held that jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and therefore, it set aside the judgement of Division Bench, which affirmed the Tribunal's judgement . Relying on the aforesaid decision, learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this decision is squarely applicable to the facts of this case and he also argued that one of the concerned jewel appraisers has admitted that he is doing jewel making business and is earning money. Thus , it is clearly established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and there is no age limit for their retirement. Thus , there is no age limit for appointment ofjewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and such is the case, they cannot be called as workman under the Respondent/ bank and they are independent contractors and therefore , at no point of time they can claim regularization .
The next point to be decided in this case is to what reliefthe concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ?
11.I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent .
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief. No costs.
18. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th June , 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Exarnined :-
For the I Party/Petitioner : WW1 Sri Thiagarajan WW2 Sri Vijayarangan
Nil
:
Forthe II Party/Mgmt .
Documents Marked:-
Date
Ex. No.
Description
Nil
For the Il Party/Management :
EX. No.
Date
Description
MI
27-4-2004
12.But, on the other hand, on behalfof the Petitioner , it is again contended that the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only, profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people so as to sult arises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time ofwork, nature of work and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission but it is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees, borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during the banking hours for service and to the disposal of the Manager of the bank. The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service . Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross exarnination with regard tojewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank is the same . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts ofthis case .
Affidavitsubmitted by Sri N.Thiagarajan
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot of differences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner .
का.आ. 3335, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्यामान ग्रामा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । 14. Then again , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not anjindustrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the I.D. Act . The Petitioner federation does not have the representative capacity to represent the cause of workers employed in Respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or
[सं. एल-12011/70/2002- आई आर( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 9497 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
NewDelhi , the 24th October , 2007
3.The allegations from the Claim Statement of the Petitioner are briefly as follows:
S.O. 3335.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 92/2003) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court, Chennai , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Adhiyaman Grama Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
[No. L- 12011/70/2002- IR(B- I) ] AJAY KUMAR, DeskOfficer
ANNEXURE
The Petitioner Federation espouses the cause of 7 Jewel Appraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in theAppendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent/Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years . Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months of their respective completed yearsof service and therefore , they are each entitled tobe made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981. The Respondent/Bank is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge ofjewels .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 12th June , 2007
Present : K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer Industrial Despute No.92/2003
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 147), between the Management of Adhiyaman Grama Bank , Dharmapuri and their workmen]
BETWEEN
.....Petitioner/
The General Secretary
IParty
All Bank Appraisers ' Federation
(Tamilnadu)
Affiliated to CITU
(Regn . No. 2863/01 CNI) No. 1 , Kattiyakkaran Street Cuddalore-607002
AND
: .....Respondent/
The Management
IIParty
AdhiyamanGrama Bank, 1stFloor , New DDDC Building, Collectorate, P. O. Dharmapuri -636705 .
Appearance:
:
Forthe Petitioner
Union Representative
FortheManagement : M/sKing & Partridge
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L- 12011 /70/2002 [ IR (B -I) ] dated 20-5-2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The Schedule mentioned in that order is :
It isroutineday-to-day business of the Respondent/ Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business ofthe bank. The said money lending business on pledge of jewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable income to the bank on secured loans . Therefore , Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are regular workmen , have become a requisite necessity and the services ofjewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . They are skilled workers of the bank having their ,definite working hours . Further , the bank provides , weighing machines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment ofquality and value ofjewels. The Respondent/ Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical works with regard to raising of Jawel loans etc, and therefore, they are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) of I.D, Act . The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable forb , the business of the bank and it forms , an integral part of the business and establishment . In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in I.D. No. 25/1979, directing the management to regularize their service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court.. The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/ Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services . Hence , they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure ofconciliation . Therefore , the Petitioner Federations prays this Tribunal to pass an award to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/bank listed in the Appendix.
" Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation , Tamilnadu to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers (as per Annexure ) by Adhiyaman Grama Bank , Dharmapuri , Tamil Nadu is justified? If so , what relief the workmen are entitled to ? "
4.The Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged that on 27-12-1985 under Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 , it has been sponsored by the Indian Bank to cater to the needs of public in Dharmapuri district . It has got only 25 branches within Dharmapuri district and it has got 55 unionized employees comprising of 28 clerks and 27 peons . Other than these employees , the Respondent/Bank does not have any other employees working in their fold. The 2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 92/2003 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
9498
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKΑ 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
8. In order to substantiate their contention, on behalf of the Petitioner federation, the General Secretary of Petitioner federation Mr. K. Vijayarangan was examined as WW2 and one Sri.C. Krishnachari was examined as WW1 . On the side of the respondent, one Sri S. James Selvaraj , the General Management of the respondent bank was examined as MW1 . On the side of the petitioner , the jewel loan application is marked as Ex . WI . On the side of the respondent , Ex.MI to M8 were marked out ofwhich EX.M1 to M7 are the letters written by the concerned gold appraisers to the petitioner federation that they have given any consent for raising this dispute and therefore they requested the federation to withdraw the same. Ex.M8 is the copy of circular issued by the respondent bank with regard to jewel loans in the newly opened branches and with regard to empanelment of Appraisers . On behalf of the petitioner federation , the letters EX.MI to M7 are obtained by coercion and by thread but no appraiser has cometo this Tribunal to say that these letters were obtained by coercion.
lending of jewel loans constitutes a small portion of the total lending of the Respondent/Bank . The Respondent/ Bank empanelled Goldsmiths for a limited purpose of ascertaining the weight , quality , purity and market value of the security . Two or three Goldsmiths are in the panel of such branch . A prospective customer intending to raise a loan by pledging gold jewels obtains a certificate from any ofthese Goldsmiths in the panel . The charges payable for the professional certificate is paid by the customer directly to the concerned Goldsmiths . Just like Engineers and Advocates , these Goldsmiths in the panel render independent professional opinion on the jewel proposed to be pledged by the customer in the Bank. The Goldsmiths are not doing any clerical work and the bank utilizes their professional services for limited purpose and there is no fixed time to render their services . The Respondent/Bank does not have administrative control over them and for the services rendered by the Goldsmiths. The allegation that theGoldsmiths are doing their work for 20 years is without any basis . They are not workmen and therefore the question of continuous service does not arise at all . There is no employer employee relationship existing between the panel ofAppraisers and the Bank. The Indian Bank case stands in a different footing and they cannot be quoted with the present system of Panel Appraisers of the Respondent Bank . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.
5.Again, the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner's Federation has got every competence to represent the jewel appraisers of Respondent/Bank who aremembers of the Federation. It is not true to say that the employment jewel appraiser is only a contract for serve and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised and controlled the work done by jewel appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the jewel appraiser has to do but also the manner in which the jewel appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent/Bank's manual . There is relationship ofmaster and servant between the Respondent and the jewel appraisers in this dispute . Hence , for all these reasons , the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour.
6. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are:
(1) " Whether the demand of the Petitioner Federation to regularize the services of concernedjewel appraisers in the Respondent/ Bank isjustified "
(ii) " To what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled? " .
PointNo. 1:
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is 'whether the jewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by thePetitioner federation or whether the jewel appraisers are only independent contractors and self- styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
9.Onbehalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that jewel appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours . The apparatus , balance and other things are provided to concernedjewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard tojewel loan by the jewel appraisers . Manner of doing the work on the matter of assessing the purity, weight, value etc. has to be done as per specification , directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appralsal of jewel value etc. done by thejewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes . vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning of Section 2(s) ofthe I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than, 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months and therefore, they are entitled to be made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981. It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the work ofjewel appraiser in the Respondent/ Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge ofjewels and the Respondent /Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore, it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and place of work at the respective branches of the bank. Their work is not of seasonal one and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a srmilar case with regard tojewel appraiser of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has passed an award in favour of the jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979 , which 9499
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court and also by the Supreme Court and therefore , they are entitled for an award in their favour .
commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the amount paid to jewel appraisers are only commission, which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank, Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees ofthe Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any relief as claimed by the Petitioner federation . He also strongly relied on the rulings reported in 2006 AIR sew 1520 GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Vs. WORKMEN , ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION, wherein the Supreme Court has held that"jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and cannot be absorbed as part time clerical staff of Indian Overseas Bank. The reason being, unlike regular employees appointed by bank , the' jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager, there were no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time. The bankdid not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application . The amount was paid on commission basis by the loanee and not by the bank. Further, there was no, qualification/age prescribed, no retirement age , no transfer , no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation Relying on this decision, learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore , the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute. In that case , the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between the regular employees and jewel appraisers ofthe bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no qualification/age . For regular employees, recruitment is to be done through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board , but in this case ofjewel appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case of regular employees , there is fixed working hours , whereas for the jewel appraisers , there isno fixed working hours , The regular employees are paid on monthly basis, but in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case of jewel appraisers there is no disciplinary control . In the case of regular employees , the control/supervision is exercised not onlywith regard to allocation of work, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand , in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no control / supervision over the nature of work to be performed by them. With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank, whereas in the case ofjewel appraisers , " charges are paid by borrowers . In the case, of regular employees , there is retirement age , but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case of jewel appraiser , there is no transfer . The regular employees , when they are in employment , they cannot carry on any other occupation , but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held that jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and therefore, it set aside the judgement of Division Bench, which affirmed 10. But , as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business ofproviding loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging ofjewels . But , it cannot be said that jewel appraiser work is ofperennial in nature . It is contended on behalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are jewel loans to be granted, a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels, which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work . Further , when the jewel appraisers are not available , no transaction will take place . They are free to come at any time during working hours and appraise the jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as - the job is over he could leave the establishment without any permission ofthe authorities . The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to him as the same depends on his skill , technique , and experience , Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated , under provisions of Section 2 (s ) ofthe I.D. Act. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the IndianBank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case . In the Indian Bank case , the jewel appraisers work are regular at least for four hours , but in this case , though the Petitioner federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank, there is not even an iota of evidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal . On the other hand , MW1 has clearly stated that there were not fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any manner- by the Managers of the Respondent branches . Further , in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinar , y control over the jewel appraisers . But, in this case , though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager , it is not established by the Petitioner federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . Furthermore , in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted, but it is established in this case that the concerned jewel appraisers were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application . Most important thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case , no amount was paid by the Respondent Bank neither as 9500
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
the Tribunal's judgement . Relying on the aforesaid decisions , the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this decision is squarely applicable to the facts of this case and he also argued that it is clearly established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and it is also established in this case that there is no age limit for their retirement and there is no age limit for appointment ofjewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and such is the case, they cannot be called as workman under the Respodent/ bank and they are independent contractors and therefore , at no point of time they can claim regularization.
11. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent.
12. But, on the other hand , on behalf ofthe Petitioner , it is again contended that the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people so as to suit arises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time of work, nature of work and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission but it is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees , borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during the banking hours for service and to the disposal of the Manager of the bank. The service between the management and workers ofservice is only a contract of service and not a contract of service. Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross examination with regard to jewel appraisal work done bythe IndianBank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank is the same Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case.
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot ofdifferences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner .
14. Then again , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not an industrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the I.D. Act . The Petitioner federation does not have the representative capacity to represent the cause of workers employed in Respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein , The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone, this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 II LLP I NEWSPAPERS LTD . Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, U. P. & ORS 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGAILI ESTATE , Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, MADRAS 1965 I LLP 95
[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]
NELLAI COTTON MILLS Vs. LABOUR COURT , MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD. Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 ILLJ 349 , 2004 10 SCC460 and 2006AIR SCW 1520 .
15. But, in this case , as I have already pointed out that since the concernedjewel appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point.
16. In view ofmy foregoing findings , I find the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularize the services ofthe concernedjewel appraisers is notjustified.
Point No. 2 :-
The next point to be decided in this case is to what reliefthe concerned jewel appraisers are entitled?
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief, No costs .
18. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the PA . transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th June, 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined:-
Forthe I Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri C. Krishnachari WW2 Sri Vijayarangan
Forthe II Party/Mgmt. : MW1 Sri S. James Selvaraj
Documents Marked :-
EX. No.
Date
Deseription
W1
23-6-2004 Jewel LoanApplication
For the II Party/Management :
Date
EX. No.
Description
M1
2005
Letter from Kamala Kannan to the I PartyUnion
M2
1-2-2005 Letter from S. Muthaiyan to the I PartyUnion
M3
5-2-2005 Letter from Krishnachari to
the I PartyUnion
M4
2005
Letter from M. Angachari to the I Party Union
M5
2-2-2005 Letter from C. Nagapushan to the I Party Union
M6
3-2-2005 Letter from Nanjundachari to the I Party Union
M7
9-2-2005 Letter from Vengadagiri Achari to the I Party Union
M8
3-8-2005 AdhyamanGrama Bank- Circular No. 18/88- Empanel of Jewel Loans in the newly opened branches -Empanelment of Appraisers.
[ भाग -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9501
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 12011 / 68 /2002- IR(B - I ) dated 20-5-2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The Schedule mentioned in that order is :
का.आ. 3336.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार लक्ष्मी विलास बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के 'बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 95/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12011 /68/2002 - आई आर ( बी-I ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी
"Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation, Tamilnadu to regularize the service of Jewel Appraisers ( as per Annexure) by The Lakshmi VilasBank Ltd. , Head Office, Karur isjustified? Ifso , what relief the workmen are entitled to ? "
NewDelhi, the 24th October, 2007
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as 95/2003 and is , isued notices to both , sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations from the Claim Statement of the Petitioner are briefly as follows :
S.O. 3336. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 95/2003 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Chennai, as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Lakshini Vilas Bank Ltd. , and their workman , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007.
[No. L- 12011 /68/2002 - IR (B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 12th June , 2007
Present : K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
Industrial Despute No. 95/2003
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between theManagement of The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd , Karur and theirworkmen]
BETWEEN
: ..... Petitioner
The General Secretary
All Bank Appraisers ' Federation (Tamilnadu) Affiliated to CITU (Regn . No. 2863/01 CNI) No. 1 , Kattiyakkaran Street Cuddalore-607002
AND
The Manageinent
: .....Respondent
The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd. HeadOffice, P. B. No. 2 , Salem Road, Kathaparai Karur-639006
Appearance:
For the Petitioner : Union Representative
The Petitioner federation espouses the cause of 19 Jewel Appraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the Appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years . Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months of their respective completed years of service and therefore, they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. The Respondent/Bank, is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge of jewels . It is routine day -to-day business of the Respondent/Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business of the bank, The said money lending business on pledge of jewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable income to the bank on secured loans . Therefore , Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are a regular workmen , have a requisite necessity, and the services of Jewel Appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment. They are skilled workers of the bank having their definite working hours . Further , the bank provides weighing machines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment of quality and value ofjewels . The Respondent/ Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical works with regard to raising ofjewel loans etc. and therefore, they are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) of I.D. Act . The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable for the business of the bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment . In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award For the Management : M/ sT.S. Gopalan & . Cb .
9502
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929,
in I. D. No. 25/1979 directing the management to regularize the ir service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court. The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/ Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services , Hence , they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure of conciliation . Therefore , the Petitioner federation prays thisTribunal to pass an award to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/bank listed in the Appendix.
4. The Respondent in the Counter Statement alleged:
The Respondent Bank is a private Banking Company having its Head Office at Karur . One type of loan granted to its constituentsby the , Respondent Bank is called as Jewel Loan which is a loan sanctioned against deposit of goldjewels. In order to assess the value of the gold jewel, the Respondent Bank engaged Jewel Appraisers who are acquainted with the method of assessing the value of gold jewels . The Respondent Bank does not grant jewel loans at all the branches . Even in the branches where jewel loan are sanctioned, there are specified days in a week when jewel loan applications are entertained . There is no scope to carry on the work of Jewel Appraiser for the entire normal business hours nor the work will involve definite hours . The work of Jewel Appraiser does not require control or supervision by the bank officials . The Jewel Appraisers have their own occupation . The charges that are paid to the Jewel Appraisers are debited to the account of the borrower and therefore the services rendered by the Jewel Appraiser should be deemed to be service rendered to the borrower. There is no minimum guarantee remuneration . They are paid only commission and the value of the jewel loans sanctioned. They arefree to carry on their own occupation. They are not subject to disciplinary control of the bank officials . The engagement of Jewel Appraisers is similar to the engagement of a Lawyer , Auditor or a Medical Offider. Therefore , there is no scope for regularization their services in the Respondent Bank. Since Jewel Áppraisers are not in the employment of Respondent Bank, the provisions of Tamil Nadu (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen ) Act, 1981 would not apply . The Jewel Appraisers are not required to do any clerical other than filling up the certificate about the value ofjewels appraised by them . The Indian Bank case is not relevant to this case and the facts of that case are entirely different , hence for all these reasons, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. Again , the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner's federation has got every competence to represent the Jewel Appraisers of Respondent/Bank who are members of the federation . It is not true to say that the employment Jewel Appraiser is only a contract for serve
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised and controlled the work done by Jewel Appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the Jewel Appraiser has to do but also the manner in which the Jewel Appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent/Bank's manual. There is relationship of master and servant between the Respondent and the Jewel Appraisers in this dispute . Hence , for all these reasons , the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour .
6. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are :
(1) " Whether the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularize the services of concerned Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank is justified"
(ii) "To what reliefthe concerned Jewel Appraisers are entitled?"
Point No. 1 :-
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is "whether the jewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by the Petitioner federation or whether the Jewel Appraisers are only idependent contractors and self - styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
8. In order to substantiate their contention , on behalf ofthe Petitioner federation , the concerned goldsmith was examined as WW1 on the side of the petitioner , the copy of the jewel loan application was marked as Ex . W1 , the copy of the judgement in Indian Overseas Bank in WA 465/2001 was marked as Ex . W2 . The copy of the order in India Bank case by the Supreme Court was marked as Ex . M3 and the copy of the judgement of the Indian Bank by the Industrial Tribunal in ID 25/57 is marked as Ex . W4. On the side of the respondent the copy of the circular with regard to engagement of appraisers were marked as Ex . M 1 to M3 and M6 and the copy of the circular with regard to commission payable to the appraisers were marked as Ex. M7 to M11 and the copy of the dispute raised by the petitioner was marked as Ex . M4 and the copy of their reply statement was marked as Ex . M5.1
9. On behalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that Jewel Appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours. The apparatus , balance and other things are provided to concerned Jewel Appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were alsomaintained with regard tojewel loan by the Jewel Appraisers. Manner ofdoingthe work in the matter ofassessing the purity, weight, value etc. has to be done as per specification, directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9503 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Head Office . Appraisal of jewel value etc : done by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore , the concemed jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and 480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months and therefore , they are entitled to be made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Respondent/Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge of jewels and the Respondent/Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore, it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment. It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and place ofwork at the respective branches ofthe bank. Their work is not seasonal one and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a similar case with regard tojewel appraiser ofIndian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has passed an award in favour of the jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25 / 1979 , which was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court and also by the Supreme Court and therefore, they are entitled for an award in their favour .
loanee
and not by 10. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business of providing loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging ofjewels . But, it cannot be said that jewelappraiserwork is ofperennial in nature. It is contended onbehalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are jewel loans tobe granted, a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels; which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work . Further , when the jewel appraisers are not available , no transaction will take place . They are
free to come at any time during working hours and appraise the jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as the job is over he could leave the establishment without any permission of the authorities . The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to him as the same depends on his skill , technique , and. experience . Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions of Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case. In the Indian Bank case, the jewel appraisers work are regular at least for four hours , but in this case, though the Petitioner federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank, there is not even an iota of evidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal . On the other hand, MW1 has clearly stated that there were not fixed period of work and theycould come and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any manner by the Managers of the Respondent branches. Further , in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers. But, in this case, though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager , it is not Vestablished by the Petitioner federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over thejewel appraisers. Furthermore , in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted, but it is established in this case that the concerned-jewel appraisers were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application . Most important thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case, no amount was paid by the Respondent/Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the amount paid tojewel appraisers are only commission, which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank . Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees ofthe Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any relief as claimed by the Petitioner federation. He also strongly relied onthe rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1520 GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Vs. WORKMEN, ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION , whereinthe Supreme Court has held that "jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and cannot be absorbed as part time clerical staff of Indian Overseas Bank. The reason being, unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager, therewere no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any pointoftime. The bank did not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application. The amount was paid on commission basis by the
4506GI/07--15 9504
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKΑ 26 , 1929
12. But, on the other hand, on behalf of the Petitioner , it is again contneded that the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people so as to suit arises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time of work nature of work and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission but it is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees, borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during the banking hours for service and to the disposal of the Manager of the bank. The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service . Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross examination with regard tojewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/ Bank is the same . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts ofthis case .
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot of differences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such, I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner.
the bank. Further , there was no qualification/ age prescribed, no retirement age , no transfer , no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation . " Relying on this decision, learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, the Petitioner is not entitled to any reliefin this dispute. In that case , the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between the regular employees and jewel appraisers of the bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no qualification/ age. For regular employees , recruitment is to be done through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board, but in this case of jewel appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case ofregular employees , there is fixed working hours , whereas for the jewel appraisers , there is no fixed working hours . The regular employees are paid on monthly basis , but in the case of jewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no disciplinary control . In the case of regular employees , the control /supervision is exercised not only with regard to allocation of work, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand, in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no control/supervision over the nature of work to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank , whereas in the case of jewel appraisers , charges are paid by borrowers. In the case of regular employees there is retirement age, but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case ofjewel appraiser , there is no transfer . The regular employees , when they are in employment , they cannot carry on any other occupation , but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held that jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and therefore, it set aside the judgement of Division Bench, which affirmed the Tribunal's judgement .
14. Then again, learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not an industrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the I.D. Act . The Petitioner federation does not have the representative capacity to represent the cause of workers employed in Respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein . The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone , this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 II LLP 1 NEWS PAPERS LTD . VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, U.P. &. ORS 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGALLI ESTATE , Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, MADRAS 1965 1 LLP 95 NELLAI COTTON MILLS Vs. LABOUR COURT, MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD. Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 I LLJ 349 , 2004 10 SCC 460 and 2006 AIR SCW 1520 .
Relying ofthe aforesaid decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this decision is squarely applicable to the facts of this case and he also argued that it is clearly established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and it is also established in this case that there is no age limit for their retirement and further there is no age limit for appointment of jewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and such is the case , they cannot be called as workman under the Respondent/bank and they are independent contractors and therefore, at no point oftime they can claim regularization.
15. But , in this case , as I have already pointed out that since the concerned jewel appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point .
11.1 find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent .
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
9505
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
16.Inview ofmy foregoing findings , I find the demand ofthe Petitioner federation to regularize the services ofthe concerned jewel appraisers is not justified .
Point No. 2 :-
The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled?
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief, No costs .
18. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th June , 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :-
Forthe I Party/Petitioner : WW1 Sri M. Ramasubbu For the II Party/Management : Nil
Documents Marked :----
Ex.Nos . Date
Description
W1
Nil
Jewels Loan Document and D- 1Credit-Debit J. L. Card W2
18-2-2004 High Court Revision Bench Judgement (Indian Overseas Bank Appraisers) Case No. 465/01
W3
22-10-1990 Supreme Court Judgement CaseNo. 10054/1990 W4
3-12-1990 Central Government Industrial Tribunal at Chennai , Case No. 25/1957 (Indian Bank, Appraisers) For the II Party/ Management :-
Ex. Nos . Date
Description
M1
21-10-1980 Circular issued by II Party regarding engagement of appraisers on commission basis.
M2
26-7-1982 Circular issuedby II Party regarding engagement of Appraisers
M3
17-6-1983 Circular issued by II Party regarding assessment of Jewel LoanAppraisers M4
Nil
Dispute raisedby Petitioner before Asstt . Commissioner ofLabour (Central) M5
18-2-2002 Reply statement of Management to Asstt. Commissioner of Labour (C) Date
Ex.Nos.
Description
M6
17-5-1989 Letter from Pers Dept toMgr .
Tirunelveli Town reg . engagement of appraiser on commission basis
M7
4-1-1992 Circular reg . commission' payable to appraisers .
M8
8-11-1993 Circular reg . commission basis appraisers
M9
8-11-1993 Circular reg. entrustingjobs to appraisers .
M10
8-6-1994 Circular reg . rate of commissionpayable to Jewel Appraisers
M11
9-3-1999
-do- नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2007
का.आ. 3337.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावनकोर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निमोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 94/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12011/69/2002- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th October , 2007
S.O. 3337.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 94/2003) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Chennai , as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Travancore, andtheir workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
[No. L-12011/69/2002 - IR(B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 12th June,2007
Present : K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer Industrial Despute No. 94/2003
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause(d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 147) , between the Management of The State Bank of Travancore (Associate of the State Bank of India) , Chennai and their workmen] 9506
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] BETWEEN
: .....Petitioner
TheGeneral Secretary
All Bank Appraisers ' Federation
Affiliated to CITU
(Tamilnadu) (Regn . No. 2863/01 CNI ) No, 1 , Katțiyakkaran Street Cuddalore-607002
AND
:
.....Respondent
TheManagement
State Bank ofTravancore (Associate of State Bank of India) Zonal Office, 304, 305 Anna Salai Teynampet Chennai -600086
Appearance:
For the Petitioner : Union Representative
:
For the Management
M/sS. Jayaraman, H. Balají and V. V. Balasubramanian
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 12011 /69/2002 - IR(B- I) ) dated 20.05.2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The Schedule mentioned in that order is:
"Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation, Tamilnadu to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers (as per Annexure ) by State Bank of Travancore, Zonal Office, Chennai is justified ? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to? "
role in the business of the bank, The said money lending business on pledge ofjewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable' income to thebank on secured loans . Therefore , Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are regular workmen, have become a requisite necessity and the services ofjewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . They are skilled workers of the bank having their definite working hours . Further , the bank provides weighing machines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment of quality and value of jewels . The Respondent/Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical works with regard to raising ofjewel loans etc. and therefore , they are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) of I.D. Act . The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable for the business of the bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment. In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in ID. No. 25/1979 directing the management to regularize their service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court . The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services . Hence, they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure of conciliation . Therefore , the Petitioner federations prays this Tribunal to pass an award to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/bank listed in the Appendix .
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 94/2003 and issued notices to both sides, Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations from the Claim Statement of the Petitioner are briefly as follows :
The Petitioner federation espouses the cause of 4 Jewel Appraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the Appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years.. Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months of their respective completed years of service and therefore , they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status toWorkmen) Act, 1981. The Respondent/Bank is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge of jewels . It is routine day- to-day business of the Respondent/Bank and that it has assumed a predorninant
4. In the Counter Statement , it is alleged that the Respondent herein is an Associate of the State Bank of India. Ithas branches throughout the States of Tamilnadu. In theRespondent/Bank , appraisers are engaged in certain branches on a casual basis for appraising the jewels . This itself is very sporadic in nature. It is not as if this , work is perpetual and continuous in nature . There is absolutely no scope either for part time or permanent job . The Respondent/Bank has no supervision or control over the Appraisers . The Respondent/Bank also does not give any direction as to the manner in which the Appraisers shall do. their work . There is no fixed hours of work for these Appraisers . The bank has no obligation to allot them the work. There is no master or servant relationship between the Appraisers and the Bank. The concerned federation has no locus standi to raise the dispute and the concemed Appraisers are not employees of the bank. There is no espousal of the present dispute by a substantial number of workmen and on this ground itself the dispute is to be rejected. It is false to allege that they have put in more than 9507 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
regarding assessment is marked as Ex.M2 and the application for gold loan was mared as Ex.M4.
480 days of service in a period of 24 calendar months . Moreover , Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 is not applicable to the Respondent/Bank since it is an establishment under the Central Government. Concerned Jewel Appraisers were paid service charges as and when their services were utilized. Only for the purpose of uniformity in the matter of weighing, the bank provided weighing machine and other instruments instead of permitting the Jewel Appraisers to use their own weighing machines and other instruments . The Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
.5. Again , the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioners federation has got every competence to represent the jewel appraisers of Respondent/Bank who are members of the federation . It is not true to say that the employment jewel appraiser is only a contract for serve and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised and controlled the work done by jewel appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the jewel appraiser has to do but also the manner in which the jewel appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent/Bank's manual . There is relationship ofmaster and servant between the Respondent and the jewel appraisers in this dispute . Hence , for all these reasons, the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour .
6. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are:
"(i) Whether the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularize the services of concerned jewel appraisers in the Respondent/ Bank isjustified ?
( ii) To what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ? "
Point No. 1 :
7. The crucial .. point to be decided in this case is whether the jewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by the Petitioner federation or whether the jewel appraisers are only independent contractors and self styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
9. On behalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that jewel appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours . The apparatus, balance and other things are provided to concerned jewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard tojewel loan; by the jewel appraisers. Manner of doing the work in the matter of assessing the purity, weight, value etc. has to be done as per specification, directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appraisal of jewel value etc. done by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches. The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning ofSection 2(s) ofthe I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months , and therefore, they are entitled to be made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981. It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Respondent/Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge of jewels and the Respondent/Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore , it has become necessary that thejewel appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and place ofwork at the respective branches of the bank. Their work is not of seasonal one and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner.that in a similar case with regard to jewelr appraiser of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has passed an award in favour ofthe jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979, which was upheld by the Division Bench of theHigh Court and also by the Supreme Court and therefore, they are entitled for an award in their favour.
10. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business of providing loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging ofjewels. But , it cannot be said that jewel appraiser work is ofperennial in nature. It is contended on behalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of 8. In order to substantiate their contention , on behalf of the Petitioner federation, the concerned goldsmith viz. Sri Karunanidhi was examined as WW1 and the copy of the jewel loan application was marked as Ex. W1 . On the side of the respondent , one Smt . G. Thanuja Kumari , Chief Manager of the (Advances) of the respondent bank was examined as MW1 and copy of the circulars issued by the respondent bank with regard to jewel loan advances are marked as Ex. M1 , M3 and M5 and the copy ofthe certificate 9508
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007 /KARTIKAΑ 26, 1929
[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii) ]
All India Overseas Bank Employees Union , wherein the Supreme Court has held that " jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and cannot be absorbed as part time clerical staff of Indian Overseas Bank. The reason being, unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager , there were no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time. The bank did not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application. The amount was paid on commission basis by the loanee and not by the bank. Further , there was no qualification/ age prescribed, no retirement age , no transfer , no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation. " Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case . Therefore, the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute. In that case , the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between the regular employees and jewel appraisers of the bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case ofjewel appraisers , there is no qualification/ age . For regular employees, recruitment is tobedone through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board , but in this case of jewel appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case of regular employees , there is fixed working hours, whereas for thejewel appraisers , there is no fixed working hours. The regular employees are paid on monthly basis, but in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no diseiplinary control . In the case of regular employees, the control/ supervision is exercised not only with regard to allocation ofwork, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand, in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no control/ supervision over the nature ofwork to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank, whereas in the case of jewel appraisers , charges are paid by borrowers. In the case of regular employees , there is retirement age , but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case of jewel appraiser, there is no transfer . The regular employees , when they are in employment , they cannot carry on any other occupation, but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held that jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/ Bank and therefore , it set aside the judgement of Division Bench, which affirmed the Tribunal's judgement . Relying on the aforesaid decisions , learned counsel for the work for the jewel appraisers. Whenever there are jewel loans to be granted , a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels , which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work. Further , when the jewel appraisers are not available, no transaction will take place . They are freeto come at any time during working hours and appraise the jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as thejob is over he could leave the establishment without anypermission of the authorities . The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to him as the same depends on his skill , technique and experience . Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions of Section 2( s) of the I. D. Act.Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended thatthe IndianBank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case. In the Indian Bank case , the jewel appraisers work are regular at least for four hours , but in this case, though the Petitioner federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank, there is not even an iota of evidence to establish.this fact before this Tribunal . On the other hand, MW1 has clearly stated that there were not fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any manner by the Managers of the Respondent branches . Further, in Indian Bank case, it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . But, in this case, though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager, it is not established by the Petitioner federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers. Furthermore , in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted, but it is established in this case that the . concerned jewel appraisers wer.e not required to sign attendance register and also theywere not required to make any leave application. Most important thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case , no amount was paid by the Respondent/Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the amount paid tojewel appraisers are only commission ,which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank. Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any relief as claimed by the Petitioner federation. He also strongly relied on the rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW
Respondent argued that this decision is applicable to the 1520 General Manager , Indian Overseas Bank Vs. Workmen 9509 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 II LLP 1 NEWSPAPERS LTD . Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , U. P. & ORS . 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGALLI ESTATE, VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, MADRAS 1965 ILLP 95 NELLAI COTTON MILLS VS. LABOUR COURT, MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 .
facts of this case and he also argued that it is clearly established that there is no har to carry on his own business or occupation and it is also established in this case that there is no age limit for their retirement and further there is 'no age limit for appointment ofjewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and such is the case , they cannot be called as workmen under the Respondent/bank and they are independent contractors and therefore , at no point of timethey can claim regularization .
VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD . Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 I LLJ 349, 2004 10 SCC 460 and 2006 AIR SCW 1520.
11.1 find much force in the contention of the leamed counsel for the Respondent .
15. But, in this case , as I have already pointed out that since the concerned jewel appraisers as are not workmen under Respondent/Bank , I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point .
16. Inview ofmy foregoing findings , I find the demand of the Petitioner Federation to regularize the services of the concerned jewel appraisers is not justified.
Point No. 2 :-
The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ?
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief. No costs .
18. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P. A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th June, 2007) .
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined :-
: WW1 Sri M. Karunanidhi
Forthe I Party/Petitioner
12. But, on the other hand , on behalfofthe petitioner, it is again contended that the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people so as to suit arises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time of work, nature ofwork and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission but it is heing paid only through the bank , though it might be collected by the hank from loanees , borrowers . The appraisers are available in the hank during the banking hours for service and to the disposal of the Manager of the bank . The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service . Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross examination with regard to jewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent Bank is the same . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of thiscase.
For the II Party/Management : MW1 Smt . G. Thanuja Kumary
Documents Marked :-
Date
Ex. No.
Description
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot of differences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such, I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner.
WI
26-7-2004 Jewel Loan Application
For the II Party/Management :
Ex. No.
Date
Description
Ml
16-10-75 Circularissuedby State Bank ofTravancore .
M2
Nil
Format of Certificate regarding Assessment and value of the Jewel .
21-7-99
M3
Head Office Circular
M4
Nil
Application for Gold Loan andtheCertificate issued by the Appraisers .
14. Then again , learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not an industrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the I.D. Act . The Petitioner Federation does not have the representative capacity, to represent the case of workers employed in Respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein. The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone, this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for the M5
23-10-99
Circular issued to the Branches .
9510,
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/ KARTIKA 26 , 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication. The Schedule mentioned dispute in the order of reference is as follows :
"Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation, Tamil Nadu to regularize the services ofJewel Appraisers (as per annexure) in the management ofCity Union Bank Ltd. is justified? If so,what reliefthe workmen are entitled to?" का.आ. 3338. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सिटी यूनियन बैंक को प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई.डी सं. 101/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12011 /29/2002-आई आर( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
2.After the receipt of the reference , it was taken on file as I.D. No. 101/2003 and notices were issued to both the parties and both parties have entered appearance through their authorised representative/advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.
New Delhi, the 24th October, 2007
3. The allegations of the Petitioner Federation in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:-
S.O. 3338.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. 101/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum-Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of City Union Bank, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
[No. L- 12011 /29/2002- IR (B - I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday , the 12th June , 2007
PRESENT: K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 101/2003
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of City Union Bank and their Workmen)
BETWEEN
I Party/Claimant
TheGeneral Secretary, AllBanks Appraisers Federation
AND
II Party/Management
The Deputy General Manager : CityUnion Bank, Kumbakonam .
Appearance:
For theClaimant
: Mr.K. Vijayarangan, Authorised Representative
For the Management : M/ s . K.Jayaraman , Advocates
AWARD
The Petitioner Federation espouses the cause of four jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent/Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years . Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of24 calendar months oftheir respective completed years of service and therefore , they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981. The Respondent/Bank is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge ofjewels . It is routine day to day business of the Respondent/Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business of the bank. The said money lending business on pledge of jewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable income to the bank on ' secured loans . Therefore, jewel appraisers in the Respondent/Bank as a regular workmen have become a requisite necessity and the services ofjewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge ofjewels . Thus it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularised as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment. They are skilled workers of the bankhaving their definite working hours. Further , the bank provides weighing raachines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment of quality and value of jewels . The Respondent/Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of jewel appraisers and they are doing clerical works with regard to raising ofjewel loans etc. and therefore, they are workmen as defined, under section 2(s) of I.D.Act . The work of jewel appraisers is not of seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable for the business of the bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment. In a similar caseofjewel appraisers of Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in I.D.No.25/1979 directing the management to regularise their service which was also upheld The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 120 11/29/2002- IR(B- I) dated 29-04-2003 has referred 9511 [ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
bythe Supreme Court . The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/Management requesting them to regularise the services of jewel appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularise their services . Hence , they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure of conciliation. Therefore, the Petitioner federations prays to pass an award to regularise the services ofjewel appraisers in the Respondent/Bank listed in the appendix.
morethan65 years . Besides appraiser work, they have other avocations and doing jobs of their own . There is no bar for them to get employment or engagement in any manner in any capacity at any place even during the continuance of his engagement as jewel appraiser with the Respondent/ Bank . Thus , their services are not exclusive for the Respondent/Bank. At any point of time there existed any relationship of employer and workmen between the Respondent and the concerned jewel appraisers . The contract as jewel appraiser is purely civil in nature and the same canbe interpreted and adjudicated only by civil courts and cannot become a subject matter of an industrial dispute. The consideration paid is purely on commission basis at the rate of 50 paise or 25 paise per hundred rupees depending upon the branch which is also paid by concerned borrower . The payment made to them are not wages . The Resportdent/Bank does not pay any amount by way of commission, or salary or wages to the jewel appraisers . The job of jewel appraisers is akin to that of professional property, valuers and the nature of work performed does not fall within the classified nature of work under section 2( s) of I.D. Act . The status ofjewel appraiser cannot be equated to that of the other employees in any manner . They are not entitled to bonus , leave or any other concession or benefit to which the regular employees wouldbe legally entitled to .The procedure for recruitment of employees do not apply to jewel appraiser. There is no age limit for his engagement as appraiser nor provision for retirement is made or agreed upon . Therefore, the question ofregularising the services of these persons does not arise atall. It is false to allege that there will be jewel loan operation on every day and that there was perennial source of income . The award passed in the Indian Bank case will not be applicable to the facts of this case . Hence, for all these reasons the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. Again, the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner's federation has got every competence to represent the jewel appraisers of Respondent/Bank who aremembers ofthe federation. It is not true to say that the employment jewel appraiser is only a contract for service and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised the controlled the work done by jewel appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the jewel appraiser has to do but also the manner in which thejewel appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent/ Bank'smanual . There is relationship of master and servant between the Respondent and the jewel appraisers in this dispute . Hence , for all these reasons , the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour.
6. In these circumstances , the points for my determination are :-
1. "Whether the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularise the services of concerned jewel appraisers in the Respondent/Bank is justified?" 4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that firstly the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not an industrial dispute as contemplated under section 2k of the I.D. Act. The Petitioner federation does not have representative capacity to represent the cause of the workers employed in the Respondent establishment. The dispute is also not espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and it does not have the support of substantial section of workmen of the establishinent nor the appraisers . The Respondent/Bank is engaged in the business of banking and they are banking company under Banking Companies Act. It has got 125 branches employing around 1400 persons . As a part oftheir banking business, the Respondent is also engaged in the business of providing loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for the banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging of Jewels . Only to ascertain the purity, value and genuineness of the jewels pledged, in certain branches the Respondent/Bank is engaging jewel appraisers . Thus , there are as many as 65 jewel appraisers engaged under the Respondent for such purpose . The manner in which the jewel appraisers do the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and it is solely left to him as the sarne depends on his skill , technique and experience. They are not liable to be transferred nor are they exposed to any disciplinary action as in the case of other workmen of the Respondent/Bank. Therefore , jewel appraisers are not workmen as contemplated under section 2(s) of the I.D. Act . The reference at the instance of Petitioner federation is bad in and incompetent . Thejewel appraisers have no fixed hours of work . Whenever there arejewel loans to be granted a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and the value ofjewels which was sought to be pledged and issue certificate. The job for single transaction may not last more than , ten minutes . On the days when there was no jewel loan transaction, they did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for nor any disciplinary action couldbe initiated against him . The jewel appraisers are free to come at any time during the working hours and appraise thejewelwhich takes around ten minutes and he could leave the establishment without any permission . In the case of Sri Ramaiah, who was engaged for Adanakottai branch already attained the age of 69 years and Sri Nallasamy who engaged for the branch at Pudukotta is already 63 years . Similarly, one Mr. Kannaiyan engaged for Risivandiyam branch is
4506 G1/07-16 9512
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 /KARTIΚΑ 26, 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 2. "To what relief the concerned jewel appraisers are entitled? "
Point No.1 :
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is 'whether the jewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by the Petitioner federation or whether the jewel appraisers arejonly independent contractors and self- styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
months and 480 days in a continuous period of24 calendar months and therefore , they are entitled tobe made as permanent employees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. It is also contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Respondent/Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the jewel appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge of jewels and the Respondent/Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore , it has become necessary that the jewel appraisers already on record should be regularised as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment. It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilled workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and placeofwork at the respective branches of the bank . Their work is not of seasonal and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a similar case with regard tojewel appraiser ofIndian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal , Chennai has passed an award in favour of the jewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979 , which was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court and also the Supreme Court and therefore, they are entitled for an award in their favour.
8. In order to substantiate their contention , on behalf of the Petitioner federation , the General Secretary of the Petitioner federation Mr. K. Vijayarangan was examined as WW 1 and he has marked jewel loan document and D I credit& Debit jewel loan card as Ex . W 1 and on behalf of the Respondent one Mr.S.Venkatesan , Chief Manager (HRMD) of the Respondent/Bank was examined as MWI and on the side of Respondent 9 documents were marked as Ex.M 1 to M9. Ex.M 1 is the extract ofjewel loan issue register of Rishivandhiyam branch , wherein one of the concerned jewel appraisers was working Ex.M2 is the abstract of jewel loan issue , register of Rishivandhiyam branch. Ex. M3 is the copy ofrecruitment policy and service conditions of Respondent/Bank. Ex.M4 is the copy of propertydeclaration form given by Mr. N. Kannaiyan , one ofthe concernedjewel appraisers . Ex.M5 , M6 and M7 are the copies of property declaration form given by S/ Sti M. Nallasamy , Mr. M.Ramaiah and . S. Rajendran respectively, the other concerned jewel appraisers in this dispute. Ex M8 is the copy of loan sanctioning letter to Sri S.Rajendran , jewel appraiser of Rishivandhiyam branch. Ex.M9 is the copy of another loan application of Mr.Rajendran to the Respondent/ Bank .
9. On behalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that jewel appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours . The apparatus , balance and other things are provided to concerned jewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard to jewel loan by thejewel appraisers . Manner of doing the work in the matter of assessing the purity, weight, value etc. has to be done as per specification , directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appraisal ofjewel value etc. done by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning ofSection 2( s) ofthe I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularisation because they have worked for more than240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar
10. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business of providing loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging of the jewels. But , it cannot be said thatjewel appraiser work is of perennial in nature. It is contended on behalf of the Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are jewel loans to be granted , a word is sent to jewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels , which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of jewel loan would be ordinarily around three to five times on a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction, the jewel appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called or any work. Further whenthe jewel appraisers are not available , no transaction will take place . They are free to come at any time during working hours and appraise the jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as the job is over he could leave the establishment, without any permission of the authorities . The manner in which the jewel appraiser does the job is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing this is solely left to him as the same depends on his skill, technique and experience . Therefore , they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions Section 2 (s ) of the I.D. Act . Leamed counsel for the 9513 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case of jewel appraisers , there is no qualification/ age . For regular employees , recruitment is to be done through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board, but in the case ofjewel appraisers, they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case of regular employees , there is fixed working hours, whereas for the jewel appraisers , there is no fixed working hours . The regular employees are paid on monthly basis , but in the case ofjewel appraisers there is no guaranteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case of jewel appraisers there is no disciplinary control . In the case of regular employees , the control/supervision is exercised not only with regard to allocation ofwork , but also the way in which the work is to be carried out, but on the other hand , in the case ofjewel appraisers, there is no control/supervision over the nature of work, to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank, whereas in the case ofjewei appraisers , charges are paid by borrowers . In the case of regular employees, there is retirement age , but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case of jewelappraiser, there is, no transfer . The regular employees , when they are in employment , they cannot carry on any other occupation, but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held thatjewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/ Bank and therefore , it set aside the judgement of Division Bench, which affirmed the Tribunal's judgement . Relying on the aforesaid decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this decision is applicable to the facts of this case and he also argued that one of the concerned jewel appraisers has obtained loan from the Respondent/Bank to carry on his goldsmith business and he has aiso applied for loan for his jewel shop business , which is evident from Ex.M8 and M9. Thus , it is cleariy established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and it is also established in this case that three out of four jewel appraisers have crossed the age of 60 years , which clearly shows that there is no age limit for their retirement and further one of the concerned jewel appraisers was recruited and appointed as jewel appraiser atthe age of33. Thus , there is no age limit for appointment ofjewel appraiser nor any limit for , the age of retirement and such is the case , they cannot be called as workman under the Respondent/ Bank and they are independent contractors and therefore , at no point of time they can ciaim regularisation.
11. I find much force in the contention of the leamed counsel for the Respondent .
Respondent further contended that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case. In the Indian Bank case , the jewel appraisers work are regular atleast for four hours, but in this case, though the Petitioner federation alleged thatjewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank , there is no iota of evidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal . On the other hand, MW 1 has clearly stated that there were not fixed period ofwork and they could come and go at any point of time and the work ofjewel appraisers have not been supervised in any nianner by the Managers of the Respondent branches . Further, in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the jewel appraisers . But , in this case, though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager, it is not established by the Petitioner federatian that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary contral over the jewel appraisers. Furthermore, in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted , but it is established in this case that the concerned jewel appraisers were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application . Most iinportant thing in the Indian Bank case is that the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which , was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case , no amount was paid by the Respondent/Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the jewel appraisers and the amount paid to jewel appraisers are only commission , which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/ Bank . Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled any relief as claimed by Petitioner federatian . He also strongly relied an the rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1520 GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK VS. WORKMEN, ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION, wherein the Supreme Court has held that" jewel appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and cannot be absorbed as part time clerical staff of Indian Overseas Bank. The reasan being , unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the jewel appraisers were directly engaged by local Manager , there were no fixed period of work and they could come and go at any point of time . The bankdid not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the jewel appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application . The amount was paid on commission basis by the loanee and not by the bank . Further , there was no qualification/ age prescribed, no retirement age , no transfer , no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation ." Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidendi in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case . Therefore , the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute . In that case, the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between the regular employees and jewel appraisers of the bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject
12. But, on the other hand , on behalf of the Petitioner , itiscontended that the issue ofjewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not 9514
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/ KARTIKA 26 , 1929
only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people as to suit arises directive policies of Central & State Governments . The time ofwork, nature of work and manner of work are under direct supervision of manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission hut it is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees , borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during 10.00 am to 2.00 pm for service and unto the disposal of the Manager of the bank . The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service . Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross examination with regard to jewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank is the same . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case.
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lotofdifferences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for , the Petitioner.
14. Then again, learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not anindustrial dispute as contemplated under section 2k of the I.D.Act . The Petitioner federation does not have representative capacity to represent the cause of workers employed in respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case of the concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein . The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone, this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limini . Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 ' II LLJ 1 NEWSPAPERS LTD. Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , U.P. & ORS 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGALLI ESTATE , VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , MADRAS 1965 1 LLI 95 NELLAI COTTION MILLS VS. LABOUR COURT, MADURAI 1962 IILLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD. Vs. LABOUR COURT, 1960 I LLJ 349 , 2004 10 SCC 460 and 2006 AIR SCW 1520 .
15. But, in this case, as I have already pointed out that since the concernedjewel appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering thisthispoint and I am not answering this point .
16. In view of the foregoing findings, I find the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularise the services of the concerned jewel appraisers is not justified.
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Point No. 2 :
The next point to be decided in this case is to what reliefthe concerned jewel appraisers are entitled?
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief. No Costs .
18. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th June , 2007) .
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined:
FortheI Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri K. Vijayarangan For the II Party/Management : MWI Sri S. Venkatesan Documents Marked:-
W1 Nil
Xerox copy of the jewel loan document & D- 1 Credit-debit J.L. card.
For the II Party/Management:---
Ml Nil
Xerox copy ofthe jewel loan issue register ofRishivandiyam Branch .
M2 Nil
Xerox copy of the monthwise abstract from the above.
M3 Nil
Xerox copy of the recruitment policy and service conditions of the Respondent/Bank .
M4 04-09-81 Xerox copy of the property declaration of Sri N. Kannaiyan .
M5 22-02-82 Xerox copy of the property declaration of Sri Nallasamy .
M6 03-10-83 Xerox copy of the property declaration of Sri M. Ramaiah .
21-03-91
M7 Xerox copy of the property declaration of Sri S. Rajendran .
M8 08-06-98 Xerox copy of the loan sanctioning letter to Sri Rajendran .
M9 23-08-00 Xerox copy of the loan application of Sri Rajendran.
9515 [भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 120 11 /30 /2002- IR(B -1) dated 29-4-2003 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The Schedule mentioned in that order is:
का.आ. 3339.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वैश्या बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सं. 103/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the demand of the All India Bank Appraisers Federation , Tamil Nadu to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers (as per Annexure) by the Vysya Bank Ltd. Bangalore is justified? If so , what relief the workmen are entitled to?" [सं. एल-12011 /30/2002 - आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the24th October, 2007
2. After the receipt of Industrial, Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as 103/2003 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively..
3. The allegations from the Claim Statement of the Petitioner arebriefly as follows:
S.O. 3339. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 103/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial- Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Vysya Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
[No. L-12011 /30/2002-IR(B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday the 12th June, 2007
PRESENT: K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer
Industrial dispute No. 103/2003
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Vysya Bank Ltd. , and their Workmen]
BETWEEN :
Petitioner
The General Secretary, All Banks Appraisers , Federation (Tamilnadu) ,
Affiliated to CITU , (Regn . No. 2863/01 CNI) No. 1 , Kattiyakkaran Street, Guddalore-607002
And
: Respondent
The Manageinent
Vysya Bank Ltd. , Head Office , Avenue Road Bangalore (Karnataka)-560 002
APPEARANCE:
Forthe Petitioner
: Union Representative
For the Management
The Petitioner federation espouses the cause of 2 JewelAppraisers of the Respondent/Bank as mentioned in the Appendix and they have entered into the services of Respondent Management and put up continuous service ranging from not less than three years and upto 20 years . Thus they have put up more than 480 days of service in a period of 24 calendar months oftheir respective completed years of service and therefore, they are each entitled to be made permanent as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. The Respondent/Bank is lending loans to agriculturists and other consumer loans on pledge of jewels . It is routine day- to-day business of the Respondent/Bank and that it has assumed a predominant role in the business of the bank. The said money lending business on pledge of jewels has also become a perennial source of income earning a good and sizeable income to the bank on secured loans. Therefore , Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank are a regular workmen, have become a requisite necessity and the services of jewel appraisers are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on pledge of jewels . Thus it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . They are skilled workers of the bank having their, definite working hours . Further , the bank provides weighing machines and other instruments for appraisal and assessment ofquality and value ofjewels . The Respondent/ Bank has got administrative control and supervision over the work of Jewel Appraisers and they are doing clerical works with regard to raising ofjewel loans etc. and therefore , they are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) of I.D Act . The work ofjewel appraisers is not seasonal in nature and it is a perennial one and it is indispensable for the business ofthe bank and it forms an integral part of the business and establishment . In a similar case of Jewel Appraisers of : M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co.
9516
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007 /KARTIKA 26, 1929
the Jewel Appraiser has to do his work as evidenced by Respondent/Bank's manual . There is relationship of master and servant between the Respondent and the Jewel Appraiser in this dispute. Hence , for all these reasons, the Petitioner federation prays for an award in their favour.
6. In these circumstances , the points for my
determination are :
"Whether the demand of the Petitioner federation to regularize the services of concerned Jewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank is justified "
Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal has passed an award in 1.D. No. 25/1979 directing the management to regularize their service which was also upheld by the Supreme Court . The Petitioner federation represented the Respondent/ Management requesting them to regularize the services of Jewel Appraisers , but no action was taken by the Respondent to regularize their services . Hence , they have raised a dispute which is referred to this Tribunal on failure ofconciliation. Therefore , the Petitioner federation prays this Tribunal to pass an award to regularize the services ofJewel Appraisers in the Respondent/Bank listed intheAppendix .
Point No. 1:
7. The crucial point to be decided in this case is whether thejewel appraisers employed in the Respondent/ Bank are workmen of the Respondent/Bank as alleged by the Petitioner federation or whether the Jewel Appraisers are only independent contractors and self- styled professionals under contract of service of the Respondent/ Bank.
8. In order to substantiate their contention, on behalf of the Petitioner federation , the General Secretary of. Petitioner federation Mr. K. Vijayarangan was examined as WWland one Karunakaran was examined as MWI on the side of the respondent and Ex.MI to M8 were marked on the side of the respondent . On the side of the petitioner, Ex. Wl to W2were niarked. Ex .Wl is the appointment of Sri A. Nagaraj Karthick as Jewel Appraiser and W2 is the conduct certificate given to himby the Manager of the Vellorebranch ofthe respondent bank . The exhibitis marked on the side of the respondents are Ex.M1 to M2 are the copy of agreements between the respondent bank and Sri S. Sivakumar and Sri Nagaraj Karthick reply Ex. M2 is the copy of statement ofparticulars given by Sri Sivakumar for his appointment as Jewel Appraiser wherein he has stated that he is the proprietor ofjewel business . Ex.M4 & M5 are the copy of the petition given by the petitioner federation before the labour authority and the reply given bythe respondent bank . Ex.M6 is the copy ofthe particulars regarding number of gold loans sanctioned from 1-1-2001 to 12-09-2003 viz . Hosur branch of the respondent bank. Ex.M7 is the copy of the details of gold loans viz. Vellore branch from 1998 to 2003. Ex.M8 is the extracts from the Manual of Instruction with regard to jewel loans .
4. In the Counter Statement, the Respondent Bank admitted that the Respondent/Bank is having its Head Office in Bangalore and having branches throughout the country including some branches in Tamil Nadu . One of the loan facility granted by the Respondent Bank is gold jewel loan. This loan is granted against pledging of gold jewels . In order to assess the value of gold , which is tendered as security, opinion of the professional expert has to be obtained just as legal opinion obtained about the title of the borrower to the property which is offered as security for the loan. The Jewel Appraisers are only professionals . The charges for the Appraiser's work is paid by the borrower . The Jewel Appraiser do not observe normal working hours of the branch . Their work is not subject to any control or supervision by the officials ofthe bank and they are not subject to any disciplinary action . There is no prohibition for the Jewel Appraiser to carry on his own profession as goldsmith . Some of the Jewel Appraisers have their own shops . Some of the Jewel Appraisers also act as Jewel Appraiser for other banks . The relationshipbetween the Bank and the Jewel Appraiser is one of Principal and Agent . One of Jewel Appraiser viz . Sri S. Sivakumar declared that he was carrying on business as goldsmith by investing a sum of Rs . 5,000 and he was the sole proprietor of his business . The Respondent Bank will not be able to provide sustained work to the Jewel Appraisers nor the volume of work turned out by them wouldjustify the payment of salary to a regular Part Time employees of the Bank . The Jewel Appraisers are not required to do any clerical work other than that of filling of the certificates . The case of Indian Bank is not relevant to this case as the facts of that case are entirely different. Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
9.Onbehalf of the Petitioner federation it is argued that Jewel Appraisers are working in the Respondent premises and they are working in the Respondent/Bank during the regular banking hours. The apparatus balance and other things are provided to concerned jewel appraiser by the Respondent/Bank and the registers were also maintained with regard tojewel loan bythe jewel appraisers . Manner of doing the work in the matter of assessing the purity, weight, value etc. has to be done as per specification, directives and circulars issued by the Respondent/Bank through its Head Office . Appraisal ofjewel value etc. done 5. Again, the Petitioner in its rejoinder alleged that the Petitioner's federation has got every competence to represent the Jewel Appraisers of Respondent/Bank who are members of the federation . It is not true to say that the employment Jewel Appraiser is only a contract for serve and not contract of service . The Respondent/Bank supervised and controlled the work done by Jewel Appraisers not only in the matter of directing what work the Jewel Appraiser has to do but also the manner in which 9517 [ भाग 1]-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
by the jewel appraisers are subject to verification or supervision of the Branch Managers of the respective branches . The pronotes , vouchers , registers and cards etc. prepared by jewel appraiser are verified by the Branch Managers who have countersigned the same and therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are workmen within the meaning of Section 2( s) ofthe I.D. Act and they are entitled to regularization because they have worked for more than 240 days continuously in a period of 12 calendar months and480 days in a continuous period of24 calendar months and therefore, they are entitled to be made as permanent einployees as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. It is also contended on behalf ofthe Petitioner that the work of jewel appraiser in the Respondent/Bank is perennial in nature because the services of the Jewel Appraiser are indispensable so far as the bank's business in granting loans on the pledge of jewels and the Respondent/Bank depends upon the jewel loans and therefore, it has become necessary that the Jewel Appraisers already on record should be regularized as permanent employees on monthly salary in each of the branches of the Respondent establishment . It is also contended that jewel appraisers are skilied workers of Respondent/Bank having their definite working hours and place ofwork at the respective branches of the bank. Their work is not of seasonal one and it is argued on behalf of the Petitioner that in a similar case with regard to Jewel Appraiserof Indian Bank, the Industrial Tribunal, Chennai has passed an award in favour ofthejewel appraiser in I.D. No. 25/1979 , which was upheld by the Division Bench of theHigh Court and also by the Supreme Court and therefore, they are entitled for an award in their favour.
and appraise the Jewel which takes around ten minutes and as soon as the job is over he could leave the establishment without any permission of the authorities . The manner in which the jewel appraiser does thejob is not liable to be supervised or controlled and the manner of doing the same is solely left to him as the same depends on hisskill technique and experience. Therefore, they are not workmen as contemplated under provisions of Section 2(s) ofthe I.D. Act. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts of this case . In the Indian Bank case, the Jewel Appraisers work are regular atleast for four hours , but in this case, though the Petitioner federation alleged that jewel appraisers are working during the working hours of the bank, there is not even an iota ofevidence to establish this fact before this Tribunal . On the other hand, MWI has clearly statedthat there were not fixed period ofwork and they could come and go at any point of time and the work of Jewel Appraisers have not been supervised in any manner by the Managers of the Respondent branches . Further, in Indian Bank case , it is established that the bank has disciplinary control over the Jewel Appraisers . But, in this case, though it is alleged by the Petitioner union that disciplinary control was with the Branch Manager, it is not established by the Petitioner federation that the Branch Manager has exercised disciplinary control over the Jewel Appraisers . Furthermore , in the Indian Bank case , conditions were to be fulfilled before any leave was granted, butit is established in this case that the concerned jewel appraisers were not required to sign attendance register and also they were not required to make any leave application . Most important thing in the Indian Bank case isthat the jewel appraisers were paid minimum amount per month which was some what akin to the salary, but in the present case, no amount was paid by the Respondent/ Bank neither as commission nor as wages to the Jewel Appraisers andthe amount paid to Jewel Appraisers , are only commission, which was paid by the loanee and not by the Respondent/Bank. Therefore, the concerned jewel appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and they are not entitled to any reiief as claimed by the Petitioner federation . He also strongly relied on the rulings reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1520 GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Vs. WORKMEN, ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION , wherein the Supreme Court has held that " Jewel Appraisers for loans cannot be treated as workers and canot be absorbed as part time clerical staff of Indian Overseas Bank. The reason being unlike regular employees appointed by bank, the JewelAppraisers were directly engaged by local Manager , there were no fixed period of work, and they could come and go at any point of time . The bank did not exercise and disciplinary control on them and the Jewel Appraisers are not required to sign attendance register and also were not required to make any leave application. The amount was paid on commission basis by the loanee and not by the 10. But, as against this , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that no doubt as part of their banking business , the Respondent is engaged in the business ofproviding loans mostly to agriculturists which is a priority sector for banking industry as declared by Government of India and to others on similar scale solely based on the pledging ofjewels . But, it cannot be said that jewel appraiserwork is ofperennial in nature. It is contended onbehalf ofthe Respondent that there is no fixed hours of work for the jewel appraisers . Whenever there are Jewel loans to be granted , a word is sent tojewel appraisers who reside nearby and appraise the quality, purity and value of jewels , which was sought to be pledged and issue a certificate and the job of single transaction may not last more than ten minutes . Such transactions of Jewel loan wouldbe ordinarily around three to five times a day and on certain days there may not be any transaction at all and when there was no jewel loan transaction , the Jewel Appraisers did not come to the establishment at all nor was he called for any work . Further, when the jewel appraisers are not available , no transaction will take place. They are free to come at any time during working hours [PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 9518
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/ KARTIΚΑ 26, 1929
12.But, on the other hand , on behalf of the petitioner, it is again contended that, the issue of jewel loan to agriculturists is perennial and commercial work of the bank and it is not only profit motivated but also to improve the conditions of agriculturist and standard of people so as to suit arises directive policies ofCentral & State Governments . The time ofwork , nature of work and manner of work are under direct supervision of Manager of respective branches . Though the nomenclature of the remuneration paid to the appraiser is named as commission but it is being paid only through the bank, though it might be collected by the bank from loanees , borrowers . The appraisers are available in the bank during the banking hours for service and to the disposal of the Manager of the bank. The service between the management and workers of service is only a contract of service and not a contract for service . Even the Respondent witness has conceded in his cross -examination with regard to jewel appraisal work done by the Indian Bank appraisers and also the jewel appraisers of the Respondent/Bank is the same . Under such circumstances , it cannot be said that the Indian Bank's case is not applicable to the facts ofthis case.
13. But as I have already pointed out that there are lot ofdifferences between the Indian Bank's case and also the present case and as such , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the representative for the Petitioner.
14. Then again, learned counsel for the Respondent contended that the dispute referred to this Tribunal is not an industrial dispute as contemplated under Section 2k of the I.D. Act . The Petitioner Federation does not have the representative capacity to represent the case of workers employed in Respondent establishment . Neither the Petitioner nor General Secretary has locus standi or competency either to represent the case ofthe concerned jewel appraisers in the establishment or to file any statement and to sign therein . The dispute has not been espoused properly so as to construe that the dispute is an industrial dispute and the dispute does not have the support of substantial section of the workers of establishment nor the appraisers and on this ground alone , this dispute deserves to be dismissed in limine Learned counsel for the Respondent further relied on the rulings reported in 1957 II LLP 1 NEWSPAPERS LTD . Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , U.P. & ORS . 1964 II LLJ 164 MURUGALLI ESTATE, VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, MADRAS 1965 I LLP 95 NELLAI COTTON MILLS VS. LABOUR COURT, MADURAI 1962 II LLJ 93 VISALAKSHMI MILLS LTD. Vs. LABOUR COURT, 19601 LLJ349,2004 10 SCC 460 and 2006 AIR SCW 1520.
15. But, in this case , as I have already pointed out that since the concerned Jewel Appraisers are not workmen under Respondent/Bank, I am not considering this point and I am not answering this point.
bank. Further , there was no qualification/age prescribed , no retirement age , no transfer, no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation . " Relying on this decision , learned counsel for the Respondent argued that the ratio dissidenti in this case is fully applicable to the facts of this case . Therefore, the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this dispute. In that case , the Supreme Court has clearly distinguished the facts between the regular employees and Jewel Appraisers of the bank, wherein it has observed that regular employees are subject to qualification and age prescribed whereas , in the case of Jewel Appraisers , there is no qualification/ age. For regular employees , recruitment is to be done through Employment Exchange/Banking Service Recruitment Board, but in this case of Jewel Appraisers , they are directly engaged by local Managers and in the case ofregular employees , there is fixed working hours , whereas for the Jewel Appraisers , there is no fixed working hours. The regular employees are paid on monthly basis, but in the case of Jewel Appraisers there is no guararteed payment and only commission is paid that too by the loanees . The regular employees are subject to disciplinary control whereas in the case of Jewel Appraisers there is no disciplinary control . In the case of regular employees , the control/supervision is exercised not only with regard to allocation of work, but also the way in which the work is to be carried out , but on the other hand, in the case of Jewel Appraisers , there is no control/supervision over the nature of work to be performed by them . With regard to regular employees wages are paid by the bank, whereas in the case of Jewel Appraisers , charges are paid by borrowers . In the case of regular employees , there is retirement age , but for the jewel appraisers there is no retirement age . The regular employees are subject to transfer and in the case of Jewel Appraiser, there is no transfer. The regular employees , when they are in employment , they cannot carry on any other occupation , but for the jewel appraisers there is no bar to carry on any avocation or occupation and after considering all these things , the Supreme Court has held that Jewel Appraisers are not employees of the Respondent/Bank and therefore , it set aside the judgment of Division Bench , which affirmed the Tribunal's judgment . Relying on the aforesaid decisions , the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that this decision is applicable to the facts of this case and he also argued that one of the concerned Jewel Appraisers has admitted that he is the proprietor of jewel shop which is evident from Ex.M2 . Thus , it is clearly established that there is no bar to carry on his own business or occupation and it is also established in this case that there is no age limit for appointment of jewel appraiser nor any limit for the age of retirement and such is the case , they cannot be called as workman under the Responden/bank and they are independent contractors artd therefore , at no point of time they can claim regularization.
16. In view of the foregoing findings , I find the demand of the Petitioner Federation to regularize the 11. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent .
9519
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
services of the concerned jewel appraisers is not justified.
Point No. 2 :
The next point to be decided in this case is to what reliefthe concerned jewel appraisers are entitled ?
17. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned jewel appraisers are not entitled to any relief, No costs .
18. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this day the 12th June , 2007)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined:
Forthe 1 Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri Vijayarangan For the II Party/Management : MW1 Sri M. Karunakaran Documents Marked:
Ex.No. Date
Description
WI
17-07-1981 Appointment.
W2
29-08-1997 Conduct Certificate For the 11 Party/Management:-
Date
Ex. No.
Description
MI
10-01-1996 Agreement between the II Party and Sri Sivakumar .
12-09-1994
M2 Statement of Particulars furnished by S. Sivakumar for the appointment as Jewel Appraisers .
M3
24-01-1980 Agreement between the II Party and Sri Nagarajakannaiah.
M4
Nil
Petition filed by the I Party before the ALC .
M5
23-02-2002 Reply filed by the II Party beforeALC .
12-09-2003
M6 Mail from Hosur Branch to HeadOffice - Regarding no . of Gold Loans sanctioned from 1-1-2001 to 12-9-2003 .
17-09-2003
M7 Mailfrom Branch Manager , Vellore to Head Office , regarding yearwise details of Gold Loans from 1998 to 2003 .
M8 Nil Relevant extract of Manual of Instructions Advances against Gold Ornaments .
4506 G1/ 07
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर 2007
का.आ. 3340.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 09/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/441/2000- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th October, 2007 S.O. 3340 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/ 2001) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the managernent of State Bank of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on24-10-2007 .
[No. L- 12012/441 /2000 -IR(B -1 )] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO. II AT MUMBAI PRESENT :
A. A. LAD, PRESIDING OFFICER REFERENCE No. CGIT- 2/9 OF 2001
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF STATE BANK OF INDIA
...First Party StatBank Bhavan, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai -400021 . And
Their Workman , Shri M.N. Jivanani , ...Second Party APPEARANCE :
M/s . Bhave & Co. , Advocates Mrs. Meena Doshi , Advocate
FortheEmployer : For the Workman :
Date of reserving Award : 1st June , 2007 Date ofPassing ofAward: 31st August, 2007 .
AWARD
The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :
The reference is sent to this Tribunal by the Under Secretary ofCentral Government, the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour by its Order No. L- 12012/441 /2000 /IR/ (B- I)dated 11th January , 2001 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Clause ( d) of sub -section ( 1) and sub -section 2( A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to decide :
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India by dismissing Shri M. N. Jivanani from the services of State Bank of India is justified and proper ? If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to ?
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 9520
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007 / KARTIKA 26 , 1929
9. By letter dated 22nd July, 1997 and 12th February, 1998 Bank intimated 2nd Party that , it cannot accept the request made by him or by Union and informed that , it cannot take 2nd Party in the employment and consider him for the reliefs .
2. To support the subject- matter involved in the reference , 2nd Party filed Statement of Claim at Exhibit 7 stating and contending that , the concerned workman M.N. Jivanani joined 1st Party as a Cashier- cum- Clerk and worked there since 5th August, 1982. Initially he worked at Kamathe Branch and thereafter posted at SBI , Best Depot, Kurla Branch .He is resident of Ulhasnagar. He applied to Branch Manager, Kurla Depot . Branch, Mumbai , by application dated 8th April, 1993 for issuance of certificate of Income- tax in order to enable him to apply for visa to visit Japan and also applied for sanctioned leave. Said certificate was issued the Branch Manager on 10th April , 1993 and one week's leave was granted in April , 1993 to enable him to visit Japan where his brother was residing .
3. While he was at Japan , unfortunately he fell sick with serious chest pain , cold and fever . Doctor advised him not to travel by Air . His brother also advised him like that. He was constrainedto stay at Japan . Thereafter he suffered serious backache .
4. 2nd Party vide his letter dated 12th July, 1993 and 12thOctober , 1993 requested Bank to sanction him leave on the ground of ill health . He also sent Doctor's certificate dated 12th July, 1993 and in October , 1993. Both those applications were sent from his brother's address at Japan .
10. On 27th December, 1999 by letter addressedto Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) , Union sought intervention of Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) inthe dispute of the 2nd Party Workman . However , failure report was submitted by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) as he was unable to resolve the dispute, by which 2nd Party pray to reinstate him with benefit of back wages and continuity of service stating that no opportunity was given to him to explain his absenteeism . It was also stated that no enquiry was conducted, no proper procedure was followed . It is contended that the decision taken by the Ist Party was bias and not taken as per law. The termination dated 24th May, 1997 is not legal and maintainable. In fact 2nd Party Workman should have been awarded opportunity to explain his absenteeism and the Bank authorities ought to have considered the difficulties which he faced . So it is submitted that , Reference be allowed with directions to the Bank to reinstate him and to give him back wages and continuity of service.
10A. This Statement of Claim is opposed by the Ist Party by filing reply at Exhibit 11 making out the case that, in terms of the application made by the 2nd Party and written test heldby it the 2nd Party was offered the employment with the 1st Party as a Cashier- cum- Clerk with the Ist Party. It is also admitted by the Ist Party that, the 2nd Party joined the services of the 1st Party on 5th August , 1982 and was posted at various places as mentioned in the Statement of Claim .
5. On 13th December, 1993 by letter addressed to Branch Manager , he requested him to sanction sick leave from 13th December, 1993 saying he was still suffering from ill health . He also informed the Bank authorities that, since the Doctor did not know English language the certificates were sent in Japanese language and requested for grant of sick leave on the basis of the said certificates and the Bank authorities acknowledged the same. He by further letter dated 13th February, 1994 sent with Medical Certificate of Japan Doctor and requested to continue it .
6. By letter dated 24th May, 1994 issued by the Assistant General Manager ( III ) addressed to 2nd Party at his residential address of Ulhasnagar, he was informed that, since he has not reported for work as asked to report within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the notice dated 5th March , 1994 it was deemed that , he has "voluntarily retired " , from the services on 5th April , 1994 . By the said letter he was also asked to pay within 15 days , from the date ofthe receipt of the said notices , one month's pay and allowances in lieu of notice failing which it will be recovered from him .
11. It is contended by the Ist Party that , in April , 1993 2nd Party Workman applied to the Bank for issue of Income -tax clearance certificate for the purpose of obtaining visa to visit Japan . In fact , as per service rules, employees or Workmen who is to proceed to country outside India for any reason , other than his official duty, ought to have obtain prior permission in that behalf from the Bank. Additionally it was expected from the employees to apply for leave on the ground that he want to visit foreign country and said employee has to give undertaking that he will not accept any employment in the foreign country and shall not extend stay in the foreign country behind the period of sanctioned leave and return to India on the expiry of the said leave . However , this Workman did not give any such undertaking to the Bank nor intimated about his position at Japan .
7. 2nd Party states that 3 notices were sent ot him at his Ulhasnagar address which were returned "unaccepted" . Then termination of services of 2nd Party was communicated to him by letter dated 24th May, 1994 . By letter dated 9th May, 1997 2nd Party Workman made an appeal to the Bank authorities to reinstate him with benefits of continuity of service and back wages .
8. Thereafter, the said request was also made by Union through its General Secretary requesting the Bank authorities to reconsider the decision and take him in the employment.
12. 2nd Party did apply for leave on 23rd April , 1993 and 7th May, 1993 on account of visit to Japan which was granted by the Bank . Thereafter he did not sought any permission and that too for sick leave from 10th May , 1993 to 19th May , 1993 followed by another application dated 20-5-1993 and 18th June, 1993 , however, those were granted by the Bank. However , thereafter concerned Workman 9521 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26, 1929
[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
15.. In view of the above pleadings my Ld . Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 12 which I answer as follows:
ISSUES
FINDINGS
NO.
1. Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India by dismissing Shri M.N. Jivanani from the services of the State Bank of India is just , legal and proper?
2. What relief Shri Jivanani is entitled to?
2ndParty is entitled to reinstatement without back wages but with continuity ofservice for retire- ment benefits .
REASONS :
neglected to resume on duty on the expiry of the said leave which was sanctioned upto 19th June, 1993. The reasonable time was given to the 2nd Party to report on dutyby notices but the 2nd Party did not report for duty. Then by letter dated 20th June, 1993 2nd Party requested to extend leave on the ground of sickness . Bank received it on 20th August, 1993 alongwith some documents in Japanese language . However , said letter did not accompany any authenticated translation of the contents of the said documents in English which was expected to be complied with by the concerned workman . Then the Bank sent a telegram dated 8th October , 1993 disapproving his action. However, 2nd Party did not take any steps on it. Thenby letter dated 12th October , 1993 said workman sought for further extension of leave on medical grounds with medical certificate in Japanese language . On 1st November, 1993 Bank informed the concerned workman that, application for extension of leave is not allowed and he was asked to report on duty long back but he failed to do so . In these circumstances the Bank presumed that, concerned workman is not interested to resume on duty. Said decision was communicated by the Bank to the concerned workman by registered post treating he voluntarily retired.
13. According to Bank , the concerned workman failed and neglected to report on duty as intimated by the Bank. Even leaves prayed by him were not sanctionedby the Bank though letter dated 12th October , 1993 , 13-12-1993 and letter without date were received by the Bank on 09th March , 1994. Even by letter dated 2nd February, 1994 addressed to the workman at Japan address 1stPartydirected him to report on duty , till said workman did not take note of it and report on duty. Said workman did not report on duties inspite of the call of the Bank . By letter dated 24th may, 1994, addressed to the concerned workman at his Ulhasnagar address , Bank informed the 2nd Party that, since he did not report on duty his services have beentreated as deemed to have , "voluntarily retired."
16. 2nd Party workman worked with 1st Party as a Cashier-cum-Clerk. He joined 1st Party on 5th August, 1982. When he was at BEST Depot Branch at Kurla, he applied for leave on 8th April , 1993 on account to visit Japan and prayer of the 2nd Party workman to visit Japan was granted by the Bank . Accordingly, he proceeded to Japan during April, 1993. That time one week's leave was granted in April, 1993 to enable 2nd Party to visit Japan . However, after going there , he fell sick and did not report on duty . On a number of occasions he sent correspondence to the 1st Party and requested them to extend the leave and lastly he requested them to turn down its decision by which they informed that , 2nd Party was treated as deemed to have "voluntarily retired" . According to 2nd Party said decision treating him as deemed, "voluntarily retired " is nothing but terminating his services to lead him the risky life . As a result of that , his services came to an end and by that he looses his income. Said decision is drastic. It was not taken by following due process of law . No charge sheet was served. No enquiry was conducted. No opportunity was given to explain the 2nd Party about his absenteeism . So it is prayed that , the decision taken by the 1st Party treating him as ' voluntarily retired' requires to be set aside with the directions to the Ist Party to take him in the employment with benefit of back wages and continuity of services .
14. As per Bipartite Settlement Bank can treat the employee as having " voluntarily ceased" his services from the employment of the Bank inter alia of the concerned workman ifhe proceeds to foreign country without leave or over stays his sanctioned leave by 150 days . Thus it is presumed that, 2nd Party remained absent for more than 150 days by said Bipartite settlement, it empowers the Bank to take decision about the concerned workman as having, " voluntarily retired" from its employment. Even the appeal filed by the concerned workman was turned downby the Appellate authority and now nothing remains in the prayer ofthe concerned workman to consider. So it isprayed that , dispute raised by the concerned workman about the decision taken by the 1st Party treating him as deerned to have been, " voluntarily retired " does not require to reconsider as prayed by the 2nd Party workman and to take him in the employment with benefits of back wages and continuity of service.
17. As stated above , it is disputed by the 1st Party saying that, though leave was sanctioned and though permission was given to the concerned workman to visit Japan, he extended that leave and remained at Japan on unauthorized absenteeism for years together . No separate applications were given by him in advance . He did not apply in time for extension of leave. Though he was warned to report on duty, he failed to report on duty. Such a long absenteeism from duty does not permit 1st Party to keep 2nd Party in the employment and accordingly it intimated tothe 2nd Party that, it treated his absenteeism as deemed "voluntarily retired" by letter dated 24th May, 1997. 4506(G1/07-18 9522
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
18. To prove that, 2nd Party placed reliance on his affidavit filed at Exhibit 25 in lieu of the examination in chief. Whereas 1st Party filed an affidavit of its officer at Exhibit 31 in lieu ofthe examination - in-chief.
leveled against the 2nd Party workman for which 1st Party has taken decision treating him as deemed "voluntarily retired" from employment . It is also a matter ofrecord that, saidvoluntary retirement is nothing but bringing to an end tothe services of this type of employee since he is not getting any benefits by virtue of the said deemed, "voluntary retirement" or any other benefits.
22. 2nd Party workman tried to make out the case that, he fell sick after going to Japan . He tried to produce some documents which are in Japanese language . it is a matter ofrecord that, those ' so called' medical certificates in Japanese language are not yet translated to know what it contains and what was cause for which 2nd Party was declared sick. It is also a matter ofrecord that, neither 1st Party nor 2nd Party chased each other on this point and decision was taken by 1st Party which was ex- parte and wascommunicated by sending letter dated 24th May, 1994 tothe 2nd Party by which it informed the 2nd Party about his services are treated as "voluntarily retired".
23. When there was no enquiry by giving charge sheet, it also made it clear that, opportunity was not given totheconcerned workman to explain about his absenteeism or itmay be that due to distance between the 1st Party and the stay of 2nd Party during that period it might have created thisproblem . At the same time , one cannot ignore the fact that, the 2nd Party returned to India after 3 years and 9 months though the decision was taken by the 1st Party on 24th May, 1994 to treating him as deemed voluntarily retired. All this reveals that, no charge sheet was served on 2nd Party .It also reveals that the only allegation against the 2nd party was about his absenteeism. It also reveals that, no proper opportunity was given to the 2nd Party to explain about his absenteeism as stated above, mere allegation of absenteeism is leveled against 2ndpartyworkman while treating him as voluntarily retired from the services.
19. In the affidavit 2nd Party reproduced all above events sequences wise . In the cross he states that, he was in Japan from 24th May, 1993 to 25th February, 1997. He admits that, initially leave for one week was granted by theBank. he admits that, he did not consult any specialist Doctor at Japan. He also admits that, he do not know Japanese language . He admits that, he received letters dated5-3-1994 and 24-5-1994 from the Bank. He admits the address given at Exhibit 17. He admits that , he did not inform about his absenteeism during three years and nine months of his stay at Japan . He states that , he was not getting any service in Japan and was depending on his brother. He further admits that, leave granted by the Bank expired on 19th June, 1993. He admits that he did not apply to the Bank for further extension of leave . He admits that, he has no documentary evidence to show that, he sent letters for extension of leave from 10th May , 1993 to 19th May, 1993 and application dated 12th July , 1993. He also admits that, he does not know name of the Doctor from whom he took treatment and certificate . He also admits that, he does not possess any case papers about his ailment, that he does not possess any prescriptions given by the Doctor . Even he does not possess the X- rays and its reports and have no evidence to show , what treatment was given to him at Japan. He states that, he was suffering from back pain , cold, fever and chest pain . According to him that, pain was of a very serious nature . However, no X-ray was taken of that. He is also unable to state how much expenses were incurred for his medical treatment at Japan during his stay of 3 years and 9 months . He states that, he returned to Bombay on 25th February, 1997. The admits that he got letter of the Bank sometime in June , 1994 of 24th May, 1994. He states that , he was shocked bythe said letter. Then he filed pursis at Exhibit 26. Against thatBank filed an affidavit of its officer at Exhibit 31 in lieu ofthe examination- in- chief to deny all the contentions of the concerned workman . This witness also admits that, 2ndParty proceeded to Japan after sanction of leave .
20. Heardboth. Perused the proceedings .
24. In this scenario if we consider grievance made by 2nd Party that, opportunity was not given and he was not served with charge sheet about his absenteeism without permission , I think it requires to consider . It is a matter of record that, from number of record it reveals number of correspondence was made by the 2nd Party by which he requested to extend his leave, though the applications are not touching the previous dates and taking reference ofthe previous correspondence . One has to note that, charge sheet was not served and specific allegations of absenteeism were not leveled against the concerned workman. It may be that, 2nd Party may have returned to India on 24th February, 1997 it does not mean that, he cannot raise dispute about the cause behind his termination or he cannot raise dispute about decision taken by the 1st Party ? Though there is a delay one has to consider , whether sincere efforts were made by the concerned workman to achieve the employment ? It is also an admitted fact that, number of correspondence were sentby him and they are admitted by the First Party, Even in the Written Statement 1st Party has admitted that , 21. Now, it becomes the matter of record that, the concerned workman was employed with the 1st Party, who joined 1st Party w.e.f. 5th August, 1982 as a Cashier-cum- Clerkand served with it upto April , 1993 i.e. he served for 11 years continuously with the Bank when he was in India. It is also amatter ofrecord that, after proceeding to Japan, he didnot return to India till 25th February, 1997. That means hewas in Japan from April, 1994 to 25th February, 1997 i.e. for3 years and 9 months . It is also a matter ofrecord that, no enquirywas conducted. it is also a matter of record that, no charge sheet was served on 2nd Party workman . It is also a matter of record that , no opportunity was given to the 2nd Party to explain about his absenteeism. It is also a matter of record that, except absenteeism no other grave charges are 9523 [भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17, 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
and that is his explanation as to why he did not report on duty and did not apply with the order of the 1st Party which asked the 2nd Party to report on duty within 30 days.Accordingly to me stay of 2nd Party in Japan for 3 years and 9 months is more than sufficient to consider that , he had reason to stay away from the employment . If at all , he might have been served with the charge sheet he might have got an opportunity to put these facts before the Inquiry Officer who was supposed to consider it as there was reason for 2nd Party to stay away from thejob.
26. The Ld . Advocate for the Union filed citations published in 1987 LAB .I.C . page 218 (Kamal Kishore Lakshman vs. M/ s Pan American World Airways Inc. and ors .) ofApex Court in Civil Appeal No. 2568 of 1986. Said citation is on the point of decision taken by the employer on account of loss of confidence . When such a ground is taken by the employer in that case and in the caseofloss ofconfidence it became stigma and to allege that, employer has lost the confidence, enquiry is a must . However, in the instant case which is at hand , no such conclusion was made by thelst party i.e. Bank alleging the loss of confidence. The letter dated 24th May, 1994 on which dispute is raised by the 2nd Party reveals that , ist Partytreated 2nd party as deemed voluntarily retired from services observing that, he failed to report on duty as directed . So in my view, the citation referred by the 2nd Party'sAdvocate on this points when is on different point does not inviteto consider in the present case . Another citation published in 1973 SC page 122(Vol.60) C 1272 in CivilAppeal No. 1461 of 1972 where points ofjurisdiction under Section 11 (A) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 of Tribunal is considered to interfere with the dismissal order given by the employer to the employee . I think Section 11 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is very much clear on that point which does not require any support and there cannot be quarrel about the jurisdiction of the Court. So I do not wish to burden the judgment by reproducing the facts of the case referred in the citation . At the same time 1st Party's Advocate also placed his hands on the citation published in 2005 III CLR page 120 of our Hon'ble High Court given in ( Ramaswamy Murugesjh vs S. G. Bhonsale) case where , our Hon'ble High Court observed that , if Workman suffers from continuous ill health and in that facts and circumstances ofthe case, ifthe decision of termination is taken , it does not amount to the termination under Section 2(00) ofsub- clause (c) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 which cannot be legal . He also referred another citation published in 2006 II CLR page 1019 (State of H. P. & Ors vs. Presiding Judge and Anr. ) of Himachal Pradesh High Court where it was observed that , absenteeism is nothing but abandonment of job and so it be treated as voluntarily retirement . In that case it is oberved that such a termination does not amount to retrenchment with in Section 2 (00) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 where Section 25 (F) is also attracted .
number of letters were written by the 2nd Partybut those were not touching with the previous letters and dates of previous correspondence. Even 1st Party acted upon some letters and sanctioned him leave , even after one week which was initially granted . In para 6 of the Written Statement 1st Party stated that , the said Workman applied for his Earned Leave between 23rd April, 1993 and 7th May, 1993 to visit Japan was granted by the Bank. It is also statedby 1st Partythat, he sought sick leave from 10th May, 1993 to 19th May, 1993 followed by another letter for granting earned leave between 20th May , 1993 and 18th June, 1993 whichwas also granted by the Bank . It is the allegation of the 1st party that, he neglected to resume on duty on 19th June, 1993 on the expiry of his leave which was rejected by the Bank. It is also pertinent to note that, when leave was granted upto 18th June , 1993 , how one can attend India to report on duty on the next date i.e. on 19th June, 1993 as expected by the Bank from Japan? At the same time it is not expected by the Bank as to how 2nd Party was supposed to report on post within 15 days ? Even in para9 of the written statement 1st Party has stated that, by letter dated 12th October , 1993 , 2nd Party prayed for extension of leave. Said application was accompanied by medical certificate in Japanese language . It is stated that, since previous letter which was also containing such typeofJapanese language certificate it was not translated in English and Bank did not accept it and by letter dated 1-11-1993 Bank informs that, his application for extension . of leave was not allowed and then Bank concluded that, he neglected to report on duty . Even Officer of the Bank has stated that, by letter dated2-2-1994 addressed to 2nd Party at Japan address Bank. requested him to report on duty immediately . However , Workman did not report on duty though he was served with it . Even Bank referredto theappeal preferred by the 2nd Party dated 9th May, 1997 which was rejected by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 12-2-1998 . So all this reveals that, attempts were made by 2nd Party but it is to be noted that, those were not attempt in continuation of previous correspondence and referring previous dates and giving response to the correspondence of the 1st Party. All these things reveals that, no charge sheet was served . No explanation was sought from the 2nd Party and first party concluded to treat his absenteeism as deemed voluntry retirement. No doubt2nd Party remained absent for more than 3 years 9 months continuously. some argument is tried to be made that , while visiting Japan or while visiting out of India employee has to seek permission. But when leave was sanctioned and which was extended from time to time as stated above , in my considered view, no hurdle will come in the way of the 2nd Party Workman to visit foreign country was without prior permission of the Bank. Here 1st Party has made capital ofabsenteeism of2nd Party for more than 150 days and so it decided to treat his absenteeism as deemed voluntarily retired . According to me, now facts are clear . As stated above, 2nd Party remained inJapan for 3 years and 9 months and returned to India on 25-2-1997. When he was in Japan for 3 years and 9 months
27. However, in both cases (Supra) , workmen were sick . In case ofRamaswamy Murugesjh he was declaredby 9524
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/ KARTIKA 26, 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
this stage since he fought continuously for his right to work which I feel has substance . So I conclude that the decision taken by the 1 st party and treating him as voluntarily retired is not just, legal and proper . So Answer this issue to that effect .
ISSUE . NO . 2
Doctors unfit to work and so termination was given on that ground to Ramaswamy- Murugesjh. But in this it is not termination on solely sickness but on absenteeism whereas in the case ofHimachal Pradesh i.e. second citation workman was appointed temporarily. Then she was transferred and then she reported on duty and she was not permitted to join and her services stood terminated as she cannot be taken back with approval of the higher authorities though there was a decision of the Court to take her in the employment about his previous termination . Since facts of both the cases are different and termination in both the cases (Supra) were on different footing, in my considered view , those cases and law laid down by respective Courts cannot be made applicable in the instant case which is in hand since in the present case on simple absenteeism and same ground was taken by the 1st Party to treat the concerned workmen as deemed ' voluntary retired' .
29. Now, 2nd Party prays for reinstatement with benefits of continuity of service with back wages . We know State Bank of India is a public undertaking where money transaction is done by citizens or India. It is run on public money. It is amatter of fact that, 2nd Party was in Japan for 3 years and 9 months i.e. from April, 1993 , and then did not work till this moment i.e. till end ofAugust, 2007 with first party that means he remained out of job for round about fourteenyears and did not work with the 1st Party. When he did not work with 1st Party for 14 years, it will not be proper , legal and even practicable to direct ist Party to pay him wages for that period . At the same time one cannot ignore that he was out of India. One cannot ignore that, he was in touch with the 1st Party and that fact is admitted by the 1st Partyalso. It is a matter offact that inquiry was not conducted though he returned to India. His prayer was to take him in the employment. In fact Management ought to have given him an opportunity to explain and heard him as to why he wasunable to report on duty. It is a matter ofrecord that, he was in Japan for three years and nine months from April, 1993 to 25th February, 1997. When he was out of India. It was not possible for one to fact enquiry if at all it could have been initiated by the 1st Party. But it was possible for the 1st Party to initiate enquiry after he returned to Inida but it was not done. At the same time one cannot ignore that, he did not work for the Ist Party for about 14years.
30. When this is the situation, when no other charges are levelled against the 2nd Party except his absenteeism andwhen no enquiry was conducted and no opportunity was afforded and no opportunity was given to the 2nd Party to explain his absenteeism, in my considered view, hemust be reinstated, without back wages, with continuity of services for retirement benefits . It is not the case of the 1stParty that, he has some source of income or he is of the retirement age . So in my considered view, he must be permitted to work till the date of his superannuation in the Bank and he must be benefited with contunuity of services for retirement benefits, since initially he worked from 1982 without any stigma till 1993 .
1
31. In Veiw of the discussions above I conclude that reference should be party allowed. Hence , the order:
ORDER
(a) Reference is party allowed;
(b) 1st Party to reinstate 2nd Party Shri M.N. Jivunani onhis post from where he was asked to voluntarily retire, with continuity of service to claim retirement benefits ;
(c) prayer of2nd Party to give back wages is rejected; (d) there is no order as to its costs ;
Mumbai,
31st August, 2007
A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer 28. While declaring 2nd Party deemed voluntarily retired no opportunity was given as stated above . He unable to put up his case as to why he did not report on duty. It is a matter of fact that, leave of 2nd Party was granted bythe 1st Party as stated in the Written Statement . Initially on 23rd April , 1993 and 7th May, 1993 then his leave application sanctioned was granted on 10th May , 1993 and 19th May, 1993 then he prayed for extension of leave which was to expire on 19th June , 1993 , 1st Party received another application dated 28-8-1993 alongwith alleged documents in Japanese language. Then it is a matter of record that 2nd Party addressed a letter to the Bank dated 12-10-1993 . So this correspondence was going on from the 2nd Party's side and it is admitted to the 1st Party also . So lastly Bank asked 2nd Party to report on duty by addressing letter dated 5th March , 1994 to his Ulhasnagar address asking his report on duty with explanation. It is a matter of record that he was in Japan at that time still that letter was written to him at Ulhasnagar by which he was asked to report on duty with explanation. Thereafter by letter dated 24th May, 1994 the Bank presumed he has already retired . So all this reveals that , before reporting in India on 25th February , 1997 he was unable to contact 1st Party. Till that moment, he was unable toget any opportunity to explain his absenteeism . Though he raised dispute though Union after long time but Bank did not consider it and the matter went before the Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Mumbai , who submitted its failure report and then came to this Tribunal as a matter of Reference. So all this reveals that , 2nd Party did not get an opportunity to put up his case as to why he was absent and here it is to be noted that, only absenteeism is the cause behind taking decision of treating him as deemed voluntrily retired. As we know " voluntarily retired " is nothing but sort of termination which brings end to the employment . Here 2nd Party was working with 1st Party from 1982 til 1993 without any problem . Then from April , 1993 till he returned back to India on 25th February, 1997 i.e. for 7 years and 9 months he was out of employment and that absenteeism is the only draw back of the concerned Workman who is involved in the reference . Šo in this situation I feel it is necessary to consider his case atleast af 9525 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Mumbai , dated 27th September , 2007.
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
Award Part-I
Matrix of the facts as culled out from the reference are as under :-
का.आ. 3341.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार लाईफ इंशोरेंस कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/2005) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
1. The Government ofIndia, Ministry ofLabour, by its Order No. L- 17012/25/2004 IR (B-I) dated 29-12-2004in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-
[सं. एल-17012/25/2004- आई आर (बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 24th October , 2007
"Whether the action of the management Life Insurance Corporation of India, MDO- II , Mumbai byremoval from the services ofShri M. L. Manikade, IIGA, w.e.f. 30-12-1997 is justified? Ifnot, what relief Shri M. L. Manikade is entitled to ? "
S.O. 3341. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2 , Mumbai, as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007.
2. Claim statement is filed by the General Secretary, Insurance Employees Union , filed at Ex- 5 making out case that, LIC is subdivided into seven zones for the purpose of administrative convenience , consisting of 21 Divisional Offices.
[No. L- 17012/25/2004- IR(B- 1 )] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
3. The workman involved in the reference namely Manikade was firstly appointed in the Corporation as an Assistant in the Class III cadre in 1990. Then he was promoted as an Higher Grade Assistant.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT
A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/41 OF 2005
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA
TheSenior Divisional Manager ,
4. Said second party workman had written letter on 10-4-97 about sickness ofhis mother and applied leave for the same w.e.f. 7-4-97. Even he sent telegram on 24-4-1997 referring sickness of mother and requested to grant leave from 7-4-1997 . Chembur Branch office granted P. L. to the concernedworkman . Even he was permitted to draw salary ofApril , 1997 but due to sickness of his mother he unable tocollect it. Then concerned workman informed first party that he would resume on duty on 2-5-1997. Even he wrote lettertoDivisional Manager - II on 21-11-2000 and requested tosend all his correspondence at his new address , Tagore Nagar, Vikhroli (E) , Mumbai- 83. Said corresponder.cewas served onDivisional Manager.
Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office-II , 112, Sion Koliwada Road, Sion, Mumbai -400022.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
5. Concernedworkman by his letter dated 30-7-2001 addressedto Sr. Divisional Manager requesting to reinstate him since he learnt that , he was terminated treating his absenteeism and presuming that he has not abandoned thejob w.e.f. 30-12-1997.
TheGeneral Secretary, Insurance Employees ' Union 88/112, Sion Koliwada Road, Sion( E) , Mumbai -400022.
APPEARANCES :
:
For theEmployer
Ms. A. A. Sakpal ,
Ms. F. D. Lewis, Representatives .
For the Workmen
Mr. C. S. Dalvi , Representative.
6. According to concerned workman , по opportunity was given to him to explain about his absenteeism . No charge sheet was served . No enquirywas conducted. Thedecision taken by management was exparte and bias . Said decision taken by first party was not taken byfollowing principles of natural justice . Even charge of absenteeism is not proved. So it is submitted that, decision taken by management of removal of concerned workman from services of first party w.e.f. 30-12-97 is not just and properwhich require to quash and set aside with direction to first party to reinstate the concerned workman with benefits ofbackwages and continuity ofservice.
1506 GL07-19 9526
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKΑ 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]
has stated in the cross that, post ofHigher Grade Assistant is a promotional post and is of supervisory category . He also states that, post of Higher Grade Assistant is of supervisory at branch level in different sections who can take decision at divisłon level regarding acceptance ofthe claim policy and passing of vouchers . So this is the only evidence about concerned employee . Presuming that, post ofHigher Grade Assistant is a promotional post it does not mean that, it is only a post of managerial cadre .No doubt, person posted on the post of Higher Grade Assistant though has power to take decision regarding policy claim and acceptance of policy and passing of the vouchers , it cannot be presumed that he is not workman . Employee working in that cadre has to see the guidelines while deciding claim, vis- a-vis accepting policy claim and passing out vouchers . By any stretch of imagination , work of passing vouchers cannot be treated as an administrative job since vouchers are passed of the amount which is sanctioned . Beside accepting claim and taking decision of policy claim is also considered as per the guidelines given by the LIC . Person working on that post cannot cross those guidelines . In each case , what type of claim is to be sanctioned, all this work is done by following the guidelines . It is not that, person working on post of Higher Grade Assistant is taking part in deciding the policy which is to be followed to consider particular claim . When that power is not with the person working , though he work on the post of Higher Grade Assistant like concemed employee working in the post, in my considered view, he cannot be treated as not workman .
7. This demand is opposed by the first party by filing written statement Ex - 6 stating that , second party is not a workman. This Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the prayer prayed by the union to reinstate concerned workman. Besides it is stated that , concerned workman was intimated about decision taken by first party of conducting enquiry. The charges were communicated to concerned workman. Concerned workman denied those charges . On that enquiry committee was formed . Correspondence was made regarding that which returned with remarks " not claimed " and " left " . The possible efforts were made by first party to intimate concerned workman about its decision to proceed against concerned workman byformingenquiry committee and proceeding against him to take action . Since concerned workman purposely avoided to participate in the enquiry, Inquiry Officer concluded concerned workman guilty of charge of absenteeism without permission . Besides demand made byconcerned workman is made at very belated stage nearly four years after . Beside he has not explained the reason behind absenteeism by producing cogent evidence . Moreover the stand taken by concerned workman that , he has under gone psychiatric treatment is also not proved by any evidence . The Inquiry Officer submitted that , after taking effort to bring concerned workman in the enquiry and face the trial , he observed concerned workman guilty of charge of absenteeism . Since said decision was taken which was challenged by the concerned workman and whichwas turndown by the appellate authority, disciplinary authority took decision to remove the concerned workman from the employment of first party. So it is submitted that; prayer prayed by Union to reinstate concerned workman cannot be considered and decision given by Inquiry Officer cannot be observed , taken without following principles of natural justice.
18. In view of above pleadings , issues are framed at Ex-10 out of them issue of workman along with fairness of enquiry and perversity of findings are taken as preliminary issues which are answered as follows :
Issues
Findings
Yes .
i. Whether this Tribunal has jurisdiction?
Yes.
ii . Is second party workman?
No.
iii . Is enquiry fair and proper?
Yes.
iv. Is findings perverse?
REASONS
1
Issue No.1 & 2 :-
9. These issues are pertaining to status of concerned workman andjurisdiction of Tribunal . Second party Union claim that, concerned employee is a ' workman ' whereas first party claim that , concerned employee is not workman . As far as this contention is concerned, both have not led any specific evidence, in support of their stand about status ofconcerned employee . The witness of first party at Ex -16
10. Management has filed written submission at Ex- 20 whereas second party filed at Ex- 19. Even some case laws are referredby the management including the citation published in AIR 1982 SC page 1126. While deciding Writ Petition between A.V. Nachane and anr . V/s Union of India, Apex Court observed that, Corporation has power to make rules Under Section 48 (2) ( cc) . Since such rules are approved in the Parliament, it has legal status and in that case, provision of Industrial Disputes Act does not come in the way of power of LIC to make rule as made under Section 48 (2 ) (cc). Taking reference of this case the written arguments submitted by the first party tried to stretch the decision given in this case and tried to subrnit that, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the grievance of the employees working in LIC of India. In my considered view, the very impression is carried by first party that, presuming this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the grievances of the employees working in LIC , which in myopinion is on wrong interpretation of the decision given byApex Court referred (supra) . Infact in that case, there was a question of power of LIC which reduced the benefits given to Class - III and Class - IV employees regarding payment of bonus which was taken on 21-1-1974 and 6-1- 1973 giving retrospective effect observing , claim based on settlement is not a fundamental right, which cannot be 9527 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/ कार्तिक 26 , 1929
Tribunal has very welljurisdiction over the subject matter referred in the reference .
Issue No 3 & 4:-
enforced through the Writ jurisdiction . When such Rules and Regulations are made by using power under Section 48 (2 ) ( cc) of LIC Act, such power cannot be challenged under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and in my considered view that was the spirit of the ratio referredby the advocate for first party. This ratio does not any where say that, Central Government Industrial Tribunal has no power to consider the grievances ofthe employees working with LIC of India .
12. As far as the enquiry and its findings are concerned, it is matter of record that, concerned workman did not participate in the enquiry. It is matter ofrecord that, the attempts of service of chargesheet, intimation of enquiry and other correspondences are concerned, were not served on concerned workman and all returned " not claimed " , or " unserved" . It is also matter of record that , concerned workman did not participate in the enquiry. No evidence is recorded by Inquiry Officer of concerned workman . It is matter of record that , enquiry was exparte .
13. The record and proceedings revels that , concerned workman did not get opportunity to make out his case. Even the pleading of the concerned workman refers that, his mother was sick and then he became mentally sick and unable to point out the same to first party. Even he made out case that, by number of correspondences he tried to intimate first party . But record and proceedings revels that, it is not considered by Inquiry Officer or by the firsy party. So one has to conclude that, concerned workman did not get an opportunity to make out his case as well as explain about his absenteeism. It is matter of record that, mere absenteeism is the cause behind removing concerned workman from the employment . However cocerned workman did not get an opportunity to explain it . So I conclude that , there was no fair enquiry and Inquiry Officer was not having reasons to observe concerned workman absent without any reason. In this scenario I conclude that , enquiry was not fair and findings perverse .
14. In view of discussion made above I conclude that, concerned workman must get an opportunity. Hence theorder:
ORDER
(1) observe enquiry not fair and proper and findings perverse.
(2) I direct first party to justify its action .
Date: 27-9-2007.
:
A. A. LAD, PresidingOfficer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
का.आ. 3342.-औद्योगिक 'विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 54/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-41012/115/2004- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी 11. Besides first party place reliance on citation published in AIR 1998 Supreme Court page 327 where LIC took decision to terminate probationer during probation observing need not be considered when terminated during probation period as Corporation has that right and provisions of Industrial Disputes Act does not come in the way of such termination. While deciding case of LIC of India V/ s . Raghaveridra Seshagiri Rao , Apex Court observed that, at the time of posting if a condition of satisfactory performance is made to continue the employee and if decision is taken on the performance of the probationer observing not satisfactory and discontinued on that ground, in that case , said termination cannot be treated as a retrenchment and cannot amount to retrenchment within Section 2 (oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act and does not Invite protection given to employee under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. In the Amendment Act of 1981 , LIC has made rule to that effect which were passed by the Parliament and the rule which is passed by the parliament has equal force as of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act which is also passed in the parliament . So as far as probationary employee is concerned, definitely provisions of Industrial Disputes Act cannot protect such , a probationer if terminated during probation period by L.I.C. One more citation is referred by the first party's advocate published in AIR 1994 Supreme Court page 1343 on which first party bank to say that, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction, but in my considered view the decision taken in that case (Supra) i.e. the decision taken in M. Venugopal V/ s LIC of India was regarding decision taken by the LIC about the probationers whose services were terminated during probation period only as, happened in above referred case . Since their appointment was for the probation period and condition was laid if such an employee passes probationn satisfactorily then and then only, will be considered for continuity of service . Even there was a regulation passed byParliament under Section 48 (2C). Naturally and legally when both acts are passed in Parliament and have equal status and LIC being Special Act has upper hand over the Industrial Disputes Act as far as decision taken by the LIC regarding probationary employees is concerned, all these ruling does not lebar this Tribunal at any level to consider the other grievances of other employees except the employees who suffer by the decision of LIC taken under Section 48 (2) ( cc) of LIC Act . So I conclude that , this 9528
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 17 , 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
NewDelhi, the24th October, 2007
Mumbai in giving punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri Shrikant Tiwari , Head Booking Clerk, Parel, Central Railway is justified? If not, what relief the workman Shri Shrikant Tiwari is entitled to ? "
S.O. 3342.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Railway, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007 .
2. Claim statement is filed at Ex- 6 by the General Secretary of the Union in support of his demand which was challenged by first party Central Railway by filing written statement Ex- 8 . Stage was for framing issues .
[No. L-41012/ 115/2004- IR(B-1) ]
AJAY KUMAR, DeskOfficer
ANNEXURE
3.Meanwhile today, concerned workman Shri Shrikan Tiwari byEx- 15 & 16 requested to take reference on board saying that, he wants to dispose it of and produced Ex - 16 signed by General Secretary of the Union. He also admits the contents of the Exhibits Hence the order:
ORDER
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT
In view ofExhibit- 15 & Exhibit- 16 , reference is disposed of for want of prosecution . No order as to cost .
Date:5-10-2007
A. A. LAD, PresidingOfficer REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/54 OF 2005
i
A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer
Exh. No. 15 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL RAILWAY
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2 The Divisional Railway Manager (P),
REFERENCE NO. CGIT/2/54 OF 2005 CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI CentralRailway, Divisional Office, Personnel Branch, Mumbai CST, Mumbai -400001 .
Vs Shri S. K. Tiwari
May it please your honour :--
AND TheirWorkmen
The above matter was fixed for framing issues on 14- 11-2007. The Union prays that the said date may be preponed and fixed on 5-10-2007 and on that date the Union is going to make an application for disposal of the above reference.
Mumbai,
TheGeneral Secretary, Madhya Railway Karmchari Sangh , 33,Moti Bhawan, Dr. D'SilvaRoad, Dejdar(W), Mumbai-400028.
Dated5-10-2007
Appearance:
:
FortheEmployer
(General Secretary) M. R. K. S. Mr. Abhay Kulkarni Advocate
Exh. No. 16 :
For the Workman
Mr. K. Badu Rajan Advocate
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Mumbai , dated 5th October, 2007.
AWARD
Matrix of the facts as culled out from the reference
are as under:
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 REFERENCE NO. CGIT/2/54 OF 2005 CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI Vs
Shri S. K. Tiwari
Mayit please your honour:-
The Union does not want to persent with the above reference and the same may be disposed of accordingly. Mumbai,
1. The Governrnment of India, Ministry of Labour , byits OrderNo.L-41012/ 115/2004 [ IR (B- 1)] dated 15-2-2005 in exsrcise ofths powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section (1) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
Dated 5-10-2007
"Whether the action of the Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway , Mumbai Division CST,
(General Secretary) 9529
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/ कार्तिक 26 , 1929
[ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
M. R. K. S.
For the Management :M/s. Anand, Abdul & Vinodh
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2007
TheCentralGovernment, Ministry of Labour vide its OrderNo. L-44011 /6/2006- (IR(B- II) dated 12-2-2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
का.आ. 3343.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार तूतीकोरन पोर्ट ट्रस्टके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
"Whether the non - reimbursement of Medical Claim preferred by Sri Avudaiappan in respect of Mrs. Bhuvaneshwari by the Management of Tuticorin Port Trust islegal and justified ? " If not, what relief is the workman is entitled?"
[सं. एल-44011/6/2006- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 24th October, 2007
S.O. 3343.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.14/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial disputebetween the management of Tuticorin Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-10-2007.
[No. L-44011/6/2006- IR(B-II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Wednesday, the 29th August, 2007
Present
: K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ΝΟ . 14/2007
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause(d) of sub-section ( 1) and sub-section 2( A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the Management of Tuticorin Port Trust and theirWorkmen)
Between
: I Party/Petitioner Union
TheGeneral Secretary Tuticorin Port Mariners and General StaffUnion Beach Road Tuticorin - 628001
Vs.
: II Party/Management
The Chairman Tuticorin Port Trust, Tuticorin
APPEARANCE:
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 14/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Even though two notices were served to the petitioner union which espouses the cause of the workman, the union has not apperared before this Court and therefore, petitioner is set exparte and memo of objection was called for from the Respondent/ Management . Respondent appeared through Advocate and filed the statement of objectionwherein it is stated in the matter of reimbursement ofmedical expenses of the officers/employees of Tuticorin Port Trust and their dependent family members are governend by the Central Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1944 and the same have been made applicable by the virtue of the provisions contained in Tuticorin Port TrustAdaptation of Rules Regulations , 1979 approved by the Central Government and published in the Gazette . The said rules provide for reimbursement of medical expenses when treatment is taken either in the government or recognized hospitals . Further , it states in emergent cases , the Govt . servants or members of the family may be admitted in the nearest private hospital in the absence of Govt . or recognized hospital nearer than the private hospital and reimbursement of expenditure made . Further , in emergent cases involving accidents of serious nature or diseases , the person/ persons on the spot may use their discretion for taking the patient for treatment in a private hospital if available in case no government or recognized hospital is available nearer than the private hospital and the power to decide the merits of the case has been given to the controlling authority to know whether it was a case of real emergency necessitating admission in private hospital . The Respondent/Management has also issued O. M. dated 19-02-2000 for streamlining the procedure for getting treatment in a private hospital by the employees or their dependent family members . In this case , Sri Avudaiappan , Lascar , Marine Department had submitted amedical reimbursement for Rs . 14,746.90 towards the treatment ofhis wife, Smt. Bhuvaneshwari for delivery at a private hospital " Krishna Maternity Home & Paediatric Centre" , Palayamkottai but as per the medical records produced by the concerned employee , his wife with labour For the Petitioner
:None 9530
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 17, 2007/KARTIKA 26, 1929
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]
1
but he never brought his wife to Tuticorin Port dispensary for any check - up during her whole gestation period. Further, the concerned employee is residing at Palayamkottai for his own convenience . Even in the memo dated 19-02-2000 , it is clearly stated that the employees who are living outside Tuticorin and who are taking treatment in a private hospital of their choice, are not entitled to reimbursement of medical claim towards the treatment taken inthe private hospital for delivery case whatever may be the reason . Further, he has not stated for what reasons , he had admitted his wife in a unrecognized private hospital in Palayamkottai when there is already a Government Medical CollegeHospital near to his place. Therefore , his claim was rejected for reimbursement . As already stated, the petitioner union has not appeared before this Court to contradict the contention of the Respondent/ Management that the concerned employee is entitled to reimbursement even in such cases. Therefore, I find the non- reimbursement ofthe medical claim preferred by the concerned employee , Shri Avudaiappan in respect of his wife's claim by the Respondent/Management is legal and justified.
4. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief.
5.Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.
pain was admitted in the said private hospital on 11-11-2004 and she underwent caesarean section with sterlisation operation on 12-11-2004 and she was also discharged from private hospital on 20-11-2004 . But the concerned employee's Medical Card is in Tuticorin Port dispensary at Tuticorin and the employee never brought his wife to the Respondent's Port Trust dispensary for any check- up during her whole gestation period . From this , it is clearly evident that from the beginning the said employee has made up his mind to have the delivery conducted at his native place , Palayamkottai and not in Port Trust Hospital at Tuticorin . Further , the concerned employee is residing at Palayamkottai for his own convenience. There is no provision for the employees who are living outside Tuticorin to take treatment in private hospital of their choice . Alternatively , he could have admitted his wife in Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital , a Govt . Hospital at Palayamkottai which is a few yards away from the private hospital . Further, as per the O.M. dated 19-02-2000 issued by the Respondent/Management regarding reimbursement of medical claims towards treatment taken in the private hospital , delivery cases are not eligible for reimbursement ofmedical expenses , whatever may be reason . Hence the claim for reimbursement for medical expenses incurred by Sri R. Avudaiappan for taking treatment of his wife in a private hospital was rejected . Therefore , the claim made by the concerned employee does not come under the purview of the guidelines issued by the Respondent/Management . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
(Dicated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him, corrected arid pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 29th August, 2007)
Points for determination are :
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2007
(i) Whether the non- reimbursement of medical claim. preferred by the concerned employee in respect of his wife's treatmentby the Respondent/Management is legal andjustified?
(ii) To what relief the workman is entitled?
Point No. ( i) & ( ii )
का.आ. 3344.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार तूतीकोरन पोर्ट ट्रस्टके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाटा ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-10-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-44011/4/2006- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ]
राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 24th October, 2007
م
S.O. 3344.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 15/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Tuticorin Port Trust and their workmen , received by the Central Govemment on24-10-2007 .
3. In this case as I have already pointed out even though two notices were served to the petitioner union, the petitioner union has not appeared before this Court nor filed any statement. On the other hand, the Respondent appeared through his advocate and filed memo of objection . The issue involved in this case is that the concerned employee has admitted his wife in a private hospital at Palayamkottai which is a far off place from the headquarters viz. Tuticorin and when he made a claim for reimbursement of the expenses made by him in the private hospital , the Respondent authorities have rejected his claim on the ground that his claim does not come under the Central Services ( Medical Attendance) Rules . It is further contended on behalf of the Respondent that the concerned employee is very well aware that the treatment is available in the Tuticorin Port Trust dispensary in Tuticorin town
[No. L-44011 /4/2006- IR(B- II) ]
RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Wednesday, the 29th August, 2007 Present
: K. Jayaraman , PresidingOfficer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 14/2007 (In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Tuticorin Port Trust and theirWorkmen)
BETWEEN:
:Petitioner/ I Party
TheGeneral Secretary Tuticorin Port Mariners and General Staff Union Beach Road Tuticorin - 623 001 Vs.
: Reaspondent/ II Party The Chairman Tuticorin Port Trust Tuticorin
APPEARANCE :
: None
Forthe Petitioner
: None
For the Management
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-44011 /4/2006 ( IR(B - II ) dated 12-2-2007 referred the following, Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the Claim of Tuticarin Port Mariners and General Staff Union for permission to exercise option for fixation of pay in respect of Sri S. Samson , Valve Operator
9531
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 17 , 2007/कार्तिक 26 , 1929
is legal and justified? If not, what relief is the workman/ union is entitled ?"
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 15/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Even though two notices have been served to both parties , both parties have not appeared before this Tribunal to proceed with the enquiry. Therefore, both parties have set ex-parte and orders have been passed in this case .
Points for determination are:
(i)Whether the claim ofTuticorin Port Mariners and General Staff Union for permission to exercise option for fixation ofpay in respect of Sri S. Samson , Valve Operator islegal and justified?
entitled? (ii) If not , what relief is the workman/union is Point No. (i) & ( ii)
3. Though the petitioner union has raised this dis- pute viz . that the Respondent/Management has rejected the claim ofthe union for permission to exercise the option for fixation ofpay in respect of Sri S. Samson , Valve Opera- tor illegally, they have not come before this Tribunal and establish their case. Similarly , the Respondent has also not appeared before this Tribunal to establish their contention that the claim of the petitioner union has rightly rejected . As such, this Tribunal cannot come into the conclusion whether the claim of the petitioner union is valid or not . Since the burden of proving that the petitioner union is genuine and which was illegally rejected by the Respon- dent/Management, is upon the petitioner and since the petitioner union has not established this fact with any sat- isfactory evidence , I find the petitioner claim is to be re- jected . Therefore , I find the workman concerned is not en- titled to any relief.
8.Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dicated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and prounced by me in the open court on this day the 29thnd August , 2007 )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer,
Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.