This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05

सत्यमेव जमते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 50]

नई दिल्ली , दिसम्बर 9 दिसम्बर 15 , 2007 , शनिवार/अग्रहायण 18 अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

No. 50 ] NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 9 DECEMBER 15, 2007 , SATURDAY/AGRAHA YANA 18- AGRAHA YANA 24, 1929 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके । Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation .

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii)

PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय

(कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 5 दिसम्बर , 2007

अधीन दर्ज मामला सं. 346/06 में अन्वेषण के लिए तथा उपर्युक्त उपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों , दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए तथा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत . किन्हीं अन्य अपराध/अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण असम राज्य पर करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/41 /2007- एवीडी-11 ]

मनीषा सक्सैना , उप सचिव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi , the 5th December , 2007

का.आ. 3471.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए असम राज्य सरकार के राजनीतिक ( ए ) विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. पीएलए, 159/2007 / 18 - ए दिनांक 30 जून , 2007 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से राजस्व आसूचना निदेशालय , गुवाहाटी , असम के तरूण कुमार दत्ता , आसूचना अधिकारी की हत्या से संबंधित चांदमारी पुलिस स्टेशन में भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 302 सपठित आयुद्य अधिनियम, 1959 (1959 का अधिनियम सं. 54 ) की धारा 27 और भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 1:20- बी के

S.O. 3471. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the 4878 G1/2007

(9707) 9708

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

Notification No. 71814 /M3 /2007/Home dated 18th August, 2007, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for investigation of offences involved in Crime No. 355/2005 of Payyoli Police Station in Kozhikode District in connection with the death of Muhammed Althaf, the case inter connected with issues relating to Crime No. 1/05 and Crime No. 158/2005 of Payyoli Police Station which have already by transferred to Central Bureau of Investigation for investigation .

[No. 228 /60/2005-AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent ofState Government of Assam Political (A) Department , Dispur videNotification No. PLA 159/2007/ 18 -A dated 30th June , 2007, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of State of Assam for investigation of Case No. 346/06 under Section 302 ofthe Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) read with Section 27 of the Arms Act , 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Add. Section 120 - B of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at Chandmari Police Station relating to murder of Tarun Kr . Dutta, Intelligence Officer of the Directorate Revenue Intelligence (DRI ) Guwahati , Assam and any other offence /Offences, Attempts , abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with above mentioned offences committed in the course of the same transaction arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/41 /2007 -AVD - II ] MANISHA SAXENA , Dy . Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3473.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए के.अ. ब्यूरो के अभियोजन अधिकारी श्री मोहम्मद फरीद को दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा किसी भी राज्य या संघ शासित क्षेत्र , में जिसमें उपरोक्त धारा लागू हो , विधि द्वारा स्थापित विचारण न्यायालय और अपील/पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में मामलों या इनसे संबंधित मामलों का पुनरीक्षण या अपील न्यायालयों में संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 225/56/2007- एवीडी- II ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2007

का.आ. 3472. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केरल राज्य सरकार, गृह ( एम ) विभाग की दिनांक 18 अगस्त, 2007 की अधिसूचना सं 71814/एम -3/2007/गृह द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से मुहम्मद अल्ताफ की मृत्यु के संबंध में कोजीकोड जिले में पय्योली पुलिस. स्टेशन के अपराध सं. 355/2005 में शामिल अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शंक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य पर करती है, यह मामला पप्योली पुलिस स्टेशन के अपराध सं. 1/05 और अपराध सं. 158/05 से संबंधित मामलों से अंतर संबंधित है जिन्हें पहले ही अन्वेषण के लिए केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो को हस्तांतरित किया जा चुका है ।

[फा. सं. 228/60/2005 -ए वी डी. II ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2007

S.O. 3473. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Modh . Fareed , Prosecuting Officer of the Central Bureau of Investigation as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI ) in trials courts and appeals / revisions or other matters arising out of these cases inrevisional or appellate Courts , established by law in any State or Union Territory to which provisions ofthe aforesaid Section apply.

S.O. 3472. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Kerala Home ( M ) Department , vide

[No. 225 /56/ 2007 - AVD - II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9709

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3474.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध )स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंक कारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा श्री सतीय गोयल को अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा उनके उत्तराअधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , कार्पोरेशन बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर - सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा सं. 9/22/2006- बीओ- I ]

जी.बी. सिंह , उप सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007 S.O. 3474. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section 3 (h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub - clause ( 1) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Satish Goel as part - time non- official director on the Board of Directors of Corporation Bank for a period of three years from the date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/22/2006-BO- I ] G.B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

वस्त्रमंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3475.-केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 61 ) की धारा 4 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अध्यधीन इस अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए निम्नलिखित व्यक्ति का नामांकन अधिसूचित करती है ।

उपर्युक्तअधिनियम की धारा 4(3) (जे ) के अंतर्गत केंद्र

सरकार द्वारा नामित श्री अनिल कुमार , एम एल , सुपुत्र श्री वी लक्ष्मी गौड़ा, गांव मदनाहल्ली, पोस्ट: वेलागलबरी तालुक व जिला: कोलार (कर्नाटक)

[फा. सं. 25012/56/99 - रेशम]

भूपेन्द्र सिंह , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF TEXTILES New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007 S.O. 3475. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3) of Section 4 of the Central Silk BoardAct . 1948 , the Central Government hereby notifies the nomination ofthe following person to serve as member of the Central Silk Board for a period of three years from the date of this notification subject to the provisions of the said Act.

Nominatedby theCentral Government under Section 4(3) (J) ofthe Act. Shri Anil Kumar , M.L. , S/o Shri V. Lakshme Gowda, Vill.Madanahally , P.O. Velagalburre, Taluk & Distt.: Kolar (Karnataka)

[F.No. 25012/56/99 -Silk]

BHUPENDRA , SINGH , Jt. Secy .

संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिक मंत्रालय

(डाक विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 3 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3476.-राजभाषा नियम ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजन के लिए प्रयोग ) 1976 के नियम-10 के उप नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार , डाक विभाग के अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों को जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारी ( ग्रुप घ कर्मचारियों को छोड़कर ) ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है । क्रम सं कार्यालयों का नाम

पिनकोड चम्बा मंडलीय कार्यालय

176310 1.

176310 2. चम्बा मुख्य डाकघर

3. बकलोह उप डाकघर

176301 4. बनीखेत उप डाकघर

176303 9710

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

1 2

176306

5. बाधरी बाजार उप डाकघर

Rules 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following Subordinate Offices of the Department of Posts where 80 percent staff has acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :-

176315

6. भरमौर उप डाकघर

PinCode

Sl.No. Name ofOffice

176316

7. भंजराडू तीसा उप डाकघर

1. 2

176308

8. भलेई उप डाकघर

176302

176310 9.

1. Chamba Division

चुवाड़ी उप डाकघर

176310

Chamba H.O.

176304

डलहौजी उप डाकघर

10.

176301

3. Bakloh S.O.

176304

11 . डलहौजी कोर्ट रोड

176303

4. Banikhet S.O.

176305

डलहौजी कैंट उप डाकघर

12.

176306

Bathri -Bazar S.O.

176324

गैहरा उप डाकघर

13.

176315

6. Bharmour S.O.

176309

14. गरोला उप डाकघर

176316

7. Bhanjrau -Tissa S.O.

176318

15. हरदासपुरा उप डाकघर

8. Bhalei S.O.

176308

176313

ककीरा उप डाकघर

176302

9. Chowari S.O.

176323

17. किलाड़ पांगी उप डाकघर

176304

10. Dalhousie

176325

खैरी उप डाकघर

18.

176304

Dalhousie Court Road NDSO ..

11.

176305

176311

19. मैहला उप डाकघर

Dalhousie Cantt . S. O.

12.

176324

13. Gehra S.O.

176321

नकरोड उप डाकघर

20.

176309

14. Garola S.O.

176319

21. पुखरी उपडाकघर

176318

15. Hardaspure S.O.

176310

22. रंग मेहल एन डी एस ओ

Kakira S.O.

176313

16.

176207

सिहुंता उप डाकघर

176323

17. Killar-Pangi S.O.

176317

24. सुरगानी उप डाकघर

176325

18. Khairi S.O.

176312

25. सुंडला उप डाकघर

19. Mehla S.O.

176311

176314

26.

176321

Nakror S.O.

20.

सुलतानपुर उप डाकघर

176319

Pukhri S.O.

176320

21.

27. सलूनो उप डाकघर

176310

22. Rang Mehal NDSO

[सं. 11017-1/2007- रा.भा. ]

176207

23. Sihunta S.O.

176317

24. Surangani S.O.

स. चक्रवतीं, उप महानिदेशक (स्थापना एवं राजभाषा )

176312

Sundla S.O.

25.

176314

26. Sultanpur S.O.

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND IT

176320

27. Salooni

(Department of Posts)

[No. 11017-1 /2007 -OL] New Delhi , the 3rd December, 2007

S.O. 3476. In pursuance of Rule 10 ( 4 ) of the Official Language ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union )

S.K. CHAKRABARTI, Dy. Director General (Estt. & OL) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9711 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 15 नवम्बर, 2007

का.आ. 3477.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड, पोवई, मुंबई-400072 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले "के " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/ 298 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। लिंविवड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 से अधिक या उसके बराबर की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 60 कि.ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10*, 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 153 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 15th November , 2007

S.O. 3477.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument with digital indication of " K " series of special accuracy (accuracy class - I ) with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " ( herein referred to as the said Model) , manufacturedby M/s . Mettler - Toledo India Private Limited , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai -400 072 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/9/07 /298 ;

The said Model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60kg and minimum capacity of 100g . the verification scale interval (e ) is lg. It has a tare device with 100 perecnt subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V . , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performacne of same series with maximum capacity up to 60kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) equal to or more than 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2× 10k or 5x10 % , k being positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 153 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 9713 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3478.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर टोलडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , एस वी , रोड , पोवई, मुंबई -400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " इंड 22 × -टी" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर टोलडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/383 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है। इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड, ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । :

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम को धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10000 तक की रेज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधि कतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * या 5 × 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 189 )/2007] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9714

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2007

S.O. 3478. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use' and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " IND 22x - T " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name " Mettler - Toledo " ( herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Mettler - Toledo India Private Ltd. , Amar Hills , S.V. Road, Powai , Mumbai- 400 072, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/07/383;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V. , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

ING- 22x Series

aring

221

00.000

Seatm

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performacne of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , inanufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 189)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 9715 [भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायण 24,1929

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3479.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , एस. वी. रोड, पोवई, मुंबई -400 072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) ` वाले " इंड 22x- पी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/07/384 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है। सुत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5× 10 * , के हैं, जहाँ पर ' के' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 189 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4878 G1/07-2 9716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2007

S.O. 3479.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " IND 22xP " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) and with brand name " Mettler Toledo " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Mettler - Toledo India Private Ltd. , Amar Hills , S.V. Road , Powai , Mumbai -400 072 , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/07/384;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with 100 perecnt substractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V. , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

sealing In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram , working principle etc. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.

th Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and perforamance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000 kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 x 10k or 5 x 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same nanufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 189)/ 2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 9717 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3480.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधित लागू होने कीतिथि

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31नवम्बर , 2007

1 अक्तूबर , 2007

आई एस 1248 ( भाग 1 ) 2003 प्रत्यक्ष क्रियाशील सूचक अनुरूप वैद्युत मापन उपकरण तथा उनके सहायक उपकरण भाग 1 परिभाषाएँ तथा सामान्य अपेक्षाएँ (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 12/टी-1 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञानिक एवं प्रमुख (विद्युत तकनीकी)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 29th November, 2007

S.O. 3480.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule (1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. & Year ofthe Indian

No& year ofthe

Amendment

Sl. No. Standards

Date fromwhich the amendment shall have effect (2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

31November , 2007

1October , 2007

IS 1248 ( Part 1) : 2003 Direct acting indicating Analogue Electrical measuring Instruments and their accessories Part 1 Definitions and general requirements (Fourth Revision)

Copy of this Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune , and Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET 12/T- 1 ]

P. K. MUKHERJEE , Sc . F & Head ( Electrot echnical) ) 9718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3( ii )]

नई दिल्ली , 6 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3481, - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की

स्थापित तिथि सं. संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1.

सितम्बर , 2007 आईएस 8692 ( भाग 3 ) : 2007/ आईएसओ 3338-3: 1996 मिलिंग कटर के लिए बेलनाकार शैंक भाग 3 चूड़ीदार शैंक के आयामी अभिलक्षण

जनवरी , 2007 2. आईएस 8919 :2007/आईएसओ 2905 : 1985 मशीन औजार निर्माण के लिए माँडुयूलर इकाईयां बहु सिपंड्ल शीर्षों के लिए सिपंड्ल नोज और समायोजनीय एडाप्टर ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

अगस्त, 2007 3. आईएस 15371 ( भाग 2 ) :2007/ आईएसओ/टीएस 14253-2: 1999 ज्यामितीय उत्पाद विशिष्टियाँ (जी.पी.एस. ) वर्कपीस के मापन द्वारा निरीक्षण तथा मापक उपस्कर भाग 2 मापन उपस्कर के अंशशोधन में , उत्पाद सत्यापन में और जी. पी. एस. मापन में अनिश्चितता आकलन को मार्गदर्शिका

सितम्बर , 2007 आईएस 15371 ( भाग 3 ) :2007/आईएसओ/टीएस 14253-3 :2002 ज्यामितीय उत्पाद विशिष्टियाँ (जी.पी.एस. )- वर्कपीस के मापन द्वारा निरीक्षण तथा मापक उपस्कर भाग 3 मापन अनिश्चितता कथनों पर करार के मार्गदर्शी सिद्धांत

अगस्त, 2007 5. आईएस 15759 :2007/आईएसओ 12179:2000 ज्यामितीय उत्पाद विशिष्टियाँ ( जी.पी.एस. )सतह की बनावटः प्रोफाइल पद्धति - संपर्क ( स्टाइलस ) पकरणों का अंशशोधन

सितम्बर , 2007 आईएस 15762:2007/आईएसओ 5413 : 1993 मशीन औजार - मोर्स टेपर्स का पॉजीटिव ड्राइव

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : पीजीडी/जी-3.5 ]

पी. सी. जोशी, वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख (पीजीडी)

New Delhi , the 6th December, 2007

S.O. 481. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

9719 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

SCHEDULE

Date of Establish- SI. No.

No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

ment

No. & year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

September,2007

1. IS 8692 (Part 3): 2007/ISO 3338-3:1996 Cylindrical shanks for milling cutters Part 3 Dimensional characteristics of threaded shanks

January,2007 2. IS 8919 : 2007 /ISO 2905 : 1985 Moclular units for machine tool construction- Spindle noses and adjustable adaptors for multi spindle heads ( first Revision)

August, 2007 3. IS 15371 (Part 2) : 2007/ISO Geometrical product specifications (GPS )-Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment Part 2 Guide to the estimation ofun- certainty in GPS measurement , in calibration of measuring equipment and in product verification

September, 2007 4. IS 1.537 (Part 3 ) : 2007 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)- Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment Part 3 Guidlines for achieving agreements on measure- ment uncertainty statements

August, 2007 5. IS 15759 : 2007/ISO 12179 :2000 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)-Surface texture: Profile Method-Calibration of conduct (stylus) Instruments

September,2007 6. IS 15762: 2007/ISO 5413: 1993 Machine tools- Positive drive of morse tapers

Copy ofthese standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: PGD/G-3.5 ]

P. C. JOSHI , Scientist ' E' & Head (PGD)

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3482.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न भारतीय मानक में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-

9720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की

क्रम सं. संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

1. आईएस 14181 ( भाग 1 ): 2002 संशिलष्ट (प्लास्टिक) सरकवां फास्टनर-विशेष प्रयोजन - भाग । उत्पाद के लिए विशिष्टि, चयन एवं भाग का रूप ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

(4) (3)

मार्च , 2007 इस भारतीय मानक के संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002 , क्षेत्रीध कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नाई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयाम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : पीजीडी/जी-3.5 ] पी. सी. जोशी , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( पीजीडी )

New Delhi , the 6th December, 2007

S.O. 3482. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been amended on the date indicated against each :

Sl. No.

No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

(2)

(1)

1 .

IS 14181 (Pt 1 ): 2002 Specification, selection and ordering guidline of the product ( first revision)

SCHEDULE

No. of Amendments and Date

Dateof Establishment

(4)

(3)

March, 2007 Copy ofthese Amendments of Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: PGD/G- 3.5]

P. C. JOSHI , Scientist ' E ' Head ( PGD)

नई दिल्ली, 6 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3483. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों) की सं. संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(1)

1. आईएस 15741 :2007 वस्त्रादि- पर्दों और डेपों की अग्नि अवरोधकता -विशिष्टि

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4) (3)

जून , 2007 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9721 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4) 2.

आई एस 15742:2007 वस्त्रादि-

जून , 2007 सीमित ज्वाला फैलाने की वस्तुओं से बनी उष्मा एवं ज्वाला से बचाव करने वाली वस्त्र सामग्री कीअपेक्षाएं-

विशिष्टि

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110 002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : टीएक्सडी/जी-25 ]

एम. एस. वर्मा, निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी)

NewDelhi, the 6th December , 2007

S.O. 3483. In pursuance of clause (b ) ofsub- rule ( 1) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

No. & year of Indian Standards ,

Sl. No.

No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

Date of Established

ifany, Superseded by the

New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

IS 15741 :2007

June, 2007 Textiles-Resistance to Ignition of Curtains and Drapes-Specification

IS15742:2007

June, 2007 Textiles-Requirements for Clothing made of Limited Flame Spread Materials and Material Assemblies affording Protection against Heat and Flame- Specification

Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bliopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: TXD/G-25]

M. S. VERMA, Director & Head ( Textiles )

नई दिल्ली, 06 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3484.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-

9722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) )

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक की

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

सं. संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (2)

(3)

(1)

(4) 1.

आईएस 2422: 1985

संशोधन संख्या 3 नवम्बर , 2007

नवम्बर , 2007 इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : टी एक्स/जी -25 ]

एम. एस. वर्मा , निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी )

New Delhi , the 6th December , 2007

S.O. 3484.-In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that ammendents to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

Sl . No.

No. & year of the

amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

IS 2422 : 1985

AmendmentNo. 3 November , 2007 November , 2007 Copy ofthese Amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: TXD/G -25 ]

M. S. VERMA , Director & Head ( Textiles )

नई दिल्ली , 06 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3485.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के नियम ( 4 ) के उप नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एक्तद्वारा अधिसूचित करता हैं कि जिन लाइसेन्सों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है , वे स्वीकृत ( Granted ) कर दिये गए है: -

अनुसूची

क्रम सं. लाइसेंस सं.

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

चालूतिथि

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक व संबंधित भारतीय मानक

अक्टूबर 2007

8864405

29-09-2007

8794: 1988 सीआईडी ज्वाईन्ट्स

मैसर्स एस . के. इण्डस्ट्रीज ( इण्डिया) 190ए, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र झोटवाडा, जयपुर- 302 012 (राजस्थान) 9723 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

02 8865508

03-10-2007

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्स वर्धमान ज्वैलर्स

अग्रसेन मार्केट

सांगरिया, हनुमानगढ़-335063

(राजस्थान)

03 8865609

03-10-2007

1417:1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्सन्यूलाईट ज्वैलर्स

85 , जवाहर मार्केट

श्री गंगानगर-335001

(राजस्थान)

04 8866308

03-10-2007

2202 (Part 1 ) : 1999 फ्लश डोर शटर्स

मैसर्स सूरज वुड इण्डस्ट्रीज प्लॉट नं. डी -44 एफ एवं डी-44 जी औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, कालाडेरा जयपुर ( राजस्थान )

8866813

05-10-2007

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्स जयपुर सिल्वर हाउस जी-1-2 , अरिहन्त टावर - II , सांगानेरी गेट , आगरा रोड़ जयपुर-302003 (राजस्थान)

8866914

09-10-2007

2112: 2003 रजत आभूषणों की हालमार्किंग.

मैसर्स जयपुर सिल्वर हाउस जी-1-2 , अरिहन्त टावर - II, सांगानेरी गेट , आगरा रोड़ जयपुर-302 003 (राजस्थान)

8868413

04-10-2007

7098 ( Part 1 ) : 1988 एक्सएलपीई इनसुलेटेड पीवीसी केबल्स

मैसर्स अनामिका कण्डक्टर्स लिमिटेड 4,5,6,10एवं 11 मालवीय औद्यिोगिक क्षेत्र जयपुर-302017 (राजस्थान)

8870194

17-10-2007

2112:2003 रजतआभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्स दीवान ज्वैलर्स शॉप नं. 3 एवं 4 , सनी आर्केड 1888 , तेलीपाडा, चौड़ा रास्ता जयपुर 302 003 (राजस्थान)

09 8870093

16-10-2007

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्स दीवानज्वैलर्स शॉप नं. 3 एवं 4 , सनी आर्केड 1888 , तेलीपाडा, चौड़ा रास्ता जयपुर - 302 003 (राजस्थान)

8872606

24-10-2007

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्स खण्डाका जैन ज्वैलर्स 3-4, हल्दियों का रास्ता जौहरी बाजार जयपुर-302 003 (राजस्थान)

4878G/07-3 9724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

8872303

23-10-2007

14151 ( Part 2 ) : 1999 क्यू सी पी ई पाईप्स

मैसर्स कोठारी पोलीमर्स प्लॉट नं. 13 , औद्योगिक क्षेत्र- II मंगलवार चौराहा , चित्तौडगढ़ (राजस्थान)

8869617

12-10-2007

1786: 1985 एचएसडी स्टील बार्स एण्ड वायर्स

मैसर्स लक्ष्मणवीर स्टील ( प्रा. ) लि. 65-ए, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र झोटवाडा, जयुपर -302012 (राजस्थान)

13 8872808

24-10-2007

14151 ( Part 2 ) : 1999 क्यू सी पी ई पाईप्स

मैसर्स माण्डिया पोलीमर्स प्रा.लि. एन.एच.नं. 11 , नरोदरा लक्ष्मणगढ़ , जिला-सीकर (राजस्थान)

8868514

08-10-2007

4923: 1997 हॉलो स्टील सैक्शन्सफॉर स्ट्रक्चरल यूज

मैसर्स नवभारत ट्यूब्स लिमिटेड 94-डी, औद्योगिक क्षेत्र झोटवाडा, जयुपर -302012 (राजस्थान)

8868312

11-10-2007

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हालमार्किंग

मैसर्स शुभांग ज्वैल्स 50, ग्राउण्डफ्लोर गणपति प्लाजा एम.आई रोड, जयपुर- 302001 ( राजस्थान)

16 8872202

23-10-2007

14151 ( Part 2 ) : 1999 क्यूसी पी ई पाईप्स

मैसर्स सादिया प्लास्टिक इण्डस्ट्रीज एफ-201- सी, माण्डिया रोड पॉवर हाउस के पास पाली मारवाड- 306401 जिला-पाली ( राजस्थान)

8869011

09-10-2007

1554 (Part1 ) : 1988 पीवीसी इन्सुलेटेड (एचडी) केबल्स

मैसर्स वैंकटेशवर वायर्स प्रा.लि. सी-116 (ए-1 ) , रोड नं. 8 विश्वकर्मा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र जयपुर-302013 (राजस्थान)

18 8869112

09-10-2007

7098 ( Part1 ) : 1988 एक्सएलपीई इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी केबल्स

मैसर्स वैंकटेशवर वायर्स प्रा.लि. सी-116 ( ए-1 ) , रोड नं. 8 विश्वकर्मा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र जयपुर-302013 (राजस्थान)

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]

अशोक तलवार , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 6th December , 2007

S.O. 3485. In pursuance of sub- regulation ( 5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification Regulation , 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedules .

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9725

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24,1929

Operative Date SI . No.

LicenceNo. (CM/L-)

SCHEDULE

Name and Address

ofthe Licensee

(1)

(2)

(3) Oct2007

01 .

8864405

29-09-2007 02.

8865508

03-10-2007

Article/Process Covered by the licences and the relevent

IS:Designation

(4)

(5)

8749 : 1988 CID Joints

S.K. Industries ( India) 190.A Industrial area Jhotwara, Jaipur- 302012 Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Hallmarking of GoldJewellery

Vardhman Jewellers

Agersaing Market

Sangaria, Hanumangarh-

335063 Rajasthan

03. 8865609

03-10-2007

141.7: 1999 Hallmarking of GoldJewellery

New Light Jewellers

85 -Jawahar Market

Sri Ganganagar- 335001

Rajasthan

04.

8866308

03-10-2007 05.

8866813

05-10-2007 06. 8866914

09-10-2007 07.

8868413

04-10-2007

2202(Part 1) : 1999 Flush Door Shutters

Suraj Wood Industries Plot No. D -44F & D -44G Industrial Area Kaladera, Jaipur Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Hallma GoldJewellery

Jaipur Silver House G- 1-2 , Arihant Tower- II , Sanganari Gate, Agra Road Jaipur-302003 Rajasthan

2112: 2003 Hallmarking of Silver Jewellery

Jaipur Silver House G-1-2, Arihant Tower - II , Sanganari Gate , Agra Road Jaipur-302003 Rajasthan

7098 (Part 1) : 1988 XLPE Insulated PVC Cables

Anamika Conductors Limited

4,5,6,10& 11

Malviya Industrial Area

Jaipur-302017

Rajasthan

8870194

08 .

17-10-2007 09.

8870093

16-10-2007 10. 8872606

24-10-2007

2112: 2003 Hallmarking of SilverJewellery

Dewan Jewellers Shop No. 3&4, Sunny Arcade 1888 , Teli Para, Chaura Rasta Jaipur-302003 Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Hallmarking of GoldJewellery

Dewan Jewellers Shop No. 3&4, Sunny Arcade 1888 , Teli Para, Chaura Rasta Jaipur-302003 Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Hallmarking of GoldJewellery

Khandaka Jain Jewellers 3-4 Haldiyon Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar Jaipur- 302003 Rajasthan 9726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

(1)

(3) (2)

11 .

8872303

23-10-2007 12. 8869617

12-10-2007 13 .

8872808

24-10-2007 8868514

14.

08-10-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (4)

(5)

14151 (Part2): 1999 QCPE Pipes

Kothari Polymers PlotNo. 13 , Industrial Area - II Mangalwar Choraha Chittorgarh Rajasthan

1786: 1985 HSD Steel Bars & Wires Lakshmanveer Steel (P) Ltd. 65 -A, Industrial Area Jhotwara , Jaipur- 302012 Rajasthan

14151 (Part2): 1999 QCPE Pipes

MandiaPolymers Pvt . Ltd. N.H. No.11 , Narodara Laxmangarh Sikar Rajasthan

4923: 1997 Hollow Steel Sections for Structural use Navbharat Tubes Limited 94-D, Industrial Area Jhotwara , Jaipur-302012 Rajasthan

15. 8868312

11-10-2007

23-10-2007 16. 8872202

17 . 8869011

09-10-2007 18.

09-10-2007 8869112

1417: 1999 Hallmarking of GoldJewellery

Shubhang Jewels 50,Ground Floor , Ganpati Plaza M1 Road , Jaipur- 302001 Rajasthan

14151 (Part 2): 1999 QCPE Pipes

Sadiya Plastic Industries F-201 -C, Mandia Road Near Power House , PaliMarwar Pali -306401 Rajasthan

1554 ( Part 1) : 1988 PVC Insulated (HD) Cables Venkateshwara Wires Pvt . Ltd. C- 116(A- 1 ) , RoadNo. 08 V.K.1 . Area, Jaipur -302013 Rajasthan

7098 (Part 1 ): 1988 XLPE Insulated PVC Cables Venkateshwara Wires Pvt . Ltd. C- 116 (A- 1 ), Road No. 08 V.K.I. Area, Jaipur-302013 Rajasthan

[No.CMD/13: 11 ] A.K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks )

पेट्रोलियम एवं प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 10 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3486.- तेल उद्योग ( विकास ) अधिनियम , 1974 ( 1974 का 47 ) की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( ड ) द्वारा प्रदत्त की गई शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा श्री अरूण कुमार , सी एस एस ( 1975 ) , को दिनांक 5-12-2007 से पांच साल की अवधि के लिए, या उनके सेवानिवृत्त होने तक या अगले आदेश जारी होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , तेल उद्योग विकास बोर्ड का सचिव नियुक्त करती है।

[सं. जी -35012/3/07- वित्त- II ] एस.सी. दास , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 10th December , 2007

S.O. 3486.-In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( e) of sub - section (3 ) of Section 3 of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974 (47 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Arun Kumar , CSS ( 1975 ) as Secretary , OilIndustry Development Board with effect from 5-12-2007 for a period of five years or till date of his superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[No.G-35012/3/07 -Fin.II ] S. C. DAS , Under Secy.

9727

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3487.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर . शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं.3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा - 391 320 (गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: गुजरात

जिला : वडोदरा

तालुका: वडोदरा

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं .

गाँव का नाम

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

242

आसोज

[फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [

9728

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2007

S S. O. 3487.- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products frorn Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the Purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No. 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar , Vadodara - 391320 (Gujarat)

Schedule

State:-Gujarat

District:-Vadodara

Tehsil: -Vadodara

Area

Survey No/ Block No Sub- Division No.

Name of Village

Hectare Are Centiare

03 40

242

Asaj

[F. No. R-25011/5/2006- O.R. - I ]

S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9729

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3488.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं :

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर . शाह, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं.3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा 391 320 (गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : पंचमहल

तालुका : गोधरा

गाँव का नाम सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं. उप खण्ड सं .

311

गोलाव

310

324

266

265

270

448

449

538

522

644

643

642

P राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

93 0

20 0

33 0

12 0

67 0

64.

35 0

20 9730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA24 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] 2

643

गौलाव (हजारी...)

635

632

629

628

665

Old173P

223

दहीकोट

Old172/3

229

218

Old162

Old156/3

211

Old155

209

Old47P

70P

47/1P

70P

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2006- ओ.आर. - 1] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3488. whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No. 3/122, Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 ( Gujarat ) 9731 [भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007 ग्रहायण 24 , 1929

Schedule

Tehsil : -Godhara

District: -Panchamahal

State:-Gujarat

Area

Sub- Division No.

Survey No/Block No

Name ofVillage

Centiare

Hectare Are

311

Gollav

310

324

266

26:5

265

26:5

270

448

449

538

522

644

643

642

643

635

632

62.9

628

665

Dahikot

233

Old173P

229

Old172/3

218

Old162

211

Old156/3

209

Old155

70P

Old47P

70P

47/1P

[F. No. R-25011 /7 /2006 -O.R. - 1 ]

S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy. 4878G1/07-4 [PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii)) 9732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2007/ AGRAHAYANA24, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3489.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए:

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं:

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर. शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं .3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा 391 320 ( गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहल

राज्य: गुजरात

तालुका: कालोल

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव कानाम सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं . उप खण्ड सं .

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

111

माधवास

166

170

101

166

211

211+191+193

P1+ P2, P1,1P

212

1+P2

236

P1+P2

269

313

जेतपुर

313

308

P1/ 1

308

294

P [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9733

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

109

P जेतपुर निरन्तर

109

P/1

109

108

119

125

294

129

153

143

147

1P कंडाच

451

294

295

620

621

2,1

622

2P4

622

1P,2

623

624

625

628

623

P उतरेडिया

1+2

2+3

102

146

136

1 व्यासडा

1194

1458

भुखी

116

P33 P

113

112

125

2 4

01 89

40 9734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

फन्सी

1PPlot20

330

करोली .

330

1P/21/2

330

1P/21/3

330

1-21/1/7

330

1PPlot164

330

1P1

308

309

313

330

320

321

330

1Plot226

330

plot12

330

256

2/1P2

255

22/1

330

23/1

330

7/3

330

5/2

330

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

13 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9735

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण, 24, 1929

330

80 करोली निरंतर...

3:30

P/18/2

3:30

P/18/2

अदादरा

8:35

801

2 3

802

[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2006-ओ.आर. -1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3489.- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the Purpose of laying thesaid pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act, as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs. No. 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 ( Gujarat ) 9736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

Schedule

Tehsil: -Kalol

District:-Panchamahal

State:-Gujarat

Area

Survey No/Block No Sub -Division No.

Name of Village

Centiare

Are

Hectare

Madhvas

111

166

170

101

166

211

P1+ P2 , P1,1P

211+191 +193

212

1+ P2

236

P1+ P2

269

313

Jetpur

313

308

P1/1

308

294

109

108

119

125

294

129

153

143

147

77 Kandach

451

294 [ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9737

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

3 1

:295

Kandach Con ..

295

620

621

2,1

622

2P4

1P2

622

623

624

625

628

623

1+2

44.

Utarediya

2+3

102

146

136

1194

Vyasda

1458

Bhukhi

116

113

3P334

112

125

2 Fansi

42 3

330

Karoli

Plot20

330

1P21/2

330

1P21/3

330

6 4

94 0

16 0

44 0

56 0

72 0

80 0

96 0

32 0

02 0

08 0

58 0

12 0

10 0

49 0

40 0

08 0

41 0

68 0

10 0

89 0

81 0

62 0

14 0

79 0

24 0

1-21/1/7

330

77 0

1PPlot164

330

1P 0

36 08

84 0

98 9738

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA24, 1929

3 1

330

Karoli Con ..

330

1P1

308

309

313

330

320

321

330

1Plot226

330

plot12

330

256

2/1P2

255

330

22/1

23/1

330

7/3

330

5/2

330

P/18/ 2

P/18/2

330

Adadara

92 0

76 0

10 0

86 0

94 0

44 0

46 0

54 0

86 0

64 0

76 0

60 0

30 0

26 0

40 0

28 0

54 0

12 0

66 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9739

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

Adadara Con ...

835

801

802

40 3

80 2

0 00-

[ F. No. R -25011/7 /2006- O.R. -I ] S.K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3490.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं ;

कोई व्यक्त्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर. शाह, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं .3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा 391 320 (गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहल तालुका: हालोल

सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं .

गाँव कानाम

2354

कंजरी (चन्द्रपुरा)

2344

2345

209

208

_2317+2316 4878G1/07-5

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

एयर वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर

29 88

215/1+ 2

203P/1

214/1+2+3+4

P [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

9740

2316+2317

2355

216/1

कंठारी (चन्द्रपुरा) जारी

216

224

2356

P/235/2

2360

242/2

2365

225

1495

232

233

मुवाला

2+2

106

1+P2

102

111

2+1

108

1+2+3

109

[फा. सं. आर-25011/ 7/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3490.- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

ery Township . P.O.

Ga...

9741 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

Schedule

Tehsil: -Halol

District:-Panchamahal

State :-Gujarat

Nameof Village

Survey No/Block No Sub- Division No.

Hectare

Area Are Centiare 1

2354

2.9

215/1+2

88 Kanjari(Chandrapura )

2344

203P/1

2345

214/1+ 2+3+4

209

208

2317+2316

2316+2317

2355

216/1

216

2356

224

2360

P/235/2

2365

242/2

225

232

1495

233

Muwala

106

2+2

102

1+P2

111

108

2+1

29 88

109

1+2+3

43 68

[F. No. R-25011/7/2006- O.R. -I ]

S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3491.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं :

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर . शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं .3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा - 391 320 (गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9742

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

अनुसूची

जिला: वडोदरा

तालुका : सावली

गाँव का नाम सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं. उप खण्ड सं.

3 1

714

पिलोल

1136

131

1276

ईन्द्राल

1276

775

535

1239

2 भेमार

539

536

559

610

114

2P वडदला

142+141

140

136

6 अदलवडा

182

137

लोटना

188

हरीपुरा

163

164

161

331

मुढेला

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

6 4

54 0

17 0

80 0

48 0

73 0

93 0

18 0

03 0

98 0

38 0

60 0

64 0

24 0

50 0

81 0

64 0

12 0

00 0

18 0

[फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2006- ओ.आर. -1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S S. O. 3491 .-- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

9743

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50of 1962) , the ( entral Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No. 3/122, Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 ( Gujarat )

Tehsil :-Savali District:-Vadodara Name of Village Survey No/Block No

714 Pillol

1136

131 Indral

1276

775

535

1239

539 Vemar

536

559

610

Vadadla

114

142+141

140

136

182 Adalyada

182

137 Lotna

Schedule

State:-Gujarat

Area

Sub-Division No.

Hectare Are Centiare

6 3

48 4

80 2.

93 2

19 P

18 2

03 1

98 2P

38 P

10 23

08:

64.

9744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 / AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3 (if) ] =

188

Haripura

163

00 164

90 161

84 Mudhela

331

[F. No. R-25011/5/2006-O.R. -I ] S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3492.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए:

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर . शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मकान नं .3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा 391 320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 9745

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूचा

जिला: दाहोद

तालुका: लिमखेडा

गाँव कानाम सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं . उप खण्ड सं .

खुंदा

172

P19

1 खीरखाई

2P3

235

236

165

1P1

165

P31

P3 वलुंदी

P58

पोलीसीमल

P11

47/20

P6 कंबोई

P14/1

P40/7

P18P/1

P7/3

P/7 /1P2

56/P1 राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

92 9746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 / AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

P80P1+2

कंबोई निरंतर

P/75P

P8P1

P/79

[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3492.- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the Purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No. 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.Ο. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 ( Gujarat ) 9747 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Schedule

District:-Dahod

State:-Gujarat

Tehsil : -Limekheda

Area

Name of Village

Survey No / Block No Sub-Division No.

Centiare

Are

Hectare

Kundha

172

88.

44.

P19

Khirkhai

2P3

14.

235

236

165

1P1

165

P31

Valundi

P58

Polisinal

P11

47/20

Kamboi

P14/1

P40/7

P18P/1

P7/3

P/7/1P2

56/P1

4878G1/07-6 9748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929 [PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1

Kamboi Con ...

P80P1 +2

P/75P

P8P1

P/79

[ F. No. R -25011/6/2006 -O.R. -I ] S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3493.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं :

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर . शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं.3/122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा 391 320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पंचमहल

राज्य: गुजरात

तालुका: घोघंबा

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

उप खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं .

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

दमवाव

2/1

115

118

1P9

1P16

91 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

181

सेमालीया

699

6:99

699

199

108

699

651

652

703

708

702

699

P35

699

144

140

9749

20 0

۱۰

50 0

30 0

98 0

0 9750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2007/ AGRAHAYANA24 , 1929

140

P सेमालीया निरंतर ...

140

100

5PP

खिलोडी

...-

159

158

12421 1

158

169

147

3P4

146

159

137

खिलोडी निरंतर ...

137

138

24321PP-

139

140

123

P2AP

122

121

शेरपुरा

PPPPPP-

2P241

189

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 0

62 0

96 0

66 0

12 0

66 0

85 0

76 0

50 0

84 0

86.

76 0

02 0

40 0

08 0

40 0

30 0

00 0

28 0

35 0

47 C

70 0

91 0

80 0

44 0

12 0

58 0

17 0

25 0

78 0

76 0

96 0

82. 0

00 0

24 0

01 [फा. सं. आर-25011/ 7/2006-ओ.आर. -1 ] एस . के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 9751 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3493.-whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs. No. 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 (Gujarat)

Schedule

State:-Gujarat

District: -Panchamahal

Tehsil: -Ghoghamba

Area

Sub - Division No.

Survey No /Block No

Nameof Village

Centiare

Are

Hectare

Damvav

2/1

115

118

1P9

1P16

181

Semaliya

699

P P

699

699 9752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

699

Semaliya Con...

699

3 P

108

699

651

652

703

708

702

699

P35

699

144

140

100

Khilodi

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 4

5 6

74. 0

74 [भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9753

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

3 Khilodi Con..

159

158

169

147

146

159

137

138

4424321PP-

139

140

140 P2AP

123

122

121

Sherpura

PPPPPP

189

2P2416

189

76 0

50 0

42 0

76 0

58 0

02 0

08 0

[F. No. R-25011 /7/2006 -O.R. -I ] S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

'नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3494.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्त्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

9754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA24, 1929

===

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर. शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं .3/ 122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा 391 320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : दाहोद तालुका: दाहोद

गाँव का नाम सर्वेक्षण सं . खण्ड सं .

रामपुरा

59 कालीतलाई

139 बोरवानी

301 खरोड

301

301 खेरेडी

120

117

122

123

124

134

133

132

131

203

204

206

208

209

210

211

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

5A3

08 106P

104

73 101P

59 P

10 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9755

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

124

नानीराणापुर

131

128

132

133

नवागाम

377

263

284

319

392

391

399

413

432

431

FP P तानाचीया

राचरडा

266

भाटीवाडा

137

141

142

143

152

153

उदार

2/14

2/13 4878G1/07-7

6 4

04 0

02 0

10 0

19 0

07 0

78 0

26 0

25 0

48 0

38 0

67 0

98 0

14 0

80 0

19 0

40 0

[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 1 9756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

[PART I1 SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3494.- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the Purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt . Asha R Shah , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No. 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 ( Gujarat)

Tehsil : -Dahod

District:-Dahod Name of Village Survey No/Block No 1

Rampura

Kalitalai

59 Borwani

139

301 Kharod

301

78 Kheredi

120

117

122

123

124

134

133

132

131 Schedule

State: -Gujarat

Area

Sub - Division No.

Centiare Hectare Are

5A3

106P

49 104

101P

14 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9757

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

-3

203

Kheredi ( Con...)

204

206

208

209

210

211

124

Naniranapur

131

1.28

132

1:33

377

Navagam

263

284

319

392

391

399

413

432

431

Tanachiya

226

Racharda

137

Bhatiwada

141

142

14.3

152

153

Udar

2/14

2/13

6 0

26 0

74 0

29 0

73 0

37 0

36 0

02 0

25 0

10 0

98 0

84 0

78 0

03 0

26 0

12 0

15 0

48 0

67 0

14 0

47 0

80 0

49 0

40 0

06 0

[F. No. R -25011/6/2006-O.R. - I ] S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 9758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3495.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाउन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए :

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैं :

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूचि में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध हैं , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्रीमती आशा आर . शाह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मकान नं .3/122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ओ. जवाहरनगर , वडोदरा - 391 320 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : दाहोद

राज्य: गुजरात

तालुका: बारिया

क्षेत्रफल

उप खण्ड सं .

गाँव का नाम सर्वेक्षण सं. खण्ड सं.

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

192

मोतीझरी

1+2

234

पिपलोद

240

582

571

पन्चेला

नागुडी

[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2006- ओ.आर. - 1]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 9759

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3495.- whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the Public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Koyali to Ratlam in the State of Gujarat , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of sectiori 3 of the said Act, as Published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general Public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Asha R Shah , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , at office Qtrs . No. 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Vadodara - 391320 (Gujarat )

Schedule

State:-Gujarat

District: -Dahod

Tehsil: -Bariya

Area

Name of Village

Sub - Division No.

Survey No / Block No

Centiare

Are

Hectare

192

MotiZari

1+2

234

Piplod

240

582

571

Panchela

Nathudi

[F. No. R-25011/6/2006- O.R. -I ]

S.K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

9760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 20 नवम्बर, 2007

its Order No. L - 12012/ 236 / 95 / 1.R . ( B - I ) dated 3-3-97 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:-

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in discharging Shri Subhash Kapoor clerk , from service w.e.f. 16-7-93 and stoppage of pension isjust, fair and legal ? If not what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

का. आ. 3496 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ संख्या -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 38/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/236/1995- आई. आर. (बी -1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 20th November, 2007

S.O. 3496 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 38/1999 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 20-11-2007.

[No. L- 12012/236/ 1995 - IR (B - I ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT NO . 1 NEW DELHI

I.D. NO . 38/99

In the matter of dispute between :--

Workman

Shri Subhash Kapoor, S/o Late Shri Santoshi Lal Kapoor Through The Circle President, S.B.I. Staff Association , Hari Singh Nalwal Street No.58 , Karol Bagh.

Versus

The General Manager ( Planning) ,

State Bank of India , LocalHeadOffice , 11 , Sansad Marg , New Delhi - 110001 .

Management

2. Brif facts of this case as culled from record are that the workman Shri Subhash Kapoor was appointed on 8-1-1970 as Clerk and was discharged from service w.e.f. 16-7-93 after putting total service of 23 years 6 months and 8 days . The service conditions of the Award Staff of the respondent ( including clerical cadre staff) are governed by the Sastry Award as modified by the Desai Award and subsequent Bipartite Settlements . The workman was working as Clerk in the bank at Organisational Planning Department , New Delhi , Local Head Office . His wife was running a Video Library at her residence . The police allegedly seized some alleged obscence material from the Video Library and the Police wanted to take into custody the workman's wife . To avoid social stigma and under pressure from his relations he admitted alleged guilt of running the library to save his wife from the clutches of law. The workman was released on probation by the court of Shri Rakesh Garg , M.M. , Patiala House , New Delhi on 17-7-92 under Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act , 1958. The workman duly informed the bank that he was released on probation by the court . The Bank ignoring the provisions of S. 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act issued a show cause notice to the workman vide its letter No. 1620 dated 26-11-92 as to why he should not be dismissedfrom Bank Service with immediate effect under Section 520/521 ( 2) ( b ) of the Sastry Award , relevant provisions of the Desai Award and other agreements applicable to Award Staff and also in terms of Section 10 (1 ) (b) ( i ) of Banking Regulation Act 1949. He submitted his reply to the notice vide letter dated 31-12-92 but he was proceeded departmentally and illegally discharged from service w.e.f. 16-7-93 with stoppage of pension vide order dated 14-10-93 by Disciplinary Authority without holding proper enquriywhich punishment was confirmed in appeal . The dismissal order was illegal and contrary to the proviosions of the Sastry Award , Desai Award, Bipartite Settlement and relevant rules and it was passed without taking into consideration the fact that he was released on probation under section 12 of Probation of Offenders Act . He thus sought the quashment of order dated 14-10-93 discharging him from service with reinstatement and consequential benefits etc.

Appearances : Shri S.K.Patni A/R for workman Shri Anil Kumar Beheti , Law Officer

3. Claim has been contested by the management justifying the action of the bank as legal .

for management .

AWARD

4. Written statement was followed by rejoinder wherein controverted facts of the written statement were refuted and those of the claim statement were reiterated to The Central Government in Ministry of Labour vide 9761 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/ अग्रहायण 24, 1929

be correct .

5. Thereafter evidence of the parties were adduced. Shri T.D. Arora, Assistant General Manager State Bank of India Office Admn . Deptt . was examined on behalf of the management as MWI and workman examined himself as WWI in support of his case .

6.After close of evidence Sh S.K. Patni A/R for the wrokman and Shri Anil Kumar A/R for the management addressed arguments and also filed writter submissions with citations .

afforded to the workman is very harsh and he has been deprived of his pension despite the fact that he has put in 23 years of service . Taking into consideration the fact that theworkman has put in 23 years of service , punishment of depriving him of the pension appears to be harsh . Hence interest ofjustice will be met if the punishment ofdischarge isaltered and lenient: view is taken in the matter of stopage of pension only . It would be proper if the workman is compulsorily retired from service with benefits ofpension.It is ordered accordingly and Award is thus passed . File be consigned to record room.

SANT SINGH BAL, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 20 नवम्बर , 2007

7. A/R for the workman contended that the action of the bank in illegal and unjustifed and his releasing on probation should be taken into account to reinstate him in service with full back wages and the punishment is also veryharsh. He has also challenged the order of punishment as harsh and disproportionate in the facts and circuinstances of the case .

8. A/R of the management refuted the above contentions justifying discharge of the workman from service in the background of confession of his guilt before the Criminal Court requiring no regular enquiry.

का. आ. 3497 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी. डब्ल्यू.डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 61/94) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -42012/ 187/ 93- आई.आर. ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिह, डेस्क अधिकारी 9. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the contentions raised on either sides and persued the record meticulously.

NewDelhi , the 20th November , 2007

S.O. 3497 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 61/94) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workmen which wasreceived by the Central Government on 20-11-2007 .

10. In the instant case it is admitted fact that the claimant himself confessed the fact before the Criminal court that he owned the video library containing obscene cassette etc. which amounted to an offence of section 292 I.P.C. and on his confession he was convicted and released on probation under section 12 of probation of offenders Act . In view of confession of his guilt , his contention that no regular enquiry was conducted by the disciplinary authority and the punishment of moral turpitude on the basis of his admission is illegal is of no value .

[No. L-42012/ 187/93 - IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, NO . 1

NEW DELH

I.D. NO. 61/94

In the matter of dispute between :-

Smt . Savitri Devi , House No. 5/61 , Trilok Puri , Delhi- 110092 .

Workman

Versus

Central Public Works Department Through Executive Engineer ( Elect . )

K.Division , CPWD ,

Indraprastha Estate ,

New Delhi - 110002 .

...Management

Appearances :None

11. As regards his contention that no departmental enquiry was required to be conducted for misconduct in view of his release on probation by the criminal court it may be pointed out that this contention is not tenable in view ofthe decision ofthe Supreme Court reported in U.O.1 Vs. Bakshi Ram 1990 Supreme Court Cases page 426 wherein itwas held that the release of a person under section 12 of probation of offenders Act does not preclude department from taking action for misconduct leading to the offence or his conviction thereon as per law. This Section was not intended to exhonerate the person from departmental punishment. It only directs that the offender shall not suffer disqualification , if any , attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law. Release of a Government servant on probation under section 12 of the Probation ofOffenders Actby the Criminal Court deos not grant him any protection against being proceeded departmentally for his misconduct . In view of the above discussion taking into consideration the facts and circustances of the above case I am of the opinion that the retention of the workman in service will not be proper and action of the management is just, proper and legal .

12. I have also heard the A/R for the workman on the point ofpunishment . It has been urged that the punishment 9762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

AWARD

The Central Government , in the Ministry of Labour videits Order No. L- 12012/ 187/93 - I.R. ( DU) dated 5-5-94 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication :-

"Whether the action of Executive Engineer , ' K ' Division , C.P. W.D. and Canteen Manager CPWD, 'Y' Shape Building New Delhi in terminating the services of Smt . Savitri Devi , Bearer of CPWD departmental canteen w.e.f. 1-2-93 is justified ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ? " 2.After completion of pleadings and evidence of the parties case was adjourned for filing of written arguments by the parties on 20-5-97 and till today none is appearing for the workman Smt. Savitri Devi she last appeared in this case on 9-3-2001 . Thereafter neither workman nor anybody on her behalf appeared on 21-5-2001.21-5-2001 , 14-8-2001 , 19-10-2001 , 15-1-2002, 18-4-2002 , 3-9-2002 , 3-12-2002 , 3-3-2003, 22-5-2003 , 5-8-2003 , 17-11-2003 , 5-2-2003 , 27-4-2004, 29-7-2004, 19-10-2004, 25-1-05 , 20-4-06,29-6-05, 21-9-2005 , 26-12-05 , 21-3-06 , 8-6-06 , 19-9-06 , 27-9-06 , 22-11-06, 31-1-07, 22-3-07, 30-7-07, and today on 30-10-07 also none is present for the parties . Hence No Dispute Award is passed in this case . File be consigned to record room.

Dt. 5-11-07

SANT SINGH BAL, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3498 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिकं विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. -1 चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 20/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -41011/53/ 2004- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2007 S.O. 3498.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2007) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , I Chandigharh , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern Railway, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007 .

[No. L-41011 /53 /2004 - IR ( B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 20/2007

1. Sh . H. K. Sharma Secretary, Uttariya Rialway Karamchari Union , EF- 430 , Krishan Nagar , N. G. Road Jalandhar (Punjab).

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

2. The General Secrtary, All India French Bank Employees' Co-ordination Committee , C/ o Banque Nationale De Paris , French Bank Building , 62 , Homji Street , Fort , Mumbai- 400001.

.. Applicant

Versus

1. The General Manager , Northern Railway, Baroda House , NewDelhi .

2. The Divisional Manager, Northern Railway, Ferozepur . 3. The Head HR, BNP Paribas French Bank Building , 62 , Homji Street- Fort, Mumbai -400001.

Respondent APPEARANCES

None.

Shri N. K. Zakhmi .

For the Workmen : For the Management :

AWARD

Passed on 16-10-2007

Central Govt , vide notification No. L -41011 /53/2004/ IR(B. 1. ) dated 14-2-2007 has referred the following dispute to his Tribunał for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Railways in not placing 15 employees (List enclosed) inthe grade of Rs . 1400-2300 w.e.f. 1-3-93 i.e. date of restructuring of their cadre is just and legal ? If not , to what relief these workers are entitled to and from which date ? "

2. Case repeatedly called. None has put up appearances on behalf of the Union i.e. H.K. Sharma , Secretary , Uttariya Railway Karamchari Union and the General Secretary . All India French Bank Employees Coordination Committee who raised the demand despite notices for 28-5-07 , 10-7-07 , 23-8-07 and for 27-9-07 through Regd, notices as well as simple notice , and none has put up appearances on behalf of the Union for today also . It appears that Union is not interested to pursue with the present reference . In view of the above , the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . for want of prosecution. Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh 16-10-07

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3499 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडियां के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 110/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/33/2005- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2007

S.O. 3499.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 110/2005 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court , Jabalpur , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007.

[No. L- 12012/33/2005 - IR ( B - 1 )] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer 9763 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/ अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT /LC/ R/ 110/05

(Ref. No. 128/2001 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007 .

Presiding Officer

: Shri C. M. Singh

[No. L-41012/52/2001 /-IR(B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer TheGeneral Secretary,

Daily Wages Bank Employees Association,

ANNEXURE

9, Sanwar Road, Ujjain (MP)

.Workman/Union

Ujjain.

Versus

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

The Deputy General Manager ,

NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 128/01 .

State Bank of India,

Presiding Officer Shri C. M. Singh

Zonal Office , Hamidia Road ,

Bhopal(MP),

Shri Roop Singh Dalla ,

Bhopal.

Management

AWARD

Rly.Qtr.No. 1572 , Road No.14, Rly.Colony,

Workman/Union

Ratlam(MP)

Passed on this 31st day of October , 2007

Versus

The Divisional RailwayManager ,

Western Railway,

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No.L - 12012/33/2005 - IR( B- I ) dated 29/9/05 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunai:

Near Railway Station ,

Management

Ratlam (MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of November , 2007 "Whether the action of the management of Dy. General Manager , State Bank of India in terminating the services of Sh . Indraraj Singh Baakriaya w.e.f. 16-10-99 and not regularizing him isjustified? Ifnot, towhat reliefworkman is entitled for ?"

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notificatiori No.L- 41012/ 52/2001 ( IR- B - 1 ) dated 28-7-01 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

2. Shri R. Nagwanshi , General Secretary, Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karnachari Sangathan , Ujjain ( MP) has moved application No.5 with the prayer that No Dispute Award be passed in this case.

3. In this case, the management has not put in appearance inspite of issuing notice to management.

"Whether the action of the management of DRM, Western Railway, Ratlam in not giving the regular appointment to Shri Roop Singh even after empanelment is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for? "

2. Vide order dated 30-10-07 passed on the order sheet of this reference, the reference proceeded exparte against the workman . The workman did not file any state- mentofclaim .

4. The reference order reveals that this reference has been instituted on the initiation of the General Secretary, Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Employees Association , 9 , Sanwar Road , Ujjain(MP) . Now the said General Secretary does not press the reference and requested in writing for passing no dispute award.

5. In view of the above , no dispute awarci is passed without any orders as to costs .

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर , 2007

3.On 2-11-07, the date fixed for filing Written State- ment by the management , no body put in appearance for the management and thus the management has failed to file the WS . Under the circumstances , this tribunal was left with no alternative but to close the reference for award and accordingly the reference was , therefore , closed for award.

का. आ. 3500 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्ट्रन।

4. It is a case without pleadings of the parties and evidence of the parties . Therefore the case deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the work- man without any orders as to costs .

रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 128/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -41012/52/2001- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 23rd November , 2007

5. In view ofthe above , the reference is decided in favour of the management and against the workman with- out any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of DRM , Western Railway, Ratlam in not giv- ing the regular appointment to Shri Roop Singh even after empanelment isjustified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govern- ment of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

S.O. 3500 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer 4878G107-8 9764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

APPEARANCES

नई दिल्ली , 23 नवम्बर , 2007

Forthe Employer:

Mr. Shridhar Poojary , Advocate

For the Workmen:

Ms. Kunda N. Samant , Advocate .

Mumbai , dated 4th October , 2007

Ref.CGIT 2/91 of 2002 का. आ. 3501 :-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यू इंडिया कोपरेटिव बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

AWARD

[सं. एल -12012/286/2002- आई. आर. ( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

Matrix of the facts as culled out from the reference are as under :

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2007

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , by its Order L - 12012 /286 /2002 [ IR( B - I ) ] dated 18-12-2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - sectioh 2(A) of Section 10 of the In- dustrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

S.O. 3501 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 91/2002) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 2 , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of New India Co-operative Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received bythe Central Government on 23-11-2007.

"Whether the action of the management of New In- diaCooperative Bank , Mumbai by orally terminating the services of Shri Prakash Dalvi w.e.f. 17-08-1999 is justified ? If not, what relief the workman Shri Prakash Dalvi is entitled to ?"

[No. L- 12012/286 /2002- IR (B - I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL TRIBUNAL No.2 , MUMBAI

PRESENT

A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT -2/91 of 2002

2. Claim statement is filed at Ex -7 in support of the demand by the concerned workman making out case that , initially he was appointed as a Peon on 16-01-1982 . He was attending all sort of outside work connected with first party Bank . He was also doing work of maintaining record of signature of Savings slips . He was visiting the taxi men's union to collect the cheques of deposits and was stitching the bunches of vouchers , stapling it as well as doing dis- patching work . He worked upto 22-09-1984 in that fashion from 16-01-1982 .

Employers in Relation to the Management of New India Co-Operative Bank Limited

The General Manager ( Personnel ) New India Co-operative Bank Ltd. 241/243 , P. D Mello Road

Fort, Mumbai -400001 .

AND

Their Workmen

3.On 22-9-84 when he left for work of first party to board train at Byculla Station , he sustained injury. Said accident took place when he was in the employment of first party. That time he was proceeding to RBI regarding work ofthe first party . He was admitted in Saba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital by Railway Authority. In the operation , his lower portion below left knee was removed. Railway authority gave Rs . 60,000 /-as compensation . However no steps were taken by first party to award compensation or to enquire abouthis position . He tried to contact first party through leader of Union and requested atleast to take any of his family member on Compassionate ground . However , it wasnot considered by the Bank .

4. He resumed on duty after the accident and he was transferred from various places including Andheri , Goregaon , Bandra , still he performed his duties which were assigned to him and like that he worked for 16 years.

Shri Prakash Dalvi , 'B' Wing, Vaibhav Apartments , Bhandar Galli , L.J. Road , Mahim, Mumbai 400016 .

5. From 22-11-98 he suffered from diabetics and was admitted in Radhabhai Waturmal Hospital . Dr. Vivek N.

9765 [ 'भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

party and as a result of that , prayer of second party subsist to consider as far as his claim regarding re - employment or treating him as employee from 17-8-99 till he died subsist .

10. In view of above pleadings , my learned Prede- cessors framed issues at Ex- 15 which I answer against it as follows:

Issues

Findings Allahabadla was giving treatment when he was in the hospital and due to mistake of Ward boy, concerned work- man fell down while he was shifted and as such , suffered injury in right leg which was operated and was takingtreat- ment on it upto July 1999. For that , he sent medical certifi- cate to first party to regularise his leave from 22-11-98 till hewas declared fit i.e. , June 1999. However his leave was not consideredthough salary was paid upto June 1999.

i. Whether the workman proves that he was re- trenched without following the provisions of Section 25 F ofthe Industrial Disputes Act . Yes.

ii . Whether the action of the management of New India Co-operative Bank, Mumbai by terminating the services of Shri Prakash Dalvi w.e.f. 17-8-99 ontheground of continued ill health is justified? No.

iii. What relief the workman is entitled to? Heirs of second party are entitled for existing wages of deceased workman at the rate ofthe time of termi- nation i.e. on 17-08-1999 , w.e.f. 17-08-1999 till 23-01-2007.

6. As a result of said accident, he was in depressed state ofmind . He wrote letter to Chairman to take any other member of his family on compassionate ground mention- ing name of wife who was educated upto 8th std. However it was not considered by Bank and Chairman of it . He was called before Panel of Doctors ofthe first party. He faced it. However he was declared unfit and first party decided to terminate his services on that ground w.e.f. 17-08-1999 . According to second party , he was fit to attend the work which was assigned to him. Even Doctor declared him fit . He was 44 years old and 14 years were at his credit to serve . Bank did not consider it and disciplinary authority decided to terninate his services on medical ground with- out following due process of law or by giving retirement compensation and other legal dues . So it is prayed that, decision taken by first party w.e.f. 17-8-99 be declared not just and proper and direct first party to reinstate him with backwages and continuity of service .

iv. Whether the workman proves that he is able to perform the same duties performed by him since 1984 to November 1998 ? Does not survive . REASONS

Issue Nos : 1 , 2 & 3 :

7. During the pendency of the reference , second party workman died on 23-01-2007 . By purshis Ex-42 heirs of second party prayed to bring their name in place of deceased workman to claim legal dues .

11. Deceased second party workman claims that , he was ferminated without following due process of law though he was admittedly disabled person . According to second party, after meeting with the accident he reported onduty and was doing work assigned to him. As far as working on the post even after accident and doing duties assigned to him are concerned , there is not dispute about it. Bank has raised dispute about his ability of work after he met with accident second time when he was taking treatment on diabetics from Dr. Allahabadia i.e. till he fell down while he was shifted by the ward boy on 22-11-98 . As far as physical condition of second party is con- cerned and work assigned to him after he met with railway accident till the period of22-11-98 is concerned , there was no any serious dispute . It is admitted position that , deceased workman joined on 16-01-1982 and met with Railway accident on 22-09-1984 and even thereafter he was there in the employment of first party and was attending dutiesassigned to him till 22-11-1998 .

8. This claim is disputed by first party by filing reply Ex-8 making out case that, concerned workman was not fit to continue since he lost his ability of work when he met with the accident . Even he was on continuous leave on medicalground which reveals that he is not fit . Even Doc- tor opined that his disability is 60% which does not permit such a person to declare fit to work. When he is not fit, question of following provisions of Industrial Disputes Act does not arise since said termination does not fall urider Section 2 ( 00) of Industrial Disputes Act. It is stated that, prayer prayed by concerned workman to take his wife onemployment on compassionate ground has no any base. There is not settlement between first party and Union to consider such claim . Even Bank informed accordingly. It is denied that, decision taken by first party of retrenching second party on medical ground is not just and proper . According to first party, relying on the opinion ofthe panel ofdoctorsto examine second party and declare workman unfitand observing 60% disability was base behind termi- nation and decision was taken on it is just and proper and does not require interference.

13. The say of the deceased workman is that , even aftermeeting with accident 2nd time, while he was taking treatment on diabetics , he was recovered and was fit to work.However first party decided to terminate his employ- 9. As far as bringing legal heirs on record ofde- ceased workman is concerned, it is not disputed by first 9766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

RamaswamyMurugesh Vrs . S.G. Bhosale , the then Presid- ingOfficer , 5th Labour Court & Anr observed that, ifwork- man is suffering from continuous ill health and there was evidence on that point , there is no illegality In upholding the decision of termination . However in the said case also workman involved in that case was absent for number of days and produced medical certificate . He was on leave on ground of illness issuing medical certificates and was asked to visit after 15 days . Then he was asked to show improve- ment in his work and when it was seen no improvement in work , he was terminated . In case at hand no such oppprtunity was given to second party workman and action taken on presumption was not an action taken in case of Ramaswamy which was upheld by Hon'ble Bombay High Court . The Citation published in 1999 I CLR 780 re- ferredwhere again Bombay High Court while deciding case ofCeat Ltd. Vrs . observed that , the award given by Labour Court suffered from serious infirmity on account of invok- ing a non.existent concept . For example termination only on ill health which is not a law . However in that case also workman involved remained absent for number of days , was asked to report on duty then charge sheet was served , explanation was sought and then decision was taken. Whereas in the instant case , no such opportunity was given to workman .

14. So ifwe considered all this, coupled with discus- sions made above, I conclude that , no opportunity was given to concerned workman to show his ability which required to give . No charge sheet was served . No inquiry wasconduced . Employer sits on the opinion of panel Doc- tors as evidence and decided to terminate services of sec- ond party which is not just , proper and require to quash .

15. Second party was terminated on 17-08-1999. without following due process of law. As per purshis Ex -42 he died on 23-01-2007 . It is to be noted that , he was of 44 years when he was terminated . So definitely I have to ob- serve that he was fit to work till 23-01-2007 and entitledto getbenefits of backwages presuming that , he was eligible to work and presuming that , he worked for the Banktill his death i.e. 23-01-2007 as a result of that, his legal heirs are entitled to get salary of the deceased workman from 17-08- 1999 with all benefits available to that post from 17-08-1999 to 23-01-2007 .

16. It is to be noted that , this second party workman died on 23-01-2007 , so question of his reinstatement does not arise . Besides , prayer prayed by concemed workman to take his legal heirs in the employment on compassionate ground is also not proved by reproducing any settlement which took place between union and first party. That means second party has to establish the right of heirs of deceased who can claim employment on compassionate ground. It is matter of record that , no any compensation was given by firstparty to the concerned workman when he met with an ment relying on the opinion of Panel Doctors which is not just and proper . To support that, second party's advocate place reliance on the citation published in 1992 II LLJ page 439. While deciding case of Lalit Mohan Puri V/ s. Pure Drinks (New Delhi ) Ltd. , Delhi High Court observed that , employer cannot act on the basis of presumptions. In the said case (Supra ) , the petitioner of the case was in the employment ofthe Pure Drinks (New Delhi ) Ltd. He served for 16 years . He was salesman and was driving vehicle to sell Coca Cola and other soft drinks . He was asked to drive heavy vehicle to which he refused and charge sheet was served asking to reply within 48 hrs . Said charge sheet was replied pointing out his case . It was not liked by the em- ployer and so action was taken without holding enquiry and termination was affect which is treated illegal by Delhi High Court . Another Citation referred published in 1990 II CLRwhere Apex Court while deciding case of Puniab Land Development & Reclamation Corporation Ltd. , Chandigarh & Ors . V/ s . Presiding Officer . Labour Court . Chandigarh observed that . retrenchment means termination by employer where provision of Industrial Disputes Act required to be followed before effecting such a termination . Citation pub- lished in 1995 II LLJ page 716 reveals that , while deciding case ofRameshwar Dass & Ors . etc. V/s . State ofHaryana, Apex Court observed that employer has to assists the pos- sibility of providing alternative job and without it manage- ment cannot take decision of termination declaring em- ployee unfit . Citation referred published in 2006 I LLJ 480 reveals that , request of disabled employee to given alter- native work without giving proper consideration if rejected, such employce is entitled to reinstatement . Citation referred published in 1992 LAB IC page 451 where Orissa High Curt observed that , continuous ill health cannot be as- sumed without hearing concerned workman and manage- ment cannot take action simply relying on it and terminate employee . Whereas first party's advocate place reliance on the Citation published in 1991 I CLR page 525 where Apex Court while deciding Anand Bihari & ors . V/s . Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr . observed that , if there is any disorder in health which inca- pagitates an individual from discharging duties , in that case if decision of termination is taken it is just and proper . However facts of that case and facts of the case which is at hand are different . In the above case (Supra) employer after issuing notice and issuing charge sheet, consider the explanation of workman and then it took decision of that type which is observed just and proper. However in the instant case at hand no such notice issued nor show- cause notice. There was no hearing of second party on that . No chargesheet given . No explanation sought . So definitely such a decision taken in such case was not decision as taken in Anand Bibari Case. Even first party's advocate place reliance on station published in 2005 III CLR 120 where Bombay High Court while deciding case of 9767 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायणः 24,1929

ANNEXURE

accident . It is not denied by first party that, second party workman met with an accident while he was on duty . So I answer these issues to that effect.

BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL PRESIDING OFFICER

Issue No.4.

CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I

NEW DELHI

I. D. No. 119/2000

17. Sihce second party died on 23-01-2007 , question ofconsidering his ability to perform duties after 23-01-2007 does not arise .

Inthe matter of dispute between:

Shri Ajnesh ,

18. In view of discussions made above , I conclude that, reference of second party required to allow partly hence the order :

ORDER

I. Reference is partly allowed .

Through TheGeneral Secretary , P.N.B. Employees Union , W-8,GreenPark, New Delhi - 16 .

Workman

Versus

2. Heirs of second party i.e. Smt . Pragati Prakash Dalvi , widow of deceased workman is entitled to get wages of deceased workman on the basis of hissalary of that period from 17-08-1999 with all increments and hike in the salary till 23-01-2007 presuming that, deceased workman was in the employment of first party.

The Regional Manager , Punjab National Bank, Regional Office, Punjab National Bank, AtmaRam House , 1, TolstoyMarg, NewDelhi .

3. Other prayer of deceased workman to reinstate him or take his heir in the employment of first party or compassionate ground is turn down .

Management 4. In the circumstances there is no order as to cost .

Appearances: None for the workman .

Date:04-10-2007

Shri Ashwani Sharma A/R for management .

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12012/98/2000/IR( B - II ) dated 18-10-2000 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

का. आ. 3502 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 119/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in not regularizing the services of Shri Ajnesh , Sweeper ( Temporary/Part Time) is legal andjust? If not, what relief is the said dispu-- tant . entitled to ?"

[सं. एल-12012/98/2000- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

S.O. 3502.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/2000) of Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal-cum -Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 20-11-2007.

2.After filing claim statement , written statement and rejoinder the case was fixed for filing document on 30-8-2004 . Thereafter case was adjourned to 7-11-05 for filing documents and admission denial and many subsequent hearings on 18-1-06, 23-3-06, 5-6-06, 8-8-06 , 1-11-06, 4-1-07, 1-3-07, 26-4-07, 19-6-07, 5-9-07, and today on5-11-07 but none has been appearing for the workman since 26-4-07 . The workman lastly appeared in this case on 1-3-07 . It appears that the workman is not interested in the prosecution of his claim . Hence No Dispute Award is accordingly passed . File be consigned to record room.

DATED: 5-11-2007

[No. L- 12012/98 /2000- IR (B - II) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

SANT SINGH BAL, Presiding Officer 9768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3503 :-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार व्यास प्रोजेक्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.- I , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 73/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/ 177/90- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November, 2007 S.O. 3503. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 73/91) Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Beas Project and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-42012/ 177/90 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, No. 1 . CHANDIGARH

Case No I.D. 73/91

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)) terminating the services of Sh . Om Prakash , S / o Sh . Amar Singh w.e.f. 31-7-1985 isjustified? If not, what relief is the workman concerned is entitled to ? " 2. The case fixed for settlement for dispute between Om Parkash workman and management of Beas Project on 17-1-07 . The management considered the request and came out today in settlement in Lok Adalat and submitted that management settled the dispute as prayed by the workman on 17-1-07 and brought a cheque of Rs . 75000/- in settlement which was acceptable to the workman on 17-1-07 . Today son of the workman Om Parkash deceased came with his advocate and submitted that workman has expired on 30-3-07 leaving four survivor LR's Varinder Singh, Bal Krishan, Meena Kumari ( children) and Kashmir Kaur wife and an application has been filed under Order 22 CPC on 24-10-07 for impleading the LRs . Copy given . The management has no objection as also it is an inter- se dispute between surviving LRs and an affidavit has been filed by Varinder Singh has been filed and special attorney onbehalf of other three LRs ( Death certificate filed ) . The management has no objection on bringing the LRs on record. LRs . submit that in view of the desire of their deceased father for settlement , they have also settled the dispute with the management and also agreed what ever the management is giving to them . They are ready to settle the dispute in Lok Adalat by accepting the cheque on behalf oftheirdeceased father Om Parkash and they will distribute among LRs . this cheque . Hence matter may be decided as settled.

Applicant

Sh . Om Parkash S/ o Sh . Amar Singh , Village Sandoli , P. O. Baddi , Tehsil Nalagarh , Distt . Solan(HP).

Versus

The Chief Engineer ,

Respondent (Electrical ) Beas Project , Sector 17 -A, Chandigarh .

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman : Sh . Ramnik Gupta Advocate .

Ms. Neeru Chadha .

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-42012/177/90- IR ( D.U. ) dated 14-6-1991 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of the Chief Engineer (Electrical ) Beas Project , Chandigarh in 3. Inview of the above dispute is returned as settled . Cheque No. B 228978 dated 16-10-07 for Rs . 75000/-drawn on S. B. I. Bhiwani is given to Varinder Singh son who is special attorney of all other three LR's against proper receipt . The matter is settled in Lok Adalat in above terms . Central Govt .be informed . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh 31-10-2007

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3504 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्मी स्कूल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -14012 / 11 /2005- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November, 2007 S.O. 3504. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

9769.

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 25/2006 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the managernent of Army School and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L- 14012/ 11 /2005- IR (DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, No. 1, CHANDIGARH

Case No I.D. 25/2006

Smt. Surjit Kaur

Applicant C/ o Sh . M. R. Dhiman , Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh , Puri Road, Arya Samaj , Patiala (Punjab) .

Versus

ThePrincipal ,

Respondent Army School, 40, Baradari ,

Patiala (Punjab) .

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri . M. R. Dhiman .

Shri . Rakesh Joshi.

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Government vide notification No. L- 14012/ 11 /2005IR ( D.U.) dated 22-5-2006 has referred the follow- ing dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Army School, Patiala in terminating the services ofSmt . Surjit Kaur, Ex - Sweepress w.e.f. 16-11-2004 without complying with the provisions ofthe ID Act, 1947 is legalandjustified? Ifnot, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ?" 2. Case taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . Workman on 16-7-07 made the statement that she receives a cheque of Rs . 25000/- through a cheque No. 104212 dated 3-7-07 as full and final settlement of her claim including right of reinstatement , reemploynient or my amount of the payment of gratuity etc. from M/ s . Army School . She also stated that she forego her right of reinstatement or re -employment with the school management . I have no pending claim against the management and she shall not raise any kind of dispute to claim against the M/s . Army School Patiala . In view ofher settlement , she withdraw her both the cases i.e. reference No. L - 14012/ 11 /2005 / IR (DU) I.D. No. 25/06 in this court and reference No. 605/05 at Labour Court Patiala and her cases may be dismissed as settled.

3. In view of the above statement and clearance of the cheque by the bank, the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . as settled . Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3505 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 227/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/9/2000- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3505. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 227/2000 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/9/2000- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, No. 1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No I.D. 227/2000

Applicant Sh.Gurtej Singh S/o Sh . Piara Singh , C/o Sh . N. K. Jeet , President , Telecom Labour Union , Mohalla Hari Nagar, LalSingh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb . )- 151001 .

Versus

Respondent (a) The General Manager , Telecom, Bhatinda

(Punjab)-151001.

9770

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 / AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

APPEARANCES

For the workman :

Shri . R. P. Singh .

Shri . G. C. Babbar .

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007 .

Central Govt . vide notification No. L- 40012/9/ 2000/ IR ( D.U. ) dated 30-5-2000 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication :---

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager , Telecom , Bhatinda in terminating the services of Sh . Gurtej Singh S/ o Sh . Piara Singh is legal andjustified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ?"

'The Case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view of the same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigrah.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3506 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 203/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 27/2000- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3506.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 203/2000) Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007 .

[No. L-40012/27/2000 - IR ( DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMNET INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, NO. -1 , CHANDIGARH .

Case No I.D. 203/2000

Sh . Kulvir Singh

Applicant C/ o Sh . N. K. Jeet , President , Telecom Labour Union , Mohalla Hari Nagar , Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda ( Pb . ) - 151001 .

Versus

(a) The General Manager ,

Respondent Deptt.OfTelecom ,

Hoshiyarpur- 146001 .

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri . R. P. Singh .

Ms.Deepali Puri .

Forthe management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007 .

Central Govt. vide notification No. L -40012/27/2000/ IR (D.U. ) dated 30-5-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager , Telecom , Hoshiyarpur (Pb . ) in ordering disengagement/ termination of services of Sh . Kulvir Singh a workman engaged through contractor Sh . Ashok kumar Sharma w.e.f. 1-3-99 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ? "

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide his statement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view of the same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3507: औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचारं विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9771

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

209/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/72/2000- आई आर ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3507.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 209/2000) Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/72/2000-IR(DU)] SURENDRA SINGH , DeskOfficer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL. TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, -1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No I.D. 209/2000

Applicant Sh . Kamaljit Singh Sodhi ,

C/o Sh. N. K. Jeet, President, Telecom Labour Union , MohallaHari Nagar, Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb.)- 151001 .

Versus

Respondent (a)TheGeneral Manager, Deptt.OfTelecom, Hoshiyarpur- 152001 .

APPEARANCES

Fortheworkman :

Shri . R. P. Singh.

Ms.Deepali Puri .

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/72/2000/ IR (D.U. ) dated 31-5-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager, Telecom, Hoshiyarpur (Pb . ) in ordering disengagement/termination ofservices ofSh . Kamaljit Singh Sodhi aworkman engaged through contractor Sh. Ashok kumar Sharma w.e.f. 1-3-99 is legal and justified? Ifnet,to what reliefthe workman is entitled and from which date ?"

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties.The authorized representative ofthe workman 4878GA/07-

Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide his statement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view of the same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3508 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं.-I, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 61/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/495/2000- आई आर (डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 26th Nove :nber , 2007

S.O. 3508 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 61/2001 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/495 /2000- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer ,

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, -1 ,. CHANDIGARH

Case No I.D. 61/2001

Applicant Sh . Gurcharan Ram, C/o Sh . N. K. Jeet, 27349, Lal Singh Basti Road,

Bhatinda (Pb. )- 151001 .

Versus

Respondent (a) The General Manager , Deptt. ofTelecom ,

Hoshiyarpur- 146001 .

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman

Shri .R. P. Singh .

Ms.Deepali Puri .

For the management :

9772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/495/2000/ IR(D.U.) dated 31-01-2001 has referred the followingdis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager , Telecom , Hoshiyarpur in ordering disengagement/ termination of services of Sh . Gurcharan Ram workman engaged through contractor Sh . Ashok kumar Sharma w.e.f. 28-2-99 is just and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ? "

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3509 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण /श्रम न्यायालय नं.- I , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 53/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-40012/484/2000-आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3509. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 53/2001 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Govemment on 26-11-2007 .

[No. L-40012/484 /2000 - IR (DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT -1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No I.D. 53/2001

Sh . N. K. Jeet , President ,

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

Versus

Respondent (a) The General Manager ,

Deptt. ofTelecom ,

Hoshiyarpur .

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri . R. P. Singh .

For the management :

Ms.DeepaliPuri.

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/484/2000/ IR (D.U. ) dated 29-12-2000 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager , Telecom , Hoshiyarpur in ordering disengagement/termination of services of Sh. Hardip Singh a workman engaged through contractor M/ s Ram Krishan Budhram w.e.f. 28-2-2000 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ? "

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties. The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference.vide his statement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view of the same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record .

Chandigarh .

31-10-07 RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3510 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं.- I , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 43/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/450/2000-आई. आर. (डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November, 2007

Applicant

Telecom Labour Union ,

27349,

Lal Singh Basti Road , Bhatinda (Pb. )

S.O. 3510.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 43/2001) Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9773

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

workman, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/450/2000- IR (DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBU- NAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, -1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No I.D. 43/2001

Sh . N. K. Jeet , President,

Applicant Telecom Labour Union,

27349, Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb. )- 151001

Versus

(a) The General Manager ,

Respondent Deptt. ofTelecom , Hoshiyarpur- 146001.

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri . R. P. Singh .

For the manageinent :

Ms.DeepaliPuri .

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007 .

Central Govt. vide notification No. L -400 12/450/2000/ 1R(D.U. ) dated 18-01-2001 has referred the followingdis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether action of the management of General Manager , Telecom, Hoshiyarpur (Pb ) . in ordering disengagement/termination of services of Sh . Manjit Singh a workman engaged through contractor M/ s Gurbachan Lal w.e.f. 28-2-99 is just and legal? Ifnot, towhat reliefthe workman is entitled and from which date?"

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3511 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं.-1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 221/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

(सं. एम-40012/23/2000-आई आजार (डी. यू) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the26th November, 2007 S.O. 3511.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Rel No. 221/2000) Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , No. I Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/23 /2000-IR (DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL- TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, -1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No I.D. 221/2000

Sh .Amrik Singh C/ o Sh.N.K.Jeet,

President,

Applicant Telecom Labour Union ,

Mohalla HariNagar, Lal Singh Basti Road,

Bhatinda (Pb .)- 151001

Versus

Respondent (a) The General Manager ,

Deptt. ofTelecom,

Hoshiyarpur- 152001 . (Punjab)

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri . RP. Singh.

For the management :

Ms.Deepali Puri .

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007 .

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/23/2000/ IR (D.U. ) dated 30-05-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the General Manager, Telecom , Hoshiyarpur (Pb) . in ordering disengagement/termination of services of Sh . Amrik 9774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

Singh a workman engaged through contractor Sh . Ashok Kumar Sharma w.e.f. 1-3-99 is legal and justified ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled and from which date ? "

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties . The authorized representative ofthe workman Shri Ram Hartap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Çentral Govt. be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3512 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.- I , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 185/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 17/2000- आई आर ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3512. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 185/2000 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, No. I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/ 17/2000- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT No. I, CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 185/2000

Sh . Prakash Singh C/ o Sh . N.K. Jeet ,

President,

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii))

Versus

Respondent TheGeneral Manager,

Telecom,

Bhatinda- 152001 . (Punjab) 151001

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri . R. P. Singh .

ShriG.C.Babbar. For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/ 17/2000/ IR (D.U. ) dated 30-05-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Telecom, Bhatinda in terminating services of Sh . Prakash Singh S/o . Sh . Harbans Singh is legal andjustified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ?"

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties. The authorized representative ofthe workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view of the same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh. 31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3513 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 139/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012 /41/2002- आई आर ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 26th November, 2007

Applicant

Telecom Labour Union ,

Mohalla Hari Nagar,

Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb .)- 151001

S.O. 3513.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 139/2002) Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/41 /2002- IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer 9775 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007.

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, NO. 1, CHANDIGARH.

CaseNoI.D. 139/2002

Sh .Jaswant Singh C/o ./ N. K. Jeet.

H.No. 27349,

S.O. 3514.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 137/2002) Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, No. I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

MohallaHari Nagar, Lal SinghBasti Road, Bhatinda (Pb. )- 151005

No. L-40012/60/2002-IR (DU)] Versus

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer TheGeneralManager,

Respondent

ANNEXURE

Deptt.OfTelecom,

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING Amritsar (Punjab)

APPEARANCES

OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, No. 1 , : For theworkman

Shri . R. P. Singh .

CHANDIGARH

Shri Ci.C.Babbar.

Forthe management :

CaseNo I.D. 137/2002

Sh.Bikram Singh C/o . Sh . N. K. Jeet.

AWARD

H. No. 27349,

Applicant Passed on 31-10-2007 .

Mohalla Hari Nagar , -

Lal Singh Basti Road,

Bhatinda(Pb.)

Versus

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/41 /2002/ IR(D.U.) dated 24-7-2002 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Respondent

TheGeneral Manager,

Deptt. ofTelecom,

Amritsar (Punjab)

APPEARANCES

For theworkman

Shri . R. P. Singh .

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager, Telecom , Amritsar in terminating the services of Sh . Jaswant Singh S/o . Sh. Gurnam Singh workman w.e.f. 28-2-99 is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

ShriG.C.Babbar.

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties. The authorized representative ofthe workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt . be informed . Filebe consigned to record.

Central Govt . vide notification No. L -40012/60/2002/ IR(D.U.) dated 24-7-2002 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Chandigarh.

31-10-07

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager, Telecom , Amritsar in terminating the services of Sh . Bikram Singh S/o . Sh. Tarlok Singh workmanw.e.f. 28-2-99 is just and legal ? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from witich date?"

का. आ. 3514 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request ofthe parties . The authorized representative ofthe workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view of the same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt. be informed. File be consigned to record.

(1947 का 14 ) की धास 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालये नं.- 1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 137/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

Chandigarh.

[सं. एल -40012/60/2002- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

31-10-07

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी 9776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3515:-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 29/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties. The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigrah 31-10-07

[सं. एल-40012/ 186/2002- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3515. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 29/2003 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/ 186/2002 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH Case No I. D 29/2003

Sh. Baljeet Singh , C/ o. Sh N.K. Jeet, 27349 Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda(Pb .)- 151001

...Applicant

VERSUS

TheGeneral Manager ,

Telecom, BSNL E- 10B Building Behind HPO, Bhatinda ( Punjab )

...Respondent

APPEARANCES

:Shri R, P . Singh

:Shri G.C. Babbar For the workman For the management

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-07

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/ 186/2002- IR (DU) dated 18-02-2003 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3516:-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 59/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/330/2001-आई आर( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November, 2007 S.O. 3516 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 59/2002) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Govemment on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/330/2001 - IR ( DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH Case No I.D 59/2002

Sh. Nand Lal ,

(Pb.)-151001 C/ o . Sh N.K. Jeet , 27349 , Mohalla Hari Nagar, Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda

Applicant

VERSUS

TheTelecom DistrictManager ,

BSNL

Ropar-140001

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Telecom; (BSNL) Bhatinda in terminating the services ofSh. Baljeet Singh S/o Sh. Balram Singh workman, w.e.f. 1-3-99 is just and legal ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date?"

.Respondent APPEARANCES

:Shri R.P. Singh For the workman For the management

: Ms. Deepali Puri 9777 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

VERSUS

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-07.

TheTelecomDistrict Manager,

BSNL

Ropar-140001

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/330/2001- IR (DU) dated 14-03-2002 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman : Shri

R.P. Singh

Ms.DeepaliPuri

For the management

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management ofTelecom Distt. Manager, BSNL, Ropar in terminating the ser- vicesof Sh . Nand Lal S/o Sh . Budh Ram workman, w.e.f. 1-03-99 is just and legal? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date? "

Passed on 31-10-07

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/336/2001- IR(DU) dated 14-03-2002 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative ofthe workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigrah 31-10-07

"Whether the action of the management ofTelecom Distt . Manager , BSNL , Ropar terminating the services of Sh . Jaswant Singh S/o Sh . Gurbax Singh workman, w.e.f. 1-03-99 isjust and leagal? Ifnot , to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date?"

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties. The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view ofthe same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt. be informed. File be consigned to record.

का. आ. 3517: औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigrah 31-10-07

[सं. एल -40012/336/2001- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

का. आ. 3518 :-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 333/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । کی

S.O. 3517.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 57/2002) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007 .

[सं. एल-40012/238/2001- आई आर (डी यू ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी [No. L-40012/336/2001 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

NewDelhi, the 26th November , 2007 ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- I ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D 57/2002

Sh . Jaswant Singh ,

S.O. 3518. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 333/2001 ) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda

[No. L-40012/238/2001 - IR (DU) ] C/ o . Sh N.K. Jeet, H. No. 27349, Mohalla Hari Nagar, (Pb. )-151005

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

...Applicant 9778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART IISEC . 3( ii)] ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on26-11-2007.

Case I. D. No. 333/2001

Sh.Ashok Kumar ,

[No. 1-40012/478/99- IR(DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

C/ o . Sh N.K. Jeet, Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb .)- 151001

...Applicant

Versus

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBU- NAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I. D No. 175/2000

Sh. Raj Singh S/o Bir Singh ,

TheGeneralManager , Teledom, Bhatinda(Pb.)- 151001.

C/ o. Sh N.K. Jeet,

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman

:Shri R.P. Singh

Mohalla Hari Nagar , Lal singh Basti Road,

:Shri G.C. Babbar

President, Telecom Labour Union , Bhatinda (Pb .)- 151001

For the management

AWARD

Applicant Passed on 31-10-2007

Versus

The General Manager ,

Telecom,

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/238/2001- IR (DU) dated 06-11-2001 has referred the followingdis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Bhatinda (Pb. )- 151001.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman

:Shri R.P. Singh :ShriG.C. Babbar

For the management

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager , Telecom , Bhatinda in terminating the services of Sh . Ashok Kumar S/o Sh . Sohan Lal is just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date? "

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/478/99- IR (DU) dated 13-03-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties. The authorized representative ofthe workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide his statement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

31-10-07

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Telecom , Bhatinda in terminating the ser- vicesof Sh . Raj Singh S/o Sh. Bir Singh is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman isen- titled to and from which date?"

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer का. आ. 3519 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 175/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Chandigarh 31-10-07

[सं. एल-40012/478/99- आई आर ( डी यू) ]

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

का. आ. 3520 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ S.O. 3519. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 175/2000) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- 9779 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

संख्या 177/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/474/99- आई. आर. (डी.यू.) ]

Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view of the same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt. be informed. File be consigned to record.

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

NewDelhi , the 26th November , 2007

31-10-07

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

S.O. 3520.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 177/2000 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

का. आ. 3521 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 159/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[No. L-40012/474/99-IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

[सं. एल -40012/460/99- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] ANNEXURE

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 26th November , 2007 BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 177/2000

Sh . Beant Singh S/ o Gurdev Singh ,

C/ o . Sh N.K. Jeet,

President , Telecom Labour Union, Mohalla Hari Nagar,

S.O. 3521. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 159/2000) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007 .

[No. L-40012/460/99 - IR (DU)] Lal Singh Basti Road , Bhatinda (Pb .)- 151001

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

Applicant

ANNEXURE

VERSUS

TheGeneral Manager,

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT -1 , CHANDIGARH Telecom, Bhatinda (Pb. )- 151001 .

Case I.D No. 159/2000

Respondent

Sh. Gurcbaran Singh

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Shri R.P. Singh

Shri G.C. Babbar

For the management

AWARD

C/ o . Sh N.K. Jeet , President, Telecom Labour Union , MohallaHari Nagar, Lal Singh Basti Road ,Bhatinda (Pb.)- 151001

Passed on 31-10-07

.Applicant

Versus

TheGeneral Manager ,

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/474/99- IR (DU) dated 13-03-2000 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Deptt. ofTelecom,

Hoshiyarpur 146001.

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman : Shri R. P. Singh

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager, Telecom, Bhatinda in terminating the ser- vices of Sh . Beant Singh S /o Sh . Gurdev Singh is leagal and justified? If not , to what reliefthe work- man is entitled to and from which date ?"

Ms.Deepali Puri .

For the management

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman

4878G1/07-10 9780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

[ PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] AWARD

Versus

Passed on 31-10-2007

The General Manager ,

Telecom,

Bhatinda ( Pb .) - 151001 .

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/460/99- IR (DU) dated 13-03-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

... Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman : Shri R. P. Singh

Shri G. C. Babbar

For the management :

"Whether the action of the General Manager, Telecom, Hoshiyarpur in ordering disengagement/ termination ofservices of Sh . Gurcharan Singh , workman engaged through contractor Sh . Ashok Kumar Sharma w.e.f. 1-3-99 is legal andjustified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L - 40012 / 175/ 99- IR (DU) dated 29-09-1999 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties. The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide his statement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

"Whether action of the management of the General Manager , Telecom , Bhatinda in terminating the ser- vicesof Ms. Neetu just and legal ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date ?" 31-10-07

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view of the same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer का. आ. 3522 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 काः 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 219/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Chandigrah 31-10-07

[सं. एल -40012/175/99- आई आर( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

का. आ. 3523.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 165/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

S.O. 3522 .--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 219/99 ) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007 .

[No. L-40012/ 175/99 - IR (DU ) ]

[सं. एल-40012/462/99- आई आर (डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR , PRESIDING

OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT - 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D.219/99

Miss Neetu

C/ o . The President ,

Telecom Labour Union ,

Mohalla Hari Nagar,

S.O. 3523. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 165/2000 ) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workınen, which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007 .

Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb.)- 151001

.Applicant

[No. L-40012/462/99 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

9781

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/अग्नहायण 24, 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT -1 , CHANDIGARH Case No. I.D. 165/2000

MissAnju Bala

C/ o. Sh . N.K. Jeet

President,

Telecom Labour Union, Mohalla Hari Nagar, Lal Singh Basti Road ,Bhatinda (Pb .)-151001

...Applicant

Versus

The General Manager ,

Deptt ofTelecom , Hoshiyarpur- 146001 .

.Respondent APPEARANCES

For the workman

: Shri R.P. Singh

Ms.Deepali Puri For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 163/2000) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government. on26-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/464/99- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 163/2000

Ms. Kulwinder Kaur

C/ o . Sh . N.K. Jeet

President,

Telecom Labour Union , Mohalla Hari Nagar, LalSingh Basti Road , Bhatinda

(Pb.)- 151001

Centrai Govt . vide notification No , L -40012/462/99- IR (DU) dated 13-03-2000 has referred the following dis- pute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

Applicant.

Versus

The General Manager,

Deptt. ofTelecom ,

Hoshiyarpur- 146001 .

... Respondent APPEARANCES

For the workman

" Whether the action of the General Manager , Telecom , Fíoshiyarpur ( Pb. ) in ordering disengage- ment/termination of services of Miss . Anju Bala workman engaged through contractor Sh . Ashok Kumar Sharma w.e.f. 1-3-99 is leagal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?"

مر

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigarh

31-10-07

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3524.-औद्योगिक विबाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या \163/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/464/99- आई आर ( डीयू ) ]

: Shri R. P. Singh For the management

: Ms. Deepaii Puri

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt. vide notification No. L -40012/464/99- IR (DU) dated 13-03-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of the General Manager, Teiecom , Hoshiyarpur ( Pb . ) in ordering disengagement/termination of services of Miss . Kulwinder Kaur workman engaged through contractor Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma w.e.f. 1-3-99 is leagai and justified? If not , to what relief the work- man is entitled to and from which date?"

2.The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at fe request of the parties . The authorized representative of he workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present sference vide his statement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view ofthe same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat. Central Govt . be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3524.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central 31-10-07

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3525. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार 9782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] =

Adalat . Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Chandigarh

31-10-07

विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/2001) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 कौ प्राप्त हुआ था ।

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

[सं. एल-40012/448/2000- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

का. आ. 3526 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 223/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/14/2000- आई आर( डी यू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी S.O. 3525 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41 / 2001) Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court , No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

New Delhi , the 26th November, 2007 [No. L-40012/448/2000- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT -1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 41/2001

Sh . N. K. Jeet ,

S.O. 3526.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 223/2000) Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on26-11-2007.

President,

[No. L-40012/14/2000- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Telecom LabourUnion , 27349, Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda (Pb .)- 151001

.Applicant

Versus

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT,-1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 223/2000

Sh . Jagsir Singh

The General Manager , Deptt . ofTelecom, Hoshiyarpur - 146001.

S/ o Sh . Piara Singh

.Respondent

C/ o Sh . N. K. Jeet ,

APPEARANCES

President,

For the workman

:Shri R. P. Singh

Telecom Labour Union ,

For the management

:Ms. Deepali Puri

Mohalla Hari Nagar,

AWARD

Lal Singh Basti Road, Bhatinda

Passed on 31-10-2007

(Pb.)-151001

.Applicant

VERSUS

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-40012/448/2000- IR ( DU) dated 18-01-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

The General Manager ,

Telecom,

Bhatinda (Punjab)-151001 .

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman

:Shri R. P. Singh

:Shri G. C. Babbar

For the management

"Whether action of the Management of the General Manager , Telecom, Hoshiyarpur ( Pb. ) in ordering disengagement/termination of services of Sh . Raj Kumar a workman engaged through contractor M/s. Gurbachan Lal w.e.f. 25-4-98 just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ?"

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-07

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-40012/ 14/2000

IR (D.U. ) dated 29-05-2000 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

2. The case is taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007 . In view of the same, the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok 9783

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24,1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

"Whether the action of the managementof the General Manager, Telecom , Bhatinda in terminating the services of Sh . Jagsir Singh $ /o Sh . Piara Singh isleagal andjustified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe work- man is entitled and from which date ? "

The case is takenup in Lok Adalat at the request of the parties . The authorized representative of the workman Shri Ram Partap Singh withdraw the present reference vide hisstatement recorded on 31-10-2007. In view of the same , the present reference is returned as withdrawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigrah 31-10-07

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3527 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 283/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/304/2003- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3527.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 283/2004) of Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Public Work Department and their workmen, receivedby the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-42012/304/2003- IR (CM- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, -1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 283/2004

The Zonal Secretary,

All India CPWD ( MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, CPWD. Store Building, Sector 7 -B, Chandigarh .

Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer ,

Central Public Work Department , Chandigarh Central Electrical Divison ,

Kendriya Sadan, Sector 9 - A, Chandigarh

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workınan

: Shri Raj Kumar

: Shri G. C. Babbar .

For the management

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-07

Central Govt. vide notification No. L-42012/304/2003- IR(C M II ) dated 23-08-2004 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the contract between the management of CPWD and their contract is sham and the demand of All India CPWD ( MRM) Karamchari Sangathan for regularization ofthe services of Shri Anil Kumar Kalra inthe Organization ofCPWD is legal andjustified? if not, to what relief they are entitled?

2. Case taken up in Lok Adalat at the request of the AR ofthe Union Shri Raj Kumar Zonal Present All India CPWD (MRAM) Karamchari Sangathan , Chandigarh made a state- ment that the Union in this case is not intrested to persue with the matter further and withdraw the same in Lok Adalat today.

3. In view of the statement of the AR of the workman that Union in this is not interested to persue with the mat- ter further and withdraw the same in Lok Adalat today, the present reference is returned to the Central Govt. as with- drawn in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigrah 31-10-07

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3528 : औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी. एम.बी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं-1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 129/ 2k ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -23012/2/ 1999- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3528. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 129/2k) of the Central Government Indiustrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , No .. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workmen,which was received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-23012/2/ 1999 - IR (C- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 ,

CHANDIGARH Case No I. D. 129/2000

Sh . Ram Nath

C/o Sh . R.K. Singh , Secy. , Punjab INTUC, 35 -G, Nangal Township .

.Applicant 9784

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15, 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

Versus

The Chief Engineer ,

BhakraDam,

Nangal Township , Distt. Roper ( Punjab) .

cum-Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Small Industries Service Institute and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007 .

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman

:Shri R.K. Singh .

Forthe management

:Shri Rajinder Singh .

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-23012/2/ 99-1R (CM - II ) dated29-2-1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of BBMB , Nangal Township , Distt . Ropar in terminating the services of Sh . Ram Nath S/ o Sh . Ram Chand is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. Case taken up in Lok Adalat today . AR of the work- man shri R.K. Singh made a statement that the matter has been settled amicably and the workman does not want to pursue with the present reference . The same may be returned as settled in Lok Adalat .

3. In viewof the above statement of the recorded today the present reference is returned as settled. Central Govt. be informed. File be consigned to record.

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigrah

31-10-2007

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का. आ. 3529,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्माल इन्डस्ट्रीज सरवीस इन्स्टीट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/185/2001- आई. आर.( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3529.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

[No. L-42012/ 185/2001 - IR (CM - II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No I.D 15/2003

Sh . Balikaran Prasad

C/ o Sh. B.N. Sehgal

49/69, Harpal Nagar , Ludhiana .

.Applicant

Versus

TheDirector,

Small Industries Service Institute ,

Industrial Area-B ,

Ludhiana - 141003

.Respondent APPEARANCES

Fortheworkman

:Shri B.N. Sehgal

: Shri K.K. Thakur Forthe management

AWARD

Passed on 31-10-2007

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-42012/ 185/2001- IR (C - II ) dated 14-1-2003 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Small Industries Service Institute , Ludihana in terminat- ing Sh . Balikaran Parshad from services is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is en- titled to ?"

2. Case taken up in Lok Adalat today. AR ofthe work- man shri B.N. Sehgal made a statement on 29-10-07 that on instructions from workman Bali Karan Prashad that matter has been settled and workman has been reinstated and he has joined his duties and this case may be disposed off as settled in Lok Adalat as learned court made efforts in this regard.

3. In view of the satement of the advocate of the work- man Shri B.N. Sehgal , the present reference is withdrawn and returned as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record .

RAJESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Chandigarh 31-10-07 9785 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 ,1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

Security Guard w.e.f. 02-09-2004 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to."

Theworkman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the claimant/ workmanwas called for interview for the post of Chowkidar by the respondent vide letter dated 16-10-2003 and was appointed as Chowkidar/Security Guard on daily wages basisby the respondent vide letter dated 28-10-2003 .

का. आ. 3530,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशनल फर्टीलाइजर क्वालिटी एण्ड ट्रेनिंग इंस्टिट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/178/2005- आई आर ( सीएम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

That the workmanworked regularly from 28-10-2003 to 02-09-2004 as daily wager Security Guard and has completed more than 240 days during his service .

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

That on 02-09-2004, the respondent terminated the services ofthe workman absolutely in an illegal and arbitrary manner without complying with the mandatory provisions of the ID Act , 1947 and against the principles of natural justice.

That during his service span from 28-10-2003 to 02-09-2004 the workman regularly worked as a Chowkidar / Security Guard and was duly paid by the respondent .

S.O. 3530.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2006) of Central Government Indusrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 2 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Fertilizer Quality Control and Training Institute , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L-42012/ 178/2005- IR ( CM - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

That the unfair labour practice is at the peak in the respondent Office . The respondent appoints any person at any time and terminates any employee at any time in flagrant violation of the laws of the country. The services of the workman have also been terminated by the respondent in the same manner , which amounts to an instance of grave unfair labour practice of which the workman is a victim .

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI . I.D. No. 81/2006

That the termination of the services of the workman bythe respondent on 02-09-2004 is absolutely illegal , null and void abinitio against the provisions of the Constitution ofIndia and is non -existent in the eyes of law and is liable to be set aside on the grounds of inter alia the following :

Inthe matter of: Shri Jagbir Singh ,

S/ o. Shri Tej Ram, Village: Bhankri ,

Tehsil & Distt: Faridabad, Post: Pali ,

That no notice or pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation was paid to the workman at the time of termination of his services which is in violation ofSection 25 F /25 N of the ID Act, 1947.

Faridabad (Haryana) .

VERSUS

TheDirector,

That no permission was sought from the appropriate Government by the respondent before terminating the services ofthe workman as required under Section 25 N of the ID Act, 1947 .

Central Fertilizer Quality Control & Training Institute , NH - IV, Faridabad (Haryana) .

AWARD

Thatfresh person Mr. Virender , S/ o. Smt . Kamla, Peon in the respondent department has been employed by the respondent in place of the workman after terminating the services ofthe workman which is in violation of the Section 25 H of the ID Act, 1947 .

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-42012/ 178/ 2005 - IR ( CM - II ) Central Government 17-10-2006 has referred the following point for adjudication .

Thepoint runs as hereunder :

"Whether the action of the management of Central Fertilizer Quality Control & Training Institute in terminating the services of Shri Jagbir Singh, S/ o . Shri Tej Ram , Chowkidar/

The management has filed reply to the claim statement. In the reply it has stated that Sh . Jagbir Singh joined his services on casual daily wages basis w.e.f. 28.10.2003 . His dedication towards his duties and his attitude /behaviour towards his seniors was un - satisfactory since his joining . Moreover many a times the management 9786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 / AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

had received many complaints against the workman and perusing to which he was warned accordingly. Moreover many a times he was found in drunken state over which also he was warned by the management which remained without results . On 02-09-2004 he was again found in drunken state while he was on his duty and he also misbehaved with the other security guards on duty including an officer of the Institute. For his that misbehaviour he was again officially warned but realizing his guilt on his own he absented from duty after 02-09-2004.

It is submitted that Sh . Jagbir Singh had been deployed as Security Guard w.e.f. 28-10-2003 on purely casual and daily wages basis as per the rate prescribed by Dy.Commissioner, Faridabad for daily wagers after being sponsored by Zila Sainik Board , Faridabad . He was not appointed on any post of permanent nature . He was well informed that his services are only on casual daily wages basis as per the rate fixed by the Haryana Government .

It is submitted that the applicant was taken by the Institute on purely daily wages as per need basis. It is not correct that he has regularly worked for more than 240 dayswithout break . The fact is that he has worked only for 25 days to maximum 29 days in a month with the break varying from 2 to 5 days in different months . Thus , there is no continuous working on daily wages basis . The applicant was paid only for the day for which he worked.

It issubmitted that he was found in drunken state on 02-09-2004 while on duty and misbehaved with other security guard and even the officer of the institute . This was an unpardonable misbehaviour , disobedience and also liability for the institute . Further realizing his guilt on his own he absented from duty after 02-09-2004 .

That since his working was not found satisfactory and the indulged into misconduct and dereliction of duty , of coming on duty in drunken state and quarrelling with fellow colleagues , risking the safety and security of the laboratory and its belongings and further not mending his habits even after verbal and written warnings , he was removed.

That as already stated above realizing his serious misconduct the workman absented himself at his own w.e.f. 02-09-2004.

That the institute is a Central Government Office engaged in the General Development activities and it is not an industrial organization and not engaged in any production work and so not an " Industry " and hence the Industrial Dispute Act does not apply herein . Further the Section 25 F of the Act is not applicable because the workman was deployed as daily wager in Government Office on casual work. Also his deployment was only on need based daily wages basis , there is no termination of service in this case ; there is no illegality and arbitrariness .

That the claimant was given appropriate opportunity

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] to improve himself. He was verbally warned on 03-06-2004 for attending duty in drunken state and quarrelling with other security guards. He had apologized for the same for his misbehaviour and promised not to drink during duty hours . Even then there was no improvement .

basis . The applicant was deployed only on daily wages The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that the institute is a Central Government Office engaged in the General Development activities and it is not an industrial organization and not engaged in any production work and so not an " Industry " and hence the Industrial Dispute Act doesnot apply herein.

The management is engaged in systematic activities . It is engaged in general development activities . There is employer - employee relationship. It has been held in Bangalore Water Supply that in case where there is systematic activities , there is employer - employee relationship , the undertaking is an industry u/s 2 (j ) of the ID Act, 1947. It is not denied that there is no systematic activities and there is no employer - employee relationship , so the management is an industry.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that hewas appointed as casual labour on daily wages basis on 28-10-2003 and his services were terminated on 02-09-2004. Hehas completed more than 240 days . The management has not complied with the provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act , 1947. He has not been paid retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu ofnotice . Muster Roll register has been filed.

Itbecomes quite obvious from perusal of the muster roll that the workman has worked for more than 240 days in between 28-10-2003 to 02-09-2004 . It is also admitted that the workman has not been paid retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu of notice.

Itwas further submitted from the side of the workman that the management has alleged misconduct and drunkenness against the workman but he has not been served any charge sheet and no proper inquiry has been held.

It was submitted from the side of the management that the management received many complaints against the workman at many times and he was warned orally . He was found in drunken state on 02-09-2004, so he was asked 9787 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15 , 2007/ अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

[भाग 11--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

no such allegation of drunkenness while on duty and fighting with other co - employees . The management has taken the case that he was found in drunken state on several occasions and he was warned orally. Sh . Ishwar Singh, the co-employee made a complaint and the matter was inquired into and on 02-09-2004 the workman was again found in a drunken state .

not to come . He also misbehaved with the other security personnel including Officer ofthe Institute for that he was again officially warned and realizing his guilt on his own , he absented himself from duty. The management has filed MW2 complaint by Security Personnel , Sh. Ishwar Singh. Ex. MW2 is the complaint against the workman Shri Jagbir Singh.

Itbecomes quite obvious from the above that fullfledged inquiry is not necessary in every case on a misconduct of a casual employee who has worked for a short period . Th~ management found sufficient proof of misconduct and that is why the management asked the workman not to come on duty. There is sufficient evidence in the record to establish that the workman used to take alcohol while on duty.

It is true that the name of the workman has not been mentioned in the complaint . It has been alleged in the complaint that when the other Security Personel Shri Ishwar Singh came on 23:30 , he knocked the main gate but none opened it . After jumping over the boundary he went inside and found that the workman was taking drinks in the Driver'sroom . An empty bottle of wine was also found there . The workman quarreled with him on 01-06-2004, 02-06-2004 and torned his shirt and he went away from duty at00:30 and came at 00:55 .

Inthis letter the name of the workman has not been mentioned . The incident relates to 01-06-2004 and 02-06-2004. On 01-06-2004 and 02-06-2004 Sh. Jagbir Singh and Sh . Ishwar Singh were on duty . The management has engaged two persons for alternate duty. When Sh . Ishwar Singh came Sh . Rajbir Singh was inside the premises .

In the circumstances narrated above provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947 are not attracted and detailed inquiry is not required in every case . There was complaint of drunkenness by cosecurity personnel . Under the circumstances the management has rightly stopped the workman on 03-09-2004from resuming his duties . In cases where a workmari has worked for sufficient duration he has obtained almost a right to service and in those cases inquiry is necessary as has been held in 2007 LLR 1099. In the instant case the workman has hardly worked for a year and he was found in a drunken state on several occasions . The management cannot be compelled to reinstate such workman or even to pay compensation in view ofgrave misconduct committed by the workman.

The reference is repliedthus:

The management has examined two witnesses Sh . Shalender Singh and Sh . Ishwar Singh . Shri Ishwar Singh is the complainant and he has proved Ex. MW2 which is written in his own handwriting and he has taken the name of workman who quarreled with him and torn his clothes , so from the evidence of Sh . Ishwar Singh , co- employee and Sh . Shailender Singh it is found proved that the workınan was in drunken state on 12-06-2004 .

The action of the management of Central Fertilizer Quality Control & Training Institute in terminating the services of Shri Jagbir Singh , S/ o . Shri Tej Ram , Chowkidar Security Guard w.e.f. 02-09-2004 is legal and justified. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

It was submitted from the side ofthe workman : hat a stigma has been cast against the workman . No inquiry has beenheld by the management. The services of the workman hasbeen arbitrarily terminated without serving chargesheet on him and holding appropriate inquiry.

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 20-11-2007.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3531 ,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरिएण्टल इंशोरेन्स कं. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्देिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 181/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

A full - fledged inquiry is not necessary in every misconduct of a casual/ daily wager . In case the management is compelled to hold inquiry in every case of casual/ daily wagers , the management will go on holding inquiries . The workman was appointed as daily wager casual Chowkidar on 28-10-2003 . Evidence of the management witness shows that the workman was in a habit of drinking inside the premises during the duty hours and this fact has been corroborated by two witnesses of the management. Sh. Ishwar Singh has been examined as MW2 and he has written complaint to the Director regarding drunkenness and misconduct of the workman . The workman was found again in drunken state on 02-09-2004 and he was asked not to come on duty. There is no mention of misconduct in termination order which can be held to be stigmatic.

[सं. एल-17012/32/1996- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी My attention was drawn to 2007 LLR 1099. In this case the workman has worked for 7 years and there is a simple complaint of misbehaviour with a student . There is

4878GL07-11 9788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/ AGRAHAYANA 24, 1929

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3531 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 181/97) of the Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum -Labour Court Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Orintal Insurance Co. Ltd. and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007 .

[No. L- 17012/32/1996- IR (B - II)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL

TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/181/97

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI C.M.SINGH Shri Shivdas Jharia ,

Purani Basti , Azad Nagar ,

Ranjhi ,

Jabalpur (MP)

Workman/Union

Versus

Divisional Manager ,

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd . ,

123 , Napier Town ,

Management Jabalpur(MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 29th day of October - 2007 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L - 17012/32 /96 /IR( B - 11 ) dated 30-5-97/7-797 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd . , Jabalpur in terminating the ser- vicesofSh . Shivdas Jharia , Development Officer vide their order dated 21-7-94 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled ? " 2. Order dated 26-10-07 passed on the order-sheet of this reference proceeding reveals that inspite of suf- ficient service of notice , the parties did not turn up and no body put in appearance for them .

3. Under the above circumstances , this tribunal was left with no option but to close the reference for award.

4. It is a no evidence case . Therefore it deserves to be decided against the workman and in favour of the management without any orders as to cost . The reference is decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] costs holding that the action of the management of Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. , Jabalpur in terminating the services of Sh.Shivdlas Jharia , Development Officer vide their order dated 21-7-94 is legal andjus- tified and consequently the workman is not entitled toanyrelief.

5. Let the copies of award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour & Employment as per rules.

C. MI . SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3532.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जवलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 / 13/2004- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3532 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 53/2004) of Cent . Govt. Indius . Tribunal - cum - Labour Court Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23- 11-2007.

[No. L- 12011 / 13 /2004- IR (B - II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS- TRIAL

TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/R/53/04

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI C.M. SINGH The General Secretary,

Union Bank of India , Ashirvad Market , Lordganj ,

Jabalpur

Workman /Union

Versus

The Zonal Manager ,

Bank of India ,

ZonalOffice, Govind Kunk Colony, Russel Chowk, Jabalpur.

Management 9789 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

Passed on this 2nd day of November -2007

No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management ofPunjab National Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007.

[No. L- 12012/ 135/2000- IR(B -II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer I. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L- 12011 / 13/2004- IR(B- II) dated 2-6-2004 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SANT SINGH BAL PRESIDING OFFICER

"Whether the action of the management ofBank of India is not giving premotional financial benefit to Sh.K.K.Donge then Cash Clerk , Khamaria Branch is justified ? If not, what relief is the concerned workman entitled to? "

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 NEWDELHI

I.D. NO . 27/2001

In the matter ofdispute between:

Shri Janak Raj Prashar , Asrepresented by his L.Rs. Mrs. Chitra Parashar , MissMeenakshi Parashar , Ms. Seema Parashar Kanika Parashar

2. Order dated 1-11-07 passed on the ordersheet of this reference reveals that the workman/Union did not file any statement of claim and prayed for closing the reference as the dispute appears to have been settled between the parties . That the counsel for the management did not object for closing the reference . That , therefore the refer- ence was closed for award .

MasterKuldeep

House No.2 , Ward No. 10 , Mohalla Barh,.

Old Faridabad .

3. It is a case without any pleadings and without any evidence of the parties . The reference , there- fore, deserves to be decided against the work- man/Union and in favour of the management with- out any orders as to costs .

L.Rs. ofworkman

Versus

Canara Bank,

Through , Dv. General Manager , Canara Bank, Staff Circle Office , 81-83 , Sector -34 А,

PlotNo. 1 ,

4. The reference is decided in favour of the manage- ment and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of Bank of India in not giving pro- motional financial benefit to Sh.K.K.Donge the thenCash Clerk, Khamaria Branch is justified and consequently the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

Chandigarh- 1600 17.

'Management

Appearances : Workman in person.

5. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govern- ment of India, Ministry ofLabour & Employment asper rules.

Shri Rajat AroraA/R for the management.

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.L - 12042/ 135/2000 /IR(, B - II ) dated 21-3-2001 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in compulsory retiring from service 10 Shri Janak Raj isjustified and legal ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

का. आ. 3533 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/135/2000- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 26th November, 2007

2. Brief facts of this case as culled from record are that the deceased workman Shri Janak Raj joired as clerk on 17.8.78 in the erstwhile Lakshmi Commerical Bank which was merged with Canara Bank in 1985 and continued to work in the clerical cadre and lastly he worked at Farida bad Branch. The workman was an active Trade Urion Member of Haryana Bank Employees Federation and was hold ing the post of Joint Secretary in the Federation in the year 1998. His participation in union activities was not liked by the management and he was suspended for his unicon S.O. 3533 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 27/2001 ) of Cent . Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum - Labour Court 9790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 / AGRAHAYANA 21 1929

[PART 1 SEC. 3 (ii) ]

against him. Aggrieved by the said punishment the workman had preferred an appeal vide his representation dated 23-11-99 to the Appelale.caborty of the Bank whe gave a wetsomati saring, to the Gaimant on 23-3-2000 at New Deihi . The Appellate Authority confirmed the panishment of compulsory retirement imposed upon the claimant and thus the appeal was rejected vide orders dated 11-5-2000 . The said orders were conveyed to the workman vide proceedings dated 18-5-2000 . It is stated that the enquiry proceedings were held in consonance with the principles of natural justice and the charges against the deceased were proved and thereafter the punishtnent of compulsory retirement was impused upon the claimant . The L.Rs. of the deceased workman have no case for grant of monetary/consequential benefits .

4. Written statement was followed by rejoinder wherein the controverted facts of the written statement were refuted and those of claim statement were reiterated to be correct.

5. Sint . Chitra Parashar wife / F.R . of late Shri Janak Raj Parashar examined herself as WW I on behalf of the workman and management examined Shri R. Vishwanathan MW 1 on behalf of the management

6. I have heard Smt . Chitra Parashar Wi fe of the workman and Shri Rajat Arora on behalfofthe management and perused the record meticulously.

activities and he was charge sheeted vide charge sheet dated 9-7-98 for having committed gross misconduct within the meaning of Chapter XI Regulation 3 (k) of Canara Bank Service Code for assaulting , abusing and threatening and manhandling Mr. Katlaria Bank Manager in his cabin and giving fist blows on his face resulting ' injuries to his lips and teeth and causing bleeding . This act was prejudicial to the interest of the bank . Enquiry was held. The workman initially attended the inquiry but was proceeded exparte. Fivewitnesses namely Shri S.K.Malik . Officer Tikona Park, Faridabad , Shri Satpal Marwah , Manager , Currency Chest , Faridabad, Shri Y.L.Madan , AGM , RO, Karnal , Shri M.S.Katlaria , Manager , Currency Chest Faridabad since working at A/ c Section , Chandigarh , Shri I.N.Sharma, Chief Manager , Faridabad were examined during the enquiry. As per Enquiry report the claimant was held guilty of the charges levelled against him . It was found that charge sheeted workman came in a drunken condition , abused and manhandled Mr. S.K.Katlaria and was held guilty of the charges levelled against him. This finding of the enquiry officer was accepted by the Disciplinary Authority Committee and the Appellate Authority accepted the findings and confirmed by the Appellate Authority . During enquiry Mr. Katlaria Manager deposed that Mr. Janak Raj (claimant) under the influence of Liquor entered his cabin, abused and assaulted him and gave a punch i.e. fist blow onhis face causing injuries on his lips and teeth resulting in bleeding Shri S.K.Malik (witness ) saw him bleeding from his mouth during enquiry Mr. Katlaria deposed that he was beaten by claimant Janak Raj Parashar .MW2 too deposed that he did not see Mr. Janak Raj Parashar claimant beating Mr. Katlaria nor any liquor was served. He too was told by Mr. Katlaria that he was beaten by the claimant . MW3 Y.L.Madan AGM investigated the matter which reportedly took place on 22-2-98 in the Currency Chest Faridabad.

7. Perusal of record shows that enquiry has been conductedby E.O. the workman initially attended the enquiry and later on proceeded exparte during enquiry. 4-5witnesses were examined. Mr. Katlaria Bank Manager deposed that he was given a tist blow on his face by Mr. Janak Raj which resulted in bleeding and thatMr. Janak Raj was drunked at the time when he gave beating in the office premises in his cabin without any provocation because he asked not to take whisky in the party of an officer who was transferred on account of which Mr. Katlaria entered in his cabin and gave him a fist blow , The act of giving beating by punching a senior officer in his face in drunken conditionby the claimant certainly amounts to an act of misbehaviour on the part of the workman and thus he has committed an act of misbehaviour and has been aptly held guilty of mishehaviour by the Enquiry Officer and the Appellate Authority . It has been urged that the punishment of compulsory retirement is disproportionate and claimant deserved lesser punishment particularly when he is no more and since deceased . But I do not find any mitigating circumstance for giving any lesser punishinent as giving beating to senior officer without any provocation is certainly very serious one and amounts to an act of indiscipline in official acts which is impermissible in discharge of official duty. The findings of the Enquiry Officer and Disciplinary Authority and punishment imposed needs no interference . In my opinion the action of the management of Canara Bank in compulsorily retiring the claimant from service for his act of misbehavour is justified and legal . Award is passed accordingly. File be consigned to record room .

SANT SINGH BAL , Presiding Officer

Dated 16-10-07

3. Chim was contested by the management by filing written statement stating that the workman was working as a clerk since 29-4-1995 and while working at the Currency Chest Faridabad he was placed under suspension by the Disciplinary Authority in contemplation and initiation of disciplinary action vide orders dated 22-5-98 and thereafter he was charge- sheeted for gross misconduct vide charge sheet dated 9-7-98 wherein it was alleged that the (deceased) workman on 22-5-98 entered the Manager's cabin in a drunken state and abused and threatened M.S.Katlaria, Manager without any provocation . He had also assaulted him in his cabin and punched him on his face causing injuries to his lips/teeth resulting in bleeding. The workman had committed a gross misconduct within the meaning of " Chapter 11 , Regulation 3 (k) and 3 (m) of the Canara Bank Service Code . The workman did not submit any reply to the charge sheet and consequent thereupon the Disciplinary Authority appointed the Enquiry Officer to enquire into the charges levelled against the workman vide his proceedings dated 6-8-98 . During enquiry five witnesses and 11 documents were produced on behalf of the management . After conclusion of the proceedings the Enquiry Officer vide his enquiry report dated 20-7-99 had found that the workman was guilty of the charges levelled [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3534,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-12012/35/2005-आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 26th November, 2007 S.O. 3534.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 58/2005) of Cent . Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on23-11-2007 .

[No. L- 12012/35/2005 - IR (B- II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

ANNEXURE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

Tuesday, the25th Sept. , 2007 PresidingOfficer K. JAYARAMAN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 58/2005 , (In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Indian Bank and their Workman.)

BETWEEN

979.1 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.

The schedule [amended by corrigendum dated 09-06-2006] mentioned in that order is:

"Whether the punishment of removal from service with'superannuation benefits imposed on Shri R. Thirumurthy, sub-staffby the management of Indian Bank , Trichy vide order dated 12-07-2003 and 24-05-2004 is legal and justified? Ifnot, what relief the Workman is entitled to?" 2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, it was taken on file as I.D. No. 58/2005 and notices were issued to both the parties and they have entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively.

3. The allegations of the petitioner in the amended Claim Statement are briefly as follows:

I Party/Petitioner

Sri R. Thirumurthy

Vs.

The Assistant General Manager

Indian Bank, Circle Office Trichy II Party/Management APPEARANCE:

For the Petitioner

M/s S. Ayyathurai and

D. Bharathy, Advocates

For the Management M/sKing & Partridge, Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry ofLabour vide its Order No. L- 12012/ 35/2005 - IR (B - II ) dated 17-06-2005 4878G1/07-12

The petitioner was working as sub -staff in Karur branch of the Respondent/Bank. While so, he was placed under suspension by the Disciplinary Authority by all order dated 15-07-2002 alleging that he fraudulently withdrew money from the account of a customer by name Mr. R. Marudhan by utilising the services ofthird parties. Show cause notice was issued to him and after that the. Respondent/Management has framed charges on 05-10-2002 making the same allegations of fraudulent withdrawal of amount from the customer's account and ordered for enquiry. But , before this , the management had conducted preliminary enquiry by one Mr. R. Balakrishnan , Assistant Manager , Circle Office , Trichy. The petitioner evenbefore him has denied the allegation and told that he had not done anything like that. But the Assistant Manager , Circle Office and Branch Manager one Mr. Rangarajan . threatened the petitioner with police action for no fault of his and the petitioner had no other option but to admit the false allegations made against him . In these circumstances, he admitted the allegations and remitted the amount . Enquiry was conducted by the Senior Manager of the Respondent/Bank, but the enquiry was not conducted fairly and properly and in accordance with principles of natural justice. Though in the enquiry he asked time for cross -examination of witnesses , it was refused and thereby denied him the opportunity to defend himselfeffectively in the enquiry. Further, the Enquiry Officer did not allow the petitioner to let in any evidence saying that has already admitted the charge and no purpose would be served by letting in any evidence . Thus, the enquiry was conducted denying reasonable opportunity to the Petitioner to defend himself effectively in the enquiry. After the enquiry, the Disciplinary Authority after following the procedure has proposed the punishment of removal from service with superannuation benefits . The management without considering his explanation in a proper perspective imposed the punishment by an order dated 12-07-2003 . The Appellate 9792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

Authority also by an order dated 25-04-20004 rejected the appeal without considering the same in a proper perspective. Therefore, the petitioner raised the dispute before labour authorities and on the failure of conciliation the matter was referred by the Govt . to this Tribunal for adjudication . The Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority failed to consider that he was not given a reasonable opportunity of defending himself effectively in the enquiry thereby enquiry was not conducted fairly and properly and in accordance with the principles of natural justice . The Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority failed to consider the fact that the petitioner was coerced to admit the false allegation made against him and the so called admission was not voluntary . Therefore , the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse and not based on any legal or acceptable evidence . The petitioner has nothing to do with the fraudulent withdrawal of money from the account of the customer Mr. Marudhan on the two alleged occasions and they have been committed by outsiders . The petitioner is innocent and ignorant of charges and he has not committed the misconduct alleged against him . The punishment imposed on him by the management is highly disproportionate to the gravity of the charges . Hence , for all these reasons , he prays to set aside the punishment of removal from service and to direct the Respondent/Management to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service and other attendant benefits.

4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that it is true that show cause notice dated 02-08-20002 was issued to the petitioner for the reported misappropriation of bank's money and he was given ten days time for filing his reply. But , the petitioner has not submitted any reply nor he sought for extension of time , Therefore , charge sheet was issued on 05-10-20002 for the misconduct alleged against him . The petitioner appointed, one Mr. Syed Hussamudeen of Indian Bank Staff Union as his defence representative , who is a veteran trade union leader having Master of Law degree . In the domestic enquiry six witnesses were examined and 15 documents were marked on the side of Respondent/ Management . witnesses were cross examinedby the defence representative . On behalf of the petitioner two defence exhibits were marked . The defence representative and delinquent employee, consciously took the decision of not producing any witness on their side. After that an opportunity was given to the petitioner to submit his submission . Thereafter the Enquiry Officer prepared the enquiry report dated 07-03-2003 elaborately analysing oral and documentary evidence and held that all the charges against the delinquent employee were proved beyond doubt . Thus the enquiry was conducted in accordance with principles of natural justice and full opportunity was givento the delinquent employee to defend the charges. It is false to allege that the services of the petitioner are

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] unblemished . The past service records , of the petitioner was not satisfactory. No doubt, the Disciplinary Authority placed him under suspension by his order dated 15-07-2002, but only in connection with the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs . 20,0001 -from the account Mr. Maurdhan by utilising the services ofthird party . When the fraudulent withdrawal came to , light after marshalling the details on the alleged involvement of the petitioner, then only the show cause notice was issued to him . Further , if the petitioner's stand that he was coerced and threatened with police action by the Investigation Officer is correct, he would have reported the matter either orally or in writing in the language known to him to the higher authorities immediately. But, he has not done anything. Therefore , the stand now taken by him is an afterthought . The petitioner himself came forward to give confession and the same was obtained in the presence of the II Party/ Management . The petitioner has not stated as to how the Respondent/Bank failed to adhere to the principles ofnatural justice or the manner of conducting the enquiry . The defence representative defended the petitioner in the enquiry in his capacity as President of the Union , he being a veteran trade union leader, the allegation of the petitioner that the defence representative also succumbed to the pressure of the management and failed to produce any evidence on his side is nothing but imaginary. The Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority had given reasons for their conclusion and therefore , it is false to allege that he has not given any reasonable opportunity to defend himself. The findings of the Enquiry Officer is on the basis of legal and acceptable evidence . Since the Respondent being financial institution , the frauds committed by its employee cannot be taken lightly, hence the misconduct committed by the petitioner is grave in nature and called for deterrent punishment . Hence , for all these reasons , the, Respondent prays that the " claim may be dismissed with costs .

Points for determination:

( 1 ) Whether the punishment ofremoval from service , imposed on the petitioner by the Respondent Management by its order 4-05-2004 is legal and justifed?

(2) "To what relief the petitioner is entitled to ?

5. Inthis case, both sides have not adduced any oral evidence before this Tribunal . The petitioner's documents have been marked as W2 to W5 . The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse since they are not based on any acceptable legal evidence . He has further argued that the Management witnesses MW2 & MW3 have deposed about the 3rd party who came to the bank , have taken the money, the Enquiry Officer has not relied on the evidence given by these persons and he has not given any reason to reject the arguments of the defence representative , has given a [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9795

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

AWARD

The CentralGovernment, Ministry ofLabour vide its OrderNo. L- 12012/ 107/2006 IR (B - II ) dated 28-05-2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Overseas Bank in dismissing the services of Sri R. Mohan is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to?

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 26/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Evan after several notices , the petitioner has not appeared before this Tribunal . On the other hand , the Respondent appeared through their advocate and filed their Memo ofObjection . The petitioner called and set ex-parte on 27-09-2007.

3. The allegation in the objection filed by the Respondent are briefly as follows :

Though the petitioner has raised the dispute , he has not appeared before this Tribunal and this clearly establishes that he is not interested in contesting the I.D. Hence the Respondent prays to dismiss the 1.D. with costs.

Pointfor determination is:

1. Whether the action of the managerment of Indian Overseas Bank in dismissing the services of Sri R. Mohan is legal and justified?

2. If not, to what relief is the workman entitled to ? " Point No.1 & 2

4.As Ihave already pointed out, the petitioner though has raised the dispute before the labour authorities . After the dispute was referred to this Tribunal , he has not appeared before this Court to establish his case whether the Respondent Management has illegally terminated his services without any reason or rthymes . Since the petitioner hasnot appeared before this Tribunal to establish his case, this Tribunal is not in a position to say whether the action takenby the Respondent Bank in dismissing the petitioner from service is legal orjustified.

5. As against this , the Respondent contended that since the petitioner has no interest in the case and remained exparte the dispute is to be dismissed with their costs . Therefore, I find since the petitioner has not established before this Tribunal that the action taken by the Respondent Bank is illegal and unjustified, I find the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

6. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 29th October, 2007)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :

None Forthe I Party/Petitioner

For the Il Party/Management

Documents Marked:

Description Ex.No. Nil Date From the Management side : Ex.No. Date Nil None Description नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3536:-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12011 /24/2007- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] . राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007

S.O. 3536.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 33/2007) of Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Bank , and their workman , received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007:

[No. L- 12011 /24/2007- IR (B - II ) ] RANNDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI Wednesday, the 29th August, 2007 PRESENT : K. JAYARAMAN Presiding Officer INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 33/2007 (In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Indian Bank and their Workmen)

BETWEEN

I Party/Petitioner Union The General Secretary Indian Bank Employees Unton, Chennai 9796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007 /AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

II Party/Respondent The Dy, General Manager Indian Bank Kanchipuram

APPEARANCE

For the Petitioner

Sri E. Arunachalam

Authorised Repre- sentative

Sri P. Sankar For the Management :

Authorised Representative

AWARD

TheCentral Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12011 /24/2007 /IR( B - II ) dated 04.07.2007 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

"Whether the action of the management in withholding of increments due to Sri G. Elango is justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal hasnumbered it as ID 33/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides have entered through their representatives . The petitioner's representative filed a memo stating since the Respondent/ Management has already sanctioned the annual increment due to Sri Elango , Clerk/Shroff, the grievance of the employee is already redressed and therefore the dispute is not now in existence and therefore the issue may be treated as amicably resolved.

3. The representative of the second party management filed a memo stating that in view of the memo filed by the petitioner union , this dispute may be closed as withdrawn and request this Tribunal to pass an order to that effect . In these circumstances , the point of determination is :

to: (i) To what relief the concerned employee is entitled 4. Since the petitioner union has filed a memo stating that, the increments has been given by the Respondent/ Management after the petitioner union raised the dispute before the labour authorities and further stated that the issue in this dispute has already been settled amicably and therefore there is no necessity to proceed with the enquiry . Since the petitioner has filed this memo that the dispute has been settled, I find there is no use in proceeding this dispute.

5. Inview ofthe my foregoing findings , I find this dispute as settled and therefore this Tribunal has no need to pass any award .

6. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 29th August , 2007)

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :

None For the I Party/Petitioner

None For the IIParty/Management

Documents Marked:

From the Petitioner's side

Date

Ex.No.

.Description

Nil

From the Management side :

Ex.No.

Date

Description Nil

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3537.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयर इंडियन लिमिटिड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय ,मुम्बई -2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-11012/14/2005- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेहलता जावास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3537. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 86/2005 ) of the Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Mumbai -2 as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the the employers in relation to the management of Air India Limited , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007 .

[No. L- 11012/ 14/2005 - IR (C- I ] SNEHLATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE- I

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 , MUMBAI.

PRESENT A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGI T - 2/86 OF 2005 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. AIR INDIA LTD .

9797

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 15, 2007/अग्रहायण 24 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

The Chairman -cum- Managing Director

M/ s . Air India Ltd.

OldAirport Santacruz(E) Mumbai-400 029.

AND THEIR WORKMEN

ThePresident, Air India Employees Guild Old Airport , Santacruz (E) Mumbai-400 029 .

APPEARANCES

Fortheemployer

M/s . M.V. Kini & Co. Advocates For the workmen

No appearance Corrigendum to award dated 29th August, 2007 Ministry'sOrder No. L- 30012/85 /2001.- IR( M ) , dated 23rd January, 2001 appearing on page 2, 3rd line of the Ist paragraph may be read as Order No. L- 11012/ 14/2005 - IR (C- I) , dated 2-6-2005.

Date: 12-10-2007

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer

ANNEXURE- II

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . II AT MUMBAI

PRESENT

A.A. LAD , PRESIDING OFFICER REFERENCE NO . CGII - 2/86 OF 2005 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S . AIR INDIA LIMITED

TheChairman-cum-Managing Director ,

Old Airport, Santacruz (East) ,

M/s . Air India Limited, Mumbai 400 029 .

....... FirstParty.

AND

Their workman The President .

Air India Employees Guild , OldAirport, Santacruz ( East) , Mumbai-400 0:29.

.Second Party

APPEARANCES

Forthe employer

:M/s . M.V. Kini & Co. , Advocates For the workman

:No appearance DateofPsssing of Award I : 29th August, 2007

AWARD

The reference is sent to this Tribunal by the Under Secretary of Central Government, The Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L-30012/85/ 2001 - IR(M) dated 23rd January , 2001 in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to decide:

"Whether the demand of the Air India Employees Guild from the management of Air India that Sh . S.U. Chandan Shive be appointed as Trainee Technician with all consequential benefits w.e.f. 1984 justified ?? Ifso, to what relief is the workmen entitled?

(2) After receipt of the Reference it was fixed for filing Statement of Claim by 2nd Party. However , Claim Statement is not filed by 2nd Party though number of dates were given . Hence , the order:

ORDER

Reference is disposed off for want of prosecution .

Mumbai ,

29thAugust , 2007 .

A. A. LAD, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3538: औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार रशियन एयर लाइन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली-2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -11012/54/2007-आई आर( सी- I ) ] स्नेहलता जावास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3538.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2007) of the Cent. Govt . Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court New Delhi - II now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Russian Air Lines, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23-11-2007.

[No. L- 11012/54/2007-IR (C- 1 ) ]

SNEHLATA JAWAS , Desk Officer 9798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 15 , 2007/AGRAHAYANA 24 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] ANNEXURE

AWARD

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 54/ 2007 - IR ( CM - I ) Central Government Dt . 02-07-2007 has reterred the following point for adjudication .

GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , RAJENDRA BHAWAN, GROUND FLOOR, RAJENDRA PLACE , NEW DELHI

The point runs as hereunder :

PRESIDING OFFICER : R.N.RAJ ID . No. 25/2007

In the matter of:

Shri Harminder Singh ,

Whether the action of the management of Aeroflot , Russian International Airlines , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Shri Harminder Singh w.e.f. 30-04-2006 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled."

S/o. Shri Saran Singh , R/ o . B - 57 , IAAI Colony , Mahipalpur , Palam Colony , New Delhi - 110037.

VERSUS

transpires from perusal of the order sheet that the reference has been received on 17-07-2007 . Four dates have beengiven thereafter. The workman was not present . No claim statement has been filed .

The General Manager,

No dispute award is given .

Date: 20-11-2007 .

Aeroflot , Russian Airlines , Ground Floor, Tolstoy Marg , 15-17 , TolstoyMarg . New Delhi - 110001.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road . Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054